alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**EXHIBIT 24****POWER OF ATTORNEY**Each of the undersigned hereby appoints Revis L. Stephenson III, Richard Peterson and Perry C.Johnston, and each of them (with full power to act alone), as attorneys and agents for theundersigned, with full power of substitution, for and in the name, place and stead of theundersigned, to sign and file with the Securities and Exchange Commission under the Securities Actof 1934, the annual report on Form 10-KSB of Advanced BioEnergy, LLC for the fiscal year endedSeptember 30, 2007 and any and all amendments and exhibits to that annual report on Form 10-KSB andany and all applications, instruments, and other documents to be filed with the Securities andExchange Commission pertaining to that annual report on Form 10-KSB or any amendments thereto, withfull power and authority to do and perform any and all acts and things whatsoever requisite andnecessary or desirable. This power of attorney has been signed below by the following persons inthe capacities indicated on the dates indicated.     Name Title Date /s/ Revis L. Stephenson III Revis L. Stephenson III Chairman, Chief ExecutiveOfficer and Director(Principal ExecutiveOfficer)  12/10/07     /s/ Richard Peterson Richard Peterson Vice President ofAccounting and Financeand Chief FinancialOfficer (PrincipalFinancial and AccountingOfficer)  12/07/07     /s/ Robert W. Holmes  Director  12/10/07Robert W. Holmes         /s/ Robert E. Bettger  Director  12/10/07Robert E. Bettger         /s/ Larry L. Cerny  Director  12/10/07Larry L. Cerny         /s/ Richard W. Hughes  Director  12/11/07Richard W. Hughes         /s/ Dale Locken  Director  12/20/07Dale Locken         /s/ John E. Lovegrove  Director  12/10/07John E. Lovegrove         /s/ Troy Otte  Director  12/10/07Troy Otte         /s/ Keith E. Spohn  Director  12/10/07Keith E. Spohn
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

December 20, 2019

Annual Power System Generation Summary

12/31/2018 RUN DATE:

 3,353

 1,742,516

SHASTA 

 1,739,163

 326,764

 1,558

 325,206

 276,921

 278,590

 1,499

 209,486

 95

 129,383

 282

 590,814

 7,446

 583,368

 59,693

 234

 59,459

 9,797

 186

 9,611

 2,550

 2,214

 142,051

 3,813,430

 3,955,481

 3,797,093

 3,939,144

KESWICK 

TRINITY 

JF CARR

SPRING CREEK

FOLSOM 

NIMBUS 

Total Net

Total Gross

Federal Share of San Luis

O'NEILL

STAMPEDE (Washoe Project)

GROSS GEN

STA. SERV. 

NET GEN. 

GROSS GEN 

STA. SERV. 

NET GEN. 

TR GEN.

GROSS GEN. 

STA. SERV. 

GROSS GEN.

STA. SERV. 

GROSS GEN. 

STA. SERV. 

GROSS GEN. 

STA. SERV. 

NET GEN. 

GROSS GEN. 

STA. SERV. 

NET GEN. 

Generation 

With Federal Share of San Luis 

Generation 

With Federal Share of San Luis 

Out Meter

GROSS GEN 

NET GEN. 

GROSS GEN. 

STA. SERV. 

NET GEN.

MWH 

MWH 

MWH 

MWH 

MWH 

MWH 

MWH 

MWH 

MWH

MWH 

MWH 

MWH 

MWH 

MWH 

MWH 

MWH 

MWH 

MWH 

MWH 

MWH 

MWH 

MWH

MWH 

MWH 

MWH 

MWH 

MWH 

MWH 

MWH 

LN GEN. 1,669

MWH 

NET GEN. 277,091 MWH

 209,391 NET GEN. MWH 

 129,101 NET GEN. MWH 

 473,634

 1,534

 472,100

NEW MELONES

GROSS GEN. 

STA. SERV. 

NET GEN. 

MWH 

MWH 

MWH 

Calendar Year 2018: 01/01/2018 -

:
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

December 20, 2019

Annual Power System Generation Summary

09/30/2018 RUN DATE:

 3,315

 1,837,512

SHASTA 

 1,834,197

 333,207

 1,572

 331,635

 287,933

 289,620

 1,497

 213,600

 115

 127,734

 604

 647,698

 6,787

 640,911

 65,801

 266

 65,535

 11,711

 194

 11,517

 2,564

 2,214

 139,623

 4,046,477

 4,186,100

 4,030,436

 4,170,059

KESWICK 

TRINITY 

JF CARR

SPRING CREEK

FOLSOM 

NIMBUS 

Total Net

Total Gross

Federal Share of San Luis

O'NEILL

STAMPEDE (Washoe Project)

GROSS GEN

STA. SERV. 

NET GEN. 

GROSS GEN 

STA. SERV. 

NET GEN. 

TR GEN.

GROSS GEN. 

STA. SERV. 

GROSS GEN.

STA. SERV. 

GROSS GEN. 

STA. SERV. 

GROSS GEN. 

STA. SERV. 

NET GEN. 

GROSS GEN. 

STA. SERV. 

NET GEN. 

Generation 

With Federal Share of San Luis 

Generation 

With Federal Share of San Luis 

Out Meter

GROSS GEN 

NET GEN. 

GROSS GEN. 

STA. SERV. 

NET GEN.

MWH 

MWH 

MWH 

MWH 

MWH 

MWH 

MWH 

MWH 

MWH

MWH 

MWH 

MWH 

MWH 

MWH 

MWH 

MWH 

MWH 

MWH 

MWH 

MWH 

MWH 

MWH

MWH 

MWH 

MWH 

MWH 

MWH 

MWH 

LN GEN. 1,687

MWH 

NET GEN. 288,123 MWH

NET GEN. 213,485 MWH 

 127,130 NET GEN. MWH 

 528,741

 1,535

 527,206

NEW MELONES

GROSS GEN. 

STA. SERV. 

NET GEN. 

MWH 

MWH 

MWH 

Fiscal Year 10/01/2017 -

MWH 

2018:
### Meeting Note to Docket Summary of Tasks and Next Steps

F or Tribal Environmental Professionals Workgroup

March 3 , 2009

Discussion Topics

On March 3 , 2009, a representative from the US Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) upda ted interested tri bal environmental professionals on the status of the workgroup efforts re garding the rule titled: “Review of New Sources and Modifications in Indian country. ” Th e update included general concerns and issues related to this action, including:

• T ribes participating in this workgroup would like that all enforcement auth ority

related t o this rule be delegated to them

.

• Tribes participating in this workgroup would like EPA regional offices to develop general permits for gas stations, boilers, emergency generators, co

- generators and oil and gas compressor stations

.

• How tribes can collect fees for permitting. The workgroup had discussed that

tribes can collect pe rmit fees under an EPA

- approved TIP . Fo r those tribes who

de sire t o administer a delegated New Source Review (NSR) program, these tribes

can collect fees under their own authority not under federal authority.

• Develop ing a model delegation package. This package will include model regulatory language that tribes can use to request delegation of the federal NSR

program.

• Sources to pe rmit first. Tribes participating in this workgroup are interested in permitting new sourc es first, particularly synthetic minors.

• T ribes participating in this workgroup would like EPA to c onsider protecting cultural resources in permitting.

• T ribes participating in this workgroup would like EPA to register all existing sources on Indian country to help with the development of emissions inventories

• T ribes participating in this workgroup would like EPA to explore how the Federal

Air Rule for Reservatio ns o verlaps with this rule.

• T ribes participating in this workgroup would like EPA to explore how this rule will impact Tribes in the State of Oklahoma

.
###### Editorial Note on Part 416

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 416 appear at 68 FR 53509, Sept. 11, 2003.

#### § 416.1482 Extension of time to file action in Federal district court.

Any party to the Appeals Council's decision or denial of review, or to an expedited appeals process agreement, may request that the time for filing an action in a Federal district court be extended. The request must be in writing and it must give the reasons why the action was not filed within the stated time period. The request must be filed with the Appeals Council, or if it concerns an expedited appeals process agreement, with one of our offices. If you show that you had good cause for missing the deadline, the time period will be extended. To determine whether good cause exists, we use the standards explained in § 416.1411.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY

 8,522

 8,666

 8,822

 8,936

 9,022

 9,118

 9,200

 9,313

 9,397

 9,487

 9,561

 9,710

 9,828

 9,922

 10,054

 10,252

 10,519

 10,891

 11,317

 11,802

 12,286

 12,725

 13,244

 13,823

 14,405

 14,854

 15,286

 15,860

 16,534

 17,389

 17,988

 23,774

 24,006

 24,251

 24,462

 24,654

 24,843

 25,028

 25,220

 25,225

 25,086

 24,879

 24,767

 24,627

 24,484

 24,328

 24,197

 24,091

 24,019

 23,992

 23,974

 23,966

 23,948

 23,952

 23,992

 24,051

 24,060

 24,064

 24,100

 24,175

 23,974

 24,556

STORAGE - A.F. 

 32,296

 32,672

 33,073

 33,398

 33,676

 33,961

 34,228

 34,533

 34,622

 34,573

 34,440

 34,477

 34,455

 34,406

 34,382

 34,449

 34,610

 34,910

 35,309

 35,776

 36,252

 36,673

 37,196

 37,815

 38,456

 38,914

 39,350

 39,960

 40,709

 41,363

 42,544

1,223

1,289

2,017

1,928

1,359

1,110

948

862

857

1,006

951

1,388

1,436

1,105

1,102

1,033

1,116

1,179

1,257

1,214

1,094

1,097

1,046

1,042

1,128

1,234

1,065

933

977

1,515

1,396

1,390

1,479

2,219

2,092

1,499

1,254

1,083

1,016

902

981

884

1,407

1,425

1,080

1,090

1,067

1,197

1,330

1,458

1,449

1,334

1,309

1,310

1,354

1,451

1,465

1,285

1,241

1,355

1,845

1,991

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

MARCH 2010 FULL NATURAL FLOW AT NEW MELONES DAM RUN DATE: 04/01/2010

TOTALS +10,579 42,242

* October 1, 83,787

 208.0

 211.0

 215.4

 219.5

 222.5

 225.0

 227.1

 229.1

 230.9

 232.9

 234.6

 237.4

 240.2

 242.4

 244.6

 246.7

 249.0

 251.7

 254.6

 257.4

 260.1

 262.7

 265.3

 268.0

 270.9

 273.8

 276.3

 278.8

 281.5

 285.1

 289.1

DONNELLS

RES

BEARDSLEY

RES

2009 TO DATE

NEW

MELONES

INFLOW

C.F.S

NATURAL

RIVER

C.F.S

ACCUM *

FULL

NATURAL

1000 A.F.

RESERVOIR

TOTAL

+331

+376

+401

+325

+278

+285

+267

+305

+89

-49

-133

+37

-22

-49

-24

+67

+161

+300

+399

+467

+476

+421

+523

+619

+641

+458

+436

+610

+749

+654

+1,181

CHANGE

A.F. C.F.S.

+167

+190

+202

+164

+140

+144

+135

+154

+45

-25

-67

+19

-11

-25

-12

+34

+81

+151

+201

+235

+240

+212

+264

+312

+323

+231

+220

+308

+378

+330

+595
### §2151x. Development and illicit narcotics production

#### (a) Congressional statement of findings

The Congress recognizes that illicit narcotics cultivation is related to overall development problems and that the vast majority of all individuals employed in the cultivation of illicit narcotics reside in the developing countries and are among the poorest of the poor in those countries and that therefore the ultimate success of any effort to eliminate illicit narcotics production depends upon the availability of alternative economic opportunities for those individuals, upon other factors which assistance under this part could address, as well as upon direct narcotics control efforts.

#### (b) Program planning priorities; resource utilization

(1) In planning programs of assistance under this part, and part X of this subchapter, and under part IV of subchapter II of this chapter for countries in which there is illicit narcotics cultivation, the agency primarily responsible for administering subchapter I of this chapter should give priority consideration to programs which would help reduce illicit narcotics cultivation by stimulating broader development opportunities.

(2) The agency primarily responsible for administering subchapter I of this chapter may utilize resources for activities aimed at increasing awareness of the effects of production and trafficking of illicit narcotics on source and transit countries.

#### (c) Administrative requirements

In furtherance of the purposes of this section, the agency primarily responsible for administering subchapter I of this chapter shall cooperate fully with, and share its expertise in development matters with, other agencies of the United States Government involved in narcotics control activities abroad.

(Pub. L. 87–195, pt. I, §126, as added Pub. L. 96–53, title I, §110, Aug. 14, 1979, 93 Stat. 363; amended Pub. L. 99–83, title VI, §603, Aug. 8, 1985, 99 Stat. 228; Pub. L. 101–513, title V, §562(d)(7), Nov. 5, 1990, 104 Stat. 2031.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

1990—Subsec. (b)(1). Pub. L. 101–513 inserted ", and part X of this subchapter," after "this part".

1985—Subsec. (b). Pub. L. 99–83 designated existing provisions as par. (1), inserted reference to part IV of subchapter II of this chapter, and added par. (2).

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### References to Subchapter I Deemed To Include Certain Parts of Subchapter II

References to subchapter I of this chapter are deemed to include parts IV (§2346 et seq.), VI (§2348 et seq.), and VIII (§2349aa et seq.) of subchapter II of this chapter, and references to subchapter II are deemed to exclude such parts. See section 202(b) of Pub. L. 92–226, set out as a note under section 2346 of this title, and sections 2348c and 2349aa–5 of this title.

#### Effective Date of 1985 Amendment

Amendment by Pub. L. 99–83 effective Oct. 1, 1985, see section 1301 of Pub. L. 99–83, set out as a note under section 2151–1 of this title.

#### Effective Date

Section effective Oct. 1, 1979, see section 512(a) of Pub. L. 96–53, set out as an Effective Date of 1979 Amendment note under section 2151 of this title.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY ELEVATION

 238.47

 238.47

 238.47

 238.47

 238.47

 238.47

 238.47

 238.47

 238.47

 238.47

 238.47

 238.47

 238.47

 238.47

 238.47

 238.47

 238.47

 238.47

 238.47

 238.47

 238.47

 238.47

 238.47

 238.47

 238.47

 238.47

 238.47

 238.47

 238.47

 238.47

 238.47

 296

 296

 296

 296

 296

 296

 296

 296

 296

 296

 296

 296

 296

 296

 296

 296

 296

 296

 296

 296

 296

 296

 296

 296

 296

 296

 296

 296

 296

 296

 296

STORAGE

+0

+0

+0

+0

+0

+0

+0

+0

+0

+0

+0

+0

+0

+0

+0

+0

+0

+0

+0

+0

+0

+0

+0

+0

+0

+0

+0

+0

+0

+0

+0

CHANGE

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 100

 214

 257

 257

 280

 273

 256

 126

 160

 157

 162

 0

 0

 0

 0

 143

 140

 144

 175

 4,610

 4,590

 5,130

 4,630

 4,590

 4,590

 4,590

 4,590

 4,590

 4,590

 4,590

 4,610

 4,560

 4,200

 4,300

 4,180

 4,200

 4,180

 4,160

 4,110

 4,060

 4,130

 4,370

 4,330

 6,550

 4,930

 4,470

 4,350

 4,300

 4,250

 4,230

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

JANUARY 2009 RED BLUFF DIVERSION RESERVOIR DAILY OPERATIONS RUN DATE: February 2, 2009

IN LAKE

CANAL

 ACRE-FEET

TOTALS +0 2,844 139,560

ACRE-FEET +0 5,641 276,817

SUMMARY

RELEASE (ACRE-FEET)

TOTAL 282,587

 296

RELEASE

RIVER

CORNING TO SACTO

CANAL

RELEASE C.F.S

TEHAMA

COLUSA

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 35

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 30

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 65

 129

CORNING CANAL 129

TEHAMA-COLUSA CANAL 5,641

TO SACTO RIVER 276,817
### §262s–1. Procurement opportunities for United States firms

The Secretary of the Treasury shall instruct the United States Executive Directors of the multilateral development institutions to take all possible steps to ensure that information relating to potential procurement opportunities for United States firms is expeditiously communicated to the Secretary of the Treasury, the Secretary of State, and the Secretary of Commerce, and is disseminated as widely as possible to large and small businesses.

(Pub. L. 95–118, title XVIII, §1802, as added Pub. L. 101–240, title V, §541(a), Dec. 19, 1989, 103 Stat. 2516.)

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Definitions

The definitions in section 262r of this title apply to this section.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

DAY HIGH

 2,756

 1,536

 1,221

 326

 252

 233

 239

 245

 281

 355

 314

 425

 648

 826

 1,007

 1,051

 947

 687

 537

 459

 394

 481

 572

 1,023

 1,231

 1,773

 2,264

 1,518

 1,335

 1,314

 185

 184

 182

 183

 182

 191

 197

 201

 206

 208

 212

 213

 213

 215

 217

 217

 215

 217

 216

 215

 215

 215

 215

 216

 218

 219

 219

 224

 227

 227

 777

 423

 383

 203

 191

 198

 202

 210

 224

 229

 229

 244

 269

 314

 350

 365

 335

 304

 294

 259

 237

 262

 267

 353

 388

 490

 584

 455

 442

 437

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

NOVEMBER 2008 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: December 5, 2008

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

RIO VISTA ON THE SACRAMENTO RIVER
Editorial Note on Part 416
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 416 appear at 68 FR 53509, Sept. 11, 2003.

§ 416.610 When payment will be made to a representative payee. ( a ) We pay benefits to a representative payee on behalf of a beneficiary 18 years old or older when it appears to us that this method of payment will be in the interest of the beneficiary. We do this if we have information that the beneficiary is— ( 1 ) Legally incompetent or mentally incapable of managing benefit payments; or
( 2 ) Physically incapable of managing or directing the management of his or her benefit payments; or
( 3 ) Eligible for benefits solely on the basis of disability and drug addiction or alcoholism is a contributing factor material to the determination of disability.
( b ) Generally, if a beneficiary is under age 18, we will pay benefits to a representative payee. However, in certain situations, we will make direct payments to a beneficiary under age 18 who shows the ability to manage the benefits. For example, we make direct payment to a beneficiary under age 18 if the beneficiary is— ( 1 ) A parent and files for himself or herself and/or his or her child and he or she has experience in handling his or her own finances; or
( 2 ) Capable of using the benefits to provide for his or her current needs and no qualified payee is available; or
( 3 ) Within 7 months of attaining age 18 and is initially filing an application for benefits.
[47 FR 30475, July 14, 1982, as amended at 54 FR 35483, Aug. 28, 1989; 60 FR 8150, Feb. 10, 1995]
**EXHIBIT31.2**

I, Michael L. Paxton,Chief Financial Officer of Intrusion Inc., certify that:

(1)         Ihave reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of Intrusion Inc.:

(2)         Basedon my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a materialfact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, inlight of the circumstances under which such statements were made, notmisleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

(3)         Basedon my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial informationincluded in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financialcondition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, andfor, the periods presented in this report;

(4)         Theregistrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishingand maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange ActRules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

(a)     Designedsuch disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls andprocedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that materialinformation relating to the registrant, including its consolidatedsubsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularlyduring the period in which this report is being prepared;

(b)    Evaluatedthe effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures andpresented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of thedisclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by thisreport based on such evaluation; and

(c)     Disclosedin this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter thathas materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, theregistrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and

(5)         Theregistrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on ourmost recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to theregistrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board ofdirectors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

(a)     Allsignificant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation ofinternal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely toadversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize andreport financial information; and

(b)    Anyfraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees whohave a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting.
| Date: May 15, 2007 |   | /s/ Michael L. Paxton   |   |   |   |
|--------------------|--------|-------------------------|--------|--------|--------|
|               |   | Michael L. Paxton       |   |   |
|               |   | Chief Financial Officer |   |   |

 

----
§ 345.202 Consolidated employer records. ( a ) *Establishing a consolidated employer record.* Two or more employers that are under common ownership or control may request the Board to consolidate their individual employer records into a joint individual employer record. Such joint individual employer record shall be treated as though it were a single employer record. A request for such consolidation shall be made to the Director of Policy and Systems, and such consolidation shall be effective commencing with the calendar year following the year of the request.
( b ) *Discontinuance of a consolidated employer record.* Two or more employers that have established and maintained a consolidated employer record will be permitted to discontinue such consolidated record only if the individual employers agree to an allocation of the consolidated employer record and such allocation is approved by the Director of Policy and Systems. The discontinuance of the consolidated record shall be effective commencing with the calendar year following the year of the Director of Policy and Systems' approval.
[80 FR 13764, Mar. 17, 2015]
(No. 74-CC-86

#### Frank B. Hall & Co., Claimant, *vs.*State of Illinois, Department of General Services, Respondent.

*Opinion filed December 17, 1973.*

Frank B. Hall & Co., Claimant, pro se.

*179William J. Scott, Attorney General; Saul R. Wexler, Assistant Attorney General, for Respondent.

Per Curiam.
#### City of Buffalo, Respondent, v. Plainfield Hotel Corporation, Appellant, et al., Defendants.

Order affirmed, with $10 costs and disbursements. All concur. (The order denies a motion to vacate the alleged service of a summons and complaint on a foreign corporation.) Present — Taylor, P. J., Harris, McCurn, Larkin and Love, JJ.
§ 228.15 Reduction for age. ( a ) *Widow(er), surviving divorced spouse, or remarried widow(er).* The tier I annuity component is reduced 19 ⁄ 40 of 1 percent multiplied by the number of months before the annuitant attains full retirement age (presently age 65) effective with the annuity beginning date for widow(ers) born before 1/2/40. (For widow(ers) born after 1/1/40, see section 216(l) of the Social Security Act.)
( b ) *Disabled widow(er), disabled surviving divorced spouse, or disabled remarried widow(er).* The tier I annuity component is reduced for a maximum of 60 months even though the annuity may begin at age 50.