alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY HIGH

 188

 196

 220

 214

 221

 223

 235

 231

 227

 218

 211

 221

 211

 195

 192

 264

 195

 210

 194

 194

 183

 187

 192

 181

 198

 208

 216

 202

 203

 206

 261

 175

 177

 178

 180

 180

 1

 180

 182

 181

 180

 182

 181

 177

 182

 183

 185

 185

 180

 183

 18

 163

 172

 165

 156

 165

 127

 138

 122

 133

 138

 144

 180

 182

 186

 188

 191

 185

 199

 193

 192

 191

 188

 188

 186

 187

 187

 199

 188

 188

 188

 173

 171

 178

 177

 167

 178

 184

 180

 172

 167

 165

 191

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

JANUARY 2000 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: March 27, 2000

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

RIO VISTA ON THE SACRAMENTO RIVER
STEAM ELECTRIC CBI REPLACEMENT PAGE

EPA-HQ-OW-2009-0819

DCN: SE02089A1

THE FOLLOWING HAS BEEN REMOVED BECAUSE IT 

CONTAINS CONFIDENTIAL BUSINESS INFORMATION 

(CBI) PER 40 CFR PART 2, SUBPART B.
Electrical Conductivity, UMHOS WATER TEMPERATURE, DEG DISSOLVED OXYZEN, PPM

Day High Low Mean High Low Mean High Low Mean

1 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0

2 81 72 73 73.5 67.8 70.5 9.3 8.2 8.6

3 73 71 72 72.9 67.2 70.1 9.4 8.4 8.7

4 73 72 72 73.4 67.3 70.3 9.4 8.4 8.7

5 73 72 73 73.8 67.4 70.4 9.3 8.4 8.6

6 81 70 72 73.4 68.1 70.7 9.3 8.3 8.6

7 73 69 71 73.4 68.7 70.9 9.3 8.3 8.6

8 77 69 70 73.1 68.7 70.8 9.2 8.3 8.6

9 75 69 70 72.5 68.4 70.3 9.3 8.3 8.7

10 78 70 72 72.0 67.9 69.7 9.3 8.4 8.7

11 82 70 72 71.0 66.9 68.8 9.4 8.4 8.8

12 78 70 72 70.7 66.6 68.4 9.5 8.5 8.9

13 98 67 74 68.3 65.6 67.0 9.4 8.6 9.0

14 71 66 67 65.6 63.4 64.6 9.3 8.9 9.1

15 70 66 67 64.1 62.1 63.2 9.1 8.9 9.1

16 70 66 67 64.1 61.9 62.7 9.2 9.1 9.2

17 68 67 67 63.9 61.7 62.7 9.3 9.1 9.2

18 73 68 71 64.7 62.3 63.4 9.1 8.8 9.0

19 85 73 79 66.4 63.1 64.5 8.9 8.6 8.7

20 79 73 76 65.9 63.6 64.6 9.1 8.6 8.9

21 75 69 72 65.0 62.4 63.6 9.1 8.8 8.9

22 70 69 69 63.5 61.9 62.8 9.1 8.8 8.9

23 71 68 69 61.8 60.0 60.9 9.5 9.0 9.3

24 71 68 70 60.3 58.3 59.3 9.7 9.4 9.6

25 78 71 75 60.8 58.2 59.4 9.5 9.2 9.3

26 83 77 79 61.0 58.6 59.7 9.5 9.1 9.3

27 85 72 79 60.0 57.8 58.8 9.9 9.3 9.6

28 71 68 69 59.2 57.3 58.4 10.1 9.8 9.9

29 69 66 67 60.6 58.0 59.1 10.0 9.6 9.8

30 69 66 68 60.5 58.2 59.2 9.8 9.6 9.7

31 69 68 69 60.0 58.4 59.2 9.7 9.4 9.6

COMMENT(S):

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

Historical Archive and Report Database

Ripon on the Stanislaus River Water Quality

Period: October 2022 Run Date: 11/22/2022
#### § 369.2 Authority to grant written permission for use of the seal.

The Board hereby delegates authority to grant written permission for the use of the seal of the Railroad Retirement Board to the Director of Administration.
#### Charles Hudson, Respondent, v. Glens Falls Insurance Company, Appellant.

Judgment reversed and complaint dismissed, with costs, including costs of this appeal. That part of the 21st finding of fact, to the effect that the statements made by the adjuster to the plaintiff at the time of the settlement were misrepresentations, either of fact or law, is disapproved, and stricken out. Held, that the tenant had no insurable interest in that part of the hay destroyed which was necessary to winter out the stock. All Concurred.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY HIGH

 104

 98

 102

 105

 105

 102

 102

 103

 112

 114

 117

 107

 109

 111

 113

 112

 114

 106

 73

 64

 63

 65

 67

 72

 84

 101

 97

 107

 105

 121

 128

 96

 85

 95

 100

 100

 98

 96

 93

 95

 99

 97

 96

 104

 102

 103

 102

 106

 72

 63

 60

 62

 63

 64

 68

 73

 80

 89

 96

 92

 95

 122

 99

 92

 98

 102

 102

 100

 99

 96

 101

 102

 103

 101

 107

 107

 109

 106

 110

 86

 66

 62

 63

 64

 65

 70

 78

 89

 95

 100

 99

 108

 125

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

OCTOBER 2000 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: November 3, 2000

HIGH LOW MEAN

 68.1

 68.3

 66.9

 66.9

 66.2

 66.9

 66.3

 66.3

 65.1

 62.9

 61.1

 61.2

 61.6

 62.8

 62.7

 63.1

 63.4

 62.7

 61.2

 59.8

 59.0

 57.9

 57.4

 58.2

 58.6

 58.1

 59.6

 58.7

 58.9

 57.8

 57.8

 65.0

 65.4

 64.1

 63.9

 63.0

 63.6

 63.7

 63.2

 63.0

 61.0

 60.0

 59.0

 58.6

 59.2

 59.5

 60.1

 60.2

 60.7

 58.3

 58.6

 57.6

 56.5

 55.7

 55.9

 57.0

 57.5

 57.6

 57.5

 57.8

 56.3

 56.0

 66.7

 66.9

 65.4

 65.6

 64.9

 65.3

 65.1

 64.7

 64.2

 61.9

 60.5

 59.9

 60.1

 61.0

 61.3

 61.8

 62.0

 61.7

 59.6

 59.1

 58.3

 57.3

 56.6

 57.0

 57.7

 57.8

 58.4

 58.2

 58.3

 57.2

 56.9

HIGH LOW MEAN

 8.1

 8.1

 8.2

 8.4

 8.6

 8.4

 8.4

 8.5

 8.5

 8.3

 8.6

 8.4

 8.6

 8.4

 8.5

 8.3

 8.3

 8.3

 8.4

 8.4

 8.6

 8.6

 8.6

 8.4

 8.2

 9.1

 9.0

 8.9

 8.8

 8.8

 8.4

 7.6

 7.6

 7.8

 7.7

 8.0

 8.0

 8.0

 8.1

 8.0

 8.1

 8.2

 8.2

 8.2

 8.0

 8.1

 8.0

 8.0

 8.0

 8.2

 8.1

 8.3

 8.4

 8.4

 8.2

 7.8

 7.3

 8.7

 8.6

 8.6

 8.3

 8.1

 7.8

 7.8

 7.9

 8.1

 8.2

 8.1

 8.2

 8.2

 8.2

 8.2

 8.4

 8.3

 8.4

 8.3

 8.3

 8.2

 8.1

 8.2

 8.3

 8.3

 8.5

 8.5

 8.5

 8.3

 8.1

 8.2

 8.8

 8.8

 8.7

 8.6

 8.3

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

RIPON ON THE STANISLAUS RIVER

 ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS WATER TEMPERATURE, DEG DISSOLVED OXYZEN, PPM
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY HIGH

 18,814

 18,006

 17,579

 18,177

 17,927

 16,420

 17,607

 17,771

 18,203

 18,045

 18,888

 19,864

 18,211

 16,838

 15,735

 14,844

 15,765

 17,027

 17,202

 15,632

 15,246

 16,088

 14,650

 15,941

 15,609

 13,272

 15,073

 17,248

 16,070

 17,724

 15,088

 9,139

 6,331

 10,219

 9,750

 6,438

 9,853

 10,357

 9,955

 5,299

 6,545

 6,805

 6,544

 8,175

 7,299

 5,721

 5,643

 4,707

 7,661

 5,982

 7,901

 6,570

 5,506

 9,289

 5,582

 5,150

 5,392

 5,289

 5,352

 5,284

 8,024

 6,026

 13,949

 12,096

 13,974

 13,708

 12,152

 12,730

 13,388

 13,450

 12,346

 12,047

 13,144

 12,030

 12,828

 12,320

 10,572

 10,438

 10,179

 12,374

 11,960

 12,855

 11,600

 10,724

 12,052

 11,582

 10,824

 8,863

 10,730

 11,242

 10,605

 12,209

 10,849

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

AUGUST 2015 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: September 1, 2015

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

PITTSBURG TOP ON THE SACRAMENTO RIVER
No. 11,703.

#### Hart, et al. *v.*Monte Vista Building Association.

Decided July 5, 1927.

Proceeding to foreclose a real estate mortgage. Decree for plaintiff.

*Affirmed.*

1. Appeal and *Errob*— Findings. General findings of the trial court on .conflicting evidence, will not be disturbed on review.

2. *Mortgages*— Qmtelm/m, *Feed*— Merger. The doctrine of merger is not a rule of property j the question of merger depends on intent. In the instant ease it is held that a quitclaim deed by mortgagor to mortgagee did not merge the mortgage interest in fee, there being no such intent under the general findings of the trial court.

*Error to the District Court of Rio Grande County, Eon. J. C. Wiley, Judge.*

Mr. George M. Corlett, for plaintiffs in error.

Mr. Jesse Stephenson, Mr. Herbert W. Martin, for defendant in error.

*En Banc.*

Mr. Justice Denison

delivered the opinion of the court.

Dependant in error had a decree of foreclosure against plaintiffs in error, with a provision for execution against the defendants Hart, makers of the mortgage note, for any deficiency.

Marietta A. Hart was the owner of the mortgaged premises; she borrowed $800 of the building association, and she and Isaac Hart, her husband, gave a note and *205mortgage to secure its payment. They afterwards bor-' rowed on note and second mortgage $400 of one En Earl, since deceased, whose heirs are the other plaintiffs in error.

Being pressed for payment, Mrs. Hart, on payment to her by one Hecker of $125, gave a quitclaim deed of the mortgaged property to the association. She claims that, in consideration of this deed, the association agreed that its note was satisfied and assumed the $400 note, so that she was discharged of both debts: The court’s findings were general for plaintiff on conflicting evidence, so these claims cannot be maintained here.

She further claims that upon the delivery of the quitclaim deed the mortgage interest merged in the fee and was extinct. The doctrine of merger, however, is not a rule of property; the question of merger depends upon intent *(Shreve v. Harvey,*74 N. J. Eq. 336, 339, 70 Atl. 671; *Chase v. Van Meter,*140 Ind. 321, 39 N. E. 455; *Collinsville National Bank v. Esau,*74 Okl. 45, 47, 176 Pac. 514); and the court, by its general finding, has found that there was not an intent to merge. Neither can this claim, therefore, be maintained here.

Judgment affirmed.
### §2504a. Health care for volunteers at Peace Corps posts

#### (a) In general

The President shall ensure that each overseas post has the services of a medical office that is consistent in size and scope with the needs of the Peace Corps at such post, including, if necessary, by detailing to any such post the licensed medical staff of other United States departments, agencies, or establishments.

#### (b) Hiring criteria

In selecting medical officers and support staff for overseas Peace Corps posts, the Director of the Peace Corps shall hire well-qualified and capable personnel to support the effectiveness of health care for Peace Corps volunteers by evaluating each candidate's—

(1) medical training, experience, and accreditations or other qualifications;

(2) record of performance;

(3) administrative capabilities;

(4) understanding of the local language and culture;

(5) ability to work in the English language;

(6) interpersonal skills; and

(7) such other factors that the Director determines appropriate.

#### (c) Certain training

The Director of the Peace Corps shall ensure that each Peace Corps medical officer serving in a malaria-endemic country receives training in the recognition of the side effects of such medications.

#### (d) Review and evaluation

#### (1) In general

The Director of the Peace Corps, acting through the Associate Director of the Office of Health Services and the country directors, shall review and evaluate the performance and health care delivery of all Peace Corps medical staff, including medical officers, to—

(A) ensure compliance with all relevant Peace Corps policies, practices, and guidelines; and

(B) ensure that medical staff complete the necessary continuing medical education to maintain their skills and satisfy licensing and credentialing standards, as designated by the Director.

#### (2) Report to Congress

The Director of the Peace Corps shall include, in the annual Peace Corps congressional budget justification, a confirmation that the review and evaluation of all Peace Corps medical staff required under paragraph (1) has been completed.

#### (e) Antimalarial drugs

The Director of the Peace Corps shall consult with experts at the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention regarding recommendations for prescribing malaria prophylaxis, in order to provide the best standard of care within the context of the Peace Corps environment.

(Pub. L. 87–293, title I, §5A, as added Pub. L. 115–256, title I, §101(a)(2), Oct. 9, 2018, 132 Stat. 3651.)
### JUDGMENT 

## Court of Appeals First District of Texas

NO. 01

- 13

- 00782

- CV
BANDIER REALTY PARTN ERS, LLC AND SWITCHB ACK VENTURES, LLC , Appellant s
V.
SSC OPPORTUNITY PART NERS, LLC , Appellee Appeal from the 215th District Court of Harris County. (Tr. Ct. No. 2011

- 43194 ).
This case is an appeal from the final judgment signed by the trial court on June 14, 2013 . After submitting the case on the appellate record and the arguments properly raised by the parties, the Court holds that there was reversible error in the trial court’s judgment in the following respect: the judgment awarded actual damages without legal ly sufficient evidence of causation. Accordingly, the Court reverses the trial court’s judgment and renders judgment that SSC Opportunity Partners , LLC take nothing from Bandier Realty Partners, LLC and Switchback Ventures, LLC

.
The Court orders that the appellee, SSC Opportunity Partners, LLC, pay all appellate costs.

The Court orders that this decision be certified below for observance.Judgment rendered August 27, 2015

.

Panel consists of Chief Justice Radack and Justices Higley and Massengale. Opinion delivered by Justice Massengale.
### SUBCHAPTER II—INTERNATIONAL ATOMIC ENERGY AGENCY
<PAGE>
                                                                 EXHIBIT 10.13

                             PROMISSORY NOTE (#5)


$20,000.00                                                     August 22, 1995


     FOR VALUE RECEIVED, the undersigned promises to pay to Painter Group
Corporation "PGC", at San Diego, California, or such other place as the
holder of this Note may from time to time in writing direct, the principal
sum of Twenty Thousand Dollars ($20,000.00) with interest from the above date
at the rate of ten percent (10%) per annum.  Interest shall be calculated on
the basis of a three hundred sixty (360) day year and, if the principal sum
is paid earlier than the date due, on the actual number of days that
such principal was outstanding. Principal and interest will be
payable in six months.

     Principal and interest shall be payable in lawful money of the United
States of America and all or any part of the unpaid balance of principal may
be repaid at any time, without premium or penalty.

     The undersigned hereby waives presentment, protest, notice of protest,
demand for payment, notice of dishonor and any and all other notices and
demands in connection with the delivery, acceptance, performance, default or
enforcement of this Note.  No delay by the holder in exercising any power or
right hereunder shall operate as a waiver of any power or right.

     The entire sum shall become immediately due and payable without further
notice, demand or presentment, at the option of the holder of this Note, upon
the occurrence at any time of any one or more of the following events
("events of default"): (a) an assignment by the undersigned for the benefit
of its creditors; (b) the initiation of involuntary bankruptcy proceedings
against the undersigned, which proceedings are not dismissed within 60 days
thereafter of (c) the filing by the undersigned of a petition under the
Federal Bankruptcy Code or comparable state laws for the reorganization,
arrangement or other judicial protection upon insolvency.

     The foregoing option to accelerate the indebtedness evidenced by this
Note may be exercised by PGC at any time after the occurrence of any of
the events of default.  The failure to exercise the foregoing option on the
occurrence of one or more of such events of default shall not prevent the
exercise upon the reoccurrence of such events of default or upon the
occurrence of any other event of default.

     The undersigned agrees to pay all out-of-pocket expenses (including
reasonable attorneys' fees and legal expenses) incurred by PGC hereunder
in connection with enforcing the obligations of the undersigned hereunder.

     This Note shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws
of the State of California.

                                                 TCS ENTERPRISES, INC.



8-22-95                                          /s/ James B. Kylstad
--------------------                             --------------------------
Date                                             James B. Kylstad
§ 350.4 Exemptions. ( a ) Unless a lower percentage or dollar amount limitation on garnishment is provided by applicable state or local law, the portion of any payment due to an individual which is subject to legal process to enforce any order for the support of any person shall not exceed 65 percent. Where the individual is supporting a spouse or dependent child, other than a spouse or child with respect to whose support that legal process is issued, the portion subject to legal process is reduced by 10 percent. Where the alimony or support arrearage is less than 12 weeks old, the portion subject to legal process is reduced by 5 percent. If a lower limitation is provided by applicable state or local law, then that lower limitation shall be applied.
( b ) In the absence of some evidence to the contrary, it will be assumed that the defendant is not supporting a spouse or dependent child other than a spouse or child with respect to whose support the legal process is issued.
( c ) In any case in which a recurring benefit payment is reduced, whether due to a recovery by the Board of an overpayment or for some other reason, below the rate at which it is ordinarily paid, any applicable exemptions shall be applied to the amount of the reduced benefit which is actually paid.
( d ) For purposes of the applicability of exemptions, amounts deducted for medicare premiums must first be subtracted from the annuity amount.
[45 FR 28314, Apr. 29, 1980]
§ 404.361 When a natural child is dependent. ( a ) *Dependency of natural child.* If you are the insured's natural child, as defined in § 404.355, you are considered dependent upon him or her, except as stated in paragraph (b) of this section.
( b ) *Dependency of natural child legally adopted by someone other than the insured.* ( 1 ) Except as indicated in paragraph (b)(2) of this section, if you are legally adopted by someone other than the insured (your natural parent) during the insured's lifetime, you are considered dependent upon the insured only if the insured was either living with you or contributing to your support at one of the following times: ( i ) When you applied;
( ii ) When the insured died; or
( iii ) If the insured had a period of disability that lasted until he or she became entitled to disability or old-age benefits or died, at the beginning of the period of disability or at the time he or she became entitled to disability or old-age benefits.
( 2 ) You are considered dependent upon the insured (your natural parent) if: ( i ) You were adopted by someone other than the insured after you applied for child's benefits; or
( ii ) The insured had a period of disability that lasted until he or she became entitled to old-age or disability benefits or died, and you are adopted by someone other than the insured after the beginning of that period of disability.
[64 FR 14608, Mar. 26, 1999]
**Exhibit32.1**

 

Certification of PrincipalExecutive Officer

Pursuant to

Section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. 1350)

 

In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-Kfor the year ended December 31, 2005 (the “Report”) of Federal ServicesAcquisition Corporation (the “Registrant”), as filed with the Securities andExchange Commission on the date hereof, I, Joel R. Jacks, Chairman and ChiefExecutive Officer of the Registrant, hereby certify that:

 

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirementsof Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended;and

 

(2) The information contained in the Report fairlypresents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results ofoperations of the Registrant.

 

 
| Date:  March 30, 2006 | By:    | /s/    Joel R. Jacks   |   |
|-----------------------|--------|------------------------------------------------------|--------|
|                  |   | **Joel R. Jacks**                                    |
|                  |   | **Chairman and Chief Executive Officer**             |
|                  |   | ** **                                           |
|                  |   | **(Principal Executive Officer)**                    |

 

----
```

[Congressional Bills 114th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 4010 Engrossed in House (EH)]

<DOC>
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
114th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 4010

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
  at 522 North Central Avenue in Phoenix, Arizona, as the ``Ed Pastor 
                             Post Office''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. ED PASTOR POST OFFICE.

    (a) Designation.--The facility of the United States Postal Service 
located at 522 North Central Avenue in Phoenix, Arizona, shall be known 
and designated as the ``Ed Pastor Post Office''.
    (b) References.--Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, 
paper, or other record of the United States to the facility referred to 
in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``Ed Pastor 
Post Office''.

            Passed the House of Representatives June 21, 2016.

            Attest:

                                                                 Clerk.
114th CONGRESS

  2d Session

                               H. R. 4010

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
  at 522 North Central Avenue in Phoenix, Arizona, as the ``Ed Pastor 
                             Post Office''.
```