alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Editorial Note on Part 416
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 416 appear at 68 FR 53509, Sept. 11, 2003.

§ 416.1413 Reconsideration procedures. If you request reconsideration, we will give you a chance to present your case. How you can present your case depends upon the issue involved and whether you are asking us to reconsider an initial determination on an application or an initial determination on a suspension, reduction or termination of benefits. The methods of reconsideration include the following: ( a ) *Case review.* We will give you and the other parties to the reconsideration an opportunity to review the evidence in our files and then to present oral and written evidence to us. We will then make a decision based on all of this evidence. The official who reviews the case will make the reconsidered determination.
( b ) *Informal conference.* In addition to following the procedures of a case review, an informal conference allows you and the other parties to the reconsideration an opportunity to present witnesses. A summary record of this proceeding will become part of the case record. The official who conducts the informal conference will make the reconsidered determination.
( c ) *Formal conference.* In addition to following the procedures of an informal conference, a formal conference allows you and the other parties to a reconsideration an opportunity to request us to subpoena adverse witnesses and relevant documents and to cross-examine adverse witnesses. A summary record of this proceeding will become a part of the case record. The official who conducts the formal conference will make the reconsidered determination.
( d ) *Disability hearing.* If you have been receiving supplemental security income benefits because you are blind or disabled and you request reconsideration of an initial or revised determination that, based on medical factors, you are not now blind or disabled, we will give you and the other parties to the reconsideration an opportunity for a disability hearing. (See §§ 416.1414 through 416.1418.)
[45 FR 52096, Aug. 5, 1980, as amended at 51 FR 305, Jan. 3, 1986]
<PAGE>   1
 
                                                                      EXHIBIT 11
 
                            THE PIONEER GROUP, INC.
 
                 COMPUTATION OF EARNINGS PER SHARE (UNAUDITED)
                (DOLLARS IN THOUSANDS EXCEPT PER SHARE AMOUNTS)
 
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                               THREE MONTHS ENDED             SIX MONTHS ENDED
                                                    JUNE 30,                      JUNE 30,
      COMPUTATION FOR CONSOLIDATED         --------------------------    --------------------------
           STATEMENT OF INCOME                1997           1996           1997           1996
-----------------------------------------  -----------    -----------    -----------    -----------
<S>                                        <C>            <C>            <C>            <C>
Net income(1)............................  $     4,975    $     3,520    $    12,284    $     8,634
                                           ===========    ===========    ===========    ===========
Shares
  Weighted average number of common
     shares outstanding..................   25,131,000     24,944,000     25,130,000     24,934,000
  Dilutive effect of stock options and
     restricted stock proceeds as common
     stock equivalents computed under the
     treasury stock method using the
     average price during the period.....      444,000        514,000        409,000        524,000
                                           -----------    -----------    -----------    -----------
Weighted average number of shares
  outstanding as adjusted(1).............   25,575,000     25,458,000     25,539,000     25,458,000
                                           ===========    ===========    ===========    ===========
Earnings per share(1)....................  $      0.19    $      0.14    $      0.48    $      0.34
                                           ===========    ===========    ===========    ===========
</TABLE>
 
---------------
 
(1) These amounts agree with the related amounts in the Consolidated Statement
of Income.
§ 404.1692 Protection of State employees. ( a ) *Hiring preference.* We will develop and initiate procedures to implement a plan to partially or completely assume the disability determination function from the State agency under § 404.1690 or § 404.1691, as appropriate. Except for the State agency's administrator, deputy administrator, or assistant administrator (or his equivalent), we will give employees of the State agency who are capable of performing duties in the disability determination function preference over any other persons in filling positions with us for which they are qualified. We may also give a preference in hiring to the State agency's administrator, deputy administrator, or assistant administrator (or his equivalent). We will establish a system for determining the hiring priority among the affected State agency employees in those instances where we are not hiring all of them.
( b ) *Determination by Secretary of Labor.* We will not assume responsibility for performing the disability determination function from a State until the Secretary of Labor determines that the State has made fair and equitable arrangements under applicable Federal, State and local law to protect the interests of employees who will be displaced from their employment because of the assumption and who we will not hire.
Editorial Note on Part 416
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 416 appear at 68 FR 53509, Sept. 11, 2003.

§ 416.2221 Validation reviews. ( a ) *General.* We will conduct a validation review of a sample of the claims for payment filed by each State VR agency. We will conduct some of these reviews on a prepayment basis and some on a postpayment basis. We may review a specific claim, a sample of the claims, or all the claims filed by any State VR agency, if we determine that such review is necessary to ensure compliance with the requirements of this subpart. For each claim selected for review, the State VR agency must submit such records of the VR services and costs for which payment has been requested or made under this subpart, or copies of such records, as we may require to ensure that the services and costs meet the requirements for payment. For claims for cases described in § 416.2201(a), a clear explanation or existing documentation which demonstrates how the service contributed to the individual's performance of a continuous 9-month period of SGA must be provided. For claims for cases described in § 416.2201(b) or (c), a clear explanation or existing documentation which demonstrates how the service was reasonably expected to motivate or assist the individual to return to or continue in SGA must be provided. If we find in any prepayment validation review that the scope or content of the information is inadequate, we will request additional information and will withhold payment until adequate information has been provided. The State VR agency shall permit us (including duly authorized representatives) access to, and the right to examine, any records relating to such services and costs. Any review performed under this section will not be considered an audit for purposes of this subpart.
( b ) *Purpose.* The primary purpose of these reviews is— ( 1 ) To ensure that the VR services and costs meet the requirements for payment under this subpart;
( 2 ) To assess the validity of our documentation requirements; and
( 3 ) To assess the need for additional validation reviews or additional documentation requirements for any State VR agency to ensure compliance with the requirements under this subpart.
( c ) *Determinations.* In any validation review, we will determine whether the VR services and costs meet the requirements for payment and determine the amount of payment. We will notify in writing the State VR agency of our determination. If we find in any postpayment validation review that more or less than the correct amount of payment was made for a claim, we will determine that an overpayment or underpayment has occurred and will notify the State VR agency that we will make the appropriate adjustment.
( d ) *Appeals.* If the State VR agency disagrees with our determination under this section, it may appeal that determination in accordance with § 416.2227. For purposes of this section, an appeal must be filed within 60 days after receiving the notice of our determination.
[59 FR 11920, Mar. 15, 1994, as amended at 62462, Dec. 4, 2018]
**UN PUBLISHED** 
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

**No. 10**  **- 691**  **1**

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA , Plaintiff

- Appellee ,
v. VICTOR WARDELL WRIGHT , Defendant

- Appellant
.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Distr ict of Maryland , at Greenbelt
. Deborah K. Chasanow , Chief District Judge. ( 8:06

- cr - 00038

- DKC

- 1; 8:08

- cv - 02830

- DKC )

Submitted : November 18, 2010 Decided: November 30, 2010

Before SHEDD and AGEE , Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Dismissed by un published per curiam opinion
. Victor Wardell Wright, Appellant Pro Se. Barbara Suzanne Skalla, Assistant United States Attorney, Greenbelt, Maryland, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM: Victor Wardell Wright seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. A. § 2255 ( West Supp. 2010 ) motion. The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1) (200 6 ). A certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (200 6 ). When the district court denies relief on the merits, a prisoner satisfies this stand ard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that the district court’s assessment of the constitutional claims is debatable or wrong. Slack v. McDaniel , 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000); see Miller

- El v. Cockrell , 537 U.S. 322, 336

- 38 (2003). When the district court denies relief on procedural grounds, the prisoner must demonstrate both that the dispositive procedural ruling is debatable, and that the motion states a debatable claim of the denial of a constitutional right. Slack , 529 U.S. at 484

- 85. We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Wright has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny Wright’s motion for a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and le gal contentions are adequately3 presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED
### §§1134 to 1143. Repealed. Pub. L. 92–255, title I, §104, Mar. 21, 1972, 86 Stat. 67

Section 1134, Pub. L. 92–255, title II, §224, Mar. 21, 1972, 86 Stat. 71, provided for establishment of research and development programs by Director.

Section 1135, Pub. L. 92–255, title II, §225, Mar. 21, 1972, 86 Stat. 72, provided for establishment of a single non-Federal share requirement.

Section 1136, Pub. L. 92–255, title II, §226, Mar. 21, 1972, 86 Stat. 72, provided for Director to make drug prevention function recommendations to President and to consult with responsible agencies with respect to drug prevention functions.

Section 1137, Pub. L. 92–255, title II, §227, Mar. 21, 1972, 86 Stat. 72, provided for resolution of agency conflicts with regard to drug prevention functions.

Section 1138, Pub. L. 92–255, title II, §228, Mar. 21, 1972, 86 Stat. 72, provided for communications and liaison with respect to drug prevention functions by one of Assistant Directors.

Section 1139, Pub. L. 92–255, title II, §229, Mar. 21, 1972, 86 Stat. 72, provided, with respect to drug prevention functions, coordination of State and local governments, availability of information and other services and activities.

Section 1140, Pub. L. 92–255, title II, §230, Mar. 21, 1972, 86 Stat. 73, provided for a management oversight review by a Federal officer.

Section 1141, Pub. L. 92–255, title II, §231, Mar. 21, 1972, 86 Stat. 73, provided for convening of a council of officials of Federal agencies responsible for drug prevention functions by Director.

Section 1142, Pub. L. 92–255, title II, §232, Mar. 21, 1972, 86 Stat. 73, provided for designation of the Director to represent Government in international negotiations related to drug prevention functions.

Section 1143, Pub. L. 92–255, title II, §233, Mar. 21, 1972, 86 Stat. 73, provided for an annual written report to the President by the Director.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date of Repeal

Section 1104 of this title, prior to repeal by Pub. L. 94–237, §4(c)(1), Mar. 19, 1976, 90 Stat. 244, provided for repeal of sections effective June 30, 1975.
#### § 402.135 Where to send a request.

You may send your request for a record to: The Deputy Executive Director for the Office of Public Disclosure, Office of the General Counsel, Social Security Administration, 6401 Security Boulevard, Baltimore, Maryland 21235.

[62 FR 4154, Jan. 29, 1997, as amended at 68 FR 60295, Oct. 22, 2003]
Exhibit 32.1


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                           18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS
                         ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906
                        OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

      Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss.1350, as adopted pursuant to ss.906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned officer of John Hancock Financial
Services, Inc. (the "Company"), hereby certifies, to his knowledge, that:

      (1)   the Company's quarterly report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended
            March 31, 2005, (the "Report") fully complies with the requirements
            of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      (2)   the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
            material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
            of the Company as of and for the periods presented in the Report.

Dated: May 10, 2005
                              /s/ JOHN D. DESPREZ, III
                              --------------------------
                              Name: John D. DesPrez, III
                              Title: President and Chief Executive Officer
**EXHIBIT 32.1**

 

CERTIFICATIONPURSUANT TO RULE 13a-14(b) OF THE EXCHANGE ACT AND 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,ASENACTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

 

Inconnection with the Quarterly Report of Intrusion Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-QSBfor the three and nine-month periods ending September 30, 2005 as filedwith the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”),I, G. Ward Paxton, Chief Executive Officer of the Company certify, pursuant to18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as enacted pursuant to Section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

(1)                                  The Report fully complies with therequirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2)                                  The information contained in the Reportfairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and resultsof operations of the Company.

 

 
| November 10,  2005 | /s/  G. Ward Paxton      |   |
|-------------------------|--------------------------|--------|
|                    | G.  Ward Paxton          |
|                    | Chief  Executive Officer |

 

----
### §868. Omitted

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section, Pub. L. 89–10, title V, §541, as added Pub. L. 91–230, title I, §143(a)(4)(D), Apr. 13, 1970, 84 Stat. 148; amended Pub. L. 95–112, §2(e)(4), Sept. 24, 1977, 91 Stat. 912, which provided for the establishment of a National Council on Quality in Education and State advisory councils, was omitted in the general revision of title V of the Elementary and Secondary Education Act of 1965, Pub. L. 89–10, title V, Apr. 11, 1965, 79 Stat. 47, by Pub. L. 95–561, title V, §501, Nov. 1, 1978, 92 Stat. 2240.

A prior section 868, Pub. L. 89–10, title V, §508, Apr. 11, 1965, 79 Stat. 54, which provided for administration of State plan, was repealed by Pub. L. 91–230, title I, §143(a)(4)(A), Apr. 13, 1970, 84 Stat. 142.

Provisions similar to those comprising subsecs. (a)(1), (2)(A), (E), and (a)(3) of this section were contained in section 510(a), (b), (d) of Pub. L. 89–10, title V, Apr. 11, 1965, 79 Stat. 54, which was classified to section 870(a), (b), (d) of this title, prior to repeal of section 870 and general amendment of title V by section 143(a)(4)(A) and (D) of Pub. L. 91–230, respectively.
[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 79 (Monday, April 25, 2011)]
[Notices]
[Pages 22944-22945]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2011-9735]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY

Office of Thrift Supervision


Superior Bank, Birmingham, AL; Notice of Appointment of Receiver

    Notice is hereby given that, pursuant to the authority contained in 
section

[[Page 22945]]

5(d)(2) of the Home Owners' Loan Act, The Office of Thrift Supervision 
has duly appointed the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation as sole 
Receiver for Superior Bank, Birmingham, Alabama, (OTS No. 18010) on 
April 15, 2011.

    Dated: April 18, 2011.

    By the Office of Thrift Supervision.
Sandra E. Evans,
Federal Register Liaison.
[FR Doc. 2011-9735 Filed 4-22-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6720-01-M
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

DAY HIGH

 26,531

 26,974

 27,748

 28,869

 30,719

 27,438

 30,357

 28,524

 28,197

 29,281

 28,323

 28,174

 22,251

 27,835

 25,744

 25,497

 27,070

 26,670

 28,231

 29,026

 30,377

 29,179

 28,376

 28,790

 27,803

 26,591

 24,953

 22,512

 24,972

 24,813

 15,926

 17,092

 14,476

 10,719

 17,520

 18,187

 18,163

 17,230

 17,605

 16,676

 15,442

 14,192

 8,486

 15,540

 12,773

 13,696

 16,047

 14,873

 14,858

 14,988

 14,535

 9,789

 13,688

 8,296

 13,039

 13,171

 11,130

 13,245

 13,900

 12,992

 21,641

 22,280

 21,499

 17,378

 24,000

 21,954

 23,446

 22,904

 22,953

 23,129

 20,940

 20,737

 15,217

 20,779

 19,853

 20,265

 20,330

 20,532

 20,226

 20,993

 21,158

 18,033

 20,413

 20,370

 20,899

 19,464

 19,341

 18,020

 18,810

 18,802

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

SEPTEMBER 2008 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: October 10, 2008

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

PORT CHICAGO BOTTOM IN SUISUN BAY
§ 422.445 May we bring a civil action against your employer for failure to comply with our administrative wage garnishment order? ( a ) We may bring a civil action against your employer for any amount that the employer fails to withhold from your disposable pay in accordance with § 422.435(d), (e) and (f). Your employer may also be liable for attorney fees, costs of the lawsuit and (in the court's discretion) punitive damages.
( b ) We will not file a civil action against your employer before we terminate collection action against you, unless earlier filing is necessary to avoid expiration of any applicable statute of limitations period. For purposes of this section, “terminate collection action” means that we have terminated collection action in accordance with the Federal Claims Collection Standards (31 CFR 903.3) or other applicable standards. In any event, we will consider that collection action has been terminated if we have not received any payments to satisfy the debt for a period of one year.
CENTRAL VALLEY OPERATIONS OFFICE

CHINOOK SALMON REPORT

March 2011

Note: Shaded area not verified with DFG data Preliminary Data - Subject to Change

Winter Run Chinook Salmon Estimated Loss (Incidental Take) Spring Run Chinook Salmon Estimated Loss (Incidental Take) 

Daily SWP Daily CVP Daily Combined Season Combined Daily SWP Daily CVP Daily Combined Season Combined Dail

Tagged* No Tag Tagged* No Tag Tagged* No Tag Tagged* No Tag Tagged No Tag Tagged No Tag Tagged No Tag Tagged No Tag In 

DATE Estimated Estimated Estimated Estimated Estimated Estimated Estimated Estimated Estimated Estimated Estimated Estimated Estimated Estimated Estimated Estimated

Loss Loss Loss Loss Loss Loss Loss Loss Loss Loss Loss Loss Loss Loss Loss Loss

1-Mar-11 48 75 0 9 48 84 1,321 2,312 0000 0 0 0 23 4,928 2-Mar-11 0 18 0 3 0 21 1,321 2,333 0000 0 0 0 23 5,935 3-Mar-11 0 72 0 22 0 94 1,321 2,427 0000 0 0 0 23 4,460 4-Mar-11 0 54 0 5 0 59 1,321 2,486 0000 0 0 0 23 4,461 5-Mar-11 0 18 0 3 0 21 1,321 2,507 0000 0 0 0 23 4,460 6-Mar-11 0 18 0 10 0 28 1,321 2,535 0000 0 0 0 23 4,461 7-Mar-11 0 184 0 16 0 200 1,321 2,735 0000 0 0 0 23 3,918 8-Mar-11 4 35 5 8 9 43 1,330 2,778 0000 0 0 0 23 3,735 9-Mar-11 36 27 3 9 39 36 1,369 2,814 0002 0 2 0 25 3,640 

10-Mar-11 0 54 0 8 0 62 1,369 2,876 0005 0 5 0 30 3,360 11-Mar-11 0 108 5 16 5 124 1,374 3,000 0000 0 0 0 30 3,360 12-Mar-11 18 108 3 12 21 120 1,395 3,120 0002 0 2 0 32 3,360 13-Mar-11 0 54 2 21 2 75 1,397 3,195 0000 0 0 0 32 4,275 14-Mar-11 0 158 1 19 1 177 1,398 3,372 0007 0 7 0 39 3,908 15-Mar-11 22 27 3 20 25 47 1,423 3,419 0000 0 0 0 39 3,331 

16-Mar-11 0 90 0 9 0 99 1,423 3,518 0000 0 0 0 39 3,334 17-Mar-11 0 79 3 9 3 88 1,426 3,606 0 17 0 3 0 20 0 59 3,707 18-Mar-11 0 81 0 3 0 84 1,426 3,690 0005 0 5 0 64 3,363 19-Mar-11 0 36 6 29 6 65 1,432 3,755 0003 0 3 0 67 3,331 20-Mar-11 0 148 0 17 0 165 1,432 3,920 0 34 0 5 0 39 0 106 3,707 21-Mar-11 0 0 0 12 0 12 1,432 3,932 0 18 0 0 0 18 0 124 3,331 22-Mar-11 4 78 0 29 4 107 1,436 4,039 0 17 0 3 0 20 0 144 3,473 23-Mar-11 0 9 0 14 0 23 1,436 4,062 0 16 0 26 0 42 0 186 689 24-Mar-11 0000 0 0 1,436 4,062 0000 0 0 0 186 0 25-Mar-11 0000 0 0 1,436 4,062 0000 0 0 0 186 0 26-Mar-11 0000 0 0 1,436 4,062 0000 0 0 0 186 2,835 27-Mar-11 0 27 0 0 0 27 1,436 4,089 0 26 0 0 0 26 0 212 4,433 28-Mar-11 0 71 0 0 0 71 1,436 4,160 0 93 0 0 0 93 0 305 3,487 29-Mar-11 17 123 0 0 17 123 1,453 4,283 0 316 0 0 0 316 0 621 5,506 

30-Mar-11 0000 0 0 1,453 4,283 0 0 0 13 0 13 0 634 0 31-Mar-11 0 27 0 0 0 27 1,453 4,310 0 136 0 0 0 136 0 770 3,934 

Total 149 1,779 31 303 180 2,082 1,453 4,310 0 673 0 74 0 747 0 770 106,720 

Winter Run Incidental Take Levels (Oct 1 thru May 31) Spring Run Incidental Take Levels for Season Combined Total (Oct 1 thru Jun 30)

Banks T