alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Hon. Richard S. Morris.

County Attorney Opinion No. 

### O-3037. Armstrong County ,~ : Rer Validity of maturity schedule Claude, Texas of bonds voted bythe Claude Independent School District. Dear Sir: Weare in rece$pt,of~your letter of January 

### 8,requesting our opinion upon the question arising from,the following state of facts:

“The Claude Independent School Ikstrict recently voted $14,000 in bonds for certain authorized purposes andthe petition order of, election. aud notlce thereof set forth ihe’ following ,maturity schedule of such bonds: ‘To become due andpayable serially 

### $500.00ten years from their date and $500.- 00 each year thereafter up to andincluding the 

### 1961. and .$lOO.OOeach year thereafter during theyear years 

### 1962to 

### 1970,both inclusive, ***ID Article 

### 2786,of Vernon@s Annotated Civil Statutes, provides that bonds of independent school districts shall mature in serial annual Installments over a period of not exceeding forty years from their date. This department has heretofore construed this language of the statute to require all bonds voted by a school district to mature in serial annual Installments in one year hthe first of which installments shall maturewithromthe date of the issuance of such bonds and that for each year thereafter up to the final maturity 8ate a portion of the principal must be retired. Suchhas been the construction andrule of this department since the enactment of the statute.

We, therefore, advise that wewill be unable to approve bonds of Claude Independent School District providing a maturity schedule such as is outlined in your letter. Further9 weare of the opinion that another election will benecessary for the reason that the statutes provide that whenever the proposition to issue bonds is to be voted on in anyindependent school district the petition,

?A.netlv soeci election order andthe notice of election must dls fe the amountof the bonds, the rate ofHon. Richard S.. Zorris, page 2

interest, their maturity dates bonds are to be used. andthe purpose for which the Andfor the Board of Trustees to attempt to Issue the bonds ona maturity schedule different from that contained in the petition, election order andnotice of election, would, wethink, be contrary to law. In other words, the bonds issued by the Board of Trustees would not be in conformity with the bonds authorized by the voters, without whose authorit the bonds could not be issued. Se&ion c 

### SeeArticle2784,

, Vernon's Annotated Civil Statutes. Yours very truly ATTORNEY

GENERAL

OFTEXAS B /s/ Clarence E. Crowe C Parence E. Crowe, Assistant APPROVED

JAN22, 

### 1941 /s/ Grover Sellers FIRSTASSISTANT

ATTORNEY

GENERAL ~APPROVED:

OPINIONCOMMITTEE BY: BWB,CHAIRMAN CEC:s:wb
**Exhibit 23.1****CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**     We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in theRegistration Statement onForm S-8(No. 333-130615)of Superior Well Services, Inc. of our report datedMarch 6, 2006, relating to the consolidated financialstatements of Superior Well Services, Inc. as ofDecember 31, 2004 and 2005 and for each of the three yearsin the period ended December 31, 2005 and the financialstatement schedule listed in Item 15(b), appearing in thisannual report onForm 10-K ofSuperior Well Services, Inc. for the year endedDecember 31, 2005.    /s/ Schneider Downs &    Co., Inc.          Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania     March 6, 2006
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
<CURRENCY> U.S. DOLLARS

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   OTHER
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JAN-29-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             AUG-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               OCT-30-1999
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<CASH>                                          34,055
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  179,645
<ALLOWANCES>                                     7,119
<INVENTORY>                                    781,769
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             1,006,038
<PP&E>                                       1,431,683
<DEPRECIATION>                                 567,513
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               2,155,339
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          942,255
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           304
<OTHER-SE>                                     662,169
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 2,155,339
<SALES>                                      2,639,329
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             2,649,205
<CGS>                                        2,088,997
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                2,577,426
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              34,195
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 93,727
<INCOME-TAX>                                    37,211
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                (3,776)
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    52,740
<EPS-BASIC>                                       1.90
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.87


</TABLE>
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF

THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the annual report on Form 10-K of Ruths Hospitality Group, Inc. (the
Company) for the year ended December 27, 2009, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), the undersigned, the President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certifies,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1)
The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Date: March 5, 2010



By

/s/ Michael P. ODonnellMichael P. ODonnellPresident and Chief Executive Officer of Ruths Hospitality Group, Inc.
#### Henry Hornstein et al. v. Paramount Pictures, Inc., et al., Impleaded with Others.

Present — Martin, P. J., Untermyer, Dore, Cohn and Callahan, JJ.
#### John D. Tutt, appellant, v. George C. Hawkins, appellee.

Filed January 3, 1898.

No. 7719.

Elections: Ballots: Intention oe Elector. The intention of an elector must be ascertained from his ballot, and any inaccuracies in the preparation of such ballot cannot be urged for the first time after an election, to defeat the clearly expressed intention of the voter.

Appeal from the district court of Cass county.' Heard below before Chapman, J.

*Reversed.*

*Matthew Gering,*for appellant.

*A. J'.*Graves, *contra.*

Ryan, C.

There was filed in the office of the clerk of the district court of Cass county a petition in which the plaintiff John D. Tutt alleged that at the municipal election held in the city of Plattsmouth on April 3, 1894, the whole number of votes cast for councilman of the Fifth ward was 194, of which 79 were for William Slater, 49 were for George C. Hawkins, the contestee, 40 were for said John D. Tutt, and 26 were for Edwin Bates;.that upon a canvass of said votes made by the city council of said city William Slater and George C. Hawkins were declared elected. It was futher alleged in the petition that the whole number of votes counted for councilman to fill *368a vacancy was 66, of which Tutt received 40 and Edwin Bates 26. By the answer of the contestee it was asserted that the votes cast for councilman for the Fifth ward were not canvassed with reference to filling a vacancy, but it was alleged that the four candidates were competitors for the office of councilman for' said ward, without reference to whether the candidacy was for the entire or for the unexpired term, and that, relying upon precedent, the candidate receiving the highest number of votes held the full term and the candidate receiving the next highest vote held the unexpired term. We need not consider the issues at greater length, for the question to be determined is whether or not it was proper to follow the alleged precedent. The official ballot with reference to councilman for the Fifth ward was printed as follows:

> “Edwin Bates (to fill vacancy) Republican

> “George O. Hawkins Republican

> “Wm. Slater Democrat

> “J. D. Tutt (to fill vacancy) Democrat”

It was correctly recited in the petition that Hawkins received 49 while Tutt received but 40 votes; but a reference to the form of ballot cast shows that the electors were not voting for them as rivals for the same office. The intention of the voter must be gathered from the ballot which he actually casts and cannot be defeated by evidence that the ballots were not prepared in accordance with the intention of a political convention by which one of the nominations was made. After an election held without, objection to the form of the ballot it is too late to question the result. *(State v. Norris, 37*Neb. 299.) The district court erred in reaching the conclusion which it did and its judgment is accordingly reversed.

Reversed and remanded.
Editorial Note on Part 25
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 25 appear by T.D. ATF-437, 66 FR 5478, 5479, Jan. 19, 2001.

§ 25.231 Finished beer. ( a ) A brewer may obtain beer in barrels and kegs, finished and ready for sale from another brewer. The purchasing brewer may furnish the producing brewer barrels and kegs marked with the purchasing brewer's name and location. The producing brewer shall pay the tax as provided in subpart K of this part.
( b ) A brewer may not purchase taxpaid or tax determined beer from another brewer in bottles or cans which bear the name and address of the purchasing brewer.
(Sec. 201, Pub. L. 85-859, 72 Stat. 1389, as amended (26 U.S.C. 5413))
#### § 220.20 Notice that an annuitant is no longer disabled.

The regulation explaining the Board's responsibilities in notifying the annuitant, and the annuitant's rights when the disability annuity is stopped is found in § 220.183.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

MIDDLE DISTRICT

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

Respondent

v.

KYLE LEE WILSON,

Petitioner

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 428 MAL 2019

Petition for Allowance of Appeal 

from the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 2nd day of July, 2024, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is 

DENIED.
### §9163. State and local initiatives

Nothing in this subchapter shall be construed to interfere with State and local initiatives and responsibility in the conduct of library services. The administration of libraries, the selection of personnel and library books and materials, and insofar as consistent with the purposes of this subchapter, the determination of the best uses of the funds provided under this subchapter, shall be reserved for the States and their local subdivisions.

(Pub. L. 94–462, title II, §263, as added Pub. L. 104–208, div. A, title I, §101(e) [title VII, §702], Sept. 30, 1996, 110 Stat. 3009–233, 3009–302.)
### §130aa–3. Withdrawals and expenditures

#### (a) Defrayment of expenses; restrictions on use of income or corpus; limits on withdrawals or expenditures

The University may withdraw and expend its endowment fund income to defray any expenses necessary to its operation, including expenses of operations and maintenance, administration, academic and support personnel, construction and renovation, community and student services programs, technical assistance, and research. No endowment fund income or corpus may be used for any type of support of the executive officers of the University or for any commercial enterprise or endeavor entered into after January 1, 1981. Except as provided in subsection (b), the University shall not, in the aggregate, withdraw or expend more than 50 per centum of the total aggregate endowment fund income earned prior to the time of withdrawal or expenditure.

#### (b) Authority of Secretary; withdrawal or expenditure beyond limits; circumstances demonstrating necessity

The Secretary is authorized to permit the University to withdraw or expend more than 50 per centum of its total aggregate endowment income whenever the University demonstrates such withdrawal or expenditure is necessary because of—

(A) a financial emergency, such as a pending insolvency or temporary liquidity problem;

(B) a life-threatening situation occasioned by a natural disaster or arson; or

(C) another unusual occurrence or exigent circumstance.

#### (c) Repayment of Federal share of amounts improperly expended or withdrawn; endowment fund corpus; income

(1) If the University withdraws or expends more than the endowment fund income authorized by this section, the University shall repay the Secretary an amount equal to 50 per centum of the amount improperly expended (representing the Federal share thereof).

(2) The University shall not withdraw or expend any endowment fund corpus. If the University withdraws or expends any endowment fund corpus, the University shall repay the Secretary an amount equal to 50 per centum of the amount withdrawn or expended (representing the Federal share thereof) plus any income earned thereon.

(Pub. L. 98–480, title II, §205, Oct. 17, 1984, 98 Stat. 2246.)
#### Irwin Rosenman, Respondent, v. Chase National Bank of the City of New York, Appellant.

No opinion. Present — Martin, P. J., Townley, Untermyer, Dore and Callahan, JJ.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
This schedule  contains summary financial  information  extracted from Form 10-Q
for the three months ended March 31, 1999 for May Limited Partnership 1983-2 and
is qualified in its entirety by reference to such Form 10-Q.
</LEGEND>
<CIK>                         0000735552
<NAME>                        May Limited Partnership 1983-2
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                                   MAR-31-1999
<CASH>                                         160
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  124
<ALLOWANCES>                                   0
<INVENTORY>                                    0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               0
<PP&E>                                         1,510
<DEPRECIATION>                                 0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 1,798
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          0
<BONDS>                                        0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       0
<OTHER-SE>                                     0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   1,798
<SALES>                                        148
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               150
<CGS>                                          0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  19
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                84
<INCOME-TAX>                                   0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            84
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   84
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  0
        


</TABLE>
##### 



EXHIBIT 31.1
WRITTEN STATEMENT OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Stanislas Vilgrain, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this report on Form 10-Q of Cuisine Solutions, Inc.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make
the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly
report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material
respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the
registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report.

4. The registrants other certifying officers and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and
have:
a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material
information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated
subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly
during the period in which this quarterly report is being
prepared;
b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and
procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of this
quarterly report (the Evaluation Date); and
c) presented in this quarterly report our conclusions about the effectiveness
of the disclosure controls and procedures based on our evaluation as of the
Evaluation Date;

5. The registrants other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on
our most recent evaluation, to the registrants auditors and the audit
committee of registrants board of directors (or persons performing the
equivalent functions):
a) all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal controls
which could adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process,
summarize and report financial data and have identified for the registrants
auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and
b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal controls;
and

6. The registrants other certifying officers and I have indicated in this
quarterly report whether there were significant changes in internal controls or
in other factors that could significantly affect internal controls subsequent
to the date of our most recent evaluation, including any corrective actions
with regard to significant deficiencies and material weaknesses.

Date: January 27, 2004

|                              |                    | 
|----------------------------- | ------------------ | 
|/s/                           | Stanislas Vilgrain
|                             
|Stanislas Vilgrain           
|Chief Executive Officer      
|(Principal Executive Officer)
#### John Grass, Jr., by John M. Grass, His Guardian ad Litem, Appellant, v. International Railway Company, Respondent.

Judgment and order affirmed, with costs. All concurred.
### §287j. Participation in future United Nations borrowing; promotion of pattern of financing to avoid future large-scale deficits; report to Congress

Nothing herein shall be regarded as authorizing the United States to participate in any future United Nations borrowing. It is the sense of the Congress that the United States shall use its best efforts to promote a pattern of United Nations financing (including a vigorous program for collection of delinquencies on annual assessments of nations and maintenance of such annual assessments on a current basis) that will avoid any future large-scale deficits.

(Pub. L. 87–731, §4, Oct. 2, 1962, 76 Stat. 696.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section originally contained a provision instructing the Department of State to submit to the Congress, not later than Jan. 31, 1963, a report on steps taken in the 17th Session of the General Assembly of the United Nations on long term financing of the United Nations which was omitted.

Section was not enacted as part of act Dec. 20, 1945, ch. 583, 59 Stat. 619, known as the United Nations Participation Act of 1945, which comprises this subchapter.
I 

114TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 4076 

To amend title XIX of the Social Security Act to allow for payments to 

States for substance abuse services furnished to inmates in public institutions, and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

NOVEMBER 18, 2015 

Mr. TURNER (for himself, Ms. FUDGE, and Ms. TSONGAS) introduced the 

following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Energy and Commerce 

A BILL 

To amend title XIX of the Social Security Act to allow 

for payments to States for substance abuse services furnished to inmates in public institutions, and for other 

purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘The Reforming and 

5 Expanding Access to Treatment Act’’ or the ‘‘TREAT 

6 Act’’. 


tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 4076 IH

1 SEC. 2. PAYMENTS TO STATES UNDER MEDICAID FOR SUB2 STANCE ABUSE SERVICES FURNISHED TO IN3 MATES IN PUBLIC INSTITUTIONS. 

4 Section 1905 of the Social Security Act (42 U.S.C. 

5 1396d)— 

6 (1) in subsection (a)(16)— 

7 (A) by striking ‘‘effective January 1, 

8 1973,’’ and inserting ‘‘(A) effective January 1, 

9 1973,’’; and 

10 (B) by inserting before the semicolon at 

11 the end the following: ‘‘and (B) qualified inpa12 tient substance use disorder services (as defined 

13 in such subsection) for inmates of a public in14 stitution (as such terms are defined for pur15 poses of applying the subdivision (A) that fol16 lows paragraph (29)’’; and 

17 (2) in subsection (h), by adding at the end the 

18 following new paragraph: 

19 ‘‘(3) For purposes of subsection (a)(16)(B), the term 

20 ‘qualified inpatient substance use disorder services’ means 

21 medication or behavioral treatment administered in fur22 therance of eliminating, mitigating, treating, or curing an 

23 individual’s use or abuse of drugs or an individual’s sub24 stance abuse disorder.’’. 


tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
3 

•HR 4076 IH

1 SEC. 3. NO SAMSHA POLICY AGAINST SUBSTANCE ABUSE 

2 TREATMENT FOR INCARCERATED INDIVID3 UALS. 

4 The Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services 

5 Administration shall not establish, maintain, or implement 

6 any memorandum of understanding or other policy that 

7 prohibits or restricts the Administration’s provision or 

8 support of substance abuse treatment or related services 

9 for incarcerated individuals, so long as such provision or 

10 support— 

11 (1) is statutorily authorized (by provisions of 

12 law other than this section) for such type of treat13 ment or services; and 

14 (2) not statutorily prohibited or restricted with 

15 respect to incarcerated individuals. 

Æ 


tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with BILLS