alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY HIGH

 13,833

 14,884

 16,486

 16,678

 16,041

 16,754

 18,303

 18,295

 17,286

 17,323

 15,083

 15,333

 15,395

 16,601

 11,512

 11,167

 10,610

 10,582

 10,648

 10,941

 9,945

 10,341

 12,160

 11,609

 11,100

 11,064

 10,472

 8,377

 9,930

 11,171

 11,473

 6,258

 6,928

 8,412

 8,868

 7,274

 6,423

 6,381

 7,251

 6,618

 6,842

 6,287

 6,435

 5,779

 6,873

 4,469

 4,702

 4,366

 4,109

 4,373

 3,815

 3,618

 3,370

 3,496

 3,603

 3,720

 3,871

 4,369

 3,184

 3,996

 4,262

 4,899

 10,223

 11,147

 12,008

 12,286

 11,445

 11,321

 11,855

 12,118

 11,424

 11,473

 11,086

 10,332

 11,215

 11,030

 8,420

 7,656

 7,155

 6,845

 6,758

 6,578

 6,447

 5,840

 7,240

 7,751

 7,850

 8,026

 7,064

 5,769

 6,781

 7,392

 7,695

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

OCTOBER 2009 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: November 3, 2009

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

PITTSBURG BOTTOM ON THE SACRAMENTO RIVER
§ 404.1815 Withholding certification or payments. ( a ) *When certification may be withheld.* After a determination or decision, we may withhold certification to the Managing Trustee, or, if we have already made certification, we may notify the Managing Trustee to withhold payments. We may do this if a question about the validity of the payment or payments to be made under the determination or decision arises as the result of one of the following events: ( 1 ) A reconsideration (whether at the request of a claimant or on our own motion), hearing, or review is being conducted, or a civil action has been filed in a Federal district court concerning the determination or decision.
( 2 ) An application or request is pending concerning the payment of benefits or a lump sum to another person, and the application or request is inconsistent, in whole or in part, with the payment or payments under the determination or decision.
( b ) *When certification will not be withheld.* We will not withhold certification or payment as explained in paragraph (a) of this section unless evidence is submitted with the request or application that is sufficient to raise a reasonable question about the validity of the payment or payments under the determination or decision. We will not withhold certification of any amount of the payment or payments not in question. Your acceptance of any payment or payments will not affect your right to reconsideration, hearing, or review about any additional payment or payments you may claim.
### §10502. Publication and provision of lists regarding progress on anti-corruption efforts

#### (a) Public list

The Secretary of State shall publish annually, on a publicly accessible website, a list of foreign countries where the government is sustaining or making good progress on anti-corruption efforts in accordance with the minimum standards set forth in section 10503 of this title. Such list shall include a brief description of each such country's progress or justification for being on such list.

#### (b) Classified list

The Secretary of State shall provide to the appropriate congressional committees a classified list of countries where the government is making limited or no efforts to comply with minimum standards set forth in section 10503 of this title, and are not achieving meaningful progress on combating corruption. Such list shall include a brief description of each country's lack of progress or justification for being on such list.

#### (c) Annual update

The Secretary of State shall provide an annual update in a classified setting to the appropriate congressional committees on the United States Government's efforts to fight against corruption. This update should include an overview of the key obstacles to combating corruption and present near-term and long-term strategies.

#### (d) Implementation and timing

#### (1) Deadline

The publication and submission of the lists and the annual update required by subsections (a), (b), and (c) shall be completed not later than 2 years after December 22, 2023, and annually thereafter for seven years.

#### (2) Report on methodology

Not later than one year after December 22, 2023, the Secretary shall submit to the appropriate congressional committees a report detailing the methodology developed to assign countries to either the public list or the classified list and a proposed budget for preparing the first set of lists during the subsequent year.

#### (e) Exception to publication

The Secretary may, in specific instances where the Secretary determines the inclusion of specific countries on the public list required by subsection (a) would not be in the national interests of the United States, submit the information required by subsection (a) about such specific countries in a classified manner in writing to the appropriate congressional committees, together with a justification for why publication would not be in the national interest. The justification, if applicable, shall be submitted the same date as the public list required by subsection (a).

(Pub. L. 118–31, div. E, title LIV, §5403, Dec. 22, 2023, 137 Stat. 944.)
#### In the Matter of the Application of Charles J. Holle and Others for Judicial Review of the Primary Election of the Democratic Party in the Fifteenth Ward of the City of Albany. In the Matter of the Application to Punish John Tammany and Others for an Alleged Contempt of Court Arising in the Above-entitled Proceeding.

Motion granted.
§ 404.304 What are the general rules on benefit amounts? This subpart describes how we determine the highest monthly benefit amount you ordinarily could qualify for under each type of benefit. However, the highest monthly benefit amount you could qualify for may not be the amount you will be paid. In a particular month, your benefit amount may be reduced or not paid at all. Under some circumstances, your benefit amount may be increased. The most common reasons for a change in your benefit amount are listed below. ( a ) *Age.* Sections 404.410 through 404.413 explain how your old-age, wife's or husband's, or widow's or widower's benefits may be reduced if you choose to receive them before you attain full retirement age (as defined in § 404.409).
( b ) *Earnings.* Sections 404.415 through 404.418 explain how deductions will be made from your benefits if your earnings or the insured person's earnings go over certain limits.
( c ) *Overpayments and underpayments.* Your benefits may be increased or decreased to make up for any previous overpayment or underpayment made on the insured person's record. For more information about this, see subpart F of this part.
( d ) *Family maximum.* Sections 404.403 through 404.406 explain that there is a maximum amount payable on each insured person's earnings record. If you are entitled to benefits as the insured's dependent or survivor, your benefits may be reduced to keep total benefits payable to the insured's family within these limits.
( e ) *Government pension offset.* If you are entitled to wife's, husband's, widow's, widower's, mother's, or father's benefits and receive a Government pension for work that was not covered under Social Security, your monthly benefits may be reduced because of that pension. For more information about this, see § 404.408a, which covers reductions for Government pensions.
( f ) *Rounding.* After all other deductions or reductions, we reduce any monthly benefit that is not a multiple of $1 to the next lower multiple of $1.
[68 FR 4702, Jan. 30, 2003, as amended at 83 FR 21708, May 10, 2018]
(No. 73-CC-197

#### Charles McCorkle, Jr., (Court Reporters), Claimant, *vs.*State of Illinois, Department of Public Aid, Respondent.

*Opinion filed May 3, 1973.*

Charles McCorkle, Jr., Claimant, pro se.

William J. Scott, Attorney General; Saul R. Wexler, Assistant Attorney General, for Respondent.

Per Curiam.
Comment Info: =================

General Comment:AD Docket Supporting Information
**EXHIBIT 99.21** 

 

**CONSENT OF DAVID GAUNT**

 

United States Securities and Exchange Commission

Gentlemen:

In connection with Silver Wheaton Corporation’s (the “Company”) Annual Report on Form 40-F for the year ended December 31, 2008 (the “Annual Report”), I, David Gaunt, P.Geo., hereby consent to the inclusion in, or incorporation by reference into, and the use of my name in connection with the preparation of the following documents/reports:

 

| 1.     | Resource estimate of the Campo Morado Project;                                                                                                                          |
|--------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   |                                                                                                                                                                    |
| 2.     | Technical report dated March 17, 2008, entitled “Technical Report and Mineral Resource Estimate on the G-9 Deposit, Campo Morado Project, Guerrero State, Mexico; |
|   |                                                                                                                                                                    |
| 3.     | The Annual Report.                                                                                                                                                      |

 

Date: March 30, 2009

|   | Yours truly,/s/ David Gaunt |
|--------|-----------------------------|
|   | Name: David Gaunt, P.Geo.   |
# C_2012026EN.01000201.xml

| 31.1.2012 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 26/2 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

31.1.2012

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 26/2

---

Notice for the attention of the persons to which measures provided for in Council Decision 2011/72/CFSP, as amended by Council Decision 2012/50/CFSP, concerning restrictive measures directed against certain persons and entities in view of the situation in Tunisia apply

2012/C 26/02

COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION,

The following information is brought to the attention of the persons that appear in Annex I to Council Decision 2011/72/CFSP, as amended by Council Decision 2012/50/CFSP (1), concerning restrictive measures directed against certain persons and entities in view of the situation in Tunisia.

1

The Council of the European Union has decided that the persons that appear in the abovementioned Annex should be included in the list of persons subject to restrictive measures provided for in Council Decision 2011/72/CFSP concerning restrictive measures directed against certain persons and entities in view of the situation in Tunisia.

The persons concerned may submit a request to the Council, together with supporting documentation, that the decision to include them on the abovementioned list should be reconsidered, to the following address:

| Council of the European Union |
| --- |
| General Secretariat |
| DG K Coordination |
| Rue de la Loi/Wetstraat 175 |
| 1048 Bruxelles/Brussel |
| BELGIQUE/BELGIË |

Council of the European Union

General Secretariat

DG K Coordination

Rue de la Loi/Wetstraat 175

1048 Bruxelles/Brussel

BELGIQUE/BELGIË

The attention of the persons concerned is also drawn to the possibility of challenging the Council's decision before the General Court of the European Union, in accordance with the conditions laid down in Article 275, second paragraph, and Article 263, fourth and sixth paragraphs, of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union.

---

(1)  OJ L 27, 31.1.2012.

1

---
###### Editorial Note on Part 555

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 555 appear by T.D. ATF-487, 68 FR 3748, Jan. 24, 2003.

#### § 555.129 Exportation.

Exportation of explosive materials is to be in accordance with the applicable provisions of section 38 of the Arms Export Control Act (22 U.S.C. 2778) and implementing regulations. However, a licensed importer, licensed manufacturer, or licensed dealer exporting explosive materials shall maintain records showing the manufacture or acquisition of explosive materials as required by this part and records showing the quantity, the manufacturer's name or brand name of explosive materials, the name and address of the foreign consignee of the explosive materials, and the date the explosive materials were exported. See § 555.180 for regulations concerning the exportation of plastic explosives.

[T.D. ATF-87, 46 FR 40384, Aug. 7, 1981, as amended by T.D. ATF-387, 62 FR 8377, Feb. 25, 1997]
§ 321.1 Filing applications electronically. ( a ) *Electronic filing.* An application for benefits under the Railroad Unemployment Insurance Act may be filed electronically through the Board's Internet Web site, *http://www.rrb.gov ,* utilizing a User ID and a PIN/Password.
( b ) *Adjudication of applications filed electronically.* An application filed electronically shall be adjudicated in accordance with the procedures set forth in this part.
( c ) *Date of filing.* The date of filing for an application filed electronically shall be the date that the electronic filing of the application is accepted by the Board's electronic system. If an attempt to file an application through the Board's electronic system is unsuccessful and is rejected by that system, the claimant must submit another application. If the subsequent application, filed either electronically or on paper, is received by the Board within 30 days from the date of the notification that the initial filing attempt was rejected, the Board will establish the filing date of the subsequent application as the date the rejected application was attempted to be filed.
Searched for **http://www.fmc.gov/**

 

19961997199819992000200120022003200420052006200720082009201020112012201320142015201620172018201920202021202220232024

*Note:* This calendar view maps the number of captures of **http://www.fmc.gov/**, *not* how many times the site was actually updated.

Look Up URL in general Internet Archive web collection.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
<CURRENCY> U.S. DOLLARS

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1998
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                1.00000
<CASH>                                          48,727
<SECURITIES>                                     4,079
<RECEIVABLES>                                   37,000
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                      2,503
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               172,620
<PP&E>                                          79,377
<DEPRECIATION>                                (15,908)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 407,822
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          117,608
<BONDS>                                         86,580
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         2,559
<OTHER-SE>                                     109,026
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   407,822
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               184,807
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  174,632
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                   729
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               8,510
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  9,339
<INCOME-TAX>                                    11,129
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (1,790)
<DISCONTINUED>                                (21,470)
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (23,260)
<EPS-BASIC>                                    (0.930)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  (0.920)


</TABLE>
490 P.2d 1233

#### STATE of New Mexico, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Robert James HEIM and Frederick W. Just, Defendants-Appellants.

No. 695.

Court of Appeals of New Mexico.

Nov. 12, 1971.

Fred M. Calkins, Jr., Matteucci, Franchini, Calkins & Michael, Albuquerque, for defendants-appellants.

David L. Norvell, Atty. Gen., C. Emery Cuddy, Jr., Asst. Atty. Gen., Santa Fe, for plaintiff-appellee.

OPINION

HENDLEY, Judge.

Convicted of burglary defendants appeal asserting three points for reversal. The first point, failure of the trial court to grant defendants’ motion for a directed verdict, is dispositive of the appeal. We reverse.

Shortly before 4:35 p. m. on September 11, 1970 the Cordeiro residence was burglarized. Among the items taken were two small novelty knives, a gun and a television set. An eye-witness identified one of the three men involved. The one identified is not involved in this action. Subsequently, at some time before 11:25 p. m: on September 11, 1970 the two defendants, in possession of the burglarized items at a motel, were arrested. This was some distance from the Cordeiro residence. The record is silent and there are no facts upon which inferences can be based as to how the defendants came into possession of the items taken from the Cordeiro residence.

Burglary is the unauthorized entry of a dwelling or other structure with intent to commit a felony or theft therein. Section 40A-16-3, N.M.S.A.1953 (Repl.Vol. 1970). Recently stolen property found in the possession of a defendant will not alone support a conclusion of guilt unless there is evidence of other circumstances connecting the defendant with the crime charged. State v. Graves, 73 N.M. 79, 385 P.2d 635 (1963). It is not enough that the testimony raised the strong suspicion of guilt. State v. Easterwood, 68 N.M. 464, 362 P.2d 997 (1961). The evidence and reasonable inferences that flow therefrom must exclude every reasonable hypothesis other than the guilt of the defendant. State v. Malouff, 81 N.M. 619, 471 P.2d 189 (Ct.App.1970).

Under the foregoing circumstances we cannot say that there are not other reasonable hypotheses which permit of defendants’ innocence in view of the evidence presented by the State. State v. Seal, 75 N.M. 608, 409 P.2d 128 (1965).

Since we reverse for a failure of proof, rather than an error in the trial proceedings, the cause is remanded with instructions to discharge the defendants. State v. Malouff, supra.

It is so ordered.

WOOD, C. J., and COWAN, J., concur.
---

Exhibit 99.5


CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 
18 U.S.C. §1350, 
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 In connection with the annual report of Silver Wheaton Corp. (the Company) on Form 40-F for the period ended December 31, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Peter Barnes, Chief Executive Officer and Director of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that: (1)
     The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and(2)
     The information contained in this Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
   March 30, 2011
     By: /s/ Peter BarnesPeter BarnesChief Executive Officer


---
§ 225.54 Recomputation when an employee is eligible for periodic pension payments based on other than railroad or social security earnings. ( a ) *Description.* This recomputation serves as a reduction in the PIA for entitlement to a periodic pension based, in part or in whole, on earnings after 1956 not covered under either the Social Security Act or the Railroad Retirement Act. A recomputation for a periodic pension is made in accordance with sections 215(a)(7) and 215(f)(9) of the Social Security Act. A recomputation affecting the Retirement Tier I, Overall Minimum, or Residual Lump-Sum PIA is required when all the following conditions exist— ( 1 ) The employee has less than 30 years of coverage as defined in section 215(a) of the Social Security Act. The years of coverage include railroad and social security earnings;
( 2 ) The employee becomes eligible for an annuity after 1985; and
( 3 ) The employee becomes eligible for the periodic pension payments after 1985 based, in part or in whole, on earnings after 1956 not covered under either the Social Security Act or the Railroad Retirement Act.
( b ) *Effective date of recomputation.* The Retirement Tier I, Overall Minimum or Residual Lump-Sum PIA is recomputed when the employee becomes eligible for a periodic pension payment based on other than railroad or social security earnings. However, payment of the recomputed PIA is effective with the month in which the employee becomes entitled to the periodic pension.
§ 404.1616 Medical consultants and psychological consultants. ( a ) *What is a medical consultant?* A medical consultant is a member of a team that makes disability determinations in a State agency (see § 404.1615), or who is a member of a team that makes disability determinations for us when we make disability determinations ourselves. The medical consultant completes the medical portion of the case review and any applicable residual functional capacity assessment about all physical impairment(s) in a claim.
( b ) *What qualifications must a medical consultant have?* A medical consultant is a licensed physician, as defined in § 404.1502(a)(1).
( c ) *What is a psychological consultant?* A psychological consultant is a member of a team that makes disability determinations in a State agency (see § 404.1615), or who is a member of a team that makes disability determinations for us when we make disability determinations ourselves. The psychological consultant completes the medical portion of the case review and any applicable residual functional capacity assessment about all mental impairment(s) in a claim. When we are unable to obtain the services of a qualified psychiatrist or psychologist despite making every reasonable effort (see § 404.1617) in a claim involving a mental impairment(s), a medical consultant will evaluate the mental impairment(s).
( d ) *What qualifications must a psychological consultant have?* A psychological consultant can be either a licensed psychiatrist or psychologist. We will only consider a psychologist qualified to be a psychological consultant if he or she: ( 1 ) Is licensed or certified as a psychologist at the independent practice level of psychology by the State in which he or she practices; and
( 2 ) ( i ) Possesses a doctorate degree in psychology from a program in clinical psychology of an educational institution accredited by an organization recognized by the Council on Post-Secondary Accreditation; or
( ii ) Is listed in a national register of health service providers in psychology which the Commissioner of Social Security deems appropriate; and
( 3 ) Possesses 2 years of supervised clinical experience as a psychologist in health service, at least 1 year of which is post-masters degree.
( e ) *Cases involving both physical and mental impairments.* In a case where there is evidence of both physical and mental impairments, the medical consultant will evaluate the physical impairments in accordance with paragraph (a) of this section, and the psychological consultant will evaluate the mental impairment(s) in accordance with paragraph (c) of this section.
[82 FR 5873, Jan. 18, 2017]