alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Editorial Note on Part 416
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 416 appear at 68 FR 53509, Sept. 11, 2003.

§ 416.1545 Violations of our requirements, rules, or standards. When we have evidence that a representative fails to meet our qualification requirements or has violated the rules governing dealings with us, we may begin proceedings to suspend or disqualify that individual from acting in a representational capacity before us. We may file charges seeking such sanctions when we have evidence that a representative: ( a ) Does not meet the qualifying requirements described in § 416.1505;
( b ) Has violated the affirmative duties or engaged in the prohibited actions set forth in § 416.1540;
( c ) Has been convicted of a violation under section 1631(d) of the Act;
( d ) Has been, by reason of misconduct, disbarred or suspended from any bar or court to which he or she was previously admitted to practice (see § 416.1570(a));
( e ) Has been, by reason of misconduct, disqualified from participating in or appearing before any Federal program or agency (see § 416.1570(a)); or
( f ) Who, as a non-attorney, has been removed from practice or suspended by a professional licensing authority for reasons that reflect on the person's character, integrity, judgment, reliability, or fitness to serve as a fiduciary.
[63 FR 41418, Aug. 4, 1998, as amended at 71 FR 2877, Jan. 18, 2006; 83 FR 30858, July 2, 2018]
### §2655b. Diplomatic presence overseas

#### (a) Purpose

The purpose of this section is to—

(1) elevate the stature given United States diplomatic initiatives relating to nonproliferation and political-military issues; and

(2) develop a group of highly specialized, technical experts with country expertise capable of administering the nonproliferation and political-military affairs functions of the Department.

#### (b) Authority

To carry out the purposes of subsection (a), the Secretary is authorized to establish the position of Counselor for Nonproliferation and Political Military Affairs in United States diplomatic missions overseas, to be filled by individuals who are career Civil Service officers or Foreign Service officers committed to follow-on assignments in the Nonproliferation Bureau or the Political Military Affairs Bureau of the Department.

#### (c) Training

After being selected to serve as Counselor, any person so selected shall spend not less than 10 months in language training courses at the Foreign Service Institute,1 or in technical courses administered by the Department of Defense, the Department of Energy, or other appropriate departments and agencies of the United States, except that such requirement for training may be waived by the Secretary.

(Pub. L. 107–228, div. B, title XVI, §1604, Sept. 30, 2002, 116 Stat. 1460.)

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Change of Name

References to Foreign Service Institute considered to refer to George P. Shultz National Foreign Affairs Training Center, see section 1(b) of Pub. L. 107–132, set out as a note under section 4021 of this title.

#### Definitions

For definitions of "Department" and "Secretary" as used in this section, see section 3 of Pub. L. 107–228, set out as a note under section 2651 of this title.

1 See Change of Name note below.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM LOT$OFF
STORES CORPORATION FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AS OF AND FOR THE TWENTY-SIX WEEKS ENDED
AUGUST 1, 1997, AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          AUG-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               AUG-01-1997
<CASH>                                             453
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                      616
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                     11,075
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                12,694
<PP&E>                                           7,442
<DEPRECIATION>                                   3,625
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  16,942
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            9,597
<BONDS>                                          1,445
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                      8,271
<COMMON>                                             9
<OTHER-SE>                                     (2,380)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    16,942
<SALES>                                         22,300
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                22,300
<CGS>                                           14,934
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   14,934
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                11,640
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 269
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (4,543)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (4,543)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (4,543)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.49)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.49)
        

</TABLE>
DISMISS and Opinion Filed September 27, 2021

In The 

### Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

No. 05

- 21

- 00652

- CV

SB PREMIUM, LLC D/B/A SUICIDE BUNNY, TIFFANY GRESHAM, LARRY SCOTT GRESHAM, SB PRODUCTS, SUICIDE BUNNY, AND WAGES AND WHITE LION INVESTMENTS, LLC D/B/A

TRITON DISTRIBUTION, Appellants

V. BRANDIE HARRIS, INDIVIDUALLY AND AS HEIR AND REPRESENTATIVE OF THE ES TATE OF NEIL HARRIS, AND AS NEXT FRIEND OF MINORS O.H., A.H., AND B.H. , Appellee

On Appeal from the 68th Judicial District Court

Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. DC

- 19

- 00359

MEMORANDUM OPINION Before Justices Myers, Partida

- Kipness, and Carlyle

Opinion by Justice Myers Before the Court is appellants’ motion requesting that we withdraw their

notice of appeal and dismiss the appeal. We grant the motion to the extent that we

dismiss the appeal. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 42.1 (a)(1).

210652f.p05 /Lana Myers/ / LANA MYERS JUSTICE– 2

– 

### Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

JUDGMENT

SB PREMIUM, LLC D/B/A SUICIDE BUNNY, TIFFANY GRESHAM, LARRY SCOTT GRESHAM, SB PRODUCTS, SUICIDE BUNNY, AND WAGES AND WHITE LION INVESTMENTS, LLC, D/B/A TRITON DISTRIBUTION, Appellants

No. 05

- 21

- 00652

- CV V.

BRANDIE HARRIS, INDIVIDUALLY AND AS HEIR AND REPRESENTATIVE OF THE ESTATE OF NEIL HARRIS, AND AS NEXT FRIEND OF MINORS O.H., A.H., AND B.H., Appellee On Appeal from the 68th Judicial District Cour t, Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. DC

- 19

- 00359. Opinion delivered by Justice Myers. Justices Partida

- Kipness and Carlyle participating.

In accordance with this Court’s opinion of this date, the appeal is DISMISSED

.

It is ORDERED that appellee BRANDIE HARRIS, INDIVIDUALLY AND AS HEIR AND REPRESENTATIVE OF THE ESTATE OF NEIL HARRIS, AND AS NEXT FRIEND OF MINORS O.H., A.H., AND B.H. recover her costs of this appeal from appellants SB PREMIUM, LLC D/B/A SUICIDE BUNNY, TIFFANY GRESHAM, LARRY SCOTT GRESHAM, SB PRODUCTS, SUICIDE BUNNY, AND WAGES AND WHITE LION INVESTMENTS, LLC, D/B/A TRITON DISTRIBUTORS.– 3

–

Judgment entered this 27 th day of Sept ember

, 2021

.
#### § 408.611 What happens to your monthly benefits while we are finding a suitable representative payee for you?

For an explanation of the policy we use to determine what happens to your monthly benefits while we are finding a suitable representative payee for you, see § 404.2011 of this chapter.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

DAY HIGH

 2,897

 2,755

 3,068

 3,046

 3,835

 4,546

 5,850

 5,533

 5,885

 5,205

 5,114

 7,055

 5,357

 5,577

 4,994

 4,921

 5,407

 5,694

 5,516

 5,124

 6,333

 5,809

 6,917

 5,157

 5,071

 4,442

 4,472

 4,264

 535

 646

 588

 580

 538

 607

 758

 662

 699

 720

 746

 952

 1,074

 1,240

 1,120

 1,107

 1,160

 1,115

 909

 722

 639

 454

 530

 535

 470

 562

 570

 597

 1,269

 1,278

 1,102

 1,041

 1,221

 1,595

 2,111

 2,232

 1,941

 1,926

 2,143

 2,443

 2,536

 2,528

 2,426

 2,331

 2,517

 2,149

 2,021

 2,236

 2,406

 2,431

 2,544

 1,630

 1,364

 1,336

 1,365

 1,507

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

FEBRUARY 2002 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: March 11, 2002

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

PITTSBURG TOP ON THE SACRAMENTO RIVER
Editorial Note on Part 416
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 416 appear at 68 FR 53509, Sept. 11, 2003.

§ 416.2209 Responsibility for making payment decisions. The Commissioner will decide: ( a ) Whether a continuous period of 9 months of SGA has been completed;
( b ) Whether a disability or blindness recipient whose disability or blindness has ceased should continue to receive benefits under section 1631(a)(6) of the Social Security Act for a month after October 1984 or, in the case of a blindness recipient, for a month after March 1988, based on his or her continued participation in a VR program;
( c ) If and when medical recovery has occurred;
( d ) Whether documentation of VR services and expenditures is adequate;
( e ) If payment is to be based on completion of a continuous 9-month period of SGA, whether the VR services contributed to the continuous period of SGA;
( f ) Whether a VR service is a service described in § 416.2214; and
( g ) What VR costs were reasonable and necessary and will be paid.
[55 FR 8456, Mar. 8, 1990, as amended at 59 FR 11918, Mar. 15, 1994; 61 FR 31026, June 19, 1996; 68 FR 40125, July 7, 2003]
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

DAY HIGH

 98

 96

 101

 92

 91

 103

 91

 100

 94

 103

 97

 105

 96

 107

 105

 101

 104

 105

 98

 100

 103

 113

 112

 110

 115

 106

 99

 99

 100

 111

 86

 85

 83

 85

 82

 86

 85

 87

 87

 86

 86

 88

 88

 91

 88

 90

 88

 85

 92

 93

 88

 96

 92

 91

 91

 89

 91

 93

 90

 94

 89

 88

 87

 88

 85

 90

 88

 89

 89

 91

 91

 92

 91

 93

 92

 93

 91

 90

 95

 97

 94

 99

 96

 95

 94

 94

 94

 96

 95

 97

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

SEPTEMBER 2001 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: October 23, 2001

HIGH LOW MEAN

 73.0

 73.5

 73.7

 73.3

 72.8

 71.0

 70.2

 69.9

 69.7

 69.8

 69.9

 70.2

 70.2

 71.1

 71.4

 70.8

 70.2

 70.7

 70.6

 70.4

 69.8

 69.1

 67.9

 67.8

 68.7

 68.5

 68.2

 67.0

 67.1

 67.7

 68.3

 69.2

 69.5

 69.2

 68.6

 66.9

 66.1

 65.6

 65.5

 65.6

 66.0

 66.2

 65.8

 66.5

 67.5

 66.6

 66.2

 66.4

 66.3

 67.0

 66.3

 65.8

 65.1

 64.5

 64.9

 64.9

 65.0

 63.6

 62.8

 63.4

 70.8

 71.3

 71.7

 71.2

 70.7

 69.2

 68.3

 67.9

 67.7

 67.7

 68.0

 68.1

 68.1

 68.8

 69.5

 68.8

 68.2

 68.6

 68.6

 68.8

 68.2

 67.6

 66.8

 66.3

 66.9

 67.0

 66.9

 65.5

 65.2

 65.7

HIGH LOW MEAN

 8.7

 8.5

 8.4

 8.9

 8.6

 8.8

 8.8

 8.8

 8.8

 8.7

 8.6

 8.6

 8.6

 8.3

 8.4

 8.3

 8.4

 8.3

 8.3

 8.4

 8.4

 8.4

 8.6

 8.6

 8.6

 8.3

 8.4

 8.6

 8.4

 8.6

 7.8

 7.8

 7.7

 7.6

 7.8

 7.8

 7.9

 7.9

 8.0

 7.9

 7.9

 7.6

 7.6

 7.6

 7.4

 7.4

 7.5

 7.6

 7.4

 7.4

 7.6

 7.7

 7.7

 7.8

 7.7

 7.6

 7.6

 7.8

 7.8

 7.8

 8.1

 8.0

 7.9

 8.0

 8.1

 8.2

 8.3

 8.3

 8.3

 8.2

 8.1

 8.0

 8.0

 7.9

 7.8

 7.8

 7.9

 7.8

 7.8

 7.8

 7.9

 8.0

 8.1

 8.2

 8.1

 7.9

 7.9

 8.1

 8.1

 8.1

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

RIPON ON THE STANISLAUS RIVER

 ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS WATER TEMPERATURE, DEG DISSOLVED OXYZEN, PPM
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

DAY HIGH

 219

 215

 221

 219

 208

 207

 215

 201

 196

 185

 179

 178

 176

 173

 172

 174

 0

 176

 188

 201

 177

 171

 176

 172

 171

 176

 179

 187

 970

 297

 192

 196

 198

 193

 188

 181

 179

 186

 180

 174

 173

 167

 162

 157

 155

 157

 0

 163

 162

 160

 158

 158

 157

 161

 160

 161

 158

 162

 164

 161

 204

 205

 206

 204

 199

 193

 191

 193

 187

 180

 176

 172

 167

 163

 161

 164

 0

 169

 172

 172

 166

 163

 164

 166

 166

 165

 165

 168

 259

 183

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

APRIL 2019 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: May 6, 2019

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

PORT CHICAGO BOTTOM IN SUISUN BAY
No. 01-14-00189-CR
IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS
OF THE STATE OF TEXAS

RUBEN TOTTEN, Appellant

v. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

Appeal from Harris County

* * * * *
STATE’S MOTION TO EXTEND TIME FOR

FILING ITS PETITION FOR DISCRETIONARY REVIEW

* * * * * Lisa C. McMinn State Prosecuting Attorney Bar I.D. No. 13803300 John R. Messinger Asst. State Prosecuting Attorney Bar I.D. No. 24053705
P. O. Box 13046 Austin, Texas 78711 512/463-1660 (Telephone) 512/463-5724 (Fax) PD-0483-15 COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS

AUSTIN, TEXAS Transmitted 4/30/2015 4:30:43 PM Accepted 5/1/2015 11:31:49 AM

ABEL ACOSTA CLERKTO THE HONORABLE COURT OF CRIMI NAL APPEALS:

Co m es no w th e St at e of Tex as , by an d th ro ug h it s St at e Pro se cu ti ng Att or ne y ,

an d res pe ct fu ll y su bm it s to th e Co ur t it s m ot io n to ex t e n d t h e ti m e fo r fil in g it s
pe ti ti o n fo r di sc ret io na ry rev ie w to an d in cl ud in g th e 15 da y of May, 20 15

. It ha s th

rece nt ly co m e to ou r at te nt io n th at th e reco rd m ay no t accu rat el y refl ect th e te st im on y th at fo rm s th e ba si s of th e op in io n be lo w. Add it io na l ti m e is req ui red to de te rm in e if
th is can be ve rif

ie d an d, if so , wha t st ep s m us t be ta ke n to co rrec t th e reco rd

. No
pr ev io us m ot io ns to ex te nd th e d ead li ne for fil in g t hi s p et it io n h av e b een fil ed

. W HEREFORE, th e St at e pr ay s th at it s m ot io n to ex te nd th e ti m e fo r fil in g i ts
pe ti ti on un ti l M ay

15 , 20 15 , be g ran te d.

Res pe ct fu ll y su bm it te d,

/s/ Jo hn R. Mes si ng er JOHN R. MESS INGER Ass is ta nt Sta te Pro se cu ti ng Att or ne y Bar I .D. No. 24 05 37 05
P.O. Box 13 04 6 Aus ti n, Tex as 78 71 1 51 2/ 46 3- 16 60 (Tele ph on e) 51 2/ 46 3- 57 24 (Fax )

1CERTI FICATE OF SERVI CE

A c o p y of th e fo reg oi ng St at e’s Mo ti on to Ext en d th e Tim e fo r Fi li ng it s Pet it io n fo r Dis cret io na ry Rev ie w ha s be en eFi le d or e-m ai le d on th is th e 30 da y of th Apr il , 20 15 to : Alan Cu rry Ch ie f, App el la te Div is io n, Har ris Co un ty D is tri ct Att or ne y ’s Offic e 12 01 Fran kl in , Sui te 60 0 Hou st on , Texa s 7 70 02 CURRY_ ALAN@d ao .hc tx .ne t
Sara h V. Wood 12 01 Fran kl in Str eet , 13 th Flo or Hou st on , Texa s 7 70 02 Sara h.Woo d@ pd o.h ct x.n et

/s/ Jo hn R. Mes si ng er Jo hn R. Mes si ng er Ass is ta nt Sta te Pro se cu ti ng Att or ne y

2
### SUBCHAPTER I—CENTER BETWEEN EAST AND WEST
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

DAY ELEV

 1,064.70

 1,064.57

 1,064.47

 1,064.38

 1,064.32

 1,064.22

 1,064.17

 1,064.06

 1,064.03

 1,063.95

 1,063.79

 1,063.52

 1,063.16

 1,062.84

 1,062.50

 1,062.18

 1,061.87

 1,061.60

 1,061.18

 1,060.75

 1,060.40

 1,060.06

 1,059.76

 1,059.35

 1,058.94

 1,058.57

 1,058.14

 1,057.83

 1,057.42

 1,056.95

 2,140.4

 2,138.9

 2,137.8

 2,136.7

 2,136.0

 2,134.9

 2,134.3

 2,133.0

 2,132.7

 2,131.8

 2,129.9

 2,126.8

 2,122.7

 2,119.0

 2,115.2

 2,111.5

 2,107.9

 2,104.9

 2,100.1

 2,095.2

 2,091.2

 2,087.3

 2,083.9

 2,079.3

 2,074.6

 2,070.5

 2,065.6

 2,062.1

 2,057.5

 2,052.2

STORAGE

-1.6

-1.5

-1.2

-1.0

-0.7

-1.2

-0.6

-1.3

-0.3

-0.9

-1.8

-3.1

-4.1

-3.7

-3.9

-3.7

-3.5

-3.1

-4.8

-4.9

-4.0

-3.9

-3.4

-4.6

-4.6

-4.2

-4.9

-3.5

-4.6

-5.3

CHANGE

1,234

1,218

1,235

1,124

1,174

1,410

1,461

1,449

1,546

1,170

1,183

1,158

1,351

1,267

1,010

1,140

1,200

1,366

1,528

1,280

1,067

1,294

1,419

1,182

1,043

1,323

1,188

1,488

1,223

1,170

INFLOW

 1,905

 1,843

 1,693

 1,493

 1,400

 1,842

 1,602

 1,950

 1,601

 1,560

 1,961

 2,602

 3,306

 3,012

 2,846

 2,906

 2,894

 2,827

 3,815

 3,634

 2,964

 3,159

 2,995

 3,397

 3,304

 3,280

 3,582

 3,173

 3,488

 3,764

POWER

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

SPILL

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

OUTLET

 142

 130

 123

 153

 123

 149

 149

 138

 119

 74

 149

 119

 130

 104

 126

 81

 92

 92

 129

 114

 110

 84

 139

 128

 81

 150

 55

 77

 62

 73

C.F.S.

 .38

 .35

 .33

 .41

 .33

 .40

 .40

 .37

 .32

 .20

 .40

 .32

 .35

 .28

 .34

 .22

 .25

 .25

 .35

 .31

 .30

 .23

 .38

 .35

 .22

 .41

 .15

 .21

 .17

 .20

INCHES

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

PRECIP

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

SEPTEMBER 2011 NEW MELONES LAKE DAILY OPERATIONS RUN DATE: December 14, 2011

IN LAKE

EVAPORATION

INCHES

C.F.S.

COMPUTED*

1000 ACRE-FEET

RELEASE - C.F.S.

TOTALS -89.9 37,901 79,798 0 0 3,395 9.18 .00

ACRE-FEET -89,900 75,177 158,279 0 0 6,734

COMMENTS:

* COMPUTED INFLOW IS THE SUM OF CHANGE IN STORAGE, RELEASES AND EVAPORATION.

SUMMARY

RELEASE (ACRE-FEET)

POWER 158,279

SPILL 0

OUTLET

TOTAL

 0

 158,279

PRECIPITATION

THIS MONTH =

TO DATE =

 .00

JULY 1, 2011 .00

 2,142.0
#### Alfred Carveth, Appellant, v. Mary Carveth, Respondent.

Present — Crosby, P. J., Cunningham, Dowling, Harris and McCurn, JJ.
### §1644i. Time limitation on completion of affairs of Commission

The Commission shall complete its affairs in connection with the settlement of claims pursuant to this subchapter not later than three years following the final date for the filing of claims as provided in section 1644b of this title.

(Mar. 10, 1950, ch. 54, title VI, §609, as added Pub. L. 94–542, Oct. 18, 1976, 90 Stat. 2512.)
IIB 

114TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 4010 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JUNE 22, 2016 

Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Homeland Security and 

Governmental Affairs 

AN ACT 

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service 

located at 522 North Central Avenue in Phoenix, Arizona, as the ‘‘Ed Pastor Post Office’’. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 


smartinez on DSK3GLQ082PROD with BILLS
2 

HR 4010 RFS

1 SECTION 1. ED PASTOR POST OFFICE. 

2 (a) DESIGNATION.—The facility of the United States 

3 Postal Service located at 522 North Central Avenue in 

4 Phoenix, Arizona, shall be known and designated as the 

5 ‘‘Ed Pastor Post Office’’. 

6 (b) REFERENCES.—Any reference in a law, map, reg7 ulation, document, paper, or other record of the United 

8 States to the facility referred to in subsection (a) shall 

9 be deemed to be a reference to the ‘‘Ed Pastor Post Of10 fice’’. 

Passed the House of Representatives June 21, 2016. 

Attest: KAREN L. HAAS, 

Clerk. 


smartinez on DSK3GLQ082PROD with BILLS
#### Adam Frank v. Rowland & Shafto and Another.

Motion granted. Present — Ingraham, P. J., Clarke, Scott, Dowling and Hotchkiss, JJ.
(No. 6738

#### Pitney-Bowes, Inc., Claimant, *vs.*State of Illinois, Department of Insurance, Respondent.

*Opinion filed June 5, 1974.*

Pitney-Bowes, Inc., Claimant, pro se.

William J. Scott, Attorney General; Howard W. Feldman, Assistant Attorney General, for Respondent.

Per Curiam.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 9
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1999
<CASH>                                          43,104
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                          20,815
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                22,713
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                    313,332
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                         102,713
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                           104,588
<LOANS>                                        886,714
<ALLOWANCE>                                     12,888
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,451,011
<DEPOSITS>                                   1,141,507
<SHORT-TERM>                                    60,235
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                             17,833
<LONG-TERM>                                     99,182
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        43,706
<OTHER-SE>                                      88,548
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>               1,451,011
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                 18,649
<INTEREST-INVEST>                                5,804
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                   336
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                                24,789
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                               9,726
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              11,653
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                           13,136
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                      525
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                   0
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                 11,049
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  5,927
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                       4,180
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     4,180
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.48
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.48
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    4.22
<LOANS-NON>                                      3,795
<LOANS-PAST>                                     3,345
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                     0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                 24,061
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                12,817
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                    1,016
<RECOVERIES>                                       562
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                               12,888
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                             9,671
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                          3,217
        

</TABLE>
Docket No. FAA-2011-1330

Air Medic petition to amend Exemption No. 6515, formerly docket no. 28689 (issued Oct. 

3, 1996)

Relevant documents from former hardcopy docket 28689 are scanned to PDF and uploaded to 

Docket No. FAA-2011-1330