NOT FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT CRISTIAN RAFAEL JORGE MONZON, AKA Cristian Jorge Jorgemonzon,

Petitioner,

v. WILLIAM P. BARR, Attorney General,

Respondent. No. 16

- 73014 Agency No. A202

- 033

- 636

MEMORANDUM *

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals Submitted February 4, 2020 * * Before: FERNANDEZ, SILVERMAN, and TALLMAN, Circuit Judges. Cristian Rafael Jorge Monzon , a native and citizen of Guatemala, petitions for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order dismissing his appeal from an immigration judge’s decision denying his application s for asylum and withholding of removal. We have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36

- 3.

** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). 

# FILED

FEB 6 2020 MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK U.S. COURT OF APPEALS2 16

- 73014

review de novo questions of law, Cerezo v. Mukasey , 512 F.3d 1163, 1166 (9th Cir. 2008), except to the extent that deference is owed to the BIA’s interpretation of the governing statutes and regulations, Simeonov v. Ashcroft , 371 F.3d 532, 535 (9 th Cir. 2004). We review for substantial evidence the agency’s factual findings.
Garcia

- Milian v. Holder , 755 F.3d 1026, 103 1 (9th Cir. 2014) . We deny the petition for review

. The agency did not err in finding that Jorge Monzon ’s proposed social group b ased on gang recruitment was not cognizable

. See Reyes v. Lynch , 842 F.3d 1125, 1131 (9th Cir. 2016) (in order to demonstrate membership in a particular group, “[t]he applicant must ‘establish that the group is (1) composed of members who share a common immutable characteristic, (2) defined with particularity, and (3) socially distinct within t he society in question.’” (quoting Matter of M

- E

- V

- G

- , 26 I. & N. Dec. 227, 237 (BIA 2014))); see also Barrios v. Holder , 581 F.3d 849,
854

- 55 (9th Cir. 2009) (men in Guatemala resisting gang violence is not a particular social group ). Jorge Monzon does n ot challenge the agency’s determination that resisting gang violence is not a political opinion. See Martinez

- Serrano v. INS , 94 F.3d 1256, 1259

- 60 (9th Cir. 1996) (issues not specifically raised and argued in a3 16

- 73014

party’s opening brief are waived). Substantial evidence supports the BIA’s determination that Jorge Monzon failed to establish the harm he experienced or fears in Guatemala was or would be on account of his family membership or other protected ground

. S ee Ayala v. Holder , 640 F.3d 1095, 10 97 (9th Cir. 2011) (even if membership in a particular social group is established, an applicant must still show that “ persecution was or will be on account of his membership in such group ” ) ; Zetino v. Holder , 622 F.3d 1007, 1016 (9th Cir. 2010) (an applicant’s “desire to be free from harassment by criminals motivated by theft or random violence by gang members bears no nexus to a protected ground”)

. Thus, Jorge Monzon’s asylum and withholding of removal clai m s fail. In light of this disposition, we do not reach Jorge Monzon ’ s remaining contentions. See Simeonov v. Ashcroft , 371 F.3d 532, 538 (9th Cir. 2004) (courts and agencies are not required to decide issues unnecessary to the results they reach).
PETIT ION FOR REV IEW DENIED.