alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
A-AA+Skip to content

                  - Home
                  - Compendium Statistics
                  - Event
                  - Archives
                  - Glossary
                  - Help
                  - Contact
                  - Research on Disability

Annual Disability Statistics Compendium

              - Home /
              - Compendium Statistics /
              - Employment /
              - 2.8 Civilians with Independent Living Disabilities Ages 18-64 Years Living in the Community for the U.S.

## Table 2.8: Employment—Civilians with Independent Living Disabilities Ages 18 to 64 Years Living in the Community for the United States and States: 2012

----

----

 

----

#### 2012 Disability Compendium

                        - Home
                        - Compendium Statistics                           - Population and Prevelance
                          - Employment
                          - Time Trend Population Statistics
                          - Poverty
                          - Earnings
                          - Veterans
                          - Health Insurance Coverage
                          - Health
                          - Social Security Administration Programs
                          - Medicaid and Medicare
                          - Special Education
                          - Vocational Rehabilitation
                          - Federal Government Spending and Employment
                          - International Disability Statistics
                          - Population Statistics: Disability Type
                        - Event
                        - Archives                           - 2012 Compendium Statistics
                        - Glossary
                        - Help
                        - Contact
                        - Research on Disability

#### Funding for this project is made possible by:

 The Research and Training Center on Disability Statistics and Demographics (StatsRRTC), which is funded by the U.S. Department of Education, National Institute for Disability and Rehabilitation Research, under cooperative agreements H133B080012.

#### Stay Connected

**Institute on Disability**10 West Edge Drive, Suite 101Durham, NH 03824603.862.4320 | relay: 711 | [email protected]www.iod.unh.edu

© 2013. Institute on Disability.University of New Hampshire.
EXHIBIT 32

Certification of CEO and CFO Pursuant to

18 U.S.C. Section 1350,

As Adopted Pursuant to

Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Volcom, Inc. (the Company) for the year ended
December 31, 2008 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), Richard R. Woolcott, as Chief Executive Officer of the Company, and Douglas P. Collier, as Chief Financial Officer of the
Company, each hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to his knowledge, that:



|(i) | the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
|--- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|(ii) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
|---- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                                                  
|--------------------------------------------------
|/s/    Richard R.
Woolcott                        
|Richard R. Woolcott                               
|Chairman and Chief Executive                      
|(Principal Executive Officer)                     
|Dated: March 16, 2009                             
|                                                  
|/s/    Douglas P. Collier                         
|Douglas P. Collier                                
|Executive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer,
|Secretary and Treasurer                           
|(Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)      
|Dated: March 16, 2009                             

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Volcom, Inc. and
will be retained by Volcom, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

This certification is being furnished
solely to accompany the Report pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, and is not being filed for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and is not to be incorporated by reference into any filing of the
Company, whether made before or after the date hereof, regardless of any general incorporation language in such filing.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY HIGH

 13,315

 12,170

 11,356

 9,700

 13,003

 14,138

 14,139

 13,770

 13,453

 14,052

 14,181

 12,218

 12,056

 13,426

 14,973

 16,345

 17,003

 15,828

 15,958

 15,036

 16,132

 12,145

 14,913

 14,689

 14,305

 11,602

 8,210

 6,966

 7,650

 8,211

 7,585

 5,905

 4,209

 3,917

 3,453

 4,256

 4,760

 4,709

 4,702

 4,674

 4,628

 5,065

 5,081

 4,410

 4,651

 5,788

 6,385

 8,332

 7,487

 6,284

 5,623

 5,107

 5,171

 4,846

 4,786

 5,295

 4,184

 3,214

 2,503

 2,214

 2,220

 2,201

 9,259

 7,846

 6,800

 6,136

 7,727

 8,636

 8,835

 8,581

 8,507

 9,071

 9,379

 8,850

 8,508

 9,743

 10,328

 11,556

 11,961

 11,083

 10,399

 9,730

 9,502

 8,886

 9,144

 9,253

 8,739

 7,157

 5,664

 4,633

 4,355

 4,294

 4,311

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

DECEMBER 2018 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: January 3, 2019

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

PITTSBURG TOP ON THE SACRAMENTO RIVER
§ 355.18 Authority of the ALJ. ( a ) The ALJ shall conduct a fair and impartial hearing, avoid delay, maintain order, and assure that a record of the proceeding is made.
( b ) The ALJ has the authority to— ( 1 ) Set and change the date, time, and place of the hearing upon reasonable notice to the parties;
( 2 ) Continue or recess the hearing in whole or in part for a reasonable period of time;
( 3 ) Hold conferences to identify or simplify the issues, or to consider other matters that may aid in the expeditious disposition of the proceeding;
( 4 ) Administer oaths and affirmations;
( 5 ) Issue subpoenas requiring the attendance of witnesses and the production of documents at depositions or at hearings;
( 6 ) Rule on motions and other procedural matters;
( 7 ) Regulate the scope and timing of discovery;
( 8 ) Regulate the course of the hearing and the conduct of representatives and parties;
( 9 ) Examine witnesses;
( 10 ) Receive, rule on, exclude, or limit evidence;
( 11 ) Upon motion of a party, take official notice of facts;
( 12 ) Upon motion of a party, decide cases, in whole or in part, by summary judgment where there is no disputed issue of material fact;
( 13 ) Conduct any conference, argument, or hearing on motions in person or by telephone; and
( 14 ) Exercise such other authority as is necessary to carry out the responsibilities of the ALJ under this part.
( c ) The ALJ does not have the authority to decide upon the validity of Federal statutes or regulations.
#### § 220.5 Definitions as used in this part.

*Act* means the Railroad Retirement Act of 1974.

*Application* refers only to a form described in part 217 of this chapter.

*Board* means the Railroad Retirement Board.

*Claimant* means the person for whom an application for an annuity, period of disability or Medicare coverage is filed.

*Eligible* means that a person would meet all the requirements for payment of an annuity but has not yet applied.

*Employee* is defined in part 203 of this title.

*Entitled* means that a person has applied and has proven his or her right to have the annuity, period of disability, or Medicare coverage begin.

*Medical source* refers to both a treating source and a source of record.

*Review physician* means a medical doctor either employed by or under contract to the Board who upon request reviews medical evidence and provides medical advice.

*Social security overall minimum* refers to the provision of the Railroad Retirement Act which guarantees that the total monthly annuities payable to an employee and his or her family will not be less than the total monthly amount which would be payable under the Social Security Act if the employee's railroad service were credited as employment under the Social Security Act.

*Source of record* means a hospital, clinic or other source that has provided a claimant with medical treatment or evaluation, as well as a physician or psychologist who has treated or evaluated a claimant but does not have an ongoing relationship with him or her.

*Treating source* means the claimant's own physician or psychologist who has provided the claimant with medical treatment or evaluation and who has an ongoing treatment relationship with him or her.
#### § 404.965 [Reserved]
ERNST
& YOUNG













Exhibit
15.1












CONSENT
OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM




We
consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement on Form
F-3 (No. 333-147138) of Omega Navigation Enterprises Inc. and in the related
Prospectus of our reports dated May 15, 2009, with respect to the consolidated
financial statements and the effectiveness of internal control over financial
reporting of Omega Navigation Enterprises Inc. included in this Annual Report
(Form 20-F) for the year ended December 31, 2008.




/s/
      Ernst & Young







May 15,
2009


Athens,
Greece
(No. 74-CC-309

#### Standard Oil Division, Claimant, *vs.*State of Illinois, Illinois State University, Respondent.

*Opinion filed March 8, 1974.*

Standard Oil Division, Claimant, pro se.

William J. Scott, Attorney General; Edward L. S. Arkema, Jr., Assistant Attorney General, for Respondent.

Per Curiam.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY HIGH

 19,334

 16,943

 15,245

 13,682

 13,324

 13,515

 16,368

 14,447

 12,629

 11,137

 10,834

 10,509

 9,944

 9,964

 7,573

 6,015

 5,687

 6,458

 6,702

 6,913

 8,769

 12,347

 11,580

 11,682

 11,055

 11,444

 10,040

 8,980

 8,712

 8,179

 7,303

 6,829

 8,214

 5,746

 6,092

 6,077

 5,469

 7,798

 5,348

 3,958

 2,949

 2,658

 2,214

 1,788

 1,649

 1,785

 1,173

 988

 1,109

 1,139

 1,140

 1,317

 3,072

 2,525

 2,427

 2,094

 2,082

 1,956

 1,829

 1,704

 1,624

 1,680

 14,038

 13,518

 11,253

 10,119

 9,429

 9,459

 11,130

 9,659

 7,716

 6,405

 5,674

 5,252

 4,814

 4,814

 3,840

 2,908

 2,745

 3,702

 3,290

 3,056

 3,884

 6,101

 5,861

 5,841

 5,801

 5,560

 5,080

 4,579

 4,528

 4,326

 4,285

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

DECEMBER 2019 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: January 7, 2020

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

PITTSBURG BOTTOM ON THE SACRAMENTO RIVER
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

DAY HIGH

 16,098

 15,122

 13,736

 12,470

 12,178

 12,842

 13,569

 14,473

 15,699

 15,233

 14,376

 15,521

 15,892

 16,450

 14,283

 15,147

 13,314

 15,465

 14,944

 15,752

 15,611

 13,459

 15,618

 16,272

 16,091

 14,596

 14,517

 14,859

 15,549

 13,902

 5,331

 5,582

 4,520

 5,855

 4,888

 4,770

 6,159

 5,018

 6,807

 5,024

 4,492

 5,060

 6,327

 6,792

 5,555

 5,512

 6,357

 6,879

 7,056

 4,229

 4,982

 5,364

 6,864

 6,410

 6,002

 6,021

 6,044

 4,874

 7,084

 6,240

 10,735

 9,542

 8,764

 8,684

 7,814

 8,329

 8,968

 9,501

 10,565

 9,767

 9,582

 9,268

 11,276

 10,923

 9,877

 10,016

 9,859

 10,779

 10,749

 9,723

 10,254

 9,191

 10,135

 10,955

 10,179

 10,075

 10,004

 10,141

 10,815

 10,575

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

SEPTEMBER 2020 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: October 19, 2020

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

PITTSBURG TOP ON THE SACRAMENTO RIVER
### SUBCHAPTER V–A—RADIO BROADCASTING TO CUBA

#### Repeal of Subchapter

Subchapter repealed upon transmittal of determination by President under section 6063(c)(3) of this title that democratically elected government in Cuba is in power, see section 6037(c) of this title.
#### § 404.424 Total amount of deductions where more than one deduction event occurs in a month.

If more than one of the deduction events specified in §§ 404.415, 404.417, and 404.421 occurred in any 1 month, each of which would occasion a deduction equal to the benefit for such month, only an amount equal to such benefit is deducted.
#### Gerardo Daniel SANDOVAL-VILLEGAS, Petitioner, v. Alberto R. GONZALES, Attorney General, Respondent.

No. 06-70661.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted July 17, 2006.*

Decided July 21, 2006.

Gerardo Daniel Sandoval-Villegas, Riverside, CA, pro se.

CAC-District Counsel, Esq., Office of the District Counsel Department of Homeland Security, Los Angeles, CA, Ronald E. LeFevre, Chief Counsel, Office of the District Counsel Department of Homeland Security, San Francisco, CA, Daniel E. Goldman, Esq., U.S. Department of Justice Civil Div./Office of Immigration Lit., Washington, DC, for Respondent.

Before: B. FLETCHER, HAWKINS and THOMAS, Circuit Judges.

*

 This panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. *See*Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

MEMORANDUM **

The court has received and reviewed petitioner’s response to the motion to dismiss. A review of the record demonstrates that petitioner did not provide evidence at his removal hearing or appeal before the Board of Immigration Appeals that he was statutorily eligible for cancellation of removal. *See 8*U.S.C. § 1229b(b)(l)(D); *Molinar-Estrada v. INS,*293 F.3d 1089, 1090-1091 (9th Cir.2002) (holding that because petitioner provided no evidence that his mother was a lawful permanent resident, he was not eligible for cancellation).

Respondent’s motion for summary disposition is granted because the questions raised by this petition for review are so insubstantial as not to require further argument. *See United States v. Hooton,*693 F.2d 857, 858 (9th Cir.1982) (per curiam) (stating standard). Accordingly, this petition for review is denied.

All other pending motions are denied as moot. The temporary stay of removal and *561voluntary departure confirmed by Ninth Circuit General Order 6.4(c) and *Desta v. Ashcroft,*365 F.3d 741 (9th Cir.2004), shall continue in effect until issuance of the mandate.

PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED.

**

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
1.
    
    I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Healthcare Services Group, Inc.;2.
    
    Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material
fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of
the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the
periods covered by this report;3.
    
    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information
included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition,
results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods
presented in this report;4.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and
maintaining disclosure controls and procedures ( as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e)
and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting ( as defined in Exchange Act
Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and have;
 a)
    
    designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure
that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated
subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly
during the period in which this report is being prepared;b)
    
    designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such
internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to
provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and
the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with
generally accepted accounting principles;c)
    
    evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of
the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this
report based on such evaluation; andd)
    
    disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal
control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent
fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially
affect, the registrants internal control over financial reporting; and
 5.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most
recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants
auditors and the audit committee of registrants Board of Directors.
 a)
    
    all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely
to adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and
report financial information; andb)
    
    any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal control over
financial reporting.
 Date:  April 20, 2009
    /s/ Richard W. HudsonRichard W. HudsonChief Financial Officer -33-
### §1645g. Consolidated awards

With respect to any claim under section 1645b of this title which, at the time of the award, is vested in persons other than the person by whom the original loss was sustained, the Commission shall issue a consolidated award in favor of all claimants then entitled to the award, which award shall indicate the respective interests of such claimants in the award, and all such claimants shall participate, in proportion to their indicated interests, in any payments that may be made under this subchapter in all respects as if the award had been in favor of a single person.

(Mar. 10, 1950, ch. 54, title VII, §708, as added Pub. L. 96–606, Dec. 28, 1980, 94 Stat. 3536.)
### §1391. Transfer of property and rights to Philippine Commonwealth

All the property and rights which may have been acquired in the Philippine Islands by the United States under the treaties mentioned in the first section of this Act, except such land or other property as has heretofore been designated by the President of the United States for Military and other reservations of the Government of the United States, and except such land or other property or rights or interests therein as may have been sold or otherwise disposed of in accordance with law, are granted to the government of the Commonwealth of the Philippine Islands when constituted.

(Mar. 24, 1934, ch. 84, §5, 48 Stat. 459.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

Treaties mentioned in the first section of this Act, referred to in text, were treaty of peace between the United States and Spain of December 10, 1898, and treaty between Spain and the United States concluded at Washington, Nov. 7, 1900.

The first section of this Act, referred to in text, is section 1 of act Mar. 24, 1934, which was classified to section 1231 of Title 48, Territories and Insular Possessions, and was omitted from the Code.

Since their independence, the Philippine Islands have been a republic, and are no longer designated as a "Commonwealth", referred to in text. See note below.

#### Prior Provisions

Provisions similar to those in this section were contained in act Jan. 17, 1933, ch. 11, §5, 47 Stat. 764.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Separability

Act Mar. 24, 1934, ch. 84, §16, 48 Stat. 464, provided: "If any provision of this Act [enacting this section and sections 1281a, 1393 to 1395 of this title, amending sections 1231 to 1234, 1237 to 1239, 1241 to 1243, 1245, 1247, and 1248 of Title 48, Territories and Insular Possessions] is declared unconstitutional or the applicability thereof to any person or circumstances is held invalid, the validity of the remainder of the act and the applicability of such provisions and circumstances shall not be affected thereby."

#### **Executive Documents**

#### Philippine Independence

Philippine Islands granted independence by Proc. No. 2695, which is set out as a note under section 1394 of this title.
### §1643f. Action of Commission with respect to claims

#### (a) Certification of amounts

The Commission shall certify to each individual who has filed a claim under this subchapter the amount determined by the Commission to be the loss or damage suffered by the claimant which is covered by this subchapter. The Commission shall certify to the Secretary of State such amount and the basic information underlying that amount, together with a statement of the evidence relied upon and the reasoning employed in reaching its decision.

#### (b) Limitation on amount of claims of assignees

The amount determined to be due on any claim of an assignee who acquires the same by purchase shall not exceed (or, in the case of any such acquisition subsequent to the date of the determination, shall not be deemed to have exceeded) the amount of the actual consideration paid by such assignee, or in case of successive assignments of a claim by any assignee.

(Mar. 10, 1950, ch. 54, title V, §507, as added Pub. L. 88–666, Oct. 16, 1964, 78 Stat. 1112.)
Third District Court of Appeal

State of Florida

Opinion filed March 29, 2023.

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.

________________

No. 3D21-2269

Lower Tribunal No. 19-3489

________________

Javarius Hendrix,

Appellant,

vs.

Wal-Mart Stores East, LP,

Appellee.

An Appeal from the Circuit Court for Miami-Dade County, Mark 

Blumstein, Judge.

Chad Barr Law, and Chad A. Barr (Altamonte Springs), for appellant.

Fasi & DiBello, P.A., and Frantz Destin Jr. and Darin DiBello, for 

appellee.

Before FERNANDEZ, C.J., and EMAS and SCALES, JJ. 

PER CURIAM.
2

Affirmed. See § 90.403, Fla. Stat. (2021) (“Relevant evidence is 

inadmissible if its probative value is substantially outweighed by the danger 

of unfair prejudice, confusion of issues, misleading the jury, or needless 

presentation of cumulative evidence.”); Trees v. K-Mart Corp., 467 So. 2d 

401, 403 (Fla. 4th DCA 1985) (“The determination of relevancy is within the 

discretion of the trial court. Where a trial court has weighed probative value 

against prejudicial impact before reaching its decision to admit or exclude 

evidence, an appellate court will not overturn that decision absent a clear 

abuse of discretion.”) (citation omitted); Sims v. Brown, 574 So. 2d 131, 133 

(Fla. 1991) (citing Trees with approval, observing that “[t]he weighing of 

relevance versus prejudice or confusion is best performed by the trial judge 

who is present and best able to compare the two”).