22728 Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 78 / Friday, April 22, 2011 / Notices 

context of a portfolio license. Please 

include in the discussion, how these 

factors, criteria, and evidence may vary 

depending on the industry in question 

and complainant’s relative size. 

(8) Please comment on the 

significance of whether and to what 

extent the complainant receives 

royalties under the license agreement or 

acquires other rights or benefits as a 

result of a portfolio license in assessing 

whether the complainant’s licensing 

expenses and activities constitute a 

‘‘substantial investment in [the asserted 

patent’s] exploitation.’’ 

(9) Please comment on the 

significance of whether and to what 

extent a complainant engages in 

ancillary exploitation activities that 

frequently accompany licensing efforts, 

such as development, engineering, or 

servicing of licensed articles, in 

assessing whether a complainant has 

made a ‘‘substantial investment in [the 

asserted patent’s] exploitation’’ through 

licensing. 

(10) For the parties to the 

investigation only: 

a. Please cite and discuss the specific 

evidence of record in this investigation 

supporting your position as to each of 

the above questions. 

b. Assuming the licensing efforts of 

complainant Pioneer and Discovision 

Associaties are viewed together, to what 

extent did the expenses in licensing 

Pioneer’s navigation portfolio (before 

Pioneer retained outside counsel) 

represent Pioneer’s investment in 

licensing the asserted patents? Please 

support your response with citations to 

the record. 

c. Please comment on the weight that 

should be given to documents 

concerning complainant’s licensing 

activities and expenses from which 

information has been redacted. Please 

discuss the significance, vel non, of the 

content of the redacted documents to 

the complainant’s licensing activities 

and investments in view of such 

redactions. 

Parties to the investigation and 

members of the public are invited to file 

written submissions addressing the 

questions set forth above regarding the 

domestic industry requirement of 

section 337(a)(3)(C). Opening 

submissions of the parties to the 

investigation are due no later than May 

3, 2011. A public version of these 

submissions must be filed with the 

Secretary no later than May 10, 2011. 

Reply submissions of the parties to the 

investigation are due no later than May 

17, 2011. Written submissions from 

members of the public will be accepted 

anytime on or before May 17, 2011. No 

further submissions on these issues will 

be permitted unless otherwise ordered 

by the Commission. 

Persons filing written submissions 

must file the original document and 

12 true copies thereof on or before the 

deadlines stated above with the Office 

of the Secretary. Any person desiring to 

submit a document to the Commission 

in confidence must request confidential 

treatment unless the information has 

already been granted such treatment 

during the proceedings. All such 

requests should be directed to the 

Secretary of the Commission and must 

include a full statement of the reasons 

why the Commission should grant such 

treatment. See 19 CFR 210.6. Documents 

for which confidential treatment by the 

Commission is sought will be treated 

accordingly. All nonconfidential written 

submissions will be available for public 

inspection at the Office of the Secretary 

and may be viewed on the 

Commission’s electronic docket (EDIS) 

at http://edis.usitc.gov. 

The authority for the Commission’s 

determination is contained in section 

337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as 

amended (19 U.S.C. 1337), and in 

sections 210.42–50 of the Commission’s 

Rules of Practice and Procedure (19 CFR 

210.42–50). 

By order of the Commission. 

Issued: April 18, 2011. 

James R. Holbein, 

Acting Secretary to the Commission. 

[FR Doc. 2011–9784 Filed 4–21–11; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE P 

DEPARTMENT OF LABOR 

Employee Benefits Security 

Administration 

Proposed Extension of Information 

Collection Request Submitted for 

Public Comment and 

Recommendations; Alternative Method 

of Compliance for Certain SEPs 

pursuant to 29 CFR 2520.104–49 

AGENCY: Employee Benefits Security 

Administration, Department of Labor. 

ACTION: Notice. 

SUMMARY: The Department of Labor, as 

part of its continuing effort to reduce 

paperwork and respondent burden, 

conducts a preclearance consultation 

program to provide the general public 

and Federal agencies with an 

opportunity to comment on proposed 

and continuing collections of 

information in accordance with the 

Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (PRA 

95). This program helps to ensure that 

requested data can be provided in the 

desired format, reporting burden (time 

and financial resources) is minimized, 

collection instruments are clearly 

understood, and the impact of collection 

requirements on respondents can be 

properly assessed. Currently, the 

Employee Benefits Security 

Administration is soliciting comments 

on the proposed extension of the 

collection of information included in 

the alternative method of compliance 

for certain simplified employee 

pensions regulation (29 CFR 2520.104– 

49). 

A copy of the information collection 

request (ICR) can be obtained by 

contacting the individual shown in the 

Addresses section of this notice or at 

http://www.RegInfo.gov. 

DATES: Written comments must be 

submitted to the office shown in the 

Addresses section on or before June 21, 

2011. 

ADDRESSES: G. Christopher Cosby, 

Department of Labor, Employee Benefits 

Security Administration, 200 

Constitution Avenue, NW., Washington, 

DC 20210, (202) 693–8410, FAX (202) 

693–4745 (these are not toll-free 

numbers). 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

I. Background 

Section 110 of the Employment 

Retirement Income Security Act (ERISA) 

authorizes the Secretary to prescribe 

alternative methods of compliance with 

the reporting and disclosure 

requirements of Title I of ERISA for 

pension plans. Simplified employee 

pensions (SEPs) are established in 

section 408(k) of the Internal Revenue 

Code (Code). Although SEPs are 

primarily a development of the Code 

and subject to its requirements, SEPs are 

also pension plans subject to the 

reporting and disclosure requirements 

of Title I of ERISA. 

The Department previously issued a 

regulation under the authority of section 

110 of ERISA (29 CFR 2520.104–49) that 

intended to relieve sponsors of certain 

SEPs from ERISA’s Title I reporting and 

disclosure requirements by prescribing 

an alternative method of compliance. 

These SEPs are, for purposes of this 

Notice, referred to as ‘‘non-model’’ SEPs 

because they exclude (1) those SEPs 

which are created through use of 

Internal Revenue Service (IRS) Form 

5305–SEP, and (2) those SEPs in which 

the employer limits or influences the 

employees’ choice to IRAs into which 

employers’ contributions will be made 

and on which participant withdrawals 

are prohibited. The disclosure 

requirements in this regulation were 

developed in conjunction with the 

Internal Revenue Service (IRS Notice 

mstockstill on DSKH9S0YB1PROD with NOTICES

Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 78 / Friday, April 22, 2011 / Notices 22729 

81–1). Accordingly, sponsors of ‘‘nonmodel’’ SEPs that satisfy the limited 

disclosure requirements of the 

regulation are relieved from otherwise 

applicable reporting and disclosure 

requirements under Title I of ERISA, 

including the requirements to file 

annual reports (Form 5500 Series) with 

the Department, and to furnish 

summary plan descriptions and 

summary annual reports to participants 

and beneficiaries. 

This ICR includes four separate 

disclosure requirements. First, at the 

time an employee becomes eligible to 

participate in the SEP, the administrator 

of the SEP must furnish the employee in 

writing specific and general information 

concerning the SEP; a statement on 

rates, transfers and withdrawals; and a 

statement on tax treatment. Second, the 

administrator of the SEP must furnish 

participants with information 

concerning any amendments. Third, the 

administrator must notify participants 

of any employer contributions made to 

the IRA. Fourth, in the case of a SEP 

that provides integration with Social 

Security, the administrator shall provide 

participants with statement on Social 

Security taxes and the integration 

formula used by the employer. 

II. Review Focus 

The Department of Labor 

(Department) is particularly interested 

in comments that: 

• Evaluate whether the proposed 

collection of information is necessary 

for the proper performance of the 

functions of the agency, including 

whether the information will have 

practical utility; 

• Evaluate the accuracy of the 

agency’s estimate of the burden of the 

proposed collection of information, 

including the validity of the 

methodology and assumptions used; 

• Enhance the quality, utility, and 

clarity of the information to be 

collected; and 

• Minimize the burden of the 

collection of information on those who 

are to respond, including through the 

use of appropriate automated, 

electronic, mechanical, or other 

technological collection techniques or 

other forms of information technology, 

e.g., permitting electronic submissions 

of responses. 

III. Current Actions 

The Office of Management and 

Budget’s (OMB) approval of this ICR 

will expire on July 31, 2011. After 

considering comments received in 

response to this notice, the Department 

intends to submit the ICR to OMB for 

continuing approval. No change to the 

existing ICR is proposed or made at this 

time. 

Comments submitted in response to 

this notice will be summarized and/or 

included in the request for OMB 

approval of the information collection; 

they also will become a matter of public 

record. 

Agency: Employee Benefits Security 

Administration, Department of Labor. 

Title: Alternative Method of 

Compliance for Certain SEPs pursuant 

to 29 CFR 2520.104–49. 

Type of Review: Extension of a 

currently approved collection of 

information. 

OMB Number: 1210–0034. 

Affected Public: Individuals or 

households; Business or other for-profit; 

Not-for-profit institutions. 

Respondents: 460. 

Responses: 103,590. 

Frequency of Response: On occasion. 

Average Response Time: 35 minutes. 

Estimated Total Burden Hours: 

21,227. 

Total Burden Cost (operating/ 

maintenance): $31,297. 

Dated: April 18, 2011. 

Joseph S. Piacentini, 

Director, Office of Policy and Research, 

Employee Benefits Security Administration. 

[FR Doc. 2011–9837 Filed 4–21–11; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4510–29–P 

DEPARTMENT OF LABOR 

Employment and Training 

Administration 

[TA–W–75,023] 

Chrysler Group, LLC, Power Train 

Division, Mack Avenue Engine Plant 

#1, Including On-Site Leased Workers 

From Caravan Knight, Detroit, MI; 

Amended Certification Regarding 

Eligibility To Apply for Worker 

Adjustment Assistance 

In accordance with Section 223 of the 

Trade Act of 1974, as amended (‘‘Act’’), 

19 U.S.C. 2273, the Department of Labor 

issued a Certification of Eligibility to 

Apply for Worker Adjustment 

Assistance on April 6, 2011, applicable 

to workers of Chrysler Group, LLC, 

Power Train Division, Mack Avenue 

Engine Plant #1, including on-site 

leased workers of Caravan Knight, 

Detroit, Michigan. The workers are 

engaged in the production of automotive 

engines. The notice will be published 

soon in the Federal Register. 

At the request of the State Agency, the 

Department reviewed the certification 

for workers of the subject firm. The 

review shows that on December 4, 2008, 

a certification of eligibility to apply for 

adjustment assistance was issued for all 

workers of Chrysler LLC, Mack Avenue 

Engine Plants 1 & 2, Power Train 

Division, Detroit, Michigan, separated 

from employment on or after October 

30, 2007 through December 4, 2010. The 

notice was published in the Federal 

Register on December 18, 2008 (73 FR 

77067). 

In order to avoid an overlap in worker 

group coverage, the Department is 

amending the December 16, 2009 

impact date established for 

TA–W–75,023, to read December 5, 

2010. 

The amended notice applicable to 

TA–W–75,023 is hereby issued as 

follows: 

All workers of Chrysler Group, LLC, Power 

Train Division, Mack Avenue Engine Plant 

#1, including on-site leased workers of 

Caravan Knight, Detroit, Michigan, who 

became totally or partially separated from 

employment on or after December 5, 2010, 

through April 6, 2013, and all workers in the 

group threatened with total or partial 

separation from employment on date of 

certification through two years from the date 

of certification, are eligible to apply for 

adjustment assistance under Chapter 2 of 

Title II of the Trade Act of 1974, as amended. 

Signed in Washington, DC, this 12th day of 

April 2011. 

Del Min Amy Chen, 

Certifying Officer, Office of Trade Adjustment 

Assistance. 

[FR Doc. 2011–9840 Filed 4–21–11; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4510–FN–P 

DEPARTMENT OF LABOR 

Employment and Training 

Administration 

[TA–W–74,336] 

Polaris Industries, Including On-Site 

Leased Workers From Westaff, Supply 

Technologies, Aerotek, Securitas 

Security Services, and Volt Workforce 

Solutions, Osceola, WI; Amended 

Certification Regarding Eligibility To 

Apply for Worker Adjustment 

Assistance 

In accordance with Section 223 of the 

Trade Act of 1974, as amended (‘‘Act’’), 

19 U.S.C. 2273, the Department of Labor 

issued a Certification of Eligibility to 

Apply for Worker Adjustment 

Assistance on August 26, 2010, 

applicable to workers of Polaris 

Industries, including on-site leased 

workers from Westaff, Osceola, 

Wisconsin. The workers are engaged in 

activities related to the production of 

components for recreational vehicles. 

The notice was published in the Federal 

mstockstill on DSKH9S0YB1PROD with NOTICES