alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Editorial Note on Part 416
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 416 appear at 68 FR 53509, Sept. 11, 2003.

§ 416.1615 How to prove you are lawfully admitted for permanent residence in the United States. ( a ) *What you should give us.* You can prove that you are lawfully admitted for permanent residence in the United States by giving us— ( 1 ) An Alien Registration Receipt Card issued by the Immigration and Naturalization Service (INS) in accordance with that Agency's current regulations;
( 2 ) A reentry permit;
( 3 ) An alien identification card issued by the government of the Northern Mariana Islands showing that you are admitted to the Northern Mariana Islands for permanent residence; or
( 4 ) INS Form I-688 which shows that you have been granted lawful temporary resident status under section 210 or section 210A of the Immigration and Nationality Act.
( b ) *What to do if you cannot give us the information listed in paragraph (a).* If you cannot give us any of the documents listed in paragraph (a), we may find you to be lawfully admitted for permanent residence in the United States if you— ( 1 ) Explain why you cannot give us any of the documents; and
( 2 ) Give us any information you have which shows or results in proof that you are lawfully admitted for permanent residence in the United States.
( c ) *What “United States” means.* We use the term *United States* in this section to mean the 50 States, the District of Columbia, and the Northern Mariana Islands.
(Approved by the Office of Management and Budget under control number 0960-0451) [47 FR 3106, Jan. 22, 1982, as amended at 52 FR 21943, June 10, 1987; 56 FR 55075, Oct. 24, 1991; 61 FR 56134, Oct. 31, 1996]
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

DAY HIGH

 23,000

 22,130

 23,212

 21,984

 20,810

 23,950

 22,209

 24,629

 23,566

 23,329

 22,061

 22,717

 22,208

 21,683

 22,029

 21,009

 21,453

 21,657

 20,453

 21,108

 22,555

 20,670

 21,135

 19,303

 21,264

 21,847

 21,810

 21,858

 22,057

 22,093

 10,821

 10,416

 8,869

 14,056

 13,447

 13,072

 12,920

 12,388

 11,652

 11,576

 12,475

 12,580

 12,266

 12,384

 11,105

 11,581

 11,806

 12,240

 6,662

 10,676

 9,817

 9,973

 10,719

 10,995

 10,993

 11,326

 12,516

 12,280

 12,023

 12,086

 17,696

 16,891

 14,077

 17,916

 17,341

 17,314

 17,503

 17,962

 17,270

 16,757

 17,297

 17,676

 17,200

 17,367

 17,099

 16,616

 17,131

 17,067

 14,623

 15,608

 15,286

 15,508

 15,977

 16,019

 16,479

 16,838

 17,134

 17,596

 16,799

 16,256

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

SEPTEMBER 2012 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: November 15, 2012

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

PORT CHICAGO TOP IN SUISUN BAY
**KPMG
      LLP**


700
      Louisiana Street


Houston,TX 
      77002







Independent
      Accountants' Report






The
      Partners


GEMSA
      Loan Services, L.P.




We
      have
      examined management's assertion, included in the accompanying Management
      Assertion, that GEMSA
      Loan Services, L.P. (the Partnership) complied with the minimum servicing
      standards set forth in the Mortgage Bankers Association of America's (MBA) *Uniform
      Single Attestation Program for Mortgage* *Bankers,* except
      for minimum servicing standards V.4. and VI.1 ., which
      the MBA has interpreted as being inapplicable
      to the servicing
      of commercial and multi-family loans as of and for the year ended December
      31, 2005. Management is responsible for the Partnership's compliance with those
      minimum servicing standards. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on
      management's assertion about the Partnership's
      compliance based on our examination.




Our
      examination was conducted in accordance with attestation standards established
      by the American Institute
      of Certified Public Accountants and, accordingly, included examining, on a
      test
      basis, evidence about
      the
      Partnership's compliance with the minimum servicing standards specified above
      and performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the
      circumstances. We believe that our examination provides a reasonable basis
      for
      our opinion. Our examination does not provide a legal determination on the
      Partnership's compliance with the minimum servicing standards.




In
      our
      opinion, management's assertion that GEMSA Loan Services, L.P. complied with
      the aforementioned
      minimum servicing standards as of and for the year ended December
      31, 2005is fairly stated,
      in all material respects.




/s/
      KPMG
      LLP




February
      27, 2006






KPMG
      LLP,
      a U.S. limited liability partnership, is the U.S.


member
      of
      KPMG International, a Swiss cooperative
§ 408.1045 What procedures apply if you request an ALJ hearing? ( a ) *General rules.* For purposes of this part, we use the same rules on ALJ hearing procedures that we use in the title XVI program (see §§ 416.1444-416.1461 of this chapter), except as noted in paragraph (b) of this section.
( b ) *Exceptions.* ( 1 ) In § 416.1446(b)(1), the last sentence does not apply under this part.
( 2 ) In § 416.1452(a)(1)(i), the words “supplemental security income” are deemed to read “SVB.”
( 3 ) In § 416.1457, the provisions of paragraph (c)(4) do not apply under this part.
§ 408.1004 Which administrative actions are not initial determinations? Administrative actions that are not initial determinations may be reviewed by us, but they are not subject to the administrative review process provided by this subpart and they are not subject to judicial review. These actions include, but are not limited to, an action about— ( a ) Denial of a request to be made your representative payee;
( b ) Denial of your request to use the expedited appeals process;
( c ) Denial of your request to reopen a determination or a decision;
( d ) Disqualifying or suspending a person from acting as your representative in a proceeding before us;
( e ) Denial of your request to extend the time period for requesting review of a determination or a decision;
( f ) Denial of your request to readjudicate your claim and apply an Acquiescence Ruling;
( g ) Declining under § 408.351(f) to make a determination on a claim for benefits based on alleged misinformation because one or more of the conditions specified in § 408.351(f) are not met;
( h ) Findings on whether we can collect an overpayment by using the Federal income tax refund offset procedure. (See § 408.943).
( i ) The determination to reduce, suspend, or terminate your federally administered State recognition payments due to a State-initiated mass change, as defined in § 408.1001, in the levels of such payments, except as provided in § 408.1003(h).
Second Department,

March, 1948.

(March 1, 1948.)

#### Nadwor Equities Co., Appellant, v. Joseph Wexner, Respondent.

Motion for leave to appeal to the Appellate Division denied, with $10 costs. Present — Lewis, P. J., Carswell, Johnston, Adel and Wenzel, JJ.
### SUBCHAPTER III—CONFIDENTIALITY OF INFORMATION
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM UNAUDITED
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS FOR THE THREE MONTHS ENDED MARCH 31, 1999 AND
IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1999
<CASH>                                          11,900
<SECURITIES>                                   253,834
<RECEIVABLES>                                   26,166
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                15,415
<PP&E>                                          42,942
<DEPRECIATION>                                   9,537
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 340,720
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           47,816
<BONDS>                                        124,990
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                      5,452
<COMMON>                                        24,710
<OTHER-SE>                                     137,752
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   340,720
<SALES>                                          1,844
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                15,701
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    2,278
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 2,448
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               2,052
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  8,923
<INCOME-TAX>                                     3,371
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              5,552
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     5,552
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .23
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .20
        

</TABLE>
§ 30.318 How will FAB consider objections to NIOSH's reconstruction of a radiation dose, or to OWCP's calculation of the recommended probability of causation, in a Part B claim for radiogenic cancer? ( a ) If the claimant objects to NIOSH's reconstruction of the radiation dose to which the employee was exposed, either in writing or at the oral hearing, the FAB reviewer has the discretion to consult with NIOSH as part of his or her consideration of any objection. However, the HHS dose reconstruction regulation, which provides guidance for the technical methods developed and used by NIOSH to provide a reasonable estimate of the radiation dose received by an employee, is binding on FAB. Should this consultation take place, the FAB reviewer will properly document it in the case. Whether or not NIOSH is consulted, and as provided for in § 30.317, the FAB reviewer may decide to return the case to the district office for referral to NIOSH for such further action as may be appropriate.
( b ) If the claimant objects to OWCP's calculation of the recommended probability of causation in a Part B radiogenic cancer claim, the FAB reviewer has the discretion to consider if OWCP used incorrect factual information when it performed this calculation. However, the statute requires that OWCP use a particular methodology, established by regulations issued by HHS at 42 CFR part 81, when it calculates the recommended probability of causation.
[84 FR 3051, Feb. 8, 2019]
#### Ruth Storch et al., Respondents, v. High Grade Land Corp., Appellant.

In an action to recover damages for personal injuries and loss of services, order granting plaintiffs’ motion for leave to serve and file a demand for a jury trial *mme pro*tunc, affirmed, with $10 costs and disbursements. No opinion. Lewis, P. J., Johnston, Adel, Sneed and Wenzel, JJ., concur.
### SUBCHAPTER VI—PERSONNEL ADMINISTRATION
```

[Congressional Bills 114th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 4111 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

114th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 4111

To include skilled nursing facilities as a type of health care provider 
        under section 254(h) of the Communications Act of 1934.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           November 19, 2015

 Mr. Lance (for himself, Mr. Cramer, and Mr. Loebsack) introduced the 
   following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Energy and 
                                Commerce

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To include skilled nursing facilities as a type of health care provider 
        under section 254(h) of the Communications Act of 1934.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Rural Health Care Connectivity Act 
of 2015''.

SEC. 2. TELECOMMUNICATIONS SERVICES FOR SKILLED NURSING FACILITIES.

    (a) In General.--Section 254(h)(7)(B) of the Communications Act of 
1934 (47 U.S.C. 254(h)(7)(B)) is amended--
            (1) in clause (vi), by striking ``and'' at the end;
            (2) by redesignating clause (vii) as clause (viii);
            (3) by inserting after clause (vi) the following:
                            ``(vii) skilled nursing facilities;''; and
            (4) in clause (viii), as redesignated, by striking 
        ``clauses (i) through (vi)'' and inserting ``clauses (i) 
        through (vii)''.
    (b) Savings Clause.--Nothing in subsection (a) shall be construed 
to affect the aggregate annual cap on Federal universal service support 
for health care providers under section 54.675 of title 47, Code of 
Federal Regulations, or any successor regulation.
                                 <all>
```
§ 404.1700 Introduction. You may appoint someone to represent you in any of your dealings with us. This subpart explains, among other things— ( a ) Who may be your representative and what his or her qualifications must be;
( b ) How you appoint a representative;
( c ) The payment of fees to a representative;
( d ) Our rules that representatives must follow; and
( e ) What happens to a representative who breaks the rules.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY HIGH

 304

 308

 313

 315

 318

 314

 309

 305

 303

 294

 287

 284

 281

 285

 284

 289

 287

 289

 292

 313

 321

 286

 286

 307

 284

 299

 303

 329

 344

 388

 424

 267

 269

 272

 277

 282

 284

 283

 282

 279

 271

 269

 266

 267

 268

 267

 267

 267

 267

 267

 268

 267

 267

 267

 265

 263

 263

 261

 261

 259

 258

 257

 280

 279

 283

 289

 292

 292

 289

 288

 286

 280

 275

 273

 272

 273

 272

 272

 272

 273

 274

 277

 277

 272

 273

 273

 270

 270

 271

 274

 274

 280

 286

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

JANUARY 2015 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: February 2, 2015

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

RIO VISTA ON THE SACRAMENTO RIVER
#### § 408.208 What happens if you establish residence outside the United States within 4 calendar months?

If you begin residing outside the United States within 4 calendar months after the month in which your SVB qualification notice is dated, we will send you a letter telling you that you are entitled to SVB and the first month for which SVB payments can be made to you. The letter will also tell you the amount of your monthly benefit payments, whether your payments are reduced because of your other benefit income, and what rights you have to a reconsideration of our determination.
Order entered January 16, 2013

In The

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-12-00520-CR

HENRY ARNOLD, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the County Criminal Court No. 1

Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. MB09-31021

ORDER

On November 14, 2012, the Court ordered the parties to file a written stipulation stating 

either: (1) the portion, if any, of the audio recording could be retrieved; and (2) whether the 

parties can agree to the content of that transcription; or (3) that no portion of the audio recording 

can be retrieved. On December 13, 2012, we received a supplemental clerk’s record containing 

the parties’ stipulation that they “can reach no agreement regarding what the substantive and 

accurate contents of any substituted Reporter’s Record would or would not show.”

We ORDER appellant to file his brief within THIRTY DAYS of the date of this order.

/s/ DAVID W. EVANS

JUSTICE
#### § 1002.119 To whom must the employee submit the application for reemployment?

The application must be submitted to the pre-service employer or to an agent or representative of the employer who has apparent responsibility for receiving employment applications. Depending upon the circumstances, such a person could be a personnel or human resources officer, or a first-line supervisor. If there has been a change in ownership of the employer, the application should be submitted to the employer's successor-in-interest.
Exhibit 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                           18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS
                         ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906
                        OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss.1350, as adopted pursuant to ss.906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned officer of John Hancock Financial
Services, Inc. (the "Company"), hereby certifies, to his knowledge, that: (1)
the Company's quarterly report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30,
2003, (the "Report") fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and (2) the information contained in the
Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and
results of operations of the Company as of and for the periods presented in the
Report.

Dated: May 6, 2004

                                 /s/ DAVID F. D'ALESSANDRO
                                 -------------------------
                                 Name: David F. D'Alessandro
                                 Title: Chairman and Chief Executive Officer


      A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has
been provided to John Hancock Financial Services, Inc. and will be retained by
John Hancock Financial Services, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and
Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

      It is intended that this Exhibit be treated as, and deemed to be,
"accompanying" this quarterly report on Form 10-Q, and not "filed" as part of
the report.
Exhibit 99.4 - Administrative Report of the Trust

                              Administrative Report
                                       for
            Hartford Life Global Funding Trust 2005-057 (the "Trust")


                           Payment Date June 15, 2005
                             CUSIP Number 41659FCZ5


(i)   the amount received by the Indenture Trustee from Hartford Life Insurance
      Company ("Hartford Life") as of the payment date in respect of the
      principal, interest and premium, if any, on Funding Agreement No. 405057
      (the "Funding Agreement") issued by Hartford Life Insurance Company
      ("Hartford Life").

              Interest:                $ 12,394.67
              Principal:               $ 0.00

(ii)  the amount of payment on such Payment Date to holders allocable to
      principal and interest on the notes of the Trust.

              Interest:                $ 12,394.67
              Principal:               $ 0.00

(iii) the aggregate stated principal amount of the Funding Agreement, the
      current interest rate or rates thereon at the close of business on such
      Payment Date, and the current rating assigned to the Funding Agreement.

              Aggregate Principal Amount:           $ 2,688,015.00
              Interest Rate:                        4.51%

                                  Ratings:

                                        Moody's Investor Services: Aa3
                                        Standard & Poors' Rating Service: AA-

(iv)  the aggregate principal balance of the notes of the Trust at the close of
      business on such Payment Date and the current rating assigned to such
      notes.

                                  Aggregate Principal Amount: $ 2,688,000.00

                                  Ratings:

                                        Moody's Investor Services: Aa3
                                        Standard & Poors' Rating Service: AA-

AMACAR Pacific Corp., as administrator of Hartford Life Global Funding Trust
2005-057


By:   /s/  Evelyn Echevarria
      -------------------------
      Name:  Evelyn Echevarria
      Title:  Vice President


                                       1
#### § 404.325 The termination month.

If you do not have a disabling impairment, your termination month is the third month following the month in which your impairment is not disabling even if it occurs during the trial work period or the reentitlement period. If you continue to have a disabling impairment and complete 9 months of trial work, your termination month will be the third month following the earliest month you perform substantial gainful activity or are determined able to perform substantial gainful activity; however, in no event will the termination month under these circumstances be earlier than the first month after the end of the reentitlement period described in § 404.1592a.

# Example 1:

You complete your trial work period in December 1999. You then work at the substantial gainful activity level and continue to do so throughout the 36 months following completion of your trial work period and thereafter. Your termination month will be January 2003, which is the first month in which you performed substantial gainful activity after the end of your 36-month reentitlement period. This is because, for individuals who have disabling impairments (see § 404.1511) and who work, the termination month cannot occur before the first month after the end of the 36-month reentitlement period.

# Example 2:

You complete your trial work period in December 1999, but you do not do work showing your ability to do substantial gainful activity during your trial work period or throughout your 36-month reentitlement period. In April 2003, 4 months after your reentitlement period ends, you become employed at work that we determine is substantial gainful activity, considering all of our rules in §§ 404.1574 and 404.1574a. Your termination month will be July 2003; that is, the third month after the earliest month you performed substantial gainful activity.

[65 FR 42782, July 11, 2000]
(No. 6577

#### L. E. Mandernack, M.D., Claimant, *vs.*State of Illinois, Department of Mental Health, Respondent.

*Opinion filed July 14, 1972.*

Dr. L. E. Mandernack, Claimant, pro se.

William J. Scott, Attorney General; Saul R. Wexler, Assistant Attorney General, for Respondent.

*11Perlin, C.J.
FIRST DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

STATE OF FLORIDA

_____________________________

No. 1D2023-0904 

_____________________________

FLORIDA EVERBLADES, LLC and

TRI-STATE INSURANCE COMPANY 

OF MINNESOTA,

Appellants,

v.

MITCH VANDERGUNST,

Appellee.

_____________________________

On appeal from the Office of the Judges of Compensation Claims.

Jack Weiss, Judge.

Date of Accident: February 15, 2019.

February 21, 2024

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.

OSTERHAUS, C.J., and ROBERTS and M.K. THOMAS, JJ., concur.
2

_____________________________

Not final until disposition of any timely and 

authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 

9.331.

_____________________________

Richard W. Ervin, IV and Robert W. Bleakley of Bleakley Bavol 

Denman & Grace, Tampa, for Appellants.

Michael J. Winer of Winer Law Group, Tampa, for Appellee.