alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from Century
Properties Fund XX 1999 First Quarter 10-QSB and is qualified in its entirety by
reference to such 10-QSB filing.
</LEGEND>
<CIK> 0000736909
<NAME> CENTURY PROPERTIES FUND XX
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1999
<CASH>                                           8,246
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0<F1>
<PP&E>                                          50,518
<DEPRECIATION>                                  20,077
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  42,039
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0<F1>
<BONDS>                                         31,386
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                     (8,405)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    42,039
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 2,196
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 2,238
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 628
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                      0
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                      (42)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.66)<F2>
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
<FN>
<F1>Registrant has an unclassified balance sheet.
<F2>Multiplier is 1.
</FN>
        

</TABLE>
§ 418.2125 How will the income-related monthly adjustment amount affect your total Medicare prescription drug coverage premium? ( a ) If you must pay an income-related monthly adjustment amount, your total Medicare prescription drug coverage premium will be the sum of: ( 1 ) Your prescription drug coverage monthly premium, as determined by your plan; plus
( 2 ) Any applicable increase in the prescription drug coverage monthly premium as described in 42 CFR 423.286; plus
( 3 ) Your income-related monthly adjustment amount.
( b ) Regardless of the method you use to pay your Medicare prescription drug coverage premiums to your Medicare prescription drug coverage plan, you will pay any income-related monthly adjustment amount you owe using the method described in 418.2112.
**Exhibit 32.1**

 

**Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350,**

**As Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**

 

Inconnection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended November 30,2005 (the “Report”) of Immucor, Inc. (the “Registrant”), as filed with theSecurities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, I certify, to the bestof my knowledge, that:

 

(1)                                  TheReport fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) ofthe Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

 

(2)                                  Theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant.

 

 
| January 6, 2006 | /s/ Edward L. Gallup    |   |
|----------------------|-------------------------|--------|
|                 | Edward L. Gallup        |
|                 | Chief Executive Officer |

 

----
§ 364.3 Publication of missing children information in the Railroad Retirement Board's in-house publications. ( a ) *All-A-Board.* Information about missing children will appear in the All-A-Board. This publication will obtain the necessary information from the National Center for Missing and Exploited Children. The editorial staff of the All-A-Board shall determine the number of children described in each issue and where this information will appear in the publication.
( b ) *Other in-house publications.* The Board may publish missing children information in other in-house publications as it deems appropriate. This determination will be made in accordance with the guidelines that appear in § 364.5.
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent

except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 96-11051

Conference Calendar

 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

ROBERTO MARTINEZ,

Defendant-Appellant.

- - - - - - - - - -

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Northern District of Texas

USDC No. 3:96-CR-117-R

- - - - - - - - - -

October 21, 1997

Before POLITZ, Chief Judge, and WIENER and DENNIS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Appellant Roberto Martinez appeals his sentence for

conspiracy to distribute methamphetamine. He argues that the

district court erred: 1) in refusing to give him a 3-point

adjustment for acceptance of responsibility; 2) in calculating

the amount of drugs, because it impermissibly included quantities

of drugs not specified in the count of conviction; and 3) in

giving him a four-level enhancement for being a leader in the
No. 96-11051

-2-

conspiracy because there was inadequate evidence to support such. 

 The Government’s motion to dismiss the appeal because

Martinez waived his right to appeal on the grounds raised is

GRANTED. See United States v. Portillo, 18 F.3d 290, 292-93 (5th

Cir. 1994).

 MOTION GRANTED; APPEAL DISMISSED.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY HIGH

 200

 180

 170

 173

 186

 229

 211

 201

 207

 198

 183

 166

 162

 164

 169

 203

 166

 198

 230

 347

 379

 356

 272

 239

 235

 231

 232

 255

 285

 286

 252

 143

 148

 151

 152

 151

 155

 150

 158

 156

 149

 146

 138

 118

 127

 130

 134

 132

 134

 139

 145

 147

 149

 151

 154

 156

 159

 158

 160

 158

 161

 159

 156

 158

 160

 163

 166

 172

 168

 169

 169

 165

 157

 146

 141

 142

 144

 148

 141

 148

 158

 178

 181

 179

 171

 172

 177

 171

 169

 172

 176

 181

 176

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

JULY 2001 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: August 7, 2001

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

RIO VISTA ON THE SACRAMENTO RIVER
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY HIGH

 684

 424

 784

 601

 708

 645

 511

 383

 322

 343

 538

 487

 729

 609

 507

 665

 691

 707

 738

 774

 736

 672

 537

 643

 759

 920

 912

 990

 1,072

 1,124

 928

 225

 234

 196

 210

 215

 224

 201

 211

 206

 194

 207

 210

 216

 208

 198

 196

 219

 221

 237

 233

 239

 239

 214

 231

 240

 256

 257

 264

 267

 247

 268

 340

 320

 367

 328

 359

 362

 357

 299

 259

 258

 281

 316

 356

 323

 305

 343

 364

 378

 406

 438

 455

 435

 381

 387

 426

 501

 552

 589

 612

 624

 568

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

DECEMBER 2009 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: January 4, 2010

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

SAN ANDREAS ON THE SAN JOAQUIN RIVER
###### Editorial Note on Part 416

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 416 appear at 68 FR 53509, Sept. 11, 2003.

#### § 416.435 Change in status involving a couple; ineligibility occurs.

Whenever benefits are suspended or terminated for both members of a couple because of ineligibility, no benefits are payable for that month. However, when benefits are suspended or terminated for one member of a couple because of ineligibility for a month, the member who remains eligible assumes the eligibility status of an eligible individual without an eligible spouse for such month and the benefit rate and payment amount will be determined as an eligible individual for the month.

[50 FR 48572, Nov. 26, 1985]
COURT OF APPEALS

SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS

FORT WORTH

NO. 02-12-00612-CR 

ANTHONY MARBLEY APPELLANT

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS STATE

------------

FROM COUNTY CRIMINAL COURT NO. 2 OF DENTON COUNTY

------------

ABATEMENT ORDER

------------

We have considered the appellant’s “Motion To Dismiss Appeal” filed by 

Dominick J. Marsala, appellant’s retained counsel on November 22, 2013. The 

motion is not signed by appellant as required by rule of appellate procedure 

42.2(a). See Tex. R. App. P. 42.2(a). In an affidavit attached to his motion, 

retained counsel stated that he has been unsuccessful in contacting his client by 

phone since August 2013, and that appellant’s whereabouts are unknown.

We abate the appeal and remand this case to the trial court. The trial court 

shall immediately conduct a hearing with appellant present to:
1. Determine whether appellant desires to prosecute his appeal;

2. Determine whether appellant desires to proceed pro se; 

3. If appellant desires to proceed pro se, admonish appellant of the 

dangers and disadvantages of self-representation in accordance 

with Faretta v. California, 422 U.S. 806, 835, 95 S. Ct. 2525, 2541

(1975), and Hubbard v. State, 739 S.W.2d 341, 345 (Tex. Crim. App. 

1987); 

4. Determine whether appellant is indigent. If appellant is determined 

to be indigent, ascertain whether counsel should be appointed to 

represent appellant and appoint counsel, if necessary;1

5. If appellant desires to proceed pro se, determine whether that 

decision is competently and intelligently made; and 

6. Take any other measures that the trial court deems necessary to 

insure appellant does not forfeit his right to appeal. 

The trial court shall file a record of the hearing in this court on or before 

Monday, January 20, 2014. The record shall include a supplemental reporter’s 

record and supplemental clerk’s record. Upon our receipt of the supplemental 

record, the appeal of this cause shall be automatically reinstated without further 

order. Appellant’s counsel’s motion will be ruled on at that time.

The clerk of this court shall transmit a copy of this order to appellant, the 

attorneys of record, the trial judge, the trial court clerk, and the court reporter.

DATED December 19, 2013.

PER CURIAM

 

 1If counsel is appointed to represent appellant, the supplemental 

record shall reflect that counsel has been notified of the appointment.
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
 Washington, D.C. 20549
 SCHEDULE 14A
 Proxy Statement Pursuant to Section 14(a) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934
 (Amendment No. )
 þ  o
  o  o Confidential, for Use of the Commission Only (as permitted by Rule 14a-6(e)(2))  o  o  þ
 Forest Laboratories, Inc.
 
  
   þ
    
    No fee required.o
    
    Fee computed on table below per Exchange Act Rules 14a-6(i)(1) and 0-11.
 (1)
    
    Title of each class of securities to which transaction applies:
 
 (2)
    
    Aggregate number of securities to which transaction applies:
 
 (3)
    
    Per unit price or other underlying value of transaction computed pursuant to Exchange Act
Rule 0-11 (set forth the amount on which the filing fee is calculated and state how it was
determined):
 
 (4)
    
    Proposed maximum aggregate value of transaction:
 
 (5)
    
    Total fee paid:
 
 o
    
    Fee paid previously with preliminary materials.o
    
    Check box if any part of the fee is offset as provided by Exchange Act Rule 0-11(a)(2) and
identify the filing for which the offsetting fee was paid previously. Identify the previous filing
by registration statement number, or the Form or Schedule and the date of its filing.
 (1)
    
    Amount Previously Paid:
 
 (2)
    
    Form, Schedule or Registration Statement No.:
 
 (3)
    
    Filing Party:
 
 (4)
    
    Date Filed:




---



##### 



Letter to our Shareholders




---



##### 



Forest Laboratories, Inc.
  1A 1A




---



##### 



Letter to our Shareholders




---



##### 



Forest Laboratories, Inc.




---



##### 



Letter to our Shareholders
     
 Howard Solomon
   Forward
Looking Information
  Important
Additional Information
 FOREST SHAREHOLDERS ARE STRONGLY ENCOURAGED TO READ THE PROXY STATEMENT AND
ACCOMPANYING PROXY CARD AS THEY BECOME AVAILABLE AS THEY CONTAIN IMPORTANT INFORMATION.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

DAY ELEV

 992.95

 992.30

 991.84

 991.26

 990.71

 990.32

 989.80

 989.32

 988.90

 988.48

 988.03

 987.30

 986.77

 986.26

 985.79

 985.40

 984.93

 984.36

 983.92

 983.52

 983.17

 982.69

 982.29

 981.99

 981.51

 981.07

 980.66

 980.20

 979.81

 979.44

 2,677.9

 2,664.4

 2,654.8

 2,642.7

 2,631.3

 2,623.2

 2,612.5

 2,602.6

 2,594.0

 2,585.4

 2,576.2

 2,561.4

 2,550.7

 2,540.3

 2,530.8

 2,523.0

 2,513.5

 2,502.1

 2,493.3

 2,485.4

 2,478.4

 2,468.9

 2,461.0

 2,455.1

 2,445.6

 2,437.0

 2,428.9

 2,419.9

 2,412.3

 2,405.1

STORAGE

-13.4

-13.6

-9.6

-12.1

-11.4

-8.1

-10.7

-9.9

-8.6

-8.6

-9.2

-14.8

-10.7

-10.4

-9.5

-7.8

-9.4

-11.4

-8.8

-8.0

-7.0

-9.5

-7.9

-5.9

-9.4

-8.7

-8.0

-9.0

-7.6

-7.2

CHANGE

 2,012

 2,232

 3,462

 2,965

 2,087

 3,810

 2,764

 3,256

 3,899

 4,238

 3,428

 549

 2,236

 2,789

 2,793

 3,820

 2,753

 2,008

 3,034

 2,563

 2,978

 2,082

 2,355

 3,207

 1,870

 2,536

 2,975

 2,320

 2,959

 3,501

INFLOW

 8,625

 8,874

 8,099

 8,837

 7,628

 7,682

 8,004

 8,039

 8,072

 8,383

 7,870

 7,834

 7,535

 7,879

 7,468

 7,663

 7,421

 7,651

 7,361

 6,458

 6,371

 6,733

 6,251

 6,053

 6,456

 6,727

 6,849

 6,684

 6,655

 7,078

POWER

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

SPILL

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

OUTLET

 166

 209

 202

 208

 207

 194

 170

 193

 175

 186

 198

 167

 119

 137

 119

 112

 94

 106

 106

 117

 117

 146

 93

 145

 174

 173

 173

 172

 143

 57

C.F.S.

 .27

 .34

 .33

 .34

 .34

 .32

 .28

 .32

 .29

 .31

 .33

 .28

 .20

 .23

 .20

 .19

 .16

 .18

 .18

 .20

 .20

 .25

 .16

 .25

 .30

 .30

 .30

 .30

 .25

 .10

INCHES

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .26

PRECIP

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

SEPTEMBER 2018 SHASTA LAKE DAILY OPERATIONS RUN DATE: October 5, 2018

IN LAKE

EVAPORATION

INCHES

C.F.S.

COMPUTED*

1000 ACRE-FEET

RELEASE - C.F.S.

RIVER

TOTALS -286.2 83,481 223,240 0 0 4,578 7.70 .26

ACRE-FEET -286,200 165,585 442,797 0 0 9,080

COMMENTS:

* COMPUTED INFLOW IS THE SUM OF CHANGE IN STORAGE, RELEASES AND EVAPORATION.

SUMMARY

RELEASE (ACRE-FEET)

POWER 442,797

SPILL 0

OUTLET

TOTAL

 0

 442,797

PRECIPITATION

THIS MONTH =

TO DATE =

 .26

JULY 1, 2018 .26

 2,691.4

Table 3

OCT 1, 2017 TO DATE = 38.93
### SUBCHAPTER I—FINDINGS AND PROGRAM AUTHORITY
\

Frank Church-River of No Return Wilderness

Selway-Bitterroot Wilderness

Sawtooth Wilderness

Gospel-Hump Wilderness

Hells Canyon

Boise

Payette

Nez Perce

Salmon-Challis

Sawtooth

Clearwater

Targhee

Idaho Panhandle

Payette

Caribou

Targhee

Bitterroot

Sawtooth

Salmon-Challis

Caribou

Salmon-Challis

Idaho Panhandle

Boise

Salmon-Challis

Nez Perce

Caribou

Idaho Panhandle

Clearwater

Targhee

Caribou

Idaho Panhandle

Sawtooth Caribou

Caribou

§ ̈¦84

§ ̈¦15

§ ̈¦86

§ ̈¦90

§ ̈¦86

§ ̈¦90

£¤20

£¤93

£¤12

£¤95

£¤26

£¤2

1

£¤91

£¤30

£¤91

£¤89

£¤10

£¤61

£¤91

£¤91

1

£¤91

£¤30

£¤89

£¤93

£¤30

£¤26

£¤26

£¤20

£¤93

£¤91

£¤20

£¤95

£¤26 £¤20

£¤30

£¤95

£¤95

£¤95

£¤95

(!51

(!28

(!75

(!21

(!57

(!55

(!37

(!32

(!71

(!33

(!14

(!46

(!22

(!97

(!24

(!78

(!41

(!34

(!5

(!3

(!62

(!47

(!31

(!9

(!11

(!99

(!36

(!1

(!13

(!81

(!8

(!77

(!39

(!6

(!52

(!45

(!27

(!25

(!67

(!23

(!53

(!287

(!48

(!54

(!16

(!200

(!7

(!69

(!89

(!44

(!74

(!60

(!40

(!58

(!50

(!72

(!64

(!43

(!66

(!2

(!78

(!25

(!55

(!97

(!6

(!33

(!36

(!34

(!78

(!55

(!25

(!34

(!8

(!52

(!46

(!55

(!36

(!55

Avery

Driggs

Ashton

Dubois

Burley

Mackay

Emmett

Lowman

McCall

Weiser

Salmon

Kamiah

Leadore

Ketchum

Clayton

Stanley

Challis

Cascade

Council

Kooskia

Orofino

Elk City

Potlatch

Fairfield

Sandpoint

Montpelier

Malad City

Idaho City

North Fork

White Bird

Island Park

New Meadows

Grangeville

Soda Springs

Priest River

Saint Maries

Saint Anthony

Mountain Home

Bonners Ferry

Nampa

Moscow

Rexburg

Caldwell

Lewiston

Pocatello

Twin Falls

Idaho Falls

Coeur d'Alene

Boise

Legend

INTERSTATE

US HIGHWAYS

STATE ROADS

Wilderness

Wild Land Recreation

Primitive

Backcountry - Restoration

General Forest, Rangeland, Grassland

Special Areas

National Forest

Idaho Petition Themes Applied to

Inventoried Roadless Areas

This map is based on information from the State of Idaho contained within the

"Petition of Governor James E. Risch for Roadless Area Management in Idaho,

October 5, 2006."

Idaho Roadless Theme data was obtained from the Idaho Office of Species

Conservation 06/2006, Update 09/2006.

¶

Map prepared by Intermountain Region 04/03/2007

0 12.5 25 50 75 100

Miles
### §1447. Books and materials

The Secretary is authorized to provide for interchanges between the United States and other countries of books and periodicals, including government publications, for the translation of such writings, and for the preparation, distribution, and interchange of other educational materials.

(Jan. 27, 1948, ch. 36, title II, §202, 62 Stat. 7.)
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY HIGH

 81

 82

 83

 80

 81

 76

 94

 83

 82

 82

 77

 77

 78

 72

 76

 73

 87

 86

 84

 82

 84

 90

 77

 81

 120

 140

 138

 121

 113

 121

 108

 77

 77

 77

 76

 75

 75

 75

 74

 74

 73

 72

 70

 70

 70

 71

 72

 72

 76

 75

 74

 74

 74

 71

 71

 79

 103

 107

 100

 102

 105

 104

 79

 78

 79

 78

 78

 75

 81

 77

 76

 75

 74

 72

 72

 71

 73

 72

 78

 79

 77

 76

 76

 77

 73

 76

 87

 110

 114

 108

 108

 110

 105

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

MAY 2010 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: June 16, 2010

HIGH LOW MEAN

 60.9

 61.8

 62.7

 62.8

 62.0

 61.0

 61.4

 62.0

 61.2

 59.1

 58.6

 60.6

 62.3

 62.7

 63.3

 62.8

 61.8

 61.7

 62.2

 62.7

 61.5

 60.2

 61.1

 61.8

 61.4

 65.1

 65.2

 67.0

 69.6

 72.4

 72.9

 57.2

 58.3

 59.0

 59.7

 59.4

 58.0

 58.2

 58.7

 58.9

 57.0

 55.4

 56.9

 58.4

 59.5

 59.9

 60.5

 60.0

 59.0

 59.8

 59.3

 59.7

 57.4

 57.1

 58.3

 59.8

 60.2

 62.0

 61.9

 63.5

 65.8

 68.3

 58.9

 60.0

 60.9

 61.3

 60.8

 59.6

 59.9

 60.5

 59.8

 57.9

 56.9

 58.7

 60.3

 61.2

 61.6

 61.8

 60.6

 60.3

 61.1

 61.1

 60.7

 59.0

 59.0

 60.0

 60.8

 62.3

 63.5

 64.3

 66.1

 68.8

 70.4

HIGH LOW MEAN

 10.1

 9.9

 9.8

 9.9

 9.9

 10.1

 10.1

 10.0

 9.9

 10.1

 10.4

 10.3

 10.1

 9.0

 8.9

 8.8

 8.8

 8.8

 8.9

 8.9

 8.9

 9.2

 9.1

 9.0

 8.5

 7.9

 8.4

 8.6

 8.5

 8.1

 7.9

 9.8

 9.7

 9.7

 9.7

 9.8

 9.9

 9.9

 9.8

 9.8

 9.9

 10.1

 10.0

 8.9

 8.8

 8.7

 8.6

 8.5

 8.6

 8.7

 8.7

 8.7

 8.8

 8.9

 8.5

 7.6

 7.5

 7.4

 8.0

 7.8

 7.5

 7.4

 10.0

 9.8

 9.8

 9.8

 9.9

 10.0

 10.0

 9.9

 9.9

 10.0

 10.3

 10.2

 9.5

 8.9

 8.8

 8.7

 8.7

 8.7

 8.8

 8.8

 8.8

 9.0

 9.0

 8.9

 8.2

 7.7

 7.8

 8.3

 8.2

 7.8

 7.6

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

RIPON ON THE STANISLAUS RIVER

 ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS WATER TEMPERATURE, DEG DISSOLVED OXYZEN, PPM
EXHIBIT 99.1 - ANNUAL FUNDS APPLICATION STATEMENT




                              [LOGO] JPMORGAN


June 30, 2005

     Hartford Life Global Funding Trusts - Annual Funds Application Statement

I, Albert P. Mari, Jr., being a duly appointed officer of JPMorgan Chase Bank,
N.A. ("Indenture Trustee"), do hereby certify on behalf of the Indenture
Trustee, that, with respect to Hartford Life Global Funding Trust 2005-052:





         1. I have reviewed and examined the application by the Indenture
Trustee, during the fiscal year ending June 15, 2005; of trust money collected
by the Indenture Trustee pursuant to Section 5.02 of the Indenture, pursuant to
which the trust's notes (the "Notes") were issued; and

         2. Based upon my review and examination, to the best of my knowledge,
during such fiscal year, the trust money collected by the Indenture Trustee was
properly applied, pursuant to Section 5.02 of the Indenture.

         Nothing herein shall constitute a representation as to the proper
application by the registered holder of the Notes or the trust of the trust
monies received by it.



JPMORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A., as Indenture Trustee
Worldwide Securities Services
4 New York Plaza, 15th Floor
New York, NY 10004


/s/ Albert P. Mari, Jr.


Name:  Albert P. Mari, Jr.
Title: Vice President


<TABLE>
<S><C>
JPMORGAN CHASE BANK o Institutional Trust Services o 4 New York Plaza, Floor 15, New York, NY 10004
</TABLE>
#### § 226.15 Deductions from employee regular annuity rate.

The employee annuity as computed under this subpart may be reduced by premiums required for supplemental medicare coverage, income tax withholding, recovery of debts due the Federal government, garnishment pursuant to part 350 of the chapter and property awards as provided for in part 295 of this chapter.