alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**EXHIBIT 31.1****WRITTEN STATEMENT OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**I, Stanislas Vilgrain, certify that:1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Cuisine Solutions, Inc.;2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement of a materialfact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of thecircumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this quarterly report;3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included inthis quarterly report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results ofoperations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterlyreport.4. The registrant’s other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls andprocedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating tothe registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others withinthose entities, particularly during the period in which this quarterly report is being prepared;b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures andpresented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls andprocedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; andc) disclosed in this quarterly report any change in the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter that hasmaterially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internalcontrol over financial reporting; and5. The registrant’s other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the auditcommittee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internalcontrols over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect theregistrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; andb) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have asignificant role in the registrant’s internal controls over financial reporting.Date:October 25, 2005   /s/ Stanislas Vilgrain     Stanislas Vilgrain  Chief Executive Officer  
28
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
 Washington, D.C. 20549
 FORM 8-K
 CURRENT REPORT
Pursuant to Section 13 OR 15(d) of The Securities Exchange Act of 1934
 Date of Report (Date of earliest event reported): July 25, 2011
 Advanced Energy Industries, Inc.
  Delaware

000-26966

84-0846841(State or other jurisdiction
of incorporation)

(Commission File Number)

(IRS Employer Identification No.)
 1625 Sharp Point Drive, 
Fort Collins, Colorado

80525(Address of principal executive offices)

(Zip Code)
 (970) 221-4670
 
 (Former name or former address, if changed since last report.)
  o

Written communications pursuant to Rule 425 under the Securities Act (17 CFR 230.425)o

Soliciting material pursuant to Rule 14a-12 under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.14a-12)o

Pre-commencement communications pursuant to Rule 14d-2(b) under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.14d-2(b))o

Pre-commencement communications pursuant to Rule 13e-4(c) under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.13e-4(c))




---



##### 



Item 2.02 Results of Operations and Financial Condition.
 The information in this Form 8-K that is furnished under Item 2.02 Results of Operations and
Financial Condition and Exhibit 99.1 attached hereto shall not be deemed filed for purposes of
Section 18 of the Securities Act of 1934, nor shall they be deemed incorporated by reference in any
filing under the Securities Act of 1933, except as shall be expressly set forth by specific
reference in such filing.
  Item 9.01
    
    Financial Statements and Exhibits.
  99.1
    
    
    Press release dated July 25, 2011
by Advanced Energy Industries,
Inc., reporting its financial
results for the quarter ended June
30, 2011.




---



##### 



SIGNATURES
  Advanced Energy Industries, Inc.Date: July 26, 2011
    /s/ Danny C. HerronDanny C. HerronExecutive Vice President & Chief Financial Officer




---



##### 



EXHIBIT INDEX
 Exhibit No.

    
    Description99.1
    
    
    Press release dated July 25, 2011 by Advanced Energy
Industries, Inc., reporting its financial results for the
quarter ended June 30, 2011.
Exhibit32.1

CERTIFICATION OF THE CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICERPURSUANTTO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

Inconnection with the Form 10-K of James River Group, Inc. for the yearended December  31, 2005, I,  J.  Adam Abram,President and Chief Executive Officer of James River Group, Inc.,hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuantto Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to myknowledge:

|           |                                                                                                                                                                  |
|-----------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| (a)  | such Form 10-K for the yearended December  31,  2005 fully complies with therequirements of section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934,as amended; and |

|           |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                  |
|-----------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| (b)  | the information containedin such Form 10-K for the year ended December  31,  2005fairly presents, in all material respects, the consolidated financialcondition and results of operations of James River Group, Inc. and itssubsidiaries as of, and for, the periods presented in such Form10-K. |

By:  /s/ J. AdamAbram                    Date:  March 23,2006       J. AdamAbram       President and Chief ExecutiveOfficer

----
Exhibit 31

           CERTIFICATION TO BE PROVIDED BY THE SERVICER WITH FORM 10-K

                                  Certification

            I, Kevin Cloyd, certify that:

            1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K, and all reports
on Form 8-K containing distribution or servicing reports filed in respect of
periods included in the year covered by this annual report, of Carrington
Mortgage Loan Trust, Series 2005-NC2, Asset Backed Pass-Through Certificates;

            2. Based on my knowledge, the information in these reports, taken as
a whole, does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to
state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the
circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading as of the
last day of the period covered by this annual report;

            3. Based on my knowledge, the distribution or servicing information
required to be provided to the trustee by the servicer under the pooling and
servicing, or similar, agreement, for inclusion in these reports is included in
these reports;

            4. Based on my knowledge and upon the annual compliance statement
included in the report and required to be delivered to the trustee in accordance
with the terms of the pooling and servicing, or similar, agreement, and except
as disclosed in the reports, the servicer has fulfilled its obligations under
the servicing agreement; and

            5. The reports disclose all significant deficiencies relating to the
servicer's compliance with the minimum servicing standards based upon the report
provided by an independent public accountant, after conducting a review in
compliance with the Uniform Single Attestation Program for Mortgage Bankers or
similar procedure, as set forth in the pooling and servicing, or similar,
agreement, that is included in these reports.

            In giving the certifications above, I have reasonably relied on
information provided to me by the following unaffiliated parties: Deutsche Bank
National Trust Company.


                                        NEW CENTURY MORTGAGE CORPORATION


                                        By: /s/ Kevin Cloyd
                                            ------------------------------------
                                        Name: Kevin Cloyd
                                        Title: Executive Vice President
                                        Date: 3/29/06
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY HIGH

 30,059

 29,551

 32,127

 30,825

 29,932

 29,001

 27,458

 27,439

 27,272

 27,522

 28,284

 28,536

 29,460

 30,077

 31,060

 31,667

 31,406

 31,194

 26,644

 30,234

 29,788

 29,935

 29,248

 28,500

 29,023

 29,255

 29,714

 30,253

 29,905

 29,466

 29,589

 20,596

 20,063

 19,730

 20,528

 19,943

 19,768

 19,355

 19,126

 19,462

 19,836

 20,494

 19,767

 19,967

 19,980

 20,925

 20,708

 21,393

 20,629

 19,997

 18,562

 18,457

 19,481

 20,580

 20,544

 20,705

 20,162

 19,144

 18,790

 19,110

 18,670

 18,162

 25,000

 24,445

 25,345

 26,055

 25,164

 24,035

 23,631

 23,466

 23,764

 24,042

 24,114

 24,141

 24,763

 25,143

 25,794

 26,104

 26,155

 26,010

 24,242

 24,834

 24,952

 24,956

 25,050

 24,571

 24,798

 24,390

 24,525

 24,642

 24,499

 24,146

 24,026

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

OCTOBER 2015 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: November 2, 2015

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

PORT CHICAGO BOTTOM IN SUISUN BAY
### §273. Pan American Institute of Geography and History; authorization of annual appropriations for membership

In order to meet the obligations of the United States as a member of the Pan American Institute of Geography and History, there are authorized to be appropriated to the Department of State—

(1) such sums as may be required for the payment by the United States of its share of the expenses of the Institute, as apportioned in accordance with the statutes of the Institute;

(2) such additional sums as may be needed annually for the payment of all necessary expenses incident to participation by the United States in the activities of the Institute; and

(3) the sum of $386,050 for payment by the United States of its assessed annual contributions for the period beginning July 1, 1964, and extending through the fiscal year expiring June 30, 1969.

(Aug. 2, 1935, ch. 430, §1, 49 Stat. 512; Aug. 31, 1954, ch. 1154, 68 Stat. 1008; Pub. L. 89–646, Oct. 13, 1966, 80 Stat. 893; Pub. L. 91–340, July 17, 1970, 84 Stat. 438; Pub. L. 97–241, title I, §113, Aug. 24, 1982, 96 Stat. 278.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

1982—Par. (1). Pub. L. 97–241 struck out ", not to exceed $200,000 annually," after "such sums".

1970—Pub. L. 91–340 increased annual appropriation authorization in par. (1) from $90,300 to $200,000, and added par. (3).

1966—Pub. L. 89–646 redesignated as cl. (1) provisions of former cl. (b), increasing the annual appropriation authorization from $50,000 to $90,300 and substituted cl. (2) additional annual appropriation authorization for payment of necessary expenses incident to participation by the United States in Institute activities for former cl. (a) appropriation authorization of $98,775 for payment by the United States of its assessed annual contributions for period beginning July 1, 1951, and extending through fiscal year expiring June 30, 1954.

1954—Act Aug. 31, 1954, appropriated sufficient funds to pay back assessments for years 1951 to 1954, and increased from $10,000 to $50,000 the authorized annual contribution.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Annual Appropriations

Annual appropriations to meet the obligations of membership in various international organizations were contained in acts listed in a note set out under section 269a of this title.
EXHIBIT 32.1




CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER


PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350





AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of First Keystone Corporation (the “Corporation”) for the period ended March 31, 2011, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “Report”), I, Matthew P. Prosseda, Chief Executive Officer, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as added by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:





1.
The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





2.
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Corporation as of and for the period covered by the Report.





/s/ Matthew P. ProssedaMatthew P. ProssedaChief Executive Officer





May 10, 2011
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY HIGH

 390

 392

 420

 369

 412

 399

 537

 543

 522

 416

 370

 345

 347

 292

 343

 307

 377

 390

 408

 399

 322

 314

 339

 310

 258

 249

 193

 224

 250

 232

 215

 173

 204

 181

 170

 153

 158

 167

 165

 173

 174

 178

 184

 165

 170

 151

 141

 136

 147

 133

 148

 143

 136

 142

 126

 119

 118

 93

 98

 104

 110

 107

 292

 292

 281

 268

 269

 281

 305

 303

 291

 287

 276

 270

 259

 242

 235

 229

 231

 239

 240

 249

 232

 232

 226

 209

 194

 182

 162

 162

 159

 161

 151

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

AUGUST 2014 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: September 2, 2014

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

SAN ANDREAS ON THE SAN JOAQUIN RIVER
Exhibit 32.2 

**Certification Pursuantto 18 U.S.C. 1350, As Adopted Pursuant toSection 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**

        Inconnection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended August 31, 2003 (the“Report”) of Immucor, Inc. (the “Registrant”), as filed with theSecurities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, I certify, to the best of myknowledge, that: 

    (1)                 The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the          Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and 

    (2)                 The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material          respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant. 

April 20, 2004 

/s/Steven C. Ramsey

StevenC. Ramsey
January 13 , 20 11

U.S. Department of Transportation Docket Operations West Building

– ground floor
Room W12

- 140 1200 New Jersey Ave., SE Washington, DC 20590

Dear Sirs:

Reference: FAA Exemption No. 4941, Regulatory Docket No. FAA

- 2002

- 11402

EAA (Experimental Aircraft Association) is the world leader in recreational aviation. With an international membership of 170,000 people in more than 112 nations, EAA brings together aviation enthusiasts, pilots and aircraft owners who are dedicated to the c ontinued growth of aviation, the preservation of its history and a commitment to aviation’s future. EAA programs, activities and events are known throughout the world for Preserving the heritage of aviation, Promoting access to flight, Protecting the righ t to fly, Preparing the future of aviation, and of our

Passion for aviation safety and education.

The conditions and reasons regarding public interest and safety, presented in the original petition dated June 7, 1988 and renewed through Exemptions 4941 th rough 4941 J , remain unchanged.

EAA requests FAA Exemption No. 4941 be renewed for a 3

- year period.

The specific vintage aircraft covered under this exemption, e.g., the B

- 17, B

- 25, B

- 26, C

- 47, C

54, Consolidated PBY, Martin PBM, Grumman S

- 2

- F, Curtis C

- 46 and the Ford Tri

- Motor, cover a very important chapter in American aviation history. The nationwide shortage of qualified FAA inspectors qualified and current in these aircraft still exists, so there is still a critical need for this petition.

EAA requests the FAA make one administrative correction to the renewed exemption. EAA requested the exemption cover the Martin PBM on e v ery petition requ est and e xempt ions No.
4941A

– 4941I contained the Martin PBM as an exempted aircraft. For some reason, the Martin PBM was not listed on exemption 4941J. EAA requests the FAA i nclude the Martin PBM on the renewed exemption.

The Experimental Aircraft Association, Inc. (EAA) is a non

- stock Wisconsin corporation, which has been granted 501 (c) (3) status by the Internal Revenue Service.

For que stions concerning this renewal, contact the undersigned at 920

- 426

- 6 103

.
Sincerely,

Randy Hansen Government Programs Director

P.O. BOX 3086 OSHKOS H, WI 54903

- 3086 • T el 920.426. 4800 • F ax 920.426.6560 • WWW.EAA.ORG
#### Hyman J. Pivovarsky, Appellant, v. Evelyn Pivovarsky, Respondent.

Settle order on notice. Present — Martin, P. J., Townley, Dore, Cohn and Callahan, JJ.
(No. 74-CC-550

#### Amlings Flowerland, Claimant, *vs.*State of Illinois, Department of Transportation, Respondent.

*Opinion filed May 13, 1974.*

Amlings Flowerland, Claimant, pro se.

William J. Scott, Attorney General; Saul R. Wexler, Assistant Attorney General, for Respondent.

Per Curiam.
If this opinion indicates that it is “FOR PUBLICATION,” it is subject to 

revision until final publication in the Michigan Appeals Reports.

*Former Court of Appeals judge, sitting on the Court of Appeals by assignment.

-1-

S T A T E O F M I C H I G A N

C O U R T O F A P P E A L S

JON SNYDER, Personal Representative of the

ESTATE OF CHRISTINA CAROLINE SNYDER,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

UNPUBLISHED

August 22, 2024

v No. 367210

Washtenaw Circuit Court

CHARLES EDWARD HORN, LINDA LORRAINE

HORN, and STATE FARM MUTUAL 

AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE COMPANY,

LC No. 19-000769-NI

Defendants,

and

CITY OF YPSILANTI,

 Defendant-Appellant.

Before: O’BRIEN, P.J., and CAVANAGH and SHAPIRO*, JJ.

SHAPIRO, J. (dissenting).

I respectfully dissent. In my view, this case is controlled by Martin v Rapid Inter-Urban 

Transit Partnership, 480 Mich 936; 740 NW2d 657 (2007), a case the majority fails to address 

and which either implicitly overruled or sharply limited the effect of Chandler v County of 

Muskegon, 467 Mich 315; 652 NW2d 224 (2002) and Poppen v Tovey, 256 Mich App 351; 664 

NW2d 269 (2003), the two cases relied on by the majority.

In Martin, the plaintiff claimed that she was injured when she slipped and fell on bus steps 

while exiting and alleged that the failure to remove ice and snow from the steps constituted 

negligent operation. The trial court denied summary disposition but this Court reversed relying 

on Chandler and holding that the failure to clear the steps was a failure of maintenance and did 

not constitute negligent operation. The Supreme Court reversed our decision and reinstated the 

case. It held that even though the bus in question was stationary, “[t]he loading and unloading of 
-2-

passengers is an action within the ’operation‘ of a shuttle bus.” Id. In other words, whether or not 

the vehicle was being driven at the moment of injury was not controlling. Indeed, the condition 

of the steps would seem to have no connection to driving the bus or interaction with other motor 

vehicles on the road. Rather, the issue was whether the use of the vehicle was “an action within 

the operation of” a shuttle bus. See also, Strozier v Flint Community Schools, 295 Mich App 82; 

811 NW2d 59 (2011).

In this case, the defendant’s fire engine was blocking the right lane on I-94, a major 

highway with vehicles operating at 70 mph. The fire truck did not just happen to be “parked” there 

nor had it ceased operation. Rather, it was engaged in an activity well within its scope of operation 

– attending to accident victims and placing the vehicle in a manner intended to shield the accident 

scene from oncoming traffic.

I would therefore affirm the trial court’s denial of summary disposition and remand for 

further proceedings.1

/s/ Douglas B. Shapiro

 

1 The second issue, whether there was a question of fact regarding negligence was not reached by 

the majority. As to that issue, I would hold that the evidence presented by the plaintiff, including 

the testimony of its expert that the firetruck should have been on the shoulder and not in a travel 

lane, established a question of fact.
# Fourth Court of Appeals San Antonio, Texas January 24, 2018
No. 04

- 17

- 00769

- CV IN THE INTEREST OF L.M.T., ET AL., CHILDREN , From the 45th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2016

- PA

- 00862 Honorable Norma Gonzales, Judge Presiding



### O R D E R This is an accelerated appeal of the trial court’s order terminating both parents’ parental rights. The appellants ’ brief s wer e originally due to be filed on January 2, 2018

. By order dated January 3 , 2018 , the first motion for extension of time filed by appellant D.P . (the mother ) was granted , extending the deadline to file the brief to January 22, 2018

. Because t he disposition of this appeal is governed by the standards set forth in Rule 6.2 of the Texas R ules of Judicial Administration our order noted this appeal is required to be brought to final disposition within 180 days of the date the notice of appeal is file d

. T EX

. R. J UD

. A DMIN

. 6.2. Our order further stated, “ Given the time constraints governing the disposition of this appeal, further requests for extensions of time will be disfavored. ” On January 22, 201 8 , appellant’s attorney filed a second motion for extension of time requesting an additional twenty

- day extension due to the attorney’s worklo ad. The motion is GRANTED. THIS IS THE FINAL EXTENSION OF TIME THAT APPELLANT D.P. WILL BE GRANTED . Appellant D.P.’s brief must be filed no later than February 12, 2018

.

_____ ____________________________ Sandee Bryan Marion, Chief Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said court on this 24th day of January, 20 18

.

___________________________________ KEITH E. HOTTLE , Clerk of Court