alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

DAY HIGH

 246

 244

 239

 242

 244

 243

 240

 246

 259

 250

 269

 265

 266

 256

 266

 251

 289

 363

 268

 410

 383

 775

 2,079

 2,147

 2,571

 2,052

 3,090

 3,222

 1,326

 891

 218

 222

 225

 225

 231

 231

 233

 236

 238

 243

 245

 249

 246

 245

 243

 232

 240

 239

 238

 237

 237

 237

 250

 257

 269

 252

 302

 270

 266

 261

 230

 232

 232

 232

 236

 236

 237

 240

 243

 246

 254

 254

 253

 250

 250

 245

 255

 260

 248

 268

 266

 346

 502

 536

 592

 645

 792

 763

 530

 444

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

APRIL 2005 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: May 12, 2005

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

PITTSBURG BOTTOM ON THE SACRAMENTO RIVER
114TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 3931 

AN ACT 

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service 

located at 620 Central Avenue Suite 1A in Hot Springs 

National Park, Arkansas, as the ‘‘Chief Petty Officer 

Adam Brown United States Post Office’’. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 
2 

•HR 3931 EH

1 SECTION 1. CHIEF PETTY OFFICER ADAM BROWN UNITED 

2 STATES POST OFFICE. 

3 (a) DESIGNATION.—The facility of the United States 

4 Postal Service located at 620 Central Avenue Suite 1A 

5 in Hot Springs National Park, Arkansas, shall be known 

6 and designated as the ‘‘Chief Petty Officer Adam Brown 

7 United States Post Office’’. 

8 (b) REFERENCES.—Any reference in a law, map, reg9 ulation, document, paper, or other record of the United 

10 States to the facility referred to in subsection (a) shall 

11 be deemed to be a reference to the ‘‘Chief Petty Officer 

12 Adam Brown United States Post Office’’. 

Passed the House of Representatives May 23, 2016. 

Attest: 

Clerk. 

114TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 3931 

AN ACT 

To designate the facility of the United States PostStates Post Office’’. the ‘‘Chief Petty Officer Adam Brown United 1A in Hot Springs National Park, Arkansas, as al Service located at 620 Central Avenue Suite
#### Frank Mariani, as a Stockholder Suing in Behalf of Scandore Paper Box Co., Inc., et al., Respondents, v. Frank Scandore et al., Appellants, et al., Defendants.

Ho opinion. Present —-Martin, P. J., Townley, Untermyer, Dore and Cohn, JJ.
Exhibit 32.1

Certification by the Chief Executive Officer Pursuant to
18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, I, the undersigned Chief Executive Officer of Genzyme Corporation (the "Company"), hereby
certify that the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the quarter ended June 30, 2008 (the "Report") fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.

/s/HENRI A. TERMEERHenri A. Termeer Chief Executive OfficerAugust 8, 2008


---



QuickLinks
I 

114TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 4036 

To prohibit any regulation regarding carbon dioxide or other greenhouse 

gas emissions reduction in the United States until China, India, and 

Russia implement similar reductions. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

NOVEMBER 17, 2015 

Mr. FLEMING introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Energy and Commerce 

A BILL 

To prohibit any regulation regarding carbon dioxide or other 

greenhouse gas emissions reduction in the United States 

until China, India, and Russia implement similar reductions. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. DEFINITION OF ADMINISTRATOR. 

4 In this Act, the term ‘‘Administrator’’ means the Ad5 ministrator of the Environmental Protection Agency. 

6 SEC. 2. FINDINGS. 

7 Congress finds that— 


emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 4036 IH

1 (1) in 1997, the Senate adopted Senate Resolu2 tion 98, 105th Congress, agreed to July 25, 1997, 

3 which expressed the sense of the Senate that the 

4 United States should not accept any agreement that 

5 would mandate new commitments to limit or reduce 

6 greenhouse gas emissions by developed countries un7 less the agreement also mandated new specific 

8 scheduled commitments to limit or reduce green9 house gas emissions by developing countries within 

10 the same compliance period; and 

11 (2) the Administrator continues to move for12 ward with the regulation of carbon dioxide emis13 sions, however, the People’s Republic of China, 

14 India, and the Russian Federation do not impose 

15 similar regulations on carbon dioxide emissions. 

16 SEC. 3. CARBON DIOXIDE AND OTHER GREENHOUSE GAS 

17 EMISSIONS REDUCTIONS IN CHINA, INDIA, 

18 AND RUSSIA. 

19 Notwithstanding any other provision of law, the Ad20 ministrator or the head of any other Federal agency or 

21 department shall not regulate or continue to implement 

22 or enforce any regulations, proposals, or actions estab23 lishing any carbon dioxide or greenhouse gas emissions re24 ductions until the Administrator, the Administrator of the 


emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with BILLS
3 

•HR 4036 IH

1 Energy Information Agency, and the Secretary of Com2 merce certify in writing that— 

3 (1) the People’s Republic of China, India, and 

4 the Russian Federation have proposed, implemented, 

5 and enforced measures requiring carbon dioxide and 

6 other greenhouse gas emissions reductions; and 

7 (2) the reductions described in paragraph (1) 

8 are substantially similar to the carbon dioxide and 

9 other greenhouse gas emission reductions proposed 

10 by the Administrator or the head of any other Fed11 eral agency or department for the United States. 

12 SEC. 4. REPEAL. 

13 Any regulation, proposal, or action in effect before, 

14 on, or after the date of enactment of this Act, but before 

15 the date on which the certification under section 3 is 

16 made, that requires any carbon dioxide or other green17 house gas emissions reduction shall have no force or effect. 

Æ 


emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with BILLS
§ 404.1626 Fiscal. ( a ) We will give the State funds, in advance or by way of reimbursement, for necessary costs in making disability determinations under these regulations. Necessary costs are direct as well as indirect costs as defined in 41 CFR part 1-15, subpart 1-15.7 of the Federal Procurement Regulations System for costs incurred before April 1, 1984; and 48 CFR part 31, subpart 31.6 of the Federal Acquisition Regulations System and Federal Management Circular A-74-4[1] as amended or superseded for costs incurred after March 31, 1984.
( b ) The State will submit estimates of anticipated costs in the form of a budget at the time and in the manner we require.
( c ) We will notify the State of the amount which will be made available to it as well as what anticipated costs are being approved.
( d ) The State may not incur or make expenditures for items of cost not approved by us or in excess of the amount we make available to the State.
( e ) After the close of a period for which funds have been made available to the State, the State will submit a report of its expenditures. Based on an audit arranged by the State under Pub. L. 98-502, the Single Audit Act of 1984, or by the Inspector General of the Social Security Administration or based on an audit or review by the Social Security Administration (see § 404.1627), we will determine whether the expenditures were consistent with cost principles described in 41 CFR part 1-15, subpart 1-15.7 for costs incurred before April 1, 1984; and 48 CFR part 31, subpart 31.6 and Federal Management Circular A-741-4 for costs incurred after March 31, 1984: and in other applicable written guidelines in effect at the time the expenditures were made or incurred.
( f ) Any monies paid to the State which are used for purposes not within the scope of these regulations will be paid back to the Treasury of the United States.
[46 FR 29204, May 29, 1981, as amended at 56 FR 11019, Mar. 14, 1991; 62 FR 38452, July 18, 1997] Footnotes -
404.1626
[1] The circular is available from the Office of Administration, Publications Unit, Rm. G-236, New Executive Office Bldg., Washington, DC 20503.
**Ernst
                & Young LLP**
            
            Phone: (720)
                931-4000Suite
                3300
            
            Fax: 
                (720)
                931-4444370
                17th Street
            
            www.ey.comDenver,
                Colorado 80202-5663




**Report
      on Management's Assertion on**


Compliance
      With the Specified Minimum Servicing Standards Set Forth in the


*Uniform
      Single Attestation Program for Mortgage Bankers*




**Report
      of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm**




Member


Aurora
      Loan Services LLC




We
      have
      examined management's assertion, included in the accompanying report titled *Report* *of
      Management,* that
      Aurora Loan Services LLC (the Company) complied with the servicing standards
      identified in Exhibit A (the specified minimum servicing standards) to the *Report
      of* *Management* as
      set
      forth in the Mortgage Bankers Association of America's *Uniform
      Single Attestation Program for Mortgage Bankers* (USAP)
      during the year ended November 30, 2005. Management
      is responsible for the Company's compliance with these specified minimum servicing
      standards. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on management's assertion
      about the Company's compliance based on our examination.




Our
      examination was made in accordance with standards established by the American
      Institute of
      Certified Public Accountants and, accordingly, included examining, on a test
      basis, evidence about
      the
      Company's compliance with the specified minimum servicing standards and performing
      such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. We
      believe that
      our
      examination provides a reasonable basis for our opinion. Our examination does
      not provide
      a
      legal determination on the Company's compliance with the specified minimum servicing
      standards.




In our
      opinion, management's assertion that the Company complied with the
      aforementioned specified
      minimum servicing standards during the year ended November 30, 2005, is fairly stated,
      in all material respects.




**** /s/
      Ernst & Young LLP**




February
      17, 2006




A
      Member
      Practice of Ernst & Young Global
#### Albert M. Johnston, Respondent, v. Sarah Strasburger, as Executrix, etc., Appellant.

Order affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements. No opinion. Present — Ingraham, P. J., McLaughlin, Laughlin, Clarke and Scott, JJ.
Exhibit 23.1   CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM  We consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration Statement (No. 333-128293) on Form S-8 and in Registration Statement (No. 333-160305) on Form S-3 of Orchids Paper Products Company of our report dated March 11, 2011, relating to our audits of the financial statements and internal control over financial reporting, which appear in this Annual Report on Form 10-K of Orchids Paper Products Company for the year ended December 31, 2010.  /s/ HoganTaylor LLP  Tulsa, Oklahoma March 11, 2011  688 E. Millsap, Suite 203, Fayetteville, AR 72703-4095 P 479.521,9191  F 479.521.2817 www.hogantaylor.com
**Exhibit 23.1**

**Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm**

The Board of Directors 

Ruth’s Hospitality Group, Inc.: 

We consent to the incorporation by reference in theregistration statements on Form S-3 (No. 333-171485) and on Form S-8 (No. 333-127681) of Ruth’s Hospitality Group, Inc. of our reports dated March 4, 2011, with respect to the consolidated balance sheets of Ruth’s Hospitality Group,Inc. and subsidiaries as of December 27, 2009 and December 26, 2010, and the related consolidated statements of income (loss), stockholders’ equity (deficit) and cash flows for the fifty-two weeks ended December 28,2008, December 27, 2009 and December 26, 2010, and the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting as of December 26, 2010, which reports appear in the December 26, 2010 annual report on Form 10-K ofRuth’s Hospitality Group, Inc. 

/s/ KPMG LLP 

Orlando, Florida 

March 4, 2011 

Certified Public Accountants
#### Samson Burkholder v. McKinley-Lanning Loan & Trust Company et al.

Filed January 19, 1898.

No. 7751.

Review: Sufficiency of Evidence. In this case but one question is presented, and that is the sufficiency óf the evidence to sustain the judgment ot the district court. ■ An examination of all the evidence disclosing that this objection is not well taken, said judgment is affirmed.

Error from the district Court of Kearney county. Tried below before Beall, J.

*Affirmed.*

*John W. Tipton*and *Ed L. Adams,*for plaintiff in error.

*Tibbets Bros., Morey & Ferris, contra.*

Ryan, C.

The McKinley-Lanning Loan & Trust Company brought this action for the foreclosure of a mortgage executed to said plaintiff by Samson Burkholder and his wife to secure payment of ten promissory notes made. *489by Samson Burkholder to said company, each of which said notes was for the sum of $17.50. There was made defendant A. P. Tillinghast, by whom a cross-petition was filed asking the foreclosure of a mortgage likewise made by Samson Burkholder and his wife to said company to secure payment of a note for $1,400 executed by Mr. Burkholder to said company, by which company it had been transferred to Tillinghast. The notes secured by the two above described mortgages, as well as the mortgages themselves, bore date September 28, 1892. The notes for $17.50 fell due in succession at intervals of six months reckoning from their date. The $1,400 note was due in five years from its date and the interest thereon at six per cent per annum was evidenced by ten semi-annual coupon notes. In the petitions for foreclosure it was averred, and by the answer admitted, that the first semi-annual payments due the respective holders of the mortgages sought to be foreclosed had not been paid when foreclosure proceedings were instituted. In each of the mortgages there was a provision that a failure to make any semi-annual payment thereby secured, for a period of ten days after the same fell due, rendered the whole amount secured due and subject to collection. The contention of plaintiff in error was that the loan was really made at the fate of eight and one-half per cent per annum; that for two and one-half per cent per annum distinct coupons were made, and that, if the foreclosure was permitted for the amount of the ten notes of $17.50 each at the end of the first year of the term of the loan, the amount would include interest at a higher rate than ten per cent per annum, and that the loan under such circumstances was usurious. The claim of the holders of the mortgage was that the notes for $17.50 each simply represented the commission which Mr. Burk-holder had agreed to pay for obtaining the loan at the rate of six per cent per annum, and that these notes were not for any portion of interest. On conflicting evidence the district court adopted the contention of plaintiff, and *490this conclusion having support in the evidence cannot be disturbed. The petition in error presents no other question and the judgment of the district court is

Affirmed.
Court of Appeals

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

MANDATE

TO THE 296TH JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT OF COLLIN COUNTY, GREETINGS:

Before the Court of Appeals for the Fifth District of Texas, on the 17th day of November, 2104, 

the cause on appeal to revise or reverse the judgment between

ALONZO GRAYSON, JR., Appellant

No. 05-13-00832-CR V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the 296th Judicial District 

Court, Collin County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 296-81500-2012.

Opinion delivered by Justice Lang, Justices 

Bridges and Evans participating.

was determined; and this Court made its order in these words:

Based on the Court’s opinion of this date, the judgment of the trial court is AFFIRMED.

WHEREFORE, WE COMMAND YOU to observe the order of the Court of Appeals 

for the Fifth District of Texas, in this behalf, and have it duly obeyed and executed.

WITNESS the HON. CAROLYN WRIGHT, Chief Justice of the Court of Appeals, with 

the Seal thereof affixed, at the City of Dallas, this 11th day of May, 2015.

LISA MATZ, Clerk
_________________________________________ 

 

 

Order Michigan Supreme Court 

Lansing, Michigan 

April 26, 2006 Clifford W. Taylor,

 Chief Justice 

129623 Michael F. Cavanagh 

Elizabeth A. Weaver 

Marilyn Kelly 

Maura D. Corrigan 

TRACEY PICKETT-HOLMES,

Plaintiff-Appellant, 

Robert P. Young, Jr. 

Stephen J. Markman,

 Justices 

v SC: 129623 

 COA: 253058 

Monroe CC: 03-016360-CK 

FARM BUREAU MUTUAL 

INSURANCE COMPANY OF 

MICHIGAN, 

Defendant-Appellee. 

_________________________________________/ 

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the August 23, 2005 

judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not 

persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court. 

CAVANAGH and KELLY, JJ., would grant leave to appeal. 

l0419 

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

April 26, 2006 

Clerk
<PAGE>


                                   EXHIBIT 11


                 STATEMENT RE: COMPUTATION OF PER SHARE EARNINGS

Earnings per share ("EPS") is calculated on a Basic EPS and Diluted EPS basis.
Basic EPS excludes dilution and is computed by dividing income available to
common shareholders (the numerator) by the weighted-average number of common
shares outstanding (the denominator) during the period. Income available to
common shareholders is Net Income in the table below and as reported in
Bancorp's income statement. No adjustments were required to net income for any
EPS calculations.

Diluted EPS is calculated by adjusting the denominator for all dilutive
potential common shares that were outstanding during the period. Bancorp had
stock options outstanding during the periods presented below which had a
dilutive effect on EPS. Therefore, the number of additional common shares that
would have been outstanding if the options had been exercised is added to the
denominator to arrive at the dilutive number of shares.

The calculations of earnings per share below are based on the weighted average
number of shares outstanding, adjusted for the 5% stock dividend paid July 28,
1999, including all common stock and common stock equivalents in conformity with
the instructions for Item 601 of Regulation S-K.

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>

(DOLLARS IN THOUSANDS)                          Six  Month Period Ended         Quarter Ended June 30,
                                           1999              1998              1999              1998
                                     ------------------ ---------------- ----------------- --------------------
<S>                             <C>                   <C>               <C>               <C>
Net income                                     $ 7,970          $ 7,975           $ 3,790            $ 3,786
                                         -------------      -----------      ------------      -------------
                                         -------------      -----------      ------------      -------------

Basic EPS:
     Shares                                  9,179,310        9,090,021         9,198,689          9,095,718
     EPS                                         $ .87            $ .88            $ 0.41             $ 0.42

Dilutive shares:
     Stock options                              60,179          114,419            55,521            118,215
     EPS                                        $ 0.01           $ 0.01              $ --             $ 0.01

Diluted EPS:
     Shares including options                9,239,489        9,204,440         9,254,210          9,213,933
     EPS                                         $ .86            $ .87            $ 0.41             $ 0.41


</TABLE>

                                       50
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Defense

###### Department of the Navy

# AGENCY:

Department of the Navy, DoD.

# ACTION:

Notice of open meeting.

# SUMMARY:

The Ocean Research and Resources Advisory Panel (ORRAP) will hold a meeting. The meeting will be open to the public.

# DATES:

The meeting will be held on Monday, May 2, 2011, from 3 p.m. to 5 p.m. Members of the public should submit their comments in advance of the meeting to the meeting Point of Contact.

# ADDRESSES:

The meeting will be held at the Consortium for Ocean Leadership, 1201 New York Avenue, NW., 4th Floor, Washington DC 20005.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Dr. Charles L. Vincent, Office of Naval Research, 875 North Randolph Street Suite 1425, Arlington, VA 22203-1995, telephone 703-696-4118.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    This notice of open meeting is provided in accordance with the Federal Advisory Committee Act (5 U.S.C. App. 2). The meeting will include discussions on ocean research, resource management, and other current issues in the ocean science and management communities; including, the review and development of Strategic Action Plans for the National Ocean Council. There is a possibility that this meeting may be cancelled. If so, this would be posted on the ORRAP Web site at                     *http://www.nopp.org/​committees/​orrap/​.*

      ( print page 22084)    
Dated: April 14, 2011.

D.J. Werner,

Lieutenant Commander, Judge Advocate General's Corps, U.S. Navy, Federal Register Liaison Officer.

[FR Doc. 2011-9548 Filed 4-19-11; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 3810-FF-P