alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

DAY ELEV

 1,019.03

 1,018.64

 1,018.25

 1,017.88

 1,017.54

 1,017.22

 1,016.92

 1,016.60

 1,016.33

 1,015.97

 1,015.63

 1,015.36

 1,015.09

 1,014.79

 1,014.46

 1,014.17

 1,013.92

 1,013.60

 1,013.35

 1,013.09

 1,012.81

 1,012.46

 1,012.03

 1,011.56

 1,011.14

 1,010.72

 1,010.42

 1,010.04

 1,009.65

 1,009.26

 3,263.6

 3,254.2

 3,244.9

 3,236.1

 3,228.0

 3,220.3

 3,213.2

 3,205.6

 3,199.2

 3,190.7

 3,182.7

 3,176.3

 3,169.9

 3,162.9

 3,155.2

 3,148.4

 3,142.5

 3,135.0

 3,129.2

 3,123.1

 3,116.6

 3,108.5

 3,098.5

 3,087.7

 3,078.0

 3,068.3

 3,061.4

 3,052.7

 3,043.8

 3,034.8

STORAGE

-8.2

-9.3

-9.3

-8.8

-8.1

-7.6

-7.1

-7.6

-6.4

-8.5

-8.0

-6.4

-6.4

-7.0

-7.7

-6.8

-5.9

-7.5

-5.8

-6.1

-6.5

-8.1

-10.0

-10.9

-9.7

-9.7

-6.9

-8.7

-8.9

-8.9

CHANGE

 3,535

 3,429

 3,436

 3,119

 3,124

 3,310

 3,491

 3,388

 3,982

 3,013

 2,753

 3,966

 3,973

 3,555

 3,657

 3,237

 3,509

 2,804

 3,591

 3,410

 3,509

 3,469

 3,026

 3,044

 3,466

 3,331

 4,096

 3,333

 3,292

 3,496

INFLOW

 7,400

 7,913

 7,897

 7,375

 7,012

 6,950

 6,901

 7,016

 6,978

 7,180

 6,691

 7,010

 6,850

 7,039

 6,891

 6,542

 6,302

 6,493

 6,333

 6,284

 6,593

 7,258

 7,957

 8,335

 8,315

 8,028

 7,395

 7,599

 7,586

 7,856

POWER

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

SPILL

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 146

 0

 461

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

OUTLET

 261

 225

 246

 203

 196

 203

 188

 195

 230

 132

 104

 166

 187

 69

 207

 124

 158

 76

 199

 185

 198

 307

 102

 183

 41

 176

 176

 135

 202

 134

C.F.S.

 .37

 .32

 .35

 .29

 .28

 .29

 .27

 .28

 .33

 .19

 .15

 .24

 .27

 .10

 .30

 .18

 .23

 .11

 .29

 .27

 .29

 .45

 .15

 .27

 .06

 .26

 .26

 .20

 .30

 .20

INCHES

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .01

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

PRECIP

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

SEPTEMBER 2005 SHASTA LAKE DAILY OPERATIONS RUN DATE: March 14, 2006

IN LAKE

EVAPORATION

INCHES

C.F.S.

COMPUTED*

1000 ACRE-FEET

RELEASE - C.F.S.

RIVER

TOTALS -236.8 102,344 215,979 0 607 5,208 7.55 .01

ACRE-FEET -236,800 202,999 428,394 0 1,204 10,330

COMMENTS:

* COMPUTED INFLOW IS THE SUM OF CHANGE IN STORAGE, RELEASES AND EVAPORATION.

SUMMARY

RELEASE (ACRE-FEET)

POWER 428,394

SPILL 0

OUTLET

TOTAL

 1,204

 429,598

PRECIPITATION

THIS MONTH =

TO DATE =

 .01

JULY 1, 2005 .01

 3,271.8

Table 3
================================================================================

================================================================================
<TABLE>

                                                                                                               EXHIBIT 12
                                               PACIFIC TELESIS GROUP
                                 COMPUTATION OF RATIOS OF EARNINGS TO FIXED CHARGES
                                                Dollars in Millions



                                                 SIX MONTHS ENDED
                                                     JUNE 30,                      YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31,
<CAPTION>
                                              ---------------------  -----------------------------------------------------
                                                1997        1996        1996        1995      1994       1993       1992
                                             ---------   ---------  ------------------------------------------------------
<S>                                           <C>        <C>          <C>         <C>        <C>        <C>         <C>
Income (Loss) From Continuing Operations Before
   Income Taxes and Cumulative Effect of
   Accounting Changes*                        $(1,056)   $ 1,052     $  1,798    $  1,611   $ 1,793    $   201    $  1,782
     Add:  Interest Expense                       209        229          455         442       455        509         506
          Dividends on Preferred Securities        40         19           60           -         -          -          -    
          1/3 Rental Expense                       36         25           51          31        43         40          44
                                              ---------   --------   ---------   ---------  --------   --------  ----------

     Adjusted Earnings                        $  (771)    $1,325     $  2,364    $  2,084   $ 2,291    $   750    $  2,332
                                              =========   ========   =========   =========  ========   ========  ==========

Total Interest Charges                        $  272      $  229     $    455    $    442   $   455    $   509    $    510
Dividends on Preferred Securities                 40          19           60           -         -          -          -
1/3 Rental Expense                                36          25           51          31        43         40          44
                                              ---------   --------   ---------   ---------  --------   --------  ----------

     Adjusted Fixed Charges                   $  348      $  273     $    566    $    473   $   498    $   549    $    554
                                              =========   ========   =========   =========  ========   ========  =========

Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges              (2.22)       4.85        4.18        4.41      4.60       1.37       4.21
<FN>

*Excluding undistributed earnings on investments accounted for under the equity method.
</FN>
</TABLE>
### §1631b. Cancellation and issuance of shares of stock or other beneficial interest in corporation

Whenever shares of stock or other beneficial interest in any corporation, association, or company or trust are vested in any officer or agency designated by the President under this subchapter, it shall be the duty of the corporation, association, or company or trustee or trustees issuing such shares or any certificates or other instruments representing the same or any other beneficial interest to cancel such shares of stock or other beneficial interest upon its, his, or their books and in lieu thereof to issue certificates or other instruments for such shares or other beneficial interest to the designee of the President, or otherwise as such designee shall require.

(Mar. 10, 1950, ch. 54, title II, §203, as added Aug. 9, 1955, ch. 645, §3, 69 Stat. 563.)
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY ELEV

 1,039.07

 1,038.49

 1,037.93

 1,037.40

 1,036.79

 1,036.17

 1,035.60

 1,035.03

 1,034.42

 1,033.82

 1,033.25

 1,032.68

 1,032.13

 1,031.60

 1,031.09

 1,030.59

 1,030.08

 1,029.52

 1,029.00

 1,028.49

 1,027.95

 1,027.42

 1,026.93

 1,026.45

 1,026.08

 1,025.52

 1,025.11

 1,024.76

 1,024.46

 1,024.16

 1,023.74

 3,768.0

 3,752.7

 3,737.9

 3,724.0

 3,708.0

 3,691.9

 3,677.0

 3,662.2

 3,646.5

 3,631.0

 3,616.3

 3,601.7

 3,587.6

 3,574.1

 3,561.1

 3,548.4

 3,535.5

 3,521.4

 3,508.3

 3,495.5

 3,481.9

 3,468.7

 3,456.5

 3,444.5

 3,435.4

 3,421.5

 3,411.4

 3,402.8

 3,395.4

 3,388.0

 3,377.7

STORAGE

-16.2

-15.3

-14.8

-13.9

-16.0

-16.2

-14.8

-14.8

-15.8

-15.5

-14.7

-14.6

-14.1

-13.5

-13.0

-12.7

-12.9

-14.1

-13.1

-12.8

-13.5

-13.2

-12.2

-11.9

-9.2

-13.9

-10.1

-8.6

-7.4

-7.4

-10.3

CHANGE

 4,567

 4,702

 4,697

 4,502

 3,899

 4,529

 4,161

 4,461

 4,480

 3,947

 4,464

 4,378

 4,296

 4,064

 4,226

 4,240

 3,891

 3,975

 4,160

 4,345

 4,099

 4,027

 4,223

 3,829

 4,346

 1,690

 3,547

 4,622

 4,297

 4,560

 3,513

INFLOW

 12,427

 12,136

 11,902

 11,233

 11,690

 12,451

 11,338

 11,895

 12,196

 11,527

 11,591

 11,515

 11,070

 10,577

 10,535

 10,417

 10,139

 10,862

 10,555

 10,538

 10,684

 10,647

 10,136

 9,577

 8,776

 8,433

 8,438

 8,692

 7,764

 8,041

 8,444

POWER

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

SPILL

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

OUTLET

 287

 278

 231

 277

 261

 237

 298

 30

 235

 227

 264

 233

 323

 300

 239

 216

 268

 237

 215

 258

 243

 51

 249

 263

 204

 240

 218

 276

 253

 239

 260

C.F.S.

 .37

 .36

 .30

 .36

 .34

 .31

 .39

 .04

 .31

 .30

 .35

 .31

 .43

 .40

 .32

 .29

 .36

 .32

 .29

 .35

 .33

 .07

 .34

 .36

 .28

 .33

 .30

 .38

 .35

 .33

 .36

INCHES

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

PRECIP

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

AUGUST 2006 SHASTA LAKE DAILY OPERATIONS RUN DATE: December 19, 2006

IN LAKE

EVAPORATION

INCHES

C.F.S.

COMPUTED*

1000 ACRE-FEET

RELEASE - C.F.S.

RIVER

TOTALS -406.5 128,737 326,226 0 0 7,410 9.93 .00

ACRE-FEET -406,500 255,350 647,069 0 0 14,698

COMMENTS:

* COMPUTED INFLOW IS THE SUM OF CHANGE IN STORAGE, RELEASES AND EVAPORATION.

SUMMARY

RELEASE (ACRE-FEET)

POWER 647,069

SPILL 0

OUTLET

TOTAL

 0

 647,069

PRECIPITATION

THIS MONTH =

TO DATE =

 .00

JULY 1, 2006 .00

 3,784.1

Table 3
COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE

FIRST DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT HOUSTON

ORDER

Appellate case name: In re Joseph Campitelli

Appellate case number: 01-18-01096-CV

Trial court case number: 18-DCV-252182

Trial court: 505th District Court of Fort Bend County

Relator, Joseph Campitelli, has filed a petition for a writ of mandamus and a motion 

to stay the “January 16, 2019 trial setting in the underlying suit.” The motion is granted. 

The January 16, 2019 trial setting in Case No. 18-DCV-252182, in the 505th District Court 

of Fort Bend County, Texas is stayed. The stay is effective until disposition of relator’s 

petition for a writ of mandamus or further order of this Court.

It is so ORDERED.

Judge’s signature: /s/ Russell Lloyd

 Acting individually Acting for the Court

Date: __January 3, 2019__
Editorial Note on Part 606
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 606 appear at 71 FR 35513, June 21, 2006.

§ 606.20 Cap on tax credit reduction. ( a ) *Applicability.* Subsection (f) of section 3302 of FUTA authorizes a limitation (cap) on the reduction of tax credits by reason of an outstanding balance of advances, if the OWS Administrator determines with respect to a State, on or before November 10 of a taxable year, that— ( 1 ) No action was taken by the State during the 12-month period ending on September 30 of such taxable year which has resulted, or will result, in a reduction in the State's unemployment tax effort, as defined in § 606.21(a);
( 2 ) No action was taken by the State during the 12-month period ending on September 30 of such taxable year which has resulted, or will result, in a net decrease in the solvency of the State unemployment compensation system, as defined in § 606.21(b);
( 3 ) The State unemployment tax rate (as defined in § 606.3) for the taxable year equals or exceeds the average benefit-cost ratio (as defined in § 606.3) for the calendar years in the five-calendar year period ending with the calendar year immediately preceding the taxable year for which the cap is requested, under the rules specified in § 606.21 (c) and (d); and
( 4 ) The outstanding balance of advances to the State on September 30 of the taxable year was not greater than the outstanding balance of advances to the State on September 30 of the third preceding taxable year.
( b ) *Maximum tax credit reduction.* If a State qualifies for a cap, the maximum tax credit reduction for the taxable year shall not exceed 0.6 percent, or, if higher, the tax credit reduction that was in effect for the taxable year preceding the taxable year for which the cap is requested.
( c ) *Year not taken into account.* If a State qualifies for a cap for any year, the year and January 1 of the year to which the cap applies will not be taken into account for purposes of determining reduction of tax credit for subsequent taxable years.
( d ) *Partial caps.* Partial caps obtained under subsection (f)(8) are no longer available. Nevertheless, for the purposes of applying section 3302(c)(2) to subsequent taxable years, partial cap credits earned will be taken into account for purposes of determining reduction of tax credits. Also, the taxable year to which the partial cap applied (and January 1 thereof) will be taken into account for purposes of determining reduction of tax credits for subsequent taxable years.
[53 FR 37429, Sept. 26, 1988, as amended at 75 FR 57156, Sept. 17, 2010]
#### Western New York Institute for Deaf Mutes, Plaintiff, v. County of Broome, Defendant.

Judgment ordered in favor of the plaintiff upon the submission for the sum of $553.34, with interest thereon from the 14th day of March, 1908, with costs of the submission. All concurred.
**Exhibit32.1**

**Certificationof CEO Pursuant to18 U.S.C. Section 1350,as Adopted Pursuant toSection 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**

In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K ofKapStone Paper and Packaging Corporation for the year ended December 31,2006 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “Report”), I,Roger Stone, Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of KapStone Paper andPackaging Corporation, hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,that:

(1)                                  TheReport fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)                                  Theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operations of KapStone Paper andPackaging Corporation.

| Dated: March 13, 2007 |   |                                 |
|----------------------------|--------|--------------------------------------|
|                       | By:    | /s/ Roger Stone                      |
|                       |   | Roger Stone                          |
|                       |   | Chairman and Chief Executive Officer |

 

----
### SUBCHAPTER IX—GENERAL PROVISIONS
### §3306. Services to United States citizens on Taiwan

#### (a) Authorized services

The Institute may authorize any of its employees on Taiwan—

(1) to administer to or take from any person an oath, affirmation, affidavit, or deposition, and to perform any notarial act which any notary public is required or authorized by law to perform within the United States;

(2) To 1 act as provisional conservator of the personal estates of deceased United States citizens; and

(3) to assist and protect the interests of United States persons by performing other acts such as are authorized to be performed outside the United States for consular purposes by such laws of the United States as the President may specify.

#### (b) Acts by authorized employees

Acts performed by authorized employees of the Institute under this section shall be valid, and of like force and effect within the United States, as if performed by any other person authorized under the laws of the United States to perform such acts.

(Pub. L. 96–8, §7, Apr. 10, 1979, 93 Stat. 17.)

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date

Section effective as of January 1, 1979, see section 18 of Pub. L. 96–8, set out as a note under section 3301 of this title.

1 So in original. Probably should not be capitalized.
EXHIBIT 32.2



             CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER
                  PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

                        AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
            SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



     In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10Q of First
Keystone Corporation (the "Corporation") for the period ended June
30, 2006, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the
"Report"), I, Diane C.A. Rosler, Principal Financial Officer,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as added by Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:

    1.  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
        13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

    2.  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
        all material respects, the financial condition and results
        of operations of the Corporation as of and for the period
        covered by the Report.



                                  /s/ Diane C.A. Rosler
                                  Diane C.A. Rosler
                                  Principal Financial Officer


August 7, 2006


                                28
CENTRAL VALLEY OPERATIONS OFFICE

CHINOOK SALMON REPORT

December 2007

Note:Bold numbers are not verified by DFG & DWRPreliminary Data - Subject to Change

Winter Run Chinook Salmon Estimated Loss (Incidental Take) Spring Run Chinook Salmon Estimated Loss (Incidental Take) 

Daily SWP Daily CVP Daily Combined Season Combined Daily SWP Daily CVP Daily Combined Season Combined Dai

Tagged* No Tag Tagged* No Tag Tagged* No Tag Tagged* No Tag Tagged No Tag Tagged No Tag Tagged No Tag Tagged No Tag In 

DATE Estimated Estimated Estimated Estimated Estimated Estimated Estimated Estimated Estimated Estimated Estimated Estimated Estimated Estimated Estimated Estimated

Loss Loss Loss Loss Loss Loss Loss Loss Loss Loss Loss Loss Loss Loss Loss Loss

1-Dec-07 00 00 0000 0000 0000 2,751 

2-Dec-07 00 00 0000 0000 0000 2,391 

3-Dec-07 00 00 0000 0000 0000 2,313 

4-Dec-07 00 00 0000 0000 0000 3,080 

5-Dec-07 00 00 0000 0000 0000 2,090 

6-Dec-07 00 00 0000 0000 0000 3,338 

7-Dec-07 00 00 0000 0000 0000 4,726 

8-Dec-07 00 00 0000 0000 0000 5,737 9-Dec-07 00 00 0000 0000 0000 5,973 

10-Dec-07 00 00 0000 0000 0000 4,585 

11-Dec-07 00 00 0000 0000 0000 4,326 

12-Dec-07 00 00 0000 0000 0000 4,322 

13-Dec-07 00 00 0000 0000 0000 4,245 

14-Dec-07 00 00 0000 0000 0000 4,974 

15-Dec-07 00 00 0000 0000 0000 3,128 

16-Dec-07 00 00 0000 0000 0000 3,380 

17-Dec-07 00 00 0000 0000 0000 3,687 

18-Dec-07 00 00 0000 0000 0000 3,363 

19-Dec-07 00 00 0000 0000 0000 3,466 

20-Dec-07 00 00 0000 0000 0000 3,399 

21-Dec-07 00 00 0000 0000 0000 3,386 

22-Dec-07 00 00 0000 0000 0000 3,360 

23-Dec-07 00 00 0000 0000 0000 2,124 

24-Dec-07 00 00 0000 0000 0000 2,213 

25-Dec-07 00 00 0000 0000 0000 3,208 

26-Dec-07 00 00 0000 0000 0000 2,423 

27-Dec-07 00 00 0000 0000 0000 3,988 

28-Dec-07 00 00 0000 0000 0000 2,022 

29-Dec-07 00 00 0000 0000 0000 1,327 

30-Dec-07 00 00 0000 0000 0000 1,344 

31-Dec-07 00 00 0000 0000 0000 1,325 

Total 00 00 0 0 0 00000 0 0 0 0 101,996 

Winter Run Incidental Take Levels (Oct 1 thru May 31) Spring Run Incidental Take Levels for Season Combined Total (Oct 1 thru Jun 30)Tagged Yellow Light Level = ??? SeasonTagged Red Light Level = ??? SeasonNo Tag Yellow Light Level = ??? SeasonNo Tag Red Light Level = ??? Season* This number is determined by Winter Run Length only until the tags have been read. All tags from Winter Run length fish have been read and numbers have been updated thru ????

Banks T
#### Thomasita TAYLOR, Petitioner—Appellant, v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, Respondent— Appellee.

No. 05-74591.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted Feb. 13, 2006.*

Decided Feb. 22, 2006.

Thomasita Taylor, Phoenix, AZ, Pro Se.

Lynne L. Glasser, Donald L. Korb, Acting Chief Counsel Internal Revenue Ser*780vice, Robert J. Branman, Esq., Eileen J. O’Connor, Esq., Washington, DC, for Respondent-Appellee.

Before: FERNANDEZ, RYMER, and BYBEE, Circuit Judges.

*

 The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. *See*Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

MEMORANDUM **

Thomasita Taylor appeals pro se from the Tax Court’s decision in favor of the Commissioner of Internal Revenue (“Commissioner”) in her action contesting deficiencies for tax years 1993 through 1996. We dismiss the petition for review.

A notice of appeal must be filed with the Tax Court clerk within ninety days of the Tax Court’s decision. *See*26 U.S.C. § 7483; Fed. R.App. P. 13(a)(1). Here, Taylor filed a notice of appeal with this court, but not with the Tax Court, within the ninety-day period. Although a notice of appeal, mis-filed in this court, is to be sent to the district court and deemed filed in the district court on the date it was received in the court of appeals, *see*Fed. R.App. P. 4(d), this rule does not extend to appeals from the Tax Court, *see*Fed. R.App. P. 14. Accordingly, we lack jurisdiction over the appeal.

DISMISSED

**

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
### §277d–27. Execution of agreements

The United States Commissioner, International Boundary and Water Commission, United States and Mexico, is authorized to carry out those measures agreed upon for execution by the United States in the agreements concluded pursuant to section 277d–26 of this title.

(Pub. L. 88–411, §2, Aug. 10, 1964, 78 Stat. 386.)
#### § 641.330 How should the State Plan reflect community service needs?

The Governor, or the highest government official, must ensure that the State Plan identifies the types of community services that are needed and the places where these services are most needed. The State Plan should specifically identify the needs and locations of those individuals most in need of community services and the groups working to meet their needs. (OAA § 503(a)(4)(E)).
**EXHIBIT 32.2**

 

CERTIFICATIONPURSUANT TO RULE 13a-14(b) OF THE EXCHANGE ACT AND 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,ASENACTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

 

Inconnection with the Quarterly Report of Intrusion Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-QSBfor the three and nine-month periods ending March 31, 2006 as filed withthe Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I,Michael L. Paxton, Chief Financial Officer of the Company certify, pursuant to18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as enacted pursuant to Section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

(1)                                                          The Report fully complies with therequirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2)                                                          The information contained in the Reportfairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and resultsof operations of the Company.

 

 
| May 12,  2006 | /s/  Michael L. Paxton   |   |
|--------------------|--------------------------|--------|
| ** **         | Michael L. Paxton        |
|               | Chief  Financial Officer |

 

----