alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit








Exhibit 10.25


Executive Compensation Notification
Chief Financial Officer




Fiscal 2019 Compensation Program of Chief Financial Officer


Fiscal 2019 Base Salary and Other Compensation: The table below sets forth the fiscal 2019 base salary and bonus for Mr. Wheat.


	
							
	 
	 
	 
	 
	Annual Base Salary
	 
	Discretionary Bonus

	Name 
	 
	Office 
	 
	Fiscal 2019
	 
	Fiscal 2019

	Bill W. Wheat
	 
	Executive Vice President and CFO
	 
	$500,000
	 
	See Below






Discretionary Bonus and Other Long-Term Benefits:  The Board of Directors may award discretionary bonuses to Mr. Wheat based on his performance in fiscal 2019. In addition, Mr. Wheat may participate in two separate deferred compensation plans. The first plan allows the executive to make voluntary income deferrals. The second plan is a promise by the Company to pay benefits to the executive. If the executive is employed by the Company on the last day of the fiscal year (for example September 30, 2019), then the Company will establish a liability equal to 10% of his annual base salary as of the first day of the fiscal year (for example October 1, 2018). This liability will accrue earnings in future years at a rate established by the administrative committee.


Performance Restricted Stock Units: On November 6, 2018, the Compensation Committee approved an award of performance restricted stock units (“Performance RSUs”) pursuant to the Company's 2006 Stock Incentive Plan, as amended and restated ("2006 Plan"), to Mr. Wheat in the following amount:
	
					
	Name 
	 
	Office 
	 
	Target Number of Performance
Restricted Stock Units

	Bill W. Wheat
	 
	Executive Vice President and CFO
	 
	30,000






The Performance RSUs relate to a three-year performance period beginning on October 1, 2018 and ending on September 30, 2021 (the “2021 Performance Period”). The Performance RSUs will vest if four performance goals are satisfied. The four performance goals are relative total shareholder return (“TSR”), relative return on investment (“ROI”), relative selling, general and administrative expense containment (“SG&A”) and relative gross profit (“GP”) (collectively, the “Performance Goals”). Each Performance Goal is weighted twenty-five percent (25%) of the target number of Performance RSUs. The target number of Performance RSUs may be increased to a maximum number of 60,000 for Mr. Wheat upon maximum achievement of each of the four Performance Goals and decreased to a minimum number of zero upon minimum achievement of each of the four Performance Goals based on relative performance to the Company's peer group or the S&P 500 Index TSR, as applicable.
Table 3.4U. Personal Current Tax Receipts

[Millions of dollars; quarters seasonally adjusted at annual rates]

Bureau of Economic Analysis Dow nloaded on 5/27/2011 At 2:17:50 PM Last Revised May 27, 2011 1 2 3 4 5 6 Line 2009-I 2009-II 2009-III 2009-IV 2010-I 1 Personal current taxes\1\ 1213415 1112459 1116996 1117230 1134699 2Federal 912832 847740 826968 823424 843232 3Income taxes 912832 847740 826968 823424 843232 4Withheld 868632 823440 816572 820540 837908 5Declarations and settlements 319840 299940 286036 278524 256628 6Less: Refunds 275640 275640 275640 275640 251304 7Other taxes 0 0 0 0 0 8State and local 300583 264719 290028 293806 291467 9Income taxes 272799 236755 261823 264951 262520 10Motor vehicle licenses 15172 15285 15390 15977 15942 11 Property taxes 7249 7339 7405 7447 7549 12Other taxes\2\ 5363 5340 5410 5431 5456

1. Excludes estate and gift taxes, which are classified in the NIPAs as capital transfers. 2. Consists largely of hunting, fishing, and other personal licenses.Table 3.4U. Personal Current Tax Receipts [Millions of dollars; quarters seasonally adjusted at annual rates]

7 8 9 2010-II 2010-III 2010-IV 1149124 1178199 1203180 868504 886368 900208 868504 886368 900208 864244 882696 895172 255564 254976 256340 251304 251304 251304 0 0 0 280620 291831 302972 251258 262860 273822 16161 15651 15540 7664 7798 7908 5537 5522 5702
§ 408.933 When will we begin cross-program recovery from your current monthly benefits? ( a ) We will begin collecting the overpayment balance by cross-program recovery from your title II and title XVI current monthly benefits no sooner than 30 calendar days after the date of the notice described in § 408.932. If within that 30-day period you pay us the full overpayment balance stated in the notice, we will not begin cross-program recovery from your current monthly benefits.
( b ) If within that 30-day period you ask us to review our determination that you still owe us this overpayment balance, we will not begin cross-program recovery from your current monthly benefits before we review the matter and notify you of our decision in writing.
( c ) If within that 30-day period you ask us to withhold a different amount than the amount stated in the notice, we will not begin cross-program recovery from your current monthly benefits until we determine the amount we will withhold. This paragraph does not apply when § 408.931(d) applies.
( d ) If within that 30-day period you ask us to waive recovery of the overpayment balance, we will not begin cross-program recovery from your current monthly benefits before we review the matter and notify you of our decision in writing. See §§ 408.910 through 408.914.
[70 FR 16, Jan. 3, 2005]
### §2661a. Foreign contracts or arrangements; discrimination

Information should not be disseminated about opportunities for, and there should be no participation or other assistance by any officer or employee of the Department of State (including the Agency for International Development) in, the negotiation of any contract or arrangement with a foreign country, individual, or entity, if—

(1) any United States person (as defined in section 7701(a)(30) of title 26) is prohibited from entering into such contract or arrangement, or

(2) such contract or arrangement requires that any such person be excluded from participating in the implementation of such contract or arrangement,

on account of the race, religion, national origin, or sex of such person in the case of an individual or, in the case of a partnership, corporation, association, or other entity, any officer, employee, agent, director, or owner thereof.

(Pub. L. 94–350, title I, §121, July 12, 1976, 90 Stat. 829; Pub. L. 99–514, §2, Oct. 22, 1986, 100 Stat. 2095.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

1986—Par. (1). Pub. L. 99–514 substituted "Internal Revenue Code of 1986" for "Internal Revenue Code of 1954", which for purposes of codification was translated as "title 26" thus requiring no change in text.
# AL Jf 

# n tbe Wniteb**~tates ~ourt**  

# ofjf 

# eberal**~Iaittt5** No. 15-1556C (Filed May 5, 2017) NOT FOR PUBLICATION 

### * * * * * * * * 

### * * 

### * * * * * * 

### * * * 

### * * * 

### * * * 

## * BEATRICE ROBINSON,
Plaintiff,

v. 

### THE UNITED STATES, 

## * * * 

## * * * 

## * * * Def e ndant. 

## * 

## * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * 

### * * * * * * * 

### * * 

### * *
ORDER 

# FILED MAY
- 

## 5 2017 U.S. COURT OF FEDERAL CLAIMS

Plaintiff, Beatrice Robinson, filed a comp l aint in our court contending that the Department of Education (Department) was improperly garnishing h er social security disability benefits to satisfy a student loan which had b een discharge d due to disability. Comp l. 

### ir 2. In response to the comp laint , and after some form s were received and processed, the D epartment refunded to Ms. Robinson the money it had offset from h er benefits and ceased the garnishment. D e f.'s Mot. to Dismiss (Def.'s Mot.) Exs. A-B. As this remedial action mooted plaintiff's claim, defendant moved for the dismissal of the complaint. D ef.'s Mot. at 1. Plaintiff**acknowl~dges** that she h as received the relie f she sought , but opposes the government's motion to dismiss because she claims she is a "prevailing party" entitled to the reimbursement of her $400 filing fee. Pl.'s Resp. to Def .'s Mot. at 1. Unfortunately for plaintiff, as both the Federal Circuit and t he Supre me Court have made clear, a party who obtains a ll the relief it seeks b ecause the government voluntarily agrees to provide the relief requested, without the involvement of the court, is not a prevailing party within the meaning of the Equal Access to Justice Act, 28 U.S.C. § 2412. 

### Bucl?-hannon Bd

. & 

### Care Home, Inc

. v. W. Virginia Dep't of Health & 

### Human Res., 532 U.S. 598, 610 (2001); 

### Brickwood Contractors, Inc. v. United States, 288 F.3d 1371, 1380 (Fed. Cir. 2002); 

### Rice Servs ., Ltd. v. United States, 405 F.3d 1017, 10 27 (Fe d. Cir. 2005 ); 

### Dellew Corp. v. United States, No. 2016-2304 , 2017 WL 1541520, at *3 (Fed

. Cir. May 1, 2017). As this

### Court may only tax costs when a plaintiff is a prevailing party, 

### U.S. ex rel

. Long v. GSDMidea City, L

. L.C., 807 F.3d 125 , 129 (5th Cir. 2015); 

### see also 28 U.S

. C. 

### § 2412(a)(l) & 

### 28 U.S.C. 

### § 1920(1 ), plaintiff cannot be awarded th e fee s h e seeks.t As plaintiff has obtained a ll other relief she sought, her complaint is moot. 

### See Technical Inno vation, Inc. v. United States, 93 Fed. Cl. 276 (2010). Accordingly, the defendant's motion to dismiss the case is 

### GRANTED. The Clerk is directed to close t he case. IT IS SO 

### ORDERED.

# ~4i**~** Judge

t As p l aintiff cannot b e awarded the only relief she seeks, there is no reason to stay this case while she seeks an attorney. Accordingly, her motion for a continuance is 

### DENIED .

- 2
-
### §277c. Agreements with political subdivisions; acquisition of lands

In order to carry out the provisions of sections 277 to 277d of this title, the President, or any Federal agency he may designate is authorized, (a) in his discretion, to enter into agreements with any one or more of said political subdivisions, in connection with the construction of any project or works provided for in paragraph (2) of section 277a and section 277b of this title, under the terms of which agreements there shall be furnished to the United States, gratuitously, except for the examination and approval of titles, the lands or easements in lands necessary for the construction, operation, and maintenance in whole or in part of any such project or works, or for the assumption by one or more of any such political subdivisions making such agreement, of the operation and maintenance of such project or works in whole or in part upon the completion thereof: Provided, however, That when an agreement is reached that necessary lands or easements shall be provided by any such political subdivision and for the future operation and maintenance by it of a project or works or a part thereof, in the discretion of the President the title to such lands and easements for such projects or works need not be required to be conveyed to the United States but may be required only to be vested in and remain in such political subdivision; (b) to acquire by purchase, exercise of the power of eminent domain, or by donation, any real or personal property which may be necessary; (c) 1 to withdraw from sale, public entry or disposal of such public lands of the United States as he may find to be necessary and thereupon the Secretary of the Interior shall cause the lands so designated to be withdrawn from any public entry whatsoever, and from sale, disposal, location or settlement under the mining laws or any other law relating to the public domain and shall cause such withdrawal to appear upon the records in the appropriate land office having jurisdiction over such lands, and such lands may be used for carrying out the purposes of sections 277 to 277d of this title: Provided, That any such withdrawal may subsequently be revoked by the President; and (d) to make or approve all necessary rules and regulations.

(May 13, 1924, ch. 153, §4, as added Aug. 19, 1935, ch. 561, 49 Stat. 660; amended May 22, 1936, ch. 447, 49 Stat. 1370.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

1936—Act May 22, 1936, inserted "paragraph (2) of section 277a".

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Repeal; Savings Provision

Clause (c), except the proviso thereof, repealed by Pub. L. 94–579, title VII, §704(a), Oct. 21, 1976, 90 Stat. 2792, effective on and after Oct. 21, 1976. Such repeal not to be construed as terminating any valid lease, permit, patent, etc., existing on Oct. 21, 1976, see section 701 of Pub. L. 94–579, set out as a note under section 1701 of Title 43, Public Lands.

1 See Repeal; Savings Provision note below.
EXHIBIT 32.2

CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTING OFFICER PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE

SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF
2002

The undersigned hereby certifies that the annual report on Form 10-KSB/A of Oakmont Acquisition Corporation (the Registrant) for the
year ended December 31, 2005, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act
of 1934, as amended, and that the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Registrant.

Date: June 14, 2007



/s/ Michael C. AzarMichael C. AzarPresident, Secretary, Principal Accounting Officer and Director
Editorial Note on Part 416
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 416 appear at 68 FR 53509, Sept. 11, 2003.

§ 416.1438 Notice of a hearing before an administrative law judge. Cross Reference
Link to an amendment published at 89 FR 68363 , Aug. 26, 2024.
( a ) *Issuing the notice.* After we set the time and place of the hearing, we will mail notice of the hearing to you at your last known address, or give the notice to you by personal service, unless you have indicated in writing that you do not wish to receive this notice. We will mail or serve the notice at least 75 days before the date of the hearing.
( b ) *Notice information.* The notice of hearing will tell you: ( 1 ) The specific issues to be decided in your case;
( 2 ) That you may designate a person to represent you during the proceedings;
( 3 ) How to request that we change the time or place of your hearing;
( 4 ) That your hearing may be dismissed if neither you nor the person you designate to act as your representative appears at your scheduled hearing without good reason under § 416.1457;
( 5 ) Whether your appearance or that of any other party or witness is scheduled to be made by video teleconferencing, in person, or, when the circumstances described in § 416.1436(c)(2) exist, by telephone. If we have scheduled you to appear by video teleconferencing, the notice of hearing will tell you that the scheduled place for the hearing is a video teleconferencing site and explain what it means to appear at your hearing by video teleconferencing;
( 6 ) That you must make every effort to inform us about or submit all written evidence that is not already in the record no later than 5 business days before the date of the scheduled hearing, unless you show that your circumstances meet the conditions described in § 416.1435(b); and
( 7 ) Any other information about the scheduling and conduct of your hearing.
( c ) *Acknowledging the notice of hearing.* The notice of hearing will ask you to return a form to let us know that you received the notice. If you or your representative do not acknowledge receipt of the notice of hearing, we will attempt to contact you for an explanation. If you tell us that you did not receive the notice of hearing, an amended notice will be sent to you by certified mail.
( d ) *Amended notice of hearing or notice of supplemental hearing.* If we need to send you an amended notice of hearing, we will mail or serve the notice at least 20 days before the date of the hearing. Similarly, if we schedule a supplemental hearing, after the initial hearing was continued by the assigned administrative law judge, we will mail or serve a notice of hearing at least 20 days before the date of the hearing.
[68 FR 5220, Feb. 3, 2003, as amended at 75 FR 39161, July 8, 2010; 78 FR 29628, May 21, 2013; 79 FR 35934, June 25, 2014; 81 FR 90995, Dec. 16, 2016; 84 FR 69308, Dec. 18, 2019]
**Exhibit 32.2**

**CertificationPursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350,**

**AsAdopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Qfor the period ended February 28, 2007 (the “Report”) of Immucor, Inc. (the “Registrant”),as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, Icertify, to the best of my knowledge, that:

(1)       The Report fully complies with therequirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934,as amended; and

(2)       The information contained in the Reportfairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and resultsof operations of the Registrant.

 
| April 5, 2007 | /s/ Patrick D. Waddy                                   |
|---------------|--------------------------------------------------------|
|          | Patrick D. Waddy                                       |
|          | Chief Financial Officer (Principal Financial  Officer) |

 

----
* This order and judgment is not binding precedent, except under the doctrines of

law of the case, res judicata, and collateral estoppel. This court generally disfavors the

citation of orders and judgments; nevertheless, an order and judgment may be cited under

the terms and conditions of 10th Cir. R. 36.3.

** After examining the briefs and the appellate record, this three-judge panel has

determined unanimously that oral argument would not be of material assistance in the

determination of this appeal. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a); 10th Cir. R. 34.1.9. The cause is

therefore ordered submitted without oral argument.

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

Filed 7/29/96

TENTH CIRCUIT

REGINALD KEITH LONG,

Petitioner - Appellant,

vs.

RONALD CHAMPION, and

ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE

STATE OF OKLAHOMA,

Respondents - Appellees.

No. 95-5234

(D.C. No. 94-C-170-BU)

(N.D. Okla.)

ORDER AND JUDGMENT*

Before SEYMOUR, Chief Judge, KELLY and LUCERO, Circuit Judges.**

Mr. Long, an inmate appearing pro se and in forma pauperis, seeks a certificate of

probable cause and to appeal the district court’s denial of his habeas corpus petition. 

Although he raised fourteen grounds in his petition, on appeal he raises two grounds--

that he was denied due process and equal protection because his sentence of life without
- 2 -

parole was imposed without conducting a sentencing proceeding as required by Okla.

Stat. Ann. tit. 21, §§ 701.7 and 701.10, and that he received ineffective assistance of

counsel because his counsel failed to advise him that he was supposed to have a

sentencing proceeding. See Aplt. Br. at 2 (Form A-11); R. doc. 1 at 10-C & 10-E. These

grounds were included in a second state post-conviction application and were denied by

the Oklahoma Court of Criminal Appeals based upon the failure to raise them in the first

state post-conviction proceeding. R. doc. 12 ex. B (citing Okla. Stat. Ann. tit. 22, §

1991).

We construe Mr. Long’s application for a certificate of probable cause as an

application for a certificate of appealability now required by 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2). See

Lennox v. Evans, No. 96-6041, 1996 WL 343632 at *4 (10th Cir. June 24, 1996). The

Application is DENIED for want of “a substantial showing of the denial of a

constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2). In addition to the problem of procedural

bar and lack of a showing of cause and prejudice, or factual innocence, Mr. Long has not

overcome the transcript of the plea hearing that reflects a knowing and voluntary plea to

life without parole based upon competent advice. See R. doc. 9 ex. B.

APPEAL DISMISSED.

Entered for the Court

Paul J. Kelly, Jr.

Circuit Judge
#### § 408.1060 What happens if a Federal Court remands your case to the Commissioner?

For purposes of this part, we use the same rules on court remand cases that we use in the title XVI program (see §§ 416.1483-416.1485 of this chapter).
§ 9.109 Northern Neck George Washington Birthplace. ( a ) *Name.* The name of the viticultural area described in this section is “Northern Neck George Washington Birthplace.”
( b ) *Approved maps.* The appropriate maps for determining the boundaries of the Northern Neck George Washington Birthplace viticultural area are 2 U.S.G.S. 1:250,000 scale maps. They are entitled: ( 1 ) Washington, DC; Maryland; Virginia, 1957 (Revised 1979); and
( 2 ) Richmond, VA; MD., 1973.
( c ) *Boundaries.* The Northern Neck George Washington Birthplace viticultural area consists of all of the lands in the Counties of Westmoreland, King George, Northumberland, Lancaster and Richmond, in the Commonwealth of Virginia. The boundaries of the Northern Neck George Washington Birthplace viticultural area, using landmarks and points of reference found on the appropriate U.S.G.S. maps, are as follows: ( 1 ) Beginning on the Washington, DC; Maryland; Virginia U.S.G.S. map at a point on Potomac Creek where the King George County western boundary line at its northermost point intersects Potomac Creek the boundary proceeds easterly and southeasterly on the Richmond, VA; MD. U.S.G.S. map, along the Virginia shoreline of the Potomac River for approximately 66 miles to Smith Point on the Chesapeake Bay;
( 2 ) Thence southerly along the shoreline of the Chesapeake Bay for approximately 20 miles to Windmill Point at the mouth of the Rappahannock River;
( 3 ) Thence northwesterly along the banks of the Rappahannock River for approximately 72 air miles to Muddy Creek at the point where the western boundary line of King George County at its southernmost point begins;
( 4 ) Thence northward along the King George County/Stafford County line approximately 7 miles to the point of the beginning.
[T.D. ATF-250, 52 FR 13082, Apr. 21, 1987]