alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
CERTIFICATIONS PURSUANT TO THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906

OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





I, Mathew H. Wong, Chief Financial Officer of Dejour Enterprises Ltd. (the Company) do hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge:



1.

This Annual Report on Form 20-F of the Company for the period ended December 31, 2005, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the report), fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



2.

The information contained in the report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





Date: July 14, 2006





/s/  Mathew H. Wong

Mathew H. Wong,

Chief Financial Officer













#
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion

should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited

circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.

** United States v. Booker, 543 U.S. 220 (2005).

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

August 8, 2007

Charles R. Fulbruge III

Clerk

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 06-41615

Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

Plaintiff-Appellee

v.

JOSE RENE CARDONA-BLANCO

Defendant-Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Texas

USDC No. 5:06-CR-850-1

Before DENNIS, CLEMENT, and PRADO, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Appealing the Judgment in a Criminal Case, Jose Rene Cardona-Blanco

(Cardona) seeks to preserve for further review his contention that his sentence

is unreasonable because this court’s post-Booker** rulings have effectively

reinstated the mandatory Sentencing Guideline regime condemned in Booker.

Cardona concedes that his argumentis foreclosed by United States v. Mares, 402
No. 06-41615

2

F.3d 511 (5th Cir. 2005), and its progeny, which have outlined this court’s

methodology for reviewing sentences for reasonableness. In light of Rita v.

United States, 127 S. Ct. 2456, 2462-68 (2007), the issue remains foreclosed.

Cardona also raises arguments that are foreclosed by Almendarez-Torres v.

United States, 523 U.S. 224, 235 (1998), which held that 8 U.S.C. § 1326(b)(2) is

a penalty provision and not a separate criminal offense. The Government’s

motion for summary affirmance is GRANTED, and the judgment of the district

court is AFFIRMED.
[if !vml]>[endif]>

[if !vml]>[endif]>

You have reached the FederalDepository Library Program Electronic Collection (FDLP/EC) Archive. Thisarchive assures ongoing access to publications in the FDLP/EC. Access topublications in the archive is available through GPO's suite of cataloging andlocator services, including the Catalog of U.S. Government Publications(CGP).  Archived copies of publications are retrieved in the event thatpublications are no longer available from the original publishing agency site. 
**Title:**Transportationoperations research and development, Turner-Fairbank Highway Research Center... update
 
June 2014 |Fall 2014 | Spring 2015| Fall 2015
 
SuDoc Number:TD 2.30:T 68/
Item Number:0265-B-04 (online)
System Number:000941753
September 24, 2019
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS AS OF JUNE 30, 1997 AND THE CONDENSED
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS FOR THE SIX MONTHS ENDED JUNE 30, 1997 AND
IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1997
<CASH>                                           4,250
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  207,397
<ALLOWANCES>                                     2,479
<INVENTORY>                                    226,095
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               438,912
<PP&E>                                          83,171
<DEPRECIATION>                                  20,571
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 520,827
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          204,215
<BONDS>                                        125,644
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                     15,000
<COMMON>                                           455
<OTHER-SE>                                     169,794
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   520,827
<SALES>                                        803,958
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               923,109
<CGS>                                          723,927
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  798,669
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               6,670
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 21,420
<INCOME-TAX>                                     8,568
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    12,852
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.26
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.26
        

</TABLE>
*

 Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the Court has determined that this opinion should not be

published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

July 13, 2004

Charles R. Fulbruge III

Clerk

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 03-40004

 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

versus

EULOGIO DOMINGUEZ-GONZALES, 

Defendant - Appellant.

--------------------

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Texas, Laredo

No. 5:02cr414

--------------------

Before SMITH, BENAVIDES, and PICKERING Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Appellant Eulogio Dominguez-Gonzales challenges hisfelonyillegalreentryconviction under

8 U.S.C. § 1325(a) on the ground that his prior misdemeanor conviction for illegal entry was the

result of an uncounseled plea and, t herefore, was improperly used to enhance the instant felony

offense. Appellant’s misdemeanor conviction resulted in a stand-alone sentence of probation that did

not carry with it a term of imprisonment or a suspended sentence. Accordingly, he was not entitled

to counsel when he pleaded guilty to the misdemeanor charge. See United States v. Perez-Macias,
1

 Appellant challenges this Court’s holding in Perez-Macias. He concedes that the

decision in Perez-Macias is binding on the Court, but raises the issue to preserve it for further

review.

2

335 F.3d 421, 427-28 (5th Cir. 2003).1 Appellant attempts to distinguish Perez-Macias because the

court later revoked his probation and imposed a jail sentence. Nothing in Perez-Macias, however,

“suggests that the plea and the conviction based on that guilty plea should be retroactively vacated

because the defendant violated the terms of his probation and the court found it necessary to revoke

the probation.” United States v. Rios-Cruz, No. 03-40074, 2004 WL 1469290, at *1 (5th Cir. May

17, 2004). Because there was no Sixth Amendment violation with respect to Appellant’s prior

misdemeanor conviction, this conviction properly served to enhance the instant offense. See Nichols

v. United States, 511 U.S. 738, 748-49 (1994); Perez-Macias, 335 F.3d at 428-29. We, therefore,

affirm.

AFFIRMED.
114TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 4240 

AN ACT 

To require an independent review of the operation and administration of the Terrorist Screening Database 

(TSDB) maintained by the Federal Bureau of Investigation and subsets of the TSDB, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 
2 

•HR 4240 EH

1 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

2 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘No Fly for Foreign 

3 Fighters Act’’. 

4 SEC. 2. GAO STUDY ON THE TERRORIST SCREENING DATA5 BASE. 

6 (a) IN GENERAL.—Not later than 1 year after the 

7 date of enactment of this Act, the Comptroller General 

8 of the United States shall conduct a study and submit, 

9 to the Committee on the Judiciary of the House of Rep10 resentatives and the Committee on the Judiciary of the 

11 Senate, a report on— 

12 (1) whether past weaknesses in the operation 

13 and administration of the Terrorist Screening Data14 base (hereinafter referred to as the ‘‘TSDB’’) and 

15 subsets of the TSDB have been addressed; and 

16 (2) the extent to which existing vulnerabilities 

17 to the United States may be addressed or mitigated 

18 through additional changes to the TSDB and sub19 sets of the TSDB, thereby enhancing America’s se20 curity and defenses. 

21 (b) REQUIRED INFORMATION.—The study and report 

22 under subsection (a) shall include information on the ex23 tent to which— 

24 (1) information is being integrated into the 

25 TSDB from all relevant sources across the govern26 ment in a timely manner; 
3 

•HR 4240 EH

1 (2) agencies are able to comply with increased 

2 demands for information to improve the TSDB; 

3 (3) the TSDB, and relevant subsets of the 

4 TSDB, are accessible to agencies, authorities, and 

5 other entities, as appropriate; and 

6 (4) the TSDB is capable of enabling users to 

7 identify known or suspected terrorists in the most 

8 timely and comprehensive manner possible. 

Passed the House of Representatives April 27, 2016. 

Attest: 

Clerk. 
114TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 4240 

AN ACT 

To require an independent review of the operation 

TSDB, and for other purposes. Bureau of Investigation and subsets of the Database (TSDB) maintained by the Federal and administration of the Terrorist Screening
### §286e–1f. Additional increase in capital stock of Bank; subscription to additional shares; authorization of appropriations

(a) The United States Governor of the Bank is authorized—

(1) to vote for an increase of seventy thousand shares in the authorized capital stock of the Bank; and

(2) if such increase becomes effective, to subscribe on behalf of the United States to thirteen thousand and five additional shares of the capital stock of the Bank: Provided, however, That any subscription to additional shares shall be effective only to such extent or in such amounts as are provided in advance in appropriations Acts.

(b) In order to pay for the increase in the United States subscription to the Bank provided for in this section, there are authorized to be appropriated, without fiscal year limitation, $1,568,856,318 for payment by the Secretary of the Treasury.

(July 31, 1945, ch. 339, §27, as added Pub. L. 95–118, title II, §201, Oct. 3, 1977, 91 Stat. 1067; amended Pub. L. 97–35, title XIII, §1312, Aug. 13, 1981, 95 Stat. 740.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

1981—Subsec. (a)(2). Pub. L. 97–35 substituted "effective only to such extent or in such amounts as are provided in advance in appropriations Acts" for "made only after the amount required for such subscription has been appropriated".

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date of 1981 Amendment

Amendment by Pub. L. 97–35 effective Aug. 13, 1981, except that any funds authorized to be appropriated shall not be available for use or obligation prior to Oct. 1, 1981, see section 1372 of Pub. L. 97–35, set out as an Effective Date note under section 290i of this title.

#### Effective Date

Section effective Oct. 3, 1977, except that no funds authorized to be appropriated by this section may be available for use or obligation prior to Oct. 1, 1977, see section 1001 of Pub. L. 95–118, set out as a note under section 282i of this title.
```

[Congressional Bills 114th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 3997 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

114th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 3997

 To amend MAP-21 to establish a veterans business enterprises program, 
                        and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           November 16, 2015

   Mr. Cummings (for himself, Mr. Clyburn, Ms. Norton, Ms. Brown of 
  Florida, and Mrs. Bustos) introduced the following bill; which was 
referred to the Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure, and in 
    addition to the Committee on Small Business, for a period to be 
subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration 
  of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee 
                               concerned

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To amend MAP-21 to establish a veterans business enterprises program, 
                        and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. VETERANS BUSINESS ENTERPRISES PROGRAM.

    Section 1101 of MAP-21 (23 U.S.C. 101 note) is amended by adding at 
the end the following:
    ``(c) Veterans Business Enterprises Program.--Except to the extent 
that the Secretary determines otherwise, not less than 10 percent of 
the amounts made available for any program under divisions A and B of 
this Act and section 403 of title 23, United States Code, shall be 
expended through small business concerns owned and controlled by 
veterans, as defined in section 3(q) of the Small Business Act (15 
U.S.C. 632(q)).''.
                                 <all>
```
### §283z–9. Multilateral Investment Fund

#### (a) Authorization of contribution

The Secretary of the Treasury is authorized to contribute, and to make payment of, $500,000,000 to the Multilateral Investment Fund established pursuant to the agreements of February 11, 1992: Provided, That such funds shall only be disbursed from the Fund to countries that have governments that are democratically elected,1 that do not harbor or sponsor international terrorists; that do not fail to cooperate in narcotics matters; and that do not engage in a consistent pattern of gross violations of internationally recognized human rights.

#### (b) Authorization of appropriations

There is hereby authorized to be appropriated without fiscal year limitation $500,000,000 for the contribution authorized in subsection (a).

#### (c) Environmental assessment of actions

If an Enterprise for the Americas Multilateral Investment Fund is established pursuant to this section, the Secretary of the Treasury shall instruct the United States representative to the Fund not to vote in favor of any action proposed to be taken by the Fund which may have a significant adverse effect on the environment unless an assessment of the impact of the action on the environment has been available for at least 120 days before the vote.

(Pub. L. 86–147, §37, as added Pub. L. 102–391, title V, §594(b), Oct. 6, 1992, 106 Stat. 1693.)

1 So in original. The comma probably should be a semicolon.
! # $ % & $ ' % ( ) * + , - . / $ 0 1

* 2 3 2! # $ % & $ ' % ( ) * + , - . / $ 0 1

* 2 3 2 !! # $ % & $ ' % ( ) * + , - . / $ 0 1

* 2 3 2 "! # $ % & $ ' % ( ) * + , - . / $ 0 1

* 2 3 2 #! # $ % & $ ' % ( ) * + , - . / $ 0 1

* 2 3 2 $! # $ % & $ ' % ( ) * + , - . / $ 0 1

* 2 3 2 %! # $ % & $ ' % ( ) * + , - . / $ 0 1

* 2 3 2 &! # $ % & $ ' % ( ) * + , - . / $ 0 1

* 2 3 2 '! # $ % & $ ' % ( ) * + , - . / $ 0 1

* 2 3 2 (! # $ % & $ ' % ( ) * + , - . / $ 0 1

* 2 3 2 )! # $ % & $ ' % ( ) * + , - . / $ 0 1

* 2 3 2! # $ % & $ ' % ( ) * + , - . / $ 0 1

* 2 3 2 !! # $ % & $ ' % ( ) * + , - . / $ 0 1

* 2 3 2 "! # $ % & $ ' % ( ) * + , - . / $ 0 1

* 2 3 2 #! # $ % & $ ' % ( ) * + , - . / $ 0 1

* 2 3 2 $! # $ % & $ ' % ( ) * + , - . / $ 0 1

* 2 3 2 %! # $ % & $ ' % ( ) * + , - . / $ 0 1

* 2 3 2 &! # $ % & $ ' % ( ) * + , - . / $ 0 1

* 2 3 2 '! # $ % & $ ' % ( ) * + , - . / $ 0 1

* 2 3 2 (! # $ % & $ ' % ( ) * + , - . / $ 0 1

* 2 3 2 ! )! # $ % & $ ' % ( ) * + , - . / $ 0 1

* 2 3 2 !! # $ % & $ ' % ( ) * + , - . / $ 0 1

* 2 3 2 ! !! # $ % & $ ' % ( ) * + , - . / $ 0 1

* 2 3 2 ! "! # $ % & $ ' % ( ) * + , - . / $ 0 1

* 2 3 2 ! #! # $ % & $ ' % ( ) * + , - . / $ 0 1

* 2 3 2 ! $! # $ % & $ ' % ( ) * + , - . / $ 0 1

* 2 3 2 ! %! # $ % & $ ' % ( ) * + , - . / $ 0 1

* 2 3 2 ! &! # $ % & $ ' % ( ) * + , - . / $ 0 1

* 2 3 2 ! '! # $ % & $ ' % ( ) * + , - . / $ 0 1

* 2 3 2 ! (! # $ % & $ ' % ( ) * + , - . / $ 0 1

* 2 3 2 " )! # $ % & $ ' % ( ) * + , - . / $ 0 1

* 2 3 2 "! # $ % & $ ' % ( ) * + , - . / $ 0 1

* 2 3 2 " !! # $ % & $ ' % ( ) * + , - . / $ 0 1

* 2 3 2 " "! # $ % & $ ' % ( ) * + , - . / $ 0 1

* 2 3 2 " #! # $ % & $ ' % ( ) * + , - . / $ 0 1

* 2 3 2 " $! # $ % & $ ' % ( ) * + , - . / $ 0 1

* 2 3 2 " %! # $ % & $ ' % ( ) * + , - . / $ 0 1

* 2 3 2 " &! # $ % & $ ' % ( ) * + , - . / $ 0 1

* 2 3 2 " '! # $ % & $ ' % ( ) * + , - . / $ 0 1

* 2 3 2 " (! # $ % & $ ' % ( ) * + , - . / $ 0 1

* 2 3 2 # )! # $ % & $ ' % ( ) * + , - . / $ 0 1

* 2 3 2 #! # $ % & $ ' % ( ) * + , - . / $ 0 1

* 2 3 2 # !! # $ % & $ ' % ( ) * + , - . / $ 0 1

* 2 3 2 # "! # $ % & $ ' % ( ) * + , - . / $ 0 1

* 2 3 2 # #! # $ % & $ ' % ( ) * + , - . / $ 0 1

* 2 3 2 # $! # $ % & $ ' % ( ) * + , - . / $ 0 1

* 2 3 2 # %! # $ % & $ ' % ( ) * + , - . / $ 0 1

* 2 3 2 # &! # $ % & $ ' % ( ) * + , - . / $ 0 1

* 2 3 2 # '! # $ % & $ ' % ( ) * + , - . / $ 0 1

* 2 3 2 # (! # $ % & $ ' % ( ) * + , - . / $ 0 1

* 2 3 2 $ )! # $ % & $ ' % ( ) * + , - . / $ 0 1

* 2 3 2 $

4 $ ( ' 5 0 $ 4 $ &

- & . &

6 7 $ 0 .! # $ % & $ ' % ( ) * + , - . / $ 0 1

* 2 3 2 $ !

8 $ 9 : , ; $ <

= > ? @ < A < = ? B C D A < @ D E A ? F ? A A + B < = > A + D + = = < A C C G H = + D C D G

= > I J 3 I + A K L ? @ H < = < = L
= ? B C D > E + M E L L C E + K > = + + N G C L ? C O

O < L ? = F C D < M +
Exhibit 32
                    CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                         18 U.S.C. 1350,
                     AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
          SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In  connection with the Annual Report of AEI Income & Growth Fund
26  LLC  (the  "Company")  on  Form 10-K  for  the  period  ended
December  31,  2010,  as filed with the Securities  and  Exchange
Commission  on  the date hereof (the "Report"), the  undersigned,
Robert  P.  Johnson, President of AEI Fund Management XXI,  Inc.,
the  Managing Member of the Company, and Patrick W. Keene,  Chief
Financial Officer of AEI Fund Management XXI, Inc., each certify,
pursuant  to  18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section  906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     1.   The  Report  fully  complies with the  requirements  of
          Section  13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange  Act
          of 1934; and

     2.   The   information  contained  in  the   Report   fairly
          presents,  in  all  material  respects,  the  financial
          condition and results of operations of the Company.



                           /s/ROBERT P JOHNSON
                              Robert P. Johnson, President
                              AEI Fund Management XXI, Inc.
                              Managing Member
                              March 25, 2011




                           /s/PATRICK W KEENE
                              Patrick W. Keene, Chief Financial Officer
                              AEI Fund Management XXI, Inc.
                              Managing Member
                              March 25, 2011
§ 411.625 Can the beneficiary or the EN that is not a State VR agency request a review of the PM's recommendation? ( a ) Yes. After receiving the PM's recommendation, either the beneficiary or the EN may request a review by us. The request must be in writing and received by the PM within 15 working days of the receipt of the PM's recommendation for resolving the dispute.
( b ) The PM has 10 working days to refer the request for a review to us. The request for a review must include: ( 1 ) A copy of the beneficiary's IWP;
( 2 ) Information and evidence related to the disputed issue(s); and
( 3 ) The PM's conclusion(s) and recommendation(s).
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY HIGH

 147

 144

 156

 144

 147

 142

 140

 152

 158

 173

 191

 199

 215

 187

 215

 212

 175

 166

 165

 165

 177

 207

 235

 223

 247

 243

 232

 252

 223

 219

 182

 123

 120

 118

 121

 118

 116

 116

 116

 118

 117

 98

 113

 116

 112

 109

 109

 112

 114

 118

 116

 122

 121

 120

 119

 126

 118

 119

 116

 121

 118

 118

 134

 131

 131

 130

 131

 129

 128

 128

 130

 135

 136

 142

 147

 140

 142

 141

 136

 135

 137

 138

 142

 150

 158

 162

 170

 165

 162

 164

 157

 152

 145

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

JULY 2003 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: August 7, 2003

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

SAN ANDREAS ON THE SAN JOAQUIN RIVER
#### § 418.2305 What is not an initial determination regarding your income-related monthly adjustment amount?

We will follow the rules in § 418.1305, except that any references in that section to regulations in subpart B of this part shall be treated as references to the corresponding regulation in this subpart.