alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY ELEVATION

 238.81

 238.49

 239.06

 240.26

 238.93

 238.54

 238.29

 238.20

 238.16

 238.07

 238.07

 238.07

 239.04

 238.27

 238.18

 238.05

 238.05

 238.05

 238.05

 238.05

 238.05

 238.05

 238.05

 238.05

 238.05

 238.05

 238.05

 238.05

 238.05

 238.05

 238.05

 331

 298

 357

 506

 343

 303

 278

 268

 264

 255

 255

 255

 355

 276

 266

 253

 253

 253

 253

 253

 253

 253

 253

 253

 253

 253

 253

 253

 253

 253

 253

STORAGE

-84

-33

+59

+149

-163

-40

-25

-10

-4

-9

+0

+0

+100

-79

-10

-13

+0

+0

+0

+0

+0

+0

+0

+0

+0

+0

+0

+0

+0

+0

+0

CHANGE

 154

 111

 83

 59

 52

 10

 0

 0

 86

 49

 0

 0

 0

 0

 76

 146

 172

 161

 167

 159

 164

 168

 81

 111

 184

 180

 167

 183

 97

 92

 78

 9,710

 8,460

 10,800

 13,700

 9,860

 8,600

 7,840

 7,360

 7,420

 7,120

 6,800

 6,410

 10,100

 7,440

 6,870

 6,580

 6,260

 6,320

 6,170

 5,990

 5,970

 5,950

 5,770

 5,720

 5,740

 5,900

 5,680

 5,540

 5,380

 6,170

 6,260

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

MARCH 2010 RED BLUFF DIVERSION RESERVOIR DAILY OPERATIONS RUN DATE: April 1, 2010

IN LAKE

CANAL

 ACRE-FEET

TOTALS -162 2,990 223,890

ACRE-FEET -162 5,931 444,086

SUMMARY

RELEASE (ACRE-FEET)

TOTAL 450,116

 415

RELEASE

RIVER

CORNING TO SACTO

CANAL

RELEASE C.F.S

TEHAMA

COLUSA

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 34

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 16

 0

 0

 0

 0

 50

 99

CORNING CANAL 99

TEHAMA-COLUSA CANAL 5,931

TO SACTO RIVER 444,086
Exhibit 99.1

ENSTAR INCOME PROGRAM 1984-1, L.P.

12405 Powerscourt Drive

St. Louis, MO 63131

CERTIFICATION OF EXECUTIVE VICE PRESIDENT, CHIEF ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICER, AND SOLE DIRECTOR OF THE CORPORATE GENERAL PARTNER REGARDING PERIODIC REPORT CONTAINING FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

I, Steve A. Schumm, the Executive Vice President, Chief Adminstrative Officer, and Sole Director of the Corporate General Partner in compliance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, hereby certify that, the Company's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2002 (the "Report") filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission: 

fully complies with the requirements of Section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and 
the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

/s/ Steve A. Schumm	

Steve A. Schumm

Executive Vice President, Chief

Adminstrative Officer, and Sole Director

of the Corporate General Partner

August 14, 2002
Exhibit 32(b)



Certification Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002



In connection with the filing of this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the three months
ended March 31, 2004 (the Report) by CompuCom Systems, Inc. (Registrant), the undersigned hereby certifies that:



| | 1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and
| | -- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Registrant.
| | -- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------





/s/ M. Lazane SmithM. Lazane Smith,Senior Vice President, Finance and ChiefFinancial Officer




A signed original of this
written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Registrant and will be retained by the Registrant and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
EXHIBIT 10.252



                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                            18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


IN CONNECTION WITH THE QUARTERLY REPORT OF MEGO FINANCIAL CORP., (THE "COMPANY")
ON  FORM  10-Q  FOR THE PERIOD ENDING JUNE 30, 2002 AS FILED WITH THE SECURITIES
AND  EXCHANGE COMMISSION ON THE DATE HEREOF (THE "REPORT"), I, FLOYD W. KEPHART,
CHIEF  EXECUTIVE OFFICER OF THE COMPANY, CERTIFY, PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. 1350, AS
ADOPTED  PURSUANT  TO  906  OF  THE  SARBANES-OXLEY  ACT  OF  2002,  THAT:

     (1) THE REPORT FULLY COMPLIES WITH THE REQUIREMENTS OF SECTION 13 (A) OR 15
         (D) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934; AND

     (2) THE INFORMATION CONTAINED IN THE REPORT FAIRLY PRESENTS, IN ALL
         MATERIAL RESPECTS, THE FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULT OF OPERATIONS OF
         THE COMPANY.


/S/  FLOYD  W.  KEPHART

FLOYD  W.  KEPHART
CHIEF  EXECUTIVE  OFFICER
AUGUST  12,  2002
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

DAY HIGH

 563

 490

 337

 319

 324

 325

 319

 314

 306

 308

 301

 295

 287

 282

 281

 275

 275

 283

 320

 828

 753

 782

 2,174

 6,295

 4,585

 4,758

 3,711

 1,581

 282

 311

 285

 286

 276

 278

 278

 280

 283

 285

 278

 273

 264

 266

 265

 266

 267

 268

 270

 272

 278

 288

 289

 387

 395

 408

 465

 443

 358

 344

 312

 301

 297

 292

 293

 293

 293

 296

 292

 281

 276

 273

 271

 270

 271

 272

 277

 326

 359

 360

 543

 1,612

 1,125

 1,384

 1,135

 707

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

FEBRUARY 2010 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: March 3, 2010

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

PITTSBURG BOTTOM ON THE SACRAMENTO RIVER
#### § 411.410 Does each referral from an EN to a State VR agency require its own agreement?

No. The agreements between ENs and State VR agencies should be broad-based and apply to all beneficiaries who may be referred by the EN to the State VR agency for services, although an EN and a State VR agency may want to enter into an individualized agreement to meet the needs of a single beneficiary.
Editorial Note on Part 416
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 416 appear at 68 FR 53509, Sept. 11, 2003.

§ 416.2227 Resolution of disputes. ( a ) *Disputes on the amount to be paid.* The appropriate SSA official will notify the State VR agency in writing of his or her determination concerning the amount to be paid. If the State VR agency disagrees with that determination, the State VR agency may request reconsideration in writing within 60 days after receiving the notice of determination. The Commissioner will make a determination and notify the State VR agency of that decision in writing, usually, no later than 45 days from the date of the State VR agency's appeal. The decision by the Commissioner will be final and conclusive upon the State VR agency unless the State VR agency appeals that decision in writing in accordance with 45 CFR part 16 to the Department of Health and Human Services' Departmental Appeals Board within 30 days after receiving the Commissioner's decision.
( b ) *Disputes on whether there was a continuous period of SGA and whether VR services contributed to a continuous period of SGA.* The rules in paragraph (a) of this section will apply, except that the Commissioner's decision will be final and conclusive. There is no right of appeal to the Departmental Appeals Board.
( c ) *Disputes on determinations made by the Commissioner which affect a disabled or blind beneficiary's rights to benefits.* Determinations made by the Commissioner which affect an individual's right to benefits (e.g., determinations that disability or blindness benefits should be terminated, denied, suspended, continued or begun at a different date than alleged) cannot be appealed by a State VR agency. Because these determinations are an integral part of the disability or blindness benefits claims process, they can only be appealed by the beneficiary or applicant whose rights are affected or by his or her authorized representative. However, if an appeal of an unfavorable determination is made by the individual and is successful, the new determination would also apply for purposes of this subpart. While a VR agency cannot appeal a determination made by the Commissioner which affects a beneficiary's or applicant's rights, the VR agency can furnish any evidence it may have which would support a revision of a determination.
[48 FR 6297, Feb. 10, 1983, as amended at 55 FR 8458, Mar. 8, 1990; 62 FR 38456, July 18, 1997; 83 FR 62462, Dec. 4, 2018]
IB 

Union Calendar No. 384 

114TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 414 

[Report No. 114–504] 

To amend the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection 

Act to repeal certain additional disclosure requirements, and for other 

purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JANUARY 20, 2015 

Mr. HUIZENGA of Michigan (for himself, Mr. GARRETT, Mr. ROYCE, Mr. 

GUINTA, Mr. STIVERS, Mr. NEUGEBAUER, Mr. DUFFY, Mr. MCHENRY, 

Mrs. WAGNER, Mr. MESSER, Mr. HILL, Mr. BARR, Mr. LUETKEMEYER, 

Mr. WILLIAMS, and Mr. MULVANEY) introduced the following bill; which 

was referred to the Committee on Financial Services 

APRIL 19, 2016 

Additional sponsors: Mr. KING of New York, Mr. HURT of Virginia, Mr. 

PITTENGER, Mr. LUCAS, Mr. SCHWEIKERT, Mr. PEARCE, Mr. WESTMORELAND, Mr. STUTZMAN, and Mr. FINCHER

APRIL 19, 2016 

Committed to the Committee of the Whole House on the State of the Union 

and ordered to be printed 


sradovich on DSK3TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 414 RH

A BILL 

To amend the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act to repeal certain additional disclosure requirements, and for other purposes. 


sradovich on DSK3TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
3 

•HR 414 RH

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Burdensome Data Col5 lection Relief Act’’. 

6 SEC. 2. REPEAL OF ADDITIONAL DISCLOSURE REQUIRE7 MENTS. 

8 Section 953(b) of the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Re9 form and Consumer Protection Act (15 U.S.C. 781 note) 

10 is hereby repealed and any regulations issued pursuant to 

11 such subsection shall have no force or effect. 


sradovich on DSK3TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
Union Calendar No. 384 

114TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 414 

[Report No. 114–504] 

A BILL 

To amend the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and 

poses. tional disclosure requirements, and for other purConsumer Protection Act to repeal certain addiAPRIL 19, 2016 

Committed to the Committee of the Whole House on the 

State of the Union and ordered to be printed 


sradovich on DSK3TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
#### § 404.1262 Manner of payment of contributions by State—for wages paid prior to 1987.

When paying its contributions, the State shall deposit its payment at the specific Federal Reserve bank or branch designated by SSA.
### §2296a. Economic assistance

#### (a) Purpose of assistance

The purpose of assistance under this section is to foster economic growth and development, including the conditions necessary for regional economic cooperation, in the South Caucasus and Central Asia.

#### (b) Authorization for assistance

To carry out the purpose of subsection (a), the President is authorized to provide assistance for the countries of the South Caucasus and Central Asia to support the activities described in subsection (c).

#### (c) Activities supported

In addition to the activities described in section 2295 of this title, activities supported by assistance under subsection (b) should support the development of the structures and means necessary for the growth of private sector economies based upon market principles.

(Pub. L. 87–195, pt. I, §499A, as added Pub. L. 106–113, div. B, §1000(a)(2) [title V, §596(b)], Nov. 29, 1999, 113 Stat. 1535, 1501A–124.)

#### **Executive Documents**

#### Delegation of Functions

For delegation of functions of President under this section, see Ex. Ord. No. 12163, Sept. 29, 1979, 44 F.R. 56673, as amended, set out as a note under section 2381 of this title.
#### Lilyan Amsterdam, Appellant, v. Frances Mandel, Respondent.

In an action to recover brokerage commissions, order denying plaintiff’s motion to examine two witnesses — alleged agents of defendant — before trial, reversed on the law and the facts, with $10 costs and disbursements, and the motion granted, with $10 costs, the examination to proceed on five days’ notice. The facts disclosed by the affidavit show the existence of special circumstances entitling plaintiff to the examination. *(Bloede Co.*V. *Devine Go.,*211 App. Div. 180; *Barber*v. *DeBruin,*253 App. Div. 909; *Laruffa*v. *Astarita,*264 App. Div. 785.) Lewis, P. J., Carswell, Johnston, Adel and Wenzel, JJ., concur.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          AUG-30-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-01-1998
<CASH>                                          10,724
<SECURITIES>                                     1,812
<RECEIVABLES>                                   18,085
<ALLOWANCES>                                       844
<INVENTORY>                                     26,349
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                58,351
<PP&E>                                          47,854
<DEPRECIATION>                                  38,751
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  75,363
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           20,448
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           110
<OTHER-SE>                                      53,547
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    75,363
<SALES>                                         26,007
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                26,007
<CGS>                                           15,543
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   15,543
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                15,097
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (4,633)
<INCOME-TAX>                                        50
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (4,683)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (4,683)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.43)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.43)
        

</TABLE>
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

DAY HIGH

 13,305

 13,333

 15,787

 16,718

 16,336

 15,848

 14,961

 12,695

 12,117

 13,840

 14,704

 14,436

 13,354

 13,845

 13,531

 14,573

 13,014

 13,280

 13,338

 13,558

 13,548

 12,198

 11,439

 12,834

 11,640

 13,731

 13,057

 12,047

 14,310

 11,864

 3,488

 4,124

 5,414

 5,795

 5,634

 6,366

 6,066

 4,618

 5,377

 5,726

 3,470

 6,455

 5,302

 4,399

 3,700

 5,012

 5,871

 5,830

 5,643

 5,923

 6,294

 6,537

 5,723

 4,680

 6,100

 6,015

 6,640

 5,521

 4,885

 4,789

 8,234

 9,150

 10,611

 10,644

 10,154

 10,213

 9,629

 8,745

 8,627

 8,603

 8,797

 9,867

 9,893

 8,904

 9,851

 9,373

 9,030

 9,021

 9,211

 9,518

 9,469

 9,184

 8,709

 8,609

 8,775

 9,500

 9,647

 9,082

 8,986

 8,629

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

SEPTEMBER 2002 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: October 9, 2002

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

PITTSBURG TOP ON THE SACRAMENTO RIVER
#### § 422.101 Material included in this subpart.

This subpart describes the procedures relating to applications for and assignment of social security numbers, maintenance of earnings records of individuals by the Social Security Administration, requests for statements of earnings or for revision of earnings records, and general claims procedures, including filing of applications, submission of evidence, determinations, and reconsideration of initial determinations.
Exhibit 32.1

Certification of Principal Executive Officer  Pursuant to  Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. 1350)

In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2007 (the "Report") of ATS Corporation (the
"Registrant"), as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, I, Edward H. Bersoff, Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Registrant, hereby certify that:

(1)   The
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

(2)   The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant.

|Date: March 17, 2008 |  | By: | /s/ Edward H. BersoffEdward H. Bersoff
Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer
(Principal Executive Officer)
|-------------------- |  | --- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

---



QuickLinks
EXHIBIT 13.1

Certification by the Chief Executive Officer

Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of China
Medical Technologies, Inc. (the Company) on Form 20-F for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Xiaodong Wu, Chief Executive Officer
of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
the Company.

Date: September 30, 2009



|       |  |                        
|------ |  | -----------------------
|By:    |  | /s/ Xiaodong Wu        
|Name:  |  | Xiaodong Wu            
|Title: |  | Chief Executive Officer
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY HIGH

 344

 352

 328

 323

 328

 338

 344

 338

 342

 362

 398

 452

 503

 533

 524

 556

 477

 412

 405

 392

 380

 389

 415

 443

 473

 516

 571

 627

 642

 642

 649

 228

 237

 219

 254

 242

 241

 240

 245

 268

 259

 252

 246

 240

 237

 254

 223

 223

 217

 214

 192

 226

 244

 264

 256

 250

 245

 250

 275

 266

 260

 266

 305

 306

 302

 306

 310

 317

 308

 310

 315

 323

 330

 344

 358

 360

 364

 375

 375

 352

 350

 338

 352

 353

 354

 365

 377

 394

 411

 437

 441

 434

 444

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

MAY 2021 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: June 1, 2021

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

SAN ANDREAS ON THE SAN JOAQUIN RIVER
#### § 411.620 How long does the PM have to recommend a resolution to the dispute?

The PM has 20 working days to provide a written recommendation. The recommendation should explain the reasoning for the proposed resolution.
EXHIBIT 11
                            BellSouth Corporation
                      Computation of Earnings Per Share


                                       For the Three Month Period Ended
                                                    March 31,
                                           1999                2000

Basic Earnings Per Common Share:

Net Income                                  $ 615             $ 1,001

Weighted average shares
Outstanding                                 1,932               1,881

Earnings Per Common Share                  $  .32              $  .53





                                      For the Three Month Period Ended
                                                  March 31,
                                          1999                2000

Diluted Earnings per Common Share:

Net Income                               $  615             $ 1,001

Weighted average shares
Outstanding                               1,932               1,881

Incremental shares from
Assumed exercise of
stock options and payment of
performance share awards                     19                  17


Total Shares                              1,951               1,898

Earnings Per Common Share                $  .32               $ .53
(No. 6079

#### Gulf Oil Corporation, Claimant, *vs.*State of Illinois, Various Agencies, Respondent.

*Opinion filed October 11, 1973.*

Gulf Oil Corporation, Claimant, pro se.

*90William J. Scott, Attorney General; William E. Webber, Assistant Attorney General, for Respondent.

Per Curiam.
M A N D A T E

TO THE 36TH DISTRICT COURT of SAN PATRICIO COUNTY, GREETINGS:

Before our Court of Appeals for the Thirteenth District of Texas, on the 23rd day of July,

2015, the cause upon appeal to revise or reverse your judgment between

Andy Torres Ramos, Appellant,

v.

The State of Texas Appellee.

CAUSE NO. 13-14-00199-CR (Tr.Ct.No. S-13-3236-CR)

was determined; and therein our said Court made its order in these words:

THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS, having considered this cause on

appeal, concludes that the judgment of the trial court should be AFFIRMED. The Court

orders the judgment of the trial court AFFIRMED.

We further order this decision certified below for observance.

      

WHEREFORE, WE COMMAND YOU to observe the order of our said Court of Appeals

for the Thirteenth District of Texas, in this behalf, and in all things have it duly

recognized, obeyed and executed.

WITNESS, the Hon. Rogelio Valdez, Chief Justice of our Court of Appeals, with the seal

thereof affixed, at the City of Edinburg, Texas this 21st day of December, 2015.

Dorian E. Ramirez, CLERK

FILE COPY
Editorial Note on Part 416
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 416 appear at 68 FR 53509, Sept. 11, 2003.

§ 416.350 Treating a title II application as an oral inquiry about SSI benefits. ( a ) When a person applies for benefits under title II (retirement, survivors, or disability benefits) we will explain the requirements for receiving SSI benefits and give the person a chance to file an application for them if— ( 1 ) The person is within 2 months of age 65 or older or it looks as if the person might qualify as a blind or disabled person, and
( 2 ) It is not clear that the person's title II benefits would prevent him or her from receiving SSI or any State supplementary benefits handled by the Social Security Administration.
( b ) If the person applying for title II benefits does not file an application for SSI on a prescribed form when SSI is explained to him or her, we will treat his or her filing of an application for title II benefits as an oral inquiry about SSI, and the date of the title II application form may be used to establish the SSI application date if the requirements of § 416.345 (d) and (e) are met.