alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Regulatory Evaluation

Docket No. FAA-2016-5044 Directorate Identifier: 2014-NM-166-AD

If you make changes to the values in the table below, you must ensure the totals update accordingly. If 

they do not, click (or Tab) into and then out of the changed cell.

Estimated Costs:

Action

(e.g., Inspection, 

replacement)

Do not include oncondition costs here

Costs per Product (e.g., aircraft, engine, 

propeller, appliance)

Work-hours

(include 

access, testing, 

and close-up)

Labor 

cost 

(@$85/h

our)

Parts Cost Total Costs 

(labor + 

parts)

Number of 

U.S. 

Registered 

Products

Total Cost 

for U.S. Fleet

Inspection 1.5 $ 127.50 $0 $ 127.50 75 $9,562.50

Rectification 0.5 $ 42.50 $551 $ 593.50 75 $44,512.50

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

The known number of products in compliance:

Total Costs of compliance for U.S. fleet: $54,075

Costs covered under warranty (if known) $

On-Condition Costs:

Action

(e.g., Inspection, 

replacement)

Work-hours 

(include access, 

testing, and closeup)

Labor cost 

(@$85/hour)

Parts Cost Cost per Product

$ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00

Special considerations for Economic Analysis (Use this field to explain anything in the Estimated Costs table 

that was assumed or might not be obvious. This field can also be used to explain warranty costs):
Executive Order 12866:

Could the AD be considered a “significant regulatory action”?

YES* NO 

*Explanation: 

DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedures:

Is the AD significant? 

YES* NO 

*Explanation: 

Regulatory Flexibility Act:

Will the AD have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities? Explain for 

either a Yes or No answer.

YES NO 

Explanation: 

Intrastate Aviation in Alaska:

This AD could affect intrastate aviation in Alaska. Is it appropriate to include specific requirements for 

aircraft operated in Alaska where aviation might be the only mode of transportation?

YES* NO 

*Explanation:
### §2085. Authorization of appropriations

(a) There is authorized to be appropriated not to exceed $7,500,000 to provide for United States participation in Interama under this chapter, of which not to exceed $250,000 shall be available for expenditure in connection with the preparation of the report required to be submitted to the Congress under section 2(b) of this Act. Sums appropriated under this subsection shall remain available until expended.

(b) In addition to the amount authorized in subsection (a), there is authorized to be appropriated not to exceed $1,000,000 annually for each of the fiscal years 1968 and 1969 for the maintenance of United States installations and activities at Interama.

(Pub. L. 89–355, §5, Feb. 19, 1966, 80 Stat. 7.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

Section 2(b) of this Act, referred to in subsec. (a), means section 2(b) of Pub. L. 89–355, which was set out as a note under section 2082 of this title.
[if !vml]>[endif]>

[if !vml]>[endif]>

You have reached the FederalDepository Library Program Electronic Collection (FDLP/EC) Archive. Thisarchive assures ongoing access to publications in the FDLP/EC. Access topublications in the archive is available through GPO's suite of cataloging andlocator services, including the Catalog of U.S. Government Publications(CGP).  Archived copies of publications are retrieved in the event thatpublications are no longer available from the original publishing agency site. 
**Title:****Rulemaking for Coloradoroadless areas [electronic resource].**
 
Volumes: One | Two| Three
 
SuDoc Number:A 13.92: C 71
Item Number:0080-F (online)
CGP systemNumber:000941841
 
April 20, 2018
Exhibit 23.1
                                                                    ------------




                    CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS


As independent public accountants, we hereby consent to the incorporation by
reference in this registration statement of our report dated February 5, 2002,
included in Newmont Mining Corporation's Form 10-K for the year ended December
31, 2001 and to all references to our Firm included in this registration
statement.


                                                         /s/ Arthur Andersen LLP


Denver, Colorado,
April 26, 2002.
§ 61.403 Approval of claims for legal and other services. ( a ) No claim for legal services or for any other services rendered in respect to a claim or award for compensation under the Act to or on account of any person shall be valid unless approved by the Office. Any such claim approved by the Office shall, in the manner and to the extent fixed by the Office, be paid out of the compensation payable to the claimant.
( b ) The Office shall not recognize a contract for a stipulated fee or for a fee on a contingent basis. No fee for services shall be approved except upon application supported by a sufficient statement of the extent and character of the necessary work done on behalf of the claimant. Except where the claimant was advised that the representation would be rendered on a gratuitous basis, the fee approved shall be reasonably commensurate with the actual necessary work performed by the representative, and with due regard to the capacity in which the representative appeared, the amount of compensation involved, and the circumstances of the claimant.
§ 618.530 Reductions of Reemployment Trade Adjustment Assistance payments; priority of payments. ( a ) *Ordered child support payments.* State laws regarding deductions of payments from UI, TRA, and RTAA must comply with the Social Security Act (SSA). SSA section 303(e)(1) defines child support obligations as only including obligations which are being enforced pursuant to a plan described in section 454 of SSA which has been approved by the Secretary of Health and Human Services under part D of title IV of SSA. SSA does not otherwise permit deductions for alimony or for child support.
( b ) *Priority of UI payments.* RTAA does not fit into priority of payments under UI because RTAA is related to employment, not unemployment. UI and RTAA are two separate programs that operate independently of one another.
Electrical Conductivity, UMHOS

Day High Low Mean

1 188 186 187

2 189 186 188

3 189 186 188

4 187 185 186

5 187 186 187

6 187 186 186

7 187 181 183

8 185 171 179

9 219 165 193

10 222 175 202

11 222 182 198

12 227 177 197

13 229 177 200

14 222 182 199

15 219 180 198

16 225 180 206

17 225 181 207

18 233 183 213

19 229 186 212

20 231 184 208

21 237 186 215

22 231 186 211

23 230 184 207

24 229 173 207

25 227 183 200

26 231 180 197

27 228 180 201

28 224 181 209

COMMENT(S):

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

Historical Archive and Report Database

San Andreas On The San Joaquin River 

Period: February 2023 Run Date: 11/27/2023
### §277d–17. Chamizal boundary settlement; investigations relating to river channel; acquisition of lands; relocation of facilities

In connection with the convention between the United States of America and the United Mexican States for the solution of the problem of the Chamizal, signed August 29, 1963, the Secretary of State, acting through the United States Commissioner, International Boundary and Water Commission, United States and Mexico, is authorized—

a. to conduct technical and other investigations relating to: the demarcation or monumentation of the boundary between the United States and Mexico; flood control; water resources; sanitation and prevention of pollution; channel relocation, improvement, and stabilization; and other matters related to the new river channel.

b. to acquire by donation, purchase, or condemnation, all lands required—

(1) for transfer to Mexico as provided in said convention;

(2) for construction of that portion of the new river channel and the adjoining levee in the territory of the United States;

(3) for relocation of highways, roadways, railroads, telegraph, telephone, electric transmission lines, bridges, related facilities, and any publicly owned structure or facility, the relocation of which, in the judgment of the said Commissioner, is necessitated by the project.

c. For the purpose of effecting said relocations—

(1) to perform any or all work involved in said relocations;

(2) to enter into contracts with the owners of properties to be relocated whereby they undertake to acquire any or all properties needed for said relocations, or undertake to perform any or all work involved in said relocations;

(3) to convey or exchange properties acquired or improved by the United States under sections 277d–17 to 277d–25 of this title or under said convention, with or without improvements, or to grant term or perpetual easements therein or thereover.

(Pub. L. 88–300, §1, Apr. 29, 1964, 78 Stat. 184.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section is comprised of part of section 1 of Pub. L. 88–300. Remainder of section 1 is set out as a Short Title note below.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Short Title

Pub. L. 88–300, §1, Apr. 29, 1964, 78 Stat. 184, provided in part: "That this Act [enacting this section and sections 277d–18 to 277d–25 of this title] may be cited as the 'American-Mexican Chamizal Convention Act of 1964'."
§ 429.208 How do you determine the award? Is the settlement of my claim final? ( a ) The amount allowable for damage to or loss of any item of property may not exceed the lowest of: ( 1 ) The amount you requested for the item as a result of its loss, damage, or the cost of its repair;
( 2 ) The actual or estimated cost of its repair; or
( 3 ) The actual value at the time of its loss, damage, or destruction. The actual value is determined by using the current replacement cost or the depreciated value of the item since you acquired it, whichever is lower, less any salvage value of the item in question, if you retain the item.
( b ) Depreciation in value is determined by considering the type of article involved, its cost, its condition when damaged or lost, and the time elapsed between the date you acquired it and the date of damage or loss.
( c ) Current replacement cost and depreciated value are determined by use of publicly available adjustment rates or through use of other reasonable methods at the discretion of the SSA Claims Officer.
( d ) Replacement of lost or damaged property may be made in kind wherever appropriate at the discretion of the SSA Claims Officer.
( e ) At the discretion of the SSA Claims Officer, you may be required to turn over an item alleged to have been damaged beyond economical repair to the United States, in which case no deduction for salvage value will be made in the calculation of actual value.
( f ) Settlement of claims under the Act are final and conclusive.
Editorial Note on Part 416
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 416 appear at 68 FR 53509, Sept. 11, 2003.

§ 416.974a When and how we will average your earnings. ( a ) To determine your initial eligibility for benefits, we will average any earnings you make during the month you file for benefits and any succeeding months to determine if you are doing substantial gainful activity. If your work as an employee or as a self-employed person was continuous without significant change in work patterns or earnings, and there has been no change in the substantial gainful activity earnings levels, your earnings will be averaged over the entire period of work requiring evaluation to determine if you have done substantial gainful activity.
( b ) If you work over a period of time during which the substantial gainful activity earnings levels change, we will average your earnings separately for each period in which a different substantial gainful activity earnings level applies.
( c ) If there is a significant change in your work pattern or earnings during the period of work requiring evaluation, we will average your earnings over each separate period of work to determine if any of your work efforts were substantial gainful activity.
[65 FR 42790, July 11, 2000]
### §286t. Omitted

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section, act July 31, 1945, ch. 339, §34, as added Oct. 7, 1980, Pub. L. 96–389, §4(b), 94 Stat. 1553, directed the Secretary of the Treasury, in cooperation with the United States Director of the Fund, to study and report to Congress prior to May 15, 1981, with respect to adequacy of Fund resources and method of increasing Fund liquidity, promotion of more direct recycling of oil surpluses, and methods of providing adequate resources for balance-of-payments financing.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Recycling Balance-of-Payments Surpluses by Oil Exporting Countries

Pub. L. 96–389, §4(a), Oct. 7, 1980, 94 Stat. 1553, provided that: "It is the sense of the Congress that (1) the interests of the United States and those of other member countries require an effective International Monetary Fund equipped with resources adequate to facilitate orderly balance-of-payments adjustments; (2) persistent balance-of-payments surpluses in oil exporting countries have placed, and will continue to place, severe strains on the resources of oil importing countries and on the liquidity of the Fund; (3) these strains can only be relieved if the oil exporting countries assume a greater burden for financing balance-of-payments deficits through direct methods of recycling their surpluses and through proportionally greater contributions to the Fund and to the international lending institutions; and (4) the Fund must explore innovative proposals to encourage more direct recycling of oil surpluses and to increase its own liquidity."
### §290i–8. Force and effect of agreement

Paragraph 5 of article 49, articles 50 through 59, and the other provisions of the agreement shall have full force and effect in the United States, its territories and possessions, and the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico, upon acceptance of membership by the United States in the Bank. The President, at the time of deposit of the instrument of acceptance of membership by the United States in the Bank, shall also deposit a declaration as provided in article 64, paragraph 3, of the agreement that the United States retains for itself and its political subdivisions the right to tax salaries and emoluments paid by the Bank to United States citizens or nationals.

(Pub. L. 97–35, title XIII, §1340, Aug. 13, 1981, 95 Stat. 743.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

The agreement, referred to in text, is the agreement establishing the African Development Bank. See section 290i of this title.
### §133. Repealed. May 7, 1926, ch. 250, §7, 44 Stat. 405

Section, act Feb. 17, 1911, ch. 105, 36 Stat. 917, provided for purchase of buildings for Diplomatic and Consular Service.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

DAY ELEV

 895.14

 895.22

 895.03

 894.73

 894.48

 894.18

 893.79

 893.44

 893.06

 892.70

 892.41

 892.03

 891.83

 891.39

 891.12

 890.68

 890.22

 890.07

 890.06

 890.23

 890.08

 890.22

 890.12

 890.01

 889.93

 889.67

 889.55

 889.56

 889.49

 889.66

 1,110.4

 1,111.3

 1,109.1

 1,105.6

 1,102.7

 1,099.2

 1,094.7

 1,090.7

 1,086.4

 1,082.2

 1,078.9

 1,074.6

 1,072.3

 1,067.4

 1,064.3

 1,059.4

 1,054.2

 1,052.5

 1,052.4

 1,054.3

 1,052.6

 1,054.2

 1,053.1

 1,051.8

 1,050.9

 1,048.0

 1,046.7

 1,046.8

 1,046.0

 1,047.9

STORAGE

+1.5

+0.9

-2.2

-3.5

-2.9

-3.5

-4.5

-4.0

-4.4

-4.1

-3.3

-4.3

-2.3

-5.0

-3.1

-5.0

-5.2

-1.7

-0.1

+1.9

-1.7

+1.6

-1.1

-1.2

-0.9

-2.9

-1.3

+0.1

-0.8

+1.9

CHANGE

 3,499

 2,910

 3,139

 2,858

 3,237

 3,148

 2,721

 2,749

 2,709

 2,813

 2,611

 2,634

 3,337

 2,327

 3,090

 1,815

 1,589

 3,389

 3,500

 4,478

 3,502

 4,700

 3,739

 3,231

 3,097

 2,338

 3,017

 3,862

 3,211

 4,736

INFLOW

 2,718

 2,423

 4,236

 4,576

 4,669

 4,864

 4,950

 4,736

 4,876

 4,855

 4,221

 4,796

 4,469

 4,828

 4,621

 4,289

 4,151

 4,209

 3,526

 3,499

 4,345

 3,900

 4,292

 3,838

 3,537

 3,784

 3,682

 3,803

 3,601

 3,771

POWER

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

SPILL

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

OUTLET

 17

 17

 20

 34

 27

 34

 37

 40

 34

 30

 57

 23

 10

 10

 10

 23

 43

 30

 30

 16

 7

 7

 13

 16

 10

 16

 10

 3

 3

 10

C.F.S.

 .05

 .05

 .06

 .10

 .08

 .10

 .11

 .12

 .10

 .09

 .17

 .07

 .03

 .03

 .03

 .07

 .13

 .09

 .09

 .05

 .02

 .02

 .04

 .05

 .03

 .05

 .03

 .01

 .01

 .03

INCHES

 .21

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .45

 .07

 .03

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .51

 .20

 2.18

 .04

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .85

 .45

PRECIP

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

NOVEMBER 2014 SHASTA LAKE DAILY OPERATIONS RUN DATE: January 5, 2015

IN LAKE

EVAPORATION

INCHES

C.F.S.

COMPUTED*

1000 ACRE-FEET

RELEASE - C.F.S.

RIVER

TOTALS -61.1 93,986 124,065 0 0 637 1.91 4.99

ACRE-FEET -61,100 186,421 246,083 0 0 1,263

COMMENTS:

* COMPUTED INFLOW IS THE SUM OF CHANGE IN STORAGE, RELEASES AND EVAPORATION.

SUMMARY

RELEASE (ACRE-FEET)

POWER 246,083

SPILL 0

OUTLET

TOTAL

 0

 246,083

PRECIPITATION

THIS MONTH =

TO DATE =

 4.99

JULY 1, 2014 12.97

 1,108.8

Table 3
#### NEDVED, Appellant, v. NEDVED, Respondent.

(238 N. W. 643.)

(File No. 7178.

Opinion filed October 25, 1931.)

*Lynch, Doyle & Mahoney,*of Sioux Falls, for Appellant.

*R. C. Baker,*of Lake Andes, and *Conzvay, Beyder & Conway,*of Sioux Falls, for Respondent.

CAMPBELL, J.

Defendant, Fred Nedved, is a resident of Charles Mix county, S. D. .September 15, 1929, his wife, Marguerite Nedved, the plaintiff, instituted the present action against him seeking a divorce. , Plaintiff instituted her action in Minne*162halia county, S. D. Within the statutory time defendant, in due form, demanded change of venue to the county of his residence. Plaintiff resisted that demand, and made a showing by affidavits seeking to have the case retained in Minnehaha county, S. D., on the ground of convenience of witnesses. The trial court very properly (Smail v. Gilruth, 8 S. D. 287, 66 N. W. 452; George v. Kotan, 18 S. D. 437, 101 N. W. 31; Ivanusch v. Great Northern Ry. Co., 26 S. D. 158, 128 N. W. 333) refused to consider at that time and upon that application any question of convenience of witnesses, and made and entered its order removing the case to the county of defendant’s residence. Defendant answered, and issue was joined. Thereafter, and on June 27, 1930, plaintiff petitioned the circuit court of Charles Mix county to remove the cause to Minnehaha county, S. D., where plaintiff is domiciled, upon the ground of convenience of witnesses, and made a showing in support of that application. The application was resisted by defendant, and the matter having come on for hearing, an order was duly made and entered denying the application of plaintiff, from which order plaintiff has now appealed.

 The matter of granting or refusing an application for change of venue, made upon the ground of convenience of witnessess, lies very largely within the sound judicial discretion of the court to whom it is addressed. The action of the court thereon will not be reversed upon appeal unless a clear abuse of such discretion appears. Wakpala State Bank v. Tackett, 50 S. D. 385, 210 N. W. 199; Curren v. Story, 41 N. D. 361, 170 N. W. 875.

To rehearse in this opinion the showings made by the respective parties below would prolong the opinion unduly and serve no good purpose. We have examined the record with care, and it is sufficient to say that not only has appellant failed to- convince us that the learned trial judge in any degree abused his discretion, but, on the other hand, we are affirmatively persuaded that he exercised it properly.

The order is affirmed.

POLLEY, P. J., absent and not participating.

ROBERTS, WARREN, and- RUDOLPH, JJ, concur.
Exhibit 32.1

# Certification Pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. 1350,As Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In
connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended August 31, 2004 (the
Report) of Immucor, Inc. (the Registrant), as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, I certify, to the best of my
knowledge, that:

(1)       
          The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
          Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

(2)       
          The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
          respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant.

October 8, 2004

/s/ Dr. Gioacchino De Chirico

Dr. Gioacchino De Chirico
Chief Executive Officer
### §2349aa–3. Repealed. Pub. L. 104–164, title I, §121(c), July 21, 1996, 110 Stat. 1428

Section, Pub. L. 87–195, pt. II, §574, as added Pub. L. 98–151, §101(b)(2), Nov. 14, 1983, 97 Stat. 972, directed President to transmit to Congress, not less than 30 days before providing assistance to foreign country under this part, a report which specified terms and objectives of such assistance, and required annual presentation to Congress of information on all countries that received assistance under this part for each fiscal year.