alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 422.837 Contracting with private collection contractors and with entities that locate and recover unclaimed assets. ( a ) Subject to the provisions of paragraph (b) of this section, we may contract with private collection contractors to recover delinquent debts, if: ( 1 ) We retain the authority to resolve disputes, compromise debts, suspend or terminate collection action, and, as appropriate, to refer debts to the Department of Justice for review and litigation;
( 2 ) The private collection contractor is not allowed to offer the debtor, as an incentive for payment, the opportunity to pay the debt less the private collection contractor's fee, unless we have granted such authority prior to the offer;
( 3 ) The contract provides that the private collection contractor is subject to the Privacy Act of 1974 to the extent specified in 5 U.S.C. 552a(m) and to applicable Federal and State laws and regulations pertaining to debt collection practices, including, but not limited, to the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act, 15 U.S.C. 1692; and
( 4 ) The private collection contractor is required to account for all amounts collected.
( b ) We will use government-wide debt collection contracts to obtain debt collection services provided by private collection contractors. However, we may refer debts to private collection contractors pursuant to a contract between the agency and the private collection contractor only if such debts are not subject to the requirement to transfer debts to the Treasury for debt collection under 31 U.S.C. 3711(g) and 31 CFR 285.12(e).
( c ) Debts arising under the Social Security Act (which can be collected by private collection contractors only by Department of the Treasury (Treasury) after the debt has been referred to Treasury for collection) are excluded from this section.
( d ) We may fund private collection contractor contracts in accordance with 31 U.S.C. 3718(d) or as otherwise permitted by law. A contract under paragraph (a) of this section may provide that the fee a private collection contractor charges the agency for collecting the debt is payable from the amounts collected.
( e ) We may enter into contracts for locating and recovering assets of the United States, including unclaimed assets. However, before entering into a contract to recover assets of the United States that may be held by a State Government or financial institution, we must establish procedures that are acceptable to the Secretary of the Treasury.
( f ) We enter into contracts for debtor asset and income search reports. In accordance with 31 U.S.C. 3718(d), such contracts may provide that the fee a contractor charges the agency for such services may be payable from the amounts recovered unless otherwise prohibited by statute.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

DAY ELEV

 1,060.05

 1,059.94

 1,059.82

 1,059.76

 1,059.64

 1,059.50

 1,059.27

 1,059.21

 1,059.18

 1,059.02

 1,058.83

 1,058.69

 1,058.72

 1,058.58

 1,058.47

 1,058.38

 1,058.27

 1,058.08

 1,057.90

 1,057.69

 1,057.40

 1,057.13

 1,056.95

 1,056.69

 1,056.56

 1,056.22

 1,055.98

 1,055.73

 1,055.52

 1,055.29

 4,348.2

 4,345.0

 4,341.5

 4,339.8

 4,336.3

 4,332.2

 4,325.6

 4,323.8

 4,323.0

 4,318.3

 4,312.9

 4,308.8

 4,309.7

 4,305.7

 4,302.5

 4,299.9

 4,296.7

 4,291.2

 4,286.1

 4,280.0

 4,271.7

 4,264.0

 4,258.8

 4,251.4

 4,247.7

 4,238.0

 4,231.1

 4,224.0

 4,218.0

 4,211.5

STORAGE

-4.9

-3.2

-3.5

-1.7

-3.5

-4.1

-6.7

-1.7

-0.9

-4.6

-5.5

-4.0

+0.9

-4.0

-3.2

-2.6

-3.2

-5.5

-5.2

-6.0

-8.3

-7.7

-5.2

-7.4

-3.7

-9.7

-6.9

-7.1

-6.0

-6.5

CHANGE

 6,396

 6,917

 7,376

 8,054

 8,204

 6,997

 5,604

 6,915

 7,358

 5,151

 5,330

 5,875

 7,506

 5,489

 6,276

 5,763

 5,427

 5,964

 5,597

 5,613

 5,114

 4,926

 6,223

 4,890

 5,717

 3,989

 4,809

 5,375

 5,603

 5,569

INFLOW

 8,655

 8,250

 8,864

 8,675

 9,573

 8,769

 8,682

 7,706

 7,754

 7,360

 8,007

 7,800

 6,926

 7,311

 7,596

 6,784

 6,730

 8,413

 7,878

 8,356

 8,973

 8,529

 8,453

 8,255

 7,278

 8,557

 7,987

 8,599

 8,237

 8,466

POWER

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

SPILL

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

OUTLET

 221

 272

 264

 255

 383

 272

 280

 85

 42

 127

 85

 110

 144

 212

 279

 287

 296

 312

 329

 295

 337

 303

 370

 378

 310

 327

 276

 359

 376

 400

C.F.S.

 .26

 .32

 .31

 .30

 .45

 .32

 .33

 .10

 .05

 .15

 .10

 .13

 .17

 .25

 .33

 .34

 .35

 .37

 .39

 .35

 .40

 .36

 .44

 .45

 .37

 .39

 .33

 .43

 .45

 .48

INCHES

 .02

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .37

 .19

 .03

 .10

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

PRECIP

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

JUNE 2017 SHASTA LAKE DAILY OPERATIONS RUN DATE: August 4, 2017

IN LAKE

EVAPORATION

INCHES

C.F.S.

COMPUTED*

1000 ACRE-FEET

RELEASE - C.F.S.

RIVER

TOTALS -141.6 180,027 243,423 0 0 7,986 9.47 .71

ACRE-FEET -141,600 357,084 482,830 0 0 15,840

COMMENTS:

* COMPUTED INFLOW IS THE SUM OF CHANGE IN STORAGE, RELEASES AND EVAPORATION.

SUMMARY

RELEASE (ACRE-FEET)

POWER 482,830

SPILL 0

OUTLET

TOTAL

 0

 482,830

PRECIPITATION

THIS MONTH =

TO DATE =

 .71

JULY 1, 2016 99.34

 4,353.1

Table 3

OCT 1, 2016 TO DATE = 99.34
Page 1 of 2 UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20460

OFFICE OF
CHEMICAL SAFETY AND
POLLUTION PREVENTION

MEMORANDUM

DATE: June 30 , 2010

SUBJECT: Transmittal memo of amended charge question for the FIFRA Scientific Advisory

Panel meeting on “ Comparative Adult and Juvenile Sensitivity Toxicity Protocols for Pyrethroids ” to be held July 23, 2010

.

FROM: Edward Scollon , Ph.D.

Toxicologist Health Effects Division (7509P)

THROUGH: Tina Levine, Ph.D.

Dire ctor Health Effects Division (7509P)

TO: Sharlene Matten, Ph.D.

Designated Federal Official FIFRA Scientific Advisory Panel Office of Science Coordination and Policy (7201M)

T his memo is an addendum to the original transmittal document da ted July 21, 2010. Due to
recent communications with the P yrethrin and Pyrethroid Working Group , the Agency has new
information which affects the direction and cl arity of charge question 2.2 which addresses the
use of hepatocytes in the PBPK models. This document will be available in the docket EPA

- HQ

OPP

- 2010

- 0378 at www.regulations.gov

.

The revised question reads:

2.2 Microsomal incubation studies have been used to inform the pyrethroid PBPK models developed by ORD (Mirfazaelian et al. 2006; Scollon et al. 2009; Godin et al. 2010; Tornero

- Velez et al. 2010; Tornero

- Velez in prep. ) . The PPTWG has proposed to use intact hepatocytes instead because they may provide a better prediction of metabolism compared to mi crocellular fractionsPage 2 of 2

(Hewitt et al. 2007) . Additionally, the PPTWG is proposing to compare the clearance activity of human hepatocytes and microsomal fractions for several age groups. However, the Agency notes that there are a limited number of human hepatocyte samples available to inform the PBPK model. Pooled human microsomes are available representing larger segment s of the population relative to hepatocyte availability. The Working Group suggests characterization of the hepatocytes (i.e., cypP450 and esterase composition) and establishing a relationship between hepatocytes and microsomal fraction activities may red uce model uncertainty in light of limited data. Please comment on the strengths and weaknesses of the PPTWG proposal to use hepatocytes in the PBPK effort
, including the potential for hepatocyte s to decrease uncertainty of model predictions in light of li mited data.
#### In the Matter of the Appointment of Three Trustees of the City and County Hall for the Use of the City of Buffalo and the County of Erie, in the Place of Wadsworth J. Zittel and Henry C. Steul, Whose Terms of Office Expire May 4, 1914, and Henry V. Bisgood, Deceased, whose Term of Office Would Have Expired May 2, 1918.

Wadsworth J. Zittel and Henry C. Steul appointed, each for the term of six years from the 4th day of May, 1914, to succeed themselves. Howard Bissell, Democrat, residing at 27 Middlesex road, Buffalo, appointed to take the place of Henry V. Bisgood, deceased, for the unexpired portion of said term, ending May 2, 1918.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

DAY HIGH

 238

 229

 226

 228

 234

 236

 240

 245

 249

 251

 252

 251

 250

 246

 249

 247

 247

 255

 254

 253

 253

 257

 258

 259

 259

 246

 244

 248

 153

 170

 182

 195

 205

 210

 214

 220

 226

 230

 230

 223

 204

 205

 206

 212

 215

 217

 217

 212

 214

 205

 185

 175

 172

 173

 177

 192

 195

 197

 203

 214

 222

 228

 233

 239

 242

 245

 245

 242

 233

 228

 228

 229

 231

 235

 235

 237

 234

 237

 231

 226

 224

 213

 214

 221

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

FEBRUARY 2005 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: March 4, 2005

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

SAN ANDREAS ON THE SAN JOAQUIN RIVER
### §290g–25. Fifteenth replenishment

#### (a) In general

The United States Governor of the Fund is authorized to contribute on behalf of the United States $513,900,000 to the fifteenth replenishment of the resources of the Fund, subject to obtaining the necessary appropriations.

#### (b) Authorization of appropriations

In order to pay for the United States contribution provided for in subsection (a), there are authorized to be appropriated, without fiscal year limitation, $513,900,000 for payment by the Secretary of the Treasury.

(Pub. L. 94–302, title II, §226, as added Pub. L. 116–136, div. B, title XI, §21012(b)(4), Mar. 27, 2020, 134 Stat. 594.)
### §2291–5. Provision of nonlethal equipment to foreign law enforcement organizations for cooperative illicit narcotics control activities

#### (a) In general

(1) Subject to paragraph (2), the Administrator of the Drug Enforcement Administration, in consultation with the Secretary of State, may transfer or lease each year nonlethal equipment to foreign law enforcement organizations for the purpose of establishing and carrying out cooperative illicit narcotics control activities.

(2)(A) The Administrator may transfer or lease equipment under paragraph (1) only if the equipment is not designated as a munitions item or controlled on the United States Munitions List pursuant to section 2778 of this title.

(B) The value of each piece of equipment transferred or leased under paragraph (1) may not exceed $100,000.

#### (b) Additional requirement

The Administrator shall provide for the maintenance and repair of any equipment transferred or leased under subsection (a).

#### (c) Notification requirement

Before the export of any item authorized for transfer under subsection (a), the Administrator shall provide written notice to the Committee on Foreign Relations of the Senate and the Committee on International Relations of the House of Representatives in accordance with the procedures applicable to reprogramming notifications under section 2394–1 of this title.

#### (d) Sense of Congress

It is the sense of Congress that—

(1) all United States law enforcement personnel serving in Mexico should be accredited the same status under the Vienna Convention on Diplomatic Immunity as other diplomatic personnel serving at United States posts in Mexico; and

(2) all Mexican narcotics law enforcement personnel serving in the United States should be accorded the same diplomatic status as Drug Enforcement Administration personnel serving in Mexico.

(Pub. L. 105–277, div. C, title VIII, §843, Oct. 21, 1998, 112 Stat. 2681–704.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section was enacted as part of the Western Hemisphere Drug Elimination Act, and also as part of the Omnibus Consolidated and Emergency Supplemental Appropriations Act, 1999, and not as part of the Foreign Assistance Act of 1961 which comprises this chapter.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Change of Name

Committee on International Relations of House of Representatives changed to Committee on Foreign Affairs of House of Representatives by House Resolution No. 6, One Hundred Tenth Congress, Jan. 5, 2007.
### §2688. Ambassadors; criteria regarding selection and confirmation

It is the sense of the Congress that the position of United States ambassador to a foreign country should be accorded to men and women possessing clearly demonstrated competence to perform ambassadorial duties. No individual should be accorded the position of United States ambassador to a foreign country primarily because of financial contributions to political campaigns.

(Aug. 1, 1956, ch. 841, title I, §18, as added Pub. L. 94–141, title I, §104, Nov. 29, 1975, 89 Stat. 757; renumbered title I, Pub. L. 97–241, title II, §202(a), Aug. 24, 1982, 96 Stat. 282.)
---

Exhibit 99.10

April 2, 2013

CONSENT OF JAMES TURNER

United States Securities and Exchange Commission

Gentlemen:

In connection with Silver Wheaton Corp.s (the Company)
Annual Report on Form 40-F for the year ended December 31, 2012 (the Annual
Report), I, James Turner, BSc (Hons) MSc CEng MIMMM, Senior Mineral Process
Engineer, Micon International Ltd., hereby consent to the inclusion in, or
incorporation by reference into, the Annual Report and the Companys
Registration Statement on Form S-8 (File No. 333-128128), of the following:

| | 1. | Technical Report on the Mineral Reserves and Mineral
      Resources of the Salobo Copper-Gold Mine Carajas, Pará State, Brazil,
      dated March 19, 2013.
| | -- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Yours truly,

/s/ James
TurnerJames Turner, BSc (Hons) MSc CEng MIMMM Senior Mineral Process
Engineer Micon International Ltd.

---
COURT OF APPEALS

SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS

FORT WORTH

NO. 02-12-00080-CR

Rex Earl Tucker a/k/a Rex Tucker

v.

The State of Texas

§

§

§

§

§

From the 432nd District Court

of Tarrant County (1177881D)

July 11, 2013

Per Curiam

(nfp)

JUDGMENT

This court has considered the record on appeal in this case and holds that 

there was no error in the trial court’s judgment. It is ordered that the judgment of 

the trial court is affirmed.

SECOND DISTRICT COURT OF APPEALS 

PER CURIAM
EXHIBIT 32.1



             CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER
                  PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

                        AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
            SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



     In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10 Q of First
Keystone Corporation (the "Corporation") for the period ended March
31, 2004, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the
"Report"), I, J. Gerald Bazewicz, President and CEO, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as added by Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:

    1.  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
        13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

    2.  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
        all material respects, the financial condition and results
        of operations of the Corporation as of and for the period
        covered by the Report.





                                  /s/ J. Gerald Bazewicz
                                  J. Gerald Bazewicz
                                  President and CEO


May 5, 2004


                                26
###### Editorial Note on Part 416

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 416 appear at 68 FR 53509, Sept. 11, 2003.

#### § 416.806 Expedited adjudication based on documentary evidence of age.

Where documentary evidence of age recorded at least 3 years before the application is filed, which reasonably supports an aged applicant's allegation as to his age, is submitted, payment of benefits may be initiated even though additional evidence of age may be required by §§ 416.801 through 416.805. The applicant will be advised that additional evidence is required and that, if it is subsequently established that the prior finding of age is incorrect, the applicant will be liable for refund of any overpayment he has received. If any of the evidence initially submitted tends to show that the age of the applicant or such other person does not correspond with the alleged age, no benefits will be paid until the evidence required by §§ 416.801 through 416.805 is submitted.
#### John Henry HACKER, Appellant, v. UNITED STATES of America, Appellee.

No. 14072.

United States Court of Appeals Ninth Circuit.

Sept. 15, 1954.

*576Harold Shire, Beverly Hills, Cal., Hayden C. Covington, Brooklyn, N. Y., for appellant.

Laughlih E. Waters, U.- S. Atty., Ray H. Kinnison, Manuel Real, Asst. U. S. Attys., Los Angeles, Cal., for appellee.

Before .STEPHENS, BONE and POPE, .Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

Hacker appeals from a judgment of conviction of refusal to submit to induction contrary' to the provisions of the Universal Military Training and Service Act, 50 U.S.C.A.Appendix, § 451 et seq. The facts in his case cannot be distinguished from those in Dickenson v. United States, 346 U.S. 389,. 74 S.Ct. 152. In the questionnaire filed with his local draft board he claimed classification as a minister of religion. He furnished the board a number of documents and affidavits tending to support this claim. Among these was a certificate of the Superintendent of Ministers and Evangelists of the Watchtower Bible and Tract Society that he was an ordained minister of that society, in the full-time ministry as a “pioneer”, and authorized to perform all the usual rites and ceremonies of Jehovah’s Witnesses. There was also an affidavit of all the members of his congregation that he was its only full-time minister. He disclosed that he had -a part-time secular job, driving a school .bus. This averaged about fifteen hours a week, and paid him only $640.40 per year. This work was done early in the mornings and late in the afternoons, and .extended only during the school months. However, he showed that he spent much time’in “missionary work”, making calls, in addition to his ministerial work preaching to his own congregation. His showing was that he was one of the few Jehovah’s Witnesses engaged in preaching full time. There was no evidence to the contrary.

We therefore hold, on the authority of the Dickenson case, that the denial of a ministerial exemption to appellant was without basis in fact.

The judgment is reversed.
**EXHIBIT 31.2**
**CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER CERTIFICATIONS**
I, James H. Moar, Chief Financial Officer, certify that:
1.      I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of IdentixIncorporated (the “registrant”); 2.      Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untruestatement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary tomake the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which suchstatements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered bythis quarterly report; 3.      Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financialinformation included in this quarterly report, fairly present in allmaterial respects the financial condition, results of operations and cashflows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in thisreport; 4.      The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible forestablishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (asdefined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) for the registrantand have:
        a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused suchdisclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, toensure that material information relating to the registrant, including itsconsolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within thoseentities, particularly during the period in which this quarterly report isbeing prepared;
        b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controlsand procedures and presented in this quarterly report our conclusions aboutthe effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the endof the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and
        c) disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internalcontrol over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s mostrecent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case ofan annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely tomaterially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting; and
5.      The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based onour most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting,to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’sboard of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):
        a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the designor operation of internal controls over financial reporting which arereasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record,process, summarize and report financial information; and
        b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management orother employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internalcontrol over financial reporting.     Date: May 17, 2004 By:  /s/ James H. Moar   James H. Moar   Chief Financial Officer
CERTIFICATE OF AMENDMENT
                                       OF
                          CERTIFICATE OF INCORPORATION
                                       OF
                                   SCOOP, INC.

          Pursuant to Section 242 of the Delaware General Corporation Law

          SCOOP,  INC.,  a  Delaware  corporation  (the  "Corporation"),  hereby
certifies as follows:

          FIRST:  The Certificate of  Incorporation of the Corporation was filed
in the Office of the  Secretary  of State of  Delaware  on October  11, 1996 and
amended on October 21, 1999.

          SECOND:  The Certificate of  Incorporation is hereby amended to change
the name of the  Corporation  by striking  Article FIRST of the  Certificate  of
Incorporation in its entirety and inserting the following new Article FIRST:

          "FIRST: The name of the corporation (hereinafter the "Corporation") is
     24Holdings Inc."

          THIRD:  This Amendment to the  Certificate of  Incorporation  was duly
adopted  by the  unanimous  written  consent  of the Board of  Directors  of the
Corporation  and by the written consent of the holder of a majority of the stock
of the Corporation  entitled to vote in accordance with Sections 141(f), 228 and
242 of the Delaware General Corporation Law.

          IN WITNESS  WHEREOF,  the Corporation  has caused this  Certificate of
Amendment of its  Certificate of  Incorporation  to be executed by its President
and Chief Executive Officer this 2nd day of April, 2001.



                                              /s/ Martin Clarke
                                              --------------------------
                                              Martin Clarke,
                                              President and Chief
                                              Executive Officer
#### § 200.3 Obtaining forms from the Railroad Retirement Board.

Forms used by the Board, including applications for benefits and informational publications, may be obtained from the Board's headquarters at 844 Rush Street, Chicago, Illinois 60611, and from local Board offices.

[63 FR 17326, Apr. 9, 1998]