alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
### §§4081 to 4086. Repealed. Pub. L. 103–382, title III, §364, Oct. 20, 1994, 108 Stat. 3975

Section 4081, Pub. L. 98–377, title IX, §902, as added Pub. L. 100–297, title II, §2302, Apr. 28, 1988, 102 Stat. 320; amended Pub. L. 102–103, title III, §301, Aug. 17, 1991, 105 Stat. 499, related to purpose of star schools program.

Section 4082, Pub. L. 98–377, title IX, §903, as added Pub. L. 100–297, title II, §2302, Apr. 28, 1988, 102 Stat. 320; amended Pub. L. 102–103, title III, §302, Aug. 17, 1991, 105 Stat. 499, authorized grants for telecommunications facilities and equipment, instructional programming, and technical assistance.

Section 4083, Pub. L. 98–377, title IX, §904, as added Pub. L. 100–297, title II, §2302, Apr. 28, 1988, 102 Stat. 321; amended Pub. L. 102–103, title III, §303, Aug. 17, 1991, 105 Stat. 500, related to eligibility of telecommunications partnerships for grants.

Section 4084, Pub. L. 98–377, title IX, §905, as added Pub. L. 100–297, title II, §2302, Apr. 28, 1988, 102 Stat. 321; amended Pub. L. 102–103, title III, §304, Aug. 17, 1991, 105 Stat. 501, related to applications for grants.

Section 4085, Pub. L. 98–377, title IX, §906, as added Pub. L. 100–297, title II, §2302, Apr. 28, 1988, 102 Stat. 323, related to dissemination of courses and materials under star schools program.

Section 4085a, Pub. L. 98–377, title IX, §907, as added Pub. L. 102–103, title III, §305(2), Aug. 17, 1991, 105 Stat. 502, related to continuing eligibility for grants.

Section 4085b, Pub. L. 98–377, title IX, §908, as added Pub. L. 102–103, title III, §305(2), Aug. 17, 1991, 105 Stat. 503; amended Pub. L. 103–227, title IX, §961, Mar. 31, 1994, 108 Stat. 263, required independent evaluation of the star schools program.

Section 4085c, Pub. L. 98–377, title IX, §909, as added Pub. L. 102–103, title III, §305(2), Aug. 17, 1991, 105 Stat. 504, authorized assistance for acquiring satellite time.

Section 4085d, Pub. L. 98–377, title IX, §910, as added Pub. L. 102–103, title III, §305(2), Aug. 17, 1991, 105 Stat. 504, authorized grants for dissemination and technical assistance to State and local educational agencies.

Section 4086, Pub. L. 98–377, title IX, §911, formerly §907, as added Pub. L. 100–297, title II, §2302, Apr. 28, 1988, 102 Stat. 324; amended Pub. L. 102–73, title VIII, §802(c), July 25, 1991, 105 Stat. 361; renumbered §911, Pub. L. 102–103, title III, §305(1), Aug. 17, 1991, 105 Stat. 502, defined terms used in this subchapter.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Short Title

Section 901 of title IX of Pub. L. 98–377, as added by Pub. L. 100–297, title II, §2302, Apr. 28, 1988, 102 Stat. 320, provided that title IX of Pub. L. 98–377 [enacting this subchapter] could be cited as the "Star Schools Program Assistance Act", prior to repeal by Pub. L. 103–382, title III, §364, Oct. 20, 1994, 108 Stat. 3975.
C O U R T O F A P P E A LS EI GHTH D I STRI CT OF TEX AS ELPASO, TEXAS

I N RE: J OHN O’ QUI

NN and CHARL ES MUSS L EWHI TE, Re la tor s. § § § § § § No . 0 8- 09 -0 00 98 -C V AN ORI GI

NAL PROCEEDI

NG I N MANDA MUS

M EM OR

AN DA UM OP IN ION ON P ETIT ION F OR WRIT OF M ANDAM US Relators, John O’Quinn and Charles Musslewhite, s ee k m andamus re lief ag ainst the Honora ble L inda Y. Chew, J udg e of the 327th D istrict Court of El Paso County , Texas. On April 7, 2009, we g rante d Re l at o rs motion for emer g ency relief and stay ed proc eeding s in the trial court pending resolution of this mandamus proce eding
. To be e ntitled to mandamus relief, a relator must mee t two r equire ments. First, the re lator must show that the trial cour t clear ly abused its discre tion. In re Prude ntial Insurance Company of America , 148 S.W .3d 124, 135 (Tex. 2004). Second, the r elator must dem o n s t ra te he ha s no adequate reme dy

by appea l. Id. at 136. Ba sed on the re cord be fore us, we a re una ble to conclude that Relators ar e entitled to re lief. The pe tition for writ of mandamus is denied.T h e Re a l P arti e s in I n te r e s t, Wa lt e r L
. B o y a k i, M ir an d a & B o y a k i, an d

Ru b e nP. H e r

n a n d e z, have f iled a motion to rescind the stay order and a motion for sanctions. We g rant the f irst and deny the se c on d. We n ote a t th e ou tse t th a t a ll o f t he pa rt ie s are lic e ns e d att or

ne y s. Rul e 52 .1 1 p e rm its an appe llate cour

t to impos e sanc tions on a party or attorne y

who is not acting in good faith as i n d i ca t edb y

an y o f t h e f o l l o wi n g: (a ) f ili nga pe tit ion that is c le arl y

g ro un dle ss; (b ) b ri n gi n g t h e p et i t i o ns o l el y fo r d el ay o f a nu n d er l y i n g p ro ce ed i n g; (c) g rossly

misstating or omitting a

n obviously

important and mater ial fac t in the petition or response; or (d) f iling an a ppendix o r re cord that is clearly misleading beca

use of the omission of ob vio us ly

imp or tant a nd ma te ri a l e vid e nc e of

do c ume nts
. T EX .R.A PP .P. 52.11. We exercise the disc re t i o n af forded us by

Rule 52.11 with caution and only afte r ca ref ul deliberation. In re Lerma , 144 S.W .3d 21, 26 (Tex.App.--El Paso 2004, orig . proce eding ). The
rec ord bef

ore us r efle cts alleg ations of malfe asanc e by and ag ainst all parties. By virtue of our stay order , a sanc tions hearingin the trial court set for April 8, 2009 did not occur . Whil e we do not condone the behavior

of the pa rties i n this li tigation, we believe the matter is better addre ssed by

the tr ia l c ourt ’s re so lut ion

of the pe nd ingsa

nc tio n is su e s. We d e ny

the mot ion

fo r a pp e llate sanc tio ns .

J une 3, 2009 ANN CRAWFORD McCLURE, J ustice B e f o r e C h e w , C
. J. , M c C l u r e , a n d R i v e r a , JJ. Chew, C.J ., not participating
September 17, 2015

Mr. Jared Willard

Senior Video Producer

Springfield, Missouri, Public Information Office

840 Boonville Avenue

Springfield, MO 65801

Dear Mr. Willard :

This letter is to inform you that we are unable to process your petition for an exemption from

part 21, subpart H, and § § 45.23(b), 91.151, 91.405(a), 91.407(a)(1), 91.409(a)(1) and (2), and

91.417(a) and (b) of Title 14, Code of Federal Regulations (14 CF R). It explains why we

cannot process your request and what you should do in the next 30 days.

Why We Can n o t Process Your Request

We post ed your exemption request on behalf of the Springfield, Missouri, Public Information

Office to D ocket No

. FAA− 20 15

− 2618 on July 6, 2015, but we are unable to process your

request any further. Your petition does no t comply with the requirements of § 11.81 (copy

enclosed). For us to consider the request any further, you must send us all of the following:

 The reasons why granting the request would be in the public interest; that is, how it would

benefit the public as a whole.

 Any additional information, views, or arguments available to support your request.

For more detailed information relating to submitting petitio ns for exemption, please visit

http://aes.faa.gov/petition/index.html . This website helps the petitioner to meet Federal

Aviation A dministration (FAA) requirement outlines in § 11.81 and helps answer any

questions you may have.

What You Should Do

If you want us to process your request any further, you must submit the requested information

within 30 days. Please note that § 11.63(d) requires you to send your petition for exemption

at least 120 days before the proposed effective date of the exemptio n.2

If We Do Not Hear From You

If we do not receive the information, we will close the docket without notifying you further.

If you have any questions you may call the 333 Information Line (202) 267

- 2999.

Sincerely,

/s/

Brittany Newton

Program Analyst, Airmen and

Airspace Rules Division

Enclosure s34
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

DAY HIGH

 186

 183

 184

 197

 286

 358

 305

 321

 237

 220

 197

 200

 205

 187

 192

 205

 286

 297

 282

 286

 240

 233

 214

 171

 165

 166

 161

 167

 179

 203

 171

 170

 168

 172

 171

 166

 163

 165

 160

 152

 153

 151

 146

 142

 142

 147

 149

 149

 149

 145

 144

 142

 141

 141

 137

 139

 140

 142

 143

 143

 179

 178

 178

 180

 192

 207

 215

 205

 177

 169

 164

 162

 159

 156

 156

 164

 187

 184

 185

 180

 168

 163

 152

 146

 145

 144

 144

 147

 151

 154

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

JUNE 2004 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: July 6, 2004

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

RIO VISTA ON THE SACRAMENTO RIVER
### §1475f. Repealed. Pub. L. 105–277, div. G, subdiv. A, title XIII, §1336(1), Oct. 21, 1998, 112 Stat. 2681–790

Section, act Jan. 27, 1948, ch. 36, title VIII, §811, as added Pub. L. 101–246, title II, §209, Feb. 16, 1990, 104 Stat. 53, related to recovery of indebtedness owed by person to United States arising out of activities of United States Information Agency.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date of Repeal

Repeal effective Oct. 1, 1999, see section 1301 of Pub. L. 105–277, set out as an Effective Date note under section 6531 of this title.
[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 72 (Thursday, April 14, 2011)]
[Notices]
[Page 21035]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2011-8979]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF LABOR

Employment and Training Administration

[TA-W-74,081]


General Motors Vehicle Manufacturing, Formerly Known as General 
Motors Corporation, Shreveport Assembly Plant, Including On-Site Leased 
Workers From Aerotek, Kelly Services and Voith Industrial Services, 
Inc., Formerly Known as Premier Manufacturing Support Services, 
Shreveport, LA; Amended Certification Regarding Eligibility To Apply 
for Worker Adjustment Assistance

    In accordance with Section 223 of the Trade Act of 1974, as amended 
(``Act''), 19 U.S.C. 2273, the Department of Labor issued a 
Certification of Eligibility to Apply for Worker Adjustment Assistance 
on July 27, 2010, applicable to workers of General Motors Vehicle 
Manufacturing, formerly known as General Motors Corporation, Shreveport 
Assembly Plant, including on-site leased workers from Aerotek and Kelly 
Services, Shreveport, Louisiana. Workers are engaged in the production 
of vehicles. The Notice was published in the Federal Register on August 
13, 2010 (75 FR 49530).
    At the request of a petitioner, the Department reviewed the 
certification for workers of the subject firm. The company reports that 
workers leased from Voith Industrial Services, Inc., formerly known as 
Premier Manufacturing Support Services, were employed on-site at the 
Shreveport, Louisiana location of General Motors Vehicle Manufacturing, 
Shreveport Assembly Plant. The Department has determined that these 
workers were sufficiently under the control of General Motors Vehicle 
Manufacturing to be considered leased workers.
    Based on these findings, the Department is amending this 
certification to include workers leased from Voith Industrial Services, 
Inc., formerly known as Premier Manufacturing Support Services, working 
on-site at the Shreveport, Louisiana location of General Motors Vehicle 
Manufacturing.
    The amended notice applicable to TA-W-74,081 is hereby issued as 
follows:

    All workers of General Motors Vehicle Manufacturing, formerly 
known as General Motors Corporation, Shreveport Assembly Plant, 
including on-site leased workers from Aerotek, Kelly Services, and 
Voith Industrial Services, Inc., formerly known as Premier 
Manufacturing Support Services, Shreveport, Louisiana, who became 
totally or partially separated from employment on or after August 
28, 2010, through July 27, 2012, and all workers in the group 
threatened with total or partial separation from employment on the 
date of certification through two years from the date of 
certification, are eligible to apply for adjustment assistance under 
Chapter 2 of Title II of the Trade Act of 1974, as amended.

    Signed at Washington, DC, this 4th day of April, 2011.
Del Min Amy Chen,
Certifying Officer, Office of Trade Adjustment Assistance.
[FR Doc. 2011-8979 Filed 4-13-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510-FN-P
### **CHAPTER 46—INTERNATIONAL INVESTMENT AND TRADE IN SERVICES SURVEY**

Sec.
3101.
Congressional statement of findings and declaration of purpose.
3102.
Definitions.
3103.
Presidential authority and duties.
3104.
Rules and regulations.
3105.
Enforcement.
3106.
Use of experts and administrative support services.
3107.
Consultations; creation of independent public advisory committees.
3108.
Authorization of appropriations.
#### § 243.1 Prohibition against garnishment.

Except as hereinafter provided in this part, no benefits paid under the Railroad Retirement Act are assignable or subject to any tax or to garnishment, attachment, or other legal process (including any order issued by any court in connection with a bankruptcy proceeding), nor shall any payment be anticipated.
# C_2012022EN.01000901.xml

| 27.1.2012 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 22/9 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

27.1.2012

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 22/9

---

Information communicated by Member States regarding State aid granted under Commission Regulation (EC) No 1857/2006 on the application of Articles 87 and 88 of the Treaty to State aid to small and medium-sized enterprises active in the production of agricultural products and amending Regulation (EC) No 70/2001

2012/C 22/05

Aid No: SA.34212 (12/XA)

Member State: Estonia

Region: Estonia

Title of aid scheme or name of company receiving an individual aid: Turuarendustoetus

Legal basis:

| 1) | Maaelu ja põllumajandusturu korraldamise seaduse § 11 lõige 1 ja § 18 lõige 1 |
| --- | --- |

1)

Maaelu ja põllumajandusturu korraldamise seaduse § 11 lõige 1 ja § 18 lõige 1

| 2) | Põllumajandusministri 6. jaanuar 2012. a määrus nr 3 „Turuarendustoetuse taotlemise ja taotluse menetlemise kord, nende kulude loetelu, mille hüvitamiseks turuarendustoetust antakse, ning toetuse määr” |
| --- | --- |

2)

Põllumajandusministri 6. jaanuar 2012. a määrus nr 3 „Turuarendustoetuse taotlemise ja taotluse menetlemise kord, nende kulude loetelu, mille hüvitamiseks turuarendustoetust antakse, ning toetuse määr”

Annual expenditure planned under the scheme or overall amount of individual aid granted to the company: Annual overall amount of the budget planned under the scheme: EUR 1,50 million

Maximum aid intensity: 85 %

Date of implementation: —

Duration of scheme or individual aid award: 26 January 2012-31 December 2013

Objective of aid: Technical support (Article 15 of Regulation (EC) No 1857/2006)

Sector(s) concerned: Crop and animal production, hunting and related service activities

Name and address of the granting authority:

| Põllumajandusministeerium |
| --- |
| Lai tn 39/Lai tn 41 |
| 15056 Tallinn |
| EESTI/ESTONIA |

Põllumajandusministeerium

Lai tn 39/Lai tn 41

15056 Tallinn

EESTI/ESTONIA

Website: http://www.agri.ee/turuarendustoetus/

Other information: —

---
EXHIBIT 31.1
 CCFNB BANCORP, INC.
 CEO CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
SECTION 302 OF THE  SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
  1.
    
    I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of CCFNB Bancorp, Inc. for the
quarterly period ended June 30, 2009;
 2.
    
    Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a
material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in
light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with
respect to the quarterly period covered by this amended report.
 3.
    
    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information
included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition,
results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods
presented in this amended report;
 4.
    
    The registrants other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing and
maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e)
and 15d  15 (e) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange
Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and have:
     5.
    
    The registrants other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most
recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants
auditors and the audit committee of the registrants board of directors (or persons
performing the equivalent functions):
 (a)
    
    All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of
internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect
the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information;
and
 (b)
    
 Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who
have a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial reporting.
  /s/ Lance O. DiehlLance O. DiehlChief Executive Officer
§ 401.150 Compatible purposes. ( a ) *General.* The Privacy Act allows us to disclose information maintained in a system of records without your consent to any other party if such disclosure is pursuant to a routine use published in the system's notice of system of records. A “Routine use” must be compatible with the purpose for which SSA collected the information.
( b ) *Notice of routine use disclosures.* A list of permissible routine use disclosures is included in every system of records notice published in the Federal Register.
( c ) *Determining compatibility* — ( 1 ) *Disclosure to carry out SSA programs.* We disclose information for published routine uses necessary to carry out SSA's programs.
( 2 ) *Disclosure to carry out programs similar to SSA programs.* We may disclose information for the administration of other government programs. These disclosures are pursuant to published routine uses where the use is compatible with the purpose for which the information was collected. These programs generally meet the following conditions: ( i ) The program is clearly identifiable as a Federal, State, or local government program.
( ii ) The information requested concerns eligibility, benefit amounts, or other matters of benefit status in a Social Security program and is relevant to determining the same matters in the other program. For example, we disclose information to the Railroad Retirement Board for pension and unemployment compensation programs, to the Department of Veterans Affairs for its benefit programs, to worker's compensation programs, to State general assistance programs and to other income maintenance programs at all levels of government. We also disclose for health maintenance programs like Medicaid and Medicare.
( iii ) The information will be used for appropriate epidemiological or similar research purposes.
[72 FR 20941, Apr. 27, 2007]
### §3301. Securities fraud offenses

(a) Definition.—In this section, the term "securities fraud offense" means a violation of, or a conspiracy or an attempt to violate—

(1) section 1348;

(2) section 32(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78ff(a));

(3) section 24 of the Securities Act of 1933 (15 U.S.C. 77x);

(4) section 217 of the Investment Advisers Act of 1940 (15 U.S.C. 80b–17);

(5) section 49 of the Investment Company Act of 1940 (15 U.S.C. 80a–48); or

(6) section 325 of the Trust Indenture Act of 1939 (15 U.S.C. 77yyy).

(b) Limitation.—No person shall be prosecuted, tried, or punished for a securities fraud offense, unless the indictment is found or the information is instituted within 6 years after the commission of the offense.

(Added Pub. L. 111–203, title X, §1079A(b)(1), July 21, 2010, 124 Stat. 2079.)

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date

Section effective 1 day after July 21, 2010, except as otherwise provided, see section 4 of Pub. L. 111–203, set out as a note under section 5301 of Title 12, Banks and Banking.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY HIGH

 374

 371

 289

 292

 271

 270

 293

 302

 312

 336

 305

 333

 331

 276

 337

 297

 295

 285

 288

 284

 286

 288

 296

 283

 265

 288

 296

 289

 298

 293

 255

 209

 202

 196

 190

 186

 199

 231

 227

 241

 265

 254

 252

 244

 231

 242

 239

 242

 229

 237

 229

 242

 222

 210

 203

 202

 216

 216

 196

 198

 203

 194

 266

 257

 233

 231

 225

 236

 252

 260

 267

 298

 263

 301

 286

 240

 298

 275

 270

 260

 265

 261

 269

 260

 249

 234

 232

 247

 269

 246

 251

 252

 222

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

MARCH 2019 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: April 8, 2019

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

DELTA MENDOTA CANAL AT CHECK 13 (O'NEILL)