alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 18-6663

ROBERT GARY MOORE,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

v.

BISHOP, Warden; JOHN DOE, Commissioner (DOC); SIERRA NOLAN, LPN; 

KRISTA SELF, CFNP; WEXFORD HEALTH SOURCES, INC.; RYAN 

BROWNING, Nurse,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. 

James K. Bredar, Chief District Judge. (1:17-cv-01919-JKB)

Submitted: November 29, 2018 Decided: January 3, 2019

Before GREGORY, Chief Judge, DIAZ, Circuit Judge, and SHEDD, Senior Circuit 

Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Robert G. Moore, Appellant Pro Se. Lucas William Chrencik, GOODELL DEVRIES 

LEECH & DANN, LLP, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Robert Gary Moore appeals the district court’s order granting summary judgment 

to the Defendants and dismissing his civil rights complaint. We have reviewed the record 

and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district 

court. Moore v. Bishop, No. 1:17-cv-01919-JKB (D. Md. May 10, 2018). We deny as

moot Moore’s motion to compel. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and 

legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument 

would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
Exhibit 32.1
 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. §1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO §906
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
  (1)
    
    The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and(2)
    
    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Company as of the dates and for the
periods expressed in the Report.
 Date: March 14, 2011
    /s/ Jeff D. MorrisJeff D. MorrisChief Executive Officer/s/ Shai EvenShai EvenSenior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 77 (Thursday, April 21, 2011)]
[Notices]
[Page 22396]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2011-9713]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM


Formations of, Acquisitions by, and Mergers of Bank Holding 
Companies

    The companies listed in this notice have applied to the Board for 
approval, pursuant to the Bank Holding Company Act of 1956 (12 U.S.C. 
1841 et seq.) (BHC Act), Regulation Y (12 CFR part 225), and all other 
applicable statutes and regulations to become a bank holding company 
and/or to acquire the assets or the ownership of, control of, or the 
power to vote shares of a bank or bank holding company and all of the 
banks and nonbanking companies owned by the bank holding company, 
including the companies listed below.
    The applications listed below, as well as other related filings 
required by the Board, are available for immediate inspection at the 
Federal Reserve Bank indicated. The application also will be available 
for inspection at the offices of the Board of Governors. Interested 
persons may express their views in writing on the standards enumerated 
in the BHC Act (12 U.S.C. 1842(c)). If the proposal also involves the 
acquisition of a nonbanking company, the review also includes whether 
the acquisition of the nonbanking company complies with the standards 
in section 4 of the BHC Act (12 U.S.C. 1843). Unless otherwise noted, 
nonbanking activities will be conducted throughout the United States.
    Unless otherwise noted, comments regarding each of these 
applications must be received at the Reserve Bank indicated or the 
offices of the Board of Governors not later than May 16, 2011.
    A. Federal Reserve Bank of Boston (Richard Walker, Community 
Affairs Officer) P.O. Box 55882, Boston, Massachusetts 02106-2204:
    1. Mechanics Bancorp, MHC and Mechanics Bancorp, Inc., both of 
Taunton, Massachusetts; to become a mutual bank holding company and a 
stock bank holding company, respectively, by acquiring Mechanics Co-
operative Bank, Taunton, Massachusetts.

    Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, April 18, 
2011.

Robert deV. Frierson,
Deputy Secretary of the Board.
[FR Doc. 2011-9713 Filed 4-20-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6210-01-P
<PAGE>   1

                                                                 EXHIBIT 10.133


                                   AGREEMENT

        It is hereby agreed by and between MEGO FINANCIAL CORP. (the "Company")
and HERBERT B. HIRSCH (the "Employee") as follows:


                                    RECITALS

        WHEREAS, the Employee has been a senior officer of the Corporation
since January, 1988, presently holding the offices of Senior Vice President,
Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer; and

        WHEREAS, the Employee and the Company have agreed that it is
appropriate to enter into this contractual arrangement with respect to the
severance payment to be made by the Company to the Employee at such time as
the Employee is no longer employed by the Company; and

        WHEREAS, the Board of Directors of the Company has approved the terms
of this agreement on September 2, 1997;

        NOW THEREFORE, in consideration of the continuing services being
performed by the Employee and for other good and valuable consideration, it is
agreed as follows:

1.  The above recitals are true and correct.

2.  In the event the employment of the Employee in his present capacity with
the Company is terminated for any reason, including but not limited to the
Employee's death, disability, or retirement, the Company shall promptly pay to
the Employee (or his personal representative if the Employee is deceased) the
sum of ONE HUNDRED FIFTY THOUSAND DOLLARS ($150,000), in full satisfaction of
any severance obligations of the Company.

3.  The foregoing severance payment shall be in addition to, and in no way
credited against, any sums due to or payable on behalf of the Employee by or
from the Company for any other reason, including but not limited to (i) accrued
salary and vacation pay, (ii) reimbursement of expenses due Employee, (iii)
amounts due Employee under the agreement dated August 1, 1994 between the
Company and the Employee relating to the payment of 1% of In-



                                       1
<PAGE>   2

centive Income of the Company to the Employee through the end of fiscal 1999,
and (iv) second-to-die insurance premium amounts payable by the Company on
behalf of the Employee or a trust of the Employee under the Company's Split
Dollar Insurance Plan.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have executed this agreement as of this 2nd day
of September, 1997.


MEGO FINANCIAL CORP.


By /s/ JEROME J. COHEN
   -------------------------------
       Jerome J. Cohen, President


HERBERT B. HIRSCH


/s/ HERBERT B. HIRSCH
---------------------------------- 





hhsev









                                       2
Faulk, Scott (OST) 

From: 

Sent: 

To: 

Subject: 

Stan_Hao/MOLOKAIH/HIDOE@notes.kl2.hi.us 

Friday, November 22, 2013 9:05 PM 

EAS (OST) 

Kalaupapa EAS 

Aloha Department of Transportation, 

... ;.·- _; 

I am communicating to support Mokulele Airline's bid to provide service to Kalaupapa and beyond. As an 

educational institution, Molokai High School has found them to be the most dependable and reliable air service 

for Molokai. Mok:ulele is always the first choice for air service when making trips to Oahu and Maui for 

business. Our athletic teams as well as other students traveling for various events have always been delivered 

with professionalism and care. 

Personally, my wife and I also will schedule family visits to Kona and Oahu via Mokulele. There is also an ease of 

movement at all of their airports whether arriving or departing. We Mokulele to any of the other carriers 

because of its dependability and on time or earlier departures and arrivals. 

I have never had a problem with their pilots, ground staff or check in agents. Everyone is courteous, friendly and 

professional. 

Please select Mokulele to serve Kalaupapa. 

Mahalo and Have A Great MOLOKAl FARMER Day!!!!!!! 

Stanford Hao 

Principal 

Molokai High School 

1
#### Jose C. de Figuerola, Respondent, v. McGraw-Hill Publishing Company, Inc., Appellant.

Order unanimously affirmed, with $20 costs and disburse*876ments, with leave to the defendant to answer within ten days after service of the order, with notice of entry thereof, on payment of said costs. No opinion. Present — Dore, J. P., Cohn, Callahan, Yan Yoorhis and Shientag, JJ. [190 Mise. 799.] [See *post,*p. 957.]
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### Office of the Secretary

Notice is hereby given that I have delegated to the Commissioner of Food and Drugs the authorities vested in the Secretary of Health and Human Services under Section 3 of the Comprehensive Smokeless Tobacco Health Education Act of 1986 (15 U.S.C. 4402) (as amended by the Family Smoking Prevention and Tobacco Control Act), as amended. These authorities may be redelegated.

These authorities shall be exercised under the Department's policy on regulations and the existing delegation of authority to approve and issue regulations. In addition, I hereby ratify and affirm any actions taken by the Commissioner of Food and Drugs, or other FDA officials, which involved the exercise of the authorities delegated herein prior to the effective date of this delegation. This delegation is effective upon signature.

(Authority: Section 6 of the Reorganization Plan No. 1 of 1953, Section 2 of the Reorganization Plan No. 3 of 1966, and 5 U.S.C. 301.)

Dated: April 14, 2011.

Kathleen Sebelius,

Secretary of Health and Human Services.

[FR Doc. 2011-9667 Filed 4-20-11; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4160-01-P
Editorial Note on Part 416
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 416 appear at 68 FR 53509, Sept. 11, 2003.

§ 416.1044 How and when we determine whether the processing time standards are met. ( a ) *How we determine processing times.* For all initial title II cases, we calculate the mean number of days, including Saturdays, Sundays, and holidays, from the day the case folder is received in the State agency until the day it is released to us by the State agency. For initial title XVI cases, we calculate the mean number of days, including Saturdays, Sundays, and holidays, from the day the case folder is received in the State agency until the day there is systems input of a presumptive disability decision or the day the case folder is released to us by the State agency, whichever is earlier.
( b ) *Frequency of review.* Title II processing times and title XVI processing times are monitored separately on a quarterly basis. The determination as to whether or not the processing time thresholds have been met is made at the end of each quarter each year. Quarterly State-by-State mean processing times are compared with the threshold levels for both title II and title XVI.
[46 FR 29211, May 29, 1981, as amended at 56 FR 11023, Mar. 14, 1991]
§ 404.1019 Work as a member of a uniformed service of the United States. ( a ) Your work as a member of a uniformed service of the United States is covered under Social Security (unless creditable under the Railroad Retirement Act), if— ( 1 ) On or after January 1, 1957, the work is service on active duty or active duty for training but not including service performed while on leave without pay; or
( 2 ) On or after January 1, 1988, the work is service on inactive duty training.
( b ) You are a *member of a uniformed service* if— ( 1 ) You are appointed, enlisted, or inducted into (or a retired member of)— ( i ) One of the armed services (Army, Navy, Air Force, Marine Corps, or Coast Guard); or
( ii ) A component of one of the armed services, including any reserve component as defined in Veterans' Benefits, 38 U.S.C. 101 (except the Coast Guard Reserve as a temporary member);
( 2 ) You are a commissioned officer (including a retired commissioned officer) of the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration or the Regular or Reserve Corps of the Public Health Service;
( 3 ) You are a member of the Fleet Reserve or Fleet Marine Corps Reserve;
( 4 ) You are a cadet at the United States Military, Coast Guard, or Air Force Academy, or a midshipman at the United States Naval Academy;
( 5 ) You are a member of the Reserve Officers Training Corps, the Naval Reserve Officers Training Corps, or the Air Force Reserve Officers Training Corps, when ordered to annual training duty for 14 days or more including periods of authorized travel to and from that duty; or
( 6 ) You are selected for active military or naval training under the Military Selective Service Act or are provisionally accepted for active duty in the military or naval service and you are ordered or directed to a place for final acceptance or entry upon active duty and are on the way to or from, or at, that place.
[45 FR 20075, Mar. 27, 1980, as amended at 57 FR 59913, Dec. 17, 1992]
Exhibit 32.1



CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER  PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES- OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Annual Report of  Enable IPC Corporation (the "Company") on Form 10-KSB for the period ended March 31, 2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),



I, David Walker, the undersigned Chief Executive Officer of the Company, hereby certify, based on my knowledge, solely for the purpose of complying with  18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes- Oxley Act of 2002,  that:



(1)   The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2)   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all  material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.



IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has executed this Certification as of the 15th day of June 2007.



/s/ David Walker

------------------------

David Walker



Chief Executive Officer
----

| 1) |   | The                    Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a)                    or 15(d) of                    the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;                    and |
|----|--------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| 2) |   | The                    information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material                    respects, the financial condition and results of operations of                    the                    Company. |
|----|--------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|                                                               |   |   |
|--------------------------------------------------------------------|--------|--------|
|  /s/ Michael J. Quillen                                       |   |
|                      Michael J. Quillen                       |   |   |
| President,                    Chief Executive Officer and Director |   |   |
| (Principal                    Executive Officer)                   |   |   |

----
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

MEMORANDUM OPINION

No. 04-12-00632-CV

Katherine ARREDONDO and DTND Sierra Investments, LLC,

Appellants

v.

Wade RINER,

Appellee

From the County Court at Law No. 10, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 376371

Honorable Irene Rios, Judge Presiding

PER CURIAM

Sitting: Catherine Stone, Chief Justice

Karen Angelini, Justice

Sandee Bryan Marion, Justice

Delivered and Filed: January 9, 2013

DISMISSED FOR WANT OF PROSECUTION

Appellants’ brief, which was due on November 19, 2012, has not been filed. On 

December 4, 2012, this court ordered appellants to show cause in writing by December 19, 2012,

why this appeal should not be dismissed for want of prosecution. Appellants did not respond. 

The appeal is dismissed for want of prosecution. See TEX. R. APP. P. 38.8(a)(1), 42.3(b). Costs 

of appeal are taxed against appellants.

PER CURIAM
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 98-6971

CALVIN SCOTT WEDINGTON,

Petitioner - Appellant,

versus

KATHLEEN HAWK,

Respondent - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Malcolm J. Howard, District

Judge. (CA-98-50-5-H)

Submitted: April 15, 1999 Decided: April 21, 1999

Before NIEMEYER and HAMILTON, Circuit Judges, and PHILLIPS, Senior

Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Calvin Scott Wedington, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Calvin Scott Wedington appeals the district court’s order

denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (1994) petition. We have

reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find no

reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the

district court. See Wedington v. Hawk, No. CA-98-50-5-H (E.D.N.C.

June 8, 1998). We dispense with oral argument because the facts

and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials

before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

EASTERN DISTRICT

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

Respondent

v.

MICHAEL BLACK,

Petitioner :

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

: No. 204 EAL 2017

Petition for Allowance of Appeal from

the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW , this 26th day of September, 2017

, the Petition for Allowance of

Appeal is DENIED

.
#### § 411.415 Who will verify the establishment of agreements between ENs and State VR agencies?

The PM will verify the establishment of these agreements. Each EN is required to submit a copy of the agreement it has established with the State VR agency to the PM.
(No. 4149

#### Shan Durkin, Claimant, *vs.*State of Illinois, Respondent.

*Opinion filed October 20, 1949.*

Shan Durkin, Claimant, pro se.

Ivan A. Elliott, Attorney General; C. Arthur Rebel, Assistant Attorney G-eneral, for Respondent.

IjANSDEN, J.

Claimant, Shan Durkin, seeks to recover under the provisions of the Workmen’s Compensation Act for the partial loss of use of her right arm and for medical expenses incurred and paid by her in the amount of $329.00 as a result of an accident arising out of and in course of *38her employment as secretary to the Director of the Department of Public Works and Buildings.

The accident occurred on July 23, 1947, in the suite of offices in the Capitol Building, Springfield, Illinois, of the Director and Assistant Director of the Department of Public Works and Buildings. Claimant was going from the inner office to the reception room and was struck by the swinging gate between such rooms which caused her to lose her footing and fall to the floor. As a result of the falling, claimant sustained a comminuted displaced fracture above the elbow of her right arm and the tearing of the fascia and ligaments in her right elbow.

Claimant paid all of the medical and hospital bills incurred in connection with her accident, and treatment, continued until December 8,1948.

The record also shows that within a week after her accident, claimant returned to work and was paid her full salary and was never paid any compensation.

Claimant filed her complaint on December 22, 1948, approximately eighteen months after the accident occurred.

This Court has repeatedly held that it has no jurisdiction to hear a claim under the Workmen’s Compensation Act where the claimant fail's to file her claim within the time set by Section 24 of said Act. *Stuenkel*v. *State,*16 C.R.R. 34; *Stallard*v. *State,*16 C.C.R. 78; *Benner*v. *State,*16 C.C.R. 104; *Britt*v. *State,*16 C.C.R. 114; *Rathje*v. *State,*16 C.C.R. 177; *Clifton*v. *State,*16 C.C.R 298; *Domianus*v. *State,*17 C.C.R. 197.

The Stuenkel case above cited is quite similar to the instant case on the facts and the law therein announced is controlling.

Hugo Antonacci, 502 Illinois National Bank Building, Springfield, Illinois, was employed to take and trans*39cribe the evidence before Commissioner Jenkins. Charges in the amount of $14.20 were incurred for such services, which amount is fair, reasonable and customary, and an award is therefore entered in favor of Hugo Antonacci for such amount. o

Claimant having failed to comply with the provisions of Section 24 of the Workmen’s Compensation Act, her claim must be and is hereby denied.

This award is subject to the approval of the Governor as provided in Section 3 of “An Act concerning the payment of compensation awards to State employees.”'