alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### Aurelia M. Burnstine, Respondent, v. Nathan Burnstine, Appellant.

Judgment affirmed, with costs. No opinion. Present — Ingraham, P. J., McLaughlin, Laughlin, Clarke and Scott, JJ.
Electrical Conductivity, UMHOS

Day High Low Mean

1 0 0 0

2 0 0 0

3 0 0 0

4 0 0 0

5 0 0 0

6 0 0 0

7 0 0 0

8 0 0 0

9 0 0 0

10 0 0 0

11 0 0 0

12 0 0 0

13 0 0 0

14 0 0 0

15 0 0 0

16 0 0 0

17 0 0 0

18 0 0 0

19 0 0 0

20 0 0 0

21 0 0 0

22 0 0 0

23 0 0 0

24 0 0 0

25 0 0 0

26 0 0 0

27 0 0 0

28 0 0 0

29 0 0 0

30 0 0 0

COMMENT(S):

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

Historical Archive and Report Database

Pittsburg TopOn The Sacramento River

Period: November 2023 Run Date: 12/8/2023
EXHIBIT 3.9
 Delaware
 
 The First State
  
 /s/ Harriett Smith WindsorHarriet Smith Windsor, Secretary of State 4640071 8100
    
    AUTHENTICATION: 7055774081241333
    
    Date: 12-31-08




---



##### 



CERTIFICATE OF FORMATION
 OF
 CMCH HOLDINGS, LLC
      th
 /s/ J. Thomas AndersonJ. Thomas Anderson, Authorized Person STATE OF DELAWARE
SECRETARY OF STATE
DIVISION OF CORPORATIONS
DELIVERED 06:49 PM 12/30/2008
FILED 06:49 PM 12/30/2008
SRV 081241333- 4640071 FILE
```

[Congressional Bills 114th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 4224 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

114th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 4224

To designate the Federal building and United States courthouse located 
at 121 Spring Street SE in Gainesville, Georgia, as the ``Sidney Olsin 
      Smith, Jr. Federal Building and United States Courthouse''.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           December 10, 2015

    Mr. Collins of Georgia introduced the following bill; which was 
     referred to the Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To designate the Federal building and United States courthouse located 
at 121 Spring Street SE in Gainesville, Georgia, as the ``Sidney Olsin 
      Smith, Jr. Federal Building and United States Courthouse''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SIDNEY OLSIN SMITH, JR. FEDERAL BUILDING AND UNITED STATES 
              COURTHOUSE.

    (a) Designation.--The Federal building and United States courthouse 
located at 121 Spring Street SE in Gainesville, Georgia, shall be known 
and designated as the ``Sidney Olsin Smith, Jr. Federal Building and 
United States Courthouse''.
    (b) References.--Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, 
paper, or other record of the United States to the Federal building and 
United States courthouse referred to in subsection (a) shall be deemed 
to be a reference to the ``Sidney Olsin Smith, Jr. Federal Building and 
United States Courthouse''.
                                 <all>
```
I 

114TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 4246 

To exempt for an additional 4-year period, from the application of the meanstest presumption of abuse under chapter 7, qualifying members of reserve 

components of the Armed Forces and members of the National Guard 

who, after September 11, 2001, are called to active duty or to perform 

a homeland defense activity for not less than 90 days. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

DECEMBER 15, 2015 

Mr. COHEN (for himself, Mr. NADLER, Mr. ROHRABACHER, and Mr. FORBES) 

introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on the 

Judiciary 

A BILL 

To exempt for an additional 4-year period, from the application of the means-test presumption of abuse under chapter 7, qualifying members of reserve components of the 

Armed Forces and members of the National Guard who, 

after September 11, 2001, are called to active duty or 

to perform a homeland defense activity for not less than 

90 days. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 


SSpencer on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 4246 IH

1 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

2 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘National Guard and 

3 Reservist Debt Relief Extension Act of 2015’’. 

4 SEC. 2. NATIONAL GUARD AND RESERVISTS DEBT RELIEF 

5 AMENDMENT. 

6 Section 4(b) of the National Guard and Reservists 

7 Debt Relief Act of 2008 (Public Law 110–438; 122 Stat. 

8 5000) is amended by striking ‘‘7-year’’ and inserting ‘‘11- 

9 year’’. 

Æ 


SSpencer on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY HIGH

 253

 271

 328

 536

 1,384

 962

 718

 244

 212

 218

 193

 182

 213

 198

 215

 208

 210

 205

 229

 231

 214

 203

 211

 229

 244

 244

 239

 221

 219

 215

 220

 181

 183

 185

 189

 195

 197

 200

 201

 199

 168

 157

 161

 165

 189

 190

 193

 200

 184

 167

 160

 154

 148

 141

 156

 184

 169

 157

 169

 171

 178

 183

 192

 197

 214

 239

 348

 296

 243

 209

 205

 188

 169

 170

 185

 193

 195

 201

 204

 195

 189

 193

 180

 169

 167

 190

 207

 208

 199

 190

 190

 196

 202

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

JANUARY 2016 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: February 17, 2016

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

RIO VISTA ON THE SACRAMENTO RIVER
### §2725. Fees for use of the George P. Shultz National Foreign Affairs Training Center

The Secretary is authorized to charge a fee for use of the George P. Shultz National Foreign Affairs Training Center of the Department of State. Amounts collected under this section (including reimbursements and surcharges) shall be deposited as an offsetting collection to any Department of State appropriation to recover the costs of such use and shall remain available for obligation until expended.

(Aug. 1, 1956, ch. 841, title I, §53, as added Pub. L. 105–277, div. G, subdiv. B, title XXII, §2205(b), Oct. 21, 1998, 112 Stat. 2681–809; amended Pub. L. 107–132, §2(a), Jan. 16, 2002, 115 Stat. 2412.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

2002—Pub. L. 107–132 inserted "George P. Shultz" before "National Foreign Affairs Training Center" in section catchline and in text.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Reporting on Pilot Program

Pub. L. 105–277, div. G, subdiv. B, title XXII, §2205(c), Oct. 21, 1998, 112 Stat. 2681–809, required the Secretary of State to submit, two years after Oct. 21, 1998, a report to Congress on the number of persons taking advantage of the pilot program established under section 4021 of this title and this section, their business or government affiliations, the amount of fees collected, and the impact of the program on the primary mission of the National Foreign Affairs Training Center, prior to repeal by Pub. L. 107–228, div. A, title III, §318(3), Sept. 30, 2002, 116 Stat. 1380.
**EXHIBIT 31.1****CERTIFICATION**     I, Harold F. Zagunis, Chief Financial Officer and Secretary of Sequoia Residential Funding,Inc., a Delaware corporation, hereby certify that:     1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K/A, and all reports on Form 8-K containingdistribution or servicing reports filed in respect of the Certificates for periods included in theyear covered by this annual report, of Sequoia Residential Funding, Inc.;     2. Based on my knowledge, the information in these reports, taken as a whole, does not containany untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make thestatements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, notmisleading as of the last day of the period covered by this annual report;     3. Based on my knowledge, the distribution or servicing information required to be provided tothe trustee by the servicers under the pooling and servicing agreement, for inclusion in thesereports is included in these reports;     4. Based on my knowledge and upon the annual compliance statement included in the report andrequired to be delivered to the trustee in accordance with the terms of the pooling and servicingagreement, and except as disclosed in the reports, the servicers have fulfilled their obligationsin all material respects under the servicing agreements; and     5. The reports disclose all significant deficiencies relating to the servicers’ compliancewith the minimum servicing standards based upon the report provided by an independent publicaccountant, after conducting a review in compliance with the Uniform Attestation Program forMortgage Bankers or similar procedure, as set forth in the pooling and servicing agreement, that isincluded in these reports.     In giving the certifications above, I have reasonably relied on information provided to me bythe following unaffiliated parties: Morgan Stanley Credit Corporation (formerly known as MorganStanley Dean Witter Credit Corporation), as Servicer, GreenPoint Mortgage Funding, Inc., asServicer, PHH Mortgage Corporation (formerly Cendant Mortgage Corporation), as Servicer, Bank ofAmerica, N.A., as Servicer, GMAC Mortgage Corporation, as Servicer, Residential FundingCorporation, as Servicer, and National City Mortgage Co., as Servicer.Date: May31, 2006   /s/ Harold F. Zagunis Signature  Name: Harold F. Zagunis  Title: Chief Financial Officer and Secretary
FILED

DALLAS COUNTY

12/8/2015 4:42:45 PM

FELICIA PITRE

DISTRICT CLERK

Bridgette Vation

ACCEPTED

05-15-01499-CV

FIFTH COURT OF APPEALS

DALLAS, TEXAS

12/9/2015 10:02:10 AM

LISA MATZ

CLERK

05-15-01499-CV

 RECEIVED IN 5th COURT OF APPEALS DALLAS, TEXAS 12/9/2015 10:02:10 AM LISA MATZ Clerk
(No. 6931

#### Rendel’s, Inc., Claimant, *vs.*State of Illinois, Department of Transportation, Respondent.

*Opinion filed May 8, 1973.*

Rendel’s, Inc., Claimant, pro se.

William J. Scott, Attorney General; Saul R. Wexler, Assistant Attorney General, for Respondent.

Per Curiam.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY ELEV

 123.32

 123.76

 123.57

 123.95

 123.85

 123.49

 123.47

 123.27

 123.23

 123.64

 123.46

 123.13

 123.02

 122.77

 123.44

 123.26

 123.04

 123.17

 123.27

 123.86

 123.37

 121.99

 123.10

 122.93

 123.23

 123.41

 123.48

 123.61

 123.62

 122.85

 123.66

 7,941

 8,148

 8,059

 8,238

 8,191

 8,021

 8,012

 7,918

 7,899

 8,092

 8,007

 7,852

 7,800

 7,688

 7,998

 7,913

 7,810

 7,871

 7,918

 8,195

 7,965

 7,337

 7,838

 7,760

 7,899

 7,984

 8,017

 8,078

 8,082

 7,724

 8,101

STORAGE

-174

+207

-89

+179

-47

-170

-9

-94

-19

+193

-85

-155

-52

-112

+310

-85

-103

+61

+47

+277

-230

-628

+501

-78

+139

+85

+33

+61

+4

-358

+377

CHANGE

1,649

1,827

1,560

1,632

1,523

1,452

1,582

1,529

1,538

1,654

1,559

1,482

1,534

1,505

1,679

1,532

1,498

1,610

1,581

1,727

1,458

1,246

1,893

1,528

1,633

1,611

1,583

1,579

1,551

1,379

1,749

INFLOW

 1,629

 1,614

 1,497

 1,433

 1,438

 1,429

 1,479

 1,468

 1,442

 1,454

 1,497

 1,452

 1,452

 1,454

 1,417

 1,466

 1,441

 1,470

 1,449

 1,479

 1,466

 1,456

 1,531

 1,460

 1,456

 1,461

 1,458

 1,440

 1,441

 1,460

 1,462

POWER

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

SPILL

 60

 60

 60

 60

 60

 60

 60

 60

 60

 60

 60

 60

 60

 60

 59

 60

 60

 60

 60

 60

 60

 60

 60

 60

 60

 60

 60

 60

 60

 58

 60

HATCHERY

 3

 4

 3

 4

 4

 4

 3

 3

 3

 3

 2

 3

 3

 2

 3

 4

 4

 4

 3

 3

 3

 2

 2

 2

 2

 2

 3

 3

 3

 2

 2

C.F.S.

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

AUGUST 2001 LAKE NATOMA DAILY OPERATIONS RUN DATE: September 20, 2001

IN LAKE

EVAP

C.F.S.

COMPUTED*

ACRE-FEET

RELEASE - C.F.S.

TOTALS -14 48,863 45,551 0 1,857 91

ACRE-FEET -14 96,920 90,350 0 3,683 180

COMMENTS:

* COMPUTED INFLOW IS THE SUM OF CHANGE IN STORAGE, RELEASES AND EVAPORATION.

SUMMARY

RELEASES (ACRE-FEET)

POWER 90,350

SPILL 0

FOLSOM SOUTH CANAL

HATCHERY

 2,719

 3,683

 8,115

FOLSOM

SOUTH 

CANAL

 45

 45

 45

 45

 45

 45

 45

 45

 43

 40

 43

 45

 45

 45

 44

 45

 45

 45

 45

 45

 45

 45

 47

 45

 45

 45

 45

 45

 45

 39

 35

 1,371

 2,719

(1)

(1) INCHES OF EVAPORATION TAKEN FROM FOLSOM PAN.

RELEASES (ACRE-FEET)

TOTAL 96,752

Table 12
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

______________________________

MOHAMMED AL-ADAHI, et al., :

:

Petitioners, :

:

v. : Civil Action No. 05-280 (GK) 

 :

GEORGE W. BUSH, et al., :

:

Respondents. :

______________________________:

ORDER

A Status Conference was held in this case on January 13, 2009,

most of which was open to the public, and part of which was closed

due to discussion of classified information. Upon consideration of

the representations of the parties, and the entire record herein,

it is hereby

ORDERED, that parties are to submit any briefing in support of

their view of the appropriate definition of “enemy combatant” by

January 21, 2009; and it is further

ORDERED, that Respondents must meet at least those discovery

obligations articulated in Judge Hogan’s Case Management Order

[#195; amended #219] by January 21, 2009; and it is further

ORDERED, that within one week of the date of this Order,

Petitioners shall provide Respondents with a realistic list that

prioritizes those factual issues which Petitioners request to be

de-classified. Within one week of receiving that list, Respondents
-2-

will inform Petitioners as to whether those requests can be

satisfied; and it is further

ORDERED, that within one week of the date of this Order,

Petitioners shall provide Respondents with a realistic list that

prioritizes the exculpatory evidence they are requesting. By

January 30, 2009, Respondents will inform Petitioners as to whether

those requests can be satisfied; and it is further 

ORDERED, that Petitioners’ opposition to Respondents’ Motion

to Clarify, Reconsider, or Amend Three Case Management Order

Provisions and to Stay Those Obligations Pending Resolution of This

Motion and Any Appeal, if any, is due by January 26, 2009, at 5:00

p.m., and shall not exceed 27 pages (fewer pages would be

appreciated). Respondents’ reply is due by February 3, 2009, at

5:00 p.m., and is not to exceed 10 pages; and it is further

ORDERED, that parties’ motions on the admission of hearsay

evidence are due by January 30, 2009; and it is further

ORDERED, that Respondents shall provide to Petitioners by

January 19, 2009 those medical records that they are obligated to

turn over under the Court’s October 26, 2005 Order in connection

with the forced feeding of Petitioner Hamdoun; and it is further

ORDERED, that, on January 26, 2009, at 2:00 p.m., there will

be a Hearing regarding the Renewed Emergency Motion for Injunction

Against Further Torture of Mohammed Bawazir. By January 22, 2009,

Respondents shall file before the Court an affidavit from the

official responsible for Guantanamo Bay’s compliance with the
-3-

Court’s October 26, 2005 Order regarding forced feeding. The

affidavit may be filed along with Respondents’ full opposition to

the Motion. Respondents should prepare to have the affiant

available for telephonic testimony during the Hearing; and it is

further

ORDERED, that the parties shall file a Joint Report on

discovery no later than February 12, 2009 at 4:00 p.m.

 /s/ 

January 14, 2009 Gladys Kessler

United States District Judge

Copies to: Attorneys of Record via ECF
### §85. Concessions

#### (a) Authorization; use of proceeds for research and educational work

The Board of Regents of the Smithsonian Institution, in furtherance of the mission of the National Zoological Park to provide for the advancement of science and instruction and recreation of the people, is authorized to negotiate agreements granting concessions at the National Zoological Park to nonprofit scientific, educational, or historic organizations. The net proceeds of such organizations gained from such concessions granted under this subsection shall be used exclusively for research and educational work for the benefit of the National Zoological Park.

#### (b) Voluntary services

The Smithsonian Institution is authorized to accept the voluntary services of such organizations, and the voluntary services of individuals, for the benefit of the National Zoological Park.

(Pub. L. 89–772, Nov. 6, 1966, 80 Stat. 1322.)
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except

under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

August 10, 2005

Charles R. Fulbruge III

Clerk

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 04-40162

Conference Calendar

 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

SERGIO ARTURO ROSALES,

Defendant-Appellant.

--------------------

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Texas

USDC No. 5:03-CR-1379-1

--------------------

ON REMAND FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES

Before KING, Chief Judge, and DeMOSS and CLEMENT, Circuit Judges. 

PER CURIAM:*

This court affirmed the judgment of conviction and sentence

of Sergio Arturo Rosales. United States v. Rosales, No. 04-40162

(5th Cir. Dec. 17, 2004) (unpublished). The Supreme Court

vacated and remanded for further consideration in light of United

States v. Booker, 125 S. Ct. 738 (2005). See De La Cruz-Gonzalez

v. United States, 125 S. Ct. 1995 (2005). We requested and
No. 04-40162

-2-

received supplemental letter briefs addressing the impact of

Booker. 

Rosales argues that he is entitled to resentencing because

the district court sentenced him under a mandatory application of

the United States Sentencing Guidelines prohibited by Booker. 

However, he identifies “no evidence in the record suggesting that

the district court would have imposed a lesser sentence under an

advisory guidelines system.” United States v. Taylor, 409 F.3d

675, 677 (5th Cir. 2005). 

Rosales concedes that he cannot make the necessary showing

of plain error that is required by our precedent. Furthermore,

he correctly acknowledges that this court has rejected the

argument that a Booker error is a structural error or that such

error is presumed to be prejudicial. See United States v. Mares,

402 F.3d 511, 520-22 (5th Cir. 2005), petition for cert. filed

(Mar. 31, 2005) (No. 04-9517); see also United States v.

Malveaux, 411 F.3d 558, 561 n.9 (5th Cir. 2005), petition for

cert. filed (July 11, 2005) (No. 5297). He desires to preserve

this argument for further review.

Because nothing in the Supreme Court’s Booker decision

requires us to change our prior affirmance in this case, we

therefore reinstate our judgment affirming Rosales’s conviction

and sentence.

AFFIRMED.
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of MagnaChip Semiconductor LLC (the Company) on
Form 10-K for the period ending December 31, 2005, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Youm Huh, Chief Executive Officer and President of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:

(1) The Report
fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                                              
|----------------------------------------------
|/s/    YOUM
HUH                               
|Youm Huh Chief Executive Officer and President

March 31, 2006
EXHIBIT 23


                CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS


We consent to the incorporation by reference in the registration statements of
Miller Building Systems, Inc. on Form S-3 (File No.333-60747 and Form S-8
(File No. 33-88158 and 33-50512), and in the related Prospectus, of our report
dated July 30, 1999, (except as to the information presented in Notes C and J
for which the date is August 20, 1999), on our audits of the consolidated
financial statements and financial statement schedule of Miller Building
Systems, Inc. and subsidiaries as of July 3, 1999 and June 27, 1998, and for
each of the three fiscal years in the period ended July 3, 1999, which report
is included in this Annual Report on Form 10-K.



                                   PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP



South Bend, Indiana
September 17, 1999
### §2292d. Repealed. Pub. L. 95–424, title VI, §604, Oct. 6, 1978, 92 Stat. 961

Section, Pub. L. 87–195, pt. I, §494A, formerly pt. III, §639A, as added Pub. L. 93–189, §20, Dec. 17, 1973, 87 Stat. 725, amended Pub. L. 93–333, §3(2)–(5), July 8, 1974, 88 Stat. 290; renumbered pt. I, §494A, Pub. L. 94–161, title I, §101(5), Dec. 20, 1975, 89 Stat. 850, related to famine and disaster relief to drought-stricken African nations.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date of Repeal

Repeal effective Oct. 1, 1978, see section 605 of Pub. L. 95–424, set out as an Effective Date of 1978 Amendment note under section 2151 of this title.

#### Assistance in Controlling Locust Plagues in Africa; Authorization of Appropriations

Pub. L. 95–424, title I, §120, Oct. 6, 1978, 92 Stat. 954, provided that: "In order to assist in attempts to control locust plagues in Africa, especially in the Horn of Africa, there is authorized to be appropriated to the President, in addition to amounts otherwise authorized for disaster relief purposes, $2,000,000, which amount is authorized to remain available until expended."
Editorial Note on Part 416
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 416 appear at 68 FR 53509, Sept. 11, 2003.

§ 416.1415 Disability hearing—disability hearing officers. ( a ) *General.* Your disability hearing will be conducted by a disability hearing officer who was not involved in making the determination you are appealing. The disability hearing officer will be an experienced disability examiner, regardless of whether he or she is appointed by a State agency or by the Associate Commissioner for Disability Determinations or his or her delegate, as described in paragraphs (b) and (c) of this section.
( b ) *State agency hearing officers* — ( 1 ) *Appointment of State agency hearing officers.* If a State agency made the initial or revised determination that you are appealing, the disability hearing officer who conducts your disability hearing may be appointed by a State agency. If the disability hearing officer is appointed by a State agency, that individual will be employed by an adjudicatory unit of the State agency other than the adjudicatory unit which made the determination you are appealing.
( 2 ) *State agency defined.* For purposes of this subpart, *State agency* means the adjudicatory component in the State which issues disability determinations.
( c ) *Federal hearing officers.* The disability hearing officer who conducts your disability hearing will be appointed by the Associate Commissioner for Disability Determinations or his or her delegate if: ( 1 ) A component of our office other than a State agency made the determination you are appealing; or
( 2 ) The State agency does not appoint a disability hearing officer to conduct your disability hearing under paragraph (b) of this section.
[51 FR 305, Jan. 3, 1986, as amended at 71 FR 10432, Mar. 1, 2006]