alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
### §286mm. Measures to reduce military spending by developing nations

#### (a) Development by Fund of means to measure military spending

#### (1) Position of the United States

The United States Executive Director of the Fund shall use the voice and vote of the United States to urge the Fund, in consultation with the Bank, to continue to develop an economic methodology to measure the level of military spending by each developing country.

#### (2) Progress report to the Congress

No later than 1 year after October 24, 1992, the Secretary of the Treasury shall submit to the Committee on Banking, Finance and Urban Affairs of the House of Representatives and the Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs and the Committee on Foreign Relations of the Senate a report on the status of the development by the Fund of a workable economic methodology to measure military spending by developing countries.

#### (b) Annual reports by Fund on levels of military spending

The United States Executive Director of the Fund shall use the voice and vote of the United States to urge the Fund, beginning with 1994, to provide the Executive Board of the Fund with annual reports stating the estimate by the Fund of the level of military spending by each developing country in the immediately preceding calendar year (or, with respect to developing countries whose fiscal years are not calendar years, in the most recently completed fiscal year of the developing country), not later than the date of the annual fall Interim and Development Committee meetings.

#### (c) Analysis and assessment of military spending to be included in article IV consultations by Fund

The United States Executive Director of the Fund shall use the voice and vote of the United States to urge the Fund, beginning no later than the date of the first report provided as described in subsection (b), to include in every article IV consultation with a developing country an analysis of the level of military spending by the developing country in the immediately preceding calendar year (or, with respect to developing countries whose fiscal years are not calendar years, in the most recently completed fiscal year of the developing country).

(July 31, 1945, ch. 339, §60, as added Pub. L. 102–511, title X, §1003, Oct. 24, 1992, 106 Stat. 3359.)

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Change of Name

Committee on Banking, Finance and Urban Affairs of House of Representatives treated as referring to Committee on Banking and Financial Services of House of Representatives by section 1(a) of Pub. L. 104–14, set out as a note preceding section 21 of Title 2, The Congress. Committee on Banking and Financial Services of House of Representatives abolished and replaced by Committee on Financial Services of House of Representatives, and jurisdiction over matters relating to securities and exchanges and insurance generally transferred from Committee on Energy and Commerce of House of Representatives by House Resolution No. 5, One Hundred Seventh Congress, Jan. 3, 2001.
PUBLICATIONSTransportationTransportation data range from the size of truck fleets to the cost ofpublic warehousing.  People use the data to analyze passenger andcommodity traffic; calculate fuel consumption; and locate stores, improvehighways, and the like where traffis is heaviest.  People also use thedata in determining investing in equipment and service facilities, andplanning parking and shuttle connections. Publications listed are in the Portable Document Format (PDF). In N/Ato view these files, you will need the lastest version of the Adobe(R) Acrobat(R)Reader which is available for free from the Adobe web site. 
Return to Publications
*(Note:  File size is indicated for files of 1 Mb or more)*
**1997 Economic Reports****1992 Census Reports**
**2002 Economic Census****Transportation**EC02-48ITransportation and Warehousing, Industry SeriesIndustry Series ScheduleDocumentN/AEC02TCF-US(P)Commodity Flow Survey Commodity Flow Survey, United States (Preliminary)DocumentN/AEC02TVVehicle Inventory and Use Survey - United States and StatesDocument N/A**1997 Economic Census****Transportation Reports**N/ANorth American Transportation in FiguresDocumentN/AEC97TCFCommodity Flow Survey - Regions and DivisionsDocumentN/AEC97TCFCommodity Flow Survey - United States ExportsDocumentOrderEC97TCFCommodity Flow Survey - United States and StatesDocumentOrderEC97TCFCommodity Flow Survey -Metropolitan Areas (MAs) and Remainder of State (ROS)DocumentOrderEC97TVVehicle Inventory and Use Survey - United States and StatesDocumentN/AEC97TTransportation and Warehousing, Geographic Area SeriesDocumentOrder**Utilities**EC97T22Geographic Area Series DocumentN/ASubject Series (Available at a later date)**1992 Census of Transportation, Communications, and Utilities**UC92-A-1Geographic Area Series, Summary (4 Mb)DocumentOrderUC92-N-1Nonemployer Statistics Series, SummaryDocumentOrderUC92-S-1Subject Series, Establishment and Firm Size (2 Mb)DocumentOrderUC92-S-2Subject Series, Miscellaneous Subjects (2 Mb)DocumentOrderTC92-CF1993 Commodity Flow Survey (All files over 1 Mb)DocumentOrderTC92-T-1992 Truck Inventory and Use Survey (U.S. file 2.6 Mb)Document N/A
Back to top
Additional information on  Transportation Reports
Source:  *U.S. CensusBureau*Last Revised:  *Thursday, 19-Aug-2004 14:04:30 EDT*Census Bureau Links:   Home·Census 2000·Subjects A to Z·FAQs·Search·Data Tools·Catalog·Quality·Privacy Policy·Policies·Contact Us
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY

 3,262

 3,793

 4,437

 3,850

 4,901

 4,262

 4,409

 3,484

 4,500

 6,338

 5,841

 5,340

 6,202

 2,979

 3,915

 5,716

 5,105

 3,767

 4,715

 3,826

 4,336

 4,314

 3,992

 3,680

 4,234

 4,318

 5,122

 6,703

 6,448

 7,327

 5,753

 95,000

 93,349

 92,285

 91,886

 90,949

 91,057

 90,553

 90,214

 89,013

 88,838

 90,417

 91,445

 91,946

 93,240

 91,408

 90,557

 91,460

 91,736

 90,728

 90,671

 89,772

 89,403

 89,031

 88,372

 87,449

 87,099

 86,846

 87,370

 89,369

 91,026

 93,436

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

OCTOBER 2000 SHASTA LAKE FLOOD CONTROL REQUIREMENTS RUN DATE: November 29, 2000

 98,262

 97,142

 96,722

 95,736

 95,850

 95,319

 94,962

 93,698

 93,513

 95,176

 96,258

 96,785

 98,148

 96,219

 95,323

 96,273

 96,565

 95,503

 95,443

 94,497

 94,108

 93,717

 93,023

 92,052

 91,683

 91,417

 91,968

 94,073

 95,817

 98,353

 99,189

 4,531,000

 4,509,000

 4,488,000

 4,467,000

 4,445,000

 4,424,000

 4,403,000

 4,382,000

 4,360,000

 4,339,000

 4,318,000

 4,296,000

 4,275,000

 4,254,000

 4,232,000

 4,211,000

 4,190,000

 4,168,000

 4,147,000

 4,126,000

 4,104,000

 4,083,000

 4,062,000

 4,041,000

 4,019,000

 3,998,000

 3,977,000

 3,955,000

 3,934,000

 3,913,000

 3,891,000

 SHASTA

 INFLOW 

C. F. S. 

 PREV DAY

 F. C. PAR 

 (COL 3) 

 X .95 

 F. C. 

 PARAM 

 (COLS. 

 1 + 2 ) 

 .0356* 

 X DAYS 

 12/23 THRU

3/20 

 530,000

 MINUS 

 F. C. 

 PARAM

 (COL 3)

 COLS 

 4 X 5 

 F. C. 

 RESERV 

 (1,300,000 

 - COL 6 ) 

 MINUS 

 14,943 

 PER DAY

 AFTER 

 3/20 

 ADJUSTED

 F. C. 

 RESERV 

 (7-8) 

 PERM 

 STORAGE 

 COMMENTS:

 * LEAP YEAR CONSTANT = .0352 

 CONSTANT .0356 = 1,300,000 / (TOTAL DAYS X (530,000 - 110,000 ) )

 IF COL 3 IS GREATER THAN 530,000 OR LESS THAN 110,000 USE THOSE VALUES FOR COL 3 INSTEAD OF THE COMPUTED VALUE.

 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 

 100,000
### §277d–26. Lower Colorado River emergency flood control works; agreements with Mexico for joint construction, operation and maintenance

The Secretary of State, acting through the United States Commissioner, International Boundary and Water Commission, United States and Mexico, is authorized to conclude, with the appropriate official or officials of the Government of Mexico, agreements for emergency flood control measures of international character in the reaches of the lower Colorado River between Imperial Dam and the Gulf of California, in both the United States and Mexico, such agreements to provide: (a) for the joint clearing and maintaining free of trees and brush the bed and banks of the channel; for removing sediment deposits from the river channel; and (b) for corrective actions to guard against sedimentation and consequent aggradation of the river channel incident to desilting operations at diversion dams in the two countries: Provided, That, prior approval of the Secretary of the Interior is required of any proposed agreement with Mexico under clause (b) of this section which would involve construction and/or operation of works on the Colorado River in the United States under the jurisdiction of the Secretary. The measures contemplated herein are for the purpose of controlling floods on the lower Colorado River in accordance with article 13 of the 1944 Water Treaty with Mexico, and accomplishment thereof by the International Boundary and Water Commission, United States Section, would be in accord with the Memorandum of Understanding "as to Functions and Jurisdiction of Agencies of the United States in Relation to the Colorado and Tijuana Rivers and the Rio Grande Below Fort Quitman, Texas, Under Water Treaty Signed at Washington, February 3, 1944," between the Department of State and the United States Section, International Boundary and Water Commission and the Department of the Interior dated February 14, 1945.

(Pub. L. 88–411, §1, Aug. 10, 1964, 78 Stat. 386.)
_______________________________________ __ Michigan Supreme Court 

# Order

Lansing, Michigan

July 31, 2006 Clifford W. Taylor, Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh
Elizabeth A. Weaver 130971 Marilyn Kelly Maura D. Corrigan Robert P. Young, Jr. Stephen J. Markman, JEN-KEL CONSTRUCTION CO., INC., Justices Plaintiff-Appellant,

v SC: 130971 COA: 257856 Ottawa CC: 02-042329-CK CITY OF HOLLAN D and HOLLAND BOARD OF PUBLIC WORKS, Defendants-Appellees.

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the March 9, 2006 judgment of the Court of Appeals is consid ered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.

d0724 I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

July 31, 2006

Clerk
**Exhibit 23.1**

**CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**

We consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration StatementsNo. 333-135109 on Form S-3, No. 333-128501 on Form S-8 and No. 333-149285 on Form F-4 of our reports dated February 27, 2008, relating to the consolidated financial statements of Quintana Maritime Limited and the effectiveness ofQuintana Maritime Limited’s internal control over financial reporting, appearing in this Annual Report on Form 10-K of Quintana Maritime Limited for the year ended December 31, 2007. 

/s/ Deloitte 

Deloitte. 

Hadjipavlou, Sofianos & Cambanis S.A. 

Athens, Greece 

February 28, 2008
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Lightwave Logic, Inc. (the Company) for the year ended December 31, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, James S. Marcelli, Chief Executive Officer of our Company, certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that, to my knowledge:

1.

The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2.

The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of our Company.

|                      |  |                              
|--------------------- |  | -----------------------------
|Date:  March 31, 2011 |  | /s/ James S. Marcelli        
|                      |  | James S. Marcelli            
|                      |  | Chief Executive Officer      
|                      |  | (Principal Executive Officer)
§ 9.81 Fiddletown. ( a ) *Name.* The name of the viticultural area described in this section is “Fiddletown.”
( b ) *Approved maps.* The approved maps for the Fiddletown viticultural area are four U.S.G.S. maps entitled: ( 1 ) Fiddletown, CA, 1949, 7.5 minute series;
( 2 ) Amador City, CA, 1962, 7.5 minute series;
( 3 ) Pine Grove, CA, 1948 (photoinspected 1973), 7.5 minute series;
( 4 ) Aukum, CA, 1952 (photorevised 1973), 7.5 minute series.
( c ) *Boundaries.* The Fiddletown viticultural area is located in Amador County, California. The boundaries are as follows: ( 1 ) From the beginning point at the north boundary where Fiddletown Shenandoah Road crosses Big Indian Creek in Section 28, Township 8 N, Range 11 E, proceed in a southwesterly direction following Big Indian Creek through the southeast corner of Section 29, crossing the northwest corner of Section 32 to where it meets Section 31;
( 2 ) Then in a southerly direction follow the Section line between Sections 31 and 32, Township 8 N, Range 11 E, and Sections 5 and 6, 7 and 8, Township 7 N, Range 11 E, to where the Section line meets the South Fork of Dry Creek;
( 3 ) Then following the South Fork of Dry Creek in an easterly direction crossing the lower portions of Sections 8, 9, 10, 11, 12 and into Township 8 N, Range 12 E, at Section 7 and across Section 7 to where it meets Section 8;
( 4 ) Then north following the Section line between Sections 7 and 8, 5 and 6 into Township 8 N, Range 12 E, between Sections 31 and 32, to Big Indian Creek; and
( 5 ) Then following Big Indian Creek in a northwesterly direction through Sections 31, 30, 25, 26 and 27, returning to the point of beginning.
[T.D. ATF-147, 48 FR 45239, Oct. 4, 1983, as amended by T.D. ATF-249, 52 FR 5959, Feb. 27, 1987]
(No. 73-CC-360

#### Beauchamp’s Auto Service, Claimant, *vs.*State of Illinois, Department of Transportation, Respondent.

*Opinion filed April 25, 1974.*

Beauchamps Auto Service, Claimant, pro se.

William J. Scott, Attorney General; Saul R. Wexler, Assistant Attorney General, for Respondent.

Per Curiam.
### §§231, 232. Repealed. June 25, 1948, ch. 645, §21, 62 Stat. 862, eff. Sept. 1, 1948

Section 231, acts June 15, 1917, ch. 30, title VIII, §1, 40 Stat. 226; Mar. 28, 1940, ch. 72, §6, 54 Stat. 80, related to false statements to influence conduct of foreign governments toward the United States. See section 954 of Title 18, Crimes and Criminal Procedure.

Section 232, acts June 15, 1917, ch. 30, title VIII, §2, 40 Stat. 226; Mar. 28, 1940, ch. 72, §6, 54 Stat. 80, related to wrongful assumption of character of diplomatic or consular officer. See section 915 of Title 18.
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

NO. 03-05-00391-CR

NO. 03-05-00392-CR

Domingo Estrada, Appellant

v.

The State of Texas, Appellee

FROM THE COUNTY COURT AT LAW NO. 1 OF CALDWELL COUNTY

NOS. 29204 & 31343, HONORABLE EDWARD L. JARRETT, JUDGE PRESIDING

M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N

Appellant Domingo Estrada appeared with counsel at a hearing ordered by this Court

and announced that he no longer desires to prosecute these appeals. See Tex. R. App. P. 38.8(b),

42.2(a). The appeals are dismissed.

__________________________________________

Bea Ann Smith, Justice

Before Justices B. A. Smith, Puryear and Waldrop

Dismissed on Appellant’s Motion

Filed: February 3, 2006

Do Not Publish
Editorial Note on Part 416
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 416 appear at 68 FR 53509, Sept. 11, 2003.

§ 416.2095 Pass-along of Federal benefit increases. ( a ) *General.* This section and the four sections that follow describe the rules for passing along increases in the Federal SSI benefit to recipients of State supplementary payments. ( 1 ) Section 416.2095(b) indicates when the pass-along rules apply to State supplementary payments.
( 2 ) Section 416.2096 describes the basic pass-along rules. The States must have an agreement to “pass-along” increases in Federal SSI benefits. A State passes along an increase when it maintains (rather than decreases) the levels of all its supplementary payments after a Federal benefit increase has occurred. Generally, a pass-along of the increase permits recipients to receive an additional amount in combined benefits equal to the Federal benefit increase. Except for the supplementary payment level made to residents of Medicaid facilities (see § 416.2096(d)), a State can decrease one or more of its payment levels if it meets an annual total expenditures test.
( 3 ) Section 416.2097 explains the required combined supplementary/SSI payment level.
( 4 ) Section 416.2098 explains how to compute the March 1983, December 1981, and December 1976 supplementary payment levels.
( 5 ) Section 416.2099 discusses what information a State must provide to the Commissioner concerning its supplementation programs so that the Commissioner can determine whether the State is in compliance. That section also discusses the basis for findings of noncompliance and what will occur if a State is found out of compliance.
( b ) *When the pass-along provisions apply.* ( 1 ) The pass-along requirements apply to all States (and the District of Columbia) that make supplementary payments on or after June 30, 1977, and wish to participate in the Medicaid program.
( 2 ) The pass-along requirements apply to both optional State supplementary payments of the type described in § 416.2001(a) and mandatory minimum State supplementary payments as described in § 416.2001(c), whether or not these State supplementary payments are Federally administered.
( 3 ) The requirements apply to State supplementary payments both for recipients who receive Federal SSI benefits and those who, because of countable income, receive only a State supplementary payment.
( 4 ) The requirements apply to State supplementary payments for recipients eligible for a State supplementary payment on or after June 30, 1977.
( 5 ) Supplementary payments made by a State include payments made by a political subdivision (including Indian tribes) where— ( i ) The payment levels are set by the State; and
( ii ) The payments are funded in whole or in part by the State.
[52 FR 36241, Sept. 28, 1987, as amended at 54 FR 19165, May 4, 1989; 62 FR 38455, July 18, 1997]
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY HIGH

 5,149

 4,552

 4,521

 2,871

 3,148

 2,759

 3,293

 2,687

 749

 2,319

 2,468

 6,785

 5,255

 4,363

 4,937

 4,815

 7,766

 9,673

 8,868

 10,052

 10,747

 11,526

 12,535

 11,412

 11,128

 9,100

 10,620

 10,610

 11,439

 14,730

 13,258

 936

 754

 778

 485

 463

 374

 352

 305

 290

 316

 319

 377

 442

 572

 503

 559

 720

 1,027

 1,052

 1,190

 1,174

 1,091

 929

 1,387

 1,469

 1,373

 2,234

 3,097

 4,169

 5,187

 4,013

 3,095

 2,585

 2,049

 1,307

 978

 902

 1,042

 792

 381

 722

 949

 2,571

 2,345

 2,329

 2,190

 2,582

 3,233

 4,189

 4,434

 5,050

 5,577

 5,639

 5,682

 6,004

 6,536

 5,930

 6,125

 6,587

 7,814

 9,493

 8,893

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

MARCH 2010 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: April 2, 2010

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

PORT CHICAGO TOP IN SUISUN BAY
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY ELEV

 967.42

 967.27

 967.24

 967.23

 967.10

 967.06

 967.05

 967.16

 967.02

 966.96

 966.82

 966.68

 966.62

 966.42

 966.22

 965.98

 965.89

 965.89

 966.58

 966.85

 966.68

 966.44

 966.54

 966.39

 966.29

 966.48

 966.53

 966.54

 966.49

 966.47

 966.32

 2,178.8

 2,176.1

 2,175.6

 2,175.4

 2,173.0

 2,172.3

 2,172.1

 2,174.1

 2,171.6

 2,170.5

 2,168.0

 2,165.4

 2,164.3

 2,160.7

 2,157.1

 2,152.8

 2,151.2

 2,151.2

 2,163.6

 2,168.5

 2,165.4

 2,161.1

 2,162.9

 2,160.2

 2,158.4

 2,161.8

 2,162.7

 2,162.9

 2,162.0

 2,161.6

 2,158.9

STORAGE

-4.0

-2.7

-0.5

-0.2

-2.4

-0.7

-0.2

+2.0

-2.5

-1.1

-2.5

-2.5

-1.1

-3.6

-3.6

-4.3

-1.6

+0.0

+12.5

+4.9

-3.1

-4.3

+1.8

-2.7

-1.8

+3.4

+0.9

+0.2

-0.9

-0.4

-2.7

CHANGE

 1,947

 2,529

 3,168

 3,395

 2,472

 3,402

 3,413

 4,607

 2,746

 3,922

 2,701

 2,951

 3,374

 2,622

 3,024

 2,818

 3,794

 4,326

 10,678

 6,655

 4,325

 4,182

 6,134

 2,400

 4,493

 6,671

 4,754

 4,020

 3,634

 3,629

 4,064

INFLOW

 3,879

 3,818

 3,363

 3,364

 3,557

 3,646

 3,414

 3,513

 3,987

 4,337

 3,887

 4,058

 3,751

 4,317

 4,715

 4,883

 4,567

 4,326

 4,394

 4,172

 5,859

 6,317

 5,222

 3,768

 5,357

 4,859

 4,293

 3,886

 4,079

 3,775

 5,399

POWER

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

SPILL

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

OUTLET

 86

 86

 80

 123

 107

 123

 91

 85

 43

 133

 91

 170

 170

 128

 133

 122

 42

 0

 0

 21

 16

 53

 0

 0

 48

 80

 5

 43

 11

 37

 32

C.F.S.

 .16

 .16

 .15

 .23

 .20

 .23

 .17

 .16

 .08

 .25

 .17

 .32

 .32

 .24

 .25

 .23

 .08

 .00

 .00

 .04

 .03

 .10

 .00

 .00

 .09

 .15

 .01

 .08

 .02

 .07

 .06

INCHES

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .07

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .02

 .80

 1.82

 2.80

 .02

 .00

 1.45

 .07

 .00

 1.01

 .02

 .00

 .01

 .00

 .00

PRECIP

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

OCTOBER 2004 SHASTA LAKE DAILY OPERATIONS RUN DATE: November 16, 2004

IN LAKE

EVAPORATION

INCHES

C.F.S.

COMPUTED*

1000 ACRE-FEET

RELEASE - C.F.S.

RIVER

TOTALS -23.7 122,850 132,762 0 0 2,159 4.05 8.09

ACRE-FEET -23,700 243,673 263,333 0 0 4,282

COMMENTS:

* COMPUTED INFLOW IS THE SUM OF CHANGE IN STORAGE, RELEASES AND EVAPORATION.

SUMMARY

RELEASE (ACRE-FEET)

POWER 263,333

SPILL 0

OUTLET

TOTAL

 0

 263,333

PRECIPITATION

THIS MONTH =

TO DATE =

 8.09

JULY 1, 2004 8.11

 2,182.9
EXHIBIT 11


                      FIRST KEYSTONE CORPORATION
               COMPUTATION OF EARNINGS PER COMMON SHARE

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>

                    Six Month Period Ended June 30,
                             2000 and 1999

(Dollars in Thousands)

                                             2000          1999
<S>                                          <C>           <C>
Primary
  Net Income                                 $   2,481            $   2,523
    Shares
      Weighted average number of
        common shares outstanding                   2,833,727               2,883,826
      Adjustments - increases or
        decreases                                        None                    None
      Weighted average number of
        common shares outstanding
        as adjusted                                 2,833,727               2,883,826

      Primary earnings per common
        share                                $     .88     $     .87


Assuming full dilution
  Net Income                                 $   2,481     $   2,523
    Shares
      Weighted average number of
        common shares outstanding                   2,833,727               2,883,826
      Adjustments - increases or
        decreases                                        None                    None
      Weighted average number of
        common shares outstanding
        as adjusted                                 2,833,727               2,883,826

      Earnings per common share
        assuming full dilution               $     .88     $     .87


</TABLE>

                                 20