alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
(No. 4302

#### The Texas Company, a Delaware Corporation, Claimant, vs. State of Illinois, Respondent.

*Opinion filed November*14, *1950.*

Paul F. Schlicher, Attorney for Claimant.

Ivan A. Elliott, Attorney General; William H. Sumpter, Assistant Attorney General, for Respondent.

*162ScHUMAN, C. J.

Claimant, The Texas Company, a corporation, on various dates during periods from April 10, 1947 to June 30, 1947, and from November 4, 1948 to June 30,

1949 furnished gasoline, kerosene, liquid fuels, oils'and lubricants, pursuant to purchase orders from the Department of Finance, Division of Purchases and Supplies for the State of Illinois, to the Department of Public Works and Buildings, Department of Conservation, Department of Public Works and Buildings, and Department of Public Safety in the amount of $103.01.

A stipulation was entered into by the parties showing $7.74 was barred by limitation, and a balance of $95.27 is justly due and owing claimant.

Claimant’s schedule covering purchases made prior to July 1, 1947 were not received in time to be paid in regular course from the 64th Biennium Appropriations. Purchases between July 1, 1947 and June 30, 1949, for similar reasons, could not be paid from the 65th Biennium Appropriations, respective appropriations lapsing on September 30, 1947, and September 30, 1949.

By the repeated decisions of this Court, it has been held that where the facts are undisputed that the State has received supplies ordered by it in accordance with due authority, and has used the same, and that the bill therefor was not paid before the lapse of the appropriation out of which it could have been paid, an award for the amount may be made. *(Shell Petroleum Co.*v. State, *1637 C.C.R., 224; *Shonkwiler*v. *State,*11 C.C.R., 602, and other cases.)

An award is therefore entered in favor of the claimant, and allowed in the amount of $95.27.
###### Editorial Note on Part 416

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 416 appear at 68 FR 53509, Sept. 11, 2003.

#### § 416.915 Where and how to submit evidence.

You may give us evidence about your impairment at any of our offices or at the office of any State agency authorized to make disability or blindness determinations. You may also give evidence to one of our employees authorized to accept evidence at another place. For more information about this, see subpart C of this part.
###### Editorial Note on Part 416

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 416 appear at 68 FR 53509, Sept. 11, 2003.

#### § 416.626 How do we investigate an appointed representative payee?

After we select an individual to act as your representative payee, we will conduct a criminal background check on the appointed representative payee at least once every 5 years.

[84 FR 4326, Feb. 15, 2019, as amended at 84 FR 57320, Oct. 25, 2019]
EXHIBIT
32





CASCADE
TECHNOLOGIES CORP.





CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C.
Section 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
connection with the Annual Report of Cascade Technologies Corp. (the “Company”)
on Form 10-K for the year ending August 31, 2009 as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Jacqueline
Danforth, as Principal Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer of the
Company, hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant
to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1)           The
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)           The
information contained in this Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





Date:
      December 15, 2009
            By:
            /s/Jacqueline
      DanforthName:
      Jacqueline DanforthTitle:
      Principal Executive Officer and Principal Financial
Officer


A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 1350 of Title 18 of the
United States Code has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the
Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff
upon request.





The
foregoing certification is being furnished as an exhibit to the Report pursuant
to Item 601(b)(32) of Regulation S-K and Section 1350 of Title 18 of the United
States Code and, accordingly, is not being filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission as part of the Report and is not to be incorporated by
reference into any filing of the Company under the Securities Act of 1933 or the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (whether made before or after the date of the
Report, irrespective of any general incorporation language contained in such
filing.)
**Exhibit 23.2**

**CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement on Form S-8 (Registration No. 333-128353) and Registration Statements (No. 333-139712 and No. 333-136872) on Forms S-3 of BabyUniverse, Inc. (the “Company”) of our report dated June 13, 2005 appearing in this Annual Report on Form 10-K of the Company for the year ended December 31, 2006.

| /s/ Lieberman & Associates, P.A. |
|--------------------------------------|
|                                 |
| Fort Lauderdale, Florida             |
| April 2, 2007                        |
**EXHIBIT32.1**

 

**WRITTEN STATEMENT OF CHIEF EXECUTIVEOFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THESARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

The undersigned, the Chief Executive Officer and ChiefFinancial Officer of Cuisine Solutions, Inc. (the “Company”), each herebycertifies that, to his knowledge on the date hereof pursuant to 18 U.S.C.Section 1350(a), as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of The Sarbanes-Oxley Actof 2002, that:

 

(a)          the Quarterly Report onForm 10-Q for the period ended September 22, 2007 filed on the date hereof bythe Company with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “Report”) fullycomplies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

 

(b)         information contained inthe Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial conditionand results of operations of the Company.

 

 
| /s/ Stanislas Vilgrain               |                    | Chief Executive Officer            | November 2, 2007 |   |
|--------------------------------------|-------------------------|------------------------------------|------------------|--------|
|    Stanislas Vilgrain |                    |                               |
|                                 |                    |                               |
|                                 |                    |                               |
|                                 |                    |                               |
| /s/ Ronald Zilkowski                 |                    | Chief Financial Officer, Treasurer | November 2, 2007 |   |
|    Ronald Zilkowski   | and Corporate Secretary |                               |
|                                      |                         |                                    |                  |        |  |

 

----
Editorial Note on Part 416
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 416 appear at 68 FR 53509, Sept. 11, 2003.

§ 416.1324 Suspension due to excess resources. ( a ) *Effective date.* Except as specified in §§ 416.1240 through 416.1242, suspension of benefit payments because of excess resources is required effective with the month in which: ( 1 ) Ineligibility exists because countable resources are in excess of: ( i ) The resource limits prescribed in § 416.1205 for an individual and an individual and spouse, or
( ii ) In the case of an eligible individual (and eligible spouse, if any) who for the month of December 1973 was a recipient of aid or assistance under a State plan approved under title I, X, XIV, or XVI of the Act, the maximum amount of resources specified in such State plan as in effect for October 1972, if greater than the amounts specified in § 416.1205, as applicable; or
( 2 ) After eligibility has been established, payment of benefits was conditioned upon disposal of specified resources, which exceeded the permitted amount and the claimant did not comply with the agreed upon conditions.
( 3 ) The amount of an individual's or couple's countable resources is determined as of the first moment of each calendar quarter.
( b ) *Resumption of payments.* If benefits are otherwise payable, they will be resumed effective with the start of the month after the month in which a recipient's countable resources no longer exceed the limit that applies. If the reason that a recipient's benefits were suspended was excess resources, the payment for the first month that benefits are reinstated will not be prorated under § 416.421.
[40 FR 1510, Jan. 8, 1975, as amended at 50 FR 38982, Sept. 26, 1985; 51 FR 13494, Apr. 21, 1986]
Editorial Note on Part 601
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 601 appear at 71 FR 35512, June 21, 2006.

§ 601.2 Approval of State unemployment compensation laws. States may at their option submit their unemployment compensation laws for approval (section 3304(a) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986). ( a ) *Submission.* The States submit to the Employment and Training Administration (ETA), one copy of the State unemployment compensation law properly certified by an authorized State official to be true and complete, together with a written request for approval.
( b ) [Reserved]
( c ) *Approval.* The Secretary of Labor determines whether the State law contains the provisions required by section 3304(a) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986. If the State law is approved, the Secretary notifies the Governor of the State within 30 days of the submission of such law.
( d ) *Certification.* On October 31 of each taxable year the Secretary of Labor certifies, for the purposes of normal tax credit (section 3302(a)(1) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986), to the Secretary of the Treasury each State the law of which the Secretary has previously approved. (See also § 601.5.)
(Approved by the Office of Management and Budget under control number 1205-0222) [15 FR 5886, Aug. 31, 1950; 23 FR 1267, Mar. 1, 1958, as amended at 49 FR 18295, Apr. 30, 1984; 50 FR 51241, Dec. 16, 1985; 71 FR 35513, June 21, 2006]
Independent
      Accountants' Report














To
      the
      Board of Directors


CWCapital
      Asset Management LLC











We
      have
      examined management's assertion about CWCapital Asset Management LLC's
      compliance with the minimum servicing standards identified in the Mortgage
      Bankers Association of America's Uniform
      Single Attestation Program for Mortgage Bankers (USAP)
      as of December 31, 2005 and for the period from July 14, 2005 through December
      31, 2005 included in the accompanying management assertion. Management is
      responsible for CWCapital Asset Management LLC's compliance with those
      applicable minimum servicing standards. Our responsibility is to express an
      opinion on management's assertion about the entity's compliance based on our
      examination.





Our
      examination was made in accordance with standards established by the American
      Institute of Certified Public Accountants and, accordingly, included examining,
      on a test basis, evidence about CWCapital Asset Management LLC's compliance
      with
      the applicable minimum servicing standards and performing such other procedures
      as we considered necessary in the circumstances. We believe that our examination
      provides a reasonable basis for our opinion. Our examination does not provide
      a
      legal determination on CWCapital Asset Management LLC's compliance with the
      applicable minimum servicing standards.





In
      our
      opinion, management's assertion that CWCapital Asset Management LLC, in its
      capacity as Special Servicer, complied with the aforementioned applicable
      minimum servicing standards as of December 31, 2005 and for the period from
      July
      14, 2005 through December 31, 2005 is fairly stated, in all material respects,
      as set forth in the criteria attached.








/s/MATTHEWS,
      CARTER AND BOYCE, P.C.











March
      10,
      2006






































11320
      Random Hills Road • Suite 600 • Fairfax, Virginia 22030-7427 • TEL: 703-218-3600
• FAX: 703-218-1808
###### Editorial Note on Part 416

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 416 appear at 68 FR 53509, Sept. 11, 2003.

#### § 416.1083 Hearings and appeals process.

The rules for hearings and appeals before the Board are provided in 45 CFR part 16. A notice under § 416.1080 of this subpart will be considered a “final written decision” for purposes of Board review.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from Century
Properties Fund XX 1998 Third Quarter 10-QSB and is qualified in its entirety by
reference to such 10-QSB filing.
</LEGEND>
<CIK> 0000736909
<NAME> CENTURY PROPERTIES FUND XX
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-30-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1998
<CASH>                                           9,081
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0<F1>
<PP&E>                                          50,267
<DEPRECIATION>                                  19,234
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  41,663
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0<F1>
<BONDS>                                         48,695
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                     (8,350)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    41,663
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 6,332
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 4,633
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               1,883
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                      0
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     (184)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (2.91)<F2>
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
<FN>
<F1>Registrant has an unclassified balance sheet.
<F2>Multiplier is 1.
</FN>
        

</TABLE>
# In the United States Court of Federal Claims

OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS

No. 15-1449V Filed: April 12, 2016

UNPUBLISHED

* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * RUTH MAJOR, *

* Petitioner, * Ruling on Entitlement; Concession; * Influenza (“Flu”) Vaccine; Shoulder * Injury Related to Vaccine Administration SECRETARY OF HEALTH * (“SIRVA ”); Special Processing Unit AND HUMAN SERVICES, * (“SPU”)

* Respondent. *

*

* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * Carol L. Gallagher, Linwood, NJ, attorney for petitioner. Ann Donohue Martin, U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, DC, for respondent.

RULING ON ENTITLEMENT 1

Dorsey , Chief Special Master:

On December 1, 2015, Ruth Major (“petit ioner”) filed a petition for compensation under the National Vaccine Injury Com pensation Program, 42 U.S.C. §300aa-10, et

seq.

, 2 (the “Vaccine Act”). Petitioner alleges that as a result of an influenza (“flu”) vaccine administered to her on January 4, 2015, she suffered a shoulder injury related to vaccine administration (“SIRVA”). Petition at 2. The case was assigned to the Special Processing Unit of the Office of Special Masters.

On April 8, 2016, respondent filed her Rule 4(c) report in which she concedes that petitioner is entitled to compensation in this case. Respondent’s Rule 4(c) Report

at 1. Specifically, respondent states that pet itioner’s “alleged injury is consistent with shoulder injury related to vaccine administr ation (“SIRVA”), and that it was caused in fact by the flu vaccine she received on January 4, 2015.” Id. at 2. Respondent further

1 Because this unpublished ruling contains a reaso ned explanation for the action in this case, the undersigned intends to post it on the United States Cour t of Federal Claims' website, in accordance with

the E-Government Act of 2002. 44 U.S.C. § 3501 note (2012)(Federal Management and Promotion of Electronic Government Services). In accordance with Vaccine Rule 18(b), petitioner has 14 days to identify and move to redact medical or other inform ation, the disclosure of which would constitute an unwarranted invasion of privacy. If, upon review, t he undersigned agrees that the identified material fits within this definition, the undersigned will redact such material from public access.

2 National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act of 1986, Pub. L. No. 99-660, 100 Stat. 3755. Hereinafter, for ease of citation, all “§” references to the Vaccine Ac t will be to the pertinent subparagraph of 42 U.S.C. § 300aa (2012).2 agrees that petitioner has met the stat utory requirements fo r entitlement to compensation. Id. at 3.

In view of respondent’s concession and the evidence before me, the undersigned finds that petitioner is entitled to compensation.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

s/Nora Beth Dorsey Nora Beth Dorsey Chief Special Master
Exhibit 5.1
 
 
  
 
   
  
  
  
  1.
    
    The Partnership has been duly formed and is validly existing as a limited
partnership under the Delaware LP Act.2.
    
    The Common Units have been duly authorized, validly issued and fully paid
and are nonassessable.
  1.
    
    We have assumed, without independent verification, that the certificates for the
Common Units will conform to the specimens thereof examined by us and will have been duly
countersigned by a transfer agent and duly registered by a registrar of the Common Units.2.
    
    We have assumed that (a) each document submitted to us for review is accurate and
complete, each such document that is an original is authentic, each such document that is
a copy conforms to an authentic original and all signatures on each such document are
genuine, and (b) each certificate from governmental officials reviewed by us is accurate,
complete and authentic, and all official public records are accurate and complete.3.
    
    This opinion is limited in all respects to U.S. federal laws,
as interpreted by federal courts, and all applicable Delaware statutory provisions, as well as the reported judicial decisions
interpreting such provisions.
  Very truly yours,/s/ VINSON & ELKINS L.L.P.

VINSON & ELKINS L.L.P.
 Vinson & Elkins LLP Attorneys at Law
Abu Dhabi Austin Beijing Dallas Dubai Hong Kong Houston London Moscow New York Palo Alto Riyadh Shanghai Tokyo Washington
    
    First City Tower, 1001 Fannin
Street, Suite 2500, Houston, TX
77002-6760 Tel713.758.2222 Fax
713.758.2346 www.velaw.com
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,  AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of ALCO, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ended June 30, 2006 (the "Report"), I, Andrew Liu, President and Chairman of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

> 1) The Report fully complies with the requirement of Section 13(a) or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange
> Act of 1934; and
> 
> 
> 2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the Company's
> financial position and results of operations.

/s/Andrew Liu



Andrew Liu, President and Chairman

August 14, 2006
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

DAY ELEV

 1,900.86

 1,901.00

 1,901.07

 1,901.17

 1,901.22

 1,901.23

 1,901.34

 1,901.41

 1,901.41

 1,901.40

 1,901.31

 1,901.23

 1,901.13

 1,901.01

 1,900.91

 1,900.83

 1,900.78

 1,901.69

 1,901.18

 1,901.16

 1,901.08

 1,901.36

 1,901.32

 1,901.16

 1,901.01

 1,901.11

 1,901.05

 1,901.09

 1,900.94

 1,900.80

 13,808

 13,911

 13,963

 14,038

 14,076

 14,083

 14,165

 14,218

 14,218

 14,210

 14,143

 14,083

 14,008

 13,918

 13,845

 13,786

 13,749

 14,427

 14,046

 14,031

 13,971

 14,180

 14,150

 14,031

 13,918

 13,993

 13,948

 13,978

 13,867

 13,764

STORAGE

-74

+103

+52

+75

+38

+7

+82

+53

+0

-8

-67

-60

-75

-90

-73

-59

-37

+678

-381

-15

-60

+209

-30

-119

-113

+75

-45

+30

-111

-103

CHANGE

312

416

388

401

387

368

409

397

373

366

336

338

331

321

325

314

322

675

141

320

288

413

339

292

295

387

326

365

279

296

INFLOW

 77

 80

 80

 80

 80

 80

 80

 80

 80

 80

 80

 80

 80

 80

 80

 80

 79

 80

 80

 21

 2

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

POWER

 213

 222

 220

 221

 226

 224

 225

 229

 230

 228

 226

 224

 225

 222

 223

 222

 226

 224

 219

 214

 209

 200

 216

 215

 215

 212

 212

 211

 203

 210

SPILL

 14

 15

 15

 15

 15

 15

 15

 15

 15

 15

 15

 15

 15

 15

 15

 15

 15

 15

 15

 74

 93

 91

 95

 95

 95

 95

 95

 95

 91

 95

OUTLETS

 1

 2

 1

 1

 2

 0

 2

 1

 1

 0

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 0

 1

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 1

 0

 0

C.F.S.

 .03

 .08

 .06

 .05

 .07

 .01

 .07

 .04

 .04

 .00

 .03

 .03

 .03

 .03

 .03

 .02

 .05

 .01

 .02

 .02

 .00

 .01

 .00

 .02

 .02

 .02

 .01

 .06

 .00

 .02

INCHES

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

NOVEMBER 2009 LEWISTON LAKE DAILY OPERATIONS RUN DATE: December 1, 2009

IN LAKE

EVAPORATION

C.F.S. FRANCIS CARR

COMPUTED*

ACRE-FEET

RELEASE - C.F.S. 

TOTALS -118 10,520 1,539 1,298 6,566 18 .88

ACRE-FEET -118 20,866 3,053 2,575 13,024 36

* COMPUTED INFLOW IS THE SUM OF CHANGE IN STORAGE, RELEASES AND EVAPORATION.

(1) OUTLET RELEASE INCLUDES THE CONTINUOUS FISH RELEASE OF 75 C.F.S.

(2) INCHES OF EVAPORATION TAKEN FROM PAN AT TRINITY RIVER HATCHERY

SUMMARY

RELEASE (ACRE-FEET)

TOTAL POWER 3,053

TOTAL RIVER 18,652 20,951

 13,882

 2,299

RIVER

JUDGE FRANCIS CARR POWERPLANT

TOTAL RELEASE

JUDGE (2)

(1) POWERPLANT

 44

 45

 46

 46

 45

 45

 46

 45

 47

 47

 48

 48

 48

 48

 43

 27

 20

 14

 19

 19

 14

 17

 43

 42

 42

 42

 42

 43

 41

 43

 1,159

 2,299
#### William A. Rees and Others v. United States Oxygen Company, Impleaded, etc.

Motion denied, with ten dollars costs. Present — Ingraham, P. J., Clarke, Scott, Dowling and Hotchkiss, JJ.