alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 8.1

List of Our Subsidiaries*

Beijing Yuande Bio-Medical Engineering Co., Ltd., incorporated in the PRC

Beijing GP Medical Technologies Co., Ltd., incorporated in the PRC

Beijing Bio-Ekon
Biotechnology Co., Ltd., incorporated in the PRC

CMED Technologies Ltd, incorporated in the British Virgin Islands

CMED Diagnostics Ltd., incorporated in the British Virgin Islands

CMED ECLIA Diagnostic Technology Ltd, incorporated in the British Virgin Islands

CMED
International Ltd, incorporated in the British Virgin Islands

CMED South East Asia Ltd, incorporated in the British Virgin Islands

Clear Castle Investments Limited, incorporated in the British Virgin Islands

CMED (HK) Limited, incorporated in Hong Kong

CMED Diagnostics (Hong Kong) Limited, incorporated
in Hong Kong

CMED ECLIA Diagnostic Technology (Hong Kong) Limited, incorporated in Hong Kong

East Crest Enterprises Limited, incorporated in Hong Kong

CMT Diagnostics (Singapore) Pte. Ltd., incorporated in Singapore



|* | Our subsidiaries that, in the aggregate, would not be a significant subsidiary as defined in rule 1-02(w) of Regulation S-X as of March 31, 2011 are
omitted from this list.
|- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
```

[Congressional Bills 114th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 4238 Engrossed in House (EH)]

<DOC>
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
114th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 4238

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
To amend the Department of Energy Organization Act and the Local Public 
Works Capital Development and Investment Act of 1976 to modernize terms 
                        relating to minorities.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. MODERNIZATION OF TERMS RELATING TO MINORITIES.

    (a) Office of Minority Economic Impact.--Section 211(f)(1) of the 
Department of Energy Organization Act (42 U.S.C. 7141(f)(1)) is amended 
by striking ``a Negro, Puerto Rican, American Indian, Eskimo, Oriental, 
or Aleut or is a Spanish speaking individual of Spanish descent'' and 
inserting ``Asian American, Native Hawaiian, a Pacific Islander, 
African American, Hispanic, Puerto Rican, Native American, or an Alaska 
Native''.
    (b) Minority Business Enterprises.--Section 106(f)(2) of the Local 
Public Works Capital Development and Investment Act of 1976 (42 U.S.C. 
6705(f)(2)) is amended by striking ``Negroes, Spanish-speaking, 
Orientals, Indians, Eskimos, and Aleuts'' and inserting ``Asian 
American, Native Hawaiian, Pacific Islanders, African American, 
Hispanic, Native American, or Alaska Natives''.

            Passed the House of Representatives February 29, 2016.

            Attest:

                                                                 Clerk.
114th CONGRESS

  2d Session

                               H. R. 4238

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

To amend the Department of Energy Organization Act and the Local Public 
Works Capital Development and Investment Act of 1976 to modernize terms 
                        relating to minorities.
```
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY HIGH

 170

 179

 175

 172

 177

 176

 162

 154

 162

 150

 181

 185

 203

 176

 204

 212

 203

 190

 172

 182

 181

 147

 156

 141

 155

 161

 179

 154

 146

 152

 143

 124

 114

 104

 105

 123

 109

 114

 107

 110

 114

 121

 113

 112

 110

 113

 118

 108

 108

 115

 107

 71

 109

 101

 102

 103

 105

 101

 101

 94

 99

 94

 136

 138

 133

 133

 137

 134

 132

 130

 131

 132

 142

 140

 141

 135

 140

 140

 142

 135

 136

 135

 132

 127

 121

 116

 119

 122

 122

 118

 116

 116

 115

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

JULY 2000 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: August 2, 2000

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

SAN ANDREAS ON THE SAN JOAQUIN RIVER
### §283dd. Restrictions

(a) 1 Unless authorized by law, neither the President nor any person or agency shall, on behalf of the United States—

(1) subscribe to additional shares of stock of the Corporation;

(2) vote for or agree to any amendment of the agreement which increases the obligations of the United States, or which changes the purpose or functions of the Corporation; or

(3) make a loan or provide other financing to the Corporation.

(Pub. L. 98–473, title I, §101(1) [title I], Oct. 12, 1984, 98 Stat. 1884, 1885.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section is based on section 205 of title II of S. 2416, Ninety-eighth Congress, as introduced Mar. 13, 1984, and enacted into law by Pub. L. 98–473.

1 So in original. No subsec. (b) has been enacted.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 12-8111

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

v.

DAMON EMANUEL ELLIOTT,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of 

Maryland, at Greenbelt. Peter J. Messitte, Senior District 

Judge. (8:97-cr-00053-PJM-1; 8:12-cv-03289-PJM)

Submitted: February 21, 2013 Decided: February 26, 2013

Before AGEE and DAVIS, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior 

Circuit Judge.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Damon Emanuel Elliott, Appellant Pro Se. Ronald Jay Tenpas, 

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Greenbelt, Maryland, for 

Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Damon Emanuel Elliott seeks to appeal the district 

court’s order dismissing as successive his 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 

(West Supp. 2012) motion. The order is not appealable unless a 

circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability.

28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1)(B) (2006). A certificate of 

appealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of 

the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) 

(2006). When the district court denies relief on the merits, a 

prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that 

reasonable jurists would find that the district court’s 

assessment of the constitutional claims is debatable or wrong. 

Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000); see Miller–El v. 

Cockrell, 537 U.S. 322, 336–38 (2003). When the district court 

denies relief on procedural grounds, the prisoner must 

demonstrate both that the dispositive procedural ruling is 

debatable, and that the motion states a debatable claim of the 

denial of a constitutional right. Slack, 529 U.S. at 484–85.

We have independently reviewed the record and conclude 

that Elliott has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, 

we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. 

We dispense with oral argument because the facts and 

legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials 
3

before this court and argument would not aid the decisional 

process.

DISMISSED
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY HIGH

 345

 574

 571

 658

 664

 669

 561

 505

 442

 314

 331

 283

 265

 334

 295

 338

 259

 250

 248

 169

 142

 129

 135

 134

 135

 136

 135

 137

 136

 139

 140

 146

 160

 157

 198

 167

 157

 153

 148

 161

 160

 144

 133

 146

 141

 133

 125

 106

 100

 106

 97

 90

 90

 91

 97

 104

 115

 114

 116

 118

 116

 108

 206

 260

 298

 339

 343

 341

 300

 273

 268

 245

 228

 198

 193

 202

 196

 191

 165

 155

 147

 126

 111

 109

 113

 117

 123

 124

 122

 124

 127

 124

 123

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

DECEMBER 2010 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: January 6, 2011

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

SAN ANDREAS ON THE SAN JOAQUIN RIVER
Flight Log

Pre-flight inspection ☐ Yes ☐ No Comment Comment:

Date: Time: Location:

Circle Circle Comment

Weather Good Fair

Visibility Good Fair

Wind Speed Low Medium

Proximity to airport: Airport Notified? ☐ Yes ☐ No

Date: Time:

Phone number: Contact Name:

Proximity to medium traffic road:

Proximity to heavily traveled roadway road:

Proximity to congested population:

Approximate flight duration:

Safety Concerns:

Additional Comments:

Signature _______________________
<page>   EXHIBIT 32.01


CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




In connection with the Quarterly Report of Morgan Stanley
Cornerstone Fund III L.P. (the ?Partnership?) on Form 10-Q for the
period ended June 30, 2006 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the ?Report?), I, Walter
Davis, President, Demeter Management Corporation, the general
partner of the Partnership, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:
(1)	The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
(2)	The information contained in the Report fairly presents,
in all material respects, the financial condition and
results of operations of the Partnership.







By:	  /s/	Walter Davis

Name:		Walter Davis
Title:	President

Date:		August 14, 2006
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 96-1605
BRENDA J. MARKS, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus SUPREME COURT OF VIRGINIA; CHRISTOPHER HUTTON, Commonwealth's Attorney City of Hampton; JAMES C. O'SHIELDS; HAMPTON GENERAL DISTRICT COURT, Eighth Judicial District; HONORABLE HENRY D.KASHOUTY; HONORABLE WILFORD TAYLOR, JR.; HONORABLE WILLIAM C. ANDREWS, III; HARRIETTE SPENCER, Clerk, Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Newport News. Reb ecca B. Smith, District Judge. (CA-95-71-4) Submitted: November 7, 1996 Decided: November 18, 1996 Before RUSSELL and WIDENER, Circuit Judges, and PHILLIPS, Senior Circuit Judge. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Brenda J. Marks, Appellant Pro Se. Peter Robert Messitt, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF VIRGINIA, Richmond, Virginia; Samuel Lawrence Dumville, Virginia Beach, Virginia, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).23 PER CURIAM: Appellant appeals the district court's order denying relief on her 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1994) complaint. We have reviewed the recordand the district court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Marks v. Supreme Court of Virginia , No. CA-95-71-4 (E.D. Va. Mar. 26, 1996). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
#### § 498.126 Settlement.

The Inspector General has exclusive authority to settle any issues or case, without the consent of the administrative law judge or the Commissioner, at any time prior to a final determination. Thereafter, the Commissioner or his or her designee has such exclusive authority.
Editorial Note on Part 416
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 416 appear at 68 FR 53509, Sept. 11, 2003.

§ 416.1170 General. ( a ) *What the alternative is.* If you are blind and meet the requirements in § 416.1171, we use one of two rules to see how much countable income you have. We use whichever of the following rules results in the lower amount of countable income: ( 1 ) The SSI income exclusions in §§ 416.1112 and 416.1124; or
( 2 ) The disregards that would have applied under the State plan for October 1972.
( b ) *State plan.* As used in this subpart, *State plan for October 1972* means a State plan for providing assistance to the blind under title X or XVI (AABD) of the Social Security Act. That plan must have been approved under the provisions of 45 CFR chapter II as in effect for October 1972.
(No. 4145

#### Hannah Greenwald, Claimant, *vs.*State of Illinois, Respondent.

*Opinion filed September 23, 1949.*

Henry J. Samuel, Attorney for Claimant.

Ivan A. Elliott, Attorney General; William J. Colohan, Assistant Attorney General, for Respondent.

Delaney, J.

Claimant, Hannah Greenwald, was employed on April 26, 1948, in the capacity of a claim taker by respondent in the Department of Labor, Division of Tin-employment Compensation. On that day, claimant slipped on a waxed floor at her place of employment in Chicago; claimant sustained a sprained right wrist and injury to her knee.

The record consists of the complaint, departmental report, stipulation, waiver of brief of claimant, and waiver of brief of respondent. -

No jurisdictional question is raised. Respondent and claimant were operating under the Workmen’s. Compensation Act and the accident in question arose- out of and in the course of the employment. ■

Claimant paid the South Chicago Community Hospital $5.00 for X-rays, $160.00 to Dr. Jacob Samuel for professional services, and $3.50 for medicines. She was temporarily and totally disabled from April 26, 1948, to June 7,1948. The respondent has not reimbursed her for her medical expenses nor has it paid any compensation for the temporary period of her total disability.

*21Records show that claimant’s salary was $160.00 per month. She was 53 years of age and had no children under 16 years.

We conclude, therefore, that the claimant is entitled to an award for her medical and doctor hills in the amount of $168.50, and also an award of $117.00 for 6 weeks temporary total disability. The injury having occurred after July 1, 1947, this must be increased 30% making her compensation rate the maximum of $19.50 per week, all of which has accrued, payable forthwith.

The testimony on the hearing before Commissioner Blumenthal was taken by A. M. Rothbart, who has submitted a statement for $11.10 for his services. This charge is reasonable and proper.

An award is made in favor of A. M. Rothbart for stenographic and reporting services in the amount of $11.10, which is payable forthwith.

This award is subject to the approval of the Governor, as provided in Section 3 of “An Act concerning the payment of awards to State employees.”
I 

114TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 3729 

To amend the Public Health Service Act to prohibit certain research on 

human fetal tissue obtained pursuant to an abortion. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

OCTOBER 8, 2015 

Mr. SENSENBRENNER (for himself, Mr. OLSON, and Mr. DUFFY) introduced 

the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Energy and 

Commerce 

A BILL 

To amend the Public Health Service Act to prohibit certain 

research on human fetal tissue obtained pursuant to 

an abortion. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Safe Responsible Eth5 ical Scientific Endeavors Assuring Research for Compas6 sionate Healthcare Act’’ or the ‘‘Safe RESEARCH Act’’. 


asabaliauskas on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 3729 IH

1 SEC. 2. PROHIBITING CERTAIN RESEARCH ON HUMAN 

2 FETAL TISSUE OBTAINED PURSUANT TO AN 

3 ABORTION. 

4 Section 498A of the Public Health Service Act (42 

5 U.S.C. 289g–1) is amended— 

6 (1) in the section heading, by striking ‘‘RE7 SEARCH ON TRANSPLANTATION OF FETAL TISSUE’’ 

8 and inserting ‘‘RESEARCH WITH FETAL TISSUE’’; 

9 (2) by amending subsection (a) to read as fol10 lows: 

11 ‘‘(a) ESTABLISHMENT OF PROGRAM.— 

12 ‘‘(1) IN GENERAL.—The Secretary may conduct 

13 or support research with human fetal tissue. The 

14 Secretary shall conduct or support any such research 

15 in accordance with this section. 

16 ‘‘(2) SOURCE OF TISSUE.—Human fetal tissue 

17 may be used in research carried out under para18 graph (1) only if the tissue is obtained pursuant to 

19 a stillbirth.’’; 

20 (3) in subsection (b)(2)— 

21 (A) by striking subparagraph (A); and 

22 (B) by redesignating subparagraphs (B) 

23 and (C) as subparagraphs (A) and (B), respec24 tively; 

25 (4) in subsection (c)(1)(B), by striking ‘‘may 

26 have been obtained pursuant to a spontaneous or inVerDate Sep 11 2014 22:44 Oct 14, 2015 Jkt 059200 PO 00000 Frm 00002 Fmt 6652 Sfmt 6201 E:\BILLS\H3729.IH H3729

asabaliauskas on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with BILLS
3 

•HR 3729 IH

1 duced abortion or pursuant to a stillbirth’’ and in2 serting ‘‘has been obtained pursuant to a stillbirth’’; 

3 and 

4 (5) in subsection (g), by striking ‘‘after a spon5 taneous or induced abortion, or’’. 

Æ 


asabaliauskas on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with BILLS
EERE Information Center Programs and Offices Search Help More Search Options

Printable Version 

## Clothes Washer Materials in Support of Stakeholder Negotiations This page presents analytical results and tools provided to key stakeholders whom are negotiating potential energy conservation standards for clothes washers. The following documents are available as Adobe Acrobat PDFs. Download Adobe Reader 

### Analytical Results Analytical Results provided on April 15, 2010 ( PDF 232 KB ) Analytical Results provided on May 4, 2010 ( PDF 235 KB ) Analytical Results provided on May 20, 2010 ( PDF 348 KB ) 

### Analytical Tools Life-Cycle Cost and Payback Period Spreadsheets Scenario A ( Zip 1.1 MB ) Scenario B ( Zip 1.1 MB ) Scenario C ( Zip 1.1 MB ) Scenario D ( Zip 1.1 MB )
National Impact Analysis Spreadsheet Scenario A and B ( Excel 2.5 MB ) Scenario C and D ( Excel 2.5 MB )


### Contact Information Stephen Witkowski , P.E. Project Manager (202) 586-7436

Printable Version

Building Technologies Program Home | EERE Home | U.S. Department of Energy Webmaster | Web Site Policies | Security & Privacy | USA.gov Content Last Updated: 06/11/2010 

## Appliances and Commercial Equipment Standards: Clothes Washer Mater... http://www1.eere.energy.gov/buildings/appliance_standards /residential/c...

1 of 1 10/1/2010 2:55 P M
### §286e–1k. Capital stock increase

#### (a) Increase authorized

The United States Governor of the Bank is authorized—

(1) to vote for an increase of 620,000 shares in the authorized capital stock of the Bank; and

(2) to subscribe on behalf of the United States to 116,262 additional shares of the capital stock of the Bank, except that any subscription to such additional shares shall be effective only to such extent or in such amounts as are provided in advance in appropriations Acts.

#### (b) Authorization of appropriations

In order to pay for the increase in the United States subscription to the Bank provided for in this section, there are authorized to be appropriated, without fiscal year limitation, $14,025,266,370, for payment by the Secretary of the Treasury.

(July 31, 1945, ch. 339, §53, as added Pub. L. 100–461, title V, §555, Oct. 1, 1988, 102 Stat. 2268–36.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section 53 of act July 31, 1945, is based on section 1 of H.R. 4645, One Hundredth Congress, as reported Sept. 28, 1988, and enacted into law by Pub. L. 100–461.
(No. 6346

#### Weber, Griffith and Mellican, Inc., Claimant, *vs.*State of Illinois, Departments of Mental Health and General Services, Respondent.

*Opinion filed November 14, 1972.*

Weber, Griffith and Mellican, Inc., Claimant, pro se.

William J. Scott, Attorney General; William E. *133Webber, Assistant Attorney General, for Respondent.

Perlin, C.J.
Exhibit 5.1
 
  
 Re: Registration Statement on Form S-1 (File No. 333-173445)




---



#####
§ 216.43 Effect of a supplemental annuity on other benefits. ( a ) *Employee annuity.* A supplemental annuity that begins after December 31, 1974, does not affect the payment of a regular employee annuity. A supplemental annuity beginning prior to 1975 causes a reduction in the employee annuity as provided by section 3(j) of the Railroad Retirement Act of 1937.
( b ) *Spouse or survivor annuity.* The payment of a supplemental annuity does not affect the amount of a spouse or survivor annuity.
( c ) *Residual lump-sum.* The amount of a supplemental annuity is not deducted from the gross residual lump-sum benefit. See part 234 of this chapter for an explanation of the residual lump-sum benefit.
### §2519. Security investigations

All persons employed or assigned to duties under this chapter shall be investigated to insure that the employment or assignment is consistent with the national interest in accordance with standards and procedures established by the President. If an investigation made pursuant to this section develops any data reflecting that the person who is the subject of the investigation is of questionable loyalty or is a questionable security risk, the investigating agency shall refer the matter to the Federal Bureau of Investigation for the conduct of a full field investigation. The results of that full field investigation shall be furnished to the initial investigating agency, and to the agency by which the subject person is employed, for information and appropriate action. Volunteers shall be deemed employees of the United States Government for the purpose of this section.

(Pub. L. 87–293, title I, §22, Sept. 22, 1961, 75 Stat. 624.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

This chapter, referred to in text, was in the original "this Act", meaning Pub. L. 87–293, Sept. 22, 1961, 75 Stat. 612, known as the Peace Corps Act. For complete classification of this Act to the Code, see Short Title note set out under section 2501 of this title and Tables.

#### **Executive Documents**

#### Delegation of Functions

Functions of President under this section delegated to Director of Peace Corps by section 1–103 of Ex. Ord. No. 12137, May 16, 1979, 44 F.R. 29023, eff. May 16, 1979, set out as a note under section 2501 of this title.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

DAY HIGH

 160

 163

 163

 159

 157

 154

 137

 128

 127

 148

 144

 144

 140

 148

 152

 142

 142

 162

 153

 142

 146

 143

 138

 139

 142

 144

 130

 131

 123

 128

 116

 114

 105

 107

 88

 74

 77

 79

 84

 90

 94

 98

 98

 99

 97

 93

 93

 95

 87

 91

 97

 97

 101

 99

 99

 99

 95

 98

 98

 96

 137

 134

 128

 124

 115

 108

 100

 96

 100

 110

 112

 115

 113

 118

 120

 120

 119

 119

 114

 115

 120

 117

 120

 119

 120

 119

 114

 114

 113

 113

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

APRIL 2006 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: May 2, 2006

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

SAN ANDREAS ON THE SAN JOAQUIN RIVER