alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
DENY and Opinion Filed December 14, 2020 

S 

In The 

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-20-00958-CV 

IN RE TEXAS ALCOHOL AND BEVERAGE COMMISSION AND A. 

BENTLEY NETTLES, Relators 

Original Proceeding from the 193rd Judicial District Court 

Dallas County, Texas 

Trial Court Cause No. DC-20-16251 

MEMORANDUM OPINION 

Before Justices Whitehill, Pedersen, III, and Carlyle 

Opinion by Justice Whitehill 

Relators’ November 4, 2020 petition for writ of mandamus asks us to compel 

the trial court to vacate its temporary restraining order. Before the Court is relators’ 

November 25, 2020 agreed motion to dismiss. In their motion, relators advise us that 

the parties have entered into an agreement resolving their disputes. Accordingly, we 

grant the motion and dismiss the original proceeding. TEX. R. APP. P. 42.1(a)(2). 

Also before the Court is relators’ November 5, 2020 motion for 

reconsideration of the Court’s earlier denial of their motion for temporary relief. 

Having dismissed the original proceeding, we also deny the motion for 
 –2– 

reconsideration as moot. 

190958F.P05 

/Bill Whitehill/ 

BILL WHITEHILL 

JUSTICE
EXHIBIT 11



                      FIRST KEYSTONE CORPORATION
               COMPUTATION OF EARNINGS PER COMMON SHARE

             For the Nine Month Period Ended September 30,
                            2003  and  2002

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>

(Dollars in Thousands)
                                               2003             2002

                                          <c>              <c>
Primary
  Net Income                                 $        5,469   $        4,939
    Shares
      Weighted average number of
      common shares outstanding                   2,951,391        2,974,288
      Adjustments - increases or
      decreases                                        None             None
      Weighted average number of
      common shares outstanding
      as adjusted                                 2,951,391        2,974,288

      Primary earnings per
      common share                           $    1.85        $    1.66


Assuming full dilution
  Net Income                                 $        5,469   $        4,939
    Shares
      Weighted average number of
      common shares outstanding                   2,951,391        2,974,288
      Adjustments - increases or
      decreases                                       7,436            3,242
      Weighted average number of
      common shares outstanding
      as adjusted                                 2,958,827        2,977,530

      Earnings per common share
      assuming full dilution                 $    1.85        $    1.66

</TABLE>


                                   26
Exhibit 10.14


Summary Translation


Collateral Pledge Renewal Agreement


(Contract No. 2018-2800030600)


 


Pledgor : Wuhan Kingold Jewelry Co., Ltd.


Pledgee: Evergrowing Bank Co., Ltd., Yantai
Huanshan Road Branch


 


In consideration of the mutual promises,
covenants and agreements, Pledgor and Pledgee agree as follows:


1. Pledged asset: Gold (Collateral).


2. Details of the pledged asset are set
forth in the “Collateral List” attached to this Agreement.


3. Debtor’s obligation under the
loan agreement: RMB FIVE HUNDRED MILLION; interest rate of 6.5%; and Maturity Date: 10/2/2019, as set forth in the loan agreement
between Wuhan Kangbo Biotech Limited and Evergrowing Bank Co., Ltd. Yantai Huanshan Road Branch (Evergrowing Bank No. 28000306011).


5. Scope of Guarantee: the principal, interest,
penalty interest, liquidated damages, damage awards, collection fees, legal costs (or arbitration fees), asset safekeeping fees,
execution fees, attorneys’ fees, announcement fees, evaluation fees, auction fees and other relevant fees.


The remaining terms and conditions of this
renewal agreement are substantially identical to that of the original collateral pledge agreement by the parties entered into on
February 16, 2017.


 


Date: September 28, 2018


 


/seal/ Evergrowing Bank Co., Ltd.,
Yantai Huanshan Road Branch


 


/seal/ Wuhan Kingold Jewelry Co.,
Ltd
#### The People of the State of New York ex rel. Peter Fitzgerald, Respondent, v. Charles D. Collins, Appellant.

Judgment of the County Court and judgment of Court of Special Sessions reversed. Held, that the failure of the justice to keep any minutes of the testimony renders it impossible to determine that part of defendant’s appeal which alleges that his conviction is unsupported by evidence. *(People*v. *Giles,*12 App. Div. 495; 152 N. Y. 136; *People ex rel. Commissioner*v. *Benson,*63 App. Div. 142; *People*v. *Hines,*57 id. 419.) All concurred.
<PAGE>   1
                                       23

                                   Exhibit 11


                STATEMENT RE:  COMPUTATION OF PER SHARE EARNINGS


<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                        Nine Month Period Ended,     Quarter Ending
                             September 30,             September 30,
                           1995       1994          1995       1994     
                       -------------------------------------------------
<S>                        <C>        <C>           <C>        <C>
Earnings Per share:

Primary                    $1.29      $1.34         $ .46      $ .50

Fully
diluted                    $1.29      $1.34         $ .46      $ .50
</TABLE>

Primary and fully diluted earnings per share are calculated using the following
number of adjusted weighted average shares outstanding:

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                        Nine Month Period Ended,      Quarter Ending
                              september 30,            September 30,
                            1995        1994         1995       1994     
                       --------------------------------------------------
<S>                      <C>         <C>          <C>         <C>
Primary                  4,451,522   4,431,372    4,451,621   4,445,387

Fully
diluted                  4,451,538   4,447,108    4,451,733   4,450,186
</TABLE>


The weighted average number of shares outstanding is adjusted to recognize the
dilutive effect, if any, of outstanding employee stock options on both a
primary and fully diluted basis.

The calculations of earnings per share above are based on the weighted average
number of shares outstanding including all common stock and common stock
equivalents in conformity with the instructions for Item 601 of Regulation S-K.
The calculation of earnings per share for financial reporting purposes is based
on the weighted average number of shares outstanding of 4,407,840 and 4,391,468
at September 30, 1995 and September 30, 1994, respectively, without giving
effect to the common stock equivalents resulting from the assumed exercise of
stock options, which do not dilute earnings per share by more than 3 percent,
in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles.
Comments on Peer Review Documents on “Meta-Analysis of Willingness to Pay for Water Quality 

Improvements”

June 3, 2015

All five reviewers commend the EPA authors for their work on this project. This is clearly an important, 

and difficult, task and the reviewers understand that. Their suggestions are meant to improve this 

document in several dimensions.

I would like to highlight some topics that appear in all the reviews’ comments. First, it is always 

problematic to use research to answer questions that are outside the scope of the analysis itself. This 

occurs when trying to quantify relationships outside of the original range of data in regression analysis, 

and when conducting meta-analysis which includes variables not in the original studies. It occurs when 

the studies used are partial equilibrium analyses, but need to be used to estimate full equilibrium 

outcomes. But by clearly outlining what is being done, and by discussing the problems with doing this, 

the authors of the EPA study can make it clear why this is necessary.

The reviewers have pointed out some areas of the paper that they feel could use clarification through 

better descriptions, or through explanatory examples. It is important to remember that the audience 

for this work may not be as familiar with some of the techniques being used, so clarity will be key. 

Most reviewers questioned the assumption on the 100 mile distance used. A survey of what is used in 

the literature would be helpful. Additionally, sensitivity analysis might make clear the costs of this 

assumption. Sensitivity analysis on other assumptions and model specifications would also be helpful, 

as suggested by the reviewers.

In the discussion of the two models, MRM1 and MRM2, more direct comparisons are called for by 

several reviewers. This is mentioned in the report itself, so it is assumed that this work is in progress. In 

addition, the suggestion that a table be included that highlights the strengths and weaknesses of the 

two specifications is good. Again, an audience that is not as familiar with the two models, but who 

needs to choose between them for a particular situation, would find such a table very helpful. 

As mentioned by several reviewers, this document suggests several areas for future research. 

Highlighting those areas, and discussing what exactly would be needed, will be a valuable resource for 

the EPA and for researchers in these areas.
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

                             Washington, D.C. 20549
                             ----------------------

                                    FORM 6-K

                        REPORT OF FOREIGN PRIVATE ISSUER

                    Pursuant to Rule 13a-16 or 15d-16 of the
                         Securities Exchange Act of 1934



For the month of: February 2003



                               Given Imaging Ltd.
               (Exact name of registrant as specified in charter)



                    2 Ha'Carmel Street, Yoqneam 20692, Israel
                    (Address of principal executive offices)



         Indicate by check mark whether the registrant files or will file annual
reports under cover Form 20-F or Form 40-F.

                           Form 20-F   X             Form 40-F
                                      ---                        ---


         Indicate by check mark whether the registrant by furnishing the
information contained in this Form is also thereby furnishing the information to
the Commission pursuant to Rule 12g3-2(b) under the Securities Exchange Act of
1934.

                           Yes                       No   X
                                 ---                     ---


<PAGE>

                               Given Imaging Ltd.


The following exhibits are filed as part of this Form 6-K:


Exhibit           Description


A.        Press  release  dated  February  12,  2003  entitled   "Given  Imaging
          Announces Fourth Quarter and Year End 2002 Results."




<PAGE>



                                    SIGNATURE

     Pursuant to the  requirements  of the Securities  Exchange Act of 1934, the
registrant  has duly  caused  this  report  to be  signed  on its  behalf by the
undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.


                               GIVEN IMAGING LTD.


Date: February 18, 2003        By: /s/ Zvi Ben David
                                   ---------------------------
                                   Name:   Zvi Ben David
                                   Title:  Vice President and
                                           Chief Financial Officer
###### Editorial Note on Part 416

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 416 appear at 68 FR 53509, Sept. 11, 2003.

#### § 416.962 Medical-vocational profiles showing an inability to make an adjustment to other work.

(a) *If you have done only arduous unskilled physical labor.* If you have no more than a marginal education (*see* § 416.964) and work experience of 35 years or more during which you did only arduous unskilled physical labor, and you are not working and are no longer able to do this kind of work because of a severe impairment(s) (*see* §§ 416.920(c), 416.921, and 416.923), we will consider you unable to do lighter work, and therefore, disabled.

# Example to paragraph (a):

B is a 58-year-old miner's helper with a fourth grade education who has a lifelong history of unskilled arduous physical labor. B says that he is disabled because of arthritis of the spine, hips, and knees, and other impairments. Medical evidence shows a “severe” combination of impairments that prevents B from performing his past relevant work. Under these circumstances, we will find that B is disabled.

(b) *If you are at least 55 years old, have no more than a limited education, and have no past relevant work experience.* If you have a severe, medically determinable impairment(s) (*see* §§ 416.920(c), 416.921, and 416.923), are of advanced age (age 55 or older, *see* § 416.963), have a limited education or less (*see* § 416.964), and have no past relevant work experience (*see* § 416.965), we will find you disabled. If the evidence shows that you meet this profile, we will not need to assess your residual functional capacity or consider the rules in appendix 2 to subpart P of part 404 of this chapter.

[68 FR 51166, Aug. 26, 2003]
I 

114TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 4267 

To provide that no penalty may be imposed on a State for refusing to 

expend refugee resettlement assistance funds on certain refugees, and 

for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

DECEMBER 16, 2015 

Mr. COLLINS of New York (for himself, Mr. KINZINGER of Illinois, Mr. JOHNSON of Ohio, Mr. BUCSHON, and Mr. LATTA) introduced the following 

bill; which was referred to the Committee on the Judiciary 

A BILL 

To provide that no penalty may be imposed on a State 

for refusing to expend refugee resettlement assistance 

funds on certain refugees, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Resettlement RE5 FORM (Re-Evaluation of Financing Our Refugee Mis6 sion) Act’’. 


SSpencer on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 4267 IH

1 SEC. 2. NO PENALTY FOR REFUSAL TO EXPEND REFUGEE 

2 ASSISTANCE FUNDS ON CERTAIN REFUGEES. 

3 Section 412 of the Immigration and Nationality Act 

4 (8 U.S.C. 1522) is amended by adding at the end the fol5 lowing: 

6 ‘‘(g) LIMITATION.— 

7 ‘‘(1) IN GENERAL.—Notwithstanding any other 

8 provision of this section, a State, without penalty 

9 under this section or any other provision of law, may 

10 refuse to expend funds received under this section 

11 with respect to an alien described in paragraph (2), 

12 except that a State may not refuse to expend such 

13 funds with respect to an alien described in section 

14 1244(b) of the Refugee Crisis in Iraq Act of 2007 

15 (8 U.S.C. 1157 note). 

16 ‘‘(2) ALIENS DESCRIBED.—An alien is de17 scribed in this paragraph if the alien— 

18 ‘‘(A) is a national of a country that is a 

19 state sponsor of terrorism or a terrorist sanc20 tuary; or 

21 ‘‘(B) has no nationality and the country in 

22 which the alien last habitually resided is a state 

23 sponsor of terrorism or a terrorist sanctuary. 

24 ‘‘(3) DEFINITIONS.—In this subsection: 

25 ‘‘(A) STATE SPONSOR OF TERRORISM.— 

26 The term ‘state sponsor of terrorism’ means 


SSpencer on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
3 

•HR 4267 IH

1 any country the government of which the Sec2 retary of State has determined has repeatedly 

3 provided support for international terrorism 

4 pursuant to— 

5 ‘‘(i) section 6(j) of the Export Admin6 istration Act of 1979 (50 U.S.C. App. 

7 2405); 

8 ‘‘(ii) section 620A of the Foreign As9 sistance Act of 1961 (22 U.S.C. 2371); or 

10 ‘‘(iii) section 40 of the Arms Export 

11 Control Act (22 U.S.C. 2780). 

12 ‘‘(B) TERRORIST SANCTUARY.—The term 

13 ‘terrorist sanctuary’ has the meaning given the 

14 term in section 140(d)(5) of the Foreign Rela15 tions Authorization Act, Fiscal Years 1988 and 

16 1989 (22 U.S.C. 2656f (d)(5)).’’. 

Æ 


SSpencer on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 72 (Thursday, April 14, 2011)]
[Notices]
[Page 20957]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2011-9019]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration

RIN 0648-XA363


Marine Mammals; File No. 14352

AGENCY: National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and 
Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), Commerce.

ACTION: Notice; issuance of permit amendment.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given that Dr. Gregory Bossart, Georgia 
Aquarium, 225 Baker Street, NW., Atlanta, GA 30313 has been issued a 
major amendment to Permit No. 14352.

ADDRESSES: The permit amendment and related documents are available for 
review upon written request or by appointment in the following offices:
    Permits, Conservation and Education Division, Office of Protected 
Resources, NMFS, 1315 East-West Highway, Room 13705, Silver Spring, MD 
20910; phone (301) 713-2289; fax (301) 713-0376; and
    Southeast Region, NMFS, 263 13th Avenue South, Saint Petersburg, 
Florida 33701; phone (727) 824-5312; fax (727) 824-5309.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Carrie Hubard or Kristy Beard, (301) 
713-2289.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: On August 6, 2010, notice was published in 
the Federal Register (75 FR 47537) that a request for an amendment to 
Permit No. 14352 to conduct research on bottlenose dolphins (Tursiops 
truncatus) had been submitted by the above-named applicant. The 
requested permit amendment has been issued under the authority of the 
Marine Mammal Protection Act of 1972, as amended (16 U.S.C. 1361 et 
seq.), and the regulations governing the taking and importing of marine 
mammals (50 CFR part 216).
    The permit has been amended to authorize research in a new study 
area: Charleston, South Carolina. Fifty bottlenose dolphins may be 
captured, sampled, and released in Charleston annually. Captured 
dolphins will receive a health assessment clinical workup. All captured 
animals will receive a roto tag. Up to ten animals per year will also 
receive a VHF tag. Samples will be analyzed to examine a variety of 
health topics such as: infectious diseases, immune status, contaminant 
exposure, antibiotic resistance, and genetics. An additional 400 
dolphins per year may be harassed during pre- and post-capture surveys. 
The amended permit is valid until October 31, 2014.
    In compliance with the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969 
(42 U.S.C. 4321 et seq.), a final determination has been made that the 
activity proposed is categorically excluded from the requirement to 
prepare an environmental assessment or environmental impact statement.

    Dated: April 6, 2011.
P. Michael Payne,
Chief, Permits, Conservation and Education Division, Office of 
Protected Resources, National Marine Fisheries Service.
[FR Doc. 2011-9019 Filed 4-13-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-22-P
#### Peoples National Bank of Brooklyn, in New York, Respondent, v. Jacob Manneschmidt, Jr., Appellant.

Appeal dismissed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements. Ho opinion. Jenks, P. J., Burr, Carr, Stapleton and Putnam, JJ., concurred.
USGS HomeContact USGSSearch USGS

Open-File Report 2014-1203

### Maps Showing Bathymetry and Modern Sediment Thickness on the Inner Continental Shelf Offshore of Fire Island, New York, Pre-Hurricane Sandy

----

AccessibilityFOIAPrivacyPolicies and Notices

U.S. Department of the Interior |            U.S. Geological Survey                                                URL: http://pubs.usgs.gov/of/2014/1203/ofr2014-1203-methods.html            Page Contact Information: GS Pubs Web Contact                        Page Last Modified: Thursday, November 06, 2014, 05:28:41 PM
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.1

                    CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
            PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

      Solely for the purpose of complying with 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, I, the undersigned
Chief Executive Officer of Alliance Pharmaceutical Corp. (the "Company"), hereby
certify, based on my knowledge, that the Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of the
Company for the quarter ended December 31, 2007 (the "Report") fully complies
with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities and Exchange
Act of 1934 and that information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.

Date:  February 12, 2008



BY: /s/ DUANE J. ROTH
   ------------------------------------
        Duane J. Roth
        Chief Executive Officer
-       - Superintendent of Documents
      - 2023-08-30T20:50:34-0400
      - Government Publishing Office, Washington, DC 20401
      - Government Publishing Office
      - Government Publishing Office attests that this document has not been altered since it was disseminated by Government Publishing Office
### §2152a. Repealed. Pub. L. 108–484, §8(a), Dec. 23, 2004, 118 Stat. 3931

Section, Pub. L. 87–195, pt. I, §131, as added Pub. L. 106–309, title I, §105, Oct. 17, 2000, 114 Stat. 1082; amended Pub. L. 108–31, §3, June 17, 2003, 117 Stat. 776, related to microenterprise development grant assistance.
Exhibit
23.1




FAX
      (303) 623-4258621
      SEVENTEENTH STREET
                SUITE
      1550
                DENVER,
      COLOARDO 80293
                TELEPHONE
      (303) 623-9147







CONSENT
OF INDEPENDENT PETROLEUM ENGINEERS




As independent petroleum and natural
gas consultants, we hereby consent to the reference of our name in the Report on
Form 10-K for the years ending December 31, 2008 and December 31, 2007 of PDC
2005B (the “Partnership”).  We have no interest of a substantial or
material nature in the Partnership, or in any affiliate.  We have not
been employed on a contingent basis, and we are not connected with the
Partnership, or any affiliate as a promoter, underwriter, voting trustee,
director, officer, employee or affiliate.






/s/ Ryder Scott Company,
    L.P.Ryder
      Scot Company, LPDenver,
      ColoradoApril
      24, 2009







1100
      LOUISIANA, SUITE 3800
                
                HOUSTON,
      TEXAS 77002-5218
                
                TEL
      (713) 651-9191
                
                FAX
      (713) 651-08491100,
      530-8TH STREET, S.W.
                
                CALGARY,
      ALBERTA T2P 2W2
                
                TEL
      (403) 262-2799
                
                FAX
      (403) 262-2790
§ 618.760 Qualifying requirements for, and timing and duration of, Additional Trade Readjustment Allowances. ( a ) *Qualifying requirements for Additional TRA.* An AAW is eligible to receive Additional TRA for any week only if: ( 1 ) The worker meets all qualifying requirements for receipt of Basic TRA in § 618.720; and
( 2 ) Except as provided in § 618.775 for a break in training, the AAW is participating in approved training.
( b ) *Timing and duration of Additional TRA.* Additional TRA is payable for up to 65 weeks during the 78 consecutive calendar week period that: ( 1 ) Immediately follows the last week of entitlement to Basic TRA otherwise payable to the AAW;
( 2 ) Begins with the first week of approved training, if such training begins after the last week described in paragraph (b)(1) of this section; or
( 3 ) Begins with the first week in which such training is approved under subpart F of this part, if such training is approved after the training already has commenced (although Additional TRA or training costs may not be paid for any week before the week in which the TAA approved training was approved).