# EUR-Lex - 52013DC0383 - EN

*|*

# 52013DC0383

**Recommendation for a COUNCIL RECOMMENDATION with a view to bringing an end to the situation of an excessive government deficit in Spain /* COM/2013/0383 final */**

			*

			*

Recommendation for a

COUNCIL RECOMMENDATION

with a view to bringing an end to the
situation of an excessive government deficit in Spain

THE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION,

Having regard to the
Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union and in particular Article
126(7) thereof,

Having regard to the
recommendation from the European Commission,

Whereas:

(1)       According to Article 126 of
the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (TFEU) Member States shall
avoid excessive government deficits.

(2)       The Stability and Growth
Pact is based on the objective of sound government finances as a means of
strengthening the conditions for price stability and for strong sustainable
growth conducive to employment creation.

(3)       On 27 April 2009, the
Council decided, in accordance with Article 104(6) of the Treaty establishing
the European Community (TEC), that an excessive deficit existed in Spain and
issued a recommendation to correct the excessive deficit by 2012 at the latest,
in accordance with Article 104(7) TEC and Article 3 of Council Regulation (EC)
No 1467/97 of 7 July 1997 on speeding up and clarifying the implementation of
the excessive deficit procedure [1].

(4)       On 2 December 2009, the
Council decided, in accordance with Article 3(5) of Council Regulation (EC) No
1467/97, that effective action had been taken and that unexpected adverse
economic events with major unfavourable consequences for government finances had
occurred after the adoption of that recommendation.[2] Notably, the sharp
deterioration in the growth outlook in the wake of the global economic and
financial crisis had major negative budgetary implications. As a result, the
Council decided to adopted a revised recommendation under Article 126(7) TFEU
to correct the excessive deficit by 2013 at the latest in a credible and
sustainable manner by taking action in a medium-term framework.

(5)       On 15 June 2010, the Commission
concluded that Spain had taken effective action in compliance with the Council
recommendation of 2 December 2009 to bring its government deficit below the 3% of
GDP reference value and considered that no additional step in the excessive
deficit procedure was therefore necessary.

(6)       On 10 July 2012, the
Council decided, in accordance with Article 3(5) of Council Regulation (EC) No
1467/97, that effective action had been taken but that unexpected adverse
economic events with major unfavourable consequences for government finances had
occurred after the adoption of the revised recommendation in 2009. Notably, a
worsening in the growth outlook and the shift to a less tax-rich growth
composition had major negative budgetary implications. The Council therefore
adopted a revised recommendation under Article 126(7) TFEU ("the revised
EDP recommendation") and recommended Spain to correct the excessive
deficit by 2014 at the latest. In order to bring the headline government
deficit below the 3% of GDP reference value by 2014, Spain was recommended to deliver
an improvement of the structural balance of 2.7% of GDP in 2012, 2.5% of GDP in
2013 and 1.9% of GDP in 2014, based on the Commission
services' update of the 2012 Spring Forecast. The headline deficit targets were
set at 6.3% of GDP for 2012, 4.5% of GDP for 2013 and 2.8% of GDP in
2014. Spain was also recommended to implement the measures adopted in the 2012
budget and in the Autonomous Communities’ rebalancing plans and to adopt the
announced multi-annual budget plan for 2013-14 by the end of July 2012,
including a medium-term budgetary strategy, which would fully specify the
structural measures necessary to achieve the correction of the excessive
deficit by 2014.

(7)       On 14 November 2012, the
Commission concluded, based on the Commission services' 2012 Autumn Forecast, that
Spain had taken effective action in compliance with the revised Council
recommendation of 10 July 2012 and that no further steps in the excessive
deficit procedure were required.

(8)       According to Article 3(5)
of Regulation (EC) No 1467/97, the Council may decide, on a recommendation from
the Commission, to adopt a revised recommendation under Article 126(7) TFEU, if
effective action has been taken and unexpected adverse economic events with
major unfavourable consequences for government finances occur after the
adoption of that recommendation. The occurrence of unexpected adverse economic
events with major unfavourable budgetary effects shall be assessed against the
economic forecast underlying the Council recommendation.

(9)       In accordance with Article
126(7) of the TFEU and Article 3 of Council Regulation (EC) No 1467/97, the
Council is required to make recommendations to the Member State concerned with
a view to bringing the situation of excessive deficit to an end within a given
period. The recommendation has to establish a maximum deadline of six months
for effective action to be taken by the Member State concerned to correct the
excessive deficit. Furthermore, in a recommendation to correct an excessive
deficit the Council should request the achievement of annual budgetary targets
which, on the basis of the forecast underpinning the recommendation, are
consistent with a minimum annual improvement in the structural balance, i.e.
the cyclically-adjusted balance excluding one-off and other temporary measures,
of at least 0.5% of GDP as a benchmark.

(10)     After a short-lived
recovery in 2011 the economy has slipped back into recession, recording
negative quarterly real GDP growth since the third quarter of 2011. In annual
terms, GDP fell by 1.4% in 2012. According to the Commission services' 2013 Spring
Forecast, the recession is set to continue in 2013, with positive net exports
still not able to offset the on-going contraction of domestic demand. Output is
expected to stabilise only towards the end of 2013. Real GDP is thus projected
to contract by 1.5% in 2013, before growing by 0.9% in 2014 (under a
no-policy-change assumption). At the time of the last Council recommendation,
real GDP was expected to contract by 1.9% and 0.3% in 2012 and 2013,
respectively, and to grow by 1.1% in 2014. The less negative growth outcome in 2012
was mainly due to somewhat more resilient domestic demand possibly also thanks
to the liquidity injected via the repayment scheme for the commercial debt
accumulated by the regions and local authorities before 1 January 2012 (EUR
27.4 bn, or 2.6% of GDP). Regarding 2013 and 2014, the Commission services'
2013 Spring Forecast envisages a sharper contraction of real GDP in 2013 and a
more subdued recovery in 2014. This includes a sharper drop in domestic demand
in both years and a more protracted slump in employment. The deterioration in
the macroeconomic outlook is partly linked to additional consolidation measures
included in the 2013-14 budget plan and the 2013 budget being taken into
account.

(11)     According to the Commission
services' 2013 Spring Forecast, the general government deficit reached 10.6% of
GDP in 2012, compared with a government and EDP target of 6.3% of GDP and a
9.4% of GDP outcome in 2011. Adjusting for capital transfers to banks (which
are considered as one-off operations), the corresponding deficits were 7.0% and
9.0% of GDP in 2012 and 2011, respectively. The decrease
in the headline balance corresponds to an improvement in the primary balance of
2.4 pps. (net of capital transfers into banks), against the background of a
shrinking economy and a tax-weak growth composition. The Commission
services' 2013 Spring Forecast points to an improvement in the structural
deficit of 1.8 pps. in 2012, compared with a recommended improvement of 2.7
pps. Correcting for the slight downward revision of potential output since the last
Council recommendation, the estimated fiscal effort remains unchanged. However,
the estimated change in the structural balance was severely affected by unexpected
revenue shortfalls, which amounted to around 1.0 pp. Overall, taking these
effects into account, the adjusted fiscal effort would increase to 2.9 pps., above
the recommended effort under the revised EDP recommendation. Apart from
recapitalisation measures, the budgetary deviation in 2012 is linked to a
combination of weaker-than-expected revenues (taking into account the impact of
discretionary measures and the base effect) and higher intermediate consumption
and social transfers. The less tax-rich growth composition and a stronger
deterioration in the labour market implied major revenue shortfalls, notably of
direct and indirect taxes, as well as higher social expenditure. Spain adopted
sizeable consolidation measures during 2012, amounting to around 4% of GDP,
including around 11⁄2% of GDP on the revenue side and 21⁄2% of GDP on the
expenditure side. These measures partly compensated also for an underlying
deterioration in the structural balance due to rising interest payments and
higher social transfers.

(12)     For 2013, according to the
Commission services' 2013 Spring Forecast, the government deficit is projected
to decline to 6.5% of GDP, compared to the EDP target of 4.5% of GDP. The
primary balance is expected to improve by 4.5 pps. (0.9 pps net of capital transfers
into banks). Following the last Council recommendation, the Spanish government
presented in August 2012 a multi-annual budget plan for 2013-14, outlining some
features of the consolidation strategy for the medium-term. In total, the budgetary
impact of discretionary measures in 2013 is estimated to be about 1% of GDP on
the expenditure side and about 11⁄2% of GDP on the revenue side. The expected budgetary
deviation of around 2% of GDP compared with the EDP target is partly explained
by the worse starting position. However, the main factor behind the deviation
is the unfavourable growth composition, with private consumption contracting
more strongly and the labour market performing worse than expected in the revised
EDP recommendation. The Commission services' 2013 Spring Forecast projects the
structural deficit to further narrow by 1.1 pps. in 2013, compared with a
recommended effort of 2.5 pps. Correcting for the change in the estimated
potential growth and for higher-than expected revenue shortfalls, the estimated
fiscal effort improves by 1.4 pps., bringing the adjusted fiscal effort to 2.5%
of GDP, in line with the recommended effort in the revised EDP recommendation.
In its 2013 Stability Programme, the Spanish government announced a general
government deficit target of 6.3% of GDP for 2013, to be underpinned by
additional consolidation measures of around EUR 3 bn. (0.3% of GDP) still to be
adopted and implemented this year.

(13)     For 2014, the headline
deficit is expected to widen to 7.0% of GDP compared to an EDP target of 2.8%
of GDP. The primary deficit would widen by 0.4% of GDP. Apart from the base
effect, the expected deviation mainly reflects the expiry of temporary measures
taken in previous years and the fact that the planned consolidation measures
for 2014 were not sufficiently specified in the August 2012 multi-annual budget
plan to be included in the Commission services' forecast. Moreover, the
composition of economic growth would continue to be tax-poor, with social
contributions and indirect taxes not rising in full proportion to nominal GDP.
Interest payments would also keep rising due to a higher debt stock. According
to the Commission services' 2013 Spring Forecast, the structural deficit is
projected to deteriorate by 1.1 pps., compared to a recommended improvement of
1.9% of GDP. Correcting for the change in the estimated potential growth and
unexpected revenue shortfalls, the gap increases by a further 0.2 pps.

(14)     As regards fiscal
governance, major progress has been made in the reporting of budgetary
execution at sub-central government levels. However, the provisions of the
Budgetary Stability Law on early warning and corrective mechanisms to limit budgetary
deviations have not been fully effective and the transparency of their
implementation could be enhanced. Despite progress with respect to budgetary
reporting at regional level, achieving higher fiscal transparency would require
more comprehensive, consistent and timely reporting, also of budgetary plans,
on a consolidated general government basis in line with ESA 95. The establishment
of a fiscal council, with full institutional and financial independence, is
still pending.

(15)     General government gross
debt rose to around 84% of GDP in 2012 compared to 80.9% of GDP projected in
the updated Commission services' 2012 Spring Forecast. The increase in the debt
ratio was due to a higher than expected deficit outcome, lower nominal GDP
growth, costs of bank recapitalisation operations and the payment of public
administration arrears. According to the Commission services' 2013 Spring Forecast,
the debt-to-GDP ratio is expected to increase further and to exceed 95% in
2014, based on a no-policy-change scenario, thus exceeding the Treaty reference
value in all years.

(16)     On 10 April 2013, the
Commission concluded, based on its 2013 In-Depth Review on Spain under the
Macroeconomic Imbalances Procedure[3],
that Spain is experiencing excessive macroeconomic imblances. The correction of
these imbalances accumulated during the boom years, and in particular the
absorption of very high private and external debt levels, are having major
negative consequences on economic growth, financial stability and public
finances. A sustainable correction of the excessive deficit in the medium-term
requires simultaneous progress on ensuring the correction of macroeconomic
imbalances, supported by structural reforms to boost growth and employment
creation and to reduce structural rigidities that hamper the adjustment.

(17)     According to the Commission
services' 2013 Spring Forecast, Spain will not meet the nominal budgetary
targets established in the Council Recommendation of 10 July 2012. However,
Spain has implemented a structural effort in 2012 and 2013 which, account taken
of the unexpected adverse economic developments compared to when the Council
recommendation was issued, is in line with the revised EDP recommendation. These
unexpected adverse economic developments have entailed major unfavourable
consequences for government finances. In particular, significant revenue
shortfalls linked to the on-going rebalancing of the economy towards a less
tax-rich growth structure and associated negative effects on revenue
elasticites have led to a substantial deterioration in the budgetary position. Moreover,
the economic recession has affected employment in a very negative way and
unemployment has risen sharply. Considering all these factors, consistent with
the rules of the Stability and Growth Pact and including the need to correct
excessive macroeconomic imbalances with major unfavourable consequences for
public finance, an extension of the deadline for correcting the excessive
deficit in Spain by two years to 2016 appears to be warranted.

(18)     Against the background of
high uncertainties regarding economic and budgetary developments, the budgetary
target recommended for the final year of the correction period should be set at
a level clearly below the reference value, in order to guarantee an effective
and lasting achievement of the correction within the requested deadline.

(19)     The intermediate headline
deficit targets leading to the correction of the excessive deficit by 2016 are
set at 6.5% of GDP for 2013, 5.8% of GDP for 2014, 4.2% of GDP for 2015, and 2.8%
of GDP for 2016. Achieving these targets requires an annual improvement in the
primary balance (net of one-off measures) of 1.3% of GDP on average over the
period 2013-16 and, on the basis of the Commission services' 2013 Spring Forecast
extended to 2016, an improvement in the structural budget balance of 1.1% of
GDP in 2013, 0.8% of GDP in 2014, 0.8% of GDP in 2015, and 1.2% of GDP in 2016.
This more gradual adjustment path takes into account the current difficult
economic environment and the on-going major structural transformation of the
Spanish economy and will have to be supported by ambitious structural reforms.
As such, it is expected to support the unwinding of external and internal
macroeconomic imbalances, mitigate the negative short-term impact of fiscal
consolidation on economic growth, while still stabilising and reversing the
upward trend in general government debt.

(20)     According to the Commission
services' 2013 Spring Forecast extended to 2016, which is based on a no-policy
change assumption, no additional measures appear needed at this stage to
achieve the recommended improvement in the structural balance for 2013 (and the
new 6.5% of GDP deficit target), but the budgetary plans at all levels of
government will have to be strictly implemented. For the period 2014-2016,
bringing the deficit below the Treaty reference value on a sustainable basis
will require considerable structural fiscal measures on top of those already
included in the Commission services' 2013 Spring Forecast. Those measures,
amounting to around 2% of GDP in 2014, 1% of GDP in 2015, and 11⁄2% of GDP in
2016 should take into account the need to compensate for the negative
second-round effects, negative potential output growth, as well as rising
interest and social payments.

(21)     The 2013 Stability Programme
envisages an adjustment path which is broadly consistent with the correction of
the excessive deficit by 2016, targeting headline deficits of 6.3% of GDP in
2013, 5.5% in 2014, 4.1% in 2015, and 2.7% in 2016. For 2013, the target is
based on additional consolidation measures of around EUR 3 bn envisaged in the
programme, which still need to be fully specified.

(22)     Budgetary consolidation
measures should secure a lasting improvement in the general government balance,
while being geared towards enhancing the quality of the public finances and
reinforcing the growth potential of the economy.

(23)     Spain faces high risks to
sustainability in a medium-term perspective and medium risks in the long run.
Returning to a higher structural primary balance, around -0.5% of GDP as it was
on average in the period 1998-2012, would help contain these risks. The 2013
reform of early retirement schemes is expected to contribute to the long-term
sustainability of the social security system. However, further measures to
contain age-related expenditure growth appears necessary, e.g. via the
appropriate regulation of the sustainability factor foreseen by the 2011 reform
of the pension system, including by providing that the retirement age will rise
in line with gains in life expectancy.

(24)     In view of the
decentralised nature of its public finances, Spain's fiscal adjustment path should
be underpinned by a credible medium-term consolidation strategy that includes
(i) a detailed multi-annual budget plan with full specification of measures for
2014-16, (ii) further strengthening the effectiveness of the institutional
framework (by raising further the transparency in implementation of the Budgetary
Stability Law as well as by establishing an independent fiscal council), (iii)
undertaking concrete steps to rein in the mounting structural deficit in the
social security system, and (iv) giving a greater emphasis to the growth
friendliness of the consolidation (including by conducting systematic
expenditure reviews as well as reviews of the tax system).

(25)     In parallel to the regular
reviews of the ESM Financial Assistance for the Recapitalisation of Financial
Institutions in Spain[4]
and as agreed in the Memorandum of Understanding signed on 23 July 2012,
monitoring of progress on implementation of Spain's EDP commitments will be
carried out on a quarterly basis.

(26)     Spain fulfils the
conditions for the extension of the deadline for correcting the excessive general
government deficit as laid out in Article 3(5) of Regulation (EC) No 1467/97 on
speeding up and clarifying the implementation of the excessive deficit
procedure,

HAS ADOPTED THIS RECOMMENDATION:

(1)
Spain should put an end to the present excessive
deficit situation by 2016.

(2)
Spain should reach a
headline deficit target of 6.5% of GDP in 2013, 5.8% of GDP in 2014, 4.2% of
GDP in 2015, and 2.8% of GDP in 2016, which, based on the Commission services'
2013 Spring Forecast extended to 2016, is consistent with an improvement of the
structural balance of 1.1%, 0.8%, 0.8%, and 1.2% of GDP in the years 2013-2016 respectively.

(3)
Spain should implement the measures adopted in
the 2013 budget plans at all levels of government and stand ready to take
corrective action in case of deviations from budgetary plans. The authorities
should reinforce the medium-term budgetary strategy with well-specified
structural measures for the years 2014-16 that are necessary to achieve the
correction of the excessive deficit by 2016.

(4)
The Council establishes the deadline of 1
October 2013 for the Spanish government to take effective action and, in
accordance with Article 3(4a) of Council Regulation (EC) No 1467/97, to report in
detail the consolidation strategy that is envisaged to achieve the targets.

Furthermore, the Spanish authorities should
(i) strengthen the effectiveness of the institutional framework by raising further
the transparency in implementation of the Budgetary Stability Law as well as by
establishing an independent fiscal council to provide analysis, advice and
monitor compliance of fiscal policy with national and EU fiscal rules, (ii)
undertake concrete steps to rein in the increasing structural deficit in the
social security system, and (iii) give a greater emphasis to the growth friendliness
of the consolidation, including by conducting systematic reviews of expenditure
and the tax system. In addition, to ensure the
success of the fiscal consolidation strategy, it will be important to back the
fiscal consolidation by comprehensive structural reforms, in line with the
Council recommendations addressed to Spain in the context of the European
Semester and the Macroeconomic Imbalances Procedure.

This
recommendation is addressed to the Kingdom of Spain.

Done at Brussels,

For
the Council

The
President

[1]               OJ L 209, 2.8.1997, p. 6.

[2]               All documents related to the excessive deficit
procedure for Spain can be found at:             
http://ec.europa.eu/economy_finance/economic_governance/sgp/deficit/countries/spain_en.htm

[3]               http://ec.europa.eu/economy_finance/publications/occasional_paper/2013/op134_en.htm

[4]               http://ec.europa.eu/economy_finance/assistance_eu_ms/spain/index_en.htm