alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### Johnny Paul DODSON, Appellant, v. Larry NORRIS, Director, Arkansas Department of Correction; Ray Hobbs, Assistant Director, Arkansas Department of Correction; Gaylon Lay, Warden, Cummins Unit, ADC; Randall Manus, Assistant Warden, Cummins Unit, ADC; Kim Luckett, Assistant Warden, Cummins Unit, ADC; William Fowler, Treatment Coordinator, Cummins Unit, ADC; Angela West, Mailroom Supervisor, Cummins Unit, ADC; Melody Barnett, Inmate Attorney; Sue Newbery, Criminal Justice Coordinator, Arkansas Supreme Court, Appellees.

No. 04-3724.

United States Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit.

Submitted: Jan. 30, 2006.

Filed: Feb. 22, 2006.

Johnny Paul Dodson, Tucker, AR, pro se.

John Kevin Coker, Christine Ann Cryer, Attorney General’s Office, Little Rock, AR, for Appellees.

Before MURPHY, HANSEN, and COLLOTON, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

Arkansas inmate Johnny Dodson appeals the district court’s1 dismissal of his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint for failure to exhaust and the court’s denial of his motion for appointment of counsel.

We conclude that the district court did not err in dismissing Dodson’s complaint against the prison officials for failure to exhaust, as the record does not show Dodson filed any grievances about his claims against defendants Melody Barnett, Randall Manus, Gaylon Lay, Ray Hobbs, and Larry Norris. *See Graves v. Norris,*218 F.3d 884, 885 (8th Cir.2000) (per curiam) (prisoner must exhaust all available administrative remedies before § 1983 action can be brought with respect to prison conditions; when multiple prison claims are joined, 42 U.S.C. § 1997e(a) requires exhaustion as to all claims).

As for the claims against defendant Susan Newbery, in her capacity as Criminal Justice Coordinator for the Arkansas Supreme Court, the district court properly dismissed the claim for monetary damages with prejudice due to immunity, as Newbery was clearly acting in her official capacity. *See Morstad v. Dept. of Corrs. and*
      *142
      *Rehab.,*147 F.3d 741, 744 (8th Cir.1998). Although Newbery was not immune from Dodson’s requested injunctive relief, *see Campbell v. Ark. Dept. of Corr.,*155 F.3d 950, 962 (8th Cir.1998), injunctive relief would be inappropriate, because Dodson failed to show, among other things, that he was faced with a threat of irreparable harm, *see Davis v. Francis Howell Sch. Dist.,*104 F.3d 204, 205-06 (8th Cir.1997).

Finally, we conclude that the court did not abuse its discretion in denying the motion for appointment of counsel. *See Abdullah v. Gunter,*949 F.2d 1032, 1035 (8th Cir.1991), *cert. denied,*504 U.S. 930, 112 S.Ct. 1995, 118 L.Ed.2d 591 (1992). Accordingly, we affirm.

. The Honorable J. Leon Holmes, Chief Judge, United States District Court for the Eastern District of Arkansas, adopting in part the report and recommendations of the Honorable Henry L. Jones, Jr., United States Magistrate Judge for the Eastern District of Arkansas.
#### § 404.940 Disqualification of the administrative law judge.

An administrative law judge shall not conduct a hearing if he or she is prejudiced or partial with respect to any party or has any interest in the matter pending for decision. If you object to the administrative law judge who will conduct the hearing, you must notify the administrative law judge at your earliest opportunity. The administrative law judge shall consider your objections and shall decide whether to proceed with the hearing or withdraw. If he or she withdraws, the Associate Commissioner for Hearings and Appeals, or his or her delegate, will appoint another administrative law judge to conduct the hearing. If the administrative law judge does not withdraw, you may, after the hearing, present your objections to the Appeals Council as reasons why the hearing decision should be revised or a new hearing held before another administrative law judge.
#### § 404.1571 General.

The work, without regard to legality, that you have done during any period in which you believe you are disabled may show that you are able to work at the substantial gainful activity level. If you are able to engage in substantial gainful activity, we will find that you are not disabled. (We explain the rules for persons who are statutorily blind in § 404.1584.) Even if the work you have done was not substantial gainful activity, it may show that you are able to do more work than you actually did. We will consider all of the medical and vocational evidence in your file to decide whether or not you have the ability to engage in substantial gainful activity.

[45 FR 55584, Aug. 20, 1980, as amended at 65 FR 42783, July 11, 2000]
# C_2015440EN.01030201.xml

| 30.12.2015 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 440/302 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

30.12.2015

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 440/302

---

P7_TA(2013)0025

Interim agreement establishing a framework for an EC-Eastern and Southern Africa States Economic Partnership Agreement ***

European Parliament legislative resolution of 17 January 2013 on the draft Council decision on the conclusion of the Interim Agreement establishing a framework for an Economic Partnership Agreement between Eastern and Southern Africa States, on the one part, and the European Community and its Member States, on the other part (11699/2012 — C7-0193/2012 — 2008/0251(NLE))

(Consent)

(2015/C 440/33)

The European Parliament,

The European Parliament

| — | having regard to the draft Council decision (11699/2012), |
| --- | --- |

—

having regard to the draft Council decision (11699/2012),

| — | having regard to the Interim Agreement establishing a framework for an Economic Partnership Agreement between Eastern and Southern Africa States, on the one part, and the European Community and its Member States, on the other part (1), |
| --- | --- |

—

having regard to the Interim Agreement establishing a framework for an Economic Partnership Agreement between Eastern and Southern Africa States, on the one part, and the European Community and its Member States, on the other part (1),

1

| — | having regard to the request for consent submitted by the Council in accordance with Article 207(4), Article 209(2) and Article 218(6), second subparagraph, point (a), of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (C7-0193/2012), |
| --- | --- |

—

having regard to the request for consent submitted by the Council in accordance with Article 207(4), Article 209(2) and Article 218(6), second subparagraph, point (a), of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (C7-0193/2012),

| — | having regard to Rules 81 and 90(7) of its Rules of Procedure, |
| --- | --- |

—

having regard to Rules 81 and 90(7) of its Rules of Procedure,

| — | having regard to the recommendation of the Committee on International Trade and the opinion of the Committee on Development (A7-0431/2012), |
| --- | --- |

—

having regard to the recommendation of the Committee on International Trade and the opinion of the Committee on Development (A7-0431/2012),

| 1. | Consents to conclusion of the Agreement; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Consents to conclusion of the Agreement;

| 2. | Instructs its President to forward its position to the Council, the Commission and the governments and parliaments of the Member States and of Madagascar, Mauritius, the Seychelles and Zimbabwe. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Instructs its President to forward its position to the Council, the Commission and the governments and parliaments of the Member States and of Madagascar, Mauritius, the Seychelles and Zimbabwe.

---

(1)  OJ L 111, 24.4.2012, p. 2.

1

---
**EXHIBIT 12.2**

 

**COMPUTATIONOF RATIO OF EARNINGS TO FIXED CHARGES**

 

**PURSUANTTO THE SUPPORT AGREEMENT**

**BETWEENTHE COMPANY AND PACCAR**

#### **(Millions of Dollars)**

 
|                                |   | **Nine Months Ended****September 30,** |      |
|-------------------------------------|--------|----------------------------------------|-----------|
|                                |   | **2001**                               |      | **2000** |   |
|                                |   | **(Unaudited)**                        |      |
|                                |   |                                   |      |   |   |
| FIXED CHARGES                       |   |                                   |      |   |   |
| Interest  expense                   |   | **$**                                  | **135.3** |   | $ | 150.8 |   |
| Facility and  equipment rental      |   | **1.2**                                |      | .7 |   |
|                                |   |                                   |      |   |   |
| TOTAL FIXED  CHARGES                |   | **$**                                  | **136.5** |   | $ | 151.5 |   |
|                                |   |                                   |      |   |   |
|                                |   |                                   |      |   |   |
| EARNINGS                            |   |                                   |      |   |   |
| Income before  taxes                |   | **$**                                  | **8.1**   |   | $ | 43.1 |   |
| Depreciation                        |   | **9.8**                                |      | 7.2 |   |
|                                |   | **17.9**                               |      | 50.3 |   |
| Fixed charges                       |   | **136.5**                              |      | 151.5 |   |
|                                |   |                                   |      |   |   |
| EARNINGS AS  DEFINED                |   | **$**                                  | **154.4** |   | $ | 201.8 |   |
|                                |   |                                   |      |   |   |
|                                |   |                                   |      |   |   |
| RATIO OF  EARNINGS TO FIXED CHARGES |   | **1.13x**                              |      | 1.33x |   |
### §§1558 to 1558h. Repealed. Aug. 26, 1954, ch. 937, title V, §542(a)(8), 68 Stat. 861

Sections 1558 to 1558c, act Dec. 29, 1950, ch. 1182, §§2–5, 64 Stat. 1122, 1123, related to amount of funds available; agreement; terms; utilization of available funds; and nonendorsement of internal measures of Yugoslavian Government.

Section 1558d, act Dec. 29, 1950, ch. 1182, §6, 64 Stat. 1123, required the Secretary of State to make quarterly reports to Congress. See section 2394 of this title.

Sections 1558e to 1558g, act Dec. 29, 1950, ch. 1182, §§7–9, 64 Stat. 1123, 1124, related to transfer of available funds to Federal departments or agencies; local currency made available to United States; and shipping regulations. See sections 2353 and 2360 of this title.

Section 1558h, act Dec. 29, 1950, ch. 1182, §10, 64 Stat. 1124, related to termination of assistance. See section 2367 of this title.
CENTRAL VALLEY OPERATIONS OFFICE

CHINOOK SALMON REPORT

November 2010

Note: Shaded area not verified with DFG data Preliminary Data - Subject to Change

Winter Run Chinook Salmon Estimated Loss (Incidental Take) Spring Run Chinook Salmon Estimated Loss (Incidental Take) 

Daily SWP Daily CVP Daily Combined Season Combined Daily SWP Daily CVP Daily Combined Season Combined Dail

Tagged* No Tag Tagged* No Tag Tagged* No Tag Tagged* No Tag Tagged No Tag Tagged No Tag Tagged No Tag Tagged No Tag In 

DATE Estimated Estimated Estimated Estimated Estimated Estimated Estimated Estimated Estimated Estimated Estimated Estimated Estimated Estimated Estimated Estimated

Loss Loss Loss Loss Loss Loss Loss Loss Loss Loss Loss Loss Loss Loss Loss Loss

1-Nov-10 0000 0000 0000 0000 5,160 

2-Nov-10 0000 0000 0000 0000 5,074 3-Nov-10 0000 0000 0000 0000 4,960 4-Nov-10 0000 0000 0000 0000 4,932 5-Nov-10 0000 0000 0000 0000 5,909 6-Nov-10 0000 0000 0000 0000 1,549 7-Nov-10 0000 0000 0000 0000 6,629 8-Nov-10 0000 0000 0000 0000 4,809 9-Nov-10 0000 0000 0000 0000 4,864 

10-Nov-10 0000 0000 0000 0000 5,239 11-Nov-10 0000 0000 0000 0000 5,239 12-Nov-10 0000 0000 0000 0000 5,465 13-Nov-10 0000 0000 0000 0000 4,815 

14-Nov-10 0000 0000 0000 0000 4,138 

15-Nov-10 0000 0000 0000 0000 4,174 16-Nov-10 0000 0000 0000 0000 4,166 17-Nov-10 0000 0000 0000 0000 4,392 18-Nov-10 0000 0000 0000 0000 4,110 19-Nov-10 0000 0000 0000 0000 4,107 20-Nov-10 0000 0000 0000 0000 4,494 21-Nov-10 0000 0000 0000 0000 4,489 22-Nov-10 0000 0000 0000 0000 4,489 23-Nov-10 0000 0000 0000 0000 5,525 24-Nov-10 0000 0000 0000 0000 5,921 25-Nov-10 0000 0000 0000 0000 5,618 26-Nov-10 0000 0000 0000 0000 5,541 

27-Nov-10 0000 0000 0000 0000 5,428 28-Nov-10 0000 0000 0000 0000 6,150 29-Nov-10 0000 0000 0000 0000 5,840 30-Nov-10 0000 0000 0000 0000 5,739 

Total 0000 0 0 0 0000 00000 148,967 1

Winter Run Incidental Take Levels (Oct 1 thru May 31) Spring Run Incidental Take Levels for Season Combined Total (Oct 1 thru Jun 30)

Banks T
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

DAY ELEV

 222.09

 220.94

 221.20

 221.80

 222.11

 222.77

 223.08

 221.66

 223.29

 222.84

 222.14

 221.21

 220.82

 220.34

 220.32

 220.99

 221.32

 221.06

 221.57

 222.55

 222.21

 221.22

 221.27

 221.22

 220.96

 220.62

 220.90

 220.17

 219.86

 221.34

 48,624

 45,603

 46,285

 47,861

 48,677

 50,433

 51,260

 47,493

 51,821

 50,619

 48,756

 46,311

 45,289

 44,036

 43,983

 45,734

 46,600

 45,918

 47,257

 49,847

 48,942

 46,338

 46,469

 46,338

 45,656

 44,766

 45,498

 43,593

 42,790

 46,653

STORAGE

-318

-3,021

+682

+1,576

+816

+1,756

+827

-3,767

+4,328

-1,202

-1,863

-2,445

-1,022

-1,253

-53

+1,751

+866

-682

+1,339

+2,590

-905

-2,604

+131

-131

-682

-890

+732

-1,905

-803

+3,863

CHANGE

2,138

2,089

2,661

2,857

3,109

3,159

3,080

3,211

3,271

1,710

1,320

1,384

1,348

952

711

621

149

86

150

317

445

309

70

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

PUMPING

 1,250

 1,459

 1,586

 1,259

 785

 524

 19

 886

 885

 0

 938

 1,053

 1,261

 1,535

 1,676

 1,670

 1,492

 1,257

 944

 1,562

 1,495

 2,040

 2,045

 1,973

 1,567

 1,365

 1,498

 2,381

 2,795

 2,272

PUMPING

 2,191

 2,498

 1,247

 1,247

 2,513

 1,874

 3,115

 4,351

 1,240

 3,118

 1,848

 1,839

 1,226

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 780

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

PUMPING

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 45

 312

 557

 483

 345

 331

 868

 259

 99

GEN.

*

-79

-143

+55

+53

+81

+71

+25

-90

+180

-127

-153

-233

-72

-51

-91

-66

+2

-108

-138

+185

+86

-85

-150

+35

-81

-232

-101

-127

-111

+344

OR

UNITED STATES 

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION

CONSOLIDATED STATE-FEDERAL O'NEILL FOREBAY June 12, 2020

DAILY OPERATIONS

APRIL 2020 RUN DATE:

IN LAKE GEN.

ACRE-FEET O'NEILL

RELEASE - C.F.S. 

TOTALS -2,289 35,147 3,299 29,087 41,472 -1,121

ACRE-FEET -2,289 69,714 6,544 57,694 82,260

SUMMARY

 537

RELEASE (ACRE-FEET)

O'NEILL GEN. 6,544

SAN LUIS PUMP 57,694 537

 48,942

DOS AMIGOS PUMP 82,260

DELIVERIES 

S. LUIS O'NEILL

 633

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 642

 1,924

 1,200

 647

 1,376

 1,280

 0

 0

 1,940

 1,934

 1,287

 891

 1,930

 1,927

 2,091

 3,860

 23,562

 46,735

CALIF. DOS AMIGOS

AQUEDUCT

588

488

459

390

519

54

446

216

856

929

679

508

695

2

387

74

577

289

231

1,086

1,288

550

563

494

501

602

370

489

669

385

 15,384

 30,514

S. LUIS

DELIV.

GAINS(+)

LOSS(-)

C.F.S.

INFLOW - C.F.S.

STATE OF CALIFORNIA

THE RESOURCES AGENCY

DEPARTMENT OF WATER RESOURCES

STATE WATER PROJECT

TOTAL 147,035

-2,224

* DAILY DEL. FIGURES UNAVAILABLE. TOT. DEL. IS INCLUDED IN COMPUTING MONTHLY TOTALS 

Table 18
USGS HomeContact USGSSearch USGS

Open-File Report 2014-1203

### Maps Showing Bathymetry and Modern Sediment Thickness on the Inner Continental Shelf Offshore of Fire Island, New York, Pre-Hurricane Sandy

----

AccessibilityFOIAPrivacyPolicies and Notices

U.S. Department of the Interior |            U.S. Geological Survey                                                URL: http://pubs.usgs.gov/of/2014/1203/ofr2014-1203-figures.html            Page Contact Information: GS Pubs Web Contact                        Page Last Modified: Thursday, November 06, 2014, 05:14:59 PM
### §2354. Penalties; waivers; exceptions

#### (a) Penalties

Any person that violates, attempts to violate, conspires to violate, or causes a violation of this subchapter or any regulation, license, or order issued to carry out this subchapter shall be subject to the penalties set forth in subsections (b) and (c) of section 1705 of title 50 to the same extent as a person that commits an unlawful act described in subsection (a) of that section.

#### (b) National security waiver

The President may waive the application of sanctions under this subchapter with respect to a foreign person if the President determines that such waiver is in the national security interest of the United States.

#### (c) Exceptions

#### (1) Exception for intelligence activities

This subchapter shall not apply with respect to activities subject to the reporting requirements under title V of the National Security Act of 1947 (50 U.S.C. 3091 et seq.) or any authorized intelligence activities of the United States.

#### (2) Exception for compliance with international obligations and law enforcement activities

Sanctions under this subchapter shall not apply with respect to an alien if admitting or paroling the alien into the United States is necessary—

(A) to permit the United States to comply with the Agreement regarding the Headquarters of the United Nations, signed at Lake Success on June 26, 1947, and entered into force November 21, 1947, between the United Nations and the United States, or other applicable international obligations of the United States; or

(B) to carry out or assist law enforcement activity of the United States.

#### (3) Humanitarian exemption

The President may not impose sanctions under this subchapter with respect to any person for conducting or facilitating a transaction for the sale of agricultural commodities, food, medicine, or medical devices or for the provision of humanitarian assistance.

(Pub. L. 118–50, div. E, title I, §3104, Apr. 24, 2024, 138 Stat. 937.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

The National Security Act of 1947, referred to in subsec. (c)(1), is act July 26, 1947, ch. 343, 61 Stat. 495. Title V of the Act is classified generally to subchapter III (§3091 et seq.) of chapter 44 of Title 50, War and National Defense. For complete classification of this Act to the Code, see Tables.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE 

TIFFANY NOBLE, § 

§ No. 570, 2015 

 Defendant-Below, § 

 Appellant, § 

§ Court Below: Superior Court 

v. § of the State of Delaware 

 § 

STATE OF DELAWARE, § Cr. ID No. 1210008119 

 § 

 Plaintiff-Below, § 

 Appellee. § 

Submitted: May 4, 2016 

Decided: May 6, 2016 

Before STRINE, Chief Justice; VALIHURA, and SEITZ, Justices. 

ORDER

 This 6th day of May, 2016, after careful consideration of the parties’ briefs 

and the record on appeal, we find it evident that the final judgment of the Superior 

Court should be affirmed on the basis of and for the reasons stated in its October 8, 

2015 decision. 

 NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS ORDERED that the final judgment of the 

Superior Court is AFFIRMED. 

 BY THE COURT: 

 /s/ Collins J. Seitz, Jr.

 Justice
Affirmed and Memorandum Opinion filed July 18, 2024.

In The

Fourteenth Court of Appeals

NO. 14-23-00795-CR

CONSUELO GRAY, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the 85th District Court

Brazos County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 22-01816-CRF-85

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Appellant Consuelo Gray appeals her conviction for manufacture or delivery 

of a controlled substance causing death or serious bodily injury. Tex. Health & 

Safety Code § 481.141. Appellant’s appointed counsel filed a brief in which he 

concludes the appeal is wholly frivolous and without merit. The brief meets the 

requirements of Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), by presenting a 

professional evaluation of the record and demonstrating why there are no arguable 
2

grounds to be advanced. See High v. State, 573 S.W.2d 807, 811–13 (Tex. Crim. 

App. 1978).

A copy of counsel’s brief was delivered to appellant. Appellant was advised 

of the right to examine the appellate record and file a pro se response. See Stafford 

v. State, 813 S.W.2d 503, 512 (Tex. Crim. App. 1991). As of this date, more than 60 

days have passed and no pro se response has been filed.

We have carefully reviewed the record and counsel’s brief and agree the 

appeal is wholly frivolous and without merit. Further, we find no reversible error in 

the record. We are not to address the merits of each claim raised in an Anders brief 

or a pro se response when we have determined there are no arguable grounds for 

review. See Bledsoe v. State, 178 S.W.3d 824, 827–28 (Tex. Crim. App. 2005).

Accordingly, the judgment of the trial court is affirmed.

PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Justices Jewell, Zimmerer, and Hassan.

Do Not Publish — Tex. R. App. P. 47.2(b).
### §211. Repealed. July 3, 1926, ch. 772, §4, 44 Stat. 887

Section, R.S. §4075; act June 14, 1902, ch. 1088, §1, 32 Stat. 386, provided for issuance of passports. See section 211a of this title.
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Pasquale Julliano, Appellant.

Judgment of conviction of the County Court of Richmond county affirmed. No opinion. Jenks, P. J., Carr, Rich, Stapleton and Putnam, JJ., concurred.
Exhibit 99.3 - Annual Statement of Compliance for the year
	       ended December 31, 2005


AURORA LOAN SERVICES
A Lehman Brothers Company


Via UPS

February 23, 2006


Diana Kenneally
U.S. Bank National Association
1 Federal Street, 3rd Floor
Boston, MA 02110

RE:	FFMLT 2005-FF3
	Annual Officer's Certificate as to Compliance

Dear Ms. Kenneally:

The undersigned Officer certifies the following for the period ending
on December 31, 2005:

1.	I have reviewed the activities and performance of the Master
Servicer during the preceding calendar year under the terms of the
Trust Agreements and to the best of this Officer's knowledge, the
Master Servicer has fulfilled all of its duties, responsibilities
or obligations under the Agreements;

2.	Based on said review and to the best of this Officer's knowledge,
the Master Servicer is not in default of its obligations under the terms
of the Trust Agreements in any material respect, or, if there is a default
in the fulfillment of its obligations, a description of each default or
failure and the nature and status thereof has been reported to this Officer;

3.	To the best of this Officer's knowledge, nothing has arose to lead
this Officer to believe that its Servicer has failed to perform any of its
duties, responsibilities and obligations under its Servicing Agreement during
the preceding calendar year;

4.	To the best of this Officer's knowledge, the Servicer is not in
default of its obligations under the terms of its Servicing Agreement in any
material respect, or, if there is a default in the fulfillment of its
obligations, a description of each default or failure and the nature and
status thereof has been reported to this Officer;

5.	The Master Servicer has received from its Servicer such Servicer's
annual certificate of compliance and a copy of such Servicer's annual audit
report, in each case to the extent required under the applicable Servicing
Agreement, or, if any such certificate or report has not been received by
the Master Servicer, the Master Servicer is using its best reasonable efforts
to obtain such certificate or report.


Certified By:


/s/ R. Peter Karr
R. Peter Karr
Senior Vice President
Master Servicing Division