# EUR-Lex - 52012PC0172 - EN

*|*

# 52012PC0172

**Proposal for a REGULATION OF THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT AND OF THE COUNCIL on imports of rice originating in Bangladesh /* COM/2012/0172 final - 2012/0085 (COD) */**

			*

			*

EXPLANATORY MEMORANDUM

1.           CONTEXT OF THE PROPOSAL

The purpose of the proposal is to align
Council Regulation (EEC) No 3491/90 of 26 November 1990[1] on imports of rice originating
in Bangladesh with the differentiation between delegated and implementing powers
of the Commission introduced by Articles 290 and 291 of the Treaty on the
Functioning of the European Union (TFEU).

2.           RESULTS OF CONSULTATIONS
WITH THE INTERESTED PARTIES AND IMPACT ASSESSMENTS

Consultation of interested parties

Collection and use of expertise

There was no need for consultation of
interested parties or for external expertise since the proposal to align
Council Regulation (EEC) No 3491/90 to the Lisbon Treaty is an
inter-institutional matter that will concern all Council Regulations.

Impact assessment

No need for an impact assessment since the
proposal to align Council Regulation (EEC) No 3491/90 to the Lisbon Treaty is
an inter-institutional matter that will concern all Council Regulations.

3.           LEGAL ELEMENTS OF THE
PROPOSAL

Summary of the proposed action

Identify the delegated and implementing
powers of the Commission in Council Regulation (EEC) No 3491/90 and establish
the corresponding procedure for adoption of these acts.

Legal basis

Article 207 of the Treaty on the Functioning
of the European Union

Subsidiarity principle

Agricultural policy is of shared competence
between the EU and the Member States. This means that as long as the EU does
not legislate in the sector Member States maintain their competence. This
proposal is limited to adapting the provisions on preferential imports of rice
originating in Bangladesh to new requirements introduced by the Lisbon Treaty.
Thus the existing Union approach is not affected by this Proposal.

Proportionality principle

The proposal complies with the
proportionality principle.

Choice of instruments

Proposed instrument: Regulation of the
European Parliament and of the Council.

Other means would not be adequate for the
following reason: direct application is due to the nature of the CAP and its
management requirements an indispensable characteristic of CAP legislation.

4.           BUDGETARY IMPLICATION

This measure has no budgetary implications.

2012/0085 (COD)

Proposal for a

REGULATION OF THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT
AND OF THE COUNCIL

on imports of rice originating in
Bangladesh

THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT AND THE
COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION,

Having regard to the Treaty on the
Functioning of the European Union, and in particular Article 207 thereof,

Having regard to the proposal from the
European Commission[2],

After transmission of the draft legislative
act to the national Parliaments,

Acting in accordance with the ordinary
legislative procedure,

Whereas:

(1)       In the context of the
Uruguay round, the Union has undertaken to offer preferential import
arrangements for rice originating in the least–developed countries. One of the
countries to which the offer was addressed, Bangladesh, indicated its interest
in the development of trade in rice. To that end, Council Regulation (EEC) No 3491/90
of 26 November 1990 on imports of rice originating in Bangladesh[3] has been adopted.

(2)       Regulation (EEC) No
3491/90 confers powers on the Commission in order to implement some of its
provisions. As a consequence of the entry into force of the Lisbon Treaty, those
powers need to be aligned to Articles 290 and 291 of the Treaty on the
Functioning of the European Union (the Treaty). For the sake of clarity it is
appropriate to repeal Regulation (EEC) No 3491/90 and to replace it with a new
Regulation.

(3)       In order to ensure the
reliability and the efficiency of the preferential import arrangement, the
power to adopt acts in accordance with Article 290 of the Treaty should be
delegated to the Commission to establish rules making the participation in the
arrangement conditional upon the lodging of a security. It is of particular
importance that the Commission carry out appropriate consultations during its
preparatory work, including at expert level. The Commission, when preparing and
drawing-up delegated acts, should ensure a simultaneous, timely and appropriate
transmission of relevant documents to the European Parliament and to the
Council.

(4)       In order to ensure uniform
conditions for the implementation of this Regulation, implementing powers
should be conferred on the Commission. Those powers, save where explicitly
provided otherwise, should be exercised in accordance with Regulation (EU) No
182/2011 of the European Parliament and the Council of 16 February 2011 laying
down the rules and general principles concerning mechanisms for control by
Member states of the Commission's exercise of implementing powers[4]. However, where the suspension
of the preferential import arrangement becomes necessary, the Commission should
be allowed to adopt implementing acts without applying the Regulation (EU) No
182/2011.

(5)       The preferential import
arrangements involve a reduction of the import duty within the limits of a
certain quantity of husked rice. The equivalent quantities at stages of milling
other than that of husked rice should be calculated in accordance with Commission
Regulation (EC) No 1312/2008 of 19 December 2008 fixing the conversion rates,
the processing costs and the value of the by-products for the various stages of
rice processing[5].

(6)       In order to fix the import
duties applicable to rice originating in Bangladesh
imported under this Regulation, account should be taken of the relevant
provisions of Regulation No XXXX/XXXX of the European
Parliament and of the Council establishing a common organisation of
agricultural markets and on specific provisions for certain agricultural
products (Single CMO Regulation)[6].

(7)       To ensure that the
advantages of the preferential import arrangements are limited only to rice
originating in Bangladesh, a certificate of origin should be issued and an export
tax of an amount corresponding to the reduction of the import duty should be
collected by the exporting country,

HAVE ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

Article 1

Scope

1.           This Regulation
establishes a preferential import arrangement for imports of rice originating
in Bangladesh falling within CN codes 1006 10 (excluding CN code 1006 10 10),
1006 20 and 1006 30.

2.           The preferential import
arrangement shall be limited, by calendar year, to a quantity equivalent to 4
000 tonnes of husked rice.   
The quantities at stages of milling other than the husked-rice stage shall be
converted using the conversion rates fixed in Article 1 of Regulation (EC) No
1312/2008.

3.           By means of an
implementing act adopted without the assistance of the Committee referred to in
Article 323(1) of Regulation No XXXX/XXXX, the Commission shall suspend the
application of the preferential import arrangement provided for in paragraph 1
of this Article once it ascertains that, during the year in progress, imports
qualifying under the said arrangement have reached the quantity indicated in
paragraph 2.

Article 2

Import duty

1.           Within the limits of the
quantity laid down in Article 1(2), the import duty on rice shall be equal:

— for paddy rice falling within CN codes 1006
10, with the exception of CN code 1006 10 10, to the customs duties fixed in
the Common Customs Tariff, less 50 % and less a further EUR 4,34;

— for husked rice falling within CN code 1006
20, to the duty fixed in accordance with Article 242 of the Regulation No
XXXX/XXXX , less 50 % and less a further EUR 4,34;

— for semi-milled and milled rice falling
within CN code 1006 30, to the duty fixed pursuant to Article 244 of the
Regulation No XXXX/XXXX, less EUR 16,78, less a further 50 % and less EUR 6,52.

2.           Paragraph 1 shall apply subject
to the following conditions:

(a)     that proof is provided that an export
tax of an amount corresponding to the reduction referred to in paragraph 1 has
been collected by Bangladesh

(b)     that the competent authority of
Bangladesh has issued a certificate of origin

Article 3

Delegated powers

The Commission shall be empowered to adopt
delegated acts in accordance with Article 4 laying down rules making the
participation in the preferential import arrangement established in Article 1 conditional
upon the lodging of a security.

Article 4

Exercise of the delegation

1.           The power to adopt
delegated acts is conferred on the Commission subject to the conditions laid
down in this Article.

2.           The power to adopt
delegated acts referred to in Article 3 shall be conferred on the Commission
for an indeterminate period of time from the day of entry into force of this
Regulation.

3.           The delegation of power
referred to in Article 3 may be revoked at any time by the European Parliament
or by the Council. A decision to revoke shall put an end to the delegation of
the power specified in that decision. It shall take effect the day following
the publication of the decision in the Official Journal of the European
Union or at a later date specified therein. It shall not affect the
validity of any delegated acts already in force.

4.           As soon as it adopts a
delegated act, the Commission shall notify it simultaneously to the European
Parliament and to the Council.

5.           A delegated act adopted
pursuant to Article 3 shall enter into force only if no objection has been
expressed either by the European Parliament or the Council within a period of
two months of notification of that act to the European Parliament and the
Council or if, before the expiry of that period, the European Parliament and
the Council have both informed the Commission that they will not object. That
period shall be extended by two months at the initiative of the European
Parliament or of the Council.

Article 5

Implementing powers

The Commission shall, by means of implementing
acts, adopt the necessary measures concerning:

(a)          the administrative method to be
used for the management of the preferential import arrangement ;

(b)          the means for determining the
origin of the product covered by the preferential import arrangement;

(c)          the form and period of validity
of the certificate of origin referred to in Article 2(2);

(d)          the nature of the proofs required
to establish that the export tax referred to in Article 2 (2) has been paid ;

(e)          the period of validity of the
import licences, where appropriate;

(f)           the amount of the security
required to be lodged in accordance with Article 3;

(g)          the notifications to be made to
the Commission by Member States.

Those implementing acts shall be adopted in
accordance with the examination procedure referred to in Article [323(2)] of
Regulation (EU) No [xxxx/xxxx] of the European Parliament and of the Council (Single
CMO Regulation).

Article 6

Repeal

Regulation (EEC) No 3491/90 is repealed.

References to Regulation (EEC) No 3491/90
shall be construed as references to this Regulation and be read in accordance
with the correlation table set out in the Annex to this Regulation.

Article 7

Entry into force

This Regulation shall enter into force on
the day following that of its publication in the Official Journal of the
European Union.

This Regulation shall be binding
in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels,

For the European Parliament                       For
the Council

The President                                                 The
President

ANNEX

CORRELATION
TABLE REFERRED TO IN ARTICLE 6

Regulation (EEC) No 3491/90 || This Regulation

Article 1 || Article 2

Article 2(1) || Article 1(2)

Article 2(2) || Article 1(3)

Article 3 || Articles 3, 4 and 5

[1]               OJ L 337, 4.12.1990, p. 1. Regulation as amended by
Regulation (EC) No 1532/2007 (OJ L 337, 21.12.2007, p. 19)

[2]               OJ C [...], [...], p. [...].

[3]               OJ L 337, 4.12.1990, p. 1.

[4]               OJ L 55, 28.2.2011, p.13.

[5]               OJ L 344, 20.12.2008, p. 56

[6]               OJ L [...], [...], p. [...].