alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
|   | 1. |   | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and                    |
|--------|----|--------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   | 2. |   | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. |

|                      | India Globalization Capital, Inc. |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                       |
|---------------------------|-----------------------------------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|                      |                              |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                       |   |
| Date: July 14, 2010  | By:                               | /s/Ram Mukunda                                                   |   |
|                      |                              | Ram Mukunda                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                |   |
|                      |                              | Chief Executive Officer and President (Principal Executive Officer)                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                        |   |
#### § 404.1624 Medical and other purchased services.

The State will determine the rates of payment for purchasing medical or other services necessary to make determinations of disability. The rates may not exceed the highest rate paid by Federal or other agencies in the State for the same or similar type of service. The State will maintain documentation to support the rates of payment it uses.

[46 FR 29204, May 29, 1981,as amended at 71 FR 16445, Mar. 31, 2006; 76 FR 24808, May 3, 2011]
NOTICE: NOT FOR OFFICIAL PUBLICATION.

UNDER ARIZONA RULE OF THE SUPREME COURT 111(c), THIS DECISION IS NOT PRECEDENTIAL

AND MAY BE CITED ONLY AS AUTHORIZED BY RULE.

IN THE

ARIZONA COURT OF APPEALS

DIVISION ONE

STATE OF ARIZONA, Respondent,

v.

HILDEFONSO ARCINEIGA-RANGEL, Petitioner.

No. 1 CA-CR 23-0227 PRPC

Petition for Review from the Superior Court in Maricopa County

No. CR2004-019648-001 DT

The Honorable David W. Garbarino, Judge

REVIEW GRANTED; RELIEF DENIED

APPEARANCES

Maricopa County Attorney’s Office, Phoenix

By Philip D. Garrow

Counsel for Respondent

Hildefonso Arcineiga-Rangel, Buckeye

Petitioner

FILED 1-25-2024
STATE v. ARCINEIGA-RANGEL

Decision of the Court

2

MEMORANDUM DECISION

Presiding Judge Michael J. Brown, Judge Andrew M. Jacobs, and Judge 

Angela K. Paton delivered the decision of the Court.

PER CURIAM:

¶1 Petitioner Hildefonso Arcineiga-Rangel seeks review of the 

superior court’s order denying his petition for post-conviction relief. This 

is his third petition. 

¶2 Absent an abuse of discretion or error of law, this court will 

not disturb a superior court’s ruling on a petition for post-conviction relief. 

State v. Gutierrez, 229 Ariz. 573, 577, ¶ 19, 278 P.3d 1276, 1280 (2012). It is 

petitioner’s burden to show that the superior court abused its discretion by 

denying the petition for post-conviction relief. See State v. Poblete, 227 Ariz. 

537, ¶ 1, P.3d 1102, 1103 (App. 2011) (petitioner has burden of establishing 

abuse of discretion on review).

¶3 We have reviewed the record in this matter, the superior 

court’s order denying the petition for post-conviction relief, and the petition 

for review. We find that petitioner has not established an abuse of 

discretion. 

¶4 We grant review and deny relief.
Exhibit
32.1






CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO SECTION 1350 OF CHAPTER 63


OF TITLE
18 OF THE UNITED STATES CODE




I, Uwe Eberle, the President and
principal executive officer of Man Investments (USA) Corp., the Managing Member
of Man-AHL 130, LLC (“Man-AHL 130”), certify that (i) the Annual Report of
Man-AHL 130 on Form 10-K for the year ending March 31, 2008 fully complies with
the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934 and (ii) the information contained in such Annual Report fairly presents,
in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
Man-AHL 130.




Date:  June 30,
2008


/s/ Uwe
Eberle


Uwe
Eberle


President
**Exhibit 23.1**

 

**Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm**

 

Wehereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statementon Form S-8 (File No. 333-111578) of Bio-Reference Laboratories, Inc. and itssubsidiaries (the “Company”) of our report dated January 12, 2010, relating tothe Company’s consolidated financial statements and the effectiveness of theCompany’s internal control over financial reporting, which appears in thisAnnual Report on form 10-K.

 

 
|   | **MSPC**                                   |
|--------|--------------------------------------------|
|   | Certified Public Accountants and Advisors, |
|   | A Professional Corporation                 |

 

 

Cranford,New Jersey

January12, 2010

 

----
#### Tony R. WHITTAKER, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. BROOKS PROTECTIVE SERVICES, INC.; et al., Defendants—Appellees.

No. 04-56860.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted Feb. 13, 2006.*

Decided Feb. 21, 2006.

Tony R. Whittaker, Tucumcari, NM, pro se.

John E. Nordin, II, Esq., Leon W. Weidman, Esq., Office of the U.S. Attorney, Civil & Tax Divisions, Julie A. Bach-man, Esq., Office of the California Attorney General, Amy Jo Field, Esq., Rockard J. Delgadillo, Esq., Los Angeles City Attorney’s Office, Los Angeles, CA, for Defendants-Appellees.

Before: FERNANDEZ, RYMER, and BYBEE, Circuit Judges.

*

 The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. *See*Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

MEMORANDUM ****

Tony R. Whittaker appeals pro se from the district court’s order dismissing his civil rights action as frivolous and designating him a vexatious litigant. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review for abuse of discretion, *McHenry v. Renne,*84 F.3d 1172, 1177 (9th Cir.1996), and we affirm.

The district court did not err in dismissing Whittaker’s action as frivolous because his Second Amended Complaint, like its predecessors, did not contain the “short and plain” statement of the claims for relief that is required by Fed.R.Civ.P. 8. *See McHenry,*84 F.3d at 1177-78; *see also Neitzke v. Williams,*490 U.S. 319, 325, 109 S.Ct. 1827, 104 L.Ed.2d 338 (1989) (“ ‘[F]rivolous,’ when applied to a complaint, embraces not only the inarguable legal conclusion, but also the fanciful factual allegation.”).

The district court did not abuse its discretion in issuing a vexatious litigant order. Whittaker was given notice and opportunity to oppose the pre-filing order, the district court specified Whittaker’s history of frivolous and burdensome filings, and its order was narrowly tailored to remedy Whittaker’s particular abuses. *See De Long v. Hennessey,*912 F.2d 1144, 1147-49 (9th Cir.1990).

AFFIRMED

**

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
Editorial Note on Part 416
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 416 appear at 68 FR 53509, Sept. 11, 2003.

§ 416.1021 Personnel. ( a ) *Equal Employment Opportunity.* The State will comply with all applicable Federal statutes, executive orders and regulations concerned with equal employment opportunities.
( b ) *Selection, tenure, and compensation.* The State agency will, except as may be inconsistent with paragraph (a) of this section, adhere to applicable State approved personnel standards in the selection, tenure, and compensation of any individual employed in the disability program.
( c ) *Travel.* The State will make personnel available to attend meetings or workshops as may be sponsored or approved by us for furthering the purposes of the disability program.
( d ) *Restrictions.* Subject to appropriate Federal funding, the State will, to the best of its ability, facilitate the processing of disability claims by avoiding personnel freezes, restrictions against overtime work, or curtailment of facilities or activities.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>

                              EXHIBIT 27


          Petroleum Heat and Power Co., Inc. and Subsidiaries


 This schedule contains summary financial information (in thousands except
per share data) extracted from Petroleum Heat and Power Co., Inc. and
Subsidiaries financial statements as of September 30, 1995 and is qualified
in its entirety by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER>1,000
       
<S>                             <C>                             
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS                           
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1995
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1995
<CASH>                                          16,240
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   53,697
<ALLOWANCES>                                     2,701
<INVENTORY>                                     22,720
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               101,939
<PP&E>                                         171,006
<DEPRECIATION>                                  42,780
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 375,091
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           94,198
<BONDS>                                        362,452
<COMMON>                                         2,547
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                           12,500
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<OTHER-SE>                                    (107,582)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   375,091
<SALES>                                        377,303
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               404,917
<CGS>                                          204,030
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  256,342
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               145,224
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   928
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              30,434
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (28,011)
<INCOME-TAX>                                       300
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (28,311)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0                                       
<CHANGES>                                       (1,436)
<NET-INCOME>                                   (29,747)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (1.31)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (1.31)
        



</TABLE>
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Defense

###### Department of the Army

# AGENCY:

Department of the Army, DoD.

# ACTION:

Notice.

# SUMMARY:

Announcement is made of the availability for licensing of the invention set forth in U.S. Provisional Patent Application Serial No. 61/458,797, entitled “Urinary Field Sampling Kit for the Determination of Nerve Agent Exposure and Method of Use Thereof,” filed on November 15, 2010. The United States Government, as represented by the Secretary of the Army, has rights to this invention.

# ADDRESSES:

Commander, U.S. Army Medical Research and Materiel Command, ATTN: Command Judge Advocate, MCMR-JA, 504 Scott Street, Fort Detrick, Frederick, MD 21702-5012.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

For patent issues, Ms. Elizabeth Arwine, Patent Attorney, (301) 619-7808. For licensing issues, Dr. Paul Mele, Office of Research and Technology Applications (ORTA), (301) 619-6664, both at telefax (301) 619-5034.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

The invention relates to a urinary field sampling kit and method of its use for collecting and processing urine samples to be analyzed to confirm, identify and measure human exposure to nerve agents.

Brenda S. Bowen,

Army Federal Register Liaison Officer.

[FR Doc. 2011-959 Filed 1-18-11; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 3710-08-P
OMI CORPORATION ANNOUNCES BANK REFINANCING AND
             PROMOTION OF KATHLEEN HAINES TO CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER



                                                   Contact:    Fredric S. London
                                                               OMI Corporation
                                                               (203) 602-6789


STAMFORD, CONNECTICUT,  September 5, 2000 - OMI Corporation (NYSE:OMM) announced
today that it has  accepted  an offer  from a group of banks led by  Christiania
Bank og Kreditkasse to refinance the Company's  existing bank  indebtedness  and
finance the two newbuildings scheduled for delivery in September and November of
this year. Closing is expected in early October.

The  total  financing  is  for  $310,000,000  and  is  for  a  five  year  term.
Amortization  will  be  $40,000,000  per  year  for  the  first  two  years  and
$25,000,000 for each following year.

Craig H. Stevenson,  Jr., Chairman, Chief Executive Officer and President of the
Company commented "We are pleased that the Company's performance has improved so
as to allow it to refinance its debt upon substantially  improved terms.  Unlike
its existing credit facilities,  the refinancing will not require disposition of
assets. The Company's ability to do future transactions will be greatly enhanced
by this refinancing."

The Company  further  announced  that  Kathleen C. Haines,  Vice  President  and
Controller has been named Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer of the Company.

Mr.  Stevenson  commented  "The Company is pleased that Kathy has  performed the
additional  responsibilities she has assumed to both our hopes and expectations.
We believe she will be an outstanding Chief Financial Officer."

A number of shareholders  have requested that the Company  reinstate  conference
calls,  which the Company  ceased  having when it gave  detailed  results in its
quarterly earnings press releases.  The Company will have a conference call when
its third quarter results are released.

OMI Corporation is a major  international  tanker owner and operator.  Its fleet
currently comprises 20 vessels, consisting of five wholly-owned Suezmax tankers,
three chartered-in Suezmaxes, eight handysize product carriers, three 66,000 dwt
product carriers which carry crude oil and one ultra large crude tanker. Two new
47,000 dwt product  carriers  are  scheduled  to be  delivered to the Company in
2000.
§ 603.23 What information must State UC agencies obtain from other agencies, and crossmatch with wage information, for purposes of an IEVS? ( a ) *Crossmatch with information from requesting agencies.* Each State UC agency must obtain such information from the Social Security Administration and any requesting agency as may be needed in verifying eligibility for, and the amount of, compensation payable under the State UC law.
( b ) *Crossmatch of wage and benefit information.* The State UC agency must crossmatch quarterly wage information with UC payment information to the extent that such information is likely, as determined by the Secretary of Labor, to be productive in identifying ineligibility for benefits and preventing or discovering incorrect payments.
Editorial Note on Part 416
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 416 appear at 68 FR 53509, Sept. 11, 2003.

§ 416.1015 Making disability determinations. ( a ) When making a disability determination, the State agency will apply subpart I, part 416, of our regulations.
( b ) The State agency will make disability determinations based only on the medical and nonmedical evidence in its files.
( c ) Disability determinations will be made by: ( 1 ) A State agency medical or psychological consultant and a State agency disability examiner;
( 2 ) A State agency disability examiner alone when there is no medical evidence to be evaluated (*i.e.*, no medical evidence exists or we are unable, despite making every reasonable effort, to obtain any medical evidence that may exist) and the individual fails or refuses, without a good reason, to attend a consultative examination (see § 416.918);
( 3 ) A State agency disability examiner alone if you are not a child (a person who has not attained age 18), and the claim is adjudicated under the quick disability determination process (see § 416.1019) or the compassionate allowance process (see § 416.1002), and the initial or reconsidered determination is fully favorable to you. This paragraph (c)(3) will no longer be effective on December 28, 2018 unless we terminate it earlier by publication of a final rule in the Federal Register; or
( 4 ) A State agency disability hearing officer. See § 416.1016 for the definition of medical or psychological consultant and § 416.1415 for the definition of disability hearing officer. The State agency disability examiner and disability hearing officer must be qualified to interpret and evaluate medical reports and other evidence relating to the claimant's physical or mental impairments and as necessary to determine the capacities of the claimant to perform substantial gainful activity. See § 416.972 for what we mean by substantial gainful activity.
( d ) In making a determination under title XVI with respect to the disability of a child to whom paragraph (d) of this section does not apply, we will make reasonable efforts to ensure that a qualified pediatrician or other individual who specializes in a field of medicine appropriate to the child's impairment(s) evaluates the case of the child.
( e ) The State agency will certify each determination of disability to us on forms we provide.
( f ) The State agency will furnish us with all the evidence it considered in making its determination.
( g ) The State agency will not be responsible for defending in court any determination made, or any procedure for making determinations, under these regulations.
[52 FR 23928, Sept. 9, 1987, as amended at 56 FR 11021, Mar. 14, 1991; 58 FR 47587, Sept. 9, 1993; 61 FR 11136, Mar. 19, 1996; 62 FR 38455, July 18, 1997; 65 FR 34959, June 1, 2000; 75 FR 62684, Oct. 13, 2010; 78 FR 66639, Nov. 6, 2013; 79 FR 51243, Aug. 28, 2014; 80 FR 63093, Oct. 19, 2015; 81 FR 73028, Oct. 24, 2016; 82 FR 5883, Jan. 18, 2017]
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of the Treasury

###### Internal Revenue Service

          - 26 CFR Part 301
          - [TD 9518]
          - RIN 1545-BJ52

# AGENCY:

Internal Revenue Service (IRS), Treasury.

# ACTION:

Correction to final regulations.

# SUMMARY:

                        This document describes a correction to final regulations (TD 9518) that were published in the                         **Federal Register**                         on Wednesday, March 30, 2011 (76 FR 17521) providing guidance to specified tax return preparers who prepare and file individual income tax returns using magnetic media pursuant to section 6011(e)(3) of the Internal Revenue Code.                    

# DATES:

This correction is effective on April 22, 2011, and is applicable to individual income tax returns filed after December 31, 2010.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Keith L. Brau, (202) 622-4940 (not a toll-free number).

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

## Background

The final regulations that are the subject of this correction are under section 6011 of the Internal Revenue Code.

## Need for Correction

As published, final regulations (TD 9518) contain an error that may prove to be misleading and is in need of clarification.

## Correction of Publication

Accordingly, the publication of the final regulations (TD 9518) which were the subject of FR Doc. 2011-7571 is corrected as follows:

                    On page 17528, column 2, under CFR Part Heading “PART 301—PROCEDURE AND ADMINISTRATION”, the language “                    **Par. 4**                    . The authority citation for part 301 is amended by adding an entries in numerical order to read, in part, as follows:” is corrected to read “                    **Par. 4.**                     The authority citation for part 301 is amended by adding entries in numerical order to read, in part, as follows:”.                

LaNita Van Dyke,

Chief, Publications and Regulations Branch, Legal Processing Division, Associate Chief Counsel (Procedure and Administration).

[FR Doc. 2011-9737 Filed 4-21-11; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4830-01-P