alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<CIK> 0000732814
<NAME> APPALACHIAN OIL AND GAS COMPANY, INC.
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1997
<CASH>                                          27,094
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   19,844
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                46,938
<PP&E>                                         466,758
<DEPRECIATION>                                 334,933
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 178,763
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        31,358
<OTHER-SE>                                     147,405
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   178,763
<SALES>                                         13,625
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                13,947
<CGS>                                            7,445
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                18,276
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (11,774)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (11,774)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (11,774)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .00
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
CERTIFICATIONS PURSUANT TO THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906

OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





I, Robert Hodgkinson, Chief Executive Officer of Dejour Enterprises Ltd. (the Company) do hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge:



1.

This Annual Report on Form 20-F of the Company for the period ended December 31, 2005, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the report), fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



2.

The information contained in the report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





Date: July 14, 2006





/s/  Robert Hodgkinson

Robert Hodgkinson,

Chief Executive Officer













#
### §694. Authorization of appropriations

Annual appropriations of the sum of $3,000,000 from the general fund of the Treasury are authorized for the expenses of the inspection of cattle, sheep, swine, and goats and the meat and meat food products thereof which enter into interstate or foreign commerce and for all expenses necessary to carry into effect the provisions of this Act relating to meat inspection, including rent and the employment of labor in Washington and elsewhere, for each year, and in addition there is authorized to be appropriated such other sums as may be necessary in the enforcement of the meat inspection laws.

(June 30, 1906, ch. 3913, 34 Stat. 679; June 26, 1934, ch. 756, §2, 48 Stat. 1225.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

This Act, referred to in text, is act June 30, 1906, ch. 3913, 34 Stat. 669, which made appropriations for the Department of Agriculture for the fiscal year ending June 30, 1907.

#### Codification

Act June 26, 1934, ch. 756, §2(a), 48 Stat. 1225, which was classified to section 725a of former Title 31, Money and Finance, provided for the repeal, effective July 1, 1935, of the permanent appropriations under the appropriations titles listed in section 2(b) of such Act, and further provided that such portions of any Acts as made permanent appropriations to be expended under such accounts were amended so as to authorize, in lieu thereof, annual appropriations from the general fund of the Treasury in identical terms and in such amounts as were provided by the laws providing such permanent appropriations. The text of section 2(b)(3) of such Act provides as follows: "Meat inspection, Bureau of Animal Industry (fiscal year) (3–114)." Section 2(a) of such Act also authorized to be appropriated such other sums as necessary in the enforcement of the meat inspection laws. See 1934 Amendment note below.

Section was not enacted as part of the Federal Meat Inspection Act which is classified to subchapters I to IV–A of this chapter.

Section was formerly classified to section 95 of this title.

#### Amendments

1934—Act June 26, 1934, substituted "Annual appropriations of the sum of $3,000,000 from the general fund of the Treasury are authorized" for "There is permanently appropriated, out of any money in the Treasury not otherwise appropriated, the sum of $3,000,000," and inserted before period at end ", and in addition there is authorized to be appropriated such other sums as may be necessary in the enforcement of the meat inspection laws".

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date of 1934 Amendment

Act June 26, 1934, ch. 756, §2(a), 48 Stat. 1225, provided that the permanent appropriations under the appropriations titles listed in section 2(b) of such Act were repealed, effective July 1, 1935.
(No. 6385

#### Nicholas G. Parise and Patrick McClatchey, Claimants, *vs.*State of Illinois, Department of General Services, Respondent.

*Opinion filed November 3, 1972.*

Leroy A. Garr, Attorney for Claimants.

William J. Scott, Attorney General; Saul R. Wexler, Assistant Attorney General, for Respondent.

Perlin, C.J.
**Exhibit 32**

 

**Statement Required by 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to**

**Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**

 

This certificate is being delivered pursuant to the requirements of Section 1350 of Chapter 63 (Mail Fraud) of Title 18 (Crimes and Criminal Procedures) of the United States Code and shall not be relied on by any other person for any other purpose.

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of BellSouth Corporation (the “Company”) for the quarter ended September 30, 2005, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), the undersigned, F. Duane Ackerman, Chairman of the Board, Chief Executive Officer and President of the Company, and Ronald M. Dykes, Chief Financial Officer, of the Company, certify that
|   | **•** | the Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and  |
|--------|------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   | **•** | information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. |
|--------|------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 
| /s/ F. Duane Ackerman |
|-----------------------|
| F. Duane Ackerman     |  
 

November 1, 2005

 

                

/s/ Ronald M. Dykes

Ronald M. Dykes

 
 

November 1, 2005

 

                

 

 

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to BellSouth Corporation and will be retained by BellSouth Corporation and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

 

 

 

  |
§ 355.14 Separation of functions. ( a ) The investigating official, the reviewing official, and any employee or agent of the authority who takes part in investigating, preparing, or presenting a particular case may not, in such case or a factually related case— ( 1 ) Participate in the hearing as the ALJ;
( 2 ) Participate or advise in the initial decision or the review of the initial decision by the authority head, except as a witness or a representative in public proceedings; or
( 3 ) Make the collection of penalties and assessments under 31 U.S.C. 3806.
( b ) The ALJ shall not be responsible to, or subject to the supervision or direction of the investigating official or the reviewing official.
( c ) Except as provided in paragraph (a) of this section, the representative for the Government may be employed anywhere in the authority, including in the offices of either the investigating official or the reviewing official.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY HIGH

 145

 146

 146

 145

 147

 148

 143

 142

 140

 140

 137

 213

 175

 140

 151

 162

 199

 252

 174

 145

 136

 133

 136

 138

 138

 142

 140

 141

 143

 146

 148

 135

 137

 140

 139

 136

 137

 133

 131

 131

 128

 129

 130

 133

 132

 130

 127

 128

 128

 125

 123

 118

 122

 124

 126

 124

 127

 131

 133

 133

 134

 136

 140

 142

 143

 143

 142

 141

 140

 140

 137

 135

 133

 149

 148

 136

 135

 134

 140

 150

 137

 131

 127

 126

 127

 129

 130

 133

 136

 137

 138

 138

 140

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

MAY 2011 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: July 12, 2011

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

PITTSBURG BOTTOM ON THE SACRAMENTO RIVER
# C_2012302EN.01001402.xml

| 6.10.2012 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 302/14 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

6.10.2012

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 302/14

---

Information communicated by Member States regarding closure of fisheries

2012/C 302/11

In accordance with Article 35(3) of Council Regulation (EC) No 1224/2009 of 20 November 2009 establishing a Community control system for ensuring compliance with the rules of the common fisheries policy (1), a decision has been taken to close the fishery as set down in the following table:

1

| Date and time of closure | 17.9.2012 |
| --- | --- |
| Duration | 17.9.2012-31.12.2012 |
| Member State | Lithuania |
| Stock or group of stocks | RED/N3M |
| Species | Redfish (Sebastes spp.) |
| Zone | NAFO 3M |
| Type(s) of fishing vessels | — |
| Reference number | FS52TQ44 |

Date and time of closure

17.9.2012

Duration

17.9.2012-31.12.2012

Member State

Lithuania

Stock or group of stocks

RED/N3M

Species

Redfish (Sebastes spp.)

Sebastes

Zone

NAFO 3M

Type(s) of fishing vessels

—

Reference number

FS52TQ44

---

(1)  OJ L 343, 22.12.2009, p. 1.

1

---
#### Joseph Russo, Respondent, v. Franklin T. Birdsall et al., Individually and as Copartners under the Name of Birdsall & Hess, Appellants.

No opinion. Present—Close, P. J., Hagarty, Carswell, Johnston and Taylor, JJ.
**Exhibit 21****Subsidiaries of the Registrant**   **Name, Jurisdiction** **Relationship**   Williams Partners Operating LLC, Delaware 100%-owned by Williams Partners L.P.Williams Partners Finance Corporation,Delaware 100%-owned by Williams Partners L.P.Carbonate Trend Pipeline LLC, Delaware 100%-owned by Williams Partners Operating LLCMid-Continent Fractionation and Storage,LLC, Delaware 100%-owned by Williams Partners Operating LLCDiscovery Producer Services LLC, Delaware 60%-owned by Williams Partners Operating LLCDiscovery Gas Transmission LLC, Delaware 100%-owned by Discovery Producer Services LLCWilliams Four Corners LLC, Delaware 100%-owned by Williams Partners Operating LLCWamsutter LLC, Delaware 100% Class A LLC membership interest and 50%Class C LLC interest.
#### § 402.125 Who may release a record.

Except as otherwise provided by regulation, only the Deputy Executive Director for the Office of Public Disclosure, Office of the General Counsel, SSA, or her or his designee may determine whether to release any record in SSA's control and possession. This official is SSA's Freedom of Information Officer. Sections 402.40, 402.55, and 402.60 list some of the materials which we have determined may be released.

[62 FR 4154, Jan. 29, 1997, as amended at 68 FR 60295, Oct. 22, 2003]
(No. 74-CC-357

#### Litton Business Systems, Inc., Claimant, *vs.*State of Illinois, Department of Mental Health, Respondent.

*Opinion filed June 13, 1974.*

F. R. Ringle, Claimant, pro se.

William J. Scott, Attorney General; Howard W. Feldman, Assistant Attorney General, for Respondent.

Per Curiam.
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 97-50074 Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus RICHARD ALLAN STUART, also known as Dick Stuart, also known as R.A. Stuart, Defendant-Appellant.

- - - - - - - - - - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas USDC No. MO-95-CR-50-6

- - - - - - - - - - April 10, 1998 Before JOLLY, JONES, and DUHÉ, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: * Appellant Richard Allan Stuart appeals his sentence for conspiracy to commit bank fraud. He argues that this court should consider his appeal despite the waiver-of-appeal provision in his plea agreement, that the Government breached the plea agreement, and that his case should be remanded for resentencing because his sentence is unconstitutionally excessive and the court failed to inform him of his right to appeal. Further,No. 97-50074 -2- Stuart argues that the district court erred: 1) in calculating the loss valuation under U.S.S.G. § 2F1.1; and 2) using the 1995 Sentencing Guidelines to determine his sentence. Stuart has waived his right to appeal his sentence on the grounds raised with the exception of his claim that the Government breached his plea agreement and that the court did not inform him of his right to appeal. See United States v. Portillo , 18 F.3d 290, 292 (5th Cir. 1994). Stuart argues that since the Government did not file a motion for downward departure pursuant to U.S.S.G. § 5K1.1, despite his substantial assistance, it breached the plea agreement. Under the plea agreement the Government retained full discretion over the decision whether to file a motion for downward departure. United States v. Price , 95 F.3d 364 (5th Cir. 1996). As Stuart has not shown that the Government’s discretionary decision was based on an unconstitutional motive, see Wade v. United States , 504 U.S. 181 (1992), he cannot prevail on his claim for breach. Stuart also asserts that his case should be remanded because he was not informed of his right to appeal pursuant to Fed. R. Crim. P. 32(c)(5). Inasmuch as the record clearly indicates that the court informed Stuart of his right to appeal, notwithstanding the provisions in his plea agreement, this argument is also without merit.

AFFIRMED.
EXHIBIT 12
<TABLE>

<CAPTION>

                      U S WEST Financial Services, Inc.
                      RATIO OF EARNINGS TO FIXED CHARGES
                            (Dollars in Thousands)

                                Quarter Ended
                                                           9/30/95     9/30/94


<S>                                          <C>     <C>

Income before income taxes                   $2,297  $ 2,539
Interest expense                              7,113    9,655
Interest factor on rentals (1/3)                  5       21
                                                  -        -
Earnings                                     $9,415  $12,215

Interest expense                              7,113    9,655
Interest factor on rentals (1/3)                  5       21
                                                  -        -
Fixed charges                                $7,118  $ 9,676

Ratio of earnings to fixed charges             1.32     1.26
------------------------------------------        -        -

<CAPTION>


                                 Year-to-Date
                                                           9/30/95     9/30/94


<S>                                          <C>      <C>

Income before income taxes                   $ 7,677  $ 4,639
Interest expense                              23,682   32,428
Interest factor on rentals (1/3)                  36       98
                                                   -        -
Earnings                                     $31,395  $37,165

Interest expense                              23,682   32,428
Interest factor on rentals (1/3)                  36       98
                                                   -        -
Fixed charges                                $23,718  $32,526

Ratio of earnings to fixed charges              1.32     1.14
------------------------------------------         -        -

</TABLE>
HILLS BANCORPORATION
                                   EXHIBIT 11
                    COMPUTATION OF EARNINGS PER COMMON SHARE

<TABLE>
                                                              Three Months             Six Months
                                                             Ended June 30,          Ended June 30,
                                                          ---------------------   ---------------------
                                                            1999        1998        1999        1998
                                                          ---------------------   ---------------------
<S>                                                       <C>         <C>         <C>         <C>

Weighted average number of shares outstanding (basic) .   1,484,525   1,467,754   1,476,139   1,467,754

Weighted average of potential dilutive shares
   attributable to stock options granted computed under
   the treasury stock method ..........................      11,871      20,563      16,217      21,931
                                                          ---------   ---------   ---------   ---------

Weighted average number of shares (diluted) ...........   1,496,396   1,488,317   1,492,356   1,489,685
                                                          =========   =========   =========   =========

Earnings Per Share:

   Net income (in thousands) ..........................   $   2,081   $   1,733   $   4,160   $   3,577
                                                          =========   =========   =========   =========

   Earnings per common share:
     Basic ............................................   $    1.40   $    1.18   $    2.80   $    2.44
                                                          =========   =========   =========   =========

     Diluted ..........................................        1.39        1.16        2.78        2.40
                                                          =========   =========   =========   =========
</TABLE>
§ 5.55 Language requirements. ( a ) *General.* Mandatory information must appear in the English language, with the exception of the brand name and except as provided in paragraph (c) of this section.
( b ) *Foreign languages.* Additional statements in a foreign language, including translations of mandatory information that appears elsewhere in English on the label, are allowed on labels and containers as long as they do not in any way conflict with, or contradict, the requirements of this part.
( c ) *Distilled spirits for consumption in the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico.* Mandatory information may be stated solely in the Spanish language on labels of distilled spirits bottled for consumption within the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                                   JUN-30-1998
<CASH>                                         4,855,637
<SECURITIES>                                   274,503
<RECEIVABLES>                                  31,609,857
<ALLOWANCES>                                   145,258
<INVENTORY>                                    0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               8,648,368
<PP&E>                                         27,891,032
<DEPRECIATION>                                 6,783,508
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 69,239,951
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          4,056,585
<BONDS>                                        49,428,442
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       360,673
<OTHER-SE>                                     12,588,031
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   69,239,951
<SALES>                                        0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               7,606,589
<CGS>                                          0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  3,238,341
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             1,855,143
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                1,765,216
<INCOME-TAX>                                   0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            1,765,216
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   1,765,216
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  0.49
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  0.49
        

</TABLE>
§ 30.901 How does OWCP determine the extent of an employee's impairment that is due to a covered illness contracted through exposure to a toxic substance at a DOE facility or a RECA section 5 facility, as appropriate? ( a ) OWCP will determine the amount of impairment benefits to which an employee is entitled based on one or more impairment evaluations submitted by physicians. An impairment evaluation shall contain the physician's opinion on the extent of whole person impairment of all organs and body functions of the employee that are compromised or otherwise affected by the employee's covered illness or illnesses, which shall be referred to as an “impairment rating.”
( b ) In making impairment benefit determinations, OWCP will only consider medical reports from physicians who are certified by the relevant medical board and who satisfy any additional criteria determined by OWCP to be necessary to qualify to perform impairment evaluations under Part E, including any specific training and experience related to particular conditions and other objective factors.
( c ) OWCP will establish criteria based upon objective factors such as training and certification that must be met by physicians preparing impairment evaluations in order for an impairment evaluation to be considered in determining an impairment award. Such criteria shall be made available to claimants and the public by OWCP.
[71 FR 78534, Dec. 29, 2006, as amended at 84 FR 3060, Feb. 8, 2019]
§ 341.4 Information required to be furnished by the employee. ( a ) When applying for sickness benefits, an employee shall report the name and address of the person or company, if any, who is alleged to have caused his or her infirmity. The employee shall also provide whatever other details are reasonably needed so that the Board may establish its lien.
( b ) The employee shall, upon request, tell the Board whether and from whom he or she has collected any damages for the infirmity.
(Approved by the Office of Management and Budget under control number 3220-0036) [49 FR 570, Jan. 5, 1984, as amended at 52 FR 11018, Apr. 6, 1987]