alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 404.353 Child's benefit amounts. ( a ) *General.* Your child's monthly benefit is equal to one-half of the insured person's primary insurance amount if he or she is alive and three-fourths of the primary insurance amount if he or she has died. The amount of your monthly benefit may change as explained in § 404.304.
( b ) *Entitlement to more than one benefit.* If you are entitled to a child's benefit on more than one person's earnings record, you will ordinarily receive only the benefit payable on the record with the highest primary insurance amount. If your benefit before any reduction would be larger on an earnings record with a lower primary insurance amount and no other person entitled to benefits on any earnings record would receive a smaller benefit as a result of your receiving benefits on the record with the lower primary insurance amount, you will receive benefits on that record. See § 404.407(d) for a further explanation. If you are entitled to a child's benefit and to other dependent's or survivor's benefits, you can receive only the highest of the benefits.
[44 FR 34481, June 15, 1979; 44 FR 56691, Oct. 2, 1979, as amended at 48 FR 21928, May 16, 1983; 51 FR 12606, Apr. 14, 1986; 61 FR 38363, July 24, 1996]
(No. 73-CC-97

#### Globe Glass & Trim Company, Claimant, *vs.*State of Illinois, Department of Conservation, Respondent.

*Opinion filed May 8, 1973.*

Cohon, Raizes & Regal, Attorney for Claimant.

William J. Scott, Attorney General; Saul R. Wexler, Assistant Attorney General, for Respondent.

Per Curiam.
#### Joe Doyle BANNING, Petitioner-Appellant, v. UNITED STATES of America.

No. 15171.

United States Court of Appeals Eighth Circuit.

Sept. 15, 1954.

Joe Doyle Banning, pro se.

PER CURIAM.

Petitions to proceed in forma pauperis denied in all respects, etc.
#### Morris Park Estates, Respondent, v. Fanny Fabricant, Appellant. (2 cases.)

Order affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements. No opinion. Present—Ingraham, P. J., Laughlin, Clarke, Scott and Hotchkiss, JJ.
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND
EXCHANGE COMMISSIONWashington, D.C. 20549 FORM 8-K/A CURRENT REPORT
Pursuant to
Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 Date of Report (Date of earliest
event reported): July 15, 2011 CITIZENS, INC.(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter) COLORADO
  
  0-16509
  
  84-0755371(State or other Jurisdiction of Incorporation)
  
  (Commission File Number)
  
  (IRS Employer Identification No.) 400 East Anderson
Lane
Austin, Texas
  
  78752(Address of Principal Executive Offices)
  
  (Zip Code) Registrant’s telephone number,
including area code: (512) 837-7100 Not
Applicable(Former name or former address if changed since last report.) Check the appropriate box below if the
Form 8-K filing is intended to simultaneously satisfy the filing obligation of
the registrant under any of the following provisions: o Written
communications pursuant to Rule 425 under the Securities Act (17 CFR
230.425)o Soliciting material pursuant
to Rule 14a-12 under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.14a-12)o Pre-commencement communications pursuant to Rule
14d-2(b) under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.14d-2(b))o Pre-commencement communications pursuant to Rule
13e-4(c) under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.13e-4(c))
  1




---



##### 



SECTION 8  OTHER EVENTS
 Item 8.01 Other Events.
   1




---



##### 



SIGNATURE
  CITIZENS, INCBy:
    /s/ Rick D. RileyRick D. Riley, Vice Chairman andPresident   2
(No. 73-CC-101

#### Desaulniers and Company, Claimant, *vs.*State of Illinois, Superintendent of Public Instruction, Respondent.

*Opinion filed September 17, 1973.*

Desaulniers and Company, Claimant, pro se.

William J. Scott, Attorney General; William E. Webber, Assistant Attorney General, for Respondent.

Per Curiam.
Exhibit 31.4

CERTIFICATIONS

I, Bruce E. Thomas, certify that:

1. I have
reviewed this Amendment No. 1 to Annual Report on Form 10-K/A for the year ended December 31, 2012 of Community Bankers Trust Corporation; and

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under
which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report.



/s/    Bruce E. ThomasBruce E. Thomas Senior Vice
President and Chief Financial Officer


Date: April 30, 2013
#### Theodore Young, Appellant, v. State of New York, Respondent.

(Motion No. 1344.)

—Appeal by claimant from an order of the Court of Claims entered December 2, 1947, denying a motion for leave to file a claim pursuant to subdivision 5 of section 10 of the Court of Claims Act (L. 1939, eh. 860). The claimant seeks damages for personal injuries sustained on August 30, 1946. He received a compensation award against his employer and insurance carrier on July 21, 1947. This application was filed October 7, 1947, more than one year after the date of the injury. On its face, therefore, the cause of action, if any, has passed to the employer’s insurance carrier pursuant to section 29 of the Workmen’s Compensation Law, and if nothing more appeared the court would have properly denied permission to file the claim. *(Taylor*v. *New York*
      *987
      *Central B. B. Co.,*294 N. Y. 397, motion for reargument denied 294 N. Y. 977, certiorari denied 326 U. S. 786.) However, the claimant contends that this short Statute of Limitations is tolled by the operation of section 115 of the Workmen’s Compensation Law which provides: “No limitation of time provided in this chapter shall run as against any person who is mentally incompetent or a minor so long as he has no committee or guardian.” Whether or not the claimant was “mentally incompetent” within the intent and meaning of this action, and if so, for how long a period of time, presents questions of fact which should not be disposed of except by trial. For this reason only the order denying claimant-appellant’s motion to file a claim should be reversed. Order denying claimant-appellant’s motion to file a claim reversed, on the law and facts, and permission to file such claim granted, with $10 costs and disbursements. Such claim shall be filed within twenty days after the entry of the order hereon. Hill, P. J., Heffernan, Brewster, Bussell and Deyo, JJ., concur. [190 Mise. 711.]
#### In the Matter of Angelo Valerio et al., Doing Business as Valerio *&*Company, Appellants, for an order to Stay Arbitration Proceedings by Henry Velardi, Respondent.

Ho opinion. Present ■—■ Martin, P. J., Townley, Dore, Cohn and Callahan, JJ.
(No. 74-CC-159

#### Memorial Hospital, Claimant, *vs.*State of Illinois, Department of Mental Health, Respondent.

*Opinion filed December 12, 1973.*

Memorial Hospital, Claimant, pro se.

William J. Scott, Attorney General; William E. Webber, Assistant Attorney General, for Respondent.

Per Curiam.
AFS-16-12329-E 

June 23, 2016 

 Exemption No. 10177F 

 Regulatory Docket No. FAA-2010-0970 

Ms. Susana Castro 

Director of Safety & Regulatory Compliance 

Seaborne Virgin Islands, Inc. 

d.b.a. Seaborne Airlines 

268 Munoz Rivera Avenue, 9th Floor 

Hato Rey, Puerto Rico 00918 

Dear Ms. Castro: 

This letter is to inform you that we have granted your petition to extend Exemption 

No. 10177, as amended. It explains the basis for our decision, describes its effect, and lists 

the conditions and limitations. 

The Basis for Our Decision 

By letter dated May 25, 2016, you petitioned the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) on 

behalf of Seaborne Virgin Islands, Inc., d.b.a. Seaborne Airlines (Seaborne Airlines) for an 

extension of Exemption No. 10177, as amended. That exemption from part 121, appendix K, 

paragraph 5a of Title 14, Code of Federal Regulations (14 CFR) allows Seaborne Airlines to 

continue to operate DHC-6-300 float-equipped airplanes without meeting certain aircraft 

performance requirements. 

In your petition, you indicate that there has been no change in the conditions and reasons 

relative to public interest and safety that were the basis for granting the original exemption. 

The FAA has determined that good cause exists for not publishing a summary of the petition 

in the Federal Register because the requested extension of the exemption would not set a 

precedent, and any delay in acting on this petition would be detrimental to Seaborne Airlines. 
 2

Our Decision 

The FAA has determined that the justification for the issuance of Exemption No. 10177, as 

amended, remains valid with respect to this exemption and is in the public interest. 

Therefore, under the authority provided by 49 U.S.C. §§ 106(f), 40113, and 44701, which the 

FAA Administrator has delegated to me, Seaborne Virgin Islands, Inc., d.b.a. Seaborne 

Airlines is granted an extension to its exemption which allows Seaborne Airlines to continue 

to operate DHC-6-300 float-equipped airplanes without meeting certain aircraft performance 

requirements, subject to the following conditions and limitations. 

Conditions and Limitations 

1. Before conducting operations under this exemption, Seaborne Airlines must obtain an 

updated operations specifications A005 (Exemptions and Deviations) that provides for 

operations under this exemption. 

2. Seaborne Airlines must keep the checklist of ‘takeoff area cleared’ in their float plane 

normal checklist. 

3. Seaborne Airlines must maintain single engine operations instructions for its pilots. 

This exemption terminates on June 30, 2018, unless sooner superseded or rescinded. 

Sincerely, 

/s/ 

John Barbagallo 

Deputy Director, Flight Standards Service
§ 404.631 Statements filed with the Railroad Retirement Board. A written statement filed with the Railroad Retirement Board will be considered a written statement filed with us under the rules in § 404.630 if— ( a ) The statement indicates an intent to claim any payments under the Railroad Retirement Act;
( b ) It bears the signature of the person filing the statement;
( c ) No application is filed with the Railroad Retirement Board on one of its forms. If an application has been filed, we will use the date of filing of that application as determined by the Railroad Retirement Board (see § 404.614(b)(3)); and
( d ) The statement is sent to us by the Railroad Retirement Board.
EXHIBIT 32

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of MWI Veterinary Supply, Inc. (the "Company") for the period ended
September 30, 2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), we, James F. Cleary, Jr., President and Chief Financial Officer, and Mary Patricia B.
Thompson, Senior Vice President of Finance and Administration, Chief Financial Officer, respectively, of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to our knowledge:



November 21,
2007

|/s/JAMES F. CLEARY, JR.James F. Cleary, Jr. President and Chief Executive
Officer                                                  |  | 
|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- |  | 
|/s/MARY PATRICIA B. THOMPSONMary Patricia B. Thompson Senior Vice President of Finance and
Administration, Chief Financial Officer |  | 

---
§ 418.1205 What is a major life-changing event? For the purposes of this subpart, we will consider the following to be major life-changing events: ( a ) Your spouse dies;
( b ) You marry;
( c ) Your marriage ends through divorce or annulment;
( d ) You or your spouse stop working or reduce the hours you work;
( e ) You or your spouse experiences a loss of income-producing property, provided the loss is not at the direction of you or your spouse (e.g., due to the sale or transfer of the property) and is not a result of the ordinary risk of investment. Examples of the type of property loss include, but are not limited to: Loss of real property within a Presidentially or Gubernatorially-declared disaster area, destruction of livestock or crops by natural disaster or disease, loss from real property due to arson, or loss of investment property as a result of fraud or theft due to a criminal act by a third party;
( f ) You or your spouse experiences a scheduled cessation, termination, or reorganization of an employer's pension plan;
( g ) You or your spouse receives a settlement from an employer or former employer because of the employer's closure, bankruptcy, or reorganization.
[71 FR 62931, Oct. 27, 2006, as amended at 75 FR 41086, July 15, 2010]
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY HIGH

 10,908

 10,637

 9,702

 8,774

 8,143

 8,072

 8,511

 9,563

 12,011

 12,455

 14,301

 14,144

 15,272

 13,355

 12,354

 11,454

 9,910

 8,631

 9,448

 9,137

 9,655

 9,947

 10,934

 10,215

 9,312

 10,144

 10,822

 10,815

 10,182

 9,066

 9,008

 2,732

 2,507

 2,618

 2,565

 1,990

 2,119

 2,635

 2,575

 2,545

 2,404

 2,591

 3,187

 3,060

 3,236

 3,018

 2,835

 2,732

 2,381

 3,279

 3,539

 3,319

 3,122

 2,664

 2,587

 2,442

 2,622

 2,595

 2,689

 2,551

 2,440

 2,482

 6,751

 6,545

 6,482

 6,053

 4,743

 4,444

 4,681

 5,373

 5,861

 6,374

 7,095

 7,825

 7,821

 7,709

 7,534

 6,983

 6,318

 5,587

 5,904

 5,822

 6,025

 6,026

 5,888

 5,849

 5,640

 6,059

 6,359

 6,205

 5,916

 5,501

 5,452

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

JULY 2018 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: August 2, 2018

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

PITTSBURG TOP ON THE SACRAMENTO RIVER
Third District Court of Appeal

State of Florida

Opinion filed March 28, 2018.

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.

________________

No. 3D18-373

Lower Tribunal No. 17-21313

________________

Emerson Perozo,

Petitioner,

vs.

The State of Florida,

Respondent.

A Case of Original Jurisdiction – Mandamus.

Carlos J. Martinez, Public Defender, and Jeffrey Paul DeSousa, Assistant

Public Defender, for petitioner.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, and Magaly Rodriguez, Assistant

Attorney General, for respondent.

Before ROTHENBERG, C.J., and SALTER and LOGUE, JJ.

ROTHENBERG, C.J.

The petitioner, Emerson Perozo, seeks mandamus relief instructing the trial
court to accept his written waiver of appearance at any pretrial conference. See

Fla. R. Crim. P. 3.180(a)(3) (“In all prosecutions for crime the defendant shall be

present . . . at any pretrial conference, unless waived by the defendant in

writing[.]”); 3.220(o)(1) (“The trial court may hold 1 or more pretrial conferences,

with trial counsel present, to consider such matters as will promote a fair and

expeditious trial. The defendant shall be present unless the defendant waives this in

writing.”). Because no good cause has been shown to override the defendant’s

waiver, we grant the petition for writ of mandamus and instruct the trial court to

accept the petitioner’s written waiver of appearance. See Charlemagne v. Guevara,

183 So. 3d 1261, 1263 (Fla. 3d DCA 2016) (“[I]f there is a good reason to do so, a

trial court may require the presence of the defendant in court even when the

defendant has filed a written waiver [of appearance at pretrial conferences].”)

(citing Cruz v. State, 822 So. 2d 595 (Fla. 3d DCA 2002)).

Petition granted; writ of mandamus issued.

2
Exhibit 32.1

Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350,

As Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended November 30, 2008 (the
Report) of Immucor, Inc. (the Registrant), as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, I certify, to the best of my knowledge, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Registrant.



|                |  |  |  |                                                  
|--------------- |  |  |  | -------------------------------------------------
|                |  |  |  |                                                  
|                |  | 
|January 8, 2009 |  |  |  | /s/ Dr. Gioacchino De Chirico                    
|                |  |  |  | Dr. Gioacchino De Chirico Chief Executive
Officer
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>    5
<LEGEND>        THE SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION
                EXTRACTED FROM THE CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE
                SHEET AT DECEMBER 31, 1995 (Unaudited) AND THE CONDENSED
                CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF INCOME FOR THE SIX MONTHS
       
<S>                                      <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                            6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                                           JUN-30-1996
<PERIOD-START>                                              JUL-01-1995
<PERIOD-END>                                                DEC-31-1995
<CASH>                                                          369,235
<SECURITIES>                                                  1,237,599
<RECEIVABLES>                                                 1,738,459
<ALLOWANCES>                                                    206,856
<INVENTORY>                                                           0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                              3,469,694
<PP&E>                                                        2,296,174
<DEPRECIATION>                                                  827,807
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                                6,478,251
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                           469,251
<BONDS>                                                          72,542
<COMMON>                                                         47,820
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                                 0
<PREFERRED>                                                           0
<OTHER-SE>                                                    5,888,638
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                                  6,478,251
<SALES>                                                               0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                              2,760,996
<CGS>                                                                 0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                                         0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                              1,858,277
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                                 70,000
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                                3,673
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                                 919,140
<INCOME-TAX>                                                    361,507
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                             557,633
<DISCONTINUED>                                                        0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                                       0
<CHANGES>                                                             0
<NET-INCOME>                                                    557,633
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                                       .12
<EPS-DILUTED>                                                       .12
        

</TABLE>
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

DAY HIGH

 13,586

 14,932

 14,422

 15,149

 15,456

 15,674

 15,046

 14,964

 14,263

 13,468

 12,569

 12,851

 12,713

 13,134

 13,637

 12,798

 12,767

 12,843

 12,382

 10,754

 12,782

 12,811

 12,278

 12,276

 12,378

 12,151

 13,214

 14,291

 13,562

 15,216

 4,269

 5,443

 5,775

 5,629

 5,671

 5,168

 4,700

 4,661

 4,843

 4,818

 4,848

 5,164

 5,262

 5,287

 4,989

 4,750

 3,965

 3,837

 3,656

 2,639

 4,263

 4,812

 4,944

 5,236

 5,601

 5,889

 5,370

 6,209

 5,989

 5,600

 8,612

 9,132

 9,749

 9,904

 10,044

 9,430

 8,872

 9,015

 8,880

 8,730

 8,606

 8,651

 8,402

 8,189

 8,534

 7,976

 7,596

 7,674

 7,245

 6,891

 8,529

 8,659

 8,593

 8,490

 8,732

 8,634

 9,026

 9,960

 9,236

 9,696

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

SEPTEMBER 2018 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: October 4, 2018

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

PITTSBURG BOTTOM ON THE SACRAMENTO RIVER
_______________________________________ __ 

# Order Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan

January 30, 2006 Clifford W. Taylor, Chief Justice 129430 & (59) Michael F. Cavanagh
Elizabeth A. Weaver Marilyn Kelly Maura D. Corrigan VILLAGE OF HOLLY and DOWNTOWN DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY OF THE VILLAGE OF HOLLY, Plaintiffs-Appellees, Robert P. Young, Jr. Stephen J. Markman,
Justices

v SC: 129430 COA: 254379 Oakland CC: 2002-045928-CZ HOLLY TOWNSHIP and HOLLY TOWNSHIP TREASURER, Defendants-Appellants.

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Court, th e motion to file brief amicus curiae is GRANTED. The application for leave to appeal the July 26, 2005 judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the question presented should be reviewed by this Court.

s0123 I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

January 30, 2006

Clerk
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY HIGH

 213

 211

 215

 208

 197

 188

 188

 194

 197

 215

 223

 233

 230

 229

 232

 230

 230

 221

 223

 226

 239

 230

 233

 222

 236

 241

 246

 253

 239

 231

 223

 134

 155

 139

 149

 141

 156

 147

 152

 161

 165

 168

 173

 175

 181

 183

 188

 192

 192

 189

 195

 195

 198

 200

 196

 189

 189

 190

 195

 203

 202

 199

 177

 178

 177

 177

 172

 169

 168

 169

 175

 184

 188

 194

 196

 196

 198

 202

 203

 202

 203

 206

 211

 210

 209

 204

 203

 203

 206

 215

 216

 212

 207

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

MARCH 2007 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: April 19, 2007

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

RIO VISTA ON THE SACRAMENTO RIVER