alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Justice

###### Drug Enforcement Administration

          - [Docket No. 10-36]

# ACTION:

Correction.

                    On Thursday, April 7, 2011, the Drug Enforcement Administration published the above-titled Decision and Order, as well as the Decision of the Administrative Law Judge (76 FR 19386). In preparing the document for publication, the files were merged resulting in the footnotes of the Administrative Law Judge's Decision                           ( print page 21407)                        being numbered sequentially to follow the footnote numbers of the Decision and Order rather than beginning with the number 1 as they did in the ALJ's slip opinion.                

Therefore, this notice corrects footnotes 12 through 67 appearing in the Decision signed by the U.S. Administrative Law Judge to be footnotes 1 through 56 beginning at 76 FR 19390 under the first column.

Dated: April 8, 2011.

Michele M. Leonhart,

Administrator.

[FR Doc. 2011-9171 Filed 4-14-11; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4410-09-P
#### In the Matter of the Claim of Roy Horton. Swift & Company, Inc., Appellant; Michael J. Murphy, as Acting Industrial Commissioner, Respondent.

All concur.
### §§1601 to 1604. Repealed. Aug. 26, 1954, ch. 937, title V, §542(a)(5), 68 Stat. 861

Section 1601, acts Oct. 6, 1949, ch. 626, title II, §201, 63 Stat. 716; July 26, 1950, ch. 491, §5, 64 Stat. 375, related to appropriations for Greece, Turkey, and Iran.

Section 1602, acts Oct. 6, 1949, ch. 626, title III, §301, 63 Stat. 716; July 26, 1950, ch. 491, §6, 64 Stat. 375, related to military assistance to Republics of Korea and Philippines.

Section 1603, acts Oct. 6, 1949, ch. 626, title III, §302, 63 Stat. 716; July 26, 1950, ch. 491, §7, 64 Stat. 375, related to appropriations for military assistance to Republics of Korea and Philippines.

Section 1604, acts Oct. 6, 1949, ch. 626, title III, §303, 63 Stat. 716; July 26, 1950, ch. 491, §8, 64 Stat. 375, related to appropriations for general area of China.

See section 2151 et seq. of this title.
# C_2012120EN.01000101.xml

| 25.4.2012 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 120/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

25.4.2012

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 120/1

---

Authorisation for State aid pursuant to Articles 107 and 108 of the TFEU

Cases where the Commission raises no objections

(Text with EEA relevance, except for products falling under Annex I to the Treaty)

2012/C 120/01

| Date of adoption of the decision | 16.3.2012 |
| --- | --- |
| Reference number of State Aid | SA.33976 (11/N) |
| Member State | Denmark |
| Region | — | — |
| Title (and/or name of the beneficiary) | Støtte til offentlig skovrejsning |
| Legal basis | Lov om skove (LBK. nr. 945 af 24. september 2009)
  Det Nationale Skovprogram |
| Type of measure | Scheme | — |
| Objective | Environmental protection, Forestry |
| Form of aid | Direct grant |
| Budget | Overall budget: DKK 24 (in millions) |
| Intensity | 100 % |
| Duration (period) | Until 31.12.2013 |
| Economic sectors | Silviculture and other forestry activities |
| Name and address of the granting authority | Naturstyrelsen |
| Haraldsgade 53 |
| 2100 København Ø |
| DANMARK |

Date of adoption of the decision

16.3.2012

Reference number of State Aid

SA.33976 (11/N)

Member State

Denmark

Region

—

—

Title (and/or name of the beneficiary)

Støtte til offentlig skovrejsning

Legal basis

Lov om skove (LBK. nr. 945 af 24. september 2009)

Det Nationale Skovprogram

Type of measure

Scheme

—

Objective

Environmental protection, Forestry

Form of aid

Direct grant

Budget

Overall budget: DKK 24 (in millions)

Intensity

100 %

Duration (period)

Until 31.12.2013

Economic sectors

Silviculture and other forestry activities

Name and address of the granting authority

Naturstyrelsen

Haraldsgade 53

2100 København Ø

DANMARK

Other information

—

The authentic text(s) of the decision, from which all confidential information has been removed, can be found at:

http://ec.europa.eu/community_law/state_aids/state_aids_texts_en.htm

---
§ 30.725 What are the effects of non-automatic exclusion? ( a ) OWCP shall give notice of the exclusion of a physician, hospital or provider of medical services or supplies to: ( 1 ) All OWCP district offices;
( 2 ) CMS;
( 3 ) All employees who are known to have had treatment, services or supplies from the excluded provider within the six-month period immediately preceding the order of exclusion; and
( 4 ) The state or local authority responsible for licensing or certifying the excluded provider.
( b ) Notwithstanding any exclusion of a physician, hospital, or provider of medical services or supplies under this subpart, OWCP shall not refuse an employee reimbursement for any otherwise reimbursable medical treatment, service or supply if: ( 1 ) Such treatment, service or supply was rendered in an emergency by an excluded physician; or
( 2 ) The employee could not reasonably have been expected to know of such exclusion.
( c ) An employee who is notified that his or her attending physician has been excluded shall have a new right to select a qualified physician.
[71 FR 78534, Dec. 29, 2006, as amended at 84 FR 3059, Feb. 8, 2019]
**Exhibit 32**

** **

**Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, As AdoptedPursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**

 

In connection with the Drayton Richdale Corporation (the “Company”)Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2011 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission onthe date hereof (the “Report”), I, Antonio Arnel Maquera, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certifypursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to thebest of my knowledge:

 

(1). The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

 

(2). The information contained in the Report fairly presents, inall material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

Date: June 30, 2011

CONFIDENTIAL
Editorial Note on Part 416
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 416 appear at 68 FR 53509, Sept. 11, 2003.

§ 416.1488 Conditions for reopening. A determination, revised determination, decision, or revised decision may be reopened— ( a ) Within 12 months of the date of the notice of the initial determination, for any reason;
( b ) Within two years of the date of the notice of the initial determination if we find good cause, as defined in § 416.1489, to reopen the case; or
( c ) At any time if it was obtained by fraud or similar fault. In determining whether a determination or decision was obtained by fraud or similar fault, we will take into account any physical, mental, educational, or linguistic limitations (including any lack of facility with the English language) which you may have had at the time.
[45 FR 52096, Aug. 5, 1980, as amended at 59 FR 1637, Jan. 12, 1994]
#### § 212.1 General.

In determining an individual's entitlement and amount of benefits under the Railroad Retirement Act, an individual's military service creditable under the Railroad Retirement Act is used. This part defines military service as used under this Act and sets forth the criteria to determine the creditability of military service.
#### § 217.27 Effect of cancellation.

When a person cancels an application the effect is the same as though an application was never filed. When an employee cancels his or her application, any application filed by the employee's spouse is also cancelled. However, a request to cancel a survivor's application will cancel only the application of the survivor named in the written request. A person who cancels an application may reapply by filing a new application under this part.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

DAY HIGH

 138

 120

 121

 120

 115

 103

 97

 106

 100

 95

 93

 93

 93

 102

 91

 92

 94

 94

 97

 72

 69

 69

 67

 68

 70

 67

 67

 69

 69

 69

 117

 114

 113

 113

 100

 92

 86

 86

 92

 92

 90

 89

 89

 89

 88

 87

 87

 89

 67

 67

 67

 66

 65

 67

 67

 65

 65

 66

 67

 67

 124

 117

 117

 116

 110

 95

 91

 91

 93

 93

 91

 91

 91

 93

 90

 90

 89

 91

 82

 69

 68

 68

 67

 67

 67

 66

 66

 67

 68

 68

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

APRIL 2001 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: May 10, 2001

HIGH LOW MEAN

 64.9

 62.6

 59.5

 59.3

 59.8

 58.5

 56.6

 56.3

 58.0

 58.9

 58.3

 58.4

 59.3

 60.0

 61.4

 62.0

 62.5

 62.4

 61.0

 56.0

 55.8

 57.8

 58.9

 60.0

 60.9

 60.9

 60.1

 59.5

 59.0

 60.6

 61.7

 59.0

 56.0

 55.8

 56.3

 56.2

 54.9

 53.1

 54.1

 54.2

 56.4

 54.2

 55.7

 55.9

 56.8

 58.4

 58.8

 59.2

 56.2

 54.4

 53.7

 54.6

 56.3

 57.3

 58.4

 58.5

 57.7

 57.5

 56.3

 57.4

 63.4

 60.4

 58.0

 57.6

 58.0

 56.9

 55.9

 54.9

 56.0

 56.5

 57.2

 56.3

 57.5

 58.0

 59.0

 60.2

 60.7

 60.8

 59.2

 55.0

 54.6

 56.1

 57.5

 58.5

 59.5

 59.7

 59.0

 58.5

 57.7

 59.0

HIGH LOW MEAN

 9.0

 9.3

 9.6

 9.6

 9.9

 9.7

 9.6

 9.8

 9.7

 9.4

 8.9

 9.3

 8.9

 8.7

 8.4

 7.9

 7.5

 0.0

 10.3

 10.3

 10.4

 10.5

 10.3

 10.1

 10.0

 9.8

 9.8

 9.8

 9.9

 9.8

 8.2

 8.6

 9.0

 9.1

 9.2

 9.3

 9.3

 9.4

 9.2

 8.9

 8.6

 8.7

 8.5

 8.3

 7.9

 7.4

 7.0

 0.0

 9.5

 10.0

 10.2

 10.1

 10.0

 9.8

 9.7

 9.6

 9.6

 9.6

 9.7

 9.5

 8.6

 8.9

 9.3

 9.3

 9.5

 9.5

 9.5

 9.6

 9.4

 9.2

 8.7

 8.9

 8.8

 8.5

 8.2

 7.7

 7.3

 0.0

 9.7

 10.1

 10.3

 10.3

 10.2

 10.0

 9.8

 9.7

 9.7

 9.7

 9.8

 9.6

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

RIPON ON THE STANISLAUS RIVER

 ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS WATER TEMPERATURE, DEG DISSOLVED OXYZEN, PPM
#### § 404.317 How is the amount of my disability benefit calculated?

Your monthly benefit is equal to the primary insurance amount (PIA). This amount is computed under the rules in subpart C of this part as if it was an old-age benefit, and as if you were 62 years of age at the beginning of the 5-month waiting period mentioned in § 404.315(a). If the 5-month waiting period is not required because of your previous entitlement, your PIA is figured as if you were 62 years old when you become entitled to benefits this time. If the 5-month waiting period is not required because you have been medically determined to have amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (see § 404.315), your PIA is figured as if you were 62 years old when you become entitled to benefits. Your monthly benefit amount may be reduced if you receive workers' compensation or public disability payments before you attain full retirement age (as defined in § 404.409) (see § 404.408). Your benefits may also be reduced if you were entitled to other retirement-age benefits before you attained full retirement age (as defined in § 404.409).

[68 FR 4704, Jan. 30, 2003, as amended at 81 FR 10033, Apr. 4, 2016; 86 FR 48021, Aug. 27, 2021]
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION OF

CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

OF QUINTANA MARITIME LIMITED

PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. § 1350

In connection with the accompanying report on Form 10-K for the year ended
December 31, 2007 filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Paul J. Cornell, Chief Financial Officer of Quintana Maritime Limited (the Company), hereby certify, to my
knowledge, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | 1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | -- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



By:

/s/ Paul J. CornellPaul J. CornellChief Financial Officer (Principal Financial Officer)


Date: February 29, 2008
### §971. Agreements to indemnify against loss or damage

#### (a) Authorization of Federal Council on the Arts and Humanities

The Federal Council on the Arts and Humanities (hereinafter in this chapter referred to as the "Council"), established under section 958 of this title, is authorized to make agreements to indemnify against loss or damage such items as may be eligible for such indemnity agreements under section 972 of this title—

(1) in accordance with the provisions of this chapter; and

(2) on such terms and conditions as the Council shall prescribe, by regulation, in order to achieve the purposes of this chapter and, consistent with such purposes, to protect the financial interest of the United States.

#### (b) Council as "agency"

(1) For purposes of this chapter, the Council shall be an "agency" within the meaning of the appropriate definitions of such term in title 5.

(2) For purposes of this chapter, the Secretary of the Smithsonian Institution, the Director of the National Gallery of Art, the member designated by the Chairman of the Senate Commission of Art and Antiquities and the member designated by the Speaker of the House of Representatives shall not serve as members of the Council.

(Pub. L. 94–158, §2, Dec. 20, 1975, 89 Stat. 844; Pub. L. 99–194, title III, §301, Dec. 20, 1985, 99 Stat. 1345.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

1985—Subsec. (b). Pub. L. 99–194 designated existing provisions as par. (1) and added par. (2).

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date

Pub. L. 94–158, §9, Dec. 20, 1975, 89 Stat. 846, provided that: "This Act [see Short Title note below] shall become effective 30 days after the date of the enactment of this Act [Dec. 20, 1975]."

#### Short Title

Pub. L. 94–158, §1, Dec. 20, 1975, 89 Stat. 844, provided that: "This Act [enacting this chapter and provisions set out as a note under this section] may be cited as the 'Arts and Artifacts Indemnity Act'."
### §3419. Institute of Education Sciences

There shall be in the Department of Education the Institute of Education Sciences, which shall be administered in accordance with the Education Sciences Reform Act of 2002 [20 U.S.C. 9501 et seq.] by the Director appointed under section 114(a) of that Act [20 U.S.C. 9514(a)].

(Pub. L. 96–88, title II, §208, as added Pub. L. 107–279, title IV, §402(2), Nov. 5, 2002, 116 Stat. 1985.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

The Education Sciences Reform Act of 2002, referred to in text, is title I of Pub. L. 107–279, Nov. 5, 2002, 116 Stat. 1941, which is classified generally to subchapter I (§9501 et seq.) of chapter 76 of this title. For complete classification of this Act to the Code, see Short Title note set out under section 9501 of this title and Tables.

#### Prior Provisions

A prior section 3419, Pub. L. 96–88, title II, §208, formerly §209, Oct. 17, 1979, 93 Stat. 674; Pub. L. 103–227, title IX, §911(b), Mar. 31, 1994, 108 Stat. 213; renumbered §208, Pub. L. 103–382, title II, §271(a)(2), Oct. 20, 1994, 108 Stat. 3929, related to Office of Educational Research and Improvement, prior to repeal by Pub. L. 107–279, title IV, §402(2), Nov. 5, 2002, 116 Stat. 1985.

A prior section 208 of Pub. L. 96–88 was classified to section 3418 of this title prior to repeal by Pub. L. 99–145.
## State of N ew York Su p reme Cou rt, A p p ellate Division Third J u dicial Dep artment Decided and Entered: March 26, 2015 516905

________________________________ In the Matter of CAMILLO DOUGLAS, Petitioner, v MEMORANDUM AND JUDGMENT BRIAN FISCHER, as Commissioner of Corrections and Community Supervision, Respondent.

________________________________ Calendar Date: February 11, 2015 Before: McCarthy, J.P., Egan Jr., Devine and Clark, JJ.

__________ Jillian S. Harrington, Monroe Township, New Jersey, for petitioner. Eric T. Schneiderman, Attorney General, Albany (Kathleen M. Treasure of counsel), for respondent.

__________ McCarthy, J.P. Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 (transferred to this Court by order of the Supreme Court, entered in Albany County) to review a determination of respondent which found petitioner guilty of violating certain prison disciplinary rules. Petitioner was suspected of possessing a weapon and was ordered to submit to a pat frisk. During the course of the frisk, he kicked the correction officer who was conducting it and attempted to flee the area. In the course of doing so, he ran into another officer and knocked him to the floor. A physical altercation then ensued between petitioner and a number of-2- 516905

officers during which petitioner began yelling obscenities. He was ultimately subdued and removed from the area. As a result of this incident, petitioner was charged in a misbehavior report with assaulting staff, engaging in violent conduct, creating a disturbance and failing to comply with frisk procedures. He was found guilty of the charges following a tier III disciplinary hearing and the determination was later affirmed on administrative appeal. This CPLR article 78 proceeding ensued. We confirm. The misbehavior report, related documentation and testimony of correction officers involved in the incident provide substantial evidence supporting the determination of guilt (see Matter of Alsaifullah v Fischer, 118 AD3d 1239, 1240 [2014], lv denied 24 NY3d 906 [2014]; Matter of Walker v Fischer, 108 AD3d 999, 1000 [2013]). Any inconsistencies in the testimony and petitioner's protestations of innocence presented credibility issues for the Hearing Officer to resolve (see Matter of Rouse v Fischer, 94 AD3d 1310, 1310 [2012]; Matter of Crenshaw v Fischer, 89 AD3d 1343, 1344 [2011]). Furthermore, we reject petitioner's assertion that the Hearing Officer improperly relied upon confidential information. Although confidential information led to the pat frisk, it did not provide a basis for the determination of petitioner's guilt (see Matter of Horne v Fischer, 98 AD3d 788, 789 [2012]; Matter of Mullady v Bezio, 87 AD3d 765, 766 [2011]). We have considered petitioner's remaining contentions and find that they are either unpreserved for our review or are lacking in merit. Egan Jr., Devine and Clark, JJ., concur.-3- 516905

ADJUDGED that the determination is confirmed, without costs, and petition dismissed.

ENTER:

Robert D. Mayberger Clerk of the Court
### §262k–1. Transparency of budgets

#### (a) Limitation

Beginning three years after September 30, 1996, the Secretary of the Treasury shall instruct the United States Executive Director of each international financial institution to use the voice and vote of the United States to oppose any loan or other utilization of the funds of their respective institution, other than to address basic human needs, for the government of any country which the Secretary of the Treasury determines—

(1) does not have in place a functioning system for reporting to civilian authorities audits of receipts and expenditures that fund activities of the armed forces and security forces;

(2) has not provided to the institution information about the audit process requested by the institution.

#### (b) "International financial institution" defined

For purposes of this section, the term "international financial institution" shall include the institutions identified in section 532(b) of this Act.

(Pub. L. 104–208, div. A, title I, §101(c) [title V, §576], Sept. 30, 1996, 110 Stat. 3009–121, 3009–168; Pub. L. 105–118, title V, §572, Nov. 26, 1997, 111 Stat. 2430.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

Section 532(b) of this Act, referred to in subsec. (b), is section 532(b) of Pub. L. 104–208, div. A, title I, §101(c) [title V], Sept. 30, 1996, 110 Stat. 3009–121, 3009–152, which is not classified to the Code.

#### Amendments

1997—Subsec. (a)(1). Pub. L. 105–118, §572(a), amended par. (1) generally. Prior to amendment, par. (1) read as follows: "does not have in place a functioning system for a civilian audit of all receipts and expenditures that fund activities of the armed forces and security forces;".

Subsec. (a)(2). Pub. L. 105–118, §572(b), amended par. (2) generally. Prior to amendment, par. (2) read as follows: "has not provided a summary of a current audit to the institution."