alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 422.815 Referral of administrative debts to the Department of the Treasury. ( a ) Agencies are required by law to transfer delinquent, nontax, and legally enforceable debts to Department of the Treasury (Treasury) for collection through cross-servicing and through centralized Administrative Offset. Additionally, we may transfer debts to the Treasury for collection through Administrative Wage Garnishment. Agencies need not make duplicate referrals to Treasury for all these purposes; we may refer a debt to Treasury for purposes of simultaneous collection by cross-servicing, centralized Administrative Offset, and Administrative Wage Garnishment where applicable. However, in some instances a debt exempt from cross-servicing collection may be subject to collection by centralized Administrative Offset, so simultaneous referrals are not always appropriate.
( b ) When we refer or transfer administrative debts to Treasury, or Treasury-designated debt collection centers under the authority of 31 U.S.C. 3711(g), Treasury will service, collect, or compromise the debts, or Treasury will suspend or terminate the collection action, in accordance with the statutory requirements and authorities applicable to the collection of such debts.
( c ) Debts that are not required for referral include: ( 1 ) Debts delinquent for 120 calendar days or less;
( 2 ) Debts less than $100 and we are unable to obtain the debtor's taxpayer identification number;
( 3 ) Debts in litigation or foreclosure as defined in 31 CFR 285.12(d)(2);
( 4 ) Debts that have been referred to a private collection contractor for a period acceptable to Treasury;
( 5 ) Debts that will be disposed of under an approved asset sale program as defined in 31 CFR 285.12(d)(3)(i);
( 6 ) Debts that will be collected under internal offset procedures within three years after the debt first became delinquent;
( 7 ) Debts at a debt collection center for a period of time acceptable to Treasury; or
( 8 ) Debts exempt from this requirement based on a determination by the Secretary of the Treasury that exemption for a certain class of debt is in the best interest of the United States. Federal agencies may request that the Secretary of the Treasury exempt specific classes of debts. Any such request by an agency must be sent to the Fiscal Assistant Secretary of the Treasury by the agency's Chief Financial Officer.
### SUBCHAPTER IV—ADDITIONAL GENERAL PROVISIONS
Big Creek

Mallard-Larkins

Magee

Selkirk

Beetop

Meadow Creek - Upper North Fork

North Fork

Lost Creek

Graham Coal

Roberts

Salmo/Priest

Mt. Willard-Lake Estelle

Katka Peak

White Mountain

Pinchot Butte

Roland Point

Schafer Peak

Scotchman Peaks

Mosquito Fly Sheep Mountain-State Line

Trestle Peak

Spion Kop

East Cathedral Peak

Tepee Creek

Maple Peak

Hammond Creek

Trout Creek

Upper Priest

Storm Creek

Packsaddle

Midget Peak

Saddle Mountain

Wonderful Peak

Skitwish Ridge Trouble Creek

Grandmother Mountain

Continental Mountain

Kootenai Peak

Blacktail Mountain #161

Buckhorn Ridge

Blacktail Mountain #122

Stevens Peak

West Fork Elk

Hellroaring

Little Grass Mountain

Gilt Edge-Silver Creek

East Fork Elk

§ ̈¦90

£¤2

£¤95

£¤10

£¤95

£¤95

£¤10

¬«57

¬«97

¬«41

¬«5

¬«3

¬«9

¬«1

¬«8

¬«6

¬«200

¬«53

¬«54

¬«60

¬«99

¬«58

¬«66

¬«2

¬«8

¬«8

¬«6

¬«97

Athol

Elmira

Mullan

Tensed

Worley

Hauser

Bayview

Nordman

Copeland

Rathdrum

Sandpoint

Elk River

Spirit Lake

Hayden Lake

Priest River

Saint Maries

Bonners Ferry

Management Themes Applied to Idaho Roadless Areas

Wild Land Recreation

Primitive

Backcountry/Restoration

General Forest , Rangeland and Grassland

Forest Plan Special Areas

Wilderness

National Forest System Lands

(Other ownership is not displayed)

Idaho Panhandle/Kootenai Existing Plan Management Themes

10 5 0 10 I Miles

The USDA Forest Service uses the most current and complete

data available. GIS Data and product accuracy may vary.

Using GIS products for puposes other than those for which they

were intended may yield inaccurate or misleading results.

The USDA Forest Service reserves the right to correct, update,

modify, or replace GIS products without notification.
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Jose Liborio CISNEROS-JIMENEZ, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 04-41386

Summary Calendar.

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.

Decided Feb. 23, 2006.

James Lee Turner, Renata Ann Gowie, Assistant U.S. Attorneys, U.S. Attorney’s Office Southern District of Texas, Houston, TX, for Plaintiff-Appellee.

Marjorie A. Meyers, Federal Public Defender, Margaret Christina Ling, Assistant Federal Public Defender, Federal Public Defender’s Office Southern District of Texas, Houston, TX, for Defendant-Appellant.

Before BARKSDALE, STEWART and CLEMENT, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: *

Jose Liborio Cisneros-Jimenez appeals his guilty-plea conviction and sentence for being found in the United States, without permission, following deportation. *See*8 U.S.C. § 1326(a), (b). He contends that the sentencing provisions in 8 U.S.C. § 1326(b) are unconstitutional because they do not require the fact of a prior felony or aggravated felony conviction to be treated as an element of the offense and proved beyond a reasonable doubt. Cisneros-Jimenez’s constitutional challenge is foreclosed by *Almendarez-Torres v. United States,*523 U.S. 224, 235, 118 S.Ct. 1219, 140 L.Ed.2d 350 (1998). Although Cisneros-Jimenez contends that *Almendarez-Torres*was incorrectly decided and that a majority of the Supreme Court would overrule *Almendarez-Torres*
      *599in light of *Apprendi v. New Jersey,*530 U.S. 466, 120 S.Ct. 2348, 147 L.Ed.2d 435 (2000), we have repeatedly rejected such arguments on the basis that *Almendarez-Torres*remains binding. *See United States v. Garza-Lopez,*410 F.3d 268, 276 (5th Cir.), *cert. denied,*— U.S.-, 126 S.Ct. 298, 163 L.Ed.2d 260 (2005). Cisneros-Jimenez properly concedes that his argument is foreclosed in light of *Almendarez-Torres*and circuit precedent, but he raises it here to preserve it for further review. Accordingly, Cisneros-Jimenez’s conviction is AFFIRMED.

Cisneros-Jimenez also argues that the district court committed reversible error when it sentenced him pursuant to the mandatory United States Sentencing Guidelines scheme held unconstitutional in *United States v. Booker,*543 U.S. 220, 125 S.Ct. 738, 160 L.Ed.2d 621 (2005). By sentencing Cisneros-Jimenez under a mandatory guidelines regime, the district court committed what this court refers to as Fanfan error. *See United States v. Walters,*418 F.3d 461, 463 (5th Cir.2005). The Government concedes that CisnerosJimenez preserved his Fanfan claim for appellate review, that the district court’s actions are reviewed for harmless error, and that it cannot show that the error was harmless. *See id.*at 463-64. The sentencing transcript supports the Government’s concession. We therefore we VACATE Cisneros-Jimenez’s sentence and REMAND the case for resentencing.

CONVICTION AFFIRMED; SENTENCE VACATED; CASE REMANDED.

Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.
January 2024

Day

Shasta 

Inflow

C.F.S.

1

Prev Day

F.C. Par

(Col. 3)

X .95

2

F.C

Param

(Cols. 1+2)

3

.0356*

X Days

12/23 Thru

3/20

4

530,000

Minus

F.C.

Param

(Col 3)

5

Cols

4x5

6

F.C.

Reserv

(1,300,000 - 

Col 6)

7

Minus 

14,943

Per Day

After

3/20

8

Adjusted

F.C.

Reserv

(7-8)

Perm

Storage

109,921

1 7,445 104,425 111,870 0.3168 418,130 132,464 1,167,536 3,384,000

2 8,082 106,276 114,358 0.3520 415,642 146,306 1,153,694 3,398,000

3 8,581 108,641 117,222 0.3872 412,779 159,828 1,140,172 3,412,000

4 6,838 111,360 118,198 0.4224 411,802 173,945 1,126,055 3,426,000

5 6,029 112,289 118,318 0.4576 411,683 188,386 1,111,614 3,440,000

6 4,343 112,402 116,745 0.4928 413,255 203,652 1,096,348 3,456,000

7 3,679 110,907 114,586 0.5280 415,414 219,338 1,080,662 3,471,000

8 5,444 108,857 114,301 0.5632 415,699 234,122 1,065,878 3,486,000

9 4,534 108,586 113,120 0.5984 416,880 249,461 1,050,539 3,501,000

10 6,694 107,464 114,158 0.6336 415,842 263,477 1,036,523 3,515,000

11 5,225 108,450 113,675 0.6688 416,325 278,438 1,021,562 3,530,000

12 6,052 107,991 114,043 0.7040 415,957 292,834 1,007,166 3,545,000

13 8,679 108,341 117,020 0.7392 412,980 305,275 994,725 3,557,000

14 8,125 111,169 119,294 0.7744 410,706 318,051 981,949 3,570,000

15 4,916 113,329 118,245 0.8096 411,755 333,357 966,643 3,585,000

16 7,176 112,333 119,509 0.8448 410,491 346,783 953,217 3,599,000

17 6,966 113,534 120,500 0.8800 409,500 360,360 939,640 3,612,000

18 8,124 114,475 122,599 0.9152 407,401 372,854 927,146 3,625,000

19 9,508 116,469 125,977 0.9504 404,023 383,984 916,016 3,636,000

20 24,461 119,678 144,139 0.9856 385,861 380,305 919,695 3,632,000

21 36,242 136,932 173,174 1.0208 356,826 364,248 935,752 3,616,000

22 48,526 164,515 213,041 1.0560 316,959 334,708 965,292 3,587,000

23 25,828 202,389 228,217 1.0912 301,783 329,305 970,695 3,581,000

24 24,014 216,806 240,820 1.1264 289,180 325,732 974,268 3,578,000

25 19,903 228,779 248,682 1.1616 281,318 326,779 973,221 3,579,000

26 16,467 236,248 252,715 1.1968 277,285 331,854 968,146 3,584,000

27 13,379 240,079 253,458 1.2320 276,542 340,699 959,301 3,593,000

28 11,379 240,786 252,165 1.2672 277,836 352,073 947,927 3,604,000

29 11,299 239,556 250,855 1.3024 279,145 363,558 936,442 3,616,000

30 11,013 238,313 249,326 1.3376 280,675 375,430 924,570 3,627,000

31 16,952 236,859 253,811 1.3728 276,189 379,152 920,848 3,631,000

Comments: 

* LEAP YEAR CONSTANT = .0352 

CONSTANT .0356 = 1,300,000 / (TOTAL DAYS X (530,000 - 110,000 ) ) 

IF COL 3 IS GREATER THAN 530,000 OR LESS THAN 110,000 USE THOSE VALUES FOR COL 3 INSTEAD OF THE COMPUTED VALUE

Historical Archive and Report Database

Lake Shasta Flood Control Requirements

Run Date: 2/10/2024
---

EXHIBIT 32.1

|CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO                     
|----------------------------------------------
|18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
|SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 

I, Garth Likes, hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:

|(1) | the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Compass Biotechnologies
      Inc. for the year ended January 31, 2011 (the "Report") fully complies
      with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange
      Act of 1934; and
|--- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|    |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                               
|(2) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents,
      in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
      operations of Compass Biotechnologies Inc.                                                              

Dated: May 17, 2011

| | /s/
      Garth Likes                                  
| | -------------------------------------------------------
| | Garth Likes                                            
| | President, Chief Executive Officer and Director        
| | (Principal Executive Officer, Principal
      Financial
| | Officer and Principal Accounting Officer)              
| | Compass Biotechnologies Inc.                           

A signed original of this written statement required by Section
906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the
signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this
written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to Compass
Biotechnologies Inc. and will be retained by Compass Biotechnologies Inc. and
furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

---
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY ELEV

 975.50

 978.37

 980.29

 981.18

 982.49

 983.78

 984.63

 985.36

 985.88

 986.41

 986.86

 987.22

 987.77

 988.37

 988.80

 989.25

 989.74

 990.42

 991.68

 993.24

 994.54

 996.27

 998.00

 999.19

 1,000.15

 1,000.96

 1,001.84

 1,002.93

 1,004.09

 1,005.47

 1,007.12

 2,329.2

 2,384.3

 2,421.7

 2,439.1

 2,464.9

 2,490.5

 2,507.5

 2,522.2

 2,532.6

 2,543.4

 2,552.5

 2,559.8

 2,571.0

 2,583.2

 2,592.0

 2,601.2

 2,611.3

 2,625.3

 2,651.4

 2,684.0

 2,711.4

 2,748.2

 2,785.2

 2,811.0

 2,831.8

 2,849.5

 2,868.7

 2,892.7

 2,918.4

 2,949.2

 2,986.3

STORAGE

+44.8

+55.1

+37.4

+17.4

+25.8

+25.6

+17.0

+14.6

+10.5

+10.7

+9.1

+7.3

+11.1

+12.2

+8.8

+9.2

+10.1

+14.0

+26.1

+32.6

+27.4

+36.7

+37.1

+25.7

+20.9

+17.7

+19.3

+24.0

+25.7

+30.8

+37.1

CHANGE

 25,317

 30,618

 21,236

 12,568

 15,928

 16,353

 12,301

 10,611

 8,705

 8,819

 8,003

 7,281

 9,263

 9,736

 7,661

 8,088

 8,260

 10,342

 15,354

 18,520

 14,158

 18,767

 18,691

 13,391

 11,242

 9,837

 10,620

 12,828

 14,553

 16,765

 19,682

INFLOW

 2,710

 2,835

 2,401

 3,781

 2,909

 3,444

 3,659

 3,152

 3,421

 3,364

 3,349

 3,601

 3,621

 3,574

 3,173

 3,434

 3,180

 3,269

 2,180

 2,083

 351

 245

 0

 424

 727

 939

 902

 734

 1,603

 1,249

 991

POWER

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

SPILL

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

OUTLET

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 82

 77

 12

 36

 42

 0

 30

 0

 54

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

C.F.S.

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .14

 .13

 .02

 .06

 .07

 .00

 .05

 .00

 .09

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

INCHES

 2.62

 3.21

 .61

 .00

 .80

 1.40

 .01

 .00

 .14

 .14

 .00

 .00

 .00

 1.93

 .00

 .00

 .87

 .14

 1.00

 1.57

 .52

 1.05

 1.66

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .25

 .90

 .17

 1.20

PRECIP

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

DECEMBER 2001 SHASTA LAKE DAILY OPERATIONS RUN DATE: January 24, 2002

IN LAKE

EVAPORATION

INCHES

C.F.S.

COMPUTED*

1000 ACRE-FEET

RELEASE - C.F.S.

RIVER

TOTALS +701.8 425,498 71,305 0 0 333 .56 20.19

ACRE-FEET +701,800 843,975 141,433 0 0 661

COMMENTS:

* COMPUTED INFLOW IS THE SUM OF CHANGE IN STORAGE, RELEASES AND EVAPORATION.

SUMMARY

RELEASE (ACRE-FEET)

POWER 141,433

SPILL 0

OUTLET

TOTAL

 0

 141,433

PRECIPITATION

THIS MONTH =

TO DATE =

 20.19

JULY 1, 2001 39.41

 2,284.4

Table 3
Exhibit
32.2
 
 
 CERTIFICATION
 
 In
connection with the Annual Report of the Registrant on Form 10-K for the period
ended December 31, 2007, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on
the date hereof (the “Report”), the undersigned certify pursuant to § 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:
 
 (1)
              The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
and
 
 (2)
              The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Registrant.
 
 
 /s/
      Gysle R. Shellum
                
                February 25,
      2009Gysle
      R. ShellumChief
      Financial Officer
                  Petroleum
      Development Corporation
                  Managing
      General Partner
 
 A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document
authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears
in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required
by Section 906, has been provided the Registrant and will be retained by the
Registrant and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff
upon request.
Editorial Note on Part 416
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 416 appear at 68 FR 53509, Sept. 11, 2003.

§ 416.1417 Disability hearing—disability hearing officer's reconsidered determination. ( a ) *General.* The disability hearing officer who conducts your disability hearing will prepare and will issue a written reconsidered determination, unless: ( 1 ) The disability hearing officer sends the case back for additional development by the component that prepared the case for the hearing, and that component issues a favorable determination, as permitted by § 416.1416(c);
( 2 ) It is determined that you are engaging in substantial gainful activity and that you are therefore not disabled; or
( 3 ) The reconsidered determination prepared by the disability hearing officer is reviewed under § 416.1418.
( b ) *Content.* The disability hearing officer's reconsidered determination will give the findings of fact and the reasons for the reconsidered determination. The disability hearing officer must base the reconsidered determination on the preponderance of the evidence offered at the disability hearing or otherwise included in your case file.
( c ) *Notice.* We will mail you and the other parties a notice of reconsidered determination in accordance with § 416.1422.
( d ) *Effect.* The disability hearing officer's reconsidered determination, or, if it is changed under § 416.1418, the reconsidered determination that is issued by the Associate Commissioner for Disability Determinations or his or her delegate, is binding in accordance with § 416.1421, subject to the exceptions specified in that section.
[51 FR 306, Jan. 3, 1986, as amended at 71 FR 10432, Mar. 1, 2006; 73 FR 76944, Dec. 18, 2008]
J A C K  D. H I D A R Y



Scot Melland
CEO
Dice
3 Park Avenue, 33rd Floor
New York, NY 10016

Dear Scot:

         As of today, I am resigning from the board of Dice, Inc.



                                         Sincerely,

                                         /s/ Jack D. Hindary
                                         --------------------------
                                         Jack D. Hindary















                    378 THIRD AVENUE NEW YORK, NEW YORK 10016

                      PHONE: 212 684 3605 FAX: 646 349 4998
April 15, 2014

JUDGMENT

The Fourteenth Court of Appeals

JOHN M. PERONE, Appellant

NO. 14-12-00969-CR V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

________________________________

This cause was heard on the transcript of the record of the court below. 

Having considered the record, this Court holds that there was no error in the 

judgment. The Court orders the judgment AFFIRMED.

We further order this decision certified below for observance.
```

[113th Congress Public Law 170]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]

[[Page 128 STAT. 1894]]

Public Law 113-170
113th Congress

                                 An Act

 
 To amend title 5, United States Code, to extend the period of certain 
 authority with respect to judicial review of Merit Systems Protection 
       Board decisions relating to whistleblowers, and for other 
           purposes. <<NOTE: Sept. 26, 2014 -  [H.R. 4197]>> 

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled, <<NOTE: All Circuit 
Review Extension Act.>> 
SECTION 1. <<NOTE: 5 USC 101 note.>>  SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``All Circuit Review Extension Act''.
SEC. 2. JUDICIAL REVIEW OF MERIT SYSTEMS PROTECTION BOARD 
                    DECISIONS RELATING TO WHISTLEBLOWERS.

    (a) In General.--Section 7703(b)(1)(B) of title 5, United States 
Code, is amended by striking ``2-year'' and inserting ``5-year''.
    (b) Director Review.--Section 7703(d)(2) of such title is amended by 
striking ``2-year'' and inserting ``5-year''.

    Approved September 26, 2014.

LEGISLATIVE HISTORY--H.R. 4197:
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

HOUSE REPORTS: No. 113-519, Pt. 1 (Comm. on Oversight and Government 
Reform).
CONGRESSIONAL RECORD, Vol. 160 (2014):
            July 14, considered and passed House.
            Sept. 11, considered and passed Senate.

                                  <all>
```
IN THE

TENTH COURT OF APPEALS

No. 10-15-00023-CV

MICHAEL D. EADES AND REBECCA EADES,

Appellants

v.

SUNRISE ESTATES PROPERTY OWNERS ASSOCIATION,

Appellee

From the 13th District Court

Navarro County, Texas

Trial Court No. 09-17965-CV

ORDER

This appeal was referred to mediation on February 26, 2015. The parties were 

ordered to confer and attempt to agree upon a mediator. Within fourteen days after the 

date of the February 26, 2015 Order, Appellants were ordered to file a notice with the 

Clerk of this Court which either identified the agreed-upon mediator or stated that the

parties were unable to agree upon a mediator. More than 14 days have passed and we 

have not been provided notice that identified the agreed-upon mediator or stated that the

parties were unable to agree upon a mediator.
Eades v. Sunrise Estates Property Owners Association Page 2

Accordingly, the Court assigns the Honorable Rick Morris as the mediator for this 

proceeding. His address and contact number are as follows:

P.O. Box 1163

Salado, TX 76571

(254) 718-3388

All other provision of the order referring the appeal to mediation, dated February 

26, 2015, remain in effect, including that mediation must occur within thirty days after 

the date of this Order assigning a mediator.

PER CURIAM

Before Chief Justice Gray,

Justice Davis, and

Justice Scoggins

Mediator assigned

Order issued and filed April 16, 2015
#### § 411.550 How are the outcome payments calculated under the outcome payment system?

The amount of each monthly outcome payment under the outcome payment system is calculated as follows:

(1) For title II disability beneficiaries (including concurrent title II/title XVI disability beneficiaries), an outcome payment is equal to 67% of the payment calculation base as defined in § 411.500(a)(1) for the calendar year in which the month occurs, rounded to the nearest whole dollar;

(2) For title XVI disability beneficiaries (who are not concurrently title II/title XVI disability beneficiaries), an outcome payment is equal to 67% of the payment calculation base as defined in § 411.500(a)(2) for the calendar year in which the month occurs, rounded to the nearest whole dollar.

| Payment type | Beneficiary earnings | Title II amount of monthly outcome payment | Title II total outcome payments |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Outcome payments 1-36 (67% of PCB) | Monthly cash benefit not payable due to SGA | $657.00 | $23,652 |

Chart II—New Outcome Payment System Table—Title II and Concurrent

[2008 figures for illustration only]

| Payment type | Beneficiary earnings | Title XVI amount of monthly outcome payment | Title XVI total outcome payments |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Outcome payments 1-60 (67% of PCB) | Earnings sufficient to “0” out Federal SSI cash benefits | $377.00 | $22,620 |

Chart III—New Outcome Payment System Table—Title XVI Only

[2008 figures for illustration only]

Note:

Outcome payment (outcome payment system) = 67% of PCB Individual payments are rounded to the nearest dollar amount.

2008 non-blind SGA level = $940.

2008 Blind SGA = $1570.

2008 TWP service amount = $670.

[73 FR 29348, May 20, 2008]