alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
I 

114TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 4150 

To amend title 38, United States Code, to allow the Secretary of Veterans 

Affairs to modify the hours of employment of physicians and physician 

assistants employed on a full-time basis by the Department of Veterans 

Affairs. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

DECEMBER 1, 2015 

Mr. RUIZ (for himself and Mr. WENSTRUP) introduced the following bill; 

which was referred to the Committee on Veterans’ Affairs 

A BILL 

To amend title 38, United States Code, to allow the Secretary of Veterans Affairs to modify the hours of employment of physicians and physician assistants employed 

on a full-time basis by the Department of Veterans Affairs. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Department of Vet5 erans Affairs Emergency Medical Staffing Recruitment 

6 and Retention Act’’. 


smartinez on DSK4TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 4150 IH

1 SEC. 2. MODIFICATION OF HOURS OF EMPLOYMENT FOR 

2 PHYSICIANS AND PHYSICIAN ASSISTANTS EM3 PLOYED BY THE DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS 

4 AFFAIRS. 

5 Section 7423(a) of title 38, United States Code, is 

6 amended— 

7 (1) by striking ‘‘(a) The hours’’ and inserting 

8 ‘‘(a)(1) Except as provided in paragraph (2), the 

9 hours’’; and 

10 (2) by adding at the end the following new 

11 paragraph: 

12 ‘‘(2) The Secretary may modify the hours of employ13 ment for a physician or physician assistant appointed in 

14 the Administration under any provision of this chapter on 

15 a full-time basis to be more than or less than 80 hours 

16 in a biweekly pay period if the total hours of employment 

17 for such employee in a calendar year does not exceed 

18 2,080 hours.’’. 

Æ 


smartinez on DSK4TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
# C_2012292EN.01001102.xml

| 28.9.2012 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 292/11 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

28.9.2012

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 292/11

---

Information communicated by Member States regarding closure of fisheries

2012/C 292/11

In accordance with Article 35(3) of Council Regulation (EC) No 1224/2009 of 20 November 2009 establishing a Community control system for ensuring compliance with the rules of the common fisheries policy (1), a decision has been taken to close the fishery as set down in the following table:

1

| Date and time of closure | 21.8.2012 |
| --- | --- |
| Duration | 21.8.2012-31.12.2012 |
| Member State | Portugal |
| Stock or group of stocks | POK/1N2AB. |
| Species | Saithe (Pollachius virens) |
| Zone | Norwegian waters of I and II |
| Type(s) of fishing vessels | — |
| Reference number | FS42TQ44 |

Date and time of closure

21.8.2012

Duration

21.8.2012-31.12.2012

Member State

Portugal

Stock or group of stocks

POK/1N2AB.

Species

Saithe (Pollachius virens)

Pollachius virens

Zone

Norwegian waters of I and II

Type(s) of fishing vessels

—

Reference number

FS42TQ44

---

(1)  OJ L 343, 22.12.2009, p. 1.

1

---
Exhibit 21.1



SUBSIDIARIES OF REGISTRANT



|                                       |  |                        
|-------------------------------------- |  | -----------------------
|NAME OF SUBSIDIARY                     |  | COUNTRY OF ORGANIZATION
|Lazard International Holdings, Inc.    |  | U.S.                   
|Lazard Frères & Co. LLC                |  | U.S.                   
|Lazard Asset Management LLC            |  | U.S.                   
|Lazard Funding Limited LLC             |  | U.S.                   
|Lazard & Co., Holdings Limited         |  | United Kingdom         
|Lazard & Co., Limited                  |  | United Kingdom         
|Compagnie Financière Lazard Frères SAS |  | France                 
|Lazard Frères Gestion SAS              |  | France                 
|Lazard Frères Banque SA                |  | France                 
|Maison Lazard SAS                      |  | France
Exhibit 32.1  CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002  In connection with the Quarterly Report of ALCO, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2010 (the "Report"), I, Andrew Liu, Chief Executive Officer and Chairman of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:  1) The Report fully complies with the requirement of Section 13(a) or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and  2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the Company's financial position and results of operations.      By: /s/ Andrew Liu, CEO and Chairman  Date:May 13, 2010
I 

114TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 4052 

To amend the Public Health Service Act to prioritize the treatment of veterans with traumatic brain injuries through the National Health Service 

Corps, and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

NOVEMBER 17, 2015 

Ms. MAXINE WATERS of California (for herself, Mrs. WATSON COLEMAN, Mr. 

FATTAH, Mr. DAVID SCOTT of Georgia, Mr. SCOTT of Virginia, Ms. 

JACKSON LEE, Mr. AL GREEN of Texas, Mr. BUTTERFIELD, Mr. RANGEL, Mr. MEEKS, Mr. HONDA, Mr. JEFFRIES, and Mr. HASTINGS) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Energy 

and Commerce 

A BILL 

To amend the Public Health Service Act to prioritize the 

treatment of veterans with traumatic brain injuries 

through the National Health Service Corps, and for other 

purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 


smartinez on DSK4TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 4052 IH

1 SECTION 1. PRIORITIZING TREATMENT OF TRAUMATIC 

2 BRAIN INJURIES AND PTSD BY NATIONAL 

3 HEALTH SERVICE CORPS. 

4 (a) PRIORITY IN ASSIGNING CORPS PERSONNEL.— 

5 Section 333A(a)(1) of the Public Health Service Act (42 

6 U.S.C. 254f–1(a)(1)) is amended by striking ‘‘(1) give pri7 ority to’’ and all that follows through the end of subpara8 graph (A) and inserting the following: 

9 ‘‘(1) give priority to any such application 

10 that— 

11 ‘‘(A) is made regarding the provision of 

12 primary health services to a health professional 

13 shortage area— 

14 ‘‘(i) with the greatest such shortage; 

15 or 

16 ‘‘(ii) serving a high number of vet17 erans (as defined in section 101(2) of title 

18 38, United States Code) with mental and 

19 behavioral issues and other ailments result20 ing from traumatic brain injuries; and’’. 

21 (b) PRIORITY FOR RECEIVING LOAN REPAYMENT

22 CONTRACTS.—Section 338B(d)(2) of the Public Health 

23 Service Act (42 U.S.C. 254l–1(d)(2)) is amended— 

24 (1) in subparagraph (B), by striking ‘‘and’’ at 

25 the end; 


smartinez on DSK4TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
3 

•HR 4052 IH

1 (2) in subparagraph (C), by striking the period 

2 at the end and inserting ‘‘; and’’; and 

3 (3) by adding at the end the following: 

4 ‘‘(D) to any application for such a contract 

5 submitted by an individual who has received, or 

6 is receiving, training with respect to assessment 

7 of risk for, early intervention for, and diagnosis, 

8 management, and treatment of, posttraumatic 

9 stress disorder (including in connection with 

10 traumatic brain injuries) pursuant to clinical 

11 practice guidelines of the Department of Vet12 erans Affairs and the Department of Defense.’’. 

Æ 


smartinez on DSK4TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Reginald K. TOWNSEND, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 03-3031.

United States Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit.

Argued April 1, 2005.

Decided Feb. 21, 2006.

Ruth Hennage, Office of the United States Attorney, South Bend, IN, for Plaintif-Appellee.

Donald J. Berger, Berger & Gammage, South Bend, IN, for Defendant-Appellant.

Before Hon. FRANK H. EASTERBROOK, Hon. DANIEL A. MANION, and Hon. ILANA DIAMOND ROVNER, Circuit Judges.

*ORDER*

This case is on appeal from a limited remand from our court pursuant to *United States v. Paladino,*401 F.3d 471, 483-84 (7th Cir.2005). The district court has now determined that it would impose the same sentence if we were to vacate the judgment and remand for re-sentencing even in light of the advisory nature of the Guidelines. We must therefore determine whether the sentence is reasonable. If it is, then any Sixth Amendment violation in the sentencing process did not affect his substantial rights and thus did not constitute plain error.

The parties have had the opportunity to file arguments concerning the appropriate disposition of the appeal in light of the district court’s decision, but only the government has availed itself of that opportunity. Townsend’s sentence is within the Guideline range, and therefore we must presume that the sentence of 300 months on count lfor aggravated bank robbery, followed by 84 months on count 2 for brandishing a firearm during a crime of violence, is reasonable. *United States v. Mykytiuk,*415 F.3d 606, 608 (7th Cir. 2005). A defendant may rebut that presumption by demonstrating that his sentence is unreasonable in light of the factors identified in 18 U.S.C. § 3553(a).

The district court’s order reveals that the court considered the 18 U.S.C. § 3553(a) factors, and that it properly applied those factors in determining that it would give the same sentence. There are *738no apparent errors in the court’s consideration of those factors, nor does Townsend raise any argument to this court that the sentence is unreasonable. Accordingly, we affirm Townsend’s sentence.
(No. 6851

#### Jo Ann K. Meade, Claimant, *vs.*State of Illinois, Department of Mental Health, Respondent.

*Opinion filed November 21, 1972.*

Jo Ann K. Meade, Claimant, pro se.

William J. Scott, Attorney General; Saul R. Wexler, Assistant Attorney General, for Respondent.

Per Curiam.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                                       <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                            6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                                  DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                                       JUN-30-1998
<CASH>                                                   1,159
<SECURITIES>                                                 0
<RECEIVABLES>                                               43
<ALLOWANCES>                                                17
<INVENTORY>                                                  0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                             0
<PP&E>                                                   1,743
<DEPRECIATION>                                           1,030
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                           3,035
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                        0
<BONDS>                                                      0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                        0
<PREFERRED>                                                  0
<COMMON>                                                     0
<OTHER-SE>                                               1,730
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                             3,035
<SALES>                                                      0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                           546
<CGS>                                                        0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                              490
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                             0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                             3
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                           0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                             56
<INCOME-TAX>                                              (22)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                         78
<DISCONTINUED>                                               0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                              0
<CHANGES>                                                    0
<NET-INCOME>                                                78
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                              .19
<EPS-DILUTED>                                                0
        

</TABLE>
Exhibit 32.1

Certification Pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. § 1350)

I, Randolph Gress,
certify that:

1. the accompanying Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2008 (the Report), fully
complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

2.
the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Innophos, Inc. at the dates and for the periods indicated.

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided Innophos, Inc. and will be retained by Innophos, Inc. and
furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

The undersigned expressly disclaims any obligation to
update the foregoing certification except as required by law.

Date: March 12, 2009



/S/ RANDOLPH GRESSRandolph Gress Chief Executive Officer and Director (Principal Executive Officer)


The foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to the requirements of 18
U.S.C. § 1350 and is not being filed as a part of the Report or as a separate disclosure document.



93
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY HIGH

 66

 64

 64

 65

 67

 64

 64

 65

 65

 65

 65

 67

 64

 65

 66

 66

 62

 61

 62

 62

 69

 64

 63

 66

 63

 62

 64

 65

 66

 63

 67

 57

 57

 58

 58

 57

 56

 57

 57

 57

 58

 58

 59

 58

 57

 57

 57

 57

 57

 56

 56

 57

 58

 58

 58

 58

 57

 57

 57

 58

 58

 59

 58

 59

 59

 59

 61

 58

 60

 59

 59

 60

 60

 61

 60

 59

 60

 59

 58

 58

 58

 57

 62

 60

 59

 60

 59

 59

 59

 59

 60

 60

 63

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

OCTOBER 2006 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: November 3, 2006

HIGH LOW MEAN

 58.3

 58.6

 58.5

 58.5

 58.1

 58.1

 58.5

 58.4

 58.6

 58.1

 57.8

 57.9

 57.4

 56.9

 56.7

 56.6

 56.3

 55.9

 57.0

 57.3

 57.1

 56.7

 56.9

 56.4

 55.8

 54.9

 55.1

 55.3

 55.1

 54.8

 54.7

 56.8

 56.7

 57.5

 57.0

 57.3

 56.4

 56.7

 56.8

 57.0

 56.8

 56.4

 56.4

 56.2

 55.5

 55.5

 55.8

 55.2

 54.5

 55.4

 56.3

 55.7

 55.6

 55.4

 55.1

 54.9

 53.6

 53.8

 54.0

 53.9

 53.8

 53.4

 57.5

 57.6

 57.9

 57.7

 57.7

 57.2

 57.6

 57.6

 57.7

 57.6

 57.2

 57.3

 56.8

 56.3

 56.1

 56.2

 55.8

 55.3

 56.4

 56.8

 56.5

 56.2

 56.2

 55.8

 55.4

 54.3

 54.4

 54.5

 54.4

 54.3

 54.1

HIGH LOW MEAN

 9.5

 9.4

 9.3

 9.4

 10.4

 10.4

 10.4

 10.2

 10.2

 10.1

 9.7

 9.7

 9.7

 9.9

 10.0

 9.9

 10.0

 10.1

 9.9

 9.6

 9.6

 9.7

 9.8

 9.8

 9.9

 10.1

 10.2

 10.2

 10.1

 10.1

 10.3

 9.1

 9.0

 9.1

 9.2

 9.0

 10.2

 10.1

 10.0

 9.9

 8.7

 9.4

 9.3

 9.4

 9.6

 9.6

 9.6

 9.7

 9.8

 9.6

 9.5

 9.4

 9.4

 9.5

 9.5

 9.6

 9.8

 9.9

 9.8

 9.8

 9.9

 9.8

 9.3

 9.2

 9.2

 9.3

 9.8

 10.3

 10.3

 10.1

 10.0

 9.8

 9.6

 9.5

 9.6

 9.8

 9.8

 9.8

 9.8

 9.9

 9.8

 9.6

 9.5

 9.6

 9.6

 9.6

 9.7

 10.0

 10.1

 10.0

 10.0

 10.0

 10.0

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

RIPON ON THE STANISLAUS RIVER

 ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS WATER TEMPERATURE, DEG DISSOLVED OXYZEN, PPM
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

DAY HIGH

 1,641

 2,054

 1,982

 1,962

 1,736

 1,742

 2,052

 2,185

 2,575

 2,962

 2,385

 2,484

 2,537

 3,029

 2,658

 2,353

 2,002

 1,987

 2,433

 3,304

 3,600

 3,357

 3,715

 3,025

 2,620

 2,786

 2,764

 3,353

 3,118

 2,750

 207

 215

 220

 221

 219

 212

 219

 221

 227

 228

 237

 252

 253

 266

 267

 243

 217

 228

 213

 223

 232

 239

 244

 231

 239

 251

 257

 259

 271

 274

 498

 547

 490

 480

 442

 450

 525

 634

 764

 882

 823

 860

 826

 1,106

 895

 672

 549

 567

 601

 741

 889

 1,200

 953

 830

 875

 919

 943

 1,060

 1,065

 855

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

SEPTEMBER 2015 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: October 5, 2015

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

RIO VISTA ON THE SACRAMENTO RIVER
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

DAY HIGH

 198

 203

 198

 201

 195

 196

 189

 189

 190

 192

 191

 200

 196

 185

 183

 170

 170

 172

 181

 180

 190

 192

 199

 203

 218

 236

 228

 226

 215

 207

 157

 140

 148

 154

 151

 162

 150

 147

 160

 157

 151

 153

 155

 156

 150

 142

 142

 130

 136

 144

 153

 151

 158

 160

 146

 147

 150

 137

 129

 120

 179

 178

 175

 175

 173

 176

 172

 170

 176

 179

 176

 176

 178

 171

 169

 159

 159

 157

 161

 168

 175

 180

 187

 192

 196

 200

 196

 194

 187

 175

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

APRIL 2003 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: May 8, 2003

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

SAN ANDREAS ON THE SAN JOAQUIN RIVER
Exhibit 32(b)



Certification Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002



In connection with the filing of this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the Quarter Ended September 30, 2003 (the Report) by
CompuCom Systems, Inc. (Registrant), the undersigned hereby certifies that:



| | 1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and
| | -- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Registrant.
| | -- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



/s/ M. Lazane SmithM. Lazane Smith,Senior Vice President, Finance, ChiefFinancial Officer, Secretary and Director




A signed original of this
written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Registrant and will be retained by the Registrant and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
#### § 30.602 Who is responsible for paying the representative's fee?

A representative may charge the claimant a fee for services and for costs associated with the representation before OWCP. The claimant is solely responsible for paying the fee and other costs. OWCP will not reimburse the claimant, nor is it in any way liable for the amount of the fee and costs.
No. 11,899.

#### Latzer *v.*Tedford.

Decided September 12, 1927.

Action to rescind purchase of interest in business. Judgment for plaintiff.

*Affirmed.*

*On Application for Supersedeas.*

1. Appeal and *Error*— Deficient *Record.*Where the court’s reasons for denying a motion to discharge a receiver do not appear, it will not be assumed on review that they were not good.

2. *Receivers*— Involuntary *Servitude.*The contention that to compel a party to continue as receiver after he has asked for his discharge is to impose upon him involuntary servitude, not considered.

*Error to the District Court of the City and County, of Denver, Hon. George F. Dunklee, Judge.*

Mr. Nathan I. Golden, Mr. David W. Oyler, for plaintiff in error.

Mr. C. H. Scribner, Mr. Lowell White, for defendant in error.

*En Banc.*

*281Mr. Justice Denison

delivered the opinion of the court.

Tedpord had judgment to rescind his purchase of a half interest in Latzer’s business on the ground of fraud. Latzer brings error and moves for supersedeas.

The fraud consisted in false representations by Latzer, when he sold to Tedford, that he was making $100 per week, winter and summer. It is claimed that the evidence does not support the finding, but, if the court believed Tedford’s evidence, no other finding was possible.

Latzer was appointed receiver. He complains that the court denied his motion for discharge, but the court’s reasons do not appear and we cannot assume that they were not good. His counsel assert that to compel him to continue as receiver is to impose involuntary servitude, but we hardly think they expect serious consideration of that ])oint.

Supersedeas denied and judgment affirmed.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY HIGH

 95

 95

 95

 96

 107

 95

 95

 96

 95

 96

 95

 96

 95

 105

 116

 95

 97

 97

 99

 99

 104

 122

 99

 103

 120

 122

 123

 112

 111

 109

 111

 90

 90

 90

 90

 90

 90

 90

 91

 91

 91

 90

 90

 90

 90

 92

 89

 92

 91

 92

 91

 91

 92

 93

 97

 91

 100

 108

 105

 102

 102

 104

 92

 91

 93

 91

 92

 92

 92

 93

 92

 93

 91

 93

 91

 92

 103

 91

 94

 93

 95

 93

 95

 103

 96

 99

 104

 105

 114

 107

 105

 104

 106

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

DECEMBER 2008 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: January 6, 2009

HIGH LOW MEAN

 53.4

 54.8

 55.2

 55.3

 53.4

 52.1

 51.5

 50.6

 50.6

 50.3

 50.1

 50.3

 51.0

 49.6

 50.0

 48.6

 48.2

 47.1

 49.0

 48.1

 48.8

 49.7

 50.2

 51.6

 51.6

 49.4

 48.7

 48.7

 49.5

 49.3

 49.2

 52.7

 53.3

 54.5

 53.7

 52.0

 51.5

 50.6

 49.6

 48.7

 48.3

 48.7

 48.4

 49.5

 47.9

 48.3

 47.6

 46.6

 44.8

 47.1

 46.6

 47.0

 47.7

 48.6

 49.7

 49.9

 47.5

 46.6

 46.5

 47.2

 48.4

 48.8

 53.2

 54.0

 54.8

 54.7

 52.6

 51.9

 51.0

 50.3

 49.6

 49.3

 49.3

 49.4

 50.2

 48.8

 49.2

 48.2

 47.5

 46.2

 47.8

 47.4

 47.7

 48.9

 49.5

 50.3

 50.9

 48.4

 47.6

 47.7

 48.3

 48.8

 49.0

HIGH LOW MEAN

 10.4

 10.4

 10.2

 10.2

 10.6

 10.6

 10.7

 10.7

 11.1

 11.3

 11.3

 11.2

 11.0

 11.3

 11.0

 11.2

 11.4

 11.7

 11.5

 11.7

 11.4

 11.1

 11.1

 10.7

 10.6

 11.2

 11.4

 11.6

 11.5

 11.2

 11.1

 10.0

 9.9

 9.8

 9.8

 10.0

 10.2

 10.3

 10.4

 10.5

 10.8

 10.8

 10.7

 10.6

 10.6

 10.6

 10.7

 10.8

 11.0

 11.1

 11.1

 10.9

 10.7

 10.5

 10.3

 10.2

 10.5

 10.7

 10.9

 10.9

 10.8

 10.7

 10.2

 10.1

 10.0

 10.0

 10.3

 10.4

 10.5

 10.5

 10.8

 11.0

 11.0

 10.9

 10.7

 10.9

 10.8

 10.9

 11.1

 11.3

 11.3

 11.3

 11.2

 10.9

 10.7

 10.5

 10.4

 10.7

 11.0

 11.2

 11.1

 10.9

 10.8

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

RIPON ON THE STANISLAUS RIVER

 ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS WATER TEMPERATURE, DEG DISSOLVED OXYZEN, PPM
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

JUDGMENT RENDERED OCTOBER 11, 2016

NO. 03-16-00579-CR

Chad Alan Cappiello a/k/a Chad Russell, Appellant

v.

The State of Texas, Appellee

APPEAL FROM THE 264TH DISTRICT COURT OF BELL COUNTY

BEFORE JUSTICES PURYEAR, PEMBERTON, AND FIELD

DISMISSED FOR WANT OF JURISDICTION-- OPINION BY JUSTICE FIELD

This is an appeal from the judgment of conviction rendered by the trial court. Having reviewed 

the record, it appears that the Court lacks jurisdiction over this appeal. Therefore, the Court 

dismisses the appeal for want of jurisdiction. Appellant shall pay all costs relating to this appeal, 

both in this Court and the court below.