alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

DAY HIGH

 293

 276

 302

 274

 254

 217

 202

 214

 250

 320

 319

 308

 311

 305

 277

 269

 265

 237

 247

 270

 262

 222

 226

 210

 260

 234

 221

 204

 185

 194

 180

 183

 183

 184

 183

 179

 182

 182

 182

 181

 181

 179

 178

 179

 181

 186

 186

 188

 186

 184

 180

 178

 178

 177

 178

 176

 175

 176

 175

 176

 202

 202

 203

 202

 196

 189

 187

 189

 192

 203

 199

 197

 196

 194

 199

 200

 200

 198

 199

 204

 198

 187

 186

 185

 191

 186

 183

 181

 180

 181

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

SEPTEMBER 2013 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: February 20, 2014

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

RIO VISTA ON THE SACRAMENTO RIVER
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 98-7804

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, versus JEFFREY MAURICE YOUNG-BEY, Defendant - Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Leonie M. Brinkema, District Judge. (CR-95-148, CA-97-2027-A) Submitted: February 11, 1999 Decided: February 25, 1999 Before ERVIN, NIEMEYER, and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.Jeffrey Maurice Young-Bey, Appellant Pro Se. Justin Michael Dempsey, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Alexandria, Virginia, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).* Although two of the district court’s orders are marked as “filed” on November 24 and November 30, 1998, the district court’s records show that they were entered on the docket sheet on November 25 and December 1, 1998. Pursuant to Rules 58 and 79(a) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, it is the date that the orders were entered on the docket sheet that we take as the effective date of the district court’s decision. See Wilson v. Murray , 806 F.2d 1232, 1234-35 (4th Cir. 1986). 2 PER CURIAM: Jeffrey Maurice Young-Bey seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying his motion filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West 1994& Supp. 1998), and his motions for reconsideration. We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find noreversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. See United States v. Young-Bey, Nos. CR-95-148; CA-97-2027- A (E.D. Va. Nov. 12, Nov. 25 & Dec. 1, 1998). * We dispense withoral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
**Exhibit 15.2**

**Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm**

The Board of Directors 

China MedicalTechnologies, Inc.: 

We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements on Form F-3 (No.333-152937) and Form S-8 (No. 333-138954) of China Medical Technologies, Inc. of our report dated September 8, 2010 relating to the consolidated financial statements and the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting,which appears in this Form 20-F. 

/s/ PricewaterhouseCoopers Zhong Tian CPAs Limited Company 

Beijing, People’s Republic of China 

September 8, 2010
ARMED SERVICES BOARD OF CONTRACT APPEALS

Appeal of

- )

)

Cherokee 8A Group, Inc. ) ASBCA No. 63237

)

Under Contract No. W912DS

- 16

- C

- 0005 )

APPEARANCE FOR THE APPELLANT : John Manfredonia, Esq.

Manfredonia Law Offices, LLC

Cresskill, NJ

APPEARANCES FOR THE GOVERNMENT: Michael P. Goodman, Esq.

Engineer Chief Trial Attorney

Rita Fang, Esq.

Lorraine C. Lee, Esq.

Trial Attorneys

U.S. Army Engineer District, New York

ORDER OF DISMISSAL

The dispute has been settled. The appeal is dismissed with prejudice.

Dated: September 20, 2022

I certify that the foregoing is a true copy of the Order of Dismissal of the Armed

Services Board of Contract Appeals in ASBCA No. 63237

, Appeal of Cherokee 8A

Group, Inc. , rendered in conformance with the Board’s Charter.

Dated: September 20, 2022 JOHN J. THRASHER

Administrative Judge

Chairman

Armed Services Board

of Contract Appeals

PAULLA K. GATES

- LEWIS

Recorder, Armed Services

Board of Contract Appeals
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

DAY ELEV

 582.93

 582.93

 582.76

 584.71

 585.09

 583.68

 581.83

 581.35

 582.26

 580.76

 585.43

 584.91

 583.54

 581.57

 580.90

 580.94

 580.69

 582.41

 583.07

 585.14

 583.85

 584.87

 582.86

 579.36

 581.55

 577.78

 575.69

 578.27

 578.48

 578.42

 21,241

 21,241

 21,140

 22,328

 22,564

 21,696

 20,586

 20,305

 20,841

 19,962

 22,777

 22,451

 21,611

 20,434

 20,042

 20,065

 19,921

 20,931

 21,325

 22,595

 21,799

 22,427

 21,199

 19,164

 20,422

 18,291

 17,172

 18,559

 18,675

 18,642

STORAGE

+918

+0

-101

+1,188

+236

-868

-1,110

-281

+536

-879

+2,815

-326

-840

-1,177

-392

+23

-144

+1,010

+394

+1,270

-796

+628

-1,228

-2,035

+1,258

-2,131

-1,119

+1,387

+116

-33

CHANGE

3,923

4,040

4,449

5,097

4,618

4,065

3,995

4,829

5,230

4,511

6,367

4,791

5,067

5,419

5,820

6,026

5,946

7,075

6,683

7,106

6,617

7,386

6,906

6,488

8,157

6,400

6,905

8,174

7,530

7,454

INFLOW

 3,456

 4,037

 4,496

 4,495

 4,496

 4,500

 4,551

 4,968

 4,956

 4,951

 4,944

 4,950

 5,485

 6,007

 6,014

 6,011

 6,015

 6,562

 6,480

 6,460

 7,013

 7,064

 7,520

 7,510

 7,521

 7,472

 7,468

 7,471

 7,468

 7,465

POWER

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

SPILL

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

FISHTRAP

 4

 3

 4

 3

 3

 3

 4

 3

 4

 3

 4

 5

 5

 5

 4

 3

 4

 4

 4

 6

 5

 5

 5

 4

 2

 2

 1

 4

 4

 6

C.F.S.

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

APRIL 2021 KESWICK RESERVOIR DAILY OPERATIONS RUN DATE: May 1, 2021

RES.

EVAP

C.F.S.

COMPUTED*

ACRE-FEET

RELEASE - C.F.S. 

TOTALS -1,681 177,074 177,806 0 0 116

ACRE-FEET -1,681 351,226 352,678 0 0 230

SUMMARY

RELEASE (ACRE-FEET)

POWER 352,678

SPILL 0

 20,323

FISH TRAP 0

SPRING

CR. P. P.

RELEASE (1)

 77

 139

 168

 497

 74

 0

 0

 45

 76

 754

 398

 52

 50

 39

 217

 40

 40

 40

 40

 62

 323

 76

 77

 145

 452

 78

 77

 77

 81

 77

 4,271

 8,472

*COMPUTED INFLOW IS SUM OF CHANGE IN STORAGE, RELEASES, AND EVAPORATION.

(1) EVAPORATION RECORDS TAKEN FROM SHASTA PAN.

SHASTA

RELEASE

C.F.S

 3,597

 3,644

 3,998

 4,164

 4,252

 3,791

 3,723

 4,445

 4,761

 3,433

 5,674

 4,253

 4,739

 5,031

 5,308

 5,603

 5,535

 6,637

 6,284

 6,468

 5,732

 6,837

 6,375

 6,045

 7,310

 6,058

 6,586

 7,755

 7,139

 7,108

 162,285

 321,892
#### E. P. Lawson Co., Inc., v. Rollin Browne et al., Constituting the State Tax Commission.

Present — Martin, P. J., Townley, Untermyer, Dore and Callahan, JJ.
**Exhibit 12.2**

 

**CERTIFICATION BY THE PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE**

**SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

I, Cathy L Anderson, certify that:

 

1.                                     I have reviewed this Amendment No. 1 to the annual report on Form 20-F of Sundance Energy Australia Limited:

 

2.                                      Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

 

3.                                      Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the company as of, and for, the periods presented in this report.

 
| Date: February 24,   2017  |   |
|---------------------------------|--------|
|                            |   |
|                            |   |
| /s/ Cathy L. Anderson           |   |
| Cathy L. Anderson               |   |
| Chief Financial Officer         |   |
| (Principal Financial   Officer) |   |

 

----
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

DAY HIGH

 635

 652

 640

 613

 604

 663

 664

 636

 721

 686

 684

 693

 698

 684

 658

 632

 617

 632

 641

 643

 685

 693

 644

 733

 722

 691

 678

 710

 662

 648

 526

 485

 485

 488

 483

 479

 473

 480

 466

 459

 479

 491

 496

 512

 481

 497

 488

 465

 486

 504

 500

 468

 443

 438

 424

 414

 408

 402

 403

 408

 595

 581

 569

 564

 553

 551

 552

 552

 575

 555

 574

 581

 592

 600

 581

 591

 573

 570

 573

 576

 570

 542

 515

 513

 496

 506

 497

 500

 481

 492

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

SEPTEMBER 2007 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: October 10, 2007

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

DELTA MENDOTA CANAL AT CHECK 13 (O'NEILL)
§ 404.708 How we decide what is enough evidence. When you give us evidence, we examine it to see if it is convincing evidence. If it is, no other evidence is needed. In deciding if evidence is convincing, we consider whether— ( a ) Information contained in the evidence was given by a person in a position to know the facts;
( b ) There was any reason to give false information when the evidence was created;
( c ) Information contained in the evidence was given under oath, or with witnesses present, or with the knowledge there was a penalty for giving false information;
( d ) The evidence was created at the time the event took place or shortly thereafter;
( e ) The evidence has been altered or has any erasures on it; and
( f ) Information contained in the evidence agrees with other available evidence, including our records.
### Part E—Classification of Positions
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

Pursuant to
18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned officer of BakBone Software, Inc. (the Company) hereby certifies, to such officers knowledge, that:

(a) the accompanying quarterly report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the quarterly period ended December 31, 2009
(the Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

(b) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
operations of the Company.

Dated: February 10, 2010

/s/     STEVE R.
MARTINSteve R. MartinSenior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer (Principal Financial Officer)
Editorial Note on Part 416
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 416 appear at 68 FR 53509, Sept. 11, 2003.

§ 416.1500 Introduction. You may appoint someone to represent you in any of your dealings with us. This subpart explains, among other things— ( a ) Who may be your representative and what his or her qualifications must be;
( b ) How you appoint a representative;
( c ) The payment of fees to a representative;
( d ) Our rules that representatives must follow; and
( e ) What happens to a representative who breaks the rules.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

DAY ELEVATION

 252.56

 252.58

 252.60

 252.54

 252.56

 252.50

 252.55

 252.58

 252.45

 252.51

 252.45

 252.56

 252.46

 252.55

 252.57

 252.57

 252.50

 252.57

 252.41

 252.50

 252.41

 252.51

 252.52

 252.51

 252.42

 252.50

 252.55

 252.57

 252.48

 252.45

 3,953

 3,963

 3,973

 3,943

 3,953

 3,924

 3,948

 3,963

 3,899

 3,928

 3,899

 3,953

 3,904

 3,948

 3,958

 3,958

 3,924

 3,958

 3,879

 3,924

 3,879

 3,928

 3,933

 3,928

 3,884

 3,924

 3,948

 3,958

 3,914

 3,899

STORAGE

-5

+10

+10

-30

+10

-29

+24

+15

-64

+29

-29

+54

-49

+44

+10

+0

-34

+34

-79

+45

-45

+49

+5

-5

-44

+40

+24

+10

-44

-15

CHANGE

 968

 972

 885

 903

 946

 855

 810

 799

 764

 814

 1,035

 1,047

 703

 730

 841

 861

 844

 882

 878

 911

 928

 1,047

 1,064

 1,030

 1,232

 1,286

 1,196

 1,185

 1,218

 1,169

 15,870

 15,750

 15,870

 16,470

 16,110

 15,990

 14,550

 15,630

 14,430

 15,750

 14,430

 15,510

 15,030

 15,630

 15,390

 16,110

 14,310

 13,830

 13,950

 15,150

 14,430

 15,390

 14,790

 15,030

 14,790

 14,670

 15,870

 13,110

 13,350

 13,350

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

JUNE 2006 RED BLUFF DIVERSION RESERVOIR DAILY OPERATIONS RUN DATE: August 15, 2006

IN LAKE

CANAL

 ACRE-FEET

TOTALS -59 28,803 450,540

ACRE-FEET -59 57,131 893,646

SUMMARY

RELEASE (ACRE-FEET)

TOTAL 954,020

 3,958

RELEASE

RIVER

CORNING TO SACTO

CANAL

RELEASE C.F.S.

TEHAMA

COLUSA

 43

 65

 41

 17

 24

 44

 46

 45

 47

 65

 58

 27

 56

 58

 46

 57

 60

 57

 55

 59

 56

 64

 85

 66

 68

 57

 87

 82

 46

 54

 1,635

 3,243

CORNING CANAL 3,243

TEHAMA-COLUSA CANAL 57,131

TO SACTO RIVER 893,646

Table 9
**SECTION 906 CERTIFICATION****CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 1350 OF CHAPTER 63 OF TITLE 18 OF THE UNITED STATES CODE**     I, Michael K. Farrell, the President of MetLife Insurance Company of Connecticut (the“Company”), certify that (i) the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June30, 2006 (the “Form 10-Q”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934 and (ii) the information contained in the Form 10-Q fairlypresents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of theCompany.Date:August 11, 2006         /s/ Michael K. Farrell  Michael K. Farrell   *President*        A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided toMetLife Insurance Company of Connecticut and will be retained by MetLife Insurance Company ofConnecticut and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
```

[Federal Register: April 26, 2011 (Volume 76, Number 80)]
[Notices]               
[Page 23272]
From the Federal Register Online via GPO Access [wais.access.gpo.gov]
[DOCID:fr26ap11-29]                         

========================================================================
Notices
                                                Federal Register
________________________________________________________________________

This section of the FEDERAL REGISTER contains documents other than rules 
or proposed rules that are applicable to the public. Notices of hearings 
and investigations, committee meetings, agency decisions and rulings, 
delegations of authority, filing of petitions and applications and agency 
statements of organization and functions are examples of documents 
appearing in this section.

========================================================================

[[Page 23272]]

AGENCY FOR INTERNATIONAL DEVELOPMENT

 
FY 2011 Emergency Food Assistance Annual Program Statement

    Pursuant to the Food for Peace Act of 2008 and the Foreign 
Assistance Act of 1961 (FAA), notice is hereby given that the FY 2011 
Emergency Food Assistance Annual Program Statement is available to 
interested parties for general viewing.
    For individuals who wish to review, the FY 2011 Emergency Food 
Assistance Annual Program Statement is available via the Food for Peace 
Web site: http://www.usaid.gov/our_work/humanitarian_assistance/ffp/emergency.html on or about April 18, 2011. Interested parties can also 
receive a copy of the FY 2011 Emergency Food Assistance Annual Program 
Statement by contacting the Office of Food for Peace, U.S. Agency for 
International Development, RRB 7.06-152, 1300 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW., 
Washington, DC 20523-7600.

Juli Majernik,
Grants Manager, Policy and Technical Division, Office of Food for 
Peace, Bureau for Democracy, Conflict and Humanitarian Assistance.
[FR Doc. 2011-9997 Filed 4-25-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE P
```
**EXHIBIT 31.1****CERTIFICATION**I, Revis L. Stephenson III, certify that:     1. I have reviewed this report on Form 10-KSB of Advanced BioEnergy, LLC;     2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material factor omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of thecircumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this report;     3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information includedin this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results ofoperations and cash flows of the small business issuer as of, and for, the periods presented inthis report;     4. The small business issuer’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishingand maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a–15(e) and15d–15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules13a–15(f) and 15d–15(f)) for the small business issuer and have:          (a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls andprocedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating tothe small business issuer, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by otherswithin those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;          (b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the small business issuer’s disclosure controls andprocedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosurecontrols and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on suchevaluation; and          (c) Disclosed in this report any change in the small business issuer’s internal control overfinancial reporting that occurred during the small business issuer’s most recent fiscal quarter(the small business issuer’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that hasmaterially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the small business issuer’sinternal control over financial reporting; and     5. The small business issuer’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on ourmost recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the small business issuer’sauditors and the audit committee of the small business issuer’s board of directors (or personsperforming the equivalent functions):          (a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation ofinternal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the smallbusiness issuer’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and          (b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have asignificant role in the small business issuer’s internal control over financial reporting.     Date:December 31, 2007 /s/ Revis L. Stephenson III                         Revis L. Stephenson III    *Chief Executive Officer*
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY HIGH

 72

 77

 76

 84

 76

 75

 77

 83

 77

 93

 76

 83

 91

 88

 97

 82

 89

 71

 73

 76

 69

 69

 92

 89

 76

 94

 80

 106

 86

 93

 91

 63

 62

 61

 63

 62

 63

 63

 64

 65

 68

 69

 68

 67

 68

 66

 67

 66

 60

 59

 60

 60

 60

 68

 68

 69

 71

 70

 70

 69

 70

 70

 64

 63

 63

 67

 65

 65

 66

 67

 69

 72

 70

 70

 71

 70

 70

 70

 69

 63

 63

 62

 62

 63

 72

 71

 72

 74

 72

 76

 72

 72

 73

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

JULY 2004 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: August 12, 2004

HIGH LOW MEAN

 69.1

 69.8

 70.5

 71.5

 72.1

 72.8

 72.5

 71.9

 71.4

 72.2

 73.2

 73.5

 73.2

 73.6

 73.2

 73.9

 73.8

 72.2

 71.7

 71.7

 72.1

 73.0

 74.7

 75.0

 75.5

 76.6

 76.2

 75.4

 74.8

 74.5

 74.5

 65.2

 65.7

 66.2

 67.1

 68.2

 68.8

 68.7

 68.0

 67.3

 67.5

 68.2

 69.3

 68.8

 68.5

 68.6

 69.3

 69.3

 68.9

 68.0

 68.2

 68.1

 68.3

 69.8

 70.4

 70.1

 71.4

 71.7

 70.7

 69.8

 69.6

 69.7

 67.0

 67.7

 68.3

 69.2

 70.0

 70.7

 70.7

 70.0

 69.5

 69.8

 70.6

 71.2

 71.1

 71.0

 70.9

 71.5

 71.5

 70.6

 69.8

 69.9

 70.1

 70.6

 72.2

 72.7

 72.8

 73.7

 74.0

 73.2

 72.4

 72.2

 72.0

HIGH LOW MEAN

 8.8

 8.8

 8.6

 8.6

 8.5

 8.4

 8.5

 8.9

 9.0

 8.9

 8.9

 8.9

 8.9

 8.8

 8.8

 8.7

 8.6

 8.8

 8.8

 9.1

 9.1

 9.0

 8.7

 8.7

 8.6

 8.5

 8.8

 8.8

 8.7

 8.8

 8.8

 8.5

 8.4

 8.2

 8.1

 8.0

 7.9

 7.8

 8.0

 8.4

 8.3

 8.2

 8.0

 8.1

 8.2

 8.2

 8.1

 8.1

 8.2

 8.3

 8.3

 8.6

 8.2

 8.0

 7.9

 7.9

 7.8

 7.7

 7.8

 7.9

 7.8

 7.8

 8.6

 8.5

 8.4

 8.3

 8.2

 8.1

 8.1

 8.4

 8.6

 8.5

 8.4

 8.3

 8.4

 8.4

 8.4

 8.3

 8.3

 8.5

 8.5

 8.6

 8.8

 8.6

 8.3

 8.2

 8.2

 8.0

 8.1

 8.2

 8.2

 8.2

 8.2

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

RIPON ON THE STANISLAUS RIVER

 ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS WATER TEMPERATURE, DEG DISSOLVED OXYZEN, PPM
Exhibit 32.2  CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002  In connection with the Quarterly Report of ALCO, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2008 (the "Report"), I, Colman Au, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:  1) The Report fully complies with the requirement of Section 13(a) or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and  2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the Company's financial position and results of operations.    By: /s/ Colman Au, Chief Financial Officer  Date: November 14, 2008