alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### § 404.1928 Effect of the alien non-payment provision.

An agreement may provide that a person entitled to benefits under title II of the Social Security Act may receive those benefits while residing in the foreign country party to the agreement, regardless of the alien non-payment provision (see § 404.460).
Electrical Conductivity, UMHOS WATER TEMPERATURE, DEG DISSOLVED OXYZEN, PPM

Day High Low Mean High Low Mean High Low Mean

1 74 72 72 58.4 55.7 57.1 10.9 10.5 10.7

2 73 70 72 58.6 56.0 57.3 10.8 10.6 10.7

3 74 70 72 59.1 56.0 57.6 10.9 10.5 10.7

4 73 72 73 59.7 57.1 58.3 10.7 10.3 10.5

5 72 71 71 59.7 57.2 58.5 10.6 10.2 10.5

6 72 70 71 58.5 56.9 57.7 10.6 10.3 10.5

7 72 70 71 57.2 55.6 56.5 10.8 10.5 10.7

8 71 70 71 58.2 55.9 57.0 10.8 10.5 10.7

9 71 70 70 59.2 56.7 58.0 10.8 10.4 10.6

10 74 70 72 57.9 56.4 57.2 10.8 10.5 10.6

11 72 69 70 57.5 55.2 56.5 10.7 10.5 10.6

12 70 68 69 57.9 56.1 57.0 10.7 10.5 10.6

13 68 65 67 59.2 56.4 57.8 10.8 10.5 10.6

14 0 0 0 79.3 57.1 66.2 10.7 8.1 9.6

15 0 0 0 85.7 71.1 78.3 8.9 7.6 8.2

16 0 0 0 86.7 71.7 79.4 8.6 7.5 8.0

17 0 0 0 88.1 72.7 80.6 8.4 7.3 7.8

18 0 0 0 84.8 73.9 79.5 8.3 7.5 7.9

19 0 0 0 79.2 67.5 73.7 8.9 7.9 8.3

20 0 0 0 71.9 56.4 61.5 10.7 8.4 9.9

21 72 70 71 58.5 55.5 57.0 10.8 10.6 10.7

22 72 70 70 58.5 56.1 57.2 10.8 10.5 10.7

23 72 69 70 58.7 55.9 57.3 10.9 10.6 10.8

24 71 69 70 58.9 56.1 57.6 10.9 10.6 10.8

25 71 70 70 59.3 56.7 57.9 10.9 10.6 10.8

26 71 70 70 59.3 56.6 58.0 10.9 10.6 10.7

27 72 70 71 59.6 56.8 58.1 10.9 10.5 10.7

28 73 70 71 60.4 56.8 58.6 10.8 10.2 10.6

29 73 70 71 60.4 57.9 59.3 10.5 10.3 10.5

30 72 69 70 60.6 57.8 59.2 10.7 10.4 10.5

COMMENT(S):

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

Historical Archive and Report Database

Ripon on the Stanislaus River Water Quality

Period: June 2023 Run Date: 7/10/2023
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

DAY ELEVATION

 238.87

 238.64

 238.60

 238.62

 238.95

 238.63

 238.59

 239.14

 239.54

 239.28

 238.85

 238.70

 238.60

 238.58

 238.57

 238.50

 238.44

 238.39

 239.35

 238.33

 238.30

 238.29

 238.30

 238.40

 238.56

 238.56

 238.58

 238.52

 238.57

 238.53

 337

 313

 309

 311

 345

 312

 308

 367

 415

 384

 335

 319

 309

 307

 306

 299

 293

 288

 392

 282

 279

 278

 279

 289

 305

 305

 307

 301

 306

 302

STORAGE

-19

-24

-4

+2

+34

-33

-4

+59

+48

-31

-49

-16

-10

-2

-1

-7

-6

-5

+104

-110

-3

-1

+1

+10

+16

+0

+2

-6

+5

-4

CHANGE

 62

 167

 164

 57

 59

 115

 167

 175

 177

 117

 152

 83

 113

 92

 152

 154

 169

 240

 197

 234

 274

 320

 365

 376

 237

 355

 359

 353

 395

 316

 7,960

 8,640

 7,920

 7,880

 7,970

 7,400

 7,270

 8,790

 10,900

 8,760

 7,970

 7,510

 7,230

 7,070

 6,800

 6,700

 6,590

 6,470

 6,370

 6,260

 6,070

 5,930

 6,050

 6,430

 7,040

 7,140

 7,250

 7,090

 7,330

 7,400

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

APRIL 2005 RED BLUFF DIVERSION RESERVOIR DAILY OPERATIONS RUN DATE: October 26, 2005

IN LAKE

CANAL

 ACRE-FEET

TOTALS -54 6,196 220,190

ACRE-FEET -54 12,290 436,747

SUMMARY

RELEASE (ACRE-FEET)

TOTAL 449,688

 356

RELEASE

RIVER

CORNING TO SACTO

CANAL

RELEASE C.F.S.

TEHAMA

COLUSA

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 18

 19

 20

 15

 0

 0

 0

 0

 32

 118

 27

 17

 4

 0

 16

 6

 10

 26

 328

 651

CORNING CANAL 651

TEHAMA-COLUSA CANAL 12,290

TO SACTO RIVER 436,747

Table 9
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND
EXCHANGE COMMISSIONWashington, D.C. 20549 FORM 8-K CURRENT REPORT
Pursuant to
Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 Date of Report (Date of earliest
event reported): July 18, 2011 DCB FINANCIAL CORP(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter) Ohio
  
  0-22387
  
  31-1469837(State or other Jurisdiction of Incorporation)
  
  (Commission File Number)
  
  (IRS Employer Identification No.) 110 Riverbend Avenue, Lewis
Center, Ohio
  
  43035(Address of Principal Executive Offices)
  
  (Zip Code) Registrant’s telephone number,
including area code: (740) 657-7000 (Former name or former address if changed since last report.) Check the appropriate box below if the
Form 8-K filing is intended to simultaneously satisfy the filing obligation of
the registrant under any of the following provisions: o Written
communications pursuant to Rule 425 under the Securities Act (17 CFR
230.425)o Soliciting material pursuant
to Rule 14a-12 under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.14a-12)o Pre-commencement communications pursuant to Rule
14d-2(b) under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.14d-2(b))o Pre-commencement communications pursuant to Rule
13e-4(c) under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.13e-4(c))
  1




---



##### 



Item 8.01 Other Events. On July 14, 2011, Registrant
issued a press release announcing initiatives related to expense reductions
including a reduction in force and branch office closure. Item 9.01 Financial
Statements and Exhibits.  (c)
  
  Exhibits The following exhibits are furnished
herewith: ExhibitNumber
  
  Exhibit
Description99
  
  Press Release dated July 14, 2011
 SIGNATURES Pursuant to the requirements of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to
be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized. DCB FINANCIAL CORP Date: July 18, 2011 By: /s/
John A.
Ustaszewski
John
A. Ustaszewski
Senior Vice-President and Chief Financial Officer  2
#### NELMS v. UNITED STATES.

No. 11982.

United States Court of Appeals, District of Columbia Circuit.

Argued May 28, 1954.

Decided July 8, 1954.

Petition for Rehearing Denied Sept. 23, 1954.

Wilbur K. Miller, Circuit Judge, dissented in part.

*679Mr. Perry S. Patterson, Washington, D. C., appointed by this Court, with whom Mr. Herbert J. Miller, Jr., Washington, D. C., was on the brief, for appellant.

Mr. Samuel J. L’Hommedieu, Jr., Asst. U. S. Atty., with whom Messrs. Leo A. Rover, U. S. Atty., and Lewis A. Carroll and Thomas A. Flannery, Asst. U. S. Attys., were on the brief, for appellee.

Before WILBUR K. MILLER, FAHY and DANAHER, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

In count one of an indictment appellant was charged with housebreaking in violation of § 22-1801, D.C.Code (1951), and in count two with larceny in violation of §§ 22-2201, 22-2202, D.C.Code (1951). In a jury trial he was convicted as charged on the first count and of petit larceny on the second. The sentence imposed was a general one of imprisonment for a period of three to nine years.

We find no reversible error affecting the conviction for housebreaking. Since the sentence imposed is within that permitted for that offense, § 22-1801, supra, we could affirm the judgment without considering the larceny count. Claassen v. United States, 142 U.S. 140, 12 S.Ct. 169, 35 L.Ed. 966; Whitfield v. State of Ohio, 297 U.S. 431, 438, 56 S.Ct. 532, 80 L.Ed. 778; Pinkerton v. United States, 328 U.S. 640, 641 n. 1, 66 S.Ct. 1180, 90 L.Ed. 1489; Marzani v. United States, 83 U.S.App.D.C. 78, 86, 168 F.2d 133, 141, affirmed by an equally divided court, 335 U.S. 895, 69 S.Ct. 299, 93 L.Ed. 431, 336 U.S. 922, 69 S.Ct. 653, 93 L.Ed. 1084. Nevertheless, we have carefully reviewed the evidence bearing on that count and find it inadequate to sustain a verdict finding appellant guilty of having stolen the articles therein enumerated. In these circumstances, we think the preferable procedure — whether required or not we need not decide, see Fulton v. United States, 45 App.D.C. 27, 42 — is to remand the cause with directions that the District Court either modify the judgment by entering a judgment of acquittal on the second count, or, in the alternative, vacate the judgment entirely, enter a judgment of acquittal on the second count and resentence appellant by reason of his conviction under the first count.

It is so ordered.

WILBUR K. MILLER, Circuit Judge,

(concurring in part and dissenting in part).

I agree that the evidence was inadequate to sustain a verdict finding Nelms guilty under the larceny count. The proof on which the jury found him guilty under the housebreaking count was, in my view, equally inadequate.

All the evidence introduced against this man was circumstantial. The circumstances proved were as consistent with innocence as with guilt. That being true, I think it is our duty to reverse the *680judgment of conviction. Hammond v. United States, 1942, 75 U.S.App.D.C. 397, 127 F.2d 752; United States v. Matsinger, 3 Cir., 1951, 191 F.2d 1014, 1016.
Exhibit 10.12
 EMPLOYEE CONFIDENTIALITY, NON-SOLICIT  NON-INTERFERENCE, NON-COMPETE AND SEVERANCE AGREEMENT
 AGREEMENT
      SEVERANCE PAYMENTS




---



##### 



i.
    
    Willful refusal to perform, in any material
respect, your duties or responsibilities for the Company;ii.
    
    Material breach of this Agreement or any other
confidentiality agreement, or your duties and responsibilities to the
Company;iii.
    
    Gross negligence or willful disregard in the
performance of your duties or responsibilities;iv.
    
    Willful disregard, in any material respect, of
any financial or other budgetary limitations established for you in
good faith by the Executives of the Chefs Warehouse Holdings,
LLC/Dairylandv.
    
    The commission or any act of omission involving
fraud with respect to any Company Entity or in connection with any
 2




---



##### 



relationship between any Company entity and any customer or supplier
thereof,vi.
    
    The use of illegal drugs and repetitive abuse
of other drugs or repetitive consumption of alcohol interfering with
the performance of your duties or any act of moral turpitude.
  CHANGE IN EMPLOYMENT STATUS
  NON-COMPETITION AND NON-SOLICITATION
 WITNESSETH:
    Introduction
 3




---



##### 



Confidentiality only
 4




---



##### 



Non-Solicitation Covenants
         5




---



##### 



Condition for Employment
 At Will Employment
 Employability of Employee
 6




---



##### 



Disclosure of Agreement
 Enforceability; Injunction
 Miscellaneous
   7




---



##### 



8




---



##### 



IN WITNESS WHEREOF
 /s/ James D. Wagner

Employee Signature
    
    
    
    4/16/2008

DateJames D. Wagner

Printed or Typed
Employee Name
 9
114TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 4150 

AN ACT 

To amend title 38, United States Code, to allow the Secretary of Veterans Affairs to modify the hours of employment of physicians employed on a full-time basis by 

the Department of Veterans Affairs. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 
2 

•HR 4150 EH

1 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

2 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Department of Vet3 erans Affairs Emergency Medical Staffing Recruitment 

4 and Retention Act’’. 

5 SEC. 2. MODIFICATION OF HOURS OF EMPLOYMENT FOR 

6 PHYSICIANS EMPLOYED BY THE DEPART7 MENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS. 

8 Section 7423(a) of title 38, United States Code, is 

9 amended— 

10 (1) by striking ‘‘(a) The hours’’ and inserting 

11 ‘‘(a)(1) Except as provided in paragraph (2), the 

12 hours’’; and 

13 (2) by adding at the end the following new 

14 paragraph: 

15 ‘‘(2)(A) Upon the advance written request of a cov16 ered physician, the Secretary may modify the hours of em17 ployment for a physician appointed in the Administration 

18 under any provision of this chapter on a full-time basis 

19 to be more or less than 80 hours in a biweekly pay period, 

20 subject to the requirements in subparagraph (B). For the 

21 purpose of determining pay, such a physician shall be 

22 deemed to have a biweekly schedule of 80 hours of employ23 ment. 

24 ‘‘(B) A physician with an irregular work schedule es25 tablished under subparagraph (A) shall be obligated to ac26 count for at least 2,080 hours of employment (through 
3 

•HR 4150 EH

1 performance of work or use of leave or paid time off) in 

2 a calendar year. 

3 ‘‘(C) The Secretary may prescribe regulations to im4 plement this paragraph, including regulations making ad5 justments to address the annual hours requirement for 

6 physicians who are covered by this paragraph for only a 

7 portion of a calendar year.’’. 

Passed the House of Representatives December 6, 

2016. 

Attest: 

Clerk. 
114TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 4150 

AN ACT 

To amend title 38, United States Code, to allow the 

fairs. time basis by the Department of Veterans Afof employment of physicians employed on a fullSecretary of Veterans Affairs to modify the hours
Editorial Note on Part 416
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 416 appear at 68 FR 53509, Sept. 11, 2003.

§ 416.1061 When we will provide performance support. ( a ) *Optional support.* We may offer, or a State may request, performance support at any time that the regular monitoring and review process reveals that support could enhance performance. The State does not have to be below the initial performance accuracy rate of 90.6 percent to receive performance support. Support will be offered, or granted upon request, based on available resources.
( b ) *Mandatory support.* ( 1 ) We will provide a State agency with performance support if regular monitoring and review reveal that two of three threshold levels (one of which must be performance accuracy) are not met for two consecutive calendar quarters.
( 2 ) We may also decide to provide a State agency with mandatory performance support if regular monitoring and review reveal that any one of the three threshold levels is not met for two consecutive calendar quarters. Support will be provided based on available resources.
( 3 ) The threshold levels are: ( i ) Combined title II and title XVI initial performance accuracy rate—90.6 percent,
( ii ) Title II initial processing time—49.5 days, and
( iii ) Title XVI initial processing time—57.9 days.
[56 FR 11023, Mar. 14, 1991]
#### § 24.258 Certificates of approval or exemption.

The proprietor shall obtain a certificate of label approval or a certificate of exemption from label approval as required by 27 CFR part 4.

(August 29, 1935, ch. 814, Sec. 5, 49 Stat. 981, as amended (27 U.S.C. 205))
#### § 404.703 When evidence is needed.

When you apply for benefits, we will ask for evidence that you are eligible for them. After you become entitled to benefits, we may ask for evidence showing whether you continue to be entitled to benefits; or evidence showing whether your benefit payments should be reduced or stopped. See § 404.401 for a list showing when benefit payments must be reduced or stopped.
In the United States Court of Federal Claims 

OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS

No. 16-0217V 

Filed: June 30, 2016

Unpublished

* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *

SANDRA RETZLAFF, * 

 * 

 Petitioner, * Ruling on Entitlement; Concession;

 * Influenza (“Flu”) Vaccine; Shoulder

v. * Injury Related to Vaccine Administration

 * (“SIRVA”); Special Processing Unit

SECRETARY OF HEALTH * (“SPU”)

AND HUMAN SERVICES, * 

 * 

 Respondent. * 

 * 

* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *

Jeffrey S. Pop, Attorney at Law, Beverly Hills, CA, for petitioner.

Traci R. Patton, U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, DC, for respondent.

RULING ON ENTITLEMENT1

Dorsey, Chief Special Master:

On February 12, 2016, Sandra Retzlaff (“petitioner”) filed a petition for 

compensation under the National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program, 42 U.S.C. 

§300aa-10, et seq.,

2 (the “Vaccine Act” or “Program”). Petitioner alleges that as a result 

of an influenza (“flu”) vaccination on November 14, 2013, she suffered a shoulder injury 

related to vaccine administration (“SIRVA”). Pet. at 1. The case was assigned to the 

Special Processing Unit (“SPU”) of the Office of Special Masters.

On June 29, 2016, respondent filed her Rule 4(c) Report in which she concedes 

that petitioner is entitled to compensation in this case. Rule 4(c) Rep. at 1. Specifically, 

respondent stated that the evidence establishes that petitioner’s injury is consistent with 

SIRVA, and that the injury was caused in fact by her flu vaccination on November 14, 

 

1 Because this unpublished ruling contains a reasoned explanation for the action in this case, the 

undersigned intends to post it on the United States Court of Federal Claims' website, in accordance with 

the E-Government Act of 2002. 44 U.S.C. § 3501 note (2012)(Federal Management and Promotion of 

Electronic Government Services). In accordance with Vaccine Rule 18(b), petitioner has 14 days to 

identify and move to redact medical or other information, the disclosure of which would constitute an 

unwarranted invasion of privacy. If, upon review, the undersigned agrees that the identified material fits 

within this definition, the undersigned will redact such material from public access.

2 National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act of 1986, Pub. L. No. 99-660, 100 Stat. 3755. Hereinafter, for 

ease of citation, all “§” references to the Vaccine Act will be to the pertinent subparagraph of 42 U.S.C. § 

300aa (2012).
2

2013. Id. at 4-5. Respondent further stated that petitioner met all statutory and 

jurisdictional requirements, including having suffered the condition for more than six 

months. Id. at 5. Thus, respondent concludes that entitlement to compensation is 

appropriate under the terms of the Vaccine Act. Id.

In view of respondent’s concession and the evidence of record, the 

undersigned finds that petitioner is entitled to compensation. 

IT IS SO ORDERED.

 s/Nora Beth Dorsey

Nora Beth Dorsey

 Chief Special Master
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY HIGH

 63

 60

 57

 60

 68

 72

 69

 66

 65

 58

 58

 58

 60

 61

 62

 60

 56

 56

 54

 57

 60

 61

 58

 55

 56

 56

 59

 63

 62

 60

 58

 61

 55

 55

 56

 60

 67

 64

 65

 57

 56

 56

 56

 55

 58

 58

 56

 55

 54

 53

 54

 55

 58

 54

 54

 55

 55

 56

 58

 60

 56

 42

 62

 57

 56

 58

 65

 69

 66

 66

 59

 57

 57

 57

 58

 59

 60

 57

 56

 55

 53

 55

 58

 59

 55

 55

 56

 56

 57

 61

 61

 57

 54

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

JULY 2019 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: August 1, 2019

HIGH LOW MEAN

 64.8

 63.3

 61.3

 63.2

 67.1

 69.1

 68.8

 68.2

 66.1

 61.6

 62.1

 62.0

 63.7

 65.6

 66.5

 65.3

 61.8

 61.8

 61.9

 63.3

 65.5

 66.3

 65.2

 61.7

 62.8

 62.0

 63.4

 65.5

 66.9

 64.9

 61.4

 61.4

 58.8

 58.6

 59.2

 62.8

 65.9

 66.5

 65.1

 59.4

 59.6

 60.2

 60.1

 60.0

 61.9

 63.8

 60.1

 60.3

 60.1

 59.9

 59.9

 61.6

 63.3

 59.8

 59.4

 60.3

 60.0

 60.3

 61.4

 64.0

 59.7

 59.7

 63.2

 60.1

 59.9

 61.2

 64.8

 67.5

 67.6

 66.6

 61.6

 60.5

 61.0

 60.9

 61.8

 63.7

 65.2

 61.5

 60.9

 60.8

 60.8

 61.5

 63.6

 65.1

 61.5

 60.4

 61.3

 60.9

 61.8

 63.6

 65.7

 61.0

 60.4

HIGH LOW MEAN

 9.2

 10.0

 10.1

 9.9

 8.7

 8.4

 8.6

 8.7

 9.9

 10.0

 9.9

 9.8

 9.8

 9.2

 9.0

 9.8

 9.8

 9.9

 9.9

 9.8

 9.2

 9.0

 9.9

 10.0

 9.9

 9.9

 9.8

 9.2

 9.0

 9.9

 10.0

 8.9

 9.3

 9.7

 8.7

 8.2

 8.1

 8.1

 8.2

 8.6

 9.6

 9.5

 9.5

 9.1

 8.6

 8.6

 9.1

 9.5

 9.5

 9.5

 9.2

 8.7

 8.7

 9.1

 9.6

 9.4

 9.5

 9.2

 8.6

 8.6

 9.1

 9.6

 9.0

 9.8

 9.9

 9.4

 8.5

 8.2

 8.3

 8.5

 9.5

 9.8

 9.7

 9.7

 9.4

 8.9

 8.8

 9.6

 9.6

 9.7

 9.7

 9.5

 9.0

 8.9

 9.7

 9.8

 9.7

 9.7

 9.5

 8.9

 8.8

 9.7

 9.8

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

RIPON ON THE STANISLAUS RIVER

 ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS WATER TEMPERATURE, DEG DISSOLVED OXYZEN, PPM
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY HIGH

 21,170

 20,661

 19,298

 18,370

 16,925

 16,289

 16,248

 16,715

 17,133

 16,969

 15,543

 16,094

 17,446

 16,294

 13,796

 11,912

 10,527

 0

 10,629

 12,132

 15,219

 16,112

 17,231

 16,838

 16,620

 16,392

 15,420

 15,131

 14,004

 13,085

 12,159

 4,976

 5,284

 5,152

 4,992

 5,931

 5,558

 5,995

 5,957

 5,753

 5,133

 3,937

 4,393

 4,892

 4,354

 4,066

 3,865

 6,287

 0

 5,201

 4,190

 5,432

 6,888

 6,012

 5,310

 5,492

 4,360

 3,831

 3,883

 3,483

 3,059

 2,783

 12,668

 12,576

 11,903

 11,714

 11,827

 11,570

 11,050

 10,392

 10,577

 10,337

 9,721

 10,483

 10,995

 10,279

 8,982

 7,877

 8,662

 0

 7,676

 7,870

 8,835

 10,742

 11,138

 10,830

 10,724

 10,262

 9,748

 9,277

 8,687

 7,964

 7,193

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

JULY 2003 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: August 7, 2003

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

PORT CHICAGO BOTTOM IN SUISUN BAY
Exhibit 8.2
  
   CPLP Registration Statement Commission Act Poseidon Crude Prospectus




---



##### 



Code Regulations U.S. Tax Law
   A.
    
    We express no opinion as to any laws other than the U.S. Tax Law.B.
    
    The opinion expressed herein is as of the date hereof. Any change in the U.S.
Tax Law (including pursuant to any legislation which Congress may be currently
considering), which may change at any time with retroactive or prospective effect and
which is subject to differing interpretation, or any change in the facts,
representations or documents upon which the opinion expressed herein is based, could
change our conclusions and render the opinion expressed herein inapplicable. We
undertake no obligation to advise you of any facts or circumstances that may come to
our attention, any new developments in the law or in the application or interpretation
of the Federal income tax laws, or any other change in legal authorities that may occur
after the date of this opinion letter, that may affect the opinion expressed herein or
to update the opinion expressed herein in the event that there is a change in the legal
authorities, facts or documents upon which the opinion expressed herein is based.C.
    
    This opinion represents and is based upon our best legal judgment regarding the
application of relevant current provisions of the Code and the Regulations, and
interpretations of the foregoing as expressed in existing court decisions,
administrative determinations (including the practices and procedures of the Internal
Revenue Service (the IRS) in issuing private letter rulings, which are not binding on
the IRS except with respect to the taxpayer that receives such a




---



##### 



ruling) and published rulings and procedures all as of the date hereof. An opinion
of counsel merely represents counsels best judgment with respect to the probable
outcome on the merits and is not binding on the IRS or the courts. There can be no
assurance that positions contrary to our opinion will not be taken by the IRS, or
that a court considering the issues would not hold contrary to our opinion. CPLP
has not requested a ruling from the IRS (and no ruling will be sought) as to any of
the Federal income tax consequences addressed in this opinion.D.
    
    The opinion expressed herein is limited to the matters expressly stated herein
and no opinion is to be inferred or may be implied beyond the tax opinion expressly set
forth above. This letter does not address any other Federal, state, local or foreign
tax consequences.E.
    
    No opinion is expressed if all of the representations, warranties, statements
and assumptions upon which we relied are not true and accurate at all relevant times.
In the event any one of the statements, representations, warranties or assumptions upon
which we have relied to issue this opinion is incorrect, our opinion might be adversely
affected and may not be relied upon.