alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY HIGH

 19,862

 26,577

 18,419

 12,948

 12,177

 9,127

 7,878

 8,442

 11,445

 12,229

 12,261

 12,200

 13,368

 15,279

 13,869

 14,571

 14,612

 12,668

 12,069

 15,197

 11,185

 14,060

 13,495

 15,540

 18,257

 19,248

 18,309

 17,938

 16,710

 14,958

 12,518

 9,203

 11,025

 8,103

 5,139

 3,431

 2,783

 2,001

 1,532

 2,414

 2,474

 2,210

 1,931

 2,487

 3,054

 2,660

 2,322

 2,541

 5,756

 2,119

 2,948

 3,930

 3,536

 3,678

 3,198

 3,484

 4,062

 3,996

 3,671

 3,425

 3,026

 2,451

 12,761

 18,557

 13,976

 9,572

 8,340

 6,601

 5,342

 4,840

 5,844

 6,154

 6,027

 6,341

 6,616

 8,232

 7,343

 7,335

 8,232

 8,267

 7,213

 9,919

 7,856

 7,960

 6,842

 6,946

 8,049

 9,839

 10,394

 10,381

 10,037

 8,462

 6,871

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

DECEMBER 2001 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: January 14, 2002

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

PORT CHICAGO TOP IN SUISUN BAY
# C_2012313EN.01001002.xml

| 17.10.2012 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 313/10 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

17.10.2012

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 313/10

---

Information communicated by Member States regarding closure of fisheries

2012/C 313/08

In accordance with Article 35(3) of Council Regulation (EC) No 1224/2009 of 20 November 2009 establishing a Community control system for ensuring compliance with the rules of the common fisheries policy (1), a decision has been taken to close the fishery as set down in the following table:

1

| Date and time of closure | 17.9.2012 |
| --- | --- |
| Duration | 17.9.2012-31.12.2012 |
| Member State | United Kingdom |
| Stock or group of stocks | RED/N3M |
| Species | Redfish (Sebastes spp.) |
| Zone | NAFO 3M |
| Type(s) of fishing vessels | — |
| Reference number | FS57TQ44 |

Date and time of closure

17.9.2012

Duration

17.9.2012-31.12.2012

Member State

United Kingdom

Stock or group of stocks

RED/N3M

Species

Redfish (Sebastes spp.)

Sebastes

Zone

NAFO 3M

Type(s) of fishing vessels

—

Reference number

FS57TQ44

---

(1)  OJ L 343, 22.12.2009, p. 1.

1

---
§ 404.2121 Validation reviews. ( a ) *General.* We will conduct a validation review of a sample of the claims for payment filed by each State VR agency. We will conduct some of these reviews on a prepayment basis and some on a postpayment basis. We may review a specific claim, a sample of the claims, or all the claims filed by any State VR agency, if we determine that such review is necessary to ensure compliance with the requirements of this subpart. For each claim selected for review, the State VR agency must submit such records of the VR services and costs for which payment has been requested or made under this subpart, or copies of such records, as we may require to ensure that the services and costs meet the requirements for payment. For claims for cases described in § 404.2101(a), a clear explanation or existing documentation which demonstrates how the service contributed to the individual's performance of a continuous 9-month period of SGA must be provided. For claims for cases described in § 404.2101(b) or (c), a clear explanation or existing documentation which demonstrates how the service was reasonably expected to motivate or assist the individual to return to or continue in SGA must be provided. If we find in any prepayment validation review, that the scope or content of the information is inadequate, we will request additional information and will withhold payment until adequate information has been provided. The State VR agency shall permit us (including duly authorized representatives) access to, and the right to examine, any records relating to such services and costs. Any review performed under this section will not be considered an audit for purposes of this subpart.
( b ) *Purpose.* The primary purpose of these reviews is— ( 1 ) To ensure that the VR services and costs meet the requirements for payment under this subpart;
( 2 ) To assess the validity of our documentation requirements; and
( 3 ) To assess the need for additional validation reviews or additional documentation requirements for any State VR agency to ensure compliance with the requirements under this subpart.
( c ) *Determinations.* In any validation review, we will determine whether the VR services and costs meet the requirements for payment and determine the amount of payment. We will notify in writing the State VR agency of our determination. If we find in any postpayment validation review that more or less than the correct amount of payment was made for a claim, we will determine that an overpayment or underpayment has occurred and will notify the State VR agency that we will make the appropriate adjustment.
( d ) *Appeals.* If the State VR agency disagrees with our determination under this section, it may appeal that determination in accordance with § 404.2127. For purposes of this section, an appeal must be filed within 60 days after receiving the notice of our determination.
[59 FR 11916, Mar. 15, 1994, as amended at 83 FR 62458, Dec. 4, 2018]
ARMED SERVICES BOARD OF CONTRACTAPPEALS Application Underthe Equal Access )

to Justice Act

-- ) 

### ) Kelly-Ryan, Inc. ) 

### ) Under ContractNo. W911KB-05-C-0016 ) APPEARANCES FORTHE APPELLANT:

APPEARANCES FORTHE GOVERNMENT: ASBCANo. 57168

Dale R. Martin, Esq. Abigail Z. Staggers, Esq.

Barokas Martin & Tomlinson Seattle, WA Michael P. Goodman, Esq.

Engineer ChiefTrial Attorney Carl F. Olson, Esq.

Engineer Trial Attorney U.S. Army Engineer District, Alaska ORDER OF DISMISSAL The parties have advised the Board they have resolved the dispute regarding appellant's application for attorney fees, costs and expenses under the Equal Access to Justice Act, 5 U.S.C. 

### § 504, and have requested that the appeal be dismissed withprejudice. Accordingly, for good cause shown, the appeal is dismissed withprejudice. This dismissal leaves no appeals remaining before the Board arising from the performance ofContract No. W911KB-05-C-0016. The Board commends the parties for their successful efforts to resolve the dispute. Dated: August 15, 2018

Administrative Judge Armed Services Board ofContractAppealsI certify that the foregoing is a true copy ofthe Order ofDismissal ofthe Armed Services Board ofContract Appeals on an application for fees and other expenses incurred in connection with ASBCANo. 57168, Appeal ofKelly-Ryan, Inc., rendered in accordance with 5 U.S.C. 

### § 504. Dated:

2 JEFFREY D. GARDIN Recorder, Armed Services Board ofContract Appeals
<PAGE>

                                                                  EXHIBIT 12.1

                            PACCAR Financial Corp.
                                       
               COMPUTATION OF RATIO OF EARNINGS TO FIXED CHARGES
                    PURSUANT TO SEC REPORTING REQUIREMENTS
                            (Thousands of Dollars)

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>

                                                          Six Months Ended
                                                              June 30
                                                        1998           1997
                                                      --------      --------
<S>                                                   <C>           <C>
FIXED CHARGES
  Interest expense                                    $ 53,661      $ 49,854
  Portion of rentals deemed interest                       352           119
                                                      --------      --------

TOTAL FIXED CHARGES                                   $ 54,013      $ 49,973
                                                      --------      --------
                                                      --------      --------

EARNINGS
  Income before taxes                                 $ 23,749      $ 25,535
  Fixed charges                                         54,013        49,973
                                                      --------      --------

EARNINGS AS DEFINED                                   $ 77,762      $ 75,508
                                                      --------      --------
                                                      --------      --------

RATIO OF EARNINGS TO FIXED CHARGES                       1.44x         1.51x
</TABLE>

The method of computing the ratio of earnings to fixed charges shown above
complies with SEC reporting requirements but differs from the method called
for in the Support Agreement between the Company and PACCAR Inc.  See
Exhibit 12.2.

                                     -11-
Order entered March 3, 2015

In The 

## Court of Appeals **Fifth District of Texas at Dallas** No. 05 - 14 - 01476 - CV IN THE INTEREST OF H .D.V.,JR. AND B.V., CHILDREN On Appeal from the 302nd Judicial District Court Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 10 - 04711 

### O RDER We GRANT appellant’s February 27, 2015 motion for an extension of time to file the clerk’s record and reporter’s record. The clerk’s record and reporter’s record shall be filed by MAY 5, 2015
. /s/ ELIZABETH LANG

- MIERS JUSTICE
EXHIBIT 23

CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

We consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration Statement Nos. 333-127879 and 333-127880 on Form S-8 and
Registration Statement No. 333-141078 on Form S-3 of our reports dated November 20, 2007, relating to the financial statements and financial statement
schedule of MWI Veterinary Supply, Inc., and the effectiveness of MWI Veterinary Supply, Inc.'s internal control over financial reporting, appearing in this Annual Report on
Form 10-K of MWI Veterinary Supply, Inc. for the year ended September 30, 2007.

/s/
DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP
Boise, Idaho
November 20, 2007

---
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY ELEVATION

 238.43

 238.47

 238.35

 238.31

 238.30

 238.20

 238.16

 238.16

 238.15

 238.15

 238.17

 238.68

 238.65

 238.37

 238.50

 242.81

 240.43

 239.42

 239.75

 242.50

 240.57

 239.67

 240.00

 242.05

 242.93

 243.07

 242.28

 241.83

 242.31

 244.11

 243.90

 292

 296

 284

 280

 279

 268

 264

 264

 263

 263

 265

 317

 314

 286

 299

 903

 529

 400

 440

 850

 549

 430

 470

 772

 924

 950

 811

 737

 817

 1,154

 1,111

STORAGE

-7

+4

-12

-4

-11

-4

+0

+0

+2

+52

-3

-28

+13

+604

-374

-129

+40

+410

-301

-119

+40

+302

+152

+26

-139

-74

+80

+337

-43

CHANGE

 0

 0

 150

 150

 255

 265

 265

 265

 265

 265

 188

 117

 50

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 7,000

 6,700

 6,742

 6,779

 6,706

 6,001

 5,962

 5,984

 5,981

 5,981

 6,012

 7,179

 7,462

 7,624

 14,343

 20,746

 11,796

 10,421

 11,126

 27,894

 12,741

 11,345

 12,964

 23,842

 22,167

 23,974

 19,846

 17,462

 18,356

 24,264

 23,994

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

JANUARY 2000 RED BLUFF DIVERSION RESERVOIR DAILY OPERATIONS RUN DATE: February 2, 2000

IN LAKE

CANAL

 ACRE-FEET

TOTALS +814 2,235 399,394

ACRE-FEET +814 4,433 792,198

SUMMARY

RELEASE (ACRE-FEET)

TOTAL 796,631

 299

RELEASE

RIVER

CORNING TO SACTO

CANAL

RELEASE C.F.S

TEHAMA

COLUSA

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

CORNING CANAL 0

TEHAMA-COLUSA CANAL 4,433

TO SACTO RIVER 792,198
### §2349bb–4. Authorization of appropriations

#### (a) Authorization of appropriations

There are authorized to be appropriated to the President to carry out this part $162,000,000 for fiscal year 2003.

#### (b) Availability of funds

Funds made available under subsection (a) may be used notwithstanding any other provision of law (other than section 2304 or 2371 of this title) and shall remain available until expended.

#### (c) Treatment of appropriations

Amounts made available by the Foreign Operations, Export Financing, and Related Programs Appropriations Act, 2002, under "Nonproliferation, Antiterrorism, Demining, and Related Programs" and "Assistance for the Independent States of the Former Soviet Union" accounts for the activities described in subsection (d) shall be considered to be made available pursuant to this part.

#### (d) Covered activities

The activities referred to in subsection (c) are—

(1) assistance under the Nonproliferation and Disarmament Fund;

(2) assistance for science and technology centers in the independent states of the former Soviet Union;

(3) export control assistance; and

(4) export control and border assistance under part XI of subchapter I of this chapter or the FREEDOM Support Act (22 U.S.C. 5801 et seq.).

(Pub. L. 87–195, pt. II, §586, formerly §585, as added Pub. L. 106–280, title III, §301, Oct. 6, 2000, 114 Stat. 852; renumbered §586 and amended Pub. L. 107–228, div. B, title XIII, §§1301(a), 1303(1), Sept. 30, 2002, 116 Stat. 1435, 1436.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

The Foreign Operations, Export Financing, and Related Programs Appropriations Act, 2002, referred to in subsec. (c), is Pub. L. 107–115, Jan. 10, 2002, 115 Stat. 2118, also known as the Kenneth M. Ludden Foreign Operations, Export Financing, and Related Programs Appropriations Act, Fiscal Year 2002. For complete classification of this Act to the Code, see Tables.

The FREEDOM Support Act, referred to in subsec. (d)(4), is Pub. L. 102–511, Oct. 24, 1992, 106 Stat. 3320, also known as the Freedom for Russia and Emerging Eurasian Democracies and Open Markets Support Act of 1992. For complete classification of this Act to the Code, see Short Title note set out under section 5801 of this title and Tables.

#### Amendments

2002—Subsec. (a). Pub. L. 107–228, §1301(a)(1), substituted "$162,000,000 for fiscal year 2003" for "$129,000,000 for fiscal year 2001 and $142,000,000 for fiscal year 2002".

Subsec. (c). Pub. L. 107–228, §1301(a)(2), struck out "fiscal year 2001" before "appropriations" in heading and substituted "2002" for "2001" in text.

#### **Executive Documents**

#### Delegation of Functions

For delegation of functions of President under this section, see Ex. Ord. No. 12163, Sept. 29, 1979, 44 F.R. 56673, as amended, set out as a note under section 2381 of this title.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

DAY HIGH

 132

 106

 103

 84

 82

 75

 72

 74

 75

 74

 73

 71

 71

 72

 72

 71

 71

 72

 74

 73

 68

 70

 77

 73

 72

 70

 69

 74

 74

 74

 106

 100

 84

 78

 75

 71

 71

 71

 73

 70

 70

 68

 68

 67

 70

 69

 68

 64

 65

 66

 66

 66

 68

 67

 65

 65

 66

 65

 68

 67

 118

 102

 91

 81

 77

 72

 72

 71

 74

 72

 71

 70

 69

 69

 71

 70

 69

 67

 69

 69

 67

 67

 71

 69

 66

 67

 67

 68

 71

 70

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

APRIL 2012 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: June 5, 2012

HIGH LOW MEAN

 61.5

 60.7

 60.1

 59.1

 57.3

 56.3

 56.7

 57.1

 56.8

 55.8

 56.6

 55.6

 55.3

 55.9

 56.9

 58.4

 58.7

 58.9

 60.0

 60.2

 60.4

 60.8

 60.6

 60.7

 59.7

 60.3

 64.5

 71.2

 73.8

 75.6

 57.4

 57.1

 57.6

 56.4

 55.0

 53.9

 54.4

 55.1

 55.5

 55.1

 55.1

 54.4

 54.1

 53.9

 54.4

 56.0

 56.4

 54.3

 57.4

 58.3

 58.1

 58.6

 59.2

 58.7

 58.3

 57.5

 58.0

 61.8

 64.5

 66.4

 59.4

 59.0

 59.0

 57.9

 56.2

 55.1

 55.5

 56.1

 56.0

 55.5

 55.7

 54.9

 54.7

 54.9

 55.6

 57.0

 57.5

 57.7

 58.6

 59.3

 59.1

 59.6

 59.8

 59.7

 59.0

 58.5

 60.4

 65.6

 68.6

 70.6

HIGH LOW MEAN

 9.2

 9.4

 9.4

 9.4

 9.7

 9.9

 9.9

 9.8

 9.8

 9.8

 9.7

 9.6

 9.7

 9.7

 9.8

 9.9

 9.8

 10.1

 9.8

 9.7

 9.8

 9.7

 9.6

 9.5

 9.5

 9.5

 9.6

 9.0

 0.0

 0.0

 8.4

 8.8

 9.0

 9.3

 9.5

 9.7

 9.6

 9.5

 9.5

 9.5

 9.3

 9.5

 9.5

 9.5

 9.6

 9.6

 9.4

 9.5

 9.5

 9.5

 9.4

 9.3

 9.3

 9.3

 9.3

 9.3

 8.9

 8.2

 0.0

 0.0

 8.7

 9.1

 9.2

 9.4

 9.6

 9.8

 9.7

 9.6

 9.6

 9.6

 9.5

 9.6

 9.6

 9.6

 9.7

 9.7

 9.6

 9.7

 9.7

 9.6

 9.6

 9.5

 9.4

 9.4

 9.4

 9.4

 9.4

 8.7

 0.0

 0.0

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

RIPON ON THE STANISLAUS RIVER

 ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS WATER TEMPERATURE, DEG DISSOLVED OXYZEN, PPM
**EXHIBIT 32.2**

CERTIFICATIONPURSUANT TO RULE 13a-14(b) OF THE EXCHANGE ACT AND 18 U.S.C.SECTION 1350,AS ENACTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEYACT OF 2002

In connection withthe Quarterly Report of Intrusion Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-QSB for thethree month period ending September 30, 2006 as filed with the Securities andExchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Michael L. Paxton,Chief Financial Officer of the Company certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.Section 1350, as enacted pursuant to Section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1)                   The Report fully complieswith the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities ExchangeAct of 1934; and

(2)                   The information contained inthe Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial conditionand results of operations of the Company.
| November 13, 2006 | /s/ Michael L. Paxton   |   |
|-------------------|-------------------------|--------|
| ** **        | Michael L. Paxton       |
|              | Chief Financial Officer |

 

----
(No. 6663

#### Paul A. Hauck, Claimant, *vs.*State of Illinois, Department of Public Aid, Respondent.

*Opinion filed September 19, 1972.*

Paul A. Hauck, Claimant, pro se.

William J. Scott, Attorney General; William E. Webber, Assistant Attorney General, for Respondent.

Perlin, C.J.
§ 404.614 When an application or other form is considered filed. ( a ) *General rule.* Except as otherwise provided in paragraph (b) of this section and in §§ 404.630 through 404.633 which relate to the filing date of an application, an application for benefits, or a written statement, request, or notice is filed on the day it is received by an SSA employee at one of our offices or by an SSA employee who is authorized to receive it at a place other than one of our offices.
( b ) *Other places and dates of filing.* We will also accept as the date of filing— ( 1 ) The date an application for benefits, or a written statement, request or notice is received by any office of the U.S. Foreign Service or by the Veterans Administration Regional Office in the Philippines;
( 2 ) The date an application for benefits or a written statement, request or notice is mailed to us by the U.S. mail, if using the date we receive it would result in the loss or lessening of rights. The date shown by a U.S. postmark will be used as the date of mailing. If the postmark is unreadable, or there is no postmark, we will consider other evidence of when you mailed it to us; or
( 3 ) The date an application for benefits is filed with the Railroad Retirement Board or the Veterans Administration. See § 404.611 (b) and (c) for an explanation of when an application for benefits filed with the Railroad Retirement Board or the Veterans Administration is considered an application for social security benefits.
[44 FR 37209, June 26, 1979, as amended at 59 FR 44923, Aug. 31, 1994]
###### Editorial Note on Part 416

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 416 appear at 68 FR 53509, Sept. 11, 2003.

#### § 416.1102 What is income?

###### Cross Reference

Link to an amendment published at 89 FR 21209, Mar. 27, 2024.

Income is anything you receive in cash or in kind that you can use to meet your needs for food and shelter. Sometimes income also includes more or less than you actually receive (see §§ 416.1110 and 416.1123(b)). In-kind income is not cash, but is actually food or shelter, or something you can use to get one of these.

[70 FR 6344, Feb. 7, 2005]
A-AA+Skip to content

                  - Home
                  - Compendium Statistics
                  - Event
                  - Archives
                  - Glossary
                  - Help
                  - Contact
                  - Research on Disability

Annual Disability Statistics Compendium

              - Home /
              - Archives /
              - 2012 Compendium Statistics /
              - 2012 Federal Government Spending and Employment /
              - 2012 13.3 Federal Government Spending and Employment—Federal Expenditures on Health Care Programs

## Table 13.3: Federal Government Spending and Employment—Federal Expenditures on Health Care Programs

----

----

 

----

#### 2012 Disability Compendium

                        - Home
                        - Compendium Statistics                           - Population and Prevelance
                          - Employment
                          - Time Trend Population Statistics
                          - Poverty
                          - Earnings
                          - Veterans
                          - Health Insurance Coverage
                          - Health
                          - Social Security Administration Programs
                          - Medicaid and Medicare
                          - Special Education
                          - Vocational Rehabilitation
                          - Federal Government Spending and Employment
                          - International Disability Statistics
                          - Population Statistics: Disability Type
                        - Event
                        - Archives                           - 2012 Compendium Statistics
                        - Glossary
                        - Help
                        - Contact
                        - Research on Disability

#### Funding for this project is made possible by:

 The Research and Training Center on Disability Statistics and Demographics (StatsRRTC), which is funded by the U.S. Department of Education, National Institute for Disability and Rehabilitation Research, under cooperative agreements H133B080012.

#### Stay Connected

**Institute on Disability**10 West Edge Drive, Suite 101Durham, NH 03824603.862.4320 | relay: 711 | [email protected]www.iod.unh.edu

© 2013. Institute on Disability.University of New Hampshire.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY HIGH

 154

 153

 141

 133

 127

 128

 147

 186

 217

 228

 750

 693

 741

 881

 1,241

 1,167

 652

 431

 365

 425

 1,859

 2,703

 3,497

 3,064

 3,709

 4,180

 5,999

 7,363

 7,529

 7,691

 7,003

 117

 114

 116

 117

 119

 121

 124

 131

 133

 134

 136

 136

 146

 151

 157

 155

 162

 161

 150

 154

 169

 183

 241

 299

 296

 343

 415

 514

 666

 832

 940

 127

 125

 123

 121

 122

 124

 131

 141

 146

 154

 208

 232

 267

 298

 350

 340

 288

 249

 221

 210

 352

 584

 861

 998

 1,055

 1,242

 1,768

 2,329

 2,639

 2,855

 2,771

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

JULY 2011 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: August 24, 2011

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

PITTSBURG BOTTOM ON THE SACRAMENTO RIVER