22814 Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 79 / Monday, April 25, 2011 / Rules and Regulations 

category of actions that do not 

individually or cumulatively have a 

significant effect on the human 

environment. This rule is categorically 

excluded, under figure 2–1, paragraph 

(34)(g), of the Instruction. This rule 

involves establishment of a temporary 

safety zone. An environmental analysis 

checklist and a categorical exclusion 

determination are available in the 

docket where indicated under 

ADDRESSES. 

List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 165 

Harbors, Marine safety, Navigation 

(water), Reporting and recordkeeping 

requirements, Security measures, 

Waterways. 

For the reasons discussed in the 

preamble, the Coast Guard amends 33 

CFR part 165 as follows: 

PART 165—REGULATED NAVIGATION 

AREAS AND LIMITED ACCESS AREAS 

■ 1. The authority citation for part 165 

continues to read as follows: 

Authority: 33 U.S.C. 1226, 1231; 46 U.S.C. 

Chapter 701, 3306, 3703; 50 U.S.C. 191, 195; 

33 CFR 1.05–1, 6.04–1, 6.04–6, and 160.5; 

Pub. L. 107–295, 116 Stat. 2064; Department 

of Homeland Security Delegation No. 0170.1. 

■ 2. Add § 165.T11–405 to read as 

follows: 

§ 165.T11–405 Safety zone; Sea World 

Fireworks; Mission Bay, San Diego, CA. 

(a) Location. The safety zone will 

include the area within 600 feet of the 

fireworks barge in approximate position 

32°46′03′′ N, 117°13′11′′ W. 

(b) Enforcement Period. This section 

will only be enforced from 8:45 p.m. to 

10:15 p.m. on evenings with a fireworks 

show. Fireworks shows are currently 

scheduled for the following dates in 

2011: April 2, 9, 16 and 23, May 28, 29 

and 30, June 4 and 5, 11 and 12, nightly 

from June 16 through August 21, August 

26, 27, and 28, September 3, 4, and 5, 

November 18, December 9 and 31. If this 

schedule changes the Coast Guard will 

announce that fact via Broadcast Notice 

to Mariners no less than 24 hours before 

the event. If the event concludes prior 

to the scheduled termination time, the 

Captain of the Port will cease 

enforcement of this safety zone and will 

announce that fact via Broadcast Notice 

to Mariners. 

(c) Definitions. The following 

definition applies to this section: 

designated representative means any 

commissioned, warrant, or petty officer 

of the Coast Guard on board Coast 

Guard, Coast Guard Auxiliary, local, 

state, or federal law enforcement vessels 

who have been authorized to act on the 

behalf of the Captain of the Port. 

(d) Regulations. (1) In accordance 

with general regulations in 33 CFR Part 

165, Subpart C, entry into, transit 

through or anchoring within this safety 

zone is prohibited unless authorized by 

the Captain of the Port of San Diego or 

his designated representative. 

(2) Mariners requesting permission to 

transit through the safety zone may 

request authorization to do so from the 

Sector San Diego Command Center. The 

Command Center may be contacted on 

VHF–FM Channel 16. 

(3) All persons and vessels shall 

comply with the instructions of the 

Coast Guard Captain of the Port or his 

designated representative. 

(4) Upon being hailed by U.S. Coast 

Guard patrol personnel by siren, radio, 

flashing light, or other means, the 

operator of a vessel shall proceed as 

directed. 

(5) The Coast Guard may be assisted 

by other federal, state, or local agencies. 

Dated: April 1, 2011. 

T.H. Farris, 

Captain, U.S. Coast Guard, Captain of the 

Port San Diego. 

[FR Doc. 2011–9893 Filed 4–22–11; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 9110–04–P 

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION 

AGENCY 

40 CFR Part 52 

[EPA–R03–OAR–2010–0882; FRL–9298–1] 

Approval and Promulgation of Air 

Quality Implementation Plans; Virginia; 

Adoption of the Revised Lead 

Standards and Related Reference 

Conditions and Update of Appendices 

AGENCY: Environmental Protection 

Agency (EPA). 

ACTION: Final rule. 

SUMMARY: EPA is approving a State 

Implementation Plan (SIP) revision 

submitted by the Commonwealth of 

Virginia. The revisions add the primary 

and secondary lead standards of 0.15 

micrograms per cubic meter (μg/m3), 

related reference conditions, and update 

the list of appendices under ‘‘Documents 

Incorporated by Reference.’’ Virginia’s 

SIP revisions for the National Ambient 

Air Quality Standards (NAAQS) for lead 

are consistent with the Federal lead 

standards. This action is being taken 

under the Clean Air Act (CAA). 

DATES: Effective Date: This final rule is 

effective on May 25, 2011. 

ADDRESSES: EPA has established a 

docket for this action under Docket ID 

Number EPA–R03–OAR–2010–0882. All 

documents in the docket are listed in 

the http://www.regulations.gov Web 

site. Although listed in the electronic 

docket, some information is not publicly 

available, i.e., confidential business 

information (CBI) or other information 

whose disclosure is restricted by statute. 

Certain other material, such as 

copyrighted material, is not placed on 

the Internet and will be publicly 

available only in hard copy form. 

Publicly available docket materials are 

available either electronically through 

http://www.regulations.gov or in hard 

copy for public inspection during 

normal business hours at the Air 

Protection Division, U.S. Environmental 

Protection Agency, Region III, 1650 

Arch Street, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 

19103. Copies of the State submittal are 

available at the Virginia Department of 

Environmental Quality, 629 East Main 

Street, Richmond, Virginia 23219. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Irene Shandruk, (215) 814–2166, or by 

e-mail at shandruk.irene@epa.gov. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

I. Background 

On January 26, 2011 (76 FR 4579), 

EPA published a notice of proposed 

rulemaking (NPR) for the 

Commonwealth of Virginia. The NPR 

proposed approval of Virginia’s SIP 

revision pertaining to the NAAQS for 

lead and related reference conditions. 

The CAA specifies that EPA must reevaluate the appropriateness of the 

NAAQS every five years. As part of the 

process, EPA reviewed the latest 

research and determined that revised 

standards for lead were necessary to 

protect public health and welfare. EPA 

revised the level of the primary lead 

standard to a level of 0.15 μg/m3 to 

provide increased protection for 

children and other ‘‘at risk’’ populations. 

The secondary standard was also 

revised to a level of 

0.15 μg/m3 to afford increased 

protection for the environment. EPA 

promulgated the more stringent primary 

and secondary NAAQS for lead on 

November 12, 2008 (73 FR 66964). One 

adverse comment was submitted on 

EPA’s January 26, 2011 NPR (76 FR 

4579). A summary of the comment and 

EPA’s response is provided in section IV 

of this document. 

II. Summary of SIP Revision 

On September 27, 2010, the 

Commonwealth of Virginia submitted a 

formal revision to its SIP. The SIP 

revision consists of an amendment 

which includes the revised primary and 

secondary NAAQS for lead and related 

reference conditions. Virginia’s revision 

incorporates the Federal lead standards 


jdjones on DSKHWCL6B1PROD with RULES
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 79 / Monday, April 25, 2011 / Rules and Regulations 22815 

into the Code of Virginia (9VAC5 

Chapter 30). In addition, the list of 

appendices to 40 CFR Part 51 was 

updated under ‘‘Documents 

Incorporated by Reference’’ (9VAC5–20– 

21). 

The following are the specific sections 

that are being modified or amended: 

• 9VAC5–20–21: Documents 

Incorporated by Reference (modified) 

• 9VAC5–30–15: Reference 

Conditions (modified) 

• 9VAC5–30–80: Lead (amended) 

III. General Information Pertaining to 

SIP Submittals From the 

Commonwealth of Virginia 

In 1995, Virginia adopted legislation 

that provides, subject to certain 

conditions, for an environmental 

assessment (audit) ‘‘privilege’’ for 

voluntary compliance evaluations 

performed by a regulated entity. The 

legislation further addresses the relative 

burden of proof for parties either 

asserting the privilege or seeking 

disclosure of documents for which the 

privilege is claimed. Virginia’s 

legislation also provides, subject to 

certain conditions, for a penalty waiver 

for violations of environmental laws 

when a regulated entity discovers such 

violations pursuant to a voluntary 

compliance evaluation and voluntarily 

discloses such violations to the 

Commonwealth and takes prompt and 

appropriate measures to remedy the 

violations. Virginia’s Voluntary 

Environmental Assessment Privilege 

Law, Va. Code Sec. 10.1–1198, provides 

a privilege that protects from disclosure 

documents and information about the 

content of those documents that are the 

product of a voluntary environmental 

assessment. The Privilege Law does not 

extend to documents or information (1) 

That are generated or developed before 

the commencement of a voluntary 

environmental assessment; (2) that are 

prepared independently of the 

assessment process; (3) that demonstrate 

a clear, imminent and substantial 

danger to the public health or 

environment; or (4) that are required by 

law. 

On January 12, 1998, the 

Commonwealth of Virginia Office of the 

Attorney General provided a legal 

opinion that states that the Privilege 

law, Va. Code Sec. 10.1–1198, precludes 

granting a privilege to documents and 

information ‘‘required by law,’’ 

including documents and information 

‘‘required by Federal law to maintain 

program delegation, authorization or 

approval,’’ since Virginia must ‘‘enforce 

Federally authorized environmental 

programs in a manner that is no less 

stringent than their Federal counterparts 

* * *.’’ The opinion concludes that 

‘‘[r]egarding § 10.1–1198, therefore, 

documents or other information needed 

for civil or criminal enforcement under 

one of these programs could not be 

privileged because such documents and 

information are essential to pursuing 

enforcement in a manner required by 

Federal law to maintain program 

delegation, authorization or approval.’’ 

Virginia’s Immunity law, Va. Code 

Sec. 10.1–1199, provides that ‘‘[t]o the 

extent consistent with requirements 

imposed by Federal law,’’ any person 

making a voluntary disclosure of 

information to a state agency regarding 

a violation of an environmental statute, 

regulation, permit, or administrative 

order is granted immunity from 

administrative or civil penalty. The 

Attorney General’s January 12, 1998 

opinion states that the quoted language 

renders this statute inapplicable to 

enforcement of any Federally authorized 

programs, since ‘‘no immunity could be 

afforded from administrative, civil, or 

criminal penalties because granting 

such immunity would not be consistent 

with Federal law, which is one of the 

criteria for immunity.’’ Therefore, EPA 

has determined that Virginia’s Privilege 

and Immunity statutes will not preclude 

the Commonwealth from enforcing its 

program consistent with the Federal 

requirements. In any event, because 

EPA has also determined that a state 

audit privilege and immunity law can 

affect only state enforcement and cannot 

have any impact on Federal 

enforcement authorities, EPA may at 

any time invoke its authority under the 

CAA, including, for example, sections 

113, 167, 205, 211 or 213, to enforce the 

requirements or prohibitions of the state 

plan, independently of any state 

enforcement effort. In addition, citizen 

enforcement under section 304 of the 

CAA is likewise unaffected by this, or 

any, state audit privilege or immunity 

law. Other specific requirements and 

the rationale for EPA’s proposed action 

are explained in the NPR and will not 

be restated here. As noted below, EPA 

received one comment on the NPR and 

it was not germane. 

IV. Summary of Public Comments and 

EPA Responses 

Comment: A small business owner 

expressed concern about having 

additional costs imposed upon 

individuals who work on lead paintcontaining homes built before 1978. The 

commenter stated that the business 

climate cannot support another 

regulation and expressed concern about 

being able to remain in business with 

the adoption of this rule. 

Response: This comment is not 

relevant to this rulemaking action. The 

commenter discusses lead as it relates to 

lead-containing paints and the 

requirement for its removal in homes 

built prior to 1978. This action imposes 

no requirements with respect to the 

removal of lead-containing paint from 

homes built prior to 1978. This action 

is concerned with the adoption of the 

2008 lead NAAQS by the 

Commonwealth of Virginia into the 

Commonwealth’s SIP. 

V. Final Action 

EPA is approving Virginia’s SIP 

revision for the lead NAAQS and related 

reference conditions, as well as the 

updated list of appendices to 40 CFR 

part 51 under documents incorporated 

by reference. 

VI. Statutory and Executive Order 

Reviews 

A. General Requirements 

Under the CAA, the Administrator is 

required to approve a SIP submission 

that complies with the provisions of the 

CAA and applicable Federal regulations. 

42 U.S.C. 7410(k); 40 CFR 52.02(a). 

Thus, in reviewing SIP submissions, 

EPA’s role is to approve state choices, 

provided that they meet the criteria of 

the CAA. Accordingly, this action 

merely approves state law as meeting 

Federal requirements and does not 

impose additional requirements beyond 

those imposed by state law. For that 

reason, this action: 

• Is not a ‘‘significant regulatory 

action’’ subject to review by the Office 

of Management and Budget under 

Executive Order 12866 (58 FR 51735, 

October 4, 1993); 

• Does not impose an information 

collection burden under the provisions 

of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 

U.S.C. 3501 et seq.); 

• Is certified as not having a 

significant economic impact on a 

substantial number of small entities 

under the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 

U.S.C. 601 et seq.); 

• Does not contain any unfunded 

mandate or significantly or uniquely 

affect small governments, as described 

in the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act 

of 1995 (Pub. L. 104–4); 

• Does not have Federalism 

implications as specified in Executive 

Order 13132 (64 FR 43255, August 10, 

1999); 

• Is not an economically significant 

regulatory action based on health or 

safety risks subject to Executive Order 

13045 (62 FR 19885, April 23, 1997); 

• Is not a significant regulatory action 

subject to Executive Order 13211 (66 FR 

28355, May 22, 2001); 


jdjones on DSKHWCL6B1PROD with RULES
22816 Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 79 / Monday, April 25, 2011 / Rules and Regulations 

• Is not subject to requirements of 

Section 12(d) of the National 

Technology Transfer and Advancement 

Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C. 272 note) because 

application of those requirements would 

be inconsistent with the CAA; and 

• Does not provide EPA with the 

discretionary authority to address, as 

appropriate, disproportionate human 

health or environmental effects, using 

practicable and legally permissible 

methods, under Executive Order 12898 

(59 FR 7629, February 16, 1994). 

In addition, this rule does not have 

tribal implications as specified by 

Executive Order 13175 (65 FR 67249, 

November 9, 2000), because the SIP is 

not approved to apply in Indian country 

located in the state, and EPA notes that 

it will not impose substantial direct 

costs on tribal governments or preempt 

tribal law. 

B. Submission to Congress and the 

Comptroller General 

The Congressional Review Act, 5 

U.S.C. 801 et seq., as added by the Small 

Business Regulatory Enforcement 

Fairness Act of 1996, generally provides 

that before a rule may take effect, the 

agency promulgating the rule must 

submit a rule report, which includes a 

copy of the rule, to each House of the 

Congress and to the Comptroller General 

of the United States. EPA will submit a 

report containing this action and other 

required information to the U.S. Senate, 

the U.S. House of Representatives, and 

the Comptroller General of the United 

States prior to publication of the rule in 

the Federal Register. A major rule 

cannot take effect until 60 days after it 

is published in the Federal Register. 

This action is not a ‘‘major rule’’ as 

defined by 5 U.S.C. 804(2). 

C. Petitions for Judicial Review 

Under section 307(b)(1) of the CAA, 

petitions for judicial review of this 

action must be filed in the United States 

Court of Appeals for the appropriate 

circuit by June 24, 2011. Filing a 

petition for reconsideration by the 

Administrator of this final rule does not 

affect the finality of this action for the 

purposes of judicial review nor does it 

extend the time within which a petition 

for judicial review may be filed, and 

shall not postpone the effectiveness of 

such rule or action. This action 

pertaining to Virginia’s adoption of the 

revised lead standards of 0.15 μg/m3

and related reference conditions may 

not be challenged later in proceedings to 

enforce its requirements. (See section 

307(b)(2).) 

List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52 

Environmental protection, Air 

pollution control, Incorporation by 

reference, Lead, Reporting and 

recordkeeping requirements. 

Dated: April 6, 2011. 

W.C. Early, 

Acting Regional Administrator, Region III. 

40 CFR Part 52 is amended as follows: 

PART 52—[AMENDED] 

■ 1. The authority citation for 40 CFR 

part 52 continues to read as follows: 

Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq. 

Subpart VV—Virginia 

■ 2. In § 52.2420, the table in paragraph 

(c) is amended by revising the entries 

for Sections 5–30–15 and 5–30–80. The 

table in paragraph (e) is amended by 

adding an entry for ‘‘Documents 

Incorporated by Reference’’ after the 

ninth existing entry for ‘‘Documents 

Incorporated by Reference.’’ The 

amendments read as follows: 

§ 52.2420 Identification of plan. 

* * * * * 

(c) * * * 

EPA-APPROVED VIRGINIA REGULATIONS AND STATUTES

State citation Title/subject 

State 

effective 

date 

EPA approval date Explanation [former 

SIP citation] 

*******

9 VAC 5, Chapter 30 Ambient Air Quality Standards [Part III] 

*******

5–30–15 ................................... Reference conditions ............................... 6/24/09 .................... 4/25/11 [Insert page 

number where the 

document begins].

Revised section. 

* * * * * * * 

5–30–80 ................................... Lead ......................................................... 6/24/09 .................... 4/25/11 [Insert page 

number where the 

document begins].

Amended paragraphs 

A. and B.; added 

paragraph C. 

* * * * * * * 

* * * * * (e) * * * 

Name of non-regulatory SIP revision Applicable 

geographic area 

State 

submittal 

date 

EPA approval date Additional 

explanation 

*******

Documents Incorporated by Reference (9 VAC 5–20–21, Sections E.1.a.(1)(q) and E.1.a.(1)(r)).Statewide ................ 9/27/10 4/25/11 [Insert page 

number where the 

document begins].

Revised sections. 

*******


jdjones on DSKHWCL6B1PROD with RULES
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 79 / Monday, April 25, 2011 / Rules and Regulations 22817 

* * * * * 

[FR Doc. 2011–9697 Filed 4–22–11; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 6560–50–P 

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION 

AGENCY 

40 CFR Part 52 

[SC–200906; FRL–9286–2] 

Approval and Promulgation of Air 

Quality Implementation Plans; South 

Carolina; Update to Materials 

Incorporated by Reference 

AGENCY: Environmental Protection 

Agency (EPA). 

ACTION: Final rule; notice of 

administrative change. 

SUMMARY: EPA is publishing this action 

to provide the public with notice of the 

update to the South Carolina State 

Implementation Plan (SIP) compilation. 

In particular, materials submitted by 

South Carolina that are incorporated by 

reference (IBR) into the South Carolina 

SIP are being updated to reflect EPAapproved revisions to South Carolina’s 

SIP that have occurred since the last 

update. In this action, EPA is also 

notifying the public of the correction of 

certain typographical errors. 

DATES: This action is effective April 25, 

2011. 

ADDRESSES: SIP materials which are 

incorporated by reference into 40 Code 

of Federal Regulations (CFR) part 52 are 

available for inspection at the following 

locations: Environmental Protection 

Agency, Region 4, 61 Forsyth Street, 

SW., Atlanta, GA 30303; the Air and 

Radiation Docket and Information 

Center, EPA Headquarters Library, 

Infoterra Room (Room Number 3334), 

EPA West Building, 1301 Constitution 

Ave., NW., Washington, DC 20460, and 

the National Archives and Records 

Administration. If you wish to obtain 

materials from a docket in the EPA 

Headquarters Library, please call the 

Office of Air and Radiation (OAR) 

Docket/Telephone number: (202) 566– 

1742. For information on the availability 

of this material at NARA, call 202–741– 

6030, or go to: http://www.archives.gov/ 

federal-register/cfr/ibr-locations.html. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ms. 

Nacosta C. Ward at the above Region 4 

address or at (404) 562–9140. Ms. Ward 

may also be contacted via electronic 

mail at: ward.nacosta@epa.gov. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Each state 

has a SIP containing the control 

measures and strategies used to attain 

and maintain the national ambient air 

quality standards (NAAQS). The SIP is 

extensive, containing such elements as 

air pollution control regulations, 

emission inventories, monitoring 

networks, attainment demonstrations, 

and enforcement mechanisms. 

Each state must formally adopt the 

control measures and strategies in the 

SIP after the public has had an 

opportunity to comment on them and 

then submit the SIP to EPA. Once these 

control measures and strategies are 

approved by EPA, after notice and 

comment, they are incorporated into the 

federally approved SIP and are 

identified in part 52 ‘‘Approval and 

Promulgation of Implementation Plans,’’ 

Title 40 of the CFR (40 CFR part 52). 

The full text of the state regulation 

approved by EPA is not reproduced in 

its entirety in 40 CFR part 52, but is 

‘‘incorporated by reference.’’ This means 

that EPA has approved a given state 

regulation with a specific effective date. 

The public is referred to the location of 

the full text version should they want to 

know which measures are contained in 

a given SIP. The information provided 

allows EPA and the public to monitor 

the extent to which a state implements 

a SIP to attain and maintain the NAAQS 

and to take enforcement action if 

necessary. 

The SIP is a living document which 

the state can revise as necessary to 

address the unique air pollution 

problems in the state. Therefore, EPA 

from time to time must take action on 

SIP revisions containing new and/or 

revised regulations as being part of the 

SIP. On May 22, 1997 (62 FR 27968), 

EPA revised the procedures for 

incorporating by reference, into the 

CFR, materials submitted by states in 

their EPA-approved SIP revisions. These 

changes revised the format for the 

identification of the SIP in 40 CFR part 

52, streamlined the mechanisms for 

announcing EPA approval of revisions 

to a SIP, and streamlined the 

mechanisms for EPA’s updating of the 

IBR information contained for each SIP 

in 40 CFR part 52. The revised 

procedures also called for EPA to 

maintain ‘‘SIP Compilations’’ that 

contain the federally approved 

regulations and source specific permits 

submitted by each state agency. These 

SIP Compilations are contained in 

3-ring binders and are updated 

primarily on an annual basis. Under the 

revised procedures, EPA is to 

periodically publish an informational 

document in the rules section of the 

Federal Register when updates are 

made to a SIP Compilation for a 

particular state. EPA’s 1997 revised 

procedures were formally applied to 

South Carolina on July 1, 1997 (62 FR 

35441). 

This action represents EPA’s 

publication of the South Carolina SIP 

Compilation update, appearing in 40 

CFR part 52. In addition, notice is 

provided for the following 

typographical corrections to Tables (c), 

(d), and (e) of paragraph 52.2120, as 

described below: 

1. Correcting typographical errors listed in 

paragraphs 52.2120(c), (d), and (e) removing 

all periods after the Federal Register notice 

citation. 

2. Revising the date format listed in 

paragraphs 52.2120(c), (d), and (e). Revise the 

date format in the ‘‘state effective date,’’ and 

‘‘EPA approval date,’’ columns for 

consistency. Dates are numerical month/day/ 

year without additional zeros. 

3. Restoring all missing entries in table (e). 

4. In paragraph (c), the following revisions: 

a. Capitalizing the word ‘‘subject’’ in the 

column header ‘‘Title/Subject;’’ 

b. Underlining the words ‘‘Federal’’ and 

‘‘Register’’ and capitalizing the letter ‘‘r’’ in the 

word ‘‘register’’ in the column entitled 

‘‘Federal Register notice’’ for consistency 

within the paragraph and the Federal 

Register rulemakings. 

c. Revising the format of paragraph (c) by 

removing the second entry of ‘‘Regulation No. 

62.1 Definitions and General Requirements’’ 

and creating rows for all Parts contained in 

Regulation 62.5, Standard No. 5, Volatile 

Organic Compounds, ‘‘Section I—General 

Provisions’’ and ‘‘Section II—Provisions for 

Specific Sources.’’ 

d. Inserting the ‘‘State effective date,’’ ‘‘EPA 

approval date,’’ and ‘‘Federal Register notice’’ 

citation to read in the correct columns for 

Regulation No. 62.2 ‘‘Prohibition of Open 

Burning.’’ 

e. Correcting the ‘‘Title/Subject’’ under 

Regulation 62.5 for: 

i. Standard No. 1, ‘‘Section II—Particulate 

Matter Emissions;’’ 

ii. Standard No. 5, ‘‘Section II—Provisions 

for Specific Sources’’ 

1. Part C—Surface Coating of Paper, Vinyl, 

and Fabric 

2. Part D—Surface Coating of Metal 

Furniture, and Large Appliances 

3. Part F—Surface Coating of 

Miscellaneous Metal Parts and Products;’’ 

f. correcting the ‘‘State effective date’’ for: 

i. Regulation 62.3 ‘‘Section II—Emission 

Reduction Requirements;’’ 

ii. Regulation 62.5, Standard No. 1— 

Emissions from Fuel Burning Operations 

1. ‘‘Section II—Particulate Matter 

Emissions’’ 

2. ‘‘Section IV—Opacity Monitoring 

Requirements’’ 

3. ‘‘Section V—Exemptions;’’ 

iii. Regulation 62.5, Standard No. 4— 

Emissions from Process Industries 

1. ‘‘Section I—General’’ 

2. ‘‘Section II—Sulfuric Acid 

Manufacturing’’ 

3. ‘‘Section III—Kraft Pulp and Paper 

Manufacturing Plants’’ 

4. ‘‘Section IV—Portland Cement 

Manufacturing’’ 

5. ‘‘Section VI—Hot Mix Asphalt 

Manufacturing’’ 

6. ‘‘Section VII—Metal Refining;’’ 


jdjones on DSKHWCL6B1PROD with RULES