alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 10.36
 
 TERMS OF CONSULTING AGREEMENT FOR STEPHEN J. GATTO
 FROM 2004 THROUGH 2010
 CONSULTING TERM
  POSITION & DUTIES
  COMPENSATION, BENEFITS, AND EXPENSES
 Compensation.
 Bonus
 Tax and Financial Planning
 Automobile Allowance
 Business Expenses
[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 79 (Monday, April 25, 2011)]
[Notices]
[Page 22924]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2011-9872]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

NATIONAL AERONAUTICS AND SPACE ADMINISTRATION

[Notice (11-042)]


Re-Establishment of the National Space-Based Positioning, 
Navigation, and Timing (PNT) Advisory Board

AGENCY: National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA).

ACTION: Notice of advisory committee re-establishment.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given that in accordance with the President's 
2004 U.S. Space-Based PNT Policy established on December 8, 2004, and 
continuing and consistent Executive Branch PNT policy objectives since 
that time, it has been determined that an advisory board comprised of 
experts from outside the United States Government is necessary and in 
the public interest. Accordingly, NASA is re-establishing the National 
Space-Based PNT Advisory Board. The previous charter for the National 
Space-Based PNT Advisory Board expired on January 26, 2011.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mr. James J. Miller, Designated 
Federal Officer and Deputy Director of Policy and Strategic 
Communications, Office of Space Communications and Navigation, National 
Aeronautics and Space Administration, Washington, DC 20546, telephone 
202-358-4417, <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#a2c8c88ccfcbcecec7d0e2ccc3d1c38cc5cdd4"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="a0caca8ecdc9ccccc5d2e0cec1d3c18ec7cfd6">[email protected]</span></a>.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The National Space-Based PNT Advisory Board 
will provide advice on U.S. space-based PNT policy, planning, program 
management, and funding profiles in relation to the current state of 
national and international space-based PNT services. The National 
Space-Based PNT Advisory Board will function solely as an advisory body 
and will comply fully with the provisions of the Federal Advisory 
Committee Act (FACA). Copies of the charter will be filed with the 
General Services Administration, the appropriate Committees of the 
Congress, and with the Library of Congress.

P. Diane Rausch,
Advisory Committee Management Officer, National Aeronautics and Space 
Administration.
[FR Doc. 2011-9872 Filed 4-22-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7510-13-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
```

[Congressional Bills 114th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 3935 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

114th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 3935

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to terminate the deferral of 
           active income of controlled foreign corporations.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            November 5, 2015

    Mr. Pocan (for himself, Ms. Norton, Mr. Garamendi, Ms. Lee, Mr. 
   Ellison, and Mr. Nadler) introduced the following bill; which was 
              referred to the Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to terminate the deferral of 
           active income of controlled foreign corporations.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Putting America First Corporate Tax 
Act''.

SEC. 2. TERMINATION OF DEFERRAL OF ACTIVE INCOME OF CONTROLLED FOREIGN 
              CORPORATIONS.

    (a) In General.--Section 952 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 
is amended by adding at the end the following new subsection:
    ``(e) Special Application of Subpart.--
            ``(1) In general.--For taxable years beginning after 
        December 31, 2015, notwithstanding any other provision of this 
        subpart, the term `subpart F income' means, in the case of any 
        controlled foreign corporation, the income of such corporation 
        derived from any foreign country.
            ``(2) Applicable rules.--Rules similar to the rules under 
        the last sentence of subsection (a) and subsection (d) shall 
        apply to this subsection.''.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) shall 
apply to taxable years beginning after December 31, 2015.
                                 <all>
```
# C_2012402EN.01001601.xml

| 29.12.2012 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 402/16 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

29.12.2012

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 402/16

---

Commission notice on current State aid recovery interest rates and reference/discount rates for 27 Member States applicable as from 1 January 2013

(Published in accordance with Article 10 of Commission Regulation (EC) No 794/2004 of 21 April 2004 (OJ L 140, 30.4.2004, p. 1))

2012/C 402/06

Base rates calculated in accordance with the Communication from the Commission on the revision of the method for setting the reference and discount rates (OJ C 14, 19.1.2008, p. 6). Depending on the use of the reference rate, the appropriate margins have still to be added as defined in this Communication. For the discount rate this means that a margin of 100 basis points has to be added. The Commission Regulation (EC) No 271/2008 of 30 January 2008 amending the Implementing Regulation (EC) No 794/2004 foresees that, unless otherwise provided for in a specific decision, the recovery rate will also be calculated by adding 100 basis points to the base rate.

Modified rates are indicated in bold.

Previous table published in OJ C 365, 24.11.2012, p. 3.

| From | To | AT | BE | BG | CY | CZ | DE | DK | EE | EL | ES | FI | FR | HU | IE | IT | LT | LU | LV | MT | NL | PL | PT | RO | SE | SI | SK | UK |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 1.1.2013 | ... | 0,66 | 0,66 | 1,53 | 0,66 | 1,09 | 0,66 | 0,85 | 0,66 | 0,66 | 0,66 | 0,66 | 0,66 | 6,65 | 0,66 | 0,66 | 1,37 | 0,66 | 1,58 | 0,66 | 0,66 | 4,80 | 0,66 | 6,18 | 1,91 | 0,66 | 0,66 | 1,19 |

From

To

AT

BE

BG

CY

CZ

DE

DK

EE

EL

ES

FI

FR

HU

IE

IT

LT

LU

LV

MT

NL

PL

PT

RO

SE

SI

SK

UK

1.1.2013

...

0,66

0,66

0,66

0,66

1,53

1,53

0,66

0,66

1,09

1,09

0,66

0,66

0,85

0,85

0,66

0,66

0,66

0,66

0,66

0,66

0,66

0,66

0,66

0,66

6,65

6,65

0,66

0,66

0,66

0,66

1,37

1,37

0,66

0,66

1,58

1,58

0,66

0,66

0,66

0,66

4,80

4,80

0,66

0,66

6,18

6,18

1,91

1,91

0,66

0,66

0,66

0,66

1,19

1,19

---
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY HIGH

 13,104

 14,200

 16,899

 18,208

 19,602

 21,319

 17,968

 17,803

 15,156

 14,035

 13,661

 13,303

 13,193

 12,659

 12,243

 11,493

 10,388

 10,525

 8,818

 7,172

 5,341

 3,532

 2,512

 2,365

 2,468

 2,372

 18,231

 20,087

 19,878

 21,225

 23,132

 3,571

 4,514

 6,152

 5,081

 5,489

 6,229

 5,469

 6,589

 4,851

 5,175

 4,596

 5,520

 5,312

 4,660

 3,850

 3,393

 2,908

 2,662

 2,327

 2,797

 1,845

 1,486

 1,454

 1,503

 1,494

 1,463

 1,489

 8,554

 8,218

 8,759

 8,619

 8,015

 9,037

 10,317

 10,541

 11,541

 13,950

 11,407

 11,738

 10,099

 9,523

 9,533

 9,474

 9,106

 8,416

 7,516

 6,978

 6,320

 6,013

 5,546

 5,067

 3,867

 2,696

 2,014

 1,898

 1,873

 1,859

 8,203

 13,929

 14,063

 14,860

 15,384

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

MARCH 2013 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: May 3, 2013

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

PORT CHICAGO BOTTOM IN SUISUN BAY
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 96-1761 LEROY GREGG, Plaintiff - Appellant, and BARBARNAS M. SUMPTER; TERRI B. SUMPTER, Plaintiffs, versusENTERPRISE RENT-A-CAR; CONSTITUTION STATE SERVICE COMPANY; WILLIAM RUSSELL JENKINS, JR., Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District ofSouth Carolina, at Columbia. Dennis W. Shedd, District Judge. (CA95-2843-3-19BD) Submitted: March 27, 1997 Decided: April 2, 1997 Before RUSSELL, LUTTIG, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Leroy Gregg, Appellant Pro Se. Catharine Garbee Griffin, BAKER, BARWICK, RAVENEL & BENDER, L.L.P., Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellees.2 Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).3 PER CURIAM: Appellant appeals the district court's order entering judgment for Defendants in this personal injury action based on diversity of citizenship. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Gregg v. Enterprise Rent-A-Car , No. CA-95- 2843-3-19BD (D.S.C. May 1, 1996). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented inthe materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
EX-4.1





 Exhibit 4.1 
  






 
 ICU Medical, Inc. INCORPORATED UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE SEE REVERSE FOR FOR CERTAIN DEFINITIONS
This Certifies that CUSIP 449306 10 7 is the record holder of FULLY PAID AND NONASSESSABLE SHARES OF COMMON STOCK, PAR VALUE $.10 PER SHARE, OF ICU MEDICAL, INC. transferable on the books of the Corporation by the holder hereof in person or by duly
authorized Attorney upon surrender of this certificate properly endorsed. This certificate is not valid until countersigned by the Transfer Agent and registered by the Registrar. WITNESS the facsimile seal of the Corporation and the facsimile
signatures of its duly authorized officers. Dated COUNTERSIGNED AND REGISTERED: AMERICAN STOCK TRANSFER & TRUST COMPANY (New York, NY) TRANSFER AGENT AND REGISTRAR BY: AUTHORIZED SIGNATURE SECRETARY CHAIRMAN 












 



 
 The Corporation shall furnish without charge to each stockholder who so requests a statement of the powers, designations, preferences
and relative, participating, optional or other special rights of each class of stock of the Corporation or series thereof and the qualifications, limitations or restrictions of such preferences and/or rights. Such requests shall be made to the
Corporation’s Secretary at the principal office of the Corporation. The following abbreviations, when used in the inscription on the face of this certificate, shall be construed as though they were written out in full according to applicable
laws or regulations: TEN COM - as tenants in common TEN ENT - as tenants by the entireties JT TEN - as joint tenants with right of survivorship and not as tenants in common COM PROP - as community property UNIF GIFT MIN ACT - Custodian (Cust)
(Minor) under Uniform Gifts to Minors Act (State) UNIF TRF MIN ACT - Custodian (until age) (Cust) under Uniform Transfers (Minor) to Minors Act (State) Additional abbreviations may also be used though not in the above list. For Value Received,
hereby sell(s), assign(s) and transfer(s) unto PLEASE INSERT SOCIAL SECURITY OR OTHER IDENTIFYING NUMBER OF ASSIGNEE (PLEASE PRINT OR TYPEWRITE NAME AND ADDRESS, INCLUDING ZIP CODE, OF ASSIGNEE) shares of the capital stock represented by the within
Certificate, and do hereby irrevocably constitute and appoint attorney-in-fact to transfer the said stock on the books of the within named Corporation with full power of
substitution in the premises. Dated NOTICE: THE SIGNATURE TO THIS ASSIGNMENT MUST CORRESPOND WITH THE NAME(S) AS WRITTEN UPON THE FACE OF THE CERTIFICATE IN EVERY PARTICULAR, WITHOUT ALTERATION OR ENLARGEMENT, OR ANY CHANGE WHATEVER. Signature(s)
Guaranteed By THE SIGNATURE(S) SHOULD BE GUARANTEED BY AN ELIGIBLE GUARANTOR INSTITUTION, (BANKS, STOCKBROKERS, SAVINGS AND LOAN ASSOCIATIONS AND CREDIT UNIONS WITH MEMBERSHIP IN AN APPROVED SIGNATURE GUARANTEE MEDALLION PROGRAM), PURSUANT TO S.E.C.
RULE 17Ad-15.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

DAY HIGH

 121

 117

 103

 112

 105

 123

 120

 102

 120

 120

 120

 106

 134

 122

 131

 130

 119

 132

 136

 96

 134

 135

 119

 137

 143

 101

 101

 124

 106

 101

 87

 86

 84

 81

 78

 79

 72

 75

 74

 78

 84

 85

 85

 85

 84

 84

 84

 84

 84

 84

 86

 85

 84

 85

 86

 86

 87

 87

 88

 86

 92

 89

 88

 88

 86

 86

 84

 81

 81

 88

 87

 88

 92

 89

 88

 90

 89

 89

 91

 88

 91

 93

 88

 91

 96

 89

 92

 92

 93

 90

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

NOVEMBER 2005 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: December 6, 2005

HIGH LOW MEAN

 58.3

 58.0

 57.3

 57.7

 56.9

 57.6

 57.4

 57.3

 57.8

 57.6

 57.3

 56.4

 55.4

 56.6

 56.0

 55.8

 55.3

 55.0

 54.9

 53.7

 53.2

 53.4

 53.2

 52.8

 54.7

 53.5

 51.3

 51.0

 52.2

 53.2

 55.6

 56.7

 55.1

 56.0

 54.8

 54.9

 56.2

 56.3

 55.6

 55.6

 54.4

 54.9

 53.6

 53.8

 54.2

 53.5

 52.9

 52.5

 52.1

 51.6

 51.1

 51.0

 50.6

 51.0

 52.7

 51.4

 49.7

 48.6

 50.2

 51.6

 57.0

 57.3

 56.3

 56.9

 56.1

 56.2

 56.8

 56.8

 56.8

 56.6

 55.8

 55.6

 54.7

 55.1

 55.2

 54.6

 54.2

 53.8

 53.4

 52.8

 52.4

 52.1

 51.8

 52.1

 53.6

 52.5

 50.5

 49.4

 51.1

 52.4

HIGH LOW MEAN

 8.9

 8.8

 8.8

 8.6

 8.4

 8.2

 8.4

 8.3

 8.7

 8.5

 8.3

 8.3

 8.4

 8.3

 8.2

 9.1

 9.0

 9.0

 9.0

 8.9

 8.9

 8.9

 8.9

 8.8

 8.6

 8.6

 8.8

 8.8

 8.6

 8.7

 7.2

 8.6

 8.6

 8.3

 8.0

 8.0

 8.1

 8.1

 8.2

 8.2

 8.1

 8.1

 8.1

 8.0

 7.9

 8.0

 8.8

 8.8

 8.8

 8.7

 8.7

 8.7

 8.6

 8.6

 8.4

 8.4

 8.4

 8.4

 8.3

 8.2

 8.0

 8.7

 8.7

 8.5

 8.3

 8.1

 8.2

 8.2

 8.5

 8.4

 8.2

 8.2

 8.2

 8.2

 8.1

 8.4

 8.9

 8.9

 8.8

 8.8

 8.8

 8.8

 8.7

 8.7

 8.5

 8.5

 8.6

 8.6

 8.4

 8.4

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

RIPON ON THE STANISLAUS RIVER

 ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS WATER TEMPERATURE, DEG DISSOLVED OXYZEN, PPM
1994 Decisions

Opinions of the United

States Court of Appeals

for the Third Circuit

8-24-1994

United States of America v. Daddona

Precedential or Non-Precedential:

Docket 93-7338

Follow this and additional works at: http://digitalcommons.law.villanova.edu/thirdcircuit_1994

This decision is brought to you for free and open access by the Opinions of the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit at Villanova

University School of Law Digital Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in 1994 Decisions by an authorized administrator of Villanova

University School of Law Digital Repository. For more information, please contact Benjamin.Carlson@law.villanova.edu.

Recommended Citation

"United States of America v. Daddona" (1994). 1994 Decisions. Paper 122.

http://digitalcommons.law.villanova.edu/thirdcircuit_1994/122
 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS 

 FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT 

 

 Nos. 93-7338, 93-7351, 93-7682/83 and 93-7725 

 

 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA 

v. 

 JOHN L. "JACK" DADDONA, 

 Appellant in Nos. 93-7338, 

 93-7683 and 93-7725 

 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA 

v. 

 SIDNEY COHEN, 

 Appellant in Nos. 93-7351 and 

 93-7682 

Present: Becker and Lewis, Circuit Judges, and Irenas, District 

 Judge* 

 O R D E R

 It appearing that although it was the intention of the Court 

to affirm the order appealed in No. 93-7682 in the opinion and 

judgment entered August 17, 1993 in appeal Nos. 93-7338, 93-7351, 

93-7683 and 93-7725, see slip opinion at 12 n.12, due to a 

clerical error that docket number was not listed. It is hereby 

O R D E R E D that the caption of the August 17, 1994 opinion and 

judgment is amended to include docket No. 93-7682. It is further 

O R D E R E D that the certified judgment in lieu of formal 

mandate in No. 93-7682 shall issue forthwith. 

 By the Court, 

 

 /s/ Joseph E. Irenas

 District Judge 

Dated: September 29, 1994 
 

 * Honorable Joseph E. Irenas, United States District Judge 

for the District of New Jersey, sitting by designation.
§ 361.8 Limitations on notice and hearing requirements. ( a ) The procedural requirements of this part are not applicable to collections which result from: ( 1 ) An employee's election of coverage or of a change in coverage under a Federal benefits program which requires periodic deductions from pay and which cannot be placed into effect immediately because of normal processing delays; and
( 2 ) Ministerial adjustments in pay rates or allowances which cannot be placed into effect immediately because of normal processing delays.
( b ) *Limited procedures.* If the period of the normal processing delay for which the retroactive deduction must be recovered does not exceed four pay periods, the procedures provided in §§ 361.4 and 361.5 of this part shall not apply, but the Board shall in advance of the collection issue a general notice that: ( 1 ) Because of the employee's election, future salary will be reduced to cover the period between the effective date of the election and the first regular withholding, and the employee may dispute the amount of the retroactive collection by notifying a specified office or official; or
( 2 ) Due to a normal ministerial adjustment in pay or allowances which could not be placed into effect immediately, future salary will be reduced to cover any excess pay or allowances received by the employee, the employee may dispute the amount of the retroactive collection by notifying a specified office or official.
( c ) *Limitation on exceptions.* The exceptions described in paragraphs (a) and (b) of this section shall not include a recovery required to be made for any reason other than normal processing delays in putting the change into effect, even if the period of time for which the amounts must be retroactively withheld is less than four pay periods. Further, if normal processing delays exceed four pay periods, then the full procedures prescribed under §§ 361.4 and 361.5 of this part shall be extended to the employee.
### SUBCHAPTER II—ADMINISTRATIVE AND FUNDING AUTHORITIES
(No. 4252

#### Ralph E. Trepanier, Claimant, *vs.*State of Illinois, Respondent.

*Opinion filed March*7, *1950.*

Lindschin & Pucin, Attorneys for Claimant.

Ivan A. Elliott, Attorney General; C. Arthur Nebel, Assistant Attorney General, for Respondent.

*158Lansden, J.

Claimant, on December 16, 1949, filed Ms complaint in this Court, seeking to recover under tbe Workmen’s Compensation Act for injuries allegedly sustained in an accident arising out of and in tbe course of Ms employment.

Despondent filed a motion to dismiss based on tbe ground that no notice was given to respondent until more than thirty days after the accident.

The verified complaint alleges that the accident occurred on July 23, 1949, and notice was served on respondent on September 7, 1949. The following allegations of the complaint explain the reason for claimant’s delay in notifying respondent:

> “I was asked to take care of Winnebago County at the time of the accident in addition to covering five (5) other counties in Northern Illinois. I worked alone and my superior was located at Springfield. My injury did not appear serious at first and I hoped that the pain would ease up shortly. My vacation occurred the first two weeks in August, during which time I went away for a rest to relieve the pain. When I got home, I found a letter stating that I would be re-placed and continued to remain at home while being treated by Dr. H. Floyd Cannon. It was not until I failed to respond satisfactorily to medical treatment that I finally realized how serious my. injury was and requested Dr. H. Floyd Cannon to notify the proper authorities.

The above quoted allegations of the complaint, coupled with others, conclusively show that no superior of claimant had knowledge of the facts and circumstances of the accident until claimant’s own doctor notified the State Fire Marshal by a report dated September 7, 1949. No medical, surgical or hospital treatments have been furnished claimant, and no compensation has been paid.

The giving to an employer of notice of the accident witMn thirty days, unless the employer otherwise has *159knowledge thereof, is jurisdictional under Section 24 of the Workmen’s Compensation Act. *Stuenkel*v. *State,*16 C.C.R. 34; *Powers Storage Co.*v. *Ind. Com.,*340 Ill. 498; *Pullman Co.*v. *Ind. Com.,*356 Ill. 43; *Gray Knox Marble Co.*v. *Ind. Com.,*363 Ill. 210; *Armour & Co.*v. *Ind. Com.,*367 Ill. 471; *Brown Shoe Co.*v. *Ind. Com.,*374 Ill. 500.

The verified complaint herein, on its face, shows failure to comply with one of the jurisdictional prerequisites of the Workmen’s Compensation Act and the motion of respondent to dismiss must he sustained.

Motion of respondent to dismiss granted and case ■dismissed.
#### The Master Amusement Company, Incorporated, Respondent, v. The Master Mind Production Company, Incorporated, Appellant, Impleaded with Another.

Order affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements. No opinion. Present — Ingraham, P. J., Clarke, Scott, Dowling and Hotchkiss, JJ.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

DAY HIGH

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 171

 170

 168

 163

 158

 156

 201

 166

 145

 155

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 165

 158

 157

 146

 137

 137

 139

 140

 138

 138

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 169

 166

 163

 159

 151

 146

 159

 147

 143

 145

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

APRIL 2011 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: May 25, 2011

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

PITTSBURG BOTTOM ON THE SACRAMENTO RIVER
#### In the Matter of Alfred J. Wentz, an Attorney, Respondent. Brooklyn Bar Association, Petitioner.

Present — Close, P. J., Hagarty, Carswell, Johnston and Lewis, JJ.
**Exhibit 15.2**

** **

CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT PETROLEUM ENGINEERS

 

We hereby consent to the references to our firm, in the context that they appear, and to the use of our report effective December 31, 2015 in the Sundance Energy Australia Limited Annual Report on Form 20-F for the year ended December 31, 2015.  We also consent to the incorporation by reference of the references to our firm, in the context in which they appear, and to our exhibit letter dated April 30, 2016; into Sundance Energy Australia Limited’s previously filed Registration Statement on Form S-8 (No. 333-204490).

 
|   | /s/ RYDER SCOTT COMPANY, L.P. |
|--------|-------------------------------|
|   | RYDER SCOTT COMPANY, L.P.     |

 

Houston, Texas

May 2, 2016

 

----