alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
### §1383. Transfer of property by President of United States

In respect to property not transferable to the Republic of the Philippines under section 1382 of this title, the President of the United States is authorized, in his discretion and under such terms and conditions as he may deem appropriate, to transfer to the Republic of the Philippines any or all of the right, title, and interest of the Government of the United States or its agencies or instrumentalities to any or all real and personal property vested in such agencies or instrumentalities.

(July 3, 1946, ch. 536, §4, 60 Stat. 419.)

#### **Executive Documents**

#### Ex. Ord. No. 9937. Delegation of President's Authority to Agencies Participating in the Philippine Recovery Program

Ex. Ord. No. 9937, Mar. 20, 1948, 13 F.R. 1503 as amended by act June 30, 1949, ch. 288, title I, §103(a), 63 Stat. 380; 1949 Reorg. Plan No. 7, §2, eff. Aug. 19, 1949, 14 F.R. 5228, 63 Stat. 1070; 1950 Reorg. Plan No. 21, eff. May 24, 1950, 15 F.R. 3178, 64 Stat. 1273, provided:

By virtue of the authority vested in me by the Constitution and the statutes, and as President of the United States, it is hereby ordered as follows:

The Commissioner of Public Roads of the Department of Commerce, the Chief of Engineers of the United States Army, the Philippine War Damage Commission, the Surgeon General of the Public Health Service of the Federal Security Agency [now the Department of Health and Human Services], the Maritime Administration, the Director of the Fish and Wildlife Service [now the United States Fish and Wildlife Service] of the Department of the Interior, and the Administrator of Civil Aeronautics, the Chief of the Weather Bureau [now the National Weather Service], and the Director of the Coast and Geodetic Survey [now the National Ocean Survey] of the Department of Commerce are hereby authorized, as to their respective agencies, to exercise the authority vested in the President by section 4 of the Philippine Property Act of 1946 (60 Stat. 419) [this section]: Provided, that this authority shall be exercised only with respect to property located in the Philippines in the possession and control of the respective agencies and utilized in carrying out the provisions of Title III of the Philippine Rehabilitation Act of 1946 (60 Stat. 135) [sections 1781 to 1789 of the former Appendix to Title 50, War and National Defense].
§ 404.1519g Who we will select to perform a consultative examination. ( a ) We will purchase a consultative examination only from a qualified medical source. The medical source may be your own medical source or another medical source. If you are a child, the medical source we choose may be a pediatrician.
( b ) By “qualified,” we mean that the medical source must be currently licensed in the State and have the training and experience to perform the type of examination or test we will request; the medical source must not be barred from participation in our programs under the provisions of § 404.1503a. The medical source must also have the equipment required to provide an adequate assessment and record of the existence and level of severity of your alleged impairments.
( c ) The medical source we choose may use support staff to help perform the consultative examination. Any such support staff (e.g., X-ray technician, nurse) must meet appropriate licensing or certification requirements of the State. See § 404.1503a.
[56 FR 36957, Aug. 1, 1991, as amended at 65 FR 11876, Mar. 7, 2000; 82 FR 5866, Jan. 18, 2017]
#### Hugh L. Fox and Others v. Frederick F. Proctor.

Motion denied, with ten dollars costs. Present—Ingraham, P. J., McLaughlin, Laughlin, Clarke and Scott, JJ.
Editorial Note on Part 416
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 416 appear at 68 FR 53509, Sept. 11, 2003.

§ 416.930 Need to follow prescribed treatment. ( a ) *What treatment you must follow.* In order to get benefits, you must follow treatment prescribed by your medical source(s) if this treatment is expected to restore your ability to work.
( b ) *When you do not follow prescribed treatment.* If you do not follow the prescribed treatment without a good reason, we will not find you disabled or blind or, if you are already receiving benefits, we will stop paying you benefits.
( c ) *Acceptable reasons for failure to follow prescribed treatment.* We will consider your physical, mental, educational, and linguistic limitations (including any lack of facility with the English language) when determining if you have an acceptable reason for failure to follow prescribed treatment. The following are examples of a good reason for not following treatment: ( 1 ) The specific medical treatment is contrary to the established teaching and tenets of your religion.
( 2 ) The prescribed treatment would be cataract surgery for one eye when there is an impairment of the other eye resulting in a severe loss of vision and is not subject to improvement through treatment.
( 3 ) Surgery was previously performed with unsuccessful results and the same surgery is again being recommended for the same impairment.
( 4 ) The treatment because of its enormity (e.g., open heart surgery), unusual nature (e.g., organ transplant), or other reason is very risky for you; or
( 5 ) The treatment involves amputation of an extremity, or a major part of an extremity.
[45 FR 55621, Aug. 20, 1980, as amended at 59 FR 1636, Jan. 12, 1994; 62 FR 6429, Feb. 11, 1997; 82 FR 5882, Jan. 18, 2017]
**EXHIBIT 99.16** 

 

**CONSENT OF MURRAY (GUY) BUTCHER**

United States Securities and Exchange Commission

Gentlemen:

In connection with Silver Wheaton Corporation’s (the “Company”) Annual Report on Form 40-F for the year ended December 31, 2008 (the “Annual Report”), I, Murray (Guy) Butcher, AusIMM, Group Metallurgist (Goldcorp Inc.), hereby consent to the inclusion in, or incorporation by reference into, and the use of my name in connection with the preparation of the following            documents/reports:

 

| 1.     | Resource and reserve estimates of the Peñasquito Mine;                                                                                                                                                  |
|--------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   |                                                                                                                                                                                                           |
| 2.     | Technical report dated March 10, 2009, entitled “Peñasquito Project Technical Report, Concepcion del Oro District, Zacatecas State, Mexico” re-addressed to Silver Wheaton Corporation; and |
|   |                                                                                                                                                                                                           |
| 3.     | The Annual Report.                                                                                                                                                                                             |

 

Date: March 30, 2009

|   | Yours truly,/s/ Murray (Guy) Butcher                                                     |
|--------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   | Name: Murray (Guy) Butcher, AusIMM, Title:   Group Metallurgist, Goldcorp Inc. |
§ 408.803 What happens to your SVB payments if you fail to comply with our request for information? ( a ) *Effective date of suspension.* We will suspend your SVB payments effective with the month following the month in which we determine in accordance with § 408.714(b) that you may no longer receive SVB payments because you failed to comply with our request for necessary information.
( b ) *Resumption of payments.* When we have information to establish that SVB is again payable, your benefit payments will be reinstated for any previous month for which you continue to meet the requirements of § 408.202.
( c ) *When we will not suspend your payments.* We will not suspend your payments for failing to comply with our request for information for any month we can determine your eligibility for or the amount of your payment based on information on record. If we cannot determine your eligibility or the amount of your payment based on the information on record, we will send you a notice of suspension of payment because you failed to comply with our request for information in accordance with §§ 408.820 and 408.1005.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

DAY HIGH

 183

 185

 186

 184

 193

 182

 183

 180

 180

 177

 173

 174

 174

 178

 182

 203

 202

 205

 186

 183

 174

 171

 162

 160

 148

 152

 150

 156

 171

 159

 154

 157

 157

 158

 155

 152

 154

 148

 149

 139

 140

 152

 162

 161

 166

 162

 161

 140

 133

 136

 128

 126

 116

 120

 109

 110

 113

 109

 115

 113

 171

 172

 172

 170

 171

 172

 171

 168

 169

 160

 157

 163

 169

 171

 174

 177

 180

 171

 163

 162

 154

 151

 142

 142

 129

 130

 130

 131

 134

 133

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

JUNE 2000 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: July 12, 2000

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

SAN ANDREAS ON THE SAN JOAQUIN RIVER
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA 

Case No. DA 23-0224 

__________________________________________________________________ 

THOMAS C. WEINER, M.D., 

 Plaintiff and Appellant, 

 v. 

ST. PETER’S HEALTH, a Montana Domestic 

Nonprofit Corporation, d/b/a St. Peter’s Hospital, 

 Defendant and Appellee. 

GRANT OF EXTENSION 

Upon consideration of Appellee’s Unopposed Motion for Extension of 

Time, and good cause appearing therefore, 

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Appellee is granted an extension of time up 

to and including September 13, 2023, within which to prepare, file, and serve 

Appellee’s answer brief. 

Electronically signed by:

Bowen Greenwood

Clerk of the Supreme Court

August 14 2023

08/14/2023

Case Number: DA 23-0224
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

DAY ELEVATION

 238.49

 238.45

 238.48

 238.48

 238.51

 238.50

 238.51

 238.56

 238.91

 240.64

 245.34

 240.89

 239.68

 239.36

 239.14

 238.97

 238.90

 238.83

 238.78

 238.73

 238.71

 238.76

 240.29

 239.17

 238.95

 239.98

 239.61

 239.44

 298

 294

 297

 297

 300

 299

 300

 305

 341

 558

 1,426

 593

 432

 393

 367

 347

 340

 333

 328

 322

 320

 326

 510

 370

 345

 468

 423

 403

STORAGE

-2

-4

+3

+0

+3

-1

+1

+5

+36

+217

+868

-833

-161

-39

-26

-20

-7

-7

-5

-6

-2

+6

+184

-140

-25

+123

-45

-20

CHANGE

 329

 263

 252

 311

 190

 206

 150

 150

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 50

 0

 0

 0

 0

 50

 6,010

 5,970

 6,090

 6,030

 6,010

 6,010

 6,050

 6,280

 11,600

 19,100

 23,000

 11,400

 9,440

 8,210

 7,660

 7,300

 7,140

 6,980

 6,770

 6,710

 6,640

 7,070

 9,480

 7,690

 15,100

 10,000

 9,910

 12,500

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

FEBRUARY 2007 RED BLUFF DIVERSION RESERVOIR DAILY OPERATIONS RUN DATE: March 9, 2007

IN LAKE

CANAL

 ACRE-FEET

TOTALS +103 1,951 252,150

ACRE-FEET +103 3,870 500,140

SUMMARY

RELEASE (ACRE-FEET)

TOTAL 504,208

 300

RELEASE

RIVER

CORNING TO SACTO

CANAL

RELEASE C.F.S.

TEHAMA

COLUSA

 27

 37

 36

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 100

 198

CORNING CANAL 198

TEHAMA-COLUSA CANAL 3,870

TO SACTO RIVER 500,140
-1- 

### STATE OF MICHIGAN

COURT OF APPEALS

In re CHARLES PORTUS.

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Appellee, UNPUBLISHED December 2, 2014

v No. 309197

Oakland Probate Court CHARLES PORTUS, LC No. 1976-017337-MI

Appellant.

Before: G LEICHER , P.J., and S AAD and F ORT H OOD , JJ.

G LEICHER

, J. ( concurring ).

Charles Portus has been institutionalized and in the custody of the Center for Forensic Psychiatry (CFP) for 40 years. The probate court was required to pe riodically review the appropriateness of Mr. Portus’s continued placemen t to ensure that he was not unconstitutionally confined after recovering his mental faculties . Unfortunately, the pr obate court improperly delayed in conducting a single hearing regardi ng one of the prosecutor’s multiple biannual petitions for continuing treatment or involuntary hospitalization. I concur with the lead opinion’s assessment that this error was harmless, because the delay did not hinder Mr. Portus’s release.

When a person is acquitted of criminal charges by reason of insanity, that person is remitted by the court to the care and custody of the CFP. MC L 330.2050(1). That person “shall not be discharged or placed on leave without first being evaluated and recommended for discharge or leave by” the CFP. MCL 330.2050(5) . Certain grounds precl ude the discharge and release of a person acquitted by re ason of insanity, MCL 330.2050(2), (5), including when he or she “[c]an be reasonably expected within the near future to intentionally or unintentionally seriously physically injure himself or hersel f or another person, and has overtly acted in a manner substantially supportive of that expectation.” MCL 330.1515( b). Stated differently, a person may not be released from CFP care and custody if he or she “has enga ged in an act or acts or made significant threats th at are substantially supportive of the expectation.” MCL 330.1401(1)(a).

The CFP conducted a clinical evaluation of Mr. Portus in the midst of these proceedings. During that evaluation, Mr. Portus’s comments reve aled that he remained a danger to others.-2- Mr. Portus described that wh ile on a limited release from th e CFP, he fantasized about kidnapping a child in a store. Mr. Portus further reported that he continue s to have violent sexual fantasies involving children. Mr. Portus’s admissions and his various psychiatric and psychological conditions presented a bleak pictur e, resulting in the CFP’s recommendation that Mr. Portus’s institutionalization be continued. Accordingly, despite the court’s delay in conducting a required hearing, Mr. Po rtus had no statutory or cons titutional right to release.

Moreover, Mr. Portus withdr ew his request for discharge from CFP custody while the lower court proceedings were pending. Therefore, a timely hearing would not have affected a change in Mr. Portus’s position and he can esta blish no prejudice resulti ng from the delay. In my view, no additional analysis is appropriate or required.

/s/ Elizabeth L. Gleicher
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
 WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549
 FORM 8-K/A
 (Amendment No. 1)
 
 CURRENT REPORT
 PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE
SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
 Date of report (Date of earliest event reported): May 4, 2011
 EXPRESS SCRIPTS, INC.
 (Exact Name of Registrant as Specified in its Charter)
 
 DELAWARE
(State or Other Jurisdiction of 
Incorporation or Organization)
    
    0-20199
(Commission File Number)
    
    43-1420563
(I.R.S. Employer
Identification No.)
 One Express Way, St. Louis, MO
(Address of Principal Executive Offices)
    
    63121
(Zip Code)
  
 
 see
 o
 o
 o
 o




---



##### 



EXPLANATORY NOTE
   Item 5.07. Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders.
  2




---



##### 



SIGNATURES
  Express Scripts, Inc.By
    /s/ Keith J. EblingName:
    Keith J. EblingTitle:
    Executive Vice President and General Counsel  3
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK

Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department

198 

KA 13-01463 

PRESENT: SMITH, J.P., PERADOTTO, NEMOYER, CURRAN, AND SCUDDER, JJ. 

 

THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, RESPONDENT, 

V MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

TIMOTHY BOYD, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT. 

 

FRANK H. HISCOCK LEGAL AID SOCIETY, SYRACUSE (PHILIP ROTHSCHILD OF

COUNSEL), FOR DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.

WILLIAM J. FITZPATRICK, DISTRICT ATTORNEY, SYRACUSE (JAMES P. MAXWELL

OF COUNSEL), FOR RESPONDENT. 

 

Appeal from a judgment of the Onondaga County Court (Anthony F.

Aloi, J.), rendered November 26, 2012. The judgment convicted

defendant, upon his plea of guilty, of robbery in the first degree,

burglary in the first degree, burglary in the second degree, criminal

possession of a weapon in the second degree (two counts) and

conspiracy in the fourth degree. 

It is hereby ORDERED that the judgment so appealed from is

unanimously affirmed. 

Memorandum: Defendant appeals from a judgment convicting him

upon his plea of guilty of, inter alia, robbery in the first degree

(Penal Law § 160.15 [4]) and burglary in the first degree (§ 140.30

[4]) in connection with a home invasion during which four men were

engaged in a standoff with police for approximately six hours. 

Defendant failed to move to withdraw his plea or to vacate the

judgment of conviction, and he therefore failed to preserve for our

review his contention that his plea to the indictment was not knowing

and voluntary (see People v Brinson, 130 AD3d 1493, 1493, lv denied 26

NY3d 965). In any event, we conclude that defendant’s contention is

without merit (see id.). 

Entered: March 18, 2016 Frances E. Cafarell

Clerk of the Court
### §§1079e, 1079f. Repealed. Pub. L. 96–465, title II, §2205(13), Oct. 17, 1980, 94 Stat. 2160

Section 1079e, act May 1, 1956, ch. 229, §6, 70 Stat. 125, related to restriction on increases under sections 1079 to 1079f of this title.

Section 1079f, act May 1, 1956, ch. 229, §7, 70 Stat. 125, provided that no annuity currently payable be reduced as a result of sections 1079 to 1079f of this title.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date of Repeal

Repeal effective Feb. 15, 1981, except as otherwise provided, see section 2403 of Pub. L. 96–465, set out as an Effective Date note under section 3901 of this title.
1

In The

Court of Appeals

Ninth District of Texas at Beaumont

____________________

NO. 09-16-00309-CR

____________________

KRISTEN WESTFALL MADDOX, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

_______________________________________________________ ______________

On Appeal from the 1A District Court 

Tyler County, Texas

Trial Cause No. 12,856 

________________________________________________________ _____________

ORDER

Counsel for Kristen Westfall Maddox requested access to the sealed juror 

information filed in this appeal. The State did not file an objection. 

It is, therefore, ORDERED that Scott W. Stover, counsel on appeal for the 

appellant, Kristen Westfall Maddox, be allowed to personally inspect and view the 

sealed exhibits on file in this appeal. Appellate counsel may personally inspect and 

view the sealed record at the Ninth Court of Appeals, Jefferson County Courthouse, 

1001 Pearl Street, Suite 330, Beaumont, Texas, by appointment during the Court’s 
2

regular business hours, or in the 1A District Court of Tyler County, Texas, by 

appointment with the trial court clerk. The trial court and the clerk shall assist the 

Court in ensuring that appellate counsel can personally inspect the sealed record. No 

images or copies may be made of any sealed document.

ORDER ENTERED February 9, 2017.

 PER CURIAM

 

Before McKeithen, C.J., Kreger and Horton, JJ.
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
 WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549
 
 FORM 8-K
 CURRENT REPORT
Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
 Date of Report (Date of earliest event reported): July 14, 2011
 BioMed Realty Trust, Inc.
 BioMed Realty, L.P.
  20-1142292 (BioMed RealtyTrust, Inc.)1-32261 (BioMed Realty Trust, Inc.)
    
    20-1320636 (BioMed Realty,Maryland
    
    000-54089 (BioMed Realty, L.P.)
    
    L.P.)(State or Other
    
    (Commission File No.)
    
    (I.R.S. EmployerJurisdiction of
    
    
    
    Identification No.)Incorporation)
 17190 Bernardo Center Drive
San Diego, California 92128
  
 858) 485-9840
 
  o
    
    Written communications pursuant to Rule 425 under the Securities Act (17 CFR 230.425)o
    
    Soliciting material pursuant to Rule 14a-12 under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.14a-12)o
    
    Pre-commencement communications pursuant to Rule 14d-2(b) under the Exchange Act (17 CFR
240.14d-2(b))o
    
    Pre-commencement communications pursuant to Rule 13e-4(c) under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.13e-4(c))




---



##### 



Item 1.01 Entry Into a Material Agreement.
     Item 1.02 Termination of a Material Definitive Agreement.




---



##### 



Item 2.03 Creation of a Direct Financial Obligation or an Obligation under an Off-Balance Sheet
Arrangement of a Registrant.
  Item 7.01 Regulation FD Disclosure.
  Item 9.01 Financial Statements and Exhibits.
  ExhibitNumber
    
    Description of Exhibit10.1
    
    
    Unsecured Credit Agreement, dated as of July 14, 2011, by and
among BioMed Realty, L.P., KeyBank National Association, as
Administrative Agent, and certain lenders party thereto.10.2
    
    
    Form of Line Note under Unsecured Credit Agreement.10.3
    
    
    Form of Competitive Bid Note under Unsecured Credit Agreement.10.4
    
    
    Form of Swing Loan Note under Unsecured Credit Agreement.99.1
    
    
    Press release issued by BioMed Realty Trust, Inc. on July 19, 2011.




---



##### 



SIGNATURES
  Date: July 19, 2011
    
    BIOMED REALTY TRUST, INC.By:
    
    /s/ GREG N. LUBUSHKINName:
    
    Greg N. LubushkinTitle:
    
    Chief Financial OfficerBIOMED REALTY, L.P.By: BioMed Realty Trust, Inc.its General PartnerBy:
    
    /s/ GREG N. LUBUSHKINName:
    
    Greg N. LubushkinTitle:
    
    Chief Financial Officer