alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
### §2026. Termination of authority and participation in Agency

In the event of an amendment to the Statute of the Agency being adopted in accordance with article XVIII–C of the Statute to which the Senate by formal vote shall refuse its advice and consent, upon notification by the Senate to the President of such refusal to advise and consent, all further authority under section 1 2021, 2022, 2023 and 2024 of this title, as amended, shall terminate: Provided, however, That the Secretary of State, under such regulations as the President shall promulgate, shall have the necessary authority to complete the prompt and orderly settlement of obligations and commitments to the Agency already incurred and pay salaries, allowances, travel expenses, and other expenses required for a prompt and orderly termination of United States participation in the Agency: And provided further, That the representative and the deputy representative of the United States to the Agency, and such other officers or employees representing the United States in the Agency, under such regulations as the President shall promulgate, shall retain their authority under this chapter for such time as may be necessary to complete the settlement of matters arising out of the United States participation in the Agency.

(Pub. L. 85–177, §8, Aug. 28, 1957, 71 Stat. 455.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

Article XVIII–C of the Statute, referred to in text, provides: "C. Amendments shall come into force for all members when: (i) Approved by the General Conference by a two-thirds majority of those present and voting after consideration of observations submitted by the Board of Governors on each proposed amendment, and (ii) Accepted by two-thirds of all the members in accordance with their respective constitutional processes. Acceptance by a member shall be effected by the deposit of an instrument of acceptance with the depositary Government referred to in paragraph C of Article XXI."

1 So in original. Probably should be "sections".
CENTRAL VALLEY OPERATIONS OFFICE

CHINOOK SALMON REPORT

June 2013

Note: Shaded area not verified with CDFW dat Preliminary Data - Subject to Change

Winter Run Chinook Salmon Estimated Loss (Incidental Take) Spring Run Chinook Salmon Estimated Loss (Incidental Take) 

Daily SWP Daily CVP Daily Combined Season Combined Daily SWP Daily CVP Daily Combined Season Combined Daily 

Tagged* No Tag Tagged* No Tag Tagged* No Tag Tagged* No Tag Tagged No Tag Tagged No Tag Tagged No Tag Tagged No Tag In C

DATE Estimated Estimated Estimated Estimated Estimated Estimated Estimated Estimated Estimated Estimated Estimated Estimated Estimated Estimated Estimated Estimated

Loss Loss Loss Loss Loss Loss Loss Loss Loss Loss Loss Loss Loss Loss Loss Loss

1-Jun-13 0000 0 0 595 727 0000 0 0 14 2,496 1,481 2-Jun-13 0000 0 0 595 727 0000 0 0 14 2,496 1,481 3-Jun-13 0000 0 0 595 727 0000 0 0 14 2,496 1,481 4-Jun-13 0000 0 0 595 727 0000 0 0 14 2,496 972 5-Jun-13 0000 0 0 595 727 0000 0 0 14 2,496 604 6-Jun-13 0000 0 0 595 727 0000 0 0 14 2,496 375 7-Jun-13 0000 0 0 595 727 0000 0 0 14 2,496 375 8-Jun-13 0000 0 0 595 727 0000 0 0 14 2,496 649 9-Jun-13 0000 0 0 595 727 0000 0 0 14 2,496 749 

10-Jun-13 0000 0 0 595 727 0000 0 0 14 2,496 750 

11-Jun-13 0000 0 0 595 727 0000 0 0 14 2,496 2,457 

12-Jun-13 0000 0 0 595 727 0000 0 0 14 2,496 2,425 

13-Jun-13 0000 0 0 595 727 0000 0 0 14 2,496 2,037 

14-Jun-13 0000 0 0 595 727 0000 0 0 14 2,496 1,964 

15-Jun-13 0000 0 0 595 727 0000 0 0 14 2,496 2,609 

16-Jun-13 0000 0 0 595 727 0000 0 0 14 2,496 2,101 

17-Jun-13 0000 0 0 595 727 0000 0 0 14 2,496 1,617 

18-Jun-13 0000 0 0 595 727 0000 0 0 14 2,496 1,172 

19-Jun-13 0000 0 0 595 727 0000 0 0 14 2,496 1,107 

20-Jun-13 0000 0 0 595 727 0000 0 0 14 2,496 656 

21-Jun-13 0000 0 0 595 727 0000 0 0 14 2,496 1,612 

22-Jun-13 0000 0 0 595 727 0000 0 0 14 2,496 838 

23-Jun-13 0000 0 0 595 727 0000 0 0 14 2,496 834 

24-Jun-13 0000 0 0 595 727 0000 0 0 14 2,496 834 

25-Jun-13 0000 0 0 595 727 0000 0 0 14 2,496 2,392 

26-Jun-13 0000 0 0 595 727 0000 0 0 14 2,496 2,983 

27-Jun-13 0000 0 0 595 727 0000 0 0 14 2,496 3,412 

28-Jun-13 0000 0 0 595 727 0000 0 0 14 2,496 5,539 

29-Jun-13 0000 0 0 595 727 0000 0 0 14 2,496 5,673 

30-Jun-13 0000 0 0 595 727 0000 0 0 14 2,496 5,740 

Total 0 0 0 0 0 0 595 727 0 0 0 0 0 0 14 2,496 56,917 2

Winter Run Incidental Take Levels (Oct 1 thru May 31) Spring Run Incidental Take Levels for Season Combined Total (Oct 1 thru Jun 30)

Preliminary

Banks Tr
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY ELEVATION

 252.54

 252.54

 252.53

 252.56

 252.57

 252.60

 252.57

 252.57

 252.50

 252.56

 252.52

 252.55

 252.49

 252.51

 252.55

 252.51

 252.54

 252.54

 252.53

 252.51

 252.50

 252.53

 252.54

 252.52

 252.50

 252.53

 252.56

 252.51

 252.49

 252.51

 252.49

 3,943

 3,943

 3,938

 3,953

 3,958

 3,973

 3,958

 3,958

 3,924

 3,953

 3,933

 3,948

 3,919

 3,928

 3,948

 3,928

 3,943

 3,943

 3,938

 3,928

 3,924

 3,938

 3,943

 3,933

 3,924

 3,938

 3,953

 3,928

 3,919

 3,928

 3,919

STORAGE

-15

+0

-5

+15

+5

+15

-15

+0

-34

+29

-20

+15

-29

+9

+20

-20

+15

+0

-5

-10

-4

+14

+5

-10

-9

+14

+15

-25

-9

+9

-9

CHANGE

 1,048

 1,048

 1,032

 1,030

 905

 937

 949

 992

 1,005

 994

 761

 760

 923

 999

 995

 923

 880

 902

 886

 771

 801

 805

 804

 845

 873

 955

 929

 920

 924

 920

 828

 14,910

 14,190

 15,140

 14,910

 15,150

 15,030

 15,150

 14,670

 14,670

 14,430

 15,150

 15,030

 14,670

 14,430

 14,790

 14,670

 14,790

 14,550

 14,550

 14,670

 14,670

 16,110

 15,750

 16,230

 15,990

 15,990

 15,990

 14,430

 14,790

 12,870

 12,870

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

JULY 2004 RED BLUFF DIVERSION RESERVOIR DAILY OPERATIONS RUN DATE: August 24, 2004

IN LAKE

CANAL

 ACRE-FEET

TOTALS -39 28,344 461,240

ACRE-FEET -39 56,220 914,870

SUMMARY

RELEASE (ACRE-FEET)

TOTAL 975,642

 3,958

RELEASE

RIVER

CORNING TO SACTO

CANAL

RELEASE C.F.S

TEHAMA

COLUSA

 58

 59

 76

 64

 51

 54

 69

 86

 95

 78

 65

 78

 67

 73

 85

 82

 69

 51

 57

 63

 70

 84

 79

 72

 82

 77

 88

 97

 97

 84

 85

 2,295

 4,552

CORNING CANAL 4,552

TEHAMA-COLUSA CANAL 56,220

TO SACTO RIVER 914,870

Table 9
### SUBCHAPTER III—EXECUTIVE AGREEMENT BETWEEN UNITED STATES AND PHILIPPINES
Editorial Note on Part 416
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 416 appear at 68 FR 53509, Sept. 11, 2003.

§ 416.1477 Case remanded by Appeals Council. ( a ) *When the Appeals Council may remand a case.* The Appeals Council may remand a case to an administrative law judge so that he or she may hold a hearing and issue a decision or a recommended decision. The Appeals Council may also remand a case in which additional evidence is needed or additional action by the administrative law judge is required.
( b ) *Action by administrative law judge on remand.* The administrative law judge shall take any action that is ordered by the Appeals Council and may take any additional action that is not inconsistent with the Appeals Council's remand order.
( c ) *Notice when case is returned with a recommended decision.* When the administrative law judge sends a case to the Appeals Council with a recommended decision, a notice is mailed to the parties at their last known address. The notice tells them that the case has been sent to the Appeals Council, explains the rules for filing briefs or other written statements with the Appeals Council, and includes a copy of the recommended decision.
( d ) *Filing briefs with and obtaining evidence from the Appeals Council.* ( 1 ) You may file briefs or other written statements about the facts and law relevant to your case with the Appeals Council within 20 days of the date that the recommended decision is mailed to you. Any party may ask the Appeals Council for additional time to file briefs or statements. The Appeals Council will extend this period, as appropriate, if you show that you had good cause for missing the deadline.
( 2 ) All other rules for filing briefs with and obtaining evidence from the Appeals Council follow the procedures explained in this subpart.
( e ) *Procedures before the Appeals Council.* ( 1 ) The Appeals Council after receiving a recommended decision will conduct its proceedings and issue its decision according to the procedures explained in this subpart.
( 2 ) If the Appeals Council believes that more evidence is required, it may again remand the case to an administrative law judge for further inquiry into the issues, rehearing, receipt of evidence, and another decision or recommended decision. However, if the Appeals Council decides that it can get the additional evidence more quickly, it will take appropriate action.
Exhibit 23.2
  Consent
    of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
EXHIBIT 31.2


                            CERTIFICATION


I, David R. Saracino, Treasurer and Chief Financial Officer,
certify, that:

     1.   I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10Q for the
period ended June 30, 2004, of First Keystone Corporation.

    2.   Based on my knowledge, the quarterly report does not
contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a
material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the
circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading
with respect to the period covered by this quarterly report.

    3.   Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and
other financial information included in this quarterly report,
fairly present in all material respects the financial condition,
results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and
for, the periods presented in this quarterly report.

    4.   The registrant's other certifying officer and I are
responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and
procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for
the registrant and we have:

       a)   designed such disclosure controls and procedures to
    ensure that material information relating to the registrant,
    including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us
    by others within those entities, particularly during the
    period in which this quarterly report is being prepared;

       b)   evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's
    disclosure controls and procedures as of a date within 90 days
    prior to the filing date of this quarterly report (the
    "Evaluation Date"); and

       c)   presented in this quarterly report our conclusions
    about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and
    procedures based on our evaluation as of the Evaluation Date.

    5.   The registrant's other certifying officer and I have
disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation, to the registrant's
auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board of
directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):

       a)   all significant deficiencies in the design or
    operation of the internal controls which could adversely
    affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize
    and report financial data and have identified for the
    registrant's auditors any material weaknesses in internal
    controls; and

       b)   any fraud, whether or not material, that involves
    management or other employees who have a significant role in
    the registrant's internal controls.



                            /s/ David R. Saracino
                            David R. Saracino
                            Treasurer and Chief Financial Officer


August 12, 2004


                                26
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY ELEV

 943.26

 942.92

 942.52

 942.11

 941.71

 941.31

 940.90

 940.60

 940.27

 939.91

 939.48

 939.25

 939.72

 941.57

 942.11

 942.08

 941.88

 941.84

 941.68

 941.60

 941.47

 941.33

 941.20

 940.99

 940.85

 940.62

 940.39

 940.12

 939.85

 939.61

 939.40

 1,768.3

 1,762.9

 1,756.6

 1,750.1

 1,743.9

 1,737.6

 1,731.2

 1,726.6

 1,721.4

 1,715.9

 1,709.2

 1,705.6

 1,712.9

 1,741.7

 1,750.1

 1,749.7

 1,746.5

 1,745.9

 1,743.4

 1,742.2

 1,740.1

 1,737.9

 1,735.9

 1,732.6

 1,730.5

 1,726.9

 1,723.3

 1,719.1

 1,714.9

 1,711.2

 1,707.9

STORAGE

-5.7

-5.4

-6.3

-6.4

-6.3

-6.3

-6.4

-4.7

-5.1

-5.6

-6.7

-3.6

+7.3

+28.8

+8.4

-0.5

-3.1

-0.6

-2.5

-1.3

-2.0

-2.2

-2.0

-3.3

-2.2

-3.6

-3.6

-4.2

-4.2

-3.7

-3.3

CHANGE

 2,581

 2,791

 2,523

 2,499

 2,636

 2,699

 2,457

 2,897

 3,171

 2,640

 2,694

 3,855

 9,672

 19,800

 9,076

 5,044

 4,512

 4,253

 4,528

 4,415

 3,986

 3,899

 4,245

 3,608

 3,846

 3,564

 3,535

 3,504

 3,336

 3,145

 3,287

INFLOW

 4,872

 4,849

 5,054

 5,171

 5,238

 5,255

 5,087

 4,670

 5,189

 4,885

 5,489

 5,061

 5,480

 4,595

 4,122

 4,648

 5,094

 3,209

 4,295

 3,548

 3,389

 3,414

 3,572

 3,681

 3,384

 3,794

 3,771

 4,073

 3,898

 3,483

 3,391

POWER

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

SPILL

 511

 511

 510

 510

 509

 508

 508

 507

 507

 506

 506

 505

 505

 507

 509

 509

 822

 1,331

 1,493

 1,492

 1,492

 1,491

 1,490

 1,489

 1,489

 1,488

 1,487

 1,486

 1,485

 1,484

 1,483

OUTLET

 70

 139

 130

 69

 46

 87

 87

 69

 59

 68

 68

 91

 5

 184

 185

 125

 176

 28

 0

 5

 129

 97

 207

 92

 69

 83

 78

 59

 68

 59

 59

C.F.S.

 .15

 .30

 .28

 .15

 .10

 .19

 .19

 .15

 .13

 .15

 .15

 .20

 .01

 .40

 .40

 .27

 .38

 .06

 .00

 .01

 .28

 .21

 .45

 .20

 .15

 .18

 .17

 .13

 .15

 .13

 .13

INCHES

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 1.35

 3.02

 1.55

 .03

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .21

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

PRECIP

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

OCTOBER 2009 SHASTA LAKE DAILY OPERATIONS RUN DATE: November 1, 2009

IN LAKE

EVAPORATION

INCHES

C.F.S.

COMPUTED*

1000 ACRE-FEET

RELEASE - C.F.S.

RIVER

TOTALS -66.3 134,698 135,661 0 29,630 2,691 5.85 6.16

ACRE-FEET -66,300 267,173 269,084 0 58,771 5,338

COMMENTS:

* COMPUTED INFLOW IS THE SUM OF CHANGE IN STORAGE, RELEASES AND EVAPORATION.

SUMMARY

RELEASE (ACRE-FEET)

POWER 269,084

SPILL 0

OUTLET

TOTAL

 58,771

 327,855

PRECIPITATION

THIS MONTH =

TO DATE =

 6.16

JULY 1, 2009 6.19

 1,773.9
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY HIGH

 10,651

 10,037

 10,569

 11,390

 9,807

 10,399

 9,947

 8,673

 7,808

 8,232

 8,702

 11,209

 11,003

 11,336

 11,476

 11,181

 9,994

 6,652

 4,587

 4,169

 3,644

 3,144

 3,280

 3,379

 3,110

 3,360

 3,209

 3,167

 3,364

 2,835

 3,004

 1,645

 1,830

 1,851

 1,942

 2,136

 2,158

 2,136

 2,507

 2,703

 2,660

 2,845

 2,883

 3,146

 2,838

 2,533

 2,152

 2,172

 1,660

 1,587

 1,485

 1,424

 1,493

 1,409

 1,463

 1,447

 1,186

 1,091

 992

 993

 931

 938

 4,710

 4,706

 5,042

 5,128

 5,073

 5,209

 5,351

 5,418

 5,141

 5,023

 4,913

 5,278

 5,998

 5,993

 5,653

 5,341

 4,868

 3,360

 2,655

 2,462

 2,269

 2,134

 2,086

 2,075

 2,028

 1,899

 1,884

 1,955

 1,952

 1,749

 1,799

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

AUGUST 2005 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: September 12, 2005

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

PITTSBURG BOTTOM ON THE SACRAMENTO RIVER
#### § 418.3601 When do you have the right to administrative review?

You have the right to an administrative review of the initial determination we make about your eligibility and about your continuing eligibility for a subsidy and any other matter that gives you the right to further review as discussed in § 418.3605. If you are married and living with your spouse and your spouse's eligibility for a subsidy may be adversely affected by our decision upon review, we will notify your spouse before our review and give him or her the opportunity to present additional information for us to consider.
Exhibit 10.3


 


ELEVENTH AMENDMENT TO THE


SECOND AMENDED AND RESTATED 


AGREEMENT OF LIMITED PARTNERSHIP OF


BLUEROCK RESIDENTIAL HOLDINGS, L.P.


 


DESIGNATION OF ADDITIONAL SERIES B 


REDEEMABLE PREFERRED UNITS


 


NOVEMBER 16, 2018


 


Pursuant to Section 4.02 and Article XI
of the Second Amended and Restated Agreement of Limited Partnership of Bluerock Residential Holdings, L.P. (the “Partnership
Agreement”), the General Partner hereby amends the Partnership Agreement as follows:


 


1.       Designation
and Number. The number of authorized Series B Preferred Units shall be 1,225,000.


 


2.       Except
as modified herein, all terms and conditions of the Partnership Agreement shall remain in full force and effect, which terms and
conditions the General Partner hereby ratifies and confirms.


 




     


     


    

  


IN WITNESS WHEREOF,
the undersigned has executed this Amendment as of the date first set forth above.


 


	 	GENERAL PARTNER:
	 	 
	 	BLUEROCK RESIDENTIAL GROWTH REIT, INC.,
	 	a Maryland corporation
	 	 	 
	 	By:	/s/ Michael L. Konig
	 	Name:	Michael L. Konig
	 	Title:	Chief Legal Officer and Secretary


 


[Signature page for OP Amendment re:
Additional Series B Preferred Units – November 2018]
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY HIGH

 81

 88

 85

 89

 77

 92

 71

 91

 94

 93

 86

 83

 92

 90

 98

 91

 86

 82

 89

 87

 85

 99

 93

 85

 81

 94

 107

 99

 114

 105

 97

 67

 68

 66

 67

 69

 68

 65

 66

 68

 69

 68

 73

 69

 72

 73

 74

 73

 76

 72

 74

 76

 74

 71

 63

 73

 75

 75

 73

 75

 75

 76

 71

 72

 70

 71

 72

 71

 68

 72

 73

 75

 72

 76

 73

 75

 77

 78

 76

 77

 77

 78

 80

 79

 75

 72

 78

 80

 80

 78

 83

 84

 81

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

AUGUST 2007 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: September 11, 2007

HIGH LOW MEAN

 75.6

 75.5

 75.8

 76.3

 74.5

 72.3

 71.6

 72.2

 73.1

 74.2

 73.7

 73.3

 73.2

 73.8

 74.3

 74.6

 73.6

 73.8

 73.3

 75.0

 76.7

 77.6

 76.8

 76.5

 76.4

 76.2

 76.2

 76.8

 78.2

 78.6

 78.5

 71.5

 71.0

 71.1

 71.7

 70.9

 68.8

 67.6

 67.8

 68.4

 69.6

 69.4

 68.3

 68.5

 68.7

 69.5

 69.5

 68.7

 68.8

 68.4

 69.8

 71.3

 72.8

 72.7

 72.2

 71.9

 71.4

 71.4

 72.0

 73.2

 74.1

 74.7

 73.5

 73.4

 73.5

 74.0

 72.8

 70.6

 69.7

 69.8

 70.8

 71.7

 71.6

 70.8

 71.0

 71.2

 71.7

 71.8

 71.2

 71.2

 70.8

 72.0

 73.8

 74.6

 74.7

 74.3

 74.2

 73.7

 73.7

 73.9

 75.5

 76.3

 76.5

HIGH LOW MEAN

 8.7

 8.9

 8.7

 8.5

 8.6

 9.2

 9.3

 9.2

 9.1

 8.9

 8.8

 8.9

 9.0

 8.9

 8.8

 8.7

 8.8

 8.8

 9.0

 8.6

 8.3

 8.6

 8.4

 8.3

 8.4

 8.3

 8.8

 8.5

 8.4

 8.4

 8.3

 8.2

 8.2

 8.1

 7.9

 7.9

 8.4

 8.7

 8.6

 8.4

 8.3

 8.2

 8.4

 8.3

 8.3

 8.3

 8.1

 8.2

 8.2

 8.3

 8.2

 7.6

 7.6

 7.9

 7.6

 7.6

 7.7

 7.7

 7.9

 7.1

 7.6

 7.4

 8.4

 8.5

 8.4

 8.2

 8.3

 8.8

 9.0

 8.9

 8.7

 8.5

 8.5

 8.6

 8.7

 8.6

 8.5

 8.4

 8.5

 8.5

 8.6

 8.4

 8.0

 7.9

 8.2

 8.1

 7.9

 7.9

 8.0

 8.1

 7.9

 7.9

 7.7

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

RIPON ON THE STANISLAUS RIVER

 ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS WATER TEMPERATURE, DEG DISSOLVED OXYZEN, PPM
(No. 6870

#### Atlantic Richfield Company, Claimant, *vs.*State of Illinois, Secretary of State, Respondent.

*Opinion filed November 21, 1972.*

D. K. McIntosh, Attorney for Claimant.

William J. Scott, Attorney General; Saul R. Wexler, Assistant Attorney General, for Respondent.

*142Per Curiam.
# C_2013122EN.01000101.xml

| 27.4.2013 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 122/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

27.4.2013

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 122/1

---

RECOMMENDATION OF THE EUROPEAN CENTRAL BANK

of 19 April 2013

to the Council of the European Union on the external auditors of the European Central Bank

(ECB/2013/9)

2013/C 122/01

THE GOVERNING COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN CENTRAL BANK,

Having regard to the Statute of the European System of Central Banks and of the European Central Bank, and in particular Article 27.1 thereof,

Whereas:

| (1) | The accounts of the European Central Bank (ECB) and national central banks of the Member States whose currency is the euro are audited by independent external auditors recommended by the ECB’s Governing Council and approved by the Council of the European Union. |
| --- | --- |

(1)

The accounts of the European Central Bank (ECB) and national central banks of the Member States whose currency is the euro are audited by independent external auditors recommended by the ECB’s Governing Council and approved by the Council of the European Union.

| (2) | The mandate of the ECB’s current external auditors ended following the audit for the financial year 2012. It is therefore necessary to appoint external auditors from the financial year 2013. |
| --- | --- |

(2)

The mandate of the ECB’s current external auditors ended following the audit for the financial year 2012. It is therefore necessary to appoint external auditors from the financial year 2013.

| (3) | The ECB has selected Ernst & Young GmbH Wirtschaftsprüfungsgesellschaft as its external auditors for the financial years 2013 to 2017, |
| --- | --- |

(3)

The ECB has selected Ernst & Young GmbH Wirtschaftsprüfungsgesellschaft as its external auditors for the financial years 2013 to 2017,

HAS ADOPTED THIS RECOMMENDATION:

It is recommended that Ernst & Young GmbH Wirtschaftsprüfungsgesellschaft should be appointed as the external auditors of the ECB for the financial years 2013 to 2017.

Done at Frankfurt am Main, 19 April 2013.

The President of the ECB

Mario DRAGHI

---
#### § 418.2315 How will we notify you and what information will we provide about our initial determination?

We will follow the rules in § 418.1315, except that any references in that section to regulations in subpart B of this part shall be treated as references to the corresponding regulation in this subpart.
Exhibit 32.1

PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICERS CERTIFICATION

PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT
OF 2002

In connection with the annual report of Brooke Credit Corporation (the Company) on Form 10-K for the period ending
December 31, 2007, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Michael S. Lowry, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:



| | 1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | -- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Date: March 13, 2008



/s/    MICHAEL S.
LOWRYMichael S. LowryChief Executive Officer