alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# Fourth Court of Appeals

**San Antonio, Texas**

JUDGMENT

N o. 04

- 14

- 00429

- CV

CITY OF SAN ANTONIO

, Acting through City Public Service Board of San Antonio a/k/a CPS Energy Appellant

v. Casey CASEY INDUSTRIAL, IN C.

, Appellee

From the 408th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2008

- CI

- 06252 Honorable Michael E. Mery, Judge Presiding

BEFORE CHIEF JUSTICE MARION

, JUSTICE ALVAREZ , AND JUSTICE PULLIAM

In accordance with this court’s opinion of this date, t he trial court’s Order on Motion to

Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction is REVERSED and a dismissal of Casey Industrial, Inc.’s claims against appellant for schedule compression, additional steel costs, steel painting, and miscellaneous costs for reworking Wh eelabrator Air Pollution Control, Inc.’s work is

RENDERED. The cause is REMANDED for further proceedings.

It is ORDERED that appellant recover its costs of appeal from appellee.

SIGNED July 1, 2015.

_____________________________ Sandee Bryan Marion, Chief Justice
CITY OF PHILADELPHIA 

DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC HEALTH 

 AIR MANAGEMENT SERVICES 

 RACT PLAN APPROVAL 

Effective Date: February 9, 2016 

Expiration Date: None 

Replaces Permit No. None 

In accordance with provisions of the Air Pollution Control Act, the Act of January 8, 1960, P.L. 2119, 

as amended, and after due consideration of a Reasonably Available Control Technology (RACT) 

proposal received under the Pennsylvania Code, Title 25, Chapter 129.91 thru 129.95, of the rules and 

regulations of the Pennsylvania Department of Environmental Protection (PADEP), Air Management 

Services (AMS) approved the RACT proposal of the Facility below for the source(s) listed in section 

1.A. Emission Sources of the attached RACT Plan Approval. 

Facility: Philadelphia Prison System 

 

Permittee: Philadelphia Prison System 

Location: 8001 State Rd, Philadelphia, PA 19136 

Mailing Address: 8001 State Rd, Philadelphia, PA 19136 

SIC Code(s): 9223 

Plant ID: 9519 

 

Facility Contact: Willie Lewis 

Phone: (215) 685-8490 

 

Permit Contact: Willie Lewis 

Phone: (215) 685-8490 

 

Responsible Official: Daniel Harkins 

Title: Project Coordinator 

 2/9/2016 

Edward Wiener, Chief of Source Registration Date 
RACT PLAN APPROVAL Philadelphia Prison Systems Page 2 

2/9/16 

The RACT plan approval is subject to the following conditions: 

1. The purpose of this Plan Approval is to establish Nitrogen Oxides (NOx) Reasonably Available 

Control Technology (RACT) for Philadelphia Prison System. This includes the following 

emission sources and control equipment: 

 A. Emission Sources 

 One (1) 365 horsepower Natural Gas chiller with a Non- Selective Catalytic Reduction 

 (NSCR) Device or other control device meeting the emission limit in 

 Condition 2. 

 

2. Stack Emission Limits 

 A. NOx emissions from the chiller shall be limited to 2.0 grams per brake horsepower hour. 

 

3. RACT Implementation Schedule 

 A. Upon issuance of this approval, Philadelphia Prison System shall begin immediate 

implementation of the measures necessary to comply with the approved RACT proposal. 

4. Testing and Monitoring Requirements 

 A. A performance test shall be conducted on the chiller within 5 years of the previous performance 

test to assure compliance with the NOx emission limit above. 

5. Recordkeeping and Reporting Requirements 

 A. Philadelphia Prison System shall maintain a file containing all the records and other data that 

are required to be collected to demonstrate compliance with RACT requirements of 25 PA Code 

§129.91-129.94. These records shall include: 

 

 (1) test results 

 B. Records shall be retained for at least five years and shall be made available to AMS on request. 

6. Revision Requirements

 Revisions to any emission limitations incorporated in this RACT Approval will require resubmission 

as revision to the PA State Implementation Plan. The applicant shall bear the cost of public hearing 

and notification required for EPA approval as stipulated in 25 PA Code §129.91(h).
### §387m. Equal treatment of retail outlets

The Secretary shall issue regulations to require that retail establishments for which the predominant business is the sale of tobacco products comply with any advertising restrictions applicable to retail establishments accessible to individuals under the age of 18.

(June 25, 1938, ch. 675, §913, as added Pub. L. 111–31, div. A, title I, §101(b)(3), June 22, 2009, 123 Stat. 1820.)
No. 11,701.

#### Bonham *v.*Tipton.

Decided September 19, 1927.

Action for damages for assault. Judgment for defendant.

*Reversed.*

1. *Assault*— Trial—Proeedwre. In an action for damages for assault, the defendant having testified that lie committed the assault and there being no plea nor evidence of justification or excuse, it was the duty ‘of tlie court to direct a verdict for plaintiff, leaving to the jury the question of damages only.

2. Appeal and *Error*— New *Trial*— Assignment *of Mrrors.*In an action for damages for assault, where defendant admitted the assault without any plea of justification and the verdict was for defendant, objection in the motion for new trial and assignment of errors that the verdict was contrary to the evidence, held sufficiently definite to cover the point on review.

*317
      *Error to the District Court of Saguache County, Hon. J. C. Wiley, Judge.*

Mr. Jesse Stephenson, for plaintiff in error.

Mr. John I. Palmer, for defendant in error.

*Department One.*

Mr. Justice Denison

delivered the opinion of the court.

Bonham sued Tipton for assault; there was a verdict for defendant and Bonham brings error.

The defendant testified that he committed the assault, and there was neither plea nor evidence of justification or excuse; the court should, therefore, have directed a verdict for plaintiff, and left to the jury the question of damages only.

It is objected that neither the motion for new trial nor the assignment of errors covers this point, but one ground in the motion is that the verdict is contrary to' the evidence, which, in this particular case, states the exact situation. See *Leadville v. McDonald,*67 Colo. 131, 135, 186 Pac. 715, and the assignment sets it forth more definitely.

The judgment is reversed and the district court directed to submit only the amount of damages to a jury and render judgment for plaintiff for such sum as they may fix.

Mr. Chiep Justice Burke, Mr. Justice Whitpord and Mr. Justice Sheapor concur.
I 

114TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 4037 

To prohibit the Administrator of the Environmental Protection Agency from 

proposing, finalizing, implementing, or enforcing any prohibition or restriction under the Clean Air Act with respect to the emission of methane 

from the oil and natural gas source category. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

NOVEMBER 17, 2015 

Mr. FLEMING introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Energy and Commerce 

A BILL 

To prohibit the Administrator of the Environmental Protection Agency from proposing, finalizing, implementing, or 

enforcing any prohibition or restriction under the Clean 

Air Act with respect to the emission of methane from 

the oil and natural gas source category. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Keeping Oil and Nat5 ural Gas Flowing for Consumers Act’’. 


emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 4037 IH

1 SEC. 2. PROHIBITION AGAINST EPA REGULATION OF METH2 ANE EMISSIONS FROM OIL AND NATURAL 

3 GAS SOURCE CATEGORY. 

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—The Administrator of the Envi5 ronmental Protection Agency may not propose, finalize, 

6 implement, or enforce any prohibition or restriction under 

7 the Clean Air Act (42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.) with respect 

8 to the emission of methane from the oil and natural gas 

9 source category. 

10 (b) PROPOSED RULE.—The Administrator of the En11 vironmental Protection Agency may not finalize, imple12 ment, or enforce— 

13 (1) the proposed rule entitled ‘‘Oil and Natural 

14 Gas Sector: Emission Standards for New and Modi15 fied Sources’’, published by the Environmental Pro16 tection Agency in the Federal Register on September 

17 18, 2015 (80 Fed. Reg. 56593); or 

18 (2) any substantially similar rule. 

19 (c) DEFINITION.—In this section, the term ‘‘oil and 

20 natural gas source category’’ means— 

21 (1) crude oil production, including the well and 

22 extending to the point of custody transfer to the 

23 crude oil transmission pipeline; and 


emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with BILLS
3 

•HR 4037 IH

1 (2) natural gas production, processing, trans2 mission, and storage, including the well and extend3 ing to, but not including, the city gate. 

Æ 


emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with BILLS
### §9901. Purpose

The purpose of this chapter is to replicate and implement programs at institutions of higher education that provide integrated courses of study in science, technology, engineering, or mathematics, and teacher education, that lead to a baccalaureate degree in science, technology, engineering, or mathematics with concurrent teacher certification.

(Pub. L. 111–358, title V, §551, Jan. 4, 2011, 124 Stat. 4021.)
#### § 404.2123 Other Federal laws and regulations.

Each State VR agency shall comply with the provisions of other Federal laws and regulations that directly affect its responsibilities in carrying out the vocational rehabilitation function.

[83 FR 62459, Dec. 4, 2018]
(No. 73-CC-233

#### Raymond W. Miles, Claimant, *vs.*State of Illinois, Department of Conservation, Respondent.

*Opinion filed July 9, 1973.*

Duhadway, Suddes & Davis, Attorney for Claimant.

William J. Scott, Attorney General; Douglas G. Olson, Assistant Attorney General, for Respondent.

Per Curiam.
#### § 404.1797 Reinstatement after suspension—period of suspension expired.

We shall automatically allow a person to serve again as a representative in dealings with us at the end of any suspension.
### §1642p. Authorization of appropriations

There are authorized to be appropriated such sums as may be necessary to enable the Commission and the Treasury Department to pay their administrative expenses incurred in carrying out their functions under this subchapter.

(Mar. 10, 1950, ch. 54, title IV, §417, as added Pub. L. 85–604, §1, Aug. 8, 1958, 72 Stat. 530.)
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

DAY HIGH

 1,812

 1,856

 17,744

 25,666

 25,708

 25,738

 24,034

 21,704

 26,323

 23,032

 19,899

 19,171

 18,424

 16,991

 19,895

 20,023

 19,319

 22,219

 23,522

 21,311

 23,731

 24,321

 26,030

 23,151

 19,094

 12,570

 19,588

 17,616

 20,466

 17,977

 1,206

 1,252

 1,234

 9,724

 8,616

 8,326

 8,416

 8,992

 11,158

 8,921

 7,468

 8,182

 7,618

 7,548

 8,791

 8,858

 7,771

 9,498

 8,524

 7,779

 8,202

 8,762

 9,512

 9,044

 5,364

 5,424

 7,995

 8,556

 9,148

 9,451

 1,447

 1,512

 7,287

 16,248

 15,714

 15,286

 14,903

 16,044

 18,090

 15,452

 14,074

 14,197

 13,203

 11,637

 13,150

 13,503

 12,699

 13,810

 13,837

 13,905

 14,829

 15,698

 17,078

 15,612

 10,392

 9,327

 12,689

 13,430

 13,333

 13,318

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

JUNE 2013 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: September 18, 2013

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

PORT CHICAGO TOP IN SUISUN BAY
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

DAY HIGH

 182

 181

 178

 170

 167

 157

 153

 149

 175

 171

 160

 157

 151

 137

 147

 158

 161

 158

 155

 154

 149

 147

 154

 150

 157

 157

 155

 155

 155

 154

 144

 131

 126

 142

 133

 130

 124

 128

 127

 137

 136

 122

 121

 114

 107

 112

 109

 107

 126

 125

 128

 125

 122

 115

 134

 122

 122

 116

 130

 112

 161

 159

 155

 152

 149

 144

 139

 138

 148

 150

 146

 140

 137

 132

 132

 135

 141

 139

 140

 140

 139

 138

 138

 137

 141

 142

 141

 141

 140

 136

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

APRIL 2013 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: June 25, 2013

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

RIO VISTA ON THE SACRAMENTO RIVER
# National Crime Victims’ Rights Week, 2011

Though our homes and neighborhoods are safer than they have been in decades, millions of Americans still become victims of crime each year.  For many citizens, a sense of security remains painfully elusive, and we must continue to fight crime wherever it exists.

During National Crime Victims’ Rights Week, we renew our commitment to assisting those who have been victimized by crime and supporting those who help survivors rebuild their lives.  Crisis counselors, law enforcement professionals, legal advocates, safe haven staff, and other service providers help victims meet basic needs and find renewed hope for their future.

My Administration remains focused on advancing the progress made in preventing crime and enforcing the rights of its survivors.  We have shined a light on hidden crimes like cyberbullying, online child sexual exploitation, and sexual assault on college campuses.  Through the President’s Interagency Task Force to Monitor and Combat Trafficking in Persons, we are coordinating efforts to address this heinous offense and support its victims.  The Tribal Law and Order Act I signed into law last year gives Native communities new tools to fight crime and greater resources to assist American Indian and Alaska Native women who have been the victims of sexual assault or domestic abuse.

To avoid the recurrence of another financial crisis, we are also working to prevent and prosecute financial crimes.  My Administration’s Financial Fraud Enforcement Task Force helps combat fraud and restore losses suffered by individuals affected by predatory lending, mortgage fraud, and other deceptive financial practices.

For assistance, resources, or additional information, Americans can visit:  www.CrimeVictims.gov.  As we commemorate National Crime Victims’ Rights Week, we reaffirm our pledge to join in supporting crime victims and creating safer communities.

NOW, THEREFORE, I, BARACK OBAMA, President of the United States of America, by virtue of the authority vested in me by the Constitution and the laws of the United States, do hereby proclaim April 10 through April 16, 2011, as National Crime Victims’ Rights Week.  I call upon all Americans to observe this week by participating in events that raise awareness of victims’ rights and services and by volunteering to serve victims in their time of need.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand this eighth day of April, in the year of our Lord two thousand eleven, and of the Independence of the United States of America the two hundred and thirty-fifth.

[FR Doc. 2011-9142

Billing code 3195-W1-P
### §2004. Information sharing

Except as otherwise prohibited by law and except in cases in which the integrity of a criminal investigation would be affected, pursuant to the obligation of the United States under Article 7 of the United Nations Educational, Scientific, and Cultural Organization International Convention Against Doping in Sport done at Paris October 19, 2005, and ratified by the United States in 2008, the Attorney General, the Secretary of Homeland Security, and the Commissioner of Food and Drugs shall provide to the United States Anti-Doping Agency any relevant information relating to the prevention of the use of performance-enhancing drugs or the prohibition of performance-enhancing methods.

(Pub. L. 117–103, div. Q, title III, §305, Mar. 15, 2022, 136 Stat. 817.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section was enacted as part of the United States Anti-Doping Agency Reauthorization Act of 2022 and also as part of the Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2022, and not as part of title VII of Pub. L. 109–469 which comprises this chapter.
#### Domenico Castelli, Respondent, v. Alexander S. Burns, Appellant, Impleaded with Others.

Order affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements. Mo opinion. Present — Ingraham, P. J., McLaughlin, Laughlin, Clarke and Scott, JJ.
Electrical Conductivity, UMHOS WATER TEMPERATURE, DEG DISSOLVED OXYZEN, PPM

Day High Low Mean High Low Mean High Low Mean

1 159 145 153 0.0 0.0 0.0 10.0 3.0 5.8

2 157 3 66 0.0 0.0 0.0 12.0 2.7 8.5

3 9 6 8 0.0 0.0 0.0 12.2 11.3 11.8

4 15 10 12 0.0 0.0 0.0 12.5 11.0 11.7

5 15 1 9 0.0 0.0 0.0 11.7 10.7 11.3

6 1 1 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 12.5 10.6 11.6

7 143 69 134 0.0 0.0 0.0 12.4 10.2 11.0

8 145 142 143 52.3 49.4 50.9 10.7 10.3 10.4

9 149 144 146 52.9 49.7 51.3 10.7 10.2 10.4

10 152 150 151 53.4 50.4 51.9 10.5 10.1 10.3

11 152 143 146 53.1 51.0 52.0 10.6 10.1 10.3

12 149 145 147 53.5 50.6 52.0 10.7 10.1 10.4

13 148 144 146 53.7 50.5 52.2 10.7 10.1 10.4

14 148 142 144 52.2 50.1 51.3 10.9 10.1 10.5

15 146 138 141 51.2 48.1 49.6 11.3 10.4 10.9

16 144 137 139 50.3 47.6 49.0 11.5 10.7 11.1

17 138 102 134 50.7 47.2 48.9 11.6 11.0 11.3

18 137 133 134 51.2 47.3 49.2 11.6 10.9 11.3

19 141 135 137 52.0 48.5 50.2 11.5 10.8 11.1

20 144 137 141 53.1 49.4 51.2 11.4 10.7 11.0

21 142 138 140 54.2 50.8 52.2 11.2 10.6 10.9

22 142 138 140 0.0 0.0 0.0 11.2 10.6 10.8

23 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0

24 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0

25 137 32 123 0.0 0.0 0.0 11.8 10.7 11.0

26 153 133 145 49.6 48.2 48.7 10.7 10.3 10.5

27 144 118 135 49.2 48.2 48.7 10.7 9.9 10.6

28 171 140 157 48.4 47.7 48.1 10.5 9.5 10.1

COMMENT(S):

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

Historical Archive and Report Database

Ripon on the Stanislaus River Water Quality

Period: February 2023 Run Date: 11/27/2023
Exhibit 10.8FIRST AMENDMENT TO CREDIT AGREEMENT     THIS AMENDMENT TO CREDIT AGREEMENT (this “Amendment”) is entered into as of May 31, 2005,by and between THE SPORTSMAN’S GUIDE, INC., a Minnesota corporation (“Borrower”) and WELLS FARGOBANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION (“Bank”).RECITALS     WHEREAS, Borrower is currently indebted to Bank pursuant to the terms and conditions of thatcertain Credit Agreement between Borrower and Bank dated as of June 29, 2004, as amended from timeto time (“Credit Agreement”).     WHEREAS, Bank and Borrower have agreed to certain changes in the terms and conditions setforth in the Credit Agreement and have agreed to amend the Credit Agreement to reflect saidchanges.     NOW, THEREFORE, for valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which are herebyacknowledged, the parties hereto agree that the Credit Agreement shall be amended as follows: 1. Section 5.8 is hereby deleted in its entirety, and the following substitutedtherefor:“SECTION 5.8 DIVIDENDS, DISTRIBUTIONS. Declare or pay any dividend ordistribution either in cash, stock or any other property on Borrower’sstock now or hereafter outstanding, nor redeem, retire, repurchase orotherwise acquire any shares of any class of Borrower’s stock now orhereafter outstanding without the prior written consent of Bank.Notwithstanding the foregoing, Bank hereby expressly acknowledges andagrees that Borrower shall be permitted to continue to repurchase up to10% of its common stock through May 31, 2006.” 2. Except as specifically provided herein, all terms and conditions of theCredit Agreement remain in full force and effect, without waiver or modification. Allterms defined in the Credit Agreement shall have the same meaning when used in thisAmendment. This Amendment and the Credit Agreement shall be read together, as onedocument.  3. Borrower hereby remakes all representations and warranties contained in theCredit Agreement and reaffirms all covenants set forth therein. Borrower furthercertifies that as of the date of this Amendment there exists no Event of Default asdefined in the Credit Agreement, nor any condition, act or event which with the givingof notice or the passage of time or both would constitute any such Event of Default.IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused this Amendment to be executed as of theday and year first written above.     THE SPORTSMAN’S GUIDE, INC. WELLS FARGO BANK,NATIONAL ASSOCIATIONBy:  By:  Charles Lingen, Chief Financial Officer   Thomas Skalitzky, Relationship Manager
### **CHAPTER 46A—FOREIGN DIRECT INVESTMENT AND INTERNATIONAL FINANCIAL DATA**

Sec.
3141.
Congressional findings.
3142.
Report by Secretary of Commerce.
3143.
Reports by Government Accountability Office.
3144.
Access to information; confidentiality.
3145.
Construction of foreign direct investment and international financial data provisions.
3146.
Definitions.
#### In the Matter of the Application of Alice E. Kiley, Appellant, to Remove to Supreme Court, County of New York, an Action now Pending in City Court of City of New York, County of New York, Entitled *“*Alice E. Kiley, plaintiff, against Marnita Realty Corp., Defendant.” Marnita Realty Corp., Respondent.

Order unanimously reversed, with $20 costs and disbursements to the appellant, and the motion granted. Ho opinion. Settle order on notice. Present — Peck, P. J., Glennon, Dore, Cohn and Callahan, JJ.
§ 261.6 Notice of revised decision. ( a ) When a decision is revised, notice of the revision will be mailed to the parties to the decision at their last known address. The notice will state the basis for the revised decision and the effect of the revision. The notice will also inform the parties of the right to further review.
( b ) If a hearings officer or the three-member Board proposes to revise a decision, and the revision would be based only on evidence included in the record on which the prior decision was based, all parties will be notified in writing of the proposed action. If a revised decision is issued by a hearings officer, any party may request that it be reviewed by the three-member Board, or the three-member Board may review the decision on its own initiative.
UNITED STATES

Appellee



### v.

Keshaw n M . B OCAGE

Aviation Electrician’s Mate Airman Recruit (E

- 1 )

U.S. Navy

Appellant NMCCA N o . 20 2 000206

Panel 3

ORDER

Reconsidering Opinion

In accordance with N avy

- Marine Corps Court of Criminal Appeals Rule of

App ellate Procedure 31(a), it is, by the Court, this 1st day of February 20 2 2

,

ORDERED:

That the Court’s 31 January 2022 decision is hereby WITHDRAWN

.

FOR THE COURT:

RODGER A. DREW, JR.

Clerk of Court

Copy to:

45 ( CAPT Belsky ) ; 46 ( LT Marti no ) ; 02
#### § 375.2 National emergency and effective date.

A period of national emergency shall be deemed to exist and the provisions of this part shall become effective only (a) after an attack upon the United States, or at a time specified by the authority of the President after such attack, and (b) by order of the Chair of the Board or his or her successor as set forth in § 375.5, or when it is no longer possible to communicate with such official at his or her designated station.

[29 FR 15864, Nov. 26, 1964, as amended at 64 FR 66381, Nov. 26, 1999]