alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### § 422.5 District offices and branch offices.

There are over 700 social security district offices and branch offices located in the principal cities and other urban areas or towns of the United States. In addition, there are over 3,300 contact stations, located in population and trading centers, which are visited on a regularly, recurring, preannounced basis. A schedule of these visits can be obtained from the nearest district office or branch office. The address of the nearest district office or branch office can be obtained from the local telephone directory or from the post office. Each district office and branch office has a list of all district offices and branch offices throughout the country and their addresses. The principal officer in each district office is the manager. The principal officer in each branch office is the officer-in-charge. Each district office and branch office also has a list of field offices of the Bureau of Hearings and Appeals and their addresses. The administrative hearing examiner is the principal officer in each field office. For procedures relating to claims see § 422.130, subpart J of part 404 of this chapter, and § 404.1520 of this chapter (the latter relating to disability determinations). For procedures on request for hearing by an Administrative Law Judge and review by the Appeals Council see subpart C of this part 422.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

DAY ELEV

 1,900.96

 1,900.84

 1,900.96

 1,901.74

 1,901.34

 1,901.39

 1,901.59

 1,900.74

 1,900.52

 1,901.23

 1,900.70

 1,901.04

 1,900.81

 1,901.32

 1,901.25

 1,901.90

 1,901.54

 1,901.06

 1,900.62

 1,901.67

 1,901.80

 1,901.56

 1,901.31

 1,901.76

 1,901.72

 1,901.69

 1,901.52

 1,900.98

 1,901.11

 1,901.33

 13,882

 13,793

 13,882

 14,465

 14,165

 14,203

 14,352

 13,720

 13,558

 14,083

 13,690

 13,941

 13,771

 14,150

 14,098

 14,584

 14,315

 13,956

 13,631

 14,412

 14,509

 14,330

 14,143

 14,479

 14,450

 14,427

 14,300

 13,896

 13,993

 14,158

STORAGE

-463

-89

+89

+583

-300

+38

+149

-632

-162

+525

-393

+251

-170

+379

-52

+486

-269

-359

-325

+781

+97

-179

-187

+336

-29

-23

-127

-404

+97

+165

CHANGE

1,405

1,236

1,300

1,429

1,104

1,256

1,160

1,082

1,251

1,719

1,114

1,641

1,292

864

720

1,476

3,370

3,448

3,424

4,088

3,791

3,332

1,505

1,735

798

1,130

1,174

589

1,267

1,238

INFLOW

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

POWER

 801

 796

 798

 806

 813

 807

 810

 809

 797

 805

 800

 799

 539

 320

 296

 847

 3,047

 3,282

 3,280

 3,284

 3,310

 2,802

 1,189

 361

 325

 343

 341

 341

 337

 340

SPILL

 155

 155

 155

 155

 155

 155

 155

 155

 155

 155

 155

 155

 155

 155

 155

 155

 155

 155

 155

 155

 155

 155

 155

 155

 155

 155

 155

 155

 155

 155

OUTLETS

 4

 7

 7

 7

 7

 5

 7

 7

 5

 5

 3

 7

 6

 5

 5

 6

 6

 5

 2

 4

 3

 6

 4

 5

 0

 2

 2

 4

 1

 3

C.F.S.

 .19

 .31

 .32

 .32

 .31

 .24

 .30

 .30

 .24

 .21

 .14

 .30

 .27

 .23

 .25

 .26

 .26

 .21

 .10

 .19

 .12

 .29

 .17

 .21

 .00

 .11

 .10

 .17

 .06

 .14

INCHES

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

SEPTEMBER 2014 LEWISTON LAKE DAILY OPERATIONS RUN DATE: October 1, 2014

IN LAKE

EVAPORATION

C.F.S. FRANCIS CARR

COMPUTED*

ACRE-FEET

RELEASE - C.F.S. 

TOTALS -187 50,938 0 4,650 34,225 140 6.32

ACRE-FEET -187 101,036 0 9,223 67,885 278

* COMPUTED INFLOW IS THE SUM OF CHANGE IN STORAGE, RELEASES AND EVAPORATION.

(1) OUTLET RELEASE INCLUDES FISH RELEASE.

SUMMARY

RELEASE (ACRE-FEET)

TOTAL POWER 0

TOTAL RIVER 77,108 100,946

 14,345

 23,838

RIVER

JUDGE FRANCIS CARR POWERPLANT

TOTAL RELEASE

JUDGE (2)

(1) POWERPLANT

 678

 323

 295

 167

 280

 270

 113

 430

 376

 489

 354

 553

 678

 193

 290

 223

 298

 187

 151

 251

 274

 459

 251

 1,045

 333

 642

 740

 293

 725

 657

 12,018

 23,838
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

DAY HIGH

 236

 238

 240

 234

 231

 230

 231

 233

 235

 233

 232

 231

 232

 235

 236

 245

 239

 229

 234

 214

 206

 195

 196

 194

 201

 199

 202

 201

 209

 188

 163

 179

 163

 159

 168

 177

 182

 185

 187

 176

 160

 185

 191

 192

 191

 190

 174

 159

 154

 142

 130

 127

 117

 116

 119

 117

 117

 115

 119

 105

 219

 222

 216

 211

 209

 214

 219

 222

 220

 211

 210

 214

 219

 222

 219

 224

 214

 207

 204

 185

 176

 166

 164

 161

 156

 157

 155

 154

 153

 139

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

JUNE 2007 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: July 9, 2007

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

SAN ANDREAS ON THE SAN JOAQUIN RIVER
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

DAY HIGH

 347

 393

 388

 513

 409

 387

 344

 282

 259

 238

 242

 276

 287

 307

 275

 330

 364

 365

 324

 491

 321

 296

 284

 283

 298

 327

 372

 402

 332

 441

 172

 172

 171

 169

 176

 164

 179

 173

 174

 163

 164

 180

 195

 178

 177

 180

 187

 190

 188

 197

 217

 201

 205

 198

 206

 206

 197

 208

 204

 225

 234

 243

 250

 277

 266

 257

 258

 239

 224

 203

 205

 216

 235

 233

 232

 237

 254

 248

 246

 284

 277

 262

 253

 248

 252

 252

 261

 279

 262

 279

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

NOVEMBER 2009 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: December 2, 2009

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

SAN ANDREAS ON THE SAN JOAQUIN RIVER
[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 78 (Friday, April 22, 2011)]
[Notices]
[Page 22717]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2011-9815]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism; Notice of 
Closed Meeting

    Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended (5 U.S.C. App.), notice is hereby given of the following 
meeting.
    The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the 
provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 
U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could 
disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as 
patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals 
associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would 
constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

    Name of Committee: National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and 
Alcoholism Special Emphasis Panel.
    Date: May 25-26, 2011.
    Time: 8 a.m. to 7 p.m.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate grant applications.
    Place: Legacy Hotel and Meeting Center, 1775 Rockville Pike, 
Rockville, MD 20852.
    Contact Person: Ranga Srinivas, PhD, Chief, Extramural Project 
Review Branch, EPRB, NIAAA, National Institutes of Health, 5365 
Fishers Lane, Room 2085, Rockville, MD 20852, (301) 451-2067, 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#5b28293235322d3a291b363a323775353233753c342d"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="7f0c0d161116091e0d3f121e16135111161751181009">[email protected]</span></a>.

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.271, 
Alcohol Research Career Development Awards for Scientists and 
Clinicians; 93.272, Alcohol National Research Service Awards for 
Research Training; 93.273, Alcohol Research Programs; 93.891, 
Alcohol Research Center Grants; 93.701, ARRA Related Biomedical 
Research and Research Support Awards., National Institutes of 
Health, HHS)

    Dated: April 14, 2011.
Jennifer S. Spaeth,
Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. 2011-9815 Filed 4-21-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
### Part A—Establishment of System
Very truly yours,/s/ MOELIS & COMPANY LLCMOELIS & COMPANY LLC
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAY-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               AUG-31-1997
<CASH>                                      15,219,673
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                               12,578,555
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                  8,718,715
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            37,653,350
<PP&E>                                       9,164,224
<DEPRECIATION>                               3,889,330
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              57,671,483
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        5,568,552
<BONDS>                                     10,444,607
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       808,248
<OTHER-SE>                                  40,201,291
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                57,671,483
<SALES>                                      9,273,479
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             9,273,479
<CGS>                                        3,847,381
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                3,847,381
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             4,422,278
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             166,615
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              1,026,903
<INCOME-TAX>                                   469,248
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            557,655
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   557,655
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .07
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .07
        

</TABLE>
#### § 404.1003 Employment.

Employment means, generally, any service covered by social security performed by an employee for his or her employer. The rules on who is an employee and who is an employer are contained in §§ 404.1005 through 404.1010. Section 404.1004 states the general rule on the kinds of work covered as employment. Exceptions to the general rule are contained in §§ 404.1012 through 404.1038 which explain the kinds of work excluded from employment. All of these rules apply to current work unless otherwise indicated.

[45 FR 20075, Mar. 27, 1980, as amended at 61 FR 38365, July 24, 1996]
Partner

Profile

Company Profile

Headquarters Location

Hopedale, Massachusetts

Contact:

Cindy Normandin

Vice President 

SmartWay Transport

Partnership Representative

(508) 473-8405

cnormandin@braunsexpress.com

Number of Employees:

Strategy Category:

Fuel Economy

Number of Trailers:

180

Number of Power Units:

92

Braun’s Express

http://www.epa.gov/smartway

Environmental conservation has always been a prominent issue for the 

family of David and Cindy Normandin, owners of Braun’s Express. Braun’s

Express, a carrier that specializes in carpet and flooring, hauls products to

terminals throughout the New England, New York, New Jersey, Eastern

Pennsylvania, Delaware, and Maryland. “We’ve always been an environmentally

conscious family, which has helped us be conscious in the business and help us

decrease our fuel consumption and emissions,” explains Stephen Normandin, son

of David and Cindy. To the Braun’s Express family, joining SmartWay Transport

Partnership in fall of 2003 seemed like the next logical step.

Braun’s Express utilizes electronically controlled shut-down devices in their

short haul trucks, which turns off trucks after five minutes if idling. In addition,

the company just switched to wide-based tires, resulting in increased fuel savings. Through the use of wide-based tires, Braun’s Express has experienced a 3%

fuel savings, in addition to weight savings of 850 pounds. In order to increase

aerodynamics and increase fuel efficiency, Braun’s Express utilizes air foil tops

and the road trucks are equipped with aerodynamic bumpers. Braun’s Express

has saved approximately $40,000 through the use of aerodynamics. Mileage is

improved with speed management tools and automatic tire inflation devices.

Through speed management strategies, Braun's has saved approximately $8,000

in fuel. In the future, the company hopes to implement side shields and,

additionally, install APUs on 30 of their road trucks.

In addition, Stephen Normandin states that Braun’s Express is “trying to be as

responsible as possible,” while also trying to promote the program to others.

Braun’s Express cites bringing the environmental issues to the companies as one

of SmartWay’s strong points. According to Cindy Normandin, “SmartWay helps

keep emissions reduction and increasing fuel efficiency on your mind.” Through

their partnership with

SmartWay, Braun’s

Express has benefited

from various marketing

advantages and

SmartWay provided 

information on 

technologies.

Fuel Economy 

EPA420-F-07-003
###### Editorial Note on Part 416

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 416 appear at 68 FR 53509, Sept. 11, 2003.

#### § 416.1205 Limitation on resources.

(a) *Individual with no eligible spouse.* An aged, blind, or disabled individual with no spouse is eligible for benefits under title XVI of the Act if his or her nonexcludable resources do not exceed $1,500 prior to January 1, 1985, and all other eligibility requirements are met. An individual who is living with an ineligible spouse is eligible for benefits under title XVI of the Act if his or her nonexcludable resources, including the resources of the spouse, do not exceed $2,250 prior to January 1, 1985, and all other eligibility requirements are met.

(b) *Individual with an eligible spouse.* An aged, blind, or disabled individual who has an eligible spouse is eligible for benefits under title XVI of the Act if their nonexcludable resources do not exceed $2,250 prior to January 1, 1985, and all other eligibility requirements are met.

(c) *Effective January 1, 1985 and later.* The resources limits and effective dates for January 1, 1985 and later are as follows:

| Effective date | Individual | Individual and spouse |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Jan. 1, 1985 | $1,600 | $2,400 |
| Jan. 1, 1986 | 1,700 | $2,550 |
| Jan. 1, 1987 | 1,800 | $2,700 |
| Jan. 1, 1988 | 1,900 | $2,850 |
| Jan. 1, 1989 | 2,000 | $3,000 |

[50 FR 38982, Sept. 26, 1985]
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY HIGH

 327

 323

 300

 299

 300

 306

 320

 337

 353

 371

 353

 355

 405

 360

 369

 338

 323

 341

 4,737

 2,456

 657

 1,682

 642

 393

 331

 293

 268

 248

 253

 250

 249

 282

 283

 280

 286

 291

 291

 287

 287

 286

 288

 287

 290

 282

 273

 297

 307

 309

 306

 323

 344

 333

 362

 343

 312

 287

 259

 221

 215

 213

 220

 222

 297

 293

 291

 293

 295

 296

 296

 296

 299

 301

 302

 307

 313

 304

 323

 323

 316

 317

 1,053

 818

 414

 694

 447

 346

 301

 276

 245

 233

 232

 234

 234

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

MARCH 2005 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: April 26, 2005

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

PITTSBURG BOTTOM ON THE SACRAMENTO RIVER
### UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION FEDERAL AVIATION ADMINISTRATION WASHINGTON, D.C
.

IN THE MATTER OF COMPLIANCE WITH FEDERAL OBLIGATIONS BY THE CITY OF DALLAS, TEXAS (RESPONDENT) 

### Docket No. 16-15-10

NOTICE OF E XTENSION OF TIME T O RESPOND TO THE FED E RAL ADMINISTRATION NOTICE OF INVESTIGATION
On October 7 , 20 1 5, Respondent , City of Dallas, moved pursuan t to 14 C FR 

### §§ 16.11 and 16.19( e), for an extension of time to respond to the Notice of Investigation (NO I) issued by the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) on August 7 , 2015 and related to Delta Airlines' request for accommodation at Love Field. Respondent seeks until the 60th day following a decision by United States District Court Judge Kink.eade on the Motion of Defendants US. Department o.fTransportation and Federal Aviation Administration to Dismiss or Transfer and for a Stay, currently pending in 

### City of Dallas v. Delta Airlines , Inc
. eta!, Civil Action No. 3: 15

- cv - 0206 7 9
. Respondent's response to the NOI was or iginally due on September 8 , 2015
. On August 1 3, 2015 , FAA agreed to extend this deadline to November 2, 2015
. Upon consideration of this motion, FAA grants an extension oftime for three (3) weeks up and until November 23 , 2015.

Randall S
. Fiertz Director, Office of Airport Compliance and Management Analysis 

# M.**,** 

## 2o1r Date

### CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
I HEREBY CERTIFY that on October&, 2015, I placed in the United States mail (first class, postage paid), a true copy ofthe Notice ofExtension ofTime addressed to: 

### Respondent W. Eric Pilsk Kaplan Kirsch & Rockwell LLP Counsel to the Respondent 1001 Connecticut A venue Suite 800 Washington, DC 20036 Mark Duebner Director ofAviation City of Dallas 8008 Herb Kelleher Way, LB 16 Dallas, TX 75235 Copy to: FAA Part 16 Airport Proceedings Docket Office of Airport Compliance and Management Analysis , AC0-1 00 

# Oi!OYL 

# ll

_ t

_ _ Claudia Roberts Office of Airport Compliance and Management Analysis
# Third District Court of Appeal

State of Florida

Opinion filed March 28, 2018.

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.

________________

No. 3D18-373

Lower Tribunal No. 17-21313

________________



### Emerson Perozo

, Petitioner,

vs.



### The State of Florida

, Respondent.

A Case of Original Jurisdiction

– Mandamus.

Carlos J. Martinez, Public Defender, and Jeffrey Paul DeSousa, Assistant

Public Defender

, for petitioner.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, and Magaly Rodriguez, Assistant

Attorney General

, for respondent.

Before ROTHENBERG, C.J., and SALTER and LOGUE, JJ.

ROTHENBERG, C.J.

The petitioner, Emerson Perozo, seeks mandamus relief instructing the trialcourt to accept his written waiver of appearance at any pretrial conference. See

Fla. R. Crim. P. 3.180(a)(3) (“In all prosecutions for crime the defendant shall be

present

. . . at any pretrial conference, unless waived by the defendant in

writing[.]”); 3.220( o )(1) (“The trial court may hold 1 or more pretrial conferences,

with trial counsel present, to consider such matters as will promote a fair and

expeditious trial. The defendant shall be present unless the defendant waives this in

writing.”). Because no good cause has been shown to override the defendant’s

waiver, we grant the petition for writ of mandamus and instruct the trial court to

accept the petitioner’s written waiver of appearance. See Charlemagne v. Guevara

,

183 So. 3d 1261, 1263 (Fla. 3d DCA 2016) (“[I]f there is a good reason to do so, a

trial court may require the presence of the defendant in court even when the

defendant has filed a written waiver [of appearance at pretrial conferences].”)

(citing Cruz v. State

, 822 So. 2d 595 (Fla. 3d DCA 2002)).

Petition granted; writ of mandamus issued.

2
```

[Congressional Bills 114th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 4150 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

114th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 4150

   To amend title 38, United States Code, to allow the Secretary of 
 Veterans Affairs to modify the hours of employment of physicians and 
physician assistants employed on a full-time basis by the Department of 
                           Veterans Affairs.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            December 1, 2015

Mr. Ruiz (for himself and Mr. Wenstrup) introduced the following bill; 
        which was referred to the Committee on Veterans' Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
   To amend title 38, United States Code, to allow the Secretary of 
 Veterans Affairs to modify the hours of employment of physicians and 
physician assistants employed on a full-time basis by the Department of 
                           Veterans Affairs.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Department of Veterans Affairs 
Emergency Medical Staffing Recruitment and Retention Act''.

SEC. 2. MODIFICATION OF HOURS OF EMPLOYMENT FOR PHYSICIANS AND 
              PHYSICIAN ASSISTANTS EMPLOYED BY THE DEPARTMENT OF 
              VETERANS AFFAIRS.

    Section 7423(a) of title 38, United States Code, is amended--
            (1) by striking ``(a) The hours'' and inserting ``(a)(1) 
        Except as provided in paragraph (2), the hours''; and
            (2) by adding at the end the following new paragraph:
    ``(2) The Secretary may modify the hours of employment for a 
physician or physician assistant appointed in the Administration under 
any provision of this chapter on a full-time basis to be more than or 
less than 80 hours in a biweekly pay period if the total hours of 
employment for such employee in a calendar year does not exceed 2,080 
hours.''.
                                 <all>
```
#### § 418.2260 What major life-changing event evidence will we not accept?

We will follow the rules in § 418.1260, except that any references in that section to regulations in subpart B of this part shall be treated as references to the corresponding regulation in this subpart.
# C_2012302EN.01001201.xml

| 6.10.2012 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 302/12 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

6.10.2012

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 302/12

---

Information communicated by Member States regarding closure of fisheries

2012/C 302/06

In accordance with Article 35(3) of Council Regulation (EC) No 1224/2009 of 20 November 2009 establishing a Community control system for ensuring compliance with the rules of the common fisheries policy (1), a decision has been taken to close the fishery as set down in the following table:

1

| Date and time of closure | 17.8.2012 |
| --- | --- |
| Duration | 17.8.2012-31.12.2012 |
| Member State | Estonia |
| Stock or group of stocks | RED/N3M |
| Species | Redfish (Sebastes spp.) |
| Zone | NAFO 3M |
| Type(s) of fishing vessels | — |
| Reference number | FS51TQ44 |

Date and time of closure

17.8.2012

Duration

17.8.2012-31.12.2012

Member State

Estonia

Stock or group of stocks

RED/N3M

Species

Redfish (Sebastes spp.)

Sebastes

Zone

NAFO 3M

Type(s) of fishing vessels

—

Reference number

FS51TQ44

---

(1)  OJ L 343, 22.12.2009, p. 1.

1

---
#### Barnett Kadin, Appellant, v. J. Rich Steers, Inc., Respondent.

No opinion. Present — Close, P. J., Hagarty, Carswell, Taylor and Lewis, JJ.