alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>
                                                                      EXHIBIT 28

REPORT OF INDEPENDENT PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS

To Costco Companies, Inc.:

    We have reviewed the accompanying condensed consolidated balance sheet of
Costco Companies, Inc. (a Delaware corporation) and subsidiaries as of May 9,
1999, and the related condensed consolidated statements of income for the
twelve-week and thirty-six-week periods ended May 9, 1999 and May 10, 1998, and
the condensed consolidated statements of cash flows for the thirty-six-week
periods then ended. These financial statements are the responsibility of the
Company's management.

    We conducted our review in accordance with standards established by the
American Institute of Certified Public Accountants. A review of interim
financial information consists principally of applying analytical procedures to
financial data and making inquiries of persons responsible for financial and
accounting matters. It is substantially less in scope than an audit conducted in
accordance with generally accepted auditing standards, the objective of which is
the expression of an opinion regarding the financial statements taken as a
whole. Accordingly, we do not express such an opinion.

    Based on our review, we are not aware of any material modifications that
should be made to the financial statements referred to above for them to be in
conformity with generally accepted accounting principles.

                                          ARTHUR ANDERSEN LLP

Seattle, Washington
May 25, 1999

                                       18
# C_2012298EN.01000301.xml

| 4.10.2012 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 298/3 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

4.10.2012

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 298/3

---

Update of reference amounts for the crossing of the external borders, as referred to in Article 5(3) of Regulation (EC) No 562/2006 of the European Parliament and of the Council establishing a Community Code on the rules governing the movement of persons across borders (Schengen Borders Code) (OJ C 247, 13.10.2006, p. 19; OJ C 153, 6.7.2007, p. 22; OJ C 182, 4.8.2007, p. 18; OJ C 57, 1.3.2008, p. 38; OJ C 134, 31.5.2008, p. 19; OJ C 37, 14.2.2009, p. 8; OJ C 35, 12.2.2010, p. 7; OJ C 304, 10.11.2010, p. 5; OJ C 24, 26.1.2011, p. 6; OJ C 157, 27.5.2011, p. 8; OJ C 203, 9.7.2011, p. 16; OJ C 11, 13.1.2012, p. 13; OJ C 72, 10.3.2012, p. 44; OJ C 199, 7.7.2012, p. 8)

2012/C 298/03

The publication of reference amounts for the crossing of the external borders, as referred to in Article 5(3) of Regulation (EC) No 562/2006 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 15 March 2006 establishing a Community Code on the rules governing the movement of persons across borders (Schengen Borders Code) (1), is based on the information communicated by the Member States to the Commission in accordance with Article 34 of the Schengen Borders Code.

1

In addition to the publication in the Official Journal, a monthly update is available on the website of the Directorate-General for Home Affairs.

LATVIA

Replacement of the information published in OJ C 247, 13.10.2006

Replacement of the information published in OJ C 247, 13.10.2006

According to the Immigration Law, in order to be able to enter and stay in the Republic of Latvia an alien must prove that he or she has the necessary means of subsistence.

The amount required is no less than LVL 10 per day of stay.

Where it is indicated in the electronic database of invitations, or on the form ‘Ielūgums vīzas pieprāšanai/Invitation for requesting a visa’ laid down by the Office of Citizenship and Migration Affairs, that the host will cover the expenses related to the alien’s entry and stay in Latvia, the alien does not have to submit the documents proving the availability of the necessary means of subsistence.

Ielūgums vīzas pieprāšanai

If necessary, the alien must show that he or she possesses financial resources sufficient to pay for the planned accommodation and/or, if travelling with a private vehicle, financial resources sufficient to buy the fuel needed for the journey.

---

(1)  OJ L 105, 13.4.2006, p. 1.

1

---
### SUBCHAPTER VII—ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEDURE
#### § 408.301 What is this subpart about?

This subpart contains our rules about filing applications for SVB. It explains what an application is, who may sign it, where and when it must be signed and filed, the period of time it is in effect, and how it may be withdrawn. This subpart also explains when a written statement or an oral inquiry may be considered to establish your application filing date.
**Exhibit 99.1:**

 

Additional Exhibits

 

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT

TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADPOTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

 

In connection with thequarterly Report of F&M Bancorp (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the periodending June 30, 2002 as file with the Securities and Exchange Commission on thedate hereof (the “Report”), I, Faye E Cannon, President and Chief ExecutiveOfficer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adoptedpursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

1)   TheReport fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2)   Theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.

 

 
|            |   |   |               |   |
|-----------------|--------|--------|--------------------|--------|
| August 12, 2002 |   |   | /s/ Faye E. Cannon |   |
| Date            |   |   | FAYE E. CANNON     |   |
|            |   |   | PRESIDENT AND CEO  |   |
|            |   |   |               |   |

 

----
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

DAY HIGH

 12,319

 12,663

 12,363

 13,384

 12,301

 13,554

 13,274

 12,600

 12,768

 12,843

 11,417

 13,679

 12,045

 11,135

 11,934

 11,424

 12,444

 10,499

 10,992

 12,276

 9,714

 10,368

 10,662

 10,908

 11,690

 10,281

 11,606

 11,559

 10,831

 9,729

 5,484

 5,422

 5,595

 5,773

 5,870

 5,702

 5,492

 5,003

 4,450

 3,922

 4,135

 4,432

 3,827

 4,338

 4,294

 4,415

 4,785

 4,381

 3,654

 3,496

 3,149

 3,039

 3,425

 3,504

 3,462

 4,102

 3,163

 4,773

 3,224

 3,422

 8,821

 8,331

 8,339

 8,541

 8,344

 8,720

 8,605

 8,578

 8,241

 7,098

 7,611

 8,046

 7,508

 7,804

 7,897

 7,300

 7,502

 6,990

 6,450

 6,333

 5,623

 5,852

 6,411

 6,852

 6,920

 7,011

 7,236

 7,828

 7,226

 6,548

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

SEPTEMBER 2012 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: November 15, 2012

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

PITTSBURG TOP ON THE SACRAMENTO RIVER
#### In the Matter of the Claim of Raymond Miller, Appellant, against Lisk Manufacturing Company et al., Respondents. State Industrial Board, Respondent.

All concur.
#### Chester L. OUGHTON, Appellant, v. UNITED STATES of America, Appellee.

Misc. No. 382.

United States Court of Appeals Ninth Circuit.

Sept. 7, 1954.

*579Chester L. Oughton, in propria persona.

William T. Plummer, U. S. Atty., Anchorage, Alaska, for appellee.

Before DENMAN, Chief Judge, and BONE and ORR, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

Oughton, having appealed to this court from the district court’s order in a 28 U.S.C. § 2255 proceeding denying his motion to set aside his life sentence, seeks our order to proceed forma pauperis with his appeal.

It appears from the records of the district court of which we take judicial notice1 that Oughton plead guilty on the same day to the offense for which he was given a life sentence and two other sentences, upon one of which he received a five-year sentence and upon another of which he received a year and a day. The sentences running concurrently were imposed on December 17, 1952.

From the above it is apparent that if he were successful in his present § 2255 proceeding attacking his life sentence, he would not be released from custody. Nor does his § 2255 motion allege that he is “claiming the right to be released” from custody as required by the following provision of § 2255:

> “§ 2255. Federal custody; remedies on motion attacking sentence

> “A prisoner in custody under sentence of a court established by Act of Congress *claiming the right to he released*upon the ground that the sentence was imposed in violation of the Constitution or laws of the United States, or that the court was without jurisdiction to impose such sentence, or that the sentence was in excess of the maximum authorized by law, or is otherwise subject to collateral attack, *may move the court*which imposed the sentence to vacate, set aside or correct the sentence.

> “A motion for such relief may be made at any time.” (Emphasis supplied.)

Obviously, the motion must be made by a prisoner “claiming the right to be released”. As stated by the Supreme Court the “sole purpose” in enacting this section “was to minimize the difficulties encountered in habeas corpus hearings by affording the same rights in another and more convenient forum.” United States v. Hayman, 342 U.S. 205, 219, 72 S.Ct. 263, 272, 96 L.Ed. 232. In habeas corpus the applicant has no right to have adjudicated the validity of a sentence where, if adjudicated in his favor, he would still be confined in the same penitentiary under another existing sentence.

Since the § 2255 motion on its face showed no ground existed to invoke it, the district court was not required to bring Oughton before it in the proceeding in which it held the motion should be denied.

The motion to prosecute the appeal forma pauperis is ordered denied.

1

. Lopez v. Swope, 9 Cir., 205 F.2d 8, 9.
p. 1 

# OAR Box 1828 Prepped by Ollie Stewart



### Document

Number: 

# 197 ) ll-K-(I)- 9 Docket Number: 

# A-83-2 7

Printed 11/12/2008 11:12:55 AM Sheet 197 of 325P. 2 

# /A \ 

# Pl
II-K-(I)- 9

LATES T EQUIPMEN T AND DESIGN FO RNE W COAL-FIRE D PLANT S AND TH E CONVERSIO N

O F EXISTING PLANT S T O COAL FIRING . Siebold , P.F . an

d R.D . Bessette . Rile y Stoke r Corp . Presente d a t th e Industria l Fue l Conference , Purdu e U. , Lafayette . Octobe r 6-7 , 1976 . THI S INFORMATION

CA N B E FOUND I

N DOCKE T A-79-02 , ITE

M II-K-(I)- 9
### §§1531 to 1536. Repealed. Aug. 26, 1954, ch. 937, title V, §542(a)(4), (6), 68 Stat. 861

Section 1531, act Apr. 3, 1948, ch. 169, title II, §202, 62 Stat. 157, related to purpose.

Section 1532, acts Apr. 3, 1948, ch. 169, title II, §203, 62 Stat. 157; July 14, 1949, ch. 336, §1, 63 Stat. 412, related to contributions.

Section 1533, act Apr. 3, 1948, ch. 169, title II, §204, 62 Stat. 157, related to limitations on contributions.

Section 1534, acts Apr. 3, 1948, ch. 169, title II, §205, 62 Stat. 157; July 14, 1949, ch. 336, §1, 63 Stat. 412, related to appropriations and availability thereof as relief aid to war devastated countries.

Section 1535, acts Apr. 3, 1948, ch. 169, title II, §206, 62 Stat. 157; July 1, 1949, ch. 336, §1, 63 Stat. 412, related to amount of appropriations in amount of $60,000,000.

Section 1536, act June 5, 1950, ch. 220, title V, §501, 64 Stat. 209, related to additional appropriations in amount of $15,000,000 and made certain funds appropriated by Foreign Aid Appropriation Act, 1949, available through June 30, 1951.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Repeal of Additional Appropriations

Acts June 20, 1952, ch. 449, §12, 66 Stat. 151; Oct. 10, 1951, ch. 479, title V, §545, as added by act July 16, 1953, ch. 195, ch. VI, §603, 67 Stat. 155, were repealed by act Aug. 26, 1954, §542(a)(9)–(11).
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

DAY HIGH

 570

 1,106

 334

 1,221

 1,566

 2,421

 2,585

 2,836

 2,527

 1,924

 1,755

 1,812

 1,958

 1,841

 2,112

 4,497

 7,806

 7,413

 6,041

 4,574

 4,031

 3,230

 3,146

 2,464

 2,203

 2,570

 2,656

 2,415

 2,505

 272

 275

 260

 278

 272

 278

 307

 315

 335

 364

 379

 400

 425

 405

 388

 426

 659

 802

 733

 714

 685

 638

 610

 615

 576

 554

 551

 520

 495

 328

 395

 285

 445

 427

 543

 634

 706

 729

 733

 759

 746

 735

 681

 744

 1,132

 2,688

 3,079

 2,128

 1,594

 1,444

 1,200

 1,201

 1,086

 1,024

 1,031

 918

 840

 815

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

FEBRUARY 2016 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: March 3, 2016

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

PITTSBURG BOTTOM ON THE SACRAMENTO RIVER
$+

$+$+

U+

")

Apiary

Cavin Easement

Sturrock Road

Gaging Station

MID Cabin

6S

22E

6S

23E

7S

22E

6S

21E

7S

23E

7S

21E

022

007

011

034

036

027

019

018

013

023

007

012

024

018

015

021

019

031

030

010

020

033

030

025

008

017

026

029

028

016

035

009

031 032

014

005

004

006

006

003

001

002

012

002

013

001

024

003

006

025

004

036

005 006

032

001

029

020

001

017

005

Old Corral

McLeod Flat

Cedar Valley

Willow Creek

Calvin Crest

Sivels Ranch

Soquel Meadow

Poison Meadow

Redwood Creek

Greys Mountain

Chilkoot Creek

Gooseberry Flat

Sivels Mountain

Chipmunk Meadow

Bass Lake Vista

Graham Mountain

Paradise Springs

California Creek

Soquel Campground

Soquel Meadow Ranch

Cold Springs Meadow

Chilkoot Campground

Nelder Grove Campground

Greys Mountain Campground

Texas Flat Group Campground

05S007

06S010

06S008

06S090

06S040

06S038

06S013

06S042

06S011

06S036

06S006

06S010X

06S040X

MAD222

06S097

06S099

06S057

05S095

05S019

06S088

06S072

06S039

06S040XB

06S010XC

05S018

06S098

MAD632

07S082

07S520B

06S095

06S058X

06S002X

06S010R

06S011A

05S019B

06S018

06S057A

06S047Y

05S039

07S006

06S011X

06S040XA

07S019

05S007N

06S013B

06S070

06S006G

06S028

06S038C

06S006F

06S026X

06S072Y

06S011C

06S008C

05S095YC

07S520

06S038A

06S090B

06S065

06S013D

05S007R

06S010Y

06S038X

06S090E

06S013H

06S002XB

05S095Y

06S028B

06S010YB

06S040D

06S032

06S088D

06S504

06S013G

06S036A

06S047YA

05S007Z

06S013C

06S013F

06S008A

06S011B

06S038E

06S006C

06S010A

06S013A

06S095A

06S011E

06S011F

06S013E

06S012B

06S038G

05S007TA

06S098B

06S010YA

06S002XA

06S039A

06S072A

06S099B

06S097A

06S006A

06S028A

06S090G

06S065A 06S010B

008

005

Scale

0 0.25 0.5 1 1.5 2

Miles

4

Legend

Project Boundary

Private Property

") Apiary

U+ Gaging_Station

$+ Hall-Texas Flat Overflow

$+ Madera Irrigation District Cabin

Cavin Easement

Sturrock Easement

Hall_Mine_Location

Grey's Mountain Ecological Restoration Project Map 5

Special Uses

Burt Stalter 11/2011

1:48,000
#### Kline Brothers & Company, Appellant, v. The Hanover Fire Insurance Company of the City of New York, Respondent.

Judgement and order affirmed, with costs. (See *Kline Brothers & Co.*v. *Hanover Fire Ins.*Co., 155 App. Div. 929; *Royal Insurance Co.*v. *Kline Bros. &*Co., 198 Fed. Rep. 468.) Present—Ingraham, P. J., McLaughlin, Laughlin, Scott and Dowling, JJ.
I 

114TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 3802 

To amend title 18, United States Code, to provide for the disposition, within 

60 days, of an application to exempt a projectile from classification 

as armor piercing ammunition. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

OCTOBER 22, 2015 

Mr. BABIN (for himself, Mr. COLLINS of New York, Mr. BROOKS of Alabama, 

Mr. GOSAR, Ms. JENKINS of Kansas, Mr. JOHNSON of Ohio, Mr. JOYCE, 

Mr. LAMBORN, Mr. LAMALFA, Mr. MILLER of Florida, Mr. ROGERS of 

Alabama, Mr. SESSIONS, Mr. POE of Texas, Mr. GROTHMAN, Mr. ZINKE, 

and Mr. KELLY of Pennsylvania) introduced the following bill; which was 

referred to the Committee on the Judiciary 

A BILL 

To amend title 18, United States Code, to provide for the 

disposition, within 60 days, of an application to exempt 

a projectile from classification as armor piercing ammunition. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Alternative Ammuni5 tion Manufacturing Act’’. 


smartinez on DSK4TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 3802 IH

1 SEC. 2. DEADLINE FOR DECISION ON APPLICATION TO EX2 EMPT PROJECTILE FROM CLASSIFICATION 

3 AS ARMOR PIERCING AMMUNITION. 

4 Section 921(a)(17) of title 18, United States Code, 

5 is amended by adding at the end the following: 

6 ‘‘(D)(i) An application to exempt a projectile 

7 from classification as armor piercing ammunition, 

8 that is received by the Attorney General on or after 

9 August 1, 2011, is deemed approved if the Attorney 

10 General does not disapprove the application within 

11 60 days after the later of— 

12 ‘‘(I) the date the application is so received; 

13 or 

14 ‘‘(II) the date of the enactment of this 

15 subparagraph. 

16 ‘‘(ii) If the Attorney General disapproves such 

17 an application, the Attorney General shall provide 

18 the applicant, in writing, with detailed findings of 

19 fact and the reasons for the disapproval.’’. 

Æ 


smartinez on DSK4TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
§ 218.38 When a spouse annuity ends. ( a ) *General rules.* A spouse annuity ends with the earliest of— ( 1 ) The last day of the month before the month in which the spouse dies;
( 2 ) The last day of the month before the month in which the employee dies or the employee's entitlement to an annuity ends;
( 3 ) The last day of the month before the month in which the spouse's marriage to the empoyee is ended by absolute divorce, annulment, or other judicial action (the spouse may be entitled to a divorced spouse annuity as explained in part 216 of this chapter); or
( 4 ) The month shown in paragraphs (b) and (d) of this section.
( b ) *Annuity entitlement based on “child in care.”* A spouse annuity based on having a “child in care” ends as shown in this paragraph if he or she is not also eligible for a full-age spouse annuity as explained in part 216 of this chapter. However, see also paragraph (c) of this section. If the spouse is eligible for a full-age spouse annuity when he or she is no longer entitled on the basis of a child, his or her annuity is changed to a spouse annuity based on age. A spouse annuity based on having a “child in care” ends with the earliest of— ( 1 ) The last day of the month shown in paragraphs (a) and (d) of this section;
( 2 ) The last day of the month before the month in which the child is no longer in the spouse's care, as explained in part 216 of this chapter;
( 3 ) The last day of the month before the month in which the child attains age 18 and is not disabled;
( 4 ) The last day of the month before the month in which the child marries;
( 5 ) The last day of the month before the month in which the child dies; or
( 6 ) The last day of the second month after the month in which the child's disability ends, if the child is over age 18.
( c ) *Tier I benefit entitlement based on “child in care.”* The tier I benefit of a spouse entitled because he or she has a “child in care” and is not otherwise entitled to a tier I benefit based on age, ends with the earliest of— ( 1 ) The last day of the month shown in paragraphs (a) and (d) of this section;
( 2 ) The last day of the month before the month in which the child is no longer in the spouse's care as explained in part 216 of this chapter;
( 3 ) The last day of the month before the month in which the child attains age 16 and is not disabled;
( 4 ) The last day of the month before the month in which the child marries;
( 5 ) The last day of the month before the month in which the child dies; or
( 6 ) The last day of the second month after the month in which the child's disability ends, if the child is over age 16.
( d ) *Entitlement based on deemed marriage.* If the spouse entitlement is based on a deemed valid marriage, the annuity ends with the earliest of— ( 1 ) The last day of the month shown in paragraphs (a) and (b) of this section;
( 2 ) The last day of the month before the month in which the deemed spouse enters a valid marriage with someone other than the employee; or
( 3 ) The last day of the month before the month in which the Board approves an award to someone else as the employee's legal spouse.
§ 355.47 Limitations. ( a ) The notice of hearing with respect to a claim or statement must be served in the manner specified in § 355.8 within 6 years after the date on which such claim or statement is made.
( b ) If the defendant fails to file a timely answer, service of a notice under § 355.10(b) shall be deemed a notice of hearing for purposes of this section.
( c ) The statute of limitations may be extended by agreement of the parties.
§ 205.2 Definition of employee representative. ( a ) An individual shall be an employee representative within the meaning of the Railroad Retirement Act if he or she is an officer or official representative of a railway labor organization, other than a labor organization included in the term “employer” within the meaning of part 202 of these regulations, who before or after August 29, 1935, was in the service of an “employer” within the meaning of part 202 of these regulations and who is duly authorized and designated to represent employees in accordance with the Railway Labor Act, as amended.
( b ) An individual is also considered to be an employee representative within the meaning of the Act if he or she is regularly assigned to or regularly employed by an individual described in paragraph (a) of this section in connection with the duties of the office of employee representative of said individual.
( c ) *Example:* A is employed by railroad R as a carman. He is also employed as recording secretary for the local chapter of union U, which has been recognized as the collective bargaining representative of the carmen of R. Although U represents some railroad employees, it is not a railway labor organization as described in part 202 of these regulations. A is an employee representative. His service for U is treated as employee service under the Railroad Retirement Act.
### SUBCHAPTER IV—PERSONNEL CATEGORIES AND SALARIES
#### Charles A. Brown, Respondent, v. Agnes Brown, Appellant.

Motions for leave to appeal to the Court of Appeals denied, without costs. Present— Jenks, P. J., Thomas, Carr, Rich and Putnam, JJ.