alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Order entered January 16, 2013

In The 

## Court of Appeals **Fifth District of Texas at Dallas**

No. 05
- 12
- 00520
- CR
HENRY ARNOLD , Appellant
V. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee On Appeal from the County Criminal Court No. 1 Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cau se No. MB09
- 31021


### O RDER
On November 14, 2012, the Court ordered the parties to file a written stipulation stating either: (1) the portion, if any, of the audio recording could be retrieved; and (2) whether the parties can agree to the content of that tr anscription; or (3) that no portion of the audio recording
can be retrieved. On December 13, 2012, we received a supplemental clerk’s record containing the parties’ stipulation that they “can reach no agreement regarding what the substantive and

accurate contents of any substituted Reporter’s Record would or would not show.”
We ORDER appellant to file his brief within THIRTY DAYS of the date of this order.

/s/ DAVID W. EVANS JUSTICE
### §285o. Expropriation of United States property; loan restrictions

The President shall instruct the United States Executive Director of the Asian Development Bank to vote against any loan or other utilization of the funds of the Bank for the benefit of any country which has—

(1) nationalized or expropriated or seized ownership or control of property owned by any United States citizen or by any corporation, partnership, or association not less than 50 per centum of which is beneficially owned by United States citizens;

(2) taken steps to repudiate or nullify existing contracts or agreements with any United States citizen or any corporation, partnership, or association not less than 50 per centum of which is beneficially owned by United States citizens; or

(3) imposed or enforced discriminatory taxes or other exaction, or restrictive maintenance or operational conditions, or has taken other actions, which have the effect of nationalizing, expropriating, or otherwise seizing ownership or control of property so owned;

unless the President determines that (A) an arrangement for prompt, adequate, and effective compensation has been made, (B) the parties have submitted the dispute to arbitration under the rules of the Convention for the Settlement of Investment Disputes, or (C) good faith negotiations are in progress aimed at providing prompt, adequate, and effective compensation under the applicable principles of international law.

(Pub. L. 89–369, §18, as added Pub. L. 92–245, §1, Mar. 10, 1972, 86 Stat. 58.)
Served: August 2, 2011 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA 

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 

OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY 

WASHINGTON, D.C.

Joint Application of 

AIR CANADA, THE AUSTRIAN GROUP, BRITISH MIDLAND AIRWAYS LTD., 

CONTINENTAL AIRLINES, INC., DEUTSCHE LUFTHANSA AG, POLSKIE LINIE 

LOTNICZE S.A., SCANDINAVIAN AIRLINES SYSTEM, SWISS INTERNATIONAL 

AIRLINES, LTD., TAP AIR PORTGUAL, AND UNITED AIR LINES, INC. 

under 49 U.S.C. §§ 41308-41309 

for approval of and antitrust immunity for alliance agreements 

Docket DOT-OST-2008-0234 

SCHEDULING NOTICE 

On April 21, 2011, the above-captioned members of the Star Alliance, together referred to as the 

“Joint Applicants,” submitted a joint motion1 asking the Department to recognize Brussels 

Airlines’ participation in the immunized alliance and joint venture. On April 29, the Department 

issued a notice and order that suspended the procedural schedule and provided access to certain 

confidential documents.2 The Department requested additional evidence from the Joint 

Applicants by Order 2011-6-15, to which the Joint Applicants responded on July 5, 2011. 

 

We have finished our initial review of the motion and all supporting materials submitted by the 

Joint Applicants. We find that the record is now substantially complete.3 Answers to the motion 

must be filed no later than 21 calendar days from the issue date of this Notice. Additionally, we 

will provide an opportunity for parties to reply to any answers that are filed. Replies are due no 

later than 7 business days after the last day for filing an answer. 

We will serve this Notice on all persons on the service list for this docket. 

 

 

1 See Joint Motion (April 21, 2011). 

2 See Notice and Order (April 29, 2011). 

3 We reserve the right to require the filing of additional information deemed relevant to the proceeding 

at any time. 
2

By: 

SUSAN L. KURLAND 

Assistant Secretary 

for Aviation and International Affairs 

Date: August 2, 2011 

(SEAL) 

An electronic version of this document is available at http://www.regulations.gov.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA No. DA 21
- 0009 CITY OF MISSOULA,

Plaintiff and Appellee, v. DELORISANN M. GIBSON,

Defendant and Appellant .

**ORDER** Upon consideration of Appellant’s motion for extension of time, and good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Appellant is granted an extension of time to and including May 21 , 2021 , within which to prepare, file, and serve Appellant’s opening brief on appeal.

Electronically signed by: Mike McGrath Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

April 16 2021

04/16/2021

Case Number: DA 21-0009
Editorial Note on Part 416
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 416 appear at 68 FR 53509, Sept. 11, 2003.

§ 416.993 Medical evidence in continuing disability review cases. ( a ) *General.* If you are entitled to benefits because you are disabled, we will have your case file with the supporting medical evidence previously used to establish or continue your entitlement. Generally, therefore, the medical evidence we will need for a continuing disability review will be that required to make a current determination or decision as to whether you are still disabled, as defined under the medical improvement review standard. See §§ 416.987 and 416.994.
( b ) *Obtaining evidence from your medical sources.* You must provide us with reports from your physician, psychologist, or others who have treated or evaluated you, as well as any other evidence that will help us determine if you are still disabled. See § 416.912. You must have a good reason for not giving us this information or we may find that your disability has ended. See § 416.994(e)(2). If we ask you, you must contact your medical sources to help us get the medical reports. We will make every reasonable effort to help you in getting medical reports when you give us permission to request them from your physician, psychologist, or other medical sources. See § 416.912(b)(1)(i) concerning what we mean by every reasonable effort. In some instances, such as when a source is known to be unable to provide certain tests or procedures or is known to be nonproductive or uncooperative, we may order a consultative examination while awaiting receipt of medical source evidence. See § 416.912(b)(1)(ii). See § 416.912(c).
( c ) *When we will purchase a consultative examination.* A consultative examination may be purchased when we need additional evidence to determine whether or not your disability continues. As a result, we may ask you, upon our request and reasonable notice, to undergo consultative examinations and tests to help us determine if you are still disabled. See § 416.917. We will decide whether or not to purchase a consultative examination in accordance with the standards in §§ 416.919a through 416.919b.
[56 FR 36970, Aug. 1, 1991, as amended at 65 FR 16815, Mar. 30, 2000; 82 FR 5882, Jan. 18, 2017]
```

[Congressional Bills 114th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 4291 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

114th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 4291

 To provide for additional security requirements for Syrian and Iraqi 
                   refugees, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           December 18, 2015

Mr. Calvert (for himself, Mr. Hunter, Mr. Knight, and Mr. Rohrabacher) 
 introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on 
                             the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To provide for additional security requirements for Syrian and Iraqi 
                   refugees, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Secure Accountability for Emigres 
and Refugees Act of 2015'' or the ``SAFER Act of 2015''.

SEC. 2. SECURITY REQUIREMENTS FOR SYRIAN AND IRAQI REFUGEES.

    (a) In General.--Prior to admitting to the United States as a 
refugee under section 207 of the Immigration and Nationality Act (8 
U.S.C. 1157) a covered alien, the Secretary of Homeland Security, in 
coordination with the Director of the Federal Bureau of Investigation 
and the Director of National Intelligence, shall ensure that the 
covered alien--
            (1) has taken and passed a lie detector test, as determined 
        by the Secretary;
            (2) has submitted to the Secretary biometric identification 
        information, including DNA, which the Secretary has compared 
        against all relevant databases and determined that the covered 
        alien has no known history of engaging in terrorist activity 
        (as such term is defined in section 212(a)(3)(B)(iv) of the 
        Immigration and Nationality Act (8 U.S.C. 1182(a)(3)(B)(iv))); 
        and
            (3) does not pose a threat to the national security of the 
        United States based on a background check that the Secretary 
        conducts, which includes a review of the covered alien's 
        interactions on and posting of material to the Internet 
        (including social media services), and for purposes of which, 
        the alien has submitted to the Secretary such information as 
        the Secretary determines necessary.
    (b) Covered Alien.--The term ``covered alien'' means an alien 
applying for admission to the United States as a refugee who--
            (1) is a national of Iraq or Syria;
            (2) has no nationality and whose last habitual residence 
        was in Iraq or Syria; or
            (3) has been present in Iraq or Syria at any time on or 
        after March 1, 2011.
    (c) Sunset.--This Act shall cease to have effect on the date that 
is 10 years after the date of the enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
T hi s di s pos i t i on i s notappr opr i a t e f orpubl i c a t i on and i s notpr e c e de nt * e xc e pta s pr ovi de d by9th C i r . R . 36- 3.

T he pa ne l una ni m ous l yc onc l ude s thi s c a s e i s s ui t abl e f orde c i s i on ** w ith o u t o r a l a r g u m e n t. See F ed. R . A pp . P . 34 (a )( 2). NOT F OR P UB L I CAT I ON UN I TE D STATE S C OU RT OF APPE ALS FOR T HE NI NTH CI RC UI T E L I E Z ARAB E L L A, a . k . a . E l i e z a rA. A b e lla , a .k .a . B e rt, P et i t i on er , v. E R I C H . H O L D E R , J r ., A tto rn e yG e n e r a l, R e s p o n d e n t. N o. 10- 71500 A ge nc yN o. A 036- 147- 858 ME MOR AN DU M *

O n P e t i t i on f

orR e vi e w of

a n O r de rof

the B o a r do f I m m ig r a tio n A p p e a ls S ubm i tt e d J ul y17, 2012 ** B efo re: S C H R O E D E R , T H O M A S , an dS IL V E R M A N , C i rcu i tJu d g es. E l i e z a rA be l l a , ana t i ve a nd c i t i z e n of the P hi l i ppi ne s , pe t i t i ons f orr e vi e w of the B oard of Im m i grat i on A pp ea l s’ (“ B IA ”) order di sm i ss i ng hi s app ea l fr om an im m ig r a tio n ju d g e ’s r e m o v a l o r d e r . W e h a v e ju r is d ic tio n u n d e r8 U .S .C . § 1 2 5 2 . 

# FI LED JU L 25 2012 M OLLY C. DW Y ER, CLERK U . S. C O U R T OF APPE ALS10- 71500 2 W e r e v ie w d e n o v o q u e s tio n s o f la w . V arga s-H erna ndezv. G on zales , 497 F . 3d 9 1 9 , 9 2 1 ( 9 th C i r . 2 0 0 7 ) . We d e n yi n p a rta n dg r a n ti n p a rtth e p e t i t i o n f o rr e v i e w, an drem an dfo r fu rth er p ro ceed i n g s. T he B I A c orr e c t l yc onc l ude d tha tthe a m e nde d a ggr a va t e d f e l onyde f

i ni t i on s e tf orth i n the I l l e ga l I m m i gr a t i on R e f orm a nd I m m i gr antR e s pons i bi l i tyA c tof 1 9 9 6 , P u b . L . N o . 1 0 4 -2 0 8 (“II R IR A ”) , ap p li es re tro ac ti v ely to re n d erA b ella’s c o n v ic tio n u n d e rC a lif

o rn iaP e n a l C o d e § 1 9 2 ( a ) a n a g g r av a te df e lo n y . See A lvarez- B araj as v. G on zales , 4 1 8 F. 3 d1 0 5 0 , 1 0 5 4 ( 9 th Ci r . 2 0 0 5 ) ( I I RI RA de f i ni t i on appl i e s r e tr oa c t i ve l y ) . A be l l a ’ s c ont e nt i on tha tr e tr oa c t i ve appl i c a t i on of I I R I R A vi ol a t e s hi s r i ght s t o due pr oc e s s a nd e qua l pr ot e c t i on i s unpe r s ua s i ve , a nd hi s c ont e nt i on tha ti tvi ol a t e s the pr ohi bi t i ons a ga i ns te x pos tf a c t o l a w s a nd bi l l s of att ai n d er i s fo recl o sed b y Ar tu ko v i c v . I NS , 69 3 F . 2d 89 4, 89 7 (9th C i r. 19 82 ). I n l i ghtof

the S upr e m e C ourt ’ s de c i s i on i n Judu lan g v. H older , 1 3 2 S . C t. 4 7 6 , 4 8 4 ( 2 0 1 1 ) , h o w e v e r , w e g r a n t th e p e titio n f o rr e v ie w in p a rt a n dr e m a n dto the B I A t o r e a s s e s s A be l l a ’ s e l i gi bi l i tyf orr e l i e f unde rf orm e r§ 212( c ) of

the I m m ig r a tio n a n dN a tio n a lityA c t. E a c h p a rtys h a l l b e a ri t s o wn c o s t s f o rth i s p e t i t i o n f

o rr e v i e w. P E T IT IO N F O R R E V IE W D E N IE D i n p art; G R A N T E D i n p art; RE MAND E D.
### §1622f. Administrative support and services to Foreign Claims Settlement Commission of the United States by Attorney General

The Attorney General shall provide necessary administrative support and services to the Commission. The Chairman shall prepare the budget requests, authorization documents, and legislative proposals for the Commission within the procedures established by the Department of Justice, and the Attorney General shall submit these items to the Director of the Office of Management and Budget as proposed by the Chairman.

(Pub. L. 96–209, title I, §106, Mar. 14, 1980, 94 Stat. 97.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section was not enacted as part of the International Claims Settlement Act of 1949 which comprises this chapter.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date

Section effective Mar. 14, 1980, see title VI of Pub. L. 96–209, set out as a note under section 1622a of this title.
1 All section references are to the Internal Revenue Code

applicable to the years in issue, and all Rule references are to

the Tax Court Rules of Practice and Procedure.

T.C. Memo. 2008-109

UNITED STATES TAX COURT

DANIEL PIERCE, Petitioner v.

COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, Respondent

Docket No. 13737-06. Filed April 22, 2008.

Daniel Pierce, pro se.

Jeffrey S. Luechtefeld and Melinda G. Williams, for

respondent.

MEMORANDUM OPINION

SWIFT, Judge: This matter is before us on respondent’s

motion for judgment on the pleadings.1
- 2 -

Background

Petitioner did not file Federal income tax returns for 2001,

2002, 2003, or 2004. 

Under section 6020(b) and on the basis of information

provided to respondent by third parties relating to payments made

to petitioner, respondent prepared substitute tax returns for

petitioner and determined against petitioner the tax deficiencies

and additions to tax set forth below.

 Additions to Tax 

 Sec. Sec. Sec. Sec.

Year Deficiency 6651(a)(1) 6651(a)(2) 6651(f) 6654

2001 $21,424 $4,820 

1 --- $856

2002 21,129 4,754 1 $706 ---

2003 12,687 2,855 1 332 ---

2004 12,904 2,903 1 375 ---

1 To be calculated in accordance with sec. 6651.

Respondent also determined against petitioner a selfemployment tax liability on the basis of payments petitioner

received for work as a janitor. 

On July 17, 2006, in response to respondent’s notice of

deficiency, petitioner filed a petition containing only taxprotester arguments. By court order of November 1, 2006,

petitioner’s tax-protester arguments were stricken from the

petition.
- 3 -

Discussion

After the above November 1, 2006, Court order, the only

viable remaining issue before the Court is respondent’s

determination of the section 6651(f) addition to tax for

fraudulent failure to file tax returns, and with the filing of

the instant motion for judgment on the pleadings, respondent

concedes for each year the section 6651(f) addition to tax for

fraud. 

However, in opposing respondent’s motion for judgment on the

pleadings and at a hearing that was held on February 13, 2008, in

Tampa, Florida, petitioner again raises only tax-protester

arguments.

We may grant judgment on the pleadings where the pleadings

do not raise genuine issues of material fact or law. 

Rule 120(a); Nis Family Trust v. Commissioner, 115 T.C. 523, 537

(2000); Karkabe v. Commissioner, T.C. Memo. 2007-115. 

Petitioner raises only tax-protester arguments, each of

which has been stricken, and respondent now concedes for each

year the addition to tax for fraud.

For the reasons stated, we shall grant respondent’s motion

for judgment on the pleadings as to the tax deficiency for each

year, and the tax deficiency sustained for each year satisfies

respondent’s burden of production under section 7491(c) with

regard to the section 6651(a)(1) and (2) additions to tax and the
- 4 -

section 6654 addition to tax. Respondent’s determination of

additional self-employment taxes due on payments petitioner

received for janitorial work also is sustained. Sec. 1401.

To reflect the foregoing,

An appropriate order and

decision will be entered.
Electrical Conductivity, UMHOS WATER TEMPERATURE, DEG DISSOLVED OXYZEN, PPM

Day High Low Mean High Low Mean High Low Mean

1 105 99 103 58.0 55.3 56.7 10.3 8.9 9.6

2 107 90 100 60.1 55.0 57.6 10.3 5.6 8.7

3 108 88 97 58.5 52.8 54.5 11.3 5.3 9.5

4 98 93 94 53.4 52.0 52.7 11.6 11.3 11.4

5 101 96 98 53.9 52.1 53.1 11.6 11.4 11.5

6 101 97 99 55.4 52.9 54.0 11.5 10.3 11.1

7 100 96 97 55.1 54.2 54.5 11.3 10.7 11.1

8 105 94 97 59.3 53.2 55.5 11.2 8.1 10.6

9 109 104 106 64.9 57.9 60.6 9.1 5.8 7.8

10 105 102 104 67.0 58.3 62.0 8.5 5.1 6.8

11 0 0 0 66.9 62.2 64.6 4.9 0.0 3.5

12 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0

13 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0

14 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0

15 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0

16 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0

17 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0

18 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0

19 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0

20 0 0 0 61.4 58.5 60.2 10.2 9.1 9.5

21 0 0 0 60.0 55.0 57.4 10.9 10.3 10.6

22 83 78 80 70.5 59.3 65.2 10.4 5.8 7.8

23 90 83 86 71.4 56.3 67.0 10.5 3.3 5.0

24 84 80 82 63.9 56.0 59.7 10.7 9.2 10.2

25 85 81 83 70.7 61.0 65.1 9.2 6.5 7.8

26 85 81 83 71.2 62.3 66.3 7.3 5.9 6.7

27 89 74 84 75.3 58.7 68.1 10.3 4.7 6.2

28 80 77 78 58.7 55.7 57.4 10.7 10.3 10.5

29 78 76 77 57.9 55.4 56.6 10.6 10.3 10.5

30 78 76 77 57.5 55.3 56.3 10.6 10.3 10.5

COMMENT(S):

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

Historical Archive and Report Database

Ripon on the Stanislaus River Water Quality

Period: April 2023 Run Date: 5/9/2023
#### § 368.3 Vending machines.

The sale of tobacco products in vending machines is prohibited in or around Federal property occupied and maintained by the Railroad Retirement Board.
§ 423.3 Other process directed to the Social Security Administration or the Commissioner. Subpoenas and other process (other than summonses and complaints) that are required to be served on the Social Security Administration or the Commissioner of Social Security in the Commissioner's official capacity should be served as follows: ( a ) If authorized by law to be served by mail, any mailed process should be sent to the Office of the General Counsel, Social Security Administration, 6401 Security Boulevard, Baltimore, MD 21235.
( b ) If served by an individual, the process should be delivered to the Office of the General Counsel, via the agency mail room at Social Security Administration, 6401 Security Boulevard, Baltimore, MD 21235.
[88 FR 1330, Jan. 10, 2023]
I 

114TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 404 

To authorize early repayment of obligations to the Bureau of Reclamation 

within the Northport Irrigation District in the State of Nebraska. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JANUARY 16, 2015 

Mr. SMITH of Nebraska introduced the following bill; which was referred to 

the Committee on Natural Resources 

A BILL 

To authorize early repayment of obligations to the Bureau 

of Reclamation within the Northport Irrigation District 

in the State of Nebraska. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. EARLY REPAYMENT OF CONSTRUCTION COSTS. 

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Notwithstanding section 213 of 

5 the Reclamation Reform Act of 1982 (43 U.S.C. 390mm), 

6 any landowner within the Northport Irrigation District in 

7 the State of Nebraska (referred to in this section as the 

8 ‘‘District’’) may repay, at any time, the construction costs 

9 of project facilities allocated to the landowner’s land with10 in the District. 


tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 404 IH

1 (b) APPLICABILITY OF FULL-COST PRICING LIMITA2 TIONS.—On discharge, in full, of the obligation for repay3 ment of all construction costs described in subsection (a) 

4 that are allocated to all land the landowner owns in the 

5 District in question, the parcels of land shall not be sub6 ject to the ownership and full-cost pricing limitations 

7 under Federal reclamation law (the Act of June 17, 1902, 

8 32 Stat. 388, chapter 1093), and Acts supplemental to 

9 and amendatory of that Act (43 U.S.C. 371 et seq.), in10 cluding the Reclamation Reform Act of 1982 (13 U.S.C. 

11 390aa et seq.). 

12 (c) CERTIFICATION.—On request of a landowner that 

13 has repaid, in full, the construction costs described in sub14 section (a), the Secretary of the Interior shall provide to 

15 the landowner a certificate described in section 213(b)(1) 

16 of the Reclamation Reform Act of 1982 (43 U.S.C. 

17 390mm(b)(1)). 

18 (d) EFFECT.—Nothing in this section— 

19 (1) modifies any contractual rights under, or 

20 amends or reopens, the reclamation contract between 

21 the District and the United States; or 

22 (2) modifies any rights, obligations, or relation23 ships between the District and landowners in the 

24 District under Nebraska State law. 

Æ 


tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
### §285bb. Additional contribution to special funds

#### (a) Contribution authority

#### (1) In general

The United States Governor of the Bank may contribute on behalf of the United States an amount equal to the amount appropriated under subsection (b), pursuant to the resolution of the Bank entitled "Seventh Replenishment of the Asian Development Fund".

#### (2) Subject to appropriations

Any commitment to make the contribution authorized by paragraph (1) shall be effective only to such extent or in such amounts as are provided in advance in appropriations Acts.

#### (b) Limitations on authorization of appropriations

For the contribution authorized by subsection (a), there are authorized to be appropriated such sums as may be necessary for payment by the Secretary of the Treasury, without fiscal year limitation.

(Pub. L. 89–369, §31, as added Pub. L. 108–199, div. D, title V, §582, Jan. 23, 2004, 118 Stat. 204.)