alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 10.915 What are the responsibilities of OWCP in the death gratuity payment process? ( a ) If the death gratuity payment process is initiated by the employing agency's submission of form CA-42, OWCP will identify living potential claimants. OWCP will make a reasonable effort to provide claim form CA-41s to any known potential claimants and provide instructions on how to file a claim for the death gratuity payment.
( b ) If the death gratuity payment process is initiated by a claimant's submission of a claim, OWCP will contact the employing agency and prompt it to submit form CA-42. OWCP will then review the information provided by both the claim and form CA-42, and OWCP will attempt to identify all living survivors or alternate beneficiaries who may be eligible for payment of the gratuity.
( c ) If OWCP determines that the evidence is not sufficient to meet the claimant's burden of proof, OWCP will notify the claimant of the additional evidence needed. The claimant will be allowed at least 30 days to submit the additional evidence required. OWCP may also request additional information from the employing agency.
( d ) OWCP will review the information provided by the claimant and information provided by the employing agency to determine whether the claim satisfies all the requirements listed in § 10.912.
( e ) OWCP will calculate the amount of the death gratuity payment and pay the beneficiaries as soon as possible after accepting the claim.
```

[Congressional Bills 116th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 5693 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

116th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 5693

  To amend title XVIII of the Social Security Act to expand Medicare 
  Rural Health Clinic Services and Federally Qualified Health Center 
             Services to include physical therapy services.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            January 28, 2020

Mr. Kind (for himself and Mrs. Walorski) introduced the following bill; 
  which was referred to the Committee on Energy and Commerce, and in 
    addition to the Committee on Ways and Means, for a period to be 
subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration 
  of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee 
                               concerned

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To amend title XVIII of the Social Security Act to expand Medicare 
  Rural Health Clinic Services and Federally Qualified Health Center 
             Services to include physical therapy services.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Primary Health Services Enhancement 
Act''.

SEC. 2. EXPANDING MEDICARE RURAL HEALTH CLINIC SERVICES AND FEDERALLY 
              QUALIFIED HEALTH CENTER SERVICES TO INCLUDE PHYSICAL 
              THERAPY SERVICES.

    (a) In General.--Section 1861(aa) of the Social Security Act (42 
U.S.C. 1395x(aa)) is amended--
            (1) in paragraph (1)--
                    (A) in subparagraph (B), by striking at the end 
                ``and'';
                    (B) by redesignating subparagraph (C) as 
                subparagraph (D); and
                    (C) by inserting after subparagraph (B) the 
                following new subparagraph:
                    ``(C) such physical therapy services (as defined in 
                subsection (p)) furnished by a physical therapist, 
                and'';
            (2) in paragraph (2)(A), by striking ``subparagraphs (A) 
        and (B)'' and inserting ``subparagraphs (A) through (C)''; and
            (3) in paragraph (3)(A), by striking ``subparagraphs (A) 
        through (C)'' and inserting ``subparagraphs (A) through (D)''.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendments made by subsection (a) shall 
apply with respect to services furnished on or after January 1, 2021.
                                 <all>
```
United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

June 30, 2005

Charles R. Fulbruge III

Clerk

In the

United States Court of Appeals

for the Fifth Circuit

_______________

m 02-41459

_______________

ANZEL KEON JONES,

Petitioner-Appellant,

VERSUS

DOUG DRETKE,

DIRECTOR, TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE,

CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTIONS DIVISION,

Respondent-Appellee.

_________________________

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Eastern District of Texas

m 6:99-CV-660

______________________________
2

ON REMAND FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES

Before HIGGINBOTHAM, SMITH, and

CLEMENT, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

*

This court affirmed the denial of Anzel

Jones’s petition for writ of habeas corpus.

Jones v. Cockrell, 74 Fed. Appx. 317 (5th Cir.

2003). The Supreme Court vacated and remanded for further consideration in light of

Roper v. Simmons, 125 S. Ct. 1183 (2005).

Jones v. Dretke, 125 S. Ct. 1588 (2005). We

requested and received supplemental letter

briefs addressing the impact of Simmons. We

take judicialnotice that after those letters were

received, the Governor of Texas commuted

Jones’s sentence to life imprisonment.

Allthe issues addressed in our prior opinion

are in regard only to the sentence of death.

Because Jones no longer faces a death sentence, those issues are now moot. The appeal,

accordingly, is DISMISSED.

* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published

and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.
#### James M. E. O’Grady, Appellant, v. Michael Doyle, Respondent.

Appeal dismissed, without costs, upon stipulation filed.
EXHIBIT 99.1 - ANNUAL FUNDS APPLICATION STATEMENT




                              [LOGO] JPMORGAN


June 30, 2005

    Hartford Life Global Funding Trusts - Annual Funds Application Statement

I, Albert P. Mari, Jr., being a duly appointed officer of JPMorgan Chase Bank,
N.A. ("Indenture Trustee"), do hereby certify on behalf of the Indenture
Trustee, that, with respect to Hartford Life Global Funding Trust 2005-047:





         1. I have reviewed and examined the application by the Indenture
Trustee, during the fiscal year ending June 15, 2005; of trust money collected
by the Indenture Trustee pursuant to Section 5.02 of the Indenture, pursuant to
which the trust's notes (the "Notes") were issued; and

         2. Based upon my review and examination, to the best of my knowledge,
during such fiscal year, the trust money collected by the Indenture Trustee was
properly applied, pursuant to Section 5.02 of the Indenture.

         Nothing herein shall constitute a representation as to the proper
application by the registered holder of the Notes or the trust of the trust
monies received by it.



JPMORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A., as Indenture Trustee
Worldwide Securities Services
4 New York Plaza, 15th Floor
New York, NY 10004


/s/ Albert P. Mari, Jr.


Name:  Albert P. Mari, Jr.
Title: Vice President


<TABLE>
<S><C>
JPMORGAN CHASE BANK o Institutional Trust Services o 4 New York Plaza, Floor 15, New York, NY 10004
</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1997
<CASH>                                           4,973
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    7,484
<ALLOWANCES>                                       891
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                         292,002
<DEPRECIATION>                                  54,876
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 264,520
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0
<BONDS>                                        175,282
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            39
<OTHER-SE>                                      77,289
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   264,520
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                25,424
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   15,025
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 4,605
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               7,762
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (1,183)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (1,183)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (1,183)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.30)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.30)
        

</TABLE>
#### § 1002.308 Who has legal standing to bring an action under USERRA?

An action may be brought only by the United States or by the person, or representative of a person, claiming rights or benefits under the Act. An employer, prospective employer or other similar entity may not bring an action under the Act.
#### § 6.65 General.

Extension of credit by an industry member to a retailer for a period of time in excess of 30 days from the date of delivery constitutes a means to induce within the meaning of the Act.

[T.D. ATF-364, 60 FR 20422, Apr. 26, 1995]
I 

114TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 3822 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to allow qualified scholarship 

funding corporations to access tax-exempt financing for alternative private student loans. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

OCTOBER 23, 2015 

Mr. FLORES introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Ways and Means 

A BILL 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to allow qualified scholarship funding corporations to access tax-exempt financing for alternative private student loans. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Student Loan Oppor5 tunity Act of 2015’’. 


emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 3822 IH

1 SEC. 2. QUALIFIED SCHOLARSHIP FUNDING CORPORATION 

2 TAX-EXEMPT FINANCING FOR ALTERNATIVE 

3 PRIVATE STUDENT LOANS. 

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 150(d)(2)(A) of the Inter5 nal Revenue Code of 1986 is amended— 

6 (1) by striking ‘‘established and’’, 

7 (2) by striking ‘‘incurred under the Higher 

8 Education Act of 1965’’, and 

9 (3) by inserting ‘‘and performing student assist10 ance related activities’’ after ‘‘student loan notes’’. 

11 (b) STUDENT ASSISTANCE RELATED ACTIVITIES.— 

12 Section 150(d) of such Code is amended by adding at the 

13 end the following new paragraph: 

14 ‘‘(4) STUDENT ASSISTANCE RELATED ACTIVI15 TIES.—For purposes of this subsection, the term 

16 ‘student assistance related activities’ includes main17 taining loan documentation, handling communica18 tions with schools and borrowers, monitoring the 

19 student borrower’s location and continued enroll20 ment, default prevention, offering borrower edu21 cation and college access programs, borrower out22 reach and financial literacy training, disseminating 

23 information about student loan programs and higher 

24 education finance matters, and similar charitable 

25 and educational activities.’’. 


emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with BILLS
3 

•HR 3822 IH

1 (c) REQUALIFICATION AS QUALIFIED SCHOLARSHIP

2 FUNDING CORPORATION.—Section 150(d) of such Code, 

3 as amended by subsection (b), is amended by adding at 

4 the end the following new paragraph: 

5 ‘‘(5) REQUALIFICATION AS QUALIFIED SCHOL6 ARSHIP FUNDING CORPORATION.—A corporation 

7 that meets the requirements of subparagraphs (A) 

8 and (B) of section 150(d)(2) shall not fail to be 

9 treated as a qualified scholarship funding corpora10 tion solely because such corporation ceased to be a 

11 corporation described in section 150(d)(2) after the 

12 date of the enactment of the Health Care and Edu13 cation Reconciliation Act of 2010.’’. 

14 (d) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendments made by 

15 this section shall apply to bonds issued after the date of 

16 the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with BILLS
§ 404.1913 Precluding dual coverage. ( a ) *General.* Employment or self-employment or services recognized as equivalent under the Act or the social security system of the foreign country shall, on or after the effective date of the agreement, result in a period of coverage under the U.S. system or under the foreign system, but not under both. Methods shall be set forth in the agreement for determining under which system the employment, self-employment, or other service shall result in a period of coverage.
( b ) *Principles for precluding dual coverage.* ( 1 ) An agreement precludes dual coverage by assigning responsibility for coverage to the U.S. or a foreign country. An agreement may modify the coverage provisions of title II of the Act to accomplish this purpose. Where an agreement assigns coverage to the foreign country, it may exempt from coverage services otherwise covered by the Act. Where an agreement assigns coverage to the U.S., it may extend coverage to services not otherwise covered by the Act but only for taxable years beginning on or after April 20, 1983.
( 2 ) If the work would otherwise be covered by both countries, an agreement will exempt it from coverage by one of the countries.
( 3 ) Generally, an agreement will provide that a worker will be covered by the country in which he or she is employed and will be exempt from coverage by the other country. Example: A U.S. national employed in XYZ country by an employer located in the United States will be covered by XYZ country and exempt from U.S. coverage.
( 4 ) An agreement may provide exceptions to the principle stated in paragraph (b)(3) of this section so that a worker will be covered by the country to which he or she has the greater attachment. Example: A U.S. national sent by his employer located in the United States to work temporarily for that employer in XYZ country will be covered by the United States and will be exempt from coverage by XYZ country.
( 5 ) Generally, if a national of either country resides in one country and has self employment income that is covered by both countries, an agreement will provide that the person will be covered by the country in which he or she resides and will be exempt from coverage by the other country.
( 6 ) Agreements may provide for variations from the general principles for precluding dual coverage to avoid inequitable or anomalous coverage situations for certain workers. However, in all cases coverage must be provided by one of the countries.
[44 FR 42964, July 23, 1979, as amended at 50 FR 36575, Sept. 9, 1985]
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY

 10,087

 10,434

 10,732

 10,873

 10,863

 10,810

 10,655

 10,418

 10,168

 9,770

 9,433

 9,251

 9,267

 9,175

 9,254

 9,267

 9,466

 9,458

 9,703

 9,847

 10,022

 10,475

 11,181

 11,920

 12,465

 13,093

 13,668

 14,118

 14,389

 14,463

 14,342

 42,718

 42,882

 43,127

 43,590

 44,118

 44,611

 45,182

 45,837

 46,473

 47,139

 47,819

 48,409

 48,858

 49,451

 50,015

 50,603

 51,047

 51,663

 52,166

 52,660

 53,116

 53,608

 54,188

 55,053

 56,201

 57,417

 58,714

 60,009

 61,331

 62,941

 64,586

STORAGE - A.F. 

 52,805

 53,316

 53,859

 54,463

 54,981

 55,421

 55,837

 56,255

 56,641

 56,909

 57,252

 57,660

 58,125

 58,626

 59,269

 59,870

 60,513

 61,121

 61,869

 62,507

 63,138

 64,083

 65,369

 66,973

 68,666

 70,510

 72,382

 74,127

 75,720

 77,404

 78,928

417

573

603

635

725

542

491

530

424

647

485

512

512

573

885

578

576

594

765

649

462

618

1,104

1,023

978

1,029

1,072

1,063

863

688

675

642

831

877

966

986

764

701

741

619

782

658

718

746

826

1,209

881

900

901

1,142

971

780

1,094

1,752

1,832

1,832

1,959

2,016

1,943

1,666

1,537

1,443

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

MARCH 2022 FULL NATURAL FLOW AT NEW MELONES DAM RUN DATE: 04/05/2022

TOTALS +26,570 34,715

* October 1,

68,857

 234.5

 236.1

 237.9

 239.8

 241.7

 243.2

 244.6

 246.1

 247.3

 248.9

 250.2

 251.6

 253.1

 254.7

 257.1

 258.9

 260.7

 262.5

 264.7

 266.6

 268.2

 270.4

 273.8

 277.5

 281.1

 285.0

 289.0

 292.8

 296.1

 299.2

 302.1

DONNELLS

RES

BEARDSLEY

RES

2021 TO DATE

NEW

MELONES

INFLOW

C.F.S

NATURAL

RIVER

C.F.S

ACCUM *

FULL

NATURAL

1000 A.F.

RESERVOIR

TOTAL

+447

+511

+543

+604

+518

+440

+416

+418

+386

+268

+343

+408

+465

+501

+643

+601

+643

+608

+748

+638

+631

+945

+1,286

+1,604

+1,693

+1,844

+1,872

+1,745

+1,593

+1,684

+1,524

CHANGE

A.F. C.F.S.

+225

+258

+274

+305

+261

+222

+210

+211

+195

+135

+173

+206

+234

+253

+324

+303

+324

+307

+377

+322

+318

+476

+648

+809

+854

+930

+944

+880

+803

+849

+768

ACRE-FEET
### §§5371 to 5373. Repealed. Pub. L. 103–382, title III, §391(l), Oct. 20, 1994, 108 Stat. 4023

Section 5371, Pub. L. 101–589, title V, §501, Nov. 16, 1990, 104 Stat. 2898, required science education report.

Section 5372, Pub. L. 101–589, title V, §502, Nov. 16, 1990, 104 Stat. 2898, required general education reports.

Section 5373, Pub. L. 101–589, title V, §503, Nov. 16, 1990, 104 Stat. 2899, related to Department of Energy programs.
§ 404.370 Who is entitled to parent's benefits? You may be entitled to parent's benefits on the earnings record of someone who has died and was fully insured. You are entitled to these benefits if all the following conditions are met: ( a ) You are related to the insured person as his or her parent in one of the ways described in § 404.374.
( b ) You are at least 62 years old.
( c ) You have not married since the insured person died.
( d ) You apply.
( e ) You are not entitled to an old-age benefit equal to or larger than the parent's benefit amount.
( f ) You were receiving at least one-half of your support from the insured at the time he or she died, or at the beginning of any period of disability he or she had that continued up to death. See § 404.366(b) for a definition of *one-half support.* If you were receiving one-half of your support from the insured at the time of the insured's death, you must give us proof of this support within 2 years of the insured's death. If you were receiving one-half of your support from the insured at the time his or her period of disability began, you must give us proof of this support within 2 years of the month in which the insured filed his or her application for the period of disability. You must file the evidence of support even though you may not be eligible for parent's benefits until a later time. There are two exceptions to the 2-year filing requirement: ( 1 ) If there is a good cause for failure to provide proof of support within the 2-year period, we will consider the proof you give us as though it were provided within the 2-year period. Good cause does not exist if you were informed of the need to provide the proof within the 2-year period and you neglected to do so or did not intend to do so. Good cause will be found to exist if you did not provide the proof within the time limit due to— ( i ) Circumstances beyond your control, such as extended illness, mental or physical incapacity, or a language barrier;
( ii ) Incorrect or incomplete information we furnished you;
( iii ) Your efforts to get proof of the support without realizing that you could submit the proof after you gave us some other evidence of that support; or
( iv ) Unusual or unavoidable circumstances that show you could not reasonably be expected to know of the 2-year time limit.
( 2 ) The Soldiers' and Sailors' Civil Relief Act of 1940 provides for extending the filing time.
§ 355.37 Initial decision. ( a ) The ALJ shall issue an initial decision based only on the record, which shall contain findings of fact, conclusions of law, and the amount of any penalties and assessments imposed.
( b ) The findings of fact shall include a finding on each of the following issues: ( 1 ) Whether the claims or statements identified in the complaint, or any portions thereof, violate § 355.3;
( 2 ) If the person is liable for penalties or assessments, the appropriate amount of any such penalties or assessments considering any mitigating or aggravating factors that he or she finds in the case, such as those described in § 355.31.
( c ) The ALJ shall promptly serve the initial decision on all parties within 90 days after the time for submission of post-hearing briefs and reply briefs (if permitted) has expired. The ALJ shall at the same time serve all defendants with a statement describing the right of any defendant determined to be liable for a civil penalty or assessment to file a motion for reconsideration with the ALJ or a notice of appeal with the authority head. If the ALJ fails to meet the deadline contained in this paragraph, he or she shall notify the parties of the reason for the delay and shall set a new deadline.
( d ) Unless the initial decision of the ALJ is timely appealed to the authority head, or a motion for reconsideration of the initial decision is timely filed, the initial decision shall constitute the final decision of the authority head and shall be final and binding on the parties 30 days after it is issued by the ALJ.
### §1644d. Claims based on ownership interest in or debt or other obligation owing by corporations or other legal entities

#### (a) Nationals of the United States; charge on property

A claim under section 1644b of this title based upon an ownership interest in any corporation, association, or other entity which is a national of the United States, shall not be considered. A claim under section 1644b of this title based upon a debt or other obligation owing by any corporation, association, or other entity organized under the laws of the United States, or of any State, the District of Columbia, or the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico shall be considered only when such debt or other obligation is a charge on property which has been nationalized, expropriated, or taken by the German Democratic Republic.

#### (b) Direct ownership

A claim under section 1644b of this title based upon a direct ownership interest in a corporation, association, or other entity for loss, shall be considered subject to the provisions of this subchapter, if such corporation, association or other entity on the date of the loss was not a national of the United States, without regard to the per centum of ownership vested in the claimant.

#### (c) Indirect ownership

A claim under section 1644b of this title for losses based upon an indirect ownership interest in a corporation, association, or other entity, shall be considered, subject to the other provisions of this subchapter, only if at least 25 per centum of the entire ownership interest thereof, at the time of such loss, was vested in nationals of the United States.

#### (d) Computation of award

The amount of any claim covered by subsections (b) or (c) of this section shall be calculated on the basis of the total loss suffered by such corporation, association, or other entity, and shall bear the same proportion to such loss as the ownership interest of the claimant at the time of loss bears to the entire ownership interest thereof.

(Mar. 10, 1950, ch. 54, title VI, §604, as added Pub. L. 94–542, Oct. 18, 1976, 90 Stat. 2510.)