alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE BALANCE
SHEET AT SEPTEMBER 30, 1996, AND THE STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS FOR THE SIX MONTHS
ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 1996 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1996
<CASH>                                         906,000
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  161,900
<ALLOWANCES>                                    29,900
<INVENTORY>                                     70,600
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                      13,133,200
<DEPRECIATION>                               9,986,000
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               4,441,800
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        1,831,100
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 4,441,800
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             3,858,400
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                2,767,500
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                              (31,900)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                68,900
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             146,300
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                976,600
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            976,600
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   976,600
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    32.29
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
!

!

!

!

£¤30

Conda

Nounan

Bennington

Georgetown

Known Phosphate Lease Areas on the Caribou National Forest

Known Phosphate Lease Areas (KPLA)

Active Lease outside KPLA

KPLA with No Active Lease

KPLA with Active Leases

KPLA Outside of Roadless Areas

Idaho Roadless Areas

National Forest System Lands

(Other ownership is not displayed)
#### § 423.5 Process against Social Security Administration officials in their individual capacities.

Process to be served on Social Security Administration officials in their individual capacities must be served in compliance with the requirements for service of process on individuals who are not governmental officials. The Office of the General Counsel is authorized but not required to accept process to be served on Social Security Administration officials in their individual capacities if the suit relates to an employee's official duties.
#### § 404.1592b What is expedited reinstatement?

The expedited reinstatement provision provides you another option for regaining entitlement to benefits when we previously terminated your entitlement to disability benefits due to your work activity. The expedited reinstatement provision provides you the option of requesting that your prior entitlement to disability benefits be reinstated, rather than filing a new application for a new period of entitlement. Since January 1, 2001, you can request to be reinstated to benefits if you stop doing substantial gainful activity within 60 months of your prior termination. You must not be able to do substantial gainful activity because of your medical condition. Your current impairment must be the same as or related to your prior impairment and you must be disabled. To determine if you are disabled, we will use our medical improvement review standard that we use in our continuing disability review process. The advantage of using the medical improvement review standard is that we will generally find that you are disabled unless your impairment has improved so that you are able to work or unless an exception under the medical improvement review standard process applies. We explain the rules for expedited reinstatement in §§ 404.1592c through 404.1592f.

[70 FR 57142, Sept. 30, 2005]
**EXHIBIT32.1**

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO**

**18 USC, SECTION 1350,**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

          In connection with the amended annual report of Northern Ethanol, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-KSB/A1 for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2007, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, the undersigned, in the capacity and on the date indicated        below, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:

 

|   | 1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Rule 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|--------|----|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

|   | 2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. |
|--------|----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

 

| Dated: September 23, 2008 | s/ Gordon Laschinger________________   |
|---------------------------|---------------------------------------------|

|   | Gordon Laschinger, Chief Executive Officer |
|--------|--------------------------------------------|
# C_2012160EN.01002301.xml

| 6.6.2012 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 160/23 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

6.6.2012

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 160/23

---

Notice concerning a request in accordance with to Article 30 of Directive 2004/17/EC — Deadline extension

Request from a contracting entity

2012/C 160/09

On 29 March 2012, the Commission received a request under Article 30(5) of Directive 2004/17/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 31 March 2004 coordinating the procurement procedures of entities operating in the water, energy, transport and postal services sectors (1).

1

This request, from EniPower SpA, concerns the production and sale of electricity in Italy. It was published on page 6 of OJ C 131, 5.5.2012. The initial deadline was 2 July 2012.

Given that the Commission needs to obtain and analyse additional information, and in accordance with the second sentence of Article 30(6), the period granted to the Commission for deciding on this request is hereby extended by three months.

The final deadline is therefore 2 October 2012.

---

(1)  OJ L 134, 30.4.2004, p. 1.

1

---
Exhibit 10.5


 






    1 


     

    





    2 


     

    





    3 


     

    





    4 


     

    





    5 


     

    





    6 


     

    





    7 


     

    





    8 


     

    





    9 


     

    





    10 


     

    





    11 


     

    





    12 


     

    





    13 


     

    





    14 


     

    





    15 


     

    





    16 


     

    





    17 


     

    





    18 


     

    





    19 


     

    





    20 


     

    





    21 


     

    





    22 


     

    





    23 


     

    





    24 


     

    

 






    25 


     

    





    26 


     

    





    27 


     

    





    28
### §2464. Ethical issues in international health research

#### (a) In general

The Secretary shall make available funds for international exchanges to provide opportunities to researchers in developing countries to participate in activities related to ethical issues in human subject research, as described in subsection (c).

#### (b) Coordination with other programs

The Secretary shall coordinate programs conducted pursuant to this section with similar programs that may be conducted by the United States Agency for International Development and other Federal agencies as part of United States international health programs, particularly with respect to research and treatment of infectious diseases.

#### (c) Ethical issues in human subject research

For purposes of subsection (a), the phrase "activities related to ethical issues in human subject research" includes courses of study, conferences, and fora on development of and compliance with international ethical standards for clinical trials involving human subjects, particularly with respect to responsibilities of researchers to individuals and local communities participating in such trials, and on management and monitoring of such trials based on such international ethical standards.

(Pub. L. 107–228, div. A, title II, §228, Sept. 30, 2002, 116 Stat. 1371.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section was enacted as part of the Department of State Authorization Act, Fiscal Year 2003, and also as part of the Foreign Relations Authorization Act, Fiscal Year 2003, and not as part of the Mutual Educational and Cultural Exchange Act of 1961 which comprises this chapter.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Definition

For definition of "Secretary" as used in this section, see section 3 of Pub. L. 107–228, set out as a note under section 2651 of this title.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent *

except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision **

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

 FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

TING ZHOU,

 Petitioner,

 v.

ERIC H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General,

 Respondent.

No. 11-71253

Agency No. A095-673-923

MEMORANDUM*

On Petition for Review of an Order of the

Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted September 10, 2012** 

Before: WARDLAW, CLIFTON, and N.R. SMITH, Circuit Judges. 

Ting Zhou, a native and citizen of China, petitions for review of an order of

the Board of Immigration Appeals (“BIA”) denying her motion to reopen removal

proceedings conducted in absentia. Our jurisdiction is governed by 8 U.S.C.

§ 1252. Reviewing for abuse of discretion the BIA’s denial of a motion to reopen,

FILED

SEP 24 2012

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
2 11-71253

Najmabadi v. Holder, 597 F.3d 983, 986 (9th Cir. 2010), we deny in part and

dismiss in part the petition for review.

The BIA did not abuse its discretion by denying Zhou’s motion to reopen on

the grounds that it was number barred, see 8 C.F.R. § 1003.2(c)(2) (providing that,

generally, “a party may file only one motion to reopen removal proceedings . . . .”),

and that she had failed to present evidence of changed conditions in China material

to her claim to asylum in order to warrant an exception to the numerical limitation

applicable to motions to reopen, see Najmabadi, 597 F.3d at 986 (“The BIA can

deny a motion to reopen” based on changed country conditions for “failure to

introduce previously unavailable, material evidence” (citation and internal

quotation marks omitted)).

We lack jurisdiction to review the BIA’s refusal to reopen Zhou’s removal

proceedings sua sponte. See Mejia-Hernandez v. Holder, 633 F.3d 818, 823-24

(9th Cir. 2011).

Finally, because our determination regarding the number bar is dispositive,

we decline to consider Zhou’s allegation of lack of notice. See Mendez-Alcaraz v.

Gonzales, 464 F.3d 842, 844 (9th Cir. 2006) (declining to reach nondispositive

challenges to a BIA order).

PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED in part; DISMISSED in part.
EXHIBIT 32.2



             CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER
                  PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

                        AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
            SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



     In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10Q of First
Keystone Corporation (the "Corporation") for the period ended March
31, 2007, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the
"Report"), I, Diane C.A. Rosler, Chief Financial Officer, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as added by Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:

    1.  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
        13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

    2.  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
        all material respects, the financial condition and results
        of operations of the Corporation as of and for the period
        covered by the Report.



                                  /s/ Diane C.A. Rosler
                                  Diane C.A. Rosler
                                  Chief Financial Officer


Date:  May 9, 2007


                                26
##### Table of Contents



UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
 Washington, D.C. 20549
 FORM 8-K
 CURRENT REPORT
Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
 Date of Report (Date of earliest event reported): July 18, 2011
 Breeze-Eastern Corporation
  Delaware
State or Other Jurisdiction of 
Incorporation of Organization)
    
    001-07872
(Commission
File Number)
    
    95-4062211
(IRS Employer
Identification Number)
 35 Melanie Lane 
Whippany, New Jersey
(Address of Principal Executive Offices)
    
    07981
(Zip Code)
 (908) 688-2440
 
 see
 o
 o
 o
 o




---



TABLE OF CONTENTS  Item 1.01. Entry into a Material Definitive AgreementItem 3.03. Material Modification to Rights of Security HoldersItem 5.03. Amendments to Articles of Incorporation or Bylaws; Change in Fiscal YearItem 8.01. Other EventsItem 9.01. Financial Statements and ExhibitsSIGNATURESEX-3.1EX-4.1EX-99.1    Table of Contents  
 Item 1.01. Entry into a Material Definitive Agreement.
  
 Item 3.03. Material Modification to Rights of Security Holders.
 Rights
Agreement Company Board Rights Common Stock Record Date Preferred Stock Purchase Price
 Distribution Date Stock Acquisition Date Acquiring Person Exempted Person
 Right Certificates




---



##### Table of Contents



Flip-in Event




---



##### Table of Contents



Flip-over Event
  Redemption Price




---



##### Table of Contents



Item 5.03. Amendments to Articles of Incorporation or Bylaws; Change in Fiscal Year
  
 Item 8.01. Other Events.
  
 Item 9.01. Financial Statements and Exhibits.
  No.
    
    Description3.1
    
    Certificate of Designation, Rights, Preferences of Series A Preferred Stock4.1
    
    Rights Agreement, dated as of July 14, 2011 effective as of July 18, 2011 between Breeze-Eastern Corporation
and Computershare Trust Company, N.A.99.1
    
    Press Release of Breeze-Eastern Corporation dated July 19, 2011




---



##### Table of Contents



SIGNATURES
  BREEZE-EASTERN CORPORATIONDated: July 19, 2011
    /s/ Mark D. MishlerMark D. MishlerSenior Vice President, Chief Financial Officer,
Treasurer and Secretary
[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 77 (Thursday, April 21, 2011)]
[Notices]
[Pages 22407-22408]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2011-9722]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


National Institute on Aging; Notice of Closed Meeting

    Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended (5 U.S.C. App.), notice is hereby given of the following 
meeting.

[[Page 22408]]

    The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the 
provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 
U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could 
disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as 
patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals 
associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would 
constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

    Name of Committee: National Institute on Aging Special Emphasis 
Panel; Aging and Mobility.
    Date: May 12, 2011.
    Time: 2 p.m. to 6 p.m.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate grant applications.
    Place: National Institute on Aging, Gateway Building, 7201 
Wisconsin Avenue, Suite 2C218, Bethesda, MD 20892 (Telephone 
Conference Call).
    Contact Person: Alfonso R. Latoni, PhD, Deputy Chief And 
Scientific Review Officer, Scientific Review Branch, National 
Institute on Aging, 7201 Wisconsin Avenue, Suite 2C218, Bethesda, MD 
20892, 301-402-7702, <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#347558525b5a475b1a7855405b5a5d745a5d5c1a535b42"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="b5f4d9d3dadbc6da9bf9d4c1dadbdcf5dbdcdd9bd2dac3">[email protected]</span></a>.

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.866, Aging 
Research, National Institutes of Health, HHS)

    Dated: April 14, 2011.
Jennifer S. Spaeth,
Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. 2011-9722 Filed 4-20-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
§ 422.425 How will we conduct our review of the debt? ( a ) *You must request review and present evidence.* If you receive a notice described in § 422.405, you have the right to have us review the debt. To exercise this right, you must request review and give us evidence that you do not owe all or part of the debt or that we do not have the right to collect it. If you do not request review and give us this evidence within 60 calendar days from the date of our notice, we may issue the garnishment order to your employer without further delay. If you request review of the debt and present evidence within that 60 calendar-day period, we will not send a garnishment order to your employer unless and until we consider all of the evidence and send you our findings that all or part of the debt is overdue and we have the right to collect it.
( b ) *Review of the evidence.* If you request review of the debt, we will review our records related to the debt and any evidence that you present.
( c ) *Our findings.* Following our review of all of the evidence, we will send you written findings, including the supporting rationale for the findings. Issuance of these findings will be our final action on your request for review. If we find that you do not owe the debt, or the debt is not overdue, or we do not have the right to collect it, we will not send a garnishment order to your employer.
#### Irene C. Albright et al., Respondents-Appellants, v. Jefferson County National Bank, Appellant-Respondent.

Present—Crosby, P. J., Cunningham, Taylor, Harris and McCurn, JJ.
[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 77 (Thursday, April 21, 2011)]
[Notices]
[Pages 22395-22396]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2011-9723]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION


Federal Advisory Committee Act; Open Internet Advisory Committee

AGENCY: Federal Communications Commission.

ACTION: Notice; of intent to establish.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: In accordance with the Federal Advisory Committee Act, the 
purpose of this notice is to announce that a Federal Advisory 
Committee, known as the ``Open Internet Advisory Committee'' 
(hereinafter ``the Committee''), is being established.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ellen Satterwhite, Federal 
Communications Commission, Consumer and Governmental Affairs Bureau, 
202-418-3626, e-mail: <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#50353c3c353e7e2331242435222738392435103633337e373f26"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="bbded7d7ded595c8dacfcfdec9ccd3d2cfdefbddd8d895dcd4cd">[email protected]</span></a>.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Chairman of the Federal Communications 
Commission (``FCC'') has determined that the establishment of the 
Committee is necessary and in the public interest in connection with 
the performance of duties imposed on the FCC by law. The Committee 
Management Secretariat, General Service Administration concurs with the 
establishment of the Committee. The purpose of the Committee is to 
track and evaluate the effects of the FCC's Open Internet rules 
(available at http://www.fcc.gov/Daily_Releases/Daily_Business/2010/db1223/FCC-10-201A1.pdf), and to provide any recommendations the 
Committee deems appropriate to the FCC regarding

[[Page 22396]]

policies and practices related to preserving the open Internet. The 
Committee will observe market developments regarding the freedom and 
openness of the Internet and will focus in particular on issues 
addressed in the FCC's Open Internet rules, such as transparency, 
reasonable network management practices, differences in treatment of 
fixed and mobile broadband services, specialized services, technical 
standards, and the state of competition.

Federal Communications Commission.
Marlene H. Dortch,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2011-9723 Filed 4-20-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6712-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
#### Katherine J. McNamee, Appellant, v. James E. C. Leavitt, as Administrator, etc., Respondent.

Order affirmed, with costs. No opinion. Present—Ingraham, P. J., McLaughlin, Laughlin, Clarke and Scott, J