alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 30.231 How does a claimant prove employment-related exposure to a toxic substance at a DOE facility or a RECA section 5 facility? To establish employment-related exposure to a toxic substance at a Department of Energy facility or RECA section 5 facility as required by § 30.230(d), an employee, or his or her survivor(s), must prove that the employee was employed at such facility and that he or she was exposed to a toxic substance in the course of that employment. ( a ) Proof of employment may be established by any trustworthy records that, on their face or in conjunction with other such records, establish that the employee was so employed and the time period(s) of such employment. If the only evidence of covered employment submitted by the claimant is a written affidavit or declaration subject to penalty of perjury by the employee, survivor or any other person, and DOE or another entity either disagrees with the assertion of covered employment or cannot concur or disagree with the assertion of covered employment, then OWCP will evaluate the probative value of the affidavit in conjunction with the other evidence of employment, and may determine that the claimant has not met his or her burden of proof under § 30.111.
( b ) For claimants who have established proof of employment, proof of exposure to a toxic substance may be established by the submission of any appropriate document or information that is evidence that such substance was present at the facility where the employee was employed and that the employee came into contact with such substance. Information from the following sources may be considered as probative factual evidence for purposes of establishing an employee's exposure to a toxic substance at a DOE facility or a RECA section 5 facility: ( 1 ) To the extent practicable and appropriate, from DOE, a DOE-sponsored Former Worker Program, or an entity that acted as a contractor or subcontractor to DOE;
( 2 ) OWCP's Site Exposure Matrices; or
( 3 ) Any other entity deemed by OWCP to be a reliable source of information necessary to establish that the employee was exposed to a toxic substance at a DOE facility or RECA section 5 facility.
[71 FR 78534, Dec. 29, 2006, as amended at 84 FR 3049, Feb. 8, 2019]
EXHIBIT 11
                                              BellSouth Corporation
                                        Computation of Earnings Per Share

                                 For the Three Month Periods Ended
                                             March 31,
                                      1999                1998
Basic Earnings Per Common Share:

Net Income                         $   615             $   892

Weighted Average Shares
Outstanding                          1,932               1,983


Earnings Per Common Share          $   .32             $   .45




<PAGE>



                                           EXHIBIT 11
                                          BellSouth Corporation
                              Computation of Earnings Per Share (continued)

                                 For the Three Month Periods Ended
                                             March 31,
                                      1999                1998
Diluted Earnings Per Common Share:

Net Income                         $   615             $   892

Weighted Average Shares
Outstanding                          1,932               1,983

Incremental shares from
assumed exercise of
stock options and payment of
performance share awards                19                  10

Total Shares                         1,951               1,993

Earnings Per Common Share          $   .32             $   .45
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY ELEV

 221.81

 221.52

 221.10

 221.75

 221.52

 221.16

 219.83

 219.75

 219.56

 219.89

 219.11

 219.14

 219.44

 220.21

 221.03

 221.97

 220.63

 221.36

 222.19

 223.35

 223.01

 221.97

 222.46

 220.19

 219.98

 220.08

 219.72

 219.50

 220.39

 221.38

 220.81

 47,887

 47,125

 46,023

 47,730

 47,125

 46,180

 42,712

 42,505

 42,016

 42,867

 40,864

 40,940

 41,708

 43,697

 45,839

 48,308

 44,792

 46,705

 48,889

 51,982

 51,073

 48,308

 49,607

 43,645

 43,100

 43,360

 42,428

 41,862

 44,166

 46,758

 45,263

STORAGE

+1,051

-762

-1,102

+1,707

-605

-945

-3,468

-207

-489

+851

-2,003

+76

+768

+1,989

+2,142

+2,469

-3,516

+1,913

+2,184

+3,093

-909

-2,765

+1,299

-5,962

-545

+260

-932

-566

+2,304

+2,592

-1,495

CHANGE

873

866

867

853

827

537

386

400

431

440

432

525

454

389

407

631

653

741

905

934

1,654

1,952

1,849

2,085

2,731

2,583

2,772

3,113

3,120

3,174

3,251

PUMPING

 509

 461

 536

 767

 412

 490

 527

 553

 579

 534

 529

 415

 437

 506

 700

 637

 619

 102

 0

 0

 0

 0

 207

 303

 0

 200

 0

 27

 319

 321

 323

PUMPING

 3,358

 3,442

 3,606

 3,254

 5,011

 5,004

 4,975

 3,848

 3,305

 3,305

 4,064

 3,610

 3,451

 3,615

 3,618

 3,540

 7,571

 4,465

 4,637

 4,637

 6,920

 3,921

 4,763

 8,327

 5,599

 6,465

 7,897

 7,853

 6,764

 6,822

 7,135

PUMPING

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

GEN.

*

-41

+178

+241

+235

-113

+195

-19

+147

-100

+234

-14

+136

-10

+397

+253

+70

+289

+175

+56

+308

+233

+43

+98

+98

-32

+63

+397

-16

+108

-46

-42

OR

UNITED STATES 

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION

CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT

CONSOLIDATED STATE-FEDERAL O'NEILL FOREBAY February 1, 2010

DAILY OPERATIONS

JANUARY 2010 RUN DATE:

IN LAKE GEN.

ACRE-FEET O'NEILL

RELEASE - C.F.S. 

TOTALS -1,573 40,835 0 154,782 11,013 +3,521

ACRE-FEET -1,573 80,996 0 307,010 21,844

SUMMARY

 0

RELEASE (ACRE-FEET)

O'NEILL GEN. 0

SAN LUIS PUMP 307,010 0

 46,836

DOS AMIGOS PUMP 21,844

DELIVERIES 

S. LUIS O'NEILL

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

CALIF. DOS AMIGOS

AQUEDUCT

3,565

2,475

2,478

3,793

4,404

4,285

3,386

3,749

3,306

3,594

3,165

3,403

3,832

4,338

4,739

4,721

5,475

4,616

4,776

4,954

4,575

532

3,678

3,442

2,625

4,150

4,258

4,498

5,016

5,322

3,495

 120,645

 239,299

S. LUIS

DELIV.

GAINS(+)

LOSS(-)

C.F.S.

INFLOW - C.F.S

STATE OF CALIFORNIA

THE RESOURCES AGENCY

DEPARTMENT OF WATER RESOURCES

STATE WATER PROJECT

TOTAL 328,854

 6,984

* DAILY DEL. FIGURES UNAVAILABLE. TOT. DEL. IS INCLUDED IN COMPUTING MONTHLY TOTALS
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY HIGH

 5,189

 5,080

 5,907

 7,540

 8,682

 9,475

 9,479

 8,727

 7,854

 5,944

 3,668

 2,493

 3,070

 2,790

 3,690

 4,721

 5,366

 5,533

 4,675

 5,192

 5,623

 5,643

 5,051

 4,691

 3,831

 3,253

 2,801

 2,948

 3,569

 3,868

 4,835

 548

 616

 733

 700

 1,074

 1,092

 867

 623

 757

 755

 575

 546

 505

 508

 643

 701

 747

 705

 602

 666

 725

 547

 642

 543

 558

 518

 600

 548

 522

 538

 626

 2,006

 1,931

 2,160

 2,862

 3,381

 3,557

 3,489

 3,136

 2,938

 2,612

 1,840

 1,321

 1,246

 1,203

 1,388

 1,607

 2,003

 1,785

 1,725

 1,924

 2,092

 2,025

 1,965

 1,791

 1,696

 1,613

 1,461

 1,340

 1,373

 1,315

 1,711

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

MAY 2004 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: June 8, 2004

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

PITTSBURG BOTTOM ON THE SACRAMENTO RIVER
Editorial Note on Part 25
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 25 appear by T.D. ATF-437, 66 FR 5478, 5479, Jan. 19, 2001.

§ 25.143 Cases. ( a ) *Brewer's name.* The brewer's name or trade name will be shown on each case or other shipping container of bottled beer. A brewer may use unmarked cases to hold: ( 1 ) Cartons of beer, if the visible portion of the cartons shows the required name; or
( 2 ) Bottles or cans with plastic carriers, if the visible portion of the bottles or cans shows the required name.
( b ) *Other information.* The brewer may show on a case or shipping container the place of production (city and, when necessary for identification, State), and the addresses of other breweries owned by the same person, firm, or corporation (as defined in § 25.181). If only one address is shown, it will be that of the producing brewery, or of the brewer's principal place of business.
(Approved by the Office of Management and Budget under control number 1512-0474) (Sec. 201, Pub. L. 85-859, 72 Stat. 1389, as amended (26 U.S.C. 5412))
[T.D. ATF-224, 51 FR 7673, Mar. 5, 1986, as amended by T.D. ATF-225, 51 FR 8492, Mar. 12, 1986]
(No. 73-CC-283

#### Paul D. Mc Curry, Claimant, *vs.*State of Illinois, Department of Registration and Education, Respondent.

*Opinion filed July 9, 1973.*

Paul D. Mc Curry, FAIA, Claimant, pro se.

William J. Scott, Attorney General; Saul R. Wexler, Assistant Attorney General, for Respondent.

Per Curiam.
### §7221f. Solicitation of input from charter school operators

To the extent practicable, the Secretary shall ensure that administrators, teachers, and other individuals directly involved in the operation of charter schools are consulted in the development of any rules or regulations required to implement this subpart, as well as in the development of any rules or regulations relevant to charter schools that are required to implement part A of subchapter I, the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act [20 U.S.C. 1400 et seq.], or any other program administered by the Secretary that provides education funds to charter schools or regulates the activities of charter schools.

(Pub. L. 89–10, title IV, §4307, formerly title V, §5207, as added Pub. L. 107–110, title V, §501, Jan. 8, 2002, 115 Stat. 1798; renumbered title IV, §4307, Pub. L. 114–95, title IV, §4001(b)(2)(A), (B), (D)(iii), Dec. 10, 2015, 129 Stat. 1967.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

The Individuals with Disabilities Education Act, referred to in text, is title VI of Pub. L. 91–230, Apr. 13, 1970, 84 Stat. 175, which is classified generally to chapter 33 (§1400 et seq.) of this title. For complete classification of this Act to the Code, see section 1400 of this title and Tables.
### Part A—General
htgm-ex103_14.htm



 

	
 
	

	
EXHIBIT 10.3



Amendment No.2 Statement of Work No. Two

THIS AMENDMENT No. 2 (hereinafter "Amendment 2") to Statement of Work No. Two is effective as of August 14, 2018 (the "Amendment 2 Effective Date") by and between HTG Molecular Diagnostics, Inc. ("HTG") and QIAGEN Manchester Limited ("QIAGEN").

Whereas, QIAGEN and HTG entered into that certain Statement of Work No. Two, dated June 2, 2017, and first amended effective July 2, 2018 (the "Agreement") and the parties now desire to extend the scope and duration of their Development activities under the Agreement;

Now, therefore, based upon the above premises, and in consideration of the mutual covenants and conditions contained in the Agreement and herein, the parties agree as follows:


	
 
	
1.
	
Pursuant to Section 4.2 of the Agreement, QIAGEN and HTG confirm they have exchanged details of their respective additional Development activities for mutual review and approval prior to the full execution of this Amendment 2. These additional Development activities shall be subject to all terms and conditions of the Agreement.





	
 
	
2.
	
Pursuant to Section 6.2.1 of the Agreement, QIAGEN and HTG have exchanged their additional estimated Project Costs for mutual review and approval prior to the full execution of this Amendment 2. These additional Project Costs shall be subject to all terms and conditions of the Agreement.





	
 
	
3.
	
Except as noted above, the Agreement as originally stated shall remain in full force and effect.





	
 
	
4.
	
This Amendment may be executed in one more counterparts, each of which shall be deemed an original, and all of which together shall be deemed to be one and the same instrument. Facsimile or other electronically transmitted signatures shall be deemed original signatures.







HTG/QIAGEN CONFIDENTIALPage 1 of 2

 



 

 

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, HTG and QIAGEN each has caused this Amendment 2 to be executed by its respective duly authorized representative as of the Amendment 2 Effective Date.

 


		
	
HTG Molecular Diagnostics, Inc.
	
QIAGEN MANCHESTER LIMITED

	
By: /s/ Timothy B. Johnson
	
By: /s/ Thierry Bernard

	
Name: Timothy B. Johnson
	
Name: Thierry Bernard

	
Title: President and Chief Executive Officer

 
	
Title: Sr. VP, Business Area MDx

 




 

 

 

 

HTG/QIAGEN CONFIDENTIALPage 2 of 2
### **CHAPTER 13—SERVICE COURTS OF FRIENDLY FOREIGN FORCES**

Sec.
701.
Definitions.
702.
Arrest of offenders.
703.
Attendance of witnesses.
704.
Immunities of courts and witnesses.
705.
Imprisonment.
706.
Operative effect dependent upon Presidential finding.
#### In re Vivian R. CLARKE, Petitioner.

No. 06-3014.

United States Court of Appeals, Third Circuit.

Submitted Under Rule 21, Fed. R.App. P. July 14, 2006.

Filed: Aug. 8, 2006.

Before: Chief Judge SCIRICA, WEIS and GARTH, Circuit Judges.

OPINION

PER CURIAM.

Pro se petitioner Vivian R. Clarke filed a petition for writ of mandamus. Clarke seeks review of the order entered by the United States District Court for the District of Delaware denying his motion to appoint counsel and dismissing his complaint without prejudice. We will deny the mandamus petition.

In 2005, Clarke filed a *pro se*civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1981(a) and § 1985(3). The District Court dismissed Clarke’s complaint without prejudice on December 15, 2005, and gave Clarke until January 17, 2006 to file an amended complaint. Instead of filing an amended complaint, Clarke filed a document entitled “Emergency Motion” on January 19, 2006, which the District Court docketed as a Notice of Appeal. On June 12, 2006, this Court issued a briefing notice in that appeal. *See*C.A. No. 06-1431. Prior to receiving our briefing notice, Clarke filed the instant mandamus petition on June 7, 2006. *See*C.A. 06-3014.

The remedy of mandamus is reserved for the most extraordinary of circumstances. *DeMasi v. Weiss,*669 F.2d 114, 117 (3d Cir.1982). In order to ensure that mandamus is sparingly granted, a petitioner seeking a writ of mandamus must demonstrate that no other adequate means are available to obtain the desired relief, and that the right to issuance of the writ is “clear and indisputable.” *Allied Chem. Corp. v. Daiflon, Inc.,*449 U.S. 33, 35, 101 *113S.Ct. 188, 190, 66 L.Ed.2d 193 (1980) (per curiam) (quotation omitted). A mandamus petition is not a substitute for an appeal; if a petitioner can obtain relief by an ordinary appeal, a court will not issue the writ. *See In re Ford Motor Co.,*110 F.3d 954, 957 (3d Cir.1997).

Here, Clarke has an alternative means of challenging the District Court’s order: the appeal which is already pending before this Court. In any event, Clarke’s petition provides no basis on which to grant mandamus relief. Accordingly, the petition for a writ of mandamus is denied.
EXHIBIT 3.33
 Delaware
 
 The First State
     
 /s/ Harriett Smith WindsorHarriet Smith Windsor, Secretary of State 4257865 8100H
    
    AUTHENTICATION: 6210719071286240
    
    Date: 12-05-07




---



##### 



CERTIFICATE OF FORMATION
 OF
 JACKSONVILLE MEDICAL PROFESSIONAL SERVICES, LLC
 
    IN WITNESS WHEREOF
 By:

    /s/ Rebecca HurleyName: Rebecca HurleyTitle:   Authorized Person
 STATE OF DELAWARESECRETARY OF STATEDIVISION OF CORPORATIONSDELIVERED 09:15 AM 11/28/2006FILED 09:15 AM 11/28/2006SRV 061081767  4257865 FILE




---



##### 



CERTIFICATE OF AMENDMENT
 TO
 CERTIFICATE OF FORMATION
 OF
 JACKSONVILLE MEDICAL PROFESSIONAL SERVICES, LLC
       th
 By:

    /s/ Denise W. WarrenName: Denise W. Warren, Authorized Person
 STATE OF DELAWARESECRETARY OF STATEDIVISION OF CORPORATIONSDELIVERED 04:16 PM 03/03/2008FILED 03:12 PM 03/03/2008SRV 080275719  4257865 FILE
FIRST DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

STATE OF FLORIDA

_____________________________

No. 1D20-3238

_____________________________

CALVIN HOLIDAY,

Petitioner,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Respondent.

_____________________________

Petition Alleging Ineffective Assistance of Appellant Counsel—

Original Jurisdiction.

September 30, 2021

PER CURIAM.

The petition alleging ineffective assistance of appellate 

counsel is denied on the merits. 

B.L. THOMAS, ROBERTS, and LONG, JJ., concur.

_____________________________

Not final until disposition of any timely and 

authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 

9.331.

_____________________________
2

Calvin Holiday, pro se, Petitioner.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, and Heather Flanagan Ross, 

Assistant Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Respondent.
#### § 336.15 How to claim extended benefits.

An employee who has 10 or more years of railroad service who exhausts his or her rights to normal unemployment or normal sickness benefits and who wishes to claim extended unemployment or extended sickness benefits may do so by claiming benefits on the forms provided by the Board pursuant to parts 325 or 335 of this chapter. The claim forms provided for this purpose are the same as those provided for claiming normal benefits. No special application for extended benefits is required, and no waiting period applies to the payment of extended benefits.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY HIGH

 12,237

 12,105

 11,938

 11,753

 11,986

 9,876

 8,311

 8,977

 7,943

 7,930

 9,088

 8,573

 11,141

 12,016

 11,628

 11,790

 12,839

 10,886

 9,712

 9,354

 9,172

 7,992

 9,348

 8,114

 8,637

 9,023

 9,931

 10,054

 9,816

 9,255

 9,524

 1,759

 1,645

 1,668

 2,139

 2,232

 2,211

 1,937

 2,300

 2,224

 2,289

 2,336

 2,404

 2,574

 2,520

 2,473

 3,130

 2,498

 2,161

 2,161

 2,125

 2,034

 2,257

 2,602

 2,559

 2,430

 2,341

 2,302

 1,911

 1,633

 1,560

 1,637

 4,890

 5,057

 5,188

 5,918

 6,262

 5,266

 4,896

 5,123

 4,811

 4,299

 4,533

 5,231

 6,104

 5,964

 6,155

 6,983

 6,206

 5,392

 5,338

 5,014

 4,662

 4,998

 5,553

 5,094

 4,688

 4,728

 4,667

 4,424

 4,118

 3,978

 4,084

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

JULY 2012 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: August 3, 2012

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

PITTSBURG TOP ON THE SACRAMENTO RIVER
Exhibit 99



                              HILLS BANCORPORATION
                          CERTIFICATION OF 10-Q FILING
                                 JUNE 30, 2002

                                 CERTIFICATION




Pursuant to the requirements of Section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002,
Dwight O. Seegmiller and James G. Pratt certify that:

1.   Form 10-Q for the quarterly  period ended June 30, 2002 fully complies with
     the requirements of Sections 13(a) or 15(d) of the 1934 Act, and

2.   The information  contained in Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended June
     30,  2002 fairly  presents,  in all  material  respects,  the  registrant's
     financial condition and results of operations of the registrant.


August 14, 2002                       /s/ Dwight O. Seegmiller
------------------------              ------------------------------------------
Date                                  Dwight O. Seegmiller, President
                                      (Duly authorized office of the registrant)



August 14, 2002                       /s/ James G. Pratt
------------------------              ------------------------------------------
Date                                  James G. Pratt, Treasurer
                                      (Principal Financial Officer)


                                       1
EXHIBIT
32.2




CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C.
SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
connection with the Quarterly Report of Omphalos, Corp. (the "Company") on Form
10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2010 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), the undersigned officer
of the Company hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to such officer’s knowledge that:





(i)  the
Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the quarterly period ended
September 30, 2009 (the “Report”) fully
complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d), as applicable,
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (subject to the Company's
position prevailing in regard to the remaining unresolved SEC comment, as more
fully described in the Report); and





(ii)  the
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to
the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities
and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.




May
      10, 2010
                    
                    /s/
      Chu Pi
      YunChu
      Pi YunChief
      Financial
Officer