alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY

 16,221

 16,689

 17,645

 18,959

 19,963

 20,719

 21,383

 22,052

 22,760

 23,764

 25,038

 26,767

 28,679

 30,820

 32,346

 33,794

 34,998

 36,034

 36,871

 37,738

 38,814

 39,814

 40,541

 41,131

 41,733

 42,339

 43,020

 43,861

 44,833

 45,782

 46,670

 56,488

 56,978

 57,340

 57,623

 57,822

 58,206

 58,259

 58,595

 59,135

 59,526

 60,057

 60,462

 60,911

 61,085

 61,241

 61,535

 61,577

 61,613

 61,854

 62,053

 62,155

 62,343

 62,487

 62,632

 62,741

 62,868

 62,935

 63,105

 63,262

 63,396

 63,512

STORAGE - A.F. 

 72,709

 73,667

 74,985

 76,582

 77,785

 78,925

 79,642

 80,647

 81,895

 83,290

 85,095

 87,229

 89,590

 91,905

 93,587

 95,329

 96,575

 97,647

 98,725

 99,791

 100,969

 102,157

 103,028

 103,763

 104,474

 105,207

 105,955

 106,966

 108,095

 109,178

 110,182

1,009

1,249

933

1,084

991

938

919

851

842

960

751

854

826

818

732

853

726

691

586

647

463

678

782

633

490

618

556

531

789

775

818

1,704

1,732

1,597

1,889

1,598

1,513

1,280

1,358

1,471

1,663

1,661

1,930

2,016

1,985

1,580

1,731

1,354

1,231

1,129

1,184

1,057

1,277

1,221

1,004

848

988

933

1,041

1,358

1,321

1,324

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

MAY 2013 FULL NATURAL FLOW AT NEW MELONES DAM RUN DATE: 07/19/2013

TOTALS +38,851 43,978

* October 1, 87,230

 376.0

 379.4

 382.6

 386.3

 389.5

 392.5

 395.0

 397.7

 400.7

 404.0

 407.2

 411.1

 415.1

 419.0

 422.1

 425.6

 428.3

 430.7

 432.9

 435.3

 437.4

 439.9

 442.3

 444.3

 446.0

 448.0

 449.8

 451.9

 454.6

 457.2

 459.8

DONNELLS

RES

BEARDSLEY

RES

2012 TO DATE

NEW

MELONES

INFLOW

C.F.S

NATURAL

RIVER

C.F.S

ACCUM *

FULL

NATURAL

1000 A.F.

RESERVOIR

TOTAL

+1,378

+958

+1,318

+1,597

+1,203

+1,140

+717

+1,005

+1,248

+1,395

+1,805

+2,134

+2,361

+2,315

+1,682

+1,742

+1,246

+1,072

+1,078

+1,066

+1,178

+1,188

+871

+735

+711

+733

+748

+1,011

+1,129

+1,083

+1,004

CHANGE

A.F. C.F.S.

+695

+483

+664

+805

+607

+575

+361

+507

+629

+703

+910

+1,076

+1,190

+1,167

+848

+878

+628

+540

+543

+537

+594

+599

+439

+371

+358

+370

+377

+510

+569

+546

+506
#### The People of the State of New York ex rel. Culver Associates, Inc., Appellant, against William W. Mills et al., as Commissioners of Taxes and Assessments of the City of New York, Respondents. [646-662 First Ave., Borough of Manhattan.]

Order unanimously affirmed, with $20 costs and disbursements. No opinion. Present — Glennon, J. P., Dore, Cohn, Callahan and Van Voorhis, JJ.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY HIGH

 175

 179

 178

 187

 191

 185

 194

 176

 156

 150

 147

 147

 155

 145

 150

 131

 134

 112

 101

 92

 83

 81

 80

 79

 78

 77

 75

 71

 70

 70

 69

 144

 144

 145

 145

 144

 142

 144

 135

 118

 117

 84

 116

 106

 104

 98

 97

 99

 92

 86

 82

 80

 77

 77

 73

 73

 70

 69

 67

 67

 65

 65

 152

 152

 152

 153

 156

 153

 156

 149

 128

 124

 111

 122

 119

 111

 108

 101

 102

 100

 90

 85

 81

 80

 78

 76

 74

 73

 71

 69

 68

 67

 67

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

MARCH 2008 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: April 8, 2008

HIGH LOW MEAN

 59.1

 57.8

 58.2

 58.8

 58.9

 57.3

 58.8

 60.1

 59.5

 59.5

 58.8

 59.7

 60.6

 58.2

 56.3

 54.9

 55.3

 57.4

 56.4

 56.1

 55.5

 56.2

 56.8

 57.5

 57.8

 57.1

 56.1

 56.2

 56.7

 56.5

 56.0

 56.6

 54.0

 53.4

 54.3

 54.5

 54.8

 54.2

 55.6

 55.3

 55.6

 56.9

 56.6

 57.8

 55.7

 53.6

 51.6

 51.6

 52.7

 53.7

 54.3

 53.4

 53.7

 54.1

 54.9

 55.7

 55.2

 54.7

 53.9

 55.4

 54.3

 54.1

 57.7

 56.0

 55.9

 56.6

 56.8

 56.2

 56.5

 57.7

 57.5

 57.7

 58.0

 58.2

 59.0

 57.0

 54.9

 53.4

 53.5

 54.4

 54.9

 55.2

 54.5

 54.9

 55.5

 56.2

 56.7

 56.3

 55.4

 55.0

 56.0

 55.4

 55.0

HIGH LOW MEAN

 8.7

 9.0

 9.1

 8.9

 8.7

 8.8

 8.8

 8.6

 8.5

 8.5

 8.3

 10.2

 9.7

 10.1

 10.5

 10.8

 10.8

 10.6

 10.3

 10.1

 10.2

 10.2

 10.1

 9.9

 9.7

 9.7

 9.8

 9.9

 9.5

 9.6

 9.7

 8.3

 8.5

 8.4

 8.3

 8.3

 8.4

 8.3

 8.2

 8.2

 8.1

 7.9

 6.9

 9.4

 9.6

 10.0

 10.4

 10.3

 8.1

 9.9

 9.8

 9.9

 9.8

 9.6

 9.4

 9.3

 9.4

 9.5

 9.2

 9.2

 9.3

 9.4

 8.5

 8.7

 8.7

 8.6

 8.5

 8.6

 8.6

 8.4

 8.3

 8.3

 8.1

 9.1

 9.6

 9.9

 10.3

 10.6

 10.6

 10.2

 10.1

 10.0

 10.1

 10.0

 9.9

 9.7

 9.5

 9.5

 9.6

 9.7

 9.4

 9.5

 9.5

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

RIPON ON THE STANISLAUS RIVER

 ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS WATER TEMPERATURE, DEG DISSOLVED OXYZEN, PPM
_________________________________________ 

 

 

Order Michigan Supreme Court 

Lansing, Michigan 

October 26, 2005 Clifford W. Taylor,

 Chief Justice 

126561 Michael F. Cavanagh 

Elizabeth A. Weaver 

Marilyn Kelly 

Maura D. Corrigan 

Robert P. Young, Jr. PHOENIX INVESTMENT HOLDING 

Stephen J. Markman, COMPANY, INC., WOODLAND Justices EXCAVATING, L.L.C., and WILLACKER

HOMES, INC.,

Plaintiffs-Appellees, 

v SC: 126561 

 COA: 246398 

Oakland CC: 01-035158-CK 

NOSAN & SILVERMAN HOMES, L.L.C., 

SILVERMAN DEVELOPMENT CO.,

SILVERMAN HOMES, INC., SILVERMAN 

CONSTRUCTION CO. and TOLL 

BROTHERS, INC.,

Defendants-Appellants. 

_________________________________________/ 

On October 19, 2005, the Court heard oral argument on the application for leave to 

appeal the April 20, 2004 judgment of the Court of Appeals. On order of the Court, the 

application for leave to appeal is again considered and, pursuant to MCR 7.302(G)(1), in 

lieu of granting leave to appeal, we VACATE in part the judgment of the Court of 

Appeals and REINSTATE in part the May 7, 2002 order of the Oakland Circuit Court, as 

to plaintiffs’ Count II. The circuit court properly dismissed Count II because the 

liquidated damages provision also applied to non-monetary default, such as the failure to 

enter into excavation contracts. We REMAND this case to the Oakland Circuit Court for 

further proceedings consistent with this order and the non-vacated portion of the Court of 

Appeals judgment. 

p1019 

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

October 26, 2005 

Clerk
### Part VI—Peacekeeping Operations
### §§1271 to 1274. Omitted

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section 1271, act Apr. 30, 1946, ch. 244, title II, §221, 60 Stat. 147, which related to equality in internal taxes for Philippine products coming into the United States, was omitted on authority of former section 1345 of this title which nullified subchapter I of this chapter upon expiration of the revised agreement between the United States and the Republic of the Philippines which occurred on July 4, 1974.

Section 1272, act Apr. 30, 1946, ch. 244, title II, §222, 60 Stat. 148, related to exemption from tax of manila fiber. See note above for section 1271 of this title.

Section 1273, act Apr. 30, 1946, ch. 244, title II, §223, 60 Stat. 148, prohibited export taxes by the United States on articles exported to the Philippines. See note above for section 1271 of this title.

Section 1274, act Apr. 30, 1946, ch. 244, title II, §224, 60 Stat. 148, provided an exemption from taxes for articles for official use of the Philippine Government. See note above for section 1271 of this title.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
Exhibit  27  contains   summary   information   extracted  from  OMI  Corp.  and
subsidiaries Consolidated condensed financial statements and is qualified in its
entiretly by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1,000
<CURRENCY>                              U.S. DOLLARS
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                                   MAR-31-1997
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                1
<CASH>                                         17,042
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  11,123
<ALLOWANCES>                                   0
<INVENTORY>                                    0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               77,838
<PP&E>                                         512,370
<DEPRECIATION>                                 184,684
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 525,196
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          66,393
<BONDS>                                        153,984
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       21,405
<OTHER-SE>                                     188,886
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   525,196
<SALES>                                        0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               59,156
<CGS>                                          0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  42,865
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               10,937
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             4,120
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                4,109
<INCOME-TAX>                                   1,289
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            0
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   2,820
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  0.07
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  0.07
        


</TABLE>
##### 



EXHIBIT 31.1
 CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER
PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
  1.
    
    I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-KSB of Cereplast, Inc.;2.
    
    Based on my knowledge, this annual report does not contain any untrue statement of a material
fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the
circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period
covered by this annual report;3.
    
    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in
this quarterly report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of
operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this annual
report;4.
    
    The registrants other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing and
maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and
15d-15(e)) and internal controls over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules
13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and have:
 a)
    
    designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and
procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to
the a registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within
those entities, particularly during the period in which this quarterly report is being prepared;b)
    
    evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures and presented
in b this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures,
as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation;c)
    
    disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over financial
reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter that has materially
affected, or c is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control over
financial reporting;
 5.
    
    The registrants other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most recent
evaluation, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of registrants board of directors
(or persons performing the equivalent function):
 a)
    
    all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal controls which could
adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial data
and have identified for the registrants auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; andb)
    
    any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a
significant role in the registrants internal controls; and
 Dated: March 29, 2007
    By:
    /s/ Frederic ScheerFrederic Scheer, President, ChiefExecutive Officer, Principal Financial/
Accounting Officer and Director
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

DAY ELEVATION

 238.86

 238.85

 238.87

 238.89

 238.91

 238.94

 238.98

 238.94

 238.94

 238.94

 238.94

 238.93

 238.94

 238.94

 238.93

 238.94

 238.91

 238.91

 238.96

 239.05

 238.86

 239.01

 239.04

 239.27

 239.25

 239.13

 239.07

 238.69

 238.68

 238.65

 336

 335

 337

 339

 341

 344

 348

 344

 344

 344

 344

 343

 344

 344

 343

 344

 341

 341

 346

 356

 336

 351

 355

 382

 380

 366

 358

 318

 317

 314

STORAGE

+0

-1

+2

+2

+2

+3

+4

-4

+0

+0

+0

-1

+1

+0

-1

+1

-3

+0

+5

+10

-20

+15

+4

+27

-2

-14

-8

-40

-1

-3

CHANGE

 182

 177

 180

 157

 182

 92

 89

 91

 25

 92

 91

 91

 92

 84

 89

 172

 182

 151

 93

 93

 89

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 7,620

 7,590

 7,640

 7,700

 7,680

 7,860

 7,780

 7,760

 7,720

 7,760

 7,720

 7,740

 7,740

 7,780

 8,530

 8,610

 8,510

 8,530

 8,550

 8,720

 8,230

 8,630

 8,680

 9,420

 9,320

 8,920

 8,780

 7,700

 7,640

 7,610

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

NOVEMBER 2011 RED BLUFF DIVERSION RESERVOIR DAILY OPERATIONS RUN DATE: February 7, 2012

IN LAKE

CANAL

 ACRE-FEET

TOTALS -22 2,494 244,470

ACRE-FEET -22 4,947 484,906

SUMMARY

RELEASE (ACRE-FEET)

TOTAL 490,053

 336

RELEASE

RIVER

CORNING TO SACTO

CANAL

RELEASE C.F.S

TEHAMA

COLUSA

 0

 0

 0

 30

 0

 0

 0

 0

 64

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 5

 2

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 101

 200

CORNING CANAL 200

TEHAMA-COLUSA CANAL 4,947

TO SACTO RIVER 484,906

Table 9
§ 404.915 Disability hearing—disability hearing officers. ( a ) *General.* Your disability hearing will be conducted by a disability hearing officer who was not involved in making the determination you are appealing. The disability hearing officer will be an experienced disability examiner, regardless of whether he or she is appointed by a State agency or by the Associate Commissioner for Disability Determinations or his or her delegate, as described in paragraphs (b) and (c) of this section.
( b ) *State agency hearing officers* — ( 1 ) *Appointment of State agency hearing officers.* If a State agency made the initial or revised determination that you are appealing, the disability hearing officer who conducts your disability hearing may be appointed by a State agency. If the disability hearing officer is appointed by a State agency, that individual will be employed by an adjudicatory unit of the State agency other than the adjudicatory unit which made the determination you are appealing.
( 2 ) *State agency* defined. For purposes of this subpart, *State agency* means the adjudicatory component in the State which issues disability determinations.
( c ) *Federal hearing officers.* The disability hearing officer who conducts your disability hearing will be appointed by the Associate Commissioner for Disability Determinations or his or her delegate if: ( 1 ) A component of our office other than a State agency made the determination you are appealing; or
( 2 ) The State agency does not appoint a disability hearing officer to conduct your disability hearing under paragraph (b) of this section.
[51 FR 301, Jan. 3, 1986, as amended at 71 FR 10428, Mar. 1, 2006]
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF

THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with this Amendment No. 1 to the annual report on Form 10-K/A of Ruths Hospitality Group, Inc. (the Company) for the year ended
December 28, 2008, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), the undersigned, the President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350,
as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the
requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in
the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Date: June 25, 2009



By

/S/    MICHAEL P.
ODONNELLMichael P. ODonnellPresident and Chief Executive Officer of Ruths Hospitality Group, Inc.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              SEP-30-1997
<PERIOD-START>                                 OCT-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                                   MAR-31-1997
<CASH>                                         32,608
<SECURITIES>                                   25,593
<RECEIVABLES>                                  126,790
<ALLOWANCES>                                   2,049
<INVENTORY>                                    0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               149,817
<PP&E>                                         49,498
<DEPRECIATION>                                 39,071
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 232,715
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          96,915
<BONDS>                                        0
<COMMON>                                       20
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<OTHER-SE>                                     99,218
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   232,715
<SALES>                                        46,451
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               46,451
<CGS>                                          0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  7,512
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               43,665
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             899
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (2,498)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   (195)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (2,303)
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (2,303)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  (0.13)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  (0.13)
        

</TABLE>
### §481. Repealed. June 17, 1930, ch. 497, title IV, §651(a)(1), 46 Stat. 762, eff. June 18, 1930

Section, act Sept. 21, 1922, ch. 356, title IV, §581, 42 Stat. 979, related to seizure of vessel or merchandise. Corresponding provisions of Tariff Act of 1930, see section 1581 of this title.
Order entered April 21, 2014

In The

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-14-00214-CR

ANTHONY SMITH, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the 292nd Judicial District Court

Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. F12-71255-V

ORDER

The Court ORDERS the Dallas County District Clerk to file the clerk’s record in this 

appeal within TWENTY-ONE DAYS of the date of this order.

We DIRECT the Clerk to send copies of this order, by electronic transmission, to Gary 

Fitzsimmons, Dallas County District Clerk; the Dallas County District Clerk’s Office, Criminal 

Records Division; and to counsel for all parties.

/s/ LANA MYERS

JUSTICE
Editorial Note on Part 478
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 478 appear by T.D. ATF-411, 64 FR 17291, Apr. 9, 1999, T.D. ATF-487, 68 FR 3750, Jan. 24, 2003, and ATF-11F, 73 FR 57240, Oct. 2, 2008.

§ 478.21 Forms prescribed. ( a ) The Director is authorized to prescribe all forms required by this part. All of the information called for in each form shall be furnished as indicated by the headings on the form and the instructions on or pertaining to the form. In addition, information called for in each form shall be furnished as required by this part.
( b ) Requests for forms should be submitted to the ATF Distribution Center (*http://www.atf.gov*) or made by calling (202) 648-6420.
(5 U.S.C. 552(a); 80 Stat. 383, as amended)
[T.D. ATF-92, 46 FR 46915, Sept. 23, 1981, as amended by T.D. ATF-249, 52 FR 5962, Feb. 27, 1987; T.D. ATF-270, 53 FR 10492, Mar. 31, 1988; T.D. 372, 61 FR 20724, May 8, 1996; ATF-11F, 73 FR 57240, Oct. 2, 2008; ATF 2013R-9F, 79 FR 46692, Aug. 11, 2014]
(No. 4028

#### Della N. Corcoran, widow, et al., Claimant, *vs.*State of Illinois, Respondent.

*Supplemental opinion filed April 18, 1950.*

Roscoe Bonjean, Attorney for Claimant.

Ivan A. Elliott, Attorney General; C. Arthur Nebel, Assistant Attorney General, for Respondent.

SCHUMAN, C. J.

An award was entered in this case in an opinion •filed November 12, 1947. At the time of the award, the claimant, Della N. Corcoran, widow of Edward J. Cor- ■ coran, deceased, and the deceased had one child under 16 years of age. This child was 16 on January 8, 1948, .and reached the age of 18 years on January 8, 1950. *160Under the terms and provisions of the Compensation Act that when an award has been made, where the deceased left at the time of his death a widow and one child under 16 years of age him surviving, the compensation payments of death benefits to the extent same were increased because of the existence of said child, insofar as they have not been paid, shall come and become extinguished when said child arrives at the age of 18 years, if said child is physically and mentally competent at that time. It has been brought to the attention of the Court that said child is now 18 years of age as of January 8, 1950, and that said child, insofar as the Court knows, is physically and mentally sound and not in any way mentally incapacitated or mentally incompetent.

At the time when the child became 18 years of age, approximately .478 of the award had been paid; .478 of $540.00, the increase for the child, would amount to $258.12, which has accrued and should be added to the $4,800.00 award to the widow, making a total of $5,058.12. Deducting the sum of $2,556.00, already paid, leaves a balance of $2,502.12 to be paid. The award is therefore modified and said sum of $2,502.12 is to be paid at the-rate of $18.00 for 138 weeks and one final payment of $18.12.

All future payments being subject to the terms and. conditions of the Workmen’s Compensation Act of Illinois, jurisdiction of this cause is specifically further-reserved for the entry of such further orders as may-from time to time be necessary.