alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 31.2

                    CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
               UNDER SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Richard F. Gavino, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Warrantech Corporation;

2. Based on my  knowledge,  this  Quarterly  Report  does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact  necessary to make
the statements made, in light of the  circumstances  under which such statements
were made, not  misleading  with respect to the period covered by this Quarterly
Report;

3.  Based  on my  knowledge,  the  financial  statements,  and  other  financial
information  included in this Quarterly  Report,  fairly present in all material
respects the financial  condition,  results of operations  and cash flows of the
registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this Quarterly Report;

4.  The  registrant's  other  certifying  officers  and  I are  responsible  for
establishing and maintaining  disclosure  controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and we have:

         (a) designed  such  disclosure  controls and  procedures to ensure that
material  information  relating to the  registrant,  including its  consolidated
subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities,  particularly
during the period in which this Quarterly Report is being prepared;

         (b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls
and  procedures  as of a date  within 90 days prior to the  filing  date of this
Quarterly Report (the "Evaluation Date"); and

         (c)  presented  in this  quarterly  report  our  conclusions  about the
effectiveness of the disclosure  controls and procedures based on our evaluation
as of the Evaluation Date;

5. The registrant's other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our
most recent evaluation,  to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of
registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):

         (a) all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal
controls  which  could  adversely  affect  the  registrant's  ability to record,
process,  summarize  and  report  financial  data  and have  identified  for the
registrant's auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and

         (b) any fraud,  whether or not material,  that  involves  management or
other  employees  who  have a  significant  role  in the  registrant's  internal
controls.


Date:  February 12, 2004                 /s/ Richard F. Gavino
                                         ---------------------
                                         Executive Vice President, Treasurer and
                                         Chief Financial Officer





                                       23
#### Iroquois Brewing Company, Appellant, v. The Thomas Cusack Company, Respondent. (Action No. 15,423.)

Judgment of Supreme Court and judgment of City Court reversed and new trial ordered, to be had in the City Court on the 8th day of April, 1914, at ten A. M., with costs in all courts to appellant to abide event. Held, that painting advertising signs upon the walls of plaintiff’s building, though by license from plaintiff’s tenant, may cause damage to the building in the nature of waste, provided the damage is not trivial but substantial. Defendant may be held liable under section 1651 of the Code of Civil Procedure, as assignee of the tenant. All concurred.
### §1644k. Authorization of appropriations

There are hereby authorized to be appropriated such sums as may be necessary to enable the Commission and the Treasury Department of 1 pay their respective administrative expenses incurred in carrying out their functions under this subchapter.

(Mar. 10, 1950, ch. 54, title VI, §611, as added Pub. L. 94–542, Oct. 18, 1976, 90 Stat. 2512.)

1 So in original. Probably should be "to".
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE

DAVON R. JOHNSON,

Defendant Below,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF DELAWARE,

Plaintiff Below,

Appellee.

§

§ No. 38, 2015

§

§

§ Court Below: Superior Court

§ of the State of Delaware,

§ in and for New Castle County

§ Cr. ID No. 0704013046

§ 

§

§

Submitted: March 10, 2015

Decided: March 12, 2015

ORDER

This 12th day of March 2015, it appears to the Court that, on February 23, 

2015, the Chief Deputy Clerk issued a notice directing the appellant to show cause 

why this appeal should not be dismissed for his failure to file a notice of appeal 

within thirty days after entry on the docket of the November 20, 2014 Superior 

Court order dismissing his second motion for postconviction relief. The appellant 

has not responded to the notice to show cause within the required ten-day period 

and therefore dismissal of this appeal is deemed to be unopposed.

NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS ORDERED, under Supreme Court Rules 

3(b)(2) and 29(b), that this appeal is DISMISSED.

BY THE COURT:

/s/ Leo E. Strine, Jr.

Chief Justice
### §277d. Funds received from Mexico; expenditure

Any moneys contributed by or received from the United Mexican States, the North American Development Bank, or the Border Environment Cooperation Commission for the purpose of cooperating or assisting in carrying out the provisions of sections 277 to 277d of this title shall be available for expenditure in connection with any appropriation which may be made for the purposes of such sections.

(May 13, 1924, ch. 153, §5, as added Aug. 19, 1935, ch. 561, 49 Stat. 660; amended Pub. L. 107–228, div. A, title II, §210, Sept. 30, 2002, 116 Stat. 1365.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

2002—Pub. L. 107–228 inserted ", the North American Development Bank, or the Border Environment Cooperation Commission" after "United Mexican States".
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 00-1131

BRADLY G. DALTON,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

SCHOOL BOARD OF THE CITY OF NORFOLK,

Defendant - Appellee,

and

ROY NICHOLS, Former Superintendent; JOHN

SMITH, School Administrator; PAMELA RIDDICK,

School Administrator; CATHY LASSITER, School

Administrator; ANN HALL, School Administrator,

Defendants.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Jerome B. Friedman, District Judge.

(CA-98-975-2)

Submitted: July 14, 2000 Decided: August 1, 2000

Before WIDENER and MOTZ, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
2

Bradly G. Dalton, Appellant Pro Se. Daniel R. Hagemeister, CITY

ATTORNEY’S OFFICE, Norfolk, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).

PER CURIAM:

Bradly G. Dalton appeals the district court’s order granting

summary judgment to the School Board of the City of Norfolk in this

action alleging a violation of the Age Discrimination in Employment

Act. We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion

and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See Dalton v. School Bd. of Norfolk,

No. CA-98-975-2 (E.D. Va. Jan. 10, 2000). We dispense with oral

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately

presented in the materials before the court and argument would not

aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THE SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE UNAUDITED
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OF THE OILGEAR COMPANY FOR THE NINE MONTHS ENDED SEPTEMBER
30, 1999 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1999
<CASH>                                       4,719,633
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                               19,724,472
<ALLOWANCES>                                   288,620
<INVENTORY>                                 25,638,945
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            52,402,869
<PP&E>                                      65,045,936
<DEPRECIATION>                              37,466,993
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              86,620,323
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       16,874,478
<BONDS>                                     24,258,964
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                    11,488,687
<OTHER-SE>                                  21,340,056
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                86,620,323
<SALES>                                     67,861,279
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            67,861,279
<CGS>                                       48,613,237
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               48,613,237
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                            16,378,190
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           1,262,499
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              1,691,438
<INCOME-TAX>                                   480,626
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          1,124,236
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 1,124,236
<EPS-BASIC>                                       0.57
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.57


</TABLE>
### §272b. Loyalty check on United States personnel

No person shall serve as representative, delegate, or alternate from the United States until such person has been investigated as to loyalty and security by the Director of the Office of Personnel Management.

(June 30, 1948, ch. 756, §3, 62 Stat. 1152; Apr. 5, 1952, ch. 159, §1, 66 Stat. 43; 1978 Reorg. Plan No. 2, §102, eff. Jan. 1, 1979, 43 F.R. 36037, 92 Stat. 3784.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

1952—Act Apr. 5, 1952, substituted "Civil Service Commission" for "Federal Bureau of Investigation".

#### **Executive Documents**

#### Transfer of Functions

"Director of the Office of Personnel Management" substituted in text for "Civil Service Commission" pursuant to Reorg. Plan No. 2 of 1978, §102, 43 F.R. 36037, 92 Stat. 3783, set out under section 1101 of Title 5, Government Organization and Employees, which transferred functions vested by statute in Civil Service Commission to Director of Office of Personnel Management (except as otherwise specified), effective Jan. 1, 1979, as provided by section 1–102 of Ex. Ord. No. 12107, Dec. 28, 1978, 44 F.R. 1055, set out under section 1101 of Title 5.
### §2431j. Consultations with Congress

The President shall consult with the appropriate congressional committees on a periodic basis to review the operation of the Facility under this subchapter and the eligibility of countries for benefits from the Facility under this subchapter.

(Pub. L. 87–195, pt. V, §812, as added Pub. L. 105–214, §1, July 29, 1998, 112 Stat. 893.)

#### **Executive Documents**

#### Delegation of Functions

For delegation of functions of President under this section, see Ex. Ord. No. 12163, Sept. 29, 1979, 44 F.R. 56673, as amended, set out as a note under section 2381 of this title.

For delegation of functions of President under this section, see section 1 of Ex. Ord. No. 13345, July 8, 2004, 69 F.R. 41901, set out as a note under section 1738 of Title 7, Agriculture.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY HIGH

 508

 468

 428

 368

 339

 386

 394

 446

 500

 588

 371

 673

 665

 671

 655

 629

 533

 409

 361

 313

 269

 548

 597

 642

 745

 828

 793

 789

 772

 813

 703

 174

 185

 173

 173

 166

 162

 159

 157

 152

 159

 173

 160

 168

 187

 178

 193

 174

 173

 173

 183

 232

 253

 202

 210

 203

 209

 214

 218

 228

 224

 235

 267

 268

 256

 245

 238

 230

 241

 254

 262

 278

 281

 334

 338

 342

 333

 343

 322

 272

 252

 252

 251

 365

 326

 348

 359

 375

 385

 398

 405

 426

 399

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

AUGUST 2008 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: September 2, 2008

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

SAN ANDREAS ON THE SAN JOAQUIN RIVER
## NUMBER 13 - 1 1 - 00 2 93 - CV COURT OF APPEALS THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG

____________________________________________________________ PRECINCT 2 CONSTABLE GILBERT ALANIZ , APPELLANT,

v. CLAUDIA LINETTE CHAGOLLA , APPELLEE.

____________________________________________________________

On a ppeal from the 398th District Court of Hidalgo County, Texas.

____________________________________________________________



## MEMORANDUM OPINION
Before Justices Benavides , Vela, and Perkes Memorandum Opinion Per Curiam Appellant, Precinct 2 Constable Gilbert Alaniz, attempted to perfect an appeal from an order signed on April 14, 2011 , in cause no. C

- 639

- 11

- I

. Upon review of the documents before the Court, it appeared that the order from which this appeal is taken is not an appealable order. On May 26 , 2011, t he Clerk of this Court notified appellant of this defect so that steps could be taken to correct the de fect, if it could be done. See T EX

.2

R. A PP

. P . 37.1, 42.3. The parties were advised to file a response within ten days , indicating whether this Court has jurisdiction and the legal basis for such a position

. Neither party has respond ed to the Court ’ s no tice. The trial court entered an order granting a verified petition to investigate a potential claim and ordered the deposition of appellant. Appellant filed a notice of appeal of the April 14, 2011 order. Presuit deposition orders are appealable only if sought from someone against whom suit is not anticipated; when sought from an anticipated defendant, such orders are considered ancillary to the subsequent suit, and thus neither final nor appealable. See Beausoleil v. Reaud, Morgan & Quinn, L.L.P., No . 09

- 11

- 00056

- CV, 1022 Tex. App. LEXIS 993, (Tex. App.

— Beaumont February 11, 2011). In terms of appellate jurisdiction, appellate courts only have jurisdiction to review final judgments and certain interlocutory orders identified by statute. Lehmann v. Har

- Con Corp ., 39 S.W.3d 191, 195 (Tex. 2001). The trial court’s pre

- suit deposition order is ancillary to an anticipated suit to which Precinct 2 Constable Gilbert Alaniz is an anticipated defendant. Because we lack appellate jurisdiction, the appeal mu st be dismissed. Accordingly, the appeal is DISMISSED FOR WANT OF JURISDICTION. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 42.3(a),(c).

PER CURIAM
D elivered and filed the 4th day of August , 201 1

.
§ 411.600 Is there a process for resolving disputes between beneficiaries and ENs that are not State VR agencies? Yes. After an IWP is signed, a process is available which will assure each party a full, fair and timely review of a disputed matter. This process has three steps. ( a ) The beneficiary can seek a solution through the EN's internal grievance procedures.
( b ) If the EN's internal grievance procedures do not result in an agreeable solution, either the beneficiary or the EN may seek a resolution from the PM. (See § 411.115(k) for a definition of the PM.)
( c ) If either the beneficiary or the EN is dissatisfied with the resolution proposed by the PM, either party may request a decision from us.
EXHIBIT 11


                      FIRST KEYSTONE CORPORATION
               COMPUTATION OF EARNINGS PER COMMON SHARE

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>

                    Six Month Period Ended June 30,
                             1999 and 1998


(Dollars in Thousands)
                                               1999          1998

<S>                                          <C>           <C>
Primary
  Net Income                                 $          2,523       $           2,389
    Shares
      Weighted average number of
        common shares outstanding                   2,883,826               2,933,534
      Adjustments - increases or
        decreases                                        None                    None
      Weighted average number of
        common shares outstanding
        as adjusted                                 2,883,826               2,933,534

      Primary earnings per common
      share                                  $            .87    $           .81


Assuming full dilution
  Net Income                                 $          2,523       $           2,389
    Shares
      Weighted average number of
        common shares outstanding                   2,883,826               2,933,534
      Adjustments - increases or
        decreases                                        None                    None
      Weighted average number of
        common shares outstanding
        as adjusted                                 2,883,826               2,933,534

      Earnings per common share
        assuming full dilution               $            .87    $           .81



</TABLE>
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY HIGH

 265

 270

 296

 330

 330

 394

 666

 641

 521

 479

 0

 358

 343

 342

 270

 344

 594

 863

 1,190

 1,333

 1,569

 1,779

 1,387

 986

 1,246

 565

 590

 731

 747

 713

 757

 179

 178

 178

 177

 175

 174

 175

 175

 177

 176

 0

 182

 183

 180

 178

 178

 180

 178

 185

 184

 190

 194

 197

 196

 195

 215

 220

 221

 217

 216

 215

 196

 196

 200

 200

 196

 208

 260

 263

 233

 239

 0

 208

 210

 211

 196

 204

 238

 288

 347

 396

 424

 478

 436

 391

 363

 286

 316

 313

 307

 297

 287

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

OCTOBER 2020 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: December 8, 2020

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

RIO VISTA ON THE SACRAMENTO RIVER
# Table A1
```

[Congressional Bills 114th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 4092 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

114th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 4092

 To reauthorize the sound recording and film preservation programs of 
            the Library of Congress, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           November 19, 2015

  Mr. Brady of Pennsylvania introduced the following bill; which was 
 referred to the Committee on House Administration, and in addition to 
    the Committee on the Judiciary, for a period to be subsequently 
   determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such 
 provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To reauthorize the sound recording and film preservation programs of 
            the Library of Congress, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SOUND RECORDING PRESERVATION PROGRAMS.

    (a) National Recording Preservation Board.--Section 133 of the 
National Recording Preservation Act of 2000 (2 U.S.C. 1743) is amended 
by striking ``through fiscal year 2016'' and inserting ``through fiscal 
year 2026''.
    (b) National Recording Preservation Foundation.--
            (1) Reauthorization.--Section 152411(a) of title 36, United 
        States Code, is amended by striking ``through fiscal year 2016 
        an amount not to exceed'' and inserting ``through fiscal year 
        2026 an amount not to exceed the lesser of $1,000,000 or''.
            (2) Number of members of board of directors.--Section 
        152403(b)(2) of such title is amended--
                    (A) in subparagraph (A), by striking ``nine 
                directors'' and inserting ``12 directors''; and
                    (B) in subparagraph (C), by striking ``six 
                directors'' each place it appears and inserting ``8 
                directors''.

SEC. 2. FILM PRESERVATION PROGRAMS.

    (a) National Film Preservation Board.--Section 112 of the National 
Film Preservation Act of 1996 (2 U.S.C. 179v) is amended by striking 
``through fiscal year 2016'' and inserting ``through fiscal year 
2026''.
    (b) National Film Preservation Foundation.--Section 151711(a)(1)(C) 
of title 36, United States Code, is amended by striking ``through 
2016'' and inserting ``through 2026''.
                                 <all>
```
# C_2012382EN.01001201.xml

| 12.12.2012 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 382/12 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

12.12.2012

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 382/12

---

Notice of the expiry of certain anti-dumping measures

2012/C 382/10

Further to the publication of a notice of impending expiry (1) following which no duly substantiated request for a review was lodged, the Commission gives notice that the anti-dumping measure mentioned below will shortly expire.

1

This notice is published in accordance with Article 11(2) of Council Regulation (EC) No 1225/2009 of 30 November 2009 on protection against dumped imports from countries not members of the European Community (2).

2

| Product | Country(ies) of origin or exportation | Measures | Reference | Date of expiry (3) |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Gas-fuelled, non-refillable pocket flint lighters and certain refillable pocket flint lighters | People's Republic of China and Taiwan | Anti-dumping duty | Council Regulation (EC) No 1458/2007 (OJ L 326, 12.12.2007, p. 1) | 13.12.2012 |

Product

Country(ies) of origin or exportation

Measures

Reference

Date of expiry (3)

3

Gas-fuelled, non-refillable pocket flint lighters and certain refillable pocket flint lighters

People's Republic of China and Taiwan

Anti-dumping duty

Council Regulation (EC) No 1458/2007 (OJ L 326, 12.12.2007, p. 1)

13.12.2012

---

(1)  OJ C 127, 1.5.2012, p. 3.

1

(2)  OJ L 343, 22.12.2009, p. 51.

2

(3)  The measure expires at midnight of the day mentioned in this column.

3

---