alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
### §2347a. Authorization of appropriations

There are authorized to be appropriated to the President to carry out the purposes of this part $56,221,000 for fiscal year 1986 and $56,221,000 for fiscal year 1987.

(Pub. L. 87–195, pt. II, §542, as added Pub. L. 94–329, title I, §106(a), June 30, 1976, 90 Stat. 732; amended Pub. L. 95–92, §10, Aug. 4, 1977, 91 Stat. 619; Pub. L. 95–384, §11(a), Sept. 26, 1978, 92 Stat. 736; Pub. L. 96–92, §9, Oct. 29, 1979, 93 Stat. 705; Pub. L. 96–533, title I, §115(a), Dec. 16, 1980, 94 Stat. 3140; Pub. L. 97–113, title I, §113, title VII, §734(a)(1), Dec. 29, 1981, 95 Stat. 1528, 1560; Pub. L. 99–83, title I, §104, Aug. 8, 1985, 99 Stat. 195.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

1985—Pub. L. 99–83 amended section generally, substituting provisions authorizing appropriations of $56,221,000 for fiscal years 1986 and 1987, for provisions authorizing appropriations of $42,000,000 for fiscal years 1982 and 1983.

1981—Pub. L. 97–113, §§113, 734(a)(1), substituted appropriations authorization of $42,000,000 for fiscal years 1982 and 1983 for appropriation of $34,000,000 for fiscal year 1981 and deleted prohibition against any training after June 30, 1976, outside the United States without a prior Presidential report to the Speaker of the House and the Senate Foreign Relations Committee and justification for the training.

1980—Pub. L. 96–533 substituted appropriations authorization of $34,000,000 for fiscal year 1981 for authorization of $31,800,000 for fiscal year 1980, including prohibition against availability of any amount for Inter-American regional programs unless the foreign country participants collectively contribute an equivalent amount to carry out the programs.

1979—Pub. L. 96–92 substituted appropriations authorization of $31,800,000 for fiscal year 1980, for identical authorization for fiscal year 1979, and required collective contribution of an equivalent amount by the foreign countries participating in Inter-American regional programs before such amount became available from the appropriation for such programs.

1978—Pub. L. 95–384 substituted "$31,800,000 for the fiscal year 1979" for "$31,000,000 for the fiscal year 1978".

1977—Pub. L. 95–92 substituted "$31,000,000 for the fiscal year 1978" for "$27,000,000 for the fiscal year 1976 and $30,200,000 for the fiscal year 1977".

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date of 1985 Amendment

Amendment by Pub. L. 99–83 effective Oct. 1, 1985, see section 1301 of Pub. L. 99–83, set out as a note under section 2151–1 of this title.

#### **Executive Documents**

#### Delegation of Functions

For delegation of functions of President under this section, see Ex. Ord. No. 12163, Sept. 29, 1979, 44 F.R. 56673, as amended, set out as a note under section 2381 of this title.
I 

114TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 4049 

To amend the Bank Holding Company Act of 1956 to exempt certain nonfinancial companies and smaller banking entities from the application 

of the Volcker Rule. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

NOVEMBER 17, 2015 

Mrs. LOVE (for herself, Mr. NEUGEBAUER, and Mr. HUIZENGA of Michigan) 

introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Financial Services 

A BILL 

To amend the Bank Holding Company Act of 1956 to exempt certain non-financial companies and smaller banking entities from the application of the Volcker Rule. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Volcker Rule Relief 

5 Act of 2105’’. 

6 SEC. 2. TREATMENT OF CERTAIN NON-FINANCIAL COMPA7 NIES. 

8 Section 13(h)(1) of the Bank Holding Company Act 

9 of 1956 (12 U.S.C. 1851(h)(1)) is amended— 


smartinez on DSK4TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 4049 IH

1 (1) in subparagraph (D), by redesignating 

2 clauses (i) and (ii) as subclauses (I) and (II), respec3 tively, and moving such subclauses 2 ems to the 

4 right; 

5 (2) by redesignating subparagraphs (A), (B), 

6 (C), and (D) as clauses (i), (ii), (iii), and (iv), re7 spectively, and moving such clauses 2 ems to the 

8 right; 

9 (3) by striking ‘‘The term’’ and inserting the 

10 following: 

11 ‘‘(A) IN GENERAL.—The term’’; and 

12 (4) by adding at the end the following: 

13 ‘‘(B) CERTAIN NON-FINANCIAL COMPA14 NIES.—Notwithstanding subparagraph (A), the 

15 term ‘banking entity’ does not include any enti16 ty that— 

17 ‘‘(i)(I) is not predominantly engaged 

18 in financial activities, as defined under sec19 tion 102 of the Financial Stability Act of 

20 2010 (12 U.S.C. 5311); 

21 ‘‘(II) is not a bank holding company 

22 or a nonbank financial company supervised 

23 by the Board; and 

24 ‘‘(III) is not a direct or indirect sub25 sidiary of a bank holding company or a 


smartinez on DSK4TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
3 

•HR 4049 IH

1 nonbank financial company supervised by 

2 the Board; or 

3 ‘‘(ii) would be a banking entity solely 

4 due to its control of an entity described 

5 under clause (i).’’. 

6 SEC. 3. EXEMPTION FOR SMALLER BANKING ENTITIES. 

7 Section 13 of the Bank Holding Company Act of 

8 1956 (12 U.S.C. 1851) is amended by adding at the end 

9 the following: 

10 ‘‘(i) EXEMPTION FOR SMALLER BANKING ENTI11 TIES.—This section shall not apply to a banking entity 

12 with total consolidated assets of $10,000,000,000 or 

13 less.’’. 

Æ 


smartinez on DSK4TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
#### Roy Miner, Appellant, v. O’Driscoll *&*Grove, Inc., Respondent, et al., Defendants.

Judgment and order unanimously affirmed, with costs. No opinion. Present — Peck, P. J., Dore, Cohn, Callahan and Shientag, JJ. [See *post,*p. 846.]
### §123. Repealed. Feb. 23, 1931, ch. 276, §22, 46 Stat. 1210, eff. July 1, 1931

Section, R.S. §1742, related to salary during absence.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

DAY HIGH

 102

 101

 104

 98

 115

 108

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 115

 110

 108

 109

 109

 113

 115

 115

 111

 111

 108

 102

 96

 80

 89

 96

 101

 100

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 109

 108

 102

 102

 106

 110

 112

 106

 106

 107

 102

 100

 99

 90

 98

 97

 110

 104

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 112

 109

 106

 106

 107

 112

 114

 111

 109

 109

 104

 101

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

FEBRUARY 2019 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: March 1, 2019

HIGH LOW MEAN

 54.9

 54.9

 53.7

 53.1

 52.0

 51.0

 0.0

 0.0

 0.0

 0.0

 0.0

 0.0

 0.0

 0.0

 0.0

 0.0

 51.0

 50.5

 50.6

 51.2

 51.6

 51.0

 50.7

 52.0

 52.3

 51.9

 52.8

 52.8

 53.8

 53.8

 52.9

 52.1

 51.0

 49.7

 0.0

 0.0

 0.0

 0.0

 0.0

 0.0

 0.0

 0.0

 0.0

 0.0

 50.3

 49.4

 49.3

 49.9

 50.4

 49.7

 49.3

 50.4

 51.6

 51.6

 51.4

 52.2

 54.4

 54.4

 53.3

 52.7

 51.5

 50.2

 0.0

 0.0

 0.0

 0.0

 0.0

 0.0

 0.0

 0.0

 0.0

 0.0

 50.6

 50.0

 49.9

 50.5

 50.9

 50.3

 50.1

 51.2

 51.9

 51.8

 52.1

 52.5

HIGH LOW MEAN

 10.6

 10.3

 10.3

 10.2

 10.2

 10.2

 0.0

 0.0

 0.0

 0.0

 0.0

 0.0

 0.0

 0.0

 0.0

 0.0

 11.1

 11.3

 11.4

 11.4

 11.2

 11.3

 11.5

 11.4

 11.3

 11.1

 11.1

 11.2

 9.9

 10.0

 9.8

 9.9

 9.8

 9.9

 0.0

 0.0

 0.0

 0.0

 0.0

 0.0

 0.0

 0.0

 0.0

 0.0

 10.9

 11.1

 11.3

 11.1

 11.0

 11.1

 11.3

 11.2

 11.0

 11.0

 11.0

 10.7

 10.2

 10.3

 10.0

 10.0

 10.0

 10.1

 0.0

 0.0

 0.0

 0.0

 0.0

 0.0

 0.0

 0.0

 0.0

 0.0

 11.0

 11.2

 11.3

 11.2

 11.1

 11.2

 11.4

 11.3

 11.2

 11.0

 11.1

 10.9

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

RIPON ON THE STANISLAUS RIVER

 ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS WATER TEMPERATURE, DEG DISSOLVED OXYZEN, PPM
<PAGE>   1
                                                                  Exhibit 11 


                              THE PIONEER GROUP
                                      
                COMPUTATION OF EARNINGS PER SHARE (UNAUDITED)
                                      
                (DOLLARS IN THOUSANDS EXCEPT PER SHARE AMOUNTS)


<TABLE>

COMPUTATION FOR CONSOLIDATED
STATEMENT OF INCOME                                            THREE MONTHS ENDED MARCH 31,
-------------------                                            ----------------------------

<CAPTION>
                                                                   1997            1996
                                                                   ----            ----

<S>                                                            <C>             <C>
NET INCOME(1)                                                  $      7,309    $     5,114
                                                                ===========    ===========

SHARES

        Weighted average number of
        common shares outstanding                                25,129,000     24,924,000

        Dilutive effect of stock options and restricted
        stock proceeds as common stock
        equivalents computed under the treasury
        stock method using the average price
        during the period                                           374,000        515,000

WEIGHTED AVERAGE NUMBER OF SHARES
        outstanding as adjusted (1)                              25,503,000     25,439,000
                                                                ===========    ===========

EARNINGS PER SHARE (1)                                          $      0.29    $      0.20
                                                                ===========    ===========
</TABLE>


(1) These amounts agree with the related amounts in the Consolidated Statement
of Income.
#### § 234.51 Persons to whom a lump-sum refund payment is payable.

Employees receive their lump-sum refund payment from the Board, without applying for it, at the time their regular annuity is awarded. If an employee dies without receiving payment of a regular annuity, the lump-sum refund payment is payable to the employee's survivors in the same order of priority as shown for the RLS in § 234.44.
NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE REHEARING MOTION AND, IF FILED, DETERMINED

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF FLORIDA SECOND DISTRICT

PAUL ANTHONY NEWMAN, ) ) Appellant, ) ) v. ) Case No. 2D18-1739 ) STATE OF FLORIDA, ) ) Appellee. ) ) Opinion filed September 16, 2020. Appeal from the Circuit Court for Charlotte County; George C. Richards, Judge. Paul Newman, pro se. Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Jonathan P. Hurley, Assistant Attorney General, Tampa, for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.
KHOUZAM, C.J., and BLACK, JJ., and CASE, JAMES, R., ASSOCIATE SENIOR JUDGE, Concur.
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff — Appellee, v. Erik SALAZAR-SALAZAR, a/k/a Jaime Montepeque; Moisés Salazar-Canastu; Moises Muy Canastu; Erik Salazar; Moises Canastu; and Erik Salazar-Salas, Defendant — Appellant.

Nos. 05-50313, 05-50315.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted Feb. 9, 2006.*

Filed Feb. 17, 2006.

Ellyn M. Lindsay, Esq., USLA — Office of the U.S. Attorney Criminal Division, Los Angeles, CA, for Plaintiff-Appellee.

Kathryn A. Young, Esq., FPDCA — Federal Public Defender’s Office, Los Angeles, CA, for Defendant-Appellant.

*754Before: PREGERSON, W. FLETCHER, and BYBEE, Circuit Judges.

*

This panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. *See*Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

MEMORANDUM **

The written resentencing order must be corrected to conform to the district court’s oral pronouncement of sentence. *See, e.g., United States v. Hicks,*997 F.2d 594, 597 (9th Cir.1993). As the government concedes, the oral pronouncement of sentence did not include any period of supervised release. Thus, the period of supervised release in the written order must be stricken.

In addition, the findings in the written order should be corrected to conform to the record. The new resentencing order should specify that defendant had only one prior drug offense. Further, it should eliminate the implication that defendant’s prior conviction for domestic violence was exceptionally violent by omitting the word “violent” from the phrase “violent domestic violence.”

VACATED and REMANDED.

**

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
§ 30.716 What will cause OWCP to automatically exclude a physician or other provider of medical services and supplies? ( a ) OWCP shall automatically exclude a physician, hospital, or provider of medical services or supplies who: ( 1 ) Has been convicted of a crime described in § 30.715(a); or
( 2 ) Has been excluded or suspended, or has resigned in lieu of exclusion or suspension, from participation in any federal or state program for which payments are made to providers for similar medical, surgical or hospital services, appliances or supplies.
( b ) The exclusion applies to participating in the program and to seeking payment under this part for services performed after the date of the entry of the judgment of conviction or order of exclusion, suspension or resignation, as the case may be, by the court or agency concerned. Proof of the conviction, exclusion, suspension or resignation may consist of a copy thereof authenticated by the seal of the court or agency concerned.
( c ) A provider may be excluded on a voluntary basis at any time.
[71 FR 78534, Dec. 29, 2006, as amended at 84 FR 3057, Feb. 8, 2019]
Management Themes Applied to Idaho Roadless Areas

Wild Land Recreation

Primitive

Backcountry/Restoration

General Forest , Rangeland and Grassland

Special Areas of Historic or Tribal Significance

Forest Plan Special Areas

Wilderness

National Forest System Lands

(Other ownership is not displayed)

Sawtooth Wilderness

Frank Church-River of No Return Wilderness

Lime Creek

Smoky Mountains

Black Pine

Loon Creek

Pioneer Mountains

Buttercup Mountain

Boulder - White Clouds

Mount Harrison

Mahogany Butte

Hanson Lakes

Sublett

Elk Ridge

Cache Peak

Railroad Ridge

Lone Cedar

Thorobred

Liberal Mountain

Cottonwood

Blackhorse Creek

Fifth Fork Rock Creek

Third Fork Rock Creek

Huckleberry

Pettit

§ ̈¦84

§ ̈¦86

§ ̈¦15

£¤93

£¤20

£¤26

£¤30

£¤93

£¤20

£¤93

£¤20

¬«28

¬«75

¬«46

¬«21

¬«37

¬«22

¬«24

¬«33

¬«81

¬«77

¬«39

¬«27

¬«25

¬«23

¬«79

¬«74

¬«50

¬«78

¬«25

¬«46

¬«25

Roy

Almo

Elba

Paul

Arco

Eden Buhl

Pine

Basin

Malta

Declo

Moore

Filer

Carey

Bridge

Oakley

Marion

Albion

Heglar

Burley

Rupert

Grouse

Leslie

Mackay

Chilly

Hansen

Jerome

Picabo

Hailey

Corral

Clover

Tuttle

Idavada

Sublett

Acequia

Gilmore

Ketchum

Atlanta

Clayton

Stanley

Sunbeam

Challis

Gannett

Gooding

Strevell

Rockland

Aberdeen

Sterling

Berenice

Rogerson

Kimberly Murtaugh

Hazelton

Dietrich

Shoshone

Bellevue

Hagerman

Patterson

Hollister

Richfield

King Hill

Hill City

Fairfield

Roseworth

Springdale

Butte City

Lost River

Darlington

Sun Valley

Castleford

Three Creek

Atomic City

Featherville

Glenns Ferry

American Falls

Sawtooth Idaho Roadless Rule Management Themes

10 5 0 10 I Miles

The USDA Forest Service uses the most current and complete

data available. GIS Data and product accuracy may vary.

Using GIS products for puposes other than those for which they

were intended may yield inaccurate or misleading results.

The USDA Forest Service reserves the right to correct, update,

modify, or replace GIS products without notification.
# C o urt o f A ppe a ls
o f th e S ta te o f G e o rg ia

ATLANTA,_

_ _ __ _ _ __ _ __ _ _ _ _ _ __ _ Th e Co u rt

o f Ap p ea l s h er eb y p a s s es t h e f

o ll owi n g o r der :
A2 3 A1 74 6 . I N THE I N TEREST OF N. O., et a l., CHI LDREN (MOTHER). A2 3 A1 74 7 . I N THE I N TEREST OF A. S. et a l ., CHI LDREN (FATHER).

I n this d ep end enc y ac t io n, the mo ther and f athe r f i l e d s ep arate mo tio ns f

o r

v isitatio n. Fo llo w ing a hearing, the tr i a l c o u r t e ntered an o r d e r o n M ay 1 7 , 2023,

c o ntinu ing the matter u ntil the trial o n the t e rminatio n o f p arental rights set f o r J u ne 2023. T he p arents filed these d irec t a p p eals f ro m the M ay 17 , 2023 o rd er. W e lac k j u risd ic tio n.

“ G enerally, a n o rd er is f

inal and ap pealable w hen it leav es no issu es r emaining
to be reso lv ed , co nstitu tes the c o u rt’ s final ru ling on the m erits o f t he a c tio n, and leav e s the p arties w ith no f u rther rec o urse in the trial c o u rt. ” T ho ma s v
. D o u

gla s C o u n ty , 21 7 Ga. A p p
. 520, 522 ( 1 ) (457 SE2d 835) (1 9 9 5); see OCGA §§ 5- 6

- 34 (a) (1 ) (p ro v id ing f

o r d irec t ap p e als f

r o m f inal ju d gments); 1 5

- 1 1

- 35 (p ro v id ing f o r d irec t ap p eals f ro m f inal j u venile c o u rt o rd ers). A n o rd er w ithin a d ep end enc y p r oc eed ing d ec id ing temp orary cu sto d y o f the c hild is a “ f inal o rd er,” w ithin the meaning o f OCGA § 5- 6

- 34 (a) (1 ), f

ro m whic h a d irec t ap p eal lies. In the In t eres t o f S

. J. , 27 0 Ga. A p p
. 5 98, 6 08 (1 ) ( a) (6 0 7 SE2d 225) (2004). H ere, ho w ev er, the o rd er c o ntinu ing the

c ase did no t d ec id e temp orary c u sto d y no r o therw ise reso lv e all issu es in t h is c ase,

w hic h remained p end ing bef ore the j u v e nile c o u rt. 1 See C i ti Fi n a nci a l Sv cs
. , I n c. v
. Ho lla n d , 31 0 Ga. A p p
. 480, 481 (7 13 SE2d 67 8) ( 201 1 ). Ac c o rd ingly, the p arents w ere requ ired to u se the interlo c u to ry ap p eal p ro c ed ures – inc lu d ing o b taining a c ertif ic a t e

1 I nd eed , the f

ather has s inc e f

i l e d a n o t h e r d irec t ap peal f ro m an o rd er o f the j u v enile c o u rt entered o n Oc t o ber 1 2, 2023. See Case N o
. A 24A 09 01

. January 29, 2024o f immed iate rev iew f ro m the j u v enile c o u rt

– to ap p eal the j u v enile c o u rt’ s M ay 1 7 , 2023 o rd e r. See OCGA § 5- 6

- 34 (b); C i ti Fi na n ci a l , 31 0 Ga. A p p
. at 481

. Their f ailu re t o d o so d ep riv es u s of j u risd ic tio n o v er these d irec t ap p eals, w hic h are here b y D I SM I SSED

.

C o u r t o f A p p e a l s o f t h e S t a t e o

f G e o r g ia C le r k ’ s O f f i c e , A t la n t a ,

_

_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ I c e r ti fy t h a t t h e a b o v e i s a t r u e e x t r a c t f r o m t h e m i n u t e s o

f t h e C o u r t o

f A p p e a l s o f G e o r g i a

. W i tn e s s m y s i g n a t u r e a n d th e s e a l o

f s a i d c o u r t h e r e t o a f f i x e d t h e d a y a n d y e a r l a s t a b o v e w r i t t e n

.

, C l e r k

. 01/29/2024
```

[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 170 (Friday, August 31, 2012)]
[Notices]
[Page 53249]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2012-21573]

[[Page 53249]]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF STATE

[Public Notice 8006]

Meeting of the International Telecommunication Advisory Committee 
(ITAC)

SUMMARY: This notice announces a meeting of the International 
Telecommunication Advisory Committees (ITAC) to review status of 
preparations for the World Conference on International 
Telecommunication and the World Telecommunication Standardization 
Assembly.
    The ITAC will meet on September 19, 2012 from 10AM to noon EDT at 
1120 20th Street, 10th floor, Washington, DC to review the status of 
preparations for the World Conference on International 
Telecommunication and the World Telecommunication Standardization 
Assembly. Attendance at this meeting is open to the public as seating 
capacity allows. The public will have an opportunity to provide 
comments at these meetings. People desiring further information on this 
meeting, including those wishing to request reasonable accommodation to 
attend the meeting, should contact the Secretariat at 
minardje@state.gov, by September 10, 2012.

    Dated: August 24, 2012.
Marian R. Gordon,
International Communications & Information Policy, U.S. Department of 
State.
[FR Doc. 2012-21573 Filed 8-30-12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4710-07-P
```
**EXHIBIT 32.1**

 

CERTIFICATIONPURSUANT TO RULE 13a-14(b) OF THE EXCHANGE ACT AND 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ENACTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

 

In connection withthe Quarterly Report of Intrusion Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q (the“Report”), for the quarter ended September 30, 2009 as filed with theSecurities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, each of the undersignedOfficers of the Company does hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,as enacted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,that:

 
| (1)    | The Report fully  complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the  Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and |
|--------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   |                                                                                                                                                        |
| (2)    | The information  contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the  financial condition and results of operations of the Company.      |

 

 
| November 12,  2009 | /s/ G. Ward  Paxton      |
|-------------------------|--------------------------|
|                    | G. Ward Paxton           |
|                    | Chief Executive  Officer |

 

 
| November 12, 2009 | /s/ Michael L. Paxton   |
|------------------------|-------------------------|
|                   | Michael L. Paxton       |
|                   | Chief Financial Officer |

 

**The foregoing certification isbeing furnished solely pursuant to Section 906 of the act and is not beingfiled as part of the report or as a separate disclosure document.**

 

----
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY HIGH

 31,406

 29,637

 29,687

 29,228

 29,768

 29,377

 29,481

 30,175

 30,661

 30,375

 30,837

 31,192

 31,572

 32,337

 30,877

 29,637

 29,412

 29,103

 28,848

 29,487

 28,670

 28,652

 29,110

 29,549

 31,510

 29,693

 29,347

 28,989

 29,523

 29,184

 28,124

 18,568

 18,465

 18,066

 18,885

 19,790

 20,419

 21,166

 21,237

 21,056

 20,231

 19,451

 19,713

 19,141

 21,085

 20,944

 19,802

 19,887

 19,864

 20,624

 21,127

 20,705

 19,808

 19,629

 18,981

 20,621

 19,896

 18,890

 17,993

 17,705

 17,771

 18,975

 24,910

 24,226

 23,817

 24,498

 24,818

 25,084

 25,500

 25,593

 25,610

 25,194

 25,198

 25,415

 25,990

 26,694

 26,571

 25,651

 25,437

 25,335

 25,373

 25,416

 24,352

 24,150

 24,210

 24,810

 26,187

 24,604

 24,120

 23,791

 23,652

 23,808

 24,265

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

OCTOBER 2014 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: November 3, 2014

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

PORT CHICAGO BOTTOM IN SUISUN BAY