alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**EXHIBIT31.2**

I, Michael L. Paxton,Chief Financial Officer of Intrusion Inc., certify that:

(1)         Ihave reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of Intrusion Inc.:

(2)         Basedon my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a materialfact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, inlight of the circumstances under which such statements were made, notmisleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

(3)         Basedon my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial informationincluded in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financialcondition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, andfor, the periods presented in this report;

(4)         Theregistrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishingand maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange ActRules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

(a)     Designedsuch disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls andprocedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that materialinformation relating to the registrant, including its consolidatedsubsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularlyduring the period in which this report is being prepared;

(b)    Evaluatedthe effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures andpresented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of thedisclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by thisreport based on such evaluation; and

(c)     Disclosedin this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter thathas materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, theregistrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and

(5)         Theregistrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on ourmost recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to theregistrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board ofdirectors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

(a)     Allsignificant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation ofinternal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely toadversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize andreport financial information; and

(b)    Anyfraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees whohave a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting.
| Date:  August 10,  2007 | /s/ Michael L. Paxton   |   |
|-----------------------------------|-------------------------|--------|
|                              | Michael L. Paxton       |   |
|                              | Chief Financial Officer |   |

 

1

----
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY HIGH

 156

 194

 171

 168

 143

 158

 164

 169

 199

 228

 260

 233

 215

 238

 268

 240

 257

 224

 186

 216

 250

 288

 329

 395

 444

 434

 425

 460

 427

 469

 473

 105

 104

 103

 99

 93

 103

 97

 100

 100

 113

 116

 113

 112

 117

 131

 124

 117

 113

 108

 117

 108

 116

 119

 125

 125

 139

 139

 128

 141

 136

 131

 130

 136

 136

 128

 123

 127

 123

 134

 146

 154

 166

 159

 155

 162

 173

 171

 163

 159

 150

 156

 154

 174

 193

 231

 256

 257

 260

 260

 254

 260

 263

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

JULY 2007 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: August 2, 2007

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

SAN ANDREAS ON THE SAN JOAQUIN RIVER
[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 76 (Wednesday, April 20, 2011)]
[Notices]
[Page 22169]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2011-9589]



[[Page 22169]]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY

Internal Revenue Service


Open Meeting of the Area 4 Taxpayer Advocacy Panel (Including the 
States of Illinois, Indiana, Kentucky, Michigan, Ohio, and Wisconsin)

AGENCY: Internal Revenue Service (IRS), Treasury.

ACTION: Notice of meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: An open meeting of the Area 4 Taxpayer Advocacy Panel will be 
conducted. The Taxpayer Advocacy Panel is soliciting public comments, 
ideas, and suggestions on improving customer service at the Internal 
Revenue Service.

DATES: The meeting will be held Tuesday, June 21, 2011.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ellen Smiley at 1-888-912-1227 or 414-
231-2360.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Notice is hereby given pursuant to Section 
10(a)(2) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, 5 U.S.C. App. (1988) 
that a meeting of the Area 4 Taxpayer Advocacy Panel will be held 
Tuesday, June 21, 2011, at 1 p.m. Central Time via telephone 
conference. The public is invited to make oral comments or submit 
written statements for consideration. Due to limited conference lines, 
notification of intent to participate must be made with Ellen Smiley. 
For more information please contact Ms. Smiley at 1-888-912-1227 or 
414-231-2360, or write TAP Office Stop 1006MIL, 211 West Wisconsin 
Avenue, Milwaukee, WI 53203-2221, or post comments to the Web site: 
http://www.improveirs.org.
    The agenda will include various IRS issues.

    Dated: April 15, 2011.
Shawn Collins,
Director, Taxpayer Advocacy Panel.
[FR Doc. 2011-9589 Filed 4-19-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4830-01-P
###### Editorial Note on Part 416

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 416 appear at 68 FR 53509, Sept. 11, 2003.

#### § 416.1422 Notice of a reconsidered determination.

We shall mail a written notice of the reconsidered determination to the parties at their last known address. We shall state the specific reasons for the determination and tell you and any other parties of the right to a hearing. If it is appropriate, we will also tell you and any other parties how to use the expedited appeals process.

[45 FR 52096, Aug. 5, 1980. Redesignated at 51 FR 306, Jan. 3, 1986]
Exhibit
32.2




Certification
of Principal Financial Officer


Pursuant
to


Section
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. 1350)




In
connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31,
2008, as amended by Amendment No. 1 thereto (the “Report”) of ATS Corporation
(the “Registrant”), as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the
date hereof, I, Pamela A. Little, Senior Vice President and Chief Financial
Officer of the Registrant, hereby certify that:




(1)           The
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and




(2)           The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the
Registrant.




Date:
      February 24, 2010
              By:
              /s Pamela A. LittlePamela
      A. Little
                Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
                (Principal Financial
      Officer)
EXHIBIT 32.1

Certification of CEO and CFO Pursuant to

18 U.S.C. Section 1350,

as Adopted Pursuant to

Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In connection with the Annual Report
on Form 10-K of BlackRock Kelso Capital Corporation and subsidiaries (the Company) for the annual period ended December 31, 2014 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), James
R. Maher, as Chief Executive Officer of the Company, and Corinne Pankovcin, as Chief Financial Officer of the Company, each hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the consolidated financial
condition and consolidated results of operations of the Company.



|                      |  |                                                  
|--------------------- |  | -------------------------------------------------
|/s/ James R. Maher   
|Name:                 |  | James R. Maher                                   
|Title:                |  | Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer
|Date:                 |  | March 5, 2015                                    
|                     
|/s/ Corinne Pankovcin
|Name:                 |  | Corinne Pankovcin                                
|Title:                |  | Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer            
|Date:                 |  | March 5, 2015
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

DAY HIGH

 70

 71

 75

 77

 75

 75

 76

 76

 78

 69

 77

 81

 72

 74

 69

 73

 66

 71

 72

 69

 65

 74

 73

 71

 74

 82

 81

 92

 80

 87

 65

 64

 65

 65

 64

 63

 65

 64

 65

 64

 63

 61

 62

 62

 62

 60

 60

 59

 59

 60

 60

 61

 61

 61

 62

 68

 69

 69

 67

 66

 67

 66

 68

 67

 66

 65

 67

 66

 67

 66

 66

 65

 63

 64

 63

 63

 61

 62

 61

 61

 61

 63

 63

 63

 67

 71

 74

 76

 68

 69

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

APRIL 2008 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: May 5, 2008

HIGH LOW MEAN

 56.7

 56.2

 57.3

 57.9

 57.5

 57.7

 57.7

 57.0

 56.8

 58.4

 59.4

 59.9

 60.6

 60.1

 58.2

 57.4

 58.4

 58.8

 58.2

 56.7

 56.4

 56.4

 56.6

 57.0

 59.1

 61.2

 63.6

 63.6

 63.2

 61.2

 54.0

 54.8

 54.4

 55.2

 54.7

 54.9

 55.0

 54.7

 53.9

 54.9

 56.5

 57.0

 57.6

 58.4

 55.9

 54.8

 55.4

 56.4

 56.1

 54.6

 53.9

 54.7

 54.6

 54.3

 55.1

 57.1

 59.1

 61.3

 60.0

 58.8

 55.2

 55.6

 55.8

 56.6

 56.2

 56.3

 56.3

 55.8

 55.4

 56.6

 57.9

 58.5

 59.2

 59.2

 57.1

 56.2

 56.9

 57.7

 57.2

 55.8

 55.2

 55.5

 55.6

 55.7

 57.0

 59.2

 61.3

 62.8

 61.6

 60.0

HIGH LOW MEAN

 9.7

 9.5

 9.5

 9.3

 9.3

 9.3

 9.3

 9.3

 9.4

 9.2

 8.8

 8.9

 9.0

 8.9

 9.3

 9.6

 9.5

 9.3

 9.3

 9.6

 9.7

 9.5

 9.4

 9.4

 9.3

 8.7

 8.3

 8.5

 8.8

 8.9

 9.2

 9.2

 9.0

 8.9

 8.9

 8.9

 8.9

 8.9

 9.0

 8.6

 8.5

 8.6

 8.6

 8.7

 9.0

 9.2

 9.1

 8.9

 9.0

 9.3

 9.3

 9.2

 9.1

 9.1

 8.6

 8.2

 7.8

 6.4

 8.5

 8.6

 9.5

 9.4

 9.3

 9.1

 9.1

 9.1

 9.1

 9.1

 9.2

 9.0

 8.7

 8.8

 8.8

 8.8

 9.2

 9.4

 9.3

 9.1

 9.2

 9.4

 9.5

 9.4

 9.3

 9.3

 9.0

 8.5

 8.1

 8.1

 8.6

 8.7

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

RIPON ON THE STANISLAUS RIVER

 ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS WATER TEMPERATURE, DEG DISSOLVED OXYZEN, PPM
§ 266.3 Information considered in determining whether to make representative payments. In determining whether to make representative payment, the Board may consider the following information: ( a ) *Evidence of legal guardianship.* Evidence of the appointment of a legal guardian or other person legally vested with the care of the person or estate of an incompetent or a minor shall be a certified copy of the court's determination.
( b ) *Medical evidence.* The Board may use medical evidence, when such is available, to help determine whether an annuitant is capable of managing or directing the management of benefit payments. For example, a statement by a physician or other medical professional based upon his or her recent examination of the annuitant and his or her knowledge of the annuitant's present condition will be used in the Board's determination, if it includes information concerning the nature of the annuitant's illness, the annuitant's chances for recovery and the opinion of the physician or other medical professional as to whether the annuitant is able to manage or direct the management of benefit payments.
( c ) *Other evidence.* The Board may also consider statements of relatives, friends, and other people in a position to know and observe the annuitant, which contain information helpful to the Board in deciding whether the annuitant is able to manage or direct the management of benefit payments.
Electrical Conductivity, UMHOS

Day High Low Mean

1 136 132 134

2 137 133 135

3 141 134 136

4 144 135 138

5 144 136 139

6 145 138 140

7 143 139 141

8 141 139 140

9 141 138 139

10 142 138 139

11 145 138 139

12 149 138 140

13 158 139 143

14 177 140 146

15 254 142 155

16 355 142 174

17 539 144 192

18 605 144 212

19 158 145 149

20 160 146 150

21 152 146 148

22 151 146 148

23 159 147 150

24 245 148 163

25 235 149 164

26 462 152 190

27 652 157 218

28 738 161 230

29 865 161 244

30 841 162 255

COMMENT(S):

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

Historical Archive and Report Database

Rio Vista On The Sacramento River

Period: November 2023 Run Date: 12/8/2023
|   | 1. |   | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and                    |
|--------|----|--------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   | 2. |   | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. |

|                              | India Globalization Capital, Inc. |                                                                                                                                        |
|-----------------------------------|-----------------------------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|                              |                              |                                                                                                                                        |   |
| Date: January 28, 2011  | By:                               | /s/ John B. Selvaraj                    |   |
|                              |                              | John B. Selvaraj                                                                                                                            |   |
|                              |                              | Treasurer, Principal Accounting Officer                                                                                                     |   |
494 P.2d 185

#### STATE of New Mexico, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Ernest MONTANO, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 761.

Court of Appeals of New Mexico.

Feb. 4, 1972.

*524Wycliffe V. Butler, Butler & Colberg, Albuquerque, for defendant-appellant.

' David L. Nbrvell, Atty. Gen., Winston Roberts-Hohl, Asst. Atty. Gen., Sante Fe, for plaintiff-appellee.

OPINION

HENDLEY, Judge.

Convicted of burglary defendant appeals. We reverse on defendant’s third point regarding an insanity instruction.

During the course of the trial a psychiatrist testified that defendant “ * * * gave a history of being mentally ill. * * I would have considered him [defendant] rnentally ill then [at the time of the criminal act]” and defendant “ * * * would riot have been ablé to distinguish right from wrong. * * * ”

. :The defendant’s tendered but refused insanity instruction stated in part:

> ■“Insanity, as the word is used in these Instructions, means such a diseased or deranged condition of the mental faculties of a person as to render that person incapable of knowing the nature and quality of his act, or of distinguishing between right and wrong in relation to the act with which he is charged, or of’ such character as to deprive one of the powers of his will which would enable him to prevent himself from committing the act even though he might know the nature and quality of the act and that it is "wrong.” >■.,■••

The trial court instructed the jury on the insanity issue as follows:

> “You must find the defendant, Ernest Montano, not guilty if you find that his act of entering the structure was the product of insanity.

> “You are instructed that insanity means a true disease of the mind, normally extending over a considerable period of time, as distinguished from a sort of momentary insanity arising from the pressure of circumstances.”

The State does not argue that the trial court’s instruction was correct nor does it argue that the defendant’s requested instruction was erroneous. See State v. James, 83 N.M. 263, 490 P.2d 1236 (Ct.App.1971) and cases cited therein for discussion of insanity. The State argues that State v. Flowers, 83 N.M. 113, 489 P.2d 178 (1971) and State v. Compton, 57 N.M. 227, 257 P.2d 915 (1953) apply. The State asserts that since defendant did not point out the error in the court’s instruction which purportedly defined insanity, defendant cannot now complain even though he did submit a correct instruction. *Compton*and *Flozvers*are not applicable.

 Here, the court’s instruction failed to cover the elements of insanity. State v. James, supra. Defendant’s requested instruction contained those elements. By the submission of a proper instruction the defendant alerted the trial court to the omission in its instruction. See State v. Rodriguez, 81 N.M. 503, 469 P.2d 148 (1970). The matter was preserved for review. Section 21-1-1 (51) (2) (h), N. M.S.A.1953 (Repl.Vol.1970).

The trial court’s failure to instruct on the elements of insanity being erroneous, the case is reversed with directions to grant defendant a new trial.

It is so ordered.

WOOD, C. J., and COWAN, J., concur.
#### In the Matter of the Application of Edward J. Belford, Appellant, for a Writ of Mandamus Directed to Alfred E. Steers, as President of the Borough of Brooklyn of the City of New York, and Others, Respondents.

Order affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements. Ho opinion. Jenks, P. J., Thomas, Carr, Rich and Putnam, JJ., concurred.
Editorial Note on Part 416
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 416 appear at 68 FR 53509, Sept. 11, 2003.

§ 416.1218 Exclusion of the automobile. ( a ) *Automobile; defined.* As used in this section, the term *automobile* includes, in addition to passenger cars, other vehicles used to provide necessary transportation.
( b ) *Limitation on automobiles.* In determining the resources of an individual (and spouse, if any), automobiles are excluded or counted as follows: ( 1 ) *Total exclusion.* One automobile is totally excluded regardless of value if it is used for transportation for the individual or a member of the individual's household.
( 2 ) *Other automobiles.* Any other automobiles are considered to be nonliquid resources. Your equity in the other automobiles is counted as a resource. (See § 416.1201(c).)
[40 FR 48915, Oct. 20, 1975, as amended at 44 FR 43266, July 24, 1979; 50 FR 42687, Oct. 22, 1985; 70 FR 6345, Feb. 7, 2005]
DRAFT Temperature and Release Summary for Shasta and Trinity - June 2010

Sacramento River Water Temperatures in Degrees F

Day Collected from CDEC (California Data Exchange Center) in CFS

Control

TCD SHD minus Point Shasta Spring Crk 

Wt. TCD 5/25 to Generation Powerplant 

Avg. (Diff) Shd Spp Kwk Bsf Jlf Bnd Rdb Lws Ccr Igo El 815 Release 

May Avg 51.4 50.3 51.2 51.2 54.0 55.2 55.4 56.5 47.3 52.4 52.3 3,301 665 

June

1 49.8 (0.8) 49.0 52.1 51.7 56.6 57.9 57.8 58.9 49.1 54.1 55.3 9,594 158 

2 50.5 (1.0) 49.5 52.2 50.1 53.2 54.8 55.3 58.0 49.2 51.1 54.7 13,804 253 3 50.9 (1.2) 49.7 52.4 50.1 52.1 53.3 53.2 54.6 49.0 50.8 54.4 14,536 49 4 50.8 (1.1) 49.7 52.8 50.2 52.5 54.0 53.9 55.3 48.6 51.0 54.2 15,147 58 5 50.9 (1.3) 49.6 52.6 50.3 52.6 54.0 54.0 55.3 48.4 51.1 54.9 14,282 47 6 50.6 (1.0) 49.6 52.3 50.6 53.0 54.4 54.2 55.4 48.6 51.5 55.8 13,411 691 7 50.5 (1.0) 49.5 52.7 50.6 53.7 55.4 55.3 56.6 49.1 51.8 55.3 13,727 51 8 50.3 (1.0) 49.3 52.9 50.7 53.8 55.5 55.4 56.9 49.5 51.9 54.0 12,062 47 9 49.6 (0.8) 48.8 52.8 50.7 51.9 56.1 56.1 57.8 49.9 52.0 53.9 10,555 47 

10 49.4 (0.9) 48.5 52.8 50.0 54.1 55.8 55.7 57.5 50.6 51.5 53.2 10,630 47 11 49.4 (0.9) 48.5 52.9 49.7 53.3 55.1 55.0 56.8 50.8 51.1 54.0 9,440 47 12 49.2 (0.8) 48.4 53.2 49.7 53.5 55.3 55.4 57.3 50.5 51.2 55.4 10,646 47 13 49.5 (1.0) 48.5 53.2 49.8 53.8 55.9 55.9 57.9 50.0 51.2 56.2 10,200 47 14 49.5 (0.9) 48.6 53.2 49.9 53.8 56.1 56.1 58.2 50.2 51.3 57.3 10,837 47 15 49.6 (0.9) 48.7 53.3 50.0 53.7 55.8 55.9 57.9 50.5 51.5 57.1 10,158 47 16 49.4 (0.8) 48.6 53.0 50.0 53.3 55.2 55.2 57.1 50.8 51.2 56.0 9,298 778 17 49.2 (0.8) 48.4 53.3 50.3 53.5 55.1 55.0 56.6 51.0 51.6 59.8 10,031 124 18 49.1 (0.8) 48.3 53.2 49.7 53.3 55.0 55.1 57.1 51.1 51.1 57.2 9,566 948 19 49.2 (0.8) 48.4 53.0 49.9 53.4 55.1 55.1 57.1 50.6 51.2 57.2 9,220 936 20 49.3 (0.8) 48.5 53.2 50.0 53.4 55.2 55.2 57.1 50.1 51.3 57.1 9,199 1,217 

21 9 3 8 3 0 2 3 6 1 0 2 1 6 3 9 226 1 293 

Mean Daily Relea

21 49.3 (0.9) 48.4 53.5 50.2 53.6 55.4 55.4 57.1 50.2 51.6 57.3 9,226 1,293 

22 49.6 (1.3) 48.3 53.5 50.1 53.5 55.4 55.7 57.5 49.7 51.2 57.4 9,044 1,289 23 49.5 (1.1) 48.4 53.4 50.0 53.5 55.5 56.0 57.4 49.6 51.0 58.2 9,764 703 24 50.0 (1.4) 48.6 53.4 49.9 53.3 55.4 55.9 57.8 49.6 50.8 58.0 9,963 703 25 49.7 (1.2) 48.5 53.6 50.0 53.4 55.4 55.9 57.3 49.9 51.1 57.6 9,443 1,015 26 49.6 (1.1) 48.5 53.6 50.3 54.0 56.1 56.6 57.9 50.2 51.5 58.0 9,308 862 27 49.6 (1.1) 48.5 53.7 50.3 54.1 56.3 56.9 58.5 50.3 51.6 58.4 9,800 1,007 28 49.6 (1.0) 48.6 53.7 50.3 54.0 56.1 56.6 58.3 50.4 51.5 58.7 9,658 1,155 29 50.0 (1.3) 48.7 53.9 50.4 53.8 55.8 56.3 58.0 50.4 51.6 58.2 9,779 1,154 30 49.7 (1.0) 48.7 54.0 50.4 53.8 55.7 56.2 57.7 50.4 51.5 57.6 10,646 1,014 31 0.0 

Avg 49.8 48.8 53.1 50.2 53.5 55.4 55.5 57.2 49.9 51.4 56.4 #### 10,766 529 Tot cfs 322,974 15,881 Tot af 640,619 31,500 

# = Station out of service ^ - estimated (7 hours or less) ? = Avg. includes estimated data! = 17 hours or less of readings & = 18 to 23 hours of reading ND = No hourly readings or incorrect 

Control Point: Jellys Ferry 5/25/2010 to current