alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
### IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 15

- 41713 Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

,

Plaintiff

- Appellee

v.

ROY WILLIAM STOJENTIN

,

Defendant

- Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. 1:15

- CR

- 631

- 1

Before JONES, CLEMENT, and OWEN, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: *
Appealing the judgment in a criminal case, Roy William Stojentin raises
an argument that is foreclosed by United States v. Betancourt , 586 F.3d 303,

308

- 09 (5th Cir. 2009), which held that knowledge of drug type and quantity is

not an element of a 21 U.S.C . § 841 offense. Accordingly, the motion for
summary disposition is GRANTED, and the judgment of the district court is

AFFIRMED.

* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5 , the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit 

### FILED
June 21 , 2016
Lyle W. Cayce Clerk Case: 15-41713 Document: 00513557867 Page: 1 Date Filed: 06/21/2016
## Breadcrumb

-  Justice.gov 
-  U.S. Attorneys 
-  Resources 
-  Annual Statistical Reports 

# Annual Statistical Reports

                      -  Facebook 
                      -  X 
                      -  LinkedIn 
                      -  Email 

The annual statistical reports for the Offices of the United States Attorneys contain statistical tables displaying both national and district caseload data, covering the many priorities of the United States Attorneys in both criminal prosecution and civil litigation.

All reports require Adobe Acrobat Reader, available for free on the Adobe website.
§ 618.350 Individual employment plans for trade-affected workers. ( a ) A State must: ( 1 ) Make available an IEP; and
( 2 ) Document an IEP for any trade-affected worker seeking training under subpart F of this part or a job search allowance under subpart D of this part, before the worker receives those benefits and services.
( b ) An IEP must use the results of the initial and, if available, comprehensive and specialized assessments to assist in documenting a strategy to provide the trade-affected worker with the services needed to obtain employment, including the items listed in paragraph (c) of this section.
( c ) An IEP must document: ( 1 ) The trade-affected worker's employment goal, including the targeted occupation and industry;
( 2 ) The training program proposed, if any;
( 3 ) Any services that will be needed by the worker to obtain suitable employment, including career services, supportive services provided through partner programs, and post-training case management services;
( 4 ) If applicable, any supplemental assistance (subsistence or transportation payments) required for participation in training and the basis for their calculation; and
( 5 ) The worker's responsibilities under the plan.
( d ) If an IEP has been previously developed with a trade-affected worker by a partner program, it must be reviewed once the worker becomes TAA Program-eligible to ensure it has the components required by paragraph (c) of this section. If the IEP does not contain the components, the IEP must be supplemented by the State in conjunction with the worker to ensure it is fully compliant with the TAA Program requirements in this part.
( e ) The State must monitor the progress of the trade-affected worker in meeting the worker's responsibilities as listed in the IEP, including attendance and achievement in approved training programs.
( f ) ( 1 ) The State must modify the IEP as necessary to facilitate a successful performance outcome for the trade-affected worker.
( 2 ) The modification must be done with the worker's input.
( 3 ) At a minimum, the IEP must be modified when there is a change in the training program, receipt of supplemental assistance, or both.
( g ) The State must make the trade-affected worker aware of the advantages of receiving an IEP. However, a worker may refuse to complete an IEP. Since portions of the IEP are necessary to determine eligibility for job search allowances under subpart D of this part and training under subpart F of this part, a worker's refusal to provide necessary information, either as part of the IEP or outside of the IEP process, may result in a denial of a those benefits and services. This is detailed further in subparts D and F of this part.
THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS

13-13-00341-CV

JOHNNY PARTAIN

v.

CONTABLE J. E. 'EDDIE' GUERRA, HIDALGO COUNTY PRECINCT 4 IN HIS 

OFFICIAL CAPACITY AND JAMES H. MAPLES, ET AL.

On Appeal from the

332nd District Court of Hidalgo County, Texas

Trial Cause No. C-0929-12-F

JUDGMENT

THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS, having considered this cause on 

appeal, concludes the judgment of the trial court should be REVERSED and the cause 

REMANDED to the trial court. The Court orders the judgment of the trial court

REVERSED and REMANDED for further proceedings consistent with its opinion. Costs 

of the appeal are adjudged against appellee.

We further order this decision certified below for observance.

July 2, 2015
### **CHAPTER 30—INTERNATIONAL COOPERATION IN HEALTH AND MEDICAL RESEARCH**

Sec.
2101.
Statement of purpose.
2102.
Authority of Secretary.
2103.
Authority of President.
2104.
Authority of Federal officers and agencies unaffected.
[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 78 (Friday, April 22, 2011)]
[Notices]
[Page 22705]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2011-9787]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM


Formations of, Acquisitions by, and Mergers of Bank Holding 
Companies

    The companies listed in this notice have applied to the Board for 
approval, pursuant to the Bank Holding Company Act of 1956 (12 U.S.C. 
1841 et seq.) (BHC Act), Regulation Y (12 CFR part 225), and all other 
applicable statutes and regulations to become a bank holding company 
and/or to acquire the assets or the ownership of, control of, or the 
power to vote shares of a bank or bank holding company and all of the 
banks and nonbanking companies owned by the bank holding company, 
including the companies listed below.
    The applications listed below, as well as other related filings 
required by the Board, are available for immediate inspection at the 
Federal Reserve Bank indicated. The application also will be available 
for inspection at the offices of the Board of Governors. Interested 
persons may express their views in writing on the standards enumerated 
in the BHC Act (12 U.S.C. 1842(c)). If the proposal also involves the 
acquisition of a nonbanking company, the review also includes whether 
the acquisition of the nonbanking company complies with the standards 
in section 4 of the BHC Act (12 U.S.C. 1843). Unless otherwise noted, 
nonbanking activities will be conducted throughout the United States.
    Unless otherwise noted, comments regarding each of these 
applications must be received at the Reserve Bank indicated or the 
offices of the Board of Governors not later than May 19, 2011.
    A. Federal Reserve Bank of Atlanta (Clifford Stanford, Vice 
President) 1000 Peachtree Street, NE., Atlanta, Georgia 30309:
    1. PB Bancshares, Inc., Employee Stock Ownership Plan, Clifton, 
Tennessee; to become a bank holding company by retaining 27.34 percent 
of the voting shares of PB Bancshares, Inc., and Peoples Bank, both in 
Clifton, Tennessee.

Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, April 19, 2011.
Jennifer J. Johnson,
Secretary of the Board.
[FR Doc. 2011-9787 Filed 4-21-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6210-01-P
<PAGE>


                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.1

                    CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
            PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

Solely for the purpose of complying with 18 U.S.C. ss.1350, as adopted pursuant
to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, I, the undersigned Chief
Executive Officer of Alliance Pharmaceutical Corp. (the "Company"), hereby
certify, based on my knowledge, that the Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of the
Company for the three months ended September 30, 2004 (the "Report") fully
complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities and Exchange
Act of 1934 and that information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.

Date:  November 9, 2004






BY: /s/ DUANE J. ROTH
    -----------------------------
        Duane J. Roth
        Chief Executive Officer
### Part I—Declaration of Policy
### §262i. Repealed. Pub. L. 101–240, title V, §541(d)(6), Dec. 19, 1989, 103 Stat. 2518

Section, Pub. L. 96–259, title IV, §401, June 3, 1980, 94 Stat. 431, related to communication and dissemination of information respecting export opportunity enhancement.
ARMED SERVICES BOARD OF CONTRACT APPEALS 

Application Under the Equal Access ) 

to Justice Act -- ) 

) 

Kelly-Ryan, Inc. ) 

) 

Under Contract No. W911KB-05-C-0016 ) 

APPEARANCES FOR THE APPELLANT: 

APPEARANCES FOR THE GOVERNMENT: 

ASBCA No. 57168 

Dale R. Martin, Esq. 

Abigail Z. Staggers, Esq. 

Barokas Martin & Tomlinson 

Seattle, WA 

Michael P. Goodman, Esq. 

Engineer Chief Trial Attorney 

Carl F. Olson, Esq. 

Engineer Trial Attorney 

U.S. Army Engineer District, Alaska 

ORDER OF DISMISSAL 

The parties have advised the Board they have resolved the dispute regarding 

appellant's application for attorney fees, costs and expenses under the Equal Access to 

Justice Act, 5 U.S.C. § 504, and have requested that the appeal be dismissed with prejudice. 

Accordingly, for good cause shown, the appeal is dismissed with prejudice. This dismissal 

leaves no appeals remaining before the Board arising from the performance of Contract 

No. W911KB-05-C-0016. The Board commends the parties for their successful efforts to 

resolve the dispute. 

Dated: August 15, 2018 

Administrative Judge 

Armed Services Board 

of Contract Appeals 
I certify that the foregoing is a true copy of the Order of Dismissal of the Armed 

Services Board of Contract Appeals on an application for fees and other expenses incurred 

in connection with ASBCA No. 57168, Appeal of Kelly-Ryan, Inc., rendered in accordance 

with 5 U.S.C. § 504. 

Dated: 

2 

JEFFREY D. GARDIN 

Recorder, Armed Services 

Board of Contract Appeals
§ 1001.160 What is the purpose and scope of this part? ( a ) The purpose of this part is to fulfill the requirement of 38 U.S.C. 4102A(c)(3)(B) to establish a uniform national threshold entered employment rate (UNTEER) achieved for veterans and eligible persons by the State employment service delivery systems. We will use the UNTEER as part of the review process for determining whether a State's program year EER is deficient and a Corrective Action Plan (CAP) is required of that State employment service delivery system.
( b ) This part is applicable to all State agencies that are recipients of Wagner-Peyser State Grants, and/or Jobs for Veterans State Grants.
EXHIBIT 13.2

Certification by the Chief Financial Officer

Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of China Medical Technologies Inc. (the Company) on Form 20-F for the
fiscal year ended March 31, 2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Takyung (Sam) Tsang, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:

(1) The Report fully complies with the
requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly
presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Date: September 28, 2007



|       |  |                           
|------ |  | --------------------------
|By:    |  | /s/    TAKYUNG (SAM)
TSANG
|Name:  |  | Takyung (Sam) Tsang       
|Title: |  | Chief Financial Officer
EXHIBIT 32.1



           CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER
                PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

                      AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
          SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



     In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10Q of First
Keystone Corporation (the "Corporation") for the period ended March
31, 2010, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the
"Report"), I, J. Gerald Bazewicz, President and CEO, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as added by Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:

     1.   The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
          13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     2.   The information contained in the Report fairly presents,
          in all material respects, the financial condition and
          results of operations of the Corporation as of and for the
          period covered by the Report.




                            /s/ J. Gerald Bazewicz

                            J. Gerald Bazewicz
                            President and CEO


May 10, 2010
Exhibit 12
                  U S WEST Financial Services, Inc.
                  RATIO OF EARNINGS TO FIXED CHARGES
                        (Dollars in Thousands)
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>

                                                    Quarter Ended
                                                 3/31/98    3/31/97
------------------------------------------       --------   --------
<S>                                            <C>        <C>       
Income before income taxes                     $    1,025 $    6,671
Interest expense                                    7,729      5,424
Interest factor on rentals (1/3)                        2         21
                                                 --------  --------
Earnings                                       $    8,756 $   12,116

Interest expense                               $    7,729 $    5,424
Interest factor on rentals (1/3)                        2         21
                                                 --------  --------
Fixed charges                                  $    7,731 $    5,445

Ratio of earnings to fixed charges                   1.13       2.23
------------------------------------------       --------   --------
</TABLE>




A Termination Agreement and Guarantee was entered into on June 24, 1994
between U S WEST, Inc. and U S WEST Capital Corporation and U S WEST
Financial Services, Inc. (USWFS). The Agreement terminates the Support
Agreement dated January 5, 1990 whereby U S WEST, Inc. agreed to
provide financial support to USWFS.  The Agreement provides replacement
financial support in the form of a direct guarantee by U S WEST of all
outstanding indebtedness of USWFS.
UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
 Washington, D.C. 20549
 Form 8-K
 Current Report
Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
 Date of Report (Date of earliest event reported): June 30, 2011
 Comarco, Inc.
  000-05449
 California
(State or other jurisdiction of 
incorporation)
    
    95-2088894
(I.R.S. Employer Identification No.)
 25541 Commercentre Drive, Lake Forest, California
    
    92630-8870(Address of principal executive offices)
    
    (Zip Code)
 Registrants telephone number, including area code: (949) 599-7400
  o
    
    Written communications pursuant to Rule 425 under the Securities Act (17 CFR 230.425)
 o
    
    Soliciting material pursuant to Rule 14a-12 under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.14a-12)
 o
    
    Pre-commencement communications pursuant to Rule 14d-2(b) under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.14d-2(b))
 o
    
    Pre-commencement communications pursuant to Rule 13e-4(c) under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.13e-4(c))




---



##### 



Item 5.02
    
    Departure of Directors or Certain Officers; Election of Directors; Appointment of
Certain Officers; Compensatory Arrangements of Certain Officers.




---



##### 



SIGNATURE
  COMARCO, INC.Date:  July 6, 2011
    By:
    /s/ ALISHA K. CHARLTONAlisha K. CharltonChief Accounting Officer
### Regulatory Evaluation

Docket No. FAA

- 

### 2016

- 5044 Directorate Identifier: 

### 2014

- NM

- 166

- AD

If you make changes to the values in the table below, you must ensure the totals update accordingly. If

they do not, click (or Tab) into a nd then out of the changed cell

.

Estimated Costs:

Action

(e.g., Inspection,

replacement)

Do not include on

condition costs here Costs per Product (e.g., aircraft, engine,

propeller, appliance)

Work

- hours

(include

access, testing,

and close

- up) Labor

c ost

(@$8 5 /h

our) Parts Cost Total Costs

(labor +

parts) Number of

U.S.

Registered

Products Total Cost

for U.S. Fleet



### Inspection 1.5 $ 127.50 

### $0 $ 127.50 

### 75 $ 9,562.50



### Rectification 0.5 $ 42.50 

### $551 $ 593.50 

### 75 $ 44,512.50

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0. 00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00



### The known number of products in compliance:

Total Costs of compliance for U.S. fleet: $ 54,075



### Costs covered under warranty ( if known ) $

On

- Condition Costs:

Action

(e.g., Inspection,

replacement) Work

- hours

(include access,

testing, and close

up) Labor cost

(@$85/hour) Parts Cost Cost per Product

$ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0 .00 $ 0.00



### Special considerations for Economic Analysis ( Use this field to explain anything in the Estimated Costs table

that was assumed or might not be obvious. This field can also be used to explain warranty costs) 

### :

### Executive Order 12866:

Could the AD be considered a “significant regulatory action”?

YES * NO

* Explanation:

DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedures:

Is the AD significant?

YES * NO

* Explanation:

Regulatory Flexibility Act:

W ill the AD have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities? E xplain for

either a Yes or No answer.

YES NO

Explanation:

Intrastate Aviation in Alaska:

This AD could affect intrastate aviation in Alaska. Is it appropriate to include spe cific requirements for

aircraft operated in Alaska where aviation might be the only mode of transportation?

YES * NO



### * Explanation 

### :
Editorial Note on Part 416
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 416 appear at 68 FR 53509, Sept. 11, 2003.

§ 416.268 What is done to determine if you must have Medicaid in order to work. For us to determine that you need Medicaid benefits in order to continue to work, you must establish: ( a ) That you are currently using or have received services which were paid for by Medicaid during the period which began 12 months before our first contact with you to discuss this use; or
( b ) That you expect to use these services within the next 12 months; or
( c ) That you would need Medicaid to pay for unexpected medical expenses in the next 12 months.
[59 FR 41404, Aug. 12, 1994]
## F IRST 

## D ISTRICT 

## C OURT OF 

## A PPEAL 

## S TATE OF 

## F LORIDA

_____________________________
No. 1D 2024

- 0548

_____________________________
J ONATHAN a nd M EGAN M ARSHALL , Appellant s ,

v.

O KALOOSA C OUNTY S CHOOL B OARD , Appellee.

_____________________________

On appeal from an administrative order of the Okaloosa County School Board

. Lamar White, Chairman

. August 13, 2024

P ER C URIAM

.
D ISMISSED

.
L EWIS , B.L. T HOMAS , and L ONG , JJ., concur

.2 _____________________________ Not final until disposition of any timely and authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 9.331

.

_____________________________ Jonathan and Megan Marshall, pro se
, Appellant s

. Kyle S. Bauman, Fort Walton Beach
, for Appellee.
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,  AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of ALCO, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-QSB/A for the  period ended March 31, 2006 (the "Report"), I, Yip Kam Ming, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

> 1) The Report fully complies with the requirement of Section 13(a) or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange
> Act of 1934; and
> 
> 
> 2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the Company's
> financial position and results of operations.

/s/ Yip Kam Ming



Yip Kam Ming,

 Chief Financial Officer

September 14, 2006
ex_130418.htm


Exhibit 4.14


 


CERTIFICATE OF TRUST


 


THIS Certificate of Trust of Air T Funding (the “Trust”) is being duly executed and filed by the undersigned, not in their individual capacities, but solely as trustees, to form a statutory trust under the Delaware Statutory Trust Act (12 Del. C. § 3801 et seq. (the “Act”) :


 


• First: The name of the Trust is: Air T Funding


 


 


• Second: The name and business address of the Delaware Trustee, which is a Delaware state chartered trust company, is:


 


Delaware Trust Company


251 Little Falls Drive


Wilmington, Delaware 19808


Attn: Corporate Trust


 


IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned being all of the trustees of the Trust, have duly executed this Certificate of Trust in accordance with Section 3811(a)(1) of the Act.


 


 


 


	
			 

				
			 

				
			 

				
			 

			
	
			 

				
			 

				
			Brett Reynolds, As Administrative Trustee

				
			 

			
	
			 

				
			 

				
			 

				
			 

			
	 	 	 	 
	 	 	 	 
	 	 	 	 
	 	 	 	 
	 	 	 	 
	 	 	Mark Jundt, As Administrative Trustee	 



 


 


 


[Signatures Continue]


 



 




 




 


	
			 

				
			DELAWARE TRUST COMPANY, not in its


			individual capacity but solely


			as Delaware Trustee

				
			 

			
	
			 

				
			 

				
			 

				
			 

			
	
			 

				
			 

				
			 

				
			 

			
	
			 

				
			By: 

				
			 

				
			 

			
	
			 

				Name:	
			 

			
	 	Title: