alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
CENTRAL VALLEY OPERATIONS OFFICE

CHINOOK SALMON REPORT

February 2008

Note:Bold numbers are not verified by DFG & DWR Preliminary Data - Subject to Change

Winter Run Chinook Salmon Estimated Loss (Incidental Take) Spring Run Chinook Salmon Estimated Loss (Incidental Take) 

Daily SWP Daily CVP Daily Combined Season Combined Daily SWP Daily CVP Daily Combined Season Combined Dail

Tagged* No Tag Tagged* No Tag Tagged* No Tag Tagged* No Tag Tagged No Tag Tagged No Tag Tagged No Tag Tagged No Tag In 

DATE Estimated Estimated Estimated Estimated Estimated Estimated Estimated Estimated Estimated Estimated Estimated Estimated Estimated Estimated Estimated Estimated

Loss Loss Loss Loss Loss Loss Loss Loss Loss Loss Loss Loss Loss Loss Loss Loss

1-Feb-08 0000 0 0 0 164 0000 0000 3,954 

2-Feb-08 0000 0 0 0 164 0000 0000 3,937 

3-Feb-08 0000 0 0 0 164 0000 0000 4,012 

4-Feb-08 0000 0 0 0 164 0000 0000 3,251 

5-Feb-08 0 44 0 3 0 47 0 211 0000 0000 3,508 

6-Feb-08 0 18 0 6 0 24 0 235 0000 0000 3,478 

7-Feb-08 0000 0 0 0 235 0000 0000 3,433 

8-Feb-08 0000 0 0 0 235 0000 0000 3,309 

9-Feb-08 0000 0 0 0 235 0000 0000 2,910 

10-Feb-08 0903 0 12 0 247 0000 0000 2,990 

11-Feb-08 0 73 0 3 0 76 0 323 0000 0000 3,485 

12-Feb-08 0006 0 6 0 329 0000 0000 3,561 

13-Feb-08 0003 0 3 0 332 0000 0000 3,647 

14-Feb-08 0006 0 6 0 338 0000 0000 3,616 

15-Feb-08 0 18 0 5 0 23 0 361 0000 0000 3,439 

16-Feb-08 0000 0 0 0 361 0000 0000 4,011 

17-Feb-08 0003 0 3 0 364 0000 0000 4,019 

18-Feb-08 0 0 0 10 0 10 0 374 0000 0000 3,429 

19-Feb-08 0 9 0 13 0 22 0 396 0000 0000 3,446 

20-Feb-08 0906 0 15 0 411 0030 3030 3,474 

21-Feb-08 0003 0 3 0 414 0000 0030 3,607 

22-Feb-08 0 27 0 9 0 36 0 450 0000 0030 3,580 

23-Feb-08 0 18 0 6 0 24 0 474 9000 9 0 12 0 3,497 24-Feb-08 18 0 0 3 18 3 18 477 0000 0 0 12 0 3,760 25-Feb-08 0 27 0 6 0 33 18 510 0000 0 0 12 0 3,431 26-Feb-08 0 18 0 6 0 24 18 534 0030 3 0 15 0 2,949 

27-Feb-08 0 18 0 10 0 28 18 562 0000 0 0 15 0 2,529 28-Feb-08 0 0 0 17 0 17 18 579 0000 0 0 15 0 2,731 29-Feb-08 0 44 0 7 0 51 18 630 0000 0 0 1,951 

Total 18 332 0 134 18 466 18 579 9 0 6 0 15 0 15 0 98,944 

Winter Run Incidental Take Levels (Oct 1 thru May 31) Spring Run Incidental Take Levels for Season Combined Total (Oct 1 thru Jun 30)Tagged Yellow Light Level = ??? SeasonTagged Red Light Level = ??? SeasonNo Tag Yellow Light Level = ??? SeasonNo Tag Red Light Level = ??? Season* This number is determined by Winter Run Length only until the tags have been read. All tags from Winter Run Length Fish have been read and numbers are updated thru 2/28/05.

Banks T
### SUBCHAPTER VII—GENERAL AUTHORITY
Electrical Conductivity, UMHOS

Day High Low Mean

1 747 150 354

2 830 177 394

3 892 128 362

4 847 141 391

5 931 152 440

6 1,027 173 480

7 1,037 172 476

8 955 193 448

9 998 200 469

10 996 176 461

11 672 145 355

12 668 149 346

13 799 146 363

14 845 153 379

15 814 159 383

16 921 180 412

17 1,196 190 506

18 1,026 174 519

19 1,151 167 481

20 1,030 197 505

21 955 197 464

22 934 207 436

23 791 163 403

24 793 172 406

25 858 212 442

26 887 205 456

27 897 162 429

28 931 152 393

29 893 149 402

30 1,267 158 496

COMMENT(S):

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

Historical Archive and Report Database

San Andreas On The San Joaquin River 

Period: September 2022 Run Date: 11/22/2022
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff—Appellant, v. Matthew T. MORLEDGE, Defendant—Appellee.

Nos. 05-30545, 05-30546.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted June 7, 2006.*

Decided July 20, 2006.

Eric B. Wolff, Office of the U.S. Attorney, Billings, MT, for Plaintiff-Appellant.

Mark S. Werner, Esq., Federal Defenders of Montana, Billings, MT, for Defendant-Appellee.

Before: BEEZER, TALLMAN, and BYBEE, Circuit Judges.

*

 This panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. *See*Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

MEMORANDUM **

The facts are known to the parties.

The government alleges that the district court impermissibly ignored relevant conduct when it did not consider Morledge’s alleged confession on September 27, 2002 in computing his sentence under the United States Sentencing Guidelines. We agree. We have held that, notwithstanding the Supreme Court’s decision in *United States v. Booker,*543 U.S. 220, 125 S.Ct. 738, 160 L.Ed.2d 621 (2005), 18 U.S.C. § 3553(a) requires “district courts to take the applicable Guidelines range into consideration when sentencing” and “a material error by the district court in calculating the applicable Guidelines range is grounds for resentencing.” *United States v. Cantrell,*433 F.3d 1269, 1279-80 (9th Cir.2006). The district court did not consider the government’s evidence that Morledge confessed to relevant conduct involving substantial drug dealing in his September 27, 2002 interview, nor did the court adjust the Guidelines sentence on the basis of the information allegedly disclosed during Morledge’s confession. Rather, the district court ignored the evidence because it concluded that Morledge should not be held accountable for the substance of the alleged confession. United States Sentencing Guideline § lB1.3(a) requires a sentencing court to consider relevant conduct in the sentencing of a defendant. Regardless of whether the district court would be otherwise justified in discounting Morledge’s confession un*555der *Booker*to give a lower sentence, the district court must first accurately compute the sentence under the Guidelines. It must then articulate reasons for departure (if does decide to depart) in order to allow for informed appellate review should the sentence imposed be thereafter challenged. Because the district court did not follow the Guidelines by first computing Morledge’s sentencing range, we vacate the judgement imposing the sentence and remand for resentencing consistent with this decision. We vacate and remand for further sentencing consistent with this opinion.

VACATED and REMANDED.

**

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
No. 11,916.

#### Van Schooten *v.*The People.

Decided September 19, 1927.

Plaintiff in error -was convicted of having in his possession a still for the manufacture of intoxicating liquor.

*Affirmed.*

*On Application for Supersedeas.*

1. Criminal *Law*— Instructions. Insufficiency of the court’s oral instructions cannot be assigned as error on review where there was no exception on that ground.

2. *Verdict*— Form. In a criminal prosecution for unlawful possession of a still, a verdict, which omitted the words, “used, designed and intended for the manufacture of intoxicating liquors,” and substituted the words, “in manner and form, as charged in the information,” not disturbed on review, where there was no objection or exception thereto.

*Error to the District Court of Kiowa County, Hon. Samuel D. Trimble, Judge.*

*350Mr. James C. Lang, Mr. John H. Vooehees, for plaintiff in error.

Mr. William L. Boatright, Attorney General, Mr. William W. Gaunt, Assistant, for the people.

*Department One.*

Me. Justice Denison

delivered the opinion of the court.

The plaintiff in error was convicted upon the charge of owning, operating and having in possession a still, used, designed and intended for the manufacture of intoxicating liquors. He brings error and moves for supersedeas. No instructions were requested. The court instructed the jury orally without objection or exception. It' is now claimed- that the instructions were not sufficient as to the issues of the case, and that no exception was necessary under *White v. People,*79 Colo. 261, 268, 245 Pac. 349. That case does not so hold, therefore, since there was no exception to the sufficiency of the court’s statement of the issues, the insufficiency thereof, if any, cannot be assigned as error. Rule 7.

The verdict, which was in form as instructed by the court, omitted the words, “used, designed and intended for the manufacture of intoxicating liquors,” and substituted the words, “in manner and form as charged in the information,”, but there was no objection or exception to the verdict or its form.

Supersedeas denied and judgment affirmed.

Me. Chief Justice Burke, Mr. Justice Whitford and Mr. Justice Sheafor concur.
(No. 6718

#### Atlantic Richfield Company, Claimant, *vs.*State of Illinois, Secretary of State, Respondent.

*Opinion filed February 1, 1973.*

Atlantic Richfield Company, Claimant, pro se.

William J. Scott, Attorney General; Saul R. Wexler, Assistant Attorney General, for Respondent.

Per Curiam.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

DAY HIGH

 296

 288

 302

 286

 308

 343

 325

 307

 309

 284

 271

 273

 297

 318

 329

 312

 327

 327

 312

 312

 333

 321

 315

 287

 270

 262

 237

 264

 275

 301

 251

 248

 237

 245

 237

 231

 234

 244

 245

 235

 241

 240

 240

 247

 234

 209

 212

 203

 216

 218

 230

 247

 210

 212

 231

 216

 208

 199

 199

 185

 265

 260

 260

 259

 261

 272

 273

 265

 262

 256

 254

 250

 261

 273

 273

 261

 256

 259

 255

 255

 267

 275

 267

 254

 246

 234

 221

 218

 222

 229

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

APRIL 2010 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: May 6, 2010

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

RIO VISTA ON THE SACRAMENTO RIVER
Exhibit
32.1
 
 Multiband
Corporation
 
 Certification
Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350
 As
Adopted Pursuant to
 Section
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
 
 In connection with this Quarterly
Report Form 10-Q, Multiband Corporation (the Company) for the period ended March
31, 2010, I, James L. Mandel, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, hereby
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:
 
 1.
              This
      Periodic Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
      15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d));
      and
 2.
              The
      information contained in the Periodic Report fairly presents, in all
      material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
      the Company.
 
 
 Date
      May 13, 2010
                        By:
                        /s/
      James L. MandelChief
      Executive Officer
### §399b. Office of Women's Health

#### (a) Establishment

There is established within the Office of the Commissioner, an office to be known as the Office of Women's Health (referred to in this section as the "Office"). The Office shall be headed by a director who shall be appointed by the Commissioner of Food and Drugs.

#### (b) Purpose

The Director of the Office shall—

(1) report to the Commissioner of Food and Drugs on current Food and Drug Administration (referred to in this section as the "Administration") levels of activity regarding women's participation in clinical trials and the analysis of data by sex in the testing of drugs, medical devices, and biological products across, where appropriate, age, biological, and sociocultural contexts;

(2) establish short-range and long-range goals and objectives within the Administration for issues of particular concern to women's health within the jurisdiction of the Administration, including, where relevant and appropriate, adequate inclusion of women and analysis of data by sex in Administration protocols and policies;

(3) provide information to women and health care providers on those areas in which differences between men and women exist;

(4) consult with pharmaceutical, biologics, and device manufacturers, health professionals with expertise in women's issues, consumer organizations, and women's health professionals on Administration policy with regard to women;

(5) make annual estimates of funds needed to monitor clinical trials and analysis of data by sex in accordance with needs that are identified; and

(6) serve as a member of the Department of Health and Human Services Coordinating Committee on Women's Health (established under section 237a(b)(4) of title 42).

#### (c) Authorization of appropriations

For the purpose of carrying out this section, there are authorized to be appropriated such sums as may be necessary for each of the fiscal years 2010 through 2014.

(June 25, 1938, ch. 675, §1011, as added Pub. L. 111–148, title III, §3509(g), Mar. 23, 2010, 124 Stat. 536.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Another section 1011 of act June 25, 1938, ch. 675, was enacted by Pub. L. 111–353, title II, §209(a), Jan. 4, 2011, 124 Stat. 3945, and subsequently renumbered section 1012 by Pub. L. 114–255, div. A, title III, §3073(b)(2), Dec. 13, 2016, 130 Stat. 1137, and is classified to section 399c of this title.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY HIGH

 353

 300

 281

 282

 316

 282

 275

 919

 854

 762

 1,027

 671

 1,136

 1,118

 1,277

 1,179

 1,394

 990

 679

 472

 447

 563

 614

 1,008

 975

 1,686

 1,628

 1,665

 1,440

 1,200

 892

 276

 269

 272

 266

 267

 264

 261

 283

 276

 282

 282

 277

 279

 288

 283

 280

 285

 286

 276

 269

 266

 249

 244

 232

 255

 240

 240

 266

 238

 263

 277

 287

 279

 275

 273

 277

 273

 268

 371

 371

 358

 375

 373

 429

 480

 471

 491

 542

 477

 413

 359

 332

 327

 332

 381

 391

 498

 542

 575

 500

 484

 479

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

MAY 2010 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: June 16, 2010

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

PITTSBURG TOP ON THE SACRAMENTO RIVER
#### § 418.2320 What is the effect of an initial determination?

We will follow the rules in § 418.1320, except that any references in that section to regulations in subpart B of this part shall be treated as references to the corresponding regulation in this subpart.
### Part X—Cyberspace, Digital Connectivity, and Related Technologies (CDT) Fund
#### William E. HOWELL, Petitioner, v. Herbert H. HANN, Warden, Nebraska State Penitentiary.

No. 15163.

United States Court of Appeals Eighth Circuit.

Aug. 27, 1954.

William E. Howell, pro se.

PER CURIAM.

Motion of petitioner for certificate of probable cause and for appeal, denied.
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ENACTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of United Bancorp, Inc. (the "Company")
on Form 10-Q for the period ending March 31, 2006 as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, James W. Everson,
Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as enacted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
          of the Company.


/s/ James W. Everson
-------------------------------------
James W. Everson,
Chairman, President and Chief
Executive Officer

May 12, 2006
[if !vml]>[endif]>

[if !vml]>[endif]>

You have reached the FederalDepository Library Program Electronic Collection (FDLP/EC) Archive. Thisarchive assures ongoing access to publications in the FDLP/EC. Access topublications in the archive is available through GPO's suite of cataloging andlocator services, including the Catalog of U.S. Government Publications(CGP).  Archived copies of publications are retrieved in the event thatpublications are no longer available from the original publishing agency site. 
**Title:****Social Values for EcosystemServices, version 3.0 (SoIVES 3.0) : documentation and user manual**
 
Document | SolVES_V3.zip
 
SuDoc Number:I 19.76:2015-1008
Item Number:0624-H (online)
CGP systemNumber:000942307
 
April 23, 2018
Exhibit 31.4

CERTIFICATIONS

I, Bruce E. Thomas, certify that:

1. I have
reviewed this Amendment No. 1 to Annual Report on Form 10-K/A for the year ended December 31, 2009 of Community Bankers Trust Corporation; and

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the
statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report.



/s/ Bruce E. ThomasBruce E. ThomasSenior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer


Date: April 30, 2010
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND

CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF
THE

SARBANES-OXLEY ACT

The certification set forth below is being submitted in connection with Warner Chilcott Limiteds Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2008, as amended by Amendment No. 1 on Form 10-K/A (the
Amended Annual Report) for the purpose of complying with Rule 13a-14(b) or Rule 15d-14(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the Exchange Act) and Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the United States
Code.

Roger M. Boissonneault, the Chief Executive Officer, and Paul Herendeen, the Chief Financial Officer, of Warner Chilcott Limited
each certifies that, to the best of his knowledge:



| | 1. | the Amended Annual Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Exchange Act; and
| | -- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | the information contained in the Amended Annual Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Warner Chilcott Limited.
| | -- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Date: April 17, 2009



/s/ Roger M. BoissonneaultName: Roger M. Boissonneault Title: President and Chief
Executive Officer


/s/ Paul HerendeenName: Paul Herendeen Title: Executive Vice President and
Chief Financial Officer
I 

114TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 420 

To establish a certification process for opting out of the individual health 

insurance mandate. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JANUARY 20, 2015 

Mr. SCHWEIKERT introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Ways and Means 

A BILL 

To establish a certification process for opting out of the 

individual health insurance mandate. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Obamacare Opt-Out 

5 Act of 2015’’. 

6 SEC. 2. HEALTH INSURANCE MANDATE OPT-OUT. 

7 (a) OBTAINING EXEMPTION.—Notwithstanding any 

8 other provision of law, an applicable individual (as defined 

9 in subsection (d) of section 5000A of the Internal Revenue 

10 Code of 1986) desiring an exemption from the requireVerDate Sep 11 2014 17:07 Jan 24, 2015 Jkt 049200 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 6652 Sfmt 6201 E:\BILLS\H420.IH H420

tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 420 IH

1 ment to maintain minimum essential coverage under sec2 tion 5000A(a) of such Code may— 

3 (1) request a certification from the Secretary of 

4 the Treasury, through the State Exchange or Fed5 eral Exchange, as applicable, that such individual is 

6 exempt from the requirements of section 5000A(a) 

7 of such Code, which such secretary shall grant upon 

8 request; or 

9 (2) indicate on the Federal income tax return 

10 of such individual that such individual elects an ex11 emption from the requirements of section 5000A(a) 

12 of such Code. 

13 (b) EXEMPTION FROM PENALTY.— 

14 (1) IN GENERAL.—Subsection (e) of section 

15 5000A of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 is 

16 amended by adding at the end the following: 

17 ‘‘(6) CERTIFICATION OF EXEMPTION; EXEMP18 TION CLAIMS.— 

19 ‘‘(A) CERTIFICATION OF EXEMPTION.—An 

20 applicable individual for any month during the 

21 taxable year in which such individual receives a 

22 certification of exemption under section 2(a)(1) 

23 of the Obamacare Opt-Out Act of 2015, and for 

24 any month during any subsequent taxable year. 


tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
3 

•HR 420 IH

1 ‘‘(B) EXEMPTION CLAIM.—An applicable 

2 individual, for any month in a taxable year for 

3 which an election for an exemption under sec4 tion 2(a)(2) of the Obamacare Opt-Out Act of 

5 2015 is made.’’. 

6 (2) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendments made 

7 by this subsection shall apply to months beginning 

8 after December 31, 2014. 

Æ 


tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
Editorial Note on Part 416
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 416 appear at 68 FR 53509, Sept. 11, 2003.

§ 416.575 When will we begin cross-program recovery from your current monthly benefits? ( a ) We will begin collecting the overpayment balance by cross-program recovery from your current monthly title II and title VIII benefits no sooner than 30 calendar days after the date of the notice described in § 416.574. If within that 30-day period you pay us the full overpayment balance stated in the notice, we will not begin cross-program recovery.
( b ) If within that 30-day period you ask us to review our determination that you still owe us this overpayment balance, we will not begin cross-program recovery from your current monthly benefits before we review the matter and notify you of our decision in writing.
( c ) If within that 30-day period you ask us to withhold a different amount from your current monthly benefits than the amount stated in the notice, we will not begin cross-program recovery until we determine the amount we will withhold. This paragraph does not apply when § 416.573(d) applies.
( d ) If within that 30-day period you ask us to waive recovery of the overpayment balance, we will not begin cross-program recovery from your current monthly benefits before we review the matter and notify you of our decision in writing. See §§ 416.550 through 416.556.
[70 FR 16, Jan. 3, 2005]
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY HIGH

 227

 238

 233

 240

 241

 235

 233

 233

 234

 229

 226

 219

 217

 216

 214

 210

 209

 200

 185

 188

 180

 159

 150

 144

 153

 150

 139

 147

 150

 150

 153

 143

 147

 161

 176

 169

 161

 182

 172

 169

 160

 150

 145

 147

 151

 165

 167

 148

 132

 93

 124

 110

 106

 105

 74

 84

 83

 97

 99

 101

 101

 97

 195

 206

 207

 220

 221

 212

 217

 211

 210

 208

 203

 196

 196

 200

 198

 197

 190

 178

 158

 165

 150

 137

 132

 123

 117

 120

 119

 125

 129

 127

 130

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

MAY 2008 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: June 3, 2008

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

SAN ANDREAS ON THE SAN JOAQUIN RIVER