alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
* Pursuant to Local Rule 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent

except under the limited circumstances set forth in Local Rule

47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 96-30805

Summary Calendar

 

GERARDO A. URREGO,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus

JANET RENO; DORIS MEISSNER,

Defendants-Appellees.

- - - - - - - - - -

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Western District of Louisiana

USDC No. 96-CV-1328

- - - - - - - - - -

December 11, 1996

Before SMITH, DUHÉ, and BARKSDALE, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Gerardo A. Urrego, prisoner #61191-079, appeals the district

court’s denial of his petition for a writ of mandamus, pursuant

to 28 U.S.C. § 1361. Urrego contends that 8 U.S.C. § 1252(h)(1)

requires the Attorney General to deport him prior to the

execution of his 292-month sentence.

As the district court determined, the statute authorizes the

Attorney General to act. Urrego has failed to demonstrate that
No. 96-30805

- 2 -

the Attorney General has a clear duty to act and thus he is not

entitled to mandamus relief. Smith v. North La. Medical Review

Ass'n, 735 F.2d 168, 172 (5th Cir. 1984). Urrego has abandoned

his claim under the Administrative Procedures Act by failing to

assert it on appeal. See Brinkmann v. Dallas County Deputy

Sheriff Abner, 813 F.2d 744, 748 (5th Cir. 1987). Accordingly,

Urrego’s appeal is dismissed as frivolous. See 5th Cir. R. 42.2.

APPEAL DISMISSED.
Pursuant to 5 T H C IR . R. 47.5 , the court has determined that this opinionshould not * be publishe d an d is not precedent except under the limited circu mstance s set forth in 5 T H C IR . R. 47.5 .4. 

### INTHE UNI TED S TATESCOU RT OFAPPEALS

FORTHE FIFTH CIRCU IT

N o. 09- 50722 Su m m ar yC al endar
UN I TE D S TA TE S OF AM ERI CA, P l ai n t i f f

- A pp el l ee
v. FR AN CI SCO CO RT EZ- G O M EZ , D e fe nda nt
- Appe l l ant

A pp ealf

rom t h e U n i t ed S t ates D i st ri ctC ou rt f or t h e W est ern D i st ri ctof T exas U SD C N o. 2: 08- C R

- 1192- 1
B ef ore D AV IS, SM ITH an d D E N N IS, C i rcui tJu dg es. P E R C U R I A M: * F ran ci sco C ort ez- G om ez ( C ort ez) app eal s t h e n o n gu i del i n es s en t en ce i m po s e d f

o l l o w i ng hi s gui l t y pl e a c o nvi c t i o n f o ri l l e ga lr e e nt r y af

t e rde po r t at i o n. He a r g u e s t h a t t h e 2 1
- m o n t h s e n t e n c e i m p o s e di s u n r e a s o n a b l e u n d e r1 8 U. S
. C. § 3 55 3( a) b e c aus e t he s e nt e nc e i s g r e at e rt han ne c e s s ar y t o a ddr e s s t he s e nt e nc i ng fac t o r s s e tf o r t h t he r e i n. T h e d i st ri ctcou rtd et erm i n ed t h at the ad vi sory gu i del i n es ran ge w as not ad equ ate and t h at a great er se n te n ce w as w arran t ed ba sed on C ort ez’ s pri or United States Court of App eals

Fifth Circuit 

### F I L E D April19, 2010 Lyle W . Cayce Clerk Case: 09-50722 Document: 00511084794 Page: 1 Date Filed: 04/19/2010N o. 09- 50722

2 cri m i n alhi st ory, character i st i cs, t h e need t o prot ectthe p u bl i c, an d to deter fu t u r e c r im in a l b e h a v io r . C o r t e z h a s n o ts h o w n th a tth e d is t r ic tc o u r t ’s de t e r m i nat i o n w as an ab us e o f di s c r e t i o n. S ee G allv. Un i t ed S t ate s , 552 U
. S. 38, 5 1 (2 0 0 7 ); Un ite dS ta te s v . S m ith , 4 4 0 F .3d 7 0 4 , 7 0 9 -1 0 (5t h C ir. 2 0 0 6 ). Ac c o r d i n g l y , t h e j u d g me n to f t h e d i s t r i c tc o u r ti s A F F I RMED. Case: 09-50722 Document: 00511084794 Page: 2 Date Filed: 04/19/2010
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

DAY HIGH

 64

 65

 66

 65

 64

 64

 64

 65

 66

 70

 76

 81

 75

 78

 75

 70

 70

 149

 150

 162

 154

 158

 174

 180

 166

 164

 167

 169

 168

 172

 41

 58

 59

 41

 56

 45

 41

 39

 48

 53

 43

 47

 47

 49

 51

 46

 52

 63

 138

 139

 142

 143

 144

 145

 152

 158

 161

 164

 165

 167

 58

 62

 63

 59

 61

 59

 59

 61

 62

 61

 64

 65

 65

 66

 66

 65

 66

 96

 143

 145

 146

 147

 152

 156

 157

 160

 163

 165

 167

 170

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

NOVEMBER 2011 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: February 2, 2012

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

SAN ANDREAS ON THE SAN JOAQUIN RIVER
### §3752. Transactions with Republic of Panama

#### (a) Commission assistance on reimbursable basis

The Commission may, on a reimbursable basis, provide to the Republic of Panama materials, supplies, equipment, work, or services, including water and electric power, requested by the Republic of Panama, at such rates as may be agreed upon by the Commission and the Republic of Panama. Payment for such materials, supplies, equipment, work, or services may be made by direct payment by the Republic of Panama to the Commission or by offset against amounts due the Republic of Panama by the United States.

#### (b) Commission assistance on nonreimbursable basis

The Commission may provide office space, equipment, supplies, personnel, and other in-kind services to the Panama Canal Authority on a nonreimbursable basis.

#### (c) Other department of agency assistance on reimbursable basis

Any executive department or agency of the United States may, on a reimbursable basis, provide to the Panama Canal Authority materials, supplies, equipment, work, or services requested by the Panama Canal Authority, at such rates as may be agreed upon by that department or agency and the Panama Canal Authority.

(Pub. L. 96–70, title I, §1342, Sept. 27, 1979, 93 Stat. 483; Pub. L. 105–85, div. C, title XXXV, §3542, Nov. 18, 1997, 111 Stat. 2072.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

1997—Pub. L. 105–85 designated existing provisions as subsec. (a) and added subsecs. (b) and (c).
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

DAY

 14,375

 13,140

 6,767

 7,172

 4,944

 5,548

 5,781

 5,893

 5,062

 4,681

 4,151

 4,324

 4,394

 3,626

 3,866

 3,478

 3,303

 3,462

 8,741

 11,512

 9,087

 8,004

 8,404

 9,149

 8,592

 9,899

 8,771

 8,040

 5,716

 6,690

 116,970

 124,778

 131,022

 130,900

 131,168

 129,306

 128,112

 127,198

 126,437

 124,924

 123,124

 120,912

 118,974

 117,199

 114,784

 112,718

 110,386

 108,004

 105,893

 108,902

 114,394

 117,307

 119,045

 121,077

 123,714

 125,691

 128,811

 130,702

 131,805

 130,645

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

NOVEMBER 2016 SHASTA LAKE FLOOD CONTROL REQUIREMENTS RUN DATE: December 28, 2016

 131,345

 137,918

 137,789

 138,072

 136,112

 134,854

 133,893

 133,091

 131,499

 129,605

 127,275

 125,236

 123,368

 120,825

 118,650

 116,196

 113,689

 111,466

 114,634

 120,414

 123,481

 125,311

 127,449

 130,226

 132,306

 135,590

 137,582

 138,742

 137,521

 137,335

 3,870,000

 3,849,000

 3,827,000

 3,806,000

 3,785,000

 3,763,000

 3,742,000

 3,721,000

 3,700,000

 3,678,000

 3,657,000

 3,636,000

 3,614,000

 3,593,000

 3,572,000

 3,550,000

 3,529,000

 3,508,000

 3,486,000

 3,465,000

 3,444,000

 3,422,000

 3,401,000

 3,380,000

 3,359,000

 3,337,000

 3,316,000

 3,295,000

 3,273,000

 3,252,000

 SHASTA 

INFLOW 

C. F. S. 

 PREV DAY

 F. C. PAR 

 (COL 3) 

 X .95 

 F. C. 

 PARAM 

 (COLS. 

 1 + 2 ) 

 .0356* 

 X DAYS 

 12/23 THRU

3/20 

 530,000

 MINUS 

 F. C. 

 PARAM

 (COL 3)

 COLS 

 4 X 5 

 F. C. 

 RESERV 

 (1,300,000 

 - COL 6 ) 

 MINUS 

 14,943 

 PER DAY

 AFTER 

 3/20 

 ADJUSTED 

 F. C. 

 RESERV 

 (7-8) 

 PERM 

 STORAGE 

 COMMENTS:

 * LEAP YEAR CONSTANT = .0352 

 CONSTANT .0356 = 1,300,000 / (TOTAL DAYS X (530,000 - 110,000 ) )

 IF COL 3 IS GREATER THAN 530,000 OR LESS THAN 110,000 USE THOSE VALUES FOR COL 3 INSTEAD OF THE COMPUTED VALUE. 

 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 

 123,127
### SUBCHAPTER XX—WORLD HEALTH ORGANIZATION
Editorial Note on Part 416
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 416 appear at 68 FR 53509, Sept. 11, 2003.

§ 416.203 Initial determinations of SSI eligibility. ( a ) *What happens when you apply for SSI benefits.* When you apply for SSI benefits we will ask you for documents and any other information we need to make sure you meet all the requirements. We will ask for information about your income and resources and about other eligibility requirements and you must answer completely. We will help you get any documents you need but do not have.
( b ) *How we determine your eligibility for SSI benefits.* We determine that you are eligible for SSI benefits for a given month if you meet the requirements in § 416.202 in that month. However, you cannot become eligible for payment of SSI benefits until the month after the month in which you first become eligible for SSI benefits (see § 416.501). In addition, we usually determine the amount of your SSI benefits for a month based on your income in an earlier month (see § 416.420). Thus, it is possible for you to meet the eligibility requirements in a given month but receive no benefit payment for that month.
[47 FR 3103, Jan. 22, 1982, as amended at 50 FR 48570, Nov. 26, 1985; 64 FR 31972, June 15, 1999]
### §343a. Repealed. Pub. L. 106–554, §1(a)(1) [title V, §517], Dec. 21, 2000, 114 Stat. 2763, 2763A–73

Section, Pub. L. 95–203, §4(c), (d), Nov. 23, 1977, 91 Stat. 1453, 1454, related to distribution of information on health risks of saccharin.
EXHIBIT 15-11

DTE Energy Company and





We have made a review, in accordance with standards established
by the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants, of the
 unaudited interim financial information of DTE Energy Company
and subsidiaries and of The Detroit Edison Company and
subsidiaries for the periods ended June 30, 1999 and 1998,
as indicated in our report dated July 28, 1999. Because we
did not perform an audit, we expressed no opinion on that
information.

We are aware that our report referred to above, which is included
 in your Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended
 June 30, 1999, is incorporated by reference in the
following Registration Statements:

|                           |  |                    
|-------------------------- |  | -------------------
|Form                       |  | Registration Number
|                           |  |                    
|DTE Energy Company         |  |                    
|Form S-3                   |  | 33-57545           
|Form S-8                   |  | 333-00023          
|                          
|                          
|                          
|                          
|                          
|                          
|                          
|                          
|                          
|                          
|                          
|                          
|                          
|                          
|                          
|                          
|                          
|                          
|                          
|                          
|                          
|                          
|                          
|                          
|                          
|                          
|                          
|                          
|                          
|                          
|                          
|                          
|                          
|                          
|                          
|                          
|                          
|                          
|                          
|                          
|                          
|                          
|                          
|                          
|                          
|                          
|                          
|                          
|The Detroit Edison Company |  |                    
|Form S-3                   |  | 33-53207           
|Form S-3                   |  | 33-64296           
|Form S-3                   |  | 333-65765          

We also are aware that the aforementioned report, pursuant to
Rule 436(c) under the Securities Act of 1933, is not
considered a part of the Registration Statement prepared or
certified by an accountant or a report prepared or certified by
an accountant within the meaning of Sections 7 and 11 of
that Act.

DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP

Detroit, Michigan
u.s. Deportment 

of Tronsportatlon 

Federal Aviation 

Administration 

Mr. Kirk Hawkins 

CEO & Founder 

ICON Aircraft 

12511 Beatrice Street 

Los Angeles, CA 90066 

Dear Mr. Hawkins: 

Z 0 ll : L\Y I b P I : 3 J 

Small Airplane Directorate 

901 Locust 

Kansas City, Missouri 64106 

This letter is to infonn you that we have received and begun processing your petition for 

exemption. It acknowledges receipt of the petition and describes how we wiLl process it. 

We Have the Petition 

We have received yourMay 7, 2012, petition on behalfofiCON Aircraft (ICON) for an 

exemption from certain sections ofparts 21, 61, and43 ofTitle 14, Code ofFcderal Regu.lations 

( 14 CFR). This exemption~ if granted., woldd allow ICON to incorporate a Spin-Resistant 

Airframe (SRA) in the ICON AS at a weight above the current Light-Sport Aircratl (LSA) 

definition. 

We have added your petition to the public docket (No. FAA-2012-0514) and we arc processing 

iL We will contact you if we need additional infonna.tion. 

How We Will Process the Petition 

A petition for an exemption, according to§ ll.63(d), .must be sent to the FAA at least 120 days 

before the proposed effective date ofthe exemption. In addition, we publish a summary of the 

petition in the Federal Register for public comment unJess, according to § 11.87, we determine 

that good cause ex:ists for n.ot publishing it. 

We will advise you of the agency's 1:inal decision on your petition as soon as possible. If you 

have any questions in the meantime, you may contact Mr. Terry L Chasteen, Light-Sport Aircraft 

Program Manager, ACE-114, Programs & Procedures Branch, SrnalJ Airplane Directorate at 

816-329-41.47 or teny.chasteen@faa.gov. 

Sincerely, 

Earl 

t:at~ Lawrence, Manager. 

Small Airplane Directorate 

Aircraft Certification Service
#### § 418.3680 What happens if your case is remanded by a Federal court?

When a Federal court remands a case to the Commissioner for further consideration, the decision-maker (as described in § 418.3625) acting on behalf of the Commissioner, may make a decision. That component will follow the procedures in § 418.3625, unless we decide that we can make a decision that is fully favorable to you without another hearing. Any issues relating to your subsidy may be considered by the decision-maker whether or not they were raised in the administrative proceedings leading to the final decision in your case.

[70 FR 77675, Dec. 30, 2005, as amended at 75 FR 33169, June 11, 2010]
### §1461c. Omitted

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section, Pub. L. 90–470, title V, Aug. 9, 1968, 82 Stat. 690, which related to a one year extension to existing appointments and assignments to the Foreign Service Reserve for foreign information and educational activities which would otherwise have expired, was not repeated in subsequent appropriation acts. Similar provisions were contained in the following prior appropriation acts:

Nov. 8, 1967, Pub. L. 90–133, title V, 81 Stat. 433.

Nov. 8, 1966, Pub. L. 89–797, title V, 80 Stat. 1504, 1505.

Sept. 2, 1965, Pub. L. 89–164, title V, 79 Stat. 643.

Aug. 31, 1964, Pub. L. 88–527, title V, 78 Stat. 734.

Dec. 30, 1963, Pub. L. 88–245, title V, 77 Stat. 800.

Oct. 18, 1962, Pub. L. 87–843, title V, 76 Stat. 1104.

Sept. 21, 1961, Pub. L. 87–264, title IV, 75 Stat. 558.

Aug. 31, 1960, Pub. L. 86–678, title IV, 74 Stat. 569.

July 13, 1959, Pub. L. 86–84, title IV, 73 Stat. 194.

June 30, 1958, Pub. L. 85–474, title IV, 72 Stat. 258.

June 11, 1957, Pub. L. 85–49, title IV, 71 Stat. 68.

June 20, 1956, ch. 414, title IV, 70 Stat. 312.

July 7, 1955, ch. 279, title IV, 69 Stat. 279.

July 2, 1954, ch. 456, title IV, 68 Stat. 432.
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Southern National Bancorp of Virginia, Inc. (SNBV) on Form 10-K for the period ending December 31, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on the date hereof (the Report), the undersigned Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial officer of SNBV hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
that based on their knowledge and belief: 1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and 2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of SNBV as of and for the periods covered in the Report.



|                                           
|-------------------------------------------
|                                           
|/s/ Georgia S. Derrico                     
|Georgia S. Derrico, Chief Executive Officer
|                                           
|/s/ William H. Lagos                       
|William H. Lagos, Chief Financial Officer  

March 15,
2011
Abatement Order filed July 26, 2018

In The 

## Fourteenth Court of Appeals

____________ NO. 14

- 18

- 00475

- CV

____________ IN THE INTEREST OF L .E.B, A CHILD

On Appeal from the County Court at Law No

. 1

Galveston County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 10FD0110



### ABATEMENT ORDER
This appeal is from a judgment signed March 29, 2018. A motion for new trial was untimely filed June 6, 2018. The record reflects the notice of appeal was filed June 11, 2018

. Appellant alleges she did not receive notice of the judgment until June 21,
2018 . Pursuant to Texas Rule of Civil Procedure 306a, a ppellant must provide a written order signed by the trial court finding the date when appellant first either
received notice or acquired actual knowledge the judgment was signed. See Tex. R. App. P. 4.2(c); s ee also LDF Construction, Inc. v. Texas Friends of ChabadLubavitch, Inc. , 459 S.W.3d 720, 724 (Tex. App.

— Houston [14th Dist.] 2015, no

pet.) (the date must be established b y competent proof and included in a written order signed by the trial judge). Accordingly, we order the case abated and remanded to the trial court for a hearing and entry of an order finding the date when appellant first either received notice or acquir ed actual knowledge that the order was signed. A supplemental
clerk ’ s record containing the trial court ’ s order shall be filed with the clerk of this

court within 30 days of the date of this order

. The appeal is abated, treated as a closed case, and remov ed from this Court ’ s active docket. The appeal will be reinstated on this Court ’ s active docket when the supplemental clerk ’ s record is filed in this Court. The Court will also consider an appropriate motion to reinstate the appeal filed by either party, o r the Court may reinstate the appeal on its own motion. It is the responsibility of any party seeking reinstatement to request a hearing date from the trial court and to schedule a hearing, if a hearing is required, in compliance with this Court ’s order. I f the parties do not request a hearing, the court coordinator of the trial court shall set a hearing date and notify the parties of such date.

PER CURIAM
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

DAY ELEV

 909.97

 910.73

 911.08

 911.34

 911.49

 911.57

 911.55

 911.61

 911.70

 911.77

 911.77

 911.86

 911.98

 912.12

 912.30

 912.46

 912.61

 912.83

 912.93

 913.04

 913.33

 913.38

 913.26

 913.26

 913.24

 913.30

 913.31

 913.14

 913.09

 913.03

 1,291.5

 1,301.3

 1,305.8

 1,309.1

 1,311.1

 1,312.1

 1,311.9

 1,312.7

 1,313.8

 1,314.7

 1,314.7

 1,315.9

 1,317.5

 1,319.3

 1,321.6

 1,323.7

 1,325.7

 1,328.6

 1,329.9

 1,331.3

 1,335.1

 1,335.8

 1,334.2

 1,334.2

 1,333.9

 1,334.7

 1,334.9

 1,332.6

 1,332.0

 1,331.2

STORAGE

+8.7

+9.8

+4.5

+3.4

+1.9

+1.0

-0.3

+0.8

+1.2

+0.9

+0.0

+1.2

+1.6

+1.8

+2.4

+2.1

+2.0

+2.9

+1.3

+1.4

+3.8

+0.7

-1.6

+0.0

-0.3

+0.8

+0.1

-2.2

-0.7

-0.8

CHANGE

 9,475

 8,405

 6,883

 6,300

 4,357

 4,216

 4,008

 4,293

 4,408

 3,837

 3,734

 4,400

 4,182

 3,960

 3,886

 3,583

 3,578

 3,772

 3,539

 3,167

 4,460

 2,753

 2,222

 3,033

 3,184

 3,518

 3,464

 2,666

 3,173

 2,960

INFLOW

 5,089

 3,402

 4,587

 4,557

 3,357

 3,682

 4,120

 3,870

 3,811

 3,337

 3,730

 3,803

 3,389

 3,031

 2,594

 2,487

 2,578

 2,288

 2,845

 2,437

 2,475

 2,363

 3,014

 2,998

 3,298

 3,105

 3,363

 3,754

 3,486

 3,300

POWER

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

SPILL

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

OUTLET

 0

 68

 19

 42

 19

 11

 19

 31

 8

 42

 4

 8

 8

 8

 107

 42

 12

 35

 35

 4

 62

 58

 4

 35

 19

 15

 35

 39

 19

 58

C.F.S.

 .00

 .18

 .05

 .11

 .05

 .03

 .05

 .08

 .02

 .11

 .01

 .02

 .02

 .02

 .28

 .11

 .03

 .09

 .09

 .01

 .16

 .15

 .01

 .09

 .05

 .04

 .09

 .10

 .05

 .15

INCHES

 1.48

 .74

 .09

 1.40

 .00

 .11

 .00

 .00

 .17

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .01

 .00

 .00

 .01

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

PRECIP

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

NOVEMBER 2008 SHASTA LAKE DAILY OPERATIONS RUN DATE: December 1, 2008

IN LAKE

EVAPORATION

INCHES

C.F.S.

COMPUTED*

1000 ACRE-FEET

RELEASE - C.F.S.

RIVER

TOTALS +48.4 125,416 100,150 0 0 866 2.25 4.01

ACRE-FEET +48,400 248,763 198,648 0 0 1,718

COMMENTS:

* COMPUTED INFLOW IS THE SUM OF CHANGE IN STORAGE, RELEASES AND EVAPORATION.

SUMMARY

RELEASE (ACRE-FEET)

POWER 198,648

SPILL 0

OUTLET

TOTAL

 0

 198,648

PRECIPITATION

THIS MONTH =

TO DATE =

 4.01

JULY 1, 2008 7.21

 1,282.8
#### In the Matter of the Claim of Frank L. Paul, Appellant, against New York Times et al., Respondents. State Industrial Board, Respondent.

All concur.
### §286e–10. Repealed. Pub. L. 97–35, title XIII, §1371(a)(1), Aug. 13, 1981, 95 Stat. 746

Section, act July 31, 1945, ch. 339, §31, as added Oct. 10, 1978, Pub. L. 95–435, §4, 92 Stat. 1052, required an annual report to Congress on the status of internationally recognized human rights in each country which draws on funds under the Supplementary Financing Facility of the International Monetary Fund.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date of Repeal

Repeal effective Aug. 13, 1981, see section 1372 of Pub. L. 97–35, set out as an Effective Date note under section 290i of this title.