alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
### §§1174, 1175. Transferred

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section 1174, Pub. L. 92–255, title IV, §407, Mar. 21, 1972, 86 Stat. 78; Pub. L. 94–237, §6(a), Mar. 19, 1976, 90 Stat. 244; Pub. L. 94–581, title I, §111(c)(2), Oct. 21, 1976, 90 Stat. 2852, which prohibited discrimination against drug abusers by general hospitals, was redesignated section 526 of the Public Health Service Act by Pub. L. 98–24, §2(b)(16)(B), Apr. 26, 1983, 97 Stat. 182, and is classified to section 290ee–2 of Title 42, The Public Health and Welfare.

Section 1175, Pub. L. 92–255, title IV, §408, Mar. 21, 1972, 86 Stat. 79; Pub. L. 93–282, title III, §303(a), (b), May 14, 1974, 88 Stat. 137, 138; Pub. L. 94–237, §4(c)(5)(A), (B), Mar. 19, 1976, 90 Stat. 244; Pub. L. 94–581, title I, §111(c)(3), Oct. 21, 1976, 90 Stat. 2852; Pub. L. 97–35, title IX, §973(d), Aug. 13, 1981, 95 Stat. 598, which related to confidentiality of patients' records, was redesignated section 527 of the Public Health Service Act by Pub. L. 98–24, §2(b)(16)(B), Apr. 26, 1983, 97 Stat. 182, and is classified to section 290ee–3 of Title 42.
EXHIBIT 21.1

SUBSIDIARIES OF BLACKROCK KELSO CAPITAL CORPORATION



|                       |  |             
|---------------------- |  | ------------
|Name                   |  | Jurisdiction
|BKC ASW Blocker, Inc.  |  | Delaware    
|BKC DVSH Blocker, Inc. |  | Delaware    
|BKC MTCH Blocker, Inc. |  | Delaware    

In addition, we may be deemed to control certain portfolio companies identified as Controlled
Investments in footnote (g) to the Schedule of Investments at December 31, 2008 included in the Financial Statements portion of BlackRock Kelso Capital Corporations Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2008.
(No. 74-CC-525

#### Presbyterian — St. Luke’s Hospital, Claimant, *vs.*State of Illinois, Department of Children and Family Services, Respondent.

*Opinion filed May 10, 1974.*

Gardner, Carton, Douglas, Chilgren and Waud, Attorney for Claimant.

William J. Scott, Attorney General; Saul R. Wexler, Assistant Attorney General, for Respondent.

Per Curiam.
# C_2012369EN.01000801.xml

| 29.11.2012 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 369/8 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

29.11.2012

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 369/8

---

Special report to the European Parliament made in accordance with Article 3(7) of the Statute of the European Ombudsman (1)

1

2012/C 369/07

The European Ombudsman addressed one special report to the European Parliament in 2012:

Special Report of 14 May 2012 following the European Ombudsman's inquiry into complaint 2591/2010/GG against the European Commission.

The text of the special report is available on the European Ombudsman's website at: http://www.ombudsman.europa.eu

Paper copies can be requested free of charge from the European Ombudsman's office:

| 1 avenue du Président Robert Schuman |
| --- |
| CS 30403 |
| 67001 Strasbourg Cedex |
| FRANCE |
| Tel. +33 388172313 |
| Fax +33 388179062 |
| E-mail: eo@ombudsman.europa.eu |

1 avenue du Président Robert Schuman

CS 30403

67001 Strasbourg Cedex

FRANCE

Tel. +33 388172313

Fax +33 388179062

E-mail: eo@ombudsman.europa.eu

---

(1)  Decision 94/262/ECSC, EC, Euratom of the European Parliament of 9 March 1994 on the regulations and general conditions governing the performance of the Ombudsman's duties, OJ L 113, 4.5.1994, p. 15.

1

---
Editorial Note on Part 416
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 416 appear at 68 FR 53509, Sept. 11, 2003.

§ 416.570 Adjustment. ( a ) *General.* When a recipient has been overpaid, the overpayment has not been refunded, and waiver of adjustment or recovery is not applicable, any payment due the overpaid recipient or his or her eligible spouse (or recovery from the estate of either or both when either or both die before adjustment is completed) is adjusted for recovery of the overpayment. Adjustment will generally be accomplished by withholding each month the amount set forth in § 416.571 from the benefit payable to the individual except that, when the overpayment results from the disposition of resources as provided by §§ 416.1240(b) and 416.1244, the overpayment will be recovered by withholding any payments due the overpaid recipient or his or her eligible spouse before any further payment is made. Absent a specific request from the person from whom recovery is sought, no overpayment made under title XVIII of the Act will be recovered by adjusting SSI benefits. In no case shall an overpayment of SSI benefits be adjusted against title XVIII benefits. No funds properly deposited into a dedicated account (see §§ 416.546 and 416.640(e)) can be used to repay an overpayment while the overpaid individual remains subject to the provisions of those sections.
( b ) *Overpayment made to representative payee after the recipient's death.* A representative payee or his estate is solely liable for repaying an overpayment made to the representative payee on behalf of a recipient after the recipient's death. In such case, we will recover the overpayment according to paragraph (a) of this section, except that: ( 1 ) We will not adjust any other payment due to the eligible spouse of the overpaid representative payee to recover the overpayment, and
( 2 ) If the overpaid representative payee dies before we complete adjustment, we will not seek to recover the overpayment from the eligible spouse or the estate of the eligible spouse.
[70 FR 16, Jan. 3, 2005, as amended at 73 FR 65543, Nov. 4, 2008]
Editorial Note on Part 416
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 416 appear at 68 FR 53509, Sept. 11, 2003.

§ 416.1227 When the resources excluded under a plan to achieve self-support begin to count. The resources that were excluded under the individual's plan will begin to be counted as of the first day of the month following the month in which any of these circumstances occur: ( a ) Failing to follow the conditions of the plan:
( b ) Abandoning the plan;
( c ) Completing the time schedule outlined in the plan; or
( d ) Reaching the goal as outlined in the plan.
[50 FR 42688, Oct. 22, 1985]
#### § 10.704 What penalties apply to representatives who collect a fee without approval?

Representatives who collect a fee without proper approval from OWCP may be charged with a misdemeanor under 18 U.S.C. 292.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

DAY HIGH

 14,964

 15,591

 16,361

 15,623

 15,958

 17,232

 16,641

 15,226

 15,377

 13,889

 11,997

 12,031

 11,464

 11,935

 12,075

 12,747

 13,112

 14,604

 15,279

 12,860

 13,926

 14,721

 13,444

 13,429

 13,325

 12,948

 13,691

 15,434

 14,594

 15,266

 5,923

 5,302

 4,960

 5,582

 4,841

 4,845

 5,859

 4,980

 5,563

 4,865

 4,768

 5,054

 4,890

 4,345

 4,487

 3,988

 3,886

 3,605

 3,613

 3,405

 3,331

 4,320

 4,042

 4,051

 4,569

 4,622

 5,390

 5,913

 6,430

 5,332

 9,177

 9,397

 9,633

 9,621

 9,613

 9,963

 10,577

 9,304

 9,596

 8,907

 8,262

 8,373

 7,934

 7,367

 7,293

 7,321

 7,573

 8,319

 9,204

 8,553

 8,739

 8,717

 8,282

 8,333

 8,417

 8,734

 9,318

 10,428

 9,623

 9,517

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

SEPTEMBER 2007 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: October 10, 2007

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

PITTSBURG BOTTOM ON THE SACRAMENTO RIVER
```

[Congressional Bills 114th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 4032 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

114th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 4032

     To amend the Immigration and Nationality Act to provide for a 
              limitation on the resettlement of refugees.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           November 17, 2015

   Mr. Poe of Texas (for himself, Mr. Sessions, Mr. Duncan of South 
Carolina, Mr. Blum, Mr. Loudermilk, Mr. Westerman, Mr. Smith of Texas, 
Mr. Farenthold, Mr. LaMalfa, Mr. Salmon, Mr. Babin, Mr. Weber of Texas, 
  Mr. Collins of Georgia, Mr. Conaway, and Mr. Massie) introduced the 
  following bill; which was referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
     To amend the Immigration and Nationality Act to provide for a 
              limitation on the resettlement of refugees.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``States' Right of Refugee Refusal Act 
of 2015''.

SEC. 2. LIMITATION ON RESETTLEMENT.

    Section 412 of the Immigration and Nationality Act (8 U.S.C. 1522) 
is amended by adding at the end the following:
    ``(g) Limitation on Resettlement.--Notwithstanding any other 
provision of this section, the Director or the Federal agency 
administering subsection (b)(1) may not resettle any refugee or 
coordinate placement of any refugee in a State when that State 
government has communicated to the Director that the State government 
does not accede to the resettlement or placement of refugees in that 
State.''.
                                 <all>
```
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR. R. 47.5.4.

** United States v. Booker, 543 U.S. 220 (2005). United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit 

### FILED August 8, 2007 Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk 

### IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 06-41615 Conference Calendar UNITED STATES OF AMERICA Plaintiff-Appellee v. JOSE RENE CARDONA-BLANCO Defendant-Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. 5:06-CR-850-1 Before DENNIS, CLEMENT, and PRADO, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: * Appealing the Judgment in a Criminal Case, Jose Rene Cardona-Blanco (Cardona) seeks to preserve for further review his contention that his sentence is unreasonable because this court’s post-Booker** ruli ngs have effectively rei nstated the mandatory Sentencing Guideline regime condemned in Booker
. Cardona concedes that his argument is foreclosed by United Statesv. Mares, 402No. 06-41615

2 F.3d 511 (5th Cir. 2005), and its progeny, which have outlined this court’s methodology for reviewing sentences for reasonableness. In light of Rita v. Unite d States, 127 S. Ct. 2456, 2462-68 (2007), the issue remains foreclosed. Cardona also raises arguments that are foreclosed by Almendarez-Torres v. United States, 523 U.S. 224, 235 (1998), which held that 8 U.S.C. § 1326(b)(2) is a penalty provision and not a separate criminal offense. The Government’s motion for summary affirmance is GRANTED, and thejudgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY ELEVATION

 252.51

 252.56

 252.66

 252.60

 252.60

 252.48

 252.50

 252.50

 252.56

 252.51

 252.54

 252.51

 252.56

 252.49

 252.54

 252.50

 252.51

 252.56

 252.50

 252.58

 252.51

 252.58

 252.49

 252.55

 252.50

 252.54

 252.49

 252.49

 252.52

 252.48

 252.51

 3,928

 3,953

 4,003

 3,973

 3,973

 3,914

 3,924

 3,924

 3,953

 3,928

 3,943

 3,928

 3,953

 3,919

 3,943

 3,924

 3,928

 3,953

 3,924

 3,963

 3,928

 3,963

 3,919

 3,948

 3,924

 3,943

 3,919

 3,919

 3,933

 3,914

 3,928

STORAGE

+34

+25

+50

-30

+0

-59

+10

+0

+29

-25

+15

-15

+25

-34

+24

-19

+4

+25

-29

+39

-35

+35

-44

+29

-24

+19

-24

+0

+14

-19

+14

CHANGE

 1,430

 1,563

 1,599

 1,606

 1,648

 1,573

 1,555

 1,551

 1,382

 1,267

 1,410

 1,214

 1,206

 1,199

 1,202

 1,178

 1,157

 1,084

 1,040

 1,064

 975

 793

 793

 872

 708

 700

 631

 583

 607

 631

 604

 14,430

 15,030

 14,430

 14,430

 13,110

 13,230

 13,310

 12,990

 12,030

 10,710

 11,070

 11,670

 15,550

 11,430

 11,310

 10,470

 9,990

 8,910

 8,790

 8,910

 8,790

 9,270

 8,670

 8,310

 8,670

 7,710

 7,950

 8,910

 8,910

 8,790

 8,670

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

AUGUST 2000 RED BLUFF DIVERSION RESERVOIR DAILY OPERATIONS RUN DATE: September 20, 2000

IN LAKE

CANAL

 ACRE-FEET

TOTALS +34 34,825 336,450

ACRE-FEET +34 69,075 667,349

SUMMARY

RELEASE (ACRE-FEET)

TOTAL 740,339

 3,894

RELEASE

RIVER

CORNING TO SACTO

CANAL

RELEASE C.F.S

TEHAMA

COLUSA

 60

 75

 97

 67

 92

 76

 55

 62

 58

 79

 56

 68

 72

 60

 58

 85

 72

 45

 57

 48

 34

 56

 86

 61

 60

 53

 76

 54

 53

 44

 55

 1,974

 3,915

CORNING CANAL 3,915

TEHAMA-COLUSA CANAL 69,075

TO SACTO RIVER 667,349

Table 9
EPA Registration Number 

82498-2

Vol. 1 




























































































































*Product ingredient source information may be entitled to confidential treatment*

*Product ingredient source information may be entitled to confidential treatment*

*Product ingredient source information may




























154
*Product ingredient source information may be entitled to confidential treatment*

*Product ingredient source information may be entitled to confidential treatment*
*Product ingredient source information may be entitled to confidential treatment*
_____________________________________

Page ______ is not included in this copy. 

Pages 159 through 160 are not included in this copy. 

_______________________________________________________________

The material not included contains the following type of 

information:

_____ Identity of product inert ingredients. 

_____ Identity of product impurities. 

_____ Description of the product manufacturing process. 

_____ Description of quality control procedures. 

_____ Identity of the source of product ingredients. 

_____ Sales or other commercial/financial information. 

_____ A draft product label. 

__X__ The product confidential statement of formula. 

_____ Information about a pending registration action. 

_____ FIFRA registration data. 

____ The document is a duplicate of page(s) ____. 

_____ The document is not responsive to the request. 

_____ Proprietary information pertaining to the chemical

 composition of an inert ingredient provided by the source

 of the ingredient. 

_____ Attorney-Client Privilege.

____ Claimed Confidential by submitter upon submission to the

 Agency. 

_____ Internal Deliberative Information. 

______ Blank page

* The information not included is generally considered confidential by product 

registrants. If you have any questions, please contact the individual who 

prepared the response to your request. 

_________________________________________________________________
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

DAY HIGH

 7,541

 8,257

 8,538

 12,128

 10,343

 11,049

 10,372

 10,182

 14,338

 11,101

 9,572

 8,852

 6,725

 6,176

 6,249

 5,561

 6,294

 6,125

 7,162

 6,448

 6,086

 6,693

 5,976

 4,866

 4,008

 3,273

 2,918

 2,780

 2,844

 3,119

 1,419

 1,949

 2,468

 2,771

 2,522

 2,354

 2,196

 2,361

 3,537

 2,364

 2,124

 1,955

 1,406

 1,267

 1,475

 1,364

 1,572

 1,634

 1,555

 1,201

 1,236

 1,240

 1,313

 1,308

 1,168

 1,046

 982

 967

 1,061

 1,243

 3,516

 3,973

 5,329

 6,191

 5,879

 5,703

 5,626

 5,978

 8,083

 6,344

 5,077

 4,781

 3,974

 3,218

 3,633

 3,241

 3,161

 3,422

 3,225

 3,043

 3,111

 3,014

 2,977

 2,542

 2,377

 2,097

 1,938

 1,819

 1,805

 1,869

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

JUNE 2013 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: September 18, 2013

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

PITTSBURG TOP ON THE SACRAMENTO RIVER
§ 404.1904 Effective date of a totalization agreement. Section 233 of the Social Security Act provides that a totalization agreement shall become effective on any date provided in the agreement if— ( a ) The date occurs after the expiration of a period during which at least one House of Congress has been in session on each of 60 days following the date on which the agreement is transmitted to Congress by the President; and
( b ) Neither House of Congress adopts a resolution of disapproval of the agreement within the 60-day period described in paragraph (a) of this section.
[49 FR 29775, July 24, 1984]
### SUBCHAPTER II—UNITED STATES ARMS CONTROL AND DISARMAMENT AGENCY
§ 335.3 Execution of statement of sickness and supplemental doctor's statement. ( a ) *Who may execute.* A statement of sickness and any required supplemental doctor's statement shall be executed by any of the following individuals: ( 1 ) A licensed medical doctor;
( 2 ) A licensed dentist if the infirmity relates to the teeth or gums;
( 3 ) A licensed podiatrist or chiropodist if the infirmity relates to the feet or toes;
( 4 ) A licensed chiropractor;
( 5 ) A clinical psychologist;
( 6 ) A certified nurse mid-wife;
( 7 ) The superintendent or other supervisory official of a hospital, clinic, or group health association, or similar organization, in which all examinations and treatment are conducted under the supervision of licensed medical doctors or under the supervision of licensed chiropractors, and in which medical records are maintained for each patient;
( 8 ) A physician assistant-certified (PAC);
( 9 ) An accredited Christian Science Practitioner;
( 10 ) A substance-abuse professional as defined in 49 CFR part 40.3, if the infirmity involves alcohol or controlled substances-related disorders; or
( 11 ) A nurse practitioner.
( b ) *Use of Board form or other form.* The statement of sickness and supplemental doctor's statement referred to in paragraph (a) of this section shall be completed on the forms prescribed by the Board, except that other standardized medical forms may be substituted if they provide the same information as that called for by the Board's forms.
[54 FR 43057, Oct. 20, 1989, as amended at 60 FR 40073, Aug. 7, 1995; 62 FR 44408, Aug. 21, 1997; 65 FR 66499, Nov. 6, 2000]
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

DAY HIGH

 231

 242

 255

 262

 268

 266

 263

 266

 266

 259

 249

 232

 225

 223

 222

 242

 258

 260

 268

 295

 302

 301

 293

 266

 251

 233

 233

 238

 163

 162

 162

 185

 202

 194

 216

 206

 222

 216

 214

 204

 167

 190

 179

 181

 195

 175

 203

 205

 212

 204

 168

 187

 166

 170

 173

 170

 195

 199

 206

 213

 224

 222

 232

 230

 237

 231

 230

 218

 203

 206

 203

 207

 216

 217

 228

 232

 250

 246

 233

 214

 207

 200

 202

 212

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

FEBRUARY 2005 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: March 4, 2005

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

RIO VISTA ON THE SACRAMENTO RIVER
#### § 404.1683 Hearings and appeals process.

The rules for hearings and appeals before the Board are provided in 45 CFR part 16. A notice under § 404.1680 of this subpart will be considered a “final written decision” for purposes of Board review.
(No. 74-CC-627

#### Bismarck Hotel, Claimant, *vs.*State of Illinois, Superintendent of Public Instruction, Respondent.

*Opinion filed May 10, 1974.*

Bismarck Hotel, Claimant, pro se.

William J. Scott, Attorney General; Saul R. Wexler, Assistant Attorney General, for Respondent.

Per Curiam.
#### § 404.731 Evidence you are a natural parent or child.

If you are the natural parent of the insured person, we will ask for a copy of his or her public or religious birth record made before age 5. If you are the natural child of the insured person, we will ask for a copy of your public or religious birth record made before age 5. In either case, if this record shows the same last name for the insured and the parent or child, we will accept it as convincing evidence of the relationship. However, if other evidence raises some doubt about this record or if the record cannot be gotten, we will ask for other evidence of the relationship. We may also ask for evidence of marriage of the insured person or of his or her parent if this is needed to remove any reasonable doubt about the relationship. To show you are the child of the insured person, you may be asked for evidence you would be able to inherit his or her personal property under State law where he or she had a permanent home (see § 404.770). In addition, we may ask for the insured persons signed statement that you are his or her natural child, or for a copy of any court order showing the insured has been declared to be your natural parent or any court order requiring the insured to contribute to you support because you are his or her son or daughter.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY HIGH

 19,320

 17,003

 21,612

 20,095

 18,531

 18,298

 16,674

 16,038

 14,603

 13,833

 16,504

 19,319

 18,604

 18,117

 17,043

 16,316

 16,664

 14,558

 14,366

 13,907

 13,895

 11,574

 11,664

 11,631

 13,160

 16,767

 17,989

 18,371

 18,816

 19,772

 18,721

 7,997

 7,858

 8,184

 7,930

 7,457

 8,125

 8,403

 7,206

 6,232

 6,581

 7,224

 8,840

 8,041

 6,718

 6,299

 6,390

 6,064

 5,844

 5,376

 5,198

 5,611

 6,123

 3,966

 3,948

 4,455

 5,790

 5,853

 6,616

 6,949

 7,154

 6,063

 12,805

 12,368

 13,384

 12,652

 12,590

 12,954

 12,390

 11,179

 9,705

 9,756

 10,804

 12,617

 13,276

 11,560

 10,901

 10,561

 9,987

 9,514

 9,148

 9,055

 9,601

 8,617

 7,267

 7,332

 8,371

 9,996

 10,578

 11,253

 11,896

 12,061

 11,175

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

DECEMBER 2009 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: January 4, 2010

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

PITTSBURG TOP ON THE SACRAMENTO RIVER
#### § 345.406 Defunct employer.

Whenever the Board determines, pursuant to § 345.207 of this part, that an employer is defunct, the Board will add the amount of such employer's benefit charges, as shown in its cumulative benefit balance, to the system unallocated charge balance.
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.

, Chief Justice

Stephen J. Markman

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano

Richard H. Bernstein

Joan L. Larsen,

Justices

I, Larry S. Royster , Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

November 2, 2016

p1026 

# Order

Clerk November 2, 2016

153331

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff

- Appellee,

v SC: 153331

COA: 324118

Kalamazoo CC: 201 4

- 000721

- FC

MARQUISE LARNELL WREN,

Defendant

- Appellant.

____________________________________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the January 19, 2016

judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, a nd it is DENIED, because we are not

persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.