alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 404.2024 How do we investigate a representative payee applicant? Before selecting an individual or organization to act as your representative payee, we will perform an investigation. ( a ) *Nature of the investigation.* As part of the investigation, we do the following: ( 1 ) Conduct a face-to-face interview with the payee applicant unless it is impracticable as explained in paragraph (c) of this section.
( 2 ) Require the payee applicant to submit documented proof of identity, unless information establishing identity has recently been submitted with an application for title II, VIII or XVI benefits.
( 3 ) Verify the payee applicant's Social Security account number or employer identification number.
( 4 ) Determine whether the payee applicant has been convicted of a violation of section 208, 811 or 1632 of the Social Security Act.
( 5 ) Determine whether the payee applicant has previously served as a representative payee and if any previous appointment as payee was revoked or terminated for misusing title II, VIII or XVI benefits.
( 6 ) Use our records to verify the payee applicant's employment and/or direct receipt of title II, VIII, or XVI benefits.
( 7 ) Verify the payee applicant's concern for the beneficiary with the beneficiary's custodian or other interested person.
( 8 ) Require the payee applicant to provide adequate information showing his or her relationship to the beneficiary and to describe his or her responsibility for the care of the beneficiary.
( 9 ) Determine whether the payee applicant is a creditor of the beneficiary (see § 404.2022(e)).
( 10 ) Conduct a criminal background check on the individual payee applicant.
( b ) *Subsequent face-to-face interviews.* After holding a face-to-face interview with a payee applicant, subsequent face-to-face interviews are not required if that applicant continues to be qualified and currently is acting as a payee, unless we determine, within our discretion, that a new face-to-face interview is necessary. We base this decision on the payee's past performance and knowledge of and compliance with our reporting requirements.
( c ) *Impracticable.* We may consider a face-to-face interview impracticable if it would cause the payee applicant undue hardship. For example, the payee applicant would have to travel a great distance to the field office. In this situation, we may conduct the investigation to determine the payee applicant's suitability to serve as a representative payee without a face-to-face interview.
[69 FR 60233, Oct. 7, 2004, as amended at 73 FR 66521, Nov. 10, 2008; 84 FR 4325, Feb. 15, 2019; 84 FR 57319, Oct. 25, 2019]
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY HIGH

 143

 141

 143

 146

 194

 213

 153

 148

 149

 149

 156

 434

 736

 1,414

 1,671

 1,365

 1,068

 1,403

 809

 513

 467

 388

 285

 303

 338

 285

 324

 937

 1,473

 1,531

 843

 131

 136

 136

 137

 130

 144

 142

 142

 143

 145

 148

 149

 150

 154

 165

 182

 196

 200

 213

 192

 189

 199

 195

 190

 190

 188

 188

 189

 195

 195

 209

 139

 139

 139

 140

 146

 153

 146

 144

 145

 147

 150

 164

 218

 303

 353

 396

 364

 388

 327

 259

 255

 245

 220

 215

 211

 208

 213

 265

 353

 399

 320

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

JANUARY 2011 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: February 2, 2011

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

PITTSBURG TOP ON THE SACRAMENTO RIVER
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                       5
       
<S>				<C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>			3-mos
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>               Dec-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>			Mar-31-1997
<CASH>				518,762
<SECURITIES>                    000
<RECEIVABLES>			47,041
<ALLOWANCES>			000
<INVENTORY>			000
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                579,836
<PP&E>				000
<DEPRECIATION>			000
<TOTAL-ASSETS>			5,755,240
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>		469,441
<BONDS>				000
<COMMON>                        000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>		000
<PREFERRED>                     000
<OTHER-SE>                      5,285,799
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>	5,755,240
<SALES>				000
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                523,008
<CGS>				000
<TOTAL-COSTS>			000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                151,161
<LOSS-PROVISION>                000
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>		000
<INCOME-PRETAX>			371,847
<INCOME-TAX>			000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>		371,847
<DISCONTINUED>			000
<EXTRAORDINARY>			000
<CHANGES>                       000
<NET-INCOME>			371,847
<EPS-PRIMARY>			23.55
<EPS-DILUTED>			23.55
        

</TABLE>
### §1766. Omitted

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section, act Aug. 26, 1954, ch. 937, ch. IV, §514, 68 Stat. 854, related to reservation of foreign currencies or credits owed to or by the United States by the Secretary of the Treasury for sale to the Department of State for international educational exchange activities on basis of dollar value at time of reservation. See sections 2362 and 2455 of this title.
EXHIBIT 32.1
                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

The undersigned Richard Starke, President of Lotus Capital Corp. hereby
certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) the quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of Lotus Capital Corp. for the period
ended June 30, 2005 (the "Report") fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Lotus Capital
Corp.


Dated: August 17, 2005

/s/ Richard Starke
------------------
Richard Starke
President
(Principal Executive Officer)
#### Curtis E. CRAWFORD, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. UNITED STATES, Defendant-Appellee.

No. 2006-5078.

United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit.

June 22, 2006.

Curtis E. Crawford, pro se.

*ORDER*

Curtis E. Crawford submits correspondence stating “I withdraw my case.” We treat Crawford’s submission as a motion to dismiss his appeal of the March 1, 2006 judgment of the United States Court of Federal Claims in *Crawford v. United States,*No. 06-CV-110.

Upon consideration thereof,

IT IS ORDERED THAT:

(1) The unopposed motion to dismiss the appeal is granted.

(2) Each side shall bear its own costs.
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent

except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 02-10469

Conference Calendar

 

OZIEL GONZALEZ MARTINEZ,

Petitioner-Appellant,

versus

SAM PRATT, Warden,

Respondent-Appellee.

--------------------

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Northern District of Texas

USDC No. 3:02-CV-91-R

--------------------

October 30, 2002

Before DeMOSS, BENAVIDES, and STEWART, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Ozeil Gonzalez Martinez, federal prisoner # 75159-9000, was

convicted in 1993 of conspiracy to import at least one kilogram

of heroin, conspiracy to possess with intent to distribute at

least one kilogram of heroin, and several counts of possession

with intent to distribute heroin. He appeals the district

court’s denial of his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 petition, wherein he

argued that his sentence of concurrent terms of 210 months’
No. 02-10469

-2-

imprisonment for each count was in violation of Apprendi v. New

Jersey, 530 U.S. 466 (2000), because his sentences were based

upon six kilograms of heroin. 

The district court determined that Martinez had not met the

requirements of 28 U.S.C. § 2255's savings clause and that

Martinez could not raise his claim in a 28 U.S.C. § 2241

petition. His sentences were below the lowest statutory maximum

for his convictions. See 21 U.S.C. § 841(b)(1)(C). There was no

Apprendi violation. See United States v. Clinton, 256 F.3d 311,

314 (5th Cir.), cert denied, 122 S. Ct. 492 (2001); United States

v. Doggett, 230 F.3d 160, 166 (5th Cir. 2000), cert. denied, 531

U.S. 1177 (2001). Further, the district court’s determination

that Apprendi does not apply retroactively to cases on collateral

review and that an Apprendi claim does not satisfy the

requirements of 28 U.S.C. § 2255's savings clause was correct. 

See Wesson v. U.S. Penitentiary, Beaumont, TX, 305 F.3d 343 (5th

Cir. 2002). 

AFFIRMED.
§ 220.52 Failure to appear at a consultative examination. ( a ) *General.* The Board may find that the claimant is not disabled if he or she does not have good reason for failing or refusing to take part in a consultative examination or test which was arranged by the Board. If the individual is already receiving an annuity and does not have a good reason for failing or refusing to take part in a consultative examination or test which the Board arranged, the Board may determine that the individual's disability has stopped because of his or her failure or refusal. The claimant for whom an examination or test has been scheduled should notify the Board as soon as possible before the scheduled date of the examination or test if he or she has any reason why he or she cannot go to the examination or test. If the Board finds that the claimant has a good reason for failure to appear, another examination or test will be scheduled.
( b ) *Examples of good reasons for failure to appear.* Some examples of good reasons for not going to a scheduled examination or test include— ( 1 ) Illness on the date of the scheduled examination or test;
( 2 ) Failure to receive notice or timely notice of an examination or test;
( 3 ) Receipt of incorrect or incomplete information about the examination or test; or
( 4 ) A death or serious illness in the claimant's immediate family.
( c ) *Objections by a claimant's physician.* The Board should be notified immediately if the claimant is advised by his or her treating physician not to take an examination or test. In some cases, the Board may be able to secure the information which is needed in another way or the treating physician may agree to another type of examination for the same purpose.
§ 404.330 Who is entitled to wife's or husband's benefits. You are entitled to benefits as the wife or husband of an insured person who is entitled to old-age or disability benefits if— ( a ) You are the insured's wife or husband based upon a relationship described in §§ 404.345 through 404.346 and one of the following conditions is met: ( 1 ) Your relationship to the insured as a wife or husband has lasted at least 1 year. (You will be considered to meet the 1-year duration requirement throughout the month in which the first anniversary of the marriage occurs.)
( 2 ) You and the insured are the natural parents of a child; or
( 3 ) In the month before you married the insured you were entitled to, or if you had applied and been old enough you could have been entitled to, any of these benefits or payments: Wife's, husband's, widow's, widower's, or parent's benefits; disabled child's benefits; or annuity payments under the Railroad Retirement Act for widows, widowers, parents, or children 18 years old or older;
( b ) You apply;
( c ) You are age 62 or older throughout a month and you meet all other conditions of entitlement, or you are the insured's wife or husband and have *in your care* (as defined in §§ 404.348 through 404.349), throughout a month in which all other conditions of entitlement are met, a child who is entitled to child's benefits on the insured's earnings record and the child is either under age 16 or disabled; and
( d ) You are not entitled to an old-age or disability benefit based upon a primary insurance amount that is equal to or larger than the full wife's or husband's benefit.
[44 FR 34481, June 15, 1979; 44 FR 56691, Oct. 2, 1979, as amended at 45 FR 68932, Oct. 17, 1980; 48 FR 21926, May 16, 1983]
(No. 74-CC-266

#### St. Elizabeth Hospital, Claimant, *vs.*State of Illinois, Department of Mental Health, Respondent.

*Opinion filed February 14, 1974.*

St. Elizabeth Hospital, Claimant, pro se.

William J. Scott, Attorney General; Howard W. Feldman, Assistant Attorney General, for Respondent.

Per Curiam.
USGS HomeContact USGSSearch USGS

Open-File Report 2014-1203

### Maps Showing Bathymetry and Modern Sediment Thickness on the Inner Continental Shelf Offshore of Fire Island, New York, Pre-Hurricane Sandy

----

/     Title Page /        List of Figures /        Conversion Factors /        Abstract /        Introduction /        Geologic Setting     /       Methods     /       Data Catalog /       Acknowledgments  /        References Cited /        Index /         

----

AccessibilityFOIAPrivacyPolicies and Notices

U.S. Department of the Interior |            U.S. Geological Survey                                                URL: http://pubs.usgs.gov/of/2014/1203/ofr2014-1203-figure7.html            Page Contact Information: GS Pubs Web Contact                        Page Last Modified: Friday, November 07, 2014, 12:37:06 PM
EXHIBIT 32.1


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                 SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


     In  connection  with this Annual  Report of Morgan Creek Energy Corp.  (the
"Company") on Form 10-KSB/A for the year ending December 31, 2007, as filed with
the Securities  and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the  "Report"),  I,
Peter Wilson,  President and I, D. Bruce Horton, Chief Financial Officer, of the
Company, certify to the best of our knowledge,  pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Sec. 1350,
as adopted pursuant to Sec. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1)  The Report fully complies with the  requirements  of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
     of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)  The information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in all material
     respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.


Date: September 30, 2008
                                          /s/ PETER WILSON
                                          _____________________________________
                                              Peter Wilson
                                              President


                                          /s/ D. BRUCE HORTON
                                          _____________________________________
                                              D. Bruce Horton
                                              Chief Financial Officer
### Part A—Allowances and Special Allotments
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1998
<CASH>                                       1,348,027
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   52,796
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                      24,117,632
<DEPRECIATION>                            (12,302,036)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              14,240,871
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0
<BONDS>                                     12,421,259
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                 (4,212,714)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                14,240,871
<SALES>                                      4,394,825
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             5,305,595
<CGS>                                        2,312,685
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                3,360,825
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               826,838
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           1,229,824
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              1,686,868
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          (129,284)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                              1,816,152
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 1,686,868
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
### §211. Preservation of originals of prescriptions compounded and copies thereof; inspection of prescriptions by consular officers; marking containers of drugs

Every person, firm, or corporation whose permanent allegiance is due to the United States owning, partly owning, or managing a drug store or pharmacy shall keep in his place of business a suitable book or file, in which shall be preserved for a period of not less than three years the original of every prescription compounded or dispensed at such store or pharmacy, or a copy of such prescription, except when the preservation of the original is required by section 207 or 208 of this title. Upon request the owner, part owner, or manager of such store shall furnish to the prescribing physician, or to the person for whom such prescription was compounded or dispensed, a true and correct copy thereof. Any prescription required by section 207 or 208 of this title, and any prescription for, or register of sales of, substances mentioned in such sections shall at all times be open to inspection by duly authorized consular officers in the consular districts of the United States in China. No person, firm, or corporation whose permanent allegiance is due to the United States shall, in a consular district, compound or dispense any drug or drugs or deliver the same to any other person without marking on the container thereof the name of the drug or drugs contained therein and directions for using the same.

(Mar. 3, 1915, ch. 74, §9, 38 Stat. 821.)
(No. 73-CC-71

#### Missouri Technical School, Claimant, *vs.*State of Illinois, Division of Vocational Rehabilitation, Respondent.

*Opinion filed May 25, 1973.*

*310Missouri Technical School, Claimant, pro se.

William J. Scott, Attorney General; William E. Webber, Assistant Attorney General, for Respondent.

Per Curiam.
EXHIBIT
32.1





Certification
Pursuant to


18 U.S.C.
Section 1350,


as
adopted Pursuant to


Section
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.





In
connection with the quarterly report of Receivable Acquisition & Management
Corporation (the “COMPANY”) on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2010 as
filed with the SEC on the date hereof (the “REPORT”), I hereby certify, in my
capacity as an officer of the Company, for purposes of 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as
adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my
knowledge:





(1)
            The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
and





(2)
            The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Company.





/s/    Max
  KhanBy:  Max
      KhanChief
      Executive Officer,Chief Financial OfficerDATE:  May
      13, 2010
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,  AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of ALCO, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-QSB/A for the  period ended March 31, 2006 (the "Report"), I, Yip Kam Ming, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

> 1) The Report fully complies with the requirement of Section 13(a) or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange
> Act of 1934; and
> 
> 
> 2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the Company's
> financial position and results of operations.

/s/ Yip Kam Ming



Yip Kam Ming,

 Chief Financial Officer

November 10, 2006
WARNING: THE EDGAR SYSTEM ENCOUNTERED ERROR(S) WHILE PROCESSING THIS SCHEDULE.

<TABLE> <S> <C>

                                                                    Exhibit 27

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
<CURRENCY> U.S. DOLLARS
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1997
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                1.00000
<CASH>                                          42,532
<SECURITIES>                                    31,497
<RECEIVABLES>                                   53,713
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                     25,639
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               164,648
<PP&E>                                         234,762
<DEPRECIATION>                                (74,710)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 530,097
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          114,235
<BONDS>                                        153,359
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         2,515
<OTHER-SE>                                     165,412
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   530,097
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                69,710
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   61,499
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               (7,356)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               1,614
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 13,953
<INCOME-TAX>                                     6,644
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     7,309
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    0.290
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    0.290
        

</TABLE>
### §§9251 to 9253. Repealed. Pub. L. 113–128, title V, §511(a), July 22, 2014, 128 Stat. 1705

Section 9251, Pub. L. 105–220, title II, §241, Aug. 7, 1998, 112 Stat. 1072, related to administrative provisions.

Section 9252, Pub. L. 105–220, title II, §242, Aug. 7, 1998, 112 Stat. 1073; Pub. L. 110–154, §1(c)(2), Dec. 21, 2007, 121 Stat. 1827; Pub. L. 112–166, §2(dd), Aug. 10, 2012, 126 Stat. 1290, established the National Institute for Literacy.

Section 9253, Pub. L. 105–220, title II, §243, Aug. 7, 1998, 112 Stat. 1078; Pub. L. 105–277, div. A, §101(f) [title VIII, §404(e)], Oct. 21, 1998, 112 Stat. 2681–337, 2681–417; Pub. L. 110–154, §1(c)(2), Dec. 21, 2007, 121 Stat. 1827, related to national leadership activities.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date of Repeal

Repeal effective on the first day of the first full program year after July 22, 2014 (July 1, 2015), see section 506 of Pub. L. 113–128, set out as an Effective Date note under section 3101 of Title 29, Labor.