alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 32.1

Certification of CEO and CFO Pursuant to

18 U.S.C. Section 1350,

as Adopted Pursuant to

Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of BlackRock Kelso Capital
Corporation (the Company) for the annual period ended December 31, 2006 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), James R. Maher, as Chief Executive Officer of the Company, and
Frank D. Gordon, as Chief Financial Officer of the Company, each hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                                                                         
|-------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                         
|/s/ James R. Maher                                                       
|Name: James R. Maher Title: Chief Executive
Officer Date: March 28, 2007 
|                                                                         
|/s/ Frank D. Gordon                                                      
|Name: Frank D. Gordon Title: Chief Financial
Officer Date: March 28, 2007
# Fourth Court of Appeals
San Antonio, Texas

October 29, 2018

No. 04

- 18

- 00411

- CV

REPSOL OIL AND GAS USA, LLC as successor of Talisman Energy USA Inc, Statoil Texas

Onshore Properties, LLC, and Statoil Pipelines, LLC, and OGE, LLC

, Appellants

v.

MATRIX PETROLEUM, LLC , Matrix Petroleum Holdings LLC, JAR Resources Holdings, L.P., and TMRX Petroleum, LLC,

Appellees

From the 218th Judicial District Court, La Salle County, Texas

Trial Court No. 14

- 08

- 00158

- CVL Honorable Russell Wilson, Judge Presiding



### O R D E R

The court reporter’s second request for additional time to file the reporter’s record is granted. We order the court reporter, Leticia Escamilla, to file the reporter’s record by November 26, 2018. Ms. Escamilla is advised that no further extensions of time will be granted abs ent a timely motion that (1) demonstrates extraordinary circumstances justifying further delay, (2) advises the court of the efforts expended in preparing the reporter’s record, and (3) provides the court reasonable assurance that the reporter’s record wil l be completed and filed by the requested extended deadline. The court does not generally consider a heavy work schedule to be an extraordinary circumstance

.

_________ ________________________ Luz Elena D. Chapa, Justice

I N WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said
court on this 29th day of October, 2018

.

___ ________________________________ KEITH E. HOTTLE

, Clerk of Court
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR
. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR
. R. 47.5.4. 

### IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 07-40858 Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA Plaintiff-Appellee
v. JORGE LOPEZ-MARTINEZ Defendant-Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. 5:07-CR-587-1 Before KING, STEWART, and PRADO, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: * Appealing the Judgment in a Criminal Case, Jorge Lopez-Martinez raises arguments that are foreclosed by Al mendarez-Torres v. United States, 523 U.S. 224, 235 (1998), whic h held that 8 U.S.C. § 1326(b)(2) is a penalty provision and not a separate criminal offense. United States v. PinedaArrellano, 492 F.3d 624, 625 (5th Cir. 2007), cert. denied, 128 S. Ct. 872 (2008). United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit 

### F I L E D March 5, 2008 Charles R. Fulbruge III ClerkNo. 07-40858

2 Theappellant’s motion for summary disposition isGRA NTED, and the judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.
### §§2593c, 2593d. Repealed. Pub. L. 105–277, div. G, subdiv. A, title XII, §1222, Oct. 21, 1998, 112 Stat. 2681–768

Section 2953c, Pub. L. 87–297, title IV, §53, as added Pub. L. 103–236, title VII, §718(a), Apr. 30, 1994, 108 Stat. 500, related to requirement for authorization of appropriations.

Section 2593d, Pub. L. 87–297, title IV, §54, as added Pub. L. 103–236, title VII, §718(a), Apr. 30, 1994, 108 Stat. 500, related to transfers and reprogrammings of funds.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date of Repeal

Repeal effective Apr. 1, 1999, see section 1201 of Pub. L. 105–277, set out as an Effective Date note under section 6511 of this title.
# C o u rt o f

A p p ea ls

o f t h e S t a te o f

G eo rg ia

ATLANTA,_

_ _ __ _ _ __ _ __ _ _ _ _ _ __ _

Th e Co u rt

o f Ap p ea l s h er eb y p a s s es t h e f

o ll owi n g o r der :

A1 7 A2 11 8 . RI CHARD BI SHOP v . THE STATE.

A j u ry fo u n d Ri ch ard Bi s h o p g u i l t y of o p erat i n g a ch op s h o p, t h eft b y recei v i n g

s t o l en p ro p ert y , an d p o s s es s i o n o f t o ol s fo r th e co m m i ss i o n o f a cri m e, an d h i s

co n vi ct i o n s were affi rm ed o n ap p eal in an u n p u bl i sh ed o pi n io n

. See B i s ho p v. S t a t e , Cas e No

. A1 6 A 1 4 8 6 (d eci ded Feb ru ary 1 4

, 2 0 1 7 ). Bi s ho p s u bs eq u en t l y fi l ed an

ex t rao rd i n ary m ot i o n fo r n ew t ri al

, wh i ch t h e t ri a l c o u rt den i ed

. Bi s h o p t h en fi l ed

t h i s d i rect ap peal

. An o rd er d en y i n g an ex t rao rd i n ary m o ti o n fo r a n ew t ri al m u s t b e ap p eal ed by

ap p li cat io n fo r d i s cret i o n ary ap p eal

. See OCGA § 5

- 6 -3 5 (a) (7 ); Ba l kco m v. S t a t e , 2 2 7 Ga. Ap p

. 3 2 7, 3 2 9 (4 8 9 SE2 d 1 2 9 ) (1 9 9 7 ). Acco rd i n g l y , we l ack j u ri s d i ct i o n

o v er t h i s d i rect ap p eal , wh i ch i s h ereb y DISM ISSED.

C o u r t o f A p p e a l s o f t h e S t a t e o

f G e o r g ia

C le r k ’ s O f f i c e

, A t la n t a

,

_

_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ I c e r ti fy t h a t t h e a b o v e is a tr u e e x t r a c t f r o m

t h e m i n u t e s o

f t h e C o u r t o

f A p p e a l s o f G e o r g i a

. W i tn e s s m y s i g n a t u r e a n d t h e s e a l o

f s a i d c o u r t

h e r e t o a f f i x e d t h e d a y a n d y e a r l a s t a b o v e w r i t t e n

.

, C l e r k

. August 10, 2017

08/10/2017
Exhibit
32.2




CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




In connection with the Annual Report of
SRKP 3, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31,
2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof
(the "Report"), I, Anthony C. Pintsopoulos, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss.
1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to
my knowledge:





(1) The
Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2) The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





/s/
      Anthony C. PintsopoulosAnthony
      C. Pintsopoulos
                Principal
      Financial Officer
                February
      22, 2011
§ 614.5 Claims for UCX. ( a ) *First claims.* A first claim for UCX shall be filed by an individual in any State agency of any State according to the applicable State law, and on a form prescribed by the Department which shall be furnished to the individual by the State agency where the claim is filed.
( b ) *Weekly claims.* Claims for waiting week credit and payments of UCX for weeks of unemployment shall be filed in any State agency (or Canada) at the times and in the manner as claims for State unemployment compensation are filed under the applicable State law, and on forms prescribed by the Department which shall be furnished to the individual by the State agency where the claim is filed.
( c ) *Secretary's standard.* The procedures for reporting and filing claims for UCX and waiting period credit shall be consistent with this part 614 and the Secretary's “Standard for Claim Filing, Claimant Reporting, Job Finding and Employment Services” in the *Employment Security Manual,* part V, sections 5000-5004 (appendix A of this part).
[47 FR 54697, Dec. 3, 1982, as amended at 53 FR 40554, Oct. 17, 1988]
#### § 355.15 Ex parte contacts.

No party or person (except employees of the ALJ's office) shall communicate in any way with the ALJ on any matter at issue in a case, unless on notice and opportunity for all parties to participate. This provision does not prohibit a person or party from inquiring about the status of a case or asking routine questions concerning administrative functions or procedures.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<MULTIPLIER>                  1
       

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                 3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                             DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                                JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                                  MAR-31-1998
<CASH>                                                815,506
<SECURITIES>                                                0
<RECEIVABLES>                                         911,122
<ALLOWANCES>                                          873,065
<INVENTORY>                                                 0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                    2,629,144
<PP&E>                                             12,395,029
<DEPRECIATION>                                      5,653,338
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                      9,569,779
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                 589,590
<BONDS>                                             4,951,414
<COMMON>                                                    0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                       0
<PREFERRED>                                                 0
<OTHER-SE>                                                  0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                        9,569,779
<SALES>                                                     0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                      716,009
<CGS>                                                       0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                         611,898
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                            0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                            0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                    131,282
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                       104,111
<INCOME-TAX>                                                0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                         0
<DISCONTINUED>                                              0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                             0
<CHANGES>                                                   0
<NET-INCOME>                                          104,111
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                               6.49
<EPS-DILUTED>                                               0

        


</TABLE>
§ 438.205 Professional and technical services. ( a ) The prohibition on the use of appropriated funds, in § 438.100(a), does not apply in the case of a payment of reasonable compensation made to an officer or employee of a person requesting or receiving a Federal contract, grant, loan, or cooperative agreement or an extension, continuation, renewal, amendment, or modification of a Federal contract, grant, loan, or cooperative agreement if payment is for professional or technical services rendered directly in the preparation, submission, or negotiation of any bid, proposal, or application for that Federal contract, grant, loan, or cooperative agreement or for meeting requirements imposed by or pursuant to law as a condition for receiving that Federal contract, grant, loan, or cooperative agreement.
( b ) For purposes of paragraph (a) of this section, *professional and technical services* are limited to advice and analysis directly applying any professional or technical discipline. For example, drafting of a legal document accompanying a bid or proposal by a lawyer is allowable. Similarly, technical advice provided by an engineer on the performance or operational capability of a piece of equipment rendered directly in the negotiation of a contract is allowable. However, communications with the intent to influence made by a professional (such as a licensed lawyer) or a technical person (such as a licensed accountant) are not allowable under this section unless they provide advice and analysis directly applying their professional or technical expertise and unless the advice or analysis is rendered directly and solely in the preparation, submission or negotiation of a covered Federal action. Thus, for example, communications with the intent to influence made by a lawyer that do not provide legal advice or analysis directly and solely related to the legal aspects of his or her client's proposal, but generally advocate one proposal over another are not allowable under this section because the lawyer is not providing professional legal services. Similarly, communications with the intent to influence made by an engineer providing an engineering analysis prior to the preparation or submission of a bid or proposal are not allowable under this section since the engineer is providing technical services but not directly in the preparation, submission or negotiation of a covered Federal action.
( c ) Requirements imposed by or pursuant to law as a condition for receiving a covered Federal award include those required by law or regulation, or reasonably expected to be required by law or regulation, and any other requirements in the actual award documents.
( d ) Only those services expressly authorized by this section are allowable under this section.
### **CHAPTER 69—CUBAN DEMOCRACY**

Sec.
6001.
Findings.
6002.
Statement of policy.
6003.
International cooperation.
6004.
Support for Cuban people.
6005.
Sanctions.
6006.
Policy toward a transitional Cuban Government.
6007.
Policy toward a democratic Cuban Government.
6008.
Existing claims not affected.
6009.
Enforcement.
6010.
"United States person" defined.
#### § 408.1020 How do we make our reconsidered determination?

After you request a reconsideration, we will review the evidence considered in making the initial determination and any other evidence we receive. We will make our determination based on the preponderance of the evidence in the record. The person who makes the reconsidered determination will have had no prior involvement with the initial determination.

[69 FR 25955, May 10, 2004, as amended at 73 FR 76944, Dec. 18, 2008]
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY HIGH

 525

 422

 386

 391

 413

 416

 473

 507

 574

 620

 680

 592

 491

 482

 493

 455

 394

 398

 388

 380

 397

 385

 446

 424

 433

 468

 457

 452

 416

 408

 399

 209

 179

 168

 192

 205

 205

 195

 187

 167

 150

 175

 178

 191

 190

 240

 161

 166

 161

 158

 178

 148

 138

 156

 183

 186

 207

 181

 196

 202

 216

 205

 368

 333

 293

 303

 303

 302

 307

 318

 328

 340

 347

 347

 341

 339

 349

 326

 307

 293

 271

 293

 292

 277

 301

 304

 304

 318

 312

 313

 298

 303

 298

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

JULY 2014 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: August 8, 2014

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

SAN ANDREAS ON THE SAN JOAQUIN RIVER
# Fourth Court of Appeals San Antonio, Texas September 2, 2021 No. 04-21-00240-CV INTEREST OF C.H., J.H., E.H., I.B.H., AND I.A.H. From the 112th Judicial District Court, Sutton County, Texas

Trial Court No. CV06287 Honorable Pedro (Pete) Gomez Jr., Judge Presiding



### O R D E R The Appellant, S.H.'s Motion for Extension of Time to File Brief is hereby GRANTED. The appellant, S.H.'s brief is due on or before September 3, 2021.

_________________________________ Liza A. Rodriguez, Justice IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said court on this 2nd day of September, 2021.

___________________________________ MICHAEL A. CRUZ, Clerk of Court
### §2347g. Records regarding foreign participants

#### (a) Development and maintenance of database

In order to contribute most effectively to the development of military professionalism in foreign countries, the Secretary of Defense shall develop and maintain a database containing records on each foreign military or defense ministry civilian participant in education and training activities conducted under this part after December 31, 2000. This record shall include the type of instruction received, the dates of such instruction, whether such instruction was completed successfully, and, to the extent practicable, a record of the person's subsequent military or defense ministry career and current position and location.

#### (b) Annual list of foreign personnel

For the purposes of preparing the report required pursuant to section 2347h of this title, the Secretary of State may annually request the Secretary of Defense to provide information contained in the database, with respect to a list submitted to the Secretary of Defense by the Secretary of State, that contains the names of foreign personnel or military units. To the extent practicable, the Secretary of Defense shall provide, and the Secretary of State may take into account, the information contained in the database, if any, relating to the Secretary of State's submission.

#### (c) Updating of database

If the Secretary of State determines and reports to Congress under section 2347h of this title that a foreign person identified in the database maintained pursuant to this section was involved in a violation of internationally recognized human rights, the Secretary of Defense shall ensure that the database is updated to contain such fact and all relevant information.

(Pub. L. 87–195, pt. II, §548, as added Pub. L. 106–280, title II, §202, Oct. 6, 2000, 114 Stat. 851; amended Pub. L. 107–228, div. B, title XII, §1212(b), Sept. 30, 2002, 116 Stat. 1429.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

2002—Pub. L. 107–228 designated existing provisions as subsec. (a), inserted heading, and added subsecs. (b) and (c).
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY HIGH

 15,385

 14,509

 15,139

 15,937

 18,418

 19,087

 19,816

 16,948

 17,231

 17,634

 16,476

 16,619

 16,417

 15,669

 14,266

 14,188

 15,580

 16,562

 16,585

 18,787

 17,746

 17,009

 16,638

 15,557

 14,756

 13,354

 12,098

 11,276

 9,954

 10,362

 9,730

 7,247

 6,867

 7,121

 7,679

 7,999

 9,076

 8,628

 6,587

 6,192

 6,286

 6,284

 6,052

 6,056

 6,171

 6,131

 5,930

 7,324

 7,553

 8,215

 7,865

 6,158

 5,828

 5,423

 4,982

 4,473

 4,265

 3,832

 3,905

 3,494

 3,348

 3,224

 11,359

 10,562

 10,878

 11,249

 12,383

 13,428

 14,028

 11,782

 11,222

 12,025

 11,188

 11,023

 11,245

 11,388

 10,634

 10,941

 11,503

 11,923

 11,850

 12,499

 11,200

 10,547

 9,837

 9,088

 8,480

 7,991

 7,191

 7,294

 6,899

 6,396

 5,843

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

DECEMBER 2007 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: January 10, 2008

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

PITTSBURG BOTTOM ON THE SACRAMENTO RIVER
Exhibit 31.4

CERTIFICATIONS PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Peter Anevski, certify that:

1. I have
reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of WebMD Health Corp.; and

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report.

3. [Intentionally omitted]*

4. [Intentionally omitted]*

5. [Intentionally omitted]*

Date:
April 29, 2014



/s/ Peter AnevskiPeter AnevskiChief Financial Officer(Principal financial and accounting officer)




|* | Paragraphs 3 through 5, omitted here, are included in Exhibit 31.2 to the Annual Report on Form 10-K filed by WebMD Health Corp. on March 3, 2014.
|- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY ELEV

 1,033.53

 1,032.89

 1,032.23

 1,031.58

 1,030.91

 1,030.31

 1,029.69

 1,029.09

 1,028.54

 1,028.07

 1,027.65

 1,027.27

 1,026.82

 1,026.33

 1,025.91

 1,025.51

 1,025.03

 1,024.59

 1,024.10

 1,023.72

 1,023.34

 1,022.99

 1,022.58

 1,022.20

 1,021.79

 1,021.43

 1,020.98

 1,020.57

 1,020.25

 1,019.81

 1,019.37

 3,623.5

 3,607.1

 3,590.2

 3,573.6

 3,556.5

 3,541.3

 3,525.7

 3,510.5

 3,496.7

 3,484.9

 3,474.4

 3,465.0

 3,453.7

 3,441.6

 3,431.1

 3,421.3

 3,409.4

 3,398.6

 3,386.5

 3,377.2

 3,367.9

 3,359.4

 3,349.4

 3,340.1

 3,330.2

 3,321.4

 3,310.5

 3,300.7

 3,293.0

 3,282.4

 3,271.8

STORAGE

-15.7

-16.4

-16.9

-16.6

-17.1

-15.2

-15.7

-15.1

-13.8

-11.8

-10.5

-9.5

-11.2

-12.2

-10.4

-9.9

-11.9

-10.8

-12.1

-9.3

-9.3

-8.6

-10.0

-9.3

-10.0

-8.7

-10.9

-9.9

-7.7

-10.6

-10.6

CHANGE

 3,960

 3,507

 3,920

 3,950

 3,842

 3,665

 3,549

 3,869

 4,066

 3,898

 3,588

 3,942

 3,276

 3,102

 3,713

 4,176

 3,695

 3,525

 3,274

 3,635

 3,381

 4,269

 3,406

 3,394

 3,487

 3,526

 2,727

 3,422

 3,771

 3,118

 3,256

INFLOW

 11,546

 11,505

 12,188

 12,054

 12,169

 11,062

 11,160

 11,244

 10,793

 9,593

 8,621

 8,467

 8,708

 9,011

 8,675

 8,884

 9,400

 8,692

 9,104

 8,091

 7,866

 8,377

 8,237

 7,872

 8,227

 7,680

 7,972

 8,211

 7,446

 8,192

 8,277

POWER

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

SPILL

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

OUTLET

 333

 294

 248

 255

 269

 268

 290

 252

 236

 251

 257

 257

 220

 227

 292

 277

 276

 290

 246

 238

 202

 209

 201

 186

 279

 243

 249

 192

 213

 269

 318

C.F.S.

 .44

 .39

 .33

 .34

 .36

 .36

 .39

 .34

 .32

 .34

 .35

 .35

 .30

 .31

 .40

 .38

 .38

 .40

 .34

 .33

 .28

 .29

 .28

 .26

 .39

 .34

 .35

 .27

 .30

 .38

 .45

INCHES

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

PRECIP

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

AUGUST 2005 SHASTA LAKE DAILY OPERATIONS RUN DATE: March 7, 2006

IN LAKE

EVAPORATION

INCHES

C.F.S.

COMPUTED*

1000 ACRE-FEET

RELEASE - C.F.S.

RIVER

TOTALS -367.7 111,909 289,324 0 0 7,837 10.74 .00

ACRE-FEET -367,700 221,972 573,874 0 0 15,545

COMMENTS:

* COMPUTED INFLOW IS THE SUM OF CHANGE IN STORAGE, RELEASES AND EVAPORATION.

SUMMARY

RELEASE (ACRE-FEET)

POWER 573,874

SPILL 0

OUTLET

TOTAL

 0

 573,874

PRECIPITATION

THIS MONTH =

TO DATE =

 .00

JULY 1, 2005 .00

 3,639.2

Table 3