alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                                            9
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                          9-MOS 
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                 DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                    JAN-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                      SEP-30-1996
<CASH>                                 99,739
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                 70,692
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                       55,031
<TRADING-ASSETS>                            0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>           992,566
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                689,709
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                  679,590
<LOANS>                             3,468,859
<ALLOWANCE>                            23,596
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                      5,595,612
<DEPOSITS>                          4,364,531
<SHORT-TERM>                          171,735
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                   121,159
<LONG-TERM>                           537,085
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                  29,915
<PREFERRED>                                 0
<COMMON>                                    0
<OTHER-SE>                            371,187
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>      5,595,612
<INTEREST-LOAN>                       227,535
<INTEREST-INVEST>                      85,083
<INTEREST-OTHER>                            0
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                      312,618
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                    149,347
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                    172,610
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                 140,008
<LOAN-LOSSES>                           6,930
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                      2,511
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                       120,759
<INCOME-PRETAX>                        46,324
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>             31,218
<EXTRAORDINARY>                          (686)
<CHANGES>                                   0
<NET-INCOME>                           30,532
<EPS-PRIMARY>                            1.00
<EPS-DILUTED>                            1.00
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                           3.35
<LOANS-NON>                            11,153
<LOANS-PAST>                                0
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                            0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                         7,813
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                       25,235
<CHARGE-OFFS>                           9,427
<RECOVERIES>                              858
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                      23,596
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                        0
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                         0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                23,596
                                  


</TABLE>
§ 345.404 Adjustments. ( a ) *Recovery of benefits charged to base year employer.* Where the Board recovers a benefit payment that it had previously charged, in whole or in part, to one or more base year employers, the Board will subtract the amount of the recovery from the cumulative benefit balances of the employers of the employee to whom such amount was paid as a benefit in proportion to the amount by which each such employer's cumulative benefit balance was increased as a result of the payment of the benefit.
( b ) *Recovery of other benefit payments.* Where the Board recovers a benefit payment that was not charged, in whole or in part, to any base year employer, or was made before January 1, 1990, the Board will treat the amount of the recovery as a subtraction from the system unallocated charge balance.
( c ) *Payment of interest or other debt collection-related charges.* The Board will not adjust a base year employer's cumulative benefit balance to reflect payment by a debtor of interest or other charges assessed by the Board under § 200.7 of this chapter with respect to the collection of a debt arising from a benefit payment charged to such employer and later found to be recoverable by the Board.
( d ) *Limitations.* The Board will adjust a base year employer's cumulative benefit balance only when the Board actually recovers, by cash payment or setoff, a debt that represents a benefit payment that was charged, in whole or in part, to such employer. No adjustment shall be made— ( 1 ) If the Board waives recovery of a debt in accordance with part 340 of this chapter, or
( 2 ) If the Board finds that a debt is uncollectible, or
( 3 ) To the extent of the amount not recovered by the Board by reason of a compromise settlement of a debt.
# C_2016181EN.01009801.xml

| 19.5.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 181/98 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

19.5.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 181/98

---

P7_TA(2013)0391

EU-Ukraine Cooperation Agreement: Civil Global Navigation Satellite System (GNSS) ***

European Parliament legislative resolution of 8 October 2013 on the draft Council decision on the conclusion of the Cooperation Agreement on a Civil Global Navigation Satellite System (GNSS) between the European Community and its Member States and Ukraine (06373/2013 — C7-0070/2013 — 2012/0274(NLE))

(Consent)

(2016/C 181/20)

The European Parliament,

The European Parliament

| — | having regard to the draft Council decision (06373/2013), |
| --- | --- |

—

having regard to the draft Council decision (06373/2013),

| — | having regard to the draft cooperation agreement between the European Union and Ukraine (13242/2005), |
| --- | --- |

—

having regard to the draft cooperation agreement between the European Union and Ukraine (13242/2005),

| — | having regard to the request for consent submitted by the Council in accordance with Article 172 and Article 218(6), second subparagraph, point (a), of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (C7-0070/2013), |
| --- | --- |

—

having regard to the request for consent submitted by the Council in accordance with Article 172 and Article 218(6), second subparagraph, point (a), of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (C7-0070/2013),

| — | having regard to Rules 81, 90(7) and 46(1) of its Rules of Procedure, |
| --- | --- |

—

having regard to Rules 81, 90(7) and 46(1) of its Rules of Procedure,

| — | having regard to the recommendation of the Committee on Industry, Research and Energy (A7-0298/2013), |
| --- | --- |

—

having regard to the recommendation of the Committee on Industry, Research and Energy (A7-0298/2013),

| 1. | Consents to the conclusion of the Agreement; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Consents to the conclusion of the Agreement;

| 2. | Instructs its President to forward its position to the Council, the Commission and the governments and parliaments of the Member States and of Ukraine. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Instructs its President to forward its position to the Council, the Commission and the governments and parliaments of the Member States and of Ukraine.

---
§ 418.3410 Whose resources do we count? ( a ) We count your resources. We count the resources of both you and your spouse regardless of whether one or both of you apply or are eligible for the subsidy if you are married and live with your spouse as of the month for which we determine your eligibility based on an application for a subsidy, as of the month for which we redetermine your eligibility for a subsidy as described in § 418.3125, or as of the month for which we determine your eligibility due to a change you reported as described in § 418.3120.
( b ) We will determine your eligibility based on your resources alone if you are not married or if you are married but you are separated from your spouse at the time you apply for a subsidy or at the time we redetermine your eligibility for a subsidy as described in § 418.3125.
( c ) If your subsidy is based on the resources of you and your spouse and we redetermine your subsidy as described in § 418.3120(b)(1), we will stop counting the resources of your spouse in the month following the month that we receive a report that your marriage ended due to death, divorce, or annulment; or a report that you and your spouse stopped living together.
( d ) If your subsidy is based on the resources of you and your spouse, we will continue counting the resources of both you and your spouse if one of you is temporarily away from home as described in § 404.347 of this chapter.
**Exhibit32.2**

**Certificationof CFO Pursuant to18 U.S.C. Section 1350,as Adopted Pursuant toSection 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**

In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K ofKapStone Paper and Packaging Corporation for the year ended December 31,2006 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “Report”), I,Andrea Tarbox, Chief Financial Officer of KapStone Paper and PackagingCorporation, hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adoptedpursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1)                                  TheReport fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)                                  Theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operations of KapStone Paper andPackaging Corporation.

| Dated: March 13, 2007 |   |                    |
|----------------------------|--------|-------------------------|
|                       |   |                    |
|                       | By:    | /s/ Andrea Tarbox       |
|                       |   | Andrea Tarbox           |
|                       |   | Chief Financial Officer |

 

----
§ 411.585 Can a State VR agency and an EN both receive payment for serving the same beneficiary? Yes. A State VR agency and an EN can both receive payment for serving the same beneficiary, but the ticket can only be assigned to one EN, including a State VR agency acting as an EN, at a time. It also cannot be assigned to an EN and placed in the VR cost reimbursement status at the same time. ( a ) A State VR agency may act as an EN and serve a beneficiary. In this case, both the State VR agency acting as an EN and another EN may be eligible for payment based on the same ticket (see § 411.560).
( b ) If a State VR agency is paid by us under the VR cost reimbursement option, such payment does not preclude payment by us to an EN or to another State VR agency acting as an EN under its elected EN payment system. A subsequent VR agency also may choose to be paid under the VR cost reimbursement option.
( c ) If an EN or a State VR agency acting as an EN is paid by us under one of the EN payment systems, that does not preclude payment by us to a different State VR agency under the VR cost reimbursement option. The subsequent State VR agency also may choose to be paid under its elected EN payment system.
[73 FR 29351, May 20, 2008]
DANNY O. DAVIS

,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA

,

Appellee

. IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO

FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND

DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED

CASE NO. 1D 14

- 1528

_________ ____________________/

Opinion filed July 7, 2014.

An appeal from the Circuit Court for Duval County

. J. Bradford Stetson , Judge

.

Danny Davis, pro se , A ppellant.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee , for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

AFFIR MED.

LEWIS

, C.J., WOLF

, and WETHERELL

, J J

. , CONCUR.
[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 12 (Wednesday, January 19, 2011)]
[Notices]
[Page 3160]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2011-939]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE

Drug Enforcement Administration


Importer of Controlled Substances; Notice of Registration

    By Notice dated May 28, 2010 and published in the Federal Register 
on June 8, 2010, (75 FR 32504), Stepan Company, Natural Products 
Department, 100 W. Hunter Avenue, Maywood, New Jersey 07607, made 
application by renewal to the Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA) to 
be registered as an importer of Coca Leaves (9040), a basic class of 
controlled substance listed in schedule II.
    The company plans to import the listed controlled substance for the 
manufacture of a bulk controlled substance for distribution to its 
customer.
    No comments or objections have been received. DEA has considered 
the factors in 21 U.S.C. 823(a) and 952(a) and determined that the 
registration of Stepan Company to import the basic class of controlled 
substance is consistent with the public interest and with United States 
obligations under international treaties, conventions, or protocols in 
effect on May 1, 1971. DEA has investigated Stepan Company to ensure 
that the company's registration is consistent with the public interest. 
The investigation has included inspection and testing of the company's 
physical security systems, verification of the company's compliance 
with state and local laws, and a review of the company's background and 
history. Therefore, pursuant to 21 U.S.C. 952(a) and 958(a), and in 
accordance with 21 CFR 1301.34, the above named company is granted 
registration as an importer of the basic class of controlled substance 
listed.

    Dated: December 20, 2010.
Joseph T. Rannazzisi,
Deputy Assistant Administrator, Office of Diversion Control, Drug 
Enforcement Administration.
[FR Doc. 2011-939 Filed 1-18-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4410-09-P
###### Editorial Note on Part 416

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 416 appear at 68 FR 53509, Sept. 11, 2003.

#### § 416.909 How long the impairment must last.

Unless your impairment is expected to result in death, it must have lasted or must be expected to last for a continuous period of at least 12 months. We call this the duration requirement.
CENTRAL VALLEY OPERATIONS OFFICE

CHINOOK SALMON REPORT

June 2005

Note: Bold numbers are not verified by DFG

Winter Run Chinook Salmon Estimated Loss (Incidental Take) Spring Run Chinook Salmon Estimated Loss (Incidental Take) 

Daily SWP Daily CVP Daily Combined Season Combined Daily SWP Daily CVP Daily Combined Season Combined Daily 

Tagged* No Tag Tagged* No Tag Tagged* No Tag Tagged* No Tag Tagged No Tag Tagged No Tag Tagged No Tag Tagged No Tag In C

DATE Estimated Estimated Estimated Estimated Estimated Estimated Estimated Estimated Estimated Estimated Estimated Estimated Estimated Estimated Estimated Estimated

Loss Loss Loss Loss Loss Loss Loss Loss Loss Loss Loss Loss Loss Loss Loss Loss

1-Jun-05 0000 0 0 60 1,376 42 70 0 9 42 79 3,470 26,988 3,965 2-Jun-05 0000 0 0 60 1,376 28 56 0 9 28 65 3,498 27,053 3,431 3-Jun-05 0000 0 0 60 1,376 30 98 0 0 30 98 3,528 27,151 3,422 4-Jun-05 0000 0 0 60 1,376 0 42 0 9 0 51 3,528 27,202 3,461 

5-Jun-05 0000 0 0 60 1,376 31 61 0 9 31 70 3,559 27,272 5,231 

6-Jun-05 0000 0 0 60 1,376 56 63 0 0 56 63 3,615 27,335 4,585 7-Jun-05 0000 0 0 60 1,376 0909 0 18 3,615 27,353 5,243 

8-Jun-05 0000 0 0 60 1,376 0000 0 0 3,615 27,353 5,825 

9-Jun-05 0000 0 0 60 1,376 0000 0 0 3,615 27,353 6,484 

10-Jun-05 0000 0 0 60 1,376 0000 0 0 3,615 27,353 6,554 

11-Jun-05 0000 0 0 60 1,376 0008 0 8 3,615 27,361 6,689 

12-Jun-05 0000 0 0 60 1,376 0000 0 0 3,615 27,361 6,807 

13-Jun-05 0000 0 0 60 1,376 0000 0 0 3,615 27,361 6,555 

14-Jun-05 0000 0 0 60 1,376 0000 0 0 3,615 27,361 6,477 

15-Jun-05 0000 0 0 60 1,376 0000 0 0 3,615 27,361 6,379 

16-Jun-05 0000 0 0 60 1,376 0000 0 0 3,615 27,361 5,868 

17-Jun-05 0000 0 0 60 1,376 0000 0 0 3,615 27,361 5,970 

18-Jun-05 0000 0 0 60 1,376 0000 0 0 3,615 27,361 5,968 

19-Jun-05 0000 0 0 60 1,376 0000 0 0 3,615 27,361 5,949 

20-Jun-05 0000 0 0 60 1,376 0000 0 0 3,615 27,361 5,029 21-Jun-05 0000 0 0 60 1,376 0000 0 0 3,615 27,361 1,198 22-Jun-05 0000 0 0 60 1,376 0000 0 0 3,615 27,361 0 23-Jun-05 0000 0 0 60 1,376 0000 0 0 3,615 27,361 7,520 

24-Jun-05 0000 0 0 60 1,376 0000 0 0 3,615 27,361 6,768 

25-Jun-05 0000 0 0 60 1,376 0000 0 0 3,615 27,361 6,616 

26-Jun-05 0000 0 0 60 1,376 0000 0 0 3,615 27,361 6,621 

27-Jun-05 0000 0 0 60 1,376 0000 0 0 3,615 27,361 6,526 

28-Jun-05 0000 0 0 60 1,376 0000 0 0 3,615 27,361 6,570 

29-Jun-05 0000 0 0 60 1,376 0000 0 0 3,615 27,361 6,581 

30-Jun-05 0000 0 0 60 1,376 0000 0 0 3,615 27,361 6,487 

Total 0 0 0 0 0 0 60 1,376 187 399 0 53 187 452 3,615 27,361 164,779 12

Winter Run Incidental Take Levels (Oct 1 thru May 31) Spring Run Incidental Take Levels for Season Combined Total (Oct 1 thru Jun 30)

Banks Tr
#### In the Matter of the Accounting of City Bank Farmers Trust Company, as Cotrustee under the Will of Thomas J. Ronan, Deceased. Mary J. Ronan et al., Appellants-Respondents; City Bank Farmers Trust Company, Individually and as Cotrustee under the Will of Thomas J. Ronan, Deceased, Respondent-Appellant; Elsie T. Ronan, Individually and as Executrix of Arthur R. Ronan, Deceased, et al., Respondents.

In a proceeding for settlement of the intermediate account of a cotrustee of a testamentary trust, and for leave to resign as such cotrustee, order of the Kings County Surrogate’s Court, insofar as appealed from, unanimously affirmed, with $10 costs to respondent-appellant, payable out of the estate. No opinion. Lewis, P. J., Carswell, Johnston, Sneed and Wenzel, JJ., concur. ■
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

DAY HIGH

 108

 90

 91

 88

 90

 90

 90

 89

 90

 77

 77

 74

 75

 87

 86

 77

 70

 68

 65

 68

 95

 68

 72

 69

 77

 72

 68

 68

 68

 61

 84

 82

 84

 83

 84

 86

 86

 86

 77

 71

 71

 72

 72

 73

 71

 70

 68

 62

 62

 64

 65

 66

 67

 67

 68

 68

 68

 67

 59

 60

 90

 86

 87

 84

 86

 88

 88

 87

 83

 73

 73

 73

 74

 78

 74

 72

 69

 64

 64

 66

 69

 67

 68

 68

 70

 70

 68

 68

 63

 60

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

APRIL 2014 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: June 6, 2014

HIGH LOW MEAN

 59.8

 60.1

 61.6

 61.5

 64.0

 66.3

 69.3

 71.1

 70.8

 68.2

 65.3

 64.4

 64.5

 64.7

 63.7

 61.2

 60.9

 60.4

 60.0

 60.0

 59.3

 58.6

 57.9

 58.3

 58.8

 57.1

 57.8

 58.4

 59.0

 59.8

 56.3

 56.2

 56.3

 58.9

 57.6

 60.1

 62.6

 65.2

 66.9

 64.0

 62.3

 60.6

 60.6

 60.7

 59.5

 59.2

 59.3

 58.7

 58.6

 58.0

 57.8

 57.1

 56.6

 56.8

 57.0

 55.8

 56.2

 56.4

 57.1

 57.7

 57.8

 58.0

 58.9

 60.1

 60.6

 62.9

 65.6

 67.9

 68.8

 66.0

 63.7

 62.7

 62.6

 62.9

 61.1

 60.1

 59.9

 59.4

 59.1

 58.9

 58.5

 57.8

 57.2

 57.4

 57.8

 56.5

 56.9

 57.3

 57.9

 58.6

HIGH LOW MEAN

 10.0

 10.1

 10.2

 9.9

 10.0

 9.8

 9.5

 9.2

 9.0

 9.4

 9.6

 9.8

 9.8

 9.7

 9.8

 9.7

 9.7

 9.8

 9.9

 10.0

 10.0

 10.1

 10.2

 10.3

 10.2

 10.1

 10.2

 10.3

 10.4

 9.9

 9.6

 9.7

 9.6

 9.5

 9.4

 9.1

 8.8

 8.4

 8.4

 8.7

 9.1

 9.4

 9.5

 9.3

 9.4

 9.4

 9.5

 9.6

 9.7

 9.8

 9.8

 9.9

 10.1

 10.0

 9.7

 9.9

 10.1

 10.0

 9.7

 9.6

 9.8

 9.9

 9.9

 9.7

 9.7

 9.5

 9.1

 8.8

 8.7

 9.1

 9.4

 9.6

 9.6

 9.6

 9.7

 9.6

 9.6

 9.7

 9.8

 9.9

 9.9

 10.0

 10.1

 10.1

 9.9

 10.0

 10.2

 10.2

 10.0

 9.8

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

RIPON ON THE STANISLAUS RIVER

 ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS WATER TEMPERATURE, DEG DISSOLVED OXYZEN, PPM
§ 404.762 What is acceptable evidence of having a child in my care? What evidence we will ask for depends upon whether the child is living with you or with someone else. You will be asked to give the following evidence: ( a ) If the child is living with you, your signed statement showing that the child is living with you.
( b ) If the child is living with someone else— ( 1 ) Your signed statement showing with whom he or she is living and why he or she is living with someone else. We will also ask when he or she last lived with you and how long this separation will last, and what care and contributions you provide for the child;
( 2 ) The signed statement of the one with whom the child is living showing what care you provide and the sources and amounts of support received for the child. If the child is in an institution, an official there should sign the statement. These statements are preferred evidence. If there is a court order or written agreement showing who has custody of the child, you may be asked to give us a copy; and
( 3 ) If you cannot get the preferred evidence described in paragraph (b)(2) of this section, we will ask for other convincing evidence that the child is in your care.
[43 FR 24795, June 7, 1978, as amended at 73 FR 40967, July 17, 2008]
§ 404.999b Who may be reimbursed. ( a ) The following individuals may be reimbursed for certain travel expenses— ( 1 ) You, when you attend medical examinations upon request in connection with disability determinations; these are medical examinations requested by the State agency or by us when additional medical evidence is necessary to make a disability determination (also referred to as consultative examinations, see § 404.1517);
( 2 ) You, your representative (see § 404.1705 (a) and (b)), and all unsubpoenaed witnesses we or the State agency determines to be reasonably necessary who attend disability hearings; and
( 3 ) You, your representative, and all unsubpoenaed witnesses we determine to be reasonably necessary who attend hearings on any claim for benefits before an administrative law judge.
( b ) Sections 404.999a through 404.999d do not apply to subpoenaed witnesses. They are reimbursed under §§ 404.950(d) and 404.916(b)(1).
[51 FR 8808, Mar. 14, 1986]
#### CLARK EQUIPMENT CO. v. WEEKS, Secretary of Commerce et al.

Nos. 11899, 11900.

United States Court of Appeals District of Columbia Circuit.

Argued Jan. 26, 1954.

Decided Feb. 18, 1954.

Petition for Rehearing Denied Oct. 15, 1954.

Mr. John A. Dienner, Washington, D. C. , with whom Messrs. Francis C. Browne and William E. Schuyler, Jr., Washington, D. C., were on the brief, for appellant.

Mr. E. L. Reynolds, Sol., Washington, D. C., for appellees.

Before EDGERTON, PRETTYMAN, and DANAHER, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

The District Court sustained appellees in refusing to register, as alleged trademarks for appellant’s fork lift trucks, the terms Trucloader and Carloader. The court found that these are generic names of the goods and have not become distinctive of appellant’s goods. We see no reason to disturb these findings. We need not consider whether these “generic names” might some day become distinctive of appellant’s goods and whether, if they did, they would be entitled to registration. During the argument of these appeals it was suggested that “Clark’s Trucloader” and “Clark’s Carloader” might be entitled to registration, but that question is not before us.

Affirmed.