alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>   1
                                                                    EXHIBIT 21.1

              SUBSIDIARIES OF THE REGISTRANT, MEGO FINANCIAL CORP.

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                           JURISDICTION OF  PERCENT
NAME OF SUBSIDIARY                          INCORPORATION    OWNED    PARENT
------------------                         ---------------   -----    ------
<S>                                        <C>               <C>      <C>
Preferred Equities Corporation                 Nevada         100%     Mego
Brigantine Preferred Properties, Inc.          Nevada         100%     PEC
The Brig, Inc.                               New Jersey        99%     BPP
Brigantine Inn Marketing, Inc.               New Jersey       100%     BPP
Brigantine Inn Management, Inc.              New Jersey       100%     BPP
Central Nevada Utilities Company               Nevada         100%     PEC
Central Nevada Realty Company                  Nevada         100%     PEC
Southern Colorado Properties, Inc.            Colorado        100%     PEC
Colorado Land and Grazing Corp.               Colorado        100%     PEC
Calvada Springs Corporation                    Nevada         100%     PEC
Preferred Vacation Resorts, Inc.               Nevada         100%     PEC
First National Equity Corp.                    Nevada         100%     PEC
Calvada Homes, Inc.                            Nevada         100%     PEC
Preferred Equities Insurance Agency, Inc.      Nevada         100%     PEC
Preferred Colorado Land Co.                   Colorado         80%     PEC
Steamboat Suites, Inc.                        Colorado        100%     PEC
RVS Marketing, Inc.                            Texas          100%     PEC
Overlook Food and Beverage Company            Colorado        100%     PEC
Calvada Properties Corporation                 Nevada         100%     PEC
First Corporation of Nevada                    Nevada         100%     PEC
Preferred Management Corp.                     Nevada         100%     PEC
Resort Properties Advertising, Inc.            Nevada         100%     PEC
Sunburst Development, Inc.                     Nevada         100%     PEC
</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET AS OF SEPTEMBER 30, 1998 AND THE CONDENSED
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS FOR THE NINE MONTHS ENDED SEPTEMBER 30,
1998 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1998
<CASH>                                           4,453
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  250,344
<ALLOWANCES>                                     3,888
<INVENTORY>                                    144,821
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               399,511
<PP&E>                                         104,692
<DEPRECIATION>                                  31,707
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 542,815
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          205,522
<BONDS>                                        110,791
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                     15,000
<COMMON>                                           463
<OTHER-SE>                                     203,829
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   542,815
<SALES>                                      1,438,913
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             1,638,639
<CGS>                                        1,294,919
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                1,428,836
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               181,147
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              13,337
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 15,319
<INCOME-TAX>                                     6,128
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     9,191
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.18
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.18
        

</TABLE>
#### Charles Roger JORSS, Plaintiff — Appellant, v. Arnold SCHWARZENEGGER; * et al., Defendants — Appellees.

No. 03-15217.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted Feb. 13, 2006.**

Decided Feb. 22, 2006.

Charles Roger Jorss, lone, CA, pro se.

Constance L. Picciano, Esq., AGCA-Office of the California Attorney General *826(SAC) Department of Justice, Sacramento, CA, for Defendants-Appellees.

Before: FERNANDEZ, RYMER, and BYBEE, Circuit Judges.

*

 Arnold Schwarzenegger is substituted for his predecessor, Gray Davis, as Governor for the State of California. *See*Fed. R.App. P. 43(c)(2).

**

 The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. *See*Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

MEMORANDUM ***

California state prisoner Charles Roger Jorss appeals pro se from the district court’s judgment dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action under the screening provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 1915A. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. After de novo review, *Resnick v. Hayes,*213 F.3d 443, 447 (9th Cir.2000), we affirm.

Jorss filed an amended complaint on behalf of other prisoners, identifying himself in the caption as “assisting the plaintiff[s].” The district court properly dismissed the complaint because a plaintiff acting pro se cannot represent others. *See Johns v. County of San Diego,*114 F.3d 874, 876 (9th Cir.1997) (‘While a non-attorney may appear pro se on his own behalf, he has no authority to appear as an attorney for others than himself.”) (internal quotations and citation omitted).

Jorss’s contention that he stated a claim under the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act (“RICO”) is without merit. Even were Jorss permitted to proceed pro se as the sole plaintiff, his RICO claim would fail because he did not allege injury to his business or property. *See Oscar v. Univ. Students Co-op. Ass’n,*965 F.2d 783, 785 (9th Cir.1992) (en banc) (“injuries to property are not actionable under RICO unless they result in tangible financial loss to the plaintiff’ and “personal injuries are not compensable under RICO”).

AFFIRMED

***

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
<PAGE>
                                                                      EXHIBIT 12


                             BELLSOUTH CORPORATION
                    COMPUTATION OF EARNINGS TO FIXED CHARGES
                             (DOLLARS IN MILLIONS)


<TABLE>
<S>      <C>                                                                            <C>
                                                                                          For the Six
                                                                                         Months Ended
                                                                                         June 30, 2002
                                                                                         -------------
1.       Earnings

         (a) Income from continuing operations before deductions for taxes and interest  $       3,232

         (b) Portion of rental expense representative of interest factor                            43

         (c) Equity in losses from less-than-50% owned investments (accounted for under
             the equity method of accounting)                                                        8

         (d) Excess of earnings over distributions of less-than-50% owned investments
            (accounted for under the equity method of accounting)                                 (229)

             TOTAL                                                                       $       3,054
                                                                                         =============


2.       Fixed Charges

         (a) Interest                                                                   $          616

         (b) Portion of rental expense representative of interest factor                            43
                                                                                        --------------

             TOTAL                                                                      $          659
                                                                                        ==============

         Ratio (1 divided by 2)                                                                   4.63
                                                                                        ==============
</TABLE>
EXHIBIT 12
                     AMERITECH CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
                COMPUTATION OF RATIO OF EARNINGS TO FIXED CHARGES
                                   (Unaudited)
                                        
                              (Dollars in Millions)
                                        
                                                Three Months Ended
                                                       March 31
                                                  --------------
                                                 1999         1998
                                                 ----         ----
EARNINGS
--------
Income before interest, income taxes
 and undistributed equity earnings..........   $1,188        $  884
Portion of rent expense
 representing interest......................       19            18
Michigan Single Business tax................        9             7
Preferred dividends of subsidiaries (2).....       15            10
                                               ------        ------
Total earnings (2).........................    $1,231        $  919
                                               ------        ------
FIXED CHARGES
-------------
Interest expense............................   $  134        $  175
Capitalized interest........................        6             5
Portion of rent expense
 representing interest......................       19            18
Preferred dividends of subsidiaries (2).....       15            10
                                               ------        ------
Total fixed charges.........................   $  174        $  208
                                               ------        ------
Ratio of earnings to fixed charges..........     7.07          4.42
                                               ======        ======


(1)  Earnings represent income before income taxes and fixed charges.
     Since we have already deducted the Michigan Single Business Tax
     (the Tax) and rental expense to arrive at income before interest
     and income taxes, the Tax and the one-third portion of rental
     expense considered to be fixed charges are added back to arrive at
     total earnings.
     
(2)  As required by SEC rules, we have grossed up the preferred stock
     dividends to an amount representing the pretax earnings needed to
     cover the dividend requirements.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY HIGH

 120

 116

 127

 120

 127

 120

 125

 115

 124

 119

 120

 117

 118

 123

 119

 125

 120

 121

 121

 125

 124

 121

 115

 125

 131

 122

 119

 124

 126

 130

 127

 112

 111

 112

 115

 115

 113

 113

 112

 111

 113

 112

 112

 114

 113

 114

 113

 114

 114

 111

 111

 112

 111

 111

 116

 117

 117

 116

 116

 117

 121

 122

 116

 114

 115

 117

 117

 116

 115

 114

 114

 115

 115

 113

 116

 116

 116

 114

 117

 117

 115

 113

 115

 113

 113

 120

 119

 118

 117

 118

 120

 126

 124

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

DECEMBER 2000 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: January 16, 2001

HIGH LOW MEAN

 52.5

 51.9

 51.6

 51.9

 51.8

 51.7

 52.7

 53.8

 53.9

 54.8

 55.0

 54.4

 53.3

 53.9

 55.5

 54.5

 53.5

 52.2

 51.6

 51.4

 51.8

 51.8

 51.7

 52.2

 51.1

 50.4

 49.9

 49.4

 49.4

 49.7

 49.9

 51.3

 50.5

 51.1

 51.4

 51.4

 51.1

 51.4

 52.0

 52.2

 53.9

 54.0

 52.9

 52.0

 52.9

 53.8

 53.1

 52.2

 50.3

 50.2

 49.7

 49.8

 50.1

 50.2

 50.7

 49.1

 48.4

 48.2

 47.9

 47.7

 47.5

 47.7

 52.0

 51.2

 51.4

 51.7

 51.6

 51.5

 52.0

 52.8

 53.2

 54.4

 54.4

 53.7

 52.8

 53.4

 54.6

 53.9

 52.8

 51.3

 50.9

 50.6

 50.8

 51.0

 51.0

 51.4

 50.1

 49.4

 49.1

 48.7

 48.6

 48.7

 48.9

HIGH LOW MEAN

 10.2

 10.3

 10.0

 9.8

 9.8

 9.9

 9.9

 9.8

 9.8

 9.4

 9.3

 9.3

 9.4

 9.2

 9.2

 9.3

 9.3

 9.6

 11.0

 11.1

 11.0

 11.0

 10.9

 10.8

 11.0

 11.1

 11.1

 11.2

 11.2

 11.0

 11.0

 9.8

 9.9

 9.7

 9.6

 9.5

 9.5

 9.6

 9.4

 9.3

 9.1

 8.9

 8.9

 8.9

 8.8

 8.7

 8.8

 8.9

 9.0

 9.2

 10.5

 10.5

 10.5

 10.4

 10.3

 10.3

 10.6

 10.6

 10.6

 10.6

 10.4

 10.4

 10.0

 10.1

 9.9

 9.7

 9.7

 9.7

 9.7

 9.6

 9.5

 9.3

 9.1

 9.0

 9.1

 9.0

 8.9

 9.0

 9.1

 9.3

 9.9

 10.7

 10.7

 10.7

 10.6

 10.5

 10.6

 10.8

 10.8

 10.8

 10.8

 10.7

 10.6

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

RIPON ON THE STANISLAUS RIVER

 ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS WATER TEMPERATURE, DEG DISSOLVED OXYZEN, PPM
CENTRAL VALLEY OPERATIONS OFFICE

CHINOOK SALMON REPORT

February 2012

Note: Shaded area not verified with DFG data Preliminary Data - Subject to Change

Winter Run Chinook Salmon Estimated Loss (Incidental Take) Spring Run Chinook Salmon Estimated Loss (Incidental Take) 

Daily SWP Daily CVP Daily Combined Season Combined Daily SWP Daily CVP Daily Combined Season Combined Dail

Tagged* No Tag Tagged* No Tag Tagged* No Tag Tagged* No Tag Tagged No Tag Tagged No Tag Tagged No Tag Tagged No Tag In 

DATE Estimated Estimated Estimated Estimated Estimated Estimated Estimated Estimated Estimated Estimated Estimated Estimated Estimated Estimated Estimated Estimated

Loss Loss Loss Loss Loss Loss Loss Loss Loss Loss Loss Loss Loss Loss Loss Loss

1-Feb-12 0006 0 6 306 18 0000 0000 2,605 

2-Feb-12 105 0 0 0 105 0 411 18 0000 0000 2,572 

3-Feb-12 73 0 3 1 76 1 487 19 0000 0000 3,331 

4-Feb-12 36 0 0 0 36 0 523 19 0000 0000 3,331 

5-Feb-12 36 0 0 0 36 0 559 19 0000 0000 3,331 

6-Feb-12 18 18 0 0 18 18 577 37 0000 0000 2,202 

7-Feb-12 0006 0 6 577 43 0000 0000 2,202 

8-Feb-12 0000 0 0 577 43 0000 0000 1,101 

9-Feb-12 36 0 1 0 37 0 614 43 0000 0000 1,101 

10-Feb-12 0000 0 0 614 43 0000 0000 1,101 

11-Feb-12 0 0 12 0 12 0 626 43 0000 0000 1,101 

12-Feb-12 0000 0 0 626 43 0000 0000 1,476 

13-Feb-12 0000 0 0 626 43 0000 0000 1,706 

14-Feb-12 4900 4 9 630 52 0000 0000 2,202 

15-Feb-12 0000 0 0 630 52 0000 0000 2,669 

16-Feb-12 18 0 2 9 20 9 650 61 0000 0000 2,340 

17-Feb-12 53 0 7 0 60 0 710 61 0000 0000 1,658 

18-Feb-12 34 17 3 3 37 20 747 81 0000 0000 1,476 

19-Feb-12 0000 0 0 747 81 0000 0000 1,476 

20-Feb-12 0000 0 0 747 81 0000 0000 1,101 

21-Feb-12 13 0 0 0 13 0 760 81 0000 0000 1,101 

22-Feb-12 0000 0 0 760 81 0000 0000 1,101 

23-Feb-12 0 36 0 0 0 36 760 117 0000 0000 1,101 

Banks T

24-Feb-12 36 72 0 0 36 72 796 189 0000 0 0 0 0 1,101 

25-Feb-12 0000 0 0 796 189 0000 0 0 0 0 1,101 26-Feb-12 18 0 0 0 18 0 814 189 0000 0 0 0 0 1,101 27-Feb-12 0 17 0 0 0 17 814 206 0000 0 0 0 0 1,882 28-Feb-12 17 38 0 0 17 38 831 244 0000 0 0 0 0 1,476 29-Feb-12 55 55 0 0 55 55 886 299 0000 0 0 0 0 2,294 

Total 552 262 28 25 580 287 831 299 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 52,343 

Winter Run Incidental Take Levels (Oct 1 thru May 31) Spring Run Incidental Take Levels for Season Combined Total (Oct 1 thru Jun 30)
#### § 404.1519f Type of purchased examinations.

We will purchase only the specific examinations and tests we need to make a determination in your claim. For example, we will not authorize a comprehensive medical examination when the only evidence we need is a special test, such as an X-ray, blood studies, or an electrocardiogram.

[56 FR 36956, Aug. 1, 1991]
EXHIBIT 12.1

Certification by the Chief Executive Officer

Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002

I, Xiaodong Wu, Chief Executive Officer of China Medical Technologies Inc. (the Company), certify that:

1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 20-F of the Company;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the
statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the
Company as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. The Companys other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the Company and we have:

(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the Company, including its
consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

(b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the Companys disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the controls and procedures, as of the end of the period
covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

(c) Disclosed in this report any change in the Companys internal
control over financial reporting that occurred during the Companys most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the Companys internal control over financial reporting; and

5. The Companys other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over
financial reporting, to the Companys auditors and the audit committee of Companys board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):

(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are
reasonably likely to adversely affect the Companys ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the Companys internal control over financial reporting.

Date: September 29, 2006



|       |  |                        
|------ |  | -----------------------
|By:    |  | /S/    XIAODONG
WU     
|Name:  |  | Xiaodong Wu            
|Title: |  | Chief Executive Officer
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY HIGH

 268

 258

 220

 211

 209

 203

 194

 184

 178

 190

 190

 189

 183

 190

 186

 190

 189

 189

 192

 194

 203

 205

 206

 217

 224

 232

 233

 241

 234

 233

 235

 197

 177

 158

 146

 145

 139

 125

 128

 140

 137

 145

 152

 151

 147

 155

 167

 174

 175

 174

 183

 193

 190

 191

 203

 208

 207

 207

 212

 204

 208

 201

 229

 217

 191

 180

 176

 163

 151

 153

 161

 168

 172

 174

 172

 172

 175

 179

 182

 185

 188

 191

 197

 199

 203

 207

 213

 219

 222

 225

 222

 221

 220

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

JANUARY 2002 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: February 12, 2002

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

SAN ANDREAS ON THE SAN JOAQUIN RIVER
### SUBCHAPTER II—DIVESTMENT FROM CERTAIN COMPANIES THAT INVEST IN IRAN