alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

DAY ELEV

 218.53

 219.95

 220.91

 220.86

 220.10

 219.84

 222.94

 221.82

 221.74

 223.15

 223.23

 223.01

 221.88

 222.29

 220.92

 221.03

 221.38

 220.79

 221.28

 220.43

 220.71

 219.72

 220.81

 220.95

 219.86

 220.67

 222.09

 222.69

 222.37

 222.53

 39,398

 43,023

 45,525

 45,394

 43,411

 42,738

 50,886

 47,914

 47,703

 51,447

 51,661

 51,073

 48,071

 49,155

 45,551

 45,839

 46,758

 45,210

 46,495

 44,270

 45,001

 42,428

 45,263

 45,629

 42,790

 44,897

 48,624

 50,219

 49,368

 49,793

STORAGE

-983

+3,625

+2,502

-131

-1,983

-673

+8,148

-2,972

-211

+3,744

+214

-588

-3,002

+1,084

-3,604

+288

+919

-1,548

+1,285

-2,225

+731

-2,573

+2,835

+366

-2,839

+2,107

+3,727

+1,595

-851

+425

CHANGE

1,764

2,008

1,957

1,760

1,615

826

453

1,821

2,033

2,146

2,193

2,211

1,847

1,583

1,627

1,633

1,618

1,430

855

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

PUMPING

 4,694

 3,659

 2,985

 3,869

 4,009

 4,433

 3,793

 4,516

 2,145

 1,293

 1,834

 1,993

 3,038

 2,057

 2,576

 1,888

 1,843

 2,333

 2,323

 2,214

 2,576

 3,666

 2,200

 2,305

 2,450

 2,612

 2,627

 2,218

 3,163

 2,848

PUMPING

 552

 576

 0

 1,021

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 369

 2,680

 2,956

 2,927

 2,030

 3,518

 1,927

 2,142

 1,710

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

PUMPING

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 281

 740

 625

 475

 364

 587

 782

 905

 935

 917

 924

 987

GEN.

*

+97

+417

-447

+371

-321

+4

-794

+164

-74

+145

+272

+435

+572

+204

+318

-12

+300

+165

-34

-33

-339

-27

+82

-133

-201

+134

-229

+114

-39

+378

OR

UNITED STATES 

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION

CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT

CONSOLIDATED STATE-FEDERAL O'NEILL FOREBAY May 22, 2001

DAILY OPERATIONS

APRIL 2001 RUN DATE:

IN LAKE GEN.

ACRE-FEET O'NEILL

RELEASE - C.F.S. 

TOTALS +9,412 31,380 8,522 22,408 84,160 +1,489

ACRE-FEET +9,412 62,242 16,903 44,446 166,931

SUMMARY

 726

RELEASE (ACRE-FEET)

O'NEILL GEN. 16,903

SAN LUIS PUMP 44,446 726

 40,381

DOS AMIGOS PUMP 166,931

DELIVERIES 

S. LUIS O'NEILL

 0

 868

 0

 0

 0

 1,897

 7,611

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 1,565

 3,908

 2,871

 3,911

 3,208

 2,001

 4,217

 4,932

 3,211

 2,491

 3,849

 46,540

 92,312

CALIF. DOS AMIGOS

AQUEDUCT

2,889

2,770

2,737

2,693

1,715

1,367

631

1,033

79

1,259

2,156

2,007

2,032

2,847

2,331

2,339

2,530

1,667

2,431

300

0

0

0

0

0

229

738

613

1,205

189

 40,787

 80,901

S. LUIS

DELIV.

GAINS(+)

LOSS(-)

C.F.S.

INFLOW - C.F.S

STATE OF CALIFORNIA

THE RESOURCES AGENCY

DEPARTMENT OF WATER RESOURCES

STATE WATER PROJECT

TOTAL 229,006

 2,953

* DAILY DEL. FIGURES UNAVAILABLE. TOT. DEL. IS INCLUDED IN COMPUTING MONTHLY TOTALS 

Table 18
#### In the Matter of the Arbitration between Samuel Swislocki and Ephraim Spiewak.

Motion for leave to appeal to the Court of Appeals denied, with $10 costs. Present — Peek, P. J., Glennon, Cohn, Yan Yoorhis and Shientag, JJ. [See *ante,*p. 768.]
#### Hays et al. v. Greasy Brush Coal Co. et al.

Oct. 16, 1942.

H. H. Owens and James M. Hays for appellant.

Stephens & Steely, William Hays, J. Smith Hays, J. J. Tye, Golden & Lay and H. L. Bryant for appellee.

Opinion of the Court by

Sims, Commissioner—

Dismissing Appeal.

*614This is the second appeal of this case. Two suits were brought to quiet title to a tract of land containing 13.75 acres, ownership of which was asserted by three different parties. The cases were heard together in the circuit court and both were disposed of in one opinion here.

In' quieting the title of the Greasy Brush Coal Company to this land, the chancellor adjudged the Company should recover its costs against James M. Hays and Minerva Prances Hays in one action, and in the other action that the Company should recover its costs against the Puson heirs. Also, in this second action it was adjudged that the Company should recover against the Hayses certain costs incurred by reason'of their cross-petition. As is customary, these costs "were adjudged the Company in the abstract and not in particular amounts. This judgment was affirmed on the former appeal reported in 288 Ky. 774, 157 S. W. (2d) 75.

After the mandate issued, the Company moved the chancellor to require the clerk to separate his bill of cost and show just how much was taxed against it for which it was given judgment against the Puson heirs and the Hayses. The chancellor sustained this motion and entered an order directing that the Company recover the specific sum of $277.20 in cost from James M. and Minerva Prances Hays, who filed their motion in this court under Section 21.060 KRS [Section 950-1 KS] praying an appeal.

No appeal is allowed to this court from a judgment involving only an item of cost. Siddens v. Ennis, 217 Ky. 810, 290 S. W. 669 ; Howard v. Cockrell, 237 Ky. 504, 35 S. W. (2d) 884, Section 21.060 KRS [Section 950-1 KS].

This court having no jurisdiction to hear this motion for an appeal, same is dismissed.
#### Sarah E. McDonald, Appellant, v. Lambert H. Weinheimer, Respondent.

Appeal dismissed, without costs, upon stipulation filed.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

DAY ELEV

 1,045.56

 1,045.61

 1,045.66

 1,045.86

 1,045.99

 1,046.12

 1,046.25

 1,046.35

 1,046.49

 1,046.54

 1,046.70

 1,047.35

 1,048.90

 1,049.10

 1,050.61

 1,051.02

 1,051.65

 1,051.86

 1,051.82

 1,051.67

 1,051.52

 1,051.35

 1,051.60

 1,051.78

 1,051.73

 1,051.67

 1,052.66

 1,052.82

 1,053.00

 1,926.6

 1,927.1

 1,927.7

 1,929.8

 1,931.3

 1,932.7

 1,934.1

 1,935.2

 1,936.7

 1,937.2

 1,939.0

 1,946.0

 1,962.9

 1,965.1

 1,981.7

 1,986.2

 1,993.2

 1,995.5

 1,995.0

 1,993.4

 1,991.7

 1,989.9

 1,992.6

 1,994.6

 1,994.0

 1,993.4

 2,004.3

 2,006.1

 2,008.1

STORAGE

+0.5

+0.5

+0.5

+2.2

+1.4

+1.4

+1.4

+1.1

+1.5

+0.5

+1.7

+7.1

+16.9

+2.2

+16.6

+4.5

+7.0

+2.3

-0.4

-1.7

-1.7

-1.9

+2.8

+2.0

-0.6

-0.7

+11.0

+1.8

+2.0

CHANGE

282

314

307

1,222

716

725

743

582

2,095

787

887

3,632

8,527

1,104

8,375

2,340

4,595

3,002

3,232

2,684

1,688

693

3,576

3,585

2,319

1,191

6,636

4,189

3,247

INFLOW

 6

 13

 13

 100

 0

 14

 0

 2

 1,269

 481

 1

 2

 1

 0

 0

 13

 1,072

 1,812

 3,433

 3,494

 2,508

 1,607

 2,171

 2,566

 2,576

 1,500

 1,050

 3,282

 2,185

POWER

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

SPILL

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

OUTLET

 3

 28

 21

 32

 7

 0

 32

 32

 60

 32

 11

 67

 0

 0

 18

 53

 18

 21

 21

 25

 14

 32

 14

 18

 21

 25

 65

 14

 57

C.F.S.

 .01

 .08

 .06

 .09

 .02

 .00

 .09

 .09

 .17

 .09

 .03

 .19

 .00

 .00

 .05

 .15

 .05

 .06

 .06

 .07

 .04

 .09

 .04

 .05

 .06

 .07

 .18

 .04

 .16

INCHES

 .01

 .00

 .00

 .40

 .02

 .05

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .34

 .53

 1.50

 .94

 1.41

 .55

 .34

 .39

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .88

 .02

 1.31

 .02

 .00

 .00

 1.18

 1.27

 .12

PRECIP

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

FEBRUARY 2000 NEW MELONES LAKE DAILY OPERATIONS RUN DATE: March 14, 2000

IN LAKE

EVAPORATION

INCHES

C.F.S.

COMPUTED*

1000 ACRE-FEET

RELEASE - C.F.S.

TOTALS +81.9 73,275 31,171 0 0 741 2.09 11.28

ACRE-FEET +81,900 145,341 61,828 0 0 1,470

COMMENTS:

* COMPUTED INFLOW IS THE SUM OF CHANGE IN STORAGE, RELEASES AND EVAPORATION.

SUMMARY

RELEASE (ACRE-FEET)

POWER 61,828

SPILL 0

OUTLET

TOTAL

 0

 61,828

PRECIPITATION

THIS MONTH =

TO DATE =

 11.28

JULY 1, 1999 23.94

 1,926.1

Table 13
**EXHIBIT 23.2**

 

**CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS**

 

We consent tothe incorporation by reference in Registration Statement No. 33-57308,No. 33-59697, No. 333-36497 and No. 333-61816 of AmeronInternational Corporation on Form S-8 of our reports dated February 3,2003 (February 24, 2004 as to the effects of the stock split described inNote 16), appearing in this Annual Report on Form 10-K of AmeronInternational Corporation for the year ended November 30, 2003.

 
| /s/ Deloitte  & Touche LLP |   |
|--------------------------------|--------|
| Los Angeles,  California       |
| February 24,  2004        |

 

----
§ 229.41 When a spouse can no longer be included in computing an annuity rate under the overall minimum. A spouse's inclusion in the computation of the overall minimum rate ends the earlier of: ( a ) The month before the month in which the spouse dies; or
( b ) The month before the month in which the spouse's marriage to the employee legally terminates; or
( c ) If the spouse has an eligible child in care, the earlier of the month before the month in which the child leaves the spouse's care, attains age 16 and is not disabled, or, if disabled, recovers from being disabled; or
( d ) The month before the month the employee dies.
### §196. Repealed. July 1, 1944, ch. 373, title XIII, §1313, 58 Stat. 714

Section, act June 14, 1930, ch. 488, §4(b), (c), 46 Stat. 587; 1939 Reorg. Plan No. I, §§201, 205, eff. July 1, 1939, 4 F.R. 2728, 53 Stat. 1424, related to studies and investigations by Surgeon General of the Public Health Service. See section 242 of Title 42, The Public Health and Welfare.

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Renumbering of Repealing Act

Title XIII, §1313, formerly title VI, §611, of act July 1, 1944, which repealed these sections, was renumbered title VII, §711, by act Aug. 13, 1946, ch. 958, §5, 60 Stat. 1049; §713, by act Feb. 28, 1948, ch. 83, §9(b), 62 Stat. 47; title VIII, §813, by act July 30, 1956, ch. 779, §3(b), 70 Stat. 721; title IX, §913, by Pub. L. 88–581, §4(b), Sept. 4, 1964, 78 Stat. 919; title X, §1013, by Pub. L. 89–239, §3(b), Oct. 6, 1965, 79 Stat. 931; title XI, §1113, by Pub. L. 91–572, §6(b), Dec. 24, 1970, 84 Stat. 1506; title XII, §1213, by Pub. L. 92–294, §3(b), May 16, 1972, 86 Stat. 137; title XIII, §1313, by Pub. L. 93–154, §2(b)(2), Nov. 16, 1973, 87 Stat. 604, and was repealed by Pub. L. 93–222, §7(b), Dec. 29, 1973, 87 Stat. 936.
Exhibit (10)(a)

















Consent of Ernst & Young LLP, Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm












We consent to the reference to our firm under the caption "Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm" in Post-Effective Amendment No. 17 to the 1933 Act Registration Statement (Form N-4 No. 333-181617) and Amendment No. 354 to the 1940 Act Registration Statement (Form N-4 No. 811-08441), and to the use therein of our reports dated (a) April 2, 2018, with respect to the financial statements of Lincoln Life & Annuity Company of New York and (b) April 12, 2018, with respect to the financial statements of Lincoln Life & Annuity Variable Annuity Account H for the registration of interests in a separate account under individual flexible payment deferred variable annuity contracts.


 


/s/ Ernst & Young LLP









Philadelphia, Pennsylvania


November 13, 2018
### SUBCHAPTER VI—FUNDING FOR PROMOTION OF DEMOCRACY
### subpart v—disadvantaged children in asia
Order entered September 16, 2020

In The

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-19-01445-CV

MONTGOMERY J. BENNETT AND

EVAN LANE (VAN) SHAW, Appellants

V.

MATTHEW ZUCKER, Appellee

On Appeal from the 330th Judicial District Court

Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. DF-19-17721

ORDER

Before the Court is appellants’ September 14, 2020 unopposed motion for a 

three-day extension of time to file their brief. We GRANT the motion and 

ORDER the brief be filed no later than September 17, 2020.

/s/ ROBERT D. BURNS, III

CHIEF JUSTICE
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

DAY ELEVATION

 238.68

 238.66

 238.70

 238.70

 238.79

 238.81

 238.93

 239.84

 239.96

 240.15

 240.20

 240.09

 240.35

 240.00

 239.98

 239.96

 240.00

 239.18

 238.85

 238.77

 239.01

 239.00

 238.87

 238.80

 238.77

 238.85

 238.88

 239.10

 239.14

 239.28

 317

 315

 319

 319

 329

 331

 343

 451

 465

 491

 498

 482

 518

 470

 468

 465

 470

 372

 335

 327

 351

 350

 337

 330

 327

 335

 338

 362

 367

 384

STORAGE

-4

-2

+4

+0

+10

+2

+12

+108

+14

+26

+7

-16

+36

-48

-2

-3

+5

-98

-37

-8

+24

-1

-13

-7

-3

+8

+3

+24

+5

+17

CHANGE

 269

 270

 269

 243

 211

 211

 245

 159

 267

 249

 213

 262

 213

 313

 306

 310

 335

 306

 322

 311

 305

 252

 365

 306

 323

 339

 244

 220

 218

 312

 8,335

 8,116

 8,412

 8,629

 8,734

 8,647

 8,993

 15,677

 16,124

 16,781

 17,129

 16,837

 17,336

 15,112

 14,763

 14,584

 14,612

 9,426

 8,365

 8,019

 8,394

 8,621

 8,114

 7,883

 7,641

 8,293

 8,374

 9,487

 9,673

 10,262

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

APRIL 2004 RED BLUFF DIVERSION RESERVOIR DAILY OPERATIONS RUN DATE: May 20, 2004

IN LAKE

CANAL

 ACRE-FEET

TOTALS +63 8,168 331,373

ACRE-FEET +63 16,201 657,278

SUMMARY

RELEASE (ACRE-FEET)

TOTAL 675,072

 321

RELEASE

RIVER

CORNING TO SACTO

CANAL

RELEASE C.F.S

TEHAMA

COLUSA

 18

 12

 0

 16

 16

 42

 33

 41

 27

 34

 39

 20

 27

 9

 6

 10

 6

 15

 4

 16

 15

 12

 35

 50

 69

 52

 59

 60

 49

 11

 803

 1,593

CORNING CANAL 1,593

TEHAMA-COLUSA CANAL 16,201

TO SACTO RIVER 657,278

Table 9
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY HIGH

 12,471

 11,058

 11,218

 11,532

 11,183

 11,123

 11,339

 11,845

 13,049

 14,663

 14,732

 13,111

 10,821

 9,661

 8,225

 3,462

 1,366

 1,123

 870

 681

 542

 449

 473

 376

 348

 315

 298

 282

 266

 302

 358

 4,178

 3,565

 3,291

 3,585

 3,722

 3,452

 3,913

 3,699

 4,615

 6,075

 4,771

 2,577

 1,651

 1,300

 896

 1,045

 357

 291

 237

 273

 255

 263

 269

 276

 269

 256

 238

 231

 219

 223

 225

 7,821

 6,495

 7,131

 7,562

 7,828

 7,968

 7,342

 7,624

 8,209

 9,542

 8,990

 7,594

 5,688

 4,203

 3,826

 2,093

 809

 650

 522

 435

 362

 320

 340

 318

 307

 286

 268

 254

 243

 241

 249

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

DECEMBER 2016 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: January 5, 2017

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

PITTSBURG TOP ON THE SACRAMENTO RIVER
##### Table of Contents



UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
 Washington, D.C. 20549
 FORM 8-K
 CURRENT REPORT
Pursuant to Section 13 or 15 (d) of The Securities Exchange Act of 1934
 July 6, 2011
 Date of Report (Date of earliest event reported)
 FOREST LABORATORIES, INC.
  Delaware(State or other jurisdiction 
of incorporation)
    
    1-5438(Commission
File Number)
    
    11-1798614(IRS Employer
Identification No.)
 909 Third AvenueNew York, New York
    
    10022-4731(Address of principal executive offices)
    
    (Zip Code)
 (212) 421-7850
 (Registrants telephone number, including area code)
  (Former name or former address, if changed since last report)
 Check the appropriate box below if the Form 8-K filing is intended to simultaneously satisfy the
filing obligation of the registrant under any of the following provisions:
 o
    
    Written communications pursuant to Rule 425 under the Securities Act (17 CFR 230.425)o
    
    Soliciting material pursuant to Rule 14a-12 under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.14a-12)o
    
    Pre-commencement communications pursuant to Rule 14d-2(b) under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.14d-2(b))o
    
    Pre-commencement communications pursuant to Rule 13e-4(c) under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.13e-4(c))




---



TABLE OF CONTENTS  Item 3.01 Notice of Delisting or Failure to Satisfy a Continued Listing Rule or Standard; Transfer of ListingItem 9.01 Financial Statements and ExhibitsSIGNATURESExhibit IndexEX-99.1    Table of Contents  
 Item 3.01 Notice of Delisting or Failure to Satisfy a Continued Listing Rule or Standard; Transfer
of Listing
 Forest NYSE Letter Exchange
  DTCC Broadridge
  
 Item 9.01 Financial Statements and Exhibits.
 
  Exhibit No.
    
    Exhibit Description99.1
    
    Letter to Forest Laboratories, Inc., dated July 6, 2011, from NYSE Regulation




---



##### Table of Contents



SIGNATURES
   Forest Laboratories, Inc.(Registrant)/s/ Francis I. Perier, Jr.Francis I. Perier, Jr.Executive Vice President -Finance and Administration andChief Financial Officer




---



##### Table of Contents



Exhibit Index
 Exhibit No.
    
    Exhibit Description99.1
    
    Letter to Forest Laboratories, Inc., dated July 6, 2011, from NYSE Regulation
[Cite as HomEq Servicing Corp. v. Schwamberger, 122 Ohio St.3d 80, 2009-Ohio-2607.]

H OM E Q S ERVICING C ORPORATION , A PPELLEE , v . S CHWAMBERGER ET AL ., A PPELLANTS . [Cite as HomEq Servicing Corp. v. Schwamberger, 122 Ohio St.3d 80, 2009-Ohio-2607.] Judgment of the court of appeals affirme d on the authority of Wilborn v. Bank One Corp. (No. 2008-1284 — Submitted February 18, 2009 — Decided June 9, 2009.)
A PPEAL from the Court of Appeals for Scioto County, No. 07CA3146, 2008-Ohio-2478.

__________________ {¶ 1} The judgment of the court of appeals is affirmed on the authority
of Wilborn v. Bank One Corp. , 121 Ohio St.3d 546, 2009-Ohio-306, 906 N.E.2d
396.
M OYER , C.J., and P FEIFER , L UNDBERG S TRATTON , O’C ONNOR , O’D ONNELL , L ANZINGER , and C UPP , JJ., concur.

__________________ Ulmer & Berne, L.L.P., and Reuel D. Ash, for appellee. Volkema Thomas, L.P.A., and Michael S. Miller and Daniel R. Volkema; and Bannon, Howland & Dever Co., L.P.A., a nd Robert R. Dever, for appellants.

______________________
[if !vml]>[endif]>

[if !vml]>[endif]>

You have reached the FederalDepository Library Program Electronic Collection (FDLP/EC) Archive. Thisarchive assures ongoing access to publications in the FDLP/EC. Access topublications in the archive is available through GPO's suite of cataloging andlocator services, including the Catalog of U.S. Government Publications(CGP).  Archived copies of publications are retrieved in the event thatpublications are no longer available from the original publishing agency site. 
**Title:****Seismic adequacy of Thermo-Lagpanels [electronic resource]**
 
October 27, 1995
Supplement, December 10, 1997
 
SuDoc Number:Y 3.N 88:56-2/95-49
Item Number:1051-H-08 (online)
CGP systemNumber:000804951
 
April 18, 2018
EXHIBIT 32.1

                            Certification Pursuant to
                             18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
                             as adopted Pursuant to
                 Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

In connection with the annual report of Feminique Corporation (the "COMPANY") on
Form 10-QSB for the period ended June 30, 2005 as filed with the SEC on the date
hereof (the  "REPORT"),  I hereby  certify,  in my capacity as an officer of the
Company,  for purposes of 18 U.S.C.  ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:

      (1)   The Report fully complies with the  requirements of Section 13(a) or
            15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      (2)   The  information  contained in the Report  fairly  presents,  in all
            material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
            of the Company.

                                                /s/ Max Khan
                                                --------------------------------
                                                By: Max Khan
                                                Chief Executive Officer,
                                                Chief Financial Officer
                                                DATE: August 15, 2005
Exhibit 23.1

CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

We consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration Statements (No. 333-152311) on
Form S-3, and (No. 333-144878 and No. 333-138704) on Form S-8 of Kodiak Oil & Gas Corp. of our report dated
March 11, 2010 relating to our audit of the consolidated financial statements and internal control over financial reporting appearing in this Annual Report on Form 10-K of
Kodiak Oil & Gas Corp. for the year ended December 31, 2009.

/s/HEIN& ASSOCIATES LLP

HEIN& Associates LLP

Denver,
Colorado
March 11, 2010

---



QuickLinks
[DO NOT PUBLISH]

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT

________________________

No. 16-12615

Non-Argument Calendar

________________________

D.C. Docket Nos. 6:15-cv-00643-PGB; 6:14-bkc-03297-ABB

In re: JAMES E. BAUMANN,

DEBORA K. BAUMANN,

Debtors.

__________________________________________________________________

JAMES E. BAUMANN, 

Plaintiff-Appellant,

DEBORA K. BAUMANN,

Plaintiff,

versus

PNC BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION,

Defendant-Appellee.

________________________

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Middle District of Florida

________________________

(September 1, 2017)

Case: 16-12615 Date Filed: 09/01/2017 Page: 1 of 2 
2

Before HULL, WILSON, and ANDERSON, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: 

James Baumann (“Baumann”), proceeding pro se, challenges the district 

court’s dismissal of his appeal from a bankruptcy court order for lack of standing.

PNC, NA (“PNC”) is the purported holder of a note on a residence owned by 

Baumann and his wife, Deborah. When PNC attempted to foreclose on the 

property, Baumann—but not his wife—filed for Chapter 13 bankruptcy. PNC 

moved to have the automatic stay lifted with regard to Baumann’s wife, as codebtor on their residence, in order to pursue an in personam suit against her. The 

bankruptcy court granted the motion. Baumann challenged that decision in the 

district court and his appeal was dismissed for lack of standing because he was not 

a “person aggrieved” by the bankruptcy court’s order. This appeal followed.

After the close of briefing in this appeal, Baumann voluntarily dismissed his 

Chapter 13 case in the bankruptcy court. Because the issues raised on appeal 

involve the terms of Baumann’s Chapter 13 plan, this appeal was thereby rendered 

moot. See Neidich v. Salas, 783 F.3d 1215, 1216 (11th Cir. 2015) (“[T]he 

dismissal of a Chapter 13 case moots an appeal arising from the debtor’s 

bankruptcy proceedings.”). Accordingly, this appeal is

DISMISSED.

Case: 16-12615 Date Filed: 09/01/2017 Page: 2 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY HIGH

 355

 299

 283

 278

 319

 278

 269

 1,298

 1,850

 1,018

 1,777

 1,092

 1,781

 2,404

 2,381

 1,687

 1,909

 1,214

 804

 482

 474

 593

 729

 1,289

 1,152

 2,504

 2,773

 2,439

 2,150

 1,698

 1,140

 274

 267

 267

 263

 263

 256

 251

 272

 268

 274

 276

 271

 284

 277

 275

 279

 288

 290

 281

 268

 277

 268

 264

 273

 267

 274

 297

 321

 286

 279

 278

 288

 278

 273

 270

 273

 268

 262

 434

 457

 404

 460

 408

 509

 588

 582

 597

 615

 518

 433

 366

 349

 343

 363

 439

 441

 586

 738

 731

 611

 586

 510

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

MAY 2010 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: June 16, 2010

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

PITTSBURG BOTTOM ON THE SACRAMENTO RIVER