alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 411.310 How does an entity other than a State VR agency apply to be an EN and who will determine whether an entity qualifies as an EN? ( a ) An entity other than a State VR agency applies by responding to our Request for Proposal (RFP), which we published in the Commerce Business Daily and which is available online through the Federal government's electronic posting system (*http://www.eps.gov*). This RFP also is available through SSA's website, *http://www.ssa.gov/work .* Since recruitment of ENs will be an ongoing process, the RFP is open and continuous. The entity must respond in a format prescribed in the RFP announcement. In its response, the entity must assure SSA that it is qualified to provide employment services, vocational rehabilitation services, or other support services to disabled beneficiaries, either directly or through arrangements with other entities.
( b ) The PM will solicit service providers and other qualified entities to respond to the RFP on an ongoing basis. (See § 411.115(k) for a definition of the PM.) The PM will conduct a preliminary review of responses to the RFP from applicants located in the PM's service delivery area and make recommendations to the Commissioner regarding selection. The Commissioner will decide which applicants will be approved to serve as ENs under the program.
( c ) State VR agencies must comply with the requirements in subpart F of this part to participate as an EN in the Ticket to Work program. (See §§ 411.360ff).
( d ) One-stop delivery systems established under subtitle B of title I of the Workforce Investment Act of 1998 (29 U.S.C. 2811 *et seq.*) may participate in the Ticket to Work program as ENs and do not need to respond to the RFP. However, in order to participate in the Ticket to Work program, the one-stop delivery system must enter into an agreement with the Commissioner to be an EN and must maintain compliance with general and specific selection criteria as described in § 411.315 in order to remain an EN.
( e ) Organizations administering Vocational Rehabilitation Services Projects for American Indians with Disabilities authorized under section 121 of part C of title I of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as amended (29 U.S.C. 741), may participate in the Ticket to Work program as ENs and do not need to respond to the RFP. However, in order to participate in the Ticket to Work program, the organization administering the project must enter into an agreement with the Commissioner to be an EN and must maintain compliance with general and specific selection criteria as described in § 411.315 in order to remain an EN.
[66 FR 67420, Dec. 28, 2001, as amended at 73 FR 29344, May 20, 2008]
#### § 411.581 Can an EN receive milestone and outcome payments for months after a beneficiary takes his or her ticket out of assignment?

Yes. If an individual whose ticket is assigned to an EN (or State VR agency acting as an EN) takes his or her ticket out of assignment (see § 411.145), the EN (or State VR agency) can receive payments under its elected payment system for milestones or outcome payment months that occur after the ticket is taken out of assignment, provided the ticket has not terminated for any of the reasons listed in § 411.155. The PM will make a determination about eligibility for a payment based upon the contribution of services provided by an EN toward the achievement of the outcome or milestones. See § 411.560 for situations in which payment may be made to more than one EN or State VR agency based on the same milestone or outcome.

[73 FR 29351, May 20, 2008]
---

Exhibit 99.8

March 27, 2012

CONSENT OF VELASQUEZ SPRING

United States Securities and Exchange Commission

Gentlemen:

In connection with Silver Wheaton Corp.s (the Company)
Annual Report on Form 40-F for the year ended December 31, 2011 (the Annual
Report), I, Velasquez Spring, P.Eng., Senior Geologist of Watts, Griffis and
McOuat Limited, hereby consent to the inclusion in, or incorporation by
reference into, the Annual Report and the Companys Registration Statements on
Form S-8 (File No. 333-128128) and Form F-10 (File No. 333-167567), of the
following:

| | 1. | Resource and reserve estimates of the San Dimas Mines;
      and                                                                                                          
| | -- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| | 2. | Technical report dated March 14, 2011, entitled
      Technical Report on the Tayoltita, Santa Rita and San Antonio Mines,
      Durango Mexico for Silver Wheaton Corp.

Yours truly,

/s/ Velasquez Spring

Velasquez Spring, P.Eng
  Senior Geologist, 
  Watts, Griffis and McOuat Limited

---
Editorial Note on Part 416
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 416 appear at 68 FR 53509, Sept. 11, 2003.

§ 416.1493 Effect of revised determination or decision. A revised determination or decision is binding unless— ( a ) You or a party to the revised determination file a written request for a reconsideration or a hearing;
( b ) You or another party to the revised decision file, as appropriate, a request for review by the Appeals Council or a hearing;
( c ) The Appeals Council reviews the revised decision; or
( d ) The revised determination or decision is further revised.
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

NO. 03-13-00706-CR

Bruce Vincent Felder, Appellant

v.

The State of Texas, Appellee

FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF HAYS COUNTY, 22ND JUDICIAL DISTRICT

NO. CR-12-0739, THE HONORABLE WILLIAM R. HENRY, JUDGE PRESIDING

M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N

Appellant Bruce Vincent Felder was convicted by a jury of criminal trespass of a

habitation. See Tex. Penal Code § 30.05. The trial court assessed appellant’s punishment at 1

confinement in the county jail for one year, but suspended imposition of the sentence and placed

appellant on community supervision for two years. See Tex. Code Crim. Proc. art. 42.12, § 3.

Appellant’s court-appointed attorney has filed a motion to withdraw supported by a

brief concluding that the appeal in this case is frivolous and without merit. The brief meets the

requirements of Anders v. California by presenting a professional evaluation of the record

demonstrating why there are no arguable grounds to be advanced. See Anders v. California,

Appellant was charged by indictment with the felony offense of burglary of a habitation 1

with intent to commit assault. See Tex. Penal Code § 30.02(a)(1). However, the jury found

appellant guilty of the lesser-included offense of criminal trespass of a habitation.
386 U.S. 738, 744 (1967); Garner v. State, 300 S.W.3d 763, 766 (Tex. Crim. App. 2009); see also

Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75, 81–82 (1988).

Appellant’s counsel has represented to this Court that he provided copies of the

motion and brief to appellant along with a letter advising appellant of his right to examine the

appellate record and file a pro se brief. See Anders, 386 U.S. at 744; Garner, 300 S.W.3d at 766. 

No pro se brief or other written response has been filed.

We have conducted an independent review of the record, including appellate

counsel’s brief and the trial proceeding, and find no reversible error. See Anders, 386 U.S. at 744;

Garner, 300 S.W.3d at 766; Bledsoe v. State, 178 S.W.3d 824, 826–27 (Tex. Crim. App. 2005). We

agree with counsel that the record presents no arguably meritorious grounds for review and the

appeal is frivolous. Counsel’s motion to withdraw is granted. The judgment of conviction

is affirmed.

__________________________________________

J. Woodfin Jones, Chief Justice

Before Chief Justice Jones, Justices Rose and Goodwin

Affirmed

Filed: October 8, 2014

Do Not Publish

2
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except

under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

October 25, 2006

Charles R. Fulbruge III

Clerk

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 05-20690

Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

CRUZ JOEL GARCIA, JR.,

Defendant-Appellant.

--------------------

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Texas

USDC No. 4:05-CR-88-ALL

--------------------

Before JOLLY, DeMOSS, and STEWART, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Cruz Joel Garcia, Jr., appeals his guilty-plea conviction

for possession of a firearm by a convicted felon in violation of

18 U.S.C. § 922(g)(1).

Garcia contends that § 922(g)(1) is unconstitutional on its

face because it does not require a substantial effect on

interstate or foreign commerce. Alternatively, he contends that

the factual basis for his plea was insufficient because the mere

movement of a firearm from one state or country to another at

some undetermined time in the past does not constitute a
No. 05-20690

-2-

substantial effect on interstate or foreign commerce. Garcia

raises these arguments solely to preserve them for possible

Supreme Court review. As he acknowledges, they are foreclosed by

existing Fifth Circuit precedent. See United States v. Guidry,

406 F.3d 314, 318-19 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 126 S. Ct. 190

(2005); United States v. Daugherty, 264 F.3d 513, 518 (5th Cir.

2001).

AFFIRMED.
### §254e. Liability insurance for members of mission

#### (a) Compliance with regulations

Each mission, members of the mission and their families, and individuals described in section 19 of the Convention on Privileges and Immunities of the United Nations of February 13, 1946, shall comply with any requirement imposed by the regulations promulgated by the Director of the Office of Foreign Missions in the Department of State pursuant to subsection (b).

#### (b) Establishment by regulation of liability insurance requirements

The Director of the Office of Foreign Missions shall, by regulation, establish liability insurance requirements which can reasonably be expected to afford adequate compensation to victims and which are to be met by each mission, members of the mission and their families, and individuals described in section 19 of the Convention on Privileges and Immunities of the United Nations of February 13, 1946, relating to risks arising from the operation in the United States of any motor vehicle, vessel, or aircraft.

#### (c) Enforcement of liability insurance requirements

The Director of the Office of Foreign Missions shall take such steps as he may deem necessary to insure that each mission, members of the mission and their families, and individuals described in section 19 of the Convention on Privileges and Immunities of the United Nations of February 13, 1946, who operate motor vehicles, vessels, or aircraft in the United States comply with the requirements established pursuant to subsection (b).

(Pub. L. 95–393, §6, Sept. 30, 1978, 92 Stat. 809; Pub. L. 98–164, title VI, §602, Nov. 22, 1983, 97 Stat. 1042.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

1983—Subsec. (a). Pub. L. 98–164, §602(1), substituted "Director of the Office of Foreign Missions in the Department of State" for "President".

Subsec. (b). Pub. L. 98–164, §602(2), inserted provision respecting adequate compensation to victims, and substituted reference to Director for reference to President.

Subsec. (c). Pub. L. 98–164, §602(3), substituted reference to Director for reference to President.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date

Section effective at end of ninety-day period beginning on Sept. 30, 1978, see section 9 of Pub. L. 95–393, set out as a note under section 254a of this title.

#### Authority of Secretary of State

Except as otherwise provided, Secretary of State to have and exercise any authority vested by law in any official or office of Department of State and references to such officials or offices deemed to refer to Secretary of State or Department of State, as appropriate, see section 2651a of this title and section 161(d) of Pub. L. 103–236, set out as a note under section 2651a of this title.
Decision IX/6: Critical-use exemptions for methyl bromide

1. To apply the following criteria and procedure in assessing a critical methyl bromide use for the purposes of control measures in Article 2 of the Protocol:

(a) That a use of methyl bromide should qualif y as “critical” only if the nominating Party

determines that:

(i) The specific use is critical because the lack of availability of methyl bromide for that use would result in significant market disruption; and

(ii) There are no technically and economically feasible alternatives or substitutes available to the user that are acceptabl e from the standpoint of environment and health and are suitable to the crops and circumstances of the nomination,”

(b) That production and consumption, if any , of methyl bromide for critical uses should be permitted only if:

(i) All technically and economically feasible steps have been taken to minimize the critical use and any associated emission of methyl bromide;

(ii) Methyl bromide is not available in sufficient quantity and quality from existing stocks of banked or recycled methyl bromide, also bearing in mind the developing countries’ need for methyl bromide;

(iii) It is demonstrated that an appropriate effort is being made to evaluate, commercialize and secure national regulatory approval of alternatives and substitutes, taking into consideration the circumstances of the particular nomination and the special needs of Article 5 Parties, including lack of financial and expert resources, institutional capacity, and information. Non-Article 5

Parties must demonstrate that research programmes are in place to develop and deploy alternatives and substitutes. Ar ticle 5 Parties must demonstrate that feasible alternatives shall be adopted as soon as they are confirmed as suitable to the Party’s specific conditions and/or that they have applied to the Multilateral Fund or other sources for assistance in identifying, evaluating, adapting, and demonstrating such options;

2. To request the Technology and Economic A ssessment Panel to review nominations and make recommendations based on the criteria established in paragraphs 1 (a) (ii) and 1 (b) of the present decision;3. That the present decision will apply to Pa rties operating under Article 5 and Parties not so operating only after the phase-out date applicable to those Parties;
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                                            9
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                                 MAR-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                                   JUN-30-1997
<CASH>                                         14,705
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                         151,231
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                               14,720
<TRADING-ASSETS>                               0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                    58,993
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                         58,993
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                           58,993
<LOANS>                                        141,299
<ALLOWANCE>                                    2,120
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 238,132
<DEPOSITS>                                     209,938
<SHORT-TERM>                                   928
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                            1,635
<LONG-TERM>                                    0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       13
<OTHER-SE>                                     23,020
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>                 238,132
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                3,568
<INTEREST-INVEST>                              931
<INTEREST-OTHER>                               167
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                               4,666
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                             1,336
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             1,371
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                          3,295
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                  6
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                             (16)
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                3,128
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                961
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                     0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   961
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  .76
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  .76
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                 6.23
<LOANS-NON>                                    1,122
<LOANS-PAST>                                   0
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                               0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                4,007
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                               0
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                  417
<RECOVERIES>                                   1
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                              2,120
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                           2,120
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                            0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                        1,556
        


</TABLE>
§ 408.228 When do we consider you to be residing outside the United States? ( a ) *Effect of residency on SVB eligibility.* You can be paid SVB only for those months in which you are residing outside the United States but you can not be paid for a month that is earlier than the month in which you filed your application for SVB. You are residing outside the United States in a month only if you reside outside the United States on the first day of that month. For SVB purposes, you can be a resident of only one country at a time. You cannot, for example, maintain a residence in the United States and a residence outside the United States at the same time.
( b ) *Definition of residing outside the United States.* We consider you to be residing outside the United States if you: ( 1 ) Have established an actual dwelling place outside the United States; and
( 2 ) Intend to continue to live outside the United States.
( c ) *When we will assume you intend to continue living outside the United States.* If you tell us, or the evidence shows, that you intend to reside outside the United States for at least 6 months, we will assume you meet the intent requirement in paragraph (b)(2) of this section. Otherwise we will assume, absent convincing evidence to the contrary, that your stay is temporary and that you are not residing outside the United States.
Document

FIRST AMENDMENT TO REVOLVING CREDIT LOAN AGREEMENT
THIS FIRST AMENDMENT TO REVOLVING CREDIT LOAN AGREEMENT (this “Amendment”) is entered into as of August 14, 2018, by and between CUMBERLAND PHARMACEUTICALS INC., a Tennessee corporation (the “Borrower”), and PINNACLE BANK, a Tennessee banking corporation (the “Lender”).
RECITALS:
A.The Borrower and the Lender entered into that certain Revolving Credit Loan Agreement (the “Loan Agreement”) dated as of July 31, 2017. Capitalized terms not otherwise defined therein have the same meaning as set forth in the Loan Agreement.
B. The Borrower and the Lender desire to amend the Loan Agreement as provided herein.
NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the premises and for other good and valuable consideration, the receipt and adequacy of which is hereby acknowledged, the parties hereto agree as follows:
1. Section 6.7 of the Loan Agreement is hereby amended and restated as follows: 
6.7 Funded Debt Ratio and Tangible Capital Ratio. Permit both (i) the Funded Debt Ratio of the Borrower as calculated for the Borrower and its Subsidiaries at the end of each fiscal quarter on a rolling four quarter basis to exceed 2.50 to 1.00, and (ii) the Funded Debt to Tangible Capital Ratio of the Borrower as calculated for the Borrower and its Subsidiaries to exceed forty percent (40%).  For clarification, if the Borrower maintains compliance with either of the above required calculations, then the Borrower shall be in compliance with this Section 6.7 for the applicable period.
2. The following new definitions are hereby added to Section 9.1 of the Loan Agreement: 
“Funded Debt to Tangible Capital Ratio” means the ratio, expressed as a percentage, of Funded Debt divided by Tangible Capital. 
“Tangible Capital” means the amount equal to total shareholders’ equity, plus Funded Debt, less the value of intangible assets, all of the foregoing to be determined in accordance with the financial statements and reports provided to Lender, which are to be prepared in accordance with GAAP. 
3. The Loan Agreement is not amended in any other respect.
4. The Borrower reaffirms the terms and provisions of the Loan Agreement, along with the other Loan Documents, and the Borrower agrees that such terms and provisions are valid and binding, enforceable in accordance with its terms and provisions, subject to no defense, counterclaim, or objection.
[signatures commence on following page]













ENTERED INTO as of the date first written above.
						
	BORROWER: 
 
CUMBERLAND PHARMACEUTICALS INC. 
 


	
	By:
	/s/ A.J. Kazimi



A.J. Kazimi, 
Chairman and Chief Executive Officer
 


						
	LENDER: 
 
PINNACLE BANK 
 


	
	By:
	/s/ Tim Bewley



Tim Bewley,
Senior Vice President






[Signature Page to First Amendment to Revolving Credit Loan Agreement]
Exhibit 3.27(a)

IC MEDIA HOLDING COMPANY LIMITED

(the Company)

CERTIFIED TRUE COPY EXTRACT OF A RESOLUTION ADOPTED BY THE

DIRECTORS PURSUANT TO THE ARTICLES OF ASSOCIATION

OF THE COMPANY ON THE 31stDAY OF AUGUST, 2005

AMENDMENT TO MEMORANDUM AND ARTICLES OF ASSOCIATION

WHEREAS pursuant to the provisions of the Companys Memorandum of
Association, the Company may amend its Memorandum of Association by a resolution of directors.

RESOLVED:



|1. | That the name of the Company be changed to MagnaChip Semiconductor Holding Company Limited.
|-- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|2. | That Clause 1 of the Companys Memorandum of Association be deleted in its entirety and replaced with the following:
|-- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

NAME

The name of the Company
is MagnaChip Semiconductor Holding Company Limited



|3. | That copies of the foregoing resolutions be certified by Messrs. Harney Westwood & Riegels and filed at the Registry of Companies, Road Town, Tortola.
|-- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



LOGOHARNEY WESTWOOD & RIEGELS