alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>

                                                                    Exhibit 21.1

             Subsidiaries of the Registrant, Mego Financial Corp.


<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                                        Jurisdiction of        Percent
    Name of Subsidiary                                                   Incorporation          Owned        Parent
    ------------------                                                   -------------          -----        ------
<S>                                                                     <C>                     <C>          <C>
Preferred Equities Corporation                                               Nevada                 100%      Mego
Brigantine Preferred Properties, Inc.                                        Nevada                 100%       PEC
The Brig, Inc.                                                             New Jersey                99%       BPP
Brigantine Inn Management, Inc.                                            New Jersey               100%       BPP
Calvada Springs Corporation                                                  Nevada                 100%       PEC
Central Nevada Realty Company                                                Nevada                 100%       PEC
Central Nevada Utilities Company                                             Nevada                 100%       PEC
Colorado Land and Grazing Corp.                                             Colorado                100%       PEC
First Corporation of Nevada                                                  Nevada                 100%       PEC
First National Equity Corp.                                                  Nevada                 100%       PEC
Overlook Food and Beverage Company                                          Colorado                100%       PEC
Preferred Colorado Land Co.                                                 Colorado                 80%       PEC
Preferred Equities Insurance Agency, Inc.                                    Nevada                 100%       PEC
Preferred Vacation Resorts, Inc.                                             Nevada                 100%       PEC
Resort Properties Advertising, Inc.                                          Nevada                 100%       PEC
RVS Marketing, Inc.                                                          Texas                  100%       PEC
Southern Colorado Properties, Inc.                                          Colorado                100%       PEC
Steamboat Suites, Inc.                                                      Colorado                100%       PEC
AB Preferred Holdings Inc.                                                  Florida                 100%       PEC
</TABLE>
# C_2016045EN.01018001.xml

| 5.2.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 45/180 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

5.2.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 45/180

---

P7_TA(2013)0177

Amendment of the EC-Ukraine Agreement on the facilitation of the issuance of visas ***

European Parliament legislative resolution of 18 April 2013 on the draft Council decision on the conclusion of the Agreement between the European Union and Ukraine amending the Agreement between the European Community and Ukraine on the facilitation of the issuance of visas (12282/2012 — C7-0200/2012 — 2012/0138(NLE))

(Consent)

(2016/C 045/35)

The European Parliament,

The European Parliament

| — | having regard to the draft Council decision (12282/2012), |
| --- | --- |

—

having regard to the draft Council decision (12282/2012),

| — | having regard to the Agreement between the European Union and Ukraine amending the Agreement between the European Community and Ukraine on the facilitation of the issuance of visas (11044/2012), |
| --- | --- |

—

having regard to the Agreement between the European Union and Ukraine amending the Agreement between the European Community and Ukraine on the facilitation of the issuance of visas (11044/2012),

| — | having regard to the request for consent submitted by the Council in accordance with Article 77(2), point (a) and Article 218(6), second subparagraph, point (a) of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (C7-0200/2012), |
| --- | --- |

—

having regard to the request for consent submitted by the Council in accordance with Article 77(2), point (a) and Article 218(6), second subparagraph, point (a) of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (C7-0200/2012),

| — | having regard to Rules 81 and 90(7) of its Rules of Procedure, |
| --- | --- |

—

having regard to Rules 81 and 90(7) of its Rules of Procedure,

| — | having regard to the recommendation of the Committee on Civil Liberties, Justice and Home Affairs and the opinion of the Committee on Foreign Affairs (A7-0059/2013); |
| --- | --- |

—

having regard to the recommendation of the Committee on Civil Liberties, Justice and Home Affairs and the opinion of the Committee on Foreign Affairs (A7-0059/2013);

| 1. | Consents to conclusion of the agreement; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Consents to conclusion of the agreement;

| 2. | Instructs its President to forward its position to the Council, the Commission and the governments and parliaments of the Member States and of Ukraine. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Instructs its President to forward its position to the Council, the Commission and the governments and parliaments of the Member States and of Ukraine.

---
### §2680a. Compensation for disability or death

Section 1651 of title 42 shall not apply with respect to such contracts as the Secretary of State may determine which are contracts with persons employed to perform work for the Department of State or the Foreign Service on an intermittent basis for not more than 90 days in a calendar year.

(Aug. 1, 1956, ch. 841, title I, §16, as added and renumbered title I, Pub. L. 97–241, title I, §122, title II, §202(a), Aug. 24, 1982, 96 Stat. 281, 282.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Prior Provisions

A prior section 2680a, acts Aug. 1, 1956, ch. 841, §16, as added Oct. 26, 1974, Pub. L. 93–475, §12, 88 Stat. 1442; amended Oct. 7, 1978, Pub. L. 95–426, title I, §117, 92 Stat. 969, related to authority and responsibility of chiefs of mission, prior to repeal by Pub. L. 96–465, title II, §2205(10), Oct. 17, 1980, 94 Stat. 2160. Repeal effective Feb. 15, 1981, except as otherwise provided, see section 2403 of Pub. L. 96–465, set out as an Effective Date note under section 3901 of this title. See section 3927 of this title.
#### Edward Fincham Rosenthal, as Administrator de Bonis Non, etc., Respondent, v. The International College of Languages, Appellant.

Judgment and orders affirmed, with costs. No opinion. Present — Ingraham, P. J., McLaughlin, Laughlin, Clarke and Scott, JJ.
**EXHIBIT 32.1**

 

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TORULE 13a-14(b) OF THE EXCHANGE ACT AND 18U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ENACTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THESARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

 

In connection with theQuarterly Report of Intrusion Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-QSBfor the three-month period ending March 31, 2005 as filed with theSecurities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, G.Ward Paxton, Chief Executive Officer of the Company certify, pursuant to 18U.S.C. Section 1350, as enacted pursuant to Section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

(1)                                                          The Report fully complies with therequirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2)                                                          The information contained in the Reportfairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and resultsof operations of the Company.

 

 
| May 12, 2005 | /s/ G. Ward Paxton      |   |
|-------------------|-------------------------|--------|
|              | G. Ward Paxton          |
|              | Chief Executive Officer |

 

----
From: "Higgins, Cortney" <Cortney_Higgins@omb.eop.gov> 

To: RobertJ Wayland/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA 

Date: 11/29/2011 07:46 PM 

Subject: FW: E.O. 12866 Meeting on EGU MACT Rule 

Hi Bob, 

Here are the handouts from this meeting. 

 

Regards, 

Cortney 

 

 

-----Original Appointment----- 

From: Echols, Mabel E. 

Subject: E.O. 12866 Meeting on EGU MACT Rule 

When: Tuesday, November 29, 2011 1:00 PM-1:30 PM (UTC-05:00) Eastern Time 

(US & Canada). 

Where: Room 10103 NEOB 

 

This meeting was requested by Susan Tierney, Analysis Group, Inc.
### §266b. Repealed. June 11, 1940, ch. 306, 54 Stat. 263

Section, Joint Res. Aug. 7, 1935, ch. 455, §2, 49 Stat. 540, related to termination of Authorizations for Participation in Work of Committee of International Technical Aerial Legal Experts.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

DAY ELEV

 1,003.00

 1,003.22

 1,003.47

 1,003.80

 1,004.07

 1,004.46

 1,004.84

 1,005.02

 1,005.47

 1,006.06

 1,006.51

 1,006.89

 1,007.03

 1,007.26

 1,007.45

 1,007.61

 1,007.73

 1,007.80

 1,007.84

 1,007.93

 1,007.99

 1,008.25

 1,008.50

 1,008.45

 1,008.41

 1,008.28

 1,008.13

 1,007.99

 1,007.80

 1,007.65

 2,894.3

 2,899.1

 2,904.7

 2,912.0

 2,918.0

 2,926.7

 2,935.1

 2,939.1

 2,949.2

 2,962.4

 2,972.5

 2,981.1

 2,984.2

 2,989.4

 2,993.7

 2,997.3

 3,000.1

 3,001.6

 3,002.5

 3,004.6

 3,005.9

 3,011.8

 3,017.5

 3,016.4

 3,015.5

 3,012.5

 3,009.1

 3,005.9

 3,001.6

 2,998.2

STORAGE

+13.7

+4.9

+5.5

+7.3

+6.0

+8.7

+8.5

+4.0

+10.1

+13.2

+10.1

+8.6

+3.2

+5.2

+4.3

+3.6

+2.7

+1.6

+0.9

+2.0

+1.4

+5.9

+5.7

-1.1

-0.9

-3.0

-3.4

-3.2

-4.3

-3.4

CHANGE

 11,265

 7,222

 7,794

 7,955

 7,361

 8,483

 8,451

 7,106

 10,537

 10,192

 9,234

 8,798

 7,463

 7,866

 7,024

 7,264

 7,574

 6,936

 6,809

 7,164

 7,036

 7,492

 8,253

 6,456

 6,442

 8,980

 5,835

 6,107

 5,421

 6,034

INFLOW

 4,380

 4,701

 4,938

 4,194

 4,193

 4,000

 4,048

 4,966

 5,415

 3,466

 3,984

 4,421

 5,773

 5,070

 4,725

 5,299

 6,013

 6,045

 6,093

 5,971

 6,119

 4,353

 5,078

 6,828

 6,833

 6,533

 7,434

 7,478

 7,500

 7,644

POWER

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

SPILL

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 8

 0

 0

 3,737

 0

 0

 0

 0

OUTLET

 0

 65

 65

 78

 150

 105

 138

 118

 46

 66

 146

 66

 100

 173

 133

 140

 193

 93

 260

 167

 233

 160

 301

 201

 67

 200

 120

 233

 87

 100

C.F.S.

 .00

 .10

 .10

 .12

 .23

 .16

 .21

 .18

 .07

 .10

 .22

 .10

 .15

 .26

 .20

 .21

 .29

 .14

 .39

 .25

 .35

 .24

 .45

 .30

 .10

 .30

 .18

 .35

 .13

 .15

INCHES

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .02

 .95

 1.10

 1.08

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .10

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

PRECIP

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

APRIL 2009 SHASTA LAKE DAILY OPERATIONS RUN DATE: May 1, 2009

IN LAKE

EVAPORATION

INCHES

C.F.S.

COMPUTED*

1000 ACRE-FEET

RELEASE - C.F.S.

RIVER

TOTALS +117.8 230,554 163,495 0 3,745 4,004 6.03 3.25

ACRE-FEET +117,800 457,304 324,292 0 7,428 7,942

COMMENTS:

* COMPUTED INFLOW IS THE SUM OF CHANGE IN STORAGE, RELEASES AND EVAPORATION.

SUMMARY

RELEASE (ACRE-FEET)

POWER 324,292

SPILL 0

OUTLET

TOTAL

 7,428

 331,720

PRECIPITATION

THIS MONTH =

TO DATE =

 3.25

JULY 1, 2008 45.01

 2,880.6
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY HIGH

 27,056

 27,006

 27,409

 26,590

 26,151

 24,007

 22,785

 22,816

 24,312

 24,348

 23,988

 25,511

 25,619

 26,386

 27,847

 28,106

 26,342

 25,478

 25,073

 24,238

 22,578

 21,216

 22,093

 24,171

 25,650

 28,015

 27,475

 27,549

 28,852

 28,069

 25,977

 13,446

 12,585

 12,870

 14,162

 13,937

 12,699

 13,245

 14,066

 15,541

 15,207

 14,054

 14,278

 13,697

 14,247

 14,431

 14,788

 14,738

 13,539

 13,433

 13,903

 11,722

 12,229

 13,243

 14,370

 14,362

 15,320

 14,914

 14,255

 13,773

 14,426

 13,345

 19,910

 19,665

 19,362

 19,881

 19,305

 18,303

 18,265

 18,775

 19,680

 19,707

 18,947

 20,124

 19,960

 20,268

 20,881

 21,141

 20,649

 19,726

 19,285

 18,858

 17,057

 16,850

 17,847

 18,810

 20,274

 21,612

 21,207

 20,925

 21,146

 21,204

 19,996

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

OCTOBER 2007 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: November 13, 2007

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

PORT CHICAGO BOTTOM IN SUISUN BAY
Exhibit
23.1




CONSENT
OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM




We have
issued our report dated February 17, 2011 with respect to the consolidated
financial statements and schedule included in the annual report of ATS
Corporation on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2010.  We
hereby consent to the incorporation by reference of said report in the
Registration Statements of ATS Corporation on Form S-3 (No. 333-124638,
effective May 14, 2008) and on Form S-8 (No. 333-146075, effective
September 14, 2007).




/S/ Grant
Thornton LLP




McLean,
Virginia


February
17, 2011
Gama Charters Inc.

Sikorsky Memorial Airport

700 Great Meadow Road

Stratford, CT 06615

t: +1 203 385 3426

f: +1 203 380 6639

www.gamacharters.com

Ref: Petition for CL604 Exemption 

Request for an Exemption from 14 CFR 135.152 "Appendix F to Part 135—Airplane Flight Recorder

Specification", specifically the requirement to meet the parameter "5. Normal acceleration (Vertical)"

sampling rate of 8 times per second. This is due to being advised that certain DFDR systems

installed in CL604 aircraft by Bombardier have been found to only sample this specific parameter at

5 times per second.

The request is a request for relief so that affected aircraft may continue to operate while Bombardier

engineers a solution to the issue. The DFDR is a recording tool and does not affect the safe

operation of the aircraft. It is an important tool for accident investigations, and even though does not

meet the specific parameters for 14 CFR 135 operations, it does exceed what is required for 14

CFR 91 operations, and will still continue to provide useful data if needed.

We operate these aircraft under our Part 135 Air Carrier Certificate O2GA970i and request this exemption 

be granted until Bombardier is able to define a modification for this requirement.

We operate three CL604 aircraft: N604VG sn5562, N848CC sn5660, N868CC sn5662.

Sincerely,

Martin Farrar

Director of Maintenance
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY ELEV

 221.94

 222.00

 222.67

 222.47

 221.78

 221.50

 221.36

 221.22

 222.20

 223.49

 223.99

 223.43

 221.97

 220.67

 219.55

 221.47

 221.29

 220.87

 220.43

 219.55

 217.80

 219.78

 222.50

 221.90

 218.25

 220.57

 221.77

 218.28

 221.14

 223.00

 222.78

 48,229

 48,385

 50,166

 49,634

 47,809

 47,073

 46,705

 46,338

 48,916

 52,357

 53,700

 52,196

 48,308

 44,897

 41,990

 46,994

 46,521

 45,420

 44,270

 41,990

 37,578

 42,583

 49,713

 48,124

 38,694

 44,635

 47,782

 38,770

 46,128

 51,046

 50,459

STORAGE

+1,944

+156

+1,781

-532

-1,825

-736

-368

-367

+2,578

+3,441

+1,343

-1,504

-3,888

-3,411

-2,907

+5,004

-473

-1,101

-1,150

-2,280

-4,412

+5,005

+7,130

-1,589

-9,430

+5,941

+3,147

-9,012

+7,358

+4,918

-587

CHANGE

300

198

298

351

292

238

209

237

1,283

2,063

2,401

2,564

2,912

3,118

3,123

2,470

2,547

2,250

1,710

1,622

1,614

1,836

2,378

2,436

2,177

2,602

2,617

2,603

2,627

2,664

2,373

PUMPING

 116

 115

 0

 0

 0

 0

 53

 265

 0

 542

 1,688

 1,250

 2,064

 1,936

 1,794

 906

 369

 366

 0

 305

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 429

 229

 231

 0

 0

 156

PUMPING

 2,324

 4,279

 4,910

 5,615

 5,550

 5,477

 5,367

 5,968

 6,480

 6,480

 6,517

 8,748

 9,442

 9,598

 9,908

 2,841

 4,721

 4,762

 4,377

 4,360

 6,362

 2,190

 2,185

 5,820

 10,803

 2,689

 3,789

 9,737

 2,412

 4,224

 5,271

PUMPING

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

GEN.

*

+69

+384

+327

+289

+275

+260

+276

+288

+226

+185

+461

+289

-88

-111

-125

-140

-275

-141

-183

-200

-72

-21

-13

-279

-264

+5

-131

-161

-5

-49

-172

OR

UNITED STATES 

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION

CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT

CONSOLIDATED STATE-FEDERAL O'NEILL FOREBAY January 16, 2015

DAILY OPERATIONS

DECEMBER 2014 RUN DATE:

IN LAKE GEN.

ACRE-FEET O'NEILL

RELEASE - C.F.S. 

TOTALS +4,174 56,113 0 173,206 12,814 +904

ACRE-FEET +4,174 111,300 0 343,554 25,417

SUMMARY

 20

RELEASE (ACRE-FEET)

O'NEILL GEN. 0

SAN LUIS PUMP 343,554 20

 46,285

DOS AMIGOS PUMP 25,417

DELIVERIES 

S. LUIS O'NEILL

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

CALIF. DOS AMIGOS

AQUEDUCT

3,051

3,891

5,183

4,706

4,063

4,608

4,749

5,523

6,270

6,509

6,020

6,387

6,721

6,808

7,238

3,941

2,579

2,463

2,269

2,093

2,596

2,898

3,415

2,862

4,135

3,506

3,119

2,983

3,500

4,089

2,942

 131,117

 260,071

S. LUIS

DELIV.

GAINS(+)

LOSS(-)

C.F.S.

INFLOW - C.F.S.

STATE OF CALIFORNIA

THE RESOURCES AGENCY

DEPARTMENT OF WATER RESOURCES

STATE WATER PROJECT

TOTAL 368,991

 1,793

* DAILY DEL. FIGURES UNAVAILABLE. TOT. DEL. IS INCLUDED IN COMPUTING MONTHLY TOTALS 

Table 18
# C_2012031EN.01000701.xml

| 4.2.2012 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 31/7 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

4.2.2012

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 31/7

---

Final Report of the Hearing Officer (1)

1

COMP/39.592 — Standard & Poor's

2012/C 31/04

The draft Commitment Decision pursuant to Article 9(1) of Regulation (EC) No 1/2003 concerns Standard & Poor's, a subsidiary of The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. Standard & Poor's, as the sole-appointed US numbering agency, which is alleged to have abused its dominant position within the meaning of Article 102 of the TFEU by charging unfair prices for the use of US International Securities Identification Numbers (‘ISINs’) in the EEA. ISINs are identifiers for securities and are indispensible for operations such as interbank communication, clearing and settlement, custody, reporting to authorities and reference data management.

The case against Standard & Poor's originated from a joint complaint submitted by the European Fund and Asset Management Agency (‘EFAMA’) and other associations.

On 6 January 2009 the Commission opened proceedings with a view to taking a decision under Chapter III of Regulation (EC) No 1/2003 (2) and adopted a statement of objections on 13 November 2009. While disagreeing with the preliminary findings, Standard & Poor's submitted a set of commitments on 7 April 2011 to meet the competition concerns of the Commission. The company offered to abolish all charges to indirect end users of US ISINs. With respect to direct users, Standard & Poor's undertook to distribute US ISIN records separately from other added value data. The initial price of this service was to be set at USD 15 000 per annum.

2

On 14 May 2011, the Commission published a summary of the case and the main content of the commitments in the Official Journal of the European Union pursuant to Article 27(4). It invited interested third parties to submit observations. Having received a number of responses, in particular from end users, it informed Standard & Poor's of the observations it had received. In light of these, the company submitted final revised commitments in September 2011.

Official Journal of the European Union

After the Commission had informed the complainants about the revised commitments, they withdrew their complaint.

The Commission has now come to the conclusion that, without prejudice to Article 9(2), the proceedings should be brought to an end.

No queries or submissions have been made to me in connection with the present case by Standard & Poor's or any third parties.

I consider therefore that the right to be heard has been respected in this case.

Brussels, 26 October 2011.

Michael ALBERS

---

(1)  Pursuant to Articles 16 and 17 of Decision 2011/695/EU of the President of the European Commission of 13 October 2011 on the function and terms of reference of the hearing officer in certain competition proceedings (OJ L 275, 20.10.2011, p. 29).

1

(2)  In the following, all Articles referred to relate to Regulation (EC) No 1/2003.

2

---
### SUBCHAPTER V—MASIH ALINEJAD HARASSMENT AND UNLAWFUL TARGETING

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Subchapter was enacted as part of the Masih Alinejad Harassment and Unlawful Targeting Act of 2022, also known as the Masih Alinejad HUNT Act of 2022, and not as part of the Comprehensive Iran Sanctions, Accountability, and Divestment Act of 2010 which comprises this chapter.
Final Listing of Questionnaire Files for Steam Electric Rulemaking Record

Plant ID 03585

Removed 

from Public 

(Non-CBI) 

Docket1

Copyright 

Flag2File Name3

Description

x 03585\03585_Checklist.xls EPA Technical Review Checklist Workbook

03585\03585_Completeness_Checklist.xls EPA Completeness Review Checklist

x 03585\03585_PartA.xls Plant submitted survey file

x 03585\03585_PartB.xls Plant submitted survey file

x 03585\03585_PartC.xls Plant submitted survey file

x 03585\03585_PartD.xls Plant submitted survey file

x 03585\03585_PartE.xls Plant submitted survey file

x 03585\03585_PartH.xls Plant submitted survey file

03585\Certification Statement Plant ID 03585.pdf Plant certification statement

03585\Supplemental Documents\Attachments\A5-2 Map-1 - Property Boundary.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey

x x 03585\Supplemental Documents\Attachments\A5-2 Map-2 - Site Features.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey

x 03585\Supplemental Documents\Attachments\A5-3 WB-1.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey

x 03585\Supplemental Documents\Attachments\A5-3 WB-2.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey

1

 Final reviewed survey responses are located in the Steam Electric Technical Questionnaire Database . 

2

 Copyright documents are available from the docket. 

3

 No hardcopy log is included for this plant as no hardcopy materials were received.