alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 21.1



SUBSIDIARIES OF REGISTRANT



|                                       |  |                        
|-------------------------------------- |  | -----------------------
|NAME OF SUBSIDIARY                     |  | COUNTRY OF ORGANIZATION
|Lazard International Holdings, Inc.    |  | U.S.                   
|Lazard Frères & Co. LLC                |  | U.S.                   
|Lazard Asset Management LLC            |  | U.S.                   
|Lazard Funding Limited LLC             |  | U.S.                   
|Lazard & Co., Holdings Limited         |  | United Kingdom         
|Lazard & Co., Limited                  |  | United Kingdom         
|Compagnie Financière Lazard Frères SAS |  | France                 
|Lazard Frères Gestion                  |  | France                 
|Lazard Frères Banque SA                |  | France                 
|Maison Lazard SAS                      |  | France
### §254d. Dismissal on motion of action against individual entitled to immunity

Any action or proceeding brought against an individual who is entitled to immunity with respect to such action or proceeding under the Vienna Convention on Diplomatic Relations, under section 254b or 254c of this title, or under any other laws extending diplomatic privileges and immunities, shall be dismissed. Such immunity may be established upon motion or suggestion by or on behalf of the individual, or as otherwise permitted by law or applicable rules of procedure.

(Pub. L. 95–393, §5, Sept. 30, 1978, 92 Stat. 809.)

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date

Section effective at end of ninety-day period beginning on Sept. 30, 1978, see section 9 of Pub. L. 95–393, set out as a note under section 254a of this title.
#### B. B. Cole *et al.*v. George Milmine *et al.*

Gambling *contract—purchase of grain for future delivery.*Where wheat is, in fact, purchased by the plaintiff for the defendant, upon contract between them, the fact that it is to be delivered at a future day does not bring the transaction within the prohibition of the statute in relation to gambling contracts.

Appeal from the Circuit Court of Champaign county; the Hon. C. B. Smith, Judge, presiding.

Mr. S. F. White, and Mr. J. O. Cunningham, for the appellants.

Mr. Thomas J. Smith, for the appellees.

Mr. Justice Scott

delivered the opinion of the Court:

This action was brought on two promissory notes given in settlement of a deal in wheat between the parties, and the defense sought to be made is, that it was in the nature of a gambling transaction, and hence void under our statute.

That some slight errors occurred on the trial, both in the admission of evidence and in the giving of instructions, is apparent, but it is so clearly proven the notes in suit were given for losses on wheat actually bought by plaintiffs for defendants, that we can not believe the slight errors complained of tended, in any degree, to produce the verdict that was rendered. The evidence is, the wheat was, in fact, purchased and paid for on account of defendants, and the fact it was to be *350delivered at a future day agreed upon did not bring it within the prohibition of the statute. Defendants could have had the wheat delivered to them if they had so elected. The fact defendants gave their notes in settlement is a concession the wheat was bought for them, and if not illegal, the contract was binding upon them. That it was a *bona fide*purchase is proven by a great preponderance of the evidence.

The judgment will be affirmed.

*Judgment affirmed.*
###### Editorial Note on Part 416

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 416 appear at 68 FR 53509, Sept. 11, 2003.

#### § 416.543 Underpayments—applied to reduce overpayments.

We apply any underpayment due an individual to reduce any overpayment to that individual that we determine to exist (see § 416.558) for a different period, unless we have waived recovery of the overpayment under the provisions of §§ 416.550 through 416.556. Similarly, when an underpaid recipient dies, we first apply any amounts due the deceased recipient that would be payable to a survivor under § 416.542(b) against any overpayment to the survivor unless we have waived recovery of such overpayment under the provisions of §§ 416.550 through 416.556.

# Example:

A disabled child, eligible for payments under title XVI, and his parent, also an eligible individual receiving payments under title XVI, were living together. The disabled child dies at a time when he was underpaid $100. The deceased child's underpaid benefit is payable to the surviving parent. However, since the parent must repay an SSI overpayment of $225 on his own record, the $100 underpayment will be applied to reduce the parent's own overpayment to $125.

[58 FR 52913, Oct. 13, 1993]
### SUBCHAPTER IV—OTHER FEDERAL PROGRAMS
JOSEPH MICHAEL DAVIS,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellee.

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO 

FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND 

DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED

CASE NO. 1D14-5068

_____________________________/

Opinion filed March 2, 2015.

An appeal from an order of the Circuit Court for Escambia County.

T. Michael Jones, Judge.

Joseph Michael Davis, pro se, Appellant.

No appearance for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

DISMISSED. Hall v. State, 117 So. 3d 478 (Fla. 1st DCA 2013).

WOLF, MAKAR, and OSTERHAUS, JJ., CONCUR.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

DAY ELEV

 969.92

 970.93

 971.67

 972.53

 973.31

 973.97

 974.65

 975.33

 976.06

 976.60

 977.14

 977.53

 977.81

 978.20

 978.47

 978.68

 978.94

 979.08

 979.17

 979.22

 979.41

 979.39

 979.45

 979.55

 979.62

 979.63

 979.64

 979.66

 979.65

 979.63

 2,224.6

 2,243.3

 2,257.1

 2,273.1

 2,287.8

 2,300.2

 2,313.1

 2,326.0

 2,339.9

 2,350.2

 2,360.6

 2,368.1

 2,373.5

 2,381.0

 2,386.3

 2,390.3

 2,395.4

 2,398.1

 2,399.8

 2,400.8

 2,404.5

 2,404.1

 2,405.3

 2,407.3

 2,408.6

 2,408.8

 2,409.0

 2,409.4

 2,409.2

 2,408.8

STORAGE

+25.9

+18.7

+13.8

+16.1

+14.6

+12.4

+12.9

+12.9

+13.9

+10.3

+10.4

+7.5

+5.4

+7.5

+5.2

+4.1

+5.0

+2.7

+1.8

+1.0

+3.7

-0.4

+1.2

+1.9

+1.4

+0.2

+0.2

+0.4

-0.2

-0.4

CHANGE

 14,192

 11,307

 9,032

 9,119

 7,874

 7,414

 7,809

 7,282

 7,933

 6,720

 6,913

 5,251

 5,535

 6,091

 5,421

 4,811

 5,212

 4,957

 4,343

 4,279

 5,536

 3,605

 3,908

 4,108

 4,444

 3,272

 3,754

 3,623

 3,659

 3,763

INFLOW

 1,127

 1,854

 2,037

 1,013

 478

 1,066

 1,235

 660

 808

 1,398

 1,567

 1,379

 2,669

 2,150

 2,636

 2,618

 2,559

 3,454

 3,288

 3,657

 3,556

 3,773

 3,147

 3,056

 3,734

 3,157

 3,616

 3,397

 3,665

 3,828

POWER

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

SPILL

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

OUTLET

 11

 33

 55

 6

 17

 83

 84

 112

 112

 107

 124

 85

 147

 142

 148

 142

 114

 131

 171

 131

 114

 29

 172

 69

 23

 17

 40

 29

 92

 132

C.F.S.

 .02

 .06

 .10

 .01

 .03

 .15

 .15

 .20

 .20

 .19

 .22

 .15

 .26

 .25

 .26

 .25

 .20

 .23

 .30

 .23

 .20

 .05

 .30

 .12

 .04

 .03

 .07

 .05

 .16

 .23

INCHES

 .95

 .73

 .00

 .02

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .03

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .03

 .00

 .00

 .03

 .22

 .11

 .06

 .00

 .00

PRECIP

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

APRIL 2014 SHASTA LAKE DAILY OPERATIONS RUN DATE: June 6, 2014

IN LAKE

EVAPORATION

INCHES

C.F.S.

COMPUTED*

1000 ACRE-FEET

RELEASE - C.F.S.

RIVER

TOTALS +210.1 181,167 72,582 0 0 2,672 4.71 2.18

ACRE-FEET +210,100 359,345 143,966 0 0 5,300

COMMENTS:

* COMPUTED INFLOW IS THE SUM OF CHANGE IN STORAGE, RELEASES AND EVAPORATION.

SUMMARY

RELEASE (ACRE-FEET)

POWER 143,966

SPILL 0

OUTLET

TOTAL

 0

 143,966

PRECIPITATION

THIS MONTH =

TO DATE =

 2.18

JULY 1, 2013 31.92

 2,198.7

Table 3
### §337. Proceedings in name of United States; provision as to subpoenas

(a) Except as provided in subsection (b), all such proceedings for the enforcement, or to restrain violations, of this chapter shall be by and in the name of the United States. Subpoenas for witnesses who are required to attend a court of the United States, in any district, may run into any other district in any proceeding under this section.

(b)(1) A State may bring in its own name and within its jurisdiction proceedings for the civil enforcement, or to restrain violations, of section 341, 343(b), 343(c), 343(d), 343(e), 343(f), 343(g), 343(h), 343(i), 343(k), 343(q), or 343(r) of this title if the food that is the subject of the proceedings is located in the State.

(2) No proceeding may be commenced by a State under paragraph (1)—

(A) before 30 days after the State has given notice to the Secretary that the State intends to bring such proceeding,

(B) before 90 days after the State has given notice to the Secretary of such intent if the Secretary has, within such 30 days, commenced an informal or formal enforcement action pertaining to the food which would be the subject of such proceeding, or

(C) if the Secretary is diligently prosecuting a proceeding in court pertaining to such food, has settled such proceeding, or has settled the informal or formal enforcement action pertaining to such food.

In any court proceeding described in subparagraph (C), a State may intervene as a matter of right.

(June 25, 1938, ch. 675, §310, formerly §307, 52 Stat. 1046; Sept. 3, 1954, ch. 1263, §37, 68 Stat. 1239; Pub. L. 101–535, §4, Nov. 8, 1990, 104 Stat. 2362; renumbered §310, Pub. L. 102–282, §2, May 13, 1992, 106 Stat. 150.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

1990—Pub. L. 101–535 substituted "(a) Except as provided in subsection (b), all" for "All" and "any proceeding under this section" for "any such proceeding" and added subsec. (b).

1954—Act Sept. 3, 1954, struck out reference to section 654 of title 28.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date of 1990 Amendment

Amendment by Pub. L. 101–535 effective 24 months after Nov. 8, 1990, except that such amendment effective Dec. 31, 1993, with respect to dietary supplements of vitamins, minerals, herbs, or other similar nutritional substances, see section 10(a)(1)(C) of Pub. L. 101–535, set out as a note under section 343 of this title.

#### Construction of Amendments by Pub. L. 101–535

Amendments by Pub. L. 101–535 not to be construed to alter authority of Secretary of Health and Human Services and Secretary of Agriculture under the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (21 U.S.C. 301 et seq.), the Federal Meat Inspection Act (21 U.S.C. 601 et seq.), the Poultry Products Inspection Act (21 U.S.C. 451 et seq.), and the Egg Products Inspection Act (21 U.S.C. 1031 et seq.), see section 9 of Pub. L. 101–535, set out as a note under section 343 of this title.
#### § 10.221 How is a claim for COP controverted?

When the employer stops an employee's pay for one of the reasons cited in § 10.220, the employer must controvert the claim for COP on Form CA-1, explaining in detail the basis for the refusal. The final determination on entitlement to COP always rests with OWCP.
#### In the Matter of Harold A. Stein et al., Copartners under the Name of H. A. Stein Motor Company, Respondents-Appellants, against F. G. Doran, Defendant, and First National Bank in Yonkers, Appellant-Respondent.

Present—Close, P. J., Hagarty, Carswell, Taylor and Lewis, JJ. [See *post,*p. 855.]
# C_2016065EN.01020001.xml

| 19.2.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 65/200 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

19.2.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 65/200

---

P7_TA(2013)0252

Appointment of a member of the Court of Auditors

European Parliament decision of 12 June 2013 on the nomination of George Pufan as a Member of the Court of Auditors (C7-0115/2013 — 2013/0805(NLE))

(Consultation)

(2016/C 065/37)

The European Parliament,

The European Parliament

| — | having regard to Article 286(2) of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, pursuant to which the Council consulted Parliament (C7-0115/2013), |
| --- | --- |

—

having regard to Article 286(2) of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, pursuant to which the Council consulted Parliament (C7-0115/2013),

| — | having regard to Rule 108 of its Rules of Procedure, |
| --- | --- |

—

having regard to Rule 108 of its Rules of Procedure,

| — | having regard to the report of the Committee on Budgetary Control (A7-0181/2013), |
| --- | --- |

—

having regard to the report of the Committee on Budgetary Control (A7-0181/2013),

| A. | whereas Parliament’s Committee on Budgetary Control proceeded to evaluate the credentials of the nominee, in particular in view of the requirements laid down in Article 286(1) of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union; |
| --- | --- |

A.

whereas Parliament’s Committee on Budgetary Control proceeded to evaluate the credentials of the nominee, in particular in view of the requirements laid down in Article 286(1) of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union;

| B. | whereas at its meeting of 27 May 2013, the Committee on Budgetary Control heard the Council’s nominee for membership of the Court of Auditors; |
| --- | --- |

B.

whereas at its meeting of 27 May 2013, the Committee on Budgetary Control heard the Council’s nominee for membership of the Court of Auditors;

| 1. | Delivers a favourable opinion on the Council’s nomination of George Pufan as a Member of the Court of Auditors; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Delivers a favourable opinion on the Council’s nomination of George Pufan as a Member of the Court of Auditors;

| 2. | Instructs its President to forward this decision to the Council and, for information, the Court of Auditors, the other institutions of the European Union and the audit institutions of the Member States. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Instructs its President to forward this decision to the Council and, for information, the Court of Auditors, the other institutions of the European Union and the audit institutions of the Member States.

---
Exhibit 32.1
 
 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
 SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
 
 Each of the undersigned hereby certifies, in his capacity as an officer of Sino Gas International Holdings, Inc. (the “Company”), for the purposes of 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of his knowledge:
 
 (1)  The Annual Report of the Company on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2010 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
 
 (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
 
 Date: March 31, 2011
 
 /s/ Yuchuan LiuYuchuan LiuChief Executive Officer(Principal Executive Officer)/s/ Yugang ZhangYugang ZhangChief Financial Officer(Principal Accounting and Financial Officer)
## In the

Court of Appeals

Second Appellate District of Texas

at Fort Worth

No. 02

- 23

- 00394

- CV

N ORCO C ORPORATION

, Appellant

V

.

MMG C ONTRACTORS

, LLC , Appellee §

§

§

§ On Appeal from the 96th District

Court

of Tar r ant County ( 096

- 301013

- 18 )

June 13

, 2024

Memorandum Opinion by Chief Justice

Sudderth

JUDGMENT

This court has considered the record on appeal in this case and holds that there

was no error in the trial court’s judgment. It is ordered that the judgme n t of the trial

court is affirmed.

It is further ordered that Norco Corpor ation shall pay all costs of this appeal,

for which let execution issue.

SECOND DISTRICT COURT OF APPEALS

By /s/ Bonnie Sudderth

Chief Justice Bonnie Suddert h
Editorial Note on Part 416
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 416 appear at 68 FR 53509, Sept. 11, 2003.

§ 416.601 Introduction. ( a ) *Explanation of representative payment.* This subpart explains the principles and procedures that we follow in determining whether to make representative payment and in selecting a representative payee. It also explains the responsibilities that a representative payee has concerning the use of the funds he or she receives on behalf of a beneficiary. A representative payee may be either a person or an organization selected by us to receive benefits on behalf of a beneficiary. A representative payee will be selected if we believe that the interest of a beneficiary will be served by representative payment rather than direct payment of benefits. Generally, we appoint a representative payee if we have determined that the beneficiary is not able to manage or direct the management of benefit payments in his or her own interest.
( b ) *Policy used to determine whether to make representative payment.* ( 1 ) Our policy is that every beneficiary has the right to manage his or her own benefits. However, some beneficiaries due to a mental or physical condition or due to their youth may be unable to do so. Under these circumstances, we may determine that the interests of the beneficiary would be better served if we certified benefit payments to another person as a representative payee. However, we must select a representative payee for an individual who is eligible for benefits solely on the basis of disability if drug addiction or alcoholism is a contributing factor material to the determination of disability.
( 2 ) If we determine that representative payment is in the interest of a beneficiary, we will appoint a representative payee. We may appoint a representative payee even if the beneficiary is a legally competent individual. If the beneficiary is a legally incompetent individual, we may appoint the legal guardian or some other person as a representative payee.
( 3 ) If payment is being made directly to a beneficiary and a question arises concerning his or her ability to manage or direct the management of benefit payments, we will, if the beneficiary is 18 years old or older and has not been adjudged legally incompetent, continue to pay the beneficiary until we make a determination about his or her ability to manage or direct the management of benefit payments and the selection of a representative payee.
[47 FR 30475, July 14, 1982, as amended at 60 FR 8150, Feb. 10, 1995]
# Table B1
### D ISTRICT 

### C OURT 

### O F 

### A PPEAL 

### O F 

### T HE 

### S TATE 

### O F 

### F LORIDA

F OURTH D ISTRICT

N.J.G., a child

, Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA

, Appellee

.

No. 4D 18

- 1665

[ February 6, 2019 ]

Appeal from the Circuit Court for the Nineteenth Judicial Circuit, St. Lucie County ; Charles A. Schwab , Judge; L.T. Case No s

. 2017CJ000909 A, 2017CJ000822 A and 2017CJ000821.

Carey Haughwout, Public Defender, and Virginia Murphy, Assistant Public Defender, West Palm Beach, for appellant.

No appearance for appellee.

P ER C URIAM

.

In this Anders 1 appeal we affirm the finding of guilt, the adjudication of delinquency, and the sentencing, but remand for the trial court to correct the delinquency disposition orders to include the maximum penalty defined by statute and to specify the amount of time appellant served in secure detention before disposition. See Fla. R. Juv. P. 8.115(d)

.

Affirmed and remanded.

M AY
, L EVINE and K LINGENSMITH , JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing

.

1 Anders v. California , 386 U.S. 738 (1967).
Management Themes Applied to Idaho Roadless Areas

Wild Land Recreation

Primitive

Backcountry/Restoration

General Forest , Rangeland and Grassland

Special Areas of Historic or Tribal Significance

Forest Plan Special Areas

Wilderness

National Forest System Lands

(Other ownership is not displayed)

Gospel-Hump Wilderness

Frank Church-River of No Return Wilderness

Hells Canyon

Needles

Secesh

Snowbank

French Creek

Caton Lake

Rapid River

Patrick Butte

Cuddy Mountain

Cottontail Point/Pilot Peak

Council Mountain

Hells Canyon/Seven Devils Scenic

Meadow Creek

Sugar Mountain

Horse Heaven

Chimney Rock

Sheep Gulch

Crystal Mountain

Indian Creek

Poison Creek

Placer Creek

Smith Creek

Big Creek Fringe

£¤95

£¤30

£¤30

¬«71

¬«14

¬«55

¬«21

Ola

Mesa

Lardo

Dixie

McCall

Cuprum

Warren

Lucile

Cascade

Council

Meadows

Midvale

Pollock

Riggins

Donnelly

Burgdorf

Elk City

Cambridge

Lake Fork

Fruitvale

Big Creek

White Bird

New Meadows

Smiths Ferry

Indian Valley

Red River Hot Springs

Payette Idaho Roadless Rule Management Themes

8 4 0 8 I Miles

The USDA Forest Service uses the most current and complete

data available. GIS Data and product accuracy may vary.

Using GIS products for puposes other than those for which they

were intended may yield inaccurate or misleading results.

The USDA Forest Service reserves the right to correct, update,

modify, or replace GIS products without notification.
[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 75 (Tuesday, April 19, 2011)]
[Notices]
[Page 21931]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2011-9537]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

RAILROAD RETIREMENT BOARD


Sunshine Act; Notice of Public Meeting

    Notice is hereby given that the Railroad Retirement Board will hold 
a meeting on April 27, 2011, 10 a.m. at the Board's meeting room on the 
8th floor of its headquarters building, 844 North Rush Street, Chicago, 
Illinois 60611. The agenda for this meeting follows:

Executive Committee Reports

    The entire meeting will be open to the public. The person to 
contact for more information is Beatrice Ezerski, Secretary to the 
Board, Phone No. 312-751-4920.

    Dated: April 14, 2011.
Beatrice Ezerski,
Secretary to the Board.
[FR Doc. 2011-9537 Filed 4-15-11; 11:15 am]
BILLING CODE 7905-01-P
#### Town of Ripley, Appellant, v. State of New York, Respondent.

(Claim No. 26606.)

Present — Crosby, P. J., Cunningham, Taylor, Harris and McCurn, JJ.
### §§1801 to 1804. Repealed. Pub. L. 109–469, title V, §501(b), Dec. 29, 2006, 120 Stat. 3533

Section 1801, Pub. L. 105–277, div. D, title I, §102, Oct. 21, 1998, 112 Stat. 2681–752, related to requirement to conduct national media campaign.

Section 1802, Pub. L. 105–277, div. D, title I, §103, Oct. 21, 1998, 112 Stat. 2681–752, related to use of funds.

Section 1803, Pub. L. 105–277, div. D, title I, §104, Oct. 21, 1998, 112 Stat. 2681–753, related to reports to Congress.

Section 1804, Pub. L. 105–277, div. D, title I, §105, Oct. 21, 1998, 112 Stat. 2681–753, related to authorization of appropriations.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Short Title

Pub. L. 105–277, div. D, §1(a), Oct. 21, 1998, 112 Stat. 2681–751, provided that: "This division [enacting this chapter and section 7144 of Title 20, Education, and enacting provisions set out as notes under this section, section 1703 of this title, section 6301 of Title 20, and section 3751 of Title 42, The Public Health and Welfare] may be cited as the 'Drug Demand Reduction Act'."

Pub. L. 105–277, div. D, title I, §101, Oct. 21, 1998, 112 Stat. 2681–752, which provided that subtitle A (§§101–105) of title I of div. D of Pub. L. 105–277, enacting this chapter, was to be cited as the "Drug-Free Media Campaign Act of 1998", was repealed by Pub. L. 109–469, title V, §501(b), Dec. 29, 2006, 120 Stat. 3533.