alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY ELEV

 487.21

 487.00

 486.76

 486.60

 486.44

 486.32

 486.14

 485.95

 485.78

 485.54

 485.27

 485.23

 484.99

 484.84

 484.72

 484.61

 484.48

 484.25

 484.09

 484.00

 483.79

 483.58

 483.35

 483.16

 482.98

 482.77

 482.71

 482.44

 482.36

 482.06

 481.69

 180.0

 179.5

 178.9

 178.4

 178.0

 177.7

 177.2

 176.8

 176.3

 175.7

 175.0

 174.9

 174.3

 173.9

 173.6

 173.3

 173.0

 172.4

 172.0

 171.7

 171.2

 170.7

 170.1

 169.6

 169.1

 168.6

 168.5

 167.8

 167.6

 166.8

 165.9

STORAGE

-0.6

-0.6

-0.6

-0.4

-0.4

-0.3

-0.5

-0.5

-0.4

-0.6

-0.7

-0.1

-0.6

-0.4

-0.3

-0.3

-0.3

-0.6

-0.4

-0.2

-0.5

-0.5

-0.6

-0.5

-0.5

-0.5

-0.2

-0.7

-0.2

-0.8

-0.9

CHANGE

140

153

127

240

190

259

216

187

208

113

78

374

119

239

235

235

206

82

176

241

92

78

56

109

120

86

443

296

468

201

111

INFLOW

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

MADERA

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

SPILL

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 200

 337

 249

 248

 246

FRIANT-KERN

 6

 8

 2

 1

 9

 1

 3

 3

 6

 2

 6

 2

 9

 10

 4

 6

 4

 9

 22

 12

 16

 2

 5

 7

 5

 8

 5

 1

 5

 9

 6

C.F.S.

 .07

 .10

 .02

 .01

 .11

 .01

 .03

 .04

 .07

 .02

 .07

 .02

 .11

 .12

 .05

 .07

 .05

 .11

 .27

 .15

 .19

 .03

 .06

 .08

 .06

 .10

 .06

 .01

 .06

 .11

 .07

INCHES

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .02

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .03

 .00

 .82

 .01

 .30

 .62

 2.55

 .03

 .00

 .00

PRECIP

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

JANUARY 2021 MILLERTON LAKE DAILY OPERATIONS RUN DATE: February 1, 2021

IN LAKE

EVAPORATION

INCHES

C.F.S.

COMPUTED*

1000 ACRE-FEET

RELEASE - C.F.S. 

TOTALS -14.7 5,878 0 1,280 0 194 2.33 4.38

ACRE-FEET -14,713 11,659 0 2,539 0 385

COMMENTS:

* COMPUTED INFLOW IS THE SUM OF CHANGE IN STORAGE, RELEASES, PUMPING AND EVAPORATION.

SUMMARY

RELEASE (ACRE-FEET)

CANALS

FRIANT-KERN

MADERA

 2,539

 0 25,992

PRECIPITATION

THIS MONTH =

JULY 1, 2020 TO DATE = 6.43

 180.6

 23,453 4.38

CANALS

AT FRIANT

TOTAL RELEASES

OUTLET

 425

 424

 441

 450

 391

 416

 450

 433

 424

 424

 424

 424

 423

 423

 386

 371

 370

 370

 361

 345

 345

 345

 345

 345

 345

 345

 314

 300

 315

 325

 325

RIVER

 11,824

 23,453

RIVER

OCT 1, 2020 TO DATE = 6.43
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
 Washington, D.C. 20549
 FORM 8-K
 CURRENT REPORT
Pursuant to Section 13 OR 15(d) of The Securities Exchange Act of 1934
 Date of Report (Date of earliest event reported): June 23, 2011
 
 Wireless Ronin Technologies, Inc.
  Minnesota

1-33169

41-1967918(State or other jurisdiction
of incorporation)

(Commission File Number)

(IRS Employer Identification No.)
 5929 Baker Road, Suite 475
Minnetonka, Minnesota

55345(Address of principal executive offices)

(Zip Code)
 (952) 564-3500
 
 (Former name or former address, if changed since last report.)
  o

Written communications pursuant to Rule 425 under the Securities Act (17 CFR 230.425)o

Soliciting material pursuant to Rule 14a-12 under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.14a-12)o

Pre-commencement communications pursuant to Rule 14d-2(b) under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.14d-2(b))o

Pre-commencement communications pursuant to Rule 13e-4(c) under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.13e-4(c))




---



##### 



ITEM 5.02 DEPARTURE OF DIRECTORS OR CERTAIN OFFICERS; ELECTION OF DIRECTORS; APPOINTMENT OF CERTAIN
OFFICERS; COMPENSATORY ARRANGEMENTS OF CERTAIN OFFICERS.




---



##### 



ITEM 8.01 OTHER EVENTS.
  ITEM 9.01 FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND EXHIBITS.




---



##### 



SIGNATURES
  Date:  June 28, 2011
    Wireless Ronin Technologies, Inc.By
    /s/ Scott N. RossScott N. RossSenior Vice President, General Counsel and Secretary




---



##### 



EXHIBIT INDEX
 ExhibitNumber
    
    Description99
    
    
    Press release dated June 28, 2011.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 96-6294

JULIAN EDWARD ROCHESTER,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

BOBBY E. BUSCH, Director; LIEUTENANT SUMMEY;

DON BLACKWELL, Mr.; CINDY DOE, Ms.; OCONEE

COUNTY,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of

South Carolina, at Charleston. William B. Traxler, Jr., District

Judge. (CA-95-169-2-21-AJ)

Submitted: September 20, 1996 Decided: October 1, 1996

Before NIEMEYER, HAMILTON, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Julian Edward Rochester, Appellant Pro Se. William Henry Davidson,

II, John Thomas Lay, Jr., ELLIS, LAWHORNE, DAVIDSON & SIMS, P.A.,

Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying

relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1994) complaint. We have reviewed

the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible

error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district

court. Rochester v. Busch, No. CA-95-169-2-21-AJ (D.S.C. Jan. 22,

1996). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the

court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
**Exhibit 31.1****CERTIFICATIONS**I, Steven J. Malcolm, certify that:1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of Williams Partners L.P.;2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact oromit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstancesunder which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by thisreport;3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included inthis report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operationsand cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have: a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls andprocedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material informationrelating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us byothers within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is beingprepared;  b) [Intentionally omitted pursuant to SEC Release No. 34-47986];  c) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures andpresented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controlsand procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation;and  d) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’sfourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or isreasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting; and5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the auditcommittee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions): a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation ofinternal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affectthe registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and  b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who havea significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.     Date: March 3, 2006           /s/ Steven J. Malcolm     Steven J. Malcolm
**UN PUBLISHED** 
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

**No. 09**  **- 7309** 

CHRISTOPHER BERNARD JONES , Plaintiff

- Appellant ,

v.
SC DEPT OF CORRECTIONS; JON OZMINT; SC DEPT PROBATION PAROLE AND PARDON SERVICES; SAMUEL GLOVER; GREENVILLE TE CHNICAL COLLEGE, et al
. ; TIM RILEY, Warden, Tyger River Correctional Institution; ROBERT HAL MAUNEY, Warden, Northside and Livesay Correctional Institution; PEGGY ROGERS, Lieutenant at Tyger River; ROGER RABB, Casemanager at Tyger River; KAREN FOWLER, Case worker at Tyger River; B. LEWIS, Caseworker at Tyger River; BILLY HYATT; MARY H. MCCABE,
Defendants

- Appellees
.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina , at Columbia

. Patrick Michael Duffy, Senior District J udge. ( 3:07

- cv - 01876

- PMD )

Submitted : March 10, 2010 Decided: March 2 5 , 2010

Before NIEMEYER, MOTZ, and SHEDD , Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by un published per curiam opinion

. Christopher Bernard Jones, Appellant Pro Se. Andrew Todd Darwin, HOLCO MBE, BOMAR, GUNN & BRADFORD, PA, Spartanburg, South Carolina, for Appellees.2 Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.3 PER CURIAM: Christopher Bernard Jones seeks to ap peal the district court’s order accepting the recommendation o f the magistrate judge and dismissing Jones’ 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) action . We dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction because the notice of appeal was not timely filed. Parties are accorded thirty days after the entry of the district court’s final j udgment or order to note an appeal, Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(1)(A), unless the district court extends the appeal period under Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(5), or reopens the appeal period under Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(6). This appeal period is “mandatory and jurisdictio nal.” Browder v. Dir., Dep’t of
Corr. , 434 U.S. 257, 264 (1978) (quoting United States v. Robinson , 361 U.S. 220, 229 (1960)). The district court’s order was entered on the docket

on April 2, 2009 . Th e notice of appeal was filed on June 1,
2009 . Becau se Jones failed to file a timely notice of appeal or to obtain an extension or reopening of the appeal period within the time periods specified in Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(6) , *

* Although Jones stated in his notice of appeal that he did not receive notice of the entry of the district court’s final order until May 14, 2009, his notice of appeal falls outside of the seven

- day requirement in Rule 4(a)(6)(B) and therefore a reopening of the appeal period is not permitted. we dismiss the appeal. We deny Jones’ motion for appointment of4 counsel. We dispe nse with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional
process.
DISMISSED
### §10007. Suspension of assistance

#### (a) In general

The President is authorized to suspend the provision of assistance authorized under section 10003, 10004, 10005, or 10006 of this title to the Government of Sudan if the President determines that conditions in Sudan or the composition of the Government of Sudan changes such that it is no longer in the United States national interest to continue to provide such assistance.

#### (b) Report

Not later than 30 days after making a determination under subsection (a), the President shall submit to the appropriate congressional committees a report that describes—

(1) the political and security conditions in Sudan that led to such determination; and

(2) any planned diplomatic engagement to restart the provision of such assistance.

(Pub. L. 116–283, div. A, title XII, §1268, Jan. 1, 2021, 134 Stat. 3972.)
[DO NOT PUBLISH]

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

 FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT

 ________________________

 No. 10-11843 

Non-Argument Calendar

 ________________________

 D.C. Docket No. 3:09-cr-00090-LC-1

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

llllllllllllllllllll lPlaintiff-Appellee,

 versus

AARON JOSEPH BRUNSON,

lllllllllllllllllllll Defendant-Appellant.

________________________

 Appeal from the United States District Court

 for the Northern District of Florida

 ________________________

(July 27, 2012)

Before TJOFLAT, JORDAN and ANDERSON, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

Case: 10-11843 Date Filed: 07/27/2012 Page: 1 of 3 
Aaron Joseph Brunson appeals his conviction for being a felon in

possession of a firearm, in violation of 18 U.S.C. §§ 922(g)(1). He argues that,

because the stipulation he had entered into with the Government—that he was a

convicted felon—was not admitted into evidence and published to the jury at trial,

the jury had no evidence before it on which to find him guilty. Therefore, the

evidence was insufficient to support his conviction.

We review de novo whether there is sufficient evidence in the record to

support a jury’s verdict in a criminal trial. United States v. Jiminez, 564 F.3d

1280, 1284 (11th Cir. 2009). To obtain a conviction for being a felon in

possession of a firearm, the government must prove that (1) the defendant was a

convicted felon, (2) the defendant knowingly possessed a firearm, and (3) the

firearm was in or affecting interstate commerce. 18 U.S.C. § 922(g)(1); United

States v. Deleveaux, 205 F.3d 1292, 1296-97 (11th Cir. 2000). 

Brunson concedes that after the jury was selected, his lawyer and the

Assistant U. S. Attorney informed the District Court that they had entered into a

stipulation that Brunson had previously been convicted of a felony and that his

civil rights had not been restored. Brunson acknowledged the stipulation and the

court accepted it. By stipulating to felon status, a defendant waives the right to

require the Government prove his felon status. United States v. Hardin, 139 F.3d

2

Case: 10-11843 Date Filed: 07/27/2012 Page: 2 of 3 
813, 816 (11th Cir. 1998). 

AFFIRMED.

3

Case: 10-11843 Date Filed: 07/27/2012 Page: 3 of 3
### Part 1—Procurement

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Prior Provisions

A prior part 1, consisting of section 3861, related to cemeteries, prior to repeal by Pub. L. 104–201, div. C, title XXXV, §3546(a)(5), Sept. 23, 1996, 110 Stat. 2868.
Exhibit 5.1
 [Hogan Lovells US LLP Letterhead]
  
  Company Registration
Statement Common Shares Preferred Shares Depositary
Shares Warrants Rights Securities
  Board Action Declaration of Trust




---



##### 



Act




---



##### 








---



#####
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY HIGH

 68

 69

 66

 69

 70

 70

 69

 69

 67

 68

 77

 73

 73

 69

 69

 64

 75

 67

 69

 67

 68

 68

 66

 66

 71

 71

 71

 70

 71

 70

 68

 64

 64

 64

 64

 63

 63

 64

 64

 62

 62

 62

 62

 62

 59

 61

 61

 61

 62

 61

 61

 62

 62

 62

 63

 65

 63

 63

 62

 62

 63

 62

 65

 65

 65

 65

 66

 66

 65

 66

 65

 65

 67

 66

 66

 62

 64

 63

 65

 64

 63

 64

 64

 65

 64

 65

 67

 67

 65

 65

 67

 66

 64

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

JULY 2018 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: August 2, 2018

HIGH LOW MEAN

 77.4

 75.9

 76.6

 76.2

 76.6

 77.7

 78.3

 78.2

 77.7

 78.6

 78.5

 79.2

 78.5

 79.6

 79.6

 79.4

 79.3

 79.8

 80.4

 79.6

 79.8

 79.3

 79.8

 80.7

 80.4

 80.1

 79.6

 78.0

 75.4

 75.3

 76.4

 71.9

 72.1

 71.2

 71.2

 71.0

 72.4

 73.3

 72.8

 72.3

 72.7

 72.9

 74.0

 74.7

 74.0

 74.0

 74.3

 73.8

 73.6

 74.8

 74.9

 74.6

 74.3

 74.6

 74.6

 75.1

 74.6

 74.5

 73.5

 73.1

 71.0

 71.4

 74.4

 73.9

 73.8

 73.6

 73.6

 75.0

 75.6

 75.3

 74.9

 75.3

 75.5

 76.4

 76.4

 76.7

 76.7

 76.6

 76.4

 76.5

 77.4

 77.1

 76.9

 76.6

 77.1

 77.6

 77.6

 77.2

 76.8

 75.7

 74.3

 73.2

 73.8

HIGH LOW MEAN

 8.1

 8.3

 8.3

 8.4

 8.4

 8.5

 8.4

 8.4

 8.5

 8.5

 8.5

 8.4

 8.4

 8.3

 8.3

 8.3

 8.4

 8.4

 8.3

 8.3

 8.3

 8.4

 8.3

 8.2

 8.3

 8.3

 8.3

 8.5

 8.5

 8.7

 8.6

 7.7

 7.6

 7.7

 7.7

 7.8

 7.8

 7.7

 7.6

 7.7

 7.7

 7.7

 7.5

 7.6

 7.5

 7.5

 7.5

 7.5

 7.5

 7.4

 7.4

 7.5

 7.5

 7.5

 7.5

 7.4

 7.5

 7.6

 7.6

 7.7

 7.9

 7.9

 7.8

 7.9

 8.0

 8.0

 8.1

 8.1

 8.0

 8.0

 8.1

 8.0

 8.0

 7.9

 7.9

 7.9

 7.9

 7.8

 7.9

 7.9

 7.8

 7.8

 7.9

 7.9

 7.9

 7.8

 7.8

 7.9

 7.9

 8.0

 8.1

 8.3

 8.2

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

RIPON ON THE STANISLAUS RIVER

 ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS WATER TEMPERATURE, DEG DISSOLVED OXYZEN, PPM
### §624. Storage and handling regulations; violations; exemption of establishments subject to non-Federal jurisdiction

The Secretary may by regulations prescribe conditions under which carcasses, parts of carcasses, meat, and meat food products of cattle, sheep, swine, goats, horses, mules, or other equines, capable of use as human food, shall be stored or otherwise handled by any person, firm, or corporation engaged in the business of buying, selling, freezing, storing, or transporting, in or for commerce, or importing, such articles, whenever the Secretary deems such action necessary to assure that such articles will not be adulterated or misbranded when delivered to the consumer. Violation of any such regulation is prohibited. However, such regulations shall not apply to the storage or handling of such articles at any retail store or other establishment in any State or organized Territory that would be subject to this section only because of purchases in commerce, if the storage and handling of such articles at such establishment is regulated under the laws of the State or Territory in which such establishment is located, in a manner which the Secretary, after consultation with the appropriate advisory committee provided for in section 661 of this title, determines is adequate to effectuate the purposes of this section.

(Mar. 4, 1907, ch. 2907, title I, §24, as added Pub. L. 90–201, §13, Dec. 15, 1967, 81 Stat. 593.)
# C_2012064EN.01002502.xml

| 3.3.2012 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 64/25 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

3.3.2012

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 64/25

---

Corrigendum to Notice concerning undertakings offered in connection with the anti-dumping proceeding concerning imports of citric acid originating in the People's Republic of China: change of the address of a company

(
  Official Journal of the European Union C 3 of 6 January 2012
  )

Official Journal of the European Union C 3 of 6 January 2012

2012/C 64/17

On page 11:

for:

‘Changshen Street No 1567’

read:

‘Changsheng Street No 1567’.

---
A-AA+Skip to content

                  - Home
                  - Compendium Statistics
                  - Event
                  - Archives
                  - Glossary
                  - Help
                  - Contact
                  - Research on Disability

Annual Disability Statistics Compendium

              - Home /
              - Archives /
              - 2012 Compendium Statistics /
              - 2012 Time Trend Population Statistics /
              - 2012 3.9 Poverty Rate among Civilians Ages 16-64 by Disability Status and Year

## Table 3.9: Poverty Rate among Non-institutionalized Civilians Ages 16 to 64 by Disability Status and Year, 1980-2011

----

[1] Broad disability refers to the definition of disability used by the CPS-BMS and CPS-ASEC.  See the Glossary.[2] Either a broad disability and/or work limitation. 

----

 

----

#### 2012 Disability Compendium

                        - Home
                        - Compendium Statistics                           - Population and Prevelance
                          - Employment
                          - Time Trend Population Statistics
                          - Poverty
                          - Earnings
                          - Veterans
                          - Health Insurance Coverage
                          - Health
                          - Social Security Administration Programs
                          - Medicaid and Medicare
                          - Special Education
                          - Vocational Rehabilitation
                          - Federal Government Spending and Employment
                          - International Disability Statistics
                          - Population Statistics: Disability Type
                        - Event
                        - Archives                           - 2012 Compendium Statistics
                        - Glossary
                        - Help
                        - Contact
                        - Research on Disability

#### Funding for this project is made possible by:

 The Research and Training Center on Disability Statistics and Demographics (StatsRRTC), which is funded by the U.S. Department of Education, National Institute for Disability and Rehabilitation Research, under cooperative agreements H133B080012.

#### Stay Connected

**Institute on Disability**10 West Edge Drive, Suite 101Durham, NH 03824603.862.4320 | relay: 711 | [email protected]www.iod.unh.edu

© 2013. Institute on Disability.University of New Hampshire.
#### § 404.982 Extension of time to file action in Federal district court.

Any party to the Appeals Council's decision or denial of review, or to an expedited appeals process agreement, may request that the time for filing an action in a Federal district court be extended. The request must be in writing and it must give the reasons why the action was not filed within the stated time period. The request must be filed with the Appeals Council, or if it concerns an expedited appeals process agreement, with one of our offices. If you show that you had good cause for missing the deadline, the time period will be extended. To determine whether good cause exists, we use the standards explained in § 404.911.
#### § 404.1903 Negotiating totalization agreements.

An agreement shall be negotiated with the national government of the foreign country for the entire country. However, agreements may only be negotiated with foreign countries that have a social security system of general application in effect. The system shall be considered to be in effect if it is collecting social security taxes or paying social security benefits.
#### Center Capital Corp., Respondent, v. Dahlia Operating Corp. et al., Appellants, et al., Defendants.

Order unanimously affirmed, with $20 costs and disbursements. Do opinion. Present — Peek, P. J., Dore, Callahan, Yan Yoorhis and Shientag, JJ.
### Part I—General Provisions