alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 404.1537 What we mean by appropriate treatment. By appropriate treatment, we mean treatment for drug addiction or alcoholism that serves the needs of the individual in the least restrictive setting possible consistent with your treatment plan. These settings range from outpatient counseling services through a variety of residential treatment settings including acute detoxification, short-term intensive residential treatment, long-term therapeutic residential treatment, and long-term recovery houses. Appropriate treatment is determined with the involvement of a State licensed or certified addiction professional on the basis of a detailed assessment of the individual's presenting symptomatology, psychosocial profile, and other relevant factors. This assessment may lead to a determination that more than one treatment modality is appropriate for the individual. The treatment will be provided or overseen by an approved institution or facility. This treatment may include (but is not limited to)— ( a ) Medical examination and medical management;
( b ) Detoxification;
( c ) Medication management to include substitution therapy (e.g., methadone);
( d ) Psychiatric, psychological, psychosocial, vocational, or other substance abuse counseling in a residential or outpatient treatment setting; or
( e ) Relapse prevention.
[60 FR 8148, Feb. 10, 1995]
§ 404.971 Dismissal by Appeals Council. The Appeals Council will dismiss your request for review if you did not file your request within the stated period of time and the time for filing has not been extended. The Appeals Council may also dismiss any proceedings before it if— ( a ) You and any other party to the proceedings files a written request for dismissal; or
( b ) You or any other party to the proceedings dies and the record clearly shows that dismissal will not adversely affect any other person who wishes to continue the action.
Exhibit 32.1

           Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 as Adopted
            Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

Solely for the purpose of Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, and
solely to the extent this certification is applicable to Amendment No. 1 to the
Quarterly Report of Warrantech Corporation (the "Company") on Form 10-Q (the
"Report"), the undersigned hereby certify that this Report fully complies with
the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934 and that the information contained in this Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.


Date: August 23, 2004                    /s/ JOEL SAN ANTONIO
                                         ---------------------------------------
                                         Joel San Antonio
                                         Chairman, Chief Executive Officer and
                                         Director

Date: August 23, 2004                    /s/ RICHARD GAVINO
                                         ---------------------------------------
                                         Richard Gavino
                                         Executive Vice President,
                                         Chief Financial Officer,
                                         Chief Accounting Officer, and Treasurer

                                       21
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY HIGH

 17,948

 20,780

 20,495

 20,179

 17,480

 20,047

 18,055

 20,170

 17,745

 19,803

 18,789

 17,503

 16,886

 15,439

 13,896

 13,134

 13,148

 15,014

 14,001

 15,614

 14,940

 13,101

 10,787

 10,935

 9,941

 10,380

 9,682

 9,130

 8,228

 8,517

 9,569

 8,272

 8,285

 12,631

 11,827

 10,639

 11,554

 11,352

 11,449

 10,444

 10,193

 9,875

 8,334

 9,737

 10,030

 5,836

 6,969

 8,069

 8,123

 8,581

 8,142

 8,468

 7,488

 5,030

 4,790

 5,805

 6,178

 6,471

 4,730

 5,061

 5,667

 5,747

 12,975

 15,030

 16,723

 16,127

 14,146

 14,519

 14,702

 14,939

 13,948

 14,509

 14,537

 13,311

 13,462

 12,555

 10,179

 10,193

 10,761

 11,459

 11,604

 11,621

 11,429

 10,376

 8,460

 8,668

 7,879

 8,180

 7,714

 6,396

 6,800

 7,024

 7,323

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

OCTOBER 2009 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: November 3, 2009

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

PORT CHICAGO TOP IN SUISUN BAY
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY HIGH

 122

 124

 123

 124

 125

 125

 125

 124

 123

 123

 123

 126

 126

 124

 125

 126

 127

 128

 128

 128

 129

 129

 130

 130

 131

 133

 134

 134

 134

 136

 136

 118

 118

 118

 118

 119

 120

 119

 119

 118

 118

 118

 120

 122

 122

 122

 122

 122

 124

 124

 124

 125

 125

 126

 127

 127

 128

 131

 132

 132

 132

 134

 120

 120

 120

 120

 121

 121

 121

 120

 119

 119

 120

 122

 123

 123

 123

 124

 124

 125

 125

 126

 126

 126

 127

 128

 128

 130

 132

 133

 133

 135

 135

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

AUGUST 2017 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: September 28, 2017

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

RIO VISTA ON THE SACRAMENTO RIVER
§ 404.328 When your completion of the program, or your continuation in the program for a specified period of time, will increase the likelihood that you will not have to return to the disability benefit rolls. ( a ) We will determine that your completion of the program, or your continuation in the program for a specified period of time, will increase the likelihood that you will not have to return to the disability benefit rolls if your completion of or your continuation in the program will provide you with— ( 1 ) Work experience (see § 404.1565) so that you would more likely be able to do past relevant work (see § 404.1560(b)), despite a possible future reduction in your residual functional capacity (see § 404.1545); or
( 2 ) Education (see § 404.1564) and/or skilled or semi-skilled work experience (see § 404.1568) so that you would more likely be able to adjust to other work that exists in the national economy (see § 404.1560(c)), despite a possible future reduction in your residual functional capacity (see § 404.1545).
( b ) If you are a student age 18 through age 21 participating in an individualized education program described in § 404.327(a)(4), we will find that your completion of or continuation in the program will increase the likelihood that you will not have to return to the disability benefit rolls.
( c ) If you are receiving transition services after having completed an individualized education program as described in paragraph (b) of this section, we will determine that the transition services will increase the likelihood that you will not have to return to the disability benefit rolls if they meet the requirements in § 404.328(a).
Editorial Note on Part 416
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 416 appear at 68 FR 53509, Sept. 11, 2003.

§ 416.1452 Consolidated hearings before an administrative law judge. ( a ) *General.* ( 1 ) A consolidated hearing may be held if— ( i ) You have requested a hearing to decide your eligibility for supplemental security income benefits and you have also requested a hearing to decide your rights under another law we administer; and
( ii ) One or more of the issues to be considered at the hearing you requested are the same issues that are involved in another claim you have pending before us.
( 2 ) If the administrative law judge decides to hold the hearing on both claims, he or she decides both claims, even if we have not yet made an initial or reconsidered determination on the other claim.
( b ) *Record, evidence, and decision.* There will be a single record at a consolidated hearing. This means that the evidence introduced in one case becomes evidence in the other(s). The administrative law judge may make either a separate or consolidated decision.
[45 FR 52096, Aug. 5, 1980, as amended at 51 FR 308, Jan. 3, 1986]
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

DAY HIGH

 27,377

 26,615

 25,636

 25,742

 25,490

 24,921

 24,269

 25,108

 25,731

 21,278

 27,762

 27,692

 27,580

 27,740

 27,680

 26,272

 25,115

 24,021

 23,060

 24,496

 24,875

 23,949

 24,582

 25,647

 25,761

 25,430

 25,094

 25,896

 24,498

 27,121

 13,664

 14,233

 14,284

 14,191

 14,146

 13,819

 13,980

 14,745

 14,794

 14,775

 16,199

 13,221

 12,761

 12,668

 12,530

 12,612

 13,121

 12,505

 12,557

 13,338

 14,017

 13,318

 13,049

 12,582

 11,889

 12,311

 11,750

 11,995

 13,657

 14,162

 20,116

 20,164

 19,631

 19,551

 19,492

 19,157

 19,542

 19,826

 19,852

 18,187

 22,315

 19,530

 19,586

 19,331

 19,160

 18,963

 18,791

 17,984

 18,160

 18,976

 19,331

 18,449

 18,314

 18,591

 18,714

 18,912

 19,108

 19,607

 19,937

 20,603

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

SEPTEMBER 2013 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: February 20, 2014

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

PORT CHICAGO BOTTOM IN SUISUN BAY
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY HIGH

 15,055

 16,923

 16,782

 16,377

 16,127

 16,076

 16,042

 14,137

 14,812

 17,200

 15,677

 16,834

 17,022

 16,397

 16,243

 15,847

 16,510

 16,810

 16,570

 15,525

 12,911

 16,978

 15,264

 19,905

 14,514

 8,618

 3,034

 2,826

 2,880

 3,189

 4,011

 4,476

 6,441

 5,932

 6,737

 7,852

 7,633

 5,979

 4,577

 5,830

 3,069

 3,212

 2,880

 2,956

 3,062

 2,938

 3,034

 4,845

 7,790

 6,216

 5,548

 3,246

 6,314

 7,938

 5,636

 8,511

 2,541

 1,863

 1,243

 1,084

 1,091

 1,179

 12,361

 12,797

 12,052

 12,684

 12,799

 12,846

 11,922

 9,289

 11,308

 10,615

 11,184

 9,485

 10,333

 10,311

 9,728

 10,509

 12,812

 13,329

 12,216

 11,493

 9,596

 12,388

 11,868

 13,338

 11,976

 4,837

 2,580

 2,124

 2,120

 2,258

 2,324

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

OCTOBER 2021 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: January 27, 2022

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

PITTSBURG TOP ON THE SACRAMENTO RIVER
### §98. Transferred

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section, act June 5, 1948, ch. 423, 62 Stat. 344, which related to payment of cost of meat inspection, was transferred to section 695 of this title.
### §9581. Rulemaking

Notwithstanding section 1232(d) of this title, the exemption for public property, loans, grants, and benefits in section 553(a)(2) of title 5 shall apply to the Institute.

(Pub. L. 107–279, title I, §191, Nov. 5, 2002, 116 Stat. 1974.)
**EXHIBIT 31.1****CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER CERTIFICATIONS**I, Joseph J. Atick, President and Chief Executive Officer, certify that:1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Identix Incorporated (the“registrant”); 2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement of amaterial fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in lightof the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to theperiod covered by this quarterly report; 3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included inthis quarterlyreport, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operationsand cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; 4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and15d-15(e) for the registrant and have:     a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls andprocedures to be designed under our supervision to ensure that material information relating tothe registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others withinthose entities, particularly during the period in which this quarterly report is being prepared;     b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures andpresented in this quarterly report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosurecontrols and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on suchevaluation; and     c) disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’sfourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or isreasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting; and5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and theaudit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalentfunctions):     a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation ofinternal controls over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect theregistrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and     b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who havea significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.     Date: December 6, 2005 By: /s/ Joseph J. Atick       Joseph J. Atick
(No. 6624

#### Wright’s Moving Corporation, Claimant, *vs.*State of Illinois, Department of Public Aid, Respondent.

*Opinion filed July 14, 1972.*

Wright’s Moving Corporation, Claimant, pro se.

William J. Scott, Attorney General; Saul R. Wexler, Assistant Attorney General, for Respondent.

Berlin, C.J.
### §2341. Definitions

In this chapter:

#### (1) Appropriate congressional committees

The term "appropriate congressional committees" means—

(A) the Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs of the Senate;

(B) the Committee on Foreign Relations of the Senate;

(C) the Committee on Financial Services of the House of Representatives; and

(D) the Committee on Foreign Affairs of the House of Representatives.

#### (2) Foreign person

The term "foreign person"—

(A) means—

(i) any citizen or national of a foreign country; or

(ii) any entity not organized under the laws of the United States or a jurisdiction within the United States; and

(B) does not include the government of a foreign country.

#### (3) Knowingly

The term "knowingly", with respect to conduct, a circumstance, or a result, means that a person has actual knowledge, or should have known, of the conduct, the circumstance, or the result.

#### (4) Trafficking

The term "trafficking", with respect to fentanyl, fentanyl precursors, or other related opioids, has the meaning given the term "opioid trafficking" in section 2302(8) of this title.

#### (5) Transnational criminal organization

The term "transnational criminal organization" includes—

(A) any organization designated as a significant transnational criminal organization under part 590 of title 31, Code of Federal Regulations;

(B) any of the organizations known as—

(i) the Sinaloa Cartel;

(ii) the Jalisco New Generation Cartel;

(iii) the Gulf Cartel;

(iv) the Los Zetas Cartel;

(v) the Juarez Cartel;

(vi) the Tijuana Cartel;

(vii) the Beltran-Leyva Cartel; or

(viii) La Familia Michoacana; or

(C) any successor organization to an organization described in subparagraph (B) or as otherwise determined by the President.

#### (6) United States person

The term "United States person" means—

(A) a United States citizen or an alien lawfully admitted for permanent residence to the United States;

(B) an entity organized under the laws of the United States or of any jurisdiction within the United States, including a foreign branch of such an entity; or

(C) any person in the United States.

(Pub. L. 118–50, div. E, §3003, Apr. 24, 2024, 138 Stat. 935.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

This chapter, referred to in introductory provisions, was in the original "this division", meaning div. E of Pub. L. 118–50, Apr. 24, 2024, 138 Stat. 934, known as the Fentanyl Eradication and Narcotics Deterrence Off Fentanyl or the FEND Off Fentanyl Act, which is classified principally to this chapter. For complete classification of this Act to the Code, see Short Title note set out below and Tables.

#### Short Title

Pub. L. 118–50, div. E, §3001, Apr. 24, 2024, 138 Stat. 934, provided that: "This division [enacting this chapter and section 2313a of this title and amending sections 1701 and 4315 of Title 50, War and National Defense] may be cited as the 'Fentanyl Eradication and Narcotics Deterrence Off Fentanyl' [sic; probably should be followed by "Act"] or the 'FEND Off Fentanyl Act'."
February 24, 2010 nrpj OF IR " 'S^ORWION 

The Honorable Ray LaHood 

Secretary V i \ ;: | ' 

United States Department of Transportation 

1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE ' 

Washington, D.C; -

20590 

Subject: Haneda Combination Services Allocation Proceeding DOT-OST2010-0018 

Dear Secretary LaHood: 

As a dedicated travel partner of American Airlines, I am vs^riting in support 

of American's application to provide nevy^ service from New York's John F. 

Kennedy International Airport and Los Angeles International Airport to 

Tokyo International Airport at Haneda. 

I recognize and applaud you and the Obama administration for your 

success last December in reaching a landmark Open Skies agreement 

with Japan, which opens up Haneda to service by U.S. airlines. 

I encourage your selection of American Airlines to provide nonstop service 

from New York and Los Angeles to Haneda in order to provide an essential 

connection between three of the world's largest financial and commerce 

centers. 

Recent events, including the successful preservation of Japan Airlines' 

oneworld Alliance membership, have underscored American's strong 

commitment to the trans-Pacific market. American is likewise committed 

to New York and Los Angeles - both vital focal points of business, trade, 

entertainment, technology and education - providing unsurpassed air 

service since the mid-1900s 

Both the New York and Los Angeles metro areas will gain significant 

economic benefits from these proposed new flights, as will American's 

customers qr\0 employees. However, vye need your help to make the JFK 

& LAX/Haneda connection d reality. 

Therefore, I strongly urge you to say yes to American Airlines and its 

request for slots to fly from Kennedy and Los Angeles to Haneda! 
Sincerely, 

f 

CUI 

Tel. :(212)926-6601
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS FINANCIAL DATA SCHEDULE IS INCLUDED IN THIS FORM 10-Q IN COMPLIANCE WITH
THE COMMISSIONS RULES RELATING TO THE EDGAR FILING PROCESS. THIS SCHEDULE
CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE CONSOLIDATED BALANCE
SHEET AS OF DECEMBER 31, 1999 AND THE CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS
DATED AS OF THE SIX MONTH PERIOD ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1999 AND IS QUALIFIED IN
ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND ACCOMPANYING NOTES.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JUL-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1999
<CASH>                                       9,653,000
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                               26,197,000
<ALLOWANCES>                                   985,000
<INVENTORY>                                  5,636,000
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            41,583,000
<PP&E>                                       2,402,000<F1>
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0<F2>
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              76,013,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       15,838,000
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                   109,610,000
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                76,013,000
<SALES>                                     34,993,000
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            14,497,000
<CGS>                                        7,083,000
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               41,763,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0<F2>
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              77,000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                             (6,529,000)<F3>
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                         (6,529,000)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                (6,529,000)
<EPS-BASIC>                                      (0.21)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (0.21)
<FN>
<F1>Property, plant and equipment is shown net of accumulated depreciation.
<F2>Not shown separately when reporting form 10-Q.
<F3>Includes equity interest in joint venture net of tax.
</FN>


</TABLE>
<PAGE>

                                  Exhibit 23.1

               CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT CERTIFIED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS

As independent public accountants, we hereby consent to the incorporation of our
report dated June 9, 1999 and June 12,2000, with respect to the consolidated
financial statements of UniComp, Inc. as of February 28, 1999 and for the two
years ended February 28, 1999 and 1998, included in this Form 10-K, into the
following previously filed Registration Statement of UniComp, Inc.

         -        Form S-8 (file Number 333-39251)

                                                        ARTHUR ANDERSEN LLP

Atlanta, Georgia
June 12, 2000

               CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT CERTIFIED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS

We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Prospectus
constituting a part of this Registration Statement (Form S-8, No. 333-39251)
of our report dated June 7, 2000, relating to the consolidated financial
statements and schedule of UniComp, Inc. appearing in the Company's Annual
Report on Form 10-K for the year ended February 29,2000.

We also consent to the reference to us under the caption "Experts" in the
Prospectus.

                                                  BDO Seidman, LLP
Atlanta, Georgia
June 13, 2000