alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Table3b, 24-hr std NAA trends

Final-Revised

AQS Data Query: 07/14/2011; Last updated: 1/11/2012

Designated Area States

EPA 

Regions

1999-2001 

Design 

Value 

(μg/m3 ) 1, 2

2000-2002 

Design 

Value 

(μg/m3) 1, 2

2001-2003 

Design 

Value 

(μg/m3) 1, 2

2002-2004 

Design 

Value 

(μg/m3) 1, 2

2003-2005 

Design 

Value 

(μg/m3) 1, 2

2004-2006 

Design 

Value 

(μg/m3) 1, 2

2005-2007 

Design 

Value 

(μg/m3) 1, 2

2006-2008 

Design 

Value 

(μg/m3) 1, 2

Allentown PA 3 37 42 42 39 36 37 37 36 Birmingham AL 4 49 44 40 40 44 44 44 39 Canton-Massillon OH 5 42 42 40 37 38 37 36 incomplete Charleston WV 3 41 40 40 36 36 37 38 36 Chico CA 9 62 60 47 46 47 56 55 69 Cleveland-Akron-Lorain OH 5 46 45 46 45 47 43 42 38 Detroit-Ann Arbor MI 5 46 45 44 43 47 44 43 37 Fairbanks AK 10 41 50 40 182 181 184 39 41 Harrisburg-Lebanon-Carlisle PA 3 44 46 47 45 41 38 38 36 Imperial County CA 9 49 50 46 40 39 40 42 36 Johnstown PA 3 35 40 41 40 39 39 39 incomplete Klamath Falls OR 10 39 55 53 55 41 46 45 46 Knoxville-Sevierville-La Follette TN 4 45 42 38 34 34 35 37 34 Lancaster PA 3 42 43 45 42 44 39 40 37 Liberty-Clairton PA 3 59 63 63 65 68 65 60 53 Logan UT-ID 8, 10 53 55 54 64 65 64 42 36 Los Angeles-South Coast Air Basin CA 9 76 73 72 67 65 57 55 53 Milwaukee-Racine WI 5 39 37 38 38 39 41 41 37 New York-N. New Jersey-Long Island NY-NJ-CT 1, 2 43 40 46 42 44 43 41 38 

Nogales AZ 9 33 29 29 29 31 38 39 40 

Oakridge OR 10 56 56 56 52 53 48 47 40 

Philadelphia-Wilmington PA-NJ-DE 2, 3 40 43 43 39 39 37 38 36 

Pittsburgh-Beaver Valley PA 3 44 45 49 52 52 45 43 39 

Provo UT 8 43 46 45 45 43 44 45 44 

Sacramento CA 9 68 60 51 49 45 49 52 54 

Salt Lake City UT 8 69 63 55 54 48 49 48 46 

San Francisco Bay Are CA 9 53 52 47 43 39 39 38 36 

San Joaquin Valley CA 9 104 90 76 62 60 64 69 70 

Seattle-Tacoma WA 10 43 44 40 41 40 42 43 44 

Steubenville-Weirton OH-WV 3, 5 47 47 46 47 46 43 44 41 

West Central Pinal County AZ 9 incomplete incomplete incomplete incomplete incomplete incomplete incomplete 48 

Yuba City-Marysville CA 9 49 42 39 34 36 40 39 47 

Notes:

Table 3b. PM2.5 Design Value History for Previously Designated Nonattainment Areas (including Maintenance Areas) for the PM2.5 

1. The level of the 2006 24-hour NAAQS for PM2.5 is 35 micrograms per cubic meter (μg/m3). The design value for the 24-hour PM2.5 NAAQS is the 3-year average 98th percentile concentration.2. The design values shown here are computed for the latest design value period using Federal Reference Method or equivalent data reported by States, Tribes, and location agencies to EPA's Air Quality System (AQS) as of 7/14/2011. Concentrations flagged by States, Tribes, and local agencies as exceptional events (e.g., high winds, wildfires, volcanic eruptions, construction) and concurred by the associated EPA Regional Office are not included in the calculation of these design values.

Page 1
CENTRAL VALLEY OPERATIONS OFFICE

CHINOOK SALMON REPORT

December 2005

Note: Bold numbers are not verified by DFG

Winter Run Chinook Salmon Estimated Loss (Incidental Take) Spring Run Chinook Salmon Estimated Loss (Incidental Take) 

Daily SWP Daily CVP Daily Combined Season Combined Daily SWP Daily CVP Daily Combined Season Combined Daily 

Tagged* No Tag Tagged* No Tag Tagged* No Tag Tagged* No Tag Tagged No Tag Tagged No Tag Tagged No Tag Tagged No Tag In C

DATE Estimated Estimated Estimated Estimated Estimated Estimated Estimated Estimated Estimated Estimated Estimated Estimated Estimated Estimated Estimated Estimated

Loss Loss Loss Loss Loss Loss Loss Loss Loss Loss Loss Loss Loss Loss Loss Loss

1-Dec-05 0000 0000 0000 0000 4,381 

2-Dec-05 0000 0000 0000 0000 4,417 

3-Dec-05 0000 0000 0000 0000 4,417 

4-Dec-05 0000 0000 0000 0000 3,300 

5-Dec-05 0000 0000 0000 0000 4,392 

6-Dec-05 0000 0000 0000 0000 5,503 7-Dec-05 0000 0000 0000 0000 6,893 8-Dec-05 0000 0000 0000 0000 6,613 9-Dec-05 0000 0000 0000 0000 6,589 

10-Dec-05 0000 0000 0000 0000 6,589 

11-Dec-05 0000 0000 0000 0000 6,590 

12-Dec-05 0008 0808 0000 0000 6,628 

13-Dec-05 0000 0008 0000 0000 6,096 

14-Dec-05 0000 0008 0000 0000 6,050 

15-Dec-05 0000 0008 0000 0000 6,077 16-Dec-05 0000 0008 0000 0000 6,057 

17-Dec-05 0000 0008 0000 0000 6,057 

18-Dec-05 0000 0008 0000 0000 3,839 19-Dec-05 0000 0008 0000 0000 5,650 

20-Dec-05 0 40 0 0 0 40 0 48 0000 0000 6,457 

21-Dec-05 0 26 0 0 0 26 0 74 0000 0000 6,950 

22-Dec-05 0000 0 0 0 74 0000 0000 7,707 

23-Dec-05 0 52 0 8 0 60 0 134 0 0 0000 7,889 

24-Dec-05 0000 0 0 0 134 0 0 0000 7,576 25-Dec-05 0000 0 0 0 134 0 0 0000 8,503 

26-Dec-05 0000 0 0 0 134 0 0 0000 8,230 

27-Dec-05 0000 0 0 0 134 0 0 0000 8,647 

28-Dec-05 0000 0 0 0 134 0 0 0000 8,736 

29-Dec-05 0000 0 0 0 134 0 0 0000 8,432 

30-Dec-05 0 39 0 0 0 39 0 173 0 0 0000 8,867 

31-Dec-05 0008 0 8 0 181 0 0 0000 8,016 

Total 0 157 0 24 0 181 0 181 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 202,149 13

Winter Run Incidental Take Levels (Oct 1 thru May 31) Spring Run Incidental Take Levels for Season Combined Total (Oct 1 thru Jun 30)Tagged Yellow Light Level = ??? SeasonTagged Red Light Level = ??? SeasonNo Tag Yellow Light Level = ??? SeasonNo Tag Red Light Level = ??? Season* This number is determined by Winter Run Length only until the tags have been read. All tags from Winter Run length fish have been read and numbers have been updated thru ????

Banks Tr
<PAGE>   1
                                   UNITED STATES
                       SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
                             WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549





   
                                   FORM 8-K/A
                               (Amendment No. 1)
    

                                 CURRENT REPORT

                     PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(D) OF THE

                         SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934



   
        Date of Report (Date of earliest event reported): April 19, 1999
    


                        LAKEHEAD PIPE LINE COMPANY, LIMITED
                                  PARTNERSHIP
             (Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)



            DELAWARE                    333-59597                 39-1715851
  (State or other jurisdiction     (Commission File No.)       (I.R.S. Employer
        of incorporation)                                    Identification No.)



       LAKE SUPERIOR PLACE, 21 WEST SUPERIOR STREET, DULUTH, MN 55802-2067
               (Address of principal executive offices) (Zip Code)


       Registrant's telephone number, including area code: (218) 725-0100

<PAGE>   2

ITEM 5.    OTHER EVENTS


   
      This amendment is being filed for the sole purpose of including the 
conformed signature that was inadvertently omitted from the EDGAR submission of 
the original filing dated April 16, 1999.
    




                                    SIGNATURE


      Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the
registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the
undersigned thereunto duly authorized.


                                       LAKEHEAD PIPE LINE COMPANY, LIMITED 
                                       PARTNERSHIP
                                                     (registrant)

                                       By:  Lakehead Pipe Line Company, Inc.
                                               as General Partner
                                                                      
   
                                            /s/ M.A. MAKI
                                            -----------------------------------
                                            M. A. Maki
                                            Chief Accountant
                                            (Principal Financial and 
                                            Accounting Officer)
    

   
Date: April 19, 1999
#### Jacob Rosenfeld, Appellant, v. Commercial Travelers Mutual Accident Association of America, Respondent.

Order unanimously affirmed, with costs and disbursements. No opinion. Present — Peck, P. J., Dore, Cohn, Callahan and Van Voorhis, JJ.
#### Catherine E. FRANCISCO, Petitioner, v. Alberto R. GONZALES, Attorney General, Respondent.

No. 04-74769.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted Feb. 13, 2006.*

Decided Feb. 22, 2006.

Richard M. Loew, Aquino *&*Aquino, Covina, CA, for Petitioner.

Ronald E. Lefevre, Chief Counsel, Office of the District Counsel Department of Homeland Security, San Francisco, CA, Oil, DOJ — U.S. Department of Justice Civil Div./Office of Immigration Lit., Washington, DC, for Respondent.

Before: FERNANDEZ, RYMER, and BYBEE, Circuit Judges.

*

 The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. *See*Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

MEMORANDUM **

Catherine E. Francisco, a native and citizen of the Philippines, petitions for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) decision summarily affirming an immigration judge’s (“IJ”) order denying Francisco’s motion to reopen removal proceedings conducted in absentia. We have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We *813review for abuse of discretion the denial of a motion to reopen. *Singh v. INS,*213 F.3d 1050, 1052 (9th Cir.2000). We deny the petition for review.

The IJ did not abuse his discretion in denying Francisco’s motion to reopen on the basis that Francisco failed to comply with the procedural guidelines set forth in *Matter of Lozada,*19 I. & N. Dec. 637 (BIA 1988). *See Reyes v. Ashcroft,*358 F.3d 592, 597 (9th Cir.2004). Contrary to Francisco’s contention, the alleged ineffectiveness of the attorney who represented her before the immigration court is not plain from the record. *Cf. Escobar-Grijalva v. INS,*206 F.3d 1331, 1335 (9th Cir.2000) (holding that the BIA’s “reasonable rules for the normal ineffective assistance claim” do not apply where facts demonstrating an attorney’s ineffectiveness were “plain on the face of the administrative record”).

PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED

**

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.
#### John E. Mullen, as Administrator, etc., Appellant, v. The Schenectady Railway Company, Respondent.

Motion denied.
### §284bb. Eighteenth replenishment

(a) The United States Governor of the International Development Association is authorized to contribute on behalf of the United States $3,291,030,000 to the eighteenth replenishment of the resources of the Association, subject to obtaining the necessary appropriations.

(b) In order to pay for the United States contribution provided for in subsection (a), there are authorized to be appropriated, without fiscal year limitation, $3,291,030,000 for payment by the Secretary of the Treasury.

(Pub. L. 86–565, §30, as added Pub. L. 115–141, div. K, title VII, §7083(b), Mar. 23, 2018, 132 Stat. 966.)
#### The People of the State of New York ex rel. Carl Joseffy, Appellant, against Commissioner of Correction of the City of New York et al., Respondents.

Relator appeals from an order dismissing a writ of habeas corpus, which had been issued to test the sufficiency of an information, filed in the New York City Magistrate’s Court, charging him with the crime of grand larceny. Order affirmed. No opinion. Hagarty, Acting P. J., Carswell, Johnston, Adel and Sneed, JJ., concur.
#### In the Matter of the Application of Timothy Foohey, as Surviving Member of the Firm of Pollard, Goff & Company, Respondent, for a Peremptory Writ of Mandamus Directed to Julius N. Shaw and Others, as Commissioners for the Drainage of Low, Wet, Swamp Lands.

Order affirmed, with costs. All concurred.
(No. 74-CC-407

#### Harry Burge, Claimant, *vs.*State of Illinois, Department of Transportation, Respondent.

*Opinion filed April 11, 1974.*

Harry Burge, Claimant, pro se.

William J. Scott, Attorney General; Howard W. Feldman, Assistant Attorney General, for Respondent.

Per Curiam.
Exhibit
32.1
 
 
 CERTIFICATION
 
 In
connection with the Annual Report of the Registrant on Form 10-K for the period
ended December 31, 2007, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on
the date hereof (the “Report”), the undersigned certify pursuant to § 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:
 
 (1)
              The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
and
 
 (2)
              The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Registrant.
 
 
 /s/
      Richard W. McCullough
                
                February 25,
      2009Richard
      W. McCulloughChairman
      and Chief Executive Officer
                  Petroleum
      Development Corporation
                  Managing
      General Partner
 
 A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document
authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears
in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required
by Section 906, has been provided the Registrant and will be retained by the
Registrant and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff
upon request.
EXHIBIT 21.1

SUBSIDIARIES OF BLACKROCK KELSO CAPITAL CORPORATION



|                       |  |              |          | 
|---------------------- |  | ------------ | -------- | 
|Name                   |  | Jurisdiction |         
|BKC ARS Blocker, Inc.  |  |              | Delaware | 
|BKC ASW Blocker, Inc.  |  |              | Delaware | 
|BKC CSP Blocker, Inc.  |  |              | Delaware | 
|BKC DVSH Blocker, Inc. |  |              | Delaware | 
|BKC MTCH Blocker, Inc. |  |              | Delaware | 
|BKC Sentry LLC.        |  |              | Delaware | 
|BKC WBS, LLC.          |  |              | Delaware | 

In addition, we may be deemed to control certain portfolio companies identified as Controlled
Investments in footnotes to the Consolidated Schedule of Investments at December 31, 2013 included in the Consolidated Financial Statements portion of BlackRock Kelso Capital Corporations Form 10-K for the year ended
December 31, 2013.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

DAY ELEV

 964.37

 963.75

 963.10

 962.51

 961.91

 961.27

 960.71

 960.14

 959.60

 959.06

 958.56

 958.06

 957.54

 957.10

 956.66

 956.20

 955.97

 955.57

 955.05

 954.66

 954.20

 953.79

 953.38

 952.44

 952.01

 951.63

 951.24

 950.94

 950.56

 950.13

 2,123.9

 2,112.8

 2,101.3

 2,090.9

 2,080.3

 2,069.0

 2,059.2

 2,049.3

 2,039.9

 2,030.4

 2,021.8

 2,013.1

 2,004.1

 1,996.5

 1,989.0

 1,981.1

 1,977.1

 1,970.3

 1,961.5

 1,954.9

 1,947.1

 1,940.2

 1,933.3

 1,917.5

 1,910.3

 1,904.0

 1,897.5

 1,892.5

 1,886.2

 1,879.1

STORAGE

-10.0

-11.1

-11.5

-10.4

-10.6

-11.2

-9.8

-10.0

-9.4

-9.4

-8.7

-8.7

-9.0

-7.6

-7.6

-7.9

-3.9

-6.8

-8.9

-6.6

-7.8

-6.9

-6.9

-15.8

-7.2

-6.3

-6.5

-5.0

-6.3

-7.1

CHANGE

 3,839

 3,352

 3,181

 3,492

 3,407

 3,242

 3,370

 3,295

 3,085

 3,324

 3,454

 3,127

 3,184

 3,101

 3,354

 3,019

 3,671

 3,337

 2,948

 3,783

 3,179

 3,244

 3,337

-937

 2,993

 3,696

 3,375

 4,280

 3,641

 2,998

INFLOW

 8,711

 8,794

 8,858

 8,585

 8,585

 8,763

 8,158

 8,162

 7,739

 7,885

 7,656

 7,398

 7,616

 6,901

 7,055

 5,062

 5,506

 6,662

 7,273

 7,075

 6,996

 6,609

 6,811

 6,912

 6,545

 6,788

 6,483

 6,698

 6,753

 6,511

POWER

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

SPILL

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 1,856

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

OUTLET

 174

 131

 146

 167

 161

 145

 154

 149

 97

 189

 173

 101

 91

 25

 106

 75

 150

 110

 140

 40

 109

 124

 5

 98

 74

 93

 161

 93

 53

 68

C.F.S.

 .33

 .25

 .28

 .32

 .31

 .28

 .30

 .29

 .19

 .37

 .34

 .20

 .18

 .05

 .21

 .15

 .30

 .22

 .28

 .08

 .22

 .25

 .01

 .20

 .15

 .19

 .33

 .19

 .11

 .14

INCHES

 .16

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .14

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

PRECIP

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

SEPTEMBER 2007 SHASTA LAKE DAILY OPERATIONS RUN DATE: October 16, 2007

IN LAKE

EVAPORATION

INCHES

C.F.S.

COMPUTED*

1000 ACRE-FEET

RELEASE - C.F.S.

RIVER

TOTALS -254.9 96,371 219,550 0 1,856 3,402 6.72 .30

ACRE-FEET -254,900 191,152 435,477 0 3,681 6,748

COMMENTS:

* COMPUTED INFLOW IS THE SUM OF CHANGE IN STORAGE, RELEASES AND EVAPORATION.

SUMMARY

RELEASE (ACRE-FEET)

POWER 435,477

SPILL 0

OUTLET

TOTAL

 3,681

 439,158

PRECIPITATION

THIS MONTH =

TO DATE =

 .30

JULY 1, 2007 2.99

 2,133.9
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1999
<CASH>                                         125,137
<SECURITIES>                                   453,395
<RECEIVABLES>                                   42,147
<ALLOWANCES>                                     1,663
<INVENTORY>                                      6,982
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               646,547
<PP&E>                                         161,825
<DEPRECIATION>                                  76,546
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 980,503
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           36,264
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           226
<OTHER-SE>                                     817,020
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   980,503
<SALES>                                        193,051
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               193,051
<CGS>                                           74,760
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   74,760
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 8,029
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  2,908
<INCOME-TAX>                                     1,732
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              1,176
<DISCONTINUED>                                (21,449)
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (20,273)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (0.90)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.90)


</TABLE>
RESPONDED ON NOVEMBER 30, 2009 4:53 PM 

Greg Principato, President, Airports Council International-North 

America 

I firmly believe that the Federal Advisory Committee announced by DOT Secretary 

LaHood can make a difference if they have a clear mission and broad aviation 

representation. 

Why am I so confident? Because I served as Executive Director on the Commission to 

Ensure a Strong Competitive Airline Industry (National Airline) Commission in 1993. 

While most of our recommendations were not implemented, they were certainly forward 

looking - including our emphasis on modernization of the air traffic control system. 

In order to chart a successful future way forward for the aviation industry, I believe the 

following five issues must be addressed: 

• The critical need for investment in airport infrastructure and air traffic 

modernization; 

• The development of a sustainable funding system for aviation, given the fact that 

receipts for the Airport & Airways Trust Fund continue to decline and the ever 

increasing airline fees do not contribute to the Trust Fund; 

• Consumer issues including ensuring airline competition, the continuation of 

small community air service and more disclosure of consumer information to 

passengers before they purchase their tickets; 

• The full range of aviation environmental issues including climate change, noise, 

water quality and biofuels; and; 

• Ensuring international competitiveness through additional open skies 

agreements, as well as a level playing field for U.S. manufacturers of aircraft and 

systems. 
Greg Principato, President 

Airports Council International-North America
EXHIBIT - 32


                CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                       AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906
                        OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



        In connection with the Quarterly Report of Realmark Property Investors
Limited Partnership - III (the "Partnership") on Form 10-Q for the period ending
September 30, 2003 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the
date hereof (the "Report"), I, Joseph M. Jayson, Individual General Partner and
Principal Financial Officer, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the
best of my knowledge:

         (1)      The Report fully complies with the requirements of
                  section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
                  1934; and

         (2)      The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
                  all material respects, the financial condition and result of
                  the operations of the Partnership.


        November 14, 2003                        /s/ Joseph M. Jayson
        -----------------                        ------------------------------
              Date                               Joseph M. Jayson,
                                                 Individual General Partner and
                                                 Principal Financial Officer
§ 654.412 Bathing, laundry, and hand washing. ( a ) Bathing and hand washing facilities, supplied with hot and cold water under pressure, must be provided for the use of all occupants. These facilities must be clean and sanitary and located within 200 feet of each living unit.
( b ) There must be a minimum of 1 showerhead per 15 persons. Showerheads must be spaced at least 3 feet apart, with a minimum of 9 square feet of floor space per unit. Adequate, dry dressing space must be provided in common use facilities. Shower floors must be constructed of nonabsorbent nonskid materials and sloped to properly constructed floor drains. Except in individual family units, separate shower facilities must be provided each sex. When common use shower facilities for both sexes are in the same building they must be separated by a solid nonabsorbent wall extending from the floor to ceiling, or roof, and must be plainly designated “men” or “women” in English and in the native language of the persons expected to occupy the housing.
( c ) Lavatories or equivalent units must be provided in a ratio of 1 per 15 persons.
( d ) Laundry facilities, supplied with hot and cold water under pressure, must be provided for the use of all occupants. Laundry trays or tubs must be provided in the ratio of 1 per 25 persons. Mechanical washers may be provided in the ratio of 1 per 50 persons in lieu of laundry trays, although a minimum of 1 laundry tray per 100 persons must be provided in addition to the mechanical washers.