alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 408.420 What evidence of World War II military service do you need to give us? ( a ) *Kinds of evidence you can give us.* To show that you are a World War II veteran as defined in § 408.216, you can give us any of the documents listed in § 404.1370(b)(1) through (5) of this chapter that were issued by a U.S. Government agency. However, depending on the type of document you give us and what the document shows, we may verify your military service, or the dates of your service, with the National Personnel Records Center (NPRC) in St. Louis, Missouri. If we do, we will use the information in NPRC's records to determine whether you meet the military service requirements for SVB.
( b ) *What the evidence must show.* When you file an application for SVB, you must give us evidence of your World War II military service. The evidence you give us must show: ( 1 ) Your name;
( 2 ) The branch of service in which you served;
( 3 ) The dates of your military service;
( 4 ) Your military service serial number;
( 5 ) The character of your discharge; and
( 6 ) If your service was in the organized military forces of the Government of the Commonwealth of the Philippines (including the organized guerrilla forces), the period of your service that was under the control of U.S. Armed Forces.
###### Editorial Note on Part 416

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 416 appear at 68 FR 53509, Sept. 11, 2003.

#### § 416.1018 Notifying claimant of the disability determination.

The State agency will prepare denial notices in accordance with subpart N of this part whenever it makes a disability determination which is fully or partially unfavorable to the claimant.

[46 FR 29211, May 29, 1981, as amended at 75 FR 33169, June 11, 2010]
### §1624. Certification of awards; certification of claims

The Commission shall, as soon as possible, and in the order of the making of such awards, certify to the Secretary of the Treasury and to the Secretary of State copies of the awards made in favor of the Government of the United States or of nationals of the United States under this subchapter. The Commission shall certify to the Secretary of State, upon his request, copies of the formal submissions of claims filed pursuant to subsection (b) of section 1623 of this title for transmission to the foreign government concerned.

(Mar. 10, 1950, ch. 54, title I, §5, 64 Stat. 16; Aug. 9, 1955, ch. 645, §§1, 2, 69 Stat. 562.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

1955—Act Aug. 9, 1955, §1, amended credit to section by designating act Mar. 10, 1950, as "title I".

Act Aug. 9, 1955, §2, substituted "subchapter" for "chapter".

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### References to This Subchapter Deemed To Include Section 119 of H.R. 2076

References to this subchapter deemed to include section 119 of H.R. 2076, see section 119(b) of H.R. 2076, as enacted into law by Pub. L. 104–91, set out as an Authority of Foreign Claims Settlement Commission note under section 1644 of this title.

#### **Executive Documents**

#### Abolition of International Claims Commission and Transfer of Functions

International Claims Commission of the United States, including offices of its members, abolished and functions of Commission and of members, officers, and employees thereof transferred to Foreign Claims Settlement Commission of the United States by Reorg. Plan No. 1 of 1954, §§1, 2, 4, eff. July 1, 1954, 19 F.R. 3985, 68 Stat. 1279, set out as a note under section 1622 of this title.

For provisions transferring Foreign Claims Settlement Commission of the United States as a separate agency within the Department of Justice, see section 1622a et seq. of this title.
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Marilyn Kelly,

 Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Elizabeth A. Weaver

Maura D. Corrigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.

Stephen J. Markman

Diane M. Hathaway, Justices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

 _________________________________________ 

 Clerk

February 26, 2010 

p0222 

Order 

 

February 26, 2010 

138070 & (90) 

 

RAYMOND HENRY ANDRES, by and 

through his guardian, MARK KEVIN 

PHILLIPS, 

Plaintiff-Appellee, 

v SC: 138070 

 COA: 279608 

Wayne CC: 04-411019-NF 

STATE FARM MUTUAL AUTOMOBILE 

INSURANCE COMPANY, 

Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/ 

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the January 5, 2010 

judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not 

persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.
#### § 418.1150 When will we use your amended tax return filed with IRS?

You may provide your amended tax return for a tax year we used within 3 calendar years following the close of the tax year for which you filed the amended tax return. You must provide us with your retained copy of your amended U.S. Individual Income Tax Return on the required IRS form and a copy of the IRS letter confirming the amended tax return was filed or a transcript from IRS if they did not send a letter. If you cannot provide your retained copy of the amended tax return, you must obtain a copy of the return from IRS. We will then make any necessary retroactive corrections as defined in § 418.1110(c) to your income-related monthly adjustment amount.
#### Sarah H. Barnes and Others, Appellants, v. Midland Railroad Terminal Company, Respondent.

Motion granted. Order resettled and signed. Present —Jenks, P. J., Thomas, Carr, Stapleton and Putnam, JJ.
## F IRST 

## D ISTRICT 

## C OURT OF 

## A PPEAL 

## S TATE OF 

## F LORIDA

_____________________________
No. 1D 17

- 3230

_____________________________ A NTONIO G ARRETT , Appellant,

v.

S TATE OF F LORIDA , Appellee.

_____________________________

On appeal from the Circuit Court for Duval County

. Linda F. McCallum , Judge

. July 27, 2018

P ER C URIAM

.
A FFIRMED

.
B ILBREY , W INOKUR , and J AY , JJ., concur

.

_____________________________ Not final until disposition of any timely and authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 9.331

.

__ ___________________________2 Antonio Garrett, pro se
, Appellant.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee
, for Appellee.
<TABLE>

                                                WARRANTECH CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
                                                              EXHIBIT 11
                                            STATEMENT RE COMPUTATION OF PER SHARE EARNINGS
                                                              (UNAUDITED)

                                                         For the Three         Months Ended June 30,
                                                 --------------------------------------------------
                                                           1997                      1996
<S>                                           <C>                         <C>
Earnings:
Net Income                                       $    1,327,204             $    2,119,235
                                                 ======================     ======================

Weighted average shares outstanding
 Primary (A):

Common shares                                        13,176,344                 12,989,181

Assumed exercise of  stock options                    2,366,979                    655,271
                                                 ======================     ======================
                                                     15,543,323                 13,644,452
                                                 ======================     ======================
Fully diluted (B)
Common shares                                        13,176,344                  12,989,181

Assumed exercise of stock options                     2,485,217                      720,688
                                                 ======================     ======================
                                                     15,561,661                  13,709,869
                                                 ======================     ======================
Earnings Per Common Share:

    Primary (A)                                        $0.09                     $0.16
    Fully Diluted (B)                                  $0.08                     $0.15


(A)      The treasury method was used in the calculation of primary earnings per share for all periods    presented.

(B)      The modified treasury method was used in the calculation of fully diluted earnings per share for
         the three months ended June 30, 1997 and 1996.


</TABLE>
Editorial Note on Part 416
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 416 appear at 68 FR 53509, Sept. 11, 2003.

§ 416.1725 Effect of your failure to comply with treatment requirements for your drug addiction or alcoholism. ( a ) *Suspension of benefits.* Your eligibility for benefits will be suspended beginning with the first month after we notify you in writing that we have determined that you have failed to comply with the treatment requirements for your drug addiction or alcoholism as defined in § 416.940. Your benefits will be suspended and reinstated in accordance with the provisions in § 416.1326.
( b ) *Termination of benefits.* If your benefits are suspended for 12 consecutive months for failure to comply with treatment in accordance with § 416.1326, your eligibility for disability benefits will be terminated in accordance with § 416.1331.
[60 FR 8153, Feb. 10, 1995]
§ 320.9 Notice of erroneous benefit payment. ( a ) *Content of notice.* When an adjudicating office determines that benefits were paid erroneously, that office shall issue to the claimant a notice of the amount of the erroneous payment and the basis for the determination. The notice shall include a statement telling the claimant of his or her right to request reconsideration of the determination, of the provisions for waiver and of his or her right to request waiver.
( b ) *Communication of notice of erroneous payment.* When the adjudicating office mails the erroneous payment notice to the claimant's address of record, it shall be considered that notice of the erroneous payment has been communicated to the claimant on the date of mailing such notice. If the adjudicating office has been notified that a claimant has an attorney or other representative helping him or her with the claim, a copy of the erroneous payment notice shall be sent to the attorney or such other representative.
[53 FR 2486, Jan. 28, 1988]
Opinion issued June 2, 2015

In The

Court of Appeals 

For The 

First District of Texas 

————————————

NO. 01-14-00777-CV

———————————

HISPANIC HOUSING AND EDUCATION INFORMATION, Appellant

V.

CHICAGO TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY, Appellee

On Appeal from the 152nd District Court

Harris County, Texas

Trial Court Case No. 2012-59660

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Appellant, Hispanic Housing and Education Information, has filed a motion 

to dismiss its appeal. More than ten days have elapsed since the filing of the 

motion, and no party has objected to dismissal. See TEX. R. APP. P. 10.3(a). No 

opinion has issued in this appeal. Accordingly, we grant the motion and dismiss the 
2

appeal. See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.1(a)(1). We dismiss any other pending motions as 

moot.

PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Justices Jennings, Bland, and Brown.
#### HEMPHILL SOY PRODUCTS COMPANY, a corporation, Debtor, Appellant, v. SOUTHERN COTTON OIL COMPANY, a corporation, et al.

No. 14993.

United States Court of Appeals Eighth Circuit.

Aug. 31, 1954.

Hal McHaney, Kennett, Mo., Hartley Pollock, Jr., John Shaw and William J. Costello, St. Louis, Mo., for appellant.

John C. Vogel, St. Louis, Mo., and John Hall Dalton, Kennett, Mo., for ap-pellees.

PER CURIAM.

Appeal from District Court dismissed, on motion of appellee St. Louis Terminal Warehouse Company and motion of appellant.
EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO RULE 13a-14(b) OF THE EXCHANGE ACT AND 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ENACTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In
connection with the Quarterly Report of Intrusion Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-Q/A for the three-month period ending March 31, 2004 as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, G. Ward Paxton, Chief Executive Officer of the Company certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as enacted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

|August 6, 2004 | /s/G. WARD PAXTONG. Ward Paxton
Chief Executive Officer
|-------------- | -------------------------------------------------------

---



QuickLinks
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY HIGH

 278

 249

 252

 270

 322

 331

 387

 674

 776

 700

 689

 635

 439

 364

 363

 391

 349

 436

 540

 743

 1,019

 1,147

 983

 924

 710

 518

 364

 316

 281

 275

 322

 233

 227

 226

 229

 236

 238

 237

 238

 243

 246

 248

 247

 248

 250

 251

 250

 247

 247

 247

 249

 251

 250

 247

 251

 249

 247

 250

 253

 250

 250

 250

 242

 235

 236

 242

 254

 258

 269

 309

 338

 321

 319

 306

 280

 274

 272

 267

 263

 275

 293

 331

 388

 416

 372

 374

 320

 292

 276

 269

 260

 258

 262

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

JANUARY 2009 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: February 3, 2009

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

RIO VISTA ON THE SACRAMENTO RIVER
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 98-6842

THEODORE LEONARD SZAFRANSKI,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

L. K. KELLY, Warden, Greensville Correctional

Center; A. M. PARKER, JR., Superintendent,

Greensville Correctional Center; R. LANN, Investigator, Greensville Correctional Center;

F. SPENCE, Administrator, Greensville Correctional Center,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western

District of Virginia, at Roanoke. James C. Turk, District Judge.

(CA-98-273-R)

Submitted: January 29, 1999 Decided: March 16, 1999

Before ERVIN and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges, and PHILLIPS, Senior

Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Theodore Leonard Szafranski, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
* Generally, dismissals without prejudice are not appealable.

See Domino Sugar Corp. v. Sugar Workers Local Union 392, 10 F.3d

1064, 1066 (4th Cir. 1993). However, since amendment to Appellant’s complaint could not cure the “defects” the district court

found in his case, the district court’s dismissal is a final,

appealable order. Id. at 1066-67.

2

PER CURIAM:

Theodore Leonard Szafranski appeals from the district court’s

order dismissing his 42 U.S.C.A. § 1983 (West Supp. 1998) complaint

without prejudice* and the district court’s order denying relief on

his motion filed pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 60(b). We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and order and

find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning

of the district court. See Szafranski v. Kelly, No. CA-98-273-R

(W.D. Va. Apr. 24, 1998; June 1, 1998). We dispense with oral

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately

presented in the materials before the court and argument would not

aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY HIGH

 27,353

 23,872

 23,382

 22,308

 23,591

 25,031

 27,943

 26,960

 27,915

 28,684

 28,758

 29,617

 31,527

 31,278

 28,769

 26,124

 25,216

 24,588

 24,776

 24,423

 25,953

 26,574

 25,565

 25,769

 31,000

 24,425

 21,978

 20,556

 21,878

 18,170

 17,424

 16,495

 16,405

 15,767

 15,055

 16,237

 16,043

 17,865

 19,450

 17,908

 17,641

 18,110

 18,048

 19,359

 19,477

 14,647

 18,755

 16,946

 17,610

 16,870

 15,805

 15,405

 16,322

 15,230

 15,837

 16,311

 12,528

 11,836

 11,235

 10,727

 10,736

 10,559

 21,799

 21,305

 19,993

 19,085

 19,587

 19,940

 21,231

 22,362

 23,019

 22,798

 23,601

 24,240

 25,403

 24,525

 21,431

 22,113

 21,139

 21,101

 20,099

 19,185

 19,264

 21,021

 20,881

 20,599

 23,465

 19,681

 17,718

 16,703

 16,319

 15,613

 14,799

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

DECEMBER 2008 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: January 6, 2009

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

PORT CHICAGO TOP IN SUISUN BAY
I 

114TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 4183 

To increase the penalties for fentanyl trafficking. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

DECEMBER 3, 2015 

Mr. ROONEY of Florida (for himself and Mr. RYAN of Ohio) introduced the 

following bill; which was referred to the Committee on the Judiciary, and 

in addition to the Committee on Energy and Commerce, for a period to 

be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee 

concerned 

A BILL 

To increase the penalties for fentanyl trafficking. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Stop Trafficking in 

5 Fentanyl Act of 2015’’. 

6 SEC. 2. ENHANCED PENALTIES. 

7 Section 401(b)(1) of the Controlled Substances Act 

8 (21 U.S.C. 841(b)(1)) is amended— 

9 (1) in subparagraph (A)(vi)— 


SSpencer on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 4183 IH

1 (A) by striking ‘‘400 grams’’ and inserting 

2 ‘‘20 grams’’; and 

3 (B) by striking ‘‘100 grams’’ and inserting 

4 ‘‘5 grams’’; and 

5 (2) in subparagraph (B)(vi)— 

6 (A) by striking ‘‘40 grams’’ and inserting 

7 ‘‘2 grams’’; and 

8 (B) by striking ‘‘10 grams’’ and inserting 

9 ‘‘0.5 grams’’. 

Æ 


SSpencer on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
###### Editorial Note on Part 416

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 416 appear at 68 FR 53509, Sept. 11, 2003.

#### § 416.1494 Time and place to request further review or a hearing on revised determination or decision.

You or another party to the revised determination or decision may request, as appropriate, further review or a hearing on the revision by filing a request in writing at one of our offices within 60 days after the date you receive notice of the revision. Further review or a hearing will be held on the revision according to the rules of this subpart.
## SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK 

## Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department

**258 CA 10-01069**  PRESENT: SCUDDER, P.J., FAHEY, CARNI, GREEN, AND GORSKI, JJ.

FS KIDS, LLC, DOING BUSINESS AS BUDWEY’S FOOD MARKET, MASK FOODS, INC., VALU HOME CENTERS, INC., KBLM FOODS, INC., DOING BUSINESS AS BLASDELL JUBILEE, KDJB FOODS, INC., DOING BUSINESS AS SAVE-A-LOT ORDER LACKAWANNA, GAIGE & SON GROCERY, INC., DOING BUSINESS AS CORNING JUBILEE, TJ’S MARKET, INC., DOING BUSINESS AS HORSEHEADS JUBILEE, BB&T SUPERMARKETS INC., DOING BUSINESS AS ATTICA JUBILEE, BNR-LARSON, LLC, DOING BUSINESS AS CORFU IGA, AND GIFT EXPRESS OF NEW YORK, INC., DOING BUSINESS AS THE MARKET IN THE SQUARE, ON THEIR OWN BEHALF AND ON BEHALF OF ALL OTHERS SIMILARLY SITUATED AS THEY, AS FORMER EMPLOYEE MEMBERS/PARTICIPANTS IN THE WHOLESALE AND RETAIL WORKERS’ COMPENSATION TRUST OF NEW YORK, PLAINTIFFS-RESPONDENTS,

V

COMPENSATION RISK MANAGERS, LLC, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT. (APPEAL NO. 2.)

HITCHCOCK & CUMMINGS, LLP, NEW YORK CITY (CHRISTOPHER B. HITCHCOCK OF COUNSEL), AND CONNORS & VILARDO, LLP, BUFFALO, FOR DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.

PHILLIPS LYTLE LLP, BUFFALO (KENNETH A. MANNING OF COUNSEL), FOR PLAINTIFFS-RESPONDENTS.

Appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Erie County (John M. Curran, J.), entered April 14, 2010 in a breach of contract action. The order, among other things, denied in part defendant’s motion to dismiss plaintiffs’ second amended complaint.

It is hereby ORDERED that the order so appealed from is unanimously affirmed without costs for reasons stated in the decision at Supreme Court.

Entered: March 25, 2011 Patricia L. Morgan Clerk of the Court
Walla Walla RD, Cobbler II Project Planning Area

Existing Forest Plan Appendix C Inventoried Roadless Areas

and 2001 Roadless Rule

Legend

Cobbler II Project Planning Area

District Boundary

Forest Roads

Grande Ronde IRA

Wenaha-Tucannon Wilderness

Cobbler II Project Planning Area - Inventory of Potential Wilderness Areas

Map H-3: Project Planning Area

H-3

2 1 0 2 Miles  ́
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

DAY HIGH

 12,882

 11,572

 10,443

 9,547

 9,805

 10,293

 11,126

 11,591

 11,732

 11,587

 10,969

 10,067

 8,819

 7,072

 6,741

 6,236

 5,491

 5,716

 6,811

 9,297

 7,600

 10,380

 9,605

 9,554

 12,020

 11,056

 9,497

 9,355

 5,612

 5,346

 4,266

 3,125

 2,589

 2,490

 2,478

 2,583

 2,713

 2,614

 2,674

 2,534

 2,578

 2,178

 2,126

 1,896

 1,615

 1,424

 1,379

 1,369

 1,285

 1,548

 2,123

 2,260

 2,203

 2,667

 2,436

 2,796

 8,968

 7,912

 6,549

 5,395

 5,072

 5,265

 5,524

 5,922

 6,305

 6,189

 5,742

 5,728

 5,366

 4,392

 4,162

 3,394

 2,834

 2,702

 3,035

 4,480

 3,896

 5,066

 5,854

 6,050

 6,084

 6,301

 5,729

 5,530

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

FEBRUARY 2021 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: March 8, 2021

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

PITTSBURG TOP ON THE SACRAMENTO RIVER
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Stephen J. Sanzone, Appellant.

Judgment of the County Court, Queens County, convicting the defendant of the crimes of robbery in the first degree, grand larceny in the second degree and assault in the second degree, committed as a second offender, unanimously affirmed.

No opinion. Present — Lewis, P. J., Carswell, Johnston, Adel and Wenzel, JJ.
(No. 6833

#### Richard D. Corley, M.D., Claimant, *vs.*State of Illinois, Division of Vocational Rehabilitation, Respondent.

*Opinion filed May 8, 1973.*

Dr. Richard D. Corley, Claimant, pro se.

William J. Scott, Attorney General; William E. Webber, Assistant Attorney General, for Respondent.

Per Curiam.