alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
### §3502. Purposes and establishment; policy guidelines and objectives

(a) To strengthen the capacity of the people of developing countries to solve their development problems through scientific and technological innovation, to foster research on problems of development, and to facilitate scientific and technological cooperation with developing countries, the President is authorized to establish an Institute for Scientific and Technological Cooperation (hereafter in this chapter referred to as the "Institute"), which shall be subject to the foreign policy guidance of the Secretary of State.

(b) The Institute shall be guided by the policies set forth in sections 2151 and 2151–1 of this title and shall direct a substantial share of its resources to those objectives.

(Pub. L. 96–53, title IV, §402, Aug. 14, 1979, 93 Stat. 372.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

This chapter, referred to in subsec. (a), was in the original "this title", meaning title IV of Pub. L. 96–53, Aug. 14, 1979, 93 Stat. 371, which is classified principally to this chapter. For complete classification of title IV to the Code, see Tables.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date

Section effective Oct. 1, 1979, see section 512(a) of Pub. L. 96–53, set out as an Effective Date of 1979 Amendment note under section 2151 of this title.
### §239a. Repealed. Pub. L. 97–35, title V, §542(1), Aug. 13, 1981, 95 Stat. 458

Section, act Sept. 30, 1950, ch. 1124, title I, §4A, as added Oct. 3, 1980, Pub. L. 96–374, title XIII, §1341, 95 Stat. 1500, related to payments for special programs for alien children who fled from Cambodia, Vietnam, Laos, Cuba, or Haiti. See provisions set out as notes under section 1522 of Title 8, Aliens and Nationality.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date of Repeal

Repeal effective Oct. 1, 1981, see section 547 of Pub. L. 97–35, set out as a note under section 1522 of Title 8, Aliens and Nationality.
Exhibit 21.1
 SUBSIDIARIES OF THE REGISTRANT
  Name
    
    Jurisdiction225 Summit Associates LLC
    
    New JerseyCLD Corporation
    
    DelawareHealtheon International LLC
    
    DelawareWebMD International, LLC
    
    DelawareWebMD Canada Ventures, Inc.
    
    CanadaWebMD UK Limited
    
    England & WalesHealtheon Software India Private Limited
    
    IndiaHLTH Domain Corporation
    
    DelawareMedical Information Services, LLC
    
    DelawareMedscape LLC
    
    DelawareConceptis LLC
    
    DelawareeMedicine.com LLC
    
    DelawarePRX Holdings Corp.
    
    DelawareSNTC Holding, Inc.
    
    DelawareSYN Healthcare Service, Inc.
    
    CaliforniaSYNC Corp.
    
    New JerseyWebMD Global LLC
    
    DelawareWebMD France
    
    FranceWebMD Global Spain, S.L.
    
    SpainWebMD International, Inc.
    
    DelawareWebMD, LLC
    
    DelawareMedicineNet, Inc.
    
    CaliforniaOnHealth Network LLC
    
    WashingtonBabyData.com, Inc.
    
    DelawareDemand Management, Inc.
    
    ColoradoHealth Decisions, Inc.
    
    ColoradoHealth
Decisions International, LLC1
    
    ColoradoWebMD Domain Corp.
    
    DelawareWebMD Health Services Group, Inc.
    
    DelawareSubimo LLC
    
    DelawareHealthShare Technology, Inc.
    
    DelawareSummex Corporation
    
    IndianaOW Corp.
    
    DelawareWebMD UK Limited
    
    United KingdomWebMD Professional Services LLC
    
    DelawareMedsite LLC
    
    Delaware
 
 1
    
    70% owned by Demand Management, Inc. and 30% owned by Health Decisions, Inc.
<page>  EXHIBIT 32.01


CERTIFICATION OF PRESIDENT PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




In connection with the Quarterly Report of Morgan Stanley
Cornerstone Fund III L.P. (the ?Partnership?) on Form 10-Q for the
quarter ended March 31, 2008, as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the ?Report?), I, Walter
Davis, President of Demeter Management Corporation, the general
partner of the Partnership, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:
(1)	The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
(2)	The information contained in the Report fairly presents,
in all material respects, the financial condition and
results of operations of the Partnership.







By:	  /s/	Walter Davis

Name:		Walter Davis
Title:	President of Demeter Management Corporation,
			the general partner of the Partnership

Date:		May 15, 2008
### §3967. Salaries for Foreign Service personnel abroad who perform routine duties

(a) The Secretary may establish salary rates at rates lower than those established for the Foreign Service Schedule for the Foreign Service personnel described in subsection (b). The rates established under this subsection may be no less than the then applicable minimum wage rate specified in section 206(a)(1) of title 29.

(b) The Secretary may pay Foreign Service personnel who are recruited abroad, who are not available or are not qualified for assignment to another Foreign Service post, and who perform duties of a more routine nature than are generally performed by Foreign Service personnel assigned to class 9 in the Foreign Service Schedule, in accordance with the salary rates established under subsection (a).

(Pub. L. 96–465, title I, §407, Oct. 17, 1980, 94 Stat. 2090.)
NUMBER 13-11-00293-CV

COURT OF APPEALS

THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG

____________________________________________________________

PRECINCT 2 CONSTABLE GILBERT ALANIZ, APPELLANT,

v.

CLAUDIA LINETTE CHAGOLLA, APPELLEE.

____________________________________________________________

On appeal from the 398th District Court

of Hidalgo County, Texas.

____________________________________________________________

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Before Justices Benavides, Vela, and Perkes

Memorandum Opinion Per Curiam

Appellant, Precinct 2 Constable Gilbert Alaniz, attempted to perfect an appeal from 

an order signed on April 14, 2011, in cause no. C-639-11-I. Upon review of the 

documents before the Court, it appeared that the order from which this appeal is taken is 

not an appealable order. On May 26, 2011, the Clerk of this Court notified appellant of 

this defect so that steps could be taken to correct the defect, if it could be done. See TEX.
2

R. APP. P. 37.1, 42.3. The parties were advised to file a response within ten days, 

indicating whether this Court has jurisdiction and the legal basis for such a position. 

Neither party has responded to the Court’s notice. 

The trial court entered an order granting a verified petition to investigate a potential 

claim and ordered the deposition of appellant. Appellant filed a notice of appeal of the 

April 14, 2011 order. 

Presuit deposition orders are appealable only if sought from someone against 

whom suit is not anticipated; when sought from an anticipated defendant, such orders are 

considered ancillary to the subsequent suit, and thus neither final nor appealable. See 

Beausoleil v. Reaud, Morgan & Quinn, L.L.P., No. 09-11-00056-CV, 1022 Tex. App. 

LEXIS 993, (Tex. App.—Beaumont February 11, 2011).

In terms of appellate jurisdiction, appellate courts only have jurisdiction to review 

final judgments and certain interlocutory orders identified by statute. Lehmann v. 

Har-Con Corp., 39 S.W.3d 191, 195 (Tex. 2001). The trial court’s pre-suit deposition 

order is ancillary to an anticipated suit to which Precinct 2 Constable Gilbert Alaniz is an 

anticipated defendant. Because we lack appellate jurisdiction, the appeal must be 

dismissed. Accordingly, the appeal is DISMISSED FOR WANT OF JURISDICTION. 

See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.3(a),(c). 

PER CURIAM

Delivered and filed the

4th day of August, 2011.
§ 641.320 Must all national grantees operating within a State participate in the State planning process? ( a ) The eligibility provision at OAA § 514(c)(6) requires national grantees to coordinate activities with other organizations at the State and local levels. Therefore, except as provided in paragraph (b) of this section, any national grantee that does not participate in the State planning process may be deemed ineligible to receive SCSEP funds in the following Program Year.
( b ) National grantees serving older American Indians, or Pacific Island and Asian Americans, with funds reserved under OAA sec. 506(a)(3), are exempted from the requirement to participate in the State planning processes under sec. 503(a)(9) of the OAA. Although these national grantees may choose not to participate in the State planning process, the Department encourages their participation. Only those grantees using reserved funds are exempt; if a grantee is awarded one grant with reserved funds and another grant with non-reserved funds, the grantee is required under paragraph (a) of this section to participate in the State planning process for purposes of the non-reserved funds grant.
[75 FR 53812, Sept. 1, 2010, as amended at 82 FR 56882, Dec. 1, 2017]
(No. 74-CC-253

#### Arthur Dozier, Jr., Claimant, *vs.*State of Illinois, Division of Vocational Rehabilitation, Respondent.

*Opinion filed February 14, 1974.*

Arthur Dozier, Jr., Claimant, pro se.

*228William J. Scott, Attorney General; Howard W. Feldman, Assistant Attorney General, for Respondent.

Per Curiam.
### §§1132, 1133. Repealed. Pub. L. 86–707, title V, §511(a)(1), Sept. 6, 1960, 74 Stat. 800

Section 1132, acts Aug. 13, 1946, ch. 957, title IX, §902, 60 Stat. 1026; July 28, 1956, ch. 770, §11, 70 Stat. 705, authorized the Secretary of State to allot funds to defray the unusual expenses incident to the operation and maintenance of official residences suitable for principal representatives of the United States. See section 5913 of Title 5, Government Organization and Employees.

Section 1133, act Aug. 13, 1946, ch. 957, title IX, §903, 60 Stat. 1026, required the Secretary of State to account for all allowances and allotments.
EXHIBIT 32.2



               CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
                  PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

                        AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
            SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



     In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10Q of First
Keystone Corporation (the "Corporation") for the period ended
September 30, 2007, as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission (the "Report"), I, Diane C.A. Rosler, Chief Financial
Officer, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as added by
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:

    1.  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
        13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

    2.  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
        all material respects, the financial condition and results
        of operations of the Corporation as of and for the period
        covered by the Report.



                                  /s/ Diane C.A. Rosler
                                  Diane C.A. Rosler
                                  Chief Financial Officer


November 8, 2007


                                29
Document headings vary by document type but may contain
                    the following: the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document
the number of the CFR title and the number of each part
                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly
                      related to
the agency docket number / agency internal file number
the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in
                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory
                      Actions See the
                    Document Drafting Handbook
                    for more details.
 Department of Justice Drug Enforcement Administration
 By Notice dated June 17, 2010, and published in the 
                    **Federal Register**
                     on June 28, 2010, 75 FR 36679, Lin Zhi International Inc., 670 Almanor Avenue, Sunnyvale, California 94085, made application by renewal to the Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA) to be registered as a bulk manufacturer of the basic classes of controlled substances listed in schedules I and II: Drug
ScheduleTetrahydrocannabinols (7370)
I3,4-Methylenedioxymethamphetamine (MDMA) (7405)
ICocaine (9041)
IIOxycodone (9143)
IIHydrocodone (9193)
IIMethadone (9250)
IIDextropropoxyphene, bulk (non-dosage forms) (9273)
IIMorphine (9300)
II
 The company plans to manufacture the listed controlled substances as bulk reagents for use in drug abuse testing.
                    ( print page 22147) No comments or objections have been received. DEA has considered the factors in 21 U.S.C. 823(a) and determined that the registration of Lin Zhi International Inc., to manufacture the listed basic classes of controlled substances is consistent with the public interest at this time. DEA has investigated Lin Zhi International Inc., to ensure that the company's registration is consistent with the public interest. The investigation has included inspection and testing of the company's physical security systems, verification of the company's compliance with State and local laws, and a review of the company's background and history. Therefore, pursuant to 21 U.S.C. 823, and in accordance with 21 CFR 1301.33, the above named company is granted registration as a bulk manufacturer of the basic classes of controlled substances listed. Dated: April 13, 2011. Joseph T. Rannazzisi, Deputy Assistant Administrator, Office of Diversion Control, Drug Enforcement Administration.


[FR Doc. 2011-9611 Filed 4-19-11; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 4410-09-P
Exhibit








Exhibit 10.1




NetScout Systems, Inc.
Summary of Non-Employee Director Compensation


Non-employee directors are compensated $60,000 annually for their services and do not receive any additional compensation for any regular Board meeting attended. The lead non-employee director receives an additional annual retainer of $35,000. Non-employee directors will receive $15,000 annually for serving on the Audit Committee, $10,000 annually for serving on the Compensation Committee, $6,000 annually for serving on the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee, and $6,000 annually for serving on the Finance Committee. In addition, directors who are chairpersons of a particular committee are also given additional annual compensation of $15,000 for the Audit Committee, $10,000 for the Compensation Committee, $6,000 for the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee, and $6,000 for the Finance Committee. The cash component of their compensation is paid quarterly. Non-employee directors are also reimbursed for their reasonable out-of-pocket expenses incurred in attending meetings of the Board or of any committee and for attendance at approved director education programs.


Non-employee directors are each granted an annual equity-based award in the form of restricted stock units.  Effective September 12, 2018, the amount of the annual equity-based award is 7,000 restricted stock units.  These restricted stock units vest 100% on the date of our annual meeting provided that during such year, such director attends at least 75%, collectively, of the meetings of the Board and any committee of the Board of which such director is a member. In the event that the foregoing attendance requirements are not met, then 100% of these restricted stock units will vest on the third anniversary of the date of grant. No other equity awards are given to our non-employee directors.
## ** **

## **EXHIBIT 32.2**

## ** **

## **CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

## ** **

In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-Kof 155 East Tropicana, LLC, a Nevada limited-liability company, and 155 EastTropicana Finance Corp., a Nevada corporation (collectively, the “Company”),for the twelve months ended December 31, 2007, as filed with theSecurities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), Neil G.Kiefer, as President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, herebycertifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

(1)                                  The Reportfully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) ofthe Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2)                                  The informationcontained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

 
| /s/ Neil G. Kiefer                     |   |
|----------------------------------------|--------|
| Neil G. Kiefer,                        |   |
| President and Chief  Executive Officer |   |
| March 31, 2008                    |   |

 

 

The foregoing certifications are being furnishedsolely pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350 and are not being filed as part of theReport or as a separate disclosure document.

 

----
### §277g–1. Authority of Secretary of State to plan, construct, operate, and maintain facilities

The Secretary of State, acting through the Commissioner, is authorized to act jointly with the appropriate representative of the Government of Mexico and to—

(1) supervise the planning of, and

(2) supervise construction, operation, and maintenance of,

the facilities recommended in agreements concluded pursuant to section 277g of this title and approved by the Governments of the United States and Mexico.

(Pub. L. 100–465, §3, Oct. 3, 1988, 102 Stat. 2272.)
Dominique M. Stuart -/ RTMrNT OF 

• :obnm'Alir'Ki 

• . Vu'i wl ; ih i lUi V 

4110 Fort Worth Place ' - [ CPERATI0N3 

Alexandria, VA 22304 r.-j .--<> -, n -^ i. i,o 

(773)450-1670 

To whom it may concern: 

I moved to Virginia from Lansing back m 2005. From 2005 till 2011, there were no direct flights into 

Lansing from Northern Virginia. As such, I had to fly to Detroit and take a small connecting plane to 

Lansing. Before having kids, this was less of a problem. But, since having children, I've cut down my 

flights to Michigan considerably. 

Since Sun Country started flying direct to Lansing last year, I've been able to fly easily with both kids. 

I've also been able to convince my family to visit more often. The flights have always been full. This is 

a huge economic driver for the city of Lansing where automotive cutbacks have taken such a 

tremendous toll. And it's a huge benefit to so many people on a personal level (being able to see their 

families more than twice a year). 

With both of my grandparents not well, I cherish every opportunity for me and my girls to visit them. 

The Sun Country flights have afforded us that opportunity over the past year. I am so grateful! I beg 

you to allow Sun Covmtry to continue their daily flights from DC A to LAN. 

Thank you for your consideration of this important request. 

Regards, 

Dominique M. Stuart
### §1642a. Financial provisions

#### (a) Deposit of proceeds of certain property

The Secretary of the Treasury is directed to hold, in an account in the Treasury of the United States, the net proceeds of the sale of certain Czechoslovakian steel mill equipment heretofore blocked and sold in the United States by order of the Secretary of the Treasury under authority of Executive Order Numbered 9193, dated July 6, 1942 (7 F.R. 5205, July 9, 1942).

#### (b) Creation of Czechoslovakian Claims Fund

There is created in the Treasury of the United States a fund to be designated the Czechoslovakian Claims Fund, for the payment of unsatisfied claims of nationals of the United States against Czechoslovakia as authorized in this subchapter.

#### (c) Voluntary settlement and payment of claims of nationals of the United States

If, within one year following August 8, 1958, the Government of Czechoslovakia voluntarily settles with and pays to the Government of the United States a sum in payment of claims of United States nationals against Czechoslovakia, all moneys held pursuant to subsection (a) of this section shall be disposed of in accordance with the terms of the settlement agreement with Czechoslovakia and applicable provisions of this subchapter and the sum paid by Czechoslovakia shall be covered into the Czechoslovakian Claims Fund.

#### (d) Deposit of net proceeds into Fund

Upon the expiration of one year after August 8, 1958 if no settlement with Czechoslovakia of the type specified in subsection (c) of this section has occurred, all moneys held pursuant to subsection (a) of this section except amounts held in reserve pursuant to section 1642b of this title, shall be covered into the Czechoslovakian Claims Fund.

#### (e) Deductions for expenses

The Secretary of the Treasury shall deduct from the Czechoslovakian Claims Fund 5 per centum thereof as reimbursement to the Government of the United States for the expenses incurred by the Commission and by the Treasury Department in the administration of this subchapter. The amount so deducted shall be covered into the Treasury to the credit of miscellaneous receipts.

#### (f) Disposition of balance of Fund

After the deduction for administrative expenses pursuant to subsection (e) of this section, and after payment of awards certified pursuant to section 1642i of this title, the balance remaining in the Fund, if any, shall be paid to Czechoslovakia in accordance with instructions to be provided by the Secretary of State.

(Mar. 10, 1950, ch. 54, title IV, §402, as added Pub. L. 85–604, §1, Aug. 8, 1958, 72 Stat. 527.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

Executive Order Numbered 9193, dated July 6, 1942 (7 F.R. 5205, July 9, 1942), referred to in subsec. (a), is Ex. Ord. No. 9193, July 6, 1942, 7 F.R. 5205, which amended Ex. Ord. No. 9095, formerly set out under section 6 of the former Appendix to Title 50, War and National Defense, which was revoked by Ex. Ord. No. 12553, Feb. 25, 1986, 51 F.R. 7237.