alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
ltbr_ex104.htm

EXHIBIT 10.4
  
 [*****] Portions of this exhibit have been redacted pursuant to a confidential treatment request. An unredacted version of this exhibit has been filed separately with the Commission.
  
 AMENDMENT NUMBER TWO
  
 TO THE OPERATING AGREEMENT OF ENFISSION, LLC
  
 This Amendment Number Two (“Amendment Two”) to the January 25, 2018 Operating Agreement (“OA”) of Enfission, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company (the “Company”), amends the existing OA and shall be deemed effective as of the original signing date of the Operating Agreement, January 25, 2018.
  
 In accordance with OA Section 7.6(a), Lightbridge Corporation and Framatome Inc., (each a “Member” and collectively, all of the “Members” of the Company) hereby approve the following Amendments to the OA (double underline indicates added language and strikethrough indicates deleted language):
  
 1. Section 4.2 (Additional Capital Contributions) [. • .]
  
 (f) The Initial Members agree that their cash and/or non-cash contributions to the Company will be made in such a manner that their capital accounts ultimately will be balanced. [*****]
  
 This Amendment Two may be executed by the Members in one or more counterparts, all of which shall be considered one and the same, and all of which shall have an effective date of January 25, 2018. All other sections of the OA in effect prior to this Amendment Two shall continue in full force and effect, and all actions taken by the Enfission Board of Directors and Enfission Management consistent with the terms of this Amendment Two are hereby ratified and confirmed.
  
 [Signature page follows.]
   	 
	1
	 
 
	 


  
 [*****] Portions of this exhibit have been redacted pursuant to a confidential treatment request. An unredacted version of this exhibit has been filed separately with the Commission.
  
 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned, who are all of the Members of the Company, intending to be legally bound, have executed this Amendment Two as of the date(s) set forth below, with such Amendment Two to be effective as of January 25, 2018.
  
 LIGHTBRIDGE CORPORATION
  
 	 By: 
	 /s/ Seth Grae 
	  
	 Date: September 13, 2018

	 Name:
	 Seth Grae
	  
	  

	 Title:
	 President and Chief Executive Officer
	  
	

  
 FRAMATOME INC.
  
 	 By: 
	 /s/ Robert Freeman 
	  
	 Date: September 13, 2018

	 Name:
	 Robert Freeman
	  
	  

	Title: 	 Vice President, Fuel Commercial and Customer Center


  
  
  	2
Exhibit
      32




CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO


18
      U.S.C.
      SECTION 1350


AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




In
      connection with the Annual Report of Chardan South China Acquisition Corp.
      (the
“Company”) on Form 10-KSB for the year ended December 31, 2006 as filed with the
      Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), the
      undersigned, in the capacities and on the dates indicated below, hereby
      certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section
      906
      of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:




1.  The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




2.  The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operation of the Company.


April
                    16, 2007
                  
                  /s/ Richard
                    D. PropperRichard
                    D. PropperChief
                    Financial Officer
### §9532. Commissioner for Education Research

The Research Center shall be headed by a Commissioner for Education Research (in this part referred to as the "Research Commissioner") who shall have substantial knowledge of the activities of the Research Center, including a high level of expertise in the fields of research and research management.

(Pub. L. 107–279, title I, §132, Nov. 5, 2002, 116 Stat. 1954.)
#### § 320.28 Record of evidence considered.

The hearings officer will make a record of the material evidence. The record will include the applications, written statements, reports, and other documents that were used in making the determination under review and any other additional evidence the appellant or any other party to the hearing presents in writing. If a hearing was held in the appeal, the tape recording of the hearing will be part of the record while the appeal is pending. The hearings officer's decision will be based on the record. The entire record at any time during the pendency of the appeal shall be available for examination by any party or by his or her duly authorized representative.

[67 FR 77157, Dec. 17, 2002]
#### Oscar Miles, Respondent, v. John D. Miller, Appellant.

Judgment and order unanimously affirmed, with costs.
### §§1926, 1927. Repealed. Pub. L. 87–195, pt. III, §642(a)(2), Sept. 4, 1961, 75 Stat. 460

Section 1926, acts Aug. 26, 1954, ch. 937, ch. II, §406, 68 Stat. 844; July 8, 1955, ch. 301, §8(e), 69 Stat. 286; July 18, 1956, ch. 627, §8(e), 70 Stat. 558; Aug. 14, 1957, Pub. L. 85–141, §8(f), 71 Stat. 361; June 30, 1958, Pub. L. 85–477, ch. II, §205(e), 72 Stat. 266; July 24, 1959, Pub. L. 86–108, ch. II, §205(f), 73 Stat. 250; May 14, 1960, Pub. L. 86–472, ch. II, §204(g), 74 Stat. 137, authorized appropriations for United Nations Children's Fund.

Section 1927, acts Aug. 26, 1954, ch. 937, ch. II, §407, 68 Stat. 844; July 8, 1955, ch. 301, §8(f), 69 Stat. 286; July 18, 1956, ch. 627, §8(f), 70 Stat. 558; Aug. 14, 1957, Pub. L. 85–141, §8(g), 71 Stat. 361; June 30, 1958, Pub. L. 85–477, ch. II, §205(f), 72 Stat. 266; July 24, 1959, Pub. L. 86–108, ch. II, §205(g), 73 Stat. 250; May 14, 1960, Pub. L. 86–472, ch. II, §204(h), 74 Stat. 137, authorized appropriations for contributions to Palestine refugees in Near East. See section 2221 of this title.
## COURT OF APPEALS

SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS

FORT WORTH

NO. 02

- 14

- 00118

- CR

Jose Gonzalo Ferman a/k/a Jose

Gonzalez Ferman

v.

The State of Texas §

§

§

§

§ From Criminal District Court No. 4

o f Tarrant County (1333709D )

May 15, 2014

P er C uriam

(nfp)



### JUDGMENT

This court has considered the record on appeal in this case and holds that

the appeal should be dismissed. I t is ordered that the appeal is dismissed.

SECOND DISTRICT COURT OF APPEALS

PER CURIAM
#### § 404.1921 Benefits of less than $1 due.

If the monthly benefit amount due an individual (or several individuals, e.g., children, where several benefits are combined in one check) as a result of a claim filed under an agreement is less than $1, the benefits may be accumulated until they equal or exceed $5.
§ 364.4 Placement of missing children posters in Board field offices. ( a ) *Poster content.* The National Center for Missing and Exploited Children shall select the missing child and the pertinent information about that child, which may include a photograph of the child, that will appear on the poster. The Board will develop a standard format for these posters.
( b ) *Transmission of posters to field offices.* The Board shall send the posters to its field offices in penalty mail. Those posters will be included in penalty mailings that are made in the normal course of the Board's operations.
( c ) *Field office use of posters.* ( 1 ) Upon receipt of the poster, the field office will place it in the waiting room, if possible. Otherwise, the field office should put the poster in a place where it will be viewed by the public.
( 2 ) The field office must remove and destroy the posters by the end of their shelf life. The field office also may remove posters that they believe have ceased to be of assistance in locating and recovering missing children.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

DAY HIGH

 212

 210

 206

 202

 199

 195

 265

 230

 193

 190

 186

 181

 180

 173

 175

 175

 173

 169

 167

 167

 167

 167

 169

 169

 166

 167

 196

 192

 168

 163

 201

 202

 201

 197

 192

 185

 181

 192

 182

 173

 174

 167

 163

 162

 158

 163

 164

 162

 162

 158

 160

 157

 159

 159

 156

 156

 154

 155

 154

 153

 206

 206

 203

 200

 196

 190

 210

 201

 188

 183

 180

 176

 172

 168

 167

 167

 168

 166

 164

 163

 162

 162

 163

 163

 161

 161

 167

 173

 163

 159

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

APRIL 2019 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: May 6, 2019

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

PITTSBURG BOTTOM ON THE SACRAMENTO RIVER
**EXHIBIT 31.2****Certification of Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**I, Bradley Bertouille, certify that:1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of Standard Aero Holdings, Inc.; 2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untruestatement of a material fact or omit to state a material factnecessary to make the statements made, in light of thecircumstances under which such statements were made, notmisleading with respect to the period covered by this report; 3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and otherfinancial information included in this report, fairly present inall material respects the financial condition, results ofoperations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, theperiods presented in this report; 4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsiblefor establishing and maintaining disclosure controls andprocedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have: a. Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused suchdisclosure controls and procedures to be designed under oursupervision, to ensure that material information relating to theregistrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made knownto us by others within those entities, particularly during theperiod in which this report is being prepared;  b. Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosurecontrols and procedures and presented in this report ourconclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls andprocedures, as of the end of the period covered by the reportbased on such evaluation; and  c. Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internalcontrol over financial reporting that occurred during theregistrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourthfiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that hasmaterially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect,the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed,based on our most recent evaluation of internal control overfinancial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the auditcommittee of the registrant’s board of directors (or personsperforming the equivalent functions): a. All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the designor operation of internal control over financial reporting whichare reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s abilityto record, process, summarize and report financial information;and  b. Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management orother employees who have a significant role in the registrant’sinternal control over financial reporting.   Dated:April 14, 2006     /s/ Bradley Bertouille     Bradley Bertouille  Chief Financial Officer
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY HIGH

 20,235

 20,124

 20,072

 19,110

 17,487

 17,240

 17,135

 17,023

 17,884

 17,829

 18,022

 17,191

 17,203

 17,315

 16,863

 18,107

 17,295

 17,862

 17,640

 16,743

 17,037

 17,396

 18,265

 19,521

 16,505

 20,585

 21,264

 20,935

 20,955

 20,675

 20,524

 9,160

 9,217

 8,903

 9,350

 9,108

 8,829

 8,296

 9,158

 8,473

 7,843

 7,863

 7,403

 7,132

 7,626

 7,959

 8,224

 8,650

 8,620

 8,794

 9,207

 8,429

 8,532

 9,907

 10,362

 9,007

 10,578

 10,437

 9,860

 9,091

 10,761

 9,695

 14,170

 13,932

 13,919

 13,637

 12,991

 12,404

 12,137

 12,121

 12,047

 11,602

 11,941

 11,792

 11,396

 11,832

 11,979

 12,350

 12,755

 13,134

 13,177

 13,172

 12,619

 12,911

 13,532

 13,825

 12,218

 14,947

 15,234

 14,912

 14,860

 15,132

 14,637

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

JANUARY 2014 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: June 6, 2014

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

PITTSBURG TOP ON THE SACRAMENTO RIVER
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY HIGH

 372

 465

 570

 657

 654

 394

 334

 324

 330

 360

 302

 285

 302

 417

 731

 1,098

 1,754

 2,528

 2,158

 1,377

 990

 789

 743

 909

 1,129

 1,294

 1,572

 1,366

 1,608

 2,166

 2,298

 183

 183

 183

 181

 182

 179

 177

 177

 176

 173

 172

 172

 172

 172

 173

 176

 177

 179

 184

 186

 182

 179

 178

 180

 181

 181

 182

 183

 182

 183

 186

 219

 235

 256

 269

 262

 223

 208

 213

 210

 211

 197

 195

 195

 209

 252

 302

 390

 601

 584

 413

 298

 252

 284

 333

 329

 363

 467

 383

 433

 557

 594

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

OCTOBER 2008 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: November 4, 2008

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

RIO VISTA ON THE SACRAMENTO RIVER
§ 404.331 Who is entitled to wife's or husband's benefits as a divorced spouse. You are entitled to wife's or husband's benefits as the divorced wife or divorced husband of an insured person who is entitled to old-age or disability benefits if you meet the requirements of paragraphs (a) through (e). You are entitled to these benefits even though the insured person is not yet entitled to benefits, if the insured person is at least age 62 and if you meet the requirements of paragraphs (a) through (f). The requirements are that— ( a ) You are the insured's divorced wife or divorced husband and— ( 1 ) You were validly married to the insured under State law as described in § 404.345 or you were deemed to be validly married as described in § 404.346; and
( 2 ) You were married to the insured for at least 10 years immediately before your divorce became final;
( b ) You apply;
( c ) You are not married. (For purposes of meeting this requirement, you will be considered not to be married throughout the month in which the divorce occurred);
( d ) You are age 62 or older throughout a month in which all other conditions of entitlement are met; and
( e ) You are not entitled to an old-age or disability benefit based upon a primary insurance amount that is equal to or larger than the full wife's or husband's benefit.
( f ) You have been divorced from the insured person for at least 2 years.
[44 FR 34481, June 15, 1979, as amended at 48 FR 21926, May 16, 1983; 51 FR 11911, Apr. 8, 1986; 58 FR 64891, Dec. 10, 1993]
```

[Congressional Bills 114th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 3887 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

114th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 3887

 To amend title 49, United States Code, to increase certain penalties 
  relating to commercial motor vehicle safety, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            November 3, 2015

  Mr. Chabot introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
             Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To amend title 49, United States Code, to increase certain penalties 
  relating to commercial motor vehicle safety, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Driver Accountability and Accident 
Prevention (DAAP) Act of 2015''.

SEC. 2. PENALTIES.

    (a) Civil Penalty.--Section 521(b)(2)(A) of title 49, United States 
Code, is amended by striking ``$2,500'' and inserting ``$5,000''.
    (b) Criminal Penalty.--Section 521(b)(6)(A) of title 49, United 
States Code, is amended by striking ``$2,500'' and inserting 
``$5,000''.
    (c) Disqualifications.--
            (1) First violation or committing felony.--Section 
        31310(b)(1) of title 49, United States Code, is amended--
                    (A) in subparagraph (D), by striking ``; or'' and 
                inserting a semicolon;
                    (B) in subparagraph (E), by striking the period at 
                the end and inserting ``; or''; and
                    (C) by adding at the end the following new 
                subparagraph:
            ``(F) determined by the Secretary to have operated a 
        commercial motor vehicle that the individual knew or reasonably 
        should have known had a defect that resulted in a fatality.''.
            (2) Second and multiple violations.--Section 31310(c)(1) of 
        title 49, United States Code, is amended--
                    (A) in subparagraph (E), by striking ``; or'' and 
                inserting a semicolon;
                    (B) by redesignating subparagraph (F) as 
                subparagraph (G);
                    (C) in subparagraph (G) (as so redesignated)--
                            (i) by striking ``(E)'' and inserting 
                        ``(F)''; and
                            (ii) by inserting ``, operations,'' after 
                        ``violations''; and
                    (D) by inserting after subparagraph (E) the 
                following new subparagraph:
            ``(F) determined by the Secretary to have more than once 
        operated a commercial motor vehicle that the individual knew or 
        reasonably should have known had a defect that resulted in a 
        fatality; or''.
                                 <all>
```
NO. 07-07-0403-CR

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE SEVENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

AT AMARILLO

PANEL A

JANUARY 14, 2009

______________________________

JAMES MILTON ROBERTS, APPELLANT

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, APPELLEE

_________________________________

FROM THE 410TH DISTRICT COURT OF MONTGOMERY COUNTY;

NO. 07-07-07649-CR; HONORABLE K. MICHAEL MAYES, JUDGE

_______________________________

Before QUINN, C.J., and HANCOCK and PIRTLE, JJ.

ABATEMENT AND REMAND

Following a plea of not guilty, Appellant, James Milton Roberts, was convicted by a jury

of two separate counts of aggravated sexual assault. After pleading true to the enhancement

paragraphs, Appellant was sentenced as a habitual sex offender and punishment was

assessed by the trial court at confinement for life. Notwithstanding that the appellate record

and briefs have been filed, it has come to this Court’s attention that both Trial Court’s

Certifications of Defendant’s Right of Appeal signed on September 4, 2007, contained in the
The proper form for Certification of Defendant’s Right of Appeal appears in Appendix 1

D to the 2008 Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure.

2

clerk’s record do not comply with Rule 25.2(d) of the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure. Rule

25.2(d) was amended effective September 1, 2007, to require that a defendant sign the

certification and receive a copy. Additionally, the amended form provides certain

admonishments to a defendant not previously required.1

Although sentence was imposed on August 8, 2007, the certification forms were not

signed until September 4, 2007, and procedural rules generally control litigation from their

effective date. Wilson v. State, 473 S.W.2d 532, 535 (Tex.Crim.App. 1971). Consequently, we

abate this appeal and remand this cause to the trial court for further proceedings. Upon remand,

the trial court shall utilize whatever means necessary to secure a proper Certification of

Defendant’s Right of Appeal in compliance with Rule 25.2(d) for each separate count. Once

properly completed and executed, the certifications shall be included in a supplemental clerk’s

record. See Tex. R. App. P. 34.5(c)(2). The trial court shall cause the supplemental clerk's

record to be filed with the Clerk of this Court by March 16, 2009. This order constitutes notice to

all parties, pursuant to Rule 37.1 of the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure, of the defective

certifications. If a supplemental clerk’s record containing proper certifications is not filed in

accordance with this order, this matter will be referred to the Court for dismissal. See Tex. R.

App. P. 25.2(d). 

It is so ordered.

Per Curiam

Do not publish.
| 1. | This                Periodic Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a)                or                15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d));                and |
|----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| 2. | The                information contained in the Periodic Report fairly presents, in                all                material respects, the financial condition and results of operations                of                the Company. |
|----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|                                   |                                     |                            |
|----------------------------------------|------------------------------------------|---------------------------------|
| Date:                November 14, 2006 | By:                            | /s/              Steven M. Bell |
|                                   | *Chief                Financial Officer* |

----
#### § 408.1022 How will we notify you of our reconsidered determination?

We will mail a written notice of the reconsidered determination to you at your last known address. We will state the specific reasons for the determination and tell you about your right to a hearing. If it is appropriate, we will also tell you how to use the expedited appeals process.