# C_2016468EN.01040401.xml

| 15.12.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 468/404 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

15.12.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 468/404

---

P7_TA(2013)0590

Union action for the ‘European Capitals of Culture’ for the years 2020 to 2033 ***I

European Parliament legislative resolution of 12 December 2013 on the proposal for a decision of the European Parliament and of the Council establishing a Union action for the European Capitals of Culture for the years 2020 to 2033 (COM(2012)0407 — C7-0198/2012 — 2012/0199(COD))

(Ordinary legislative procedure: first reading)

(2016/C 468/84)

The European Parliament,

The European Parliament

| — | having regard to the Commission proposal to Parliament and the Council (COM(2012)0407), |
| --- | --- |

—

having regard to the Commission proposal to Parliament and the Council (COM(2012)0407),

| — | having regard to Article 294(2) and Article 167(5) of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, pursuant to which the Commission submitted the proposal to Parliament (C7-0198/2012), |
| --- | --- |

—

having regard to Article 294(2) and Article 167(5) of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, pursuant to which the Commission submitted the proposal to Parliament (C7-0198/2012),

| — | having regard to Article 294(3) of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, |
| --- | --- |

—

having regard to Article 294(3) of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union,

| — | having regard to the opinions of the Committee of the Regions of 15 February 2012 (1) and 30 November 2012 (2), |
| --- | --- |

—

having regard to the opinions of the Committee of the Regions of 15 February 2012 (1) and 30 November 2012 (2),

1

2

| — | having regard to Rule 55 of its Rules of Procedure, |
| --- | --- |

—

having regard to Rule 55 of its Rules of Procedure,

| — | having regard to the report of the Committee on Culture and Education (A7-0226/2013), |
| --- | --- |

—

having regard to the report of the Committee on Culture and Education (A7-0226/2013),

| 1. | Adopts its position at first reading hereinafter set out; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Adopts its position at first reading hereinafter set out;

| 2. | Calls on the Commission to refer the matter to Parliament again if it intends to amend its proposal substantially or replace it with another text; |
| --- | --- |

2.

Calls on the Commission to refer the matter to Parliament again if it intends to amend its proposal substantially or replace it with another text;

| 3. | Instructs its President to forward its position to the Council, the Commission and the national parliaments. |
| --- | --- |

3.

Instructs its President to forward its position to the Council, the Commission and the national parliaments.

---

(1)  OJ C 113, 18.4.2012, p. 17.

1

(2)  OJ C 17, 19.1.2013, p. 97.

2

---

P7_TC1-COD(2012)0199

Position of the European Parliament adopted at first reading on 12 December 2013 with a view to the adoption of Decision No .../2014/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council establishing a Union action for the European Capitals of Culture for the years 2020 to 2033 and repealing Decision No 1622/2006/EC

[Amendment 84 (*1)]

THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT AND THE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION,

Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, and in particular the first indent of Article 167(5) thereof,

Having regard to the proposal from the European Commission,

After transmission of the draft legislative act to the national parliaments,

Having regard to the opinions of the Committee of the Regions (1),

Acting in accordance with the ordinary legislative procedure (2),

Whereas:

| (1) | The Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (TFEU) aims at an ever closer union among the peoples of Europe and confers on the Union the task, inter alia, of contributing to the flowering of the cultures of the Member States, while respecting their national and regional diversity and at the same time bringing the common cultural heritage to the fore. In this respect, the Union, where necessary, supports and supplements Member States' action to improve the knowledge and dissemination of the culture and history of the European peoples. |
| --- | --- |

(1)

The Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (TFEU) aims at an ever closer union among the peoples of Europe and confers on the Union the task, inter alia, of contributing to the flowering of the cultures of the Member States, while respecting their national and regional diversity and at the same time bringing the common cultural heritage to the fore. In this respect, the Union, where necessary, supports and supplements Member States' action to improve the knowledge and dissemination of the culture and history of the European peoples.

| (2) | The
  Commission's
  communication ▌on a European agenda for culture in a globalizing world ▌, endorsed by the Council in
  a
  resolution of 16 November 2007 ▌ (3)

  and by the


  European Parliament in its resolution of 10 April 2008

   (4), sets the objectives for future activities of the Union in the field of culture. These activities should promote cultural diversity and intercultural dialogue. They should also promote culture as a catalyst for creativity within the framework of growth and jobs, as well as a vital element in the Union's international relations. |
| --- | --- |

(2)

The
  Commission's
  communication ▌on a European agenda for culture in a globalizing world ▌, endorsed by the Council in
  a
  resolution of 16 November 2007 ▌ (3)

  and by the


  European Parliament in its resolution of 10 April 2008

   (4), sets the objectives for future activities of the Union in the field of culture. These activities should promote cultural diversity and intercultural dialogue. They should also promote culture as a catalyst for creativity within the framework of growth and jobs, as well as a vital element in the Union's international relations.

| (

  2a) | The UNESCO Convention on the Protection and Promotion of the Diversity of Cultural Expressions, which entered into force on 18 March 2007 and to which the Union is a party, aims at protecting and promoting cultural diversity, fostering interculturality and raising awareness of the value of cultural diversity at local, national and international levels. |
| --- | --- |

(

  2a)

The UNESCO Convention on the Protection and Promotion of the Diversity of Cultural Expressions, which entered into force on 18 March 2007 and to which the Union is a party, aims at protecting and promoting cultural diversity, fostering interculturality and raising awareness of the value of cultural diversity at local, national and international levels.

| (3) | Decision No 1622/2006/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council (5) ▌established a Community action for the European Capital of Culture event for the years 2007 to 2019. |
| --- | --- |

(3)

Decision No 1622/2006/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council (5) ▌established a Community action for the European Capital of Culture event for the years 2007 to 2019.

| (4) | The evaluations of the European Capitals of Culture as well as the public consultation on the future of the action after 2019 reveal that the Capitals have progressively become one of the most ambitious cultural initiatives in Europe as well as one of the most appreciated by European citizens. |
| --- | --- |

(4)

The evaluations of the European Capitals of Culture as well as the public consultation on the future of the action after 2019 reveal that the Capitals have progressively become one of the most ambitious cultural initiatives in Europe as well as one of the most appreciated by European citizens.

| (5) | In addition to the original objectives of the European Capitals of Culture, which were to highlight the richness and diversity of European cultures and the features they share and to promote greater mutual understanding between European citizens, cities holding the title have also progressively added a new dimension by using the leverage effect of the title to stimulate the city's more general development
  in accordance with their respective strategies and


  priorities
  . |
| --- | --- |

(5)

In addition to the original objectives of the European Capitals of Culture, which were to highlight the richness and diversity of European cultures and the features they share and to promote greater mutual understanding between European citizens, cities holding the title have also progressively added a new dimension by using the leverage effect of the title to stimulate the city's more general development
  in accordance with their respective strategies and


  priorities
  .

| (6) | The
  objectives
  of the European Capitals of Culture action
  are fully in line with the objectives of the Creative Europe Programme established by Regulation (EU) No 1295/2013 of the European Parliament and of the Council (6) which aims to
  safeguard,


  develop and
  promote European cultural and linguistic diversity
  , to promote Europe's cultural heritage
  and to strengthen the competitiveness of the
  European
  cultural and creative sectors
  , in particular of the audio-visual sector
  , with a view to supporting smart, sustainable and inclusive growth.
  They also help to strengthen the feeling of belonging to a common cultural area, and stimulate intercultural dialogue and mutual understanding. |
| --- | --- |

(6)

The
  objectives
  of the European Capitals of Culture action
  are fully in line with the objectives of the Creative Europe Programme established by Regulation (EU) No 1295/2013 of the European Parliament and of the Council (6) which aims to
  safeguard,


  develop and
  promote European cultural and linguistic diversity
  , to promote Europe's cultural heritage
  and to strengthen the competitiveness of the
  European
  cultural and creative sectors
  , in particular of the audio-visual sector
  , with a view to supporting smart, sustainable and inclusive growth.
  They also help to strengthen the feeling of belonging to a common cultural area, and stimulate intercultural dialogue and mutual understanding.

| (6a) | To achieve those objectives, it is important for the cities holding the title to seek to develop links between, on the one hand, their cultural and creative sectors, and, on the other hand, sectors such as education, research, environment, urban development or cultural tourism. In particular, past evidence show the potential of European Capitals of Culture in acting as a catalyst for local development and cultural tourism as highlighted in the Commission's Communication of 30 June 2010 entitled ‘Europe, the world's No 1 tourist destination — a new political framework for tourism in Europe’, welcomed by the Council in its conclusions of 12 October 2010

   (7)

  and endorsed by the European Parliament in its resolution of 27 September 2011

   (8). |
| --- | --- |

(6a)

To achieve those objectives, it is important for the cities holding the title to seek to develop links between, on the one hand, their cultural and creative sectors, and, on the other hand, sectors such as education, research, environment, urban development or cultural tourism. In particular, past evidence show the potential of European Capitals of Culture in acting as a catalyst for local development and cultural tourism as highlighted in the Commission's Communication of 30 June 2010 entitled ‘Europe, the world's No 1 tourist destination — a new political framework for tourism in Europe’, welcomed by the Council in its conclusions of 12 October 2010

   (7)

  and endorsed by the European Parliament in its resolution of 27 September 2011

   (8).

| (6b) | It is also important for cities holding the title to seek to promote social inclusion and equal opportunities and do their utmost to ensure the broadest possible involvement of all the components of civil society in the preparation and implementation of the cultural programme, with special attention being paid to marginalised and disadvantaged groups. |
| --- | --- |

(6b)

It is also important for cities holding the title to seek to promote social inclusion and equal opportunities and do their utmost to ensure the broadest possible involvement of all the components of civil society in the preparation and implementation of the cultural programme, with special attention being paid to marginalised and disadvantaged groups.

| (7) | The evaluations and the public consultation have
  convincingly shown
  that the European Capitals of Culture have many potential benefits when they are
  carefully
  planned ▌. They remain first and foremost a cultural initiative, but they can also
  bring
  significant social and economic benefits, particularly when they are embedded
  within
  a long-term
  culture-led
  development strategy in the city concerned. |
| --- | --- |

(7)

The evaluations and the public consultation have
  convincingly shown
  that the European Capitals of Culture have many potential benefits when they are
  carefully
  planned ▌. They remain first and foremost a cultural initiative, but they can also
  bring
  significant social and economic benefits, particularly when they are embedded
  within
  a long-term
  culture-led
  development strategy in the city concerned.

| (8) | The European Capitals of Culture
  action is
  also highly challenging. Staging a year-long programme of cultural activities is demanding and some
  European
  Capitals
  of Culture
  have been more successful than others in capitalising on the potential. Therefore, the action should be reinforced in order to help all cities to make the most of the title. |
| --- | --- |

(8)

The European Capitals of Culture
  action is
  also highly challenging. Staging a year-long programme of cultural activities is demanding and some
  European
  Capitals
  of Culture
  have been more successful than others in capitalising on the potential. Therefore, the action should be reinforced in order to help all cities to make the most of the title.

| (9) | The European Capital of Culture title should continue to be reserved to cities,
  irrespective of their size,
  but in order to reach a wider public and amplify the impacts,
  those
  cities should also continue to have the possibility of involving their surrounding
  area
  . |
| --- | --- |

(9)

The European Capital of Culture title should continue to be reserved to cities,
  irrespective of their size,
  but in order to reach a wider public and amplify the impacts,
  those
  cities should also continue to have the possibility of involving their surrounding
  area
  .

| (10) | The award of the title of European Capital of Culture should continue to be based on a cultural programme created specifically for the European Capital of Culture ▌, which should have a ▌strong European dimension
  . The
  programme
  should


  also
  be part of a longer-term strategy
  with a sustainable impact on the development of the local economic, cultural and social environment
  . |
| --- | --- |

(10)

The award of the title of European Capital of Culture should continue to be based on a cultural programme created specifically for the European Capital of Culture ▌, which should have a ▌strong European dimension
  . The
  programme
  should


  also
  be part of a longer-term strategy
  with a sustainable impact on the development of the local economic, cultural and social environment
  .

| (11) | The two-stage selection process based on a chronological list of Member States and carried out by a ▌panel of independent experts
  (the ‘panel’)
  has proven to be fair and transparent. It has enabled cities to improve their applications between the pre-selection and the final selection phase on the basis of expert advice received from the panel, and has ensured an equitable distribution of
  European
  Capitals
  of Culture
  across all Member States.
  Furthermore, to safeguard the continuity of the action and avoid the loss of experience and know-how which would result from all members being replaced simultaneously, the replacement of panel members should be staggered. |
| --- | --- |

(11)

The two-stage selection process based on a chronological list of Member States and carried out by a ▌panel of independent experts
  (the ‘panel’)
  has proven to be fair and transparent. It has enabled cities to improve their applications between the pre-selection and the final selection phase on the basis of expert advice received from the panel, and has ensured an equitable distribution of
  European
  Capitals
  of Culture
  across all Member States.
  Furthermore, to safeguard the continuity of the action and avoid the loss of experience and know-how which would result from all members being replaced simultaneously, the replacement of panel members should be staggered.

| (11a) | National expertise should continue to be ensured by allowing the Member States to appoint up to two experts to the panel responsible for the selection and monitoring of cities. |
| --- | --- |

(11a)

National expertise should continue to be ensured by allowing the Member States to appoint up to two experts to the panel responsible for the selection and monitoring of cities.

| (12) | The selection criteria should be
  made
  more explicit in order to give
  better
  guidance to the candidate cities
  regarding the objectives and requirements they need to comply with in order to obtain the title of European Capital of Culture. The selection criteria should also be easier to measure
  in order to help the panel ▌in the selection and monitoring of cities. ▌ In
  this regard, there should be a
  particular
  focus on the candidate cities’ plans for
  legacy
  activities embedded in
  a long-term cultural policy strategy
  , which can generate a sustainable cultural, economic and social impact
  . |
| --- | --- |

(12)

The selection criteria should be
  made
  more explicit in order to give
  better
  guidance to the candidate cities
  regarding the objectives and requirements they need to comply with in order to obtain the title of European Capital of Culture. The selection criteria should also be easier to measure
  in order to help the panel ▌in the selection and monitoring of cities. ▌ In
  this regard, there should be a
  particular
  focus on the candidate cities’ plans for
  legacy
  activities embedded in
  a long-term cultural policy strategy
  , which can generate a sustainable cultural, economic and social impact
  .

| (13) | The preparation phase between the designation of a city and the year of the title is of crucial importance for the success of a European Capital of Culture. There is
  a broad
  consensus among stakeholders that the accompanying measures introduced by Decision No 1622/2006/EC have been very useful for the cities. Those measures should be further developed, in particular through more frequent monitoring meetings and visits to the cities by panel members, and through an even stronger exchange of experience between past, present and future
  European
  Capitals
  of Culture
  , as well as candidate cities.
  Designated cities may also develop further links with other European Capitals of Culture. |
| --- | --- |

(13)

The preparation phase between the designation of a city and the year of the title is of crucial importance for the success of a European Capital of Culture. There is
  a broad
  consensus among stakeholders that the accompanying measures introduced by Decision No 1622/2006/EC have been very useful for the cities. Those measures should be further developed, in particular through more frequent monitoring meetings and visits to the cities by panel members, and through an even stronger exchange of experience between past, present and future
  European
  Capitals
  of Culture
  , as well as candidate cities.
  Designated cities may also develop further links with other European Capitals of Culture.

| (14) | The Melina Mercouri Prize has acquired a strong symbolic value which goes far beyond the actual amount of the prize which may be awarded by the Commission. However, in order to ensure that the designated cities fulfil their commitments, the conditions for payment of the prize should be made more stringent and explicit. |
| --- | --- |

(14)

The Melina Mercouri Prize has acquired a strong symbolic value which goes far beyond the actual amount of the prize which may be awarded by the Commission. However, in order to ensure that the designated cities fulfil their commitments, the conditions for payment of the prize should be made more stringent and explicit.

| (14a) | Candidate cities should explore the possibility, where appropriate, of seeking financial support from Union programmes and funds. |
| --- | --- |

(14a)

Candidate cities should explore the possibility, where appropriate, of seeking financial support from Union programmes and funds.

| (15) | It is important that the cities concerned make clear in all their communication material that the European Capitals of Culture
  is an action
  of the Union. |
| --- | --- |

(15)

It is important that the cities concerned make clear in all their communication material that the European Capitals of Culture
  is an action
  of the Union.

| (16) | The Commission’s evaluations of the results of past European Capitals of Culture cannot provide primary data on the impact of the title and are based on data collected at a local level. Therefore, the cities themselves should be the key players in the evaluation process and should put in place effective measurement mechanisms. |
| --- | --- |

(16)

The Commission’s evaluations of the results of past European Capitals of Culture cannot provide primary data on the impact of the title and are based on data collected at a local level. Therefore, the cities themselves should be the key players in the evaluation process and should put in place effective measurement mechanisms.

| (17) | Past
  experience ▌has shown that the participation of candidate countries can
  help
  to bring them closer to the Union by highlighting the common aspects of European cultures. The European Capitals of Culture should, therefore, be open again to the participation of candidate and potential candidate countries after 2019. |
| --- | --- |

(17)

Past
  experience ▌has shown that the participation of candidate countries can
  help
  to bring them closer to the Union by highlighting the common aspects of European cultures. The European Capitals of Culture should, therefore, be open again to the participation of candidate and potential candidate countries after 2019.

| (17a) | However, for reasons of equity with the cities in the Member States, every city in candidate and potential candidate countries should only be allowed to participate in one competition during the period from 2020 to 2033. Furthermore, also for reasons of equity with Member States, each candidate country or potential candidate country should only be allowed to host the title once during the period from 2020 to 2033. Therefore, cities from those candidate and potential candidate countries which have already been awarded the title during the period covered by this Decision should not be allowed to participate in the subsequent competitions during that same period. |
| --- | --- |

(17a)

However, for reasons of equity with the cities in the Member States, every city in candidate and potential candidate countries should only be allowed to participate in one competition during the period from 2020 to 2033. Furthermore, also for reasons of equity with Member States, each candidate country or potential candidate country should only be allowed to host the title once during the period from 2020 to 2033. Therefore, cities from those candidate and potential candidate countries which have already been awarded the title during the period covered by this Decision should not be allowed to participate in the subsequent competitions during that same period.

| (18) | In order to ensure uniform conditions for the implementation of this Decision and, in particular, the provisions concerning the designation of the European Capitals of Culture, implementing powers should be conferred on the Commission. |
| --- | --- |

(18)

In order to ensure uniform conditions for the implementation of this Decision and, in particular, the provisions concerning the designation of the European Capitals of Culture, implementing powers should be conferred on the Commission.

| (19) | Decision
  No
  1622/2006/EC should be repealed and replaced by this Decision. Its provisions should, however, continue to apply for all the European Capitals of Culture up to 2019 which were already designated or are in the process of being designated. |
| --- | --- |

(19)

Decision
  No
  1622/2006/EC should be repealed and replaced by this Decision. Its provisions should, however, continue to apply for all the European Capitals of Culture up to 2019 which were already designated or are in the process of being designated.

| (20) | Since the objectives of this Decision,
  namely to safeguard and promote the diversity of cultures in Europe, to highlight the common features they share and to foster the contribution of culture to the long-term development of cities,
  cannot be sufficiently achieved by the Member States
  given
  the need, in particular, for common, clear and transparent criteria and procedures for the selection and the monitoring of the European Capitals of Culture, as well as for a strong coordination between the Member States, but can rather,
  by reason of the scale and the expected effects of the action
  , be better achieved at Union level, the Union may adopt measures in accordance with the principle of subsidiarity as set out in
  Article
  5 of the Treaty on European Union. In accordance with the principle of proportionality, as set out in that
  Article
  , this Decision does not go beyond what is necessary in order to achieve those objectives, |
| --- | --- |

(20)

Since the objectives of this Decision,
  namely to safeguard and promote the diversity of cultures in Europe, to highlight the common features they share and to foster the contribution of culture to the long-term development of cities,
  cannot be sufficiently achieved by the Member States
  given
  the need, in particular, for common, clear and transparent criteria and procedures for the selection and the monitoring of the European Capitals of Culture, as well as for a strong coordination between the Member States, but can rather,
  by reason of the scale and the expected effects of the action
  , be better achieved at Union level, the Union may adopt measures in accordance with the principle of subsidiarity as set out in
  Article
  5 of the Treaty on European Union. In accordance with the principle of proportionality, as set out in that
  Article
  , this Decision does not go beyond what is necessary in order to achieve those objectives,

HAVE ADOPTED THIS DECISION:

Article 1

Establishment

▌A Union action
  entitled
  ‘European Capitals of Culture
  ’ (the ‘action’) is hereby established
  for the years 2020 to 2033.

Article 2

Objectives

1.   The general objectives of the action shall be the following:

| (a) | to safeguard and promote the diversity of
  cultures in Europe
  and to highlight the common features they share,
  as well as to increase citizens’ sense of belonging to a common cultural space
  ; |
| --- | --- |

(a)

to safeguard and promote the diversity of
  cultures in Europe
  and to highlight the common features they share,
  as well as to increase citizens’ sense of belonging to a common cultural space
  ;

| (b) | to foster the contribution of culture to the long-term development of cities
  in accordance with their respective strategies and priorities
  . |
| --- | --- |

(b)

to foster the contribution of culture to the long-term development of cities
  in accordance with their respective strategies and priorities
  .

2.   The specific objectives of the action shall be the following:

| (a) | to enhance the range, diversity and European dimension of the cultural
  offering
  in cities, including through transnational cooperation; |
| --- | --- |

(a)

to enhance the range, diversity and European dimension of the cultural
  offering
  in cities, including through transnational cooperation;

| (b) | to widen access to and participation in culture; |
| --- | --- |

(b)

to widen access to and participation in culture;

| (c) | to strengthen the capacity of the cultural sector and its
  links
  with other sectors; |
| --- | --- |

(c)

to strengthen the capacity of the cultural sector and its
  links
  with other sectors;

| (d) | to
  raise
  the international profile of cities through culture. |
| --- | --- |

(d)

to
  raise
  the international profile of cities through culture.

Article 3

Access to the action

-1.
     
  The competition for the European Capital of Culture title shall only be open to cities, which may involve their surrounding areas.

-1a.
     
  The number of European Capitals of Culture in a given year (the ‘year of the title’) shall not exceed three.

The designation shall apply each year to a maximum of one city in each of the two Member States appearing in the calendar set out in the Annex (the ‘calendar’) and, in the relevant years, to one city from candidate and potential candidate countries or to one city from a country that accedes to the Union in the circumstances set out in paragraph 3a.

1.   Cities in Member States shall be entitled to be designated as European Capitals of Culture for one year
  in accordance with the calendar
  .

▌

▌

3.   Cities in candidate and potential candidate countries
  which participate in the Creative Europe Programme or in the subsequent Union programmes supporting culture at the date of the publication of the call for submission of applications referred to in Article 10 may
  apply for the European Capital of Culture title
  for one year
  in the framework of an open competition organised every third year ▌ in accordance with the calendar ▌.

▌Cities in candidate and potential candidate countries
  shall only be allowed to participate in one competition during the period from 2020 to 2033.

Furthermore, each candidate or potential candidate country shall only be allowed to host the title once during the period from 2020 to 2033.

3a.
     
  Countries acceding to the Union after the adoption of this Decision but


  before 31 December 2026 shall be entitled to host the European Capital of Culture title according to the rules and procedures applicable to Member States seven years after accession. The calendar shall be updated accordingly. Countries acceding to the Union after 31 December 2026 shall not be entitled to participate under this European Capital of Culture action as Member States.

However, in years where there are already three European Capitals of Culture according to the calendar, the cities in the countries acceding to the Union shall only be entitled to host the European Capital of Culture title in the next available year in the calendar, in order of their accession.

If a city from a country acceding to the Union has previously participated in a competition for candidate and potential candidate countries, it cannot participate in any subsequent competition for Member States. Where a city of an acceding country has been designated as European Capital of Culture during the period from 2020 to 2033 in accordance with paragraph 3,


  that country shall not be entitled to nominate another of its cities as a European Capital of Culture under this action after its accession.

If more than one country accedes to the Union on the same date and if there is no agreement on the order of participation in the action between those countries, the Council shall organise a draw.

Article 4

Applications

▌

2.   A common application form based on the criteria laid down in Article 5
  (the ‘application form’) shall be prepared by the Commission and used by all candidate cities.
  Where a city involves its surrounding area, the application shall be made under the name of the city.

3.   Every application shall be based on a cultural programme with a strong European dimension.
  The cultural
  programme shall last one year and shall be created specifically for the European Capital of Culture title, in accordance with the criteria
  laid down
  in Article 5. ▌

Article 5

Criteria

The criteria for the assessment of the applications
  (the ‘criteria’)
  are divided into six categories: ‘
  contribution to the
  long-term strategy’, ▌‘European dimension’, ‘
  cultural and artistic content
  ’, ‘
  capacity to deliver
  ’, ‘outreach’ and ‘management’.

1.   As regards the ‘
  contribution to the
  long-term strategy’, the following factors shall be
  taken into account
  :

| (a) | the fact that a


  cultural
  strategy for the ▌city ▌is in place at the time of the application,
  which includes the European Capitals of Culture action and plans for
  sustaining
  the
  cultural activities beyond the year of the title; |
| --- | --- |

(a)

the fact that a


  cultural
  strategy for the ▌city ▌is in place at the time of the application,
  which includes the European Capitals of Culture action and plans for
  sustaining
  the
  cultural activities beyond the year of the title;

| (b) | the plans to strengthen the capacity of the cultural
  and creative sectors, including developing long-term links between the cultural, economic and social sectors in the city concerned
  ; |
| --- | --- |

(b)

the plans to strengthen the capacity of the cultural
  and creative sectors, including developing long-term links between the cultural, economic and social sectors in the city concerned
  ;

▌

| (d) | the envisaged long-term cultural, social and economic
  impact, including urban development,
  that the title would have on the city; |
| --- | --- |

(d)

the envisaged long-term cultural, social and economic
  impact, including urban development,
  that the title would have on the city;

| (e) | the plans for the monitoring and
  the
  evaluation of the impact of the title on the city
  and for disseminating the results of the evaluation
  . |
| --- | --- |

(e)

the plans for the monitoring and
  the
  evaluation of the impact of the title on the city
  and for disseminating the results of the evaluation
  .

▌

4.   As regards the ‘European dimension’, the following factors shall be assessed:

| (a) | the scope and quality of activities promoting the cultural diversity of Europe
  , intercultural dialogue and greater mutual understanding between European citizens
  ; |
| --- | --- |

(a)

the scope and quality of activities promoting the cultural diversity of Europe
  , intercultural dialogue and greater mutual understanding between European citizens
  ;

| (b) | the scope and quality of activities highlighting the common aspects of European cultures, heritage and history, as well as European integration
  and current European themes
  ; |
| --- | --- |

(b)

the scope and quality of activities highlighting the common aspects of European cultures, heritage and history, as well as European integration
  and current European themes
  ;

| (c) | the scope and quality of activities featuring European artists, cooperation with operators or cities in different countries
  including, where appropriate, other European Capitals of Culture,
  and transnational partnerships; |
| --- | --- |

(c)

the scope and quality of activities featuring European artists, cooperation with operators or cities in different countries
  including, where appropriate, other European Capitals of Culture,
  and transnational partnerships;

| (d) | the strategy to attract the interest of a broad European
  and international
  public. |
| --- | --- |

(d)

the strategy to attract the interest of a broad European
  and international
  public.

4a.
     
  As regards the ‘cultural and artistic content’, the following factors shall be assessed:

| (a) | a clear and coherent artistic vision and strategy for the cultural programme of the year; |
| --- | --- |

(a)

a clear and coherent artistic vision and strategy for the cultural programme of the year;

| (b) | the involvement of local artists and cultural organisations in the conception and implementation of the cultural programme; |
| --- | --- |

(b)

the involvement of local artists and cultural organisations in the conception and implementation of the cultural programme;

| (c) | the range and diversity of the activities proposed and their overall artistic quality; |
| --- | --- |

(c)

the range and diversity of the activities proposed and their overall artistic quality;

| (d) | the capacity to combine local cultural heritage and traditional art forms with new, innovative and experimental cultural expressions. |
| --- | --- |

(d)

the capacity to combine local cultural heritage and traditional art forms with new, innovative and experimental cultural expressions.

4b.
     
  As regards the ‘capacity to deliver’, the candidate cities shall demonstrate that:

| (a) | the application has broad and strong political support and a sustainable commitment from the local, regional and national authorities; |
| --- | --- |

(a)

the application has broad and strong political support and a sustainable commitment from the local, regional and national authorities;

| (b) | the city has, or will have, adequate and viable infrastructure to host the title. |
| --- | --- |

(b)

the city has, or will have, adequate and viable infrastructure to host the title.

5.   As regards ‘outreach’, the following factors shall be assessed:

| (a) | the involvement of the local population and civil society in the preparation of the application and the implementation of the European Capital of Culture; |
| --- | --- |

(a)

the involvement of the local population and civil society in the preparation of the application and the implementation of the European Capital of Culture;

| (b) | the creation of new and sustainable opportunities for a wide range of citizens to attend or participate in cultural activities, in particular young people
  , volunteers
  and the marginalised and disadvantaged, including minorities. Special attention shall also be given ▌to the accessibility of these activities to persons with disabilities and the elderly; |
| --- | --- |

(b)

the creation of new and sustainable opportunities for a wide range of citizens to attend or participate in cultural activities, in particular young people
  , volunteers
  and the marginalised and disadvantaged, including minorities. Special attention shall also be given ▌to the accessibility of these activities to persons with disabilities and the elderly;

| (c) | the overall strategy for audience development, and in particular the link with education and the participation of schools. |
| --- | --- |

(c)

the overall strategy for audience development, and in particular the link with education and the participation of schools.

6.   As regards ‘management’, the following factors shall be assessed:

| (a) | the feasibility of the
  fund-raising strategy and
  proposed budget
  , which includes, where appropriate, plans to seek financial support from Union programmes and funds.
  This budget shall cover the preparation phase, the year of the title in itself
  , the evaluation
  and provisions for the legacy activities
  , and contingency planning
  ; |
| --- | --- |

(a)

the feasibility of the
  fund-raising strategy and
  proposed budget
  , which includes, where appropriate, plans to seek financial support from Union programmes and funds.
  This budget shall cover the preparation phase, the year of the title in itself
  , the evaluation
  and provisions for the legacy activities
  , and contingency planning
  ;

| (b) | the envisaged governance ▌and delivery
  structure
  for the implementation of the European Capital of Culture,
  which shall include provision for appropriate cooperation between the local authority and the delivery structure, including the artistic team
  ; |
| --- | --- |

(b)

the envisaged governance ▌and delivery
  structure
  for the implementation of the European Capital of Culture,
  which shall include provision for appropriate cooperation between the local authority and the delivery structure, including the artistic team
  ;

| (c) | the
  procedures for the
  appointment ▌of the
  general and
  artistic
  directors
  and
  their fields
  of action; |
| --- | --- |

(c)

the
  procedures for the
  appointment ▌of the
  general and
  artistic
  directors
  and
  their fields
  of action;

| (d) | the
  marketing and
  communication strategy,
  which
  shall be comprehensive and shall highlight that the European Capitals of Culture
  is
  an
  action
  of the Union; |
| --- | --- |

(d)

the
  marketing and
  communication strategy,
  which
  shall be comprehensive and shall highlight that the European Capitals of Culture
  is
  an
  action
  of the Union;

| (da) | the existence of a delivery structure the staff of which have the appropriate skills and experience to plan, manage and deliver the cultural programme for the year of the title. |
| --- | --- |

(da)

the existence of a delivery structure the staff of which have the appropriate skills and experience to plan, manage and deliver the cultural programme for the year of the title.

Article 6

Expert
  panel

1.   A ▌panel of independent experts (
  the
  ‘▌panel’) shall be established to carry out the selection and monitoring procedures.

1a.
     
  The panel shall consist of 10 experts appointed by Union institutions and bodies in accordance with paragraph 2 (the ‘European experts’).

In addition, for the selection and monitoring of the city from a Member State, the Member State concerned shall be entitled to appoint up to two experts (the ‘national experts’) in accordance with its own procedures and in consultation with the Commission.

2.   ▌

After organising a call for expressions of interest,
  the Commission shall
  propose
  a pool of potential
  European experts
  .

The European Parliament, the Council and the Commission shall subsequently select three experts each from
  the
  pool and appoint them in accordance with their respective procedures. The Committee of the Regions shall select one expert
  from the pool
  and appoint
  that expert
  in accordance with its procedures.

When selecting European experts,
  each
  of those Union institutions
  and
  bodies
  shall seek to ensure
  complementarity of the competences,
  a balanced geographical
  distribution and gender balance in the overall composition of the panel
  .

▌

2a.
     
  All experts shall be citizens of the Union. They shall be independent and have substantial experience and expertise in the cultural sector, in the cultural development of cities, or in the organisation of a European Capital of Culture or an international cultural event of similar scope and scale. The experts shall also be in a position to devote an appropriate number of working days per year to the panel.

The panel shall designate its chairperson.

3.   The ▌European
  experts
  shall be appointed for a period of three years.

Notwithstanding the first subparagraph,
  as regards the first
  establishment of the
  panel, the European Parliament shall appoint its ▌experts for three years, the Council for one year, the Commission for two years and the Committee of the Regions ▌for one year ▌.

4.   
  All experts
  of the ▌panel shall declare any actual or potential conflict of interest in respect of a specific candidate city. In the event of such a declaration by
  an expert
  , or if such a conflict of interest comes to light, that
  expert
  shall
  resign and the relevant Union institution or body or
  Member State
  shall replace that expert for the remainder of the mandate, in accordance with the relevant procedure
  .

5.   
  The Commission
  shall
  publish,
  on
  its
  website, all reports of the panel
  .

Article 7

Submission of applications in the Member States

1.   Each Member State shall be responsible for the organisation of the competition between its cities in accordance with the calendar ▌.

2.   The Member States shall publish a call for submission of applications
  at least
  six years before the ▌year of the title.

By way of derogation, those Member States which are entitled to nominate a European Capital of Culture in 2020 shall publish such a call as soon as possible after ...

   (*2).

Each call for submission of applications, aimed at the candidate cities for the title, shall
  contain
  the ▌application form ▌.

The deadline for the submission of applications
  by candidate cities
  under each call for submission of applications shall be scheduled
  at the earliest
  10 months after its publication.

3.   Applications shall be notified to the Commission by the Member State concerned.

Article 8

Pre-selection in the Member States

1.   Each ▌Member
  State
  concerned shall convene the ▌panel for a pre-selection meeting with the candidate cities
  at least
  five years before ▌the year of the title.

2.   The ▌panel
  , after assessing
  the applications according to the criteria, shall agree on a short-list of candidate cities ▌and
  shall
  issue a
  pre-selection
  report on
  all
  the applications
  providing, inter alia,
  recommendations to the short-listed candidate cities.

3.   The ▌panel shall submit
  the pre-selection
  report to the Member
  States
  concerned and to the Commission. Each of the Member States concerned shall formally approve the short-list based on the report of the panel.

Article 9

Selection in the Member States

1.   The short-listed candidate cities shall complete
  and revise
  their applications
  with a view to complying with the
  criteria
  as well as taking into account
  the recommendations
  contained in the
  pre-selection
  report
  , and
  shall submit
  them to the Member
  State
  concerned, which shall then
  transmit
  them to the Commission.

2.   Each ▌Member
  State
  concerned shall convene the ▌panel for a final selection meeting with the short-listed candidate cities
  no later than
  nine months after the pre-selection meeting.

Where necessary, the Member State concerned, in consultation with the Commission, may extend that deadline for a reasonable period.

3.   The ▌panel shall
  assess
  the completed
  and revised
  applications.

4.   The ▌panel shall issue a
  selection
  report on the applications with a recommendation for the nomination of one city in the Member State concerned as European Capital of Culture. However, if none of the candidate cities fulfils
  all
  the criteria, the ▌panel may recommend that the title should not be awarded that year.

The
  selection
  report shall also contain recommendations to the ▌city
  concerned regarding
  the progress to be made by the year of the title.

The
  panel
  shall
  submit the selection report
  to the Member State concerned and to the Commission. ▌

Article 10

Pre-selection and selection in
  candidate and potential candidate countries

1.   The Commission shall be responsible for the organisation of the competition between cities in candidate and potential candidate countries.

2.   The Commission shall publish in the Official Journal of the European Union a call for submission of applications
  at least
  six years before the ▌year of the title. ▌

Each call for submission of applications, aimed at the candidate cities for the title, shall contain the application form.

The deadline for submitting applications under each call for submission of applications shall be scheduled at the earliest 10 months after its publication.

▌

4.   The pre-selection of the cities shall be carried out by the ▌panel
  at least
  five years before the ▌year of the title, on the basis of the ▌application
  form
  . No meeting with the candidate cities
  shall
  be organised.

The ▌panel
  , after assessing
  the applications according to the criteria, shall agree on a short-list of candidate cities ▌and
  shall
  issue a
  pre-selection
  report on
  all
  the applications
  providing, inter alia,
  recommendations to the short-listed candidate cities.
  The panel shall submit its pre-selection
  report ▌to the Commission ▌.

5.   The short-listed candidate cities shall complete
  and revise
  their applications
  with a view to complying with
  the criteria
  as well as taking into account
  recommendations
  contained in
  the pre-selection
  report,
  and
  shall submit
  them to the Commission.

The Commission shall convene the ▌panel for a final selection meeting with the
  short-listed
  cities
  no later than
  nine months after the pre-selection
  meeting
  .
  Where necessary, the Commission may extend that deadline for a reasonable period.

The ▌panel shall
  assess
  the completed
  and revised
  applications.

It shall issue a
  selection
  report on the applications of the short-listed candidate cities together with a recommendation for the nomination as European Capital of Culture of a maximum of one city in one candidate country or potential candidate country.

However, if none of the candidate cities fulfil all the criteria, the ▌panel may recommend that the title should not be awarded that year.

The
  selection
  report shall also contain recommendations to the ▌city
  concerned regarding
  the progress ▌to be made by the year of the title.

The panel shall submit its selection
  report ▌to the Commission ▌.

Article 11

Designation

The Commission shall, by means of implementing acts, officially designate the European Capitals of Culture, having due regard to the recommendations of the ▌panel. The Commission shall inform the European Parliament, the Council and the Committee of the Regions of its designation.

Article 12

Cooperation between the designated cities

Cities designated for
  the same year shall seek to develop links between their cultural programmes
  and
  the cooperation
  may be considered
  in the framework of the monitoring procedure as laid down in Article 13.

Article 13

Monitoring

1.   The ▌panel shall monitor the preparation of the European Capitals of Culture and provide the cities with support and guidance from the time of their designation to the beginning of the year of the title.

2.   To
  that
  end, the Commission shall convene
  three meetings which shall be attended by
  the ▌panel and the
  designated
  cities ▌: the first meeting shall take place three years before the ▌year of the title; the second meeting shall take place 18 months before ▌the year of the title and the third meeting shall take place two months before the ▌year of the title. The Member State
  or candidate or potential candidate
  country concerned may nominate an observer to those meetings.

The cities shall issue progress reports to the Commission six weeks before each of the meetings.

During the meetings, the ▌panel shall take stock of the preparations and give advice with a view to helping the cities to develop a high-quality
  cultural
  programme and an effective strategy. The panel shall pay special attention to the recommendations laid down in the selection report and in the preceding monitoring reports.

3.   After each meeting, the ▌panel shall issue a report on the state of preparations and any steps to be taken.

The panel shall transmit its
  monitoring reports ▌to the Commission
  , as well as
  to the cities and Member States or
  countries
  concerned. ▌

4.   In addition to the monitoring meetings, the Commission may organise visits by
  the
  panel ▌to the designated cities whenever necessary.

Article 14

Prize

1.   ▌The Commission
  may
  award a pecuniary prize
  (the ‘prize’)
  in honour of Melina Mercouri to
  a
  designated
  city subject to the funding made available under the relevant multiannual financial framework
  .

The legal and financial aspects of
  the
  prize shall be dealt with in the framework of the respective Union programmes supporting culture.

2.   ▌The prize shall be paid no later than the end of
  March
  of the year of the title, provided that the city
  concerned
  keeps to the commitments it made at the application stage
  , complies with the criteria and takes into account the
  recommendations
  contained
  in the selection and monitoring reports ▌.

The commitments made at the application stage shall be deemed to have been adhered to by the designated city where no substantial change was made to the programme and strategy between the application stage and the year of the title, and in particular where:

| (a) | the budget
  was maintained at a level capable of delivering a high-quality cultural programme in line with the application and the criteria; |
| --- | --- |

(a)

the budget
  was maintained at a level capable of delivering a high-quality cultural programme in line with the application and the criteria;

| (b) | the independence of the artistic team was
  appropriately
  respected; |
| --- | --- |

(b)

the independence of the artistic team was
  appropriately
  respected;

| (c) | the European dimension remained sufficiently strong in the final version of the cultural programme; |
| --- | --- |

(c)

the European dimension remained sufficiently strong in the final version of the cultural programme;

| (d) | the
  marketing and
  communication strategy and the communication material used by the
  designated
  city clearly reflect the fact that the European Capitals of Culture
  is
  an
  action
  of the Union; |
| --- | --- |

(d)

the
  marketing and
  communication strategy and the communication material used by the
  designated
  city clearly reflect the fact that the European Capitals of Culture
  is
  an
  action
  of the Union;

| (e) | the plans for the monitoring and evaluation of the impacts of the title on the city concerned are in place. |
| --- | --- |

(e)

the plans for the monitoring and evaluation of the impacts of the title on the city concerned are in place.

Article 15

Practical arrangements

The Commission shall in particular:

| (a) | ensure the overall coherence of the action; |
| --- | --- |

(a)

ensure the overall coherence of the action;

| (b) | ensure coordination between the Member States and the ▌panel; |
| --- | --- |

(b)

ensure coordination between the Member States and the ▌panel;

| (c) | in the light of the objectives and criteria, establish guidelines to assist with the selection and monitoring procedures in close cooperation with the ▌panel; |
| --- | --- |

(c)

in the light of the objectives and criteria, establish guidelines to assist with the selection and monitoring procedures in close cooperation with the ▌panel;

| (d) | provide
  technical
  support to the ▌panel; |
| --- | --- |

(d)

provide
  technical
  support to the ▌panel;

| (e) | make public all relevant information and contribute to the visibility of the action at European
  and international
  level; |
| --- | --- |

(e)

make public all relevant information and contribute to the visibility of the action at European
  and international
  level;

| (f) | foster the exchange of experience and of
  good
  practices between past, present and future
  European
  Capitals
  of Culture
  , as well as candidate cities
  , and promote wider dissemination of the cities’ evaluation reports and lessons learned. |
| --- | --- |

(f)

foster the exchange of experience and of
  good
  practices between past, present and future
  European
  Capitals
  of Culture
  , as well as candidate cities
  , and promote wider dissemination of the cities’ evaluation reports and lessons learned.

Article 16

Evaluation

1.   The evaluation of the results of each European Capital of Culture shall be ▌the responsibility of the ▌city
  concerned
  .

The Commission shall establish common guidelines and indicators for the cities based on the objectives and the criteria ▌in order to ensure a coherent approach to the evaluation procedure.

The cities shall
  produce
  their evaluation reports
  and transmit them
  to the Commission by 31
  December
  of the year following the year of the title ▌. The Commission shall publish
  the evaluation
  reports
  on its website
  .

2.   In addition to the cities' evaluations, the Commission shall also ensure
  that
  external and independent evaluation of the results of the
  action are produced
  on a regular basis. ▌

The
  external and independent
  evaluation
  shall
  focus on putting all past
  European Capitals of Culture
  in a European context, allowing for comparisons and drawing useful lessons for future European Capitals of Culture, as well as for all European cities. It shall also assess the
  action as a whole, including the efficiency of the processes involved in running
  it
  ,
  its
  impact ▌and how it could be improved.

The Commission shall present to the European Parliament, the Council and the Committee of the Regions
  the following reports based on those evaluations, accompanied, where appropriate, by relevant proposals
  :

| (a) | a first interim ▌report
  by
  31 December 2024; |
| --- | --- |

(a)

a first interim ▌report
  by
  31 December 2024;

| (b) | a second interim ▌report
  by
  31 December 2029; |
| --- | --- |

(b)

a second interim ▌report
  by
  31 December 2029;

| (c) | an ex-post ▌report
  by
  31 December 2034. |
| --- | --- |

(c)

an ex-post ▌report
  by
  31 December 2034.

Article 17

Repeal and transitional provisions

Decision No 1622/2006/EC is hereby repealed. It shall however continue to apply in the case of cities which have been designated or are in the process of being designated as European Capitals of Culture for the years from 2012 to 2019.

Article 18

Entry into force

This Decision shall enter into force on the day following that of its publication in the Official Journal of the European Union.

Done at ▌

For the European Parliament

The President

For the Council

The President

---

(*1)  Amendments: new or amended text is highlighted in bold italics; deletions are indicated by the symbol ▌.

*1

(1)  

  OJ C 113, 18.4.2012, p. 17 and OJ C 17, 19.1.2013, p. 97.

1

OJ C 113, 18.4.2012, p. 17 and OJ C 17, 19.1.2013, p. 97.

(2)  Position of the European Parliament of 12 December 2013.

2

(3)  OJ C 287, 29.11.2007, p. 1.

3

(4)  

  OJ C 247 E, 15.10.2009, p. 32.

4

OJ C 247 E, 15.10.2009, p. 32.

(5)  
  Decision No 1622/2006/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 24 October 2006 establishing a Community action for the European Capital of Culture event for the years 2007 to 2019 (

  OJ L 304, 3.11.2006, p. 1).

5

Decision No 1622/2006/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 24 October 2006 establishing a Community action for the European Capital of Culture event for the years 2007 to 2019 (

(6)  
  Regulation (EU) No 1295/2013 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 11 December 2013 establishing the Creative Europe Programme (2014 to 2020) and repealing Decisions No 1718/2006/EC, No 1855/2006/EC and No 1041/2009/EC (OJ L 347, 20.12.2013, p. 221).

6

Regulation (EU) No 1295/2013 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 11 December 2013 establishing the Creative Europe Programme (2014 to 2020) and repealing Decisions No 1718/2006/EC, No 1855/2006/EC and No 1041/2009/EC (OJ L 347, 20.12.2013, p. 221).

(7)  
  14944/10
  .

7

14944/10

(8)  

  OJ C 56 E, 26.2.2013, p. 41.

8

OJ C 56 E, 26.2.2013, p. 41.

(*2)  
  Date of the entry into force of this Decision.

*2

Date of the entry into force of this Decision.

ANNEX

Calendar

| 2020 | Croatia ▌ | Ireland | ▌ |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 2021 | Romania | Greece | Candidate or potential candidate country |
| 2022 | Lithuania | Luxembourg | |
| 2023 | Hungary | United Kingdom | ▌ |
| 2024 | Estonia | Austria | Candidate or potential candidate country |
| 2025 | Slovenia | Germany | |
| 2026 | Slovakia | Finland | ▌ |
| 2027 | Latvia | Portugal | Candidate or potential candidate country |
| 2028 | Czech Republic | France | |
| 2029 | Poland | Sweden | ▌ |
| 2030 | Cyprus | Belgium | Candidate or potential candidate country |
| 2031 | Malta | Spain | |
| 2032 | Bulgaria | Denmark | ▌ |
| 2033 | Netherlands | Italy | Candidate or potential candidate country |

2020

Croatia ▌

Ireland

▌

2021

Romania

Greece

Candidate or potential candidate country

2022

Lithuania

Luxembourg

2023

Hungary

United Kingdom

▌

2024

Estonia

Austria

Candidate or potential candidate country

2025

Slovenia

Germany

2026

Slovakia

Finland

▌

2027

Latvia

Portugal

Candidate or potential candidate country

2028

Czech Republic

France

2029

Poland

Sweden

▌

2030

Cyprus

Belgium

Candidate or potential candidate country

2031

Malta

Spain

2032

Bulgaria

Denmark

▌

2033

Netherlands

Italy

Candidate or potential candidate country

---