alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Hon. Richard S. Morris. 

County Attorney 

Opinion No. O-3037. 

Armstrong County ,~ :

Rer Validity of maturity schedule 

Claude, Texas 

of bonds voted by the Claude Independent School District. 

Dear Sir: 

We are in rece$pt,of~your letter of January 8, requesting our opinion upon the question arising from,the following state of facts: 

“The Claude Independent School Ikstrict recently voted $14,000 in bonds for certain authorized 

purposes and the petition order of, election. aud 

notlce thereof set forth ihe’ following ,maturity 

schedule of such bonds: ‘To become due and payable 

serially $500.00 ten years from their date and $500.- 

00 each year thereafter up to and including the 

1961. and .$lOO.OO each year thereafter during the 

year 

years 1962 to 1970, both inclusive, ***ID 

Article 2786, of Vernon@s Annotated Civil Statutes, 

provides that bonds of independent school districts shall 

mature in serial annual Installments over a period of not exceeding forty years from their date. This department has 

heretofore construed this language of the statute to require 

all bonds voted by a school district to mature in serial annual 

Installments 

in one year h 

the first of which installments shall mature withrom the date of the issuance of such bonds and 

that for each year thereafter up to the final maturity 8ate a 

portion of the principal must be retired. Such has been the 

construction and rule of this department since the enactment of 

the statute. 

We, therefore, advise that we will be unable to approve bonds of Claude Independent School District providing a 

maturity schedule such as is outlined in your letter. Further9 

we are of the opinion that another election will be necessary 

for the reason that the statutes provide that whenever the proposition to issue bonds is to be voted on in any independent school 

district the petition, 

?A.netlv soeci 

election order and the notice of election 

must dls fe the amount of the bonds, the rate of 
Hon. Richard S.. Zorris, page 2 

interest, their maturity dates 

bonds are to be used. 

and the purpose for which the 

And for the Board of Trustees to attempt to Issue the bonds on a maturity schedule different from 

that contained in the petition, election order and notice of 

election, would, we think, be contrary to law. In other words, 

the bonds issued by the Board of Trustees would not be in conformity with the bonds authorized by the voters, without whose 

authorit the bonds could not be issued. 

Se&ion c 

See Article 2784, 

, Vernon's Annotated Civil Statutes. 

Yours very truly 

ATTORNEY GENERAL OF TEXAS 

B /s/ Clarence E. Crowe 

C P arence E. Crowe, Assistant 

APPROVED JAN 22, 1941 

/s/ Grover Sellers 

FIRST ASSISTANT ATTORNEY GENERAL 

~APPROVED: OPINION COMMITTEE 

BY: BWB, CHAIRMAN 

CEC:s:wb
#### § 404.901 Definitions.

As used in this subpart:

*Date you receive notice* means 5 days after the date on the notice, unless you show us that you did not receive it within the 5-day period.

*Decision* means the decision made by an administrative law judge or the Appeals Council.

*Determination* means the initial determination or the reconsidered determination.

*Preponderance of the evidence* means such relevant evidence that as a whole shows that the existence of the fact to be proven is more likely than not.

*Remand* means to return a case for further review.

*Substantial evidence* means such relevant evidence as a reasonable mind might accept as adequate to support a conclusion.

*Vacate* means to set aside a previous action.

*Waive* means to give up a right knowingly and voluntarily.

*We, us,* or *our* refers to the Social Security Administration.

*You* or *your* refers to any person claiming a right under the old age, disability, dependents' or survivors' benefits program.

[45 FR 52081, Aug. 5, 1980, as amended at 73 FR 76943, Dec. 18, 2008]
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          APR-30-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             MAY-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               JAN-31-1998
<CASH>                                         346,298
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                2,189,171
<ALLOWANCES>                                   189,637
<INVENTORY>                                  2,102,655
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             6,190,040
<PP&E>                                       5,896,528
<DEPRECIATION>                               1,669,522
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              10,441,794
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        3,633,500
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        10,140
<OTHER-SE>                                   2,077,831
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                10,441,794
<SALES>                                     15,835,253
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            15,835,253
<CGS>                                       13,152,697
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               15,141,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             271,526
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                422,727
<INCOME-TAX>                                    13,046
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            409,681
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   409,681
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .40
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
#### In the Matter of the Estate of Frank Maischoss, Deceased. Eugene W. Maischoss, Individually and as Surviving, Executor, etc., Appellant; Emma M. Maischoss and Another, Respondents.

Decree of Surrogate’s Court affirmed, with costs. All concurred.
```

[Federal Register Volume 78, Number 147 (Wednesday, July 31, 2013)]
[Notices]
[Page 46312]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2013-18428]

========================================================================
Notices
                                                Federal Register
________________________________________________________________________

This section of the FEDERAL REGISTER contains documents other than rules 
or proposed rules that are applicable to the public. Notices of hearings 
and investigations, committee meetings, agency decisions and rulings, 
delegations of authority, filing of petitions and applications and agency 
statements of organization and functions are examples of documents 
appearing in this section.

========================================================================


Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 147 / Wednesday, July 31, 2013 / 
Notices

[[Page 46312]]

AFRICAN DEVELOPMENT FOUNDATION

Board of Directors Executive Session Meeting

    Meeting: African Development Foundation, Board of Directors 
Executive Session Meeting
    Time: Tuesday, August 6, 2013 8:30 a.m. to 1:00 p.m.
    Place: 1400 Eye Street, NW., Suite 1000, Washington, DC 20005
    Date: Tuesday, August 6, 2013

Status

1. Open session, Tuesday, August 6, 2013, 8:30 a.m. to 12:00 p.m.
2. Closed session, Tuesday, August 6, 2013, 12:00 p.m. to 1:00 p.m.

Doris Mason Martin,
General Counsel, acting on behalf of the President/CEO, USADF.
[FR Doc. 2013-18428 Filed 7-30-13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE P
```
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY HIGH

 239

 256

 245

 232

 217

 240

 231

 217

 216

 209

 210

 212

 198

 206

 223

 195

 197

 180

 170

 167

 159

 146

 148

 150

 154

 159

 158

 210

 197

 191

 168

 179

 183

 189

 195

 198

 193

 183

 182

 193

 191

 191

 179

 181

 176

 171

 178

 143

 103

 92

 104

 107

 117

 111

 114

 113

 108

 120

 121

 119

 121

 119

 196

 207

 211

 210

 207

 203

 202

 201

 203

 202

 199

 197

 192

 190

 193

 186

 176

 143

 129

 133

 131

 129

 127

 129

 134

 135

 135

 150

 165

 164

 146

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

MARCH 2012 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: May 18, 2012

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

RIO VISTA ON THE SACRAMENTO RIVER
#### George W. Ling, Respondent, v. International Railway Company, Appellant.

Order of Special Term reversed and judgment of City Court reinstated, with costs to the appellant in this court and at Special Term. All concurred.
###### Editorial Note on Part 416

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 416 appear at 68 FR 53509, Sept. 11, 2003.

#### § 416.1705 Definitions.

As used in this subpart—

*Vocational rehabilitation services* refers to services provided blind or disabled persons under the State plan approved under the Rehabilitation Act of 1973 (see 45 CFR 401.120ff for requirements of these State plans).

*We* or *us* refers to either the Social Security Administration or the State agency making the disability or blindness determination.

*You* or *your* refers to the person who applies for or receives benefits or the person for whom an application is filed.
Exhibit 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

                           18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS

                         ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906

                        OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

      Pursuant to 18 U.S.C.ss.1350, as adopted pursuant to ss.906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned officer of John Hancock Financial
Services, Inc. (the "Company"), hereby certifies, to his knowledge, that:

      (1) the Company's quarterly report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended
June 30, 2003, (the "Report") fully complies with the requirements of Section
13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      (2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company as of and for the periods presented in the Report.

Dated: August 6, 2003                          /s/ DAVID F. D'ALESSANDRO
                                               -------------------------
                                         Name:  David F. D'Alessandro
                                         Title: Chairman of the Board and
                                                Chief Executive Officer

      A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has
been provided to John Hancock Financial Services, Inc. and will be retained by
John Hancock Financial Services, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and
Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

      It is intended that this Exhibit be treated as, and deemed to be,
"accompanying" this quarterly report on form 10-Q, and not "filed" as part of
the report.
###### Editorial Note on Part 416

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 416 appear at 68 FR 53509, Sept. 11, 2003.

#### § 416.660 Transfer of accumulated benefit payments.

A representative payee who has conserved or invested benefit payments shall transfer these funds and the interest earned from the invested funds to either a successor payee, to the beneficiary, or to us, as we will specify. If the funds and the earned interest are returned to us, we will recertify them to a successor representative payee or to the beneficiary.

[47 FR 30475, July 14, 1982, as amended at 75 FR 7552, Feb. 22, 2010]
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-24-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             SEP-19-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-11-1999
<CASH>                                         697,000
<SECURITIES>                                 6,490,000
<RECEIVABLES>                                5,436,000
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                  7,517,000
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            14,564,000
<PP&E>                                      14,382,000
<DEPRECIATION>                             (9,666,000)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              27,137,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        5,855,000
<BONDS>                                      1,931,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       156,000
<OTHER-SE>                                  26,981,000
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                27,137,000
<SALES>                                      8,701,000
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             8,701,000
<CGS>                                        6,383,000
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                6,383,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             2,280,000
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              21,000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 59,000
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             59,000
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    59,000
<EPS-BASIC>                                          0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0


</TABLE>
### §284v. Fifteenth replenishment

(a) The United States Governor of the International Development Association is authorized to contribute on behalf of the United States $3,705,000,000 to the fifteenth replenishment of the resources of the Association, subject to obtaining the necessary appropriations.

(b) In order to pay for the United States contribution provided for in subsection (a), there are authorized to be appropriated, without fiscal year limitation, $3,705,000,000 for payment by the Secretary of the Treasury.

(Pub. L. 86–565, §24, as added Pub. L. 111–32, title XI, §1109(a), June 24, 2009, 123 Stat. 1901.)
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS FINANCIAL DATA SCHEDULE IS INCLUDED IN THIS FORM 10-Q IN COMPLIANCE WITH
THE COMMISION'S RULES RELATING TO THE EDGAR FILING PROCESS.  THIS SCHEDULE
CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE CONSOLIDATED BALANCE
SHEET AS OF MARCH 31, 1998 AND THE CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS DATED AS
OF THE NINE MONTH PERIOD ENDED MARCH 31, 1998 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY
BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND ACCOMPANYING NOTES.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JUL-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1998
<CASH>                                       1,930,000
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                               20,397,000
<ALLOWANCES>                                   791,000
<INVENTORY>                                  7,662,000
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            30,837,000
<PP&E>                                       2,282,000<F1>
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0<F1>
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              35,850,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       13,560,000
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                    52,343,000
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                35,850,000
<SALES>                                     24,691,000
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            57,605,000
<CGS>                                       11,971,000
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               57,498,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0<F2>
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0<F2>
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0<F2>
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 77,000<F3>
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             77,000
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    77,000
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.00
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.00
<FN>
<F1>PROPERTY, PLANT AND EQUIPMENT IS SHOWN NET OF ACCUMULATED DEPRECITTION.
<F2>NOT SHOWN SEPERATELY WHEN REPORTING FROM 10-Q
<F3>INCLUDES EQUITY INTEREST IN JOINT VENTURE NET OF TAX
</FN>
        

</TABLE>
Exhibit 10.37 AMENDMENT
NUMBER THREE
TO THE
NEW YORK STOCK EXCHANGE, INC.
CAPITAL ACCUMULATION PLAN WHEREAS, New York Stock Exchange, Inc. (NYSE)
maintains the New York Stock Exchange, Inc. Capital Accumulation Plan,
effective January 1, 1998 (the Plan). WHEREAS, NYSE may amend the Plan by action of
its board of directors (the Board) or a person designated by the Board; and WHEREAS, the Board desires to freeze the Plan
effective as of January 1, 2004. NOW,
THEREFORE,
pursuant to Section 16 of the Plan, the Plan is hereby amended, effective as of
January 1, 2004, as follows: 1.             Section 1(o) is amended by adding
the following sentence at the end thereof: Notwithstanding any
contrary provision contained herein, no person shall be designated as, or shall
become, a Participant in this Plan on or after January 1, 2004. 2.             Section 2(a) is amended by adding
the following language at the end thereof: Notwithstanding any other
provision of the Plan to the contrary, the Plan is frozen, effective as of
January 1, 2004, and no book entry contribution shall be made or credited
pursuant to this Section 2(a) to any Accumulation Account with respect to
amounts earned for services performed after December 31, 2003.


IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has caused this Amendment to be
executed this 7th day of October, 2004. NEW YORK STOCK
  EXCHANGE, INC.By:
  /s/ DALE B.
  BERNSTEINDated:
  10/7/04  -2-
No. 11,885.

#### Largo *v.*Industrial Commission, et al.

Decided September 19, 1927.

Proceeding under the workmen’s compensation act. Judgment for claimant.

*Affirmed.*

1. Workmen’s *Compensation*— Dependency. Claimant’s deceased son .gave her his pay cheek and she supported him; another son paid her $30 a month "as board.” Under these facts, a finding of the commission that claimant and her minor daughter were 50 per cent dependent upon deceased, is upheld on review.

*342
      *Error to the District Court of Boulder County, Hon. Robert G. Smith, Judge.*

Mr. Edward Akfolter, for plaintiff: in error.

Mr. William L. Boatright, Attorney General, Mr. Otto Friedrichs, Assistant, Mr. Frank C. West, for defendants in error.

*Department One.*

Mr. Justice Denison

delivered the opinion of the court.

The Industrial Commission awarded plaintiff in error one-half compensation for the death of her son Dominic, the district court affirmed the award and she brings error.

She claims full compensation because she claims she was wholly dependent on him for support. Whether she was so is the only question in the case. Dominic was 26 and another son, Antonio, who also lived with her, was 24 years old.

The findings pertinent to the present questions were that “Dominic.Largo, the decedent, turned his pay check over to his mother and she paid for his board, room, clothing and other necessities and furnished him with spending money. Antonio paid $30 a-month, as board,” and that the claimant and her minor daughter “were dependent on decedent, to an extent, equivalent to fifty per cent of total dependency.”

The argument of plaintiff in error is that the words “as board” conclusively show that Antonio was not contributing to the support of his mother and minor sister and hence Dominic was their sole support and that therefore the award is not supported by the findings. C. L. § 4364.

We cannot agree with such conclusion. It is possible and indeed probable that Antonio’s payment of board *343was his method of contribution to the support of those to support whom it was as much his duty as Dominic’s. Suppose Dominic also had paid hoard to his mother as his method of supporting her, could the commission have said that she was not dependent on him at all, or if in such case they had found her dependent fifty per cent and awarded her one-half compensation, could the courts have said that the award was wrong?

Judgment affirmed.

Mr. Chiee Justice Burke, Mr. Justice Whiteord and Mr. Justice Sheaeor concur.
#### § 438.405 Penalty procedures.

We will impose and collect civil penalties pursuant to the provisions of the Program Fraud and Civil Remedies Act, 31 U.S.C. sections 3803 (except subsection (c)), 3804, 3805, 3806, 3807, 3808, and 3812, to the extent these provisions are not inconsistent with the requirements in this part.