alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 74 (Monday, April 18, 2011)]
[Notices]
[Pages 21734-21735]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2011-9304]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket No. ER11-3318-000]

Woodway Energy Partners, LLC; Supplemental Notice That Initial 
Market-Based Rate Filing Includes Request for Blanket Section 204 
Authorization

    This is a supplemental notice in the above-referenced proceeding of 
Woodway Energy Partners, LLC's application for market-based rate 
authority, with an accompanying rate tariff, noting that such 
application includes a request for blanket authorization, under 18 CFR 
part 34, of future issuances of securities and assumptions of 
liability.
    Any person desiring to intervene or to protest should file with the 
Federal

[[Page 21735]]

Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE., Washington, DC 
20426, in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the Commission's Rules 
of Practice and Procedure (18 CFR 385.211 and 385.214). Anyone filing a 
motion to intervene or protest must serve a copy of that document on 
the Applicant.
    Notice is hereby given that the deadline for filing protests with 
regard to the applicant's request for blanket authorization, under 18 
CFR part 34, of future issuances of securities and assumptions of 
liability, is May 2, 2011.
    The Commission encourages electronic submission of protests and 
interventions in lieu of paper, using the FERC Online links at http://www.ferc.gov. To facilitate electronic service, persons with Internet 
access who will eFile a document and/or be listed as a contact for an 
intervenor must create and validate an eRegistration account using the 
eRegistration link. Select the eFiling link to log on and submit the 
intervention or protests.
    Persons unable to file electronically should submit an original and 
14 copies of the intervention or protest to the Federal Energy 
Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE., Washington, DC 20426.
    The filings in the above-referenced proceeding are accessible in 
the Commission's eLibrary system by clicking on the appropriate link in 
the above list. They are also available for review in the Commission's 
Public Reference Room in Washington, DC. There is an eSubscription link 
on the Web site that enables subscribers to receive e-mail notification 
when a document is added to a subscribed docket(s). For assistance with 
any FERC Online service, please e-mail [email protected] or 
call (866) 208-3676 (toll free). For TTY, call (202) 502-8659.

    Dated: April 11, 2011.
Nathaniel J. Davis, Sr.,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2011-9304 Filed 4-15-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P
```
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY ELEV

 223.80

 223.76

 222.30

 220.75

 222.30

 222.95

 220.69

 221.80

 223.05

 221.50

 222.01

 223.03

 223.67

 221.54

 222.54

 224.01

 222.22

 221.53

 220.75

 221.11

 222.47

 223.76

 224.02

 223.79

 223.42

 223.07

 222.45

 221.76

 223.70

 224.59

 224.75

 53,189

 53,081

 49,182

 45,106

 49,182

 50,913

 44,949

 47,861

 51,180

 47,073

 48,411

 51,126

 52,840

 47,178

 49,820

 53,754

 48,969

 47,152

 45,106

 46,049

 49,634

 53,081

 53,780

 53,162

 52,169

 51,233

 49,580

 47,756

 52,920

 55,320

 55,754

STORAGE

+2,116

-108

-3,899

-4,076

+4,076

+1,731

-5,964

+2,912

+3,319

-4,107

+1,338

+2,715

+1,714

-5,662

+2,642

+3,934

-4,785

-1,817

-2,046

+943

+3,585

+3,447

+699

-618

-993

-936

-1,653

-1,824

+5,164

+2,400

+434

CHANGE

0

0

0

38

433

603

701

859

802

677

425

218

192

417

515

433

306

177

202

1,057

1,419

1,265

1,212

1,191

1,055

828

539

686

484

606

811

PUMPING

 6,524

 7,172

 6,761

 6,681

 6,935

 7,195

 6,897

 6,176

 7,392

 7,199

 6,773

 6,666

 6,497

 6,326

 5,829

 5,941

 6,652

 6,968

 7,592

 7,475

 6,573

 6,069

 6,423

 6,549

 6,690

 6,140

 6,846

 6,371

 5,140

 5,618

 5,748

PUMPING

 0

 0

 1,584

 1,173

 0

 0

 1,582

 0

 0

 1,538

 396

 0

 0

 1,630

 403

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

PUMPING

 1,184

 230

 475

 295

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 6

 0

 0

GEN.

*

-157

-2

-6

-56

-247

+11

+218

-41

-69

+155

-45

-210

-139

+69

-120

-40

+98

+124

+171

+60

-112

+195

-107

-45

-27

-333

-252

-154

-227

-82

+263

OR

UNITED STATES 

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION

CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT

CONSOLIDATED STATE-FEDERAL O'NEILL FOREBAY August 29, 2013

DAILY OPERATIONS

JULY 2013 RUN DATE:

IN LAKE GEN.

ACRE-FEET O'NEILL

RELEASE - C.F.S. 

TOTALS +4,681 18,151 2,190 8,306 203,818 -1,107

ACRE-FEET +4,681 36,003 4,344 16,475 404,273

SUMMARY

 877

RELEASE (ACRE-FEET)

O'NEILL GEN. 4,344

SAN LUIS PUMP 16,475 877

 51,073

DOS AMIGOS PUMP 404,273

DELIVERIES 

S. LUIS O'NEILL

 2,893

 780

 0

 0

 3,153

 2,640

 0

 2,124

 2,813

 0

 2,038

 2,845

 2,592

 0

 2,013

 2,816

 0

 2,115

 2,820

 2,800

 2,787

 2,377

 1,931

 886

 0

 1,020

 1,360

 1,360

 2,366

 1,942

 0

 50,471

 100,109

CALIF. DOS AMIGOS

AQUEDUCT

6,038

6,569

6,860

6,112

5,652

4,814

4,554

4,702

5,519

5,835

5,425

5,182

4,715

4,615

5,157

4,716

3,837

3,637

3,368

4,032

4,286

3,970

3,739

4,206

5,161

4,153

4,365

3,559

5,126

4,362

5,335

 149,601

 296,734

S. LUIS

DELIV.

GAINS(+)

LOSS(-)

C.F.S.

INFLOW - C.F.S.

STATE OF CALIFORNIA

THE RESOURCES AGENCY

DEPARTMENT OF WATER RESOURCES

STATE WATER PROJECT

TOTAL 425,969

-2,196

* DAILY DEL. FIGURES UNAVAILABLE. TOT. DEL. IS INCLUDED IN COMPUTING MONTHLY TOTALS 

Table 18
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,  AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of ALCO, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-QSB/A for the period ended March 31, 2006 (the "Report"), I, Andrew Liu, President and Chairman of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

> 1) The Report fully complies with the requirement of Section 13(a) or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange
> Act of 1934; and
> 
> 
> 2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the Company's
> financial position and results of operations.

/s/Andrew Liu



Andrew Liu, President and Chairman

September 14, 2006
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
 Washington, D.C. 20549
 FORM 8-K
 CURRENT REPORT
Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
 Date of Report (Date of earliest event reported): July 21, 2011
 MEDCO HEALTH SOLUTIONS, INC.
 
 Delaware
    
    1-31312
    
    22-3461740(State or other 
Jurisdiction of 
Incorporation)
    
    (Commission File Number)
    
    (IRS Employer Identification No.)
 100 Parsons Pond Drive, Franklin Lakes, NJ
    
    07417(Address of Principal Executive Offices)
    
    (Zip Code)
 201-269-3400
 
  o
    
    Written communications pursuant to Rule 425 under the Securities Act (17 CFR 230.425)
 þ
    
    Soliciting material pursuant to Rule 14a-12 under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.14a-12)
 o
    
    Pre-commencement communications pursuant to Rule 14d-2(b) under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.14d-2(b))
 o
    
    Pre-commencement communications pursuant to Rule 13e-4(c) under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.13e-4(c))




---



##### 



Item 8.01
    
    Other Events
  
    
    Communication Toolkit
 
    
    Investor Script
 
    
    Letter to Employees
 
    
    E-mail to UBC Employees
 Cautionary Statement Regarding Forward-Looking Statements
   Additional Information About this Transaction




---



##### 



Item 9.01
    
    Financial Statements and Exhibits
 (d)
    
    Exhibits
  Exhibit No.
    
    Exhibits99.1
    
    
    Communication Toolkit99.2
    
    
    Investor Script99.3
    
    
    Letter to Employees99.4
    
    
    E-mail to UBC Employees




---



##### 



SIGNATURES
  MEDCO HEALTH SOLUTIONS, INC.By:
    /s/ Thomas M. MoriartyThomas M. MoriartyDate: July 21, 2011
    
    General Counsel, Secretary and
President, Global Pharmaceutical
Strategies
## F IRST 

## D ISTRICT 

## C OURT OF 

## A PPEAL 

## S TATE OF 

## F LORIDA

_____________________________
No. 1D 17

- 2909

_____________________________
J EROME D ICKEY , Appellant,

v.

S TATE OF F LORIDA , Appellee.

_____________________________

On appeal from the Circuit Court for Leon County

. Martin A. Fitzpatrick , Judge

. September 26, 2018

P ER C URIAM

.
A FFIRMED

.
L EWIS , R AY , and M.K. T HOMAS , JJ., concur

.

_____________________________ Not final until disposition of any timely and authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 9.331

.

_____________________________2 Jerome Dickey, pro se
, Appellant.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, and Trisha Meggs Pate, Assistant Attorney General, Tallahassee
, for Appellee.
##### 



Exhibit 32 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 In connection with the quarterly report of Identix Incorporated (the Company) on Form 10-Q for
the quarter ended December 31, 2004 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the
date hereof (the Report), each of Joseph J. Atick, President and Chief Executive Officer of the
Company, and Elissa J. Lindsoe, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certifies, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that: (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Company. /s/ Joseph J Atick
    
    
    
    Date: February 9, 2005Joseph J. Atick, Chief Executive Officer/s/ Elissa J. Lindsoe
    
    
    
    Date: February 9, 2005Elissa J. Lindsoe, Chief Financial Officer
(No. 5856

#### Garfield Park Moving and Storage Company, Claimant, *vs.*State of Illinois, Department of Public Aid, Respondent.

*Opinion filed August 3, 1972.*

Garfield Park Moving and Storage Company, Claimant, pro se.

William J. Scott, Attorney General; Saul R. Wexler, Assistant Attorney General, for Respondent.

Perlin, C.J.
### §1291. Omitted

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section, act Apr. 30, 1946, ch. 244, title III, §301, 60 Stat. 148, which stated the purposes of this subchapter, was omitted on authority of subsec. (b)(1) of this section which provided that this subchapter be effective until the expiration of the revised agreement between the United States and the Republic of the Philippines which occurred on July 4, 1974.
### **CHAPTER 79—TRADE SANCTIONS REFORM AND EXPORT ENHANCEMENT**

Sec.
7201.
Definitions.
7202.
Restriction.
7203.
Exceptions.
7204.
Termination of sanctions.
7205.
State sponsors of international terrorism.
7206.
Congressional procedures.
7207.
Prohibition on United States assistance and financing.
7208.
Prohibition on additional imports from Cuba.
7209.
Requirements relating to certain travel-related transactions with Cuba.
7210.
Application of the Trade Sanctions Reform and Export Enhancement Act.
7211.
Technical clarification relating to provision of material support to terrorism.
#### Freddie C. GADDIS, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. UNION PACIFIC RAILROAD CO., Defendant-Appellee.

No. 05-30006.

Summary Calendar.

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.

Decided Feb. 23, 2006.

Freddie C. Gaddis, Monroe, LA, pro se.

W. Craig Henry, Hudson, Potts & Bernstein, Monroe, LA, for Defendant-Appellee.

Before GARWOOD, HIGGINBOTHAM and DAVIS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: *

Freddie C. Gaddis, proceeding *pro se*here and below, has appealed the district court’s order denying his motion for relief, under Fed.R.Civ.P. 60(b), from the district court’s judgment dismissing his complaint *608seeking relief under the Federal Employers Liability Act.

Gaddis, proceeding *pro se,*filed his suit in May 1996 in respect to injuries he allegedly received in July 1977. Union Pacific Railroad Co., successor by merger to the named defendant Missouri Pacific Railroad Co., moved for summary judgment on the basis that Gaddis’s claim was barred by limitations. The district court granted the motion for summary judgment and dismissed Gaddis’s suit with prejudice. Gad-dis timely appealed to this court, but thereafter, in April 1998, this court dismissed his appeal for want of prosecution.

Gaddis’s instant Rule 60(b) motion was filed in June 2004. In that motion Gaddis claims that the defendant fraudulently “duped” him into not responding to its limitations-based motion for summary judgment by telling him that the court “was not going to grant” the motion.

Gaddis does not argue on appeal that the district court erred in treating his pleading as a motion pursuant to Rule 60(b), rather than as an independent action asserting fraud on the court pursuant to the savings clause of Rule 60(b). See Fed. R.Civ.P. 60(b); *Wilson v. Johns-Manville Sales Corp.,*873 F.2d 869, 872 (5th Cir. 1989).

To the extent that Gaddis sought relief based on fraud, under Fed.R.Civ.P. 60(b)(3), the motion was untimely. To the extent that he sought relief based on a void judgment, under Fed.R.Civ.P. 60(b)(4), Gaddis has not shown that the district court acted “outside its legal powers.” *Carter v. Fenner,*136 F.3d 1000, 1005 (5th Cir.1998).

Because the appeal is without arguable merit, it is DISMISSED AS FRIVOLOUS. *See Howard v. King,*707 F.2d 215, 219-20 (5th Cir.1983); 5th Cir. R. 42.2.

*

 Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5 the Court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except

under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

April 13, 2006

Charles R. Fulbruge III

Clerk

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 05-60305

Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

BEN LANE,

Defendant-Appellant.

--------------------

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Northern District of Mississippi

USDC No. 2:04-CR-11-1

--------------------

Before SMITH, GARZA, and PRADO, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Ben Lane appeals his conviction following a jury trial for

conspiracy to obstruct interstate commerce; aiding and abetting

in the obstruction of interstate commerce; and possession of a

firearm in relation to a crime of violence. First, he asserts

that the district court erred in denying his motion for a

judgment of acquittal. We reject this assertion, as Lane has

failed to show that a reasonable jury could not have found him

guilty beyond a reasonable doubt. See United States v. Sanchez,

961 F.2d 1169, 1173 (5th Cir. 1992). We find unpersuasive his
No. 05-60305

-2-

arguments that (1) a firearm discovered by police did not link

him to the crime and that (2) certain witnesses were not

credible. See id.

Likewise, we reject Lane’s assertion that the district court

erred in enhancing his sentence based upon facts that were not

determined by the jury. See United States v. Mares, 402 F.3d

511, 519 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 126 S. Ct. 43 (2005).

Accordingly, the judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.
### §675. Assaulting, resisting, or impeding certain persons; murder; protection of such persons

Any person who forcibly assaults, resists, opposes, impedes, intimidates, or interferes with any person while engaged in or on account of the performance of his official duties under this chapter shall be fined not more than $5,000 or imprisoned not more than three years, or both. Whoever, in the commission of any such acts, uses a deadly or dangerous weapon, shall be fined not more than $10,000 or imprisoned not more than ten years, or both. Whoever kills any person while engaged in or on account of the performance of his official duties under this chapter shall be punished as provided under sections 1111 and 1114 of title 18.

(Mar. 4, 1907, ch. 2907, title IV, §405, as added Pub. L. 90–201, §16, Dec. 15, 1967, 81 Stat. 599.)
### §1054. Annual report to Congressional committees

(a) 1 Not later than March 1 of each year following December 29, 1970, the Secretary shall submit to the Committee on Agriculture of the House of Representatives and the Committee on Agriculture, Nutrition, and Forestry of the Senate a comprehensive and detailed written report with respect to—

(1) the processing, storage, handling, and distribution of eggs and egg products subject to the provisions of this chapter; the inspection of establishments operated in connection therewith; the effectiveness of the operation of the inspection, including the effectiveness of the operations of State egg inspection programs; and recommendations for legislation to improve such program; and

(2) the administration of section 1046 of this title (relating to imports) during the immediately preceding calendar year, including but not limited to—

(A) a certification by the Secretary that foreign plants exporting eggs or egg products to the United States have complied with requirements of this chapter and regulations issued thereunder;

(B) the names and locations of plants authorized or permitted to export eggs or egg products to the United States;

(C) the number of inspectors employed by the Department of Agriculture in the calendar year concerned who were assigned to inspect plants referred to in paragraph (B) hereof and the frequency with which each such plant was inspected by such inspectors;

(D) the number of inspectors that were licensed by each country from which any imports were received and that were assigned, during the calendar year concerned, to inspect such imports and the facilities in which such imports were handled; and the frequency and effectiveness of such inspections;

(E) the total volume of eggs and egg products which was imported into the United States during the calendar year concerned from each country, including a separate itemization of the volume of each major category of such imports from each country during such year, and a detailed report of rejections of plants and products because of failure to meet appropriate standards prescribed by this chapter; and

(F) recommendations for legislation to improve such program.

(Pub. L. 91–597, §26, Dec. 29, 1970, 84 Stat. 1634; Pub. L. 103–437, §8(4), Nov. 2, 1994, 108 Stat. 4588.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

This chapter, referred to in subsec. (a)(1), (2)(A), (E), was in the original "this Act", meaning Pub. L. 91–597, Dec. 29, 1970, 84 Stat. 1620, which is classified principally to this chapter. For complete classification of this Act to the Code, see Short Title note set out under section 1031 of this title and Tables.

#### Amendments

1994—Pub. L. 103–437 substituted "Agriculture, Nutrition, and Forestry" for "Agriculture and Forestry" in introductory provisions.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date

For effective date of this section, see section 29 of Pub. L. 91–597, set out as a note under section 1031 of this title.

1 So in original. No subsec. (b) has been enacted.
Exhibit 23.1


CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM


The Board of Directors


Apigee Corporation:


We consent to the incorporation by reference in the registration statement (No. 333-203614 and 333-207555) on Form S-8 of Apigee Corporation and subsidiaries of our report dated October 7, 2016, with respect to the consolidated balance sheets of Apigee Corporation and subsidiaries as of July 31, 2016 and 2015 , and the related consolidated statements of comprehensive loss, stockholders’ equity, and cash flows for each of the years in the three-year period ended July 31, 2016 , which report appears in the July 31, 2016 annual report on Form 10-K of Apigee Corporation and subsidiaries.


/s/ KPMG LLP


Santa Clara, CA


October 7, 2016
**MEMORANDUM**

Date: February

1 5 , 2012 Subject: Stakeholder call about MOVES Transition for Regional Conformit y Anal yses From: Meg Patulski, State Measures and Transportation Planning Center , OTAQ To: Docket EPA - HQ - OAR - 2011 - 0393 On October 13, 2010, a conference call was held to discuss stakeholder concerns regarding the transition to using MOVES for regional conformity anal ys es in five metropolitan areas – Houston, TX; Dallas, TX; Salt L ake Cit y, UT; Atlanta, GA; and Washington, DC. EPA’s Office of Transportation and Air Qualit y and the Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) hosted the call based on a request from the Association of Metropolitan Planning Organizations (AMPO) and the American Association of State Highway and Transp ortation O fficials (AASHTO) . In addition to EPA, FHWA, AMPO, and AASHTO, the following agencies were represented on the conference call:  MPOs from the following metropolitan areas: Houston - Galveston, TX; Dallas - Fort Worth, TX; Atlanta, GA; and Washington, DC.  State DOTs from: Texas, Utah, Georgia, Virginia and New York .  State air agencies from: Georgia. These ag encies r equested additional transition time for using MOVES in regional conformity anal ys es, due to the significant software, operational and technical differences between MOVES and the previous emissions model, MOBILE . S ome agencies shared their preliminary experiences to date with using MOVES , and their concerns that there would not be sufficient time to prepare for using MOVES in regiona l conformity anal ys es . At the time, the conformit y grace period for regional conformity anal ys es with MOVES2010a would expire on March 2, 2012.
#### § 229.83 Deportation.

The age DIB O/M is not payable for any month after the month the Board receives notice that the employee has been deported for a reason shown in section 202(h) of the Social Security Act. This restriction no longer applies if the employee is later legally admitted to the United States for permanent residence.
#### § 404.927 Effect of expedited appeals process agreement.

After an expedited appeals process agreement is signed, you will not need to complete the remaining steps of the administrative review process. Instead, you may file an action in a Federal district court within 60 days after the date you receive notice (a signed copy of the agreement will be mailed to you and will constitute notice) that the agreement has been signed by our authorized representative.

[45 FR 52081, Aug. 5, 1980, as amended at 49 FR 46369, Nov. 26, 1984]
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA

No. DA 20-0343

STATE OF MONTANA,

Plaintiff and Appellee,

v.

WILLIAM JAMES HARNING,

Defendant and Appellant.

ORDER

Upon consideration of Appellant’s motion for extension of time, 

and good cause appearing,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Appellant is granted an extension 

of time to and including July 12, 2021, within which to prepare, file, 

and serve Appellant’s opening brief on appeal.

Electronically signed by:

Mike McGrath

Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

June 4 2021

06/04/2021

Case Number: DA 20-0343