alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
##### 



EXHIBIT
10.25
 FIRST AMENDMENT TO
AMENDED REVOLVING CREDIT AGREEMENT
AND LOAN DOCUMENTS
 Amendment Credit Agreement Parent Alon LP Edgington Borrower Borrowers Lender Lenders Agent Bank Leumi
 WITNESSETH
    Definitions
 Amendment to Credit Agreement Section 12.24
 Edgington Not a Loan Party




---



##### 



Edgington Acquisition
Date
 Conditions to Effectiveness First
Amendment Effective Date
 Reservation of Rights
 Continued Effectiveness of Loan Documents
 -2-




---



##### 



Miscellaneous
   This Amendment shall be governed by, and construed in accordance with, the laws of the
State of New York.
   -3-




---



##### 



Borrowers:
ALON USA, LPBy:
    Alon USA GP, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company, its general partnerBy:
    /s/ David WiessmanName:
    David WiessmanTitle:
    Chairman of the Board of ManagersEOC ACQUISITION LLCBy:
    /s/ Harlin R. DeanName:
    Harlin R. DeanTitle:
    Vice President




---



##### 



Guarantor Companies:
ALON ASSETS, INC.
ALON USA OPERATING, INC
ALON USA REFINING, INC.
ALON ASPHALT BAKERSFIELD, INC
ALON USA, INC.
ALON USA ENERGY, INC.
ALON USA CAPITAL, INC.By:
    /s/ David WiessmanName:
    David WiessmanTitle:
    Chairman of the Board of DirectorsALON USA GP, LLCBy:
    /s/ David WiessmanName:
    David WiessmanTitle:
    Chairman of the Board of ManagersALON USA INTERESTS, LLCBy:
    /s/ Jeff D. MorrisName:
    Jeff D. MorrisTitle:
    Chairman of the Board of ManagersALON USA DELAWARE, LLC
ALON PIPELINE LOGISTICS, LLCBy:
    /s/ David WiessmanName:
    David WiessmanTitle:
    Chairman of the Board of Managers




---



##### 



ALON USA PIPELINE, INC.By:
    /s/ David WiessmanName:
    David WiessmanTitle:
    Chairman of the Board of Directors




---



##### 



ALON CRUDE PIPELINE, LLC
PARAMOUNT PETROLEUM HOLDINGS, INC.
PARAMOUNT OF WASHINGTON, LLC
PARAMOUNT OF OREGON, LLCBy:
    /s/ David WiessmanName:
    David WiessmanTitle:
    Chairman of the Board of Directors or
Managers, as applicable




---



##### 



Agent and Lender:
ISRAEL DISCOUNT BANK OF NEW YORKBy:
    /s/ Kevin LordName:
    Kevin LordTitle:
    First Vice PresidentBy:
    /s/ Jerry HertzmanName:
    Jerry HertzmanTitle:
    Senior Vice PresidentLender and Co-arranger:
BANK LEUMI USABy:
    /s/ Yuval TalmyName:
    Yuval TalmyTitle:
    First Vice PresidentBy:
    /s/ Hanita MuselName:
    Hanita MuselTitle:
    Assistant Treasurer
Dismissed and Memorandum Opinion filed September 9 , 2014
.

In The 

## Fourteenth Court of Appeals

NO. 14

- 14

- 00675

- CR NO. 14

- 14

- 00676

- CR

JAMES DAUBREY JONES , Appellant

V.
THE STATE OF TEXAS , Appellee
On Appeal from the 338th District Court

Harris County, Texas Trial Court Cause No s . 1399882 and 1400256

M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N

Appellant entered a guilty plea to two counts of aggravated robbery with a deadly weapon

. In each case, i n accordance with the terms of a plea bargain agreement with the State, the trial court sentenced appellant on July 29, 2014 , to confinement for twenty years in the Institutional Division of the Texas Department of Criminal Justice. The sentences were ordered to run concurrently. Appellant filed a pro se notice of ap peal in each case . We dismiss the appeal s

.2

In each case, t he trial court entered a certification of the defendant’s right to appeal in which the court certified that this is a plea bargain case, and the defendant has no right of appeal. See Tex. R. App. P. 25.2(a)(2). The trial court’s certification is included in each record on appeal. See Tex. R. App. P. 25.2(d). The record in each case supports the trial court’s certification. See Dears v. State , 154 S.W.3d 610, 615 (Tex. Crim. App. 2005).
Accordi ngly, we dismiss the appeal s

.

PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Chief Justice Frost and Justices Christopher and Busby.
Do Not Publish

— Tex. R. App. P. 47.2(b)
NREL is a national laboratory of the U.S. Department of Energy, Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy, operated by the Alliance for Sustainable Energy, LLC.

How Microgrids Will Shape 

the Future

Robert Preus

Small Wind Conference

June 16–19, 2014

Stevens Point, Wisconsin

NREL/PR-5000-62493
2

What is needed for a microgrid?

• Control of power and load balance

o Controllable power source

o Controllable load demand

o Power storage.

• Control of power quality

o Voltage support

o Frequency support

o Power factor (var) support.

• System controls

• Ability to synchronize with grid.
3

Microgrid function

• Currently microgrids are being developed for 

improving reliability or in some cases 

reducing power cost. 

o Commonly used for hospitals, fire stations, police, 

colleges, server farms, etc.

• They can be financially attractive especially if 

waste heat is useful and power is expensive.

• Primarily fossil-fuel based (natural gas and 

diesel are common).
4

Where does renewable energy (RE) fit in?

• RE can be anything from a major part, to 

minor feature, to not included at all.

• Financial impact of RE can be very 

complicated

o On the first level it is just a fuel saver.

o It can be a fuel supply extender. 

o It can be used to enable power or grid support 

services sales. 
5

What features are valuable in the system?

• Power control is desirable for both load and 

generation components. 

• Power quality support services are essential 

in at least some components. 

• Integrated controls that prioritize and control 

loads will reduce storage and inverter 

requirements. 

• RE input forecasting and load forecasting 

capability for controls will optimize assets. 
6

What is going on in demand response? 

• Technologies for behind-the-meter demand 

response and aggregation are being 

developed and reaching the market.

o Three-stage water heaters

o Refrigerators 

o Heating and air conditioning systems.

• Staging is another form of demand response.

o Clothes washer and dryer

o Dishwasher. 
7

Add it all together and what is available?

• Community or home microgrid or off grid

o Power by RE possibly with natural gas 

supplemental input

o Affordable storage used to stabilize grid quality 

o Smaller inverters will be needed due to staging 

and demand response. 

• All of these technologies can be integrated at 

the home, community, or larger level. 
8

How does distributed wind fit? 

• Microgrid or off-grid communities with 

photovoltaic and wind or small hydro and 

wind or other combinations 

o Individual homes could have wind generators. 

o The community could have wind generators. 

• Wind generators will need to be flexible 

players with power-limiting capability and 

the ability to contribute to power quality. 
robert.preus@nrel.gov
#### § 404.981 Effect of Appeals Council's decision or denial of review.

The Appeals Council may deny a party's request for review or it may decide to review a case and make a decision. The Appeals Council's decision, or the decision of the administrative law judge if the request for review is denied, is binding unless you or another party file an action in Federal district court, or the decision is revised. You may file an action in a Federal district court within 60 days after the date you receive notice of the Appeals Council's action.
### §276p. United States Senate-Japan Interparliamentary Group

#### (a) Establishment and meetings

Not to exceed 12 Senators shall be appointed to meet once per Congress with representatives of the Diet of Japan for discussion of common problems in the interest of relations between the United States and Japan. The Senators so appointed shall be referred to as the "United States group" of the United States Senate-Japan Interparliamentary Group. The meetings shall take place in Japan and Washington, D.C. alternatively.

#### (b) Appointment of members

The President of the Senate shall appoint Senators under this section, including a Chair and Vice Chair, upon recommendations of the majority and minority leaders of the Senate. Such appointments shall be for the duration of each Congress.

#### (c) Funding

There is authorized to be appropriated $100,000 for each Congress to assist in meeting the expenses of the United States group. Appropriations shall be disbursed on vouchers to be approved by the Chair of the United States group.

#### (d) Certification of expenditures

A report of expenditures by the United States group shall be prepared and certified each Congress by the Chair.

#### (e) Effective date

This section shall apply to fiscal year 2008, and each fiscal year thereafter.

(Pub. L. 110–161, div. H, title I, §5, Dec. 26, 2007, 121 Stat. 2221.)
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Defense

###### Office of the Secretary

# AGENCY:

Department of Defense.

# ACTION:

Notice.

# SUMMARY:

                        The Defense Logistics Agency (DLA) is updating its Address Directory which is published as an appendix to DLA's compilation of Privacy Act systems of records notices. This notice benefits the public in advising them where to send requests for review. DLA FOIA/Privacy Points of Contact are found at:                         *http://www.dla.mil/​foia-privacy/​foia_​poc.aspx.*

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Ms. Jody Sinkler, 703-767-5045.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

DLA Address Directory:

Defense Logistics Agency Headquarters, Andrew T. McNamara Building, 8725 John J. Kingman Road, Fort Belvoir, VA 22060-6221;

DLA Document Services Headquarters, 5450 Carlisle Pike Building 09,  P.O. Box 2020,  Mechanicsburg, PA 17055-0788;

DLA Distribution, 2001 Mission Drive, New Cumberland, PA 17070-5000;

DLA Energy, 8725 John J. Kingman Road, Fort Belvoir, VA 22060-6221;

DLA Logistics Information Service, 74 Washington Avenue, N., Battle Creek, MI 49037-3084;

DLA Strategic Materials, 8725 John J. Kingman Road, Fort Belvoir, VA 22060-6221;

DLA Disposition Services, 74 N. Washington, Battle Creek, MI 49037-3092;

DLA Land and Maritime, 3990 East Broad Street,  Columbus, OH 43218-3990;

DLA Troop Support, 700 Robbins Avenue, Philadelphia, PA 19111-5092;

DLA Aviation, 8000 Jefferson Davis Highway, Richmond, VA 23297-5000;

                    DLA Transaction Services, 5250 Pearson Road, Building 207, Area C, Wright Patterson, OH 45433-5328;                          ( print page 22682)    

DLA Logistics Management Standards Office, 8725 John J. Kingman Road, Fort Belvoir, VA 22060-6221;

DLA Central, 7115 South Boundary Boulevard,  MacDill AFB, FL 33621-5101;

DLA Europe and Africa, Unit 23152, APO AE 09227; 

DLA Pacific, 1025 Quincy Avenue, Suite 2000, Pearl Harbor, HI 96860-4512.

Dated: April 19, 2011.

Morgan F. Park,

Alternate OSD Federal Register Liaison Officer, Department of Defense.

[FR Doc. 2011-9752 Filed 4-21-11; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 5001-06-P
#### § 411.505 How is an EN paid?

An EN (including a State VR agency acting as an EN) can elect to be paid under either the outcome payment system or the outcome-milestone payment system. The EN will elect a payment system at the time the EN enters into an agreement with us. (For State VR agencies, see § 411.365.) The EN (or State VR agency) may periodically change its elected EN payment system as described in § 411.515.

[73 FR 29346, May 20, 2008]
[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 5 (Friday, January 7, 2011)]
[Notices]
[Pages 1185-1186]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2011-98]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

Health Resources and Services Administration


National Advisory Council on Migrant Health; Notice of Meeting

    In accordance with section 10(a)(2) of the Federal Advisory 
Committee Act (Pub. L. 92-463), notice is hereby given of the following 
meeting:

    Name: National Advisory Council on Migrant Health.
    Dates and Times: February 8, 2011, 8:30 a.m. to 5 p.m. February 
9, 2011, 8:30 a.m. to 5 p.m.
    Place: L'Enfant Plaza Hotel, 480 L'Enfant Plaza, SW., 
Washington, DC 20024. Telephone: (202) 484-1000. Fax: (202) 646-
4456.
    Status: The meeting will be open to the public.
    Purpose: The purpose of the meeting is to discuss services and 
issues related to the health of migrant and seasonal farmworkers and 
their families and to formulate recommendations for the Secretary of 
Health and Human Services.
    Agenda: The agenda includes an overview of the Council's general 
business activities. The Council will also hear presentations from 
experts on farmworker issues, including the status of farmworker 
health at the local and national levels. Agenda items are subject to 
change as priorities indicate.

[[Page 1186]]

    For Further Information Contact: Marcia Gomez, MD, Office of 
Special Population Health, Bureau of Primary Health Care, Health 
Resources and Services Administration, 5600 Fishers Lane, Rockville, 
Maryland 20857; telephone (301) 594-4897.

    Dated: January 3, 2011.
Robert Hendricks,
Director, Division of Policy and Information Coordination.
[FR Doc. 2011-98 Filed 1-6-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4165-15-P
#### § 10.314 Will OWCP pay for the services of an attendant?

Yes, OWCP will pay for the services of an attendant where the need for such services has been medically documented. In the exercise of the discretion afforded by 5 U.S.C. 8111(a), the Director has determined that, except where attendant service payments were being made prior to January 4, 1999, direct payments to the claimant to cover such services will no longer be made. Rather, the cost of providing attendant services will be paid under section 8103 of the Act, and medical bills for these services will be considered under § 10.801, so long as the personal care services have been determined to be medically necessary and are provided by a home health aide, licensed practical nurse, or similarly trained individual, subject to requirements specified by OWCP. By paying for the services under section 8103, OWCP can better determine whether the services provided are necessary, and what type of provider is most qualified to provide adequate care to meet the needs of the injured employee. In addition, a system requiring the personal care provider to submit a bill to OWCP, where the amount billed will be subject to OWCP's fee schedule, will result in greater fiscal accountability.
Editorial Note on Part 416
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 416 appear at 68 FR 53509, Sept. 11, 2003.

§ 416.1483 Case remanded by a Federal court. ( a ) *General rule.* When a Federal court remands a case to the Commissioner for further consideration, the Appeals Council, acting on behalf of the Commissioner, may make a decision following the provisions in paragraph (b) or (c) of this section, dismiss the proceedings, except as provided in paragraph (d) of this section, or remand the case to an administrative law judge following the provisions in paragraph (e) of this section with instructions to take action and issue a decision or return the case to the Appeals Council with a recommended decision. Any issues relating to the claim(s) may be considered by the Appeals Council or administrative law judge whether or not they were raised in the administrative proceedings leading to the final decision in the case.
( b ) *Appeals Council decision without a hearing.* If the Appeals Council assumes responsibility under paragraph (a) of this section for issuing a decision without a hearing, it will follow the procedures explained in §§ 416.1473 and 416.1479.
( c ) *Administrative appeals judge decision after holding a hearing.* If the Appeals Council assumes responsibility for issuing a decision and a hearing is necessary to complete adjudication of the claim(s), an administrative appeals judge will hold a hearing using the procedures set forth in §§ 416.1429 through 416.1461, as applicable.
( d ) *Appeals Council dismissal.* After a Federal court remands a case to the Commissioner for further consideration, the Appeals Council may dismiss the proceedings before it for any reason that an administrative law judge may dismiss a request for a hearing under § 416.1457. The Appeals Council will not dismiss the proceedings in a claim where we are otherwise required by law or a judicial order to file the Commissioner's additional and modified findings of fact and decision with a court.
( e ) *Appeals Council remand.* If the Appeals Council remands a case under paragraph (a) of this section, it will follow the procedures explained in § 416.1477.
[85 FR 73160, Nov. 16, 2020]
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
EXHIBIT  27  CONTAINS  SUMMARY   INFORMATION   EXTRACTED  FROM  OMI  CORP.  AND
SUBSIDIARIES CONSOLIDATED CONDENSED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS
ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1,000
<CURRENCY>                                     U.S. DOLLARS
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                                   JUN-30-1997
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                1
<CASH>                                         34,074
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  13,221
<ALLOWANCES>                                   0
<INVENTORY>                                    0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               68,643
<PP&E>                                         515,920
<DEPRECIATION>                                 191,508
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 524,899
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          49,220
<BONDS>                                        159,237
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       21,440
<OTHER-SE>                                     190,647
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   524,899
<SALES>                                        0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               114,766
<CGS>                                          0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  86,470
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               22,002
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             7,209
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                5,283
<INCOME-TAX>                                   1,185
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            0
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   4,098
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  0.10
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  0.10
        

</TABLE>
[if !vml]>[endif]>

[if !vml]>[endif]>

You have reached the FederalDepository Library Program Electronic Collection (FDLP/EC) Archive. Thisarchive assures ongoing access to publications in the FDLP/EC. Access topublications in the archive is available through GPO's suite of cataloging andlocator services, including the Catalog of U.S. Government Publications(CGP).  Archived copies of publications are retrieved in the event thatpublications are no longer available from the original publishing agency site. 
**Title:****Geospatial datasets forassessing the effects of rangeland conditions on dissolved-solids yields in theupper Colorado River Basin**
 
Report
Shapefiles:Land Disturbance | BLM Grazing Projected | Roads | USFS Grazing Projected | Vegetation Type Cover | R-factor
 
SuDoc Number:I 19.76:2015-1007
Item Number:0624-H (online)
CGP systemNumber:000942330
 
April 23, 2018
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 16-7266

RAYMOND BRADLEY MCCARTER,

Petitioner - Appellant,

v.

WARDEN OF WATEREE CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION,

Respondent - Appellee,

and

STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA,

Respondent.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Rock 

Hill. Bruce H. Hendricks, District Judge. (0:15-cv-02697-BHH)

Submitted: March 30, 2017 Decided: April 3, 2017

Before TRAXLER and WYNN, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
2

Raymond Bradley McCarter, Appellant Pro Se. Donald John Zelenka, Senior Assistant 

Attorney General, Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
3

PER CURIAM:

Raymond Bradley McCarter seeks to appeal the district court’s order accepting the 

recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 

(2012) petition. The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a 

certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1)(A) (2012). A certificate of 

appealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional 

right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2012). When the district court denies relief on the 

merits, a prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would 

find that the district court’s assessment of the constitutional claims is debatable or wrong. 

Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000); see Miller-El v. Cockrell, 537 U.S. 322, 

336-38 (2003). When the district court denies relief on procedural grounds, the prisoner 

must demonstrate both that the dispositive procedural ruling is debatable, and that the 

petition states a debatable claim of the denial of a constitutional right. Slack, 529 U.S. at 

484-85. 

We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that McCarter has not 

made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability, deny 

leave to proceed in forma pauperis, and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral 

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the 

materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process. 

DISMISSED