alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1999
<CASH>                                       1,457,534
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   21,846
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                      24,771,267
<DEPRECIATION>                            (13,520,921)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              13,611,095
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0
<BONDS>                                     12,220,609
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                 (5,069,049)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                13,611,095
<SALES>                                      3,875,370
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             3,915,679
<CGS>                                        2,182,789
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                3,091,892
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               559,561
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             838,613
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (574,387)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          (574,387)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (574,387)
<EPS-BASIC>                                          0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0


</TABLE>
### §§1551, 1552. Repealed. Aug. 26, 1954, ch. 937, title V, §542(a)(6), (7), 68 Stat. 861

Section 1551, acts Feb. 14, 1950, ch. 16, §3, 64 Stat. 5; June 5, 1950, ch. 220, title I, §107(a), (b), 64 Stat. 202, related to conditions governing furnishing and termination of aid; shipping made available; appropriations; advances; and repayment.

Section 1552, acts Feb. 14, 1950, ch. 16, §4, 64 Stat. 6; June 5, 1950, ch. 220, title I, §107(c), 64 Stat. 202, related to termination of appropriation authorization period.
**Exhibit21.1**

CLAYTON HOLDINGS,INC.

LIST OFSUBSIDIARIES
| ** **                         | ** ** | **JURISDICTION OF INCORPORATION** | ** ** | **NAME UNDER WHICH**                                             |
|------------------------------------|------------|-----------------------------------|------------|------------------------------------------------------------------|
| **SUBSIDIARY NAME**                | ** ** | **OR ORGANIZATION**               | ** ** | **DOES BUSINESS**                                                |
|                               |       |                              |       |                                                             |
| GRP Holdings, Inc.                 |       | Delaware                          |       | GRP Holdings, Inc.                                               |
| Clayton Services, Inc.             |       | Delaware                          |       | Clayton Services, Inc.                                           |
| Clayton Technologies, Inc.         |       | Delaware                          |       | Clayton Technologies, Inc.                                       |
| First Madison Services, Inc.       |       | Delaware                          |       | First Madison Services, Inc.                                     |
| Quantum Servicing Corporation      |       | Delaware                          |       | Quantum Servicing Corporation                                    |
| AG NI Holdings, Inc.               |       | Delaware                          |       | Clayton Lender Solutions                                         |
| TMHC Holdings, Inc.                |       | Delaware                          |       | TMHC Holdings, Inc.                                              |
| Clayton Fixed Income Services Inc. |       | Colorado                          |       | Clayton Fixed Income Services (formerly The  Murrayhill Company) |
| Clayton IPS Corporation            |       | Colorado                          |       | Clayton IPS Corporation (formerly Murrayhill IPS  Corporation)   |

 

----
#### § 404.1290 Review of decisions by the Secretary—for wages paid prior to 1987.

*What decisions will be reviewed.* A State, under section 218(s) of the Act as it read prior to the enactment of Pub. L. 99-509, may request review of an assessment of an amount due from the State, an allowance to the State of a credit or refund of an overpayment, or a disallowance of the State's claim for credit or refund of an overpayment. The Commissioner may review regardless of whether the amount assessed has been paid or whether the credit or refund has been accepted by the State. Prior to the Commissioner's review, however, an assessment, allowance or disallowance may be reconsidered under §§ 404.1291 through 404.1293.

[53 FR 32976, Aug. 29, 1988, as amended at 62 FR 38451, July 18, 1997]
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY HIGH

 152

 152

 148

 152

 150

 148

 147

 153

 151

 148

 150

 152

 150

 151

 151

 151

 149

 146

 146

 141

 143

 145

 143

 141

 139

 140

 137

 138

 139

 141

 139

 132

 135

 139

 139

 140

 140

 138

 137

 139

 139

 140

 141

 141

 142

 142

 142

 141

 139

 136

 134

 134

 134

 134

 135

 134

 132

 132

 132

 133

 132

 132

 140

 142

 143

 144

 144

 143

 142

 142

 142

 143

 143

 144

 144

 145

 145

 144

 144

 142

 140

 137

 137

 137

 137

 137

 136

 135

 133

 134

 134

 135

 135

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

JULY 2006 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: August 3, 2006

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

RIO VISTA ON THE SACRAMENTO RIVER
**WELLS**
              
              Commercial
                Mortgage**FARGO**
              
              ServicingMAC
                A0 357-030P.O.Box
                4036, Concord, CA 945241320
                Willow Pass Rd., Suite 300Concord,
                CA 94520800
                986-9711





Management
      Assertion


February
      21, 2006







As
      of and
      for the year, ended December 31, 2005, Wells Fargo Commercial Mortgage
      Servicing, a division of Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., which is a wholly owned
      subsidiary of Wells Fargo & Company, has complied in all material respects
      with the minimum servicing
      criteria set forth in the Mortgage Bankers Association of America's (MBA) *Uniform
      Single Attestation Program for Mortgage Bankers* (USAP),
      except for minimum servicing standards V.4 and VI.1, which the MBA has
      interpreted as being inapplicable to the
      servicing of commercial and multi-family loans. As of and for the year ended
      December 31, 2005, Wells Fargo Commercial Mortgage Servicing had in effect
      a
      fidelity bond in the amount of $50,000,000 and an error and omissions policy
      in
      the amount of $50,000,000.




Very
      Truly Yours,





Wells
      Fargo Commercial Mortgage Servicing





/s/
      Kathryn O’Neal


Kathryn
      O’Neal


*Senior
      Vice President*


*Wells
      Fargo Commercial Mortgage Servicing*








/s/
      Margaret Gremore


Margaret
      Gremore


*Vice
      President*


*Wells
      Fargo Commercial Mortgage Servicing*
**PricewaterhouseCoopers
                LLP**300
                Madison AvenueNew
                York NY 10017Telephone
                (646) 471 3000Facsimile
                (646) 471 8910
  **Report
        of Independent Auditors**
  To
        the
        Board of Directors of
 GMAC
        Commercial Mortgage Corporation:
  We
        have
        examined the accompanying assertion, dated March 15, 2006 (see Exhibit I),
        by
        management of GMAC Commercial Mortgage Corporation (the "Company"), about
        the
        Company's compliance with its established minimum special servicing policy
        ("Special Servicing Policy"), which management derived from the Mortgage
        Bankers
        Association of America's Uniform
        Single Attestation Program for Mortgage Bankers ("USAP"), as of and for the
        year
        ended December 31, 2005. Management is responsible for the Company's compliance
        with the Special Servicing Policy. Our responsibility is to express an opinion
        on management's
        assertion about the Company's compliance based on our examination.
  Our
        examination was made in accordance with attestation standards established
        by the American
        Institute of Certified Public Accountants and, accordingly, included examining,
        on a test
        basis, evidence about the Company's compliance with the Special Servicing
        Policy
        and performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the
        circumstances. We believe that our examination provides a reasonable basis
        for
        our opinion. Our examination does
        not
        provide a legal determination on the Company's compliance with its Special Servicing
        Policy.
  In
        our
        opinion, management's assertion that the Company complied with the
        aforementioned Special
        Servicing Policy as of and for the year ended December 31, 2005 is fairly
        stated, in all material
        respects.
  /s/
        PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP
  March
        15,
        2006
Exhibit 99.1




                      COUNTRYWIDE HOME LOANS SERVICING LP


                             OFFICERS' CERTIFICATE
                    ANNUAL STATEMENT OF THE MASTER SERVICER


                                  CWALT, INC.
                       ALTERNATIVE LOAN TRUST 2005-23CB
             MORTGAGE PASS-THROUGH CERTIFICATES, SERIES 2005-23CB


         The undersigned do hereby certify that they are each an officer of
Countrywide GP, Inc., general partner of Countrywide Home Loans Servicing LP
(a "Master Servicer"), and do hereby further certify pursuant to Section 3.16
of the Pooling and Servicing Agreement for the above-captioned Series (the
"Agreement") that:

(i) A review of the activities of the Master Servicer during the preceding
calendar year and of the performance of the Master Servicer under the
Agreement has been made under our supervision; and

(ii) To the best of our knowledge, based on such review, the Master Servicer
has fulfilled all its obligations under the Agreement throughout such year.




/s/ Craig Baingo                                        Dated: March 27, 2006
----------------

CRAIG BAINGO
EXECUTIVE VICE PRESIDENT



/s/ Kevin Meyers                                        Dated: March 27, 2006
----------------

KEVIN MEYERS
MANAGING DIRECTOR, CHIEF FINANCIAL
OFFICER, LOAN ADMINISTRATION
###### Editorial Note on Part 46

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 46 appear by T.D. ATF-457, 66 FR 32220, 32221, June 14, 2001.

#### § 46.136 Claims.

Claims for abatement of assessment of special tax (including penalties and interest), or for refund of an overpayment of special tax (including interest and penalties), must be filed on TTB Form 5620.8. The claim must be filed with the appropriate TTB officer. Each claim must set forth in detail each ground on which it is based and must contain facts sufficient to explain to the appropriate TTB officer the exact basis for the claim. If the claim is for refund of special tax for which a stamp was issued, either the stamp must be attached to and be made a part of the claim, or the claimant must include in the claim a satisfactory explanation of the reason why the stamp cannot be submitted.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

DAY HIGH

 271

 247

 269

 279

 292

 278

 258

 265

 264

 270

 258

 259

 269

 272

 284

 271

 290

 342

 348

 310

 268

 279

 173

 169

 190

 193

 202

 209

 180

 212

 210

 203

 193

 208

 144

 129

 154

 188

 189

 206

 202

 205

 209

 213

 213

 223

 219

 148

 112

 118

 108

 123

 128

 122

 127

 152

 181

 165

 236

 226

 222

 232

 241

 212

 196

 204

 211

 225

 227

 232

 234

 237

 238

 234

 241

 263

 274

 197

 202

 204

 159

 157

 162

 169

 182

 193

 172

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

FEBRUARY 2004 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: March 10, 2004

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

RIO VISTA ON THE SACRAMENTO RIVER
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

DAY HIGH

 462

 516

 578

 565

 590

 628

 600

 627

 626

 598

 630

 655

 658

 657

 660

 643

 466

 419

 437

 422

 433

 462

 406

 439

 443

 439

 463

 491

 498

 470

 428

 434

 427

 426

 418

 392

 375

 371

 369

 369

 368

 365

 360

 352

 344

 337

 334

 337

 411

 315

 345

 392

 385

 378

 388

 350

 353

 358

 340

 328

 442

 472

 503

 477

 471

 481

 440

 435

 427

 413

 423

 427

 428

 427

 408

 406

 361

 374

 425

 390

 387

 411

 393

 398

 400

 381

 371

 383

 371

 360

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

JUNE 2001 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: July 18, 2001

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

DELTA MENDOTA CANAL AT CHECK 13 (O'NEILL)
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1996
<CASH>                                          10,990
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    6,566
<ALLOWANCES>                                       889
<INVENTORY>                                      3,732
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                25,718
<PP&E>                                         459,221
<DEPRECIATION>                                  58,887
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 433,838
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           46,930
<BONDS>                                        197,003
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           212
<OTHER-SE>                                     178,316
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   433,838
<SALES>                                        163,087
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               163,087
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  132,438
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               7,112
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 23,537
<INCOME-TAX>                                     8,469
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             15,068
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    15,068
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .70
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .70
        

</TABLE>
### SUBCHAPTER IX—TRANSFER OF CERTAIN CFE TREATY-LIMITED EQUIPMENT TO NATO MEMBERS
### §379j–61. Definitions

In this subpart:

(1) The term "affiliate" has the meaning given such term in section 379g(11) of this title.

(2) The term "gross annual sales" means the total worldwide gross annual sales, in United States dollars, for an outsourcing facility, including the sales of all the affiliates of the outsourcing facility.

(3) The term "outsourcing facility" has the meaning given to such term in section 353b(d)(4) of this title.

(4) The term "reinspection" means, with respect to an outsourcing facility, 1 or more inspections conducted under section 374 of this title subsequent to an inspection conducted under such provision which identified noncompliance materially related to an applicable requirement of this chapter, specifically to determine whether compliance has been achieved to the Secretary's satisfaction.

(June 25, 1938, ch. 675, §744J, as added Pub. L. 113–54, title I, §102(b), Nov. 27, 2013, 127 Stat. 593.)
### §1031. Repealed. Pub. L. 96–465, title II, §2205(1), Oct. 17, 1980, 94 Stat. 2159

Section, act Aug. 13, 1946, ch. 957, title VI, §671, 60 Stat. 1017, related to separation from service of consular agents.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date of Repeal

Repeal effective Feb. 15, 1981, except as otherwise provided, see section 2403 of Pub. L. 96–465, set out as an Effective Date note under section 3901 of this title.
# C_2012155EN.01000101.xml

| 1.6.2012 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 155/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

1.6.2012

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 155/1

---

Notice for the attention of the persons to which restrictive measures provided for in Council Decision 2012/285/CFSP and in Council Regulation (EU) No 377/2012, as implemented by Council Implementing Regulation (EU) No 458/2012 concerning restrictive measures directed against certain persons, entities and bodies threatening the peace, security or stability of the Republic of Guinea-Bissau apply

2012/C 155/01

COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION,

The following information is brought to the attention of the persons that appear in Annex III to Council Decision 2012/285/CFSP (1) and in Annex I to Council Regulation (EU) No 377/2012, as implemented by Council Implementing Regulation (EU) No 458/2012 (2).

1

2

The Council of the European Union has determined that the persons that appear in the above-mentioned Annexes should be included in the lists of persons which are subject to the restrictive measures provided for in Decision 2012/285/CFSP and in Regulation (EU) No 377/2012.

The attention of the persons concerned is drawn to the possibility of making an application to the competent authorities of the relevant Member State(s) as indicated in the websites in Annex II to Regulation (EU) No 377/2012, in order to obtain an authorisation to use frozen funds for basic needs or specific payments (cf. Article 4 of the Regulation).

The persons concerned may submit a request to the Council, together with supporting documentation, that the decision to include them on the above-mentioned lists should be reconsidered, to the following address:

| Council of the European Union |
| --- |
| DG C Coordination Unit |
| General Secretariat |
| Rue de la Loi/Wetstraat 175 |
| 1048 Bruxelles/Brussel |
| BELGIQUE/BELGIË |

Council of the European Union

DG C Coordination Unit

General Secretariat

Rue de la Loi/Wetstraat 175

1048 Bruxelles/Brussel

BELGIQUE/BELGIË

The attention of the persons concerned is also drawn to the possibility of challenging the Council's decision before the General Court of the European Union, in accordance with the conditions laid down in Article 275, second paragraph, and Article 263, fourth and sixth paragraphs, of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union.

---

(1)  OJ L 142, 1.6.2012, p. 36.

1

(2)  OJ L 142, 1.6.2012, p. 11.

2

---
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY HIGH

 21,416

 20,858

 20,058

 18,683

 18,522

 18,637

 19,442

 19,576

 19,702

 20,213

 20,613

 20,590

 19,704

 18,888

 18,223

 18,223

 18,028

 17,990

 17,806

 17,461

 18,416

 17,782

 19,111

 18,221

 18,634

 18,715

 19,172

 19,344

 20,324

 19,646

 19,088

 10,780

 10,859

 10,355

 10,702

 9,721

 10,832

 10,537

 10,961

 10,117

 10,216

 9,897

 7,238

 9,170

 9,256

 9,068

 9,225

 9,490

 11,082

 8,307

 6,485

 4,607

 6,307

 8,232

 8,491

 7,087

 6,017

 8,669

 8,858

 9,893

 6,200

 5,902

 15,839

 15,638

 15,347

 14,683

 13,877

 13,881

 14,623

 14,520

 14,214

 14,722

 14,326

 13,789

 13,863

 13,802

 13,217

 13,662

 13,933

 14,766

 13,631

 13,422

 10,423

 13,126

 12,459

 13,137

 12,817

 12,798

 13,143

 13,708

 14,543

 13,898

 13,794

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

AUGUST 2015 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: September 1, 2015

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

PITTSBURG BOTTOM ON THE SACRAMENTO RIVER
§ 411.510 How is the State VR agency paid under the Ticket to Work program? ( a ) The State VR agency's payment choices are described in § 411.355.
( b ) The State VR agency's decision to serve the beneficiary must be communicated to the program manager (PM). (See § 411.115(k) for a definition of the PM.) At the same time, the State VR agency must notify the PM of its selected payment system for that beneficiary.
( c ) If a beneficiary who is receiving services from the State VR agency under an existing IPE becomes eligible for a ticket that is available for assignment, the State VR agency is limited to the cost reimbursement payment system, unless both the beneficiary and the State VR agency agree to have the ticket assigned to the State VR agency (see § 411.390).
[66 FR 67420, Dec. 28, 2001, as amended at 73 FR 29346, May 20, 2008]
In the

Court of Appeals

Second Appellate District of Texas

at Fort Worth

No. 02-22-00483-CV

PAULA WOODARD, Appellant

V.

PHOI D. TU, GRANDLUX NAIL SALON 

INCORPORATED, AND PHILBERT 

NYUGEN, Appellees

§

§

§

§

On Appeal from the 431st District 

Court

of Denton County (22-5677-431)

March 9, 2023

Per Curiam Memorandum Opinion

JUDGMENT

This court has considered the record on appeal in this case and holds that the 

appeal should be dismissed. It is ordered that the appeal is dismissed for want of 

jurisdiction.

SECOND DISTRICT COURT OF APPEALS 

PER CURIAM