alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Editorial Note on Part 416
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 416 appear at 68 FR 53509, Sept. 11, 2003.

§ 416.1801 Introduction. ( a ) *What is in this subpart.* This subpart contains the basic rules for deciding for SSI purposes whether a person is considered married and, if so, to whom; whether a person is considered a child; and whether a person is considered another person's parent. It tells what information and evidence we need to decide these facts.
( b ) *Related subparts.* Subpart D discusses how to determine the amount of a person's benefits; subpart G discusses what changes in a person's situation he or she must report to us; subpart K discusses how we count income; and subpart L discusses how we count resources (money and property). The questions of whether a person is married, to whom a person is married, whether a person is a child, and who is a person's parent must be answered in order to know which rules in subparts D, G, K, and L apply.
( c ) *Definitions.* In this subpart— *Eligible spouse* means a person— ( 1 ) Who is eligible for SSI,
( 2 ) Whom we consider the spouse of another person who is eligible for SSI, and
( 3 ) Who was living in the same household with that person on— ( i ) The first day of the month following the date the application is filed (for the initial month of eligibility for payment based on that application);
( ii ) The date a request for reinstatement of eligibility is filed (for the month of such request); or
( iii ) The first day of the month, for all other months. An individual is considered to be living with an eligible spouse during temporary absences as defined in § 416.1149 and while receiving continued benefits under section 1611(e)(1) (E) or (G) of the Act.
*Spouse* means a person's husband or wife under the rules of §§ 416.1806 through 416.1835 of this part.
*We* and *us* mean the Social Security Administration.
*You* means a person who has applied for or has been receiving SSI benefits, or a person for whom someone else has applied for or has been receiving SSI benefits.
[45 FR 71795, Oct. 30, 1980. Redesignated at 46 FR 29211, May 29, 1981; 46 FR 42063, Aug. 19, 1981, as amended at 60 FR 16376, Mar. 30, 1995; 64 FR 31975, June 15, 1999; 65 FR 16815, Mar. 30, 2000]
#### § 266.12 Effect of matters or actions submitted or taken by legal guardian, etc.

All matters and actions in connection with an annuity submitted or taken by the guardian or other person legally vested with the care of the person or estate of an incompetent or a minor shall be considered by the Board in the same manner and with the same effect as though such matters or actions had been submitted or taken by the ward, if the ward had capacity to act in his or her own behalf; *Provided, however,* That the Board may, if it deems it necessary, require the guardian or other person legally vested with the care of the person or estate of an incompetent or a minor to submit a certified copy of an order from the court of appointment authorizing some particular action which the guardian or other person legally vested with the care of the person or estate desires to take in connection with the application.
#### § 404.2103 Definitions.

For purposes of this subpart:

*Accept the beneficiary as a client for VR services* means that the State VR agency determines that the individual is eligible for VR services and places the individual into an active caseload status for development of an individualized written rehabilitation program.

*Act* means the Social Security Act, as amended.

*Commissioner* means the Commissioner of Social Security or the Commissioner's designee.

*Disability* means “disability” or “blindness” as defined in sections 216(i) and 223 of the Act.

*Disability beneficiary* means a disabled individual who is entitled to benefits under section 223, 202(d), 202(e) or 202(f) of the act or is continuing to receive payment under section 225(b) of the Act after his or her disabling physical or mental impairments have ceased.

*Medical recovery* for purposes of this subpart is established when a beneficiary's disability entitlement ceases for any medical reason (other than death). The determination of medical recovery is made by the Commissioner in deciding a beneficiary's continuing entitlement to benefits.

*Place the beneficiary into an extended evaluation process* means that the State VR agency determines that an extended evaluation of the individual's VR potential is necessary to determine whether the individual is eligible for VR services and places the individual into an extended evaluation status.

*SGA* means substantial gainful activity performed by an individual as defined in §§ 404.1571 through 404.1575 or § 404.1584 of this subpart.

*State* means any of the 50 States of the United States, the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico, the District of Columbia, the Virgin Islands, or Guam. It includes the State VR agency.

*Trust Funds* means the Federal Old-Age and Survivors Insurance Trust Fund and the Federal Disability Insurance Trust Fund.

*Vocational rehabilitation services* has the meaning assigned to it under title I of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973.

*VR agency* means an agency of the State which has been designated by the State to provide vocational rehabilitation services under title I of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973.

*Waiting period* means a five consecutive calendar month period throughout which an individual must be under a disability and which must be served before disability benefits can be paid (see § 404.315(d)).

*We, us and our* refer to the Social Security Administration (SSA).

[48 FR 6293, Feb. 10, 1983, as amended at 55 FR 8454, Mar. 8, 1990; 59 FR 11912, Mar. 15, 1994; 62 FR 38452, July 18, 1997; 68 FR 40123, July 7, 2003; 83 FR 62456, Dec. 4, 2018]
### §2151w. Project and program evaluations

(a) The Administrator of the agency primarily responsible for administering subchapter I of this chapter is directed to improve the assessment and evaluation of the programs and projects carried out by that agency under this part. The Administrator shall consult with the appropriate committees of the Congress in establishing standards for such evaluations.

(b) Repealed. Pub. L. 97–113, title VII, §734(a)(1), Dec. 29, 1981, 95 Stat. 1560.

(Pub. L. 87–195, pt. I, §125, as added Pub. L. 95–424, title I, §113, Oct. 6, 1978, 92 Stat. 950; amended Pub. L. 97–113, title VII, §734(a)(1), Dec. 29, 1981, 95 Stat. 1560.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

1981—Subsec. (b). Pub. L. 97–113 struck out subsec. (b) which required an annual Presidential report on actions taken by the international financial institutions and the United Nations Development Program to improve the evaluation of their own programs.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### References to Subchapter I Deemed To Include Certain Parts of Subchapter II

References to subchapter I of this chapter are deemed to include parts IV (§2346 et seq.), VI (§2348 et seq.), and VIII (§2349aa et seq.) of subchapter II of this chapter, and references to subchapter II are deemed to exclude such parts. See section 202(b) of Pub. L. 92–226, set out as a note under section 2346 of this title, and sections 2348c and 2349aa–5 of this title.

#### Effective Date

Section effective Oct. 1, 1978, see section 605 of Pub. L. 95–424, set out as an Effective Date of 1978 Amendment note under section 2151 of this title.
#### § 234.16 When a widow(er) is eligible as an equitably entitled person.

When a widow(er) files for an LSDP and the “living with” requirement (described in § 234.21) is not met, the widow(er) could be paid as an equitably entitled person.
U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service

Sand Prairie Trail

The Periwinkle path is a (1)

mile hike across Poor Joe

Bridge, under a vine covered

archway, across willow bridge

then intersects with the

Mallard trail back to the

beginning. Watch for

interpretive signs, small

wildlife and birds.

Mallard portion is a longer

hike of three (3) miles along

Sand Prairie, the Bradley

Tram, past wildlife openings,

across Cottonmouth Bridge,

down the “cripple lizard”

section and finally

intersecting with the

Periwinkle trail (watch for

merging hikers) to the

parking lot.

Many species of snakes,

turtles, and frogs utilize this

area. The diversity of

habitats present supports a

large variety of bird species

including almost 100 species

known to nest here and many

others that utilize the area

during migration.

Hiking trail only. Pets on a

leash are permitted.

Safety: This trail will be

closed during refuge quota

deer hunts. Don’t venture out

without using insect

protection.

Periods of high water may

make this trail inaccessible.

Information concerning

accessibility may be obtained

at the refuge visitor center,

located 5 miles west of

Crossett on Highway 82.

Slough

Creek

Creek

Sand Pit

Hwy. 82

Pine 

Island 

Road

Bradley 

Tram

Pine

Island

Road

N

Periwinkle Trail - 1 mile

Mallard Trail - 3 miles

No Hunting Boundary

Recreation Site Boundary

Parking

Lot

Creek

Mallard

Trail

Periwinkle 

Trail

Crossett 

Harbor

R.V. Park

Crippl e

Liza

Recreation Site Boundary rd

Harbor

Ouachit a River

Proposed 

Observation 

Tower

Sa nd Prairie

H2O

H2O

Bean Field

Pond

Creek

Creek
htgm-ex102_15.htm



EXHIBIT 10.2

 

Amendment No. 1 to Statement of Work No. Two 

 THIS AMENDMENT No. 1 (hereinafter “Amendment 1”) to Statement of Work No. Two is effective as of July 2, 2018 (the “Amendment 1 Effective Date”) by and between HTG Molecular Diagnostics, Inc. (“HTG”) and QIAGEN Manchester Limited (“QIAGEN”).   

Whereas, QIAGEN and HTG entered into that certain Statement of Work No. Two, dated June 2, 2017 (the “Agreement”) and the parties now desire to extend the scope and duration of their Development activities under the Agreement; 

Now, therefore, based upon the above premises, and in consideration of the mutual covenants and conditions contained in the Agreement and herein, the parties agree as follows: 


	
 
	
1.
	
Pursuant to Section 4.2 of the Agreement, QIAGEN and HTG confirm they have exchanged details of their respective additional Development activities for mutual review and approval prior to the full execution of this Amendment 1.  These additional Development activities shall be subject to all terms and conditions of the Agreement. 





	
 
	
2.
	
Pursuant to Section 6.2.1 of the Agreement, QIAGEN and HTG have exchanged their additional estimated Project Costs for mutual review and approval prior to the full execution of this Amendment 1.  These additional Project Costs shall be subject to all terms and conditions of the Agreement. 





	
 
	
3.
	
Except as noted above, the Agreement as originally stated shall remain in full force and effect. 





	
 
	
4.
	
This Amendment may be executed in one or more counterparts, each of which shall be deemed an original, and all of which together shall be deemed to be one and the same instrument.  Facsimile or other electronically transmitted signatures shall be deemed original signatures. 





	
HTG/QIAGEN CONFIDENTIAL
	
Page 1 of 2






 

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, HTG and QIAGEN each has caused this Amendment 1 to be executed by its respective duly authorized representative as of the Amendment 1 Effective Date. 

 


		
	
HTG MOLECULAR DIAGNOSTICS 

By:  /s/ Timothy B. Johnson 

Name: Timothy B. Johnson

Title: President, Chief Executive Officer
	
QIAGEN MANCHESTER LIMITED

By: /s/ Roland Sackers 

Name: Roland Sackers

Title: CFO

 

	
 

 
	
 




 

HTG/QIAGEN CONFIDENTIAL Page 2 of 2
§ 404.1926 Evidence. ( a ) An applicant for benefits under an agreement shall submit the evidence needed to establish entitlement, as provided in subpart H of this part. Special evidence requirements for disability benefits are in subpart P of this part.
( b ) Evidence submitted to the competent authority or agency of a country with which the U.S. has concluded an agreement shall be considered as evidence submitted to SSA. SSA shall use the rules in §§ 404.708 and 404.709 to determine if the evidence submitted is sufficient, or if additional evidence is needed to prove initial or continuing entitlement to benefits.
( c ) If an application is filed for disability benefits, SSA shall consider medical evidence submitted to a competent authority or agency, as described in paragraph (b) of this section, and use the rules of subpart P of this part for making a disability determination.
### §881. Transferred

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section, Pub. L. 89–10, title VIII, §801, formerly title VI, §601, Apr. 11, 1965, 79 Stat. 55, renumbered title VII, §701, Pub. L. 89–750, title I, §161, Nov. 3, 1966, 80 Stat. 1204, renumbered title VIII, §801, and amended Pub. L. 90–247, title I, §§142(b), 152(c), title VII, §§702, 703, Jan. 2, 1968, 81 Stat. 799, 803, 816, 819; Pub. L. 91–230, title I, §162, Apr. 13, 1970, 84 Stat. 152; Pub. L. 94–193, §1(c), Dec. 31, 1975, 89 Stat. 1102; Pub. L. 94–482, title V, §501(l), Oct. 12, 1976, 90 Stat. 2237, which related to definitions, was renumbered Pub. L. 89–10, title X, §1001 by Pub. L. 95–561, title VIII, §801(1), (2), Nov. 1, 1978, 92 Stat. 2284, and transferred to section 3381 of this title, and was subsequently omitted in the general amendment of Pub. L. 89–10 by Pub. L. 103–382, title I, §101, Oct. 20, 1994, 108 Stat. 3519.
#### § 202.1 Statutory provisions.

The term “employer” means any carrier (as defined in subsection 1(m) of this section), and any company which is directly or indirectly owned or controlled by one or more such carriers or under common control therewith, and which operates any equipment or facility or performs any service (except trucking service, casual service, and the casual operation of equipment or facilities) in connection with the transportation of passengers or property by railroad, or the receipt, delivery, elevation, transfer in transit, refrigeration or icing, storage, or handling of property transported by railroad, and any receiver, trustee, or other individual or body, judicial or otherwise, when in the possession of the property or operating all or any part of the business of any such employer: *Provided, however,* That the term “employer” shall not include any street, interurban, or suburban electric railway, unless such railway is operating as a part of a general steam-railroad system of transportation, but shall not exclude any part of the general steam-railroad system now or hereafter operated by any other motive power. The Interstate Commerce Commission is hereby authorized and directed upon request of the Board, or upon complaint of any party interested, to determine after hearing whether any line operated by electric power falls within the terms of this proviso. The term “employer” shall also include railroad associations, traffic associations, tariff bureaus, demurrage bureaus, weighing and inspection bureaus, collection agencies and other associations, bureaus, agencies, or organizations controlled and maintained wholly or principally by two or more employers as hereinbefore defined and engaged in the performance of services in connection with or incidental to railroad transportation; and railway labor organizations, national in scope, which have been or may be organized in accordance with the provisions of the Railway Labor Act, as amended, and their State and National legislative committees and their general committees and their insurance departments and their local lodges and divisions, established pursuant to the constitution and by-laws of such organizations. (Sec. 1 (a), 50 Stat. 307; 45 U. S. C. 228a (a))

The term “employer” shall not include any company by reason of its being engaged in the mining of coal, the supplying of coal to an employer where delivery is not beyond the mine tipple, and the operation of equipment or facilities therefore, or in any of such activities. (54 Stat. 785; 45 U.S.C. 228a (a))

[4 FR 1478, Apr. 7, 1939, as amended by Board Order 41-526, 7 FR 96, Jan. 6, 1942]
I 

114TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 4122 

To amend the Immigration and Nationality Act to provide that aliens who 

were present in certain countries may not be admitted under the visa 

waiver program, and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

NOVEMBER 19, 2015 

Ms. SINEMA (for herself and Mr. SALMON) introduced the following bill; which 

was referred to the Committee on the Judiciary 

A BILL 

To amend the Immigration and Nationality Act to provide 

that aliens who were present in certain countries may 

not be admitted under the visa waiver program, and 

for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. CERTAIN ALIENS INELIGIBLE FOR VISA WAIV4 ER PROGRAM. 

5 Section 217 of the Immigration and Nationality Act 

6 (8 U.S.C. 1187) is amended by adding at the end the fol7 lowing: 

8 ‘‘(j) CERTAIN ALIENS INELIGIBLE.— 


emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 4122 IH

1 ‘‘(1) IN GENERAL.—An alien who was present 

2 in a country described in paragraph (2) during the 

3 5-year period preceding the alien’s application for 

4 admission may not be admitted under the program. 

5 ‘‘(2) COUNTRIES DESCRIBED.—A country de6 scribed in this paragraph is— 

7 ‘‘(A) a country that is designated by the 

8 Secretary of State under section 6(j) of the Ex9 port Administration Act of 1979 (50 U.S.C. 

10 2405) (as continued in effect under the Inter11 national Emergency Economic Powers Act (50 

12 U.S.C. 1701 et seq.)), section 40 of the Arms 

13 Export Control Act (22 U.S.C. 2780), section 

14 620A of the Foreign Assistance Act of 1961 

15 (22 U.S.C. 2371), or any other provision of 

16 law, as a country, the government of which has 

17 repeatedly provided support for acts of inter18 national terrorism; 

19 ‘‘(B) Afghanistan, Egypt, Iraq, Libya, 

20 Yemen, Somalia, or Nigeria; or 

21 ‘‘(C) any other country determined appro22 priate by the Secretary of State, in consultation 

23 with the Secretary of Homeland Security, the 


emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with BILLS
3 

•HR 4122 IH

1 Secretary of the Treasury, and the Director of 

2 National Intelligence.’’. 

Æ 


emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with BILLS
EXHIBIT
32.1
 
 CERTIFICATION
OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED
PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
 
 
 I, Thinh
Q. Tran, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant
to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Annual Report of
Sigma Designs, Inc. on Form 10-K for the year ended January 31, 2009 fully
complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in such Annual Report on
Form 10-K fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and
results of operations of Sigma Designs, Inc.
  
 By:
                /s/ Thinh
      Q. TranThinh
      Q. TranChairman
      of the Board, President and
                  Chief
      Executive Officer
 Date:
April 2, 2009
  E-4
#### Hall et al. v. Walton et al.

Nov. 4, 1942.

James U. Lyne and J. M. Scarbrough for appellants.

E. J. Felts and W. O. Bilyeu for appellees.

Opinion of- the Court by

Van Sant, Commissioner

—Reversing.

The action was instituted hy appellant, Pauline Stokes Hall, to have quieted her title to a lot in Auburn, Logan county, Kentucky. Her husband joined in the suit. The petition alleged that Mrs. Hall had legal title to and was in possession of the property and that defendants were claiming to jointly own an undivided one-half interest therein. Plaintiff claimed to be the owner of the property by reason of the provisions of the will of S. R. Stokes, deceased. Defendants by answer and counterclaim alleged the property was purchased by S. R. Stokes and his wife, Ida Stokes, who, intestate, predeceased her husband; that Mrs. Stokes paid one-half of the purchase price of the property; but the deed was made to the husband with the understanding that he would hold her undivided one-half interest in trust for her. They claimed the property as heirs of Mrs. Stokes. The answer further alleged the deed was made to Mr. Stokes with his wife’s consent.

Section 381.170, Kentucky Revised Statutes (Section 2353, Carroll’s Kentucky Statutes) recites:

> “When a deed is made to one person, and the consideration is paid by another no use or trust results in favor of the latter unless the grantee takes a deed in his own name without the consent of the person *780paying the consideration, or unless the grantee in violation of a trust purchases the lands deeded with the effects of another person. Such deeds are fraudulent as against the existing debts and liabilities of the person paying the consideration.”

The words of the above section of the statute are clear and unequivocal, and this court has construed them in a great number of cases to the effect that no trust will result in favor of one purchasing real estate,, or a part thereof, when the deed is made to another, unless the grantee takes the title without the consent of the person payiilg the consideration, or unless the grantee purchases the property with the funds of the other in violation of a trust. Foushee v. Foushee, 163 Ky. 524, 173 S. W. 1115; Fitzpatrick v. Roark, 179 Ky. 504, 200 S. W. 920; Crouch v. Mason, 199 Ky. 371, 251 S. W. 182; Richardson v. Webb, 281 Ky. 201, 135 S. W. (2d) 861.

Since the answer and counterclaim alleged that Mrs. Stokes consented that the deed be made to her husband, and since it is clearly shown by the pleadings that no trust was violated, it is manifest that neither exception recited above is applicable to the facts of the case. It follows that no trust resulted in favor of Mrs. Stokes, and the defendants claiming the property as her heirs are not entitled to the relief prayed in their answer and counterclaim. The demurrer to the answer as amended should have been sustained and Judgment entered in conformity with the prayer of the petition.

Wherefore, the judgment is reversed.