alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
### §2804. Establishment of standards and criteria; publication in the Federal Register

(a) The Secretary of Commerce is hereby authorized and directed to establish and maintain standards, definitions, and criteria which are adequate to carry out the purposes of section 2802(a)(1) and section 2803(a) of this title; and

(b) Standards, definitions, and criteria established by the Secretary and such revisions in them as he may make from time to time shall be published in the Federal Register.

(Pub. L. 91–269, §4, May 27, 1970, 84 Stat. 272.)
#### Marie Russomando et al., Appellants, v. Third Avenue Railway Company et al., Respondents.

No opinion. Present — Martin, P. J., Townley, Untermyer, Dore and Callahan, JJ.
Exhibit 31.3





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


RULE 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a),


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002








I, Joseph A. Mills, certify that:





|   |                                                                                                  
|-- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|1. | I have reviewed this Amendment No. 1 to Annual Report on Form 10-K/A of Roan Resources, Inc.; and

|   |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                             
|-- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|2. | Based on my knowledge, this Amendment No. 1 to Annual Report on Form 10-K/A does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this Amendment No. 1 to Annual Report on Form 10-K/A.










April 30, 2019


/s/ Joseph A. Mills


Joseph A. Mills


Executive Chairman
§ 498.207 Discovery. ( a ) For the purpose of inspection and copying, a party may make a request to another party for production of documents which are relevant and material to the issues before the ALJ.
( b ) Any form of discovery other than that permitted under paragraph (a) of this section, such as requests for admissions, written interrogatories and depositions, is not authorized.
( c ) For the purpose of this section, the term documents includes information, reports, answers, records, accounts, papers, memos, notes and other data and documentary evidence. Nothing contained in this section will be interpreted to require the creation of a document, except that requested data stored in an electronic data storage system will be produced in a form accessible to the requesting party.
( d ) ( 1 ) A party who has been served with a request for production of documents may file a motion for a protective order. The motion for protective order shall describe the document or class of documents to be protected, specify which of the grounds in § 498.207(d)(2) are being asserted, and explain how those grounds apply.
( 2 ) The ALJ may grant a motion for a protective order if he or she finds that the discovery sought: ( i ) Is unduly costly or burdensome;
( ii ) Will unduly delay the proceeding; or
( iii ) Seeks privileged information.
( 3 ) The burden of showing that discovery should be allowed is on the party seeking discovery.
[61 FR 65469, Dec. 13, 1996]
###### Editorial Note on Part 602

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 602 appear at 71 FR 35513, June 21, 2006.

#### § 602.22 Exceptions.

If the Department determines that the QC program, or any constituent part of the QC program, is not necessary for the proper and efficient administration of a State law or in the Department's view is not cost effective, the Department shall use established procedures to advise the State that it is partially or totally excepted from the specified requirements of this part. Any determination under this section shall be made only after consultations with the State agency.
§ 404.243 Computation where you are eligible for a pension based on noncovered employment. The provisions of § 404.213 are applicable to computations under the old-start method, except for paragraphs (c) (1) and (2) and (d) of that section. Your primary insurance amount will be whichever of the following two amounts is larger: ( a ) One-half the primary insurance amount computed according to § 404.241 (before application of the cost of living amount); or
( b ) The primary insurance amount computed according to § 404.241 (before application of the cost of living amount), minus one-half the portion of your monthly pension which is due to noncovered work after 1956 and for which you were eligible in the first month you became eligible for Social Security benefits. If the result is not a multiple of $0.10, we will round to the next lower multiple of $0.10. (See § 404.213 (b)(3) if you are not eligible for a monthly pension in the first month you are entitled to Social Security benefits.) To determine the portion of your pension which is due to noncovered work after 1956, we consider the total number of years of work used to compute your pension and the percentage of those years which are after 1956 and in which your employment was not covered. We take that percentage of your total pension as the amount which is due to your noncovered work after 1956.
[52 FR 47918, Dec. 17, 1987]
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### National Aeronautics and Space Administration

          - [Notice (11-042)]

# AGENCY:

National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA).

# ACTION:

Notice of advisory committee re-establishment.

# SUMMARY:

Notice is hereby given that in accordance with the President's 2004 U.S. Space-Based PNT Policy established on December 8, 2004, and continuing and consistent Executive Branch PNT policy objectives since that time, it has been determined that an advisory board comprised of experts from outside the United States Government is necessary and in the public interest. Accordingly, NASA is re-establishing the National Space-Based PNT Advisory Board. The previous charter for the National Space-Based PNT Advisory Board expired on January 26, 2011.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

                        Mr. James J. Miller, Designated Federal Officer and Deputy Director of Policy and Strategic Communications, Office of Space Communications and Navigation, National Aeronautics and Space Administration, Washington, DC 20546, telephone 202-358-4417,                         *jj.miller@nasa.gov.*

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

The National Space-Based PNT Advisory Board will provide advice on U.S. space-based PNT policy, planning, program management, and funding profiles in relation to the current state of national and international space-based PNT services. The National Space-Based PNT Advisory Board will function solely as an advisory body and will comply fully with the provisions of the Federal Advisory Committee Act (FACA). Copies of the charter will be filed with the General Services Administration, the appropriate Committees of the Congress, and with the Library of Congress.

P. Diane Rausch,

Advisory Committee Management Officer, National Aeronautics and Space Administration.

[FR Doc. 2011-9872 Filed 4-22-11; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 7510-13-P
Notes on Groundwater Information Removed

April 1, 2013

1) Page 2 of draft

Draft sent to plant

Currently, Wateree operates two ash ponds (Ash Pond 1 and Ash Pond 2), in series, that store fly ash

and bottom ash from the wet sluicing operations. Ash Pond 1 is where the majority of the settling occurs,

while Ash Pond 2 acts as a polishing pond prior to discharge. Both the fly ash and bottom ash handling

systems have the ability to direct wet sluice to the ash ponds, even after the bottom ash conversion to

the remote SFC. Based on some groundwater monitoring results, Wateree is currently planning to close

Ash Pond 1 by 2015. As part of the closure, Wateree’s goal is to eliminate the use of the fly ash wet

sluicing system and operate the remote SFCs as a complete recycle system.

Plant comments

Currently, Wateree operates two ash ponds (Ash Pond 1 and Ash Pond 2) in series that settle fly ash and

bottom ash from the wet sluicing operations. Ash Pond 1 is where the majority of the settling occurs,

while Ash Pond 2 acts as a polishing pond prior to discharge. Both the fly ash and bottom ash handling

systems have the ability to direct wet sluice to the ash ponds, even after the bottom ash conversion to

the remote SFC. Wateree is currently planning to close Ash Pond 1 by 2021. As part of the closure,

Wateree’s goal is to eliminate the use of the fly ash wet sluicing system and operate the remote SFCs as

a complete recycle system.

2) Page 3 of draft

Draft sent to plant

Wateree started looking into bottom ash handling retrofit options after determining that wet sluicing

bottom ash to Ash Pond 1 was not a sustainable, long term solution. Wateree stated that they were

trying to anticipate what could result from the revisions to the Steam Electric ELGs. Furthermore,

Wateree aimed to close Ash Pond 1 by 2015 to improve groundwater quality.  

Plant comments

Wateree started looking into bottom ash handling retrofit options after determining that wet sluicing

bottom ash to Ash Pond 1 was not a sustainable, long‐term solution. Wateree stated that they were

trying to anticipate what could result from the revisions to the Steam Electric ELGs. Furthermore,

Wateree aimed to cease bottom ash sluicing by June 1, 2015, and close Ash Pond 1 by 2021.  

3) Page 9 of draft

Draft sent to plant

Wateree personnel stated that they are voluntarily closing Ash Pond 1, based on groundwater

monitoring results, as an effort to mitigate groundwater impacts. Wateree stated that Ash Pond 1 has

not had any impacts on surface water.

Plant comments

Wateree personnel stated that Ash Pond 1 has not had any impacts on surface water.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY HIGH

 473

 410

 334

 262

 239

 216

 205

 241

 221

 197

 228

 239

 239

 260

 266

 267

 297

 303

 284

 277

 288

 301

 314

 359

 377

 376

 383

 366

 362

 402

 402

 234

 227

 187

 165

 156

 173

 154

 159

 170

 138

 159

 160

 176

 210

 212

 211

 218

 213

 222

 228

 221

 229

 238

 280

 286

 290

 280

 290

 280

 293

 305

 332

 321

 249

 215

 198

 198

 182

 184

 194

 166

 187

 198

 211

 226

 228

 227

 239

 238

 240

 242

 250

 257

 277

 319

 330

 324

 344

 333

 327

 340

 354

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

JANUARY 2006 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: February 7, 2006

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

DELTA MENDOTA CANAL AT CHECK 13 (O'NEILL)
#### § 404.1024 Election of coverage by religious orders.

A religious order whose members are required to take a vow of poverty, or any autonomous subdivision of that religious order, may elect to have social security coverage extended to the work performed by its members in the exercise of duties required by that order or subdivision. The rules on the election of coverage by these religious orders are described in 26 CFR 31.3121(r). The rules on determining the wages of members of religious orders for which an election of coverage has been made are described in § 404.1046.
# C_2012230EN.01001201.xml

| 1.8.2012 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 230/12 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

1.8.2012

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 230/12

---

Acknowledgement of receipt of complaint No CHAP(2012) 710

2012/C 230/05

The European Commission has received and continues to receive a series of letters based on a standard form concerning the exchange of former Italian national currency against euro banknotes and coins. The European Commission has registered and will continue to register these letters under No CHAP(2012) 710.

Given the very large number of letters received on this subject, the Commission, with a view to informing all those concerned while making the most economical use of its administrative resources, is publishing the present notice in the Official Journal of the European Union in order to acknowledge receipt of the letters and inform the senders of the results of the examination of the letters by the Commission services. This notice is also published on the following Commission website:

Official Journal of the European Union

http://ec.europa.eu/community_law/complaints/receipt/index_fr.htm

All letters received draw the European Commission’s attention to the fact that Article 26 of the Italian Decree-Law No 201/2011 published in the Italian Official Gazette No 284 on 6 December 2011, with immediate application, shortened the initial deadline of 28 February 2012 to exchange the former Italian currency against the euro.

Complainants ask the European Commission and the relevant authorities to intervene with the Italian Government in order for the deadline to be extended so that citizens can enjoy their right to exchange their savings in lire against euro banknotes and coins.

The Commission’s services would like to inform the complainants that it is the euro-area Member States' competence to set and modify the modalities of and the deadlines for the exchange of coins and banknotes of their former currencies against the euro. The European Union has no competence in this field. Some euro-area Member States have set short deadlines for the exchange whereas others have opted for exchange unlimited in time and/or differentiate between modalities applying to the exchange of former national banknotes and those applying to former national coins.

Complainants can, if they so wish, submit their comments on the proposed closure of the procedure or any other aspect of the case which they consider appropriate within a period of 30 days from the publication of this notice. Any comments received after this time will not be taken into account.

---
#### § 61.305 Responsibilities of dependents receiving detention benefits.

A dependent having knowledge of a change of status of a missing employee shall promptly inform the Office of the change. The Office must be advised immediately by the dependent if the employee is returned home or to the place of his or her employment, or is able to be returned to the jurisdiction of the United States.
(No. 7032

#### Smith Oil Company, Claimant, *vs.*State of Illinois, Department of Transportation, Respondent.

*Opinion filed April 27, 1973.*

Smith Oil Company, Claimant, pro se.

William J. Scott, Attorney General; Saul R. Wexler, Assistant Attorney General, for Respondent.

Per Curiam.
(No. 74-CC-804

#### Mobil Oil Corporation, Claimant, *vs.*State of Illinois, Superintendent of Public Instruction, Respondent.

*Opinion filed June 27, 1974.*

*510Giffin, Winning, Linder, Newkirk, Cohen, Bodewes & Narmont, Attorney for Claimant.

William J. Scott, Attorney General; Howard W. Feldman, Assistant Attorney General, for Respondent.

Per Curiam.
Exhibit 13.2


CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER CERTIFICATION


PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350








In connection with this Annual Report of Omega Navigation Enterprises, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 20-F for the year ended December 31, 2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”) on or about the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Gregory McGrath, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1)
The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





A signed original of this written statement has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the SEC or its staff upon request.





Date: July 15, 2010











/s/ Gregory McGrath


Gregory McGrath


Chief Financial Officer (Principal Financial Officer)
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Charles EUBANKS, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 04-10937.

Conference Calendar.

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.

Decided Feb. 23, 2006.

Delonia Anita Watson, U.S. Attorney’s Office Northern District of Texas, Fort Worth, TX, for Plaintiff-Appellee.

Peter Michael Fleury, Assistant Federal Public Defender, Federal Public Defender’s Office Northern District of Texas, Fort Worth, TX, for Defendant-Appellant.

Before GARZA, DENNIS, and PRADO, Circuit Judges.

*611PER CURIAM: *

Charles Eubanks has appealed the district court’s judgment revoking his supervised release and imposing a 24-month term of imprisonment. Eubanks contends that his rights to grand jury indictment and a jury trial were violated, in light of *Blakely v. Washington,*542 U.S. 296, 124 S.Ct. 2531, 159 L.Ed.2d 403 (2004), and *United States v. Booker,*543 U.S. 220, 125 S.Ct. 738, 160 L.Ed.2d 621 (2005). He complains that the total sentence imposed by the district court exceeded the sentence he could have received under the Sentencing Guidelines for the offense of conviction and that the additional sentence was imposed on the basis of facts found by the district court by a preponderance of the evidence instead of by a jury beyond a reasonable doubt. These issues are without merit. *See United States v. Hinson,*429 F.3d 114, 116-19 (5th Cir.2005); *see also Booker,*125 S.Ct. at 764. The sentence was not imposed in violation of law and was neither unreasonable nor plainly unreasonable under the facts of this case. *See Hinson,*429 F.3d at 119-20; *see also*18 U.S.C. §§ 3559(a)(3) *&*3583(e)(3).

AFFIRMED.

*

 Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.
DENY and Opinion Filed December 14, 2020 

# S

In The 

### Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas No. 05-20-00958-CV IN RE TEXAS ALCOHOL AND BE VERAGE COMMISSION AND A. BENTLEY NETTLES, Relators Original Proceeding from the 193rd Judicial District Court Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. DC-20-16251 MEMORANDUM OPINION Before Justices Whitehill, P edersen, III, and Carlyle Opinion by Justice Whitehill Relators’ November 4, 2020 petition for writ of mandamus asks u s to compel the trial court to vacate its tem porary restraining order. Befo re the Court is relators’ November 25, 2020 agreed motion to dismiss. In their motion, re lators advise us that the parties have entered into an agreement resolving their disp utes. Accordingly, we grant the motion and dismi ss the original proceeding. T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 42.1(a)(2). Also before the Court is relators’ November 5, 2020 motion for reconsideration of the Court’s earlier denial of their motion f or temporary relief. Having dismissed the original proceeding, we also deny the moti on for–2– reconsideration as moot.

190958F.P05 /Bill Whitehill/ BILL WHITEHILL JUSTICE
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE MSX
INTERNATIONAL, INC. FORM 10-Q FOR THE PERIOD ENDED OCTOBER 3, 1999 AND IS
QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JAN-02-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               OCT-03-1999
<CASH>                                           9,125
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  242,555
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                      2,126
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               264,888
<PP&E>                                          97,174
<DEPRECIATION>                                (59,161)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 426,704
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          178,568
<BONDS>                                        227,171
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                           36,000
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             1
<OTHER-SE>                                    (19,410)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   426,704
<SALES>                                      1,023,499
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             1,023,499
<CGS>                                          945,578
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  945,578
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                48,300
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              15,349
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 14,272
<INCOME-TAX>                                     5,678
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              8,594
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     8,594
<EPS-BASIC>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0



</TABLE>
### §285l. Letter of credit form for United States Special Resources

The United States Special Resources will be provided to the Bank in the form of a nonnegotiable, noninterest-bearing, letter of credit which shall be payable to the Bank at par value on demand to meet the cost of eligible goods and services, and administrative costs authorized pursuant to section 285j(c) of this title.

(Pub. L. 89–369, §15, as added Pub. L. 92–245, §1, Mar. 10, 1972, 86 Stat. 58.)