alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
I 

114TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 4193 

To authorize the expansion of an existing hydroelectric project. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

DECEMBER 8, 2015 

Mr. YOUNG of Alaska introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Natural Resources 

A BILL 

To authorize the expansion of an existing hydroelectric 

project. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. TERROR LAKE HYDROELECTRIC PROJECT 

4 UPPER HIDDEN BASIN DIVERSION AUTHOR5 IZATION. 

6 (a) DEFINITIONS.—In this section: 

7 (1) TERROR LAKE HYDROELECTRIC

8 PROJECT.—The term ‘‘Terror Lake Hydroelectric 

9 Project’’ means the project identified in section 1325 

10 of the Alaska National Interest Lands Conservation 


SSpencer on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 4193 IH

1 Act (16 U.S.C. 3212), and which is Federal Energy 

2 Regulatory Commission project number 2743. 

3 (2) UPPER HIDDEN BASIN DIVERSION EXPAN4 SION.—The term ‘‘Upper Hidden Basin Diversion 

5 Expansion’’ means the expansion of the Terror Lake 

6 Hydroelectric Project as generally described in Ex7 hibit E to the Upper Hidden Basin Grant Applica8 tion dated July 2, 2014, and submitted to the Alas9 ka Energy Authority Renewable Energy Fund 

10 Round VIII by Kodiak Electric Association, Inc. 

11 (b) AUTHORIZATION.—The licensee for the Terror 

12 Lake Hydroelectric Project may occupy not more than 20 

13 acres of Federal land to construct, operate, and maintain 

14 the Upper Hidden Basin Diversion Expansion without fur15 ther authorization of the Secretary of the Interior or 

16 under the Alaska National Interest Lands Conservation 

17 Act (16 U.S.C. 3101 et seq.). 

18 (c) SAVINGS CLAUSE.—The Upper Hidden Basin Di19 version Expansion shall be subject to appropriate terms 

20 and conditions included in an amendment to a license 

21 issued by the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission pur22 suant to the Federal Power Act (16 U.S.C. 791a et seq.), 

23 including section 4(e) of that Act (16 U.S.C. 797(e)), fol24 lowing an environmental review by the Commission under 


SSpencer on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
3 

•HR 4193 IH

1 the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (42 U.S.C. 

2 4321 et seq.). 

Æ 


SSpencer on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
### SUBCHAPTER IV—NONPROLIFERATION AND DISARMAMENT PROGRAMS AND ACTIVITIES
#### § 234.10 General.

A lump-sum death payment (LSDP) is payable when an employee with ten or more years of railroad service and a current connection with the railroad industry dies and is not survived by an individual who is eligible for a monthly annuity in the month the employee died. The amount of the LSDP and the priority for payment depend upon when the employee acquired his or her 120th month of railroad service. If the employee acquired the 120th month of railroad service after 1974, a 1974 Act lump-sum death payment is payable to the employee's widow(er). If the employee acquired the 120th month of railroad service before 1975, a 1937 Act lump-sum death payment is payable to the employee's widow(er), the funeral home or the payer of the employee's burial expenses. An application for an LSDP must be filed within two years after the employee's death.

(Approved by the Office of Management and Budget under control number 3220-0031)

[51 FR 3036, Jan. 23, 1986, as amended at 52 FR 11017, Apr. 6, 1987]
CERTIFICATIONS



I, Jim Mackay, certify that:



1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of Sure Trace Security Corp.;



2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly report;



3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report;



4. The registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and we have:



a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this quarterly report is being prepared;



b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of this quarterly report (the "Evaluation Date"); and



c) presented in this quarterly report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures based on our evaluation as of the Evaluation Date;



5. The registrant's other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):



a) all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal controls which could adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial data and have identified for the registrant's auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and



b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal controls; and



6. The registrant's other certifying officer and I have indicated in this quarterly report whether or not there were significant changes in internal controls or in other factors that could significantly affect internal controls subsequent to the date of our most recent evaluation, including any corrective actions with regard to significant deficiencies and material weaknesses.



Date: December 22, 2004

/s/ Jim Mackay

Jim Mackay

Chief Executive Officer
### §216. Repealed. Pub. L. 106–113, div. B, §1000(a)(7) [div. A, title II, §233(b)], Nov. 29, 1999, 113 Stat. 1536, 1501A–426

Section, act June 4, 1920, ch. 223, §4, 41 Stat. 751, authorized return of fees on refusal to visé.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date of Repeal

For effective date of repeal, see section 1000(a)(7) [div. A, title II, §233(c)] of Pub. L. 106–113, set out as an Effective Date of 1999 Amendment note under section 214 of this title.
Editorial Note on Part 416
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 416 appear at 68 FR 53509, Sept. 11, 2003.

§ 416.1424 When the expedited appeals process may be used. You may use the expedited appeals process if all of the following requirements are met: ( a ) We have made an initial and a reconsidered determination; an administrative law judge has made a hearing decision; or Appeals Council review has been requested, but a final decision has not been issued.
( b ) You are a party to the reconsidered determination or the hearing decision.
( c ) You have submitted a written request for the expedited appeals process.
( d ) You have claimed, and we agree, that the only factor preventing a favorable determination or decision is a provision in the law that you believe is unconstitutional.
( e ) If you are not the only party, all parties to the determination or decision agree to request the expedited appeals process.
**Exhibit23.2**

**CONSENTTO INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**

We consent to theincorporation by reference of our report dated March 9, 2006, except for thethird paragraph of Note C, as to which the date is January 4, 2007, in Post-EffectiveAmendment No.1 on Form S-3 to Form S-1 Registration Statement (No. 333-124601)and related Prospectus of KapStone Paper and Packaging Corporation (formerlyStone Arcade Acquisition Corporation) on our audit of the financial statementsas of December 31, 2005 and for the period from April 15, 2005 (date ofinception) through December 31, 2005, which are included in the Annual Reportin Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2006. We also consent to thereference to us as “Experts” in the Registration Statement.

/s/ Eisner LLP

New York, New YorkMarch 15, 2007

----
Editorial Note on Part 416
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 416 appear at 68 FR 53509, Sept. 11, 2003.

§ 416.2111 Conditions for our agreeing to make Medicaid eligibility determinations. We will agree to make Medicaid eligibility determinations for a State only if the State's Medicaid eligibility requirements for recipients of SSI benefits and for recipients of State supplementary payments are the same as the requirements for receiving SSI benefits and the requirements for receiving State supplementary payments, respectively. Exceptions: We may agree to make Medicaid eligibility determinations— ( a ) For one, two, or all of the three categories of people (*i.e.*, aged, blind, and disabled) who receive SSI benefits or State supplementary payments; or
( b ) Even though the State's Medicaid eligibility requirements for recipients of SSI benefits or of State supplementary payments, or both, differ from the requirements for SSI or State supplementary payments, or both, in ways mandated by Federal law.
§ 404.914 Disability hearing—general. ( a ) *Availability.* We will provide you with an opportunity for a disability hearing if: ( 1 ) You have been receiving benefits based on a medical impairment that renders you disabled;
( 2 ) We have made an initial or revised determination based on medical factors that you are not now disabled because your impairment: ( i ) Has ceased;
( ii ) Did not exist; or
( iii ) Is no longer disabling; and
( 3 ) You make a timely request for reconsideration of the initial or revised determination.
( b ) *Scope.* The disability hearing will address only the initial or revised determination, based on medical factors, that you are not now disabled. Any other issues which arise in connection with your request for reconsideration will be reviewed in accordance with the reconsideration procedures described in § 404.913(a).
( c ) *Time and place* — ( 1 ) *General.* Either the State agency or the Associate Commissioner for Disability Determinations or his or her delegate, as appropriate, will set the time and place of your disability hearing. We will send you a notice of the time and place of your disability hearing at least 20 days before the date of the hearing. You may be expected to travel to your disability hearing. (See §§ 404.999a-404.999d regarding reimbursement for travel expenses.)
( 2 ) *Change of time or place.* If you are unable to travel or have some other reason why you cannot attend your disability hearing at the scheduled time or place, you should request at the earliest possible date that the time or place of your hearing be changed. We will change the time or place if there is good cause for doing so under the standards in § 404.936 (c) and (d).
( d ) *Combined issues.* If a disability hearing is available to you under paragraph (a) of this section, and you file a new application for benefits while your request for reconsideration is still pending, we may combine the issues on both claims for the purpose of the disability hearing and issue a combined initial/reconsidered determination which is binding with respect to the common issues on both claims.
( e ) *Definition.* For purposes of the provisions regarding disability hearings (§§ 404.914 through 404.918) *we, us* or *our* means the Social Security Administration or the State agency.
[51 FR 300, Jan. 3, 1986, as amended at 51 FR 8808, Mar. 14, 1986; 71 FR 10427, Mar. 1, 2006]
Exhibit 99.2
 
 James Hardie Industries SELevel 322 Pitt StreetSydney NSW 2000 Australia30 June 2011Tel: 02 8274 5239Fax: 02 8274 5218The ManagerCompany Announcements Office
    
    GPO Box 3935ASX
    
    Sydney NSW 2001 Australia20 Bridge StreetSYDNEY NSW 2000Dear Sir/Madam
 2011 annual report on form 20-F filed with SEC
2011 Australian annual report filed with ASX
2011 Irish statutory accounts to be filed with Irish CRO
  
    
    annual report on form 20-F filed with the United States Securities and Exchange
Commission (SEC);
    
    Australian annual report; and
    
    for the first time, its Irish statutory accounts, which will be filed with the Irish
Companies Registration Office (CRO) later today.
   Yours faithfully(-s-sean osullivan)Sean OSullivanVice President  Investor and Media Relations Directors:   Chief Executive Officer:  Company number
#### William P. Brown and Others, Appellants, v. William C. Walter, Respondent.

Judgment affirmed, with costs. All concurred.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY HIGH

 86

 74

 75

 71

 75

 72

 75

 80

 90

 91

 86

 77

 71

 70

 73

 0

 0

 73

 71

 76

 86

 76

 74

 76

 85

 85

 83

 74

 75

 82

 90

 67

 68

 68

 68

 67

 67

 67

 68

 69

 68

 63

 65

 65

 64

 67

 0

 0

 65

 64

 64

 68

 67

 66

 67

 68

 68

 69

 71

 72

 73

 76

 76

 71

 70

 69

 71

 69

 70

 72

 74

 78

 73

 71

 67

 67

 71

 0

 0

 68

 67

 69

 75

 71

 69

 71

 72

 75

 73

 73

 73

 76

 81

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

AUGUST 2016 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: September 15, 2016

HIGH LOW MEAN

 77.9

 78.2

 79.2

 78.4

 77.6

 77.6

 77.7

 78.0

 78.0

 78.2

 78.5

 78.5

 79.6

 80.3

 79.5

 0.0

 0.0

 78.9

 78.5

 78.4

 78.5

 76.6

 77.7

 78.0

 77.6

 76.8

 77.1

 77.3

 77.4

 78.5

 79.3

 72.6

 72.5

 73.1

 72.7

 71.6

 71.5

 71.2

 71.8

 71.9

 72.7

 72.9

 72.9

 73.3

 74.1

 74.2

 0.0

 0.0

 74.0

 73.1

 73.0

 72.7

 72.1

 71.3

 71.5

 71.3

 71.5

 70.4

 70.2

 70.6

 70.8

 72.3

 75.3

 75.3

 76.0

 75.4

 74.6

 74.5

 74.3

 74.7

 74.8

 75.2

 75.6

 75.5

 76.3

 77.0

 76.7

 0.0

 0.0

 76.4

 75.7

 75.6

 75.5

 74.4

 74.4

 74.6

 74.4

 74.0

 73.7

 73.8

 74.1

 74.7

 75.7

HIGH LOW MEAN

 8.5

 8.4

 8.4

 8.4

 8.5

 8.5

 8.5

 8.4

 8.4

 8.4

 8.4

 8.4

 8.3

 8.2

 8.2

 0.0

 0.0

 8.4

 8.5

 8.5

 8.5

 8.6

 8.6

 8.6

 8.6

 8.7

 8.7

 8.8

 8.7

 8.6

 0.0

 7.6

 7.5

 7.5

 7.4

 7.6

 7.6

 7.6

 7.6

 7.6

 7.6

 7.5

 7.6

 7.5

 7.4

 7.4

 0.0

 0.0

 7.5

 7.6

 7.6

 7.6

 7.6

 7.7

 7.7

 7.7

 7.7

 7.7

 7.7

 7.7

 7.5

 0.0

 7.9

 7.9

 7.8

 7.8

 7.9

 7.9

 8.0

 7.9

 7.9

 7.9

 7.9

 7.9

 7.8

 7.7

 7.7

 0.0

 0.0

 7.9

 8.0

 8.0

 7.9

 8.0

 8.0

 8.0

 8.0

 8.1

 8.1

 8.1

 8.1

 8.0

 0.0

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

RIPON ON THE STANISLAUS RIVER

 ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS WATER TEMPERATURE, DEG DISSOLVED OXYZEN, PPM
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY HIGH

 787

 776

 737

 771

 779

 613

 781

 748

 736

 755

 696

 707

 716

 709

 739

 842

 786

 743

 773

 866

 857

 814

 708

 668

 642

 637

 666

 662

 732

 570

 659

 513

 490

 485

 493

 504

 515

 518

 532

 531

 536

 527

 555

 558

 567

 587

 602

 615

 600

 685

 684

 670

 656

 627

 605

 597

 517

 541

 507

 434

 417

 410

 587

 584

 570

 565

 572

 554

 595

 618

 615

 640

 621

 638

 639

 649

 657

 691

 695

 696

 718

 754

 734

 698

 663

 642

 614

 581

 584

 565

 512

 464

 512

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

DECEMBER 2016 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: January 5, 2017

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

DELTA MENDOTA CANAL AT CHECK 13 (O'NEILL)
[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 12 (Wednesday, January 19, 2011)]
[Notices]
[Page 3097]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2011-961]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE

Office of the Secretary


U.S. Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces Code Committee Meeting

AGENCY: DoD.

ACTION: Notice of Public Meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This notice announces the forthcoming public meeting of the 
Code Committee established by Article 146(a), Uniform Code of Military 
Justice, 10 U.S.C. 946(a), to be held at the Courthouse of the United 
States Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces, 450 E Street, NW., 
Washington, DC 20442-0001, at 11 a.m. on Tuesday, March 1, 2011. The 
agenda for this meeting will include consideration of proposed changes 
to the Uniform Code of Military Justice and the Manual for Courts-
Martial, United States, and other matters relating to the operation of 
the Uniform Code of Military Justice throughout the Armed Forces.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: William A. DeCicco, Clerk of Court, 
United States Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces, 450 E Street, 
Northwest, Washington, DC 20442-0001, telephone (202) 761-1448.

    Dated: January 11, 2011.
Morgan F. Park,
Alternate OSD Federal Register Liaison Officer, Department of Defense.
[FR Doc. 2011-961 Filed 1-18-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 5001-06-P
#### Knomark Manufacturing Co., Inc., Respondent, v. Manhattan Dial Manufacturing Co., Inc., Appellant.

Action to recover for damage to merchandise, caused by reason of alleged negligence of defendant in failing to repair a roof. Order granting new trial and vacating order dismissing complaint, which latter order was made in accordance with granting of motion *783at the close of plaintiffs case, and *vacating*the judgment entered in accordance therewith, unanimously affirmed, with costs to abide the event. No opinion. Present — Hagarty, Acting P. J., Carswell, Johnston, Adel and Sneed, JJ.
```

[Congressional Bills 114th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 4197 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

114th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 4197

To amend the Immigration and Nationality Act to permit the Governor of 
 a State to reject the resettlement of a refugee in that State unless 
there is adequate assurance that the alien does not present a security 
                      risk and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            December 9, 2015

Mr. Poe of Texas (for himself, Mr. Farenthold, Mr. Babin, Mr. Weber of 
Texas, Mr. Barton, Mr. Olson, Mr. Sessions, Mr. Rogers of Alabama, Mr. 
Salmon, Mr. Loudermilk, Mr. Zinke, Mr. Abraham, Mr. Smith of Texas, Mr. 
 Bridenstine, Mr. Neugebauer, Mr. Pittenger, Mr. Jones, Mr. Gowdy, Mr. 
King of Iowa, Mr. Blum, Mr. Burgess, Mr. Collins of Georgia, Mr. Duncan 
  of South Carolina, Mr. Culberson, Mr. Jody B. Hice of Georgia, Mr. 
 Posey, Mr. Harris, Mr. Conaway, Mr. Palmer, Mr. Carter of Texas, and 
 Mr. Flores) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                       Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To amend the Immigration and Nationality Act to permit the Governor of 
 a State to reject the resettlement of a refugee in that State unless 
there is adequate assurance that the alien does not present a security 
                      risk and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``State Refugee Security Act of 
2015''.

SEC. 2. AUTHORITY OF STATES TO REJECT RESETTLEMENT OF REFUGEES.

    Section 207 of the Immigration and Nationality Act (8 U.S.C. 1157) 
is amended by adding at the end the following:
    ``(g) Notice of Refugee Resettlement.--The Office of Refugee 
Resettlement shall notify the State agency responsible for coordinating 
the placement or resettlement of an alien eligible to be admitted to 
the United States under this section not later than 21 days before the 
arrival of such alien in the State.
    ``(h) State Rejection of Refugee Resettlement.--Notwithstanding any 
other provision of law, no alien eligible to be admitted to the United 
States under this section shall be placed or resettled in a State if 
the Governor of that State certifies to the Director of the Office of 
Refugee Resettlement that the Director has failed, in the sole 
determination of the Governor, to provide adequate assurance that the 
alien does not present a security risk to the State.''.
                                 <all>
```
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY HIGH

 17,998

 15,769

 20,408

 20,307

 18,467

 15,498

 14,511

 12,982

 13,260

 12,188

 11,895

 12,041

 12,185

 13,643

 12,637

 14,303

 13,823

 14,819

 14,658

 13,771

 12,608

 11,586

 11,394

 12,440

 10,862

 13,290

 13,098

 12,632

 12,360

 13,767

 12,328

 9,988

 9,257

 11,568

 12,437

 10,096

 8,116

 9,421

 8,604

 7,806

 7,738

 7,529

 7,646

 8,430

 7,330

 8,527

 8,792

 8,665

 8,957

 9,221

 8,606

 7,805

 7,214

 7,720

 7,024

 7,578

 6,877

 9,400

 8,117

 8,166

 7,855

 8,174

 13,873

 12,718

 15,344

 16,225

 14,314

 12,152

 11,739

 10,887

 10,881

 10,085

 9,619

 9,608

 10,372

 10,548

 10,721

 10,782

 10,609

 11,335

 11,698

 11,088

 10,145

 9,679

 9,650

 9,744

 9,463

 10,212

 11,569

 10,912

 10,300

 10,843

 10,635

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

OCTOBER 2008 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: November 4, 2008

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

PORT CHICAGO TOP IN SUISUN BAY
#### In the Matter of L. Victor Weil, Appellant, against Spencer E. Bates et al., Constituting the Tax Commission of the State of New York, Respondents. In the Matter of Benjamin J. Weil, Appellant, against Spencer E. Bates et al., Constituting the Tax Commission of the State of New York, Respondents.

— This is a review Trader article 78 of the Civil Practice Act of final determinations of the respondents made on September 4, 1946, affirming taxes and penalties assessed against the appellant L. Victor Weil for the calendar years 1937, 1940 and 1941, and against the appellant Benjamin J. Weil for the calendar years 1940 and 1941. With respect to the appellant L. Victor Weil the question is whether a deduction claimed in 1937, of $56,650.28 as a bad debt should be allowed or whether the debt was actually sustained in the year 1932. The commission decided that the deduction should be disallowed. The proof shows that no actual loss was sustained. The second question is whether or not the partnership of B. J. & L. V. Weil was engaged in the business of buying, selling and operating real property in the years 1940 and 1941. The commission determined that the operations of the partnership constituted the carrying on of a business within the meaning of article 16 of the Tax Law and that the profits realized were subject to the minimum normal and emergency taxes. The appellants contend that the profit realized by them was subject to the net capital gain tax on the ground that they were not carrying on a business. The evidence sustains the determination of the commission. Determination confirmed, with $50 costs and disbursements. Heffernan, Foster and Russell, JJ., concur; Hill, P. J., dissents; Brewster, J., dissents and votes to annul the determination and to remit to the Tax Commission the Matter of the Application of L. Victor Weil and concurs in the decision for confirmation in the Matter of the Application of Benjamin J. Weil.