alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          AUG-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             SEP-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               FEB-28-1998
<CASH>                                           5,237
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   55,799
<ALLOWANCES>                                    13,177
<INVENTORY>                                     38,824
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                          37,635
<DEPRECIATION>                                  13,373
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 138,433
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0
<BONDS>                                         78,599
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           210
<OTHER-SE>                                      21,920
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   138,433
<SALES>                                         23,877
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                32,015
<CGS>                                            4,264
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   21,157
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                13,506
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               3,478
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (2,648)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (2,648)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (2,648)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.13)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.13)
        

</TABLE>
Exhibit 32.2  CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002  In connection with the Quarterly Report of ALCO, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ended September 30, 2007 (the "Report"), I, Yip Kam Ming, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that: 1) The Report fully complies with the requirement of Section 13(a) or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and 2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the Company's financial position and results of operations.  /s/ Yip Kam MingYip Kam Ming, Chief Financial Officer November 14, 2007
# C_2012341EN.01000501.xml

| 9.11.2012 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 341/5 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

9.11.2012

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 341/5

---

Authorisation for State aid pursuant to Articles 107 and 108 of the TFEU

Cases where the Commission raises no objections

(Text with EEA relevance, except for products falling under Annex I to the Treaty)

2012/C 341/03

| Date of adoption of the decision | 26.9.2012 |
| --- | --- |
| Reference number of State Aid | SA.34831 (12/N) |
| Member State | Czech Republic |
| Region | Karlovarský | — |
| Title (and/or name of the beneficiary) | Pravidla pro poskytování finančních příspěvků na hospodaření v lesích z rozpočtu Karlovarského kraje – odboru životního prostředí a zemědělství |
| Legal basis | 1) | Pravidla pro poskytování finančních příspěvků na hospodaření v lesích z rozpočtu Karlovarského kraje – odboru životního prostředí a zemědělství |

Date of adoption of the decision

26.9.2012

Reference number of State Aid

SA.34831 (12/N)

Member State

Czech Republic

Region

Karlovarský

—

Title (and/or name of the beneficiary)

Pravidla pro poskytování finančních příspěvků na hospodaření v lesích z rozpočtu Karlovarského kraje – odboru životního prostředí a zemědělství

Legal basis

1)

Pravidla pro poskytování finančních příspěvků na hospodaření v lesích z rozpočtu Karlovarského kraje – odboru životního prostředí a zemědělství

| 2) | Zákon č. 129/2000 Sb., o krajích, ve znění pozdějších předpisů |
| --- | --- |

2)

Zákon č. 129/2000 Sb., o krajích, ve znění pozdějších předpisů

| 3) | Zákon č. 289/1995 Sb., o lesích a o změně a doplnění některých zákonů (lesní zákon) |
| --- | --- |

3)

Zákon č. 289/1995 Sb., o lesích a o změně a doplnění některých zákonů (lesní zákon)

Type of measure

Scheme

—

Objective

Forestry

Form of aid

Direct grant

Budget

| | Overall budget: CZK 70 million |
| --- | --- |

Overall budget: CZK 70 million

| | Annual budget: CZK 10 million |
| --- | --- |

Annual budget: CZK 10 million

Intensity

100 %

Duration (period)

1.1.2013-31.12.2019

Economic sectors

Forestry and logging

Name and address of the granting authority

| Karlovarský kraj |
| --- |
| Závodní 353/88 |
| 630 21 Karlovy Vary |
| ČESKÁ REPUBLIKA |

Karlovarský kraj

Závodní 353/88

630 21 Karlovy Vary

ČESKÁ REPUBLIKA

Other information

—

The authentic text(s) of the decision, from which all confidential information has been removed, can be found at:

http://ec.europa.eu/competition/elojade/isef/index.cfm

---
Exhibit 99.3


                                                     [LOGO] Countrywide(R)
                                                        ---------------
                                                          HOME LOANS

                                                      400 Countrywide Way
                                              Simi Valley, California 93065-6298

March 10, 2006


                              OFFICER'S CERTIFICATE


I, Joseph Candelario, hereby certify that I am the First Vice President, Loan
Administration of Countrywide Home Loans, Inc., fka Countrywide Funding
Corporation and that I am authorized to provide this certification on behalf of
Countrywide Home Loans Servicing L.P. I further certify, with respect to the
Pooling and Servicing Agreements for Countrywide Home Loans Servicing L.P.
("Servicer"), the following:

I have reviewed the activities and performance of the Servicer during the fiscal
year ended December 31, 2005 under the Pooling and Servicing Agreements referred
to on Exhibit A, attached hereto and made a part hereof and, to the best of my
knowledge, based on my review, the Servicer has fulfilled all of its duties,
responsibilities or obligations under the Pooling and Servicing Agreements
throughout the fiscal year.


/s/ Joseph Candelario                                         March 10, 2006
---------------------                                         --------------
Joseph Candelario                                             Date
First Vice President
Compliance Officer
Loan Administration


<PAGE>

                                   EXHIBIT A

            MSAC 2005-HE1
            MSAC 2005-HE2
            MSAC 2005-HE3
            MSAC 2005-HE4
            MSAC 2005-HE5
            MSAC 2005-HE6
            MSAC 2005-HE7
            MSHEL 2005-2
            MSAC 2005-WMC1
            MSAC 2005-WMC2
            MSAC 2005-WMC3
            MSAC 2005-WMC4
            MSAC 2005-WMC5
            MSAC 2005-WMC6
            MSAC 2005-NC2
            IXIS 2005-HE1
            IXIS 2005-HE2
            IXIS 2005-HE3
#### § 408.212 What happens if you are a qualified individual already residing outside the United States?

If you meet all the requirements for qualification listed in § 408.202 and if none of the conditions listed in § 408.204 exist, we will ask you for documents and information to establish your residence outside the United States. If you establish that you are residing outside the United States, we will send you a letter telling you that you are entitled to SVB and the first month for which SVB payments can be made to you. The letter will also tell you the amount of your monthly benefit payments, whether your payments are reduced because of your other benefit income, and what rights you have to a reconsideration of our determination.
Exhibit 8.1

List of Our Subsidiaries*

Beijing Yuande Bio-Medical Engineering Co., Ltd., incorporated in the PRC

Beijing Bio-Ekon Biotechnology Co., Ltd., incorporated in the PRC

Beijing GP Medical Technologies Co., Ltd., incorporated in the PRC

CMED Technologies Ltd., incorporated in the British Virgin Islands

CMED Diagnostics Ltd., incorporated in
the British Virgin Islands

CMED ECLIA Diagnostics Ltd., incorporated in the British Virgin Islands

CMED HIFU Development Corporation, incorporated in the state of Washington, USA

CMED (HK) Limited, incorporated in Hong Kong



| | * | Our subsidiaries that, in the aggregate, would not be a significant subsidiary as defined in rule 1-02(w) of Regulation S-X as of March 31, 2008 are omitted from
this list.
| | - | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
§ 295.7 Miscellaneous. ( a ) *Disbursement cycle.* In honoring and complying with a court decree or property settlement, the Board shall not be required to disrupt its normal disbursement cycle, despite any special schedule of accrual or payment of amounts due the spouse or former spouse set forth in the decree or settlement. A decree or settlement received too late to be honored during the disbursement cycle in which it was received shall be honored with respect to the next payment due the employee.
( b ) *Liability for payments.* Neither the Board nor any of its employees shall be liable with respect to any payment made to any individual from moneys due from or payable by the Board pursuant to a court decree or property settlement regular on its face, if such payment is made in accordance with this part.
( c ) *Liability for disclosures.* No employee of the Board whose duties include responding to requirements contained in this part shall be subject under any law to any disciplinary action or civil or criminal liability or penalty for, or on account of, any disclosure of information made by such employee in connection with the performance of the employee's duties in making such response.
( d ) *Applicable law.* For purposes of a proceeding under this part, the Board will apply the law of the jurisdiction in which the court decree or property settlement was issued unless it comes to the attention of the Board that the state of issuance has no contact with the plaintiff or defendant in the action; in which case, the Board may, in its sole discretion, apply the law of any jurisdiction with significant interest in the matter.
( e ) *Erroneous payments.* ( 1 ) If a spouse or former spouse receives a payment pursuant to this part from an employee's benefit, and the Board later determines that the employee was not entitled to all or part of those benefits for any month, the amount of the employee's benefits which was paid to the spouse or former spouse in excess of the amount which was actually payable shall be an erroneous payment to the spouse or former spouse within the meaning of section 10 of the Railroad Retirement Act.
( 2 ) Where all documentation required by this part is in the Board's records pertaining to the employee prior to the time the employee annuity is awarded, but where the Board due to clerical oversight fails to withhold the amount awarded by the court order, then the Board shall begin deduction from the employee annuity with the month the error is discovered, and shall pay the amount which should have been withheld pursuant to this part to the spouse or former spouse. The amount paid to the spouse or former spouse representing months for which the amount under the order was not timely withheld shall be an erroneous payment to the employee within the meaning of section 10 of the Railroad Retirement Act. This section shall not apply where the Board has attempted to contact the spouse or former spouse at the time the employee annuity is awarded pursuant to § 295.4(d).
[51 FR 12845, Apr. 16, 1986, as amended at 73 FR 47046, Aug. 13, 2008]
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent *

except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision **

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

 FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

MARIA LUISA SARABIA

RODRIGUEZ,

 Petitioner,

 v.

ERIC H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General,

 Respondent.

No. 08-73515

Agency Nos. A095-447-730

MEMORANDUM*

On Petition for Review of an Order of the

Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted October 19, 2010** 

Before: O’SCANNLAIN, TALLMAN, and BEA, Circuit Judges.

Maria Luisa Sarabia Rodriguez, a native and citizen of Mexico, petitions for

review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ order dismissing her appeal from an

immigration judge’s decision denying her application for cancellation of removal.

We have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We review for substantial evidence

FILED

OCT 26 2010

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
2 08-73515

findings of fact, Urzua Covarrubias v. Gonzales, 487 F.3d 742, 744 (9th Cir.

2007), and review de novo questions of law, Altamirano v. Gonzales, 427 F.3d

586, 591 (9th Cir.2005). We deny the petition for review.

Substantial evidence supports the agency’s determination that Sarabia

Rodriguez was ineligible for cancellation of removal as an alien smuggler for

knowingly attempting to smuggle her brother into the United States. See 8 U.S.C.

§ 1182(a)(6)(E)(i); Altamirano, 427 F.3d at 592; see also Gui v. INS, 280 F.3d

1217, 1225 (9th Cir. 2002). 

Sarabia Rodriguez’s due process rights were not violated by the admission

of her brother’s sworn statement and his Form I-213 Record of Deportable/

Inadmissible Alien because the documents were probative and their admission was

fundamentally fair. See Espinoza v. INS, 45 F.3d 308, 310-11 (9th Cir. 1995); 

Hernandez-Guadarrama v. Ashcroft, 394 F.3d 674, 681 (9th Cir. 2005). 

Sarabia Rodriguez’s contention that her statement to border officers was the result

of coercion is unavailing because the agency did not rely on her statement.

PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED.
**CERTIFICATE OF INCORPORATION****OF****NATIONAL HEALTHCARE OF DECATUR, INC.*** * * * *     1. The name of the corporation is NATIONAL HEALTHCARE OF DECATUR, INC.     2. The address of its registered office in the State of Delaware is Corporation Trust Center,1209 Orange Street, in the City of Wilmington, County of New Castle. The name of its registeredagent at such address is The Corporation Trust Company.     3. The nature of the business or purposes to be conducted or promoted is to engage in anylawful act or activity for which corporations may be organized under the General Corporation Law ofDelaware.     4. The total number of shares of stock which the corporation shall have authority to issue isOne Thousand (1,000) common and the par value of each of such shares is One Dollar ($1.00)amounting in the aggregate to One Thousand Dollars ($1,000.00).     5A. The name and mailing address of each incorporator is as follows:   NAME MAILING ADDRESSD. A. Hampton Corporation Trust Center  1209 Orange Street  Wilmington, Delaware 19801   J. A. Grodzicki Corporation Trust Center  1209 Orange Street  Wilmington, Delaware 19801   S. J. Queppet Corporation Trust Center  1209 Orange Street  Wilmington, Delaware 19801     5B. The name and mailing address of each person, who is to serve as a director until the firstannual meeting of the stockholders or until a successor is elected and qualified, is as follows:   NAME MAILING ADDRESSStephen L. Phelps 444 North Oates Street  Dothan, Alabama 36303     6. The corporation is to have perpetual existence.     7. In furtherance and not in limitation of the powers conferred by statute, the board ofdirectors is expressly authorized to make, alter or repeal the by-laws of the corporation.     8. Elections of directors need not be by written ballot unless the by-laws of the corporationshall so provide.
 

 
     Meetings of stockholders may be held within or without the State of Delaware, as the by-lawsmay provide. The books of the corporation may be kept (subject to any provision contained in thestatutes) outside the State of Delaware at such place or places as may be designated from time totime by the board of directors or in the by-laws of the corporation.     9. The corporation reserves the right to amend, alter, change or repeal any provisioncontained in this certificate of incorporation, in the manner now or hereafter prescribed bystatute, and all rights conferred upon stockholders herein are granted subject to this reservation.     WE, THE UNDERSIGNED, being each of the incorporators hereinbefore named, for the purpose offorming a corporation pursuant to the General Corporation Law of the State of Delaware, do makethis certificate, hereby declaring and certifying that this is our act and deed and the factsherein stated are true, and accordingly have hereunto set our hands this 23rd day of May, 1986.       D. A. Hampton D. A. Hampton         J. A. Grodzicki J. A. Grodzicki         S. J. Queppet S. J. Queppet  726143049Book 371 Page 41RECEIVED FOR RECORDMay 23, 1986   /s/ Michael Harkins Michael Harkins, Secretary of State  Received for RecordMay 28, 1986LEO J. DUGAN, Jr., Recorder
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY ELEVATION

 238.47

 238.47

 238.47

 238.47

 238.47

 238.47

 238.47

 238.47

 238.47

 238.47

 238.47

 238.47

 238.47

 238.47

 238.47

 238.47

 238.47

 238.47

 238.47

 238.47

 238.47

 238.47

 238.47

 238.47

 238.47

 238.47

 238.47

 238.47

 238.47

 238.47

 238.47

 296

 296

 296

 296

 296

 296

 296

 296

 296

 296

 296

 296

 296

 296

 296

 296

 296

 296

 296

 296

 296

 296

 296

 296

 296

 296

 296

 296

 296

 296

 296

STORAGE

+0

+0

+0

+0

+0

+0

+0

+0

+0

+0

+0

+0

+0

+0

+0

+0

+0

+0

+0

+0

+0

+0

+0

+0

+0

+0

+0

+0

+0

+0

+0

CHANGE

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 263

 290

 286

 195

 19

 16

 103

 98

 16

 95

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 4,590

 4,590

 4,590

 4,610

 4,610

 4,590

 4,590

 4,560

 4,590

 4,590

 4,560

 4,610

 4,590

 4,590

 4,590

 4,590

 4,590

 4,560

 4,590

 4,590

 4,590

 4,660

 4,590

 4,770

 4,900

 5,560

 4,790

 4,790

 5,210

 5,000

 4,880

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

DECEMBER 2008 RED BLUFF DIVERSION RESERVOIR DAILY OPERATIONS RUN DATE: January 23, 2009

IN LAKE

CANAL

 ACRE-FEET

TOTALS +0 1,381 145,510

ACRE-FEET +0 2,739 288,619

SUMMARY

RELEASE (ACRE-FEET)

TOTAL 291,614

 296

RELEASE

RIVER

CORNING TO SACTO

CANAL

RELEASE C.F.S

TEHAMA

COLUSA

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 27

 36

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 9

 36

 0

 0

 0

 0

 21

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 129

 256

CORNING CANAL 256

TEHAMA-COLUSA CANAL 2,739

TO SACTO RIVER 288,619
§ 72.24 Corporate surety bonds. ( a ) Corporate surety bonds may be given only with surety companies holding certificates of authority from the Secretary of the Treasury as acceptable sureties on Federal bonds, subject to the limitations prescribed by Treasury Department Circular No. 570 (Companies Holding Certificates of Authority as Acceptable Sureties on Federal Bonds and as Acceptable Reinsuring Companies), and subject to such amendments as may be issued from time to time.
( b ) Treasury Department Circular No. 570 is published in the Federal Register yearly as of the first workday of July. As they occur, interim revisions of the circular are published in the Federal Register. Copies may be obtained from the Audit Staff, Bureau of Government Financial Operations, Department of the Treasury, Washington, DC 20226.
(July 30, 1947, Ch. 390, 61 Stat. 648, as amended (6 U.S.C. 6, 7); Aug. 16, 1954, Ch. 736, 68A Stat. 847, as amended (26 U.S.C. 7101))
[T.D. ATF-92, 46 FR 46914, Sept. 23, 1981]
(No. 6769

#### Sun Oil Company, Claimant, *vs.*State of Illinois, Department of Transportation, Respondent.

*Opinion filed February 8, 1974.*

Sun Oil Company, Claimant, pro se.

*218William J. Scott, Attorney General; Howard W. Feldman, Assistant Attorney General, for Respondent.

Per Curiam.
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

JAVIER MURRIETA, 

Plaintiff-Appellant, 

 v. 

JANE McDUFFEE, Registered Nurse; et al., 

Defendants-Appellees.

No. 20-16771 

D.C. No. 4:19-cv-00423-JAS-PSOT 

MEMORANDUM*

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the District of Arizona

James Alan Soto, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted June 21, 2021**

Before: SILVERMAN, WATFORD, and BENNETT, Circuit Judges.

Arizona state prisoner Javier Murrieta appeals pro se from the district court’s 

judgment dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action alleging deliberate indifference to 

his serious medical needs. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We 

review de novo the district court’s dismissal under 28 U.S.C. § 1915A. Resnick v. 

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent 

except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.

** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision 

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

FILED

JUN 29 2021

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
 2 20-16771 

Hayes, 213 F.3d 443, 447 (9th Cir. 2000). We affirm. 

The district court properly dismissed Murrieta’s action because Murrieta 

failed to allege facts sufficient to show that defendants disregarded an excessive 

risk to Murrieta’s abdominal pain and other gastrointestinal issues. See Toguchi v. 

Chung, 391 F.3d 1051, 1056-60 (9th Cir. 2004) (a prison official is deliberately 

indifferent only if he or she knows of and disregards an excessive risk to inmate 

health; medical malpractice, negligence, or a difference of opinion concerning the 

course of treatment does not amount to deliberate indifference). 

AFFIRMED.
### §2152j–2. Training requirements regarding the participation of women in conflict prevention and peace building

#### (a) Foreign Service

The Secretary of State, in conjunction with the Administrator of the United States Agency for International Development, shall ensure that all appropriate personnel (including special envoys, members of mediation or negotiation teams, relevant members of the civil service or Foreign Service, and contractors) responsible for or deploying to countries or regions considered to be at risk of, undergoing, or emerging from violent conflict obtain training, as appropriate, in the following areas, each of which shall include a focus on women and ensuring meaningful participation by women:

(1) Conflict prevention, mitigation, and resolution.

(2) Protecting civilians from violence, exploitation, and trafficking in persons.

(3) International human rights law and international humanitarian law.

#### (b) Department of Defense

The Secretary of Defense shall ensure that relevant personnel receive training, as appropriate, in the following areas:

(1) Training in conflict prevention, peace processes, mitigation, resolution, and security initiatives that specifically addresses the importance of meaningful participation by women.

(2) Gender considerations and meaningful participation by women, including training regarding—

(A) international human rights law and international humanitarian law, as relevant; and

(B) protecting civilians from violence, exploitation, and trafficking in persons.

(3) Effective strategies and best practices for ensuring meaningful participation by women.

(Pub. L. 115–68, §6, Oct. 6, 2017, 131 Stat. 1204.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section was enacted as part of the Women, Peace, and Security Act of 2017, and not as part of the Foreign Assistance Act of 1961 which comprises this chapter.