alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

DAY ELEV

 979.33

 979.48

 979.56

 979.46

 979.29

 979.36

 979.59

 979.98

 980.25

 980.36

 980.49

 980.40

 980.37

 980.40

 980.38

 980.44

 980.50

 980.40

 980.41

 980.51

 980.35

 980.32

 980.38

 980.53

 980.68

 980.81

 980.71

 980.86

 981.01

 981.14

 1,288.9

 1,290.1

 1,290.8

 1,290.0

 1,288.5

 1,289.1

 1,291.1

 1,294.4

 1,296.7

 1,297.6

 1,298.7

 1,297.9

 1,297.7

 1,297.9

 1,297.8

 1,298.3

 1,298.8

 1,297.9

 1,298.0

 1,298.9

 1,297.5

 1,297.3

 1,297.8

 1,299.0

 1,300.3

 1,301.4

 1,300.6

 1,301.8

 1,303.1

 1,304.2

STORAGE

+1.0

+1.3

+0.7

-0.8

-1.4

+0.6

+1.9

+3.3

+2.3

+0.9

+1.1

-0.8

-0.3

+0.3

-0.2

+0.5

+0.5

-0.9

+0.1

+0.8

-1.4

-0.3

+0.5

+1.3

+1.3

+1.1

-0.9

+1.3

+1.3

+1.1

CHANGE

858

722

435

455

336

399

1,075

2,151

1,198

540

623

529

396

417

476

345

328

449

570

461

364

524

666

670

671

596

659

665

687

596

INFLOW

 14

 0

 14

 14

 14

 14

 14

 39

 0

 14

 14

 14

 14

 14

 14

 14

 14

 14

 14

 14

 1,030

 615

 393

 14

 14

 14

 1,077

 14

 14

 14

POWER

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

SPILL

 275

 41

 55

 821

 1,006

 40

 41

 420

 41

 41

 41

 890

 500

 263

 537

 41

 41

 845

 491

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

OUTLET

 57

 41

 25

 47

 41

 47

 38

 27

 0

 14

 11

 11

 11

 11

 11

 33

 16

 19

 22

 19

 19

 38

 16

 14

 14

 25

 11

 8

 30

 22

C.F.S.

 .21

 .15

 .09

 .17

 .15

 .17

 .14

 .10

 .00

 .05

 .04

 .04

 .04

 .04

 .04

 .12

 .06

 .07

 .08

 .07

 .07

 .14

 .06

 .05

 .05

 .09

 .04

 .03

 .11

 .08

INCHES

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .31

 1.63

 2.09

 .00

 .03

 .03

 .02

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

PRECIP

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

NOVEMBER 2002 NEW MELONES LAKE DAILY OPERATIONS RUN DATE: December 19, 2002

IN LAKE

EVAPORATION

INCHES

C.F.S.

COMPUTED*

1000 ACRE-FEET

RELEASE - C.F.S.

TOTALS +16.2 18,861 3,476 0 6,430 698 2.55 4.11

ACRE-FEET +16,200 37,411 6,895 0 12,754 1,384

COMMENTS:

* COMPUTED INFLOW IS THE SUM OF CHANGE IN STORAGE, RELEASES AND EVAPORATION.

SUMMARY

RELEASE (ACRE-FEET)

POWER 6,895

SPILL 0

OUTLET

TOTAL

 12,754

 19,649

PRECIPITATION

THIS MONTH =

TO DATE =

 4.11

JULY 1, 2002 4.11

 1,287.9

Table 13
[if !vml]>[endif]>

[if !vml]>[endif]>

You have reached the FederalDepository Library Program Electronic Collection (FDLP/EC) Archive. Thisarchive assures ongoing access to publications in the FDLP/EC. Access topublications in the archive is available through GPO's suite of cataloging andlocator services, including the Catalog of U.S. Government Publications(CGP).  Archived copies of publications are retrieved in the event thatpublications are no longer available from the original publishing agency site. 
**Title:****Meteorological data forselected sites along the Colorado River corridor, Arizona, 2011-13**
 
Report
Appendices:One | Two | Three | Four
Table 4
 
SuDoc Number:I 19.76:2014-1247
Item Number:0624-H (online)
CGP systemNumber:000941788
 
April 20, 2018
#### Carmela DiChristopher, as Administratrix of the Estate of Rossino DiChristopher, Deceased, Appellant, v. New York Central Railroad Company, Respondent.

Present — Crosby, P. J., Cunningham, Taylor, Dowling and Harris, JJ.
#### § 404.905 Effect of an initial determination.

An initial determination is binding unless you request a reconsideration within the stated time period, or we revise the initial determination.

[51 FR 300, Jan. 3, 1986]
§ 355.21 Discovery. ( a ) The following types of discovery are authorized: ( 1 ) Requests for production of documents for inspection and copying;
( 2 ) Requests for admissions of the authenticity of any relevant document or of the truth of any relevant fact;
( 3 ) Written interrogatories; and
( 4 ) Depositions.
( b ) For the purpose of this section and §§ 355.22 and 355.23, the term “documents” includes information, documents, reports, answers, records, accounts, papers, and other data and documentary evidence. Nothing contained herein shall be interpreted to require the creation of a document.
( c ) Unless mutually agreed to by the parties, discovery is available only as ordered by the ALJ. The ALJ shall regulate the timing of discovery.
( d ) *Motions for discovery.* ( 1 ) A party seeking discovery may file a motion with the ALJ. Such a motion shall be accompanied by a copy of the requested discovery, or in the case of depositions, a summary of the scope of the proposed deposition.
( 2 ) Within ten days of service, a party may file an opposition to the motion and/or a motion for protective order as provided in § 355.24.
( 3 ) The ALJ may grant a motion for discovery only if he or she finds that the discovery sought— ( i ) Is necessary for the expeditious, fair, and reasonable consideration of the issues;
( ii ) Is not unduly costly or burdensome;
( iii ) Will not unduly delay the proceeding; and
( iv ) Does not seek privileged information.
( 4 ) The burden of showing that discovery should be allowed is on the party seeking discovery.
( 5 ) The ALJ may grant discovery subject to a protective order under § 355.24.
( e ) *Depositions.* ( 1 ) If a motion for deposition is granted, the ALJ shall issue a subpoena for the deponent, which may require the deponent to produce documents. The subpoena shall specify the time and place at which the deposition will be held.
( 2 ) The party seeking to depose shall serve the subpoena in the manner prescribed in § 355.8.
( 3 ) The deponent may file with the ALJ a motion to quash the subpoena or a motion for a protective order within ten days of service.
( 4 ) The party seeking to depose shall provide for the taking of a verbatim transcript of the deposition, which it shall make available to all other parties for inspection and copying.
( f ) Each party shall bear its own costs of discovery.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


        

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS  SCHEDULE  CONTAINS  SUMMARY  FINANCIAL   INFORMATION  EXTRACTED  FROM  THE
FINANCIAL  STATEMENTS OF REALMARK PROPERTY INVESTORS LIMITED PARTNERSHIP III FOR
THREE MONTHS ENDED MARCH 31, 1997, AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE
TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1997
<CASH>                                       1,212,010    
<SECURITIES>                                         0         
<RECEIVABLES>                                  622,834    
<ALLOWANCES>                                   607,574    
<INVENTORY>                                          0         
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             1,913,028      
<PP&E>                                      12,449,433    
<DEPRECIATION>                               5,860,076           
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               8,594,446        
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        1,026,829    
<BONDS>                                      5,749,955    
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0                 
<PREFERRED>                                          0         
<COMMON>                                             0    
<OTHER-SE>                                           0         
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 8,594,446        
<SALES>                                              0                 
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               787,062         
<CGS>                                                0         
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                1,057,183    
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                39,051     
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0         
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             268,379    
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (309,172)         
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0         
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0         
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0                 
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0                 
<CHANGES>                                            0         
<NET-INCOME>                                  (309,172)   
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (19.28)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0                     
                                                             
        

</TABLE>
#### § 411.350 Must a State VR agency participate in the Ticket to Work program?

A State VR agency may elect, but is not required, to participate in the Ticket to Work program as an EN. The State VR agency may elect on a case-by-case basis to participate in the Ticket to Work program as an EN, or it may elect to provide services to beneficiaries under the VR cost reimbursement option. (See § 411.115(s) for a definition of the VR cost reimbursement option.)

[73 FR 29345, May 20, 2008]
EXHIBIT 12
                    BellSouth Corporation
          Computation Of Earnings To Fixed Charges
                    (Dollars In Millions)





                                             
                                              For the Six
                                              Months Ended
                                                June 30,
                                                  1997
1. Earnings                                  
                                             
   (a) Income from continuing operations      $   2,603
before deductions for taxes and interest
                                             
   (b) Portion of rental expense                     39
representative of interest factor
                                             
   (c) Equity in losses from less-than-50%           46
owned investments (accounted for under the
equity method of accounting)
                                             
   (d) Excess of earnings over distributions 
of less-than-50%-owned investments           
(accounted for under the equity method of    
accounting)                                         (43)
                                             
     TOTAL                                    $   2,645
                                             
2. Fixed Charges                             
                                             
   (a) Interest                               $     379
                                             
   (b) Portion of rental expense             
representative of interest factor                    39
                                             
     TOTAL                                    $     418
                                             
   Ratio (1 divided by 2)                           6.3
Exhibit 32.2



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report of Lotus Capital Corp. (the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ending September 30, 2005 (the "Report"), I, Jose Acevedo, Principal Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



1)

The Report fully complies with the requirement of Section 13(a) or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



2)

The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the Company's financial position and results of operations.







/s/Jose Acevedo

Principal Financial Officer

November 17, 2005
§ 1001.151 Other funding criteria. ( a ) Up to four percent of the total amount available for allocation will be available for distribution based on Transition Assistance Program (TAP) workload and other exigencies.
( b ) Funding for TAP workshops will be allocated on a per workshop basis. Funding to the States will be provided pursuant to the approved State Plan.
( c ) Funds for exigent circumstances, such as unusually high levels of unemployment, surges in the demand for transitioning services, including the need for TAP workshops, will be allocated based on need.
### §1357. Trade agreements with the Philippines

Until July 4, 1974, no trade agreement shall be made with the Philippines under section 1351 of title 19, unless, prior to such time, the President of the United States has made the proclamation provided for in section 1347 of this title, or the executive agreement provided for in subchapter III of this chapter has been terminated.

(Apr. 30, 1946, ch. 244, title V, §508, 60 Stat. 158.)

#### Suspension of Provisions

Section not applicable during such time as the revised agreement between the United States and the Philippines is in effect, see section 1373 of this title.

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

The executive agreement provided for in subchapter III of this chapter, referred to in text, expired July 4, 1974.
#### Missouri Pacific Railway Company, appellee, v. Estate of George Jay, appellant.

Filed February 17, 1898.

No. 8140.

Administrator: Revocation oe Letters. One sued by an administrator is not authorized to petition the county court to revoke plaintiff’s letters of administration. *Missouri P, li. Go: v. Bradley,*51 Neb. 598, followed.

*748Appeal from the district court of Douglas county. Heard below before Ambrose, J.

*Reversed.*

*Connell & Ives,*for appellant.

*B. P. Waggoner*and *James W. Orr,*contrav

Norval, J.

The county court of Douglas county appointed an administrator of the estate of George Jay, deceased. Subsequently, the administrator instituted an action in the district court of said county against the Missouri Pacific Railway Company to recover damages on account of the death of his intestate. Thereupon the-railway company petitioned the county court to revoke plaintiff’s appointment as administrator, which application was denied, and on appeal- to the district court the letters of administration were revoked. The estate has prosecuted an appeal to this court. In *Missouri P. R. Co. v. Bradley,*51 Neb. 596, it was decided that one sued by an administrator is not entitled to petition the county court to revoke the letters of administration. Upon that authority the judgment of the district court is reversed and the proceedings dismissed.

Reversed and dismissed.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                              5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the
financial statements of Realmark Property Investors Limited Partnership lll for
the quarter ended September 30, 2000, and is qualified in its entirety by
reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER>                           1

<S>                                    <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                          3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                                             DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                                                JUL-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                                                  SEP-30-2000
<CASH>                                                            913,191
<SECURITIES>                                                            0
<RECEIVABLES>                                                     444,073
<ALLOWANCES>                                                      348,338
<INVENTORY>                                                             0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                                        0
<PP&E>                                                         13,018,491
<DEPRECIATION>                                                  6,464,070
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                                  8,188,403
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                                   0
<BONDS>                                                         4,892,375
<COMMON>                                                                0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                                   0
<PREFERRED>                                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                                              0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                                    8,188,403
<SALES>                                                                 0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                                  706,930
<CGS>                                                                   0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                                     805,234
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                                        0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                                        0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                                130,666
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                                   (98,304)
<INCOME-TAX>                                                            0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                                     0
<DISCONTINUED>                                                          0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                                         0
<CHANGES>                                                               0
<NET-INCOME>                                                      (98,304)
<EPS-BASIC>                                                             0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                                           0


</TABLE>
§ 408.1000 What is this subpart about? ( a ) *Explanation of the administrative review process.* This subpart explains the procedures we follow in determining your appeal rights under title VIII of the Social Security Act. The regulations describe the process of administrative review and explain your right to judicial review after you have taken all the necessary administrative steps. The administrative review process consists of several steps, which usually must be requested within certain time periods and in the following order: ( 1 ) *Initial determination.* This is a determination we make about whether you qualify for and can become entitled to SVB or whether your SVB entitlement can continue. It can also be about any other matter, as discussed in § 408.1003, that gives you a right to further review.
( 2 ) *Reconsideration.* If you are dissatisfied with an initial determination, you may ask us to reconsider it.
( 3 ) *Hearing before an administrative law judge.* If you are dissatisfied with the reconsideration determination, you may request a hearing before an administrative law judge.
( 4 ) *Appeals Council review.* If you are dissatisfied with the decision of the administrative law judge, you may request that the Appeals Council review the decision.
( 5 ) *Federal court review.* When you have completed the steps of the administrative review process listed in paragraphs (a)(1) through (a)(4) of this section, we will have made our final decision. If you are dissatisfied with our final decision, you may request judicial review by filing an action in a Federal district court.
( 6 ) *Expedited appeals process.* At some time after your initial determination has been reviewed, if you have no dispute with our findings of fact and our application and interpretation of the controlling laws, but you believe that a part of the law is unconstitutional, you may use the expedited appeals process. This process permits you to go directly to a Federal district court so that the constitutional issue may be resolved.
( b ) *Nature of the administrative review process.* In making a determination or decision in your case, we conduct the administrative review process in an informal, nonadversary manner. In each step of the review process, you may present any information you feel is helpful to your case. Subject to the limitations on Appeals Council consideration of additional evidence, we will consider at each step of the review process any information you present as well as all the information in our records. You may present the information yourself or have someone represent you, including an attorney. If you are dissatisfied with our decision in the review process, but do not take the next step within the stated time period, you will lose your right to further administrative review and your right to judicial review, unless you can show us that there was good cause for your failure to make a timely request for review.
COURT OF APPEALS

SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS

FORT WORTH

NO. 02-14-00265-CV

In the Interest of D.A., A Child §

§

§

§

§

From the 323rd District Court

of Tarrant County (323-100117-14)

February 5, 2015

Opinion by Chief Justice Livingston

Dissent by Justice Gabriel

JUDGMENT

This court has considered the record on appeal in this case and holds that 

there was error in the trial court’s order of dismissal. It is ordered that the order

of the trial court is reversed and the case is remanded to the trial court.

SECOND DISTRICT COURT OF APPEALS 

By /s/ Terrie Livingston

 Chief Justice Terrie Livingston
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY HIGH

 238

 240

 255

 270

 252

 240

 259

 211

 200

 188

 177

 217

 245

 255

 255

 255

 284

 297

 257

 278

 300

 254

 234

 226

 195

 227

 290

 291

 290

 301

 301

 147

 148

 148

 147

 150

 151

 153

 155

 156

 158

 160

 160

 160

 156

 160

 160

 161

 161

 161

 161

 162

 162

 164

 166

 168

 170

 173

 175

 176

 176

 178

 159

 164

 170

 171

 170

 170

 171

 165

 167

 165

 163

 165

 169

 170

 173

 175

 182

 184

 176

 186

 190

 182

 173

 173

 172

 176

 187

 186

 185

 193

 203

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

AUGUST 2013 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: February 19, 2014

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

RIO VISTA ON THE SACRAMENTO RIVER
EXHIBIT 11
                              BellSouth Corporation
                        Computation of Earnings Per Share

                               For the Three Month         For the Six Month
                              Period Ended June 30,       Period Ended June 30,
                                1999        1998            1999        1998
Basic Earnings Per
 Common Share:

Net Income                   $   786     $   818         $ 1,401       $ 1,710

Weighted average shares
Outstanding                    1,891       1,978           1,912         1,980

Earnings Per Common Share    $   .42     $   .41         $   .73       $   .86

<PAGE>
                                                                      EXHIBIT 11
                              BellSouth Corporation
                  Computation of Earnings Per Share (continued)

                                  For the Three Month        For the Six Month
                                 Period Ended June 30,     Period Ended June 30,
                                  1999        1998          1999        1998
Diluted Earnings Per
 Common Share:

Net Income                     $   786     $   818       $ 1,401     $ 1,710

Weighted average shares
Outstanding                      1,891       1,978         1,912       1,980

Incremental shares from
Assumed exercise of
stock options and payment of
performance share awards            18          12            18          12

Total Shares                     1,909       1,990         1,930       1,992

Earnings Per Common Share      $   .41     $   .41       $   .73     $   .86