alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
### §10305. Establishment and expansion of Regional Technology Officer Program

#### (a) Regional Technology Officer Program

#### (1) Establishment

The Secretary shall establish a program, which shall be known as the "Regional Technology Officer Program" (referred to in this section as the "Program").

#### (2) Goals

The goals of the Program shall include the following:

(A) Promoting United States leadership in technology abroad.

(B) Working with partners to increase the deployment of critical and emerging technology in support of democratic values.

(C) Shaping diplomatic agreements in regional and international fora with respect to critical and emerging technologies.

(D) Building diplomatic capacity for handling critical and emerging technology issues.

(E) Facilitating the role of critical and emerging technology in advancing the foreign policy objectives of the United States through engagement with research labs, incubators, and venture capitalists.

(F) Maintaining the advantages of the United States with respect to critical and emerging technologies.

#### (b) Implementation plan

Not later than 180 days after December 23, 2022, the Secretary shall submit an implementation plan to the appropriate congressional committees that outlines strategies for—

(1) advancing the goals described in subsection (a)(2);

(2) hiring Regional Technology Officers and increasing the competitiveness of the Program within the Foreign Service bidding process;

(3) expanding the Program to include a minimum of 15 Regional Technology Officers; and

(4) assigning not fewer than 2 Regional Technology Officers to posts within—

(A) each regional bureau of the Department; and

(B) the Bureau of International Organization Affairs.

#### (c) Annual briefing requirement

Not later than 180 days after December 23, 2022, and annually thereafter for the following 5 years, the Secretary shall brief the appropriate congressional committees regarding the status of the implementation plan required under subsection (b).

#### (d) Authorization of appropriations

There is authorized to be appropriated up to $25,000,000 for each of the fiscal years 2023 through 2027 to carry out this section.

(Pub. L. 117–263, div. I, title XCV, §9508, Dec. 23, 2022, 136 Stat. 3906.)

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Definitions

For definitions of "Secretary", "appropriate congressional committees", and "Department" as used in this section, see section 9002 of Pub. L. 117–263, set out as a note under section 2651 of this title.
#### § 216.92 Entitlement as a spouse or divorced spouse and as a survivor.

If an individual is entitled to both a spouse or divorced spouse and survivor annuity, only the larger annuity will be paid. However, if the individual so chooses, he or she can receive the smaller annuity rather than the larger annuity.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

DAY HIGH

 7,396

 6,273

 5,177

 4,241

 4,481

 4,480

 4,974

 6,257

 7,532

 8,154

 8,577

 8,128

 6,816

 7,546

 6,243

 6,263

 6,262

 6,847

 5,862

 4,198

 4,570

 5,159

 4,804

 5,763

 5,618

 7,975

 7,204

 7,310

 836

 1,042

 1,027

 940

 918

 868

 763

 755

 920

 884

 1,338

 1,143

 973

 1,147

 992

 1,000

 1,030

 1,181

 1,162

 935

 881

 923

 728

 789

 821

 959

 957

 1,073

 2,571

 2,528

 2,249

 2,050

 1,854

 1,671

 1,607

 1,990

 2,789

 3,458

 3,798

 3,831

 2,905

 3,220

 2,738

 2,523

 2,811

 3,547

 2,770

 1,873

 1,887

 2,173

 1,716

 1,973

 2,102

 3,040

 2,524

 2,861

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

FEBRUARY 2018 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: March 1, 2018

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

PITTSBURG TOP ON THE SACRAMENTO RIVER
**EXHIBIT32.2**

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO**

**18            USC, SECTION 1350,**

**AS            ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

In connection with the annual report of Northern Ethanol, Inc. (the            “Company”) on Form 10-KSB for the year ended December 31, 2007, as filed            with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the            “Report”), I, the undersigned, in the capacity and on the date indicated            below, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906            of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:

 

|   | 1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Rule                            13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|--------|----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

|   | 2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents,                            in all material respects, the financial condition and results of                            operations of the Company. |
|--------|----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

 

| Dated: April 16, 2008 | s/Richard Smith 

Richard Smith, Chief Financial Officer |
|-----------------------|---------------------------------------------------------------|
#### § 408.1002 What is an initial determination?

Initial determinations are the determinations we make that are subject to administrative and judicial review. The initial determination will state the important facts and give the reasons for our conclusions. We will base our initial determination on the preponderance of the evidence.

[69 FR 25955, May 10, 2004, as amended at 73 FR 76944, Dec. 18, 2008]
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

DAY HIGH

 2,374

 1,840

 1,942

 2,482

 3,895

 5,305

 6,010

 8,768

 8,766

 9,806

 11,306

 12,260

 11,804

 10,682

 9,263

 8,320

 7,078

 7,205

 7,393

 8,172

 10,410

 9,893

 11,093

 11,401

 11,042

 11,221

 10,698

 9,740

 8,944

 7,397

 457

 376

 328

 306

 419

 601

 811

 1,077

 904

 913

 1,642

 2,369

 2,039

 2,087

 1,687

 1,846

 1,356

 1,639

 1,800

 2,256

 2,540

 2,080

 2,107

 1,927

 2,145

 2,366

 2,013

 2,083

 1,695

 1,266

 1,139

 824

 894

 956

 1,300

 1,911

 2,629

 3,527

 3,272

 3,830

 5,479

 6,596

 6,216

 5,833

 5,021

 4,671

 4,188

 3,977

 3,846

 4,596

 4,992

 4,843

 5,212

 5,337

 5,492

 5,792

 5,567

 5,218

 4,761

 4,106

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

JUNE 2002 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: July 8, 2002

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

PITTSBURG BOTTOM ON THE SACRAMENTO RIVER
**Printed on 100% recycled/recyclable paper with 100% post -**  **consumer fiber and process chlorine free. Customer Service**  **Hotline: 1 -**  **800 -**  **438 -**  **2474** Dec 10, 2012 Mr. David K. Pay lor Virginia Department of Environmental Quality 629 East Main Street Richmond, Virginia 23219 Dear Director Pay lor : On July 23 , 2012, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) received a revision to the Virginia State I mplementation Plan (SI P) from the Virginia Department of Environmental Quality (VADEQ ). The SIP revision addresses the applicable infrastructure elements speci fied in section 110(a)(2)(A) through (M) of the Clean Air Act (CAA) which are necessary to implement, maintain, and enforce the 2008 ozone national ambient air quality standards (NAAQS) in the Commonwealth of Virginia
. EPA has determined that the submitta l is administra tively and technicall y complete , and is reviewing it to prepare a Notice of Proposed Rulemaking (NPR). If members of your staff have an y questions, they may direct them to Ms. Ruth Knapp , Office of Air Program Planning, at (215) 814
- 2191 , or knapp
. ruth @epa.gov
. She is the principal contact for this rulemaking
. Sincerel y, /s/ Diana Esher, Director Air Protection Division

cc: Michael Dowd, Air Division Director Virginia Department of Environmental Quality
### §491. Omitted

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section, Pub. L. 85–864, title V, §511, Sept. 2, 1958, 72 Stat. 1593; Pub. L. 87–344, title II, §204(d), Oct. 3, 1961, 75 Stat. 760; Pub. L. 88–210, title II, §205(e), formerly §25(e), Dec. 18, 1963, 77 Stat. 418, renumbered Pub. L. 90–576, title I, §101(a)(1), Oct. 16, 1968, 82 Stat. 1064; Pub. L. 88–665, title V, §505, Oct. 16, 1964, 78 Stat. 1106, authorized appropriations for the years ending June 30, 1959 and 1960 and the eight succeeding fiscal years for operation by institutes of higher education of institutes for advanced study. For further details see Codification note set out under section 481 of this title.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY HIGH

 114

 115

 111

 105

 105

 107

 106

 108

 110

 124

 124

 115

 105

 99

 98

 94

 96

 96

 94

 93

 93

 95

 98

 96

 99

 99

 99

 98

 102

 105

 98

 105

 105

 101

 99

 99

 99

 99

 99

 99

 97

 95

 93

 92

 92

 90

 89

 90

 90

 90

 87

 87

 87

 87

 89

 94

 93

 92

 92

 92

 90

 90

 110

 108

 107

 101

 101

 102

 101

 102

 102

 105

 103

 99

 96

 95

 93

 91

 92

 93

 92

 90

 88

 90

 92

 93

 95

 95

 95

 94

 95

 94

 93

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

MAY 2020 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: June 2, 2020

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

RIO VISTA ON THE SACRAMENTO RIVER
**Exhibit 23.3**

**Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm**

The Board of Directors

Community Bankers Trust Corporation 

We consent to the inclusion of our reports dated April 22, 2010, relating to the consolidated financial statements of TransCommunity FinancialCorporation and BOE Financial Services of Virginia, Inc. as of May 31, 2008 and for the five-month period ended May 31, 2008, which reports appear in the Community Bankers Trust Corporation’s Annual Report on Form 10-K/A (Amendment No. 4) forthe year ended December 31, 2008.

/s/ Elliott Davis, LLC 

Galax, Virginia 

April 8, 2011
**EXHBIT 99.7**             

**Consent of Independent Registered Chartered Accountants**

 

We consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration Statement No. 333-128128 on Form S-8 and to the use of our reports dated March 24, 2009 relating to the consolidated financial statements of Silver Wheaton Corp. (which report expresses an unqualified opinion and includes an explanatory paragraph relating to the adoption of Canadian Institute of Chartered Accountants Handbook Sections            1530 - Comprehensive Income, 3251 - Equity, 3855 - Financial Instruments – Recognition and Measurement, 3861 - Financial Instruments – Disclosure and Presentation and 3865 - Hedges, effective January 1, 2007) and the effectiveness of Silver Wheaton Corp.’s internal control over financial reporting appearing in this Amendment No. 1 to Annual Report on Form 40-F of Silver Wheaton Corp. for the year ended December 31, 2008.

 

/s/ DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP

 

Independent Registered Chartered Accountants

            Vancouver, Canada

March 31, 2009
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

MIDDLE DISTRICT

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

Respondent

v.

LISA SMITH,

Petitioner :

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

: No. 410 MAL 2021

Petition for Allowance of Appeal from the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW , this 15 th day of December, 2021, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal

is GRANTED LIMITED TO the issue set forth below. Allocatur is DENIED as to all

remaining issues. The issue, rephrased for clarity, is:

(1) Whether the Superior Court erred in affirming the trial court’s admission of

the statement of Petitioner’s co

- defendant in violation of this Court’s precedent interpreting Bruton v. United States , 391 U.S. 123 (1968), specifically Commonwealth v. Rainey , 928 A.2d 216 (Pa. 2007) and

Commonwealth v. Johnson , 378 A.2d 859 (Pa. 1977)?
EXHIBIT 23.1


            CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM


To the Board of Directors and Stockholders:
People's Liberation, Inc. and Subsidiaries

We consent to the  incorporation  by reference and inclusion in the Registration
Statements on Form S-8 (SEC File Nos.  333-152961  and  333-134672)  of People's
Liberation,   Inc.  of  our  report  dated  March  27,  2009,  relating  to  the
consolidated financial statements of People's Liberation, Inc. and subsidiaries,
which report appears in this Annual Report on Form 10-K of People's  Liberation,
Inc. for the year ended December 31, 2008.


/s/ Crowe Horwath LLP
------------------------
Sherman Oaks, California
March 27, 2009
Exhibit 31.1**CERTIFICATIONS**          I, Michael K. Farrell, certify that:          1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of MetLife Insurance Company ofConnecticut;          2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material factor omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of thecircumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this report;          3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information includedin this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results ofoperations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;          4. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have: a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosurecontrols and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that materialinformation relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, ismade known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period inwhich this report is being prepared;  b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls andprocedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of thedisclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this reportbased on such evaluation; and  c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter(the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that hasmaterially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’sinternal control over financial reporting; and          5. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the auditcommittee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions): a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operationof internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adverselyaffect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financialinformation; and  b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employeeswho have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting.Date:August 10, 2007     /s/Michael K. Farrell   Michael K. Farrell*President*
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1998
<CASH>                                          21,269
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   55,055
<ALLOWANCES>                                    17,307
<INVENTORY>                                     13,752
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                81,187
<PP&E>                                         738,509
<DEPRECIATION>                                 101,172
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 743,173
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           63,528
<BONDS>                                        370,368
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           248
<OTHER-SE>                                     291,097
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   743,173
<SALES>                                        301,933
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               301,933
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  251,338
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 3,246
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              18,228
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 29,121
<INCOME-TAX>                                    10,629
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             18,492
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    18,492
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.75
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.73
        

</TABLE>
§ 1002.266 What are the obligations of a multiemployer pension benefit plan under USERRA? A multiemployer pension benefit plan is one to which more than one employer is required to contribute, and which is maintained pursuant to one or more collective bargaining agreements between one or more employee organizations and more than one employer. The Act uses ERISA's definition of a multiemployer plan. In addition to the provisions of USERRA that apply to all pension benefit plans, there are provisions that apply specifically to multiemployer plans, as follows: ( a ) The last employer that employed the employee before the period of service is responsible for making the employer contribution to the multiemployer plan, if the plan sponsor does not provide otherwise. If the last employer is no longer functional, the plan must nevertheless provide coverage to the employee.
( b ) An employer that contributes to a multiemployer plan and that reemploys the employee pursuant to USERRA must provide written notice of reemployment to the plan administrator within 30 days after the date of reemployment. The returning service member should notify the reemploying employer that he or she has been reemployed pursuant to USERRA. The 30-day period within which the reemploying employer must provide written notice to the multiemployer plan pursuant to this subsection does not begin until the employer has knowledge that the employee was reemployed pursuant to USERRA.
( c ) The employee is entitled to the same employer contribution whether he or she is reemployed by the pre-service employer or by a different employer contributing to the same multiemployer plan, provided that the pre-service employer and the post-service employer share a common means or practice of hiring the employee, such as common participation in a union hiring hall.
# C_2012187EN.01000501.xml

| 27.6.2012 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 187/5 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

27.6.2012

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 187/5

---

Explanatory Notes to the Combined Nomenclature of the European Union

2012/C 187/06

Pursuant to Article 9(1)(a), second indent, of Council Regulation (EEC) No 2658/87 of 23 July 1987 on the tariff and statistical nomenclature and on the Common Customs Tariff (1), the Explanatory Notes to the Combined Nomenclature of the European Union (2) are amended as follows:

1

2

On page 374, the following text is inserted:

On page 374, the following text is inserted:

‘8714 99 50   Derailleur gears

Derailleur gears of this subheading are mechanisms that enable the chain of a bicycle to be moved on the front sprockets or on the rear sprockets. A complete derailleur gear set usually consists of at least one derailleur (front or rear, see images) and a shift lever attached to the derailleur by a cable. When a rider operates the lever while pedalling, the change in cable tension moves the derailleur from side to side, “derailing” the chain onto different sprockets.

This subheading also covers front or rear derailleurs presented separately as well as sets consisting of these derailleurs with cables or shift levers unassembled. However, presented separately, shift levers and cables are to be classified in subheading 8714 99 90 as parts.

Image

Image

---

(1)  OJ L 256, 7.9.1987, p. 1.

1

(2)  OJ C 137, 6.5.2011, p. 1.

2

---
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 13-1876

EVERTON BROWN,

 Plaintiff – Appellant,

v.

U.S. DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE,

 Defendant - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of 

Maryland, at Baltimore. William D. Quarles, Jr., District 

Judge. (1:12-cv-01954-WDQ)

Submitted: September 26, 2013 Decided: September 30, 2013

Before SHEDD, DUNCAN, and WYNN, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Everton Brown, Appellant Pro Se. Neil R. White, Assistant United 

States Attorney, Greenbelt, Maryland, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Everton Brown appeals the district court’s order 

dismissing his civil action seeking relief under the Freedom of 

Information Act, 5 U.S.C.A. § 552 (West 2007 & Supp. 2013), for 

lack of subject matter jurisdiction. We have reviewed the 

record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for 

the reasons stated by the district court. Brown v. United 

States Dep’t of Justice, No. 1:12-cv-01954-WDQ (D. Md. June 12, 

2013). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and 

legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials 

before this court and argument would not aid the decisional 

process.

AFFIRMED
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

OFFICE OF DISCIPLINARY COUNSEL,

Petitioner

v.

MICHAEL BRANDON COHEN,

Respondent

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 2957 Disciplinary Docket No. 3

No. 29 DB 2023

Attorney Registration No. 308651

(Blair County)

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 8

th day of March, 2023, upon consideration of the Verified 

Statement of Resignation, Michael Brandon Cohen is disbarred on consent from the Bar 

of this Commonwealth. See Pa.R.D.E. 215. Respondent shall comply with the provisions 

of Pa.R.D.E. 217 and pay costs to the Disciplinary Board. See Pa.R.D.E. 208(g).