alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
### §360e–4. Predetermined change control plans for devices

#### (a) Approved devices

#### (1) In general

Notwithstanding section 360e(d)(5)(A) of this title, a supplemental application shall not be required for a change to a device approved under section 360e of this title, if such change is consistent with a predetermined change control plan that is approved pursuant to paragraph (2).

#### (2) Predetermined change control plan

The Secretary may approve a predetermined change control plan submitted in an application, including a supplemental application, under section 360e of this title that describes planned changes that may be made to the device (and that would otherwise require a supplemental application under section 360e of this title), if the device remains safe and effective without any change.

#### (3) Scope

The Secretary may require that a change control plan include labeling required for safe and effective use of the device as such device changes pursuant to such plan, notification requirements if the device does not function as intended pursuant to such plan, and performance requirements for changes made under the plan.

#### (b) Cleared devices

#### (1) In general

Notwithstanding section 360(k) of this title, a premarket notification shall not be required for a change to a device cleared under section 360(k) of this title, if such change is consistent with an established predetermined change control plan granted pursuant to paragraph (2).

#### (2) Predetermined change control plan

The Secretary may clear a predetermined change control plan submitted in a notification submitted under section 360(k) of this title that describes planned changes that may be made to the device (and that would otherwise require a new notification), if—

(A) the device remains safe and effective without any such change; and

(B) the device would remain substantially equivalent to the predicate.

#### (3) Scope

The Secretary may require that a change control plan include labeling required for safe and effective use of the device as such device changes pursuant to such plan, notification requirements if the device does not function as intended pursuant to such plan, and performance requirements for changes made under the plan.

#### (c) Predicate devices

In making a determination of substantial equivalence pursuant to section 360c(i) of this title, the Secretary shall not compare a device to changed versions of a device implemented in accordance with an established predetermined change control plan as a predicate device. Only the version of the device cleared or approved, prior to changes made under the predetermined change control plan, may be used by a sponsor as a predicate device.

(June 25, 1938, ch. 675, §515C, as added Pub. L. 117–328, div. FF, title III, §3308(a), Dec. 29, 2022, 136 Stat. 5835.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Prior Provisions

A prior section 515C of act June 25, 1938, was renumbered section 515B and is classified to section 360e–3 of this title.
#### § 404.1340 Wage credits for World War II and post-World War II veterans.

In determining your entitlement to, and the amount of, your monthly benefit or lump-sum death payment based on your active service during the World War II period or the post-World War II period, and for establishing a period of disability as discussed in §§ 404.132 and 404.133, we add the (deemed) amount of $160 for each month during a part of which you were in the active service as described in § 404.1312 or § 404.1322. For example, if you were in active service from October 11, 1942, through August 10, 1943, we add the (deemed) amount of $160 for October 1942 and August 1943 as well as November 1942 through July 1943. The amount of wage credits that are added in a calendar year cannot cause the total amount credited to your earnings record to exceed the annual earnings limitation explained in §§ 404.1047 and 404.1096(b).
I 

114TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 4068 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to permanently increase the 

limitations on the deduction for start-up and organizational expenditures. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

NOVEMBER 18, 2015 

Mrs. LAWRENCE (for herself, Ms. VELA ́ZQUEZ, Ms. CLARKE of New York, and 

Mr. PAYNE) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Ways and Means 

A BILL 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to permanently 

increase the limitations on the deduction for start-up 

and organizational expenditures. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Promote Startups Act 

5 of 2015’’. 

6 SEC. 2. PERMANENT INCREASE OF LIMITATION ON DEDUC7 TION FOR START-UP AND ORGANIZATIONAL 

8 EXPENDITURES. 

9 (a) START-UP EXPENDITURES.— 


tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 4068 IH

1 (1) IN GENERAL.—Section 195(b)(1)(A)(ii) of 

2 the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 is amended— 

3 (A) by striking ‘‘$5,000’’ and inserting 

4 ‘‘$15,000’’, and 

5 (B) by striking ‘‘$50,000’’ and inserting 

6 ‘‘$150,000’’. 

7 (2) CONFORMING AMENDMENT.—Section 

8 195(b) of such Code is amended by striking para9 graph (3). 

10 (b) ORGANIZATIONAL EXPENDITURES.—Section 

11 248(a)(1)(B) of such Code is amended— 

12 (1) by striking ‘‘$5,000’’ and inserting 

13 ‘‘$10,000’’, and 

14 (2) by striking ‘‘$50,000’’ and inserting 

15 ‘‘$60,000’’. 

16 (c) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendments made by 

17 this section shall apply to amounts paid or incurred with 

18 respect to— 

19 (1) in the case of the amendments made by 

20 subsection (a), trades or businesses beginning in tax21 able years beginning after December 31, 2014, and 

22 (2) in the case of the amendments made by 

23 subsection (b), corporations the business of which 

24 begins in taxable years beginning after such date. 

Æ 


tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY HIGH

 20,950

 19,637

 17,721

 17,104

 17,923

 18,465

 21,531

 22,735

 23,420

 23,751

 25,931

 26,636

 25,771

 24,935

 24,246

 22,404

 20,084

 19,414

 20,960

 21,763

 22,525

 22,424

 22,215

 21,901

 21,363

 21,518

 21,516

 20,982

 20,214

 19,313

 18,687

 7,561

 7,138

 7,384

 7,397

 6,427

 6,480

 8,052

 8,502

 8,477

 7,772

 8,292

 9,479

 8,863

 8,976

 8,522

 8,064

 7,656

 7,583

 8,445

 9,542

 9,119

 8,463

 7,323

 7,212

 6,889

 7,015

 7,169

 7,058

 6,836

 6,738

 5,944

 14,681

 13,987

 13,696

 13,018

 11,734

 11,646

 12,711

 13,991

 14,751

 15,427

 16,796

 17,344

 16,970

 16,803

 16,355

 15,431

 14,568

 13,855

 14,017

 14,032

 14,099

 13,965

 13,877

 14,021

 13,896

 14,124

 14,113

 13,813

 13,717

 13,611

 13,234

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

JULY 2018 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: August 2, 2018

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

PORT CHICAGO BOTTOM IN SUISUN BAY
### §14a. Transferred

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section, act June 30, 1906, ch. 3915, §10A, as added June 22, 1934, ch. 712, 48 Stat. 1204, and amended, which related to examination of sea food on request of packer, marking of food with results, fees, and penalties, was successively renumbered section 702A and then 706 of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act by act July 12, 1943, ch. 221, title II, §201, 57 Stat. 500, and by Pub. L. 102–571, title I, §106(3), Oct. 29, 1992, 106 Stat. 4498, and was successively classified to section 372a and then 376 of this title.
|   | (1) | The      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;and |
|--------|-----|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | (2) | The      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the      Fund. |
|--------|-----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   |                |   |   |   | RIDGEWOOD      ENERGY P FUND, LLC                    |
|--------|---------------------|--------|--------|--------|-----------------------------------------------------------|
| Dated: | March      11, 2010 | By:    |   | /s/    | ROBERT      E. SWANSON                                    |
|   |                |   |   | Name:  | Robert      E. Swanson                                    |
|   |                |   |   | Title: | Chief      Executive Officer                              |
|   |                |   |   |   | (Principal      Executive Officer)                        |
|   |                |   |   |   |                                                      |
|   |                |   |   |   |                                                      |
| Dated: | March      11, 2010 | By:    |   | /s/    | KATHLEEN      P. MCSHERRY                                 |
|   |                |   |   | Name:  | Kathleen      P. McSherry                                 |
|   |                |   |   | Title: | Executive      Vice President and Chief Financial Officer |
|   |                |   |   |   | (Principal      Financial and Accounting Officer)         |
|   |                |   |   |   |                                                      |
|   |                |   |   |   |                                                      |

----
§ 404.1048 Contribution and benefit base after 1992. ( a ) *General.* The contribution and benefit base after 1992 is figured under the formula described in paragraph (b) of this section in any calendar year in which there is an automatic cost-of-living increase in old-age, survivors, and disability insurance benefits. For purposes of this section, the calendar year in which the contribution and benefit base is figured is called the determination year. The base figured in the determination year applies to wages paid after (and taxable years beginning after) the determination year.
( b ) *Formula for figuring the contribution and benefit base.* For wages paid after (and taxable years beginning after) the determination year, the contribution and benefit base is the larger of— ( 1 ) The contribution and benefit base in effect for the determination year; or
( 2 ) The amount determined by— ( i ) Multiplying the contribution and benefit base in effect for the determination year by the ratio of— ( A ) The average of the total wages (as described in paragraph (c) of this section) reported to the Secretary of the Treasury for the calendar year before the determination year to
( B ) The average of the total wages reported to the Secretary of the Treasury for the calendar year before the most recent calendar year in which an increase in the contribution and benefit base was enacted or a determination under this section resulting in an increase of the base was made; and
( ii ) Rounding the result of the multiplication, if not a multiple of $300, to— ( A ) The nearest multiple of $300; or
( B ) The next higher multiple of $300 if the result is a multiple of $150.
( c ) *Average of the total wages.* The average of the total wages means the amount equal to all remuneration reported as wages on Form W-2 to the Internal Revenue Service for all employees for income tax purposes plus contributions to certain deferred compensation plans described in section 209(k) of the Social Security Act (also reported on Form W-2), divided by the number of wage earners. If both distributions from and contributions to any such deferred compensation plan are reported on Form W-2, we will include only the contributions in the calculation of the average of the total wages. The reported remuneration and deferred compensation contributions include earnings from work not covered under social security and earnings from work covered under social security that are more than the annual wage limitation described in § 404.1047.
[45 FR 20075, Mar. 27, 1980, as amended at 55 FR 7309, Mar. 1, 1990; 57 FR 1382, Jan. 14, 1992]
#### § 404.1680 Notice of right to hearing on proposed finding of substantial failure.

If, following the mandatory performance support period and the 3-month adjustment period, a State agency again falls below two of three threshold levels (one being performance accuracy) in two consecutive quarters in the succeeding 12 months, we will notify the State in writing that we will find that the State agency has substantially failed to meet our standards unless the State submits a written request for a hearing with the Department of Health and Human Services' Departmental Appeals Board within 30 days after receiving the notice. The notice will identify the threshold levels that were not met by the State agency, the period during which the thresholds were not met and the accuracy and processing time levels attained by the State agency during this period. If a hearing is not requested, the State agency will be found to have substantially failed to meet our standards, and we will implement our plans to assume the disability determination function.

[56 FR 11021, Mar. 14, 1991]
Exhibit 13.1



CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT
OF 2002



I, Ion G. Varouxakis, Chief Executive
Officer of FreeSeas Inc. (the “Company”), hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant
to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:



| | 1. | the amended Annual Report on Form 20-F/A of the
    Company     for the year ended December 31, 2012 (the “Annual Report”) fully complies with the requirements of
    Section 13(a)     or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
| | -- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | the information contained in the amended Annual Report fairly
    presents     in all material respects the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | -- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | By:    | /s/ ION
    G. VAROUXAKIS
| | ------ | -------------------------
| | Name:  | Ion G. Varouxakis        
| | Title: | Chief Executive Officer  
| | Date:  | June 7, 2013             



This written statement is being
furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission as an exhibit to the Company’s amended Annual Report on Form
20-F/A. A signed original of this statement has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and
furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.



This certification accompanies
this amended Annual Report on Form 20-F/A pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to
the extent required by such Act, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934, as amended (the "Exchange Act"). Such certification will not be deemed to be incorporated by reference into
any filing under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Exchange Act, except to the extent that the Company
specifically incorporates it by reference.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY ELEVATION

 239.23

 239.23

 240.49

 252.50

 252.45

 252.40

 252.43

 252.40

 252.57

 239.47

 239.47

 239.60

 239.62

 239.62

 240.40

 252.57

 252.59

 252.49

 252.42

 252.56

 252.54

 252.56

 252.62

 252.55

 252.48

 252.45

 252.55

 252.53

 252.47

 252.52

 252.45

 378

 378

 538

 3,924

 3,899

 3,874

 3,889

 3,874

 3,958

 406

 406

 422

 424

 424

 525

 3,958

 3,968

 3,919

 3,884

 3,953

 3,943

 3,953

 3,983

 3,948

 3,914

 3,899

 3,948

 3,938

 3,909

 3,933

 3,899

STORAGE

-1

+0

+160

+3,386

-25

-25

+15

-15

+84

-3,552

+0

+16

+2

+0

+101

+3,433

+10

-49

-35

+69

-10

+10

+30

-35

-34

-15

+49

-10

-29

+24

-34

CHANGE

 435

 462

 450

 752

 883

 908

 419

 609

 999

 425

 432

 423

 424

 444

 430

 965

 1,428

 466

 1,112

 1,249

 811

 722

 720

 655

 878

 931

 908

 516

 862

 928

 913

 9,345

 9,510

 12,762

 12,378

 9,558

 9,510

 9,750

 9,102

 20,478

 9,725

 9,725

 10,125

 10,325

 10,325

 9,294

 10,242

 8,286

 8,418

 8,166

 8,910

 9,174

 9,306

 9,462

 9,342

 8,814

 8,502

 9,846

 9,930

 9,894

 9,618

 9,162

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

MAY 2007 RED BLUFF DIVERSION RESERVOIR DAILY OPERATIONS RUN DATE: June 26, 2007

IN LAKE

CANAL

 ACRE-FEET

TOTALS +3,520 22,559 308,984

ACRE-FEET +3,520 44,746 612,870

SUMMARY

RELEASE (ACRE-FEET)

TOTAL 660,367

 379

RELEASE

RIVER

CORNING TO SACTO

CANAL

RELEASE C.F.S.

TEHAMA

COLUSA

 36

 30

 24

 23

 21

 17

 21

 30

 29

 49

 49

 62

 52

 39

 46

 76

 65

 63

 53

 61

 55

 41

 42

 50

 24

 61

 70

 35

 27

 50

 86

 1,387

 2,751

CORNING CANAL 2,751

TEHAMA-COLUSA CANAL 44,746

TO SACTO RIVER 612,870

Table 9
§ 10.541 What action will OWCP take after issuing written notice of its intention to reduce or terminate compensation? ( a ) If the beneficiary submits evidence or argument prior to the issuance of the decision, OWCP will evaluate it in light of the proposed action and undertake such further development as it may deem appropriate, if any. Evidence or argument which is repetitious, cumulative, or irrelevant will not require any further development. If the beneficiary does not respond within 30 days of the written notice, OWCP will issue a decision consistent with its prior notice. OWCP will not grant any request for an extension of this 30-day period.
( b ) Evidence or argument which refutes the evidence upon which the proposed action was based will result in the continued payment of compensation. If the beneficiary submits evidence or argument which fails to refute the evidence upon which the proposed action was based but which requires further development, OWCP will not provide the beneficiary with another notice of its proposed action upon completion of such development. Once any further development of the evidence is completed, OWCP will either continue payment or issue a decision consistent with its prior notice.
**Exhibit 31.1****CERTIFICATIONS**I, Jeff D. Morris, certify that:     1. I have reviewed this Annual Report on Form 10-K of Alon USA Energy, Inc.;     2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a materialfact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of thecircumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this report;     3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information includedin this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results ofoperations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;     4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:     a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosurecontrols and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that materialinformation relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is madeknown to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which thisreport is being prepared;     b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and proceduresand presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosurecontrols and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on suchevaluation; and     c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (theregistrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materiallyaffected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal controlover financial reporting; and     5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the auditcommittee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):     a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation ofinternal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affectthe registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and     b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees whohave a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.Date:March 14, 2006       /s/ Jeff D. Morris Jeff D. Morris    President and Chief Executive Officer
[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 75 (Tuesday, April 19, 2011)]
[Notices]
[Page 21917]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2011-9565]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

NATIONAL TRANSPORTATION SAFETY BOARD


Sunshine Act Meeting

TIME AND DATE: 9:30 a.m., Tuesday, April 26, 2011.

PLACE: NTSB Conference Center, 429 L'Enfant Plaza, SW., Washington, DC 
20594.

STATUS: The ONE item is open to the public.

MATTER TO BE CONSIDERED: 
    8093A Aviation Accident Report Crash During Unstabilized Approach, 
Empire Airlines Flight 8284, Avions de Transport R[eacute]gional 
Aerospatiale Alenia ATR 42 320, N902FX, Lubbock, Texas, January 27, 
2009.

NEWS MEDIA CONTACT: Telephone: (202) 314-6100.
    The press and public may enter the NTSB Conference Center one hour 
prior to the meeting for set up and seating.
    Individuals requesting specific accommodations should contact 
Rochelle Hall at (202) 314-6305 by Friday, April 22, 2011.
    The public may view the meeting via a live or archived webcast by 
accessing a link under ``News & Events'' on the NTSB home page at 
http://www.ntsb.gov.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Candi Bing, (202) 314-6403 or by e-
mail at <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#77151e191014371903041559101801"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="d4b6bdbab3b794baa0a7b6fab3bba2">[email protected]</span></a>.

    Dated: April 15, 2011.
Candi R. Bing,
Federal Register Liaison Officer.
[FR Doc. 2011-9565 Filed 4-15-11; 4:15 pm]
BILLING CODE 7533-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>