alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
AHMED ABDUL AZIZ,

Petitioner,

v . BARACK OBAMA, et al. ,

Respondents. : : : : : : : : : Civil Action No. 05-0492 (JR)

ORDER Upon review of Petitioner’s first motion for leave to take discovery, and Respondents’ opposition, requests 1 and 3 (insofar as they request access to an individual for questioning), 7, 16, 21, and 23, are denied , and the remaining requests (including the remaining portions of requests 1 and 3)
are denied without prejudice to a further motion filed with or after Petitioner’s traverse, showing that, for specified reasons, Petitioner cannot present facts essential to justify his traverse. It is SO ORDERED .

JAMES ROBERTSON United States District Judge
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

DAY HIGH

 175

 226

 455

 363

 305

 551

 1,091

 756

 681

 417

 1,639

 1,063

 397

 230

 655

 2,380

 4,722

 5,562

 5,093

 8,201

 8,678

 9,805

 11,726

 9,748

 7,480

 9,519

 8,475

 5,718

 5,573

 4,180

 140

 144

 143

 150

 153

 154

 168

 170

 175

 174

 178

 177

 178

 172

 175

 221

 338

 226

 269

 373

 540

 707

 693

 545

 386

 491

 533

 435

 355

 267

 150

 158

 188

 195

 181

 234

 404

 339

 287

 238

 348

 278

 225

 192

 257

 1,128

 1,843

 2,625

 2,149

 3,269

 3,525

 3,966

 4,591

 3,986

 3,195

 3,332

 3,194

 2,560

 2,282

 1,718

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

APRIL 2005 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: May 12, 2005

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

PORT CHICAGO TOP IN SUISUN BAY
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

November 19, 2021

No. 04-21-00354-CV

IN THE INTEREST OF S.E.L.P., A CHILD,

From the 224th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2020-PA-01434

The Honorable Kimberly Burley, Judge Presiding

O R D E R

Appellee’s brief was originally due November 16, 2021. On November 18, 2021, 

appellee filed a motion requesting a two-day extension of time to file its brief. Appellee also 

filed its brief alongside the motion for extension of time. After consideration, we GRANT

appellee’s motion for extension of time and deem its brief timely filed as of November 18, 2021.

It is so ORDERED November 19, 2021.

PER CURIAM

ATTESTED TO:__________________________

 MICHAEL A. CRUZ, 

 CLERK OF COURT
(No. 74-CC-506

#### Mobil Oil Corporation, Claimant, *vs.*State of Illinois, Department of Transportation, Respondent.

*Opinion filed June 5, 1974.*

Giffin, Winning, Lindner, Newkirk, Cohen, Bodewes & Narmont, Attorney for Claimant.

William J. Scott, Attorney General; Howard W. Feldman, Assistant Attorney General, for Respondent.

Per Curiam.
### §277d–43. Definitions

In sections 277d–43 to 277d–46 of this title, the following definitions apply:

#### (1) Administrator

The term "Administrator" means the Administrator of the Environmental Protection Agency.

#### (2) Commission

The term "Commission" means the United States section of the International Boundary and Water Commission, United States and Mexico.

#### (3) IWTP

The term "IWTP" means the South Bay International Wastewater Treatment Plant constructed under the provisions of the Federal Water Pollution Control Act (33 U.S.C. 1251 et seq.), section 510 of the Water Quality Act of 1987 (101 Stat. 80–82), and Treaty Minutes to the Treaty for the Utilization of Waters of the Colorado and Tijuana Rivers and of the Rio Grande, dated February 3, 1944.

#### (4) Secondary treatment

The term "secondary treatment" has the meaning such term has under the Federal Water Pollution Control Act and its implementing regulations.

#### (5) Secretary

The term "Secretary" means the Secretary of State.

#### (6) Mexican facility

The term "Mexican facility" means a proposed public-private wastewater treatment facility to be constructed and operated under sections 277d–43 to 277d–46 of this title within Mexico for the purpose of treating sewage flows generated within Mexico, which flows impact the surface waters, health, and safety of the United States and Mexico.

#### (7) Mgd

The term "mgd" means million gallons per day.

(Pub. L. 106–457, title VIII, §803, Nov. 7, 2000, 114 Stat. 1977.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

The Federal Water Pollution Control Act, referred to in pars. (3) and (4), is act June 30, 1948, ch. 758, as amended generally by Pub. L. 92–500, §2, Oct. 18, 1972, 86 Stat. 816, which is classified generally to chapter 26 (§1251 et seq.) of Title 33, Navigation and Navigable Waters. For complete classification of this Act to the Code, see Short Title note set out under section 1251 of Title 33 and Tables.

Section 510 of the Water Quality Act of 1987, referred to in par. (3), is section 510 of Pub. L. 100–4, title V, Feb. 4, 1987, 101 Stat. 80, which is not classified to the Code.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Short Title

Pub. L. 106–457, title VIII, §801, Nov. 7, 2000, 114 Stat. 1977, provided that: "This title [enacting this section and sections 277d–44 to 277d–46 of this title] may be cited as the 'Tijuana River Valley Estuary and Beach Sewage Cleanup Act of 2000'."

#### Purpose

Pub. L. 106–457, title VIII, §802, Nov. 7, 2000, 114 Stat. 1977, provided that: "The purpose of this title [see Short Title note above] is to authorize the United States to take actions to address comprehensively the treatment of sewage emanating from the Tijuana River area, Mexico, that flows untreated or partially treated into the United States causing significant adverse public health and environmental impacts."
##### 



(HBU LOGO)
 AMENDMENT AGREEMENT
 The undersigned:
 1.
    
    Adventure Two S.A., established in Majuro, Marshall
Islands,
hereinafter referred to as the Borrower,
 2.
    
    HOLLANDSCHE BANK-UNIE N.V., having its registered office in Amsterdam, the
Netherlands, hereinafter referred to as HBU
 whereas
 -
    
    the Borrower and HBU entered into a credit agreement on 23/26 September 2005,
hereinafter
referred to as the Credit Agreement, to which the terms and conditions stated in the Credit
Agreement apply;
 -
    
    the Borrower and HBU wish to amend the conditions of the Credit Agreement in the manner
described below and otherwise wish to continue the Credit Agreement unaltered;
 have agreed as follows:
 Security and covenants
 Security and covenants
 -
    
    All moneys mortgage, on the vessel m.v. Free Destiny , registered under the flag
of the
Marshall Islands. IMO number 8128157, call letters V7GD8. Fuller details are
included in the mortgage deed. On this mortgage the laws of the Marshall Islands will be
applicable.As far as possible HBUs General Conditions applicable to Ship Mortgages are
incorporated in the mortgage deed.-
    
    Joint and several liability Adventure Three S.A.-
    
    Corporate guarantee of USD 500,000, plus interest and costs, from FreeSeas Inc.,
established
in Majuro, Marshall Islands.          (new)-
    
    Pledge of rights and earnings under time charter contracts concluded or to be concluded.-
    
    Pledge of rights under hull and machinery insurance policy.-
    
    Pledge of rights under protection and indemnity risk insurance policy.-
    
    Pursuant to Art. 18 of the HBU General Banking Conditions HBU has a right of pledge on
all goods and documents of title which are in possession or will come into the possession of
HBU or a third party on HBUs behalf from or for the benefit of the Borrower on any
account whatsoever and on all present or future claims of the Borrower vis-a-vis HBU on
any account whatsoever to secure any obligations of the Borrower to HBU on any account
whatsoever.
 HOLLANDSCHE BANK-UNIE N.V.Handelsregister K.v.K. Amsterdam nr 33259495B.T.W. ident.nr. NL 00.30.27.144.B01




---



##### 



(HBU LOGO)
     /s/
[ILLEGIBLE]
  /s/
[ILLEGIBLE]
    
    
    
    /s/ [ILLEGIBLE]Adventure Two S.A.
 HOLLANDSCHE BANK-UNIE N.V.Handelsregister K.v.K. Amsterdam nr 33259495B.T.W. ident.nr. NL 00.30.27.144.B01
#### Jeremiah Haak, Respondent, v. Buffalo, Rochester and Pittsburgh Railway Company, Appellant.

Order reversed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and motion granted, with ten dollars costs. All concurred, except Kruse, P. J., who dissented; Foote, J., not sitting.
#### In the Matter of Robert H. Wilson, an Attorney.

Ordered that the charges annexed to the moving papers be filed and that a copy thereof be personally delivered to said Robert H. Wilson, as provided by the Judiciary Law (§ 476)†, and that he have twenty days thereafter in which-to file his answers to the same, or otherwise to present his defense thereto. The further disposition of the motion is reserved until after the filing of such answers or defense. The counsel heretofore designated to present charges, to wit, William R. Dykman, Esq., and Stephen C. Baldwin, Esq., are now severally discharged and relieved from further duties in the matter. Present—Jenks, P. J., Thomas, Carr, Rich and Putnam, JJ.

†

 Consol. Laws, chap. 30 (Laws of 1909, chap. 35), § 476.—[Rep.
§ 422.809 Collection in installments. Whenever feasible, we will collect the total amount of a debt in one lump sum payment. If a debtor claims a financial inability to pay a debt in one lump sum, by funds or Administrative Offset, we may accept payment in regular installments provided the debtor establishes the financial need and no evidence indicates that fraud or similar fault affected the debt. We will request financial statements from debtors who represent that they are unable to pay in one lump sum and independently verify such representations as described in § 422.846. ( a ) When we agree to accept payments in regular installments, we will obtain a legally enforceable written agreement from the debtor that specifies all the terms and conditions of the agreement and includes a provision accelerating the debt in the event of a default.
( b ) The size and frequency of the payments will reasonably relate to the size of the debt and the debtor's ability to pay. Whenever feasible, the installment agreement will provide for full payment of the debt, including interest and charges, in three years or less.
( c ) When appropriate, the agreement will include a provision identifying security obtained from the debtor for the deferred payments, such as a surety bond or confession of judgment supporting a lien on any property of the debtor.
( d ) An approved installment agreement does not prevent the use of Administrative Wage Garnishment or other collection tools in this subpart.
Editorial Note on Part 416
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 416 appear at 68 FR 53509, Sept. 11, 2003.

§ 416.1492 Notice of revised determination or decision. ( a ) When a determination or decision is revised, notice of the revision will be mailed to the parties at their last known address. The notice will state the basis for the revised determination or decision and the effect of the revision. The notice will also inform the parties of the right to further review.
( b ) If a determination is revised and the revised determination requires that your benefits be suspended, reduced, or terminated, the notice will inform you of your right to continued payment (see § 416.1336 and the exceptions set out in § 416.1337) and of your right of reconsideration.
( c ) If a determination is revised and the revised determination does not require that your benefits be suspended, reduced, or terminated, the notice will inform you of your right to a hearing before an administrative law judge.
( d ) If a reconsidered determination that you are blind or disabled, based on medical factors, is reopened for the purpose of being revised, you will be notified, in writing, of the proposed revision and of your right to request that a disability hearing be held before a revised reconsidered determination is issued. If a revised reconsidered determination is issued, you may request a hearing before an administrative law judge.
( e ) If an administrative law judge or the Appeals Council proposes to revise a decision, and the revision would be based on evidence not included in the record on which the prior decision was based, you and any other parties to the decision will be notified, in writing, of the proposed action and of your right to request that a hearing be held before any further action is taken. If a revised decision is issued by an administrative law judge, you and any other party may request that it be reviewed by the Appeals Council, or the Appeals Council may review the decision on its own initiative.
( f ) If an administrative law judge or the Appeals Council proposes to revise a decision, and the revision would be based only on evidence included in the record on which the prior decision was based, you and any other parties to the decision will be notified, in writing, of the proposed action. If a revised decision is issued by an administrative law judge, you and any other party may request that it be reviewed by the Appeals Council, or the Appeals Council may review the decision on its own initiative.
( g ) An administrative law judge may, in connection with a valid request for a hearing, propose to reopen an issue other than the issue on which the request for a hearing was based. The administrative law judge will follow the time limits for reopenings set out in § 416.1488. The administrative law judge shall mail to the parties at their last known address a notice of the reopening.
[45 FR 52096, Aug. 5, 1980, as amended at 51 FR 308, Jan. 3, 1986]
## SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK



## Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department

**553**

**CA 13**

**- 01126** 

PRESENT: SCUDDER, P.J., FAHEY, LINDLEY, VALENTINO, AND WHALEN, JJ.

STATE BANK OF TEXAS, PLAINTIFF

- RESPONDENT,

V MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

KAANAM, LLC, DEFENDANT,

MILIND K. OZA AND NAYNA M. OZA,

DEFENDANTS

- APPELLANTS.

(APPEAL NO. 2.)

LAW OFFICE OF CARL E. PERSON, NEW YORK CITY (CARL E. PERS ON OF COUNSEL),

FOR DEFENDANTS

- APPELLANTS.

MORRISROE HEBERT LLP, BUFFALO (RICHARD J. MORRISROE OF COUNSEL), FOR

PLAINTIFF

- RESPONDENT.

Appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Cha utauqua County (John

A. Michalek, J.), entered September 25, 2012. The order denied the motion

of defendants Milind K. Oza and Nayna M. Oza seeking, inter alia, leave

to renew.

It is hereby ORDERED that said appeal is unanimously dismissed without

cost s.

Same Memorandum as in State Bank of Texas v Kaanam, LLC ([appeal

No. 1] ___ AD3d ___ [Aug. 8, 2014]).

Entered: August 8, 2014 Frances E. Cafarell

Clerk of the Court
**EXHIBIT 12.2**

 

**COMPUTATION OF RATIO OF EARNINGS TO FIXED CHARGES**

 

**PURSUANT TO THE SUPPORT AGREEMENT**

**BETWEEN THE COMPANY AND PACCAR**

(Millions of Dollars)

 
| ** **                         | ** ** | **Six Months Ended** | ** ** |
|------------------------------------|------------|----------------------|------------|
| ** **                         | ** ** | **June 30**     | ** ** |
| ** **                         | ** ** | **2006**             | ** ** | **2005** | ** ** |
|                               |       |                 |       |   |   |
| FIXED CHARGES                      |       |                 |       |   |   |
| Interest expense                   | ** ** | **$**                | **73.3**   |   | $ | 43.1 |   |
| Facility and  equipment rental     | ** ** | **1.0**              |       | 1.0 |   |
|                               |       |                 |       |   |   |
| TOTAL FIXED CHARGES                | ** ** | **$**                | **74.3**   |   | $ | 44.1 |   |
|                               |       |                 |       |   |   |
| EARNINGS                           |       |                 |       |   |   |
| Income before  taxes               | ** ** | **$**                | **66.6**   |   | $ | 58.4 |   |
| Depreciation                       | ** ** | **37.8**             |       | 32.1 |   |
|                               | ** ** | **104.4**            |       | 90.5 |   |
|                               |       |                 |       |   |   |
| Fixed charges                      | ** ** | **74.3**             |       | 44.1 |   |
|                               |       |                 |       |   |   |
| EARNINGS AS DEFINED                | ** ** | **$**                | **178.7**  |   | $ | 134.6 |   |
|                               |       |                 |       |   |   |
| RATIO OF EARNINGS TO FIXED CHARGES | ** ** | **2.41**             | **X**      | 3.05 | X |

 

1

----
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY HIGH

 5,988

 5,587

 5,837

 7,300

 5,770

 5,506

 9,817

 10,714

 2,019

 429

 266

 215

 191

 170

 169

 163

 151

 157

 219

 208

 210

 201

 219

 212

 201

 213

 205

 207

 212

 205

 209

 321

 345

 348

 514

 295

 265

 258

 292

 236

 230

 180

 169

 132

 126

 125

 124

 127

 131

 143

 142

 157

 160

 158

 167

 159

 160

 162

 161

 161

 169

 177

 2,350

 2,090

 2,552

 3,014

 1,926

 1,396

 2,022

 2,874

 632

 306

 229

 188

 162

 150

 143

 141

 139

 141

 168

 169

 178

 176

 185

 182

 173

 173

 173

 172

 173

 180

 187

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

JANUARY 2017 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: February 1, 2017

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

PORT CHICAGO TOP IN SUISUN BAY
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY HIGH

 190

 207

 222

 209

 204

 218

 212

 215

 189

 192

 196

 240

 281

 298

 339

 317

 368

 378

 307

 264

 242

 222

 263

 330

 318

 338

 347

 396

 423

 409

 371

 133

 134

 134

 135

 136

 137

 135

 132

 135

 133

 134

 135

 138

 141

 140

 140

 145

 150

 150

 145

 142

 140

 144

 146

 146

 137

 145

 140

 145

 139

 134

 149

 150

 155

 158

 157

 160

 160

 162

 158

 156

 154

 160

 181

 194

 201

 195

 205

 214

 204

 188

 179

 173

 181

 195

 195

 193

 200

 211

 215

 208

 209

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

AUGUST 2005 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: September 12, 2005

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

SAN ANDREAS ON THE SAN JOAQUIN RIVER
Exhibit21

SUBSIDIARIES OF JAMES RIVER GROUP,INC.

|                                             |  |                       |  |  |  |  |
|---------------------------------------------|--|-----------------------|--|--|--|--|
| Name                                        |  | Stateof Incorporation |
| JamesRiver InsuranceCompany                 |  | Ohio                  |
| JamesRiver Management Company,Inc.          |  | Delaware              |
| Potomac Risk Services,Inc.                  |  | Virginia              |
| Stonewood InsuranceCompany                  |  | North Carolina        |
| Stonewood InsuranceManagement Company, Inc. |  | Delaware              |
| JamesRiver Capital Trust I                  |  | Delaware              |
| James RiverCapital TrustII                  |  | Delaware              |
|                                             |

----
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1997
<CASH>                                       1,719,793
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  237,487
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                      33,403,774
<DEPRECIATION>                            (15,786,660)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              23,482,325
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0
<BONDS>                                     22,329,173
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                 (5,215,867)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                23,482,325
<SALES>                                      4,855,619
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             4,983,787
<CGS>                                        2,481,109
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                3,606,753
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               577,931
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           1,593,992
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (794,889)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          (794,889)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (794,889)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>