alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### National Institutes of Health

Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as amended (5 U.S.C. App.), notice is hereby given of the following meeting.

The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

*Name of Committee:*                         National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism Special Emphasis Panel.                    

*Date:*                         May 25-26, 2011.                    

*Time:*                         8 a.m. to 7 p.m.                    

*Agenda:*                         To review and evaluate grant applications.                    

*Place:*                         Legacy Hotel and Meeting Center, 1775 Rockville Pike, Rockville, MD 20852.                    

*Contact Person:*                         Ranga Srinivas, PhD, Chief, Extramural Project Review Branch, EPRB, NIAAA, National Institutes of Health, 5365 Fishers Lane, Room 2085, Rockville, MD 20852, (301) 451-2067,                         *srinivar@mail.nih.gov.*

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.271, Alcohol Research Career Development Awards for Scientists and Clinicians; 93.272, Alcohol National Research Service Awards for Research Training; 93.273, Alcohol Research Programs; 93.891, Alcohol Research Center Grants; 93.701, ARRA Related Biomedical Research and Research Support Awards., National Institutes of Health, HHS)

Dated: April 14, 2011.

Jennifer S. Spaeth,

Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.

[FR Doc. 2011-9815 Filed 4-21-11; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4140-01-P
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
 WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549
 
 FORM 8-K
 
 CURRENT REPORT
 PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE
SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
 Date of report (Date of earliest event reported): July 21, 2011
 EXPRESS SCRIPTS, INC.
 (Exact Name of Registrant as Specified in its Charter)
 
 DELAWARE
(State or Other Jurisdiction of 
Incorporation or Organization
    
    0-20199
(Commission File Number)
    
    43-1420563
(I.R.S. Employer
Identification No.)
 One Express Way, St. Louis, MO
(Address of Principal Executive Offices)
    
    63121
(Zip Code)
  
 
 see
 o Written communications pursuant to Rule 425 under the Securities Act (17 CFR 230.425)o Soliciting material pursuant to Rule 14a-12 under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.14a-12)o Pre-commencement communications pursuant to Rule 14d-2(b) under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.14d-2(b))o Pre-commencement communications pursuant to Rule 13e-4(c) under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.13e-4(c))




---



##### 



Item 2.02 Results of Operations and Financial Condition and Item 7.01 Regulation FD Disclosure.
   Item 9.01 Financial Statements and Exhibits




---



##### 



SIGNATURE
  EXPRESS SCRIPTS, INC.Date:  July 21, 2011
    By:
    /s/ Jeffrey HallJeffrey HallExecutive Vice President 
and Chief Financial Officer
#### § 418.2150 When will we use your amended tax return filed with the IRS?

We will follow the rules in § 418.1150, except that any references in that section to regulations in subpart B of this part shall be treated as references to the corresponding regulation in this subpart.
**EXHIBIT32.1**

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO RULE 13a-14(b) OF THEEXCHANGE ACT AND 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ENACTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OFTHE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of IntrusionInc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-QSB for the three month period ending June 30,2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof(the “Report”), I, G. Ward Paxton, Chief Executive Officer of the Companycertify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as enacted pursuant to Section 906of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:
| (1)    |   | The Report fully complies with the requirements of  section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                                 |
|--------|--------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   |   |                                                                                                                                                   |
| (2)    |   | The information contained in the Report fairly  presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of  operations of the Company. |

 
| August 10, 2007 | /s/ G. Ward Paxton      |   |
|-----------------|-------------------------|--------|
|            | G. Ward Paxton          |   |
|            | Chief Executive Officer |   |

 

1

----
Exhibit 10.38
 ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES, CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT, OPERATIONS
AND MAINTENANCE SUBCONTRACT
 Subcontract Company Subcontractor
 RECITALS
 WHEREAS Clearfield Administrative Services and Construction Management Agreement Facility
 WHEREAS Operations and Maintenance
Agreement
 WHEREAS
 NOW THEREFORE
 Obligations of the Subcontractor
 Term of the Subcontract
 Price




---



##### 



Submission of Invoices to the Company
 Termination
 Inspections and Evaluations
 Books and Records
 Stop Work Order




---



##### 



Indemnity
 Governing Law
 Inventions and Discoveries of the Subcontractor
  Confidentiality




---



##### 



Conflicts of Interest
 [Signature Page Follows]




---



##### 



BIOENERGY MANAGEMENT SERVICES, LLCBy:
Name:
    
    /s/ Stephen J. Gatto

Stephen J. GattoTitle:
    
    PresidentMYRIANT TECHNOLOGIES LLCBy:
Name:
    
    /s/ Chris Tewell

Chris TewellTitle:
    
    Executive Vice President




---



##### 



STATEMENT OF WORK
§ 369.4 Inappropriate use of the seal. The Railroad Retirement Board shall not grant permission for use of the seal in those instances where use of the seal will give the unintended appearance of Agency endorsement or authentication. Situations where use of the seal of the Railroad Retirement Board would be inappropriate include, but are not limited to, the following examples: ( a ) A consulting firm makes arrangements with a railroad to conduct a retirement planning seminar for its employees. Included in the material distributed to the seminar attendees is a booklet, prepared by the consulting firm, which displays the seal of the Railroad Retirement Board on the cover and contains information regarding benefits payable under the Railroad Retirement Act.
( b ) A former employee of the Railroad Retirement Board owns a coffee and donut shop, frequented by present and past railroad workers. Many of the shop's customers know of the owner's prior employment with the Board and frequently ask him questions related to benefits payable under the Railroad Unemployment Insurance and Railroad Retirement Acts. The shop owner prepares and distributes to his customers a monthly flyer listing benefit questions presented to him during the month, as well as his answers to the questions. The flyer displays the seal of the Board.
( c ) A retired railroad employee works part-time in a train hobby shop. The shop owner, at the former railroad worker's suggestion, develops and sells items such as coffee mugs and computer mouse pads with text relevant to benefits paid by the Railroad Retirement Board. The text is taken from publications issued by the Railroad Retirement Board. The merchandise also bears the seal of the Railroad Retirement Board.
CENTRAL VALLEY OPERATIONS OFFICE

CHINOOK SALMON REPORT

November 2009

Note:Bold numbers are not verified by DFG & DWR Preliminary Data - Subject to Change

Winter Run Chinook Salmon Estimated Loss (Incidental Take) Spring Run Chinook Salmon Estimated Loss (Incidental Take) 

Daily SWP Daily CVP Daily Combined Season Combined Daily SWP Daily CVP Daily Combined Season Combined Dail

Tagged* No Tag Tagged* No Tag Tagged* No Tag Tagged* No Tag Tagged No Tag Tagged No Tag Tagged No Tag Tagged No Tag In 

DATE Estimated Estimated Estimated Estimated Estimated Estimated Estimated Estimated Estimated Estimated Estimated Estimated Estimated Estimated Estimated Estimated

Loss Loss Loss Loss Loss Loss Loss Loss Loss Loss Loss Loss Loss Loss Loss Loss

1-Nov-09 0000 0000 0000 0000 3,354 

2-Nov-09 0000 0000 0000 0 0 0 0 905 

3-Nov-09 0000 0000 0000 0 0 0 0 868 

4-Nov-09 0000 0000 0000 0 0 0 0 879 

5-Nov-09 0000 0000 0000 0 0 0 0 844 

6-Nov-09 0000 0000 0000 0 0 0 00 

7-Nov-09 0000 0000 0000 0 0 0 0 885 

8-Nov-09 0000 0000 0000 0 0 0 0 875 

9-Nov-09 0000 0000 0000 0 0 0 0 882 

10-Nov-09 0000 0000 0000 0 0 0 0 880 

11-Nov-09 0000 0000 0000 0 0 0 0 880 

12-Nov-09 0000 0000 0000 0 0 0 0 882 

13-Nov-09 0000 0000 0000 0000 1,072 

14-Nov-09 0000 0000 0000 0000 1,081 

15-Nov-09 0000 0000 0000 0000 1,004 16-Nov-09 0000 0000 0000 0000 1,210 17-Nov-09 0000 0000 0000 0000 1,083 18-Nov-09 0000 0000 0000 0000 1,081 19-Nov-09 0000 0000 0000 0000 1,083 20-Nov-09 0000 0000 0000 0000 1,078 21-Nov-09 0000 0000 0000 0000 1,083 22-Nov-09 0000 0000 0000 0000 1,079 23-Nov-09 0000 0000 0000 0000 1,043 24-Nov-09 0000 0000 0000 0000 1,913 25-Nov-09 0000 0000 0000 0000 3,405 26-Nov-09 0000 0000 0000 0000 3,386 

27-Nov-09 0000 0000 0000 0000 2,920 28-Nov-09 0000 0000 0000 0000 2,883 29-Nov-09 0000 0000 0000 0000 3,492 30-Nov-09 0000 0000 0000 0000 3,138 

Total 0000 0 0 0 0000 00000 45,172 

Winter Run Incidental Take Levels (Oct 1 thru May 31) Spring Run Incidental Take Levels for Season Combined Total (Oct 1 thru Jun 30)

Banks T
Editorial Note on Part 416
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 416 appear at 68 FR 53509, Sept. 11, 2003.

§ 416.1168 How we deem income to you from your essential person. ( a ) *Essential person's income.* If you have an essential person, we deem all of that person's income (except any not counted because of other Federal statutes as described in § 416.1161(b)) to be your own unearned income. If your essential person is also your ineligible spouse, or if you are a child whose essential person is your ineligible parent, we apply the essential person deeming rules in this section. See § 416.1169 for the rules that apply when an ineligible spouse or parent ceases to be your essential person.
( b ) *Determining your eligibility for an SSI benefit.* We apply the exclusions to which you are entitled under §§ 416.1112 and 416.1124 to your earned income and to your unearned income which includes any income deemed from your essential person. After combining the remaining amounts of countable income, we compare the total with the Federal benefit rate for a qualified individual (see § 416.413) to determine whether you are eligible for an SSI benefit.
( c ) *Determining your SSI benefit amount.* We determine your SSI benefit amount in the same way that we determine your eligibility. However, in following the procedure in paragraphs (a) and (b) of this section we use your essential person's income that we deemed to you in the second month prior to the current month. *Exception:* Beginning with the month in which you no longer have your essential person, we do not use any of the income deemed to you from that essential person in a prior month to determine the amount of your benefit (see § 416.1160(a)(3)(ii)(C)). We use only your own countable income in a prior month.
[45 FR 65547, Oct. 3, 1980, as amended at 50 FR 48579, Nov. 26, 1985]
<PAGE>   1


                                 UNITED STATES
                       SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
                             WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549



   
    

                                   FORM 8-K/A

                                (AMENDMENT NO.1)

                                 CURRENT REPORT

                     PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE

                         SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934




   
        Date of Report (Date of earliest event reported): April 19, 1999
    


                 LAKEHEAD PIPE LINE COMPANY, LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
             (Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)



            DELAWARE                     333-59597                39-1715851
  (State or other jurisdiction     (Commission File No.)       (I.R.S. Employer
        of incorporation)                                    Identification No.)



       LAKE SUPERIOR PLACE, 21 WEST SUPERIOR STREET, DULUTH, MN 55802-2067
               (Address of principal executive offices) (Zip Code)


       Registrant's telephone number, including area code: (218) 725-0100



<PAGE>   2

   
    
ITEM 5.    OTHER EVENTS

      This amendment is being filed for the sole purpose of including the
conformed signature that was inadvertently omitted from the EDGAR submission of
the original filing dated April 15, 1999.

   
    
                                    SIGNATURE


      Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the
registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the
undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.


                           LAKEHEAD PIPE LINE COMPANY, LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
                                                (registrant)

                                     By:  Lakehead Pipe Line Company, Inc.
                                             as General Partner

   
    
                                          /s/ M.A. Maki
                                          --------------------------------------
                                          M. A. Maki
                                          Chief Accountant
                                          (Principal Financial and Accounting 
                                          Officer)


Date: April 19, 1999
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5, the Court has determined that this opinion should not be

published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit



## FILED

July 13, 2004

Charles R. Fulbruge III

Clerk UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 03-40004

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

versus

EULOGIO DOMINGUEZ-GONZALES,

Defendant - Appellant.

-------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Texas, Laredo

No. 5:02cr414

--------------------

Before SMITH, BENAVIDES, and PICKERING Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: *

Appellant Eulogio Dominguez-Gonzales challenges his felony illegal reentry conviction under

8 U.S.C. § 1325(a) on the ground that his prior misdemeanor conviction for i llegal entry was the

result of an uncounseled plea and, t herefore, was improperly used to enhance the instant felony

offense. Appellant’s misdemeanor conviction resulted in a stand-alone sentence of probation that did

not carry with it a term of imprisonment or a suspended sentence. Accordingly, he was not entitled

to counsel when he pleaded guilty to the misdemeanor charge. S ee United States v. Perez-Macias

,1 Appellant challenges this Court’s holding in Perez-Macias . He concedes that the

decision in Perez-Macias is binding on the Court, but raises the issue to preserve it for further

review.

2 335 F.3d 421, 427-28 (5th Cir. 2003). 1 A ppellant attem

pts to distinguish Perez-Macias because the

court later revoked his probation and imposed a jail sentence. Nothing in P erez-Macias , however,

“suggests that the plea and the conviction based on that guilty plea should be retroactively vacated

because the defendant violated the terms of his probation and the court found it necessary to revoke

the probation.” U

nited States v. Rios-Cruz

, No. 03-40074, 2004 WL 1469290, at *1 (5th Cir. May

17, 2004). Because there was no Sixth Amendment violation with respect to Appellant’s prior

misdemeanor conviction, this conviction properly served to enhance the instant offense. S ee Nichols

v. United States , 511 U.S. 738, 748-49 (1994); Perez-Macias

, 335 F.3d at 428-29. We, therefore,

affirm.

AFFIRMED.
#### § 422.525 Where applications and other forms are available.

All applications and related forms prescribed for use in the programs administered by the Social Security Administration pursuant to the provisions of titles II and XVIII of the act, and part B of title IV of the Federal Coal Mine Health and Safety Act of 1969 are printed under the specifications of the Administration and distributed free of charge to the public, institutions, or organizations for the purposes described therein. All prescribed forms can be obtained upon request from any social security district office or branch office (see § 422.5). Forms appropriate for use in requesting payment for services provided under the health insurance for the aged and disabled programs can also be obtained from the intermediaries or carriers (organizations under contract with the Social Security Administration to make payment for such services) without charge. Form 2031 (Waiver Certificate to Elect Social Security Coverage for Use by Ministers, Certain Members of Religious Orders, and Christian Science Practitioners), Form 4029 (Application for Exemption From Tax on Self-Employment Income and Waiver of Benefits), Form 4361 (Application for Exemption From Self-Employment Tax for Use by Ministers, Members of Religious Orders, and Christian Science Practitioners), Form 4415 (Election to Exempt From Self-Employment Coverage Fees Received by Certain Public Officers and Employees of a State or a Political Subdivision Thereof), Form SS-4 (Application for Employer Identification Number), Form SS-4A (Agricultural Employer's Application for Identification Number), Form SS-5 (Application for a Social Security Number (or Replacement of Lost Card)), Form SS-15 (Certificate Waiving Exemption From Taxes Under the FICA), and Form SS-15a (List of Concurring Employees) can also be obtained without charge from offices of the Internal Revenue Service. For other offices where applications and certain other forms can be obtained, see subparts B and C of this part 422.

[38 FR 11452, May 8, 1973]
### §2593. Repealed. Pub. L. 105–277, div. G, subdiv. A, title XII, §1222, Oct. 21, 1998, 112 Stat. 2681–768

Section, Pub. L. 87–297, title IV, §50, formerly §53, as added Pub. L. 100–213, §6(a), Dec. 24, 1987, 101 Stat. 1446; renumbered §50 Pub. L. 103–236, title VII, §717(a)(2), Apr. 30, 1994, 108 Stat. 498, related to Inspector General of the Arms Control and Disarmament Agency.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date of Repeal

Repeal effective Apr. 1, 1999, see section 1201 of Pub. L. 105–277, set out as an Effective Date note under section 6511 of this title.
VALENTINO B LEE

,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA

,

Appellee

. IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO

FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND

DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED

CASE NO. 1D 17

- 3292

________ _____________________/

Opinion filed December 4, 2017.

An appeal from the Circuit Court for Duval County

. Mark J. Borello , Judge

.

Valentino B Lee, pro se

, Appellant.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, and Bryan Jordan, Senior Assistant Attorney

General , Tallahassee , for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.

LEWIS, MAKAR, and OSTERHAUS, JJ., CONCUR.
FILED

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

ELEVENTH CIRCUIT

NOVEMBER 15, 2007

THOMAS K. KAHN

CLERK

 [DO NOT PUBLISH]

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT

________________________

No. 07-12752

Non-Argument Calendar

________________________

D. C. Docket No. 06-00339-CV-H-S

GREGORY HAYES, 

Plaintiff-Appellant, 

versus 

THE HARTFORD LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY, 

d.b.a. Benefit Management Services, 

Defendant-Appellee. 

________________________

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Northern District of Alabama

_________________________

(November 15, 2007)

Before CARNES, BARKETT and WILSON, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:
2

Gregory Hayes (“Hayes”), appeals from the district court’s grant of

summary judgment in favor of The Hartford Life Insurance Company

(“Hartford”). We review the district court’s rulings on motion for summary

judgment de novo, applying the same legal standards that governed the district

court. Williams v. BellSouth Telecomms. Inc., 373 F.3d 1132, 1134 (11th Cir.

2004).

This is an ERISA case. Hartford, the insurer and plan administrator, denied

Hayes long-term disability benefits because Hartford concluded that Hayes was

capable of working in a “light to sedentary range” occupation. The district court

found, and the parties agree, that the framework for reviewing Hartford’s decision

is the heightened arbitrary and capricious standard. Williams, 373 F.3d at 1137-

38. The first prong of this standard is to conduct de novo review “to determine

whether the claim administrator’s benefits-denial decision is ‘wrong’ ( i.e., the

court disagrees with the administrator’s decision); if it is not, then end the inquiry

and affirm the decision.” Id. at 1138 (footnote omitted).

Here, we do not proceed past the first prong. Hayes, who was a

commercially-licensed truck driver for ten years, concedes that he has the physical

ability to perform sedentary to light occupations, but only contends that he does

not have the intellectual ability for any occupation within the sedentary to light
3

occupation range. Hartford produced evidence that Hayes had the education,

training, or experience to perform various occupations within the sedentary to

light occupational range, such as a loading inspector, truck safety inspector, or

perishable-freight inspector. Upon a thorough consideration of the record, we

agree with the district court; the evidence indicates that Hayes has the intellectual

capacity to perform work in the sedentary to light occupational range.

Accordingly, we affirm.

AFFIRMED.