alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 78 (Friday, April 22, 2011)]
[Notices]
[Page 22677]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2011-9802]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration

RIN 0648-XA388


North Pacific Fishery Management Council; Public Meeting

AGENCY: National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and 
Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), Commerce.

ACTION: Notice of a public meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The North Pacific Fishery Management Council's Groundfish Plan 
Team will meet via teleconference in Juneau, AK, Seattle, WA and 
Anchorage, AK. Note the meeting starts at 1:30 p.m. (ADT)/2:30 PDT, but 
the lines will open \1/2\ hour prior to the official start, check out 
the Council Web site at http://www.alaskafisheries.noaa.gov/npfmc/ for 
WebEx, meeting numbers and passwords.

DATES: The session will start at 1:30 p.m. (ADT) on Tuesday, May 17, 
2011.

ADDRESSES: The session will be held at the Auke Bay Laboratory, 17385 
Glacier Highway, Juneau, AK; Anchorage Council office, Old Federal 
Building, Room 205, Anchorage, AK; Alaska Fishery Science Center 
(AFSC), Traynor Room, 7600 Sand Point Way NE., Seattle, WA.
    Council address: North Pacific Fishery Management Council, 605 W. 
4th Avenue, Suite 306, Anchorage, AK 99501-2252.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Council staff contact, Jane DiCosimo; 
telephone: (907) 271-2809.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The teams will be reviewing proposals for 
model runs for GOA and BSAI Pacific cod and making recommendations to 
the author for those that will be reviewed at the August 2011 
Groundfish Plan Team meeting. Proposed model runs include those by the 
author, BSAI Plan Team, GOA Plan Team, Science and Statistical 
Committee, CIE reviewers (tentative) and the public. Joint Plan Team 
recommendations from this May 2011 meeting will be reviewed by the 
author with the SSC in June 2011. The deadline for proposing models had 
been extended to April 29 to allow the public an opportunity to 
consider the results of the CIE reviews, which are due April 22. 
Proposals should be submitted to Grant Thompson, AFSC, 7600 Sand Point 
Way NE., Building 4, Seattle, WA.

Special Accommodations

    These meetings are physically accessible to people with 
disabilities. Requests for sign language interpretation or other 
auxiliary aids should be directed to Gail Bendixen at (907) 271-2809 at 
least 7 working days prior to the meeting date.

    Dated: April 19, 2011.
Tracey L. Thompson,
Acting Director, Office of Sustainable Fisheries, National Marine 
Fisheries Service.
[FR Doc. 2011-9802 Filed 4-21-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-22-P
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY HIGH

 76

 76

 74

 73

 76

 74

 72

 71

 70

 72

 71

 72

 71

 74

 75

 68

 68

 72

 67

 68

 67

 67

 67

 66

 68

 67

 68

 67

 65

 67

 66

 61

 43

 45

 41

 54

 55

 46

 56

 48

 51

 47

 48

 47

 45

 49

 54

 45

 39

 45

 40

 49

 40

 45

 59

 49

 44

 51

 39

 43

 39

 38

 70

 69

 68

 67

 67

 66

 65

 66

 65

 66

 66

 66

 65

 67

 67

 62

 63

 64

 63

 63

 62

 64

 63

 63

 64

 62

 63

 61

 60

 59

 59

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

OCTOBER 2011 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: November 9, 2011

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

SAN ANDREAS ON THE SAN JOAQUIN RIVER
#### In the Matter of the Accounting of John F. X. Harley et al., as Executors of Agnes Scholz, Deceased, Appellants. Charles A. Scholz, Respondent.

Decree of the Surrogate’s Court, Queens County, settling the final account of executors, so far as appealed from, reversed on the law and the facts, with costs to' appellants, payable out of the estate, and the matter remitted to the Surrogate’s Court with directions to enter a decree in accordance herewith. It is our opinion that the intent of the testatrix was to divide her net estate into three equal parts, and to create a trust for life for the respondent in one of those parts, with the right of election to respondent to take from that one third a sum not to exceed $5,000. Upon exercise of that elective right by respondent, payment to him was limited to the one third of the net estate so directed to be set aside in trust for him. The second objection to the account of the executors filed by the respondent is overruled. Lewis, P. J., Johnston, Adel, Sneed and Wenzel, JJ., concur.
Document headings vary by document type but may contain
                    the following: the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document
the number of the CFR title and the number of each part
                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly
                      related to
the agency docket number / agency internal file number
the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in
                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory
                      Actions See the
                    Document Drafting Handbook
                    for more details.
 Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation
 AGENCY: Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation.
 ACTION: Update Listing of Financial Institutions in Liquidation.
 SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given that the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (Corporation) has been appointed the sole receiver for the following financial institutions effective as of the Date Closed as indicated in the listing. This list (as updated from time to time in the 
                        **Federal Register**
                        ) may be relied upon as “of record” notice that the Corporation has been appointed receiver for purposes of the statement of policy published in the July 2, 1992 issue of the 
                        **Federal Register**
                         (57 FR 29491). For further information concerning the identification of any institutions which have been placed in liquidation, please visit the Corporation Web site at 
                        *http://www.fdic.gov/​bank/​individual/​failed/​banklist.html*
                         or contact the Manager of Receivership Oversight in the appropriate service center. Dated: April 18, 2011. Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation. Pamela Johnson, Regulatory Editing Specialist.
 Institutions in Liquidation
[In alphabetical order]
FDIC Ref. No.
Bank name
City
State
Date closed10353
Bartow County Bank
Cartersville
GA
04/15/201110354
Heritage Banking Group
Carthage
MS
04/15/201110355
New Horizons Bank
East Ellijay
GA
04/15/2011( print page 22705)10356
Nexity Bank
Birmingham
AL
04/15/201110357
Rosemount National Bank
Rosemount
MN
04/15/201110358
Superior Bank
Birmingham
AL
04/15/2011


[FR Doc. 2011-9788 Filed 4-21-11; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 6714-01-P
```

[Congressional Bills 114th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 4217 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

114th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 4217

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to determine eligibility for 
health insurance subsidies without regard to amounts included in income 
                 by reason of conversion to a Roth IRA.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           December 10, 2015

   Mr. Bera introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                      Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to determine eligibility for 
health insurance subsidies without regard to amounts included in income 
                 by reason of conversion to a Roth IRA.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. ELIGIBILITY FOR HEALTH INSURANCE SUBSIDIES DETERMINED 
              WITHOUT REGARD TO AMOUNTS INCLUDED IN INCOME BY REASON OF 
              CONVERSION TO ROTH IRA.

    (a) In General.--Section 36B(d)(2)(B) of the Internal Revenue Code 
of 1986 is amended--
            (1) by redesignating clauses (i), (ii), and (iii) as 
        subclauses (I), (II), and (III), respectively, and by adjusting 
        the indentation of such subclauses accordingly,
            (2) by striking ``adjusted gross income increased by--'' 
        and inserting ``adjusted gross income--
                            ``(i) increased by--'',
            (3) by striking the period at the end and inserting ``, 
        and'', and
            (4) by adding at the end the following new clause:
                            ``(ii) decreased by any amount included in 
                        gross income to which section 408A(d)(3)(A)(i) 
                        applies.''.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendments made by this section shall 
apply to taxable years beginning after December 31, 2013.
                                 <all>
```
**EXHIBIT 31.2****WRITTEN STATEMENT OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF2002**I, Y. Tristan Kuo, certify that:1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Cuisine Solutions, Inc.;2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement of a materialfact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of thecircumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this quarterly report;3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included inthis quarterly report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results ofoperations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterlyreport;4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintainingdisclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) forthe registrant and have:a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls andprocedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating tothe registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others withinthose entities, particularly during the period in which this quarterly report is being prepared;b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures andpresented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls andprocedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; andc) disclosed in this quarterly report any change in the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter that hasmaterially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internalcontrol over financial reporting; and5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the auditcommittee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internalcontrol over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect theregistrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and     b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have asignificant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.Date: October 26, 2006      /s/ Y. Tristan Kuo   Y. Tristan Kuo  Chief Financial Officer, Treasurer  and Corporate Secretary  
25
491 P.2d 1087

#### Billy GARRETT by John D. Garrett, his father, natural guardian and next friend, and John D. Garrett, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. NISSEN CORPORATION, an Iowa Corporation, Defendant-Appellee.

No. 655.

Court of Appeals of New Mexico.

Dec. 20, 1971.

James L. Brown, John F. Loehr, Farmington, for plaintiffs-appellants.

Bruce D. Hall, Rodey, Dickason, Sloan, Akin & Robb, Albuquerque, for defendantappellee.

*333'CERTIFICATION TO THE SUPREME COURT

HENDLEY, Judge.

Pursuant to § 16-7-14(C) (2), N.M.S.A. 1953 (Repl.Vol.1970) the Court of Appeals is authorized to certify to the Supreme Court issues of substantial public interest that should be determined by the Supreme Court.

It appearing that certiorari has been granted by the New Mexico Supreme Court in the case of Sister Mary Assunta Stang, Personal Representative and Ancillary Administratrix with the Will Annexed in the Matter of the Last Will and Testament of Catherine Lavan, Deceased; Sister Fidelis O’Connor: Sister James Agnes Hayes: and Sister Mary Dorothy Schmidt v. Hertz Corporation, a corporation, and is now pending in that court as Cause No. 9324 and,

It further appearing that certiorari was granted in that case upon a petition alleging that the issue of strict liability in tort was of substantial public interest and should be determined by the Supreme Court and,

It further appearing that the issue of strict liability in tort is an issue to be decided in the above captioned case.

Now, therefore, pursuant to § 16-7-14 '(C) (2), supra, the above captioned case is hereby certified to the New Mexico Supreme Court for decision.

SUTIN and COWAN, JJ., concur.
### §2799. Purpose

The purpose of this subchapter is to authorize the President to support, consistent with the CFE Treaty, a NATO equipment transfer program that will—

(1) enhance NATO's forces,

(2) increase NATO standardization and interoperability, and

(3) better distribute defense burdens within the NATO alliance.

(Pub. L. 90–629, ch. 9, §91, as added Pub. L. 102–228, §2, Dec. 12, 1991, 105 Stat. 1691.)
I 

114TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 4310 

To amend the Immigration and Nationality Act to direct the Secretary of 

Homeland Security to check an alien’s interactions on and posting of 

material to the Internet prior to the issuance of a visa, and for other 

purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

DECEMBER 18, 2015 

Mr. SALMON (for himself, Mr. MILLER of Florida, and Ms. SINEMA) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on the Judiciary 

A BILL 

To amend the Immigration and Nationality Act to direct 

the Secretary of Homeland Security to check an alien’s 

interactions on and posting of material to the Internet 

prior to the issuance of a visa, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Vet Electronic Trails 

5 Act of 2015’’. 


SSpencer on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 4310 IH

1 SEC. 2. INTERACTIONS ON AND POSTING OF MATERIAL TO 

2 THE INTERNET CHECKED PRIOR TO 

3 ISSUANCE OF VISA. 

4 Chapter 2 of title I of the Immigration and Nation5 ality Act (8 U.S.C. 1151 et seq.) is amended by adding 

6 after section 219 the following: 

7 ‘‘SEC. 220. INTERACTIONS ON AND POSTING OF MATERIAL 

8 TO THE INTERNET CHECKED PRIOR TO 

9 ISSUANCE OF VISA. 

10 ‘‘Prior to the issuance of an immigrant or non11 immigrant visa to any alien, the Secretary of Homeland 

12 Security, in consultation with the Secretary of State, shall 

13 check the alien’s interactions on and posting of material 

14 to the Internet (including social media services) in order 

15 to ensure that the alien is not a threat to the security 

16 of the United States.’’. 

17 SEC. 3. GAO REPORT. 

18 On the date that is 3 years after the date of the en19 actment of this Act, the Comptroller General of the United 

20 States shall submit to Congress a report which includes— 

21 (1) a description of the implementation of the 

22 requirement under section 220 of the Immigration 

23 and Nationality Act, as added by this Act; and 

24 (2) an assessment of whether the implementa25 tion of such requirement has prevented the issuance 

26 of a visa to any alien who— 


SSpencer on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
3 

•HR 4310 IH

1 (A) is not a threat to the national security 

2 of the United States; or 

3 (B) is a threat to the national security of 

4 the United States. 

Æ 


SSpencer on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
Exhibit 32.1

         Certification Pursuant to Section 906 (18 U.S.C. Section 1350)
                        of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Warrantech Corporation (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2006 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission (the "Report"), the undersigned Officer
hereby certify, pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that
to his knowledge:

     1.   This Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and
     2.   The information contained in this Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
          of the Company.


     Date: August 11, 2006                 /s/ JOEL SAN ANTONIO
                                           -------------------------------------
                                           Joel San Antonio
                                           Chairman, Chief Executive Officer and
                                           Director

     Date: August 11, 2006                 /s/ RICHARD GAVINO
                                           -------------------------------------
                                           Richard Gavino
                                           Executive Vice President, Chief
                                           Financial Officer, Chief Accounting
                                           Officer, and Treasurer

                                       26
§ 402.145 Responding to your request. ( a ) *Retrieving records.* We are required to furnish copies of records only when they are in our possession or we can retrieve them from storage. We will make reasonable efforts to search for records manually or by automated means, including any information stored in an electronic form or format, except when such efforts would significantly interfere with the operation of our automated information system. If we have stored the records you want in the National Archives or another storage center, we will retrieve and review them for possible disclosure. However, the Federal Government destroys many old records, so sometimes it is impossible to fill requests. Various laws, regulations, and manuals give the time periods for keeping records before they may be destroyed. For example, there is information about retention of records in the Records Disposal Act of 1944, 44 U.S.C. 3301 through 3314; the Federal Property Management Regulations, 41 CFR 101-11.4; and the General Records Schedules of the National Archives and Records Administration.
( b ) *Furnishing records.* We will furnish copies only of records that we have or can retrieve. We are not required to create new records or to perform research for you. We may decide to conserve Government resources and at the same time supply the records you need by consolidating information from various records rather than copying them all. For instance, we could extract sections from various similar records instead of providing repetitious information. We generally will furnish only one copy of a record. We will make reasonable efforts to provide the records in the form or format you request if the record is readily reproducible in that form or format.
( c ) *Deletions.* When we publish or otherwise make available any record, we may delete information that is exempt from disclosure. For example, in an opinion or order, statement of policy, or other record which relates to a private party or parties, the name or names and other identifying details may be deleted. When technically feasible, we will indicate the extent of deletions on the portion of the record that is released or published at the place of the deletion unless including that indication would harm an interest protected by an exemption. If we deny a request, in whole or in part, we will make a reasonable effort to estimate the volume of any requested matter that is not disclosed, unless such an estimate would harm an interest protected by an exemption.
( d ) *Creation of records.* We are not required to create new records merely to satisfy a request. However, we will search manually or by automated means to locate information that is responsive to the request. If extensive computer programming is needed to respond to a request, we may decline to commit such resources, or if we agree to do so, we may charge you for the reasonable cost of doing so. We do not mean that we will never help you get information that does not already exist in our records. However, diverting staff and equipment from our other responsibilities may not always be possible.
[63 FR 35133, June 29, 1998]
§ 259.3 Reconsideration of initial determinations with respect to employer or employee status. ( a ) A party to an initial decision issued under § 259.1 shall have the right to request reconsideration of that decision. A request for reconsideration shall be in writing and must be filed with the Secretary to the Board within one year following the date on which the initial determination was issued. Where a request for reconsideration has been timely filed, the Secretary to the Board shall notify all other parties to the initial determination of such request. The party who requested reconsideration and any other party shall have the right to submit briefs or written argument, as well as any documentary evidence pertinent to the issue under consideration. The General Counsel or his or her designee shall review the material furnished all parties and shall submit it to the Board with a recommendation as to the determination upon reconsideration. The Board shall then issue a determination with respect to the request for reconsideration. The Secretary to the Board shall promptly notify all parties and other interested persons or entities of the determination upon reconsideration.
( b ) A party who claims to be aggrieved by an initial decision of the Board but who fails to timely request reconsideration under this section shall forfeit any further right to appeal under this part.
[57 FR 4366, Feb. 5, 1992]
#### In the Matter of the Claim of Michael Joy, Respondent, against Harris Structural Steel Co., Inc., Appellant, and World Wrecking Company et al., Respondents. State Industrial Board, Respondent.

*805All concur.
M U R R A Y  H I D A R Y



Scot Melland
CEO
Dice
3 Park Avenue, 33rd Floor
New York, NY 10016

Dear Scot:

           As of today, I am resigning from the board of Dice, Inc.



                                               Sincerely,

                                               /s/ Murray Hindary
                                               --------------------------
                                               Murray Hindary















               195 HUDSON STREET APT 13D NEW YORK, NEW YORK 10013

                      PHONE: 212 334 8773 FAX: 212 658 9610