alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
_________________________________________ 

 

 

Order Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan 

December 30, 2008 Clifford W. Taylor,

 Chief Justice 

137193 Michael F. Cavanagh 

Elizabeth A. Weaver 

Marilyn Kelly 

Maura D. Corrigan 

Robert P. Young, Jr. 

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Stephen J. Markman, 

Plaintiff-Appellee, Justices 

v SC: 137193 

 COA: 276092 

Macomb CC: 2006-004182-FC 

ANTONIO DEMETRIUS ROBERTSON,

Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/ 

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the July 17, 2008 

judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not 

persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court. 

1215 

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

December 30, 2008 

 Clerk
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

 No. 07-1673 

MIREILLE ESSONG ENGOULOU,

Petitioner,

v.

MICHAEL B. MUKASEY, Attorney General,

Respondent.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration

Appeals. (A98-317-657)

Submitted: March 12, 2008 Decided: April 4, 2008

Before WILKINSON, MICHAEL, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.

Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Ronald D. Richey, LAW OFFICES OF RONALD D. RICHEY, Rockville,

Maryland, for Petitioner. Jeffrey S. Bucholtz, Assistant Attorney

General, James A. Hunolt, Senior Litigation Counsel, David Schor,

Trial Attorney, Office of Immigration Litigation, UNITED STATES

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Washington, D.C., for Respondent.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. 
- 2 -

PER CURIAM:

Mireille Essong Engoulou, a native and citizen of

Cameroon, petitions for review of an order of the Board of

Immigration Appeals (“Board”) denying her motion to reconsider a

prior order of the Board denying a motion to reopen removal

proceedings. We have reviewed the administrative record and find

no abuse of discretion in the Board’s order. See 8 C.F.R.

§ 1003.2(a) (2007) (standard of review); Jean v. Gonzales, 435 F.3d

475, 481, 482-83 (4th Cir. 2006) (same). We therefore deny the

petition for review for the reasons stated by the Board. See In

Re: Essong Engoulou, No. A98-317-657 (B.I.A. June 18, 2007). We

dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions

are adequately presented in the materials before the court and

argument would not aid the decisional process.

PETITION DENIED
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY HIGH

 90

 102

 92

 90

 89

 84

 76

 69

 62

 67

 73

 74

 70

 71

 57

 57

 58

 59

 58

 60

 61

 66

 71

 70

 67

 72

 63

 66

 72

 79

 81

 87

 88

 87

 82

 80

 74

 66

 60

 57

 56

 65

 60

 61

 56

 55

 55

 56

 56

 56

 57

 59

 60

 63

 58

 57

 60

 60

 63

 65

 70

 77

 88

 92

 90

 89

 83

 78

 70

 63

 59

 61

 69

 68

 68

 60

 56

 56

 57

 57

 57

 58

 60

 63

 67

 62

 59

 63

 61

 65

 69

 74

 78

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

OCTOBER 2012 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: February 7, 2013

HIGH LOW MEAN

 70.0

 70.1

 70.1

 69.2

 67.5

 66.3

 65.2

 64.4

 63.2

 62.0

 61.0

 59.6

 60.6

 60.1

 59.9

 60.6

 60.6

 60.1

 62.0

 60.8

 59.5

 58.6

 59.1

 58.0

 58.5

 58.1

 58.1

 59.1

 59.8

 60.6

 60.7

 66.5

 66.5

 66.5

 66.0

 64.9

 63.8

 62.8

 61.8

 60.9

 59.7

 59.6

 58.7

 58.0

 58.2

 58.3

 58.9

 59.5

 58.6

 59.5

 59.6

 58.0

 57.8

 57.2

 56.7

 56.7

 57.0

 56.3

 56.9

 57.7

 58.3

 58.9

 68.5

 68.4

 68.3

 67.6

 66.5

 65.3

 64.1

 63.2

 62.3

 61.0

 60.0

 59.2

 59.4

 59.4

 59.1

 59.7

 60.0

 59.4

 60.3

 60.2

 58.7

 58.2

 58.1

 57.2

 57.5

 57.6

 57.2

 58.0

 58.7

 59.4

 59.8

HIGH LOW MEAN

 8.7

 8.7

 8.7

 9.5

 9.6

 9.7

 9.8

 9.9

 9.9

 9.9

 9.9

 10.0

 9.3

 9.3

 9.3

 9.2

 9.0

 9.1

 9.1

 9.0

 9.0

 9.1

 8.8

 9.4

 9.5

 9.4

 9.4

 9.2

 9.0

 8.8

 8.8

 8.0

 8.0

 8.0

 8.0

 8.9

 9.0

 9.2

 9.4

 9.5

 9.7

 9.8

 9.0

 9.0

 9.0

 9.0

 8.9

 8.9

 9.0

 8.9

 8.9

 8.9

 8.9

 8.7

 8.7

 9.2

 9.3

 9.2

 9.0

 8.8

 8.5

 8.5

 8.3

 8.2

 8.2

 8.7

 9.2

 9.3

 9.5

 9.6

 9.7

 9.8

 9.9

 9.5

 9.1

 9.2

 9.1

 9.1

 9.0

 9.1

 9.0

 9.0

 9.0

 9.0

 8.8

 9.2

 9.4

 9.3

 9.3

 9.1

 8.9

 8.7

 8.6

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

RIPON ON THE STANISLAUS RIVER

 ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS WATER TEMPERATURE, DEG DISSOLVED OXYZEN, PPM
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY HIGH

 125

 133

 151

 157

 149

 114

 105

 145

 122

 119

 157

 130

 161

 172

 134

 133

 142

 136

 135

 123

 100

 94

 107

 117

 143

 184

 172

 158

 175

 142

 128

 97

 97

 97

 99

 97

 98

 99

 104

 110

 111

 120

 124

 122

 119

 121

 118

 118

 125

 112

 102

 87

 86

 91

 107

 100

 120

 135

 129

 124

 107

 110

 103

 100

 104

 106

 115

 102

 101

 114

 115

 114

 130

 128

 131

 130

 128

 123

 127

 132

 119

 114

 93

 88

 99

 111

 116

 133

 144

 143

 136

 125

 120

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

DECEMBER 2010 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: January 6, 2011

HIGH LOW MEAN

 49.2

 49.4

 50.5

 53.1

 56.1

 56.0

 54.9

 54.9

 55.7

 56.6

 57.1

 57.2

 56.9

 57.0

 56.9

 54.2

 54.7

 59.5

 60.2

 58.5

 53.3

 54.0

 54.1

 53.4

 53.4

 52.9

 52.4

 52.3

 52.1

 50.7

 50.1

 46.7

 47.3

 49.0

 50.2

 52.5

 54.1

 53.1

 53.2

 53.9

 54.6

 56.0

 56.5

 56.4

 55.9

 54.6

 52.2

 53.0

 53.8

 56.6

 53.3

 52.7

 52.8

 53.4

 52.6

 52.7

 51.5

 51.4

 51.2

 50.8

 49.3

 49.3

 48.0

 48.2

 49.8

 51.3

 54.1

 55.0

 54.1

 53.7

 54.7

 55.5

 56.5

 56.8

 56.7

 56.2

 55.6

 53.1

 53.7

 56.0

 59.2

 55.5

 52.9

 53.4

 53.7

 53.0

 52.9

 52.3

 51.9

 51.7

 51.6

 49.8

 49.8

HIGH LOW MEAN

 11.6

 11.5

 10.2

 10.1

 9.7

 9.5

 9.6

 9.5

 9.5

 9.5

 9.2

 9.1

 8.9

 9.0

 8.7

 9.2

 9.0

 8.6

 7.9

 9.0

 9.3

 9.3

 9.1

 8.7

 9.2

 9.1

 9.3

 9.0

 9.4

 9.5

 9.7

 11.2

 10.2

 10.0

 9.5

 8.8

 8.7

 9.2

 9.1

 9.1

 9.1

 8.9

 8.8

 8.7

 8.1

 8.1

 8.6

 8.5

 7.2

 7.3

 7.3

 9.0

 9.1

 8.6

 8.3

 8.3

 8.7

 8.8

 8.7

 9.0

 9.2

 9.5

 11.4

 11.0

 10.1

 9.9

 9.4

 9.1

 9.4

 9.4

 9.2

 9.3

 9.0

 8.9

 8.8

 8.7

 8.4

 9.0

 8.8

 8.3

 7.7

 8.3

 9.2

 9.2

 9.0

 8.6

 8.6

 8.9

 9.1

 8.8

 9.2

 9.3

 9.6

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

RIPON ON THE STANISLAUS RIVER

 ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS WATER TEMPERATURE, DEG DISSOLVED OXYZEN, PPM
**EXHIBIT 31.2****CERTIFICATION**I, Richard Peterson, certify that:     1. I have reviewed this report on Form 10-KSB of Advanced BioEnergy, LLC;     2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material factor omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of thecircumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this report;     3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information includedin this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results ofoperations and cash flows of the small business issuer as of, and for, the periods presented inthis report;     4. The small business issuer’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishingand maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a–15(e) and15d–15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules13a–15(f) and 15d–15(f)) for the small business issuer and have:          (a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls andprocedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating tothe small business issuer, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by otherswithin those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;          (b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the small business issuer’s disclosure controls andprocedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosurecontrols and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on suchevaluation; and          (c) Disclosed in this report any change in the small business issuer’s internal control overfinancial reporting that occurred during the small business issuer’s most recent fiscal quarter(the small business issuer’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that hasmaterially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the small business issuer’sinternal control over financial reporting; and     5. The small business issuer’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on ourmost recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the small business issuer’sauditors and the audit committee of the small business issuer’s board of directors (or personsperforming the equivalent functions):          (a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation ofinternal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the smallbusiness issuer’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and          (b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have asignificant role in the small business issuer’s internal control over financial reporting.     Date:December 31, 2007 /s/ Richard Peterson                     Richard Peterson    *Chief Financial Officer and*    *Vice President of Accounting and Finance*
<PAGE>

                                                                Exhibit 23




Report of Independent Public Accounts


As independent public accountants, we hereby consent to the incorporation of
our Auditors Report included in F&M Bancorp's Form 10-K for the year ended
December 31, 1999, into F&M Bancorp's previously filed Registration
Statements on Form S-8 (File Nos. 33-39941, 002-88390, 333-93815, 333-16709,
333-68437, 333-02433, 333-76669) and Form S-3 (File No. 33-39940).

                                       /s/ Arthur Andersen LLP

Vienna Virginia
March 17, 2000
### **CHAPTER 61—ANTI-TERRORISM—PLO**

Sec.
5201.
Findings; determinations.
5202.
Prohibitions regarding PLO.
5203.
Enforcement.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<CIK> 0000732718
<NAME> U S WEST, INC.
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1997
<CASH>                                             164
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    2,059
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                        171
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 2,979
<PP&E>                                          38,152
<DEPRECIATION>                                  19,944
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  40,333
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            5,813
<BONDS>                                         14,260
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                            1,131
<PREFERRED>                                        921
<COMMON>                                        10,739
<OTHER-SE>                                       (175)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    40,333
<SALES>                                          3,766
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 3,766
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 2,944
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 278
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    400
<INCOME-TAX>                                       170
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                230
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       230
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.70
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.70
        

</TABLE>
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY ELEV

 219.57

 219.07

 218.98

 219.40

 220.48

 221.67

 221.51

 221.72

 221.99

 222.38

 223.15

 223.86

 223.35

 223.57

 223.12

 222.60

 222.62

 222.11

 221.75

 220.83

 220.30

 219.85

 219.90

 219.91

 219.03

 220.17

 220.54

 219.76

 219.26

 218.56

 218.79

 42,042

 40,762

 40,533

 41,605

 44,400

 47,519

 47,099

 47,651

 48,360

 49,394

 51,447

 53,350

 51,982

 52,571

 51,367

 49,980

 50,033

 48,677

 47,730

 45,315

 43,931

 42,764

 42,893

 42,919

 40,660

 43,593

 44,557

 42,531

 41,247

 39,473

 40,052

STORAGE

-1,655

-1,280

-229

+1,072

+2,795

+3,119

-420

+552

+709

+1,034

+2,053

+1,903

-1,368

+589

-1,204

-1,387

+53

-1,356

-947

-2,415

-1,384

-1,167

+129

+26

-2,259

+2,933

+964

-2,026

-1,284

-1,774

+579

CHANGE

4,140

4,199

4,272

4,204

4,196

4,163

4,128

4,169

4,125

4,147

4,122

4,092

4,082

4,087

4,087

4,122

4,143

4,125

4,098

4,132

3,725

3,262

4,047

4,093

3,423

4,116

4,081

2,907

3,488

4,018

4,096

PUMPING

 3,719

 3,011

 3,336

 2,978

 2,747

 3,020

 4,209

 4,044

 3,417

 3,214

 3,035

 4,395

 4,176

 3,110

 3,841

 4,233

 3,835

 4,448

 5,173

 4,589

 4,775

 4,764

 4,809

 4,882

 5,044

 4,859

 4,500

 5,009

 5,132

 5,074

 5,392

PUMPING

 8,433

 8,292

 7,159

 6,701

 8,220

 8,220

 8,176

 8,097

 8,070

 8,020

 7,972

 6,623

 7,893

 7,792

 7,740

 7,541

 7,361

 7,182

 6,941

 6,709

 6,426

 6,267

 6,091

 5,223

 4,499

 2,363

 3,067

 4,369

 3,756

 4,565

 3,629

PUMPING

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

GEN.

*

+201

+322

+374

+286

+220

+455

-28

+234

+1

+787

+116

+432

+289

+252

+168

+39

+211

-88

+77

-369

-221

+566

+425

+386

+601

+4

+404

+654

+443

+474

+347

OR

UNITED STATES 

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION

CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT

CONSOLIDATED STATE-FEDERAL O'NEILL FOREBAY February 1, 2011

DAILY OPERATIONS

JANUARY 2011 RUN DATE:

IN LAKE GEN.

ACRE-FEET O'NEILL

RELEASE - C.F.S. 

TOTALS -3,645 124,089 0 203,397 128,770 +8,062

ACRE-FEET -3,645 246,131 0 403,438 255,415

SUMMARY

 0

RELEASE (ACRE-FEET)

O'NEILL GEN. 0

SAN LUIS PUMP 403,438 0

 43,697

DOS AMIGOS PUMP 255,415

DELIVERIES 

S. LUIS O'NEILL

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

CALIF. DOS AMIGOS

AQUEDUCT

6,977

6,138

5,734

5,730

7,960

8,194

8,074

8,017

7,720

6,821

7,804

7,454

7,009

6,861

6,719

6,915

6,868

6,909

7,462

6,318

7,000

6,615

6,493

5,638

4,380

4,582

3,568

4,796

4,311

4,253

4,871

 198,191

 393,112

S. LUIS

DELIV.

GAINS(+)

LOSS(-)

C.F.S.

INFLOW - C.F.S

STATE OF CALIFORNIA

THE RESOURCES AGENCY

DEPARTMENT OF WATER RESOURCES

STATE WATER PROJECT

TOTAL 658,853

 15,991

* DAILY DEL. FIGURES UNAVAILABLE. TOT. DEL. IS INCLUDED IN COMPUTING MONTHLY TOTALS
### §1964. Report to Congress

The President shall whenever appropriate report to the Congress his action hereunder.

(Pub. L. 85–7, §5, Mar. 9, 1957, 71 Stat. 6; Pub. L. 87–195, pt. IV, §705, Sept. 4, 1961, 75 Stat. 463.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

1961—Pub. L. 87–195 substituted "whenever appropriate" for "within the months of January and July of each year".

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Repeals

Section 705 of Pub. L. 87–195, cited as a credit to this section, was repealed by section 401 of Pub. L. 87–565, pt. IV, Aug. 1, 1962, 76 Stat. 263, except insofar as section 705 affected this section.
###### Editorial Note on Part 416

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 416 appear at 68 FR 53509, Sept. 11, 2003.

#### § 416.1461 Prehearing and posthearing conferences.

The administrative law judge may decide on his or her own, or at the request of any party to the hearing, to hold a prehearing or posthearing conference to facilitate the hearing or the hearing decision. The administrative law judge shall tell the parties of the time, place and purpose of the conference at least seven days before the conference date, unless the parties have indicated in writing that they do not wish to receive a written notice of the conference. At the conference, the administrative law judge may consider matters in addition to those stated in the notice, if the parties consent in writing. A record of the conference will be made. The administrative law judge shall issue an order stating all agreements and actions resulting from the conference. If the parties do not object, the agreements and actions become part of the hearing record and are binding on all parties.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY HIGH

 911

 895

 904

 903

 908

 918

 912

 825

 923

 921

 932

 937

 953

 964

 942

 919

 972

 835

 920

 842

 739

 758

 759

 750

 727

 746

 762

 748

 773

 778

 780

 430

 440

 443

 438

 434

 434

 436

 447

 477

 474

 462

 522

 524

 538

 520

 516

 542

 477

 528

 476

 490

 434

 507

 531

 520

 504

 491

 462

 489

 472

 471

 582

 592

 579

 570

 564

 606

 583

 514

 605

 609

 640

 676

 680

 736

 689

 598

 745

 576

 698

 643

 589

 582

 595

 614

 592

 592

 601

 580

 589

 618

 600

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

DECEMBER 2002 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: January 16, 2003

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

DELTA MENDOTA CANAL AT CHECK 13 (O'NEILL)
Exhibit 99.1
 For further information contact:
 Michael R. Garone, Interim CEO and CFO
973-532-8005 or mgarone@emisphere.com
 EMISPHERE TECHNOLOGIES ANNOUNCES AGREEMENTS TO RAISE $7.5 MILLION
IN PRIVATE PLACEMENT TRANSACTIONS
 CEDAR
KNOLLS, NJ, June 30, 2011




---



##### 



About Emisphere Technologies, Inc.
 ® ® www.emisphere.com
 Safe Harbor Statement Regarding Forward-looking Statements
 The statements in this release and oral statements made by representatives of Emisphere relating to
matters that are not historical facts (including without limitation those regarding the timing or
potential outcomes of research collaborations or clinical trials, any market that might develop for
any of Emispheres product candidates, the sufficiency of Emispheres cash and other capital
resources and its ability to obtain additional financing to meet its capital needs) are
forward-looking statements that involve risks and uncertainties, including, but not limited to, the
likelihood that future research will prove successful, the likelihood that any product in the
research pipeline will receive regulatory approval in the United States or abroad, the ability of
Emisphere and/or its partners to develop, manufacture and commercialize products using Emispheres
drug delivery technology, Emispheres ability to fund such efforts with or without partners, and
other risks and uncertainties detailed in Emispheres filings with the Securities and Exchange
Commission, including those factors discussed under the caption Risk Factors in Emispheres
Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2010 (file no. 000-17758) filed
on March 31, 2011 and Emispheres Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31,
2011, filed on May 10, 2011.
### §2378a. Depleted uranium ammunition

#### (a) Prohibition

Except as provided in subsection (b), none of the funds made available to carry out this chapter or any other Act may be made available to facilitate in any way the sale of M–833 antitank shells or any comparable antitank shells containing a depleted uranium penetrating component to any country other than—

(1) a country that is a member of the North Atlantic Treaty Organization;

(2) a country that has been designated as a major non-NATO ally (as defined in section 2403(q) of this title); or

(3) Taiwan.

#### (b) Exception

The prohibition contained in subsection (a) shall not apply with respect to the use of funds to facilitate the sale of antitank shells to a country if the President determines that to do so is in the national security interest of the United States.

(Pub. L. 87–195, pt. III, §620J, formerly §620G, as added Pub. L. 104–164, title I, §149, July 21, 1996, 110 Stat. 1436; renumbered §620J, Pub. L. 109–446, §2(b)(1), Dec. 21, 2006, 120 Stat. 3318.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

This chapter, referred to in subsec. (a), was in the original "this Act", meaning Pub. L. 87–195, Sept. 4, 1961, 75 Stat. 424, known as the Foreign Assistance Act of 1961. For complete classification of this Act to the Code, see Short Title note set out under section 2151 of this title and Tables.

#### Codification

Another section 620J of Pub. L. 87–195 was renumbered section 620m and is classified to section 2378d of this title.

#### **Executive Documents**

#### Delegation of Functions

For delegation of functions of President under this section, see Ex. Ord. No. 12163, Sept. 29, 1979, 44 F.R. 56673, as amended, set out as a note under section 2381 of this title.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY HIGH

 22,772

 22,730

 19,683

 18,366

 19,572

 21,116

 21,297

 20,871

 22,559

 23,015

 23,924

 25,455

 25,799

 25,898

 27,529

 25,736

 24,875

 23,124

 21,407

 21,720

 20,326

 21,118

 23,487

 23,933

 26,089

 26,293

 28,105

 29,018

 29,011

 27,597

 25,952

 9,579

 9,358

 8,586

 9,412

 10,432

 12,103

 11,330

 11,223

 12,477

 12,733

 12,745

 13,101

 11,852

 13,422

 12,930

 13,120

 12,455

 10,032

 11,309

 10,563

 11,377

 12,631

 12,232

 10,752

 12,402

 12,210

 12,657

 13,043

 13,384

 12,723

 12,666

 16,574

 16,273

 15,173

 14,821

 15,537

 16,311

 16,289

 15,664

 17,139

 17,443

 18,470

 19,624

 19,635

 20,086

 20,668

 19,875

 19,050

 17,983

 17,623

 16,122

 16,304

 16,831

 17,521

 17,642

 18,445

 19,044

 20,115

 20,610

 21,229

 20,655

 20,168

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

MAY 2021 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: June 1, 2021

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

PORT CHICAGO TOP IN SUISUN BAY