# EUR-Lex - 52013DC0886 - EN

*|*

# 52013DC0886

**COMMUNICATION FROM THE COMMISSION A roadmap for completing the single market for parcel delivery Build trust in delivery services and encourage online sales /* COM/2013/0886 final */**

			*

			*

1) Developing e-commerce through improved delivery services

E-commerce is one of the main drivers of a
more prosperous and competitive Europe, with a significant potential for contributing to economic growth and employment.
Between 2013 and 2016, e-commerce is expected to reach an annual growth rate of
more than 10 per cent across the EU.

Levels of e-commerce vary greatly across EU Member States. Whereas
82% of internet users in the UK bought something online in 2012, only 11% of
internet users in Romania did so. EU cross-border e-commerce is growing more
slowly than domestic e-commerce: while 54% of EU internet users had bought
online from an e-retailer from their own country in 2012, only 14% had bought
online from a cross-border e-retailer[1].
A similar situation pertains to enterprises, with 14% of all enterprises having
made electronic sales to their own country and only 6% to other EU countries[2].

The European Commission’s Communication on
e-commerce together with other EU initiatives[3]
identified the physical delivery[4]
 of goods ordered online as one of the key elements for e-commerce growth. Delivery
services offered by e-retailers are one of the fundamental factors influencing
a consumer’s decision to shop with them. Currently, delivery and product returns
are amongst the top concerns of both e-shoppers and e-retailers in the EU[5]. The Commission’s Green Paper of November 2012 on ‘an integrated parcel
delivery market for the growth of e-commerce in the EU’ set out the main issues
to be tackled.  It placed particular emphasis on the cross-border
delivery of parcels[6],
on the needs of SMEs, as well as on less advanced and accessible regions,
arguing that e-commerce must be accessible to all citizens and businesses,
regardless of their size and location.

Following the adoption of the Green Paper, a
broad consensus has emerged among all parties concerned, both on the issues
identified and on the urgent need to address them. Delivery operators,
e-retailers and consumer organisations have engaged in constructive discussions
at various dedicated conferences and other fora. Many operators have started to
develop solutions that might better correspond to the expectations of their
customers.

Through this Roadmap, the Commission aims to
ensure that tangible improvements are made as quickly as possible. Action is
required to provide e-retailers and consumers with high-quality,
accessible and affordable parcel delivery services in cross-border
delivery, taking due account of the needs of SMEs and of less advanced or accessible
regions (including outermost regions[7]).
 Building on the progress already made since the
adoption of the Green Paper, the Roadmap aims to guide and organise the way
forward within three main objectives:

Increased transparency and information for all actors along the
  e-commerce value chain 
 Improved availability, quality and affordability of delivery
  solutions

· Enhanced complaint handling and redress mechanisms for consumers

The Roadmap attributes specific tasks and
roles to the various stakeholders. The Commission will facilitate this
collaborative process through dedicated fora and workshops, and will closely monitor
progress. It will take stock after 18 months in order to assess whether
additional measures are needed.

2) An incomplete market for cross-border
parcel delivery

Main challenges experienced by
consumers and e-retailers

The responses to the Green
Paper consultation[8]
as well as
specific surveys, studies and workshops confirm that delivery is a key factor
in the overall development of e-commerce. Yet the expectations and needs of
consumers and e-retailers are not always met in terms of speed, quality, reliability or cost of delivery.
[9]
Problems with
delivery
represent the bulk of consumer complaints regarding online cross-border
transactions received by the European Consumer Centres Network. A recent study by Copenhagen Economics
confirmed that delivery-related problems heavily influence whether e-shoppers finalise their
purchases or abandon attempts to buy on-line [10]

The main problems identified can be summarised as follows:

· 
Consumers often
do not know what delivery options may be available to them, when and how a
parcel may be delivered to them, and how they can return it should they so wish.
They complain about long delivery times and the lack of information about the
delivery process. They frequently consider prices for cross-border delivery,
and delivery to rural or remote areas, as excessive. They complain about
products being damaged or not delivered at all, and about the delivery of wrong
products. They are also often unaware of available complaints and redress
mechanisms if things go wrong.

· 
E-retailers[11], in particular smaller ones, do not have sufficient information on the
delivery services potentially available to them and have a limited choice and
availability of delivery solutions of the quality (e.g. track-and-trace
functionalities, flexible last-mile delivery options) and affordability
required.

E-retailers are under time pressure. The viability of their business
depends on the ability of the delivery sector to deliver at low cost, and in a
convenient manner. This applies in particular to smaller players on the
e-commerce market. Due to lower volumes, they have insufficient bargaining
power to obtain substantial discounts from delivery operators and are thus
confronted with less favourable delivery options. At the same time, they lack
capacity to invest in a delivery network of their own. In an environment
characterised by economies of scale, they are not able to be competitive
vis-à-vis larger e-retailers.

Delivery operators have to find appropriate responses
to the changing delivery expectations of their customers, while taking into
account challenges such as the high costs of the 'first' and the 'last' mile,
or the VAT exemption for public postal services. Cross-border delivery
operations are affected by a high number of additional regulatory and
administrative requirements, including customs[12],
and the lack of interoperability between delivery companies (e.g. in terms of
track and trace, or common labelling systems).

The changing regulatory environment

The regulatory framework for postal services
as set out in the Postal Services Directive[13] (hereafter: PSD)
focuses primarily on letter mail and on safeguarding the universal postal service
in Member States. A number of provisions, in particular within the scope of
universal service requirements, are nevertheless relevant to parcel delivery. In
practice, (only) 5-10% of cross-border parcel delivery flows fall under the universal
service provisions because the minimum requirements of the PSD cover only the basic
or so-called “over the counter” (thus mainly C2C) parcel services. Minimum
universal service obligations are spelled out in Art. 3 of the Directive but Member States can go beyond these requirements. In addition, general provisions on consumer
protection or the collection of statistical data also apply to parcel delivery
services which all delivery operators – including postal operators – provide
outside the scope of the universal service. In early 2014, the European
Commission will publish an implementation report which will assess the
effectiveness and relevance of the PSD in the context of a rapidly changing
market environment.

European consumers will further benefit, as
from 13 June 2014, from the implementation of the Consumer Rights Directive
(hereafter: CRD), which will significantly enhance information and transparency
in the area of online shopping. This concerns notably the elimination of hidden
charges and price transparency for distance and off-premises contracts; better
refund rights (e.g. reimbursement of delivery costs where applicable) and clear
information requirements concerning the costs of returning purchased items in
case of a withdrawal. The recently adopted instruments on Alternative and
Online Dispute Resolution (ADR and ODR) will further improve dispute
resolution mechanisms.[14]

Environmental and transport aspects are important for the sustainable development of delivery services
and for the reduction of the high costs of the 'first' and 'last' mile
services.[15] 
Any action proposed under this Roadmap should be fully coherent with related
initiatives, notably in the context of the 2011 Transport White Paper[16], and any
follow-up initiatives (such as the e-freight initiative), or actions on city
logistics, sustainable urban mobility planning (SUMP), air (noise/quality)
regulation, as well as initiatives concerning customs procedures.

As regards social aspects, the demands
of e-commerce in terms of flexibility, capacity and complexity have significant
implications for employment conditions. Innovation in delivery companies and
new business models could require changes in terms of jobs and working skills.
Social partners play an important role in safeguarding responsible employment
conditions and, at EU level, different projects and programmes are being
developed[17]
which will also be continued as part of a regular dialogue within the framework
of the European social dialogue committee for postal services, together with
the reporting and promotion of best practices.

The need for action beyond the regulatory
framework

The existing EU regulatory framework does not,
however, address the full set of problems set out above. The lack of
inter-operability between delivery operators is in fact much less a
consequence of regulatory fragmentation than of traditional operational structures.
Traditional (letter) postal markets have always been dominated by domestic
traffic, and operational processes, including IT systems, have been optimised
in the light of domestic circumstances. In the past cross-border flows
concerned mainly letter mail, and the PSD has helped ensure that the quality of
those flows has increased significantly over time. By contrast, cross-border
parcel flows – especially B2C – have not played any significant role prior to the
emergence of e-commerce.

The growing demand to provide high quality
and affordable cross-border B2C parcel services therefore represents both a new
challenge for traditional postal operators – and at the same time one of
the most promising growth markets at times of steadily declining letter volumes.
These operators are currently in the process of reorienting their processes
towards efficient, traceable and yet affordable (cross-border) parcel delivery
services.

Private parcel and express operators also need to adapt to the rapid growth of e-commerce driven B2C
shipments, both nationally and across borders. These operators –who still
dominate the cross-border parcel markets – need in particular to adapt their
B2B oriented operations to the needs of individual customers, investing in
sorting capacities, retail networks and parcel return systems.

In this context, this Roadmap aims to foster
(on-going) improvements in both business models, and therefore also competition
between the various players on the delivery market, for the benefit of
e-retailers, final customers, and the economy at large.

3) The way forward: A Roadmap with actions for the next 18 months

An industry led process

The e-commerce driven cross-border parcel
delivery market is characterised by rapid growth and innovation, but also by
signs of some market failures, for instance in terms of information
asymmetries. This Roadmap aims to reconcile the potential of market forces to
bring about efficient solutions with the need to preserve crucial public policy
interests – e.g. access to the benefits of e-commerce for less powerful players
such as SMEs and inhabitants of remote/rural areas.

Following the identification of clear public
policy objectives in the 2012 Green Paper, a group of postal operators and the International
Post Corporation (IPC) recently made a series of commitments in some of the
areas covered by the Green Paper (i.e., better information to e-retailers; efficient
return solutions; track-and-trace functionalities for lighter parcels; improved
labelling systems and better linked-up consumer complaint handling).

The Commission welcomes these commitments, as
they appear to pave the way towards tackling a number of the issues addressed
both in the Green Paper and in this Roadmap. It will closely monitor and assess
the implementation of these commitments, and the extent to which they
effectively address the needs and expectations of e-retailers and their
customers. It should be noted that, as relevant as these commitments are, they
do not address all the challenges identified in this Roadmap, nor do they bind
or include all operators in the parcel delivery industry. In its final
assessment, the Commission will also examine to what extent the solutions implemented
by any part of the delivery industry will ensure a sufficient degree of
inter-connectivity of other operators on the market (e.g. through open
standards and/or non-discriminatory access) in order to provide e-retailers
with effective cross-border delivery services.

It is also evident that some of the
above-mentioned objectives cannot be achieved by delivery operators alone.
Complementary (self-regulatory) action will be required from e-retailers, as
well as from Member States and their regulatory bodies.

Implementation, monitoring, follow-up

The Commission will work closely with all of
these stakeholders to make sure that the various work streams outlined below
are implemented as quickly and effectively as possible.

During the implementation period and process,
the Commission will take a number of facilitating measures. Given that the
needs and expectations of e-retailers and consumers are central to this
Roadmap, the Commission will liaise closely with them to ensure that any
solutions developed in the context of this Roadmap are as relevant for them as
possible. The Postal User Forum, organised by the Commission on an
annual basis, will play a particularly important role in this context.

With regard to the industry-driven actions,
the Commission will facilitate and monitor progress by organising dedicated
workshops. These will involve all potentially concerned and
interested delivery operators, experts in delivery operations and
representatives of e-retailers and consumers. Through these workshops, the
Commission will (i) ensure that all relevant stakeholders are involved in the
process, (ii) seek consensus on the precise nature of the tasks to be
accomplished, and (iii) take stock of progress achieved.

Concerning those actions that involve Member
States, regulators and competition authorities, the Commission will organise
regular discussions at the meetings of the European Regulators Group for
Postal Services, the Member States Committee set up under the PSD,
and the Expert Group set up under the E-commerce Directive. Regular
meetings and information exchanges on the social and environmental dimensions
as well as on transport-related issues in the broader context will continue
with the social partners and in particular with the European social dialogue
committee for postal services.

The Commission will monitor developments
during an 18 months period from the publication of this Roadmap. If
certain actions have not been fully accomplished by then, or if they have not
proven to be sufficiently effective in the light of the objectives identified,
the Commission will consider appropriate corrective or additional actions to
remedy market failures.

All the actions proposed to be taken up by
the Commission in this document are consistent and compatible with the current Multiannual
Financial Framework (MFF) (2007-2013) and the new MFF 2014-2020. All actions are
without prejudice to the application of the EU competition rules. While most of
the actions are focused on the B2C aspects, some may also be applicable in the
B2B context.

Objective I: Increase
transparency, information and information exchange for all actors along the
e-commerce value chain

The consumer is the 'initiator' of any online purchase
but is not necessarily in a position to control the delivery of goods ordered.
This is because delivery is based on a contract between the e-retailer and the
delivery operator(s). Providing sufficient, clear and comprehensive information
on the range and characteristics of the services provided will help consumers
to overcome their concerns about delivery. The full implementation of the
Consumer Rights Directive will ensure that consumers are much better informed
about prices in particular (e.g. for returns). Yet e-retailers are well advised
to go beyond legal information requirements where customers so desire.

E-retailers need to respond to the expectations of consumers not only with
regard to information, but also by offering simple, affordable and reliable
shipping services. A number of appropriate delivery
solutions are already available on the market, but they are often unknown to
e-retailers, especially SMEs.[18]
E-retailers need better information about available
delivery services, alternative delivery operators, consolidation options and
intermediaries, and key performance indicators (on speed, return features,
tariff levels, etc.).

At the same time, the overall information on
(cross-border) parcel markets
and services need to be enhanced. The parcel delivery
market is currently non-transparent. Data
on parcels, notably on volumes, tariffs and terminal payments[19],
is not available for regulators or other competent bodies, because postal
operators do not publish or provide data that is outside the scope of the USO
(parcel) regime. However, the rapid development of e-commerce
calls for more transparency of (cross-border) parcel flows so as to make the
supervisory framework fit for purpose, to allow for clear market definitions
and to monitor whether fair competition is being ensured.

Established delivery
companies as well as new market entrants need a predictable regulatory
environment. Recent studies and reports[20]
and contributions to the Green Paper have confirmed that entry barriers still
exist for certain postal delivery markets. Alternative postal operators as well
as e-retailers argue that there is room for improvement with regard to the
application of the PSD. The application of the national provisions implementing
the Postal Services Directive is very much focused on the provision of letter
mail services and safeguarding the provision of universal service. National regulators, national competition
authorities and the Commission will need to be in a position to identify
regulatory concerns and distortions of competition in parcel delivery markets
and to apply corrective measures where necessary. Competition
concerns could for example arise with regard to abuses of market power, such as
illegal cross-subsidies, unjustifiably high prices (i.e. in violation of the
principles of Article 14(3)(b)(iv) of the PSD), predatory tariffs for
(cross-border) parcel delivery or unjustified refusal of access to delivery
networks or their key elements (e.g. address database).

Art. 22a of the PSD obliges Member States to
ensure that postal service providers provide "all the information, in
particular to the national regulatory authorities, including
financial information and information concerning the provision of the universal
service to ensure conformity with the Directive and for (...) clearly defined
statistical purposes". Its application is not limited to the USO but it
can also be used to include information on other postal (parcel) items; neither
is it strictly limited to designated universal service providers. With regard
to paragraph 3, Member States shall ensure that national regulatory authorities
provide the Commission, upon request, with the appropriate and relevant
information necessary for it to carry out its tasks under this Directive. On
this basis, Member States should tap the full potential to ensure transparency
on the overall parcel delivery markets. The Commission will support Member
States in establishing a statistical framework which covers all relevant parcel
data. This work stream will be carried out in close co-operation with the
European Regulators Group for Postal Services (ERGP) which has already started to
reflect on a common statistical data collection methodology, which would be
applied by all national regulators.

Action 1: Improve information for consumers on the characteristics and costs of different delivery and return solutions offered on the web-sites of e-retailers E-retailers should: · provide easily understandable information on delivery and return options. Information shall cover all relevant features of the different delivery options (notably concerning the delivery period, any tracking possibilities, different options for last-mile delivery, delivery service and return solution tariffs), and their associated tariffs. This objective could be achieved inter alia by: - adopting, during the next 18 months, a (voluntary) code of conduct or code of good practice designed and followed by e-retailers. The code should address the comprehensiveness and presentation of information on delivery and return services, while ensuring that the specific needs and constraints of smaller e-retailers are taken into account: Although smaller e-retailers might find it challenging to provide such information, the provision of key minimum information appears to be in their own interest if they wish to gain the trust of their (potential) customers; - including relevant delivery requirements in the design and operation of e-commerce trust marks; - including options for consumers to provide feedback to e-retailors about their delivery experience. The Commission will: · Organise dedicated meetings with e-retailers and consumer representatives in order to support these work stream(s)  and  measure progress. Action 2: Improve information for e-retailers on the delivery services available to them While taking into account potential synergies with existing structures and related initiatives such as e.g. the eFreight initiative of the Commission[21], Delivery operators and e-retailers should (jointly): · develop a shared definition of basic concepts and features of delivery services that are based on consumer needs rather than on logistical processes. This could cover areas such as parcel dimensions (size, weight), period of delivery (speed), or additional services offered (e.g. in terms of tracking, insurance cover, etc.), and would help both e-retailers and consumers to compare offers and make informed choices. · ensure better access to information for e-retailers at national and cross-border level. Information shall include: delivery solutions available in EU Member States in terms of delivery periods (speed), tariffs, return features, general conditions of access to these services, etc.). It should include the services provided by all relevant operators, including alternative delivery operators, consolidators, parcel brokers and other intermediaries, etc. This objective could be achieved inter alia by: -  web comparison tools (on prices and/or service features); - platforms (web portals), providing e-retailers with access to publicly available information, featuring a minimum set of data and information as identified above.  Presentation tools should be open and available to all e-retailers, and any delivery operator or intermediary should be allowed to present its services through this tool based on non-discriminatory access conditions. These tools should take the consumer dimension into account. Industry is encouraged to take account of standards as developed in the e-Freight initiative context, as these standards provide the basis for developing similar web tools such as multimodal freight journey planners. The Commission will: · Organise dedicated meetings and workshops in order to bring together all relevant stakeholders, including notably private delivery operators; clarify the precise deliverables expected (including their timing), and take stock of progress achieved; · Focus the agenda of the annual Postal User Forum on the assessment of progress made. Action 3: Increased transparency on (cross border) delivery markets, delivery services and quality standards on the basis of the Postal Services Directive Member States should: · based on preparatory methodological work already being carried out by the ERGP, define a clear statistical framework, on the basis of Art. 22a of the PSD, enabling national regulatory authorities to collect relevant market data on domestic and cross-border parcel flows from all postal service providers active on the B2C and B2B parcel markets, including intermediaries, consolidators and alternative operators. Data to be collected should include at least volumes, tariffs, terminal payments, services offered, general conditions of access to the services and quality standard levels;   · take steps to ensure that users and postal service providers are regularly and transparently given sufficiently detailed information on the particular features of the universal service offered by the universal service provider(s), especially concerning basic parcel delivery services. Designated universal service providers should more clearly present different parcel delivery solutions that are part of the USO, as well as their service characteristics, including tariffs.    National regulatory authorities should: · annually publish the relevant market data on domestic and cross-border parcel flows from all postal service providers active on the B2C and B2B parcel markets, including intermediaries, consolidators and alternative operators. In parallel, the Commission will: · launch a study which will address requirements for and tools to foster transparency, e.g. through the establishment of a scoreboard on delivery performance; · address (cross-border) parcel delivery developments and challenges, in the context of the PSD implementation report, to be published in the first quarter of 2014. The Report seeks to place recent developments in the larger context of EU postal policy and the changing nature of the postal sector. While this Roadmap will provide the necessary action on parcel delivery from the e-commerce angle, the implementation report will take this dimension into account when assessing the overall situation and future challenges for the postal sector. · ensure that the European Group of Regulators for Postal Services focuses on cross-border parcels,  in particular by: -  reporting on quality of service performance and statistical data; - conducting a review to determine if there is a market failure in cross-border parcel delivery markets that may require further action.

Objective II: Improving the
availability, quality and affordability of delivery solutions

E-retailers,
notably SMEs and micro-companies located in remoter
areas or peripheral regions, can only be successful if affordable and efficient
delivery solutions are available to them.

Delivery operators, chambers of commerce and e-retailer associations
are already establishing good practices to support SMEs going online and to
enhance convenience for the final consumer.

However, in view of the constantly evolving needs and expectations
of both e-retailers and their customers, sustained innovation in delivery
processes, products and services is indispensable. Enhanced interoperability
between delivery operators is essential to further develop delivery solutions
that respond to the needs of e-retailers and consumers in terms of quality
(greater speed, efficiency, reliability), affordability and accessibility[22], and
thus ensure consumer convenience, a high quality final delivery (“last mile”)
and fully functioning return procedures.

Currently, a number of EU-level initiatives to increase
interoperability and innovative data flow solutions are being rolled out. [23]
Best practices and technological research programmes where logistics operators
and e-retailers can jointly develop projects have been adopted. Organisations
such as the IPC have recently launched further projects in this area.
Cross-border trade flows would greatly benefit from open interfaces for
information flows, inter-carrier track and trace solutions, labelling systems,
better pre-advice systems for handling incoming cross-border volumes and better/simpler
return operations. In addition, a more systematic aggregation of volumes of
small retailers would allow them to access volume discounts.

Consequently, fair competition within the EU, and the establishment
of standards enhancing inter-connected intra-EU trade flows, are bound to have
a positive impact on the EU’s international competitiveness in both the
e-commerce and delivery markets.

Enhanced co-operation at ERGP level between national regulatory
authorities will ensure that the existing regulatory instruments are better
enforced in the cross-border context.

Action 4: Promote enhanced interoperability of parcel delivery operations to support efficient cross-border trade Delivery operators and e-retailers should: develop solutions to interconnect information systems and open interfaces to allow data exchange between information systems in a multiple operator environment; in particular, they should develop cross-border solutions for tracking and tracing, labelling and related processes calling for enhanced harmonization; develop solutions for more effective returns, which may also include co-operation and consolidation options with a view to reducing the costs of last-mile delivery. All solutions envisaged should be based on open standards and infrastructures and non-discriminatory access to these. In particular, industry is encouraged to take due account of developments under the e-Freight initiative. Affordable track-and-trace solutions should be made available in particular for parcels below 2kg, which represent a significant proportion of e-commerce driven delivery. The Commission will: monitor and supervise progress on a regular basis; give a mandate to the European Committee for Standardization in accordance with Art. 20 of the PSD to develop, where feasible, voluntary standards concerning the specific features of parcel delivery services, namely a common address system in the EU.

Objective III: Improving complaint
handling and redress mechanisms for consumers

Nearly 40% of consumers indicate that problems with delivery prevent
them from shopping online[24].
Consumers are worried in particular that they will not have sufficient
protection "when delivery goes wrong", e.g. in case of non-delivery,
delivery delays or inappropriate return options.

Building on the new consumer protection legislation referred to
above, the involved parties should work together to provide consumer friendly
solutions for handling complaints and potential disputes., In this area, the IPC
is currently working on improved consumer complaint handling by linking up the
call centres of participating operators and common customer service systems for
(tracked) products, but other on-going projects should be identified and
options to build on existing solutions need to be further explored.

Action 5: Enhance consumer protection[25] Delivery operators, e-retailers and consumer associations should (jointly): · ensure better co-operation with regard to complaint handling and consumer protection systems. Member States should: · encourage the use of alternative dispute resolution mechanisms for parcel delivery services as they are being developed in the context of the implementation of the Directive on consumer ADR. The Commission will: · highlight delivery-related issues (e.g. transparency requirements concerning information on costs of delivery or return arrangements, liability of delivery operators) in the context of the forthcoming (2014) guidance on the implementation of the Consumer Rights Directive addressed to Member States' enforcement authorities; · request the European Regulators' Group for Postal Services (ERGP) to analyse consumer complaints connected to (cross-border) parcel delivery; ·  give a mandate to the European Committee for Standardization in accordance with Art. 20 of the PSD to develop (voluntary) standardisation tools for measuring complaints concerning damaged, delayed or lost parcels.

ANNEX: Table of actions

Actors: || Objective I: Increase transparency, information || Objective II: Improve availability, quality, affordability of delivery solutions || Objective III: Improving complaint handling and redress mechanisms for consumers

Delivery operators, jointly with e-retailers || Ensure better access to information on delivery solutions for e-retailers at national and cross-border level (new/enhanced information tools; common standards) || Develop solutions for better interoperability (interconnected information systems; cross-border solutions for tracking and tracing, labelling and related processes calling for enhanced standardization; more effective return solutions; “last mile” delivery) || Enhance dispute resolution mechanisms and consumer protection systems

E-retailers || Ensure appropriate information to consumers on e-retailers' Web-sites || ||

Member States, regulatory authorities || Enhanced provision of information on parcel delivery services and parcel markets at national level MS: - build on ongoing ERGP work to define statistical framework for collection of relevant market data on domestic and cross-border parcel delivery from all postal service providers - set clear national quality of service standards for (cross-border) USO parcel delivery and ensure independent monitoring; NRAs: annually publish the results of the statistical data and of the measurement of the quality of service standards || || MS: - implement and encourage the application of the information requirements for distance and off-premises contracts arising from the Consumer Rights Directive even before the actual date of the entry into force of these provisions; - develop, in line with Art. 19 of the PSD and the ADR, (Alternative Dispute Resolution) mechanisms for all parcel delivery services

European Commission || - launch study addressing transparency on parcel markets and services; - publish 5th application report on the implementation of the PSD, addressing the parcel segment comprehensively; - ask the European Group of Regulators for Postal services (ERGP) to report on quality of service performance and statistical data for parcels and to conduct a review of cross border parcel delivery markets ||  give a mandate to European standardization bodies to develop voluntary standards for common address systems || - highlight delivery-related aspects in the context of guidance on the implementation of the CRD,   published in 2014; -request the ERGP to analyse consumer complaints involved in cross border delivery; - give a mandate to  European standardization bodies to develop voluntary standards for complaints measuring

- Monitor and supervise progress on a regular basis; - Organise dedicated meetings and workshops in order to bring together all relevant stakeholders, clarify the precise deliverables expected (including their timing), and take stock of progress achieved; - Focus the agenda of the annual Postal User Forum on the assessment of progress made; - Discuss issues relevant to Member States within the Committees set up under the Postal Services and E-commerce Directives; - Ensure that the 2014/2015 work programmes of the ERGP take due account of the tasks identified in this Roadmap; - Report on progress made within 18 months from the adoption of this Roadmap; - Identify additional measures (legislative or non-legislative) should the implementation and impact of this Roadmap stay below expectations.

[1] Eurostat [isoc_ec_ibuy]]-
2012.

[2] Eurostat [isoc_ec_eseln2]
-2011, updated in December 2013.

[3]   E-commerce
communication, COM (2011) 942 final; Resolution (P7_TA(2010)0320) of 21/9/ 2010
on completing the internal market for e-commerce; Council of the EU,
Conclusions on the Digital Single Market and Governance of the Single Market,
31/5/2012; ESC opinion INT 674 of 3/2013 on the Green Paper; Resolution (
P7_TA-PROV(2012)0468) of 11/12/2012 on completing the Digital Single Market
(2012/2030(INI)).

[4] This initiative therefore
does not cover the electronic "delivery" (e.g. electronic tickets,
e-books).

[5] Consumer market study on
the functioning of e-commerce and Internet marketing and selling techniques in
the retail of goods, Study on behalf of the European Commission (EC), DG SANCO,
2011; European Cross-border E-commerce, Accenture for the European Retail Round
Table, 1/2012.

[6] This Roadmap refers to
parcels as any items (other than groceries) ordered on line and delivered to
the consumer. A parcel is defined in the widest sense and includes all items weighing
between 100g and 30 kg.

[7] The
importance of the issue for outermost regions has been underlined in the Solbes
Report and the June 2012 Commission Communication on outermost regions recalled
the need to take into account the outermost regions dimension in all proposals
linked to the Digital Single Market where relevant.

[8] [Link to Summary report
Green Paper consultation].

[9] See, for example, the 2011
"Consumer market study on the functioning of e-commerce and internet
marketing and selling techniques in the retail of goods" (on behalf of the
EC, DG SANCO).

[10] Copenhagen Economics (CE),
A study on the state of play of EU parcel markets with particular emphasis on
e-commerce, 2013, study on behalf of the EC, p.19.

[11] In this Roadmap, the term
"e-retailer" refers to any retailer who sells at least part of his
offer online and hence requires delivery services for the fulfilment of such
transactions.

[12] Customs are addressed in
the context of the preparation of the implementing rules on the Modernized
Customs Code, VAT in current revision of the VAT. None of these aspects are
specifically addressed in this Roadmap as they fall outside its scope.

[13] Directive 97/67/EC, as
amended by Directives 2002/39/EC and 2008/6/EC, OJ L 52, 27.2.2008, p.3

[14] Directive 2013/11/EU,
Directive on consumer ADR, OJ L 165, 18.6.2013, p. 63; Regulation (EU) No
524/2013, Regulation on consumer ODR, OJ L 165, 18.6.2013, p. 51.

[15] See in this context also
the joint Conclusions on Environment of the European Social Dialogue committee
for postal services, 4/4 2013.

[16] White paper "Roadmap
to a Single European Transport Area – Towards a competitive and resource
efficient transport system".

[17]
See the joint declarations of the European sectoral social partners (PostEurope
and UNI Europa Post & Logistics) concerning the evolution of the postal
sector in Europe and their on-going work on matching skills and jobs in the
European postal sector, supported by the Commission; Communications "An
Agenda for new skills and jobs. A European contribution towards full
employment" (COM(2010)682 final) and "Towards a Job-Rich
Recovery" (COM(2012)173 final).

[18]  See FTI, Study on
cross-border parcel delivery, 2011.

[19] Delivery operators that
send parcels to another country remunerate the destination delivery operator
for processing and delivering that item in cases where they do not run an
integrated delivery network. This system of remuneration will be called
terminal payments for the purpose of this document (e.g. terminal dues
represent similar remuneration in case of letter mail; under the UPU system
terminal payments for parcels are called inward land rates).

[20] WIK, The role of
Regulators, 2011; Study on the main developments in the postal sector, 2013.

[21] eFreight initiative of the
Commission; http://ec.europa.eu/transport/media/consultations/doc/2013-01-17-efreight/background.pdf,
see also the recent initiative of IPC as mentioned above (section D).

[22] Interoperability
problems, such as the existing multitude of addressing and labelling standards
and the insufficient interoperability of information systems, increase delivery
costs and thereby delivery prices paid by e-retailer.

[23] See notably the eFreight
initiatives; http://ec.europa.eu/transport/media/consultations/doc/2013-01-17-efreight/background.pdf
; CE E–Commerce Study 2013.

[24] Special Eurobarometer 398, 2013 for
2012; 47% in 2010 (Cons Focus, 11/ 2010).

[25] This Roadmap does not
include any specific actions concerning the product safety, which were already
identified in the Communication from the Commission on 20 actions for safer and
compliant products for Europe, 13.2.2013, COM(2013) 76 final.