alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
##### Table of Contents



UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
 Washington, D.C. 20549
 
 FORM 8-K
 CURRENT REPORT
Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
 
 Date of Report (Date of earliest event reported): June 30, 2011
 ORION ENERGY SYSTEMS, INC.
  Wisconsin
    
    01-33887
    
    39-1847269(State or other
    
    (Commission File
    
    (IRS Employerjurisdiction of
    
    Number)
    
    Identification No.)incorporation)
 (Address of principal executive offices, including zip code)
 (Registrants telephone number, including area code)
 (Former name or former address, if changed since last report)
 
  o
    
    Written communications pursuant to Rule 425 under the Securities Act (17 CFR 230.425)o
    
    Soliciting material pursuant to Rule 14a-12 under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.14a-12)o
    
    Pre-commencement communications pursuant to Rule 14d-2(b) under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.14d-2(b))o
    
    Pre-commencement communications pursuant to Rule 13e-4(c) under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.13e-4(c))




---



TABLE OF CONTENTS  Item 3.01(a) Notice of Delisting or Failure to Satisfy a Continued Listing Rule or Standard; Transfer of ListingItem 8.01 Other EventsItem 9.01(d).Financial Statements and ExhibitsSIGNATURESEX-99.1    Table of Contents  
 Item 3.01(a) Notice of Delisting or Failure to Satisfy a Continued Listing Rule or Standard; Transfer of Listing.
    
 Item 8.01 Other Events
  
 Item 9.01(d). Financial Statements and Exhibits.
  2




---



##### Table of Contents



SIGNATURES
  ORION ENERGY SYSTEMS, INC.Date:  July 6, 2011
    By:
    /s/ Scott R. JensenScott R. JensenChief Financial Officer 3
#### Mary AMERSON; Michael Alex Hayes, Appellants, v. State of IOWA; Polk County, IA; City of Des Moines, IA; City of Windsor Heights, Iowa; Des Moines Independent Community School District; Heartland Area Education Agency; Youth Homes of Mid America; M. Katherine Miller; Fifth Judicial District of Iowa; Broadlawns Medical Center; Child Psychiatry Associates; Kent Kunze; Iowa Department of Education; Department of Human Services; Iowa Department of Inspections Appeals; Legal Services Corporation of Iowa; Jean Davis, Appellees.

No. 05-2244.

United States Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit.

Submitted: May 2, 2006.

Filed: Aug. 2, 2006.

Mary Amerson, Des Moines, IA, pro se.

Michael Alex Hayes, Des Moines, IA, pro se.

Charles Keith Phillips, Attorney General’s Office, Helen Christine Adams, Rebecca Boyd Dublinske, Dickinson & Mackaman, Susan A. Low, City Attorney’s Office Legal Department, Andrew J. Bracken, Nathan J. Overberg, Ahlers *&*Cooney, Sue Luettjohann Seitz, Belin & Lamson, William F. Fanter, Andrew C. Johnson, Bradshaw *&*Fowler, David Lee Brown, Hansen *&*McClintock, Dennis Wayne Johnson, Amy Marie Bjork, Dorsey & Whitney, James Frederick Elliott, Des Moines, IA, for Appellees.

Before RILEY, MAGILL, and GRUENDER, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

Mary Amerson and Michael Alex Hayes appeal the district court’s1 order dismissing, as failing to state a claim or as resjudicata barred, their civil rights action concerning defendants’ handling of matters related to school, custody, and parental rights. Following careful review, we affirm the judgment of the district court for the reasons discussed in the court’s order. *See*8th Cir. R. 47B.

1

. The Honorable James E. Gritzner, United States District Judge for the Southern District of Iowa.
```

[Congressional Bills 114th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 3931 Referred in Senate (RFS)]

<DOC>
114th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 3931

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                              May 24, 2016

Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Homeland Security 
                        and Governmental Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
at 620 Central Avenue Suite 1A in Hot Springs National Park, Arkansas, 
  as the ``Chief Petty Officer Adam Brown United States Post Office''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. CHIEF PETTY OFFICER ADAM BROWN UNITED STATES POST OFFICE.

    (a) Designation.--The facility of the United States Postal Service 
located at 620 Central Avenue Suite 1A in Hot Springs National Park, 
Arkansas, shall be known and designated as the ``Chief Petty Officer 
Adam Brown United States Post Office''.
    (b) References.--Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, 
paper, or other record of the United States to the facility referred to 
in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``Chief 
Petty Officer Adam Brown United States Post Office''.

            Passed the House of Representatives May 23, 2016.

            Attest:

                                                 KAREN L. HAAS,

                                                                 Clerk.
```
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY ELEV

 219.84

 221.74

 220.24

 218.15

 219.01

 220.94

 220.86

 219.85

 220.16

 221.00

 219.26

 220.64

 221.63

 221.70

 221.39

 222.02

 222.56

 219.95

 220.79

 221.07

 221.01

 221.36

 221.59

 221.92

 220.17

 220.07

 221.39

 221.70

 221.06

 220.75

 219.87

 42,738

 47,703

 43,775

 38,445

 40,610

 45,603

 45,394

 42,764

 43,567

 45,760

 41,247

 44,818

 47,414

 47,598

 46,784

 48,438

 49,873

 43,023

 45,210

 45,944

 45,787

 46,705

 47,309

 48,176

 43,593

 43,334

 46,784

 47,598

 45,918

 45,106

 42,815

STORAGE

-7,721

+4,965

-3,928

-5,330

+2,165

+4,993

-209

-2,630

+803

+2,193

-4,513

+3,571

+2,596

+184

-814

+1,654

+1,435

-6,850

+2,187

+734

-157

+918

+604

+867

-4,583

-259

+3,450

+814

-1,680

-812

-2,291

CHANGE

2,391

2,554

2,720

2,712

2,611

1,740

1,705

1,010

617

745

757

687

694

735

769

799

807

799

966

912

990

1,013

985

972

984

931

728

518

407

379

658

PUMPING

 211

 211

 219

 219

 0

 0

 416

 0

 416

 0

 0

 313

 313

 416

 274

 0

 0

 833

 0

 0

 440

 0

 840

 0

 0

 972

 266

 0

 767

 109

 0

PUMPING

 8,817

 2,924

 7,329

 8,316

 3,953

 2,538

 4,935

 6,325

 4,565

 4,556

 7,800

 3,055

 3,805

 5,036

 5,565

 3,979

 4,047

 6,459

 3,013

 3,930

 4,432

 5,096

 3,804

 4,358

 7,105

 3,779

 2,270

 4,113

 4,104

 4,088

 5,802

PUMPING

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

GEN.

*

-173

-23

-12

-27

-38

+73

+49

-31

-129

-133

-58

-46

+29

+25

-72

+194

-40

+95

+30

+111

-255

+29

+86

+229

+129

+5

-66

+126

+109

+34

+206

OR

UNITED STATES 

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION

CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT

CONSOLIDATED STATE-FEDERAL O'NEILL FOREBAY March 10, 2015

DAILY OPERATIONS

JANUARY 2015 RUN DATE:

IN LAKE GEN.

ACRE-FEET O'NEILL

RELEASE - C.F.S. 

TOTALS -7,644 35,295 0 149,898 7,235 +456

ACRE-FEET -7,644 70,008 0 297,323 14,351

SUMMARY

 133

RELEASE (ACRE-FEET)

O'NEILL GEN. 0

SAN LUIS PUMP 297,323 133

 50,459

DOS AMIGOS PUMP 14,351

DELIVERIES 

S. LUIS O'NEILL

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

CALIF. DOS AMIGOS

AQUEDUCT

2,918

3,108

2,859

3,163

2,472

3,242

3,492

4,020

4,898

5,049

4,826

4,527

4,703

4,785

4,732

3,820

4,003

2,946

3,120

3,278

4,058

4,517

3,878

3,595

3,682

3,685

3,613

3,880

3,507

3,375

3,850

 117,601

 233,262

S. LUIS

DELIV.

GAINS(+)

LOSS(-)

C.F.S.

INFLOW - C.F.S.

STATE OF CALIFORNIA

THE RESOURCES AGENCY

DEPARTMENT OF WATER RESOURCES

STATE WATER PROJECT

TOTAL 311,807

 904

* DAILY DEL. FIGURES UNAVAILABLE. TOT. DEL. IS INCLUDED IN COMPUTING MONTHLY TOTALS
Exhibit 23.1
 CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
  Vancouver, Canada,
    
    /s/ Ernst & Young LLPJuly 21, 2011
    
    Chartered Accountants
Exhibit 12.1
 CERTIFICATION
      (a)
    
    Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure
controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material
information relating to the company, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made
known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which
this report is being prepared;
 (b)
    
    Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such
internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to
provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the
preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally
accepted accounting principles;
 (c)
    
    Evaluated the effectiveness of the companys disclosure controls and procedures
and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure
controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on
such evaluation; and
 (d)
    
    Disclosed in this report any change in the companys internal control over
financial reporting that occurred during the period covered by the annual report that
has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the companys
internal control over financial reporting; and
  (a)
    
    All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation
of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely
affect the companys ability to record, process, summarize and report financial
information; and
 (b)
    
    Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees
who have a significant role in the companys internal control over financial reporting.
  By:
    
    /s/ Hary Tanoesoedibjo

Hary TanoesoedibjoChief Executive Officer
UN PUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 23
- 6769

BRANDON S. SAUL , Petitioner

- Appellant ,

v. DONNIE AMES, Superintendent, M t . Olive Complex , Respondent

- Appellee

.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of West Virginia , at Martinsburg

. Gina M. Groh , District Judge. ( 3:22

- cv - 00169

- GMG

- RWT )

Submitted : April 17, 2024 Decided: April 30, 2024

Before WILKINSON and AGEE , Circuit Judges , and MOTZ, Senior Circuit Judge

.
Dismissed by un published per curiam opinion

. Brandon S. Saul, Appellant Pro Se. Lindsay Sara See, Michael Ray Williams, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF WEST VIRGINIA , Charleston, West Virginia, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. USCA4 Appeal: 23-6769 Doc: 13 Filed: 04/30/2024 Pg: 1 of 22 PER CURIAM: Brandon S. Saul seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying his Fed. R. Civ. P. 60(b) motion for relief from the district court’s prior order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 petition. The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1)(A). See generally United States v.
McRae , 793 F.3d 392, 400 & n.7 (4th Cir. 2015) . A certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitu tional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2). When the district court denies relief on the merits, a prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists c ould find the district court’s assessment of the constitutional claims debatable or wrong. See Buck v. Davis , 580 U.S. 100, 115

- 17 (2017). When the district court denies relief on procedural grounds, the prisoner must demonstrate both that the dispositive procedural ruling is debatable and that the petition states a debatable claim of the denial of a constitutional right. Gonzalez v. Thaler , 565 U.S. 134, 140

- 41 (2012) (citing Slack v. McDaniel , 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000))

. We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Saul has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argume nt would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED USCA4 Appeal: 23-6769 Doc: 13 Filed: 04/30/2024 Pg: 2 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

DAY ELEV

 220.18

 220.98

 221.55

 221.14

 221.34

 219.40

 220.50

 220.70

 219.78

 219.04

 218.81

 218.70

 217.38

 221.03

 220.89

 220.06

 220.68

 221.48

 222.60

 219.92

 220.66

 220.60

 220.10

 220.30

 219.40

 220.50

 220.79

 222.22

 222.64

 220.95

 43,619

 45,708

 47,204

 46,128

 46,653

 41,605

 44,453

 44,975

 42,583

 40,686

 40,103

 39,825

 36,551

 45,839

 45,472

 43,308

 44,923

 47,020

 49,980

 42,945

 44,870

 44,714

 43,411

 43,931

 41,605

 44,453

 45,210

 48,969

 50,086

 45,629

STORAGE

+4,749

+2,089

+1,496

-1,076

+525

-5,048

+2,848

+522

-2,392

-1,897

-583

-278

-3,274

+9,288

-367

-2,164

+1,615

+2,097

+2,960

-7,035

+1,925

-156

-1,303

+520

-2,326

+2,848

+757

+3,759

+1,117

-4,457

CHANGE

2,664

2,094

1,637

1,422

1,522

1,499

1,557

1,534

1,464

1,383

1,711

1,945

2,063

2,041

862

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

PUMPING

 8,458

 7,352

 5,196

 5,230

 4,506

 4,574

 3,491

 3,782

 4,655

 4,686

 4,556

 4,462

 4,261

 4,230

 4,562

 4,179

 4,704

 4,587

 3,702

 4,094

 3,392

 4,274

 3,805

 4,060

 5,045

 4,715

 6,746

 4,032

 4,573

 4,561

PUMPING

 1,394

 661

 1,111

 1,445

 1,734

 3,309

 1,426

 2,307

 2,224

 2,603

 2,846

 1,571

 3,140

 0

 175

 0

 0

 0

 0

 298

 491

 34

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 1,176

PUMPING

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 463

 640

 541

 476

 387

 232

 203

 307

 405

 447

 530

 642

 599

 651

 724

 757

GEN.

*

+264

+219

+125

-104

+10

-33

+365

+154

+484

+173

-249

+285

-158

+343

-79

-99

-254

-130

-21

-78

+173

-247

-163

-91

+49

-161

+86

-120

-229

+567

OR

UNITED STATES 

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION

CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT

CONSOLIDATED STATE-FEDERAL O'NEILL FOREBAY June 11, 2003

DAILY OPERATIONS

APRIL 2003 RUN DATE:

IN LAKE GEN.

ACRE-FEET O'NEILL

RELEASE - C.F.S. 

TOTALS +6,759 25,398 8,004 27,945 140,470 +1,081

ACRE-FEET +6,759 50,377 15,876 55,429 278,622

SUMMARY

 1,010

RELEASE (ACRE-FEET)

O'NEILL GEN. 15,876

SAN LUIS PUMP 55,429 1,010

 38,870

DOS AMIGOS PUMP 278,622

DELIVERIES 

S. LUIS O'NEILL

 4,936

 1,916

 436

 0

 0

 0

 250

 149

 163

 246

 1,928

 0

 0

 3,280

 3,644

 3,828

 5,274

 5,670

 5,314

 944

 4,465

 4,292

 3,558

 4,835

 4,336

 6,954

 7,382

 6,699

 5,670

 3,746

 89,915

 178,346

CALIF. DOS AMIGOS

AQUEDUCT

4,382

4,837

4,864

4,816

4,973

3,873

4,180

4,515

3,562

4,530

3,718

3,663

3,846

3,249

588

0

1,040

580

288

211

418

491

158

26

18

0

258

0

420

444

 63,948

 126,841

S. LUIS

DELIV.

GAINS(+)

LOSS(-)

C.F.S.

INFLOW - C.F.S

STATE OF CALIFORNIA

THE RESOURCES AGENCY

DEPARTMENT OF WATER RESOURCES

STATE WATER PROJECT

TOTAL 350,937

 2,144

* DAILY DEL. FIGURES UNAVAILABLE. TOT. DEL. IS INCLUDED IN COMPUTING MONTHLY TOTALS
### §214. Previous laws unaffected

Nothing in this chapter shall be construed as modifying or revoking any of the provisions of sections 191 to 193 1 of this title.

(Mar. 3, 1915, ch. 74, §13, 38 Stat. 822.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

Sections 191 to 193 of this title, referred to in text, were repealed by Pub. L. 91–513, title III, §1101(a)(1), Oct. 27, 1970, 84 Stat. 1291. See section 801 et seq. of this title.

1 See References in Text note below.
### §1103. Repealed. Pub. L. 100–690, title I, §1007(c)(1), Nov. 18, 1988, 102 Stat. 4187

Section, Pub. L. 92–255, title I, §103, Mar. 21, 1972, 86 Stat. 67; Pub. L. 94–237, §§3, 4(a), Mar. 19, 1976, 90 Stat. 241, defined "drug abuse prevention function", "drug traffic prevention function", and "drug abuse function".

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date of Repeal

Repeal effective Jan. 21, 1989, see section 1012 of Pub. L. 100–690.
Exhibit 32.1  CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002  In connection with the Quarterly Report of ALCO, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ended September 30, 2007 (the "Report"), I, Andrew Liu, Chief Executive Officer and Chairman of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that: 1) The Report fully complies with the requirement of Section 13(a) or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and 2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the Company's financial position and results of operations.  /s/Andrew LiuAndrew Liu, Chief Executive Officer and Chairman November 14, 2007
HILLS BANCORPORATION
                                   EXHIBIT II
                    COMPUTATION OF EARNINGS PER COMMON SHARE
<TABLE>

                                          Three months ended         Nine months ended
                                             September 30              September 30
                                        ----------------------    ----------------------
                                          2001         2000          2001         2000
                                        ----------------------    ----------------------
<S>                                     <C>          <C>          <C>          <C>
Weighted average number of shares
   outstanding (basic)                  1,498,053    1,495,941    1,496,438    1,495,941
Weighted average of potential dilutive
  shares attributable to stock options
  granted computed under the treasury
  stock method                             12,674       12,726       12,248       12,775
                                        ------------------------------------------------
Weighted average number of shares
  (diluted)                             1,510,727    1,508,667    1,508,686    1,508,716
                                        ================================================

Earnings Per Share:
   Net income (in thousands)            $   2,680   $    2,336    $   7,521   $    6,939
                                        ================================================

Earnings per common share:
  Basic                                 $    1.79   $    1.56     $   5.02    $    4.63
  Diluted                               $    1.77   $    1.55     $   4.98    $    4.60
</TABLE>
#### Wallace S. Jacobs, Respondent, v. Abraham M. Perlman et al., Appellants, et al., Defendants.

Action to recover commissions alleged to have been earned by plaintiff pursuant to an agreement with appellant Abraham M. Perlman. Order granting examination of appellants before trial, together with discovery and inspection, affirmed, with $10 costs and disbursements, the examination to proceed on five days’ notice. No opinion. Lewis, P„ J., Carswell, Johnston, Adel and Sneed, JJ., concur.
### SUBCHAPTER V—CLAIMS AGAINST CUBA AND CHINA
#### § 220.38 When a widow(er)'s disability determination is governed by the regulations of the Social Security Administration.

In order to receive an annuity based upon disability, a widow(er) must be found disabled under the Railroad Retirement Act. However, in addition to this determination, the widow(er) must be found disabled under the Social Security Act in order to qualify for early Medicare based upon disability.
§ 30.506 To whom and in what manner will OWCP pay compensation? ( a ) Except with respect to claims under Part B of the Act for beryllium sensitivity, payment shall be made to the covered Part B employee or the covered Part E employee, to the duly appointed guardian or conservator of that individual, or to the person with power of attorney for that individual, unless the covered Part B employee or covered Part E employee is deceased at the time of the payment. In all cases involving a deceased covered Part B employee or deceased covered Part E employee, payment shall be made to the eligible surviving beneficiary or beneficiaries, to the duly appointed guardian or conservator of the eligible surviving beneficiary or beneficiaries, or to every person with power of attorney for an eligible surviving beneficiary, in accordance with the terms and conditions specified in sections 7384s(e), 7384u(e), and 7385s-3(c) and (d) of EEOICPA.
( b ) Under Part B of the Act, compensation for any consequential injury, illness, impairment or disease is limited to payment of medical benefits for that injury, illness, impairment or disease. Under Part E of the Act, compensation for any consequential injury, illness, impairment or disease consists of medical benefits for that injury, illness, impairment or disease, as well as any additional monetary benefits that are consistent with the terms of § 30.505(d).
( c ) Rejected compensation payments, or shares of compensation payments, shall not be distributed to other eligible surviving beneficiaries, but shall be returned to the Fund.
( d ) No covered Part B employee may receive more than one lump-sum payment under Part B of EEOICPA for any occupational illnesses he or she contracted. However, any individual, including a covered Part B employee who has received a lump-sum payment for his or her own occupational illness or illnesses, may receive one lump-sum payment for each deceased covered Part B employee for whom he or she qualifies as an eligible surviving beneficiary under Part B of the Act.