alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
### §1373. Suspension of Philippine Trade Act of 1946

The Philippine Trade Act of 1946 [22 U.S.C. 1251 et seq.] (except section 506(a) of this title [22 U.S.C. 1356] relating to termination of payments into Philippine Treasury, and except amendments and repeals made by such Act) shall not apply during such time as the revised agreement is in effect.

(Aug. 1, 1955, ch. 438, title III, §302, 69 Stat. 426.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

The Philippine Trade Act of 1946, referred to in text, is act Apr. 30, 1946, ch. 244, 60 Stat. 141, which is classified principally to subchapters I to IV of this chapter. Subchapters I, II, and III of this chapter were omitted from the Code. For complete classification of this Act to the Code, see Short Title note set out under section 1354 of this title and Tables.

The revised agreement, referred to in text, was set out as a note under section 1371 of this title.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date

Act Aug. 1, 1955, ch. 438, title III, §301(b), 69 Stat. 426, provided that: "The provisions of this title [enacting sections 1373 to 1379 of this title and amending section 734 of Title 48, Territories and Insular Possessions] shall take effect on January 1, 1956, but only if the President of the United States has made the proclamation referred to in subsection (a) [section 1379 of this title]."

#### Short Title

Act Aug. 1, 1955, ch. 438, title I, §1, 69 Stat. 413, provided that: "This Act [enacting this subchapter and amending section 734 of Title 48, Territories and Insular Possessions] may be cited as the 'Philippine Trade Agreement Revision Act of 1955'."
§ 10.621 What is the employer's role when an oral hearing has been requested? ( a ) The employer may send one (or more, if deemed appropriate by the hearing representative) representative(s) to observe the proceeding, but the agency representative cannot give testimony or argument or otherwise participate in the hearing, except where the claimant or the hearing representative specifically asks the agency representative to testify.
( b ) The hearing representative may deny a request by the claimant that the agency representative testify where the claimant cannot show that the testimony would be relevant or where the agency representative does not have the appropriate level of knowledge to provide such evidence at the hearing. The employer may also comment on the hearing transcript, as described in § 10.617(e).
### SUBCHAPTER IV—COMPENSATION
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

DAY HIGH

 18,938

 18,362

 17,391

 17,347

 16,517

 15,904

 16,476

 16,900

 16,855

 13,998

 11,344

 8,299

 8,493

 7,229

 6,908

 6,629

 6,034

 5,358

 6,657

 6,606

 7,015

 6,943

 9,237

 10,302

 10,094

 11,248

 12,838

 12,013

 10,163

 9,272

 9,474

 9,496

 8,890

 8,254

 8,511

 7,837

 7,299

 4,764

 3,426

 1,998

 2,105

 1,808

 1,870

 1,833

 1,821

 1,646

 1,752

 1,648

 1,752

 1,772

 1,864

 1,986

 2,351

 2,793

 3,481

 4,370

 13,666

 13,460

 13,198

 12,281

 11,655

 11,392

 11,942

 12,435

 11,420

 9,218

 7,151

 5,411

 4,306

 3,631

 3,697

 3,513

 3,196

 3,087

 3,284

 3,022

 3,265

 3,792

 4,504

 4,791

 5,560

 6,264

 7,230

 7,374

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

FEBRUARY 2014 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: June 6, 2014

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

PITTSBURG TOP ON THE SACRAMENTO RIVER
# C_2012196EN.01002201.xml

| 4.7.2012 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 196/22 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

4.7.2012

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 196/22

---

Corrigendum to the Commission communication in the framework of the implementation of the Council Directive 89/686/EEC of 21 December 1989 on the approximation of the laws of the Member States relating to personal protective equipment

(
  Official Journal of the European Union C 45 of 16 February 2012
  )

Official Journal of the European Union C 45 of 16 February 2012

2012/C 196/15

On page 22:

for:

| ‘CEN | EN ISO 20345:2011
  Personal protective equipment - Safety footwear (ISO 20345:2011) | This is the first publication | EN ISO 20345:2004
  Note 2.1 | 30.6.2012’ |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |

‘CEN

EN ISO 20345:2011

Personal protective equipment - Safety footwear (ISO 20345:2011)

This is the first publication

EN ISO 20345:2004

Note 2.1

30.6.2012’

read:

| ‘CEN | EN ISO 20345:2011
  Personal protective equipment - Safety footwear (ISO 20345:2011) | This is the first publication | EN ISO 20345:2004
  Note 2.1 | 30.6.2013’ |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |

‘CEN

EN ISO 20345:2011

Personal protective equipment - Safety footwear (ISO 20345:2011)

This is the first publication

EN ISO 20345:2004

Note 2.1

30.6.2013’

---
================================================================================

EXHIBIT 32.1


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
            RULE 13a-14(1) OR RULE 15d-14(b) AND 18 U.S.C. SEC. 1350,
                    AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE
                           SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the annual report of Dujour  Products,  Inc., (the "Company")
on Form 10-KSB for the year ended December 31, 2006 as filed with the Securities
Exchange  Commission  on the date hereof  (the  "Report"),  I,  Adrian  Crimeni,
Principal  Executive  Officer and  Principal  Financial  Officer of the Company,
certify  pursuant to 18 U.S.C.  Sec. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:


         (1)  The report fully complies with the  requirements  of Section 13(a)
              or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2)  The information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in all
              material  respects,   the  financial   condition  and  results  of
              operation of the company.


Date:   April 4, 2007                 /s/ Adrian Crimeni
                                      -----------------------------------
                                        (Signature)

                                        Principal Executive Officer, and
                                        Principal Financial Officer
                                      -----------------------------------
                                        (Title)


















--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
NOTICE: NOT FOR OFFICIAL PUBLICATION.

UNDER ARIZONA RULE OF THE SUPREME COURT 111(c), THIS DECISION IS NOT PRECEDENTIAL

AND MAY BE CITED ONLY AS AUTHORIZED BY RULE.

IN THE

ARIZONA COURT OF APPEALS

DIVISION ONE

In the Matter of: 

LORENA LOPEZ, Petitioner/Appellant, 

v.

MANUEL MEJIA, Respondent/Appellee. 

No. 1 CA-CV 20-0558 FC 

Appeal from the Superior Court in Maricopa County

No. FC2016-070840 

The Honorable J. Justin McGuire, Judge Pro Tempore 

AFFIRMED

COUNSEL

Lorena Lopez, Buckeye

Petitioner/Appellant 

FILED 6-8-2021
LOPEZ v. MEJIA

Decision of the Court

2

MEMORANDUM DECISION

Presiding Judge David B. Gass delivered the decision of the Court, in which 

Judge Michael J. Brown and Judge David D. Weinzweig joined.

G A S S, Judge:

¶1 Lorena Lopez challenges the superior court’s order 

terminating a spousal maintenance order entered in 2016. We affirm. 

FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY

¶2 Wife petitioned to dissolve the parties’ marriage. The superior

court entered a decree in September 2016 obligating Manuel Mejia to pay 

$3,000.00 in monthly spousal maintenance for four years starting on 

October 1, 2016. The superior court entered an income withholding order 

with a presumptive termination date of September 30, 2020.

¶3 Husband petitioned to modify the income withholding order

in July 2020, contending his “[f]irst [spousal maintenance] payment was 

made on 9/7/2016” and “seeking any overpayment refund.” Wife opposed 

the petition, contending she did not receive the first payment until October 

4, 2016, and the “[l]ast payment is scheduled for September 30, 2020.”

Following an evidentiary hearing the superior court granted husband’s 

petition and terminated the spousal maintenance order as of August 28, 

2020.

¶4 Wife moved for reconsideration, arguing the superior court 

relied on an incorrect arrears calculation report and she was still owed 

$1,480.55. The superior court denied the motion. 

¶5 Wife timely appealed. This court has jurisdiction under article 

VI, section 9, of the Arizona Constitution, and A.R.S. § 12-120.21.A.1.

ANALYSIS

¶6 This court reviews the ruling on husband’s petition for an 

abuse of discretion. In re Marriage of Priessman, 228 Ariz. 336, 338, ¶ 7 (App. 

2011).
LOPEZ v. MEJIA

Decision of the Court

3

¶7 Wife argues the superior court applied an erroneous arrears 

calculation report. She cites no record evidence to support her argument

and did not provide a transcript of the evidentiary hearing. An appellant 

contending a conclusion is unsupported by or contrary to the evidence 

“must include in the record transcripts of all proceedings containing 

evidence relevant to that . . . conclusion.” ARCAP 11(c)(1)(B). Because wife 

did not provide the necessary record documents, we presume the evidence 

presented at the hearing supported the superior court’s findings and 

conclusions. See Hefner v. Hefner, 248 Ariz. 54, 60, ¶ 19 (App. 2019). 

CONCLUSION

¶8 We affirm the superior court’s order. We decline to award 

attorney fees or costs because husband did not file an answering brief.
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Giuseppe Adrogna and Dominick Fusaro, Appellants. (2 cases.)

Orders affirmed. Ho opinion. Present — Ingraham, P. J., Clarke, Scott, Dowling and Hotchkiss, JJ.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY ELEVATION

 238.68

 238.73

 238.73

 238.70

 238.71

 238.73

 238.75

 238.72

 238.74

 238.95

 238.97

 239.15

 238.85

 238.94

 238.95

 238.94

 238.93

 238.88

 238.73

 238.62

 238.63

 238.64

 238.63

 238.64

 238.68

 238.53

 238.70

 238.66

 239.05

 238.83

 238.96

 317

 322

 322

 319

 320

 322

 325

 321

 323

 345

 347

 368

 335

 344

 345

 344

 343

 338

 322

 311

 312

 313

 312

 313

 317

 302

 319

 315

 356

 333

 346

STORAGE

-2

+5

+0

-3

+1

+2

+3

-4

+2

+22

+2

+21

-33

+9

+1

-5

-16

-11

+1

+1

+1

+4

-15

+17

-4

+41

-23

+13

CHANGE

 173

 178

 172

 174

 213

 245

 190

 187

 194

 193

 172

 50

 50

 49

 60

 25

 25

 72

 91

 98

 97

 83

 52

 58

 83

 121

 25

 0

 0

 0

 0

 7,349

 7,762

 7,602

 7,570

 7,421

 7,463

 7,460

 7,211

 7,164

 9,146

 9,154

 9,211

 9,102

 9,046

 8,934

 9,114

 8,996

 8,712

 8,664

 8,398

 8,342

 8,216

 8,193

 8,301

 8,026

 8,297

 8,315

 9,616

 9,745

 8,710

 9,125

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

OCTOBER 2000 RED BLUFF DIVERSION RESERVOIR DAILY OPERATIONS RUN DATE: November 29, 2000

IN LAKE

CANAL

 ACRE-FEET

TOTALS +30 3,130 260,365

ACRE-FEET +30 6,208 516,434

SUMMARY

RELEASE (ACRE-FEET)

TOTAL 523,838

 319

RELEASE

RIVER

CORNING TO SACTO

CANAL

RELEASE C.F.S

TEHAMA

COLUSA

 55

 51

 56

 54

 47

 28

 35

 38

 34

 2

 10

 0

 0

 10

 89

 0

 0

 0

 17

 0

 0

 0

 23

 0

 0

 21

 0

 0

 0

 16

 17

 603

 1,196

CORNING CANAL 1,196

TEHAMA-COLUSA CANAL 6,208

TO SACTO RIVER 516,434

Table 9
### §262g–1. Targeting assistance to specific populations

#### (a) Congressional findings

The Congress finds that there is a need for concerted international efforts to deal with the problems of malnutrition, low life expectancy, childhood disease, underemployment, and low productivity in developing countries.

#### (b) Assistance to poorest populations

The Congress notes with approval that the Inter-American Development Bank, under the terms of its Fifth Replenishment, has adopted the target that 50 percent of its lending benefit the poorest groups and has developed a usable methodology for determining the proportion of its lending which benefits such groups.

(Pub. L. 95–118, title XI, §1101, as added Pub. L. 97–35, title XIII, §1361(b), Aug. 13, 1981, 95 Stat. 745.)

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date

Section effective Aug. 13, 1981, see section 1372 of Pub. L. 97–35, set out as a note under section 290i of this title.
Exhibit 99.1        Officer's Certificate regarding Annual Statement of
                    Compliance of Washington Mutual Mortgage Securities Corp.

                   WASHINGTON MUTUAL MORTGAGE SECURITIES CORP.
                              OFFICER'S CERTIFICATE

The undersigned officer of Washington Mutual Mortgage Securities Corp., a
Delaware corporation (the "Servicer") hereby certifies on behalf of the Servicer
and on his own behalf for purposes of the WaMu Mortgage Pass-Through
Certificates, Series 2005-AR6, as follows:

1. I am the duly appointed and qualified President of the Servicer.

2. Capitalized terms used and not defined herein shall have the meanings
ascribed to such terms in the Pooling and Servicing Agreement related to the
above-referenced series of Certificates.

3. I am duly authorized to execute and deliver this Officer's Certificate on
behalf of the Servicer.

4. A review of the activities of the Servicer during the preceding
calendar year and performance under this Agreement has been made under my
supervision.

5. To the best of my knowledge, based on such review, the Servicer has
fulfilled all its obligations under the Agreement throughout such year.



     IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have signed my name as of March 30, 2006.





                   WASHINGTON MUTUAL MORTGAGE SECURITIES CORP.


                     By: /s/ Thomas G. Lehmann
                         -------------------------------------
                         Thomas G. Lehmann
                         President
Order filed, August 12, 2019

.

In The



## Fourteenth Court of Appeals

____________

NO. 14

- 19

- 00564

- CV

____________

PAUL E NUNU , Appellant

V.

NANCY NUNU RISK AND CHARLES L. NUNU , Appellee

On Appeal from the Probate Court No 2

Harris County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 416781



### ORDER

The reporter’s record in this case was due July 30, 2019

. See Tex. R. App.

P. 35.1. The court has not received a request to extend time for filing the record.

The record has not been filed with the court. Because the rep orter’s record has not

been filed timely, we issue the following order.

We order Donald G. Pylant , the court reporter, to file the record in this

appeal within 15 days of the date of this order

.

PER CURIAM

Panel Consists of Justices Wise, Zimmerer and Spain.
# C_2012152EN.01000301.xml

| 30.5.2012 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 152/3 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

30.5.2012

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 152/3

---

Appointment of the Hearing Officer in trade proceedings

2012/C 152/03

With effect from 1 May 2012, the Commission appointed Mr Dominique AVOT to the post of Hearing Officer, in accordance with Article 3 of the Decision of the President of the European Commission of 29 February 2012 on the function and terms of reference of the hearing officer in certain trade proceedings (OJ L 107, 19.4.2012, p. 5).

---
#### The People of the State of New York ex rel. James S. Calkins, Respondent, v. The Board of Supervisors of the County of Albany, as the Board of Canvassers of the County of Albany, and T. Francis Kennedy, Appellants.

Motions in two cases granted, with ten dollars costs in one case.
§ 408.710 What must your report include? When you make a report, you must tell us— ( a ) The name and social security number of the person to whom the report applies;
( b ) The event you are reporting and the date it happened; and
( c ) Your name if you are not the person to whom the report applies.
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned officer of BakBone Software, Inc. (the Company) hereby certifies, to such officers knowledge, that:

(a) the accompanying quarterly report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the quarterly period ended December 31, 2008 (the Report) fully
complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

(b) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Dated: February 9, 2009

/s/ STEVEN R. MARTINSteven R. Martin Senior Vice President and Chief
Financial Officer (Principal Financial Officer)
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY HIGH

 25,338

 24,569

 27,089

 26,588

 27,457

 25,637

 28,576

 29,266

 30,391

 30,005

 24,358

 27,990

 25,769

 25,003

 25,475

 25,575

 27,137

 28,777

 29,260

 29,737

 27,353

 26,144

 26,392

 24,603

 27,720

 26,520

 24,899

 24,086

 25,963

 25,403

 24,076

 15,559

 15,399

 8,300

 15,882

 11,092

 10,417

 15,571

 13,075

 12,041

 11,346

 9,565

 12,028

 15,624

 15,277

 12,077

 10,288

 16,410

 16,007

 15,636

 12,409

 11,377

 14,648

 12,218

 13,090

 12,674

 13,651

 16,293

 12,445

 13,265

 13,245

 13,176

 19,906

 19,474

 19,210

 19,604

 19,806

 18,649

 21,499

 20,406

 21,877

 19,288

 18,333

 21,950

 20,941

 20,356

 20,094

 19,605

 20,412

 21,205

 21,512

 21,188

 18,265

 21,077

 20,046

 19,389

 21,963

 20,726

 20,429

 19,966

 19,448

 19,407

 19,521

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

AUGUST 2014 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: September 2, 2014

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

PORT CHICAGO TOP IN SUISUN BAY
**FORM 10-Q**

**PACCAR FINANCIAL CORP.**

 

EXHIBIT12.2

 

**COMPUTATIONOF RATIO OF EARNINGS TO FIXED CHARGES**

 

**PURSUANT TOTHE SUPPORT AGREEMENT**

**BETWEEN THECOMPANY AND PACCAR**

#### **(Millions of Dollars)**

 
|                                |   | **Three Months Ended** |     |
|-------------------------------------|--------|------------------------|----------|
|                                |   | **March 31,**          |     |
|                                |   | **2002**               |     | **2001** |   |
|                                |   | **(Unaudited)**        |     |
|                                |   |                   |     |   |   |
| FIXED CHARGES                       |   |                   |     |   |   |
| Interest expense                    |   | **$**                  | **31.8** |   | $ | 50.1 |   |
| Facility and equipment rental       |   | **.4**                 |     | .4 |   |
|                                |   |                   |     |   |   |
| TOTAL FIXED CHARGES                 |   | **$**                  | **32.2** |   | $ | 50.5 |   |
|                                |   |                   |     |   |   |
| EARNINGS                            |   |                   |     |   |   |
| Income before taxes                 |   | **$**                  | **3.6**  |   | $ | 5.4 |   |
| Depreciation                        |   | **3.0**                |     | 3.0 |   |
|                                |   |                   |     |   |   |
|                                |   | **6.6**                |     | 8.4 |   |
| Fixed charges                       |   | **32.2**               |     | 50.5 |   |
|                                |   |                   |     |   |   |
| EARNINGS AS DEFINED                 |   | **$**                  | **38.8** |   | $ | 58.9 |   |
|                                |   |                   |     |   |   |
| RATIO OF EARNINGS TO FIXED  CHARGES |   | **1.21x**              |     | 1.17x |   |
|                                     |        |                        |          |  |  |  |  |  |

 

----
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY HIGH

 12,127

 13,114

 13,157

 13,252

 15,448

 17,299

 17,742

 12,553

 12,411

 13,109

 10,288

 8,963

 7,017

 5,131

 5,375

 5,514

 5,947

 5,739

 9,760

 16,619

 21,191

 21,156

 20,339

 16,618

 14,588

 13,020

 11,862

 11,591

 11,564

 11,768

 11,493

 3,134

 3,319

 3,157

 3,025

 3,307

 4,994

 4,830

 1,656

 1,482

 1,233

 910

 854

 790

 732

 660

 738

 752

 542

 471

 1,451

 3,032

 4,720

 5,029

 2,492

 1,881

 1,824

 1,942

 2,836

 2,684

 2,121

 1,748

 7,652

 7,742

 7,491

 7,424

 8,528

 10,376

 10,636

 7,167

 6,861

 6,518

 5,194

 4,542

 3,206

 2,157

 2,236

 2,203

 2,445

 1,967

 3,445

 7,982

 12,061

 13,095

 12,967

 10,146

 8,690

 7,403

 6,747

 6,878

 6,876

 6,311

 6,186

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

MARCH 2002 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: April 10, 2002

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

PORT CHICAGO BOTTOM IN SUISUN BAY