alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 402.100 Exemption six: Clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy. ( a ) *Documents affected.* We may withhold records about individuals if disclosure would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of their personal privacy.
( b ) *Balancing test.* In deciding whether to release records to you that contain personal or private information about someone else, we weigh the foreseeable harm of invading a person's privacy against the public interest in disclosure. In determining whether disclosure would be in the public interest, we will consider whether disclosure of the requested information would shed light on how a Government agency performs its statutory duties. However, in our evaluation of requests for records we attempt to guard against the release of information that might involve a violation of personal privacy because of a requester being able to “read between the lines” or piece together items that would constitute information that normally would be exempt from mandatory disclosure under Exemption Six.
( c ) *Examples.* Some of the information that we frequently withhold under Exemption Six is: Home addresses, ages, and minority group status of our employees or former employees; social security numbers; medical information about individuals who have filed a claim for disability benefits; names and addresses of individual beneficiaries of our programs, or benefits such individuals receive; earnings records, claim files, and other personal information SSA maintains.
[62 FR 4154, Jan. 29, 1997, as amended at 63 FR 35132, June 29, 1998]
```

[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 74 (Monday, April 18, 2011)]
[Notices]
[Page 21782]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2011-9411]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

NATIONAL SCIENCE FOUNDATION

National Science Board; Sunshine Act Meetings; Notice

    The National Science Board's Task Force on Merit Review (MR), 
pursuant to NSF regulations (45 CFR part 614), the National Science 
Foundation Act, as amended (42 U.S.C. 1862n-5), and the Government in 
the Sunshine Act (5 U.S.C. 552b), hereby gives notice in regard to the 
scheduling of a teleconference for the transaction of National Science 
Board business and other matters specified, as follows:

DATE and TIME:  April 25, 2011, 1 p.m.-3 p.m.

SUBJECT MATTER:  Task Force Chairman's Opening Remarks, Discussion of 
Task Force Recommendations and Task Force Chairman's Closing Remarks.

STATUS:  Open.

LOCATION:  This meeting will be held by teleconference at the National 
Science Board Office, National Science Foundation, 4201 Wilson Blvd., 
Arlington, VA 22230. A phone number for listening-in is not available. 
If the general public is interested in listening-in to this meeting 
held by teleconference, room 110 will be available at Stafford Place I, 
National Science Foundation, 4201 Wilson Blvd., Arlington, VA 22230. 
All visitors must contact the Board Office [call 703-292-7000 or send 
an e-mail message to [email protected]] at least 24 hours 
prior to the teleconference and provide name and organizational 
affiliation. All visitors must report to the NSF visitor desk located 
in the lobby at the 9th and N. Stuart Streets entrance on the day of 
the teleconference to receive a visitor's badge.

UPDATES AND POINT OF CONTACT:  Please refer to the National Science 
Board Web site http://www.nsf.gov/nsb for additional information and 
schedule updates (time, place, subject matter or status of meeting) may 
be found at http://www.nsf.gov/nsb/notices/. Point of contact for this 
meeting is: Kim Silverman, National Science Board Office, 4201Wilson 
Blvd., Arlington, VA 22230. Telephone: (703) 292-7000.

Daniel A. Lauretano,
Counsel to the National Science Board.
[FR Doc. 2011-9411 Filed 4-14-11; 11:15 am]
BILLING CODE 7555-01-P
```
```

[Congressional Bills 114th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 4072 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

114th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 4072

To remove a restriction that prohibits the use of Federal funds to pay 
   for maintenance of the memorial to honor Tomas G. Masaryk in the 
                         District of Columbia.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           November 18, 2015

 Ms. Schakowsky (for herself, Mrs. Dingell, and Mr. Barton) introduced 
  the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Natural 
                               Resources

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To remove a restriction that prohibits the use of Federal funds to pay 
   for maintenance of the memorial to honor Tomas G. Masaryk in the 
                         District of Columbia.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. RESTRICTION ON USE OF FEDERAL FUNDS REMOVED.

    Section 1(c) of Public Law 107-61 is amended by striking ``or its 
maintenance''.
                                 <all>
```
Exhibit 32

                              Multiband Corporation

                Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350
                             As Adopted Pursuant to
                  Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

         In  connection  with  this  Quarterly   Report  Form  10-Q,   Multiband
Corporation  (the  "Company")  for the period ended March 31, 2005,  I, James L.
Mandel, Chief Executive Officer of the Company,  hereby certify,  pursuant to 18
U.S.C.  Section 1350, as adopted  pursuant to Section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that:

1.    This Periodic Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a)
or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and

2.    The information contained in the Periodic Report fairly presents, in all
material  respects,  the  financial  condition  and results of operations of the
Company.

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Date: September 1, 2005               By:

                                                       /s/ James L. Mandel
                                                     Chief Executive Officer
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

         In  connection  with  this  Quarterly   Report  Form  10-Q,   Multiband
Corporation  (the  "Company")  for the period ended March 31, 2005, I, Steven M.
Bell,  Secretary and Treasurer of the Company,  hereby  certify,  pursuant to 18
U.S.C.  Section 1350, as adopted  pursuant to Section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that:

1.    This Periodic Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a)
or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and

2.    The information contained in the Periodic Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Date: September 1, 2005               By:

                                                        /s/ Steven M. Bell
                                                     Chief Financial Officer

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
### SUBCHAPTER IV—EFFORTS AGAINST HUMAN RIGHTS ABUSES
### SUBCHAPTER II—ASSISTING NORTH KOREANS IN NEED
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion

should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited

circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 06-40994

Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

Plaintiff-Appellee

v.

ALLAN ROBERTO RIVERA-GARCIA

Defendant-Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Texas

USDC No. 5:04-CR-1081-ALL

Before REAVLEY, BARKSDALE, and GARZA, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Allan Roberto Rivera-Garcia was convicted of violating 8 U.S.C. § 1326 by

being found in the United States without permission, following removal. He

appeals the sentence imposed in his case following this court’s remand for

resentencing in light of United States v. Booker, 543 U.S. 220 (2005).

Rivera-Garcia challenges the constitutionality of § 1326(b)’s treatment of

prior felony and aggravated felony convictions as sentencing factors rather than

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

F I L E D

December 11, 2007

Charles R. Fulbruge III

Clerk
No. 06-40994

2

elements of the offense that must be found by a jury in light of Apprendi v. New

Jersey, 530 U.S. 466 (2000). A panel of this court rejected Rivera-Garcia’s

Apprendi-based argument in his initial appeal. United States v. Rivera-Garcia,

167 F. App’x 989, 989-90 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 126 S. Ct. 2309 (2006). This

court’s previous decision stands as the law of the case. See United States v.

Becerra, 155 F.3d 740, 752-53 (5th Cir. 1998). 

Rivera-Garcia also contends that his sentence is unreasonable as a matter

of law because it was imposed pursuant to a de facto mandatory sentencing

scheme. He argues that post-Booker rulings issued by this court have effectively

reinstated the mandatory sentencing system found unconstitutional in Booker.

This court must follow its precedent addressing post-Booker sentencing unless

an intervening en banc or Supreme Court decision renders the decisions

inapplicable. See In re Brown, 457 F.3d 392, 395 n.1 (5th Cir. 2006). RiveraGarcia has cited no such decision. 

Rivera-Garcia’s sentence, which falls within his properly calculated

sentencing guideline range, is presumed reasonable. See Rita v. United States,

127 S. Ct. 2456, 2462-66 (2007); United States v. Alonzo, 435 F.3d 551, 554 (5th

Cir. 2006). Giving “great deference” to that sentence, and recognizing that the

sentencing court considered all the factors for a fair sentence under 18 U.S.C.

§ 3553(a), we conclude that Rivera-Garcia has failed to rebut the presumption

that his sentence was reasonable. See United States v. Nikonova, 480 F.3d 371,

376 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 128 S. Ct. 163 (2007). 

AFFIRMED.
(No. 74-CC-355

#### Texaco, Inc., Claimant, *vs.*State of Illinois, Department of Transportation, Respondent.

*Opinion filed March 25, 1974.*

Texaco, Inc., Claimant, pro se.

William J. Scott, Attorney General; Howard W. Feldman, Assistant Attorney General, for Respondent.

*307Per Curiam.
1 Gurdoglanyan, Nicole

From: Andrea Mazade [ajmazade@gmail.com] Sent: Monday, April 09, 2012 1:20 PM To: GovernmentAffairs Subject: Re: Docket No. DOT-OST-2012-0029

Dear Secretary LaHood:

I am writing today to express my strong support for JetBlue’s application to offer new beyond- p erimeter service at Reagan National and link the nation’s capital to two other important ca pital cities: San Juan, Puerto Rico (connecting onward to St. Thomas, the capital of the U.S. Virgin Islands) and Austin, Texas.

JetBlue’s application will provide much-needed low-fare, high-quality se rvice from the capital’s downtown airport to the capital of our closest territory, and to the capital of the largest of the contiguous 48 states. Both San Juan and Austin are crying out for new JetBlue servi ce to DCA, being two of the ten largest markets without nonstop air service to the airport. Their application will bring tremendous public benefit and muchneeded low-fare competition to DCA.

Please join me in offering your support for JetBlue’s application.

Andrea Mazade

Austin, TX

ajmazade@gmail.com
(No. 74-CC-637

#### Southeastern Ill. Electric Coop., Inc., Claimant, *vs.*State of Illinois, Department of Conservation, Respondent.

*Opinion filed May 15, 1974.*

Joseph Hale, Attorney for Claimant.

William J. Scott, Attorney General; Howard W. Feldman, Assistant Attorney General, for Respondent.

Per Curiam.
#### §§ 365.171-365.999 [Reserved]
### §§1161 to 1165. Repealed. Pub. L. 98–509, title III, §301(d), Oct. 19, 1984, 98 Stat. 2364

Section 1161, Pub. L. 92–255, title III, §301, Mar. 21, 1972, 86 Stat. 74, related to development, and initial promulgation no later than nine months after Mar. 21, 1972, by the President, of a national drug abuse strategy.

Section 1162, Pub. L. 92–255, title III, §302, Mar. 21, 1972, 86 Stat. 75; Pub. L. 94–237, §4(c)(2), (3), (5)(A), Mar. 19, 1976, 90 Stat. 244; Pub. L. 96–181, §5(a), (b), Jan. 2, 1980, 93 Stat. 1311; Pub. L. 97–35, title IX, §973(b), Aug. 13, 1981, 95 Stat. 598, related to establishment and membership of a Strategy Council, interim provision of services by the Director, and review and commentary on the national drug abuse strategy by those Federal officials participating in its preparation.

Section 1163, Pub. L. 92–255, title III, §303, Mar. 21, 1972, 86 Stat. 75, related to contents of the national drug abuse strategy.

Section 1164, Pub. L. 92–255, title III, §304, Mar. 21, 1972, 86 Stat. 75; Pub. L. 94–237, §4(c)(4), Mar. 19, 1976, 90 Stat. 244; Pub. L. 96–181, §5(c), Jan. 2, 1980, 93 Stat. 1311, related to preparation of the national drug abuse strategy.

Section 1165, Pub. L. 92–255, title III, §305, Mar. 21, 1972, 86 Stat. 75; Pub. L. 94–237, §5, Mar. 19, 1976, 90 Stat. 244; Pub. L. 98–24, §4(a), Apr. 26, 1983, 97 Stat. 183, related to submission by the President to the Congress, on or before Aug. 1, 1984, and every two years thereafter, of a written report describing the national drug abuse strategy, and prescribed the contents of the report.
### §1631m. Lien, attachment, garnishment, etc., of transferred property

No property conveyed, transferred, assigned, delivered, or paid to the designee of the President under this subchapter, or the net proceeds thereof, shall be liable to lien, attachment, garnishment, trustee process, or execution, or subject to any order or decree of any court, except as provided in this subchapter.

(Mar. 10, 1950, ch. 54, title II, §214, as added Aug. 9, 1955, ch. 645, §3, 69 Stat. 570.)
(No. 74-CC-205

#### Robert O. Sloan, Claimant, *vs.*State of Illinois, Department of Law Enforcement, Respondent.

*Opinion filed January 8, 1974.*

Robert O. Sloan, Claimant, pro se.

William J. Scott, Attorney General; William E. Webber, Assistant Attorney General, for Respondent.

Per Curiam.
### §§881–1, 881a. Transferred

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section 881–1, Pub. L. 91–513, title II, §511A, as added Pub. L. 100–690, title VI, §6080(a), Nov. 18, 1988, 102 Stat. 4326, which related to expedited procedures for seized conveyances, was renumbered §518 of Pub. L. 91–513 by Pub. L. 101–647, title X, §1002(h)(1), Nov. 29, 1990, 104 Stat. 4828, transferred to section 888 of this title and subsequently repealed.

Section 881a, Pub. L. 99–198, title XVII, §1764, Dec. 23, 1985, 99 Stat. 1652, which related to production control of controlled substances, was renumbered section 519 of the Controlled Substances Act by Pub. L. 101–647, title X, §1002(h)(2), Nov. 29, 1990, 104 Stat. 4828, and is classified to section 889 of this title.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

DAY HIGH

 140

 143

 145

 121

 119

 108

 114

 114

 107

 115

 107

 100

 94

 98

 91

 96

 93

 92

 95

 92

 97

 95

 95

 104

 107

 104

 98

 97

 136

 138

 111

 108

 108

 97

 102

 98

 93

 95

 100

 94

 91

 90

 90

 91

 91

 91

 92

 90

 91

 92

 90

 87

 104

 98

 95

 95

 137

 140

 125

 111

 113

 102

 106

 106

 96

 106

 104

 97

 92

 93

 90

 93

 92

 92

 93

 91

 94

 93

 92

 92

 106

 101

 97

 96

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

FEBRUARY 2010 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: March 3, 2010

HIGH LOW MEAN

 54.0

 54.0

 53.5

 53.1

 54.3

 54.1

 54.0

 53.5

 53.5

 52.9

 53.4

 54.2

 54.5

 54.7

 54.8

 55.0

 55.4

 55.6

 55.0

 54.1

 53.4

 54.0

 53.1

 53.6

 54.5

 54.5

 55.1

 55.3

 51.1

 52.5

 51.2

 52.3

 52.6

 53.5

 52.8

 51.9

 52.4

 51.3

 52.0

 52.1

 52.7

 52.4

 52.3

 53.0

 53.1

 53.4

 54.0

 53.0

 52.7

 52.2

 52.1

 51.8

 52.7

 53.8

 53.5

 53.2

 52.5

 53.0

 52.5

 52.8

 53.5

 53.8

 53.4

 52.8

 53.0

 52.2

 52.7

 53.2

 53.6

 53.5

 53.6

 54.0

 54.2

 54.5

 54.5

 53.6

 53.1

 53.0

 52.6

 52.6

 53.6

 54.2

 54.1

 54.3

HIGH LOW MEAN

 10.1

 10.1

 10.3

 10.2

 10.1

 10.0

 10.0

 10.1

 10.1

 10.1

 10.2

 10.3

 10.3

 10.4

 10.4

 10.4

 10.4

 10.4

 10.3

 10.3

 10.5

 10.6

 10.7

 10.6

 10.3

 10.1

 10.1

 10.3

 9.7

 9.8

 10.1

 10.0

 9.8

 9.8

 9.7

 9.9

 10.0

 10.0

 10.0

 10.1

 10.1

 10.2

 10.1

 10.2

 10.2

 10.2

 10.0

 10.0

 10.3

 10.4

 10.5

 10.2

 9.9

 9.9

 9.9

 10.0

 9.9

 9.9

 10.2

 10.2

 10.0

 9.9

 9.8

 10.0

 10.1

 10.1

 10.1

 10.2

 10.2

 10.3

 10.3

 10.3

 10.3

 10.3

 10.2

 10.2

 10.4

 10.5

 10.6

 10.5

 10.1

 10.0

 10.0

 10.1

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

RIPON ON THE STANISLAUS RIVER

 ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS WATER TEMPERATURE, DEG DISSOLVED OXYZEN, PPM
# C_2012402EN.01002501.xml

| 29.12.2012 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 402/25 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

29.12.2012

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 402/25

---

DECISION TO CLOSE THE FORMAL INVESTIGATION PROCEDURE AFTER WITHDRAWAL BY MEMBER STATE

State aid — Greece

(Articles 107 to 109 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union)

Commission notice pursuant to Article 108(2) TFEU — Withdrawal of notification

State aid C 21/09 — (ex N 105/08, N 168/08 and N 169/08) — Greece

Public financing of infrastructure and equipment at the port of Pireaus — part notified under ex N 169/08

(Text with EEA relevance)

2012/C 402/10

The Commission has decided to close the formal investigation procedure under Article 108(2) TFEU, initiated on 13 July 2009 (1) in respect of the financing of the acquisition of loading and unloading equipment in the container terminal section of the Port of Piraeus (notified under N 169/08), recording that Greece has withdrawn its notification on 1 October 2010 and will not pursue this aid project further.

1

---

(1)  OJ C 245, 13.10.2009, p. 21.

1

---
##### Table of Contents



UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
 Washington, D.C. 20549
 FORM 8-K
 CURRENT REPORT
Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
 Date of Report (Date of earliest event reported): July 15, 2011
 Endeavour International Corporation
  Delaware
    
    001-32212
    
    88-0448389(State or other jurisdiction of
    
    (Commission File Number)
    
    (IRS Employer Identification No.)incorporation)
 1001 Fannin, Suite 1600, Houston, Texas
    
    77002(Address of principal executive offices)
    
    (Zip Code)
 (713) 307-8700
 N/A  (Former Name or former address if changed since last report.)
  o
    
    Written communications pursuant to Rule 425 under the Securities Act (17 CFR 230.425)o
    
    Soliciting material pursuant to Rule 14a-12 under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.14a-12)o
    
    Pre-commencement communications pursuant to Rule 14d-2(b) under the Exchange Act (17 CFR
240.14d-2(b))o
    
    Pre-commencement communications pursuant to Rule 13e-4(c) under the Exchange Act (17 CFR
240.13e-4(c))




---



TABLE OF CONTENTS  Item 1.01 Entry into a Material Definitive AgreementItem 2.03 Creation of a Direct Financial Obligation or an Obligation under an Off-Balance Sheet Arrangement of a RegistrantItem 7.01 Regulation FD DisclosureItem 8.01 Other EventsItem 9.01 Financial Statements and ExhibitsSIGNATURESEXHIBIT INDEXEX-99.1EX-99.2EX-99.3    Table of Contents  
 Item 1.01 Entry into a Material Definitive Agreement.
 Marcellus Acquisition
 Company Asset Purchase Agreement Sellers 3 4  Marcellus Acquisition
   Senior Term Loan Amendment
 Amendment Senior Term Loan
   
 Item 2.03
    
    Creation of a Direct Financial Obligation or an Obligation under an Off-Balance Sheet
Arrangement of a Registrant.
  
 Item 7.01 Regulation FD Disclosure.




---



##### Table of Contents



Item 8.01 Other Events.
   
 Item 9.01 Financial Statements and Exhibits.
  99.1
    
    Certain information provided to potential investors.99.2
    
    Press release (Marcellus Acquisition and operational update) of Endeavour
International Corporation dated July 18, 2011.99.3
    
    Press release (offering) of Endeavour International Corporation dated July 18, 2011.




---



##### Table of Contents



SIGNATURES
  ENDEAVOUR INTERNATIONAL CORPORATIONDate:  July 18, 2011
    By:
    /s/ Robert L. ThompsonRobert L. ThompsonChief Accounting Officer




---



##### Table of Contents



EXHIBIT INDEX
 99.1
    
    Certain information provided to potential investors.99.2
    
    Press release (Marcellus Acquisition and operational update) of Endeavour
International Corporation dated July 18, 2011.99.3
    
    Press release (offering) of Endeavour International Corporation dated July 18, 2011.
#### Charles A. Hollingsworth v. New York Railways Company.

Application denied, with ten dollars costs. Order signed. Present — Ingraham, P. J., Clarke, Scott, Dowling and Hotchkiss, JJ.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA 

EQUITYTHINK, LLC, A NEVADA 

LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY, 

Appellant, 

vs. 

13-H PARTNERSHIP, LLC, A NEW 

MEXICO PARTNERSHIP, 

Resnondent. 

ORDER DISMISSING APPEAL 

No. 69711 

FILED 

JUN 0 2 2016 

TRACIE K. LINDEMAN 

CLERK OF SUPREME COURT 

DEPUTY CLERK 

Pursuant to the stipulation of the parties, and cause 

appearing, this appeal is dismissed. The parties shall bear their own costs 

and attorney fees. NRAP 42(b). 

It is so ORDERED. 

CLERK OF THE SUPREME COURT 

TRACE K. LINDE Zif 

cc: Hon. Leon Aberasturi, District Judge 

Woodburn & Wedge 

McDonald Carano Wilson LLP/Reno 

Third District Court Clerk 

SUPREME COURT 

OF 

NEVADA 

CLERK'S ORDER 

(U1-1947 

BY: e w'n 

1Co-17 I leS"
§ 30.403 Will OWCP pay for home health care, nursing home, and assisted living services? ( a ) OWCP will authorize and pay for home health care claimed under section 7384t of the Act, whether or not such care constitutes skilled nursing care, so long as the care has been determined to be medically necessary. OWCP will pay for approved periods of care by a registered nurse, licensed practical nurse, home health aide or similarly trained individual, subject to the pre-authorization requirements described in paragraph (c) of this section.
( b ) OWCP will also authorize and pay for periods of nursing home and assisted living services claimed under section 7384t of the Act, so long as such services have been determined to be medically necessary, subject to the pre-authorization requirements described in paragraph (c) of this section.
( c ) To file an initial claim for home health care, nursing home, or assisted living services, the beneficiary must submit Form EE-17A to OWCP and identify his or her treating physician. OWCP then provides the treating physician with Form EE-17B, which asks the physician to submit a letter of medical necessity and verify that a timely face-to-face physical examination of the beneficiary took place. This particular pre-authorization process must be followed only for the initial claim for home health care, nursing home, and assisted living services; any subsequent request for pre-authorization must satisfy OWCP's usual medical necessity requirements. If a claimant disagrees with the decision of OWCP that the claimed services are not medically necessary, he or she may utilize the adjudicatory process described in subpart D of this part.
[84 FR 3052, Feb. 8, 2019]