alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
CENTRAL VALLEY OPERATIONS OFFICE

CHINOOK SALMON REPORT

May 2008

Note:Bold numbers are not verified by DFG & DWR Preliminary Data - Subject to Change

Winter Run Chinook Salmon Estimated Loss (Incidental Take) Spring Run Chinook Salmon Estimated Loss (Incidental Take) 

Daily SWP Daily CVP Daily Combined Season Combined Daily SWP Daily CVP Daily Combined Season Combined Dail

Tagged* No Tag Tagged* No Tag Tagged* No Tag Tagged* No Tag Tagged No Tag Tagged No Tag Tagged No Tag Tagged No Tag In 

DATE Estimated Estimated Estimated Estimated Estimated Estimated Estimated Estimated Estimated Estimated Estimated Estimated Estimated Estimated Estimated Estimated

Loss Loss Loss Loss Loss Loss Loss Loss Loss Loss Loss Loss Loss Loss Loss Loss

1-May-08 0000 0 0 18 1,247 0 283 0 73 0 356 216 7,388 924 

2-May-08 0000 0 0 18 1,247 0 282 0 97 0 379 216 7,767 517 

3-May-08 0000 0 0 18 1,247 0 255 0 87 0 342 216 8,109 645 

4-May-08 0000 0 0 18 1,247 18 684 0 72 18 756 234 8,865 596 

5-May-08 0000 0 0 18 1,247 0 460 0 33 0 493 234 9,358 550 

6-May-08 0000 0 0 18 1,247 0 365 0 61 0 426 234 9,784 550 

7-May-08 0000 0 0 18 1,247 0 147 0 75 0 222 234 10,006 663 

8-May-08 0000 0 0 18 1,247 9 149 0 48 9 197 243 10,203 507 

9-May-08 0000 0 0 18 1,247 0 104 0 30 0 134 243 10,337 647 

10-May-08 0000 0 0 18 1,247 0 321 0 35 0 356 243 10,693 719 

11-May-08 0000 0 0 18 1,247 0 68 0 48 0 116 243 10,809 688 

12-May-08 0000 0 0 18 1,247 0 139 0 21 0 160 243 10,969 633 

13-May-08 0000 0 0 18 1,247 0 106 0 8 0 114 243 11,083 677 

14-May-08 0000 0 0 18 1,247 10 41 0 14 10 55 253 11,138 614 

15-May-08 0000 0 0 18 1,247 0 19 0 3 0 22 253 11,160 618 

16-May-08 0000 0 0 18 1,247 0 42 0 7 0 49 253 11,209 497 

17-May-08 0000 0 0 18 1,247 0 0 0 15 0 15 253 11,224 92 

18-May-08 0000 0 0 18 1,247 0 28 0 11 0 39 253 11,263 1,050 

19-May-08 0000 0 0 18 1,247 0000 0 0 253 11,263 801 

20-May-08 0000 0 0 18 1,247 0 24 0 4 0 28 253 11,291 548 

21-May-08 0000 0 0 18 1,247 0 0 0 16 0 16 253 11,307 712 

22-May-08 0000 0 0 18 1,247 0008 0 8 253 11,315 377 

23-May-08 0000 0 0 18 1,247 0 49 0 12 0 61 253 11,376 975 

24-May-08 0000 0 0 18 1,247 0 10 0 0 0 10 253 11,386 1,334 

25-May-08 0000 0 0 18 1,247 0 39 0 4 0 43 253 11,429 1,570 

26-May-08 0000 0 0 18 1,247 0 20 0 12 0 32 253 11,461 1,478 

27-May-08 0000 0 0 18 1,247 0 0 0 19 0 19 253 11,480 541 

28-May-08 0000 0 0 18 1,247 0 62 0 8 0 70 253 11,550 1,182 

29-May-08 0000 0 0 18 1,247 0 83 0 14 0 97 253 11,647 1,187 

30-May-08 0000 0 0 18 1,247 0000 0 0 253 11,647 1,370 

31-May-08 0000 0 0 18 1,247 0 21 0 0 0 21 253 11,668 586 

Total 0 0 0 0 0 0 18 1,247 37 3801 0 835 37 4,636 253 11,668 23,845 

Winter Run Incidental Take Levels (Oct 1 thru May 31) Spring Run Incidental Take Levels for Season Combined Total (Oct 1 thru Jun 30)Tagged Yellow Light Level = ??? SeasonTagged Red Light Level = ??? SeasonNo Tag Yellow Light Level = ??? SeasonNo Tag Red Light Level = ??? Season* This number is determined by Winter Run Length only until the tags have been read. All tags from Winter Run Length Fish have been read and numbers are updated thru

Banks T
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY HIGH

 25,847

 26,599

 27,112

 27,416

 28,245

 27,963

 28,138

 28,585

 29,240

 28,657

 27,833

 27,159

 26,524

 25,488

 24,426

 24,706

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 29,542

 28,452

 28,137

 27,301

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 15,658

 17,076

 16,869

 16,547

 16,142

 15,612

 14,906

 14,923

 15,036

 15,424

 15,967

 14,952

 12,884

 15,221

 14,756

 13,975

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 14,948

 15,493

 15,810

 15,705

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 21,311

 20,776

 20,574

 21,091

 21,501

 21,403

 21,556

 22,148

 22,624

 22,564

 22,247

 21,909

 21,613

 21,121

 20,505

 19,674

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 22,181

 22,255

 22,159

 21,994

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

JULY 2021 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: January 27, 2022

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

PORT CHICAGO BOTTOM IN SUISUN BAY
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY HIGH

 572

 572

 617

 618

 609

 596

 585

 573

 564

 569

 570

 571

 576

 579

 581

 585

 590

 601

 628

 616

 609

 0

 597

 592

 612

 611

 601

 604

 603

 612

 623

 561

 558

 558

 578

 573

 573

 571

 561

 555

 550

 556

 554

 566

 566

 567

 571

 569

 575

 561

 568

 573

 0

 570

 562

 570

 573

 578

 580

 585

 594

 587

 566

 563

 571

 593

 584

 583

 577

 568

 560

 558

 563

 563

 571

 570

 574

 579

 576

 588

 597

 590

 590

 0

 581

 579

 590

 594

 588

 596

 598

 602

 603

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

JULY 2021 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: January 27, 2022

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

DELTA MENDOTA CANAL AT CHECK 13 (O'NEILL)
# C_2012059EN.01000201.xml

| 28.2.2012 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 59/2 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

28.2.2012

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 59/2

---

Notice for the attention of the persons and entities to which restrictive measures provided for in Council Decision 2011/101/CFSP as implemented by Council Implementing Decision 2012/124/CFSP apply

2012/C 59/02

COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION,

The following information is brought to the attention of the persons and entities that appear in Annex I to Council Decision 2011/101/CFSP (1), as implemented by Council Implementing Decision 2012/124/CFSP (2).

1

2

The Council of the European Union has determined that the persons and entities that appear in the above-mentioned Annex should continue to be included in the list of persons and entities subject to restrictive measures provided for in Decision 2011/101/CFSP.

The attention of the persons and entities concerned is drawn to the possibility of making an application to the competent authorities of the relevant Member State(s) as indicated in the Annex II to Regulation (EC) No 314/2004, in order to obtain an authorisation to use frozen funds for basic needs or specific payments (cf. Article 7 of the Regulation).

The persons and entities concerned may submit a request to the Council, together with supporting documentation, that the decision to include them on the above-mentioned list should be reconsidered. Any such request should be sent to the following address:

| Council of the European Union |
| --- |
| General Secretariat |
| DG K Coordination Unit |
| Rue de la Loi/Wetstraat 175 |
| 1048 Bruxelles/Brussel |
| BELGIQUE/BELGIË |

Council of the European Union

General Secretariat

DG K Coordination Unit

Rue de la Loi/Wetstraat 175

1048 Bruxelles/Brussel

BELGIQUE/BELGIË

The attention of the persons and entities concerned is also drawn to the possibility of challenging the Council's Decision before the General Court of the European Union, in accordance with the conditions laid down in Article 275, 2nd paragraph, and Article 263, 4th and 6th paragraphs, of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union.

---

(1)  OJ L 42, 16.2.2011, p. 6.

1

(2)  OJ L 54, 28.2.2012, p. 20.

2

---
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

DAY HIGH

 19,322

 18,984

 18,178

 17,234

 16,758

 17,282

 18,219

 19,365

 20,568

 19,741

 18,795

 19,843

 20,539

 21,429

 22,613

 18,312

 18,231

 18,517

 17,705

 18,703

 19,349

 20,459

 22,399

 23,143

 23,167

 22,212

 21,723

 21,303

 21,122

 20,762

 10,468

 9,941

 9,660

 8,750

 8,564

 9,505

 10,415

 12,117

 13,272

 10,634

 10,956

 9,577

 10,155

 10,733

 11,521

 11,992

 9,543

 9,350

 9,343

 9,795

 10,894

 12,506

 12,321

 13,630

 12,622

 11,680

 9,758

 11,290

 11,193

 11,352

 15,224

 14,956

 14,341

 13,197

 13,078

 13,325

 13,920

 15,162

 16,476

 15,404

 14,609

 14,789

 15,467

 16,289

 17,814

 15,130

 14,255

 14,509

 14,410

 14,819

 15,315

 16,048

 16,808

 17,593

 17,382

 16,407

 15,267

 16,332

 16,571

 16,398

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

NOVEMBER 2015 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: December 11, 2015

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

PITTSBURG BOTTOM ON THE SACRAMENTO RIVER
**EXHIBIT      32.2**

|  | 1. | This                Periodic Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a)                or                15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d));                and |
|--|----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|  | 2. | The                information contained in the Periodic Report fairly presents, in                all                material respects, the financial condition and results of operations                of                the Company. |
|--|----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|                                        |                                       |                                   |
|---------------------------------------------|--------------------------------------------|----------------------------------------|
| Date: November                21, 2005 | By:                              | /s/ Steven                M. Bell |
|                                        |                                            |
|                                        | *Chief                  Executive Officer* |

----
#### § 225.42 Notice of the percentage amount of a cost-of-living increase.

The percentage amount of the cost-of-living increase is published in the Federal Register by the Secretary of Health and Human Services within 45 days of the end of the measuring period used in finding the increase.
### SUBCHAPTER VI—STOP HARBORING IRANIAN PETROLEUM

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Subchapter was enacted as the Stop Harboring Iranian Petroleum Act, also known as the SHIP Act, and not as part of the Comprehensive Iran Sanctions, Accountability, and Divestment Act of 2010 which comprises this chapter.
PUBLIC LAW 113–192—NOV. 26, 2014 128 STAT. 2031 

LEGISLATIVE HISTORY—S. 1499: 

CONGRESSIONAL RECORD: 

Vol. 159 (2013): Nov. 12, considered and passed Senate. 

Vol. 160 (2014): Nov. 17, considered and passed House. 

Æ 

Public Law 113–192 

113th Congress 

An Act 

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located at 278 Main 

Street in Chadron, Nebraska, as the ‘‘Sergeant Cory Mracek Memorial Post Office’’. 

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of 

the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

SECTION 1. SERGEANT CORY MRACEK MEMORIAL POST OFFICE. 

(a) DESIGNATION.—The facility of the United States Postal 

Service located at 278 Main Street in Chadron, Nebraska, shall 

be known and designated as the ‘‘Sergeant Cory Mracek Memorial 

Post Office’’. 

(b) REFERENCES.—Any reference in a law, map, regulation, 

document, paper, or other record of the United States to the facility 

referred to in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a reference 

to the ‘‘Sergeant Cory Mracek Memorial Post Office’’. 

Approved November 26, 2014. 

Nov. 26, 2014 

[S. 1499] 


ccoleman on DSK8P6SHH1 with PUBLAWLAW
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 16-50480

Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee

v.

GILBERTO BROCHE RUIZ,

Defendant-Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Western District of Texas

USDC No. 1:15-CR-312-1

Before KING, DENNIS, and COSTA, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Gilberto Broche Ruiz was convicted following a jury trial of conspiracy to 

possess and possessing with intent to distribute 500 grams or more of 

methamphetamine. He was sentenced to concurrent terms of 210 months of 

imprisonment. He appeals his conviction, arguing that he was a denied a fair 

trial because the Government elicited testimony that he had invoked his 

Fourth Amendment right to refuse a warrantless search of his cell phone.

 

* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not 

be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH 

CIR. R. 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

March 29, 2017

Lyle W. Cayce

Clerk

 Case: 16-50480 Document: 00513931644 Page: 1 Date Filed: 03/29/2017
No. 16-50480

2

Because Ruiz failed to object to the complained-of testimony, review is 

for plain error only. See Puckett v. United States, 556 U.S. 129, 135 (2009). To 

establish plain error, he must show a forfeited error that is clear or obvious 

and that affects his substantial rights. See id. In order to show that an error 

affected his substantial rights, Ruiz must demonstrate that the error affected 

the outcome of the proceedings. See id. If he makes such a showing, this court 

has the discretion to correct the error but will do so only if it seriously affects 

the fairness, integrity, or public reputation of judicial proceedings. Id.

Ruiz’s argument is unavailing. Any error is not clear or obvious as our 

court has only assumed, without deciding, that such testimony may be

improper. See United States v. Salinas, 480 F.3d 750, 759 (5th Cir. 2007). In 

any event, Ruiz fails to show that any error affected the outcome of the 

proceedings. See United States v. Runyan, 290 F.3d 223, 249-50 (5th Cir. 

2002). The record reflects that the prosecutor did not focus on or highlight 

Ruiz’s refusal to consent to a warrantless search, and the evidence of Ruiz’s 

guilt was substantial. See id. at 250-51. Thus, Ruiz fails to show that the 

error, if any, affects his substantial rights. See Puckett, 556 U.S. at 135.

AFFIRMED.

 Case: 16-50480 Document: 00513931644 Page: 2 Date Filed: 03/29/2017
## Court of Appeals

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

MANDATE

TO THE 296TH JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT OF COLLIN COUNTY, GREETINGS:

Before the Court of Appeals for the Fifth District of Texas, on the 17 th day of November

, 2104

, the cause on appeal to revise or reverse the judgment between

ALONZO GRAYSON, JR., Appellant

No. 05

- 13

- 00832

- CR V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee On Appeal from the 296th Judicial District

C ourt, Collin County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 296

- 81500

- 2012.

Opinion delivered by Justice Lang, Justices

Bridges and Evans participating.

was determined; and this Court made its order in these words:

Based on the Court’s opinion of this date, the judgment of the trial court is AFFIRMED

.

WHEREFORE, WE COMMAND YOU to observe the order of the Court of Appeals

for the Fifth District of Texas, in this behalf, and have it duly obeyed and executed.

WITNESS the HON. CAROLYN WRIGHT, Chief Justice of the Court of Appeals, with

the Seal thereof affixed, at the City of Dallas , this 11 th day of May, 2015.

LISA MATZ, Clerk
(No. 74-CC-622

#### Decatur Memorial Hospital, Claimant, *vs.*State of Illinois, Department of Mental Health, Respondent.

*Opinion filed May 15, 1974.*

Decatur Memorial Hospital, Claimant, pro se.

William J. Scott, Attorney General; William E. Webber, Assistant Attorney General, for Respondent.

Per Curiam.
### §148. Powers of State with respect to milk or cream lawfully imported

Nothing in this subchapter is intended nor shall be construed to affect the powers of any State, or any political subdivision thereof, to regulate the shipment of milk or cream into, or the handling, sale, or other disposition of milk or cream in, such State or political subdivision after the milk and/or cream shall have been lawfully imported under the provisions of this subchapter.

(Feb. 15, 1927, ch. 155, §8, 44 Stat. 1103.)
| | SHERB & CO., LLP_________________________________________________
                                                       
                                                       805 Third Ave., New York, NY 10022

Voice: (212) 838-5100	Fax: (212) 838-2676
| | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



EXHIBIT 16.1



June 6, 2013





Securities and Exchange Commission

100 F Street, N.E.

Washington, D.C. 20549-7561





We have read Item 16F included in Amendment
No. 1 to Form 20-F of FreeSeas, Inc. to be filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission.  We agree with the statements
concerning our Firm in such Form 20-F.



/s/ Sherb & Co., LLP
#### Rector Homes, Inc., Respondent, v. Jerry Walenta et al., Defendants, and Samuel D. Smoleff et al., Appellants.

Action to restrain alleged violations of covenants in lease agreements, to prevent interference with the business of plaintiff in selling dwelling houses, and for other relief. Orders denying defendants’ motions to dismiss the complaint and the four causes of action alleged therein as insufficient, affirmed, with one bill of $10 costs and disbursements, with leave to appellants to answer within ten days from the entry of the order hereon. No opinion. Hagarty, Acting P. J., Carswell, Johnston, Adel and Sneed, JJ., concur.
### §1733. Interagency Hostage Recovery Coordinator

#### (a) Interagency Hostage Recovery Coordinator

#### (1) In general

Not later than 60 days after November 25, 2015, the President shall designate an existing Federal official to coordinate efforts to secure the release of United States persons who are hostages held abroad. For purposes of carrying out the duties described in paragraph (2), such official shall have the title of "Interagency Hostage Recovery Coordinator".

#### (2) Duties

The Coordinator shall have the following duties:

(A) Coordinate activities of the Federal Government relating to each hostage situation described in paragraph (1) to ensure efforts to secure the release of hostages are properly resourced and correct lines of authority are established and maintained.

(B) Chair a fusion cell consisting of appropriate personnel of the Federal Government with purview over each hostage situation described in paragraph (1).

(C) Ensure sufficient representation of each Federal agency and department at each fusion cell established under subparagraph (B) and issue procedures for adjudication and appeal.

(D) Develop processes and procedures to keep family members of hostages described in paragraph (1) informed of the status of such hostages, inform such family members of updates that do not compromise the national security of the United States, and coordinate with the Federal Government's family engagement coordinator or other designated senior representative.

#### (b) Quarterly report and briefing

#### (1) Report

#### (A) In general

On a quarterly basis, the Coordinator shall submit to the appropriate congressional committees a report that includes a summary of each hostage situation described in subsection (a)(1).

#### (B) Form of report

Each report under this 1 subparagraph (A) may be submitted in classified or unclassified form.

#### (2) Briefing

On a quarterly basis, the Coordinator shall provide to the Senators representing the State, and the Member, Delegate, or Resident Commissioner of the House of Representatives representing the district, where a hostage described in subsection (a)(1) resides a briefing with respect to the status of such hostage.

#### (3) Appropriate congressional committees defined

In this section, the term "appropriate congressional committees" means—

(A) the Committee on Armed Services, the Committee on the Judiciary, the Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence, and the Committee on Foreign Affairs of the House of Representatives; and

(B) the Committee on Armed Services, the Committee on the Judiciary, the Select Committee on Intelligence, and the Committee on Foreign Relations of the Senate.

(Pub. L. 114–92, div. A, title X, §1092, Nov. 25, 2015, 129 Stat. 1018.)

1 So in original. The word "this" probably should not appear.
§ 408.202 How do you qualify for SVB? You qualify for SVB if you meet all of the following requirements. ( a ) *Age.* You were age 65 or older on December 14, 1999 (the date on which Pub. L. 106-169 was enacted into law).
( b ) *World War II veteran.* You are a World War II veteran as explained in § 408.216.
( c ) *SSI eligible.* You were eligible for SSI, as explained in § 408.218, for both December 1999 (the month in which Pub. L. 106-169 was enacted into law) and for the month in which you file your application for SVB.
( d ) *Application.* You file an application for SVB as explained in subpart C of this part.
( e ) *Other benefit income.* You do not have other benefit income, as explained in § 408.220, which is equal to, or more than, 75 percent of the current FBR.
AFS-16-12329-E June 23, 2016

Exemption No. 10177F Regulatory Docket No. FAA-2010-0970

Ms. Susana Castro Director of Safety & Regulatory Compliance Seaborne Virgin Islands, Inc.

d.b.a. Seaborne Airlines 268 Munoz Rivera Avenue, 9 th Floor Hato Rey, Puerto Rico 00918

Dear Ms. Castro:

This letter is to inform you that we have granted your petition to extend Exemption No. 10177, as amended. It explains the basis for our decision, describes its effect, and lists

the conditions and limitations.

The Basis for Our Decision

By letter dated May 25, 2016, you petitioned the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) on behalf of Seaborne Virgin Islands, Inc., d.b.a. Seaborne Airlines (Seaborne Airlines) for an extension of Exemption No. 10177, as amended. That exemption from part 121, appendix K, paragraph 5a of Title 14, Code of Federal Regula tions (14 CFR) allows Seaborne Airlines to continue to operate DHC-6-300 float-equipped airplanes without meeting certain aircraft performance requirements.

In your petition, you indicate that there has been no change in the conditions and reasons relative to public interest and safety that were the basis for granting the original exemption.

The FAA has determined that good cause exists for not publishing a summary of the petition in the Federal Register because the requested extension of the exemption would not set a precedent, and any delay in acting on this petition would be detrimental to Seaborne Airlines.2

Our Decision

The FAA has determined that the justification for the issuance of Exemption No. 10177, as amended, remains valid with respect to this exemption and is in the public interest. Therefore, under the authority provided by 49 U.S.C. §§ 106(f), 40113, and 44701, which the FAA Administrator has delegated to me, Seaborne Virgin Islands, Inc., d.b.a. Seaborne Airlines is granted an extension to its exemption which allows Seaborne Airlines to continue to operate DHC-6-300 float-equipped airplanes w ithout meeting certain aircraft performance requirements, subject to the following conditions and limitations.

Conditions and Limitations

1. Before conducting operations under this exemption, Seaborne Airlines must obtain an updated operations specifications A005 (Exemp tions and Deviations) that provides for operations under this exemption.

2. Seaborne Airlines must keep the checklist of ‘takeoff area cleared’ in their float plane

normal checklist.

3. Seaborne Airlines must maintain single engine operations instructions for its pilots.

This exemption terminates on June 30, 2018, unless sooner superseded or rescinded.

Sincerely,

/s/
John Barbagallo Deputy Director, Flight Standards Service