alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# C_2016075EN.01027502.xml

| 26.2.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 75/275 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

26.2.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 75/275

---

P7_TA(2013)0306

Wheeled vehicles (Amendment of Council Decision 2000/125/EC (‘parallel agreement’)) ***

European Parliament legislative resolution of 3 July 2013 on the draft Council decision amending Decision 2000/125/EC of 31 January 2000 concerning the conclusion of the Agreement concerning the establishing of global technical regulations for wheeled vehicles, equipment and parts which can be fitted and/or be used on wheeled vehicles (‘Parallel Agreement’) (05975/2013 — C7-0071/2013 — 2012/0098(NLE))

(Consent)

(2016/C 075/39)

The European Parliament,

The European Parliament

| — | having regard to the draft Council decision (05975/2013), |
| --- | --- |

—

having regard to the draft Council decision (05975/2013),

| — | having regard to the request for consent submitted by the Council in accordance with Article 207(4) and Article 218(6), second subparagraph, point (a), of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (C7-0071/2013), |
| --- | --- |

—

having regard to the request for consent submitted by the Council in accordance with Article 207(4) and Article 218(6), second subparagraph, point (a), of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (C7-0071/2013),

| — | having regard to Rules 81 and 90(7) of its Rules of Procedure, |
| --- | --- |

—

having regard to Rules 81 and 90(7) of its Rules of Procedure,

| — | having regard to the recommendation of the Committee on International Trade (A7-0194/2013), |
| --- | --- |

—

having regard to the recommendation of the Committee on International Trade (A7-0194/2013),

| 1. | Consents to the draft Council decision; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Consents to the draft Council decision;

| 2. | Instructs its President to forward its position to the Council, the Commission and the governments and parliaments of the Member States. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Instructs its President to forward its position to the Council, the Commission and the governments and parliaments of the Member States.

---
|Exhibit 32.1
|------------

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Hemis Corporation (the "Company") on Form 10-K for the period ended December 31, 2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the "Report"), the undersigned, in the capacities and on the dates indicated below, hereby certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:

|1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                               
|-- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|  
|2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
|  

Dated: April 11, 2008
     /s/Norman Meier
Norman Meier
President, Chief Executive Officer


---
**Exhibit 32.2**

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO**

**18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION**

**OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

I, Sam Singer, Chief Financial Officer of Bio-Reference Laboratories, Inc.(the ACompany@), do hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, asadopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

(a)                                  the Annual Report on Form 10-K of theCompany for the fiscal year ended October 31 2007, which thiscertification accompanies (the APeriodic Report@), fully complies with therequirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;and

 

(b)                                 based on my knowledge, the informationcontained in the Periodic Report fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

Dated: January 10, 2008

 

 
|   | /S/ Sam Singer                        |   |
|--------|---------------------------------------|--------|
|   | Sam Singer                            |
|   | Chief Financial Officer               |
|   | Bio-Reference Laboratories, Inc. |

 

1

----
#### § 222.57 When an equitably adopted child is dependent.

An employee's equitably adopted child, as defined in § 222.34, is considered dependent upon the employee if the employee was either living with or contributing to the support of the child at the time of his or her death. If the equitable adoption is found to have occurred after the employee could have become entitled to an old age or disability benefit under the Social Security Act (treating his or her railroad compensation as wages under that Act), the child is not considered dependent on the employee during the employee's lifetime. If the equitable adoption took place before such time, the child is dependent on the employee if the employee was living with or contributing to the support of the child at one of the times shown in § 222.51.
Editorial Note on Part 416
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 416 appear at 68 FR 53509, Sept. 11, 2003.

§ 416.1150 How we treat income received because of a major disaster. ( a ) *General.* The Disaster Relief and Emergency Assistance Act and other Federal statutes provide assistance to victims of major disasters. In this section we describe when we do not count certain kinds of assistance you receive under these statutes.
( b ) *Support and maintenance.* ( 1 ) We do not count the value of support and maintenance (in cash or in kind) received from a Federal, State, or local government source, or from a disaster assistance organization, and the one-third reduction rule does not apply if— ( i ) You live in a household which you or you and another person maintain as your home when a catastrophe occurs in the area;
( ii ) The President of the United States declares the catastrophe to be a major disaster for purposes of the Disaster Relief and Emergency Assistance Act;
( iii ) You stop living in the home because of the catastrophe and within 30 days after the catastrophe you begin to receive support and maintenance; and
( iv ) You receive the support and maintenance while living in a residential facility maintained by another person.
( 2 ) We do not count the value of support and maintenance (in cash or in kind) received from any other source, such as from a private household, and the one-third reduction rule does not apply for up to 18 months after you begin to receive it if— ( i ) You live in a household which you or you and another person maintain as your home when a catastrophe occurs in the area;
( ii ) The President of the United States declares the catastrophe to be a major disaster for purposes of the Disaster Relief and Emergency Assistance Act;
( iii ) You stop living in the home because of the catastrophe and within 30 days after the catastrophe you begin to receive support and maintenance; and
( iv ) You receive the support and maintenance while living in a residential facility (including a private household) maintained by another person.
( c ) *Other assistance you receive.* We do not consider other assistance to be income if you receive it under the Disaster Relief and Emergency Assistance Act or under another Federal statute because of a catastrophe which the President declares to be a major disaster or if you receive it from a State or local government or from a disaster assistance organization. For example, you may receive payments to repair or replace your home or other property.
( d ) *Interest payments.* We do not count any interest earned on the assistance payments described in paragraph (c) of this section.
[57 FR 53850, Nov. 13, 1992]
**CERTIFICATIONS**     I, Stanley J. Talbi, certify that:     1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on    Form 10-Q    of MetLife Insurance Company of Connecticut;     2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any    untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material    fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the    circumstances under which such statements were made, not    misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;     3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and    other financial information included in this report, fairly    present in all material respects the financial condition,    results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of,    and for, the periods presented in this report;     4. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I    are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure    controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act    Rules 13a-15(e)    and    15d-15(e))    for the registrant and have:     a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or    caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed    under our supervision, to ensure that material information    relating to the registrant, including its consolidated    subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those    entities, particularly during the period in which this report is    being prepared;     b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s    disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report    our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure    controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by    this report based on such evaluation; and     c) Disclosed in this report any change in the    registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that    occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter    (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an    annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably    likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal    control over financial reporting; and     5. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I    have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal    control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s    auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board    of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):     a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in    the design or operation of internal control over financial    reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the    registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and    report financial information; and     b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves    management or other employees who have a significant role in the    registrant’s internal control over financial reporting. /s/  Stanley    J. Talbi    Stanley J. Talbi*Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer*     Date: May 11, 2007
#### Edward Lorenz v. State of Nebraska

Filed January 19, 1898.

No. 9508.

1. Criminal Law: Evidence: Opinion oe Attorney General. A conviction in a criminal case will ordinarily be reversed where the attorney general declines to file a brief on the ground that the evidence is insufficient to sustain the judgment. •

2. Homicide: Evidence. The evidence in the case examined, and *held*not sufficient to support the verdict.

Error to the district court for Red Willow county. Tried bei^w before Norris, J.

*Reversed.*

*W. R. Starr,*for plaintiff in error.

*G. J. Smyth, Attorney General,*and *Ed P. Smith, Deputy Attorney General,*for the state.

Norval, J.

The defendant below, Edward Lorenz, a boy sixteen years old, was tried and convicted of murder in the first degree, and sentenced to imprisonment in the penitentiary for life. The petition in error, among other assignments, alleges that the verdict is not sustained by the evidence. The attorney general has declined to file a brief in the cause, giving as a reason therefor that he is convinced, upon an examination of the record, that said assignment is well taken; therefore, upon the authority of *George v. State,*44 Neb. 757, and *McAlcer v. State,*46 Neb. 116, we would be justified in reversing the judgment and sentence. A careful perusal of the evidence adduced by the state on the trial, and none was introduced by the defense, satisfies us that it is insufficient to sustain a verdict of guilty. It may be the accused committed the crime charged, but if so, the state has failed to prove it.

Reversed and remanded.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                                            9
<MULTIPLIER>                                     1,000
<CURRENCY>                                     US DOLLARS
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>               DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                  JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                    JUN-30-1997
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<CASH>                                          91,459
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                          31,328
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                 2,616
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                  1,433,656
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                         620,003
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                           596,417
<LOANS>                                      3,566,788
<ALLOWANCE>                                     22,960
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               5,931,501
<DEPOSITS>                                   4,517,674
<SHORT-TERM>                                         0
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                             83,006
<LONG-TERM>                                    908,096
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        37,659
<OTHER-SE>                                     385,066
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>               5,931,501
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                148,239
<INTEREST-INVEST>                               70,524
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                     0
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                               218,763
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                             100,284
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              22,693
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                           95,786
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                    4,350
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                 102
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                 54,751
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 60,829
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                      39,090
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    39,090
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     1.05
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.05
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    3.19
<LOANS-NON>                                     11,398
<LOANS-PAST>                                         0
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                     0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                  6,216
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                23,228
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                    5,347
<RECOVERIES>                                       729
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                               22,960
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                                 0
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                         22,960
        


</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from SEC
Form 10-Q and is qualified in its entirety by reference to such financial
statements.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1998
<CASH>                                              28
<SECURITIES>                                       302
<RECEIVABLES>                                    1,104
<ALLOWANCES>                                        13
<INVENTORY>                                         49
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 1,770
<PP&E>                                           1,121
<DEPRECIATION>                                     376
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   4,984
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            3,151
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          3
<COMMON>                                           217
<OTHER-SE>                                       1,591
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     4,984
<SALES>                                          4,357
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 4,357
<CGS>                                            2,398
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    2,398
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 4,164
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     9
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  29
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (2,218)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (2,218)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (2,218)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.11)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.11)
        

</TABLE>
### Part I—Congressional Review and Oversight
Exhibit 10(d)

      Lease, dated as of July 10, 2002, between 121 Airport Centre II, LP as
landlord, and Warrantech Corporation, as tenant, is for office space of 56,696
square feet located on the first floor of 121 Airport Centre II, 22090 Highway
121, Bedford, Texas, as more particularly described on Exhibit A to the Lease.
The Lease has a term of 124 months commencing on December 13, 2002 and ending on
December 31, 2012, unless sooner terminated in accordance with the provisions of
the Lease, and provides for average monthly rental payments of $87,879.00.





                                       9
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY HIGH

 123

 120

 117

 117

 118

 161

 162

 127

 125

 125

 126

 127

 128

 124

 159

 145

 201

 184

 146

 114

 115

 116

 116

 119

 126

 187

 162

 129

 122

 120

 120

 110

 109

 106

 109

 110

 114

 118

 122

 120

 121

 120

 118

 119

 113

 108

 106

 109

 107

 104

 107

 109

 111

 110

 112

 112

 111

 117

 116

 111

 110

 113

 117

 115

 113

 113

 115

 126

 134

 125

 123

 123

 123

 123

 123

 120

 128

 124

 126

 133

 115

 110

 111

 112

 113

 115

 117

 123

 129

 121

 118

 117

 117

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

MAY 2017 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: June 5, 2017

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

PITTSBURG BOTTOM ON THE SACRAMENTO RIVER
Exhibit 23.1

CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement (Form S-3
No. 333-124601) of KapStone Paper and Packaging Corporation, in the related Prospectus and in the Registration Statement (Form S-8
No. 333-141916) pertaining to the 2006 Incentive Plan, Registration Statement (Form S-8 No. 333-167181) pertaining to the Amended and Restated
2006 Incentive Plan, and in the Registration Statement (Form S-8 No. 333-163667) pertaining to the 2009 Employee Stock Purchase Plan of our reports dated
March 4, 2011, with respect to the consolidated financial statements and schedule of KapStone Paper and Packaging Corporation and the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting
of KapStone Paper and Packaging Corporation, included in this Annual Report (Form 10-K) for the year-ended December 31, 2010.

/s/
Ernst & Young LLP

Chicago,
Illinois
March 4, 2011

---



QuickLinks
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY HIGH

 5,500

 6,908

 6,522

 6,849

 7,024

 6,451

 5,159

 4,963

 3,636

 2,503

 2,125

 1,761

 1,955

 3,501

 2,839

 3,082

 1,611

 2,214

 1,490

 348

 324

 282

 241

 199

 189

 183

 162

 152

 144

 148

 143

 1,776

 1,961

 1,831

 2,033

 1,877

 1,905

 1,244

 1,173

 790

 587

 362

 324

 329

 451

 388

 255

 229

 221

 281

 214

 247

 213

 186

 163

 162

 146

 141

 133

 132

 137

 128

 3,065

 3,449

 3,661

 3,925

 3,864

 3,834

 3,000

 2,526

 1,958

 1,387

 949

 701

 763

 1,175

 1,061

 985

 570

 640

 449

 274

 275

 247

 216

 186

 172

 161

 152

 145

 137

 142

 138

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

DECEMBER 2010 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: January 6, 2011

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

PITTSBURG TOP ON THE SACRAMENTO RIVER
EXHIBIT 32.1 

Certification of CEO and CFO Pursuant to 

18 U.S.C. Section 1350, 

as Adopted Pursuant to 

Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 

In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of BlackRock Capital Investment Corporation and subsidiaries (the “Company”) for the annual period ended December 31, 2018 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), James E. Keenan, as Interim Chief Executive Officer of the Company, and Michael Pungello, as Interim Chief Financial Officer and Interim Treasurer of the Company, each hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that: 

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and 

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the consolidated financial condition and consolidated results of operations of the Company. 

 

| /s/ James E. Keenan  |
|----------------------|
| Name:                |   | James E. Keenan |
| Title:               |   | Interim Chief Executive Officer |
| Date:                |   | March 6, 2019 |
|                 |   |   |
| /s/ Michael Pungello |
| Name:                |   | Michael Pungello |
| Title:               |   | Interim Chief Financial Officer and Interim Treasurer |
| Date:                |   | March 6, 2019 |