alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
##### Table of Contents



SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
 WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549
 FORM 8-K
 CURRENT REPORT PURSUANT
TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE
SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
 Date of Report (Date of earliest event reported): June 28, 2011
 Anchor BanCorp Wisconsin Inc.
  Wisconsin
 001-34955
    
    391726871(Commission File Number)
    
    (IRS Employer Identification No.)
 25 West Main Street, Madison, Wisconsin 57303
 608-252-8700
  o
    
    Written communications pursuant to Rule 425 under the Securities Act (17 CFR 230.425)o
    
    Soliciting material pursuant to Rule 14a12 under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.14a-12)o
    
    Pre-commencement communications pursuant to Rule 14d-2(b) under the Exchange Act (17 CFR
240.14d-2(b))o
    
    Pre-commencement communications pursuant to Rule 13e-4(c) under the Exchange Act (17 CFR
240.13e-4(c))




---



TABLE OF CONTENTS  Item 2.02 Results of Operations and Financial Condition.Item 9.01 Financial Statements and Exhibits.SIGNATURESEXHIBIT TABLEEX-99.1    Table of Contents  
 Item 2.02 Results of Operations and Financial Condition.
   
 Item 9.01 Financial Statements and Exhibits.




---



##### Table of Contents



SIGNATURES
  Anchor BanCorp Wisconsin, Inc.Date: July 1, 2011
    By:
    /s/ Mark D. TimmermanExecutive VicePresident, Secretary and
General Counsel




---



##### Table of Contents



EXHIBIT TABLE
 Exhibit
    
    Description99.1
    
    Anchor BanCorp Wisconsin Inc. Press Release dated June 28, 2011.
### SUBCHAPTER VIII—FOREIGN SERVICE RETIREMENT AND DISABILITY
#### Grace Lotito, Appellant, v. Samuel Kyriacus et al., Respondents.

Motion for reargument denied; motion for leave to appeal to the Court of Appeals denied. Present — Taylor, P. J., MeCurn, Love, Vaughan and Kimball, JJ. [See 272 App. Div. 635.]
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 10-7372

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff – Appellee,

v.

CLEVELAND MCLEAN, JR.,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern 

District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Robert G. Doumar, Senior

District Judge. (2:90-cr-00105-HCM-TEM-5; 2:08-cv-00588-RGD)

Submitted: April 14, 2011 Decided: April 28, 2011

Before WILKINSON, NIEMEYER, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Cleveland McLean, Jr., Appellant Pro Se. Neil H. MacBride, 

United States Attorney, Alexandria, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Cleveland McLean, Jr., appeals the district court’s 

order denying his 18 U.S.C. § 3582 (2006) motion. We previously 

remanded the case for further consideration of McLean’s motion. 

The district court reconsidered the motion and again denied it. 

We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. 

Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district 

court. United States v. McLean, Nos. 2:90-cr-00105-HCM-TEM-5; 

2:08-cv-00588-RGD (E.D. Va. filed Sept. 13 and entered Sept. 14, 

2010). We grant McLean’s motion to supplement his informal 

brief. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and 

legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials 

before the court and argument would not aid the decisional 

process.

AFFIRMED
**EXHIBIT 31.1**
**WRITTEN STATEMENT OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OFTHE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**
I, Stanislas Vilgrain, certify that:
1. I have reviewed this report on Form 10-Q of Cuisine Solutions, Inc.;
2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement of a materialfact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of thecircumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this quarterly report;
3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included inthis quarterly report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results ofoperations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterlyreport.
4. The registrant’s other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:
a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls andprocedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relatingto the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by otherswithin those entities, particularly during the period in which this quarterly report is beingprepared;
b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures andpresented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls andprocedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and
c) disclosed in this quarterly report any change in the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s second fiscal quarter that hasmaterially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internalcontrol over financial reporting; and
5. The registrant’s other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the auditcommittee of registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):
a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internalcontrols over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect theregistrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and
b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have asignificant role in the registrant’s internal controls over financial reporting.
Date: May 17, 2005        */s/ Stanislas Vilgrain*  *Stanislas Vilgrain*  *Chief Executive Officer(Principal Executive Officer)*
#### Thomas Malone, Respondent, v. Catholic Relief and Beneficiary Association, Appellant.

Judgment and order reversed and new trial granted, with costs to appellant to abide event. Held, that reversible error was committed by the trial court in refusing to permit the witness Dr. Hurley to testify to the number and dates of the professional visits which he paid to Mrs. Malone while she was in Mercy Hospital and during her last illness, and to permit the witness Theel to testify as to the times and places where she attended upon Mrs. Malone as a nurse, and in ruling that the witness Theel was precluded by section 834 of the Code of Civil Procedure from testifying to admissions and statements made to her, or in her hearing, by Mrs. Malone with reference to the circumstances under which Mrs. Malone applied for insurance in the defendant company, and in reference to any fraud or deception on her part in seeming said insurance. We do not pass upon the question as to whether Mrs. Malone’s declarations are otherwise competent against plaintiff, as the point was not raised. All concurred.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY HIGH

 3,287

 2,874

 3,077

 3,170

 3,427

 4,637

 6,027

 6,088

 5,999

 5,324

 5,329

 4,699

 5,926

 5,531

 4,569

 4,717

 5,595

 6,352

 7,228

 6,756

 6,808

 8,292

 9,060

 8,492

 8,946

 8,433

 9,382

 9,079

 7,648

 7,644

 7,728

 773

 699

 695

 735

 606

 636

 554

 613

 634

 650

 721

 830

 878

 977

 1,095

 1,063

 1,247

 1,420

 1,400

 1,550

 1,598

 1,488

 1,010

 1,434

 1,509

 1,801

 2,055

 2,101

 1,922

 2,400

 2,384

 1,745

 1,622

 1,404

 1,336

 1,216

 1,416

 1,614

 1,792

 1,894

 1,848

 1,960

 2,069

 2,151

 2,284

 2,346

 2,144

 2,506

 2,923

 3,275

 3,524

 3,838

 3,864

 3,935

 3,988

 4,210

 4,602

 4,575

 4,507

 4,166

 4,428

 4,397

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

AUGUST 2003 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: September 2, 2003

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

PITTSBURG TOP ON THE SACRAMENTO RIVER
SAT Report

PMN Number: P-09-0447

SAT Date: 7/7/2009

Print Date: 3/4/2013

Related cases:

Health related cases: 

Ecotox related cases: 

Concern levels:

Type of Concern: Health Eco Comments

Level of Concern: 1-2 2

 Persistence Bioaccum Toxicity Comments

2 21

Exposure Based Review:

Health: No

Ecotox: Yes

Routes of exposure: Health: Dermal and inhalation

Ecotox: All releases to water

Fate: ;

Keywords:

 Keywords: IRR-S,E,L,MM, LUNG, UNCERT-DEVEL, AQUATOX-A,C

Summary of Assessment:

 Fate:

Fate Summary: P-09-0447-48

FATE: Estimation for low weigh

log Kow = 4.37 (E); 

VP < 1.0E-6 torr at 25 EC (E)

BP > 400 EC (E)

H = 2.42E-6 (E)

log Koc = 4.47 (E)

log Fish BCF = 1.85 (E)

log Fish BAF = 3.17 (E) 
POTW removal (%) = 50 via sorption

Time for complete ultimate aerobic biodeg = wk-mo

Sorption to soils/sediments = strong

Volatilization half-life from a standard river = 480 hrs

Volatilization half-life from a standard lake = 220 da

Atmospheric Oxidation Half-life = 1.6 hr via OH radical

Atmospheric Oxidation Half-life = 2.1 hr via ozone

PBT Potential: P2B2

*CEB FATE: Migration to ground water = negl - slow

 Health:

 Health Summary: Absorption is nil through the skin based on 

physical/chemical properties, poor through the GI tract based on analogs, and moderate through 

the lungs based on analogs. There is concern for lung effects through activity if 

respirable particles are inhaled and concern for irritation to all exposed tissues based on 

activity. There is also uncertain concern for developmental toxicity based on 

summary data provided in the submission for the analog, 

which seemed to cause more effects in mice (litter loss at 300 mg/kg) than in other species. In 

repeated dose studies, the analogs included in the submission showed low toxicity with NOELs 

of about 200 mg/kg with non-specific effects such as reduced weight gain at higher doses. Low 

moderate concern. 

 Ecotox:

Test Organism Test 

Type

Test End 

Point

Predicted Measured Comments

fish 96-h LC50 11

daphnid 48-h LC50 2.4

green algal 96-h EC50 5.6

fish _ chronic value 1.7

daphnid _ chronic 

value

0.37

algal _ chronic 

value

0.95

Sewage Sludge 3-h EC50 _

Sewage Sludge _ Chronic 

Value

_

Ecotox Values Comments: 

Factors Values Comments

Assessment Factor 10

Concentration of Concern 

(ppb)

37

SARs
SAR Class

Ecotox Category 

Ecotox Factors Comments: 

 SAT Chair: Becky Jones
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

DAY HIGH

 15,805

 15,779

 15,519

 15,974

 15,192

 13,432

 13,949

 18,865

 15,808

 14,363

 18,838

 15,997

 16,179

 18,203

 17,221

 18,136

 18,485

 18,833

 21,504

 20,174

 22,475

 20,220

 17,180

 16,025

 15,580

 16,690

 16,176

 17,770

 16,637

 17,750

 6,820

 6,125

 6,089

 5,443

 4,486

 4,059

 4,641

 5,898

 5,512

 6,857

 9,506

 7,778

 8,054

 9,011

 9,572

 9,969

 8,898

 8,577

 8,809

 8,752

 9,017

 8,010

 7,048

 6,872

 7,668

 8,118

 8,327

 8,996

 7,514

 7,876

 11,103

 10,634

 10,926

 10,693

 9,482

 9,024

 9,632

 11,498

 11,930

 11,239

 14,481

 12,481

 12,602

 13,515

 13,637

 14,150

 13,845

 14,221

 14,695

 14,977

 15,762

 14,628

 13,341

 12,505

 12,354

 12,963

 12,509

 12,849

 11,958

 12,737

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

APRIL 2022 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: May 2, 2022

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

PORT CHICAGO TOP IN SUISUN BAY
#### § 411.580 Can an EN receive payments for milestones or outcome payment months that occur before the beneficiary assigns a ticket to the EN?

No. An EN (or State VR agency acting as an EN) may be paid only for milestones or outcome payment months that are achieved after the month in which the ticket is assigned to the EN or State VR agency acting as an EN (except as provided for in § 411.536).

[73 FR 29351, May 20, 2008]
#### David De SUSTAR-WARE, Plaintiff—Appellant, v. NORDSTROM, INCORPORATED; Talxucm Services, Incorporated, Defendants—Appellees.

No. 05-2387.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: June 28, 2006.

Decided: July 14, 2006.

David de Süstar-Ware, Appellant Pro Se. Ronda Brown Esaw, McGuirewoods, LLP, McLean, Virginia, for Appellee Nordstrom, Inc.

Before KING and SHEDD, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

*246Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).

PER CURIAM:

David de Süstar-Ware appeals the district court’s order dismissing his employment discrimination action for failure to prosecute under Fed.R.Civ.P. 41. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny all pending motions and affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. *See de Süstar-Ware v. Nordstrom, Inc.,*No. CA-04-1318-1 (E.D. Va. filed Nov. 4, 2005 & entered Nov. 7, 2005). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*AFFIRMED*
Garns Mountain

Bear Creek

Palisades

Italian Peak

Caribou City

Poker Peak

Mt. Jefferson

Diamond Peak

Garfield Mountain

Bald Mountain

Lionhead

Two Top

Raynolds Pass

Pole Creek

Winegar Hole

West Slope Tetons

§ ̈¦15

§ ̈¦86

§ ̈¦20

£¤26

£¤191

£¤20

£¤91

£¤30

£¤26

£¤20

£¤26

£¤20

¬«28

¬«32

¬«33

¬«22

¬«47

¬«31

¬«34

¬«39

¬«48

¬«33

Felt

Ucon

Gray

Bone

Iona

Ririe

Byrne

Teton

Idmon

Grant

Rigby

Menan

Hamer

Camas

Henry

Wayan

Irwin

Tyhee

Firth

Ammon

Victor

Driggs

Lamont Parker

Ashton

Dubois

Osgood

Freedom

Tetonia Rexburg

Newdale

Chester

Spencer

Kilgore

Lorenzo Roberts

Edmonds

Shelley

Lincoln

Gilmore

Drummond

Humphrey

Mud LakeTerreton

Chubbuck

Aberdeen

Sterling

Rockford

Berenice

Palisades

Fort Hall

Blackfoot

Pocatello

Monteview

Sugar City

Warm River

Lewisville

Butte City

Island Park

Big Springs

Idaho Falls Swan Valley

Springfield

Chesterfield

Clementsville

Saint Anthony

Management Themes Applied to Idaho Roadless Areas

Wild Land Recreation

Primitive

Backcountry/Restoration

General Forest , Rangeland and Grassland

Forest Plan Special Areas

Wilderness

National Forest System Lands

(Other ownership is not displayed)

Targhee Existing Plan Management Themes

10 5 0 10 I Miles

The USDA Forest Service uses the most current and complete

data available. GIS Data and product accuracy may vary.

Using GIS products for puposes other than those for which they

were intended may yield inaccurate or misleading results.

The USDA Forest Service reserves the right to correct, update,

modify, or replace GIS products without notification.
###### Editorial Note on Part 416

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 416 appear at 68 FR 53509, Sept. 11, 2003.

#### § 416.220 General.

If you are a *qualified* individual and have an essential person you may be eligible for increased benefits. You may be a qualified individual and have an essential person only if you received benefits under a State assistance plan approved under title I, X, XIV, or XVI (AABD) of the Act for December 1973. Definitions and rules that apply to qualified individuals and essential persons are discussed in §§ 416.221 through 416.223.
I 

114TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 3890 

To exempt safe and sound depository institutions, credit unions, and depository institution holding companies from certain titles of the Dodd-Frank 

Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act, and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

NOVEMBER 3, 2015 

Mr. CLAWSON of Florida introduced the following bill; which was referred to 

the Committee on Financial Services 

A BILL 

To exempt safe and sound depository institutions, credit 

unions, and depository institution holding companies 

from certain titles of the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Financial Institution 

5 Legislative Edict Simplification Act of 2015’’ or the 

6 ‘‘FILES Act of 2015’’. 


tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 3890 IH

1 SEC. 2. EXEMPTIONS FOR SAFE AND SOUND INSTITUTIONS. 

2 The Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer 

3 Protection Act (12 U.S.C. 5301 et seq.) is amended— 

4 (1) by inserting after section 6 the following: 

5 ‘‘SEC. 7. EXEMPTIONS FOR SAFE AND SOUND INSTITU6 TIONS. 

7 ‘‘(a) SAFE AND SOUND INSTITUTION DEFINED.— 

8 For purposes of this section, the term ‘safe and sound in9 stitution’ means a depository institution, credit union, 

10 bank holding company, or savings and loan holding com11 pany that— 

12 ‘‘(1) has total consolidated assets of less than 

13 $50,000,000,000; and 

14 ‘‘(2) has a composite CAMEL rating of 1 or 2 

15 under the Uniform Financial Institutions Rating 

16 System (or an equivalent rating under a comparable 

17 rating system) as of the entity’s most recent exam18 ination. 

19 ‘‘(b) EXEMPTIONS.—The following provisions of law 

20 shall not apply to a safe and sound institution: 

21 ‘‘(1) Title I of this Act, and any amendments 

22 made by such title. 

23 ‘‘(2) Title II of this Act, and any amendments 

24 made by such title. 

25 ‘‘(3) Title VI of this Act, and any amendments 

26 made by such title. 


tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
3 

•HR 3890 IH

1 ‘‘(4) Title XIV of this Act, and any amend2 ments made by such title.’’; and 

3 (2) in the table of contents in section 1(b), by 

4 inserting after the item relating to section 6 the fol5 lowing: 

‘‘Sec. 7. Exemption for safe and sound institutions.’’. 

Æ 


tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY HIGH

 9,517

 12,042

 12,447

 13,689

 16,747

 16,045

 12,485

 11,807

 11,009

 7,496

 5,962

 5,623

 4,848

 6,450

 10,470

 12,187

 11,054

 5,116

 2,932

 1,949

 633

 476

 408

 368

 335

 315

 305

 282

 321

 355

 607

 2,638

 3,098

 3,107

 4,043

 4,389

 6,231

 4,409

 3,792

 3,531

 2,311

 1,134

 870

 662

 605

 1,426

 3,164

 1,213

 587

 444

 400

 401

 359

 325

 296

 281

 266

 264

 259

 259

 262

 271

 4,892

 6,222

 6,879

 8,057

 10,522

 10,735

 8,844

 7,586

 7,321

 4,729

 3,576

 2,818

 2,079

 2,694

 4,446

 6,440

 5,784

 2,008

 949

 713

 475

 403

 360

 325

 303

 289

 282

 273

 279

 282

 321

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

JANUARY 2019 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: February 11, 2019

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

PITTSBURG BOTTOM ON THE SACRAMENTO RIVER
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

DAY HIGH

 326

 286

 287

 297

 279

 308

 343

 441

 608

 830

 823

 635

 527

 370

 282

 253

 246

 247

 250

 265

 291

 382

 810

 432

 371

 367

 281

 313

 298

 267

 274

 266

 251

 250

 227

 249

 231

 225

 233

 247

 268

 267

 261

 245

 239

 222

 237

 231

 230

 237

 224

 229

 252

 258

 264

 265

 239

 261

 241

 238

 292

 277

 264

 260

 247

 258

 253

 285

 321

 370

 407

 376

 342

 279

 251

 236

 242

 239

 236

 244

 241

 260

 342

 302

 295

 291

 268

 275

 262

 254

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

APRIL 2012 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: June 5, 2012

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

PITTSBURG TOP ON THE SACRAMENTO RIVER
###### Editorial Note on Part 416

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 416 appear at 68 FR 53509, Sept. 11, 2003.

#### § 416.702 Definitions.

For purposes of this subpart—

*Essential person* means someone whose presence was believed to be necessary for your welfare under the State program that preceded the SSI program. (See §§ 416.220 through 416.223 of this part.)

*Parent* means a natural parent, an adoptive parent, or the spouse of a natural or adoptive parent.

*Representative payee* means an individual, an agency, or an institution selected by us to receive and manage SSI benefits on your behalf. (See subpart F of this part for details describing when a representative payee is selected and a representative payee's responsibilities.)

*Residence in the United States* means that your permanent home is in the United States.

*United States* or *U.S.* means the 50 States, the District of Columbia, and the Northern Mariana Islands.

*We, Us,* or *Our* means the Social Security Administration.

*You* or *Your* means an applicant, an eligible individual, an eligible spouse, or an eligible child.

[46 FR 5873, Jan. 21, 1981, as amended at 65 FR 16814, Mar. 30, 2000]
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

DAY HIGH

 73

 75

 80

 85

 83

 86

 164

 85

 86

 86

 85

 81

 69

 69

 73

 70

 73

 80

 72

 75

 77

 79

 83

 86

 99

 91

 85

 82

 83

 126

 68

 70

 72

 78

 79

 78

 80

 77

 76

 78

 79

 69

 67

 68

 69

 66

 66

 66

 69

 69

 72

 74

 77

 80

 84

 84

 80

 80

 81

 81

 71

 72

 75

 81

 80

 81

 97

 79

 80

 82

 81

 74

 68

 68

 70

 68

 67

 69

 71

 72

 74

 76

 80

 83

 90

 86

 83

 81

 82

 86

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

APRIL 2015 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: May 1, 2015

HIGH LOW MEAN

 60.9

 60.6

 62.1

 63.9

 61.7

 61.9

 61.4

 61.0

 62.6

 65.7

 66.1

 64.5

 61.9

 60.0

 59.3

 60.0

 61.1

 62.3

 63.9

 65.4

 65.6

 65.9

 68.1

 68.3

 68.7

 69.7

 72.8

 75.3

 75.7

 76.7

 58.1

 57.1

 57.2

 58.6

 59.5

 57.1

 58.9

 56.9

 57.2

 59.5

 61.3

 62.1

 58.6

 57.9

 56.9

 57.1

 58.1

 59.2

 60.2

 61.1

 61.8

 62.1

 62.9

 64.1

 64.3

 63.4

 65.1

 67.6

 68.2

 69.2

 59.6

 59.0

 59.7

 61.1

 60.5

 59.5

 60.1

 58.9

 59.8

 62.3

 63.6

 63.3

 60.0

 58.9

 58.1

 58.5

 59.5

 60.6

 61.9

 63.2

 63.8

 64.1

 65.3

 66.0

 66.3

 66.4

 68.7

 71.1

 71.8

 72.8

HIGH LOW MEAN

 9.5

 9.7

 9.4

 9.2

 9.2

 9.6

 9.4

 9.8

 9.7

 9.5

 9.3

 9.5

 9.8

 10.0

 10.1

 10.1

 10.0

 9.8

 9.5

 9.2

 9.0

 9.0

 8.8

 8.5

 8.4

 8.7

 8.8

 8.3

 8.2

 8.2

 9.3

 9.3

 8.8

 8.7

 8.7

 9.1

 9.0

 9.2

 9.0

 8.8

 8.7

 8.7

 9.6

 9.8

 9.9

 9.8

 9.7

 9.5

 9.2

 8.8

 8.7

 8.6

 8.3

 8.2

 8.0

 8.1

 7.9

 7.7

 7.6

 7.5

 9.4

 9.5

 9.2

 8.9

 9.0

 9.3

 9.2

 9.4

 9.4

 9.1

 9.0

 9.1

 9.7

 9.9

 10.0

 10.0

 9.8

 9.7

 9.4

 9.1

 8.9

 8.8

 8.6

 8.3

 8.2

 8.4

 8.2

 8.0

 7.9

 7.8

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

RIPON ON THE STANISLAUS RIVER

 ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS WATER TEMPERATURE, DEG DISSOLVED OXYZEN, PPM