Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 73 / Friday, April 15, 2011 / Notices 21333 

1Petitioners are the Laminated Woven Sacks 

Committee and its individual members, Coating 

Excellence International, LLC and Polytex Fibers 

Corporation. 

2See Letter from Aifudi entitled Laminated 

Woven Sacks from China; Withdrawal from 

Proceeding, dated November 3, 2010. 

3AMS Associates, Inc., operating as Shapiro 

Packaging (‘‘AMS’’), importer of products produced 

by Aifudi. 

4 ‘‘Paper suitable for high quality print graphics,’’ 

as used herein, means paper having an ISO 

brightness of 82 or higher and a Sheffield 

Smoothness of 250 or less. Coated free sheet is an 

example of a paper suitable for high quality print 

graphics. 

Additional time is needed to gather and 

analyze a significant amount of 

information pertaining to sales 

practices, manufacturing costs and 

corporate relationships pertaining to 

each company participating in the 

review as well as the company 

requesting revocation. Given the 

number and complexity of issues in this 

case, in accordance with section 

751(a)(3)(A) of the Act, we are fully 

extending by 120 days the time period 

for issuing the preliminary results of 

review. Therefore, the preliminary 

results are now due no later than August 

31, 2011. The final results continue to 

be due 120 days after publication of the 

preliminary results. 

This notice is published pursuant to 

sections 751(a)(3)(A) and 777(i)(1) of the 

Act. 

Dated: April 11, 2011. 

Gary Taverman, 

Acting Deputy Assistant Secretary for 

Antidumping and Countervailing Duty 

Operations. 

[FR Doc. 2011–9231 Filed 4–14–11; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P 

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE 

International Trade Administration 

[A–570–916] 

Laminated Woven Sacks From the 

People’s Republic of China: Final 

Results of Second Antidumping Duty 

Administrative Review 

AGENCY: Import Administration, 

International Trade Administration, 

Department of Commerce. 

SUMMARY: On December 27, 2010, the 

Department of Commerce 

(‘‘Department’’) published in the Federal 

Register the preliminary results of the 

second administrative review of the 

antidumping duty order on laminated 

woven sacks from the People’s Republic 

of China (‘‘PRC’’). See Laminated Woven 

Sacks From the People’s Republic of 

China: Preliminary Results of the 

Second Administrative Review, 75 FR 

81218 (December 27, 2010) 

(‘‘Preliminary Results’’). We gave 

interested parties an opportunity to 

comment on the Preliminary Results. 

Based upon our analysis of the 

comments and information received, no 

changes have been made for the final 

results. We continue to find that the 

PRC-wide entity has sold subject 

merchandise at less than normal value 

during the period of review (‘‘POR’’), 

August 1, 2009, through July 31, 2010. 

DATES: Effective Date: April 15, 2011. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Jamie Blair-Walker, AD/CVD 

Operations, Office 9, Import 

Administration, International Trade 

Administration, U.S. Department of 

Commerce, 14th Street and Constitution 

Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 20230; 

telephone: (202) 482–2615. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Background 

On September 29, 2010, the 

Department initiated this review with 

respect to one company. See Initiation 

of Antidumping and Countervailing 

Duty Administrative Reviews and 

Requests for Revocation in Part, 75 FR 

60076 (September 29, 2010). The review 

was initiated with respect to Zibo 

Aifudi Plastic Packaging Co., Ltd. 

(‘‘Aifudi’’) upon the self-request of 

Aifudi and the request of Petitioners.1

On November 3, 2010, Aifudi submitted 

a letter notifying the Department of its 

intent to withdraw and refusal to further 

participate in the ongoing 

administrative review.2 Petitioners did 

not withdraw their request for an 

administrative review of Aifudi. 

Therefore, the Department did not 

rescind the review with respect to 

Aifudi. 

In the Preliminary Results, we set the 

deadline for interested parties to submit 

case briefs and rebuttal briefs to January 

26, 2011, and January 31, 2011, 

respectively. Due to the early closure of 

the Department resulting from 

inclement weather on January 26, 2011, 

AMS 3 filed a case brief on the morning 

of the next business day, January 27, 

2011. Subsequently, the Department 

extended the deadline for rebuttal briefs 

by one day, to February 1, 2011. 

Petitioners filed a rebuttal brief on 

February 1, 2011. The Department did 

not hold a public hearing pursuant to 19 

CFR 351.310(d), as no interested parties 

requested a hearing. 

Analysis of Comments Received 

All issues raised in the case and 

rebuttal briefs by parties to these 

reviews are addressed in the ‘‘Laminated 

Woven Sacks from the People’s 

Republic of China: Issues and Decision 

Memorandum for the Final Results of 

the Second Antidumping Duty 

Administrative Review’’ (‘‘Decision 

Memo’’), which is dated concurrently 

with this notice. A list of the issues 

which parties raised and to which we 

respond in the Decision Memo is 

attached to this notice as an Appendix. 

The Decision Memo is a public 

document and is on file in the Central 

Records Unit, Main Commerce Building, 

Room 7046, and is accessible on the 

Department’s Web site at 

http://www.trade.gov/ia. The paper 

copy and electronic version of the 

memorandum are identical in content. 

Scope of the Order 

The merchandise covered by the order 

is laminated woven sacks. Laminated 

woven sacks are bags or sacks consisting 

of one or more plies of fabric consisting 

of woven polypropylene strip and/or 

woven polyethylene strip, regardless of 

the width of the strip; with or without 

an extrusion coating of polypropylene 

and/or polyethylene on one or both 

sides of the fabric; laminated by any 

method either to an exterior ply of 

plastic film such as biaxially-oriented 

polypropylene (‘‘BOPP’’) or to an 

exterior ply of paper that is suitable for 

high quality print graphics; 4 printed 

with three colors or more in register; 

with or without lining; whether or not 

closed on one end; whether or not in 

roll form (including sheets, lay-flat 

tubing, and sleeves); with or without 

handles; with or without special closing 

features; not exceeding one kilogram in 

weight. Laminated woven sacks are 

typically used for retail packaging of 

consumer goods such as pet foods and 

bird seed. 

Effective July 1, 2007, laminated 

woven sacks are classifiable under 

Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the 

United States (‘‘HTSUS’’) subheadings 

6305.33.0050 and 6305.33.0080. 

Laminated woven sacks were previously 

classifiable under HTSUS subheading 

6305.33.0020. If entered with plastic 

coating on both sides of the fabric 

consisting of woven polypropylene strip 

and/or woven polyethylene strip, 

laminated woven sacks may be 

classifiable under HTSUS subheadings 

3923.21.0080, 3923.21.0095, and 

3923.29.0000. If entered not closed on 

one end or in roll form (including 

sheets, lay-flat tubing, and sleeves), 

laminated woven sacks may be 

classifiable under other HTSUS 

subheadings including 3917.39.0050, 

3921.90.1100, 3921.90.1500, and 

5903.90.2500. If the polypropylene 


srobinson on DSKHWCL6B1PROD with NOTICES
21334 Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 73 / Friday, April 15, 2011 / Notices 

5See Laminated Woven Sacks from the People’s 

Republic of China: Final Determination of Sales at 

Less Than Fair Value and Partial Affirmative 

Determination of Critical Circumstances, 73 FR 

35646 (June 24, 2008). 

6See Preliminary Results, 75 FR at 81220–21. 

7The PRC-Wide entity includes Zibo Aifudi 

Plastic Packaging Co., Ltd. 

strips and/or polyethylene strips making 

up the fabric measure more than 5 

millimeters in width, laminated woven 

sacks may be classifiable under other 

HTSUS subheadings including 

4601.99.0500, 4601.99.9000, and 

4602.90.0000. Although HTSUS 

subheadings are provided for 

convenience and customs purposes, the 

written description of the scope of the 

order is dispositive. 

Changes Since the Preliminary Results 

In the Preliminary Results, we 

determined that the use of adverse facts 

available (‘‘AFA’’) is appropriate as the 

basis for the weighted-average dumping 

margin assigned to the PRC-wide entity, 

which includes Aifudi. There have been 

no changes since the Preliminary 

Results. Therefore, for the final results, 

we have adopted our positions in the 

Preliminary Results. Thus, the 

Department continues to find that the 

application of total AFA is warranted 

for the PRC-wide entity pursuant to 

sections 776(a)(2)(A) and (C) and 776(b) 

of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended 

(‘‘the Act’’). 

Use of Adverse Facts Available 

In accordance with section 776(b) of 

the Act, we determine that the use of 

AFA as the basis for the weightedaverage dumping margin is appropriate 

for the PRC-wide entity. As explained in 

the Preliminary Results, Aifudi 

withdrew its participation from this 

administrative review, did not submit 

any information on the record regarding 

its separate rate status, and did not 

respond to requests for information from 

the Department. As such, Aifudi has not 

rebutted the presumption of PRC 

government control and does not qualify 

for a separate rate. Therefore, the 

Department continues to find that 

Aifudi should be treated as part of the 

PRC-wide entity. 

Because we have determined that 

Aifudi is part of the PRC-wide entity, 

the PRC-wide entity is under review. 

Pursuant to section 776(a)(2)(A) and (C) 

of the Act, we find that Aifudi failed to 

respond to the Department’s 

questionnaires, withheld information 

requested by the Department, and 

impeded the conduct of this review. 

Accordingly, the Department continues 

to find that it is appropriate to base the 

dumping margin of the PRC-wide entity 

on the facts otherwise available on the 

record. Further, because Aifudi’s failure 

to provide the requested information 

constitutes circumstances under which 

it is reasonable to conclude that less 

than full cooperation has been shown, 

pursuant to section 776(b) of the Act, 

the Department has determined that, 

when selecting from among the facts 

otherwise available, an adverse 

inference is warranted with respect to 

the PRC-wide entity. 

As AFA, we have applied the highest 

dumping margin on the record of any 

segment of this proceeding, which is 

91.73 percent.5 Furthermore, as required 

by section 776(c) of the Act, we 

corroborated this margin with respect to 

the PRC-wide entity, to the extent 

practicable. For a detailed explanation 

of how we corroborated this margin, see 

Preliminary Results.6

Final Results of Review 

The weighted-average dumping 

margins for the POR are as follows: 

Exporter Weighted average 

percent margin 

PRC-Wide Entity 7 ........ 91.73 

Assessment 

Pursuant to section 751(a)(2)(A) of the 

Act and 19 CFR 351.212(b), the 

Department will determine, and U.S. 

Customs and Border Protection (‘‘CBP’’) 

shall assess, antidumping duties on all 

appropriate entries of subject 

merchandise in accordance with the 

final results of this review. For 

assessment purposes, we calculated 

importer (or customer)-specific 

assessment rates for merchandise 

subject to this review. Where 

appropriate, we calculated an ad 

valorem rate for each importer (or 

customer) by dividing the total dumping 

margins for reviewed sales to that party 

by the total entered values associated 

with those transactions. For dutyassessment rates calculated on this 

basis, we will direct CBP to assess the 

resulting ad valorem rate against the 

entered customs values for the subject 

merchandise. Where appropriate, we 

calculated a per-unit rate for each 

importer (or customer) by dividing the 

total dumping margins for reviewed 

sales to that party by the total sales 

quantity associated with those 

transactions. For duty-assessment rates 

calculated on this basis, we will direct 

CBP to assess the resulting per-unit rate 

against the entered quantity of the 

subject merchandise. Where an importer 

(or customer)-specific assessment rate is 

de minimis (i.e., less than 0.50 percent), 

the Department will instruct CBP to 

assess that importer (or customer’s) 

entries of subject merchandise without 

regard to antidumping duties, in 

accordance with 19 CFR 351.106(c)(2). 

The Department intends to issue 

assessment instructions to CBP 15 days 

after the date of publication of these 

final results of review. 

Cash Deposit Requirements 

The following cash deposit 

requirements will be effective upon 

publication of the final results of this 

administrative review for all shipments 

of the subject merchandise entered, or 

withdrawn from warehouse, for 

consumption on or after the publication 

date, as provided for by section 

751(a)(2)(C) of the Act: (1) For Aifudi, 

the cash deposit rate will be the rate as 

listed above in the ‘‘Final Results of 

Review’’ section of this notice; (2) for 

previously investigated or reviewed PRC 

and non-PRC exporters not listed above 

that have separate rates, the cash 

deposit rate will continue to be the 

exporter-specific rate published for the 

most recent period; (3) for all PRC 

exporters of subject merchandise which 

have not been found to be entitled to a 

separate rate, the cash deposit rate will 

be the PRC-wide rate of 91.73 percent; 

and (4) for all non-PRC exporters of 

subject merchandise which have not 

received their own rate, the cash deposit 

rate will be the rate applicable to the 

PRC exporters that supplied that nonPRC exporter. These deposit 

requirements, when imposed, shall 

remain in effect until further notice. 

Reimbursement of Duties 

This notice also serves as a final 

reminder to importers of their 

responsibility under 19 CFR 351.402(f) 

to file a certificate regarding the 

reimbursement of antidumping duties 

prior to liquidation of the relevant 

entries during this POR. Failure to 

comply with this requirement could 

result in the Department’s presumption 

that reimbursement of antidumping 

duties has occurred and the subsequent 

assessment of doubled antidumping 

duties. 

Administrative Protective Orders 

This notice also serves as a reminder 

to parties subject to administrative 

protective order (‘‘APO’’) of their 

responsibility concerning the return or 

destruction of proprietary information 

disclosed under APO in accordance 

with 19 CFR 351.305, which continues 

to govern business proprietary 

information in this segment of the 

proceeding. Timely written notification 

of the return/destruction of APO 

materials or conversion to judicial 


srobinson on DSKHWCL6B1PROD with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 73 / Friday, April 15, 2011 / Notices 21335 

protective order is hereby requested. 

Failure to comply with the regulations 

and terms of an APO is a violation 

which is subject to sanction. 

We are issuing and publishing this 

administrative review and notice in 

accordance with sections 751(a)(1) and 

777(i) of the Act. 

Dated: April 8, 2011. 

Ronald K. Lorentzen, 

Deputy Assistant Secretary for Import 

Administration. 

Appendix I—Issues and Decision 

Memorandum 

Comment 1: Decision Regarding Country of 

Origin 

1a. Procedures in Determining Country of 

Origin 

1b. Authority to Issue Instructions to CBP 

Comment 2: Whether to Reject AMS’ Case 

Brief 

[FR Doc. 2011–9230 Filed 4–14–11; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P 

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE 

National Oceanic and Atmospheric 

Administration 

Science Advisory Board; Notice of 

Public Meeting 

AGENCY: Office of Oceanic and 

Atmospheric Research (OAR), National 

Oceanic and Atmospheric 

Administration (NOAA), Department of 

Commerce (DOC). 

ACTION: Notice of public meeting. 

SUMMARY: This notice sets forth the 

schedule and proposed agenda of a 

forthcoming meeting of the NOAA 

Science Advisory Board. The members 

will discuss and provide advice on 

issues outlined in the agenda below. 

DATES: The meeting is scheduled for: 

Monday, May 16, from 3–5 p.m. Eastern 

Daylight Time. 

ADDRESSES: Conference call. Public 

access is available at: NOAA, SSMC 3, 

Room 12836, 1315 East-West Highway, 

Silver Spring, MD. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Dr. 

Cynthia Decker, Executive Director, 

Science Advisory Board, NOAA, Rm. 

11230, 1315 East-West Highway, Silver 

Spring, Maryland 20910. (Phone: 301– 

734–1156, Fax: 301–713–1459, E-mail: 

Cynthia.Decker@noaa.gov) 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The 

Science Advisory Board (SAB) was 

established by a Decision Memorandum 

dated September 25, 1997, and is the 

only Federal Advisory Committee with 

responsibility to advise the Under 

Secretary of Commerce for Oceans and 

Atmosphere on strategies for research, 

education, and application of science to 

operations and information services. 

SAB activities and advice provide 

necessary input to ensure that National 

Oceanic and Atmospheric 

Administration (NOAA) science 

programs are of the highest quality and 

provide optimal support to resource 

management. 

Matters To Be Considered: The agenda 

for the meeting is as follows: 

Date and Time: Monday, May 16 from 

3–5 p.m. Eastern Daylight Time. 

Status: The meeting will be open to 

public participation at NOAA, SSMC 3, 

Room 12836, 1315 East-West Highway, 

Silver Spring, MD. with a 5-minute 

public comment period from 4:50–4:55 

p.m. The SAB expects that public 

statements presented at its meetings will 

not be repetitive of previously 

submitted verbal or written statements. 

In general, each individual or group 

making a verbal presentation will be 

limited to a total time of one minute. 

Written comments should be received in 

the SAB Executive Director’s Office by 

May 11, 2011 to provide sufficient time 

for SAB review. Written comments 

received by the SAB Executive Director 

after May 11, 2011, will be distributed 

to the SAB, but may not be reviewed 

prior to the meeting date. 

Agenda 

1. Recommendations on Coastal and 

Marine Spatial Planning from the 

Ecosystem Sciences and Management 

Working Group. 

2. Discussion of a Revised Concept of 

Operations Document for SAB Working 

Groups and Task Forces. 

Dated: April 11, 2011. 

Mark E. Brown, 

Chief Financial Officer/Chief Administrative 

Officer, Office of Oceanic and Atmospheric 

Research, National Oceanic and Atmospheric 

Administration. 

[FR Doc. 2011–9201 Filed 4–14–11; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 3510–KD–P 

COMMITTEE FOR PURCHASE FROM 

PEOPLE WHO ARE BLIND OR 

SEVERELY DISABLED 

Procurement List Additions and 

Deletions 

AGENCY: Committee for Purchase From 

People Who Are Blind or Severely 

Disabled. 

ACTION: Additions to and deletions from 

the procurement list. 

SUMMARY: This action adds products and 

services to the Procurement List that 

will be furnished by nonprofit agencies 

employing persons who are blind or 

have other severe disabilities, and 

deletes products and services from the 

Procurement List previously furnished 

by such agencies. 

DATES: Effective Date: May 16, 2011. 

ADDRESSES: Committee for Purchase 

From People Who Are Blind or Severely 

Disabled, Jefferson Plaza 2, Suite 10800, 

1421 Jefferson Davis Highway, 

Arlington, Virginia 22202–3259. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Barry S. Lineback, Telephone: (703) 

603–7740, Fax: (703) 603–0655, or email CMTEFedReg@AbilityOne.gov. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Additions 

On 1/14/2011 (76 FR 2673–2674); 1/ 

28/2011 (76 FR 5142–5143); 2/4/2011 

(76 FR 6451–6452); and 2/11/2011 (76 

FR 7824–7825), the Committee for 

Purchase From People Who Are Blind 

or Severely Disabled published notices 

of proposed additions to the 

Procurement List. 

After consideration of the material 

presented to it concerning capability of 

qualified nonprofit agencies to provide 

the products and services and impact of 

the additions on the current or most 

recent contractors, the Committee has 

determined that the products and 

services listed below are suitable for 

procurement by the Federal Government 

under 41 U.S.C. 46–48c and 41 CFR 51– 

2.4. 

Regulatory Flexibility Act Certification 

I certify that the following action will 

not have a significant impact on a 

substantial number of small entities. 

The major factors considered for this 

certification were: 

1. The action will not result in any 

additional reporting, recordkeeping or 

other compliance requirements for small 

entities other than the small 

organizations that will furnish the 

products and services to the 

Government. 

2. The action will result in 

authorizing small entities to furnish the 

products and services to the 

Government. 

3. There are no known regulatory 

alternatives which would accomplish 

the objectives of the Javits-WagnerO’Day Act (41 U.S.C. 46–48c) in 

connection with the products and 

services proposed for addition to the 

Procurement List. 

End of Certification 

Accordingly, the following products 

and services are added to the 

Procurement List: 

Products 

NSN: 8465–00–NIB–0211—Pouch, Four 3- 


srobinson on DSKHWCL6B1PROD with NOTICES