alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 616.6 Definitions. These definitions apply for the purpose of this arrangement and the procedures issued to effectuate it. ( a ) *State.* “State” includes the States of the United States of America, the District of Columbia, the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico, and the Virgin Islands.
( b ) *State agency.* The agency which administers the unemployment compensation law of a State.
( c ) *Combined-Wage Claim.* A claim filed under this arrangement.
( d ) *Combined-Wage Claimant.* A claimant who has covered wages under the unemployment compensation law of more than one State and who has filed a claim under this arrangement.
( e ) *Paying State.* A single State against which the claimant files a Combined-Wage Claim, if the claimant has wages and employment in that State's base period(s) and the claimant qualifies for unemployment benefits under the unemployment compensation law of that State using combined wages and employment.
( f ) *Transferring State.* A State in which a Combined-Wage Claimant had covered employment and wages in the base period of a paying State, and which transfers such employment and wages to the paying State for its use in determining the benefit rights of such claimant under its law.
( g ) *Employment and wages.* “Employment” refers to all services which are covered under the unemployment compensation law of a State, whether expressed in terms of weeks of work or otherwise. “Wages” refers to all remuneration for such employment.
( h ) *Secretary.* The Secretary of Labor of the United States.
( i ) *Base period and benefit year.* The base period and benefit year applicable under the unemployment compensation law of the paying State.
[36 FR 24992, Dec. 28, 1971, as amended at 39 FR 45215, Dec. 31, 1974; 43 FR 2625, Jan. 17, 1978; 71 FR 35514, June 21, 2006; 73 FR 63072, Oct. 23, 2008]
#### § 498.108 Penalty and assessment not exclusive.

Penalties and assessments, as applicable, imposed under this part are in addition to any other penalties prescribed by law.

[61 FR 18080, Apr. 24, 1996]
Exhibit 32.2

Certification of Principal Financial Officer  Pursuant to  Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. 1350)

In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2007 (the "Report") of ATS Corporation (the
"Registrant"), as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, I, Pamela A. Little, Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the Registrant, hereby certify that:

(1)   The
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

(2)   The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant.

|Date: March 17, 2008 |  | By: | /s/ Pamela A. LittlePamela A. Little
Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
(Principal Financial Officer)
|-------------------- |  | --- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

---



QuickLinks
### §954. Transshipment and in-transit shipment of controlled substances

Notwithstanding sections 952, 953, and 957 of this title—

(1) A controlled substance in schedule I may—

(A) be imported into the United States for transshipment to another country, or

(B) be transferred or transshipped from one vessel, vehicle, or aircraft to another vessel, vehicle, or aircraft within the United States for immediate exportation,

if and only if it is so imported, transferred, or transshipped (i) for scientific, medical, or other legitimate purposes in the country of destination, and (ii) with the prior written approval of the Attorney General (which shall be granted or denied within 21 days of the request).

(2) A controlled substance in schedule II, III, or IV may be so imported, transferred, or transshipped if and only if advance notice is given to the Attorney General in accordance with regulations of the Attorney General.

(Pub. L. 91–513, title III, §1004, Oct. 27, 1970, 84 Stat. 1287.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

Schedules I, II, III, and IV, referred to in text, are set out in section 812(c) of this title.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date

Section effective on first day of seventh calendar month that begins after Oct. 26, 1970, see 1105(a) of Pub. L. 91–513, set out as a under section 951 of this title.
###### Editorial Note on Part 416

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 416 appear at 68 FR 53509, Sept. 11, 2003.

#### § 416.914 When we will purchase existing evidence.

We need specific medical evidence to determine whether you are disabled or blind. We will pay for the medical evidence we request, if there is a charge. We will also be responsible for the cost of medical evidence we ask you to get.
Editorial Note on Part 416
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 416 appear at 68 FR 53509, Sept. 11, 2003.

§ 416.2101 Introduction. ( a ) *What is in this subpart.* This subpart describes the agreements we make with States under which we determine the Medicaid eligibility of individuals who receive Supplemental Security Income (SSI) benefits. It includes a general description of the services we will provide under these agreements and the costs to the States for the services.
( b ) *Related regulations.* The comprehensive regulations on eligibility for the Medicaid program, administered by the Health Care Financing Administration, are in part 435 of title 42 of the Code of Federal Regulations.
( c ) *Definitions.* In this subpart— *SSI benefits* means Federal SSI benefits, including special SSI cash benefits under section 1619(a) of the Social Security Act. In addition, we consider a person who has special SSI eligibility status under section 1619(b) of the Social Security Act to be receiving SSI benefits.
*State Medicaid Plan* means a State's medical assistance plan which the Secretary has approved under title XIX of the Act for Federal payment of a share of the State's medical assistance expenses.
*State supplementary payments* means supplementary payments we administer for a State under subpart T of this part.
We, us, or our refers to the Social Security Administration.
### §2686. Review of world-wide supply, demand, and price of basic raw and processed materials

It is the sense of the Congress that the Secretary of State should, and he is authorized to, establish within the Department of State a bureau which shall be responsible for continuously reviewing (1) the supply, demand, and price, throughout the world, of basic raw and processed materials (including agricultural commodities), and (2) the effect of United States Government programs and policies (including tax policy) in creating or alleviating, or assisting in creating or alleviating, shortages of such materials. In conducting such review, the bureau should obtain information with respect to—

(A) the supply, demand, and price of each such material in each major importing, exporting, and producing country and region of the world in order to understand long-term and short-term trends in the supply, demand, and price of such materials;

(B) projected imports and exports of such materials on a country-by-country basis;

(C) unusual patterns or changes in connection with the purchase or sale of such materials;

(D) a list of such materials in short supply and an estimate of the amount of shortage;

(E) international geological, geophysical, and political conditions which may affect the supply of such materials; and

(F) other matters that the Secretary considers appropriate in carrying out this section.

(Pub. L. 93–475, §14, Oct. 26, 1974, 88 Stat. 1443.)
April 2023

STORAGE COMPUTED* RELEASE - C.F.S.

 1000 ACRE - FEET INFLOW RIVER EVAPORATION PRECIP

DAY ELEV IN LAKE CHANGE C.F.S. POWER SPILL OUTLET C. F. S. INCHES INCHES

3,770.9

1 1,040.14 3,796.3 25.4 14,537 1,717 0 0 0 0.00 0.01

2 1,041.11 3,822.0 25.7 13,986 1,018 0 0 16 0.02 0.01

3 1,041.94 3,844.1 22.1 12,191 965 0 0 94 0.12 0.00

4 1,042.58 3,861.2 17.1 10,993 2,278 0 0 95 0.12 0.00

5 1,043.24 3,878.8 17.7 11,413 2,401 0 0 103 0.13 0.00

6 1,043.86 3,895.5 16.7 11,017 2,535 0 0 87 0.11 0.00

7 1,045.02 3,926.8 31.3 18,259 2,470 0 0 16 0.02 1.62

8 1,046.31 3,961.8 35.0 19,905 2,241 0 0 8 0.01 1.59

9 1,047.51 3,994.6 32.8 17,725 1,119 0 0 89 0.11 0.00

10 1,048.70 4,027.2 32.7 17,712 1,130 0 0 113 0.14 0.00

11 1,049.90 4,060.3 33.1 18,755 1,893 0 0 163 0.20 0.00

12 1,050.89 4,087.8 27.5 15,693 1,645 0 0 196 0.24 0.00

13 1,052.11 4,121.9 34.0 19,073 1,724 0 0 189 0.23 0.00

14 1,053.17 4,151.6 29.7 17,063 1,883 0 0 190 0.23 0.00

15 1,054.21 4,180.9 29.3 16,960 2,056 0 0 125 0.15 0.00

16 1,055.03 4,204.1 23.2 14,262 2,371 0 0 192 0.23 0.00

17 1,055.76 4,224.9 20.8 12,952 2,196 0 0 293 0.35 0.00

18 1,056.55 4,247.4 22.5 13,408 1,975 0 0 75 0.09 0.03

19 1,057.19 4,265.7 18.3 11,448 2,128 0 0 93 0.11 0.00

20 1,057.87 4,285.2 19.5 11,630 1,674 0 0 118 0.14 0.00

21 1,058.42 4,301.0 15.8 11,243 3,081 0 0 178 0.21 0.00

22 1,058.93 4,315.7 14.7 10,647 3,126 0 0 110 0.13 0.00

23 1,059.52 4,332.8 17.1 12,276 3,429 0 0 238 0.28 0.00

24 1,060.02 4,347.3 14.5 12,732 5,211 0 0 221 0.26 0.00

25 1,060.40 4,358.3 11.0 12,051 6,277 0 0 230 0.27 0.00

26 1,060.72 4,367.6 9.3 12,143 7,200 0 8 265 0.31 0.00

27 1,061.84 4,400.1 32.5 22,461 5,801 0 15 249 0.29 0.00

28 1,062.12 4,408.2 8.2 10,938 6,560 0 0 266 0.31 0.00

29 1,062.48 4,418.7 10.5 12,293 6,718 0 0 275 0.32 0.00

30 1,062.87 4,430.1 11.4 13,520 7,528 0 0 250 0.29 0.00

TOTALS 659.4 429,286 92,350 0 23 4,537 5.42 3.26

ACRE-FEET 659,400 851,489 183,176 0 46 8,999

Comments: * COMPUTED INFLOW IS THE SUM OF CHANGE IN STORAGE, RELEASES, PUMPING AND EVAPORATION

Release (ACRE-FEET)

Power 183,176 Outlet 46

Spill 0 Total 183,222

Precipitation

This month = 3.26

October 01, 2022 To date = 68.96

SUMMARY

Historical Archive and Report Database

Shasta Lake Daily Operations

Run Date: 5/31/2023
### §296a. Maintenance management of overseas property

The Director of the Office of Foreign Buildings Operations shall—

(1) direct overseas posts to make annual building condition assessments of buildings and facilities used by the post;

(2) not later than 90 days after October 28, 1991, revise the Foreign Affairs Manual to stipulate that the Buildings and Maintenance Handbook shall be used by each post to identify their maintenance needs, standardize their maintenance operations, and conduct annual assessments as required by paragraph (1);

(3) direct the Office of Foreign Buildings Operations to provide proper training and assistance to posts to ensure that annual surveys are effectively completed; and

(4) direct overseas posts to ensure that all maintenance program fiscal transactions are properly encoded in the Department of State accounting system to enable compilation of actual expenditures on routine maintenance and specific maintenance funded by the Office of Foreign Buildings Operations.

(Pub. L. 102–138, title I, §125, Oct. 28, 1991, 105 Stat. 659.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section was enacted as part of the Foreign Relations Authorization Act, Fiscal Years 1992 and 1993, and not as part of the Foreign Service Buildings Act, 1926, which comprises this chapter.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Authority of Secretary of State

Except as otherwise provided, Secretary of State to have and exercise any authority vested by law in any official or office of Department of State and references to such officials or offices deemed to refer to Secretary of State or Department of State, as appropriate, see section 2651a of this title and section 161(d) of Pub. L. 103–236, set out as a note under section 2651a of this title.
# C_2016468EN.01033301.xml

| 15.12.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 468/333 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

15.12.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 468/333

---

P7_TA(2013)0582

Amending certain Directives as regards the French outermost regions and Mayotte in particular *

European Parliament legislative resolution of 12 December 2013 on the proposal for a Council directive amending Directives 2006/112/EC and 2008/118/EC as regards the French outermost regions and Mayotte in particular (COM(2013)0577 — C7-0268/2013 — 2013/0280(CNS))

(Special legislative procedure — consultation)

(2016/C 468/77)

The European Parliament,

The European Parliament

| — | having regard to the Commission proposal to the Council (COM(2013)0577), |
| --- | --- |

—

having regard to the Commission proposal to the Council (COM(2013)0577),

| — | having regard to Article 113 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, pursuant to which the Council consulted Parliament (C7-0268/2013), |
| --- | --- |

—

having regard to Article 113 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, pursuant to which the Council consulted Parliament (C7-0268/2013),

| — | having regard to the opinion of the Committee on Legal Affairs on the proposed legal basis, |
| --- | --- |

—

having regard to the opinion of the Committee on Legal Affairs on the proposed legal basis,

| — | having regard to Rules 55, 46(1) and 37 of its Rules of Procedure, |
| --- | --- |

—

having regard to Rules 55, 46(1) and 37 of its Rules of Procedure,

| — | having regard to the report of the Committee on Economic and Monetary Affairs (A7-0405/2013), |
| --- | --- |

—

having regard to the report of the Committee on Economic and Monetary Affairs (A7-0405/2013),

| 1. | Approves the Commission proposal; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Approves the Commission proposal;

| 2. | Calls on the Council to notify Parliament if it intends to depart from the text approved by Parliament; |
| --- | --- |

2.

Calls on the Council to notify Parliament if it intends to depart from the text approved by Parliament;

| 3. | Asks the Council to consult Parliament again if it intends to substantially amend the text approved by Parliament; |
| --- | --- |

3.

Asks the Council to consult Parliament again if it intends to substantially amend the text approved by Parliament;

| 4. | Instructs its President to forward its position to the Council, the Commission and the national parliaments. |
| --- | --- |

4.

Instructs its President to forward its position to the Council, the Commission and the national parliaments.

---
#### Charles Schwartz, Respondent, v. The Madison, Incorporated, Appellant.

No opinion. Present — Martin, P. J., Townley, Dore, Cohn and Callahan, JJ.
<PAGE>   1

                                                                Exhibit 23(a)




                      CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS




The Board of Directors of 
Kemper Investors Life Insurance Company and
Contract Owners of KILICO Individual and Group Variable and Market Value
Adjusted Deferred Annuity Contracts



We consent to the inclusion in this registration statement on Form S-1 (File
No. 333-02491) of our report dated February 19, 1999, on our audit 
of the financial statements of KILICO Variable Annuity Separate Account
and to the reference to our firm under the caption "Experts".





                                                PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP





Chicago, Illinois                               
April 16, 1999



<PAGE>   2
                      CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS



The Board of Directors of
Kemper Investors Life Insurance Company and
Contract Owners of KILICO Individual and Group Variable and Market Value
Adjusted Deferred Annuity Contracts



We consent to the inclusion in this registration statement on Form S-1 (File
No. 333-02491) of our report dated March 12, 1999, on our audit of 
the consolidated financial statements of Kemper Investors Life
Insurance Company and to the reference to our firm under the caption "Experts".




                                                PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP




Chicago, Illinois
April 16, 1999
(No. 73-CC-334

#### Joe Damico, Claimant, *vs.*State of Illinois, Department of Transportation, Respondent.

*Opinion filed August 15, 1973.*

Joe Damico, Claimant, pro se.

William J. Scott, Attorney General; Edward L. S. Arkema, Jr., Assistant Attorney General, for Respondent.

Per Curiam.
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

December 10, 2015

No. 04-15-00660-CR

EX PARTE Matthew JACKSON

Original Habeas Corpus Proceeding1

ORDER

Sitting: Karen Angelini, Justice

Marialyn Barnard, Justice

Jason Pulliam, Justice

On October 23, 2015, relator filed a pro se petition for writ of habeas corpus, followed by 

a supplemental petition on October 30, 2015. The court has considered relator’s petitions and is 

of the opinion that relator is not entitled to the relief sought. Accordingly, relator’s original and 

supplemental petitions for writ of habeas corpus are DISMISSED FOR LACK OF 

JURISDICTION. The court’s opinion will issue at a later date.

It is so ORDERED on December 10, 2015.

_________________________________

Jason Pulliam, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said 

court on this 10th day of December, 2015.

___________________________________

Keith E. Hottle, Clerk

 

1 This proceeding arises out of Cause No. 2014CR0148, styled The State of Texas v. Matthew Jamal Jackson, 

pending in the 379th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas, the Honorable Ron Rangel presiding.
#### § 641.300 What is the State Plan?

The State Plan is a plan, submitted by the Governor, or the highest government official, in each State, as an independent document or as part of the WIOA Combined State Plan, that outlines a 4-year strategy for the statewide provision of community service employment and other authorized activities for eligible individuals under the SCSEP as described in § 641.302. The State Plan also describes the planning and implementation process for SCSEP services in the State, taking into account the relative distribution of eligible individuals and employment opportunities within the State. The State Plan is intended to foster coordination among the various SCSEP grantees and sub-recipients operating within the State and to facilitate the efforts of stakeholders, including State and local boards under WIOA, to work collaboratively through a participatory process to accomplish the SCSEP's goals. (OAA sec. 503(a)(1).) The State Plan provisions are listed in § 641.325.

[82 FR 56882, Dec. 1, 2017]
#### Mary A. Crayton, Respondent, v. George E. Larabee and Others, Appellants.

Judgment and order affirmed, with costs. Held, *first,*that the defendant’s motion for a nonsuit and dismissal of the complaint was properly denied; *second,*that the question of the power of the health officer to quarantine the plaintiff if he acted in good faith and had reasonable cause to believe that the plaintiff was infected and liable to communicate disease to others, was not raised at the trial by any exception to the charge or otherwise. All concurred, except Merrell, J., who dissented upon the ground that while the question referred to was not properly raised, this court has the power to, and should, pass upon that question.
Order filed July 30, 2019

In The 

## Fourteenth Court of Appeals

____________ NO. 14

- 19

- 00206

- CV

____________ LOLITA TOLIVER , Appellant

V.
556 LINDA VISTA, Appellee

On Appeal from the Co Civil Ct at Law No 4

Harris County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 1117243



### O R D E R
Appellant’ s brief was due July 22, 2019

. No brief or motion for extension of
time has been filed.
Unless appellant files a brief with this court on or before August 2 1 , 2019
, the court will dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.3(b).

PER CURIAM
U.S. GOVERNMENT PUBLISHING OFFICE

WASHINGTON : 

1 

49–012 2015

113th Congress, 2d Session – – – – – – – – – – – – House Document, 113–177 

DESIGNATION OF FUNDING AS AN EMERGENCY 

REQUIREMENT 

COMMUNICATION 

FROM

THE PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES 

TRANSMITTING

DESIGNATION AS EMERGENCY REQUIREMENTS ALL FUNDING SO 

DESIGNATED BY THE CONGRESS, PURSUANT TO SECTION 6 OF 

THE CONSOLIDATED AND FURTHER CONTINUING APPROPRIATIONS ACT, 2015 

JANUARY 2, 2015.—Referred to the Committee on Appropriations and 

ordered to be printed 


tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with HOUSE DOCE:\Seals\Congress.#13

tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with HOUSE DOC
(1) 

THE WHITE HOUSE, 

Washington, December 16, 2014. 

Hon. JOHN BOEHNER, 

Speaker of the House of Representatives, 

Washington, DC. 

DEAR MR. SPEAKER: In accordance with section 6 of the Consolidated and Further Continuing Appropriations Act, 2015 (the ‘‘Act’’), 

I hereby designate as emergency requirements all funding so designated by the Congress in the Act pursuant to section 251(b)(2)(A) 

of the Balanced Budget and Emergency Deficit Control Act of 1985, 

as amended, as outlined in the enclosed list of accounts. 

The details of this action are set forth in the enclosed memorandum from the Director of the Office of Management and Budget. 

Sincerely, 

BARACK OBAMA. 


tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with HOUSE DOC
2 


tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with HOUSE DOCInsert offset folio 3 here HDOC177.001
3 


tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with HOUSE DOCInsert offset folio 4 here HDOC177.002
# C_2016055EN.01014402.xml

| 12.2.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 55/144 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

12.2.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 55/144

---

P7_TA(2013)0211

EU-Canada Agreement on customs cooperation with respect to matters related to supply chain security ***

European Parliament legislative resolution of 22 May 2013 on the draft Council decision on the conclusion of the Agreement between the European Union and Canada on customs cooperation with respect to matters related to supply-chain security (11362/2012 — C7- 0078/2013 — 2012/0073(NLE))

(Consent)

(2016/C 055/35)

The European Parliament,

The European Parliament

| — | having regard to the draft Council decision (11362/2012), |
| --- | --- |

—

having regard to the draft Council decision (11362/2012),

| — | having regard to the draft Agreement between the European Union and Canada on customs cooperation with respect to matters related to supply-chain security (11587/2012), |
| --- | --- |

—

having regard to the draft Agreement between the European Union and Canada on customs cooperation with respect to matters related to supply-chain security (11587/2012),

| — | having regard to the request for consent submitted by the Council in accordance with Article 207(4), first subparagraph and Article 218(6), second subparagraph, point (a), of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (C7-0078/2013), |
| --- | --- |

—

having regard to the request for consent submitted by the Council in accordance with Article 207(4), first subparagraph and Article 218(6), second subparagraph, point (a), of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (C7-0078/2013),

| — | having regard to Rules 81 and 90(7) of its Rules of Procedure, |
| --- | --- |

—

having regard to Rules 81 and 90(7) of its Rules of Procedure,

| — | having regard to the recommendation of the Committee on International Trade (A7-0152/2013), |
| --- | --- |

—

having regard to the recommendation of the Committee on International Trade (A7-0152/2013),

| 1. | Consents to conclusion of the Agreement; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Consents to conclusion of the Agreement;

| 2. | Instructs its President to forward its position to the Council, the Commission and the governments and parliaments of the Member States and of Canada. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Instructs its President to forward its position to the Council, the Commission and the governments and parliaments of the Member States and of Canada.

---