alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
##### 



EXHIBIT 32.1

WRITTEN STATEMENT OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

The undersigned, the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of
Cuisine Solutions, Inc. (the Company), each hereby certifies that, to his
knowledge on the date hereof:



| | (a) |  | the Quarterly Report pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 of the Company for the period ended
December 13, 2003 filed on the date hereof with the Securities and
Exchange Commission (the Report) fully complies with the requirements
of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- |  | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|
| | (b) |  | information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
the Company.                                                                                                                                                                                                

|                                         |  |                                                                                                            |  |                 
|---------------------------------------- |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- |  | ----------------
|/s/ Stanislas VilgrainStanislas Vilgrain |  | President,
Chief Executive Officer                                                                         |  | January 27, 2004
|                                        
|/s/ Y. Tristan KuoY. Tristan Kuo         |  | Vice President of Finance,
Treasurer and Corporate
Secretary (Principal Financial
And Accounting Official) |  | January 27, 2004
```

[Congressional Bills 114th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 4096 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

114th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 4096

  To amend the Volcker Rule to permit certain investment advisers to 
  share a similar name with a private equity fund, subject to certain 
                 restrictions, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           November 19, 2015

  Mr. Capuano (for himself and Mr. Stivers) introduced the following 
    bill; which was referred to the Committee on Financial Services

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To amend the Volcker Rule to permit certain investment advisers to 
  share a similar name with a private equity fund, subject to certain 
                 restrictions, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Investor Clarity and Bank Parity 
Act''.

SEC. 2. NAMING RESTRICTIONS.

    Section 13 of the Bank Holding Company Act of 1956 (12 U.S.C. 1851) 
is amended--
            (1) in subsection (d)(1)(G)(vi), by inserting before the 
        semicolon the following: ``, except that the hedge fund or 
        private equity fund may share the same name or a variation of 
        the same name as a banking entity that is an investment adviser 
        to the hedge fund or private equity find, if--
                                    ``(I) such investment adviser is 
                                not an insured depository institution, 
                                a company that controls an insured 
                                depository institution, or a company 
                                that is treated as a bank holding 
                                company for purposes of section 8 of 
                                the International Banking Act of 1978;
                                    ``(II) such investment adviser does 
                                not share the same name or a variation 
                                of the same name as an insured 
                                depository institution, any company 
                                that controls an insured depository 
                                institution, or any company that is 
                                treated as a bank holding company for 
                                purposes of section 8 of the 
                                International Banking Act of 1978; and
                                    ``(III) such name does not contain 
                                the word `bank'''; and
            (2) in subsection (h)(5)(C), by inserting before the period 
        the following: ``, except as permitted under subsection 
        (d)(1)(G)(vi)''.
                                 <all>
```
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY HIGH

 249

 244

 244

 234

 229

 235

 238

 237

 239

 244

 235

 239

 238

 242

 243

 242

 241

 243

 243

 237

 241

 234

 239

 241

 237

 231

 230

 227

 225

 227

 221

 184

 187

 182

 183

 184

 194

 189

 176

 173

 200

 205

 210

 213

 217

 208

 209

 202

 199

 191

 194

 194

 196

 194

 190

 191

 188

 188

 190

 185

 187

 183

 221

 220

 216

 208

 207

 216

 223

 219

 219

 227

 226

 229

 227

 231

 231

 230

 229

 230

 226

 223

 223

 225

 224

 223

 222

 217

 218

 214

 210

 212

 207

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

MARCH 2010 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: April 2, 2010

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

SAN ANDREAS ON THE SAN JOAQUIN RIVER
Exhibit 23.3

CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

We have issued our report dated March 17, 2008, accompanying the consolidated financial statements and management's assessment of the effectiveness of
internal control over financial reporting included in the Annual Report of ATS Corporation on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2007. We hereby consent to the
incorporation by reference of said report in the Registration Statements of ATS Corporation on Forms S-3 (No. 333-124638) and S-8 (No. 333-146075).

| |  | /s/ Grant Thornton LLP
| |  | ----------------------

McLean,
Virginia
March 17, 2008

---



QuickLinks
Editorial Note on Part 416
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 416 appear at 68 FR 53509, Sept. 11, 2003.

§ 416.1240 Disposition of resources. ( a ) Where the resources of an individual (and spouse, if any) are determined to exceed the limitations prescribed in § 416.1205, such individual (and spouse, if any) shall not be eligible for payment except under the conditions provided in this section. Payment will be made to an individual (and spouse, if any) if the individual agrees in writing to: ( 1 ) Dispose of, at current market value, the nonliquid resources (as defined in § 416.1201(c)) in excess of the limitations prescribed in § 416.1205 within the time period specified in § 416.1242; and
( 2 ) Repay any overpayments (as defined in § 416.1244) with the proceeds of such disposition.
( b ) Payment made for the period during which the resources are being disposed of will be conditioned upon the disposition of those resources as prescribed in paragraphs (a)(1) and (a)(2) of this section. Any payments so made are (at the time of disposition) considered overpayments to the extent they would not have been paid had the disposition occurred at the beginning of the period for which such payments were made.
( c ) If an individual fails to dispose of the resources as prescribed in paragraphs (a)(1) and (a)(2) of this section, regardless of the efforts he or she makes to dispose of them, the resources will be counted at their current market value and the individual will be ineligible due to excess resources. We will use the original estimate of current market value unless the individual submits evidence establishing a lower value (e.g., an estimate from a disinterested knowledgeable source).
[75 FR 1274, Jan. 11, 2010]
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY HIGH

 586

 688

 591

 565

 595

 585

 608

 650

 628

 648

 592

 610

 791

 958

 645

 549

 525

 476

 530

 518

 485

 462

 457

 575

 675

 545

 500

 479

 508

 544

 515

 212

 209

 190

 245

 208

 225

 275

 270

 233

 216

 207

 194

 217

 196

 195

 190

 185

 188

 222

 231

 234

 236

 282

 196

 270

 188

 214

 236

 195

 230

 230

 374

 358

 351

 370

 392

 405

 415

 415

 402

 399

 394

 408

 435

 489

 440

 389

 392

 388

 406

 400

 366

 374

 390

 392

 426

 378

 366

 375

 384

 391

 402

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

OCTOBER 2014 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: November 3, 2014

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

SAN ANDREAS ON THE SAN JOAQUIN RIVER
§ 411.420 What information should be included in an agreement between an EN and a State VR agency? The agreement between an EN and a State VR agency should state the conditions under which the State VR agency will provide services to a beneficiary when the beneficiary is referred by the EN to the State VR agency for services. Examples of this information include- ( a ) Procedures for making referrals and sharing information that will assist in providing services;
( b ) A description of the financial responsibilities of each party to the agreement;
( c ) The terms and procedures under which the EN will pay the State VR agency for providing services; and
( d ) Procedures for resolving disputes under the agreement.
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
 FORM 6-K
 Report of Foreign Issuer
Pursuant to Rule 13a-16 or 15d-16
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
 For
the month of July 2011
  EKSPORTFINANS ASA
  
   Form 20-F þ
    
    Form 40 F o
  Yes o
    
    No þ




---



##### 



Date: July 21, 2011
    EKSPORTFINANS ASABy:

/s/
KJELL DANIELSENKjell DanielsenAuthorized Signatory




---



##### 



Exhibit
    
    Description99.1
    
    Table of Capitalization and Indebtedness.
| Subsidiary                  | Country of Incorporation | Percentage Ownership |
|-----------------------------|--------------------------|----------------------|
| Galveston Navigation Inc.   | Marshall Islands         | 100%                 |
| Beaumont Navigation Inc.    | Marshall Islands         | 100%                 |
| Carrolton Navigation Inc.   | Marshall Islands         | 100%                 |
| Decatur Navigation Inc.     | Marshall Islands         | 100%                 |
| Elgin Navigation Inc.       | Marshall Islands         | 100%                 |
| Fulton Navigation Inc.      | Marshall Islands         | 100%                 |
| Orange Navigation Inc.      | Marshall Islands         | 100%                 |
| Baytown Navigation Inc.     | Marshall Islands         | 100%                 |
| Tyler Navigation Inc.       | Marshall Islands         | 100%                 |
| Pasedena Navigation Inc.    | Marshall Islands         | 100%                 |
| Sunray Navigation Inc.      | Marshall Islands         | 100%                 |
| Nederland Navigation Inc.   | Marshall Islands         | 100%                 |
| Lakeview Navigation Inc.    | Marshall Islands         | 100%                 |
| Abilene Navigation Inc.     | Marshall Islands         | 100%                 |
| Hamilton Navigation Inc.    | Marshall Islands         | 100%                 |
| Lemannville Navigation Inc. | Marshall Islands         | 100%                 |
| Turneville Navigation Inc.  | Marshall Islands         | 100%                 |
| Omega Management Inc.       | Marshall Islands         | 100%                 |
| Omnicrom Holdings Ltd.      | Marshall Islands         | 100%                 |
| Omega Navigation (USA) LLC  | United States            | 100%                 |
| Fire Navigation Inc.        | Marshall Islands         | 50%                  |
| Hurricane Navigation Inc.   | Marshall Islands         | 50%                  |
| Ice Navigation Inc.         | Marshall Islands         | 50%                  |
| Lightning Navigation Inc.   | Marshall Islands         | 50%                  |
| Rain Navigation Inc.        | Marshall Islands         | 50%                  |
|                        |                     |                 |
§ 404.1519p Reviewing reports of consultative examinations. ( a ) We will review the report of the consultative examination to determine whether the specific information requested has been furnished. We will consider the following factors in reviewing the report: ( 1 ) Whether the report provides evidence which serves as an adequate basis for decisionmaking in terms of the impairment it assesses;
( 2 ) Whether the report is internally consistent; Whether all the diseases, impairments and complaints described in the history are adequately assessed and reported in the clinical findings; Whether the conclusions correlate the findings from your medical history, clinical examination and laboratory tests and explain all abnormalities;
( 3 ) Whether the report is consistent with the other information available to us within the specialty of the examination requested; Whether the report fails to mention an important or relevant complaint within that specialty that is noted in other evidence in the file (e.g., your blindness in one eye, amputations, pain, alcoholism, depression);
( 4 ) Whether this is an adequate report of examination as compared to standards set out in the course of a medical education; and
( 5 ) Whether the report is properly signed.
( b ) If the report is inadequate or incomplete, we will contact the medical source who performed the consultative examination, give an explanation of our evidentiary needs, and ask that the medical source furnish the missing information or prepare a revised report.
( c ) With your permission, or when the examination discloses new diagnostic information or test results that reveal a potentially life-threatening situation, we will refer the consultative examination report to your treating source. When we refer the consultative examination report to your treating source without your permission, we will notify you that we have done so.
( d ) We will perform ongoing special management studies on the quality of consultative examinations purchased from major medical sources and the appropriateness of the examinations authorized.
( e ) We will take steps to ensure that consultative examinations are scheduled only with medical sources who have access to the equipment required to provide an adequate assessment and record of the existence and level of severity of your alleged impairments.
[56 FR 36959, Aug. 1, 1991, as amended at 65 FR 11877, Mar. 7, 2000]
### §277d–41. American-Mexican Boundary Treaty, Presidio flood control project; authorization of flood control agreement

The Secretary of State, acting through the Commissioner, is hereby authorized to conclude with the appropriate official or officials of the Government of Mexico an agreement for a coordinated plan by the United States and Mexico for international flood control works for protection of lands along the international section of the Rio Grande in the United States and in Mexico in the Presidio-Ojinaga Valley.

(Pub. L. 92–549, title II, §201, Oct. 25, 1972, 86 Stat. 1163.)
**EXHIBIT 31.2****WRITTEN STATEMENT OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF2002**I, Y. Tristan Kuo, certify that:1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Cuisine Solutions, Inc.;2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement of a materialfact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of thecircumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this quarterly report;3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included inthis quarterly report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results ofoperations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterlyreport.4. The registrant’s other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls andprocedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating tothe registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others withinthose entities, particularly during the period in which this quarterly report is being prepared;b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures andpresented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls andprocedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; andc) disclosed in this quarterly report any change in the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter that hasmaterially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internalcontrol over financial reporting; and5. The registrant’s other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the auditcommittee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internalcontrols over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect theregistrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; andb) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have asignificant role in the registrant’s internal controls over financial reporting.Date:October 25, 2005   /s/ Y. Tristan Kuo     Y. Tristan Kuo  Chief Financial Officer, Treasurer  and Corporate Secretary  
29
# C_2016065EN.01025701.xml

| 19.2.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 65/257 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

19.2.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 65/257

---

P7_TA(2013)0272

Stepping-stone Economic Partnership Agreement between the EC and Central Africa ***

European Parliament legislative resolution of 13 June 2013 on the draft Council decision concluding the interim agreement with a view to an Economic Partnership Agreement between the European Community and its Member States, of the one part, and the Central Africa Party, of the other part (14757/2012 — C7-0369/2012 — 2008/0139(NLE))

(Consent)

(2016/C 065/51)

The European Parliament,

The European Parliament

| — | having regard to the draft Council decision (14757/2012), |
| --- | --- |

—

having regard to the draft Council decision (14757/2012),

| — | having regard to the draft Interim Agreement with a view to an Economic Partnership Agreement between the European Community and its Member States, of the one part, and the Central Africa Party, of the other part (13485/2011), |
| --- | --- |

—

having regard to the draft Interim Agreement with a view to an Economic Partnership Agreement between the European Community and its Member States, of the one part, and the Central Africa Party, of the other part (13485/2011),

| — | having regard to the request for consent submitted by the Council in accordance with Article 207, Article 211 and Article 218(6), second subparagraph, point (a), of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (C7-0369/2012), |
| --- | --- |

—

having regard to the request for consent submitted by the Council in accordance with Article 207, Article 211 and Article 218(6), second subparagraph, point (a), of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (C7-0369/2012),

| — | having regard to Rules 81 and 90(7) of its Rules of Procedure, |
| --- | --- |

—

having regard to Rules 81 and 90(7) of its Rules of Procedure,

| — | having regard to the recommendation of the Committee on International Trade and the opinion of the Committee on Development (A7-0190/2013), |
| --- | --- |

—

having regard to the recommendation of the Committee on International Trade and the opinion of the Committee on Development (A7-0190/2013),

| 1. | Consents to conclusion of the agreement; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Consents to conclusion of the agreement;

| 2. | Instructs its President to forward its position to the Council, the Commission and the governments and parliaments of the Member States and of the Republic of Cameroon. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Instructs its President to forward its position to the Council, the Commission and the governments and parliaments of the Member States and of the Republic of Cameroon.

---
###### Editorial Note on Part 416

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 416 appear at 68 FR 53509, Sept. 11, 2003.

#### § 416.1040 General.

The following sections provide the procedures and guidelines we use to determine whether the State agency is substantially complying with our regulations and other written guidelines, including meeting established national performance standards. We use performance standards to help assure effective and uniform administration of our disability program and to measure whether the performance of the disability determination function by each State agency is acceptable. Also, the standards are designed to improve overall State agency performance in the disability determination process and to ensure that benefits are made available to all eligible persons in an accurate and efficient manner. We measure the performance of a State agency in two areas—processing time and quality of documentation and decisions on claims. State agency compliance is also judged by State agency adherence to other program requirements.

[56 FR 11023, Mar. 14, 1991]
### §1642g. Consolidated awards

With respect to any claim under section 1642c of this title which, at the time of the award, is vested in persons other than the person by whom the loss was sustained, the Commission may issue a consolidated award in favor of all claimants then entitled thereto, which award shall indicate the respective interests of such claimants therein, and all such claimants shall participate, in proportion to their indicated interests, in the payments authorized by this subchapter in all respects as if the award had been in favor of a single person.

(Mar. 10, 1950, ch. 54, title IV, §408, as added Pub. L. 85–604, §1, Aug. 8, 1958, 72 Stat. 529.)