alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY HIGH

 209

 285

 165

 306

 278

 245

 265

 236

 273

 243

 192

 178

 183

 196

 216

 190

 194

 266

 223

 218

 207

 218

 252

 253

 272

 234

 282

 278

 227

 199

 260

 163

 163

 161

 160

 158

 156

 153

 150

 149

 147

 149

 144

 142

 138

 145

 147

 143

 142

 146

 148

 145

 149

 150

 151

 148

 143

 145

 147

 148

 144

 144

 172

 180

 163

 179

 169

 171

 175

 169

 169

 165

 154

 150

 148

 153

 157

 155

 155

 165

 157

 160

 158

 162

 173

 176

 177

 165

 172

 173

 161

 159

 168

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

OCTOBER 2000 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: November 3, 2000

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

RIO VISTA ON THE SACRAMENTO RIVER
PUBLIC LAW 111–363—JAN. 4, 2011 124 STAT. 4055 

LEGISLATIVE HISTORY—H.R. 5655: 

CONGRESSIONAL RECORD, Vol. 156 (2010): 

Nov. 16, considered and passed House. 

Dec. 16, considered and passed Senate. 

Æ 

Public Law 111–363 

111th Congress 

An Act 

To designate the Little River Branch facility of the United States Postal Service 

located at 140 NE 84th Street in Miami, Florida, as the ‘‘Jesse J. McCrary, 

Jr. Post Office’’. 

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of 

the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

SECTION 1. JESSE J. MCCRARY, JR. POST OFFICE. 

(a) DESIGNATION.—The Little River Branch facility of the 

United States Postal Service located at 140 NE 84th Street in 

Miami, Florida, shall be known and designated as the ‘‘Jesse J. 

McCrary, Jr. Post Office’’. 

(b) REFERENCES.—Any reference in a law, map, regulation, 

document, paper, or other record of the United States to the facility 

referred to in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a reference 

to the ‘‘Jesse J. McCrary, Jr. Post Office’’. 

Approved January 4, 2011. 

Jan. 4, 2011 

[H.R. 5655] 


dkrause on GSDDPC29PROD with PUBLIC LAWS
§ 404.911 Good cause for missing the deadline to request review. ( a ) In determining whether you have shown that you had good cause for missing a deadline to request review we consider— ( 1 ) What circumstances kept you from making the request on time;
( 2 ) Whether our action misled you;
( 3 ) Whether you did not understand the requirements of the Act resulting from amendments to the Act, other legislation, or court decisions; and
( 4 ) Whether you had any physical, mental, educational, or linguistic limitations (including any lack of facility with the English language) which prevented you from filing a timely request or from understanding or knowing about the need to file a timely request for review.
( b ) Examples of circumstances where good cause may exist include, but are not limited to, the following situations: ( 1 ) You were seriously ill and were prevented from contacting us in person, in writing, or through a friend, relative, or other person.
( 2 ) There was a death or serious illness in your immediate family.
( 3 ) Important records were destroyed or damaged by fire or other accidental cause.
( 4 ) You were trying very hard to find necessary information to support your claim but did not find the information within the stated time periods.
( 5 ) You asked us for additional information explaining our action within the time limit, and within 60 days of receiving the explanation you requested reconsideration or a hearing, or within 30 days of receiving the explanation you requested Appeal Council review or filed a civil suit.
( 6 ) We gave you incorrect or incomplete information about when and how to request administrative review or to file a civil suit.
( 7 ) You did not receive notice of the determination or decision.
( 8 ) You sent the request to another Government agency in good faith within the time limit and the request did not reach us until after the time period had expired.
( 9 ) Unusual or unavoidable circumstances exist, including the circumstances described in paragraph (a)(4) of this section, which show that you could not have known of the need to file timely, or which prevented you from filing timely.
[45 FR 52081, Aug. 5, 1980, as amended at 59 FR 1634, Jan. 12, 1994]
Exhibit 23.1

Consent of Ryder Scott Company, L.P.

As independent
petroleum engineers, we hereby consent to the incorporation by reference of our
Firms name and our Firms review of the proved oil and gas reserve quantities
as of December 31, 2007 in the following Form 10-Ks of Ridgewood Energy
Corporation:

|                             
|-----------------------------
|Ridgewood
 Energy K Fund, LLC
|Ridgewood
 Energy L Fund, LLC
|Ridgewood
 Energy M Fund, LLC
|Ridgewood
 Energy O Fund, LLC
|Ridgewood
 Energy P Fund, LLC
|Ridgewood
 Energy Q Fund, LLC
|Ridgewood
 Energy S Fund, LLC
|Ridgewood
 Energy T Fund, LLC

|                | /s/ Ryder
 Scott Company, L.P.
|--------------- | ------------------------------
|                |                               
|                | Ryder Scott
 Company, L.P.    
|                |                               
|March 11,
 2008 |                               
|                |                               

---
(No. 6627

#### Fruehauf Corporation, Claimant, *vs.*State of Illinois, Department of Transportation, Respondent.

*Opinion filed July 14, 1972.*

Cassidy and Cassidy, Attorney for Claimant.

William J. Scott, Attorney General; William E. Webber, Assistant Attorney General, for Respondent.

Berlin, C.J.
Electrical Conductivity, UMHOS

Day High Low Mean

1 0 0 0

2 0 0 0

3 0 0 0

4 0 0 0

5 0 0 0

6 0 0 0

7 0 0 0

8 0 0 0

9 0 0 0

10 0 0 0

11 0 0 0

12 0 0 0

13 0 0 0

14 0 0 0

15 0 0 0

16 0 0 0

17 0 0 0

18 0 0 0

19 0 0 0

20 0 0 0

21 0 0 0

22 0 0 0

23 0 0 0

24 0 0 0

25 0 0 0

26 0 0 0

27 0 0 0

28 0 0 0

29 0 0 0

30 0 0 0

COMMENT(S): 0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

Historical Archive and Report Database

Pittsburg Top On The Sacramento River

Run Date: 5/2/2024

April 2024
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

DAY HIGH

 189

 190

 200

 289

 259

 312

 673

 1,040

 1,128

 1,133

 987

 546

 472

 361

 309

 294

 295

 527

 979

 1,719

 2,136

 2,471

 1,810

 1,558

 1,291

 864

 1,026

 896

 755

 923

 177

 178

 181

 185

 205

 207

 210

 249

 250

 258

 245

 245

 230

 226

 233

 230

 224

 223

 232

 259

 295

 388

 343

 331

 315

 290

 295

 287

 279

 262

 180

 183

 188

 207

 228

 241

 380

 417

 450

 445

 400

 326

 293

 277

 253

 258

 247

 284

 378

 542

 658

 876

 673

 671

 606

 496

 543

 509

 483

 436

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

APRIL 2016 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: May 11, 2016

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

PITTSBURG TOP ON THE SACRAMENTO RIVER
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

DAY HIGH

 173

 171

 198

 203

 0

 0

 235

 247

 246

 210

 211

 212

 195

 197

 184

 185

 201

 181

 168

 143

 129

 130

 135

 136

 139

 133

 135

 135

 144

 132

 117

 117

 121

 125

 0

 0

 138

 135

 111

 107

 110

 112

 110

 105

 103

 99

 103

 106

 100

 93

 87

 86

 84

 89

 89

 90

 90

 88

 85

 83

 148

 146

 153

 160

 0

 0

 183

 189

 186

 164

 164

 164

 153

 157

 149

 140

 152

 155

 141

 121

 114

 116

 120

 122

 123

 119

 118

 117

 118

 117

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

APRIL 2017 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: May 3, 2017

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

RIO VISTA ON THE SACRAMENTO RIVER
Exhibit 99.2

[LOGO] KPMG

                      KPMG LLP
                      Suite 2000
                      355 South Grand Avenue
                      Los Angeles, CA 90071-1568





                         Independent Accountants' Report

The Board of Directors and Stockholder
Option One Mortgage Corporation:

We have examined management's assertion, included in the accompanying management
assertion, that Option One Mortgage Corporation complied with the minimum
servicing standards set forth in the Mortgage Bankers Association of America's
Uniform Single Attestation Program for Mortgage Bankers as of and for the year
ended December 31, 2005. Management is responsible for Option One Mortgage
Corporation's compliance with those minimum servicing standards. Our
responsibility is to express an opinion on management's assertion about the
Company's compliance based on our examination.

Our examination was conducted in accordance with attestation standards
established by the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants and,
accordingly, including examining, on a test basis, evidence about Option One
Mortgage Corporation's compliance with the minimum servicing standards specified
above and performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the
circumstances. We believe that our examination provides a reasonable basis for
our opinion. Our examination does not provide a legal determination on Option
One Mortgage Corporation's compliance with the minimum servicing standards.

In our opinion, management's assertion that Option One Mortgage Corporation
complied with the aforementioned minimum servicing standards as of and for the
year ended December 31, 2005 is fairly stated in all material respects.

                                  /s/ KPMG LLP

Los Angeles, California
February 28, 2006

          KPMG LLP, a U.S. limited liability partnership, is the U.S.
             member firm of KPMG International, a Swiss cooperative.


<PAGE>

[LOGO](R) OPTION ONE                                        [LOGO] H&R BLOCK(R)
          MORTGAGE
an H&R BLOCK company

                              Management Assertion

As of and for the year ended December 31, 2005, Option One Mortgage Corporation
Complied in all material respects with the minimum servicing standards set forth
in the Mortgage Bankers Association of America's Uniform Single Attestation
Program for Mortgage Bankers. As of and for this same period, Option One
Mortgage Corporation had in effect a fidelity bond and errors and omissions
policy in the amounts of $70,000,000 and $10,000,000, respectively.



/s/ Robert E. Dubrish
--------------------------------------------
Robert E. Dubrish, Chief Executive Officer


/s/ William L. O'Neill
--------------------------------------------
William L. O'Neill, Chief Financial Officer


/s/ Matthew A. Engel
--------------------------------------------
Matthew A. Engel, Controller


/s/ Fabiola Camperi
--------------------------------------------
Fabiola Camperi, Chief Servicing Officer


www.optiononeonline.com
# C_2012196EN.01001501.xml

| 4.7.2012 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 196/15 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

4.7.2012

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 196/15

---

Commission notice pursuant to Article 16(4) of Regulation (EC) No 1008/2008 of the European Parliament and of the Council on common rules for the operation of air services in the Community

Public service obligations in respect of scheduled air services

2012/C 196/09

| Member State | Spain |
| --- | --- |
| Route concerned | Menorca–Madrid |
| Date of entry into force of the public service obligations | Date of publication of this notice |
| Address where the text and any relevant information and/or documentation related to the public service obligation can be obtained | Ministerio de Fomento (Ministry of Internal Development) |
| Dirección General de Aviación Civil (Directorate-General of Civil Aviation) |
| Subdirección General de Transporte Aéreo (Subdirectorate-General of Air Transport) |
| Paseo de la Castellana, 67 |
| 28071 Madrid |
| ESPAÑA |
| Tel. +34 915978454 |
| Fax +34 915978643 |
| E-mail: osp.dgac@fomento.es |

Member State

Spain

Route concerned

Menorca–Madrid

Date of entry into force of the public service obligations

Date of publication of this notice

Address where the text and any relevant information and/or documentation related to the public service obligation can be obtained

Ministerio de Fomento (Ministry of Internal Development)

Dirección General de Aviación Civil (Directorate-General of Civil Aviation)

Subdirección General de Transporte Aéreo (Subdirectorate-General of Air Transport)

Paseo de la Castellana, 67

28071 Madrid

ESPAÑA

Tel. +34 915978454

Fax +34 915978643

E-mail: osp.dgac@fomento.es

---
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

DAY HIGH

 100

 101

 96

 93

 92

 97

 95

 100

 94

 87

 82

 88

 87

 83

 83

 82

 82

 82

 83

 81

 95

 99

 86

 84

 93

 75

 82

 83

 73

 82

 79

 79

 78

 78

 78

 78

 77

 76

 77

 83

 83

 81

 81

 80

 80

 80

 79

 79

 78

 82

 78

 81

 68

 68

 75

 78

 82

 85

 82

 81

 81

 81

 81

 82

 82

 79

 79

 85

 85

 83

 82

 81

 81

 81

 81

 80

 82

 90

 80

 82

 76

 70

 79

 80

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

FEBRUARY 2007 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: March 8, 2007

HIGH LOW MEAN

 49.9

 50.6

 50.0

 50.8

 51.4

 51.9

 51.7

 51.8

 52.4

 54.2

 54.7

 54.4

 53.2

 52.7

 53.5

 54.2

 54.9

 54.9

 54.2

 53.4

 53.8

 53.7

 52.8

 52.6

 52.8

 52.1

 52.5

 52.7

 48.8

 49.2

 48.2

 48.7

 49.4

 50.0

 51.0

 50.8

 51.5

 52.0

 53.6

 52.5

 52.2

 50.7

 51.0

 51.7

 52.4

 53.0

 52.0

 51.1

 51.6

 52.4

 50.9

 50.1

 51.7

 51.5

 51.0

 51.2

 49.4

 49.9

 49.3

 49.8

 50.4

 51.0

 51.4

 51.4

 51.9

 52.8

 54.1

 53.3

 52.7

 51.8

 52.3

 53.1

 53.7

 54.0

 53.2

 52.5

 52.9

 53.1

 51.9

 51.5

 52.3

 51.8

 51.7

 51.8

HIGH LOW MEAN

 10.6

 10.5

 10.7

 10.6

 10.5

 10.4

 10.2

 10.1

 10.0

 9.8

 9.5

 9.8

 9.8

 10.1

 10.2

 10.0

 9.8

 9.7

 9.8

 10.0

 9.9

 9.8

 9.9

 10.1

 9.8

 9.8

 9.8

 9.7

 10.2

 10.3

 10.5

 10.3

 10.2

 10.1

 9.9

 9.8

 9.7

 9.2

 9.3

 9.5

 9.7

 9.9

 9.8

 9.7

 9.5

 9.4

 9.5

 9.7

 9.6

 9.4

 9.4

 9.8

 9.6

 9.6

 9.6

 9.5

 10.4

 10.4

 10.6

 10.5

 10.4

 10.3

 10.1

 10.0

 9.8

 9.6

 9.4

 9.6

 9.8

 10.0

 10.1

 9.9

 9.7

 9.6

 9.7

 9.9

 9.8

 9.5

 9.7

 9.9

 9.7

 9.7

 9.7

 9.6

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

RIPON ON THE STANISLAUS RIVER

 ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS WATER TEMPERATURE, DEG DISSOLVED OXYZEN, PPM
§ 404.2015 Information considered in determining whether to make representative payments. In determining whether to make representative payment we consider the following information: ( a ) *Court determinations.* If we learn that a beneficiary has been found to be legally incompetent, a certified copy of the court's determination will be the basis of our determination to make representative payment.
( b ) *Medical evidence.* When available, we will use medical evidence to determine if a beneficiary is capable of managing or directing the management of benefit payments. For example, a statement by a physician or other medical professional based upon his or her recent examination of the beneficiary and his or her knowledge of the beneficiary's present condition will be used in our determination, if it includes information concerning the nature of the beneficiary's illness, the beneficiary's chances for recovery and the opinion of the physician or other medical professional as to whether the beneficiary is able to manage or direct the management of benefit payments.
( c ) *Other evidence.* We will also consider any statements of relatives, friends and other people in a position to know and observe the beneficiary, which contain information helpful to us in deciding whether the beneficiary is able to manage or direct the management of benefit payments.
```

[113th Congress Public Law 202]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]

[[Page 128 STAT. 2069]]

Public Law 113-202
113th Congress

                            Joint Resolution

 
 Making further continuing appropriations for fiscal year 2015, and for 
       other purposes. <<NOTE: Dec. 12, 2014 -  [H.J. Res. 130]>> 

    Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United 
States of America in Congress assembled, That the Continuing 
Appropriations Resolution, 2015 (Public Law 113-164) is amended by 
striking the date specified in section <<NOTE: Ante, p. 1868.>>  106(3) 
and inserting ``December 13, 2014''.

    Approved December 12, 2014.

LEGISLATIVE HISTORY--H.J. Res. 130:
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

CONGRESSIONAL RECORD, Vol. 160 (2014):
            Dec. 11, considered and passed House and Senate.

                                  <all>
```
February 2024

STORAGE INFLOW- C.F.S. RELEASE - C.F.S. GAINS(+)

ACRE-FEET O'NEILL S.LUIS CALIF. O'NEILL

S.LUIS DOS AMIGOS * OR LOSS

(-)

DAY ELEV IN LAKE CHANGE PUMPING GEN. AQUEDUCT GEN. PUMPING PUMPING DELIV. C.F.S.

44,688

1 220.95 45,629 941 2,426 0 907 0 0 2,897 38

2 221.03 45,839 210 2,273 0 822 0 0 3,040 51

3 221.49 47,046 1,207 2,775 0 739 0 0 3,003 98

4 222.16 48,810 1,764 3,228 525 916 0 757 3,277 255

5 223.48 52,330 3,520 3,053 448 1,164 0 757 2,548 414

6 223.27 51,768 -562 3,154 0 4,214 1 4,601 2,476 -573

7 223.48 52,330 562 3,353 0 3,778 0 4,933 2,556 642

8 223.89 53,431 1,101 3,290 0 3,446 0 3,993 2,251 63

9 223.62 52,705 -726 3,291 0 3,791 0 4,621 2,678 -150

10 222.03 48,464 -4,241 3,305 0 4,158 0 6,526 2,881 -195

11 221.60 47,336 -1,128 3,304 0 4,315 0 5,437 2,722 -28

12 221.54 47,178 -158 3,410 0 2,993 0 3,727 2,925 169

13 222.09 48,624 1,446 3,159 0 3,189 0 2,599 3,056 37

14 221.30 46,547 -2,077 3,048 0 2,930 0 4,065 2,778 -183

15 221.00 45,760 -787 3,127 0 3,165 0 3,444 3,080 -164

16 221.51 47,099 1,339 3,269 0 3,278 0 2,618 3,425 170

17 222.16 48,810 1,711 3,230 0 2,327 0 2,095 2,915 316

18 222.30 49,182 372 3,213 0 2,077 0 2,087 2,979 -37

19 222.75 50,379 1,197 3,253 0 2,106 0 2,087 2,819 149

20 223.07 51,233 854 3,392 0 2,503 0 2,618 2,918 71

21 222.63 50,060 -1,173 3,165 0 3,188 0 4,156 2,830 41

22 221.53 47,152 -2,908 2,993 0 3,577 0 4,143 3,872 -21

23 221.61 47,362 210 2,871 0 4,091 0 2,660 4,201 5

24 221.34 46,653 -709 2,878 0 3,955 0 2,793 4,477 79

25 220.65 44,844 -1,809 3,069 0 3,346 0 3,030 4,248 -49

26 220.17 43,593 -1,251 3,094 0 3,197 0 2,932 4,022 32

27 220.65 44,844 1,251 2,726 0 3,074 0 1,452 4,015 297

28 220.55 44,583 -261 2,761 0 2,964 0 2,108 3,938 190

29 220.95 45,629 1,046 2,933 0 3,058 0 1,450 4,282 270

TOTALS 941 89,043 973 83,268 1 81,689 93,109 1,987

ACRE-FEET 941 176,615 1,929 165,159 1 162,028 184,678 164 3,945

* DAILY DEL. FIGURES UNAVAILABLE. TOT. DEL. IS INCLUDED IN COMPUTING MONTHLY TOTALS

SUMMARY

Release (ACRE-FEET)

O'Neill Generation 1 Dos Amigos Pump 184,678

San Luis Pump 162,028 Deliveries 164

Total 346871

Historical Archive and Report Database

Consolidated State-Federal O'Neill Forebay 

Daily Operations

Run Date: 4/26/2024
### API M**eeting with EPA on October 22, 2015**  **List of Attendees**

**No. Name**  **Affiliation State**  1. Bruce Moore EPA NC 2. Tom Monahan XTO TX 3. Grover Campbell Devon OK 4. Jason Zapalac Anadarko TX 5. Angela Zivkovich Anadarko TX 6. Jeff Adams BP TX 7. Jenny

Yang ConocoPhillips TX 8. Jim Cooper Chesapeake OH 9. Adam Berig Encana CO 10. Shankar Ananthakrishna Chevron TX 11. Vanessa Ryan Chevron CA 12. Dennis Newman Oxy TX 13. John Wagner API DC 14. Matt Todd API DC 15. Phil Norwood ERM NC 16. Cheryl Vetter EPA NC 17. Amy

Hambrick EPA NC 18. Erin Tullos Exxon Mobile TX 19. Mathew Witosky EPA NC 20. Lisa Thompson EPA NC 21. Greg Nizich EPA NC 22. Charlene Spells EPA NC 23. Nica Hoshijo WPX CO 24. Jim Callan WPX CO 25. Bob King WPX CO
**Attended via Phone** 26. Joanne O’Loughlin EC/R Inc. NC 27. DavidHendricks EC/R Inc. NC 28. Suzie Waltzer EPA D.C. 29. Carey

Bylin EPA D.C. 30. JameelAlsalam EPA D.C.
EXHIBIT 32.1

OFFICERS SECTION 1350 CERTIFICATIONS

Each of the undersigned officers of Transcontinental
Realty Investors, Inc., a Nevada corporation (the Company) hereby certifies that:



| | (i) | The Companys Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the six months ended June 30, 2007, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange
Act of 1934, as amended, and
| | --- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (ii) | The information contained in the Companys Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the six months ended June 30, 2007, fairly presents in all material respects, the financial
condition and results of operations of the Company, at and for the periods indicated.
| | ---- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                      |  |  |  |                                                                    
|--------------------- |  |  |  | -------------------------------------------------------------------
|Date: August 14, 2007 |  |  |  | /s/ Daniel J. Moos                                                 
|                      |  |  |  | Daniel J. Moos                                                     
|                      |  |  |  | President and Chief Operating Officer (Principal
Executive Officer)



|                      |  |  |  |                                                     
|--------------------- |  |  |  | ----------------------------------------------------
|Date: August 14, 2007 |  |  |  | /s/ Steven A. Abney                                 
|                      |  |  |  | Steven A. Abney                                     
|                      |  |  |  | Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
|                      |  |  |  | (Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 99-6755

ANTHONY JEROME FENNELL, Petitioner - Appellant, versus STEPHEN D. MULLER, Respondent - Appellee.Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Malcolm J. Howard, District Judge. (CA-98-489-5-HC-H) Submitted: September 30, 1999 Decided: October 7, 1999 Before NIEMEYER, WILLIAMS, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Anthony Jerome Fennell, Appellant Pro Se. Clarence Joe DelForge, III, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF NORTH CAROLINA, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: Anthony Jerome Fennell seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying relief on his petition filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2254(West 1994 & Supp. 1999). We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. See Fennell v. Muller , No. CA-98-489-5-HC-H (E.D.N.C. May 6, 1999). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED