alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
_______________________________________ __ Michigan Supreme Court 

# Order

Lansing, Michigan

October 26, 2005 Clifford W. Taylor,
Chief Justice

126561 Michael F. Cavanagh
Elizabeth A. Weaver Marilyn Kelly Maura D. Corrigan Robert P. Young, Jr. PHOENIX INVESTMENT HOLDING Stephen J. Markman, COMPANY, INC., WOODLAND Justices EXCAVATING, L.L.C., and WILLACKER HOMES, INC., Plaintiffs-Appellees,

v SC: 126561 COA: 246398 Oakland CC: 01-035158-CK NOSAN & SILVERMAN HOMES, L.L.C., SILVERMAN DEVELOPMENT CO., SILVERMAN HOMES, INC., SILVERMAN CONSTRUCTION CO. and TOLL BROTHERS, INC., Defendants-Appellants.

________________ _______________ __________/

On October 19, 2005, the Court heard oral argument on the application for leave to appeal the April 20, 2004 judgment of the Court of Appeals. On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal is again considered and, pursuant to MCR 7.302(G)(1), in lieu of granting leave to appeal, we VACATE in part the judgment of the Court of Appeals and REINSTATE in part the May 7, 2002 order of the Oakland Circuit Court, as to plaintiffs’ Count II. The circuit cour t properly dismissed Count II because the liquidated damages provision also applied to non-monet ary default, such as the failure to
enter into excavation contracts. We REMAND this case to the Oakland Circuit Court for further proceedings consistent with this orde r and the non-vacated po rtion of the Court of Appeals judgment.

p1019 I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

October 26, 2005

Clerk
**PricewaterhouseCoopers
      LLP**


10
      Tenth
      Street, Suite 1400


Atlanta
      GA 30309-3851


Telephone
      (678) 419 1000


Facsimile
      (678) 419 1239






**Report
      of Independent Accountants**




To
      the
      Board of Directors and Stockholder


of
      SunTrust Mortgage, Inc. and Subsidiaries:




We
      have
      examined management's assertion about SunTrust Mortgage, Inc. and its subsidiaries'
      (the "Company") compliance with the minimum servicing standards identified
      in


the
      Mortgage Bankers Association of America's *Uniform
      Single Attestation Program for* *Mortgage
      Bankers* ("USAP")
      as of and for the year ended December 31, 2005 included in the accompanying
      management assertion (see Exhibit I). Management is responsible for the Company's
      compliance with those minimum servicing standards. Our responsibility is to


express
      an opinion on management's assertion about the Company's compliance based on
      our examination.




Our
      examination was made in accordance with attestation standards established by
      the American
      Institute of Certified Public Accountants and, accordingly, included examining,
      on a


test
      basis, evidence about the Company's compliance with the minimum servicing
      standards and
      performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the
      circumstances. We believe
      that our examination provides a reasonable basis for our opinion. Our
      examination does
      not
      provide a legal determination on the Company's compliance with the minimum


servicing
      standards.




In
      our
      opinion, management's assertion that the Company complied with the
      aforementioned minimum
      servicing standards as of and for the year ended December 31, 2005 is fairly
      stated, in
      all
      material respects.




/s/ PricewaterhouseCoopers  LLP





February 21, 2006
**EXHIBIT 31.2**
**CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER CERTIFICATIONS**
I, Elissa J. Lindsoe, Chief Financial Officer, certify that:
1.  I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Identix Incorporated (the“registrant”); 2.  Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement of amaterial fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in lightof the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to theperiod covered by this quarterly report; 3.  Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included inthis quarterly report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition,results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presentedin this report; 4.  The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and15d-15(e) for the registrant and have:
     a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls andprocedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating tothe registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others withinthose entities, particularly during the period in which this quarterly report is being prepared;
     b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures andpresented in this quarterly report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosurecontrols and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on suchevaluation; and
     c) disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’sfourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or isreasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting; and
5.  The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and theaudit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalentfunctions):
     a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation ofinternal controls over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect theregistrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and
     b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who havea significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.        Date: February 9, 2005 By:  /s/ Elissa J. Lindsoe    Elissa J. Lindsoe    Chief Financial Officer   
31
### §1101. Repealed. Pub. L. 96–465, title II, §2205(1), Oct. 17, 1980, 94 Stat. 2159

Section, act Aug. 13, 1946, ch. 957, title VIII, §861, 60 Stat. 1024, related to estimation of needed appropriations by Secretary of Treasury.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date of Repeal

Repeal effective Feb. 15, 1981, except as otherwise provided, see section 2403 of Pub. L. 96–465, set out as an Effective Date note under section 3901 of this title.
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 07-1673

MIREILLE ESSONG ENGOULOU, Petitioner, v. MICHAEL B. MUKASEY, Attorney General, Respondent.
On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals. (A98-317-657) Submitted: March 12, 2008 Decided: April 4, 2008 Before WILKINSON, MICHAEL, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges. Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion. Ronald D. Richey, LAW OFFICES OF RONALD D. RICHEY, Rockville, Maryland, for Petitioner. Jeffrey S. Bucholtz, Assistant Attorney General, James A. Hunolt, Senior Litigation Counsel, David Schor, Trial Attorney, Office of Immigration Litigation, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Washington, D.C., for Respondent. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.- 2 - PER CURIAM: Mireille Essong Engoulou, a native and citizen of Cameroon, petitions for review of an order of the Board of Immigration Appeals (“Board”) denying her motion to reconsider a prior order of the Board denying a motion to reopen removal proceedings. We have reviewed the administrative record and find no abuse of discretion in the Board’s order. See 8 C.F.R. § 1003.2(a) (2007) (standard of review); Jean v. Gonzales , 435 F.3d 475, 481, 482-83 (4th Cir. 2006) (same). We therefore deny the petition for review for the reasons stated by the Board. See In Re: Essong Engoulou , No. A98-317-657 (B.I.A. June 18, 2007). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

PETITION DENIED
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<CIK> 0000791231
<NAME> 85B.
<MULTIPLIER> 1
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1997
<CASH>                                          89,812
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   85,315
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               175,127
<PP&E>                                       5,304,077
<DEPRECIATION>                               4,092,446
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,386,758
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           18,571
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                   1,368,187
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 1,386,758
<SALES>                                        538,813
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               544,430
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  721,521
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (177,091)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          (177,091)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (177,091)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  (21.95)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER>  1
       
<S>                                         <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                               9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                                                  MAR-31-1996
<PERIOD-END>                                                       DEC-31-1995
<CASH>                                                             7,871,491
<SECURITIES>                                                         633,917
<RECEIVABLES>                                                     27,982,460
<ALLOWANCES>                                                         124,207
<INVENTORY>                                                                0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                                  44,977,600
<PP&E>                                                            10,633,552
<DEPRECIATION>                                                     4,452,537
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                                    62,703,263
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                             31,068,829
<BONDS>                                                                    0
<COMMON>                                                              89,294
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                                      0
<PREFERRED>                                                        6,420,363
<OTHER-SE>                                                        20,101,187
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                                      62,703,263
<SALES>                                                                    0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                                  78,764,862
<CGS>                                                                      0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                                     71,695,095
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                                       2,087
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                                     157,865
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                                    63,039
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                                    5,502,135
<INCOME-TAX>                                                       2,617,363
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                                2,884,772
<DISCONTINUED>                                                             0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                                            0
<CHANGES>                                                                  0
<NET-INCOME>                                                       2,884,772
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                                            .18
<EPS-DILUTED>                                                            .17
        

</TABLE>
```

[Congressional Bills 114th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 3931 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

114th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 3931

 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
at 620 Central Avenue Suite 1A in Hot Springs National Park, Arkansas, 
  as the ``Chief Petty Officer Adam Brown United States Post Office''.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            November 4, 2015

  Mr. Westerman (for himself, Mr. Crawford, Mr. Hill, Mr. Zinke, Mr. 
  McDermott, and Mr. Womack) introduced the following bill; which was 
      referred to the Committee on Oversight and Government Reform

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
at 620 Central Avenue Suite 1A in Hot Springs National Park, Arkansas, 
  as the ``Chief Petty Officer Adam Brown United States Post Office''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. CHIEF PETTY OFFICER ADAM BROWN UNITED STATES POST OFFICE.

    (a) Designation.--The facility of the United States Postal Service 
located at 620 Central Avenue Suite 1A in Hot Springs National Park, 
Arkansas, shall be known and designated as the ``Chief Petty Officer 
Adam Brown United States Post Office''.
    (b) References.--Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, 
paper, or other record of the United States to the facility referred to 
in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``Chief 
Petty Officer Adam Brown United States Post Office''.
                                 <all>
```
I 

114TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 4142 

To amend the Trade Act of 1974 to increase the authorization of funds 

for trade adjustment assistance for firms. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

DECEMBER 1, 2015 

Mr. AGUILAR introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Ways and Means 

A BILL 

To amend the Trade Act of 1974 to increase the authorization of funds for trade adjustment assistance for firms. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Displaced Jobs Relief 

5 Act of 2015’’. 

6 SEC. 2. INCREASED AUTHORIZATION FOR TRADE ADJUST7 MENT ASSISTANCE FOR FIRMS. 

8 Section 255(a) of the Trade Act of 1974 (19 U.S.C. 

9 2345(a)) is amended— 


smartinez on DSK4TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 4142 IH

1 (1) by striking ‘‘$16,000,000’’ and inserting 

2 ‘‘$50,000,000’’; and 

3 (2) by striking ‘‘2015’’ and inserting ‘‘2016’’. 

Æ 


smartinez on DSK4TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
### SUBCHAPTER II—ACTIONS BY THE SECRETARY OF STATE
[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 76 (Wednesday, April 20, 2011)]
[Notices]
[Page 22169]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2011-9590]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY

Internal Revenue Service


Open Meeting of the Area 3 Taxpayer Advocacy Panel (Including the 
States of Alabama, Georgia, Florida, Louisiana, Mississippi, Tennessee, 
and Puerto Rico)

AGENCY: Internal Revenue Service (IRS), Treasury.

ACTION: Notice of meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: An open meeting of the Area 3 Taxpayer Advocacy Panel will be 
conducted. The Taxpayer Advocacy Panel is soliciting public comments, 
ideas, and suggestions on improving customer service at the Internal 
Revenue Service.

DATES: The meeting will be held Wednesday, June 1, 2011.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Donna Powers at 1-888-912-1227 or 954-
423-7977.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Notice is hereby given pursuant to Section 
10(a)(2) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, 5 U.S.C. App. (1988) 
that a meeting of the Area 3 Taxpayer Advocacy Panel will be held 
Wednesday, June 1, 2011, at 3:30 p.m. Eastern Time via telephone 
conference. The public is invited to make oral comments or submit 
written statements for consideration. Due to limited conference lines, 
notification of intent to participate must be made with Donna Powers. 
For more information please contact Ms. Powers at 1-888-912-1227 or 
954-423-7977, or write TAP Office, 1000 South Pine Island Road, Suite 
340, Plantation, FL 33324, or post comments to the Web site: http://www.improveirs.org.
    The agenda will include various IRS issues.

    Dated: April 15, 2011.
Shawn Collins,
Director, Taxpayer Advocacy Panel.
[FR Doc. 2011-9590 Filed 4-19-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4830-01-P
Dismissed and Memorandum Opinion filed September 9, 2014.

In The

Fourteenth Court of Appeals

NO. 14-14-00675-CR

NO. 14-14-00676-CR

JAMES DAUBREY JONES, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the 338th District Court

Harris County, Texas

Trial Court Cause Nos. 1399882 and 1400256

M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N

Appellant entered a guilty plea to two counts of aggravated robbery with a 

deadly weapon. In each case, in accordance with the terms of a plea bargain 

agreement with the State, the trial court sentenced appellant on July 29, 2014, to 

confinement for twenty years in the Institutional Division of the Texas Department 

of Criminal Justice. The sentences were ordered to run concurrently. Appellant 

filed a pro se notice of appeal in each case. We dismiss the appeals. 
2

In each case, the trial court entered a certification of the defendant’s right to 

appeal in which the court certified that this is a plea bargain case, and the 

defendant has no right of appeal. See Tex. R. App. P. 25.2(a)(2). The trial court’s 

certification is included in each record on appeal. See Tex. R. App. P. 25.2(d). 

The record in each case supports the trial court’s certification. See Dears v. State, 

154 S.W.3d 610, 615 (Tex. Crim. App. 2005).

Accordingly, we dismiss the appeals. 

PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Chief Justice Frost and Justices Christopher and Busby.

Do Not Publish — Tex. R. App. P. 47.2(b)
I 

114TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 4111 

To include skilled nursing facilities as a type of health care provider under 

section 254(h) of the Communications Act of 1934. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

NOVEMBER 19, 2015 

Mr. LANCE (for himself, Mr. CRAMER, and Mr. LOEBSACK) introduced the 

following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Energy and Commerce 

A BILL 

To include skilled nursing facilities as a type of health care 

provider under section 254(h) of the Communications 

Act of 1934. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Rural Health Care 

5 Connectivity Act of 2015’’. 

6 SEC. 2. TELECOMMUNICATIONS SERVICES FOR SKILLED 

7 NURSING FACILITIES. 

8 (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 254(h)(7)(B) of the Com9 munications Act of 1934 (47 U.S.C. 254(h)(7)(B)) is 

10 amended— 

mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with BILLS

2 

•HR 4111 IH

1 (1) in clause (vi), by striking ‘‘and’’ at the end; 

2 (2) by redesignating clause (vii) as clause (viii); 

3 (3) by inserting after clause (vi) the following: 

4 ‘‘(vii) skilled nursing facilities;’’; and 

5 (4) in clause (viii), as redesignated, by striking 

6 ‘‘clauses (i) through (vi)’’ and inserting ‘‘clauses (i) 

7 through (vii)’’. 

8 (b) SAVINGS CLAUSE.—Nothing in subsection (a) 

9 shall be construed to affect the aggregate annual cap on 

10 Federal universal service support for health care providers 

11 under section 54.675 of title 47, Code of Federal Regula12 tions, or any successor regulation. 

Æ 

mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with BILLS
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY HIGH

 158

 175

 126

 123

 137

 146

 142

 146

 155

 140

 127

 116

 148

 168

 179

 191

 180

 172

 168

 191

 183

 199

 192

 191

 198

 172

 179

 153

 157

 154

 168

 123

 120

 119

 102

 115

 129

 129

 126

 123

 111

 109

 113

 116

 135

 144

 147

 142

 141

 140

 148

 150

 149

 149

 148

 149

 123

 143

 122

 133

 133

 136

 133

 140

 124

 112

 125

 133

 137

 138

 134

 123

 115

 114

 126

 141

 149

 153

 149

 145

 146

 155

 154

 158

 153

 155

 156

 148

 150

 138

 144

 139

 144

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

JANUARY 2005 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: March 4, 2005

HIGH LOW MEAN

 51.9

 51.7

 51.9

 51.1

 50.0

 51.3

 51.6

 53.1

 52.1

 53.2

 53.1

 50.8

 48.8

 49.3

 49.1

 49.3

 49.3

 49.8

 49.7

 49.9

 50.0

 50.1

 50.4

 51.2

 53.1

 54.7

 53.4

 53.4

 51.7

 51.3

 51.6

 51.2

 50.9

 51.1

 49.8

 48.5

 49.5

 50.0

 51.2

 51.1

 51.6

 51.0

 47.5

 45.9

 48.4

 48.2

 48.1

 48.3

 48.8

 49.0

 49.0

 49.1

 49.3

 49.2

 49.9

 50.5

 52.3

 51.3

 51.8

 50.5

 49.0

 49.0

 51.5

 51.4

 51.4

 50.7

 49.3

 50.2

 50.9

 52.0

 51.6

 52.3

 52.2

 48.9

 47.7

 48.6

 48.5

 48.6

 48.7

 49.2

 49.3

 49.4

 49.5

 49.6

 49.8

 50.5

 51.6

 53.2

 52.3

 52.6

 51.0

 50.2

 50.4

HIGH LOW MEAN

 8.9

 8.1

 8.2

 8.9

 8.8

 8.8

 8.9

 8.5

 8.6

 8.2

 8.2

 0.0

 9.2

 9.4

 9.7

 9.9

 9.9

 9.9

 11.0

 10.8

 10.4

 10.1

 10.0

 9.8

 9.5

 9.2

 9.2

 9.0

 9.2

 8.9

 8.9

 8.1

 7.9

 8.0

 8.3

 8.7

 8.6

 8.2

 8.0

 8.0

 7.8

 7.6

 0.0

 8.6

 9.1

 9.4

 9.6

 9.6

 9.8

 9.5

 10.4

 10.1

 9.9

 9.8

 9.5

 9.2

 8.8

 8.8

 8.2

 8.3

 8.6

 8.6

 8.6

 8.0

 8.1

 8.7

 8.7

 8.7

 8.6

 8.2

 8.4

 8.0

 7.8

 0.0

 9.1

 9.3

 9.6

 9.7

 9.8

 9.8

 10.2

 10.5

 10.2

 10.0

 9.9

 9.7

 9.4

 9.0

 9.0

 8.7

 8.9

 8.7

 8.8

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

RIPON ON THE STANISLAUS RIVER

 ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS WATER TEMPERATURE, DEG DISSOLVED OXYZEN, PPM