alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
IB 

Union Calendar No. 465 

114TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 4361 

[Report No. 114–599] 

To amend section 3554 of title 44, United States Code, to provide for 

enhanced security of Federal information systems, and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JANUARY 11, 2016 

Mr. PALMER introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Oversight and Government Reform 

MAY 31, 2016 

Additional sponsor: Mr. Westerman 

MAY 31, 2016 

Reported with an amendment, committed to the Committee of the Whole 

House on the State of the Union, and ordered to be printed 

[Strike out all after the enacting clause and insert the part printed in italic] 

[For text of introduced bill, see copy of bill as introduced on January 11, 2016] 

mstockstill on DSK3G9T082PROD with BILLS

2 

•HR 4361 RH

A BILL 

To amend section 3554 of title 44, United States Code, 

to provide for enhanced security of Federal information 

systems, and for other purposes. 

mstockstill on DSK3G9T082PROD with BILLS

3 

•HR 4361 RH

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Federal Information 

5 Systems Safeguards Act of 2016’’. 

6 SEC. 2. AGENCY DISCRETION TO SECURE INFORMATION 

7 TECHNOLOGY AND INFORMATION SYSTEMS. 

8 Section 3554 of title 44, United States Code, is amend9 ed by adding at the end the following new subsection: 

10 ‘‘(f) AGENCY DISCRETION.—The head of each agency 

11 has the sole and exclusive authority, with respect to any 

12 information technology or information system under the 

13 control of such agency— 

14 ‘‘(1) to take any action the agency determines to 

15 be necessary to reduce or eliminate security weakness 

16 and risk, including to protect the information con17 tained in the information technology or information 

18 system; and 

19 ‘‘(2) to take any action the agency determines to 

20 be necessary to reduce or eliminate future security 

21 weakness and risk, including to protect the informa22 tion contained in the information technology or infor23 mation system.’’. 

mstockstill on DSK3G9T082PROD with BILLS

4 

•HR 4361 RH

1 SEC. 3 RULE OF CONSTRUCTION. 

2 Section 2 of this Act, which clarifies agency discretion 

3 with respect to any information technology or information 

4 system under control of such agency, does not modify exist5 ing law as enacted in the Consolidated Appropriations Act 

6 of Fiscal Year 2016, Division N – Cybersecurity Act of 

7 2015, Public Law 114–113. 

mstockstill on DSK3G9T082PROD with BILLS

mstockstill on DSK3G9T082PROD with BILLS

Union Calendar No. 465 

114TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 4361 

[Report No. 114–599] 

A BILL 

To amend section 3554 of title 44, United States 

information systems, and for other purposes. Code, to provide for enhanced security of Federal 

MAY 31, 2016 

Reported with an amendment, committed to the Comand ordered to be printed mittee of the Whole House on the State of the Union, 

mstockstill on DSK3G9T082PROD with BILLS
### §§2194b to 2196. Repealed. Pub. L. 115–254, div. F, title VI, §1464(2), Oct. 5, 2018, 132 Stat. 3513

Section 2194b, Pub. L. 87–195, pt. I, §234A, as added Pub. L. 99–204, §9(a), Dec. 23, 1985, 99 Stat. 1672; amended Pub. L. 100–461, title V, §555, Oct. 1, 1988, 102 Stat. 2268–36; Pub. L. 117–286, §4(a)(166), Dec. 27, 2022, 136 Stat. 4324, related to enhancing private political risk insurance industry.

Section 2195, Pub. L. 87–195, pt. I, §235, as added Pub. L. 91–175, pt. I, §105, Dec. 30, 1969, 83 Stat. 813; amended Pub. L. 93–189, §6(1), Dec. 17, 1973, 87 Stat. 717; Pub. L. 93–390, §2(3), Aug. 27, 1974, 88 Stat. 766; Pub. L. 95–268, §4, Apr. 24, 1978, 92 Stat. 214; Pub. L. 97–65, §5(a), (b)(1), (c), Oct. 16, 1981, 95 Stat. 1022, 1023; Pub. L. 99–204, §§9(b)(1), 10, 17(b), Dec. 23, 1985, 99 Stat. 1673, 1676; Pub. L. 100–418, title II, §2203(b), Aug. 23, 1988, 102 Stat. 1328; Pub. L. 100–461, title V, §555, Oct. 1, 1988, 102 Stat. 2268–36; Pub. L. 102–549, title I, §104, Oct. 28, 1992, 106 Stat. 3652; Pub. L. 103–392, title I, §§101–104, Oct. 22, 1994, 108 Stat. 4098; Pub. L. 104–208, div. A, title I, §101(c) [title I], Sept. 30, 1996, 110 Stat. 3009–121, 3009–123; Pub. L. 105–118, title V, §581, Nov. 26, 1997, 111 Stat. 2435; Pub. L. 106–113, div. B, §1000(a)(2) [title V, §599E], Nov. 29, 1999, 113 Stat. 1535, 1501A–132; Pub. L. 106–158, §2, Dec. 9, 1999, 113 Stat. 1745; Pub. L. 108–158, §§2, 3(a)–(d), Dec. 3, 2003, 117 Stat. 1949, related to issuing authority, direct investment authority and reserves.

Section 2196, Pub. L. 87–195, pt. I, §236, as added Pub. L. 91–175, pt. I, §105, Dec. 30, 1969, 83 Stat. 814, related to income and revenues.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date of Repeal

Repeal effective at the end of the transition period, as defined in section 9681 of this title, see section 9684 of this title.
§ 418.3335 What types of unearned income do we count? ( a ) Some of the types of unearned income we count are described in § 416.1121(a) through (g) of this chapter.
( b ) For claims filed before January 1, 2010, and redeterminations that are effective before January 1, 2010, we also count in-kind support and maintenance as unearned income. In-kind support and maintenance is any food and shelter given to you or that you receive because someone else pays for it.
[70 FR 77675, Dec. 30, 2005, as amended at 75 FR 81845, Dec. 29, 2010]
CERTIFICATE OF AMENDMENT
                                       OF
                          CERTIFICATE OF INCORPORATION
                                       OF
                                  SCOOP, INC.,
                             a Delaware corporation

     Scoop,  Inc., a corporation  organized and existing  under and by virtue of
the General Corporation Law of the State of Delaware (this "Corporation"),  DOES
HEREBY CERTIFY:

     1. The  Corporation  desires to and does hereby  amend its  Certificate  of
Incorporation  as filed with the  Secretary of State of the State of Delaware on
October 11, 1996 (the "Certificate of Incorporation"), as hereinafter provided.

     2. The  Corporation  filed a Petition for Bankruptcy with the United States
Bankruptcy Court, Central District of California, Santa Ana Division on July 31,
1998; Case Number SA 98-20799 RA.

     3. Provision for making this Amendment of the Certificate of  Incorporation
is  contained  in the Order  Confirming  Debtor's  Second  and  Amended  Plan of
Organization which was entered on October 15, 1999.

     3. The Certificate of  Incorporation  of this Corporation is hereby amended
in accordance with the provisions of Section 303 of the General  Corporation Law
of the State of Delaware by changing Article Fourth thereof so that, as amended,
Article Fourth shall read in its entirety as follows:

     "FOURTH:  The Corporation shall have authority to issue 105,000,000  shares
of stock, consisting of 100,000,000 shares of Common Stock, par value $0.001 per
share, and 5,000,000 shares of Preferred Stock, par value $0.001 per share."


     IN  WITNESS  WHEREOF,  the  undersigned  has  caused  this  Certificate  of
Amendment to be duly executed as of the 20th day of October, 1999.


                                         SCOOP, INC.,
                                         a Delaware corporation


                                         By: /s/ Rand Bleimeister
                                             -----------------------------------
                                             Rand Bleimeister, President
§ 618.250 Amendments of certifications. ( a ) *Reasons for amendments.* A Certifying Officer may amend a certification. The Department retains the authority to amend a certification without a petition, where it has determined that an amendment is appropriate. Amendments must not extend the impact date more than 1 year prior to the petition date unless there is a statutory exception, as described in § 618.235(a)(1)(ii). Reasons for amendments include, but are not limited to: ( 1 ) Identifying an ownership change affecting the applicable firm;
( 2 ) Correcting technical errors; or
( 3 ) Clarifying the identification of the worker group.
( b ) *Petition filing.* Amendments must be requested through the regular petition process described in § 618.205.
( c ) *Notification of amendment.* The Department will publish the amended certification in the Federal Register and on the Department's website. The Department will also notify the affected States and the State must notify any additional certified trade-affected workers, as required by § 618.820.
<PAGE>   1

                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.1

                        [ARTHUR ANDERSEN LLP LETTERHEAD]

                   CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS

     As independent public accountants, we hereby consent to the incorporation
by reference in this registration statement of our report dated February 4, 1999
included in SEMCO Energy, Inc.'s Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 1998,
and to all references to our Firm included in this registration statement.

                                                         /s/ Arthur Andersen LLP

Detroit, Michigan,
 June 11, 1999.
<PAGE>   2

                        [ARTHUR ANDERSEN LLP LETTERHEAD]

To SEMCO Energy, Inc.:

     We are aware that SEMCO Energy, Inc. has incorporated by reference in this
registration statement its Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 1999, which
includes our report dated April 20, 1999, covering the unaudited interim
financial information contained therein. Pursuant to Regulation C of the
Securities Act of 1933, that report is not considered a part of the registration
statement prepared or certified by our Firm or a report prepared or certified by
our Firm within the meaning of Sections 7 and 11 of the Act.

                                                         /s/ Arthur Andersen LLP

Detroit, Michigan,
 June 11, 1999.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY ELEV

 1,006.88

 1,006.73

 1,006.64

 1,006.48

 1,006.38

 1,006.26

 1,006.16

 1,006.00

 1,005.92

 1,006.04

 1,006.08

 1,006.14

 1,006.24

 1,005.97

 1,005.77

 1,005.73

 1,005.62

 1,005.42

 1,005.34

 1,005.20

 1,005.08

 1,005.04

 1,004.92

 1,004.77

 1,004.70

 1,004.64

 1,004.62

 1,004.81

 1,004.86

 1,005.09

 1,005.12

 2,980.8

 2,977.5

 2,975.4

 2,971.8

 2,969.6

 2,966.9

 2,964.6

 2,961.0

 2,959.3

 2,961.9

 2,962.8

 2,964.2

 2,966.4

 2,960.4

 2,955.9

 2,955.0

 2,952.5

 2,948.1

 2,946.3

 2,943.1

 2,940.5

 2,939.6

 2,936.9

 2,933.6

 2,932.0

 2,930.7

 2,930.2

 2,934.4

 2,935.6

 2,940.7

 2,941.4

STORAGE

-4.3

-3.4

-2.0

-3.6

-2.3

-2.7

-2.3

-3.6

-1.8

+2.7

+0.9

+1.4

+2.3

-6.1

-4.5

-0.9

-2.5

-4.5

-1.8

-3.1

-2.7

-0.9

-2.7

-3.3

-1.6

-1.3

-0.4

+4.2

+1.1

+5.1

+0.7

CHANGE

 3,262

 3,793

 4,437

 3,850

 4,901

 4,262

 4,409

 3,484

 4,500

 6,338

 5,841

 5,340

 6,202

 2,979

 3,915

 5,716

 5,105

 3,767

 4,715

 3,826

 4,336

 4,314

 3,992

 3,680

 4,234

 4,318

 5,122

 6,703

 6,448

 7,327

 5,753

INFLOW

 5,255

 5,283

 5,246

 5,465

 5,936

 5,425

 5,365

 5,134

 5,138

 4,975

 5,387

 4,659

 4,923

 5,921

 6,080

 6,075

 6,274

 5,945

 5,518

 5,347

 5,670

 4,673

 5,282

 5,278

 4,968

 4,991

 5,288

 4,524

 5,861

 4,720

 5,415

POWER

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

SPILL

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

OUTLET

 166

 212

 212

 199

 99

 198

 178

 165

 264

 7

 0

 0

 145

 119

 92

 92

 72

 79

 99

 59

 20

 92

 59

 85

 52

 0

 59

 46

 26

 20

 0

C.F.S.

 .25

 .32

 .32

 .30

 .15

 .30

 .27

 .25

 .40

 .01

 .00

 .00

 .22

 .18

 .14

 .14

 .11

 .12

 .15

 .09

 .03

 .14

 .09

 .13

 .08

 .00

 .09

 .07

 .04

 .03

 .00

INCHES

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .27

 .35

 .03

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .23

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 1.27

 .01

 .35

 .98

 .76

 .01

PRECIP

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

OCTOBER 2000 SHASTA LAKE DAILY OPERATIONS RUN DATE: November 29, 2000

IN LAKE

EVAPORATION

INCHES

C.F.S.

COMPUTED*

1000 ACRE-FEET

RELEASE - C.F.S.

RIVER

TOTALS -43.9 146,869 166,021 0 0 2,916 4.42 4.26

ACRE-FEET -43,900 291,315 329,303 0 0 5,784

COMMENTS:

* COMPUTED INFLOW IS THE SUM OF CHANGE IN STORAGE, RELEASES AND EVAPORATION.

SUMMARY

RELEASE (ACRE-FEET)

POWER 329,303

SPILL 0

OUTLET

TOTAL

 0

 329,303

PRECIPITATION

THIS MONTH =

TO DATE =

 4.26

JULY 1, 2000 7.89

 2,985.1

Table 3
#### § 603.3 What is the purpose and scope of this subpart?

This subpart implements the basic confidentiality requirement derived from Section 303(a)(1), SSA, and the disclosure requirements of Sections 303(a)(7), (c)(1), (d), (e), (h), and (i), SSA, and Section 3304(a)(16), Federal Unemployment Tax Act (FUTA). This subpart also establishes uniform minimum requirements for the payment of costs, safeguards, and data-sharing agreements when UC information is disclosed, and for conformity and substantial compliance with this proposed rule. This subpart applies to States and State UC agencies, as defined in § 603.2(f) and (g), respectively.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<RESTATED> 
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAY-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               FEB-28-1997
<CASH>                                      17,991,910
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                               10,960,599
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                  6,751,972
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            37,369,384
<PP&E>                                       9,042,562
<DEPRECIATION>                               3,825,341
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              56,696,794
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        5,008,775
<BONDS>                                     11,080,937
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       807,848
<OTHER-SE>                                  39,335,974
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                56,696,794
<SALES>                                     25,953,819
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            25,953,819
<CGS>                                       10,591,331
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               10,591,331
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                            12,951,644
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             243,361
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              2,491,595
<INCOME-TAX>                                 1,067,482
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          1,424,113
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 1,424,113
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .18
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .17
        

</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                                          <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                 3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                             DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                                  MAR-31-1997
<CASH>                                        1,581
<SECURITIES>                                  0
<RECEIVABLES>                                 3,395
<ALLOWANCES>                                  982
<INVENTORY>                                   0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                              1,668
<PP&E>                                        0
<DEPRECIATION>                                0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                11,432
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                         284
<BONDS>                                       3,386
<COMMON>                                      0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                         0
<PREFERRED>                                   0
<OTHER-SE>                                    7,473
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                  11,432
<SALES>                                       0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                              293
<CGS>                                         0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                 0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                              0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                              0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                            103
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               41
<INCOME-TAX>                                  0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           41
<DISCONTINUED>                                0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                               0
<CHANGES>                                     0
<NET-INCOME>                                  41
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                 1.06
<EPS-DILUTED>                                 1.06
        

</TABLE>
(No. 6908

#### Thomas A. Rose, Claimant, *vs.*State of Illinois, Secretary of State, Respondent.

*Opinion filed May 8, 1973.*

Thomas A. Rose, Claimant, pro se.

William J. Scott, Attorney General; Saul R. Wexler, Assistant Attorney General, for Respondent.

Per Curiam.
### §2708a. Award of Thomas Jefferson Star for Foreign Service

#### (a) Authority to award

The President, upon the recommendation of the Secretary, may award a Thomas Jefferson Star for Foreign Service to any member of the Foreign Service or any other civilian employee of the Government of the United States who, while employed at, or assigned permanently or temporarily to, an official mission overseas or while traveling abroad on official business, incurred a wound or other injury or an illness (whether or not the wound, other injury, or illness resulted in death)—

(1) as the person was performing official duties;

(2) as the person was on the premises of a United States mission abroad; or

(3) by reason of the person's status as a United States Government employee.

#### (b) Selection criteria

The Secretary shall prescribe the procedures for identifying and considering persons eligible for award of a Thomas Jefferson Star for Foreign Service and for selecting the persons to be recommended for the award.

#### (c) Award in the event of death

If a person selected for award of a Thomas Jefferson Star for Foreign Service dies before being presented the award, the award may be made and the star presented to the person's family or to the person's representative, as designated by the President.

#### (d) Form of award

The Secretary shall prescribe the design of the Thomas Jefferson Star for Foreign Service. The award may not include a stipend or any other cash payment.

#### (e) Funding

Any expenses incurred in awarding a person a Thomas Jefferson Star for Foreign Service may be paid out of appropriations available at the time of the award for personnel of the department or agency of the United States Government in which the person was employed when the person incurred the wound, injury, or illness upon which the award is based.

(Aug. 1, 1956, ch. 841, title I, §36A, as added Pub. L. 106–113, div. B, §1000(a)(7) [div. A, title III, §321], Nov. 29, 1999, 113 Stat. 1536, 1501A–436; amended Pub. L. 107–228, div. A, title III, §311, Sept. 30, 2002, 116 Stat. 1377.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

2002—Pub. L. 107–228 substituted "Thomas Jefferson Star for Foreign Service" for "Foreign Service star" in section catchline and wherever appearing in text.
#### Rafael Jimenez RESENDIZ, Petitioner, v. Alberto R. GONZALES, Attorney General, Respondent.

No. 04-75493.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted Feb. 13, 2006.*

Decided Feb. 22, 2006.

Rafael Jimenez Resendiz, Ontario, CA, pro se.

CAC-Distriet Counsel, Esq., Office of the District Counsel, Department of Homeland Security, Los Angeles, CA, Ronald E. LeFevre, Chief Counsel, Office of the District Counsel, Department of Homeland Security, San Francisco, CA, Linda S. Wendtland, Esq., Ann Carroll Varnon, Esq., U.S. Department of Justice, Civil Div./Office of Immigration Lit., Washington, DC, for Respondent.

Before: FERNANDEZ, RYMER, and BYBEE, Circuit Judges.

*

 The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. *See*Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

MEMORANDUM **

Rafael Jimenez Resendiz, a native and citizen of Mexico, petitions pro se for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order affirming an immigration judge’s (“IJ”) decision denying his applica*817tion for asylum and 'withholding of removal. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 8 U.S.C. § 1252(a)(1). We review factual determinations for substantial evidence, and legal determinations de novo. *Abebe v. Gonzales,*482 F.3d 1037, 1039-40 (9th Cir.2005) (en banc). We deny the petition for review.

In concluding that changed country conditions in Mexico rebutted Jimenez Resendiz’s fear of future persecution, the agency considered political shifts reported in the State Department Country Report, Jimenez Resendiz’s level of involvement with the PRD (Party of Revolutionary Democracy), and the length of time he had been out of the country since he was politically active. Substantial evidence therefore supports the agency’s “individualized determination” that “the changed conditions reported in the Country Report will affect [Jimenez Resendiz’s] specific situation.” *Marcos v. Gonzales,*410 F.3d 1112, 1121 (9th Cir.2005).

Furthermore, although the past persecution Jimenez Resendiz suffered was serious, it was not so extreme as to justify a special grant of asylum based on humanitarian grounds. *See Acewicz v. INS,*984 F.2d 1056, 1062 (9th Cir.1993).

Jimenez Resendiz’s contention that the BIA’s summary affirmance is a violation of due process is foreclosed by *Falcon Carriche v. Ashcroft,*350 F.3d 845, 849-52 (9th Cir .2003).

Jimenez Resendiz’s remaining contentions lack merit.

The voluntary departure period was stayed, and that stay will expire upon issuanee of the mandate. *See Desta v. Ashcroft,*365 F.3d 741 (9th Cir.2004).

PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED

**

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
Editorial Note on Part 416
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 416 appear at 68 FR 53509, Sept. 11, 2003.

§ 416.1489 Good cause for reopening. ( a ) We will find that there is good cause to reopen a determination or decision if— ( 1 ) New and material evidence is furnished;
( 2 ) A clerical error was made; or
( 3 ) The evidence that was considered in making the determination or decision clearly shows on its face that an error was made.
( b ) We will not find good cause to reopen your case if the only reason for reopening is a change of legal interpretation or administrative ruling upon which the determination or decision was made.