alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                              5
<LEGEND>
         This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the
         financial statements of Realmark Property Investors Limited Partnership
         III for the six months ended June 30, 1998, and is qualified in its
         entirety by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER>                           1
       
<S>                                               <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                     6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                                     DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                                        JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                                          JUN-30-1998
<CASH>                                                    611,835
<SECURITIES>                                            1,513,653
<RECEIVABLES>                                             605,264
<ALLOWANCES>                                              449,492
<INVENTORY>                                                     0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                        2,611,887
<PP&E>                                                 12,395,029
<DEPRECIATION>                                          5,761,960
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                          9,390,532
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                     624,104
<BONDS>                                                 4,946,600
<COMMON>                                                        0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                           0
<PREFERRED>                                                     0
<OTHER-SE>                                                      0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                            9,390,532
<SALES>                                                         0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                        1,411,967
<CGS>                                                           0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                           1,519,803
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                                0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                                0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                        282,484
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                          (107,836)
<INCOME-TAX>                                                    0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                             0
<DISCONTINUED>                                                  0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                                 0  
<CHANGES>                                                       0  
<NET-INCOME>                                             (107,836)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                               (6.73)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                                   0
        

</TABLE>
-       - Superintendent of Documents
      - 2023-07-14T00:34:57-0400
      - Government Publishing Office, Washington, DC 20401
      - Government Publishing Office
      - Government Publishing Office attests that this document has not been altered since it was disseminated by Government Publishing Office
Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion *

should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited

circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 08-60772

Conference Calendar

ROBERT WALL

Plaintiff-Appellant

v.

BRUCE PEARSON, Warden; FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS

Defendants-Appellees

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Mississippi

USDC No. 5:08-CV-234

Before JONES, Chief Judge, and JOLLY and ELROD, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Robert Wall, federal prisoner # 13965-052, is appealing the district court’s

denial of his petition for mandamus and his request for relief under the All Writs

Act, 28 U.S.C. § 1651. He argues that the warden suspended the delivery of

legal and personal mail because of an incident in another facility and that it may

prejudice his ability to prosecute his pending proceeding filed pursuant to 28

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

F I L E D

April 30, 2009

Charles R. Fulbruge III

Clerk
No. 08-60772

2

U.S.C. § 2255. Wall contends that he has no other adequate remedy to obtain

access to the courts.

A “writ of mandamus is an order directing a public official or public body

to perform a duty exacted by law.” United States v. Denson, 603 F.2d 1143, 1146

(5th Cir. 1979). It “is an extraordinary remedy for extraordinary causes.” In re

Corrugated Container Antitrust Litig. v. Mead Corp., 614 F.2d 958, 961-62 (5th

Cir. 1980) (internal citations and quotations omitted). To obtain the writ, the

petitioner must show “that no other adequate means exist to attain the

requested relief and that his right to the issuance of the writ is ‘clear and

indisputable.’” In re Willy, 831 F.2d 545, 549 (5th Cir. 1987) (citations omitted).

The issuance of the writ is within the court’s discretion. Denson, 603 F.2d at

1146.

If Wall can show that the suspension of the mail delivery has prejudiced

his rights in a legal process, his appropriate remedy is to file a complaint

pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 alleging the denial of access to the courts. See

Richardson v. McDonnell, 841 F.2d 120, 122 (5th Cir. 1988). Thus, he has an

adequate civil remedy.

Insofar as Wall seeks relief under the All Writs Act, it is not available

unless the applicant can show that he has no other adequate remedy. In re

Montes, 677 F.2d 415, 416 (5th Cir. 1982). As previously discussed, Wall has an

adequate remedy to obtain relief.

The district court did not abuse its discretion in denying the petition for

mandamus or Wall’s request for relief under the All Writs Act, § 1651.

Accordingly, the judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.
5. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our mostrecent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors andthe audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalentfunctions):     a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design oroperation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonablylikely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process,summarize and report financial information; and     b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or otheremployees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting.Date:November 12, 2008      /s/ Stanley J. Talbi Stanley J. Talbi
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER>  1
       
<S>                                                  <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                                               MAR-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                                                    JUN-30-1997
<CASH>                                                           21,395,619
<SECURITIES>                                                        286,860
<RECEIVABLES>                                                    29,402,135
<ALLOWANCES>                                                        419,516
<INVENTORY>                                                               0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                                 56,493,708
<PP&E>                                                           18,485,151
<DEPRECIATION>                                                    7,733,548
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                                   76,682,316
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                            41,339,362
<BONDS>                                                                   0
<COMMON>                                                             91,096
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                                     0
<PREFERRED>                                                               0
<OTHER-SE>                                                       26,685,514
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                                     76,682,316
<SALES>                                                                   0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                                 53,327,030
<CGS>                                                                     0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                                    50,985,316
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                                  (257,628)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                                    108,674
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                                   60,249
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                                   2,129,434
<INCOME-TAX>                                                        802,230
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                               1,327,204
<DISCONTINUED>                                                            0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                                           0
<CHANGES>                                                                 0
<NET-INCOME>                                                      1,327,204
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                                           .09
<EPS-DILUTED>                                                           .08
        

</TABLE>
EXHIBIT 21.1

LIST OF SUBSIDIARIES



|                          
|--------------------------
|Quintana Management LLC   
|Quintana Logistics LLC    
|Fearless Shipco LLC       
|King Coal Shipco LLC      
|Coal Glory Shipco LLC     
|Coal Age Shipco LLC       
|Iron Man Shipco LLC       
|Barbara Shipco LLC        
|Coal Pride Shipco LLC     
|Linda Leah Shipco LLC     
|Iron Beauty Shipco LLC    
|Kirmar Shipco LLC         
|Iron Vassilis Shipco LLC  
|Iron Fuzeyya Shipco LLC   
|Iron Bradyn Shipco LLC    
|Grain Harvester Shipco LLC
|Santa Barbara Shipco LLC  
|Iron Bill Shipco LLC      
|Ore Hansa Shipco LLC      
|Iron Anne Shipco LLC      
|Iron Kalypso Shipco LLC   
|Grain Express Shipco LLC  
|Iron Knight Shipco LLC    
|Coal Gypsy Shipco LLC     
|Pascha Shipco LLC         
|Coal Hunter Shipco LLC    
|Iron Lindrew Shipco LLC   
|Iron Brooke Shipco LLC    
|Iron Manolis Shipco LLC   
|Iron Miner Shipco LLC     
|Lowlands Beilun Shipco LLC
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS  SCHEDULE  CONTAINS  SUMMARY  FINANCIAL   INFORMATION  EXTRACTED  FROM  THE
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS FOR THE 12 MONTHS ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 1998 AND IS QUALIFIED
IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          SEP-30-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             OCT-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1998
<CASH>                                               0
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                       0
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          508,933
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       532,676
<OTHER-SE>                                 (1,041,609)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   508,953
<SALES>                                         42,855
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                43,233
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  (378)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     (378)
<EPS-BASIC>                                          0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0


</TABLE>
FIRST DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

STATE OF FLORIDA

_____________________________

No. 1D19-733

_____________________________

WILLIAM BROWN,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellee.

_____________________________

On appeal from the Circuit Court for Duval County.

Tatiana Salvador, Judge.

September 9, 2019

PER CURIAM.

This is an appeal from an order dismissing Appellant’s second 

motion for postconviction relief on the ground that the trial court 

lacked jurisdiction to entertain the motion during the pendency of 

Appellant’s appeal from the denial of his first motion for 

postconviction relief. The State properly concedes that the trial 

court had jurisdiction to rule on Appellant’s second postconviction 

motion where the issue raised in that motion was unrelated to the

issues raised in his prior postconviction motion. See Rhow v. State, 

264 So. 3d 288 (Fla. 1st DCA 2019). Accordingly, we reverse and 

remand for further proceedings.

REVERSED and REMANDED.

WOLF, ROBERTS, and JAY, JJ., concur.
2

_____________________________

Not final until disposition of any timely and 

authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 

9.331.

_____________________________

William Brown, pro se, Appellant.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, and Anne C. Conley, Assistant 

Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY HIGH

 199

 212

 229

 246

 249

 263

 277

 275

 269

 270

 271

 272

 275

 273

 255

 259

 254

 238

 240

 244

 242

 246

 248

 252

 249

 249

 249

 262

 262

 274

 263

 146

 161

 171

 195

 188

 200

 200

 212

 221

 215

 209

 225

 222

 215

 212

 217

 215

 213

 209

 206

 211

 210

 212

 212

 212

 208

 210

 207

 210

 222

 226

 178

 187

 204

 218

 217

 228

 237

 240

 239

 237

 239

 241

 240

 238

 234

 234

 230

 225

 222

 222

 221

 222

 222

 224

 225

 224

 226

 230

 238

 240

 240

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

JANUARY 2013 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: March 15, 2013

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

RIO VISTA ON THE SACRAMENTO RIVER
#### Avis Rent A Car Systems *v.*Crown High Corporation

*Stephen I. Traub,*for the defendant.

*Thomas B. Wilson,*for the plaintiff.

Submitted September 5

decided November 3, 1970

The motion by the defendant for review in the appeal from the Court of Common Pleas in New London County is denied.

The motion by the plaintiff to dismiss the defendant’s motion for review in the appeal from the Court of Common Pleas in New London County is dismissed.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY HIGH

 380

 405

 586

 785

 669

 857

 1,171

 1,332

 1,287

 1,043

 654

 592

 695

 1,015

 942

 1,645

 1,597

 3,155

 2,675

 4,361

 3,578

 4,910

 3,669

 3,978

 4,601

 3,049

 2,585

 3,094

 3,765

 4,164

 4,232

 245

 237

 241

 240

 246

 250

 253

 261

 272

 274

 275

 270

 283

 288

 300

 318

 352

 380

 428

 386

 556

 615

 585

 598

 671

 596

 466

 495

 590

 721

 773

 263

 271

 299

 334

 308

 370

 429

 501

 511

 461

 422

 399

 436

 437

 433

 545

 666

 880

 948

 1,236

 1,569

 1,728

 1,718

 1,778

 2,037

 1,523

 1,376

 1,413

 1,533

 1,645

 2,033

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

MAY 2012 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: June 22, 2012

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

PITTSBURG TOP ON THE SACRAMENTO RIVER
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

DAY ELEV

 495.99

 495.89

 495.78

 495.67

 495.57

 495.46

 495.40

 495.32

 495.23

 495.13

 495.03

 494.94

 494.82

 494.70

 494.58

 494.45

 494.23

 493.95

 493.71

 493.48

 493.24

 493.01

 492.75

 492.53

 492.38

 492.18

 492.05

 491.92

 491.93

 491.84

 204.0

 203.8

 203.5

 203.1

 202.9

 202.5

 202.4

 202.2

 201.9

 201.6

 201.3

 201.1

 200.7

 200.4

 200.1

 199.7

 199.1

 198.3

 197.6

 197.0

 196.3

 195.7

 195.0

 194.4

 193.9

 193.4

 193.0

 192.7

 192.7

 192.5

STORAGE

-0.5

-0.3

-0.3

-0.3

-0.3

-0.3

-0.2

-0.2

-0.3

-0.3

-0.3

-0.3

-0.3

-0.3

-0.3

-0.4

-0.6

-0.8

-0.7

-0.6

-0.7

-0.6

-0.7

-0.6

-0.4

-0.6

-0.4

-0.4

+0.0

-0.2

CHANGE

160

70

55

58

67

49

122

93

67

60

67

84

44

42

45

28

13

14

71

57

27

42

9

69

155

21

49

50

241

110

INFLOW

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

MADERA

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

SPILL

 177

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 116

 199

 198

 169

 154

 153

 153

 152

 152

 85

 0

 0

 0

 0

FRIANT-KERN

 33

 18

 17

 20

 16

 12

 14

 13

 10

 17

 24

 26

 28

 26

 29

 26

 23

 24

 24

 25

 18

 15

 20

 26

 15

 18

 23

 25

 22

 30

C.F.S.

 .36

 .20

 .19

 .22

 .18

 .13

 .15

 .14

 .11

 .19

 .26

 .28

 .31

 .29

 .32

 .29

 .25

 .27

 .27

 .28

 .20

 .17

 .22

 .29

 .17

 .20

 .26

 .28

 .25

 .34

INCHES

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .35

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .44

 .48

 .01

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

PRECIP

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

APRIL 2015 MILLERTON LAKE DAILY OPERATIONS RUN DATE: May 1, 2015

IN LAKE

EVAPORATION

INCHES

C.F.S.

COMPUTED*

1000 ACRE-FEET

RELEASE - C.F.S. 

TOTALS -12.1 2,039 0 1,708 0 637 7.07 1.28

ACRE-FEET -12,072 4,044 0 3,388 0 1,263

COMMENTS:

* COMPUTED INFLOW IS THE SUM OF CHANGE IN STORAGE, RELEASES, PUMPING AND EVAPORATION.

SUMMARY

RELEASE (ACRE-FEET)

CANALS

FRIANT-KERN

MADERA

 3,388

 0 14,863

PRECIPITATION

THIS MONTH =

JULY 1, 2014 TO DATE = 7.35

 204.5

 11,475 1.28

CANALS

AT FRIANT

TOTAL RELEASES

OUTLET

 195

 195

 195

 195

 194

 194

 194

 194

 186

 186

 186

 186

 186

 186

 186

 186

 186

 186

 186

 186

 192

 197

 197

 197

 197

 196

 206

 205

 205

 205

RIVER

 5,785

 11,475

RIVER
### Part B—Reorganization Authority
[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 77 (Thursday, April 21, 2011)]
[Notices]
[Page 22422]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2011-9693]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

Bureau of Land Management

[CACA 49187, LLCA920000 L1310000 FI0000]


Notice of Proposed Reinstatement of Terminated Oil and Gas Lease 
CACA 49187, California

AGENCY: Bureau of Land Management, Interior.

ACTION: Notice of proposed reinstatement of terminated oil and gas 
leases.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Under the provisions of 30 U.S.C. 188(d) and (e), and 43 CFR 
3108.2-3(a) and (b)(1), the Bureau of Land Management (BLM) received a 
petition for reinstatement of oil and gas lease CACA 49187 from Gasco 
Production Co. The petition was filed on time and was accompanied by 
all required rentals and royalties accruing from December 1, 2010, the 
date of termination.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Rita Altamira, Land Law Examiner, 
Branch of Adjudication, Division of Energy and Minerals, BLM California 
State Office, 2800 Cottage Way, W-1623, Sacramento, California 95825, 
(916) 978-4378.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: No valid lease has been issued affecting the 
lands. The lessee has agreed to new lease terms for rentals and 
royalties at rates of $5 per acre or fraction thereof and 16 \2/3\ 
percent, respectively. The lessee has paid the required $500 
administrative fee and has reimbursed the BLM for the cost of this 
Federal Register notice. The Lessee has met all the requirements for 
reinstatement of the lease as set out in Sections 31(d) and (e) of the 
Mineral Leasing Act of 1920 (30 U.S.C. 188), and the Bureau of Land 
Management is proposing to reinstate the lease effective December 1, 
2010, subject to the original terms and condition of the lease and the 
increased rental and royalty rates cited above.

Debra Marsh,
Supervisor, Branch of Adjudication, Division of Energy & Minerals.
[FR Doc. 2011-9693 Filed 4-20-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-40-P