Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 78 / Friday, April 22, 2011 / Notices 22739 

1Notice of the United States Postal Service of 

Market Test of Experimental Product—Mail Works 

Guarantee, April 15, 2011 (Notice). 

2Among the group of companies that spend $250 

million annually on advertising, postage represents 

less than 0.36 percent of total advertising spending. 

Day Event/activity 

25 ....................... If NRC staff finds no ‘‘need’’ or no likelihood of standing, the deadline for petitioner/requester to file a motion seeking a ruling 

to reverse the NRC staff’s denial of access; NRC staff files copy of access determination with the presiding officer (or Chief 

Administrative Judge or other designated officer, as appropriate). If NRC staff finds ‘‘need’’ for SUNSI, the deadline for any 

party to the proceeding whose interest independent of the proceeding would be harmed by the release of the information 

to file a motion seeking a ruling to reverse the NRC staff’s grant of access. 

80 ....................... Deadline for NRC staff reply to motions to reverse NRC staff determination(s). 

90 ....................... (Receipt +30) If NRC staff finds standing and need for SUNSI, deadline for NRC staff to complete information processing and 

file motion for Protective Order and draft Non-Disclosure Affidavit. Deadline for applicant/licensee to file Non-Disclosure 

Agreement for SUNSI. 

A ........................ If access granted: Issuance of presiding officer or other designated officer decision on motion for protective order for access 

to sensitive information (including schedule for providing access and submission of contentions) or decision reversing a 

final adverse determination by the NRC staff. 

A + 3 .................. Deadline for filing executed Non-Disclosure Affidavits. Access provided to SUNSI consistent with decision issuing the protective order. 

A + 28 ................ Deadline for submission of contentions whose development depends upon access to SUNSI. However, if more than 25 days 

remain between the petitioner’s receipt of (or access to) the information and the deadline for filing all other contentions (as

established in the notice of hearing or opportunity for hearing), the petitioner may file its SUNSI contentions by that later 

deadline. 

A + 53 ................ (Contention receipt +25) Answers to contentions whose development depends upon access to SUNSI. 

A 60 ................... (Answer receipt +7) Petitioner/Intervenor reply to answers. 

> A + 60 ............. Decision on contention admission. 

[FR Doc. 2011–9831 Filed 4–21–11; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 7590–01–P 

POSTAL REGULATORY COMMISSION 

[Docket No. MT2011–4; Order No. 717] 

Postal Service Market Test 

AGENCY: Postal Regulatory Commission. 

ACTION: Notice. 

SUMMARY: The Commission is noticing a 

recently-filed Postal Service proposal to 

conduct a limited market test involving 

a postage-refund guarantee for certain 

senders of First-Class Mail and Standard 

Mail. This document describes the 

proposed test, addresses procedural 

aspects of the filing, and invites public 

comment. 

DATES: Comment deadline: April 29, 

2011; reply comment deadline: May 6, 

2011. 

ADDRESSES: Submit comments 

electronically via the Commission’s 

Filing Online system at http:// 

www.prc.gov. Those who cannot submit 

comments electronically should contact 

the person identified in the FOR FURTHER

INFORMATION CONTACT section by 

telephone for advice on filing 

alternatives. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Stephen L. Sharfman, General Counsel, 

202–789–6820 or 

stephen.sharfman@prc.gov. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Background. On April 15, 2011, the 

Postal Service filed a Notice, pursuant 

to 39 U.S.C. 3641, announcing its intent 

to conduct a test of an experimental 

market dominant product identified as 

Mail Works Guarantee.1 The Postal 

Service asserts that the test offers the 

potential for it to tap a greater share of 

advertising media expenditures, while 

offering participating mailers the 

possibility of postage refunds if 

qualifying advertising campaigns 

(consisting of First-Class or Standard 

Mail) are not successful. Id. at 1. 

Terms duration. The test will initially 

be offered to 16 companies who spend 

at least $250 million annually on 

advertising, but do not include mail as 

a large part of their advertising mix.2 Id. 

at 1. The test may be expanded to 

include more mailers. Id. at 7. The 

Postal Service and each participant will 

jointly develop a set of unique metrics 

for purposes of evaluating the success of 

a test Direct Mail campaign, along with 

a mutually agreed upon percentage 

increase in the unique metric that will 

serve as the basis for determining a 

campaign’s success. Id. at 2. Each 

participant will be expected to mail a 

minimum of 500,000 pieces up to a 

maximum of 1 million pieces of FirstClass Mail or Standard Mail. Id. The test 

will begin on or shortly after May 16, 

2011 and continue for up to 2 years. Id. 

at 6. 

Refunds. In the event a campaign does 

not meet established metrics, as verified 

by a Postal Service representative, the 

Postal Service will provide a refund of 

postage paid during the market test, up 

to a total of $250,000, in the form of a 

credit to the appropriate Centralized 

Account Payment System account. 

Production and printing costs for the 

campaign are not refundable. Id. at 

2–3. 

Consistency with statutory criteria. 

The Notice addresses why the Postal 

Service believes the market test satisfies 

the section 3461 criteria for market tests, 

including why it is a significantly 

different product and is unlikely to 

cause disruption within the advertising 

mail market. Id. at 3–5. It also discusses 

why the Postal Service believes the test 

complies with 39 U.S.C. 403, which 

prohibits undue discrimination against 

(or an undue preference for) any mailer 

and is correctly characterized as a 

market dominant product. Id. at 5. 

Volume and revenue; data collection. 

Exact volumes and revenues for Mail 

Works Guarantee will depend on 

customer participation and the amount 

of mail each customer enters under the 

test. At a maximum, the Postal Service 

anticipates that the test, as currently 

structured, can generate no more than 

16 million new pieces and therefore no 

more than $10,000,000 in any fiscal 

year. Id. at 6. The Postal Service has 

prepared a data collection plan and says 

it can report the results to the 

Commission upon request. Id. 

Docket information. The Commission 

establishes Docket No. MT2011–4 for 

consideration of matters this Notice 

raises. It encourages interested persons 

to review the Notice for additional 

details. It also invites interested persons 

to submit comments on whether the 

Postal Service’s filing in the captioned 

docket is consistent with the policies of 

39 U.S.C. 3641. Comments are due no 

later than April 29, 2011. Reply 

comments are due no later than May 6, 

2011. The filing can be accessed via the 

Commission’s Web site (http:// 

mstockstill on DSKH9S0YB1PROD with NOTICES

22740 Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 78 / Friday, April 22, 2011 / Notices 

www.prc.gov). The Commission 

encourages interested persons to review 

the Notice in its entirety. 

The Commission appoints Kenneth E. 

Richardson to serve as Public 

Representative in this docket. 

It is ordered: 

1. The Commission establishes Docket 

No. MT2011–4 for consideration of the 

matters raised in this Notice. 

2. Pursuant to 39 U.S.C. 505, Kenneth 

E. Richardson is appointed to serve as 

officer of the Commission (Public 

Representative) to represent the 

interests of the general public in this 

proceeding. 

3. Comments by interested persons 

are due no later than April 29, 2011. 

4. Reply comments are due no later 

than May 6, 2011. 

5. The Secretary shall arrange for 

publication of this order in the Federal 

Register. 

By the Commission. 

Ruth Ann Abrams, 

Acting Secretary. 

[FR Doc. 2011–9819 Filed 4–21–11; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 7710–FW–P 

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE 

COMMISSION 

Proposed Collection; Comment 

Request 

Upon Written Request, Copies Available 

From: U.S. Securities and Exchange 

Commission, Office of Investor 

Education and Advocacy, 

Washington, DC 20549–0213. 

Corrected Extension: 

Rule 19b–4 and Form 19b–4; OMB Control 

No. 3235–0045; SEC File No. 270–38. 

Notice is hereby given that pursuant 

to the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 

(44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.), the Securities 

and Exchange Commission 

(‘‘Commission’’) is soliciting comments 

on the collection of information 

summarized below. The Commission 

plans to submit this existing collection 

of information to the Office of 

Management and Budget for extension 

and approval. 

1. Rule 19b–4 (17 CFR 240.19b–4) and 

Form 19b–4—Filings with respect to 

proposed rule changes by self-regulatory 

organizations. 

Section 19(b) of the Securities 

Exchange Act of 1934 (‘‘Act’’) (15 U.S.C. 

78s(b)) requires each self-regulatory 

organization (‘‘SRO’’) to file with the 

Commission copies of any proposed 

rule, or any proposed change in, 

addition to, or deletion from the rules of 

such SRO. Rule 19b–4 (17 CFR 240.19b– 

4) implements the requirements of 

Section 19(b) by requiring the SROs to 

file their proposed rule changes on 

Form 19b–4 and by clarifying which 

actions taken by SROs are deemed 

proposed rule changes and so must be 

filed pursuant to Section 19(b). 

The collection of information is 

designed to provide the Commission 

with the information necessary to 

determine, as required by the Act, 

whether the proposed rule change is 

consistent with the Act and the rules 

thereunder. The information is used to 

determine if the proposed rule change 

should be approved, disapproved, or if 

proceedings should be instituted to 

determine whether the proposed rule 

change should be approved or 

disapproved. 

The respondents to the collection of 

information are self-regulatory 

organizations (as defined by the Act), 

including national securities exchanges, 

national securities associations, 

registered clearing agencies and the 

Municipal Securities Rulemaking Board. 

Twenty-five respondents file an 

average total of 1,405 responses per 

year. Each response takes approximately 

38.057 hours to complete. The total 

annual reporting burden for filing 

proposed rule changes is 53,470 hours. 

The respondents are required to post all 

proposed rule changes to their Web 

sites, each of which takes approximately 

four hours to complete. For 1,405 

proposed rule changes, the total annual 

reporting burden for posting them to 

respondents’ Web sites is 5,620 hours. 

The respondents are required to update 

the postings of those proposed rule 

changes which become effective (on 

average, 1,071 per year), each of which 

takes approximately four hours to 

complete. The total annual reporting 

burden for updating proposed rule 

change postings on the respondents’ 

Web sites is 4,284 hours. Thus, the total 

estimated annual response burden 

pursuant to Rule 19b–4 and Form 19b– 

4 is the sum of the total annual 

reporting burdens for filing proposed 

rule changes, posting them to the 

respondents’ Web sites, and updating 

the postings of those that become 

effective on the respondents’, which is 

63,374 hours. 

Compliance with Rule 19b–4 is 

mandatory. Information received in 

response to Rule 19b–4 shall not be kept 

confidential; the information collected 

is public information. 

Written comments are invited on: (a) 

Whether the proposed collection of 

information is necessary for the proper 

performance of the functions of the 

Commission, including whether the 

information shall have practical utility; 

(b) the accuracy of the Commission’s 

estimates of the burden of the proposed 

collection of information; (c) ways to 

enhance the quality, utility, and clarity 

of the information to be collected; and 

(d) ways to minimize the burden of the 

collection of information on 

respondents, including through the use 

of automated collection techniques or 

other forms of information technology. 

Consideration will be given to 

comments and suggestions submitted in 

writing within 60 days of this 

publication. 

Please direct your comments to: 

Thomas Bayer, Chief Information 

Officer, Securities and Exchange 

Commission, c/o Remi Pavlik-Simon, 

6432 General Green Way, Alexandria, 

Virginia 22312 or send an e-mail to: 

PRA_Mailbox@sec.gov. 

Dated: April 14, 2011. 

Cathy H. Ahn, 

Deputy Secretary. 

[FR Doc. 2011–9775 Filed 4–21–11; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 8011–01–P 

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE 

COMMISSION 

[Release No. 34–64306; File No. 4–626] 

Comment Request on Existing Private 

and Public Efforts To Educate 

Investors 

AGENCY: Securities and Exchange 

Commission. 

ACTION: Request for comment. 

SUMMARY: In connection with a study 

regarding financial literacy among 

investors as mandated by the DoddFrank Wall Street Reform and Consumer 

Protection Act of 2010 (the ‘‘Dodd-Frank 

Act’’), the Securities and Exchange 

Commission is requesting public 

comment on the effectiveness of existing 

private and public efforts to educate 

investors. 

DATES: Comments should be received on 

or before June 21, 2011. 

ADDRESSES: Comments may be 

submitted by any of the following 

methods: 

Electronic Comments 

• Use the Commission’s Internet 

comment form (http://www.sec.gov/ 

rules/other.shtml); or 

• Send an e-mail to rulecomments@sec.gov. Please include File 

Number 4–626 on the subject line. 

Paper Comments 

• Send paper comments in triplicate 

to Elizabeth M. Murphy, Secretary, 

Securities and Exchange Commission, 

100 F Street, NE., Washington, DC 

mstockstill on DSKH9S0YB1PROD with NOTICES