alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE

SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF
2002

The undersigned hereby certifies that the annual report on Form 10-KSB of Oakmont Acquisition Corporation (the Registrant) for the
year ended December 31, 2006, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act
of 1934, as amended, and that the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Registrant.

Dated: June 14, 2007



| |  |                                                   |  |  |  | 
| |  | ------------------------------------------------- |  |  |  | 
| |  | /s/ Robert J. Skandalaris                         |  |  |  | 
| |  | Robert J. Skandalaris                             |  |  |  | 
| |  | Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer |  |  |  |
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY HIGH

 199

 287

 314

 289

 270

 295

 339

 400

 355

 308

 282

 275

 249

 242

 268

 287

 327

 300

 289

 326

 335

 292

 228

 239

 241

 232

 224

 232

 222

 217

 226

 187

 186

 191

 191

 192

 180

 188

 202

 211

 211

 201

 207

 196

 209

 209

 205

 204

 207

 208

 206

 201

 200

 182

 198

 188

 167

 168

 173

 177

 186

 194

 193

 203

 210

 208

 210

 222

 228

 254

 239

 234

 225

 222

 215

 215

 217

 214

 225

 227

 228

 231

 230

 215

 206

 216

 212

 199

 192

 193

 196

 199

 207

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

JANUARY 2012 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: February 16, 2012

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

RIO VISTA ON THE SACRAMENTO RIVER
|                |  |  |  |  |  |                                                                   
|--------------- |  |  |  |  |  | ------------------------------------------------------------------
|[Deloitte Logo] |  |  |  |  |  | Hadjipavlou Sofianos & Cambanis
S.A.                              
|                |  |  | 
|                |  |  |  |  |  | Assurance & Advisory Services                                     
|                |  |  | 
|                |  |  |  |  |  | 250 - 254 Kifissias Ave. GR - 152 31
Halandri Athens, Greece      
|                |  |  | 
|                |  |  |  |  |  | Tel.: +30 (210) 6781.100 Fax: +30 (210)
6776.221-2 www.deloitte.gr

CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

We consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration Statement No. 333-135109 on Form S-3 of our reports dated March 2, 2007, relating to the consolidated
financial statements of Quintana Maritime Limited and managements report on the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting, appearing in this Annual Report on Form 10-K of Quintana Maritime Limited for the year ended December
31, 2006.

/s/ Deloitte

Deloitte.,

Hadjipavlou, Sofianos & Cambanis S.A.

Athens, Greece

March 8, 2007



















|                                                                                                               |  |  |  |  |  |                                    |  | 
|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- |  |  |  |  |  | ---------------------------------- |  | 
|Hadjipavlou Sofianos & Cambanis S.A. Assurance & Advisory Services Co. Reg. No. 28953/01AT/B93/2052            |  |  |  |  |  | Member of Deloitte Touche
Tohmatsu
|                                                                                                               |  |  | 
|Thessaloniki: 1, Adrianoupoleos Str., GR - 551 33 Kalamaria, Tel.: +30 (2310) 406.500, Fax: +30 (2310) 416.447 |  |  |  |  |  |
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
 WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549
 FORM 8-K
 CURRENT REPORT
Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
 Date of Report (Date of Earliest Event Reported): June 30, 2011
 Apollo Group, Inc.
 
 Arizona
    
    0-25232
    
    86-0419443(State or other jurisdiction 
of incorporation)
    
    (Commission
File Number)
    
    (I.R.S. Employer
Identification No.)
 4025 S. Riverpoint Parkway, Phoenix, 
Arizona
    
    85040(Address of principal executive offices)
    
    (Zip Code)
  
   o
    
    Written communications pursuant to Rule 425 under the Securities Act (17 CFR 230.425)
 o
    
    Soliciting material pursuant to Rule 14a-12 under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.14a-12)
 o
    
    Pre-commencement communications pursuant to Rule 14d-2(b) under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.14d-2(b))
 o
    
    Pre-commencement communications pursuant to Rule 13e-4(c) under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.13e-4(c))




---



##### 



Section 2  Financial Information
 Item 2.02
    
    Results of Operations and Financial Condition.
   Section 5  Corporate Governance and Management
 Item 5.02
    
    Departure of Directors or Certain Officers; Election of Directors; Appointment of Certain
Officers; Compensatory Arrangements of Certain Officers
   cum laude
  Section 9  Financial Statements and Exhibits
 Item 9.01
    
    Financial Statements and Exhibits.
 (d)
    
    Exhibits.
  Exhibit Number
    
    Description99.1
    
    Text of press release of Apollo Group, Inc. dated June 30, 2011.




---



##### 



SIGNATURES
  Apollo Group, Inc.June 30, 2011
    By:
    /s/ Brian L. SwartzName:
    Brian L. SwartzTitle:
    Senior Vice President and Chief
Financial Officer




---



##### 



Exhibit No.
    
    Description99.1
    
    Text of press release of Apollo Group, Inc. dated June 30,
2011.
§ 408.510 How do we reduce your SVB when you receive other benefit income? ( a ) *Amount of the reduction.* If you receive other benefit income as defined in § 408.220, we will reduce your SVB payment by the amount of the other benefit income you receive in that month. The reduction is on a dollar-for-dollar and cents-for-cents basis. We do not round SVB payment amounts except as described in paragraph (b) of this section.
( b ) *Minimum benefit amount.* If the reduction described in paragraph (a) of this section results in a benefit amount that is greater than zero but less than $1.00, we will pay you a benefit of $1.00 for that month.
[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 76 (Wednesday, April 20, 2011)]
[Notices]
[Page 22156]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2011-9553]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

NATIONAL CREDIT UNION ADMINISTRATION


Agency Information Collection Activities: Submission to OMB for 
Review; Comment Request

AGENCY: National Credit Union Administration (NCUA).

ACTION: Request for comment.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The NCUA intends to submit the following information 
collection to the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) for review and 
clearance under the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (Pub. L. 104-13, 44 
U.S.C. Chapter 35). This information collection is published to obtain 
comments from the public.

DATES: Comments will be accepted until May 20, 2011.

ADDRESSES: Interested parties are invited to submit written comments to 
NCUA Clearance Officer listed below:
    Clearance Officer: Tracy Sumpter, National Credit Union 
Administration, 1775 Duke Street, Alexandria, Virginia 22314-3428, Fax 
No. 703-837-2861, E-mail: <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#4708040e082a262e2b072924322669202831"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="fab5b9b3b5979b9396ba94998f9bd49d958c">[email protected]</span></a>.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:  Requests for additional information 
or a copy of the information collection request should be directed to 
Tracy Sumpter at the National Credit Union Administration, 1775 Duke 
Street, Alexandria, VA 22314-3428, or at (703) 518-6440.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Proposal for the following collection of 
information:
    OMB Number: 3133-0121.
    Form Number: 4063 and 4063a.
    Type of Review: Reinstatement, without change, of a previously 
approved collection.
    Title: Notice of Change of Official or Senior Executive Officer and 
Individual Application for Approval of Official or Senior Executive 
Officer.
    Description: In order to comply with statutory requirements, the 
agency must obtain sufficient information from new officials or senior 
executive officers of troubled or newly chartered credit unions to 
determine their fitness for the position. These forms standardize the 
information gathered to evaluate the individual's fitness for the 
position. The format is similar to the one used by the FFIEC agencies 
and the FRB. 12 CFR 701.14 and 741.205.
    Estimated No. of Respondents/Recordkeepers: 650.
    Estimated Burden Hours per Response: 2.0 hours.
    Frequency of Response: Reporting and on occasion.
    Estimated Total Annual Burden Hours: 1,300.
    Estimated Total Annual Cost: $0.

    By the National Credit Union Administration Board on April 14, 
2011.
Mary Rupp,
Secretary of the Board.
[FR Doc. 2011-9553 Filed 4-19-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7535-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
<PAGE>

                THE TRAVELERS INSURANCE COMPANY AND SUBSIDIARIES

                                                                   Exhibit 32.01

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of The Travelers Insurance
Company (the "Company") for the quarter ended March 31, 2004, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), George C.
Kokulis, as Chief Executive Officer of the Company, and Glenn D. Lammey, as
Chief Financial Officer of the Company, each hereby certifies, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that:

(1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d)
     of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
     respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



/s/ George C. Kokulis
______________________________

George C. Kokulis
Chief Executive Officer
May 13, 2004



/s/ Glenn D. Lammey
______________________________

Glenn D. Lammey
Chief Financial Officer
May 13, 2004

This certification accompanies each Report pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of
Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
## F IRST 

## D ISTRICT 

## C OURT OF 

## A PPEAL 

## S TATE OF 

## F LORIDA

_____________________________
No. 1D 19

- 733

_____________________________
W ILLIAM B ROWN , Appellant,

v.

S TATE OF F LORIDA ,
Appellee.

_____________________________

On appeal from the Circuit Court for Duval County

. Tatiana Salvador , Judge

. September 9, 2019

P ER C URIAM

. This is an appeal from an order dismissing Appellant’s second motion for postconviction relief on the ground that the trial court lacked jurisdiction to entertain the motion during the pendency of Appellant’s appeal from the denial of his first motion for postconviction relief . The State properly concedes that the trial court had jurisdiction to ru le on Appellant’s second postconviction motion where the issue raised in that motion was unrelated to the issues raised in his prior postconviction motion. See Rhow v. State

, 264 So. 3d 288 (Fla. 1st DCA 2019). Accordingly, we reverse and remand for furthe r proceedings.

R EVERSED and R EMANDED

.
W OLF , R OBERTS , and J AY , JJ., concur

.2 _____________________________ Not final until disposition of any timely and authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 9.331

.

_____________________________

William Brown, pro se

, Appellant.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, and Anne C. Conley, Assistant Attorney General

, Tallahassee, for Appellee.
§ 404.2110 What we mean by “SGA” and by “a continuous period of 9 months”. ( a ) *What we mean by “SGA”.* In determining whether an individual's work is SGA, we will follow the rules in §§ 404.1572 through 404.1575. We will follow these same rules for individuals who are statutorily blind, but we will evaluate the earnings in accordance with the rules in § 404.1584(d).
( b ) *What we mean by “a continuous period of 9 months”.* A continuous period of 9 months ordinarily means a period of 9 consecutive calendar months. Exception: When an individual does not perform SGA in 9 consecutive calendar months, he or she will be considered to have done so if— ( 1 ) The individual performs 9 months of SGA within 10 consecutive months and has monthly earnings that meet or exceed the guidelines in § 404.1574(b)(2), or § 404.1584(d) if the individual is statutorily blind; or
( 2 ) The individual performs at least 9 months of SGA within 12 consecutive months, and the reason for not performing SGA in 2 or 3 of those months was due to circumstances beyond his or her control and unrelated to the impairment (e.g., the employer closed down for 3 months).
( c ) *What work we consider.* In determining if a continuous period of SGA has been completed, all of an individual's work activity may be evaluated for purposes of this section, including work performed before October 1981, during the waiting period, during the trial work period and after entitlement to disability benefits terminated. We will ordinarily consider only the first 9 months of SGA that occur. The exception will be if an individual who completed 9 months of SGA later stops performing SGA, receives VR services and then performs SGA for a 9-month period. See § 404.2115 for the use of the continuous period in determining payment for VR services.
[48 FR 6293, Feb. 10, 1983, as amended at 55 FR 8454, Mar. 8, 1990]
* Pursuant to Local Rule 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in Local Rule 47.5.4. IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 96-10254 Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus HUGO ROMAN ALMENDAREZ-TORRES, Defendant-Appellant.

- - - - - - - - - - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas USDC No. 4:95-CR-124-A

- - - - - - - - - - August 22, 1996 Before KING, DUHÉ, and DeMOSS, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: * Hugo Roman Almendarez-Torres appeals his judgment of conviction and sentence after pleading guilty to reentry after deportation in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326. He argues that he was charged with and pleaded guilty to § 1326(a), simple reentry, but that he was sentenced as if he had pleaded guilty to reentry following a conviction for an aggravated felony for purposes of § 1326(b)(2). His argument is foreclosed by this court's opinionNo. 96-10254 - 2 - in United States v. Vasquez-Olvera , 999 F.2d 943 (5th Cir. 1993), cert. denied , 510 U.S. 1076 (1994).
AFFIRMED.
Electrical Conductivity, UMHOS

Day High Low Mean

1 0 0 0

2 0 0 0

3 0 0 0

4 0 0 0

5 0 0 0

6 0 0 0

7 0 0 0

8 0 0 0

9 0 0 0

10 0 0 0

11 0 0 0

12 0 0 0

13 0 0 0

14 0 0 0

15 0 0 0

16 0 0 0

17 0 0 0

18 0 0 0

19 0 0 0

20 0 0 0

21 0 0 0

22 0 0 0

23 0 0 0

24 0 0 0

25 0 0 0

26 0 0 0

27 0 0 0

28 0 0 0

29 0 0 0

30 0 0 0

31 0 0 0

COMMENT(S):

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

Historical Archive and Report Database

Pittsburg TopOn The Sacramento River

Period: December 2023 Run Date: 1/16/2024
_________________________________________ 

 

 

Order Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan 

July 30, 2007 Clifford W. Taylor,

 Chief Justice 

133692 Michael F. Cavanagh 

Elizabeth A. Weaver 

Marilyn Kelly 

Maura D. Corrigan 

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, 

Plaintiff-Appellee, 

Robert P. Young, Jr. 

Stephen J. Markman,

 Justices 

v SC: 133692 

 COA: 266367 

Kent CC: 04-005811-FH 

KEVIN SHAUNTA JOHNSON,

Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/ 

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the February 22, 2007 

judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not 

persuaded that the question presented should be reviewed by this Court. 

p0723 

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

July 30, 2007 

 Clerk
Exhibit 31.2
 § 302 CERTIFICATION
             Date: July 15, 2011
    /s/ JOHN A. ELWOODJohn A. ElwoodSenior Vice President  Finance and Administration,
Chief Financial Officer (Principal Financial Officer)
### §276k. Auditing of accounts

The certificate of the Chairman of the House delegation or the Senate delegation of the Mexico-United States Interparliamentary group shall on and after April 9, 1960 be final and conclusive upon the accounting officers in the auditing of the accounts of the United States group of the Mexico-United States Interparliamentary group.

(Pub. L. 86–420, §4, Apr. 9, 1960, 74 Stat. 40.)
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THE SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE CONDENSED
CONSOLIDATED  BALANCE SHEET AT SEPTEMBER 30, 1999  (Unaudited) AND THE CONDENSED
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF INCOME FOR THE THREE MONTHS
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JUL-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1999
<CASH>                                       1,722,550
<SECURITIES>                                    12,866
<RECEIVABLES>                                1,845,816
<ALLOWANCES>                                   402,433
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             3,688,132
<PP&E>                                       2,632,457
<DEPRECIATION>                                 966,320
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               6,671,390
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        1,241,883
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        90,191
<OTHER-SE>                                   5,339,316
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 6,671,390
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             1,676,064
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             1,070,318
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                52,840
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 774
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                583,929
<INCOME-TAX>                                   216,597
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            367,332
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   367,332
<EPS-BASIC>                                        .04
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .04


</TABLE>
§ 30.416 How and when should medical reports be submitted? ( a ) The initial medical report (and any subsequent reports) should be made in narrative form on the physician's letterhead stationery. The physician should use the Form EE-7 as a guide for the preparation of his or her initial medical report in support of a claim under Part B and/or Part E of EEOICPA. The report should bear the physician's handwritten or electronic signature. OWCP may require an original signature on the report.
( b ) The report shall be submitted directly to OWCP as soon as possible after medical examination or treatment is received, either by the employee or the physician.
[71 FR 78534, Dec. 29, 2006, as amended at 84 FR 3052, Feb. 8, 2019]
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1998
<CASH>                                          11,829
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    4,810
<ALLOWANCES>                                       891
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                         358,349
<DEPRECIATION>                                  57,955
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 332,774
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0
<BONDS>                                        242,030
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            39
<OTHER-SE>                                      84,554
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   332,774
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                16,054
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    8,409
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 2,523
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               5,335
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (1,206)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (1,206)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (1,206)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.31)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.31)
        

</TABLE>
#### § 411.630 Is SSA's decision final?

Yes. Our decision is final. If either the beneficiary or the EN that is not a State VR agency is unwilling to accept our decision, either has the right to terminate its relationship with the other.