alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>   1
 
<TABLE>
<S>                                  <C>
                                     ----------------------------------------------------------
                                     Suite 900                        Telephone: (313) 396-3000
                                     600 Renaissance Center
LOGO                                 Detroit, Michigan 48243-1704
</TABLE>
 
                                                                      EXHIBIT 23
 
INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' CONSENT
 
     We consent to the incorporation by reference of our report dated January
21, 1997, appearing in this Annual Report on Form 10-K of Chrysler Corporation
for the year ended December 31, 1996, in the following Registration Statements:
 
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
         REGISTRATION
FORM     STATEMENT NO.                                 DESCRIPTION
----     -------------                                 -----------      
<C>     <C>                 <S>
S-8         33-5588         Chrysler Salaried Employees' Savings Plan
S-8         33-6117         Chrysler Corporation Stock Option Plan
S-3         33-13739        Chrysler Corporation Common Stock deliverable to Selling
                            stockholder
                            named therein
S-3         33-15716        Chrysler Corporation Common Stock deliverable to Selling
                            stockholders named therein
S-8         33-15544        Chrysler Corporation Common Stock deliverable pursuant to the 1972
        (Post-Effective     and 1980 American Motors Corporation Stock Option Plans
        Amendment No. 1)
S-3         33-15849        Chrysler Corporation Debt Securities
S-3         33-22233        Chrysler Corporation Common Stock deliverable to Selling
                            stockholders named therein
S-3         33-39688        Chrysler Corporation Common Stock deliverable to Selling
                            stockholder named therein
S-8         33-47986        Chrysler Corporation 1991 Stock Compensation Plan
S-3         33-59294        Chrysler Corporation Common Stock deliverable to Selling
                            stockholder named therein
S-8         33-55817        Chrysler Corporation 1991 Stock Compensation Plan
</TABLE>
 
DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP
 
January 21, 1997
 
LOGO
Exhibit 99.1
 NEWS RELEASE
    
    (ARCADIA HEALTHCARE LOGO)
 Arcadia Resources Announces Receipt of NYSE Amex
Notice of Non-Compliance with Continued Listing Standards
 SM
   About Arcadia HealthCare




---



##### 



Forward Looking Statements
  Contact:    mmiddendorf@arcadiahealthcare.com
### Part II—Foreign Service Pension System
(No. 6543

#### A-1 Ambulance Service, Inc., Claimant, *vs.*State of Illinois, Department of Mental Health, Respondent.

*Opinion filed November 13, 1972.*

A-1 Ambulance Service, Inc., Claimant, pro se.

William J. Scott, Attorney General; Saul R. Wexler, Assistant Attorney General, for Respondent.

*116Per Curiam.
H. R. 4056 

One Hundred Fourteenth Congress 

of the 

United States of America 

AT THE SECOND SESSION 

Begun and held at the City of Washington on Monday, 

the fourth day of January, two thousand and sixteen 

An Act 

To direct the Secretary of Veterans Affairs to convey to the Florida Department 

of Veterans Affairs all right, title, and interest of the United States to the 

property known as ‘‘The Community Living Center’’ at the Lake Baldwin Veterans 

Affairs Outpatient Clinic, Orlando, Florida. 

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of 

the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

SECTION 1. DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS LAND CONVEYANCE, 

LAKE BALDWIN VETERANS AFFAIRS OUTPATIENT 

CLINIC, ORLANDO, FLORIDA. 

(a) CONVEYANCE AUTHORIZED.—The Secretary of Veterans 

Affairs shall convey to the Florida Department of Veterans Affairs 

all right, title, and interest of the United States in and to the 

property known as ‘‘The Community Living Center’’, including any 

improvements thereon, which is part of the Lake Baldwin Veterans 

Affairs Outpatient Clinic, Orlando, Florida, located at 5201 Raymond Street, Orlando, Florida. 

(b) CONDITIONS OF CONVEYANCE.—The conveyance under subsection (a) shall be subject to the following conditions: 

(1) The recipient shall agree to accept the conveyed real 

property in its condition at the time of the conveyance. 

(2) The recipient shall agree not to apply the small house 

design model of the Department of Veterans Affairs Office 

of Construction and Facilities Management Design Guide for 

Community Living Centers to the conveyed real property. 

(c) USE OF PROPERTY.—The deed of conveyance for the parcels 

of real property conveyed under subsection (a) shall provide that 

all of the property be used and maintained for the sole purpose 

of providing nursing home, domiciliary, or adult day health care 

to veterans. 

(d) DESCRIPTION OF PROPERTY.—The exact acreage and legal 

description of the parcels of real property conveyed under subsection 

(a) shall be determined by surveys satisfactory to the Secretary. 

(e) ADDITIONAL TERMS AND CONDITIONS.—The Secretary may 

require such additional terms and conditions in connection with 
H. R. 4056—2 

the conveyances under subsection (a) as the Secretary considers 

appropriate to protect the interests of the United States. 

Speaker of the House of Representatives. 

Vice President of the United States and

President of the Senate.
#### Sylvester J. Liebermann, Appellant, v. Sol Tekulsky, as Executor of Carrie G. Tekulsky, Deceased, Respondent.

Judgment unanimously affirmed, with costs. No opinion. Present — Peck, P. J., Glennon, Dore, Cohn and Van Voorhis, JJ. [See *post,*p. 1007.]
### §2194a. Omitted

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section, Pub. L. 97–65, §5(b)(2), Oct. 16, 1981, 95 Stat. 1023, which related to contract authority of the Overseas Private Investment Corporation, was omitted from the Code as obsolete pursuant to the termination of the Corporation by section 9684 of this title.
#### § 404.1517 Consultative examination at our expense.

If your medical sources cannot or will not give us sufficient medical evidence about your impairment for us to determine whether you are disabled or blind, we may ask you to have one or more physical or mental examinations or tests. We will pay for these examinations. However, we will not pay for any medical examination arranged by you or your representative without our advance approval. If we arrange for the examination or test, we will give you reasonable notice of the date, time, and place the examination or test will be given, and the name of the person or facility who will do it. We will also give the examiner any necessary background information about your condition.

[56 FR 36956, Aug. 1, 1991]
### §2430e. Interest on new obligations

#### (a) Rate of interest

New obligations issued by a beneficiary country pursuant to section 2430c(b) of this title shall bear interest at a concessional rate.

#### (b) Currency of payment; deposits

#### (1) Local currency

If the beneficiary country has entered into an Americas Framework Agreement, interest shall be paid in the local currency of the beneficiary country and deposited in an Americas Fund. Such interest shall be the property of the beneficiary country, until such time as it is disbursed pursuant to section 2430f(d) of this title. Such local currencies shall be used for the purposes specified in the Americas Framework Agreement.

#### (2) United States dollars

If the beneficiary country has not entered into an Americas Framework Agreement, interest shall be paid in United States dollars and deposited in the United States Government account established for interest payments of the obligations for which the new obligations were exchanged.

#### (c) Interest already paid

If a beneficiary country enters into an Americas Framework Agreement subsequent to the date on which interest first became due on the newly issued obligation, any interest already paid on such new obligation shall not be redeposited into the Americas Fund established for that country.

(Pub. L. 87–195, pt. IV, §706, as added Pub. L. 102–549, title VI, §602(a), Oct. 28, 1992, 106 Stat. 3666.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Prior Provisions

A prior section 706 of Pub. L. 87–195, pt. IV, Sept. 4, 1961, 75 Stat. 463, enacted section 1945 of this title, prior to repeal by Pub. L. 87–565, pt. IV, §401, Aug. 1, 1962, 76 Stat. 263, except insofar as section 706 affected section 1945.
# C_2012131EN.01000601.xml

| 5.5.2012 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 131/6 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

5.5.2012

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 131/6

---

Notice concerning a request under Article 30 of Directive 2004/17/EC

Request from a contracting entity

2012/C 131/07

On 29 March 2012, the Commission received a request under Article 30(5) of Directive 2004/17/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 31 March 2004 coordinating the procurement procedures of entities operating in the water, energy, transport and postal services sectors. The first working day following receipt of the request was 30 March 2012.

This request, from EniPower SpA, concerns the production and sale of electricity in Italy. The abovementioned Article 30 provides that Directive 2004/17/EC is not applicable when the activity in question is directly exposed to competition on markets to which access is not restricted. These conditions are evaluated solely for the purposes of Directive 2004/17/EC and are without prejudice to the application of competition rules.

The Commission has a period of three months commencing on the working day referred to above to reach a decision on this request. The period therefore ends on 2 July 2012.

This period may be extended by three months. Any such extension must be published.

Pursuant to the second subparagraph of Article 30(6), further requests concerning the production and sale of electricity in Italy submitted before the expiry of the period opened in respect of this request will not be considered as new procedures and will be treated in the context of this request.

---
§ 404.1583 How we determine disability for blind persons who are age 55 or older. We will find that you are eligible for disability insurance benefits even though you are still engaging in substantial gainful activity, if— ( a ) You are blind;
( b ) You are age 55 or older; and
( c ) You are unable to use the skills or abilities like the ones you used in any substantial gainful activity which you did regularly and for a substantial period of time. (However, you will not be paid any cash benefits for any month in which you are doing substantial gainful activity.)
### §1606. Subsequent impleader of dismissed biomaterials supplier

#### (a) Impleading of dismissed defendant

A court, upon motion by a manufacturer or a claimant within 90 days after entry of a final judgment in an action by the claimant against a manufacturer, and notwithstanding any otherwise applicable statute of limitations, may implead a biomaterials supplier who has been dismissed from the action pursuant to this chapter if—

(1) the manufacturer has made an assertion, either in a motion or other pleading filed with the court or in an opening or closing statement at trial, or as part of a claim for contribution or indemnification, and the court finds based on the court's independent review of the evidence contained in the record of the action, that under applicable law—

(A) the negligence or intentionally tortious conduct of the dismissed supplier was an actual and proximate cause of the harm to the claimant; and

(B) the manufacturer's liability for damages should be reduced in whole or in part because of such negligence or intentionally tortious conduct; or

(2) the claimant has moved to implead the supplier and the court finds, based on the court's independent review of the evidence contained in the record of the action, that under applicable law—

(A) the negligence or intentionally tortious conduct of the dismissed supplier was an actual and proximate cause of the harm to the claimant; and

(B) the claimant is unlikely to be able to recover the full amount of its damages from the remaining defendants.

#### (b) Standard of liability

Notwithstanding any preliminary finding under subsection (a), a biomaterials supplier who has been impleaded into an action covered by this chapter, as provided for in this section—

(1) may, prior to entry of judgment on the claim against it, supplement the record of the proceeding that was developed prior to the grant of the motion for impleader under subsection (a); and

(2) may be found liable to a manufacturer or a claimant only to the extent required and permitted by any applicable State or Federal law other than this chapter.

#### (c) Discovery

Nothing in this section shall give a claimant or any other party the right to obtain discovery from a biomaterials supplier at any time prior to grant of a motion for impleader beyond that allowed under section 1605 of this title.

(Pub. L. 105–230, §7, Aug. 13, 1998, 112 Stat. 1528.)

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date

Section applicable to all civil actions covered under this chapter commenced on or after Aug. 13, 1998, including any in which the harm or harmful conduct occurred before such date, see section 8 of Pub. L. 105–230, set out as a note under section 1601 of this title.
<partyblock><br><br><div align="center"><b><font size="+1">Nancy Huebner, Appellant, <br><br>against<br><br>Cheryl Fitzsimmons, Respondent.</font></b></div><br><br><p>Appeal from a judgment of the District Court of Suffolk County, Sixth District (Linda J. Kevins, J.), entered April 24, 2015. The judgment, upon the court's sua sponte determination, dismissed the action.</p><p>ORDERED that the judgment is reversed, without costs, and the matter is remitted to the District Court for a trial.</p><p>In this small claims action, plaintiff stated on the small claims complaint form that, on July 15, 2013, she had been served with an order of protection which falsely accused her of harassment and possession of a weapon, and that, as a result, she sought to recover the $2,090 that she had incurred in legal fees. Both parties appeared for trial. Before any testimony was given, or any documents or stipulated facts submitted (<i>see</i> CPLR 3222), the District Court, after reading the small claims complaint form, dismissed the action upon a finding that plaintiff had failed to state a cause of action.</p><p>In a small claims action, our review is limited to a determination of whether "substantial justice has . . . been done between the parties according to the rules and principles of substantive law" (UDCA 1807; <i>see</i> UDCA 1804; <i>Ross v Friedman</i>, 269 AD2d 584 [2000]; <i>Williams v Roper</i>, 269 AD2d 125 [2000]). In the small claims context, the rules of pleading and procedure are relaxed (<i>see</i> UDCA 1803 [a]; 1804). Affording plaintiff the benefit of every possible inference (<i>see</i> CPLR 3026; <i>see also Leon v Martinez</i>, 84 NY2d 83, 87-88 [1994]), it appears that plaintiff may have intended to state a cause of action for either malicious prosecution or abuse of process, for which causes of action legal expenses may be claimed as damages (<i>see Parkin v Cornell Univ.</i>, 78 NY2d 523, 529 [1991]; <a href="../2011/2011_21229.htm" target="_blank"><i>Cooper v Lathillerie</i>, 33 Misc 3d 1</a>, 3 [App Term, 2d Dept, 9th &amp; 10th Jud Dists 2011]).</p><p>In view of the foregoing, we are unable to ascertain the basis for the District Court's determination that plaintiff had failed to state a cause of action. Since there was neither testimony nor submission of stipulated facts (<i>see</i> CPLR 3222) to support that conclusion, the judgment failed to render substantial justice and cannot stand (<a href="../2015/2015_51749.htm" target="_blank"><i>see Beath v Greyrock Park Prop. Owners' Assn., Inc.</i>, 49 Misc 3d 150</a>[A], 2015 NY Slip Op 51749[U] [App Term, 2d Dept, 9th &amp; 10th Jud Dists 2015]).</p><p>We note that we do not consider any materials that are dehors the record.</p><p>Accordingly, the judgment is reversed and the matter is remitted to the District Court for a trial.</p><p>Marano, P.J., Iannacci and Garguilo, JJ., concur.</p><br>Decision Date: January 06, 2017<br><br><div align="center"><form method="LINK" action="../../slipidx/at_2_idxtable.shtml"><input type="submit" value="Return to Decision List"></form></div></partyblock>
IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS

OF TEXAS

NO. WR-94,714-01

EX PARTE DEREK STEVE BANKS, Applicant

ON APPLICATION FOR A WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS

CAUSE NO. 18-2491-K26 A IN THE 26TH DISTRICT COURT

FROM WILLIAMSON COUNTY

Per curiam. SLAUGHTER, J. filed a concurring opinion.

O P I N I O N

Applicant was convicted of aggravated assault of a child and sentenced to 70 years’

imprisonment. He filed this application for a writ of habeas corpus in the county of conviction, and

the district clerk forwarded it to this Court. See TEX. CODE CRIM. PROC. art. 11.07.

Applicant contends that he was denied his right to an appeal through no fault of his own.

Based on the record after remand, the trial court finds that defense counsel’s usual practice of filing

a motion for new trial and a motion to withdraw, with the expectation that the trial court would

appoint appellate counsel to timely file a notice of appeal, was within the acceptable standard of

practice before the court. In this case, however, counsel’s practice broke down. The court states that

Applicant lost his opportunity to appeal due to a misunderstanding of the electronic filing process.
2

The trial court concludes that Applicant desired to appeal his conviction and sentence but was denied

the right to appeal through no fault of his own.

Relief is granted. Ex parte Riley, 193 S.W.3d 900, 902 (Tex. Crim. App. 2006). Applicant

mayfile an out-of-time appeal of his conviction in cause number 18-2491-K26 from the 26th District

Court of Williamson County. It appears that Applicant is represented by counsel. If Applicant is not

represented by counsel, then within ten days from the date of this Court’s mandate the trial court

shall determine whether Applicant is indigent. If Applicant is indigent and wants to be represented

by counsel, the trial court shall appoint counsel to represent him on direct appeal. Should Applicant

decide to appeal, he must file a written notice of appeal in the trial court within thirty days from the

date of this Court’s mandate.

Copies of this opinion shall be sent to the Texas Department ofCriminalJustice–Correctional

Institutions Division and the Board of Pardons and Paroles. 

Delivered: October 25, 2023

Do not publish
§ 404.2116 When claims for payment for VR services must be made (filing deadlines). The State VR agency must file a claim for payment in each individual case within the following time periods: ( a ) A claim for payment for VR services based on the individual's completion of a continuous 9-month period of SGA must be filed within 12 months after the month in which the continuous 9-month period of SGA is completed.
( b ) A claim for payment for VR services provided to an individual whose disability benefits were continued after disability has ceased because of that individual's continued participation in a VR program must be filed as follows: ( 1 ) If a written notice requesting that a claim be filed was sent to the State VR agency, a claim must be filed within 90 days following the month in which VR services end, or if later, within 90 days after receipt of the notice.
( 2 ) If no written notice was sent to the State VR agency, a claim must be filed within 12 months after the month in which VR services end.
[55 FR 8455, Mar. 8, 1990, as amended at 61 FR 31025, June 19, 1996; 68 FR 40124, July 7, 2003; 83 FR 62457, Dec. 4, 2018]
```

[Congressional Bills 114th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 4006 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

114th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 4006

To provide the public with access to the laws of the United States, and 
                          for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           November 16, 2015

 Mr. Brat (for himself and Mr. Moulton) introduced the following bill; 
  which was referred to the Committee on House Administration, and in 
  addition to the Committee on Oversight and Government Reform, for a 
 period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for 
consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the 
                          committee concerned

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To provide the public with access to the laws of the United States, and 
                          for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Statutes at Large Modernization 
Act''.

SEC. 2. PUBLIC ACCESS TO THE LAWS OF THE UNITED STATES.

    (a) Archivist Requirement To Make Laws Available.--Section 112 of 
title 1, United States Code, is amended by adding at the end the 
following new sentence: ``The Archivist shall make available anything 
compiled, edited, indexed, and published under this section to the 
public at no cost on a website in a searchable, non-proprietary format. 
The Archivist shall ensure that the searchable online edition of the 
United States Statutes at Large is prepared in consultation and 
coordination with entities that develop formatting conventions used for 
enrolled bills and other legislative materials, which may include the 
Library of Congress, the Office of the Clerk of the House, the Office 
of the Secretary of the Senate, the Office of the Legislative Counsel 
of the House of Representatives and the Senate, the Office of the Law 
Revision Council, the Congressional Research Service, the Government 
Publishing Office, and such other entities that the Archivist considers 
appropriate.''
    (b) Librarian of Congress Requirement To Incorporate Searchable 
Statutes at Large Into Legislative Information Retrieval System.--
Section 209 of the Legislative Branch Appropriations Act, 1996 (2 
U.S.C. 180) is amended by adding at the end the following new 
subsection:
    ``(f) In addition to the legislative information described in 
subsection (b), the relevant electronic information made available 
under section 112 of title 1, United States Code, shall be incorporated 
into the legislative information service to the extent practicable.''.
    (c) Authorization of Appropriations.--There is authorized to be 
appropriated $5,000,000 for each of fiscal years 2016 through 2020 to 
carry out the provisions of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
(No. 5930

#### William Karp, Claimant, *vs.*State of Illinois, Commission on Technological Progress, Respondent.

*Opinion filed January 31, 1974.*

Leon M. Despres and Albert Schwartz, Attorneys for Claimant.

*214William J. Scott, Attorney General; Saul R. Wexler, Assistant Attorney General, for Respondent.

Per Curiam.
EXHIBIT 21.1

SUBSIDIARIES OF BLACKROCK CAPITAL INVESTMENT CORPORATION



|                      |  |              |          | 
|--------------------- |  | ------------ | -------- | 
|Name                  |  | Jurisdiction |         
|BKC ARS Blocker, Inc. |  |              | Delaware | 
|BKC ASW Blocker, Inc. |  |              | Delaware | 
|BCIC-MBS, LLC         |  |              | Delaware | 

In addition, we may be deemed to control certain portfolio companies identified as Controlled
Investments in footnotes to the Consolidated Schedule of Investments at December 31, 2015 included in the Consolidated Financial Statements portion of BlackRock Capital Investment Corporations Form 10-K for the year ended
December 31, 2015.