alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
(No. 6669

#### Ozark Air Lines, Inc., Claimant, *vs.*State of Illinois, Department of Children and Family Services, Respondent.

*Opinion filed July 19, 1973.*

Ozark Air Lines, Inc., Claimant, pro se.

William J. Scott, Attorney General; Douglas G. Olson, Assistant Attorney General, for Respondent.

Per Curiam.
### SUBCHAPTER II—ADDITIONAL MEASURES RELATING TO SANCTIONS AGAINST IRAN
### §3427. Coordinator for the outlying areas

#### (a) Establishment

The Secretary shall designate an office of the Department to coordinate the activities of the Department as they relate to the outlying areas.

#### (b) Appointment

Not later than 90 days after January 8, 2002, the head of the office designated under subsection (a) shall appoint a coordinator for the outlying areas, who shall be a person with substantial experience in the operation of Federal programs in the outlying areas.

#### (c) Duties

The coordinator for the outlying areas shall—

(1) serve as the principal advisor to the Department on Federal matters affecting the outlying areas;

(2) evaluate, on a periodic basis, the needs of education programs in the outlying areas;

(3) assist with the coordination of programs that serve the outlying areas; and

(4) provide guidance to programs within the Department that serve the outlying areas.

#### (d) Outlying areas defined

As used in this section, the term "outlying areas" includes Guam, the Virgin Islands, American Samoa, and the Commonwealth of the Northern Marianas Islands, but does not include the freely associated states of the Republic of the Marshall Islands, the Federated States of Micronesia, and the Republic of Palau.

(Pub. L. 96–88, title II, §220, as added Pub. L. 107–110, title X, §1072(a), Jan. 8, 2002, 115 Stat. 2088.)

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date

Section effective Jan. 8, 2002, except with respect to certain noncompetitive programs and competitive programs, see section 5 of Pub. L. 107–110, set out as a note under section 6301 of this title.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

EASTERN DISTRICT

COLLEEN SCHRADER, PERSONAL

REPRESENTATIVE OF THE ESTATE OF ERNEST SCHRADER, DECEASED, AND

INDIVIDUALLY AS WIDOW IN HER OWN RIGHT,

Respondent

v.

AMERON INTERNATIONAL CORPORATION,

Petitioner :

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

: No. 234 EAL 2020

Petition for Allowance of Appeal from the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW , this 29th day of December, 2020

, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal

is DENIED

.
Exhibit 10.15
 THE CHEFS WAREHOUSE, INC.
NON-QUALIFIED STOCK OPTION AGREEMENT
(Directors)
 THIS NON-QUALIFIED STOCK OPTION AGREEMENT
 WHEREAS
 WHEREAS
 NOW, THEREFORE
 Grant of Option
 Section 3
  Exercise of Option




---



##### 



Manner of Exercise
 Termination of Option
 Termination for Cause
 Other Termination
 No Right to Continued Service
 Adjustment to Option Stock Section 4.2




---



##### 



Amendments to Option
 Limited Transferability
 Reservation of Shares
 Plan Governs
 Severability
 Notices




---



##### 



To the Company:
    
    The Chefs Warehouse, Inc.
100 East Ridge Road
Ridgefield, Connecticut 06877To the Optionee:
    
    The address then maintained with respect to the Optionee in the
Companys records.
 Governing Law
 Resolution of Disputes
 Successors in Interest
 [The next page is the signature page]




---



##### 



IN WITNESS WHEREOF,
 THE CHEFS WAREHOUSE, INC.By:OPTIONEE:Signature
### §2430f. Enterprise for the Americas Funds

#### (a) Establishment

Each beneficiary country that enters into an Americas Framework Agreement shall be required to establish an Enterprise for the Americas Fund to receive payments in local currency pursuant to section 2430e(b)(1) of this title.

#### (b) Deposits

Local currencies deposited in an Americas Fund shall not be considered assistance for purposes of any provision of law limiting assistance to a country.

#### (c) Investment

Deposits made in an Americas Fund shall be invested until disbursed. Any return on such investment may be retained by the Americas Fund, without deposit in the Treasury of the United States and without further appropriation by the Congress.

#### (d) Disbursements

Funds in an Americas Fund shall be disbursed only pursuant to an Americas Framework Agreement.

(Pub. L. 87–195, pt. IV, §707, as added Pub. L. 102–549, title VI, §602(a), Oct. 28, 1992, 106 Stat. 3666.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Prior Provisions

A prior section 707 of Pub. L. 87–195, pt. IV, Sept. 4, 1961, 75 Stat. 464, amended section 1783 of this title, prior to repeal by Pub. L. 87–565, pt. IV, §401, Aug. 1, 1962, 76 Stat. 263, except insofar as section 707 affected section 1783.
CENTRAL VALLEY OPERATIONS OFFICE

CHINOOK SALMON REPORT

October 2007

Note:Bold numbers are not verified by DFG & DWR Preliminary Data - Subject to Change

Winter Run Chinook Salmon Estimated Loss (Incidental Take) Spring Run Chinook Salmon Estimated Loss (Incidental Take) 

Daily SWP Daily CVP Daily Combined Season Combined Daily SWP Daily CVP Daily Combined Season Combined Da

Tagged* No Tag Tagged* No Tag Tagged* No Tag Tagged* No Tag Tagged No Tag Tagged No Tag Tagged No Tag Tagged No Tag I

DATE Estimated Estimated Estimated Estimated Estimated Estimated Estimated Estimated Estimated Estimated Estimated Estimated Estimated Estimated Estimated Estimated

Loss Loss Loss Loss Loss Loss Loss Loss Loss Loss Loss Loss Loss Loss Loss Loss

1-Oct-07 0000 0000 0000 0000 5,115 2-Oct-07 0000 0000 0000 0000 4,606 3-Oct-07 0000 0000 0000 0000 4,142 4-Oct-07 0000 0000 0000 0000 3,274 5-Oct-07 0000 0000 0000 0000 3,431 6-Oct-07 0000 0000 0000 0000 2,872 7-Oct-07 0000 0000 0000 0000 3,264 8-Oct-07 0000 0000 0000 0000 3,259 9-Oct-07 0000 0000 0000 0000 2,862 

10-Oct-07 0000 0000 0000 0000 2,892 11-Oct-07 0000 0000 0000 0000 2,893 12-Oct-07 0000 0000 0000 0000 3,459 13-Oct-07 0000 0000 0000 0000 2,474 

14-Oct-07 0000 0000 0000 0000 4,204 15-Oct-07 0000 0000 0000 0000 4,178 16-Oct-07 0000 0000 0000 0000 3,412 17-Oct-07 0000 0000 0000 0000 2,721 18-Oct-07 0000 0000 0000 0000 3,265 19-Oct-07 0000 0000 0000 0000 3,302 20-Oct-07 0000 0000 0000 0000 2,867 21-Oct-07 0000 0000 0000 0000 3,068 22-Oct-07 0000 0000 0000 0000 3,066 23-Oct-07 0000 0000 0000 0000 2,810 24-Oct-07 0000 0000 0000 0000 2,423 25-Oct-07 0000 0000 0000 0000 2,437 26-Oct-07 0000 0000 0000 0000 2,390 

27-Oct-07 0000 0000 0000 0000 2,394 

28-Oct-07 0000 0000 0000 0000 2,525 

29-Oct-07 0000 0000 0000 0000 2,556 

30-Oct-07 0000 0000 0000 0000 1,856 

31-Oct-07 0000 0000 0000 0000 2,821 

Total 0000 0 0 0 0000 00000 96,839 

Winter Run Incidental Take Levels (Oct 1 thru May 31) Spring Run Incidental Take Levels for Season Combined Total (Oct 1 thru Jun 30)Tagged Yellow Light Level = ??? SeasonTagged Red Light Level = ??? SeasonNo Tag Yellow Light Level = ??? SeasonNo Tag Red Light Level = ??? Season* This number is determined by Winter Run Length only until the tags have been read.

Banks T
**Final Listing of Questionnaire Files for Steam Electric Rulemaking Record**

**Plant ID** 

### 07596 **Removed from Public**  **(Non-CBI) Docket**  **1 Copyright** 

**Flag 2**  **File Name Description**  

### x 07596\07596_Checklist.xls EPA Technical Review Checklist Workbook



### 07596\07596_Completeness_Checklist.xls EPA Completeness Review Checklist 

### 07596\07596_HardcopyLog.doc EPA log of hardcopy documents submitted 

### x 07596\07596_Part A.xls Plant submitted survey file 

### x 07596\07596_Part B.xls Plant submitted survey file 

### x 07596\07596_Part C.xls Plant submitted survey file 

### x 07596\07596_Part D.xls Plant submitted survey file 

### x 07596\07596_Part H.xls Plant submitted survey file



### 07596\Certification Statement Plant ID 07596.pdf Plant certification statement 

### 07596\Supplemental Documents\07596_Martin Lake Plant Area Map-2.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey 

### 07596\Supplemental Documents\07596_Martin Lake Plant Property Map-1.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey 

### x 07596\Supplemental Documents\07596_ML D-1 diagram.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey 

### x 07596\Supplemental Documents\07596_WB-1 MLSES_water balance.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey

1Final reviewed survey responses are located in the Steam Electric Technical Questionnaire Database

. 2Copyright documents are available from the docket.
§ 30.717 When are OWCP's exclusion procedures initiated? ( a ) Upon receipt of information indicating that a physician, hospital or provider of medical services or supplies (hereinafter the provider) has or may have engaged in activities enumerated in paragraphs (c) through (j) of § 30.715, OWCP will forward that information to the Department of Labor's Office of Inspector General (DOL OIG) for its consideration. If the information was provided directly to DOL OIG, DOL OIG will notify OWCP of its receipt and implement the appropriate action within its authority, unless such notification will or may compromise the identity of confidential sources, or compromise or prejudice an ongoing or potential criminal investigation.
( b ) DOL OIG will conduct such action as it deems necessary, and, when appropriate, provide a written report as described in paragraph (c) of this section to OWCP. OWCP will then determine whether to initiate procedures to exclude the provider from participation in the EEOICPA program. If DOL OIG determines not to take any further action, it will promptly notify OWCP of such determination.
( c ) If DOL OIG discovers reasonable cause to believe that violations of § 30.715 have occurred, it shall, when appropriate, prepare a written report, *i.e.,* investigative memorandum, and forward the report along with supporting evidence to OWCP. The report shall be in the form of a single memorandum in narrative form with attachments. ( 1 ) The report should contain all of the following elements: ( i ) A brief description and explanation of the subject provider or providers;
( ii ) A concise statement of the DOL OIG's findings upon which exclusion may be based;
( iii ) A summary of the events that make up the DOL OIG's findings;
( iv ) A discussion of the documentation supporting DOL OIG's findings;
( v ) A discussion of any other information that may have bearing upon the exclusion process; and
( vi ) The supporting documentary evidence including any expert opinion rendered in the case.
( 2 ) The attachments to the report should be provided in a manner that they may be easily referenced from the report.
[84 FR 3057, Feb. 8, 2019]
United States Court of Appeals

for the Fifth Circuit

No. 19-40517

United States of America, 

Plaintiff—Appellee,

versus

Alejandro Pineda-Campuzano, 

Defendant—Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Texas 

USDC No. 7:18-CR-1425-1

Before Jolly, Elrod, and Graves, Circuit Judges.

Per Curiam:*

Alejandro Pineda-Campuzano challenges the 60-month prison 

sentence and four-year term of supervised release imposed following his 

guilty plea conviction for possession with intent to distribute approximately 

212 kilograms of marijuana. Pineda-Campuzano argues that the district court 

erred in finding him ineligible for safety-valve relief under 

* Pursuant to 5th Circuit Rule 47.5, the court has determined that this 

opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited 

circumstances set forth in 5th Circuit Rule 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

October 28, 2021

Lyle W. Cayce

Clerk

Case: 19-40517 Document: 00516072942 Page: 1 Date Filed: 10/28/2021
No. 19-40517

2

18 U.S.C. § 3553(f), and in imposing special conditions of supervised release 

in the written judgment that were not orally pronounced at sentence. With 

respect to safety-valve relief under § 3553(f), Pineda-Campuzano claims that 

his Texas conviction for Assault-Family Violence is not a “violent offense” 

and that he is therefore not disqualified from relief on that basis.

We previously affirmed the district court’s denial of safety-valve relief 

but determined that the court’s imposition of special conditions of release 

that were not orally pronounced at sentence was an abuse of discretion.

United States v. Pineda-Campuzano, 812 F. App’x 293, 294 (5th Cir. 2020)

(per curiam). Pineda-Campuzano filed a petition for certiorari, and the 

Supreme Court vacated our judgment and remanded for further 

consideration in light of Borden v. United States, 141 S. Ct. 1817 (2021). 

Pineda-Campuzano v. United States, 141 S. Ct. 2784 (2021) (mem.).

The government concedes that post-Borden, Pineda-Campuzano’s 

Texas conviction is not a “violent offense” under 18 U.S.C. § 3553(f)

because it may be committed with a mens rea of recklessness. For this reason, 

the parties agree that Pineda-Campuzano is not precluded from safety-valve 

relief on that basis. Accordingly, we REMAND to the district court for 

resentencing consistent with Borden v. United States, 141 S. Ct. 1817 (2021).

Case: 19-40517 Document: 00516072942 Page: 2 Date Filed: 10/28/2021
Regulatory Evaluation

Docket No. FAA-2012-1327 Directorate Identifier: 2012-NE-47-AD

If you make changes to the values in the table below, you must ensure the totals update accordingly. If 

they do not, click (or Tab) into and then out of the changed cell.

Estimated Costs:

Action

(e.g., Inspection, 

replacement)

Do not include oncondition costs here

Costs per Product (e.g., aircraft, engine, 

propeller, appliance)

Work-hours

(include 

access, testing, 

and close-up)

Labor 

cost 

(@$85/h

our)

Parts Cost Total Costs 

(labor + 

parts)

Number of 

U.S. 

Registered 

Products

Total Cost 

for U.S. Fleet

Initial Inspection 44 $3,740.0

0

$0 $3,740.00 56 $209,440.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

The known number of products in compliance:

Total Costs of compliance for U.S. fleet: $209,440

Costs covered under warranty (if known) $

On-Condition Costs:

Action

(e.g., Inspection, 

replacement)

Work-hours 

(include access, 

testing, and closeup)

Labor cost 

(@$85/hour)

Parts Cost Cost per Product

$ 0.00 $ $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00

Special considerations for Economic Analysis (Use this field to explain anything in the Estimated Costs table 

that was assumed or might not be obvious. This field can also be used to explain warranty costs): N/A
Executive Order 12866:

Could the AD be considered a “significant regulatory action”?

YES* NO 

*Explanation: 

DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedures:

Is the AD significant? 

YES* NO 

*Explanation: 

Regulatory Flexibility Act:

Will the AD have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities? Explain for 

either a Yes or No answer.

YES NO 

Explanation: 

Intrastate Aviation in Alaska:

This AD could affect intrastate aviation in Alaska. Is it appropriate to include specific requirements for 

aircraft operated in Alaska where aviation might be the only mode of transportation?

YES* NO 

*Explanation:
§ 411.590 What can an EN do if the EN disagrees with our decision on a payment request? ( a ) If an EN other than a State VR agency has a payment dispute with us, the dispute shall be resolved under the dispute resolution procedures contained in the EN's agreement with us.
( b ) If a State VR agency serving a beneficiary as an EN has a dispute with us regarding payment under an EN payment system, the State VR agency may, within 60 days of receiving notice of our decision, request reconsideration in writing. The State VR agency must send the request for reconsideration to the PM. The PM will forward to us the request for reconsideration and a recommendation. We will notify the State VR agency of our reconsidered decision in writing.
( c ) An EN (including a State VR agency) cannot appeal determinations we make about an individual's right to benefits (e.g. determinations that disability benefits should be suspended, terminated, continued, denied, or stopped or started on a different date than alleged). Only the beneficiary or applicant or his or her representative can appeal these determinations. See §§ 404.900 *et seq.* and 416.1400 *et seq.* of this chapter.
( d ) Determinations or decisions we make about a beneficiary's right to benefits may cause payments we have already made to an EN (or denial of payment to an EN) to be incorrect, resulting in an underpayment or overpayment to the EN. If this happens, we will make any necessary adjustments to future payments (see § 411.555). See § 411.555(c) for when we will not make an adjustment in a case in which an overpayment results from a determination or decision we make about a beneficiary's right to benefits.) While an EN cannot appeal our determination about an individual's right to benefits, the EN may furnish any evidence the EN has which relates to the issue(s) to be decided on appeal if the individual appeals our determination.
[66 FR 67420, Dec. 28, 2001, as amended at 73 FR 29351, May 20, 2008]
#### § 1002.136 Who determines the characterization of service?

The branch of service in which the employee performs the tour of duty determines the characterization of service.
#### § 404.2118 [Reserved]
Exhibit 32.2





Certification
of Principal Financial Officer


Pursuant
to


Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. 1350)





In
connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended
December 31, 2010 (the “Report”) of ATS Corporation (the “Registrant”), as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, I, Pamela
A. Little, Co-Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the
Registrant, hereby certify that:





(1)           The
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and





(2)           The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the
Registrant.




Date:
      February 17, 2011
              By:
              /s/ Pamela A.
LittlePamela
      A. Little
                Co-Chief Executive Officer
      and Chief Financial Officer
                (Principal
      Financial Officer)
(No. 74-CC-151

#### Continental Oil Company, Claimant, *vs.*State of Illinois, Department of Law Enforcement, Respondent.

*Opinion filed January 22, 1974.*

Continental Oil Company, Claimant, pro se.

William J. Scott, Attorney General; Howard W. Feldman, Assistant Attorney General, for Respondent.

Per Curiam.
**Exhibit 13.1**

 

**CERTIFICATIONPURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. Section 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

** **

Inconnection with the Annual Report of Patni Computer Systems Limited (the “Company”)on Form 20-F for the period ended December 31, 2006 as filed with theSecurities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), NarendraK. Patni, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, hereby certifies, pursuant to18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

1.                  The Reportfully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) ofthe Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

2.                  Theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

 
| Date: March 04, 2008 |   |
|---------------------------|--------|
|                      |   |
|                      |   |
| /s/ Narendra K. Patni     |   |
| Narendra K. Patni         |   |
| Chief Executive  Officer  |   |

 

----
### SUBCHAPTER IV—SPECIAL PROGRAMS
Exhibit 23.3

CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

We have issued our report dated March 17, 2008, accompanying the consolidated financial statements and management's assessment of the effectiveness of
internal control over financial reporting included in the Annual Report of ATS Corporation (which report expresses and unqualified opinion and contains an explanatory paragraph relating to ATS
Corporation's adoption of Financial Accounting Standards Board Interpretation No. 48,Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes on Interpretation of FASB Statement
No. 109)on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2007. We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference of said report in the Registration
Statements of ATS Corporation on Forms S-3 (No. 333-124638) and S-8 (No. 333-146075).

McLean,
Virginia
March 14, 2008

---



QuickLinks
Exhibit 99.1
 From Millions of Computers to Billions of Devices; LogMeIn Acquires Pachube,
Takes Aim at Internet of Things
 Gains Data and Application Platform for New Classes of Smart Devices
 LONDON
AND WOBURN, Mass., July 19, 2011 LogMeIn, Inc www.pachube.com 1
  The Pachube Service and User Community
  The Internet of Things, Smart Devices
 Wall Street Journal article
 
 1
    
    The Wall Street Journal, July 15, 2011,
Now, Even Grannys Fuzzy Slippers Are Texting You




---



##### 



Terms and Financial Impact
  Conference Call Information for Wednesday, July 27, 2011 at 5:00 p.m. ET
 http://www.LogMeIn.com
 About LogMeIn, Inc.
 LogMeIn
 About Pachube
 www.pachube.com
 This press release contains forward-looking statements within the meaning of the safe harbor
provisions of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995, including but not limited to,
statements




---



##### 



regarding the speed and volume of devices coming online and the amount of data they will be capable
of generating, the effect of the Pachube platform on the ability of people to share, collaborate
and make use of information, the ability of the Pachube platform to help create better energy
management systems, smarter cities, smarter homes, the ability of the Company to accelerate the
growth of Pachubes global community and the Companys estimates regarding the amount of operating
costs it is expected to absorb in connection with the acquisition. Forward-looking statements are
subject to a number of risks and uncertainties, many of which involve factors or circumstances that
are beyond the Companys control. The Companys actual results could differ materially from those
stated or implied in forward-looking statements due to a number of factors, including but not
limited to the Companys ability to integrate the businesses, technologies, products, personnel and
operations of Pachube, the Companys ability to retain employees and customers of Pachube and the
Companys ability to compete effectively. Reference is made to these and other factors discussed
in the Risk Factors section of the companys most recent quarterly report filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission. In addition, any forward-looking statements included in this
press release represent the Companys views as of the date of this release. While the Company
anticipates that subsequent events and developments may cause the Companys views to change, the
Company specifically disclaims any obligation to update these forward-looking statements.
 LogMeIn is a registered trademark of LogMeIn in the U.S. and other countries. iPad is a trademark
of Apple, Inc., and Android is a trademark of Google, Inc. in the U.S. and other countries around
the world.
 press@logmein.com