4. 2 Stac k Ga s Sample s o f

stac k ga s wer e collecte dfo r

determinatio n o f

th e followin g analytical parameters :

• PM ; • HC1/C1 2 ; • Metals ; an

d • Dioxins/Furans . Th e stack ga s concentratio n o f

th e tes t parameters reporte d a

s th e average o f

thre e tes t run s ar e use d t o documen

t compliance . Stack

ga s concentratio n fo r

aparamete

r ma y includ e analytical result s fo r

multipl e components . Fo r th e determinatio n o f

stac k ga s concentratio n measure d i n a n individua l sample , o

r run , fo r thos e samplin g system s a s applicabl e (othe

r tha n SW-84 6 Metho d0023A) , th e followin g conventio n i s use d t o sumthe result s o f

multipl e analyses :

• I n case s wher

e al l analytica

l result s ar

e hit s (i.e. , not

"non-detects") , al l analytical result s wil l b e summed . • I n case s wher

e al l analytica

l result s ar

e "non-detects, " al l metho d detectio n limit s wil l b e summed , an

d th e summe d result reporte d a

s amaximu m("<") . • I n case s wher

e on e o r mor e analytical result s ar

e hits , an d on

e or mor e analytical result s ar e "non-detects, " th

e hit s an d th

e "non-detects " wil l be summe d and reported a s amaximu m("<") . Exampl e calculation s o f

th e HW C MAC T emissio n hmit s fo r PM , HCI /CI2 , metals , dioxins/furans , an d TH C showing th e calculation s performe d fo r areporte d result

ar e presented followin g th

e respectiv e table . 4.2. 1 P M i n Stac k

Ga s Stack ga s sample s fo r

determinatio n o f

P M wer e collecte daccordin g t

o EP A Metho d5 . Thes e sample s wer

e analyze d gravimetricall y fo r P M accordin g t

o EP A Metho d5 , Tw o sample s wer e recovere d fro meac h train fo r th e determinatio n o f

PM . The y wer

e a s follows :

• A n aceton

e rins e o f th e prob e and nozzl e (PNR) , and ;
• Filte r (FILT) .

4-1 8

VES01740 0Th e result s fo r

P M ar e presented i n Tabl e 4-1 4 fo r Uni t 2 , Tabl e 4-1 5 fo r

Unit 3 , an d Tabl e 4-1 6 fo r

Uni t 4 . Th e concentratio n o f

oxygen measured usin g CEM S an d EP A Metho d3 A durin g th e collectio n o f

th e EP A Metho d5 sample s ar e show n i n th e tables , an

d th e concentratio n o f

P M i n th e stac k ga s correcte d t

o 7 % O 2 i s shown . Th e analytical result s fo r

th e determinatio n o f

P M ar e include di n Appendi x G4 . Tabl e 4-14 . Uni t 2 - Result s o f P M i n Stac k Ga s
Dat e Tim e Run l

10-8-1 3 11:50-13:0 0 Ru n 2 10-9-1 3 09:45-10:5 3 Ru n 3

10-10-1 3 09:15-10:2 3 Volum e Collecte d (dscf ) 40.81 5 42.35 6 41.27 8 Oxyge n Concentratio n (% ) 11.5 6 11.2 3 11.4 8 P M Foun d (mg ) 

### mm <0.5 <0. 5 <0. 5 Prob e and Nozzl e Rins e 1.0 5 0.8 0 0.5 5 Tota l <1,5 5 <1.3 <1.05 Stac k Ga s Loadin g Particulate Matte r (mg/dscf ) <0.03 8 <0.03 1 <0.025 Particulate Matte r (mg/dscm ) <1. 3 <1. 1 <0.9 0 Particulate Matte r (mg/dscm , correcte d to 1% O J <2. 0 <1. 6 <1. 3 Particulate Matte r (gr/dscf ) <0.0005 9 <0.00047 <0.0003 9 Particulate Matte r (gr/dscf , correcte d to 7

% 0 2 ) <0.00087 <0.0006 8 <0.OO05 8 Particulate Matte r (gr/dscf , correcte d to 7

% 0 2 ) <0.0007 1

4-1 9

VES01740 1Particulat e Matte r HW C MAC T Sampl e Calculation , gr/dsc f @ 7 % O z Uni t 2-Ru n 2

P M Stac k Concentratio

n (mg/dscf

) =

P M Stac k Concentratio

n (mg/dscf

) = Tota

l IVIas s Loadin g (mg ) Sampl e Volum e (dscf ) <1. 3 m g 42.35 6 dsc f = <0.03 1

P M Stac k Concentratio

n (gr/dscf

)

P M Stac k Concentratio

n (gr/dscf

) Stac

k Concentratio

n X (mg/dscf ) <0.03 1 mg/dsc

f X 0.0154 3 m g 1 grai n 0.0154 3 m g 1 grai n <0.0004 7

PM Stac k Concentratio

n (gr/dsc f @ 7% 0 2 )

PM Stac k Concentratio

n (gr/dsc f @ 7% 0 2 ) Stac k (21 % -7%) Concentratio

n X (gr/dscf ) (21%-Meas.0 2 ) 0.000 6 gr/dsc f X (21-7 )

(21-11.23 ) = 0.0006 8

4-20

VES01740 2Tabl e 4-15 . Uni t 3 - Result s o f P M i n Stac k

Ga s
Dat e Tim e Run l

10-15-1 3 13:16-14:2 5 Ru n 2 10-16-1 3 11:15-12:2 5 Ru n 3 1 10-171 3 09:50-10:5 7 Volum e Collecte d (dscf ) 41.22 9 42.46 1 41.92 1 Oxyge n Concentratio n (% ) 12.87 13.3 8 11.74 

# 1 Particulat e Matte r Foun d (mg ) | Filte r 1.0 5 1.

3 1.1 5 Prob e an d Nozzl e Rins e 1.9 5 1.

7 2. 5 Tota l 3.0 0 3.0 0 3.65 Stac k Ga s Loadin g - Front-Hal f Onl y Particulate Matte r (mg/dscf ) 0.0728 0.070 7 0.087 1 Particulate Matte r (mg/dscm ) 2.5 7 2.5 0 3.0 7 Particulate Matte r (mg/dscm , correcte d t o 7 % 0 2 ) 4.4 5 4.6 1 4.6 7 Particulate Matte r (gr/dscf ) 0.0011 2 0.0010 9 0.0013 4 Particulate Matte r (gr/dscf , correcte d t

o 7 % 0 2 ) 0.00194 0.0020 2 0.0020 4 Particulate Matte r (gr/dscf , correcte d t

o 7 % 0 2 ) 0.0020 0

4-2 1

VES01740 3Tabl e 4-16 . Uni t 4 - Result s o f P M i n Stac k

Ga s
Dat e Tim e Run l

10-23-1 3 09:30-10:4 2 Ru n 3

10-25-1 3 09:35-10:4 0 Ru n 4

10-25-1 3 10:50-11:5 5 Volum e Collecte d (dscf ) 38.18 1 39.69 1 36.75 9 Oxyge n Concentratio n (% ) 12.2 2 12.4 8 12.1 1 Particulat e Matte r Foun d (mg ) Filte r 1.9 5 0. 5 <0, 5 Prob e and Nozzl e Rins e 2. 2 2.3 5 2. 4 Front-Hal f

Tota l 4.1 5 2.8 5 <2. 9 Stac k Ga s Loadin g - Front-Hal f Onl y Particulate Matte r (mg/dscf ) 0.10 9 0.071 8 <0.07 9 Particulat

e Matte r (mg/dscm ) 3.84 2.5 4 <2.8 Particulate Matte r (mg/dscm , correcte d t o 7 % 0 2 ) 6.1 5 4.1 9 <4. 4 Particulat

e Matte r (gr/dscf

) 0.0016 8 0.0011 1 <0.001 2 Particulat

e Matte r (gr/dscf

, correcte d t

o 1% 0 2 ) 0.0026 9 0.0018 3 <0.001 9 Particulat

e Matte r (gr/dscf

, correcte d t

o 1% 0 2 ) <0.002 1
4.2. 2 HCI/CI ? i n Stac k Ga s Stack ga s sample s fo r

determinatio n o f

HC /CI 2 wer

e collecte dusin g aModifie dMetho d 26A . Sample s wer

e analyze dfo r

th e chlorid e io n usin g I C accordin g t o EP A Metho d26A . Eac h trai n was recovere dint o multipl e components fo r analysi s a

s follows :

• The first

tw o impingers , whic h contained0. 1 N sulfuri c aci d(ACEDIMP) ; an d

• Th e fourt h andfift h impingers , whic h containe d0.1 N sodiu mhydroxid e (ALKTMP) . Th e result s fo r

HC1/C1 2ar

e presente d i n Tabl e 4-1 7 fo r Uni t 2 , Tabl e 4-1 8 fo r

Uni t 3 , an d Tabl e 4-1 9 fo r

Uni t 4 . The concentratio n o f

oxygen measure

dusin g CEM S an dEP A Metho d3 A durin g th e secon dhal f o f th e ru n i s show n i n th

e tables , andth

e concentratio n o f

HCI /CI 2 convertedt

o chlorid e equivalent s (CT ) an dcorrectedt o 7 % O 2 i s shown . The analytical result s fo r th e determinatio n o f

HCI/CI 2 ar

e include di n Appendi x G4 .

4-22

VES01740 4Tabl e 4-17 . Uni t 2 - Result s o f HCI/CI 2 i n Stac k

Ga s
Dat e Tim e Run l

10-8-1 3 15:40-16:4 0 Ru n 3 10-10-1 3 12:30-13:3 0 Ru n 5 10-30-1 3 12:45-13:4 5 Volum e Collecte d (dscf ) 37.38 4 37.29 0 36.87 9 Oxyge n Concentratio n (% ) 10.0 8 10.3 8 10.5 0 Hydroge n Chlorid e 36,60 0 15,500 21,60 0 Chlorin e <160 <180 <180 Concentratio n (mg/dscf ) Hydroge n Chlorid e 0.97 9 0.41 6 0.58 6 Chlorin e <0.004 3 <0.004 8 <0.0049 Concentratio n (chlorid e equivalents , ppmvd ) Hydroge n Chlorid e 22. 8 9.68 13. 6 Chlorin e <0.1 0 <0.1 2 <0.1 2 Tota l <2 3 <9.8 <1 4 Concentratio n (chlorid e equivalents , ppmvd , correcte d to 7 % 0 2 ) Tota l <2 9 <1 3 <1 8 Averag e <2 0

4-2 3

VES01740 5HCI/CI 2 HW C MAC T Sampl e Calculation , ppmv d @ 7 % 0 2 Uni t 2 - Ru n 2 Sum o f HC I Sampl e Fractio n Value s (ng

) X HC I Stac k Concentratio n (mg/dscf )
HC I Stac k Concentratio n (mg/dscf )
HC I Stac k Concentratio n (chlorid e equivalent s ppmvd ]

HC I Stack Concentratio n (chlorid e equivalent s ppmvd )

Cl 2Stack Concentratio n (mg/dscf )
Cl 2Stack Concentratio n (mg/dscf )
CI 2 Stack Concentratio n (chlorid e equivalent s ppmvd )

CI 2 Stac k Concentratio n (chlorid e equivalent s ppmvd )

Concentratio n (chlorid e equivalent s ppmvd )
Concentratio n (chlorid e equivalent s ppmvd )
Concentratio n (ppmv d @ 7% 02 )
Concentratio n (ppmv d @ 7% 02 ) Sampl e Volum e (dscf ) 15,50 0 u g 37.29 0 dscf Concentratio n (mg /dscf ) 28.31 7 L /c f 24 L/g-mo l Molecula r Weigh tof HC I (g/g-mol ) 0.41 6 mg/dsc f

HC I 28.31 7 L /c f 2 4 L /g-mo l 36. 5 g/g-mo l Sum o f Cl 2Sampl e Fractio n Value s (ug ) Sampl e Volum e (dscf ) <18 0 u g 37.29 0 dscf Concentratio n (mg /dscf ) 28.31 7 L /c f 2 4 L /g -mo l [Molecula r Weigh to f CI 2 (g/g -mol) ] /

2 Chlorid e Equivalents

. <0.004 8 mg/dsc f

CI 2 28.31 7 L /c f 24 L /g-mo l 35. 5 g/g -mo l

HC I Stac k Concentratio n (chlorid e equivalent

s ppmvd )
9.6 8 ppmv d
Concentratio n (chlorid e equivalent s ppmvd ) <9.8 0 ppmv d lm g 10 ' ug lm g ltru g
10 ° m g 10 6 ppmv d l g lcFm g 10 6 ppmv d

10 ° ug l m g 10' p g
l g 10 ° m g 10 6 ppmv d

l g 1 0 m g 10 s ppmv d

CI 2 Stac k Concentratio n (chlorid e equivalent s ppmvd ) <0.1 2 ppmv d (21 % - 7%

) (21 % - Meas . 02 ) (21-7 ) (21-10.38 ) 0.41 6

= 9.68

= <0.0048

= <0.1 2

<9. 8

= <1 3

4-2 4Tabl e 4-18 . Uni t 3 - Result s o f HCI/CI 2 i n Stac k

Ga s
Dat e Tim e Ru n 2

10-16-1 3 14:00-15:0 0 Ru n 3 10-17-1 3 12:30-13:3 3 Ru n 4 10-18-1 3 09:35-10:3 5 Volum e Collecte d (dscf ) 36.08 8 34.59 7 35.24 1 Oxyge n Concentratio n (% ) 11.1 9 10.7 2 10.8 7 Mas s Foun d (ug) Hydroge n Chlorid e 4,74 0 4,72 0 1,81 0 Chlorin e <130 <12 0 <140 Concentratio n (mg/dscf ) Hydroge n Chlorid e 0.13 1 0.13 6 0.051 4 Chlorin e <0.003 6 <0.003 5 <0.004 0 Concentratio n (chlorid e equivalents ppmvd ) Hydroge n Chlorid e 3.0 6 3.1 8 1.2 0 Chlorin e <0.08 6 <0.08 3 <0.09 5 Tota l <3. 1 <3.3 <1. 3 Concentratio n (Chlorid e equivalents , ppmvd , correcte d t o 1% 0 2 ) Tota l <4.5 <4.4 <1. 8 Averag e <3. 6

Tabl e 4-19 . Uni t 4 - Result s of HCI/CI 2 i n Stac k Ga s
Dat e Tim e Run l

10/23/201 3 12:36-13:3 6 Ru n 3 10/24/201 3 12:35-13:3 5 Ru n 4 10/25/201 3 13:35-14:3 5 Volum e Collecte d (dscf ) 39.93 5 39.26 4 37.03 4 Oxyge n Concentratio n (% ) 12.2 7 12.3 7 12.0 0 Mas s Foun d (ug

) Hydroge n Chlorid e 11,10 0 8,15 0 23,60 0 Chlorin e <13 0 <120 <140 Concentratio n (mg/dscf ) Hydroge n Chlorid e 0.27 8 0.20 8 0.63 7 Chlorin e <0.0033 <0.003 1 <0.003 8 Concentratio n (chlorid e equivalents ppmvd ) Hydroge n Chlorid e 6.4 7 4.8 4 14. 8 Chlorin e <0.078 <0.07 3 <0.09 1 Tota l <6. 6 <4. 9 . <1 5 Concentratio n (Chlorid e equivalents , ppmvd , correcte d to 7 % O J Tota l <1 1 <8. 0 <2 3 Averag e <1 4
4-2 5

VES01740 74.2. 3 Metal s i n Stac k Ga s Metal s wer

e sampledi n th e stac

k ga s usin g EP A Metho d29 . The sample s wer e analyzed fo r th e si x (6 ) metal s regulated b y th e HW C MACT . Fiv e metals , arsenic , berylHum , cadmium , chromium , andlead

) wer e analyze dusin g ICPE S accordin g t o Metho d6010 B o f

SW-846 . Mercury analysi s wa

s performe d b y col dvapor atomi c absorptio n spectroscop y accordin g t o Metho d7470 A o f

SW-846 . Th e Metho d2 9 samphng train s wer e recovere dt o provide the followin g fractions :

• Prob e an

dnozzl e rins e wit

h 0. 1 N nitri c aci d(PNR) ;

• Filte r (FELT) ;

• Conten

t an d rins e o f th e acidifie dperoxide impinger s with 0. 1 N nitri c aci d(NPI) ;

• Content s an

drins e o f th e empt y impinger

wit h 0. 1 N nitri c aci d(EER) ;

• Content s an

d rins e o f th e acidifie dpermanganat

e impinger s with deionize d water, 0. 1 N nitri c acid , andpermanganat e solutio n (Perm) ; and ;
• Rinse ' o f

th e permanganat

e impinger s with hydrochlori c aci d(HClRns) . The analytica

l result s fo r

metal s i n th

e individua l sample fraction s ar e presente

d i n Tabl e 4-20 fo r Uni t 2 , Tabl e 4-2 2 fo r

Uni t 3 , andTabl e 4-2

4 fo r Uni t 4 . Th e concentration s o f th e metal s i n th

e stac k ga s ar e presented i n Tabl e 4-2 1 fo r Uni t 2 , Tabl e 4-2 3 fo r

Uni t 3 , an dTabl e 4-25 fo r Uni t 4 . The concentratio n o f

oxyge n measure

dusin g CEM S an

dEP A Metho d3 A durin g th e secon d hal f

o f th e tes t ar e shown i n Table s 4-21,4-23 , an d4-25 , and th e concentratio n o f metal s i n th

e stac k ga s correcte dt

o 7 % O 2 i s shown . The concentration s o f cadmiu man

dlea d ar e shown summe

d a s SVM , andth

e concentration s o f

arsenic , beryllium , an

dchromiu mar

e shown summe

da s LVM . Th e analytical result s fo r th e determination o f

metal s i n th

e stac k ga s ar e include di n Appendi x G3 .

4-2 6

VES01740 8Tabl e 4-20 . Uni t 2 - Analytica l Result s of Metal s i n Stac k Ga s

Ru n Analyt e Nitri c Aci d PN R & Filte r Nitri c Aci d &

Hydroge n Peroxid e Impinger s Empt y

Impinge r Rins e Potassiu m

Permanganat e Impinge r HC I

Rins e Tota l

1 Arseni c <0,3 7 <0.2

5 <0.25 <0.8 7
1 Berylliu m <0.01 5 <0.01 5 <0.01 5 <0.045 1 Cadmiu m <0.02 1 <0.02 1 <0.02 1 <0.06 3 1 Chromiu m 3. 3 0.78 0.33 4.4 1 1 Lea d 1. 3 0.3 5 <0.2 7 <1. 9 1
Mercur y <0.08 84. 2 51. 6 <31.13 6 1.1 <17 0

3 Arseni c <0.7 4 <0.2

5 <0.99
3 Berylliu m <0.01 5 <0.01 5 <0.0 3 3 Cadmiu m <0.02 1 <0.02 1 <0.04 2 3 Chromiu m 2. 5 0.5 5 3.05 3 Lea d <1 0.27 <1. 3 3
Mercur y <0.0 8 182 0.57 0. 5 17.2 <20 0

5 Arseni c 0.7 7 <0.2

5 < 1
5 Berylliu m 0.01 6 <0.01 5 <0.03 1 5 Cadmiu m <0.02 1 <0.02 1 <0.042 5 Chromiu m 2. 3 0.8 1 3.1 1 5 Lea d < 1 0.6 6 <1. 7 5
Mercur y <0.0 8 14

2 <0.1 5 3. 4 14.3 <160

1 Th e empt

y impinge r wa

s analyze d fo r As , Be , Cd , Cr , an d P b du e t o carry-ove r fro m th e secon d nitri c aci d an d hydroge n peroxid e impinger .

4-27

VES01740 9Tabl e 4-21 . Uni t 2 - Result s o f Metal s i n Stac k

Ga s Run l Ru n 3 Ru n 5 Dat e 10-8-1 3 10-10-1 3 10-30-1 3 Tim e 15:40-18:4 3 12:30-15:1 0 12:45-15:3 2 Averag e Volum e Collecte d (dscf ) 84.95 2 78.95 1 79.60 7 Averag e Oxyge n Concentratio n (% ) 10.0 8 10.3 8 10.5 0 Averag e

Mas s Foun d (ng

) Arseni c <0.8 7 <0.99 <1. 0 Berylliu m <0.04 5 <0.030 <0.03 1 Cadmiu m <0.06 3 <0.04 2 <0.04 2 Chromiu m 4.4 1 3.0 5 3.1 1 Lea d <1. 9 <1. 3 <1. 7 Mercur y <17 0 <20 0 <160 Stac k Ga s Concentratio n (ug/dscf ) Arseni c <0.01 0 <0.01 3 <0.01 3 <0.01 2 Berylliu m <0.0005 3 <0.0003 8 <0.0003 9 <0.0004 3 Cadmiu m <0.00074 <0.00053 <0.0005 3 <0.00060 Chromiu m 0.051 9 0.038 6 0.039 1 0.043 2 Lea d <0.02 3 <0.01 6 <0.02 1 <0.02 0 Mercur y <2. 0 <2.5 <2. 0 <2.2 Stac k Ga s Concentratio n (ug/dscm ) Arseni c <0.3 6 . <0.4 4 <0.45 <0.4 2 Berylliu m <0.01 9 <0.01 3 <0.01 4 <0.01 5 Cadmiu m <0.02 6 <0.01 9 <0.01 9 <0.02 1 Chromiu m 1.8 3 1.3

6 1.3

8 1.5

3 Lea d <0.8 0 <0.5 7 <0.74 <0.70 Mercur y <70 <9 0 <7 1 <7 7 Stac k Ga s Concentratio n (ug/dscm , 7 % O2 ) Arseni c <0.4 6 <0.59 <0.60 <0.55 Berylliu m <0.024 <0.01 8 <0.01 8 <0.02 0 Cadmiu m <0.03 4 <0.02 5 <0.02 5 <0.028 Chromiu m 2.3 5 1.8 0 1.8

4 2.0 0 Lea d <1. 0 <0.7 5 <0.98 <0.92 Mercur y <9 0 <12 0 <9

5 <10

0 S V M (Cd , Pb ) <1. 1 <0.7 8 <1. 0 <0.95 L V M (As , Be , Cr ) <2. 8 <2.4 <2. 5 <2. 6 Mercur y <9 0 <120 <9 5 <10

0

4-2 8

VES01741 0Tabl e 4-22 . Uni t 3 - Analytica l Result s o f Metal s i n Stac k

Ga s

Ru n Analyt e Nitri c Aci d PN R & Filte r Nitri c Aci d

& Hydroge n Peroxid e Impinger s Empt y

Impinge r Rins e Potassiu m

Permanganat e Impinge r HC I

Rins e Tota l

2 Arseni c <0.7 4 <0.2 5 <0.9 9
2 Berylliu m <0.01 5 <0.01 5 <0.0 3 2 Cadmiu m <0.02 1 <0.02 1 <0.042 2 Chromiu m 10. 6 0.5 6 11. 2 2 Lea d 28. 6 <0.2 7 <2 9 2
Mercur y <0.0 8 8 1 0.29 0.2 1 2. 5 <84

3 Arseni c <0.7 4 <0.25 <0.9 9
3 Berylliu m <0.01 5 <0.O1 5 <0.0 3 3 Cadmiu m <0.02 1 <0.02 1 <0.04 2 3 Chromiu m 1 1 0.7 9 11. 8 3 Lea d 19. 4 <0.2 7 <20 3
Mercur y <0.08 52. 2 0.2 5 <0.048 2. 6 <5 5

4 Arseni c <0.37 0.8 3 <1. 2

4 Berylliu m <0.01 5 <0.01 5 <0.0 3 4 Cadmiu m 0.9 1 <0.02 1 <0.93 4 Chromiu m 13. 7 0.7 2 14. 4 4 Lea d 15. 7 . 0. 3 1 6 4

Mercur y <0.0 8 5 4 0.1 8 0.1 6 12. 8 <6 7

4-2 9

VES01741 1Tabl e 4-23 . Uni t 3 - Result s o f Metal s i n Stac k

Ga s
Dat e Tim e Ru n 2

10-16-1 3 14:00-16:5 0 Ru n 3

10-17-1 3 12:30-15:2 5 Ru n 4

10-18-1 3 09:35-12:2 0 Averag e Volum e Collecte d (dscf ) 71.70 8 69.01 6 71.54 0 Averag e Oxyge n Concentratio n (% ) 11.1 9 10.7 2 10.87 Averag e

Mas s Foun d (ug ) Arseni c <0.99 <0.9 9 <1.2 Berylliu m <0.03 0 <0.03 0 <0.03 0 Cadmiu m <0.04 2 <0.04 2 <0.9 3 Chromiu m 11. 2 11, 8 14. 4 Lea d <2 9 <20 16. 0 Mercur y <8 4 <55 <6 7 Stac k Ga s Concentratio n (ug/dscf ) Arseni c <0;01 4 <0.01 4 <0.01 7 <0.01 5 Berylliu m <0.0004 2 <0.00043 <0.0004 2 <0.0004

2 Cadmiu m <0.0005 9 <0.0006 1 <0.01 3 <0.004 7 Chromiu m 0.15 6 0.17 1 0.202 0.17 6 Lea d <0.40 <0.29 0.224 <0.3 0 Mercur y <1.2 <0.8 0 <0.9 4 <0.97 Stac k Ga s Concentratio n (ug/dscm ) Arseni c <0.49 <0.5 1 <0.59 <0.5 3 Berylliu m <0.01 5 <0.01 5 <0.01 5 <0.01 5 Cadmiu m <0.02 1 <0.02 1 <0.4 6 <0.1 7 Chromiu m 5.5 0 6.0 3 7.1 2 6.22 Lea d <1 4 <1 0 7.9 0 <1 1 Mercur y <41 <2 8 <3

3 <3

4 Stac k Ga s Concentratio n (ug/dscm , 7 % 0 2 ) Arseni c <0.7 0 <0.6 9 <0.8 2 <0.74 Berylliu m <0.02 1 <0.02 1 <0.02 1 <0.02 1 Cadmiu m <0.03 0 <0.02 9 <0.6 4 <0.2

3 Chromiu m 7.87 8.2 3 9.8

7 8.6 6 Lea d <2 0 <1 4 10. 9 <1 5 Mercur y <5 9 <3 9 <46 <4 8 SVM(Cd,Pb ) <2 0 <1 4 <1 2 <1 5 L V M (As , Be , Cr ) <8. 6 <8. 9 <1 1 <9. 4 Mercur y <5 9 <39 <46 <4 8

4-3 0

VES01741 2Metal s HW C MAC T Sampl e Calculation , ug/dsc m @ 7 % 0 2 Tota l Mas s (ug ) = Su m o f Masse s i n Individua l Sampl e Fraction s (See Tabl e 4-20) Uni t 2 - Ru n 1 , Arseni c

Arseni c Mas s (ug

) Metal s Stack Concentratio n [ug/dscf )

Metal s Stac

k Concentratio n (ug/dscf ) = Sampl e Volum e (dscf ) <0.8 7 n g = <0.01 0 84.95 2 dsc f

Metal s Stack Concentratio n (pg/dscm ) Arseni c Stac k Concentratio n (pg/dscf )
Metai s Stack Concentratio n (ug/dscm ) = <0.0l 0 pg/dsc f 35.31 5 dscf 1 dsc m 35.31 5 dsc

f 1 dsc m = <0.3

6

Metal s Stac

k Concentratio n (pg/dsc m

@7%0 2 ) Metal s Stac

k Concentratio n (pg/dsc m

<§ > 7 % 0 2 ) Arseni c Stac k Concentratio n (ug/dscm )

<0.36 (21 % - 7% ) (21 % - Meas . 0 2 ) (21-7 ) (21-10.08 ) = <0.4 6

4-3 1

VES01741 3Tabl e 4-24 . Uni t 4 - Analytica l Result s o f Metal s i n Stac k

Ga s

Ru n Analyt e Nitri c Aci d PN R & Filte r Nitri c Aci d

& Hydroge n Peroxid e Impinger s Empt y

Impinge r Rins e Potassiu m

Permanganat e Impinge r HC I

Rins e Tota l

1 Arseni c 9. 1 <0.2 5 <9. 4
1 Berylliu m <0.01 5 <0.01 5 <0.0 3 1 Cadmiu m 0.3 3 <0.02 1 <0.3 5 1 Chiomiu m 5. 5 0.82 6.3 2 1 Lea d 10. 4 0.7 1 11. 1 1
Mercur y <0.0 8 9 <0.1 2 <0.04 8 0.2 2 <9. 5

2 Arseni c 7. 9 <0.25 <8. 2
2 Berylliu m <0.01 5 <0.01 5 <0.0 3 2 Cadmiu m 0.1 5 <0.02 1 <0.1 7 2 Chromiu m 4. 2 0.6 6 4.8 6 2 Lea d 5. 4 0.4 2 5.82 2
Mercur y <0.0 8 10.4 <0.1 2 <0.047 <0.08 2 <1 1

3 Arseni c 2. 7 <0.2 5 < 3
3 Berylliu m <0.01 5 <0.01 5 <0.0 3 3 Cadmiu m 0.06 9 <0.02 1 <0.0 9 3 Chromiu m 6. 9 0.62 7.5 2 3 Lea d 1 4 0.4 4 14. 4 3
Mercur y <0.0 8 19. 5 <0.1 2 <0.04 7 0.7 5 <20

4-3 2

VES01741 4Tabl e 4-25 . Uni t 4 - Result s o f Metal s i n Stac k Ga s
Dat e Time . Ru n 1

10-23-1 3 12:36-15:2 0 Ru n 2 10-24-1 3 12:35-15:1 5 Ru n 3 10-25-1 3 13:35-16:1 1 Averag e Volum e Collecte d (dscf ) 76.06 S 76.49 8 76.84 6 Averag e Oxyge n Concentratio n (% ) 12.27 12.3 7 12.0 0 Averag e

Mas s Foun d (ug ) Arseni c <9. 4 <8. 2 <3. 0 Berylliu m <0.03 0 <0.O3 0 <0.03 0 Cadmiu m <0.3 5 <0.1 7 <0.09 0 Chromiu m 6.3 2 4.8 6 7.5 2 Lea d 11. 1 5.8 2 14. 4 Mercur y <9. 5 <1 1 <2 0 Stac k Ga s Concentratio n (ug/dscf ) Arseni c <0.1 2 <0.1 1 <0.03 8 <0.08 9 Berylliu m <0.0003 9 <0.0003 9 <0.0003 9 <0.0003 9 Cadmiu m <0.004 6 <0.0022 <0.001 2 <0.002 7 Chromiu m ,0.083 1 0.063 5 0.097 9 0.081 5 Lea d 0.14 6 0.076 1 0.18 8 0.13 7 Mercur y • <0.1 2 <0.1 4 <0.2 7 <0.1 8 Stac k Ga s Concentratio n (ng/dscm ) Arseni c <4. 3 <3. 8 <1.4 <3.2 Berylliu m <0.01 4 <0.01 4 <0.01 4 <0.01 4 Cadmiu m <0.1 6 <0.07 9 <0.04 1 <0.094 Chromiu m 2.9 3 2.2 4 3.46 2.8 8 Lea d 5.1 6 2.6 9 6.64 4.83 Mercur y <4. 4 <5. 0 <9.4 <6. 3 Stac k Ga s Concentratio n (ug/dscm , 7% Oj ) Arseni c <7. 0 <6. 1 <2. 1 <5. 1 Berylliu m <0.022 <0.023 <0.022 <0.022 Cadmiu m <0.26 <0.1 3 <0.065 <0.1 5 Chromiu m 4.73 3.6 6 5.40 4.5 9 Lea d 8.3 1 4.3 8 10. 4 7.6 8 Mercur y <7. 1 <8. 1 <15 <10. 0 S V M (Cd , Pb ) <8. 6 <4. 5 <1 0 <7. 8 L V M (As , Be , Cr ) <1 2 <9. 8 <7.5 <9. 7 Mercur y <7. 1 <8. 1 <15 <10. 0

4-3 3

VES01741 54.2. 4 Dioxins/Furan s i n Stac k Ga s Stac k ga s sample s fo r

determination o f

dioxins/furan s wer

e collecte dusin g SW-84 6 Metho d0023 A an dwer

e analyze dusin g SW-84 6 Metho d8290 , ahig h resolutio n ga s chromatograph

y (HRGC ) wit

h hig h resolutio n mas s spectroscopy (HRMS ) analytica l technique . Th e samplin g trai n wa

s recovere dt

o provid e th

e followin g fractions :

• Combine dprob e an

dnozzl e rins e wit h acetone , methylen e chloride andtoluene (PNR) ;

• Filte r (FILT) ;

• Condense

r rins e wit h acetone , methylene chloride , an dtoluene (CR) ; an d

• XA D sorben

t (XAD) . Component s recovere dfro mth e trai n wer

e combine da

s follows :

• Combinatio n o f

th e filte r an dal l th e rinse s betwee

n the nozzl e an

dfilter ; and
• Combinatio n o f

th e sorben t an dal l th e rinse s betwee

n the filte r

an dsorbent . Afte r sampl e cleanu

p an dconcentratio n procedure s a t th e analytical laboratory , a

n aliquo t o f th e front-hal f

extract s (i.e. , PN Ran

dfilter ) i s combine dan

danalyze dusin g SW-84 6 Metho d 829 0 fo r dioxins/furan s separat

e fro mth e back-hal f

components (i.e. , condense r rinses , XA D sorbent) . Dioxins/furan s result s ar e presented i n Tabl e 4-2 6 fo r Uni t 2 , Tabl e 4-2

7 fo r Uni t 3 , an d Tabl e 4-2 8 fo r

Uni t 4 . Th e concentration o f

oxyge n measured usin g CEM S an dEP A Metho d3 A durin g th e secondhal f

o f th e ru n ar e show n i n th

e tables , an

dth e concentratio n o f

dioxins/furan s correcte dt

o 7 % O 2 i s shown . Th e analytical result s fo r th e dioxins/furan s analyse s ar e include di n Appendi x G2 . Result s fo r

dioxins/furan s ar

e convertedt

o 2,3,7,8-tetrachlorodibenzo-dioxi n toxicity equivalent s (TEQ) . Not e tha

t Sectio n §1208(b)(l)(iii ) o f the HW C MAC T state s tha t non-detect

s (al l result s precede d b y a"<" ) o

f dioxins/furan s ca

n b e assumed t

o be a t zer o concentrations . Additionally , result s followe db y a

n "* " ar e denote d a s Estimate dPossibl e Maximu mConcentrations , andar e likewis e no t

include di n th

e calculatio n o f

total mass .

4-3 4

VES01741 6Tabl e 4-26 . Uni t 2 - Result s o f Dioxins/Furan s i n Stac k Ga s Dat e Tim e Run l 10-8-1 3 15:40-18:5

5 Ru n 3 10-10-1 3 12:30-15:4

0 Ru n 5 10-30-13 12:45-16:0

2 Volum e Collected (dscf ) 121.16 4 119.56 8 124.92 1 Oxygen Concentration (% ) 10.0 8 10.3 8 10.5 0 Analyt e Toxicity Equivalen tFactor 1 Mas s Foun d (pg) * Analyt e Toxicity Equivalen tFactor 1 PNR/Filte r XAD/Con d Su m PNK/FUte r XAD/Con d Su m PNR/Filte r XAD/Con d Sum 2,3,7,8-TCD D 1 <2.9 3 <3.

6 <6.

5 <2.

8 <

3 <5.

8 <4.

6 <4.

7 <9.

3 1,2,3,7,8-PcCD

D 0.

5 <1. 4 7.2 * <8. 6 <1.

6 6.9 * <8. 5 <2.1 2 3 * <25. 1 1,2,3,4,7,8-HxCDD 0. 1 <1. 2 7.

3 <8.

5 <1.

2 5 <6. 2 <1.

7 2

0 <21.

7 1,2,3,6,7,8-HxCD

D 0. 1 <1. 2 1

4 <15.

2 <1.

2 1

5 <16.

2 <1.

6 3

9 <40.

6 1,2,3,7,8,9-HxCD

D 0. 1 <1. 2 1

2 <13.

2 <1.

2 1

7 <18.

2 <1.

7 4

8 <49.

7 1,2,3,4,6,7,8-HpCD

D 0.0

1 3.3* " 8 2 85.3 * 2. 9 9

4 96.9 < 2 25

0 <25

2 OCD D 0.00 1 9. 1 11 0 119. 1 8. 1 * 12 0 128. 1 * 7. 7 35

0 357.

7 2,3,7,8-TCD F 0.1 <1. 7 9.

5 <11.

2 <

2 9.

3 <11.

3 <

3 4

9 <5

2 1,2,3,7,8-PeCD

F 0.0

5 <1. 1 11 * <I2. 1 <1. 1 12 * <13.1 <2. 1 72 * <74.1 2,3,4,7,8-PeCDF 0. 5 <1. 2 1

6 <17.

2 <1.1 1 8 <19. 1 <2.1 110 * <112. 1 1,2,3,4,7,8-HxCDF 0. 1 <0.6 9 41 * <41.6 9 <0.8

2 46 * <46.8 2 <1.1 190 * <191. 1 1,2,3,6,7,8-HxCDF 0.1 <0.6 1 17 * <17.61 <0.7 3 17 * <17.7 3 <

1 130 * <13 1 1,2,3,7,8,9-HxCDF 0. 1 <0.7 5 2.

9 <3.6

5 <0.8

9 2. 1 <2.9 9 <1.

2 1

2 <13.

2 2,3,4,6,7,8-HxCD F 0. 1 <0.6 5 13 * <13.6 5 <0.7

7 16 * <16.7 7 <1.

1 13

0 <131. 1 1,2,3,4,6,7,8-HpCDF 0.01 5 * 7 9 84 * 4 8 9 9

3 2.4 * 78 0 782.

4 * 1,2,3,4,7,8,9-HpCDF 0.0 1 <1. 7 1

0 <11.

7 <1.

8 1

2 <13.

8 <1.

7 11

0 <111.

7 OCD F 0.001 11 * 11 0 12

1 * 1 1 98 * 109 * 9. 7 630 * 639. 7 * Tota l Toxicit

y Equivalent

s 0.0091 0 14. 5 14.

5 0.080

0 15.

9 16.

0 0.017

4 41.6 41.6 Concentratio n (n

g TEO/dscf

) 0.00012 0 0.00013 4 0.00033 3 Concentratio n (n

g TEQ/dscm ) 0.0042 3 0.0047 2 0.011 8 Concentratio n (n

g TEQ/dsc m @ 1% 0,) 0.0054 3 0.0062 4 0.015 7 Average Concentratio n (n g TEQ/dsc m ® 7% O J 0.00912

1 Toxi c Equivalenc

y Facto r (TEF ) a

s develope

d in : ^Interi

m Procedur

e fo rEstimating Risks Associated Wit h Exposure

s t o Mixtures of

Chlorinate

d Diben2x>p-Dioxi

n an d -Dibenzofuran

s (CDD s an

d CDFs ) an

d 198 9 Update" , Marc h 1989 ; Va n de n Berg , M. , e

tal . ^Toxi c Equivalenc y Factor s (TEFs ) fo rPCBs , PCDDs , PCDF s fo rHuman s an d "Wildlife " Environmenta l Healt h Perspectives , Volum e 106

, Numbe r 12 , December 1998. , a

s directe d b y th e Preambl

e t o th e HW C MACT . 7Result

s followe d b y a

n ar e Estimated Maximum Possible Concentration s (EMPCs) . I n accordanc

e wit h Section §1208(b)(l)(iii ) of th e HW C MACT , non-detect s o f dioxins/furan

s ar e assume d t o b e a t2;er o concentrations . I n accordanc

e wit h th e USEP A Analytical Service s Branc h documen

tNational

Functional

Guidelines forChlorinated Dibenzo-p-Dioxins and Chlorinated

Dibenzofurans Data Review, EMPC s ar e no tinclude d in th e calculation o f

TEFs .

4-3 5Dioxins/Furan s HW C MAC T Sampl e Calculatio n n g TEQ/dsc m @ 7

% 0 2 (continued ) Uni t 2 - Ru n 1

Su m o f al l TE Q Value s (pg

) " 9 Stac k Concentratio n (n g TEQ/dscf) = X Sampl e Volum e .„ 3 (dscf ) 1 0 P 9 14.5pgTE Q 1 n g Stac k Concentratio n (n g TEQ/dscf ) = X , = 0.00012 0 121.164 dsc

f Wpg

Concentratio n 35.31 5 dscf Stac k Concentratio n (n g TEQ/dscm ) = X (ng TEQ/dscf

) 1 dsc m

35.31 5 dscf Stac k Concentratio n (n g TEQ/dscm ) = 0.00012 0 X = 0.0042 3 1 dsc m

Concentratio n f21%-7% ) Stac k Concentratio n (n g TEQ/dsc m @ 7 % 0 2 ) = X

(n g TEQ/dscm ) (21 % - Meas . 0 2 ) 0.00423 Stac k Concentratio n (n g TEQ/dsc m @ 7 % 0 2 ) = X (2 1 - 7) = 0.0054 3 (21-10.08 )

4-3 6

VES01741 8Tabl e 4-27 . Uni t 3 - Result s o f Dioxins/Furan s i n Stac k Ga s Date Tim e Ru n 2

10-16-1 3 14:00-17:2

0 Ru n 3 10-17-13 12:30-15:5

5 Ru n 4 10-18-13 09:35-12:5

0 Volum e Collecte d (dscf ) 10630 3 102.72 4 102.62 4 Oxygen Concentratio n (% ) 11.1 9 10.7 2 10.8 7 Analyte Toxicit y EquivalentFactor 1 Mas s Foun d (pg) 2 Analyte Toxicit y EquivalentFactor 1 PNR/Filte r XAD/Con d Su m PNR/Filte r XAD/Con d Su m PNR/Filter XAD/Con d Su m 2,3,7,8-TCD D 1 <0.14 J 1.

1 * <1.2

4 <0.

7 3.

8 * <4.

5 <0.2

9 1.9 * <2.1 9 1,2,3,7,8-PeCD

D 0.

5 0.2 3 4.8 * 5.03 * 1.4 * 12 * 13.4 * <0.1 5 5 * <5.1 5 1,2,3,4,7,8-HxCDD 0. 1 <0.1 5 2.

6 <2.7

5 <0.

7 4. 1 * <4. 8 <0.4

2 3 <3.4 2 1,2,3,6,7,8-HxCDD 0. 1 0.2

2 * * 5.

3 5.52 * <0.6 7 1 1 * <11.6 7 <0.

4 5. 1 * <5. 5 1,2,3,7,8,9-HxCDD 0.1 0.4 1 * 5.

6 6.01 * 1.5 * 12 * 13.5 * 1.4 * 8.1 9.5 * 1,2,3,4,6,7,8-HpCDD 0.0 1 1.5 * 2 9 30.5 * 1.6 * 5 7 58.6 * 1. 9 2

9 30.9 OCD D 0.00 1 7.7 * 3 7 44.7 * 1 2 4 0 5 2 5.6 * 2 8 33.6 * 2,3,7,8-TCD F 0.1 0.2 9 6.8 * 7.09 * <0.4 7 1

4 <14.4

7 <0.2

9 1

1 <11.2

9 1,2,3,7,8-PeCD

F 0.0

5 <0.1 1 9. 1 * <9.2 1 <0.7

8 20 * <20.7 8 <0.3 1 12 * <12.31 2,3,4,7,8-PeCDF 0. 5 <o. u 19 * <19.1 1 <0.7 8 36 * <36.7 8 <0.31 27 * <27.31 1,2,3,4,7,8-HxCDF 0.1 0.48 * 25 * 25.48 * 2.5 * 6 1 * 63.5 * 0.62 * 26 * 26.62 * 1,2,3,6,7,8-HxCDF 0. 1 0.22 * 1 1 * 11.22 * <0.5 7 23 * <23.5 7 0.29 * 12 * 12.2 9 * 1,2,3,7,8,9-HxCDF 0. 1 0. 7 0.9 * 1.6 * 1.4 * 2.4 * 3.8 * 0.5 6 * 1.2 * 1.76 * 2,3,4,6,7,8-HxCD F 0. 1 0.42 * 11 * 11.42 * 1.3 * 21 * 22. 3 * 0.55 * 12 * 12.5 5 * 1,2,3,4,6,7,8-HpCDF 0.01 1. 1 * 2

8 29. 1 * <0.6 3 4

3 <43.6

3 0.78 * 2 2 22.7

8 * 1,2,3,4,7,8,9-HpCDF 0.01 0.48 * 3.8 * 4.28 * 1.9 * 5 * 6.9 * 0.66 * 4. 4 5.06 * OCD F 0.001 3. 8 8.5 * 12.3 * 5. 8 9.7 * 15.5 * 4. 7 5.7 * 10.4 * Total Toxicit

y Equivalent

s 0.218 1.9 6 2.1

7 . 0.017

8 2.4

4 2.4

6 0.023

7 2.7

9 2.8

2 Concentratio n (n

g TEQ/dscf

) 0.000020 5 0.000023 9 0.000027 4 Concentratio n (n

g TEQ/dscm ) 0.00072 2 0.00084 5 0.00096 9 Concentratio n (n

g TEQ/dsc m @ 7

% 0 3 ) 0.0010 3 0.00115 0.0013 4 Average Concentratio n (n g TEQ/dsc m @ 7

% O J 0.0011 8

1 Toxi c Equivalenc

y Facto r (TEF ) a

s develope

d in : "Interi

m Procedur

e fo r Estimatin

g Risk s Associated Wit h Expasure

s t o Mixture

s o f .Chlorinate

d Dibenzo-p-Dioxi n an d -Dibenzofuran

s (CDD s an d CDFs ) an

d 198 9 Update" , March 1989 ; Va n de n Berg , M , e

tal . "Toxi c Equivalenc y Factor s (TEFs ) fo r PCBs , PCDDs , PCDF s for Human s an d Wildlife " Environmenta l Healt h Perspectives , Volum e 106

, Number 12

, Decembe

r 1998. , a

s directe d b y th e Preambl

e t o th e HW C MACT .
1 Result

s followe d b y a

n "* " ar e Estimate

d Maximum Possibl e Concentration s (EMPCs) . 3 I n accordanc

e wit h Section §1208(b)(l)(iii ) o f th e HW C MACT , non-detect s o f dioxins/furan

s ar e assume d t o b e a tzer o concentrations . 4I n accordanc

e wit h th e USEP A Analytical Services Branc h documen

tNational

Functional

Guidelines forChlorinated Dibenzo-p-Dioxins and Chlorinated

Dibenzofurans Data Review, EMPC s ar e no tincluded i n th

e calculation of

TEFs .

4-3 7Tabl e 4-28 . Uni t 4 - Result s o f Dioxins/Furan s i n Stac k Ga s Dat e Tim e Run l

10-23-1 3 12:36-15:5

0 Ru n 2 10-24-13 12:35-15:4

5 Ru n 3 1 10-25-13 13:35-16:4 1 Volum e Collected (dscf ) 110.79 1 112.80 3 115.28 4 Oxyge n Concentration (% ) 12.2 7 12.3 7 12.0 0 1 Analyt e Toxicity EquivalentFactor 1 Mas s Foun d (pg) i | Analyt e Toxicity EquivalentFactor 1 PNR/Filte r XAD/Con d Sum PNR/Filte r XAD/Con d Su m PNR/Filter XAD/Con d Su m 2,3,7,8-TCD D 1 <4.9 * 7 * <11. 9 <4.3 ' 9.5 * <13. 8 <2.

5 8.2 * <10. 7 1,2,3,7,8-PeCD

D 0.

5 <1. 9 120 * <121. 9 <2.

2 120 * <122. 2 2 120 * 122 * 1,2,3,4,7,8-HxCD

D 0. 1 < 2 23

0 <23

2 . 4.

3 23

0 234.

3 3.9 * 23 0 233.9 * 1,2,3,6,7,8-HxCD

D 0. 1 1 3 * * 99

0 1003 * 9.4 * 93 0 939.

4 * 1

6 94

0 95

6 1,2,3,7,8,9-HxCD

D 0.1 10 * 64 0 650 * 12 * 65 0 662 * 1 2 63

0 64

2 1,2,3,4,6,7,8-HpCD

D 0.0

1 16 0 610

0 626

0 13

0 550

0 563

0 16

0 590

0 606

0 OCD D 0.001 17 0 360

0 377

0 15

0 350

0 365

0 19

0 410

0 429

0 2,3,7,8-TCD F 0.1 3. 8 * 7

8 81.8 * <2. 9 7

0 <72.

9 3.6 * 7 0 73.6 * 1,2,3,7,8-PcCD

F 0.0

5 <

2 130 * <13 2 <2. 1 120 * <122. 1 <1. 2 110 * <111. 2 2,3,4,7,8-PeCDF 0. 5 4.5 * 550 * 554. 5 * <2.

2 510 * <512. 2 4.7 * 430 * 434. 7 * 1,2,3,4,7,8-HxCDF 0.1 4.7 * 570 * 574. 7 * 5 510 * 515 * 3.6 * 26 0 263.6 * 1,2,3,6,7,8-HxCDF 0. 1 2.3 * 310 * 312. 3 * 2.7 * 290 * 292. 7 * 2.6 * 300 * 302. 6 * ' 1,2,3,7,8,9-HxCDF 0. 1 <1. 3 3

9 * <40.

3 <1.

4 38 * <39. 4 <0,8

2 43 * <43.8 2 2,3,4,6,7,8-HxCD F 0. 1 7.9 * 600 * 607.9 * 6. 9 510 * 516. 9 * 8.4 * 560 * 568. 4 * 1,2,3,4,6,7,8-HpCDF 0.0 1 1

5 76

0 77

5 10 * 71 0 720 * 1 7 72

0 73

7 1,2,3,4,7,8,9-HpCDF 0.0 1 4. 1 * 18 0 184. 1 * 3.5 * 16 0 163.

5 * 5.9 * 20 0 205.

9 * OCD F 0.00 1 12 * 140 * 152 * 10 * 14 0 150 * 1 1 * 160 * 17 1 * Tota l Toxicit

y Equivalent

s 1.9

2 26

8 27

0 3.0

7 25

5 25

8 5.7

6 28

5 291 Concentratio n (n

g TEQ/dscf

) 0.0024 3 0.0022 9 0.0025 2 Concentratio n (n

g TEQ/dscm ) 0.086 0 0.080 9 0.089 2 Concentratio n (n

g TEQ/dsc m @ 7

% O J 0.13 8 0.13 2 0.13 9 Averag e Concentratio n (n

g TEQ/dsc m @ 7

% 0 2 ) 0.13 7

' Toxi c Equivalenc

y Facto r (TEF ) a

s develope

d in : "Interi

m Procedur

e fo r Estimatin

g Risk s Associated Wit

h Exposure

s t o Mixtures o f

Chlorinate

d Dibenzo-p-Dioxi n an d -Dibenzofuran

s (CDD s and CDFs ) an

d 198 9 Update" , Marc h 1989 ; Va n de n Berg , M. , e

tal . "Toxi c Equivalenc y Factor s (TEFs ) fo r PCBs , PCDDs , PCDF s fo r Human s an d Wildlife " Environmenta l Healt h Perspectives , Volum e 106, Numbe

r 12 , Decembe

r 1998. , a

s directe d b y th e Preambl

e t o th e HW C MACT . 2Result

s followed b

y a n "* " ar e Estimated Maximu

m Possible Concentration s flEMPCs).

3 I n accordanc

e wit h Section §1208(b)(l)(iii ) of th e HW C MACT , non-detect s o f dioxins/furan

s ar e assume d t o b e a tzer o concentrations . * I n accoidanc

e wit h th e USEP A Analytical Service s Branc h docnmen

tNational

Functional

Guidelines for

Chlorinated

Dibenzo-p-Dioxins and Chlorinated

Dibenzofurans Data Review, EMPC s ar e no tinclude d i n th e calculation o f

TEFs .

4-3 84.2. 5 TH C i n Stac k Ga s Tota l hydrocarbon s (THC ) wer e monitore di n fh e stac

k ga s usin g EP A Metho d25A . TH C was monitore dthroughou t th e secon dhal f

o f eac h run . Stack

ga s concentration s o f

TH C ar e presente d i n Tabl e 4-2 9 fo r Uni t 2 , Tabl e 4-3 0 fo r

Uni t 3 , an dTabl e 4-3 1 fo r

Uni t 4 . Th e concentratio n o f

oxyge n measuredusin g CEM S an dEP A Metho d3 A durin g the secondhal f o f th e ru n ar

e shown i n th

e tables , an d th

e concentratio n o f

TH C correcte dt

o 7 % O 2 i s shown . Tabl e 4-29 . Uni t 2 - Result s fo r TH C i n Stac k Ga s
Dat e Tim e Run l

10-8-1 3 15:40-18:5 5 Ru n 3

10-10-1 3 12:3 0 -15:4 0 Ru n 5

10-30-1 3 12:45 -16:0 2 T H C (ppmv , wet , a s propane ) 0.6 8 0.0 7 0.2 1

Moistur e (%) 44. 7 45. 3 42. 9 T H C (ppmv , dry , a s propane ) 1. 2 0.1 3 0.3 7 Oxyge n Concentratio n (% ) 10.0 8 10.3 8 10.5 0 T H C (ppmv , dry , a s propane , correcte d t o 7 % 0 2 ) 1. 6 0.1 8 0.4 9 Averag e TH C (ppmv , dry , a s propane , correcte d to 7 % 0 2 ) 0.7 5

TH C HW C MAC T Sampl e Calculatio n ppmv d @ 7% O 2 (continued ) Uni t 2 - Ru n 5 

# 1 (l-( % Moisture/100%) )

1
= 0.37 (1-(42.9%/100%) )
(21 % - 7%

) (21 % - Meas . 0 2 ) (21-7 )
= 0.49 (21-10.50 ) TH C Concentratio n TH C Concentratio n (ppmvd ) = X (ppmv)
Th e Concentratio n (ppmvd ) = 0.2 1 ppm v

TH C Concentratio n TH C Concentratio n (ppmvd ) = , „ X (ppmvd )
TH C Concentratio n (ppmvd ) = 0.3 7

4-3 9Tabl e 4-30 . Uni t 3 - Result s fo r TH C i n Stac k Ga s Ru n 2 Ru n 3 Ru n 4 Dat e 10-16-1 3 10-17-1 3 10-18-1 3 Tim e 14:00 -17:2 0 12:3 0 -15:5 5 09:3 5 -12:5 0 T H C (ppmv , wet , a s propane ) 0.1 8 0.1 1 0.23

Moistur e (%

) 42. 9 44. 4 43. 7 T H C (ppmv , dry , a s propane ) 0.3 1 0.1 9 0.4 1 Oxyge n Concentratio n (% ) 11.1 9 10.7 2 10.87 T H C (ppmv , dry , a s propane , correcte d t o 7 % 0 2 ) 0.4 4 0.26 0.57 Averag e TH C (ppmv , dry , a s propane , correcte d t o 7 % 0 2 ) 0.4 3

Tabl e 4-31 . Uni t 4 - Result s fo r TH C i n Stac k Ga s Run l Ru n 2 Ru n 3 Dat e 10-23-1 3 10-24-1 3 10-25-1 3 Tim e 12:36-15:5 0 12:3 5 -15:4 5 13:3 5 -16:4 1 T H C (ppmv , wet , a s propane ) 0.1 9 0.2 3 0.33 Moistur e (%

) 39. 2 38. 3 39. 3 T H C (ppmv , dry , a s propane ) 0.3 2 0.37 0.5 4 Oxyge n Concentratio n (% ) 12.27 12.3 7 12.00 T H C (ppmv , dry , a s propane , correcte d t o 7 % 0_ ) 0.5 1 0.60 0.8 5 Averag e TH C (ppmv , dry , a s propane , correcte d t o 7 % 0 2 ) 0.65

4-4 0

VES01742 24. 3 Chlorine , Ash , an d Metal s Feedrate s Thi s sectio n present

s calculate dvalue s usin g th e analytical result s presente d previously , wast e feedrates , an dspikin g feedrates . Feedrate s ar e calculate dfor :

• Tota l Chlorine/Chloride ;
• Ash ; an d

• Metals . I n thos e circumstance s wher e aconstituen

t i s not detecte d i n awast

e fee d(i.e. , i s no t analyze dabove th e detection limit) , th e concentratio n o f

tha t paramete r i s treated a

s zer o "0 " i n th e calculatio n o f

th e feedrat e o f tha t constituen

t tha t become s a

n OP L fo r

tha t parameter . 4.3. 1 Chlorin e Feedrat e Feedrat e o f tota l chlorin e an dchlorid e (i.e. , chlorine ) i s a n OP L fo r

th e emissio n standard s fo r

hydrogen chloride an dchlorin e ga s (HCI/CI2 ) an

dfo r SV M an dLVM . Th e feedrat

e o f chlorin e ha s been determineddurin g bot h the HCI /CI 2 andmetal s (i.e. , SV M andLVM ) stac k samplin g i n th

e secondpar

t o f each run . Tabl e 4-3 2 present s th e chlorin e feedrate s calculate d durin g bot

h th e HCI /Q 2 an

dmetal s stack

samplin g fo r

Uni t 2 . Chlorin e feedrate s fo r Uni t 3 ar e presented i n Tabl e 4-33 , an dchlorin e feedrate s fo r

Uni t 4 ar e presented i n Tabl e 4-34 . Fo r th e calculatio n o f

th e chlorin e feedrate , th

e weigh t o f th e Containerize dSoli dWast e usedto calculat

e th e feedrate s o f

chlorin e was reduce db y th e weight o f th e box , andth

e spikin g material s lea

dnitrate , hexachloroethane , an dth e solutio n o f

mercuri c nitrat

e t o determin

e th e feedrat e o f Containerize dSoli dWast e tha t wa s analyze dfo r

chlorine . 4.3. 2 As h Feedrat e Feedrat e o f as h i s a n OP L fo r th e emissio n standar

d fo r particulat e matter . Th e feedrat

e o f as h has bee

n determinedduring th

e particulate matte

r stac k samplin g i n the firs t

par t o f each run . Tabl e 4-3 5 presents th

e ash feedrat

e calculate ddurin g stac

k samplin g fo r

particulat

e matte r fo r Uni t 2 . As h feedrate s fo r

Uni t 3 ar e presente d i n Tabl e 4-36 , an das h feedrate s fo r

Uni t 4 ar e presente d i n Tabl e 4-37 .

4-4 1

VES01742 3Tabl e 4-32 . Uni t 2 - Chlorin e Feedrat e HCI/Cl , Stac

k Samplin g Metal s Stac k Samplin g Run l Ru n 3 Run S Run l Ru n 3 Ru n 5 10-8-1 3 10-10-13 10-30-1 3 10-8-13 10-10-1 3 10-30-13 15:4 0 -16:4 0 12:30-13:3 0 12:4 5 -13:45 15:4

0 -18:43 12:3

0 -15:1 0 12:4

5 -15:3 2 Feedrat e (lbs/hr ) 1,422. 1 1,500. 9 1,451.

9 1,474.

6 1,513.

3 1,396.

5 Low-Bt u Liqui d Wast

e Chlorin

e Concentratio

n (mg/kg

) 34

0 40

4 34

0 34

7 36

4 35

7 Chlorin e Feedrat

e (Ib/hr ) 0.4

8 0.6

1 0.4

9 0.5

1 0.5

5 0.5

0 Feedrat e (lbs/hr ) 1,370.

8 1,098.

7 1,200.

0 1,289. 1 1,098. 9 1,164.

6 High-Bt u Liqui d Wast

e Chlorin

e Concentratio

n (mg/kg

) 6,96

0 3,26

0 3,50

0 7,14

0 3,210 3,58 0 High-Bt Chlorin e Feedrat

e (lb/hr ) 9.5

4 3.5

8 4.2

0 9.2

0 3.5

3 4.1 7 Feedrat e (lbs/hr ) 485.

9 398.

2 440.

8 432.6 425. 4 445.

3 Specialt y Liqui d Wast

e Chlorin

e Concentratio

n (mg/kg

) 10

5 13

0 10

6 15

9 12

4 92.

4 Specialt Chlorin e Feedrat

e (Ib/hr ) 0.0

5 0.0

5 0.0

5 0.0

7 0.0

5 • 0.0

4 Feedrat e (lbs/hr ) 540.

0 534.3. 535. 7 • 547.0 536. 1 542. 4 Containerize

d Soli d Waste 1 Chlorin

e Concentratio

n (mg/kg

) 18

4 34

5 34

6 16

7 49

9 39

6 Chlorin e Feedrat e (lb/hr ) 0.1

0 0.1 8 0.1 9 0.0

9 0.2

7 0.21 Chlorin e Spikin g Chlorin

e Feedrat e (lb/hr ) 197.

9 203. 1 197. 9 199.

7 199.

2 200.

2 Tota l Chlorin e Feedrat e (lb/hr ) 208.0 207. 5 202.

8 209.6 203. 6 205. 1 Average Chlorin e Feedrat e (lb/hr) 206. 1 206. 1 Th e weigh

to f th e Containerize

d Soli d Wast

e use d t o calculat

e th e feedrate

s o f chlorin e an d metal s ha s bee n reduce d b y th e weigh tof th e box , an d th e spiking material

s lea d nitrate, hexachloroethane

, an d th e solutio n of mercuric nitrate

.

4-4 2Tabl e 4-33 . Uni t 3 - Chlorin e Feedrat e HC1/C1 2Stac

k Samplmg Metal s Stac k Samplin g Ru n 2 Ru n 3 Ru n 4 Ru n 2 Ru n 3 Ru n 4 10-16-1 3 10-17-1

3 10-18-1

3 10-16-13 10-17-1 3 10-18-13 14:00-15:00 12:3

0 -13:3 3 09:3

5 -10:3 5 14:0

0 -16:5 0 12:3

0 -15:25 09:3

5 -12:2 0 I^)W-Bt u Liqui d Wast

e Feedrat e (lbs/hr ) 1,783.

5 1,563.

4 1,725.

3 1,787.

6 1,685.

3 1,707.

4 I^)W-Bt u Liqui d Wast

e Chlorin

e Concentratio

n (mg/kg

) 56

3 40

9 , 38

8 41 9 42 9 40

8 I^)W-Bt Chlorin e Feedrat

e (lb/hr ) 1.0

0 0.6

4 0.6

7 0.7

5 0.7

2 0.7

0 High-Bt u Liqui d Wast

e Feedrat e (lbs/hr ) 977.

2 1,151.

9 1,163.

5 1,043.

9 1,166.

5 1,197.

7 High-Bt u Liqui d Wast

e Chlorin

e Concentratio

n (mg/kg

) 2,46

0 1,69

0 1,91

0 2,72

0 1,65

0 1,81

0 High-Bt Chlorin e Feedrat e (lb/hr ) 2.4

0 1.9

5 2.2

2 2.8

4 1.9

2 2.1

7 Specialt y Liqui d Wast

e Feedrat e (lbs/hr ) 177.

5 407.

7 248.

8 202.9 350. 0 244.

8 Specialt y Liqui d Wast

e Chlorin

e Concentratio

n (mg/kg

) 1,48

0 10

1 11

3 69

6 12

5 12

7 Specialt Chlorin e Feedrat

e (lb/hr ) 0.2

6 0.0

4 0.0

3 0.1 4 0.0 4 0.0

3 Containerize

d Soli d Waste 1 Feedrat e (lbs/hr ) 550.

6 539.

6 516.

5 541.9 536. 5 523.

9 Containerize

d Soli d Waste 1 Chlorine Concentratio n (mg/kg

) 48

2 11

5 38

2 19

5 27

1 25

5 Containerize

d Soli d Waste 1 Chlorin

e Feedrat e (Ib/hr ) 0.2

7 0.0

6 0.2

0 0.1 1 0.1 5 0.13 Chlorin e Spikin g Chlorin

e Feedrat e (lb/hr ) 203. 1 203. 3 197.

9 200.

3 201.

7 200.

7 Tota l Chlorin e Feedrat e (lb/hr) 207.

0 206.0 201. 0 204.

2 204.

6 203.

7 Averag e Chlorin e Feedrat e (lb/hr) 204. 7 204. 2 Th e weigh

tof th e Containerize

d Soli d Wast

e use d t o calculat

e th e feedrate

s of chlorin e an d metal s ha s bee n reduce d b y th e weigh to f th e box , an d th e spiking material

s lea d nitrate , hexachloroethane

, an d th e solution o f

mercuri c nitrate

.

4-4 3Tabl e 4-34 . Uni t 4 - Chlorin e Feedrat e HCI/C1 ? Stac

k Samplin g Metal s Stac k Samplin g Run l 10-23-13 12:3 6 -13:3 6 Ru n 2

10-24-13 12:35-13:3 5 Ru n 3

10-25-1 3 13:3 5 -14:3 5 Run l

10-23-1 3 12:3 6 -15:20 Ru n 2

10-24-13 12:3 5 -15:1 5 Ru n 3

10-25-1 3 13:3 5 -16:1 1 Low-Bt u Liqui d Wast

e to Kil n Feedrat e (Ibs/hr ) 1,943.

7 , _1,996.

5 1,999.

6 1,978.

5 1,986.

6 1,999.

0 Low-Bt u Liqui d Wast

e to Kil n Chlorine Concentratio n (rag/kg

) 41 6 46 7 48

6 413 . 39 3 53

2 Chlorin e Feedrat

e (lb/hr ) 0.81 0.9 3 0.9

7 0.8

2 0.7

8 1.0

6 High-Bt u Liqui d Wast

e t o Kil n Feedrat e (lbs/hr ) 1,167.

0 1,205.

4 1,201.

0 1,189.

2 1,201.

2 1,201.

8 High-Bt u Liqui d Wast

e t o Kil n Chlorin

e Concentratio

n (mg/kg

) 1,45

0 1,39

0 1,36

0 1,49

0 1,36

0 1,35

0 High-Bt Chlorin e Feedrat

e (lb/hr ) 1.6

9 1.6

8 1.6

3 1.7

7 1.6

3 1.6

2 Liqui d Wast

e t o SC C Feedrat e (lbs/hr ) 1165.

6 1203. 1 1196. 3 1186.

2 1201.

5 1196.

2 Liqui d Wast

e t o SC C Chlorine Concentratio n (mg/kg

) 1,23

0 1,26

0 1,28

0 1,25

0 2,50

0 1,25

0 Chlorin e Feedrat

e (lb/hr ) 1.4

3 1.5

2 1.5

3 1.4

8 3.0

0 1.5

0 Containerize

d Soli d Waste 1 Feedrat e (lbs/hr ) 515.

3 51Z 3 498. 3 514.

2 505.

4 507.

6 Containerize

d Soli d Waste 1 Chlorin

e Concentratio

n (mg/kg

) 19

2 20

5 20

7 19

0 20

1 18

0 Containerize

d Soli d Waste 1 Chlorin

e Feedrat e (lb/hr ) 0.10 0.1 1 0.1 0 0.10 0.10 0.0 9 Bul k Soli d Wast

e Feedrat e (lbs/hr ) 6,093.

0 5,448.

0 5,739.

0 5,251.

5 5,598.

4 5,345.

0 Bul k Soli d Wast

e Chlorin

e Concentratio

n (mg/kg

) 18

4 25

7 19

1 21 9 24 3 17

3 Chlorin e Feedrat

e (Ib/hr ) 1.1

2 1.4

0 1.1

0 1.1

5 1.3

6 0.9

2 Chlorin e Spiking Chlorin e Feedrat

e (Ib/hr ) 197.

9 197.

9 197.

9 200.

0 197.

2 200.

3 Tota l Chlorin e Feedrat e (lb/hr ) 203.

0 203.

5 203.

2 205.

3 204. 1 205. 5 Averag e Chlorin e Feedrat e (Ib/hr ) 203. 2 205.0

' Th e weigh

to f th e Containerize

d Soli d Wast

e use d t o calculat

e th e feedrate

s o f chlorin e an d metal s ha s bee n reduce d b y th e weigh to f th e box , an

d th e spikin g material

s lea d nitrate , hexachloroethane, an

d th e solutio n o f mercuric nitrat

e

4-44Tabl e 4-35 . Uni t 2 - As h Feedrat e Durin g th e EP A Metho d 5 Stac k Samplin g fo r P M Run l 10-8-1 3 11:5 0 -13:0 0 Ru n 2 10-9-1 3 09:4 5 -10:5 3 Ru n 3

10-10-1 3 09:45 -10:5 3

Low-Bt u Liqui d Waste Feedrat e (lbs/hr) 1,277. 2 1,353. 3 1,288.3 Low-Bt u Liqui d Waste As h Concentratio n (mg/kg ) 3,14 0 2,96 0 3,25 0 Low-Bt u Liqui d Waste As h Feedrate (lb/hr) 4.0 1 4.0 1 4.1 9 High-Bt u Liqui d Waste Feedrat e (lbs/hr) 1,000. 2 997. 7 998. 5 High-Bt u Liqui d Waste As h Concentratio n (mg/kg ) 1,350 1,01 0 1,18 0 High-Bt u Liqui d Waste As h Feedrat e (lb/hr) 1.3

5 1.0 1 1.1 8 Specialt y Liqui d Wast e Feedrat e (lbs/hr) 270. 8 256. 5 296. 7 Specialt y Liqui d Wast e As h Concentratio n (mg/kg ) 64 9 59 9 59 8 Specialt y Liqui d Wast e As h Feedrat e (lb/hr) 0.1 8 0.1 5 0.1 8

Containerize d Soh d Waste Feedrat e (lbs/hr) 734. 9 738. 4 746. 0 Containerize d Soh d Waste As h Concentratio n (mg/kg ) 675,00 0 688,00 0 655,00 0 Containerize d Soh d Waste As h Feedrat e (lb/hr) 496. 1 508. 0 488. 6 Tota l As h Feedrat e (lb/hr ) 501. 6 513. 2 494. 2 Averag e As h Feedrat e (lb/hr ) 503. 0

4-4 5

VES01742 7Tabl e 4-36 . Uni t 3 - As h Feedrat e Durin g th e EP A Metho d 5 Stac k Samplin g fo r P M Run l 10-15-1 3 13:1 6 -14:2 5 Ru n 2

10-16-1 3 11:1 5 -12:2 5 Ru n 3

10-17-1 3 09:5 0 -10:5 7
Low-Bt u Liqui d Waste Feedrat e (lbs/hr ) , 1,292. 9 955. 4 1,357. 6 Low-Bt u Liqui d Waste As h Concentratio n (mg/kg ) 3,09 0 4,07 0 3,65 0 As h Feedrat

e (lb/hr ) 4.0 0 3.8 9 4.9 6 High-Bt u Liqui d Waste Feedrat e (lbs/hr ) 847. 9 818. 2 875. 3 High-Bt u Liqui d Waste As h Concentratio n (mg/kg ) 1,260 93 7 59 9 High-Bt As h Feedrat e (lb/hr ) 1.0 7 0.77 0.52 Specialty Liqui d Wast e Feedrat e (lbs/hr ) 307. 9 269. 1 457. 4 Specialty Liqui d Wast e As h Concentratio n (mg/kg ) 59 1 622 58 8 Specialt As h Feedrate (lb/hr ) 0.1 8 0.1 7 0.2 7
Containerize d Soli d Waste Feedrat e (lbs/hr ) 738. 3 742. 1 720. 7 Containerize d Soli d Waste As h Concentratio n (mg/kg ) 670,00 0 682,00 0 778,00 0 Containerize As h Feedrat e (lb/hr ) 494. 7 506. 1 560. 7 Tota l As h Feedrat e (lb/hr ) 499. 9 510. 9 566. 5 Averag e As h Feedrat e (lb/hr ) 525. 8

4-4 6

VES01742 8Tabl e 4-37 . Uni t 4 - As h Feedrat e Durin g th e EP A Metho d 5 Stac k Samplin g fo r P M Run l 10-23-1 3 09:3 0 -10:4 2 Ru n 3

10-25-1 3 09:3 5 -10:4 0 Ru n 4

10-25-1 3 10:5 0 -11:5 5
Low-Bt u Liqui d Wast e Feedrat e (lbs/hr) 1,899. 6 1,901. 0 1,896. 8 Low-Bt u Liqui d Wast e As h Concentratio n (mg/kg) 2,79 0 3,32 0 3,25 0

As h Feedrat

e (lb/hr ) 5.3 0 6.3 1 6.1 6 High-Bt u Liqui d Wast e Feedrat e (lbs/hr) 1,101. 4 1,098. 1 1,108. 9 High-Bt u Liqui d Wast e As h Concentratio n (mg/kg ) 1,61 0 1,500 98 9 High-Bt As h Feedrat e (lb/hr) 1.7

7 1.6

5 1.1 0 Liqui d Wast e to SC C Feedrat e (lbs/hr) 1,095. 6 1,100. 7 1,102. 8 Liqui d Wast e to SC C As h Concentratio n (mg/kg ) 74 4 78 7 74 3 As h Feedrat

e (lb/hr) 0.8 2 0.87 0.82
Containerize d Soli d Wast e Feedrat e (lbs/hr) 565. 8 568. 6 553. 8 Containerize d Soli d Wast e As h Concentratio n (mg/kg ) 758,00 0 724,00 0 771,00 0 Containerize d Soli d Wast e As h Feedrat e (lb/hr ) 428. 9 411. 7 427. 0
Bul k Soli d Wast

e Feedrat e (Ibs/hr ) 6,286. 7 6,408. 0 5,992. 6 Bul k Soli d Wast

e As h Concentratio n (mg/kg ) 695,00 0 689,00 0 710,00 0

As h Feedrat

e (lb/hr ) 4,369. 2 4,415. 1 4,254. 8 Tota l As h Feedrat e (lb/hr ) 4,806. 0 4,835. 6 4,689. 9 Averag e As h Feedrat e (lb/hr ) 4,777. 2

4-47

VES01742 94.3. 3 Metal s Feedrate s Feedrate s ofth e metal s regulatedb y the HW C MAC T (As , Be , Cd , Cr , Pb , andHg ) ar e OPL s fo r th e emissio n standards fo r

SVM , LVM , an

dmercury . Th e feedrate s o f thes e si x metal s hav e bee n determine ddurin g th

e metal s stac

k samplin g i n th

e secon dpar

t o f eac h run . The stac

k gas concentration s o f

al l si x o f th e HW C MAC T metal s ar e determine db y EP A Metho d29 . Tabl e 4-3 8 presents the feedrate s o f thes e metal s calculate ddurin g stac k samplin g fo r

metal s fo r Uni t 2 . Metal s feedrate s fo r

Uni t 3 ar e presented i n Tabl e 4-40 , an dmetal s feedrate s fo r Uni t 4 ar e presented i n Tabl e 4-42 . Th e OPL s fo r

metal s feedrate s ar

e tota l LV M feedrat

e (i.e. , tota

l an dpumpable ) an

d pumpabl e LV M fo r

the emissio n standar

d fo r LV M (i.e. , arsenic , beryllium , an dchromium) ; (Total ) SV M feedrat

e (i.e. , tota

l an dpumpable ) fo r

the emissio n standar

d fo r SV M (i.e. , cadmiu man

dlead) ; and(Total ) mercur y feedrat e (i.e. , tota

l an dpumpable ) fo r

th e emissio n standar d fo r mercury . Tabl e 4-3 9 present s th e feedrate s o f

tota l LV M an

dpumpable LVM , total SVM , an dmercur y calculate dduring stac

k samphng fo r

metal s fo r

Um t 2 . Tota l LV M an

d pumpabl e LVM , total SVM , an dmercur y feedrate s fo r

Uni t 3 ar e presented i n Tabl e 4-41 , an d tota l LV M an

dpumpabl e LVM , tota

l SVM , an dmercur

y feedrate s fo r

Uni t 4 ar e presente

d i n tabl e 4-43 . Fo r th e calculatio n o f

th e metal s feedrates , th e weigh t o f th e containerize dsoli dwast e use dto calculat

e the feedrate s o f

metal s was reduce db y the weight o f th e box , an dth e spikin g material s lea dnitrate , hexachloroethane , an dth e solutio n o f

mercuri c nitrat

e t o determin

e th e feedrat e o f containerize dsoli dwast

e tha t wa s analyze dfo r

th e metal s As , Be , Cd , Cr , Pb , an d Hg .

4-4 8

VES01743 0Tabl e 4-38 . Uni t 2 - Metal s Feedrate s Run l Ru n 3 Ru n 5 10-8-13 10-10-1 3 10-30-1 3 15:40-18:43 12:30-15:1 0 12:4 5 -15:3 2 Feedrat e (lbs/hr ) 1,47

5 1,51

3 1,39

6 Arseni c Con e (mg/kg ) 2.

7 3.

2 2. 1 Beryllium Con

e (mg/kg ) <0.09

7 <0.09

6 <0.09

7 Cadmiu m Con e (mg/kg ) 7.

2 9 7 Chromiu m Con e (mg/kg ) 0.

8 0.8

8 0.7

4 Low-Bt u Liqui d Wast

e Lea

d Con e (mg/kg ) 1.

1 1.

7 1.

1 Low-Bt u Liqui d Wast

e Mercur

y Con e (mg/k g 0.021 0.04 2 0.05

2 Liqui d Wast

e Arseni

c Feedrat

e (lbs/hr ) 0.0039

8 0.0048

4 0.0029

3 Low-Bt u Liqui d Wast

e Berylliu

m Feedrat

e (lbs/hr ) <0.00014 <0.00015 <0.0001 4 Low-Bt u Liqui d Wast

e Cadmiu

m Feedrat

e (lbs/hr ) 0.010

6 0.013

6 0.0097

8 Low-Bt u Liqui d Wast

e

Chromiu

m Feedrat

e (lbs/hr ) 0.0011 8 0.0013 3 0.0010

3 Low-Bt u Liqui d Wast

e

Lea

d Feedrat

e (lbs/hr ) 0.0016

2 0.0025

7 0.0015

4 Low-Bt u Liqui d Wast

e

Mercur

y Feedrat

e (lbs/hr ) 0.000031 0 0.000063 6 0.000072

6

High-Bt u Liqui d Wast

e Feedrat e (lbs/hr ) 1,28

9 1,09

9 1,16

5

High-Bt u Liqui d Wast

e Arseni

c Con e (mg/kg ) 8.

3 2.

8 <0.3

2

High-Bt u Liqui d Wast

e Berylliu

m Con e (mg/kg ) <0.09

6 <0.09

9 <0.09

6
High-Bt u Liqui d Wast

e Cadmiu

m Con e (mg/kg ) <0.07

6 <0.07

8 <0.07

6 High-Bt u Liqui d Wast

e Chromiu

m Con e (mg/kg ) 0.2

6 <0.2

2 <0.2

1 High-Bt u Liqui d Wast

e Lea

d Con e (mg/kg ) 1 0.6 7 6.

7 High-Bt u Liqui d Wast

e Mercur

y Con e (mg/k g 0.02

6 0.021 0.09 6 High-Bt Liqui d Wast

e Arseni

c Feedrat

e (lbs/hr ) 0.010

7 0.0030

8 <0.0003

7 High-Bt u Liqui d Wast

e Berylliu

m Feedrat

e (lbs/hr ) <0.0001

2 <0.0001 1 <0.0001 1 High-Bt u Liqui d Wast

e Cadmiu

m Feedrat

e (lbs/hr ) <0.00009

8 <0.00008

6 <0.00008

9 High-Bt u Liqui d Wast

e

Chromiu

m Feedrat

e (lbs/hr ) 0.00033

5 <0.0002

4 <0.0002

4 High-Bt u Liqui d Wast

e

Lea

d Feedrat

e (lbs/hr ) 0.0012

9 0.00073

6 0.0078

0 High-Bt u Liqui d Wast

e

Mercur

y Feedrat

e (lbs/hr ) 0.000033

5 0.000023 1 0.00011 2

Specialt y Liqui d Wast

e Feedrat e (lbs/hr ) 43

3 42

5 44

5

Specialt y Liqui d Wast

e Arseni

c Con e (mg/kg ) <0.3

2 <0.

3 <0.3

1

Specialt y Liqui d Wast

e Berylliu

m Con e (mg/kg ) <0.09

6 <0.09

2 <0.09

3
Specialt y Liqui d Wast

e Cadmiu

m Con e (mg/kg ) <0.07

6 <0.07

3 <0.07

3 Specialt y Liqui d Wast

e Chromiu

m Con e (mg/kg ) <0.21 <0. 2 <0.

2 Specialt y Liqui d Wast

e Lea

d Con e (mg/kg ) <0.2

7 <0.2

6 <0.2

6 Specialt y Liqui d Wast

e Mercur

y Con e (mg/k g <0.00

9 <0.008

6 <0.009

9 Specialt Arsenic Feedrat e (lbs/hr ) <0.00014 <0.0001 3 <0.000l

4 Specialt y Liqui d Wast

e Berylliu

m Feedrat

e (Ibs/hr ) <0.00004

2 <0.00003

9 <0.000041 Specialt y Liqui d Wast

e Cadmiu

m Feedrat

e (lbs/hr ) <0.00003

3 <0.00003 1 <0.00003 3 Specialt y Liqui d Wast

e

Chromiu

m Feedrat

e (lbs/hr ) <0.00009 1 <0.00008 5 <0.00008

9 Specialt y Liqui d Wast

e

Lea

d Feedrat

e (lbs/hr ) <0.0001

2 <0.0001 1 <0.0001 2 Specialt y Liqui d Wast

e

Mercur

y Feedrat

e (lbs/hr ) <0.000003

9 <0.000003

7 <0.000004

4

Containerize

d Soli d Waste1 Feedrat e (lbs/hr ) 54

7 53

6 54

2

Containerize

d Soli d Waste1 Arseni c Con e (mg/kg ) 8.

8 7.

5 8.

8

Containerize

d Soli d Waste1 Berylliu m Con e (mg/kg ) 0.4

8 0.61 0.7 3

Containerize

d Soli d Waste1 Cadmiu m Con e (mg/kg ) 0.08

2 <0.07

7 0.08

4
Containerize

d Soli d Waste1 Chromiu m Con e (mg/kg ) 12.

8 19.

3 16.

7 Containerize

d Soli d Waste1 Lea d Con e (trig/kg ) 11.

6 11.

7 13.

5 Containerize

d Soli d Waste1 Mercur y Con e (mg/k g 0.04

5 0.02

2 0.016 Containerize

d Soli d Waste1 Arseni c Feedrat

e (lbs/hr ) 0.0048 1 0.0040 2 0.0047

7 Containerize

d Soli d Waste1 Berylliu m Feedrat

e (lbs/hr ) 0.00026

3 0.00032

7 0.00039

6 Containerize

d Soli d Waste1
Cadmiu m Feedrat

e (lbs/hr ) 0.000044

9 <0.00004 1 0.000045 6 Containerize

d Soli d Waste1

Chromiu m Feedrat

e (lbs/hr ) 0.0070

0 0.010

3 0.0090

6 Containerize

d Soli d Waste1

Lea d Feedrat

e (lbs/hr ) 0.0063

5 0.0062

7 0.0073

2 Containerize

d Soli d Waste1

Mercur y Feedrat

e (lbs/hr ) 0.000024

6 0.000011 8 0.0000086 8
4-4 9Tabl e 4-38 . (continued ) Uni t 2 - Metal s Feedrate s Run l 10-8-1 3 15:4 0 -18:43 Ru n 3

10-10-13 12:3 0 -15:1 0 Ru n 5

10-30-13 12:4 5 -15:32
Spiking Arsenic Feedrat e (lbs/hr ) 0 0 0 Spiking Beryllium Feedrat e (lbs/tir ) 0 0 0 Spiking Cadmiu m Feedrat

e (lbs/hr ) 0 0 0 Spiking Chromiu m Feedrat

e (lbs/hr ) 45.8 47. 3 45.8 Spiking Lea d Feedrat

e (lbs/hr ) 61.9 61. 7 62.0 Spiking Mercur y Feedrat

e (lbs/hr ) 0.0019

6 0.0019

6 0.0020

4
Pumpabl e Feedrate 2 Arsenic Feedrat e (lbs/hr ) 0.014

7 0.0079

2 0.0029

3 Pumpabl e Feedrate 2 Beryllium Feedrat e (lbs/hr ) 0 0 0 Pumpabl e Feedrate 2 Cadmiu

m Feedrat

e (lbs/hr ) 0.010

6 0.013

6 0.0097

8 Pumpabl e Feedrate 2 Chromiu

m Feedrat

e (lbs/hr ) 45.8 47. 3 45. 9 Pumpabl e Feedrate 2 Lea

d Feedrat

e (lbs/hr ) 0.0029 1 0.0033 1 0.0093 4 Pumpabl e Feedrate 2 Mercuiy Feedrat e (lbs/hr ) 0.000064

5 0.000086

6 0.00018

4

Total Feedrate 2 Arsenic Feedrat e (lbs/hr ) 0.019

5 0.011 9 0.0077 1 Total Feedrate 2 Beryllium Feedrat e (lbs/hr ) 0.00026

3 0.00032

7 0.00039

6 Total Feedrate 2 Cadmiu

m Feedrat

e (lbs/hr ) 0.010

7 0.013

6 0.0098

2 Total Feedrate 2 Chromiu

m Feedrat

e (lbs/hr ) 45.8 47. 3 45.9 Total Feedrate 2 Lea

d Feedrat

e (Ibs/hr ) 61.9 61. 7 62. 0 Total Feedrate 2 Mercur

y Feedrat

e (lbs/hr ) 0.0020

5 0.0020

6 0.0022

4

1 The weigh

to f th e Containerize

d Soli d Wast

e use d t o calculat

e di e feedrate

s of chlorin e an d metal s ha s bee n reduce d by th e weigh tofth e box

, an d th e spikin g material

s lea d nitrate , hexachloroethane

, an d th e solutio n of mercuri c nitrate .
2Non-detect

s treate d a s a zer o "0" .

4-5 0Tabl e 4-39 . Uni t 2 - HW C MAC T Metal s Feedrate s
Unit s Run l 10-8-13 13:4 0 -18:4 3 Ru n 3

10-10-13 12:3 0 -15:1 0 Ru n 5

10-30-13 12:4 5 -15:32 Averag

e Arseni c (Total ) lb/hr 0.019 5 0.011 9 0.007 7 0.013

0 Berylliu m (Total ) lb/h r 0.0002 6 0.0003

3 0.0004

0 0.0003

3 Chromiu m (Total ) lb/h r 45.8 47. 3 45.9 46. 3 Total LV M (Arsenic , Beryllium ,

Chromium ) lb/hr 45. 9 47. 3 45.9 46. 3 Arsenic (Pumpable

) Ib/h r 0.014

7 0.007

9 0.002

9 0.008

5 Berylliu m (Pumpable

) lb/h r 0.000 0 0.000

0 0.000

0 0.000

0 Chromiu m (Pumpable

) lb/h r 45.8 47. 3 45.9 46. 3 Pumpabl e LV M (Arsenic , Beryllium , Chromium ) lb/h r 45.9 47. 3 45.9 46. 3 Cadmiu m Ib/h r 0.010

7 0.013

6 0.009

8 0.011

4 Lead lb/h' r 61.9 61. 7 62.

0 61.

9 Total SV M (Cadmium , Lead ) lb/hr 61.9 61. 7 62.

0 61.9 Mercur y lb/h r 0.0020 5 0.0020

6 0.0022

4 0.0021

2

4-5 1

VES01743 3Tabl e 4-40 . Uni t 3 - Metal s Feedrate s Ru n 2 Ru n 3 Ru n 4 10-16-1 3 10-17-13 10-18-1 3 14:0 0 • 16:5 0 12:3

0 -15:2 5 09:3

5 -12:2 0 Feedrat e (lbs/hr ) 1,78

8 ' 1,68

5 1,70

7 Arsenic Con

e (mg/kg ) 4.

8 3.

2 3.

3 Beryllium Con

e (mg/kg ) <0.09

6 <0.09

7 <0.09

6 Cadmiu m Con e (mg/kg ) 15.

2 9.

4 11.

3 Chromiu m Con e (mg/kg ) 1.

3 0.8

7 0.9

7 Lea d Con

e (mg/kg ) 3. 1 1. 9 1.

9 Low-Bt u Liqui d Wast

e Mercur

y Con e (mg/k g 0.06

5 0.04

9 0.0

8 Arsenic Feedrat

e (lbs/hr ) 0.0085

8 0.0053

9 0.0056

3 Beryllium Feedrat

e (lbs/hr ) <0.0001

7 <0.0001 6 <0.0001 6 Cadmiu m Feedrat

e (lbs/hr ) 0.027

2 0.015

8 0.019

3 Chromiu m Feedrat

e (lbs/hr ) 0.0023

2 0.0014

7 0.0016

6 Lea d Feedrat

e (lbs/hr ) 0.0055

4 0.0032

0 0.0032

4 Mercur y Feedrat

e (lbs/hr ) 0.00011 6 0.000082 6 0.00013

7 Feedrat e (lbs/hr ) 1,04

4 1,16

7 1,19

8 Arsenic Con

e (mg/kg ) 12.

4 1.

7 2.

4 Beryllium Con

e (mg/kg ) <0.09

5 <0. 1 <0.09 6 Cadmiu m Con e (mg/kg ) <0.07

5 <0.07

9 <0.07

6 Chromiu m Con e (mg/kg ) <02 1 <0.2 2 <0.2

1 Lea d Con e (mg/kg ) 1.

8 1 1. 3 High-Bt u Liqui d Wast

e Mercur

y Con e (mg/k g 0.02

7 0.02

9 0.02

2 High-Bt Arsenic Feedrat e (lbs/hr ) 0.012

9 0,0019

8 0.0028

7 Beryllium Feedrat

e (lbs/hr ) <0.00009

9 <0.0001

2 <0.0001 1 Cadmiu m Feedrat

e (lbs/hr ) <0.00007

8 <0.00009

2 <0.000091 Chromiu m Feedrat

e (lbs/hr ) <0.0002

2 <0.0002

6 <O.00O2

5 Lead Feedrat

e (lbs/hr ) 0.0018

8 0.0011

7 0.0015

6 Mercur y Feedrat

e (lbs/hr ) 0.000028

2 0.000033

8 0.000O26

3 Feedrat e (lbs/hr ) 20

3 35

0 24

5 Arsenic Con

e (mg/kg ) <0.3

2 <0.3

2 <0.3

3 Berylliu m Con e (mg/kg ) <0.09

8 <0.09

6 <0.09

9 Cadmiu m Con e (mg/kg ) <0.07

7 <0.07

6 <0.07

8 Chromiu m Con e (mg/kg ) <0.2

2 <0.2

1 <0.2

2 Lea d Con

e (mg/kg ) <0.2

7 <0.2

7 <0.2

8 Specialt y Liqui d Wast

e Mercur

y Con e (mg/k g <0.008

8 <0.009

4 <0.009

9 Specialt Arseni c Feedrat

e (lbs/hr ) <O.O00O6

5 <0.0001 1 <0.000081 Beryllium Feedrat

e (lbs/hr ) <0.00002

0 <0.00003

4 <0.00002

4 Cadmiu m Feedrat

e (lbs/hr ) <0.000016 <O.O00O2 7 <0.00001

9 Chromiu m Feedrat

e (lbs/hr ) <0.00004

5 <O.O0007

3 <0.00005

4 Lea d Feedrat

e (lbs/hr ) <0.00005

5 <0.00009

4 <0.00006

9 Mercur y Feedrat

e (lbs/hr ) <0.0000018 <0.000003 3 <0.000002

4 Feedrat e (lbs/hr ) 54

2 53

7 52

4 Arseni c Con

e (mg/kg ) 7.

5 6.

4 8.

4 Berylliu m Con e (mg/kg ) 0.5

8 0.5

5 0.7

9 Cadmiu m Con e (mg/kg ) <0.07

1 <0.07

6 <0.07

1 Chromiu m Con e (mg/kg ) 13.

6 13.

7 18.

9 Lea d Con e (mg/kg ) 11. 1 10. 7 14.1 Containerize

d Soli d Waste 1 Mercur

y Con e (mg/k g 0.02

8 0.02

8 0.02

6 Arsenic Feedrat

e (lbs/hr ) 0.0040

6 0.0034

3 0.0044

0 Beryllium Feedrat

e (lbs/hr ) 0.000314 0.00029 5 0.00041

4 Cadmiu m Feedrat

e (lbs/hr ) <0.00003

8 <0.00004 1 <0.00003 7 Chromiu m Feedrat

e (lbs/hr ) 0.0073

7 0.0073

5 0.0099

0 Lea d Feedrat

e (lbs/hr ) 0.00601 0.0057 4 0.00739

3 Mercur y Feedrat

e (lbs/hr ) 0.000015

2 0.000015

0 0.000013

6
4-5 2Tabl e 4-40 . (continued ) Uni t 3 - Metal s Feedrate s Ru n 2 Ro n 3 Ru n 4 10-16-1 3 10-17-13 10-18-13 14:00-16:5 0 12:3

0 -15:2 5 09:3

5 -12:20
Spiking Arsenic Feedrat e (lbs/hr ) 0 0 0 Spiking Berylliu m Feedrat

e (lbs/hr ) 0 0 0 Spiking Cadmiu m Feedrat

e (lbs/hr ) 0 0 0 Spiking Chromiu m Feedrat

e (lbs/hr ) 46.

3 46. 1 45. 7 Spiking Lea d Feedrat

e (lbs/hr ) 62. 1 62. 5 62.

2 Spiking Mercur y Feedrat

e {lbs/hr ) 0.0020

4 0.0020

0 0.0020

9
Pumpabl e Feedrate 2 Arsenic Feedrat e (lbs/hr ) 0.021

5 0.0073

8 0.0085 1 Pumpabl e Feedrate 2 Berylliu

m Feedrat

e (lbs/hr ) 0 0 0 Pumpabl e Feedrate 2 Cadmiu

m Feedrat

e (lbs/hr ) 0.027

2 0.015

8 0.019

3 Pumpabl e Feedrate 2 Chromiu

m Feedrat

e (lbs/hr ) 46.

3 46. 1 45. 7 Pumpabl e Feedrate 2 Lea

d Feedrat

e (lbs/hr ) 0.0074

2 0.0043

7 0.0048

0 Pumpabl e Feedrate 2 Mercur

y Feedrat

e (lbs/hr ) 0.00014

4 0.00011 6 0.00016 3

Tota l Feedrate 2 Arsenic Feedrat e (lbs/hr ) 0.025

6 0.010

8 0.012

9 Tota l Feedrate 2 Berylliu

m Feedrat

e (lbs/hr ) 0.000314 0.00029 5 0.000414 Tota l Feedrate 2 Cadmiu

m Feedrat

e (lbs/hr ) 0.027

2 0.015

8 0.019

3 Tota l Feedrate 2 Chromiu

m Feedrat

e (lbs/hr ) 46.

3 46. 1 45. 7 Tota l Feedrate 2 Lea

d Feedrat

e (lbs/hr ) 62. 1 62. 5 62.

2 Mercur y Feedrat

e (lbs/hr ) 0.0022

0 0.0021

3 0.0022

6

1 Th e weigh tof fh e Containerize

d Soli d Wast

e use d t o calculat

e th e feedrate

s of chlorin e an d metal s ha s bee n reduce d b y th e weigh tof fh e box, an d fh e spikin g material

s lea d nitrate , hexachloroethane

, an d fh e solutio n of mercuri c nitrate .
2Non-detect

s treate d a s a zer o "0" .
Tabl e 4-41 . Uni t 3 - HW C MAC T Metal s Feedrate s Units Ru n 2

10-16-13 14:0 0 -16:5 0 Ru n 3

10-17-13 12:3 0 -15:25 Ru n 4

10-18-13 09:3 5 -12:2 0 Average Arseni c (Total

) lb/h r 0.025 6 0.010

8 0.012

9 0.016

4 Beryllium (Total

) lb/h r 0.0003 1 0.0003 0 0.0004 1 0.0003 4 Chromiu m (Total ) lb/h r 46. 3 46. 1 45. 7 46.

0 Total LV M (Arsenic , Beryllium , Chromium ) lb/h r 46. 3 46. 1 45. 8 46. 1 Arseni c (Pumpable

) lb/h r 0.0215 2 0.0073

8 0.0085 1 0.0124 7 Berylliu m (Pumpable

) lb/h r 0.0000 0 0.0000

0 0.0000

0 0.00000

0 Chromiu m (Pumpable

) lb/h r 46. 3 46. 1 45. 7 46.0 Pompabl e LV M (Arsenic , Beryllium , Chromium ) lb/hr 46. 3 46. 1 45. 7 46.0 Cadmium lb/h r 0.0271 7 0.0158

4 0.0192

9 0.0207

7 Lea d lb/h r 62. 1 62. 5 62.2 62. 3 Tota l SV M (Cadmium , Lead ) lb/h r 62. 1 62. 5 62.2 62. 3 Mercur y lb/h r 0.0022 0 0.00213 0.0022 6 0.0022

0

4-5 3

VES01743 5Tabl e 4-42 . Uni t 4 - Metal s Feedrate s Run l Ru n 2 Ru n 3 10-23-13 10-24-1 3 10-25-13 12:3 6 -15:2 0 12:35-15:1 5 13:35-16:1 1 Feedrat e (lbs/hr ) 1,97

9 1,98

7 1,99

9 Arseni c Con

e (mg/kg ) 5.

5 4.

9 2. 9 Beryllium Cone (mg/kg ) <0.09

4 <0.09

8 <0.09

6 Cadmiu m Con e (mg/kg ) 13.

6 12. 1 9. 4 Chromiu m Con e (mg/kg ) 1.

3 1.

2 0.8

4 Lea d Con e (mg/kg ) 3.

3 . 2.9 1. 6 Low-Bt u Liqui d Wast

e t o Kil n Mercur y Con e (mg/k g 0.1 1 0.1 4 0.1 1 Arseni c Feedrat

e (lbs/hr ) 0.010

9 0.0097

3 0.0058

0 Beryllium Feedrat

e (lbs/hr ) <0.00019 •C0.0001 9 <0.O001

9 Cadmiu m Feedrat

e (lbs/hr ) 0.026

9 0.024

0 0.018

8 Chromiu m Feedrat

e (lbs/hr ) 0.0025

7 0.0023

8 0.0016

8 Lea d Feedrat

e (lbs/hr ) 0.0065

3 0.0057

6 0.0032

0 Mercur y Feedrat

e (lbs/hr ) 0.00021 8 0.00027 8 0.00022

0 Feedrat e (lbs/hr ) 1,18

9 1,20

1 1,20

2 Arseni c Con

e (mg/kg ) 1.

4 0.3

7 <0.3

2 Beryllium Con

e (mg/kg ) <0.09

9 <0.09

3 <0.09

7 Cadmiu m Cone (mg/kg

) 0.12 <0.07 3 <0.07

7 Chromiu m Con e (mg/kg ) 0.2

4 <0.

2 <0.21 Lea d Cone (mg/kg

) 1.

1 . 0.

4 <0.2

7 High-Bt u Liqui d Wast

e t o Kil n Mercur y Con e (mg/k g 0.04

8 0.021 0.01 8 High-Bt Arsenic Feedrat e (lbs/hr ) 0.0016

6 0.00044

4 <O.OO03

8 Beryllium Feedrat

e (lbs/hr ) <0.0001

2 <0.0001 1 <0.0001 2 Cadmiu m Feedrat

e (lbs/hr ) 0.00014

3 <O.O0O08

8 <0.00009

3 Chromiu m Feedrat

e (lbs/hr ) 0.00028

5 <0.0002

4 <0.0002

5 Lea d Feedrat

e (lbs/hr ) 0.0013 1 0.00048 0 <0.0003

2 Mercur y Feedrat

e (lbs/hr ) 0.000057 1 0.000025 2 0.000021 6 Feedrat e (lbs/hr ) 1,18

6 1,20

2 1,19

6 Arseni c Cone (mg/kg

) <0.

3 <0.3

2 <0.3 1 Beryllium Con

e (mg/kg ) <0.09

2 <0.09

8 <0.09

4 Cadmiu m Con e (mg/kg ) <0.07

3 <0.07

7 <0.07

4 Chromiu m Con e (mg/kg ) <0.

2 <0.2

2 <0.21 Lead Con

e (mg/kg ) 0.2

6 <0.2

7 <0.2

6 Liqui d Wast

e t o SC C Mercur y Con e (mg/k g 0.01

7 0.01 9 0.017 Arsenic Feedrat

e (lbs/hr ) <0.0003

6 <0.0003

8 <0.0003

7 Beryllium Feedrat

e (lbs/hr ) <0.0001 1 <0.0001 2 <0.0001 1 Cadmiu m Feedrat

e (lbs/hr ) <0.00008

7 <0.00009

3 <O.O0O08

9 Chromiu m Feedrat

e (Ibs/hr ) <0.0002

4 <0.0002

6 <0.0002

5 Lead Feedrat

e (lbs/hr ) 0.O0030

8 <0.0003

2 <0.0003 1 Mercur y Feedrat

e (lbs/hr ) 0.000020

2 0.000022

8 0.000020

3 Feedrat e (lbs/hr ) 514 50 5 50

8 Arseni c Cone (mg/kg

) 2.

4 2 2. 1 Berylliu m Con e (mg/kg ) 0.1

3 0.1 6 <0. 1 Cadmiu m Con e (mg/kg ) 0.4

6 0.4

3 0.4

5 Chromiu m Con e (mg/kg ) 45.

2 58.

9 35. 1 Lea d Con e (mg/kg ) 35.9 212 25. 4 Containerize

d Soli d Waste1 Mercur y Con e (mg/k g 0.18 0.2 4 0.2

6 Arsenic Feedrat

e (lbs/hr ) 0.0012

3 0.00101 0.0010 7 Berylliu m Feedrat

e (lbs/hr ) 0.000066

8 0.000080

9 <0.00005 1 Cadmiu m Feedrat

e (lbs/hr ) 0.00023

7 0.00021

7 0.00022

8 Chromiu m Feedrat

e (lbs/hr ) 0.023

2 0.029

8 0.017

8 Lea d Feedrat

e (lbs/hr ) 0.018

5 O.10

7 0.012

9 Mercur y Feedrat

e (lbs/hr ) 0.000092

6 0.000121 0.00013 2

4-5 4

VES01743 6Tabl e 4-42 . (continued ) Uni t 4 - Metal s Feedrate s Sun t 10-23-1 3 12:3 6 -15:2 0 Ru n 2

10-24-1 3 12:35-15:1 5 Ru n 3

10-25-13 13:3 5 -16:1 1

Bul k Solid Wast

e Feedrat e (lbs/hr ) 525 1 559 8 534

5

Bul k Solid Wast

e Arsenic Con e (mg/kg ) 2.

2 3 2. 2

Bul k Solid Wast

e Beryllium Con e (mg/kg ) 0.21 0.2 8 0.2

6

Bul k Solid Wast

e Cadmiu m Con e (mg/kg ) 0.2

8 0.3

7 0.

3
Bul k Solid Wast

e Chromiu m Con e (mg/kg ) 35.6 37. 9 29.8 Bul k Solid Wast

e Lea d Con e (mg/kg ) 41 58. 1 26.6 Bul k Solid Wast

e Mercur y Con e (mg/k g 0.08

2 0.1

2 0.07

7 Arseni c Feedrat

e (lbs/hr ) 0.011 6 0.016 8 0.011 8 Bul k Solid Wast

e Beryllium Feedrat e (lbs/hr ) 0.0011 0 0.0015 7 0.0013

9 Bul k Solid Wast

e Cadmiu m Feedrat

e (lbs/hr ) 0.0014

7 0.0020

7 0.0016

0 Bul k Solid Wast

e

Chromiu

m Feedrat

e (lbs/hr ) 0.18

7 0.21

2 0.15

9 Bul k Solid Wast

e

Lea d Feedrat

e (lbs/hr ) 0.21 5 0.32 5 0.14

2 Bul k Solid Wast

e

Mercur y Feedrat

e (lbs/hr ) 0.00043 1 0.00067 2 0.000412 Spikin g Arsenic Feedrat e (lbs/hr ) 0 0 0 Spikin g Beryllium Feedrat e (lbs/hr ) 0 0 0 Spikin g Cadmiu m Feedrat

e (lbs/hr ) 0 0 0 Spikin g Chromiu m Feedrat

e (lbs/hr ) 46. 0 46. 0 45.8 Spikin g Lead Feedrat e (lbs/hr ) 62.

0 61. 1 62.0 Spikin g Mercur y Feedrat

e (lbs/hr ) 0.039

3 0.038

8 0.0394 '
Pumpabl e Feedrate 2 Arsenic Feedrat e (lbs/hr ) 0.012

5 0.010

2 0.0058

0 Pumpabl e Feedrate 2 Beryllium Feedrat e (lbs/hr ) 0 0 0 Pumpabl e Feedrate 2 Cadmiu

m Feedrat

e (lbs/hr ) 0.0271 0.024 0 0.018

8 Pumpabl e Feedrate 2 Chromiu

m Feedrat

e (lbs/hr ) 46. 0 46. 0 45.8 Pumpabl e Feedrate 2 Lea

d Feedrat

e (lbs/hr ) 0.00815 0.0062 4 0.0032

0 Pumpabl e Feedrate 2 Mercur

y Feedrat

e (lbs/hr ) 0.00029

5 0.00032

6 0.00026

2

Tota l Feedrate 2 Arsenic Feedrat e (Ibs/hr ) 0.025

3 0.028

0 0.018

6 Tota l Feedrate 2 Beryllium Feedrat e (lbs/hr ) 0.00117 0.0016 5 0.0013

9 Tota l Feedrate 2 Cadmiu m Feedrat

e (lbs/hr ) 0.028

8 0.026

3 0.020

6 Tota l Feedrate 2 Chromiu m Feedrat

e (lbs/hr ) 46. 2 46. 3 46. 0 Tota l Feedrate 2 Lea d Feedrat

e (lbs/hr ) 62.

2 61.

5 62.

2 Tota l Feedrate 2 Mercur y Feedrat

e (lbs/hr ) 0.040

2 0.039

9 0.040

2

1 The weigh

tof th e Containerize

d Soli d Wast

e use d t o calculat

e th e feedrate

s of chlorin e an d metal s ha s bee n reduce d by th e weigh to f th e box, an d th e spikin g material

s lea d nitrate , hexachloroethane

, an d th e solutio n of mercuri c nitrate .
2Non-detect

s treate d a s a zer o "0" .

4-5 5

VES01743 7Tabl e 4-43 . Uni t 4 - HW C MAC T Metal s Feedrate s 1 Run l Ru n 3 Ru n 5 Unit s 10-8-13 15:4 0 -18:4 3 10-10-13 12:3 0 -15:1 0 10-30-1 3 12:45-15:3 2 Averag e Arseni c (Total

) Ib/h r 0.025

3 0.028

0 0.018

6 0.024

O Berylliu m (Total

) lb/h r 0.00117 0.0016 5 0.0013

9 0.0014

O Chromiu m (Total ) lb/hr 46. 2 46.

3 46.

0 46. 1 Tota l LV M (Arsenic , Beryllium , Chromium ) lb/h r 46.

2 ' 46.

3 46.

0 46. 2 Arseni c (Pumpable

) lb/h r 0.012

5 0.010

2 0.005

8 0.009

5 Berylliu m (Pumpable

) lb/h r 0,0000

0 0.0000

0 0.0000

0 0.00000

0 Chromiu m (Pumpable

) lb/hr 46. 0 46.

0 45.

8 45. 9 Pumpabl e LV M (Arsenic , Beryllium , Chromium ) lb/hr 46. 0 46.

0 45.

8 45. 9 Cadmiu m lb/h r 0.028

8 0.026

3 0.020

6 0.025

2 Lea d lb/hr 62. 2 61.

5 62.

2 62. 0 Tota l SV M (Cadmium , Lead ) lb/h r 62. 2 61.

6 62.

2 62. 0 Mercur y lb/hr 0.040 2 0.039

9 0.040

2 0.040 1

4-5 6

VES01743 85. 0 Qualit y Assurance/Qualit y Contro l A s par t o f th e comprehensiv e performanc e test , aproject-specifi c qualit y assurance/qualit

y contro l (QA/QC ) effort wa s develope dandimplemented . Thi s QA/Q C effort was documented i n th

e QAPjP , andwa

s tailore dt

o mee t th e specifi c needs o f

thi s tes t effort . Th e result s o f th e QA/Q C activitie s demonstrat e tha t th e qualit y o f projec t measuremen

t datai s wel l documente

d an dtha t th e dataar e reliable , defensible , and mee t projec t objectives . Th e primar

y objective s o f

th e QA/Q C effor t

wer e t o control , assess , an

ddocumen

t dat a quality . T o accomplis h thes e objectives , th e QA/Q C approac

h consiste do f

th e followin g ke y elements :

• Definitio n o f

qualit y assurance objective s tha t reflec t the overal l technica

l objective s o f th e measuremen

t program ;

• Desig n o f

asampling , analytical , QA/Q C anddat a.analysi s syste

mt o mee t thos e objectives ;

• Evaluatio n o f

th e performanc e o f

th e measuremen

t system ; an

d

• initiatio n of

correctiv e actio n whe

n measuremen

t systemperformanc e does not mee t th e specification s Th e CP T o f

th e incinerator s a

t Veoli aSauge

t was conductedi n accordanc e wit h the Q A procedure s describe di n th e Quality Assurance Project Plan for the Comprehensive Performance Test ofthe Units 2 and

3 Fixed Hearth Incinerators and the Unit 4 Rotary Kiln Incinerator, September

25, 2013. Thes e Q A procedure s includ e samplin g an danalytica l procedures , alon g wit h specifie dcalibratio n requirements , Q C checks , dat areductio n an

dvalidatio n procedures , andsampl e tracking . A revie w o f analytica l result s fo r

QA/Q C sample s an dassessmen t o f overal l dat

aqualit y i s presented i n thi s section . Detaile dQ C informatio n i s presente d i n th e appendice s t

o thi s report . Th e section s belo w presen t discussion s o f

th e QA/Q C activitie s associated wit h th e overal l qualit

y ofth e dat

aassociated wit

h th e CPT , Althoug h severa

l mino r issue s ar e identifie d an ddiscusse di n th

e followin g sections , th e overal l conclusio n o f the QA/Q C assessmen

t i s tha t th e result s o

f th e testin g ar

e o f hig h quality , an

dar e appropriat

e fo r their intende duse . A fe w mino r

issue s wer

e identifie ddurin g th

e QA/Q C assessment . Thes e issue s an dtheir impac t o n dat ausability ar

e discusse di n greate

r detai l i n followin g sections . 5- 1

VES01743 95. 1 Audi t Sample s Audi t sample s wer

e acquire dfro maSigma-Aldric h RT C fo r metal s an

dhydrogen chloride . Thes e sample s wer e submittedto the analytical laborator y alon g with the sample s collecte ddurin g th

e CPT . Thes e result s ar

e include do n th

e laborator

y report s generate

db y Tes t America . Th e evaluatio n o f th e result s b y Sigm aAldric h RT C i s presentedi n Appendi x G6 . Th e result s o f

th e audi t sample s ar

e summarize di n Tabl e 5-1 . Laborator y analysi s o f

eac h audit sampl e was rate

da s "Acceptable" . Tabl e 5-1 . Result s o

f Analysi s o

f Audi t Sample s Resul t Assigne d

Valu e Evaluatio n Metal s o n Filte r Arseni c (ng/filter ) 20.3 1 21. 0 Acceptabl e Berylliu m (jig/filter ) 12.1 6 11. 3 Acceptabl e Cadmiu m (ng/filter ) 11.72 11. 2 Acceptabl e Chromiu m ((ig/filter ) 17.67 16. 1 Acceptabl e Lea d dig/filter ) 21.6 0 21. 0 Acceptabl e Metal s i n Impinge r Solutio n Arseni c (ug/ml ) 0.188 4 0.20 1 Acceptabl e Berylliu m (ug/ml ) 0.057 6 0.053 0 Acceptabl e Cadmiu m (ug/ml ) 0.1053 0.105 Acceptabl e Chromiu m (ug/ml ) 0.201 7 0.20 2 Acceptabl e Lea d (|Xg/ml

) 0.2102 0.20 2 Acceptabl e Mercur y (ng/ml ) 13. 9 15. 0 Acceptabl e Hydroge n Chlorid e i n Impinge r Solutio n (mg/L ) 30. 4 27. 6 Acceptabl e 5. 2 Analysi s o f Wast e Feed s 5.2. 1 Analysi s o f Waste Feed s fo r Metal s Sample s o f

wast e fee dmaterial s wer

e analyze dfo r

mercur y usin g CVAA , accordin g t o SW-84 6 Metho d7470A . Thes e sam e sample s wer

e als o analyze dfo r

arsenic , beryllium , cadmium , chromium , an

d leadusin g ICPES , accordin g t o SW-84 6 Metho d6010B . Thes e sample s wer

e preparedfo r

analysi s usin g appropriat e extractio n o r

dilutio n techniques . Qualit y assuranc e andqualit

y contro l activitie s associatedwith thes e analyse s included :

• Sample handhng an

dpreservation ;

• Preparatio n an

danalysi s o f

sample s withi n specifie dholdin g times ;

• Preparatio n an

danalysi s o f

laborator y blanks ;
5- 2

VES01744 0• Preparatio n an danalysi s o f

laborator y contro l samples ;

• Duplicate preparation andanalysi s o f receive dsamples ;

• Analysi s o f

duplicat e samples ; an

d

• Preparatio n an

danalysi s o f

matri x spik

e (MS ) an dmatri x spik

e duplicat e (MSD ) samples . Revie w o f

thes e QA/Q C activitie s indicate s tha t thes e dat aar e supportable , an

duseable . Se e th e detaile ddat

aqualit y assessmen

t i n Appendi x H . Th e followin g issue s wer e identifie da

s par t o f thi s dat aqualit y assessment ;

• Th e QAPj P specifie s th

e performanc e o f

matri x spike/matri x spik e duplicate s with 75-125 % recovery , 0-20 % RP D fo r mercur y and70-130 % recovery , 0-20 % RP D fo r othe r metals . On

e hundredeighty-seven o f 20 4 M S or MS D me t th e specification s fo r recovery . On

e hundredo f

10 2 MS/MS D pair s me

t th e specificatio n fo r

RPD . Th e followin g sample s wer

e outsid e th e specification :

—VS2-CS-11B-COMP2B : Arseni c recover y 67 % i n MS , arseni c RP D 23% , chromiu mrecover

y 149 % and172 % i n MS/MSD ;

—VS2-CS-15B-COMP2B : chromiu mrecover y 150 % i n MSD ; VS3-CS-12B-COM P 2B : chromiu mrecover y 13 1 an d145 % i n MS/MSD ;

—VS4-BS-13B-COMP2B : chromiumrecover y 13 2 an d134 % i n MS/MSD , lead recover y 208 % i n MSD ;

—VS4^CS-13B-COMP2B : chromiu mrecover y 16 4 an d186 % i n MS/MSD , lea

d recover y 406 % i n MS , lea

dRP D 49% , mercur

y recover y 6 1 an d45 % i n MS/MSD ; an

d

—VS4-LBW-12B-COMP2B : cadmiumrecover y 145 % i n MSD , mercur

y recover y 7 1 an d 66 % i n MS/MSD . Metal s feedrate s ar

e develope das asu mo f

total s fed.to th

e syste ma s LV M (arsenic , berylliu mandchromium) ; SV M (cadmiumandlead ) andmercury . Th

e MS/MS D outlier s detaile dabov

e indicat e increase duncertaint

y i n th e concentration s ofth e metal s i n thos e streams . The contributio n o f thes e streams t

o th e tota l feedrate s o f LVM , SV M andmercur

y ar e negligible , an

dth e increaseduncertaint

y i n these concentration s ha

s n o impac t on th e conclusion s ofth e report . N o dat aar e qualifie d o r invalidate dbase

do n MS/MS D results .

5- 3

VES01744 15.2. 2 Analysi s o f Wast e Feed s fo r Physica l an d Chemica l Parameter s Sample s o f

liqui dan dsoli dwast

e fee dmaterial s wer

e analyze dfo r

as h content, tota

l chlorine , density , gros s calorifi c value , kinemati c viscosity , an dpercen t moisture , usin g th

e followin g methods :

• As h Content : ASTMD482 ;
• Tota l Chlorine : KNO X WC-0016 ;
• Density : AST M D1963 ;
• Gros s Calorifi c Value : AST M D240 , AST M D5865 ;
• Kinemati c Viscosity : AST M D 445 ; an d
• Percent

Moisture : Metho d160.3 , AST M D017 . Quaht y assuranc e an

dquaht y contro l activitie s associatedwith thes e analyse s included :

• Sampl e handling andpreservation ;
• Preparatio n an

danalysi s o f

sample s withi n specifie dholdin g times ;
• Preparatio n an

danalysi s o f

laborator y blanks ;
• Preparatio n an

danalysi s o f

laborator y contro l samples ;
• Preparatio n an

danalysi s o f

matri x spik

e an dmatri x spike duplicat

e samples ;
• Collectio n an

danalysi s o f

duplicat e samples ; and
• Preparatio n an

danalysi s o f

selectedsample s i n duplicate . Revie w o f

thes e QA/Q C activitie s indicate s tha t dat aar e supportable , an dusable fo r the purpos e o f demonstrating regulator

y compliance . See th

e detaile ddat

aquality assessmen

t i n Appendi x H . Th e followin g issue s wer e identifie ddurin g th

e cours e o f

th e QA/Q C assessment :

• Selecte dsample s wer e analyze di n duplicate . Ninety o f 9 6 duplicat

e analyse s me

t the QAP P specification s (se

e tabl e below) . Th e outlier s are :

- As h i n VS2-HBW-13B-COMP2B ; result s o f 58 2 an d64 6 mg/kg ; RP D o f 10.4% ;

- Gros s Calorifi c Valu e i n VS2-LBW-15B-COMP2B ; result s o f 17 8 an d15 2 Btu/lb ; RP D o f

15.8% ;

- Chlorin e i n VS3-CS-11A-COM P 1 ; result s o f 25 3 an d 32 5 mg/kg ; RP D o f 24.9% ;

- Chlorin e i n VS4-BS-11A-COMP1 ; result s o f 17 1 an d22 1 mg/kg ; RP D o f 25.5% ;

- As h i n VS4-HBW-12B-COMP2B-DUP ; result s o f 94 3 and105 0 mg/kg ; RP D o f 10.7% ; an d

- As h VS4-HBW-13A-COMP1 ; result s o f 1,50 0 and92 8 mg/kg ; RP D o f 47.1% . Th e outlier s fo r

duplicat e analysi s have anegligibl e impac t o n th e usabilit y o f th e data . The chlorine carrie di n containerize dsolid s an dbul k solid s i s negligibl e (<1% ) comparedt

o th e chlorin e provide db y th e spikin g material . The as h carriedi n high

Bt u wast e i s negligibl e (< ] % ) comparedto th e ash provide db y th

e bulk or 5- 4

VES01744 2containerize dsolids . Th e hea t input results i n low-Bt u wast

e ar e nea r th e detectio n limit . Increase

d uncertaint

y i s expected clos e t

o the detectio n hmit . N o dat aar e qualifie do

r invalidate dbased o n th

e results o f

duplicate analysis . • N o duplicat

e analysi s wa s performe dfo r moistur e i n soli dwast

e streams . Thi s duplicat e analysi s wa

s specifie di n th

e QAPjP . Thi s ha s n

o impact o n th e usability o f th e data . Moistur

e result s ar

e used onl y t

o characteriz e th

e wast e fee dmaterials , an

d ar e not used i n an

y demonstration o f

compliance . N o dataar

e qualifie do

r invalidate d based o n thi s omission . 5.3 Stac k

Ga s 5.3. 1 Isokineti c Sampl e Collectio n Isokineti c samplm

g train s wer

e use d fo r

th e collectio n o f

sample s fo r

th e determinatio n of :

• Particulate matte r accordin g t

o EP A Metho d5 ;

• Hydroge n chloride an dchlorin e accordin g t

o Modifie dEP A Metho d26A ;

• Metal s according t

o EP A Metho d29 ; an

dPolychlorinate ddibenzodioxin s an d polychlorinate ddibenzofuran s accordin g t o SW<-84 6 Metho d0023A . Qualit y assuranc e an

dquaht y contro l activitie s associated with the collectio n o f thes e sample s included :

• Collectio n o f

th e specifie dvolume s o f

stac k ga s over th e specifie dduration ;

• Collectio n o f

stac k ga s withi n 90-110 % o f

isokinetic ;

• Maintainin g th

e probe , filte r

and(o n applicabl e trains ) heate d transfe r lin e a t th e specifie dtemperatures ;

• Maintainin g th

e impinge r exi t and(o n applicabl e trains ) th e condense

r exi t a t th e specifie dtemperature ;

• Performin g sampling trai n lea k checks befor

e sampl e collection , a

t por t changes , an

d after sample collection ;

• Performin g pitot

tube lea k checks befor

e andafter

sample collection ; an

d

• Recordin g al l dat

ao n pre-printe d dat

asheets . Revie w o f

thes e QA/Q C activitie s indicate s tha t samplin g was performe daccordin g t o the methods an

dthe QAPjP . Se

e th e detaile ddat

aqualit y assessmen

t i n Appendi x H , Samplin g dat a sheet s ar e presented i n Appendi x F . Calibratio n documentation fo r al l fiel dequipmen

t i s presented i n Appendi x I . N o issue s wer e identifie da

s par t o f th e dat aquaht y assessment .
5- 5

VES01744 35.3. 2 Analysi s o f Stac k Ga s Sample s fo r Determinatio n o f P M Sample s o f

stac k ga s fo r determinatio n o f

particulat

e matte r (PM ) wer

e collecte di n a samplin g trai n meeting th e requirements EP A Metho d5 . Qualit y assurance an

dqualit y contro l activitie s associate dwit h thi s analysi s included :

• Sampl e handlin g an

dpreservation ;
• Preparatio n an

danalysi s o f

sample s withi n specifie dholdin g times;
• Preparatio n an

d analysi s o f

laborator y blanks ;
• Collectio n an

d analysi s o f

fiel dblanks ;
• Repeatabilit

y o f sequentia l weighings ; an

d
• Dail y balanc e calibration . Revie w o f

thes e QA/Q C activitie s indicate s tha t thes e dat aar e supportable , an

duseable . Se

e th e detaile d dat

aqualit y assessmen

t i n Appendi x H . The followin g issu e wa s identifie ddurin g the QA/Q C review :

• Th e fiel dblan

k prob e an dnozzl e rins e ha

d observabl e level s nea

r th e detectio n hmit . Th e level s o f

particulat

e materia l observe di n th

e PN Rsample s wer

e ver y low , and nea r th e detectio n limit . Level s i n th e fiel dsample s wer

e simila r t o thes e results , an

d ma y hav e apositiv e bias . A s apositiv e bia s i s conservativ e relativ e t o th e estimatio n o f emissions , no dat

aar e qualifie do

r invalidate dbase do n fiel dblan k results . 5.3. 3 Analysi s o

f Stac k Ga s Sample s fo r Determinatio n o f HCI/CI 2 Sample s o f

stac k ga s fo r determinatio n o f

hydrogen chlorid e an

dchlorin e (HCI

/CI2 ) wer e collecte di n aModifie dEP A Metho d26 A samplin g train . Sample s recovere dfro mthi s samplin g trai n wer e analyze dfo r

hydroge n clilorid e an dchlorin e usin g io n chromatography , accordin g to EP A Metho d26A . Quality assurance an

dqualit y contro l activitie s associate d wit h these analyse s included :

• Sampl e handlin g an

dpreservation ;
• Preparatio n an

d analysi s o f

sample s withi n specifie dholdin g times ;
• Preparatio n an

danalysi s o f

laborator y blanks ;
• Collectio n an

danalysi s o f

fiel dblanks ;
• Preparatio n an

danalysi s o f

laborator y contro l samples ;
• Preparatio n an

danalysi s o f

matri x spik

e an dmatri x spik

e duplicat e samples ; an

d
• Preparatio n an

danalysi s o f

al l sample s i n duplicate .

5- 6

VES01744 4Revie w o f thes e QA/Q C activitie s indicate s tha t thes e dat aar e supportable , an

d useable . Se

e th e detaile ddat

aqualit y assessmen

t i n Appendi x H . Th e followin g issu e wa s identifie ddurin g th

e QA/Q C review :

• Hydroge n chlorid e wa s consistently detected i n th e fiel dblan

k samples . Th e level s o f hydrogen chlorid e observed(approximately 6 0 |A g pe r sample) ar

e wel l belo w th

e level s observe d i n th

e fiel dsample s (al l greate r tha n 1,80 0 n g pe r sample) . Thes e level s ar e negligibl e an

dhav e n o impac t o n th e data . N o dataar

e qualifie do

r invalidate dbased on blan k results . 5.3. 4 Analysi s o

f Stac k Ga s Sample s fo r Determinatio n o f Metal s Sample s fo r

determination of

metal s i n stac

k ga s wer e collecte daccordin g t

o EP A Metho d29 . Th e filters , impinge r solution s andrinse s wer

e analyze dfo r

mercur y b y CVA A accordin g t

o SW-84 6 Metho d7470 A an dfo r arsenic , beryllium , cadmium , chromium , an dlea d b y ICPES , accordin g t

o SW-84 6 Metho d6010B . Quality assuranc e an

dqualit y contro l activitie s associate dwit h these analyse s included :

• Sampl e handlin g an

dpreservation ;

• Preparatio n an

danalysi s o f

sample s withi n specified.holdin g times ;

• Preparatio n andanalysi s o f laborator y blanks ;

• Collectio n andanalysi s o f fiel dblanks ;

• Preparatio n andanalysi s o f medi achec k

samples ;
• Preparatio n an

danalysi s o f

laborator y contro l sample s (LCS ) an dlaborator

y check sample duplicate s (LCSD) ;

• Preparatio n and analysi s o f matri x spik

e an dmatri x spike duplicat

e samples ; an

d

• Preparatio n and analysi s o f pos t digestio n spik

e (PDS ) an d post

digestio n spik

e duplicat e (PDSD ) samples . Revie w o f

thes e QA/Q C activitie s indicate s tha t thes e dat aar e supportable , an

duseable . Se

e th e detaile ddat

aqualit y assessmen

t i n Appendi x H . Th e followin g issue s wer e identifie ddurin g th e QA/Q C review :

• Arseni c wa

s foun dabov

e th e detectio n limi t

i n laborator

y blank sample s associated with analysi s o f

PNR/filte r

samples . Th e blan

k result s fo r

arseni c i n th

e laborator

y blank s ar e nea r th e detection hmit , andsimila r t o or belo w th e result s fo r

th e fiel d samples . Thi s ma

y indicat e asligh t positiv e bia s i n the fiel dresults . Sample s wer e no t corrected fo r

fiel dblan k results . N o result s ar

e invalidate do

r quahfie dbased o n blan k results . 5- 7

VES01744 5• Cadmiu man dmercur y wer e eac h foun di n on

e fiel dblank

sample . Th e singl e positiv e resul

t fo r cadmiumi n on

e fiel dblan

k i s simila r i n magnitud

e t o th e fiel d results . The singl e positiv e result fo r mercur y i n on e fiel dblank

i s nea r th e detectio n limit , andwel l belo w man y o f th e fiel dresults . Thes e ma

y indicate aslight

positiv e bia s i n th e fiel dsamples . Sample s wer e no t correcte dfo r

fiel dblan

k results . N o results ar e invalidate do

r quahfie dbase do n blan

k results . • Chromiu mwa

s consistentl

y observe di n fiel dblank s andmedi achec k samples . Th e consisten t observation o f

chromiu mi n fiel dblan

k an dmedi acheck

sample s i s a

t a lowe r leve l tha n th e fiel dsamples . Thi s ma

y indicat e asligh t positiv e bia s i n th

e results fo r th e fiel dsamples . Sample s wer e not correcte dfo r

fiel dblank

results . N o result s ar e invalidate do

r qualifie dbase do n blan

k results . 5.3. 5 Analysi s o

f Stac k Ga s Sample s fo r Determinatio n o f Dioxins/Furan s Sample s fo r

determination o f

th e polychlorinate ddibenzodioxin s anddibenzofuran s (dioxins/furans ) wer

e collecte daccordin g to th e methodolog y describe di n SW-84 6 Metho d0023A . The filters , sorben t traps , an drinse s fro mthes e sample s wer e preparedfo r analysi s accordin g t

o SW-84 6 Metho d0023A , andth e resultin g extract s analyze dfo r dioxins/furan s b y high-resolutio n GCMS , accordin g t o SW-84 6 Metho d8290 . Quality assurance an

dquaht y contro l activitie s associatedwith thes e analyse s included :

• Sampl e handhn

g an dpreservation ;

• Preparatio n an

danalysi s o f

sample s withi n specifie dholdin g times ;

• Preparatio n an

danalysi s o f

laborator y blanks ;

• Collectio n an

danalysi s of

fiel dblanks ;

• Preparatio n an

danalysi s o f

medi achec k

samples ;

• Preparatio n an

danalysi s o f

laborator y contro l sample s an

dlaborator

y chec k sampl e duplicates ; an

d

• Additio n o f

surrogat e compound s t

o eac h sample . Revie w o f

thes e QA/Q C activitie s indicate s tha t thes e dat aar e supportable , an

duseable . Se e th

e detaile ddat

aqualit y assessmen

t i n Appendi x H . Th e followin g issu e wa s identifie ddurin g th

e QA/Q C revie w o f

these data :

• Al l targe

t analyte s excep

t 2,3,7,8-TCD D wer

e observe di n amedi acheck sample , laborator y blan k o r fieldblank . Th e level s observedi n th e blank sample s ar

e ver y low , typicall y nea

r th e detectio n limit . Typicall y thes e level s ar e belo w th

e level s observedi n th

e fiel dsamples . Thi s indicate s apotentia l positiv e bia s i n th

e field samples , whic h i s conservativ e relativ e t o th e determinatio n o f

emissio n rate . N o dat

a ar e qualifie do

r invalidate dbasedon blank results . 5- 8

VES01744 6i ! 5.3. 6 Monitorin g o

f Stac k Ga s fo r 0 2 , C0 2 , an d TH C The stack ga s wa s monitoredfo r

oxyge n (0 2 ) , carbo n dioxid e (CO2) , andtota l hydrocarbon s (THC ) according t o EP A Method s 3 A an d25A , respectively . Quality assurance an

dqualit y contro l activitie s associatedwith continuou s emissio n monitorin g include :

• Us e o f

calibratio n ga

s standard s o f

know n an

dacceptabl e quality ;
• Us e o f

calibratio n ga

s standard s i n th

e specifie dranges , • Performanc e o f

syste mbia s checks , • Performanc e o f

cahbratio n error

tests ; and
• Performanc e o f

zer o an dspa n drif t checks . Revie w o f

thes e QA/Q C activitie s indicate s tha t thes e dat aar e supportabl e an

dusable . Se

e th e dataquaht

y assessmen

t i n Appendi x H Copie s o f certification s o f

calibratio n ga

s standards ar

e presente d i n Appendi x LRa w dat afo r continuou s emissio n monitor s ar e presented i n Appendi x F . Th e followin g issu e wa s identifie ddurin g the QA/Q C revie w o f thi s data :

• Sevent

y o f 72 drif t checks fo r

total hydrocarbon s me

t metho dspecifications . The tw o outlier s wer

e bot h durin g Uni t

2 Ru n IB . A drif

t o f 8.0 % wa s see n a t 1800 , an dadrif t o f 8.3 % wa s observe da t 1909 . I n accordanc e with EP A Metho d25A , th e total hydrocarbo n analyze

r wa s immediatel y re-calibrate dfollowin g eac h o f the drif t excursions . Th

e dat afro mth e ru n was then recalculate dusin g bot h cahbratio n curve s andth e highe r (mor e conservative ) result

reported . A s th

e average TH C wa s wel l belo w th e standard , an

dtha t th e conservativ e recalculatio n approac h specifie di n th e metho dwa

s implemented , an

y uncertaint

y i n thes e dat

aha s n o impac t

o n th e conclusio n o f

th e repor t an dth e demonstratio n o f

comphance . N o dat

aar e flagge do r invalidate dbase

do n th e cahbratio n drif

t results . 5. 4 Proces s Data I n accordanc e wit

h th e MAC T requirements , al l proces s instrumentatio n wa s cahbrated . A Continuous Monitoring System Performance Evaluation Test Plan (CMSPETP ) wa

s prepared an ddefine s th

e calibratio n procedure s an dacceptanc e criteria . Th e testin g specifie di n th e CMSPET P wa

s performe dprio r

t o th e CPT . Dat afro mth

e CMSPE T i s presented i n Appendi x D .

5- 9

VES01744 75. 5 Spikin g A s detaile di n Section s 1. 3 and2. 3 an

dAppendi x B , durin g th

e CPT , liquid s andsolid s wer e spike dinto th

e incinerato

r feed . QA/Q C activitie s associate d with th e spikin g included :

• Us e o f

spikin g material s o f

know n andacceptabl e quahty ;

• Collectio n o f

dat ao n dat asheet s an dappropriat

e dat aacquisitio n systems ;

• Cahbratio n o f

pumps ; and

• Documentatio n of

preparatio n o f

spikin g packets . Revie w o f

thes e QA/Q C activitie s indicate s tha t th e spikin g dat

aar e supportable anduseable .

5-1 0

VES01744 8

# VES017449-017462.pd f

# Revie

w o f Monitorin

g Experienc

e wit h th e Xact ® Multi Meta l Continuou

s Emission

s Monito r
Pape r #2 9 Presente dat

th e 33 r dInternationa l Conferenc e o n Therma l Treatmen t Technologie s & Hazardou s Wast e Combustor s Octobe r 13-15,201 4 Baltimore , M D Kra g Petterso n Coope r Environmenta l Services , LLC , Beaverton , O R 

### ABSTRAC T Th e Xac t 64 0 i s amulti-metal s Continuou s Emission s Monito r (CEM ) base do n X-ra y fluorescenc e an dreactiv e filter tape technology . Th e Xac t wa s ceitifie das acomplianc e CE M as par t o f an alternativ e monitorin g pla n a t ahazardou s wast

e incinerator. 1, 2A s par

t ofth e certificatio n proces s th e Xac t underwen

t aMetho d301 3 procedur e to validat e it s accurac y an d precision . Thi s presentatio n wil l revie w th e tes t result s fro mthi s Metho d30 1 vahdatio n as wel l a s th e result s fro msubsequen t annua l relativ e accurac y testin g durin g the si x year s i t wa s use da s acomphanc e instrument . I n addition , th e presentatio n wil l revie w th e result s fromseveral othe r test s involvin g the Xact , includin g multi-metal s testin g o n acoa l fire dsourc e a s wel l as mercur

y measurement s o n severa l coa l fired powe r plants . Finally , th e presentatio n wil l als o outlin e testin g tha

t wil l occu r

durin g an upcomin g demonstratio n projec t sponsore db y the Sout

h Coas t Ai r Quality Monitorin g Distric t o n tw o secondar

y lea dsmelters . 

### BACKGROUN D Unde r th e Clean Ai r

Ac t amendments o f

199 0 th e Unite dState s Environmenta l Protectio n Agenc y (U S EPA ) ha s th e authorit y t o regulate hazardou s metal emission s fromsource s usin g a Maximu mAchievabl e Contro l Technolog y (MACT ) approach . Severa l sourc e categorie s currentl y hav e regulate demissio n level s fo r metal s includin g coa l fire dpowe r plants, 4 hazardou s wast e incinerators, 5 medica l wast e incinerators 6 an dPortlan dcemen t plants. 7 Ofte n thes e source s ar

e regulate dusin g or

a t leas t allowin g particulat e matte r (PM ) as asurrogat

e fo r metal s emission s (e.g . coa l fire dpowe r plants , Portlan dcemen

t plants) . I n other

case s actua l meta l measurements o f

meta l emission s ar

e require dbu t

no t o n acontinuou s basis . I n thes e case s perfomianc e testin g o f

contro l equipmen

t ma y b e performe dperiodicall y usin g Metho d29 8

1

VES01744 9alon g wit h representativ e momtorin g o f the wast e strea mdurin g norma l operatio n (e.g . Hazardou s Waste Incinerators) . Th e U S EP A has , however , indicate dtha t i t may , fo r certai n sources , prefe r

t o se e continuou s metal s momtorin g usin g amulti-metal s CEMS . Fo r example , i n 199 6 whe n th e origina l hazardou s wast

e incinerato r

MAC T rul e wa s propose di t containe dan optio n to perfor mmetal s monitorin g wit h amulti-metal s CEMS, 9 however , th e optio n wa s later

withdraw n sinc e n o ther e wer e n o commerciall y availabl e multi-metal s CEM S a t th e time . Mor e recently , i n 2013 , th e U S EP A unsuccessfull y attempte d to require th e us e o f amulti-metal s CEM S a s par t o f ai r permi t fo r aspecifi c hazardou s wast e incineratio n facihty. 1 0EP A als o requeste d commen t o n th e us e o f lead(Pb ) CEM S a

s par t ofth e propose dsecondar y lea dsmelte

r MACT 1 1 an di s likel y t o continu e to explore th

e us e o f multi-metal s CEM S o n severa l source s regulate dfo r

metal s includin g hazardou s wast e incinerator s an dmedica l wast e incinerator s as th e MAC T rule s fo r thes e sourc e categorie s com e up fo r review . Th e Xac t i s amulti-metal s continuou s emission s monito r base do n X-Ra y Fluorescenc e (XRF ) develope db y Cooper

Envhonmenta l Services , LL C (CES) . Th e instrument operate s b y withdrawin g alarg e sampl e o f stac k effluen t fro mth e sourc e an dtransportin g i t t o th e instrument . A subsampl e o f thi s mai n flo w i s the n draw n throug h areactiv e filte r tap e mounte d on areel-to-ree l typ e tap e drive . Th e filte r tap e capture s both vapo r phas e an dparticulate phas e metals . Followin g sampling , th e deposi t i s automaticall y advance dint o th e analysi s are awher e i t i s analyze dusin g XR Fto determine th e mas s o f eac h meta

l whil e th e nex t

sampl e i s collected . Th e stac k concentratio n (pg/dscm) i s determine d b y dividin g the XR Fdetermine dmas s (pg ) b y th e total sampl e flow throug h th e tap e (dscm) . Th e Xac t i s abl e t o measur

e concentration s o f nearl y al l ofth e metal s o n the U S EPA' s hs t o f hazardou s ai r

pollutant s mcludin g antimon y (Sb) , arseni c (As) , cadmiu m(Cd) , chromiu m(Cr) , cobal t (Co) , lea d(Pb) , manganes e (Mn) , merciu y (Hg) , nicke l (Ni) , an dseleniu m(Se) . 

### EXPERIMENTA L Th e wor k

describe di n thi s documen t span s severa l year s an dseveral differen t apphcation s ofth e Xac t t o variou s source s including : 1 ) Metho d30 1 validatio n ofth e Xac t CEM S 2 ) Operatio n ofth e instrumen t fo r approximatel y si x year s o n aga s fire dhazardou s wast e incinerato r 3 ) Brie f stud y evaluatin g th

e feasibiht y o f

measurin g metal s wit h th e Xac t o n acoa l fired sourc e 4 ) Tw o studie s evaluatin g th e accurac y o f

mercur y measuremen

t wit h the Xac t

o n coa l fue d powe r plants . Wit h th e exceptio n o f

wor k don e measurin g mercury o n coa l firedpowe r plant s th e accurac y o f th e Xac t wa s evaluate dusin g adynami c spikin g procedur e i n whic h the instrument wa s challenge dwit h know n concentration s ofth e element s o f interest . Thes e procedure s utiliz e th e Quantitativ e Aeroso l Generator (QAG ) whic h ha s itsel f unde r gon e evaluatio n an dMetho d30 1 testing. 1 2Th e QA G operate s b y nebulizin g asolutio n containin g aNationa l Ihstirut e o f Standard s 2

VES01745 0an d Technolog y (NIST ) traceabl e concent r atio n o f metal s (C s ) a t ameasure drat

e (R) int o a measure d flo w (F). Th e concentratio n o f th e resultin g aeroso l (C a ) i s give n b y equatio n 1 . C a= Equatio n 1 . Tli e aeroso l i s spike dinto asubsampl e o f stac k ga s bein g draw n int o th

e instrument . B y spikin g actua l stac k gas , th e potential effec t

o f differen t

interferin g component s presen t i n the stac k effluen t i s evaluated . Th e QA G wa s utilize dinsteado f Metho d2 9 becaus e o f

the precisio n an d accurac y o f

Metho d2 9 ar

e aroun d15% 1 3 " 1 5 an d ar e no t sufficien t

t o evaluat

e the precisio n an d accurac y o f

th e Xact . 

### Metho d 30 1 Validatio

n ofth e Xac

t Th e Metho d30 1 validatio n o f th e Xac t wa s performe do n aga

s firedhazardou s wast

e incinerato r a t El i Lilly' s Tippecano e Laboratorie s i n Wes t Lafayette , Indiana . Th e incinerato r burne dwast

e associate dwit h Lilly' s dru g productio n an dwa s equippe dwit h ba g hous e an dawe t scrubber . Durin g th e test , QA G aeroso l containin g five regulate d metal s mcludin g arseni c (As) , cadmiu m (Cd) , chromiu m(Cr) , lea d(Pb ) an dmercury (Hg ) wer e spike dint o asubsampl e o f stac k gas . Eac h meta l wa s spike d a t thre e differen t

nornina l concentratio n level s (20,4 0 an d11 0 pg/dscm) . Th e Xac t the n sample dth

e spike dstac k

ga s an dth

e Xac t reporte dresult s wer

e evaluate dfo r precision , accurac y an d linearity . 

### Operatio n ofth e Xac

tOve r Severa l Year s Th e Xac t wa s certifie da

s acomphanc e metal s monitorin g instrument a t th e El i Lill y incinerato r base di n par

t o n it s Metho d30 1 vahdation. 2Th e Xac t the n operate da

t tha t faciht y fo r

aperio do f approximatel y si x year s durin g whic h tim e i t ha d to continuousl y meet several performanc e criteria. 161 7 Eac h require dtest i s liste dbelo w alon g wit h abrie f descriptio n an dit s require d testin g frequenc y i s i n parentheses . 1) Upscale Calibration Drift Check (Daily) Durin g th e upscal e calibratio n drif t chec k the XR Fportio n o f

th e Xac t i s challenge dwit h soli dsampl e containin g several ke y metal s measure db y the instrument fo r comphanc e purposes . Th e standar

d consist s o f

aro d wit h abi t

o f materia l a

t th e en dtha t i s injecte dinto th e analysi s are aonc e per

day . Th e concentratio n ofthi s standar di s detennine dimmediatel y followin g cahbratio n an d the n subsequen t check s ofth e Xac t

verif y the stabilit y ofth e XR F syste mafte r

that . Th e reporte dconcentratio n fo r each o f the metal s o n th e dail y calibratio n drif t standar dnee d t o b e withi n 15 % o f th e referenc e concentratio n eac h da y fo r th e instrumen

t t o remai n i n comphance .

2) Zero Drift

Check (Daily)

VES01745 1Th e zer o drif t check involve dchallengin g the Xact' s XR Fanalyzer wit h ablan k

sectio n o f tape onc e pe

r day . Th e differenc e between th e valu e ofth e zero standar dan dthe CEM S reporte d concenhatio n mus t b e les s tha

n 20 % ofth e applicabl e emissio n limit . 3) Flow Check

(Daily) Durin g th e flo w check , the readin g fro mth e Xact' s sampl e flo w mete r i s checke dagains t

a secon d quaht

y assuranc e (QA ) flo w meter . Th e differenc e between the sampl e flow mete r an dth e Q A flow mete

r neede dt o b e les s tha

n 20 % ofth e ful l scal e valu e ofth e meter . 4) XRF Audit (Quarterly) Th e XR Faudi t

evaluate s th e accurac y o f the XR Fanalyze r

portio n o f

the Xact . Durin g th

e audi t th e XR Fanalyzer

i s challenge d wit h aserie s o f thi n fil mstandards . Thes e standard s ar e produce d b y vapo r

depositio n ont

o afilte r an dar e commerciall y availabl e fro m Micromatte r

Co. 1 8 Th e standard s ar

e gravimetricall y traceabl e t o NIS T standard s an dhave bee n recommen dfo r

us e b y th e U S EP A i n cahbratin g XR Fequipmen t use dt o measur

e ambient ai r filter samples. 1 9 Th e differenc e betwee n th e referenc e concentratio n ofth e standardan dth

e concentratio n reporte db y th e Xac t mus t b e les s tha

n 10 % ofth e referenc e concentratio n fo r

th e mstrument

dat at o b e use d fo r

comphanc e purposes . 5) Flow Audit

(Quarterly) Th e flo w audi t

evaluate s th

e accurac y ofth e Xact' s flo w system . The reading s fron i bot h th e sampl e an ddilutio n flo w meter s ar e compare dto a n independen t NIS T traceabl e referenc e flo w meter . Th e erro r

betwee n th

e Xac t flo w mete

r an dth e referenc e flo w mete r nee dt o b e les s than 10 % o f

the referenc e flow , 6) Relative Accuracy Test Audit (Annually) Finally , the Xac t

wa s challenge dwit h adynamicall y spike dareferenc e aeroso l a t three differen t concentratio n level s o n a t leas t an annua

l basis . Th e referenc e aeroso l durin g eac h tes t wa s generated usin g th

e QA G an d spike dint o th e Xact' s sampl e flow syste mas nea r a s possibl e to th

e prob e tip . Th e Xac t

reporte d concentratio n wa s the n plotte dagains t th e referenc e aeroso l concentratio n an d alinear leas t square s regressio n fit

wa s performed o n th e data . Th e slop e o f

thi s bes t fi t lin e neede dt o b e betwee n 0.8 0 an d1.20 , th e conelatio n coefficien t

needed t o b e greate

r than 0.9 0 an dintercep t

neededt o be les s than 20 % ofth e emissio n limi t

fo r the instrument

to pas s it s relativ e accurac y test . 

### Evaluatio n o f th e Xac tMulti-Metal s CEM S o n a Coa l Fire d Sourc

e A s par t o f a n EP A sponsore dsmal l busines s innovativ e researc h (SBIR ) gran t th e accurac y o f th e Xac t multi-metal s CEM S wa s evaluate do n apilo t scal e coa l fire dsource . Testin g wa s performe da

t the U S EPA' s Mult i Pollutan t Contro l Researc h Facilit y (MPCRF ) locate di n Researc h Triangl e Paric , Nort h Carolina . Th e MPCR Fi s abl e t o fire pulverize dcoal , distillat e oil , an do r

natural ga

s a t 4 millio n Btu/hr . Th e facilit y i s equippe dwit h wet an ddry flue ga

s cleanin g system s an dclosel y simulate s ful l scal e emission s sources . Durin g th e stud y wit h th e Xac t th e facilit y burne d bituminou s coa l an dutilize da n ES P an dwe t scrubber conhols . Th e

VES01745 2Xac t extracte dasampl e o f

effluen t downstrea

mo f al l controls . Th e extracte deffluen t wa s dynamicall y spike dwit h fiv e differen t metal s (As , Cd , Cr , Pb , Hg ) a t thre e differen t concenhatio n level s (27 , 9 2 an d25 0 ng/dscm) usin g th e QAG . Th e Xac t reporte d concentratio n wa s plotte d agains t

th e referenc e aeroso l concentratio n an d alinea r leas t square s regressio n fi t wa s perfomied . The accurac y ofth e Xac t wa s evaluate do n th e basi s o f slope , conelatio n coefficien t

an d intercept . 

### Measuremen

to f Mercur y wit h th e Xac to n Coa l Fire d Powe

r Plant s Thi s pape

r als o summarize s th e result s o f tw o distinc t

studie s evaluatin g the accurac y ofth e Xact' s mercur

y measuremen

t o n coa l fire dpowe r

plants . Durin g bot h studie s the accurac y o f th e Xac t wa s determine d b y comparin g i t to Metho d30B 2 0 , asorben t tra p approac h to measurin g mercury . Th e firs t

study wa s performe do n a58 5 M W facihty , burnin g subbituminou s coa l an d operatin g wit h ES P controls . Th e Xac t wa s deploye da

t thi s faciht y fo r

thre e week s an d compariso n testin g too k

plac e o n on

e o f thos e days . Th e secon d stud

y wa s performe da

t a750M W sourc e binnin g tw o separat e blend s o f

lignit e an d Powde r Rive r Basi n (PRB ) coa l (60/4 0 an d80/2 0 blend s o f lignite/PRB) . Th e facilit y wa s equippe d wit h a n ES P an dwe t scrubber , bu t

al l o f the Xac t samplin g wa s don e downstrea mo f a singl e ES P modul e an d upshea mofth e we t scrubber , h i addition , th e facilit y wa s testin g tw o separat e mercur y contro l option s - activate dpowdere dcarbo n an dEMO , abroniin e base d additive . Ehuin g th e cours e o f th e approximatel y tw o wee k tes t the Xac t reporte dmercur

y concenhatio n wa s compare dt o Metho d30 B measure dconcentratio n a t severa l time s eac h day . 

### RESULT S AN D DISCUSSIO N Metho d 30 1 Validation Result

s Durin g th

e Metho d30 1 validatio n o f th e Xac t th e bias , precisio n an dlinearit y o f the Xac t were detennine d b y comparin g th e Xact' s reporte d concenhatio n wit h referenc e aeroso l concentratio n oye r three differen t

concentratio n level s (nominall y 20,4 5 an d 11 0 u.g/dscm ) an dazer o concentration . Th e bia s wa s calculate dfo r eac h elemen

t a t eac h datapoin t

usin g Equatio n 2

Bi = ' Q*c • 10 0 Equatio n 2

where : B

—Th e Xact' s bia s fo r

the i * elemen

t relativ e t o th

e QA G expresse da

s apercentag e C/ f = Th e concentratio n ofth e i * elemen t a s measure db y th

e Xac t cf AG = Th e concenhatio n ofth e r * elemen t i n th e QA G aeroso l Th e precisio n o f

th e Xac t wa s calculatin g b y firs t determinin g th

e relativ e percent

standar d deviatio n as show n i n equatio n 3 . 5

VES01745 3Equatio n 3

where : V/=th e tota l variabilit y ofth e 1 t helemen t SDi= th e standar ddeviatio n ofth e i 01 elemen t Ci = the averag e concentratio n o f th e 1 t helemen

t Becaus e ther

e i s rando mvariabilit y associate dwit h bot h th e QA G aeroso l concentratio n as wel l th e Xac t measurement , th e tota l variabilit y (V?) i s a n indicato r

ofth e overal l variabiht y o f bot h th e QA G aeroso l generatio n an dthe Xac t measurement . Th e individua l variabiht y o f jus t th e Xac t measure d concenhatio n the n i s determine db y dividin g the tota l variabiht y b y th e squar e roo t o f 2 a s show n i n equatio n 4 . V t = ^ Equatio n 4 where : I^i=th e precisio n o f

th e Xac t measuremen

t fo r the r * elemen

t l^'=the tota l precisio n o f the r * elemen

t Tabl e 1 summarize s th e result s fo r both th e averag e bia s an daverag e precisio n fo r th e Xac t fo r each ofth e fiv e teste d element s over al l thre e concentratio n levels . I h general , ther e wa s les s tha n 10 % differenc e betwee n th e Xac t reporte dconcentration s an dth e know n concentratio n o f th e referenc e aerosol . Onl y th e bia s fo r mercui y wa s detennine dt o b e statisticaU y significan t an d 6% ofth e bia s wa s later

determine dt o b e du e to acahbratio n erro r fo r mercuiy . Th e averag e variabiht y o f

th e Xac t wa s als o les s tha

n 2% fo r eac h element

indicatin g tha

t the Xact' s measurements wer

e extremel y precis e an d consistent . TaM e 1 . Xac t

Metho d30 1 Result s fo r Measuremen t

Bia s an dVariabilir y Elemen t N Averag e Bia s (% ) Averag e Variabilit y (% ) C r 4 0 8. 2 1. 6 A s 4 0 4. 9 1. 7 H g 4 0 1 6 1. 4 P b 4 0 7. 9 1. 5 C d 4 0 5. 2 1. 9 Figur e 1 show s the overal l linea r regressio n fo r

al l o f th e metal s teste d over

al l thre e concentratio n level s an d azer o concentration . Th e slop e ofth e linear regressio n fi t

wa s 0.9 5 indicatin g exceUen

t agreemen

t between th e Xac t

measure dconcentratio n an dth e QA G referenc e aerosol . Th e intercep t

wa s slightl y greate

r than 1 ug/dsc mindicatin g ver y littl e backgroun dbia s 6

VES01745 4an d th e conelatio n coefficien t was gieater

than 0.9 9 indicatin g ver y httl e scatte r i n the dat

aan d goo dprecision. 1 2 Figur e 1 . Xac t

Linearit y Durin g Metho d30 1 Validatio n 

### 14 0

QA G Referenc e Concentratio n (ug/dscm ) 

### Operatio n o f th e Xac tOve r Severa l Year s Tli e Xac t operate dfo r

severa l years a

t E h Lilly' s hazardou s wast e incinerato r

an ddurin g tha

t tim e me t al l ofth e daily , quarterl y an dannual qualit y assuranc e requirements . Some sampl e upscal e cahbratio n chec k result s fromMarc h of200 6 t o Marc h o f

200 7 ar e show n i n Figur e 2 . Durin g tha

t entir e 1 2 month perio dth

e Xac t upscal e drif

t exceede dit s upscal e cahbratio n drif t criteri ao n onl y tw o occasions . Tabl e 2 show s al l th e quarterl y XR Fan dflo w audi t result s fo r th e entir e complianc e operatio n perio dfrom200 7 to 2010 . Durin g tha t fou r yea r spa n the Xac t passe dal l o f

it s quarterl y audi t

requhements . Finally , tabl e three show s th e result s fromsi x separat e relativ e accu

r ac y tes t audit s (RATA ) over

aspa n o f fiv e years . Th e Xac t

me t th e RAT A criteri ai n al l cases , however , i n 200 6 an d200 8 asmal l correctio n facto r neede dt o b e apphe dt o th e mstrumen

t datafo r arsenic . Figur e 2 . Dail y Upscal e Result s fro mMarc h 200 6 t o Marc h 200 7 7

VES01745 5250 0 I 200 0 X 3 0 3 | r 150 0 o £ 3

~ 100 0 0 ) o c o O 50 0 1 

### IkffS

o Feb-0 6 • C d

• C r A H g P b

May-0 6 Aug-0 6 Nov-0 6

Dat e Mar-0 7

VES01745 6Tabl e 2 . Quarterl y Flo w an d XR FAudi t Result s fro m200 7 t o 201 0 Audi t Yea r Quarte

r Flo

w Erro r {%) XR

F Audi tErro r {% ) Audi t Yea r Quarte

r Flo

w Erro r {%) C

r A

s C

d H

g P

b 200 7 1 3.0 4 1.4

6 2.1 8 2.8 4 1.7

5 2.3

4 2 3.1

3 3.3

2 0.1

3 4.2

3 2.6

0 2.9

6 200 7 3 0.6 8 -3.7

4 2.18 -4.1 3 2.3

6 2.7

6 200 7
4 1.4 2 6.5

0 0.3

6 7.3

6 4.1 8 0.4 0 200 8 1 N A 0.2

2 .1 1 1.2 0 -0.9

9 0.8

7 2 1.0

7 1.9

3 .6

6 1.8

2 2.1 6 2.3 4 200 8 3 0.5 3 2.9

6 2.6 1 3.3 0 2.5

3 0.6

8 200 8
4 1.3 7 1.7

7 0.7

2 1.4

8 0.5

6 1.0

6 200 9 1 2.10 0.6 0 2.9

4 1.5

2 3.4

5 0.4

6 2 3.6

7 1.4

9 4.0

9 1.0

7 1.7

8 0.3

0 200 9 3 0.8 4 2.0

0 5.4

3 2.7

8 0.7

2 0.2

2 200 9
4 N A N

A N

A N

A N

A N

A 201 0 1 N A 1.6

0 5.1

3 0.4

5 0.7 1 2.1 1 2 N

A 1.6

1 5.9

2 1.1

2 4.0

0 0.9

6 201 0 3 1.6 8 -3.4

7 -0.9

2 -2.8

2 -2.4

2 -2.1 1 201 0
4 N A 2.0

0 0.8

2 2.7

0 1.8

3 2.9 1 Averag e 1.7

7 1.3

5 2.1 6 1.6 6 1.6

8 1 .2

2 N A - Dat a no tavailabl

e Tabl e 3 . Annua l QA G RAT A Result s Yea r Slop e

C r A s C d H g P b Annua l Averag e 200 6 0.8 3 0.9 0 0.8 5 0.8 2 0.8 5 0.8 5 200 6 (Quarterly ) 0.9 1 0.7 7 0.9 5 0.9 2 0.9 3 0.8 9 200 7 0.8 4 0.8 2 0.8 8 0.8 4 0.8 1 0.8 4 200 8 0.9 6 0.7 1 0.9 8 0.9 9 0.9 7 0.9 2 200 9 0.9 6 0.9 9 0.9 9 1.1 0 1.0 0 1.0 1 201 0 0.9 7 1.06 1.1 1 1.0 2 1.0

4 1.0

4 Averag e fo r Eac h Element 0.9 1 0.8 7 0.9 6 0.9 5 0.9 3 0.9 3



### Result s ofth e Evaluation ofth e Xac to n a Coa l Fire d Sourc

e Tabl e 4 show s th

e result s ofth e evaluatio n ofth e Xact' s accurac y o n acoa l firedsource . Durin g th e stud y th e Xac t wa s chaUenge d wit h three concentratio n level s usin g CES ' quantitativ e aeroso l generator . A s wit h th e Metho d30 1 testin g the Xac t effluen t wa s dynamicall y spike dto tes t fo r any potential interference s fromth e coa l firedeffluent . Fo r eac h element , th e Xac t 9

VES01745 7reporte dconcentration s wer e plotte dagains t

the know n referenc e aeroso l concentratio n an da leas t square s regressio n analysi s wa s performed . I n al l cases , th e Xac t slop e wa s between 1.0

0 an d1.1 5 wit h correlatio n coefficient s greate r tha n 0.99 . Thi s indicate dtha t ther e wer e n o measuremen

t matri x effect s associate demission s fro macoa l fire dsourc e an dtha t th e Xac t i s abl e t o accuratel y measur e many o f

th e ke y metal s o f

interes t o n suc h asource. 2 1 Tabl e 4 . Result s fro mAccurac y Testin g o n aCoa l Fire dSourc e Elemen t N Slop e Correlatio n Coefficien t C r 2 8 1.0 9 >0.9 9 A s 2 8 1.1 4 >0.9 9 C d 2 8 1.1 1 >0.9 9 H g 2 8 1.1 4 >0.9 9 Pb 2 8 1.0 0 >0.9 9 

### Mercur y Measuremen

twit h th e Xac to n a Coal Fire d Powe

r Plan t Durin g testin g o n a58 5 M W coa l firedfacilit y equippe dwit h ES P control s the mercur y concentratio n a

s reporte d b y th

e Xac t wa s compare dagains t

metho d30B . Th e percen t differenc e betwee n the Xac t an dMetho d30 B wa s 3.53%. 2 2Thes e result s ar e show n graphicall y i n Figur e 3 . Figur e 3 . Xac t

Compariso n wit h Metho d30 B
1 0 9 8

c 3 5 4 

# I 3 XLX L 

### • •

• CE S Xac t

• Metho d 30 B

5 6 7 8 9 1 0 1 1 12 1 3 RAT A Number

1 0

VES01745 8Additiona l compaiison s hav e been mad e betwee n Metho d30 B an dth e Xac t a t anothe r coa l fire d powe r plant . Thi s 75 0 M W facilit y was biuiiin g lignite-PR B coa l blend s an dtestin g tw o differen t mercui y conho l technologie s (powde r activate dcarbo n an dEMO) . Ove r the entir e tw o wee k perio d2 1 comparison s wer e mad e between th

e Xac t an dMetho d30 B unde

r avariety o f stac k effluen t conditions . Th e averag e percent differenc e betwee n th e Xac t an d Metho d30 B wa s 6.0 % demonshatin g th e accurac y o f the Xact' s mercur

y measurements . Th e result s ar e summarize di n Tabl e 5 . Tabl e 5 . Xac t

Mercur y Measurement s Wit h an d Withou t Mercur y Contro l Fue l Condition s Dat e Tim e H g Control s Metho d

30 B (ug/dscm ) Xac t

(pg/dscm ) Percen t

Differenc e 60 % 10/3/1 2 11:4 5 Baselin e 24.5 7 22.5 9 -8. 1 lignit e 10/3/1 2 14:4 5 EM O 14.8 5 15.3 3 3. 2 40 % PR B 10/3/1 2 16:4 5 EM O 16.3 0 15.8 3 -2. 9

10/5/1 2 12:1 5 EMO & PA C 9.2 5 10.0 9 9. 0 10/5/1 2 16:4 5 EMO & PA C 11.5 2 12.7 4 10. 6 10/5/1 2 17:4 5 EMO & PA C 4.0 5 5.8 8 45. 2 10/6/1 2 10:4 5 Baselin e 24.0 3 24.5 5 2. 2 10/6/1 2 13:4 5 EMO & PA C 11.1 4 12.3 4 10. 8 10/6/1 2 15:4 5 EMO & PA C 5.7 4 7.9 7 38. 8 10/6/1 2 18:4 5 EMO & PA C 13.9 2 15.7 2 13. 0 80 % 10/9/1 2 10:1 5 Baselin e 28.1 4 25.0 7 -10. 9 Lignit e 10/9/1 2 12:1 5 P A C 19.0 1 19.2 6 1. 3 20 % PR B 10/9/1 2 16:1 5 PA C 7.00 7.3 4 4. 9

10/10/1 2 10:3 0 Baselin e 23.1 9 23.9 8 3. 4 10/10/1 2 13:4 5 EM O 18.7 3 20.2 2 8. 0 10/10/1 2 16:4 5 EM O 20.1 0 22.1 0 10. 0 10/10/1 2 19:4 5 E M O 18.6 0 22.1 1 18. 8 10/10/1 2 9:00 Baselin e 21.5 7 18.6 9 -13. 4 10/11/1 2 9:0 0 Baselin e 24.0 0 23.5 3 -1. 9 10/11/1 2 10:4 5 EM O 20.5 2 18.9 0 -7. 9 10/11/1 2 11:3 0 EM O 21.3 8 19.5 5 -8. 6 Averag e Percen t

Differenc e Unde r

Baselin e Condition s -4. 8 Averag e Percen t

Differenc e wit h H g Control s 7. 6 Overal l Percen t

Differenc e 6. 0

1 1

VES01745 9

### CONCLUSIO N

Th e Xac t ha s demonstrate dmetal s measu r emen t accurac y o n avariet y o f sourc e type s an dwit h a variety o f

differeu t conhols . Thes e source s hav e include dgas fire dan dcoa l firedsource s wit h ES P an dwet

scmbbin g conhols . I n addition, th e Xac t demonshate daccurac y measiuin g mercmy wit h a

t leas t tw o differeu t

approache s t o mercur

y conho l - powde r

activate dcarbo n an d EMO . I n the futur e the accurac y an dprecisio n o f th e Xac t wil l b e teste d o n tw o secondar y lea d smelter s i n th e Lo s Angele s Basi n area . Thes e test s wil l includ e both dynami c spikin g test s wit h areferenc e aeroso l a

s wel l a s comparison s t o stac k

metal s measuremen

t method s suc h a s Metho d 29 . REFERENCE S 1 . El i Lill y an dCo . (2005) , Alternativ e Monitorin g Petitio n fo r the Solid-Liqui dIncinerator , Tippecano e Laboratories , Lafayette , I N 4790 9 2 . Oldham , CB . Ai r

Measurement s an dQuaht y Group , Offic e o f A h Plannin g an d Standards , U.S . Envhonmenta l Protectio n Agency , Researc h Triangl e Park , NC . Writte n commimicatio n with El i Lill y an dCompany : Lafayette , IN . 200 6 3 . U . S . Envhonmenta l Protectio n Agenc y Metho d301 , Fiel dVahdatio n o f Pollutio n Measurement

Method s fo r

Variou s Media , h

aCode of Federal Regulations, 40CFR Part 56. U.S . Government

Printin g Office : Washington , DC , 200 5 4 . "Nationa l Emission s Standard s Fro mCoal

- Oil-fire dElectri c Stea mGeneratin g Unit s an d Standard s o f

Performanc e fo r

Fossil-Fuel-Fire dElectri c Utility , mdustrial-Commercial

Institutiona l Stea

mGeneratin g Units , Fina l Rule. " Federal Register 7 7 (Februar

y 16 , 2012) : 9403-9513 . 5 . "Nationa l Emission s Standard s fo r Hazardou s A h Pollutant s fo r Hazardou s Wast

e Combustor s (Phas e I Fina l Replacemen t Standard s an dPhas e II); " Fina l Rule . Federal Register 70 , No . 19 6 (October

12,2005) : 5940 2 - 59450 ) http://ww.epa . gov/fe ^ Accesse dJul y 24,2014 . 6 . "Standard s o f

Performanc e fo r

Ne w Stationar

y Source s an dErnission s Guideline s fo r Existin g Sources : Hospital/Medical/Infection s Waste Incinerators; " Fina l Rule . Federal Register 74, No. 192 (October

6,2009) . ht1p://ww.^o.gov/f(favs/pkg/FR-2009-10

- 06/pdf/E9-22928.pd f

Accesse dJul y 24 , 2014 . 7 . "Nationa l Emissio n Standard s fo r Hazardou s Ah
- Pollutant s fro mth e Portlan dCement Manufacturin g Industr

y an dStandard s o f

Performanc e fo r

Portlan dCement

Plants; " Fina l Rule . Federal

Register 75, No. 174 (Septembe

r 9,2010) . htb://www.epa.gov/ttn/atw/pcen]/fr09sel0.pd f Accesse dJul y 24,201 4 8 . U.S . Envhonmenta l Protectio n Agency . Metho d29 , Determinatio n o f Metal s Emission s fromStationar

y Sources , h i Code of

Federal Regulations, 40CFR 60; U.S . Government Printin g Office : Washington , DC , 2005 . 1 2

VES01746 09 . "Revise d Standard s fo r Hazardou s Waste Combustors " Propose dRule . Federal Register 61, No. 77

(Apri l 19 , 1996) . hdD://wvw.gpo.gov/fdsvs/pkg/FR-1996-04-19/pdf/96

- 7872.pd f Accesse dJul y 24.2014 . 10 . U.S . Environmenta l Protectio n Agency , Regio n 5 . Ai r Pollutio n Contro l Titl e V Permi t t o Operate . Peimi t

No . V-IL-1716300103-08-01 . htto://www.regulations.gov/#!documentDetail;D=EPA-R05-OAR-2012-0649-000 1 Accesse dJul y 24,2014 . 11 . "Nationa l Emissio n Standard s fo r Hazardou s Ai r

Pollutants : Secondar

y Lea dSmelting " Propose dRule . Federal

Register 76, No. 97

(Ma y 19 , 2011 ) http://ww.epa.gov/ttn/atw/lead2nd/frl9mv l l.pd f Accesse dJul y 24.201 4 12 . Yanca , C.A. ; Barth , D.C ; Petterson , K.A. ; Nakanishi , M.P. ; Cooper , J.A. ; Johnsen , B.E. ; Lambert , R.H. ; Bivins , D.G. ; J. Air and Waste Manage. Assoc. 2006, 56, 1733-1742 . 13 . Rigo , H.G. ; Chandler A.J. ; J. Air

and Waste Mange. Assoc. 1999, 49 , 399-411 . 14 . America n Society o f Mechanica l Engineers , Researc h Comniitte e o n Industria l an d Municipa l Waste . Reference Method Accuracy and

Precision (ReMAP): Phase 1, Precision of

Manual Stack Emission Measurements; Report No . CRTD-60 ; America n Societ y o f

Mechanica l Engineer s International ; Washington , DC , 2001 . 15 . U.S . Envhonmenta l Protectio n Agency . Evaluation of Two Methods for

the Measurement of Mercury Emissions in Exhaust Gases from a Mumcipal Waste Combustor; EP A 450/4

- 92-013 . U.S . Government Printin g Office : Washington , DC , 199 1 16 . U.S . Envhonmenta l Protectio n Agency . Other Tes t Metho d16 , Specification s fo r X-ra y Fluorescenc e Base d Multi-Metal s CEM S a t Stationar

y Sources . htm://www.epa.gov/ttri/emc/prelirn/otml6.pd f Accesse dJul y 24.2014 . 17 . U.S . Envhonmenta l Protectio n Agency . Othe r Tes t Metho d20 . Quaht y Assuranc e Requhement s fo r

X-ra y Fluorescenc e Base dMulti-Metal s CEM S a t Stationar

y Sources , http://www.epa.gov/ttn/emc/preliiri/otm20.pd f Accesse dJul y 24,2014 . 18 . Micromatte r

Co . 400 4 Westbroo k

Mall , Vancouver , B.C . V6 T 2A3 , Canada . 19 . U.S . Envhonmenta l Protectio n Agency . Compendiu mMetho d10-3.3 : Determinatio n o f Metal s i n Ambien t

Particulate Matte r

Usin g X-ra y Fluorescenc e (XRF ) Spectroscopy . I n Compendium of

Methods for

the Determination of

Inorganic Compounds in Ambient Air; EPA/625/R-96/010a . U.S . Government Printin g Office : Washington , DC , 1999 . 20 . U.S . Envhonmenta l Protectio n Agency . Metho d30B . Determinatio n o f Tota l Vapo r Phas e Mercur y Emission s Fro mCoal-Fire dCombustio n Source s Usin g Carbo n Sorben t Traps . I n Code of

Federal Regulations 40CFR 60. U.S . Government Printin g Office . Washington , DC , 21 . Coope r

Environmental Service s LLC . Feasibilit y o f Monitorin g Heav y Meta l Emission s fro maCoa l Fire dHazardou s Wast e Incinerato r

Usin g aMulti-Meta l Continuou s 1 3

VES01746 1Emission s Monitor . EP A Contrac t J D EP-D-07-026 . Apri l 30,2007 . 22 . Th e Avagadr o Grou p LLC , Continuou s X-Ra y Fluorescenc e Mercur y Emission s Monitor , Unofficia l Relativ e Accurac y Tes t Audit , Apri l 28 t h2009 . 

### KEYWORD S Multi-Metal s CEMS , Hazardou s Wast e Incinerators , X-ra y Fluorescenc e

# VES017463-017634.pd fUnite dState s Environmenta l Protectio n Agenc y Regio n 5 Ai r & Radiatio n Divisio n 77 Wes t Jackso n Boulevar d Chicago , Illinoi s 6060

4 

### AI RPOLLUTIO N CONTRO L TITL E V PERMI T T O OPERAT E
Permi t No. : V-IL-1716300103-2014-1 0 Issu e Date : DRAF T Effectiv e Date ; DRAF T Expiratio n Date : DRAF T
I n accordanc e wit

h th e provision s o f

Titl e V ofth e Clean Ai r

Ac t an d 4 0 C.F.R . Par

t 71 , 

### Veoli a ES Technica

l Solutions

, L.L.C . i s authorize d t

o operat e a h emissio n unit s an

d t o conduct othe r air pollutan t emittin g activitie s i n accordanc e wit h th

e permit condition s liste d i n thi s permit . Thi s sourc e i s authorize d t o operat e i n St . Clai r

Count y a t th e followin g address : 7 Mobil e Avenue , Sauget , Illinoi s 6220 1 Term s an d condition s no

t otherwis e define di n thi s permit have th e meaning assigned t

o the mi n 4 0 C.F.R . Par

t 7 1 unles s othe

r regulation s o

r statute s ar

e referenced . Al l terms an d condition s o f th e permit ar e enforceabl e by EP A an d citizen s unde

r th e Clean Ai r

Act . Onc e effective , thi s permit supersede s an

y othe r permit issue d t o th e sourc e pursuan

t t o Titl e V o f the Clean Ai r

Ac t an d 4 0 C.F.R . Par

t 71 . /s / 10/10/1 4 Georg e Czerniak , Directo r Dat e Ai r an d Radiatio n Divisio n U.S . EP A - Regio n 5

VES01746 3Veoli a E S Technica l Solutions , L.L.C . Pag e 2 o f 17 2 Permi tNo. : V-IL-1716300103-2014-1 0 Issuance Date : DRAF T Expiratio n Date : DRAF T 

### TABL E O F CONTENT S 1.0 . SOURC E IDENTIFICATIO N AN D UNIT-SPECIFI C INFORMATIO N 8 1.1 . GENERA L SOURC E INFORMATIO N 8 1.2 . FACILIT Y DESCRIPTIO N 8 1.3 . EMISSIO N UNIT S 8 2.0 . UNIT-SPECIFI C OPERATIN G REQUIREMENT S 1 1 2.1 . HAZARDOU S WAST E COMBUSTORS , UNIT S 2 , 3 AN D 4 1 1 (A ) Emissio n Limitation s an dStandard s 1 1 (B ) Nonapplicabl e Regulation s 1 4 (C ) Wor

k Practic e an

dOperationa

l Requirement s 1 5 (D ) Monitorin g an

dTestin g 3 1 (E ) Recordkeepin g an

dReportin g 7 3 2.2 . MATERIA L PROCESSIN G AREA S 9 0 (A ) Emissio n Limitation s an dStandard s 9 0 (B ) Nonapplicabl e Regulation s 9 1 (C ) Work

Practic e an

dOperationa

l Requirement s 9 2 (D ) Monitorin g an

dTestin g 9 4 (E ) Recordkeepin g an

dReportin g 9 9 2.3 . DRU M CRUSHE R9 9 (A ) Emissio n Limitation s an dStandard s 10 0 (B ) Nonapplicabl e Regulation s 10 0 (C ) Wor

k Practic e an

dOperationa

l Requirement s 10 0 (D ) Monitonn g andTestin g 10 0 (E ) Recordkeepin g an

dReportin g 10 1 2.4 . LIQUI D WAST E STORAG E TANK S 10 2 (A ) Emissio n Limitation s an dStandard s 102 (B ) Nonapplicabl e Regulation s 10 4 (C ) Wor k Practic e andOperationa

l Requirement s 10 5

VES01746 4Veoli a E S Technica l Solutions , L.L.C . Pag e 3 o f 17 2 Permi tNo. : V-IL-1716300103-2014-1 0 Issuance Date : DRAF T Expiratio n Date : DRAF T (D ) Monitorin g an

dTestin g 10 5 (E ) Recordkeeping andReportin g 106 2.5 . BUL K

SOLI D WAST E STORAG E FACILITY'... ! 10 9 (A ) Emissio n Limitation s andStandard s 10 9 (B ) Nonapplicabl e Regulation s 11 1 (C ) Wor

k Practic e an

dOperationa

l Requirement s 11 2 (D ) Monitorin g an

dTestin g 11 2 (E ) Recordkeeping an

dReportin g ; 11 4 2.6 . GASOLIN E STORAG E TAN K 11 7 (A ) Emissio n Limitation s an dStandard s 11 7 (B ) Nonapplicabl e Regulation s 11 8 (C ) Wor

k Practic e an

dOperational Requirement s 11 8 (D ) Monitorin g an

dTestin g 11 9 (E ) Recordkeeping an dReportin g 11 9 2.7 . BOILE R, 12 0 (A ) Emissio n Limitation s an dStandard s 12 0 (B ) Nonapplicabl e Regulation s 12 1 (C ) Wor

k Practic e an

dOperationa

l Requirement s 12 2 (D ) Monitorin g an

dTestin g 12 3 (E ) Recordkeeping andReportin g 12 4 2.8 . EMERGENC Y GENERATOR S 12 6 (A ) Emissio n Limitation s andStandard s 126 (B ) Nonapplicabl e Regulations . 126 (C ) Wor

k Practic e andOperational Requirement s 126 (D ) Monitorin g an

dTestin g 13 0 (E ) Recordkeeping an

dReportin g 13 0 2.9 . FUGITIV E EMISSION S 13 3 (A ) Emissio n Limitation s an dStandard s 13 3 (B ) Nonapplicabl e Regulation s 134

VES01746 5Veoli a E S Technica l Solutions , L.L.C . Page 4 o f 17 2 Permi tNo. : V-IL-1716300103-2014-1 0 Issuance Date : DRAF T Expiratio n Date : DRAF T (C ) Wor

k Practic e an

dOperationa

l Requirements 13 4 (D ) Monitorin g an

dTestin g '. 14 3 (E ) Recordkeepin g an

dReporting... . 14 6 2.10 . INSIGNIFICAN T EMISSIO N UNIT S AN D ACTIVITIE S 14 8 (A ) Lis t o f Insignifican t

Emissio n Unit s an

dActivitie s 14 8 (B ) Applicabl e Requirement s 149 (C ) Complianc e with Applicabl e Requirement s 149 3.0. FACILITY-WID E PERMI T REQUIREMENT S 15 0 3.1 . GENERA L PAR T 7 1 RECORDKEEPIN G 15 0 (A ) Require dRecord s 15 0 (B ) RecordRetentio n Schedule 15 0 (C ) Emission s Calculatio n Methodolog y 15 0 3.2 . GENERA L PAR T 7 1 REPORTIN G 15 1 (A ) Semi-annua

l Report s 15 1 (B ) Deviation s • 15 2 3.3 . PERFORMANC E TESTIN G 15 3 3.4 . FACILITY-WID E APPLICABL E REQUIREMENT S 15 4 (A ) Fugitiv e Particulat

e Matter Restriction s 15 4 (B ) Ope n Burnin g Prohibition s 15 4 (C ) Visibl e Emission s 154 (D ) Recyclin g andEmission s Reductio n 15 4 (E ) Ris k

Managemen

t Plan (RMP ) . • 15 5 (F ) Episode Actio n Plan s 15 5 (G) Annua l Benzene Wast e Quantit y Determinatio n 15 5 (H ) Genera

l Prohibitio n on Ai r

Pollutio n 15 6 (I ) Facility-wid e Testin g 15 6 (J ) Facility-wid e Recordkeepin g 16 0

VES01746 6Veoli a E S Technica l Solutions , L.L.C . Pag e 5 o f 17 2 Permi tNo. : V-IL-1716300103-2014-1 0 Issuanc e Date : DRAF T Expiratio n Date : DRAF T 4 .0 . GENERA L PAR T 7 1 REQUIREMENT S 16 3 4.1 . DEFINITION S 163 4.2 . ANNUA L FE E PAYMEN T 163 4.3 . COMPLIANC E STATEMEN T 16 5 4.4 . COMPLIANC E CERTIFICATION S 16 5 4.5 . SCHEDUL E O FCOMPLIANC E 16 6 4.6 . DUT Y T O PROVID E AN D SUPPLEMEN T INFORMATIO N 16 6 4.7 . ENFORCEABILIT Y 16 7 4.8 . SUBMISSION S 16 7 4.9 . SEVERABILIT Y CLAUS E 16 7 4.10 . PERMI T ACTION S 167 4.11 . ADMINISTRATIV E PERMI T AMENDMENT S 16 8 4.12 . MINO RPERMI T MODIFICATION S 16 8 4.13 . SIGNIFICAN T PERMI T MODIFICATION S 16 8 4.14 . REOPENIN G FO RCAUS E 16 8 4.15 . PROPERT Y RIGHT S 16 8 4.16 . INSPECTIO N AN D ENTR Y 16 8 4.17 . EMERGENC Y PROVISION S 16 9 4.18 . OF FPERMI T CHANGE S 17 0 4.19 . PERMI T EXPIRATIO N AN D RENEWA L 17 0 4.20 . OPERATIONA L FLEXIBILIT Y 17 1 4.21 . PERMI T SHIEL D 17 1 4.22 . CREDIBL E EVIDENC E 17 2

VES01746 7Veoli a E S Technica l Solutions , L.L.C . Pag e 6 o f 17 2 Permi tNo. : V-IL-1716300103-2014-1 0 Issuance Date : DRAiF T ExpirationDate : DRAF T Abbreviation s an dAcronym s AST M America n Societ y fo r Testin g andMaterial s C A A o r Ac t Clea

n Ai r Ac t [4 2 U.S.C . § 740 1 e

t seq. ] C E M Continuou s Emissio n Monito r CEM S Continuou s Emission s Monitorin g Syste m C.F.R . Code o f Federa l Regulation s CM S Continuou s Monitorin g Syste m C O Carbo n Monoxid e C O M Continuou s Opacity Monito r CPM S Continuou s Parametri c Monitorin g Syste m DO C Documentatio n o f Complianc e DR E Destructio n andremoval efficienc y EP A Unite dState s Environmental Protectio n Agenc y ES V Emergenc y Safet y Ven t E U Emissio n Uni t Facilit y Veoli aE S Technica l Solutions , L.L.C . ga l gallo n g gram s gr/sc f grain s pe r standar d cubi c foo t

o f exhaust ga s HA P Hazardou s Ai r Pollutant h r hou

r HW C hazardou s wast e combusto

r IA C Illinoi s Administrativ e Code IEP A Illinoi s Environmental Protectio n Agenc y k g kilogram kp akil o pascal s l b pound L V M Lo w Volatil e Metal s (Arsenic , Chromiu man dBeryllium ) MAC T Maximu mAchievabl e Contro l Technolog y pg/dsc mmicrogram s pe r dr y standar d cubi c mete

r o f exhaust ga s M g megagra m MMBt u millio n Britis h Therma l Unit s NESHA P Nationa l Emissio n Standard s fo r Hazardou s Ai r

Pollutant s n g TEQ/dsc mnanograms toxicity equivalent s pe r dr y standar d cubi c mete

r o f exhaust ga s NO C Notificatio n o f Complianc e NO x Nitroge n Oxide s NSP S Ne w Sourc e Performanc e Standar d NS RNe w Sourc e Revie w Operator Veoli aE S Technica l Solutions , L.L.C . Permitte e Veoli aE S Technica l Solutions , L.L.C . P M Particulat e Matter PMi o Particulat e matte r les s tha n 1 0 micron s in diamete

r pp mpart s pe r millio n

VES01746 8Veoli a E S Technica l Solutions , L.L.C . Page 7 o f 17 2 Permi tNo. : V-IL-1716300103-2014-1 0 Issuanc e Date : DRAF T Expiratio n Date : DRAF T POH C principl e organi c hazardou s constituen t PS D Preventio n o f S ignifican t

Deterioratio n Ps i Pound s pe r squar e inc h SO 2 Sulfu r Dioxid e SV M Semivolatil e Metal s (Leadan dCadmium) tp y ton s pe r yea r VO C Volatil e Organi c Compound s VHA P Volatil e Hazardou s Ai r Pollutant

VES01746 9Veoli a E S Technica l Solutions , L.L.C . Pag e 8 o f 17 2 Permi tNo. : V-IL-1716300103-2014-1 0 Issuance Date : DRAF T Expiratio n Date : DRAF T 

### 1.0 . SOURC E IDENTIFICATIO N AN D UNIT-SPECIFI C INFORMATIO N 1.1. GENERA L SOURC E INFORMATIO N Paren t Company : Facility : County : SI C Code : AF S Plan t Identificatio n Number : Veoli aE S Technica l Solutions , L.L.C . 70 0 E . Butterfiel dRoa d Lombard , Illinoi s 6014 8 Veoli aE S Technical Solutions , L.L.C . 7 Mobil e Avenu e Sauget , Illinoi s 6220 1 . St . Clai r 495 3 171630010 3 1.2 . FACILIT Y DESCRIPTIO N Veoli aE S Technical Solutions , L.L.C . i s atreatment, storage , an ddisposa l facility , whic h accepts offsit e wast

e fo r further disposal through incineration . Container s andbulk shipments o f

hazardou s an

dsoli dwaste s ar

e received , analyzed , transferre dt o temporar

y storage facilities , processed , an dincinerate di n on

e o f thre e combustio n units . 1.3. EMISSIO N UNIT S The emission s unit s locate da t th e facilit y a

t th e tim e o f permi t issuanc e are : 1 missio n 1 m t M.tnut.Htmt' i Ih'M'imtiti

n Moik l l>.iu . n i ( iiiistriiilio n Emissio n Control Equipmen

t
Hazardou s Wast e Combustor s Incineratio n Unit # 2 (Incinerator

) with a Maximu mHea

t Capacit y o f 1 6 mmBtu/h

r Trad

e Wast e Incineration , TWI

2000 , Serie s 2 Octobe r 198 6 Joy-Nir o Spray

Dryer Absorbe r (SDA-2) , Puls e Fl o Fabri c Filte r

(BH-2 )

VES01747 0Veoli a E S Technica l Solutions , L.L.C . Pag e 9 o f 17 2 Permi tNo. : V-IL-1716300103-2014-1 0 Issuance Date - DRAF T ExpirationDate : DRAF T rniisMui i 1 m l M.iiiiitacliiKi Descriptio

n Modi l l>.i k o f Constructio

n Emissio

n Contro l Equipmen

t Incineratio n Uni t

# 3 (Incinerator

) with a Maximu mHea

t Capacit y o f 1 6 mmBtu/h

r Tidd

c \ \jsto Incineration , TWI

2000 , Serie s 2 No \embe r 198 7 .li>\-Niu

> Spra y Dryer Absorbe r (SDA-3) , Puls e Fl o Fabri c Filte r

(BH-3 ) Incineratio n Uni t

# 4 (Rotar y Kiln ) with a Maximu mHea

t Capacit y o f 5 0 mmBtu/h

r Internationa

l Wast e Energy , PY*RO X Jun e 198 8 Temperin g

Chamber , Activate d Carbo n Injection , Spra y Drye r Absorber , Fabri c Filte r Materia l Processin g Area s Wast

e Processin g Unit s (Are a1 an

d Are a2 ) 198 8 Non e Materia l Processin g Area s Lab Pac k

Repac k Uni t 198 8 Non e Dru m Crushe r Empt

y drums ar

e crushed 198 4 Non e

Storag e Tank s fo r Liqui d Waste s Tank s #

2 (4,39 1 gals) , # 4 (4,93 1 gals) , # 6 (7,200 gals) , #

8 (5,820 gals) , #1 0 (12,86 9 gals) , #2

0 (12,86 9 gals) , #30 (12,86 9 gals) , #4

0 (12,86 9 gals) , #5

0 (12,86 9 gals) , #6

0 (12,86 9 gals) , #30

0 (19,85 0 gals) , #30

2 (30,000 gals) , #30

4 (30,000 gals) , #30

6 (30,000 gals) , #30

8 (30,000 gals) , #31 0 (30,000 gals) , #31 2 (10,000 gals ) an

d #314(10,00 0 gals ) Moder n Weldin g Apri l 200 2 fo r

# 2 and#4 ; Jun

e 2004 fo r #1 0 an d #20 ; Marc h 200 9 fo r #30 ; 198 8 forth e others . Activate dCarbo n

Absorptio n System s on eac h storag e tan

k vent .

Storag e Tank s fo r Liqui d Waste s

Storage tan k fo r # 2 fue l oil : Tan

k #39 0 (30,000 gals ) Moder n Weldin g 198 8 Non e Bul k Soli d Wast e Temporar

y storage o f bulk soli dwaste s i n pit s prio r t o bein g fe d 198 8 Cyclone , Airto l Baghous e (B F Bldg

BH-1) , Carbo n

VES01747 1Veoli a E S Technica l Solutions , L.L.C . Pag e 1 0 o f 17 2 Permi tNo. : V-IL-1716300103-2014-1 0 Issuance Date : DRAF T ExpirationDate : DRAF T Emissio n I ni l Desciipliuii M .lllllt.Klllll- l MoiK I Dat

e of ( mist i lu-tio n 1 missio

n ( mitro l Equipmen

t Storag e Facilit y t

o Incineratio n Uni t # 4 Adsorptio n Uni t (B F Bldg-CA ) Gasolin e Storag e Tan

k 55 0 gallo n tank, equippe dwith submerged loadin g pip e Jun e 201 2 Non e

Boile r Natural Gas-Fire d

Boile r with a Maximu mHea

t Capacit y o f 10. 6 mmBtu/h

r (Boile r #1 ) Cleave r Brooks , 25 0 November

199 5 Non e

Emergenc y Generators (2) Tw o #

2 Fue l oil-fire d Emergenc y Generator s eac

h with Maximu mHea

t Capacit y o f 0.40 mmBtu/h

r (<11 2 kilowatt s (kW) ) 198 8 Non e

Fugitiv e Emission s Pumps , Valves ,

Open-En dLine s an

d Compressor s N/ A Non e

VES01747 2Veoli a E S Technica l Solutions , L.L.C . Pag e 1 1 o f 17 2 Permi tNo. : V-IL-1716300103-2014-1 0 Issuanc e Date : DRAF T ExpirationDate : DRAF T 

### 2.0 . UNIT-SPECIFI C OPERATIN G REQUIREMENT S 2.1 . HAZARDOU S WAST E COMBUSTORS , UNIT S 2, 3 AN D 4 (A ) Emissio n Limitation s an d Standard s [4 0 C.F.R . § 71.6(a)(1) ] Th e Permittee shal l compl y with th e followin g requirement s a t eac h individua l incinerator

unles s specifie dotherwise : 1 . Visibl e Emissio n Limitations . (a ) Th e Permittee shal l no t caus e o r allo w fro many emissio n sourc e th e emissio n int

o th e atmospher

e o f smok e or othe r particulat

e matte r wit h a n opacit y greate r tha n 3 0 percent , excep

t a s allowe db y 3 5 IA C 212.123(b ) an d 212.124 . [3 5 IA C 212.123(a) ] (b ) Th e Permittee shal l not caus e o r allo w fro man

y process , includin g an

y materia l handlin g o

r storage activity , th

e emissio n o f

fugitiv e particulat

e matte r tha t i s visibl e b y a

n observe r lookin g generall y overhea d a t apoint beyondth e propert y lin e o f th e sourc e unles s th

e windspee

d i s greate

r tha n 40. 2 kilometer s pe

r hou r (25 mile s pe

r hour) . [3 5 IA C 212.30 1 an d 212.314 ] 2 . Sulfu r

Dioxid e Limitations . Tota l sulfu r

dioxid e emission s fro mth e facilit y shal l no

t exceed 7. 7 ton s pe

r yea r (tpy ) fro mUnit

2 , 7. 7 tp y fro mUni t

3 , an d 50.7 6 tp y fro mUnit

4 . [Constructio n Permit s 8710002

4 an d 88010001 ] 3 . Carbo n Monoxid e Limitations . (a ) Th e Permittee shal l no t allo w emission s o f

carbo n monoxide i n exces s o f 10 0 part s pe r millio n (ppm

) b y volume , o n a

n hourl y rollin g average (monitore d continuousl y with acontinuou s emission s monitorin g system) , dr y basi s an d correcte d t

o 7 . percen

t oxygen . Th e Permittee must als o documen t that , durin g th

e destructio n and removal efficienc y test run s o r their equivalen

t a s provide dby 4

0 C.F.R . § 63.1206(b)(7) , hydrocarbon s do not exceed 1 0 pp

mb y volum e durin g thos e runs , o n a n hourl y rollin g average (monitore d continuousl y with acontinuou s emission s monitorin g system) , dr

y basis , correcte d t

o 7 percen

t oxygen , an

d reported a

s propane , [4 0 C.F.R . §63.1219(a)(5) ] (b ) The Permittee shal l no t allo w emission s o f

carbo n monoxide fro man y incinerator

i n exces s o f

50 0 ppmcorrecte d t

o 5 0 percen

t exces s air . [3 5 IA C 216.141 , Constructio n Permit s 83120053 , 8710002 4 an d 88010001 ]

VES01747 3Veoli a E S Technica l Solutions , L.L.C . Pag e 1 2 o f 17 2 Permi tNo. : V-IL-1716300103-2014-1 0 Issuanc e Date : DRAF T ExpirationDate : DRAF T

(c ) The Permittee shal l not allo w emission s o f

carbo n monoxide i n exces s o f 6. 6 tp y fro mUni t

2 , 6. 6 tp y fro mUni t

3 an d13.8 6 tp y fro mUni t

4 . [Constructio n Permit s 8710002 4 an d88010001 ] 4 . Particulat

e Matte r Limitations . (a ) The Permittee shal l no t caus e o r allo w th e emissio n o f

particulat

e matte r int o th e atmospher

e fro man y incinerato r

burnin g mor

e tha n 0.907 megagra mpe r hou r (Mg/hr ; 2,00 0 pound s pe r hou r (lb/hr) ) bu

t les s tha n 27. 2 Mg/h r

(60,000 lb/hr) o f

refus e t o excee d18 3 milligram s pe r standar d cubi c mete

r (mg/scm ; 0.0 8 grai n pe

r standar dcubi c foo t

(gr/scf) ) o f effluen t gase s correcte dt

o 1 2 percen

t carbo n dioxide . [3 5 IA C 212.181(b) , Constructio n Permi t

83120053 ] (b ) Th e Permittee shal l not allo w emission s o f

particulat e matte r fro mth e facilit y i n exces s o f

0.01 3 gr/dscf

, correcte dto 7 percen

t oxygen . [4 0 C.F.R . §63.1219(a)(7) ] (c ) Th e Permittee shal l not

allo w emission s o f

total suspende

dparticulat

e matte r fro mth e facilit y i n exces s o f

15. 0 tp y fro mUnit

2 , 15. 0 tp y fro m Unit 3 , an d16.9 2 tp y fro mUni t

4 . [Constructio n Permit s 8710002 4 and 88010001 ] 5 . Volatil e Organi c Compound s Limitations . (a ) The Permittee shal l no t caus e o r allo w th e discharg e o f

mor e tha n 3. 6 kg/h

r ( 8 lbs/hr ) o f organi c material into th

e atmospher

e fro man y emissio n unit , excep t that, i f no odo r nuisanc e exists , thi s limitatio n shal l apply onl y t o photochemicall y reactiv e material . Alternatively , th e Permittee ma

y us e a contro l devic e t

o reduc e suc h emission s eithe r t o 1 0 ppmequivalen

t methan e (molecula

r weight 16 ) o r less , or t o conver t 8 5 percen t o f th e hydrocarbon s t

o carbo n dioxid e an

dwater . [3 5 IA C 219.301 , 219.302 ] (b ) Organi c materia

l emission s fro mth

e facilit y shal l not

exceed0. 9 tpy fro m Unit 2 , 0. 9 tp y fro mUni t

3 , an d3. 1 tp y fro mUnit

4 . [Constructio n Permit s 8710002 4 an d88010001 ] 6 . Nitroge n Oxid e Limitations . Nitroge n oxide emission s fro mth e facilit y shal l no t

exceed4. 0 tp y fro mUni t 2 , 4. 0 tp y fro mUnit

3 , an d61. 6 tp y fro mUni t

4 . [Constructio n Permit s 8710002 4 an d88010001 ] 7 . Hazardou s Ai r

Pollutant Limitations .

VES01747 4Veoli a E S Technica l Solutions , L.L.C . Pag e 1 3 o f 17 2 Permi tNo. : V-IL-1716300103-2014-1 0 Issuance Date : DKA;P T ExpirationDate : DRAF T

(a ) Th e Permittee shal l not allo w emission s o f

dioxin s and furan s fromth e facilit y i n exces s o f

0.2 0 nanograms toxicit y equivalent s pe r dr y standar d cubi c mete

r (ng TEQ/dscm) , correcte d t o 7 percen

t oxygen . [40 C.F.R . § 63.1219(a)(1) ] (b ) Th e Permittee shal l no t

allo w emission s o f

mercur y fro mth e facilit y i n exces s o f 13 0 microgram s pe

r dr y standar d cubi c mete

r (ug/dscm) , corrected t

o 7 percen

t oxygen . [4

0 C.F.R . § 63.1219(a)(2) ] (c ) The Permittee shal l no t allo w combine d emission s o f cadmiuman

d lea d fro mth e facilit y i n exces s o f

23 0 ug/dscm , correcte d to 7 percen t oxygen . [4 0 C.F.R . § 63.1219(a)(3) ] (d ) Th e Permittee shal l no t

allo w combine d emission s o f arsenic , beryllium , an d chromiu mfro mth

e facilit y i n exces s o f

9 2 ug/dscm , correcte d t

o 7 percen t oxygen . [40 C.F.R . § 63.1219(a)(4) ] (e ) The Permittee shal l design , install , operate , an d maintai n atreatmen

t proces s tha

t destroy s benzen

e i n th e wast e strea mb y incineratin g th

e wast e i n acombustio n uni t

tha t achieve s adestructio n efficienc y o f 99 percen

t o r greate r fo r benzene . [4

0 C.F.R . § 61.348(a)(l)(iii) ] (f ) Al l joint s o

r seam s betwee n th e pip e section s o f

an y transfe r syste mtha t consist s o f

continuou s hard-pipin g shal l b e permanentl

y o r semi

permanentl

y seale d (e.g. , awelde djoin t betwee n tw o section s o f

meta l pip e o r abolte d an

d gasketed flange). [4

0 C.F.R . § 63.689(c)(2) ] 8 . Hydrogen Chlorid e Limitations . (a ) The Permittee shal l no t allo w combine demission s o f hydroge n chlorid e an d chlorin e ga

s (tota l chlorine ) fromth

e facilit y i n exces s o f

3 2 ppmb y volume , expressed a

s achlorid e (Cl
- ) equivalent , dr y basi s an d correcte d t

o 7 percen t oxygen . [40 C.F.R . § 63.1219(a)(6) ] (b ) Th e Permittee shal l no t

allo w hydrogen chlorid e emission s i n exces s o f 4. 0 pound s pe

r hou r (lbs/hr ) fro meithe

r Uni t 2 o r Unit 3 o r th e contro l device s shal l demonstrat

e aminimu mhydrogen chlorid e removal efficienc y o f 99 percent . [Constructio n Permit s 8312005 3 an d 87100024 ] 9 . Destructio n an

d Remova

l Efficienc y (DRE ) Standard . (a ) Unit s 2 , 3 an

d 4 must eac h achiev e aDR E o f

99.9 9 percen

t fo r each principl e organi c hazardou s constituen t (POHC ) specifie dunde

r conditio n 2.1(A)(9)(c)(ii) , below . Th e Permittee shal l calculat e th e DR E fo r

eac h POH C usin g th

e followin g equation :

VES01747 5Veoli a E S Technica l Solutions , L.L.C . Pag e 1 4 o f 17 2 Permi tNo. : V-IL-1716300103-2014-1 0 Issuanc e Date : DRAF T Expiratio n Date : DRAF T

DR E = [1-( WOUT/WIN) ] X 100 % Where : WI N = mas s feedrat e o f on e POH C i n awast

e feedstream ; an

d WOU T = mas s emissio n rat e o f th e sam e POH C presen

t i n exhaus t emission s prio r

t o releas e t

o th e atmosphere . The Permittee must

performintermediat

e calculation s usin g a

t least three significan t

figures , bu

t ma y roundth

e resultan t emissio n level s t

o tw o significan t

figure s t o documen

t compliance . [4 0 C.F.R . § 63.1219(c)(1 ) an d (d) ] (b ) Fo r dioxin-liste dhazardou s waste s F020 , F021, F022 , F023 , F026 , o r F02 7 (see 4 0 C.F.R . § 261.31) , Unit s 2 , 3 an d 4 mus t eac h achieve aDR E o f 99.999 9 percen

t fo r eac h POH C specifie dunde r conditio n 2.1(A)(9)(c)(ii) , below . The Permitte e mus t demonstrat

e thi s DR E performanc e on POHC s tha t ar e mor e difficul t

t o incinerat

e tha n tetra- , penta- , an

d hexachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin s and dibenzofurans . Th e Permittee must us e th e equation i n conditio n 2.1(A)(9)(a) , above , to calculat e DR E fo r

eac h POHC . I n addition , th e Permitte e must notif y th e Administrato r

o f it s inten t t o incinerat

e hazardou s waste s F020 , F021, F022 , F023 , F026 , o r F027 . [4 0 C.F.R . § 63.1219(c)(2) ] (c ) Principa l organi c hazardou s constituents [4 0 C.F.R . § 63.1219(c)(3) ] (i ) Th e Permitte e mus t

trea t th e POHC s i n th

e wast e fee dtha

t th e Permittee specifie s unde

r conditio n 2.1(A)(9)(c)(ii) , below , t o th e exten t require db y 4 0 C.F.R . § 63.1219(c)(1 ) an d (c)(2) . (ii ) Th e Permitte e mus t

specif y on e o r mor e POHC s tha

t ar e representative o f

th e most difficul t t o destroy organi c compound s i n th e hazardou s wast

e feedstream . The Permitte e must base thi s specificatio n o n th

e degre e o f difficult y o f

incineratio n ofth e organi c constituents i n th

e wast e an d on their concentratio n o

r mas s i n th

e wast e feed , considerin g th

e result s o f

wast e analyse s o

r othe r dat a an d information . (B) Nonapplicabl

e Regulation

s [4 0 C.F.R . § 71.6(f)(1)

] 1 . Unit s 2 , 3 an

d 4 ar e no t subjec t t o 4 0 C.F.R . Par

t 64 , Complianc e Assuranc e Monitorin g (CAM ) fo r

Majo r Stationar y Sources , because :

VES01747 6Veoli a E S Technica l Solutions , L.L.C . Pag e 1 5 o f 17 2 Permi tNo. : V-IL-1716300103-2014-1 0 Issuance Date : DRAF T Expiratio n Date : DRAF T

(a ) The affecte d unit s ar

e require d t

o compl y wit

h aNESHA P propose d afte r Novembe r 15 , 1990 . Emissio n limitation s o r standard s proposed b y th e Administrato r

afte r November

15 , 1990 pursuan

t t o sectio n 11 1 or

11 2 o f th e Ac t ar e exemp t fro mCAM . [4

0 C.F.R . § 64.2(b)(l)(i) ] 2 . Unit s 2 , 3 an

d 4 ar e no t subject t o 3 5 IA C Par

t 22 9 ofth e Illinoi s Stat

e Implementation Plan (SIP) , "Hospita l Medica l Infectiou s Wast e Incinerators, " because th

e Permittee i s prohibite d fro macceptin g or processin g hospital medica l infectiou s wast

e a t th e facility . [3 5 IA C 229.110 ] (C ) Wor k Practic e an d Operationa

l Requirement

s [4 0 C.F.R . § 71.6(a)(1)

] 1 . The Permittee shal l no t bur n hospita l medical infectiou s waste , municipa l waste , o r wast e tha t i s subject t o th e Berylliu mNESHAP . [4 2 U.S.C . § 7661c(a) ] 2 . The Permittee must

operat e Unit s 2 , 3 an

d 4 i n complianc e with th e followin g operating paramete

r limit s (OPLs) . Th e Permitte e must als o compl y with th

e OPL s contained i n th

e Notificatio n o f

Complianc e (NOC ) require d pursuan t t o conditio n 2.1(E)(2) , below . I f an y OP L containe d i n thi s conditio n 2.1(C)(2 ) diffe r fro mth e correspondin g OP L containe d i n th e Permittee' s mos t

recen t NOC , th e Permittee ma

y submit a n applicatio n requesting arevisio n to th e OPL s i n thi s permit , pursuan

t t o 4 0 C.F.R . § 71.7(e)(1) . Nothin g i n thi s permit obligate s th

e Administrato r

t o approve a

n applicatio n t

o revis e OPL s i n thi s permit .
0|ii'i.itiii! > I'sii.iHifli t OP I A\eraging 0|ii'i.itiii! > I'sii.iHifli t I m l 

### n 1 m

i 3 Uni

t# 4 Pc

i io d Minimu mprimar

y combustio n chambe

r temperatur

e (4 0 C.F.R . § 63.1209(j)(l),(k)(2) ) 1,70 9 ° F 1,70

9 ° F 1,56 1 ° F hourl y rollin g average Minimu msecondar

y combustio n chambe

r temperatur

e (40 C.F.R . § 63.1209(i)(l) , (k)(2) ) 1,88 5 ° F 1,850 ° F 1,88 1 ° F hourl y rollin g average Maximu mflu e ga

s flowrate o

r productio n rat e (4 0 C.F.R . § 63.12090(2)) , (k)(3) , (m)(2) , (n)(5) , (o)(2) ) 15,31 0 acf/mi n 15,31 0 acf/mi n 37,39 3 acf/mi n hourl y rollin g average

Maximu mhazardou s wast e pumpabl

e feedrat e rat e fo r eac h 3,10

7 lbs/h r 3,10

7 lbs/h r 3,31 2 lbs/h

r fo r PC C an d 1,20 3 lbs/h r fo r SC C hourl y rollin g average

VES01747 7Veoli a E S Technica l Solutions , L.L.C . Page 1 6 o f 17 2 Permi tNo. : V-IL-1716300103-2014-1 0 Issuanc e Date : DRAF T ExpirationDate : DRAF T Operatin g Wramye r • . • .^Averagin

g Operatin g Wramye r l ni

l 12 I nil - 3 L i t4 4 combustio n chambe

r (40 C.F.R . § 63.1209(0(3) , (k)(4) ) Maximu mhazardou s wast e tota l feedrat e rat e fo r each combustio n chambe r (4 0 C.F.R . § 63.1209(0(3) , (k)(4) ) 4,01 7 lbs/h r 4,01 7 lbs/h

r 10,63 2 lbs/h

r fo r PC C an d 1,20 3 lbs/h r fo r SC C hourl y rollin g

averag e Operatio n o f

wast e firin g syste

mfo r eac h locatio n wher

e wast e i s fe dt o th e incinerato

r (40 C.F.R . § 63.12090(4) ) Minimu m wast e atomizatio n pressur e follo w BT U wast e - 1 5 ps i Minimu m

wast e atomizatio n pressur e fo r lo w BT U wast e -1 5 ps i Minimu m

wast e atomizatio n pressur e fo r lo w BT U wast e - 1 5 ps i Instantaneou s

Maximu mtemperatur

e o f th e ga s a t th e inle t t o adr y particulat

e matte r contro l devic e (i.e. , baghous e inlet

) (4 0 C.F.R . § 63.1209(k)(l)) , (n)(D ) 420 ° F 420 ° F 39 9 ° F hourl y rollin g averag e

Minimu mcarbon injectio n rat

e (4 0 C.F.R . § 63.1209(k)(6)(i) ) N/ A N/ A 6. 2 lbs/h r hourl y rollin g averag e Minimu mcarrie

r flui d (ga s o r liquid ) flowrate or pressur e dro p fo r activate dcarbo

n injectio n syste

m (40 C.F.R . § 63.1209(k)(6)(ii) ) N/ A N/ A 3.1 0 gal/lb Cl 2 hourl y rollin g averag e

Th e bran d(i.e. , manufacturer

) an dtype o f carbo n use

ddurin g th e comprehensive . performanc e tes

t (40 C.F.R . § 63.1209(k)(6)(iii) ) N/ A N/ A NORI T America s Inc . DARCO ® FG L

VES01747 8Veoli a E S Technica l Solutions , L.L.C . Pag e 1 7 o f 17 2 Permi tNo. : V-IL-1716300103-2014-1 0 Issuance Date - DRAF T ExpirationDate : DRAF T Operatin g Pa i .imttL i Averagin g ' k Perio d ' \ Operatin g Pa i .imttL i i ni

t- -fi-'{. : B '

I-mt ^ V Averagin g ' k Perio d ' \ Maximu mtota

l feedrat e o f mercur y (4 0 C F R § 63.1209(l)(l)(i) ) 0.002 1 lbs/h r 0.002 1 lbs/h

r 0.040 lbs/h

r 12-hou

r rollin g average Maximu mas

h feedrat e (40 C.F.R . § 63.1209(m)(3) ) 503 lbs/h r 503 lbs/h

r 4,77 7 lbs/h

r 12-hou

r rollin g average Maximu mtota

l feedrat e o f semivolatil e metal s (40 C.F.R . § 63.1209(n)(2)(ii) ) 6 2 lbs/h r 62 lbs/h

r 62 lbs/h

r 12-hou

r rollin g averag e Maximu mtota

l feedrat e o f lo w volatil e metal s (40 C.F.R . § 63.1209(n)(2)(ii) ) 46 lbs/h r 4 6 lbs/h

r 4 6 lbs/h

r 12-hou

r rollin g average Feedrat e limit s fo r

lo w volatil e metal s i n pumpable feedstreams (4 0 C.F.R . § 63.1209(n)(2)(vii) ) 46 lbs/h r 4 6 lbs/h

r 4 6 lbs/h

r 12-hou

r rollin g averag e Feedrat e o f tota l chlorin e an

dchlorid e i n al l feedstreams (4 0 C.F.R . § 63.1209(n)(4) , (o)(l) ) 20 4 lbs/h r 20

4 lbs/h r 20 3 lbs/h

r 12-hou

r rollin g averag e Minimu msorben

t feedrat e (4 0 C.F.R . § 63.1209(o)(4)(i) ) 2.2 4 lb/l b Cl 2 2.2

4 lb/l b Cl 2 2.1 3 lb/l b C h hourl y rollin g average Minimu mcarrie

r flui d flowrate o

r nozzl e pressur e dro p fo r th e spra y dr y adsorbe r (4 0 C.F.R . § 63.1209(o)(4)(ii) ) 1.9 0 gal/lb C h 1.9

0 gal/lb C h 3.1 0 gal/lb C h hourl y rollin g averag e

Th e brand(z'.e. , manufacturer

) an dtyp e o f sorben t use ddurin g th e comprehensive performanc e tes

t (4 0 C.F.R . § 63.1209 (o)(4)(iii)(A) ) Mississipp i Lim e Compan y Hydrate dLim e Code MR20 0 Mississipp i

Lim e Compan y Hydrate dLim e Code MR20 0 Mississipp i

Lim e Compan y Hydrate dLim e CodeMR20 0

VES01747 9Veoli a E S Technica l Solutions , L.L.C . Pag e 1 8 o f 17 2 Permi tNo. : V-IL-1716300103-2014-1 0 Issuance Date . DRAF T ExpirationDate : DRAF T Operatiii! ! Piir.imclc

i i^ilfeilliliJil

w Perio d Operatiii! ! Piir.imclc

i luf f 2 Uni

t# 3 1 m

l -* 4 Perio

d Maximu mcombustio n chambe r pressur e (4 0 C.F.R . § 63.1209(p) ) -0.0 1 inc h H2 O -0.0 1 inchFfc O -0.0 1 inchHb O 5 second s fo r Unit s 2 an

d 3 an d instantaneou s fo r Unit 4 3 . Complianc e wit h standards . [4 0 C.F.R , § 63.1206(b)(1) ] Th e emissio n standard s an d operatin g requirement s derive d fro m4 0 C.F.R . Par t 63 , Subpar

t EEE , appl y a

t al l time s except : (a ) Durin g period s o f

startup , shutdown , an

d malfunction ; an

d (b ) Whe n hazardou s wast e i s no t i n th e combustio n chambe

r (i.e. , th e hazardou s wast

e fee d t o th e combusto

r ha s bee n cu t off fo r aperio d o f

tim e not les s tha n th e hazardou s wast

e residenc e time ) an

d th e Pennitte e ha

s documented i n th

e operatin g recor

d complianc e with al l otherwise

applicabl e requirement s and standard s promulgate d unde r authorit y o f section s 11 2 (e.g. , 4 0 C.F.R . Par t 63 , Subparts LLL , DDDDD , an d NNNNN ) or

12 9 o f th e Clea n Ai r

Ac t i n lie u o f th e emissio n standard s unde r 4 0 C.F.R . § § 63.1203 , 63.1204 , 63.1205 , 63.1215 , 63.1216 , 63.1217 , 63.1218 , 63.1219 , 63.1220 , and 63.1221 ; th e monitorin g an

d complianc e standards o f

4 0 C.F.R . § § 63.120 6 through 63.1209 , except th e mode s o f operatio n requirement s o f § 63.1209(q) ; an

d th e notification , reporting , and recordkeepin g requirement s o f § § 63.121 0 through 63.1212 . 4 . Change s i n design , operation , o r maintenance . [4

0 C.F.R . § 63.1206(b)(5) ] (a ) I f th e Permitte e plan s t

o change (a

s define di n 4

0 C.F.R . § 63.1206(b)(5 ) (iii) ) th

e design , operation , o

r maintenanc e practice s ofth e source i n amanne

r tha t ma y adversely affec t

complianc e with an

y emissio n standar d tha t i s not monitore d with aCEMS , th e Permittee mus t

not bur n hazardou s wast

e fo r mor e tha n atota l o f 720 hours (renewable a

t th e discretio n o f

th e Administrator ) an

d onl y fo r th e purpose s o f

pretestin g o

r comprehensiv e performanc e testing . Pretestin g i s define da t 4 0 C.F.R . § 63.1207(h)(2)(i ) and (ii) . [4 0 C.F.R . § 63.1206(b)(5)(i)(C)(l) ] (i ) Th e Permittee ma

y petitio n th

e Administrato r

t o obtai n writte n approva l t o bur n hazardou s wast

e i n th e interi mprio r

t o submittin g a Notificatio n o f

Complianc e fo r

purpose s othe

r tha n testin g o

r pretesting . Th e Permitte e must specif y operatin g requirements ,

VES01748 0Veoli a E S Technica l Solutions , L.L.C . Page 1 9 o f 17 2 Permi tNo. : V-IL-1716300103-2014-1 0 Issuance Date : DRAF T ExpirationDate - DRAF T includin g limit s on operatin g parameter s tha t th e Permittee determine s wil l ensur

e complianc e with th

e emissio n standards o f 4 0 C.F.R . Par

t 63 , Subpar

t EEE , base

d o n availabl e information . Th e Administrato r

wil l review , modif

y a s necessary , an

d approv e i f warranted th

e interi moperating requirements . [4 0 C.F.R . § 63.1206(b)(5)(i)(C)(2) ] (ii ) Nothin g i n thi s permi t exempts an

y change s mad

e unde r thi s provisio n fro man

y applicabl e requirement s unde r Titl e I o f th e CAA . [4 0 C.F.R . § 71.6(a)(1) ] (b) Notification. [4

0 C.F.R . § 63.1206(b)(5) ] Th e Permittee must

compl y with th

e notificatio n requirements o f conditio n 2.1(E)(9) , below . 5 . General Operating Requirements . [40 C.F.R . § 63.1206(c)(1) ] (a ) Th e Permittee must

operat e unde r th e operatin g requirement s specifie di n th e Documentatio n o f

Complianc e (DOC ) unde r 4 0 C.F.R . § 63.1211(c ) o r th e NO C unde

r 4 0 C.F.R . § § 63.12070 ) an d 63.1210(d) , except : (i ) Durin g performanc e tests unde r approved tes t

plan s accordin g t

o 4 0 C.F.R . § 63.1207(e) , (f) , an d (g) ; (ii ) Unde

r th e provision s o f

conditio n 2.1(C)(3)(a

) o r (b) , above ; an

d (iii ) A s provide db y conditio n 2.1(C)(2) , above . (b ) Documentatio n o f

Compliance . [4

0 C.F.R . § 63.1211(c) ] Th e Permittee' s operatin g record must includ e aDOC . The DO C mus t identif y th e applicabl e emissio n standards unde r 4 0 C.F.R . Par

t 63 , Subpar

t EEE , an d th e limit s o n th

e operatin g parameter

s unde r 4 0 C.F.R . § 63.120 9 tha t wil l ensur

e complianc e wit h thos e emissio n standards . (c ) Failure t

o compl y wit h th

e operatin g requirement s i s failur e t o ensur e complianc e with th

e emissio n standards o f

40 C.F.R . Par

t 63 , Subpar

t EEE . 6 . Startup , Shutdown , an d Malfunctio n Plan . [4

0 C.F.R . § § 63.6(e)(3) , 63.1206(c)(2) ] (a ) Th e Permittee i s subjec t t o th e startup , shutdown , an

d malfunctio n plan requirements o f

40 C.F.R . § 63.6(e)(3) . [4 0 C.F.R . § 63.1206(c)(2)(i) ]

VES01748 1Veoli a E S Technica l Solutions , L.L.C . Pag e 2 0 o f 17 2 Permi tNo. : V-IL-1716300103-2014-1 0 Issuance Date : DRAF T ExpirationDate : DRAF T (i ) Th e Permitte e mus t develo p awritte n startup , shutdown , an d malfunctio n pla

n tha t describes , i n detail , procedure s fo r operating an d maintainin g the sourc e durin g period s o f startup , shutdown , an

d malfunction ; an

d aprogra

mo f correctiv e actio n fo r

malfunctionin g process , air

pollutio n control , an

d monitorin g equipmen

t use d t o compl y with th

e relevant standard . Th

e startup , shutdown , an

d malfunctio n plan doe s not nee d to addres s an

y scenari o tha

t woul d not caus e th e sourc e t o exceed a

n applicabl e emissio n limitatio n i n th e relevan t standard . The purpos e o f th e startup , shutdown , an

d malfunctio n plan i s to : A . Ensur

e that , a t al l times , th

e Permittee operate s an

d maintain s eac h affecte d source , includin g associate d air pollutio n contro l an d monitorin g equipment , i n amanne r whic h satisfie s th

e genera l dut y to minimiz e emission s established b y 4 0 C.F.R . § 63.6(e)(l)(i) ; B . Ensur

e tha t the Permittee i s prepared t o correc t malfunction s as soon a s practicabl e afte

r their occurrenc e i n orde

r to minimiz e exces s emission s o f

hazardou s ai

r pollutants ; an

d C . Reduc e th

e reportin g burden associated with period s o f startup , shutdown , an d malfunctio n (includin g correctiv e actio n take n t p restor e malfunctionin g proces s an d ai r pollutio n contro l equipmen t t o it s norma

l o r usua l manne r o f operation) . [4 0 C.F.R . § 63.6(e)(3)(i) ] (ii ) Th e Permitte e mus t

maintai n a

t th e affecte d sourc e acurren t startup , shutdown , and malfunctio n pla n and must

mak e th e pla n availabl e upo n request

fo r inspectio n an

d copyin g b y th

e Administrator . I

n addition , i f

th e startup , shutdown , an

d malfunctio n pla

n i s subsequentl

y revise d a

s provide di n 4

0 C.F.R . § 63.6(e)(3)(viii) , th e Permitte e mus t

maintai n a

t th e affecte d sourc e each previou s (i.e. , superseded

) versio n o f

th e startup , shutdown , an

d malfunctio n plan , an d must mak e eac h previou s versio n availabl e fo r inspectio n an

d copyin g b y th

e Administrato r

fo r aperio d o f

5 years after

revisio n o f th e plan . I f

a t an y tim e afte r adoptio n o f

astartup , shutdown , an

d malfunctio n plan a

n affecte d sourc e cease s operatio n o r i s otherwis e n o longe r subjec t t o th e provision s o f

thi s part, th

e Permitte e mus

t retai n acop y o f

th e mos t recen t plan fo r 5 years fro mth

e dat e th e sourc e cease s operatio n o r i s no longe

r subject to 4 0 C.F.R . Par

t 63 , an d must mak e th e pla n availabl e upo

n request fo r inspectio n an

d copyin g b y th

e Administrator . Upo n receip t o f awritte n request fro mth e Administrato r

tha t th e Permittee submi

t acop y o f an y

VES01748 2Veoli a E S Technica l Solutions , L.L.C . Pag e 21 o f 17 2 Permi tNo. : V-IL-1716300103-2014-1 0 Issuance Date : DRAF T ExpirationDate : DRAF T startup , shutdow n an d malfunctio n pla

n (o r portio n thereof

) whic h th e Permittee maintain s a

t th e affecte d sourc e or

whic h i s i n th

e possessio n o f

th e Permittee , th

e Permitte e mus t

promptl y submi

t a cop y ofth e requeste

d plan (o r aportio n thereof).to th

e Administrator . Th e Permitte e ma y elect t o submit th e require d cop y o f an y startup , shutdown , an

d malfunctio n pla n t

o th e Administrato r i n a n electroni c format . Th e Permittee ma y clai mtha

t an y portio n o f suc h astartup , shutdown , an d malfunctio n plan i s confidential busines s informatio n (CBI ) entitle d t o protectio n fro mdisclosur e unde r sectio n 114(c ) ofth e Ac t o r 4 0 C.F.R . § 2.301 . I f

th e Permittee make s aCB I claim , i t mus t clearl y designat

e i n th e submissio n th

e materia l whic h i t claim s a s confidential . [4

0 C.F.R . § 63.6(e)(3)(v) ] (iii ) T o satisf

y th e requirements o f

4 0 C.F.R . § 63. 6 t

o develo p astartup , shutdown , an

d malfunctio n plan , th

e Permitte e ma

y us e th e affecte d source' s standar

d operatin g procedure s (SOP ) manual , a n Occupationa

l Safet y an d Healt

h Administratio n (OSHA) , o r othe r plan , provide dth

e alternativ e plan s mee

t al l th e requirements o f

4 0 C.F.R . § 63. 6 an

d th e Permittee make s th

e alternativ e plan s availabl e fo r inspectio n when requested b y th e Administrator . [4

0 C.F.R . § 63.6(e)(3)(vi) ] (iv ) Th e Permittee must

revis e th e startup , shutdow n an

d malfunctio n pla n i f require db y th

e Administrato r

t o d o s o base d on th e result s o f adeterminatio n mad

e unde r 4 0 C.F.R . § 63.6(e)(l)(i) , o r i f th e Administrato r

finds tha t th e plan : A . Doe s not

addres s astartup , shutdown , or malfunctio n even

t tha t ha s occurred ; B . Fail s t

o provid e fo r

th e operation o f

th e sourc e (includin g associated air

pollutio n contro l and monitorin g equipment ) durin g astartup , shutdown , o r malfunctio n even

t i n amanne

r consisten t with th e genera l dut y t o minimiz e emission s establishe d b y 4 0 C.F.R . § 63.6(e)(l)(i) ; C . Doe s not

provide adequat

e procedure s fo r

correctin g malfunctionin g proces s and/o r ai r pollutio n contro l an

d monitorin g equipmen

t a s quickl y a

s practicable ; o

r D . Include s a

n even t tha t doe s no t mee t th e definitio n o f

startup , shutdown , o

r malfunctio n liste d i n 4

0 C.F.R . § 63.2 . [4 0 C.F.R . § 63.6(e)(3)(vii) ]

VES01748 3Veoli a E S Technica l Solutions , L.L.C . Pag e 22 o f 17 2 Permi tNo. : V-IL-1716300103-2014-1 0 Issuanc e Date : DRAF T ExpirationDate : DRAF T (v ) The Permitte e ma y periodicall y revis e the startup , shutdown , an d malfunctio n pla

n fo r th e affecte d sourc e a

s necessar y to satisf

y th e requirement s o f

4 0 C.F.R . Par

t 6 3 o r to reflec t change s i n equipmen

t o r procedure s a

t th e affecte d source . Th e Permittee ma y mak e suc h revision s t

o th e startup , shutdown , an

d malfunctio n plan withou t prio r approva l b y th e Administrato r

o r th e permittin g authority . However , th

e Permittee must

repor t eac h revisio n to the startup , shutdown , an

d malfunctio n pla

n i n th e semiannua

l repor t require d b y 4 0 C.F.R . § 63.10(d)(5) . I f th e startup , shutdown , an d malfunctio n plan fail s t

o addres s o

r inadequatel

y addresse s a

n even t tha t meet s th e characteristic s o f

amalfunctio n bu

t wa s not include di n th

e startup , shutdown , an

d malfunctio n plan a

t th e tim e the Permittee develope dth

e plan , th e Permittee must

revis e th e startup , shutdown , an d malfunctio n pla

n withi n 4 5 day s afte r

th e even t t o includ e detaile dprocedure s fo r

operating an

d maintainin g th

e sourc e durin g simila r malfunctio n events , and aprogra mo f correctiv e actio n fo r simila r malfunction s o f

proces s o

r air pollutio n contro l and monitorin g equipment . I n th e even t tha t th e Permitte e make s an

y revisio n to th

e startup , shutdown , an

d malfunctio n pla n whic h alters th e scop e o f

th e activitie s a

t th e sourc e whic h ar

e deeme d t o be a startup , shutdown , o

r malfunction , o

r otherwis e modifie s th

e applicability o f

an y emissio n limit , wor

k practic e requirement , or othe r requiremen

t i n astandar

d establishe d unde

r 4 0 C.F.R . Par

t 63 , th e revise d plan shal l not

tak e effec t unti l after

th e Permitte e ha

s provide dawritte n notic e describin g th e revisio n t

o th e Administrator . [4

0 C.F.R . § 63.6(e)(3)(viii) ] (vi ) An y revision s mad

e t o th e startup , shutdown , an

d malfunctio n pla

n i n accordanc e wit

h th e procedure s establishe d b y 4 0 C.F.R . Par t 6 3 shal l no t b e deeme

d t o constitut

e revision s t

o thi s permit , and th

e elements ofth e startup , shutdown , an d malfunctio n pla

n shal l no t

be considere d a

n applicabl e requiremen

t a s define di n 4 0 C.F.R . § § 70. 2 an d 71.2 . [4

0 C.F.R . § 63.6(e)(3)(ix) ] (vii ) Th e procedure s specifie di n th e startup , shutdown , and malfunctio n pla n d o no t fal l withi n th

e permit shiel dprovide d i n conditio n 4.2 1 ofthi s permit . [4

0 C.F.R . § 63.6(e)(3)(ix) ] (b ) Th e Permittee i s subject

t o th e followin g provision s o f 4 0 C.F.R . § 63.1206(c)(2 ) an

d (3) : (i ) The Permittee mus

t identif y i n th e startup , shutdown , an

d malfunctio n pla

n aprojected oxyge

n correctio n factor , base

d o n

VES01748 4Veoli a E S Technica l Solutions , L.L.C . Pag e 2 3 o f 17 2 Permi tNo. : V-IL-1716300103-2014-1 0 Issuance Date : DRAF T Expiratio n Date : DRAF T norma l operations , t

o use durin g period s o f

startu p an dshutdown . [4 0 C.F.R . § 63.1206(c)(2)(iii) ] (ii ) Th e Permitte e must

recor dthe startup , shutdown , and malfunctio n pla n i n th e operating record . [4

0 C.F.R . § 63.1206(c)(2)(iv) ] (iii ) Operatin g unde

r th e startup , shutdown , an

d malfunctio n plan : [4 0 C.F.R . § 63.1206(c)(2)(v)(A) ] A . Complianc e with automati c wast e fee dcutof

f (AWFCO ) requirements during malfunctions : I . Durin g malfunctions , the AWFC O requirement s o f conditio n 2.1(C)(7 ) ofthi s permit continu e t

o apply , except fo r conditio n 2. 1 (C)(7)(e) . I f ther e i s a n exceedanc e o f

a4 0 C.F.R . Par

t 63 , Subpar

t EEE , emissio n standar

dmonitore db y aCEM S or COM S o r operating limi t

specifie dunde

r 4 0 C.F.R . § 63.1209 , th

e automati c wast

e fee d cutof

f syste mmus t immediately andautomatically cutof

f th e hazardou s wast

e feed , except a s provide db y conditio n 2.1(C)(7)(f ) o f thi s permit . I f

th e malfunctio n itsel f

prevents immediat

e an d automati c cutof

f o f th e hazardou s wast

e feed , th e Permitte e mus

t ceas e feedin g hazardou s wast e a s quickl y a s possible . II . Althoug h th

e automatic wast

e fee dcutof

f requirement s continue to apply durin g amalfunction , a n exceedance o f a n emissio n standar

dmonitore db y aCEM S or COM S o r operating limi t

specifie dunde

r 4 0 C.F.R . § 63.120 9 i s no

t aviolatio n o f

4 0 C.F.R . Par

t 63 , Subpar t EEE , i f th e sourc e continue s t

o operat e i n accordanc e wit

h 4 0 C.F.R . § 63.6(e)(1)] . [40 C.F.R . § 63.1206(c)(2)(v)(A)(2) ] III . Excessiv e numbe

r o f exceedance s durin g malfunctions . Fo r eac h se t o f 1 0 exceedance s o f

a n emissio n standar

d o r operating requiremen

t whil e hazardou s wast

e remain s i n th e combustio n chambe

r (i.e. , whe n th

e hazardou s wast e residenc e time ha

s not transpire dsinc e th

e hazardou s wast

e fee dwas cutoff

) durin g a60-da

y bloc k period , th e Permittee must : (aa ) Withi n 45 day s ofth e 10t h exceedance , complet

e a n investigatio n ofth e caus e o f each exceedanc e

VES01748 5Veoli a E S Technica l Solutions , L.L.C . Pag e 2 4 o f 17 2 Permi tNo. : V-IL-1716300103-2014-1 0 Issuance Date : DRAF T ExpirationDate : DRAF T an d evaluatio n o f

approache s t

o minimiz e th

e frequency , duration , an

dseverit y o f each exceedance , an d revis e th e startup , shutdown , and malfunctio n plan a

s warrante db y th

e evaluatio n t o minimiz e th

e frequency , duration , andseverit y o f eac h exceedance ; and (bb) Recordth

e result s o f

th e investigatio n an

d evaluatio n i n th

e operating record , an

dinclude a summar y o f th e investigatio n andevaluation , an d an y change s to th

e startup , shutdown , an

d malfunctio n plan , i n th

e exces s emission s repor

t require d unde

r conditio n 2.1(D ) o f

thi s permi

t an d 4 0 C.F.R . § 63.10(e)(3) . [4 0 C.F.R . § 63.1206(c)(2)(v)(A) ] B . Complianc e with AWFC O requirement s whe n burnin g hazardou s wast

e durin g startu

p andshutdown : [4

0 C.F.R . § 63.1206(c)(2)(v)(B) ] I . I f th e Permittee feed s hazardou s wast e durin g startu

p o r shutdown , th

e Permitte e must

includ e wast

e fee d restriction s (e.g., typ e andquantity) , andothe r appropriat e operating condition s an dlimit s i n th

e startup , shutdown , an

dmalfunctio n plan . [4

0 C.F.R . § 63.1206(c)(2)(v)(B)(l) ] II . The Permittee mus

t interloc k th e operatin g limit s establishe d unde

r conditio n 2. 1 (C)(6)(iii)(B)(l) , above , with th e automatic wast

e fee dcutof

f syste mrequired unde r conditio n 2.1(C)(7) , except fo r conditio n 2.1(C)(7)(e) . [4

0 C.F.R . § 63.1206(c)(2)(v)(B)(2) ] III . Whe n feedin g hazardou s wast e durin g startu

p or shutdown , th

e automati c wast

e fee dcutof

f syste mmust immediately an

dautomaticall y cutof

f th e hazardou s wast e fee di f th e Permitte e exceed s th

e operatin g limit s establishe d unde

r conditio n 2.1(C)(6)(b)(iii)(B)(l ) o f thi s permit , excep

t a s provide dby conditio n 2.1(C)(7) . [40 C.F.R . § 63.1206(c)(2)(v)(B)(3) ] IV . Althoug h th

e automati c wast

e fee d cutof

f requirements o f 4 0 C.F.R . § 63.120 6 (c)(2)(v)(B)(4 ) appl y durin g startu p an dshutdown , a

n exceedanc e o f

a n emissio n standar do r operating limi t

i s no t aviolatio n o f

Subpar t

VES01748 6Veoli a E S Technica l Solutions , L.L.C . Pag e 2 5 o f 17 2 Permi tNo. : V-IL-1716300103-2014-1 0 Issuance Date : DRAT T ExpirationDate : DRAF T EE E i f th e Permittee operate s i n accordanc e wit h 4 0 C.F.R . § 63.6(e)(1) . [4

0 C.F.R . § 63.1206(c)(2)(v)(B)(4) ] (c ) Th e Permittee shal l not caus e o r allo w th e continue doperation o f a n emissio n source durin g malfunctio n o r breakdow n o f

th e emissio n sourc e o r related air

pollutio n contro l equipmen t i f suc h operatio n woul dcaus e a violatio n o f

th e standard s o

r limitation s se

t fort h i n th

e Illinoi s Administrativ e Code , Subchapte r c : Emissio n Standard s an dLimitation s fo r Stationar y Sources . Th e Permittee shal l no t caus e o r allo w violatio n o f the standards o

r limitation s se

t fort h i n Subchapte

r c : Emissio n Standards andLimitation s fo r

Stationar y Source s durin g startup . [3 5 IA C 201.149 ] 7 . Automati c wast

e fee dcutof

f (AWFCO) . [4

0 C.F.R . § 63.1206(c)(3) ] (a ) Th e Permittee must

operat e th e hazardou s wast

e combusto

r with a functionin g AWFC O syste mtha t immediately and automatically cuts off the hazardou s wast

e feed , except

a s provide d b y conditio n 2.1(C)(7)(f) : (i ) Whe n an

y o f the followin g ar

e exceeded : Operatin g paramete r limit s specifie dunde

r conditio n 2.1(C ) ofthi s permi t an d4 0 C.F.R . § 63.1209 ; a

n emissio n standar

dmonitore d b y aCEMS ; an dth e allowabl e combustio n chambe r pressure ; (ii ) Whe n th

e spa n valu e o f

any CM S detector , except aCEMS , i s me

t o r exceeded ; (iii ) Upo n malfunctio n o f aCM S monitorin g a

n operatin g paramete

r limi t specifie dunde

r conditio n 2.1(C ) o f

thi s permi t

an d4 0 C.F.R . § 63.120 9 or

a n emissio n level ; o

r (iv) When an

y componen

t o f th e AWFC O systemfails . [4 0 C.F.R . § 63.1206(c)3)(i) ] (b) Ductin g o f

combustio n gases . Durin g a n AWFCO , th

e Permittee must continu e t o duct combustio n gasse s t

o th e ai r pollutio n contro l syste

m whil e hazardou s wast

e remain s i n th

e combustio n chambe

r (i.e. , i f th e hazardou s wast

e residenc e tim

e ha s no t transpire dsinc e th

e hazardou s wast e fee d cutof

f systemwas activated) . [4 0 C.F.R . § 63.1206(c)(3)(H) ] (c ) Restartin g wast

e feed . Th e Permittee must continu e t

o monitor durin g th e cutof f th e operating parameters fo r whic h limit s ar

e establishedunde

r conditio n 2.1(C ) o f

thi s permit

an d4 0 C.F.R . § 63.120 9 an

d th e emission s require d unde

r tha t sectio n t o b e monitore db y aCEMS , an dmust no t restar t th e hazardou s wast

e fee dunti l th

e operatin g parameter

s an d

VES01748 7Veoli a E S Technica l Solutions , L.L.C . Pag e 2 6 o f 17 2 Permi tNo. : V-IL-1716300103-2014-1 0 Issuance Date : DRAF T ExpirationDate : DRAF T

emissio n level s ar

e withi n th

e specifie dlimits . [4

0 C.F.R . § 63.1206(c)(3)(iii) ] (d ) Failur e ofth e AWFC O system . I f the AWFC O syste

mfail s t o automaticall y an

d immediately cu

t of f th e flo w o f hazardou s wast

e upo n exceedanc e o f

aparamete

r require dt

o be interlocke dwith th

e AWFC O syste munde r conditio n 2.1(C)(7)(a) , th e Permittee ha

s faile dto compl y wit h th e AWFC O requirements o f conditio n 2.1(C)(7) . I f

a n equipmen

t o r othe r failur e prevents immediat e andautomati c cutof

f o f th e hazardou s wast e feed , however , th

e Permittee must

ceas e feedin g hazardou s wast e a s quickl y a s possible . [4

0 C.F.R . § 63.1206(c)(3)(iv) ] (e ) Correctiv e measures . If , afte r an y AWFCO , ther

e i s a n exceedanc e o f

a n emissio n standar

do r operating requirement , irrespectiv e o f whethe r th e exceedance occurre dwhil e hazardou s wast e remainedi n th

e combustio n chambe r (i.e. , whethe

r th e hazardou s wast

e residenc e tim

e ha s transpire d sinc e th e hazardou s wast

e fee d cutof

f syste mwa s activated) , th

e Permittee must investigat

e th e caus e o f

th e AWFCO , tak

e appropriat

e correctiv e measure s t

o minimiz e futur

e AWFCOs , andrecor

dth e finding s an

d correctiv e measure s i n th e operatin g record . [4

0 CF.R . § 63.1206(c)(3)(v) ] (f ) Rampin g dow n wast

e feed . [40 C.F.R . § 63.1206(c)(3)(viii) ] (i ) The Permitte e ma

y ram p dow n th

e wast e feedrat e o f pumpable hazardou s wast

e ove r aperio dno

t t o exceed 1 minute , excep t a s provide db y conditio n 2.1(C)(7)(f)(ii ) ofthi s permit , below . I f th e Permitte e elect s t

o ram p dow n th

e wast e feed , th e Permittee must documen t ram p down procedure s i n th

e operatin g an

dmaintenanc e plan . The procedure s must specif y tha t th e ram p down begin s immediatel y upo n initiatio n o f AWFC O an

dth e procedure s must prescrib e abon afid e rampin g down . I f a n emissio n standar

do r operating limi t

i s exceede

ddurin g th

e ram p down , th

e Permittee ha

s faile dt o compl y wit

h th e emissio n standards o

r operatin g requirement s o f

4 0 C.F.R . Par

t 63 , Subpar

t EEE . (ii ) I f th e AWFC O i s triggeredb y a n exceedanc e o f

an y o f th e followin g operating limits , th

e Permittee ma

y not ram p dow n th

e wast e fee d cutoff : minimu mcombustio n chambe r temperature , maximum hazardou s wast

e feedrate , o

r an y hazardou s wast

e firin g syste

m operating limit s tha

t ma y b e establishe dfo r

it s combustor . (g ) Complianc e wit

h th e AWFC O requirements i n 4 0 C.F.R . Par

t 63 , Subpar

t EEE , wil l assum

e complianc e wit

h th e requirements fo r

awast e fee dcutof

f interloc k syste mandsensor

s require db y constructio n permit s 87100024 , 88010001 , an

d83120053 . [4

0 C.F.R . § 71.6(a)(3)(i)(A) ]

VES01748 8Veoli a E S Technica l Solutions , L.L.C . Pag e 27 o f 17 2 Permi tNo. : V-IL-1716300103-2014-1 0 Issuance Date : DRAF T Expiratio n Date DRAF T

8 . Emergenc y safet

y ven t (ESV ) openings . [4

0 C.F.R . § 63.1206(c)(4) ] (a ) Failur e t

o mee t standards . I f

a n ES V open s when hazardou s wast e remain s i n th e combustio n chambe

r (i.e. , whe

n th e hazardou s wast

e residenc e time ha s no t expired) durin g a

n even t othe r tha n amalfunctio n a

s define di n th

e startup , shutdown , an

dmalfunctio n pla

n such tha

t combustio n gases ar

e no t treate d a s durin g th

e mos t recen t comprehensiv e performanc e tes t (e.g. , i f th e combustio n ga

s by-passe s an

y emissio n contro l devic e tha t was operatin g durin g th

e performanc e test) , th

e Permitte e mus t

documen t i n th e operating recor

dwhethe r th e source remaine di n complianc e with th e emissio n standards o f

4 0 CF.R . Par

t 63 , Subpar

t EEE , considerin g emission s durin g th

e ES V opening event . [4 0 CF.R . § 63.1206(c)(4)(i) ] (b ) ES V operatm

g plan . [4

0 C.F.R . § 63.1206(c)(c)(4)(ii) ] (i ) Th e Permittee must

develo p a n ES V operating plan , compl y with th e operating plan , an

dkee p th e pla n i n th e operating record . (ii ) The ES V operatin g pla n must provide detaile dprocedure s fo r rapidl y stoppin g th

e wast e feed , shutting dow n th

e combustor , and , i f feasible , maintainin g temperatur e an dnegativ e pressur

e i n th e combustio n chambe

r durin g th e hazardou s wast

e residenc e time . Th e plan mus t

include calculations , informatio n an ddat a documenting th

e effectivenes s o f

th e plan' s procedure s fo r

ensurin g tha t combustio n chambe

r temperatur

e an dnegativ e pressur

e ar e maintaine da

s i s reasonabl

y feasible . (c ) Correctiv e measures . Afte r an y ES V openin g tha

t result s i n afailure t

o mee t th e emissio n standards a

s define di n conditio n 2.1(C)(8)(a ) o f thi s permit , th e Permitte e must

investigat

e th e caus e o f

th e ES V opening , tak

e appropriat e correctiv e measure s t

o minimiz e suc

h futur e ES V openings , an drecor dth e finding s an

dcorrectiv e measure s i n th e operatin g record . [4 0 C.F.R . § 63.1206(c)(4)(iii) ] 9 . Combustio n syste

mleaks . [4

0 C.F.R . § 63.1206(c)(5) ] (a ) Th e Permittee must

contro l combustio n syste mleaks o f

hazardou s ai

r pollutant s b y maintainin g th e maximumcombustio n zon e pressur e lowe r tha n ambien t pressur e usin g a n instantaneou s monitor ; an d[4 0 C.F.R . § 63.1206(c)(5)(i)(B) ] (b) Th e Permittee mus

t specif y i n th e performanc e test

wor k plan an dNO C th e metho dtha

t i t wil l us e t o contro l combustio n syste mleaks . Becaus e th e Permittee control s combustio n syste mleak s b y maintainin g th e

VES01748 9Veoli a E S Technica l Solutions , L.L.C . Pag e 2 8 o f 17 2 Permi tNo. : V-IL-1716300103-2014-1 0 Issuanc e Date : DRAF T ExpirationDate : DRAF T combustio n zone pressur e lowe r tha n ambien t pressur e usin g a n instantaneou s monitor , th e Permittee must

als o specif

y i n th e performanc e test wor k plan an d NO C th e monitorin g and recordin g frequenc y o f th e pressur e monitor , an

d specif y ho w th e monitorin g approac

h i s integrated into th e automatic wast

e fee dcutof

f system . [4

0 C.F.R . § 63.1206(c)(5)(h) ] 10 . Operator

trainin g an

d certification . [4

0 C.F.R . § 63.1206(c)(6) ] (a ) Th e Permittee must

establis h trainin g program s fo r al l categorie s o f personne l whos e activitie s ma

y reasonably b e expected to directl y affec t emission s o f

hazardou s air

pollutant s fro mth

e source . Suc h person s include , bu

t ar e not limite dto , chie f

facilit y operators , contro l roo m operators , continuou s monitorin g syste moperators , person s tha

t sampl e an d analyz e feedstreams , person s tha t manag e an d charge feedstream s t

o th e combustor , person s tha t operat e emissio n contro l devices , an d as h an d wast e handlers . Eac h trainin g progra mshal l b e o f atechnical leve l commensurat

e with th e person' s jo b dutie s specifie di n th e trainin g manual . Eac h commensurat e trainin g progra

mshal l requir

e a n examinatio n t

o b e administere d b y th

e instructor

a t th e en d o f th e trainin g course . Passin g o f

thi s test shal l b e deeme d th e "certification " fo r personnel , except

that , fo r contro l roo moperators , th e trainin g an

d certificatio n progra

mshal l b e a s specifie di n condition s 2.1(C)(10)(c ) throug h (e ) ofthi s permit . [40 C.F.R . § 63.1206(c)(6)® ] (b ) Th e Permittee must ensur e tha t th e source i s operated an

d maintaine d a

t al l time s by person s who ar

e traine d an

d certifie dt

o perfor mthes e an

d an y othe r dutie s tha

t ma y affec t emission s o f

hazardou s air

pollutants . A certifie dcontro l roo moperato r must b e on dut y a t th e sit e a t al l time s th

e sourc e i s i n operation . [4 0 C.F.R . § 63.1206(c)(6)(ii) ] (c ) Hazardou s wast

e incinerator

contro l roo moperators must : [40 C.F.R . § 63.1206(c)(6)(iii) ] (i ) B e traine d an

d certifie dunde

r asite-specific , source-developed an d implemented progra

mtha t meet s th e requirement s o f

conditio n 2.1(C)(10)(d) , below ; o

r (ii ) B e traine d unde

r th e requirements of

, an d certifie dunder , on

e o f th e followin g American Societ y o f Mechanica l Engineer s (ASME ) standards : QHO-1-1994 , QHO-la-1996 , o r QHO-1-200 4 (Standar

d fo r th e Qualificatio n an

d Certificatio n o f

Hazardou s Wast

e Incinerato r Operators) . I f

th e Permittee elect s t

o us e th e ASM E program :

VES01749 0Veoli a E S Technica l Solutions , L.L.C . Pag e 2 9 o f 17 2 Permi tNo. : V-IL-1716300103-2014-1 0 Issuanc e Date : DRAF T ExpirationDate : DRAF T A . Contro l roo moperator s must , prio r

t o th e complianc e date , achiev e provisional certification , and must submit a n applicatio n t

o ASM E an

db e schedule dfo r

th e ful l certificatio n exam . Withi n 1 yea

r o f th e complianc e date , contro l room operators mus

t achiev e ful l certification ; B . Ne w operators an

doperators o f

new source s must , befor e assumin g thei

r duties , achiev e provisiona l certification , an d must submit a n applicatio n t

o ASME , andbe schedule dfo r th e ful l certificatio n exam . Withi n 1 yea r o f assumin g their

duties , thes e operators must

achiev e ful l certification ; or (iii ) B e traine dandcertifie dunde r aStat e program . (d ) Site-specific , sourc e developedan dimplemente dtrainin g program s fo r contro l roo moperators mus t includ e th

e followin g elements : (i ) Trainin g on the followin g subjects : A . Environmenta

l concerns , includin g type s o f emissions ; B . Basi c combustio n principles , includin g product s o f combustion ; C . Operatio n o f

th e specifi c typ e o f

combusto

r usedb y th

e operator , includin g prope r startup , wast

e firing , andshutdown procedures ; D . Combustio n control s an dcontinuou s monitorin g systems ; E . Operatio n o f

ai r pollutio n contro l equipmen t an dfactor s affectin g performance ; F . Inspectio n an

dmaintenanc e o f

the combustor , continuou s monitorin g systems , an

d ai r pollutio n contro l devices ; G . Action s t

o correct malfunction s o

r condition s tha

t ma y lea dt o malfunction ; H . Residu e characteristic s an d handlin g procedures ; an d I . Applicabl e federal , state , an dloca l regulations , includin g Occupationa

l Safet y an dHealt h Administratio n workplac e standards ; an

d ,

VES01749 1Veoli a E S Technica l Solutions , L.L.C . Pag e 3 0 o f 17 2 Permi tNo. : V-IL-1716300103-2014-1 0 Issuanc e Date : DRAF T Expiratio n Date : DRAF T (ii ) A n examinatio n designe dan dadministere d b y th

e instructor ; an

d (iii ) Writte n materia

l coverin g th

e trainin g cours e topic s tha t ma y serve a s referenc e materia

l followin g completio n o f th e course . [40 C.F.R . § 63.1206(c)(6)(v) ] (e ) T o maintai n contro l roo moperato r qualificatio n unde

r asite-specific , sourc e developedandimplemente dtrainin g progra ma s provide db y conditio n 2.1(C)(10)(d) , above , contro l roomoperator s must complet e a n annua l revie w o

r refresher cours e covering , a

t aminimum , th

e followin g topics : (i ) Updat

e o f regulations ; (ii ) Combusto

r operation , includin g startu p and shutdown procedures , wast e firing , andresidue handling ; (iii ) Inspectio n andmaintenance ; (iv ) Response s t

o malfunction s o

r condition s tha

t ma y lea dto malfunction ; an

d (v ) Operatin g problem s encountere db y th e operator . [4 0 C.F.R . § 63.1206(c)(6)(vi) ] (f ) Th e Permittee must

recordth e operato r trainin g an

dcertificatio n progra

m i n th e operating record . [4

0 C.F.R . § 63.1206(c)(6)(vii) ] 11 . Operatio n and maintenanc e plan . [4 0 C.F.R . § 63.1206(c)(7) ] (a ) The Permittee must

prepar e an da t al l time s operat

e accordin g t

o a n operatio n an

dmaintenanc e (O&M ) plan tha t describe s i n detai l procedure s fo r operation , inspection , maintenance , an dcorrectiv e measure s fo r al l components o f

th e combustor , includin g associate dpollutio n contro l equipment , tha

t coul daffec t

emission s o f

regulate d hazardou s air pollutants . [4

0 C.F.R . § 63.1206(c)(7)(i) ] (b ) The plan must

prescrib e ho w th

e Permitte e wil l operat

e an d maintai n th

e combusto r i n amanne

r consisten

t with goo dai r

pollutio n contro l practice s fo r minimizin g emission s a

t least t o th e level s achieve d durin g th e comprehensive performanc e test ; [4 0 C.F.R . § 63.1206(c)(7)(ii) ]

VES01749 2Veoli a E S Technica l Solutions , L.L.C . Pag e 3 1 o f 17 2 Permi tNo. : V-IL-1716300103-2014-1 0 Issuanc e Date : DRAF T ExpirationDate : DRAF T

(c ) Thi s pla

n ensure s complianc e with th e operatio n andmaintenance requirement s o f

4 0 C.F.R . § 63.6(e) an

dminimize s emission s o f pollutants , automati c wast e fee dcutoffs , an dmalfunctions . [4 0 C.F.R . § 63.1206(c)(7)(iii) ] (d ) Th e Permittee must

recor dth e pla n i n th e operatin g record . [4

0 C.F.R . § 63.1206(c)(7)(iv) ] (D ) Monitoring an

d Testin g [4 0 C.F.R . § 71.6(a)(3)(i)(A) ] 1 . Continuou s emission s monitorin g systems (CEMS ) an dcontinuou s opacit

y monitorin g systems (COMS) . [4 0 C.F.R . § 63.1209(a)] : (a ) Th e Permittee must

us e eithe r acarbo n monoxid e o r

hydrocarbo n CEM S t o demonstrat

e an dmonitor

complianc e wit h th

e carbo n monoxid

e o r hydrocarbo n standard . The Permittee must als o us e a

n oxygen CEM S t

o continuousl y correc t

th e carbo n monoxide measurements t o 7 percen

t oxygen . (b ) Afte r

suc h tim e a s th e EP A promulgate s al l performanc e specification s an doperationa

l requirement s applicabl e to P M CEMS , th e Permittee must install , calibrate , maintain , andoperat e aP M CEM S t

o demonstrat

e an d monitor complianc e wit

h th e particulat

e matte r standard s unde

r thi s permit . (c ) Performanc e specifications . Th e Permittee must

install , calibrate , maintain , an

dcontinuousl y operat

e al l CEM S an

dCOM S i n complianc e wit h th e qualit y assuranc e procedure s provide di n the appendix t o 4 0 C.F.R . Par

t 63 , Subpar

t EEE , an dPerformanc e Specification s 1 (opacity) , 4 B (carbo n monoxide an doxygen) , an

d8 A (hydrocarbons ) i n Appendi x B t o 4 0 C.F.R . Par

t 60 . (d ) Carbo n monoxide reading s exceedin g th e spa n shoul db

e recordedi n accordanc e wit

h th e followin g requirement s o f 4 0 C.F.R . § 63.1209(a)(3) : (i ) Excep t

a s provide db y 4 0 C.F.R . § 63.1209(a)(3)(ii) , i f acarbo n monoxide CEM S detects arespons e tha t result s i n a1-minut

e averag e a t or above th e 3,00 0 ppm v spa n leve l require db y Performanc e Specificatio n 4 B i n Appendi x B to 4 0 C.F.R . Par

t 60 , th e Permittee must

recor dth e 1-minut

e averag e a

s 10,00 0 ppmv . The Permittee must

use th e 1-minut e 10,000 ppm

v valu e fo r calculatin g th

e hourl y rollin g averag

e carbo n monoxide level . (ii ) Carbo n monoxide CEM S tha t use aspa n valu e o f

10,00 0 ppm v whe n 1-minut e carbo n monoxide level s ar e equa l to o r exceed3,00

0 ppm v

VES01749 3Veoli a E S Technica l Solutions , L.L.C . Page 3 2 o f 17 2 Permi tNo. : V-IL-1716300103-2014-1 0 Issuance Date : DRAF T Expiratio n Date : DRAF T ar e no t subjec t t o 4 0 C.F.R . § 63.1209(a)(3)(i) . Carbo n monoxid e CEM S tha

t us e aspa n valu e o f

10,00 0 ar e subjec t t o th e sam e CEM S performanc e an

dequipmen

t specification s whe n operating i n th e range o f 3,000 ppm

v t o 10,000 ppm

v tha t ar e provide d b y Performanc e Specificatio n 4 B fo r othe r carbo n monoxide CEMS , except : A . Calibratio n drif

t mus t b e les s tha n 300 ppmv ; an

d B . Calibratio n erro

r must b e les s tha n 50 0 ppmv . '(e ) Hydrocarbo n reading s exceedin g th e span . (i ) Excep t

a s provide db y 4 0 C.F.R . § 63.1209(a)(4)(ii) , i f a hydrocarbo n CEM S detects arespons e tha t result s i n a1-minut

e average a t o r above th e 10 0 ppm v spa n leve l require dby Performanc e Specificatio n 8 A i n Appendi x B t o 4 0 CF.R . Par

t 60 , th e Permittee mus t

recor dth e 1-minut e averag e a

s 50 0 ppmv . The Permitte e must

us e th e 1-minut

e 50 0 ppm v valu e fo r

calculatin g th

e hourl y rollin g average hydrocarbo n level . (ii ) Hydrocarbo n CEM S tha t us e aspa n valu e o f

500 ppm v whe n 1-minut e hydrocarbo n level s ar

e equa l t o or excee d10

0 ppm v ar e not subjec t t o 4 0 C.F.R . § 63.1209(a)(4)(f) . Hydrocarbo n CEM S tha t us e aspa n valu e o f

50 0 ppm v ar e subjec t t o the sam e CEM S performanc e an

dequipmen

t specification s whe n operating i n th e range o f 10 0 ppm v t o 50 0 ppm v tha t ar e provide db y Performanc e Specificatio n 8 A i n Appendi x B t o 4 0 C.F.R . Par

t 6 0 fo r othe r hydrocarbo n CEMS , except : A . Th e zer o an d high-leve l calibratio n ga s mus t have a hydrocarbo n leve l o f

betwee n 0 an d10

0 ppmv , an

dbetwee n

. 25 0 an d 45 0 ppmv , respectively ; B . Th e stri

p char t recorder , computer , o

r digita l recorde

r must be capable o f

recordin g al l reading s withi n th e CE M measuremen

t rang e an dmust hav e aresolutio n o f

2. 5 ppmv ; C . The CEM S calibratio n must no t diffe r b y mor e tha n ±1 5 ppm

v afte r eac h 24-hou r perio d o f th e seve n da y test a t bot h zer o and hig h levels ; D . The calibratio n erro r must b e n o greate r tha n 2 5 ppmv ; an

d

VES01749 4Veoli a E S Technica l Solutions , L.L.C . Pag e 3 3 o f 17 2 PermitNo. : V-IL-1716300103-2014-1 0 Issuanc e Date : DRAF T Expiratio n Date : DRAF T E . Th e zero level , mid-level , an dhig h leve l calibratio n ga s usedt o determin e calibratio n erro

r mus t have ahydrocarbo n leve l o f 0-20 0 ppmv , 150-20

0 ppmv , and 350-40 0 ppmv , respectively . (f ) Petition s t

o us e CEM S fo r

othe r standards . Th e Permittee ma y petitio n EP A t o use CEM S fo r

complianc e monitorin g fo r particulat e matter, mercury , semivolatil e metals , lo w volatil e metals , andhydroge n chloride an dchlorin e ga

s unde r 4 0 C.F.R . § 63.8(f) , i n lie u o f complianc e with th

e corresponding operatin g paramete r limits . (g ) Calculatio n o f

rollin g averages . Th

e Permitte e shal l calculat e rollin g average s i n accordanc e with th e followin g requirement s o f 4 0 CF.R . § 63.1209(a)(6) : (i ) Calculatio n o f

rollin g average s upo n intermitten t operations . The Permittee mus t

ignor e period s o f

time whe n 1-minut

e value s ar

e no t availabl e fo r

calculatin g th

e hourl y rollin g average . Whe n 1-minut e value s becom

e availabl e again , th

e firs t 1-minut e valu e i s adde

d t o th e previou s 5 9 value s t

o calculat e the hourl y rollin g average . [4 0 C.F.R . § 63.1209(a)(6)(h) ] (ii ) Calculatio n o f

rollin g average s when th e hazardou s wast

e fee di s cu

t off . [4 0 CF.R . § 63.1209(a)(6)(iii) ] A . Excep t

a s provide dby conditio n 2.l(D)(l)(g)(ii)(B) , below , the Permitte e must

continue monitorin g carbo n monoxide whe n th e hazardou s wast

e fee d i s cu

t of f i f th e sourc e i s operating . The Permitte e must

no t resum e feedin g hazardou s wast e i f th e emissio n level s exceed th e standard . B . The Permitte e i s not subjec t t o th e CEM S requirements o f 4 0 CF.R . Par

t 63 , Subpar

t EEE , durin g period s o f

tim e th e Permitte e meet

s th e requirement s o f

4 0 C.F.R . § 63.1206(b)(l)(ii ) (complianc e with emission s standards fo r nonhazardou s wast

e burnin g source s whe

n th e Permittee i s not burnin g hazardou s waste) . (h ) Operating paramete

r limit s fo r

hydrocarbons . I f

th e Permittee elect s t

o comply with th

e carbo n monoxide and hydrocarbo n emissio n standar dby continuously monitorin g carbon monoxide wit h aCEMS , th e Permitte e mus t demonstrat

e tha t hydrocarbo n emission s durin g th e comprehensive performanc e test

d o not excee dth e hydrocarbo n emission s standard . I n addition , th

e limit s th

e Permittee establishe s o n th e DR E operating parameter

s require dunde

r 4 0 C.F.R . § 63.1209(j ) als o must ensur e tha t th e Permittee maintain s complianc e with the hydrocarbo n emissio n standard .

VES01749 5Veoli a E S Technica l Solutions , L.L.C . Page 3 4 o f 17 2 Permi tNo. : V-IL-1716300103-2014-1 0 Issuance Date : DRAF T Expiratio n Date : DRAF T

I f th e Permittee doe s not

conduct th e hydrocarbo n demonstration an dDR E test s concurrently , th

e Permittee must

establis h separat

e operating paramete r limit s unde

r 4 0 C.F.R . § 63.1209(j ) base don eac h test, andth

e mor e restrictiv e ofth e operating paramete r limit s applies . (i ) Multi-metal s CEMS . [4 0 C.F.R . § 63.1209(g)(2) ; 4 2 U.S.C . § 7414(a) ] The Permittee shal l install , calibrate , maintai n andoperat e a n x-ray fluorescenc e multi-metal s CEM S fo r us e a s acontinuou s parametri c monitorin g syste

m(CPMS ) o n Unit s 2 , 3 and4 withi n 1 2 month s (36 5 days ) afte r thi s permi t

become s effective , unles s th e Administrato r determine s tha

t atim e extensio n i s warrante dbasedoh th e Permittee' s documentatio

n i n writin g o f

factor s beyond it s contro l tha t preven t th e Permittee fro mmeetin g th e 12-mont

h deadline . Th

e Permittee mus t

als o instal l an doperat e a n oxyge n CEM S on each uni t

t o continuousl y correc t th e multi-metal s CEM S dat at o 7 percen

t oxygen . (i ) Eac h multi-metal s CEM S mus t mee t th e installatio n requirements i n Othe r Tes t Metho d(OTM ) 16 , Performanc e Specificatio n Y Y (Specification s an

dTest Procedure s fo r

X-ra y Fluorescenc e Base d Multi-Metal s Continuou s Emissio n Monitorin g Systems a t Stationar y Sources ) an

dth e on-goin g qualit

y contro l an

dqualit y assurance procedure s se

t forth i n OT M 20 , Procedur e Z (Quality Assuranc e Requirement s fo r X-Ray-Fluorescenc e Base dMulti

Metal s Continuou s Emissio n Monitorin g Systems a t Stationar y Sources ) an

dsubsequen

t revisions . (ii ) A t aminimum , eac

h multi-metal s CEM S shal l measur e an drepor t th e tota l concentration s (regardles s o f speciation ) ofth e followin g metal s i n bot

h thei r vapo r andsoli dform s i n th

e exhaust stream : arsenic , beryllium , cadmium , chromium , lea dan dmercury . I f

th e Permittee install s amulti-metal s CEM S tha t i s incapable o f measuring an

y ofth e specifie dmetals , th e Permittee mus

t quantif y tha t metal' s emission s usin g tha t metal' s feedrat

e a s determined accordin g t

o conditio n 2.1(D)(4)(d) fo r th e most recen t 12-hou r perio dfo r whic h feedstrea

manalysi s dat

afo r tha t meta l i s availabl e an dth e syste mremova

l efficienc y an

d exhaust parameter

s usedb y th e Permittee to estimat

e emission s o f

tha t meta l fo r tha t 12-hou r period . Fo r

thi s purpose , unles s otherwis e approved i n writin g b y EPA , th e Permitte e shal l bas e it s calculation s o n th e affecte d metal' s feedrat e a s determinedaccordin g to conditio n 2.1(D)(4)(d) , syste m remova l efficienc y fro mth

e las t comprehensiv e performanc e test required b y condition s 2.1(D)(8 ) and(10) , an dcontinuou s flo w an

d temperatur

e dat aa s measure db y CM S require d unde r conditio n 2.1(D)(2) .Veoli a E S Technica l Solutions , L.L.C . Pag e 3 5 o f 17 2 Permi tNo. : V-IL-1716300103-2014-1 0 Issuance Date : DRAF T ExpirationDate : DRAF T (iii ) Th e parametri c range fo r

eac h meta l or clas s o f metal s measuredb y th e multi-metal s CEM S i s equa l t o th e emissio n limi t

fo r tha t meta l o r clas s o f metal s specifie di n conditio n 2.1(A)(7 ) o f thi s permit . (iv ) Fo r aperio do f

n o les s tha n 1 2 consecutiv

e months , th e Permitte e shal l operat

e eac h multi-metal s CEM S a t al l time s except

durin g period s o f monitor downtim e du e to calibration , qualit

y assurance checks o r scheduled maintenance . Operatio n "a t al l times " i s define da s th e collectio n o f

a t leas t on e measuremen

t fo r eac h successiv e 15-minut

e period . I n orde

r t o calculat

e avali done-hou

r bloc k average , validresult s mus t be availabl e fo r

a t least thre e o f th e fou r 15-minut e cycle s i n eac

h hour . (v ) Durin g th

e perio dwhe

n each multi-metal s CEM S i s installe dan d operating , th

e Permitte e shal l calculate andrecor d 1-hou r rollin g averag e emission s fro mth

e ra w dat aobtaine db y eac

h CEMS . The Permittee shal l als o calculat e a12-hou

r rollin g average o f

dat afo r eac h CEMS , calculate d eac

h hou r a s th e average o f

dat acollecte d ove r th e previou s 1 2 operatin g hours . Th e Permittee shal l maintai n fo r fiv e years al l dat

ause di n al l calculations . (vi ) Th e Permittee shal l repor

t t o EP A i n accordanc e wit h conditio n 2.1(D)(l)(i)(x ) fo r

ever y 12-hou r averagin g perio ddurin g whic h th e 12-hou r averag e emission s fro man y incinerator

wer e highe r tha n th e limit s i n conditio n 2. 1 (A)(7 ) whethe r o r not th e level s o f

metal s i n th e feedstrea

mcomplie dwith th

e OPL s i n th

e permit . (vii ) Durin g period s whe n an y multi-metal s CEM S i s malfunctioning , o r durin g period s o f

monitor downtim e du e t o calibration , qualit

y assurance check s o

r schedule dmaintenance , th e Permittee shal l use dat afro mfeedstrea

manalysis , performanc e tests and/o r othe r CMSs , a s provide di n thi s permit , t o demonstrat

e complianc e a

t th e respectiv e incinerator

with th e applicabl e emission s limit s provide d tha t th e monito r downtim e lasts a t leas t thre e ofth e fou r

15-minut e cycle s i n eac

h hou r neede dt o calculate avali done-hou r bloc k average . (viii ) Durin g th

e perio dwhe

n an y multi-metal s CEM S i s bein g operated , th e Permittee must

continue to operat

e othe r CM S require dunde

r conditio n 2.1(D)(2 ) fo r

th e respectiv e incinerator , an dmust monitor feedrate s fo r

the incinerator

usin g th e procedure s contained i n th e feedstrea manalysi s pla

n require dunde

r conditio n 2.1(D)(4)(b) , an d th e supplementa

l procedure s containe d i n conditio n 2.1(D)(4)(d)(2) . (ix ) A t th e en do f th e 12-mont

h perio ddurin g whic h eac h multi-metal s CEM S wa s continuousl y operated , th e Permittee ma

y petitio n th

e

VES01749 7Veoli a E S Technica l Solutions , L.L.C . Pag e 3 6 o f 17 2 Permi tNo. : V-IL-1716 3 00103-2014-1 0 Issuance Date : DRAF T ExpirationDate : DRAF T Administrator , i n accordanc e wit h 4 0 C.F.R . § 63.1209(a)(5) , t o continu e t o us e an y o r al l o f th e multi-metal s CEM S fo r complianc e monitorin g fo r

mercury , LV M an

d SV M unde

r 4 0 CF.R . § 63.8(f

) i n lie u o f complianc e wit

h th e correspondin g operating paramete r limit s fo r th e respectiv e incinerators . (x ) An y one-hou

r bloc k average CEM S readin g above an y parametric range , a s define di n conditio n 2.1(D)(l)(i)(iii) , i s adeviation . (xi ) I f th e dat afro man y multi-metal s CEM S show adeviation , a s define di n conditio n 2. 1 (D) ( 1 )(i)(x) , the Pennitte e mus t analyz e th

e feedstrea manalysi s dat

afo r th e wast e burne da t th e time ofth e deviatio n an

dth e combustio n condition s tha t existe d a t th e tim e o f th e deviatio n t

o determin

e wh y th e deviatio n occurred . The Permittee wil l sen

dt o th e Administrato r

withi n 3 0 day s o f

th e deviatio n al l feedstrea

manalysi s dat

afo r th e perio dofth e deviatio n an dit s analysi s ofth e caus e o f th e deviation , action s taken t o addres s th e deviation , an

dth e correspondin g 12-hou

r averag e concentratio n o f each affecte d meta

l o r clas s o f metal s fo r

th e measuremen

t perio d tha t include s th

e hour(s ) fo r

whic h adeviatio n occurred . (xii ) Fro mth

e tim e tha t aCEM S record s adeviation , th e Permittee mus

t immediatel y tak

e correctiv e actio n t

o reduc e emission s o f

th e affecte d metal(s ) an

drecor dal l correctiv e action s taken . Correctiv e action s ma

y include , bu

t ar e not limite dto , sto

p feedin g o

r reduce th e feedrat e o f th e batc h o f wast e burne dwhen th

e deviatio n occurred , o

r adjustmen

t to combustio n conditions . Th e Permittee must documen t al l correctiv e action s i n th e repor t require d b y conditio n 2 . l(D)(l)(i)(x) . (xiii ) I f operatio n ofth e multi-metal s CEM S durin g th e 12-mont

h period , i n conjunctio n with feedstrea manalysi s o

r othe r relevan t data , reveal s tha

t an y o f th e feedrat e limit s include di n thi s permi t mus t be mad e mor e stringen t i n orde r t o assur e complianc e with th

e applicabl e emission s limits , EP A wil l reope n thi s permit , pursuan

t t o 4 0 C.F.R . § 71.7(f) , t

o eithe r revis e th e affecte dfeedrat

e limit s o r requir e operation o f

th e multi-metal s CEM S fo r alonge r perio d o f time o r permanently . (xiv ) I f operatio n o f

th e multi-metal s CEM S durin g th e 12-mont

h period , i n conjunctio n with feedstrea manalysi s o

r othe r relevan t data , reveal s tha

t an y ofth e feedrat

e limit s include di n thi s permit ar e mor e stringen t tha n necessar

y t o assur e complianc e with th

e applicabl e emission s limits , th e Permitte e ma

y petitio n th

e Administrato r

t o use th e result s o f

historica l comprehensiv e performanc e tests , feedstrea manalysis , an

dCEM S dat

at o establis hVeoli a E S Technica l Solutions , L.L.C . Pag e 3 7 o f 17 2 Permi tNo. : V-IL-1716300103-2014-1 0 Issuance Date : DRAF T Expiratio n Date : DRAF T highe r feedrat e limit s fo r

th e affecte d incinerator s provide dth e CEM S dat

ademonstrat

e tha t complianc e woul db

e assure da t th e highe r feedrat e limit s regardles s o f

th e wast e burned . Nothin g i n thi s permi t o r 4 0 C.F.R . Par

t 63 , Subpar

t EEE , obligate s the Administrato r

t o approve apetitio n fo r

revise d feedrat

e limits . (xv ) Notwithstandin g th

e specifi c recordkeepin g an dreportin g requirements containe di n conditio n 2.1(E ) ofthi s permit , th e Permitte e shall , o n aquarterly basis , submit t o EP A asummar

y o f emission s dat

arecorde db y each multi-metal s CEM S an dth e 1-hou r an d12-hou r rollin g average mercury , SV M andLV M feedrate s recordeddurin g th

e sam e period . Th e emission s dat asummar y shal l include : A . Th e 1-hou

r an d12-hou r rollin g average concentration s o f mercury , LV M an

dSV M a s recorde d b y th

e multi-metal s CEMS , i n th

e unit s o f the applicabl e MAC T standards (p.g/dscm , correcte dto 7 percen t oxygen) ; B . The 12-hou

r rollin g average feedrates , a s determined throug

h th e require d feedstrea

manalyse s conducte ddurin g th e sam e period ; C . Sample calculations , equation s or othe r dat ausedby th

e Permitte e t

o conver t CEM S an

dfeedrat e data ; D . The tota

l duratio n i n minute s o f

an y exces s emission s durin g th e reportin g period , th

e 1-hou r an d12-hou r rollin g averag

e concentration s recorde ddurin g eac h perio d o f

exces s emissions , th

e tota l duratio n o f

exces s emission s expressed a s a percen t ofth e tota

l sourc e operatin g tim e durin g tha t reportin g period , an

d abreakdow n o f

th e tota l duratio n o f

exces s emission s durin g th

e reportin g perio dinto thos e tha t ar e du e t o startup/shutdown , contro l equipmen t problems , proces s problems , othe

r know n causes , an

dothe r unknow n causes ; an

d E . Al l deviation s tha

t occurre ddurin g th

e reportin g perio dan

d correctiv e action s taken . 2 . Othe r continuou s monitorin g systems (CMS) . [4 0 C.F.R . § 63.1209(b) ] (a ) Th e Permitte e mus

t use CM S (e.g. , thermocouples , pressur e transducers , flo w meters ) t

o documen

t complianc e wit

h th e applicabl e operating paramete r limit s unde

r 4 0 C.F.R . § 63.1209 .

VES01749 9