alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 99.1 - ANNUAL FUNDS APPLICATION STATEMENT




                              [LOGO] JPMORGAN


June 30, 2005

     Hartford Life Global Funding Trusts - Annual Funds Application Statement

I, Albert P. Mari, Jr., being a duly appointed officer of JPMorgan Chase Bank,
N.A. ("Indenture Trustee"), do hereby certify on behalf of the Indenture
Trustee, that, with respect to Hartford Life Global Funding Trust 2005-053:





         1. I have reviewed and examined the application by the Indenture
Trustee, during the fiscal year ending June 15, 2005; of trust money collected
by the Indenture Trustee pursuant to Section 5.02 of the Indenture, pursuant to
which the trust's notes (the "Notes") were issued; and

         2. Based upon my review and examination, to the best of my knowledge,
during such fiscal year, the trust money collected by the Indenture Trustee was
properly applied, pursuant to Section 5.02 of the Indenture.

         Nothing herein shall constitute a representation as to the proper
application by the registered holder of the Notes or the trust of the trust
monies received by it.



JPMORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A., as Indenture Trustee
Worldwide Securities Services
4 New York Plaza, 15th Floor
New York, NY 10004


/s/ Albert P. Mari, Jr.


Name:  Albert P. Mari, Jr.
Title: Vice President


<TABLE>
<S><C>
JPMORGAN CHASE BANK o Institutional Trust Services o 4 New York Plaza, Floor 15, New York, NY 10004
</TABLE>
#### § 404.920 Reconsidered determination.

After you or another person requests a reconsideration, we will review the evidence we considered in making the initial determination and any other evidence we receive. We will make our determination based on the preponderance of the evidence.

[73 FR 76943, Dec. 18, 2008]
sourceTypeIDisLeapYearmonthID monthVMTFraction

11 N 7 0.092325

21 N 7 0.092325

31 N 7 0.092325

32 N 7 0.092325

41 N 7 0.092325

42 N 7 0.092325

43 N 7 0.092325

51 N 7 0.092325

52 N 7 0.092325

53 N 7 0.092325

54 N 7 0.092325

61 N 7 0.092325

62 N 7 0.092325
Exhibit 99.4  -  Aggregate Statement of Principal and Interest Distributions to Certificateholders as of December 31, 2005
STRUCTURED ARM LOAN TRUSTSERIES 2005-9
Beginning
Principal
Interest
Ending
Class
Balance
Distributed
Distributed
Balance
1-A
267,469,000.00
57,994,653.96
6,828,712.41
209,474,346.04
2-A1
216,548,000.00
14,513,533.62
5,981,235.87
202,034,466.38
2-A2A
166,000,000.00
11,125,693.08
4,585,058.07
154,874,306.92
2-A2B
21,000,000.00
1,407,467.18
580,037.46
19,592,532.82
AX*
671,017,000.00
0.00
3,657,653.70
585,975,652.16
B1
12,500,000.00
11,347.75
333,531.54
12,488,652.25
B2
8,455,000.00
7,675.61
226,727.19
8,447,324.39
B3
5,146,000.00
4,671.63
139,707.86
5,141,328.37
B4
9,191,000.00
8,343.78
261,770.06
9,182,656.22
B5
3,309,000.00
3,003.98
95,346.19
3,305,996.02
B6
5,146,000.00
4,671.63
173,987.99
5,141,328.37
B7
2,940,000.00
2,668.98
99,402.38
2,937,331.02
B8
1,837,000.00
1,667.67
62,109.59
1,835,332.33
R
100.00
100.00
0.34
0.00
B9
4,044,000.00
3,671.24
136,728.99
4,040,328.76
B10
6,618,000.00
6,007.94
223,756.79
6,611,992.06
B11
5,158,996.00
4,683.44
174,427.38
5,154,312.56
BX*
64,344,996.00
0.00
251,665.76
64,286,582.35
P
0.00
0.00
654,938.75
0.00
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY HIGH

 154

 353

 242

 177

 202

 223

 229

 172

 178

 204

 168

 157

 162

 160

 170

 165

 162

 170

 161

 166

 165

 171

 204

 197

 202

 178

 179

 178

 181

 184

 191

 111

 125

 121

 122

 126

 133

 132

 132

 135

 136

 130

 126

 130

 130

 129

 142

 138

 148

 149

 148

 155

 158

 155

 166

 169

 160

 168

 166

 160

 166

 175

 133

 161

 153

 139

 143

 151

 152

 144

 149

 153

 144

 145

 146

 148

 150

 151

 152

 156

 154

 156

 160

 163

 166

 176

 181

 173

 174

 173

 174

 176

 181

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

MARCH 2000 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: April 11, 2000

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

PITTSBURG TOP ON THE SACRAMENTO RIVER
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

DAY HIGH

 108

 106

 101

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 86

 77

 72

 71

 76

 78

 67

 75

 72

 67

 63

 64

 66

 70

 69

 60

 66

 106

 59

 92

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 75

 72

 70

 69

 68

 68

 66

 65

 64

 62

 61

 61

 61

 63

 59

 59

 59

 106

 100

 97

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 79

 73

 71

 69

 71

 71

 67

 67

 67

 64

 62

 62

 62

 65

 62

 59

 63

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

FEBRUARY 2013 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: March 15, 2013

HIGH LOW MEAN

 52.1

 53.0

 58.6

 61.5

 57.1

 60.2

 56.7

 53.9

 57.1

 58.1

 59.8

 55.7

 51.5

 51.8

 52.4

 52.4

 52.4

 52.2

 51.6

 50.9

 51.6

 51.9

 52.6

 51.9

 52.1

 52.4

 52.3

 53.6

 49.7

 50.6

 49.8

 47.3

 50.7

 47.8

 50.6

 46.3

 43.3

 43.6

 44.5

 45.8

 50.1

 50.3

 50.8

 51.2

 51.1

 51.0

 50.5

 49.5

 50.0

 50.5

 51.3

 50.7

 50.3

 50.9

 50.7

 51.3

 50.9

 51.6

 53.3

 53.8

 54.3

 53.7

 53.7

 49.9

 49.9

 50.6

 52.0

 50.2

 50.7

 51.0

 51.5

 51.7

 51.7

 51.6

 51.2

 50.3

 50.7

 51.1

 51.8

 51.3

 51.2

 51.6

 51.5

 52.4

HIGH LOW MEAN

 10.7

 10.6

 10.7

 11.1

 10.5

 11.0

 10.6

 11.2

 11.7

 11.7

 11.6

 11.4

 10.6

 10.6

 10.6

 10.5

 10.5

 10.5

 10.5

 10.5

 10.6

 10.7

 10.7

 10.6

 10.7

 10.7

 10.7

 10.7

 10.5

 10.2

 9.4

 9.1

 9.7

 9.3

 9.7

 9.9

 9.6

 9.4

 9.3

 9.8

 10.5

 10.5

 10.4

 10.3

 10.3

 10.3

 10.3

 10.3

 10.5

 10.5

 10.5

 10.4

 10.6

 10.5

 10.5

 10.3

 10.6

 10.4

 10.2

 10.1

 10.0

 10.2

 10.1

 10.6

 10.6

 10.5

 10.4

 10.7

 10.6

 10.5

 10.5

 10.4

 10.4

 10.4

 10.4

 10.4

 10.6

 10.6

 10.6

 10.6

 10.6

 10.6

 10.6

 10.4

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

RIPON ON THE STANISLAUS RIVER

 ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS WATER TEMPERATURE, DEG DISSOLVED OXYZEN, PPM
**EXHIBIT32.1**

 

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO RULE 13a-14(b) OF THEEXCHANGE ACT AND 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ENACTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

 

In connection with the Quarterly Report of IntrusionInc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q (the “Report”), for the three monthperiod ending September 30, 2008 as filed with the Securities and ExchangeCommission on the date hereof, each of the undersigned Officers of the Companydoes hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as enactedpursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

(1)                                                        The Report fully complies with therequirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Actof 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and

 

(2)                                                        The information contained in the Reportfairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and resultsof operations of the Company.

 

 
| November 13, 2008 | /s/ G. Ward Paxton      |
|------------------------|-------------------------|
|                   | G. Ward Paxton          |
|                   | Chief Executive Officer |

 

 
| November 13, 2008 | /s/ Michael L. Paxton   |
|------------------------|-------------------------|
|                   | Michael  L. Paxton      |
|                   | Chief Financial Officer |

 

**The foregoing certification isbeing furnished solely pursuant to Section 906 of the act and is not beingfiled as part of the report or as a separate disclosure document.**

 

----
I 

114TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 4005 

To amend titles 23 and 49, United States Code, to allow local hiring for 

transportation projects. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

NOVEMBER 16, 2015 

Ms. BASS (for herself, Ms. HAHN, Ms. ROYBAL-ALLARD, Mr. CA ́RDENAS, Mr. 

TED LIEU of California, Mrs. NAPOLITANO, Mr. SCHIFF, and Ms. MAXINE WATERS of California) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure 

A BILL 

To amend titles 23 and 49, United States Code, to allow 

local hiring for transportation projects. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Local Hire Act’’. 

5 SEC. 2. HIGHWAY PROJECTS. 

6 Section 112 of title 23, United States Code, is 

7 amended by adding at the end the following: 

8 ‘‘(h) LOCAL HIRING.— 


emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 4005 IH

1 ‘‘(1) IN GENERAL.—Notwithstanding any other 

2 provision of law, a State may establish local hiring 

3 bid specifications or consider the hiring of local 

4 workers in the evaluation of bids and proposals for 

5 a project under this title. 

6 ‘‘(2) DEFINITION.—For purposes of this sub7 section, the term ‘local’ means the geographic 

8 boundaries of a local area, as defined by the con9 tracting agency, in which the project is located.’’. 

10 SEC. 3. PUBLIC TRANSPORTATION PROJECTS. 

11 Section 5325 of title 49, United States Code, is 

12 amended by adding at the end the following: 

13 ‘‘(l) LOCAL HIRING.— 

14 ‘‘(1) IN GENERAL.—Notwithstanding any other 

15 provision of law, a recipient of assistance under this 

16 chapter may establish local hiring bid specifications 

17 or consider local hiring in the evaluation of bids and 

18 proposals for a project under this chapter. 

19 ‘‘(2) DEFINITION.—For purposes of this sub20 section, the term ‘local’ means the geographic 

21 boundaries of a local area, as defined by the con22 tracting agency, in which the project is located.’’. 

Æ 


emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with BILLS
### §360rr. Federal-State cooperation

The Secretary is authorized (1) to accept from State and local authorities engaged in activities related to health or safety or consumer protection, on a reimbursable basis or otherwise, any assistance in the administration and enforcement of this part which he may request and which they may be able and willing to provide and, if so agreed, may pay in advance or otherwise for the reasonable cost of such assistance, and (2) he may, for the purpose of conducting examinations, investigations, and inspections, commission any officer or employee of any such authority as an officer of the Department.

(June 25, 1938, ch. 675, §541, formerly act July 1, 1944, ch. 373, title III, §541, formerly §360E, as added Pub. L. 90–602, §2(3), Oct. 18, 1968, 82 Stat. 1186; renumbered §541 and amended Pub. L. 101–629, §19(a)(1)(B), (3), (4), Nov. 28, 1990, 104 Stat. 4529, 4530; Pub. L. 103–80, §4(a)(2), Aug. 13, 1993, 107 Stat. 779.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section was classified to section 263m of Title 42, The Public Health and Welfare, prior to renumbering by Pub. L. 101–629.

#### Amendments

1993—Pub. L. 103–80 amended directory language of Pub. L. 101–629, §19(a)(4), which renumbered section 263m of Title 42, The Public Health and Welfare, as this section.

1990—Pub. L. 101–629, §19(a)(1)(B), substituted "this part" for "this subpart".

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Noninterference With Other Federal Agencies

Enactment of this section not to be construed to supersede or limit the functions under any other provision of law of any officer or agency of the United States, see section 4 of Pub. L. 90–602, set out as a note under section 360hh of this title.
### SUBCHAPTER VI—LEASES OF DEFENSE ARTICLES AND LOAN AUTHORITY FOR COOPERATIVE RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT PURPOSES
<PAGE>

                                   EXHIBIT 11


                 STATEMENT RE: COMPUTATION OF PER SHARE EARNINGS

Earnings per share ("EPS") is calculated on a Basic EPS and Diluted EPS basis.
Basic EPS excludes dilution and is computed by dividing income available to
common shareholders (the numerator) by the weighted-average number of common
shares outstanding (the denominator) during the period. Income available to
common shareholders is Net Income in the table below and as reported in
Bancorp's income statement. No adjustments were required to net income for any
EPS calculations.

Diluted EPS is calculated by adjusting the denominator for all dilutive
potential common shares that were outstanding during the period. Bancorp had
stock options outstanding during the periods presented below which had a
dilutive effect on EPS. Therefore, the number of additional common shares that
would have been outstanding if the options had been exercised is added to the
denominator to arrive at the dilutive number of shares.

The calculations of earnings per share below are based on the weighted average
number of shares outstanding, adjusted for the 5% stock dividend paid July 28,
1999, including all common stock and common stock equivalents in conformity with
the instructions for Item 601 of Regulation S-K.

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                              Three Months Ended  September 30,    Nine Months Ended September 30,
(Dollars in thousands)               1999          1998                  1999           1998
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
<S>                             <C>           <C>                   <C>            <C>
Net income                          $4,105        $4,127                $12,397        $12,386
                                    ======        ======                 ======         ======
Basic EPS
   Shares                        9,355,737     9,260,586              9,339,761      9,248,497
   EPS                               $0.44         $0.45                  $1.33          $1.34

Dilutive Shares
   Stock options                    46,861       114,771                 54,843        113,594
   EPS                               $0.00         $0.01                  $0.01          $0.02

Diluted EPS
   Shares including options      9,402,598     9,375,357              9,394,604      9,362,091
   EPS                               $0.44         $0.44                  $1.32          $1.32

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

</TABLE>


                                       36
#### David Paul GONZALEZ, Petitioner — Appellant, v. Jackie CRAWFORD; Frankie Sue Del Papa, Respondents — Appellees.

No. 05-16130.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted Feb. 16, 2006.*

Decided Feb. 23, 2006.

Victor Hugo Schulze, II, Esq., Office of the Nevada Attorney General, Las Vegas, NV, for Respondents-Appellees.

Michael D. Powell, Esq., Federal Public Defender’s Office, Reno, NV, for Petitioner-Appellant.

*850Before: WALLACE, HAWKINS, and THOMAS, Circuit Judges.

*

 This panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. *See*Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

MEMORANDUM: **

Gonzalez appeals from the district court’s order denying habeas relief. Gonzalez pled guilty to second degree murder in 1997. The district court granted a certificate of appealability on two issues, but Gonzalez pursued only one: Gonzalez seeks an evidentiary hearing on his claim that his counsel was ineffective because he “failed to properly advise him of the consequences of his plea and to effectively communicate with him and ensure that he could effectively communicate with the court.” Gonzalez is hearing and speech impaired. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2258, and we affirm.

The State correctly argues that Gonzalez failed to exhaust his present claim before the Nevada state courts. While Gonzalez did present an ineffective assistance of counsel claim to the state courts, that argument was based upon his “attorney failing] to state[ ] to the court that [Gonzalez] was mentally ill and suffered] from a lot of head pains.” This argument bears little resemblance to the current claim. The Supreme Court has held that:

> 28 U.S.C. § 2254 requires a federal habeas petitioner to provide the state courts with a “fair opportunity” to apply controlling legal principles to the facts bearing upon his constitutional claim. It is not enough that all the facts necessary to support the federal claim were before the state courts.... [T]he habeas petitioner must have “fairly presented” to the state courts the “substance” of his federal habeas corpus claim.

*Anderson v. Harless,*459 U.S. 4, 6, 103 S.Ct. 276, 74 L.Ed.2d 3 (1982) (citations omitted).

Under this standard, it is clear that Gonzalez failed to exhaust the present argument in the state courts. Because Gonzalez failed to exhaust his state remedies, we must affirm the district court’s denial of habeas relief. *See*28 U.S.C. § 2254(b)(1).

AFFIRMED.

**

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.
### §2335. Exception relating to importation of goods

#### (a) In general

The authorities and requirements to impose sanctions under this chapter shall not include the authority or a requirement to impose sanctions on the importation of goods.

#### (b) Good defined

In this section, the term "good" means any article, natural or manmade substance, material, supply, or manufactured product, including inspection and test equipment, and excluding technical data.

(Pub. L. 116–92, div. F, title LXXII, §7235, Dec. 20, 2019, 133 Stat. 2275.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

This chapter, referred to in subsec. (a), was in the original "this title", meaning title LXXII of div. F of Pub. L. 116–92, known as the Fentanyl Sanctions Act, which is classified principally to this chapter. For complete classification of this Act to the Code, see Short Title note set out under section 2301 of this title and Tables.
(No. 74-CC-306

#### IBM Corporation, Claimant, *vs.*State of Illinois, Office of the Lieutenant Governor, Respondent.

*Opinion filed February 20, 1974.*

IBM Corporation, Claimant, pro se.

William J. Scott, Attorney General; William E. Webber, Assistant Attorney General, for Respondent.

Per Curiam.
### **CHAPTER 4—ANIMALS, MEATS, AND MEAT AND DAIRY PRODUCTS**

#### SUBCHAPTER I—EXAMINATION OF ANIMALS, MEATS, AND MEAT AND DAIRY PRODUCTS

Sec.
71 to 99.
Transferred, Repealed, or Omitted.

#### SUBCHAPTER II—IMPORTATION OF CATTLE AND QUARANTINE

101.
Suspension of importation of all animals.
102 to 107. Repealed or Omitted.

#### SUBCHAPTER III—PREVENTION OF INTRODUCTION AND SPREAD OF CONTAGION

111 to 113. Repealed or Omitted.
113a.
Establishment of research laboratories for foot-and-mouth disease and other animal diseases; research contracts; employment of technicians and scientists; appropriations.
114 to 114h. Repealed.
114i.
Pseudorabies eradication.
115 to 135b. Repealed, Omitted, or Transferred.
136.
Additional inspection services.
136a.
Collection of fees for inspection services.

#### SUBCHAPTER IV—IMPORTATION OF MILK AND CREAM

141.
Prohibition of importation without permit.
142.
Milk or cream when unfit for importation.
143.
Inspection; certified statement in lieu thereof; waiver of requirements of section 142; regulations; suspension and revocation of permits.
144.
Unlawful receiving of imported milk or cream.
145.
Penalties.
146.
Authorization of appropriations.
147.
Repeal of inconsistent laws.
148.
Powers of State with respect to milk or cream lawfully imported.
149.
Definitions.
### §1384. Transfer of shares of corporations owning agricultural lands; consideration; indemnification

Immediately upon passage of this subchapter the Alien Property Custodian of the United States shall enter into an agreement with the President of the Philippines to transfer to the Philippine Government for a nominal cash consideration all shares now vested or hereafter vested by the Alien Property Custodian of corporations owning in fee, leasing, or otherwise operating or controlling agricultural lands in the Philippines, other agricultural lands in the Philippines, vested or hereafter vested by the Alien Property Custodian not included in the foregoing, and improved property in Manila vested or hereafter vested by the Alien Property Custodian which in his judgment is urgently needed for the operation of an administrative agency of the Philippine Government: Provided, That in respect to property transferred under this section to the Philippine Government, it shall be made a part of the agreement that the Philippine Government shall fully indemnify the United States for all claims payable under the Trading With the Enemy Act, as amended [50 U.S.C. 4301 et seq.], and for all such costs and expenses of administration as may by law be charged against such property or proceeds thereof.

(July 3, 1946, ch. 536, §5, 60 Stat. 419.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

The Trading With the Enemy Act, as amended, referred to in text, is act Oct. 6, 1917, ch. 106, 40 Stat. 411, which is classified generally to chapter 53 (§4301 et seq.) of Title 50, War and National Defense. For complete classification of this Act to the Code, see Tables.