alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
### §2151z. Targeted assistance

#### (a) Determination of target populations and strengthening United States assistance

The President shall use poverty measurement standards, such as those developed by the International Bank for Reconstruction and Development, and other appropriate measurements in determining target populations for United States development assistance, and shall strengthen United States efforts to assure that a substantial percentage of development assistance under this part directly improves the lives of the poor majority, with special emphasis on those individuals living in absolute poverty.

#### (b) Ultimate beneficiaries of activities

To the maximum extent possible, activities under this part that attempt to increase the institutional capabilities of private organizations or governments, or that attempt to stimulate scientific and technological research, shall be designed and monitored to ensure that the ultimate beneficiaries of these activities are the poor majority.

(Pub. L. 87–195, pt. I, §128, as added Pub. L. 97–377, title I, §101(b)(2), Dec. 21, 1982, 96 Stat. 1832; amended Pub. L. 99–83, title III, §312(a), Aug. 8, 1985, 99 Stat. 216.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

1985—Pub. L. 99–83, in amending section generally, designated existing provisions as subsec. (a), substituted provisions setting overall guidelines and principles for determination of target populations and strengthening United States assistance, for provisions relating to Presidential responsibility in carrying out this part in fiscal year 1983 for targeting assistance for those living in absolute poverty, and added subsec. (b).

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date of 1985 Amendment

Amendment by Pub. L. 99–83 effective Oct. 1, 1985, see section 1301 of Pub. L. 99–83, set out as a note under section 2151–1 of this title.

#### Report of Administrator of Agency for International Development to Congress by June 21, 1983, on Implementation of Section

Pub. L. 97–377, title I, §101(b)(2), Dec. 21, 1982, 96 Stat. 1832, provided in part that within six months after Dec. 21, 1982, the Administrator of the Agency for International Development would report to Congress on the implementation of this section, the types of projects determined to meet these requirements, and the effect on the overall United States foreign assistance program.

#### **Executive Documents**

#### Delegation of Functions

For delegation of functions of President under this section, see Ex. Ord. No. 12163, Sept. 29, 1979, 44 F.R. 56673, as amended, set out as a note under section 2381 of this title.
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Sal Cigna, Appellant.

Judgment of the County Court, Kings County, convicting defendant of the crime of rape in the first degree, unanimously affirmed. Ho opinion. Present — Lewis, P. J., Carswell, Johnston, Adel and Wenzel, JJ.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### Health Resources and Services Administration

In accordance with section 10(a)(2) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act (Pub. L. 92-463), notice is hereby given of the following meeting:

*Name:*                         National Advisory Council on Migrant Health.                    

*Dates and Times:*                         February 8, 2011, 8:30 a.m. to 5 p.m. February 9, 2011, 8:30 a.m. to 5 p.m.                    

*Place:*                         L'Enfant Plaza Hotel, 480 L'Enfant Plaza, SW., Washington, DC 20024. Telephone: (202) 484-1000. Fax: (202) 646-4456.                    

*Status:*                         The meeting will be open to the public.                    

*Purpose:*                         The purpose of the meeting is to discuss services and issues related to the health of migrant and seasonal farmworkers and their families and to formulate recommendations for the Secretary of Health and Human Services.                    

*Agenda:*                         The agenda includes an overview of the Council's general business activities. The Council will also hear presentations from experts on farmworker issues, including the status of farmworker health at the local and national levels. Agenda items are subject to change as priorities indicate.                              ( print page 1186)    

*For Further Information Contact:*                         Marcia Gomez, MD, Office of Special Population Health, Bureau of Primary Health Care, Health Resources and Services Administration, 5600 Fishers Lane, Rockville, Maryland 20857; telephone (301) 594-4897.                    

Dated: January 3, 2011.

Robert Hendricks,

Director, Division of Policy and Information Coordination.

[FR Doc. 2011-98 Filed 1-6-11; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4165-15-P
[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 78 (Friday, April 22, 2011)]
[Notices]
[Page 22673]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2011-9854]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

Foreign-Trade Zones Board

[Order No. 1755]


Reorganization of Foreign-Trade Zone 176 (Expansion of Service 
Area) Under Alternative Site Framework, Rockford, IL

    Pursuant to its authority under the Foreign-Trade Zones Act of June 
18, 1934, as amended (19 U.S.C. 81a-81u), the Foreign-Trade Zones Board 
(the Board) adopts the following Order:
    Whereas, the Board adopted the alternative site framework (ASF) (74 
FR 1170, 01/12/09; correction 74 FR 3987, 01/22/09; 75 FR 71069-71070, 
11/22/10) as an option for the establishment or reorganization of 
general-purpose zones;
    Whereas, the Greater Rockford Airport Authority, grantee of 
Foreign-Trade Zone 176, submitted an application to the Board (FTZ 
Docket 62-2010, filed 10/26/2010) for authority to expand the service 
area of the zone to include portions of LaSalle and Putnam Counties, as 
described in the application, adjacent to the Rockford Customs and 
Border Protection port of entry;
    Whereas, notice inviting public comment was given in the Federal 
Register (75 FR 67081-67082, 11/1/2010) and the application has been 
processed pursuant to the FTZ Act and the Board's regulations; and,
    Whereas, the Board adopts the findings and recommendations of the 
examiner's report, and finds that the requirements of the FTZ Act and 
Board's regulations are satisfied, and that the proposal is in the 
public interest;
    Now, therefore, the Board hereby orders:
    The application to reorganize FTZ 176 to expand the service area 
under the alternative site framework is approved, subject to the FTZ 
Act and the Board's regulations, including Section 400.28, and to the 
Board's standard 2,000-acre activation limit for the overall general-
purpose zone project.

    Signed at Washington, DC this 18th day of April 2011.
Ronald K. Lorentzen,
Deputy Assistant Secretary for Import Administration, Alternate 
Chairman, Foreign-Trade Zones Board.
    ATTEST:
Andrew McGilvray,
Executive Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2011-9854 Filed 4-21-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE P
<PAGE>   1




                                                                      Exhibit 23

               CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT CERTIFIED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS

                 We have issued our report dated September 10, 1999 (except for
note K, as to which the date is September 29, 1999) accompanying the financial
statements of InfoAccess, Inc. as of December 31, 1998 and 1997 and for each of
the three years in the period ended December 31, 1998 included in this Form
8-K/A. We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference of said report in the
Registration Statements of IntraNet Solutions, Inc. and subsidiaries on Form S-8
No. 333-11489, Form S-3 No. 333-14175, Form S-3 No. 333-33437, Form S-3 No.
333-57181, Form S-8 No. 333-66449, Form S-8 No. 333-66451 and Form S-8 No.
333-90843.

                                                     /s/GRANT THORNTON LLP



Minneapolis, Minnesota
November 29, 1999
#### Marc Sol KAPLAN, Appellant, v. UNITED STATES of America.

No. 15161.

United States Court of Appeals Eighth Circuit.

Aug. 23, 1954.

Merle L. Silverstein, St. Louis, Mo., for appellant.

Harry Richards, U. S. Atty., and William K. Stanard, Asst. U. S. Atty., St. Louis, Mo., for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Appeal from District Court docketed and dismissed, on motion of appellee.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY HIGH

 341

 310

 293

 302

 290

 292

 366

 403

 437

 434

 335

 372

 365

 284

 286

 301

 304

 382

 378

 332

 397

 412

 398

 379

 366

 329

 352

 431

 335

 326

 335

 185

 166

 170

 165

 175

 167

 168

 171

 188

 169

 179

 160

 151

 165

 164

 147

 142

 155

 170

 149

 173

 175

 160

 158

 171

 165

 186

 211

 169

 193

 161

 250

 240

 239

 236

 234

 227

 238

 249

 283

 296

 269

 255

 241

 223

 230

 233

 229

 251

 256

 241

 261

 266

 274

 291

 279

 276

 293

 322

 271

 271

 265

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

OCTOBER 2013 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: February 20, 2014

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

SAN ANDREAS ON THE SAN JOAQUIN RIVER
I 

114TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 4003 

To require reports on agency rules with criminal penalties for the violation 

thereof, to evaluate the necessity and prudence of such rules remaining 

in effect. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

NOVEMBER 16, 2015 

Mrs. MIMI WALTERS of California (for herself, Mr. GOODLATTE, Mr. CONYERS, Mr. BUCK, Mr. BISHOP of Michigan, and Ms. JACKSON LEE) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on the 

Judiciary 

A BILL 

To require reports on agency rules with criminal penalties 

for the violation thereof, to evaluate the necessity and 

prudence of such rules remaining in effect. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Regulatory Reporting 

5 Act of 2015’’. 


emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 4003 IH

1 SEC. 2. REPORT TO CONGRESS ON REGULATIONS WITH 

2 CRIMINAL PENALTIES. 

3 Not later than 1 year after the date of enactment 

4 of this Act, the head of each Federal agency, in consulta5 tion with the Attorney General, shall submit to the Com6 mittee on the Judiciary of the House of Representatives 

7 and the Committee on the Judiciary of the Senate a report 

8 that lists each rule of that agency that, if violated, may 

9 be punished by criminal penalties. The report shall in10 clude, for each such rule, a justification as to why those 

11 criminal penalties are necessary based on the following cri12 teria: 

13 (1) Why civil penalties are inadequate to deter 

14 the regulated behavior. 

15 (2) What mens rea or criminal intent is re16 quired for criminal liability arising from a violation 

17 of the rule. 

18 (3) What notice is provided to persons subject 

19 to the rule that a violation of the rule may result in 

20 criminal penalties. 

21 (4) If the rule applies to all persons, including 

22 natural persons as well as corporations and other 

23 business associations. 

24 (5) If a violation of the rule is likely to result 

25 in any of the following (and if so, how): 


emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with BILLS
3 

•HR 4003 IH

1 (A) Substantial bodily injury or death to 

2 another person. 

3 (B) Property damage or destruction. 

4 (C) Harm to public safety. 

5 (D) Harm to national security. 

6 (E) Fraud against the United States. 

Æ 


emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with BILLS
HILLS BANCORPORATION
                                   EXHIBIT II
                    COMPUTATION OF EARNINGS PER COMMON SHARE


                                                            Three months ended
                                                                 March 31
                                                           ---------------------
                                                             2002        2001
                                                           ---------------------

Weighted average number of shares outstanding
  (basic) ..........................................       1,498,558   1,495,483

Weighted average of potential dilutive shares
  attributable to stock options granted computed
  under the treasury stock method ..................          12,879      13,250
                                                           ---------------------

Weighted average number of shares (diluted) ........       1,511,437   1,508,733
                                                           =====================

Earnings Per Share:
   Net income (in thousands) .......................       $   2,623   $   2,307
                                                           =====================
Earnings per common share:
  Basic ............................................       $ 1.75         $ 1.54
  Diluted ..........................................         1.74           1.53



                                        1
### §2408. Repealed. Pub. L. 95–424, title VI, §604, Oct. 6, 1978, 92 Stat. 961

Section, Pub. L. 87–195, pt. III, §649, as added Pub. L. 89–171, pt. III, §303(d), Sept. 6, 1965, 79 Stat. 661, related to aggregate of total amounts authorized to be appropriated under this chapter.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date of Repeal

Repeal effective Oct. 1, 1978, see section 605 of Pub. L. 95–424, set out as an Effective Date of 1978 Amendment note under section 2151 of this title.
#### § 429.108 What happens if I accept an award, compromise, or settlement under this subpart?

If you, your agent, or your legal representative accept any award, compromise, or settlement under this subpart, your acceptance is final and conclusive on you, your agent or representative, and any other person on whose behalf or for whose benefit the claim was filed. The acceptance constitutes a complete release of any claim against the United States and against any employee of the Government whose act or omission gave rise to the claim, by reason of the same subject matter.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY HIGH

 14,358

 13,316

 12,078

 10,996

 9,288

 9,892

 9,605

 9,894

 9,546

 9,867

 9,388

 8,290

 7,157

 7,140

 7,016

 6,943

 6,446

 5,089

 3,427

 3,225

 3,857

 5,743

 7,620

 8,462

 7,830

 8,186

 9,915

 9,663

 8,976

 7,578

 6,583

 3,025

 2,716

 2,715

 2,671

 2,549

 2,806

 2,755

 2,666

 2,167

 1,662

 1,246

 1,109

 1,025

 1,022

 1,002

 1,026

 1,130

 1,066

 904

 839

 736

 760

 748

 820

 825

 750

 876

 1,023

 1,144

 1,023

 956

 7,321

 6,764

 6,462

 6,140

 5,575

 5,298

 5,052

 4,826

 4,384

 3,995

 3,438

 2,913

 2,635

 2,613

 2,682

 2,867

 3,135

 2,601

 2,029

 1,638

 1,485

 1,729

 2,504

 2,828

 2,598

 2,753

 3,507

 3,611

 3,270

 2,808

 2,480

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

AUGUST 2019 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: September 10, 2019

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

PITTSBURG BOTTOM ON THE SACRAMENTO RIVER
(No. 74-CC-219

#### William O. Stewart, Claimant, *vs.*State of Illinois, Superintendent of Public Instruction, Respondent.

*Opinion filed February 28, 1974.*

William O. Stewart, Claimant, pro se.

*256William J. Scott, Attorney General; Edward L. S. Arkema, Jr., Assistant Attorney General, for Respondent.

Per Curiam.
# C_2016045EN.01010001.xml

| 5.2.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 45/100 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

5.2.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 45/100

---

P7_TA(2013)0121

Tied vote on intervention in legal proceedings (interpretation of Rule 159(3))

European Parliament decision of 16 April 2013 concerning circumstances in which there is a tied vote on intervention in legal proceedings (interpretation of Rule 159(3))

(2016/C 045/19)

The European Parliament,

The European Parliament,

| — | having regard to the letter of 20 March 2013 from the Chair of the Committee on Constitutional Affairs, |
| --- | --- |

—

having regard to the letter of 20 March 2013 from the Chair of the Committee on Constitutional Affairs,

| — | having regard to Rule 211 of its Rules of Procedure, |
| --- | --- |

—

having regard to Rule 211 of its Rules of Procedure,

| 1. | Decides to append the following interpretation to Rule 159(3):
  ‘Rule 159(3) is to be interpreted as meaning that, where there is a tied vote on a draft recommendation under Rule 128(4) not to intervene in proceedings before the Court of Justice of the European Union, such a tie does not signify the adoption of a recommendation that Parliament should intervene in those proceedings. In such a case, the committee responsible is to be deemed not to have expressed any recommendation.’; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Decides to append the following interpretation to Rule 159(3):

‘Rule 159(3) is to be interpreted as meaning that, where there is a tied vote on a draft recommendation under Rule 128(4) not to intervene in proceedings before the Court of Justice of the European Union, such a tie does not signify the adoption of a recommendation that Parliament should intervene in those proceedings. In such a case, the committee responsible is to be deemed not to have expressed any recommendation.’;

| 2. | Instructs its President to forward this decision to the Council and the Commission, for information. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Instructs its President to forward this decision to the Council and the Commission, for information.

---
# C o u rt o f

A p p ea ls

o f t h e S t a te o f

G eo rg ia

ATLANTA,_

_ _ __ _ _ __ _ __ _ _ _ _ _ __ _

Th e Co u rt

o f Ap p ea l s h er eb y p a s s es t h e f

o ll owi n g o r der :

A1 6 A1 08 0 . DEBRA ANNE GARY v . BRUCE CHATMAN, W ARDEN.

Deb ra An n e Gary fi l ed an act i o n s eek i n g d am ag es an d t h e rei n s t at em en t o f h er

v i s i t at i o n p r i v il eg es aft er s h e was arres t ed wh il e try i n g t o vi s i t h er i n carcerat ed

h u s b an d

. Sh e fi l ed a Mo t i o n t o Pro ceed W i t h o u t Prep ay m en t o f Fees

, wh ich t h e t ri al

co u rt d en i ed o n A u gu s t 1 8

, 2 0 1 5

. Gary s u bs eq u en t l y fi l ed a m o t i o n f o r

reco n s i d erat i on

. Th e t ri al co u rt d en ied G ary ’ s m o t i o n fo r reco n s i der a t i o n o n Sep tem b er 1 0

, 2 01 5

. Gary fi l ed h er n o t i ce of ap p eal o n Oct ob er 1 4

, 2 0 1 5

. 1 H o wev er,

we l ack ju ri s d i ct i on

. A n o t i ce o f ap p eal m

u s t b e fi l ed wi th i n 3 0 d a ys aft er en t ry o f an ap p eal ab l e

o rd er. OCGA § 5 -6 -3 8 (a). Th e p ro p er an d t i m el y fi l i n g o f a n o t i ce o f ap p eal i s an

ab s o lu t e req u i rem en t t o co n fer ju ri s di ct i on o n t h is Co u r t

. S e e C o uch v. Un i t ed

Pa p er wo r ker s In t l

. Un i o n , 2 2 4 Ga. Ap p

. 7 21

, 7 21 (4 82 SE2 d 7 04 ) (1 9 9 7 ). Th e d en i al

o f a m o t i o n fo r reco n s i d erat i o n i s no t d i rect ly ap p eal ab le. See Bel l v. Co h r a n , 2 4 4

Ga. Ap p

. 5 1 0

, 5 1 1 (5 3 6 SE2 d 1 8 7 ) (2 0 0 0 ). An d t he fi l i n g o f s uch a m o t i o n d o es n ot

ex t en d th e t i m e fo r ap p eal i n g t h e u n d erl y i n g j u d gm en t

– h ere, t h e o rd er d en y i n g h er

M o t i on t o Pro ceed W i th o u t Prep ay m e n t o f F e es

. See i d

. G ary ’ s n o ti ce o f ap p eal

,

t h erefo re, i s i nv al i d as t o t h e o rd er d en y i ng h er m o ti o n fo r reco n s id erat i o n an d

u n t i m el y as t o th e o rd er d en y i n g h er M o t i o n to Pro ceed W i t h o u t Prep ay m en t o f Fees

. Ac c o r d i n g l y , we lack ju ri s d i ct i o n t o co n s i d er t h i s ap p eal

, wh ich i s h ereb y

DISM ISSED.

1 G ary ori gi n al l y fi l ed h er ap p eal i n th e Geo rg i a Su p rem e Co u rt

, w h i c h

t ran s ferred t he cas e t o t h i s Co u rt

. March 16, 2016C o u r t o f A p p e a l s o f t h e S t a t e o

f G e o r g ia

C le r k ’ s O f f i c e

, A t la n t a

,

_

_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ I c e r ti fy t h a t t h e a b o v e is a tr u e e x t r a c t f r o m

t h e m i n u t e s o

f t h e C o u r t o

f A p p e a l s o f G e o r g i a

. W i tn e s s m y s i g n a t u r e a n d t h e s e a l o

f s a i d c o u r t

h e r e t o a f f i x e d t h e d a y a n d y e a r l a s t a b o v e w r i t t e n

.

, C l e r k

. 03/16/2016
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

DAY HIGH

 10,530

 10,514

 10,507

 10,495

 10,483

 10,473

 10,458

 10,446

 10,437

 10,417

 10,412

 10,389

 10,374

 10,354

 10,333

 10,310

 10,305

 10,285

 10,265

 10,248

 10,231

 10,210

 10,199

 10,183

 8,238

 4,914

 3,121

 1,870

 1,143

 10,510

 10,497

 10,488

 10,478

 10,454

 10,445

 10,431

 10,425

 10,409

 10,397

 10,379

 10,364

 10,347

 10,322

 10,306

 10,295

 10,274

 10,254

 10,239

 10,225

 10,204

 10,194

 10,164

 8,427

 4,989

 3,186

 1,912

 1,157

 736

 10,520

 10,507

 10,497

 10,488

 10,472

 10,461

 10,448

 10,435

 10,421

 10,407

 10,393

 10,377

 10,360

 10,336

 10,320

 10,303

 10,289

 10,273

 10,254

 10,239

 10,221

 10,203

 10,183

 9,715

 6,404

 4,009

 2,481

 1,475

 924

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

FEBRUARY 2000 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: March 23, 2000

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

PORT CHICAGO BOTTOM IN SUISUN BAY