alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### HOME SAVINGS OF AMERICA, FSB, and H.F. Ahmanson & Co., Plaintiffs-Appellees, v. UNITED STATES, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 2006-5081.

United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit.

July 27, 2006.

*ORDER*

Upon consideration of the motion to voluntarily dismiss this appeal filed by the United States, defendant-appellant in the above-captioned appeal, and the consent of Home Savings of America, FSB, and H.F. Ahmanson & Co., plaintiffs-appellees, to the motion, it is hereby

ORDERED that the United States’ motion is hereby granted, and it is further

ORDERED that this appeal is hereby DISMISSED with prejudice, with each party to bear its own costs.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1997
<CASH>                                             946
<SECURITIES>                                        43
<RECEIVABLES>                                    4,167
<ALLOWANCES>                                       185
<INVENTORY>                                        423
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 5,941
<PP&E>                                          50,727
<DEPRECIATION>                                  28,944
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  32,526
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            6,137
<BONDS>                                          7,961
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         1,009
<OTHER-SE>                                      12,644
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    32,526
<SALES>                                            138
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 4,845
<CGS>                                              213
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    2,382
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 1,110
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                    66
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 183
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  1,163
<INCOME-TAX>                                       470
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                693
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       693
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .70<F1>
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .70<F2>
<FN>
<F1> REPRESENTS BASIC EPS PREPARED IN ACCORDANCE WITH SFAS NO. 128.
<F2> REPRESENTS DILUTED EPS PREPARED IN ACCORDANCE WITH SFAS NO. 128.
</FN>




</TABLE>
§ 404.946 Issues before an administrative law judge. ( a ) *General.* The issues before the administrative law judge include all the issues brought out in the initial, reconsidered or revised determination that were not decided entirely in your favor. However, if evidence presented before or during the hearing causes the administrative law judge to question a fully favorable determination, he or she will notify you and will consider it an issue at the hearing.
( b ) *New issues* — ( 1 ) *General.* The administrative law judge may consider a new issue at the hearing if he or she notifies you and all the parties about the new issue any time after receiving the hearing request and before mailing notice of the hearing decision. The administrative law judge or any party may raise a new issue; an issue may be raised even though it arose after the request for a hearing and even though it has not been considered in an initial or reconsidered determination. However, it may not be raised if it involves a claim that is within the jurisdiction of a State agency under a Federal-State agreement concerning the determination of disability.
( 2 ) *Notice of a new issue.* The administrative law judge shall notify you and any other party if he or she will consider any new issue. Notice of the time and place of the hearing on any new issues will be given in the manner described in § 404.938, unless you have indicated in writing that you do not wish to receive the notice.
[45 FR 52081, Aug. 5, 1980, as amended at 51 FR 303, Jan. 3, 1986]
! ! !

! !

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

T8

T9

T16

T33

T4

T2

T38

T10

T17

T1

T31

T39

T21

T35

T32

T26

T7

H2

T30

H3

H4

T5

T13

6S

22E

6S

23E

7S

22E

6S

21E

7S

23E

7S

21E

022

007

011

034

036

027

019

018

013

023

007

012

024

018

015

021

019

031

030

010

020

033

030

025

008

017

026

029

028

016

035

009

031 032

014

005

004

006

006

003

001

002

012

002

013

001

024

003

006

025

004

036

005 006

032

001

029

020

001

017

005

Old Corral

McLeod Flat

Cedar Valley

Willow Creek

Calvin Crest

Sivels Ranch

Soquel Meadow

Poison Meadow

Redwood Creek

Greys Mountain

Chilkoot Creek

Gooseberry Flat

Sivels Mountain

Chipmunk Meadow

Bass Lake Vista

Graham Mountain

Paradise Springs

California Creek

Soquel Campground

Soquel Meadow Ranch

Cold Springs Meadow

Chilkoot Campground

Nelder Grove Campground

Greys Mountain Campground

Texas Flat Group Campground

05S007

06S010

06S008

06S090

06S040

06S038

06S013

06S042

06S011

06S036

06S006

06S010X

06S040X

MAD222

06S097

06S099

06S057

05S095

05S019

06S088

06S072

06S039

06S040XB

06S010XC

05S018

06S098

MAD632

07S082

07S520B

06S095

06S058X

06S002X

06S010R 05S019B

06S011A

06S018

06S057A

06S047Y

05S039

07S006

06S011X

06S040XA

07S019

05S007N

06S013B

06S070

06S006G

06S028

06S038C

06S006F

06S026X

06S072Y

06S008C

05S095YC

07S520

06S038A

06S090B

06S065

06S013D

05S007R

06S010Y

05S007T

06S038X

06S090E

06S013H

06S002XB

05S095Y

06S028B

06S010YB

06S040D

06S032

06S088D

06S504

06S013G

06S047YA

05S007Z

06S013Y

06S013F

06S008A

06S011B

06S038E

06S006C 06S010A

06S013A

06S095A

06S011E

06S011F

06S013E

06S012B

06S098B

06S010YA

06S002XA

06S039A

06S072A

06S099B

06S097A

06S006A

06S028A

06S090G

06S065A 06S010B

008

005

Scale

0 0.25 0.5 1 1.5 2

Miles

4 Legend

Project Boundary

Private Property

Rx Burning within Thinning

Grey's Mountain Ecological Restoration Project Map 4

Rx Burning Treatments within Thinning Areas

Burt Stalter 11/2011

1:48,000
### Part C—Commissary and Mess Services and Recreation Facilities
#### § 404.705 Failure to give requested evidence.

Generally, you will be asked to give us by a certain date specific kinds of evidence or information to prove you are eligible for benefits. If we do not receive the evidence or information by that date, we may decide you are not eligible for benefits. If you are already receiving benefits, you may be asked to give us by a certain date information needed to decide whether you continue to be entitled to benefits or whether your benefits should be stopped or reduced. If you do not give us the requested information by the date given, we may decide that you are no longer entitled to benefits or that your benefits should be stopped or reduced. You should let us know if you are unable to give us the requested evidence within the specified time and explain why there will be a delay. If this delay is due to illness, failure to receive timely evidence you have asked for from another source, or a similar circumstance, you will be given additional time to give us the evidence.
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

January 24, 2018

No. 04-17-00769-CV

IN THE INTEREST OF L.M.T., ET AL., CHILDREN,

From the 45th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2016-PA-00862

Honorable Norma Gonzales, Judge Presiding

O R D E R

This is an accelerated appeal of the trial court’s order terminating both parents’ parental 

rights. The appellants’ briefs were originally due to be filed on January 2, 2018. 

By order dated January 3, 2018, the first motion for extension of time filed by appellant

D.P. (the mother) was granted, extending the deadline to file the brief to January 22, 2018. 

Because the disposition of this appeal is governed by the standards set forth in Rule 6.2 of the 

Texas Rules of Judicial Administration our order noted this appeal is required to be brought to 

final disposition within 180 days of the date the notice of appeal is filed. TEX. R. JUD. ADMIN.

6.2. Our order further stated, “Given the time constraints governing the disposition of this 

appeal, further requests for extensions of time will be disfavored.”

On January 22, 2018, appellant’s attorney filed a second motion for extension of time 

requesting an additional twenty-day extension due to the attorney’s workload. The motion is 

GRANTED. THIS IS THE FINAL EXTENSION OF TIME THAT APPELLANT D.P. 

WILL BE GRANTED. Appellant D.P.’s brief must be filed no later than February 12, 2018.

_________________________________

Sandee Bryan Marion, Chief Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said 

court on this 24th day of January, 2018.

___________________________________

KEITH E. HOTTLE,

Clerk of Court
```

[Federal Register Volume 79, Number 89 (Thursday, May 8, 2014)]
[Notices]
[Page 26404]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2014-10649]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

COMMISSION ON CIVIL RIGHTS

Sunshine Act Notice

AGENCY: United States Commission on Civil Rights.

ACTION: Notice of Business Meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DATE AND TIME: Friday, May 16, 2014; 9:30 a.m. EST.

PLACE: 1331 Pennsylvania Ave. NW., Suite 1150, Washington, DC 20425.

MEETING AGENDA

I. Approval of Agenda
II. Program Planning
     Discussion and Vote on Part A of the briefing report: Sex 
Trafficking: A Gender-Based Civil Rights Violation
     Discussion and Vote on Part A of the briefing report: 
Engagement with Arab and Muslim American Communities Post 9/11
     Consideration and Vote on Commission Resolution 
Commemorating the Anniversary of the Civil Rights Act of 1964
III. Management and Operations
     Staff Director's Report
IV. State Advisory Committee (SAC) Appointments
     Connecticut
     Kansas
     Utah
     Vermont
V. Adjourn Meeting

CONTACT PERSON FOR FURTHER INFORMATION: Lenore Ostrowsky, Acting Chief, 
Public Affairs Unit (202) 376-8591.
    Hearing-impaired persons who will attend the meeting and require 
the services of a sign language interpreter should contact Pamela 
Dunston at (202) 376-8105 or at signlanguage@usccr.gov at least seven 
business days before the scheduled date of the meeting.

    Dated: May 5, 2014.
Marlene Sallo,
Staff Director.
[FR Doc. 2014-10649 Filed 5-6-14; 11:15 am]
BILLING CODE 6335-01-P
```
§ 408.665 How does your representative payee account for the use of your SVB payments? ( a ) Your representative payee must account for the use of your benefits. We require written reports from your representative payee at least once a year.
( b ) Your representative payee is exempt from the accounting requirement when your representative payee is the spouse of an individual eligible for SVB payments.
( c ) We may verify how your representative payee used your benefits. Your representative payee should keep records of how benefits were used in order to provide accounting reports and must make those records available upon our request. If your representative payee fails to provide an annual accounting of benefits or other required report, we may require your payee to appear in person at the local Social Security field office or a United States Government facility that we designate serving the area in which you reside. The decision to have your representative payee receive your benefits in person may be based on a variety of reasons. Some of these reasons may include the payee's history of past performance or our past difficulty in contacting the payee. We may ask your representative payee to give us the following information: ( 1 ) Where you lived during the accounting period;
( 2 ) Who made the decisions on how your benefits were spent or saved;
( 3 ) How your benefit payments were used; and
( 4 ) How much of your benefit payments were saved and how the savings were invested.
[87 FR 35653, June 13, 2022]
**EXHIBIT 32.2**

 

CERTIFICATIONPURSUANT TO RULE 13a-14(b) OF THE EXCHANGE ACT AND 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,ASENACTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

 

Inconnection with the Quarterly Report of Intrusion Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-QSBfor the three and six-month periods ending June 30, 2005 as filed with theSecurities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I,Michael L. Paxton, Chief Financial Officer of the Company certify, pursuant to18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as enacted pursuant to Section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

(1)                                  The Report fully complies with therequirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2)                                  The information contained in the Reportfairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and resultsof operations of the Company.

 

 
| August 12, 2005 | /s/ Michael L. Paxton   |   |
|----------------------|-------------------------|--------|
|                 | Michael L. Paxton       |
|                 | Chief Financial Officer |

 

----
Rory A. McMahon 

Commissioner of Aviation 

DEPARTMENT OF AVIATION 


Stephanie A. Miner, Mayor 


The Honorable Ray LaHood 


United States Department of Transportation 


1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE 


~---Washington, DC 20590 

Dear Secretary LaHood: 

On behalfof Syracuse Hancock International Airport, I am writing to express our 

strong support for the Delta Air Lines application for new nonstop service between 

Detroit and Haneda. 

Approval of Delta's new service would be a major benefit for our region, where 

many corporations have a strong trade and market presence with Japan. With 5 daily 

. flights between Syracuse and Detroit Metro Airport, our businesses would benefit from 

convenient connections to Tokyo's Haneda airport. Our community, too, would ertioy 

the enhanced relationship building benefit that would result should this application be 

granted. 

Detroit is a proven and successful gateway to Asia. This summer Delta is adding 

new service to Seoul and Hong Kong, fulfilling the commitment Delta made to DTW to 

make it the airlines gateway to Asia. The addition of Haneda as a destination is a natural 

fit that would clearly benefit our business travelers. 

Thank you for consideration ofthis request 

Sincerely, 

~!.~~ Commissioner ofAviation 

HANCOCK INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT. SYRACUSE, N.Y. 13212 • (315) 454-3263 • FAX: (315) 454·8757 • www.syrairport.org
#### § 404.967 Appeals Council review—general.

If you or any other party is dissatisfied with the hearing decision or with the dismissal of a hearing request, you may request that the Appeals Council review that action. The Appeals Council may deny or dismiss the request for review, or it may grant the request and either issue a decision or remand the case to an administrative law judge. The Appeals Council shall notify the parties at their last known address of the action it takes.
§ 320.8 Notice of initial determination. ( a ) *Benefits payable.* If benefits are payable for a claim, no special notice of the award will be issued to the claimant. A notice of the award will be sent to the base-year employer(s). The amount of benefits due will be certified to the United States Treasury Department for payment.
( b ) *Benefits not payable.* If an initial determination results in denial of a claim, either in whole or in part, the adjudicating office shall issue a notice of the denial within 15 days of the date that it makes its determination. The notice shall explain the basis for the denial of benefits and shall set forth what steps the claimant can take to contest the denial.
( c ) *Communication of notice of denial.* When the adjudicating office mails the denial notice to the claimant's address of record, it shall be considered that notice of the denial has been communicated to the claimant on the date of mailing such notice. If the adjudicating office has been notified that a claimant has an attorney or other representative helping him or her with the claim, a copy of the denial notice shall be sent to the attorney or such other representative.
[53 FR 2486, Jan. 28, 1988, as amended at 56 FR 65679, Dec. 18, 1991]
<PAGE>

Exhibit 11:

Statement re: Computation of Per Share Earnings

Earnings per share ("EPS") are calculated on a Basic EPS and Diluted EPS
basis. Basic EPS excludes dilution and is computed by dividing income
available to common shareholders (the numerator) by the weighted-average
number of common shares outstanding (the denominator) during the period.
Income available to common shareholders is Net Income in the table below and
as reported in Bancorp's income statement. No adjustments were required to
net income for any EPS calculations.

Diluted EPS is calculated by adjusting the denominator for all dilutive
potential common shares that were outstanding during the period. Bancorp had
stock options outstanding during the periods presented below which had a
dilutive effect on EPS. Therefore, the number of additional common shares
that would have been outstanding if the options had been exercised is added
to the denominator to arrive at the dilutive number of shares.

The calculations of earnings per share below are based on the weighted
average number of shares outstanding, including all common stock and common
stock equivalents in conformity with the instructions for Item 601 of
Regulation S-K.


                                       26
§ 408.812 What happens to your SVB payments if you are not a citizen or national of the United States and you begin residing in a Treasury-restricted country? ( a ) *Suspension effective date.* If you are not a citizen or national of the United States, we will suspend your SVB payments effective with the first full calendar month you are residing in a country to which the Treasury Department restricts payments under 31 U.S.C. 3329.
( b ) *Resumption of payments.* If benefits are otherwise payable, they will be resumed effective with the first day of the first month in which you are not residing in a Treasury-restricted country.
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,  AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of ALCO, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the  period ended September 30, 2006 (the "Report"), I, Yip Kam Ming, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

> 1) The Report fully complies with the requirement of Section 13(a) or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange
> Act of 1934; and
> 
> 
> 2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the Company's
> financial position and results of operations.

/s/ Yip Kam Ming



Yip Kam Ming,

 Chief Financial Officer

November 14, 2006
Exhibit 99.6



CONSENT OF V. SPRING



I hereby consent to the use of my name in connection with the following documents and reports, which are being filed as exhibits to and incorporated by reference into the registration statement on Form 40-F of Silver Wheaton Corp. (the Company) being filed with the United States Securities and Exchange Commission:



1.

Information regarding the resource and reserve estimates of the San Dimas Mine;



2.

Information regarding the resource and reserve estimates of the Yauliyacu Mine;



3.

Information regarding the resource and reserve estimates of the San Martin Mine;



4.

The technical report dated March 28, 2008, entitled A Technical Review on the Yauliyacu Lead/Zinc Mine, Junin Province, Perú for Silver Wheaton Corp. (the Yauliyacu Report);



5.

The technical report dated February 22, 2008 entitled An Audit for the Mineral Reserves/Resources Tayoltita, Santa Rita and San Antonio Mines as of December 31, 2007 for Silver Wheaton Corp. (the San Dimas Report); and



6.

The annual information form of the Company dated March 28, 2008, which includes reference to my name in connection with information relating to the San Dimas Mine, the Yauliyacu Mine, the Yauliyacu Report and the San Dimas Report and the properties described therein.







Date: March 28, 2008

| |  |                                                                                                                        
| |  | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| |  | /s/ Velasquez Spring, P. Eng

Name: Velasquez Spring, P. Eng
Title: Senior Geologist,
Watts, Griffis and McOuat Limited
#### George Cooper, as Administrator of the Estate of Robert L. Cooper, Deceased, Respondent, v. State of New York, Appellant.

(Claim No. 28190.)

— The State of New York has appealed from a judgment of the Court of Claims in claimant’s favor. The Court of Claims found that claimant’s intestate came to his death by reason of a defect in the State highway extending from Cortland to Syracuse. It found that the State was negligent in the maintenance of the highway in question. Only questions of fact are involved. Judgment of the Court of Claims affirmed, with costs to respondent. Hill, P. J., Heffernan and Foster, JJ., concur; Brewster and Deyo, JJ., dissent.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-mos
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          Dec-31-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               Jun-30-1997
<CASH>                                              63  
<SECURITIES>                                         0  
<RECEIVABLES>                                    3,239  
<ALLOWANCES>                                       250  
<INVENTORY>                                        291  
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 3,994  
<PP&E>                                          36,117  
<DEPRECIATION>                                  20,282  
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  26,795  
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            5,965  
<BONDS>                                          7,386  
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0  
<PREFERRED>                                          0  
<COMMON>                                           456  
<OTHER-SE>                                       6,485  
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    26,795  
<SALES>                                              0  
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 6,815  
<CGS>                                                0  
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    5,617  
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                    12  
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0  
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 370  
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    842  
<INCOME-TAX>                                       302  
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                540  
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0  
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0  
<CHANGES>                                            0  
<NET-INCOME>                                       540  
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     1.90  
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.90  
                                               


</TABLE>
- FPL_1553-Cocr-1
- FPL_1553-Cocr-2
- FPL_1553-Cocr-3
- FPL_1553-Cocr-4
- FPL_1553-Cocr-5
- FPL_1553-Cocr-6
- FPL_1553-Cocr-7
- FPL_1553-Cocr-8
- FPL_1553-Cocr-9
- FPL_1553-Cocr-10
- FPL_1553-Cocr-11
- FPL_1553-Cocr-12
- FPL_1553-Cocr-13
- FPL_1553-Cocr-14