alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 114th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 3895 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

114th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 3895

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to extend for two years the 
          credit for combined heat and power system property.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            November 3, 2015

 Mr. Grayson introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                      Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to extend for two years the 
          credit for combined heat and power system property.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. EXTENSION OF CREDIT FOR COMBINED HEAT AND POWER SYSTEM 
              PROPERTY.

    (a) In General.--Section 48(c)(3)(A)(iv) of the Internal Revenue 
Code of 1986 is amended by striking ``January 1, 2017'' and inserting 
``January 1, 2019''.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendments made by this section shall 
apply to property placed in service after December 31, 2016.
                                 <all>
```
§ 401.95 Fees. ( a ) *Policy.* Where applicable, we will charge fees for copying records in accordance with the schedule set forth in this section. We may only charge fees where you request that a copy be made of the record to which you are granted access. We will not charge a fee for searching a system of records, whether the search is manual, mechanical, or electronic. Where we must copy the record in order to provide access to the record (e.g., computer printout where no screen reading is available), we will provide the copy to you without cost. Where we make a medical record available to a representative designated by you or to a physician or health professional designated by a parent or guardian under § 401.55 of this part, we will not charge a fee.
( b ) *Fee schedule.* Our Privacy Act fee schedule is as follows: ( 1 ) Copying of records susceptible to photocopying—$.10 per page.
( 2 ) Copying records not susceptible to photocopying (e.g., punch cards or magnetic tapes)—at actual cost to be determined on a case-by-case basis.
( 3 ) We will not charge if the total amount of copying does not exceed $25.
( c ) *Other fees.* We also follow §§ 402.155 through 402.165 of this chapter to determine the amount of fees, if any, we will charge for providing information under the FOIA and Privacy Act.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATIONEXTRACTED FROM THE
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS AND CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS FOUND ON
PAGES 1,2 AND 3 OF THE COMPANY'S FORM 10-Q FOR THE YEAR-TO-DATE, AND IS
QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1997
<CASH>                                           1,940
<SECURITIES>                                     1,500
<RECEIVABLES>                                    3,812
<ALLOWANCES>                                       136
<INVENTORY>                                      8,316
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                16,169
<PP&E>                                           1,281
<DEPRECIATION>                                     322
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  18,287
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            4,087
<BONDS>                                          5,231
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            50
<OTHER-SE>                                       8,800
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    18,287
<SALES>                                          5,806
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 5,806
<CGS>                                            1,978
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    1,978
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 3,434
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 250
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    144
<INCOME-TAX>                                        57
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                 87
<DISCONTINUED>                                   2,649
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     2,736
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .53
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .49
        

</TABLE>
### §§2961 to 2966. Omitted

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Sections were omitted in the general amendment of the Elementary and Secondary Education Act of 1965, Pub. L. 89–10, by Pub. L. 103–382, title I, §101, Oct. 20, 1994, 108 Stat. 3519.

Section 2961, Pub. L. 89–10, title I, §1561, as added Pub. L. 100–297, title I, §1001, Apr. 28, 1988, 102 Stat. 210, provided general authority for national programs and activities.

A prior section 2961, Pub. L. 89–10, title III, §321, as added Pub. L. 95–561, title III, §301(a), Nov. 1, 1978, 92 Stat. 2212, set out short title and statement of findings for program of arts in education, prior to repeal by Pub. L. 97–35, title V, §587(a)(1), Aug. 13, 1981, 95 Stat. 480, eff. Oct. 1, 1982.

Section 2962, Pub. L. 89–10, title I, §1562, as added Pub. L. 100–297, title I, §1001, Apr. 28, 1988, 102 Stat. 211, related to National Diffusion Network activities.

A prior section 2962, Pub. L. 89–10, title III, §322, as added Pub. L. 95–561, title III, §301(a), Nov. 1, 1978, 92 Stat. 2212; amended Pub. L. 96–88, title III, §301(a), title V, §507, Oct. 17, 1979, 93 Stat. 677, 692, authorized a program of grants and contracts for Arts in Education program, prior to repeal by Pub. L. 97–35, title V, §587(a)(1), Aug. 13, 1981, 95 Stat. 480, eff. Oct. 1, 1982.

Section 2963, Pub. L. 89–10, title I, §1563, as added Pub. L. 100–297, title I, §1001, Apr. 28, 1988, 102 Stat. 212; amended Pub. L. 102–73, title V, §501(a), July 25, 1991, 105 Stat. 355, related to inexpensive book distribution program for reading motivation.

A prior section 2963, Pub. L. 89–10, title III, §323, as added, Pub. L. 95–561, title III, §301(a), Nov. 1, 1978, 92 Stat. 2213, authorized appropriations for Arts in Education program, prior to repeal by Pub. L. 97–35, title V, §587(a)(1), Aug. 13, 1981, 95 Stat. 480, eff. Oct. 1, 1982.

Section 2964, Pub. L. 89–10, title I, §1564, as added Pub. L. 100–297, title I, §1001, Apr. 28, 1988, 102 Stat. 213, related to Arts in Education program.

Section 2965, Pub. L. 89–10, title I, §1565, as added Pub. L. 100–297, title I, §1001, Apr. 28, 1988, 102 Stat. 213; amended Pub. L. 102–62, title III, §311, June 27, 1991, 105 Stat. 313, related to law-related education program.

Section 2966, Pub. L. 89–10, title I, §1566, as added Pub. L. 100–297, title I, §1001, Apr. 28, 1988, 102 Stat. 214; amended Pub. L. 102–73, title VI, §602(a), July 25, 1991, 105 Stat. 357, related to Blue Ribbon Schools program.
### Part B—Contributions to the Fund
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY ELEVATION

 252.55

 252.67

 252.51

 252.66

 252.63

 252.55

 252.56

 252.49

 252.53

 252.51

 252.66

 252.63

 252.62

 252.48

 252.56

 252.63

 252.54

 252.63

 252.61

 252.63

 252.62

 252.67

 252.57

 252.66

 252.66

 252.54

 252.65

 252.52

 252.49

 252.55

 252.56

 3,948

 4,008

 3,928

 4,003

 3,988

 3,948

 3,953

 3,919

 3,938

 3,928

 4,003

 3,988

 3,983

 3,914

 3,953

 3,988

 3,943

 3,988

 3,978

 3,988

 3,983

 4,008

 3,958

 4,003

 4,003

 3,943

 3,998

 3,933

 3,919

 3,948

 3,953

STORAGE

-45

+60

-80

+75

-15

-40

+5

-34

+19

-10

+75

-15

-5

-69

+39

+35

-45

+45

-10

+10

-5

+25

-50

+45

+0

-60

+55

-65

-14

+29

+5

CHANGE

 367

 449

 465

 476

 426

 447

 428

 441

 442

 443

 344

 380

 412

 385

 421

 422

 407

 407

 292

 233

 275

 319

 356

 378

 244

 231

 322

 308

 342

 334

 364

 11,070

 10,998

 10,986

 10,590

 10,590

 10,434

 10,710

 10,734

 10,926

 10,350

 10,110

 9,870

 9,750

 9,714

 9,606

 9,090

 9,270

 9,030

 9,582

 10,194

 9,342

 10,170

 9,030

 8,670

 8,670

 8,550

 9,078

 8,406

 8,646

 8,898

 8,790

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

AUGUST 2008 RED BLUFF DIVERSION RESERVOIR DAILY OPERATIONS RUN DATE: September 2, 2008

IN LAKE

CANAL

 ACRE-FEET

TOTALS -40 11,560 301,854

ACRE-FEET -40 22,929 598,727

SUMMARY

RELEASE (ACRE-FEET)

TOTAL 624,758

 3,993

RELEASE

RIVER

CORNING TO SACTO

CANAL

RELEASE C.F.S.

TEHAMA

COLUSA

 57

 52

 43

 22

 47

 65

 76

 78

 59

 35

 29

 44

 50

 79

 67

 48

 49

 31

 32

 34

 41

 52

 52

 44

 31

 46

 62

 79

 60

 53

 47

 1,564

 3,102

CORNING CANAL 3,102

TEHAMA-COLUSA CANAL 22,929

TO SACTO RIVER 598,727
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

DAY HIGH

 22,158

 21,465

 23,857

 26,466

 24,587

 23,846

 23,425

 24,803

 21,409

 19,441

 19,448

 16,820

 18,836

 18,737

 21,294

 22,027

 20,520

 13,792

 11,367

 10,227

 9,628

 10,324

 10,667

 5,832

 3,779

 2,892

 1,647

 917

 11,521

 11,196

 11,380

 12,118

 12,376

 12,082

 12,126

 12,512

 11,299

 9,996

 10,097

 9,638

 9,719

 9,865

 10,489

 11,022

 9,706

 5,735

 3,440

 1,911

 1,283

 1,585

 1,247

 726

 612

 513

 435

 401

 14,821

 14,546

 15,737

 18,052

 18,919

 18,594

 18,058

 18,777

 17,466

 15,361

 14,691

 13,527

 14,087

 13,445

 14,691

 15,120

 14,715

 10,356

 8,752

 7,288

 5,832

 6,076

 5,482

 3,387

 2,000

 1,228

 715

 522

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

FEBRUARY 2009 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: April 1, 2009

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

PORT CHICAGO TOP IN SUISUN BAY
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY HIGH

 29,433

 28,377

 27,980

 28,222

 25,877

 26,780

 29,104

 29,440

 29,303

 29,326

 31,212

 32,641

 33,098

 32,013

 31,466

 27,470

 26,047

 25,535

 25,774

 25,114

 26,381

 28,990

 28,853

 29,215

 31,095

 26,341

 25,298

 25,054

 24,711

 23,915

 23,397

 16,662

 17,173

 15,548

 16,271

 16,542

 16,639

 19,548

 19,321

 18,471

 17,644

 17,984

 17,840

 18,958

 19,162

 18,561

 18,461

 16,609

 17,666

 17,302

 15,906

 15,778

 16,760

 15,658

 16,013

 16,276

 12,720

 11,654

 11,943

 11,123

 11,027

 10,934

 23,410

 22,964

 22,572

 23,029

 22,679

 22,735

 23,734

 24,327

 24,145

 23,749

 24,488

 25,233

 25,807

 25,356

 24,916

 23,111

 22,230

 21,727

 20,966

 19,917

 20,656

 22,631

 22,283

 22,461

 24,098

 20,266

 19,178

 18,463

 18,108

 17,688

 17,270

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

DECEMBER 2008 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: January 6, 2009

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

PORT CHICAGO BOTTOM IN SUISUN BAY
UN PUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 19
- 7265

CECIL GUY TRUMAN , Plaintiff

- Appellant ,

v. MR. FRYE, Sergeant; MR. MCDOUGAL, Correctional Officer; MR. FARLEY, Correctional Officer , Defendants

- Appellees , and MR. HEATH, Magistrate , Defendant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia , at Alexandria

. Leonie M. Brinkema , District Judge. ( 1:18

- cv
- 00963

- LMB

- IDD )

Submitted : June 18, 2020 Decided: June 30, 2020

Before WYNN , THACKER, and RUSHING, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed and remanded by un published per curiam opinion

.
Cecil Guy Truman , Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIA M : Cecil Guy Truman seeks to appeal the district court’s orders granting Appellees’ motion to dismiss his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2018) complaint for failure to state a claim and denying Truman’s motion for reconsideration. Although “[t]he parties to this appea l have not questioned our jurisdiction . . . , we have an independent obligation to verify the existence of appellate jurisdiction” and may exercise jurisdiction only over final orders and certain interlocutory and collateral orders. Porter v. Zook , 803 F .3d 694, 696 (4th Cir. 2015) (internal quotation marks omitted); see 28 U.S.C. § 1292 (2018); Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(b); Cohen v. Beneficial Indus. Loan Corp ., 337 U.S. 541, 545

- 46 (1949). “Ordinarily,
a district court order is not final until it has resolved all claims as to all parties.” Porter , 803 F.3d at 696 ( emphasis and internal quotation marks omitted). “Regardless of the label given a district court decision, if it appears from the record that the district court has not adjudicated all of the issues in a case, then there is no final order.” Id. In this case, the district court failed to address Truman ’s claims that Jordan McDougal violated his rights under the Due Process and Equal Protection Clauses of the
Fourteenth Amendment

. Because the district court did not rule on those claims, it “never
issued a final decision” in this matter. Id. at 699. Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction and remand to the district court for consideration of Truman ’s remaining claims. We e xpress no opinion on the ultimate disposition of those claims, and we deny Truman ’s motion to appoint counsel. We dispense with oral argument because3 the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argume nt would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED AND REMANDED
[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 72 (Thursday, April 14, 2011)]
[Notices]
[Page 21090]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2011-9104]



[[Page 21090]]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SMALL BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION

[Disaster Declaration <greek-i>12519 and <greek-i>12520]


Florida Disaster <greek-i>FL-00060

AGENCY: U.S. Small Business Administration.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This is a notice of an Administrative declaration of a 
disaster for the State of Florida dated 04/07/2011.
    Incident: Severe Storms, Flooding and Tornadoes.
    Incident Period: 03/31/2011.
    Effective Date: 04/07/2011.
    Physical Loan Application Deadline Date: 06/06/2011.
    Economic Injury (EIDL) Loan Application Deadline Date: 01/09/2012.

ADDRESSES: Submit completed loan applications to: U.S. Small Business 
Administration, Processing and Disbursement Center, 14925 Kingsport 
Road, Fort Worth, TX 76155.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: A. Escobar, Office of Disaster 
Assistance, U.S. Small Business Administration, 409 3rd Street, SW., 
Suite 6050, Washington, DC 20416.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Notice is hereby given that as a result of 
the Administrator's disaster declaration, applications for disaster 
loans may be filed at the address listed above or other locally 
announced locations.
    The following areas have been determined to be adversely affected 
by the disaster:

Primary Counties: Hillsborough.
Contiguous Counties: Florida:
    Hardee, Manatee, Pasco, Pinellas, Polk.
    The Interest Rates are:

------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                                Percent
------------------------------------------------------------------------
For Physical Damage:
Homeowners with Credit Available Elsewhere...................      5.125
Homeowners without Credit Available Elsewhere................      2.563
Businesses with Credit Available Elsewhere...................      6.000
Businesses without Credit Available Elsewhere................      4.000
Non-Profit Organizations with Credit Available Elsewhere.....      3.250
Non-Profit Organizations without Credit Available Elsewhere..      3.000
For Economic Injury:
Businesses & Small Agricultural Cooperatives without Credit        4.000
 Available Elsewhere.........................................
Non-Profit Organizations without Credit Available Elsewhere..      3.000
------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The number assigned to this disaster for physical damage is 12519 C 
and for economic injury is 12520 0.
    The State which received an EIDL Declaration <greek-i> is Florida.

(Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Numbers 59002 and 59008)

    Dated: April 7, 2011.
Karen G. Mills,
Administrator.
[FR Doc. 2011-9104 Filed 4-13-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8025-01-P
§ 404.721 Evidence to presume a person is dead. If you cannot prove the person is dead but evidence of death is needed, we will presume he or she died at a certain time if you give us the following evidence: ( a ) A certified copy of, or extract from, an official report or finding by an agency or department of the United States that a missing person is *presumed to be* dead as set out in Federal law (5 U.S.C. 5565). Unless we have other evidence showing an actual date of death, we will use the date he or she was reported missing as the date of death.
( b ) Signed statements by those in a position to know and other records which show that the person has been absent from his or her residence and has not been heard from for at least 7 years. If the presumption of death is not rebutted pursuant to § 404.722, we will use as the person's date of death either the date he or she left home, the date ending the 7 year period, or some other date depending upon what the evidence shows is the most likely date of death.
( c ) If you are applying for benefits as the insured person's grandchild or stepgrandchild but the evidence does not identify a parent, we will presume the parent died in the first month in which the insured person became entitled to benefits.
[43 FR 24795, June 7, 1978, as amended at 60 FR 19164, Apr. 17, 1995]
Exhibit 32.1

Certification pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350 as Adopted Pursuant to Section 906

of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

Each of the undersigned officers of Transcontinental Realty Investors, Inc., a Nevada corporation (the Company) hereby
certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 that:



| | (i) | The Companys Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the six months ended June 30, 2010, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (ii) | The information contained in the Companys Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the six months ended June 30, 2010, fairly presents in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Company, at and for the periods indicated.
| | ---- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                      |  |                                         |  |                                                                                   
|--------------------- |  | --------------------------------------- |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                      |  | TRANSCONTINENTAL REALTY INVESTORS, INC.
|                      |  |                                        
|Date: August 16, 2010 |  | By:                                     |  | /s/ Daniel J. Moos                                                                
|                      |  |                                         |  | Daniel J. Moos                                                                    
|                      |  |                                         |  | President and Chief Executive Officer
(Principal Executive Officer)               
|                      |  |                                        
|Date: August 16, 2010 |  | By:                                     |  | /s/ Gene S. Bertcher                                                              
|                      |  |                                         |  | Gene S. Bertcher                                                                  
|                      |  |                                         |  | Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
(Principal Financial Officer)
§ 1002.289 How will VETS investigate a USERRA complaint? ( a ) In carrying out any investigation, VETS has, at all reasonable times, reasonable access to and the right to interview persons with information relevant to the investigation. VETS also has reasonable access to, for purposes of examination, the right to copy and receive any documents of any person or employer that VETS considers relevant to the investigation.
( b ) VETS may require by subpoena the attendance and testimony of witnesses and the production of documents relating to any matter under investigation. In case of disobedience of or resistance to the subpoena, the Attorney General may, at VETS' request, apply to any district court of the United States in whose jurisdiction such disobedience or resistance occurs for an order enforcing the subpoena. The district courts of the United States have jurisdiction to order compliance with the subpoena, and to punish failure to obey a subpoena as a contempt of court. This paragraph does not authorize VETS to seek issuance of a subpoena to the legislative or judicial branches of the United States.
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Joseph Dulman, Appellant.

No opinion. Present—Carswell, Johnston, Adel, Taylor and Lewis, JJ.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY HIGH

 7,712

 7,168

 5,722

 4,263

 2,158

 4,312

 7,862

 13,263

 13,894

 13,987

 13,001

 12,468

 12,642

 12,643

 12,526

 11,832

 9,682

 8,764

 7,554

 11,948

 17,749

 20,566

 19,589

 18,662

 18,698

 20,265

 20,248

 21,003

 21,126

 21,418

 20,167

 184

 185

 171

 186

 154

 161

 175

 226

 248

 317

 457

 413

 527

 567

 606

 632

 490

 619

 641

 650

 1,781

 4,258

 3,580

 2,435

 1,926

 1,874

 2,680

 3,202

 3,805

 4,329

 4,242

 1,399

 1,337

 1,127

 729

 620

 803

 1,345

 2,307

 3,252

 3,843

 3,970

 3,967

 4,389

 4,626

 4,714

 4,393

 3,729

 3,898

 3,369

 4,681

 7,112

 9,559

 8,873

 8,452

 8,710

 10,535

 11,406

 11,354

 11,890

 12,071

 11,849

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

JULY 2011 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: August 24, 2011

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

PORT CHICAGO BOTTOM IN SUISUN BAY