alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from Century
Properties Fund XX 1996 Third Quarter 10-QSB and is qualified in its entirety by
reference to such 10-QSB filing.
</LEGEND>
<CIK> 0000736909
<NAME> CENTURY PROPERTIES FUND XX
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1996
<CASH>                                           6,284
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0<F1>
<PP&E>                                          48,653
<DEPRECIATION>                                  15,941
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  40,737
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0<F1>
<BONDS>                                         31,386
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                     (6,782)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    40,737
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 5,568
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 6,838
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               1,881
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                      0
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (1,270)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  (20.13)<F2>
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
<FN>
<F1>Registrant has an unclassified balance sheet.
<F2>Multiplier is 1.
</FN>
        

</TABLE>
**UN PUBLISHED** 
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

**No. 12**  **- 8111** 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA , Plaintiff

- Appellee ,
v. DAMON EMANUEL ELLIOTT , Defendant

- Appellant
.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland , at Greenbelt
. Peter J. Messitte , Senior District Judge. ( 8:97

- cr - 00053

- PJM

- 1; 8:12

- cv - 03289

- PJM )

Submitted : February 21, 201 3 Decided: February 26, 2013

Before AGEE and DAVIS , Circuit Judges , and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge
.
Dismissed by un published per curiam opinion
.
Damon Emanuel Elliott , Appellant Pro Se. Ronald Jay Tenpas , OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Greenbelt, Maryland , for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit
.2 PER CURIAM: Damon Emanuel Elliott seeks to appeal the district court’s order dismissing as successive his 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West Supp. 2012) motion. The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1)(B) (2006). A certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2006). When the district court denies relief on the merits, a prisoner satis fies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that the district court’s assessment of the constitutional claims is debatable or wrong. Slack v. McDaniel , 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000); see Miller

– El v. Cockrell , 537 U.S. 322, 336

– 38 (20 03). When the district court denies relief on procedural grounds, the prisoner must demonstrate both that the dispositive procedural ruling is debatable, and that the motion states a debatable claim of the denial of a constitutional right. Slack , 529 U.S . at 484

– 85. We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Elliott has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal con tentions are adequately presented in the materials3 before this court and argument would not aid the decisional
process. DISMISS ED
**Exhibit32.2**

 

Certification of PrincipalFinancial Officer

Pursuant to

Section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. 1350)

 

In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K/Afor the year ended December 31, 2005 (the “Report”) of Federal ServicesAcquisition Corporation (the “Registrant”), as filed with the Securities andExchange Commission on the date hereof, I, Peter M. Schulte, President andChief Financial Officer of the Registrant, hereby certify that:

 

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirementsof Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended;and

 

(2) The information contained in the Report fairlypresents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results ofoperations of the Registrant.

 

 
| Date:  December 5, 2006 | By:    | /s/    Peter M. Schulte     |   |
|------------------------------|--------|---------------------------------------------------------------------|--------|
|                         |   | **Peter M. Schulte**                                                |
|                         |   | **President and Chief Financial Officer**                           |
|                         |   | ** **                                                          |
|                         |   | **(Principal Financial Officer)**                                   |

 

----
### §284e. Payment of subscription to Association by United States

#### (a) Authorization of appropriations for subscription

There is hereby authorized to be appropriated, without fiscal year limitation, for the subscription of the United States to the Association, $320,290,000.

#### (b) Increase in Association resources; contribution; authorization of appropriations

The United States Governor is hereby authorized (1) to vote for an increase in the resources of the Association and (2) to agree on behalf of the United States to contribute to the Association the sum of $312 million, both as recommended by the Executive Directors, in a report dated September 9, 1963, to the Board of Governors of the Association. There is hereby authorized to be appropriated out of funds supplied by the Nation's taxpayers or out of funds borrowed on their credit, without fiscal year limitations, $312 million to provide the United States share of the increase in the resources of the Association.

#### (c) Issuance of special notes

For the purpose of keeping to a minimum the cost to the United States of participation in the Association, the Secretary of the Treasury is authorized and directed to issue special notes of the United States from time to time, at par, and to deliver such notes to the Association in exchange for dollars to the extent permitted by the articles. The special notes provided for in this subsection shall be issued under the authority and subject to the provisions of chapter 31 of title 31, and the purposes for which securities may be issued under that chapter are extended to include the purposes for which special notes are authorized and directed to be issued under this subsection, but such notes shall bear no interest, shall be nonnegotiable, and shall be payable on demand of the Association. The face amount of special notes issued to the Association under the authority of this subsection and outstanding at any one time shall not exceed, in the aggregate, the amount actually paid to the Association under the articles.

#### (d) Income covered into Treasury

Any payment made to the United States by the Association as a distribution of net income shall be covered into the Treasury as a miscellaneous receipt.

(Pub. L. 86–565, §7, June 30, 1960, 74 Stat. 294; Pub. L. 88–310, §§1, 2, May 26, 1964, 78 Stat. 200.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

In subsec. (c), "chapter 31 of title 31" and "that chapter" substituted for "the Second Liberty Bond Act, as amended" and "that Act", respectively, on authority of Pub. L. 97–258, §4(b), Sept. 13, 1982, 96 Stat. 1067, the first section of which enacted Title 31, Money and Finance.

#### Amendments

1964—Subsecs. (b) to (d). Pub. L. 88–310 added subsec. (b), redesignated former subsec. (b) as (c) and struck out ", after paying the requisite part of the subscription of the United States in the Association required to be made under the articles." after "Secretary of the Treasury" in first sentence and "of the subscription of the United States" after "amount" in third sentence, respectively, and redesignated former subsec. (c) as (d).
1 

### Troutman, Jake (FAA)

From: Troutman, Jake (FAA)

Sent: Thursday, February 12, 2015 12:09 PM

To: 'charles.lande@nee.com'

Cc: Pappas, Rob (FAA)

Subject: Request for Additional Informatio n - NextEra Energy, Inc. [FAA-2014-0633]

Dear Mr. Charles Lande:

This letter is to inform you that the following information is missing from your petition (Docket No. FAA

‐ 2014

‐ 0633). This information is necessary for the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) to process your petition.

• Describe the aircraft make(s) and model(s) for the proposed UAS operation. The description(s) should include

the following: size, maximum weight (including payload), aircraft performance limitations, and aircraft type (i.e.

‐ fixed

‐ wing,rotorcraft, lighter

‐ than

‐ air). This information can be located in the aircraft manual(s).

• Provide information regarding the radio frequency spectrum(s). This information can be located in the aircraft

manual(s).

• Provide a description of the proposed pilot medical requirements.

• Your petition references a pre

‐ flight safety checklist Describe the process used to determine if the UAS is

airworthy and in safe condition for operation in the NAS.

• Your petition references the material listed below, however the material was not submitted for the

record. Please provide a copy of the following referenced material:

o manufacturer's user guide (Ref. pg. #10 petition and Appendix A pg. #3)

• Please provide a flight operations manual (FOM) or similar guidance to be provided to UAS crews that, for

example, govern maximum altitudes and speeds, minimum flight visibility, distances from clouds, requirements and

procedures for using visual observers, and other requirements determined by NextEra to ensure the safety of UAS

operations.

Please submit the additional information (non

‐ proprietary) to your docket at www.regulations.gov and submit any

proprietary information to the FAA Headquarters or electronically via e

‐ mail to 333exemptions@faa.gov

. If you want us

to process your request any further, we must receive the information described above by 2/26/2015. If we do not

receive the information, we will close the docket without notifying you further.

If you have any questions, please feel free to contact me at (202) 267

‐ 9521.

Sincerely,

Jake J Troutman

Program Analyst | Rulemaking

FAA Office of Aviation Safety

Airmen and Airspace Rules Division

202

‐ 267

‐ 9521
Docket Number: FAA-2012-0930
Table 3.4U. Personal Current Tax Receipts 

[Millions of dollars; quarters seasonally adjusted at annual rates] 

 

Bureau of Economic Analysis

Downloaded on 5/27/2011 At 2:17:50 PM Last Revised May 27, 2011 

1 2 3 4 5 6

 Line 2009-I 2009-II 2009-III 2009-IV 2010-I 

1 Personal current taxes\1\ 1213415 1112459 1116996 1117230 1134699

2 Federal 912832 847740 826968 823424 843232

3 Income taxes 912832 847740 826968 823424 843232

4 Withheld 868632 823440 816572 820540 837908

5 Declarations and settlements 319840 299940 286036 278524 256628

6 Less: Refunds 275640 275640 275640 275640 251304

7 Other taxes 0 0 0 0 0

8 State and local 300583 264719 290028 293806 291467

9 Income taxes 272799 236755 261823 264951 262520

10 Motor vehicle licenses 15172 15285 15390 15977 15942

11 Property taxes 7249 7339 7405 7447 7549

12 Other taxes\2\ 5363 5340 5410 5431 5456

1. Excludes estate and gift taxes, which are classified in the NIPAs as capital 

 transfers.

2. Consists largely of hunting, fishing, and other personal licenses.
7 8 9

 2010-II 2010-III 2010-IV 

1149124 1178199 1203180

868504 886368 900208

868504 886368 900208

864244 882696 895172

255564 254976 256340

251304 251304 251304

0 0 0

280620 291831 302972

251258 262860 273822

16161 15651 15540

7664 7798 7908

5537 5522 5702
MEMORANDUM

DATE: 11/21/14

FROM: Ken Mitchell/EPA Region 4

TO: Clean Power Plan for Existing Power Plants; Docket Id: OAR–2013-0602

SUBJECT: Discussion of the Clean Power Plan with EPA Region 4 State and Local Energy and 

Environmental Agencies

SUMMARY: 

EPA Region 4 provided information on the Clean Power Plan to EPA Region 4 State and Local

Energy and Environmental Agencies on 7/14/14 (West Virginia officials also participated). The Clean 

Power Plan for Existing Power Plants was proposed on June 2, 2014.

ATTENDEES:

EPA

Beverly Banister/EPA R4

Keith Goff/EPA R4

Other EPA R4 staff

Joe Goffman/OAR HQ

Other EPA OAR HQ staff

External Stakeholders

Approximately 28 State and Local Energy and Environmental Agency staff

ATTACHMENT
Advance Questions for Discussion of the Clean Power Plan with EPA Region 4 State, Local, and 

Tribal Energy and Environmental Agencies on 7/14/14

1. Dispatch is currently set by complex economic algorithms developed by the utilities. What 

regulatory mechanism does EPA anticipate states using to require utilities to switch to an 

environmental dispatch?

2. Does EPA have a planned approach for dealing with a major disruption in the energy markets? Same 

question for an unexpected shutdown of a nuclear plant?

3. Why is Georgia being asked to reduce emissions by 48%, when other states’s reduction targets are 

significantly smaller (e.g. less than 20%)?
128 STAT. 2094 PUBLIC LAW 113–221—DEC. 16, 2014 

LEGISLATIVE HISTORY—H.R. 4812: 

HOUSE REPORTS: No. 113–516 (Comm. on Homeland Security). 

CONGRESSIONAL RECORD, Vol. 160 (2014): 

July 22, considered and passed House. 

Dec. 4, considered and passed Senate. 

Æ 

Public Law 113–221 

113th Congress 

An Act 

To amend title 49, United States Code, to require the Administrator of the Transportation Security Administration to establish a process for providing expedited 

and dignified passenger screening services for veterans traveling to visit war 

memorials built and dedicated to honor their service, and for other purposes. 

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of 

the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Honor Flight Act’’. 

SEC. 2. HONOR FLIGHT PROGRAM. 

(a) IN GENERAL.—Title 49, United States Code, is amended 

by adding after section 44927 the following new section: 

‘‘§ 44928. Honor Flight program 

‘‘The Administrator of the Transportation Security Administration shall establish, in collaboration with the Honor Flight Network 

or other not-for-profit organization that honors veterans, a process 

for providing expedited and dignified passenger screening services 

for veterans traveling on an Honor Flight Network private charter, 

or such other not-for-profit organization that honors veterans, to 

visit war memorials built and dedicated to honor the service of 

such veterans.’’. 

(b) CLERICAL AMENDMENT.—The table of contents of title 49, 

United States Code, is amended by inserting after the item relating 

to section 44927 the following new item: 

‘‘44928. Honor Flight program.’’. 

Approved December 16, 2014. 

49 USC 44928. 

49 USC 40101 

note. 

Honor Flight Act. 

Dec. 16, 2014 

[H.R. 4812] 


dkrause on DSKHT7XVN1PROD with PUBLAWS
```

[Congressional Bills 114th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 4219 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

114th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 4219

To authorize the extension of nondiscriminatory treatment (normal trade 
          relations treatment) to the products of Kazakhstan.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           December 10, 2015

Mr. Boustany (for himself and Mr. Meeks) introduced the following bill; 
         which was referred to the Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To authorize the extension of nondiscriminatory treatment (normal trade 
          relations treatment) to the products of Kazakhstan.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. FINDINGS.

    Congress finds the following:
            (1) Kazakhstan allows its citizens the right and 
        opportunity to emigrate, free of any heavy tax on emigration or 
        on the visas or other documents required for emigration and 
        free of any tax, levy, fine, fee, or other charge on any 
        citizens as a consequence of the desire of those citizens to 
        emigrate to the country of their choice.
            (2) Kazakhstan has been found to be in full compliance with 
        the freedom of emigration requirements under title IV of the 
        Trade Act of 1974 (19 U.S.C. 2431 et seq.) since 1994.
            (3) Kazakhstan has received normal trade relations 
        treatment since concluding a bilateral trade agreement with the 
        United States that entered into force in 1992.
            (4) On July 27, 2015, the Ministerial Conference of the 
        World Trade Organization invited Kazakhstan to accede to the 
        World Trade Organization.

SEC. 2. TERMINATION OF APPLICATION OF TITLE IV OF THE TRADE ACT OF 1974 
              TO THE PRODUCTS OF KAZAKHSTAN.

    (a) Presidential Determinations and Extension of Nondiscriminatory 
Treatment.--Notwithstanding any provision of title IV of the Trade Act 
of 1974 (19 U.S.C. 2431 et seq.), the President may--
            (1) determine that such title should no longer apply to 
        Kazakhstan; and
            (2) after making a determination under paragraph (1) with 
        respect to Kazakhstan, proclaim the extension of 
        nondiscriminatory treatment (normal trade relations treatment) 
        to the products of Kazakhstan.
    (b) Termination of Applicability of Title IV.--On and after the 
date on which the President extends nondiscriminatory treatment to the 
products of Kazakhstan pursuant to subsection (a), title IV of the 
Trade Act of 1974 (19 U.S.C. 2431 et seq.) shall cease to apply to 
Kazakhstan.
                                 <all>
```
Editorial Note on Part 416
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 416 appear at 68 FR 53509, Sept. 11, 2003.

§ 416.714 When reports are due. ( a ) *A reportable event happens.* You should report to us as soon as an event listed in § 416.708 happens. If you do not report within 10 days after the close of the month in which the event happens, your report will be late. We may impose a penalty deduction from your benefits for a late report (see §§ 416.722 through 416.732).
( b ) *We request a report.* We may request a report from you if we need information to determine continuing eligibility or the correct amount of your SSI benefit payments. If you do not report within 30 days of our written request, we may determine that you are ineligible to receive SSI benefits. We will suspend your benefits effective with the month following the month in which we determine that you are ineligible to receive SSI benefits because of your failure to give us necessary information.
[46 FR 5873, Jan. 21, 1981, as amended at 50 FR 48573, Nov. 26, 1985]
### Part B—Efficiency Records
### §2291b. Prohibition on use of foreign assistance for reimbursements for drug crop eradications

Funds made available to carry out this chapter may not be used to reimburse persons whose illicit drug crops are eradicated.

(Pub. L. 87–195, pt. I, §483, as added Pub. L. 99–83, title VI, §609, Aug. 8, 1985, 99 Stat. 230.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

This chapter, referred to in text, was in the original "this Act", meaning Pub. L. 87–195, Sept. 4, 1961, 75 Stat. 424, known as the Foreign Assistance Act of 1961. For complete classification of this Act to the Code, see Short Title note set out under section 2151 of this title and Tables.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date

Section effective Oct. 1, 1985, see section 1301 of Pub. L. 99–83, set out as an Effective Date of 1985 Amendment note under section 2151–1 of this title.
###### Editorial Note on Part 416

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 416 appear at 68 FR 53509, Sept. 11, 2003.

#### § 416.919j Objections to the medical source designated to perform the consultative examination.

You or your representative may object to your being examined by a medical source we have designated to perform a consultative examination. If there is a good reason for the objection, we will schedule the examination with another medical source. A good reason may be that the medical source we designated had previously represented an interest adverse to you. For example, the medical source may have represented your employer in a workers' compensation case or may have been involved in an insurance claim or legal action adverse to you. Other things we will consider include: The presence of a language barrier, the medical source's office location (e.g., 2nd floor, no elevator), travel restrictions, and whether the medical source had examined you in connection with a previous disability determination or decision that was unfavorable to you. If your objection is that a medical source allegedly “lacks objectivity” in general, but not in relation to you personally, we will review the allegations. See § 416.919s. To avoid a delay in processing your claim, the consultative examination in your case will be changed to another medical source while a review is being conducted. We will handle any objection to use of the substitute medical source in the same manner. However, if we had previously conducted such a review and found that the reports of the medical source in question conformed to our guidelines, we will not change your examination.

[65 FR 11879, Mar. 7, 2000]
# C_2012127EN.01000501.xml

| 1.5.2012 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 127/5 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

1.5.2012

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 127/5

---

Corrigendum to the notice of initiation of an anti-subsidy proceeding concerning imports of bicycles originating in the People’s Republic of China

(
  Official Journal of the European Union C 122 of 27 April 2012
  )

Official Journal of the European Union C 122 of 27 April 2012

2012/C 127/05

On page 15, Annex A, point 5 ‘Information related to loans’:

for:

‘By providing the above information, the company agrees to its possible inclusion in the sample. If the company is selected to be part of the sample, this will involve completing a questionnaire and accepting a visit at its premises in order to verify its response. If the company indicates that it does not agree to its possible inclusion in the sample, it will be deemed to have not cooperated in the investigation. The Commission’s findings for non-cooperating exporting producers are based on facts available and the result may be less favourable to that company than if it had cooperated.’,

read:

‘Please provide a full list of banks which have provided your company with loans that are not yet fully repaid at the end of the investigation period. Indicate which, if any, of these banks are state-owned (directly or indirectly) and provide the percentage (share) of state ownership.’.

---