alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
### §360b–1. Priority zoonotic animal drugs

#### (a) In general

The Secretary shall, at the request of the sponsor intending to submit an application for approval of a new animal drug under section 360b(b)(1) of this title or an application for conditional approval of a new animal drug under section 360ccc of this title, expedite the development and review of such new animal drug if preliminary clinical evidence indicates that the new animal drug, alone or in combination with 1 or more other animal drugs, has the potential to prevent or treat a zoonotic disease in animals, including a vector borne-disease, that has the potential to cause serious adverse health consequences for, or serious or life-threatening diseases in, humans.

#### (b) Request for designation

The sponsor of a new animal drug may request the Secretary to designate a new animal drug described in subsection (a) as a priority zoonotic animal drug. A request for the designation may be made concurrently with, or at any time after, the opening of an investigational new animal drug file under section 360b(j) of this title or the filing of an application under section 360b(b)(1) or 360ccc of this title.

#### (c) Designation

#### (1) In general

Not later than 60 calendar days after the receipt of a request under subsection (b), the Secretary shall determine whether the new animal drug that is the subject of the request meets the criteria described in subsection (a). If the Secretary determines that the new animal drug meets the criteria, the Secretary shall designate the new animal drug as a priority zoonotic animal drug and shall take such actions as are appropriate to expedite the development and review of the application for approval or conditional approval of such new animal drug.

#### (2) Actions

The actions to expedite the development and review of an application under paragraph (1) may include, as appropriate—

(A) taking steps to ensure that the design of clinical trials is as efficient as practicable, when scientifically appropriate, such as by utilizing novel trial designs or drug development tools (including biomarkers) that may reduce the number of animals needed for studies;

(B) providing timely advice to, and interactive communication with, the sponsor (which may include meetings with the sponsor and review team) regarding the development of the new animal drug to ensure that the development program to gather the nonclinical and clinical data necessary for approval is as efficient as practicable;

(C) involving senior managers and review staff with experience in zoonotic or vector-borne disease to facilitate collaborative, cross-disciplinary review, including, as appropriate, across agency centers; and

(D) implementing additional administrative or process enhancements, as necessary, to facilitate an efficient review and development program.

(June 25, 1938, ch. 675, §512A, as added Pub. L. 116–136, div. A, title III, §3302, Mar. 27, 2020, 134 Stat. 384.)
(No. 4177

#### Melvin W. Newman, Claimant, *vs.*State of Illinois, Respondent.

*Opinion filed June*6, *1950.*

William L. Carlin, Attorney for Claimant.

Ivan A. Elliott, Attorney General; William J. Colohan, Assistant Attorney General, for Respondent.

ScHUMAN, C. J.

Claimant sustained an injury to Ms left knee on March 1, 1948 wMle employed by the Division of Highways, under the classification laborer-construction.

There are no jurisdictional questions involved. All temporary total disability payments have been made. Claimant also seeks to recover for an injury to Ms left elbow. It is undisputed that this' injury did not occur in the course of his employment. Therefore no recovery can be allowed for this injury. Claimant’s, earnings in the year preceding Ms injury were $2,480.00.

Dr. H. B. Thomas, professor emeritus of orthopedics, Illinois University, College of Medicine, examined and treated claimant. In his opinion claimant has sustained 20% total disability to left leg/ This is the only medical evidence offered.

From the evidence, claimant is entitled to an award of 20% total disability of the left leg.

Rothbart and Sewell have submitted a statement for $35.80 for stenographic services. The claim is reasonable and is allowed.

William J. Cleary & Co. have submitted a statement, *217for stenographic services. The claim is reasonable and is allowed.

Claimant was overpaid for non-productive time in the amount of $129.34. This amount will be deducted from the award.

On the basis of this record, we make the following award:

> 20% permanent partial specific loss of the use of the left leg in tfie amount of $741.00, less tfie sum of $129.34 paid for non-productive time, making an award of $611.66, all of wfiicfi lias accrued and is payable forthwith.

An award is also entered in favor of Rothbart & Sewell for stenographic services in the amount of $35.80, which is payable forthwith.

An award is also entered in favor of William J. Cleary & Co. for stenographic services in the amount of $21.10, which is payable forthwith.

This award is subject to the approval of the Governor, as provided in Section 3 of “An Act concerning the payment of compensation awards to State employees”.
### §§1935, 1936. Repealed. Pub. L. 87–195, pt. III, §642(a)(2), Sept. 4, 1961, 75 Stat. 460

Section 1935, acts Aug. 26, 1954, ch. 937, ch. II, §415, 68 Stat. 849; July 18, 1956, ch. 627, §8(l), 70 Stat. 559, related to stockpiling of supplies.

Section 1936, acts Aug. 26, 1954, ch. 937, ch. II, §416, 68 Stat. 849; Aug. 14, 1957, Pub. L. 85–141, §8(m), 71 Stat. 362, provided for facilitation and encouragement of travel.
**EXHIBIT 31.2**
**CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER CERTIFICATIONS**
I, Elissa J. Lindsoe, Chief Financial Officer, certify that:
1.        I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Identix Incorporated (the“registrant”); 2.        Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement of amaterial fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in lightof the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to theperiod covered by this quarterly report; 3.        Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included inthis quarterly report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition,results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presentedin this report; 4.        The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and15d-15(e) for the registrant and have:
     a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls andprocedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating tothe registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others withinthose entities, particularly during the period in which this quarterly report is being prepared;
     b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures andpresented in this quarterly report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosurecontrols and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on suchevaluation; and
     c) disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting that occurredduring the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarterin the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely tomaterially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and
5.        The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and theaudit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalentfunctions):
     a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation ofinternal controls over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect theregistrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and
     b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who havea significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.        Date: May 10, 2005 By:  /s/ Elissa J. Lindsoe   Elissa J. Lindsoe   Chief Financial Officer
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY HIGH

 109

 109

 113

 114

 114

 113

 112

 112

 111

 112

 113

 113

 134

 107

 110

 119

 122

 122

 135

 123

 122

 127

 125

 127

 133

 124

 125

 129

 128

 122

 127

 105

 105

 109

 110

 109

 108

 108

 108

 108

 108

 109

 109

 104

 98

 100

 99

 105

 106

 108

 113

 119

 121

 121

 122

 121

 120

 120

 122

 117

 115

 108

 106

 107

 111

 111

 111

 110

 110

 110

 109

 109

 110

 110

 110

 104

 106

 108

 110

 116

 118

 120

 121

 125

 123

 125

 127

 122

 123

 124

 120

 119

 120

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

DECEMBER 2002 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: January 16, 2003

HIGH LOW MEAN

 53.0

 53.2

 53.1

 52.8

 52.5

 52.2

 53.5

 52.9

 51.8

 52.7

 52.5

 53.0

 53.4

 55.5

 54.7

 55.3

 55.3

 54.0

 51.8

 51.0

 52.3

 52.4

 51.0

 49.4

 48.9

 50.7

 52.5

 54.0

 53.3

 52.4

 52.6

 50.9

 51.2

 50.7

 50.8

 50.5

 50.9

 51.5

 51.0

 51.0

 51.0

 51.7

 52.3

 52.1

 53.2

 53.8

 54.0

 54.1

 51.9

 49.9

 49.6

 50.5

 50.9

 49.0

 48.2

 47.8

 48.7

 50.6

 52.4

 52.3

 51.4

 51.0

 51.9

 52.3

 52.0

 51.9

 51.6

 51.7

 52.4

 52.0

 51.5

 51.8

 52.1

 52.6

 52.7

 54.3

 54.3

 54.7

 54.8

 52.8

 50.7

 50.1

 51.3

 51.6

 50.0

 48.9

 48.5

 49.6

 51.4

 52.9

 52.8

 51.8

 51.6

HIGH LOW MEAN

 11.3

 11.2

 11.3

 11.4

 11.4

 11.3

 11.1

 11.3

 11.3

 11.0

 11.0

 10.9

 10.8

 10.0

 9.6

 9.7

 9.1

 10.2

 11.1

 10.9

 10.8

 10.5

 11.0

 11.4

 11.5

 11.5

 11.0

 10.5

 10.2

 10.6

 10.7

 10.9

 10.8

 10.9

 11.0

 11.1

 11.0

 10.8

 10.8

 10.8

 10.8

 10.6

 10.6

 10.2

 9.3

 9.4

 9.0

 8.7

 8.7

 10.2

 10.6

 10.4

 10.2

 10.4

 11.0

 11.3

 11.0

 10.5

 9.9

 10.0

 10.2

 10.3

 11.1

 11.0

 11.1

 11.2

 11.2

 11.1

 10.9

 11.1

 11.1

 10.9

 10.8

 10.7

 10.5

 9.8

 9.5

 9.4

 8.9

 9.4

 10.6

 10.8

 10.6

 10.4

 10.8

 11.3

 11.4

 11.3

 10.9

 10.2

 10.2

 10.4

 10.5

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

RIPON ON THE STANISLAUS RIVER

 ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS WATER TEMPERATURE, DEG DISSOLVED OXYZEN, PPM
### SUBCHAPTER II—COUNTERING RUSSIAN INFLUENCE IN EUROPE AND EURASIA
**Exhibit 31.2**

**CERTIFICATION**

I, Frederick C. Herbst, certify that:

1.             Ihave reviewed this Annual Report on Form 10-K of Clayton Holdings, Inc.;

2.             Basedon my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of amaterial fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statementsmade, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, notmisleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3.             Basedon my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial informationincluded in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financialcondition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, andfor, the periods presented in this report;

4.             Theregistrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishingand maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange ActRules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

(a)           Designed such disclosure controls andprocedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designedunder our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to theregistrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us byothers within those entities, particularly during the period in which thisreport is being prepared;

(b)           [Paragraph omitted in accordance withSEC transition instructions contained in SEC Release No. 34-47986];

(c)           Evaluated the effectiveness of theregistrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this reportour conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls andprocedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on suchevaluation; and

(d)           Disclosed in this report any changein the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurredduring the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter that has materiallyaffected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’sinternal control over financial reporting; and

5.             Theregistrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our mostrecent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to theregistrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board ofdirectors:

(a)           All significant deficiencies andmaterial weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control overfinancial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect theregistrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financialinformation; and

(b)           Any fraud, whether or not material,that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in theregistrant’s internal control over financial reporting.

Date: March 23, 2007
|            | By:        | /s/ Frederick C Herbst       |       |       |
|------------|------------|------------------------------|------------|------------|
|       | ** ** | **Frederick  C. Herbst**     | ** ** | ** ** |
| ** ** | ** ** | **Chief Financial  Officer** |       |       |

 

                

 

----
Opinion issued April 20, 2023

In The

Court of Appeals 

For The 

First District of Texas 

————————————

NO. 01-22-00633-CR

———————————

KEVIN RAYSHAUN BANKS, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the 12th District Court

Grimes County, Texas

Trial Court Case No. 18974

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Appellant, Kevin Rayshaun Banks, pleaded guilty to the felony offense of 

possession of a controlled substance in penalty group two in an amount of four grams 

or more but less than four hundred grams. See TEX. HEALTH & SAFETY CODE § 

481.116(d). In accordance with appellant’s plea agreement with the State, the trial 
2

court sentenced appellant to fifteen years’ imprisonment. Appellant, acting pro se, 

filed a notice of appeal. We dismiss the appeal.

In a plea-bargain case, a defendant may only appeal those matters that were 

raised by written motion filed and ruled on before trial or after getting the trial court’s 

permission to appeal. See TEX. CODE CRIM. PROC. art. 44.02; TEX. R. APP. P.

25.2(a)(2). An appeal must be dismissed if a certification showing that the defendant 

has the right of appeal has not been made part of the record. TEX. R. APP. P. 25.2(d); 

see Dears v. State, 154 S.W.3d 610, 613 (Tex. Crim. App. 2005). Here, the clerk’s 

record supports the trial court’s certification that this is a plea-bargain case and that 

appellant has no right of appeal. See TEX. R. APP. P. 25.2(a)(2), (d); Dears, 154 

S.W.3d at 615. Because appellant has no right of appeal, we must dismiss this appeal 

without further action. See Chavez v. State, 183 S.W.3d 675, 680 (Tex. Crim. App. 

2006) (“A court of appeals, while having jurisdiction to ascertain whether an 

appellant who plea-bargained is permitted to appeal by Rule 25.2(a), must dismiss a 

prohibited appeal without further action, regardless of the basis for the appeal.”).

Accordingly, we dismiss this appeal for lack of jurisdiction. We dismiss any 

pending motions as moot.

PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Justices Landau, Countiss, and Guerra.

Do not publish. TEX. R. APP. P. 47.2(b).
Exhibit 32.1

           Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 as Adopted
            Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

Solely for the purpose of Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, and
solely to the extent this certification is applicable to Amendment No. 1 to the
Quarterly Report of Warrantech Corporation (the "Company") on Form 10-Q (the
"Report"), the undersigned hereby certify that this Report fully complies with
the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934 and that the information contained in this Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.


Date: August 12, 2005                       /s/ JOEL SAN ANTONIO
                                            ------------------------------------
                                            Joel San Antonio
                                            Chairman, Chief Executive Officer
                                            and Director

Date: August 12, 2005                       /s/ RICHARD GAVINO
                                            ------------------------------------
                                            Richard Gavino
                                            Executive Vice President,
                                            Chief Financial Officer,
                                            Chief Accounting Officer, and
                                            Treasurer

                                       24
Exhibit 10b

                   AMENDMENT NO. 1 TO LEGAL SERVICES AGREEMENT

      Amendment No. 1, dated June 4, 1997, to that certain Legal Services
Agreement (the "Legal Services Agreement") between Bank Hapoalim B.M., an
Israeli banking corporation (the "Bank"), and Ampal-American Israel Corporation,
a New York corporation ("Ampal").

      WHEREAS, the Bank and Ampal are parties to the Legal Services Agreement
whereby the Bank makes use of the legal services of Mr. Lawrence Lefkowitz,
President of Ampal; and

      WHEREAS, the Bank and Ampal wish to amend the Legal Services Agreement by
increasing the compensation that the Bank pays Ampal in return for the use of
Mr. Lefkowitz's services.

      NOW, THEREFORE, it is agreed as follows:

      1.  All references to "Employee" or "Employees" in the Legal Services
Agreement or this Agreement shall be deemed to refer to Mr. Lefkowitz only
and not to Mr. Charles J. Ferris, who is no longer an Employee of Ampal.

      2. Section 1 of the Legal Services Agreement is hereby amended and
restated so that such Section 1 shall read in its entirety as follows:

      "The Employee will continue in his present position with Ampal, while at
      the same time performing legal services for the Bank estimated not to
      exceed 50% of his aggregate business hours, in exchange for compensation
      equal to $120,000 per annum, subject to upwards adjustment if the Bank
      requires more than 50% 
<PAGE>

      of Employee's aggregate business time. The Employee shall not be
      considered an employee of the Bank and shall continue to be an employee of
      Ampal.

      3.  Section 2 of the Legal Services Agreement is hereby deleted in its
entirety.

      4.  Sections 3-5 of the Legal Services Agreement are hereby renumbered
Sections 2-4.

      5. For purposes of Section 5 of the Legal Services Agreement, the address
of both the Bank and Ampal shall be 1177 Avenue of the Americas, New York, NY
10036.

      6.  This Agreement shall be effective as of January 1, 1996.

      7.  Except as otherwise amended by this Agreement, the Legal Services
Agreement shall remain in full force and effect.

      8. This Agreement may be executed by the parties hereto in one or more
counterparts, each of which together shall be deemed to constitute one and the
same instrument.

      IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have executed this Agreement as of the
date set forth above.

BANK HAPOALIM B.M.                        AMPAL-AMERICAN ISRAEL
                                          CORPORATION


By: /s/ Arie Abend                        /s/ Yehoshua Gleitman
    ----------------------------          --------------------------
 Name: Arie Abend                         Yehoshua Gleitman
 Title: Joint Managing Director           Chief Executive Officer
        and Regional Manager


By: /s/ Nikolas G. Kasatos
    ----------------------------
 Name: Nikolas G. Kasatos
 Title: Vice President
§ 404.1371 Evidence of membership in a uniformed service during the years 1957 through 1967. ( a ) *General.* When you file an application for a monthly benefit or lump-sum death payment based on the services of a member of a uniformed service during the years 1957 through 1967, you should submit evidence identifying the member's uniformed service and showing the period(s) he or she was on active duty during those years.
( b ) *Evidence we accept.* The evidence we will accept includes any official correspondence showing the member's status as an active service member during the appropriate period, a certification of service by the uniformed service, official earnings statements, copies of the member's Form W-2, and military orders, for the appropriate period.
Exhibit 32.1

           Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 as Adopted
            Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

Solely for the purpose of Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, and
solely to the extent this certification is applicable to Amendment No. 1 to the
Quarterly Report of Warrantech Corporation (the "Company") on Form 10-Q (the
"Report"), the undersigned hereby certify that this Report fully complies with
the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934 and that the information contained in this Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.


   Date: February 14, 2005      /s/ JOEL SAN ANTONIO
                                ------------------------------------------------
                                Joel San Antonio
                                Chairman, Chief Executive Officer and Director

   Date: February 14, 2005      /s/ RICHARD GAVINO
                                ------------------------------------------------
                                Richard Gavino
                                Executive Vice President, Chief Financial
                                Officer, Chief Accounting Officer, and Treasurer

                                       32
#### John H. Reichle, Respondent, v. Frank B. Hower, Impleaded with Bayard Mining and Leasing Company, Appellant.

Judgment affirmed, with costs. All concurred.