alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 422.415 Will we reduce the amount that your employer must withhold from your pay when withholding that amount causes financial hardship? ( a ) *General.* Unless paragraph (d) of this section applies, we will reduce the amount that your employer must withhold from your pay when you request the reduction and we find financial hardship. In any event, we will not reduce the amount your employer must withhold each payday below $10. When we decide to reduce the amount that your employer withholds, we will give you and your employer written notice. ( 1 ) You may ask us at any time to reduce the amount due to financial hardship.
( 2 ) If you request review of the payment schedule stated in the notice described in § 422.405 within the 60-day period stated in the notice, we will not issue a garnishment order to your employer until we notify you of our decision.
( b ) *Financial hardship.* We will find financial hardship when you show that withholding a particular amount from your pay would deprive you of income necessary to meet your ordinary and necessary living expenses. You must give us evidence of your financial resources and expenses.
( c ) *Ordinary and necessary living expenses.* Ordinary and necessary living expenses include: ( 1 ) Fixed expenses such as food, clothing, housing, utilities, maintenance, insurance, tax payments;
( 2 ) Medical, hospitalization and similar expenses;
( 3 ) Expenses for the support of others for whom you are legally responsible; and
( 4 ) Other reasonable and necessary miscellaneous expenses which are part of your standard of living.
( d ) *Fraud and willful concealment or failure to furnish information.* ( 1 ) We will not reduce the amount that your employer withholds from your disposable pay if your debt was caused by: ( i ) Your intentional false statement, or
( ii ) Your willful concealment of, or failure to furnish, material information.
( 2 ) “Willful concealment” means an intentional, knowing and purposeful delay in providing, or failure to reveal, material information.
Electrical Conductivity, UMHOS

Day High Low Mean

1 0 0 0

2 0 0 0

3 0 0 0

4 0 0 0

5 0 0 0

6 0 0 0

7 0 0 0

8 0 0 0

9 0 0 0

10 0 0 0

11 0 0 0

12 0 0 0

13 0 0 0

14 0 0 0

15 0 0 0

16 0 0 0

17 0 0 0

18 0 0 0

19 0 0 0

20 0 0 0

21 0 0 0

22 0 0 0

23 0 0 0

24 0 0 0

25 0 0 0

26 0 0 0

27 0 0 0

28 0 0 0

29 0 0 0

30 0 0 0

31 0 0 0

COMMENT(S):

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

Historical Archive and Report Database

Pittsburg TopOn The Sacramento River

Period: December 2022 Run Date: 1/4/2023
§ 422.823 Debtor rights to review or copy records, submit repayment proposals, or request administrative review. ( a ) A debtor who intends to review or copy our records with respect to the debt must notify us in writing within 30 days of the date of the notice as described in section § 422.822. In response, we will notify the debtor of the location, time, and any other conditions for reviewing and copying. The debtor may be liable for reasonable copying expenses.
( b ) In response to the notice as described in section § 422.822, the debtor may propose a written agreement to repay the debt as an alternative to Administrative Offset. Any debtor who wishes to do this must submit a written proposal for repayment of the debt, which we must receive within 30 days of the date of the notice as described in section § 422.822 or 15 days after the date of a decision adverse to the debtor. In response, we will notify the debtor whether we need additional information, for example, financial status information. We will obtain any necessary authorization required to approve the agreement, and we will issue a written determination whether the proposed agreement is acceptable. In exercising our discretion, we will balance the Government's interest in collecting the debt against fairness to the debtor.
( c ) A debtor must request an administrative review of the debt within 30 days of the date of the notice as described in section § 422.822 for purposes of a proposed collection by non-centralized Administrative Offset pursuant to § 422.824. A debtor must request an administrative review of the debt within 60 days of the date of the notice as described in section § 422.822 for purposes of a proposed collection by centralized Administrative Offset for offset against other Federal payments that would include tax refunds pursuant to § 422.825. ( 1 ) For purposes of this section, whenever we are required to provide a debtor a review within the agency, we will give the debtor a reasonable opportunity for an oral hearing, either by telephone or in person, when the debtor requests reconsideration of the debt and we determine that the question of the indebtedness cannot be resolved by review of the documentary evidence.
( 2 ) Unless otherwise required by law, an oral hearing under this section is not required to be a formal evidentiary hearing, although we will carefully document all significant matters discussed at the hearing.
( 3 ) An oral hearing is not required with respect to debts where determinations of indebtedness rarely involve issues of credibility or veracity, and we have determined that a review of the written record is adequate to correct prior mistakes.
( 4 ) In those cases when an oral hearing is not required by this section, we will provide the debtor a paper hearing, that is, a determination of the request for reconsideration based upon a review of the written record.
#### In the Matter of David Hendrickson et al., Appellants, against Charles E. Ransom, as County Clerk of Nassau County, Respondent.

No opinion. Present — Close, P. J., Carswell, Johnston, Adel and Taylor, JJ.
[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 77 (Thursday, April 21, 2011)]
[Notices]
[Page 22396]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2011-9667]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

Office of the Secretary


Delegation of Authority

    Notice is hereby given that I have delegated to the Commissioner of 
Food and Drugs the authorities vested in the Secretary of Health and 
Human Services under Section 3 of the Comprehensive Smokeless Tobacco 
Health Education Act of 1986 (15 U.S.C. 4402) (as amended by the Family 
Smoking Prevention and Tobacco Control Act), as amended. These 
authorities may be redelegated.
    These authorities shall be exercised under the Department's policy 
on regulations and the existing delegation of authority to approve and 
issue regulations. In addition, I hereby ratify and affirm any actions 
taken by the Commissioner of Food and Drugs, or other FDA officials, 
which involved the exercise of the authorities delegated herein prior 
to the effective date of this delegation. This delegation is effective 
upon signature.

(Authority: Section 6 of the Reorganization Plan No. 1 of 1953, 
Section 2 of the Reorganization Plan No. 3 of 1966, and 5 U.S.C. 
301.)

    Dated: April 14, 2011.
Kathleen Sebelius,
Secretary of Health and Human Services.
[FR Doc. 2011-9667 Filed 4-20-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4160-01-P
#### § 404.1029 Student nurses.

If you are a student nurse, your work for a hospital or nurses training school is excluded from employment if you are enrolled and regularly attending classes in a nurses training school which is chartered or approved under State law.
Exhibit 13.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ENACTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

Each of the undersigned, Ross A. Grieve, President and Chief Executive Officer, and Gordon D. Maron, Vice President, Secretary/Treasurer, of PCL Employees Holdings Ltd. (the Company), certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section
1350, as enacted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of his knowledge:



|(i) | the Companys annual report on Form 20-F for the fiscal year ended October 31, 2008 (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d)
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|--- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|(ii) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
|---- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Dated: January 16, 2009



/s/ ROSS A. GRIEVERoss A. GrievePresident and Chief Executive Officer/s/ GORDON D. MARONGordon D. MaronVice President, Secretary/Treasurer


A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided
to PCL Employees Holdings Ltd. and will be retained by PCL Employees Holdings Ltd. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
Exhibit 32.2
 Written Statement
Pursuant To
18 U.S.C. Section 1350
     By:
    
    /s/ JOHN A. ELWOOD

Senior Vice PresidentFinance and Administration,
Chief Financial Officer
1 The Honorable Charles B. Kornmann, United States District Judge for the District of South Dakota. 

## United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________ No. 05-3968

___________ United States of America, * * Appellee, * * Appeal from the United States v. * District Court for the * District of South Dakota. Todd Brave Crow, * * [UNPUBLISHED] Appellant. *

___________ Submitted: October 19, 2006 Filed: October 20, 2006

___________ Before MURPHY, BYE, and MELLOY, Circuit Judges.

___________ PER CURIAM. Todd Brave Crow pleaded guilty to assault resulting in serious bodily injury, and was sentenced to 33 months in prison a nd 3 years of supervised release. After Brave Crow began serving his supervised release, the probation officer petitioned for revocation, alleging that Brave Crow had vi olated his release conditions. Brave Crow admitted violating the conditions of his s upervised release as alleged. At a subsequent revocation hearing, the district court 1 revoked supervised release and imposed a new sentence of 24 months in prison, commenting on the Chapter 7-2- Guidelines recommended range, Brave Crow’s prior and current supervised release violations, and his fa ilure to pay res titution, and also noting that due to his record leniency was not appropriate. Brave Crow appeals his revocation sentence.
The revocation sentence was within authorized limits, and the district court considered appropriate fact ors in imposing it. See 18 U.S.C. §§ 3553(a), 3583(e)(3). We conclude that Brave Crow’s sentence is not unreasonable. See United States v. Tyson , 413 F.3d 824, 825 (8th Cir. 2005) (per curiam) (revocation sentences are reviewed for unreasonableness in accord ance with United States v. Booker , 543 U.S. 220 (2005)). Accordingly, we affirm.

______________________________
### §281b–1. Repealed. Aug. 26, 1954, ch. 937, title V, §544(b), 68 Stat. 862

Section, act Sept. 3, 1949, ch. 532, §1, 63 Stat. 685, related to contract authorizations.
(No. 73-CC-359

#### M. S. Ginn and Company, Claimant, *vs.*State of Illinois, Department of Business and Economic Development, Respondent.

*Opinion filed July 19, 1973.*

M. S. Ginn and Company, Claimant, pro se.

William J. Scott, Attorney General; William E. Webber, Assistant Attorney General, for Respondent.

Per Curiam.
#### § 225.21 Survivor Tier I PIA.

The Survivor Tier I PIA is used in computing the tier I component of a survivor annuity. This PIA is determined in accordance with section 215 of the Social Security Act using the deceased employee's combined railroad and social security earnings after 1950 (or after 1936 if a higher PIA would result) through the date of the employee's death.
* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3. ** The Honorable Ralph R. Beistline, Unite d States District Judge for the District of Alaska, sitting by designation. NOT FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
ALVIN BENSON MACK, Petitioner - Appellant,
v. DEBRA DEXTER, Respondent - Appellee. No. 07-56392 D.C. No. CV-06-00356-SJO
MEMORANDUM *

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Central District of California S. James Otero, District Judge, Presiding Argued and Submitted February 11, 2010 Pasadena, California Before: THOMAS and SILVERMAN, Circuit Judges, and BEISTLINE, ** Chief District Judge. Alvin Benson Mack appeals the district court’s denial of his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 habeas petition asserting that his California three strikes sentence of 27 years to life for violating Cal. Penal Code § 290 violates the Eighth Amendment. We 

# FILED
FEB 16 2010 MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS2 have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C . §§ 1291 and 2253 and reverse and remand with instructions to grant the petition. We review the district court’s denial of the habeas petition de novo. Gonzalez v. Duncan , 551 F.3d 875, 879 (9th Cir. 2008). Since the state court denied Mack’s claim without explanation, we independently review Mack’s claim to determine if the California Supreme Court unreasonably applied clearly established law. Davis v. Woodford , 446 F.3d 957, 960 (9th Cir. 2006). The record in this case establishes that the jury could have found – and likely did find – Mack guilty of merely failing to update his registration on his birthday, which the California courts regard as a mere technical violation of § 290. People v. Carmony , 26 Cal. Rptr. 3d 365 (Ct. App. 2005); People v. Cluff , 105 Cal. Rptr. 2d 80, 86-88 (Ct. App. 2001). A sentence of 28 years to life for a technical violation of § 290 runs afoul of the Eighth Amendment. See Gonzalez , 551 F.3d at 877. REVERSED AND REMANDED.
(No. 4093

#### David S. Hendricks, Claimant, *vs.*State of Illinois, Respondent.

*Opinion filed December*7, *1949.*

Eugene H. Widman, Attorney for Claimant.

Ivan A. Elliott, Attorney General; C. Arthur Nebel, Assistant Attorney General, for Respondent.

*69Delaney, J.

On June 18, 1948, the claimant filed his complaint in the above entitled cause.

The complaint alleges that on April 29, 1943, while claimant was employed as an electrician at Granite City Street Plant in Granite City, Illinois, he was taken from his employment and wrongfully detained by officers, agents or employees of the State of Illinois.

The record consists of a complaint, a motion of respondent to dismiss, notice to call up motion to dismiss, an amended complaint, a motion of respondent to dismiss amended complaint and notice to call up motion to dismiss.

The claimant, David S. Hendricks, was held by the State of Illinois by virtue of the judgment of the County Court of St. Clair County, signed by J. E. Fleming, Judge of the County Court of St. Clair County, Illinois, whereby it was ordered and adjudged that the said David S. Hendricks be re-committed to the Alton State Hospital at Alton, Illinois, a copy of which judgment) finding and order, duly certified to by George Renner, Jr., Clerk of the County Court in St. Clair County, is in the record.

Having concluded that claimant had been properly detained, it is unnecessary to discuss any other questions.

The motion of the Attorney General is allowed.

Complaint dismissed.
#### § 369.1 Unofficial use of the seal of the Railroad Retirement Board.

Use of the seal of the Railroad Retirement Board for non-Agency business is prohibited unless permission for use of the seal has been obtained in accordance with this part.
Figure 2.4. Two-dimensional model results depicting velocity magnitude and direction between 63rd Street and Blue Parkway. 

94°31'50" 94°31'40" 94°31'30" 94°31'20" 94°31'10"

39°01'20"

39°01'30"

39°01'40"

0 50 100 150 200 METERS

0 200 400 600 800 FEET

Hardesty

Brighton

Avenue

Avenue

NOTE: Upstream boundary condition at 63rd Street Bridge: 

 discharge equals 23,210 cubic feet per second

 

 Downstream boundary condition at lower Blue Parkway Bridge:

 stage elevation equals 756 feet

EXPLANATION

VELOCITY VECTOR—Indicates direction of flow and

 color represents magnitude, in feet per second

 >, greater than

0 to 2

>2 to 4

>4 to 6

>6 to 8

Base from Jackson County Management Information Systems digital data, 1:833, 2003

Universal Transverse Mercator projection

Zone 15

Horizontal coordinate information is referenced to the 

North American Datum of 1983 (NAD83)
#### James H. Thompson, Respondent, v. Prudential Insurance Company of America, Appellant.

*784Present—Close, P. J., Carswell, Johnston, Adel and Lewis, JJ.
### §283s. Illegal drug traffic; loan restrictions

The Secretary of the Treasury shall instruct the United States Executive Director of the Bank to vote against any loan or other utilization of the funds of the Bank for the benefit of any country with respect to which the President has made a determination, and so notified the Secretary of the Treasury, that the government of such country has failed to take adequate steps to prevent narcotic drugs and other controlled substances (as defined by the Comprehensive Drug Abuse Prevention and Control Act of 1970 [21 U.S.C. 801 et seq.]) produced or processed, in whole or in part, in such country, or transported through such country, from being sold illegally within the jurisdiction of such country to United States Government personnel or their dependents, or from entering the United States unlawfully. Such instruction shall continue in effect until the President determines, and so notifies the Secretary of the Treasury, that the government of such country has taken adequate steps to prevent such sale or entry of narcotic drugs and other controlled substances.

(Pub. L. 86–147, §22, as added Pub. L. 92–246, §2, Mar. 10, 1972, 86 Stat. 60.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

The Comprehensive Drug Abuse Prevention and Control Act of 1970, referred to in text, is Pub. L. 91–513, Oct. 27, 1970, 84 Stat. 1236, which is classified principally to chapter 13 (§801 et seq.) of Title 21, Food and Drugs. For complete classification of this act to the Code, see Short Title note set out under section 801 of Title 21 and Tables.
EXHIBIT 32.1



WRITTEN STATEMENT OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



The undersigned, the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of Cuisine Solutions, Inc. (the Company), each hereby certifies that, to his knowledge on the date hereof pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350(a), as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of The Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



(a)

the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended April 5, 2008 filed on the date hereof by the Company with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

(b)

information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





|                       |                                    |             
|---------------------- | ---------------------------------- | ------------
|                       |                                    |             
|/s/ Stanislas Vilgrain | Chief Executive Officer            | May 14, 2008
|Stanislas Vilgrain     |                                    |             
|                       |                                    |             
|                       |                                    |             
|/s/ Ronald Zilkowski   | Chief Financial Officer, Treasurer | May 14, 2008
|Ronald Zilkowski       | and Corporate Secretary            |
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY HIGH

 13,666

 11,744

 12,651

 13,146

 14,490

 16,683

 16,221

 17,592

 16,384

 16,594

 14,804

 15,337

 14,352

 12,136

 11,208

 8,710

 7,078

 8,001

 7,966

 10,649

 11,576

 13,211

 11,515

 13,312

 15,255

 15,981

 16,346

 16,693

 15,833

 12,364

 7,660

 4,106

 4,802

 4,479

 4,934

 6,167

 6,841

 8,793

 7,619

 6,013

 4,719

 4,964

 3,353

 3,661

 2,840

 2,249

 2,225

 2,034

 2,168

 2,125

 2,784

 3,507

 3,856

 4,238

 4,338

 4,498

 4,583

 6,356

 6,823

 6,489

 5,347

 2,731

 8,856

 8,207

 8,784

 9,798

 10,780

 11,877

 12,347

 12,582

 11,082

 10,018

 8,931

 8,324

 7,380

 6,003

 5,534

 4,760

 4,327

 4,428

 4,374

 5,302

 6,611

 7,104

 7,610

 8,079

 8,660

 10,259

 11,860

 11,262

 10,707

 8,853

 5,346

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

DECEMBER 2004 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: January 20, 2005

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

PITTSBURG TOP ON THE SACRAMENTO RIVER
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

DAY HIGH

 356

 331

 342

 313

 333

 315

 422

 523

 632

 670

 674

 791

 843

 874

 759

 697

 494

 476

 526

 691

 707

 698

 696

 887

 971

 905

 710

 739

 634

 480

 151

 161

 149

 154

 157

 161

 168

 178

 174

 168

 173

 169

 160

 169

 182

 183

 171

 174

 181

 171

 189

 186

 187

 188

 205

 188

 187

 178

 181

 180

 259

 264

 252

 236

 239

 239

 256

 297

 320

 307

 308

 352

 375

 390

 382

 363

 320

 283

 296

 341

 356

 341

 338

 393

 421

 404

 345

 340

 345

 335

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

NOVEMBER 2003 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: December 11, 2003

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

SAN ANDREAS ON THE SAN JOAQUIN RIVER
### §285s. Additional subscription to shares; authorization of appropriations

(a) The United States Governor of the Bank is authorized to subscribe on behalf of the United States to sixty-seven thousand and five hundred additional shares of the capital stock of the Bank: Provided, however, That any subscription to additional shares shall be effective only to such extent or in such amounts as are provided in advance in appropriation Acts.

(b) In order to pay for the increase in the United States subscription to the Bank provided for in this section, there are authorized to be appropriated without fiscal year limitation $814,286,250 for payment by the Secretary of the Treasury.

(Pub. L. 89–369, §22, as added Pub. L. 95–118, title V, §501, Oct. 3, 1977, 91 Stat. 1068; amended Pub. L. 97–35, title XIII, §1353, Aug. 13, 1981, 95 Stat. 745.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

1981—Subsec. (a). Pub. L. 97–35 substituted "effective only to such extent or in such amounts as are provided in advance in appropriation Acts" for "made only after the amount required for such subscription has been appropriated".

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date of 1981 Amendment

Amendment by Pub. L. 97–35 effective Aug. 13, 1981, except that any funds authorized to be appropriated shall not be available for use or obligation prior to Oct. 1, 1981, see section 1372 of Pub. L. 97–35, set out as an Effective Date note under section 290i of this title.

#### Effective Date

Section effective Oct. 3, 1977, except that no funds authorized to be appropriated by this section may be available for use or obligation prior to Oct. 1, 1977, see section 1001 of Pub. L. 95–118, set out as a note under section 282i of this title.