alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY ELEV

 1,055.39

 1,055.66

 1,055.87

 1,056.10

 1,056.68

 1,057.15

 1,057.64

 1,059.03

 1,061.49

 1,062.92

 1,063.47

 1,063.57

 1,063.40

 1,063.32

 1,063.22

 1,064.15

 1,062.68

 1,062.76

 1,063.49

 1,064.05

 1,064.29

 1,064.34

 1,064.23

 1,064.64

 1,064.69

 1,064.73

 1,064.65

 1,064.61

 1,064.42

 1,064.34

 1,064.16

 4,214.3

 4,222.0

 4,228.0

 4,234.5

 4,251.1

 4,264.5

 4,278.6

 4,318.6

 4,389.9

 4,431.6

 4,447.7

 4,450.7

 4,445.7

 4,443.3

 4,440.4

 4,467.7

 4,424.6

 4,426.9

 4,448.3

 4,464.7

 4,471.8

 4,473.3

 4,470.0

 4,482.1

 4,483.6

 4,484.8

 4,482.4

 4,481.2

 4,475.6

 4,473.3

 4,468.0

STORAGE

+7.1

+7.7

+6.0

+6.6

+16.6

+13.4

+14.1

+40.0

+71.3

+41.7

+16.1

+2.9

-5.0

-2.3

-2.9

+27.3

-43.1

+2.3

+21.4

+16.4

+7.1

+1.5

-3.2

+12.1

+1.5

+1.2

-2.4

-1.2

-5.6

-2.4

-5.3

CHANGE

 8,013

 8,301

 8,030

 9,285

 12,721

 11,908

 12,581

 24,085

 39,247

 29,213

 22,077

 19,467

 16,865

 17,388

 16,815

 24,523

 16,793

 30,562

 33,808

 27,058

 21,298

 20,027

 18,849

 15,886

 14,704

 14,765

 13,709

 13,399

 11,179

 11,578

 9,247

INFLOW

 4,347

 4,306

 4,861

 5,848

 4,271

 5,038

 5,416

 3,804

 3,211

 8,132

 9,090

 10,415

 9,757

 13,385

 13,469

 10,470

 11,581

 12,164

 13,876

 13,529

 13,766

 14,025

 13,806

 9,259

 12,842

 12,885

 12,760

 13,715

 13,733

 12,663

 11,765

POWER

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

SPILL

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 4,849

 7,348

 9,441

 5,013

 4,644

 235

 26,710

 17,134

 9,090

 5,139

 3,732

 5,059

 6,365

 248

 771

 1,025

 1,877

 0

 0

 0

 0

OUTLET

 83

 125

 159

 134

 101

 93

 76

 102

 103

 60

 9

 225

 181

 173

 181

 52

 233

 86

 61

 104

 234

 200

 312

 287

 348

 261

 261

 278

 269

 104

 156

C.F.S.

 .10

 .15

 .19

 .16

 .12

 .11

 .09

 .12

 .12

 .07

 .01

 .26

 .21

 .20

 .21

 .06

 .27

 .10

 .07

 .12

 .27

 .23

 .36

 .33

 .40

 .30

 .30

 .32

 .31

 .12

 .18

INCHES

 .03

 .00

 .00

 .10

 1.30

 .02

 .35

 .68

 3.35

 .11

 .01

 .00

 .00

 .01

 .01

 .26

 .01

 1.90

 1.25

 .40

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .03

 .00

 .00

PRECIP

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

MAY 2005 SHASTA LAKE DAILY OPERATIONS RUN DATE: October 26, 2005

IN LAKE

EVAPORATION

INCHES

C.F.S.

COMPUTED*

1000 ACRE-FEET

RELEASE - C.F.S.

RIVER

TOTALS +260.9 553,381 308,189 0 108,680 5,051 5.86 9.82

ACRE-FEET +260,900 1,097,631 611,293 0 215,567 10,019

COMMENTS:

* COMPUTED INFLOW IS THE SUM OF CHANGE IN STORAGE, RELEASES AND EVAPORATION.

SUMMARY

RELEASE (ACRE-FEET)

POWER 611,293

SPILL 0

OUTLET

TOTAL

 215,567

 826,860

PRECIPITATION

THIS MONTH =

TO DATE =

 9.82

JULY 1, 2004 65.87

 4,207.2

Table 3
**EXHIBIT 31.1**

 

I, G. Ward Paxton, ChiefExecutive Officer of Intrusion Inc., certify that:

 

(1)                          I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form10-Q of Intrusion Inc.:

 

(2)                          Based on my knowledge, this report does notcontain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a materialfact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances underwhich such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this report;

 

(3)                          Based on my knowledge, the financial statements,and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in allmaterial respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flowsof the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

 

(4)                          The registrant’s other certifying officer(s)and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls andprocedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for theregistrant and have:

 

(a)              Designed such disclosure controls andprocedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designedunder our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to theregistrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us byothers within those entities, particularly during the period in which thisreport is being prepared;

 

(b)             Evaluated the effectiveness of theregistrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this reportour conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls andprocedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on suchevaluation; and

 

(c)              Disclosed in this report any change in theregistrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during theregistrant’s most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or isreasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting; and

 

(5)                          The registrant’s other certifying officer(s)and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal controlover financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committeeof the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalentfunctions):

 

(a)              All significant deficiencies and materialweaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financialreporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’sability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

 

(b)             Any fraud, whether or not material, that involvesmanagement or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’sinternal control over financial reporting.

 

 
| Date:  August 13, 2004 | /s/ G. Ward Paxton      |   |
|----------------------------------|-------------------------|--------|
|                             | G. Ward Paxton          |
|                             | Chief Executive Officer |

 

1

----
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA

FOURTH DISTRICT

E.M. The Mother,

Appellant,

v.

DEPARTMENT OF CHILDREN AND FAMILIES and GUARDIAN AD 

LITEM PROGRAM,

Appellees.

No. 4D19-1815

[March 12, 2020]

Appeal from the Circuit Court for the Seventeenth Judicial Circuit, 

Broward County; Stacey Schulman, Judge; L.T. Case No. 2012-4718 DP.

Antony P. Ryan, Regional Counsel and Richard G. Bartmon, Assistant 

Regional Counsel, West Palm Beach, for appellant.

Thomasina Moore and Samantha Costas Valley, Tallahassee, for 

appellee Guardian Ad Litem. Ashley Moody, Attorney General, 

Tallahassee, and Carolyn Schwarz, Assistant Attorney General, Fort 

Lauderdale, for appellee Department of Children and Families.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.

LEVINE, C.J., MAY and FORST, JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY HIGH

 267

 289

 268

 216

 194

 254

 304

 290

 283

 262

 257

 318

 292

 296

 374

 285

 329

 473

 352

 425

 487

 502

 567

 429

 400

 340

 323

 347

 331

 317

 295

 131

 129

 123

 110

 105

 99

 99

 116

 122

 102

 101

 112

 97

 100

 135

 144

 141

 142

 149

 138

 133

 136

 141

 137

 152

 133

 134

 136

 149

 139

 149

 197

 194

 185

 160

 155

 163

 172

 183

 179

 179

 171

 177

 165

 199

 232

 208

 212

 249

 233

 234

 253

 269

 290

 267

 268

 231

 233

 228

 227

 205

 205

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

OCTOBER 2005 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: November 2, 2005

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

SAN ANDREAS ON THE SAN JOAQUIN RIVER
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDUL CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION (IN THOUSANDS EXCEPT PER
SHARE DATA) EXTRACTED FROM PETROLEUM HEAT AND POWER CO., INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AS OF MARCH 31, 1998 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY
REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1998
<CASH>                                          12,891
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   82,786
<ALLOWANCES>                                     1,783
<INVENTORY>                                     12,379
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               112,568
<PP&E>                                          74,261
<DEPRECIATION>                                  44,481
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 248,777
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           71,915
<BONDS>                                        284,619
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                           32,652
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         2,647
<OTHER-SE>                                   (153,784)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   248,777
<SALES>                                        173,870
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               183,139
<CGS>                                           90,987
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  109,619
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                40,522
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   456
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               8,275
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 24,761
<INCOME-TAX>                                       375
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             24,386
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    26,978
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .96
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .95
        

</TABLE>
### §2394a. Extortion and illegal payments to officials of foreign countries receiving international security assistance

Within 60 days after receiving information which substantiates that officials of a foreign country receiving international security assistance have (1) received illegal or otherwise improper payments from a United States corporation in return for a contract to purchase defense articles or services from such corporation, or (2) extorted, or attempted to extort, money or other things of value in return for actions by officials of that country that permit a United States citizen or corporation to conduct business in that country, the President shall submit to Congress a report outlining the circumstances of such payment or extortion. The report shall contain a recommendation from the President as to whether the United States should continue a security assistance program for that country.

(Pub. L. 94–329, title VI, §607, June 30, 1976, 90 Stat. 768.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section was not enacted as part of Pub. L. 87–195, Sept. 4, 1961, 75 Stat. 424, known as the Foreign Assistance Act of 1961, which comprises this chapter.

#### **Executive Documents**

#### Delegation of Functions

For delegation of functions of President under this section, see Ex. Ord. No. 12163, Sept. 29, 1979, 44 F.R. 56673, as amended, set out as a note under section 2381 of this title.
## COURT OF APPEALS

SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS

FORT WORTH

NO. 02

- 1 3

- 00 051

- CR

Trimyian Barrow a/k/a Trymyian

Barrow

v.

The State of Texas §

§

§

§

§ From t he 297th District Court

o f Tarrant County ( 1264797D )

March 28, 2013

P er C uriam

(nfp)



### J UDGMENT

This court has considered the record on appeal in this case and holds that

the appeal should be dismissed. It is ordered that the appeal is dismissed.

SECOND DISTRICT COURT OF APPEALS

PER CURIAM
**Exhibit 32.1**

 

**Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350,**

**AsAdopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**

 

In connection withthe Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended November 31,2007 (the “Report”) of Immucor, Inc. (the “Registrant”), as filed with theSecurities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, I certify, to the bestof my knowledge, that:

 

(1)       TheReport fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) ofthe Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

 

(2)       Theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant.

 

 
| January 8, 2008 | /s/ Dr. Gioacchino DeChirico  |   |
|----------------------|-------------------------------|--------|
|                 | Dr. Gioacchino DeChirico |
|                 | Chief Executive Officer       |

 

----
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY HIGH

 857

 808

 722

 734

 550

 543

 584

 725

 807

 858

 879

 949

 917

 821

 761

 804

 721

 657

 583

 634

 751

 854

 864

 927

 880

 699

 795

 971

 864

 626

 532

 235

 229

 226

 231

 216

 210

 227

 231

 219

 240

 259

 272

 267

 256

 274

 252

 267

 254

 289

 303

 265

 257

 236

 242

 229

 211

 208

 248

 228

 224

 227

 487

 467

 457

 465

 410

 389

 398

 425

 456

 494

 519

 544

 533

 519

 496

 503

 490

 513

 479

 470

 470

 528

 525

 542

 549

 475

 490

 518

 500

 422

 386

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

JANUARY 2021 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: February 2, 2021

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

SAN ANDREAS ON THE SAN JOAQUIN RIVER
22452 Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 77 / Thursday, April 21, 2011 / Notices 

DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS 

AFFAIRS 

Privacy Act of 1974; Deletion of 

System of Records 

AGENCY: Department of Veterans Affairs. 

ACTION: Notice of deletion. 

Notice is hereby given that the 

Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) is 

deleting a system of records entitled 

‘‘Employee Reporting System for Project 

Administration and Control (Data 

Processing Centers)’’ (10VA31), which 

was first published 42 CFR 49732 dated 

September 27, 1977, and revised at 

47 CFR 20242 dated May 11, 1982. The 

system of records known as ‘‘Employee 

Reporting System for Project 

Administration and Control (Data 

Processing Centers)—VA’’ is obsolete. 

The information was initially developed 

as a means to track project assignments 

and related task assignments and the 

time an employee spends on 

administrative overhead tasks. The 

requirement for VA to maintain this 

system of records no longer exists. 

System records have not been amended 

nor added in several years and, due to 

mandatory routine destruction, in 

accordance with applicable records 

disposition authority, no records exist 

in the system. 

A ‘‘Report of Intention to Publish a 

Federal Register Notice of Deletion of a 

System of Records’’ and an advance 

copy of the system notice have been 

provided to the appropriate 

congressional committees and to the 

Director, Office of Management and 

Budget (OMB), as required by 5 U.S.C. 

552a(r) and guidelines issued by OMB 

(65 CFR 77677), dated December 12, 

2000. This system deletion is effective 

April 21, 2011. 

Approved: March 31, 2011. 

John R. Gingrich, 

Chief of Staff, Department of Veterans Affairs. 

[FR Doc. 2011–9685 Filed 4–20–11; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 8320–01–P 


emcdonald on DSK2BSOYB1PROD with NOTICES
(No. 73-CC-78

#### Xerox Corporation, Claimant, *vs.*State of Illinois, Department of General Services, Respondent.

*Opinion filed April 26, 1973.*

Xerox Corporation, Claimant, pro se.

William J. Scott, Attorney General; Saul R. Wexler, Assistant Attorney General, for Respondent.

Per Curiam.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA

EQUITYTHINK, LLC, A NEVADA LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY, Appellant, vs. 13-H PARTNERSHIP, LLC, A NEW MEXICO PARTNERSHIP, Resnondent. 

### ORDER DISMISSING APPEAL No. 69711



# FILED JUN 0 2 2016 TRACIE K. LINDEMAN CLERK OF SUPREME COURT DEPUTY CLERK Pursuant to the stipulation of the parties, and cause appearing, this appeal is dismissed. The parties shall bear their own costs and attorney fees. NRAP 42(b).

It is so ORDERED. CLERK OF THE SUPREME COURT TRACE K. LINDE 

# Zif

cc: Hon. Leon Aberasturi, District Judge Woodburn & Wedge McDonald Carano Wilson LLP/Reno Third District Court Clerk

SUPREME COURT OF NEVADA CLERK'S ORDER (U1-1947 

### BY: 

## e w 'n

1Co-17 I leS"
Exhibit
15.1











CONSENT
OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM





We
consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement on Form
F-3 (File No 333-147138) of Omega Navigation Enterprises Inc. and in the related
Prospectus, of our report dated July 15, 2010, with respect to the consolidated
financial statements of Omega Navigation Enterprises Inc. included in this
Annual Report (Form 20-F) for the year ended December 31, 2009.








/s/ Ernst
& Young (Hellas) Certified Auditors Accountants S.A.








July 15,
2010


Athens,
Greece





















SK 23286 0002
1116470
Exhibit 99.3
  FORM OF
    NOTICE TO INVESTORS
  CINEMARK USA, INC.
  OFFER TO
    EXCHANGE UP TO $200,000,000 OF ITS
    7.375% SENIOR SUBORDINATED NOTES DUE 2021,
    WHICH HAVE BEEN REGISTERED UNDER THE
    SECURITIES ACT OF 1933,
    AS AMENDED, FOR ANY AND ALL OF ITS OUTSTANDING
    7.375% SENIOR SUBORDINATED NOTES DUE 2021,
    WHICH WERE ISSUED ON JUNE 3, 2011 IN A TRANSACTION EXEMPT
    FROM REGISTRATION UNDER THE SECURITIES ACT OF 1933,
    AS AMENDED
    THE EXCHANGE OFFER AND
    WITHDRAWAL RIGHTS WILL EXPIRE AT MIDNIGHT NEW YORK CITY TIME
    ON          2011
    (THE EXPIRATION DATE) UNLESS THE EXCHANGE OFFER IS
    EXTENDED. TENDERS MAY BE WITHDRAWN PRIOR TO MIDNIGHT NEW YORK
    CITY TIME ON THE EXPIRATION DATE.




---



##### 



2




---



##### 



INSTRUCTIONS
      o
    Please TENDER my Initial Notes held by you for the account or
    benefit of the undersigned. I have identified on a signed
    schedule attached hereto the principal amount of Initial Notes
    to be tendered if I wish to tender less than all of my Initial
    Notes.o
    Please DO NOT TENDER my Initial Notes held by you for the
    account of the undersigned.                      Date          3
# C_2012394EN.01002501.xml

| 20.12.2012 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 394/25 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

20.12.2012

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 394/25

---

Information communicated by Member States regarding closure of fisheries

2012/C 394/08

In accordance with Article 35(3) of Council Regulation (EC) No 1224/2009 of 20 November 2009 establishing a Community control system for ensuring compliance with the rules of the common fisheries policy (1), a decision has been taken to close the fishery as set down in the following table:

1

| Date and time of closure | 30.11.2012 |
| --- | --- |
| Duration | 30.11.2012-31.12.2012 |
| Member State | The Netherlands |
| Stock or group of stocks | SRX/07D. |
| Species | Skates and rays (rajiformes) |
| Zone | EU waters of VIId |
| Type(s) of fishing vessels | — |
| Reference number | FS80TQ43 |

Date and time of closure

30.11.2012

Duration

30.11.2012-31.12.2012

Member State

The Netherlands

Stock or group of stocks

SRX/07D.

Species

Skates and rays (rajiformes)

rajiformes

Zone

EU waters of VIId

Type(s) of fishing vessels

—

Reference number

FS80TQ43

---

(1)  OJ L 343, 22.12.2009, p. 1.

1

---
#### § 10.217 Is COP charged if the employee continues to work, but in a different job that pays less?

If the employee cannot perform the duties of his or her regular position, but instead works in another job with different duties with no loss in pay, then COP is not chargeable. COP must be paid and the days counted against the 45 days authorized by law whenever an actual reduction of pay results from the injury, including a reduction of pay for the employee's normal administrative workweek that results from a change or diminution in his or her duties following an injury. However, this does not include a reduction of pay that is due solely to an employer being prohibited by law from paying extra pay to an employee for work he or she does not actually perform.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY HIGH

 291

 267

 235

 235

 208

 165

 152

 160

 139

 135

 139

 147

 143

 143

 135

 147

 149

 166

 144

 135

 135

 136

 136

 143

 135

 141

 141

 150

 171

 217

 235

 143

 141

 139

 137

 135

 133

 132

 130

 129

 128

 126

 127

 126

 126

 126

 126

 128

 128

 128

 129

 130

 131

 130

 130

 131

 131

 132

 132

 132

 133

 136

 167

 165

 158

 153

 145

 139

 138

 134

 132

 131

 130

 131

 130

 130

 129

 131

 132

 132

 131

 132

 132

 132

 132

 133

 132

 134

 135

 136

 141

 148

 153

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

JULY 2004 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: August 12, 2004

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

RIO VISTA ON THE SACRAMENTO RIVER
(No. 4196

#### Earnie Roberson, Claimant, *vs.*State of Illinois, Respondent.

*Opinion filed October 20, 1949.*

Glenn E. Moore, Attorney for Claimant.

Ivan A. Elliott, Attorney General; C. Arthur Nebel, Assistant Attorney General, for Respondent.

Delaney, J.

On January 8, 1949, claimant was the owner of a 1947 four-door Chevrolet sedan automobile used in claimant’s taxicab business. On said date at approximately 9:00 A.M., claimant by his agent, James D. Joplin, was driving said automobile in a northerly direction on North Main Street near the intersection of Lawrence Street, in the City of Benton, Illinois. On January 8, 1949, about 9:00 A.M., respondent, by its agent, was driving and operating a Ford truck in a southerly direction along North Main Street at the intersection of Lawrence Street in the City of Benton. Said truck being marked State of Illinois, Game Preserve.

The record in this case consists of the complaint, the amendment to complaint, Report of the Department of Conservation, the transcript of testimony, waiver of statement, brief and argument of claimant, and the statement, brief and argument of respondent.

*59The evidence shows that the respondent, by its agent, Harrison Sexton, in following another truck of respondent into a gasoline filling station, made a sharp left hand turn directly in front of claimant’s car, causing respondent’s truck to strike the left front of claimant’s automobile, wherein claimant sustained damage to his said automobile in the amount of $446.98.

The evidence further shows that the claimant’s automobile was repaired in 17 days and that this was a reasonable length of time; that the net daily income of this automobile as a taxicab, after deducting the wages of the driver and the cost of gasoline and oil, was approximately $12.00 per day or a total of $204.00; that as a direct and proximate result of the negligence on the part of the respondent, through its agent, in violation of Section 69 of the Uniform Act Regulating Traffic on Highways, Chapter 95%, Section 166, Illinois Revised Statutes of 1947, claimant is entitled to an award in the sum of $650.98, representing the damages to his automobile and the loss he sustained in his business as the operator of a taxicab while the automobile was being repaired.

The evidence further shows that the claimant was the sole owner of the automobile which was damaged.

An award is, therefore, entered in favor of claimant, Earnie Roberson, for the sum of $650.98.