alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
##### Table of Contents



SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
 Washington, D.C. 20549
 Form 8-K
 CURRENT REPORT  Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934
 Date of Report (Date of earliest event reported):  July 26, 2011
 Ford
Credit Auto Owner Trust 2011-B  (Issuer of the notes)
 Ford
Credit Auto Receivables Two LLC  (Depositor)
 Ford
Motor Credit Company LLC
  
 333-167489-03
    
    27-6251987(Commission File Number)
    
    (IRS Employer Identification No.)c/o Ford Credit SPE Management Officec/o Ford Motor Credit Company LLCc/o Ford Motor Company 
World Headquarters, Suite 801-C1One American RoadDearborn, Michigan
    
    48126(Address of principal executive offices)
    
    (Zip Code)
 313-594-3495
  o
 o
 o
 o




---



TABLE OF CONTENTS  Item 8.01 Other EventsItem 9.01. Financial Statements, Pro Forma Financial Information and Exhibits.SIGNATURESEXHIBIT INDEXEX-5.1EX-8.1    Table of Contents  
 Other Events
   
 Financial Statements, Pro Forma Financial Information and Exhibits
     Exhibit No.
    
    DescriptionExhibit 5.1
    
    Opinion of Katten Muchin Rosenman LLP with respect to legality.Exhibit 8.1
    
    Opinion of Katten Muchin Rosenman LLP with respect to federal
income tax matters.




---



##### Table of Contents



FORD CREDIT AUTO OWNER TRUST 2011-BBy:
    FORD MOTOR CREDIT COMPANY LLC,
as ServicerBy:
    /s/ Susan J. ThomasName:
    Susan J. ThomasTitle:
    Secretary  3




---



##### Table of Contents



EXHIBIT INDEX
 Exhibit No.
    
    DescriptionExhibit 5.1
    
    Opinion of Katten Muchin Rosenman LLP with respect to legalityExhibit 8.1
    
    Opinion of Katten Muchin Rosenman LLP with respect to federal
income tax matters
 4
#### § 365.140 Employment.

No qualified individual with handicaps shall, on the basis of handicap, be subjected to discrimination in employment under any program or activity conducted by the agency. The definitions, requirements and procedures of section 501 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973 (29 U.S.C. 791), as established by the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission in 29 CFR part 1613, shall apply to employment in federally conducted programs or activities.
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 00-7359

ERNEST LEE JONES, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus ROBERT WARD, Warden of Evans Correctional Institution; NFN ASSOCIATE WARDEN OF EVANS CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION; NFN STUCKY, Major of Security; NFN NOLAN, Lieutenant, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District ofSouth Carolina, at Florence. Joseph F. Anderson, Jr., Chief District Judge. (CA-99-207-4-17BF) Submitted: November 9, 2000 Decided: November 16, 2000 Before WILKINS, WILLIAMS, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Ernest Lee Jones, Appellant Pro Se. Andrew Foster McLeod, HARRIS & MCLEOD, Cheraw, South Carolina, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: Ernest Lee Jones seeks to appeal the district court’s order granting summary judgment to the Defendants on Jones’ 42 U.S.C.A. § 1983 (West Supp. 2000) complaint. We dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction because Jones’ notice of appeal was not timely filed.Parties are accorded thirty days after the entry of the district court’s final judgment or order to note an appeal, see Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(1), unless the district court extends the appeal period under Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(5) or reopens the appeal period under Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(6). This appeal period is “mandatory and jurisdictional.” Browder v. Director, Dep’t of Corrections , 434 U.S. 257, 264 (1978) (quoting United States v. Robinson , 361 U.S. 220, 229 (1960)). The district court’s order was entered on the docket on May 15, 2000. Jones’ notice of appeal was filed on September 18, 2000. Because Jones failed to file a timely notice of appeal or to obtain an extension or reopening of the appeal period, we dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
§ 498.213 Motions. ( a ) An application to the ALJ for an order or ruling will be by motion. Motions will: ( 1 ) State the relief sought, the authority relied upon and the facts alleged; and
( 2 ) Be filed with the ALJ and served on all other parties.
( b ) Except for motions made during a prehearing conference or at a hearing, all motions will be in writing.
( c ) Within 10 days after a written motion is served, or such other time as may be fixed by the ALJ, any party may file a response to such motion.
( d ) The ALJ may not grant or deny a written motion before the time for filing responses has expired, except upon consent of the parties or following a hearing on the motion.
( e ) The ALJ will make a reasonable effort to dispose of all outstanding motions prior to the beginning of the hearing.
( f ) There is no right to appeal to the DAB any interlocutory ruling by the ALJ.
[61 FR 65470, Dec. 13, 1996]
Meeting Record | The White House

http://www.whitehouse.gov/omb/2060_meeting_07232013 [8/20/2013 1:54:36 PM] Get Email Updates Contact Us

Home • The Administration • Office of Management and Budget

REGULATION & INFORMATION POLICY 

### About OIRA Information Policy Federal Collection of Information Regulatory Matters

Meetings and Outside Communication Reports to Congress For Agencies Statistical Programs & Standards 

# Meeting Record

Meeting Record Regarding: Standards of Performance for Greenhouse Gas Emissions from New Stationary Sources: Electric Utilty Generation Units Date: 7 / 23 / 2013

Name Affiliation Client (if applicable) Bob Wayland EPA/OAR

Alex Barron EPA/OP

Paul Balzuale EPA/OP Nathan Frey OMB/OIRA Jim Laity OMB/OIRA Cortney Higgins OMB/OIRA

Patrick Hedren GE Larry Boggs GE

Francois-Zaiver Dussssart GE

Andre Dickie GE

Karl Fessenden GE

Jim Stock CEA

Rick Duke CEQ Gary Guzy CEQ

Drew McConville CEQ

Howard Shelanski OMB/OIRA

Dominic Mancini OMB/OIRA

Meeting material provided to OMB ( pages, kb)

Document 1 (33 pages, 221 kb) Document 2 (1 page, 212 kb) Document 3 (4 pages, 436 kb) 

### About OMBlog The Budget Management Regulation & Information Policy Legislative Information Join OMB Contact OMBMeeting Record | The White House

http://www.whitehouse.gov/omb/2060_meeting_07232013 [8/20/2013 1:54:36 PM] Home The White House Blog

Photos & Videos

Photo Galleries Video Performances Live Streams Podcasts Briefing Room Your Weekly Address Speeches & Remarks Press Briefings Statements & Releases White House Schedule Presidential Actions Legislation Nominations & Appointments Disclosures Issues Civil Rights Defense Disabilities Economy Education Energy & Environment Ethics Equal Pay Foreign Policy Health Care Homeland Security Immigration Refinancing Rural Service Seniors & Social Security Snapshots Taxes Technology Urban and Economic Mobility Veterans Violence Prevention Women The Administration

President Barack Obama Vice President Joe Biden First Lady Michelle Obama Dr. Jill Biden The Cabinet White House Staff Executive Office of the President Other Advisory Boards About the White House

Inside the White House Presidents First Ladies The Oval Office The Vice President's Residence & Office Eisenhower Executive Office Building Camp David Air Force One White House Fellows White House Internships Tours & Events Mobile Apps Our Government

The Executive Branch The Legislative Branch The Judicial Branch The Constitution Federal Agencies & Commissions Elections & Voting State & Local Government Resources Federal Register | Join OMB | FOIA | No FEAR Act | OMB Locator | USA.Gov | Accessibility | Privacy Policy | Site Search

En español Accessibility Copyright Information Privacy Policy Contact USA.gov Developers Apply for a Job
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY HIGH

 8,568

 8,131

 9,470

 9,469

 10,707

 11,738

 13,292

 13,682

 13,109

 14,228

 15,648

 14,783

 13,324

 12,408

 11,477

 11,594

 11,931

 11,329

 11,707

 13,173

 14,046

 11,045

 13,726

 14,554

 13,100

 12,524

 13,116

 12,820

 12,338

 11,942

 11,856

 2,485

 2,326

 2,507

 2,797

 2,810

 2,499

 2,566

 2,997

 3,183

 3,487

 2,618

 3,393

 4,172

 4,187

 3,719

 2,355

 2,821

 4,479

 4,530

 3,651

 3,582

 2,775

 3,371

 4,983

 4,799

 4,733

 4,960

 4,879

 3,966

 4,154

 4,557

 5,417

 5,181

 4,809

 5,156

 5,685

 5,963

 6,858

 7,388

 7,608

 8,090

 7,743

 8,176

 8,516

 8,712

 7,566

 5,928

 6,496

 7,340

 7,154

 7,381

 7,061

 8,248

 9,083

 9,038

 8,725

 8,865

 9,039

 8,959

 7,730

 8,129

 7,819

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

AUGUST 2018 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: September 6, 2018

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

PITTSBURG TOP ON THE SACRAMENTO RIVER
#### Sahak NORTIKYAN; Azniv Mosinyan, Petitioners, v. Alberto R. GONZALES, Attorney General, Respondent.

No. 04-73184.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted Feb. 13, 2006.*

Decided Feb. 22, 2006.

Aris Artounians, Law Office of Aris Artounians, Glendale, CA, for Petitioner.

*814CAC-District Counsel, Esq., Office of the District Counsel Department of Homeland Security, Los Angeles, CA, Ronald E. LeFevre, Chief Counsel, Office of the District Counsel Department of Homeland Security, San Francisco, CA, Jacqueline R. Dryden, Esq., U.S. Department of Justice Civil Div./Office of Immigration Lit., John F. De Pue, Esq., U.S. Department of Justice Criminal Division, Washington, DC, for Respondent.

Before: FERNANDEZ, RYMER, and BYBEE, Circuit Judges.

*

 The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. *See*Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

MEMORANDUM **

Sahak Nortikyan, a native of Syria and citizen of Armenia, and his wife, Azniv Mosinyan, a native and citizen of Armenia, petition for review of the order of the Board of Immigration Appeals (“BIA”), affirming an immigration judge’s (“IJ”) decision denying their application for asylum, withholding of removal, and relief under the Convention Against Torture (“CAT”). To the extent we have jurisdiction, it is conferred by 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We review for substantial evidence the determination of an applicant’s eligibility for withholding of removal. *See Hakeem v. INS,*273 F.3d 812, 816 (9th Cir.2001). We dismiss in part and deny in part the petition for review.

We lack jurisdiction to review the IJ’s determination that extraordinary circumstances prevented petitioners from filing their asylum application within one year of entering the United States. *See*8 U.S.C. § 1158(a)(3); *Ramadan v. Gonzales,*427 F.3d 1218, 1222 (9th Cir.2005).

Petitioners’ evidence does not compel the conclusion that they are eligible for withholding of removal because they did not establish that it is more likely than not that they would be persecuted on account of an enumerated ground if returned to Armenia. *See Hakeem,*273 F.3d at 816-17.

We lack jurisdiction to consider petitioners’ challenge to the denial of CAT relief because they did not exhaust it before the BIA. *See Barron v. Ashcroft,*358 F.3d 674, 678 (9th Cir.2004).

To the degree petitioners contend that the BIA’s streamlined decision indicates that their claims were not considered, this contention is foreclosed by *Falcon Carriche v. Ashcroft,*350 F.3d 845, 850 (9th Cir.2003).

Nortikyan’s voluntary departure period was stayed, and that stay will expire upon issuance of the mandate. *See Desta v. Ashcroft,*365 F.3d 741 (9th Cir.2004).

Petitioners’ December 27, 2005 motion to hold the petition for review in abeyance so they may request the government to file a joint motion to reopen is denied.

PETITION FOR REVIEW DISMISSED in part; DENIED in part

**

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
### §268b. Advances from appropriation "Boundary line, Alaska and Canada, and the United States and Canada"

Advances of money under the appropriation "Boundary line, Alaska and Canada, and the United States and Canada", may be made to the commissioner on the part of the United States and by his authority to chiefs of parties prior to March 2, 1921.

(Apr. 15, 1918, ch. 52, 40 Stat. 523; Mar. 2, 1921, ch. 113, 41 Stat. 1210; June 10, 1921, ch. 18, title III, §304, 42 Stat. 24; Apr. 29, 1926, ch. 195, title I, 44 Stat. 336; Feb. 24, 1927, ch. 189, title I, 44 Stat. 1185; Feb. 15, 1928, ch. 57, title I, 45 Stat. 70; Jan. 25, 1929, ch. 102, title I, 45 Stat. 1101; Apr. 18, 1930, ch. 184, title I, 46 Stat. 179; Pub. L. 89–554, §8(a), Sept. 6, 1966, 80 Stat. 643; Pub. L. 92–310, title II, §231(aa), June 6, 1972, 86 Stat. 212; Pub. L. 104–316, title I, §111(a), Oct. 19, 1996, 110 Stat. 3833.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section is from the Diplomatic and Consular Service Appropriation Act of Mar. 2, 1921. Similar provisions were contained in act Apr. 15, 1918, and other prior acts.

Acts Apr. 29, 1926; Feb. 24, 1927; Feb. 15, 1928; Jan. 25, 1929; and Apr. 18, 1930, were appropriation acts for the fiscal years 1927, 1928, 1929, 1930, and 1931, respectively. These Acts made applicable boundary appropriations for the enumerated fiscal years.

Section was formerly classified to section 535 of Title 31 prior to the general revision and enactment of Title 31, Money and Finance, by Pub. L. 97–258, §1, Sept. 13, 1982, 96 Stat. 877.

#### Amendments

1996—Pub. L. 104–316 substituted "chiefs of parties" for "chiefs of parties and accounts arising under advances shall be rendered through and by the commissioner on the part of the United States to the General Accounting Office as under advances made to chiefs of parties".

1972—Pub. L. 92–310 struck out provisions that required chiefs of parties to give bonds.

1966—Pub. L. 89–554 struck out provisions that related to traveling expenses of the commissioner.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Transfer of Functions

"General Accounting Office" substituted in text for "Treasury Department" pursuant to act June 10, 1921, which transferred powers and duties conferred upon Comptroller, six auditors, and certain other officers of the Treasury to General Accounting Office. See section 701 et seq. of Title 31, Money and Finance.
Exhibit
      32.2


CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO SECTION 1350 OF CHAPTER 63 OF TITLE 18 OF THE UNITED STATES
      CODE








I,
      Alicia B. Derrah, the Chief
      Financial Officer and principal financial officer of Man Investments (USA)
      Corp., the Managing Member of Man-AHL 130, LLC (“Man-AHL 130”), certify that (i)
      the Annual Report of Man-AHL 130 on Form 10-K for the period ending March 31,
      2007 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and (ii) the information contained in such
      Annual Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition
      and results of operations of Man-AHL 130.











Date:
      June 29, 2007


/s/
                Alicia B. Derrah
              Alicia
                B. Derrah
              Chief
                Financial Officer
Electrical Conductivity, UMHOS

Day High Low Mean

1 181 170 173

2 177 164 171

3 178 165 171

4 175 161 170

5 178 164 172

6 189 168 178

7 192 170 181

8 191 171 183

9 197 177 187

10 0 0 0

11 208 182 193

12 207 181 191

13 204 180 188

14 195 180 185

15 192 182 186

16 205 182 189

17 197 180 189

18 196 180 187

19 200 179 188

20 223 178 194

21 410 181 203

22 404 184 219

23 746 185 296

24 395 188 246

25 258 189 210

26 232 188 203

27 220 188 200

28 377 189 220

29 355 188 226

30 1,401 190 501

31 2,088 186 525

COMMENT(S): 0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

Historical Archive and Report Database

Port Chicago Top In Suisun Bay 

Run Date: 4/14/2024

March 2024
Exhibit 99.1
 Sabine Royalty Trust
 SABINE ROYALTY TRUST ANNOUNCES
MONTHLY CASH DISTRIBUTION FOR JULY
 Dallas, Texas, July 5, 2011 http://www.sbr-sabineroyalty.com/
  Net to Trust SalesVolumes
    
    Average PriceOil
    
    Gas
    
    Oil
    
    Gas(bbls)
    
    (Mcf)
    
    (per bbl)
    
    (per Mcf)Current Month
    
    
    39,711
    
    
    
    576,712
    
    
    $
    102.21
    
    
    $
    4.30Prior Month
    
    
    30,096
    
    
    
    543,540
    
    
    $
    98.62
    
    
    $
    4.23
 th
   Contact:
    
    Ron E. HooperSenior Vice PresidentU.S. Trust, Bank of America Private Wealth Management, TrusteeToll Free Number: 1.800.365.6541
### **CHAPTER 83—UNITED STATES LEADERSHIP AGAINST HIV/AIDS, TUBERCULOSIS, AND MALARIA**

Sec.
7601.
Findings.
7602.
Definitions.
7603.
Purpose.
7604.
Authority to consolidate and combine reports.

#### SUBCHAPTER I—POLICY PLANNING AND COORDINATION

7611.
Development of a comprehensive, five-year, global strategy.
7612.
HIV/AIDS response Coordinator.
7612a.
HIV/AIDS Working Capital Fund.

#### SUBCHAPTER II—SUPPORT FOR MULTILATERAL FUNDS, PROGRAMS, AND PUBLIC-PRIVATE PARTNERSHIPS

7621.
Sense of Congress on public-private partnerships.
7622.
Participation in the Global Fund to Fight AIDS, Tuberculosis and Malaria.
7623.
Combating HIV/AIDS, tuberculosis, and malaria by strengthening health policies and health systems of partner countries.
7624.
Facilitating vaccine development.

#### SUBCHAPTER III—BILATERAL EFFORTS

#### Part A—General Assistance and Programs

7631.
Assistance to combat HIV/AIDS.
7631a.
United States Agency for International Development.
7632.
Authorization of appropriations to combat tuberculosis.
7633.
Assistance to combat malaria.
7634.
Malaria response Coordinator.
7635.
Report on treatment activities by relevant executive branch agencies.
7636.
Study on illegal diversions of prescription drugs.

#### Part B—Assistance for Children and Families

7651.
Findings.
7652.
Policy and requirements.
7653.
Annual reports on prevention of mother-to-child transmission of the HIV infection.
7654.
Pilot program of assistance for children and families affected by HIV/AIDS.
7655.
Pilot program on family survival partnerships.

#### SUBCHAPTER IV—AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS

7671.
Authorization of appropriations.
7672.
Sense of Congress.
7673.
Allocation of funds.
7674.
Assistance from the United States private sector to prevent and reduce HIV/AIDS in sub-Saharan Africa.

#### SUBCHAPTER V—INTERNATIONAL FINANCIAL INSTITUTIONS

7681.
Report on expansion of debt relief to non-HIPC countries.
7682.
Authorization of appropriations.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

DAY HIGH

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

SEPTEMBER 2020 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: October 19, 2020

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

SAN ANDREAS ON THE SAN JOAQUIN RIVER
GLD-367 NOT PRECEDENTIAL

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT

___________

No. 13-3041

___________

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

v.

DIODAYAN LEDESMA-CUESTA,

 Appellant

____________________________________

On Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania

(D.C. Criminal No. 2:01-cr-00374-001)

District Judge: Honorable Stewart Dalzell

____________________________________

Submitted for Possible Summary Action 

Pursuant to Third Circuit LAR 27.4 and I.O.P. 10.6

August 1, 2013

Before: FUENTES, FISHER and VANASKIE, Circuit Judges

(Opinion filed: August 15, 2013)

_________

OPINION

_________

PER CURIAM

Diodayan Ledesma-Cuesta appeals an order denying his 28 U.S.C. § 1651 

petition. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291. Having dealt with nearidentical appeals from Ledesma-Cuesta in the recent past, we will summary affirm for 

substantially the same reasons discussed in our August 2012 opinion. See United States 
2

v. Ledesma-Cuesta, 476 F. App’x 412, 412 (3d Cir. 2012) (nonprecedential per curiam); 

see also 3d Cir. L.A.R. 27.4; 3d Cir. I.O.P. 10.6. To the extent that Ledesma-Cuesta 

relies on Kessack v. United States, No. C05-1828Z, 2008 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 7739 (W.D. 

Wash. Jan. 18, 2008), we have previously declined to follow that case, and the Ninth 

Circuit has explicitly rejected its outcome. See United States v. Gamboa, 608 F.3d 492, 

495 (9th Cir. 2010) (explaining that Kessack is “contrary to the law of [the Ninth] 

Circuit”); Massey v. United States, 581 F.3d 172, 174 n.2 (3d Cir. 2009) (per curiam).
<PAGE>   1

                                   EXHIBIT 11
                          Flagstar Capital Corporation
                      Computation of Net Earnings per Share


Net earnings for earnings per share are computed by subtracting from the
applicable earnings the dividend requirements on preferred stock to arrive at
earnings available to common stock and dividing this amount by the weighted
average number of common stock outstanding during the period.

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>

                                                       For the             For the               For the              For the
                                                       Quarter             Quarter             Nine Months            Period
                                                        ended               ended                 ended                ended
                                                     September 30,       September 30,         September 30,        September 30,
                                                         1999                1998                  1999                 1998
                                                   -----------------    ---------------      ----------------      --------------
<S>                                               <C>                 <C>                  <C>                   <C>
Net Earnings                                          $   1,880            $   1,865            $   5,284            $   4,298
Less: preferred stock dividends                           1,222                1,222                3,666                2,927
                                                   -----------------    ---------------      ----------------      --------------
Net income available to common stock                  $     658            $     643            $   1,618            $   1,371
                                                   =================    ===============      ================      ==============

Average common shares outstanding                     1,000,000            1,000,000            1,000,000              774,858

Net earnings per share - basic                        $    0.66            $    0.64            $    1.62            $    1.77

Net earnings per share - diluted                      $    0.66            $    0.64            $    1.62            $    1.77
</TABLE>



























                                       11