alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<CIK> 0000732718
<NAME> U S WEST, INC.
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000,000
       
<S>                             <C>                     <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1995             DEC-31-1995
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1995             SEP-30-1995
<CASH>                                             108                     108
<SECURITIES>                                         0                       0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    1,932                   1,932
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0                       0
<INVENTORY>                                        248                     248
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 2,937                   2,937
<PP&E>                                          32,278                  32,278
<DEPRECIATION>                                  17,936                  17,936
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  24,761                  24,761
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            6,936                   6,936
<BONDS>                                          5,144                   5,144
<COMMON>                                         8,161                   8,161
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                              651                     651
<PREFERRED>                                          0                       0
<OTHER-SE>                                       (397)                   (397)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    24,761                  24,761
<SALES>                                          2,964                   8,686
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 2,964                   8,686
<CGS>                                                0                       0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0                       0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 2,275                   6,668
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0                       0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 137                     404
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    538                   1,590
<INCOME-TAX>                                       213                     617
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                325                     973
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                    (9)                     (9)
<CHANGES>                                            0                       0
<NET-INCOME>                                       316                     964
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .67                    2.04
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .66                    2.03
        

</TABLE>
```

[Congressional Bills 114th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 370 Introduced in House (IH)]

114th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 370

  To repeal the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act and health 
care-related provisions in the Health Care and Education Reconciliation 
                              Act of 2010.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            January 14, 2015

 Mr. Fleming introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
Committee on Energy and Commerce, and in addition to the Committees on 
  Education and the Workforce, Ways and Means, the Judiciary, Natural 
Resources, Rules, House Administration, Appropriations, and the Budget, 
for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case 
for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of 
                        the committee concerned

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To repeal the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act and health 
care-related provisions in the Health Care and Education Reconciliation 
                              Act of 2010.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. REPEAL OF PPACA AND HEALTH CARE-RELATED PROVISIONS IN THE 
              HEALTH CARE AND EDUCATION RECONCILIATION ACT OF 2010.

    (a) PPACA.--Effective as of the enactment of the Patient Protection 
and Affordable Care Act (Public Law 111-148), such Act is repealed, and 
the provisions of law amended or repealed by such Act are restored or 
revived as if such Act had not been enacted.
    (b) Health Care-Related Provisions in the Health Care and Education 
Reconciliation Act of 2010.--Effective as of the enactment of the 
Health Care and Education Reconciliation Act of 2010 (Public Law 111-
152), title I and subtitle B of title II of such Act are repealed, and 
the provisions of law amended or repealed by such title or subtitle, 
respectively, are restored or revived as if such title and subtitle had 
not been enacted.

SEC. 2. BUDGETARY EFFECTS OF THIS ACT.

    The budgetary effects of this Act, for the purpose of complying 
with the Statutory Pay-As-You-Go Act of 2010, shall be determined by 
reference to the latest statement titled ``Budgetary Effects of PAYGO 
Legislation'' for this Act, submitted for printing in the Congressional 
Record by the Chairman of the Committee on the Budget of the House of 
Representatives, as long as such statement has been submitted prior to 
the vote on passage of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
### §850. Information for sentencing

Except as otherwise provided in this subchapter or section 242a(a) 1 of title 42, no limitation shall be placed on the information concerning the background, character, and conduct of a person convicted of an offense which a court of the United States may receive and consider for the purpose of imposing an appropriate sentence under this subchapter or subchapter II.

(Pub. L. 91–513, title II, §410, Oct. 27, 1970, 84 Stat. 1269.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

Section 242a of title 42, referred to in text, was repealed by Pub. L. 106–310, div. B, title XXXII, §3201(b)(1), Oct. 17, 2000, 114 Stat. 1190.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date

Section effective on first day of seventh calendar month that begins after Oct. 26, 1970, see section 704 of Pub. L. 91–513, set out as a note under section 801 of this title.

1 See References in Text note below.
# C_2012071EN.01000601.xml

| 9.3.2012 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 71/6 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

9.3.2012

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 71/6

---

Notice for the attention of the persons to whom restrictive measures provided for in Council Decision 2010/656/CFSP and in Council Regulation (EC) No 560/2005 concerning restrictive measures against certain persons and entities in Côte d'Ivoire apply

2012/C 71/04

THE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION,

The following information is brought to the attention of the persons who appear in Annex II to Council Decision 2010/656/CFSP (1), as implemented by Council Implementing Decision 2012/144/CFSP (2), and in Annex IA to Council Regulation (EC) No 560/2005 (3), as implemented by Council Implementing Regulation (EU) No 193/2012 (4) imposing certain restrictive measures directed against certain persons and entities in Côte d'Ivoire.

1

2

3

4

The Council of the European Union has determined that the persons that appear in the abovementioned Annexes should continue to be included in the list of persons subject to restrictive measures provided for in Decision 2010/656/CFSP and in Regulation (EC) No 560/2005.

The attention of the persons concerned is drawn to the possibility of making an application to the competent authorities of the relevant Member State(s) as indicated on the websites in Annex II to Regulation (EC) No 560/2005, in order to obtain an authorisation to use frozen funds for basic needs or specific payments (cf. Article 3 of the Regulation).

The persons concerned may submit a request to the Council, together with supporting documentation, that the decision to include them on the abovementioned lists should be reconsidered, to the following address:

| Council of the European Union |
| --- |
| General Secretariat |
| DG K Coordination Unit |
| Rue de la Loi/Wetstraat 175 |
| 1048 Bruxelles/Brussel |
| BELGIQUE/BELGIË |

Council of the European Union

General Secretariat

DG K Coordination Unit

Rue de la Loi/Wetstraat 175

1048 Bruxelles/Brussel

BELGIQUE/BELGIË

The attention of the persons concerned is also drawn to the possibility of challenging the Council's decision before the General Court of the European Union, in accordance with the conditions laid down in Article 275, second paragraph, and Article 263, fourth and sixth paragraphs, of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union.

---

(1)  OJ L 285, 30.10.2010, p. 28.

1

(2)  OJ L 71, 9.3.2012, p. 50.

2

(3)  OJ L 95, 14.4.2005, p. 1.

3

(4)  OJ L 71, 9.3.2012, p. 5.

4

---
[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 76 (Wednesday, April 20, 2011)]
[Notices]
[Page 22161]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2011-9499]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration


Fifty Seventh Meeting: RTCA Special Committee 135, Environmental 
Conditions and Test Procedures for Airborne Equipment

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), Department of 
Transportation (DOT).

ACTION: Notice of Joint RTCA Special Committee 135: Environmental 
Conditions and Test Procedures for Airborne Equipment.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The FAA is issuing this notice to advise the public of a 
meeting of RTCA Special Committee 135: Environmental Conditions and 
Test Procedures for Airborne Equipment.

DATES: The meeting will be held May 11-12, 2011 from 9 a.m.-5 p.m.

ADDRESSES: The meeting will be held at Embry-Riddle University, 
Building 58, Room 106, Prescott, AZ 86301-3720.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: (1) RTCA Secretariat, 1828 L Street, 
NW., Suite 805, Washington, DC 20036; telephone (202) 833-9339; fax 
(202) 833-9434; Web site http://www.rtca.org.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Pursuant to section 10(a)(2) of the Federal 
Advisory Committee Act (Pub. L. 92-463, 5 U.S.C., Appendix 2), notice 
is hereby given for a RTCA Special Committee 135: Environmental 
Conditions and Test Procedures for Airborne Equipment.
    The agenda will include:

Tuesday-Wednesday, May 11-12, 2011

<bullet> 9 a.m.-5 p.m.
    <bullet> Chairmen's Opening Remarks, Introductions.
    <bullet> Approval of Summary from Fifty-Sixth Meeting (RTCA Paper 
No. 224-110/SC 135-683).
    <bullet> Review Approved Revised SC135 TOR (Terms of Reference)--
Environmental Conditions and Test Procedures for Airborne Equipment--
(RTCA Paper No. 067-11/SCPMC887).
    <bullet> Review Proposal of User's Guides.
    <bullet> Review Working Group Activities.
    <bullet> Review Revised Terms of Reference.
    <bullet> New or unfinished business.
    <bullet> Establish Date for Next SC-135 Meeting.
    <bullet> Adjourn.

    Attendance is open to the interested public but limited to space 
availability. With the approval of the chairmen, members of the public 
may present oral statements at the meeting. Persons wishing to present 
statements or obtain information should contact the person listed in 
the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section. Members of the public may 
present a written statement to the committee at any time.

    Issued in Washington, DC, April 14, 2011.
Robert L. Bostiga,
RTCA Advisory Committee.
[FR Doc. 2011-9499 Filed 4-19-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-P
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Benjamin Rockower, Appellant.

*782Close, P. J., Hagarty, Johnston, Taylor and Lewis, JJ., concur.
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 31.1

     CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER PURSUANT TO SECTION 302(a) OF
                         THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, John R. Hinson, certify that:

            1.   I have reviewed this report on Form 10-K/A of Cardiac Science
      Corporation; and

            2.   Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue
      statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to
      make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such
      statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by
      this report.

            Date: April 28, 2006

                                                   /s/     JOHN R. HINSON
                                                --------------------------------
                                                John R. Hinson
                                                Chief Executive Officer
# C_2012278EN.01000401.xml

| 14.9.2012 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 278/4 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

14.9.2012

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 278/4

---

DECISION TO CLOSE THE FORMAL INVESTIGATION PROCEDURE AFTER WITHDRAWAL BY MEMBER STATE

State aid — Malta

(Articles 107 to 109 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union)

Commission notice pursuant to Article 108(2) of the TFEU — Withdrawal of notification

State aid SA.29427 (C 32/10 (ex N 520/09)) — Environmental Project for Delimara Power Station

(Text with EEA relevance)

2012/C 278/03

The Commission has decided to close the formal investigation procedure under Article 108(2) of the TFEU, initiated on 17 November 2010 (1) in respect of the measure referred to above, recording that Malta has withdrawn its notification on 1 December 2011 and will not pursue this aid project further.

1

---

(1)  OJ C 52, 18.2.2011, p. 3.

1

---
```

[Congressional Bills 114th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 4004 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

114th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 4004

 To amend the Higher Education Act of 1965 to repeal the suspension of 
  eligibility for grants, loans, and work assistance for drug-related 
                               offenses.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           November 16, 2015

  Ms. Bass (for herself, Mr. Danny K. Davis of Illinois, Mr. Scott of 
Virginia, and Mr. Young of Alaska) introduced the following bill; which 
      was referred to the Committee on Education and the Workforce

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To amend the Higher Education Act of 1965 to repeal the suspension of 
  eligibility for grants, loans, and work assistance for drug-related 
                               offenses.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Stopping Unfair Collateral 
Consequences from Ending Student Success Act'' or ``SUCCESS Act''.

SEC. 2. REPEAL OF SUSPENSION OF ELIGIBILITY UNDER THE HIGHER EDUCATION 
              ACT OF 1965 FOR GRANTS, LOANS, AND WORK ASSISTANCE FOR 
              DRUG-RELATED OFFENSES.

    (a) Repeal.--Subsection (r) of section 484 of the Higher Education 
Act of 1965 (20 U.S.C. 1091(r)) is repealed.
    (b) Conforming Amendments.--The Higher Education Act of 1965 is 
amended--
            (1) in section 428(b)(3) (20 U.S.C. 1078(b)(3))--
                    (A) in subparagraph (C), by striking ``485(l)'' and 
                inserting ``485(k)''; and
                    (B) in subparagraph (D), by striking ``485(l)'' and 
                inserting ``485(k)'';
            (2) in section 435(d)(5) (20 U.S.C. 1085(d)(5))--
                    (A) in subparagraph (E), by striking ``485(l)'' and 
                inserting ``485(k)''; and
                    (B) in subparagraph (F), by striking ``485(l)'' and 
                inserting ``485(k)'';
            (3) in section 484 (20 U.S.C. 1091), by redesignating 
        subsections (s) and (t) as subsections (r) and (s), 
        respectively; and
            (4) in section 485 (20 U.S.C. 1092)--
                    (A) by striking subsection (k); and
                    (B) by redesignating subsections (l) and (m) as 
                subsections (k) and (l), respectively.
                                 <all>
```
#### George Floyd Vingut and Others, as Trustees, etc., Respondents, *v.*Henry B. Sire, Appellant.

First Department,

July 10, 1914.

Contempt — process—personal service of order to show cause — general appearance by attorney.

A defendant cannot be adjudged guilty of contempt of court in failing to appear and submit to an examination concerning his property where the order to show cause was not served upon him personally but was served upon an attorney who represented him upon an appeal from a prior order.

*It seems,*the appearance of the attorney upon the appeal from the order extending the receivership was not a general appearance.

Appeal by the defendant, Henry B. Sire, from an order of the Supreme Court, made at the New York Special Term and entered in the office of the clerk of the county of New York, adjudging defendant guilty of contempt of court in failing to appear and to submit to an examination in proceedings supple*530mentary to execution, and. fining him therefor the sum of $250.

*Franklin Bien,*for the appellant.

*Sidney L. Josephthal,*for the respondents.

McLaughlin, J.:

The defendant appeals from an order adjudging him guilty of contempt of court in failing to appear and submit to an examination concerning his property as he had been directed to do by a prior order of the court and imposing a fine upon him therefor of $250. '

The order to show cause why he should not be adjudged guilty of contempt and punished therefor was never personally served upon the defendant. It was, however, served upon the attorney who represents him upon this appeal. This attorney had never put in a general appearance in the proceeding. It appears that an order had been made in the proceeding extending the receivership and this attorney had, on behalf of the defendant, taken an appeal therefrom. It is claimed by the respondents that the notice of appeal thus signed by the attorney was equivalent to a general appearance and for that reason the service upon him of the order to show cause was sufficient.

I do not think it was equivalent to a general appearance. It was an appearance simply for the purpose of the appeal, but even though it be considered a general appearance in the proceeding, the defendant could not be punished for contempt by the service of an order to show cause why he should not be adjudged guilty of contempt by service upon the attorney. Before he could be so adjudged the order to show cause had to be personally served upon him. (Code Civ. Proc. § 2451.)

The order appealed from, therefore, is reversed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and the motion denied, with ten dollars costs.

Ingraham, P. J.,' Scott, Dowling and Hotchkiss, JJ., concurred.

Order reversed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and motion denied, with ten dollars costs.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

DAY HIGH

 529

 495

 503

 534

 547

 549

 575

 570

 583

 578

 583

 623

 682

 678

 667

 700

 719

 731

 766

 765

 743

 693

 696

 662

 715

 723

 723

 734

 794

 794

 350

 376

 395

 402

 400

 411

 405

 422

 427

 406

 418

 427

 441

 441

 456

 441

 472

 470

 471

 525

 509

 490

 472

 485

 485

 480

 475

 474

 486

 496

 428

 431

 450

 458

 467

 470

 472

 474

 483

 491

 493

 511

 525

 534

 551

 557

 563

 563

 576

 583

 572

 558

 568

 555

 557

 551

 547

 544

 583

 614

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

NOVEMBER 2000 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: December 11, 2000

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

DELTA MENDOTA CANAL AT CHECK 13 (O'NEILL)
[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 74 (Monday, April 18, 2011)]
[Notices]
[Page 21712]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2011-9273]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE

Department of the Navy


Notice of Intent To Grant a Partially Exclusive Patent License; 
PopTest Cortisol LLC

AGENCY: Department of the Navy, DoD.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Department of the Navy hereby gives notice of its intent 
to grant to PopTest Cortisol LLC, a revocable, nonassignable, partially 
exclusive license to practice worldwide the Government owned inventions 
described in U.S. Patent Application Serial No. 12/163,412 entitled 
``Fluorescence polarization instruments and methods for detection of 
exposure to biological materials by fluorescence polarization 
immunoassay of saliva, oral or bodily fluids''; U.S. Patent Application 
Serial No. 11/328,486, entitled ``Method for the detection of stress 
biomarkers including cortisol by fluorescence polarization''; and U.S. 
Patent Application Serial No. 11/726,203 entitled ``Method for the 
detection of target molecules by fluorescence polarization using 
peptide mimics'' in the field of ``Development of a saliva based 
cortisol rapid response detection devices utilizing fluorescence 
polarization''

DATES: Anyone wishing to object to the grant of this license must file 
written objections along with supporting evidence, if any, not later 
than May 3, 2011.

ADDRESSES: Written objections are to be filed with the Office of 
Technology Transfer, Naval Medical Research Center, 503 Robert Grant 
Ave., Silver Spring, MD 20910-7500.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Roxanne Charles, Office of Legal and 
Technology Services, Naval Medical Research Center, 503 Robert Grant 
Ave., Silver Spring, MD 20910-7500, telephone 301-319-9846.

    Dated: April 11, 2011.
D.J. Werner,
Lieutenant Commander, Judge Advocate General's Corps, U.S. Navy, 
Federal Register Liaison Officer.
[FR Doc. 2011-9273 Filed 4-15-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3810-FF-P
#### Mae Sackman, Respondent, v. Arthur J. Brennan, Appellant.

Present—Martin, P. J., Townley, Dore, Cohn and Callahan, JJ.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY HIGH

 22,699

 23,074

 24,051

 25,484

 25,455

 24,847

 26,068

 26,750

 25,228

 26,490

 24,778

 25,178

 25,917

 23,199

 24,204

 23,797

 25,707

 25,537

 24,168

 24,424

 24,780

 25,347

 24,407

 29,873

 22,343

 17,129

 12,792

 10,835

 11,769

 14,390

 13,531

 12,486

 14,897

 15,920

 17,031

 17,776

 17,862

 18,245

 17,928

 15,242

 12,582

 16,590

 14,735

 14,772

 15,160

 15,056

 15,412

 17,091

 15,865

 16,848

 16,981

 16,902

 17,113

 16,755

 15,758

 16,314

 10,866

 6,291

 4,387

 4,108

 4,993

 5,390

 17,899

 19,949

 20,395

 21,056

 21,806

 22,012

 22,179

 22,199

 21,016

 21,051

 20,986

 19,838

 20,724

 20,361

 19,723

 20,492

 21,478

 21,379

 20,680

 21,165

 20,893

 21,603

 20,920

 23,163

 19,717

 14,395

 10,134

 8,638

 8,434

 9,498

 9,825

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

OCTOBER 2021 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: January 27, 2022

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

PORT CHICAGO TOP IN SUISUN BAY