alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
### §1643d. Claims based on ownership interest in or debt or other obligations owing by corporations or other legal entities

#### (a) Nationals of the United States; charge on property

A claim under section 1643b(a) of this title based upon an ownership interest in any corporation, association, or other entity which is a national of the United States shall not be considered. A claim under section 1643b(a) of this title based upon a debt or other obligation owing by any corporation, association, or other entity organized under the laws of the United States, or of any State, the District of Columbia, or the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico shall be considered, only when such debt or other obligation is a charge on property which has been nationalized, expropriated, intervened, or taken by the Government of Cuba, or the Chinese Communist regime.

#### (b) Direct ownership

A claim under section 1643b(a) of this title based upon a direct ownership interest in a corporation, association, or other entity for loss shall be considered, subject to the other provisions of this subchapter, if such corporation, association, or other entity on the date of the loss was not a national of the United States, without regard to the per centum of ownership vested in the claimant.

#### (c) Indirect ownership

A claim under section 1643b(a) of this title based upon an indirect ownership interest in a corporation, association, or other entity for loss shall be considered, subject to the other provisions of this subchapter, only if at least 25 per centum of the entire ownership interest thereof at the time of such loss was vested in nationals of the United States.

#### (d) Computation of award

The amount of any claim covered by subsection (b) or (c) of this section shall be calculated on the basis of the total loss suffered by such corporation, association, or other entity, and shall bear the same proportion to such loss as the ownership interest of the claimant at the time of loss bears to the entire ownership interest thereof.

(Mar. 10, 1950, ch. 54, title V, §505, as added Pub. L. 88–666, Oct. 16, 1964, 78 Stat. 1111; amended Pub. L. 89–262, §3, Oct. 19, 1965, 79 Stat. 988; Pub. L. 89–780, §4, Nov. 6, 1966, 80 Stat. 1365.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

1966—Subsec. (a). Pub. L. 89–780 provided for applicability of subsection to property nationalized or taken by the Chinese Communist regime.

1965—Subsec. (a). Pub. L. 89–262 authorized consideration of claims based on debt or other obligation owing by corporations or other legal entities which is a charge on property nationalized, expropriated, intervened, or taken by Government of Cuba.
### IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 16

- 50480 Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA , Plaintiff

- Appellee

v.
GILBERTO BROCHE RUIZ , Defendant

- Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas USDC No. 1:15

- CR

- 312

- 1

Before KING, DENNIS, and COSTA, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: *
Gilberto Broche Ruiz was convicted following a jury trial of conspiracy to possess and possessi ng with intent to distribute 500 grams or more of methamphetamine. He was sentenced to concurrent terms of 210 months of imprisonment. He appeals his conviction, arguing that he was a denied a f air
trial because the Government e licited testimony that he had invoked his Fourth Amendment right to refuse a warrantless search of his cell phone.

* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5 , the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit 

### FILED March 29, 2017 Lyle W. Cayce Clerk Case: 16-50480 Document: 00513931644 Page: 1 Date Filed: 03/29/2017No. 16

- 50480

2 Because Ruiz failed to object to the complained

- of testimony, review is for plain error only. See Puckett v. United States , 556 U.S. 129, 135 (2009)

. To establish plain error, he must show a forfeited error that is clear or obvious and that affects his substantial rights. See id. In order to show that an error affected his substantial rights, Ruiz must dem onstrate that the error affected the outcome of the proceedings. See id. If he makes such a showing, this court has the discretion to correct the error but will do so only if it seriously affects the fairness, integrity, or public reputation of judicial proceedings. Id. Ruiz’s argument is unavailing. Any error is not clear or obviou s as our court has only assumed, without deciding, that such testimony may be improper. See United States v. Salinas , 480 F.3d 750, 759 (5th Cir. 2007). In any event, Ruiz fails to show that any error affected the outcome of the proceedings. See United States v. Runyan , 290 F.3d 223, 249

- 50 (5th Cir. 2002). The record reflects that the prosecutor did not focus on or highlight Ruiz’s refusal to consent to a warrantless search, and the evidence of Ruiz’s guilt was substantial

. S ee id. at 250

- 51. Thus, Ruiz fails to show that the

error , if any, affects his substantial rights. S ee Puckett , 556 U.S. at 135.
AFFIRMED. Case: 16-50480 Document: 00513931644 Page: 2 Date Filed: 03/29/2017
#### The People, of the State of New York ex rel. Josiah J. White, Relator, v. Hon. Norman S. Dike, a Judge of the County Court of the County of Kings, Respondent.

Motion denied, without prejudice to renewal. The petition presented to the county judge, with the original precept submitted, should be made part of the moving papers for such application. Present — Jenks, P. J., Burr, Carr, Stapleton and Putnam, JJ.
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Florence Bond, Appellant.

Judgment of the County Court, Queens County, convicting defendant of the crimes of abortion and conspiracy, reversed on the law and the facts, the indictment dismissed and defendant discharged. *(People*V. *Blum, ante,*p. 917, decided herewith.) Lewis, P. J., Carswell, Johnston, Adel and Wenzel, JJ., concur.
# C_2012398DE.01003701.xml

| 22.12.2012 | DE | Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union | C 398/37 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

22.12.2012

DE

Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union

C 398/37

---

Berichtigung der Bekanntmachung des Außerkrafttretens bestimmter Antidumpingmaßnahmen

(
  Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union C 336 vom 6. November 2012
  )

Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union C 336 vom 6. November 2012

2012/C 398/09

Seite 19:

anstatt:

„Diese Bekanntmachung wird nach Artikel 11 Absatz 2 der Verordnung (EG) Nr. 1225/2009 des Rates vom 30. November 2009 über den Schutz gegen gedumpte Einfuhren aus nicht zur Europäischen Gemeinschaft gehörenden Ländern (1) veröffentlicht.

| Ware | Ursprungs- oder Ausfuhrländer | Maßnahmen | Rechtsgrundlage | Tag des Außerkrafttretens (2) |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Folien aus Polyethylenterephthalat (PET) | Brasilien, Indien und Israel | Antidumpingzoll | Verordnung (EG) Nr. 1292/2007 des Rates (ABl. L 288 vom 6.11.2007, S. 1) | 7.11.2012 |

Ware

Ursprungs- oder Ausfuhrländer

Maßnahmen

Rechtsgrundlage

Tag des Außerkrafttretens (2)

Folien aus Polyethylenterephthalat (PET)

Brasilien, Indien und Israel

Antidumpingzoll

Verordnung (EG) Nr. 1292/2007 des Rates (ABl. L 288 vom 6.11.2007, S. 1)

7.11.2012

muss es heißen:

„Nach der Veröffentlichung der Bekanntmachung des bevorstehenden Außerkrafttretens der nachstehend genannten Antidumpingmaßnahme (3) ging kein ordnungsgemäß begründeter Antrag auf Überprüfung ein; daher gibt die Kommission bekannt, dass diese Maßnahme in Kürze außer Kraft tritt.

Diese Bekanntmachung wird nach Artikel 11 Absatz 2 der Verordnung (EG) Nr. 1225/2009 des Rates vom 30. November 2009 über den Schutz gegen gedumpte Einfuhren aus nicht zur Europäischen Gemeinschaft gehörenden Ländern (4) veröffentlicht.

| Ware | Ursprungs- oder Ausfuhrländer | Maßnahmen | Rechtsgrundlage | Tag des Außerkrafttretens (5) |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Folien aus Polyethylenterephthalat (PET) | Brasilien, Indien und Israel | Antidumpingzoll | Verordnung (EG) Nr. 1292/2007 des Rates (ABl. L 288 vom 6.11.2007, S. 1) | 7.11.2012 |

Ware

Ursprungs- oder Ausfuhrländer

Maßnahmen

Rechtsgrundlage

Tag des Außerkrafttretens (5)

Folien aus Polyethylenterephthalat (PET)

Brasilien, Indien und Israel

Antidumpingzoll

Verordnung (EG) Nr. 1292/2007 des Rates (ABl. L 288 vom 6.11.2007, S. 1)

7.11.2012

---

(1)  ABl. L 343 vom 22.12.2009, S. 51.“

1

(2)  Die Maßnahme tritt an dem in dieser Spalte angeführten Tag um Mitternacht außer Kraft.

2

(3)  ABl. C 117 vom 21.4.2012, S. 7.

3

(4)  ABl. L 343 vom 22.12.2009, S. 51.“

4

(5)  Die Maßnahme tritt an dem in dieser Spalte angeführten Tag um Mitternacht außer Kraft.

5

---
#### § 226.70 General.

For any month an employee disability annuitant is entitled to workers' compensation or a public disability benefit, the tier I benefit of the spouse or divorced spouse is reduced due to receipt of such benefits. (If both spouse and divorced spouse annuities are payable, the reduction amount is divided and applied in equal amounts to both the spouse and divorced spouse tier I benefits.) The employee tier I is reduced by the difference between the total reduction amount, described in § 226.71 of this part, and the reduction in the spouse and divorced spouse tier I benefits.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

DAY HIGH

 168

 166

 165

 163

 159

 156

 154

 152

 155

 169

 173

 175

 173

 173

 172

 171

 172

 174

 173

 183

 205

 194

 210

 211

 218

 199

 170

 163

 160

 167

 157

 158

 153

 147

 141

 142

 141

 141

 138

 141

 152

 164

 164

 168

 167

 162

 164

 163

 164

 166

 166

 165

 166

 162

 158

 154

 148

 146

 146

 138

 164

 162

 159

 155

 148

 145

 144

 144

 144

 153

 164

 169

 170

 170

 170

 168

 167

 167

 167

 169

 173

 172

 173

 174

 174

 166

 157

 152

 152

 148

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

JUNE 2009 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: July 29, 2009

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

RIO VISTA ON THE SACRAMENTO RIVER
I 

114TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 4030 

To amend the Immigration and Nationality Act to provide that refugees 

may not be resettled in any State where the governor of that State 

has taken any action formally disapproving of the resettlement of refugees in that State, and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

NOVEMBER 17, 2015 

Mr. PALAZZO introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on the Judiciary 

A BILL 

To amend the Immigration and Nationality Act to provide 

that refugees may not be resettled in any State where 

the governor of that State has taken any action formally 

disapproving of the resettlement of refugees in that 

State, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. LIMITATION ON RESETTLEMENT OF REFU4 GEES. 

5 Section 412 of the Immigration and Nationality Act 

6 (8 U.S.C. 1522) is amended by adding at the end the fol7 lowing: 


SSpencer on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 4030 IH

1 ‘‘(g) LIMITATION ON RESETTLEMENT.— 

2 ‘‘(1) IN GENERAL.—Notwithstanding any other 

3 provision of this section, the Director or the Federal 

4 agency administering subsection (b)(1) may not pro5 vide for the resettlement of any refugee in a fiscal 

6 year in any State where the Governor of that State 

7 has taken any action formally disapproving of the 

8 resettlement of refugees, or of certain refugees, in 

9 that State during that fiscal year. 

10 ‘‘(2) RECEIPT OF FUNDS.—A State where the 

11 Governor of the State has taken action described in 

12 paragraph (1)— 

13 ‘‘(A) in the case of such an action which 

14 disapproves of the resettlement of any refugee 

15 in that State, may not receive any funds under 

16 this section during that fiscal year; or 

17 ‘‘(B) in the case of such an action which 

18 disapproves of the resettlement of only certain 

19 refugees in that State, shall receive a reduction 

20 in any funds which the State would otherwise 

21 receive under this section, as determined to be 

22 proportionate to the number of refugees not re23 settled pursuant to such action by the Director 


SSpencer on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
3 

•HR 4030 IH

1 or the Federal agency administering subsection 

2 (b)(1), as appropriate.’’. 

Æ 


SSpencer on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
EXHIBIT 12
                              BellSouth Corporation
                    Computation Of Earnings To Fixed Charges
                              (Dollars In Millions)






                                               For the Nine Months
                                               Ended September 30,
                                                       1999
1. Earnings

   (a) Income from continuing operations
       before deductions for taxes and interest   $   4,603

   (b) Portion of rental expense representative
       of interest factor                                72

   (c) Equity in losses from less-than-50%-owned
       investments (accounted for under the
       equity method of accounting)                     420

   (d) Excess of earnings over distributions of
       less-than-50%-owned investments
       (accounted for under the equity method
       of accounting)                                   (56)

   TOTAL                                          $   5,039

2. Fixed Charges

   (a) Interest                                   $     761

   (b) Portion of rental expense representative
       of interest factor                                72

         TOTAL                                    $     833

   Ratio (1 divided by 2)                              6.05
# C_2016093EN.01036401.xml

| 9.3.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 93/364 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

9.3.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 93/364

---

P7_TA(2013)0349

Appointment of Luigi Berlinguer to the panel set up under Article 255 of the TFEU

European Parliament decision of 10 September 2013 proposing the appointment of Luigi Berlinguer to the panel set up under Article 255 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (2013/2161(INS))

(2016/C 093/38)

The European Parliament,

The European Parliament

| — | having regard to the second paragraph of Article 255 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (TFEU), |
| --- | --- |

—

having regard to the second paragraph of Article 255 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (TFEU),

| — | having regard to Rule 107a of its Rules of Procedure, |
| --- | --- |

—

having regard to Rule 107a of its Rules of Procedure,

| A. | whereas Luigi Berlinguer meets the conditions laid down in the second paragraph of Article 255 TFEU; |
| --- | --- |

A.

whereas Luigi Berlinguer meets the conditions laid down in the second paragraph of Article 255 TFEU;

| 1. | Proposes that Luigi Berlinguer be appointed to the panel; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Proposes that Luigi Berlinguer be appointed to the panel;

| 2. | Instructs its President to forward this decision to the President of the Court of Justice. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Instructs its President to forward this decision to the President of the Court of Justice.

---
[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 78 (Friday, April 22, 2011)]
[Notices]
[Page 22695]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2011-9810]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket No. ER11-3367-000]


Yuba City Cogenerations Partners, LP; Supplemental Notice That 
Initial Market-Based Rate Filing Includes Request for Blanket Section 
204 Authorization

    This is a supplemental notice in the above-referenced proceeding of 
Yuba City Cogeneration Partners, LP's application for market-based rate 
authority, with an accompanying rate tariff, noting that such 
application includes a request for blanket authorization, under 18 CFR 
part 34, of future issuances of securities and assumptions of 
liability.
    Any person desiring to intervene or to protest should file with the 
Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE., 
Washington, DC 20426, in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the 
Commission's Rules of Practice and Procedure (18 CFR 385.211 and 
385.214). Anyone filing a motion to intervene or protest must serve a 
copy of that document on the Applicant.
    Notice is hereby given that the deadline for filing protests with 
regard to the applicant's request for blanket authorization, under 18 
CFR part 34, of future issuances of securities and assumptions of 
liability, is May 9, 2011.
    The Commission encourages electronic submission of protests and 
interventions in lieu of paper, using the FERC Online links at http://www.ferc.gov. To facilitate electronic service, persons with Internet 
access who will eFile a document and/or be listed as a contact for an 
intervenor must create and validate an eRegistration account using the 
eRegistration link. Select the eFiling link to log on and submit the 
intervention or protests.
    Persons unable to file electronically should submit an original and 
14 copies of the intervention or protest to the Federal Energy 
Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE., Washington, DC 20426.
    The filings in the above-referenced proceeding are accessible in 
the Commission's eLibrary system by clicking on the appropriate link in 
the above list. They are also available for review in the Commission's 
Public Reference Room in Washington, DC. There is an eSubscription link 
on the Web site that enables subscribers to receive e-mail notification 
when a document is added to a subscribed docket(s). For assistance with 
any FERC Online service, please e-mail <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#71373423323e1f1d181f14220401011e030531171403125f161e07"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="d2949780919dbcbebbbcb781a7a2a2bda0a692b4b7a0b1fcb5bda4">[email protected]</span></a> or 
call (866) 208-3676 (toll free). For TTY, call (202) 502-8659.

    Dated: April 18, 2011.
Nathaniel J. Davis, Sr.,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2011-9810 Filed 4-21-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
§ 404.1615 Making disability determinations. ( a ) When making a disability determination, the State agency will apply subpart P, part 404, of our regulations.
( b ) The State agency will make disability determinations based only on the medical and nonmedical evidence in its files.
( c ) Disability determinations will be made by: ( 1 ) A State agency medical or psychological consultant and a State agency disability examiner;
( 2 ) A State agency disability examiner alone when there is no medical evidence to be evaluated (*i.e.*, no medical evidence exists or we are unable, despite making every reasonable effort, to obtain any medical evidence that may exist) and the individual fails or refuses, without a good reason, to attend a consultative examination (see § 404.1518);
( 3 ) A State agency disability examiner alone if the claim is adjudicated under the quick disability determination process (see § 404.1619) or the compassionate allowance process (see § 404.1602), and the initial or reconsidered determination is fully favorable to you. This paragraph (c)(3) will no longer be effective on December 28, 2018 unless we terminate it earlier by publication of a final rule in the Federal Register; or
( 4 ) A State agency disability hearing officer. See § 404.1616 for the definition of medical or psychological consultant and § 404.915 for the definition of disability hearing officer. The State agency disability examiner and disability hearing officer must be qualified to interpret and evaluate medical reports and other evidence relating to the claimant's physical or mental impairments and as necessary to determine the capacities of the claimant to perform substantial gainful activity. See § 404.1572 for what we mean by substantial gainful activity.
( d ) The State agency will certify each determination of disability to us on forms we provide.
( e ) The State agency will furnish us with all the evidence it considered in making its determination.
( f ) The State agency will not be responsible for defending in court any determination made, or any procedure for making determinations, under these regulations.
[52 FR 33926, Sept. 9, 1987, as amended at 56 FR 11018, Mar. 14, 1991; 61 FR 11135, Mar. 19, 1996; 62 FR 38452, July 18, 1997; 65 FR 34958, June 1, 2000; 75 FR 62682, Oct. 13, 2010; 78 FR 66639, Nov. 6, 2013; 79 FR 51243, Aug. 28, 2014; 80 FR 63093, Oct. 19, 2015; 81 FR 73028, Oct. 24, 2016; 82 FR 5872, Jan. 18, 2017]
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

DAY ELEV

 1,052.00

 1,052.61

 1,053.16

 1,053.86

 1,054.34

 1,054.90

 1,055.43

 1,055.89

 1,056.21

 1,056.56

 1,057.03

 1,057.74

 1,058.85

 1,059.75

 1,060.58

 1,061.31

 1,061.93

 1,062.40

 1,062.79

 1,063.18

 1,063.65

 1,064.01

 1,064.09

 1,064.26

 1,064.58

 1,064.67

 1,064.67

 1,065.94

 1,066.36

 1,066.48

 4,118.8

 4,135.9

 4,151.3

 4,171.0

 4,184.6

 4,200.4

 4,215.5

 4,228.6

 4,237.7

 4,247.7

 4,261.1

 4,281.5

 4,313.4

 4,339.5

 4,363.5

 4,384.7

 4,402.7

 4,416.4

 4,427.8

 4,439.2

 4,453.0

 4,463.6

 4,465.9

 4,470.9

 4,480.4

 4,483.0

 4,483.0

 4,520.6

 4,533.1

 4,536.6

STORAGE

+15.1

+17.1

+15.4

+19.7

+13.6

+15.8

+15.1

+13.1

+9.1

+10.0

+13.4

+20.4

+32.0

+26.0

+24.0

+21.2

+18.0

+13.7

+11.4

+11.4

+13.8

+10.6

+2.4

+5.0

+9.4

+2.7

+0.0

+37.6

+12.5

+3.6

CHANGE

 9,569

 10,055

 9,340

 12,001

 8,661

 9,813

 9,217

 8,216

 7,405

 8,205

 9,884

 13,492

 19,113

 15,567

 14,436

 13,972

 12,303

 10,696

 10,764

 10,093

 11,047

 11,542

 9,554

 14,860

 17,473

 13,644

 13,374

 32,491

 32,898

 29,565

INFLOW

 1,801

 1,435

 1,525

 2,063

 1,766

 1,692

 1,603

 1,514

 2,696

 3,023

 2,990

 3,127

 2,999

 2,437

 2,281

 3,283

 3,148

 3,642

 4,875

 4,184

 4,035

 6,139

 8,271

 12,045

 12,666

 12,046

 13,348

 11,957

 13,014

 13,573

POWER

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

SPILL

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 289

 0

 0

 0

 1,364

 13,206

 14,192

OUTLET

 173

 0

 33

 0

 58

 133

 25

 109

 109

 143

 126

 93

 0

 0

 43

 17

 69

 138

 147

 155

 61

 78

 95

 0

 52

 261

 26

 236

 385

 0

C.F.S.

 .21

 .00

 .04

 .00

 .07

 .16

 .03

 .13

 .13

 .17

 .15

 .11

 .00

 .00

 .05

 .02

 .08

 .16

 .17

 .18

 .07

 .09

 .11

 .00

 .06

 .30

 .03

 .27

 .44

 .00

INCHES

 .00

 .13

 .10

 .63

 .03

 .01

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .23

 1.38

 1.39

 .00

 .13

 .31

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .57

 .24

 .00

 .90

 .38

 .72

 .01

 .93

 1.04

 2.85

PRECIP

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

APRIL 2003 SHASTA LAKE DAILY OPERATIONS RUN DATE: March 12, 2004

IN LAKE

EVAPORATION

INCHES

C.F.S.

COMPUTED*

1000 ACRE-FEET

RELEASE - C.F.S.

RIVER

TOTALS +433.1 409,250 159,178 0 29,051 2,765 3.23 11.98

ACRE-FEET +433,100 811,747 315,730 0 57,623 5,484

COMMENTS:

* COMPUTED INFLOW IS THE SUM OF CHANGE IN STORAGE, RELEASES AND EVAPORATION.

SUMMARY

RELEASE (ACRE-FEET)

POWER 315,730

SPILL 0

OUTLET

TOTAL

 57,623

 373,353

PRECIPITATION

THIS MONTH =

TO DATE =

 11.98

JULY 1, 2002 72.18

 4,103.7