alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<page>
EXHIBIT 32.01


CERTIFICATION OF PRESIDENT PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




In connection with the Quarterly Report of Morgan Stanley
Cornerstone Fund III L.P. (the "Partnership") on Form 10-Q for the
quarter ended September 30, 2008, as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Walter
Davis, President of Demeter Management Corporation, the general
partner of the Partnership, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:
(1)	The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
(2)	The information contained in the Report fairly presents,
in all material respects, the financial condition and
results of operations of the Partnership.







By:	  /s/	Walter Davis

Name:		Walter Davis
Title:	President of Demeter Management Corporation,
			the general partner of the Partnership

Date:		November 14, 2008
§ 411.395 Is a State VR agency required to provide periodic reports? ( a ) For cases where a State VR agency provided services functioning as an EN, the State VR agency will be required to prepare periodic reports on the specific outcomes achieved with respect to the specific services the State VR agency provided to or secured for disabled beneficiaries whose tickets it accepted for assignment. These reports must be submitted to the PM at least annually.
( b ) Regardless of the payment method selected, a State VR agency must submit information to assist the PM conducting the reviews necessary to assess a beneficiary's timely progress toward self-supporting employment to determine if a beneficiary is using a ticket for purposes of suspending continuing disability reviews (see §§ 411.190, 411.195 and 411.200).
Request for Information FAA-2015-8663 

9-AWA-AVS-333Exemptions (FAA) 

Dear Mr. Hilgenberg: 

This letter is in regards to your amendment to exemption request Federal Aviation Regulatory Docket 

No. FAA­2015­8663.

The amendment requests to operate the SHOTOVER U1. With full payload, this unmanned aircraft 

(UA) has a maximum take­off weight of 66 lbs. If the petitioner’s intent is to operate this UA above the 

weight of 55 lbs the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) requires the additional information not 

addressed in the SHOTOVER manual to process your petition.

x A detailed description of the aircraft design and configuration for the SHOTOVER U1 UAS 

focusing on the UAS features and flight characteristics to include, but not limited to:

o Detailed 3 view drawings with scale of the aircraft and any launch and recovery 

equipment if applicable

o Operational history with supporting statistics; particularly where Austin Hilgenberg was 

the principal operator

o Results of analysis and flight testing of UAS

o Lessons learned from repairs and alterations performed during operations to include 

design changes and fixes due to operational failure(s)

o Details of any injuries or property damage resulting from flight/ground operations

o Safety analysis of any failure modes such as lost link, fly­away, loss of control, etc.

x Copies of manuals, photographs, videos/telemetry may be provided as support

x Any other information to support an analysis of operational safety with unmanned aircraft in 

excess of 55 lbs.

Please submit the additional information (non­proprietary) to your docket at www.regulations.gov .

Once your information is submitted, please save your tracking number and submit your tracking 

number along with the information submitted to the docket, and any proprietary information 

electronically via e­mail to 333exemptions@faa.gov.

If you want us to process your request any further, we must receive the information described above by 

12/05/2016. If we do not receive the information, we will close the docket without notifying you further.

FAA Office of Rulemaking

Sent: Monday, November 21, 2016 1:04 PM 

To: Austin@atopshot.com

Request for Information FAA-2015-8663 Page 1 of 1

https://email.dot.gov/owa/9-AWA-AVS-333Exemptions@faa.gov/?ae=Item&t=IPM.Not... 11/21/2016
#### § 431.118 Applications and proposals lacking definite plans for involvement of human subjects.

Certain types of applications for grants, cooperative agreements, or contracts are submitted to Federal departments or agencies with the knowledge that subjects may be involved within the period of support, but definite plans would not normally be set forth in the application or proposal. These include activities such as institutional type grants when selection of specific projects is the institution's responsibility; research training grants in which the activities involving subjects remain to be selected; and projects in which human subjects' involvement will depend upon completion of instruments, prior animal studies, or purification of compounds. Except for research waived under § 431.101(i) or exempted under § 431.104, no human subjects may be involved in any project supported by these awards until the project has been reviewed and approved by the IRB, as provided in this policy, and certification submitted, by the institution, to the Federal department or agency component supporting the research.
### §246. Repealed. June 25, 1948, ch. 645, §21, 62 Stat. 862, eff. Sept. 1, 1948

Section, act July 8, 1918, ch. 138, 40 Stat. 821, related to wearing of foreign nation's uniform without authority. See section 703 of Title 18, Crimes and Criminal Procedure.
##### 



Exhibit 99.2


EXHIBITCuisine Solutions continues its reorganization and announces further reduction
in headcount at its US operation and Corporate head office in Alexandria,
Virginia

Alexandria, VA (May 20, 2003)  In its effort to further reduce its operational
cost at its US operation and minimize its overhead to meet the current
challenge of the industry, the Company announced the further downsizing of its
Corporate headquarter as well as a 15% reduction of its workforce in its plant
in Alexandria, Virginia.

The Company regrets to announce the departure of Robert Murphy, COO of
Cuisine Solutions. Robert Murphy has greatly helped the Company in its
reorganization and restructuring effort in the last four years and will be
missed, says Stanislas Vilgrain.

Stanislas Vilgrain, President and CEO of Cuisine Solutions, will assume
both positions to lead the global restructuring.

Separately, Mr. David Jordan has resigned from the Board of Directors of
Cuisine Solutions due to his new demanding professional responsibilities within
Pepsi Cola.

Headquartered in Alexandria, VA, Cuisine Solutions is an award-winning
innovator of chef-created, high quality entrées and sauces. With production
facilities in Europe, North and South America, the company provides quality
solutions worldwide to the banquet, transportation, restaurant and retail
industries. The Company is publicly held and listed on the OTC-BB at CUIS.OB.
Visit Cuisine Solutions online at www.cuisinesolutions.com.

# # #
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

DAY ELEV

 1,044.73

 1,045.07

 1,045.51

 1,045.84

 1,046.27

 1,046.55

 1,046.39

 1,046.19

 1,045.93

 1,045.66

 1,045.44

 1,045.25

 1,045.26

 1,045.20

 1,045.15

 1,045.17

 1,045.28

 1,045.53

 1,045.98

 1,046.66

 1,047.27

 1,047.82

 1,048.36

 1,048.64

 1,048.95

 1,049.28

 1,049.49

 1,049.61

 1,049.76

 1,049.88

 3,918.9

 3,928.1

 3,940.1

 3,949.0

 3,960.7

 3,968.3

 3,964.0

 3,958.5

 3,951.4

 3,944.1

 3,938.2

 3,933.0

 3,933.3

 3,931.7

 3,930.3

 3,930.8

 3,933.8

 3,940.6

 3,952.8

 3,971.3

 3,988.0

 4,003.0

 4,017.9

 4,025.6

 4,034.1

 4,043.2

 4,049.0

 4,052.3

 4,056.5

 4,059.8

STORAGE

+13.8

+9.2

+11.9

+8.9

+11.7

+7.6

-4.4

-5.4

-7.1

-7.3

-6.0

-5.2

+0.3

-1.6

-1.4

+0.5

+3.0

+6.8

+12.2

+18.5

+16.7

+15.1

+14.8

+7.7

+8.5

+9.1

+5.8

+3.3

+4.1

+3.3

CHANGE

 8,997

 8,325

 9,503

 8,386

 9,200

 7,294

 8,177

 8,305

 8,139

 8,415

 8,395

 7,427

 8,439

 6,994

 7,197

 6,574

 6,713

 7,753

 10,070

 12,459

 11,684

 11,367

 11,055

 8,397

 8,978

 9,758

 8,554

 8,028

 7,900

 7,565

INFLOW

 1,868

 3,456

 3,384

 3,779

 3,120

 3,304

 10,255

 10,900

 11,506

 11,866

 11,282

 9,849

 8,063

 7,694

 7,817

 6,212

 5,066

 4,311

 3,742

 3,119

 3,207

 3,695

 3,336

 4,271

 4,437

 4,945

 5,327

 6,153

 5,655

 5,649

POWER

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

SPILL

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

OUTLET

 191

 239

 104

 96

 184

 144

 120

 152

 200

 240

 120

 175

 239

 120

 64

 88

 144

 24

 176

 0

 80

 81

 243

 243

 243

 219

 301

 203

 155

 244

C.F.S.

 .24

 .30

 .13

 .12

 .23

 .18

 .15

 .19

 .25

 .30

 .15

 .22

 .30

 .15

 .08

 .11

 .18

 .03

 .22

 .00

 .10

 .10

 .30

 .30

 .30

 .27

 .37

 .25

 .19

 .30

INCHES

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .06

 .03

 .00

 .03

 .31

 .83

 1.59

 .05

 .01

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

PRECIP

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

APRIL 2004 SHASTA LAKE DAILY OPERATIONS RUN DATE: May 20, 2004

IN LAKE

EVAPORATION

INCHES

C.F.S.

COMPUTED*

1000 ACRE-FEET

RELEASE - C.F.S.

RIVER

TOTALS +154.4 260,048 177,268 0 0 4,832 6.01 2.91

ACRE-FEET +154,400 515,805 351,611 0 0 9,584

COMMENTS:

* COMPUTED INFLOW IS THE SUM OF CHANGE IN STORAGE, RELEASES AND EVAPORATION.

SUMMARY

RELEASE (ACRE-FEET)

POWER 351,611

SPILL 0

OUTLET

TOTAL

 0

 351,611

PRECIPITATION

THIS MONTH =

TO DATE =

 2.91

JULY 1, 2003 66.48

 3,905.2

Table 3
§ 404.523 Findings by SSA. ( a ) Following the hearing or a review of the record, we will issue written findings which include supporting rationale for the findings. Issuance of these findings concerning whether the overpayment or part of the overpayment is past due and legally enforceable is the final Agency action with respect to the past-due status and enforceability of the overpayment. If we make a determination that a waiver request cannot be granted, we will issue a written notice of this determination in accordance with the regulations in subpart J of this part. Our referral of the overpayment to the Department of the Treasury will not be suspended under § 404.525 pending any further administrative review of the waiver request that the individual may seek.
( b ) Copies of the findings described in paragraph (a) of this section will be distributed to the overpaid individual and the overpaid individual's attorney or other representative, if any.
( c ) If the findings referred to in paragraph (a) of this section affirm that all or part of the overpayment is past due and legally enforceable and, if waiver is requested, we determine that the request cannot be granted, we will refer the overpayment to the Department of the Treasury. No referral will be made to the Department of the Treasury if, based on our review of the overpayment, we reverse our prior finding that the overpayment is past due and legally enforceable or, upon consideration of a waiver request, we determine that waiver of our collection of the overpayment is appropriate.
[56 FR 52469, Oct. 21, 1991, as amended at 62 FR 64278, Dec. 5, 1997]
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JUL-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1999
<CASH>                                               0
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                2,019,148
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                  1,911,324
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             3,948,458
<PP&E>                                      13,109,897
<DEPRECIATION>                               9,527,829
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               7,530,526
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        8,691,369
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       918,635
<OTHER-SE>                                 (2,952,538)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 7,530,526
<SALES>                                      3,009,772
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             3,009,772
<CGS>                                        2,816,496
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                3,239,355
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               195,077
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             192,861
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (424,660)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          (424,660)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (424,660)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (0.09)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.09)


</TABLE>
### §285k. Utilization of United States Special Resources

(a) The letters of credit provided for in section 285l of this title shall be issued to the Bank only to the extent that at the time of issuance the cumulative amount of the United States Special Resources provided to the Bank (A) constitute a minority of all special funds contributions to the Bank, and (B) are no greater than the largest cumulative contribution of any other single country contributing to the special funds of the Bank.

(b) The United States Governor of the Bank shall give due regard to the principles of (A) utilizing all special funds resources on an equitable basis, and (B) significantly shared participation by other contributors in each special fund to which United States Special Resources are provided.

(Pub. L. 89–369, §14, as added Pub. L. 92–245, §1, Mar. 10, 1972, 86 Stat. 58.)
CENTRAL VALLEY OPERATIONS OFFICE

CHINOOK SALMON REPORT

January 2006

Note: Bold numbers are not verified by DFG.

Winter Run Chinook Salmon Estimated Loss (Incidental Take) Spring Run Chinook Salmon Estimated Loss (Incidental Take) 

Daily SWP Daily CVP Daily Combined Season Combined Daily SWP Daily CVP Daily Combined Season Combined Dail

Tagged* No Tag Tagged* No Tag Tagged* No Tag Tagged* No Tag Tagged No Tag Tagged No Tag Tagged No Tag Tagged No Tag In 

DATE Estimated Estimated Estimated Estimated Estimated Estimated Estimated Estimated Estimated Estimated Estimated Estimated Estimated Estimated Estimated Estimated

Loss Loss Loss Loss Loss Loss Loss Loss Loss Loss Loss Loss Loss Loss Loss Loss

1-Jan-06 0 83 0 0 0 83 0 264 0 0 0000 6,074 

2-Jan-06 0000 0 0 0 264 0 0 0000 7,015 

3-Jan-06 0 29 0 0 0 29 0 293 0 0 0000 4,038 

4-Jan-06 0000 0 0 0 293 0 0 0000 5,092 

5-Jan-06 0000 0 0 0 293 0 0 0000 3,158 

6-Jan-06 0000 0 0 0 293 0 0 0 0 0 0 725 

7-Jan-06 0000 0 0 0 293 0 0 0000 3,923 

8-Jan-06 0000 0 0 0 293 0 0 0000 5,481 

9-Jan-06 0000 0 0 0 293 0 0 0000 2,524 

10-Jan-06 0000 0 0 0 293 0 0 0000 3,433 

11-Jan-06 0000 0 0 0 293 0 0 0000 2,801 

12-Jan-06 0000 0 0 0 293 0 0 0000 2,634 

13-Jan-06 0000 0 0 0 293 0 0 0000 2,540 

14-Jan-06 0000 0 0 0 293 0 0 0000 3,440 

15-Jan-06 0000 0 0 0 293 0 0 0000 3,260 

16-Jan-06 0000 0 0 0 293 0 0 0000 2,900 

17-Jan-06 0000 0 0 0 293 0 0 0000 2,446 

18-Jan-06 0 12 0 0 0 12 0 305 0 0 0000 3,205 

19-Jan-06 0000 0 0 0 305 0 0 0000 2,580 

20-Jan-06 0000 0 0 0 305 0 0 0000 3,371 

21-Jan-06 0000 0 0 0 305 0 0 0000 3,607 

22-Jan-06 0000 0 0 0 305 0 0 0000 4,008 

23-Jan-06 0000 0 0 0 305 0 0 0000 3,299 

24-Jan-06 0001 0 1 0 306 0 0 0000 3,069 

25-Jan-06 0009 0 9 0 315 0 0 0000 1,704 

26-Jan-06 0000 0 0 0 315 0 0 0000 1,860 

27-Jan-06 0000 0 0 0 315 0 0 0000 2,474 

28-Jan-06 0000 0 0 0 315 0 0 0000 2,611 

29-Jan-06 0000 0 0 0 315 0 0 0000 2,259 

30-Jan-06 0000 0 0 0 315 0 0 0000 1,784 

31-Jan-06 0000 0 0 0 315 0 0 0000 1,996 

Total 0 124 0 10 0 134 0 315000 00000 99,311 1

Winter Run Incidental Take Levels (Oct 1 thru May 31) Spring Run Incidental Take Levels for Season Combined Total (Oct 1 thru Jun 30)Tagged Yellow Light Level = ??? SeasonTagged Red Light Level = ??? SeasonNo Tag Yellow Light Level = ??? SeasonNo Tag Red Light Level = ??? Season* This number is determined by Winter Run Length only until the tags have been read. All tags from Winter Run Length Fish have been read and numbers are updated thru ????

Banks T
### §3950. Reemployment rights following limited appointment

Any employee of an agency who accepts a limited appointment in the Service with the consent of the head of the agency in which the employee is employed shall be entitled, upon the termination of such limited appointment, to be reemployed in accordance with section 3597 of title 5.

(Pub. L. 96–465, title I, §310, Oct. 17, 1980, 94 Stat. 2087.)

#### **Executive Documents**

#### Entitlement to Benefits for Services Performed Outside United States; Service Exceeding Thirty Months

Persons appointed, employed, or assigned after May 19, 1959, under former section 1787(c) of this title or section 2385(d) of this title for the purpose of performing functions under the Mutual Security Act of 1954 (see Short Title note set out under section 1754 of this title) and the Foreign Assistance Act of 1961 (section 2151 et seq. of this title) outside the United States shall not, unless otherwise agreed by the agency in which such benefits may be exercised, be entitled to the benefits provided for by this section in cases in which their service under the appointment, employment, or assignment exceeds thirty months. See Ex. Ord. No. 12163, §1–602(b), Sept. 29, 1979, 44 F.R. 56677, as amended, set out as a note under section 2381 of this title.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

DAY HIGH

 118

 96

 103

 102

 96

 91

 120

 121

 111

 115

 113

 124

 102

 100

 104

 114

 139

 122

 103

 120

 135

 99

 94

 99

 94

 123

 94

 95

 95

 95

 78

 83

 87

 88

 89

 81

 85

 89

 89

 89

 89

 86

 89

 83

 88

 89

 82

 81

 87

 91

 91

 87

 88

 89

 89

 89

 88

 90

 89

 90

 91

 87

 91

 92

 90

 86

 89

 94

 93

 92

 92

 92

 91

 91

 90

 92

 94

 92

 93

 93

 95

 92

 90

 91

 90

 94

 90

 92

 91

 91

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

NOVEMBER 2008 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: December 5, 2008

HIGH LOW MEAN

 60.9

 61.3

 60.2

 59.0

 57.2

 57.1

 57.4

 56.6

 57.3

 57.3

 56.7

 57.5

 58.1

 58.3

 58.2

 57.9

 58.3

 57.5

 57.1

 57.1

 57.0

 55.3

 54.7

 54.0

 54.2

 55.8

 56.3

 56.2

 55.5

 54.6

 60.2

 59.2

 58.3

 57.0

 52.8

 54.6

 54.5

 54.5

 55.0

 54.3

 54.1

 55.1

 55.3

 55.9

 55.6

 55.4

 55.1

 54.7

 55.0

 54.7

 54.4

 53.1

 52.6

 52.0

 52.6

 54.1

 54.9

 54.9

 54.4

 53.2

 60.4

 60.2

 59.2

 58.1

 56.0

 56.0

 56.0

 55.7

 56.1

 55.8

 55.6

 56.3

 56.8

 57.2

 57.0

 56.8

 56.6

 56.2

 56.1

 56.0

 55.5

 54.4

 53.8

 53.2

 53.5

 54.7

 55.5

 55.4

 54.8

 53.9

HIGH LOW MEAN

 9.2

 9.3

 9.4

 9.5

 10.0

 10.1

 10.1

 9.8

 9.9

 10.1

 10.3

 10.2

 10.1

 10.0

 10.0

 10.0

 10.1

 10.2

 10.2

 10.2

 10.2

 10.4

 10.5

 10.5

 10.5

 10.0

 10.0

 10.1

 10.3

 10.5

 7.9

 8.9

 8.9

 9.1

 8.5

 9.7

 9.7

 8.8

 8.9

 9.6

 9.8

 9.8

 9.4

 9.6

 9.7

 9.6

 9.6

 9.7

 9.8

 9.8

 9.7

 9.9

 10.0

 10.1

 10.1

 9.7

 9.5

 9.6

 9.8

 9.9

 9.0

 9.1

 9.2

 9.3

 9.6

 9.9

 9.9

 9.4

 9.5

 9.8

 10.0

 10.0

 9.9

 9.8

 9.8

 9.8

 9.9

 9.9

 9.9

 9.9

 9.9

 10.1

 10.2

 10.3

 10.2

 9.9

 9.7

 9.8

 10.0

 10.2

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

RIPON ON THE STANISLAUS RIVER

 ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS WATER TEMPERATURE, DEG DISSOLVED OXYZEN, PPM
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

DAY HIGH

 9,744

 10,471

 10,627

 11,276

 11,785

 12,475

 12,810

 12,420

 11,200

 10,296

 9,201

 9,838

 10,294

 10,865

 10,555

 11,369

 11,165

 12,312

 12,069

 13,355

 13,349

 14,205

 12,329

 13,592

 12,513

 12,314

 10,989

 9,724

 7,950

 8,909

 3,827

 4,072

 4,380

 4,040

 3,929

 4,209

 4,358

 4,581

 4,780

 3,834

 3,626

 3,174

 3,715

 4,579

 4,383

 5,076

 4,784

 4,889

 4,537

 4,950

 5,071

 5,247

 5,023

 4,340

 4,531

 4,573

 4,770

 4,228

 3,541

 3,581

 6,472

 6,593

 6,915

 7,001

 7,173

 7,326

 7,731

 8,329

 7,601

 6,973

 6,469

 6,388

 7,261

 7,825

 7,317

 7,708

 7,752

 7,665

 7,898

 8,080

 8,601

 8,672

 8,074

 7,960

 8,084

 8,167

 7,921

 6,968

 5,578

 5,463

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

NOVEMBER 2006 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: December 4, 2006

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

PITTSBURG TOP ON THE SACRAMENTO RIVER
§ 418.1260 What major life-changing event evidence will we not accept? ( a ) We will not accept evidence of death that fails to meet the requirements in §§ 404.720 through 404.721 of this chapter.
( b ) We will not accept evidence of marriage that fails to meet the requirements in §§ 404.725 through 404.727 of this chapter.
( c ) We will not accept evidence that your marriage has ended if the evidence fails to meet the requirements in § 404.728 of this chapter.
( d ) We will not accept documents supporting loss of income from income-producing property, or failure of or loss from a defined benefit pension plan unless the documents are original documents or copies from the original source.
( e ) We will not accept evidence of work reduction or work stoppage that cannot be substantiated.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY HIGH

 13,405

 13,514

 12,126

 13,475

 12,468

 10,033

 10,440

 10,022

 10,902

 11,704

 13,054

 13,042

 13,972

 14,345

 15,005

 14,347

 13,548

 14,403

 15,143

 13,720

 10,394

 10,045

 9,949

 12,268

 11,433

 13,149

 12,844

 12,782

 12,941

 9,409

 7,019

 2,610

 2,631

 2,489

 2,859

 2,870

 2,810

 3,209

 3,194

 3,898

 4,403

 5,035

 5,010

 4,179

 4,554

 4,380

 3,918

 3,655

 4,183

 4,179

 3,775

 4,106

 3,952

 3,513

 3,862

 3,639

 4,231

 3,455

 3,966

 3,682

 2,602

 2,851

 6,500

 6,824

 6,427

 6,918

 6,418

 6,148

 6,282

 6,282

 6,708

 7,339

 8,480

 8,441

 8,286

 8,846

 8,915

 8,436

 8,105

 8,206

 8,212

 7,745

 7,045

 6,658

 6,506

 7,021

 6,500

 7,285

 7,538

 7,369

 7,001

 5,123

 4,637

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

JULY 2008 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: August 1, 2008

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

PITTSBURG BOTTOM ON THE SACRAMENTO RIVER