alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 422.440 What are your employer's responsibilities under an administrative wage garnishment order? ( a ) *When withholding must begin.* Your employer must withhold the appropriate amount from your disposable pay on each payday beginning on the first payday after receiving the garnishment order issued under this section. If the first payday is within 10 days after your employer receives the order, then your employer must begin withholding on the first or second payday after your employer receives the order. Withholding must continue until we notify your employer to stop withholding.
( b ) *Payment of amounts withheld.* Your employer must promptly pay to us all amounts withheld under this section.
( c ) *Other assignments or allotments of pay.* Your employer cannot honor an assignment or allotment of your pay to the extent that it would interfere with or prevent withholding under this section, unless the assignment or allotment is made under a family support judgement or order.
( d ) *Effect of withholding on employer pay and disbursement cycles.* Your employer will not be required to vary its normal pay and disbursement cycles in order to comply with the garnishment order.
( e ) *When withholding ends.* When we have fully recovered the amounts you owe, including interest, penalties, and administrative costs that we charge you as allowed by law, we will tell your employer to stop withholding from your disposable pay. As an added precaution, we will review our debtors' accounts at least annually to ensure that withholding has been terminated for accounts paid in full.
( f ) *Certain actions by an employer against you are prohibited.* Federal law prohibits an employer from using a garnishment order issued under this section as the basis for discharging you from employment, refusing to employ you, or taking disciplinary action against you. If your employer violates this prohibition, you may file a civil action against your employer in a Federal or State court of competent jurisdiction.
#### § 408.402 When do you need to give us evidence?

When you apply for SVB, we will ask you for any evidence we need to make sure that you meet the SVB qualification and entitlement requirements. After you begin receiving SVB, we may ask you for evidence showing whether your SVB payments should be reduced or stopped. We will help you get any documents you need but do not have. If your evidence is a foreign-language record or document, we can have it translated for you. The evidence you give us will be kept confidential and not disclosed to anyone but you except under the rules set out in part 401 of this chapter. You should also be aware that section 811 of the Act provides criminal penalties for misrepresenting the facts or for making false statements to obtain SVB payments for yourself or someone else, or to continue entitlement to benefits.
**Exhibit 31.1****Certification Pursuant to Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14 under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended**  I, Mark R. Holden, President and Chief Executive Officer ofAmerican Barge Line Company (the“Company”), certify that: 1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of AmericanBarge Line Company;  2. Based on my knowledge, this annual report does not contain any untrue statement of amaterial fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, inlight of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading withrespect to the period covered by this annual report;  3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial informationincluded in this annual report, fairly present in all material respects the financialcondition, results of operations and cash flows of the Company as of, and for, the periodspresented in this annual report;  4. The Company’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e)and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange ActRules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the Company and have: (a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused suchdisclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensurethat material information relating to the Company, including its consolidatedsubsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularlyduring the period in which this annual report is being prepared;  (b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the Company’s disclosure controls andprocedures and presented in this annual report our conclusions about theeffectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of theperiod covered by this annual report based on such evaluation; and  (c) Disclosed in this annual report any change in the Company’s internalcontrol over financial reporting that occurred during the Company’s fourth quarterof fiscal 2005 that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materiallyaffect, the Company’s internal control over financial reporting; and 5. The Company’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our mostrecent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the Company’sindependent registered public accounting firm and the Audit Committee of the Company’sBoard of Directors: (a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design oroperation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likelyto adversely affect the Company’s ability to record, process, summarize and reportfinancial information; and  (b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or otheremployees who have a significant role in the Company’s internal control overfinancial reporting.March 27, 2006         By:                                                       /s/ Mark R. Holden    Mark R. Holden    President and Chief Executive Officer
#### § 411.425 What should a State VR agency do if it gets an attempted referral from an EN and no agreement has been established between the EN and the State VR agency?

The State VR agency should contact the EN to discuss the need to establish an agreement. If the State VR agency and the EN are not able to negotiate acceptable terms for an agreement, the State VR agency should notify the PM that an attempted referral has been made without an agreement.
MARK ALLEN BIR

,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA

,

Appellee

. IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO

FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND

DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED

CASE NO. 1D 14

- 3593

_________ ____________________/

Opinion filed January 21, 2015.

An appeal from the Circuit Court for Okaloosa County

. John T. Brown , Judge

.

Mark Allen Bir , pro se, Appellant.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, and Virginia Harris, Assistant Attorney

General, Tal lahassee , for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.

WOLF, THOMAS, and WETHERELL, JJ., CONCUR.
Exhibit 99-b


April 2, 2003

BellSouth Corporation
Board of Directors

Dear Directors:

We are providing this letter to you for inclusion as an exhibit to your Form
10-Q filing pursuant to Item 601 of Regulation S-K.

We have been provided a copy of the Company's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for
the period ended March 31, 2003. Note D therein describes a change in accounting
principle from the publication and delivery method to the deferral method, which
will recognize print advertising and published revenues and related directory
costs ratably over the expected life of the directory. It should be understood
that the preferability of one acceptable method of accounting over another for
recognizing revenues and expenses related to the directory publishing business
has not been addressed in any authoritative accounting literature, and in
expressing our concurrence below we have relied on management's determination
that this change in accounting principle is preferable. Based on our reading of
management's stated reasons and justification for this change in accounting
principle in the Form 10-Q, and our discussions with management as to their
judgment about the relevant business planning factors relating to the change, we
concur with management that such change represents, in the Company's
circumstances, the adoption of a preferable accounting principle in conformity
with Accounting Principle Board Opinion No. 20.

We have not audited any financial statements of the Company as of any date or
for any period subsequent to December 31, 2002. Accordingly, our comments are
subject to change upon completion of an audit of the financial statements
covering the period of the accounting change.

Very truly yours,

/s/ Pricewaterhouse Coopers LLP

PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5



       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1998

<PERIOD-END>                                   JUN-30-1998

<CASH>                                         1,216
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  87,344
<ALLOWANCES>                                   0
<INVENTORY>                                    162,000
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               250,560
<PP&E>                                         29,106
<DEPRECIATION>                                 0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 279,666
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          1,690,365
<BONDS>                                        0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       15,030
<OTHER-SE>                                     (1,425,629)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   (1,410,699)
<SALES>                                        122,834
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               122,834
<CGS>                                          111,003
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  241,515
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               129,594
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             5,886
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (229,684)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (229,684)
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                (125,399)
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (359,278)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  (0.02)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  (0.02)
        








</TABLE>
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

DAY ELEV

 919.36

 919.45

 919.53

 919.63

 919.90

 920.44

 920.94

 921.37

 921.68

 921.81

 922.19

 922.45

 923.38

 924.23

 926.19

 927.67

 929.02

 930.05

 930.81

 931.60

 932.24

 934.82

 941.35

 946.62

 949.22

 951.45

 953.35

 954.99

 1,416.0

 1,417.2

 1,418.3

 1,419.7

 1,423.4

 1,430.8

 1,437.7

 1,443.6

 1,447.9

 1,449.7

 1,455.0

 1,458.6

 1,471.6

 1,483.5

 1,511.2

 1,532.4

 1,552.0

 1,567.0

 1,578.1

 1,589.8

 1,599.2

 1,637.8

 1,738.3

 1,821.9

 1,864.2

 1,901.0

 1,932.8

 1,960.5

STORAGE

-0.1

+1.2

+1.1

+1.4

+3.7

+7.4

+6.9

+5.9

+4.3

+1.8

+5.3

+3.6

+13.0

+11.9

+27.8

+21.2

+19.5

+15.0

+11.1

+11.6

+9.5

+38.6

+100.4

+83.6

+42.3

+36.8

+31.8

+27.7

CHANGE

 3,177

 3,874

 3,620

 3,786

 4,978

 6,547

 5,879

 5,628

 5,467

 4,329

 5,655

 4,910

 8,408

 8,584

 15,180

 12,632

 11,754

 9,580

 8,155

 7,301

 6,921

 21,292

 51,575

 42,953

 22,081

 19,048

 16,538

 14,623

INFLOW

 3,206

 3,184

 3,027

 3,075

 3,093

 2,718

 2,407

 2,586

 3,279

 3,394

 2,995

 2,950

 1,864

 2,531

 1,181

 1,894

 1,867

 2,007

 2,493

 1,414

 2,107

 1,806

 908

 620

 734

 484

 486

 607

POWER

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

SPILL

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 132

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

OUTLET

 40

 68

 40

 20

 20

 93

 12

 49

 29

 29

 4

 4

 4

 41

 4

 47

 51

 4

 43

 17

 39

 31

 32

 162

 29

 5

 40

 50

C.F.S.

 .10

 .17

 .10

 .05

 .05

 .23

 .03

 .12

 .07

 .07

 .01

 .01

 .01

 .10

 .01

 .11

 .12

 .01

 .10

 .04

 .09

 .07

 .07

 .34

 .06

 .01

 .08

 .10

INCHES

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 1.05

 .07

 .00

 .17

 .01

 .55

 1.58

 1.62

 1.30

 2.75

 2.45

 1.20

 .55

 .03

 .00

 .00

 1.75

 1.75

 2.55

 .10

 .24

 .00

 .00

PRECIP

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

FEBRUARY 2009 SHASTA LAKE DAILY OPERATIONS RUN DATE: March 1, 2009

IN LAKE

EVAPORATION

INCHES

C.F.S.

COMPUTED*

1000 ACRE-FEET

RELEASE - C.F.S.

RIVER

TOTALS +544.3 334,475 58,917 0 132 1,007 2.33 19.72

ACRE-FEET +544,300 663,431 116,862 0 262 1,997

COMMENTS:

* COMPUTED INFLOW IS THE SUM OF CHANGE IN STORAGE, RELEASES AND EVAPORATION.

SUMMARY

RELEASE (ACRE-FEET)

POWER 116,862

SPILL 0

OUTLET

TOTAL

 262

 117,124

PRECIPITATION

THIS MONTH =

TO DATE =

 19.72

JULY 1, 2008 31.78

 1,416.1
### §2679. Maximum rates of per diem in lieu of subsistence payable to foreign participants in exchange of persons program or in program of furnishing technical information and assistance

The Secretary of State, with the approval of the Office of Management and Budget, shall prescribe the maximum rates of per diem in lieu of subsistence (or of similar allowances therefor) payable while away from their own countries to foreign participants in any exchange of persons program, or in any program of furnishing technical information and assistance, under the jurisdiction of any Government agency, and said rates may be fixed without regard to any provision of law in limitation thereof.

(Aug. 1, 1956, ch. 841, title I, §12, 70 Stat. 892; 1970 Reorg. Plan No. 2, §102, eff. July 1, 1970, 35 F.R. 7959, 84 Stat. 2085; renumbered title I, Pub. L. 97–241, title II, §202(a), Aug. 24, 1982, 96 Stat. 282.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section was formerly classified to section 170q of Title 5 prior to the general revision and enactment of Title 5, Government Organization and Employees, by Pub. L. 89–554, §1, Sept. 6, 1966, 80 Stat. 378.

#### **Executive Documents**

#### Transfer of Functions

Functions vested by law (including reorganization plan) in Bureau of the Budget or Director of Bureau of the Budget transferred to President by section 101 of Reorg. Plan No. 2 of 1970, eff. July 1, 1970, 35 F.R. 7959, 84 Stat. 2085. Section 102 of Reorg. Plan No. 2 of 1970 redesignated Bureau of the Budget as Office of Management and Budget and offices of Director, Deputy Director, and Assistant Directors of Bureau of the Budget as Director, Deputy Director, and Assistant Directors, respectively, of Office of Management and Budget. Section 103 of Reorg. Plan No. 2 of 1970 transferred all records, property, personnel, and funds of Bureau to Office of Management and Budget. See Part I of Reorganization Plan No. 2 of 1970, set out in the Appendix to Title 5, Government Organization and Employees.

#### Delegation of Functions

Authority of Secretary of State under this section to prescribe certain maximum rates of per diem in lieu of subsistence (or of similar allowances therefor), without the approval, ratification, or other action of President, delegated to Secretary of State, see section 4 of Ex. Ord. No. 11609, July 22, 1971, 36 F.R. 13747, set out as a note under section 301 of Title 3, The President.
#### § 226.16 Supplemental annuity.

A supplemental annuity is payable in addition to tiers I and II and the vested dual benefit to an employee who meets the requirements of § 216.41 of this chapter. The supplemental annuity is equal to $23 plus $4 for each full year of service, over 25 years of service, up to a maximum of $43. The supplemental annuity may be reduced by the railroad retirement family maximum as shown in §§ 226.50-226.52 of this part, or for the receipt of a private pension benefit as explained in part 227 of this chapter.
_________________________________________ 

 

 

 

Order Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan 

April 11, 2007 Clifford W. Taylor,

 Chief Justice 

131618 & (38) (39) Michael F. Cavanagh 

Elizabeth A. Weaver 

Marilyn Kelly 

Maura D. Corrigan 

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff-Appellee, 

Robert P. Young, Jr. 

Stephen J. Markman,

 Justices 

v SC: 131618 

 COA: 266840 

Oakland CC: 2001-180525-FH 

WILLIAM SIM SPENCER,

Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/ 

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the June 22, 2006 order 

of the Court of Appeals is considered and, pursuant to MCR 7.302(G)(1), in lieu of 

granting leave to appeal, we VACATE the sentence of the Oakland Circuit Court, and we 

REMAND this case to the trial court for resentencing. Because the defendant’s seconddegree criminal sexual conduct convictions did not involve sexual penetration, the 

defendant was improperly assessed 50 points for Offense Variable 13. The correct score 

for Offense Variable 13 was 25 points. On remand, the trial court shall correct the score 

on Offense Variable 13 and resentence the defendant within the appropriate statutory 

sentencing guidelines range, pursuant to the evaluation under People v Cobbs, 443 Mich 

276 (1993), or permit the defendant to withdraw his plea. In all other respects, leave to 

appeal is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the remaining questions presented 

should be reviewed by this Court. The motion for stay and motion for miscellaneous 

relief are DENIED as moot. 

We do not retain jurisdiction. 

s0404 

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

April 11, 2007 

 Clerk
Third District Court of Appeal

State of Florida 

Opinion filed January 12, 2022.

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.

________________

No. 3D21-0600

Lower Tribunal Nos. AHCA 20-FH2635 & OP2047580263

________________

M.M.,

Appellant,

vs.

Agency for Health Care Administration, et al.,

Appellees.

An Appeal from the State of Florida Agency for Health Care 

Administration, Office of Fair Hearings.

Lopez Legal, P.A., and Alejandra Arroyave Lopez, for appellant.

Eugenia Keough Rains, Assistant General Counsel (Tallahassee); 

Hogan Lovells US LLP, and Craig H. Smith, for appellees.

Before SCALES, MILLER and GORDO, JJ. 

PER CURIAM.
2

M.M. appeals a final order entered by a hearing officer from the State 

of Florida Agency for Health Care Administration that approved the 

termination of forty hours per week of adult companion services provided to 

M.M. as a Medicaid benefit for the month of October 2020. We are not free 

to substitute our judgment for that of a hearing officer, nor may we reweigh 

the evidence presented at the administrative hearing. § 120.68(7)(b), (10), 

Fla. Stat. (2020); Bagarotti v. Reemployment Assistance Appeals Comm’n, 

208 So. 3d 1197, 1199 (Fla. 3d DCA 2017). Our review is limited to whether 

the hearing officer’s findings are supported by competent, substantial 

evidence. Id. In this case, they are. We are therefore compelled to affirm. 

Affirmed.
§ 255.17 Recovery of overpayments from a representative payee. ( a ) *Joint liability.* In general, if an overpayment is made to an individual receiving benefits as a representative payee (see part 266 of this chapter) the Board may recover the overpayment from either the representative payee or the beneficiary, or both. If the beneficiary is currently receiving benefits, either in his or her own right or through a representative payee, the Board will generally propose to recover the overpayment by setoff against those benefits as provided for in § 255.6 of this part. If the beneficiary is not currently receiving benefits but the representative payee is receiving benefits, then the Board will generally propose to recover the overpayment by setoff against those benefits.
( b ) *Waiver of overpayments.* For purposes of § 255.10 of this part (Waiver of recovery), if it is determined that the representative payee was at fault in causing the overpayment there may be no waiver of the overpayment either as to the representative payee or the beneficiary. However, if the beneficiary was not at fault in causing the overpayment he or she may be eligible for administrative relief from recovery under § 255.16 of this part.
( c ) This section may be illustrated by the following examples:
Example (1). M is receiving a child's annuity as a representative payee for her disabled son, S. With M's knowledge S marries. Although both M and S know that marriage terminates the child's annuity, neither of them informs the Board of this event. Both M and S are liable for any overpayment caused. Waiver is not available since M would be considered at fault in causing the overpayment. Administrative relief from recovery is not available to S since he would also be considered at fault.
Example (2). R is a representative payee for B, who resides in a skilled-care facility. R is found to be at fault in causing an overpayment of benefits to B. The Board may recover the overpayment from either R or B. Waiver is not available because R was at fault in causing the overpayment. However, if B was not at fault in causing the overpayment he or she may be entitled to administrative relief from recovery under § 255.16 of this part.