alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
### §267a. Appointment of delegates; compensation

The President is authorized to appoint delegates, who shall be officers of the National Ocean Survey, to attend the meetings of the International Geodetic Association whenever and wheresoever the same shall be held; but no extra salary or additional compensation shall be paid to such officers by reason of such attendance.

(July 23, 1894, No. 37, 28 Stat. 587.)

#### **Executive Documents**

#### Change of Name

Coast and Geodetic Survey consolidated with National Weather Bureau in 1965 to form Environmental Science Services Administration by Reorg. Plan No. 2 of 1965, eff. July 13, 1965, 30 F.R. 8819, 79 Stat. 1318. Environmental Science Services Administration abolished in 1970 and its personnel, property, records, etc., transferred to National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration by Reorg. Plan No. 4 of 1970, eff. Oct. 3, 1970, 35 F.R. 15627, 84 Stat. 2090. By order of Acting Associate Administrator of National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, 35 F.R. 19249, Dec. 19, 1970, Coast and Geodetic Survey redesignated National Ocean Survey. See notes set out under section 311 of Title 15, Commerce and Trade.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM 50-OFF
STORES, INC.'S FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AS OF AND FOR THE THIRTEEN WEEKS ENDED
AUGUST 2, 1996, AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          AUG-02-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               AUG-02-1996
<CASH>                                             593
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                      713
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                     28,915
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                31,163
<PP&E>                                          41,390
<DEPRECIATION>                                  17,999
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  55,759
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           43,879
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           122
<OTHER-SE>                                      11,757
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    55,759
<SALES>                                         31,708
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                31,708
<CGS>                                           22,350
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   22,350
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                13,754
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 603
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (4,998)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (4,998)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (4,998)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.41)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.41)
        

</TABLE>
### §1928e. North Atlantic Assembly; appropriations for expenses of annual meeting

In addition to the amounts authorized by section 1928b of this title, there is authorized to be appropriated $50,000 for fiscal year 1977 to meet the expenses incurred by the United States group in hosting the twenty-second annual meeting of the North Atlantic Assembly. In addition to amounts authorized by section 1928b of this title, there is authorized to be appropriated $550,000 for fiscal year 1994 to meet the expenses incurred by the United States group in hosting the fortieth annual meeting of the North Atlantic Assembly. In addition to the amounts authorized by section 1928b of this title, there is authorized to be appropriated $450,000 for fiscal year 1984 to meet the expenses incurred by the United States group in hosting the thirty-first annual meeting of the North Atlantic Assembly. Amounts appropriated under this section are authorized to remain available until expended.

(July 11, 1956, ch. 562, §5, as added Pub. L. 94–350, title I, §107, July 12, 1976, 90 Stat. 824; amended Pub. L. 98–164, title I, §109(a), Nov. 22, 1983, 97 Stat. 1019; Pub. L. 102–138, title I, §168(g), Oct. 28, 1991, 105 Stat. 677.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

This section was not enacted as part of the Mutual Security Act of 1954 which comprises this chapter.

#### Amendments

1991—Pub. L. 102–138 inserted after first sentence provisions authorizing appropriation of $550,000 for fiscal year 1994 to meet expenses of the United States group in hosting the fortieth annual meeting of the North Atlantic Assembly.

1983—Pub. L. 98–164 inserted provisions authorizing additional appropriations for fiscal year 1984 to meet the expenses of hosting the annual meeting.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Change of Name

Reference to North Atlantic Assembly considered to be reference to NATO Parliamentary Assembly, see section 1000(a)(7) [div. A, title VII, §701(b)(3)] of Pub. L. 106–113, set out as a note under section 1928b of this title.
# C_2012270EN.01000301.xml

| 7.9.2012 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 270/3 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

7.9.2012

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 270/3

---

Information communicated by Member States regarding closure of fisheries

2012/C 270/03

In accordance with Article 35(3) of Council Regulation (EC) No 1224/2009 of 20 November 2009 establishing a Community control system for ensuring compliance with the rules of the common fisheries policy (1), a decision has been taken to close the fishery as set down in the following table:

1

| Date and time of closure | 10.8.2012 |
| --- | --- |
| Duration | 10.8.2012-31.12.2012 |
| Member State | Spain |
| Stock or group of stocks | PRA/N3L |
| Species | Northern prawn (Pandalus borealis) |
| Zone | NAFO 3L |
| Type(s) of fishing vessels | — |
| Reference number | FS20TQ44 |

Date and time of closure

10.8.2012

Duration

10.8.2012-31.12.2012

Member State

Spain

Stock or group of stocks

PRA/N3L

Species

Northern prawn (Pandalus borealis)

Pandalus borealis

Zone

NAFO 3L

Type(s) of fishing vessels

—

Reference number

FS20TQ44

---

(1)  OJ L 343, 22.12.2009, p. 1.

1

---
§ 404.2055 When representative payment will be stopped. If a beneficiary receiving representative payment shows us that he or she is mentally and physically able to manage or direct the management of benefit payments, we will make direct payment. Information which the beneficiary may give us to support his or her request for direct payment include the following— ( a ) A physician's statement regarding the beneficiary's condition, or a statement by a medical officer of the institution where the beneficiary is or was confined, showing that the beneficiary is able to manage or direct the management of his or her funds; or
( b ) A certified copy of a court order restoring the beneficiary's rights in a case where a beneficiary was adjudged legally incompetent; or
( c ) Other evidence which establishes the beneficiary's ability to manage or direct the management of benefits.
#### § 408.226 What happens if you begin receiving other benefit income after you become entitled to SVB?

If you begin receiving other benefit income after you become entitled to SVB, we will reduce your SVB by the amount of those payments only if you were receiving similar benefits from the same or a related source during the 12-month period before you filed for SVB. (See § 408.220(b) for a description of when we consider other benefit income to be from the same or a related source.)
## 1994 D e c i sion s O p inion s of the U nit e d S t a t e s C our t of Appe al s for the Thir d C ir c uit

8-24-1994 

# U nit ed S t a t es of Ame r ic a v

. D a ddon a

P r e c e de n t i al or N on-P r e c e de n t i al :

D ock e t 93-7338

F o l lo w thi s a nd a dd it ion al w ork s a t : h tt p://d i g it alc ommon s .l a w
. v i l l a no v a

. e du/thir dc ir c uit_1994

Thi s de c i sion i s br ou gh t t o y ou for f r e e a nd ope n a c c e s s b y the O p inion s of the U nit e d S t a t e s C our t of Appe al s for the Thir d C ir c uit a t V i l l a no v a U niv e r sit y S choo l of L a

w Di g it al R e posit or y

. I t h as be e n a c c e pt e d for inclusion in 1994 D e c i sion s b y a n a uthor i z e d a dmini s tr a t or of V i l l a no v a U niv e r sit y S choo l of L a

w Di g it al R e posit or y

. F or mor e infor m a t ion, p le as e c on t a ct Be n j a min

. C a rl s on@l a

w
. v i l l a no v a

. e du

. 

## R e c omme nde d C it a t ion

" U nit e d S t a t e s of Ame r ica v

. D a ddon a " (1994). 1994 D e cisio n s

. P a pe r 122. h tt p://d i g it alc ommon s .l a

w
. v i l l a no v a

. e du/thir dc ir c uit_1994/122

## UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT

Nos. 93-7338, 93-7351, 93-7682/83 and 93-7725

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

v.
JOHN L. "JACK" DADDONA, Appellant in Nos. 93-7338, 93-7683 and 93-7725

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

v.

SIDNEY COHEN, Appellant in Nos. 93-7351 and 93-7682

Present: Becker and Lewis, Circuit Judges , and Irenas, District Judge *

O R D E R
It appearing that although it was the intention of the Court to affirm the order appealed in No. 93-7682 in the opinion and judgment entered August 17, 1993 in appeal Nos. 93-7338, 93-7351, 93-7683 and 93-7725, see slip opinion at 12 n.12, due to a clerical error that docket number was not listed. It is hereby O R D E R E D that the caption of the August 17, 1994 opinion and judgment is amended to include docket No. 93-7682. It is further O R D E R E D that the certified judgment in lieu of formal mandate in No. 93-7682 shall issue forthwith.

By the Court,

/s/ Joseph E. Irenas District Judge Dated: September 29, 1994

## * Honorable Joseph E. Irenas, United States District Judge

for the District of New Jersey, sitting by designation.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

DAY HIGH

 615

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 506

 501

 521

 569

 580

 568

 165

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 178

 178

 164

 174

 162

 167

 303

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 341

 329

 327

 352

 327

 321

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

SEPTEMBER 2018 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: October 4, 2018

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

SAN ANDREAS ON THE SAN JOAQUIN RIVER
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY HIGH

 326

 353

 388

 377

 353

 247

 227

 200

 242

 219

 210

 238

 255

 268

 345

 385

 386

 334

 287

 277

 211

 269

 216

 281

 260

 583

 731

 654

 1,031

 714

 480

 168

 166

 165

 164

 161

 160

 158

 157

 157

 155

 152

 154

 152

 153

 153

 153

 151

 151

 154

 156

 154

 151

 152

 155

 152

 155

 155

 158

 150

 153

 156

 193

 200

 202

 202

 195

 173

 172

 167

 175

 169

 163

 170

 173

 174

 191

 199

 199

 190

 179

 174

 166

 173

 169

 173

 176

 228

 242

 230

 312

 255

 211

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

OCTOBER 2007 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: November 13, 2007

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

RIO VISTA ON THE SACRAMENTO RIVER
If this opinion indicates that it is “FOR PUBLICATION,” it is subject to revision until final publication in the Michigan Appeals Reports.

* Former Court of Appeals judge, sitting on the Court of Appeals by assignment.

- 1

- 

### S T A T E O F M I C H I G A N

C O U R T O F A P P E A L S

JON SNYDER

, P ersonal R epresentative of the ESTATE OF CHRISTINA CAROLINE SNYDER,

Plaintiff

- Appellee, UNPUBLISHED August 22, 2024

v No. 367210

Washtenaw Circuit Court CHARLES EDWARD HORN, LINDA LORRAINE HORN, and STATE FARM MUTUAL AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE COMPANY, LC No. 19

- 000769

- NI

Defendant s
,

and

CITY OF YPSILANTI

,

Defendant

- Appellant

.

Before: O’B RIEN

, P .J., and C AVANAGH and S HAPIRO * , JJ.

S HAPIRO

, J. ( dissenting ).

I respectfully dissent. In my view, this case is controlled by Martin v Rapid Inter

- Urban Transit Partnership , 480 Mich 936; 740 NW2d 657 (2007), a case the majority fails to address

and which either implicitly overruled or sharply limited the effect of Chandler v County of Muskegon , 467 Mich 315; 652 NW2d 224 (2002) and Poppen v Tovey , 256 Mich App 351; 664 NW2d 269 (2003), the two cases relied on by the majority.

In Martin

, the plaintiff claimed that she was injured when she slipped and fell on bus steps while exiting and alleged that the failure to remove ice and snow from the steps constituted negligent operation. The trial court denied summary disposition but this Court r eversed relying

on Chandler and holding that the failure to clear the steps was a failure of maintenance and did not constitute negligent operation. The Supreme Court reversed our decision and reinstated the case. It held that even though the bus in ques tion was stationary, “[t]he loading and unloading of- 2

-

passengers is an action within the ’operation‘ of a shuttle bus.” Id . In other words, whether or not the vehicle was being driven at the moment of injury was not controlling. Indeed, the condition

of the steps would seem to have no connection to driving the bus or interaction with other motor vehicles on the road. Rather, the issue was whether the use of the vehicle was “an action within the operation of” a shuttle bus. See also , Strozier v Flint Com munity Schools , 295 Mich App 82; 811 NW2d 59 (2011).

In this case, the defendant’s fire engine was blocking the right lane on I

- 94, a major highway with vehicles operating at 70 mph. The fire truck did not just happen to be “parked” there

nor had it ceas ed operation. Rather, it was engaged in an activity well within its scope of operation

– attending to accident victims and placing the vehicle in a manner intended to shield the accident scene from oncoming traffic.

I would therefore affirm the trial cou rt’s denial of summary disposition and remand for further proceedings. 1

/s/ Douglas B. Shapiro

1 The second issue, whether there was a question of fact regarding negligence was not reached by the majority. As to that issue, I would hold that the evidence presented by the plaintiff, including the testimony of its expert that the firetruck should have been on the shoulder and not in a travel lane, established a question of fact.
# C_2012206EN.01001201.xml

| 13.7.2012 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 206/12 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

13.7.2012

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 206/12

---

Update of the notification by Latvia under Article 37 of Regulation (EC) No 562/2006 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 15 March 2006 establishing a Community Code on the rules governing the movement of persons across borders (Schengen Borders Code)

The possibility for a Member State to provide by law for an obligation to hold or carry papers and documents pursuant to Article 21(c)

2012/C 206/06

LATVIA

Amendment to the information provided by Latvia and published in the OJ C 18, 24.1.2008

Amendments to the Law on the State border of the Republic of Latvia entered into force on 21 March 2012. Article 20(1) of the Law states that a person has the responsibility while in the border zone (an area no narrower than 30 km along the external land border) of keeping a document (or documents) upon their person confirming their identity and right to reside in the Republic of Latvia and of presenting the document or documents to an official of the State Border Guard upon request. This provision does not apply to a person who is an official (or member of staff) of a central or local government authority and who, in the exercise of their duties (or in their official capacity) in the border zone is able to present a service card (or work certificate) provided for in the legislation governing the operations of the relevant authority.

---
#### § 229.57 Reduction in spouse overall minimum benefit for employee annuity.

If an annuitant is entitled to both an employee annuity on his or her own earnings record and a spouse annuity on a different earnings record, the total overall minimum rates on both earnings records must be higher than the total railroad formula rates for the overall minimum to apply. The spouse overall minimum benefit amount, after adjustment for the family maximum and for age, is reduced by the employee-only overall minimum rate on the spouse's own earnings record (the employee benefit adjusted for age and social security benefits) plus the amount of any social security benefit payable to the spouse on other than the empoyee's earnings record.
---

Exhibit 32.1

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO****18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,****AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO****SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

In connection with the Annual Report of Amalgamated Pictures Corp. (the "Company") on Form 10-K for the year ending December 31, 2012, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the " Report"), I, Avery Pack, President, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.

Date: April 15, 2013

|/s/ Avery Pack                                                                                                                                                                                                           
|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                                                                                                                                                                         
|Avery Pack, President and
        Chief Executive Officer
        (Principal Executive Officer) and
        Acting Chief Financial Officer
        (Principal Financial Officer and
        Principal Accounting Officer)
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

DAY HIGH

 635

 630

 618

 600

 595

 589

 587

 549

 582

 559

 564

 546

 537

 665

 633

 622

 657

 674

 733

 763

 769

 797

 776

 818

 788

 758

 806

 791

 786

 766

 573

 532

 521

 506

 502

 525

 517

 489

 511

 513

 510

 480

 464

 451

 443

 448

 445

 432

 442

 458

 456

 469

 479

 516

 514

 506

 475

 479

 498

 496

 607

 597

 573

 563

 553

 563

 555

 532

 542

 538

 527

 517

 507

 513

 523

 506

 516

 515

 531

 541

 553

 574

 575

 600

 590

 583

 611

 589

 612

 595

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

NOVEMBER 2001 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: December 18, 2001

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

DELTA MENDOTA CANAL AT CHECK 13 (O'NEILL)
Editorial Note on Part 416
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 416 appear at 68 FR 53509, Sept. 11, 2003.

§ 416.2001 State supplementary payments; general. ( a ) *State supplementary payments; defined.* State supplementary payments are any payments made by a State or one of its political subdivisions (including any such payments for which reimbursement is available from the Social Security Administration pursuant to Pub. L. 94-23, as amended) to a recipient of supplemental security income benefits (or to an individual who would be eligible for such benefits except for income), if the payments are made: ( 1 ) In supplementation of the Federal supplemental security income benefits; *i.e.*, as a complement to the Federal benefit amount, thereby increasing the amount of income available to the recipient to meet his needs; and
( 2 ) Regularly, on a periodic recurring, or routine basis of at least once a quarter; and
( 3 ) In cash, which may be actual currency or any negotiable instrument, convertible into cash upon demand; and
( 4 ) In an amount based on the need or income of an individual or couple.
( b ) *State; defined.* For purposes of this subpart, *State* means a State of the United States or the District of Columbia.
( c ) *Mandatory minimum supplementary payments.* In order for a State to be eligible for payments pursuant to title XIX of the Act with respect to expenditures for any quarter beginning after December 1973, such State must have in effect an agreement with the Commissioner under which such State will provide to aged, blind, and disabled individuals (as defined in § 416.202) residing in the State who were recipients of aid or assistance for December 1973 as defined in § 416.121, under such State's plan approved under title I, X, XIV, or XVI of the Act, mandatory minimum supplementary payments beginning in January 1974 in an amount determined in accordance with § 416.2050 in order to maintain their income levels of December 1973. (See §§ 416.2065 and 416.2070.)
( d ) *Supplementary payments for recipients of special SSI cash benefits.* A State which makes supplementary payments (regardless of whether they are mandatory or optional and whether the payments are federally administered), has the option of making those payments to individuals who receive cash benefits under section 1619(a) of the Act (see § 416.261), or who would be eligible to receive cash benefits except for their income.
[40 FR 7640, Feb. 21, 1975, as amended at 43 FR 48995, Oct. 20, 1978; 45 FR 54748, July 18, 1980; 47 FR 15326, Apr. 9, 1982; 62 FR 38455, July 18, 1997]