# EUR-Lex - 52013DC0454 - EN

*|*

# 52013DC0454

**COMMUNICATION FROM THE COMMISSION TO THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT, THE COUNCIL, THE EUROPEAN ECONOMIC AND SOCIAL COMMITTEE AND THE COMMITTEE OF THE REGIONS STEPS FORWARD IN IMPLEMENTING NATIONAL ROMA INTEGRATION STRATEGIES /* COM/2013/0454 final */**

			*

			*

COMMUNICATION FROM THE COMMISSION TO
THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT, THE COUNCIL, THE EUROPEAN ECONOMIC AND SOCIAL
COMMITTEE AND THE COMMITTEE OF THE REGIONS

STEPS FORWARD IN IMPLEMENTING NATIONAL
ROMA INTEGRATION STRATEGIES

1.           Introduction

The Commission's Communication An EU
Framework for National Roma Integration Strategies[1] called on Member States
to adopt or further develop a comprehensive approach to Roma integration and
endorse a number of common goals. These goals cover the four pillars of education,
employment, health and housing and aim to speed up the integration of Roma. The
Heads of State or Government of all EU Member States endorsed this approach.[2]

In response to this call, the Member States
presented national Roma integration strategies. The national strategies varied according
to the size of the Roma population and the challenges Member States needed to
address[3].
The European Commission assessed these strategies[4] in 2012 and concluded that, to
make progress on the four pillars, it was necessary to prioritise on several structural
pre-conditions that are indispensable for a successful implementation of the
strategies, and amongst them: working with local and regional authorities and
civil society; allocating proportionate financial resources; monitoring and
enabling policy adjustment; fighting discrimination convincingly; and
establishing national contact points for Roma integration.

The present communication  focuses on these
structural pre-conditions as, although some steps have been taken at policy
level in the Member States, in particular to better coordinate all stakeholders
active on Roma integration, effective changes are still insufficient. Furthermore,
to encourage further efforts by the Member States, the Commission commits, with
this communication , to provide additional support to the Member States notably
on their use of EU funds for Roma integration.

2.           The Effective Implementation
of Strategies — Crucial for the Credibility of Political Commitments and for Grassroots
Change

Ensuring the effective implementation of the
national Roma integration strategies is crucial. In the current economic
context, it is essential to take adequate measures and use available resources
more efficiently to address the socio-economic integration of Roma. This is why
the Commission follows progress made by the Member States closely, both within
the Europe 2020 process and in the specific context of the EU Framework for
national Roma integration strategies.

As part of the Europe 2020 process, close
monitoring of Roma inclusion and its coherence with mainstream policies will
continue on an annual basis up to 2020. To make progress towards the Europe
2020 employment, social inclusion and education targets, Member States with
larger Roma populations will have to tackle the challenges of Roma inclusion
highlighted in the 2012 European Semester. In these Member States, integrating
Roma people will not only bring social, but also economic benefits.[5] In the 2013 European Semester the
Commission has proposed to strengthen and further refine recommendations
relevant for Roma inclusion for the most concerned Member States[6].

In the context of the EU Framework for national
Roma integration strategies, the Commission strengthened dialogue with a number
of Member States. Bilateral meetings took place in 2012 and 2013[7], bringing together the relevant
national authorities and experts from the Commission to discuss the detailed
assessment of the national Roma integration strategies and ways to ensure their
effective implementation.

In addition, a network of the Member States’
National Contact Points for Roma integration was set up to facilitate multilateral
exchanges of experience, peer learning and cooperation among the Member States[8].

Finally, to help Member States measure progress
on Roma integration, the European Union Agency for Fundamental Rights (FRA) set
up an ad hoc working group[9].
Its main objective is to help participating Member States set up effective
monitoring mechanisms to obtain reliable and comparable results[10].

The Commission has analysed the progress made
in 2012 in implementing national strategies on the basis of Member States'
input, and contributions from experts and civil society[11], as well as findings brought
out by the FRA.

2.1.        Structural
pre-conditions for efficient implementation

(a)
Involving regional and local authorities and working
closely with civil society

The EU Framework highlighted the need for a
continuous dialogue between national, regional and local authorities and Roma
civil society in designing, implementing and monitoring national strategies. Most
Member States took measures in this respect. However, they were often perceived
as ineffective by stakeholders in terms of enabling them to actively participate
in the implementation and monitoring of national strategies.

(1)
Involving local and regional authorities

As highlighted in the Commission’s 2012 progress
report, the active involvement of local and regional authorities at all stages
of the Roma inclusion process is a crucial pre-condition for success.

Involving local and regional authorities || Member States that have taken such measures

Structured dialogue set up || AT, BE, BG, CZ, DK, EE, EL, ES, FI, FR, HU, IE, IT, LV, NL, RO, SE, SI, SK, UK

Promotion of exchange of experience and cooperation among local authorities || BE, BG,CZ, DK, FI, FR, HU, IT, SE, ES, SI, UK

Allocation of resources for Roma integration to local and regional authorities || AT, BE, CZ, DE, DK, EL, FI, FR, IE, IT, PL, RO (planned), SE, SI, SK,

A year later, it can be concluded that most
Member States need to make further efforts and involve
local authorities more closely and systematically in developing, implementing,
monitoring, evaluating and reviewing policy[12]. Roma integration policies and
action plans should be developed as an integral part of regional and local
public agendas: they should set a clear baseline, quantified targets and
specific measures so as to translate the four pillars of the national Roma
integration strategy into action at the local level. To implement these plans,
local and regional authorities should be given appropriate financial and human
resources. Their capacity to manage, monitor and
evaluate Roma inclusion should be improved.

(2)
Working closely with civil society

The Commission's 2012 progress report pointed out
that involving civil society should go beyond merely consulting it when developing
strategies. Civil society needs to play an active role in implementing and
monitoring national strategies. The capacity building of grassroots civil
society at local level, in particular among Roma, is crucial for the success
and sustainability of integrated local action plans.

Working closely with civil society || Member States that have taken such measures

Structured dialogue with civil society set up at national level || BE, BG, EE, ES, DK, FI, FR, HU, LV, LT, SE, SI, UK

Encouraging the active involvement of civil society and Roma representatives at local level || BE (regional level), BG, CZ, ES, FI, HU, LV, PT, SE, SI,

Financial support for developing the capacity of civil society || EE, ES, FR, LV, SE, SI

In the second year of implementation of the national
strategies in most Member States, the legitimate representation of Roma and the
involvement of all the relevant civil society organisations remain insufficient.
To be able to provide a meaningful contribution, civil society organisations,
in particular local organisations representing Roma, must have the appropriate
capacity to better access public funding, to
help making it available swiftly and effectively to those directly concerned,
and to effectively participate in the development, implementation and monitoring
process of Roma integration policies. Only a few Member States provide adequate support for
civil society organisations to play such a role. Although mechanisms are in
place to incorporate the views of Roma, they do not ensure a significant impact
of these views on policies. All Member States should ensure that regular
consultation mechanisms operate efficiently and transparently and that they cover
the implementation, monitoring and evaluation of the impact of the strategies. Dialogue should be encouraged across various kinds of
civil society organisations and researchers working in all areas relevant for
Roma inclusion. Co-operation with civil society should also be encouraged when
setting up local action plans.

(b)
Allocating proportionate financial resources

The EU Framework invited Member States to
allocate sufficient funding for Roma inclusion measures from national budgets,
to be complemented, where appropriate, by EU and international funding,
co-funding from EU funds is available mainly from the European Social Fund, the
European Regional Development Fund, and the European Agricultural Fund for
Rural Development.

In the Commission’s 2012 progress report,
weaknesses in allocating financial resources matching the policy commitments
made in the strategies remained a major obstacle to implementation. Specific,
transparent budgetary allocation for the action plans is an absolute
pre-condition. In addition, a territorial approach should be used, addressing
the specific needs of those areas most affected by poverty or target groups at the
greatest risk of discrimination or exclusion.

Allocating proportionate financial resources || Member States that have taken such measures

Integrated approach to allocating financial resources || EL, ES, FI, HU, IT, LV, SI, SK,

Territorial approach to allocating financial resources || CZ, EL, ES, HU, IT, PL, SE, SK

Involvement of local and regional authorities and civil society in planning the use of EU funds || BE, BG, CZ, ES, FI, IT, RO, SI, SK (initial steps)

Although some progress has been made since the
previous report, the financing of national strategies is not yet adequate. In
some Member States, the implementation of the national strategy is delayed
because insufficient resources are allocated from the national budget.

Reflecting the challenges identified in the
European Semester exercise, all Member States should ensure that appropriate
measures are taken to include Roma integration in the Partnership Agreements on
the use of European Structural and Investment Funds[13] for the period 2014–2020 in
proportion to the size and situation of their Roma communities. Key policy
priorities for Roma inclusion have been highlighted in the country-specific
recommendations within the European Semester and Commission position papers for
the negotiation of Partnership Agreements with several Member States. National
budgetary commitments remain essential to ensure the sustainability of Roma
inclusion measures.

The European Social Fund is the main EU
financial instrument for investment in Roma inclusion in the fields of
employment, education and social inclusion. The European Regional Development
Fund has invested in housing as part of an integrated approach in a number of
Member States, yet in most cases this funding possibility for Roma inclusion
could be further exploited. To this aim, the Member States could draw on the pools
of skills and resources developed by coalitions of international organisations aiming
to support projects for Roma inclusion at local level.

The Commission proposals for EU cohesion policy
in 2014-2020 provide the basis for an integrated approach combining the
financing possibilities of the ERDF and the ESF in order to achieve the EU Roma
integration goals. Member States should also envisage using support
possibilities made available under rural development policy. Furthermore, the
Commission Communication Towards Social Investment for Growth and Cohesion[14] urged
Member States to use EU resources for social investment during the next programming
period (2014–20). The Commission also proposed to allocate an adequate share of
EU cohesion funding to investment in people, employment and social policy
reforms through the European Social Fund (ESF)[15].
It also proposed that at least 20 % of this amount be allocated in each Member State to social inclusion, also including the integration of Roma. This would ensure
that the overall allocation of funding to social inclusion increases and better
reflects the challenges in this area. The Member States’ and regions’ use of
the new specific investment priority on the integration of marginalised
communities such as Roma within the European Social Fund (proposed by the
Commission for the programming period 2014-2020) will allow a better assessment
of what is spent on measures to integrate Roma.

(c)
Monitoring and enabling policy adjustment

The EU Framework invited the Member States to
set up sound monitoring and evaluation methods to assess the results and impacts
of Roma inclusion measures and enable policy adjustments where necessary. The
2012 report concluded that the Member States need to make stronger efforts in
this respect.

Monitoring transformation and enabling policy adjustment || Member States that have taken such measures

Mapping of the situation of Roma (‘baseline’) undertaken or under way || CZ, EE, EL, ES, FI, FR, HU, LT, LV, NL, PT, RO, SI, SK

A monitoring system to measure the results and impacts of the national strategy || Initial steps: BG Under development: BE, ES, FI, HU, IT, SE

Identification of areas with extremely poor Roma communities || CZ, EE, EL, FR, HU, PL, RO, SK

Involvement of all major stakeholders in the monitoring and evaluation process || AT, CZ (planned), FI, HU, IT (planned), LT (planned), SE (partially), SI, SK (planned)

Cooperation established with National Statistical Offices || BG, CZ, EL, ES, FI, HU, IT, LV, RO, SK, UK

Planned regular reporting and evaluation || BE, BG, CZ, EL, FI, HU, LT, PL, RO, SE, SI, SK

Despite clear efforts since the last report[16] to put in place a robust
monitoring and evaluation framework to systematically and consistently produce
data (not necessarily using ethnic criteria) on the impact of Roma
integration measures, this remains a challenge in most Member States. As
highlighted by the working group on monitoring set up by the FRA, a monitoring
system should be able to provide accurate feedback to governments at various
levels: on the one hand, on progress towards the goals in the national strategy
and in the local action plans; and on the other
hand, on improvements in the socio-economic situation of Roma and in their
fundamental rights compared to the majority population (monitoring ‘the gap’).

There is a great need to regularly compare
data to rigorously evaluate the impact of the measures
on the ground against the baseline. In particular,
there is still a general lack of impact indicators. In addition, in most cases,
the extent to which other stakeholders are involved in monitoring, evaluation
and policy review, in line with the 10 Common Basic Principles for Roma
Inclusion[17],
is unclear. Possible synergies with existing EU policy indicators should be
explored.

(d)
Fighting discrimination convincingly

The EU Framework called on the Member States to
ensure that Roma are not discriminated against and that the respect of their
human rights enshrined in the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the EU and the European
Convention of Human Rights is guaranteed. The Commission's 2012 progress report
stated that Member States should ensure that anti-discrimination legislation[18] is effectively enforced in
their territories and that they fight discrimination convincingly. The report
also highlighted the significant number of Roma living in the Member States
that are legally staying third-country nationals, who face the same challenges
as migrants coming from outside the EU. They must enjoy the same rights as
those granted to other non-EU migrants.

Measures to fight discrimination || Member States that have taken such measures

Enforcing anti-discrimination legislation at local level || AT, DK, SE

Raising awareness (including in public administrations) || AT, BG, CZ, DK, EE, ES, FI, FR, HU, IE, IT, LV, LT, PT, RO, SI

Increasing awareness among Roma of their rights || AT, FI, LV, SE, SI

Tackling multiple forms of discrimination against Roma women || RO (initial steps)

Fighting against human trafficking and the labour exploitation of children || CZ, DK, HU, NL

Despite the
commitments made by the Member States and anti-discrimination legislation in
all Member States, racism towards and discrimination against Roma continue. The
segregation of Roma children in education is still widespread in several Member
States[19].
Civil society and academic reports[20]
confirm various examples of discrimination, including less favourable access to
education, health, police protection and housing compared to the majority
population. The persisting challenges of integrating Roma who are EU citizens
into their societies, continue to have a direct impact on wider EU relations
with third countries. For example, some countries apply visa requirements to
the nationals of certain Member States because of issues relating to Roma
integration[21].
The same challenges can arise for third-country national Roma who migrate to
the EU[22].

Without systemic measures to fight
discrimination and racism towards Roma, the implementation of the national Roma
integration strategies cannot yield the expected results. Most Member States carry
out awareness-raising activities to promote Roma inclusion[23]. At the same time, however,
public authorities should do much more to explain the social and economic
benefits[24]
of Roma inclusion to their societies at large. To step up the fight
against discrimination, it is also necessary to raise awareness about rights,
duties and opportunities among Roma themselves and ensure tools to protect and
enforce their rights, such as through Equality Bodies. The Member States
must do more to combat stereotyping and deal with racist or otherwise
stigmatising language or behaviour that may constitute incitement to
discrimination against Roma.

Member States should do more to effectively fight
child labour, prohibit begging involving children, fully enforce legislation on
underage marriages, fight forced marriages and deal more effectively with the
issue of human trafficking, including through international cooperation.

Addressing steadily and comprehensively the
lack of registration of Roma in national population registers, as well as the
lack of personal identity papers, where relevant, is an absolute pre-condition
for ensuring equal access to education, public services, social protection
systems, minimum living conditions, housing and healthcare.

(e)
National Contact Points for Roma integration

The EU Framework invited Member States to set up
National Contact Points for Roma integration[25]
(NCPs) with the authority to coordinate the development and implementation of
the strategy. The Commission's 2012 progress report stressed that these National
Contact Points should be fully enabled to effectively coordinate Roma inclusion
across policy areas.

Measures to enable the National Contact Points to work efficiently || Member States that have taken such measures

Coordination between sectors at national level || AT, BE, BG, CZ, EE, EL, ES, FI, FR, HU, IT, LT, LV, RO, SE, SK

Coordination among various levels of government (from national to local) || AT, BE, BG, DK, CZ, EE, ES, FI, FR, HU, IE, IT, LV, NL, RO, SE, SI, SK

Involvement of the National Contact Points in planning the use of EU funds || BE, BG, CZ, EL, ES, FI, HU, IE, IT, LT, SK

All National Contact Points participate in the
network set up in October 2012 and have real concerns regarding Roma
integration. Despite clear progress in developing their commitment and coordination
role, there is room for improvement with regard to their status, capacities,
resources, mandate and the political support they receive: National Contact
Points should be given appropriate human and financial resources; they must
have the formal authority and competence to coordinate processes across
ministries and various levels of government and ensure that Roma inclusion is
integrated into all relevant public policies; they should contribute to the
definition and implementation of relevant policies and be involved in the
strategic planning for the use of EU funds. They should also facilitate
dialogue and exchanges between all stakeholders and explore synergies with any
relevant initiatives[26].

3.           Enlargement countries

In its EU Enlargement Strategy 2012-2013 as
well as in the more detailed Progress Reports country by country, the
Commission highlights that Roma remain particularly disadvantaged across the
Western Balkans. In many countries discrimination remains to be addressed in terms
of access to education, employment, social and health care, housing and
personal documents.

Whilst some progress has been made over recent
years leading to some initial improvements in education and health, sustained
efforts are still needed. These include allocating appropriate resources for
implementing policies for Roma integration. Challenges remain in the effective
implementation and enforcement of the legal and institutional framework.
In several countries multiannual strategies for improving the situation of Roma
and related action plans have either been recently adopted (Montenegro and the Former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia) or reviewed and improved (Albania, Bosnia and Herzegovina, Kosovo and Serbia[27]).
  Turkey has still to develop a systematic approach and comprehensive strategy
to foster Roma integration.

Enlargement countries should continue to act
on the operational conclusions jointly agreed with the Commission at the 2011
national conferences. These conclusions are being
reviewed annually in the context of the structural policy dialogue. They
concern five issues: registration, education, health, access to work and
housing. The Commission stepped up its efforts in 2012 by providing targeted
financial assistance for the implementation of the operational conclusions in
several countries. Better use was made of the financial Instrument for
Pre-Accession Assistance (IPA) by providing more support measures aimed at
including Roma in society and improving their status and living conditions and by
helping countries develop, review and implement their national strategies,
under both national and regional programmes. The Commission will continue to
support policies and concrete measures aimed at improving the situation of
Roma, including measures under the Decade for Roma inclusion[28], as part of these countries'
EU accession processes.

4.           Conclusions — the way
forward

Two major conclusions can be drawn from assessing
the progress made by the Member States over the past year: some Member States
significantly rethought or developed their strategies in concrete terms, in
particular by seeking to organise horizontal and vertical dialogue as well as coordination
for the implementation of their strategies; however, some of the necessary
preconditions for successful implementation are still not in place and progress
is therefore very slow on the ground.

To speed up progress on Roma integration along
the four pillars of access to education, employment, healthcare and housing, the
Commission is offering additional support to the Member States by:

(a)
upholding the attainment by the Member States of
their policy goals and commitments

·
presenting in parallel with this Communication a
proposal for a Council Recommendation on enhancing the effectiveness of measures
to achieve Roma integration. The findings of the Commission’s 2012 progress report[29], of the high-level exchanges
with civil society and Roma representatives, and of this report led the
Commission to propose to Member States moving up a gear in Roma integration by
means of a legal instrument to be adopted by the Council;

·
pursuing bilateral and multilateral exchanges
with the National Contact Points for Roma integration and other national
authorities involved in the implementation of policy measures for Roma
inclusion;

·
further reviewing progress on Roma integration in
the context of the Europe 2020 Strategy, as Roma integration should be part of
Member States’ overall efforts to combat poverty and social exclusion, increase
employment, reduce school drop-out rates and increase educational attainment.

·
improving dialogue and cooperation between all
stakeholders through the next meeting of the European Platform for Roma Inclusion;

·
monitoring the implementation of the Race
Equality Directive in administrative practices.

(b)
providing support through EU funding

·
completing national resources by setting out a
framework for how EU funding[30]
(European Regional Development Fund (ERDF), European Social Fund (ESF) and
European Agricultural Fund for Rural Development (EAFRD)) could support the
inclusion of marginalised communities such as Roma in the Member States between
2014-20. Furthermore, use of private and third sector resources should be
promoted to increase the leverage on investment in Roma integration.

·
proposing that some Member State make use of the
investment priority "Integration of marginalised communities such as the
Roma" , or set specific objectives related to the labour market
integration, access to education or social inclusion of Roma people for the
next programming period to reflect the findings of the European Semester;

·
proposing a new social investment policy
framework[31],
based on three elements[32],
that could contribute to Roma inclusion.

The Commission invites the European Parliament
to participate actively in a debate on the proposal for a Council
Recommendation on enhancing the effectiveness of measures to achieve Roma
integration.

The Commission will report once a year in
spring – next report will be in 2014 – to the European Parliament and to the
Council on progress made on the four pillars of education, employment, health
and housing, based on information provided by the Member States, on data
collected by the EU Fundamental Rights Agency and on the contributions received
from civil society organisations. The annual reports will benchmark the efforts
made and progress achieved by Member States on Roma integration.

ANNEX
Examples of actions related to the structural pre-conditions of implementation

Example of the active involvement of local and regional authorities In Germany, the government of the State of Berlin adopted a strategy on Roma inclusion on 7 August 2012. It calls for the development of a regional action plan on Roma inclusion. A steering group was set up including different Senate Departments of the Berlin government and local authorities that deal with Roma migrants. Civil society helped develop this regional action plan[33].

Examples of working closely with civil society In France, a national monitoring group has been set up by the National Roma Contact Point. It brings together associations, representatives from the various Ministries involved, and local actors. It and its four thematic sub-groups were set up as a platform to exchange expertise and reach a consensus on the measures that need to be taken next. It will propose these measures to the inter-ministerial steering committee in charge of coordinating the implementation of France’s strategy. In Latvia, a call for proposals aimed at working closely with the Roma community was launched in October 2012. Financed by the State, the call, open to organisations representing Roma, aimed to encourage their participation in society and ensure cooperation between them and public authorities (local government and other stakeholders). Selected projects will include organising practical seminars to come up with local cooperation projects involving all stakeholders and developing a cooperation platform between employers and Roma.

Examples of underpinning the strategies with appropriate financing Bulgaria has set up an inter-ministerial working group dedicated to mobilising EU funds for Roma integration. The group is chaired by the Ministry of EU Funds Management and comprises deputy ministers, experts from the managing authorities and operational programmes and representatives of Roma NGOs. It aims to propose instruments and schemes and verify the measures planned under each operational programme. It will prepare an annex to the national strategy setting out activities and sustainable financing to implement them. This annex has not been adopted yet. In Hungary, based on an indicator system set up by national law, the most disadvantaged micro-regions were identified. These micro-regions suffer severe economic, employment and infrastructural problems. To develop them, targeted measures are used, consisting of social interventions, community and rural development measures and human resource services.

Examples of robust monitoring systems The Hungarian monitoring system will aim to measure the social impact of the national strategy and follow the state of play of its implementation. The system’s four basic components are: 1. A set of indicators measuring societal changes, aligned to the targets set in the national strategy; 2. A regular reporting system being set up in cooperation with an external international consultant to monitor whether the measures in the action plan have been implemented; 3. Research; 4. A social inclusion information system enabling the collection of data in various policy areas. Local authorities will also use it to develop equal opportunity plans. Estonia has recognised the need to further map the situation of Roma to determine the appropriate measures for Roma integration. The situation of Roma is therefore being assessed in a survey being carried out from 2012 to 2013. The aim is to use the findings to plan the next steps of the strategy.

Example of fighting discrimination Spain carried out various activities to train police forces. Training on equal treatment and ethnic discrimination was given to 158 regional, local and national security forces in 2012. In Germany, the Land of Schleswig-Holstein decided in 2012 to amend its constitution to recognise Roma and Sinti that are German nationals and live there as an ethnic minority. In Romania, special places in secondary schools, vocational training classes and in universities in the public education system are earmarked every year for Roma pupils and students. Thus far around 15,000 Roma pupils and students have benefited from this form of positive action.

[1]               COM(2011) 173 final, 5.4.2011.

[2]               European Council conclusions, EUCO 23/11 of 23 and 24
June 2011, following the Employment, Social Policy, Health and Consumer Affairs
(EPSCO) Council Conclusions on an EU Framework for National Roma Integration
Strategies up to 2020, 106665/11, 19.5.2011.

[3]               In this communication, the term ‘strategy’ covers
integrated sets of policy measures and strategies.

[4]               Communication National Roma integration
strategies: a first step in the implementation of the EU Framework and the
accompanying staff working document SWD (2012)133 final.

[5]               In four countries, full Roma integration in the
labour market could bring economic benefits of around € 0.5 billion and tax
benefits of around € 175 million annually. World Bank, Roma Inclusion: An
Economic Opportunity for Bulgaria, the Czech Republic, Romania and Serbia, September 2010.

[6]               Based on the Commission's proposal adopted on 29 May
2013 five Member States (Bulgaria, the Czech Republic, Hungary, Slovakia and Romania) receive Country Specific Recommendations relevant for Roma inclusion.
These recommendations on the one hand address the implementation of National
Roma Integration Strategies (ensuring effective delivery, including via better
coordination between stakeholders, allocation of funding, robust monitoring and
mainstreaming Roma inclusion goals in all policy fields), and on the other hand
specific policy developments in the field of education (especially the need to
ensure effective access to quality inclusive mainstream education starting with
pre-school) and employment (promoting activation measures, supporting
transition to the labour market).

[7]               BG, FR, HU, IT, RO, SK.

[8]               Within this network, a working group, reflecting the
diversity of situations and experiences concerning Roma in the EU, was set up
to discuss further the challenges and workable solutions. The issues identified
fed into a proposal for a legal instrument aiming to provide more support and
guidance to Member States on promoting Roma inclusion presented in parallel
with this Communication http://ec.europa.eu/justice/discrimination/files/roma_nationalcontactpoints_en.pdf

[9]               Ten Member States (BG, CZ, ES, FI, FR, IT, HU, RO, SK, UK) participate in this working group, which also includes experts from Eurofound
and the United Nations Development Programme.

[10]             Croatia has already begun preparing to join the process
of the EU Framework and is actively participating in the network of National
Contact Points and the FRA working group on monitoring.

[11]             Including conclusions highlighted during a dialogue
between Commissioners and civil society representatives on 15 May 2013, as well
as reports from civil society coalitions organised by the Decade of Roma
Inclusion Secretariat Foundation in six Member States (Bulgaria, Czech
Republic, Hungary, Romania, Slovakia, Spain) and two enlargement countries
(Albania, FYROM), reports from the network of independent experts on social
inclusion (http://ec.europa.eu/social/main.jsp?catId=1025&langId=en),
the report from the European Roma Information Office, Discrimination against
Roma in the EU in 2012, the written feedbacks from Eurocities and from
Eurodiaconia and research papers from the Academic network on Romani studies (http://romanistudies.eu/news/contributions_from_members/).

[12]             Some Member States made extra efforts to promote the
international networking of their local authorities, e.g. participating in the
European Alliance of Cities and Regions for Roma Inclusion. Others have
appointed regional or local coordinators to better identify problems in the
Roma communities or coordinate the implementation of the strategies at the
local level.

[13]             European Social Fund (ESF), European Regional
Development Fund (ERDF), Cohesion Fund (CF), European Agricultural Fund for
Rural Development (EAFRD) and European Maritime and Fisheries Fund (EMFF).

[14]             Communication Towards Social Investment for Growth
and Cohesion — including implementing the European Social Fund 2014-2020,
COM(2013) 83 final; and Commission Recommendation: ‘Investing in children:
breaking the cycle of disadvantage’ COM(2013) 778 final, 20.02.2013.

[15]             In line with the commitment made at European level to reduce
the number of people living in poverty by 20 million by 2020.

[16]             Some Member States have indicated having used surveys,
micro-censuses, territorial poverty mapping, etc.

[17]             The 10 Common Basic Principles
on Roma Inclusion were presented at the first Platform meeting on 24 April
2009. They were annexed to the Council conclusions of 8 June 2009. They
comprise: 1) constructive, pragmatic and non-discriminatory policies 2)
explicit but not exclusive targeting 3) inter-cultural approach 4) aiming for
the mainstream 5) awareness of the gender dimension 6) transfer of evidence-based
policies 7) use of EU instruments 8) involvement of regional and local
authorities 9) involvement of civil society 10) active participation of Roma.

[18]             In conformity with their
obligations under the Treaties, Member States are required to transpose in
their national legal order the provisions of Directive 2000/43/EC on the
principle of equal treatment between persons irrespective of racial or ethnic
origin and accordingly implement these transposing measures.

[19]             In particular in the Czech Republic, Hungary and Slovakia.

[20]             This includes: reports from the national experts on
social inclusion; European Roma Information Office, Discrimination against
Roma in the EU in 2012, 2013; Decade of Roma Inclusion Secretariat
Foundation in collaboration with Open Society Foundation`s Making the most of
EU Funds for Roma Programmes and Roma Initiatives Office, Interim Civil
Society Reports on the Implementation of National Roma Integration Strategies
and Decade Action Plans, 2013; Amnesty International report Roma: Demanding
Equality and Human Rights, April 2013; research papers from the Academic
network on Romani studies (http://romanistudies.eu/news/contributions_from_members/);
written contribution from members of Eurodiaconia.

[21]             For instance, Canada has expressed serious concerns
following the increase in the number of asylum applications lodged by the
nationals of certain Member States.

[22]             The Commission's remarks in Communication National
Roma Integration Strategies: a first step in the implementation of the EU
Framework, COM(226)2012 final, 26.5.2012 are still valid today: 'The
current situation of Roma living in poor conditions in enlargement countries
had consequences in terms of the increased number of Roma temporarily migrating
to EU Member States under visa-free regime and even applying for asylum. This
can have a negative impact on the visa liberalisation, which is one of the
greatest achievements towards the integration of the Western Balkans into the
EU."

[23]             Some of them (AT, BG, ES, FR, LV) organise training
sessions for their civil servants (e.g. teachers, the police and the judiciary)
to prevent discriminatory behaviour against Roma and counteract prejudice.

[24]             World Bank, Roma Inclusion: An Economic Opportunity
for Bulgaria, the Czech Republic, Romania and Serbia, September 2010.

[25]             http://ec.europa.eu/justice/discrimination/files/roma_nationalcontactpoints_en.pdf

[26]             Such initiatives include the National Contact Points on
Integration, the EU Strategy for the Danube Region, etc.

[27]             This designation is without prejudice to positions on
status, and is in line with UNSCR 1244 and the ICJ Opinion on the Kosovo
Declaration of Independence.

[28]             The Decade for Roma inclusion, which embraces all
enlargement countries except Iceland, Kosovo and Turkey, serves so far as a
platform and bridge for policy coordination, exchange of experience and
information sharing between participating EU Member States and the enlargement
countries, whilst promoting civil society participation on the national and
local level and complementarity with other international initiatives.

[29]             Communication National Roma Integration Strategies:
a first step in the implementation of the EU Framework, COM(226)2012 final,
26.5.2012 and accompanying Staff Working Document SWD(2012)133.

[30]             Commission staff working document, Elements for a Common Strategic Framework 2014 to 2020 for the
European Regional Development Fund, the European Social Fund, the Cohesion
Fund, the European Agricultural Fund for Rural Development and the European
Maritime and Fisheries Fund, of 14.3.2012, SWD(2012) 61 final, Part II.

[31]             Communication Towards Social Investment for Growth
and Cohesion — including implementing the European Social Fund 2014-2020,
COM(2013) 83 final; and Commission Recommendation: ‘Investing in children:
breaking the cycle of disadvantage’, COM(2013) 778 final, 20.2.2013.

[32]             Making social systems better and more sustainable, implementing
activating and enabling policies and supporting life-long social investment.

[33]             The Berlin strategy for Roma inclusion is available at http://www.parlament-berlin.de:8080/starweb/adis/citat/VT/17/DruckSachen/d17-0440.pdf.