# EUR-Lex - 52013DC0373 - EN

*|*

# 52013DC0373

**Recommendation for a COUNCIL RECOMMENDATION on Romania’s 2013 national reform programme and delivering a Council opinion on Romania’s convergence programme for 2012-2016 /* COM/2013/0373 final */**

			*

			*

Recommendation for a

COUNCIL RECOMMENDATION

on Romania’s 2013 national reform
programme
and delivering a Council opinion on Romania’s convergence programme for
2012-2016

THE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION,

Having regard to the Treaty on the
Functioning of the European Union, and in particular Articles 121(2) and 148(4)
thereof,

Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No
1466/97 of 7 July 1997 on the strengthening of the surveillance of budgetary
positions and the surveillance and coordination of economic policies[1], and in particular Article 9(2)
thereof,

Having regard to the recommendation of the
European Commission[2],

Having regard to the resolutions of the
European Parliament[3],

Having regard to the conclusions of the
European Council,

Having regard to the opinion of the
Employment Committee,

After consulting the Economic and Financial
Committee,

Whereas:

(1)       On 26 March 2010, the
European Council agreed to the Commission’s proposal to launch a new strategy
for growth and jobs, Europe 2020, based on enhanced coordination of economic
policies, which will focus on the key areas where action is needed to boost Europe’s potential for sustainable growth and competitiveness.

(2)       On 13 July 2010, the
Council, on the basis of the Commission's proposals, adopted a recommendation
on the broad guidelines for the economic policies of the Member States and the
Union (2010 to 2014) and, on 21 October 2010, adopted a decision on guidelines
for the employment policies of the Member States[4],
which together form the ‘integrated guidelines’. Member States were invited to
take the integrated guidelines into account in their national economic and
employment policies.

(3)       On 29 June 2012, the Heads
of State or Government decided on a Compact for Growth and Jobs, providing a coherent
framework for action at national, EU and euro area levels using all possible
levers, instruments and policies. They decided on action to be taken at the level
of the Member States, in particular expressing full commitment to achieving the
objectives of the Europe 2020 Strategy and to implementing the country-specific
recommendations.

(4)       On 6 July 2012, the
Council adopted a recommendation on Romania’s national reform programme for
2012 and delivered its opinion on Romania’s updated convergence programme for
2011-2015.

(5)       On 28 November 2012, the
Commission adopted the Annual Growth Survey[5],
marking the start of the 2013 European Semester of economic policy
coordination. Also on 28 November 2012, the Commission, on the basis of
Regulation (EU) No 1176/2011, adopted the Alert Mechanism Report[6], in which it did not identify Romania as one of the Member States for which an in-depth review would be carried out.

(6)       On 14 March 2012, the
European Council endorsed the priorities for ensuring financial stability,
fiscal consolidation and action to foster growth. It underscored the need to
pursue differentiated, growth-friendly fiscal consolidation, to restore normal
lending conditions to the economy, to promote growth and competitiveness, to
tackle unemployment and the social consequences of the crisis, and to modernise
public administration.

(7)       On 30 April 2013, Romania submitted its 2013 convergence programme covering the period 2012-2016 and its 2013
national reform programme. In order to take account of their interlinkages, the
two programmes have been assessed at the same time.

(8)       Based on the assessment of
the 2013 convergence programme pursuant to Council Regulation (EC) No 1466/97,
the Council is of the opinion that the macroeconomic scenario underpinning the
budgetary projections in the programme is plausible and in line with the
assessment in the latest European Commission forecast. Thanks to substantial
consolidation efforts and in line with the Council
recommendation, Romania reduced its general government deficit to below 3% in
2012. .
The convergence programme aims at an MTO of -1% of GDP (previously -0.7% of
GDP), which is in line with the requirements of the Stability and Growth Pact.
The objective of the budgetary strategy outlined in the programme is to reach
the MTO by 2014 which, when recalculated by Commission based on the commonly
agreed methodology, corresponds to reaching the MTO by 2015. The progress in
structural terms towards the MTO is higher than 0.5% of GDP in 2013 and about
0.4% in 2014. The expenditure benchmark over the programme period was met.
Adjustment is front-loaded in 2013 with revenue-enhancing measures including
reductions in tax-deductible items, improvement in the taxation of agriculture,
the introduction of a windfall levy following the deregulation of gas prices
and introduction of a special tax on transmission of electricity and gas. The
main risks to the convergence programme relate to further possible financial
corrections linked to the absorption of EU funds, or the financing from the
national budget of priority projects, renewed accumulation of arrears,
especially at local government level, and limited progress with restructuring of
state-owned enterprises. Romania's public debt remains relatively low, at 37.8%
of GDP in 2012. It is expected to rise to 38.6% in 2014 but will remain well
below the 60% of GDP threshold over the programme period

(9)       Following a request by Romania on 17 February 2011, the European Commission and the IMF negotiated a precautionary
economic adjustment programme with the Romanian authorities. In the context of
the EU’s precautionary assistance, Romania undertook to implement a
comprehensive economic-policy programme with a particular focus on structural
reform measures to improve the functioning of labour and product markets and
increase the resilience and growth potential of the Romanian economy. In
parallel, the programme has ensured that fiscal consolidation continues, that management
and control of public finances improve, and that reforms are implemented in
external, monetary, financial stability, and financial market policies. In
March 2013, Romania formally requested a three-month extension of the IMF
programme. While the possibility to draw on funds under the EU programme
expired at the end of March 2013, the final programme review will take place by
the end of June 2013.

(10)     Romania's fiscal position
has been improving with the budget deficit decreasing below 3% in 2012 and a
further fiscal consolidation expected for 2013. Low tax compliance represents a
major challenge for Romania’s tax system, in particular in the areas of VAT and
labour taxation. Environmental taxes are below the EU average. Romania's public debt remains low, at 34.7% of GDP in 2011. It is expected to rise to 38% in
2014 but will remain below the 60% of GDP threshold. While Romania does not face a risk of fiscal stress in the short or medium-term, it is at medium
risk in the long-term due to age-related expenditure. There are concerns as
regards the sustainability and adequacy of the pension system due to a low
ratio of employed contributors to people drawing pensions. Romania is now one of the two Member States that have not yet decided to equalise the
pensionable age for women and men and the employment rate of older workers (41.4 %
in 2012) is substantially below the EU average.

(11)     The health sector in Romania features major inequities in terms of access to and quality of services provided. This
is due also to the inefficient use of resources and to poor management. Reforms
to improve the efficiency of the healthcare sector have begun but continuous
efforts are needed. The cost-effectiveness of the system could be increased by
reducing the excessive use of hospital in-patient care and by strengthening
primary care and referral systems.

(12)     Romania continued to have a
low employment rate (63.8 %) in 2012 although a slight improvement was
registered on the year before (up from 62.8 %). The country’s Europe 2020
target of 70 % by 2020 remains difficult to reach. Romanian labour
productivity is still one of the lowest in the EU. The quality of public
employment activation, job search and retraining services is still relatively
low. Limited administrative capacity does not allow for the efficient delivery
of active labour market policies through quality personalised services, nor for
the better integration of active and passive labour market policies. Adult
participation in lifelong learning remains stagnant at very low levels (1.6 %
in 2011), significantly lower than the EU average (8.9 %). The youth
employment and activity rates were among the lowest in the EU in 2012 (23.9%
and 30.9% respectively), whereas the youth unemployment rate was high at 22.7%
in 2012. Romania registers a high and increasing share of young people neither
in employment, nor in education and training (16.8% in 2012).

(13)     Poverty reduction continues
to be a major challenge. In 2011, 40.3 % of the population are at risk of
poverty and social exclusion, about two thirds more than the EU average of 24.2 %.
Children are particularly affected (49.1 %). The impact of social
transfers (excluding pensions) in reducing poverty remains significantly below
the average efficiency of transfers in the EU, both for the population as a
whole (23.7 % in Romania as against 37.5 % for the EU in 2011) and
for children (22 % compared to 42.8 % for the EU). The low take-up,
coverage and adequacy of social benefits remain a challenge for the efficiency
of social benefits in reducing poverty. In the field of social assistance,
several pieces of legislation were adopted in 2012 as follow-up to the reform
of 2011. The adoption of the remaining legislation would be an important step
towards completing the reform. However the link with activation measures could
be further strengthened. The implementation of the National Roma Integration
Strategy started in 2012, but the results are modest. Better coordination
between different stakeholders is needed for an effective implementation of the
strategy, including the allocation of financing.

(14)     The education law of 2011,
a major reform that set a long-term agenda for upgrading the quality of
education at all levels, is not yet fully operational. For a successful
implementation of the education reform the necessary financial and human
resources will have to be devoted to building up administrative capacity and
policy making. Romania faces a major challenge in raising the quality of its
education and training system. Early school leaving is a significant challenge;
at 17.3 % in 2012, the Romanian early school-leaving rate is well above
both the EU average of 13.5 % and the national target of 11.3 %. Problems
persist especially in rural and remote areas and for the Roma. Romania also lacks an adequate data collection mechanism regarding early school leavers; a
comprehensive strategy, to be adopted this year, should help in this regard. Access
to quality affordable early childhood education and care remains problematic. Mismatches
between skills and labour market demand are characteristic of a large proportion
of vocational and tertiary education programmes, with the poor level of
vocational skills being a specific challenge. The high unemployment rate among
tertiary graduates and the rate of over-qualification make a further alignment
of tertiary education with the labour market a high priority. Positive but slow
progress was registered in the transition from institutional to alternative
care for children deprived of parental care but further efforts are needed.

(15)     Poor administrative capacity
is a core concern for Romania. The public administration is characterised by an
inconsistent legal framework, frequent recourse to emergency ordinances, low
levels of inter-ministerial cooperation and excessive bureaucracy. It is also
undermined by a lack of skills, a lack of transparency in staff recruitment and
high management turnover rates. Poor administrative capacity contributes to low
absorption of EU funds. The end-2012 absorption target agreed under the EU
financial assistance programme was missed by a wide margin. Cumulative
absorption by the end of 2012 stood at EUR 5.53 billion or 20.2 % of the
total available structural, cohesion and agricultural funds. This was EUR 2.47
billion short of the programme’s end-2012 target of EUR 8 bn. The absorption
rate of structural and cohesion funds is even lower, standing at 13 % at
the end of March 2013. The absorption of EU funds stalled for most of the
second half of 2012, after several deficiencies in management and control
systems and in public procurement were identified by national and European
auditors. There is a significant risk that a substantial part of structural and
cohesion funds will be de-committed in 2013.

(16)     Romania faces a number of
challenges in economic competitiveness with productivity in industry and
services remaining low. Major challenges are a weak business environment and
low support for research and development (R&D). Improvements to the
business environment should be integrated into a wider, coherent e-government
strategy to promote an administrative culture of transparency and legal
certainty and provide for better public online services. Romania should also undertake efforts to ease access to finance and to reduce the administrative
burden on SMEs. R&D intensity is extremely low (0.48 % in 2011) and
the efficiency and effectiveness of investment need to be substantially
improved. Investors in R&D need to prioritise activities that have potential
to attract private investment. Romania should also strengthen the intellectual
property rights framework with a view to increasing the commercialisation of
research results.

(17)     Romania has a low degree of
competition and efficiency in the energy and transport industries. Inefficiency
and intransparent governance of the state-owned enterprises in these sectors
represent a major challenge. Increasing energy efficiency in buildings, district
heating, industry and transport is a further key challenge. Romania is the third most energy-intensive economy in the EU whose energy intensity is 2.5
times higher than the EU average. It is also the third most carbon-intensive
economy in the EU. Residential buildings in Romania use eight times more energy
than the EU-15 average due to an inefficient district heating system and the fact
that buildings are not insulated appropriately. The integration of Romania's electricity and gas markets in the EU markets remains incomplete and crossborder
connections for gas still have to be implemented.

(18)     In the context of the
European Semester, the Commission has carried out a comprehensive analysis of Romania’s economic policy. It has assessed the convergence programme and
national reform programme. It has taken into account not only their relevance
for sustainable fiscal and socio-economic policy in Romania but also their
compliance with EU rules and guidance, given the need to reinforce the overall
economic governance of the European Union by providing EU-level input into
future national decisions. Its recommendations under the European Semester are
reflected in recommendations (1) to (8) below.

(19)     In the light of this
assessment, the Council has examined Romania’s convergence programme, and its
opinion[7]
is reflected in particular in recommendation (1) below,

HEREBY RECOMMENDS that Romania should take action within the period 2013-2014 to:

1.           Complete the EU/IMF
financial assistance programme.

2.           Ensure growth-friendly fiscal
consolidation and implement the budgetary strategy for the year 2013 and beyond
as envisaged, thus ensuring achievement of the medium-term objective by 2015. Improve
tax collection by implementing a comprehensive tax compliance strategy and
fight undeclared work. In parallel, explore ways to increase reliance on
environmental taxes. Equalise the pensionable age for men and women and underpin
the pension reform by promoting the employability of older workers.

3.           Pursue health sector
reforms to increase its efficiency, quality and accessibility, in particular
for disadvantaged people and remote and isolated communities. Reduce the
excessive use of hospital care including by strengthening outpatient care.

4.           Improve labour market
participation, as well as employability and productivity of the labour force,
by reviewing and strengthening active labour market policies, to provide
training and individualised services and promoting lifelong learning. Enhance
the capacity of the National Employment Agency to increase the quality and
coverage of its services. To fight youth unemployment, implement without delay the
National Plan for Youth Employment, including for example through a Youth
Guarantee. To alleviate poverty, improve the effectiveness and efficiency of
social transfers with a particular focus on children. Complete the social
assistance reform by adopting the relevant legislation and strengthening its
link with activation measures. Ensure concrete delivery of the National Roma
integration strategy.

5.           Speed up the education
reform including the building up of administrative capacity at both central and
local level and evaluate the impact of the reforms. Step up reforms in
vocational education and training. Further align tertiary education with the
needs of the labour market and improve access for disadvantaged people. Implement
a national strategy on early school leaving focusing on better access to quality
early childhood education, including for Roma children. Speed up the transition
from institutional to alternative care for children deprived of parental care.

6.           Strengthen governance and
the quality of institutions and the public administration, in particular by
improving the capacity for strategic and budgetary planning, by increasing the
professionalism of the public service through improved human resource
management and by strengthening the mechanisms for coordination between the
different levels of government. Significantly improve the quality of
regulations through the use of impact assessments, and systematic evaluations.
Step up efforts to accelerate the absorption of EU funds in particular by
strengthening management and control systems and improving public procurement.

7.           Improve and simplify the
business environment in particular through reducing administrative burdens on
SMEs and implementing a coherent e-government strategy. Ease and diversify
access to finance for SMEs. Ensure closer links between research, innovation
and industry, in particular by prioritising research and development activities
that have the potential to attract private investment. Step up efforts to improve
the quality, independence and efficiency of the judicial system in resolving
cases and fight corruption more effectively.

8.           Promote competition and
efficiency in network industries, by ensuring the independence and capacity of
national regulatory authorities, and by continuing the corporate governance
reform of state-owned enterprises in the energy and transport sectors. Adopt a
comprehensive long-term transport plan and improve broadband infrastructure. Continue
to remove regulated gas and electricity prices and improve energy efficiency.
Improve the cross-border integration of energy networks and speed up
implementation of the gas interconnection projects.

Done at Brussels,

For
the Council

The
President

[1]               OJ L 209, 2.8.1997, p. 1.

[2]               COM(2013) 373 final.

[3]               P7_TA(2013)0052 and P7_TA(2013)0053.

[4]               Council Decision 2013/208/EU of 22 April 2013.

[5]               COM(2012) 750 final.

[6]               COM(2012) 751 final.

[7]               Under Article 9(2) of Council Regulation (EC) No
1466/97.