SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
                         Washington, D.C. 20549

---

FORM 10-Q

---

(Mark One)

[X]      QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE
             SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the quarterly period ended June 30, 2002
 or

[  ]       TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES
     EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the transition period from ________to _________

Commission file number:    000-13333

ENSTAR INCOME PROGRAM 1984-1, L.P.



|Georgia                                                        | 58-1581136                             
|-------------------------------------------------------------- | ---------------------------------------
|(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization) | (I.R.S. Employer Identification Number)

12405 Powerscourt Drive
St. Louis, Missouri   63131

(314) 965-0555







Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required
to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant
was required to file reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing
requirements for the past 90 days. YES [X] NO [  ]







ENSTAR INCOME PROGRAM 1984-1, L.P.

      Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the Period ended June 30, 2002
                                Table of Contents



|PART I.   FINANCIAL INFORMATION                                                                                       | Page No.
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | --------
|                                                                                                                      |         
|Item 1. Financial Statements - Enstar Income Program 1984-1, L.P.                                                     |         
|                                                                                                                      |         
|Condensed Balance Sheets as of June 30, 2002 and December 31, 2001                                                    | 3       
|                                                                                                                      |         
|Condensed Statements of Operations for the
    three and six months ended June 30, 2002 and 2001                      | 4       
|                                                                                                                      |         
|Condensed Statements of Cash Flows for the
    six months ended June 30, 2002 and 2001                                | 5       
|                                                                                                                      |         
|Notes to Unaudited Financial Statements                                                                               | 6       
|                                                                                                                      |         
|Item 2.   Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial
                      Condition and Results of Operations | 8       
|                                                                                                                      |         
|PART II.  OTHER INFORMATION                                                                                           |         
|                                                                                                                      |         
|Item 6.   Exhibits and Reports on Form 8-K                                                                            | 12      
|                                                                                                                      |         
|Signatures                                                                                                            | 13      

PART I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION.

ITEM 1. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.

---

ENSTAR INCOME PROGRAM 1984-1, L.P.

                      CONDENSED BALANCE SHEETS

`June 30,     December 31,
                                                                                 2002         2001 *
                                                                             ------------  ------------
                                                                             (unaudited)
                              ASSETS
ASSETS:
   Cash.................................................................... $  1,897,800  $  2,222,100
   Accounts receivable.....................................................       85,300       134,800
   Prepaid expenses and other assets.......................................       44,200        50,000
   Property, plant and equipment, net of accumulated
     depreciation of $11,483,500 and $10,985,300, respectively.............    4,198,600     4,046,200
   Franchise cost, net of accumulated amortization of
     $39,300 and $35,100, respectively.....................................       41,400        45,600
                                                                             ------------  ------------
         Total assets......................................................    6,267,300     6,498,700
                                                                             ============  ============

                LIABILITIES AND PARTNERSHIP CAPITAL
LIABILITIES:
   Accounts payable........................................................ $     90,100  $     80,900
   Accrued liabilities.....................................................      461,100     1,150,100
   Due to affiliates.......................................................      932,100       414,600
                                                                             ------------  ------------
          Total liabilities................................................    1,483,300     1,645,600
                                                                             ------------  ------------
PARTNERSHIP CAPITAL (DEFICIT):
   General Partner.........................................................      (24,900)      (24,200)
   Limited Partners........................................................    4,808,900     4,877,300
                                                                             ------------  ------------
          Total partnership capital........................................    4,784,000     4,853,100
                                                                             ------------  ------------
          Total liabilities and partnership capital........................ $  6,267,300  $  6,498,700
                                                                             ============  ============`

*    Agrees with the audited balance sheet included in the
     Partnership's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2001.

See accompanying notes to condensed financial statements.

---

ENSTAR INCOME PROGRAM 1984-1, L.P.

                  CONDENSED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS

`Three Months Ended        Six Months Ended
                                                               June 30,                June 30,
                                                        ----------------------  -----------------------
                                                           2002        2001        2002        2001
                                                        ----------  ----------  ----------  -----------
                                                             (unaudited)               (unaudited)

REVENUES.............................................. $  846,600  $  950,600  $1,754,500  $ 1,899,500

OPERATING EXPENSES:
   Service costs......................................    376,900     410,300     726,300      797,300
   General and administrative expenses................    212,800     282,800     400,400      488,600
   General partner management fees and                         --          --          --           --
     reimbursed expenses..............................    101,800     111,300     206,700      215,200
   Depreciation and amortization......................    257,900     199,400     502,400      394,200
                                                        ----------  ----------  ----------  -----------
                                                          949,400   1,003,800   1,835,800    1,895,300
                                                        ----------  ----------  ----------  -----------
OPERATING INCOME (LOSS)...............................   (102,800)    (53,200)    (81,300)       4,200
                                                        ----------  ----------  ----------  -----------

OTHER INCOME (EXPENSE):
   Interest income....................................      5,300      25,700      10,000       42,200
   Interest expense...................................         --      (6,600)         --      (12,600)
   Other income (expense).............................        100    (340,200)      2,200     (345,900)
                                                        ----------  ----------  ----------  -----------
                                                            5,400    (321,100)     12,200     (316,300)
                                                        ----------  ----------  ----------  -----------
NET LOSS.............................................. $  (97,400) $ (374,300) $  (69,100) $  (312,100)
                                                        ==========  ==========  ==========  ===========
Net loss allocated to General Partner................. $   (1,000) $   (3,700) $     (700) $    (3,100)
                                                        ==========  ==========  ==========  ===========
Net loss allocated to Limited Partners................ $  (96,400) $ (370,600) $  (68,400) $  (309,000)
                                                        ==========  ==========  ==========  ===========
NET LOSS PER UNIT OF LIMITED PARTNERSHIP INTEREST..... $    (3.22) $   (12.38) $    (2.28) $    (10.32)
                                                        ==========  ==========  ==========  ===========
AVERAGE LIMITED PARTNERSHIP UNITS OUTSTANDING
DURING PERIOD.........................................     29,940      29,940      29,940       29,940
                                                        ==========  ==========  ==========  ===========`

See accompanying notes to condensed financial statements.

---

ENSTAR INCOME PROGRAM 1984-1, L.P.

                 CONDENSED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS

`Six Months Ended
                                                                                             June 30,
                                                                                     ------------------------
                                                                                        2002         2001
                                                                                     -----------  -----------
                                                                                            (unaudited)

CASH FLOWS FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES:
   Net loss........................................................................ $   (69,100) $  (312,100)
   Adjustments to reconcile net loss to net cash flows from operating activities:
      Depreciation and amortization................................................     502,400      394,200
      Changes in:
      Accounts receivable, prepaid expenses and other assets.......................      55,300        5,500
      Accounts payable, accrued liabilities and due to affiliates..................    (162,300)     321,300
                                                                                     -----------  -----------
          Net cash flows from operating activities.................................     326,300      408,900
                                                                                     -----------  -----------
CASH FLOWS FROM INVESTING ACTIVITIES:
   Capital expenditures............................................................    (650,600)    (312,100)
   Other investing activities......................................................          --       (6,000)
                                                                                     -----------  -----------
          Net cash flows from investing activities.................................    (650,600)    (318,100)
                                                                                     -----------  -----------
CASH FLOWS FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES:
   Other financing activities......................................................          --       (3,300)
                                                                                     -----------  -----------
          Net cash flows from financing activities.................................          --       (3,300)
                                                                                     -----------  -----------
NET INCREASE (DECREASE) IN CASH ...................................................    (324,300)      87,500

CASH, beginning of period..........................................................   2,222,100    2,366,800
                                                                                     -----------  -----------
CASH, end of period................................................................ $ 1,897,800  $ 2,454,300
                                                                                     ===========  ===========`

See accompanying notes to condensed financial statements.

---

ENSTAR INCOME/GROWTH PROGRAM 1984-1, L.P.

                  NOTES TO CONDENSED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

                             (UNAUDITED)



1.	INTERIM FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

The accompanying condensed interim financial statements
for Enstar Income Program 1984-1, L.P. (the Partnership) as of June 30, 2002,
and for the three and six months ended June 30, 2002 and 2001, are unaudited.
These condensed interim financial statements should be read in conjunction with
the audited financial statements and notes thereto included in the Partnership's
Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2001. In the opinion
of management, the condensed interim financial statements reflect all
adjustments (consisting only of normal recurring adjustments) necessary for a
fair presentation of the results of such periods. The results of operations for
the three and six months ended June 30, 2002 are not necessarily indicative of
results for the entire year. As discussed in Note 3 below, current franchise
disputes and overbuild issues could have a material adverse effect on the
Partnership's operations.

The preparation of financial statements in conformity with
accounting principles generally accepted in the United States requires
management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of
assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at
the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and
expenses during the reporting period. These estimates include useful lives of
property, plant and equipment, valuation of long-lived assets and allocated
operating costs. Actual results could differ from those estimates.

Reclassifications

Certain 2001 amounts have been reclassified to conform
with the 2002 presentation.

2.	TRANSACTIONS WITH THE GENERAL PARTNER AND AFFILIATES

The Partnership has a management and service agreement
(the Management Agreement) with Enstar Cable Corporation (Enstar Cable), a
wholly owned subsidiary of Enstar Communications Corporation (ECC), the
Corporate General Partner, for a monthly management fee of 5% of gross revenues,
as defined, from operations of the Partnership, excluding revenues from the sale
of cable television systems or franchises. Management fee expense approximated
$42,300 and $47,500 for the three months ended June 30, 2002 and 2001,
respectively, and $87,700 and $95,000 for the six months ended June 30, 2002 and
2001, respectively.

In addition to the monthly management fee, the Partnership
reimburses Enstar Cable for direct expenses incurred on behalf of the
Partnership, and for the Partnership's allocable share of operational costs
associated with services provided by Enstar Cable. Additionally, Charter
Communications Holding Company, LLC and its affiliates (collectively, Charter)
provide other management and operational services for the Partnership. These
expenses are charged to the properties served based primarily on the
Partnership's allocable share of operational costs associated with the services
provided. The Partnership reimburses the affiliates for the Partnership's
allocable share of the affiliates' costs. The total amount charged to the
Partnership for these services approximated $59,500 and $63,800 for the three
months ended June 30, 2002 and 2001, respectively, and $119,000 and $120,200 for
the six months ended June 30, 2002 and 2001, respectively.

All programming services are purchased through Charter.
Charter charges the Partnership for these costs based on an allocation of its
costs. The Partnership recorded programming fee expense of $206,500 and $211,900
for the three months ended June 30, 2002 and 2001, respectively, and $417,900
and $427,100 for the six months ended June 30, 2002 and 2001, respectively.
Programming fees are included in service costs in the accompanying condensed
statements of operations.

All amounts owed to the General Partner and affiliates are
non-interest bearing.

3.	CERTAIN TRENDS AND UNCERTAINTIES

The Partnership's franchise agreement with the City of
Covington, Tennessee ("the City") expired in 1994. By agreement with the City,
the Partnership has continued to operate the cable system in Covington and pay
franchise fees to the City on a month-to-month basis until a new franchise
agreement is reached. In March 2000, the Corporate General Partner submitted a
renewal proposal to the City on behalf of the Partnership. In November 2000, the
City sold municipal bonds to finance construction of a municipally-owned cable
system. The City completed the construction project in the first quarter of 2002
and is actively competing with the Partnership.

In July 2002, the Partnership received a letter from the City
Attorney advising the Partnership that it may not operate within the city limits
and demanding the Partnership to discontinue service within thirty days. On
August 7, 2002, the Corporate General Partner filed a lawsuit on behalf of
Partnership in the United States District Court for the Western District of
Tennessee ("the Court") against the City, the Covington Electric System Board of
Public Utilities and Covington Cable. The Partnership alleges that the City and
other defendants are unlawfully attempting to shut down the Partnership's cable
television system in Covington, in order to eliminate competition to the new
City-owned cable system. The Partnership also alleges that the City failed to
follow the federal statutory procedures governing the renewal of a cable
television franchise and is now attempting to shut down the Partnership's cable
system, without having complied with those procedures or even formally having
denied the numerous renewal proposals, in contravention of federal law. The
Partnership seeks a declaration from the Court that the City's actions are
unlawful and violate the 1992 Cable Act, franchise provisions, federal antitrust
laws, state common law, the Tennessee Consumer Protection Act and both the
United States and Tennessee Constitutions. The Partnership is also seeking a
preliminary injunction against all three defendants. The defendants have agreed
to take no action against the Partnership's provision of services in Covington
until the Court has ruled on the motion for preliminary injunction.

If the Partnership is unsuccessful in the lawsuit, the
Partnership may have to terminate its operations. The loss of the Partnership's
franchise and the related loss of customers would have a significant adverse
impact on the Partnership's financial condition and operating results. No
impairment charges were recorded on Brownsville's property, plant and equipment
and franchise costs, which includes all properties served by the Brownsville
headend, namely Covington, Bolivar and Brownsville. Collectively, the properties
had a carrying value of $2,043,000 at June 30, 2002. This is approximately 48%
of the total investment in cable properties.

In January 2000, the franchise authority in Bolivar,
Tennessee authorized its municipal utility to construct and operate a competing
cable system in that franchise area. The Partnership has continued to operate
the cable system in Bolivar and pay franchise fees to the franchise authority.
Although the municipal utility has not obtained funds to build a cable system,
the Partnership believes that if a competing system were built, the loss of
customers would have an adverse impact on the financial condition and results of
operations of the Partnership. As of June 30, 2002, the Partnership had
approximately 1,700 and 1,300 basic customers in the cities of Covington and
Bolivar, respectively.

4.	NET LOSS PER UNIT OF LIMITED PARTNERSHIP INTEREST

Net loss per unit of limited partnership interest is
based on the average number of units outstanding during the periods presented.
For this purpose, net loss has been allocated 99% to the Limited Partners and 1%
to the General Partner. The General Partner does not own units of partnership
interest in the Partnership, but rather holds a participation interest in the
income, losses and distributions of the Partnership.

5.	RECENTLY ISSUED ACCOUNTING STANDARDS

In June 2002, the Financial Accounting Standards Board
issued SFAS No. 146, "Accounting for Costs Associated with Exit or Disposal
Activities." SFAS No. 146 addresses financial accounting and reporting for costs
associated with exit or disposal activities and nullifies Emerging Issues Task
Force Issue No. 94-3, "Liability Recognition for Certain Employee Termination
Benefits and Other Costs to Exit an Activity (including Certain Costs Incurred
in a Restructuring)." SFAS No. 146 requires that a liability for costs
associated with an exit or disposal activity be recognized when the liability is
incurred rather than when a company commits to such an activity and also
establishes fair value as the objective for initial measurement of the
liability. The Partnership will adopt SFAS No. 146 for exit or disposal
activities that are initiated after December 31, 2002. Adoption will not have a
material impact on the Partnership's financial statements.

ITEM 2. MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF
FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

INTRODUCTION

This report includes certain forward-looking statements
regarding, among other things, our future results of operations, regulatory
requirements, competition, capital needs and general business conditions
applicable to us. Such forward-looking statements involve risks and
uncertainties including, without limitation, the uncertainty of legislative and
regulatory changes and the rapid developments in the competitive environment
facing cable television operators such as us. In addition to the information
provided herein, reference is made to our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the
year ended December 31, 2001 for additional information regarding such matters
and the effect thereof on our business.

RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

Revenues decreased $104,000 from $950,600 to $846,600, or
10.9%, and $145,000 from $1,899,500 to $1,754,500, or 7.6%, for the three and
six months ended June 30, 2002, respectively, compared to the corresponding
periods in 2001. The decrease was primarily due to a decline in basic and
premium service customers partially offset by an increase in prices. As of June
30, 2002 and 2001, we had approximately 6,500 and 8,100 basic service customers,
respectively, and 2,800 and 5,000 premium service customers, respectively.

Service costs decreased $33,400 from $410,300 to $376,900, or
8.1%, and $71,000 from $797,300 to $726,300, or 8.9%, for the three and six
months ended June 30, 2002, respectively, compared to the corresponding periods
in 2001. Service costs represent programming costs and other costs directly
attributable to providing cable services to customers. The decrease was
primarily due to the decline in basic and premium service customers.

General and administrative expenses decreased $70,000 from
$282,800 to $212,800, or 24.8%, and $88,200 from $488,600 to $400,400, or 18.1%,
for the three and six months ended June 30, 2002, respectively, compared to the
corresponding periods in 2001. The decrease was due primarily to lower franchise
and excise taxes and professional fees compared to the corresponding periods in
2001.

General partner management fees and reimbursed expenses
decreased $9,500 from $111,300 to $101,800, or 8.5%, and $8,500 from $215,200 to
$206,700, or 3.9%, for the three and six months ended June 30, 2002,
respectively, compared to the corresponding periods in 2001. These costs
represent administrative costs reimbursed to Charter by us based on Charter's
actual costs incurred. The decrease was primarily due to a decrease in the level
of such services being provided and billed to us by Charter.

Depreciation and amortization expense increased $58,500 from
$199,400 to $257,900, or 29.3%, and $108,200 from $394,200 to $502,400, or
27.4%, for the three and six months ended June 30, 2002, respectively, compared
to the corresponding periods in 2001. The increase was due primarily to capital
expenditures during the six months ended June 30, 2002 and the last half of 2001
relating to cable systems upgrades.

Due to the factors described above, operating loss increased
$49,600 from $53,200 to $102,800, or 93.2%, and operating income decreased
$85,500 from $4,200 to a loss of $81,300, for the three and six months ended
June 30, 2002, respectively, compared to the corresponding periods in 2001.

Interest income decreased $20,400 from $25,700 to $5,300, or
79.4%, and $32,200 from $42,200 to $10,000, or 76.3%, for the three and six
months ended June 30, 2002, respectively, compared to the corresponding periods
in 2001. The decrease was primarily due to lower average cash balances available
for investment coupled with lower interest rates during the three and six months
ended June 30, 2002 compared to the corresponding periods in 2001.

Interest expense decreased from $6,600 to $0 and from $12,600
to $0 for the three and six months ended June 30, 2002, respectively, compared
to the corresponding periods in 2001. The decrease was due to no outstanding
borrowings under our loan facility during the three and six months ended June
30, 2002 as the loan facility expired on August 31, 2001.

Other income of $100 and other expense of $340,200 for the
three months ended June 30, 2002 and 2001, respectively, and other income of
$2,200 and other expense of $345,900 for the six months ended June 30, 2002 and
2001, respectively, represent a gain on the sale of fixed assets in 2002 and
costs associated with a previous unexecuted sales proposal in 2001.

Due to the factors described above, our net loss decreased
$276,900 from $374,300 to $97,400, or 74.0%, and $243,000 from $312,100 to
$69,100, or 77.9%, for the three and six months ended June 30, 2002,
respectively, compared to the corresponding periods in 2001.

LIQUIDITY AND CAPITAL RESOURCES

Our primary objective, having invested net offering
proceeds in cable television systems, is to distribute to our partners all
available cash flow from operations and proceeds from the sale of cable systems,
if any, after providing for expenses and any planned capital requirements. In
general, these capital requirements involve expansion, improvement and upgrade
of our existing cable systems.

Based on our experience in the cable television industry, we
believe that income before interest, income taxes, depreciation and
amortization, or EBITDA, and related measures of cash flow serve as important
financial analysis tools for measuring and comparing cable television companies
in several areas, such as liquidity, operating performance and leverage. EBITDA
is not a measurement determined under generally accepted accounting principles
(GAAP) and does not represent cash generated from operating activities in
accordance with GAAP. EBITDA should not be considered by the reader as an
alternative to net income as an indicator of financial performance or as an
alternative to cash flows as a measure of liquidity. In addition, the definition
of EBITDA may not be identical to similarly titled measures used by other
companies. EBITDA increased $370,800 from $52,500 to $423,300 for the six months
ended June 30, 2002 compared to the corresponding period in 2001. As a
percentage of revenues, EBITDA increased 21.3%, from 2.8% to 24.1%, during the
six months ended June 30, 2002 compared to the corresponding period in 2001.

Operating activities provided $326,300 and $408,900 in cash
during the six months ended June 30, 2002 and 2001, respectively. Changes in
accounts receivable, prepaid expenses and other assets provided $55,300 and
$5,500 in cash during the six months ended June 30, 2002 and 2001, respectively,
due primarily to fluctuations in receivable collections. Changes in liabilities
owed to affiliates and third party creditors used $162,300 and provided $321,300
in cash during the six months ended June 30, 2002 and 2001, respectively,
primarily due to differences in the timing of payments.

Investing activities used $650,600 and $318,100 during the
six months ended June 30, 2002 and 2001, respectively, due primarily to capital
expenditures.

Financing activities used $3,300 during the six months ended
June 30, 2001 due to expenditures related to deferred financing costs.

INVESTING ACTIVITIES

Significant capital would be required for a comprehensive
plant and headend upgrade particularly in light of the high cost of electronics
to enable two-way service, to offer high speed cable modem Internet service and
other interactive services, as well as to increase channel capacity and allow a
greater variety of video services.

The estimated cost of all of these comprehensive upgrades
would be approximately $12.2 million (for an upgrade to 550 megahertz capacity)
and $14.6 million (for an upgrade to 870 megahertz capacity). Given the
potential and existing overbuilds that exist in Tennessee, the high cost of this
comprehensive upgrade plan, the limited funds available, and the belief that
such a plan is not economically prudent, Enstar Communications Corporation (the
Corporate General Partner) does not presently anticipate that it will proceed
with a comprehensive upgrade plan. Provided there are available funds, the
Corporate General Partner will, however, continue to make upgrades required by
franchise agreements and will continue to evaluate alternative, cost-effective
solutions to increase channel capacity, pay-per-view services, and digital
services which would enhance the value of our systems and be economically
prudent.

FINANCING ACTIVITIES

We were party to a loan agreement with Enstar Finance
Company, LLC, a subsidiary of the Corporate General Partner, that matured on
August 31, 2001. The loan facility was not extended or replaced. Cash generated
by our operations, together with available cash balances will be used to fund
capital expenditures as required by franchise authorities. However, our cash
reserves will be insufficient to fund a comprehensive upgrade program. If our
systems are not sold, we will need to rely on increased cash flow from
operations or new sources of financing in order to meet our future liquidity
requirements. There can be no assurance that such cash flow increases can be
attained, or that additional future financing will be available on terms
acceptable to us. If we are not able to attain such cash flow increases, or
obtain new sources of borrowings, we will not be able to fully complete any
comprehensive cable systems upgrades as required by franchise authorities. As a
result, the value of our systems would be lower than that of systems built to a
higher technical standard.

We believe it is critical to conserve cash to fund our future
liquidity requirements and any anticipated capital expenditures as required by
franchise authorities. Accordingly, we do not anticipate any distributions to
partners at this time.

CERTAIN TRENDS AND UNCERTAINTIES

Our franchise agreement with the City of Covington,
Tennessee ("the City") expired in 1994. By agreement with the City, we have
continued to operate the cable system in Covington and pay franchise fees to the
City on a month-to-month basis until a new franchise agreement is reached. In
March 2000, the Corporate General Partner submitted a renewal proposal to the
City on our behalf. In November 2000, the City sold municipal bonds to finance
construction of a municipally-owned cable system. The City completed the
construction project in the first quarter of 2002 and is actively competing with
us.

In July 2002, we received a letter from the City Attorney
advising us that we may not operate within the city limits and demanding we
discontinue service within thirty days. On August 7, 2002, the Corporate General
Partner filed a lawsuit on behalf of us in the United States District Court for
the Western District of Tennessee against the City, the Covington Electric
System Board of Public Utilities and Covington Cable. We allege that the City
and other defendants are unlawfully attempting to shut down our cable television
system in Covington, in order to eliminate competition to the new City-owned
cable system. We also allege that the City failed to follow the federal
statutory procedures governing the renewal of a cable television franchise and
is now attempting to shut down our cable system, without having complied with
those procedures or even formally having denied the numerous renewal proposals,
in contravention of federal law. We seek a declaration from the Court that the
City's actions are unlawful and violate the 1992 Cable Act, franchise
provisions, federal antitrust laws, state common law, the Tennessee Consumer
Protection Act and both the United States and Tennessee Constitutions. We are
also seeking a preliminary injunction against all three defendants. The
defendants have agreed to take no action against our provision of services in
Covington until the Court has ruled on the motion for preliminary
injunction.

In January 2000, the franchise authority in Bolivar,
Tennessee authorized its municipal utility to construct and operate a competing
cable system in that franchise area. We have continued to operate the cable
system in Bolivar and pay franchise fees to the franchise authority. Although
the municipal utility has not obtained funds to build a cable system, we believe
that if a competing system were built, the loss of customers would have an
adverse impact on our financial condition and results of operations. As of June
30, 2002, we had approximately 1,700 and 1,300 basic customers in the cities of
Covington and Bolivar, respectively.

If we are unsuccessful in the lawsuit, we may have to
terminate our operations. The loss of our franchise and the related loss of
customers would have a significant adverse impact on our financial condition and
operating results. No impairment charges were recorded on Brownsville's
property, plant and equipment and franchise costs, which includes all properties
served by the Brownsville headend, namely Covington, Bolivar and Brownsville.
Collectively, the properties had a carrying value of $2,043,000 at June 30,
2002. This is approximately 48% of our total investment in cable properties.

Insurance coverage is maintained for all of the cable
television properties owned or managed by Charter to cover damage to cable
distribution systems, customer connections and against business interruptions
resulting from such damage. This coverage is subject to a significant annual
deductible which applies to all of the cable television properties owned or
managed by Charter, including ours.

Approximately 79% of our customers are served by our system
in Brownsville, Tennessee and neighboring communities. Significant damage to the
system due to seasonal weather conditions or other events could have a material
adverse effect on our liquidity and cash flows. We continue to purchase
insurance coverage in amounts our management views as appropriate for all other
property, liability, automobile, workers' compensation and other insurable
risks.

Charter and our Corporate General Partner have had
communications and correspondence with representatives of certain limited
partners, and others, concerning certain Enstar partnerships of which our
Corporate General Partner is also the Corporate General Partner. While we are
not aware of any formal litigation which has been filed relating to the
communications and correspondence, or the subject matter referred to therein, it
is impossible to predict what actions may be taken in the future or what loss
contingencies may result therefrom.

Although we do not believe that the terrorist attacks on
September 11, 2001 and the related events have resulted in any material changes
to our business and operations to date, it is difficult to assess the impact
that these events, combined with the general economic slowdown, will have on
future operations. These events could result in reduced spending by customers
and advertisers, which could reduce our revenues and operating cash flow, as
well as the collectibility of accounts receivable.

RECENTLY ISSUED ACCOUNTING STANDARDS

In June 2002, the Financial Accounting Standards Board
issued SFAS No. 146, "Accounting for Costs Associated with Exit or Disposal
Activities." SFAS No. 146 addresses financial accounting and reporting for costs
associated with exit or disposal activities and nullifies Emerging Issues Task
Force Issue No. 94-3, "Liability Recognition for Certain Employee Termination
Benefits and Other Costs to Exit an Activity (including Certain Costs Incurred
in a Restructuring)." SFAS No. 146 requires that a liability for costs
associated with an exit or disposal activity be recognized when the liability is
incurred rather than when a company commits to such an activity and also
establishes fair value as the objective for initial measurement of the
liability. We will adopt SFAS No. 146 for exit or disposal activities that are
initiated after December 31, 2002. Adoption will not have a material impact on
our financial statements.

INFLATION

Certain of our expenses, such as those for wages and
benefits, equipment repair and replacement, and billing and marketing generally
increase with inflation. However, we do not believe that our financial results
have been, or will be, adversely affected by inflation in a material manner,
provided that we are able to increase our service prices periodically, of which
there can be no assurance.

PART II. OTHER INFORMATION

ITEM 6. EXHIBITS AND REPORTS ON FORM 8-K

(A)	EXHIBITS



|Exhibit Number | Description of Document                                                                                                                                                  
|-------------- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|99.1           | Certification pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (Chief Executive
Officer or equivalent thereof). *
|99.2           | Certification pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (Chief Financial
Officer or equivalent thereof). *

* filed herewith

(B)	REPORTS ON FORM 8-K

On June 14, 2002, the registrant filed a current report on
Form 8-K dated June 14, 2002 to report that the registrant had changed its
principal independent accountants.

SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the
registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the
undersigned thereunto duly authorized.

ENSTAR INCOME PROGRAM 1984-1, L.P.

By:	ENSTAR COMMUNICATIONS CORPORATION

Corporate General Partner

Date: August 14, 2002

By:	/s/ Paul E. Martin

Name:	Paul E. Martin

Title:	Senior Vice President and Corporate

Controller (Principal Financial Officer

and Principal Accounting Officer)



EXHIBIT INDEX



|Exhibit Number | Description of Document                                                                                                                                                  
|-------------- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|99.1           | Certification pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (Chief Executive
Officer or equivalent thereof). *
|99.2           | Certification pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (Chief Financial
Officer or equivalent thereof). *

* filed herewith





####