alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

DAY HIGH

 11,595

 11,135

 10,932

 11,510

 11,867

 11,668

 11,560

 13,025

 14,154

 15,170

 13,806

 15,097

 16,108

 16,835

 16,221

 15,577

 13,954

 13,444

 12,771

 13,933

 14,890

 15,849

 13,761

 15,545

 15,003

 14,229

 13,681

 14,178

 16,138

 13,396

 4,674

 3,966

 4,497

 4,171

 4,463

 5,262

 4,850

 4,700

 6,637

 6,366

 6,545

 5,679

 5,563

 5,858

 6,040

 5,994

 4,939

 5,474

 4,766

 5,565

 5,607

 6,922

 6,569

 6,565

 5,056

 5,911

 6,041

 5,881

 5,909

 6,166

 8,010

 7,839

 7,806

 8,220

 8,800

 8,681

 8,246

 9,216

 9,994

 10,288

 9,452

 9,490

 10,419

 10,667

 10,474

 9,953

 10,000

 9,284

 9,017

 9,488

 10,295

 10,798

 9,795

 10,077

 10,066

 9,981

 10,012

 9,632

 11,110

 10,026

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

NOVEMBER 2000 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: December 11, 2000

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

PITTSBURG TOP ON THE SACRAMENTO RIVER
# Third District Court of Appeal State of Florida Opinion filed March 29, 2023. Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.

________________ No. 3D21-2269 Lower Tribunal No. 19-3489

________________ Javarius Hendrix, Appellant,
vs. Wal-Mart Stores East, LP, Appellee. An Appeal from the Circuit Court for Miami-Dade County, Mark Blumstein, Judge. Chad Barr Law, and Chad A. Barr (Altamonte Springs), for appellant. Fasi & DiBello, P.A., and Frantz Destin Jr. and Darin DiBello, for appellee. Before FERNANDEZ, C.J., and EMAS and SCALES, JJ. PER CURIAM.2

Affirmed. See § 90.403, Fla. Stat. (2021) (“Relevant evidence is inadmissible if its probative value is substantially outweighed by the danger of unfair prejudice, confusion of issues, misleading the jury, or needless presentation of cumulative evidence.”); Trees v. K-Mart Corp., 467 So. 2d 401, 403 (Fla. 4th DCA 1985) (“The determination of relevancy is within the discretion of the trial court. Where a trial court has weighed probative value against prejudicial impact before reaching its decision to admit or exclude evidence, an appellate court will not overturn that decision absent a clear abuse of discretion.”) (citation omitted); Sims v. Brown, 574 So. 2d 131, 133 (Fla. 1991) (citing Trees with approval, observing that “[t]he weighing of relevance versus prejudice or confusion is best performed by the trial judge who is present and best able to compare the two”).
#### § 411.582 Can a State VR agency receive payment under the cost reimbursement payment system if a continuous 9-month period of substantial gainful activity is completed after the ticket is assigned to an EN?

Yes. If a State VR agency provides services to a beneficiary under 34 CFR part 361, and elects payment under the cost reimbursement payment system under subpart V of part 404 (or subpart V of part 416) of this chapter, the State VR agency can receive payment under the cost reimbursement payment system for services provided to the beneficiary if all the requirements under subpart V of part 404 (or subpart V of part 416) of this chapter and § 411.585 are met even when these requirements are met after the ticket has been assigned to the EN. The EN can be paid during this period in accordance with §§ 411.525 and 411.535.

[73 FR 29351, May 20, 2008]
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY HIGH

 8,400

 8,004

 7,135

 9,124

 8,344

 9,903

 9,756

 9,849

 11,622

 10,508

 9,723

 10,011

 9,503

 8,213

 7,468

 7,032

 7,990

 9,899

 11,659

 11,276

 10,686

 10,835

 10,423

 9,574

 9,314

 9,860

 10,068

 8,445

 9,279

 7,781

 7,282

 1,837

 1,919

 1,780

 1,656

 1,762

 1,487

 1,559

 1,549

 1,594

 1,585

 1,574

 1,636

 2,041

 2,393

 2,229

 2,354

 2,986

 3,629

 3,672

 3,521

 3,659

 3,365

 3,028

 3,255

 3,338

 3,700

 3,300

 3,210

 3,307

 3,624

 3,497

 4,766

 4,702

 4,182

 4,327

 3,855

 4,291

 5,013

 5,214

 5,169

 5,288

 5,116

 5,142

 5,205

 5,140

 4,919

 4,819

 5,002

 5,555

 5,995

 6,087

 6,665

 6,490

 6,361

 6,398

 6,222

 6,507

 6,274

 5,856

 6,074

 5,763

 5,458

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

AUGUST 2003 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: September 2, 2003

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

PORT CHICAGO TOP IN SUISUN BAY
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

DAY HIGH

 160

 177

 225

 187

 155

 150

 175

 151

 142

 139

 138

 143

 152

 150

 148

 143

 140

 144

 149

 170

 190

 752

 1,705

 1,539

 1,439

 1,455

 1,489

 814

 154

 153

 155

 147

 145

 141

 141

 135

 125

 122

 128

 128

 130

 131

 132

 121

 127

 137

 139

 142

 149

 163

 167

 192

 221

 222

 237

 270

 157

 158

 169

 160

 151

 146

 150

 145

 137

 133

 133

 134

 138

 137

 138

 136

 137

 140

 143

 151

 161

 236

 373

 418

 470

 458

 598

 490

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

FEBRUARY 2006 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: March 7, 2006

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

PITTSBURG TOP ON THE SACRAMENTO RIVER
# C_2012270EN.01000401.xml

| 7.9.2012 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 270/4 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

7.9.2012

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 270/4

---

Notice concerning a request under Article 30 of Directive 2004/17/EC

Request from a contracting entity

2012/C 270/04

On 17 August 2012, the Commission received a request under Article 30(5) of Directive 2004/17/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 31 March 2004 coordinating the procurement procedures of entities operating in the water, energy, transport and postal services sectors. The first working day following receipt of the request is 20 August 2012.

That request, from Noble Energy International Ltd, concerns exploration for oil and gas in Cyprus. Article 30 provides that Directive 2004/17/EC does not apply where the activity is directly exposed to competition on markets to which access is not restricted. These conditions are evaluated solely for the purposes of Directive 2004/17/EC and are without prejudice to the application of competition rules.

The Commission has a period of three months, as from the working day referred to above, within which to take a decision on the request. The period therefore ends on 20 November 2012.

That period may be extended by three months. Notice of any such extension must be published.

In accordance with the second subparagraph of Article 30(6), further requests concerning exploration for and extraction of oil and gas in Cyprus submitted before the expiry of the period opened in respect of this request shall not be considered as new procedures and shall be treated in the context of this request.

---
Exhibit 99.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Consolidated Resources Health Care
Fund II (the "Partnership") on Form 10-Q for the period ending March 31, 2000 as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
"Report"), I, John F. McMullan, Principal Executive Officer and Chief Financial
Officer of the Partnership, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss.1350, as adopted
pursuant to ss.906 of the Sarbanes- Oxley Act of 2002, that:

         (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and result of the operations of the
Partnership.

Date:August 26, 2002    By:  /s/ John F. McMullan
                            --------------------------------------
                            John F. McMullan
                            Chief Financial Officer (chief executive and chief
                            financial officer of the Partnership)
###### Editorial Note on Part 478

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 478 appear by T.D. ATF-411, 64 FR 17291, Apr. 9, 1999, T.D. ATF-487, 68 FR 3750, Jan. 24, 2003, and ATF-11F, 73 FR 57240, Oct. 2, 2008.

#### § 478.74 Request for hearing after notice of suspension, revocation, or imposition of civil fine.

If a licensee desires a hearing after receipt of a notice of suspension or revocation of a license, or imposition of a civil fine, the licensee shall file a request, in duplicate, with the Director of Industry Operations within 15 days after receipt of the notice of suspension or revocation of a license, or imposition of a civil fine. On receipt of such request, the Director of Industry Operations shall, as expeditiously as possible, make necessary arrangements for the hearing and advise the licensee of the date, time, location and the name of the officer before whom the hearing will be held. Such notification shall be made no less than 10 days in advance of the date set for the hearing. On conclusion of the hearing and consideration of all the relevant presentations made by the licensee or the licensee's representative, the Director shall render a decision and shall prepare a brief summary of the findings and conclusions on which the decision is based. If the decision is that the license should be revoked, or, in actions under 18 U.S.C. 922(t)(5) or 924(p), that the license should be revoked or suspended, or that a civil fine should be imposed, a certified copy of the summary shall be furnished to the licensee with the final notice of revocation, suspension, or imposition of a civil fine on ATF Form 5300.13. If the decision is that the license should not be revoked, or in actions under 18 U.S.C. 922(t)(5) or 924(p), that the license should not be revoked or suspended, and a civil fine should not be imposed, the licensee shall be notified in writing. During the hearing the licensee will have the opportunity to submit facts and arguments for review and consideration; offers of settlement will not be entertained at the hearing but may be made before or after the hearing.

[T.D. ATF-415, 63 FR 58278, Oct. 29, 1998, as amended by ATF-27P, 74 FR 1878, Jan. 14, 2009; ATF 2013R-9F, 79 FR 46692, Aug. 11, 2014; ATF 2008R-15P, 81 FR 32235, May 23, 2016]
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the amended Annual
Report of Cereplast, Inc. (the registrant) on Form 10-K/A for the period ending December 31, 2011 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Frederic Scheer, Chairman and
Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Report
fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained
in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.



|                      |  |  |  |  |  |                                                                                   
|--------------------- |  |  |  |  |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|Dated: April 30, 2012 |  |  |  |  |  | By: /s/ Frederic Scheer                                                           
|                      |  |  |  |  |  | Frederic Scheer Chairman
and Chief Executive Officer (Principal Executive Officer)
(No. 6644

#### IBM Corporation, Claimant, *vs.*State of Illinois, Department of Mental Health, Respondent.

*Opinion filed December 13, 1972.*

IBM Corporation, Claimant, pro se.

William J. Scott, Attorney General; Saul R. Wexler, Assistant Attorney General, for Respondent.

Per Curiam.
# C_2012102EN.01001101.xml

| 5.4.2012 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 102/11 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

5.4.2012

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 102/11

---

Legislative proposals adopted by the Commission

2012/C 102/03

| Document | Part | Date | Title |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| COM(2011) 739 | | 9.11.2011 | Amended proposal for a Council Decision on the system of own resources of the European Union |
| COM(2011) 740 | | 9.11.2011 | Amended proposal for a Council Regulation laying down implementing measures for the system of own resources of the European Union |
| COM(2011) 742 | | 9.11.2011 | Amended proposal for a Council Regulation on the methods and procedure for making available the traditional and GNI-based own resources and on the measures to meet cash requirements (recast) |
| COM(2011) 832 | | 25.11.2011 | Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament pursuant to Article 294(6) of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union concerning the Position of the Council on the adoption of a Directive of the European Parliament and of the Council on a single application procedure for a single permit for third-country nationals to reside and work in the territory of a Member State and on a common set of rights for third-country workers legally residing in a Member State |

Document

Part

Date

Title

COM(2011) 739

9.11.2011

Amended proposal for a Council Decision on the system of own resources of the European Union

COM(2011) 740

9.11.2011

Amended proposal for a Council Regulation laying down implementing measures for the system of own resources of the European Union

COM(2011) 742

9.11.2011

Amended proposal for a Council Regulation on the methods and procedure for making available the traditional and GNI-based own resources and on the measures to meet cash requirements (recast)

COM(2011) 832

25.11.2011

Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament pursuant to Article 294(6) of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union concerning the Position of the Council on the adoption of a Directive of the European Parliament and of the Council on a single application procedure for a single permit for third-country nationals to reside and work in the territory of a Member State and on a common set of rights for third-country workers legally residing in a Member State

These texts are available on EUR-Lex: http://eur-lex.europa.eu

---
§ 31.156 Records of disposition. ( a ) *Information required.* Every wholesale dealer in liquors must prepare a daily record of the physical disposition of each individual lot of distilled spirits. This record must show, at a minimum, the following: ( 1 ) Name and address of consignee;
( 2 ) Date of disposition, including date of discovery in the case of casualty, theft or recorded inventory losses;
( 3 ) Brand name;
( 4 ) Kind of spirits. However, this may be omitted if the dealer keeps available for inspection a separate list or record identifying “kind” with the brand name;
( 5 ) Number of packages, if any, and number of cases by size of bottle; and
( 6 ) Package identification numbers of containers of alcohol repackaged for industrial use pursuant to subpart L of this part.
( b ) *Form of record.* The record required by paragraph (a) of this section must be part of the accounting system and must consist of wholesale dealer's invoices (or, if those invoices are not available at the time the spirits are removed, memorandum shipping records prepared at the time of removal of the distilled spirits, including date of discovery in the case of casualty, theft or recorded inventory losses).
(26 U.S.C. 5121)
(Approved by the Office of Management and Budget under control number 1513-0065)
### §§1016, 1017. Repealed. Pub. L. 96–465, title II, §2205(1), Oct. 17, 1980, 94 Stat. 2159

Section 1016, acts Aug. 13, 1946, ch. 957, title VI, §641, 60 Stat. 1017; Sept. 8, 1960, Pub. L. 86–723, §27, 74 Stat. 837, related to class promotion of staff personnel.

Section 1017, acts Aug. 13, 1946, ch. 957, title VI, §642, 60 Stat. 1017; Sept. 8, 1960, Pub. L. 86–723, §28, 74 Stat. 837; Oct. 11, 1962, Pub. L. 87–793, §905, 76 Stat. 863, related to within-class salary increases for staff officers or employees.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date of Repeal

Repeal effective Feb. 15, 1981, except as otherwise provided, see section 2403 of Pub. L. 96–465, set out as an Effective Date note under section 3901 of this title.
# C_2012117EN.01000501.xml

| 21.4.2012 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 117/5 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

21.4.2012

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 117/5

---

Publication pursuant to Directive 2001/24/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council on the reorganisation and winding-up of credit institutions

2012/C 117/04

The High Court of Ireland

The High Court of Ireland

IN THE MATTER OF IRISH LIFE AND PERMANENT PLC (‘ILP’) AND IN THE MATTER OF THE CREDIT INSTITUTIONS (STABILISATION) ACT 2010

IN THE MATTER OF IRISH LIFE AND PERMANENT PLC (‘ILP’) AND IN THE MATTER OF THE CREDIT INSTITUTIONS (STABILISATION) ACT 2010

The High Court of Ireland did on 28 March 2012 make a direction order pursuant to Section 9 of the Credit Institutions (Stabilisation) Act 2010 as amended by the Central Bank and Credit Institutions (Resolution) Act 2011, (the ‘Act’), in the following terms:

Directing ILP, inter alia, to take certain steps for the purpose of effecting the sale of Irish Life Limited (‘Irish Life’), a wholly owned subsidiary of ILP, and its subsidiaries to the Minister for Finance of Ireland (the ‘Minister’) as part of the recapitalisation of ILP; such steps include, but are not limited to, the entering into of a share purchase agreement with the Minister in respect of the entire issued share capital of Irish Life and other steps to allow for the separation of ILP’s assurance and banking businesses including completing the formation of such structures as may be necessary to facilitate such separation and entering into such agreement(s) as may be necessary to facilitate such separation.

The Court did declare, inter alia, that the direction order and each and every part of it insofar as it is addressed to and is made in respect of ILP is a reorganisation measure for the purposes of Directive 2001/24/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 4 April 2001.

Pursuant to Section 11 of the Act, an application may be made for the setting aside of the direction order, on the conditions set out therein, to the High Court of Ireland at the Four Courts, Inns Quay, Dublin 7, Ireland not later than 14 days after 30 March 2012, being the date of publication of the direction order pursuant to Section 9A(1)(b) of the Act. Pursuant to Section 64(2) of the Act, no appeal lies from the direction order to the Supreme Court without leave of the High Court.

Full copies of the direction order are available from the Central Office of the High Court by e-mail to listroomhighcourt@courts.ie

---
EXHIBIT 11
                              BellSouth Corporation
                        Computation of Earnings Per Share

                                 For the Three Month      For the Nine Month
                                     Period Ended           Period Ended
                                     September 30,           September 30,
                                   1999        1998        1999        1998
Basic Earnings Per Common Share:

Net Income                      $   994     $   814       $ 2,395     $ 2,524

Weighted average shares
Outstanding                       1,885       1,965         1,903       1,975

Earnings Per Common Share       $   .53     $   .41       $  1.26    $   1.28

<PAGE>

                                                                      EXHIBIT 11
                              BellSouth Corporation
                  Computation of Earnings Per Share (continued)

                                  For the Three Month       For the Nine Month
                                       Period Ended           Period Ended
                                      September 30,          September 30,
                                    1999        1998        1999         1998
Diluted Earnings Per Common Share:

Net Income                       $   994     $   814      $ 2,395      $ 2,524

Weighted average shares
Outstanding                        1,885       1,965         1,903       1,975

Incremental shares from
Assumed exercise of
stock options and payment of
performance share awards              19          14           18           12

Total Shares                       1,904       1,979         1,921       1,987

Earnings Per Common Share        $   .52     $   .41       $  1.25     $  1.27
Exhibit 32.1

Certification pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350 as Adopted Pursuant to Section 906

of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

Each of the undersigned officers of Transcontinental Realty Investors, Inc., a Nevada corporation (the
Company) hereby certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 that:



| | (i) | The Companys Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the six months ended June 30, 2009, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (ii) | The information contained in the Companys Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the six months ended June 30, 2009, fairly presents in all material respects, the financial
condition and results of operations of the Company, at and for the periods indicated.
| | ---- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                      |  |  |  |                                         |  |                                                                                    
|--------------------- |  |  |  | --------------------------------------- |  | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                      |  |  |  | TRANSCONTINENTAL REALTY INVESTORS, INC.
|                      |  |  | 
|Date: August 14, 2009 |  |  |  | By:                                     |  | /s/ Daniel J. Moos                                                                 
|                      |  |  |  |                                         |  | Daniel J. Moos                                                                     
|                      |  |  |  |                                         |  | President and Chief Operating Officer (Principal
Executive Officer)                
|                      |  |  | 
|Date: August 14, 2009 |  |  |  | By:                                     |  | /s/ Gene S. Bertcher                                                               
|                      |  |  |  |                                         |  | Gene S. Bertcher                                                                   
|                      |  |  |  |                                         |  | Executive Vice President and Chief Accounting Officer (Principal Financial Officer)