alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**Exhibit 99.1**

[KPMG Letterhead] 

September 30, 2009 

Securities and Exchange Commission 

100 F Street,N.E. 

Washington, DC 20549 

Ladiesand Gentlemen: 

We were previously principal accountants for China Medical Technologies, Inc. and, under the date of June 27, 2008, wereported on the consolidated financial statements of China Medical Technologies, Inc. as of and for the years ended March 31, 2007 and 2008, and the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting as of March 31, 2008. In August2009, we were dismissed. We have read China Medical Technologies, Inc.’s statements included under Item 16F of its annual report on Form 20-F for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2009, and we agree with such statements containedtherein as they relate to KPMG, except that we are not in a position to agree or disagree with China Medical Technologies, Inc.’s stated reason for changing principal accountants. In addition, we are not in a position to agree or disagree withthe statements that: 1) the audit committee and board of directors resolved to engage PwC to serve as the independent registered public accounting firm in connection with the audit of China Medical Technologies, Inc.’s consolidated financialstatements for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2009; 2) the change was approved by the audit committee and board of directors; 3) PwC was not consulted concerning the application of accounting principles to a specific completed or contemplatedtransaction, or the type of audit opinion that might be rendered on China Medical Technologies, Inc.’s consolidated financial statements and no written or oral advice was provided by PwC that was an important factor considered by China MedicalTechnologies, Inc. in reaching a decision as to any accounting, auditing or financial reporting issue, or any matter that was either the subject of a disagreement with us or a “reportable event”; 4) China Medical Technologies, Inc.requested PwC to review the disclosures under Item 16F of its annual report on Form 20-F for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2009; and 5) PwC had no disagreement with the Item 16F disclosure and consequently declined to furnish ChinaMedical Technologies, Inc. with a letter. 

Very truly yours, 

/S/ KPMG
§ 404.1352 Benefits and payments based on deemed insured status. ( a ) *Our determination.* We determine your monthly benefit or lump-sum death payment under the deemed insured status provisions in §§ 404.1350 and 404.1351 regardless of whether the Veterans Administration has determined that any pension or compensation is payable to you.
( b ) *Certification for payment.* If we determine that you can be paid a monthly benefit or lump-sum death payment, we certify these benefits for payment. However, the amount of your monthly benefit or lump-sum death payment may be changed if we are informed by the Veterans Administration that a pension or compensation is payable because of the veteran's death as explained in § 404.1360.
( c ) *Payments not considered as pension or compensation.* We do not consider as pension or compensation— ( 1 ) National Service Life Insurance payments;
( 2 ) United States Government Life Insurance payments; or
( 3 ) Burial allowance payments made by the Veterans Administration.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

DAY ELEV

 948.65

 948.69

 948.68

 948.69

 948.64

 948.66

 948.76

 948.90

 949.35

 949.71

 949.76

 949.85

 949.97

 950.01

 950.10

 950.21

 950.21

 950.13

 950.02

 950.09

 950.16

 950.23

 950.32

 950.41

 950.34

 950.32

 950.44

 950.60

 1,045.5

 1,045.8

 1,045.7

 1,045.8

 1,045.4

 1,045.6

 1,046.3

 1,047.4

 1,050.7

 1,053.4

 1,053.7

 1,054.4

 1,055.3

 1,055.6

 1,056.3

 1,057.1

 1,057.1

 1,056.5

 1,055.7

 1,056.2

 1,056.7

 1,057.3

 1,057.9

 1,058.6

 1,058.1

 1,057.9

 1,058.8

 1,060.0

STORAGE

-0.1

+0.3

-0.1

+0.1

-0.4

+0.1

+0.7

+1.0

+3.3

+2.7

+0.4

+0.7

+0.9

+0.3

+0.7

+0.8

+0.0

-0.6

-0.8

+0.5

+0.5

+0.5

+0.7

+0.7

-0.5

-0.2

+0.9

+1.2

CHANGE

159

349

256

239

144

451

648

994

2,296

1,642

584

524

495

318

379

436

374

330

424

361

320

357

416

421

497

586

789

1,032

INFLOW

 212

 163

 284

 182

 324

 359

 267

 469

 599

 281

 389

 181

 14

 146

 16

 15

 352

 607

 816

 61

 42

 59

 46

 55

 742

 645

 327

 402

POWER

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

SPILL

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

OUTLET

 22

 36

 10

 19

 7

 17

 7

 2

 10

 10

 7

 5

 31

 22

 24

 7

 22

 24

 22

 36

 14

 34

 31

 27

 19

 17

 10

 27

C.F.S.

 .09

 .15

 .04

 .08

 .03

 .07

 .03

 .01

 .04

 .04

 .03

 .02

 .13

 .09

 .10

 .03

 .09

 .10

 .09

 .15

 .06

 .14

 .13

 .11

 .08

 .07

 .04

 .11

INCHES

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .12

 .05

 .70

 1.51

 1.75

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .12

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 1.15

 .23

PRECIP

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

FEBRUARY 2014 NEW MELONES LAKE DAILY OPERATIONS RUN DATE: April 25, 2014

IN LAKE

EVAPORATION

INCHES

C.F.S.

COMPUTED*

1000 ACRE-FEET

RELEASE - C.F.S.

TOTALS +14.3 15,821 8,055 0 0 519 2.15 5.63

ACRE-FEET +14,300 31,381 15,977 0 0 1,029

COMMENTS:

* COMPUTED INFLOW IS THE SUM OF CHANGE IN STORAGE, RELEASES AND EVAPORATION.

SUMMARY

RELEASE (ACRE-FEET)

POWER 15,977

SPILL 0

OUTLET

TOTAL

 0

 15,977

PRECIPITATION

THIS MONTH =

TO DATE =

 5.63

JULY 1, 2013 9.40

 1,045.6

Table 13
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY HIGH

 186

 181

 184

 183

 184

 181

 179

 178

 174

 175

 174

 177

 181

 181

 182

 184

 183

 186

 181

 179

 181

 171

 177

 182

 183

 183

 183

 183

 182

 183

 183

 170

 168

 163

 164

 166

 168

 171

 169

 166

 164

 164

 165

 169

 173

 173

 172

 169

 173

 174

 173

 166

 163

 158

 162

 171

 176

 176

 176

 177

 172

 175

 174

 173

 171

 170

 172

 172

 173

 173

 170

 168

 168

 170

 173

 176

 177

 176

 175

 176

 176

 175

 173

 167

 166

 174

 178

 178

 178

 178

 179

 178

 179

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

MAY 2002 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: June 5, 2002

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

RIO VISTA ON THE SACRAMENTO RIVER
I 

114TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 3935 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to terminate the deferral 

of active income of controlled foreign corporations. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

NOVEMBER 5, 2015 

Mr. POCAN (for himself, Ms. NORTON, Mr. GARAMENDI, Ms. LEE, Mr. ELLISON, and Mr. NADLER) introduced the following bill; which was referred 

to the Committee on Ways and Means 

A BILL 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to terminate 

the deferral of active income of controlled foreign corporations. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Putting America First 

5 Corporate Tax Act’’. 


SSpencer on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 3935 IH

1 SEC. 2. TERMINATION OF DEFERRAL OF ACTIVE INCOME 

2 OF CONTROLLED FOREIGN CORPORATIONS. 

3 (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 952 of the Internal Rev4 enue Code of 1986 is amended by adding at the end the 

5 following new subsection: 

6 ‘‘(e) SPECIAL APPLICATION OF SUBPART.— 

7 ‘‘(1) IN GENERAL.—For taxable years begin8 ning after December 31, 2015, notwithstanding any 

9 other provision of this subpart, the term ‘subpart F 

10 income’ means, in the case of any controlled foreign 

11 corporation, the income of such corporation derived 

12 from any foreign country. 

13 ‘‘(2) APPLICABLE RULES.—Rules similar to the 

14 rules under the last sentence of subsection (a) and 

15 subsection (d) shall apply to this subsection.’’. 

16 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

17 subsection (a) shall apply to taxable years beginning after 

18 December 31, 2015. 

Æ 


SSpencer on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
### §2321d. Considerations in furnishing military assistance

Decisions to furnish military assistance made under subchapter II of this chapter shall take into account whether such assistance will—

(1) contribute to an arms race;

(2) increase the possibility of outbreak or escalation of conflict; or

(3) prejudice the development of bilateral or multilateral arms control arrangements.

(Pub. L. 87–195, pt. II, §511, as added Pub. L. 92–226, pt. II, §201(f), Feb. 7, 1972, 86 Stat. 25; amended Pub. L. 94–141, title I, §150(c), Nov. 29, 1975, 89 Stat. 760; Pub. L. 105–277, div. G, subdiv. A, title XII, §1225(b), Oct. 21, 1998, 112 Stat. 2681–773.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

1998—Pub. L. 105–277 substituted "take into account" for "be made in coordination with the Director of the United States Arms Control and Disarmament Agency and shall take into account his opinion as to" in introductory provisions.

1975—Pub. L. 94–141 substituted "be made in coordination with the Director of the United States Arms Control and Disarmament Agency and shall take into account his opinion as to" for "take into account".

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### References to Subchapter II Deemed To Exclude Certain Parts of Subchapter II

References to subchapter II of this chapter are deemed to exclude parts IV (§2346 et seq.), VI (§2348 et seq.), and VIII (§2349aa et seq.) of subchapter II, and references to subchapter I of this chapter are deemed to include such parts. See section 202(b) of Pub. L. 92–226, set out as a note under section 2346 of this title, and sections 2348c and 2349aa–5 of this title.

#### Effective Date of 1998 Amendment

Amendment by Pub. L. 105–277 effective Apr. 1, 1999, see section 1201 of Pub. L. 105–277, set out as an Effective Date note under section 6511 of this title.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

DAY

 39,753

 39,350

 38,925

 38,483

 38,153

 37,847

 37,706

 37,289

 37,018

 36,759

 36,316

 36,380

 36,331

 36,268

 35,877

 35,449

 35,109

 34,708

 34,304

 34,117

 33,880

 33,461

 33,229

 33,105

 40,634

 32,496

 32,055

 31,606

 31,175

 30,696

 55,539

 54,966

 54,378

 53,837

 53,123

 52,575

 51,759

 51,245

 50,547

 49,847

 49,135

 48,260

 47,358

 46,473

 45,924

 45,393

 44,768

 44,241

 43,738

 42,972

 42,290

 41,817

 41,433

 41,020

 32,952

 40,166

 39,685

 39,125

 38,722

 38,318

STORAGE - A.F. 

 95,292

 94,316

 93,303

 92,320

 91,276

 90,422

 89,465

 88,534

 87,565

 86,606

 85,451

 84,640

 83,689

 82,741

 81,801

 80,842

 79,877

 78,949

 78,042

 77,089

 76,170

 75,278

 74,662

 74,125

 73,586

 72,662

 71,740

 70,731

 69,897

 69,014

768

720

831

878

826

808

775

727

680

875

711

695

736

733

764

797

620

668

660

683

635

748

586

559

554

829

787

778

641

874

293

228

320

382

300

377

293

258

191

392

129

286

257

255

290

314

133

200

203

203

172

298

275

288

282

363

322

269

221

429

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

SEPTEMBER 2008 FULL NATURAL FLOW AT NEW MELONES DAM RUN DATE: 10/01/2008

TOTALS -27,220 8,223

* October 1, 16,310

 562.7

 563.2

 563.8

 564.6

 565.2

 565.9

 566.5

 567.0

 567.4

 568.2

 568.4

 569.0

 569.5

 570.0

 570.6

 571.2

 571.5

 571.9

 572.3

 572.7

 573.0

 573.6

 574.2

 574.7

 575.3

 576.0

 576.6

 577.2

 577.6

 578.5

DONNELLS

RES

BEARDSLEY

RES

2007 TO DATE

NEW

MELONES

INFLOW

C.F.S

NATURAL

RIVER

C.F.S

ACCUM *

FULL

NATURAL

1000 A.F.

RESERVOIR

TOTAL

-942

-976

-1,013

-983

-1,044

-854

-957

-931

-969

-959

-1,155

-811

-951

-948

-940

-959

-965

-928

-907

-953

-919

-892

-616

-537

-539

-924

-922

-1,009

-834

-883

CHANGE

A.F. C.F.S.

-475

-492

-511

-496

-526

-431

-482

-469

-489

-483

-582

-409

-479

-478

-474

-483

-487

-468

-457

-480

-463

-450

-311

-271

-272

-466

-465

-509

-420

-445
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

DAY ELEVATION

 239.05

 238.86

 238.83

 238.82

 238.73

 238.74

 238.69

 238.62

 239.07

 239.60

 239.68

 239.65

 239.67

 239.95

 239.95

 239.82

 239.87

 242.04

 240.39

 240.69

 240.39

 240.16

 240.21

 240.17

 240.10

 240.00

 239.90

 239.87

 239.88

 239.97

 356

 336

 333

 332

 322

 323

 318

 311

 358

 422

 432

 428

 430

 464

 464

 448

 454

 770

 524

 565

 524

 492

 499

 493

 484

 470

 458

 454

 456

 466

STORAGE

-12

-20

-3

-10

+1

-5

-7

+47

+64

+10

-4

+2

+34

+0

-16

+6

+316

-246

+41

-41

-32

+7

-6

-9

-14

-12

-4

+2

+10

CHANGE

 129

 157

 248

 341

 298

 368

 347

 330

 336

 343

 318

 323

 305

 355

 256

 244

 123

 0

 0

 0

 103

 141

 146

 145

 139

 301

 382

 366

 368

 324

 9,274

 9,016

 9,009

 8,902

 8,841

 8,964

 8,792

 8,542

 9,702

 9,984

 9,901

 9,845

 10,316

 10,942

 10,642

 10,512

 10,996

 10,876

 13,142

 14,212

 12,107

 13,136

 13,006

 12,761

 11,027

 11,001

 10,906

 10,814

 10,817

 10,996

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

APRIL 2000 RED BLUFF DIVERSION RESERVOIR DAILY OPERATIONS RUN DATE: May 2, 2000

IN LAKE

CANAL

 ACRE-FEET

TOTALS +99 7,236 318,981

ACRE-FEET +99 14,353 632,699

SUMMARY

RELEASE (ACRE-FEET)

TOTAL 648,016

 368

RELEASE

RIVER

CORNING TO SACTO

CANAL

RELEASE C.F.S

TEHAMA

COLUSA

 17

 21

 15

 15

 31

 37

 20

 30

 21

 23

 37

 50

 43

 20

 7

 18

 6

 0

 7

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 11

 0

 12

 17

 28

 486

 964

CORNING CANAL 964

TEHAMA-COLUSA CANAL 14,353

TO SACTO RIVER 632,699

Table 9
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of the Treasury

###### Office of Thrift Supervision

                    Notice is hereby given that, pursuant to the authority contained in section                           ( print page 22945)                        5(d)(2) of the Home Owners' Loan Act, The Office of Thrift Supervision has duly appointed the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation as sole Receiver for Superior Bank, Birmingham, Alabama, (OTS No. 18010) on April 15, 2011.                

Dated: April 18, 2011.

By the Office of Thrift Supervision.

Sandra E. Evans,

Federal Register Liaison.

[FR Doc. 2011-9735 Filed 4-22-11; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6720-01-M
#### Joel Claster v. Charles Laubheim et al.

Present—Martin, P. J., Townley, Untermyer, Cohn and Callahan, JJ.
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff—Appellee, v. Leroy David JONES, a/k/a Fats, Defendant—Appellant.

No. 05-7933.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: July 12, 2006.

Decided: July 20, 2006.

Leroy David Jones, Appellant Pro Se. John Francis Purcell, Jr., Office of the United States Attorney, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellee.

Before WILKINSON, WILLIAMS, and KING, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).

PER CURIAM:

Leroy David Jones seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying his Fed. R. Civ.P. 60(b) motion for reconsideration of the district court’s order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (2000) motion. The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1) (2000); *Reid v. Angelone,*369 F.3d 363, 369 (4th Cir.2004). A certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2000). A prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that any assessment of the constitutional claims by the district court is debatable or wrong and that any dispositive procedural ruling by the district court is likewise debatable. *Miller-El v. Cockrell,*537 U.S. 322, 336-38, 123 S.Ct. 1029, 154 L.Ed.2d 931 (2003); *Slack v. McDaniel,*529 U.S. 473, 484, 120 S. Ct. 1595, 146 L.Ed.2d 542 (2000); *Rose v. Lee,*252 F.3d 676, 683-84 (4th Cir.2001). We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Jones has not made the requisite showing.

*226Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. We further deny Jones’ request for the entry of a default judgment in his favor and for the production of certain documents. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*DISMISSED.*
### TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

JUDGMENT RENDERED JU NE 29, 2018

NO. 03

- 18

- 00289

- CR

Santos V. Loa, Appellant

v.

The State of Texas, Appellee

APPEAL FROM THE 26TH DISTRICT COURT OF WILLIAMSON COUNTY
BEFORE JUSTICES PURYEAR, PE MBE RTON, AND BOURLAND
DISMISSED FOR WANT OF JURISDICTION

— OPINION BY JUSTICE PEMBERTON

This is an appeal from the judgment of conviction rend ered by the district court. Having

reviewed the record, i t appears that the Court lacks jurisdiction over this appeal. Therefore, the

Court dismisses the appeal for want of jurisdiction

. Because appellant is indigent and unable to

pay costs, no adjudication of costs is made.

### TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

JUDGMENT RENDERED JU NE 29, 2018

NO. 03

- 18

- 00290

- CR

Santos V. Loa, Appellant

v.

The State of Texas, Appellee

APPEAL FROM THE 26TH DISTRICT COURT OF WILLIAMSON COUNTY
BEFORE JUSTICES PURYEAR, PE MBE RTON, AND BOURLAND
DISMISSED FOR WANT OF JURISDICTION

— OPINION BY JUSTICE PEMBERTON

This is an appeal from the judgment of conviction rend ered by the district court. Having

reviewed the record, i t appears that the Court lacks jurisdiction over this appeal. Therefore, the

Court dismisses the appeal for want of jurisdiction

. Because appellant is indigent and unable to

pay costs, no adjudication of costs is made.
### §10225. Sunset

#### (a) In general

The authority to impose sanctions and the sanctions imposed under this subchapter shall terminate on the date that is 8 years after December 23, 2022.

#### (b) Certification for early sunset of sanctions

Sanctions imposed under this subchapter may be removed before the date specified in subsection (a), if the President submits to the appropriate congressional committees a certification that—

(1) the Burmese military has released all political prisoners taken into custody on or after February 1, 2021, or is providing legal recourse to those that remain in custody;

(2) the elected government of Burma has been reinstated or new free and fair elections have been held;

(3) all legal charges against those winning election in November 2020 are dropped; and

(4) the 2008 constitution of Burma has been amended or replaced to place the Burmese military under civilian oversight and ensure that the Burmese military no longer automatically receives 25 percent of seats in Burma's state, regional, and national Hluttaws.

#### (c) Notification for early sunset of sanctions on individuals

#### (1) In general

The President may terminate the application of sanctions under this subchapter with respect to specific individuals if the President submits to the appropriate congressional committees—

(A) a notice of and justification for the termination; and

(B) a notice that the individual is not engaging in the activity or is no longer occupying the position that was the basis for the sanctions or has taken significant verifiable steps toward stopping the activity.

#### (2) Form

The notice required by paragraph (1) shall be submitted in unclassified form but may include a classified annex.

(Pub. L. 117–263, div. E, title LV, §5574, Dec. 23, 2022, 136 Stat. 3368.)
#### In the Matter of the Accounting of Bank of New York, as Trustee under the Will of Cleveland H. Dodge, Deceased. Joseph V. McKee, as Special Guardian for John Rea et al., Infants, Appellant; Bank of New York, as Trustee, et al., Respondents.

No opinion. Present — Martin, P. J., Townley, Untermyer, Dore and Cohn, JJ.
#### § 349.3 Change of legal interpretation or administrative ruling.

A change of legal interpretation or administrative ruling upon which a decision is based does not render a decision erroneous and does not provide a basis for reopening.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

DAY ELEVATION

 238.73

 238.66

 238.59

 238.51

 238.53

 238.58

 238.57

 238.53

 238.44

 238.45

 238.50

 238.60

 238.76

 238.74

 238.54

 238.41

 238.34

 238.33

 238.31

 238.30

 238.31

 238.34

 238.99

 239.14

 239.93

 238.89

 238.64

 238.46

 239.09

 239.65

 322

 315

 308

 300

 302

 307

 306

 302

 293

 294

 299

 309

 326

 323

 303

 290

 283

 282

 280

 279

 280

 283

 349

 367

 462

 339

 313

 295

 361

 428

STORAGE

-3

-7

-7

-8

+2

+5

-1

-4

-9

+1

+5

+10

+17

-3

-20

-13

-7

-1

-2

-1

+1

+3

+66

+18

+95

-123

-26

-18

+66

+67

CHANGE

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 25

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 7,943

 7,581

 7,462

 7,294

 7,338

 7,474

 7,219

 7,085

 7,090

 7,105

 7,217

 7,481

 9,114

 7,836

 7,183

 6,941

 6,802

 6,498

 6,432

 6,428

 6,444

 6,571

 5,988

 7,617

 13,696

 9,770

 7,982

 7,174

 12,639

 12,243

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

NOVEMBER 2001 RED BLUFF DIVERSION RESERVOIR DAILY OPERATIONS RUN DATE: December 14, 2001

IN LAKE

CANAL

 ACRE-FEET

TOTALS +103 25 235,647

ACRE-FEET +103 50 467,406

SUMMARY

RELEASE (ACRE-FEET)

TOTAL 467,849

 325

RELEASE

RIVER

CORNING TO SACTO

CANAL

RELEASE C.F.S

TEHAMA

COLUSA

 15

 15

 29

 0

 0

 21

 0

 35

 0

 18

 0

 0

 0

 15

 0

 0

 12

 0

 0

 13

 0

 25

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 198

 393

CORNING CANAL 393

TEHAMA-COLUSA CANAL 50

TO SACTO RIVER 467,406

Table 9