alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
### §878. Powers of enforcement personnel

(a) Any officer or employee of the Drug Enforcement Administration or any State, tribal, or local law enforcement officer designated by the Attorney General may—

(1) carry firearms;

(2) execute and serve search warrants, arrest warrants, administrative inspection warrants, subpenas, and summonses issued under the authority of the United States;

(3) make arrests without warrant (A) for any offense against the United States committed in his presence, or (B) for any felony, cognizable under the laws of the United States, if he has probable cause to believe that the person to be arrested has committed or is committing a felony;

(4) make seizures of property pursuant to the provisions of this subchapter; and

(5) perform such other law enforcement duties as the Attorney General may designate.

(b) State and local law enforcement officers performing functions under this section shall not be deemed Federal employees and shall not be subject to provisions of law relating to Federal employees, except that such officers shall be subject to section 3374(c) of title 5.

(Pub. L. 91–513, title II, §508, Oct. 27, 1970, 84 Stat. 1273; Pub. L. 96–132, §16(b), Nov. 30, 1979, 93 Stat. 1049; Pub. L. 99–570, title I, §1869, Oct. 27, 1986, 100 Stat. 3207–55; Pub. L. 99–646, §86, Nov. 10, 1986, 100 Stat. 3620; Pub. L. 111–211, title II, §232(d), July 29, 2010, 124 Stat. 2278.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

2010—Subsec. (a). Pub. L. 111–211 inserted ", tribal," after "State" in introductory provisions.

1986—Pub. L. 99–570 and Pub. L. 99–646 amended section substantially identically designating existing provisions as subsec. (a) and adding subsec. (b), with the exception of the amendment of subsec. (a) for which Pub. L. 99–570 directed the insertion of "or (with respect to offenses under this subchapter or subchapter II of this chapter) any State or local law enforcement officer" and Pub. L. 99–646 directed the insertion of "or any State or local law enforcement officer", the latter of which was executed to reflect the probable intent of Congress.

1979—Pub. L. 96–132 substituted "Drug Enforcement Administration" for "Bureau of Narcotics and Dangerous Drugs".
### Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.,
Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanag h Marilyn Kell y Stephen J. Markma n Diane M. Hathawa y Mary Beth Kell y Brian K. Zahra,

J ustices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

_______________________________________ __ Clerk November 21, 2011

p1114 

# Order

November 21, 2011

143538

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Plaintiff-Appellee,

v SC: 143538 COA: 297371 Muskegon CC: 09-058294-FH JACK DARNELL HENDRICKS, Defendant-Appellant.

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the June 21, 2011 judgment of the Court of Appeals is consid ered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the questions presented s hould be reviewed by this Court.
```

[Congressional Bills 116th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 5713 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

116th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 5713

 To direct the Secretary of Defense to establish an authority to issue 
   permits to certain members of the Armed Forces who seek to carry 
          concealed firearms while on military installations.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            January 29, 2020

   Mr. Steube (for himself, Mr. Yoho, and Mr. Spano) introduced the 
 following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Armed Services

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To direct the Secretary of Defense to establish an authority to issue 
   permits to certain members of the Armed Forces who seek to carry 
          concealed firearms while on military installations.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Safe Bases Act''.

SEC. 2. PERMITS TO CARRY CONCEALED FIREARMS ON MILITARY INSTALLATIONS.

    (a) In General.--Not later than one year after the date of the 
enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense shall establish a 
single element of the Department of Defense to issue, upon request by a 
covered member, a permit that authorizes that covered member to carry a 
concealed firearm while on any military installation.
    (b) Covered Member Defined.--In this section, the term ``covered 
member'' means a member of the Armed Forces who--
            (1) is not prohibited from purchasing, owning, or 
        possessing a firearm under section 922 of title 18, United 
        States Code; and
            (2) is on active duty.
                                 <all>
```
**CERTIFICATION 31.2**
I, Elaine K. Roberts, certify that:
 1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K/A of Oppenheimer Holdings Inc.;  2. Based on my knowledge, this annual report does not contain any untrue statement of a materialfact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of thecircumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this annual report;  3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in thisannual report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results ofoperations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this annualreport;  4. The registrant’s other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing and maintainingdisclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e)) and 15d-15(e)) forthe registrant and we have:
 a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosurecontrols and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure thatmaterial information relating to the registrant, including its consolidatedsubsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularlyduring the period in which this annual report is being prepared;  b) designed such internal control over financial reporting, or causedsuch internal control over financial reporting to be designed underour supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding thereliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financialstatements for external purposes in accordance with generallyaccepted accounting principles;  c) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls andprocedures; and presented in this annual report our conclusions about theeffectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures as of the end of theperiod covered by the annual report based on such evaluation;  d) disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal controlover financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recentfiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely tomaterially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting;and
 5. The registrant’s other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and theaudit committee of registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalentfunction):
 a) all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal controlover financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect theregistrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial data;and  b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or otheremployees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting.
 Name: Elaine K. Roberts
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,  AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of ALCO, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-QSB/A for the period ended June 30, 2006 (the "Report"), I, Andrew Liu, President and Chairman of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

> 1) The Report fully complies with the requirement of Section 13(a) or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange
> Act of 1934; and
> 
> 
> 2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the Company's
> financial position and results of operations.

/s/Andrew Liu



Andrew Liu, President and Chairman

September 14, 2006
#### § 404.1012 Work excluded from employment.

Certain kinds of work performed by an employee are excluded from employment. They are described in §§ 404.1014 through 404.1038 and are exceptions to the general rule in § 404.1004 on the kinds of work that are covered as employment. In general, if the work performed by an employee is excluded from employment, the work is not covered under social security. However, certain kinds of work performed by an employee, even though excluded from employment, are covered as self-employment for social security purposes. In addition, if part of the work performed by an employee for the same employer is included as employment and part is excluded from employment, all the work may be included or all may be excluded as described in § 404.1013.

[45 FR 20075, Mar. 27, 1980, as amended at 61 FR 38365, July 24, 1996]
EXHIBIT 31.1
 CCFNB BANCORP, INC.
 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
RULE 13a  14(a) UNDER THE SECURITIES  EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934, AS AMENDED
  1.
    
    I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of CCFNB Bancorp, Inc.;2.
    
    Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a
material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in
light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with
respect to the quarterly period covered by this report;3.
    
    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information
included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition,
results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods
presented in this report;4.
    
    The registrants other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing and
maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e)
and 15d  15 (e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange
Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and have:
     5.
    
    The registrants other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most
recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants
auditors and the audit committee of the registrants board of directors (or persons
performing the equivalent functions):
 (a)
    
    All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of
internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect
the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information;
and(b)
    
    Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who
have a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial reporting.
  /s/ Lance O. DiehlLance O. DiehlPresident and Chief Executive Officer(Principal Executive Officer) 36
#### Carl Lee CALLEGARI, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. J. LACY and C. Sharpes, Defendants— Appellees, and Steve Cambra; et al., Defendants.

No. 05-15674.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted Feb. 13, 2006.*

Filed Feb. 17, 2006.

Carl Lee Callegari, Soledad, CA, pro se.

Constance Picciano, Esq., Allen Robert Crown, Esq., Office of the California Attorney General, Sacramento, CA, for Defendants — -Appellees and Defendants.

Before: FERNANDEZ, RYMER, and BYBEE, Circuit Judges.

*

 The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. *See*Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

MEMORANDUM **

California state prisoner Carl Lee Callegari appeals pro se from the district court’s summary judgment in favor of correctional officers J. Lacy and C. Sharpes *165in his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action alleging that the defendants filed false disciplinary reports against him in retaliation for his filing a lawsuit against the prison. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review de novo a district court’s grant of summary judgment, *Barnett v. Centoni,*31 F.3d 813, 815 (9th Cir.1994) (per curiam), and we affirm.

The district court properly granted summary judgment on Callegari’s retaliation claims because Callegari offered only his unsupported hypothesis that defendants acted out of an improper motive. *See Nelson v. Pima Community College,*83 F.3d 1075, 1081-82 (9th Cir.1996) (“[M]ere allegation and speculation do not create a factual dispute for purposes of summary judgment.”).

The defendants’ failure to comply with the local rule requiring that a separate statement of undisputed facts accompany a motion for summary judgment is insufficient to warrant reversal in the absence of any showing of prejudice. *See Lewis v. Holzman (In re Telemart Enters., Inc.),*524 F.2d 761, 766 (9th Cir.1975).

AFFIRMED.

**

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
### §2225. Decontamination and disposal standards and plans

#### (a) In general

The Administrator of the Environmental Protection Agency (referred to in this section as the "Administrator"), in coordination with the Secretary of Health and Human Services, Secretary of Homeland Security, and Secretary of Agriculture, shall provide support for, and technical assistance to, State, local, and tribal governments in preparing for, assessing, decontaminating, and recovering from an agriculture or food emergency.

#### (b) Development of standards

In carrying out subsection (a), the Administrator, in coordination with the Secretary of Health and Human Services, Secretary of Homeland Security, Secretary of Agriculture, and State, local, and tribal governments, shall develop and disseminate specific standards and protocols to undertake clean-up, clearance, and recovery activities following the decontamination and disposal of specific threat agents and foreign animal diseases.

#### (c) Development of model plans

In carrying out subsection (a), the Administrator, the Secretary of Health and Human Services, and the Secretary of Agriculture shall jointly develop and disseminate model plans for—

(1) the decontamination of individuals, equipment, and facilities following an intentional contamination of agriculture or food; and

(2) the disposal of large quantities of animals, plants, or food products that have been infected or contaminated by specific threat agents and foreign animal diseases.

#### (d) Exercises

In carrying out subsection (a), the Administrator, in coordination with the entities described under subsection (b), shall conduct exercises at least annually to evaluate and identify weaknesses in the decontamination and disposal model plans described in subsection (c). Such exercises shall be carried out, to the maximum extent practicable, as part of the national exercise program under section 748(b)(1) of title 6.

#### (e) Modifications

Based on the exercises described in subsection (d), the Administrator, in coordination with the entities described in subsection (b), shall review and modify as necessary the plans described in subsection (c) not less frequently than biennially.

#### (f) Prioritization

The Administrator, in coordination with the entities described in subsection (b), shall develop standards and plans under subsections (b) and (c) in an identified order of priority that takes into account—

(1) highest-risk biological, chemical, and radiological threat agents;

(2) agents that could cause the greatest economic devastation to the agriculture and food system; and

(3) agents that are most difficult to clean or remediate.

(Pub. L. 111–353, title II, §208, Jan. 4, 2011, 124 Stat. 3944.)
---

Exhibit 99.5 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 
18 U.S.C. §1350, 
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 In connection with the annual report of Silver Wheaton Corp. (the Company) on Form 40-F for the period ended December 31, 2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Peter Barnes, Chief Executive Officer and Director of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that: (1)
     The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and(2)
     The information contained in this Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
   March 31, 2010
     By:/s/ Peter BarnesPeter BarnesChief Executive Officer


---
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY HIGH

 3,937

 3,842

 4,459

 3,892

 3,981

 3,635

 3,079

 2,692

 2,597

 2,719

 2,937

 2,999

 3,260

 3,867

 3,889

 4,337

 4,613

 4,110

 2,369

 3,140

 3,089

 3,207

 3,030

 3,343

 3,654

 3,794

 3,967

 4,085

 4,129

 3,610

 3,704

 1,217

 1,152

 1,258

 1,347

 1,244

 1,138

 1,050

 1,125

 1,149

 1,222

 1,248

 1,216

 1,193

 1,185

 1,246

 1,315

 1,274

 1,063

 964

 837

 955

 989

 1,131

 1,116

 1,127

 1,149

 1,107

 1,151

 1,076

 924

 1,021

 2,248

 2,029

 2,248

 2,323

 2,187

 1,948

 1,781

 1,655

 1,681

 1,766

 1,746

 1,740

 1,823

 2,060

 2,186

 2,382

 2,523

 2,295

 1,701

 1,727

 1,708

 1,822

 1,825

 1,885

 1,917

 1,889

 1,909

 2,016

 1,906

 1,814

 1,893

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

OCTOBER 2015 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: November 2, 2015

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

14 DAY

ACCUM

MEAN

14 DAY

AVG

MEAN

 34,889

 34,552

 34,400

 34,269

 33,805

 32,813

 31,842

 31,015

 30,369

 29,760

 28,914

 28,154

 27,459

 27,235

 27,173

 27,526

 27,801

 27,773

 27,287

 27,066

 26,993

 27,160

 27,304

 27,423

 27,594

 27,743

 27,829

 27,785

 27,505

 26,937

 26,307

 2,492

 2,468

 2,457

 2,448

 2,415

 2,344

 2,274

 2,215

 2,169

 2,126

 2,065

 2,011

 1,961

 1,945

 1,941

 1,966

 1,986

 1,984

 1,949

 1,933

 1,928

 1,940

 1,950

 1,959

 1,971

 1,982

 1,988

 1,985

 1,965

 1,924

 1,879

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

JERSEY POINT TOP ON THE SAN JOAQUIN RIVER
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY HIGH

 271

 265

 263

 250

 247

 249

 251

 253

 262

 254

 264

 277

 255

 255

 300

 304

 302

 304

 284

 262

 263

 258

 259

 284

 294

 272

 314

 280

 261

 252

 246

 188

 189

 185

 201

 206

 203

 204

 211

 213

 194

 200

 203

 202

 200

 208

 214

 207

 193

 181

 151

 182

 176

 181

 185

 197

 203

 195

 209

 209

 199

 201

 219

 218

 216

 219

 222

 223

 224

 230

 229

 221

 222

 224

 217

 219

 227

 248

 255

 248

 220

 215

 218

 215

 219

 226

 236

 230

 233

 234

 229

 223

 216

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

MARCH 2003 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: April 15, 2003

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

RIO VISTA ON THE SACRAMENTO RIVER
EXHIBIT
23.1








CONSENT
OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM





We
consent to the incorporation by reference in (i) Registration Statement
No. 333-129668 of Enterprise GP Holdings L.P. on Form S-8, and (ii)
Registration Statement Nos. 333-146236 and 333-161597 of Enterprise GP
Holdings L.P. on Form S-3 of our reports dated March 1, 2010, relating to the
consolidated financial statements of Enterprise GP Holdings L.P. and
subsidiaries (which report expresses an unqualified opinion and includes an
explanatory paragraph concerning the retroactive effects of the common control
acquisition of TEPPCO Partners, L.P. and Texas Eastern Products Pipeline
Company, LLC by Enterprise Products Partners L.P. on October 26, 2009 and
the related change in business segments described in Notes 1 and 11), and the
effectiveness of Enterprise GP Holdings L.P. and subsidiaries’ internal control
over financial reporting, appearing in this Annual Report on Form 10-K of
Enterprise GP Holdings L.P. for the year ended December 31, 2009.





/s/
DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP





Houston,
Texas


March 1,
2010
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY ELEV

 122.71

 122.12

 122.56

 122.73

 122.53

 122.90

 122.56

 122.24

 122.62

 122.75

 122.82

 122.30

 121.84

 122.65

 123.86

 123.31

 123.42

 123.06

 122.33

 122.59

 122.63

 123.48

 122.95

 123.92

 123.31

 123.59

 122.96

 123.58

 123.62

 123.36

 122.82

 7,661

 7,395

 7,593

 7,670

 7,580

 7,746

 7,593

 7,449

 7,620

 7,679

 7,710

 7,476

 7,274

 7,634

 8,195

 7,937

 7,988

 7,819

 7,490

 7,607

 7,625

 8,017

 7,769

 8,223

 7,937

 8,068

 7,773

 8,064

 8,082

 7,960

 7,710

STORAGE

+293

-266

+198

+77

-90

+166

-153

-144

+171

+59

+31

-234

-202

+360

+561

-258

+51

-169

-329

+117

+18

+392

-248

+454

-286

+131

-295

+291

+18

-122

-250

CHANGE

3,759

7,953

7,718

6,687

6,006

6,124

5,975

5,947

6,119

6,170

6,146

7,327

7,948

10,014

17,439

22,107

25,499

25,252

24,994

24,386

24,529

22,674

20,646

21,002

20,666

20,871

20,645

18,851

15,773

12,734

10,653

INFLOW

 3,020

 5,012

 5,033

 5,024

 5,024

 5,026

 5,025

 5,028

 5,030

 5,124

 5,107

 5,041

 5,004

 1,835

 406

 392

 408

 1,984

 5,388

 5,096

 4,912

 4,948

 4,953

 4,952

 4,947

 4,956

 4,946

 4,981

 5,029

 5,027

 5,032

POWER

 494

 2,984

 2,495

 1,533

 936

 924

 937

 901

 912

 925

 930

 2,303

 2,945

 7,898

 16,650

 21,750

 24,974

 23,262

 19,691

 19,170

 19,548

 17,461

 15,733

 15,736

 15,790

 15,788

 15,787

 13,647

 10,646

 7,676

 5,652

SPILL

 60

 60

 60

 60

 60

 60

 60

 60

 60

 60

 60

 60

 60

 60

 60

 60

 60

 60

 60

 60

 60

 60

 60

 60

 60

 60

 60

 60

 60

 60

 60

HATCHERY

 1

 1

 0

 1

 1

 0

 0

 1

 1

 1

 0

 1

 1

 0

 0

 0

 1

 1

 1

 1

 0

 0

 0

 0

 1

 1

 1

 1

 2

 2

 2

C.F.S.

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

MARCH 2011 LAKE NATOMA DAILY OPERATIONS RUN DATE: April 1, 2011

IN LAKE

EVAP

C.F.S.

COMPUTED*

ACRE-FEET

RELEASE - C.F.S.

TOTALS +342 442,614 133,690 306,078 1,860 23

ACRE-FEET +342 877,925 265,174 607,106 3,689 46

COMMENTS:

* COMPUTED INFLOW IS THE SUM OF CHANGE IN STORAGE, RELEASES AND EVAPORATION.

SUMMARY

RELEASES (ACRE-FEET)

POWER 265,174

SPILL 607,106

FOLSOM SOUTH CANAL

HATCHERY

 1,565

 3,689

 7,368

FOLSOM

SOUTH 

CANAL

 36

 30

 30

 30

 30

 30

 30

 30

 30

 30

 33

 40

 40

 40

 40

 35

 30

 30

 20

 0

 0

 7

 25

 25

 12

 0

 0

 15

 27

 31

 33

 789

 1,565

(1)

(1) INCHES OF EVAPORATION TAKEN FROM FOLSOM PAN.

RELEASES (ACRE-FEET)

TOTAL 877,534