alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
CENTRAL VALLEY OPERATIONS OFFICE

CHINOOK SALMON REPORT

December 2004

Note: Bold numbers are not verified by DFG

Winter Run Chinook Salmon Estimated Loss (Incidental Take) Spring Run Chinook Salmon Estimated Loss (Incidental Take) 

Daily SWP Daily CVP Daily Combined Season Combined Daily SWP Daily CVP Daily Combined Season Combined Daily 

Tagged* No Tag Tagged* No Tag Tagged* No Tag Tagged* No Tag Tagged No Tag Tagged No Tag Tagged No Tag Tagged No Tag In C

DATE Estimated Estimated Estimated Estimated Estimated Estimated Estimated Estimated Estimated Estimated Estimated Estimated Estimated Estimated Estimated Estimated

Loss Loss Loss Loss Loss Loss Loss Loss Loss Loss Loss Loss Loss Loss Loss Loss

1-Dec-04 0000 0000 0000 0000 5,482 2-Dec-04 0000 0000 0000 0000 3,639 

3-Dec-04 0000 0000 0000 0000 4,080 

4-Dec-04 0000 0000 0000 0000 3,950 

5-Dec-04 0000 0000 0000 0000 3,813 

6-Dec-04 0000 0000 0000 0000 1,960 

7-Dec-04 0000 0000 0000 0000 4,357 

8-Dec-04 0000 0000 0000 0000 4,733 

9-Dec-04 0000 0000 0000 0000 4,290 

10-Dec-04 0000 0000 0000 0000 4,270 11-Dec-04 0000 0000 0000 0000 1,564 

12-Dec-04 0000 0000 0000 0000 1,861 13-Dec-04 0000 0000 0000 0000 1,791 

14-Dec-04 0000 0000 0000 0000 1,803 15-Dec-04 0000 0000 0000 0000 1,814 16-Dec-04 0000 0000 0000 0000 5,691 

17-Dec-04 0000 0000 0000 0000 6,299 18-Dec-04 0000 0000 0000 0000 6,815 

19-Dec-04 0000 0000 0000 0000 6,333 

20-Dec-04 0000 0000 0000 0000 5,534 

21-Dec-04 0000 0000 0000 0000 5,932 

22-Dec-04 0000 0000 0000 0000 5,115 

23-Dec-04 0000 0000 0000 0000 4,813 

24-Dec-04 0000 0000 0000 0000 4,368 25-Dec-04 0000 0000 0000 0000 4,360 26-Dec-04 0000 0000 0000 0000 4,066 

27-Dec-04 0000 0000 0000 0000 3,801 28-Dec-04 0000 0000 0000 0000 3,839 29-Dec-04 0000 0000 0000 0000 4,388 30-Dec-04 0000 0000 0000 0000 4,939 31-Dec-04 0000 0000 0000 0000 7,115 

Total 0000 0 0 0 00000 0 0 0 0 132,816 11

Winter Run Incidental Take Levels (Oct 1 thru May 31) Spring Run Incidental Take Levels for Season Combined Total (Oct 1 thru Jun 30)Tagged Yellow Light Level = ??? SeasonTagged Red Light Level = ??? SeasonNo Tag Yellow Light Level = ??? SeasonNo Tag Red Light Level = ??? Season* This number is determined by Winter Run Length only until the tags have been read. All tags from Winter Run length fish have been read and numbers have been updated thru 12/31/04.

Banks Tr
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

DAY HIGH

 189

 193

 198

 205

 208

 209

 211

 210

 213

 223

 221

 233

 234

 230

 226

 228

 223

 218

 215

 225

 220

 214

 230

 222

 220

 216

 220

 216

 174

 176

 182

 188

 195

 196

 199

 200

 200

 201

 205

 210

 215

 215

 208

 205

 206

 206

 205

 205

 206

 207

 203

 203

 202

 205

 199

 198

 179

 183

 190

 197

 201

 202

 204

 204

 204

 207

 211

 217

 220

 218

 214

 212

 210

 209

 209

 212

 213

 210

 210

 209

 209

 208

 206

 203

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

FEBRUARY 2018 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: March 1, 2018

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

RIO VISTA ON THE SACRAMENTO RIVER
##### Table of Contents



UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
 Washington, D.C. 20549
 Form 6-K
 REPORT OF FOREIGN PRIVATE ISSUER
PURSUANT TO RULE 13a-16 OR 15d-16
UNDER THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
 July 6, 2011
 Commission File Number: 000-50975
 China Finance Online Co. Limited
 
   
  
 
  þ o
 o
 o
 o þ
 n/a




---



##### 



SIGNATUREEXHIBIT INDEXEX-99.1 RESULTS OF 2011 ANNUAL GENERAL MEETING




---



##### Table of Contents



SIGNATURE
  China Finance Online Co. LimitedDate: July 6, 2011
    By:
    /s/ Jun WangName:
    Jun WangTitle:
    Chief Financial Officer




---



##### Table of Contents



Exhibit No.
    
    Description99.1
    
    
    Results of 2011 Annual General Meeting
**Exhibit 32**

** **

**Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, As AdoptedPursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**

 

In connection with the Drayton Richdale Corporation (the “Company”)Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission onthe date hereof (the “Report”), I, Antonio Arnel Maquera, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certifypursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to thebest of my knowledge:

 

(1). The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

 

(2). The information contained in the Report fairly presents, inall material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

Date: March 31, 2011

CONFIDENTIAL
Table3b, 24-hr std NAA trendsFinal-RevisedAQS Data Query: 07/14/2011; Last updated: 1/11/2012Designated Area StatesEPARegions1999-2001DesignValue(μg/m3)1, 22000-2002DesignValue(μg/m3)1, 22001-2003DesignValue(μg/m3)1, 22002-2004DesignValue(μg/m3)1, 22003-2005DesignValue(μg/m3)1, 22004-2006DesignValue(μg/m3)1, 22005-2007DesignValue(μg/m3)1, 22006-2008DesignValue(μg/m3)1, 22007-2009DesignValue(μg/m3)1, 22008-2010DesignValue(μg/m3)1, 2Allentown PA 3 37 42 42 39 36 37 37 36 34 32Birmingham AL 4 49 44 40 40 44 44 44 39 34 29Canton-Massillon OH 5 42 42 40 37 38 37 36 incomplete incomplete incompleteCharleston WV 3 41 40 40 36 36 37 38 36 32 28Chico CA 9 62 60 47 46 47 56 55 69 59 51Cleveland-Akron-Lorain OH 5 46 45 46 45 47 43 42 38 36 33Detroit-Ann Arbor MI 5 46 45 44 43 47 44 43 37 35 32Fairbanks AK 10 41 50 40 182 181 184 39 41 57 63Harrisburg-Lebanon-Carlisle PA 3 44 46 47 45 41 38 38 36 34 33Imperial County CA 9 49 50 46 40 39 40 42 36 21 19Johnstown PA 3 35 40 41 40 39 39 39 incomplete 32 30Klamath Falls OR 10 39 55 53 55 41 46 45 46 47 45Knoxville-Sevierville-La Follette TN 4 45 42 38 34 34 35 37 34 29 25Lancaster PA 3 42 43 45 42 44 39 40 37 35 33Liberty-Clairton PA 3 59 63 63 65 68 65 60 53 50 48Logan UT-ID 8, 10 53 55 54 64 65 64 42 36 40 46Los Angeles-South Coast Air Basin CA 9 76 73 72 67 65 57 55 53 49 41Milwaukee-Racine WI 5 39 37 38 38 39 41 41 37 37 33New York-N. New Jersey-LongIslandNY-NJ-CT1,243 40 46 42 44 43 41 38 33 30NogalesAZ9 33 29 29 29 31 38 39 40 31 32OakridgeOR10 56 56 56 52 53 48 47 40 41 38Philadelphia-WilmingtonPA-NJ-DE2, 3 40 43 43 39 39 37 38 36 32 31Pittsburgh-Beaver ValleyPA3 44 45 49 52 52 45 43 39 37 35ProvoUT 8 43 46 45 45 43 44 45 44 50 41SacramentoCA9 68 60 51 49 45 49 52 54 49 40Salt Lake CityUT 8 69 63 55 54 48 49 48 46 48 45San Francisco BayAre CA9 53 52 47 43 39 39 38 36 36 31San Joaquin ValleyCA9 10490 76 62 60 64 69 70 70 65Seattle-TacomaWA10 43 44 40 41 40 42 43 44 46 38Steubenville-WeirtonOH-WV3, 5 47 47 46 47 46 43 44 41 37 31West Central Pinal CountyAZ9 incompleteincompleteincompleteincompleteincompleteincompleteincomplete48 40 31Yuba City-MarysvilleCA9 49 42 39 34 36 40 39 47 42 36Notes:Table 3b. PM2.5 Design Value History for Previously Designated Nonattainment Areas (including Maintenance Areas) for the PM2.52006 24-1. The level of the 2006 24-hour NAAQS for PM2.5 is 35 micrograms per cubic meter (μg/m3). The design value for the 24-hour PM2.5 NAAQS is the 3-year average 98th percentile concentration.2. The design values shown here are computed for the latest design value period using Federal Reference Method or equivalent data reported by States,Tribes, and location agencies to EPA's Air Quality System (AQS) as of 7/14/2011. Concentrations flagged by States, Tribes, andlocal agencies asexceptional events (e.g., high winds, wildfires, volcanic eruptions, construction) and concurred by the associated EPA RegionalOffice are not included inthe calculation of these design values.Page 1
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

DAY

 27,794

 27,827

 27,804

 27,723

 27,645

 27,554

 27,473

 27,381

 27,316

 27,278

 27,174

 27,093

 27,013

 26,951

 26,796

 26,729

 26,558

 26,594

 26,536

 26,320

 26,153

 25,974

 25,734

 25,473

 25,162

 24,782

 24,444

 24,063

 23,701

 23,359

 40,400

 40,707

 40,859

 40,999

 41,114

 41,255

 41,397

 41,554

 41,737

 41,842

 41,979

 42,074

 42,116

 42,174

 42,459

 42,580

 42,707

 42,855

 42,988

 43,265

 43,531

 43,824

 44,156

 44,536

 44,945

 45,344

 45,713

 46,130

 46,506

 46,839

STORAGE - A.F. 

 68,194

 68,534

 68,663

 68,722

 68,759

 68,809

 68,870

 68,935

 69,053

 69,120

 69,153

 69,167

 69,129

 69,125

 69,255

 69,309

 69,265

 69,449

 69,524

 69,585

 69,684

 69,798

 69,890

 70,009

 70,107

 70,126

 70,157

 70,193

 70,207

 70,198

338

730

444

406

364

485

346

539

465

345

329

453

338

394

480

368

355

357

220

362

308

259

375

390

310

273

255

231

268

275

354

901

509

436

383

510

377

572

524

379

346

460

319

392

546

395

333

450

258

393

358

316

421

450

359

283

271

249

275

270

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

NOVEMBER 2015 FULL NATURAL FLOW AT NEW MELONES DAM RUN DATE: 12/09/2015

TOTALS +2,035 12,089

* October 1, 23,979

 17.4

 19.2

 20.2

 21.1

 21.9

 22.9

 23.6

 24.8

 25.8

 26.6

 27.2

 28.2

 28.8

 29.6

 30.6

 31.4

 32.1

 33.0

 33.5

 34.3

 35.0

 35.6

 36.4

 37.3

 38.0

 38.6

 39.1

 39.6

 40.2

 40.7

DONNELLS

RES

BEARDSLEY

RES

2015 TO DATE

NEW

MELONES

INFLOW

C.F.S

NATURAL

RIVER

C.F.S

ACCUM *

FULL

NATURAL

1000 A.F.

RESERVOIR

TOTAL

+31

+340

+129

+59

+37

+50

+61

+65

+118

+67

+33

+14

-38

-4

+130

+54

-44

+184

+75

+61

+99

+114

+92

+119

+98

+19

+31

+36

+14

-9

CHANGE

A.F. C.F.S.

+16

+171

+65

+30

+19

+25

+31

+33

+59

+34

+17

+7

-19

-2

+66

+27

-22

+93

+38

+31

+50

+57

+46

+60

+49

+10

+16

+18

+7

-5
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY HIGH

 758

 718

 675

 689

 672

 711

 957

 762

 926

 803

 1,046

 809

 990

 786

 880

 982

 768

 939

 889

 861

 712

 750

 704

 707

 772

 754

 715

 767

 755

 655

 663

 724

 652

 528

 575

 614

 600

 670

 633

 638

 656

 476

 561

 629

 667

 532

 627

 642

 639

 650

 643

 681

 651

 632

 657

 661

 694

 660

 673

 642

 639

 597

 744

 697

 611

 622

 642

 645

 729

 684

 709

 715

 745

 704

 742

 710

 696

 729

 692

 719

 722

 736

 697

 694

 677

 688

 722

 729

 693

 727

 680

 648

 631

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

MAY 2015 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: June 1, 2015

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

DELTA MENDOTA CANAL AT CHECK 13 (O'NEILL)
1
                  Home Campus
                Des
                  Moines, IA 50328





Assertion
      of Management of Wells Fargo Home Mortgage, a division of Wells Fargo Bank,
      N.A.




As
      of and
      for the year ended December 31, 2005, Wells Fargo Home Mortgage, a division
      of Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. (the Company) has complied in all material respects
      with the minimum servicing standards set forth in the Mortgage Bankers
      Association of America's *Uniform
      Single Attestation Program for Mortgage Bankers.*




As
      of and
      for this same period, the Company had in effect a fidelity bond along with
      an errors
      and omissions policy in the amounts of $100 million and $20 million,
      respectively.








/s/
              Michael J. Heid
            
            February
              21, 2006


Michael
      J. Heid, Division President, Capital Markets, Finance &
Administration


Wells
      Fargo Home Mortgage, a division of Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.






/s/
              Franklin R. Codel
            
            February
              21, 2006


Franklin
      R. Codel, Executive Vice President, Finance and Corporate Real
      Estate


Wells
      Fargo Home Mortgage, a division of Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.




/s/
                Mary Coffin
            
            February
              21, 2006


Mary
      Coffin, Executive Vice President, Servicing & Post Closing


Wells
      Fargo Home
      Mortgage, a
      division of Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.




/s/
              Cara K. Heiden
            
            February
              21, 2006


Cara
      K.
      Heiden, Division President, Nat'l Consumer & Institutional
      Lending


Wells
      Fargo Home Mortgage, a division of Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.






Wells
              Fargo Home Mortgageis
              a division of Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.
<PAGE>   1
                                                                  EXHIBIT 10.136



                   [PREFERRED EQUITIES CORPORATION LETTERHEAD]



                                January 20, 1998



Mego Mortgage Corporation
1000 Parkwood Circle, 5th Floor
Atlanta, GA 30339

Attention: James L. Belter, Executive Vice President

Re:   Loan Program Sub-Servicing Agreement dated as of September 1, 1996 between
      Preferred Equities Corporation ("PEC") and Mego Mortgage Corporation
      ("MMC") as amended by Letter Agreement dated September 2, 1997 (and as
      amended, the "Agreement")

Gentlemen:

This letter serves to confirm our agreement that the monthly servicing fee of
one-twelfth (1/12) of four tenths (4/10) of one percent (0.40%) of the
outstanding principal balance of all loans being serviced on the first day of
the prior month as set forth in Article 4 of the Agreement is hereby modified
and amended to be one-twelfth (1/1 2) of thirty-five one hundredths (35/100) of
one percent (0.35%) commencing for the month of January 1998. Except as modified
hereby, all other terms and conditions of the Agreement shall remain in full
force and effect.

Please sign a copy of this letter in the space indicated below to indicate your
acceptance and approval of the foregoing.

                             Very truly yours,

                             PREFERRED EQUITIES CORPORATION

                             By: /s/ FREDERICK H. CONTE
                                 ----------------------------------------------
                                 Frederick H. Conte, Executive Vice President

Accepted and approved as of this 20th day of January, 1998.

MEGO MORTGAGE CORPORATION

By: /s/ JAMES L. BELTER
    -------------------------------------------
    Jame L. Belter, Executive Vice President
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY HIGH

 10,033

 7,677

 3,310

 1,683

 755

 826

 1,309

 1,667

 1,386

 335

 302

 688

 745

 1,776

 647

 1,156

 1,388

 1,547

 4,251

 6,111

 13,243

 13,545

 13,183

 16,476

 18,860

 20,529

 17,971

 17,867

 15,115

 14,112

 12,387

 1,258

 1,509

 676

 406

 350

 288

 282

 270

 255

 250

 243

 234

 238

 231

 248

 246

 251

 240

 250

 272

 472

 1,522

 1,041

 1,009

 2,384

 3,720

 3,522

 3,583

 3,353

 3,031

 2,510

 4,766

 3,931

 1,576

 723

 440

 375

 400

 439

 403

 289

 274

 293

 312

 409

 325

 351

 383

 540

 1,408

 2,224

 4,705

 4,724

 5,593

 6,637

 8,849

 11,494

 10,419

 9,977

 8,616

 7,871

 7,148

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

JANUARY 2002 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: February 12, 2002

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

PORT CHICAGO TOP IN SUISUN BAY
#### § 404.359 Who is the insured's equitably adopted child?

You may be eligible for benefits as an equitably adopted child if the insured had agreed to adopt you as his or her child but the adoption did not occur. The agreement to adopt you must be one that would be recognized under State law so that you would be able to inherit a child's share of the insured's personal property if he or she were to die without leaving a will. The agreement must be in whatever form, and you must meet whatever requirements for performance under the agreement, that State law directs. If you apply for child's benefits after the insured's death, the law of the State where the insured had his or her permanent home at the time of his or her death will be followed. If you apply for child's benefits during the insured's life, the law of the State where the insured has his or her permanent home at the time or your application will be followed.
§ 408.912 When are you without fault regarding an overpayment? ( a ) *General—when fault is relevant.* If you request waiver of recovery of an overpayment, we must determine whether you were without fault. You are not relieved of liability and are not without fault solely because we may have been at fault in making the overpayment.
( b ) *The factors we consider to determine whether you were without fault.* When we determine whether you were without fault, we consider all the pertinent circumstances relating to the overpayment. We consider your understanding of your obligation to give us information affecting your payments, your agreement to report events, your knowledge of the occurrence of events that should have been reported, the efforts you made to comply with the reporting requirements, the opportunities you had to comply with the reporting requirements, your ability to comply with the reporting requirements (e.g., your age, comprehension, memory, physical and mental condition), and your understanding of the obligation to return payments that were not due. In determining whether you are without fault based on these factors, we will take into account any physical, mental, educational, or language limitations (including any lack of facility with the English language) you may have. We will determine that you were at fault if, after considering all of the circumstances, we find that the overpayment resulted from one of the following: ( 1 ) Your failure to furnish information which you knew or should have known was material;
( 2 ) An incorrect statement you made which you knew or should have known was incorrect (this includes furnishing your opinion or conclusion when you were asked for facts), or
( 3 ) You did not return a payment, which you knew, or could have been expected to know, was incorrect.
( c ) *Special rule for qualifying overpayments.* Notwithstanding any other provision of this subpart, we will not determine any overpaid individual to be at fault in causing a qualifying overpayment (see § 408.910(c)(1)) unless we determine that the qualifying overpayment made to an individual or a representative payee during the pandemic period (see § 408.902(b)) was the result of fraud or similar fault or involved misuse of benefits by a representative payee (see § 408.641).
[69 FR 25955, May 10, 2004, as amended at 85 FR 52914, Aug. 27, 2020]
I 

114TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 3876 

To protect consumer privacy during the development and use of autonomous 

vehicle technologies. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

NOVEMBER 2, 2015 

Ms. MENG introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee 

on Transportation and Infrastructure 

A BILL 

To protect consumer privacy during the development and 

use of autonomous vehicle technologies. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Autonomous Vehicle 

5 Privacy Protection Act of 2015’’. 

6 SEC. 2. GAO REPORT. 

7 The Comptroller General of the United States shall 

8 make available to the public a report that assesses the or9 ganizational readiness of the Department of TransporVerDate Sep 11 2014 01:01 Nov 03, 2015 Jkt 059200 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 6652 Sfmt 6201 E:\BILLS\H3876.IH H3876

emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 3876 IH

1 tation to address autonomous vehicle technology chal2 lenges, including consumer privacy protections. 

Æ 


emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with BILLS
Exhibit 12.1
 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 302
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 (18 U.S.C. §1350)
  1.
    
    I have reviewed this annual report on Form 20-F of Adecoagro, S.A.;2.
    
    Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact
necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances
under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to
the period covered by this report;3.
    
    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material
respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows
of the company as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;4.
    
    The companys other certifying officer and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as
defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the company
and have:
 (a)
    
    Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our
supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the
company, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us
by others within those entities, particularly during the period in
which this report is being prepared;(b)
    
    [intentionally omitted];(c)
    
    Evaluated the effectiveness of the companys disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the
effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end
of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and(d)
    
    Disclosed in this report any change in the companys internal control
over financial reporting that occurred during the period covered by
the annual report that has materially affected, or is reasonably
likely to materially affect, the companys internal control over
financial reporting; and
 5.
    
    The companys other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based
on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial
reporting, to the companys auditors and the audit committee of the
companys board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
functions):
 (a)
    
    All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
operation of internal control over financial reporting which are
reasonably likely to adversely affect the companys ability to record,
process, summarize and report financial information; and(b)
    
    Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the companys internal
control over financial reporting.
  /s/ Mariano BoschMariano BoschChief Executive Officer
Exhibit 8.1
 Subsidiaries of the Registrant
  Name
    
    JurisdictionAd-Icon Company Limited
    
    Hong KongAd-Icon Advertising (Shanghai) Co., Ltd.
    
    ChinaBeijing Wanshuizhiyuan Advertising Co., Ltd.
    
    ChinaGreat Talent Holdings Limited
    
    Hong KongJieli Investment Management Consulting (Shanghai) Co., Ltd.
    
    ChinaJieli Network Technology Development (Shanghai) Co., Ltd.
    
    ChinaSearchMedia International Limited
    
    ChinaShanghai Botang Advertising Co., Ltd.
    
    ChinaShanghai Haiya Advertising Co., Ltd.
    
    ChinaShenyang Jingli Advertising Co., Ltd.
    
    ChinaWuxi Ruizhong Advertising Co., Ltd.
    
    ChinaZhejiang Continental Advertising Co, Ltd.
    
    China
Exhibit 99.3
  OWNERSHIP
    CERTIFICATION
  This Ownership Certification must be accompanied by a
    completed FCC Worksheet, which is attached to this Ownership
    Certification.
   Holder
   U.S. Citizen
   U.S. Entity
   non-U.S. citizen Non-U.S. Citizen
    voting interests
  equity interests
      ­
    ­
  ­
    ­
  ­
    ­
 ­
    ­
 ­
    ­
#### Louise Hollstein, Appellant, v. The City of Buffalo, Respondent.

Judgment and order affirmed, with costs. All concurred.