alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EX-10.31



 Exhibit 10.31 

AMENDMENT TO EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT 

This Amendment to Employment Agreement (the “Amendment”) is entered into as of April 9, 2015, by and between The J. M. Smucker
Company, an Ohio corporation, with its principal place of business in Orrville, Ohio (the “Company”), and David J. West (the “Executive”). 

RECITALS 
 WHEREAS, the
parties entered into an Employment Agreement dated February 3, 2015 (the “Agreement) and now wish to amend the Agreement. 

WHEREAS, in the Agreement Executive’s Inducement Grant vesting date was set using the anniversary of the Effective Date of the Agreement
and the parties have agreed to change the vesting date to the end of the Company’s fiscal year. 
 NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of
the promises, covenants and agreements of the parties, and the mutual benefits they will gain by the performance of the promises herein, and other good and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which are hereby acknowledged, the
parties do hereby agree as follows: 
 AGREEMENT 

Amend Section 2, Compensation and Benefits, to read 

(b) Inducement Grant. Within thirty (30) calendar days following the Effective Date, subject to the approval of the Committee, Executive
shall receive an option grant in the amount of One Hundred Twenty Five Thousand (125,000) options (the “Options”), which Options shall have an exercise price equal to the fair market value of the Company’s common stock on the
date of grant. The Options will be service and performance based with a three (3) year ratable vesting schedule (33% of the Options will vest, assuming performance objectives are met and subject to continued service through the applicable
vesting date, which will be the end of each of the first three (3) fiscal years, beginning with the fiscal year ending April 30, 2016, with objectives established by the Committee in its discretion; provided, that, the applicable
performance goals shall be consistent with those applicable to performance-based awards granted to similarly situated executives of the Company). Vested Options shall have an exercise term for the earlier of ten (10) years following the date of
the grant or three (3) years following termination of services to the Company either as an employee or a member of the Board. The Options shall not be subject to any restrictive covenants, if any, broader than the covenants set forth in this
Agreement. 
 [SIGNATURE LINES ON NEXT PAGE] 







 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have executed and delivered this Amendment to Employment
Agreement as of the date first written above. 
  

			
	COMPANY:
	
	The J. M. Smucker Company
		
	By:		 /s/ Richard K. Smucker

			Richard K. Smucker
	
	EXECUTIVE:
	
	 /s/ David J. West

	David J. West
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

DAY HIGH

 16,387

 16,959

 17,601

 17,790

 18,050

 18,327

 16,691

 15,783

 16,047

 16,424

 17,407

 18,501

 17,779

 17,397

 17,431

 17,498

 17,388

 16,839

 15,954

 16,373

 16,855

 15,431

 14,000

 17,248

 15,458

 13,499

 13,021

 13,511

 15,286

 14,022

 7,606

 8,261

 7,603

 7,370

 7,750

 7,805

 7,787

 7,854

 8,047

 9,022

 9,327

 10,635

 9,142

 9,402

 8,535

 8,694

 8,302

 7,886

 7,162

 7,236

 7,433

 8,032

 7,457

 8,194

 8,383

 6,630

 6,323

 6,248

 6,102

 4,749

 11,684

 12,285

 12,405

 12,669

 12,998

 13,264

 12,323

 11,789

 12,115

 12,746

 13,552

 14,319

 13,571

 12,872

 12,791

 13,040

 12,523

 12,251

 12,067

 12,209

 12,612

 12,366

 11,088

 12,720

 11,442

 9,968

 8,953

 9,075

 10,297

 8,809

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

NOVEMBER 2001 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: December 18, 2001

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

PITTSBURG BOTTOM ON THE SACRAMENTO RIVER
Exhibit 31.2

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO

SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT

I, Paul Herendeen, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this Amendment No. 1 on Form 10-K/A to the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Warner Chilcott Limited;

2.
Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading
with respect to the period covered by this report.

Date: April 17, 2009



/s/ Paul HerendeenName: Paul Herendeen Title: Executive Vice President and
Chief Financial Officer
§ 404.358 Who is the insured's grandchild or stepgrandchild? ( a ) *Grandchild and stepgrandchild defined.* You may be eligible for benefits as the insured's grandchild or stepgrandchild if you are the natural child, adopted child, or stepchild of a person who is the insured's child as defined in §§ 404.355 through 404.357, or § 404.359. Additionally, for you to be eligible as a grandchild or stepgrandchild, your natural or adoptive parents must have been either deceased or under a disability, as defined in § 404.1501(a), at the time your grandparent or stepgrandparent became entitled to old-age or disability benefits or died; or if your grandparent or stepgrandparent had a period of disability that continued until he or she became entitled to benefits or died, at the time the period of disability began. If your parent is deceased, for purposes of determining whether the conditions of entitlement are met *throughout* the first month as stated in § 404.352(a)(2)(i), your parent will be considered to be deceased as of the first day of the month of death.
( b ) *Legally adopted grandchild or stepgrandchild.* If you are the insured's grandchild or stepgrandchild and you are legally adopted by the insured or by the insured's surviving spouse after his or her death, you are considered an adopted child and the dependency requirements of § 404.362 must be met.
[44 FR 34481, June 15, 1979, as amended at 48 FR 21928, May 16, 1983]
```

[113th Congress Public Law 199]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]

[[Page 128 STAT. 2058]]

Public Law 113-199
113th Congress

              An Act

 
  To amend the Federal charter of the Veterans of Foreign Wars of the 
United States to reflect the service of women in the Armed Forces of the 
                             United States.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,
SECTION 1. REFLECTION OF SERVICE OF WOMEN IN THE ARMED FORCES IN 
                              THE FEDERAL CHARTER OF THE VETERANS 
                              OF FOREIGN WARS OF THE UNITED 
                              STATES.

    (a) Organization.--Section 230101(a) of title 36, United States 
Code, is amended by striking ``men'' and inserting ``veterans''.
    (b) Purposes.--Section 230102(3) of such title is amended by 
striking ``widows'' and inserting ``surviving spouses''.

    Approved December 4, 2014.

LEGISLATIVE HISTORY--H.R. 5441:
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

HOUSE REPORTS: No. 113-620 (Comm. on the Judiciary).
CONGRESSIONAL RECORD, Vol. 160 (2014):
            Nov. 17, considered and passed House.
            Nov. 20, considered and passed Senate.

                                  <all>
```
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY ELEVATION

 238.96

 243.40

 239.92

 239.10

 238.90

 238.74

 238.62

 238.60

 238.60

 238.61

 238.60

 238.59

 238.57

 238.55

 238.54

 238.54

 238.53

 238.54

 240.54

 242.75

 243.15

 242.70

 247.45

 241.78

 240.13

 240.06

 243.21

 248.31

 254.01

 248.90

 253.98

 346

 1,014

 460

 362

 340

 323

 311

 309

 309

 310

 309

 308

 306

 304

 303

 303

 302

 303

 545

 893

 965

 884

 1,976

 729

 488

 478

 977

 2,236

 4,731

 2,427

 4,714

STORAGE

-58

+668

-554

-98

-22

-17

-12

-2

+0

+1

-1

-1

-2

-2

-1

+0

-1

+1

+242

+348

+72

-81

+1,092

-1,247

-241

-10

+499

+1,259

+2,495

-2,304

+2,287

CHANGE

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 70

 75

 75

 75

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 8,750

 26,000

 9,775

 8,050

 7,450

 7,200

 6,790

 6,730

 6,700

 6,640

 6,570

 6,550

 6,490

 6,470

 6,450

 6,410

 6,410

 6,530

 16,900

 19,200

 26,800

 27,600

 37,300

 5,000

 5,000

 15,000

 15,000

 8,000

 39,000

 8,000

 35,000

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

DECEMBER 2005 RED BLUFF DIVERSION RESERVOIR DAILY OPERATIONS RUN DATE: March 14, 2006

IN LAKE

CANAL

 ACRE-FEET

TOTALS +4,310 295 403,765

ACRE-FEET +4,310 585 800,868

SUMMARY

RELEASE (ACRE-FEET)

TOTAL 801,453

 404

RELEASE

RIVER

CORNING TO SACTO

CANAL

RELEASE C.F.S.

TEHAMA

COLUSA

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

CORNING CANAL 0

TEHAMA-COLUSA CANAL 585

TO SACTO RIVER 800,868

Table 9
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from 
National Property Investors 7 1998 First Quarter 10-QSB and is qualified 
in its entirety by reference to such 10-QSB filing.
</LEGEND>
<CIK> 0000732439
<NAME> NATIONAL PROPERTY INVESTORS 7
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                    3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1998   
<CASH>                                           2,055
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0<F1>
<PP&E>                                          45,494
<DEPRECIATION>                                  24,500   
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  24,650   
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0<F1>
<BONDS>                                         20,275     
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0     
<PREFERRED>                                          0  
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                       3,761    
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    24,650    
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 1,792    
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 1,868    
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 410    
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                      0
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                      (76)     
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (1.24)<F2>
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
<FN>
<F1>Registrant has an unclassified balance sheet.
<F2>Multiplier is 1.
</FN>
        


</TABLE>
Partner

Profile

Company Profile

Headquarters Location

Van Buren, Arkansas

Contact:

Chris Carter,

Technical Development

SmartWay Transport

Partnership Representative

(479) 471-3873

gccarte@usa-truck.com

Number of Employees:

3,300

Strategy Category:

Idle reduction

Number of Trailers:

5,972

Number of Power Units:

2,565

USA Truck

http://www.epa.gov/smartway

I

n 2005, USA Truck became a member of the SmartWay Transport

Partnership. USA Truck’s idle reduction strategy is multi-pronged, but centers around three core goals: (1) training drivers about the financial and

environmental benefits of saving fuel, (2) providing drivers with the necessary

resources to reduce idle times, and (3) monitoring idle times and holding each

driver accountable for his/her own idling. Strategies to reduce idle times include

auxiliary power units, block heaters and automatic engine shutoff devices. USA

Truck estimates that each truck using these three strategies will save 1500 gallons of fuel per year. At today’s fuel prices, this amounts to a per-truck savings

of over $4,000!

USA Truck began by testing an over-the-road tractor equipped with an APU in

2004. This tractor traveled 230,000 miles and saved 2160 gallons of fuel due to

APU use, accounting for a 6 percent increase in fuel efficiency. USA Truck has

been able to eliminate one oil drain per year on its trucks with APUs because of

reduced idling. It also found that the yearly maintenance costs for an APU are

roughly equal to the cost of this single oil drain. USA Truck estimates a return

on investment for its APUs of 1.5 to 2 years. By the end of 2006, USA Truck

had 25 APUs in its fleet; these APUs combined to save over 27,000 gallons of

fuel!

In the coming years, USA Truck plans to adopt new strategies to save even

more fuel. These strategies include fuel efficient tires, using more low-friction

engine lubricants and improved aerodynamics. Chris Carter, manager of

Technical Development and Fuel Economy, said: “At USA Truck, our goal is to

meet or exceed our customer’s expectations in all that we do, which includes

being as efficient as possible in our operations. We aim to reduce fuel consumption, which in turn reduces our environmental footprint, by adopting fuel

efficient strategies and utilizing fuel saving technologies. Becoming a partner

with SmartWay was a natural fit in our objective to improving efficiency.”

Idle Reduction 

EPA420-F-07-013
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5, the Court has determined that this opinion should not be

published and is not precedent except under the limit ed circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5.4. IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 98-40182

(Summary Calendar)

MARY ESTRELLO,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus

TOWN OF FLOWER MOUND;

DAVE BRUNGARDT; JAMES RONALD

RAGLAND,

Defendants-Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Eastern District of Texas

(96-CV-276)

August 26, 1998

Before JOLLY, SMITH and WIENER, Circuit Judges.

Per Curiam *

In this appeal from the dismissal of her civil rights claims asserted under 42 U.S.C. § 1983,

Plaintiff-Appellant Mary Estrello asks us to reverse the district court’s grant of summary judgment

in favor of Defendants-Appellees Dave Brungardt and James Ronald Ragland, on grounds of qualified

immunit y, and in

favo r o f Defendant-Appellee the Town of Flower Mound, rejecting municipal

liabilit y on grounds of Estrello’s failure to demonstrate an underlying constitutional deprivation by

an official vested with policymaking authority. More specifically, Estrello complains that the district

court erred in concluding that her “speech” did not address matters of public concern

— contending2

that the court examined the wrong speech to reach that conclusion — and thus erred in concluding

that she did not establish a constitutional deprivation. Estrello also asserts that the district court erred

in making factual findings in its review of the summary judgment evidence submitted.

We have carefully reviewed the Memorandum Opinion and Order of the district court in light

of the entire summary judgment record and the legal arguments made in the briefs filed in this appeal

by able counsel for Estrello and for the defendants. In our d e novo review of the district court’s grant

of summary judgment dismissing Estrello’s claims against all defendants-appellees, we have reached

the same conclusions as did the district court, for essentially the same reasons set forth in that court’s

comprehensive and well-crafted opinion. Consequently, no useful purpose would be served by our

writing separately, as doing so would merely constitute a redundant waste of judicial resources, which

we decline to do. Therefore, the summary judgment of the district court is, in all respects,

AFFIRMED.
H. R. 3969 

One Hundred Fourteenth Congress 

of the 

United States of America 

AT THE SECOND SESSION 

Begun and held at the City of Washington on Monday, 

the fourth day of January, two thousand and sixteen 

An Act 

To designate the Department of Veterans Affairs community-based outpatient clinic 

in Laughlin, Nevada, as the ‘‘Master Chief Petty Officer Jesse Dean VA Clinic’’. 

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of 

the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

SECTION 1. MASTER CHIEF PETTY OFFICER JESSE DEAN VA CLINIC. 

(a) DESIGNATION.—The Department of Veterans Affairs community-based outpatient clinic in Laughlin, Nevada, shall after the 

date of the enactment of this Act be known and designated as 

the ‘‘Master Chief Petty Officer Jesse Dean VA Clinic’’. 

(b) REFERENCES.—Any reference in a law, map, regulation, 

document, paper, or other record of the United States to the community-based outpatient clinic referred to in subsection (a) shall be 

deemed to be a reference to the ‘‘Master Chief Petty Officer Jesse 

Dean VA Clinic’’. 

Speaker of the House of Representatives. 

Vice President of the United States and

President of the Senate.
Decision IX/6: Critical-use exemptions for methyl bromide

1. To apply the following criteria and procedure in assessing a critical methyl bromide use for 

the purposes of control measures in Article 2 of the Protocol: 

 

(a) That a use of methyl bromide should qualify as “critical” only if the nominating Party 

determines that: 

(i) The specific use is critical because the lack of availability of methyl bromide 

for that use would result in significant market disruption; and 

(ii) There are no technically and economically feasible alternatives or substitutes 

available to the user that are acceptable from the standpoint of environment and 

health and are suitable to the crops and circumstances of the nomination,” 

(b) That production and consumption, if any, of methyl bromide for critical uses should 

be permitted only if: 

(i) All technically and economically feasible steps have been taken to minimize the 

critical use and any associated emission of methyl bromide; 

(ii) Methyl bromide is not available in sufficient quantity and quality from existing 

stocks of banked or recycled methyl bromide, also bearing in mind the developing 

countries’ need for methyl bromide; 

(iii) It is demonstrated that an appropriate effort is being made to evaluate, 

commercialize and secure national regulatory approval of alternatives and 

substitutes, taking into consideration the circumstances of the particular 

nomination and the special needs of Article 5 Parties, including lack of financial 

and expert resources, institutional capacity, and information. Non-Article 5 

Parties must demonstrate that research programmes are in place to develop and 

deploy alternatives and substitutes. Article 5 Parties must demonstrate that 

feasible alternatives shall be adopted as soon as they are confirmed as suitable to 

the Party’s specific conditions and/or that they have applied to the Multilateral 

Fund or other sources for assistance in identifying, evaluating, adapting, and 

demonstrating such options; 

2. To request the Technology and Economic Assessment Panel to review nominations and make 

recommendations based on the criteria established in paragraphs 1 (a) (ii) and 1 (b) of the 

present decision; 
3. That the present decision will apply to Parties operating under Article 5 and Parties not so 

operating only after the phase-out date applicable to those Parties;
### §4018. Employee protection

No State or local educational agency receiving assistance under this subchapter may discharge any employee or otherwise discriminate against any employee with respect to the employee's compensation, terms, conditions, or privileges of employment because the employee has brought to the attention of the public information concerning any asbestos problem in the school buildings within the jurisdiction of such agency.

(Pub. L. 98–377, title V, §509, Aug. 11, 1984, 98 Stat. 1294; Pub. L. 101–637, §14(a)(9), Nov. 28, 1990, 104 Stat. 4594.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

1990—Pub. L. 101–637 inserted section catchline.
```

[Congressional Bills 114th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 4007 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

114th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 4007

     To amend the Immigration and Nationality Act to require U.S. 
    Immigration and Customs Enforcement, upon the request of a law 
  enforcement official, to make a prompt determination of whether to 
 issue a detainer in the case of an alien arrested for a violation of 
                     Federal, State, or local law.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           November 16, 2015

Mr. Carter of Georgia introduced the following bill; which was referred 
                   to the Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
     To amend the Immigration and Nationality Act to require U.S. 
    Immigration and Customs Enforcement, upon the request of a law 
  enforcement official, to make a prompt determination of whether to 
 issue a detainer in the case of an alien arrested for a violation of 
                     Federal, State, or local law.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Assuring Law Enforcement Requests 
Are Timely Evaluated by the Department of Homeland Security Act of 
2015'' or the ``ALERTED Act of 2015''.

SEC. 2. DETERMINATION OF ISSUANCE OF DETAINER.

    Section 287(d) of the Immigration and Nationality Act (8 U.S.C. 
1357(d)) is amended in the matter preceding paragraph (1), by striking 
``relating to controlled substances''.
                                 <all>
```
### SUBCHAPTER II—WESTERN HEMISPHERIC CENTER
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

DAY HIGH

 17,593

 20,224

 19,224

 21,008

 16,318

 13,891

 17,935

 19,498

 19,412

 16,430

 17,461

 20,557

 20,320

 20,967

 21,236

 19,577

 19,670

 18,753

 19,300

 20,878

 21,749

 21,691

 22,535

 20,958

 19,118

 18,249

 19,748

 20,457

 21,367

 22,448

 6,815

 6,624

 6,441

 5,996

 4,389

 7,770

 7,431

 7,324

 6,883

 6,651

 7,468

 9,037

 9,310

 8,789

 9,499

 7,962

 8,303

 7,695

 8,196

 9,062

 5,665

 9,341

 9,405

 8,989

 5,238

 9,188

 9,016

 10,077

 10,888

 10,349

 11,571

 12,164

 12,228

 10,924

 8,482

 9,943

 11,928

 12,118

 13,027

 12,336

 11,817

 12,791

 13,062

 13,118

 13,623

 12,603

 13,539

 11,872

 13,709

 14,984

 14,114

 15,727

 16,021

 15,436

 13,146

 14,191

 13,958

 14,044

 14,999

 15,489

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

JUNE 2016 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: July 25, 2016

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

PORT CHICAGO TOP IN SUISUN BAY