alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 96-11051 Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus ROBERTO MARTINEZ, Defendant-Appellant.

- - - - - - - - - - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas USDC No. 3:96-CR-117-R

- - - - - - - - - - October 21, 1997 Before POLITZ, Chief Judge, and WIENER and DENNIS, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: * Appellant Roberto Martinez appeals his sentence for conspiracy to distribute methamphetamine. He argues that the district court erred: 1) in refusing to give him a 3-point adjustment for acceptance of responsibility; 2) in calculating the amount of drugs, because it impermissibly included quantities of drugs not specified in the count of conviction; and 3) in giving him a four-level enhancement for being a leader in theNo. 96-11051 -2- conspiracy because there was inadequate evidence to support such.

The Government’s motion to dismiss the appeal because Martinez waived his right to appeal on the grounds raised is
GRANTED. See United States v. Portillo , 18 F.3d 290, 292-93 (5th Cir. 1994).
MOTION GRANTED; APPEAL DISMISSED.
### §§2341 to 2343. Repealed. Pub. L. 90–629, ch. 4, §45(a), Oct. 22, 1968, 82 Stat. 1327

Section 2341, Pub. L. 87–195, pt. II, §521, formerly §514, as added Pub. L. 89–583, pt. II, §201(f), Sept. 19, 1966, 80 Stat. 803; renumbered §521 and amended Pub. L. 90–137, pt. II, §201(o)(1), (3)–(7), Nov. 14, 1967, 81 Stat. 457, provided for administration of sales programs involving defense articles and services. Subsec. (a) related to encouragement of regional arms control and disarmament agreements and discouragement of arms races; reimbursable basis of acquisitions; domestic procurement; and considerations. Subsec. (b) related to limitation on military assistance and sales for American Republics; and inclusion of assistance to inter-American military force under control of Organization of American States. Subsec. (c) related to furnishing of defense articles and services; conditions; and report to Congress. For subject matter of subsecs. (a) to (c), see sections 2751 and 2791, 2773, and 2753 of this title, respectively.

Section 2342, Pub. L. 87–195, pt. II, §522, formerly §507 (a), Sept. 4, 1961, 75 Stat. 437; amended Pub. L. 87–565, pt. II, §201(b), Aug. 1, 1962, 76 Stat. 259; Pub. L. 89–171, pt. II, §201(d)(1), Sept. 6, 1965, 79 Stat. 657; renumbered §522 and amended Pub. L. 90–137, pt. II, §201(f), Nov. 14, 1967, 81 Stat. 456, provided for sales of defense articles from stock and services, manner of payment, price of non-excess defense articles, and value of excess defense articles. See section 2761 of this title.

Section 2343, Pub. L. 87–195, pt. II, §523, formerly §507(b), Sept. 4, 1961, 75 Stat. 437; amended Pub. L. 87–565, pt. II, §201(c), Aug. 1, 1962, 76 Stat. 259; Pub. L. 88–633, pt. II, §201(c), Oct. 7, 1964, 78 Stat. 1011; Pub. L. 89–171, pt. II, §201(d)(2), Sept. 6, 1965, 79 Stat. 657; renumbered §523 and amended Pub. L. 90–137, pt. II, §201(g), Nov. 14, 1967, 81 Stat. 456, related to contracts for procurement for sales; undertakings; reimbursements; fixed-price sales agreements; prohibition against sales of articles available from commercial sources; and waiver of restrictions. See section 2762 of this title.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date of Repeal

Repeal effective July 1, 1968, see section 41 of Pub. L. 90–629, set out as an Effective Date note under section 2751 of this title.

#### Savings Provision

Pub. L. 90–629, §46, Oct. 22, 1968, 82 Stat. 1328, provided that: "Except as may be expressly provided to the contrary in this Act [see Short Title note set out under section 2751 of this title], all determinations, authorizations, regulations, orders, contracts, agreements, and other actions issued, undertaken, or entered into under authority of any provision of law repealed by section 45(a) [repealing sections 2341 to 2343, 2344(b)(3), 2345, 2394(g), and 2399a of this title] shall continue in full force and effect until modified by appropriate authority."
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Consumer Product Safety Commission

# TIME AND DATE:

 Wednesday, April 27, 2011; 10 a.m.-11 a.m.

# PLACE:

 Room 410, Bethesda Towers, 4330 East West Highway, Bethesda, Maryland.

# STATUS:

 Closed to the public.

## Matter To Be Considered

### Compliance Status Report

The Commission staff will brief the Commission on the status of compliance matters.

For a recorded message containing the latest agenda information, call (301) 504-7948.

# CONTACT PERSON FOR MORE INFORMATION:

 Todd A. Stevenson, Office of the Secretary, U.S. Consumer Product Safety Commission, 4330 East West Highway, Bethesda, MD 20814, (301) 504-7923.

Dated: April 19, 2011.

Todd A Stevenson,

Secretary.

[FR Doc. 2011-9882 Filed 4-19-11; 4:15 pm]

BILLING CODE 6355-01-P
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY HIGH

 77

 84

 83

 81

 88

 78

 77

 78

 90

 85

 84

 87

 84

 86

 85

 111

 79

 76

 76

 75

 75

 73

 74

 73

 77

 80

 76

 79

 73

 74

 74

 66

 77

 78

 76

 76

 75

 72

 75

 79

 79

 79

 76

 75

 76

 77

 78

 72

 71

 70

 70

 70

 69

 69

 69

 71

 74

 73

 71

 70

 71

 70

 71

 79

 80

 78

 79

 76

 75

 77

 80

 80

 80

 80

 78

 78

 78

 83

 74

 72

 72

 72

 72

 71

 70

 71

 73

 76

 74

 73

 71

 72

 72

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

JULY 2009 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: August 4, 2009

HIGH LOW MEAN

 71.0

 74.2

 76.0

 76.1

 75.4

 74.8

 74.3

 74.7

 75.9

 75.6

 74.4

 73.7

 75.7

 77.7

 79.2

 79.1

 77.6

 77.4

 76.9

 76.7

 75.6

 74.5

 74.6

 74.5

 75.8

 77.4

 76.3

 76.7

 75.4

 75.1

 74.9

 65.9

 68.2

 70.3

 70.7

 70.5

 69.2

 69.3

 69.2

 69.5

 70.0

 70.6

 70.0

 69.1

 71.3

 72.7

 73.5

 73.1

 72.5

 72.8

 72.1

 71.7

 70.4

 69.8

 69.6

 70.2

 71.5

 72.3

 72.2

 71.6

 70.5

 70.2

 68.4

 71.0

 73.0

 73.3

 72.9

 71.9

 71.7

 71.9

 72.5

 72.7

 72.5

 71.7

 72.1

 74.2

 75.7

 76.2

 75.5

 75.0

 75.0

 74.4

 73.8

 72.6

 72.2

 72.0

 72.9

 73.9

 74.4

 74.6

 73.6

 72.9

 72.6

HIGH LOW MEAN

 8.9

 8.3

 8.2

 8.2

 8.4

 8.5

 8.5

 8.6

 8.4

 8.5

 8.4

 8.7

 8.6

 8.5

 8.3

 8.3

 8.4

 8.5

 8.5

 8.5

 8.6

 8.7

 8.7

 8.5

 7.9

 7.8

 8.6

 8.4

 8.6

 8.6

 8.7

 8.0

 7.7

 7.7

 7.5

 7.6

 7.9

 8.0

 7.9

 7.9

 7.7

 7.9

 8.0

 8.1

 7.9

 7.7

 7.6

 7.7

 7.8

 7.8

 7.8

 7.9

 7.9

 7.7

 7.7

 7.4

 7.3

 7.3

 7.9

 7.8

 8.1

 7.9

 8.6

 8.0

 7.9

 7.9

 8.0

 8.1

 8.2

 8.2

 8.1

 8.1

 8.1

 8.3

 8.3

 8.1

 7.9

 7.9

 8.0

 8.1

 8.1

 8.1

 8.1

 8.3

 8.3

 8.1

 7.7

 7.5

 7.8

 8.1

 8.2

 8.3

 8.3

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

RIPON ON THE STANISLAUS RIVER

 ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS WATER TEMPERATURE, DEG DISSOLVED OXYZEN, PPM
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 20-4012

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

v.

CRANDALL ORTAIS INGRAM,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina, at 

Greensboro. N. Carlton Tilley, Jr., Senior District Judge. (1:19-cr-00332-NCT-1)

Submitted: September 28, 2021 Decided: September 30, 2021

Before AGEE, WYNN, and THACKER, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Brian M. Aus, Durham, North Carolina, for Appellant. Matthew G.T. Martin, United 

States Attorney, Terry M. Meinecke, Assistant United States Attorney, OFFICE OF THE

UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Greensboro, North Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Crandall Ortais Ingram pleaded guilty, pursuant to a written plea agreement, to

possession of a firearm by a convicted felon, in violation of 18 U.S.C. §§ 922(g)(1), 

924(a)(2), and was sentenced to 96 months’ imprisonment. On appeal, Ingram, citing 

Rehaif v. United States, 139 S. Ct. 2191 (2019), argues that the district court plainly erred 

by accepting his guilty plea because the criminal information did not adequately charge 

each element of the offense against him. We affirm.

To the extent Ingram seeks to challenge a defect in the criminal information to which

he pleaded guilty, he has waived that argument. See United States v. Moussaoui, 591 F.3d

263, 279 (4th Cir. 2010) (“When a defendant pleads guilty, he waives all nonjurisdictional

defects in the proceedings conducted prior to entry of the plea.” (internal quotation marks

omitted)). To the extent Ingram challenges the validity of his guilty plea, and to the extent

that challenge is not also waived, Ingram’s argument lacks merit. See United States v.

Moody, 2 F.4th 180, 197-98 (4th Cir. 2021) (holding § 922(g) does not require Government 

to prove defendant knew he was prohibited from possessing firearms); see also Greer v. 

United States, 141 S. Ct. 2090, 2097 (2021) (holding that, to obtain relief based on Rehaif

error, defendant must demonstrate that “there is a ‘reasonable probability’ that he would 

not have pled guilty” had district court “correctly advised him of the mens rea element of 

the offense”).
3

We therefore affirm the district court’s judgment. We dispense with oral argument 

because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this 

court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
(No. 73-CC-432

#### Atlantic Richfield Company, Claimant, *vs.*State of Illinois, Secretary of State, Respondent.

*Opinion filed October 18, 1973.*

D. K. Mc Intosh, Attorney for Claimant.

William J. Scott, Attorney General; Saul R. Wexler, Assistant Attorney General, for Respondent.

Per Curiam.
# C_2012280EN.01001102.xml

| 15.9.2012 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 280/11 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

15.9.2012

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 280/11

---

Information communicated by Member States regarding closure of fisheries

2012/C 280/07

In accordance with Article 35(3) of Council Regulation (EC) No 1224/2009 of 20 November 2009 establishing a Community control system for ensuring compliance with the rules of the common fisheries policy (1), a decision has been taken to close the fishery as set down in the following table:

1

| Date and time of closure | 10.8.2012 |
| --- | --- |
| Duration | 10.8.2012-31.12.2012 |
| Member State | Belgium |
| Stock or group of stocks | LEZ/8ABDE. |
| Species | Megrims (Lepidorhombus spp.) |
| Zone | VIIIa, VIIIb, VIIId and VIIIe |
| Type(s) of fishing vessels | — |
| Reference number | FS29TQ43 |

Date and time of closure

10.8.2012

Duration

10.8.2012-31.12.2012

Member State

Belgium

Stock or group of stocks

LEZ/8ABDE.

Species

Megrims (Lepidorhombus spp.)

Lepidorhombus

Zone

VIIIa, VIIIb, VIIId and VIIIe

Type(s) of fishing vessels

—

Reference number

FS29TQ43

---

(1)  OJ L 343, 22.12.2009, p. 1.

1

---
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

DAY HIGH

 254

 252

 251

 263

 253

 250

 266

 277

 281

 268

 282

 263

 256

 261

 261

 270

 269

 276

 282

 291

 322

 298

 290

 265

 264

264

 250

261

 259

 254

 171

 177

 182

 182

 178

 174

 182

 181

 182

 167

 182

 165

 165

 173

 184

 187

 178

 182

 183

 176

 175

 167

 161

 159

 158

157

 168

168

174

 156

 227

 225

 225

 228

 228

 228

 235

 242

 247

 242

 250

 231

 229

 233

 235

 239

 232

 236

 240

 242

 248

 240

 231

 225

 221

 225

 222

 228

 221

 224

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

APRIL 2022 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: May 2, 2022

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

SAN ANDREAS ON THE SAN JOAQUIN RIVER
### -84 -82 -80 -78 -76 -74 -72 -70

34 36 38 40 

## ★ ▲ ▲ ▲ ▲



## ★ ▲ ▲ ▲ ▲ 

### 500 1000 1500 100 18 12 06 00 05/31 

## NOAA HYSPLIT MODEL 

# Backward trajectory ending at 2300 UTC 31 May 06

EDAS Meteorological DataSource★at 38.92 N 77.01 WMeters AGL 

## ★ ■ ■ ■ ■



## ★ ■ ■ ■ ■ 

## ★ ● ● ● ●



## ★ ● ● ● ●
Exhibit 23.1
 CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
 
  /s/ MSPC.

CERTIFIED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS AND ADVISORSA PROFESSIONAL CORPORATION
Exhibit 32.1

# Certification Pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. 1350,As Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In
connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended November 30, 2004 (the
Report) of Immucor, Inc. (the Registrant), as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, I certify, to the best of my
knowledge, that:

(1)    
          The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
          Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

(2)    
          The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
          respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant.

January 14, 2005

/s/ Edward L. Gallup

Edward L. Gallup
               Chief Executive Officer
#### LOUISVILLE & N. R. CO. v. TUCKER et al.

No. 11840.

United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit.

Aug. 31, 1954.

Clifton & Mack, Memphis, Tenn., for appellant.

Harsh, Pierce, Cochran, Rickey & Carey, Memphis, Tenn., for appellees.

Lucius E. Burch, Jr., Memphis, Tenn., Clyde W. Key, Knoxville, Tenn., Edwin F. Hunt, Nashville, Tenn., R. H. Sprag-ins, Jackson, Tenn., amicus curiae.

Before SIMONS, Chief Judge, and McALLISTER and MILLER, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

Appellant’s petition for rehearing, together with brief of amici curiae, having been considered by the Court;

And the Court being of the opinion that the following quotation in the Court’s opinion of March 8, 1954, taken from the opinion in Majestic v. Louisville & N. R. Co., 6 Cir., 147 F.2d 621, 624-625, which in turn was based on Nashville & Chattanooga R. Co. v. Anthony, 69 Tenn. 516, does not properly state the present Tennessee rule as explained in Tennessee cases subsequent to Nashville & Chattanooga R. Co. v. Anthony, supra; see Louisville, N. & G. S. R. Co. v. Reidmond, 79 Tenn. 205, 210-211; Louisville *&*N. R. Co. v. Frakes *&*Payne, 11 Tenn.App. 593, 614; Gaines v. Tennessee Central Ry. Co., 175 Tenn. 389, 393, 135 S.W.2d 441; Cincinnati, N. O. & T. P. Ry. Co. v. Galloway, 6 Cir., 59 F.2d 664, 666.

It is ordered that said quotation, reading as follows, be stricken and deleted from the opinion of the Court:

> “The duties of those in charge of a train to observe the requirements of the statute are not confined to the very time the accident occurs. They commence when the obstruction ‘appears’ upon the road and ‘the road’, in contemplation of the statute, is not merely what is called strictly the roadbed or track, but also includes the public approaches thereto and it is the duty of the lookout to view the whole road within the orbit of his vision. Nashville & Chattanooga R. Co. v. Anthony, 69 Tenn. 516, 520.” Majestic v. Louisville & N. R. Co., 6 Cir., 147 F.2d 621, 624-625; Union Traction Co. v. Todd, 16 Tenn. App. 200, 64 S.W.2d 26.

And the Court being of the further opinion that the issue involved in this phase of the case was correctly submitted to the jury under the instructions of the trial judge, which were approved in the opinion of March 8, 1954; Cincinnati, N. O. & T. P. Ry. Co. v. Galloway, supra,

It is ordered that said petition for rehearing be and is denied in all other respects.
Exhibit 4.3


 


Consent of Independent Registered
Public Accounting Firm


We have issued our
report dated November 21, 2018, with respect to the financial statement of Smart Trust 410 contained in Amendment No. 2 to the
Registration Statement on Form S-6 (File No. 333-227457) and related Prospectus. We consent to the use of the aforementioned report
in the Registration Statement and Prospectus, and to the use of our name as it appears under the caption “Independent Registered
Public Accounting Firm”.


 


/s/ Grant
Thornton LLP


 


Chicago, Illinois


November 21, 2018
### §286vv. Capital stock increases

#### (a) Increases authorized

The United States Governor of the Bank is authorized—

(1)(A) to vote in favor of a resolution to increase the capital stock of the Bank on a selective basis by 230,374 shares; and

(B) to subscribe on behalf of the United States to 38,459 additional shares of the capital stock of the Bank, as part of the selective increase in the capital stock of the Bank, except that any subscription to such additional shares shall be effective only to such extent or in such amounts as are provided in advance in appropriations Acts;

(2)(A) to vote in favor of a resolution to increase the capital stock of the Bank on a general basis by 484,102 shares; and

(B) to subscribe on behalf of the United States to 81,074 additional shares of the capital stock of the Bank, as part of the general increase in the capital stock of the Bank, except that any subscription to such additional shares shall be effective only to such extent or in such amounts as are provided in advance in appropriations Acts.

#### (b) Limitations on authorization of appropriations

(1) In order to pay for the increase in the United States subscription to the Bank under subsection (a)(2)(B), there are authorized to be appropriated, without fiscal year limitation, $9,780,361,991 for payment by the Secretary of the Treasury.

(2) Of the amount authorized to be appropriated under paragraph (2)(A)— 1

(A) $586,821,720 shall be for paid in shares of the Bank; and

(B) $9,193,540,271 shall be for callable shares of the Bank.

(3) In order to pay for the increase in the United States subscription to the Bank under subsection (a)(1)(B), there are authorized to be appropriated, without fiscal year limitation, $4,639,501,466 for payment by the Secretary of the Treasury.

(4) Of the amount authorized to be appropriated under paragraph (3), $278,370,088 shall be for paid in shares of the Bank, and $4,361,131,378 shall be for callable shares of the Bank.

(July 31, 1945, ch. 339, §70, as added Pub. L. 112–74, div. I, title VII, §7081(a), Dec. 23, 2011, 125 Stat. 1259; amended Pub. L. 113–6, div. F, title VII, §1704(d), Mar. 26, 2013, 127 Stat. 429.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

2013—Subsec. (b)(3), (4). Pub. L. 113–6 added pars. (3) and (4).

1 So in original. Probably should be "paragraph (1)—".
[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 78 (Friday, April 22, 2011)]
[Notices]
[Pages 22672-22673]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2011-9853]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

Foreign-Trade Zones Board

[Order No. 1754]


Grant of Authority for Subzone Status, Allegro Mfg. Inc. 
(Distribution of Cosmetic, Organizer and Electronic Bags and 
Accessories), Commerce, CA

    Pursuant to its authority under the Foreign-Trade Zones Act of June 
18, 1934, as amended (19 U.S.C. 81a-81u), the Foreign-Trade Zones Board 
(the Board) adopts the following Order:
    Whereas, the Foreign-Trade Zones Act provides for ``* * * the 
establishment * * * of foreign-trade zones in ports of entry of the 
United States, to expedite and encourage foreign commerce, and for 
other purposes,'' and authorizes the Foreign-Trade Zones Board to grant 
to qualified corporations the privilege of establishing foreign-trade 
zones in or adjacent to U.S. Customs and Border Protection ports of 
entry;
    Whereas, the Board's regulations (15 CFR Part 400) provide for the 
establishment of special-purpose subzones when existing zone facilities 
cannot serve the specific use involved, and when the activity results 
in a significant public benefit and is in the public interest;
    Whereas, the Port of Long Beach, grantee of Foreign-Trade Zone 50, 
has made application to the Board for authority to establish a special-
purpose

[[Page 22673]]

subzone at the warehouse and distribution facility of Allegro Mfg. 
Inc., located in Commerce, California (FTZ Docket 6-2010, filed 1/15/
2010);
    Whereas, notice inviting public comment has been given in the 
Federal Register (75 FR 4344-4345, 1/27/2010) and the application has 
been processed pursuant to the FTZ Act and the Board's regulations; 
and,
    Whereas, the Board adopts the findings and recommendations of the 
examiner's report, and finds that the requirements of the FTZ Act and 
Board's regulations are satisfied, and that the proposal is in the 
public interest;
    Now, therefore, the Board hereby grants authority for subzone 
status for activity related to cosmetic, organizer and electronic bags 
and accessories warehousing and distribution at the facility of Allegro 
Mfg. Inc., located in Commerce, California (Subzone 50M), as described 
in the application and Federal Register notice, subject to the FTZ Act 
and the Board's regulations, including Section 400.28.

    Signed at Washington, DC, this 18th day of April 2011.
Ronald K. Lorentzen,
Deputy Assistant Secretary for Import Administration, Alternate 
Chairman, Foreign-Trade Zones Board.
    ATTEST:
Andrew McGilvray,
Executive Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2011-9853 Filed 4-21-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE P