alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
### §2424. Repealed. Pub. L. 95–88, title I, §123(c), Aug. 3, 1977, 91 Stat. 541

Section, Pub. L. 87–195, pt. III, §664, as added Pub. L. 93–559, §33, Dec. 30, 1974, 88 Stat. 1805, authorized the President to waive provisions which prohibited assistance to countries trading with designated countries.
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 98-20799 Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus ADIELE C. ONWUASOANYA; MARY E. ONWUASOANYA, Defendants-Appellants.

- - - - - - - - - - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. H-91-CR-218-1

- - - - - - - - - - April 19, 1999 Before JONES, SMITH, and DUHÉ, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: * Adiele Chukwu Onwuasoanya, federal prisoner # 59543-079, requests leave to appeal in forma pauperis (IFP) the district court's denial of his “Ex Parte Motion for Discovery of the Character of the District Court.” Onwuasoanya’s motion was “unauthorized and without a jurisdictional basis.” See United States v. Early , 27 F.3d 140, 141 (5th Cir. 1994). Because Onwuasoanya’s appeal fails to present a nonfrivolous issue, his motion for IFP is DENIED. See Jackson v. Dallas Police Dep't ,No. 98-20799 -2- 811 F.2d 260, 261 (5th Cir. 1986). The appeal is DISMISSED. 5th Cir. R. 42.2. We caution Onwuasoanya that any additional frivolous appeals filed by him or on his behalf will invite the imposition of sanctions. To avoid sanctions, Onwuasoanya should review any pending appeals to ensure that they do not raise arguments that are frivolous. Although Onwuasoanya purports to move for leave to proceed IFP on appeal on behalf of his wife, Mary E. Onwuasoanya has not moved in this court for leave to proceed IFP on appeal or filed an affidavit in support of such motion. See 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(1) (the court may grant leave to proceed IFP to “a person” who submits an appropriate affidavit).
IFP DENIED; APPEAL DISMISSED; SANCTION WARNING ISSUED.
#### § 404.939 Objections to the issues.

If you object to the issues to be decided at the hearing, you must notify the administrative law judge in writing at the earliest possible opportunity, but no later than 5 business days before the date set for the hearing, unless you show that your circumstances meet the conditions described in § 404.935(b). You must state the reason(s) for your objection(s). The administrative law judge will make a decision on your objection(s) either at the hearing or in writing before the hearing.

[81 FR 90993, Dec. 16, 2016]
Exhibit 23.1

Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

The
Board of Directors
Guaranty Bancorp

We
consent to the incorporation by reference in the registration statements on Form S-8 (No. 333-127456) and Form S-8
(No. 333-134950) of Guaranty Bancorp of our report dated February 12, 2009, with respect to the consolidated financial statements of Guaranty Bancorp and the effectiveness of
internal control over financial reporting, which report appears in this Annual Report on Form 10-K of Guaranty Bancorp for the year ended December 31, 2008.

/s/ Crowe Horwath LLP


Sherman
Oaks, California
February 12, 2009

---



QuickLinks
§ 404.1750 Notice of charges against a representative. ( a ) The General Counsel or other delegated official will prepare a notice containing a statement of charges that constitutes the basis for the proceeding against the representative.
( b ) We will send this notice to the representative either by certified or registered mail, to his or her last known address, or by personal delivery.
( c ) We will advise the representative to file an answer, within 14 business days from the date of the notice, or from the date the notice was delivered personally, stating why he or she should not be suspended or disqualified from acting as a representative in dealings with us.
( d ) The General Counsel or other delegated official may extend the 14-day period specified in paragraph (c) of this section for good cause, in accordance with § 404.911.
( e ) The representative must— ( 1 ) Answer the notice in writing under oath (or affirmation); and
( 2 ) File the answer with the Social Security Administration, at the address specified on the notice, within the 14-day time period specified in paragraph (c) of this section.
( f ) If the representative does not file an answer within the 14-day time period specified in paragraph (c) of this section (or the period extended in accordance with paragraph (d) of this section), he or she does not have the right to present evidence, except as may be provided in § 404.1765(g).
[45 FR 52090, Aug. 5, 1980, as amended at 56 FR 24131, May 29, 1991; 62 FR 38452, July 18, 1997; 63 FR 41417, Aug. 4, 1998; 71 FR 2876, Jan. 18, 2006; 76 FR 80246, Dec. 23, 2011; 83 FR 30855, July 2, 2018]
#### In the Matter of A. R. Haskell et al., Respondents, against Howard J. Fisk et al., Constituting the Town Board of the Town of Ellicott, Appellants.

Motion for leave to appeal to the Court of Appeals denied. Present — Taylor, P. J., MeCurn, Love, Vaughan and Kimball, JJ. [See *ante,*p. 153.]
Exhibit 3.19
 RESTATED CERTIFICATE OF INCORPORATION
OF
EDELMAN SHOE, INC.




---



#####
#### § 255.6 Recovery by setoff.

An overpayment may be recovered by setoff from any subsequent payment determined to be payable under any statute administered by the Board to the individual who received the overpayment. An overpayment may be recovered from someone other than the overpaid individual by setoff from a subsequent payment determined to be payable to that other individual on the basis of the same record of compensation as that of the overpaid individual.
### **CHAPTER 53A—DISPOSITION OF PERSONAL PROPERTY ABROAD**

Sec.
4341.
Definitions.
4342.
Limitations on disposition of personal property.
4343.
Regulations.
Exhibit 32.1  CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002  In connection with the Quarterly Report of ALCO, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2009 (the "Report"), I, Andrew Liu, Chief Executive Officer and Chairman of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:  1) The Report fully complies with the requirement of Section 13(a) or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and  2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the Company's financial position and results of operations.      By: /s/ Andrew Liu, CEO and Chairman  Date:August 14, 2009
<TABLE>

Exhibit 11 -- Statement Re: Computation of Per-Share Earnings
<CAPTION>
                                         Three months ended   Six months ended
                                             February 28,        February 28,
                                            1997      1996      1997      1996  
                                         --------- --------- --------- ---------
<S>                                      <C>       <C>       <C>       <C>
Primary

 Average shares outstanding              1,572,894 1,563,420 1,567,659 1,562,922
 Net effect of dilutive stock
   options - based on the
   treasury stock method using
   average market price                    145,437   169,070   150,956   166,404
                                         --------- --------- --------- ---------
 Total                                   1,718,331 1,732,490 1,718,615 1,729,326
                                         ========= ========= ========= =========
 Net income                               $237,336  $156,229  $433,153  $246,831
                                          ========  ========  ========  ========
 Per-share amount                            $0.14     $0.09     $0.25     $0.14
                                             =====     =====     =====     =====
Fully Diluted

 Average shares outstanding              1,572,894 1,563,420 1,567,659 1,562,922
 Net effect of dilutive stock
   options - based on the
   treasury stock method using
   the quarter end market price,
   if higher than average
   market price                            145,437   169,070   150,956   171,968
                                         --------- --------- --------- ---------
 Total                                   1,718,331 1,732,490 1,718,615 1,734,890
                                         ========= ========= ========= =========
 Net income                               $237,336  $156,229  $433,153  $246,831
                                          ========  ========  ========  ========
 Per-share amount                            $0.14     $0.09     $0.25     $0.14
                                             =====     =====     =====     =====
</TABLE>
### §§15o to 15q. Repealed. Pub. L. 90–576, title I, §103, Oct. 16, 1968, 82 Stat. 1091

Section 15o, acts June 8, 1936, ch. 541, §7, 49 Stat. 1490; Aug. 1, 1946, ch. 725, title I, §101, 60 Stat. 777; Aug. 2, 1956, ch. 871, title III, §301, 70 Stat. 925, made the Smith-Hughes Vocational Education Act applicable to the development of vocational education.

Section 15p, acts June 8, 1936, ch. 541, §8, 49 Stat. 1490; Aug. 1, 1946, ch. 725, title I, §101, 60 Stat. 777; Aug. 2, 1956, ch. 871, title III, §301, 70 Stat. 925, required that industrial-plant training be bona-fide vocational training and that no more than 10 percent be used for the purchase or acquisition of equipment.

Section 15q, act June 8, 1936, ch. 541, §9, as added Aug. 1, 1946, ch. 725, title I, §101, 60 Stat. 777; amended Reorg. Plan No. 1 of 1953, §§5, 8, eff. Apr. 11, 1953, 18 F.R. 2053, 67 Stat. 631; Aug. 2, 1956, ch. 871, title III, §301, 70 Stat. 925, authorized appropriations for Office of Education.

For general subject matter of sections 15o to 15q, see section 1241 et seq. of this title.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date of Repeal

Pub. L. 90–576, title I, §103, Oct. 16, 1968, 82 Stat. 1091, provided that the repeal is effective July 1, 1969.
### **CHAPTER 17—RELIEF AID TO WAR-DEVASTATED COUNTRIES**
### §§1591 to 1594. Repealed. Aug. 26, 1954, ch. 937, title V, §542(a)(5), 68 Stat. 861

Section 1591, acts Oct. 6, 1949, ch. 626, title I, §101, 63 Stat. 715; July 26, 1950, ch. 491, §1, 64 Stat. 373, related to form of assistance and agreements concerning use.

Section 1592, acts Oct. 6, 1949, ch. 626, title I, §102, 63 Stat. 715; July 26, 1950, ch. 491, §2, 64 Stat. 374, related to appropriations.

Section 1593, act Oct. 6, 1949, ch. 626, title I, §103, 63 Stat. 715, related to additional contract authorizations.

Section 1594, acts Oct. 6, 1949, ch. 626, title I, §104, 63 Stat. 715; July 26, 1950, ch. 491, §3, 64 Stat. 374, related to limitation on use of funds.

See section 2151 et seq. of this title.
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 98-6971
CALVIN SCOTT WEDINGTON, Petitioner - Appellant, versus KATHLEEN HAWK, Respondent - Appellee.Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Malcolm J. Howard, District Judge. (CA-98-50-5-H) Submitted: April 15, 1999 Decided: April 21, 1999 Before NIEMEYER and HAMILTON, Circuit Judges, and PHILLIPS, Senior Circuit Judge. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Calvin Scott Wedington, Appellant Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: Calvin Scott Wedington appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (1994) petition. We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See Wedington v. Hawk , No. CA-98-50-5-H (E.D.N.C. June 8, 1998). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
# In the United States Court of Federal Claims

OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS

No. 16- 0217 V

Filed: June 30, 2016 Unpublished

* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *

SANDRA RETZLAFF , *

*
Petitioner, * Ruling on Entitlement; Concession;

* Influenza (“Flu”) Vaccine ; Shoulder

v. * Injury Related to Vaccine Administration

* (“SIRVA”); Special Processing Unit

SECRETARY OF HEALTH * (“SPU”) AND HUMAN SERVICES, *

* Respondent. *

*

* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * Jeffrey S. Pop, Attorney at Law, Beverly Hills, CA, f or petitioner.

Traci R. Patton , U .S. Department of Justice, Washington, DC, for respondent.

RULING ON ENTITLEMENT 1

Dorsey

, Chief Special Master:

On February 12, 2016

, Sandra Retzlaff (“p etitioner ”) filed a petition for compensation under the National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program, 42 U.S.C. §300aa

- 10, et seq

. , 2 (the “Vaccine Act” or “Program”)

. Peti tioner alleges that as a result of an influenza (“flu”) vaccination on November 14, 2013, she suffered a shoulder injury related to vaccine administration (“SIRVA”). Pet

. at 1. The case was assigned to the Special Processing Unit (“SPU”) of the Office of Special Masters.

On June 29, 2016

, respondent filed her Rule 4(c) R eport in which she concedes that petitioner is entitled to compensation in this case. Rule 4(c) Rep

. at 1 . Specifically, respondent stated that the evidence establishes that petitioner’s injury is consistent with SIRVA, and that the injury was caused in fact by her flu vaccination on November 14,

1 Because this unpublished ruling contains a reasoned explanation for the action in this case, the undersigned intends to post it on the United States Court of Federal Claims' website, in accordance wi th

the E

- Government Act of 2002

. 44 U.S.C. § 3501 note (2012)(Federal Management and Promotion of Electronic Government Services). In accordance with Vaccine Rule 18(b), petitioner has 14 days to identify and move to redact medical or other information, the disclosure of which would constitute an unwarranted invasion of privacy. If, upon review, the undersigned agrees that the ident ified material fits within this definition, the undersigned will redact such material from public access.

2 National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act of 1986, Pub. L. No. 99

- 660, 100 Stat. 3755. Hereinafter, for ease of citation, all “§” references to the Vaccine Act will be to the pertinent subparagraph of 42 U.S.C. § 300aa (2012).2 2013

. Id. at 4 -5

. Respondent further stated that petitioner met all statutory and jurisdictional requirements, including having suffered the condition for more than six

months. Id. at 5

. Thus, respondent concludes that entitlement to compensation is appropriate under the terms of the Vaccine Act. Id.

In view of respondent’s concession and the evidence of record

, the undersigned find s that petitioner is entitle d to compensation

.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

s/Nora Beth Dorsey Nora Beth Dorsey Chief Special Master
Exhibit 12.2
 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 302
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 (18 U.S.C. §1350)
  1.
    
    I have reviewed this annual report on Form 20-F of Adecoagro S.A.;2.
    
    Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact
necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances
under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to
the period covered by this report;3.
    
    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material
respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows
of the company as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;4.
    
    The companys other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as
defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the company
and have:
 (a)
    
    Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our
supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the
company, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us
by others within those entities, particularly during the period in
which this report is being prepared;(b)
    
    [intentionally omitted];(c)
    
    Evaluated the effectiveness of the companys disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the
effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end
of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and(d)
    
    Disclosed in this report any change in the companys internal control
over financial reporting that occurred during the period covered by
the annual report that has materially affected, or is reasonably
likely to materially affect, the companys internal control over
financial reporting; and
 5.
    
    The companys other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based
on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial
reporting, to the companys auditors and the audit committee of the
companys board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
functions):
 (a)
    
    All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
operation of internal control over financial reporting which are
reasonably likely to adversely affect the companys ability to record,
process, summarize and report financial information; and(b)
    
    Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the companys internal
control over financial reporting.
  /s/ Carlos A. Boero HughesCarlos A. Boero HughesChief Financial Officer
§ 404.1014 Domestic service by a student for a local college club, fraternity or sorority. ( a ) *General.* If you are a student and do work of a household nature in or about the club rooms or house of a local college club or local chapter of a college fraternity or sorority, and are enrolled and regularly attending classes at a school, college, or university, your work is not covered as employment.
( b ) *Explanation of terms* — ( 1 ) *Work of a household nature* means the type of work done by cooks, waiters, butlers, maids, janitors, laundresses, furnacemen, handymen, gardeners, housekeepers and housemothers.
( 2 ) A *local college club or local chapter of a college fraternity or sorority* does not include an alumni club or chapter. Also, if the club rooms or house are used mostly for supplying board or lodging to students or nonstudents as a business, the work done is not excluded by this section.
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,  AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of ALCO, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ended June 30, 2007 (the "Report"), I, Andrew Liu, Chief Executive Officer and Chairman of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

> 1) The Report fully complies with the requirement of Section 13(a) or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange
> Act of 1934; and
> 
> 
> 2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the Company's
> financial position and results of operations.

/s/Andrew Liu



Andrew Liu, Chief Executive Officer and Chairman

August 14, 2007
### §10504. Imposition of sanctions under Global Magnitsky Human Rights Accountability Act

#### (a) In general

The Secretary of State, in consultation with the Secretary of the Treasury, should evaluate whether there are foreign persons engaged in significant corruption for the purposes of potential imposition of sanctions under the Global Magnitsky Human Rights Accountability Act (subtitle F of title XII of Public Law 114–328; 22 U.S.C. 10101 et seq.)—

(1) in all countries identified pursuant to section 10502(b) of this title; and

(2) in relation to the planning or construction or any operation of the Nord Stream 2 pipeline.

#### (b) Report required

Not later than 180 days after providing the list required by section 10502(b) of this title, and annually thereafter, the Secretary of State shall submit to the appropriate congressional committees a report that includes—

(1) a list of foreign persons with respect to which the President imposed sanctions pursuant to the evaluation under subsection (a);

(2) the dates on which such sanctions were imposed;

(3) the reasons for imposing such sanctions; and

(4) a list of all foreign persons that have engaged in significant corruption in relation to the planning, construction, or operation of the Nord Stream 2 pipeline.

#### (c) Form of report

Each report required by subsection (b) shall be submitted in unclassified form but may include a classified annex.

#### (d) Briefing in lieu of report

The Secretary of State, in consultation with the Secretary of the Treasury, may, instead of submitting a written report required under subsection (b) (except with respect to the list required by subsection (b)(4)), provide to the appropriate congressional committees a briefing, together with a written justification, if doing so would better serve the national interests of the United States.

#### (e) Termination of requirements relating to Nord Stream 2

The requirements under subsections (a)(2) and (b)(4) shall terminate on the date that is 5 years after December 22, 2023.

(Pub. L. 118–31, div. E, title LIV, §5405, Dec. 22, 2023, 137 Stat. 947.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

The Global Magnitsky Human Rights Accountability Act, referred to in subsec. (a), is subtitle F (§§1261–1264) of title XII of div. A of Pub. L. 114–328, Dec. 23, 2016, 130 Stat. 2533, which is classified generally to chapter 108 (§10101 et seq.) of this title. For complete classification of this Act to the Code, see Short Title note set out under section 10101 of this title and Tables.
§ 30.404 Will OWCP pay for transportation to obtain medical treatment? ( a ) The employee is entitled to reimbursement for reasonable and necessary expenses, including transportation, incident to obtaining authorized medical services, appliances or supplies. To determine what is a reasonable distance to travel, OWCP will consider the availability of services, the employee's condition, and the means of transportation. Generally, a roundtrip distance of up to 200 miles is considered a reasonable distance to travel.
( b ) If travel of more than 200 miles is contemplated, or air transportation or overnight accommodations will be needed, the employee must submit a written request to OWCP for prior authorization with information describing the circumstances and necessity for such travel expenses. OWCP will approve the request if it determines that the travel expenses are reasonable and necessary, and are incident to obtaining authorized medical services, appliances or supplies. Requests for travel expenses that are often approved include those resulting from referrals to a specialist for further medical treatment, and those involving air transportation of an employee who lives in a remote geographical area with limited local medical services.
( c ) If a claimant disagrees with the decision of OWCP that requested travel expenses are either not reasonable or necessary, or are not incident to obtaining authorized medical services, appliances or supplies, he or she may utilize the adjudicatory process described in subpart D of this part.
( d ) The standard form designated for medical travel refund requests is Form OWCP-957 and must be used to seek reimbursement under this section. This form can be obtained from OWCP.