alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

DAY ELEVATION

 241.09

 240.42

 241.18

 241.33

 241.32

 241.29

 241.28

 241.27

 240.64

 240.31

 240.18

 240.10

 240.09

 240.13

 252.50

 252.47

 252.55

 252.47

 252.45

 252.50

 252.45

 252.54

 252.48

 250.40

 252.52

 252.49

 252.44

 252.47

 252.54

 252.41

 622

 528

 636

 659

 658

 653

 651

 650

 558

 513

 495

 484

 482

 488

 3,924

 3,909

 3,948

 3,909

 3,899

 3,924

 3,899

 3,943

 3,914

 2,982

 3,933

 3,919

 3,894

 3,909

 3,943

 3,879

STORAGE

-17

-94

+108

+23

-1

-5

-2

-1

-92

-45

-18

-11

-2

+6

+3,436

-15

+39

-39

-10

+25

-25

+44

-29

-932

+951

-14

-25

+15

+34

-64

CHANGE

 332

 272

 379

 460

 512

 428

 319

 333

 441

 322

 393

 382

 191

 263

 212

 812

 931

 1,217

 1,369

 1,293

 1,051

 723

 406

 458

 944

 999

 1,100

 1,106

 1,110

 914

 16,900

 17,100

 17,600

 17,900

 18,100

 17,800

 17,700

 17,700

 15,000

 13,700

 13,300

 13,000

 12,400

 12,300

 13,400

 12,300

 12,172

 11,714

 11,129

 12,300

 11,572

 11,800

 11,927

 10,552

 11,240

 10,953

 12,200

 12,172

 12,553

 12,819

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

JUNE 2010 RED BLUFF DIVERSION RESERVOIR DAILY OPERATIONS RUN DATE: July 1, 2010

IN LAKE

CANAL

 ACRE-FEET

TOTALS +3,240 19,672 411,303

ACRE-FEET +3,240 39,019 815,820

SUMMARY

RELEASE (ACRE-FEET)

TOTAL 857,957

 639

RELEASE

RIVER

CORNING TO SACTO

CANAL

RELEASE C.F.S

TEHAMA

COLUSA

 29

 9

 26

 24

 36

 52

 39

 42

 62

 91

 52

 42

 52

 56

 64

 89

 68

 67

 37

 49

 44

 40

 58

 64

 77

 72

 58

 43

 57

 73

 1,572

 3,118

CORNING CANAL 3,118

TEHAMA-COLUSA CANAL 39,019

TO SACTO RIVER 815,820
### §§2241 to 2243. Repealed. Pub. L. 92–226, pt. II, §202(b), Feb. 7, 1972, 86 Stat. 27

Section 2241, Pub. L. 87–195, pt. I, §401, Sept. 4, 1961, 75 Stat. 434; Pub. L. 89–583, pt. I, §108(a), Sept. 19, 1966, 80 Stat. 801; Pub. L. 90–137, pt. I, §111(a), Nov. 14, 1967, 81 Stat. 454, provided for general authority and limitation on countries to receive assistance.

Section 2242, Pub. L. 87–195, pt. I, §402, Sept. 4, 1961, 75 Stat. 434; Pub. L. 87–565, pt. I, §108, Aug. 1, 1962, 76 Stat. 259; Pub. L. 88–205, pt. I, §109, Dec. 16, 1963, 77 Stat. 383; Pub. L. 88–633, pt. I, §107, Oct. 7, 1964, 78 Stat. 1010; Pub. L. 89–171, pt. I, §107, Sept. 6, 1965, 79 Stat. 656; Pub. L. 89–371, §1, Mar. 18, 1966, 80 Stat. 74; Pub. L. 89–583, pt. I, §108(b), Sept. 19, 1966, 80 Stat. 801; Pub. L. 90–137, pt. I, §111(b), Nov. 14, 1967, 81 Stat. 454; Pub. L. 90–554, pt. I, §109, Oct. 8, 1968, 82 Stat. 962; Pub. L. 91–175, pt. I, §109, Dec. 30, 1969, 83 Stat. 819; Pub. L. 91–652, §5, Jan. 5, 1971; 84 Stat. 1942, provided for authorization of appropriations, executive approval of budgeting of proceeds by Vietnam for economic assistance projects or programs, and executive approval of accommodation rate of exchange between United States and Vietnam.

Section 2243, Pub. L. 87–195, pt. I, §403, as added Pub. L. 90–137, pt. I, §111(c), Nov. 14, 1967, 81 Stat. 454, provided for United States refund claims.

For subject matters of sections 2241 to 2243 of this title, see sections 2346, 2346a, and 2346b of this title, respectively.
(No. 74-CC-40

#### Desaulniers and Company, Claimant, *vs.*State of Illinois, Public Employees Pension Laws Commission, Respondent.

*Opinion filed February 20, 1974.*

Desaulniers and Company, Claimant, pro se.

William J. Scott, Attorney General; Howard W. Feldman, Assistant Attorney General, for Respondent.

Per Curiam.
PLANT HEAT RATE vs. CO2 /MWh

Subcri:cal/Ultra‐Supercri:cal Coal; NG Combined Cycle 

1 
ECONOMIC ASSESSMENT OF CARBON CAPTURE 

AND STORAGE TECHNOLOGIES: 2011 UPDATE 

(By Worley‐Parsons, Schlumberger for the Global CCS Ins:tute 

Range in “First‐of‐A‐Kind” 

and “Nth‐of‐A‐Kind” 

Depends on Coal 

Composi:on, Plant 

Features, etc 

2 
MOST OBSERVERS CITE 2020 

AS COMMERCIAL DATE FOR CCS 

• G8 Policy Statement: 

“....strongly support the launching of 20 large‐scale CCS demonstra:on projects 

globally by 2010, taking into account various na:onal circumstances, with a view to 

beginning broad deployment of CCS by 2020” (G8 Summit 2008) 

• IEA RD&D Needs: “Warran%es offered on proven technologies by 2017”   (IEA 

CCS Technology Roadmap; page 28) 

• DOE CCS 

Roadmap: 

Demonstra:ons 

Thru 2020 

3
(No. 73-CC-267

#### J. Wm. Brennan, Inc., Claimant, *vs.*State of Illinois, Department of Law Enforcement, Respondent.

*Opinion filed May 25, 1973.*

J. William Brennan, Inc., Claimant, pro se.

William J. Scott, Attorney General; William E. Webber, Assistant Attorney General, for Respondent.

Per Curiam.
### §7513. Purposes

The purposes of this part are to—

(1) authorize and develop innovative educational programs to assist Native Hawaiians;

(2) provide direction and guidance to appropriate Federal, State, and local agencies to focus resources, including resources made available under this part, on Native Hawaiian education, and to provide periodic assessment and data collection;

(3) supplement and expand programs and authorities in the area of education to further the purposes of this subchapter; and

(4) encourage the maximum participation of Native Hawaiians in planning and management of Native Hawaiian education programs.

(Pub. L. 89–10, title VI, §6203, formerly title VII, §7203, as added Pub. L. 107–110, title VII, §701, Jan. 8, 2002, 115 Stat. 1937; renumbered title VI, §6203, Pub. L. 114–95, title VI, §6001(a), (b)(1), Dec. 10, 2015, 129 Stat. 2046.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Prior Provisions

A prior section 7513, Pub. L. 89–10, title VII, §7203, as added Pub. L. 103–382, title I, §101, Oct. 20, 1994, 108 Stat. 3737, authorized foreign language assistance program, prior to the general amendment of former subchapter VII of this chapter by Pub. L. 107–110.
§ 228.20 Reduction for an employee annuity. ( a ) *General.* If an individual is entitled to an annuity as a survivor, and is also entitled to an employee annuity, then the survivor annuity must be reduced by the amount of the employee annuity. However, this reduction does not apply (except as provided in paragraph (b) of this section) if the survivor or the individual upon whose earnings record the survivor annuity is based worked for a railroad employer or as an employee representative before January 1, 1975.
( b ) *Tier I reduction.* If an individual is entitled to an annuity as a survivor, then the tier I component of the survivor annuity must be reduced by the amount of the tier I component of the employee annuity after reduction for age. Where the survivor is entitled to a tier II component and either the survivor or the employee had railroad earnings before 1975, a portion of this reduction may be restored in the computation of the tier II component (see § 228.52 of this part).
The State of TexasAppellee/s

Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

June 10, 2014

No. 04-14-00188-CR

Mike DAVIS,

Appellant

v.

THE STATE OF TEXAS,

Appellee

From the 175th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2011CR0287

Honorable Mary D. Roman, Judge Presiding

ORDER

The reporter’s record in this appeal was due April 27, 2014; however, the court granted 

the reporter, Charles Richardson, an extension of time until May 27 to file the record. The 

record was not filed. Instead, the reporter filed a notification of late record on June 9, requesting 

an additional thirty days to file the record.

We order Charles Richardson to file the record by June 26, 2014 (sixty days after the 

original due date). Richardson is advised that the court will not grant a further extension of time 

unless he (1) establishes there are extraordinary circumstances that prevent him from timely 

filing the record and (2) provides the court reasonable assurance the record will be completed 

and filed by the requested extended deadline. 

_________________________________

Luz Elena D. Chapa, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said 

court on this 10th day of June, 2014.

___________________________________

Keith E. Hottle

Clerk of Court
<PAGE>   1

                                                                    Exhibit 11.1

                              IDENTIX INCORPORATED
                 STATEMENT OF COMPUTATION OF EARNINGS PER SHARE



<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                              THREE MONTHS ENDED             NINE MONTHS ENDED
                                                                   MARCH 31,                     MARCH 31,
                                                         ---------------------------   ----------------------------
                                                           1997            1996             1997          1996
                                                           ----            ----             ----          ----

<S>                                                     <C>            <C>             <C>            <C>          
Net income (loss)                                       $    145,000   $ (4,821,000)   $    347,000   $ (5,151,000)
                                                        ============   ============    ============   ============

Number of shares used in computing per share amounts:

    Weighted average common outstanding                   24,377,000     23,513,000      24,343,000     23,227,000

    Common equivalent shares attributable to
        stock options and warrants                           837,000              *         780,000              *
                                                        ------------   ------------    ------------   ------------

    Total weighted average common and
        common equivalent shares outstanding              25,214,000     23,513,000      25,123,000     23,227,000
                                                        ============   ============    ============   ============

Net income (loss) per share                             $       0.01   $      (0.21)   $       0.01   $      (0.22)
                                                        ============   ============    ============   ============
</TABLE>



* Common equivalent shares had an anti-dilutive effect.


                                       21
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

October 29, 2018

No. 04-18-00411-CV

REPSOL OIL AND GAS USA, LLC as successor of Talisman Energy USA Inc, Statoil Texas 

Onshore Properties, LLC, and Statoil Pipelines, LLC, and OGE, LLC,

Appellants

v.

MATRIX PETROLEUM, LLC, Matrix Petroleum Holdings LLC, JAR Resources Holdings, 

L.P., and TMRX Petroleum, LLC,

Appellees

From the 218th Judicial District Court, La Salle County, Texas

Trial Court No. 14-08-00158-CVL

Honorable Russell Wilson, Judge Presiding

O R D E R

The court reporter’s second request for additional time to file the reporter’s record is 

granted. We order the court reporter, Leticia Escamilla, to file the reporter’s record by November 

26, 2018. Ms. Escamilla is advised that no further extensions of time will be granted absent a 

timely motion that (1) demonstrates extraordinary circumstances justifying further delay, (2) 

advises the court of the efforts expended in preparing the reporter’s record, and (3) provides the 

court reasonable assurance that the reporter’s record will be completed and filed by the requested 

extended deadline. The court does not generally consider a heavy work schedule to be an 

extraordinary circumstance.

_________________________________

Luz Elena D. Chapa, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said 

court on this 29th day of October, 2018.

___________________________________

KEITH E. HOTTLE,

Clerk of Court
# C_2012369EN.01000701.xml

| 29.11.2012 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 369/7 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

29.11.2012

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 369/7

---

Explanatory Notes to the Combined Nomenclature of the European Union

2012/C 369/06

Pursuant to Article 9(1)(a), second indent, of Council Regulation (EEC) No 2658/87 of 23 July 1987 on the tariff and statistical nomenclature and on the Common Customs Tariff (1), the Explanatory Notes to the Combined Nomenclature of the European Union (2) are amended as follows:

1

2

On page 335:

On page 335:

| 8504 40 30 | Of a kind used with telecommunication apparatus, automatic data-processing machines and units thereof


  The second paragraph is replaced by the following:


  ‘Static converters for telecommunication apparatus or for automatic data-processing machines and units thereof serve to convert, for example, the alternating current (AC) drawn from the mains supply into the requisite direct current (DC).’ |
| --- | --- |

8504 40 30

Of a kind used with telecommunication apparatus, automatic data-processing machines and units thereof

Of a kind used with telecommunication apparatus, automatic data-processing machines and units thereof

The second paragraph is replaced by the following:

The second paragraph is replaced by the following:

‘Static converters for telecommunication apparatus or for automatic data-processing machines and units thereof serve to convert, for example, the alternating current (AC) drawn from the mains supply into the requisite direct current (DC).’

---

(1)  OJ L 256, 7.9.1987, p. 1.

1

(2)  OJ C 137, 6.5.2011, p. 1.

2

---
# C_2012370EN.01000101.xml

| 30.11.2012 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 370/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

30.11.2012

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 370/1

---

Authorisation for State aid pursuant to Articles 107 and 108 of the TFEU

Cases where the Commission raises no objections

(Text with EEA relevance)

2012/C 370/01

| Date of adoption of the decision | 14.6.2012 |
| --- | --- |
| Reference number of State Aid | SA.34643 (12/N) |
| Member State | France |
| Region | Martinique, Guadeloupe, Guyane, Réunion, Saint-Martin |
| Title (and/or name of the beneficiary) | Régime d’aides à caractère social au bénéfice de certaines catégories de personnes ayant leur résidence habituelle dans l'une des collectivités suivantes: la Guadeloupe, la Guyane, la Martinique, Mayotte, la Nouvelle-Calédonie, la Polynésie française, La Réunion, Saint-Barthélemy, Saint-Martin, Saint-Pierre-et-Miquelon et Wallis-et-Futuna |
| Legal basis | Code général des collectivités territoriales, délibération du Conseil régional de la Guadeloupe no CR/11-530 du 3 mai 2011 |
| Type of measure | Aid scheme |
| Objective | Social support to individual consumers |
| Form of aid | Direct grant |
| Budget | Annual budget: EUR 0,9 million |
| Intensity | 100 % |
| Duration (period) | 1.4.2012-indefinite |
| Economic sectors | Air transport |
| Name and address of the granting authority | SGAE |
| 68 rue de Bellechasse |
| 75700 Paris |
| FRANCE |

Date of adoption of the decision

14.6.2012

Reference number of State Aid

SA.34643 (12/N)

Member State

France

Region

Martinique, Guadeloupe, Guyane, Réunion, Saint-Martin

Title (and/or name of the beneficiary)

Régime d’aides à caractère social au bénéfice de certaines catégories de personnes ayant leur résidence habituelle dans l'une des collectivités suivantes: la Guadeloupe, la Guyane, la Martinique, Mayotte, la Nouvelle-Calédonie, la Polynésie française, La Réunion, Saint-Barthélemy, Saint-Martin, Saint-Pierre-et-Miquelon et Wallis-et-Futuna

Legal basis

Code général des collectivités territoriales, délibération du Conseil régional de la Guadeloupe no CR/11-530 du 3 mai 2011

o

Type of measure

Aid scheme

Objective

Social support to individual consumers

Form of aid

Direct grant

Budget

Annual budget: EUR 0,9 million

Intensity

100 %

Duration (period)

1.4.2012-indefinite

Economic sectors

Air transport

Name and address of the granting authority

SGAE

68 rue de Bellechasse

75700 Paris

FRANCE

Other information

—

The authentic text(s) of the decision, from which all confidential information has been removed, can be found at:

http://ec.europa.eu/competition/elojade/isef/index.cfm

---
§ 408.1230 Can you waive State recognition payments? ( a ) *Waiver request in writing.* You may waive your right to receive State recognition payments if you make a written request. If you make your request before you become entitled to SVB, you will not be entitled to State recognition payments. If you make your request after you become entitled to SVB, your request will be effective with the month we receive your request, or with an earlier month if you refund to us the amount of any recognition payment(s) we made to you for the earlier period.
( b ) *Cancelling your waiver.* You may cancel your waiver of State recognition payments at any time by making a written request with us. The cancellation will be effective the month in which it is filed. The date your request is received in a Social Security office or the postmarked date, if the written request was mailed, will be the filing date, whichever is earlier.
§ 9.40 Leelanau Peninsula. ( a ) *Name.* The name of the viticultural area described in this section is “Leelanau Peninsula.”
( b ) *Approved maps.* The appropriate maps for determining the boundaries of the Leelanau Peninsula viticultural area are four U.S.G.S. maps. They are entitled: ( 1 ) “Empire Quadrangle, Michigan,” 15 minute series;
( 2 ) “Maple City Quadrangle, Michigan,” 15 minute series;
( 3 ) “Traverse City Quadrangle, Michigan,” 15 minute series; and
( 4 ) “Northport Quadrangle, Michigan,” 15 minute series.
( c ) *Boundaries.* The Leelanau Peninsula viticultural area encompasses all of Leelanau County, Michigan, excluding the offshore islands.
[T.D. ATF-99, 47 FR 13329, Mar. 30, 1982]
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

DAY HIGH

 203

 205

 206

 199

 198

 198

 189

 188

 189

 192

 198

 179

 167

 165

 167

 167

 174

 183

 187

 200

 213

 242

 328

 285

 243

 188

 182

 182

 171

 171

 195

 190

 184

 177

 176

 170

 169

 165

 160

 160

 159

 155

 156

 149

 158

 159

 159

 161

 162

 160

 160

 160

 157

 162

 160

 149

 148

 148

 149

 149

 199

 197

 192

 187

 184

 180

 175

 172

 169

 168

 168

 164

 160

 159

 162

 163

 165

 168

 169

 171

 175

 179

 193

 181

 176

 166

 161

 158

 156

 154

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

JUNE 2001 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: July 18, 2001

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

RIO VISTA ON THE SACRAMENTO RIVER
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Federal Maritime Commission

          - [Docket No. 11-06]

# AGENCY:

Federal Maritime Commission.

# ACTION:

Notice of Order of Investigation and Hearing.

Authority:46 U.S.C. 41302.

# DATES:

The Order of Investigation and Hearing was served April 7, 2011.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

On April 7, 2011 the Federal Maritime Commission instituted an Order of Investigation and Hearing entitled Indigo Logistics, LLC; Liliya Ivanenko; and Leonid Ivanenko—Possible Violations of Section 19 of the Shipping Act of 1984 and the Commission's Regulations at 46 CFR part 515. Acting pursuant to Section 11 of the Shipping Act, 46 U.S.C. 41302, that investigation is instituted to determine:

(1) Whether Indigo Logistics, LLC, Liliya Ivanenko, and Leonid Ivanenko violated Section 19 of the Shipping Act, 46 U.S.C. 40901, 40902, and the Commission's regulations at 46 CFR part 515, by acting as an ocean freight forwarder without a license or evidence of financial responsibility;

(2) Whether, in the event violations of Section 19 of the Shipping Act of 1984 are found, civil penalties should be assessed against Indigo Logistics, LLC, Liliya Ivanenko, and/or Leonid Ivanenko, and, if so, the amount of penalties to be assessed; and

(3) Whether, in the event violations are found, appropriate cease and desist orders should be issued.

                    The Order may be viewed in its entirety at                     *http://www.fmc.gov.*

Karen V. Gregory,

Secretary.

[FR Doc. 2011-9282 Filed 4-15-11; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6730-01-P
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY HIGH

 139

 122

 125

 133

 143

 135

 153

 164

 156

 138

 137

 144

 145

 123

 122

 139

 139

 124

 124

 143

 140

 147

 122

 129

 143

 145

 123

 124

 137

 145

 144

 121

 118

 120

 120

 130

 109

 113

 154

 139

 132

 126

 135

 124

 120

 119

 119

 124

 120

 119

 118

 128

 122

 120

 120

 124

 123

 119

 120

 120

 132

 108

 128

 119

 122

 124

 133

 114

 139

 158

 146

 134

 129

 137

 129

 121

 120

 128

 132

 122

 120

 121

 133

 128

 121

 123

 134

 132

 121

 122

 124

 136

 119

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

JANUARY 2013 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: March 15, 2013

HIGH LOW MEAN

 48.4

 48.2

 48.1

 48.6

 49.9

 50.1

 50.0

 50.0

 49.8

 49.7

 48.6

 47.8

 46.6

 45.6

 46.1

 47.1

 47.7

 48.3

 48.7

 48.9

 49.2

 49.4

 49.9

 52.6

 54.1

 55.6

 53.9

 52.1

 51.9

 52.0

 51.3

 46.9

 46.1

 45.9

 46.1

 46.7

 49.4

 48.5

 48.0

 48.4

 48.2

 46.7

 46.0

 44.5

 43.5

 43.6

 44.3

 44.9

 45.4

 45.8

 46.0

 46.3

 46.5

 48.5

 50.0

 51.8

 53.5

 51.9

 49.9

 49.3

 49.0

 49.4

 47.7

 47.2

 47.1

 47.3

 48.0

 49.7

 49.2

 49.1

 49.2

 48.9

 47.9

 47.0

 45.6

 44.7

 44.9

 45.7

 46.4

 46.9

 47.3

 47.5

 47.9

 48.1

 49.2

 50.9

 53.0

 54.4

 52.9

 51.2

 50.7

 50.6

 50.5

HIGH LOW MEAN

 10.4

 10.5

 10.6

 10.7

 10.7

 10.4

 10.1

 9.6

 9.7

 9.9

 10.4

 10.6

 11.0

 11.3

 11.4

 11.3

 11.2

 11.2

 11.2

 11.2

 11.1

 11.1

 10.8

 10.5

 10.3

 10.1

 10.4

 10.7

 11.0

 11.0

 10.9

 10.1

 10.3

 10.4

 10.4

 10.3

 10.1

 9.1

 9.0

 9.4

 9.6

 9.8

 10.1

 10.5

 10.9

 11.1

 10.9

 10.9

 10.8

 10.8

 10.7

 10.7

 10.7

 10.4

 9.9

 9.9

 9.8

 9.8

 10.1

 10.4

 10.5

 10.5

 10.3

 10.4

 10.5

 10.6

 10.6

 10.3

 9.7

 9.4

 9.6

 9.8

 10.1

 10.4

 10.8

 11.1

 11.2

 11.2

 11.0

 11.0

 10.9

 10.9

 10.9

 10.9

 10.7

 10.3

 10.1

 9.9

 10.0

 10.4

 10.7

 10.7

 10.7

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

RIPON ON THE STANISLAUS RIVER

 ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS WATER TEMPERATURE, DEG DISSOLVED OXYZEN, PPM