alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
### §2802. Federal recognition

#### (a) Eligibility requirements

Any international exposition proposed to be held in the United States shall be eligible on application from its sponsors to receive the recognition of the Federal Government upon a finding of the President that recognition will be in the national interest. In making such a finding the President shall consider—

(1) a report by the Secretary of Commerce which shall include (A) an evaluation of purposes and reasons for the exposition, and (B) a determination that guaranteed financial and other support has been secured by the exposition from affected State and local governments and from business and civic leadership of the region and others in amounts sufficient in his judgment to assure the successful development and progress of the exposition;

(2) a report by the Secretary of State that the proposed exposition qualifies for consideration of registration by the Bureau of International Expositions (hereafter referred to as BIE); and

(3) such other evidence as the President may consider to be appropriate.

#### (b) Recognition and registration procedure; compliance with international convention; participation by States and foreign governments

Upon a finding by the President that an international exposition is eligible for Federal recognition, the President may take such measures recognizing the exposition as he deems proper, including, but not limited to—

(1) presenting of an official request by the United States for registration of the exposition by the BIE;

(2) providing for fulfillment of the requirements of the Convention of November 22, 1928, as amended, relating to international expositions; and

(3) extending invitations, by proclamation or by such other manner he deems proper, to the several States of the Union and to foreign governments to take part in the exposition, provided that he shall not extend such an invitation until he has been notified officially of BIE registration for the exposition.

#### (c) Report to Congress

The President shall report his actions under this section promptly to the Congress.

(Pub. L. 91–269, §2, May 27, 1970, 84 Stat. 271.)
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

DAY ELEVATION

 252.48

 252.43

 252.46

 252.43

 252.41

 252.48

 252.52

 252.45

 252.52

 252.44

 252.57

 252.55

 252.53

 252.47

 252.55

 252.55

 252.48

 252.57

 252.59

 252.50

 252.51

 252.55

 252.55

 252.62

 252.48

 252.45

 252.55

 252.50

 252.58

 252.62

 3,914

 3,889

 3,904

 3,889

 3,879

 3,914

 3,933

 3,899

 3,933

 3,894

 3,958

 3,948

 3,938

 3,909

 3,948

 3,948

 3,914

 3,958

 3,968

 3,924

 3,928

 3,948

 3,948

 3,983

 3,914

 3,899

 3,948

 3,924

 3,963

 3,983

STORAGE

+15

-25

+15

-15

-10

+35

+19

-34

+34

-39

+64

-10

-10

-29

+39

+0

-34

+44

+10

-44

+4

+20

+0

+35

-69

-15

+49

-24

+39

+20

CHANGE

 1,013

 1,002

 853

 868

 854

 868

 847

 837

 820

 688

 769

 751

 890

 887

 888

 837

 1,213

 1,197

 1,117

 1,095

 1,120

 1,061

 1,122

 1,185

 1,161

 1,119

 1,046

 1,062

 924

 969

 9,078

 10,122

 10,110

 9,774

 9,642

 10,098

 10,194

 10,230

 10,230

 10,290

 10,434

 10,698

 10,254

 10,362

 10,470

 11,730

 10,470

 11,790

 11,790

 12,150

 11,790

 12,150

 12,930

 13,086

 13,350

 12,990

 14,334

 13,230

 13,830

 13,698

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

JUNE 2007 RED BLUFF DIVERSION RESERVOIR DAILY OPERATIONS RUN DATE: July 2, 2007

IN LAKE

CANAL

 ACRE-FEET

TOTALS +84 29,063 341,304

ACRE-FEET +84 57,646 676,976

SUMMARY

RELEASE (ACRE-FEET)

TOTAL 739,537

 3,899

RELEASE

RIVER

CORNING TO SACTO

CANAL

RELEASE C.F.S.

TEHAMA

COLUSA

 90

 53

 69

 500

 85

 50

 62

 67

 54

 41

 27

 60

 79

 60

 93

 71

 69

 42

 77

 78

 92

 63

 75

 75

 45

 91

 76

 90

 73

 71

 2,478

 4,915

CORNING CANAL 4,915

TEHAMA-COLUSA CANAL 57,646

TO SACTO RIVER 676,976
# Methane Detectors Challenge

Catalyzing next generation air emissions monitors to tackle methane pollution

Environmental Defense Fund and seven oil and natural gas companies are challenging technology developers and engineers to design cutting

- edge, new methane monitors that can help the oil and gas industry better detect, and ultimately reduce, methane emissions.

Methane is a pressing climate issue with enormous environmental upside when reduced. In many cases, there are also economic advantages for oil and gas companies to capture gas for sales that is otherwise leaked. Advancing technologies that make it easier for companies to continuously detect methane leaks is the goal of the challenge.

Learn more about the four technologies selected for phase 2 testing in the Methane Detectors Challenge.



### State of the Challenge

EDF and its partners collaboratively selected five applicants whose technologies are being test ed by Southwest Research Institute (SwRI), one of the nation’s largest and most well

- established, independent applied research organizations. Laboratory testing of the five technologies was conducted in fall 2014 at SwRI.

The technologies performed well in detecting methane concentrations over a range of temperature and humidity conditions. Four of the technologies(Dalian Actech/SenSevere, SenseAir AB, Quanta3 and University of

Colorado/NDP Group) were selected by EDF and the participating companies
to adv ance to second phase field testing, which is proceeding at SwRI in San Antonio, Texas throughout late spring and summer of 2015, providing more intensive indoor and outdoor testing and evaluation.

The selection panel is being advised by independent experts from Aerodyne, the Environmental Protection Agency and the Houston Advanced Research Center, in addition to others from the research and technology communities. It is expected that later in 2015, the top performing technologies will be
selected for intern ational industry pilot purchases and trial deployments, testing the most promising technologies in the field at participating oil and gas company facilities.
### §1929. Repealed. Pub. L. 87–195, pt. III, §642(a)(2), Sept. 4, 1961, 75 Stat. 460

Section, acts Aug. 26, 1954, ch. 937, ch. II, §409, 68 Stat. 845; July 8, 1955, ch. 301, §8(g), 69 Stat. 286; July 18, 1956, ch. 627, §8(g), 70 Stat. 558; Aug. 14, 1957, Pub. L. 85–141, §8(i), 71 Stat. 361; June 30, 1958, Pub. L. 85–477, ch. II, §205(g), 72 Stat. 267; July 24, 1959, Pub. L. 86–108, ch. II, §205(i), 73 Stat. 250; May 14, 1960, Pub. L. 86–472, ch. II, §204(i), 74 Stat. 137, authorized payment of ocean freight charges and provided for arrangements for free entry.
Exhibit 31.2



I, Fernando Fussa, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of Southern Trust Securities Holding Corp. (the Registrant);

2.  Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3.  Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the Registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4.   The Registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the Registrant and have:

a)  Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the Registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

b)   [Paragraph omitted pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934]

c)  Evaluated the effectiveness of the Registrants disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

d)  Disclosed in this report any change in the Registrants internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the Registrants most recent fiscal quarter (the Registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the Registrants internal control over financial reporting; and

5.   The Registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the Registrants auditors and the audit committee of the Registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

a)  All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the Registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

b)  Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the Registrants internal control over financial reporting.



| |              |                                       
| | ------------ | --------------------------------------
| | By:          | /s/ Fernando Fussa                    
| | Name:
Title: | Fernando Fussa
Chief Financial Officer

Date: March 28, 2008



16
(No. 6781

#### Norm A. Hagman, M.D., S.C., Claimant, vs. State of Illinois, Department of Mental Health, Respondent.

*Opinion filed August 10, 1972.*

Dr. Norm A. Hagman, Claimant, pro se.

William J. Scott, Attorney General; Saul R. Wexler, Assistant Attorney General, for Respondent.

*49Perlin, C.J.
From: <james.tamm@dot.gov>

To: <Chandana_L._Achanta@omb.eop.gov>

Cc: William Charmley/AA/USEPA/US@EPA, Robin Moran/AA/USEPA/US@EPA, <rebecca.yoon@dot.gov>, <Steve.Wood@dot.gov>

Date: 09/30/2010 05:09 PM

Subject: FW: Revised TAR and NOI

Chandana,

Attached are clean versions of the 2017-2025 CAFE and GHG NOI and TAR. The agencies consider these 

the final versions, and intend to upload these documents to ROCIS shortly. 

Please confirm interagency concurrence.

Thank you in advance.

Jim
**Exhibit32.1**

**CERTIFICATIONPURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**ASADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906**

**OFTHE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

In connection withthe Annual Report of Linn Energy, LLC (the “Company”) on Form 10-K for the yearended December 31, 2006 as filed with the Securities and ExchangeCommission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Michael C. Linn, President andChief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C § 1350,as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

1. The Report fully complies with the requirements ofSection 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2. The information contained in the Report fairlypresents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results ofoperations of the Company.

 
| * * | /s/  MICHAEL C. LINN                        |
|----------|--------------------------------------------------|
|     | Michael C. Linn                                  |
|     | Chairman, President and  Chief Executive Officer |

 

Date: March 30, 2007

 

----
#### § 429.209 Are there any restrictions on attorney's fees?

No more than 10 percent of the amount in settlement of each individual claim submitted and settled under this subpart shall be paid or delivered to, or received by, any agent or attorney on account of services rendered in connection with that claim. A person violating this subsection shall be fined not more than $1,000.00 (31 U.S.C. 3721(i)).
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY ELEV

 959.22

 959.32

 959.48

 960.14

 960.36

 960.55

 960.61

 960.89

 961.10

 961.06

 961.04

 961.20

 961.52

 961.72

 961.82

 962.01

 962.04

 962.04

 962.12

 962.23

 962.30

 962.40

 962.45

 962.63

 962.72

 962.98

 963.28

 963.62

 963.97

 964.31

 964.64

 2,033.2

 2,035.0

 2,037.8

 2,049.3

 2,053.1

 2,056.4

 2,057.5

 2,062.4

 2,066.0

 2,065.3

 2,065.0

 2,067.8

 2,073.4

 2,076.9

 2,078.7

 2,082.0

 2,082.6

 2,082.6

 2,084.0

 2,085.9

 2,087.1

 2,088.9

 2,089.8

 2,093.0

 2,094.6

 2,099.2

 2,104.5

 2,110.5

 2,116.7

 2,122.8

 2,128.7

STORAGE

+1.6

+1.7

+2.8

+11.5

+3.8

+3.3

+1.0

+4.9

+3.7

-0.7

-0.4

+2.8

+5.6

+3.5

+1.8

+3.3

+0.5

+0.0

+1.4

+1.9

+1.2

+1.8

+0.9

+3.2

+1.6

+4.6

+5.3

+6.0

+6.2

+6.1

+5.9

CHANGE

 3,551

 3,760

 3,926

 8,554

 4,589

 4,918

 3,616

 5,053

 3,917

 2,502

 3,308

 4,805

 6,119

 4,251

 3,850

 4,160

 3,331

 3,053

 3,614

 3,971

 3,517

 3,848

 3,254

 4,407

 3,731

 4,450

 5,671

 5,553

 5,884

 5,811

 5,913

INFLOW

 2,723

 2,871

 2,477

 2,738

 2,648

 3,241

 3,083

 2,579

 2,043

 2,830

 3,470

 3,378

 3,250

 2,470

 2,929

 2,456

 3,012

 2,960

 2,803

 2,929

 2,836

 2,927

 2,804

 2,768

 2,893

 2,092

 2,980

 2,502

 2,744

 2,733

 2,934

POWER

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

SPILL

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

OUTLET

 36

 10

 41

 10

 5

 5

 5

 10

 21

 26

 15

 10

 36

 10

 36

 21

 52

 93

 99

 62

 57

 31

 5

 36

 36

 42

 5

 5

 5

 16

 5

C.F.S.

 .07

 .02

 .08

 .02

 .01

 .01

 .01

 .02

 .04

 .05

 .03

 .02

 .07

 .02

 .07

 .04

 .10

 .18

 .19

 .12

 .11

 .06

 .01

 .07

 .07

 .08

 .01

 .01

 .01

 .03

 .01

INCHES

 .00

 .09

 .27

 1.25

 1.12

 .02

 .25

 .45

 .01

 .01

 .00

 .17

 .92

 .01

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .02

 .00

 .00

 .10

 .00

 1.75

 1.68

 .64

 .61

 .23

PRECIP

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

JANUARY 2021 SHASTA LAKE DAILY OPERATIONS RUN DATE: February 2, 2021

IN LAKE

EVAPORATION

INCHES

C.F.S.

COMPUTED*

1000 ACRE-FEET

RELEASE - C.F.S.

RIVER

TOTALS +96.8 136,887 87,103 0 0 846 1.64 9.60

ACRE-FEET +96,800 271,515 172,769 0 0 1,678

COMMENTS:

* COMPUTED INFLOW IS THE SUM OF CHANGE IN STORAGE, RELEASES AND EVAPORATION.

SUMMARY

RELEASE (ACRE-FEET)

POWER 172,769

SPILL 0

OUTLET

TOTAL

 0

 172,769

PRECIPITATION

THIS MONTH =

TO DATE =

 9.60

JULY 1, 2020 14.89

 2,031.6

Table 3

OCT 1, 2020 TO DATE = 14.86
Exhibit 32.1


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                           18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS
                         ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906
                        OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss.1350, as adopted pursuant to ss.906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned officer of John Hancock Financial
Services, Inc. (the "Company"), hereby certifies, to his knowledge, that: (1)
the Company's amended quarterly report on Form 10-Q/A for the quarter ended
September 30, 2004, (the "Report") fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and (2) the information
contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
condition and results of operations of the Company as of and for the periods
presented in the Report.

Dated: February 10, 2005

                                /s/ JOHN D. DESPREZ, III
                                ---------------------------
                                Name:  John D. DesPrez, III
                                Title: President and Chief Executive Officer
Editorial Note on Part 416
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 416 appear at 68 FR 53509, Sept. 11, 2003.

§ 416.1325 Suspension due to status as a resident of a public institution. ( a ) Except as provided in § 416.211 (b) and (c), a recipient is ineligible for benefits for the first full calendar month in which he or she is a resident of a public institution (as defined in § 416.201) throughout the calendar month (as defined in § 416.211(a)), and payments are suspended effective with such first full month. Such ineligibility continues for so long as such individual remains a resident of a public institution.
( b ) *Resumption of payments.* If benefits are otherwise payable, they will be resumed effective with the earliest day of the month in which a recipient is no longer a resident of a public institution. See § 416.421. A transfer from one public institution to another or a temporary absence from the institution lasting 14 days or less, however, will not change his or her status as a resident, and the suspension will continue.
[51 FR 13494, Apr. 21, 1986]
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

DAY HIGH

 187

 182

 187

 187

 189

 194

 195

 196

 208

 210

 211

 213

 214

 219

 218

 220

 218

 216

 212

 207

 202

 195

 196

 198

 200

 201

 207

 206

 161

 157

 151

 158

 171

 182

 172

 170

 179

 175

 186

 189

 188

 183

 176

 180

 176

 174

 172

 146

 135

 132

 137

 141

 154

 167

 161

 143

 177

 172

 174

 175

 182

 188

 185

 187

 197

 198

 202

 206

 207

 208

 208

 210

 201

 199

 192

 183

 173

 163

 166

 172

 184

 184

 187

 180

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

FEBRUARY 2011 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: March 30, 2011

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

SAN ANDREAS ON THE SAN JOAQUIN RIVER
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                                       5


<S>                                                   <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                       3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                                   MAY-31-2001
<PERIOD-END>                                        NOV-30-2000
<CASH>                                                  3195038
<SECURITIES>                                                  0
<RECEIVABLES>                                          21212028
<ALLOWANCES>                                                  0
<INVENTORY>                                            18921501
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                       47242236
<PP&E>                                                 25848394
<DEPRECIATION>                                          8997775
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                        103413382
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                  25230304
<BONDS>                                                36938896
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                         0
<PREFERRED>                                                   0
<COMMON>                                                 727762
<OTHER-SE>                                             36879670
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                          103413382
<SALES>                                                16813264
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                       16813264
<CGS>                                                   8839249
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                           8839249
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                        7580845
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                              0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                       814026
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                         (361973)
<INCOME-TAX>                                             250276
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                     (612249)
<DISCONTINUED>                                                0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                               0
<CHANGES>                                                     0
<NET-INCOME>                                            (612249)
<EPS-BASIC>                                               (0.08)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                             (0.08)



</TABLE>
[if !vml]>[endif]>

[if !vml]>[endif]>

You have reached the FederalDepository Library Program Electronic Collection (FDLP/EC) Archive. Thisarchive assures ongoing access to publications in the FDLP/EC. Access topublications in the archive is available through GPO's suite of cataloging andlocator services, including the Catalog of U.S. Government Publications(CGP).  Archived copies of publications are retrieved in the event thatpublications are no longer available from the original publishing agency site. 
**Title:****Water quality in theMississippi Embayment : Texas coastal uplands aquifer system and MississippiRiver Valley alluvial aquifer, south-central United States, 1994-2008 /**
 
Report | Appendix 3
 
SuDoc Number:I 19.4/2:1356
Item Number:0620-A (online)
CGP systemNumber:000942768
 
April 26, 2018
**EXHIBIT 23.1****CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**     We consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration Statement No. 333-126522 on FormS-8 of our report on the consolidated financial statements of Volcom, Inc. and subsidiaries datedMarch 14, 2007, (which report expresses an unqualified opinion and includes an explanatoryparagraph relating to the adoption of Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 123R,*Share-Based Payment*, in 2006) and our report on management’s report on the effectiveness ofinternal control over financial reporting appearing in this Annual Report on Form 10-K of Volcom,Inc. for the year ended December 31, 2006./s/ Deloitte & Touche LLP
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 06-7425

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, versus WILL ROGER JONES, Defendant - Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Charleston. David C. Norton, District Judge. (2:00-cr-00446-FBH; 2:03-cv-03861-DCN) Submitted: December 14, 2006 Decided: December 21, 2006 Before MICHAEL, GREGORY, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Will Roger Jones, Appellant Pro Se. Alston Calhoun Badger, Jr., Assistant United States Attorney, Charleston, South Carolina, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.- 2 - PER CURIAM: Will Roger Jones seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (2000) motion. The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1) (2000). A certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2000). A prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that any assessment of the constitutional claims by the district court is debatable or wrong and that any dispositive procedural ruling by the district court is likewise debatable. Miller-El v. Cockrell , 537 U.S. 322, 336-38 (2003); Slack v. McDaniel , 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000); Rose v. Lee , 252 F.3d 676, 683-84 (4th Cir. 2001). We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Jones has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and di smiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED