alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Editorial Note on Part 416
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 416 appear at 68 FR 53509, Sept. 11, 2003.

§ 416.1228 Exclusion of Alaskan natives' stock in regional or village corporations. ( a ) In determining the resources of a native of Alaska (and spouse, if any) there will be excluded from resources, shares of stock held in a regional or village corporation during the period of 20 years in which such stock is inalienable, as provided by sections 7(h) and 8(c) of the Alaska Native Claims Settlement Act (43 U.S.C. 1606, 1607). The 20-year period of inalienability terminates on January 1, 1992.
( b ) As used in this section, *native of Alaska* has the same meaning as that contained in section 3(b) of the Alaska Native Claims Settlement Act (43 U.S.C. 1602(b)).
§ 322.5 Payments under vacation agreements. ( a ) *General.* In ascertaining the accrual of remuneration under a vacation agreement, consideration shall be given to the applicable agreements and practices, the interpretations of such agreements and practices developed by the parties, and the actions of the parties pursuant thereto. When there is information that an employee has received or is to receive payment under a vacation agreement, such payment shall, in the absence of evidence to the contrary, be considered to be remuneration with respect to the days to which the payment is assigned.
( b ) *Vacation pay.* If an employee takes a vacation in accordance with a vacation agreement, the payment for such vacation shall constitute remuneration with respect to the days in the vacation period for which the payment is made. An employee shall be regarded as taking a vacation when, in accordance with the applicable agreements and practices ( 1 ) he is absent from work during a scheduled or assigned vacation period;
( 2 ) he is required to take his vacation with pay while he is on furlough; or
( 3 ) he chooses to take his vacation with pay while he is unemployed or absent from work due to illness or other personal circumstances.
( c ) *Pay in lieu of vacation.* If a payment in lieu of vacation is made to an employee under a vacation agreement such payment shall not constitute remuneration with respect to any particular day or days. A payment under a vacation agreement shall be regarded as in lieu of vacation if: ( 1 ) The payment is made at the end of the vacation year to an employee who did not take his vacation during such year; or
( 2 ) The payment is made after the employee's death, or after he ceased service for the purpose of receiving an annuity, and the payment is credited to the employee's last day of service; or
( 3 ) It is otherwise established that the parties intended the payment to be in lieu of vacation, without reference to any particular period.
[Board Order 59-73, 24 FR 2487, Mar. 31, 1959, as amended at 65 FR 14460, Mar. 17, 2000]
#### § 422.430 When will we refund amounts of your pay withheld by administrative wage garnishment?

If we find that you do not owe the debt or that we have no right to collect it, we will promptly refund to you any amount withheld from your disposable pay under this subpart that we received and cancel any administrative wage garnishment order that we issued. Refunds under this section will not bear interest unless Federal law or contract requires interest.
###### Editorial Note on Part 416

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 416 appear at 68 FR 53509, Sept. 11, 2003.

#### § 416.1872 Who is considered a student.

We consider you to be a student if you are under 22 years old and you regularly attend school or college or training that is designed to prepare you for a paying job as described in § 416.1861(a) through (e).

[71 FR 66867, Nov. 17, 2006]
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

DAY HIGH

 216

 229

 247

 222

 211

 202

 163

 160

 164

 174

 177

 196

 196

 208

 194

 182

 172

 175

 177

 174

 179

 190

 188

 201

 204

 205

 205

 200

 205

 217

 128

 121

 123

 129

 139

 164

 149

 144

 141

 141

 132

 127

 133

 140

 151

 151

 158

 155

 152

 143

 142

 125

 119

 116

 119

 116

 116

 123

 122

 116

 180

 183

 189

 185

 192

 180

 154

 150

 156

 161

 164

 175

 182

 187

 184

 171

 165

 165

 166

 163

 161

 165

 165

 172

 180

 180

 179

 175

 175

 183

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

APRIL 2006 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: May 2, 2006

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

RIO VISTA ON THE SACRAMENTO RIVER
Editorial Note on Part 416
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 416 appear at 68 FR 53509, Sept. 11, 2003.

§ 416.2161 Charges to States. ( a ) *States with Medicaid eligibility determination agreement.* A State with which we have an agreement to make Medicaid eligibility determinations is charged in the following manner: ( 1 ) If making Medicaid determinations and providing basic SSI application information for a State causes us additional cost, the State must pay half of that additional cost. “Additional cost” in this section means cost in addition to costs we would have had anyway in administering the SSI program.
( 2 ) The State must pay half our additional cost caused by providing any information that we collect for Medicaid purposes and by any other services directly related to making Medicaid eligibility determinations.
( 3 ) The State must pay our full additional cost for statistical or other studies and any other services that are not directly related to making Medicaid eligibility determinations.
( b ) *States without Medicaid eligibility determination agreement.* A State with which we do not have an agreement to make Medicaid eligibility determinations is charged in the following manner: ( 1 ) If providing basic SSI application information causes us additional cost, the State must pay our full additional cost.
( 2 ) The State must pay our full additional cost caused by providing any information that we collect for Medicaid purposes and for statistical or other studies and any other services.
# C_2012031EN.01000601.xml

| 4.2.2012 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 31/6 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

4.2.2012

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 31/6

---

Opinion of the Advisory Committee on restrictive agreements and dominant position given at its meeting of 25 October 2011 regarding a draft decision relating to Case COMP/39.592 — EFAMA/Standard & Poor's

Rapporteur: Finland

2012/C 31/03

| 1. | The Advisory Committee shares the Commission's concerns expressed in its draft decision as communicated to the Advisory Committee on 12 October 2011 under Article 102 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (‘TFEU’) and Article 54 of the EEA Agreement. |
| --- | --- |

1.

The Advisory Committee shares the Commission's concerns expressed in its draft decision as communicated to the Advisory Committee on 12 October 2011 under Article 102 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (‘TFEU’) and Article 54 of the EEA Agreement.

| 2. | The Advisory Committee agrees with the Commission that the proceedings concerning Standard & Poor's can be concluded by means of a decision pursuant to Article 9(1) of Regulation (EC) No 1/2003. |
| --- | --- |

2.

The Advisory Committee agrees with the Commission that the proceedings concerning Standard & Poor's can be concluded by means of a decision pursuant to Article 9(1) of Regulation (EC) No 1/2003.

| 3. | The Advisory Committee agrees with the Commission that the commitments offered by Standard & Poor's are suitable, necessary and proportionate and should be made legally binding on the latter. |
| --- | --- |

3.

The Advisory Committee agrees with the Commission that the commitments offered by Standard & Poor's are suitable, necessary and proportionate and should be made legally binding on the latter.

| 4. | The Advisory Committee agrees with the Commission that, in light of the commitments offered by Standard & Poor's, there are no longer grounds for action by the Commission against the latter, without prejudice to Article 9(2) of Regulation (EC) No 1/2003. |
| --- | --- |

4.

The Advisory Committee agrees with the Commission that, in light of the commitments offered by Standard & Poor's, there are no longer grounds for action by the Commission against the latter, without prejudice to Article 9(2) of Regulation (EC) No 1/2003.

| 5. | The Advisory Committee asks the Commission to take into account any other points raised during the discussion. |
| --- | --- |

5.

The Advisory Committee asks the Commission to take into account any other points raised during the discussion.

| 6. | The Advisory Committee recommends the publication of its opinion in the Official Journal of the European Union. |
| --- | --- |

6.

The Advisory Committee recommends the publication of its opinion in the Official Journal of the European Union.

Official Journal of the European Union.

---
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY ELEVATION

 252.41

 252.42

 252.46

 252.55

 252.50

 252.40

 252.52

 252.56

 252.55

 252.54

 252.39

 252.43

 250.50

 252.48

 252.44

 252.50

 252.41

 248.52

 244.57

 239.15

 239.13

 239.20

 239.17

 239.28

 239.12

 239.19

 239.08

 239.02

 238.92

 239.03

 239.01

 3,879

 3,884

 3,904

 3,948

 3,924

 3,874

 3,933

 3,953

 3,948

 3,943

 3,869

 3,889

 3,022

 3,914

 3,894

 3,924

 3,879

 2,304

 1,253

 368

 366

 374

 370

 384

 364

 373

 360

 352

 342

 354

 351

STORAGE

-49

+5

+20

+44

-24

-50

+59

+20

-5

-5

-74

+20

-867

+892

-20

+30

-45

-1,575

-1,051

-885

-2

+8

-4

+14

-20

+9

-13

-8

-10

+12

-3

CHANGE

 661

 701

 698

 625

 715

 736

 710

 689

 687

 694

 676

 739

 657

 693

 743

 610

 787

 460

 517

 614

 513

 604

 492

 411

 510

 528

 686

 667

 677

 571

 505

 11,670

 11,898

 11,550

 12,366

 11,430

 11,238

 11,034

 10,890

 10,530

 10,794

 10,230

 9,630

 9,822

 9,450

 9,174

 9,366

 9,546

 12,618

 10,300

 9,830

 9,710

 9,690

 9,630

 9,670

 9,570

 9,750

 9,630

 9,270

 9,090

 9,230

 9,270

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

AUGUST 2010 RED BLUFF DIVERSION RESERVOIR DAILY OPERATIONS RUN DATE: September 13, 2010

IN LAKE

CANAL

 ACRE-FEET

TOTALS -3,577 19,576 317,876

ACRE-FEET -3,577 38,829 630,507

SUMMARY

RELEASE (ACRE-FEET)

TOTAL 673,019

 3,928

RELEASE

RIVER

CORNING TO SACTO

CANAL

RELEASE C.F.S

TEHAMA

COLUSA

 65

 57

 60

 64

 64

 59

 62

 62

 56

 59

 74

 88

 76

 75

 67

 54

 56

 56

 64

 66

 83

 56

 38

 41

 37

 47

 47

 68

 62

 55

 39

 1,857

 3,683

CORNING CANAL 3,683

TEHAMA-COLUSA CANAL 38,829

TO SACTO RIVER 630,507
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

DAY HIGH

 213

 209

 209

 203

 197

 191

 192

 196

 199

 211

 200

 204

 202

 191

 194

 201

 193

 195

 192

 185

 185

 187

 193

 194

 190

 187

 186

 185

 183

 179

 188

 178

 177

 174

 173

 170

 165

 163

 160

 163

 166

 165

 166

 170

 165

 168

 170

 173

 171

 172

 169

 166

 165

 166

 166

 164

 164

 166

 167

 170

 199

 192

 190

 186

 182

 177

 173

 173

 175

 180

 179

 178

 180

 179

 177

 180

 180

 179

 178

 176

 174

 172

 174

 175

 174

 172

 172

 173

 173

 173

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

APRIL 2007 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: May 2, 2007

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

RIO VISTA ON THE SACRAMENTO RIVER
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>               THE  SCHEDULE  CONTAINS   SUMMARY  FINANCIAL  INFORMATION
                       EXTRACTED  FROM   THE   CONDENSED   CONSOLIDATED  BALANCE
                       SHEET AT SEPTEMBER 30, 1996 (Unaudited) AND THE CONDENSED
                       CONSOLIDATED  STATEMENT  OF  INCOME  FOR  THE NINE MONTHS
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                               JUN-30-1997
<PERIOD-START>                                  JUL-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                                    SEP-30-1996
<CASH>                                            1,110,529
<SECURITIES>                                      1,248,130
<RECEIVABLES>                                     1,795,853
<ALLOWANCES>                                        290,930
<INVENTORY>                                               0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                  4,303,099
<PP&E>                                            2,251,868
<DEPRECIATION>                                      650,395
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                    7,487,860
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                             1,066,101
<BONDS>                                              53,532
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                     0
<PREFERRED>                                               0
<COMMON>                                             47,820
<OTHER-SE>                                        6,320,407
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                      7,487,860
<SALES>                                                   0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                  1,663,529
<CGS>                                                     0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                             0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                  1,098,078
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     45,000
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                    1,462
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                     563,995
<INCOME-TAX>                                        221,732
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                 342,263
<DISCONTINUED>                                            0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                           0
<CHANGES>                                                 0
<NET-INCOME>                                        342,263
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                           .07
<EPS-DILUTED>                                           .07
                                                

</TABLE>
I 

114TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 4099 

To increase from $10,000,000,000 to $50,000,000,000 the threshold figure 

at which regulated depository institutions are subject to direct examination and reporting requirements of the Bureau of Consumer Financial 

Protection, and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

NOVEMBER 19, 2015 

Mr. CLAY (for himself and Mr. STIVERS) introduced the following bill; which 

was referred to the Committee on Financial Services 

A BILL 

To increase from $10,000,000,000 to $50,000,000,000 the 

threshold figure at which regulated depository institutions are subject to direct examination and reporting 

requirements of the Bureau of Consumer Financial Protection, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Consumer Financial 

5 Protection Bureau Examination and Reporting Threshold 

6 Act of 2015’’. 


SSpencer on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 4099 IH

1 SEC. 2. INCREASE IN THE EXAMINATION THRESHOLD. 

2 Section 1025(a) of the Consumer Financial Protec3 tion Act of 2010 (12 U.S.C. 5515(a)) is amended by strik4 ing ‘‘$10,000,000,000’’ each place that term appears and 

5 inserting ‘‘$50,000,000,000’’. 

6 SEC. 3. INCREASE IN THE REPORTING THRESHOLD. 

7 Section 1026(a) of the Consumer Financial Protec8 tion Act of 2010 (12 U.S.C. 5516(a)) is amended by strik9 ing ‘‘$10,000,000,000’’ each place that term appears and 

10 inserting ‘‘$50,000,000,000’’. 

11 SEC. 4. EFFECTIVE DATE. 

12 This Act and the amendments made by this Act shall 

13 take effect on the date that is 45 days after the date of 

14 enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


SSpencer on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

DAY HIGH

 98

 99

 96

 95

 99

 95

 96

 105

 95

 98

 101

 106

 101

 100

 99

 101

 98

 98

 100

 100

 107

 100

 103

 108

 104

 108

 104

 107

 107

 104

 92

 92

 91

 92

 93

 93

 93

 92

 92

 92

 93

 94

 92

 95

 96

 97

 97

 97

 97

 97

 98

 97

 98

 96

 95

 104

 102

 101

 99

 102

 94

 95

 93

 93

 94

 94

 94

 94

 93

 94

 95

 99

 94

 96

 97

 99

 98

 97

 98

 98

 99

 99

 99

 100

 98

 106

 103

 102

 101

 103

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

NOVEMBER 2001 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: December 18, 2001

HIGH LOW MEAN

 60.2

 59.9

 59.9

 59.6

 59.6

 59.1

 57.9

 58.0

 58.1

 57.7

 59.9

 62.0

 60.8

 59.0

 58.9

 59.0

 58.1

 57.4

 57.1

 57.2

 57.7

 58.6

 57.6

 87.0

 56.3

 55.6

 53.9

 52.0

 53.7

 54.2

 57.7

 57.7

 57.6

 57.2

 57.3

 57.0

 55.9

 55.3

 55.7

 56.0

 57.8

 59.0

 58.0

 58.0

 57.2

 57.0

 57.2

 56.2

 55.5

 55.8

 56.7

 57.2

 56.5

 56.2

 54.9

 53.3

 51.0

 50.9

 51.4

 52.6

 59.1

 58.8

 58.8

 58.5

 58.6

 58.1

 57.1

 56.6

 57.0

 57.0

 58.8

 60.3

 58.7

 58.5

 58.0

 58.1

 57.7

 56.8

 56.4

 56.5

 57.1

 57.8

 57.1

 58.5

 55.6

 54.5

 52.1

 51.4

 52.4

 53.3

HIGH LOW MEAN

 9.1

 9.2

 9.3

 9.3

 9.3

 9.4

 9.6

 9.7

 9.7

 9.6

 9.2

 8.8

 8.8

 8.8

 9.0

 9.0

 9.0

 9.2

 9.3

 9.1

 8.8

 8.6

 8.7

 8.4

 7.9

 7.8

 9.1

 9.2

 8.7

 8.8

 8.5

 9.0

 9.0

 9.1

 9.1

 9.1

 9.2

 9.4

 9.3

 9.2

 8.7

 8.6

 8.4

 8.5

 8.7

 8.7

 8.8

 8.8

 8.9

 8.8

 8.5

 8.3

 8.4

 7.3

 7.5

 7.6

 7.7

 8.7

 7.8

 7.8

 8.9

 9.1

 9.1

 9.2

 9.2

 9.2

 9.4

 9.5

 9.5

 9.4

 9.0

 8.7

 8.5

 8.7

 8.9

 8.8

 8.9

 9.0

 9.1

 8.9

 8.7

 8.5

 8.5

 7.9

 7.7

 7.7

 8.7

 9.0

 8.4

 8.5

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

RIPON ON THE STANISLAUS RIVER

 ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS WATER TEMPERATURE, DEG DISSOLVED OXYZEN, PPM
§ 217.7 Claim filed with the Social Security Administration. ( a ) *Claim is for life benefits.* An application for life benefits under title II of the Social Security Act is an application for an annuity if the conditions either in paragraphs (a)(1), (2), and (3) or in paragraph (a)(4) of this section are met: ( 1 ) The application was filed because the applicant did not know he or she was eligible for an annuity under the Railroad Retirement Act. The Board must have or receive evidence indicating why the applicant thought that he or she lacked eligibility for an annuity.
( 2 ) The claimant would have been entitled to and would currently be entitled to an annuity under subpart B or D of part 216 of this chapter if the applicant had applied for the annuity on the date the social security application was filed.
( 3 ) The applicant asks the Board in a written statement to consider the application for social security benefits as an application for an employee or spouse annuity.
( 4 ) The application was filed because the employee had less than 10 years of creditable railroad service, and having established entitlement to social security benefits and continued working in railroad service, subsequently acquired 10 years of railroad service.
( b ) *Claim is for death benefits.* An application for death benefits under title II of the Social Security Act is an application for an annuity or lump sum if— ( 1 ) The application is filed based on the death of an employee and the Board has jurisdiction for the payment of survivor benefits based on the compensation record of the deceased employee; and
( 2 ) The claimant is eligible for an annuity or a lump-sum death payment on the date the application is filed.
#### § 408.120 Periods of limitations ending on Federal nonworkdays.

Title VIII of the Act and the regulations in this part require you to take certain actions within specified time periods or you may lose your right to a portion or all of your benefits. If any such period ends on a Saturday, Sunday, Federal legal holiday, or any other day all or part of which is declared to be a nonworkday for Federal employees by statute or Executive Order, you will have until the next Federal workday to take the prescribed action.
FIRST DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

STATE OF FLORIDA

_____________________________

No. 1D17-4270

_____________________________

MALACHI SMITH,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellee.

_____________________________

On appeal from the Circuit Court for Duval County.

Waddell A. Wallace III, Judge.

November 7, 2018

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.

ROWE, BILBREY, and WINSOR, JJ., concur.

_____________________________

Not final until disposition of any timely and 

authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 

9.331.

_____________________________
2

Malachi Smith, pro se, Appellant.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.
**EXHIBIT 32.1****WRITTEN STATEMENT OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICERPURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**The undersigned, the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of Cuisine Solutions, Inc.(the “Company”), each hereby certifies that, to his knowledge on the date hereof pursuant to 18U.S.C. Section 1350(a), as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of The Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that: (a) the Quarterly Report and Form 10-Q for the period ended April 1, 2006 filed on the datehereof by the Company with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “Report”) fullycomplies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d) of the Securities ExchangeAct of 1934, as amended; and  (b) information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and results of operations of the Company.     /s/ Stanislas Vilgrain Chief Executive Officer May 11, 2006       Stanislas Vilgrain         /s/ Yuyun Tristan Kuo Chief Financial Officer, Treasurer May 11, 2006       Yuyun Tristan Kuo and Corporate Secretary  
33
#### § 30.317 Can the FAB request a further response from the claimant or return a claim to the district office?

At any time before the issuance of its final decision, the FAB may request that the claimant submit additional evidence or argument, or return the claim to the district office for further development and/or issuance of a newly recommended decision without issuing a final decision, whether or not requested to do so by the claimant.