alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY ELEV

 947.78

 947.41

 946.90

 946.24

 945.73

 945.24

 944.78

 944.31

 943.86

 943.20

 942.49

 941.89

 941.33

 940.77

 940.22

 939.50

 938.79

 938.27

 937.79

 937.08

 936.47

 935.91

 935.26

 934.75

 934.17

 933.50

 932.91

 932.30

 931.66

 931.06

 930.60

 1,840.7

 1,834.7

 1,826.4

 1,815.8

 1,807.6

 1,799.7

 1,792.4

 1,784.9

 1,777.7

 1,767.3

 1,756.1

 1,746.7

 1,737.9

 1,729.2

 1,720.7

 1,709.5

 1,698.5

 1,690.4

 1,683.0

 1,672.2

 1,662.8

 1,654.3

 1,644.5

 1,636.8

 1,628.0

 1,618.0

 1,609.2

 1,600.1

 1,590.6

 1,581.8

 1,575.0

STORAGE

-10.6

-6.0

-8.3

-10.6

-8.2

-7.9

-7.3

-7.5

-7.2

-10.4

-11.2

-9.4

-8.8

-8.7

-8.5

-11.2

-11.0

-8.0

-7.4

-10.9

-9.3

-8.5

-9.8

-7.7

-8.7

-10.0

-8.8

-9.1

-9.5

-8.9

-6.8

CHANGE

 2,032

 2,928

 2,244

 1,728

 2,320

 2,555

 2,787

 2,647

 2,729

 1,961

 1,385

 2,274

 2,830

 3,098

 2,668

 1,574

 1,846

 2,827

 3,187

 1,418

 2,763

 2,791

 2,365

 2,950

 2,742

 2,270

 2,482

 3,176

 1,885

 2,099

 2,979

INFLOW

 7,145

 5,733

 6,195

 6,856

 6,216

 6,296

 6,238

 6,200

 6,133

 7,072

 6,820

 6,887

 7,034

 7,315

 6,782

 7,056

 7,045

 6,717

 6,756

 6,709

 7,299

 6,997

 7,196

 6,674

 6,967

 7,132

 6,729

 7,558

 6,480

 6,391

 6,176

POWER

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

SPILL

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 204

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

OUTLET

 225

 220

 214

 237

 236

 217

 254

 220

 201

 154

 204

 139

 207

 184

 192

 159

 150

 158

 158

 202

 157

 94

 133

 159

 176

 198

 197

 188

 182

 173

 207

C.F.S.

 .47

 .46

 .45

 .50

 .50

 .46

 .54

 .47

 .43

 .33

 .44

 .30

 .45

 .40

 .42

 .35

 .33

 .35

 .35

 .45

 .35

 .21

 .30

 .36

 .40

 .45

 .45

 .43

 .42

 .40

 .48

INCHES

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .02

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

PRECIP

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

JULY 2014 SHASTA LAKE DAILY OPERATIONS RUN DATE: September 3, 2014

IN LAKE

EVAPORATION

INCHES

C.F.S.

COMPUTED*

1000 ACRE-FEET

RELEASE - C.F.S.

RIVER

TOTALS -276.2 75,540 208,804 0 204 5,795 12.70 .02

ACRE-FEET -276,200 149,834 414,163 0 405 11,494

COMMENTS:

* COMPUTED INFLOW IS THE SUM OF CHANGE IN STORAGE, RELEASES AND EVAPORATION.

SUMMARY

RELEASE (ACRE-FEET)

POWER 414,163

SPILL 0

OUTLET

TOTAL

 405

 414,568

PRECIPITATION

THIS MONTH =

TO DATE =

 .02

JULY 1, 2014 .02

 1,851.3

Table 3
A PROFESSIONAL CORPORATION

THE ARMY AND NAVY BUILDING 1627 I STREET, NW SUITE 1100 WASHINGTON, DC 20006-1605

202.912.4800 1.800.540.1355 202.912.4830 FA X www.cozen.com

Mark W. Atwood

Direct Phone 202-463-2513

matwood@cozen.com

VIA EMAIL

March 11, 2014

Ms. Esta Rosenberg

Office of International Aviation Department of Transportation 1200 New Jersey Ave S.E. Washington, D.C. 20590

Re: Application of Kona Associates, L.L.C. for Amendment of Exemption, Docket OST-2004-17689

Dear Ms. Rosenberg:

Attached per your request, please find the revised service list for the above referenced application, which was served on February 28, 2014.

Sincerely,

Mark W. Atwood Counsel for Kona Associates, L.L.C.

CC: Docket OST-2004-17689
FIRST DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

STATE OF FLORIDA

_____________________________

No. 1D17-2909

_____________________________

JEROME DICKEY,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellee.

_____________________________

On appeal from the Circuit Court for Leon County.

Martin A. Fitzpatrick, Judge.

September 26, 2018

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.

LEWIS, RAY, and M.K. THOMAS, JJ., concur.

_____________________________

Not final until disposition of any timely and 

authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 

9.331.

_____________________________
2

Jerome Dickey, pro se, Appellant.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, and Trisha Meggs Pate, 

Assistant Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.
§ 1011.230 Under what circumstances can VETS deny or revoke an award? ( a ) *Denial of award.* VETS may deny an award for any of the following reasons: ( 1 ) The applicant fails to provide information and/or documentation as requested under § 1011.225 of this part;
( 2 ) VETS determines that the chief executive officer, the chief human resources officer, or an equivalent official of the applicant falsely attested that the information on the application was true;
( 3 ) The employer is ineligible to receive an award pursuant to § 1011.120 of this part; or
( 4 ) The application does not satisfy all application requirements.
( b ) *Revocation of award.* Once the HIRE Vets Medallion Award has been awarded, VETS may revoke the recipient's award for the following reasons: ( 1 ) The HIRE Vets Medallion Award recipient fails to provide information and/or documentation as requested under § 1011.225 of this part;
( 2 ) VETS determines that the chief executive officer, the chief human resources officer, or an equivalent official of the recipient falsely attested that the information on the application was true;
( 3 ) The employer was ineligible to receive an award pursuant to § 1011.120 of this part; or
( 4 ) The employer violated the display restrictions at § 1011.405 of this part.
( c ) If VETS decides to deny or revoke an award, it will provide the employer with notice of the decision. An employer may request reconsideration of VETS' decision to deny or revoke an award pursuant to § 1011.500 of this part.
Exhibit
10.12


 


Chengdu
Puyi Bohui Information Technology Co., Ltd.


 


Party
A: Shenzhen Yingjiasheng Investment Partnership (Limited Partnership)


Party
B: Yu Haifeng


 


Through
amicable negotiation between the Parties hereto and upon the review and approval of the shareholders' meeting of the Company,
Party A voluntarily transfers the its holding equity of Chengdu Puyi Bohui Information Technology Co., Ltd., valuing at RMB 600,000
(accounting for 0.96% of the company's registered capital) to Party B. Party A shall guarantee that the transferred equity is
true, legal and valid without any mortgage or security. Party B voluntarily purchases the above-mentioned equity transferred by
Party A and assumes corresponding responsibilities, rights and interests in accordance with the provisions of the Company Law
and the Articles of Association.


 


The
agreement is made in quadruplicate, with each party holding one, and the Company shall keep one copy in record and submit one
copy to the registration authority. The agreement shall come into force upon the signing and seal of the Parties hereto.


 





Party A: Shenzhen Yingjiasheng
Investment Partnership (Limited Partnership)


 


/s/ Seal of Shenzhen Yingjiasheng Investment Partnership (Limited
Partnership)


 


Party B: Yu Haifeng


 


	By: 	/s/ Yu Haifeng	 




 


Target Company: Chengdu Puyi Bohui Information Technology Co.,
Ltd.


 


/s/ Seal of Chengdu Puyi Bohui Information Technology Co., Ltd.


 


March 14, 2016
```

[Congressional Bills 114th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 4281 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

114th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 4281

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to prohibit the inclusion of 
     social security numbers of donors in charitable contribution 
                    substantiation acknowledgements.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           December 17, 2015

  Mr. Rothfus (for himself and Mr. Higgins) introduced the following 
      bill; which was referred to the Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to prohibit the inclusion of 
     social security numbers of donors in charitable contribution 
                    substantiation acknowledgements.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Charitable Giving Privacy Protection 
Act''.

SEC. 2. PROHIBITION ON INCLUSION OF SOCIAL SECURITY NUMBERS OF DONORS 
              IN CHARITABLE CONTRIBUTION SUBSTANTIATION 
              ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS.

    (a) In General.--Section 170(f)(8) of the Internal Revenue Code of 
1986 is amended by redesignating subparagraph (E) as subparagraph (F) 
and by inserting after subparagraph (D) the following:
                    ``(E) Prohibition on requiring or accepting 
                collection of social security numbers.--
                            ``(i) In general.--For purposes of this 
                        paragraph, the Secretary may not require or 
                        accept social security numbers of donors from 
                        donee organizations.
                            ``(ii) Use of alternative number.--The 
                        Secretary may require the use of an identifier 
                        other than a social security number for 
                        purposes of this paragraph.''.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) shall 
apply to taxable years beginning after the date of the enactment of 
this Act.
                                 <all>
```
### §2399d. Shipping differential

For the purpose of facilitating implementation of section 55305 of title 46, funds made available for the purposes of part I of subchapter I of this chapter or for purposes of part IV of subchapter II of this chapter may be used to make grants to recipients to pay all or any portion of such differential as is determined by the Secretary of Commerce to exist between United States and foreign-flag vessel charter or freight rates. Grants made under this section shall be paid with United States-owned foreign currencies wherever feasible.

(Pub. L. 87–195, pt. III, §640C, as added Pub. L. 93–189, §21, Dec. 17, 1973, 87 Stat. 726; amended Pub. L. 96–533, title VII, §708, Dec. 16, 1980, 94 Stat. 3159.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

In text, "section 55305 of title 46" substituted for "section 901(b) of the Merchant Marine Act, 1936 (46 U.S.C. 1241(b))" on authority of Pub. L. 109–304, §18(c), Oct. 6, 2006, 120 Stat. 1709, which Act enacted section 55305 of Title 46, Shipping.

#### Amendments

1980—Pub. L. 96–533 substituted "part IV of subchapter II of this chapter" for "subchapter IV of this chapter".

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### References to Part I Deemed To Include Section 2293

References to part I of subchapter I of this chapter are deemed to include a reference to section 2293 of this title. See section 2293(d)(1) of this title.
### §262k–2. Female genital mutilation

#### (a) Limitation

Beginning 1 year after September 30, 1996, the Secretary of the Treasury shall instruct the United States Executive Director of each international financial institution to use the voice and vote of the United States to oppose any loan or other utilization of the funds of their respective institution, other than to address basic human needs, for the government of any country which the Secretary of the Treasury determines—

(1) has, as a cultural custom, a known history of the practice of female genital mutilation; and

(2) has not taken steps to implement educational programs designed to prevent the practice of female genital mutilation.

#### (b) "International financial institution" defined

For purposes of this section, the term "international financial institution" shall include the institutions identified in section 532(b) of this Act.

(Pub. L. 104–208, div. A, title I, §101(c) [title V, §579], Sept. 30, 1996, 110 Stat. 3009–121, 3009–170.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

Section 532(b) of this Act, referred to in subsec. (b), is section 532(b) of Pub. L. 104–208, div. A, title I, §101(c) [title V], Sept. 30, 1996, 110 Stat. 3009–121, 3009–152, which is not classified to the Code.
### §290l–3. Federal Reserve banks as depositories

Any Federal Reserve Bank 1 which is requested to do so by the Bank may act as its depository, or as its fiscal agent, and the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System shall exercise general supervision over the carrying out of these functions.

(Pub. L. 101–513, title V, §562(c)(5), Nov. 5, 1990, 104 Stat. 2034.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Another section 562(c)(5) of Pub. L. 101–513 is set out as a note under section 2293 of this title.

1 So in original. Probably should not be capitalized.
### §214a. Fees erroneously charged and paid; refund

Whenever a fee is erroneously charged and paid for the issue of a passport to a person who is exempted from the payment of such a fee by section 214 of this title, the Department of State is authorized to refund to the person who paid such fee the amount thereof, and the money for that purpose is authorized to be appropriated.

(July 3, 1926, ch. 772, §3, 44 Stat. 887.)

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Certain Appropriation Accounts Abolished

Effective July 1, 1935, enumerated appropriation accounts appearing on the books of the Government were abolished and in lieu thereof there was established an account to be designated "Refund of Moneys Erroneously Received and Covered." See section 1322 of Title 31, Money and Finance.
ATTORNEY GRIEVANCE * IN THE COURT OF APPEALS

COMMISSION OF MARYLAND

* OF MARYLAND

v. * Misc. Docket AG No. 39

,

FREDERICK ARTHUR LOVEJOY * September Term, 201 9

O R D E R

UPON CONSIDERATION of the Amended Petition for Disciplinary or Remedial

Action filed by the Attorney Grievance Commission of Maryland filed pursuant to

Maryland Rule 19

- 737 and 19

- 721, the Show Cause Order, Petitioner’s Response to Show

Cause Order

, Respondent’s Response to Show Cause Order

, and the re cord herein, it is this

23rd day of January, 2020,

ORDERED , by the Court of Appeals of Maryland, that the Respondent, Frederick

Arthur Lovejoy, be and he hereby is, REPRIMANDED for violating Rules 3.4 (c) and 4.4

(a) of the Maryland Lawyers’ Rules of Professional Conduct.

/s/ Mary Ellen Barbera

Chief Judge
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY HIGH

 154

 140

 144

 155

 152

 151

 149

 145

 143

 144

 146

 147

 151

 149

 152

 155

 155

 158

 159

 158

 160

 161

 162

 164

 164

 167

 167

 164

 166

 169

 159

 112

 119

 118

 118

 120

 119

 122

 126

 131

 134

 136

 139

 138

 140

 142

 143

 146

 149

 152

 153

 152

 153

 152

 148

 145

 138

 131

 132

 133

 143

 142

 135

 130

 131

 140

 140

 139

 138

 137

 137

 139

 141

 143

 144

 145

 148

 149

 151

 153

 155

 156

 158

 158

 159

 158

 157

 156

 152

 151

 152

 157

 154

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

MARCH 2004 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: April 19, 2004

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

SAN ANDREAS ON THE SAN JOAQUIN RIVER
Exhibit 32.2 

**Certification Pursuantto 18 U.S.C. 1350, As Adopted Pursuant toSection 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**

        Inconnection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended November 30, 2004 (the“Report”) of Immucor, Inc. (the “Registrant”), as filed with theSecurities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, I certify, to the best of myknowledge, that: 

   (1)              The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the          Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and 

   (2)              The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material          respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant.
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA

FOURTH DISTRICT

EDWARD P. CAMPBELL,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellee.

No. 4D18-395

[April 12, 2018]

Appeal of order denying rule 3.850 motion from the Circuit Court for 

the Nineteenth Judicial Circuit, Martin County; Lawrence M. Mirman, 

Judge; L.T. Case No. 432012CF001218.

Edward P. Campbell, Raiford, pro se.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Heidi Bettendorf, 

Assistant Attorney General, West Palm Beach, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.

GERBER, C.J., TAYLOR and LEVINE, JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
#### § 411.205 What if I disagree with the PM's decision about whether I am making timely progress toward self-supporting employment?

If you disagree with the PM's decision, you may request that we review the decision. You must make the request before the 30th day after the date on which the PM sends the notice of its decision to you. We will consider you to be making timely progress toward self-supporting employment until we make a decision. We will send a written notice of our decision to you at your last known address. If we decide that you are no longer making timely progress toward self-supporting employment, our decision will be effective on the date on which we send the notice of the decision to you.
Editorial Note on Part 416
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 416 appear at 68 FR 53509, Sept. 11, 2003.

§ 416.216 You are a child of armed forces personnel living overseas. ( a ) *General rule.* For purposes of this part, *overseas* means any location outside the United States as defined in § 416.215; *i.e.*, the 50 States, the District of Columbia and the Northern Mariana Islands. You may be eligible for SSI benefits if you live overseas and if— ( 1 ) You are a child as described in § 416.1856;
( 2 ) You are a citizen of the United States; and
( 3 ) You are living with a parent as described in § 416.1881 who is a member of the armed forces of the United States assigned to permanent duty ashore overseas.
( b ) *Living with.* You are considered to be living with your parent who is a member of the armed forces if— ( 1 ) You physically live with the parent who is a member of the armed forces overseas; or
( 2 ) You are not living in the same household as the military parent but your presence overseas is due to his or her permanent duty assignment.
[58 FR 4897, Jan. 19, 1993; 58 FR 9597, Feb. 22, 1993, as amended at 59 FR 41400, Aug. 12, 1994. Redesignated at 61 FR 10277, Mar. 13, 1996; 70 FR 61366, Oct. 24, 2005]
### §2901. Congressional statement of findings and declaration of purpose

(a) The Congress hereby finds that—

(1) the post-World War II evolution of the relationship between Japan and the United States to peacetime friendship and partnership is one of the most significant developments of the postwar period;

(2) the Agreement Between Japan and the United States of America Concerning the Ryukyu Islands and the Daito Islands, signed at Washington and Tokyo on June 17, 1971, is a major achievement and symbol of the new relationship between the United States and Japan; and

(3) the continuation of close United States-Japan friendship and cooperation will make a vital contribution to the prospects for peace, prosperity, and security in Asia and the world.

(b) It is therefore the purpose of this chapter to provide for the use of an amount equal to a part of the total sum payable by Japan to the United States in connection with the reversion of Okinawa to Japanese administration and the remaining funds of the amount set aside in 1962 for educational and cultural exchange with Japan (known as the G.A.R.I.O.A. Account) to aid education and culture at the highest level in order to enhance reciprocal people-to-people understanding and to support the close friendship and mutuality of interests between the United States and Japan.

(Pub. L. 94–118, §2, Oct. 20, 1975, 89 Stat. 603.)

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Short Title

Pub. L. 94–118, §1, Oct. 20, 1975, 89 Stat. 603, provided: "That this Act [enacting this chapter] may be cited as the 'Japan-United States Friendship Act'."
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY HIGH

 232

 235

 240

 240

 240

 247

 235

 248

 243

 232

 231

 231

 235

 226

 229

 229

 230

 230

 230

 223

 225

 229

 225

 226

 227

 224

 220

 221

 223

 224

 244

 170

 179

 185

 183

 177

 176

 178

 178

 171

 181

 179

 185

 185

 172

 166

 168

 156

 158

 158

 167

 165

 171

 170

 173

 183

 178

 175

 164

 161

 171

 173

 216

 218

 222

 221

 221

 222

 215

 218

 215

 212

 212

 214

 213

 210

 207

 207

 206

 203

 204

 201

 203

 203

 204

 203

 206

 208

 205

 202

 200

 204

 209

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

MARCH 2013 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: May 3, 2013

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

SAN ANDREAS ON THE SAN JOAQUIN RIVER
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

DAY HIGH

 121

 121

 122

 121

 123

 142

 119

 118

 123

 94

 90

 96

 96

 93

 90

 90

 88

 86

 86

 88

 101

 101

 94

 90

 80

 92

 96

 93

 87

 82

 117

 116

 118

 114

 112

 113

 110

 112

 91

 89

 88

 88

 92

 88

 87

 88

 82

 82

 85

 82

 88

 94

 88

 81

 77

 75

 92

 87

 82

 76

 119

 119

 120

 118

 116

 118

 114

 114

 103

 92

 89

 92

 94

 90

 89

 89

 84

 84

 85

 86

 96

 98

 91

 87

 78

 84

 94

 90

 84

 80

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

APRIL 2016 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: May 11, 2016

HIGH LOW MEAN

 66.9

 68.2

 69.2

 65.9

 64.5

 67.4

 68.6

 69.1

 67.4

 64.4

 59.7

 62.3

 64.9

 64.8

 64.0

 64.7

 63.4

 63.1

 61.9

 59.6

 60.0

 58.8

 57.4

 59.2

 57.8

 57.6

 58.0

 58.2

 58.2

 59.4

 60.8

 62.1

 64.1

 62.2

 59.6

 62.7

 65.6

 65.1

 64.7

 57.5

 56.5

 58.0

 60.5

 61.4

 59.8

 59.8

 60.4

 58.9

 58.8

 56.7

 56.6

 57.1

 56.0

 56.5

 55.8

 54.7

 56.5

 55.9

 56.2

 56.5

 63.7

 65.1

 66.4

 64.3

 62.3

 64.8

 67.0

 67.1

 66.1

 61.4

 58.1

 60.0

 62.5

 62.9

 61.9

 62.3

 62.1

 61.1

 60.5

 57.8

 58.4

 58.4

 56.7

 57.7

 56.8

 56.3

 57.2

 57.0

 57.1

 57.9

HIGH LOW MEAN

 9.9

 9.7

 9.5

 9.4

 9.9

 9.1

 8.9

 8.9

 8.4

 9.4

 9.9

 9.5

 9.5

 9.5

 9.7

 9.8

 9.8

 9.8

 9.8

 9.8

 9.7

 9.5

 10.0

 10.0

 10.2

 10.3

 9.8

 9.7

 9.9

 9.9

 8.9

 8.7

 8.4

 8.5

 8.9

 8.1

 7.9

 7.8

 7.6

 8.0

 9.4

 8.9

 8.8

 8.7

 8.9

 9.0

 9.0

 9.4

 9.5

 9.6

 9.1

 9.2

 9.5

 9.7

 9.9

 9.8

 9.4

 9.5

 9.6

 9.6

 9.3

 9.1

 8.9

 9.0

 9.4

 8.7

 8.3

 8.3

 8.0

 8.6

 9.7

 9.3

 9.1

 9.1

 9.2

 9.3

 9.4

 9.6

 9.7

 9.7

 9.4

 9.3

 9.8

 9.8

 10.1

 10.0

 9.6

 9.6

 9.8

 9.7

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

RIPON ON THE STANISLAUS RIVER

 ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS WATER TEMPERATURE, DEG DISSOLVED OXYZEN, PPM