alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 108 (Tuesday, June 5, 2012)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Page 33089]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2012-13583]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF STATE

22 CFR Parts 120, 123, 124, 126, 127, and 129

RIN 1400-AC95
[Public Notice 7913 ]

Announcement of Entry Into Force of the Defense Trade Cooperation 
Treaty Between the United States and the United Kingdom

ACTION: Final rule; announcement of effective date.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: On April 13, 2012, the United States and the United Kingdom 
exchanged diplomatic notes bringing the Treaty between the Government 
of the United States of America and the Government of the United 
Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland Concerning Defense Trade 
Cooperation (Treaty Doc. 110-7) into force. This document announces the 
entry into force of the Treaty and announces April 13, 2012, as the 
effective date of the rule published on March 21, 2012, implementing 
the Treaty and making other updates to the International Traffic in 
Arms Regulations (ITAR).

DATES: This document announces the entry into force of the Treaty and 
announces April 13, 2012 as the effective date of the rule published on 
March 21, 2012 (77 FR 16592) implementing the Treaty and making other 
updates to the ITAR.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Sarah J. Heidema, Office of Defense 
Trade Controls Policy, Directorate of Defense Trade Controls, Bureau of 
Political-Military Affairs, U.S. Department of State, Washington, DC 
20522-0112, telephone (202) 663-2809, email heidemasj@state.gov.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: On March 21, 2012, the Department of State 
published a rule (77 FR 16592) amending the ITAR to implement the 
Treaty, and identify via a supplement the defense articles and defense 
services that may not be exported pursuant to the Treaty. The rule also 
amended the ITAR section pertaining to the Canadian exemption and added 
Israel to the list of countries and entities that have a shorter 
Congressional notification certification time period and a higher 
dollar value reporting threshold. This rule indicated it would become 
effective upon the entry into force of the Treaty and that the 
Department of State would publish a rule document in the Federal 
Register announcing the effective date of this rule. This document is 
being published to make such announcement.

    Dated: May 30, 2012.
Beth M. McCormick,
Deputy Assistant Secretary, Defense Trade and Regional Security, Bureau 
of Political-Military Affairs, U.S. Department of State.
[FR Doc. 2012-13583 Filed 6-4-12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4710-25-P
```
# C_2013264EN.01000101.xml

| 13.9.2013 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 264/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

13.9.2013

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 264/1

---

RECOMMENDATION OF THE EUROPEAN CENTRAL BANK

of 2 September 2013

to the Council of the European Union on the external auditors of the Banco de España

(ECB/2013/32)

2013/C 264/01

THE GOVERNING COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN CENTRAL BANK,

Having regard to the Statute of the European System of Central Banks and of the European Central Bank, and in particular Article 27.1 thereof,

Whereas:

| (1) | The accounts of the European Central Bank (ECB) and national central banks of the Member States whose currency is the euro are audited by independent external auditors recommended by the ECB’s Governing Council and approved by the Council of the European Union. |
| --- | --- |

(1)

The accounts of the European Central Bank (ECB) and national central banks of the Member States whose currency is the euro are audited by independent external auditors recommended by the ECB’s Governing Council and approved by the Council of the European Union.

| (2) | The mandate of the Banco de España’s current external auditors ended following the audit for the financial year 2012. It is therefore necessary to appoint external auditors from the financial year 2013. |
| --- | --- |

(2)

The mandate of the Banco de España’s current external auditors ended following the audit for the financial year 2012. It is therefore necessary to appoint external auditors from the financial year 2013.

| (3) | The Banco de España has selected KPMG Auditores, S.L. as its external auditors for the financial years 2013 to 2017, |
| --- | --- |

(3)

The Banco de España has selected KPMG Auditores, S.L. as its external auditors for the financial years 2013 to 2017,

HAS ADOPTED THIS RECOMMENDATION:

It is recommended that KPMG Auditores, S.L. should be appointed as the external auditors of the Banco de España for the financial years 2013 to 2017.

Done at Frankfurt am Main, 2 September 2013.

The President of the ECB

Mario DRAGHI

---
```

                                                                    Exhibit 14.1

            CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

We  hereby  consent  to the  incorporation  by  reference  in  the  Registration
Statement  on Form S-8 (File No.  333-108510)  of Koor  Industries  Ltd.  of our
report dated June 12, 2007, with respect to the  consolidated  balance sheets of
Koor Industries  Ltd. and  subsidiaries as of December 31, 2006 and 2005 and the
related consolidated  statements of operations,  changes in shareholders' equity
and cash flows for each of the years in the three-year period ended December 31,
2006, which report appears in Koor Industries  Ltd.'s Annual Report on Form 20-F
for the year ended  December 31, 2006 and to the reference to our firm under the
heading "Selected Financial Data" in the Form 20-F.

/s/ Somekh Chaikin
-----------------------------------
Somekh Chaikin
Certified Public Accountants (Isr.)
Member Firm of KPMG International

Tel Aviv, Israel
June 12, 2007
```
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
 Washington, D.C. 20549
 FORM 8-K
 CURRENT REPORT
Pursuant to Section 13 OR 15(d) of The Securities Exchange Act of 1934
 Date of Report (Date of earliest event reported): June 29, 2011
 LINDSAY CORPORATION
  Delaware

1-13419

47-0554096(State or other jurisdiction
of incorporation)

(Commission File Number)

(IRS Employer Identification No.)
 2222 North 111th Street
Omaha, Nebraska

68164(Address of principal executive offices)

(Zip Code)
 (402) 829-6800
 Not applicable
 (Former name or former address, if changed since last report.)
  o

Written communications pursuant to Rule 425 under the Securities Act (17 CFR 230.425)o

Soliciting material pursuant to Rule 14a-12 under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.14a-12)o

Pre-commencement communications pursuant to Rule 14d-2(b) under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.14d-2(b))o

Pre-commencement communications pursuant to Rule 13e-4(c) under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.13e-4(c))




---



##### 



Item 2.02
    
    Results of Operations and Financial Condition.
  Item 9.01.
    
    Financial Statements and Exhibits
 99.1
    
    
    Press Release, dated June 29, 2011, issued by the Company.
  SIGNATURES
  Dated:  June 30, 2011
    LINDSAY CORPORATIONBy:
    /s/ Jim RaabeVP and Chief Financial Officer
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY HIGH

 11,180

 10,721

 11,432

 12,245

 12,107

 11,682

 10,678

 10,083

 9,934

 9,815

 9,107

 8,736

 7,721

 10,198

 11,111

 12,729

 13,436

 14,362

 13,424

 14,688

 14,328

 11,053

 12,321

 12,368

 11,586

 10,697

 10,711

 9,432

 10,855

 11,614

 9,498

 3,370

 2,969

 3,117

 3,529

 2,971

 2,624

 3,162

 3,205

 2,948

 3,761

 2,751

 3,311

 2,022

 3,412

 4,054

 3,277

 3,146

 3,970

 3,566

 4,203

 4,164

 4,170

 4,200

 3,059

 4,269

 4,835

 4,610

 3,143

 2,987

 3,958

 3,506

 6,081

 5,994

 6,462

 7,602

 7,191

 7,118

 6,468

 5,984

 6,589

 7,000

 6,206

 5,490

 4,911

 5,836

 6,437

 7,219

 7,548

 7,071

 7,530

 8,774

 8,722

 7,338

 8,032

 7,579

 8,086

 7,626

 6,964

 6,128

 6,874

 6,795

 5,731

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

JULY 2001 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: August 7, 2001

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

PITTSBURG TOP ON THE SACRAMENTO RIVER
###### Editorial Note on Part 416

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 416 appear at 68 FR 53509, Sept. 11, 2003.

#### § 416.1902 Definitions.

For purposes of this subpart—

*Authorization* means your written permission, in a form legally acceptable to us and to the State from which you received interim assistance, for us to withhold the appropriate SSI benefit payment and send it to the State.

*Interim assistance* means assistance the State gives you, including payments made on your behalf to providers of goods or services, to meet your basic needs, beginning with the first month for which you are eligible for payment of SSI benefits and ending with, and including, the month your SSI payments begin, or assistance the State gives you beginning with the day for which your eligibility for SSI benefits is reinstated after a period of suspension or termination and ending with, and including, the month the Commissioner makes the first payment of benefits following the suspension or termination if it is determined subsequently that you were eligible for benefits during that period. It does not include assistance the State gives to or for any other person. If the State has prepared and cannot stop delivery of its last assistance payment to you when it receives your SSI benefit payment from us, that assistance payment is included as interim assistance to be reimbursed. Interim assistance does not include assistance payments financed wholly or partly with Federal funds.

*SSI benefit payment* means your Federal benefit and any State supplementary payment made by us to you on behalf of a State (see subpart T of this part) which is due you at the time we make the first payment of benefits or when your benefits are reinstated after suspension or termination. Advance payment, as defined in § 416.520, payment based upon presumptive disability or presumptive blindness, as defined in § 416.931, or certain payments made under the administrative immediate payment procedure, are not considered SSI benefit payments for interim assistance purposes.

*State* for purposes of an interim assistance agreement, means a State of the United States, the District of Columbia, or the Northern Mariana Islands. For all other purposes (for example, payment, appeals, notices) *State* also means a political subdivision of any of these.

*We, Us,* or *Our* means the Social Security Administration.

*You* or *Your* means someone who has applied for or is already receiving SSI benefits.

[46 FR 47449, Sept. 28, 1981; 46 FR 50947, Oct. 16, 1981, as amended at 56 FR 19262, Apr. 26, 1991; 56 FR 25446, June 4, 1991; 62 FR 38455, July 18, 1997; 64 FR 31975, June 15, 1999]
#### Jack Linsky et al., Copartners under the Name of Speed Products Company, Appellants, v. Irving Hirsch et al., Respondents.

No opinion. Present — Martin, P. J., Townley, Untermyer, Cohn and Callahan, JJ.; Cohn and Callahan, JJ., dissent and vote to reverse and grant judgment for plaintiffs.
EXHIBIT 32

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT

TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with this Amendment No. 1 to the Annual Report of Advanced BioEnergy, LLC (the Company) on Form 10-K/A for the period ended September 30, 2011 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), we certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of our knowledge:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition
and results of operations of the Company.



/s/ Richard R. PetersonRichard R. PetersonChief Executive Officer and Chief
Financial OfficerJanuary 30, 2012
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY HIGH

 58

 62

 63

 58

 58

 65

 53

 57

 58

 60

 57

 57

 60

 58

 59

 63

 64

 65

 67

 70

 63

 76

 67

 66

 66

 64

 65

 72

 62

 67

 73

 52

 55

 53

 52

 52

 50

 51

 52

 55

 55

 53

 53

 55

 54

 54

 59

 59

 62

 62

 60

 60

 62

 61

 62

 60

 60

 61

 60

 59

 60

 64

 54

 58

 56

 54

 53

 53

 52

 54

 56

 56

 56

 55

 57

 56

 56

 60

 62

 62

 64

 63

 61

 65

 64

 64

 62

 62

 63

 62

 61

 63

 66

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

MARCH 2006 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: April 4, 2006

HIGH LOW MEAN

 52.5

 53.0

 52.5

 51.5

 51.5

 53.0

 52.8

 55.1

 53.7

 51.5

 50.3

 50.0

 51.2

 51.3

 50.9

 51.6

 51.6

 51.6

 51.8

 51.2

 50.9

 51.9

 52.6

 53.0

 53.4

 53.4

 52.7

 53.3

 52.2

 52.9

 53.6

 51.5

 52.0

 51.6

 50.9

 51.1

 51.2

 51.9

 51.4

 51.6

 50.3

 49.5

 49.3

 50.0

 50.6

 50.1

 50.5

 50.8

 50.2

 50.9

 50.2

 49.8

 50.8

 51.1

 52.0

 52.4

 51.7

 51.9

 52.2

 51.5

 51.7

 52.4

 52.1

 52.5

 52.0

 51.2

 51.3

 52.0

 52.3

 52.8

 52.6

 51.0

 49.9

 49.6

 50.6

 50.9

 50.5

 51.0

 51.2

 50.9

 51.3

 50.9

 50.4

 51.4

 51.8

 52.4

 52.9

 52.5

 52.3

 52.6

 51.9

 52.3

 52.9

HIGH LOW MEAN

 8.5

 10.1

 10.3

 10.5

 10.8

 10.6

 10.7

 10.8

 10.7

 11.0

 10.9

 11.0

 11.2

 11.1

 10.9

 10.9

 10.9

 10.9

 10.8

 10.8

 10.7

 10.7

 10.8

 10.5

 10.3

 9.9

 9.7

 10.2

 10.3

 10.3

 10.3

 8.5

 8.5

 10.0

 10.1

 10.3

 10.0

 10.3

 7.6

 7.2

 10.7

 10.7

 10.8

 10.9

 10.8

 10.6

 10.8

 10.7

 10.7

 10.6

 10.5

 10.6

 10.4

 10.5

 10.3

 9.8

 9.4

 9.5

 9.3

 10.0

 10.2

 10.0

 8.5

 8.9

 10.2

 10.3

 10.6

 10.4

 10.5

 9.6

 9.3

 10.8

 10.8

 10.9

 11.0

 10.9

 10.8

 10.8

 10.8

 10.8

 10.7

 10.6

 10.6

 10.6

 10.6

 10.4

 10.0

 9.6

 9.6

 9.7

 10.2

 10.2

 10.1

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

RIPON ON THE STANISLAUS RIVER

 ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS WATER TEMPERATURE, DEG DISSOLVED OXYZEN, PPM
### §2372. Repealed. Pub. L. 97–113, title VII, §725(a), Dec. 29, 1981, 95 Stat. 1553

Section, Pub. L. 87–195, pt. III, §620B, as added Pub. L. 95–92, §11, Aug. 4, 1977, 91 Stat. 619; amended Pub. L. 95–384, §12(c)(1), Sept. 26, 1978, 92 Stat. 737, prohibited assistance and sales to Argentina.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### National Institutes of Health

Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as amended (5 U.S.C. App), notice is hereby given of the following meeting.

The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 U.S.C., as amended. The contract proposals and the discussions could disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as patentable materials, and personal information concerning individuals associated with the contract proposals, the disclosure of which would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

*Name of Committee:*                         National Institute on Drug Abuse Special Emphasis Panel; NIDA Blending Research and Practice (1145).                    

*Date:*                         April 22, 2011.                    

*Time:*                         1 p.m. to 3 p.m.                    

*Agenda:*                         To review and evaluate contract proposals.                    

*Place:*                         National Institutes of Health, Neuroscience Center, 6001 Executive Boulevard, Rockville, MD 20852 (Telephone Conference Call).                    

*Contact Person:*                         Minna Liang, PhD, Scientific Review Officer, Training and Special Projects Review Branch, Office of Extramural Affairs, National Institute on Drug Abuse, NIH, DHHS, 6001 Executive Blvd., Room 4226, MSC 9550, Bethesda, MD 20852-9550 (301) 435-1432,                         *liangm@nida.nih.gov.*      ( print page 22716)    

This notice is being published less than 15 days prior to the meeting due to the timing limitations imposed by the review and funding cycle.

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos.: 93.279, Drug Abuse and Addiction Research Programs, National Institutes of Health, HHS)

Dated: April 15, 2011.

Jennifer Spaeth,

Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.

[FR Doc. 2011-9824 Filed 4-21-11; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4140-01-P
Exhibit
32.3






CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO SECTION 1350 OF CHAPTER 63


OF TITLE
18 OF THE UNITED STATES CODE








I, Andrew Stewart, the President and
principal executive officer of Man Investments (USA) Corp., the Managing Member
of Man-AHL 130, LLC (“Man-AHL 130”), certify that (i) the Annual Report of
Man-AHL 130 on Form 10-K/A for the year ending March 31, 2009 fully complies
with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act
of 1934 and (ii) the information contained in such Annual Report fairly
presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
operations of Man-AHL 130.











Date:  
March 19,
2010


/s/ Andrew
Stewart


Andrew
Stewart


President
Editorial Note on Part 416
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 416 appear at 68 FR 53509, Sept. 11, 2003.

§ 416.1507 Appointing a representative. Cross Reference
Link to an amendment published at 89 FR 67555 , Aug. 21, 2024.
We will recognize a person as your representative if the following things are done: ( a ) You sign a written notice stating that you want the person to be your representative in dealings with us.
( b ) That person signs the notice, agreeing to be your representative, if the person is not an attorney. An attorney does not have to sign a notice of appointment.
( c ) The notice is filed at one of our offices if you have initially filed a claim or requested reconsideration; with an administrative law judge if you have requested a hearing; or with the Appeals Council if you have requested a review of the administrative law judge's decision.
## F IRST 

## D ISTRICT 

## C OURT OF 

## A PPEAL 

## S TATE OF 

## F LORIDA

_____________________________
No. 1D 17

- 5065

_____________________________
D ANNY L EE F LAGG , Appellant,

v.

S TATE OF F LORIDA , Appellee.

_____________________________ On appeal from the Circuit Court for A lachua County

. Mark W. Moseley , Judge

. February 19, 2018

P ER C URIAM

.
A FFIRMED

.
R OBERTS , K ELSEY , and M.K. T HOMAS , JJ., concur

.

_____________________________ Not final until disposition of any timely and authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 9.331

.

_____________________________ Danny Lee Flagg, pro se
, Appellant.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee
, for Appellee

.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 19-7265

CECIL GUY TRUMAN,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

v.

MR. FRYE, Sergeant; MR. MCDOUGAL, Correctional Officer; MR. FARLEY, 

Correctional Officer,

Defendants - Appellees,

and

MR. HEATH, Magistrate,

Defendant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at 

Alexandria. Leonie M. Brinkema, District Judge. (1:18-cv-00963-LMB-IDD)

Submitted: June 18, 2020 Decided: June 30, 2020

Before WYNN, THACKER, and RUSHING, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed and remanded by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Cecil Guy Truman, Appellant Pro Se. 

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Cecil Guy Truman seeks to appeal the district court’s orders granting Appellees’ 

motion to dismiss his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2018) complaint for failure to state a claim and 

denying Truman’s motion for reconsideration. Although “[t]he parties to this appeal have 

not questioned our jurisdiction . . . , we have an independent obligation to verify the 

existence of appellate jurisdiction” and may exercise jurisdiction only over final orders and 

certain interlocutory and collateral orders. Porter v. Zook, 803 F.3d 694, 696 (4th Cir. 

2015) (internal quotation marks omitted); see 28 U.S.C. § 1292 (2018); Fed. R. Civ. P. 

54(b); Cohen v. Beneficial Indus. Loan Corp., 337 U.S. 541, 545-46 (1949). “Ordinarily, 

a district court order is not final until it has resolved all claims as to all parties.” Porter, 

803 F.3d at 696 (emphasis and internal quotation marks omitted). “Regardless of the label 

given a district court decision, if it appears from the record that the district court has not 

adjudicated all of the issues in a case, then there is no final order.” Id.

In this case, the district court failed to address Truman’s claims that Jordan 

McDougal violated his rights under the Due Process and Equal Protection Clauses of the 

Fourteenth Amendment. Because the district court did not rule on those claims, it “never 

issued a final decision” in this matter. Id. at 699. Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for 

lack of jurisdiction and remand to the district court for consideration of Truman’s 

remaining claims. We express no opinion on the ultimate disposition of those claims, and 

we deny Truman’s motion to appoint counsel. We dispense with oral argument because 
3

the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court 

and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED AND REMANDED