alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 404.948 Deciding a case without an oral hearing before an administrative law judge. ( a ) *Decision fully favorable.* If the evidence in the hearing record supports a finding in favor of you and all the parties on every issue, the administrative law judge may issue a hearing decision based on a preponderance of the evidence without holding an oral hearing. The notice of the decision will state that you have the right to an oral hearing and to examine the evidence on which the administrative law judge based the decision.
( b ) *Parties do not wish to appear.* ( 1 ) The administrative law judge may decide a case on the record and not conduct an oral hearing if— ( i ) You and all the parties indicate in writing that you do not wish to appear before the administrative law judge at an oral hearing; or
( ii ) You live outside the United States, you do not inform us that you wish to appear, and there are no other parties who wish to appear.
( 2 ) When an oral hearing is not held, the administrative law judge shall make a record of the material evidence. The record will include the applications, written statements, certificates, reports, affidavits, and other documents that were used in making the determination under review and any additional evidence you or any other party to the hearing present in writing. The decision of the administrative law judge must be based on this record.
( c ) *Case remanded for a revised determination.* ( 1 ) The administrative law judge may remand a case to the appropriate component of our office for a revised determination if there is reason to believe that the revised determination would be fully favorable to you. This could happen if the administrative law judge receives new and material evidence or if there is a change in the law that permits the favorable determination.
( 2 ) Unless you request the remand, the administrative law judge shall notify you that your case has been remanded and tell you that if you object, you must notify him or her of your objections within 10 days of the date the case is remanded or we will assume that you agree to the remand. If you object to the remand, the administrative law judge will consider the objection and rule on it in writing.
[45 FR 52081, Aug. 5, 1980, as amended at 51 FR 303, Jan. 3, 1986; 73 FR 76944, Dec. 18, 2008; 75 FR 33168, June 11, 2010; 76 FR 65370, Oct. 21, 2011]
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          AUG-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             SEP-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               NOV-30-1996
<CASH>                                          41,293
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   58,931
<ALLOWANCES>                                    15,024
<INVENTORY>                                     39,498
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                          37,561
<DEPRECIATION>                                  14,123
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 222,086
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0
<BONDS>                                         73,090
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           184
<OTHER-SE>                                      37,946
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   222,086
<SALES>                                         10,947
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                25,089
<CGS>                                            1,634
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   10,017
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                12,777
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                 1,711
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               2,843
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  2,295
<INCOME-TAX>                                     1,066
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              1,229
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     1,166<F1>
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.06
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.06
<FN>
<F1>EXCLUDES $63 OF INCOME ASSOCIATED WITH MINORITY INTEREST
</FN>
        

</TABLE>
EXHIBIT 3.47
 Delaware
 
 The First State
  
 /s/ Harriett Smith WindsorHarriet Smith Windsor, Secretary of State 4288639     8100
    
    AUTHENTICATION: 5372856070069509
    
    Date: 01-22-07




---



##### 



CERTIFICATE OF FORMATION
 OF
 MUSKOGEE REGIONAL MEDICAL CENTER, LLC
      th
 Muskogee Regional Medical Center, LLC/s/ D. Andrew SlusserD. Andrew Slusser, Authorized Person STATE OF DELAWARE  
SECRETARY OF STATE
DIVISION OF CORPORATIONSDELIVERED 03:48 PM 01/22/2007FILED 03:26 PM 01/22/2007
SRV 070069509  4288639 FILE
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY HIGH

 19,492

 23,579

 22,540

 23,758

 24,657

 23,586

 21,750

 24,915

 25,623

 21,847

 19,691

 20,153

 21,424

 21,788

 21,601

 21,506

 19,608

 19,050

 19,003

 18,900

 20,159

 19,723

 16,255

 15,029

 14,589

 18,305

 21,454

 12,786

 17,930

 16,600

 17,597

 11,688

 10,729

 11,305

 11,259

 12,030

 12,187

 11,910

 12,312

 14,401

 14,896

 12,447

 11,515

 12,353

 12,648

 12,070

 11,927

 9,052

 8,529

 7,657

 7,616

 7,482

 7,755

 7,300

 7,221

 7,220

 8,592

 12,266

 7,877

 6,373

 6,030

 5,804

 14,986

 16,046

 16,740

 17,304

 17,895

 17,740

 17,410

 18,488

 19,620

 18,040

 15,348

 15,088

 15,140

 15,725

 16,406

 16,423

 15,133

 14,386

 13,470

 13,291

 13,184

 13,069

 12,383

 11,824

 11,655

 13,501

 15,644

 10,000

 10,996

 11,164

 11,593

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

DECEMBER 2006 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: January 4, 2007

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

PORT CHICAGO TOP IN SUISUN BAY
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

DAY HIGH

 7,964

 7,413

 7,633

 7,251

 5,918

 6,765

 6,198

 7,168

 10,112

 9,113

 8,831

 9,416

 9,662

 10,384

 9,885

 9,423

 9,720

 10,920

 11,598

 12,819

 13,414

 11,300

 11,572

 10,802

 10,022

 11,059

 9,858

 12,062

 12,549

 13,263

 2,662

 2,367

 2,425

 2,293

 1,830

 1,421

 1,660

 1,789

 2,649

 2,583

 2,598

 2,887

 3,063

 3,486

 3,837

 3,774

 3,608

 3,457

 3,798

 4,328

 5,940

 5,399

 3,355

 3,947

 3,185

 4,344

 4,539

 3,003

 5,475

 5,573

 4,902

 4,233

 4,056

 3,897

 3,409

 3,366

 4,041

 5,208

 5,705

 5,521

 5,605

 5,803

 6,168

 6,428

 6,519

 6,054

 6,001

 6,300

 6,835

 7,518

 9,359

 8,060

 6,791

 6,430

 6,208

 7,259

 7,250

 7,748

 8,526

 8,708

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

SEPTEMBER 2000 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: October 5, 2000

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

PITTSBURG TOP ON THE SACRAMENTO RIVER
### §7843. Consolidated reporting

#### (a) In general

In order to simplify reporting requirements and reduce reporting burdens, the Secretary shall establish procedures and criteria under which a State educational agency, in consultation with the Governor of the State, may submit a consolidated State annual report.

#### (b) Contents

The report shall contain information about the programs included in the report, including the performance of the State under those programs, and other matters as the Secretary determines are necessary, such as monitoring activities.

#### (c) Replacement

The report shall replace separate individual annual reports for the programs included in the consolidated State annual report.

(Pub. L. 89–10, title VIII, §8303, formerly title IX, §9303, as added Pub. L. 107–110, title IX, §901, Jan. 8, 2002, 115 Stat. 1969; renumbered title VIII, §8303, Pub. L. 114–95, title VIII, §8001(a)(3), Dec. 10, 2015, 129 Stat. 2088, 2089.)
**Exhibit 31.2**

 

CERTIFICATION

 

I, Lawrence Kong, certify that:

 

1. I have reviewed this Annual Report on Form10-K of Bidz.com, Inc.;

 

2. Based on my knowledge, this report doesnot contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a materialfact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances underwhich such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this report;

 

3. Based on my knowledge, the financialstatements, and other financial information included in this report, fairlypresent in all material respects the financial condition, results of operationsand cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in thisreport;

 

4. The registrant’s other certifying officerand I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls andprocedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for theregistrant and have:

 

a) Designed such disclosure controls andprocedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designedunder our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to theregistrant is made known to us by others, particularly during the period inwhich this report is being prepared;

 

b) Evaluated the effectiveness of theregistrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this reportour conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls andprocedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on suchevaluation; and

 

c) Disclosed in this report any change in theregistrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during theregistrant’s most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or isreasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting; and

 

5. The registrant’s other certifying officerand I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal controlover financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committeeof registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalentfunctions):

 

a) All significant deficiencies and materialweaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financialreporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’sability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

 

b) Any fraud, whether or not material, thatinvolves management or other employees who have a significant role in theregistrant’s internal control over financial reporting.

 

Date: March 29, 2006
|   | /s/ Lawrence  Kong                                                      |   |
|--------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------|
|   | Lawrence  Kong                                                          |
|   | Chief  Financial Officer  (Principal Financial and  Accounting Officer) |

 

----
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                           5
       
<S>                                 <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                       9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                   DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                        SEP-30-1997
<CASH>                              789,338
<SECURITIES>                        960,867  <F1>
<RECEIVABLES>                       170,895
<ALLOWANCES>                        0
<INVENTORY>                         0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                    0
<PP&E>                              19,735,533 <F2>
<DEPRECIATION>                      5,191,566
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                      16,569,938
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>               309,006
<BONDS>                             11,412,008 <F3>
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>               0
<PREFERRED>                         0
<COMMON>                            4,292,945  <F4>
<OTHER-SE>                          0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>        16,569,938
<SALES>                             0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                    1,657,635  <F5>
<CGS>                               0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                       1,014,639  <F6>
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                    (38,730)   <F7>
<LOSS-PROVISION>                    0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                  733,632
<INCOME-PRETAX>                     0
<INCOME-TAX>                        0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                 0
<DISCONTINUED>                      0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                     0
<CHANGES>                           0
<NET-INCOME>                        (51,906)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                       0
<EPS-DILUTED>                       0


<FN>
<F1>   "SECURITIES" REPRESENTS INVESTMENT IN JOINT VENTURE
<F2>   "PP&E" REPRESENTS INVESTMENT IN REAL ESTATE [LAND AND
          BUILDING]
<F3>   "BONDS" REPRESENTS MORTGAGES PAYABLE.
<F4>   "COMMON" REPRESENTS TOTAL PARTNERS' CAPITAL
<F5>   "TOTAL REVENUES" REPRESENTS RENTAL, INTEREST, AND OTHER
          INCOME
<F6>   "TOTAL COSTS" REPRESENTS TOTAL EXPENSES LESS INTEREST
          EXPENSE
<F7>   "OTHER EXPENSES" REPRESENTS EQUITY AND MINORITY INTEREST
          IN JOINT VENTURES' NET INCOME/LOSS
</FN>
        

</TABLE>
Editorial Note on Part 416
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 416 appear at 68 FR 53509, Sept. 11, 2003.

§ 416.1409 How to request reconsideration. ( a ) We shall reconsider an initial determination if you or any other party to the reconsideration files a written request at one of our offices within 60 days after the date you receive notice of the initial determination (or within the extended time period if we extend the time as provided in paragraph (b) of this section).
( b ) *Extension of time to request a reconsideration.* If you want a reconsideration of the initial determination but do not request one in time, you may ask us for more time to request a reconsideration. Your request for an extension of time must be in writing and it must give the reasons why the request for reconsideration was not filed within the stated time period. If you show us that you had good cause for missing the deadline, we will extend the time period. To determine whether good cause exists, we use the standards explained in § 416.1411.
```

[Congressional Bills 114th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 4083 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

114th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 4083

To exclude the Internal Revenue Service from the provisions of title 5, 
      United States Code, relating to labor-management relations.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           November 19, 2015

     Mr. Gosar (for himself, Mr. Brat, Mr. Buck, Mr. Crawford, Mr. 
    Culberson, Mr. Franks of Arizona, Mr. Gohmert, Mr. Harper, Mr. 
 Huelskamp, Mr. King of Iowa, Mrs. Lummis, Mr. Miller of Florida, Mr. 
 Olson, Mr. Posey, Mr. Rice of South Carolina, Mr. Rogers of Alabama, 
 Mr. Rokita, Mr. Rouzer, Mr. Stewart, Mr. Tipton, Mr. Wilson of South 
   Carolina, and Mr. Babin) introduced the following bill; which was 
      referred to the Committee on Oversight and Government Reform

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To exclude the Internal Revenue Service from the provisions of title 5, 
      United States Code, relating to labor-management relations.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Preventing Unionization of Revenue 
Service Employees Act'' or the ``PURSE Act''.

SEC. 2. EXCLUSION OF INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE.

    (a) In General.--Section 7103(a)(3) of title 5, United States Code, 
is amended--
            (1) in subparagraph (G), by striking ``or'';
            (2) in subparagraph (H), by striking the period and 
        inserting ``; or''; and
            (3) by adding after subparagraph (H) the following:
                    ``(I) the Internal Revenue Service;''.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendments made by this section shall take 
effect on the date of the enactment of this Act, notwithstanding any 
provision of law, rule, or regulation, or of any preexisting collective 
bargaining agreement.
                                 <all>
```
EXHIBIT 32.1
                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

The undersigned Richard Starke, President of Lotus Capital Corp. hereby
certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) the quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of Lotus Capital Corp. for the period
ended March 31, 2005 (the "Report") fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Lotus Capital
Corp.


Dated: May 18, 2005

/s/ Richard Starke
------------------
Richard Starke
President
(Principal Executive Officer)
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

DAY HIGH

 24,490

 25,117

 25,779

 25,524

 26,877

 26,363

 25,891

 24,556

 24,627

 25,255

 26,205

 25,560

 26,405

 26,449

 27,208

 27,043

 25,533

 24,061

 22,894

 22,214

 21,692

 24,545

 24,890

 24,790

 25,542

 26,425

 28,316

 24,665

 24,986

 25,296

 11,311

 11,046

 12,213

 11,615

 12,721

 14,257

 15,458

 16,462

 15,973

 15,372

 15,441

 14,551

 14,000

 13,080

 12,124

 13,229

 12,739

 12,510

 12,382

 12,847

 12,400

 13,880

 14,644

 14,141

 13,924

 13,947

 9,708

 12,523

 11,141

 11,179

 18,154

 18,640

 19,228

 19,367

 20,971

 21,736

 21,146

 20,719

 20,241

 20,271

 21,017

 20,181

 20,092

 19,785

 20,022

 20,215

 19,373

 18,592

 18,299

 18,152

 17,013

 19,095

 19,493

 19,626

 19,887

 20,228

 21,155

 18,553

 18,243

 18,598

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

NOVEMBER 2004 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: December 15, 2004

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

PORT CHICAGO BOTTOM IN SUISUN BAY
### §2687. Use of appropriated funds for unusual expenses of United States Representative to Organization of American States

The Secretary of State is authorized to use appropriated funds for unusual expenses similar to those authorized by section 5913 of title 5 incident to the operation and maintenance of the living quarters of the United States Representative to the Organization of American States.

(Aug. 1, 1956, ch. 841, title I, §17, as added Pub. L. 94–141, title I, §101(c), Nov. 29, 1975, 89 Stat. 756; renumbered title I, Pub. L. 97–241, title II, §202(a), Aug. 24, 1982, 96 Stat. 282.)
# C_2012334EN.01000801.xml

| 31.10.2012 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 334/8 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

31.10.2012

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 334/8

---

Summary information communicated by Member States on State aid granted in accordance with Commission Regulation (EC) No 736/2008 on the application of Articles 87 and 88 of the EC Treaty to State aid to small and medium-sized enterprises active in the production, processing and marketing of fisheries products

2012/C 334/06

Aid No: SA.33634 (11/XF)

Member State: Italy

Region/Authority granting the aid: Ministero delle politiche agricole e forestali

Title of aid scheme/name of company receiving an ad hoc aid: ricambio generazionale e sviluppo delle imprese giovanili nel settore della pesca e dell'acquacoltura — Fondo dello sviluppo dell'imprenditoria giovanile in agricoltura l.n. 296 del 2006.

Legal basis: Decreto ministeriale n. 115 del 2011; decreti direttoriali attuativi n. 117, 118 e 119 del 2011.

Annual expenditure planned under the scheme or amount of individual aid granted: EUR 500 000

Maximum aid intensity: Up to 100 %

Date of entry into force:

Duration of aid scheme:

Objective of aid: To encourage the replacement of elderly fishermen by younger ones and the development of fisheries businesses started by young people

Indicate which of Articles 8 to 24 is used: Articles 11, 20 and 21 of Regulation (EC) No 736/2008

Activity concerned: Fisheries and aquaculture

Name and address of the granting authority:

| Ministero delle politiche agricole e forestali |
| --- |
| Viale dell'Arte 16 |
| 00142 Roma RM |
| ITALIA |

Ministero delle politiche agricole e forestali

Viale dell'Arte 16

00142 Roma RM

ITALIA

Web address where the full text of the scheme or the criteria and conditions under which ad hoc aid is granted outside of an aid scheme can be found: http://www.politicheagricole.gov.it

Justification: Indicate why a State aid scheme has been established instead of assistance under the European Fisheries Fund:

This aid scheme supports generational renewal and the development of businesses started by young people in the fisheries and aquaculture sector by means of technological innovation, training, the promotion of fisheries products and pilot projects.

---