Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 71 / Wednesday, April 13, 2011 / Notices 20709 

facilitated discussions with relevant 

stakeholder groups, practitioners, and 

researchers. In addition up to 9–12 

interviews with experts in the various 

aspects of the field will be conducted to 

obtain their reaction to the preliminary 

concept map generated by the 

brainstorming, sorting, and rating 

process and asked to provide 

information about what may be missing, 

need amplification, or to be interrelated 

in a different manner than on the 

preliminary concept map. Guiding 

questions and discussion prompts, 

derived from the concept mapping 

results, will be used to gather 

information from the respondents on the 

meaning and potential use of the 

concept mapping results. This input 

will be aggregated and linked to the 

emerging conceptual framework that 

will result in a better understanding of 

the complex interrelationships between 

policy, practice, and research elements 

in the field of elder justice. Thus, the 

challenges, and needs of practitioners 

on the front lines will inform the work 

of researchers, and the researchers’ 

findings will inform the work of policy 

makers and practitioners, and the policy 

makers will communicate with 

researchers and practitioners about what 

information thy need to properly inform 

policy. A single concept mapping 

process will provide an efficient means 

for managing participation while 

simultaneously integrating perspectives 

that are complementary and mutually 

informative. 

(5) An estimate of the total number of 

respondents and the amount of time 

estimated for an average respondent to 

respond: It is estimated that 750 

respondents total will participate in the 

concept mapping phase of this 

collection, and that 60 respondents total 

will participate in the facilitated 

discussions. The table below shows the 

estimated number of respondents for 

each portion of the collection: 

Task Participation 

targets 

Total task 

target 

Concept Mapping:.

Brainstorming .................................................................................................................................................... 750 750 

Sorting .............................................................................................................................................................. 250 250 

Rating ............................................................................................................................................................... 750 750 

Total group target ...................................................................................................................................... ........................ 750 

Facilitated discussion Participation 

targets 

Total 

target 

Policy maker group 1 ............................................................................................................................................... 10 10 

Policy maker group 2 ............................................................................................................................................... 10 10 

Practitioner group 3 ................................................................................................................................................. 10 10 

Practitioner group 4 ................................................................................................................................................. 10 10 

Researcher group 5 ................................................................................................................................................. 10 10 

Researcher group 6 ................................................................................................................................................. 10 10 

Total group target .................................................................................................................................................... 10 60 

Expert Interview ....................................................................................................................................................... 9–12 9–12 

The brainstorming task will take 

respondents 5–10 minutes to complete. 

The sorting task will take respondents 

approximately 30–60 minutes to 

complete. The rating task will take 

respondents approximately 30 minutes 

to complete. None of these tasks will 

require participants to complete in one 

sitting; rather, participants can return to 

work on task completion as often as 

they chose, until the task deadline. 

Respondents will have approximately 

4 weeks to brainstorm and 

approximately 6 weeks to sort and rate. 

Facilitated discussions will require 

approximately 4 hours of respondents’ 

time. 

Expert interview will require no more 

than 90 minutes of respondents’ time. 

(6) An estimate of the total public 

burden (in hours) associated with the 

collection: There are an estimated 948 

total public burden hours associated 

with this collection. This is planned to 

be a one-time data collection. 

If additional information is required 

contact: Lynn Murray, Department 

Clearance Officer, Policy and Planning 

Staff, Justice Management Division, U.S. 

Department of Justice, Two Constitution 

Square, 145 N Street, NE., Room 2E– 

808, Washington, DC 20530. 

Dated: April 7, 2011. 

Lynn Murray, 

Department Clearance Officer, PRA, U.S. 

Department of Justice. 

[FR Doc. 2011–8788 Filed 4–12–11; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4410–12–P 

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE 

Notice of Lodging of Consent Decree 

Under the Comprehensive 

Environmental Response, 

Compensation and Liability Act 

(CERCLA) 

Consistent with Section 122(d)(2) of 

CERCLA, 42 U.S.C. 9622(d)(2), and 28 

CFR 50.7, notice is hereby given that on 

April 8, 2011, the proposed Consent 

Decree in United States v. John 

Williams, et al, Civil Action No. 11– 

00689–PHX–MEA, was lodged with the 

United States District Court for the 

District of Arizona. The proposed 

Consent Decree resolves the United 

States’ claims under Section 107(a) of 

the Comprehensive Environmental 

Response, Compensation, and Liability 

Act, 42 U.S.C. 9607(a), against John M. 

Williams, Jr., Arizona Public Service 

Co., the Salt River Project, Public 

Service Company of New Mexico, and 

El Paso Electric Co. relating to response 

costs incurred and to be incurred by the 

United States Environmental Protection 

Agency (‘‘EPA’’) at or from a Site known 

as the Gila River Indian Reservation 

Removal Site, also referred to as the Gila 

River Boundary Site, located in 

Maricopa County, Arizona. The consent 

decree also resolves potential CERCLA 

counterclaims against the United States 

Department of the Interior. 

Under the terms of the proposed 

consent decree, John M. Williams, Jr., 

Arizona Public Service Co., the Salt 

River Project, Public Service Company 

of New Mexico, El Paso Electric Co., and 

the United States Department of Interior 

will reimburse EPA in the amount of 

$462,500. EPA’s total response costs are 

approximately $1 million. 

The Department of Justice will receive 

for a period of thirty (30) days from the 

mstockstill on DSKH9S0YB1PROD with NOTICES

20710 Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 71 / Wednesday, April 13, 2011 / Notices 

date of this publication comments 

relating to the Consent Decree. 

Comments should be addressed to the 

Assistant Attorney General, 

Environment and Natural Resources 

Division, and either e-mailed to 

pubcomment-ees.enrd@usdoj.gov or 

mailed to P.O. Box 7611, U.S. 

Department of Justice, Washington, DC 

20044–7611, and should refer to United 

States of America v. John Williams, Jr., 

Civil Action No. 11–00689–PHX–MEA 

(U.S.D.C. D. AZ) (DOJ Ref. No. 90–11– 

3–09420). The Consent Decree may be 

examined at U.S. Environmental 

Protection Agency, Office of Regional 

Counsel, EPA IX at 75 Hawthorne 

Street, San Francisco, California 94105. 

During the public comment period, the 

Consent Decree may also be examined 

on the following Department of Justice 

Web site, http://www.usdoj.gov/enrd/ 

Consent_Decrees.html. A copy of the 

Consent Decree may also be obtained by 

mail from the Consent Decree Library, 

U.S. Department of Justice, P.O. Box 

7611, Washington, DC 20044–7611 or by 

faxing or e-mailing a request to Tonia 

Fleetwood (tonia.fleetwood@usdoj.gov), 

fax no. (202) 514–0097, phone 

confirmation number (202) 514–1547. In 

requesting a copy from the Consent 

Decree Library, please enclose a check 

in the amount of $7.75 (25 cents per 

page reproduction cost) payable to the 

U.S. Treasury or, if by e-mail or fax, 

forward a check in that amount to the 

Consent Decree Library at the stated 

address. 

Henry Friedman, 

Assistant Section Chief, Environmental 

Enforcement Section, Environment and 

Natural Resources Division. 

[FR Doc. 2011–8912 Filed 4–12–11; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4410–15–P 

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE 

Drug Enforcement Administration 

[OMB Number 1117–0010] 

Agency Information Collection 

Activities: Proposed Collection; 

Comments Requested: U.S. Official 

Order Forms for Schedule I and II 

Controlled Substances (Accountable 

Forms); Order Form Requisition DEA 

Form 222, 222a, Controlled Substances 

Order System 

ACTION: 60-Day Notice of Information 

Collection Under Review. 

The Department of Justice (DOJ), Drug 

Enforcement Administration (DEA), will 

be submitting the following information 

collection request to the Office of 

Management and Budget (OMB) for 

review and approval in accordance with 

the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995. 

The proposed information collection is 

published to obtain comments from the 

public and affected agencies. Comments 

are encouraged and will be accepted 

until June 13, 2011. This process is 

conducted in accordance with 5 CFR 

1320.10. 

If you have comments, especially on 

the estimated public burden or 

associated response time, suggestions, 

or need a copy of the proposed 

information collection instrument with 

instructions or additional information, 

please contact Cathy A. Gallagher, 

Acting Chief, Liaison and Policy 

Section, Office of Diversion Control, 

Drug Enforcement Administration, 8701 

Morrissette Drive, Springfield, VA 

22152; (202) 307–7297. 

Written comments concerning this 

information collection should be sent to 

the Office of Information and Regulatory 

Affairs, Office of Management and 

Budget, Attn: DOJ Desk Officer. The best 

way to ensure your comments are 

received is to e-mail them to 

oira_submission@omb.eop.gov or fax 

them to 202–395–7285. All comments 

should reference the 8 digit OMB 

number for the collection or the title of 

the collection. If you have questions 

concerning the collection, please call 

Cathy A. Gallagher at 202–307–7297 or 

the DOJ Desk Officer at 202–395–3176. 

Written comments and suggestions 

from the public and affected agencies 

concerning the proposed collection of 

information are encouraged. Your 

comments should address one or more 

of the following four points: 

• Evaluate whether the proposed 

collection of information is necessary 

for the proper performance of the 

functions of the agency, including 

whether the information will have 

practical utility; 

• Evaluate the accuracy of the 

agencies estimate of the burden of the 

proposed collection of information, 

including the validity of the 

methodology and assumptions used; 

• Enhance the quality, utility, and 

clarity of the information to be 

collected; and 

• Minimize the burden of the 

collection of information on those who 

are to respond, including through the 

use of appropriate automated, 

electronic, mechanical, or other 

technological collection techniques or 

other forms of information technology, 

e.g., permitting electronic submission of 

responses. 

Overview of information collection 

1117–0010: 

(1) Type of Information Collection: 

Extension of a currently approved 

collection. 

(2) Title of the Form/Collection: U.S. 

Official Order Forms for Schedule I and 

II Controlled Substances (Accountable 

Forms); Order Form Requisition. 

(3) Agency form number, if any, and 

the applicable component of the 

Department of Justice sponsoring the 

collection: 

Form Number: DEA Forms 222 and 

222a. 

Component: Office of Diversion 

Control, Drug Enforcement 

Administration, Department of Justice. 

(4) Affected public who will be asked 

or required to respond, as well as a brief 

abstract: 

Primary: Business or other for-profit. 

Other: Not-for-profit; State, local, or 

tribal government. 

Abstract: DEA–222 is used to transfer 

or purchase Schedule I and II controlled 

substances and data are needed to 

provide an audit of transfer and 

purchase. DEA–222a Requisition Form 

is used to obtain the DEA–222 Order 

Form. Persons may also digitally sign 

and transmit orders for controlled 

substances electronically, using a digital 

certificate. Orders for Schedule I and II 

controlled substances are archived and 

transmitted to DEA. 

(5) An estimate of the total number of 

respondents and the amount of time 

estimated for an average respondent to 

respond: DEA estimates that 109,632 

registrants participate in this 

information collection, taking an 

estimated 17.33 hours per registrant 

annually. 

(6) An estimate of the total public 

burden (in hours) associated with the 

collection: It is estimated that there are 

1,898,970 annual burden hours 

associated with this collection. 

If additional information is required 

contact: Lynn Murray, Department 

Clearance Officer, Policy and Planning 

Staff, Justice Management Division, U.S. 

Department of Justice, Two Constitution 

Square, 145 N Street, NE., Room 2E– 

808, Washington, DC 20530. 

Dated: April 7, 2011. 

Lynn Murray, 

Department Clearance Officer, PRA, U.S. 

Department of Justice. 

[FR Doc. 2011–8748 Filed 4–12–11; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4410–09–P 

mstockstill on DSKH9S0YB1PROD with NOTICES