alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 78 (Friday, April 22, 2011)]
[Notices]
[Pages 22695-22696]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2011-9809]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket No. ER11-3370-000]


Phalanx Energy Services, LLC; Supplemental Notice That Initial 
Market-Based Rate Filing Includes Request for Blanket Section 204 
Authorization

    This is a supplemental notice in the above-referenced proceeding of 
Phalanx Energy Services, LLC's application for market-based rate 
authority, with an accompanying rate tariff, noting that such 
application includes a request for blanket authorization, under 18 CFR

[[Page 22696]]

part 34, of future issuances of securities and assumptions of 
liability.
    Any person desiring to intervene or to protest should file with the 
Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE., 
Washington, DC 20426, in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the 
Commission's Rules of Practice and Procedure (18 CFR 385.211 and 
385.214). Anyone filing a motion to intervene or protest must serve a 
copy of that document on the Applicant.
    Notice is hereby given that the deadline for filing protests with 
regard to the applicant's request for blanket authorization, under 18 
CFR part 34, of future issuances of securities and assumptions of 
liability, is May 9, 2011.
    The Commission encourages electronic submission of protests and 
interventions in lieu of paper, using the FERC Online links at http://www.ferc.gov. To facilitate electronic service, persons with Internet 
access who will eFile a document and/or be listed as a contact for an 
intervenor must create and validate an eRegistration account using the 
eRegistration link. Select the eFiling link to log on and submit the 
intervention or protests.
    Persons unable to file electronically should submit an original and 
14 copies of the intervention or protest to the Federal Energy 
Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE., Washington, DC 20426.
    The filings in the above-referenced proceeding are accessible in 
the Commission's eLibrary system by clicking on the appropriate link in 
the above list. They are also available for review in the Commission's 
Public Reference Room in Washington, DC. There is an eSubscription link 
on the Web site that enables subscribers to receive e-mail notification 
when a document is added to a subscribed docket(s). For assistance with 
any FERC Online service, please e-mail <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#a3e5e6f1e0eccdcfcacdc6f0d6d3d3ccd1d7e3c5c6d1c08dc4ccd5"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="490f0c1b0a06272520272c1a3c3939263b3d092f2c3b2a672e263f">[email protected]</span></a> or 
call (866) 208-3676 (toll free). For TTY, call (202) 502-8659.

    Dated: April 18, 2011.
Nathaniel J. Davis, Sr.,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2011-9809 Filed 4-21-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
# C_2012369EN.01000401.xml

| 29.11.2012 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 369/4 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

29.11.2012

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 369/4

---

Authorisation for State aid pursuant to Articles 107 and 108 of the TFEU

Cases where the Commission raises no objections

(Text with EEA relevance)

2012/C 369/02

| Date of adoption of the decision | 6.10.2011 |
| --- | --- |
| Reference number of State Aid | SA.31192 (N 289/10) |
| Member State | France |
| Region | France | Non-assisted areas |
| Title (and/or name of the beneficiary) | Aide en faveur des entreprises d’élevage piscicole pour l’enlèvement et l’élimination des animaux trouvés morts |
| Legal basis | — | Articles L. 226-1 à L. 226-8, R. 226-1 à R. 226-3, R. 226-5 à R. 226-8, R. 226-11 à R. 226-13 et R. 228-12 à R. 228-14 du Code rural et de la pêche maritime |

Date of adoption of the decision

6.10.2011

Reference number of State Aid

SA.31192 (N 289/10)

Member State

France

Region

France

Non-assisted areas

Title (and/or name of the beneficiary)

Aide en faveur des entreprises d’élevage piscicole pour l’enlèvement et l’élimination des animaux trouvés morts

Legal basis

—

Articles L. 226-1 à L. 226-8, R. 226-1 à R. 226-3, R. 226-5 à R. 226-8, R. 226-11 à R. 226-13 et R. 228-12 à R. 228-14 du Code rural et de la pêche maritime

| — | Décret no 2005-1220 du 28 septembre 2005, pris pour l’application de l’article L. 226-1 du code rural, modifié par le décret no 2009-872 du 16 juillet 2009 |
| --- | --- |

—

Décret no 2005-1220 du 28 septembre 2005, pris pour l’application de l’article L. 226-1 du code rural, modifié par le décret no 2009-872 du 16 juillet 2009

o

o

| — | Projet de circulaire DPMA/SDAEP/C2010 |
| --- | --- |

—

Projet de circulaire DPMA/SDAEP/C2010

Type of measure

Scheme

—

Objective

Sectoral development

Form of aid

Direct grant

Budget

| | Overall budget: EUR 1,40 million |
| --- | --- |

Overall budget: EUR 1,40 million

| | Annual budget: EUR 1,40 million |
| --- | --- |

Annual budget: EUR 1,40 million

Intensity

40 %

Duration (period)

3.9.2010-31.12.2013

Economic sectors

All economic sectors eligible to receive aid

Name and address of the granting authority

| Ministère de l'alimentation, de l'agriculture et de la pêche |
| --- |
| 3 place de Fontenoy |
| 75007 Paris |
| FRANCE |

Ministère de l'alimentation, de l'agriculture et de la pêche

3 place de Fontenoy

75007 Paris

FRANCE

Other information

—

The authentic text(s) of the decision, from which all confidential information has been removed, can be found at:

http://ec.europa.eu/competition/elojade/isef/index.cfm

---
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY HIGH

 378

 520

 595

 687

 642

 649

 590

 559

 570

 582

 558

 569

 512

 525

 647

 755

 763

 660

 790

 818

 802

 801

 720

 665

 631

 527

 626

 820

 752

 731

 814

 143

 146

 152

 149

 149

 150

 146

 162

 149

 153

 153

 164

 168

 162

 161

 171

 165

 156

 168

 169

 164

 160

 177

 188

 188

 189

 186

 197

 217

 193

 200

 231

 261

 333

 310

 311

 298

 302

 302

 300

 320

 312

 314

 316

 309

 321

 347

 370

 318

 376

 380

 361

 362

 347

 333

 322

 315

 337

 408

 447

 397

 406

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

AUGUST 2002 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: September 9, 2002

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

SAN ANDREAS ON THE SAN JOAQUIN RIVER
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY HIGH

 328

 313

 305

 781

 1,289

 1,301

 1,045

 1,168

 1,575

 1,894

 2,167

 2,683

 3,746

 3,195

 2,771

 1,424

 1,277

 1,175

 1,452

 1,198

 1,210

 1,421

 1,983

 2,651

 3,136

 3,035

 2,685

 3,597

 5,443

 5,085

 3,884

 290

 285

 276

 279

 278

 284

 291

 312

 322

 354

 363

 396

 428

 437

 433

 392

 380

 406

 411

 425

 399

 402

 425

 438

 460

 505

 501

 519

 477

 477

 439

 313

 298

 288

 343

 409

 427

 432

 521

 595

 671

 718

 843

 1,034

 1,002

 963

 680

 594

 591

 661

 648

 589

 647

 744

 897

 1,007

 1,038

 1,028

 1,249

 1,748

 1,871

 1,562

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

MARCH 2008 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: April 8, 2008

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

PITTSBURG BOTTOM ON THE SACRAMENTO RIVER
Editorial Note on Part 416
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 416 appear at 68 FR 53509, Sept. 11, 2003.

§ 416.919o When a properly signed consultative examination report has not been received. If a consultative examination report is received unsigned or improperly signed we will take the following action. ( a ) *When we will make determinations and decisions without a properly signed report.* We will make a determination or decision in the circumstances specified in paragraphs (a)(1) and (a)(2) of this section without waiting for a properly signed consultative examination report. After we have made the determination or decision, we will obtain a properly signed report and include it in the file unless the medical source who performed the original consultative examination has died: ( 1 ) Continuous period of disability allowance with an onset date as alleged or earlier than alleged; or
( 2 ) Continuance of disability.
( b ) *When we will not make determinations and decisions without a properly signed report.* We will not use an unsigned or improperly signed consultative examination report to make the determinations or decisions specified in paragraphs (b)(1), (b)(2), (b)(3), and (b)(4) of this section. When we need a properly signed consultative examination report to make these determinations or decisions, we must obtain such a report. If the signature of the medical source who performed the original examination cannot be obtained because the medical source is out of the country for an extended period of time, or on an extended vacation, seriously ill, deceased, or for any other reason, the consultative examination will be rescheduled with another medical source: ( 1 ) Denial; or
( 2 ) Cessation; or
( 3 ) Allowance of disability which has ended; or
( 4 ) Allowance with an onset date later than the filing date.
[56 FR 36967, Aug. 1, 1991, as amended at 65 FR 11880, Mar. 7, 2000]
### T E X A S C O U R T O F A P P E A L S , T H I R D D I S T R I C T , A T A U S T I N

NO. 03-13-00706- CR

Bruce Vince nt F elder, Appellant

v. The State of Texas, App ellee

F ROM TH E DISTRI CT COURT O F H AY S CO UNTY, 22ND J UDICIAL DI STRICT NO. CR-12 -07 39, TH E H ONO RAB LE WI LLIAM R. H ENRY, JUDGE P RESIDING

M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N Appellant Br

uce Vincent Fe l d er wa s convicted by a jury of criminal trespass of a habitation. See Tex. Penal Code § 3 0 .05. The trial court assessed appellant’ s punishment at

1 confine ment in the county jail for one y ear , but suspended imposit ion of the sentenc e an d place d appellant on c ommunity

supervision for two y ear s. See Tex. Code Crim. P roc. a rt. 42.12, § 3. Appellant’s court-a

ppointed attorney has filed a motion to withdraw supported by a brief concludi n g that the appea l in this case is frivolous and without merit. The brief meets the require ments of Anders v. Calif ornia by pres en t i n g a profe ssional evalua tion of the rec ord demonstrat i n g wh y t here are no arg uable g rounds to be advanc ed. See Anders v. Calif ornia ,

Appellant was char g ed by indictment with the felony offe nse of burg lary of a habi t ation 1 wi t h i ntent to commit assault. See Tex. Penal Code § 30.02(a) (1). Howeve r, the jury foun d appellant g uilty

of the lesse r-include d offe nse of c riminal trespass of a habitation.386 U.S. 738, 744 (1967); Garner v. State , 300 S.W .3d 763, 766 (Tex. Crim. App. 2009); see also

Penson v. O hio , 488 U.S. 75, 81–82 (1988).

Ap p ell ant’s counsel has repr esente d to this Court that he provided copies of t h e motion and brief to appellant along with a letter advising appellant of his rig ht to examine the appellate rec ord and f

ile a pro se brief. See Anders , 386 U.S. a t 744; Garner , 300 S.W .3d at 766. No pro se br ief or othe r written r esponse ha s been f iled. We have conducte d an independe nt revie w of the rec o rd , i n cluding appellate counsel’s brief and the trial proce eding , and find no reve rsible err or. See Anders , 386 U.S. at 744; Garner , 300 S.W .3d at 766; Bledsoe v. State , 178 S.W .3d 824, 826–27 (Tex. Crim. App. 2005). We agr ee with counsel that the rec ord prese nts no arg uably meritorious g rounds for revie w and t h e appea l is frivolous. Cou n s el ’s motion to withdraw is g rante d. The judgme nt of conviction is affirme d.

__________________________________________ J . Woodfin J ones, Chief Just ice Be fore Chief J ustice Jones, J ustices Rose and Goodw in Affir med Filed: Oc tober 8, 2014 Do Not Publish

2
(No. 6988

#### Kankakee Industrial Supply Company, Inc., Claimant, *vs.*State of Illinois, Respondent.

*Opinion filed December 17, 1973.*

Kankakee Industrial Supply Company, Inc., Claimant, pro se.

William J. Scott, Attorney General; William E. Webber, Assistant Attorney General, for Respondent.

Per Curiam.

This cause coming on to be heard on the Joint Stipulation of the parties hereto and the Court being fully advised in the premises;

This Court Finds that the purpose of this expenditure by the Department of Mental Health is the reimbursement to the vendor in accordance with the contract between the vendor and the Department of Mental Health for five gallon returnable bleach drums that were not returned. In accordance with the contract the department is to pay a price of $9.00 to the vendor for each drum not returned. The claim was filed for an amount of $927.00, but an audit conducted by the claimant and Mr. Gerald C. Anderson, Business Administrator for the Kankakee State Hospital, has concluded that as of No*184vember 6, 1972, the date of the filing of this complaint, there were only 28 drums outstanding and not returned which would amount to $252 due and owing for drums on the date of the filing of the claim. It would appear from the audit that the supplying and return of drums is a continuing purpose and that it would be virtually impossible at any time to determine if the claimant had supplied drums that would never be returned. However, the inventory of the Kanakee State Hospital indicated that there were drums missing and that the number missing would not be greater than 81. However, this report of the inventory was a current figure as of October 2, 1973, and can not be relied upon by the claimant in their claim for nonreturned drums as of the date of filing the complaint in question.

In view of the fact that there are apparently drums missing which can not be returned and the number of drums missing which can not be returned as of the date of the filing of the complaint appears from the inventory to be 28, it is hereby ordered by this Court that the claimant be awarded the amount of $252 which is payment for 28 drums at $9 apiece.

It Is, Hereby Ordered that the sum of $252 (Two Hundred Fifty Two Dollars) be awarded claimant in full satisfaction of any and all claims presented to the State of Illinois under the above-captioned cause.
**Exhibit 23.2**

 

**CONSENT OF DEGOLYER AND MACNAUGHTON**

 

We hereby consentto the use of the name DeGolyer and MacNaughton, to references to DeGolyer andMacNaughton as independent petroleum engineers, and to the inclusion ofinformation taken from our “Appraisal Report as of December 31, 2007 onCertain Properties owned by Linn Energy, LLC” and “Appraisal Report as of December 31,2006 on Certain Properties owned by Linn Energy, LLC” in the sections “Businessand Properties - Oil and Gas Data - Proved Reserves”, “ManagementDiscussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operation -Risk Factors, Selected Financial Data, Summary Reserve and Operating Data”, “Notesto Consolidated Financial Statements - Use of Estimates”, and “SupplementalOil and Gas Data (Unaudited)” of the Linn Energy, LLC Annual Report on Form 10-K,in the registration statement on Form S-8 (File No. 333-131153) andthe registration statements (Nos. 333-146120, 333-148061, and 333-148134)on Form S-3.

 
|   | /s/ PAUL J. SZATKOWSKI, P.E. |
|--------|------------------------------|
|   | Name:                        | Paul J. Szatkowski,  P.E. |
|   | Title:                       | Senior Vice President |
|   |                         | DeGolyer and  MacNaughton |

 

Dallas, TexasFebruary 28, 2008

 

 

----
```

[Congressional Bills 114th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 4095 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

114th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 4095

 To amend the charter of the Gold Star Wives of America to remove the 
 restriction on the federally chartered corporation, and directors and 
   officers of the corporation, attempting to influence legislation.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           November 19, 2015

  Ms. Brownley of California introduced the following bill; which was 
               referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To amend the charter of the Gold Star Wives of America to remove the 
 restriction on the federally chartered corporation, and directors and 
   officers of the corporation, attempting to influence legislation.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. REVISION OF FEDERAL CHARTER RESTRICTIONS ON GOLD STAR WIVES 
              OF AMERICA.

    Section 80507 of title 36, United States Code, is amended--
            (1) by striking subsection (b); and
            (2) by redesignating subsections (c) and (d) as subsections 
        (b) and (c), respectively.
                                 <all>
```
###### Editorial Note on Part 416

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 416 appear at 68 FR 53509, Sept. 11, 2003.

#### § 416.1601 Definitions and terms used in this subpart.

*We* or *Us* means the Social Security Administration.

*You* or *Your* means the person who applies for or receives SSI benefits or the person for whom an application is filed.
Editorial Note on Part 416
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 416 appear at 68 FR 53509, Sept. 11, 2003.

§ 416.903 Who makes disability and blindness determinations. ( a ) *State agencies.* State agencies make disability and blindness determinations for the Commissioner for most persons living in the State. State agencies make these disability and blindness determinations under regulations containing performance standards and other administrative requirements relating to the disability and blindness determination function. States have the option of turning the function over to the Federal Government if they no longer want to make disability determinations. Also, the Commissioner may take the function away from any State which has substantially failed to make disability and blindness determinations in accordance with these regulations. Subpart J of this part contains the rules the States must follow in making disability and blindness determinations.
( b ) *Social Security Administration.* The Social Security Administration will make disability and blindness determinations for— ( 1 ) Any person living in a State which is not making for the Commissioner any disability and blindness determinations or which is not making those determinations for the class of claimants to which that person belongs; and
( 2 ) Any person living outside the United States.
( c ) *What determinations are authorized.* The Commissioner has authorized the State agencies and the Social Security Administration to make determinations about— ( 1 ) Whether you are disabled or blind;
( 2 ) The date your disability or blindness began; and
( 3 ) The date your disability or blindness stopped.
( d ) *Review of State agency determinations.* On review of a State agency determination or redetermination of disability or blindness we may find that— ( 1 ) You are, or are not, disabled or blind, regardless of what the State agency found;
( 2 ) Your disability or blindness began earlier or later than the date found by the State agency; and
( 3 ) Your disability or blindness stopped earlier or later than the date found by the State agency.
( e ) *Determinations for childhood impairments.* In making a determination under title XVI with respect to the disability of a child, we will make reasonable efforts to ensure that a qualified pediatrician or other individual who specializes in a field of medicine appropriate to the child's impairment(s) evaluates the case of the child.
[46 FR 29211, May 29, 1981, as amended at 52 FR 33927, Sept. 9, 1987; 58 FR 47577, Sept. 9, 1993; 62 FR 38454, July 18, 1997; 65 FR 34958, June 1, 2000; 71 FR 16458, Mar. 31, 2006; 72 FR 51178, Sept. 6, 2007; 82 FR 5874, Jan. 18, 2017]
§ 408.320 What evidence shows that a person has authority to sign an application for you? ( a ) A person who signs an application for you will be required to give us evidence of his or her authority to sign the application for you under the following rules: ( 1 ) If the person who signs is a court-appointed representative, he or she must give us a certificate issued by the court showing authority to act for you.
( 2 ) If the person who signs is not a court-appointed representative, he or she must give us a statement describing his or her relationship to you. The statement must also describe the extent to which the person is responsible for your care.
( 3 ) If the person who signs is the manager or principal officer of an institution which is responsible for your care, he or she must give us a statement indicating the person's position of responsibility at the institution.
( b ) We may, at any time, require additional evidence to establish the authority of a person to sign an application for you.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY ELEVATION

 252.49

 252.50

 252.40

 252.50

 252.48

 252.51

 252.51

 252.48

 252.50

 252.52

 252.50

 252.50

 252.45

 252.49

 252.51

 252.49

 252.51

 252.53

 252.56

 252.51

 252.50

 252.56

 252.60

 252.53

 252.56

 252.48

 252.50

 252.45

 252.49

 252.50

 252.49

 3,919

 3,924

 3,874

 3,924

 3,914

 3,928

 3,928

 3,914

 3,924

 3,933

 3,924

 3,924

 3,899

 3,919

 3,928

 3,919

 3,928

 3,938

 3,953

 3,928

 3,924

 3,953

 3,973

 3,938

 3,953

 3,914

 3,924

 3,899

 3,919

 3,924

 3,919

STORAGE

-5

+5

-50

+50

-10

+14

+0

-14

+10

+9

-9

+0

-25

+20

+9

-9

+9

+10

+15

-25

-4

+29

+20

-35

+15

-39

+10

-25

+20

+5

-5

CHANGE

 1,005

 1,023

 1,210

 856

 817

 988

 1,018

 1,031

 1,147

 1,180

 1,208

 1,123

 1,124

 1,060

 923

 941

 1,009

 1,041

 1,049

 998

 954

 930

 928

 877

 846

 805

 934

 866

 947

 1,084

 881

 13,950

 13,470

 14,670

 13,470

 14,310

 15,030

 15,150

 14,310

 13,710

 14,190

 14,190

 14,190

 15,870

 14,310

 14,190

 15,030

 15,270

 15,270

 15,030

 14,910

 15,270

 15,630

 13,270

 13,950

 14,321

 14,321

 14,310

 13,470

 13,470

 12,390

 12,750

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

JULY 2005 RED BLUFF DIVERSION RESERVOIR DAILY OPERATIONS RUN DATE: March 6, 2006

IN LAKE

CANAL

 ACRE-FEET

TOTALS -5 30,803 443,672

ACRE-FEET -5 61,098 880,023

SUMMARY

RELEASE (ACRE-FEET)

TOTAL 945,165

 3,924

RELEASE

RIVER

CORNING TO SACTO

CANAL

RELEASE C.F.S.

TEHAMA

COLUSA

 79

 95

 78

 50

 54

 50

 72

 81

 70

 70

 29

 46

 66

 70

 56

 78

 68

 59

 67

 77

 54

 85

 79

 67

 49

 61

 74

 92

 67

 58

 38

 2,039

 4,044

CORNING CANAL 4,044

TEHAMA-COLUSA CANAL 61,098

TO SACTO RIVER 880,023

Table 9