alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
### Regulatory Eva lu ation

Docket No. 

### FAA- D irectorate Id ent ifier: -AD



### Add the work hours. parts cos t , and number of 

### U.S. reg isteredprod u c!s 10 

### the 

### tuble below

. 

### When you ore finished. click on th e "Ur)(late 

### Fieldv ··hull on 10 

### a/IIOIIJatico//yji/1 in/he totals. 

### Upda t e Fields 

# I

Es timated Costs: Action Costs per 

### Product (e.g., aircraft, e ng in e, (e.g., Inspection, propeller, appliance) Work-hours Labor Part s Cost Tota l Costs Number of Total Cost replacement) (include cost (labor + 

## u.s. for U.S. Fleet Do not include oncondition costs here access , testin g, (@$ 85/h parts) 

### Registered and close-up) our) 

### Pr od ucts In spect ion ofMOV 

### I 

# ' 0 .00 - ''I 

### 154

... I c {. t 

### ·• 

### . ' actuators Replacement of2ea fue l spa r MOV 

### 5 ' 1.2:-

. 0

. 

### 12000 \**1~** \ 

### 34 

## , . .::n (I actuators without fuel tank access In s tall AIMS-2 BP v17 

### 7 \ _,1); I)() 

### 0 1 20 •f)n J o r later ' I I '-, ()()• i• 'Ill 'I \ l( I ll (Jii I I)!) ill

; !) 1). .i

. Hl 

### ,, n

. O.tl 

# ,, 0 .1'1 

### n 'l I I• \ 'Ill ' 

### ,' rr. • ). 

# .. •(•

.... 

### uJ•'' ' \ ttl ·J.\)(1**~'** 

### o. r H' I} ,I) II I I llf/ 

## ' (1,()1) !)/'**~** IJ.Ol) 

### ' ().(H) (.1,1'1 () !ll) 

# ' O.U1l ,, (j(•

. . 0 Oil !: .0 1. 

# ,, ' 1 

## rn

.... ii 'll : Otl

.... (I _II 

## ' \ I '1 ·)0 

# :- O.P•· f. ,1 ( l (1(1 

### 0 lid ;**~** 1 1(1 {I Of) \ 

### ll.f•, ) (I ('Jf fl Pli
The known number of products in compl iance: 

### Numb e r T o ta l Costs of compliance for 

### U.S. fl ee t: $506 , 940 Costs covered under warranty 

### (if/mo w n )**\Varrant~**


### On-Cond iti on Costs:

# ~ Action Work-hours Labor cost Parts Cost Cost per Produ ct (e.g., Inspection , ( in c lud e access , (@$85/ hour) testing , and c lose- replacement) up)

### Replacement of2ea fuel spar MOV 

### 53 0.• II 

### 12000 '·I (I. (l).!JI) 

### actuators with fuel tank 

# .. access '!! (\ ( 1{1 

# ' (\fill .;: J

- 0{1**~** l•.tll) 

# "' () ill) ) \1 fHJ 

### Special considerations for Economic Analysis (Use this field to explain anything in the Estimaled Costs table that was assumed or might not be obvious. This field can also be used to explain warranty costs): 

### FAA assumes that all AfMS-2 airplanes are upgraded to AlMS-2 BP v 17 or later instead of upgrading fuel spar MOV actuators to part number MA30A I017. Executive Order 12866: 

### Could the AD be considered a "s ignificant regulat01y

# action"?**~** YES* 

## 0 NO 181 *Explanation: DOT Regulatory Policies and Proced ures: 

### Is the AD significant?

# ~ YES* 

## 0 NO 

## 181 *Explanation: Regu latory Flexibility Act: 

### Will the AD have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities? Explain for either a Yes or No answer.

# ~ YES 

## 0 NO 

## 181 Explanation: Intrastate Aviation in Alaska: 

### This AD cou ld affect intrastate aviation in Alaska. I s it appropriate to include specific requirements for aircraft operated in Alaska where aviation might be the only mode of transportation?

# ~ YES* 

## D NO 

## 181 *Explanation:
I 

114TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 4115 

To adjust the amount of monthly old-age, survivors, and disability insurance 

payments under title II of the Social Security Act based on localitybased comparability payment rates. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

NOVEMBER 19, 2015 

Ms. MENG introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee 

on Ways and Means 

A BILL 

To adjust the amount of monthly old-age, survivors, and 

disability insurance payments under title II of the Social 

Security Act based on locality-based comparability payment rates. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Locality-based Social 

5 Security Benefits Act of 2015’’. 


SSpencer on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 4115 IH

1 SEC. 2. SOCIAL SECURITY BENEFIT AMOUNTS ADJUSTED 

2 TO REFLECT LOCALITY-BASED COM3 PARABILITY PAYMENT RATES. 

4 Notwithstanding title II of the Social Security Act, 

5 the Commissioner of Social Security shall increase the 

6 monthly benefit amount to which each individual is other7 wise entitled under such title by the percentage deter8 mined by the President under sections 5304 and 5304a 

9 of title 5, United States Code, for the locality pay area 

10 (as established in section 531.603 of title 5, Code of Fed11 eral Regulations) in which the individual resides at the 

12 time of such increase. 

Æ 


SSpencer on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
### §2347h. Human rights report

#### (a) In general

Not later than March 1 of each year, the Secretary of State shall submit to the Speaker of the House of Representatives and the Committee on Foreign Relations of the Senate a report describing, to the extent practicable, any involvement of a foreign military or defense ministry civilian participant in education and training activities under this part in a violation of internationally recognized human rights reported under section 2151n(d) of this title subsequent to such participation.

#### (b) Form

The report described in subsection (a) shall be in unclassified form, but may include a classified annex.

(Pub. L. 87–195, pt. II, §549, as added Pub. L. 107–228, div. B, title XII, §1212(a), Sept. 30, 2002, 116 Stat. 1428.)
Frank Church-River of No Return Wilderness

Sawtooth Wilderness

Borah Peak

Red Mountain

Lemhi Range

King Mountain

Camas Creek

Loon Creek

Diamond Peak

Seafoam

Pioneer Mountains

Prophyry

Boulder - White Clouds

Pahsimeroi Mountain

Squaw Creek

White Knob

Cha Red Hill llis Creek

Greylock

Taylor Mountain

Hanson Lakes

Copper Basin Jumpoff Mountain

Grouse Peak

Cold Springs

Wood Canyon

Warm Creek

Railroad Ridge

Blue Bunch

Spring Basin

£¤93

£¤20

£¤26

¬«28

¬«75

¬«21

¬«46

¬«22

¬«23

May

Arco

Pine

Moore

Lemhi

Ellis

Carey

Baker

Shoup

Grouse

Leslie

Mackay

Chilly

Picabo

Hailey

Corral

Cobalt

Salmon

Carmen

Gilmore

Leadore

Ketchum

Atlanta

Clayton

Stanley

Sunbeam

Challis

Gannett

Berenice

Bellevue

Patterson

Richfield

Hill City

Fairfield

Big Creek

Butte City

Lost River

Darlington

Sun Valley

North Fork

Featherville

Management Themes Applied to Idaho Roadless Areas

Wild Land Recreation

Primitive

Backcountry/Restoration

General Forest , Rangeland and Grassland

Forest Plan Special Areas

Wilderness

National Forest System Lands

(Other ownership is not displayed)

Challis Existing Plan Management Themes

10 5 0 10 I Miles

The USDA Forest Service uses the most current and complete

data available. GIS Data and product accuracy may vary.

Using GIS products for puposes other than those for which they

were intended may yield inaccurate or misleading results.

The USDA Forest Service reserves the right to correct, update,

modify, or replace GIS products without notification.
#### Bobal Realty Corporation, Appellant, v. Jerome Steiner, Respondent. Bobal Realty Corporation, Appellant, v. Charles Goldhill, Respondent.

Motion for leave to appeal to the Appellate Division denied, without costs. Present — Lewis, P. J., Carswell, Johnston, Adel and Wenzel, JJ.
.J00S0!VVING _ ` ry~//~~- 

WEikfi

~pR TN~ 

. esviii.e 

Missouri 

m —11 ~ — 1. ---- . ......... 

September 5, 2014 

Mr. Kevin Schlemmer, Chief of the Essential Air Service Division 

Mr. Albert Muldoon 

1200 New Jersey Ave SE 

Washington, DC 20590 

Dear Mr. Schlemmer and Mr. Muldoon: 

Thank you for the opportunity to comment on the Essential Air Services proposals submitted for air 

service at the Waynesville/St. Robert Regional Airport at Forney Field on Fort Leonard Wood. Our 

commitment to air service for our communities led to a unique partnership between the Cities of 

Waynesville, St. Robert and Fort Leonard Wood. As the civilian sponsors of the existing joint use 

Agreement on Fort Leonard Wood, the continuance of viable air service from the Fort Leonard Wood 

Region is of prime importance to the Cities of St. Robert and Waynesville and our regional neighbors. 

Although, we were pleased with the submitted proposals, based on our review of the EAS proposals, the Cities of 

Waynesville and St. Robert recommend accepting the proposal submitted by Cape Air. The cities are pleased with the 

proposal of Cape Air and recommend Cape Air as the best balance between value and service for our community. The 

Cities of Waynesville and St. Robert would also like to recommend a four (4) year contract. 

On behalf of the Cities of Waynesville and St. Robert, thank you for your continued support of the EAS program. Please 

do not hesitate to contact us if you need further input. 

Sincerely, 

~GMayor Luge Hardman 

City of Waynesville 

Mayor Luge Hardman 601 Historic 66 West 

City Administrator Bruce 1-Iarrill Waynesville, MO 65583 

City Clerk Carol Welch Phone: (573) 774-6171 

Fax: (573) 774-5647
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          APR-30-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             MAY-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               OCT-31-1997
<CASH>                                         182,983
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                3,776,116
<ALLOWANCES>                                   174,637
<INVENTORY>                                  1,889,004
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             7,469,808
<PP&E>                                       5,684,085
<DEPRECIATION>                               1,532,564
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              11,648,622
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        4,830,933
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        10,140
<OTHER-SE>                                   2,319,556
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                11,648,622
<SALES>                                     11,680,151
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            11,680,151
<CGS>                                        9,504,722
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               10,837,505
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             176,315
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                666,331
<INCOME-TAX>                                    14,925
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            651,406
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   651,406
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.64
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
Editorial Note on Part 70
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 70 appear by T.D. ATF-450, 66 FR 29022-29030, May 29, 2001.

§ 70.263 Special rules applicable in case of extension of time by agreement. ( a ) *Scope.* If, within the period prescribed in section 6511(a) of the Internal Revenue Code for the filing of a claim for credit or refund, an agreement extending the period for assessment of a tax has been made in accordance with the provisions of section 6501(c)(4) of the Internal Revenue Code, the special rules provided in this section become applicable. This section shall not apply to any claim filed, or credit or refund allowed if no claim is filed, either ( 1 ) prior to the execution of an agreement extending the period in which assessment may be made, or
( 2 ) more than 6 months after the expiration of the period within which an assessment may be made pursuant to the agreement or any extension thereof.
( b ) *Period in which claim may be filed.* Claim for credit or refund of an overpayment may be filed, or credit or refund may be allowed if no claim is filed, at any time within which an assessment may be made pursuant to an agreement, or any extension thereof, under section 6501(c)(4), and for 6 months thereafter.
( c ) *Limit on amount to be credited or refunded.* ( 1 ) If a claim is filed within the time prescribed in paragraph (b) of this section, the amount of the credit or refund allowed or made shall not exceed the portion of the tax paid after the execution of the agreement and before the filing of the claim, plus the amount that could have been properly credited or refunded under the provisions of section 6511(b)(2) if a claim had been filed on the date of the execution of the agreement.
( 2 ) If no claim is filed, the amount of credit or refund allowed or made within the time prescribed in paragraph (b) of this section shall not exceed the portion of the tax paid after the execution of the agreement and before the making of the credit or refund, plus the amount that could have been properly credited or refunded under the provisions of section 6511(b)(2) if a claim had been filed on the date of the execution of the agreement.
( d ) *Effective date of agreement.* The agreement referred to in this section shall become effective when signed by the taxpayer and the appropriate TTB officer.
(26 U.S.C. 6511)
[T.D. ATF-251, 52 FR 19314, May 22, 1987. Redesignated by T.D. ATF-301, 55 FR 47606, Nov. 14, 1990]
### §2401. Definitions

#### (1) Anti-doping organization

The term "anti-doping organization" has the meaning given the term in Article 2 of the Convention.

#### (2) Athlete

The term "athlete" has the meaning given the term in Article 2 of the Convention.

#### (3) Code

The term "Code" means the World Anti-Doping Code most recently adopted by WADA on March 5, 2003.

#### (4) Convention

The term "Convention" means the United Nations Educational, Scientific, and Cultural Organization International Convention Against Doping in Sport done at Paris October 19, 2005, and ratified by the United States in 2008.

#### (5) Major international sport competition

The term "Major International Sport Competition"— 1

(A) means a competition—

(i) in which one or more United States athletes and three or more athletes from other countries participate;

(ii) that is governed by the anti-doping rules and principles of the Code; and

(iii) in which—

(I) the competition organizer or sanctioning body receives sponsorship or other financial support from an organization doing business in the United States; or

(II) the competition organizer or sanctioning body receives compensation for the right to broadcast the competition in the United States; and

(B) includes a competition that is a single event or a competition that consists of a series of events held at different times which, when combined, qualify an athlete or team for an award or other recognition.

#### (6) Person

The term "person" means any individual, partnership, corporation, association, or other entity.

#### (7) Prohibited method

The term "prohibited method" has the meaning given the term in Article 2 of the Convention.

#### (8) Prohibited substance

The term "prohibited substance" has the meaning given the term in Article 2 of the Convention.

#### (9) Scheme in commerce

The term "scheme in commerce" means any scheme effectuated in whole or in part through the use in interstate or foreign commerce of any facility for transportation or communication.

#### (10) USADA

The term "USADA" means the United States Anti-Doping Agency.

#### (11) WADA

The term "WADA" means the World Anti-Doping Agency.

(Pub. L. 116–206, §2, Dec. 4, 2020, 134 Stat. 998.)

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Short Title

Pub. L. 116–206, §1, Dec. 4, 2020, 134 Stat. 998, provided that: "This Act [enacting this chapter and amending section 3663A of Title 18, Crimes and Criminal Procedure] may be cited as the 'Rodchenkov Anti-Doping Act of 2019'."

1 So in original. Term is not capitalized as used in this chapter.
j' ( 

## . " I UUI,pQfl".."l¢ 1'ftImpOrkltloll Oll.ce 01 1l".e . sec:re"JlV 01**rrOr!sPO"~r«)l'\** Chief. I)ocumentary Sc'rvkes Div. 

### Depanment of 

### 'TranspOrtation Wash.ington. D , C , 20590 

### OESIGNA'TIONOFAGENTFOR sERVIC£OF 

### NOTICE. PROCESs. 'oRDERS 

### peCISfONS**A~D REqpi~E,M~Nf,$** 

ATTENTION: 

## DOCKET SECTION. C·SS • . • . ' f 

### Spirit AirlineS

office at 

### 2"800 Executiv¢ 

## Way, .. Miramar ,FL**339~5**

· (AdOrcss) 

### • having its principal

hereby . d\:signates. 

### pl,lrsoani

### to~ction;4()JOj of Titie , 49 pfthe

### t.r,S.C,*Jfpm~erl)'sectionIOO5IbJof [he 

### Feder.!1 A\ ' i;1(jpnAc:( 

### ofi958. as amended}

### !~e**pe~name(fbeloW:lsits A8eni~ponwbom** **~r\ it'eof** **lln ~dticcs**  and piOl:ess; and aU ordtr...

### decision~. and require.nenlo; of 

### the

### ~pm1l1'1entot**T** raftsPoitatiori 

### nuiy**beina~tora,j<!** oh6ehalf 

### of )aid . 

### camer . . hereby c<lnce.ling illl previou:.**de~i~nati()l1li** 

### of**~gen(s** 

## made , byit 

# 16 {he ' PO". ' ... " ' , , . , . ", ' ,' " " ." , ; ' ' . '

. ," .' , ,. ' . t. 

### Name of Agent ____ Jo

..... · ·

### an~**;.;.;n;.;;;,e;.. '**  ...,;W..;.;. · ;...

• ' ...

Y;;,;;:o;.:: · UM

... · :&;;

' ..... .......---...._--.; .................. ,.,......, ............ . """ ....... --'"_ ........ _ ..................... __ ......... _**(Ple~ .**  

### · P"int) . .

P .. : •• __ . ,,- -- .":"

_ -, ... ;... .".- - -," - •• ...:..:. • • _ • .,;..



### . Address**_..:..17l...;5~O:..~K:.: ·**  

### •**....:::.S..::::tr~ e:;:.;e:;:.;t"",**  .... · ...



### N'i"

. . W

4. · ·, ....

· ·wSUl;oj;l.1.;1· t>o.li.e

... · ' ..



### '2;,\oDI.I.jQ:.j,j**...:W:,:;;a::::s:;.:h_:fug;'::Q.t.:::.;o~n,,"!L..** .**.;;D~ C** **_a~O~G~O/oe 6~** **·** 

### __ --'- ____ _**~** . 

### The Agent so designated · has

### wricte~bis 

## ' naJrie -and alsp

### hisinit~s in . 

### the foUQw l gg space: • •

_ . . , '" ... . . . - ' ... . , " . ", ": ': ' .: ' , " •. 1 . ( '- .' • .• . •. ._ 

### Name

,**~** 

### ---. ....... __ ..:;.... ....... ..;..;.....;;A;.;;;;i;,:;rc.;;l;=:i ..**n;=:e~s;.;.;. ·**  

### . ....... __ ....... .;..-- _________ ..--- has caused these

### (Na~**'. Qt;~~n1pariy)**  

## ' . IN W



## . ' Ben**~ldanza** presents**t~** be 

### signed in 

## its**~bY** 

## . .... ' ___**~** 

## __ --'- _____ ....................... """'""_ ...... _________ .President**(PI~a~Pr:IOt)** 

### . of said company • and 

### to

## beatt~stedut1d~iitsc;OrpOrateseaLby .**'** :." . .' .:,.**~** , -. ,. . " ,- " , ,- . ". . . . ' :

By;
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

DAY HIGH

 18,799

 19,223

 17,905

 16,614

 16,541

 16,450

 17,052

 16,750

 18,607

 19,831

 21,788

 21,439

 21,095

 20,998

 21,277

 20,613

 18,609

 16,660

 16,784

 17,004

 17,140

 18,777

 18,979

 19,490

 19,832

 19,931

 17,993

 18,523

 16,847

 16,863

 8,829

 9,802

 8,247

 7,549

 6,536

 5,329

 9,130

 9,352

 8,962

 9,079

 10,158

 9,831

 9,061

 8,265

 8,681

 8,857

 7,986

 7,171

 7,410

 8,077

 9,221

 8,344

 8,109

 8,225

 8,067

 7,781

 6,413

 6,781

 6,707

 5,203

 13,730

 14,676

 13,646

 12,702

 12,594

 12,177

 12,942

 12,664

 13,108

 14,220

 15,411

 15,039

 14,149

 13,672

 14,191

 14,119

 12,610

 12,316

 12,089

 12,048

 12,532

 12,614

 12,680

 13,155

 13,226

 12,848

 12,265

 11,909

 11,285

 11,207

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

JUNE 2014 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: July 31, 2014

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

PITTSBURG BOTTOM ON THE SACRAMENTO RIVER
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY HIGH

 1,111

 921

 1,866

 1,428

 1,778

 1,280

 765

 476

 458

 434

 839

 1,309

 1,204

 794

 622

 475

 427

 320

 315

 267

 303

 307

 351

 255

 278

 342

 377

 498

 777

 898

 867

 208

 212

 215

 216

 219

 222

 219

 215

 213

 215

 217

 218

 217

 214

 213

 212

 216

 225

 231

 230

 232

 233

 232

 234

 234

 236

 240

 241

 239

 238

 238

 340

 283

 490

 420

 481

 442

 321

 248

 242

 245

 293

 393

 350

 282

 262

 241

 244

 242

 246

 242

 250

 244

 251

 243

 243

 256

 265

 291

 329

 343

 344

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

DECEMBER 2009 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: January 4, 2010

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

RIO VISTA ON THE SACRAMENTO RIVER
**EXHIBIT 31.1**

**CERTIFICATION**

I, Robert deRose, certify that:****

1.

I have reviewed this amended quarterly report on Form 10-QSB/A of Education Lending Group, Inc.;

2.

Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain anyuntrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by thisreport;

3.

Based on my knowledge, thefinancial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the small business issuer as of, and for, the periods presentedin this report;

4.

The small businessissuer’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the small business issuer and have:

a)

Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, orcaused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the small business issuer, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within thoseentities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

b)

Evaluated the effectiveness of the small business issuer’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in thisreport our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

c)

Disclosed in this report any change in the small business issuer’s most recent fiscalquarter (the small business issuer’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the small business issuer’s internal control over financial reporting;and

5.

The small business issuer’sother certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal controls over financial reporting, to the small business issuer’s auditors and the audit committee of the small business issuer’s board ofdirectors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

a)

All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which arereasonably likely to adversely affect the small business issuer’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and 

b)

Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the small businessissuer’s internal controls over financial reporting. 

 

| Date: February 27, 2004 |   | By:     | /s/ROBERT deROSE            |
|-------------------------|--------|--------------|-----------------------------|
|                    |   |         |                             |
|                    |   | Name:   | **Robert deRose**           |
|                    |   | Title:  | **Chief Executive Officer** |