Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 76 / Wednesday, April 20, 2011 / Notices 22143 

Comments may be forwarded by United 

States Postal Service, to the National 

Register of Historic Places, National 

Park Service, 1849 C St., NW., MS 2280, 

Washington, DC 20240; by all other 

carriers, National Register of Historic 

Places, National Park Service, 1201 Eye 

St., NW., 8th floor, Washington, DC 

20005; or by fax, 202–371–6447. Written 

or faxed comments should be submitted 

by May 5, 2011. Before including your 

address, phone number, e-mail address, 

or other personal identifying 

information in your comment, you 

should be aware that your entire 

comment—including your personal 

identifying information—may be made 

publicly available at any time. While 

you can ask us in your comment to 

withhold your personal identifying 

information from public review, we 

cannot guarantee that we will be able to 

do so. 

J. Paul Loether, 

Chief, National Register of Historic Places/ 

National Historic Landmarks Program. 

ARKANSAS 

Cleburne County 

Old Highway 16 Bridge, Lakefront 

Resort Rd., Edgemont, 11000262 

GEORGIA 

Coweta County 

Vinewood, 1324 Roscoe Rd., Newnan, 

11000263 

Troup County 

Westside Historic District, Roughly 

bounded by W. 10th St., the GA–AL 

state line, W. 15th St. & the 

Chattahoochee R., West Point, 

11000264 

MASSACHUSETTS 

Essex County 

Community House, 284 Bay Rd., 

Hamilton, 11000265 

Saunders, Daniel, School, 243 S. 

Broadway, Lawrence, 11000266 

Franklin County 

Deerfield Valley Agricultural Society 

Fairgrounds, Park St., Charlemont, 

1000267 

NEW YORK 

Albany County 

University Club of Albany, The, 141 

Washington Ave., Albany, 11000268 

Broome County 

Bundy, Harlow E., House, 129 Main St., 

Binghamton, 11000269 

Erie County 

20th Century Club, 595 Delaware Ave., 

Buffalo, 11000270 

Buffalo Seminary, 205 Bidwell Pkwy., 

Buffalo, 11000271 

Engine House # 2 & Hook & Ladder # 9, 

310 Jersey St., Buffalo, 11000272 

University Park Historic District, 

(Suburban Development of Buffalo, 

New York MPS) Portions of 

Larchmont Rd., Niagara Falls Blvd., 

Radcliffe Rd., University Ave., 

Allenhurst Rd., Pellhan Dr., Buffalo, 

11000273 

Greene County 

Oak Hill Cemetery, NY 81, Oak Hill, 

11000274 

Niagara County 

Herchell, Allan, Carousel Factory 

(Boundary Increase), 39 Geneva St., 

North Tonawanda, 11000276 

Sheldon, Hazard H., House, 539 4th St., 

Niagara Falls, 11000275 

Onondaga County 

Ayling, John G., House, (Architecture of 

Ward Wellington Ward in Syracuse 

MPS), 223 DeWitt St., Syracuse, 

11000277 

Sullivan County 

Forestburgh Town Hall, 305 Cty Rd. 48, 

Forestburgh, 11000278 

WASHINGTON 

Ferry County 

Slagle, Jesse W. & Elizabeth, House, 912 

S. Keller St., Republic, 11000279 

King County 

Allen, John B., School, 6532 Phinney 

Ave. N., Seattle, 11000280 

A request for REMOVAL has been 

made for the following resource: 

INDIANA 

Vanderburgh County 

Buckingham Apartments (Downtown 

Evansville MRA) 314–316 SE 3rd St., 

Evansville, 82000082 

[FR Doc. 2011–9503 Filed 4–19–11; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4312–51–P 

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR 

Bureau of Reclamation 

Notice of Intent To Accept Proposals, 

Select One Lessee, and Contract for 

Hydroelectric Power Development at 

the Pueblo Dam River Outlet, a feature 

of the Fryingpan-Arkansas Project 

(Fry-Ark Project), Colorado 

AGENCY: Bureau of Reclamation, 

Interior. 

ACTION: Notice of intent. 

SUMMARY: Promoting responsible 

development of renewable energy and 

moving the Nation toward a clean 

energy future is a top priority of the 

Department of the Interior. The 

Department signed a Memorandum of 

Understanding in March 2010 intended 

to focus on opportunities for 

development of environmentally 

sustainable hydropower at existing 

Bureau of Reclamation (Reclamation) 

facilities. The Department, acting 

through the Reclamation will consider 

proposals for non-Federal development 

of hydroelectric power at Pueblo Dam 

River Outlet of the Fry-Ark Project, 

Colorado. Reclamation is considering 

such hydroelectric power development 

under a lease of power privilege. No 

Federal funds will be available for such 

hydroelectric power development. The 

Department will prioritize projects that 

appropriately balance increased energy 

generation with consideration of 

environmental impacts. The Western 

Area Power Administration (Western) 

would have the first opportunity to 

purchase and/or market the power that 

would be generated by such 

development under a lease of power 

privilege. The Fry-Ark Project is a 

Reclamation project. This Notice 

presents background information, 

proposal content guidelines, 

information concerning selection of one 

or more non-Federal entities to develop 

hydroelectric power at Pueblo Dam 

River Outlet, and power purchasing 

and/or marketing considerations. 

Interested entities are invited to submit 

a proposal on this project. 

DATES: A written proposal and seven 

copies must be submitted on or before 

12 p.m. (MDT), on August 19, 2011. A 

proposal will be considered timely only 

if it is received in the office of the Lease 

of Power Privilege Coordinator by or 

before 12 p.m. (MDT) on the designated 

date. Interested entities are cautioned 

that delayed delivery to this office due 

to failures or misunderstandings of the 

entity and/or of mail, overnight, or 

courier services will not excuse lateness 

and, accordingly, are advised to provide 

sufficient time for delivery. Late 

proposals will not be considered. 

ADDRESSES: Written proposals and 

seven copies should be sent to Mr. 

George Gliko, Lease of Power Privilege 

Coordinator (GP–2200), Bureau of 

Reclamation, Great Plains Regional 

Office (GP–2200), P.O. Box 36900, 

Billings, MT 59107–6900. 

Information related to Western’s 

purchasing and/or marketing the power 

may be obtained at Western Area Power 

Administration, Rocky Mountain 

Region, Attn: Dave Neumayer, Power 

Marketing Manager, 5555 East 


srobinson on DSKHWCL6B1PROD with NOTICES
22144 Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 76 / Wednesday, April 20, 2011 / Notices 

Crossroads Blvd., Loveland, CO 80538, 

Telephone: (970) 461–7322. 

Information related to the operation 

and maintenance of Pueblo Dam and 

Reservoir may be obtained from Mr. 

Karl Thiel at the Bureau of Reclamation, 

Eastern Colorado Area Office, 11056 W 

County Road 18E, Loveland, CO 80537– 

9711, Telephone: (970) 962–4331. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mr. 

George Gliko at (406) 247–7651. 

Reclamation will be available to meet 

with interested entities only upon 

written request to the Lease of Power 

Privilege Coordinator at the above 

address. Reclamation reserves the right 

to schedule a single meeting and/or visit 

to address at once the questions of all 

entities that have submitted questions or 

requested site visits. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The FryArk Project, located in south-central 

Colorado, was authorized for 

construction, including hydroelectric 

power, by Public Law 87–590; 76 stat. 

389. Specifically, the act authorizes the 

Secretary of the Interior to construct, 

operate and maintain the FryingpanArkansas Project, Colorado, in 

substantial accordance with House 

Document 187. House Document 187 

states in several sections (Page 29, 

Section 45; Page 31, Section 49) that a 

project power system will be included 

as project features (including Pueblo 

Powerplant to be located at Pueblo Dam 

and Reservoir) and is authorized to be 

constructed, operated, and maintained. 

Reclamation operates and maintains 

Pueblo Dam and Reservoir. Reclamation 

has recently released its Hydropower 

Resource Assessment (March 2011), 

which estimated that Pueblo Dam is 

economically feasible to develop 

(benefit-cost ratio 2.34, including green 

incentives), and that there is a potential 

capacity of 13 MW. The Assessment 

may be viewed in its entirety at http:// 

www.usbr.gov/power/. 

Reclamation is considering 

hydroelectric power development at 

Pueblo Dam River Outlet through a lease 

of power privilege. A lease of power 

privilege is a congressionally authorized 

alternative to Federal hydroelectric 

power development. A lease of power 

privilege grants to a non-Federal entity 

the right to utilize the Fry-Ark project 

for non-Federal electric power 

generation and sale, consistent with 

project purposes. Leases of power 

privilege have terms not to exceed 40 

years. The general authority for lease of 

power privilege under Reclamation law 

includes, among others, the Town Sites 

and Power Development Act of 1906 (43 

U.S.C. 522) (1906 Act) and the 

Reclamation Project Act of 1939 (43 

U.S.C. 485h(c)) (1939 Act). Reclamation 

will be the lead Federal agency for 

ensuring compliance with the National 

Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) of 

any lease of power privilege considered 

in response to this Notice. Leases of 

power privilege may be issued only 

when Reclamation, upon completion of 

the NEPA process, determines that the 

affected hydroelectric power sites are 

environmentally acceptable. Any lease 

of power privilege at Pueblo Dam River 

Outlet must accommodate existing 

contractual commitments related to 

operation and maintenance of such 

existing facilities, and must meet the 

requirements of applicable law, 

including, but not limited to, the 1906 

Act and the 1939 Act. 

Western would have the first 

opportunity to purchase and/or market 

the power that would be generated 

under any lease of power privilege. 

Under this process, Western would 

either purchase and market the power as 

Loveland Area Power power or market 

the power independently by first 

offering it to preference entities and 

secondly to non-preference entities. 

All costs incurred by the United 

States related to development and 

operation and maintenance under a 

lease of power privilege, including but 

not limited to NEPA compliance, 

development of the lease of power 

privilege, design reviews, construction 

oversight, and any other associated 

documents, would be the expense of the 

lessee. 

Proposal Content Guidelines: 

Interested parties should submit one or 

more proposals explaining in as precise 

detail as is practicable how the 

hydropower potential at each site would 

be developed. Factors which proposals 

should consider and address include, 

but are not limited to, the following: 

1. Provide all information relevant to 

the qualifications of the proposing 

entity to plan and implement such a 

project, including, but not limited to, 

information about preference status, 

type of organization, length of time in 

business, experience in funding, design 

and construction of similar projects, 

industry rating(s) that indicate financial 

soundness and/or technical and 

managerial capability, experience of key 

management personnel, history of any 

reorganizations or mergers with other 

companies, safety record, and any other 

information that demonstrates the 

interested entity’s organizational, 

technical and financial ability to 

perform all aspects of the work. Include 

a discussion of past experience in 

operating and maintaining similar 

facilities and provide references as 

appropriate. The term preference entity, 

as applied to a lease of power privilege, 

means an entity qualifying for 

preference under Section 9(c) of the 

1939 Act, as a municipality, public 

corporation or agency, or cooperative or 

other nonprofit organization financed in 

whole or in part by loans made pursuant 

to the Rural Electrification Act of 1936, 

as amended. 

2. Provide geographical locations and 

describe principal structures and other 

important features of the proposed 

development including roads and 

transmission lines. Estimate and 

describe installed capacity and the 

capacity of the power facilities under 

dry, average, and wet hydrological 

conditions. Also describe seasonal or 

annual generation patterns. Include 

estimates of the amount of electrical 

energy that would be produced from 

each facility for each month of average, 

dry and wet water years. If capacity and 

energy can be delivered to another 

location, either by the proposing entity 

or by potential wheeling agents, specify 

where capacity and energy can be 

delivered. Include concepts for power 

sales and contractual arrangements, 

involved parties and the proposed 

approach to wheeling if required. 

3. Indicate title arrangements and the 

ability to acquire title to or the right to 

occupy and use lands necessary for the 

proposed development, including such 

additional lands as may be required 

during construction. 

4. Identify water rights applicable to 

the operation of the proposed 

development, the holder of such rights, 

and how these rights would be acquired 

or perfected. 

5. Discuss any studies necessary to 

adequately define impacts on the FryArk Project and the environment 

required by the development. Describe 

any significant environmental issues 

associated with the development and 

the proposing entity’s approach for 

gathering relevant data and resolving 

such issues to protect and enhance the 

quality of the environment. Explain any 

proposed use of the hydropower 

development for conservation and 

utilization of the available water 

resources in the public interest. 

6. Describe anticipated contractual 

arrangements with the entity or entities 

having operation and maintenance 

responsibility for the Fry-Ark Project 

feature(s) that are proposed for 

utilization in the hydropower 

development under consideration. 

Define how the hydropower 

development would operate in harmony 

with the Fry-Ark Project, not impact 

Fry-Ark Project operations, existing 

applicable contracts related to operation 

and maintenance of Fry-Ark Project 


srobinson on DSKHWCL6B1PROD with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 76 / Wednesday, April 20, 2011 / Notices 22145 

feature(s) that are proposed for 

utilization in the hydropower 

development under consideration, and 

any other applicable water-related 

contracts. 

7. Identify the organizational structure 

planned for the long-term operation and 

maintenance of any proposed 

hydropower development. 

8. Provide a management plan to 

accomplish such activities as planning, 

NEPA compliance, lease of power 

privilege development, design, 

construction, facility testing, and start of 

hydropower production. Prepare 

schedules of these activities as 

applicable. Describe what studies are 

necessary to accomplish the 

hydroelectric power development and 

how the studies would be implemented. 

9. Estimate development cost. This 

cost should include all investment costs 

such as the cost of studies to determine 

feasibility, NEPA compliance, design, 

construction, associated bonding and 

financing as well as the amortized 

annual cost of the investment; also, the 

annual operation, maintenance, and 

replacement expense for the 

hydropower development; lease 

payments to the United States; and 

expenses that may be associated with 

the Fry-Ark Project. If there are 

additional transmission or wheeling 

expenses associated with the 

development of the hydropower 

development, these should be included. 

Identify proposed methods of financing 

and hydropower development. An 

economic analysis should be presented 

that compares the present worth of all 

benefits and costs of the hydropower 

development. 

Selection of Lessee: Reclamation will 

evaluate proposals received in response 

to this published notice. 

Reclamation will give more favorable 

consideration to proposals that (1) Are 

well-adapted to developing, conserving, 

and utilizing the water and natural 

resources, (2) clearly demonstrate that 

the offeror is qualified to develop the 

hydropower facility and provide for 

long-term operation and maintenance, 

and (3) develop the hydropower 

potential economically. Credit will be 

given to those proposals that 

demonstrate development of power in 

an environmentally-friendly manner. 

While all developments will be required 

to perform NEPA analysis, proposals 

should include information as to how 

the proposer will minimize 

environmental impact during 

construction, maintenance and 

operation. Proposers should also 

include design characteristics and 

methods that will be used to minimize 

environmental impacts and improve the 

environmental attributes of the facility. 

Any work the developer is proposing to 

do to enhance the ecosystem should 

also be explained in the proposal. A 

proposal will be deemed unacceptable if 

it is inconsistent with Fry-Ark Project 

purposes, as determined by 

Reclamation. Reclamation will give 

preference to those entities that qualify 

as preference entities (as defined under 

Proposal Content Guidelines, item 1.) 

provided that their proposal is at least 

as well-adapted to developing, 

conserving, and utilizing the water and 

natural resources as other submitted 

proposals and that the preference entity 

is well qualified. Preference entities 

would be allowed 90 days to improve 

their proposals, if necessary, to be made 

at least equal to a proposal that may 

have been submitted by a nonpreference entity. 

Power Purchasing and/or Marketing 

Considerations: Western would have the 

first opportunity to purchase and/or 

market the power that would be 

generated by the project under a lease of 

power privilege. Western will consult 

with Reclamation on such power 

purchasing and/or marketing 

considerations. 

In the event Western elects to not 

purchase and/or market the power 

generated by the hydropower 

development or such a decision cannot 

be made prior to execution of the lease 

of power privilege, the lessee would be 

responsible for marketing the power 

generated by the project with priority 

given to preference entities as heretofore 

defined in Proposal Content Guidelines, 

item 1. 

Notice and Time Period to Enter Into 

Lease of Power Privilege: Reclamation 

will notify, in writing, all entities 

submitting proposals of Reclamation’s 

decision regarding selection of the 

potential lessee. The selected potential 

lessee will have 2 years from the date 

of such notification to enter into a lease 

of power privilege for the site or sites 

identified in the proposal. This period 

may only be extended by the United 

States in writing. Such leases of power 

privilege will state whether and how 

Western will be involved in purchasing 

and/or marketing the power. 

Dated: April 14, 2011. 

Michael J. Ryan, 

Regional Director. 

[FR Doc. 2011–9533 Filed 4–19–11; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4310–MN–P 

INTERNATIONAL TRADE 

COMMISSION 

Inv. No. 337–TA–756 

In the Matter of Certain Reduced 

Ignition Proclivity Cigarette Paper 

Wrappers and Products Containing 

Same; Notice of Commission 

Determination Not To Review an Initial 

Determination Granting Complainant’s 

Motion To Amend the Complaint and 

Notice of the Investigation 

AGENCY: U.S. International Trade 

Commission. 

ACTION: Notice. 

SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given that 

the U.S. International Trade 

Commission has determined not to 

review an initial determination (‘‘ID’’) 

(Order No. 5) of the presiding 

administrative law judge (‘‘ALJ’’) 

granting complainant’s motion to amend 

the complaint and notice of the 

investigation to add seven respondents 

to the investigation. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Michael Haldenstein, Office of the 

General Counsel, U.S. International 

Trade Commission, 500 E Street, SW., 

Washington, DC 20436, telephone 202– 

205–3041. Copies of the ID and all other 

nonconfidential documents filed in 

connection with this investigation are or 

will be available for inspection during 

official business hours (8:45 a.m. to 5:15 

p.m.) in the Office of the Secretary, U.S. 

International Trade Commission, 500 E 

Street, SW., Washington, DC 20436, 

telephone 202–205–2000. Hearingimpaired persons are advised that 

information on this matter can be 

obtained by contacting the 

Commission’s TDD terminal on 202– 

205–1810. General information 

concerning the Commission may also be 

obtained by accessing its Internet server 

(http://www.usitc.gov). The public 

record for this investigation may be 

viewed on the Commission’s electronic 

docket (EDIS) at http://edis.usitc.gov. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: On 

January 13, 2011, the Commission 

instituted an investigation under section 

337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, 19 U.S.C. 

1337, based on a complaint filed by 

Schweitzer-Mauduit International, Inc., 

of Alpharetta, Georgia (‘‘Schweitzer’’), 

alleging a violation of section 337 in the 

importation, sale for importation, and 

sale within the United States after 

importation of certain reduced ignition 

proclivity cigarette paper wrappers and 

products containing same by reason of 

infringement of certain claims of U.S. 

Patent No. 6,725,867 and U.S. Patent 

No. 5,878,753. Complainant Schweitzer 


srobinson on DSKHWCL6B1PROD with NOTICES