alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
I 

114TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 3968 

To amend the Controlled Substances Act to allow the Attorney General 

to exempt a product from certain requirements if the Attorney General 

determines that it is not practical by processes known to be employed 

by clandestine laboratory operators to use the product in the illicit 

manufacture of methamphetamine. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

NOVEMBER 5, 2015 

Mr. GUINTA introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Energy and Commerce, and in addition to the Committee on 

the Judiciary, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, 

in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned 

A BILL 

To amend the Controlled Substances Act to allow the Attorney General to exempt a product from certain requirements if the Attorney General determines that it is not 

practical by processes known to be employed by clandestine laboratory operators to use the product in the illicit 

manufacture of methamphetamine. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 


smartinez on DSK4TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 3968 IH

1 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

2 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Stop Meth Labs and 

3 Enhance Patient Access Act of 2015’’. 

4 SEC. 2. EXEMPTION FOR PRODUCTS IF IT IS NOT PRAC5 TICAL BY PROCESSES KNOWN TO BE EM6 PLOYED BY CLANDESTINE LABORATORY OP7 ERATORS TO USE THE PRODUCTS IN THE IL8 LICIT MANUFACTURE OF METHAMPHET9 AMINE. 

10 Section 310(e)(3) of the Controlled Substances Act 

11 (21 U.S.C. 830(e)(3)) is amended by striking ‘‘if the At12 torney General determines that the product cannot be 

13 used in the illicit manufacture of methamphetamine’’ and 

14 inserting ‘‘if the Attorney General determines that it is 

15 not practical by processes known to be employed by clan16 destine laboratory operators to use the product in the il17 licit manufacture of methamphetamine’’. 

Æ 


smartinez on DSK4TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
Materials Not Included in

Airworthiness Directive (AD) Docket

Docket Number: FAA- 2011-1324

Directorate Identifier: 2011NM104AD

A300-52-6065 --- 7/9/02

A310-52-2067 --- 7/9/02

Name/Description of Item(s) Not Included in FDMS Docket and Maintained in the 

Supplemental AD Docket

MAY BE VIEWED AT: Federal Aviation Administration

Transport Airplane Directorate

Rules Docket

1601 Lind Ave. SW.,

Renton, WA 98057

425.227.1221

DURING THE HOURS OF: 9 a.m. and 3 p.m., Monday through Friday,

except Federal holidays.

Form Date: 03/05/2008
#### § 411.566 May an EN use outcome or milestone payments to make payments to the beneficiary?

Yes, an EN may use milestone or outcome payments to make payments to a beneficiary.

[73 FR 29350, May 20, 2008]
#### Enick Rakas, an Infant, by Harry Rakas, His Guardian ad Litem, Respondent, v. Philadelphia and Reading Coal and Iron Company, Appellant.

Judgment and order affirmed, with costs. No opinion. Present — Ingraham, P. J., McLaughlin, Laughlin, Scott and Hotchkiss, JJ.
#### § 404.409 What is full retirement age?

Full retirement age is the age at which you may receive unreduced old-age, wife's, husband's, widow's, or widower's benefits. Full retirement age has been 65 but is being gradually raised to age 67 beginning with people born after January 1, 1938. See § 404.102 regarding determination of age.

(a) *What is my full retirement age for old-age benefits or wife's or husband's benefits?* You may receive unreduced old-age, wife's, or husband's benefits beginning with the month you attain the age shown.

| If your birth date is: | Full retirement age is: |
| --- | --- |
| Before 1/2/1938 | 65 years. |
| 1/2/1938—1/1/1939 | 65 years and 2 months. |
| 1/2/1939—1/1/1940 | 65 years and 4 months. |
| 1/2/1940—1/1/1941 | 65 years and 6 months. |
| 1/2/1941—1/1/1942 | 65 years and 8 months. |
| 1/2/1942—1/1/1943 | 65 years and 10 months. |
| 1/2/1943—1/1/1955 | 66 years. |
| 1/2/1955—1/1/1956 | 66 years and 2 months. |
| 1/2/1956—1/1/1957 | 66 years and 4 months. |
| 1/2/1957—1/1/1958 | 66 years and 6 months. |
| 1/2/1958—1/1/1959 | 66 years and 8 months. |
| 1/2/1959—1/1/1960 | 66 years and 10 months. |
| 1/2/1960 and later | 67 years. |

(b) *What is my full retirement age for widow's or widower's benefits?* You may receive unreduced widow's or widower's benefits beginning with the month you attain the age shown.

| If your birth date is: | Full retirement age is: |
| --- | --- |
| Before 1/2/1912 | 62 years. |
| 1/2/1912—1/1/1940 | 65 years. |
| 1/2/1940—1/1/1941 | 65 years and 2 months. |
| 1/2/1941—1/1/1942 | 65 years and 4 months. |
| 1/2/1942—1/1/1943 | 65 years and 6 months. |
| 1/2/1943—1/1/1944 | 65 years and 8 months. |
| 1/2/1944—1/1/1945 | 65 years and 10 months. |
| 1/2/1945—1/1/1957 | 66 years. |
| 1/2/1957—1/1/1958 | 66 years and 2 months. |
| 1/2/1958—1/1/1959 | 66 years and 4 months. |
| 1/2/1959—1/1/1960 | 66 years and 6 months. |
| 1/2/1960—1/1/1961 | 66 years and 8 months. |
| 1/2/1961—1/1/1962 | 66 years and 10 months. |
| 1/2/1962 and later | 67 years. |

(c) *Can I still retire before full retirement age?* You may still elect early retirement. You may receive old-age, wife's or husband's benefits at age 62. You may receive widow's or widower's benefits at age 60. Those benefits will be reduced as explained in § 404.410.

[68 FR 4707, Jan. 30, 2003]
#### Frank J. Shaffer, as Administrator, etc., Respondent, v. Mary Fitzgerald and John Fitzgerald, Appellants.

Judgment affirmed, with costs. All concurred.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY HIGH

 96

 95

 95

 104

 97

 93

 96

 99

 106

 96

 99

 99

 99

 108

 105

 103

 109

 108

 113

 119

 108

 111

 108

 121

 108

 107

 119

 111

 104

 118

 121

 94

 94

 94

 94

 91

 92

 92

 96

 96

 93

 95

 96

 96

 98

 102

 64

 98

 100

 100

 103

 99

 99

 100

 103

 100

 99

 100

 100

 101

 101

 102

 95

 95

 95

 99

 93

 93

 95

 98

 101

 94

 97

 97

 98

 103

 103

 96

 102

 103

 105

 107

 104

 103

 104

 107

 105

 104

 106

 104

 102

 105

 106

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

DECEMBER 2013 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: February 21, 2014

HIGH LOW MEAN

 52.9

 53.1

 52.3

 50.2

 46.9

 45.3

 46.4

 45.5

 44.3

 43.9

 44.8

 45.5

 45.9

 47.0

 46.7

 47.4

 48.7

 50.4

 51.1

 49.3

 48.5

 48.1

 48.6

 48.9

 48.9

 48.4

 48.5

 48.0

 47.6

 47.5

 48.1

 50.7

 50.8

 50.5

 47.1

 44.8

 43.1

 44.7

 44.2

 43.2

 41.8

 42.7

 43.0

 43.6

 44.3

 44.3

 44.9

 45.8

 47.8

 49.1

 47.5

 46.5

 45.8

 46.1

 46.7

 46.6

 46.0

 46.0

 45.7

 45.5

 45.1

 45.6

 51.9

 51.9

 51.9

 48.8

 45.7

 44.4

 45.6

 44.9

 43.9

 43.0

 43.7

 44.2

 44.7

 45.6

 45.6

 46.1

 47.1

 48.9

 49.8

 48.4

 47.4

 46.9

 47.2

 47.9

 47.6

 47.2

 47.2

 46.8

 46.6

 46.5

 46.9

HIGH LOW MEAN

 10.9

 10.8

 10.6

 11.1

 11.8

 12.2

 11.8

 11.9

 12.3

 12.5

 12.4

 12.4

 12.3

 12.2

 12.3

 12.2

 12.2

 11.8

 11.5

 11.7

 11.9

 12.2

 12.2

 12.0

 12.1

 12.1

 12.1

 12.1

 12.1

 12.2

 12.1

 10.4

 10.4

 10.3

 10.4

 11.1

 11.6

 11.4

 11.3

 11.6

 12.0

 11.9

 11.8

 11.7

 11.7

 11.7

 11.6

 11.4

 11.1

 10.7

 10.8

 11.2

 11.4

 11.4

 11.3

 11.3

 11.4

 11.4

 11.4

 11.5

 11.3

 11.4

 10.6

 10.6

 10.4

 10.8

 11.5

 11.8

 11.6

 11.6

 11.9

 12.2

 12.1

 12.0

 11.9

 11.9

 11.9

 11.8

 11.7

 11.3

 11.0

 11.2

 11.5

 11.7

 11.7

 11.6

 11.6

 11.6

 11.7

 11.7

 11.7

 11.8

 11.7

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

RIPON ON THE STANISLAUS RIVER

 ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS WATER TEMPERATURE, DEG DISSOLVED OXYZEN, PPM
§ 355.8 Service of complaint. ( a ) Service of a complaint must be made by certified or registered mail or by delivery in any manner authorized by Rule 4(d) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure.
( b ) Proof of service, stating the name and address of the person on whom the complaint was served, and the manner and date of service, may be made by— ( 1 ) Affidavit of the individual making service;
( 2 ) An acknowledged U.S. Postal Service return receipt card; or
( 3 ) Written acknowledgment of the defendant or his representative.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Transportation

###### Surface Transportation Board

          - [Docket No. AB-1075X]

# AGENCY:

Surface Transportation Board, DOT.

# ACTION:

Correction to notice of exemption.
      ( print page 22167)    
On March 24, 2011, Manufacturers Railway Company (MRS) filed with the Surface Transportation Board a petition under 49 U.S.C. 10502 for exemption from the prior approval requirements of 49 U.S.C. 10903 to discontinue service over all tracks and yards located within the area bordered by Cedar Street on the north to Zepp Street on the south; and Mississippi River flood wall on the east to U.S. Interstate 55 on the west, in St. Louis, MO. 

                    On April 13, 2011, notice of the petition for exemption was served and published in the                     **Federal Register**                     (76 FR 20,819). The notice erroneously stated that the lines do not contain any Federally granted rights-of-way. This notice corrects that statement. According to MRS, the lines do contain Federally granted rights-of-way. All other information in the notice is correct.                

                    Board decisions and notices are available on our Web site at                     *http://www.stb.dot.gov.*

Decided: April 14, 2011.

By the Board, Rachel D. Campbell, Director, Office of Proceedings.

Jeffrey Herzig,

Clearance Clerk.

[FR Doc. 2011-9528 Filed 4-19-11; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4915-01-P
from what is expressed, implied or forecast in such statements. Any differences could be causedby a number of factors, including, but not limited to, risks and uncertainties with respect to theactions of actual or potential competitive suppliers of refined petroleum products in theCompany’s markets, the demand for and supply of crude oil and refined products, the spreadbetween market prices for refined products and market prices for crude oil, the possibility ofconstraints on the transportation of refined products, the possibility of inefficiencies,curtailments or shutdowns in refinery operations or pipelines, effects of governmental andenvironmental regulations and policies, the availability and cost of financing to the Company,the effectiveness of the Company’s capital investments and marketing strategies, the Company’sefficiency in carrying out construction projects, the ability of the Company to acquire refinedproduct operations or pipeline and terminal operations on acceptable terms and to integrate anyfuture acquired operations, the possibility of terrorist attacks and the consequences of any suchattacks, general economic conditions, risks and uncertainties with respect to our“merger of equals” with Frontier Oil Corporation, including our ability to complete the merger inthe anticipated timeframe, the diversion of management in connection with the mergerand our ability to realize fully or at all the anticipated benefits of the merger and otherfinancial,operational and legal risks and uncertainties detailed from time to time in the Company’sSecurities and Exchange Commission filings. The forward-looking statements speak only as ofthe date made and, other than as required by law, we undertake no obligation to publicly updateor revise any forward-looking statements, whether as a result of new information, future eventsor otherwise.**Contacts**Investors
**REGULATORY EVALUATION**

**Directorate Identifier:** 2012

- NM

- 1 38

- AD

**Executive Order 12866:** Could the AD be considered a “significant regulatory action”? YES ( ) explain NO (X) **DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedures:** Is the AD significant? YES ( ) explain NO (X) **Regulatory Flexibility Act:** Will the AD have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities? YES ( ) explain NO (X) **Intrastate Aviation in Alaska:** This AD could affect intrastate aviation in Alaska. I s it appropriate t o include specific requirements for aircraft operated in Alaska, where aviation might be the only mode of transportation? YES ( ) explain NO (X)
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY HIGH

 15,423

 14,660

 11,772

 9,329

 11,564

 12,500

 11,714

 12,397

 13,321

 14,597

 15,608

 14,580

 17,255

 17,448

 18,443

 17,231

 15,260

 13,944

 13,105

 12,802

 12,625

 12,636

 15,276

 15,425

 17,128

 17,705

 19,031

 19,812

 20,040

 19,033

 18,380

 4,910

 4,665

 3,428

 3,345

 4,477

 6,544

 6,123

 5,540

 3,998

 6,473

 6,546

 7,510

 7,336

 7,350

 6,171

 5,275

 6,694

 5,598

 5,713

 5,452

 6,221

 6,499

 7,360

 7,004

 6,877

 6,838

 6,928

 5,344

 7,795

 7,194

 6,939

 9,350

 9,140

 7,583

 6,588

 8,012

 8,883

 8,552

 8,932

 9,214

 9,907

 10,584

 11,376

 12,032

 12,756

 12,645

 12,211

 11,266

 10,195

 9,901

 8,932

 9,775

 9,843

 10,716

 10,682

 11,254

 11,462

 12,338

 12,800

 12,836

 12,763

 12,440

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

MAY 2021 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: June 1, 2021

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

PITTSBURG BOTTOM ON THE SACRAMENTO RIVER
##### Table of Contents



UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
 Washington, D.C. 20549
 FORM 8-K
 CURRENT REPORT
PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE
SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
 Date of Report (Date of earliest event reported): July 14, 2011
 SRA INTERNATIONAL, INC.
 (Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
 Delaware
    
    001-31334
    
    54-1360804(State or other jurisdiction 
of incorporation)
    
    (Commission
File Number)
    
    (IRS Employer
Identification No.)
 4300 Fair Lakes Court Fairfax, Virginia
    
    22033(Address of Principal Executive Offices)
    
    (Zip Code)
 (Registrants telephone number, including area code): (703) 803-1500
  o
 o
 o
 o




---



TABLE OF CONTENTS  Item 8.01 Other EventsSIGNATURES    Table of Contents  
 Item 8.01 Other Events
   The information in this Item 8.01 will be deemed filed for purposes of Section 18 of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and will be deemed to be incorporated by reference
into the Companys Schedule 14A, as amended, initially filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on April 18, 2011.
 Forward-Looking Statements




---



##### Table of Contents



Important Additional Information
  www.sec.gov Investor@sra.com




---



##### Table of Contents








---



##### Table of Contents



SIGNATURES
  SRA INTERNATIONAL, INC.Date:  July 14, 2011
    By:
    /s/ MARK D. SCHULTZMark D. SchultzSenior Vice President & General
Counsel
Electrical Conductivity, UMHOS

Day High Low Mean

1 0 0 0

2 0 0 0

3 0 0 0

4 0 0 0

5 0 0 0

6 0 0 0

7 0 0 0

8 0 0 0

9 0 0 0

10 0 0 0

11 0 0 0

12 0 0 0

13 0 0 0

14 0 0 0

15 0 0 0

16 0 0 0

17 0 0 0

18 0 0 0

19 0 0 0

20 0 0 0

21 0 0 0

22 0 0 0

23 0 0 0

24 0 0 0

25 0 0 0

26 0 0 0

27 0 0 0

28 0 0 0

29 0 0 0

30 0 0 0

COMMENT(S):

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

Historical Archive and Report Database

Pittsburg TopOn The Sacramento River

Period: June 2023 Run Date: 7/10/2023
§ 404.623 Am I required to file for all benefits if I am eligible for old-age and husband's or wife's benefits? ( a ) *Presumed filing for husband's or wife's benefits.* If you file an application for old-age benefits, you are presumed to have filed an application for husband's or wife's benefits in the first month of your entitlement to old-age benefits, if— ( 1 ) Your old-age benefits are reduced for age because you choose to receive them before you reach full retirement age (as defined in § 404.409); and
( 2 ) You are eligible for either a husband's or a wife's benefit for the first month of your entitlement to old-age benefits.
( b ) *Presumed filing for old-age benefits.* If you file an application for a husband's or a wife's benefit, you are presumed to have filed an application for old-age benefits in the first month of your entitlement to husband's or wife's benefits if— ( 1 ) Your husband's or wife's benefits are reduced for age because you choose to receive them before you reach full retirement age (as defined in § 404.409); and
( 2 ) You are eligible for old-age benefits for the first month of your entitlement to husband's or wife's benefits.
( c ) *Exception.* Paragraph (b) of this section does not apply if you are also entitled to disability benefits in the first month of your entitlement to husband's or wife's benefits. In this event, you are presumed to have filed for old-age benefits only if your disability benefits end before you reach full retirement age (as defined in § 404.409).
[68 FR 4712, Jan. 30, 2003]
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY HIGH

 105

 107

 110

 112

 120

 108

 112

 106

 107

 110

 109

 109

 110

 111

 112

 112

 112

 110

 109

 108

 107

 104

 106

 109

 111

 111

 112

 111

 111

 112

 114

 99

 99

 101

 106

 105

 104

 104

 102

 101

 104

 105

 105

 105

 106

 107

 108

 108

 106

 105

 104

 103

 102

 101

 102

 105

 108

 108

 108

 106

 106

 107

 101

 102

 105

 107

 107

 106

 106

 104

 104

 107

 107

 107

 107

 108

 109

 110

 110

 108

 106

 106

 105

 103

 104

 107

 109

 109

 110

 109

 108

 108

 110

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

AUGUST 2019 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: September 10, 2019

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

RIO VISTA ON THE SACRAMENTO RIVER
~ 

# StandardAero u.s. Department of Transportation Docket Operations West Building, Room W12-140 1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE Washington, D
.C. 20590-0001
January 9,2014 Re: Request Extension for Exemption No. 10845 to 14 CFR § 25.571(e)(1) Project ST08333CH-T, Installation of the Aircell Broadband Services (ABS) System with Ku Enhancements on Airbus A330 Series Aircraft In accordance with 14 CFR Part 11, StandardAero, petitioned for an exemption from 14 CFR 

### § 25.571 (e)(1) (Amendment 25-96) as it relates to the above referenced certification project. StandardAero requests an extension to the previously granted exemption from this rule and that it remain valid for a period of one year from the date of STC issuance. This request is identical to our original Petition for Exemption which was granted. However, when the exemption was issued, the exemption was issued for one year from the date of issuance which has not allowed StandardAero with sufficient time to fully complete all required substantiation activity. Safety and Public Interest The previous considerations and determination regarding safety and public interest have not changed between the original petition and this extension request. In light of the above considerations StandardAero submits that good cause exists not to delay action on this request. Summary of Exemption Request In accordance with 14 CFR 

### § 11.81 (f), StandardAero offers the following summary suitable for publication in the Federal Register in the event the FAA believes that good cause to waive publication has not been established
. StandardAero, requests the FAA grant an extension to the current exemption from the discrete source damage tolerance (i.e
. , bird strike) requirements of 14 CFR 

### § 25.571(e)(1) for a period of one year based on data that such a bird strike encounter is less than extremely improbable
. Please feel free to contact me if you need further information. Respectfully,

,/: I \ - 

# n 

# nC \~VJ~~ Tim Winiesdorffer ODA administrator StandardAero 1200 North Airport Drive Springfield, IL 62707 United States Mobile: 614.402.4455 Tim
.Winiesdorffer@standardaero
.com www.standardaero
.com
Exhibit 99.1

                              Annual Certification

      Re:   Morgan Stanley ABS Capital I Inc. Trust (the "Trust"), Mortgage
            Pass-Through Certificates, Series 2005-NC2, issued pursuant to the
            Pooling and Servicing Agreement, dated as April 1, 2005 (the
            "Pooling and Servicing Agreement"), by and among Morgan Stanley ABS
            Capital I Inc, as depositor (the "Depositor"), Deutsche Bank
            National Trust Company, as trustee (the "Trustee"), NC Capital
            Corporation, as responsible party (the Responsible Party"), and
            HomEq Servicing Corporation, as servicer (the"Servicer")

I, Arthur Q. Lyon, certify to the Depositor, the Trustee and their officers,
directors and affiliates, and with the knowledge and intent that they will rely
upon this certification, that:

      A review of the activities of the Servicer during the 2005 calendar year
      and the Servicer's performance under the Pooling and Servicing Agreement
      has been made under my supervision, the Servicer has complied with the
      Pooling and Servicing Agreement in all material respects and, to the best
      of my knowledge, based on such review, the Servicer has materially
      fulfilled all of its obligations under the Pooling and Servicing Agreement
      throughout such calendar year.



Date: March 15, 2006

HomeEq Servicing Corporation

/s/ Arthur Q. Lyon
----------------------------
Arthur Q. Lyon
President