alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
II 

114TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 3957 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

SEPTEMBER 22, 2016 

Received 

AN ACT 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to temporarily 

allow expensing of certain costs of replanting citrus 

plants lost by reason of casualty. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 


asabaliauskas on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

HR 3957 RDS 

1 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

2 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Emergency Citrus Dis3 ease Response Act of 2016’’. 

4 SEC. 2. EXPENSING OF CERTAIN COSTS OF REPLANTING 

5 CITRUS PLANTS LOST BY REASON OF CAS6 UALTY. 

7 (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 263A(d)(2) of the Inter8 nal Revenue Code of 1986 is amended by adding at the 

9 end the following new subparagraph: 

10 ‘‘(C) SPECIAL TEMPORARY RULE FOR CIT11 RUS PLANTS LOST BY REASON OF CASUALTY.— 

12 ‘‘(i) IN GENERAL.—In the case of the 

13 replanting of citrus plants, subparagraph 

14 (A) shall apply to amounts paid or in15 curred by a person (other than the tax16 payer described in subparagraph (A)) if— 

17 ‘‘(I) the taxpayer described in 

18 subparagraph (A) has an equity inter19 est of not less than 50 percent in the 

20 replanted citrus plants at all times 

21 during the taxable year in which such 

22 amounts were paid or incurred and 

23 such other person holds any part of 

24 the remaining equity interest; or 

25 ‘‘(II) such other person acquired 

26 the entirety of such taxpayer’s equity 


asabaliauskas on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
3 

HR 3957 RDS 

1 interest in the land on which the lost 

2 or damaged citrus plants were located 

3 at the time of such loss or damage, 

4 and the replanting is on such land. 

5 ‘‘(ii) TERMINATION.—Clause (i) shall 

6 not apply to any cost paid or incurred 

7 after December 31, 2025.’’. 

8 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

9 this section shall apply to costs paid or incurred after the 

10 date of the enactment of this Act. 

Passed the House of Representatives September 21, 

2016. 

Attest: KAREN L. HAAS, 

Clerk. 


asabaliauskas on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
§ 404.2010 When payment will be made to a representative payee. ( a ) We pay benefits to a representative payee on behalf of a beneficiary 18 years old or older when it appears to us that this method of payment will be in the interest of the beneficiary. We do this if we have information that the beneficiary is— ( 1 ) Legally incompetent or mentally incapable of managing benefit payments; or
( 2 ) Physically incapable of managing or directing the management of his or her benefit payments.
( b ) Generally, if a beneficiary is under age 18, we will pay benefits to a representative payee. However, in certain situations, we will make direct payments to a beneficiary under age 18 who shows the ability to manage the benefits. For example, we make direct payments to a beneficiary under age 18 if the beneficiary is— ( 1 ) Receiving disability insurance benefits on his or her own Social Security earnings record; or
( 2 ) Serving in the military services; or
( 3 ) Living alone and supporting himself or herself; or
( 4 ) A parent and files for himself or herself and/or his or her child and he or she has experience in handling his or her own finances; or
( 5 ) Capable of using the benefits to provide for his or her current needs and no qualified payee is available; or
( 6 ) Within 7 months of attaining age 18 and is initially filing an application for benefits.
[47 FR 30472, July 14, 1982, as amended at 54 FR 35483, Aug. 28, 1989]
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR. R. 47.5.4. 

### IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 07-41078 Conference Calendar UNITED STATES OF AMERICA Plaintiff-Appellee v. OSCAR BANOS AGUILAR Defendant-Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas USDC No. 4:07-CR-42-38 Before DAVIS, WIENER, and PRADO, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: * The attorney appointed to represent Oscar Banos Aguilar has moved for leave to withdrawand has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Banos Aguilar has filed a response. Our independent review of the record, counsel’s brief, and Aguilar’s response discloses no nonfrivolous issue for appeal. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit 

### F I L E D December 10, 2008 Charles R. Fulbruge III ClerkNo. 07-41078

2 withdrawis GRANTED, counsel isexcused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5 TH C IR. R. 42.2.
492 P.2d 1259

#### BUDDY TAYLOR AND ARTHUR TAYLOR, a common law partnership, and George Bradford, Petitioners, v. Marie Neer CAMPBELL, Executrix of the Last Will and Testament of John W. Campbell, Deceased, Respondent.

No. 9396.

Supreme Court of New Mexico.

Jan. 18, 1972.

Further ordered that the record in Court of Appeals Cause No. 700, 83 N.M. 438, 492 P.2d 1301, be and the same is hereby returned to the Clerk of the Court of Appeals.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY HIGH

 16,020

 14,387

 21,272

 19,786

 25,270

 22,676

 18,206

 19,465

 0

 10,777

 10,636

 13,957

 14,338

 12,419

 10,809

 8,435

 8,561

 18,858

 19,390

 19,389

 19,837

 20,584

 21,352

 20,194

 20,190

 17,970

 16,700

 13,388

 11,354

 10,712

 13,442

 4,900

 5,355

 5,985

 5,297

 6,823

 7,365

 6,312

 7,167

 0

 6,366

 7,112

 6,122

 7,371

 5,933

 4,728

 3,782

 3,485

 6,747

 6,399

 6,338

 6,451

 6,946

 7,326

 8,067

 7,590

 7,994

 7,281

 6,024

 4,305

 2,618

 2,824

 10,265

 10,107

 10,053

 11,097

 14,329

 11,341

 11,648

 14,304

 0

 8,723

 9,117

 10,023

 10,320

 8,963

 7,016

 5,859

 5,238

 10,710

 11,860

 12,404

 12,720

 13,082

 13,935

 14,333

 13,524

 12,548

 11,822

 9,813

 7,749

 6,196

 6,622

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

JANUARY 2001 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: February 8, 2001

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

PORT CHICAGO TOP IN SUISUN BAY
Exhibit
32.1




CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO




18 U.S.C.
SECTION 1350,




AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO




SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




Each of
the undersigned hereby certifies, in his capacity as an officer of Sino Gas
International Holdings, Inc. (the “Company”), for the purposes of 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that to the best of his knowledge:




(1)
 The Annual Report of the
Company on Form 10-K (amendment no. 2) for the fiscal year ended December 31,
2009 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




(2)
 The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.




Date:
February 7, 2011




/s/
      Yuchuan LiuYuchuan
      LiuChief
      Executive Officer(Principal
      Executive Officer)/s/
      Yugang ZhangYugang
      ZhangChief
      Financial Officer(Principal
      Accounting Officer)
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY HIGH

 3,125

 3,093

 2,860

 3,010

 2,740

 2,501

 2,443

 2,365

 2,292

 2,015

 2,254

 2,293

 2,503

 2,933

 3,083

 2,776

 2,757

 3,147

 2,896

 2,521

 2,543

 2,766

 2,810

 2,878

 3,488

 3,716

 4,435

 5,054

 6,171

 4,654

 3,209

 1,032

 1,024

 1,074

 1,106

 1,083

 1,088

 1,099

 1,098

 1,070

 1,006

 956

 949

 933

 938

 966

 973

 942

 898

 913

 877

 916

 960

 966

 973

 1,014

 1,029

 1,082

 1,118

 1,207

 1,351

 1,005

 1,549

 1,543

 1,587

 1,571

 1,542

 1,481

 1,505

 1,511

 1,440

 1,303

 1,315

 1,298

 1,375

 1,477

 1,619

 1,534

 1,519

 1,581

 1,470

 1,350

 1,409

 1,557

 1,540

 1,548

 1,653

 1,795

 1,948

 2,248

 2,841

 2,400

 1,870

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

OCTOBER 2003 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: November 10, 2003

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

14 DAY

ACCUM

MEAN

14 DAY

AVG

MEAN

 16,468

 17,261

 18,081

 18,831

 19,405

 19,828

 20,134

 20,321

 20,504

 20,566

 20,557

 20,500

 20,462

 20,497

 20,567

 20,558

 20,490

 20,500

 20,428

 20,297

 20,201

 20,247

 20,347

 20,592

 20,930

 21,427

 22,000

 22,771

 23,993

 24,859

 25,210

 1,176

 1,233

 1,292

 1,345

 1,386

 1,416

 1,438

 1,452

 1,465

 1,469

 1,468

 1,464

 1,462

 1,464

 1,469

 1,468

 1,464

 1,464

 1,459

 1,450

 1,443

 1,446

 1,453

 1,471

 1,495

 1,531

 1,571

 1,627

 1,714

 1,776

 1,801

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

JERSEY POINT TOP ON THE SAN JOAQUIN RIVER
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-28-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JUN-30-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-21-1996
<CASH>                                       6,808,000
<SECURITIES>                                 8,212,000
<RECEIVABLES>                                3,551,000
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                  2,022,000
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            13,153,000
<PP&E>                                      10,064,000
<DEPRECIATION>                               4,900,000
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              26,658,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        2,185,000
<BONDS>                                      2,110,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       141,000
<OTHER-SE>                                  22,222,000
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                22,363,000
<SALES>                                      2,809,000
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             2,809,000
<CGS>                                        2,565,000
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                2,565,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               812,000
<LOSS-PROVISION>                             (568,000)
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             177,000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (391,000)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          (391,000)
<DISCONTINUED>                                  90,000
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (301,000)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.02)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
_________________________________________ 

 

 

Order Michigan Supreme Court 

Lansing, Michigan 

October 31, 2005 Clifford W. Taylor,

 Chief Justice 

Michael F. Cavanagh 

Elizabeth A. Weaver 129097 

Marilyn Kelly 

Maura D. Corrigan 

Robert P. Young, Jr. 

Stephen J. Markman, PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Justices 

Plaintiff-Appellee, 

v SC: 129097 

 COA: 259199 

Monroe CC: 96-027383-FC 

LUIS ANGEL PESQUERA, 

Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/ 

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the June 24, 2005 order 

of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because the defendant has 

failed to meet the burden of establishing entitlement to relief under MCR 6.508(D). 

d1024 

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

October 31, 2005 

Clerk
#### § 225.57 Requesting a recomputation.

An annuitant who meets the conditions for a recomputation may request that his or her PIA be recomputed sooner than it would be recomputed automatically. Providing inclusion of the additional earnings increases the PIA, the Board will recompute the PIA from the earliest permissible date as described in this part.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

DAY HIGH

 888

 888

 769

 672

 640

 582

 771

 835

 854

 683

 845

 957

 1,026

 855

 802

 779

 683

 653

 671

 688

 664

 695

 808

 746

 755

 657

 696

 663

 561

 574

 225

 241

 228

 237

 247

 236

 222

 215

 225

 203

 211

 208

 207

 212

 213

 224

 216

 218

 216

 202

 189

 177

 176

 174

 169

 169

 165

 166

 164

 169

 442

 457

 424

 405

 396

 386

 379

 429

 468

 401

 390

 454

 445

 399

 399

 397

 371

 386

 391

 388

 369

 359

 379

 393

 341

 352

 357

 331

 307

 309

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

SEPTEMBER 2001 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: October 23, 2001

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

SAN ANDREAS ON THE SAN JOAQUIN RIVER
§ 404.540 Will you receive notice of our intention to apply cross-program recovery? Before we collect an overpayment from you using cross-program recovery, we will send you a written notice that tells you the following information: ( a ) We have determined that you owe a specific overpayment balance that can be collected by cross-program recovery;
( b ) We will withhold a specific amount from the title VIII or title XVI benefits (see § 404.535);
( c ) You may ask us to review this determination that you still owe this overpayment balance;
( d ) You may request that we withhold a different amount from your current monthly benefits (the notice will not include this information if § 404.535(d) applies); and
( e ) You may ask us to waive collection of this overpayment balance.
[70 FR 15, Jan. 3, 2005]
Editorial Note on Part 416
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 416 appear at 68 FR 53509, Sept. 11, 2003.

§ 416.262 Eligibility requirements for special SSI cash benefits. You are eligible for special SSI cash benefits if you meet the following requirements— ( a ) You were eligible to receive a regular SSI benefit or a federally administered State supplementary payment (see § 416.2001) in a month before the month for which we are determining your eligibility for special SSI cash benefits as long as that month was not in a prior period of eligibility which has terminated according to §§ 416.1331 through 416.1335;
( b ) In the month for which we are making the determination, your gross earned income exceeds the amount ordinarily considered to represent SGA under § 416.974(b)(2);
( c ) You continue to have a disabling impairment;
( d ) If your disability is based on a determination that drug addiction or alcoholism is a contributing factor material to the determination of disability as described in § 416.935, you have not yet received SSI cash benefits, special SSI cash benefits, or special SSI eligibility status for a total of 36 months, or Social Security benefit payments when treatment was available for a total of 36 months; and
( e ) You meet all the nondisability requirements for eligibility for SSI benefits (see § 416.202).
We will follow the rules in this subpart in determining your eligibility for special SSI cash benefits. [47 FR 15324, Apr. 9, 1982, as amended at 59 FR 41404, Aug. 12, 1994; 60 FR 8149, Feb. 10, 1995; 64 FR 31972, June 15, 1999]
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY HIGH

 89

 89

 88

 85

 81

 83

 87

 87

 87

 89

 94

 88

 101

 106

 91

 94

 94

 92

 94

 92

 89

 86

 91

 96

 95

 71

 67

 67

 68

 69

 70

 83

 82

 82

 82

 78

 78

 80

 83

 81

 82

 83

 84

 85

 89

 87

 88

 86

 87

 87

 83

 82

 82

 83

 85

 69

 66

 66

 66

 66

 67

 67

 86

 85

 85

 84

 79

 79

 83

 84

 84

 85

 86

 85

 90

 93

 88

 90

 90

 89

 89

 88

 85

 84

 87

 90

 78

 68

 67

 66

 67

 68

 68

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

MARCH 2015 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: April 1, 2015

HIGH LOW MEAN

 57.9

 58.4

 58.7

 58.8

 58.4

 59.0

 60.5

 61.6

 62.9

 62.7

 63.2

 64.0

 65.1

 67.5

 68.0

 66.0

 66.6

 66.1

 66.6

 65.2

 65.4

 66.1

 66.1

 65.1

 63.5

 60.4

 60.5

 60.2

 60.5

 61.0

 61.5

 53.3

 55.0

 54.3

 54.7

 54.1

 54.6

 55.7

 56.7

 57.9

 59.1

 60.5

 59.3

 60.5

 62.7

 64.0

 63.0

 62.7

 61.2

 61.3

 61.7

 60.6

 62.3

 62.4

 61.0

 60.7

 57.5

 57.9

 58.0

 57.8

 58.0

 58.6

 55.6

 56.7

 56.6

 56.8

 56.4

 56.9

 58.1

 59.2

 60.4

 61.0

 61.7

 61.7

 62.8

 65.1

 65.9

 64.5

 64.5

 63.6

 63.9

 63.5

 63.0

 64.0

 63.9

 63.1

 62.0

 59.0

 59.1

 59.1

 59.1

 59.5

 60.0

HIGH LOW MEAN

 10.4

 10.3

 10.4

 10.5

 10.6

 10.5

 10.3

 10.1

 10.0

 9.9

 9.7

 9.8

 9.7

 9.4

 9.2

 9.4

 9.5

 9.5

 9.5

 9.7

 9.8

 9.6

 9.6

 9.8

 9.6

 9.8

 9.9

 9.9

 9.8

 9.7

 9.6

 9.8

 9.7

 9.8

 9.8

 10.0

 9.9

 9.6

 9.5

 9.3

 9.1

 9.0

 9.1

 9.0

 8.6

 8.3

 8.4

 8.5

 8.6

 8.6

 8.6

 8.8

 8.7

 8.7

 8.8

 8.9

 9.6

 9.6

 9.7

 9.6

 9.5

 9.4

 10.1

 10.0

 10.0

 10.1

 10.3

 10.2

 9.9

 9.7

 9.6

 9.5

 9.3

 9.4

 9.3

 8.9

 8.7

 8.8

 8.9

 9.0

 9.0

 9.1

 9.2

 9.1

 9.1

 9.2

 9.3

 9.7

 9.7

 9.8

 9.7

 9.7

 9.5

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

RIPON ON THE STANISLAUS RIVER

 ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS WATER TEMPERATURE, DEG DISSOLVED OXYZEN, PPM
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY HIGH

 120

 123

 119

 121

 120

 121

 119

 118

 119

 118

 115

 113

 113

 116

 111

 113

 113

 109

 109

 108

 105

 104

 106

 107

 107

 107

 110

 108

 111

 112

 110

 93

 90

 100

 105

 107

 98

 99

 99

 93

 99

 98

 92

 92

 89

 93

 99

 95

 94

 96

 94

 90

 86

 90

 89

 96

 98

 93

 95

 98

 99

 98

 110

 108

 112

 115

 115

 115

 113

 112

 110

 110

 109

 105

 106

 104

 105

 107

 105

 105

 105

 102

 101

 100

 98

 100

 101

 103

 103

 103

 106

 107

 107

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

MAY 2006 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: June 2, 2006

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

SAN ANDREAS ON THE SAN JOAQUIN RIVER
[if !vml]>[endif]>

[if !vml]>[endif]>

You have reached the FederalDepository Library Program Electronic Collection (FDLP/EC) Archive. Thisarchive assures ongoing access to publications in the FDLP/EC. Access topublications in the archive is available through GPO's suite of cataloging andlocator services, including the Catalog of U.S. Government Publications(CGP).  Archived copies of publications are retrieved in the event thatpublications are no longer available from the original publishing agency site. 
**Title:****Report on Senior ExecutiveService pay for performance for fiscal year**
 
2005 | 2006 | 2007
 
SuDoc Number:PM 1.75:
Item Number:0295-D-16 (online)
CGP systemNumber:000941171
 
April 19, 2018
### §6063. Study of Goals 2000 and students with disabilities

#### (a) Study required

#### (1) In general

Not later than 180 days after March 31, 1994, the Secretary shall make appropriate arrangements with the National Academy of Sciences or the National Academy of Education to conduct a comprehensive study of the inclusion of children with disabilities in school reform activities assisted under the Goals 2000: Educate America Act [20 U.S.C. 5801 et seq.].

#### (2) "Children with disabilities" defined

For purposes of this section, the term "children with disabilities" has the same meaning given such term in section 1401 of this title.

#### (b) Study components

The study conducted under subsection (a) shall include—

(1) an evaluation of the National Education Goals and objectives, curriculum reforms, standards, and other programs and activities intended to achieve those goals;

(2) a review of the adequacy of assessments and measures used to gauge progress towards meeting National Education Goals and any national and State standards, and an examination of other methods or accommodations necessary or desirable to collect data on the educational progress of children with disabilities, and the costs of such methods and accommodations;

(3) an examination of what incentives or assistance might be provided to States to develop improvement plans that adequately address the needs of children with disabilities;

(4) the relation of the Goals 2000: Educate America Act [20 U.S.C. 5801 et seq.] to other Federal laws governing or affecting the education of children with disabilities; and

(5) such other issues as the National Academy of Sciences or the National Academy of Education considers appropriate.

#### (c) Study panel membership

Any panel constituted in furtherance of the study to be conducted under subsection (a) shall include consumer representatives.

#### (d) Findings and recommendations

The Secretary shall request the National Academy of Sciences or the National Academy of Education to submit an interim report of its findings and recommendations to the President and Congress not later than 12 months, and a final report not later than 24 months, from the date of the completion of procurement relating to the study.

#### (e) Funding

From funds appropriated to the Secretary for research related to individuals with disabilities the Secretary shall make available $600,000 for fiscal year 1994, and such sums as may be necessary for fiscal year 1995, to carry out this section. Amounts made available under this subsection shall remain available until expended.

(Pub. L. 103–227, title X, §1015, Mar. 31, 1994, 108 Stat. 266.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

The Goals 2000: Educate America Act, referred to in subsecs. (a)(1) and (b)(4), is Pub. L. 103–227, Mar. 31, 1994, 108 Stat. 125 (except titles V and IX), which is classified principally to this chapter (except subchapters V (§5931 et seq.) and IX (§6001 et seq.)). For complete classification of this Act to the Code, see Short Title note set out under section 5801 of this title and Tables.
THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS

13-23-00500-CV

South Texas Independent School District

v.

Ryan Busse, Josh Klostermann, Russel Klostermann, Layne Klostermann, Mitch 

Thomas, Olivia Rincones, Robert Rincones, Ruben Rincones, Enrica Rincones, 

Angelita Garcia, Adelaida Garcia, Aniceto Garcia, Betty Garcia, Railey Rincones, Gary 

Busse, Alison Savage, and Lyford Consolidated Independent School District

On Appeal from the

197th District Court of Willacy County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 2023-CV-0282-A

JUDGMENT

THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS, having considered this cause on 

appeal, concludes the judgment of the trial court should be reversed and rendered. The 

Court orders the judgment of the trial court REVERSED and RENDERS judgment in 

accordance with its opinion. Costs of the appeal are adjudged against appellees.

We further order this decision certified below for observance.

August 1, 2024