alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
I 

116TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 5627 

To amend the Agricultural Credit Act of 1978 with respect to pre-agreement 

costs of emergency watershed protection measures, and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JANUARY 16, 2020 

Mr. CURTIS (for himself and Mr. GARAMENDI) introduced the following bill; 

which was referred to the Committee on Agriculture 

A BILL 

To amend the Agricultural Credit Act of 1978 with respect 

to pre-agreement costs of emergency watershed protection measures, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Making Access To 

5 Cleanup Happen Act of 2020’’ or the ‘‘MATCH Act of 

6 2020’’. 

7 SEC. 2. EMERGENCY WATERSHED PROGRAM. 

8 Section 403 of the Agricultural Credit Act of 1978 

9 (16 U.S.C. 2203) is amended by adding at the end the 

10 following: 


pamtmann on DSKBC07HB2PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 5627 IH

1 ‘‘(c) PRE-AGREEMENT COSTS.— 

2 ‘‘(1) SPONSOR.—For purposes of this sub3 section, the term ‘sponsor’ means a State or local 

4 government, or an Indian tribe (as defined in section 

5 4 of the Indian Self-Determination and Education 

6 Assistance Act (25 U.S.C. 450b)). 

7 ‘‘(2) PRE-AGREEMENT PROJECT COSTS.—Not 

8 later than 180 days after the date of enactment of 

9 this subsection, the Secretary shall— 

10 ‘‘(A) identify a list of emergency watershed 

11 protection measures the cost of which may be 

12 incurred by a sponsor prior to entering into an 

13 agreement with the Secretary pursuant to this 

14 section; and 

15 ‘‘(B) develop a procedure, including appro16 priate deadlines, to be implemented at the State 

17 level, through which a sponsor may request, for 

18 a specified natural disaster, additional emer19 gency watershed protection measures the cost of 

20 which may be incurred by a sponsor prior to en21 tering into an agreement with the Secretary 

22 pursuant to this section. 

23 ‘‘(3) AGREEMENT CONTRIBUTION.—If the Sec24 retary and the sponsor enter into an agreement pur25 suant to this section, the Secretary shall consider 


pamtmann on DSKBC07HB2PROD with BILLS
3 

•HR 5627 IH

1 any applicable pre-agreement costs incurred by a 

2 sponsor for undertaking emergency watershed pro3 tection measures identified pursuant to paragraph 

4 (2) as meeting part of the sponsor’s contribution to5 wards the project costs. 

6 ‘‘(4) ASSUMPTION OF RISK.—Nothing in this 

7 subsection requires the Secretary to enter into an 

8 agreement with a sponsor, and a sponsor under9 taking emergency watershed protection measures 

10 prior to entering into an agreement with the Sec11 retary pursuant to this section shall assume the risk 

12 of incurring any costs of undertaking such meas13 ures.’’. 

Æ 


pamtmann on DSKBC07HB2PROD with BILLS
#### § 243.3 Payments pursuant to court decree or court-approved property settlement.

Certain annuity components are subject to division pursuant to a court decree or to a court-approved property settlement incident to any such decree, as provided in part 295 of this chapter.
#### § 418.3645 Can you request that the decision-maker be disqualified?

The person designated to conduct your hearing will not conduct the hearing if he or she is prejudiced or partial with respect to any party or has any interest in the matter pending for decision. If you object to the person who will be conducting your hearing, you must notify us at your earliest opportunity. The Commissioner or the Commissioner's designee will decide whether to appoint another person to conduct your hearing.
EXHIBIT 32
                                   ----------


                CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                       AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906
                        OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



         In connection with the Quarterly Report of Realmark Property Investors
Limited Partnership - III (the "Partnership") on Form 10-Q for the period ending
March 31, 2004 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date
hereof (the "Report"), I, Joseph M. Jayson, Individual General Partner and
Principal Financial Officer, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the
best of my knowledge:

         (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
              or 15(d) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
              material respects, the financial condition and result of the
              operations of the Partnership.


              May 17, 2004                      /s/ Joseph M. Jayson
              ------------                      ------------------------------
                  Date                          Joseph M. Jayson,
                                                Individual General Partner and
                                                Principal Financial Officer
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 15-41713

Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee

v.

ROY WILLIAM STOJENTIN,

Defendant-Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Texas

USDC No. 1:15-CR-631-1

Before JONES, CLEMENT, and OWEN, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Appealing the judgment in a criminal case, Roy William Stojentin raises 

an argument that is foreclosed by United States v. Betancourt, 586 F.3d 303, 

308-09 (5th Cir. 2009), which held that knowledge of drug type and quantity is 

not an element of a 21 U.S.C. § 841 offense. Accordingly, the motion for 

summary disposition is GRANTED, and the judgment of the district court is 

AFFIRMED.

 

* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not 

be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH 

CIR. R. 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

June 21, 2016

Lyle W. Cayce

Clerk

 Case: 15-41713 Document: 00513557867 Page: 1 Date Filed: 06/21/2016
### §856. Maintaining drug-involved premises

#### (a) Unlawful acts

Except as authorized by this subchapter, it shall be unlawful to—

(1) knowingly open, lease, rent, use, or maintain any place, whether permanently or temporarily, for the purpose of manufacturing, distributing, or using any controlled substance;

(2) manage or control any place, whether permanently or temporarily, either as an owner, lessee, agent, employee, occupant, or mortgagee, and knowingly and intentionally rent, lease, profit from, or make available for use, with or without compensation, the place for the purpose of unlawfully manufacturing, storing, distributing, or using a controlled substance.

#### (b) Criminal penalties

Any person who violates subsection (a) of this section shall be sentenced to a term of imprisonment of not more than 20 years or a fine of not more than $500,000, or both, or a fine of $2,000,000 for a person other than an individual.

#### (c) Violation as offense against property

A violation of subsection (a) shall be considered an offense against property for purposes of section 3663A(c)(1)(A)(ii) of title 18.

#### (d) Civil penalties

(1) Any person who violates subsection (a) shall be subject to a civil penalty of not more than the greater of—

(A) $250,000; or

(B) 2 times the gross receipts, either known or estimated, that were derived from each violation that is attributable to the person.

(2) If a civil penalty is calculated under paragraph (1)(B), and there is more than 1 defendant, the court may apportion the penalty between multiple violators, but each violator shall be jointly and severally liable for the civil penalty under this subsection.

#### (e) Declaratory and injunctive remedies

Any person who violates subsection (a) shall be subject to declaratory and injunctive remedies as set forth in section 843(f) of this title.

(Pub. L. 91–513, title II, §416, as added Pub. L. 99–570, title I, §1841(a), Oct. 27, 1986, 100 Stat. 3207–52; amended Pub. L. 106–310, div. B, title XXXVI, §3613(e), Oct. 17, 2000, 114 Stat. 1230; Pub. L. 108–21, title VI, §608(b)(1), (2), (c), Apr. 30, 2003, 117 Stat. 691.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

2003—Pub. L. 108–21, §608(b)(2), substituted "Maintaining drug-involved premises" for "Establishment of manufacturing operations" in section catchline.

Subsec. (a)(1). Pub. L. 108–21, §608(b)(1)(A), substituted "open, lease, rent, use, or maintain any place, whether permanently or temporarily," for "open or maintain any place".

Subsec. (a)(2). Pub. L. 108–21, §608(b)(1)(B), added par. (2) and struck out former par. (2) which read as follows: "manage or control any building, room, or enclosure, either as an owner, lessee, agent, employee, or mortgagee, and knowingly and intentionally rent, lease, or make available for use, with or without compensation, the building, room, or enclosure for the purpose of unlawfully manufacturing, storing, distributing, or using a controlled substance."

Subsecs. (d), (e). Pub. L. 108–21, §608(c), added subsecs. (d) and (e).

2000—Subsec. (c). Pub. L. 106–310 added subsec. (c).
#### § 411.560 Is it possible to pay a milestone or outcome payment to more than one EN?

It is possible for more than one EN (including a State VR agency acting as an EN) to receive payment based on the same milestone or outcome. If the beneficiary has assigned the ticket to more than one EN (or State VR agency acting as an EN) at different times, and more than one EN (or State VR agency) requests payment for the same milestone, outcome or reconciliation payment under its elected payment system, the PM will make a determination of the allocation of payment to each EN (or State VR agency acting as an EN). The PM will make this determination based upon the contribution of the services provided by each EN (or State VR agency acting as an EN) toward the achievement of the outcomes or milestones. Outcome and milestone payments will not be increased because the payments are shared between two or more ENs (including a State VR agency acting as an EN).

[73 FR 29350, May 20, 2008]
Chapter 4. Consultation and Coordination 

This EIS was prepared by the following Forest Service staff. 

Interdisciplinary Team Members 

Duane Bennett Zone Lands and Special Uses Specialist 

Robert Lefevre Coronado NF Watershed and Forestry Program Manager 

Anne Casey Safford Ranger District Wildlife Biologist 

Debby Kriegel Coronado NF Landscape Architect 

Andrea Campbell Coronado NF NEPA Compliance Officer 

Larry Jones Coronado NF Assistant Wildlife Program Manager 

Sarah Davis Coronado NF Public Affairs Office 

Pete Schwab Coronado NF Fire and Aviation Officer 

Mary Anna Wheat Recreation Specialist 

Celeste Gordon Recreation and Special Uses Program Manager 

Mary Farrell Coronado NF Archeologist/Heritage Program Manager 

MiMi Battin Geographic Information System Mapping 

Forest Service Enterprise Team: Recreation Solutions 

Joni Akin ID Team, Administrative Support 

Tracy Anderson Interdisciplinary Team Leader 

David DelSordo Writer/Editor 

Miles Friend Writer/Editor 

The Forest Service consulted the many individuals, Federal, State, and local agencies, tribes and 

non-Forest Service persons during development of this EIS (project record, item 9). Among them 

were the following agencies and tribes. 

Federal, State, and Local Agencies 

U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service 

Advisory Council on Historic Preservation 

Arizona Department of Economic Security 

Arizona Department of Environmental Quality 

Arizona Department of Water Resources 

Arizona Game and Fish Department 

Arizona State Historic Preservation Office 

University of Arizona 

Graham County Assessor 

Graham County Treasurer 

DEIS for New Special-Use Permits for Recreation Residences, Safford Ranger District 145 
Chapter 4. Consultation and Coordination 

Tribes 

Ak-Chin Indian Community 

Ft. Sill Apache Tribe 

Gila River Indian Community 

Hopi Cultural Preservation Office 

Mescalero Apache Tribe 

Pascua Yaqui Tribe 

Pueblo of Zuni 

Salt River Pima-Maricopa Indian Community 

San Carlos Apache Tribe 

Tohono O’odham Nation 

White Mountain Apache Tribe 

Yavapai-Apache Nation 

146 DEIS for New Special-Use Permits for Recreation Residences, Safford Ranger District 
DEIS for New Special-Use Permits for Recreation Residences, Safford Ranger District 147
```

[Congressional Bills 114th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 4118 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

114th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 4118

 To authorize the Secretary of Veterans Affairs to provide support to 
   university law school programs that are designed to provide legal 
            assistance to veterans, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           November 19, 2015

  Ms. Norton introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                     Committee on Veterans' Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To authorize the Secretary of Veterans Affairs to provide support to 
   university law school programs that are designed to provide legal 
            assistance to veterans, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Veterans Legal Support Act of 
2015''.

SEC. 2. DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS SUPPORT FOR UNIVERSITY LEGAL 
              CLINICS THAT ASSIST VETERANS.

    (a) Support Authorized.--The Secretary of Veterans Affairs may 
provide support to one or more university law school programs that are 
designed to provide legal assistance to veterans.
    (b) Eligible Programs.--Programs of university law schools which 
may receive support under subsection (a) may include programs that 
assist veterans with--
            (1) filing and appealing claims for benefits under laws 
        administered by the Secretary; and
            (2) such other civil, criminal, and family legal matters as 
        the Secretary considers appropriate.
    (c) Financial Support.--
            (1) In general.--The support provided a program under 
        subsection (a) may include financial support of the program.
            (2) Limitation on amount.--The total amount of financial 
        support provided under subsection (a) in any fiscal year may 
        not exceed $1,000,000.
            (3) Funding.--Amounts for financial support under 
        subsection (a) shall be derived from amounts appropriated or 
        otherwise made available to the Medical Services account of the 
        Department of Veterans Affairs.
                                 <all>
```
#### § 404.723 When evidence of marriage is required.

If you apply for benefits as the insured person's husband or wife, widow or widower, divorced wife or divorced husband, we will ask for evidence of the marriage and where and when it took place. We may also ask for this evidence if you apply for child's benefits or for the lump-sum death payment as the widow or widower. If you are a widow, widower, or divorced wife who remarried after your marriage to the insured person ended, we may also ask for evidence of the remarriage. You may be asked for evidence of someone else's marriage if this is necessary to prove your marriage to the insured person was valid. In deciding whether the marriage to the insured person is valid or not, we will follow the law of the State where the insured person had his or her permanent home when you applied or, if earlier, when he or she died—see § 404.770. What evidence we will ask for depends upon whether the insured person's marriage was a ceremonial marriage, a common-law marriage, or a marriage we will deem to be valid.

[43 FR 24795, June 7, 1978, as amended at 44 FR 34493, June 15, 1979]
CENTRAL VALLEY OPERATIONS OFFICE

CHINOOK SALMON REPORT

April 2007

Note: Bold numbers are not verified by DFG

Winter Run Chinook Salmon Estimated Loss (Incidental Take) Spring Run Chinook Salmon Estimated Loss (Incidental Take) 

Daily SWP Daily CVP Daily Combined Season Combined Daily SWP Daily CVP Daily Combined Season Combined Daily 

Tagged* No Tag Tagged* No Tag Tagged* No Tag Tagged* No Tag Tagged No Tag Tagged No Tag Tagged No Tag Tagged No Tag In C

DATE Estimated Estimated Estimated Estimated Estimated Estimated Estimated Estimated Estimated Estimated Estimated Estimated Estimated Estimated Estimated Estimated

Loss Loss Loss Loss Loss Loss Loss Loss Loss Loss Loss Loss Loss Loss Loss Loss

1-Apr-07 0 18 0 0 0 18 33 3,016 0 58 0 8 0 66 15 248 3,306 

2-Apr-07 0 36 0 0 0 36 33 3,052 0 42 0 0 0 42 15 290 2,954 3-Apr-07 0 27 0 26 0 53 33 3,105 0 52 0 47 0 99 15 389 2,272 4-Apr-07 0 61 0 9 0 70 33 3,175 0 175 0 23 0 198 15 587 2,545 5-Apr-07 0 18 0 17 0 35 33 3,210 0 136 0 30 0 166 15 753 4,058 6-Apr-07 0000 0 0 33 3,210 0 58 0 31 0 89 15 842 2,909 7-Apr-07 0000 0 0 33 3,210 8 92 0 30 8 122 23 964 2,446 8-Apr-07 0000 0 0 33 3,210 0 74 0 61 0 135 23 1,099 2,423 9-Apr-07 0000 0 0 33 3,210 0 84 0 102 0 186 23 1,285 2,159 

10-Apr-07 0000 0 0 33 3,210 0 17 0 69 0 86 23 1,371 1,330 11-Apr-07 0009 0 9 33 3,219 0 0 0 61 0 61 23 1,432 2,288 12-Apr-07 0900 0 9 33 3,228 14 22 0 101 14 123 37 1,555 2,178 13-Apr-07 0000 0 0 33 3,228 0 0 0 137 0 137 37 1,692 2,393 14-Apr-07 0009 0 9 33 3,237 0 17 0 138 0 155 37 1,847 2,480 15-Apr-07 0000 0 0 33 3,237 0 43 0 100 0 143 37 1,990 2,409 

16-Apr-07 0000 0 0 33 3,237 8 346 0 91 8 437 45 2,427 3,390 17-Apr-07 0000 0 0 33 3,237 0 419 0 184 0 603 45 3,030 2,704 18-Apr-07 0 17 0 9 0 26 33 3,263 0 456 0 108 0 564 45 3,594 2,398 19-Apr-07 0000 0 0 33 3,263 0 342 0 61 0 403 45 3,997 2,431 20-Apr-07 0 0 0 10 0 10 33 3,273 0 178 0 47 0 225 45 4,222 2,669 21-Apr-07 0 17 0 0 0 17 33 3,290 0 225 0 66 0 291 45 4,513 2,992 22-Apr-07 0 0 0 12 0 12 33 3,302 0 87 0 29 0 116 45 4,629 640 23-Apr-07 0000 0 0 33 3,302 0000 0 0 45 4,629 660 

24-Apr-07 0000 0 0 33 3,302 0 22 0 0 0 22 45 4,651 445 25-Apr-07 0000 0 0 33 3,302 0000 0 0 45 4,651 1,037 

26-Apr-07 0000 0 0 33 3,302 0 27 0 0 0 27 45 4,678 669 

27-Apr-07 0000 0 0 33 3,302 0 69 0 10 0 79 45 4,757 676 

28-Apr-07 0000 0 0 33 3,302 0 26 0 0 0 26 45 4,783 674 

29-Apr-07 0000 0 0 33 3,302 0 17 0 0 0 17 45 4,800 672 

30-Apr-07 0000 0 0 33 3,302 0 52 0 0 0 52 45 4,852 727 

Total 0 203 0 101 0 304 33 3,302 30 3136 0 1534 30 4,670 45 4,852 60,935 8

Winter Run Incidental Take Levels (Oct 1 thru May 31) Spring Run Incidental Take Levels for Season Combined Total (Oct 1 thru Jun 30)Tagged Yellow Light Level = ??? SeasonTagged Red Light Level = ??? SeasonNo Tag Yellow Light Level = ??? SeasonNo Tag Red Light Level = ??? Season* This number is determined by Winter Run Length only until the tags have been read. All tags from Winter Run Length Fish have been read and numbers are updated thru

Banks Tr
114TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 4284 

AN ACT 

To require the Administrator of the Small Business Administration to issue regulations providing examples of a failure to comply in good faith with the requirements of 

prime contractors with respect to subcontracting plans. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 
2 

•HR 4284 EH

1 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

2 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Service Provider Op3 portunity Clarification Act of 2015’’. 

4 SEC. 2. GOOD FAITH COMPLIANCE WITH THE REQUIRE5 MENTS OF PRIME CONTRACTORS WITH RE6 SPECT TO SUBCONTRACTING PLANS. 

7 Not later than 270 days after the date of enactment 

8 of this Act, the Administrator of the Small Business Ad9 ministration shall issue regulations providing examples of 

10 activities that would be considered a failure to make a 

11 good faith effort to comply with the requirements imposed 

12 on an entity (other than a small business concern as de13 fined under section 3 of the Small Business Act (15 

14 U.S.C. 632)) that is awarded a prime contract containing 

15 the clauses required under paragraphs (4) or (5) of section 

16 8(d) of the Small Business Act (15 U.S.C. 637(d)). 

Passed the House of Representatives April 19, 2016. 

Attest: 

Clerk. 

114TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 4284 

AN ACT 

To require the Administrator of the Small Business 

spect to subcontracting plans. the requirements of prime contractors with reamples of a failure to comply in good faith with Administration to issue regulations providing ex-
HILLS BANCORPORATION
                                   EXHIBIT 11
                    COMPUTATION OF EARNINGS PER COMMON SHARE


                                                         Three Months Ended
                                                              March 31
                                                    ----------------------------
                                                       1997              1996
                                                    -----------      -----------


Shares of common stock, beginning .............       1,465,384        1,463,604

    Shares redeemed during this period ........            (180)           - - -
                                                    -----------      -----------
Shares of common stock, ending ................       1,465,204        1,463,604
                                                    ===========      ===========

Weighted average number of shares outstanding #       1,479,172        1,473,069
                                                    ===========      ===========

Earnings and Earnings per share:
    Net income (in thousands) .................     $     1,611      $     1,426
                                                    ===========      ===========

    Earnings per common share .................     $      1.09      $       .97
                                                    ===========      ===========


#    Computation of weighted average number of shares include  equivalent shares
     attributable to stock options granted in 1993,  computed under the treasury
     stock method.