alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### C. P. Jacobson v. Robert Lynn.

Filed May 4, 1898.

No. 8005.

*1.*Trespass: Action eob Damages: Venue. An action to recover damages for trespass upon real estate can be brought alone in the county where the lands are situate.

2. Appeal: Jurisdiction. A district court cannot acquire jurisdiction of a cause if the court from which the appeal was taken had no jurisdiction of the subject-matter.

*795Error from the district court of Knox county. Tried below before Robinson, J.

*Reversed.*

*J. C.*Robinson, for plaintiff in error.

*H. F. Barnhart*and *J. H.*Berryman, *contra.*

Norval, J.

Robert Lynn brought this suit before a justice of the peace in Knox county to recover damages alleged to have been sustained by reason of defendant’s cattle trespassing upon plaintiff’s lands described as being situate in Cedar county. The defendant appeared before the justice and objected to the jurisdiction of the court over the subject-matter of the action, which objection was overruled, and from a judgment rendered against the defendant in the sum of $35.75, damages and costs, he prosecuted an appeal to the district court. A petition was filed therein by the plaintiff praying judgment in the sum of $150, for damages to certain described real estate .in Cedar county. The defendant moved to dismiss for the want of jurisdiction of the justice and district courts over the subject-matter, which motion was denied, and an exception was taken. A trial was had before a jury, resulting in a verdict and judgment in favor of plaintiff for $1, and to reverse which the defendant prosecutes a petition in error.

The sole proposition presented for consideration is whether either the justice of the peace or the district court acquired jurisdiction over the subject of the controversy. The question is one not difficult of solution. Section 51 of the Code of Civil Procedure declares: “All actions to recover damages for any trespass upon or any injury to real estate shall be brought only in the county where such real estate is situated,” etc. This language is so plain, direct, and unambiguous as not to require judicial interpretation. The command of the legislature is imperative that an action for trespass upon *796lands can be instituted alone in the county where they are situate. Such an action is not transitory in its nature, and the courts of one county have no jurisdiction to hear, try, and determine a suit to recover damages to real estate located in another county. If this is not so, the statute quoted is meaningless. The justice of the peace had no jurisdiction of the subject-matter of this suit, and the district court acquired none by reason of the appeal. *(Brondberg v. Babbott,*14 Neb. 517.) The judgment is reversed and the cause dismissed.

Reversed and dismissed.
### §3475. Contracts

#### (a) Authorization of Secretary

Subject to the provisions of chapters 1 to 11 of title 40 and division C (except sections 3302, 3307(e), 3501(b), 3509, 3906, 4710, and 4711) of subtitle I of title 41, the Secretary is authorized to make, enter into, and perform such contracts, grants, leases, cooperative agreements, or other similar transactions with Federal or other public agencies (including State and local governments) and private organizations and persons, and to make such payments, by way of advance or reimbursement, as the Secretary may determine necessary or appropriate to carry out functions of the Secretary or the Department.

#### (b) Limitations

Notwithstanding any other provision of this chapter, no authority to enter into contracts or to make payments under this subchapter shall be effective except to such extent or in such amounts as are provided in advance under appropriation Acts. This subsection shall not apply with respect to the authority granted under section 3481 of this title.

(Pub. L. 96–88, title IV, §415, Oct. 17, 1979, 93 Stat. 685.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

In subsec. (a), "chapters 1 to 11 of title 40 and division C (except sections 3302, 3307(e), 3501(b), 3509, 3906, 4710, and 4711) of subtitle I of title 41" substituted for "the Federal Property and Administrative Services Act of 1949" on authority of Pub. L. 107–217, §5(c), Aug. 21, 2002, 116 Stat. 1303, which Act enacted Title 40, Public Buildings, Property, and Works, and Pub. L. 111–350, §6(c), Jan. 4, 2011, 124 Stat. 3854, which Act enacted Title 41, Public Contracts.
Editorial Note on Part 17
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 17 appear by T.D. ATF-436, 66 FR 5470, 5471, Jan. 19, 2001.

§ 17.125 Adoption of formulas and processes. ( a ) *Adoption of predecessor's formulas.* If there is a change in the proprietorship of a nonbeverage plant and the successor desires to use the predecessor's formulas at the same location, the successor may, in lieu of submitting new formulas in its own name, adopt any or all of the formulas of the predecessor by filing a notice of adoption with the appropriate TTB officer. The notice shall be filed with the first claim relating to any of the adopted formulas. The notice shall list, by name and serial number, all formulas to be adopted, and shall state that the products will be manufactured in accordance with the adopted formulas and processes. The notice shall be accompanied by a certified copy of the articles of incorporation or other document(s) necessary to prove the transfer of ownership. The manufacturer shall retain a copy of the notice with the related formulas.
( b ) *Adoption of manufacturer's own formulas from a different location.* A manufacturer's own formulas may be adopted for use at another of the manufacturer's plants. Further, a wholly owned subsidiary may adopt the formulas of the parent company, and vice versa. A letterhead notice must be filed with the appropriate TTB officer and be accompanied by two photocopies of each formula to be adopted. The notice shall list the numbers of all formulas to be adopted and shall indicate the plant where each was originally approved and the plant(s) where each is to be adopted. Some evidence of the relationship between the plants involved in the adoption shall be attached to the notice. The notice shall be referenced in Part IV of the supporting data (TTB Form 5154.2) filed with the first claim relating to the adopted formula(s).
[T.D. ATF-379, 61 FR 31412, June 20, 1996, as amended by T.D. ATF-436, 66 FR 5471, Jan. 19, 2001]
MEMORANDUM

RE: Ex Parte Communications in Connection with

Docket No. EERE

– 2010

– BT

– STD

– 0027

Energy Conservation Standards for Commercial and Industrial Electric Motors: Public

Meeting and Availability of the Preliminary Technical Support Document

77 Fed. Reg. 43015 (July 23, 2012)

To: expartecommunications@hq.doe.gov

From: Alex Boesenberg, Manager of Regulatory Affairs

National Ele ctrical Manufacturers Association

Date: July 15, 2013

Enc l : Motor Training Presentation

Th is memorandum memorializes a communication between DOE staff and members of the

NEMA Motor and Generator Section in connection with this proceeding. NEMA thank s the DOE

for the opportunity to conduct training for DOE staff and its consultants on July 15 th

, 2013 which

illustrated the different types of motors, motor construction theory and motor applications by

type

. It is our hope that better understanding of motor types and construction will assist the

Department and its consultants with the discharge of their duties.

Attendees of the July 15 th meeting were as follows: Ashley Armstrong (DOE), Ami Grace

- Tardy

(DOE), Laura Barhydt (DOE), Michael Kido (DOE), Pamela Costello (Navigant), Lucas Adi n (DOE), Brian Coffey ( Navigant ), Paul Lin (Regal Beloit), Gary Fernstrom (CA IOUs), Joanna

Mauer (ASAP), Jeff Casey (Brook Crompton), Vijeta Jangra (Navigant), S anaee I ya ma (LBNL),

Steve Tabor (Bluffton Motor Works), Bill Finley (Siemens), Dale Basso (Nidec Motors), Dan

Delaney (Regal Beloit), John Malinowski (Baldor), Tim Schumann (SEW Eurodrive), Roger

Daugherty (Baldor), Rob Boteler (Nidec), Michael Rivest (Navigant), D oug Rawald (DOE), Alex

Boesenber g (NEMA), Andrew deLaski (ASAP)

.

The presentation given during the meeting is enclosed.

If you have any questions on these comments, please contact me at 703

- 841

- 3268 or

alex.boesenberg@nema.org

.

Sincerely,

Alex Boesenberg

Manager

, Regulatory Affairs

National Electrical Manufacturers

Association
### SUBCHAPTER VIII—RETIREMENT AND DISABILITY SYSTEM
ACCEPTED

06-15-00029-CR

SIXTH COURT OF APPEALS

TEXARKANA, TEXAS

3/5/2015 5:35:40 PM

DEBBIE AUTREY

CLERK

 FILED IN 6th COURT OF APPEALS TEXARKANA, TEXAS 3/5/2015 5:35:40 PM DEBBIE AUTREY Clerk
###### Editorial Note on Part 44

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 44 appear by T.D. ATF-464, 66 FR 43480, Aug. 20, 2001, and T.D. ATF-480, 67 FR 30801-30803, May 8, 2002.

#### § 44.87 Power of attorney.

If the application for permit or other qualifying documents are signed by an attorney in fact for an individual, partnership, association, company, or corporation, or by one of the partners for a partnership, or by an officer of an association or company, or, in the case of a corporation, by an officer or other person not authorized to sign by the corporate documents described in § 44.83, power of attorney conferring authority upon the person signing the documents shall be manifested on Form 5000.8 in accordance with its instructions.

[25 FR 4716, May 28, 1960. Redesignated at 40 FR 16835, Apr. 15, 1975, as amended by T.D. ATF-480, 67 FR 30802, May 8, 2002]
#### Estelle Morgenstern, Respondent, v. Hans Morgenstern, Appellant.

Order affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements. No opinion. Present — Ingraham, P. J., McLaughlin, Laughlin, Clarke and Scott, JJ.
#### § 204.6 Employment relation—pay for time lost.

For the purpose of crediting pay for time lost as provided in § 211.3 of this chapter, an individual must have maintained an employment relation to one or more employers in the month or months to be credited with pay for time lost. For that purpose an employment relation exists with respect to any month in which an individual, although not in the active service of an employer, is on furlough subject to recall by an employer, is on a bona fide leave of absence, has not been retired or discharged but was by reason of continuous disability unable to return to service, or was not in active service because of a discharge later determined to be wrongful. However, an employment relation with respect to an employer ceases after an individual has resigned or relinquished his or her rights to return to the service of that employer.
EXHIBIT 32.1

              CERTIFICATES OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER PURSUANT TO
         SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2003 (18 U.S.C. 1350)

     Solely for the  purposes  of  complying  with 18 U.S.C.  ss.  1350,  I, the
undersigned  Chief Executive  Officer of Century Pacific  Financial  Corporation
(the "Company"),  hereby certify, based on my knowledge,  that the Annual Report
on Form  10-KSB  of the  Company  for the year  ended  September  30,  2003 (the
"Report"):

     1.   Fully  complies  with  the   requirements  of  Section  13(a)  of  the
          Securities Exchange Act of 1934: and

     2.   That  information  contained  in the Report  fairly  presents,  in all
          material respects,  the financial  condition and results of operations
          of the Company.



/s/ David Hadley
--------------------------------
David Hadley
February 10, 2004
Exhibit 4.1


 


AMENDMENT

TO

ACTINIUM PHARMACEUTICALS, INC. WARRANT TO PURCHASE COMMON STOCK


 


Pursuant to Section 9(a) of the Warrant to Purchase Common Stock
of (the “Warrant”) of Actinium Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (the “Company”), originally dated December
17, 2012, issued to Amrosan LLC in the amount of 375,556 warrant shares, the Board of Directors of the Company has duly adopted
a resolution approving this Amendment to the Warrant to extend the term of the Warrant to February 21, 2022 as follows:


 


		1.	Section 1 of the Warrant is hereby amended to read
in its entirety as follows:



 


“Term
of Warrant. Subject to the terms and conditions set forth herein, this Warrant shall be exercisable, in whole or in part,
during the term commencing (“Issuance Date”) December 17, 2012 (the “Warrant Issue Date”),
and ending at 5:00 p.m., Eastern Time on February 21, 2022 and shall be void thereafter.”


 


		2.	All other terms and provisions of the Warrant shall
remain unchanged and in full force and effect as written.



 


IN WITNESS WHEREOF, this
Amendment to the Warrant is made effective this 8th day of November, 2018.


 





	 	 	ACTINIUM PHARMACEUTICALS, INC.
	 	 	 	 
	 	 	By:	/s/ David Nicholson
	 	 	Name:	David Nicholson
	 	 	Title:	Chairman Compensation Committee
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY HIGH

 9,267

 8,194

 6,542

 6,094

 6,799

 6,629

 5,193

 5,727

 5,948

 6,049

 4,999

 4,949

 4,768

 4,334

 3,686

 3,767

 3,747

 3,487

 3,178

 13,689

 15,784

 15,358

 14,862

 14,489

 15,046

 15,604

 14,495

 16,269

 16,959

 17,324

 17,109

 2,814

 2,574

 2,169

 1,832

 1,751

 1,590

 1,563

 1,471

 1,771

 2,335

 2,213

 2,117

 1,690

 1,485

 1,230

 1,178

 1,239

 1,253

 1,266

 1,329

 6,456

 6,460

 6,770

 6,336

 6,065

 5,565

 4,981

 5,092

 5,265

 5,861

 6,379

 5,274

 4,638

 4,035

 3,853

 3,719

 3,602

 3,285

 3,354

 3,568

 4,311

 3,449

 3,088

 2,926

 2,525

 2,178

 2,190

 2,251

 2,183

 2,148

 5,612

 10,556

 10,584

 10,490

 9,824

 9,424

 9,495

 9,384

 9,978

 10,613

 11,406

 10,935

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

AUGUST 2009 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: September 2, 2009

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

PITTSBURG BOTTOM ON THE SACRAMENTO RIVER
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

DAY

 12,847

 12,546

 12,341

 12,267

 12,267

 12,459

 12,299

 12,028

 11,771

 11,558

 11,365

 11,677

 11,885

 12,013

 12,194

 12,267

 12,368

 12,682

 12,987

 13,222

 13,600

 13,801

 13,972

 14,043

 13,891

 14,104

 14,257

 14,312

 24,457

 24,636

 24,699

 24,668

 24,525

 24,206

 24,211

 24,283

 24,319

 24,310

 24,305

 23,970

 23,583

 23,379

 23,224

 23,752

 24,229

 24,247

 24,206

 24,346

 24,372

 24,570

 24,722

 24,902

 25,248

 25,149

 25,095

 25,211

STORAGE - A.F. 

 37,304

 37,182

 37,040

 36,935

 36,792

 36,665

 36,510

 36,311

 36,090

 35,868

 35,670

 35,647

 35,468

 35,392

 35,418

 36,019

 36,597

 36,929

 37,193

 37,568

 37,972

 38,371

 38,694

 38,945

 39,139

 39,253

 39,352

 39,523

1,421

1,252

1,341

1,254

1,162

1,121

2,487

1,211

1,155

1,166

1,173

1,202

1,257

1,245

1,679

2,170

2,182

2,270

2,275

3,856

2,836

2,465

2,212

1,990

1,860

1,718

2,092

2,375

1,363

1,190

1,269

1,201

1,090

1,057

2,409

1,111

1,043

1,054

1,073

1,190

1,167

1,207

1,692

2,473

2,473

2,437

2,408

4,045

3,040

2,666

2,375

2,117

1,958

1,775

2,142

2,461

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

FEBRUARY 2005 FULL NATURAL FLOW AT NEW MELONES DAM RUN DATE: 03/01/2005

TOTALS +2,103 51,486

* October 1, 102,122

 227.4

 229.8

 232.3

 234.7

 236.8

 238.9

 243.7

 245.9

 248.0

 250.1

 252.2

 254.6

 256.9

 259.3

 262.6

 267.5

 272.4

 277.3

 282.0

 290.1

 296.1

 301.4

 306.1

 310.3

 314.2

 317.7

 321.9

 326.8

DONNELLS

RES

BEARDSLEY

RES

2004 TO DATE

NEW

MELONES

INFLOW

C.F.S

NATURAL

RIVER

C.F.S

ACCUM *

FULL

NATURAL

1000 A.F.

RESERVOIR

TOTAL

-116

-122

-142

-105

-143

-127

-155

-199

-221

-222

-198

-23

-179

-76

+26

+601

+578

+332

+264

+375

+404

+399

+323

+251

+194

+114

+99

+171

CHANGE

A.F. C.F.S.

-58

-62

-72

-53

-72

-64

-78

-100

-111

-112

-100

-12

-90

-38

+13

+303

+291

+167

+133

+189

+204

+201

+163

+127

+98

+57

+50

+86
EXHIBIT 12
                           BellSouth Corporation
                 Computation Of Earnings To Fixed Charges
                           (Dollars In Millions)






                                              For the Three Months
                                                Ended March 31,
                                                      2000
1. Earnings

   (a) Income from continuing
       operations before deductions
       for taxes and interest                    $   1,837

   (b) Portion of rental expense
       representative of interest
       factor                                           28
   (c) Equity in losses from
       less-than-50%-owned
       investments (accounted
       for under the equity
       method of accounting)                            13

   (d) Excess of earnings over
       distributions of less-
       than-50%-owned investments
      (accounted for under the
       equity method of accounting)                    (51)

         TOTAL                                   $   1,827

2. Fixed Charges

   (a) Interest                                 $      316

   (b) Portion of rental expense
       representative of interest
       factor                                           28
         TOTAL                                  $      344

   Ratio (1 divided by 2)                             5.31
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

DAY

 32,092

 31,694

 31,376

 30,981

 30,522

 30,109

 29,734

 29,338

 28,931

 28,534

 28,124

 28,140

 28,215

 28,287

 28,358

 28,433

 28,508

 28,581

 28,655

 28,783

 28,888

 28,944

 29,006

 29,088

 29,032

 28,695

 28,342

 27,954

 27,528

 27,057

 38,589

 38,835

 39,030

 39,174

 38,943

 38,651

 38,354

 38,068

 37,794

 37,519

 37,250

 36,508

 35,775

 35,047

 34,433

 33,703

 32,696

 32,224

 31,486

 30,809

 30,071

 29,259

 28,500

 27,760

 27,285

 27,211

 27,150

 27,109

 27,077

 27,095

STORAGE - A.F. 

 70,681

 70,529

 70,406

 70,155

 69,465

 68,760

 68,088

 67,406

 66,725

 66,053

 65,374

 64,648

 63,990

 63,334

 62,791

 62,136

 61,204

 60,805

 60,141

 59,592

 58,959

 58,203

 57,506

 56,848

 56,317

 55,906

 55,492

 55,063

 54,605

 54,152

342

348

213

360

684

638

789

684

579

561

634

650

594

575

488

643

522

588

643

1,021

580

621

627

586

532

476

427

487

414

455

262

271

151

233

336

283

450

340

236

222

292

284

262

244

214

313

52

387

308

744

261

240

276

254

264

269

218

271

183

227

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

NOVEMBER 2013 FULL NATURAL FLOW AT NEW MELONES DAM RUN DATE: 12/19/2013

TOTALS -16,688 8,347

* October 1, 16,556

 20.3

 20.9

 21.2

 21.6

 22.3

 22.8

 23.7

 24.4

 24.9

 25.3

 25.9

 26.5

 27.0

 27.5

 27.9

 28.5

 28.6

 29.4

 30.0

 31.5

 32.0

 32.5

 33.0

 33.5

 34.0

 34.6

 35.0

 35.5

 35.9

 36.4

DONNELLS

RES

BEARDSLEY

RES

2013 TO DATE

NEW

MELONES

INFLOW

C.F.S

NATURAL

RIVER

C.F.S

ACCUM *

FULL

NATURAL

1000 A.F.

RESERVOIR

TOTAL

-159

-152

-123

-251

-690

-705

-672

-682

-681

-672

-679

-726

-658

-656

-543

-655

-932

-399

-664

-549

-633

-756

-697

-658

-531

-411

-414

-429

-458

-453

CHANGE

A.F. C.F.S.

-80

-77

-62

-127

-348

-355

-339

-344

-343

-339

-342

-366

-332

-331

-274

-330

-470

-201

-335

-277

-319

-381

-351

-332

-268

-207

-209

-216

-231

-228
§ 266.8 Advance notice of the determination to make representative payment. ( a ) As a general rule, whenever the Board intends to make representative payment and to name a representative payee, the Board will notify the annuitant or, in the case of an unemancipated minor under age 18, or an individual who is legally incompetent, the individual acting on his or her behalf of the Board's proposed actions. Such notice will tell the person that the Board plans to name a representative payee and who that payee will be. The notice will also ask the person to contact the Board within 15 days of the date of the notice if he or she objects to either proposed action. If he or she objects to either proposed action, the objecting party may— ( 1 ) Review the evidence upon which the proposed actions will be based; and
( 2 ) Submit any additional evidence regarding the proposed actions.
( b ) If the objecting party objects to the proposed actions, the Board will review its proposed determinations and consider any additional information provided. The Board will then issue a decision on whether to appoint a representative payee and who that payee will be. If the objecting party is dissatisfied with either determination, he or she may request a reconsideration under part 260 of this chapter.
( c ) If the objecting party does not file a timely objection to the proposed actions, the Board will issue a decision on whether to appoint a representative payee and who that payee will be. If the objecting party is dissatisfied with either determination, he or she may request a reconsideration under part 260 of this chapter.
( d ) A request for reconsideration or an appeal from a determination under this section under part 260 of this chapter shall not prevent the Board from making payments to a representative payee during the pendency of such reconsideration or appeal.
( e ) The Board's failure or refusal to select an individual as representative payee or the Board's termination of representative payee status with respect to an individual is not subject to a request for reconsideration or an appeal under part 260 of this chapter by such individual.
(No. 73-CC-430

#### Catholic Charities of the Archdiocese of Chicago, Claimant, *vs.*State of Illinois, Department of Children and Family Services, Respondent.

*Opinion filed February 8, 1974.*

Catholic Charities of the Archdiocese of Chu cago, Claimant, pro se.

William J. Scott, Attorney General; Edward L. S. Arkema, Jr., Assistant Attorney General, for Respondent.

Per Curiam.
August 23,2010 ;-S r,^^--? 

The Honorable Randy Babbitt ir ifagj ^ 

Secretary U.S. Department of Transportation „ ha=5'^ 

400 7* Street, SW ^ 

Washington, DC 20590 ^ ,^ 

en i-o 

Dear Secretary Babbitt: 

Great Lakes Aviation is pleased to submit this letter in support of the application for a 

Small Community Air Service Development grant submitted by the Telluride Regional 

Airport Authority (TRAA) and the Telluride Montrose Regional Air Organization 

(TMRAO). 

Great Lakes Aviation applauds the Department of Transportation's intent to assist 

airports and community organizations like TRAA and TMRAO in developing their 

underserved markets. The Small Community Air Service Development Program allows 

these communities the opportunity to pursue air service which is generally a catalyst for 

local economic growth and development. 

Our experience shows that active local support via revenue guarantee programs and 

community-based marketing programs are critical to the success of air service in small 

communities. 

Great Lakes has engaged in an ongoing dialogue with Telluride concerning air service 

issues and needs affecting air service to their community. We support the approach 

outlined in the Telluride grant application to address these difficult issues and this is of 

great interest to us as we consider future air service opportunities. 

If I can be of any further assistance, please do not hesitate to contact me. Thank you very 

much for your time and consideration. 

Sincerely, 

Charies R. Howell IV 

CEO 

1022 Airport Parkway • Cheyennc^SSJ^iBiftiaO?) 432-7000 • Fax (307) 432-7001
#### Isaac Goldowitz and Others v. Henry Kupfer & Company.

Application denied, with ten dollars costs. Order signed. Present — Ingraham, P. J., Clarke, Scott, Dowling and Hotchkiss, JJ.