alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 7
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM DECEMBER 31,
1998 FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1998
<DEBT-HELD-FOR-SALE>                        36,968,374
<DEBT-CARRYING-VALUE>                                0
<DEBT-MARKET-VALUE>                                  0
<EQUITIES>                                           0
<MORTGAGE>                                   1,930,734
<REAL-ESTATE>                                        0
<TOTAL-INVEST>                              47,284,587
<CASH>                                         120,332
<RECOVER-REINSURE>                         105,155,284
<DEFERRED-ACQUISITION>                       2,460,183
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             158,380,034
<POLICY-LOSSES>                            139,496,503
<UNEARNED-PREMIUMS>                                  0
<POLICY-OTHER>                               2,397,219
<POLICY-HOLDER-FUNDS>                        2,850,960
<NOTES-PAYABLE>                                562,500
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                  1,850,000
<COMMON>                                           876
<OTHER-SE>                                   5,533,499
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>               158,380,034
<PREMIUMS>                                   2,581,834
<INVESTMENT-INCOME>                          2,026,734
<INVESTMENT-GAINS>                           (664,327)
<OTHER-INCOME>                                  41,969
<BENEFITS>                                   2,590,050
<UNDERWRITING-AMORTIZATION>                    109,786
<UNDERWRITING-OTHER>                         5,899,627
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 30,313
<INCOME-TAX>                                    44,302
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (13,989)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (13,989)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  (28.42)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  (35.52)
<RESERVE-OPEN>                                 924,702
<PROVISION-CURRENT>                                  0
<PROVISION-PRIOR>                                    0
<PAYMENTS-CURRENT>                           1,022,250
<PAYMENTS-PRIOR>                             1,083,921
<RESERVE-CLOSE>                              2,397,219
<CUMULATIVE-DEFICIENCY>                              0
        


</TABLE>
### §80r. Findings

Congress finds that—

(1) since its founding, the United States has grown into a symbol of democracy and freedom around the world, and the legacy of African Americans is rooted in the very fabric of the democracy and freedom of the United States;

(2) there exists no national museum within the Smithsonian Institution that—

(A) is devoted to the documentation of African American life, art, history, and culture; and

(B) encompasses, on a national level—

(i) the period of slavery;

(ii) the era of Reconstruction;

(iii) the Harlem renaissance;

(iv) the civil rights movement; and

(v) other periods associated with African American life, art, history, and culture; and

(3) a National Museum of African American History and Culture would be dedicated to the collection, preservation, research, and exhibition of African American historical and cultural material reflecting the breadth and depth of the experiences of individuals of African descent living in the United States.

(Pub. L. 108–184, §2, Dec. 16, 2003, 117 Stat. 2676.)

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Short Title

Pub. L. 108–184, §1, Dec. 16, 2003, 117 Stat. 2676, provided that: "This Act [enacting this subchapter] may be cited as the 'National Museum of African American History and Culture Act'."
Exhibit 4.11 Amendment No 1 Equity Incentive Plan






EXHIBIT 4.11


AMENDMENT NO. 1 TO THE
CLEARONE, INC. 
EQUITY INCENTIVE PLAN
AMENDED AND RESTATED EFFECTIVE DECEMBER 12, 2014


WHEREAS, ClearOne, Inc. (the “Company”) adopted and maintains the ClearOne, Inc. Equity  Incentive Plan (the “Plan”), as amended and restated effective as of December 12, 2014, to provide an opportunity for its eligible employees and certain independent contractors to earn incentive awards in consideration for their services;
WHEREAS, pursuant to Section 21 of the Plan, the Company’s Board of Directors has retained the right to amend the Plan and now desires to amend the Plan to clarify awards of dividend equivalents available for issuance under the Plan.
NOW THEREFORE, effective as of December 12, 2014, the Plan is hereby amended as follows:
1.    Section 6(a) is hereby amended by replacing the second sentence set forth therein with the following:
“No Participant shall have any rights as a shareholder with respect to any Shares subject to Options hereunder until said Shares have been issued, except that the Administrator may authorize and grant dividend equivalents with respect to such Shares.”
2.    Section 9(b) is hereby amended by replacing the first sentence set forth therein with the following:
“If the Administrator so chooses, it may grant dividend equivalents, which shall consist of a grant to a Participant made in connection with any Award otherwise granted under the Plan, payable in Shares or a cash payment equal to all or a portion of the dividends the Participant would have received had the Participant owned the number of Shares subject to the Award on the date established by the Administrator or the Board, as applicable.”
*    *    *
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, ClearOne, Inc. has caused this Amendment No. 1 to the Plan to be executed by its duly authorized representatives on this 12 day of December 2014.


	
				
	By:
	/s/ Zeynep Hakimoglu
	By:
	/s/ Narsi Narayanan

	 
	Zeynep Hakimoglu
	 
	Narsi Narayanan

	 
	President and Chief Executive Officer
	 
	Senior Vice President of Finance and Corporate Secretary
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY HIGH

 23,371

 22,417

 22,011

 23,057

 23,809

 22,752

 24,520

 24,443

 24,657

 23,178

 22,756

 20,994

 21,469

 22,643

 24,263

 28,661

 25,612

 25,410

 25,591

 24,544

 22,941

 20,087

 18,617

 15,603

 11,462

 8,602

 5,579

 5,246

 9,718

 16,103

 9,764

 11,542

 10,336

 8,983

 9,497

 9,680

 9,526

 9,695

 10,563

 10,258

 10,956

 11,643

 12,038

 11,117

 11,262

 12,299

 13,786

 11,992

 10,811

 9,706

 8,813

 7,344

 6,757

 5,678

 5,310

 3,546

 1,535

 656

 520

 450

 490

 351

 16,150

 15,564

 15,402

 15,440

 15,930

 15,978

 17,025

 17,231

 17,178

 17,634

 18,488

 16,606

 16,015

 16,372

 17,085

 19,717

 18,174

 18,045

 17,413

 16,717

 15,253

 13,380

 12,422

 10,466

 7,489

 3,830

 1,866

 1,486

 2,365

 4,901

 3,150

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

JANUARY 2000 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: March 27, 2000

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

PORT CHICAGO TOP IN SUISUN BAY
EXHIBIT 99.1
  
  JEFFERIES & COMPANY, INC.By:

/s/
Melissa ToomeyName:
    Melissa ToomeyTitle:
    Vice President and Assistant General Counsel
#### Priyantha ULUWITA, Petitioner, v. Alberto R. GONZALES, Attorney General, Respondent.

No. 04-72440.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted Feb. 13, 2006.*

Filed Feb. 17, 2006.

*175Michael K. Ungar, Esq., Simmons & Ungar, San Francisco, CA, for Petitioner.

NVL-District Counsel, Office of the District Counsel, Las Vegas, NV, Ronald E. LeFevre, Chief Counsel, Office of the District Counsel, San Francisco, CA, Helen J. Brunner, Esq., Office of the U.S. Attorney, Seattle, WA, for Respondent.

Before: FERNANDEZ, RYMER, and BYBEE, Circuit Judges.

*

 The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

MEMORANDUM **

Priyantha Uluwita, a native and citizen of Sri Lanka, petitions for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) decision affirming an immigration judge’s order denying his applications for asylum, withholding of removal, and relief under the Convention Against Torture (“CAT”). We have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We review for substantial evidence and may reverse only if the evidence compels a contrary conclusion. *Rostomian v. INS,*210 F.3d 1088, 1089 (9th Cir. 2000). We deny the petition.

Uluwita testified that he worked as a loan evaluation manager and that members of the Liberation Tigers of Tamil Eelam threatened him with violence and beat him because they desired to secure loans for Tamil applicants. There is no evidence that Uluwita was perceived as having any particular political opinion, or that the people who assaulted Uluwita were motivated by anything other than financial interests. Consequently, substantial evidence supports the BIA’s decision that petitioner failed to establish past persecution or a well-founded fear of future persecution on account of an enumerated ground. *See Molino-Estrada v. INS,*293 F.3d 1089, 1094-95 (9th Cir.2002) (alien must show that persecutors imputed a political opinion to him to succeed on asylum claim).

Because Uluwita failed to demonstrate he was eligible for asylum, it follows that he did not satisfy the more stringent standard for withholding of removal. *See Singh-Kaur v. INS,*183 F.3d 1147, 1149 (9th Cir.1999).

Uluwita also fails to establish a CAT claim because he did not show that it was more likely than not that he would be tortured if he returned to Sri Lanka. *See Kamalthas v. INS,*251 F.3d 1279, 1283 (9th Cir.2001).

The voluntary departure period was stayed, and that stay will expire upon issuance of the mandate. *See Desta v. Ashcroft,*365 F.3d 741 (9th Cir.2004).

PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED.

**

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
A-AA+Skip to content

                  - Home
                  - Compendium Statistics
                  - Event
                  - Archives
                  - Glossary
                  - Help
                  - Contact
                  - Research on Disability

Annual Disability Statistics Compendium

              - Home /
              - Compendium Statistics /
              - Veterans /
              - 6.5 Poverty Gap - Civilian Veterans Ages 18-64 Years Living in the Community for the U.S.

## Table 6.5: Poverty Rate—Percent (%) of Civilians in Poverty Among Civilian Veterans Ages 18 to 64 Years Living in the Community for the United States and States by Disability Status: 2012

----

----

 

----

#### 2012 Disability Compendium

                        - Home
                        - Compendium Statistics                           - Population and Prevelance
                          - Employment
                          - Time Trend Population Statistics
                          - Poverty
                          - Earnings
                          - Veterans
                          - Health Insurance Coverage
                          - Health
                          - Social Security Administration Programs
                          - Medicaid and Medicare
                          - Special Education
                          - Vocational Rehabilitation
                          - Federal Government Spending and Employment
                          - International Disability Statistics
                          - Population Statistics: Disability Type
                        - Event
                        - Archives                           - 2012 Compendium Statistics
                        - Glossary
                        - Help
                        - Contact
                        - Research on Disability

#### Funding for this project is made possible by:

 The Research and Training Center on Disability Statistics and Demographics (StatsRRTC), which is funded by the U.S. Department of Education, National Institute for Disability and Rehabilitation Research, under cooperative agreements H133B080012.

#### Stay Connected

**Institute on Disability**10 West Edge Drive, Suite 101Durham, NH 03824603.862.4320 | relay: 711 | [email protected]www.iod.unh.edu

© 2013. Institute on Disability.University of New Hampshire.
### §2418. Repealed. Pub. L. 95–424, title VI, §604, Oct. 6, 1978, 92 Stat. 961

Section, Pub. L. 87–195, pt. III, §658, as added Pub. L. 92–226, pt. III, §304(b), Feb. 7, 1972, 86 Stat. 32, related to certification by the Comptroller General of the release of previously impounded funds prior to the expenditure of funds appropriated to carry out the purposes of this chapter.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date of Repeal

Repeal effective Oct. 1, 1978, see section 605 of Pub. L. 95–424, set out as an Effective Date of 1978 Amendment note under section 2151 of this title.
#### Manitou Beach Rod and Gun Club, Appellant, v. William Burger, Respondent.

Judgment affirmed, with costs. Held, that the Burnett deed conveyed the land in dispute. All concurred.
COURT OF A PPEAL S EI GHTH D I STRI CT OF TEXAS ELPASO, TEXAS
J ORGE DE LA VEGA , Appellant,
v. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee
. § § § § § § No. 08-09-00308- CR

Appea l from the County Criminal Court at L aw No. 1 of El Paso County , Texas (TC# 20080C010228)

MEMORAN DUM OP INION Appellant Jorge De L a Ve g a has f iled a notice of

appea l from an or der de ny ing his motion to s uppress e vidence and his motion to establish probable ca use for arr est. The r ecor d
curr ently on file in this Court does not indi cate that the trial cour t has enter ed a f

inal order of conviction in the under lying c ase. B y letter dated J anuar

y 13, 2010, the cler

k of this Court notified Appellant’s a

ppointed counsel of our

intent to dism iss the appea l for wa nt of jurisdiction, and invited Appellant to file a r esponse within ten day s to demonstrate g round for continuing the appea l. See T E X .R.A P P .P. 42.4. Appellant has not responde d to the Court’s notice. In order

to perfe ct an a

ppeal in a c riminal case , a def endant must file a notice of appe al “within 30 day s after

the day sentenc e is imposed or suspende d in open cour t, or afte r the da

y the trial court e nters an a

ppeala ble orde r . . . .” SeeT E X .R.A P P .P. 26.2(a)( 1). An a ppellate c ourt does not have jurisdiction to consider interlocutory order s, such as a

n order denying a

motion tosuppress, unless that jurisdiction has bee n expressly g rante d by

law. See T E X .C O D E C R I M .P R O C .AN N . art. 44.02 (V ernon 2008) ; Bridle v. State , 16 S.W .3d 906, 907 (Tex.App.--F ort Worth 2000, no pet.). As this appeal wa s not taken fr om a final a ppeala ble orde r, and the rec ord does not contain such, w e dismiss the appea l for wa nt of jurisdiction.

Fe bruar y 10, 2010 DAVI D WEL L I NGTONCHEW, C hief Just ice Be fore Chew, C.J ., McClure, a nd Rivera, JJ
. (Do Not Publish)

-2-
#### Maurice G. Hickey, Appellant, v. Edwin W. Fiske, as Mayor, and Others, Respondents.

Order affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements. No opinion. Jenks, P. J., Burr, Carr, Stapleton and Putnam, JJ., concurred.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY HIGH

 12,962

 12,573

 12,213

 11,533

 14,162

 14,928

 15,562

 17,573

 18,156

 17,072

 17,093

 14,790

 15,700

 15,023

 15,057

 15,679

 17,149

 17,302

 18,261

 17,139

 17,756

 17,254

 16,829

 15,581

 13,725

 13,666

 15,953

 16,915

 15,423

 13,964

 12,814

 5,084

 4,992

 5,171

 4,505

 4,880

 5,306

 5,463

 6,239

 6,706

 5,129

 6,853

 6,407

 6,746

 6,420

 6,666

 7,618

 7,978

 7,985

 6,317

 7,440

 8,389

 8,058

 8,046

 8,384

 7,683

 6,791

 6,623

 9,255

 6,962

 6,157

 5,068

 8,645

 8,372

 7,965

 7,250

 8,435

 8,981

 10,046

 10,722

 11,542

 11,282

 10,842

 10,621

 10,600

 10,056

 10,338

 11,070

 11,417

 12,066

 11,744

 12,401

 12,543

 12,207

 12,469

 12,588

 11,257

 10,408

 11,762

 12,350

 10,642

 10,294

 9,668

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

OCTOBER 2013 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: February 20, 2014

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

PITTSBURG TOP ON THE SACRAMENTO RIVER
# C_2016055EN.01013801.xml

| 12.2.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 55/138 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

12.2.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 55/138

---

P7_TA(2013)0194

Period for the eighth election of representatives to the European Parliament by direct universal suffrage*

European Parliament legislative resolution of 21 May 2013 on the draft Council decision fixing the period for the eighth election of representatives to the European Parliament by direct universal suffrage (07279/2013 — C7-0068/2013 — 2013/0802(CNS))

(Consultation)

(2016/C 055/30)

The European Parliament,

The European Parliament

| — | having regard to the Council draft (07279/2013), |
| --- | --- |

—

having regard to the Council draft (07279/2013),

| — | having regard to Article 11(2), second subparagraph, of the Act concerning the election of the members of the European Parliament by direct universal suffrage (1), pursuant to which the Council consulted Parliament (C7-0068/2013), |
| --- | --- |

—

having regard to Article 11(2), second subparagraph, of the Act concerning the election of the members of the European Parliament by direct universal suffrage (1), pursuant to which the Council consulted Parliament (C7-0068/2013),

1

| — | having regard to its resolution of 22 November 2012 on the elections to the European Parliament in 2014 (2), |
| --- | --- |

—

having regard to its resolution of 22 November 2012 on the elections to the European Parliament in 2014 (2),

2

| — | having regard to Rules 55 and 46(1) of its Rules of Procedure, |
| --- | --- |

—

having regard to Rules 55 and 46(1) of its Rules of Procedure,

| — | having regard to the report of the Committee on Constitutional Affairs (A7-0138/2013), |
| --- | --- |

—

having regard to the report of the Committee on Constitutional Affairs (A7-0138/2013),

| 1. | Approves the Council draft; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Approves the Council draft;

| 2. | Calls on the Council to notify Parliament if it intends to depart from the text approved by Parliament; |
| --- | --- |

2.

Calls on the Council to notify Parliament if it intends to depart from the text approved by Parliament;

| 3. | Asks the Council to consult Parliament again if it intends to substantially amend the text approved by Parliament; |
| --- | --- |

3.

Asks the Council to consult Parliament again if it intends to substantially amend the text approved by Parliament;

| 4. | Instructs its President to forward its position to the Council, and, for information, to the governments and parliaments of the Member States and of the Republic of Croatia. |
| --- | --- |

4.

Instructs its President to forward its position to the Council, and, for information, to the governments and parliaments of the Member States and of the Republic of Croatia.

---

(1)  Annexed to Council Decision 76/787/ECSC, EEC, Euratom of 20 September 1976 (OJ L 278, 8.10.1976, p. 1), as amended by Council Decision 93/81/Euratom, ECSC, EEC (OJ L 33, 9.2.1993, p. 15), and Council Decision 2002/772/EC, Euratom (OJ L 283, 21.10.2002, p. 1).

1

(2)  Texts adopted, P7_TA(2012)0462.

2

---
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

DAY HIGH

 114

 114

 114

 116

 115

 118

 120

 127

 130

 131

 136

 134

 131

 133

 131

 130

 134

 133

 129

 128

 129

 128

 127

 130

 128

 0

 122

 123

 124

 121

 110

 110

 107

 110

 109

 109

 109

 112

 115

 117

 120

 123

 121

 118

 125

 122

 122

 122

 118

 117

 115

 114

 113

 114

 117

 0

 113

 113

 114

 111

 111

 111

 111

 112

 112

 112

 113

 118

 120

 123

 126

 126

 124

 125

 127

 126

 127

 126

 122

 121

 120

 119

 117

 120

 121

 0

 116

 116

 117

 115

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

SEPTEMBER 2019 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: October 8, 2019

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

RIO VISTA ON THE SACRAMENTO RIVER
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY HIGH

 5,801

 6,088

 6,557

 4,882

 5,030

 5,533

 5,945

 6,527

 7,414

 5,127

 5,219

 5,901

 6,382

 6,403

 5,329

 6,471

 6,801

 6,462

 6,054

 5,146

 5,404

 4,741

 5,564

 5,633

 6,743

 7,580

 5,357

 7,484

 8,406

 8,223

 8,185

 1,207

 1,024

 973

 952

 727

 666

 640

 733

 885

 694

 715

 794

 879

 863

 852

 777

 892

 862

 706

 575

 469

 435

 515

 673

 796

 1,018

 785

 848

 1,120

 1,030

 887

 2,471

 2,326

 2,406

 1,991

 1,967

 2,247

 2,862

 3,414

 3,055

 2,191

 2,236

 2,532

 2,691

 2,637

 2,337

 2,356

 2,845

 2,312

 2,241

 1,983

 1,903

 2,066

 2,439

 2,605

 2,980

 3,481

 2,553

 2,932

 3,145

 3,052

 3,261

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

OCTOBER 2019 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: November 13, 2019

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

PITTSBURG BOTTOM ON THE SACRAMENTO RIVER