alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 114th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 4005 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

114th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 4005

 To amend titles 23 and 49, United States Code, to allow local hiring 
                      for transportation projects.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           November 16, 2015

 Ms. Bass (for herself, Ms. Hahn, Ms. Roybal-Allard, Mr. Cardenas, Mr. 
  Ted Lieu of California, Mrs. Napolitano, Mr. Schiff, and Ms. Maxine 
Waters of California) introduced the following bill; which was referred 
         to the Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To amend titles 23 and 49, United States Code, to allow local hiring 
                      for transportation projects.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Local Hire Act''.

SEC. 2. HIGHWAY PROJECTS.

    Section 112 of title 23, United States Code, is amended by adding 
at the end the following:
    ``(h) Local Hiring.--
            ``(1) In general.--Notwithstanding any other provision of 
        law, a State may establish local hiring bid specifications or 
        consider the hiring of local workers in the evaluation of bids 
        and proposals for a project under this title.
            ``(2) Definition.--For purposes of this subsection, the 
        term `local' means the geographic boundaries of a local area, 
        as defined by the contracting agency, in which the project is 
        located.''.

SEC. 3. PUBLIC TRANSPORTATION PROJECTS.

    Section 5325 of title 49, United States Code, is amended by adding 
at the end the following:
    ``(l) Local Hiring.--
            ``(1) In general.--Notwithstanding any other provision of 
        law, a recipient of assistance under this chapter may establish 
        local hiring bid specifications or consider local hiring in the 
        evaluation of bids and proposals for a project under this 
        chapter.
            ``(2) Definition.--For purposes of this subsection, the 
        term `local' means the geographic boundaries of a local area, 
        as defined by the contracting agency, in which the project is 
        located.''.
                                 <all>
```
EXHIBIT 32

Certification Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
(Subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States
Code)

Pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and
(b) of section 1350, chapter 63 of title 18, United Stated Code), each of the
undersigned officers of Soyodo Group Holdings, Inc., a Delaware corporation (the
"Company"), does hereby certify, to such officer's knowledge, that:

The Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB for the period ended June 30, 2007 (the
"Form 10-QSB") of the Company fully complies with the requirements of Section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and the information
contained in the Form 10-QSB fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Company.


Dated: July 9, 2007                     /s/ Song Ru-Hua
                                        ----------------------------------------
                                        Song Ru-Hua, President & Treasurer

The foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to section 906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of section 1350, chapter
63 of title 18, United States Code) and is not being filed as part of a separate
disclosure document.
#### Dorothy H. Fox, Appellant, v. William F. Fox, Respondent.

Motion for reargument denied, without costs. Present — Lewis, P. J., Carswell, Johnston, Adel and Wenzel, JJ. [See *ante,*p. 895.]
**EXHIBIT 12.3**

 

#### **PACCARand Subsidiaries**

 

**COMPUTATION OF RATIO OF EARNINGS TO FIXED CHARGES**

 

**PURSUANT TO SEC REPORTING REQUIREMENTS**

(Millions of Dollars)

 
| ** **                                         | ** ** | **Six Months Ended** | ** **  |
|----------------------------------------------------|------------|----------------------|-------------|
| ** **                                         | ** ** | **June 30**     | ** **  |
| ** **                                         | ** ** | **2006**             | ** **  | **2005** | ** ** |
|                                               |       |                 |        |   |   |
| FIXED CHARGES                                      |       |                 |        |   |   |
| Interest expense  - PACCAR and Subsidiaries (1)    | ** ** | **$**                | **137.2**   |   | $ | 83.0 |   |
| Portion of  rentals deemed interest                | ** ** | **9.0**              |        | 7.2 |   |
|                                               |       |                 |        |   |   |
| TOTAL FIXED CHARGES                                | ** ** | **$**                | **146.2**   |   | $ | 90.2 |   |
|                                               |       |                 |        |   |   |
| EARNINGS                                           |       |                 |        |   |   |
| Income before  taxes - PACCAR and Subsidiaries (2) | ** ** | **$**                | **1,048.9** |   | $ | 868.8 |   |
| Fixed charges                                      | ** ** | **146.2**            |        | 90.2 |   |
|                                               |       |                 |        |   |   |
| EARNINGS AS DEFINED                                | ** ** | **$**                | **1,195.1** |   | $ | 959.0 |   |
|                                               |       |                 |        |   |   |
| RATIO OF EARNINGS TO FIXED CHARGES                 | ** ** | **8.17**             | **X**       | 10.63 | X |

 

----

(1)          Exclusive of interest,if any, paid to PACCAR.

 

(2)          Includes before-taxearnings of wholly-owned subsidiaries.

 

1

----
```

[Congressional Bills 116th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 5720 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

116th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 5720

  To amend the Fair Credit Reporting Act to prohibit the creation and 
             sale of trigger leads, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            January 30, 2020

   Mr. Clay introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                    Committee on Financial Services

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To amend the Fair Credit Reporting Act to prohibit the creation and 
             sale of trigger leads, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. TRIGGER LEAD PROHIBITION.

    Section 604(c) of the Fair Credit Reporting Act (15 U.S.C. 
1681b(c)) is amended by adding at the end the following:
            ``(4) Prohibition on trigger leads for residential mortgage 
        loans.--Notwithstanding paragraph (1), no consumer reporting 
        agency may furnish a consumer report in connection with a 
        credit transaction that is not initiated by a consumer, if the 
        report is being procured based in whole or in part on the 
        presence of an inquiry made in connection with a residential 
        mortgage loan (as defined under section 103 of the Truth in 
        Lending Act (15 U.S.C. 1602)).''.
                                 <all>
```
(No. 6692

#### Northwest Ambulance Service, Inc., Claimant, *vs.*State of Illinois, Department of Mental Health, Respondent.

*Opinion filed May 15, 1974.*

*434Northwest Ambulance Service, Inc., Claimant, pro se.

William J. Scott, Attorney General; Edward L. S. Arkema, Jr., Assistant Attorney General, for Respondent.

Per Curiam.
#### Hugh J. Reilly v. Frank Steinhart.

Motion denied, with ten dollars costs. Present — Ingraham, P. J., Clarke, Scott, Dowling and Hotchkiss, JJ.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          AUG-29-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             AUG-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               MAY-09-1999
<CASH>                                         408,750
<SECURITIES>                                   252,382
<RECEIVABLES>                                  122,067
<ALLOWANCES>                                     4,515
<INVENTORY>                                  2,104,256
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             3,081,639
<PP&E>                                       4,838,757
<DEPRECIATION>                               1,067,652
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               7,117,770
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        2,662,270
<BONDS>                                        912,225
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       930,490
<OTHER-SE>                                   2,436,578
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 7,117,770
<SALES>                                     18,319,732
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            18,644,256
<CGS>                                       16,418,154
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               18,036,145
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              32,431
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                603,570
<INCOME-TAX>                                   241,427
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            362,143
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                      118,023
<NET-INCOME>                                   244,120
<EPS-BASIC>                                     1.11
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.07


</TABLE>
#### § 332.1 Statutory provisions.

- * * (1) a day of unemployment with respect to any employee, means a calendar day on which he is able to work and is available for work and with respect to which * * * no remuneration is payable or accrues to him * * * and (2) a “day of sickness”, with respect to any employee, means a calendar day on which because of any physical, mental, psychological, or nervous injury, illness, sickness, or disease he is not able to work, or, with respect to a female employee, a calendar day on which, because of pregnancy, miscarriage, or the birth of a child, (i) she is unable to work or (ii) working would be injurious to her health, and with respect to which * * * no remuneration is payable or accrues to him * * * *Provided, further,* That any calendar day on which no remuneration is payable to or accrues to an employee solely because of the application to him of mileage or work restrictions agreed upon in schedule agreements between employers and employees or solely because he is standing by for or laying over between regularly assigned trips or tours of duty shall not be considered either a day of unemployment or a day of sickness. (Section 1(k), Railroad Unemployment Insurance Act)

[Board Order 68-72, 33 FR 11115, Aug. 6, 1968]
CERTIFICATE OF AMENDMENT
 OF
 CERTIFICATE OF LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
 OF
 K-SEA TRANSPORTATION PARTNERS L.P.
     Name
    
    AddressKSP Holding Sub, LLC
    
    55 Waugh Drive
Suite 1000
Houston, TX 77007




---



##### 



GENERAL PARTNER:
KSP HOLDING SUB, LLCBy:
    /s/ David W. GrzebinskiName:
    David W. GrzebinskiTitle:
    Manager
Authorized Person
1

Office of Mobile Sources

EPA420-B-99-011

December 1999

Calculation of I/M Waiver Adjusted for CPI

1. Use of the BLS data:

CPI adjustment for 1998 = Average CPI for September 1997 - August 1998

Average CPI for September 1988 - August 1989

Average CPI-U for September 1997 - August 1998 = 1/12 times the sum of the CPI-U for

each individual month from September

1997 through August 1998 (inclusive)

Average CPI-U for September 1988 - August 1989 = 1/12 times the sum of the CPI-U for

each individual month from September

1997 through August 1998 (inclusive)

For example, the Average CPI-U for September 1988 - August 1989 =

1/12 times (119.8 + 120.2 + 120.3 + 120.5 + 121.1 + 121.6 + 122.3 + 123.1 + 123.8 

+ 124.1 + 124.4 + 124.6 ) = 122.15

The Average CPI for 1998 = 162.18

CPI adjustment for 1998 = 162.18 = 1.3277

122.15

2. The $450 + CPI value = (CPI adjustment for 1998 times $450) = 1.3277 x 450 = $597.48

3. The data is available at the following Internet Bureau of Labor Statistics CPI home page:

http://stats.bls.gov/cpihome.htm

To retrieve the 1989 to 1998 data, select:

- "Most Requested Series"

- "Consumer Price Index-All Urban Consumers (Current Series)"

- "Consumer Price Index-All Urban Consumers"

- Select "U.S. All Items," Years to report for: "1989 to 1999"

To retrieve the September 1988 to December 1988 data, select:

- "Table Containing History of CPI-U U.S. All Items Indexes and Annual Percent Changes

From 1913 to Present." (The direct URL is:

ftp://ftp.bls.gov/pub/special.requests/cpi/cpiai.txt)
2

Year Average CPI-U Final Waiver

Amount

1989 122.2 $450.00

1995 151.1 $557.00

1996 155.2 $572.00

1997 159.5 $588.00

1998 162.2 $597.00

1999
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Miguel Angel MARTINEZ-FERRER, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 05-41160

Conference Calendar.

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.

June 20, 2006.

James Lee Turner, Assistant U.S. Attorney, U.S. Attorney’s Office Southern District of Texas, Houston, TX, for PlaintiffAppellee.

Timothy William Crooks, Assistant Federal Public Defender, Marjorie A. Meyers, Federal Public Defender, Federal Public Defender’s Office Southern District of Texas, Houston, TX, for Defendant-Appellant.

Before STEWART, DENNIS, and OWEN, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: *

Miguel Angel Martinez-Ferrer appeals his sentence for illegal reentry into the United States following deportation, in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326(a) and (b). Through a letter mailed to the clerk of this court after appointed counsel had filed an appellate brief, Martinez-Ferrer moved to discharge appellate counsel, appoint new counsel, and amend his appellate brief. He also sought to stay this court’s ruling on his appeal pending the resolution of his motion. As Martinez-Ferrer filed his motions after counsel had filed an appellate brief, the motions are denied as untimely. *See United States v. Wagner,*158 F.3d 901, 902-03 (5th Cir.1998).

The Government seeks to dismiss Martinez-Ferrer’s appeal as barred by the appellate waiver provision in his plea agreement. We need not decide whether the waiver precludes consideration of the instant appeal, however, as Martinez-Ferrer’s constitutional challenge is foreclosed *341by *Almendarez-Torres v. United States,*528 U.S. 224, 285, 118 S.Ct. 1219, 140 L.Ed.2d 350 (1998). Although MartinezFerrer contends that *Almendarez-Torres*was incorrectly decided and that a majority of the Supreme Court would overrule *Almendarez-Torres*in light of *Apprendi v. New Jersey,*530 U.S. 466, 120 S.Ct. 2348, 147 L.Ed.2d 435 (2000), we have repeatedly rejected such arguments on the basis that *Almendarez-Torres*remains binding. *See United States v. Garza-Lopez,*410 F.3d 268, 276 (5th Cir.), *cert. denied,*— U.S.-, 126 S.Ct. 298, 163 L.Ed.2d 260 (2005). Martinez-Ferrer properly concedes that his argument is foreclosed in light of *Almendarez-Torres*and circuit precedent, but he raises it here to preserve it for further review.

MOTIONS DENIED; AFFIRMED.

*

 Pursuant to 5th Cir R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.
### §1464. Voice of America/Europe

As part of its duties and programs under this subchapter, Voice of America/Europe shall—

(1) target news and features in accordance with the findings and recommendations of the Young European Survey;

(2) conduct periodic audience evaluations and measurements; and

(3) promote and advertise Voice of America/Europe.

(Jan. 27, 1948, ch. 36, title V, §504, as added Pub. L. 100–204, title IV, §402, Dec. 22, 1987, 101 Stat. 1381.)
§ 222.34 Relationship resulting from equitable adoption. In many States, where a legal adoption proceeding was defective under State law or where a contemplated legal adoption was not completed, a claimant may be considered to be an equitably adopted child. A claimant will have the relationship of an equitably adopted child for annuity and lump-sum payment purposes if, in addition to meeting the other requirements of this part— ( a ) The employee had agreed to adopt the claimant; and
( b ) The natural parents or the person legally responsible for the care of the claimant agreed to the adoption; and
( c ) The employee and the claimant lived together as parent and child; and
( d ) The agreement to adopt is recognized under applicable State law such that, if the employee were to die without leaving a will, the claimant could inherit a share of the employee's personal estate as the child of the employee.
§ 404.1602 Definitions. For purposes of this subpart: *Act* means the Social Security Act, as amended.
*Class or classes of cases* means the categories into which disability claims are divided according to their characteristics.
*Commissioner* means the Commissioner of Social Security or his or her authorized designee.
*Compassionate allowance* means a determination or decision we make under a process that identifies for expedited handling claims that involve impairments that invariably qualify under the Listing of Impairments in appendix 1 to subpart P based on minimal, but sufficient, objective medical evidence.
Determination of disability or disability determination means one or more of the following decisions: ( a ) Whether or not a person is under a disability;
( b ) The date a person's disability began; or
( c ) The date a person's disability ended.
*Disability* means *disability* or *blindness* as defined in sections 216(i) and 223 of the Act or as defined in title IV of the Federal Mine Safety and Health Act of 1977, as amended.
*Disability determination function* means making determinations as to disability and carrying out related administrative and other responsibilities.
*Disability program* means, as appropriate, the Federal programs for providing disability insurance benefits under title II of the Act and disability benefits under title IV of the Federal Mine Safety and Health Act of 1977, as amended.
*Initial* means the first level of disability adjudication.
*Other written guidelines* means written issuances such as Social Security Rulings and memoranda by the Commissioner of Social Security, the Deputy Commissioner for Programs and Policy, or the Associate Commissioner for Disability and the procedures, guides, and operating instructions in the Disability Insurance sections of the Program Operations Manual System, that are instructive, interpretive, clarifying, and/or administrative and not designated as advisory or discretionary. The purpose of including the foregoing material in the definition is to assure uniform national application of program standards and service delivery to the public.
*Quick disability determination* means an initial determination on a claim that we have identified as one that reflects a high degree of probability that you will be found disabled and where we expect that your allegations will be easily and quickly verified.
*Regulations* means regulations in this subpart issued under sections 205(a), 221 and 1102 of the Act, unless otherwise indicated.
*State* means any of the 50 States of the United States, the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico, the District of Columbia, or Guam. It includes the State agency.
*State agency* means that agency of a State which has been designated by the State to carry out the disability determination function.
*We, us,* and *our* refers to the Social Security Administration (SSA).
[46 FR 29204, May 29, 1981, as amended at 56 FR 11018, Mar. 14, 1991; 62 FR 38452, July 18, 1997; 72 FR 51177, Sept. 6, 2007; 75 FR 62682, Oct. 13, 2010]
Exhibit 31.1



CERTIFICATIONS

I, Randolph Gress, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this Annual Report on Form 10-K/A of Innophos, Inc. (the registrant); and

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the
statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report.





|                    |  |     |  |                                                                   
|------------------- |  | --- |  | ------------------------------------------------------------------
|Dated: May 21, 2008 |  | By: |  | /s/ RANDOLPH GRESS                                                
|                    |  |     |  | Randolph Gress                                                    
|                    |  |     |  | Chief Executive Officer and Director (Principal Executive Officer)
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

DAY HIGH

 205

 191

 187

 173

 171

 169

 190

 216

 250

 242

 299

 257

 232

 228

 214

 217

 197

 185

 194

 249

 284

 263

 268

 250

 231

 218

 188

 204

 305

 247

 162

 163

 163

 163

 164

 166

 168

 169

 165

 164

 163

 164

 166

 167

 166

 166

 166

 167

 169

 169

 168

 165

 164

 160

 158

 142

 140

 137

 135

 134

 171

 169

 168

 165

 166

 168

 170

 173

 174

 171

 174

 178

 176

 174

 174

 175

 172

 171

 173

 183

 189

 178

 175

 170

 168

 159

 153

 159

 173

 160

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

SEPTEMBER 2016 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: October 19, 2016

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

RIO VISTA ON THE SACRAMENTO RIVER
### SUBCHAPTER V—CONDITIONS, RESTRICTIONS, AND PROHIBITIONS
Exhibit
32.1





CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Annual Report of
SRKP 2, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31,
2008 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof
(the "Report"), I, Richard A. Rappaport, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss.
1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to
my knowledge:





(1) The
Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2) The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





/s/
      Richard A. RappaportRichard
      A. RappaportPrincipal
      Executive OfficerFebruary
      18, 2009