alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, 
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

The undersigned, Michael Eyre, the Chief Executive Officer of CellCyte Genetics Corporation, and Glen Macdonald, the Chief Financial Officer of CellCyte Genetics Corporation, each hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to his knowledge, the Annual Report on Form 10-KSB of CellCyte Genetics Corporation, for the year ended December 31, 2006, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and that the information contained in the Annual Report on Form 10-KSB fairly presents in all material respects the financial condition and results of operations of CellCyte Genetics Corporation.

Date:  March 26, 2007.

| | /s/ Michael Eyre
__________________________________  
| | -----------------------------------------------------
| | Michael Eyre
Chief Executive Officer                 
| | /s/ Glen Macdonald
__________________________________
| | Glen Macdonald
Chief Financial Officer               

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signatures that appear in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to CellCyte Genetics Corporation and will be retained by CellCyte Genetics Corporation and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

__________
### Part C—United States Financial Participation
#### Helen Hastings, Respondent, v. New York State Railways, Appellant.

Judgment and order affirmed, with costs. All concurred.
114TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 4096 

AN ACT 

To amend the Volcker Rule to permit certain investment 

advisers to share a similar name with a private equity 

fund, subject to certain restrictions, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 
2 

•HR 4096 EH

1 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

2 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Investor Clarity and 

3 Bank Parity Act’’. 

4 SEC. 2. NAMING RESTRICTIONS. 

5 Section 13 of the Bank Holding Company Act of 

6 1956 (12 U.S.C. 1851) is amended— 

7 (1) in subsection (d)(1)(G)(vi), by inserting be8 fore the semicolon the following: ‘‘, except that the 

9 hedge fund or private equity fund may share the 

10 same name or a variation of the same name as a 

11 banking entity that is an investment adviser to the 

12 hedge fund or private equity find, if— 

13 ‘‘(I) such investment adviser is 

14 not an insured depository institution, 

15 a company that controls an insured 

16 depository institution, or a company 

17 that is treated as a bank holding com18 pany for purposes of section 8 of the 

19 International Banking Act of 1978; 

20 ‘‘(II) such investment adviser 

21 does not share the same name or a 

22 variation of the same name as an in23 sured depository institution, any com24 pany that controls an insured deposi25 tory institution, or any company that 

26 is treated as a bank holding company 
3 

•HR 4096 EH

1 for purposes of section 8 of the Inter2 national Banking Act of 1978; and 

3 ‘‘(III) such name does not con4 tain the word ‘bank’ ’’; and 

5 (2) in subsection (h)(5)(C), by inserting before 

6 the period the following: ‘‘, except as permitted 

7 under subsection (d)(1)(G)(vi)’’. 

Passed the House of Representatives April 26, 2016. 

Attest: 

Clerk. 
114TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 4096 

AN ACT 

To amend the Volcker Rule to permit certain intions, and for other purposes. a private equity fund, subject to certain restric- vestment advisers to share a similar name with
**FORM 10-Q**

**PACCAR FINANCIAL CORP.**

 

EXHIBIT12.1

 

### **COMPUTATIONOF RATIO OF EARNINGS TO FIXED CHARGES**

 

### **PURSUANTTO SEC REPORTING REQUIREMENTS**

**(Millions of Dollars)**

 
|                                |   | **Three Months Ended** |     |
|-------------------------------------|--------|------------------------|----------|
|                                |   | **March 31,**          |     |
|                                |   | **2002**               |     | **2001** |   |
|                                |   | **(Unaudited)**        |     |
|                                |   |                   |     |   |   |
| FIXED CHARGES                       |   |                   |     |   |   |
| Interest expense                    |   | **$**                  | **31.8** |   | $ | 50.1 |   |
| Portion of rentals deemed  interest |   | **.3**                 |     | .3 |   |
|                                |   |                   |     |   |   |
| TOTAL FIXED CHARGES                 |   | **$**                  | **32.1** |   | $ | 50.4 |   |
|                                |   |                   |     |   |   |
| EARNINGS                            |   |                   |     |   |   |
| Income before taxes                 |   | **$**                  | **3.6**  |   | $ | 4.7 |   |
| Fixed charges                       |   | **32.1**               |     | 50.4 |   |
|                                |   |                   |     |   |   |
| EARNINGS AS DEFINED                 |   | **$**                  | **35.7** |   | $ | 55.1 |   |
|                                |   |                   |     |   |   |
| RATIO OF EARNINGS TO FIXED  CHARGES |   | **1.11x**              |     | 1.09x |   |

 

 

The method of computing the ratio of earnings tofixed charges shown above complies with SEC reporting requirements but differsfrom the method called for in the Support Agreement between the Company andPACCAR.  See Exhibit 12.2.  Income before taxes for the three monthsended March 31, 2001 has been adjusted to exclude $.7 pretax income from the cumulativeeffect of the accounting change related toFAS 133.

 

----
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY HIGH

 69

 79

 78

 77

 75

 74

 75

 75

 82

 85

 85

 87

 87

 86

 84

 84

 85

 81

 80

 82

 84

 78

 76

 76

 79

 80

 78

 79

 76

 77

 78

 61

 71

 76

 74

 72

 71

 72

 71

 74

 79

 80

 81

 82

 81

 80

 81

 78

 74

 75

 77

 73

 71

 72

 72

 74

 75

 73

 74

 72

 73

 72

 63

 76

 77

 75

 74

 73

 73

 73

 79

 82

 82

 84

 84

 83

 83

 82

 81

 77

 77

 79

 78

 74

 74

 74

 76

 77

 75

 76

 74

 75

 75

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

JULY 2003 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: August 7, 2003

HIGH LOW MEAN

 66.6

 69.1

 70.0

 70.6

 71.0

 70.9

 70.4

 70.5

 72.6

 74.4

 74.9

 76.2

 76.2

 76.9

 77.4

 77.1

 77.4

 77.5

 77.3

 78.1

 77.5

 77.0

 75.4

 74.9

 75.4

 76.6

 77.4

 77.2

 76.7

 76.7

 74.8

 62.4

 64.7

 65.7

 66.2

 66.9

 66.9

 66.7

 65.8

 67.1

 69.6

 69.8

 70.7

 71.0

 71.3

 72.6

 71.8

 72.3

 72.8

 73.4

 73.5

 73.5

 73.0

 72.4

 70.8

 70.8

 71.4

 72.3

 72.6

 72.1

 73.1

 72.3

 64.4

 66.7

 67.8

 68.4

 68.9

 69.0

 68.6

 68.2

 69.8

 71.8

 72.3

 73.3

 73.6

 74.1

 74.9

 74.5

 74.9

 75.2

 75.5

 75.8

 75.6

 75.1

 73.6

 72.6

 73.1

 74.0

 74.9

 75.0

 74.6

 74.9

 73.5

HIGH LOW MEAN

 9.1

 8.8

 8.8

 8.9

 8.9

 8.9

 9.0

 9.1

 8.8

 8.6

 8.1

 7.9

 7.9

 7.9

 7.8

 7.8

 7.7

 8.1

 8.0

 7.7

 8.1

 8.1

 8.0

 8.2

 8.0

 7.8

 7.5

 8.1

 8.1

 8.3

 8.2

 8.2

 7.9

 7.9

 7.9

 7.9

 7.9

 7.9

 8.0

 7.6

 7.3

 7.3

 7.3

 7.2

 7.1

 7.0

 7.0

 7.0

 7.0

 7.2

 7.0

 7.0

 7.4

 7.5

 7.5

 7.3

 7.0

 7.0

 7.5

 7.3

 7.1

 7.5

 8.8

 8.3

 8.2

 8.3

 8.4

 8.3

 8.4

 8.5

 8.3

 7.9

 7.6

 7.5

 7.4

 7.4

 7.3

 7.3

 7.2

 7.6

 7.5

 7.3

 7.6

 7.7

 7.7

 7.8

 7.6

 7.4

 7.3

 7.8

 7.7

 7.7

 7.8

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

RIPON ON THE STANISLAUS RIVER

 ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS WATER TEMPERATURE, DEG DISSOLVED OXYZEN, PPM
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

DAY ELEV

 1,036.41

 1,036.29

 1,036.22

 1,036.03

 1,035.90

 1,035.73

 1,035.68

 1,035.51

 1,035.31

 1,035.19

 1,035.08

 1,035.15

 1,035.06

 1,034.85

 1,034.86

 1,034.87

 1,034.87

 1,034.78

 1,034.78

 1,034.73

 1,034.71

 1,034.70

 1,034.67

 1,034.61

 1,034.55

 1,034.44

 1,034.27

 1,034.15

 1,034.04

 1,033.96

 1,829.1

 1,827.9

 1,827.1

 1,825.2

 1,823.8

 1,822.0

 1,821.5

 1,819.7

 1,817.6

 1,816.4

 1,815.2

 1,816.0

 1,815.0

 1,812.8

 1,812.9

 1,813.0

 1,813.0

 1,812.1

 1,812.1

 1,811.6

 1,811.4

 1,811.3

 1,811.0

 1,810.3

 1,809.7

 1,808.6

 1,806.8

 1,805.5

 1,804.4

 1,803.6

STORAGE

-1.4

-1.3

-0.7

-2.0

-1.4

-1.8

-0.5

-1.8

-2.1

-1.3

-1.2

+0.7

-0.9

-2.2

+0.1

+0.1

+0.0

-0.9

+0.0

-0.5

-0.2

-0.1

-0.3

-0.6

-0.6

-1.1

-1.8

-1.3

-1.1

-0.8

CHANGE

958

868

905

799

951

1,204

1,172

889

780

1,074

1,032

1,491

1,301

1,102

1,292

1,109

782

1,800

1,569

1,431

1,088

786

735

903

883

884

531

852

727

763

INFLOW

 1,585

 1,471

 1,244

 1,774

 1,576

 1,910

 1,307

 1,656

 1,719

 1,591

 1,534

 994

 1,687

 2,115

 1,146

 966

 691

 2,179

 1,437

 1,582

 1,095

 764

 845

 1,147

 1,104

 1,361

 1,310

 1,401

 1,254

 1,088

POWER

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

SPILL

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

OUTLET

 61

 31

 31

 30

 61

 190

 129

 128

 115

 115

 78

 128

 88

 91

 94

 91

 91

 94

 132

 111

 98

 74

 47

 71

 94

 101

 114

 81

 50

 94

C.F.S.

 .18

 .09

 .09

 .09

 .18

 .56

 .38

 .38

 .34

 .34

 .23

 .38

 .26

 .27

 .28

 .27

 .27

 .28

 .39

 .33

 .29

 .22

 .14

 .21

 .28

 .30

 .34

 .24

 .15

 .28

INCHES

 .03

 .47

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

PRECIP

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

SEPTEMBER 2000 NEW MELONES LAKE DAILY OPERATIONS RUN DATE: January 28, 2002

IN LAKE

EVAPORATION

INCHES

C.F.S.

COMPUTED*

1000 ACRE-FEET

RELEASE - C.F.S.

TOTALS -27.0 30,661 41,533 0 0 2,713 8.04 .50

ACRE-FEET -27,000 60,816 82,381 0 0 5,381

COMMENTS:

* COMPUTED INFLOW IS THE SUM OF CHANGE IN STORAGE, RELEASES AND EVAPORATION.

SUMMARY

RELEASE (ACRE-FEET)

POWER 82,381

SPILL 0

OUTLET

TOTAL

 0

 82,381

PRECIPITATION

THIS MONTH =

TO DATE =

 .50

JULY 1, 2000 .56

 1,830.5
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY ELEV

 1,901.09

 1,900.99

 1,901.13

 1,901.31

 1,901.56

 1,901.61

 1,901.53

 1,901.46

 1,901.50

 1,901.51

 1,901.76

 1,900.80

 1,901.11

 1,901.36

 1,901.36

 1,901.39

 1,901.46

 1,901.26

 1,901.28

 1,901.33

 1,901.54

 1,901.71

 1,901.92

 1,901.70

 1,901.59

 1,901.56

 1,901.66

 1,901.34

 1,901.73

 1,901.73

 1,901.62

 13,978

 13,904

 14,008

 14,143

 14,330

 14,367

 14,307

 14,255

 14,285

 14,292

 14,479

 13,764

 13,993

 14,180

 14,180

 14,203

 14,255

 14,105

 14,120

 14,158

 14,315

 14,442

 14,599

 14,435

 14,352

 14,330

 14,405

 14,165

 14,457

 14,457

 14,375

STORAGE

-232

-74

+104

+135

+187

+37

-60

-52

+30

+7

+187

-715

+229

+187

+0

+23

+52

-150

+15

+38

+157

+127

+157

-164

-83

-22

+75

-240

+292

+0

-82

CHANGE

1,641

1,399

1,734

1,562

1,606

1,762

1,661

1,652

1,600

1,655

1,677

1,188

1,702

1,669

1,606

1,616

1,669

1,604

1,604

1,996

2,095

2,033

2,051

1,954

1,922

1,975

1,987

2,021

3,384

2,527

1,998

INFLOW

 80

 37

 0

 32

 80

 80

 80

 80

 80

 80

 80

 80

 80

 80

 80

 80

 80

 80

 80

 80

 80

 80

 80

 80

 80

 80

 80

 29

 0

 50

 80

POWER

 331

 395

 440

 347

 319

 326

 315

 297

 307

 319

 320

 320

 317

 318

 316

 318

 318

 320

 320

 320

 320

 321

 322

 321

 322

 323

 312

 472

 1,475

 829

 324

SPILL

 65

 68

 75

 75

 75

 75

 75

 75

 75

 75

 75

 75

 75

 75

 75

 75

 75

 75

 75

 75

 75

 75

 75

 75

 75

 75

 75

 126

 155

 105

 75

OUTLETS

 8

 6

 8

 7

 6

 6

 5

 7

 9

 8

 9

 6

 7

 6

 6

 7

 6

 6

 7

 5

 7

 6

 6

 6

 6

 7

 6

 6

 6

 6

 6

C.F.S.

 .35

 .29

 .35

 .33

 .29

 .28

 .24

 .32

 .39

 .38

 .39

 .28

 .30

 .27

 .29

 .33

 .27

 .27

 .31

 .24

 .34

 .25

 .26

 .25

 .25

 .31

 .27

 .27

 .29

 .26

 .25

INCHES

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

AUGUST 2005 LEWISTON LAKE DAILY OPERATIONS RUN DATE: March 7, 2006

IN LAKE

EVAPORATION

C.F.S. FRANCIS CARR

COMPUTED*

ACRE-FEET

RELEASE - C.F.S. 

TOTALS +165 56,550 2,148 2,469 11,924 203 9.17

ACRE-FEET +165 112,167 4,261 4,897 23,651 403

* COMPUTED INFLOW IS THE SUM OF CHANGE IN STORAGE, RELEASES AND EVAPORATION.

(1) OUTLET RELEASE INCLUDES THE CONTINUOUS FISH RELEASE OF 75 C.F.S.

SUMMARY

RELEASE (ACRE-FEET)

TOTAL POWER 4,261

TOTAL RIVER 32,809 111,600

 14,210

 78,791

RIVER

JUDGE FRANCIS CARR POWERPLANT

TOTAL RELEASE

JUDGE (2)

(1) POWERPLANT

 1,274

 930

 1,159

 1,033

 1,032

 1,256

 1,216

 1,219

 1,114

 1,169

 1,099

 1,067

 1,108

 1,096

 1,129

 1,124

 1,164

 1,199

 1,114

 1,497

 1,534

 1,487

 1,489

 1,555

 1,481

 1,501

 1,476

 1,509

 1,601

 1,537

 1,554

 39,723

 78,791

Table 6
Electrical Conductivity, UMHOS WATER TEMPERATURE, DEG DISSOLVED OXYZEN, PPM

Day High Low Mean High Low Mean High Low Mean

1 144 126 133 49.5 47.4 48.4 10.8 10.1 10.4

2 148 126 136 50.3 48.3 49.4 10.4 10.1 10.3

3 154 149 152 52.1 49.5 50.9 10.1 9.5 9.9

4 150 145 148 52.9 51.4 52.1 9.8 9.5 9.7

5 146 136 141 52.1 50.5 51.5 10.1 9.7 9.9

6 139 132 135 51.6 49.2 50.6 10.5 10.0 10.3

7 142 133 138 52.1 49.7 51.0 10.5 10.1 10.3

8 144 139 141 52.3 50.5 51.3 10.5 9.9 10.2

9 139 127 134 50.8 49.7 50.3 10.7 10.4 10.6

10 178 124 140 51.4 50.4 50.8 10.4 8.4 9.7

11 160 131 139 53.8 51.5 52.8 9.3 8.8 9.0

12 147 129 138 53.9 53.6 53.8 9.1 8.4 8.8

13 148 128 143 55.5 53.5 54.5 9.0 7.1 8.0

14 145 134 139 55.5 54.9 55.2 8.6 7.5 8.2

15 150 142 147 55.2 53.8 54.3 8.3 7.3 7.9

16 154 150 153 0.0 0.0 0.0 7.4 2.4 5.4

17 169 154 160 0.0 0.0 0.0 3.5 0.1 1.1

18 185 170 178 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.2 0.0 0.2

19 189 185 188 0.0 0.0 0.0 8.5 0.0 8.5

20 169 107 122 0.0 0.0 0.0 9.6 8.7 9.2

21 126 111 120 0.0 0.0 0.0 10.0 9.0 9.5

22 127 106 113 0.0 0.0 0.0 9.6 2.6 7.4

23 132 117 123 0.0 0.0 0.0 9.6 2.8 6.5

24 129 104 111 0.0 0.0 0.0 11.1 8.8 10.4

25 104 100 102 53.2 52.1 52.6 11.3 11.1 11.2

26 102 95 97 53.1 51.7 52.4 11.5 11.2 11.4

27 97 93 95 53.0 51.4 52.3 11.6 11.3 11.5

28 96 92 93 53.0 50.9 52.3 11.4 11.0 11.2

29 119 95 101 51.1 50.2 50.6 11.3 9.7 10.6

30 125 112 117 53.7 50.7 52.2 10.2 9.0 9.6

31 120 106 114 56.4 52.7 54.5 9.9 9.1 9.6

COMMENT(S):

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

Historical Archive and Report Database

Ripon on the Stanislaus River Water Quality

Period: March 2023 Run Date: 4/7/2023
### Part B—Authorization To Promote Compliance With Trade Agreements
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

AHMED ABDUL AZIZ,

Petitioner,

v.

BARACK OBAMA, et al.,

Respondents.

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

 Civil Action No. 05-0492 (JR)

ORDER

Upon review of Petitioner’s first motion for leave to

take discovery, and Respondents’ opposition, requests 1 and 3

(insofar as they request access to an individual for

questioning), 7, 16, 21, and 23, are denied, and the remaining

requests (including the remaining portions of requests 1 and 3)

are denied without prejudice to a further motion filed with or

after Petitioner’s traverse, showing that, for specified reasons,

Petitioner cannot present facts essential to justify his

traverse.

It is SO ORDERED.

 JAMES ROBERTSON

United States District Judge
### Part II—General Matters
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### Health Resources and Services Administration

In accordance with section 10(a)(2) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act (Pub. L. 92-463), notice is hereby given of the following meeting:

*Name:*                         National Advisory Council on Migrant  Health.                    

*Dates and Times:*                         May 13, 2011, 2 p.m. to 5 p.m., May 14, 2011, 8:30 a.m. to 5 p.m. May 15, 2011, 8:30 a.m. to 2 p.m.                    

*Place:*                         Delray Beach Residence Inn,  1111 East Atlantic Avenue,  Delray Beach, Florida 33483.                         *Telephone:*                         561-276-7441.                         *Fax:*                         561-276-7445.                    

*Status:*                         The meeting will be open to the public.                    

*Purpose:*                         The purpose of the meeting is to discuss services and issues related to the health of migrant and seasonal farmworkers and their families and to formulate recommendations for the Secretary of Health and Human Services.                    

*Agenda:*                         The agenda includes an overview of the Council's general business activities. The Council will also hear presentations from experts on farmworker issues, including the status of farmworker health at the local and national levels.                    

Agenda items are subject to change as priorities indicate.

*For Further Information Contact:*                     Marcia Gomez, M.D., Office of Special Population Health, Bureau of Primary Health Care, Health Resources and Services Administration, 5600 Fishers Lane, Maryland 20857; telephone (301) 594-4897.                

Dated: April 13, 2011.

Reva Harris,

Acting Director, Division of Policy and Information Coordination.

[FR Doc. 2011-9549 Filed 4-19-11; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4165-15-P
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr., Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Marilyn Kelly

Stephen J. Markman

Diane M. Hathaway

Mary Beth Kelly

Brian K. Zahra, Justices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

 _________________________________________

 Clerk

July 24, 2012

s0716

Order 

July 24, 2012

144172

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

v SC: 144172

COA: 302915

Oakland CC: 2006-206890-FC

DENNIS ANTHONY HALL,

Defendant-Appellant.

_________________________________________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the September 13, 2011 

order of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because the defendant’s 

motion for relief from judgment is prohibited by MCR 6.502(G).
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY HIGH

 208

 229

 167

 160

 146

 151

 146

 141

 147

 145

 151

 169

 164

 167

 172

 157

 156

 144

 142

 143

 274

 1,363

 1,765

 509

 646

 235

 182

 160

 162

 160

 152

 150

 149

 145

 137

 130

 127

 128

 127

 130

 135

 139

 141

 142

 142

 136

 136

 136

 133

 127

 127

 130

 136

 135

 127

 128

 126

 128

 129

 130

 131

 133

 165

 164

 153

 145

 138

 135

 134

 133

 136

 138

 144

 148

 151

 152

 151

 143

 141

 138

 135

 134

 149

 303

 323

 181

 178

 148

 144

 142

 142

 141

 141

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

MAY 2006 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: June 2, 2006

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

PORT CHICAGO TOP IN SUISUN BAY
Partner

Case Study

Company Profile

Headquarters Location

Joplin, Missouri

Contact:

Bruce Stockton

VP, Maintenance 

(417) 659-5085

bstockton@cfi-us.com

Number of Employees:

2,784

Strategy Category:

Idling Reduction

Number of Trailers:

7,190

Number of Power Units:

2,157

Contract Freighters, Inc.

www.epa.gov/smartway

Contract Freighters, Inc. (CFI), is an international company that is 

serious about environmental stewardship. CFI hauls everything from

“cookies to computers” within the United States, Canada, and Mexico,

notes Bruce Stockton, vice-president of maintenance. CFI trucks travel 300

million miles annually, thus leaving a positive environmental footprint is an

important aspect of their business. “More customers and shippers are asking us

if we are members of SmartWay and about our environmental stance. Service is

all we have to sell, thus our environmental efforts are critical to our business,”

notes Stockton. In 2005, CFI turned to SmartWay for help with analyzing and

improving their environmental impact.

CFI’s use of idle reduction strategies in its fleet has resulted in great reductions

in CO2 emissions and amount of fuel consumed. CFI idle reduction strategies

include implementation of APU units and the use of double-drivers. In 2007,

CFI predicts that using the double-driver technique will save CFI over 364,000

gallons of fuel and reduce their CO2 output by over 4,000 tons in 2007 as well.

In addition, CFI expects to save 2,707 gallons of fuel, reduce CO2 emissions by

30 tons, and save over $7,000 using APU idle reduction technology. Stockton

notes that balancing driver comfort and corporate responsibility is important to

CFI. “We listen to our drivers needs and use their feedback and ideas to help us

make decisions concerning future emission and fuel reduction strategies,” adds

Stockton.

“SmartWay has made us feel like we are a part of a solution and not part of the

problem. The SmartWay FLEET calculator helps our company calculate the

payback of new technologies as well as the fuel saving we will experience and

the emissions we will be reducing. SmartWay teaches us new 

progressive ideas and strategies,”

comments Stockton. Idling 

reduction strategies have had a substantial positive impact to CFI’s 

bottom line. Says Stockton, “idling

is a serious issue as more local 

governments seek to develop idle

regulations. Developing an idle

reduction strategy not only saves

money but is the right thing to do.”

Idling Reduction

EPA420-F-07-004
### SUBCHAPTER IV—ENFORCEMENT