alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 404.446 Definition of “substantial services” and “services.” ( a ) *General.* In general, the substantial services test will be applicable only in a grace year (including a termination grace year) as defined in § 404.435(c)(1). It is a test of whether, in view of all the services rendered by the individual and the surrounding circumstances, the individual reasonably can be considered retired in the month in question. In determining whether an individual has or has not performed substantial services in any month, the following factors are considered: ( 1 ) The amount of time the individual devoted to all trades and businesses;
( 2 ) The nature of the services rendered by the individual;
( 3 ) The extent and nature of the activity performed by the individual before he allegedly retired as compared with that performed thereafter;
( 4 ) The presence or absence of an adequately qualified paid manager, partner, or family member who manages the business;
( 5 ) The type of business establishment involved;
( 6 ) The amount of capital invested in the trade or business; and
( 7 ) The seasonal nature of the trade or business.
( b ) *Individual engaged in more than one trade or business.* When an individual, in any month, performs services in more than one trade or business, his services in all trades or businesses are considered together in determining whether he performed substantial services in self-employment in such month.
( c ) *Evidentiary requirements.* An individual who alleges that he did not render substantial services in any month, or months, shall submit detailed information about the operation of the trades or businesses, including the individual's activities in connection therewith. When requested to do so by the Administration, the individual shall also submit such additional statements, information, and other evidence as the Administration may consider necessary for a proper determination of whether the individual rendered substantial services in self-employment. Failure of the individual to submit the requested statements, information, and other evidence is a sufficient basis for a determination that the individual rendered substantial services in self-employment during the period in question.
[32 FR 19159, Dec. 20, 1967, as amended at 47 FR 46691, Oct. 20, 1982]
EXHIBIT 99.2



             CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER
                  PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350



     In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10Q of First
Keystone Corporation (the "Company") for the period ending March 31,
2003, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the
"Report"), I, David R. Saracino, Vice President and CFO, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as added by  Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

    1.  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
        13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

    2.  To my knowledge, the information contained in the Report
        fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
        condition and results of operations of the Company as of
        and for the period covered by the Report.






                                  /s/ David R. Saracino
                                  David R. Saracino
                                  Treasurer and CFO



May 9, 2003


                              25
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY

 2,350

 2,755

 2,619

 1,928

 2,417

 1,426

 2,602

 1,644

 2,143

 2,002

 2,670

 2,739

 3,210

 6,506

 5,763

 5,637

 4,974

 2,961

 2,755

 2,945

 2,996

 1,157

 696

 2,869

 7,352

 7,799

 10,943

 8,570

 10,040

 20,101

 17,742

 95,000

 92,483

 90,476

 88,440

 85,849

 83,853

 81,015

 79,436

 77,026

 75,211

 73,352

 72,221

 71,212

 70,701

 73,347

 75,154

 76,752

 77,639

 76,570

 75,359

 74,389

 73,516

 70,939

 68,053

 67,376

 70,992

 74,851

 81,504

 85,571

 90,830

 105,385

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

OCTOBER 2016 SHASTA LAKE FLOOD CONTROL REQUIREMENTS RUN DATE: December 28, 2016

 97,350

 95,238

 93,095

 90,368

 88,266

 85,279

 83,617

 81,080

 79,169

 77,213

 76,022

 74,960

 74,422

 77,207

 79,110

 80,791

 81,726

 80,600

 79,325

 78,304

 77,385

 74,673

 71,635

 70,922

 74,728

 78,791

 85,794

 90,074

 95,611

 110,931

 123,127

 4,531,000

 4,509,000

 4,488,000

 4,467,000

 4,445,000

 4,424,000

 4,403,000

 4,382,000

 4,360,000

 4,339,000

 4,318,000

 4,296,000

 4,275,000

 4,254,000

 4,232,000

 4,211,000

 4,190,000

 4,168,000

 4,147,000

 4,126,000

 4,104,000

 4,083,000

 4,062,000

 4,041,000

 4,019,000

 3,998,000

 3,977,000

 3,955,000

 3,934,000

 3,913,000

 3,891,000

 SHASTA 

INFLOW 

C. F. S. 

 PREV DAY

 F. C. PAR 

 (COL 3) 

 X .95 

 F. C. 

 PARAM 

 (COLS. 

 1 + 2 ) 

 .0356* 

 X DAYS 

 12/23 THRU

3/20 

 530,000

 MINUS 

 F. C. 

 PARAM

 (COL 3)

 COLS 

 4 X 5 

 F. C. 

 RESERV 

 (1,300,000 

 - COL 6 ) 

 MINUS 

 14,943 

 PER DAY

 AFTER 

 3/20 

 ADJUSTED 

 F. C. 

 RESERV 

 (7-8) 

 PERM 

 STORAGE 

 COMMENTS:

 * LEAP YEAR CONSTANT = .0352 

 CONSTANT .0356 = 1,300,000 / (TOTAL DAYS X (530,000 - 110,000 ) )

 IF COL 3 IS GREATER THAN 530,000 OR LESS THAN 110,000 USE THOSE VALUES FOR COL 3 INSTEAD OF THE COMPUTED VALUE. 

 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 

 100,000
###### Editorial Note on Part 416

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 416 appear at 68 FR 53509, Sept. 11, 2003.

#### § 416.804 Certified copy in lieu of original.

In lieu of the original of any record, except a Bible or other family record, there may be submitted as evidence of age a copy of such record or a statement as to the date of birth shown by such record, which has been duly certified (see § 404.701(g) of this chapter).
EXHIBIT
32.2





CERTIFICATION
OF PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER


PURSUANT
TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350





AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q/A of First Keystone
Corporation (the “Corporation”) for the period ended September 30, 2010, as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “Report”), I, Diane C.A.
Rosler, Chief Financial Officer, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
added by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my
knowledge:





1.
            The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
and





2.
            The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Corporation as of and for the period covered by the
  Report.





/s/
      Diane C.A. RoslerDiane
      C.A. RoslerSenior
      Vice President and ChiefFinancial
Officer





December
16, 2010
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>The schedule contains summary financial information
extracted from Dean Witter Cornerstone II and is
qualified in its entirety by references to such financial
instruments.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          SEP-30-1995
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1995
<CASH>                                      29,545,248
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  201,545
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              30,201,040<F1>
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0
<BONDS>                                              0
<COMMON>                                             0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                30,201,040<F2>
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             8,554,233<F3>
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             2,683,013
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              5,871,220
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          5,871,220
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 5,871,220
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
<FN>
<F1>In addition to cash and receivables, total assets include net unrealized
loss on open contracts of $3,861,843.
<F2>Liabilities include redemptions payable of $232,104, accrued incentive
fees of $9,489, accrued management fees of $99,885 and common administrative
expenses payable of $81,314.
<F3>Total revenues includes realized trading revenue of $11,263,740, net
change in unrealized of ($3,861,843) and interest income of $1,152,336.
</FN>
        

</TABLE>
Electronically Filed Intermediate Court of Appeals CAAP-15-0000648 06-FEB-2020 07:59 AM
#### § 498.127 Judicial review.

Sections 1129 and 1140 of the Social Security Act authorize judicial review of any penalty and assessment, as applicable, that has become final. Judicial review may be sought by a respondent only in regard to a penalty and assessment, as applicable, with respect to which the respondent requested a hearing, unless the failure or neglect to urge such objection is excused by the court because of extraordinary circumstances.

[61 FR 18080, Apr. 24, 1996]
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 11-1710

LYNN ELLEN MENDES,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

v.

CHARLES BROWN; CHARLOTTE MECKLENBURG PUBLIC LIBRARY,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western

District of North Carolina, at Charlotte. Richard L. Voorhees, 

District Judge. (3:10-cv-00397-RLV-DCK)

Submitted: February 9, 2012 Decided: February 13, 2012

Before WILKINSON, AGEE, and FLOYD, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Lynn Ellen Mendes, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Lynn Ellen Mendes appeals the district court’s orders

dismissing her 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint as frivolous 

under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B) (2006), and denying 

reconsideration. We have reviewed the record and find no 

reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated 

by the district court. Mendes v. Brown, No. 3:10-cv-00397-RLVDCK (W.D.N.C. Nov. 19, 2010; Aug. 29, 2011). We dispense with 

oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are 

adequately presented in the materials before the court and 

argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED