alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 12.2
 CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF
THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
      a.
    
    designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our
supervision, to ensure that material information relating to Qiao Xing
Mobile, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us
by others within those entities, particularly during the period in
which this report is being prepared;b.
    
    designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused
such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under
our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the
reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial
statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted
accounting principles;c.
    
    evaluated the effectiveness of Qiao Xing Mobiles disclosure controls
and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the
effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end
of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; andd.
    
    disclosed in this report any change in Qiao Xing Mobiles internal
control over financial reporting that occurred during the period
covered by the annual report that has materially affected, or is
reasonably likely to materially affect, Qiao Xing Mobiles internal
control over financial reporting; and
  a.
    
    all significant deficiencies and material
weaknesses in the design or operation of internal
control over financial reporting which are
reasonably likely to adversely affect Qiao Xing
Mobiles ability to record, process, summarize
and report financial information; andb.
    
    any fraud, whether or not material, that involves
management or other employees who have a
significant role in Qiao Xing Mobiles internal
control over financial reporting.
 Date: June 30, 2011
    By:
    /s/ Kok Seong TanKok Seong TanChief Financial Officer
EXHIBIT 31.1 - SECTION 302 CERTIFICATION



                                  CERTIFICATION



I, Kenneth McCullum, certify that:


1.       I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K, and all reports on
         Form 8-K containing distribution or servicing reports filed in respect
         of the periods included in the year covered by this annual report of
         Hartford Life Global Funding Trust 2005-044;

2.       Based on my knowledge, the information in these reports, taken as a
         whole, does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit
         to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in
         light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not
         misleading as of the last day of the period covered by this annual
         report;

3.       Based on my knowledge, the distribution or servicing information
         required to be provided to the depositor by the trustee under the
         pooling and servicing, or similar agreement, for inclusion in these
         reports is included in these reports;

4.       I am responsible for reviewing the activities performed by the
         depositor and the trustee under the pooling and servicing, or similar
         agreement, and based upon my knowledge and the annual compliance review
         required under that agreement, and except as disclosed in the reports,
         the depositor and trustee have each fulfilled its obligations under
         that agreement; and

5.       The reports disclose all significant deficiencies relating to the
         trustee's or depositor's compliance with the minimum servicing or
         similar standards based upon the report provided by an independent
         public accountant, after conducting a review in compliance with the
         Uniform Single Attestation Program for Mortgage Bankers or similar
         procedure, as set forth in the pooling and servicing, or similar
         agreements, that is included in these reports.

In giving the certifications above, I have reasonably relied on information
provided to me by the following unaffiliated parties:

                  JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. and its officers and agents



Date: August 9, 2005

/s/ Kenneth McCullum

Kenneth McCullum
Vice President & Actuary
Hartford Life Insurance Company, as depositor
**EXHIBIT 32.2**

Certification Required by 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 (as adopted pursuant toSection 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002)

I, Michael Hull, as Chief Financial Officer of BabyUniverse, Inc. (the“Company”), certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 (as adoptedpursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002), that to myknowledge:

| 1.     | the accompanying Annual Report on Form 10-K of the Company for the annual periodended December 31, 2006 (the “Report”), as filed with the U.S.Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, fully complies with therequirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities and Exchange Act of1934, as amended; and |
|--------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                    |
| 2.     | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all materialrespects the financial condition and results of operations of theCompany.                                                                                                                                                                                       |

| Date: April 2,   2007 |   | /s/   MICHAEL   HULL |
|-----------------------|--------|-------------------------------------|
|                  |   |                                     |
|                  |   | **Michael Hull**                    |
|                  |   | **Chief Financial Officer**         |
###### Editorial Note on Part 45

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 45 appear by T.D. ATF-460, 66 FR 39093, July 27, 2001.

#### § 45.37 Assessment.

Whenever any person required by law to pay tax on tobacco products, and cigarette papers and tubes fails to pay such tax, the tax shall be ascertained and assessed against such person, subject to the limitations prescribed in 26 U.S.C. 6501. The tax so assessed shall be in addition to the penalties imposed by law for failure to pay such tax when required. Except in cases where delay may jeopardize collection of the tax, or where the amount is nominal or the result of an evident mathematical error, no such assessment shall be made until and after notice has been afforded such person to show cause against assessment. The person will be allowed 45 days from the date of such notice to show cause, in writing, against such assessment.

(72 Stat. 1417; 26 U.S.C. 5703)

[T.D. 6871, 31 FR 57, Jan. 14, 1966. Redesignated at 40 FR 16835, Apr. 15, 1975, and amended by T.D. ATF-48, 44 FR 55856, Sept. 28, 1979; T.D. ATF-232, 51 FR 28090, Aug. 5, 1986; T.D. ATF-243, 51 FR 43194, Dec. 1, 1986]
FIRST DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

STATE OF FLORIDA

_____________________________

No. 1D17-5331

_____________________________

Z.T., mother of E.L.F., II and 

Z.A.T., minor children,

Appellant,

v.

FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF 

CHILDREN AND FAMILIES,

Appellee.

_____________________________

On appeal from the Circuit Court for Escambia County.

Michael G. Allen, Judge.

July 5, 2018

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED. 

B.L. THOMAS, C.J., and OSTERHAUS and BILBREY, JJ., concur.

_____________________________

Not final until disposition of any timely and 

authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 

9.331.

_____________________________
2

W. Douglas White, Northwest Florida Legal Services, Inc., 

Pensacola, and Jennifer Barbookles, Tampa, for Appellant.

Sarah J. Rumph, Children's Legal Services, Tallahassee, for 

Appellee.

David P. Krupski, Guardian ad Litem Program, Sanford, for 

Guardian ad Litem Program.
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND
EXCHANGE COMMISSIONWashington, D.C. 20549 FORM 8-K CURRENT REPORT
Pursuant to
Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 Date of Report (Date of earliest
event reported): July 1, 2011 NATIONWIDE HEALTH PROPERTIES,
LLC(Exact name of registrant as
specified in its charter) Delaware
  
  1-9028
  
  95-3997619(State or other Jurisdiction of Incorporation)
  
  (Commission File Number)
  
  (IRS Employer Identification No.) 10350 Ormsby Park Place,
Suite 300
Louisville, Kentucky
  
  40223(Address of Principal Executive Offices)
  
  (Zip Code) Registrant’s telephone number,
including area code: (502) 357-9000 Nationwide Health
Properties, Inc.
610 Newport Center Drive, Suite 1150
Newport Beach,
California 92660(Former name or former address if changed since last report.) Check the appropriate box below if the
Form 8-K filing is intended to simultaneously satisfy the filing obligation of
the registrant under any of the following provisions: o Written
communications pursuant to Rule 425 under the Securities Act (17 CFR
230.425)o Soliciting material pursuant
to Rule 14a-12 under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.14a-12)o Pre-commencement communications pursuant to Rule
14d-2(b) under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.14d-2(b))o Pre-commencement communications pursuant to Rule
13e-4(c) under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.13e-4(c))
  1




---



##### 



Item 5.07. Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders.
   Proposal to Adopt the Merger Agreement
 For
    
    Against
    
    Abstain
    
    Broker Non-Votes107,272,510
    
    455,939
    
    730,872
    
    
 Item 8.01. Other Events.




---



##### 



SIGNATURES
  NATIONWIDE HEALTH PROPERTIES, LLCBy:
    /s/ Kristen M. BensonKristen M. BensonVice President and Secretary
### **CHAPTER 6—FOREIGN DIPLOMATIC AND CONSULAR OFFICERS**

Sec.
251 to 254. Repealed.
254a.
Definitions.
254b.
Privileges and immunities of mission of nonparty to Vienna Convention.
254c.
Extension of more favorable or less favorable treatment than provided under Vienna Convention; authority of President.
254c–1.
Policy toward certain agents of foreign governments.
254c–2.
Repealed.
254d.
Dismissal on motion of action against individual entitled to immunity.
254e.
Liability insurance for members of mission.
255 to 255b. Repealed or Omitted.
256.
Jurisdiction of consular officers in disputes between seamen.
257.
Arrest of seamen; procedure generally.
258.
Commitment and discharge.
258a.
Enforcement of awards of foreign consuls.
259.
Repealed.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY

 398.48

 399.05

 399.04

 398.95

 398.87

 398.80

 398.93

 398.96

 399.54

 399.54

 399.46

 399.10

 398.72

 398.62

 398.53

 398.45

 398.35

 398.25

 398.15

 398.04

 397.94

 398.23

 399.28

 400.22

 401.26

 402.41

 403.55

 404.82

 405.92

 406.98

 408.21

 510,872

 515,372

 515,293

 514,582

 513,949

 513,397

 514,423

 514,661

 519,252

 519,252

 518,618

 515,767

 512,765

 511,976

 511,266

 510,636

 509,848

 509,060

 508,274

 507,409

 506,623

 508,903

 517,192

 524,655

 532,958

 542,195

 551,411

 561,746

 570,755

 579,487

 589,681

 1,848

 5,411

 0

 0

 0

 448

 1,516

 1,102

 5,263

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 5,406

 3,576

 5,326

 5,304

 7,868

 5,179

 7,780

 5,162

 5,140

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

SAN LUIS RESERVOIR FEDERAL December 13, 2016

DAILY OPERATIONS

OCTOBER 2016 RUN DATE:

FEDERAL

CHANGE CHANGE

PACHECO

PUMP

TOTALS 79,754 0 17,837 85,029

FEDERAL

PUMP ADJ

FEDERAL

GEN

 945

 4,500

-79

-711

-633

-552

 1,026

 238

 4,591

 0

-634

-2,851

-3,002

-789

-710

-630

-788

-788

-786

-865

-786

 2,280

 8,289

 7,463

 8,303

 9,237

 9,216

 10,335

 9,009

 8,732

 10,194

 467

 452

 480

 457

 410

 298

 421

 435

 425

 436

 435

 556

 658

 652

 649

 589

 614

 630

 659

 668

 669

 683

 681

 683

 687

 677

 675

 669

 668

 654

 700

1,183

4,715

1,570

1,299

-510

-170

1,030

449

4,619

1,260

975

-128

791

1,786

1,824

2,393

3,308

3,299

3,284

3,243

3,069

2,989

4,471

2,411

4,568

4,209

6,845

4,744

6,751

4,054

4,698

ELEV STORAGE

 66,329

 72,332

 77,047

 78,617

 79,916

 79,406

 79,236

 80,266

 80,715

 85,334

 86,594

 87,569

 87,441

 88,232

 90,018

 91,842

 94,235

 97,543

 100,842

 104,126

 107,369

 110,438

 113,427

 117,898

 120,309

 124,877

 129,086

 135,931

 140,675

 147,426

 151,480

 156,178

FEDERAL

STORAGE

COMMENTS : 

VALUES IN ACRE-FEET

 71,149

0

0

1,870

1,870

0

0

0

0

0

1,500

1,500

450

1,500

2,500

2,500

3,000

4,000

4,000

4,000

4,000

4,000

4,000

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

40,690
#### NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD, Petitioner, v. CONCRETE HAULERS, Inc., and Wamix, Inc., Respondents.

No. 14824.

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.

Oct. 16, 1954.

A. Norman Somers, Asst. Gen., Counsel, N. L. R. B., David P. Findling, Assoc. Gen. Counsel, N. L. R. B., Elizabeth W. Weston, Atty., N. L. R. B., Washington, D. C., George J. Bott, General Counsel, Frederick U. Reel, John Francis Lawless, Attorneys, N. L. R. B., Washington, D. C., for petitioner.

Stanley E. Neely, Eugene M. Locke and Locke, Locke & Purnell, Dallas, Tex., for respondents.

Before HUTCHESON, Chief Judge, and HOLMES and BORAH, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

It is ordered that the motion of respondents to modify the injunctive decree heretofore entered by this court be, and the same hereby is, denied, 212 F.2d 477.
### IN THE

TENTH COURT OF APPEALS

No. 10

- 16

- 00137

- CR

WILL STEINMANN

, Appellant

v.

THE STATE OF TEXAS

, Appellee

From the 13th District Court

Navarro County, Texas

Trial Court No. D35282

- CR

ORDER

The Court received appellant’s brief in hard copy form only on October 19, 2016.

The cover of the brief contained the statement, “BRIEF IS SEALED BY ORDER OF THE

COURT.” This Court was unable to find any order by any court ordering the sealing of

appellant’s brief. This Court did not issue a sealing order. There was no written trial

court sealing order contained in the clerk’s re cord. Further, after a limited review of the

ten volume reporter’s record

, the Court was unable to locate any verbal order of the trial

court sealing appellant’s brief. However, when the Court requested to be directed to theSteinmann v. State Page 2

sealing order, a brief was el ectronically filed on October 31, 2016; but it was not filed

under seal.

Because the brief has been filed, there is no need to grant a motion for extension of

time to file it. Accordingly, appellant’s motion for extension of time to file appellant’s

brief dismissed as moot.

PER CURIAM

Before Chief Justice Gray,

Justice Davis, and

Justice Scoggins

Motion dismissed as moot

Order issued and filed November 16 , 2016
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from Angeles
Income Properties Ltd. V 1996 Year-End 10-KSB and is qualified in its entirety
by reference to such 10-KSB filing.
</LEGEND>
<CIK> 0000792181
<NAME> ANGELES INCOME PROPERTIES LTD. V
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1996
<CASH>                                             135
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        7
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0<F1>
<PP&E>                                           3,243
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   3,443
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0<F1>
<BONDS>                                          4,812
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                     (3,284)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     3,443
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                      0
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                         0
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
<FN>
<F1>Registrant has an unclassified balance sheet.
</FN>
        

</TABLE>
§ 222.43 How the one-half support determination is made. ( a ) *Amount of contributions.* The employee provides one-half support to a person if the employee makes regular contributions to that person's support, and the amount of the contributions is equal to or in excess of one-half of the person's ordinary and necessary living expenses. Ordinary and necessary living expenses are the costs for food, clothing, housing, routine medical care, and similar necessities. A contribution may be in cash, goods, or services (see § 222.42 of this part). For example, an employee pays rent and utilities amounting to $6,000 per year on an apartment in which his mother resides. In addition, the employee's mother receives $3,600 per year in social security benefits which she uses to pay for her food, clothing and medical care. The mother's total necessary living expenses are $9,600 ($6,000 + $3,600). Since the employee contributes $6,000 toward these expenses, he is contributing in excess of one-half of his mother's support.
( b ) *Reasonable period of time.* The employee is not providing at least one-half of a person's support unless the employee has made contributions for a reasonable period of time. Ordinarily, the Board will consider a reasonable period of time to be the 12-month period immediately preceding the time when the one-half support requirement must be satisfied. However, if the employee provided one-half or more of the person's support for at least 3 months of the 12-month period, and was forced to stop or reduce contributions because of circumstances beyond his or her control, such as illness or unemployment, and no one else took over responsibility for providing at least one-half of the person's support on a permanent basis, three months shall be considered a reasonable period of time.
### SUBCHAPTER XII–A—INTER-AMERICAN INVESTMENT CORPORATION
#### § 30.703 What are the time limitations on OWCP's payment of bills?

OWCP will pay providers and reimburse employees promptly for all bills received on an approved form and in a timely manner. However, no bill will be paid for expenses incurred if the bill is submitted more than one year beyond the end of the calendar year in which the expense was incurred or the service or supply was provided, or more than one year beyond the end of the calendar year in which the claim was first accepted as compensable by OWCP, whichever is later.
§ 404.1209 Mandatorily excluded services. Some services are mandatorily excluded from coverage under a State's agreement. They are: ( a ) Services of employees who are hired to relieve them from unemployment;
( b ) Services performed in an institution by a patient or inmate of the institution;
( c ) Transportation service subject to the Federal Insurance Contributions Act;
( d ) Certain emergency services in case of fire, storm, snow, volcano, earthquake, flood or other similar emergency; and
( e ) Services other than agricultural labor or student services which would be excluded from coverage if performed for a private employer.
( f ) Services covered under section 210(a)(7)(F) of the Act. (See § 404.1200(b).)
[53 FR 32976, Aug. 29, 1988, as amended at 57 FR 59911, Dec. 17, 1992]
### **CHAPTER 20A—MUTUAL DEFENSE ASSISTANCE CONTROL PROGRAM**
Editorial Note on Part 28
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 28 appear by T.D. ATF-477, 67 FR 18087 through 18090, Apr. 15, 2002.

§ 28.131 Application for return of wines withdrawn without payment of tax. Where a proprietor of a bonded wine cellar desires to return wines to his bonded wine cellar as provided in § 28.130, he shall submit a written application, in duplicate, to the appropriate TTB officer, for approval of the return of the wines. The application shall show. ( a ) Name, address, and registry number of the bonded wine cellar.
( b ) Name and address of the person who withdrew the wines.
( c ) Serial number of the TTB Form 5100.11 and the date withdrawn.
( d ) Present location of wines to be returned.
( e ) Kind of wines to be returned.
( f ) Number, kind, and serial numbers of the containers to be returned. In the case of bottled wines, the number and size of the bottles in each case.
( g ) Total quantity in wine gallons for each separate tax class of wines to be returned.
( h ) Reason for return of the wines.
The application shall be executed under the penalties of perjury. On approval of the application the appropriate TTB officer shall return both copies to the proprietor, who, in turn, shall deliver them to the exporter. (72 Stat. 1380; 26 U.S.C. 5362)
[25 FR 5734, June 23, 1960. Redesignated at 40 FR 16835, Apr. 15, 1975, and amended by T.D. ATF-62, 44 FR 71724, Dec. 11, 1979; T.D. TTB-8, 69 FR 3833, Jan. 27, 2004; T.D. TTB-146, 82 FR 1137, Jan. 4, 2017]
Exhibit 99.10









CONSENT OF  P. FORWARD





I hereby consent to the use of my name in connection with the following documents, which are being filed as exhibits to and incorporated by reference into the registration statement on Form 40-F of Silver Wheaton Corp. (the Company) being filed with the United States Securities and Exchange Commission:



1.

Information regarding the resource and reserve estimates of the Stratoni Mine; and



2.

The annual information form of the Company dated March 28, 2008, which includes reference to my name in connection with information relating to the Stratoni Mine  and the properties described therein.







Date: March 28, 2008

| |  |                                                                                                                                                
| |  | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| |  | /s/ Patrick Forward
__________________________________
Name: Patrick Forward
Title: General Manager, Exploration of
European Goldfields Limited
(No. 74-CC-379

#### Central Illinois Electric Co., Claimant, *vs.*State of Illinois, Department of Conservation, Respondent.

*Opinion filed March 25, 1974.*

Central Illinois Electric Co., Claimant, pro se.

William J. Scott, Attorney General; Howard W. Feldman, Assistant Attorney General, for Respondent.

Per Curiam.
### SUBCHAPTER X—THE INSTITUTE OF INTER-AMERICAN AFFAIRS