alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit
32.2





Multiband
Corporation





Certification
Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350


As
Adopted Pursuant to


Section
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002





In connection with this Quarterly
Report Form 10-Q, Multiband Corporation (the Company) for the period ended June
30, 2010, I, Steven M. Bell, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





1.
            This
      Periodic Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
      15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d));
      and


2.
            The
      information contained in the Periodic Report fairly presents, in all
      material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
      the Company.








Date:
      August 12, 2010
            By:
            /s/
      Steven M. BellChief
      Financial Officer
EXHIBIT 21.1

SUBSIDIARIES OF BLACKROCK CAPITAL INVESTMENT CORPORATION



|                      |  |              |          | 
|--------------------- |  | ------------ | -------- | 
|Name                  |  | Jurisdiction |         
|BKC ARS Blocker, Inc. |  |              | Delaware | 
|BKC ASW Blocker, Inc. |  |              | Delaware | 
|BCIC-MBS, LLC         |  |              | Delaware | 

In addition, we may be deemed to control certain portfolio companies identified as Controlled
Investments in footnotes to the Consolidated Schedule of Investments at December 31, 2016 included in the Consolidated Financial Statements portion of BlackRock Capital Investment Corporations
Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2016.
(No. 4163

#### Ed Witt, Claimant, *vs.*State *of*Illinois, Respondent.

*Opinion filed July 8, 1949.*

Ed Witt, Claimant, pro se.

Ivan A. Elliott, Attorney General; C. Arthur Rebel, Assistant Attorney General, for Respondent.

Schuman, C. J.

Claimant, Ed Witt, filed complaint pro se. Claimant, Ed Witt, was employed by the State of Illinois, Depart*11ment of Public Works and Buildings, Division of Highways, on April 6, 1942 as a common laborer.

On October 20, 1948, the claimant was engaged in mowing vegetation with a power driven mower on S.B.I. Route 4 in Champaign County. While engaged in said work, the mower bar struck an obstruction and caused the mower bar to fold back toward the machine. Claimant attempted to pull the bar into place, the sickle moved, catching and severing his right index finger one-quarter inch distal to the knuckle joint.

Claimant was taken to Dr. H. C. Bowser in Sidney, who sent him to the Burnham City Hospital in Champaign. The finger was amputated at the knuckle joint. The claimant lost the middle and terminal phalanges of right index finger.

The Division of Highways report and the complaint filed by the claimant show that the Division of Highways had immediate notice of the accident and that the claim was filed in conformity with and in time under the terms and provisions of the Workmen’s Compensation Act.

The evidence shows that at the time of the accident, the claimant was receiving $180.00 a month, and while it is not shown that these were actual earnings for a year immediately preceding the accident, it is presumed that such is the fact.

Prom the evidence, the claimant would be entitled to temporary total disability from October 21, 1948 to November 18, 1948. However, not more than 30 days having been lost as a result of said injury, his compensation would not start until after the 8th day from said injury, which would be on October 28, 1948. Claimant would therefore be entitled to compensation for 13 days or 1 6/7 weeks for temporary disability or an amount of $36.21.

*12After having lost two phalanges from the right in-' dex finger, he would be entitled to a loss of a whole finger which is 40 weeks at $19.50 or a total amount of $780.00.

An award is therefore entered in the amount of $816.21. The evidence shows that during the period of temporary disability, the claimant was paid the sum of $117.88, or his full salary. From-the total award should be. deducted the sum of $117.88, representing an overpayment of money paid by respondent to claimant for temporary total compensation, leaving a balance of $698.33 for which an award is hereby entered in favor of claimant. All of this amount has accrued and is payable forthwith.

This award is subject to the approval of. the Governor as provided in Section 3 of “An Act concerning the payment of compensation awards to State employees.”
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

DAY HIGH

 9,047

 8,494

 8,042

 6,801

 5,487

 3,510

 3,271

 3,279

 3,392

 15,225

 15,431

 16,948

 16,183

 15,153

 13,326

 14,433

 13,814

 12,555

 11,833

 11,422

 10,767

 10,584

 9,570

 9,775

 10,952

 11,599

 12,474

 14,649

 15,479

 15,591

 2,915

 2,696

 2,628

 2,195

 1,848

 1,494

 1,500

 1,701

 1,614

 1,597

 6,456

 6,253

 6,676

 6,154

 5,115

 4,689

 4,146

 4,017

 3,840

 3,687

 3,822

 3,836

 3,359

 3,212

 2,831

 2,927

 3,221

 3,301

 3,803

 4,313

 5,320

 5,355

 4,739

 3,940

 3,095

 2,369

 2,383

 2,493

 2,482

 6,631

 10,309

 10,629

 10,607

 10,007

 9,284

 8,542

 8,217

 7,669

 7,285

 6,868

 7,087

 6,882

 5,996

 5,697

 5,868

 6,502

 7,150

 7,900

 9,018

 9,787

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

SEPTEMBER 2010 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: October 15, 2010

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

PITTSBURG BOTTOM ON THE SACRAMENTO RIVER
Electrical Conductivity, UMHOS

Day High Low Mean

1 92 87 91

2 93 86 91

3 96 89 93

4 100 92 97

5 100 96 99

6 101 97 100

7 100 96 98

8 97 94 96

9 95 91 94

10 94 92 93

11 94 93 93

12 94 93 93

13 94 93 94

14 95 94 94

15 95 94 94

16 95 93 94

17 94 93 93

18 94 92 93

19 97 93 95

20 101 96 98

21 101 97 100

22 101 97 100

23 102 100 101

24 102 90 99

25 100 94 97

26 105 94 100

27 111 101 106

28 117 107 110

29 118 110 113

30 119 112 115

COMMENT(S):

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

Historical Archive and Report Database

San Andreas On The San Joaquin River 

Period: June 2023 Run Date: 7/10/2023
### §1465aa. Findings and purposes

The Congress finds and declares that—

(1) it is the policy of the United States to support the right of the people of Cuba to seek, receive, and impart information and ideas through any media and regardless of frontiers, in accordance with article 19 of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights;

(2) consonant with this policy, television broadcasting to Cuba may be effective in furthering the open communication of accurate information and ideas to the people of Cuba and, in particular, information about Cuba;

(3) television broadcasting to Cuba, operated in a manner not inconsistent with the broad foreign policy of the United States and in accordance with high professional standards, would be in the national interest;

(4) facilities broadcasting television programming to Cuba must be operated in a manner consistent with applicable regulations of the Federal Communications Commission, and must not affect the quality of domestic broadcast transmission or reception; and

(5) that 1 the Voice of America already broadcasts to Cuba information that represents America, not any single segment of American society, and includes a balanced and comprehensive projection of significant American thought and institutions, but that there is a need for television broadcasts to Cuba which provide news, commentary, and other information about events in Cuba and elsewhere to promote the cause of freedom in Cuba.

(Pub. L. 101–246, title II, §242, Feb. 16, 1990, 104 Stat. 58.)

#### Repeal of Section

Section repealed upon transmittal of determination by President under section 6063(c)(3) of this title that democratically elected government in Cuba is in power, see section 6037(c) of this title.

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section was enacted as part of the Television Broadcasting to Cuba Act which comprises this subchapter, and not as part of the United States Information and Educational Exchange Act of 1948 which comprises this chapter.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Short Title

Pub. L. 101–246, title II, §241, Feb. 16, 1990, 104 Stat. 58, provided that: "This part [part D (§§241–248) of title II of Pub. L. 101–246, enacting this subchapter, amending section 1465c of this title, and enacting provisions set out as notes under section 1465c of this title] may be cited as the 'Television Broadcasting to Cuba Act'."

1 So in original. The word "that" probably should not appear.
### §283z–4. Amendments to Articles of Agreement in resolution on Merger of Interregional and Ordinary Capital Resources

The United States Governor of the Inter-American Development Bank is hereby authorized to agree to and to accept the amendments to the Articles of Agreement in the proposed resolution entitled "Merger of Inter-regional and Ordinary Capital Resources".

(Pub. L. 86–147, §32, as added Pub. L. 100–202, §101(e) [title I], Dec. 22, 1987, 101 Stat. 1329–131, 1329–134.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section 32 of Pub. L. 86–147 is based on section 501 of title V of H.R. 3750, One Hundredth Congress, as introduced Dec. 11, 1987, and enacted into law by Pub. L. 100–202.
<PAGE>   1
                      [KPMG PEAT MARWICK LLP LETTERHEAD]


Mr. Robert Murphy
Cuisine Solutions, Inc.
85 South Bragg Street
Suite 600
Alexandria, Virginia 22312


October 28, 1998


Dear Mr. Murphy:

This is to confirm that the client-auditor relationship between Cuisine
Solutions, Inc. and KPMG Peat Marwick LLP has ceased.

Very truly yours.

/s/ KPMG PEAT MARWICK LLP

cc: Chief Accountant, Securities and Exchange Commission
    Carl Youngman, Chairman of the Audit Committee, Cuisine Solutions, Inc.
### §2421d. Funding for capital projects

#### (a) Funding level

The Congress strongly urges the President to use at least $650,000,000 for fiscal year 1993 and at least $700,000,000 for fiscal year 1994 of the total amounts made available for assistance under chapter 4 of part II of the Foreign Assistance Act of 1961 [22 U.S.C. 2346 et seq.] (relating to the economic support fund), assistance under the Support for East European Democracy (SEED) Act of 1989 [22 U.S.C. 5401 et seq.], assistance under the Freedom for Russia and Emerging Eurasian Democracies and Open Markets Support Act of 1992, and assistance under the Multilateral Assistance Initiative for the Philippines, for grants for developmentally sound capital projects. Such grants may be combined with financing offered by private financial entities or other entities.

#### (b) Development assistance capital projects

Funds appropriated to carry out chapter 1 or chapter 10 of part I of the Foreign Assistance Act of 1961 [22 U.S.C. 2151 et seq., 2293 et seq.] (relating to development assistance and the Development Fund for Africa) may not be used for capital projects that do not meet the criteria contained in section 2421b of this title. This subsection does not apply with respect to capital projects for which funds have been obligated or expended before October 28, 1992.

(Pub. L. 102–549, title III, §306, Oct. 28, 1992, 106 Stat. 3660.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

The Foreign Assistance Act of 1961, referred to in subsecs. (a) and (b), is Pub. L. 87–195, Sept. 4, 1961, 75 Stat. 424. Chapter 10 of part I of the Act is classified generally to part X (§2293 et seq.) of subchapter I of chapter 32 of this title. Chapter 4 of part II of the Act is classified generally to part IV (§2346 et seq.) of subchapter II of chapter 32 of this title. For complete classification of this Act to the Code, see Short Title note set out under section 2151 of this title and Tables.

The Support for East European Democracy (SEED) Act of 1989, referred to in subsec. (a), is Pub. L. 101–179, Nov. 28, 1989, 103 Stat. 1298, which is classified principally to chapter 63 (§5401 et seq.) of this title. For complete classification of this Act to the Code, see Short Title note set out under section 5401 of this title and Tables.

The Freedom for Russia and Emerging Eurasian Democracies and Open Markets Support Act of 1992, referred to in subsec. (a), is Pub. L. 102–511, Oct. 24, 1992, 106 Stat. 3320. For complete classification of this Act to the Code, see Short Title note set out under section 5801 of this title and Tables.

#### Codification

Section was enacted as part of the Aid, Trade, and Competitiveness Act of 1992 and also as part of the Jobs Through Exports Act of 1992, and not as part of the Foreign Assistance Act of 1961 which comprises this chapter.
### §2292a–1. Appropriated funds; Presidential reports to Committees on Appropriations of the Senate and the House

The President shall submit quarterly reports to the Committee on Appropriations of the United States Senate and to the Committee on Appropriations of the House of Representatives on the programing and obligation of funds appropriated for International Disaster Assistance.

(Pub. L. 94–330, title I, §100, June 30, 1976, 90 Stat. 773.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section was not enacted as part of the Foreign Assistance Act of 1961 which comprises this chapter.
**EXHIBIT 12.1**

 

**COMPUTATION OF RATIO OF EARNINGSTO FIXED CHARGES**

 

**PURSUANT TO SEC REPORTINGREQUIREMENTS**(1)

(Millions of Dollars)

 
| ** **                          | ** ** | **Six Months Ended** | ** ** |
|-------------------------------------|------------|----------------------|------------|
| ** **                          | ** ** | **June 30**     | ** ** |
| ** **                          | ** ** | **2006**             | ** ** | **2005** | ** ** |
|                                |       |                 |       |   |   |
| FIXED CHARGES                       |       |                 |       |   |   |
| Interest expense                    | ** ** | **$**                | **73.3**   |   | $ | 43.1 |   |
| Portion of  rentals deemed interest | ** ** | **.8**               |       | .7 |   |
|                                |       |                 |       |   |   |
| TOTAL FIXED CHARGES                 | ** ** | **$**                | **74.1**   |   | $ | 43.8 |   |
|                                |       |                 |       |   |   |
| EARNINGS                            |       |                 |       |   |   |
| Income before  income taxes         | ** ** | **$**                | **66.6**   |   | $ | 58.4 |   |
| Fixed charges                       | ** ** | **74.1**             |       | 43.8 |   |
|                                |       |                 |       |   |   |
| EARNINGS AS DEFINED                 | ** ** | **$**                | **140.7**  |   | $ | 102.2 |   |
|                                |       |                 |       |   |   |
| RATIO OF EARNINGS TO FIXED CHARGES  | ** ** | **1.90**             | **X**      | 2.33 | X |

 

----

(1) The method of computing the ratio of earnings to fixed chargesshown above complies with SEC reporting requirements but differs from themethod called for in the Support Agreement between the Company and PACCAR asshown in Exhibit 12.2.

 

1

----
EXHIBIT 21.1

AMERICAN TIRE DISTRIBUTORS HOLDINGS, INC.

Chart of Subsidiaries



|                                          |  |                       
|----------------------------------------- |  | ----------------------
|Company                                   |  | State of Incorporation
|                                          | 
|American Tire Distributors Holdings, Inc. |  | Delaware              
|American Tire Distributors, Inc.          |  | Delaware              
|The Speed Merchant, Inc.                  |  | California            
|T.O. Haas Tire Company, Inc.              |  | Nebraska              
|Am-Pac Tire Dist. Inc                     |  | California            
|Tire Pros Francorp                        |  | California
#### Charles Ludwig, Respondent, v. State Mutual Life Assurance Company of Worcester, Massachusetts, et al., Appellants.

Judgment unanimously affirmed, with costs. No opinion. Present — Peek, P. J., Dore, Cohn, Callahan and Shientag, JJ.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-23-2001
<PERIOD-START>                             JUN-25-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-16-2000
<CASH>                                       (184,000)
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                5,227,000
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                  6,284,000
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            12,904,000
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              23,888,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        5,479,000
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       156,000
<OTHER-SE>                                  28,276,000
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                23,888,000
<SALES>                                      8,343,000
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             8,343,000
<CGS>                                        6,363,000
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                2,141,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                30,000
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                            (40,000)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (171,000)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          (171,000)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (171,000)
<EPS-BASIC>                                          0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0


</TABLE>
### §§2652, 2652a. Repealed. Pub. L. 103–236, title I, §162(a), (b), Apr. 30, 1994, 108 Stat. 405

Section 2652, May 26, 1949, ch. 143, §1, 63 Stat. 111; Feb. 7, 1953. ch. 2, 67 Stat. 4; Aug. 5, 1955, ch. 576, §1, 69 Stat. 536; June 30, 1958, Pub. L. 85–477, ch. V, §502(j)(1), 72 Stat. 274; July 18, 1958, Pub. L. 85–524, §1, 72 Stat. 363; July 13, 1972, Pub. L. 92–352, title I, §103(a)(1), 86 Stat. 490; Aug. 17, 1977, Pub. L. 95–105, title I, §109(c), 91 Stat. 847; Oct. 7, 1978, Pub. L. 95–426, title I, §114(a)(1), 92 Stat. 968; Aug. 16, 1985, Pub. L. 99–93, title I, §§115(a), 116(a), 99 Stat. 411; Aug. 27, 1986, Pub. L. 99–399, title I, §104(b), 100 Stat. 856, established positions in Department of State of Deputy Secretary of State, Under Secretary of State for Political Affairs, Under Secretary of State for Economic and Agricultural Affairs, Under Secretary of State for Management, and Assistant Secretaries of State.

Section 2652a, Pub. L. 95–426, title I, §115(a), Oct. 7, 1978, 92 Stat. 969, established position in Department of State of Assistant Secretary of State for International Narcotics Matters.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date of Repeal

Repeal applicable with respect to officials, offices, and bureaus of Department of State when executive orders, regulations, or departmental directives implementing the amendments by sections 161 and 162 of Pub. L. 103–236 become effective, or 90 days after Apr. 30, 1994, whichever comes earlier, see section 161(b) of Pub. L. 103–236, as amended, set out as an Effective Date of 1994 Amendment note under section 2651a of this title.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

DAY ELEV

 1,032.90

 1,033.62

 1,033.30

 1,032.86

 1,032.21

 1,031.38

 1,030.82

 1,030.38

 1,030.38

 1,030.36

 1,030.53

 1,030.82

 1,031.16

 1,031.48

 1,032.02

 1,032.54

 1,033.16

 1,033.70

 1,034.26

 1,034.75

 1,035.23

 1,035.61

 1,036.04

 1,036.46

 1,036.99

 1,037.59

 1,039.44

 1,041.57

 3,607.3

 3,625.8

 3,617.6

 3,606.3

 3,589.7

 3,568.5

 3,554.3

 3,543.1

 3,543.1

 3,542.6

 3,546.9

 3,554.3

 3,562.9

 3,571.0

 3,584.8

 3,598.1

 3,614.0

 3,627.9

 3,642.3

 3,655.0

 3,667.4

 3,677.3

 3,688.5

 3,699.4

 3,713.3

 3,729.0

 3,777.8

 3,834.2

STORAGE

+21.2

+18.5

-8.2

-11.3

-16.6

-21.2

-14.2

-11.2

+0.0

-0.5

+4.3

+7.3

+8.6

+8.1

+13.8

+13.3

+15.9

+13.9

+14.4

+12.7

+12.4

+9.9

+11.2

+11.0

+13.8

+15.7

+48.8

+56.5

CHANGE

 20,425

 20,867

 18,601

 22,858

 20,121

 18,314

 17,019

 15,487

 14,375

 13,603

 12,781

 12,550

 11,951

 10,023

 10,634

 10,000

 10,968

 9,623

 9,647

 8,632

 8,493

 7,275

 7,768

 7,794

 9,088

 10,157

 30,005

 38,135

INFLOW

 9,641

 11,507

 13,649

 16,874

 16,464

 17,061

 17,095

 16,641

 14,212

 13,688

 10,482

 8,733

 7,516

 5,803

 3,587

 3,238

 2,905

 2,597

 2,346

 2,148

 2,140

 2,223

 2,020

 2,175

 2,044

 2,155

 5,373

 9,541

POWER

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

SPILL

 0

 0

 9,087

 11,650

 11,984

 11,795

 7,042

 4,407

 14

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

OUTLET

 75

 30

 15

 30

 60

 127

 60

 60

 149

 171

 127

 112

 82

 112

 113

 53

 53

 23

 23

 99

 84

 76

 115

 92

 69

 69

 47

 125

C.F.S.

 .10

 .04

 .02

 .04

 .08

 .17

 .08

 .08

 .20

 .23

 .17

 .15

 .11

 .15

 .15

 .07

 .07

 .03

 .03

 .13

 .11

 .10

 .15

 .12

 .09

 .09

 .06

 .16

INCHES

 .55

 .90

 .09

 .30

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .40

 .10

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 3.30

 2.57

PRECIP

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

FEBRUARY 2006 SHASTA LAKE DAILY OPERATIONS RUN DATE: July 17, 2006

IN LAKE

EVAPORATION

INCHES

C.F.S.

COMPUTED*

1000 ACRE-FEET

RELEASE - C.F.S.

RIVER

TOTALS +248.1 407,194 223,858 0 55,979 2,251 2.98 8.21

ACRE-FEET +248,100 807,669 444,022 0 111,034 4,465

COMMENTS:

* COMPUTED INFLOW IS THE SUM OF CHANGE IN STORAGE, RELEASES AND EVAPORATION.

SUMMARY

RELEASE (ACRE-FEET)

POWER 444,022

SPILL 0

OUTLET

TOTAL

 111,034

 555,056

PRECIPITATION

THIS MONTH =

TO DATE =

 8.21

JULY 1, 2005 55.60

 3,586.1

Table 3
Exhibit 32.2





CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL
OFFICER REGARDING PERIODIC REPORT CONTAINING 
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS



I, Paul E. Martin, the Principal Financial Officer of Enstar Income Program 1984-1, L.P. (the "Partnership") in compliance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, hereby certify that, the Partnership's amended Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q/A for the period ended September 30, 2003 (the "Report") filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission:

- fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
- the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

/s/  Paul E. MartinPaul E. MartinPrincipal Financial OfficerDecember 8, 2003