alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
NO.  07-10-0187-CV

	IN THE COURT OF APPEALS

	FOR THE SEVENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

	AT AMARILLO

	PANEL D

	MAY 18, 2010

	______________________________

	In re DERRICK A. WALKER,

				Relator

	_______________________________

***Opinion on Original Proceeding for Writ of Prohibition***

	_______________________________

Before QUINN, C.J., and CAMPBELL and PIRTLE, JJ.

Pending before the court is the application of Derrick A. Walker for a writ of prohibition barring the State from proceeding to adjudicate his guilt in Cause Nos. 3358 and 3404, 100th Judicial District Court, Hall County, Texas.  The writ is founded upon his belief that the proceeding contravenes the restrictions against double jeopardy.  That is, his having partially paid a “fine” assessed as a condition for deferring the adjudication of his guilt and being placed on community supervision bars the State from proceeding with its motion to adjudicate, the argument goes.  To adjudicate Walker’s guilt and ultimately levy sentence supposedly exposes him to being punished twice for the same offense.  We deny the writ.

	Assuming *arguendo* that Walker complied with all the requirements of Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 52, we note that his argument lacks merit.  Having one’s adjudication of guilt deferred and being placed on community supervision during that period is not tantamount to being sentenced and punished.   *Gardner v. State*, No. 01-01-1226-CR, 2002 Tex. App. LEXIS 7464 *3 (Tex. App.–Houston [1st Dist.] October 17, 2002, no pet.) (not designated for publication); *Tackett v. State*, 989 S.W.2d 855, 858-59 (Tex. App.–Houston [14th Dist.] 1999, pet. ref’d).  Thus, complying with the conditions of his continued probation or community supervision, which includes the payment of a “fine,” does not mean that he has completed or been subjected to some aspect of punishment as contemplated by the Double Jeopardy Clause.  *Gardner v. State, supra.*

**The request for a writ of prohibition is denied.

							Brian Quinn

Chief Justice

2
```

[Congressional Bills 114th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 4080 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

114th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 4080

    To amend title 38, United States Code, to provide for unlimited 
eligibility for health care for mental illnesses for veterans of combat 
         service during certain periods of hostilities and war.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           November 19, 2015

Mr. Cartwright (for himself, Mrs. Napolitano, Mr. Connolly, Ms. Jackson 
 Lee, Ms. Kelly of Illinois, Mr. DeFazio, Mrs. Kirkpatrick, Mr. Jones, 
 Ms. Schakowsky, Ms. Esty, Ms. McCollum, Mr. Grijalva, Mr. Neal, Mrs. 
    Bustos, Mrs. Capps, and Mr. Heck of Washington) introduced the 
   following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Veterans' 
                                Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
    To amend title 38, United States Code, to provide for unlimited 
eligibility for health care for mental illnesses for veterans of combat 
         service during certain periods of hostilities and war.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Veterans Mental Health Accessibility 
Act''.

SEC. 2. UNLIMITED ELIGIBILITY FOR HEALTH CARE FOR MENTAL ILLNESSES FOR 
              VETERANS OF COMBAT SERVICE DURING CERTAIN PERIODS OF 
              HOSTILITIES AND WAR.

    (a) Eligibility.--Section 1710(e)(1) of title 38, United States 
Code, is amended by adding at the end the following new subparagraph:
    ``(G) Notwithstanding paragraphs (2) and (3), a veteran who served 
on active duty in a theater of combat operations (as determined by the 
Secretary in consultation with the Secretary of Defense) during World 
War II, the Korean conflict, the Vietnam Era, the Persian Gulf War, 
Operation Iraqi Freedom, Operation Enduring Freedom, or any other 
period of war after the Persian Gulf War, or in combat against a 
hostile force during a period of hostilities (as defined in section 
1712A(a)(2)(B) of this title), is eligible for hospital care, medical 
services, and nursing home care under subsection (a)(2)(F) for any 
mental illness, notwithstanding that there is insufficient medical 
evidence to conclude that such illness is attributable to such 
service.''.
    (b) Effective Date.--Subparagraph (G) of section 1710(e)(1) of 
title 38, United States Code, as added by subsection (a), shall apply 
with respect to hospital care, medical services, and nursing home care 
provided on or after the date of the enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
§ 404.1251 Final reports—for wages paid prior to 1987. If a political subdivision is legally dissolved, the State shall file a final report on that entity. The report shall include each coverage group whose existence ceases with that of the entity. It shall: ( a ) Be marked “final report”;
( b ) Cover the period during which final payment of wages subject to the agreement is made; and
( c ) Indicate the last date wages were paid.
With the final report, the State shall submit a statement showing the title and business address of the State official responsible for keeping the State's records and of each State and local official responsible for keeping the records for each coverage group whose existence is ended. The State shall also identify, as prescribed by SSA, each political subdivision by its assigned number and, where applicable, any coverage group or payroll record unit number assigned. (Approved by the Office of Management and Budget under control number 0960-0425) [53 FR 32976, Aug. 29, 1988, as amended at 66 FR 28836, May 25, 2001]
#### Mary M. Woodworth, Respondent, v. John J. McGuire, Appellant.

Judgment and order reversed and new trial granted, with costs to appellant to abide event. Held, 1. That there was not sufficient evidence to justify a finding by the jury that the defendant acknowledged an indebtedness to the plaintiff and promised in writing to pay the same. 2. That under the proof and circumstances of the case the defendant was entitled to have the jury instructed, as requested, that if the jury “find that the $25 check was not a payment upon this indebtedness, the plaintiff cannot recover,” and that the exception taken to the refusal of the court to so charge presents a reversible error. AH concurred.
### §2595d. Annual report on comprehensive nuclear-test-ban treaty sensors

#### (a) Requirement

Not later than 90 days after December 27, 2021, and not later than September 1 of each subsequent year, the Secretary of State shall submit to the appropriate congressional committees a report on the sensors used in the international monitoring system of the Comprehensive Nuclear-Test-Ban Treaty Organization. Each such report shall include, with respect to the period covered by the report—

(1) the number of incidents where such sensors are disabled, turned off, or experience "technical difficulties"; and

(2) with respect to each such incident—

(A) the location of the sensor;

(B) the duration of the incident; and

(C) whether the Secretary determines there is reason to believe that the incident was a deliberate act on the part of the host nation.

#### (b) Appropriate congressional committees defined

In this section, the term "appropriate congressional committees" means—

(1) the Committee on Foreign Affairs and the Committee on Armed Services of the House of Representatives; and

(2) the Committee on Foreign Relations and the Committee on Armed Services of the Senate.

(Pub. L. 117–81, div. A, title XIII, §1335, Dec. 27, 2021, 135 Stat. 2011.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section was enacted as part of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2022, and not as part of the Arms Control and Disarmament Act which comprises this chapter.
**EXHIBIT 31.1****CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER**I, Richard R. Woolcott, certify that:     1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of Volcom, Inc.;     2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material factor omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of thecircumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this report;     3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information includedin this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results ofoperations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;     4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules
CERTIFICATIONS



I, James Mackay, certify that:



1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of Sure Trace Security Corp.;



2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly report;



3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report;



4. The registrant's other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and we have:



a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this quarterly report is being prepared;



b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of this quarterly report (the "Evaluation Date"); and



c) presented in this quarterly report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures based on our evaluation as of the Evaluation Date;



5. The registrant's other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):



a) all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal controls which could adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial data and have identified for the registrant's auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and



b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal controls; and







Date: August 14, 2004

/s/ James Mackay

James Mackay

Chairman and Director, Principal Accounting Officer
<PAGE>
EXHIBIT 3(i)(b)

                          CERTIFICATE OF CORRECTION

                                       OF

           CERTIFICATE OF THE VOTING POWERS, DESIGNATIONS, PREFERENCES
                 AND RELATIVE, PARTICIPATING, OPTIONAL OR OTHER
               SPECIAL RIGHTS, AND QUALIFICATIONS, LIMITATIONS OR
                  RESTRICTIONS THEREOF, OF SERIES D CONVERTIBLE
                                 PREFERRED STOCK

                                       OF

                                 U S WEST, INC.


                              ---------------------


            Pursuant to Section 103(f) of the General Corporation Law
                            of the State of Delaware

                              ---------------------


            U S WEST, INC., a corporation organized and existing by virtue of
the General Corporation Law of the State of Delaware (the "Corporation"), does
hereby certify as follows:

            FIRST: On November 14, 1996, the Corporation filed with the Office
of the Secretary of State of the State of Delaware a Certificate of the Voting
Powers, Designations, Preferences and Relative, Participating, Optional or
Special Rights, and Qualifications, Limitations or Restrictions Thereof, of
Series D Convertible Preferred Stock (the "Certificate of Designations") with
respect to the designation of 20,000,000 shares of preferred stock, par value
$1.00 per share, of the Corporation as the Series D Convertible Preferred Stock
(the "Series D Stock") of the Corporation.

            SECOND: The annual rate of dividend on each share of Series D Stock,
and the calculation of the quarterly and annual per share payments to be made
thereon, in the second sentence of Section 2.1 of the Certificate of
Designations was inadvertently omitted. That sentence is hereby corrected to
read in its entirety as follows:



<PAGE>

            "Each dividend shall be at the annual rate equal to 4.500% per share
            of Series D Stock (which is equivalent to $0.56 quarterly and $2.25
            annually per share)."

            THIRD: The foregoing correction was prepared in accordance with
Section 103(f) of the General Corporation Law of the State of Delaware.

            IN WITNESS WHEREOF, U S WEST has caused this Certificate of
Correction to be signed this 10th day of December, 1996.



                                    U S WEST, INC.


                                    By:  /s/ Stephen E. Brilz
                                       ----------------------------------
                                       Name:  Stephen E. Brilz
                                       Title: Assistant Secretary and
                                                Corporate Counsel





                                     2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY HIGH

 374

 282

 266

 301

 219

 237

 434

 609

 753

 993

 1,130

 1,177

 1,143

 778

 505

 333

 276

 188

 259

 337

 456

 476

 510

 426

 420

 423

 462

 508

 452

 375

 303

 153

 151

 147

 158

 154

 147

 150

 156

 152

 163

 152

 164

 159

 164

 165

 163

 168

 168

 161

 161

 168

 162

 154

 162

 157

 159

 148

 158

 158

 157

 153

 214

 190

 173

 175

 168

 168

 186

 217

 241

 290

 310

 356

 341

 258

 222

 203

 190

 173

 180

 192

 209

 207

 204

 206

 206

 208

 226

 234

 222

 211

 191

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

DECEMBER 2000 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: January 16, 2001

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

RIO VISTA ON THE SACRAMENTO RIVER
### §257. Arrest of seamen; procedure generally

In all cases within the purview of section 256 of this title the consul general, consul, or other consular or commercial authority of such foreign nation charged with the appropriate duty in the particular case, may make application to any court of record of the United States, or to any judge thereof, or to any United States magistrate judge, setting forth that such controversy, difficulty, or disorder has arisen, briefly stating the nature thereof, and when and where the same occurred, and exhibiting a certified copy or extract of the shipping articles, roll, or other proper paper of the vessel, to the effect that the person in question is of the crew or ship's company of such vessel; and further stating and certifying that such person has withdrawn himself, or is believed to be about to withdraw himself, from the control and discipline of the master and officers of the vessel or that he has refused, or is about to refuse, to submit to and obey the lawful jurisdiction of such consular or commercial authority in the premises; and further stating and certifying that, to the best of the knowledge and belief of the officer certifying, such person is not a citizen of the United States. Such application shall be in writing and duly authenticated by the consular or other sufficient official seal. Thereupon such court, judge, or magistrate judge shall issue his warrant for the arrest of the person so complained of, directed to the marshal of the United States for the appropriate district, or in his discretion to any person, being a citizen of the United States, whom he may specially depute for the purpose, requiring such person to be brought before him for examination at a certain time and place.

(R.S. §4080; May 28, 1896, ch. 252, §19, 29 Stat. 184; Mar. 2, 1901, ch. 814, 31 Stat. 956; Pub. L. 90–578, title IV, §402(b)(2), Oct. 17, 1968, 82 Stat. 1118; Pub. L. 101–650, title III, §321, Dec. 1, 1990, 104 Stat. 5117.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

R.S. §4080 derived from act June 11, 1864, ch. 116, §2, 13 Stat. 121.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Change of Name

Act May 28, 1896, abolished the circuit court and required the district court to appoint persons to be known as United States commissioners.

"United States magistrate judge" and "magistrate judge" substituted in text for "United States magistrate" and "magistrate", respectively, pursuant to section 321 of Pub. L. 101–650, set out as a note under section 631 of Title 28, Judiciary and Judicial Procedure. Previously, "magistrate" substituted for "commissioner" pursuant to Pub. L. 90–578. See chapter 43 (§631 et seq.) of Title 28.

#### Acts Applicable to Commissioners of Circuit Court Also Applicable to United States Commissioners

Act Mar. 2, 1901, provided in part that all acts or parts of acts applicable to commissioners of the circuit court, except as to appointment and fees, shall be applicable to United States commissioners.
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 99.1

                Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
      as Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Transcontinental Realty Investors,
Inc. (the "Company"), on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2003, as filed
with Securities Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Ronald
E. Kimbrough, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer, Principal
Financial and Accounting Officer and Acting Principal Executive Officer of the
Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

1.   The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d)
     of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2.   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
     respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.

Date:     May 20, 2003                         /s/ Ronald E. Kimbrough
     -----------------------                -----------------------------------
                                            Ronald E. Kimbrough
                                            Executive Vice President
                                            and Chief Financial Officer
                                            (Principal Financial and
                                             Accounting Officer and
                                             Acting Principal Executive Officer)

                                       28
### §262n–1. Increase in income and employment in developing countries; enhancement of purchasing power; diversification away from single crop or product economies

The Secretary of the Treasury, after consultations with the Secretary of Agriculture and the Secretary of the Interior (to the extent appropriate) on markets and prices for commodities, shall periodically instruct the United States Executive Director of each multilateral development bank to work with other executive directors of the respective bank to continue to—

(1) support activities which result in broad increases in income and employment and enhance purchasing power in developing countries, particularly among the rural poor; and

(2) encourage diversification away from single crop or product economies in developing countries to help reduce wide fluctuations in commodity prices and the adverse impact of abrupt changes in the terms of trade.

(Pub. L. 95–118, title XIV, §1402, as added Pub. L. 100–202, §101(e) [title I], Dec. 22, 1987, 101 Stat. 1329–131, 1329–134.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section 1402 of Pub. L. 95–118 is based on section 701 of title VII of H.R. 3750, One Hundredth Congress, as introduced Dec. 11, 1987, and enacted into law by Pub. L. 100–202.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Definitions

The definitions in section 262p–5 of this title apply to this section.
Management Themes Applied to Idaho Roadless Areas

Wild Land Recreation

Primitive

Backcountry/Restoration

General Forest , Rangeland and Grassland

Special Areas of Historic or Tribal Significance

Forest Plan Special Areas

Wilderness

National Forest System Lands

(Other ownership is not displayed)

Frank Church-River of No Return Wilderness

Sawtooth Wilderness

Borah Peak

Red Mountain

Lemhi Range

King Mountain

Camas Creek

Loon Creek

Diamond Peak

Seafoam

Pioneer Mountains

Prophyry

Boulder - White Clouds

Pahsimeroi Mountain

Squaw Creek

White Knob

Cha Red Hill llis Creek

Greylock

Taylor Mountain

Hanson Lakes

Copper Basin Jumpoff Mountain

Grouse Peak

Cold Springs

Wood Canyon

Warm Creek

Railroad Ridge

Blue Bunch

Spring Basin

£¤93

£¤20

£¤26

¬«28

¬«75

¬«21

¬«46

¬«22

¬«23

May

Arco

Pine

Moore

Lemhi

Ellis

Carey

Baker

Shoup

Grouse

Leslie

Mackay

Chilly

Picabo

Hailey

Corral

Cobalt

Salmon

Carmen

Gilmore

Leadore

Ketchum

Atlanta

Clayton

Stanley

Sunbeam

Challis

Gannett

Berenice

Bellevue

Patterson

Richfield

Hill City

Fairfield

Big Creek

Butte City

Lost River

Darlington

Sun Valley

North Fork

Featherville

Challis Idaho Roadless Rule Management Themes

10 5 0 10 I Miles

The USDA Forest Service uses the most current and complete

data available. GIS Data and product accuracy may vary.

Using GIS products for puposes other than those for which they

were intended may yield inaccurate or misleading results.

The USDA Forest Service reserves the right to correct, update,

modify, or replace GIS products without notification.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY HIGH

 105

 162

 166

 155

 149

 157

 151

 158

 164

 179

 175

 176

 173

 168

 164

 168

 168

 173

 173

 168

 173

 170

 170

 170

 170

 170

 171

 172

 168

 169

 170

 102

 104

 105

 112

 113

 113

 113

 114

 116

 112

 114

 119

 117

 114

 118

 120

 127

 131

 132

 138

 134

 131

 138

 138

 133

 140

 145

 145

 143

 144

 145

 103

 117

 125

 133

 133

 132

 128

 134

 136

 138

 137

 140

 139

 141

 141

 147

 145

 151

 155

 154

 152

 156

 158

 158

 156

 157

 163

 162

 159

 160

 161

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

MARCH 2000 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: April 11, 2000

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

SAN ANDREAS ON THE SAN JOAQUIN RIVER