alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 114th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 4255 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

114th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 4255

To amend the Act commonly known as the Indian Long-Term Leasing Act to 
expand certain exceptions for long-term lease limits for the Pueblo of 
                              Santa Clara.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           December 15, 2015

 Mr. Ben Ray Lujan of New Mexico introduced the following bill; which 
           was referred to the Committee on Natural Resources

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To amend the Act commonly known as the Indian Long-Term Leasing Act to 
expand certain exceptions for long-term lease limits for the Pueblo of 
                              Santa Clara.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. EXPANDING EXCEPTION FOR LONG-TERM LEASES.

    The Act of August 9, 1955 (commonly known as the Indian Long-Term 
Leasing Act; 25 U.S.C. 415(a)), is amended in subsection (a) of the 
first section--
            (1) by striking ``the Puyallup Tribe of Indians,,'' and 
        inserting ``the Puyallup Tribe of Indians, the Pueblo of Santa 
        Clara,'';
            (2) by striking ``leases of the the lands comprising the 
        Moses Allotment Numbered 8'' and inserting ``leases of the 
        lands comprising the Moses Allotment Numbered 8''; and
            (3) by striking ``lands held in trust for the Pueblo of 
        Santa Clara,''.
                                 <all>
```
### §3919. Special consideration of underrepresented and underserved population

In providing financial assistance under this subchapter, the Foundation shall make every effort to ensure that consideration is given to proposals which contain provisions designed to meet the needs of underrepresented and underserved populations.

(Pub. L. 98–377, title I, §109, as added Pub. L. 99–159, title II, §201, Nov. 22, 1985, 99 Stat. 897.)
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
 Washington, D.C. 20549
 SCHEDULE 14A
 Proxy Statement Pursuant to Section 14(a) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934
(Amendment No. )
 þ  o
  o
    
    Preliminary Proxy Statemento
    
    Confidential, for Use of the Commission Only (as permitted by Rule 14a-6(e)(2))o
    
    Definitive Proxy Statemento
    
    Definitive Additional Materialsþ
    
    Soliciting Material Pursuant to §240.14a-12
 Forest Laboratories, Inc.
 
  
   þ
    
    No fee required.o
    
    Fee computed on table below per Exchange Act Rules 14a-6(i)(1) and 0-11.
 (1)
    
    Title of each class of securities to which transaction applies:
 
 (2)
    
    Aggregate number of securities to which transaction applies:
 
 (3)
    
    Per unit price or other underlying value of transaction computed pursuant to Exchange Act Rule
0-11 (set forth the amount on which the filing fee is calculated and state how it was determined):
 
 (4)
    
    Proposed maximum aggregate value of transaction:
 
 (5)
    
    Total fee paid:
 
 o
 o
 (1)
    
    Amount Previously Paid:
 
 (2)
    
    Form, Schedule or Registration Statement No.:
 
 (3)
    
    Filing Party:
 
 (4)
    
    Date Filed:




---



##### 



Sincerely,/s/ Francis I. Perier, Jr.Francis I. Perier, Jr.Executive Vice President  Finance and
 Administration and CFOEnclosure 
 Forward
Looking Information
  Important
Additional Information
 FOREST SHAREHOLDERS ARE STRONGLY ENCOURAGED TO READ THE PROXY STATEMENT AND
ACCOMPANYING PROXY CARD AS THEY BECOME AVAILABLE AS THEY CONTAIN IMPORTANT INFORMATION.
Editorial Note on Part 416
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 416 appear at 68 FR 53509, Sept. 11, 2003.

§ 416.724 Amounts of penalty deductions. ( a ) *Amounts deducted.* If we find that we must impose a penalty deduction, you will lose from your SSI benefits a total amount of— ( 1 ) $25 for a report overdue in the first penalty period;
( 2 ) $50 for a report overdue in the second penalty period; and
( 3 ) $100 for a report overdue in the third (or any following) penalty period.
( b ) *Limit on number of penalties.* Even though more than one required report is overdue from you at the end of a penalty period, we will limit the number of penalty deductions imposed to one penalty deduction for any one penalty period.
IgnitionType Notes

Hot Surface Ignition Hot Surface Ignition

Direct Spark Ignition
#### Melick and Dayton *vs.*Creamer and Emery.

1. A deed absolute on its face, held to be a mortgage, it having been intended by the parties to be a mere security.

2. The general rule disallows costs to the complainant in a suit against a mortgagee to redeem. In this case, the special circumstances held tobe such that neither party should have costs against the other.

*Mr. G. A. Allen,*for complainants.

*Mr. Shipman,*for defendant, Creamer.

The Vice-Ciiaxcelror.

The complainants ask to have a deed of conveyance, absolute on its face, decreed to be a security in the nature of a mortgage, and to be allowed to redeem by payment of the amount due on it. The deed was made November 3d, 1865, by Millis H. Emery 'to Amos M7". Creamer, and was duly acknowledged and recorded on the same day. The estate conveyed, was an undivided vested interest of the grantor in the homestead farm held by his parents for life — a farm of about two hundred and sixty-eight acres, with dwelling-house and out-buildings of good description, and situated near High Bridge, in the county of Hunterdon. The grantor was about twenty-two years old when the deed was given, and gave it for a horse, which was sold him by Creamer for the price of §140. This is the consideration named in the deed. The grantor sold and conveyed the same undivided interest by deed of June 17th, 1868, to the complainants, for the consideration expressed in the deed, of $1800.

Their bill to redeem is upon the ground that the deed of November 3d, 1865, was intended by the parties to it, to be a mere security. They contend, and the defendant, Emery, expressly testifies, that there was no sale and conveyance of the premises in any absolute sense, but only to secure the *430price of the horse, with interest. If this be the truth, the absolute character of the deed on the face of it, will be controlled and changed so as to conform its operation and effect to the real object of it. This is settled by many decisions in this state. *Sweet*v. *Parker, 7 C. E. Green*453. The dispute is about the question of fact. At the close of the testimony, which was given orally before me, the argument of the case was postponed at request of counsel, in accordance with the rule. It has now been waived by the complainants and a written brief has been submitted for the defendant. I regarded the evidence as very strong and conclusive at the close of the testimony, to the point that the deed Was given . as a security. A new and careful examination of it has confirmed this opinion, and I have no hesitation in advising a decree for the complainants.

The general rule disallows costs to the complainant in a. suit against a mortgagee, on a bill to redeem. *Lozear*v. *Shields, 8 C. E. Green*511. I have doubted whether, in this case, the defendant, Creamer, should not be subjected to costs, but the facts on both sides seem to me to be such that neither party should pay costs to the other.

I will advise a decree that the complainants may redeem, by payment of $140, with lawful interest from November 3d, 1865, to the time of the payment, at any time within three months from the date of decree.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY ELEV

 1,013.00

 1,012.16

 1,011.28

 1,010.41

 1,009.56

 1,008.71

 1,007.85

 1,006.98

 1,006.14

 1,005.24

 1,004.40

 1,003.55

 1,002.60

 1,001.72

 1,000.84

 999.89

 998.97

 998.32

 997.46

 996.67

 995.71

 994.82

 993.94

 993.04

 992.12

 991.20

 990.32

 989.57

 988.76

 988.00

 987.22

 3,121.0

 3,101.5

 3,081.2

 3,061.2

 3,041.7

 3,022.3

 3,002.8

 2,983.1

 2,964.2

 2,944.0

 2,925.3

 2,906.4

 2,885.5

 2,866.1

 2,846.8

 2,826.2

 2,806.2

 2,792.1

 2,773.6

 2,756.7

 2,736.2

 2,717.3

 2,698.8

 2,679.8

 2,660.6

 2,641.5

 2,623.2

 2,607.8

 2,591.2

 2,575.6

 2,559.8

STORAGE

-19.6

-19.5

-20.3

-20.0

-19.5

-19.4

-19.5

-19.7

-18.9

-20.2

-18.7

-18.9

-21.0

-19.4

-19.3

-20.7

-20.0

-14.0

-18.5

-16.9

-20.5

-18.9

-18.6

-18.9

-19.2

-19.1

-18.2

-15.5

-16.6

-15.5

-15.8

CHANGE

 3,381

 3,654

 3,455

 3,998

 3,724

 3,468

 3,960

 3,336

 3,930

 3,583

 3,865

 3,375

 3,086

 3,250

 3,599

 3,589

 3,258

 6,096

 3,802

 4,579

 2,906

 3,351

 3,795

 3,416

 3,628

 3,560

 3,623

 3,803

 3,294

 3,703

 3,540

INFLOW

 13,044

 13,212

 13,446

 13,861

 13,261

 12,910

 13,547

 12,955

 13,088

 13,482

 13,031

 12,789

 13,492

 12,761

 13,053

 13,759

 13,072

 13,046

 12,975

 12,919

 13,029

 12,688

 12,994

 12,743

 13,106

 12,935

 12,595

 11,325

 11,473

 11,240

 11,350

POWER

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

SPILL

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

OUTLET

 219

 273

 265

 230

 282

 335

 260

 299

 370

 263

 275

 98

 175

 245

 257

 262

 255

 127

 158

 195

 200

 187

 173

 210

 221

 275

 213

 272

 205

 300

 149

C.F.S.

 .32

 .40

 .39

 .34

 .42

 .50

 .39

 .45

 .56

 .40

 .42

 .15

 .27

 .38

 .40

 .41

 .40

 .20

 .25

 .31

 .32

 .30

 .28

 .34

 .36

 .45

 .35

 .45

 .34

 .50

 .25

INCHES

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .90

 1.78

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

PRECIP

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

JULY 2007 SHASTA LAKE DAILY OPERATIONS RUN DATE: August 7, 2007

IN LAKE

EVAPORATION

INCHES

C.F.S.

COMPUTED*

1000 ACRE-FEET

RELEASE - C.F.S.

RIVER

TOTALS -580.8 113,607 399,181 0 0 7,248 11.30 2.68

ACRE-FEET -580,800 225,339 791,776 0 0 14,376

COMMENTS:

* COMPUTED INFLOW IS THE SUM OF CHANGE IN STORAGE, RELEASES AND EVAPORATION.

SUMMARY

RELEASE (ACRE-FEET)

POWER 791,776

SPILL 0

OUTLET

TOTAL

 0

 791,776

PRECIPITATION

THIS MONTH =

TO DATE =

 2.68

JULY 1, 2007 2.68

 3,140.6
### SUBCHAPTER XXV—UNITED STATES-INDIA FUND FOR CULTURAL, EDUCATIONAL, AND SCIENTIFIC COOPERATION
(No. 73-CC-260

#### Harold L. Huffman, President, Regional Board of School Trustees, Vermilion County, Claimant, *vs.*State of Illinois, Superintendent of Public Instruction, Respondent.

*Opinion filed June 20, 1973.*

Harold L. Huffman, Claimant, pro se.

William J. Scott, Attorney General; William E. Webber, Assistant Attorney General, for Respondent.

Per Curiam.
#### Joseph Gallin, Appellant, v. Lurie Auto Co., Inc., Respondent.

No opinion. Present — Martin, P. J., Townley, Untermyer, Dore and _Callahan, JJ.
```

[Congressional Bills 114th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 4337 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

114th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 4337

  To amend the Small Business Act to require the Administrator of the 
  Small Business Administration to provide information on regulatory 
    changes and regulatory compliance training materials to certain 
                               entities.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            January 6, 2016

  Ms. Meng (for herself and Mr. Hanna) introduced the following bill; 
         which was referred to the Committee on Small Business

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To amend the Small Business Act to require the Administrator of the 
  Small Business Administration to provide information on regulatory 
    changes and regulatory compliance training materials to certain 
                               entities.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Education for Contracting Personnel 
Improvement Act of 2016''.

SEC. 2. REQUIREMENT TO PROVIDE INFORMATION ON REGULATORY CHANGES AND 
              REGULATORY COMPLIANCE TRAINING MATERIALS TO CERTAIN 
              ENTITIES.

    Section 15 of the Small Business Act (15 U.S.C. 644) is amended by 
adding at the end the following new subsection:
    ``(t) Regulatory Changes and Training Materials.--Not less than 
annually, the Administrator shall provide to the Defense Acquisition 
University (established under section 1746 of title 10, United States 
Code), the Federal Acquisition Institute (established under section 
1201 of title 41, United States Code), the individual responsible for 
mandatory training and education of the acquisition workforce of each 
agency (described under section 1703(f)(1)(C) of title 41, United 
States Code), small business development centers (as defined in section 
21), and entities participating in the Procurement Technical Assistance 
Cooperative Agreement Program under chapter 142 of title 10, United 
States Code--
            ``(1) a list of all changes made in the prior year to 
        regulations promulgated--
                    ``(A) by the Administrator that affect Federal 
                acquisition; and
                    ``(B) by the Federal Acquisition Council that 
                implement changes to this Act; and
            ``(2) any materials the Administrator has developed to 
        explain, train, or assist Federal agencies or departments or 
        small business concerns to comply with the regulations 
        specified in paragraph (1).''.
                                 <all>
```
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY HIGH

 777

 735

 642

 635

 610

 531

 523

 477

 441

 480

 560

 528

 630

 695

 700

 711

 769

 728

 696

 718

 615

 576

 542

 585

 587

 606

 597

 684

 725

 824

 821

 141

 138

 143

 144

 148

 153

 141

 150

 149

 150

 161

 171

 154

 155

 158

 166

 175

 173

 178

 196

 170

 186

 196

 181

 181

 178

 163

 172

 175

 171

 177

 354

 339

 316

 299

 295

 276

 265

 265

 267

 298

 310

 286

 299

 329

 341

 358

 389

 387

 391

 387

 328

 353

 342

 305

 300

 312

 306

 338

 370

 404

 395

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

AUGUST 2009 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: September 2, 2009

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

SAN ANDREAS ON THE SAN JOAQUIN RIVER
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the
Consolidated Balance Sheet as of September 30, 1996 and the Consolidated
Statement of Operations for the nine months ended September 30, 1996 and is
qualified in its entirety by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1996
<CASH>                                           4,290
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  342,118
<ALLOWANCES>                                     2,332
<INVENTORY>                                    253,944
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               602,199
<PP&E>                                          67,621
<DEPRECIATION>                                  15,053
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 673,643
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          272,125
<BONDS>                                        234,408
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                     15,000
<COMMON>                                           448
<OTHER-SE>                                     146,385
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   673,643
<SALES>                                      1,295,750
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             1,420,570
<CGS>                                        1,164,420
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                1,248,722
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              10,368
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 38,401
<INCOME-TAX>                                    15,360
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             38,401
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    23,041
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.47
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.46
        

</TABLE>
EXHIBIT 3.105
 State of Delaware
 Office of the Secretary of State
 
   /s/ Edward J. FreelEdward J. Freel, Secretary of State 2989347 8100
    
    AUTHENTICATION: 9507782991005185
    
    Date: 01-07-99




---



##### 



CERTIFICATE OF FORMATION
OF
WILLAMETTE VALLEY CLINICS, LLC
 Delaware Limited Liability Company Act
     By:
    /s/ John M. Franck IIName:  John M. Franck IITitle:  



Authorized Person




---



##### 



By:
    /s/ Denise W. WarrenName:
    Denise W. WarrenAuthorized Person STATE OF DELAWARE
SECRETARY OF STATE
DIVISION OF CORPORATIONS
DELIVERED 04:18 PM 03/03/2008
FILED 03:26 PM 03/03/2008
SRV 080275883  2989347 FILE
#### Eric Awa AKENJI, Petitioner, v. Alberto R. GONZALES, Attorney General of the United States, Respondent.

No. 05-1918.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: June 21, 2006.

Decided: July 24, 2006.

Patrick G. Tzeuton, Silver Spring, Maryland, for Petitioner. Rod J. Rosenstein, United States Attorney, Tonya K. Kowitz, Assistant United States Attorney, Baltimore, Maryland, for Respondent.

Before MICHAEL, SHEDD, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.

Petition denied by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).

PER CURIAM:

Eric Awa Akenji, a native and citizen of Cameroon, petitions for review of an order of the Board of Immigration Appeals (“Board”) affirming without opinion the immigration judge’s order denying his application for asylum, withholding of removal, and protection under the Convention Against Torture.

To obtain reversal of a determination denying eligibility for relief, an alien “must show that the evidence he presented was so compelling that no reasonable factfinder could fail to find the requisite fear of persecution.” *INS v. Elias-Zacarias,*502 U.S. 478, 483-84, 112 S.Ct. 812, 117 L.Ed.2d 38 (1992). We have reviewed the evidence of record and conclude that Akenji fails to show that the evidence compels a contrary result. Accordingly, we cannot grant the relief that he seeks.

Additionally, we uphold the immigration judge’s denial of Akenji’s request for withholding of removal. “Because the burden of proof for withholding of removal is higher than for asylum — even though the facts that must be proved are the same' — an applicant who is ineligible for asylum is necessarily ineligible for withholding of removal under [8 U.S.C.] § 1231(b)(3).” *Camara v. Ashcroft,*378 F.3d 361, 367 (4th Cir.2004). Because Akenji fails to show that he is eligible for asylum, he cannot meet the higher standard for withholding of removal.

We also find that Akenji fails to meet the standard for relief under the Convention Against Torture. To obtain such relief, an applicant must establish that “it is more likely than not that he or she would *243be tortured if removed to the proposed country of removal.” 8 C.F.R. § 1208.16(c)(2) (2004). We find that Akenji fails to make the requisite showing.

Accordingly, we deny the petition for review. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*PETITION DENIED.*
EXHIBIT 32.1



           CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER
                PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

                      AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
          SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



     In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10Q of First
Keystone Corporation (the "Corporation") for the period ended June
30, 2010, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the
"Report"), I, J. Gerald Bazewicz, President and CEO, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as added by Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:

     1.   The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
          13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     2.   The information contained in the Report fairly presents,
          in all material respects, the financial condition and
          results of operations of the Corporation as of and for the
          period covered by the Report.






                                /s/ J. Gerald Bazewicz

                                J. Gerald Bazewicz
                                President and CEO


August 5, 2010
**Exhibit 23.1**

**Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm**

The Board of Directors 

Ruth’s Chris Steak House, Inc.: 

We consent to theincorporation by reference in the registration statement (No. 333-127681) on Form S-8 of Ruth’s Chris Steak House, Inc. of our reports dated March 11, 2008, with respect to the consolidated balance sheets of Ruth’s Chris Steak House,Inc. and subsidiaries as of December 31, 2006 and December 30, 2007, and the related consolidated statements of income, stockholders’ equity (deficit) and cash flows for the fifty-two weeks ended December 25, 2005, fifty-threeweeks ended December 31, 2006, and fifty-two weeks ended December 30, 2007, and the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting as of December 30, 2007, which reports appear in the December 30, 2007, annual reporton Form 10-K of Ruth’s Chris Steak House, Inc. 

Our report on the consolidated financial statements dated March 11, 2008,contains an explanatory paragraph that states that the Company adopted the provisions of Statement of Financial Accounting Standard No. 123(R), *Share-Based Payment*, in fiscal year 2006, and Financial Accounting Standards BoardInterpretation No. 48, *Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes*, in fiscal year 2007. 

/s/ KPMG LLP 

Orlando, Florida 

March 11, 2008 

Certified Public Accountants