alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY HIGH

 681

 696

 695

 749

 709

 730

 687

 695

 710

 705

 733

 732

 721

 664

 673

 674

 707

 609

 756

 802

 806

 747

 751

 707

 697

 764

 709

 676

 595

 548

 468

 437

 447

 445

 454

 462

 462

 457

 452

 456

 451

 473

 494

 515

 515

 504

 511

 507

 546

 496

 476

 465

 438

 447

 452

 447

 507

 452

 421

 369

 310

 280

 541

 564

 568

 592

 567

 548

 536

 551

 556

 564

 563

 572

 574

 572

 568

 597

 584

 588

 581

 597

 625

 590

 591

 534

 554

 634

 549

 517

 455

 382

 367

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

MARCH 2005 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: April 26, 2005

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

DELTA MENDOTA CANAL AT CHECK 13 (O'NEILL)
##### 



Exhibit 99.3
 Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm on Compliance
 
 Report of
Management on Compliance Report of Management on Compliance
   /s/ Ernst & Young LLP Des Moines,
IowaMarch 13, 2006




---



##### 



Report of Management on Compliance
  /s/ Ellen Z. Lamale




---



##### 



Exhibit A
Specified Standards
 I. Funding Agreement Payments
  1.
    
    calculated according to the terms of the Funding Agreement; and2.
    
    promptly paid, within two business days of the due date, to the Indenture
Trustee at the direction of the appropriate Principal Life Income Fundings Trust.
 II. Guarantee Payments in Support of the Payment of Amounts Due on the Funding Agreement
  1.
    
    calculated according to the terms of the Funding Agreement; and2.
    
    promptly paid, within two business days of the due date, to the Indenture
Trustee at the direction of the appropriate Principal Life Income Fundings Trust.
 III. Payments Under Indenture
### §9519. Biennial report

The Director shall, on a biennial basis, transmit to the President, the Board, and the appropriate congressional committees, and make widely available to the public (including by means of the Internet), a report containing the following:

(1) A description of the activities carried out by and through the National Education Centers during the prior fiscal years.

(2) A summary of each grant, contract, and cooperative agreement in excess of $100,000 funded through the National Education Centers during the prior fiscal years, including, at a minimum, the amount, duration, recipient, purpose of the award, and the relationship, if any, to the priorities and mission of the Institute, which shall be available in a user-friendly electronic database.

(3) A description of how the activities of the National Education Centers are consistent with the principles of scientifically valid research and the priorities and mission of the Institute.

(4) Such additional comments, recommendations, and materials as the Director considers appropriate.

(Pub. L. 107–279, title I, §119, Nov. 5, 2002, 116 Stat. 1953.)
#### § 404.959 Effect of dismissal of a request for a hearing before an administrative law judge.

The dismissal of a request for a hearing is binding, unless it is vacated by an administrative law judge or the Appeals Council.

[45 FR 52081, Aug. 5, 1980, as amended at 51 FR 303, Jan. 3, 1986]
§ 404.421 How are deductions made when a beneficiary fails to have a child in his or her care? Deductions for failure to have a child in care (as defined in subpart D of this part) are made as follows: ( a ) *Wife's or husband's benefit.* A deduction is made from the wife's or husband's benefits to which he or she is entitled for any month if he or she is under full retirement age and does not have in his or her care a child of the insured entitled to child's benefits. However, a deduction is not made for any month in which he or she is age 62 or over, but under full retirement age, and there is in effect a certificate of election for him or her to receive actuarially reduced wife's or husband's benefits for such month (see subpart D of this part).
( b ) *Mother's or father's benefits* — ( 1 ) *Widow or widower.* A deduction is made from the mother's or father's benefits to which he or she is entitled as the widow or widower (see subpart D of this part) of the deceased individual upon whose earnings such benefit is based, for any month in which he or she does not have in his or her care a child who is entitled to child's benefits based on the earnings of the deceased insured individual.
( 2 ) *Surviving divorced mother or father.* A deduction is made from the mother's or father's benefits to which he or she is entitled as the surviving divorced mother or father (see subpart D of this part) of the deceased individual upon whose earnings record such benefit is based, for any month in which she or he does not have in care a child of the deceased individual who is her or his son, daughter, or legally adopted child and who is entitled to child's benefits based on the earnings of the deceased insured individual.
( c ) *Amount to be deducted.* The amount deducted from the benefits, as described in paragraphs (a) and (b) of this section, is equal to the amount of the benefits which is otherwise payable for the month in which she or he does not have a child in his or her care.
( d ) *When a child is considered not entitled to benefits.* For purposes of paragraphs (a) and (b) of this section, a person is considered not entitled to child's benefits for any month in which she or he is age 18 or over and is entitled to child's benefits because she or he is a full-time student at an educational institution. This paragraph applies to benefits for months after December 1964.
[68 FR 4710, Jan. 30, 2003, as amended at 68 FR 40122, July 7, 2003]
#### Max Aronson et al., Respondents, v. Bronx County Trust Company, Individually and as Successor Trustee of 1161 Shakespeare Avenue Apartment Building [New York City], under a Mortgage Trust Made between R. G. & F. Construction Corporation and Colonial Bank, as Trustee, Appellant.

No opinion. Present — Martin, P. J., Townley, Untermyer and Dore, JJ.; Dore, J., dissents and votes to reverse and grant motion to dismiss the first cause of action.
**EXHIBIT 99.11****GMAC**RFC**2005 ANNUAL STATEMENT OF COMPLIANCE CERTIFICATE**     Pursuant to the governing documents including, but not limited to various Pooling andServicing Agreements, Indentures, Trust Agreements and Sales and Servicing Agreements (“theAgreements”), where Residential Funding Corporation (“the Company”) has been appointed MasterServicer or Servicer, and an annual statement of compliance is required to be delivered to eitherthe Trustee or the Investor. The undersigned Managing Director and Director of Residential FundingCorporation, hereby certify that: (i) a review of the activities of the Master Servicer during the proceedingcalendar year has been conducted, and the performance of the duties outlined in theagreements has been made under the undersigned officers supervision; and  (ii) To the best of the undersigned officers knowledge, based on theaforementioned review, the Master Servicer has complied with the minimum servicingstandards set forth in the USAP for Mortgage Bankers, and has fulfilled itsobligations relating to the Agreements in all material respects throughout such year;and  (iii) To the best of the undersigned officers knowledge, each Subservicer hascomplied with the minimum servicing standards set forth in the USAP for MortgageBankers, and has fulfilled its obligations relating to the Agreements in all materialrespects throughout such year; and  (iv) To the best of the undersigned officers knowledge each Subservicer hasfulfilled its obligations under the servicing agreement with respect to Section 6050H,6050J and 6050P of the Internal Revenue Code with respect to the reporting offoreclosures and abandonment of Mortgage Properties.   Dated: March 15, 2006     /s/ Barbara Wendt Barbara Wendt  Managing Director, Master Servicing     /s/ Darsi Meyer Darsi Meyer  Director, Securities Administration  GMAC-RFC****
### §§1 to 7. Repealed. Aug. 13, 1946, ch. 957, title XI, §1131(32)–(37), (49), (66), 60 Stat. 1037

Section 1, act May 24, 1924, ch. 182, §8, formerly §1, 43 Stat. 140; renumbered §8 and amended Feb. 23, 1931, ch. 276, §7, 46 Stat. 1207, related to establishment of Foreign Service.

Section 1a, act May 3, 1945, ch. 105, §1, 59 Stat. 102, related to Congressional declaration of purpose.

Section 2, act May 24, 1924, ch. 182, §9, formerly §2, 43 Stat. 140; renumbered §9 and amended Feb. 23, 1931, ch. 276, §7, 46 Stat. 1207, related to definition of a Foreign Service officer and assignment to duty generally.

Section 3, act May 24, 1924, ch. 182, §10, formerly §3, 43 Stat. 140; renumbered §10 and amended Feb. 23, 1931, ch. 276, §7, 46 Stat. 1207; Apr. 24, 1939, ch. 84, §2, 53 Stat. 583; May 3, 1945, ch. 105, §§4, 5, 59 Stat. 102, 103, related to grading, classification, and compensation of officers.

Section 3a, act May 24, 1924, ch. 182, §33, as added Feb. 23, 1931, ch. 276, §7, 46 Stat. 1215; amended Apr. 24, 1939, ch. 84, §4, 53 Stat. 588, related to salary increases.

Section 4, act May 24, 1924, ch. 182, §11, formerly §4, 43 Stat. 140; renumbered §11 and amended Feb. 23, 1931, ch. 276, §7, 46 Stat. 1215; June 29, 1935, ch. 337, 49 Stat. 436, related to appointment and commission of officers.

Section 5, act May 24, 1924, ch. 182, §12, formerly §5, 43 Stat. 141; renumbered §12 and amended Feb. 23, 1931, ch. 276, §7, 46 Stat. 1208, related to examination and appointment on probation of officers.

Section 6, act May 24, 1924, ch. 182, §12, formerly §5, 43 Stat. 141; renumbered §12 and amended Feb. 23, 1931, ch. 276, §7, 46 Stat. 1208, related to appointment to a class and not to a particular post.

Section 7, act May 24, 1924, ch. 182, §14, as added Feb. 23, 1931, ch. 276, §7, 46 Stat. 1208; amended May 3, 1945, ch. 105, §6, 59 Stat. 103, related to reports and recommendations for promotions.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date of Repeal

Repeal effective three months after Aug. 13, 1946, see act Aug. 13, 1946, ch. 957, title XI, §1141, 60 Stat. 1040.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

DAY ELEVATION

 238.08

 238.08

 238.08

 238.08

 238.08

 238.08

 238.08

 238.08

 238.08

 238.08

 238.08

 238.08

 238.17

 238.38

 238.45

 238.21

 238.16

 238.05

 238.27

 238.33

 238.13

 238.20

 238.12

 238.08

 238.08

 238.08

 238.08

 238.08

 238.08

 238.08

 256

 256

 256

 256

 256

 256

 256

 256

 256

 256

 256

 256

 265

 287

 294

 269

 264

 253

 276

 282

 261

 268

 260

 256

 256

 256

 256

 256

 256

 256

STORAGE

+0

+0

+0

+0

+0

+0

+0

+0

+0

+0

+0

+0

+9

+22

+7

-25

-5

-11

+23

+6

-21

+7

-8

-4

+0

+0

+0

+0

+0

+0

CHANGE

 136

 117

 108

 208

 204

 186

 186

 199

 204

 243

 253

 218

 59

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 153

 195

 6,060

 6,030

 6,100

 5,900

 5,810

 5,790

 6,430

 6,670

 6,780

 6,600

 6,430

 6,650

 7,190

 7,630

 7,900

 7,310

 7,210

 7,060

 8,600

 7,500

 7,010

 7,270

 7,060

 6,910

 6,820

 6,800

 6,690

 6,520

 6,560

 6,600

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

OCTOBER 2009 RED BLUFF DIVERSION RESERVOIR DAILY OPERATIONS RUN DATE: November 1, 2009

IN LAKE

CANAL

 ACRE-FEET

TOTALS +0 2,669 203,890

ACRE-FEET +0 5,294 404,416

SUMMARY

RELEASE (ACRE-FEET)

TOTAL 410,178

 256

RELEASE

RIVER

CORNING TO SACTO

CANAL

RELEASE C.F.S

TEHAMA

COLUSA

 16

 34

 30

 30

 13

 11

 18

 19

 11

 25

 15

 13

 1

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 236

 468

CORNING CANAL 468

TEHAMA-COLUSA CANAL 5,294

TO SACTO RIVER 404,416
# C_2012298EN.01000901.xml

| 4.10.2012 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 298/9 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

4.10.2012

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 298/9

---

Commission communication pursuant to Article 17(5) of Regulation (EC) No 1008/2008 of the European Parliament and of the Council on common rules for the operation of air services in the Community

Invitation to tender in respect of the operation of scheduled air services in accordance with public service obligations

2012/C 298/05

| Member State | Spain |
| --- | --- |
| Concerned routes | Menorca–Madrid |
| Period of validity of the contract | Two periods of eight months (October to May) from the start of the operation |
| Deadline for submission of tenders | Two months after the date of publication of this notice |
| Address where the text of the invitation to tender and any relevant information and/or documentation related to the public tender and the public service obligation can be obtained | Ministerio de Fomento |
| Dirección General de Aviación Civil |
| Subdirección General de Transporte Aéreo |
| Paseo de la Castellana, 67 |
| 28071 Madrid |
| ESPAÑA |
| Tel. +34 915978454 |
| Fax +34 915978643 |
| E-mail: osp.dgac@fomento.es |

Member State

Spain

Concerned routes

Menorca–Madrid

Period of validity of the contract

Two periods of eight months (October to May) from the start of the operation

Deadline for submission of tenders

Two months after the date of publication of this notice

Address where the text of the invitation to tender and any relevant information and/or documentation related to the public tender and the public service obligation can be obtained

Ministerio de Fomento

Dirección General de Aviación Civil

Subdirección General de Transporte Aéreo

Paseo de la Castellana, 67

28071 Madrid

ESPAÑA

Tel. +34 915978454

Fax +34 915978643

E-mail: osp.dgac@fomento.es

---
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY HIGH

 69

 70

 68

 64

 68

 71

 71

 67

 69

 72

 71

 67

 66

 67

 67

 67

 71

 66

 66

 65

 64

 65

 65

 65

 66

 68

 68

 67

 54

 55

 55

 66

 68

 63

 62

 64

 69

 65

 65

 66

 66

 67

 66

 65

 65

 66

 65

 64

 65

 64

 64

 63

 64

 63

 64

 64

 66

 66

 27

 53

 53

 54

 68

 69

 64

 63

 66

 70

 67

 66

 67

 69

 69

 66

 66

 66

 66

 66

 66

 65

 65

 64

 64

 64

 64

 65

 65

 67

 66

 58

 53

 54

 55

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

MAY 2020 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: June 2, 2020

HIGH LOW MEAN

 66.4

 67.7

 66.0

 63.4

 65.6

 67.7

 65.9

 65.5

 67.4

 69.8

 67.8

 63.8

 62.1

 61.7

 62.8

 62.9

 62.2

 60.5

 60.2

 60.1

 61.7

 61.7

 61.2

 61.6

 62.5

 63.1

 63.9

 67.9

 63.3

 61.9

 61.2

 61.8

 63.5

 61.0

 59.4

 60.5

 63.0

 63.3

 61.5

 63.3

 65.3

 64.0

 61.7

 59.8

 59.1

 59.3

 60.0

 60.1

 58.9

 58.0

 57.6

 58.7

 59.2

 58.7

 58.6

 59.5

 60.2

 60.8

 61.4

 60.6

 60.2

 59.2

 64.2

 65.5

 62.6

 61.4

 63.1

 65.3

 64.9

 63.8

 65.2

 67.3

 65.6

 62.7

 61.1

 60.6

 61.1

 61.6

 61.2

 59.7

 59.2

 59.0

 60.1

 60.3

 59.9

 60.1

 60.9

 61.6

 62.3

 62.7

 61.9

 61.0

 60.3

HIGH LOW MEAN

 8.8

 8.9

 9.7

 9.7

 9.2

 8.8

 9.1

 9.4

 9.0

 8.8

 9.1

 9.5

 9.8

 9.8

 9.9

 9.8

 9.8

 9.7

 9.9

 10.1

 10.1

 10.0

 10.0

 10.0

 10.0

 9.9

 9.8

 9.9

 10.1

 10.1

 10.2

 8.5

 8.5

 8.7

 9.3

 8.7

 8.4

 8.5

 8.6

 8.6

 8.4

 8.3

 9.1

 9.4

 9.6

 9.6

 9.5

 9.3

 9.5

 9.7

 9.9

 9.7

 9.7

 9.7

 9.7

 9.6

 9.5

 9.3

 8.9

 9.8

 9.9

 10.0

 8.7

 8.7

 9.4

 9.5

 9.0

 8.6

 8.9

 9.1

 8.8

 8.6

 8.9

 9.3

 9.6

 9.8

 9.7

 9.7

 9.6

 9.6

 9.8

 10.0

 9.9

 9.8

 9.9

 9.9

 9.8

 9.7

 9.5

 9.7

 9.9

 10.0

 10.1

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

RIPON ON THE STANISLAUS RIVER

 ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS WATER TEMPERATURE, DEG DISSOLVED OXYZEN, PPM
NO. 12-10-00331-CV

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS

TWELFTH COURT OF APPEALS DISTRICT

TYLER, TEXAS

' APPEAL FROM THE 321ST

IN THE MATTER OF THE MARRIAGE

OF HAROLD JOEL GARDNER AND ' JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT OF

SHIRLEY MAE GARDNER

' SMITH COUNTY, TEXAS

MEMORANDUM OPINION

PER CURIAM

This appeal is being dismissed for want of jurisdiction pursuant to Texas Rule of 

Appellate Procedure 42.3(a). The trial court’s judgment was signed on May 13, 2010. 

Under rule of appellate procedure 26.1, the notice of appeal must be filed within thirty 

days after the judgment is signed. Appellant, Harold Joel Gardner, filed a motion for new 

trial. See TEX. R. APP. P. 26.1(a) (providing that notice of appeal must be filed within 

ninety days after judgment signed if any party timely files motion for new trial). 

Therefore, his notice of appeal was due to have been filed no later than August 11, 2010. 

But Gardner did not file his notice of appeal until September 7, 2010. Because Gardner’s 

notice of appeal was not filed on or before August 11, 2010, it was untimely, and this 

court has no jurisdiction of the appeal.

On October 29, 2010, this court notified Gardner pursuant to Texas Rules of 

Appellate Procedure 37.1 and 42.3 that his notice of appeal was untimely and he had not 

filed a timely motion for extension of time to file the notice of appeal as permitted by 

Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 26.3. Gardner was further informed that the appeal 

would be dismissed unless, on or before November 8, 2010, the information in this 

appeal was amended to show the jurisdiction of this court. On November 8, 2010, 

Gardner filed a motion to extend the time for filing his notice of appeal. He explained 

that unbeknownst to him, his retained counsel did not comply with his instructions to 

initiate the appeal process in this matter. Gardner further asserts that he filed his notice 

of appeal “in the most timely manner available to him under the circumstances.” Despite 

these circumstances, however, this court is not authorized to extend the time for 
perfecting an appeal except as provided by Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure 26.1 and 

26.3. Consequently, Gardner’s motion for extension of time to file the notice of appeal is 

overruled and the appeal is dismissed for want of jurisdiction. See TEX. R. APP. P. 

42.3(a).

Opinion delivered November 10, 2010.

Panel consisted of Worthen, C.J., Griffith, J., and Hoyle, J.

(PUBLISH)
<TABLE>

                           WARRANTECH CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
                                       EXHIBIT 11
                     STATEMENT RE: COMPUTATION OF PER SHARE EARNINGS
                                      (UNAUDITED)



                                                For the Nine Months Ended               For the Three Months Ended
                                                     December 31,                                December 31,
                                          ------------------ -- --------------------    ----------------- -- ----------------
                                                 1997                   1996                   1997                1996
                                          ------------------    --------------------    ----------------     ----------------
<S>                                       <C>                   <C>                    <C>                  <C>
Earnings:
   Net income                               $  3,909,208          $ 5,266,370           $   1,012,324        $   1,832,053
                                         ==================    ====================    =================    ================

Weighted average shares outstanding:

Basic:

   Common shares                              13,228,056           13,014,242              13,284,760           13,064,092
                                         ==================    ====================    =================    ================

Fully diluted:

   Common shares                              13,228,056           13,014,242              13,284,760            13,064,092
   Assumed exercise of stock options           2,530,358            2,514,359               2,501,812             2,542,074
                                          ==================    ====================    =================    ================
                                              15,785,414           15,528,601              15,786,572            15,606,166
                                          ==================    ====================    =================    ================
Earnings Per Common Share:

Basic:
   Net income                                    $.30                   $.40                   $.08                $.14
                                          ==================    ====================    =================    ================
 
Fully diluted:
   Net income                                    $.25                   $.34                   $.06                $.12
                                          ==================    ====================    =================    ================

</TABLE>
### §§2217, 2217a. Repealed. Pub. L. 95–424, title I, §102(g)(1)(A), Oct. 6, 1978, 92 Stat. 942

Section 2217, Pub. L. 87–195, pt. I, §271, as added Pub. L. 89–583, pt. I, §106, Sept. 19, 1966, 80 Stat. 799, set forth sense of Congress that acceleration of social and economic progress would be served by an expanded effort by countries of southeast Asia and other interested countries in cooperative programs.

Section 2217a, Pub. L. 87–195, pt. I, §272, as added Pub. L. 89–583, pt. I, §106, Sept. 19, 1966, 80 Stat. 800, related to a number of criteria to be taken into account in providing assistance under the Southeast Asia Multilateral and Regional Programs.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date of Repeal

Repeal effective Oct. 1, 1978, see section 605 of Pub. L. 95–424, set out as an Effective Date of 1978 Amendment note under section 2151 of this title.