alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# C_2012139EN.01001901.xml

| 15.5.2012 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 139/19 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

15.5.2012

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 139/19

---

Notice for the attention of the persons and entities to which restrictive measures provided for in Council Decision 2011/782/CFSP, as implemented by Council Implementing Decision 2012/256/CFSP, and Council Regulation (EU) No 36/2012, as implemented by Council Implementing Regulation (EU) No 410/2012 concerning restrictive measures in view of the situation in Syria apply

2012/C 139/08

The following information is brought to the attention of the persons and entities that appear in Annex I to Council Decision 2011/782/CFSP, as implemented by Council Implementing Decision 2012/256/CFSP (1), and in Annex II to Council Regulation (EU) No 36/2012, as implemented by Council Implementing Regulation (EU) No 410/2012 (2) concerning restrictive measures in view of the situation in Syria.

1

2

The Council of the European Union has decided that the persons and entities that appear in the above mentioned Annexes should be included in the list of persons and entities subject to restrictive measures provided for in Decision 2011/782/CFSP and in Regulation (EU) No 36/2012 concerning restrictive measures in view of the situation in Syria. The grounds for designations of those persons and entities appear in the relevant entries in those Annexes.

The attention of the persons and entities concerned is drawn to the possibility of making an application to the competent authorities of the relevant Member State(s) as indicated on the websites in Annex III to Regulation (EU) No 36/2012, in order to obtain an authorisation to use frozen funds for basic needs or specific payments (cf. Article 16 of the Regulation).

The persons and entities concerned may submit a request to the Council, together with supporting documentation, that the decision to include them on the above mentioned list should be reconsidered, to the following address:

| Council of the European Union |
| --- |
| General Secretariat |
| DG C Coordination Unit |
| Rue de la Loi/Wetstraat 175 |
| 1048 Bruxelles/Brussel |
| BELGIQUE/BELGIË |

Council of the European Union

General Secretariat

DG C Coordination Unit

Rue de la Loi/Wetstraat 175

1048 Bruxelles/Brussel

BELGIQUE/BELGIË

The attention of the persons and entities concerned is also drawn to the possibility of challenging the Council's decision before the General Court of the European Union, in accordance with the conditions laid down in Article 275, second paragraph, and Article 263, fourth and sixth paragraphs, of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union.

---

(1)  OJ L 126, 15.5.2012, p. 9.

1

(2)  OJ L 126, 15.5.2012, p. 3.

2

---
### SUBCHAPTER XXIV—AFRICAN DEVELOPMENT BANK
-       - Superintendent of Documents
      - 2023-09-01T21:40:13-0400
      - Government Publishing Office, Washington, DC 20401
      - Government Publishing Office
      - Government Publishing Office attests that this document has not been altered since it was disseminated by Government Publishing Office
#### Emilie Kuntz and Jacob Medicus, as Executors, etc., Respondents, v. Nils Peter Emil Peterson, Appellant, and Sarah M. Peterson, Defendant.

In place of the 2d paragraph of the order, it is ordered that appellant produce from time to time at the examination such competent ■writings as are relevant to the subject-matter, upon demand for and a description thereof; and the order as so modified is affirmed, without costs. Ho opinion. Jenks, P. J., Burr, Thomas, Carr and Putnam, JJ., concurred.
IIB 

114TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 4284 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

APRIL 20, 2016 

Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Small Business and 

Entrepreneurship 

AN ACT 

To require the Administrator of the Small Business Administration to issue regulations providing examples of a failure to comply in good faith with the requirements of 

prime contractors with respect to subcontracting plans. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 


asabaliauskas on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

HR 4284 RFS 

1 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

2 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Service Provider Op3 portunity Clarification Act of 2015’’. 

4 SEC. 2. GOOD FAITH COMPLIANCE WITH THE REQUIRE5 MENTS OF PRIME CONTRACTORS WITH RE6 SPECT TO SUBCONTRACTING PLANS. 

7 Not later than 270 days after the date of enactment 

8 of this Act, the Administrator of the Small Business Ad9 ministration shall issue regulations providing examples of 

10 activities that would be considered a failure to make a 

11 good faith effort to comply with the requirements imposed 

12 on an entity (other than a small business concern as de13 fined under section 3 of the Small Business Act (15 

14 U.S.C. 632)) that is awarded a prime contract containing 

15 the clauses required under paragraphs (4) or (5) of section 

16 8(d) of the Small Business Act (15 U.S.C. 637(d)). 

Passed the House of Representatives April 19, 2016. 

Attest: KAREN L. HAAS, 

Clerk. 


asabaliauskas on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
# C_2016468EN.01027801.xml

| 15.12.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 468/278 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

15.12.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 468/278

---

P7_TA(2013)0556

EU-France agreement concerning the application to the collectivity of Saint-Barthélemy of Union legislation on taxation *

European Parliament legislative resolution of 11 December 2013 on the proposal for a Council decision on the conclusion of an agreement between the European Union and the French Republic concerning the application to the collectivity of Saint-Barthélemy of Union legislation on the taxation of savings and administrative cooperation in the field of taxation (COM(2013)0555 — C7-0360/2013 — 2013/0269(NLE))

(Consultation)

(2016/C 468/58)

The European Parliament,

The European Parliament

| — | having regard to the proposal for a Council decision (COM(2013)0555), |
| --- | --- |

—

having regard to the proposal for a Council decision (COM(2013)0555),

| — | having regard to the draft agreement between the European Union and the French Republic concerning the application to the collectivity of Saint-Barthélemy of Union legislation on the taxation of savings and administrative cooperation in the field of taxation, |
| --- | --- |

—

having regard to the draft agreement between the European Union and the French Republic concerning the application to the collectivity of Saint-Barthélemy of Union legislation on the taxation of savings and administrative cooperation in the field of taxation,

| — | having regard to Articles 113 and 115, in conjunction with Article 218(6), second subparagraph, point (b) and Article 218(8), second paragraph of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, pursuant to which the Council consulted Parliament (C7-0360/2013), |
| --- | --- |

—

having regard to Articles 113 and 115, in conjunction with Article 218(6), second subparagraph, point (b) and Article 218(8), second paragraph of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, pursuant to which the Council consulted Parliament (C7-0360/2013),

| — | having regard to Rules 55, 90(7) and 46(1) of its Rules of Procedure, |
| --- | --- |

—

having regard to Rules 55, 90(7) and 46(1) of its Rules of Procedure,

| — | having regard to the report of the Committee on Economic and Monetary Affairs (A7-0404/2013), |
| --- | --- |

—

having regard to the report of the Committee on Economic and Monetary Affairs (A7-0404/2013),

| 1. | Approves the conclusion of the agreement; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Approves the conclusion of the agreement;

| 2. | Instructs its President to forward its position to the Council, the Commission and the governments and parliaments of the Member States. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Instructs its President to forward its position to the Council, the Commission and the governments and parliaments of the Member States.

---
1Pursuant to Local Rule 47.5, the Court has determined that this

opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under

the limited circumstances set forth in Local Rule 47.5.4.

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

For the Fifth Circuit

No. 95-41010

Summary Calendar

HAROLD FREDERICK KRUEGER,

Petitioner-Appellant,

VERSUS

W.F. WOODS,

Respondent-Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court

For the Southern District of Texas

(CR-C-95-494)

March 28, 1996

Before HIGGINBOTHAM, DUHÉ, and EMILIO M. GARZA, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:1

Appellant, a federal prisoner, sued pro se under 28 U.S.C. §

2241 alleging that legal materials, including a pro se motion under

28 U.S.C. § 2255, were wilfully confiscated from him and

negligently misplaced thereby obstructing his access to the courts

and rendering his continued incarceration unconstitutional. The

district court dismissed. We affirm.
2

Appellant’s legal materials were wilfully confiscated in

connection with his transfer from one institution to another.

Marshals took the legal papers from him and they were thereafter

inadvertently misplaced. 

We construe the dismissal as one pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §

1915(d) because Defendants were not served with the complaint prior

to dismissal. 

Appellant’s complaint does not challenge the legality of his

conviction or the validity of his sentence and he is, therefore,

not entitled to relief under § 2255. See United States v. Gabor,

905 F.2d 76, 77-78 (5th Cir. 1990). Claims which attack the manner

in which a sentence is executed are proper under § 2441. United

States v. Cleto, 956 F.2d 83, 84 (5th Cir. 1992). But relief under

this section is available only if custody is in violation of the

constitution or laws of the United States. Appellant has not shown

that he is in custody in violation of the constitution or laws of

the United States and, therefore, denial of relief under § 2241 was

appropriate.

The district court did not address Appellant’s claim that he

was denied access to the courts. Since he is a federal prisoner,

and the defendants are federal, not state actors, such claim could

be brought pursuant to Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of the

Federal Bureau of Narcotics, 403 U.S. 388 (1971). The flaw in

Appellant’s denial of access argument, however, is that, while

confiscation of the materials was willing, it was the inadvertent
3

loss of those materials which deprived him of access to the courts.

To constitute a constitutional deprivation the impairment of access

must be deliberate. Jackson v. Procunier, 789 F.2d 307, 310-11

(5th Cir. 1986). Accordingly, Appellant has failed to state a

claim for denial of access to the courts. 

AFFIRMED.
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.

, Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Marilyn Kelly

Stephen J. Markm an Diane M. Hathaway

Mary Beth Kelly

Brian K. Zahra

, Justices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

_________________________________________ Clerk July 24, 2012

s0716 

# Order

July 24, 2012

144172

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff

- Appellee,

v SC: 144172

COA: 302915

Oakland CC: 2006

- 206890

- FC

DENNIS ANTHONY HALL,

Defendant

- Appellant.

_________________________________________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the September 13, 2011

order of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because the defendant’s

motion for relief from judgment is prohibited by MCR 6.502(G).
§ 1002.292 What can the Attorney General do about the complaint? ( a ) If the Attorney General is reasonably satisfied that an individual's complaint is meritorious, meaning that he or she is entitled to the rights or benefits sought, the Attorney General may appear on his or her behalf and act as the individual's attorney, and initiate a legal action to obtain appropriate relief.
( b ) If the Attorney General determines that the individual's complaint does not have merit, the Attorney General may decline to represent him or her.
§ 402.60 Materials in field offices of the Office of Hearings and Appeals. ( a ) *Materials available for inspection.* The following materials are available for inspection in the field offices of the Office of Hearings and Appeals: ( 1 ) Regulations of the Social Security Administration (see § 402.55(a)(2)).
( 2 ) Title 5, United States Code.
( 3 ) Compilation of the Social Security Laws.
( 4 ) Social Security Rulings.
( 5 ) Social Security Handbook.
( 6 ) Social Security Acquiescence Rulings.
( b ) The Hearings, Appeals and Litigation Law (HALLEX) manual is available for inspection and copying in the field offices of the Office of Hearings and Appeals (fees may be applicable per §§ 402.155 through 402.185).
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM (A) THE
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OF TRANSGLOBE ENERGY CORPORATION FOR THE
FISCAL QUARTER ENDING DECEMBER 31, 1996 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY
REFERENCE TO SUCH.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          SEP-30-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             OCT-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1996
<CASH>                                       2,854,817
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  800,798
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             3,655,615
<PP&E>                                      18,156,099
<DEPRECIATION>                                  11,892
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              18,167,991
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          820,146
<BONDS>                                              0
<COMMON>                                    15,750,103
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                18,167,991
<SALES>                                        369,078
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               369,078
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               275,548
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                125,687
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            125,687
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   125,687
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.00
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.00
        

</TABLE>
**Exhibit 32.2**

 

**Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350,**

**As Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**

 

Inconnection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended November 30,2005 (the “Report”) of Immucor, Inc. (the “Registrant”), as filed with theSecurities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, I certify, to the bestof my knowledge, that:

 

(1)                                  TheReport fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) ofthe Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

 

(2)                                  Theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant.

 

 
| January 6, 2006 | /s/ Patrick D. Waddy    |   |
|----------------------|-------------------------|--------|
|                 | Patrick D. Waddy        |
|                 | Chief Financial Officer |

 

----
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-27-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JUN-29-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-20-1997
<CASH>                                         631,000
<SECURITIES>                                10,819,000
<RECEIVABLES>                                3,217,000
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                  2,173,000
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             7,424,000
<PP&E>                                      10,468,000
<DEPRECIATION>                             (6,326,000)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              21,828,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        2,329,000
<BONDS>                                      1,711,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       141,000
<OTHER-SE>                                  17,647,000
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                17,788,000
<SALES>                                      3,064,000
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             3,064,000
<CGS>                                        2,654,000
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                2,654,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             1,128,000
<LOSS-PROVISION>                             (718,000)
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             155,000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (563,000)
<INCOME-TAX>                                    52,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          (511,000)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (511,000)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.04)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

DAY ELEV

 1,001.17

 1,001.06

 1,001.13

 1,001.08

 1,001.00

 1,001.11

 1,001.95

 1,002.30

 1,002.51

 1,002.63

 1,002.73

 1,002.81

 1,002.81

 1,002.75

 1,002.74

 1,002.69

 1,002.79

 1,002.76

 1,002.72

 1,002.75

 1,002.75

 1,002.74

 1,002.73

 1,002.70

 1,002.72

 1,002.64

 1,002.60

 1,002.77

 1,002.91

 1,003.08

 2,854.1

 2,851.7

 2,853.2

 2,852.1

 2,850.3

 2,852.7

 2,871.1

 2,878.9

 2,883.5

 2,886.1

 2,888.3

 2,890.1

 2,890.1

 2,888.8

 2,888.5

 2,887.4

 2,889.6

 2,889.0

 2,888.1

 2,888.8

 2,888.8

 2,888.5

 2,888.3

 2,887.7

 2,888.1

 2,886.3

 2,885.5

 2,889.2

 2,892.3

 2,896.0

STORAGE

-1.3

-2.4

+1.5

-1.1

-1.8

+2.4

+18.4

+7.7

+4.6

+2.6

+2.2

+1.8

+0.0

-1.3

-0.2

-1.1

+2.2

-0.7

-0.9

+0.7

+0.0

-0.2

-0.2

-0.7

+0.4

-1.8

-0.9

+3.7

+3.1

+3.8

CHANGE

 4,250

 3,544

 5,768

 4,551

 3,852

 6,259

 14,086

 8,075

 5,044

 5,462

 5,306

 5,048

 4,075

 3,818

 4,192

 3,651

 5,397

 3,852

 3,980

 4,728

 4,207

 3,763

 4,016

 3,722

 4,167

 3,344

 3,720

 6,037

 5,796

 5,675

INFLOW

 4,854

 4,720

 4,937

 5,019

 4,685

 4,999

 4,768

 4,126

 2,660

 4,059

 4,163

 4,108

 4,036

 4,419

 4,264

 4,050

 4,215

 4,133

 4,294

 4,304

 4,162

 3,835

 4,082

 3,984

 3,939

 4,180

 4,093

 4,110

 4,202

 3,744

POWER

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

SPILL

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

OUTLET

 58

 39

 58

 84

 51

 45

 39

 65

 52

 71

 32

 52

 39

 65

 39

 156

 71

 52

 130

 91

 45

 39

 45

 71

 6

 52

 71

 39

 39

 39

C.F.S.

 .09

 .06

 .09

 .13

 .08

 .07

 .06

 .10

 .08

 .11

 .05

 .08

 .06

 .10

 .06

 .24

 .11

 .08

 .20

 .14

 .07

 .06

 .07

 .11

 .01

 .08

 .11

 .06

 .06

 .06

INCHES

 .00

 .04

 .00

 1.34

 .01

 .07

 3.10

 2.47

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .56

 .02

 .00

 .05

 1.86

 .01

PRECIP

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

NOVEMBER 2005 SHASTA LAKE DAILY OPERATIONS RUN DATE: March 14, 2006

IN LAKE

EVAPORATION

INCHES

C.F.S.

COMPUTED*

1000 ACRE-FEET

RELEASE - C.F.S.

RIVER

TOTALS +40.5 149,385 127,144 0 0 1,735 2.68 9.53

ACRE-FEET +40,500 296,305 252,190 0 0 3,441

COMMENTS:

* COMPUTED INFLOW IS THE SUM OF CHANGE IN STORAGE, RELEASES AND EVAPORATION.

SUMMARY

RELEASE (ACRE-FEET)

POWER 252,190

SPILL 0

OUTLET

TOTAL

 0

 252,190

PRECIPITATION

THIS MONTH =

TO DATE =

 9.53

JULY 1, 2005 10.47

 2,855.4

Table 3
**EXHIBIT31.1**

 

I, G. Ward Paxton, Chief Executive Officer ofIntrusion Inc., certify that:

 

(1)           I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form10-Q of Intrusion Inc.:

 

(2)           Based on my knowledge, this report does notcontain any untrue statement ofa material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make thestatements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements weremade, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

 

(3)           Based on my knowledge, the financial statements,and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in allmaterial respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flowsof the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

 

(4)           The registrant’s other certifying officer(s)and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls andprocedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for theregistrant and have:

 

(a)   Designed such disclosure controls andprocedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designedunder our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to theregistrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us byothers within those entities, particularly during the period in which thisreport is being prepared;

 

(b)   Evaluated the effectiveness of theregistrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this reportour conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls andprocedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on suchevaluation; and

 

(c)   Disclosed in this report any change in theregistrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during theregistrant’s most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or isreasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting; and

 

(5)           The registrant’s other certifying officer(s)and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal controlover financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committeeof the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalentfunctions):

 

(a)   All significant deficiencies and materialweaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financialreporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’sability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

 

(b)   Any fraud, whether or not material, that involvesmanagement or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’sinternal control over financial reporting.

 

 
| Date:  May 13, 2004 | /s/ G. Ward Paxton      |   |
|--------------------------|-------------------------|--------|
|                     | G. Ward Paxton          |
|                     | Chief Executive Officer |

 

1

----