alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 404.770 Evidence of where the insured person had a permanent home. ( a ) *When evidence of the insured's permanent home is needed.* We may ask for evidence of where the insured person's permanent home was at the time you applied or, if earlier, the time he or she died if— ( 1 ) You apply for benefits as the insured's wife, husband, widow, widower, parent or child; and
( 2 ) Your relationship to the insured depends upon the State law that would be followed in the place where the insured had his or her permanent home when you applied for benefits or when he or she died.
( b ) *What evidence is needed.* We will ask for the following evidence of the insured person's permanent home: ( 1 ) Your signed statement showing where the insured considered his permanent home to be.
( 2 ) If the statement in paragraph (b)(1) of this section or other evidence we have raises a reasonable doubt about where the insured's permanent home was, evidence of where he or she paid personal, property, or income taxes, or voted; or other convincing evidence of where his or her permanent home was.
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.1

                    CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
            PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

      Solely for the purpose of complying with 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, I, the undersigned
Chief Executive Officer of Alliance Pharmaceutical Corp. (the "Company"), hereby
certify, based on my knowledge, that the Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of the
Company for the three months ended September 30, 2007 (the "Report") fully
complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities and
Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in the Report fairly
presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
operations of the Company.

Date: November 14, 2007



BY:   /s/ Duane J. Roth
      -----------------
      Duane J. Roth
      Chief Executive Officer
STATE OF LOUISIANA

COURT OF APPEAL, FIRST CIRCUIT

STATE OF LOUISIANA

VERSUS

OPTUMRX, INC. AND UNITED

HEALTHCARE OF LOUISIANA, 

INC. D/B/A UNITED HEALTHCARE

COMMUNITY PLAN

NO. 2023 CW 0926

NOVEMBER 6, 2023

In Re: OptumRx, Inc. and United Healthcare of Louisiana, Inc. 

d/b/a United Healthcare Community Plan, applying for

supervisory writs, 19th Judicial District Court, 

Parish of East Baton Rouge, No. 717848. 

BEFORE: THERIOT, PENZATO, AND GREENE, JJ. 

WRIT GRANTED WITH ORDER. The district court's August 22, 

202 3 order which denied the motion for suspensive appeal filed

by defendants, OptumRx, Inc. and United Heathcare of Louisiana, 

Inc., is reversed. On August 3, 2023, the district court

granted a motion for sanctions against defendants and ordered

that defendants shall pay the reasonable expenses, including

attorney fees, with the award to be made following further

evidentiary submissions relative to the time and expenses

incurred. La. Code Civ. P. art. 2088 (A) ( 10) provides that the

trial court retains jurisdiction for purposes of setting " costs, 

expert witness fees, and attorney fees" after an appeal has been

taken from the initial judgment. This judgment constitutes a

partial final judgment subject to appeal under La. Code Civ. P. 

art. 1915(A) (6). See Capital City Press, LLC v. Louisiana State

University System Board of Supervisors, 2013-1994 ( La. 8/28/13), 

120 So. 3d 250. Accordingly, defendants' motion for suspensive

appeal is granted, and this matter is remanded to the district

court with instructions to fix the security for a suspensive

appeal pursuant to the provision of La. Code Civ. P. art. 

2124(B). 

COURT OF APPEAL, FIRST CIRCUIT

DEPUTY CLERK OF COURT

FOR THE COURT

MRT

AHP

HG
(No. 73—CC—136

#### South Side Control Supply Company, Claimant, *vs.*State of Illinois, Department of Mental Health, Respondent.

*Opinion filed April 16, 1973.*

South Side Control Supply Company, Claimant, pro se.

William J. Scott, Attorney General; Saul R. Wexler, Assistant Attorney General, for Respondent.

Per Curiam.
I 

★

114TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 4156 

To ensure equal access for HUBZone designations to all tax-paying small 

business owners. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

DECEMBER 2, 2015 

Mr. CA ́RDENAS (for himself, Mr. ELLISON, Mr. VARGAS, Ms. CLARKE of New 

York, Ms. MENG, Mr. POCAN, Mr. TAKANO, Mr. POLIS, Mrs. TORRES, 

Mr. CARSON of Indiana, and Mr. LOWENTHAL) introduced the following 

bill; which was referred to the Committee on Small Business 

A BILL 

To ensure equal access for HUBZone designations to all 

tax-paying small business owners. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘HUBZone Equity 

5 Act’’. 

6 SEC. 2. AMENDMENT TO DEFINITION OF HUBZONE SMALL 

7 BUSINESS CONCERN. 

8 Subparagraph (A) of section 3(p)(3) of the Small 

9 Business Act (15 U.S.C. 632(p)(3)) is amended by insertVerDate Sep 11 2014 00:21 Dec 10, 2015 Jkt 059200 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 6652 Sfmt 6201 E:\BILLS\H4156.IH H4156

SSpencer on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

HR 4156 IH1S 

1 ing ‘‘or lawful permanent residents of the United States’’ 

2 after ‘‘United States citizens’’. 

Æ 


SSpencer on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
1919
                Pennsylvania Avenue, NWWashington,
                DC 20006-3434202-331-1112202-659-2053
                Fax







March
      10,
      2006




Throughout
      its term as Special Servicer which was for the period of January 1, 2005 through
      July 13, 2005, Allied Capital Corporation, in its capacity as Special Servicer
      has complied in all material respects with the applicable minimum servicing
      standards set forth in the Mortgage Bankers Association of America's Uniform
      Single Attestation Program for Mortgage Bankers.  The applicable
      minimum standards are Items VI and VII .






/s/
      John M. Scheurer


John
      M.
      Scheurer


Managing
      Director


Allied
      Capital Corporation
Exhibit 32.2 

**Certification Pursuantto 18 U.S.C. 1350, As Adopted Pursuant toSection 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**

        Inconnection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended August 31, 2003 (the“Report”) of Immucor, Inc. (the “Registrant”), as filed with theSecurities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, I certify, to the best of myknowledge, that: 

    (1)                 The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the          Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and 

    (2)                 The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material          respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant. 

January 14, 2004 

/s/Steven C. Ramsey

StevenC. Ramsey
### §262p–16. United States policy on World Bank Group and Asian Development Bank Assistance to the People's Republic of China

#### (a) In general

The Secretary of the Treasury shall instruct the United States Executive Director at each international financial institution of the World Bank Group and at the Asian Development Bank to use the voice and vote of the United States at the respective institution to vote against the provision of any loan, extension of financial assistance, or technical assistance to the People's Republic of China unless the Secretary of the Treasury has certified to the appropriate congressional committees that—

(1) the Government of the People's Republic of China and any lender owned or controlled by the Government of the People's Republic of China have demonstrated a commitment—

(A) to the rules and principles of the Paris Club, or of other similar coordinated multilateral initiatives on debt relief and debt restructuring in which the United States participates, including with respect to debt transparency and appropriate burden-sharing among all creditors;

(B) to the practice of presumptive public disclosure of the terms and conditions on which they extend credit to other governments (without regard to the form of any such extension of credit);

(C) not to enforce any agreement terms that may impair their own or the borrowers' capacity fully to implement any commitment described in subparagraph (A) or (B); and

(D) not to enter into any agreement containing terms that may impair their own or the borrowers' capacity fully to implement any commitment described in subparagraph (A) or (B); or

(2) the loan or assistance is important to the national interest of the United States, as described in a detailed explanation by the Secretary to accompany the certification.

#### (b) Definitions

In this section:

#### (1) Appropriate congressional committees

The term "appropriate congressional committees" means the Committee on Financial Services of the House of Representatives and the Committee on Foreign Relations of the Senate.

#### (2) World Bank Group

The term "World Bank Group" means the International Bank for Reconstruction and Development, the International Development Association, the International Finance Corporation, and the Multilateral Investment Guarantee Agency.

(Pub. L. 95–118, title XVI, §1632, as added Pub. L. 117–263, div. E, title LVII, §5701, Dec. 23, 2022, 136 Stat. 3407.)

#### Repeal of Section

Pub. L. 117–263, div. E, title LVII, §5701(b), Dec. 23, 2022, 136 Stat. 3408, provided that, effective on the date that is 7 years after Dec. 23, 2022, this section is repealed.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date of Repeal

Pub. L. 117–263, div. E, title LVII, §5701(b), Dec. 23, 2022, 136 Stat. 3408, provided that: "The amendment made by subsection (a) [enacting this section] is repealed effective on the date that is 7 years after the effective date of this section [Dec. 23, 2022]."

#### Definitions

The definitions in section 262p–5 of this title apply to this section.
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Raymond R. Woodley, Appellant.

It appearing that the Justices qualified to sit in this appeal are equally divided and unable to render a decision therein, the said appeal is transferred to the Appellate Division, Third Department, to be there heard and determined pursuant to section 618 of the Civil Practice Act. Present — Harris, MeCurn, Larkin and Love, JJ.
§ 404.1350 Deemed insured status. ( a ) *When deemed insured status applies.* If you are the survivor of a World War II veteran, we consider the veteran to have died fully insured as discussed in § 404.111 and we include wage credits in determining your monthly benefit or lump-sum death payment if— ( 1 ) The veteran was separated from active service of the United States before July 27, 1951; and
( 2 ) The veteran died within 3 years after separation from active service and before July 27, 1954.
( b ) *Amount of credit given for deemed insured World War II veterans.* ( 1 ) When we compute a survivor's benefit or lump-sum death payment, we give credit for— ( i ) $200 (for increment year purposes) for each calendar year in which the veteran had at least 30 days of active service beginning September 16, 1940, through 1950; and
( ii ) An average monthly wage of $160.
( 2 ) If the World War II veteran was fully or currently insured without the wage credits, we add increment years (years after 1936 and prior to 1951 in which the veteran had at least $200 in creditable earnings) to the increment years based on the veteran's wages.
#### Anna E. Provost, Appellant, v. Daniel E. Provost, Respondent.

No opinion. Settle order on notice. Present — Martin, P. J., Townley, Untermyer, Cohn and Callahan, JJ.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY HIGH

 4,440

 5,273

 4,448

 6,213

 6,530

 6,496

 7,057

 7,221

 8,237

 9,554

 8,512

 9,210

 9,108

 6,966

 7,046

 6,758

 6,655

 6,550

 7,235

 8,149

 8,133

 9,313

 10,044

 10,666

 9,336

 10,175

 10,663

 11,615

 11,944

 9,702

 10,741

 834

 866

 846

 949

 1,210

 1,387

 1,625

 1,559

 1,673

 1,944

 1,989

 2,018

 2,485

 2,233

 1,977

 2,018

 1,920

 1,806

 2,274

 2,663

 2,769

 2,953

 3,128

 3,300

 3,406

 2,686

 2,797

 3,121

 3,797

 4,031

 4,017

 2,343

 2,169

 2,325

 2,634

 2,972

 3,297

 3,384

 3,474

 4,162

 4,737

 4,595

 4,793

 5,206

 4,694

 4,290

 4,094

 3,889

 3,749

 4,044

 4,527

 5,172

 5,583

 5,906

 6,343

 5,960

 5,790

 6,181

 6,695

 7,504

 7,289

 6,826

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

OCTOBER 2006 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: November 3, 2006

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

PITTSBURG TOP ON THE SACRAMENTO RIVER
#### Maud E. Norden, Respondent, v. Mortimer Norden, Appellant.

Order modified by reducing counsel fee to $250 and as modified affirmed, without costs. No opinion. Present—Ingraham, P. J., Clarke, Scott, Dowling and Hotchkiss, JJ.
WARNING: THE EDGAR SYSTEM ENCOUNTERED ERROR(S) WHILE PROCESSING THIS SCHEDULE.

<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS AND THE CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS AND IS
QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<CIK> 0001022657
<NAME> AETNA INDUSTRIES
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-QUARTER-END>                       APR-02-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               APR-02-1999
<CASH>                                              28
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   34,464
<ALLOWANCES>                                       424
<INVENTORY>                                      7,981
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                85,729
<PP&E>                                         121,395
<DEPRECIATION>                                  50,652
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 185,837
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          104,858
<BONDS>                                         88,125
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                    (12,644)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   185,837
<SALES>                                         66,820
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                66,820
<CGS>                                           58,703
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   58,703
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 4,972
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               3,815
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  (670)
<INCOME-TAX>                                     (126)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              (544)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     (544)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
§ 403.130 What factors may the Commissioner consider in determining whether SSA will grant your application for testimony? In deciding whether to authorize the testimony of an SSA employee, the Commissioner will consider applicable law and factors relating to your need and the burden to SSA. The considerations include, but are not limited to, the following: ( a ) *Risk of law violation or compromise of Government privilege.* ( 1 ) Would providing the testimony violate a statute (such as 26 U.S.C. 6103 or section 1106 of the Social Security Act, 42 U.S.C. 1306), Executive Order, or regulation (such as 20 CFR part 401)?
( 2 ) Would providing the testimony put confidential, sensitive, or privileged information at risk?
( b ) *Burden on SSA.* ( 1 ) Would granting the application unduly expend for private purposes the resources of the United States (including the time of SSA employees needed for official duties)?
( 2 ) Would the testimony be available in a less burdensome form or from another source?
( 3 ) Would the testimony be limited to the purpose of the request?
( 4 ) Did you previously request the same testimony in the same or a related proceeding?
( c ) *Interests served by allowing testimony.* ( 1 ) Would providing the testimony serve SSA's interest?
( 2 ) Would providing the testimony maintain SSA's policy of impartiality among private litigants?
( 3 ) Is another government agency involved in the proceeding?
( 4 ) Do you need the testimony to prevent fraud or similar misconduct?
( 5 ) Would providing the testimony be necessary to prevent a miscarriage of justice or to preserve the rights of an accused individual to due process in a criminal proceeding?
## Alcona County Board of Commissioners

June 7, 2012
Mr. Dennis DeVanyAlconaCountyBuilding P.O. Box 308 Harrisville, MI48740

Chief, Essential Air Service Division Office of Aviation Analysis Department of Transportation 1200 NewJerseyAvenue SE, Washington, D.C. 20590 Voice: (989) 724-9410 Facsimile: (989) 724-9419

c:,;;:J

l 

### co

Reference; DOT-OST-2009-0300, Alpena, Michigan Air Service Dear Mr. DeVany, The Alcona County Board of Commissioners wishes to lend its supportto the proposal of SkyWestAirlines to provide essential air service at Alpena, Michigan as replacement for our current air service. Local air service that provides an effective connection to the national and international airtransportation system is critical to the economicwell being of Alpena, Michigan and to the surrounding counties aswell. Residents in Alcona County rely on local air service for both business and leisure travel. The SkyWest proposal offers us a 50-seat regionaljetwith the Delta brand and code and service to the Delta hubs of Detroit and Minneapolis. We believe the SkyWest airservice proposal represents the best option for retaining our local air service long term and building uptraffic so that government subsidies can eventually be reduced or eliminated. We urgethe Department of Transportation to award SkyWest Airways the designation to provide Alpena's Essential Air Service. Best regards, 

### lsi Kevin 

### K. Boyat, Sr. Chairman Alcona County Board of Commissioners

"AlconaCounty is an equal opportunityproviderand employer"
(No. 6949

#### Robert F. Scott, Claimant, *vs.*State of Illinois, Department of Transportation, Respondent.

*Opinion filed December 26, 1972.*

Robert F. Scott, Claimant, pro se.

William J. Scott, Attorney General; William E. Webber, Assistant Attorney General, for Respondent.

Per Curiam.
### §3352. Establishment

Subject to section 2321h of this title, the President may establish a regional contingency stockpile for Taiwan that consists of munitions and other appropriate defense articles.

(Pub. L. 117–263, div. E, title LV, §5503(b), Dec. 23, 2022, 136 Stat. 3298.)
Exhibit 99.1

                        ANNUAL STATEMENT AS TO COMPLIANCE

                Carrington Mortgage Loan Trust, Series 2005-NC2
                     Asset Backed Pass-Through Certificates

      I, Richard Cimino, hereby certify that I am a duly appointed President of
New Century Mortgage Corporation (the "Servicer"), and further certify as
follows:

      1. This certification is being made pursuant to the terms of the Pooling
and Servicing Agreement, dated as of May 1, 2005 (the "Agreement"), among Bear
Stearns Asset Backed Securities I LLC as depositor (the "Depositor"), the
Servicer and Deutsche Bank National Trust Company as trustee (the "Trustee").

      2. I have reviewed the activities of the Servicer during the preceding
year and the Servicer's performance under the Agreement and to the best of my
knowledge, based on such review, the Servicer has fulfilled all of its
obligations under the Agreement throughout the year.

      Capitalized terms not otherwise defined herein have the meanings set forth
in the Agreement.


Dated: March 2, 2006
<PAGE>

            IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has executed this Certificate as
of March 2, 2006.

                                                 By: /s/Richard Cimino
                                                    ----------------------------
                                                    Name:  Richard Cimino
                                                    Title: President

            I, Joseph Tortorelli, an Assistant Secretary of the Company, hereby
certify that Richard Cimino is a duly elected, qualified, and acting President
of the Company and that the signature appearing above is his genuine signature.

            IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has executed this Certificate as
of March 2, 2006.

                                                 By: /s/ Joseph Tortorelli
                                                    ----------------------------
                                                    Name:  Joseph Tortorelli
                                                    Title: Assistant Secretary
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

DAY HIGH

 1,671

 1,481

 1,278

 1,318

 1,124

 1,348

 1,410

 1,329

 591

 289

 277

 273

 259

 245

 245

 240

 244

 239

 252

 259

 262

 270

 292

 288

 288

 290

 285

 296

 256

 252

 253

 257

 259

 260

 256

 256

 257

 261

 251

 231

 225

 218

 216

 218

 224

 221

 221

 226

 240

 243

 246

 237

 244

 228

 247

 253

 547

 514

 514

 436

 395

 411

 429

 403

 299

 268

 265

 251

 237

 227

 225

 228

 232

 228

 232

 243

 252

 255

 257

 254

 257

 255

 262

 261

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

FEBRUARY 2014 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: June 6, 2014

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

RIO VISTA ON THE SACRAMENTO RIVER