alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
 Washington, D.C. 20549
 FORM 8-K/A
 CURRENT REPORT
Pursuant to Section 13 OR 15(d) of The Securities Exchange Act of 1934
 Date of Report (Date of earliest event reported): May 5, 2011
 Carey Watermark Investors Incorporated
  Maryland

000-54263

26-2145060(State or other jurisdiction
of incorporation)

(Commission File Number)

(IRS Employer Identification No.)
 50 Rockefeller Plaza,
New York, NY

10020(Address of principal executive offices)

(Zip Code)
 (212) 492-1100
 
 (Former name or former address, if changed since last report.)
  o

Written communications pursuant to Rule 425 under the Securities Act (17 CFR 230.425)o

Soliciting material pursuant to Rule 14a-12 under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.14a-12)o

Pre-commencement communications pursuant to Rule 14d-2(b) under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.14d-2(b))o

Pre-commencement communications pursuant to Rule 13e-4(c) under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.13e-4(c))




---



##### 



Item 9.01
    
     Financial Statements and Exhibits.
       Exhibit No.
    
    Description99.1
    
    
    Consolidated financial statements of Long Beach Hotel Properties, LLC99.2
    
    
    Pro forma financial information
  - 2 -




---



##### 



SIGNATURES
  Carey Watermark Investors IncorporatedDate: July 15, 2011
    By:
    /s/ Mark J. DeCesarisMark J. DeCesarisChief Financial Officer  - 3 -
\

Frank Church-River of No Return Wilderness

Selway-Bitterroot Wilderness

Sawtooth Wilderness

Gospel-Hump Wilderness

Hells Canyon

Boise

Payette

Nez Perce

Salmon-Challis

Sawtooth

Clearwater

Targhee

Idaho Panhandle

Payette

Caribou

Targhee

Bitterroot

Sawtooth

Salmon-Challis

Caribou

Salmon-Challis

Idaho Panhandle

Boise

Salmon-Challis

Nez Perce

Caribou

Idaho Panhandle

Clearwater

Targhee

Caribou

Idaho Panhandle

Sawtooth Caribou

Caribou

§ ̈¦84

§ ̈¦15

§ ̈¦86

§ ̈¦90

§ ̈¦86

§ ̈¦90

£¤20

£¤93

£¤12

£¤95

£¤26

£¤2

1

£¤91

£¤30

£¤91

£¤89

£¤10

£¤61

£¤91

£¤91

1

£¤91

£¤30

£¤89

£¤93

£¤30

£¤26

£¤26

£¤20

£¤93

£¤91

£¤20

£¤95

£¤26 £¤20

£¤30

£¤95

£¤95

£¤95

£¤95

(!51

(!28

(!75

(!21

(!57

(!55

(!37

(!32

(!71

(!33

(!14

(!46

(!22

(!97

(!24

(!78

(!41

(!34

(!5

(!3

(!62

(!47

(!31

(!9

(!11

(!99

(!36

(!1

(!13

(!81

(!8

(!77

(!39

(!6

(!52

(!45

(!27

(!25

(!67

(!23

(!53

(!287

(!48

(!54

(!16

(!200

(!7

(!69

(!89

(!44

(!74

(!60

(!40

(!58

(!50

(!72

(!64

(!43

(!66

(!2

(!78

(!25

(!55

(!97

(!6

(!33

(!36

(!34

(!78

(!55

(!25

(!34

(!8

(!52

(!46

(!55

(!36

(!55

Avery

Driggs

Ashton

Dubois

Burley

Mackay

Emmett

Lowman

McCall

Weiser

Salmon

Kamiah

Leadore

Ketchum

Clayton

Stanley

Challis

Cascade

Council

Kooskia

Orofino

Elk City

Potlatch

Fairfield

Sandpoint

Montpelier

Malad City

Idaho City

North Fork

White Bird

Island Park

New Meadows

Grangeville

Soda Springs

Priest River

Saint Maries

Saint Anthony

Mountain Home

Bonners Ferry

Nampa

Moscow

Rexburg

Caldwell

Lewiston

Pocatello

Twin Falls

Idaho Falls

Coeur d'Alene

Boise

Legend

INTERSTATE

US HIGHWAYS

STATE ROADS

Wilderness

Roadless Recommended for Wilderness in Forest Plans

All Other Roadless Areas

National Forest

Idaho Inventoried Roadless Areas

This map is based on information from the State of Idaho contained within the

"Petition of Governor James E. Risch for Roadless Area Management in Idaho,

October 5, 2006."

IRA Data Sources:

2001 EIS: Targhee, Salmon-Challis.

Forest Plan Revision: Boise, Sawtooth, Payette, Caribou.

Revised Roadless Areas: Clearwater, Nez Perce, Idaho Panhandle, Kootenai.

¶

Map prepared by Intermountain Region 04/03/2007

0 12.5 25 50 75 100

Miles
### §263c. Anti-piracy information sharing

The Secretary is authorized to provide for the participation by the United States in the Information Sharing Centre located in Singapore, as established by the Regional Cooperation Agreement on Combating Piracy and Armed Robbery against Ships in Asia (ReCAAP).

(Pub. L. 117–81, div. E, title LI, §5107, Dec. 27, 2021, 135 Stat. 2347.)

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Definitions

Pub. L. 117–81, div. E, §5002, Dec. 27, 2021, 135 Stat. 2341, provided that: "In this division [see Tables for classification]:

"(1) Appropriate congressional committees.—The term 'appropriate congressional committees' means the Committee on Foreign Relations of the Senate and the Committee on Foreign Affairs of the House of Representatives.

"(2) Department.—If not otherwise specified, the term 'Department' means the Department of State.

"(3) Secretary.—If not otherwise specified, the term 'Secretary' means the Secretary of State."
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY HIGH

 5,311

 6,507

 7,827

 9,505

 10,256

 9,460

 10,119

 10,607

 10,083

 9,350

 7,161

 7,320

 7,354

 7,146

 8,124

 6,643

 8,088

 8,177

 7,158

 7,650

 6,919

 5,309

 4,998

 5,617

 4,723

 4,243

 3,477

 3,806

 3,872

 4,501

 4,856

 1,230

 1,212

 1,090

 1,338

 1,210

 1,094

 1,345

 1,243

 1,172

 1,440

 1,330

 1,534

 1,591

 1,820

 1,841

 1,542

 1,322

 1,313

 1,312

 1,193

 1,209

 1,068

 1,110

 1,115

 1,085

 1,022

 959

 1,044

 1,089

 925

 796

 2,678

 3,018

 3,627

 4,569

 4,670

 4,511

 4,654

 3,927

 3,710

 3,848

 3,825

 3,564

 3,679

 3,817

 3,660

 3,551

 3,521

 3,767

 3,749

 3,559

 3,301

 2,886

 2,656

 2,590

 2,561

 2,309

 2,071

 2,021

 2,093

 2,074

 2,219

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

AUGUST 2006 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: September 11, 2006

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

PITTSBURG TOP ON THE SACRAMENTO RIVER
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

DAY HIGH

 103

 106

 107

 107

 103

 104

 105

 102

 101

 104

 95

 82

 78

 77

 81

 82

 79

 85

 94

 99

 76

 71

 69

 71

 71

 73

 74

 74

 74

 73

 98

 99

 96

 100

 100

 96

 98

 96

 95

 89

 79

 74

 75

 71

 71

 78

 72

 72

 79

 76

 68

 66

 67

 67

 68

 69

 71

 70

 70

 71

 101

 102

 100

 103

 101

 100

 100

 98

 97

 97

 87

 77

 76

 74

 74

 79

 76

 77

 83

 95

 73

 69

 68

 68

 69

 71

 73

 72

 71

 72

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

APRIL 2000 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: May 2, 2000

HIGH LOW MEAN

 59.5

 60.8

 62.0

 62.1

 61.4

 61.0

 60.9

 62.6

 66.1

 68.0

 61.4

 60.2

 59.9

 59.2

 58.7

 58.1

 57.5

 57.7

 65.9

 67.2

 67.8

 67.0

 65.4

 61.2

 59.3

 64.5

 65.8

 58.7

 58.6

 59.7

 56.5

 57.0

 58.5

 59.0

 58.6

 57.8

 57.7

 58.5

 59.3

 60.4

 58.4

 58.5

 58.1

 57.2

 57.1

 57.0

 56.1

 54.9

 56.9

 59.1

 60.7

 59.7

 58.1

 55.5

 56.1

 58.5

 58.5

 56.7

 56.3

 57.1

 58.0

 59.0

 60.4

 60.5

 60.1

 59.5

 59.4

 60.5

 62.2

 63.6

 60.0

 59.5

 59.1

 58.2

 57.9

 57.5

 56.8

 56.1

 60.4

 62.9

 63.7

 63.1

 61.0

 58.0

 57.6

 60.7

 61.3

 57.7

 57.4

 58.3

HIGH LOW MEAN

 10.3

 10.2

 10.0

 9.9

 9.9

 10.1

 10.0

 9.6

 0.0

 0.0

 10.5

 10.6

 10.5

 10.4

 10.5

 10.3

 10.6

 10.8

 0.0

 0.0

 0.0

 0.0

 0.0

 10.8

 10.9

 10.2

 10.7

 11.0

 11.0

 10.9

 9.8

 9.7

 9.6

 9.5

 9.5

 9.6

 9.6

 8.9

 0.0

 0.0

 10.2

 10.3

 10.1

 10.1

 10.0

 10.0

 10.2

 10.2

 0.0

 0.0

 0.0

 0.0

 0.0

 10.6

 10.1

 8.8

 8.4

 10.7

 10.7

 10.5

 10.1

 10.0

 9.8

 9.7

 9.7

 9.9

 9.9

 9.3

 0.0

 0.0

 10.4

 10.5

 10.3

 10.3

 10.2

 10.2

 10.4

 10.6

 0.0

 0.0

 0.0

 0.0

 0.0

 10.7

 10.6

 9.6

 9.7

 10.8

 10.8

 10.7

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

RIPON ON THE STANISLAUS RIVER

 ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS WATER TEMPERATURE, DEG DISSOLVED OXYZEN, PPM
[Arthur Andersen logo]

                                        Arthur Andersen LLP

                                       33 West Monroe Street
                                       Chicago, IL 60603-5385

July 30, 1999

Ameritech Corporation
30 South Wacker Drive
Chicago, Illinois 60606



Dear Ladies and Gentlemen:

This letter is written to meet the requirements of Regulation S-K
calling for a letter from a registrant's independent accountants
whenever there has been a change in accounting principle or
practice.

We have been informed that, as of June 30, 1999, the Company
changed its accounting for directory advertising revenues from
the deferred method to the as published method. Under the as
published method, revenues and expenses are recognized at the
time directories are issued rather than over the lives of the
directories, as occurs under the deferred method.  According to
the management of the Company, this change was made to conform to
the method generally followed in the industry and by other
publishing companies.

A complete coordinated set of financial and reporting standards
for determining the preferability of accounting principles among
acceptable alternative principles has not been established by the
accounting profession. Thus, we cannot make an objective
determination of whether the change in accounting described in
the preceding paragraph is to a preferable method. However, we
have reviewed the pertinent factors, including those related to
financial reporting, in this particular case on a subjective
basis, and our opinion stated below is based on our determination
made in this manner.

We are of the opinion that the Company's change in method of
accounting is to an acceptable alternative method of accounting,
which, based upon the reasons stated for the change and our
discussions with you, is also preferable under the circumstances
in this particular case. In arriving at this opinion, we have
relied on the business judgment and business planning of your
management.

We have not audited the application of this change to the
financial statements of any period subsequent to December 31,
1998. Further, we have not examined and do not express any
opinion with respect to your financial statements for the three
and six months ended June 30, 1999.

Very truly yours,


ARTHUR ANDERSEN LLP

/s/ Arthur Andersen LLP
#### Conway & Knickerbacker v. William H. Magill, Sheriff, et al.

Filed January 3, 1898.

No. 7705.

Sheriff’s Liability for Failure to Make Levy: Action: Evidence. In order for an execution or attachment creditor to recover his debt against a sheriff, because of the latter’s failure to seize under the writ sufficient property of the debtor to satisfy the same, the burden is upon such creditor to plead and prove that, during the life of the writ, his debtor was possessed of property liable to be seized under the writ, and that the sheriff negligently failed to - seize such property.

Error from the district court of Brown county. Tried below before Bartow', J.

*Affirmed.*

*Macfarland & Altschuler*and *J. G. McNerney,*for plaintiffs in error.

*P. D. McAndreio, contra.*

Ragan, C.

G. A. Sargent & Co. was a copartnership engaged in mercantile business at Ainsworth, Nebraska, and indebted for goods purchased of Conway & Knickerbacker. On the 29th of November, 1892, before the county judge of Brown county sitting as a justice of the peace, Conway & Knickerbacker brought suit against Sargent & Co. and caused an attachment, to be issued and delivered to the sheriff of said county commanding him to seize a sufficient amount of the goods and chattels of Sargent & Co. to satisfy the claim of Conway & Knickerbacker in the sum of $180. and the probable costs of the suit, not to exceed $50. Under this order of attachment the sheriff seized the property of the attachment defendants, -which the appraisers appointed by the sheriff then and there appraised and valued at $240.79. On the 23d of December, 1892, the attached property was sold at public vendue by the sheriff to satisfy the attachment and brought *371the sum of $143. Conway & Knickerbacker then instituted this suit in the district court of Brown county against William Magill, the sheriff thereof, and the sureties on his official bond to recover the balance due them from Sargent & Co., basing their action against the sheriff upon his alleged neglect to seize sufficient property of Sargent & Co. to satisfy their, Conway & Knickerbacker’s, debt, Sargent & Co. being then and there possessed of sufficient property which could have been seized by the sheriff on the attachment writ. The trial in the district court resulted in a verdict and judgment for the sheriff and his sureties,' and Conway & Knicker-backer bring the same here for review on error.

There is not in the record one syllable of evidence which show’s or tends to show that Sargent & Co. were possessed of any property of any name or description which the sheriff could have seized on the attachment writ save and except the property he did seize., In order for an execution or attachment creditor to recover his debt against a sheriff because of the latter’s failure to seize under the writ sufficient property of the debtor to satisfy the same, the burden is upon such' creditor to plead and prove that during the life of the writ his debtor was possessed of property liable to be seized under the writ and that the sheriff negligently failed to seize such property. The judgment of the district court is

Affirmed.
(No. 73-CC-387

#### Home of the Good Shepherd of Omaha, Inc., Claimant, *vs.*State of Illinois, Department of Children and Family Services, Respondent.

*Opinion filed November 13, 1973.*

Home of the Good Shepherd of Omaha, Inc., Claimant, pro se.

William J. Scott, Attorney General; William E. Webber, Assistant Attorney General, for Respondent.

Per Curiam.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY HIGH

 117

 121

 122

 122

 144

 282

 119

 119

 120

 120

 118

 119

 129

 119

 120

 122

 121

 119

 116

 111

 112

 110

 107

 103

 107

 102

 101

 104

 100

 100

 97

 112

 117

 120

 121

 91

 103

 104

 113

 118

 108

 108

 116

 115

 115

 117

 117

 112

 107

 107

 107

 108

 104

 99

 98

 97

 98

 97

 97

 97

 95

 96

 114

 119

 121

 122

 114

 133

 114

 117

 118

 115

 116

 117

 117

 118

 118

 120

 117

 115

 113

 110

 110

 108

 104

 100

 102

 101

 98

 100

 98

 97

 96

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

MARCH 2002 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: April 10, 2002

HIGH LOW MEAN

 57.9

 55.9

 56.2

 56.6

 57.1

 58.2

 57.1

 55.3

 54.2

 55.9

 57.8

 58.6

 57.8

 57.0

 55.9

 56.2

 54.5

 54.8

 55.8

 58.0

 59.1

 58.2

 57.6

 58.0

 57.9

 59.4

 60.7

 62.0

 63.0

 63.4

 64.1

 55.1

 52.9

 52.8

 53.2

 54.1

 56.1

 54.9

 52.5

 52.0

 53.3

 54.3

 56.2

 55.2

 53.7

 53.1

 53.4

 52.8

 50.6

 52.1

 54.0

 56.0

 56.5

 55.6

 55.1

 55.1

 55.3

 56.5

 57.8

 59.0

 59.7

 60.1

 56.5

 54.6

 54.5

 55.0

 55.6

 57.0

 56.4

 54.0

 53.3

 54.5

 56.1

 57.3

 56.5

 55.4

 54.6

 54.7

 53.7

 52.8

 54.1

 56.0

 57.5

 57.4

 56.7

 56.6

 56.7

 57.4

 58.6

 60.0

 61.1

 61.7

 62.2

HIGH LOW MEAN

 9.2

 9.7

 9.7

 9.6

 9.4

 8.9

 8.7

 9.2

 9.4

 9.1

 8.9

 8.8

 8.9

 8.9

 8.9

 8.9

 8.8

 9.1

 10.4

 10.0

 9.8

 9.3

 9.3

 9.5

 9.6

 9.6

 9.4

 9.1

 9.0

 8.9

 8.7

 8.6

 9.0

 9.2

 9.1

 8.9

 8.4

 8.4

 8.6

 9.0

 8.8

 8.6

 8.4

 8.4

 8.5

 8.5

 8.5

 8.4

 8.5

 8.7

 9.4

 9.1

 8.8

 8.8

 8.8

 8.8

 8.8

 8.6

 8.3

 8.1

 7.9

 7.8

 8.9

 9.3

 9.4

 9.3

 9.1

 8.6

 8.6

 8.9

 9.2

 9.0

 8.7

 8.6

 8.6

 8.6

 8.7

 8.7

 8.6

 8.8

 9.2

 9.7

 9.4

 9.0

 9.0

 9.1

 9.2

 9.1

 8.9

 8.6

 8.4

 8.3

 8.1

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

RIPON ON THE STANISLAUS RIVER

 ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS WATER TEMPERATURE, DEG DISSOLVED OXYZEN, PPM
§ 234.13 Payment to a funeral home. The 1937 Act LSDP is paid to a funeral home under the following conditions: ( a ) A person who has assumed responsibility for all or part of the burial expenses files an application authorizing payment to the funeral home. Usually, the Board considers the person who makes the arrangements with the funeral home or makes a voluntary payment to the funeral home to be the person who has assumed responsibility for the burial expenses.
( b ) An official of the funeral home with unpaid expenses files an application on behalf of the funeral home after 90 days have elapsed from the date of the employee's death, if during that 90-day period no one has assumed responsibility for the payment of the burial expenses.
(Approved by the Office of Management and Budget under control number 3220-0031)
# C_2012334EN.01000701.xml

| 31.10.2012 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 334/7 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

31.10.2012

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 334/7

---

Summary information communicated by Member States on State aid granted in accordance with Commission Regulation (EC) No 736/2008 on the application of Articles 87 and 88 of the EC Treaty to State aid to small and medium-sized enterprises active in the production, processing and marketing of fisheries products

2012/C 334/05

Aid No: SA.35086 (12/XF)

Member State: Italy

Region/Authority granting the aid: Regione Abruzzo

Title of aid scheme/name of company receiving an ad hoc aid: cessazione temporanea delle attività di navi di pesca di stanza nel porto di Pescara abilitate al sistema a strascico.

Legal basis: Delibera della Giunta Regionale della Regione Abruzzo n. 404 del 25 giugno 2012 in materia di concessione di aiuti in regime di esenzione per la cessazione temporanea delle attività di prelievo ittico alle imprese armatrici di navi da pesca di stanza nel porto di Pescara abilitate al sistema a strascico.

Annual expenditure planned under the scheme or amount of ad hoc aid granted: EUR 780 000

Maximum aid intensity: 100 %

Date of entry into force:

Duration of aid scheme: Until the end of 2012

Objective of aid: Subsidy to cover the additional reduction of fishing effort during two additional periods of temporary cessation of activity: from 9 July 2012 to 5 August 2012 and from 18 September 2012 to 5 October 2012

Indicate which of Articles 8 to 24 is used: Article 9 of Regulation (EC) No 736/2008

Activity concerned: Trawling by vessels based at the port of Pescara

Name and address of the granting authority:

| Direzione Politiche Agricole e di Sviluppo Rurale, Forestale, Caccia e Pesca |
| --- |
| Servizio Adeguamento alla normativa comunitaria ed economia ittica |
| Via Catullo 17 |
| 65127 Pescara PE |
| ITALIA |

Direzione Politiche Agricole e di Sviluppo Rurale, Forestale, Caccia e Pesca

Servizio Adeguamento alla normativa comunitaria ed economia ittica

Via Catullo 17

65127 Pescara PE

ITALIA

Web address where the full text of the scheme or the criteria and conditions under which ad hoc aid is granted outside of an aid scheme can be found: http://www.regione.abruzzo.it/pesca

Motivation: Indicate why a State aid scheme has been established instead of assistance under the European Fisheries Fund:

A longer cessation of fishing activity subsidised by EFF resources is made impractical by the low level of remaining resources under Measure 1.20.

---
# C_2012072EN.01002201.xml

| 10.3.2012 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 72/22 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

10.3.2012

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 72/22

---

Authorisation for State aid pursuant to Articles 107 and 108 of the TFEU

Cases where the Commission raises no objections

(Text with EEA relevance, except for products falling under Annex I to the Treaty)

2012/C 72/02

| Date of adoption of the decision | 8.2.2012 |
| --- | --- |
| Reference number of State Aid | SA.34036 (11/N) |
| Member State | Spain |
| Region | Cataluna, Baleares, Andalucia, Murcia, Comunidad Valenciana | — |
| Title (and/or name of the beneficiary) | Real Decreto por el que se modifica el Real Decreto 1779/2008, de 3 de noviembre, por el que se establecen las bases reguladoras para la concesión de ayudas destinadas a la reconversión de plantaciones de determinados cítricos |
| Legal basis | Proyecto de Real Decreto .../2011, de ... de ..., por el que se modifica el Real Decreto 1799/2008, de 3 de noviembre por el que se establece las bases reguladoras para la concesión de ayudas destinadas a la reconversión de plantacciones de determinados cítricos. |
| Type of measure | Scheme | — |
| Objective | Investments in agricultural holdings |
| Form of aid | Direct grant |
| Budget | | Overall budget: EUR 15 million |

Date of adoption of the decision

8.2.2012

Reference number of State Aid

SA.34036 (11/N)

Member State

Spain

Region

Cataluna, Baleares, Andalucia, Murcia, Comunidad Valenciana

—

Title (and/or name of the beneficiary)

Real Decreto por el que se modifica el Real Decreto 1779/2008, de 3 de noviembre, por el que se establecen las bases reguladoras para la concesión de ayudas destinadas a la reconversión de plantaciones de determinados cítricos

Legal basis

Proyecto de Real Decreto .../2011, de ... de ..., por el que se modifica el Real Decreto 1799/2008, de 3 de noviembre por el que se establece las bases reguladoras para la concesión de ayudas destinadas a la reconversión de plantacciones de determinados cítricos.

Type of measure

Scheme

—

Objective

Investments in agricultural holdings

Form of aid

Direct grant

Budget

Overall budget: EUR 15 million

| | Annual budget: EUR 15 million |
| --- | --- |

Annual budget: EUR 15 million

Intensity

30 %

Duration (period)

Until 30.6.2013

Economic sectors

Growing of citrus fruits

Name and address of the granting authority

| Ministerio de Medio Ambiente y Medio Rural y Marino |
| --- |
| Paseo Infanta Isabel, 1 |
| 28014 Madrid |
| ESPAÑA |

Ministerio de Medio Ambiente y Medio Rural y Marino

Paseo Infanta Isabel, 1

28014 Madrid

ESPAÑA

Other information

—

The authentic text(s) of the decision, from which all confidential information has been removed, can be found at:

http://ec.europa.eu/community_law/state_aids/state_aids_texts_en.htm

---
#### Ernest Onetto, Plaintiff, v. Teutonia Fire Insurance Company, Defendant.

Plaintiff’s exceptions overruled, motion for new trial denied, with costs, and judgment directed for the defendant upon the nonsuit, with costs. All concurred; Lambert, J., not sitting.