# Appendix A

Federal Register Notice Soliciting

Comments on Information Collection

Requests

# 32323 Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 110 / Friday, June 6, 2008 / Notices

Energy is authorized to issue securities

and assume obligations or liabilities as

a guarantor, indorser, surety, or

otherwise in respect of any security of

another person; provided that such

issuance or assumption is for some

lawful object within the corporate

purposes of Velocity American Energy,

compatible with the public interest, and

is reasonably necessary or appropriate

for such purposes.

The Commission reserves the right to

require a further showing that neither

public nor private interests will be

adversely affected by continued

approvals of Velocity American

Energy ’ s issuance of securities or

assumptions of liability.

Copies of the full text of the Director ’ s

Order are available from the

Commission ’ s Public Reference Room,

888 First Street, NE., Washington, DC

20426. The Order may also be viewed

on the Commission ’ s Web site at

http://www.ferc.gov , using the eLibrary

link. Enter the docket number excluding

the last three digits in the docket

number filed to access the document.

Comments, protests, and interventions

may be filed electronically via the

internet in lieu of paper. See, 18 CFR

385.2001(a)(1)(iii) and the instructions

on the Commission ’ s Web site under the

‘‘ e-Filing ’’ link. The Commission

strongly encourages electronic filings.

Kimberly D. Bose,

Secretary.

[FR Doc. E8

– 12660 Filed 6

– 5

– 08; 8:45 am]

**BILLING CODE 6717**

**– 01** 

**– P**  

# FEDERAL ENERGY REGULATORY

**COMMISSION**

**[Docket No. RM98**

**– 1** 

**– 000]** 



# Records Governing Off-the-Record

**Communications; Public Notice**

April 18, 2008.



# This constitutes notice, in accordance

with 18 CFR 385.2201(b), of the receipt

of prohibited and exempt off-the-record

communications.

Order No. 607 (64 FR 51222,

September 22, 1999) requires

Commission decisional employees, who

make or receive a prohibited or exempt

off-the-record communication relevant

to the merits of a contested proceeding,

to deliver to the Secretary of the

Commission, a copy of the

communication, if written, or a

summary of the substance of any oral

communication.

Prohibited communications are

included in a public, non-decisional file

associated with, but not a part of, the

decisional record of the proceeding.

Unless the Commission determines that

the prohibited communication and any

responses thereto should become a part

of the decisional record, the prohibited

off-the-record communication will not

be considered by the Commission in

reaching its decision. Parties to a

proceeding may seek the opportunity to

respond to any facts or contentions

made in a prohibited off-the-record

communication, and may request that

the Commission place the prohibited communication and responses thereto

in the decisional record. The

Commission will grant such a request

only when it determines that fairness so

requires. Any person identified below as

having made a prohibited off-the-record

communication shall serve the

document on all parties listed on the

official service list for the applicable

proceeding in accordance with Rule

2010, 18 CFR 385.2010.

Exempt off-the-record

communications are included in the

decisional record of the proceeding,

unless the communication was with a

cooperating agency as described by 40

CFR 1501.6, made under 18 CFR

385.2201(e) (1) (v).

The following is a list of off-therecord communications recently

received by the Secretary of the

Commission. The communications

listed are grouped by docket numbers in

ascending order. These filings are

available for review at the Commission

in the Public Reference Room or may be

viewed on the Commission ’ s Web site at

http://www.ferc.gov using the eLibrary

link. Enter the docket number,

excluding the last three digits, in the

docket number field to access the

document. For assistance, please contact

FERC, Online Support at

FERCOnlineSupport@ferc.gov or toll

free at (866)208

– 3676, or for TTY,

contact (202)502

– 8659.

Exempt:

Docket No. Date received Presenter or requester

1. CP07

– 208

– 000 ................................................................................ 5

– 5

– 08 ............................................................ Hon. Charles A. Wilson.

Kimberly D. Bose,

Secretary.

[FR Doc. E8

– 12656 Filed 6

– 5

– 08; 8:45 am]

**BILLING CODE 6717**

**– 01** 

**– P** 



# ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION

**AGENCY**

**[EPA**

**– HQ** 

**– OW** 

**– 2008** 

**– 0438; FRL** 

**– 8576** 

**– 7]** 



# Agency Information Collection

**Activities; Proposed Collection;**

**Comment Request; Microbial Rules**

**(Renewal); EPA ICR No. 1895.04, OMB**

**Control No. 2040**

**– 0205** 

**AGENCY** 

# : Environmental Protection

Agency.

**ACTION** 

# : Notice.

**SUMMARY** 

# : In compliance with the

Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA) (44

U.S.C. 3501 et seq. ), this document announces that EPA is planning to

submit a request to renew an existing

approved Information Collection

Request (ICR) to the Office of

Management and Budget (OMB). This

ICR is scheduled to expire on September

30, 2008. Before submitting the ICR to

OMB for review and approval, EPA is

soliciting comments on specific aspects

of the proposed information collection

as described below.

**DATES** 

# : Comments must be submitted on

or before August 5, 2008.

**ADDRESSES** 

# : Submit your comments,

identified by Docket ID No. EPA

– HQ

– OW

– 2008

– 0438, by one of the following

methods:

• http://www.regulations.gov (our

preferred method): Follow the on-line

instructions for submitting comments.

• E-mail: OW-Docket@epa.gov

.

• Mail: U.S. Environmental

Protection Agency, EPA Docket Center (EPA/DC), Water Docket, MC: 2822T,

1200 Pennsylvania Ave., NW.,

Washington, DC 20460.

• Hand Delivery: EPA Docket Center,

Public Reading Room, EPA

Headquarters West Building, Room

3334, 1301 Constitution Ave., NW.,

Washington, DC. Such deliveries are

only accepted during the Docket ’ s normal hours of operation, and special

arrangements should be made for

deliveries of boxed information.

Instructions: Direct your comments to

Docket ID No. EPA

– HQ

– OW

– 2008

– 0438. EPA ’ s policy is that all comments

received will be included in the public

docket without change and may be

made available online at http://

www.regulations.gov , including any

personal information provided, unless

the comment includes information

claimed to be Confidential Business

Information (CBI) or other information


# 32324 Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 110 / Friday, June 6, 2008 / Notices

whose disclosure is restricted by statute.

Do not submit information that you

consider to be CBI or otherwise

protected through http://

www.regulations.gov or e-mail. The

http://www.regulations.gov Web site is

an ‘‘ anonymous access ’’ system, which

means EPA will not know your identity

or contact information unless you

provide it in the body of your comment.

If you send an e-mail comment directly

to EPA without going through http://

www.regulations.gov your e-mail

address will be automatically captured

and included as part of the comment

that is placed in the public docket and

made available on the Internet. If you

submit an electronic comment, EPA

recommends that you include your

name and other contact information in

the body of your comment and with any

disk or CD

– ROM you submit. If EPA

cannot read your comment due to

technical difficulties and cannot contact

you for clarification, EPA may not be

able to consider your comment.

Electronic files should avoid the use of

special characters, any form of

encryption, and be free of any defects or

viruses. For additional information

about EPA ’ s public docket visit the EPA

Docket Center homepage at http://

www.epa.gov/epahome/dockets.htm

.

**FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT** 

# : Richard Naylor, Drinking Water

Protection Division, Office of Ground

Water and Drinking Water, (MC:

4606M), Environmental Protection

Agency, 1200 Pennsylvania Ave., NW.,

Washington, DC 20460; telephone

number: 202

– 564

– 3847; fax number:

202

– 564

– 3755; e-mail address:

naylor.richard@epa.gov

.

**SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION** 

# :

How Can I Access the Docket and/or

Submit Comments?

EPA has established a public docket

for this ICR under Docket ID No. EPA

– HQ

– OW

– 2008

– 0438, which is available

for online viewing at http://

www.regulations.gov , or in person

viewing at the Water Docket in the EPA

Docket Center (EPA/DC), EPA West,

Room 3334, 1301 Constitution Ave.,

NW., Washington, DC. The EPA/DC

Public Reading Room is open from 8:30

a.m. to 4:30 p.m., Monday through

Friday, excluding legal holidays. The

telephone number for the Reading Room

is 202

– 566

– 1744, and the telephone

number for the Water Docket is 202

–

566

– 2426.

Use http://www.regulations.gov to

obtain a copy of the draft collection of

information, submit or view public

comments, access the index listing of

the contents of the docket, and to access those documents in the public docket

that are available electronically. Once in

the system, select ‘‘ search, ’’ then key in

the docket ID number identified in this

document.

What Information Is EPA Particularly

Interested In?

Pursuant to section 3506(c)(2)(A) of

the PRA, EPA specifically solicits

comments and information to enable it

to:

(i) Evaluate whether the proposed

collection of information is necessary

for the proper performance of the

functions of the Agency, including

whether the information will have

practical utility;

(ii) evaluate the accuracy of the

Agency ’ s estimate of the burden of the

proposed collection of information,

including the validity of the

methodology and assumptions used;

(iii) enhance the quality, utility, and

clarity of the information to be

collected; and

(iv) minimize the burden of the

collection of information on those who

are to respond, including through the

use of appropriate automated electronic,

mechanical, or other technological

collection techniques or other forms of

information technology, e.g., permitting

electronic submission of responses. In

particular, EPA is requesting comments

from very small businesses (those that

employ less than 25) on examples of

specific additional efforts that EPA

could make to reduce the paperwork

burden for very small businesses

affected by this collection.

What Should I Consider When I

Prepare My Comments for EPA?

You may find the following

suggestions helpful for preparing your

comments:

1. Explain your views as clearly as

possible and provide specific examples.

2. Describe any assumptions that you

used.

3. Provide copies of any technical

information and/or data you used that

support your views.

4. If you estimate potential burden or

costs, explain how you arrived at the

estimate that you provide.

5. Offer alternative ways to improve

the collection activity.

6. Make sure to submit your

comments by the deadline identified

under **DATES**



# .

7. To ensure proper receipt by EPA,

be sure to identify the docket ID number

assigned to this action in the subject

line on the first page of your response.

You may also provide the name, date,

and Federal Register citation. What Information Collection Activity or

ICR Does This Apply to?

Affected entities: New and existing

public water systems (PWS), primacy

agencies, and EPA.

Title: Microbial Rules (Renewal).

ICR numbers: EPA ICR No. 1895.04,

OMB Control No. 2040

– 0205.

ICR status: This ICR is currently

scheduled to expire on September 30,

2008. An Agency may not conduct or

sponsor, and a person is not required to

respond to, a collection of information,

unless it displays a currently valid OMB

control number. The OMB control

numbers for EPA ’ s regulations in title 40

of the CFR, after appearing in the

Federal Register when approved, are

listed in 40 CFR part 9, are displayed

either by publication in the Federal

Register or by other appropriate means,

such as on the related collection

instrument or form, if applicable. The

display of OMB control numbers in

certain EPA regulations is consolidated

in 40 CFR part 9.

Abstract: The Microbial Rules

Renewal ICR examines public water

system, primacy agency and EPA

burden and costs for recordkeeping and

reporting requirements in support of the

microbial drinking water regulations.

These recordkeeping and reporting

requirements are mandatory for

compliance with 40 CFR parts 141 and

142. The following microbial

regulations are included: Surface Water

Treatment Rule (SWTR), Total Coliform

Rule (TCR), Interim Enhanced Surface

Water Treatment Rule (IESWTR), Filter

Backwash Recycling Rule (FBRR), Long

Term 1 Enhanced Surface Water

Treatment Rule (LT1ESWTR), Long

Term 2 Enhanced Surface Water

Treatment Rule (LT2ESWTR), and

Ground Water Rule. Future microbialrelated rulemakings will be added to

this consolidated ICR after the

regulations are finalized and the initial,

rule-specific, ICRs are due to expire.

Burden Statement: The annual public

reporting and recordkeeping burden for

this collection of information is

estimated to average 0.79 hours per

response. Burden means the total time,

effort, or financial resources expended

by persons to generate, maintain, retain,

or disclose or provide information to or

for a Federal agency. This includes the

time needed to review instructions;

develop, acquire, install, and utilize

technology and systems for the purposes

of collecting, validating, and verifying

information, processing and

maintaining information, and disclosing

and providing information; adjust the

existing ways to comply with any

previously applicable instructions and


# 32325 Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 110 / Friday, June 6, 2008 / Notices

requirements which have subsequently

changed; train personnel to be able to

respond to a collection of information;

search data sources; complete and

review the collection of information;

and transmit or otherwise disclose the

information.

The ICR provides a detailed

explanation of the Agency ’ s estimate,

which is only briefly summarized here:

Estimated total number of potential

respondents: 161,274.

Frequency of response: Varies by

requirement (i.e., on occasion, monthly,

quarterly, semi-annually, and annually).

Estimated total average number of

responses for each respondent: 72.

Estimated total annual burden hours:

9,151,424 hours.

Estimated total annual costs:

$118,653,327. This includes an

estimated burden cost of $14,698,327

and an estimated cost of $22,793,000 for

capital investment and $81,162,000 for

maintenance and operational costs.

Are There Changes in the Estimates

From the Last Approval?

There is an increase of 526,559 hours

in the total estimated respondent

burden compared with that identified in

the ICR currently approved by OMB.

This increase is primarily due to

restructuring adjustments (i.e.,

incorporation of the approved burden

hours from the previously stand-alone

ICRs for the Long Term 2 Enhanced

Surface Water Treatment Rule, and

Ground Water Rule

What Is the Next Step in the Process for

This ICR?

EPA will consider the comments

received and amend the ICR as

appropriate. The final ICR package will

then be submitted to OMB for review

and approval pursuant to 5 CFR

1320.12. At that time, EPA will issue

another Federal Register notice

pursuant to 5 CFR 1320.5(a)(1)(iv) to

announce the submission of the ICR to

OMB and the opportunity to submit

additional comments to OMB. If you

have any questions about this ICR or the

approval process, please contact the

technical person listed under **FOR**

**FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT**



# .

Dated: June 2, 2008.

Cynthia C. Dougherty,

Director, Office of Ground Water and Drinking

Water.

[FR Doc. E8

– 12708 Filed 6

– 5

– 08; 8:45 am]

**BILLING CODE 6560**

**– 50** 

**– P**  

# ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION

**AGENCY**

**[EPA**

**– HQ** 

**– OW** 

**– 2008** 

**– 0437; FRL** 

**– 8576** 

**– 8]** 



# Agency Information Collection

**Activities; Proposed Collection;**

**Comment Request; Public Water**

**System Supervision Program**

**(Renewal); EPA ICR No. 0270.43, OMB**

**Control No. 2040**

**– 0090** 

**AGENCY** 

# : Environmental Protection

Agency.

**ACTION** 

# : Notice.

**SUMMARY** 

# : In compliance with the

Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA) (44

U.S.C. 3501 et seq. ), this document

announces that EPA is planning to

submit a request to renew an existing

approved Information Collection

Request (ICR) to the Office of

Management and Budget (OMB). This

ICR is scheduled to expire on September

30, 2008. Before submitting the ICR to

OMB for review and approval, EPA is

soliciting comments on specific aspects

of the proposed information collection

as described below.

**DATES** 

# : Comments must be submitted on

or before August 5, 2008.

**ADDRESSES** 

# : Submit your comments,

identified by Docket ID No. EPA

– HQ

– OW

– 2008

– 0437, by one of the following

methods:

• http://www.regulations.gov (our

preferred method): Follow the on-line

instructions for submitting comments.

• E-mail: OW

–

Docket@epa.gov

.

• Mail: U.S. Environmental

Protection Agency, EPA Docket Center

(EPA/DC), Water Docket, MC: 2822T,

1200 Pennsylvania Ave., NW.,

Washington, DC 20460.

• Hand Delivery: EPA Docket Center,

Public Reading Room, EPA

Headquarters West Building, Room

3334, 1301 Constitution Ave., NW.,

Washington, DC. Such deliveries are

only accepted during the Docket ’ s normal hours of operation, and special

arrangements should be made for

deliveries of boxed information.

Instructions: Direct your comments to

Docket ID No. EPA

– HQ

– OW

– 2008

– 0437. EPA ’ s policy is that all comments

received will be included in the public

docket without change and may be

made available online at http://

www.regulations.gov , including any

personal information provided, unless

the comment includes information

claimed to be Confidential Business

Information (CBI) or other information

whose disclosure is restricted by statute.

Do not submit information that you

consider to be CBI or otherwise

protected through http:// www.regulations.gov or e-mail. The

http://www.regulations.gov Web site is

an ’’ anonymous access ’’ system, which

means EPA will not know your identity

or contact information unless you

provide it in the body of your comment.

If you send an e-mail comment directly

to EPA without going through http://

www.regulations.gov your e-mail

address will be automatically captured

and included as part of the comment

that is placed in the public docket and

made available on the Internet. If you

submit an electronic comment, EPA

recommends that you include your

name and other contact information in

the body of your comment and with any

disk or CD

– ROM you submit. If EPA

cannot read your comment due to

technical difficulties and cannot contact

you for clarification, EPA may not be

able to consider your comment.

Electronic files should avoid the use of

special characters, any form of

encryption, and be free of any defects or

viruses. For additional information

about EPA ’ s public docket visit the EPA

Docket Center homepage at http://

www.epa.gov/epahome/dockets.htm

.

**FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT** 

# : Richard Naylor, Drinking Water

Protection Division, Office of Ground

Water and Drinking Water, (MC:

4606M), Environmental Protection

Agency, 1200 Pennsylvania Ave., NW.,

Washington, DC 20460; telephone

number: 202

– 564

– 3847; fax number:

202

– 564

– 3755; e-mail address:

naylor.richard@epa.gov

.

**SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION** 

# :

How Can I Access the Docket and/or

Submit Comments?

EPA has established a public docket

for this ICR under Docket ID No. EPA

– HQ

– OW

– 2008

– 0437, which is available

for online viewing at http://

www.regulations.gov , or in person

viewing at the Water Docket in the EPA

Docket Center (EPA/DC), EPA West,

Room 3334, 1301 Constitution Ave.,

NW., Washington, DC. The EPA/DC

Public Reading Room is open from 8:30

a.m. to 4:30 p.m., Monday through

Friday, excluding legal holidays. The

telephone number for the Reading Room

is 202

– 566

– 1744, and the telephone

number for the Water Docket is 202

–

566

– 2426.

Use http://www.regulations.gov to

obtain a copy of the draft collection of

information, submit or view public

comments, access the index listing of

the contents of the docket, and to access

those documents in the public docket

that are available electronically. Once in

the system, select ‘‘ search, ’’ then key in


# Appendix B

Surface Water Treatment Rule

SpreadsheetsRequirementAnnualRespondentsAvg. AnnualResponsesAnnualBurdenAnnual Burden(Labor) CostAnnual O&MCostAnnual CapitalCostRaw WaterColiformsSampling60 9,840 19,679 $604,488 $208,670 N/AOn SiteInspections &WatershedManagement60 60 137,605 $4,226,837 N/A N/ARaw WaterTurbidityMonitoring60 175,200 11,315 $347,566 $43,347 $22,189RequirementAnnualRespondentsAvg. AnnualResponsesAnnualBurdenAnnual Burden(Labor) CostAnnual O&MCostAnnual CapitalCostFinished WaterTurbidityMonitoring1,767 5,158,761 608,125 $18,679,948 $1,055,715 $527,293RequirementAnnualRespondentsAvg. AnnualResponsesAnnualBurdenAnnual Burden(Labor) CostAnnual O&MCostAnnual CapitalCostTotals forUnfiltered andFiltered Systems1,827 5,343,860 776,724 $23,858,839 $1,307,732 $549,482RequirementAnnualRespondentsAvg. AnnualResponsesAnnualBurdenAnnual Burden(Labor) CostAnnual O&MCostAnnual CapitalCostFinished WaterTurbidityMonitoring57 22,700 183,216 $7,841,486 N/A N/ANote: State activities associated with disinfectant residual monitoring requirements are addressed in theDBP/Chems/Rads ICR.Note: Disinfectant residual monitoring requirements under the SWTR are addressed in the DBP/Chems/Rads ICR.Note: Disinfectant residual monitoring requirements under the SWTR are addressed in the DBP/Chems/Rads ICR.Note: State activities associated with disinfectant residual monitoring requirements are addressed in theDBP/Chems/Rads ICR.Exhibit B.1a - SWTR Unfiltered System Burden and Cost SummaryExhibit B.1b - SWTR Filtered System Burden and Cost SummaryExhibit B.1d - SWTR State Burden and Cost SummaryExhibit B.1c - Total SWTR PWS (Filtered + Unfiltered System) Burden and Cost SummaryMicrobial ICR - SWTRB - 1July 2008CWS NTNC TNC CWS NTNC TNC CWS NTNC TNC CWS NTNC TNC<1001,179 259 1,238 438 129 636 1 0 0 437 129 636101-500 2,093 236 475 659 148 375 4 0 0 655 148 375501-1,000 1,167 88 82 365 60 62 3 0 0 362 60 621,001-3,300 2,458 68 56 944 33 44 15 0 0 929 33 443,301-10K 2,026 20 22 1,005 5 19 14 0 0 991 5 1910,001-50K 1,828 6 3 962 2 2 14 0 0 948 2 250,001-100K 378 1 0 218 0 0 4 0 0 214 0 0100,001-1M 306 1 1 230 0 1 4 0 0 226 0 1>1M 16 0 1 15 0 0 1 0 0 14 0 0Total 11,452 680 1,878 4,837 377 1,139 60 0 0 4,777 377 1,139Note: Source was not specified for some systems. These PWSs were assigned to SW or GW categories based on the ratio of SW to GWsystems within a given size category.CWS NTNC TNC CWS NTNC TNC CWS NTNC TNC CWS NTNC TNC CWS NTNC TNC<1001.00 1.0 1.0 437 129 636 N/A N/A N/A 207 61 302 230 68 335101-500 1.00 1.0 1.0 655 148 375 N/A N/A N/A 328 74 187 328 74 188501-1,000 1.04 1.0 1.0 377 60 62 N/A N/A N/A 328 52 54 49 8 81,001-3,300 1.04 1.0 1.0 967 33 44 N/A N/A N/A 783 27 36 184 6 83,301-10K 1.05 1.0 1.0 1,041 5 19 N/A N/A N/A 920 4 17 120 1 210,001-50K 1.11 1.0 1.0 1,052 2 2 985 2 2 N/A N/A N/A 68 0 050,001-100K 1.11 1.0 1.0 238 0 0 198 0 0 N/A N/A N/A 40 0 0100,001-1M 1.64 1.0 1.0 371 0 1 334 0 1 N/A N/A N/A 37 0 0>1M 1.64 1.0 1.0 23 0 0 9 0 0 N/A N/A N/A 14 0 0Total 5,160 377 1,139 1,525 2 3 2,565 219 596 1,069 157 541Source: Entry pts for CWSs: From Exhibits 5.1 and 5.2 of the Draft Final Model Systems Report prepared for EPA by the Cadmus Group, Inc., in March 2005. The exhibits are an analysis of data from the 2000 CommunityWater System Survey. Includes treated entry points. Excludes 2 outlier systems that had more than 100 entry points, as well as27 systems that provided insufficient information on their treated entry points. Numbers of plantsmonitoring under IESWTR and LT1ESWTR are from Appendix D and E system inventories and are based on percentage of plants using conventional or direct filtration.Total Plants Monitoring Under IESWTR(SW/GWUDI)Total Filtered Plants Monitoring UnderSWTR (SW/GWUDI)Plants Per System(SW/GWUDI)PopulationCategoryTotal Plants Monitoring Under LT1ESWTR(SW/GWUDI)Total Filtered Non-Purchased Plants(SW/GWUDI)Source: SDWIS/FED Data from October 2007. Number of unfiltered systems from ICR done for final LT2ESWTR in 2006.Exhibit B.2 - SWTR System InventoryPopulationCategoryFiltered Non-Purchased Surface Water/GWUDIUnfiltered Surface Water/GWUDISurface Waterand GWUDI Non-Purchased Surface Water/GWUDIMicrobial ICR - SWTRB - 2July 2008TotalSamples/YearO&M CostsCWS NTNC TNC Collect AnalysisO&M (materials)Labor CWS Sample Collection AnalysisAnalyticalMaterials(hrs) (cost) (hrs) (cost)<100 $30.72 1 0 0 52 1 1 $21.21 $30.72 5252 $1,597 52$1,597 1,103$101-500 $30.72 4 0 0 52 1 1 $21.21 $30.72 208208 $6,389 208$6,389 4,411$501-1,000 $30.72 3 0 0 104 1 1 $21.21 $30.72 312312 $9,584 312$9,584 6,617$1,001-3,300 $30.72 15 0 0 104 1 1 $21.21 $30.72 1,5601560 $47,919 1,560$47,919 33,083$3,301-10K $30.72 14 0 0 156 1 1 $21.21 $30.72 2,1842184 $67,087 2,184$67,087 46,317$10,001-25K $30.72 9 0 0 208 1 1 $21.21 $30.72 1,8261826 $56,084 1,826$56,084 38,721$25,001-50K $30.72 5 0 0 260 1 1 $21.21 $30.72 1,3581358 $41,705 1,358$41,705 28,794$50,001-100K $30.72 4 0 0 260 1 1 $21.21 $30.72 1,0401040 $31,946 1,040$31,946 22,056$100,001-1M $30.72 4 0 0 260 1 1 $21.21 $30.72 1,0401040 $31,946 1,040$31,946 22,056$>1M $30.72 1 0 0 260 1 1 $21.21 $30.72 260260 $7,986 260$7,986 5,514$Total 60 0 0 1,7169,8409,840302,244$ 9840 302,244$ 208,670$Unfiltered systems must measure total or fecal coliform density of source water 1-5 times per week, depending on system size (40 CFR 141.74(b)).Cost/SampleExhibit B.3 - Raw Water Coliforms Burden and Cost (Unfiltered Systems)Sources: Cost per sample from ICR for proposed Aircraft Drinking Water Rule, updated from 2006 to 2007 dollars. Burden estimates incorporate results of February 2008 consultations with drinking water industry representatives.Number of UnfilteredSystems (SW and GWUDI)PopulationCategoryHourlyLaborRateYearly SampleFreq.Labor Hours Per SampleLaborMicrobial ICR - SWTRB - 3July 2008CWS NTNC TNC (hrs)(cost)<100 $30.72 1 0 0 4848$1,474101-500 $30.72 4 0 0 115460$14,130501-1,000 $30.72 3 0 0 221663$20,3661,001-3,300 $30.72 15 0 0 4186,270$192,5973,301-10K $30.72 14 0 0 82611,564$355,21510,001-25K $30.72 9 0 0 1,41112,386$380,45725,001-50K $30.72 5 0 0 2,16011,280$346,47650,001-75K $30.72 3 0 0 2,9477,957$244,41475,001-100K $30.72 1 0 0 4,0705,291$162,525100,001-500K $30.72 4 0 0 7,39226,345$809,249500,001-1M $30.72 0 0 0 15,7926,885$211,498>1M $30.72 1 0 0 48,45648,456$1,488,436Total 60 0 0 137,605$4,226,837Note: Burden estimates incorporate results of February 2008 consultations with drinking water industry representatives.Exhibit B.4 - On Site Inspections and Watershed Management Burden and Cost(Unfiltered Systems)PopulationCategoryHourlyLaborRateHours/System/YearNumber of Unfiltered Systems (SWand GWUDI)Total Annual Burden and CostMicrobial ICR - SWTRB - 4July 2008CWS NTNC TNC CalibrationContinuousMonitoringVerification GrabSamples(15 min./day)*365(1 min/reading)*6 readings/day*365(10 min/sample)*1sample/day*365<100 $30.72 1 0 0 100% 91.3 36.5 60.8 189 $5,793101-500 $30.72 4 0 0 100% 91.3 36.5 60.8 754 $23,171501-1,000 $30.72 3 0 0 100% 91.3 36.5 60.8 566 $17,3781,001-3,300 $30.72 15 0 0 100% 91.3 36.5 60.8 2,829 $86,8913,301-10K $30.72 14 0 0 100% 91.3 36.5 60.8 2,640 $81,09910,001-25K $30.72 9 0 0 100% 91.3 36.5 60.8 1,655 $50,84925,001-50K $30.72 5 0 0 100% 91.3 36.5 60.8 985 $30,25050,001-100K $30.72 4 0 0 100% 91.3 36.5 60.8 754 $23,171100,001-1M $30.72 4 0 0 100% 91.3 36.5 60.8 754 $23,171>1M $30.72 1 0 0 100% 91.3 36.5 60.8 189 $5,793Total 60 0 011,315 $347,566The SWTR requires systems using continuous monitoring to "validate the continuous measurement on a regular basis using a protocol approved by the State" (40CFR 141.74(b)(3)). EPA assumes 1 verification sample per day.Exhibit B.5 - Raw Water Turbidity Monitoring Burden and Costs (Unfiltered Systems)Note: Burden estimates incorporate results of February 2008 consultation with water industry representatives.Labor Hours/System/Year(Collection, Analysis, and Reporting)PopulationCategoryHourlyLaborRate% Cont.MonitoringTotal LaborHours/YearTotal LaborCost/YearNumber of UnfilteredSystems (SW and GWUDI)Microbial ICR - SWTRB - 5July 2008CWS NTNC TNC CalibrationVerificationGrab SamplesContinuousMonitoringGrabSamplingContinuousMonitoring Grab SamplingContinuousMonitoring Grab SamplingContinuousMonitoring Grab Sampling1 per day1 per day Materials MaterialsUnit O&M costs *# SystemsUnit O&M costs *# Systems In-line turbidimeterBench-TopUnit1/7 of systemsreplace per year1/7 of systemsreplace per year<100 1 0 0 100% 365 365 $361 $361 $361 $361 $1,445 $1,144 $206 $163101-500 4 0 0 100% 365 365 $361 $361 $1,445 $1,445 $1,445 $1,144 $826 $654501-1,000 3 0 0 100% 365 365 $361 $361 $1,084 $1,084 $1,445 $1,144 $619 $4901,001-3,300 15 0 0 100% 365 365 $361 $361 $5,418 $5,418 $1,445 $1,144 $3,096 $2,4513,301-10K 14 0 0 100% 365 365 $361 $361 $5,057 $5,057 $1,445 $1,144 $2,890 $2,28810,001-25K 9 0 0 100% 365 365 $361 $361 $3,171 $3,171 $1,445 $1,144 $1,812 $1,43425,001-50K 5 0 0 100% 365 365 $361 $361 $1,886 $1,886 $1,445 $1,144 $1,078 $85350,001-100K 4 0 0 100% 365 365 $361 $361 $1,445 $1,445 $1,445 $1,144 $826 $654100,001-1M 4 0 0 100% 365 365 $361 $361 $1,445 $1,445 $1,445 $1,144 $826 $654>1M 1 0 0 100% 365 365 $361 $361 $361 $361 $1,445 $1,144 $206 $163Total 60 0 0$21,673 $21,673 $12,385 $9,805The SWTR requires systems using continuous monitoring to "validate the continuous measurement on a regular basis using a protocol approved by the State" (40 CFR 141.74(b)(3)). EPA assumes 1 verification sample per day.Annual Capital CostsNumber of UnfilteredSystems (SW andGWUDI)Exhibit B.6 - Raw Water Turbidity Monitoring O&M and Capital Costs (Unfiltered Systems)Activities/System/YearNote: O&M unit costs and capital unit costs have been updated from 2000 to 2007 dollars.Capital Unit CostsPopulationCategory% Cont.MonitoringAnnual O&M Unit CostsAnnual O&M CostsMicrobial ICR - SWTRB - 6July 2008CWS NTNC TNC CalibrationContinuousMonitoringVerificationGrab SamplesGrab SampleOnly(15 min./day)*365(1 min/reading)*6 readings/day*365(10 min/sample)*1sample/day*365(15 min/sample)*6sample/day*365<100 $30.72 230 68 335 50% 91.3 36.5 60.8 547.5 261,578 $8,034,971101-500 $30.72 328 74 188 50% 91.3 36.5 60.8 547.5 243,745 $7,487,178501-1,000 $30.72 49 8 8 100% 91.3 36.5 60.8 547.5 12,213 $375,1471,001-3,300 $30.72 184 6 8 100% 91.3 36.5 60.8 547.5 37,431 $1,149,7753,301-10K $30.72 120 1 2 100% 91.3 36.5 60.8 547.5 23,236 $713,75710,001-25K $30.72 42 0 0 100% 91.3 36.5 60.8 547.5 7,999 $245,71525,001-50K $30.72 25 0 0 100% 91.3 36.5 60.8 547.5 4,759 $146,17550,001-100K $30.72 40 0 0 100% 91.3 36.5 60.8 547.5 7,535 $231,445100,001-1M $30.72 37 0 0 100% 91.3 36.5 60.8 547.5 6,997 $214,918>1M $30.72 14 0 0 100% 91.3 36.5 60.8 547.5 2,633 $80,867Total 1,069 157 541608,125 $18,679,948Exhibit B.7 - Finished Water Turbidity Monitoring Burden and Costs (Filtered Systems)Note: The SWTR requirements for filtered systems apply only to those systems that do not use conventional or direct filtration.Systems using conventional or direct filtration monitor turbidity under the IESWTRand LT1ESWTR. EPA assumes that 50 percent of systems serving 500 or fewer will monitor turbidity with grab samples rather thancontinuous monitoring. The burden estimates shown here incorporate theresults of February 2008 consultations with water industry representatives.PopulationCategoryHourlyLaborRate% Cont.MonitoringTotal LaborHours/YearTotal LaborCost/YearNumber of Filtered NonPurchased Plants (SW andGWUDI)Labor Hours/System/Year(Collection, Analysis, and Reporting)Microbial ICR - SWTRB - 7July 2008CWS NTNC TNC CalibrationVerificationGrab SamplesRoutine GrabSamplesContinuousMonitoringGrabSamplingContinuousMonitoring Grab SamplingContinuousMonitoring Grab SamplingContinuousMonitoring Grab Sampling1 per day1 per day 6 per day Materials MaterialsUnit O&M costs *# SystemsUnit O&M costs *# Systems In-line turbidimeterBench-TopUnit1/7 of systemsreplace per year1/7 of systemsreplace per year<100 230 68 335 50% 365 365 2190 $361 $361 $114,208 $228,416 $1,445 $1,144 $65,262 $103,331101-500 328 74 188 50% 365 365 2190 $361 $361 $106,422 $212,843 $1,445 $1,144 $60,812 $96,286501-1,000 49 8 8 100% 365 365 N/A $361 $361 $23,393 $23,393 $1,445 $1,144 $13,368 $10,5831,001-3,300 184 6 8 100% 365 365 N/A $361 $361 $71,697 $71,697 $1,445 $1,144 $40,970 $32,4343,301-10K 120 1 2 100% 365 365 N/A $361 $361 $44,508 $44,508 $1,445 $1,144 $25,433 $20,13510,001-25K 42 0 0 100% 365 365 N/A $361 $361 $15,322 $15,322 $1,445 $1,144 $8,756 $6,93125,001-50K 25 0 0 100% 365 365 N/A $361 $361 $9,115 $9,115 $1,445 $1,144 $5,209 $4,12450,001-100K 40 0 0 100% 365 365 N/A $361 $361 $14,432 $14,432 $1,445 $1,144 $8,247 $6,529100,001-1M 37 0 0 100% 365 365 N/A $361 $361 $13,402 $13,402 $1,445 $1,144 $7,658 $6,063>1M 14 0 0 100% 365 365 N/A $361 $361 $5,043 $5,043 $1,445 $1,144 $2,882 $2,281Total 1,069 157 541$417,543 $638,172 $238,596 $288,697Annual Capital CostsNumber of Filtered NonPurchased Plants (SW andGWUDI)Exhibit B.8 - Finished Water Turbidity Monitoring O&M and Capital Costs (Filtered Systems)Activities/System/YearNote: The SWTR requirements for filtered systems apply only to those systems that do not use conventional or direct filtration.Systems using conventional or direct filtration monitor turbidity under the IESWTR and LT1ESWTR. EPA assumes that50 percent of SWTR systems serving 500 or fewer take grab samples only; the other 50 percent monitor continuously. O&M unit costs and capital unit costs updated from 2000 to 2007 dollars.Capital Unit CostsPopulationCategory% Cont.MonitoringAnnual O&M Unit CostsAnnual O&M CostsMicrobial ICR - SWTRB - 8July 2008Raw Water Coliforms Burden Per Sample (Unfiltered Systems)2004 Burden Task Revised Burden0.08 hr (4.8 min.) Sample Collection 1 hr0.08 hr (4.8 min.) Sample Analysis 1 hrOn Site Inspections and Watershed Management Burden per Year (Unfiltered Systems)2004 Burden Task System Size Revised Burden30,912 hrs On Site Inspections and Watershed Management >1M 48,456 hrsRaw Water Turbidity Monitoring Burden (Unfiltered Systems)2004 Burden Task Revised Burden5 min Calibration (Per Day) 15 min5 min Verification Grab Sample (Per Sample) 10 minFinished Water Turbidity Monitoring Burden (Filtered Systems)2004 Burden Task Revised Burden5 min Calibration (Per Day) 15 min5 min Verification Grab Sample (Per Sample) 10 min5 min Grab Sample Only (Per Sample) 15 minAssumes 50% of systems serving a population less than 500 monitor continuously.Note: Disinfectant residual monitoring is covered in the DBP/Chem/Rads ICR.Exhibit B.9Surface Water Treatment Rule - Summary of Original and Revised BurdenEstimatesMicrobial ICR - SWTRB - 9July 2008

# Appendix C

Total Coliform Rule SpreadsheetsRequirementAnnualRespondentsAvg. AnnualResponsesAnnualBurdenAnnual Burden(Labor) CostAnnual O&MCostAnnualCapital CostSystem Monitoring 155,693 973,454 3,464,341 $106,414,965 $77,457,439 N/ARequirementAnnualRespondentsAvg. AnnualResponsesAnnualBurdenAnnual Burden(Labor) CostAnnual O&MCostAnnualCapital CostMonitoring RelatedActivities57 1,868,316 467,079 $19,990,566 N/A N/ASanitary Surveys 57 9,194 123,940 $5,304,522 N/A N/ATotal 57 1,877,510 591,019 $25,295,088 N/A N/ANumber of responses for monitoring for states is based on number of PWS respondents and assumes 1 response per system per month.State burden for monitoring assumes 15 minutes to review each system's data each month.Exhibit C.1b - TCR State Burden and Cost SummaryExhibit C.1a - TCR PWS Burden and Cost SummaryNote: Sanitary survey burden for surface water systems is included under IESWTR. Sanitary survey burden for ground water systems for year 1 ofthis ICR period is included here. Sanitary survey burden for years 2 and 3 is included under the GWR (see App. G).Microbial ICR - Total Coliform RuleC - 1July 2008Exhibit C.2 - Calculating Average Number of TCR Samples for 3 System Types, CombinedAll PWSsMinimum Minimum AddtnlPopulation Routine/ Repeat Routines CWSs NTNCWSs TNCWSs Total PWSsRangemonth next mo Systems Samples Systems Samples Systems Samples Systems SamplesA B C D E=D*A F G=F*A H I=H*A J=D+F+H K=E+G+I25-500 1 4 4 29,282 29,282 16,034 16,034 81,873 81,873 127,189 127,189501-1k 1 4 4 5,678 5,678 1,829 1,829 2,081 2,081 9,588 9,5881,001-2.5K 2 3 3 6,496 12,992 749 1,498 618 1,236 7,863 15,7262,501-3.3K 3 3 2 1,732 5,196 84 252 52 156 1,868 5,6043,301-4.1K 4 3 1 1,184 4,736 46 184 34 136 1,264 5,0564,101-4.9K 5 3 0 821 4,105 15 75 17 85 853 4,2654,901-5.8K 6 3 0 761 4,566 20 120 20 120 801 4,8065,801-6.7K 7 3 0 590 4,130 12 84 7 49 609 4,2636,701-7.6K 8 3 0 446 3,568 13 104 10 80 469 3,7527,601-8.5K 9 3 0 416 3,744 4 36 5 45 425 3,8258,501-10k 10 3 0 604 6,040 10 100 9 90 623 6,23010,001-12.9k 10 3 0 667 6,670 7 70 3 30 677 6,77012,901-17.2K 15 3 0 763 11,445 5 75 6 90 774 11,61017,201-21.5K 20 3 0 455 9,100 1 20 0 0 456 9,12021,501-25K 25 3 0 303 7,575 0 0 2 50 305 7,62525,001-33K 30 3 0 447 13,410 4 120 1 30 452 13,56033,001-41K 40 3 0 336 13,440 1 40 0 0 337 13,48041,001-50K 50 3 0 204 10,200 3 150 0 0 207 10,35050,001-59K 60 3 0 178 10,680 0 0 1 60 179 10,74059,001-70K 70 3 0 151 10,570 0 0 1 70 152 10,64070,001-83K80 3 0 102 8,160 1 80 0 0 103 8,24083,001-96K 90 3 0 77 6,930 0 0 0 0 77 6,93096,001-130K 100 3 0 126 12,600 0 0 1 100 127 12,700130,001-220K 120 3 0 145 17,400 1 120 1 120 147 17,640220,001-320K 150 3 0 57 8,550 0 0 0 0 57 8,550320,001-450K 180 3 0 31 5,580 0 0 0 0 31 5,580450,001-600K 210 3 0 14 2,940 0 0 0 0 14 2,940600,001-780K 240 3 0 14 3,360 0 0 1 240 15 3,600780,001-970K 270 3 0 6 1,620 0 0 0 0 6 1,620970,001-1,230K 300 3 0 8 2,400 0 0 0 0 8 2,4001,230,001-1,520K 330 3 0 5 1,650 0 0 0 0 5 1,6501,520,001-1,850K 360 3 0 5 1,800 0 0 0 0 5 1,8001,850,001-2,270K 390 3 0 2 780 0 0 1 390 3 1,1702,270,001-3,020K 420 3 0 2 840 0 0 0 0 2 8403,020,001-3,960K 450 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0Over 3,960K 480 3 0 2 960 0 0 0 0 2 960Total 52,110 252,697 18,839 20,991 84,744 87,131 155,693 360,819TCR Samples - combined GW+SW/GWUDIAddtnl TNCWSsPopulation Routine Repeat RoutinesPopRangenext mo Sys Samples Sys Samples Sys Samples Sys SamplesA B C D E=D*A G H=G*A J K=J*A M=D+G+J N=E+H+K25-500 1.0 4 4 29,282 29,282 16,034 16,034 81,873 81873.00 127,189 127,189501-1k 1.0 4 4 5,678 5,678 1,829 1,829 2,081 2081.00 9,588 9,5881,001-2.5K 2.0 3 3 6,496 12,992 749 1,498 618 1236.00 7,863 15,7262,501-3.3K 3.0 3 2 1,732 5,196 84 252 52 156.00 1,868 5,6043,301-4.1K 4.0 3 1 1,184 4,736 46 184 34 136.00 1,264 5,0564,101-10K 7.2 3 0 3,638 26,153 74 519 68 469.00 3,780 27,14110,001-25k 15.9 3 0 2,188 34,790 13 165 11 170.00 2,212 35,12525,001-50k 37.5 3 0 987 37,050 8 310 1 30.00 996 37,390Over 50K 104.7 3 0 925 96,820 2 200 6 980.00 933 98,000Total 52,110 252,697 18,839 20,991 84,744 87131.00 155,693 360,819Source: SDWIS/FED Data from October, 2007CWSs NTNCWSs Total PWSsMicrobial ICR - Total Coliform RuleC - 2July 2008AddtnlPopulation Routine Repeat Routines CWSs NTNCWSs TNCWSs Total PWSsRangenext mo Systems Samples Systems Samples Systems Samples Systems SamplesA B C D E=D*A F G=F*A H I=H*A J=D+F+H K=E+G+I25-500 1 4 4 3,272 3,272 495 495 1,713 1,713 5,480 5,480501-1k 1 4 4 1,167 1,167 88 88 82 82 1,337 1,3371,001-2.5K 2 3 3 1,841 3,681 57 114 45 90 1,943 3,8852,501-3.3K 3 3 2 617 1,852 11 33 11 33 639 1,9183,301-4.1K 4 3 1 447 1,788 4 16 6 24 457 1,8284,101-4.9K 5 3 0 332 1,660 2 10 3 15 337 1,6854,901-5.8K 6 3 0 306 1,838 6 36 5 32 318 1,9065,801-6.7K 7 3 0 273 1,911 2 14 4 28 279 1,9536,701-7.6K 8 3 0 192 1,536 3 24 0 0 195 1,5607,601-8.5K 9 3 0 184 1,656 0 0 0 0 184 1,6568,501-10k 10 3 0 292 2,920 3 30 4 40 299 2,99010,001-12.9k 10 3 0 352 3,520 2 20 1 10 355 3,55012,901-17.2K 15 3 0 425 6,375 2 30 1 15 428 6,42017,201-21.5K 20 3 0 265 5,300 0 0 0 265 5,30021,501-25K 25 3 0 169 4,225 0 0 0 169 4,22525,001-33K 30 3 0 270 8,100 1 30 1 30 272 8,16033,001-41K 40 3 0 215 8,600 0 0 0 215 8,60041,001-50K 50 3 0 132 6,600 2 75 0 134 6,67550,001-59K 60 3 0 119 7,140 0 0 0 119 7,14059,001-70K 70 3 0 104 7,280 0 0 0 104 7,28070,001-83K80 3 0 73 5,840 1 80 0 74 5,92083,001-96K 90 3 0 65 5,850 0 0 65 5,85096,001-130K 100 3 0 94 9,400 0 0 0 94 9,400130,001-220K 120 3 0 116 13,920 1 120 1 120 118 14,160220,001-320K 150 3 0 52 7,800 0 0 52 7,800320,001-450K 180 3 0 27 4,860 0 0 27 4,860450,001-600K 210 3 0 12 2,520 0 0 12 2,520600,001-780K 240 3 0 12 2,880 0 0 0 12 2,880780,001-970K 270 3 0 5 1,350 0 0 5 1,350970,001-1,230K 300 3 0 7 2,100 0 0 7 2,1001,230,001-1,520K 330 3 0 4 1,320 0 0 4 1,3201,520,001-1,850K 360 3 0 5 1,800 0 0 5 1,8001,850,001-2,270K 390 3 0 1 390 0 1 390 2 7802,270,001-3,020K 420 3 0 2 840 0 0 2 8403,020,001-3,960K 450 3 0 0 0 0 0 0Over 3,960K 480 3 0 2 960 0 0 2 96011,452 142,252 680 1,215 1,878 2,622 14,009 146,089TCR Sampling - SW/GWUDIAddtnlPopulation Routine Repeat RoutinesPopRangenext mo Sys Samples Sys Samples Sys Samples Sys SamplesA B C D E=D*A G H=G*A J K=J*A M=D+G+J N=E+H+K25-500 1.0 4 4 3,272 3,272 495 495 1,713 1,713 5,480 5,480501-1k 1.0 4 4 1,167 1,167 88 88 82 82 1,337 1,3371,001-2.5K 2.0 3 3 1,841 3,681 57 114 45 90 1,943 3,8852,501-3.3K 3.0 3 2 617 1,852 11 33 11 33 639 1,9183,301-4.1K 4.0 3 1 447 1,788 4 16 6 24 457 1,8284,101-10K 7.3 3 0 1,579 11,521 16 114 16 115 1,612 11,75010,001-25k 16.0 3 0 1,211 19,420 4 50 2 25 1,217 19,49525,001-50k 37.8 3 0 617 23,300 3 105 1 30 621 23,435Over 50K 108.9 3 0 700 76,250 2 200 2 510 704 76,960Total 11,452 142,252 680 1,215 1,878 2,622 14,009 146,089TNCWSs - SW Total PWSs - SWCWSs - SW NTNCWSs - SWSURFACE/GWUDIExhibit C.2 (Continued). Average Number of TCR Samples for Surface/GWUDI SystemsMicrobial ICR - Total Coliform RuleC - 3July 2008Ground WaterAddtnlPopulation Routine Repeat Routines CWSs NTNCWSs TNCWSs Total PWSsRangenext mo Systems Samples Systems Samples Systems Samples Systems SamplesA B C D E=D*A F G=F*A H I=H*A J=D+F+H K=E+G+I25-500 1 4 4 26,010 26,010 15,539 15,539 80,160 80,160 121,709 121,709501-1k 1 4 4 4,511 4,511 1,741 1,741 1,999 1,999 8,251 8,2511,001-2.5K 2 3 3 4,655 9,311 692 1,384 573 1,146 5,920 11,8412,501-3.3K 3 3 2 1,115 3,344 73 219 41 123 1,229 3,6863,301-4.1K 4 3 1 737 2,948 42 168 28 112 807 3,2284,101-4.9K 5 3 0 489 2,445 13 65 14 70 516 2,5804,901-5.8K 6 3 0 455 2,728 14 84 15 88 483 2,9005,801-6.7K 7 3 0 317 2,219 10 70 3 21 330 2,3106,701-7.6K 8 3 0 254 2,032 10 80 10 80 274 2,1927,601-8.5K 9 3 0 232 2,088 4 36 5 45 241 2,1698,501-10k 10 3 0 312 3,120 7 70 5 50 324 3,24010,001-12.9k 10 3 0 315 3,150 5 50 2 20 322 3,22012,901-17.2K 15 3 0 338 5,070 3 45 5 75 346 5,19017,201-21.5K 20 3 0 190 3,800 1 20 0 191 3,82021,501-25K 25 3 0 134 3,350 0 2 50 136 3,40025,001-33K 30 3 0 177 5,310 3 90 0 0 180 5,40033,001-41K 40 3 0 121 4,840 1 40 0 122 4,88041,001-50K 50 3 0 72 3,600 2 75 0 74 3,67550,001-59K 60 3 0 59 3,540 0 1 60 60 3,60059,001-70K 70 3 0 47 3,290 0 1 70 48 3,36070,001-83K80 3 0 29 2,320 0 0 0 29 2,32083,001-96K 90 3 0 12 1,080 0 0 12 1,08096,001-130K 100 3 0 32 3,200 0 1 100 33 3,300130,001-220K 120 3 0 29 3,480 0 0 0 0 29 3,480220,001-320K 150 3 0 5 750 0 0 5 750320,001-450K 180 3 0 4 720 0 0 4 720450,001-600K 210 3 0 2 420 0 0 2 420600,001-780K 240 3 0 2 480 0 1 240 3 720780,001-970K 270 3 0 1 270 0 0 1 270970,001-1,230K 300 3 0 1 300 0 0 1 3001,230,001-1,520K 330 3 0 1 330 0 0 1 3301,520,001-1,850K 360 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 01,850,001-2,270K 390 3 0 1 390 0 0 0 1 3902,270,001-3,020K 420 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 03,020,001-3,960K 450 3 0 0 0 0 0 0Over 3,960K 480 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0Total 40,658 110,445 18,159 19,776 82,866 84,509 141,684 214,730TCR Sampling - Ground WaterMin Min AddtnlPopulation Samp/ Repeat RoutinesPopRangemonth next mo Sys Samples Sys Samples Sys Samples Sys SamplesA B C D E=D*A G H=G*A J K=J*A M=D+G+J N=E+H+K25-500 1.0 4 4 26,010 26,010 15,539 15,539 80,160 80,160 121,709 121,709501-1k 1.0 4 4 4,511 4,511 1,741 1,741 1,999 1,999 8,251 8,2511,001-2.5K 2.0 3 3 4,655 9,311 692 1,384 573 1,146 5,920 11,8412,501-3.3K 3.0 3 2 1,115 3,344 73 219 41 123 1,229 3,6863,301-4.1K 4.0 3 1 737 2,948 42 168 28 112 807 3,2284,101-10K 7.1 3 0 2,059 14,632 58 405 52 354 2,168 15,39110,001-25k 15.7 3 0 977 15,370 9 115 9 145 995 15,63025,001-50k 37.2 3 0 370 13,750 6 205 0 0 376 13,955Over 50K 91.4 3 0 225 20,570 0 0 4 470 229 21,040Total 40,658 110,445 18,159 19,776 82,866 84,509 141,684 214,730CWSs - GWExhibit C.2 (Continued). Average Number of TCR Samples for Ground Water SystemsTNCWSs - GW Total PWSs - GWNTNCWSs - GWMicrobial ICR - Total Coliform RuleC - 4July 2008Exhibit C.3 - Inventory of Systems with Violations (for Routine and Repeat Monitoring)InventoryViolation Rate Violation RatePopulation CWSs NTNCWSs TNCWSs NCWSs Population CWS NCWSRange GW SW/GUDI Total GW SW/GUDI Total GW SW/GUDI Total GW SW/GUDI Total Range GW SW/GUDI GW SW/GUDI25-500 26,010 3,272 29,282 15,539 495 16,034 80,160 1,713 81,873 95,699 2,208 97,907 25-500 5.37% 1.99% 4.56% 1.86%501-1K 4,511 1,167 5,678 1,741 88 1,829 1,999 82 2,081 3,740 170 3,910 501-1K 2.99% 1.71% 3.77% 3.53%1,001-2.5K 4,655 1,841 6,496 692 57 749 573 45 618 1,265 102 1,367 1,001-2.5K 3.51% 2.35% 4.66% 4.64%2,501-3.3K 1,115 617 1,732 73 11 84 41 11 52 114 22 136 2,501-3.3K 0.84% 0.79% 0.42% 1.00%3,301-4.1K 737 447 1,184 42 4 46 28 6 34 70 10 80 3,301-4.1K 1.39% 0.67% 2.82% 0.00%4,101-10K 2,059 1,579 3,638 58 16 74 52 16 68 110 32 142 4,101-10K 3.87% 2.38% 2.82% 0.00%10,001-25K 977 1,211 2,188 9 4 13 9 2 11 18 6 24 10,001-25K 3.93% 3.04% 3.26% 0.00%25,001-50K 370 617 987 6 3 8 0 1164925,001-50K 1.49% 1.55% 1.00% 0.00%Over 50K 225 700 925 0 2 2 4 26448Over 50K 2.22% 1.14% 0.00% 0.00%Total 40,658 11,452 52,110 18,159 680 18,83982,866 1,878 84,744101,025 2,558 103,583Source: TCR Inventory, pages C-1 through C-9CWSs with MCL Violations, TC+ Samples, No TC+ SamplesCWS Inventory CWSs with MCL Vios (# of Samples) CWSs with TC+ Samples CWSs with "Clean" SamplesPopulation (from TCR Inventory) 5.10% = Vio Rate 3 x # of Vios ( =Inventory-Sys w/TC+ )Range GW SW/GUDI Total GW SW/GUDI Total GW SW/GUDI Total GW SW/GUDI TotalA B C D E F G=D*3 H=E*3 I=F*3 J=A-G K=B-H L=C-I25-500 26,010 3,272 29,282 1,398 65 1,463 4,194 195 4,389 21,816 3,077 24,893501-1K 4,511 1,167 5,678 135 20 155 405 60 465 4,106 1,107 5,2131,001-2.5K 4,655 1,841 6,496 163 43 207 490 130 620 4,165 1,711 5,8762,501-3.3K 1,115 617 1,732 9 5 14 28 15 43 1,087 603 1,6893,301-4.1K 737 447 1,184 10 3 13 31 9 40 706 438 1,1444,101-10K 2,059 1,579 3,638 80 38 117 239 113 352 1,819 1,466 3,28610,001-25K 977 1,211 2,188 38 37 75 115 111 226 862 1,100 1,96225,001-50K 370 617 987 6 10 15 17 29 45 353 588 942Over 50K 225 700 925 5 8 13 15 24 39 210 676 886Total 40,658 11,452 52,110 1,845 228 2,073 5,534 684 6,218 35,125 10,767 45,892Inventory of Systems with Violations (for Routine and Repeat Monitoring) continuedNCWSs with MCL Violations, TC+ Samples, No TC+ SamplesNCWS Inventory NCWSs with MCL Vios NCWSs with TC+ Samples NCWSs with "Clean" SamplesPopulation (from TCR Inventory) 4.46% = Vio Rate 3 x # of Vios ( =Inventory-Sys w/TC+ )Range GW SW/GUDI Total GW SW/GUDI Total GW SW/GUDI Total GW SW/GUDI TotalA B C D E F G=D*3 H=E*3 I=F*3 J=A-G K=B-H L=C-I25-500 95,699 2,208 97,907 4,360 41 4,401 13,080 123 13,203 82,619 2,085 84,704501-1K 3,740 170 3,910 141 6 147 423 18 441 3,317 152 3,4691,001-2.5K 1,265 102 1,367 59 5 64 177 14 191 1,088 88 1,1762,501-3.3K 114 22 136 0 0 1 1 1 2 113 21 1343,301-4.1K 70 10 80 2 0 2 6 0 6 64 10 744,101-10K 110 32 142 3 0 3 9 0 9 100 32 13310,001-25K 18 6 24 1 0 1 2 0 2 16 6 2225,001-50K 6 4 9 0 0 0 0 00549Over 50K 4 4 8 0 0 0 0 00448Total 101,025 2,558 103,583 4,566 52 4618 13,698 156 13,854 87,327 2,402 89,729All Systems with MCL Violations, TC+ Samples, No TC+ SamplesTotal PWS Inventory PWSs with MCL Vios PWSs with TC+ Samples PWSs with "Clean" SamplesPopulation (CWS + NCWS) (CWS + NCWS) ( =Inventory-Sys w/TC+ )Range GW SW/GUDI Total GW SW/GUDI Total GW SW/GUDI Total GW SW/GUDI TotalA B C D E F G=D*3 H=E*3 I=F*3 J=A-G K=B-H L=C-I25-500 121,709 5,480 127,189 5,758 106 5864 17,274 318 17,592 104,435 5,162 109,597501-1K 8,251 1,337 9,588 276 26 302 828 78 906 7,423 1,259 8,6821,001-2.5K 5,920 1,943 7,863 222 48 270 667 144 811 5,253 1,799 7,0522,501-3.3K 1,229 639 1,868 10 5 15 30 15 45 1,199 624 1,8233,301-4.1K 807 457 1,264 12 3 15 37 9 46 770 448 1,2184,101-10K 2,168 1,612 3,780 83 38 120 248 113 361 1,920 1,499 3,41910,001-25K 995 1,217 2,212 39 37 76 117 111 228 878 1,106 1,98425,001-50K 376 621 996 6 10 15 17 29 45 359 592 951Over 50K 229 704 933 5 8 13 15 24 39 214 680 894Total 141,684 14,009 155,693 6,411 280 6690.79232 19,232 840 20,072 122,452 13,169 135,621Inventory for Calculating Inventory for CalculatingPopulation Routine Monitoring Repeat/Addtl Routine MonRange GW* SW/GUDI Total GW SW/GUDI TotalMNO P Q R25-500 - TC+* 17,274 318 17,592 17,274 318 17,59225-500 - rest 104,435 5,162 109,597 0 0 0501-1K - TC+* 828 78 906 828 78 906501-1K - rest 7,423 1,259 8,682 0 0 01,001-2.5K 5,920 1,943 7,863 667 144 8112,501-3.3K 1,229 639 1,868 30 15 453,301-4.1K 807 457 1,264 37 9 464,101-10K 2,168 1,612 3,780 248 113 36110,001-25K 995 1,217 2,212 117 111 22825,001-50K 376 621 996 17 29 45Over 50K 229 704 933 15 24 39Total 141,684 14,009 155,693 19,232 840 20,072* GW CWSs (serving 1,000 or less) with TC+ results sample monthly rather than quarterly.(CWS + NCWS)Source: Violation rates based on SDWIS data on the number ofsystems w/monthly TCR violations from the FY07Q03 frozendatabaseSource: Number of systems with violations from SDWIS FY2007. Assumes that for every system with a violation, there are 3 systems with TC+ samples that trigger repeatsampling and in some cases additional routine monitoring.Source: Number of systems with violations from SDWIS FY2007. Assumes that for every system with a violation, there are 3 systems with TC+ samples that trigger repeatsampling and in some cases additional routine monitoring.Microbial ICR - Total Coliform RuleC - 5July 2008Exhibit C.4 - Sampling - Burden, Cost, and Frequencies of MonitoringGWSize Labor Labor Hours Required Analytical Cost/Sample Monitoring Number of Minimum Addtl For Systems that are TC+, Routine Sliding TC+Category Rates Collection AnalysisSamples for Total Coliforms Samples for Fecal/E.coliFrequency per Year Routine Repeat Routines Percentage of Routine Samples Repeat scale- TC+ Repeat($/hr)(hrs/sample) (hrs/sample) PurchServ O&M-matrl O&M-labor PurchServ O&M-matrl O&M-labor Most Other*Smp/Sys Samples next moSamples Assumed to Be TC+that=TC+ RepeatsA B C D E F=C*A G H I=C*A J K L M N O P=L*O Q=P*M R S=Q*R25-500 $30.72 0.5 0.166667 $0.00 $21.21 $5.12 $0.00 $21.21 $5.12 4 12 1.0 4 4 100% 1.0 4.0 50% 2.0501-1K $30.72 0.5 0.166667 $0.00 $21.21 $5.12 $0.00 $21.21 $5.12 4 12 1.0 4 4 100% 1.0 4.0 50% 2.01,001-2.5K $30.72 0.5 0.166667 $0.00 $21.21 $5.12 $0.00 $21.21 $5.12 12 2.0 3 3 50% 1.0 3.0 50% 1.52,501-3.3K $30.72 0.5 0.166667 $0.00 $21.21 $5.12 $0.00 $21.21 $5.12 12 3.0 3 2 50% 1.5 4.5 25% 1.13,301-4.1K $30.72 0.5 0.166667 $0.00 $21.21 $5.12 $0.00 $21.21 $5.12 12 4.0 3 1 50% 2.0 6.0 25% 1.54,101-10K $30.72 0.5 0.166667 $0.00 $21.21 $5.12 $0.00 $21.21 $5.12 12 7.1 3 0 25% 1.8 5.4 25% 1.410,001-25K $30.72 1.0 0.166667 $0.00 $21.21 $5.12 $0.00 $21.21 $5.12 12 15.7 3 0 25% 3.9 11.7 25% 2.925,001-50K $30.72 1.0 0.166667 $0.00 $21.21 $5.12 $0.00 $21.21 $5.12 12 37.2 3 0 10% 3.7 11.1 25% 2.8Over 50K $30.72 1.0 0.166667 $0.00 $21.21 $5.12 $0.00 $21.21 $5.12 12 91.4 3 0 10% 9.1 27.3 10% 2.7SW/GWUDISize Labor Labor Hours Required Analytical Cost/Sample Number of Minimum Addtl For Systems that are TC+, Routine Sliding TC+Category Rates Collection AnalysisSamples for Total Coliforms Samples for Fecal/E.coliRoutine Repeat Routines Percentage of Routine Samples Repeat scale-TC+ Repeat($/hr) (hrs/sample) (hrs/sample) PurchServ O&M-matrl O&M-labor PurchServ O&M-matrl O&M-laborSmp/Sys Samples next moSamples Assumed to Be TC+that=TC+ RepeatA B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P=L*O Q=P*M R S=Q*R25-500 $30.72 0.5 0.166667 $0.00 $21.21 $5.12 $0.00 $21.21 $5.12 12 1.0 4 4 100% 1.0 4.0 50% 2.0501-1K $30.72 0.5 0.166667 $0.00 $21.21 $5.12 $0.00 $21.21 $5.12 12 1.0 4 4 100% 1.0 4.0 50% 2.01,001-2.5K $30.72 0.5 0.166667 $0.00 $21.21 $5.12 $0.00 $21.21 $5.12 12 2.0 3 3 50% 1.0 3.0 50% 1.52,501-3.3K $30.72 0.5 0.166667 $0.00 $21.21 $5.12 $0.00 $21.21 $5.12 12 3.0 3 2 50% 1.5 4.5 25% 1.13,301-4.1K $30.72 0.5 0.166667 $0.00 $21.21 $5.12 $0.00 $21.21 $5.12 12 4.0 3 1 50% 2.0 6.0 25% 1.54,101-10K $30.72 0.5 0.166667 $0.00 $21.21 $5.12 $0.00 $21.21 $5.12 12 7.3 3 0 25% 1.8 5.4 25% 1.410,001-25K $30.72 1.0 0.166667 $0.00 $21.21 $5.12 $0.00 $21.21 $5.12 12 16.0 3 0 25% 4.0 12.0 25% 3.025,001-50K $30.72 1.0 0.166667 $0.00 $21.21 $5.12 $0.00 $21.21 $5.12 12 37.8 3 0 10% 3.8 11.4 25% 2.9Over 50K $30.72 1.0 0.166667 $0.00 $21.21 $5.12 $0.00 $21.21 $5.12 12 108.9 3 0 10% 10.9 32.7 10% 3.3Notes: Labor estimates take into account the results of February 2008 consultations with water industryrepresentatives. Overall sample costs are conservative estimates. Many systems now use a method allowing forboth total coliforms and fecal/E.coli to be tested at one time. Average sample cost based on research conductedfor the Aircraft Drinking Water Rule in Nov. 2006.Note: Number of routine samples per system from TCR Inventory page. Number is a weighted average based on number of systems ineach size category.* GW CWSs serving <=1,000 with TC-positive samples monitor monthly rather than quarterly.Note: Number of routine samples per system from TCR Inventory page. Number is a weighted average based on number of systems ineach size category.MonitoringFrequencyper YearMicrobial ICR - Total Coliform RuleC - 6July 2008Exhibit C.5 - Routine Monitoring - Burden and Costa. Routine-GWMonitoring Routine Total Labor (per System per Year) O&M Total Burden Cost (per System per Year) Total CostGW Routine MonitoringSize Number of Frequency Samples/ Samples/ Sample Collection Analysis (in-house) Analytical Costs per System O&M Labor per System Total Annual Total Annual O&M Cost Labor CostCategoryPWSs per YearSysSys/Yr(hrs) (cost) (hrs) (cost) Materials (hrs)per YearBurden - HoursCostA (from"SystemswithViolations")B = J or Kfrom"Sampling"C = Lfrom"Sampling"D = B * C E = D*B from"Sampling"F = E*A from"Sampling"G = D*C from"Sampling"H= G*A from"Sampling"I = D*E from"Sampling"J = E+G K = I L = F+ H M = K + L N = A * J O = A * M P = A * K Q = A * L25-500 - TC+* 17,274 12 1.0 12.0 6.0 $184.30 2.0 $61.43 $254.49 8.0 $254.49 $245.74 $500.23 138,192.0 $8,640,900.50 $4,396,019.17 $4,244,881.3325-500 - rest 104,435 4 1.0 4.0 2.0$61.43 0.7 $21.50 $84.83 2.7 $84.83 $82.94 $167.77 281,974.5 $17,520,625.82 $8,859,138.25 $8,661,487.57501-1K - TC+* 828 12 1.0 12.0 6.0 $184.30 2.0 $61.43 $254.49 8.0 $254.49 $245.74 $500.23 6,624.0 $414,186.96 $210,715.75 $203,471.21501-1K - rest 7,423 4 1.0 4.0 2.0$61.43 0.7 $21.50 $84.83 2.7 $84.83 $82.94 $167.77 20,041.5 $1,245,291.37 $629,669.77 $615,621.601,001-2.5K 5,920 12 2.0 24.0 12.0 $368.61 4.0 $122.87 $508.98 16.0 $508.98 $491.48 $1,000.45 94,725.7 $5,923,030.77 $3,013,315.20 $2,909,715.572,501-3.3K 1,229 12 3.0 36.0 18.0 $552.91 6.0 $184.30 $763.46 24.0 $763.46 $737.21 $1,500.68 29,487.4 $1,843,797.63 $938,023.73 $905,773.903,301-4.1K 807 12 4.0 48.0 24.0 $737.21 8.0 $245.74 $1,017.95 32.0 $1,017.95 $982.95 $2,000.90 25,824.0 $1,614,728.89 $821,486.04 $793,242.854,101-10K 2,168 12 7.1 85.3 42.6 $1,308.56 14.2 $436.19 $1,808.78 56.8 $1,808.78 $1,744.74 $3,553.52 123,161.4 $7,705,229.03 $3,922,047.26 $3,783,181.7710,001-25K 995 12 15.7 188.8 188.8 $5,799.42 31.5 $967.59 $4,003.56 220.3 $4,003.56 $6,767.02 $10,770.57 219,198.5 $10,716,718.83 $3,983,538.76$6,733,180.0725,001-50K 376 12 37.2 445.9 445.9 $13,696.83 74.3 $2,282.29 $9,457.31 520.2 $9,457.31 $15,979.13 $25,436.44 195,335.1 $9,551,381.51 $3,551,220.00 $6,000,161.50Over 50K 229 12 91.4 1,097.1 1097.1 $33,699.92 182.8 $5,615.12 $23,265.82 1279.9 $23,265.82 $39,315.04 $62,580.86 293,097.1 $14,331,017.17 $5,327,873.67 $9,003,143.50Total 141,684 1,957.1 1,844.4 $56,654.94 326.2 $10,019.97 $41,504.50 2,170.6 $41,504.50 $66,674.91 $108,179.41 1,427,661.3 $79,506,908.47 $35,653,047.60 $43,853,860.87*GW CWSs serving 1000 or fewer with TC-positive samples.b. Routine-SWMonitoring Routine Total Labor (per System per Year) O&M Total Burden Cost (per System per Year) Total CostSW Routine MonitoringSize Number ofFrequencySamples/Samples/Sample CollectionAnalysis (in-houseAnalytical Costsper System O&M Laborper System Total Annua Total Annua O&M CostLabor CostCategoryPWSs per YearSysSys/Yr(hrs) (cost) (hrs) (cost) Materials (hrs) (F+H) (I+J)per YearBurdenCostA (from"SystemswithViolations")B = J or Kfrom"Sampling"C = Lfrom"Sampling"D = B * C E = D*B from"Sampling"F = E*A from"Sampling"G = D*C from"Sampling"H= G*A from"Sampling"I = D*E from"Sampling"J = E+G K = I L = F+ H M = K + L N = A * J O = A * M P = A * K Q = A * L25-500 5,480 12 1.0 12.0 6.0 $184.30 2.0 $61.43 $254.49 8.0 $254.49 $245.74 $500.23 43,840.0 $2,741,237.39 $1,394,592.17 $1,346,645.23501-1K 1,337 12 1.0 12.0 6.0 $184.30 2.0 $61.43 $254.49 8.0 $254.49 $245.74 $500.23 10,697.6 $668,904.73 $340,302.26 $328,602.461,001-2.5K 1,943 12 2.0 24.0 12.0 $368.61 4.0 $122.87 $508.98 16.0 $508.98 $491.48 $1,000.45 31,082.3 $1,943,520.18 $988,757.13 $954,763.052,501-3.3K 639 12 3.0 36.0 18.0 $552.91 6.0 $184.30 $763.46 24.0 $763.46 $737.21 $1,500.68 15,344.6 $959,467.77 $488,124.90 $471,342.873,301-4.1K 457 12 4.0 48.0 24.0 $737.21 8.0 $245.74 $1,017.95 32.0 $1,017.95 $982.95 $2,000.90 14,624.0 $914,412.77 $465,203.37 $449,209.394,101-10K 1,612 12 7.3 87.5 43.8 $1,345.42 14.6 $448.47 $1,856.43 58.4 $1,856.43 $1,793.89 $3,650.32 94,121.3 $5,883,101.22 $2,991,952.14 $2,891,149.0710,001-25K 1,217 12 16.0 192.4 192.4 $5,910.00 32.1 $986.02 $4,081.05 224.5 $4,081.05 $6,896.03 $10,977.08 273,216.5 $13,359,101.59 $4,966,635.90 $8,392,465.6925,001-50K 621 12 37.8 453.2 453.2 $13,921.07 75.5 $2,319.15 $9,610.31 528.7 $9,610.31 $16,240.22 $25,850.53 328,058.4 $16,040,255.41 $5,963,197.67 $10,077,057.75Over 50K 704 12 108.9 1,307.1 1307.1 $40,150.55 217.9 $6,693.29 $27,720.97 1525.0 $27,720.97 $46,843.84 $74,564.81 1,073,600.0 $52,493,628.83 $19,515,565.03 $32,978,063.81Total 14,009 2,172.3 2,062.5 $63,354.37 362.1 $11,122.72 $46,068.13 2,424.6 $46,068.13 $74,477.10 $120,545.23 1,884,584.6 $95,003,629.89 $37,114,330.57 $57,889,299.32Microbial ICR - Total Coliform RuleC - 7July 2008Exhibit C.6 - Repeat Monitoring - Burden and Costa. Repeat-GWRepeat Labor (per System per Year) O&M Total Burden Cost (per System Per Year) Total Cost GW Repeat MonitoringSize Samples/ Sample Collection Analysis (in-house) Analytical Costs (per System O&M Labor (per System Total Number Total Annual Total Annual O&M Cost Labor CostCategoryPWSs System(hrs) (cost) (hrs) (cost) Materials per Year) (hrs)per Year) of Samples Burden CostA (from"SystemswithViolations)B = Q from"Sampling"C = B*B from"Sampling"D = C*A from"Sampling"E = B *C from"Sampling"F = E*A from"Sampling"G = B*E from"Sampling"H = C + E J = G K = D + F L = J + K M = A * B N = A * H O = A * L P = A * J Q = A * K25-500 17,274 4 2.0 $61.43 0.7 $21.50 $84.83 2.7 $84.83 $82.93 $167.76 69096 46,639.8 $2,897,886.24 $1,465,353.42 $1,432,532.82501-1K 828 4 2.0 $61.43 0.7 $21.50 $84.83 2.7 $84.83 $82.93 $167.76 3312 2,235.6 $138,905.28 $70,239.24 $68,666.041,001-2.5K 667 3 1.5 $46.08 0.5 $15.36 $63.62 2.0 $63.62 $61.44 $125.06 2001 1,333.8 $83,401.08 $42,427.45 $40,973.632,501-3.3K 30 4.5 2.3 $70.65 0.8 $24.57 $95.43 3.1 $95.43 $95.22 $190.65 133 91.6 $5,630.88 $2,818.54 $2,812.343,301-4.1K 37 6 3.0 $92.15 1.0 $30.72 $127.24 4.0 $127.24 $122.87 $250.11 219 146.3 $9,145.27 $4,652.53 $4,492.744,101-10K 248 5.4 2.7 $82.94 0.9 $27.65 $114.52 3.6 $114.52 $110.59 $225.11 1341 894.2 $55,917.86 $28,447.04 $27,470.8210,001-25K 117 11.7 11.7 $359.39 2.0 $61.43 $248.13 13.7 $248.13 $420.82 $668.95 1369 1,602.5 $78,248.53 $29,024.30 $49,224.2225,001-50K 17 11.1 11.1 $340.96 1.9 $58.36 $235.40 13.0 $235.40 $399.32 $634.72 185 216.9 $10,592.35 $3,928.41 $6,663.94Over 50K 15 27.3 27.3 $838.58 4.6 $141.30 $578.96 31.9 $578.96 $979.88 $1,558.84 410 478.5 $23,382.60 $8,684.40 $14,698.20Total 19,232 63.6 $1,953.61 13.1 $402.39 $1,632.96 76.7 $1,632.96 $2,356.00 $3,988.96 78,06653,639.2 $3,303,110.09 $1,655,575.33 $1,647,534.75Note: Systems with TC-positive samples are required to take 4 repeat samples for each TC-positive sample if they serve 1,000 people or fewer. Larger systems must take 3 repeat samples for each TC-positive sample.b. Repeat-SWRepeat Labor (per System per Year) O&M Total Burden Cost (per System Per Year) Total Cost SW Repeat MonitoringSize Samples/ Sample Collection Analysis (in-house) Analytical Costs (per System O&M Labor (per System Total Number Total Annual Total Annual O&M Cost Labor CostCategoryPWSs System(hrs) (cost) (hrs) (cost) Materials per Year) (hrs)per Year) of Samples Burden Cost(C x R) (C x S)A (from"SystemswithViolations)B = Q from"Sampling"C = B*B from"Sampling"D = C*A from"Sampling"E = B *C from"Sampling"F = E*A from"Sampling"G = B*E from"Sampling"H = C + E J = G K = D + F L = J + K M = A * B N = A * H O = A * L P = A * J Q = A * K25-500 318 4 2.0 $61.43 0.7 $21.50 $84.83 2.7 $84.83 $82.93 $167.76 1272 858.6 $53,347.68 $26,975.94 $26,371.74501-1K 78 4 2.0 $61.43 0.7 $21.50 $84.83 2.7 $84.83 $82.93 $167.76 312 210.6 $13,085.28 $6,616.74 $6,468.541,001-2.5K 144 3 1.5 $46.08 0.5 $15.36 $63.62 2.0 $63.62 $61.44 $125.06 431 287.5 $17,976.83 $9,145.10 $8,831.732,501-3.3K 15 4.5 2.3 $70.65 0.8 $24.57 $95.43 3.1 $95.43 $95.22 $190.65 69 47.2 $2,904.20 $1,453.70 $1,450.503,301-4.1K 9 6 3.0 $92.15 1.0 $30.72 $127.24 4.0 $127.24 $122.87 $250.11 54 36.2 $2,263.64 $1,151.60 $1,112.054,101-10K 113 5.4 2.7 $82.94 0.9 $27.65 $114.52 3.6 $114.52 $110.59 $225.11 610 406.8 $25,435.60 $12,939.83 $12,495.7710,001-25K 111 12 12.0 $368.61 2.0 $61.43 $254.49 14.0 $254.49 $430.04 $684.53 1327 1,548.3 $75,705.76 $28,145.38 $47,560.3825,001-50K 29 11.4 11.4 $350.18 1.9 $58.36 $241.76 13.3 $241.76 $408.54 $650.30 327 381.8 $18,669.48 $6,940.69 $11,728.79Over 50K 24 32.7 32.7 $1,004.45 5.5 $168.94 $693.48 38.2 $693.48 $1,173.39 $1,866.87 785 916.8 $44,804.88 $16,643.52 $28,161.36Total 840 69.6 $2,137.92 14.0 $430.03 $1,760.20 83.6 $1,760.20 $2,567.95 $4,328.15 5,1874,693.8 $254,193.35 $110,012.50 $144,180.86Note: Systems with TC-positive samples are required to take 4 repeat samples for each TC-positive sample if they serve 1,000 people or fewer. Larger systems must take 3 repeat samples for each TC-positive sample.Microbial ICR - Total Coliform RuleC - 8July 2008Exhibit C.7 - Fecal / E.coli Monitoring - Burden and Costa. Fecal/E. Coli - GWTC+ Labor (per System per Year) O&M Total Burden Cost (per System per Year)Total Cost GW Fecal/E. coli MonitoringSize Samples/ Sample Collection Analysis (in-house) Analytical Costs (per System O&M Labor (per System Total Annual Total Annual O&M Cost Labor CostCategory PWSs System(hrs) (cost) (hrs) (cost) Materials per Year) (hrs)per Year) Burden CostA (from"Systems withViolations")B = P + S(both from"Sampling")C = B *B (from"Sampling")D = C *A (from"Sampling")E = B *C (from"Sampling")F = E *A (from"Sampling")G = B *H (from"Sampling")H = C + E I = G J = D + F K = I + J L = A * H M = A * K N = A * I O = A * J25-500 17,274 3.0 1.5 $46.08 0.5 $15.36 $63.62 2.0 $63.62 $61.44 $125.06 34,548.0 $2,160,286.44 $1,098,971.88 $1,061,314.56501-1K 828 3.0 1.5 $46.08 0.5 $15.36 $63.62 2.0 $63.62 $61.44 $125.06 1,656.0 $103,549.68 $52,677.36 $50,872.321,001-2.5K 667 2.5 1.3 $39.93 0.4 $12.29 $53.02 1.7 $53.02 $52.22 $105.24 1,133.7 $70,183.35 $35,358.43 $34,824.922,501-3.3K 30 2.6 1.3 $39.93 0.4 $12.29 $55.14 1.7 $55.14 $52.22 $107.36 50.2 $3,170.89 $1,628.57 $1,542.333,301-4.1K 37 3.5 1.8 $55.29 0.6 $18.43 $74.23 2.4 $74.23 $73.72 $147.95 87.8 $5,409.79 $2,714.22 $2,695.574,101-10K 248 3.2 1.6 $49.15 0.5 $15.36 $67.86 2.1 $67.86 $64.51 $132.37 521.6 $32,881.03 $16,856.59 $16,024.4410,001-25K 117 6.8 6.8 $208.88 1.1 $33.79 $144.21 7.9 $144.21 $242.67 $386.88 924.1 $45,254.19 $16,868.56 $28,385.6325,001-50K 17 6.5 6.5 $199.66 1.1 $33.79 $137.85 7.6 $137.85 $233.45 $371.30 126.8 $6,196.34 $2,300.47 $3,895.87Over 50K 15 11.8 11.8 $362.46 2.0 $61.43 $250.25 13.8 $250.25 $423.89 $674.14 207.0 $10,112.10 $3,753.75 $6,358.35Total 19,232 34.1 $1,047.46 7.1 $218.10 $909.80 41.2 $909.80 $1,265.56 $2,175.36 39,255.2 $2,437,043.81 $1,231,129.83 $1,205,913.99Each system with a TC-positive sample must check that sample for fecal coliform or E. coli.b. Fecal/E. Coli - SWTC+ Labor (per System per Year) O&M Total Cost (per System per Year)Total Cost SW Fecal/E. coli MonitoringSize Samples/ Sample Collection Analysis (in-house) Analytical Costs (per System O&M Labor (per System Total Annual Total Annual O&M Cost Labor CostCategory PWSs System(hrs) (cost) (hrs) (cost) Materials per Year) (hrs)per Year) Burden CostA (from"Systems withViolations")B = P + S(both from"Sampling")C = B *B (from"Sampling")D = C *A (from"Sampling")E = B *C (from"Sampling")F = E *A (from"Sampling")G = B *H (from"Sampling")H = C + E I = G J = D + F K = I + J L = A * H M = A * K N = A * I O = A * J25-500 318 3.0 1.5 $46.08 0.5 $15.36 $63.62 2.0 $63.62 $61.44 $125.06 636.0 $39,769.08 $20,231.16 $19,537.92501-1K 78 3.0 1.5 $46.08 0.5 $15.36 $63.62 2.0 $63.62 $61.44 $125.06 156.0 $9,754.68 $4,962.36 $4,792.321,001-2.5K 144 2.5 1.3 $39.93 0.4 $12.29 $53.02 1.7 $53.02 $52.22 $105.24 244.4 $15,127.79 $7,621.39 $7,506.402,501-3.3K 15 2.6 1.3 $39.93 0.4 $12.29 $55.14 1.7 $55.14 $52.22 $107.36 25.9 $1,635.43 $839.96 $795.483,301-4.1K 9 3.5 1.8 $55.29 0.6 $18.43 $74.23 2.4 $74.23 $73.72 $147.95 21.7 $1,339.03 $671.82 $667.214,101-10K 113 3.2 1.6 $49.15 0.5 $15.36 $67.86 2.1 $67.86 $64.51 $132.37 237.3 $14,956.73 $7,667.63 $7,289.1110,001-25K 111 7.0 7.0 $215.02 1.2 $36.86 $148.45 8.2 $148.45 $251.88 $400.33 906.9 $44,274.59 $16,417.86 $27,856.7325,001-50K 29 6.7 6.7 $205.81 1.1 $33.79 $142.09 7.8 $142.09 $239.60 $381.69 223.9 $10,957.95 $4,079.27 $6,878.68Over 50K 24 14.2 14.2 $436.19 2.4 $73.72 $301.14 16.6 $301.14 $509.91 $811.05 398.4 $19,465.20 $7,227.36 $12,237.84Total 840 36.9 $1,133.48 7.6 $233.46 $969.17 44.5 $969.17 $1,366.94 $2,336.11 2,850.5 $157,280.48 $69,718.81 $87,561.69Each system with a TC-positive sample must check that sample for fecal coliform or E. coli.Microbial ICR - Total Coliform RuleC - 9July 2008Exhibit C.8 - Additional Routine Monitoring - Burden and Costa. Additional Routines - GWTC+ Labor (per System per Year) O&M Total Burden Cost (per System per Year)Total Cost GW Addtl Routine MonitoringSize Samples/ Sample Collection Analysis (in-house) Analytical Costs (per System O&M Labor (per System Total Annual Total Annual O&M Cost Labor CostCategory PWSs System(hrs) (cost) (hrs) (cost) Materials per Year) (hrs)per Year) Burden CostA (from"SystemswithViolations")B = N (from"Sampling")C = B *B (from"Sampling")D = C *A (from"Sampling")E = B *C (from"Sampling")F = E *A (from"Sampling")G = B *E (from"Sampling")H = C + E I = G J = D + F K = I + J L = A * H M = A * K N = A * I O = A * J25-500 17,274 4.0 2.0 $61.43 0.7 $21.50 $84.83 2.7 $84.83 $82.93 $167.76 46,639.8 ########### $1,465,353.42 $1,432,532.82501-1K 828 4.0 2.0 $61.43 0.7 $21.50 $84.83 2.7 $84.83 $82.93 $167.76 2,235.6 $138,905.28 $70,239.24 $68,666.041,001-2.5K 667 3.0 1.5 $46.08 0.5 $15.36 $63.62 2.0 $63.62 $61.44 $125.06 1,333.8 $83,401.08 $42,427.45 $40,973.632,501-3.3K 30 2.0 1.0 $30.72 0.3 $9.22 $42.41 1.3 $42.41 $39.94 $82.35 38.4 $2,432.22 $1,252.59 $1,179.633,301-4.1K 37 1.0 0.5 $15.36 0.2 $6.14 $21.21 0.7 $21.21 $21.50 $42.71 25.6 $1,561.69 $775.54 $786.154,101-10K 248 0.0 0.0 $0.00 0.0 $0.00 $0.00 0.0 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 0.0 $0.00 $0.00 $0.0010,001-25K 117 0.0 0.0 $0.00 0.0 $0.00 $0.00 0.0 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 0.0 $0.00 $0.00 $0.0025,001-50K 17 0.0 0.0 $0.00 0.0 $0.00 $0.00 0.0 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 0.0 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00Over 50K 15 0.0 0.0 $0.00 0.0 $0.00 $0.00 0.0 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 0.0 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00Total 19,232 7.0 $215.02 2.4 $73.72 $296.90 9.4 $296.90 $288.74 $585.64 50,273.2 ########### $1,580,048.24 $1,544,138.27Systems that collect fewer than 5 routine samples per month must collect 5 routine samples the month following a TC-positive sample. Depending on system size, systems will be required to take 1-4 additional routine samples to bring the total to 5 samples.b. Additional Routines - SWTC+ Labor (per System per Year) O&M Total Burden Cost (per System per Year)Total Cost SW Addtl Routine MonitoringSize Samples/ Sample Collection Analysis (in-house) Analytical Costs (per System O&M Labor (per System Total Annual Total Annual O&M Cost Labor CostCategory PWSs System(hrs) (cost) (hrs) (cost) Materials per Year) (hrs)per Year) Burden CostA (from"SystemswithViolations")B = N (from"Sampling")C = B *B (from"Sampling")D = C *A (from"Sampling")E = B *C (from"Sampling")F = E *A (from"Sampling")G = B *E (from"Sampling")H = C + E I = G J = D + F K = I + J L = A * H M = A * K N = A * I O = A * J25-500 318 4.0 2.0 $61.43 0.7 $21.50 $84.83 2.7 $84.83 $82.93 $167.76 858.6 $53,347.68 $26,975.94 $26,371.74501-1K 78 4.0 2.0 $61.43 0.7 $21.50 $84.83 2.7 $84.83 $82.93 $167.76 210.6 $13,085.28 $6,616.74 $6,468.541,001-2.5K 144 3.0 1.5 $46.08 0.5 $15.36 $63.62 2.0 $63.62 $61.44 $125.06 287.5 $17,976.83 $9,145.10 $8,831.732,501-3.3K 15 2.0 1.0 $30.72 0.3 $9.22 $42.41 1.3 $42.41 $39.94 $82.35 19.8 $1,254.45 $646.04 $608.413,301-4.1K 9 1.0 0.5 $15.36 0.2 $6.14 $21.21 0.7 $21.21 $21.50 $42.71 6.3 $386.55 $191.96 $194.594,101-10K 113 0.0 0.0 $0.00 0.0 $0.00 $0.00 0.0 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 0.0 $0.00 $0.00 $0.0010,001-25K 111 0.0 0.0 $0.00 0.0 $0.00 $0.00 0.0 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 0.0 $0.00 $0.00 $0.0025,001-50K 29 0.0 0.0 $0.00 0.0 $0.00 $0.00 0.0 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 0.0 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00Over 50K 24 0.0 0.0 $0.00 0.0 $0.00 $0.00 0.0 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 0.0 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00Total 840 7.0 $215.02 2.4 $73.72 $296.90 9.4 $296.90 $288.74 $585.64 1,382.8 $86,050.79 $43,575.78 $42,475.01Systems that collect fewer than 5 routine samples per month must collect 5 routine samples the month following a TC-positive sample. Depending on system size, systems will be required to take 1-4 additional routine samples to bring the total to 5 samples.Microbial ICR - Total Coliform RuleC - 10July 2008Exhibit C.9 - System Responses - Monitoring EventsInventory of Frequency of Number of ResponsesPopulation Public Water Systems Monitoring per Year Monitoring Events per YearRange GW* SW/GUDI Total GW SW/GUDI GW SW/GUDI TotalA(from M of"Systems withViolations")B(from N of"Systems withViolations")C = A + B D(from J or K of"Sampling")E(from J or K of"Sampling")F = A * D G = B * E H = F + G25-500 - TC+* 17,274 318 17,592 12 12 207,288 3,816 211,10425-500 - rest 104,435 5,162 109,597 4 12 417,740 61,944 479,684501-1K - TC+* 828 78 906 12 12 9,936 936 10,872501-1K - rest 7,423 1,259 8,682 4 12 29,691 15,110 44,8021,001-2.5K 5,920 1,943 7,863 12 12 71,044 23,312 94,3562,501-3.3K 1,229 639 1,868 12 12 14,744 7,672 22,4163,301-4.1K 807 457 1,264 12 12 9,684 5,484 15,1684,101-10K 2,168 1,612 3,780 12 12 26,020 19,340 45,36010,001-25K 995 1,217 2,212 12 12 11,940 14,604 26,54425,001-50K 376 621 996 12 12 4,506 7,446 11,952Over 50K 229 704 933 12 12 2,748 8,448 11,196Total 141,684 14,009 155,693 805,341 168,112 973,454* GW CWSs with TC+ results sample monthly.Microbial ICR - Total Coliform RuleC - 11July 2008Exhibit C.10 - Total Burden and Cost for TCRSystem TCR TotalsTotal Burden in Hours Total Cost O&M Cost Labor CostMonitoring GW SW Total GW SW Total GW SW Total GW SW TotalRoutine 1,427,661.3 1,884,584.6 3,312,245.9 $79,506,908.47 $95,003,629.89 $174,510,538.37 $35,653,047.60 $37,114,330.57 $72,767,378.17 $43,853,860.87 $57,889,299.32 $101,743,160.19Repeat 53,639.2 4,693.8 58,333.0 $3,303,110.09 $254,193.35 $3,557,303.44 $1,655,575.33 $110,012.50 $1,765,587.83 $1,647,534.75 $144,180.86$1,791,715.61Fecal/E. coli 39,255.2 2,850.5 42,105.7 $2,437,043.81 $157,280.48 $2,594,324.29 $1,231,129.83 $69,718.81 $1,300,848.64 $1,205,913.99 $87,561.69 $1,293,475.68Addtl Routine 50,273.2 1,382.8 51,656.0 $3,124,186.51 $86,050.79 $3,210,237.30 $1,580,048.24 $43,575.78 $1,623,624.02 $1,544,138.27 $42,475.01 $1,586,613.28Total 1,570,828.9 1,893,511.7 3,464,340.6 $88,371,248.88 $95,501,154.51 $183,872,403.40 $40,119,801.00 $37,337,637.66 $77,457,438.66 $48,251,447.88 $58,163,516.88 $106,414,964.76Microbial ICR - Total Coliform RuleC - 12July 2008Exhibit C.11 - Sanitary Surveys - State Burden and CostA. Community Water SystemsInventory GW CWSs GW CWS TotalSize Hrs/ Labor Systems w SSurveys Annual AnnualCategory GW SSurvey Cost Annual % Sys Burden CostA(from "Inventoryof Systems withViolations")B C = B *$42.80D E = A * D F = B * E G = C * E25-500 26,010 12 $513.59 20% 5,202 62,424 $2,671,691.71501-1K 4,511 24 $1,027.18 20% 902 21,648 $926,515.161,001-2.5K 4,655 24 $1,027.18 20% 931 22,344 $956,303.342,501-3.3K 1,115 24 $1,027.18 20% 223 5,352 $229,060.843,301-4.1K 737 36 $1,540.77 20% 147 5,292 $226,492.90Total 37,0287,405 117,060 $5,010,063.95Note: Burden estimates incorporate results of February 2008 consultations with water industry representatives.B. Nontransient Noncommunity SystemsGW NTNCWSs GW NTNC TotalSize Hrs/ Unit Systems w SSurveys Annual AnnualCategory GW SSurvey Cost Annual % Sys Burden CostA(from "Inventoryof Systems withViolations")B C = B *$42.80D E = A * D F = B * E G = C * E25-500 15,539 12 $513.59 20% 3,108 37,296 $1,596,235.65501-1K 1,741 24 $1,027.18 20% 348 8,352 $357,458.181,001-2.5K 692 24 $1,027.18 20% 138 3,312 $141,750.662,501-3.3K 73 24 $1,027.18 20% 15 360 $15,407.683,301-4.1K 42 36 $1,540.77 20% 8 288 $12,326.14Total 18,0873,617 49,608 $2,123,178.30Note: Burden estimates incorporate results of February 2008 consultations with water industry representatives.Sanitary Surveys - Burden and Cost (Continued)C. Transient Noncommunity SystemsGW TNCWSs GW TNC TotalSize Hrs/ Unit Systems w SSurveys Annual AnnualCategory GW SSurvey Cost Annual % Sys Burden CostA(from "Inventoryof Systems withViolations")B C = B *$42.80D E = A * D F = B * E G = C * E25-500 80,160 12 $513.59 20% 16,032 192,384 $8,233,864.19501-1K 1,999 24 $1,027.18 20% 400 9,600 $410,871.471,001-2.5K 573 24 $1,027.18 20% 115 2,760 $118,125.552,501-3.3K 41 24 $1,027.18 20% 8 192 $8,217.433,301-4.1K 28 36 $1,540.77 20% 6 216 $9,244.61Total 82,80116,561 205,152 8,780,323.24$Note: Burden estimates incorporate results of February 2008 consultations with water industry representatives.D. TotalsTotal Total TotalSize Annual Annual AnnualCategory Burden Cost ResponsesH IJ25-500 292,104 $12,501,792 24,342501-1K 39,600 $1,694,845 1,6501,001-2.5K 28,416 $1,216,180 1,1842,501-3.3K 5,904 $252,686 2463,301-4.1K 5,796 $248,064 161Total 371,820 15,913,565.49$ 27,583Microbial ICR - Total Coliform RuleC - 13July 20082004 Burden Task System Size Revised Burden0.33 hr Collection Per Sample 25-10,000 .5 hr0.83 hr Collection Per Sample >10,000 1 hr0.083 hrAnalysis Per Sample >100,000 10 min2004 Burden Task System Size Revised Burden8 hrs Sanitary Survey (Per Survey)* 25-500 12 hrs20 hrs Sanitary Survey (Per Survey)* 501-3,300 24 hrs32 hrs Sanitary Survey (Per Survey)*3,301-4,100 36 hrs*Applies to systems that take <5 samples/mo. Burden of SW systems addressed under Interim Enhanced SurfaceWater Treatment Rule.Sampling BurdenState Burden for Monitoring Related Activities and Sanitary SurveysExhibit C.12 - Total Coliform Rule - Summary of Original and Revised Burden EstimatesMicrobial ICR - Total Coliform RuleC - 14July 2008

# Appendix D

Interim Enhanced Surface Water Treatment

Rule Spreadsheets

# Requirement Annual

Respondents Avg. Annual

Responses Annual

Burden Annual Burden

(Labor) Cost Annual O&M

Cost Annual Capital Cost

Turbidity Monitoring 1,530 3,417,352 3,871,990 $118,936,964 $13,766,446 $83,297,959

Exception Reports and

IFAs 154 154 3,858 $118,494 N/A N/A

Totals 1,530 3,417,506 3,875,847 $119,055,458 $13,766,446 $83,297,959

Requirement Annual

Respondents Avg. Annual

Responses Annual

Burden Annual Burden

(Labor) Cost Annual O&M

Cost Annual Capital Cost

Turbidity Monitoring 57 61,721 416,616 $17,830,813 N/A N/A

Exception Reports and

CPEs 57 141 6,686 $286,174 N/A N/A

Sanitary Surveys 57 4,349 474,153 $20,293,326 N/A N/A

Total 57 66,211 897,456 $38,410,313 N/A N/A 

# Exhibit D.1a - IESWTR PWS Burden and Cost Summary

Exhibit D.1b - IESWTR State Burden and Cost Summary

Microbial ICR - Interim Enhanced Surface Water Treatment Rule D - 1 July 2008

# CWS NTNC TNC CWS NTNC TNC CWS NTNC TNC CWS NTNC TNC

A B C D E F G=A-D H=B-E I=C-F

< 100 1,179 259 1,238 438 129 636 1 0 0 437 129 636

101-500 2,093 236 475 659 148 375 4 0 0 655 148 375

501-1,000 1,167 88 82 365 60 62 3 0 0 362 60 62

1,001-3,300 2,458 68 56 944 33 44 15 0 0 929 33 44

3,301-10K 2,026 20 22 1,005 5 19 14 0 0 991 5 19

10,001-50K 1,828 6 3 962 2 2 14 0 0 948 2 2

50,001-100K 378 1 0 218 0 0 4 0 0 214 0 0

100,001-1M 306 1 1 230 0 1 4 0 0 226 0 1

>1M 16 0 1 15 0 0 1 0 0 14 0 0

Total 11,452 680 1,878 4,837 377 1,139 60 0 0 4,777 377 1,139

Source: SDWIS/FED Data from October 2007. Number of unfiltered systems from ICR done for final LT2ESWTR in 2006.

Note: Source was not specified for some systems. These PWSs were assigned to SW or GW categories based on the ratio of SW to GW systems within a given size

category. 

# Exhibit D.2 - IESWTR System Inventory

Population

Category Filtered Non-Purchased

Surface Water/GWUDI Unfiltered Surface

Water/GWUDI Surface Wate r

and GWUDI Non-Purchased Surface

Water/GWUDI

Microbial ICR - Interim Enhanced Surface Water Treatment Rule D - 2 July 2008

# CWS NTNC TNC CWS NTNC TNC CWS NTNC TNC CWS NTNC TNC CWS NTNC TNC

ABCDEF G=A*D H=B*E I=C*F J K L M=G*J N=H*K O=I*L

< 100 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A 1.00 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A

101-500 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A 1.00 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A

501-1,000 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A 1.04 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A

1,001-3,300 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A 1.04 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A

3,301-10K N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A 1.05 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A

10,001-25K 594 1 1 93.6% 93.6% 93.6% 556 1 1 1.11 1.0 1.0 617 1 1

25,001-50K 354 1 1 93.6% 93.6% 93.6% 331 1 1 1.11 1.0 1.0 367 1 1

50,001-75K 144 0 0 83.2% 83.2% 83.2% 120 0 0 1.11 1.0 1.0 133 0 0

75,001-100K 70 0 0 83.2% 83.2% 83.2% 58 0 0 1.11 1.0 1.0 64 0 0

100,001-500K 201 0 1 90.0% 90.0% 90.0% 181 0 1 1.64 1.0 1.0 297 0 1

500,001-1M 25 0 0 90.0% 90.0% 90.0% 22 0 0 1.64 1.0 1.0 36 0 0

>1M 14 0 0 90.0% 90.0% 90.0% 13 0 0 1.64 1.0 1.0 9 0 0

Total 1,402 2 3 1,281 2 3 1,525 2 3 

# Exhibit D.3 - Systems and Plants Subject to IESWTR Individual Filter Turbidity Monitoring Requirements

(Practicing Conventional or Direct Filtration)

Note: IESWTR individual filter turbidity monitoring requirements apply only to systems serving more than 10,000 people. Percent age of systems using conventional or direct filtration was

not available. Percentage of plants was used as a proxy. Percentage of plants using conventional or direct filtration was assum ed to apply to NTNCWSs and TNCWSs. Sources: Number of plants per system (for CWSs) and percentage of plants using conventional or direct filtration are from 2000 CWSS. 

# Total Plants Subject to

IESWTR Individual Filter

Turbidity Monitoring Plants Per System Population

Category % Using Conventional or

Direct Filtration Total Systems Subject to

IESWTR Individual Filter

Turbidity Monitoring Filtered Non-Purchased

Surface Water/GWUDI

Microbial ICR - Interim Enhanced Surface Water Treatment Rule D - 3 July 2008

# CWS NTNC TNC CWS NTNC TNC Data Collection Data Review Data Reporting Recordkeeping Data Review Develop

Summary

Report

3 collections/day*1

hr/collection*365 3 reviews/day*1

hr/review*365 1 report/month*10

hrs/report*12 5 hrs/month*12 8 hrs/month*12 8 hrs/month*12



# <100 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A

101-500 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A

501-1,000 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A

1,001-3,300 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A

3,301-10K N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A

10,001-25K $30.72 556 1 1 617 1 1 1095 1095 120 60 96 96 1,576,243 $48,417,882

25,001-50K $30.72 331 1 1 367 1 1 1095 1095 120 60 96 96 937,701 $28,803,620

50,001-75K $30.72 120 0 0 133 0 0 1095 1095 120 60 96 96 339,157 $10,417,988

75,001-100K $30.72 58 0 0 64 0 0 1095 1095 120 60 96 96 163,298 $5,016,068

100,001-500K $30.72 181 0 1 297 0 1 1095 1095 120 60 96 96 741,171 $22,766,739

500,001-1M $30.72 22 0 0 36 0 0 1095 1095 120 60 96 96 90,671 $2,785,157

>1M $30.72 13 0 0 9 0 0 1095 1095 120 60 96 96 23,749 $729,511

Total 1,281 2 3 1,525 2 3 3,871,990 $118,936,964

***Total labor cost per year is calculated from the product of the hourly labor rate and the total labor hours/year Number of Conv. & Dir.

Systems (SW and GWUDI)



# **Total labor hours per year is calculated from the number of plants times the sum of the data collection, review, and reportin g hours, plus the number of systems times the sum of data review and summary development hours. Note: Burden estimates take into account the results of the February 2008 consultation with water industry representatives. IES WTR individual filter turbidity monitoring requirements apply only to systems serving more than 10,000 people. 

# Exhibit D.4 - Individual Filter Turbidity Monitoring Burden and Costs - PWSs

Population

Category Hourly

Labor

Rate Total Labor

Hours/Year** Total Labor

Cost/Year*** Number of Conv. & Dir.

Plants (SW and GWUDI) 

# Plant Level Labor Hours/System/Year System Level Labor

Hours/System/Year

Microbial ICR - Interim Enhanced Surface Water Treatment Rule D - 4 July 2008

# CWS NTNC TNC Avg Daily Peak Daily

(cents/kgal) # Systems*Unit Cost*Avg

Daily Flow*1,000*Inflation

Factor*1/100*365 (cents/kgal) # Systems*Unit Cost*Peak Daily

Flow*1,000*Inflation

Factor*1/100*365



# <100 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A

101-500 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A

501-1,000 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A

1,001-3,300 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A

3,301-10K N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A

10,001-25K 556 1 1 2.1 4.8 0.282 $1,536,002 0.968 $12,051,472

25,001-50K 331 1 1 5.0 11.0 0.237 $1,828,450 0.813 $13,799,014

50,001-75K 120 0 0 8.8 18.0 0.239 $1,173,301 0.693 $6,958,806

75,001-100K 58 0 0 13.0 26.0 0.236 $824,070 0.626 $4,371,760

100,001-500K 181 0 1 27.0 51.0 0.241 $5,498,841 0.602 $25,945,200

500,001-1M 22 0 0 120.0 210.0 0.112 $1,389,436 0.576 $12,504,920

>1M 13 0 0 270.0 518.0 0.096 $1,516,345 0.253 $7,666,787

Total 1,281 2 3 $13,766,44 6 $83,297,959

Note: IESWTR individual filter turbidity monitoring requirements apply only to systems serving more than 10,000 people. Source: All cost data from the IESWTR RIA (1998), Appendix C. Updated to 2007$. Capital Unit

Costs for

Continuous

Monitoring Number of Conv. & Dir.

Systems (SW and GWUDI) 

# Exhibit D.5 - Individual Filter Turbidity Monitoring O&M and Capital Costs - PWSs

A nnual O&M Costs for

Continuous

Monitoring Annual Capital Costs for

Continuous Monitoring

(7% Cost of Capital) 

# Population

Category O&M Unit Costs

for Continuous

Monitoring Flows (MGD)



# Microbial ICR - Interim Enhanced Surface Water Treatment Rule D - 5 July 2008

# CWS NTNC TNC Exception

Reports IFAs Exception

Reports IFAs Exception

Reports IFAs

A B CD E F G=(B+C+D)*E H=(B+C+D)*F I J K=(G*I)+(J*H) L=K*A

<100 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A

101-500 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A

501-1,000 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A

1,001-3,300 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A

3,301-10K N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A

10,001-25K $30.72 556 1 1 10% 2% 56 11 20 50 1,676 $51,480

25,001-50K $30.72 331 1 1 10% 2% 33 7 20 50 997 $30,625

50,001-75K $30.72 120 0 0 10% 2% 12 2 20 50 360 $11,072

75,001-100K $30.72 58 0 0 10% 2% 6 1 20 50 174 $5,331

100,001-500K $30.72 181 0 1 10% 2% 18 4 20 50 546 $16,773

500,001-1M $30.72 22 0 0 10% 2% 2 0 20 50 67 $2,052

>1M $30.72 13 0 0 10% 2% 1 0 20 50 38 $1,161

Total 1,281 2 3 129 26 3,858 $118,494

Note: Exception reports are required when systems exceed turbidity levels of 0.5 or 1 NTU in consecutive measurements in indivi dual filters (absent such exceedances,

systems need only report that they have completed monitoring). Individual filter assessments are required when systems exceed t urbidity levels of 1 NTU during 3

consecutive months.

Burden estimates take into account the results of the February 2008 consultation with water industry representatives. Assumptio ns regarding percent of systems

performing exception reports and IFAs from 1998 IESWTR ICR. IESWTR individual filter turbidity monitoring requirements apply on ly to systems serving more than

10,000 people. Labor Hours/Report Number of Conv. & Dir.

Systems (SW and GWUDI) 

# Number of Systems

Performing Each Year 

# Exhibit D.6 - Exceptions Reporting and Individual Filter Assessment Burden and Costs - PWSs

Population

Category Hourly

Labor

Rate Total Labor

Hours/Year Total Labor

Cost/Year 

# Percent of Systems

Performing Each Year

Microbial ICR - Interim Enhanced Surface Water Treatment Rule D - 6 July 2008

# CWS NTNC TNC Compliance

Tracking Analyze/Review Data Make

Determinations (As

Required) Recordkeeping

8 hrs/month/

system*12 9 hrs/month/

system*12 8 hr/month/

system*12 2 hrs/month/

system*12



# <100 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A

101-500 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A

501-1,000 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A

1,001-3,300 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A

3,301-10K N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A

10,001-25K $42.80 556 1 1 96 108 96 24 180,999 $7,746,593

25,001-50K $42.80 331 1 1 96 108 96 24 107,676 $4,608,420

50,001-75K $42.80 120 0 0 96 108 96 24 38,930 $1,666,158

75,001-100K $42.80 58 0 0 96 108 96 24 18,744 $802,224

100,001-500K $42.80 181 0 1 96 108 96 24 58,972 $2,523,932

500,001-1M $42.80 22 0 0 96 108 96 24 7,214 $308,764

>1M $42.80 13 0 0 96 108 96 24 4,082 $174,723

Total 1,281 2 3 416,616 $17,830,813

Note: Burden estimates take into account the results of the February 2008 consultation with water industry representatives (inc luding states).

***Total labor cost per year is calculated from the product of the hourly labor rate and the total labor hours per year **Total labor hours per year are calculated from the number of systems for which states must review data times the sum of the c ompliance tracking, data review, determinations,

and recordkeeping burden the state incurs per system. 

# Exhibit D.7 - Individual Filter Turbidity Monitoring Burden and Costs - States

Population

Category Hourly

Labor

Rate Total Labor

Hours/Year** Total Labor

Cost/Year*** 

# State Level Labor Hours/System/Year Number of Conv. & Dir.

Systems (SW and GWUDI)



# Microbial ICR - Interim Enhanced Surface Water Treatment Rule D - 7 July 2008

# CWS NTNC TNC Exception

Reports CPEs Exception

Reports CPEs Exception

Reports CPEs

A B CD E F G=(B+C+D)*E H=(B+C+D)*F I J K=(G*I)+(J*H) L=K*A

<100 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A

101-500 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A

501-1,000 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A

1,001-3,300 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A

3,301-10K N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A

10,001-25K $42.80 556 1 1 10% 1% 56 6 36 160 2,905 $124,328

25,001-50K $42.80 331 1 1 10% 1% 33 3 36 160 1,728 $73,962

50,001-75K $42.80 120 0 0 10% 1% 12 1 36 160 625 $26,741

75,001-100K $42.80 58 0 0 10% 1% 6 1 36 160 301 $12,875

100,001-500K $42.80 181 0 1 10% 1% 18 2 36 160 946 $40,508

500,001-1M $42.80 22 0 0 10% 1% 2 0 36 160 116 $4,955

>1M $42.80 13 0 0 10% 1% 1 0 36 160 66 $2,804

Total 1,281 2 3 129 13 6,686 $286,174

Source: Percentages of systems for which states must review exception reports and conduct CPEs carried forward from the 1998 IE SWTR ICR.

Note: Exception reports are required when systems exceed turbidity levels of 0.5 or 1 NTU in consecutive measurements in indivi dual filters (absent such exceedances,

systems need only report that they have completed monitoring). Comprehensive performance evaluations are performed by states wh en a system exceeds 2 NTU in two

consecutive measurements in an individual filter in each of two consecutive months.

Burden estimates take into account the results of the February 2008 consultation with water industry representatives (including states). Labor Hours/Activity Number of Conv. & Dir.

Systems (SW and

GWUDI) 

# Number of Systems Requiring

Activity Each Year 

# Exhibit D.8 - Exceptions Reporting and Comprehensive Performance Evaluation Burden and Costs - States

Population

Category Hourly

Labor

Rate Total Labor

Hours/Year Total Labor

Cost/Year 

# Percent of Systems

Requiring Activity Each

Year

Microbial ICR - Interim Enhanced Surface Water Treatment Rule D - 8 July 2008

# CWS NTNC TNC CWS NTNC TNC CWS All NCWSs Filtered Systems Unfiltered

Systems Filtered

Systems Unfiltered

Systems

A B C D EFG H I J=(B*H)+((C+D)*I) K=(E*H)+((F+G)*I ) L M N=L*J+M*K O=N*A

<100 $42.80 1,179 259 1,238 1 0 0 33.3% 20.0% 693 0 16 16 11,088 $474,538

101-500 $42.80 2,093 236 475 4 0 0 33.3% 20.0% 840 1 16 16 13,457 $575,966

501-1,000 $42.80 1,167 88 82 3 0 0 33.3% 20.0% 423 1 28 28 11,874 $508,193

1,001-3,300 $42.80 2,458 68 56 15 0 0 33.3% 20.0% 844 5 28 28 23,775 $1,017,558

3,301-4,400 $42.80 448 4 5 3 0 0 33.3% 20.0% 151 1 40 40 6,087 $260,521

4,401-10K $42.80 1,579 16 17 11 0 0 33.3% 20.0% 533 4 65 40 34,776 $1,488,362

10,001-25K $42.80 1,146 4 2 9 0 0 33.3% 20.0% 383 3 65 40 25,026 $1,071,095

25,001-50K $42.80 682 2 1 5 0 0 33.3% 20.0% 228 2 391 194 89,476 $3,829,474

50,001-75K $42.80 255 1 0 3 0 0 33.3% 20.0% 85 1 705 334 60,356 $2,583,184

75,001-100K $42.80 123 0 0 1 0 0 33.3% 20.0% 41 0 1,034 485 42,620 $1,824,084

100,001-500K $42.80 273 1 1 4 0 0 33.3% 20.0% 91 1 1,364 638 125,207 $5,358,754

500,001-1M $42.80 33 0 0 0 0 0 33.3% 20.0% 11 0 1,689 786 18,966 $811,735

>1M $42.80 16 0 1 1 0 0 33.3% 20.0% 6 0 2,008 1004 11,446 $489,862

Total 11,452 680 1,878 60 0 0 4,329 20 474,153 $20,293,326 Percent of Surveys

Performed Annually Total Surveys Annually

Source: Percentage of systems undergoing surveys annually is based on IESWTR requirements.

Note: All SW/GWUDI systems must undergo surveys (other requirements of the IESWTR are assumed to apply to non-purchased SW/GWUD I systems). Burden estimates take into account the results of the February

2008 consultation with water industry representatives (including states). 

# Exhibit D.9 - Sanitary Surveys - State Burden and Cost s

Population

Category Hourly

Labor

Rate Total Labor

Hours/Year Total Labor

Cost/Year System Level Labor

Hours/Sanitary Survey Number Filtered Systems

(SW and GWUDI) Number of Unfiltered

Systems (SW and

GWUDI)

Microbial ICR - Interim Enhanced Surface Water Treatment Rule D - 9 July 2008

# Individual Filter Turbidity Monitoring Burden - PWSs

2004 Burden Task Revised Estimate

4 hrs Data reporting (Per Report) 10 hrs.

4 hrs Data Review (Per Month) 8 hrs.

2004 Burden Task Revised Estimate

8 hrs Exceptions Reporting 20 hrs.



# Individual Filter Turbidity Monitoring Burden Per System--States

2004 Burden Task Revised Estimate

4 hrs Compliance Tracking (Per Month) 8 hrs

4 hrs Analyze and Review Data (Per Month) 9 hrs

1 hr Make Determination, As Required (Per Month) 8 hrs

2 hrs Recordkeeping (Per month) 2 hrs

2004 Burden Task Revised Estimate

16 hrs Exceptions reporting 36 hrs

250 hrs CPEs 160 hrs Plant Level Burden

System Level Burden 

# Exhibit D.10 - Interim Enhanced Surface Water Treatment Rule -

Summary of Original and Revised Burden Estimates

Exceptions Reporting and Comprehensive Performance Evaluation Burden Per

Report--States Exceptions Reporting and Individual Filter Assessment Burden Per Report--

PWSs

M icrobial ICR - Interim Enhanced

Surface Water Treatment Rule D - 10 July 2008

# Appendix E

Long Term 1 Enhanced Surface Water

Treatment Rule Spreadsheets

# Exhibit E1

LT1ESWTR Burden and Cost Summary by Activity

Exhibit E1a

Requirement Annual

Respondents Avg. Annual

Responses Annual

Burden Annual Burden

(Labor) Cost Annual O&M

Cost Annual Capital Cos t

Turbidity Monitoring 3,293 3,293 150,961 $4,637,096 $3,270,462 $2,629,442

Turbidity Exceptions

Reporting 593 593 4,742 $145,673 N/A N/A

Individual Filter

Assessments 132 132 6,587 $202,323 N/A N/A

Total 3,293 4,018 162,290 $4,985,092 $3,270,462 $2,629,442



# Exhibit E1b

Requirement Annual

Respondents Avg. Annual

Responses Annual

Burden Annual Burden

(Labor) Cost Annual O&M

Cost Annual Capital Cos t

Turbidity Monitoring 57 3,293 118,552 $5,073,932 N/A N/A

Turbidity Exceptions

Reporting 57 725 23,179 $992,062 N/A N/A

Total 57 4,018 141,732 $6,065,993 N/A N/A 

# LT1ESWTR PWS Burden and Cost Summary

LT1ESWTR State Burden and Cost Summary

Microbial ICR - LT1ESWTR E - 1 July 2008

# Exhibit E2

Summary of the LT1 Burden, Respondents, Responses, and

Costs for the ICR Approval Period by Year and Annual Averages

PWSs

Source

(Exhibit)* Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 A nnual Averag e Three Year Total

Burden (hours) F5.4 162,290 162,290 162,290 162,290 486,869

Respondents (number)** F7 3,293 3,293 3,293 3,293 3,293

Responses (number) F8 4,018 4,018 4,018 4,018 12,053

Costs (labor) F3.4 $4,985,092 $4,985,092 $4,985,092 $4,985,092 $14,955,276

Costs (Turbidimeter Capital) F3.4 $2,629,442 $2,629,442 $2,629,442 $2,629,442 $7,888,325

Costs (Turbidimeter O&M) F3.4 $3,270,462 $3,270,462 $3,270,462 $3,270,462 $9,811,387

* The distribution over time is based upon the Compliance Schedule in Exhibit E17.

** Some respondents will respond to the rule over the course of more than one year. Therefore the three year total is not the s um

of the three years.



# States

Source

(Exhibit)* Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 A nnual Averag e Three Year Total

Burden (hours) E6 141,732 141,732 141,732 141,732 425,195

Respondents (number)** E7 57 57 57 57 57

Responses (number) E8 4,018 4,018 4,018 4,018 12,053

Costs E4 $6,065,993 $6,065,993 $6,065,993 $6,065,993 $18,197,979

* The distribution over time is based upon the Compliance Schedule in Exhibit E17.

** Some respondents will respond to the rule in more than one year. Therefore the three year total is not the sum

of the three years.

Annual Average Three Year Total

Total Burden (hours) 304,021 912,064

Total Respondents (number) 3,350 3,350

Total Cost for All Activitie s $16,950,989 $50,852,967

Microbial ICR - LT1ESWTR E - 2 July 2008

# Exhibit E3.1

Costs for the ICR Approval Period Year by Year

for Systems Serving Fewer than 1,000 People

PWSs

Source

(Exhibit)* Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Annual Average

Annual Activities

Turbidity Monitoring E10.1a $2,006,342 $2,006,342 $2,006,342 $2,006,342

Turbidity Exceptions Reporting E10.1b $69,898 $69,898 $69,898 $69,898

Individual Filter Assessments E10.1b $97,080 $97,080 $97,080 $97,080

Annual Activity Yearly Labor Total $2,173,319 $2,173,319 $2,173,319 $2,173,319

Yearly Labor Total $2,173,319 $2,173,319 $2,173,319 $2,173,319

* The distribution over time is based upon the Compliance Schedule in Exhibit E17.



# PWS Capital and O&M

Source

(Exhibit)** Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Annual Average

Annual

Turbidimeter Capital Cost* E10.1c $815,222 $815,222 $815,222 $815,222

Turbidimeter Annual O&M * E10.1c $1,569,430 $1,569,430 $1,569,430 $1,569,430

Yearly Total $2,384,651 $2,384,651 $2,384,651 $2,384,651

* Used a weighted value based upon the three size categories of 25-100, 101-500, and 501-1,000.

** The distribution over time is based upon the Compliance Schedule in Exhibit E17.

Microbial ICR - LT1ESWTR E - 3 July 2008

# Exhibit E3.2

Costs for the ICR Approval Period Year by Year

for Systems Serving between 1,000 and 3,300 People

PWSs

Source

(Exhibit)* Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Annual Average

Annual Activitie s

Turbidity Monitoring E10.2a $1,251,682 $1,251,682 $1,251,682 $1,251,682

Turbidity Exceptions Reporting E10.2b $36,051 $36,051 $36,051 $36,051

Individual Filter Assessments E10.2b $50,070 $50,070 $50,070 $50,070

Annual Activity Yearly Labor Total $1,337,803 $1,337,803 $1,337,803 $1,337,803

Yearly Labor Total $1,337,80 3 $1,337,80 3 $1,337,80 3 $1,337,80 3

* The distribution over time is based upon the Compliance Schedule in Exhibit E17.



# PWS Capital and O&M

Source

(Exhibit)* Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Annual Average

Annual

Turbidimeter Capital Cost E10.2c $710,911 $710,911 $710,911 $710,911

Turbidimeter Annual O&M E10.2c $809,331 $809,331 $809,331 $809,331

Yearly Total $1,520,243 $1,520,243 $1,520,243 $1,520,243

* The distribution over time is based upon the Compliance Schedule in Exhibit E17.

Microbial ICR - LT1ESWTR E - 4 July 2008

# Exhibit E3.3

Costs for the ICR Approval Period Year by Year

for Systems Serving between 3,300 and 9,999 People

PWSs

Source

(Exhibit)* Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 A nnual

Average

Annual Activities

Turbidity Monitoring E10.3a $1,379,073 $1,379,073 $1,379,073 $1,379,073

Turbidity Exceptions Reporting E10.3b $39,724 $39,724 $39,724 $39,724

Individual Filter Assessments E10.3b $55,173 $55,173 $55,173 $55,173

Annual Activity Yearly Labor Tota l $1,473,96 9 $1,473,96 9 $1,473,96 9 $1,473,96 9

Y early Labor Total $1,473,96 9 $1,473,96 9 $1,473,96 9 $1,473,96 9

* The distribution over time is based upon the Compliance Schedule in Exhibit E17.



# PWS Capital and O&M

Source

(Exhibit)* Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 A nnual

Average

Annual

Turbidimeter Capital Cost E10.3c $1,103,309 $1,103,309 $1,103,309 $1,103,309

Turbidimeter Annual O&M E10.3c $891,701 $891,701 $891,701 $891,701

Y early Total $1,995,010 $1,995,010 $1,995,010 $1,995,010

*The distribution over time is based upon the Compliance Schedule in Exhibit E17.

Microbial ICR - LT1ESWTR E - 5 July 2008

# Exhibit E3.4

Costs for the ICR Approval Period Year by Year

for All System Sizes

PWSs

Source

(Exhibit)* Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Annual Average 3 Year Total

Annual Activities

Turbidity Monitoring E3.1-E3.3 $4,637,096 $4,637,096 $4,637,096 $4,637,096 $13,911,289

Turbidity Exceptions Reporting E3.1-E3.3 $145,673 $145,673 $145,673 $145,673 $437,018

Individual Filter Assessments E3.1-E3.3 $202,323 $202,323 $202,323 $202,323 $606,969

Annual Activity Yearly Total $4,985,092 $4,985,092 $4,985,092 $4,985,092 $14,955,276

Yearly Labor Total $4,985,092 $4,985,092 $4,985,092 $4,985,092 $14,955,276

* The distribution over time is based upon the Compliance Schedule in Exhibit E17.



# PWS C ap it a l an d O&M

Source

(Exhibit)* Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Annual Average 3 Year Total

Annual

Turbidimeter Capital Cost E3.1-E3.3 $2,629,442 $2,629,442 $2,629,442 $2,629,442 $7,888,325

Turbidimeter Annual O&M E3.1-E3.3 $3,270,462 $3,270,462 $3,270,462 $3,270,462 $9,811,387

Yearly Total $5,899,904 $5,899,904 $5,899,904 $5,899,904 $17,699,711

*The distribution over time is based upon the Compliance Schedule in Exhibit E17.

Microbial ICR - LT1ESWTR E - 6 July 2008

# Exhibit E4

Costs for the ICR Approval Period Year by Year for States

Summary Cost Estimates for States and Systems

States

Source

(Exhibit)* Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Annual Average 3 Year Total

Annual Activities

Turbidity Monitoring E12a $5,073,932 $5,073,932 $5,073,932 $5,073,932 $15,221,795

Turbidity Exceptions Reporting E12b $992,062 $992,062 $992,062 $992,062 $2,976,185

Annual Activity Yearly Total $6,065,993 $6,065,993 $6,065,993 $6,065,993 $18,197,979

Yearly Total $6,065,993 $6,065,993 $6,065,993 $6,065,993 $18,197,979

* The distribution over time is based upon the Compliance Schedule in Exhibit E17.



# Summary of Total Year by Year Costs for PWSs and States*

Source

(Exhibit)** Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Annual Average 3 Year Total

Start-Up Summary

PWSs Serving < 1,000 People E3.1 $2,173,319 $2,173,319 $2,173,319 $2,173,319 $6,519,958

PWSs Serving 1,000 - 3,300 People E3.2 $1,337,803 $1,337,803 $1,337,803 $1,337,803 $4,013,410

PWSs Serving 3,300 - 9,999 People E3.3 $1,473,969 $1,473,969 $1,473,969 $1,473,969 $4,421,908

PWS Total $4,985,092 $4,985,092 $4,985,092 $4,985,092 $14,955,276

States and Territories E4 $6,065,993 $6,065,993 $6,065,993 $6,065,993 $18,197,979

Yearly Total $11,051,085 $11,051,085 $11,051,085 $11,051,085 $33,153,255

* Include Capital and O&M costs.

**The distribution over time is based upon the Compliance Schedule in Exhibit E17.

Microbial ICR - LT1ESWTR E - 7 July 2008

# Exhibit E5.1

Burden for the ICR Approval Period Year by Year by Activity

for Systems Serving Fewer than 1,000 People

PWSs Labo r

Source

(Exhibit)* Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Annual

Average

Annual Activitie s

Turbidity Monitoring E10.1a 65,316 65,316 65,316 65,316

Turbidity Exceptions Reporting E10.1b 2,276 2,276 2,276 2,276

Individual Filter Assessment E10.1b 3,160 3,160 3,160 3,160

Annual Activity Yearly Labor Tota l 70,752 70,752 70,752 70,752

Yearly Labor Total 70,752 70,752 70,752 70,752

* The distribution over time is based upon the Compliance Schedule in Exhibit E17.

Microbial ICR - LT1ESWTR E - 8 July 2008

# Exhibit E5.2

Burden for the ICR Approval Period Year by Year by Activity

for Systems Serving between 1,000 and 3,300 People

PWSs

Source

(Exhibit)* Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Annual

Average

Annual Activitie s

Turbidity Monitoring E10.2a 40,748 40,748 40,748 40,748

Turbidity Exceptions Reporting E10.2b 1,174 1,174 1,174 1,174

Individual Filter Assessment E10.2b 1,630 1,630 1,630 1,630

Annual Activity Yearly Labor Tota l 43,552 43,552 43,552 43,552

Y early Labor Total 43,552 43,552 43,552 43,552

* The distribution over time is based upon the Compliance Schedule in Exhibit E17.

Microbial ICR - LT1ESWTR E - 9 July 2008

# Exhibit E5.3

Burden for the ICR Approval Period Year by Year by Activity

for Systems Serving between 3,300 and 9,999 People

PWSs

Source

(Exhibit)* Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Annual

Average

Annual Activitie s

Turbidity Monitoring E10.3a 44,896 44,896 44,896 44,896

Turbidity Exceptions Reporting E10.3b 1,293 1,293 1,293 1,293

Individual Filter Assessment E10.3b 1,796 1,796 1,796 1,796

Annual Activity Yearly Labor Total 47,985 47,985 47,985 47,985

Yearly Total 47,985 47,985 47,985 47,985

* The distribution over time is based upon the Compliance Schedule in Exhibit E17.

Microbial ICR - LT1ESWTR E - 10 July 2008

# Exhibit E5.4

Burden for the ICR Approval Period Year by Year by Activity

for All System Sizes

PWSs

Source

(Exhibit)* Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Annual

Average 3 Year Total

Annual Activitie s

Turbidity Monitoring E5.1-E5.3 150,961 150,961 150,961 150,961 452,882

Turbidity Exceptions Reporting E5.1-E5.3 4,742 4,742 4,742 4,742 14,227

Individual Filter Monitoring E5.1-E5.3 6,587 6,587 6,587 6,587 19,760

Annual Activity Yearly Tota 162,290 162,290 162,290 162,290 486,869

Yearly Tota l 162,290 162,290 162,290 162,290 486,869

* The distribution over time is based upon the Compliance Schedule in Exhibit E17.

Microbial ICR - LT1ESWTR E - 11 July 2008

# Exhibit E6

Burden for the ICR Approval Period Year by Year by Activity for States

Summary Burden for States and Systems

States

Source

(Exhibit)* Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Annual

Average 3 Year Total

Start-Up Activitie s

Profiling & Benchmark Dev./Compl. Tracking** E11 0000 0

Start-Up Activity Yearly Tota l 0000 0

Annual Activitie s

Turbidity Monitoring E12a 118,552 118,552 118,552 118,552 355,657

Turbidity Exceptions Reporting E12b 23,179 23,179 23,179 23,179 69,538

Annual Activity Yearly Tota 141,732 141,732 141,732 141,732 425,195

Yearly Tota l 141,732 141,732 141,732 141,732 425,195

* The distribution over time is based upon the Compliance Schedule in Exhibit E17.

** Includes tracking for applicability monitoring or profiling, as well as data review, determinations, and consultations with PWSs.



# Summary of Total Year by Year Burden for PWSs and State s

Source

(Exhibit)* Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Annual

Average 3 Year Total

Start-Up Summar y

PWSs Serving < 1,000 People E5.1 70,752 70,752 70,752 70,752 212,257

PWSs Serving 1,000 - 3,300 People E5.2 43,552 43,552 43,552 43,552 130,656

PWSs Serving 3,300 - 9,999 People E5.3 47,985 47,985 47,985 47,985 143,955

PWS Total 162,290 162,290 162,290 162,290 486,869

States and Territories E6 141,732 141,732 141,732 141,732 425,195

Yearly Tota l 304,021 304,021 304,021 304,021 912,064

* The distribution over time is based upon the Compliance Schedule in Exhibit E17.

Microbial ICR - LT1ESWTR E - 12 July 2008

# Exhibit E7

Respondents for the ICR Approval Period Year by Year by Activity

PWSs [1]

Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Annual

Average

Respondents 3,293 3,293 3,293 3,293

Includes systems performing:

Annual Turbidity Monitoring 3,293 3,293 3,293 3,293

Turbidity Exceptions Reporting 593 593 593 593

Individual Filter Assesmen t 132 132 132 132



# States [2]

Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Annual

Average

Respondents 57 57 57 57

Includes States performing:

Annual Turbidity Monitoring 57 57 57 57

Turbidity Exceptions Reporting 57 57 57 57

Comprehensive Performance Evaluation 57 57 57 57



# Sum for PWSs and States

Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Annual

Average

PWSs 3,293 3,293 3,293 3,293

States and Territories 57 57 57 57

Y early Total 3,350 3,350 3,350 3,350

[2] Each State is one respondent. [1] Each PWS is one respondent. One respondent may be involved in more than one activity; however, in

order to avoid double-counting, the maximum number of respondents expected to be involved in the rule

activities annually is assumed to be the number of respondents for that year. * Includes tracking for applicability monitoring or profiling, as well as data review, determinations, and

consultations with PWSs.

Microbial ICR - LT1ESWTR E - 13 July 2008

# Exhibit E8

Responses for the ICR Approval Period Year by Year by Activity

PWSs [1]

Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Annual

Average

Annual Activitie s

Turbidity Monitoring 3,293 3,293 3,293 3,293

Turbidity Exceptions Reporting 593 593 593 593

Individual Filter Assessments 132 132 132 132

Yearly Total 4,018 4,018 4,018 4,018



# States [2]

Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Annual

Average

Annual Activitie s

Turbidity Monitoring 3,293 3,293 3,293 3,293

Turbidity Exceptions Reporting 593 593 593 593

Comprehensive Performance Evaluation 132 132 132 132

Yearly Total 4,018 4,018 4,018 4,018



# Sum for PWSs and States

Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Annual

Average

PWSs 4,018 4,018 4,018 4,018

States and Territories 4,018 4,018 4,018 4,018

Yearly Total 8,035 8,035 8,035 8,035

* The distribution over time is based upon the Compliance Schedule in Exhibit E17.

[1] Each PWS is one respondent. Each activity detailed in Exhibits E2-E5 is a response.

[2] Each State is one respondent. Each activity detailed in Exhibits E2-E5 is a response.

Microbial ICR - LT1ESWTR E - 14 July 2008

# Exhibit E9

PWS Cost and Burden Estimates for Start-up Activities

for Systems Serving Fewer than 1,000 People

Disinfection Benchmark Labor for Systems Serving 500 or Less (Filtered & Unfiltered Systems )

Systems

(Respondents) Hours per

Task Cost per

Task Total Burden

(hrs.) Total Initial

Cost ($)

Activit y A B C A *B A*C

Submit Profiling Notification to State 0 1.0 $31 - $0

Data Entry and Spreadsheet Development 0 8.7 $266 - $0

Data Review 0 4.3 $133 - $0

Generate Report for State and In-House Review 0 40.0 $1,229 - $0

Meet and Review with State 0 8.0 $246 - $0

Supplemental Viral Profile and Benchmar k 0 53.0 $1,628 - $0

Totals 115.0 $3,532 - $0

Total Cost

($)

Total Costs for All Start-Up Activitie s $0

Notes: Baseline number systems performing rule activities from all filtered systems. Percentages requiring report and viral

benchmark from original LT1ESTWTR analysis.

Microbial ICR - LT1ESWTR E - 15 July 2008

# Exhibit E10.1

PWS Cost and Burden Estimates for Annual Activities

by Systems Serving Fewer than 1,000 People

Exhibit E10.1a

Monitoring Requirements for Plants (Monitoring at Individual Filters)

Systems

(Respondents)* Frequency per

Year Hours per

Task** Cost per

Task Burden (hrs.) Cost ($)

Activit y A B C D A*B*C A *B*D

Data Analysis 1,580 52 0.17 $5 13,695 $420,685

Data Review 1,580 52 0.17 $5 13,695 $420,685

Record Keeping 1,580 12 2.00 $61 37,926 $1,164,972

$72 65,316 $2,006,342



# Exhibit E10.1b

Turbidity Exceptions Reporting for Systems

Systems

(Respondents) Frequency per

Year Hours per

Task** Cost per

Task Burden (hrs.) Cost ($)

Activit y A B C D A*B*C A *B*D

Annual Reporting Exceptions 284 1 8.0 $246 2,276 $69,898

A nnual IFA 63 1 50.0 $1,536 3,160 $97,080

Total $1,782 5,436 $166,978

Burden (hrs.) Cost

Total for All PWS Labor Burdens and Cost s 70,752 $2,173,319



# Exhibit E10.1c

Turbidimeter Installation, Operation, and Maintenance

Activitie s Systems Cost per

Task Cost Annualized

Cost

Turbidimeter Installation*** 1,580 $3,311 $5,231,432 $815,222

Operation and Maintenance 1,580 $993 $1,569,430 $1,569,430

Total $6,800,862 $2,384,651

Burden (hrs.) Cost

Total for All PWS Activitie s 70,752 $4,557,971

***The capitalization factor used for turbidimeter installation annualizes costs over 7 years using a 3% cost-of-capital as the discount rate. **Burden estimates incorporate the results of EPA's February 2008 consultation with water industry representatives. 

# *Systems performing monitoring include direct and conventional filtration CWSs and NTNCWSs from system baseline. Percentage

performing exceptions reporting and IFA from LT1ESWTR EA.

Microbial ICR - LT1ESWTR E - 16 July 2008

# Exhibit E10.2

PWS Cost and Burden Estimates for Annual Activities

by Systems Serving 1,000 - 3,300 People

Exhibit E10.2a

Monitoring Requirements for Plants (Monitoring at Individual Filters )

Systems

(Respondents)* Frequency

per Year Hours per

Task** Cost per

Task Burden (hrs.) Cost ($)

Activit y A B C D A*B* C A *B* D

Data Analysis 815 52 0.250 $8 10,595 $325,437

Data Review 815 52 0.250 $8 10,595 $325,437

Record Keeping 815 12 2.0 $61 19,559 $600,807

Totals $77 40,748 $1,251,682



# Exhibit E10.2b

Turbidity Exceptions Reporting for System s

Systems

(Respondents) Frequency

per Year Hours per

Task Cost per

Task Burden (hrs.) Cost ($)

Activit y A B C D A*B* C A *B* D

Annual Reporting Exceptions 147 1 8.0 $246 1,174 $36,051

Annual IFA 33 1 50.0 $1,536 1,630 $50,070

Total $1,782 2,804 $86,121

Burden (hrs.) Cost ($)

Total for All PWS Activitie s 43,552 $1,337,803



# Exhibit E10.2c

Turbidimeter Installation, Operation, and Maintenanc e

Activity Systems Cost per

Task Cost Annualized

Cost

Turbidimeter Installation*** 815 $5,598 $4,562,055 $710,911

Operation and Maintenance 815 $993 $809,331 $809,331

Total $5,371,386 $1,520,243

Burden (hrs.) Cost

Total for All PWS Activitie s 43,552 $2,858,046

*** The capitalization factor used for turbidimeter installation annualizes costs over 7 years using a 3% cost-of-capital as th e discount rate. *Systems performing monitoring include direct and conventional filtration CWSs and NTNCWSs from system baseline. Percentage

performing exceptions reporting and IFA from LT1ESWTR EA.

**Burden estimates incorporate results of EPA's February 2008 consultation with water industry representatives.

Microbial ICR - LT1ESWTR E - 17 July 2008

# Exhibit E10.3

PWS Cost and Burden Estimates for Annual Activities

by Systems Serving 3,300 - 9,999 People

Exhibit E10.3a

Monitoring Requirements for Plants (Monitoring at Individual Filters)

Systems

(Respondents)* Frequency

per Year Hours per

Task** Cost per

Task Burden (hrs.) Cost ($)

Activit y A B C D A*B*C A *B*D

Data Analysis 898 52 0.250 $8 11,673 $358,559

Data Review 898 52 0.250 $8 11,673 $358,559

Record Keeping 898 12 2.0 $61 21,550 $661,955

Totals $77 44,896 $1,379,07 3



# Exhibit E10.3b

Turbidity Exceptions Reporting for Systems

Systems

(Respondents) Frequency

per Year Hours per

Task** Cost per

Task Burden (hrs.) Cost ($)

Activit y A B C D A*B*C A *B*D

Annual Reporting Exceptions 162 1 8.0 $246 1293 $39,724

Annual IFA 36 1 50.0 $1,536 1796 $55,173

Total $1,782 3,089 $94,897

Burden (hrs.) Cost

Total Labor Burdens and Cost s 47,985 $1,473,96 9



# Exhibit E10.3c

Turbidimeter Installation, Operation, and Maintenance

Activity Systems Cost per

Task Cost Annualized

Cost

Turbidimeter Installation*** 898 $7,885 $7,080,142 $1,103,309

Operation and Maintenance 898 $993 $891,701 $891,701

Total $7,971,84 3 $1,995,010

Burden (hrs.) Cost

Total for All PWS Activitie s 47,985 $3,468,97 9

*** The capitalization factor used for turbidimeter installation annualizes costs over 7 years using a 3% cost-of-capital as th e discount

rate. *Systems performing monitoring include direct and convention CWS and NTNCWS from system baseline. Percentage performing

exceptions reporting and IFA from LT1ESWTR EA.

** Burden estimates incorporate the results of EPA's February 2008 consultation with water industry representatives.

Microbial ICR - LT1ESWTR E - 18 July 2008

# Exhibit E11

State Cost and Burden Estimates for Start-up Activities by Activity

Profiling & Benchmark Dev./Compl. Tracking Labor

Responses Hours per

Task Cost per

Task Total Burden

(hrs.) Total Initial

Cost ($)

Activit y A B C A* B A * C

Compliance Tracking* - 4.0 $171 - $0

Analyze and Review Profiling Data - 8.0 $342 - $0

Make Determinations - 8.0 $342 - $0

Meet and Review with PWSs - 16.0 $685 - $0

Review Viral Benchmark - 16.0 $685 - $0

Recordkeeping - 4.0 $171 - $0

Total 56.0 2,397

- $0

Total Burden

(hrs.) Total Cost

($)

Total for All Start-Up Activitie s

- $0

* Includes tracking for applicability monitoring or profiling, as well as data review, determinations, and consultations

with PWSs. Profiling and benchmarking were completed during previous ICR periods.

Microbial ICR - LT1ESWTR E - 19 July 2008

# Exhibit E12

State Cost and Burden Estimates for Annual Activities

Exhibit E12a

Turbidity Monitoring

Responses Frequency

per Year Hours per Task Cost per Task Burden (hrs.) Cost ($)

Activit y A B C D A*B*C A *B*D

Compliance Tracking 3,293 12 1.0 $43 39,517 $1,691,311

Recordkeeping 3,293 12 2.0 $86 79,035 $3,382,621

Total 118,552 $5,073,932



# Exhibit E12b

Turbidity Exceptions Reporting

Responses Frequency

per Year Hours per Task Cost per Task Burden (hrs.) Cost ($)

Activit y A B C D A*B*C A *B*D

Annual Exceptions Reports 593 1 3.5 $150 2,075 $88,799

Annual CPE (serving 1,000 or less) 31 1 400.0 $17,120 12,368 $529,359

A nnual CPE (serving 1,000 - 9,999) 35 1 250.0 $10,700 8,736 $373,903

Total 23,179 $992,062

Number of systems requiring CPE calculated using percentage from LT1ESTWR 2004 ICR.



# Burden estimates incorporate the results of EPA's February 2008 consultation with water industry representatives (including sta tes).

Microbial ICR - LT1ESWTR E - 20 July 2008

# Exhibit E13

Summary of Start-up and Annual Costs

Annual Activitie s

Source

Exhibit Total Annual

Cost

PWS Cost Estimates for Annual Activities

Turbidity Monitoring E3.4 $4,637,096

Turbidity Exceptions Reporting and IFAs E3.4 $347,996

Turbidimeter Capital Cost* E3.4 $2,629,442

Turbidimeter O&M Cost E3.4 $3,270,462

Subtotal $10,884,996

State Cost Estimates for Annual Activities

Turbidity Monitoring E4 $5,073,932

Turbidity Exceptions Reporting and CPEs E4 $992,062

Subtotal $6,065,993

Total Cost Estimates for Annual Activities $16,950,989

*Annualization of turbidimeter costs: 3% cost-of-capital, annualized over 7 years.



# Microbial ICR - LT1ESWTR E - 21 July 2008

# Exhibit E14

Occupational Cost and Burden per Start-up Activity

Activity * Hours** Rate/H r Cost

States

Profiling and Benchmark Dev./Compl. Tracking 56.0 $42.80 $2,397

* The activities listed in the first column correspond to Exhibit E11.

** Each occupation's hourly burdens are the sum of the hours devoted to each of the line items listed

in Exhibit E11. Total Burden

Microbial ICR - LT1ESWTR E - 22 July 2008

# Exhibit E15

Occupational Cost and Burden per Activity per Year

Activity * Hours** Rate/H r Cost***

PWSs Serving 0 -500

Turbidity Monitoring 41.3 $30.72 $1,270

Exception Reporting 8.0 $30.72 $246

Individual Filter Assessment 50.0 $30.72 $1,536

PWSs Serving 500-1,000

Turbidity Monitoring 41.3 $30.72 $1,270

Exception Reporting 8.0 $30.72 $246

Individual Filter Assessment 50.0 $30.72 $1,536

PWSs Serving 1,000-3,300

Turbidity Monitoring 50.0 $30.72 $1,536

Exception Reporting 8.0 $30.72 $246

Individual Filter Assessment 50.0 $30.72 $1,536

PWSs Serving 3,300-9,999

Turbidity Monitoring 50.0 $30.72 $1,536

Exception Reporting 8.0 $30.72 $246

Individual Filter Assessment 50.0 $30.72 $1,536

States

Turbidity Monitoring State 36.0 $42.80 $1,541

Exceptions Reporting  403.5 $42.80 $17,269

** * All labor rates include a 1.6 load factor. ** Each occupation's hourly burdens are the sum of the hours devoted to each

of the line items listed in tables a-c in Exhibits E10.1, E10.2, and E10.3,

multiplied by the frequency of the activity. Total Burden

* The activities listed in the first column correspond to tables a-c in Exhibits

E10.1, E10.2, and E10.3.

****Exceptions reporting for states includes CPEs, which are assumed to take

400 hours for a system serving < 1000 and 250 hours for a system serving

1,000-9,999.

Microbial ICR - LT1ESWTR E - 23 July 2008

# Exhibit E16

LT1 Universe of Respondents Performing

Information Collection and Record Keeping Activities

S y stem T y pes

Community 2,479 2,479

Transient Non-Community 596 596

Non-Transient Non-Community 219 219

Total 3,293 3,293 Three Year

Total Turbidity

Monitoring

Source: SDWIS/FED Data from October 2007.

Microbial ICR - LT1ESWTR E - 24 July 2008

# Exhibit E17

Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Year 4 Year 5 Year 6 Year 7 Year 8 Year 9 Year 10 Year 11 Year 12 Year 13 Year 14 Year 15

Start date: Jan. 2002-

Dec. 2002 Jan. 2003-

Dec. 2003 Jan. 2004-

Dec. 2004 Jan. 2005-

Dec. 2005 Jan. 2006-

Dec. 2006 Jan. 2007-

Dec. 2007 Jan. 2008-

Dec. 2008 Jan. 2009-

Dec. 2009 Jan. 2010-

Dec. 2010 Jan. 2011-

Dec. 2011 Jan. 2012-

Dec. 2012 Jan. 2013-

Dec. 2013 Jan. 2014-

Dec. 2014 Jan. 2015-

Dec. 2015 Jan. 2016-

Dec. 2016

Activity

Turbidity Monitoring Start-up - Systems 17% 33% 50% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0%

Turbidity Monitoring Annual - Systems 0% 0% 0% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100%

Turbidity Monitoring Start-up - States 17% 33% 50% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0%

Turbidity Monitoring Annual - States 0% 0% 0% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100%

Turbidity Monitoring Capital 0% 20% 80% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 20% 80% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0%

Turbidity Monitoring O&M 0% 20% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100%

Benchmarking Start-up - Systems <=500 0% 100% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0%

Benchmarking Start-up - Systems <=501-9,999 0% 100% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0%

Benchmarking Start-up - States 70% 30% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0%

Disinifection Profiling - Systems <=500 0% 0% 100% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0%

Disinifection Profiling - Systems 501-9,999 0% 50% 50% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0%

Disinfection Profiling - States 0% 0% 60% 40% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0%

Benchmarking - Systems <=500 0% 0% 0% 100% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0%

Benchmarking - Systems 501-9,999 0% 0% 100% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0%

Benchmarking State - State 0% 0% 60% 40% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0%

Covered Finished Water* 5% 5% 5% 5% 5% 5% 5% 5% 5% 5% 5% 5% 5% 5% 5%

* This rule activity is not associated with information collection or recordkeeping. 

# LT1 Activity Schedule

Microbial ICR - LT1ESWTR E - 25 July 2008

# Exhibit E18

System Baseline

CWS NTNC TNC CWS NTNC TNC CWS NTNC TNC CWS NTNC TNC CWS NTNC TNC

< 100 1,179 259 1,238 438 129 636 1 0 0 437 129 636 47.41 207 61 302

101-500 2,093 236 475 659 148 375 4 0 0 655 148 375 49.99 328 74 187

501-1,000 1,167 88 82 365 60 62 3 0 0 362 60 62 87.01 315 52 54

1,001-3,300 2,458 68 56 944 33 44 15 0 0 929 33 44 80.98 753 27 36

3,301-10K 2,026 20 22 1,005 5 19 14 0 0 991 5 19 88.43 877 4 17

Note: Source was not specified for some systems. These PWSs were assigned to SW or GW categories based on the ratio of SW to GW systems within a given size category.

Percent of plants that use conventional or direct filtration from 2000 CWSS survey

CWS NTNC TNC Total

< 1,000 850 187 543 1,580

1,001 - 3,300 753 27 36 815

3,301 - 10,000 877 4 17 898

Total 2,479 219 596 3,293 Filtered Non-Purchased

Surface Water/GWUDI

Percent Conventional

or Direct Filtration Conventional or Direct

Surface Water/GWUDI

Systems

Conventional or Direct Source: SDWIS/FED Data from October 2007. Number of unfiltered systems from ICR done for final LT2ESWTR in 2006.

Number of unfiltered systems from the ICR developed for the final LT2ESWTR in 2006). 

# Population Category Surface Water

and GWUDI Non-Purchased Surface

Water/GWUDI Unfiltered Surface

Water/GWUDI

Microbial ICR - LT1ESWTR E - 26 July 2008

# Turbidity Exceptions Reporting Burden Per System

2004 Burden Task Revised Burden

1 hr Annual Reporting Exceptions 8 hrs

10 hrs A nnual IF A 50 hrs

2004 Burden Task Revised Burden

60 hrs Annual CPE (System Size 1,000-9,999) 250 hrs

120 hrs A nnual CPE (System Size ≤ 1,000) 400 hrs 

# State Burden Estimates for Annual Activities

Turbidity Exceptions Reporting 

# Exhibit E19

Long Term 1 Enhanced Surface Water Treatment Rule -

Summary of Original and Revised Burden Estimates

Microbial ICR - LT1ESWTR E - 27 July 2008

# Appendix F

Long Term 2 Enhanced Surface Water

Treatment Rule SpreadsheetsYear 4 Year 5 Year 6Source October-08 October-09 October-10 Annual(Exhibit) September-09 September-10 September-11 Total AveragePWSsBurden (hours)F-A.2 125,02436,61237,583199,21866,406Respondents (number)F-A.3 5,9561,7361,7365,9563,142Responses (number)F-A.4 137,21757,00657,045251,26883,756Costs (dollars)F-A.5 18,050,858$ 15,989,594$ 16,024,927$ 50,065,379$ 16,688,460$Labor3,916,716$ 1,141,596$ 1,176,929$ 6,235,241$ 2,078,414$O&M14,134,142$ 14,847,998$ 14,847,998$ 43,830,139$ 14,610,046$Capital-$ -$ -$ -$ -$Burden per respondent33.5Cost per respondent8,407$StatesBurden (hours)F-A.2 51,01539,94940,570131,53343,844Respondents (number)F-A.3 5757575757Responses (number)F-A.4 210260298768256Costs (dollars)F-A.5 2,183,376$ 1,709,770$ 1,736,363$ 5,629,510$ 1,876,503$Labor2,183,376$ 1,709,770$ 1,736,363$ 5,629,510$ 1,876,503$O & M-$ -$ -$ -$ -$Capital-$ -$ -$ -$ -$Burden per respondent2,307.6Cost per respondent98,763$Total - PWS and StatesBurden (hours)F-A.2 176,03876,56178,153330,751110,250Respondents (number)F-A.3 6,0131,7931,7936,0133,199Responses (number)F-A.4 137,42757,26657,343252,03784,012Cost (dollars)F-A.5 20,234,234$ 17,699,364$ 17,761,290$ 55,694,889$ 18,564,963$Labor6,100,092$ 2,851,366$ 2,913,292$ 11,864,750$ 3,954,917$O & M14,134,142$ 14,847,998$ 14,847,998$ 43,830,139$ 14,610,046$Capital-$ -$ -$ -$ -$Burden per respondent55.0Cost per respondent9,263$Note: Detail may not add to total due to rounding.Exhibit F-A.1 Summary of Burden, Respondents, Responses, and Costs for the ICR Approval PeriodThe number of respondents is not added; rather the maximum number of respondents for the 3 years for a given activity is used toavoid double-counting.Microbial Rules ICR - LT2ESWTRF-A-1July 2008Exhibit F-A.2 Burden for the ICR Approval Period (Hours)Year 4 Year 5 Year 6Source October-08 October-09 October-10 Annual(Exhibit) September-09 September-10 September-11 TotalAveragePWSsStart-up [1]F-B.2 -----Assessment for binning [2]E. coliMonitoring F-B.4 79,873--79,87326,624CryptosporidiumMonitoring F-B.5 19,09130,85030,85080,79226,931Reporting F-B.6 25,0803,5483,54832,17610,725UCFWR Reporting [3] F-B.8 -----Technology Reporting F-B.11 ----Disinfection Benchmarking [4] F-B.12 9792,2143,1846,3772,126Assessment for Bin Reclassification ----E. coliMonitoring F-B.14 -----CryptosporidiumMonitoring F-B.15 -----Reporting F-B.16 -----PWSs - Total 125,02436,61237,583199,21866,406States and TerritoriesStart-up [5] F-B.3 -----Bin Determination and Reviewing MonitoringData [6]F-B.7 50,38838,53238,532127,45242,484Reviewing/Approving UCFWR Schedule [7] F-B.9 -----Technology Reporting F-B.10 -----Disinfection Benchmarking [8] F-B.13 6271,4172,0384,0811,360States and Territories - Total 51,01539,94940,570131,53342,484Total 176,03876,56178,153330,751108,890Note: Detail may not add to total due to rounding.Sources:See Exhibit F-C.1 for breakdown of burden by year and system type.(5) State rule start-up activities will parallel system activities.(6) Bin determination and monitoring review are assumed to parallel system monitoring and reporting activities.(8) Disinfection profiling and benchmarking activities will parallel system activities.(1) Start-up burden is assumed to have been completed in Year 3.(3) Reporting requirements associated with uncovered finished water reservoirs are assumed to have been completed in Year 3.(7) State activities related to uncovered finished water reservoirs parallel system activities.(2) Half ofE. colimonitoring by systems serving up to 49,999 people will be completed in Year 4 (the other half was completed in Year 3). Half ofCryptosporidiummonitoring by systems serving 10,000-49,999 people will be completed in Year 4 (the other half was completed in Year 3).Cryptosporidiummonitoring for systems serving <10,000 people will be completed in Years 5 and 6.(4) Disinfection profiling and benchmarking are assumed to occur before systems begin installing treatment.Microbial Rules ICR - LT2ESWTRF-A-2July 2008Year 4 Year 5 Year 6Source October-08 October-09 October-10 Annual(Exhibit) September-09 September-10 September-11 Total [11] AveragePWSsStart-up [1,2] F-B.2 -----Assessment for binning [3, 4]E. coliMonitoring F-B.4 5,902--5,9021,967CryptosporidiumMonitoring F-B.5 1,068863863 1,068931Reporting F-B.6 5,9561,7361,7365,9563,142UCFWR Reporting [5] F-B.8 -----Technology Reporting F-B.11 -----Disinfection Benchmarking [6] F-B.12 249637637637507Assessment for Bin Reclassification--E. coliMonitoring F-B.14 --CryptosporidiumMonitoring F-B.15 --Reporting F-B.16 --PWSs - Total 5,9561,7361,7365,9563,142States and TerritoriesStart-up [7] F-B.3 -----Bin Determination and Reviewing MonitoringData [8]F-B.7 5757575757Reviewing/Approving UCFWR Schedule [9] F-B.9 -----Technology Reporting F-B.10 -----Disinfection Benchmarking [10] F-B.13 5757575757States and Territories - Total 5757575757Total 6,0131,7931,7936,0133,199Note: Detail may not add to total due to rounding.Sources(1) Each PWS is assumed to be a respondent.(3) Each plant is assumed to be a respondent.(7) Start-up is assumed to have been completed in Years 1-3.(8) Each State will be a respondent associated with reviewing monitoring data.(11) To avoid double-counting the number of respondents for assessment for binning and for State activities, the highest numberof respondents for an activityfor each year is used for the total number of respondents.(4) Systems serving up to 49,999 people will conduct half of theirE. colimonitoring in Year 4. Systems serving 10,000-49,999 people will conduct half of theirCryptosporidiummonitoring in Year 4. Systems serving <10,000 people will conductCryptosporidiummonitoring in Years 5 and 6.(2) Start-up is assumed to have been completed in Years 1-3.Exhibit F-A.3 Respondents for the ICR Approval Period(5) Activities associated with uncovered finished water reservoirs are assumed to have been completed in Years 1-3.(9) Activities associated with uncovered finished water reservoirs are assumed to have been completed in Years 1-3.(6) Systems are assumed to conduct disinfection profiling and benchmarking prior to installing treatment.(10) State activities for reviewing disinfection benchmarks are assumed to parallel system activities for profiling and benchmarking.Microbial Rules ICR - LT2ESWTRF-A-3July 2008Year 4 Year 5 Year 6Source October-08 October-09 October-10 Annual(Exhibit) September-09 September-10 September-11 Total AveragePWSsStart-up [1] F-B.2 -----Assessment for binning [2]E. coli Monitoring F-B.4 75,668--75,66825,223Cryptosporidium Monitoring F-B.5 13,88522,43622436 58,75812,107Reporting F-B.6 47,62634,48134,481116,58838,863UCFWR Reporting [3] F-B.8 -----Technology Reporting F-B.11 -----Disinfection Benchmarking [4] F-B.12 3989127255Assessment for Bin Reclassification--E. coli MonitoringF-B.14 -----Cryptosporidium MonitoringF-B.15 -----Reporting F-B.16 -----PWSs - Total 137,21757,00657,045251,26876,192Exhibit F-A.4 Responses for the ICR Approval PeriodStates and TerritoriesStart-up [5] F-B.3 -----Bin Determination and ReviewingMonitoring Data [6]F-B.7 171171171513171Reviewing/approving UCFWR schedule [7] F-B.9 -----Technology Reporting F-B.10 ---Disinfection Benchmarking [8] F-B.13 398912725585States and Territories - Total 210260298768256Total 137,42757,26657,343252,03776,448Note: Detail may not add to total due to rounding.Sources(1) Start-up is assumed to have been completed in Years 1-3.(2) For monitoring, each sample taken is considered to be a response, and two additional responses are added (one for sample schedule/location and one forbin classification). Systems serving up to 49,999 people will conduct half of their E. coli monitoring in Year 4. Systems serving 10,000-49,999 people willconduct half of their Cryptosporidium monitoring in Year 4. Systems serving <10,000 people will conduct Cryptosporidium monitoring in Years 5 and 6.(3) Activities associated with uncovered finished water reservoirs are assumed to have been completed in Years 1-3.(4) Disinfection profiling and benchmarking are considered 1 response. Profiling is assumed to be conducted prior to treatmentinstallation.(5) State start-up activities are assumed to have been completed in Years 1-3.(6) Each State will have 3 responses associated with binning and reviewing monitoring data (see Exhibit F-B.7). The number of responses from States andTerritories equals three times the number of small systems performing E. coli monitoring in a given year.(7) Activities associated with uncovered finished water reservoirs are assumed to have been completed in Years 1-3.(8) State reviews of disinfection benchmarks will parallel system activities. One response per system conducting benchmarking is assumed.Microbial Rules ICR - LT2ESWTRF-A-4July 2008Year 4 Year 5 Year 6 TotalSource October-08 to September-09 October-09 to September-10 October-10 to September-11 October-08 to September-11 Annual(Exhibit) Labor O&M Capital Labor O&M Capital Labor O&M Capital Labor O&M Capital Total AveragePWSsStart-up [1] F-B.2 -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$Assessment for binning [2]E. coli Monitoring F-B.4 2,453,478$ 4,945,544$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 2,453,478$ 4,945,544$ -$ 7,399,022$ 2,466,341$Cryptosporidium Monitoring F-B.5 586,437$ 9,188,598$ -$ 947,633$ 14,847,998$ -$ 947,633$ 14,847,998$ -$ 2,481,703$ 38,884,595$ -$ 41,366,298$ 13,788,766$Reporting F-B.6 841,173$ -$ -$ 113,401$ -$ -$ 113,401$ -$ -$ 1,067,974$ -$ -$ 1,067,974$ 355,991$UCFWR Reporting [3] F-B.8 -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$Technology Reporting F-B.11 -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$Disinfection Benchmarking [4] F-B.12 35,628$ -$ -$ 80,562$ -$ -$ 115,895$ -$ -$ 232,085$ -$ -$ 232,085$ 77,362$Assessment for Bin ReclassificationE. coli Monitoring F-B.14 -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$Cryptosporidium Monitoring F-B.15 -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$Reporting F-B.16 -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$PWSs - Total 3,916,716$ 14,134,142$ -$ 1,141,596$ 14,847,998$ -$ 1,176,929$ 14,847,998$ -$ 6,235,241$ 43,830,139$ -$ 50,065,379$ 16,688,460$States and TerritoriesStart-up [5] F-B.3 -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$Reporting and bin determination F-B.7 2,156,562$ -$ -$ 1,649,135$ -$ -$ 1,649,135$ -$ -$ 5,454,832$ -$ -$ 5,454,832$ 1,818,277$Reviewing/Approving UCFWR Schedule [6] F-B.9 -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$Technology Reporting F-B.10 -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$Disinfection Benchmarking [7] F-B.13 26,815$ -$ -$ 60,635$ -$ -$ 87,228$ -$ -$ 174,677$ -$ -$ 174,677$ 58,226$States and Territories - Total 2,183,376$ -$ -$ 1,709,770$ -$ -$ 1,736,363$ -$ -$ 5,629,510$ -$ -$ 5,629,510$ 1,876,503$Total 6,100,092$ 14,134,142$ -$ 2,851,366$ 14,847,998$ -$ 2,913,292$ 14,847,998$ -$ 11,864,750$ 43,830,139$ -$ 55,694,889$ 18,564,963$Note: Detail may not add to total due to rounding.SourcesSee Exhibit F-C.2 for a breakdown of cost by year and system type.(7) State costs associated with reviewing disinfection benchmarks are assumed to parallel system costs.Exhibit F-A.5 Cost for the ICR Approval Period(3) Systems are assumed to have incurred costs associated with uncovered finished water reservoirs during Years 1-3.(6) Costs associated with reviewing reports on uncovered finished water reservoirs are assumed to have been incurred during Years 1-3.(1) Start-up is assumed to have been completed in Years 1-3.(2) 1/2 ofE. coliandCryptosporidiummonitoring by systems serving 10K-49,999 will take place in Year 4 (the remainder was completed in Year 3).1/2 ofE. colimonitoring by systems serving < 10K will take place in Year 4 (the remainder was completed in Year 3).1/2 ofCryptosporidiummonitoring by systems serving <10K will take place in Year 5 and 1/2 will take place in Year 6.(5) State rule start-up activities will parallel system activities.(4) Costs associated with disinfection profiling and benchmarking are assumed to be incurred prior to treatment installation.Microbial Rules ICR - LT2ESWTRF-A-5July 2008Implementation Monitoring for Initial Bin Classification Future Monitoring for Re-BinningNumber ofFilteredSystemsNumber ofUnfilteredSystemsBaseline #PWSsPercent ofPlants with >5.5 LogTreatmentPrior to RulePromulgationPlantsPerSystemBaseline # ofPlantsConductingE.coliMonitoringPercent ofPlantsTriggered toMonitor forCryptosporidiumBaseline # ofPlantsConductingCryptosporidiumMonitoringPercent ofPlants with >5.5 LogTreatment forLT2CompliancePercent ofPlants with >5.5 LogTreatment forStage 2ComplianceBaseline # ofPlantsConductingE. coliMonitoringBaseline # ofPlantsConductingCryptosporidiumMonitoringA B C=A+B D E F = A*E*(1-D) G H=F*G+B*E I J K = F*(1-I-J) L = G*KCWSs<100 4371438 3.6% 1.0 42135% 148 5.3% 15.0% 336117100-499 6554659 3.6% 1.0 63235% 224 5.3% 6.3% 558194500-999 3623365 3.6% 1.0 36335% 129 5.3% 6.3% 3211121,000-3,299 92915944 3.6% 1.0 93235% 340 9.7% 1.8% 8242873,300-9,999 991141,005 3.6% 1.1 1,00335% 364 9.5% 1.8% 89031010,000-49,999 94814962 0.4% 1.1 1,0481,064 30.4% 1.5% 71571550,000-99,999 2144218 0.4% 1.1 237241 30.3% 1.5% 161161100,000-999,999 2264230 0.4% 1.6 369376 29.7% 1.5% 2542541,000,000+ 14115 0.4% 1.6 2325 29.7% 1.5% 1616National Totals 4,777604,8375,0282,9104,0752,165NTNCWSs<100 129-129 3.6% 1.0 12435% 43 5.3% 15.0% 9935100-499 148-148 3.6% 1.0 14335% 50 5.3% 6.3% 12644500-999 60-60 3.6% 1.0 5835% 20 5.3% 6.3% 51181,000-3,299 33-33 3.6% 1.0 3235% 11 9.7% 1.8% 28103,300-9,999 5-5 3.6% 1.0 535% 2 9.5% 1.8% 4110,000-49,999 2-2 0.4% 1.0 22 30.4% 1.5% 1150,000-99,999 --0 0.4% 1.0 -0 0.0% 1.5% -0100,000-999,999 --0 0.4% 1.0 -0 0.0% 1.5% -01,000,000+ --0 0.4% 1.0 -0 0.0% 1.5% -0National Totals 377-377364128310109TNCWSs<100 636-636 0.0% 1.0 63635% 221 5.3% 0.0% 603210100-499 375-375 0.0% 1.0 37535% 131 5.3% 0.0% 355124500-999 62-62 0.0% 1.0 6235% 22 5.3% 0.0% 59201,000-3,299 44-44 0.0% 1.0 4435% 15 9.7% 0.0% 40143,300-9,999 19-19 0.0% 1.0 1935% 7 9.5% 0.0% 17610,000-49,999 2-2 0.0% 1.0 22 30.4% 0.0% 1150,000-99,999 --0 0.0% 1.0 -0 0.0% 0.0% -0100,000-999,999 1-1 0.0% 1.0 11 14.8% 0.0% 111,000,000+ --0 0.0% 1.0 -0 58.6% 0.0% -0National Totals 1,139-1,1391,1393981,076376Grand Totals 6,294606,3546,5313,4365,4622,650Notes:Detail may not add exactly to totals due to rounding.Sources:(J) EPA assumes only membrane plants will have > 5.5 logCryptosporidiumtreatment as a result of the Stage 2 DBPR. Estimates from the Economic Analysis for the Stage 2 DBPR.System Size(Population Served)(I) Derived from Appendix G of the LT2ESWTR Economic Analysis; this number is calculated by dividing the number of plants achieving 5.5 log treatment for the LT2ESWTR by the total number of plants for thesize category.(C) Number of systems from SDWIS/FED Data from October 2007.(D) EPA assumes only membrane filtration plants will have > 5.5 logCryptosporidiumtreatment prior to rule promulgation. Plants estimated to have membrane filtration as a result of Stage 1 DBPR complianceare from the Economic Analysis for the Stage 2 DBPR.(E) For CWSs, from Exhibit 5.1 of the Draft Final Model Systems Report prepared for EPA by the Cadmus Group, Inc., in March 2005. The exhibit is an analysis of data from the 2000 Community Water SystemSurvey. Includes treated entry points. Excludes 2 outlier systems that had more than 100 entry points, as well as 27 systems that provided insufficient information on their treated entry points. For NCWSs,assumed to be 1.0.(G) Percentage of plants triggered intoCryptosporidiummonitoring is estimated from the modelled Information Collection Rule Occurrence Distribution.Exhibit F-B.1a Baseline Number of Plants for Rule Start-up and Monitoring ActivitiesMicrobial Rules ICR - LT2ESWTRF-B-1July 2008

# Cost Assumptions: Labor Rate Components

Base Hourly

Labor Cost ECI in Year of

Data ECI 2007 2007 Labor

Cost

A B C D=A*(C/B)

39.87 $ 100.8 108.2 42.80 $

Technical Wage Rates by System Size



# 25-100 101-500 500-3.3k 3.3k-10k 10k-100k >100k

Base Wage Rate ($2006) 17.87 $ 17.87 $ 17.87 $ 17.87 $ 17.87 $ 17.87 $

Loaded Wage Rate ( $ 2006) 28.59 $ 28.59 $ 28.59 $ 28.59 $ 28.59 $ 28.59 $

Loaded Wage Rate ($2007) 30.72 $ 30.72 $ 30.72 $ 30.72 $ 30.72 $ 30.72 $

Source: BLS 2007

Managerial and Clerical Wage Rates by System Size



# 25-100 101-500 >500

Base Manager Wage Rate ( $ 2000) 30.77 $ 30.77 $ 30.77 $

Loaded Manager Wage Rate ( $ 2000) 40.00 $ 43.08 $ 46.16 $

Loaded Manager Wage Rate ($2007) 51.21 $ 55.16 $ 59.10 $

Base Clerical Wage Rate ($2000) 10.61 $ 10.61 $ 10.61 $

Loaded Clerical Wage Rate ($2000) 13.79 $ 14.85 $ 15.92 $

Loaded Clerical Wage Rate ( $ 2007) 17.95 $ 19.33 $ 20.72 $

Cost Assumptions: Estimated System Labor Costs per Hour by System Size

25-100 101-500 500-3.3k 3.3-10k 10k-100k >100k

30.72 $ 30.72 $ 30.72 $ 36.39 $ 36.39 $ 36.39 $

Notes: 

# Exhibit F-B.1b Labor Rates

Sources: (A) State employee wage (2006$) from BLS SOC Code 19-2041, "State Government - Environmental Scientists and

Specialists, Including Health" Multiplied by a loading rate of 1.6 to account for benefits.

(B)ECI for state employee from BLS (2008) from 2006 (State and local government; Total compensation; All workers, not seasonall y

adjusted). www.bls.gov.

(C) ECI for state employee from BLS (2008) from 2007 (State and local government; Total compensation; All workers, not seasonal ly

adjusted). www.bls.gov. State Employee

EPA estimates that systems with population greater than 3,300 use a combination of operators (technical) and engineers (manager ial), with an 80/20 ratio

between the two, respectively. Cost Element



# Rate System size

Labor cost (per hour) Cost Component Population Category Source: 2000 Base rates: Labor Costs for National Drinking Water Rules (USEPA, 2003). Adjusted to 2007

values using ECI recalculated to base of June 1989 = 100. For managerial rate used White Collar, Professional

specialty and technical, not seasonally adjusted. For clerical used Administrative support, including clerical. 

# Rate S ystem s i ze

Microbial Rules ICR - LT2ESWTR F-B-2 July 2008

# Laboratory Cost Per Sample [1]

Range [2]

Min Ma x

Cryptosporidium [3] 662 $ 486 $ 891 $ $17,206

E. Coli

(1) Utility Analysis 26 15 47 682

(2) Commercial Lab [4] 87 75 106 2,275

Costs Averag e Minimum Maximum

Crypto Analytical 504 $ 375 $ 605 $

E. coli Analytica l

Commercial 44 $ 31 $ 62 $

Utility 26 $ 15 $ 47 $

Shipping (lbs)

7 44

25 87

50 136

Mean - 37. 6 111 59 152

Subsample 47 0 175

Crypto Total $ 662 $ 486 $ 891

E. coli commercial

Total $ 87 $ 75 $ 106

E. coli analytical Total $ 26 $ 15 $ 47 

# Exhibit F-B.1b (continued) Labor Rates

E. coli commercial shipping costs were estimated by

assuming that two 125-mL sample containers would be

shipped to the laboratory in a 10-quart polyethylene cooler

packed with approximately 4 lb of UTEK gel paks.

The approximate weight of the shipment, given these

assumptions, is 7 lb. Using this weight, we estimated shipping

costs for standard overnight service for shipments to 12

locations using the Fed Ex web site. Total Laboratory

Cost per Plant Average

[1] Lab costs based on EPA subcontractor (DynCorp) survey of laboratories.

Cryptosporidium costs assume all plants must send samples to commercial

laboratories and that 27 percent of samples will require multiple subsamples

analysis at additional cost (based on Supplemental Survey results). E. Coli costs

are provided for utility analysis (no shipping) and commercial analysis, which

includes overnight shipping charges.

[3] Assumes monthly Cryptosporidium monitoring, plus two matrix spike samples

to be analyzed at the beginning of monitoring and bi-weekly E. Coli monitoring.

These are conservative estimates, therefore laboratory costs could be lower. [2] Minimum costs are estimated from DynCorp for the minimum analytical cost

and the mean cost for shipping a 37.6 pound package (average weight of

sample as observed during the Supplemental Survey, estimated by Kevin

Connell) overnight (FedEx). Maximum costs are estimated from DynCorp for the

maximum analytical costs, the mean cost for shipping a 37.6 pound package

(average weight of sample as observed during the Supplemental Survey,

estimated by Kevin connell) overnight (FedEx), and the maximum cost of an

additional subsample analysis, also estimated by DynCorp. Analyte

Note: Lab costs per sample updated to $2007, from BLS, using PPI (all

commodities).

Note: Lab costs per sample and shipping costs updated to

$2007, from BLS, using PPI (all commodities).

Microbial Rules ICR - LT2ESWTR F-B-3 July 2008System Size(PopulationServed)ReadHours perPWSTrainHours perPWSTotalHours perPWSCost perLabor HourBaseline #of SystemsConductingImplementation Total CostTotal Burden(Hours)Total Burden(FTEs)AB C = A + B D E F = C*D*E G = C*E H = G/2080CWSs<100 35155030.72$ 438672,962$ 21,90810.5100-499 35155030.72$ 6591,012,450$ 32,96015.8500-999 35155030.72$ 365560,689$ 18,2538.81,000-3,299 35155030.72$ 9441,450,384$ 47,21722.73,300-9,999 35155036.39$ 1,0051,829,158$ 50,26024.210,000-49,999 35155036.39$ 9621,750,533$ 48,10023.150,000-99,999 35306536.39$ 218515,697$ 14,1706.8100,000-999,999 35306536.39$ 230544,084$ 14,9507.21,000,000+ 35306536.39$ 1535,484$ 9750.5National Totals 4,8378,371,441$ 248,794119.6NTNCWSs<100 35155030.72$ 129198,278$ 6,4553.1100-499 35155030.72$ 148227,308$ 7,4003.6500-999 35155030.72$ 6092,152$ 3,0001.41,000-3,299 35155030.72$ 3350,744$ 1,6520.83,300-9,999 35155036.39$ 59,098$ 2500.110,000-49,999 35155036.39$ 23,813$ 1050.150,000-99,999 35306536.39$ --$ --100,000-999,999 35306536.39$ --$ --1,000,000+ 35306536.39$ --$ --National Totals 377581,393$ 18,8629.1TNCWSs<100 35155030.72$ 636977,014$ 31,80715.3100-499 35155030.72$ 375575,978$ 18,7519.0500-999 35155030.72$ 6295,224$ 3,1001.51,000-3,299 35155030.72$ 4467,578$ 2,2001.13,300-9,999 35155036.39$ 1934,913$ 9590.510,000-49,999 35155036.39$ 23,639$ 1000.050,000-99,999 35306536.39$ --$ --100,000-999,999 35306536.39$ 12,366$ 650.01,000,000+ 35306536.39$ --$ --National Totals 1,1391,756,711$ 56,98227.4Grand Totals 6,35410,709,546$ 324,638156.1Notes:Detail may not add exactly to totals due to rounding.Sources:Exhibit F-B.2 Burden and Cost to PWSs Associated with Rule Start-Up Activities (Completed in Years1-3)(A & B) Burden estimates take into account the results of the February 2008 consultation with water industry representatives.(D) For systems serving up to 3,300 people, the full technical rate was applied. For systems serving more than 3,300 people, costs are based onan 80%/20% split between technical and managerial rates. Technical rates are from BLS(2006), adjusted to $2007. Managerial rates are based onLabor Costs for National Drinking Water Rules (USEPA, 2003), inflated to $2007.(E) Taken from Exhibit F-B.1, column A.Burden shown here is assumed to have been incurred in Years 1-3 and is not included in the totals for the LT2ESWTR. It is shownforinformational purposes only.Microbial Rules ICR - LT2ESWTRF-B-4July 2008Implementation ActivitiesCost perLabor Hour FTEs per State Hours per State Cost Per StateAB C = B*2080 D = A*CRegulation Adoption and Program Development 42.80$ 1.002,08089,022$Training State Staff 42.80$ 0.501,04044,511$Training PWS Staff and Technical Assistants 42.80$ 1.002,08089,022$Updating Data Management System 42.80$ 0.2552022,256$Public Notification 42.80$ 0.102088,902$Totals per State 2.855,928253,713$National Totals (57 States/Primacy Agencies) 162.45337,89614,461,648$Notes:Detail may not add to totals due to rounding.All States/Primacy Agencies are assumed to incur some costs for each activity.1 FTE = 2,080 hours (40 hours/week; 52 weeks/year)Sources:(A) State labor rates based on the State Workload Model, updated to current dollar values.(B) FTEs per State/Primacy Agency take into account the results of the February 2008 consultation with water industry representatives.Exhibit F-B.3 Burden and Cost to States and Primacy Agencies Associatedwith Rule Start-up Activities (Completed in Years 1-3)Burden shown here is assumed to have been incurred in Years 1-3 and is not included in the totals for the LT2ESWTR. It is shownfor informational purposes only.Microbial Rules ICR - LT2ESWTRF-B-5July 2008Sampling Sample Analysis# ofE.coliSamplesHoursperSampleCostperLaborHourTotal SamplingLabor CostCommercialAnalysis(IncludesShipping)UtilityAnalysisHours perSample(Labor)UtilityAnalysisCost perSample(O&M)UtilityAnalysisCost perSample(Total)PercentUtilities withE. coliAnalysisCapabilitiesTotalLaboratoryAnalysis Cost(Labor)Total LaboratoryAnalysis Cost(O&M) Responses RespondentsA B C D E = A*B*C*D F G H = I-G*D I J K = D*G*J*A*BL = F*A*B*(1-J)+H*A*B*J M = E+K+L N = A*B*C+A*B*G*JO =N/2,080 P = A*B QCWSs<100 42126 1.0030.72$ 336,572$ 87.49$ 0.166667 21.13$ 26.25$ 25% 14,024$ 776,828$ 1,127,424$ 11,4145.510,957421100-499 63226 1.0030.72$ 504,441$ 87.49$ 0.166667 21.13$ 26.25$ 25% 21,018$ 1,164,279$ 1,689,738$ 17,1068.216,422632500-999 36326 1.0030.72$ 289,903$ 87.49$ 0.166667 21.13$ 26.25$ 25% 12,079$ 669,111$ 971,093$ 9,8314.79,4383631,000-3,299 93226 1.0030.72$ 744,120$ 87.49$ 0.166667 21.13$ 26.25$ 25% 31,005$ 1,717,470$ 2,492,595$ 25,23412.124,2259323,300-9,999 1,00326 1.0030.72$ 801,286$ 87.49$ 0.166667 21.13$ 26.25$ 25% 33,387$ 1,849,411$ 2,684,084$ 27,17313.126,0861,00310,000-49,999 1,04824 1.0030.72$ 772,915$ 87.49$ 0.166667 21.13$ 26.25$ 75% 96,614$ 949,039$ 1,818,567$ 28,30713.625,1621,04850,000-99,999 23724 1.0030.72$ 174,476$ 87.49$ 0.166667 21.13$ 26.25$ 75% 21,810$ 214,234$ 410,521$ 6,3903.15,680237100,000-999,999 36924 1.0030.72$ 272,240$ 87.49$ 0.166667 21.13$ 26.25$ 100% 45,373$ 187,241$ 504,854$ 10,3405.08,8633691,000,000+2324 1.0030.72$ 16,864$ 87.49$ 0.16666721.13$ 26.25$ 100% 2,811$ 11,599$ 31,274$ 6410.354923National Totals 5,0283,912,818$278,121$ 7,539,211$ 11,730,151$ 136,43665.6127,3825,028NTNCWSs<100 12426 1.00 30.72$ 99,393$ 87.49$ 0.166667 21.13$ 26.25$ 25% 4,141$ 229,404$ 332,939$ 3,3711.63,236124100-499 14326 1.00 30.72$ 113,945$ 87.49$ 0.166667 21.13$ 26.25$ 25% 4,748$ 262,991$ 381,684$ 3,8641.93,709143500-999 5826 1.00 30.72$ 46,194$ 87.49$ 0.166667 21.13$ 26.25$ 25% 1,925$ 106,618$ 154,737$ 1,5670.81,504581,000-3,299 3226 1.00 30.72$ 25,437$ 87.49$ 0.166667 21.13$ 26.25$ 25% 1,060$ 58,710$ 85,207$ 8630.4828323,300-9,999 526 1.00 30.72$ 3,849$ 87.49$ 0.166667 21.13$ 26.25$ 25% 160$ 8,885$ 12,895$ 1310.1125510,000-49,999 224 1.00 30.72$ 1,539$ 87.49$ 0.166667 21.13$ 26.25$ 75% 192$ 1,890$ 3,621$ 560.050250,000-99,999 -24 1.00 30.72$ -$ 87.49$ 0.166667 21.13$ 26.25$ 75% -$ -$ -$ ----100,000-999,999 -24 1.00 30.72$ -$ 87.49$ 0.166667 21.13$ 26.25$ 100% -$ -$ -$ ----1,000,000+-24 1.00 30.72$ -$ 87.49$ 0.16666721.13$ 26.25$ 100% -$ -$ -$ ----National Totals 364290,357$12,226$ 668,498$ 971,082$ 9,8514.79,453364TNCWSs<100 63626 1.00 30.72$ 508,047$ 87.49$ 0.166667 21.13$ 26.25$ 25% 21,169$ 1,172,601$ 1,701,817$ 17,2298.316,539636100-499 37526 1.00 30.72$ 299,509$ 87.49$ 0.166667 21.13$ 26.25$ 25% 12,480$ 691,282$ 1,003,270$ 10,1574.99,750375500-999 6226 1.00 30.72$ 49,516$ 87.49$ 0.166667 21.13$ 26.25$ 25% 2,063$ 114,286$ 165,866$ 1,6790.81,612621,000-3,299 4426 1.00 30.72$ 35,141$ 87.49$ 0.166667 21.13$ 26.25$ 25% 1,464$ 81,106$ 117,711$ 1,1920.61,144443,300-9,999 1926 1.00 30.72$ 15,323$ 87.49$ 0.166667 21.13$ 26.25$ 25% 638$ 35,367$ 51,328$ 5200.24991910,000-49,999 224 1.00 30.72$ 1,474$ 87.49$ 0.166667 21.13$ 26.25$ 75% 184$ 1,810$ 3,469$ 540.048250,000-99,999 -24 1.00 30.72$ -$ 87.49$ 0.166667 21.13$ 26.25$ 75% -$ -$ -$ ----100,000-999,999 124 1.00 30.72$ 737$ 87.49$ 0.166667 21.13$ 26.25$ 100% 123$ 507$ 1,367$ 280.02411,000,000+-24 1.00 30.72$ -$ 87.49$ 0.16666721.13$ 26.25$ 100% -$ -$ -$ ----National Totals 1,139909,747$38,121$ 2,096,960$ 3,044,828$ 30,85814.829,6171,139Grand Totals 6,5315,112,922$328,469$ 10,304,669$ 15,746,061$ 177,14485.2166,4516,531Notes:Detail may not add exactly to totals due to independent rounding.Sources:(A) Taken from Exhibit F-B.1, column D.(B) Bi-weekly source water monitoring for one year for small systems and monthly samples for 24 months for medium and large systems.(C) Estimate of labor for collecting sample and shipping, based on the results of the February 2008 consultation with water industry representatives and expert opinion.(D) All size categories were assumed to use a technical rate from BLS (2006), adjusted to $2007.(F) DynCorp study, Kevin Connell, June 2002 (updated to $2007).(G) Based on professional judgment and results of 2008 consultation with water industry representatives.(H) The amount left after labor is subtracted from the amount in column I.(I) DynCorp study, Kevin Connell, December 2000 (updated to $2007).(J) Estimate based on Third Edition Baseline Handbook data.Exhibit F-B.4 Burden and Cost to Plants Associated withE. coliMonitoring for Bin DeterminationTotal Burden(Hours)TotalBurden(FTEs)System Size(PopulationServed)Baseline # ofPlantsConductingE. coliMonitoringTotal CostMicrobial Rules ICR - LT2ESWTRF-B-6July 2008Sampling Sample Analysis# ofCryptosporidiumSamplesHoursperSampleCostperLaborHourTotalSamplingLabor CostCost perSampleTotal LaboratoryAnalysis Cost(O&M)A B C D E = A*B*C*D F G = A*B*F H = E+G I = A*B*C J = I/2080 K = A*BCWSs<100 14826 1.430.72$ 162,148$ 661.78$ 2,540,618$ 2,702,766$ 5,2792.53,839100-499 22426 1.430.72$ 245,768$ 661.78$ 3,850,815$ 4,096,583$ 8,0013.85,819500-999 12926 1.430.72$ 142,145$ 661.78$ 2,227,194$ 2,369,339$ 4,6282.23,3651,000-3,299 34026 1.430.72$ 373,192$ 661.78$ 5,847,370$ 6,220,562$ 12,1495.88,8363,300-9,999 36426 1.430.72$ 399,558$ 661.78$ 6,260,476$ 6,660,034$ 13,0086.39,46010,000-49,999 1,06426 1.430.72$ 1,168,386$ 661.78$ 18,306,865$ 19,475,250$ 38,03718.327,66350,000-99,999 24126 1.430.72$ 264,773$ 661.78$ 4,148,599$ 4,413,372$ 8,6204.16,269100,000-999,999 37626 1.430.72$ 412,728$ 661.78$ 6,466,840$ 6,879,569$ 13,4366.59,7721,000,000+ 2526 1.430.72$ 26,922$ 661.78$ 421,827$ 448,749$ 8760.4637National Totals2,9103,195,620$ 50,070,604$ 53,266,224$ 104,03350.075,661NTNCWSs<100 4326 1.430.72$ 47,560$ 661.78$ 745,187$ 792,746$ 1,5480.71,126100-499 5026 1.430.72$ 54,523$ 661.78$ 854,288$ 908,811$ 1,7750.91,291500-999 2026 1.430.72$ 22,104$ 661.78$ 346,333$ 368,437$ 7200.35231,000-3,299 1126 1.430.72$ 12,172$ 661.78$ 190,712$ 202,884$ 3960.22883,300-9,999 226 1.430.72$ 1,842$ 661.78$ 28,861$ 30,703$ 600.04410,000-49,999 226 1.430.72$ 2,292$ 661.78$ 35,919$ 38,212$ 750.05450,000-99,999 -26 1.430.72$ -$ 661.78$ -$ -$ ---100,000-999,999 -26 1.430.72$ -$ 661.78$ -$ -$ ---1,000,000+ -26 1.430.72$ -$ 661.78$ -$ -$ ---National Totals128140,492$ 2,201,300$ 2,341,792$ 4,5742.23,326TNCWSs<100 22126 1.430.72$ 243,101$ 661.78$ 3,809,025$ 4,052,125$ 7,9143.85,756100-499 13126 1.430.72$ 143,315$ 661.78$ 2,245,530$ 2,388,845$ 4,6662.23,393500-999 2226 1.430.72$ 23,694$ 661.78$ 371,242$ 394,936$ 7710.45611,000-3,299 1526 1.430.72$ 16,815$ 661.78$ 263,462$ 280,277$ 5470.33983,300-9,999 726 1.430.72$ 7,332$ 661.78$ 114,883$ 122,215$ 2390.117410,000-49,999 226 1.430.72$ 2,196$ 661.78$ 34,413$ 36,609$ 720.05250,000-99,999 -26 1.430.72$ -$ 661.78$ -$ -$ ---100,000-999,999 126 1.430.72$ 1,098$ 661.78$ 17,206$ 18,304$ 360.0261,000,000+ -26 1.430.72$ -$ 661.78$ -$ -$ ---National Totals398437,550$ 6,855,761$ 7,293,311$ 14,2446.810,360Grand Totals 3,4363,773,662$ 59,127,665$ 62,901,327$ 122,85159.189,347Notes:Detail may not add exactly to totals due to independent rounding.Sources:(A) Taken from Exhibit F-B.1a, column F.(C) Estimate of labor for collecting sample and shipping, based on the results of the February 2008 consultation with water industry representatives and expert opinion.(D) All size categories were assumed to use a technical rate from BLS (2006), adjusted to $2007.ResponsesExhibit F-B.5 Burden and Cost to Plants Associated withCryptosporidiumMonitoring for Bin DeterminationSystem Size(PopulationServed)Baseline #of PlantsConductingCryptosporidiumMonitoringTotal CostTotalBurden(Hours)TotalBurden(FTEs)(B) Semimonthly source water monitoring for one year for small systems and monthly samples for 24 months for medium and large systems, plus twomatrix spike samples.(F) Taken from Exhibit F-B.1b.Microbial Rules ICR - LT2ESWTRF-B-7July 2008System Size(Population Served)Source WaterSampling Planhours per plantBin Classificationhours per plantTotalhoursper plantCost perLaborHourBaseline #of PlantsReporting Total CostTotal Burden(Hours)Total Burden(FTEs)A B C=A+B D E F = C*D*E G = C*E H = G/2080CWSs<100 1 7 8 30.72$ 421103,561$ 3,3711.6100-499 1 7 8 30.72$ 632155,213$ 5,0532.4500-999 1 7 8 30.72$ 36389,201$ 2,9041.41,000-3,299 1 7 8 30.72$ 932228,960$ 7,4543.63,300-9,999 1 7 8 36.39$ 1,003292,110$ 8,0263.910,000-49,999 1 16 17 36.39$ 1,048648,652$ 17,8238.650,000-99,999 1 16 17 36.39$ 237146,426$ 4,0231.9100,000-999,999 10 16 26 36.39$ 369349,427$ 9,6014.61,000,000+ 10 16 26 36.39$ 2321,646$ 5950.3National Totals5,0282,035,195$ 58,85128.3NTNCWSs<100 1 7 8 30.72$ 124 30,582$ 9960.5100-499 1 7 8 30.72$ 143 35,060$ 1,1410.5500-999 1 7 8 30.72$ 58 14,213$ 4630.21,000-3,299 1 7 8 30.72$ 32 7,827$ 2550.13 300 9 99917836 39$51 403$390 0Exhibit F-B.6 Burden and Cost to Plants Associated with Reporting for Source Water Sampling Plan and Initial BinClassification Monitoring3,300-9,99917836.39$51,403$390.010,000-49,999 1 16 17 36.39$ 2 1,292$ 350.050,000-99,999 1 16 17 36.39$ 0 -$ --100,000-999,999 10 16 26 36.39$ 0 -$ --1,000,000+ 10 16 26 36.39$ 0 -$ --National Totals364 90,378$ 2,9291.4TNCWSs<100 1 7 8 30.72$ 636 156,322$ 5,0892.4100-499 1 7 8 30.72$ 375 92,156$ 3,0001.4500-999 1 7 8 30.72$ 62 15,236$ 4960.21,000-3,299 1 7 8 30.72$ 44 10,812$ 3520.23,300-9,999 1 7 8 36.39$ 19 5,586$ 1530.110,000-49,999 1 16 17 36.39$ 2 1,237$ 340.050,000-99,999 1 16 17 36.39$ 0 -$ --100,000-999,999 10 16 26 36.39$ 1 946$ 260.01,000,000+ 10 16 26 36.39$ 0 -$ --National Totals1,139 282,297$ 9,1514.4Grand Totals6,531 2,407,869$ 70,93034.1Notes:Detail may not add exactly to totals due to independent rounding.Sources:(A) Burden estimates take into account results of February 2008 consultation with water industry representatives.(B) Burden estimates take into account the results of the February 2008 consultation with water industry representatives.(E) Taken from Exhibit F-B.1, column D.(C) Although small systems will not reportE. coliandCryptosporidiumresults at the same time, the additional reporting burden is assumed to be negligible.The decrease in burden for small plants that reportE. colibut are exempt fromCryptosporidiummonitoring is also assumed to be negligible.(D) For systems serving up to 3,300 people, the full technical rate was applied. For systems serving more than 3,300 people, costs are based on an80%/20% split between technical and managerial rates. Technical rates are from BLS (2006), adjusted to $2007. Managerial ratesare based on Labor Costsfor National Drinking Water Rules (USEPA, 2003), inflated to $2007.Microbial Rules ICR - LT2ESWTRF-B-8July 2008Initial Monitoring for Small SystemsState ActivityFTEs per StateforE. coliMonitoringTotalHours forE. coliFTEs Per StateforCryptosporidiumMonitoringTotal Hours forCryptosporidiumTotal FTEsPer State Total HoursCost perLabor Hour Total CostA B = A*2080 C D = C*2080 E = A+C F = B+D G H = F*GAnalyze PWS Reports andMake Bin Classifications0.3 624 0.2 416 0.5 1040 42.80$ 44,511.08$Respond to PWS 0.3 624 0.2 416 0.5 1040 42.80$ 44,511.08$Recordkeeping 0.25 520 0.25 520 0.5 1040 42.80$ 44,511.08$Totals per State 0.9 1,768 0.7 1,352 1.5 3,120 133,533.23$National Totals (57States/Primacy Agencies)48.5 100,776 37.1 77,064 85.5 177,840 7,611,394$Notes:Detail may not add to totals due to independent rounding.All States/Primacy Agencies are assumed to incur some costs for each activity.1 FTE = 2,080 hours (40 hours/week; 52 weeks/year)Sources(A), (C) EPA estimated FTEs based on experience with similar regulations.(G) Based on 2006 BLS rates for state employees, adjusted to $2007.Future MonitoringState ActivityFTEs per StateforE. coliMonitoring inSmall SystemsTotalHours forE. coliinSmallSystemsFTEs Per StateforCryptosporidiumMonitoring inSmall SystemsTotal Hours forCryptosporidiuminSmall SystemsFTEs PerState forCryptosporidiumMonitoring inMedium &LargeSystemsTotal Hours forCryptosporidiumin Medium &Large SystemsTotal FTEsPer State Total HoursCost perLaborHour Total CostA B = A*2080 C D = C*2080 E F = E*2080 G = A+C+E H = B+D+F I J = H*IAnalyze PWS Report andMake Bin Classifications0.2 416 0.1 208 0.1 208 0.4 832 42.80$ 35,608.86$Respond to PWS 0.2 416 0.1 208 0.1 208 0.4 832 42.80$ 35,608.86$Recordkeeping 0.25 520 0.25 520 0.25 520 0.75 1560 42.80$ 66,766.61$Totals per State 0.7 1,352 0.5 936 0.5 936 1.6 3,224 137,984$National Totals (57States/Primacy Agencies)37.1 77,064 25.7 53,352 25.7 53,352 88.4 183,768 7,865,107$Notes:Detail may not add to totals due to independent rounding.All States/Primacy Agencies are assumed to incur some costs for each activity.1 FTE = 2,080 hours (40 hours/week; 52 weeks/year)Sources(A), (C), (E) EPA estimated FTEs based on experience with similar regulations.(I) Based on 2006 BLS rates for state employees, adjusted to $2007.Exhibit F-B.7 Burden and Cost to States Associated withE. coliandCryptosporidiumMonitoring and Bin Determination(Initial and Future Rounds)Microbial Rules ICR - LT2ESWTRF-B-9July 2008Exhibit F-B.8 Burden and Cost to PWSs Associated with UCFWR Reporting (Completed in Years 1-3)System Size(PopulationServed)ReportingUse ofUCFWRReporting Schedule forCovering UCFWR orDisinfecting UCFWR EffluentTotal Hoursper PWSCost perLabor HourBaseline # ofSystems withUCFWRs Total CostTotal Burden(Hours)Total Burden(FTEs)AB C = A + B D E F = C*D*E G = C*E H = G/2080CWSs<100 0.2588.2530.72$ 3760$ 250.01100-499 0.2588.2530.72$ --$ --500-999 0.2588.2530.72$ --$ --1,000-3,299 0.2588.2530.72$ --$ --3,300-9,999 0.2588.2536.39$ 92,702$ 740.0410,000-49,999 0.2588.2536.39$ 267,806$ 2150.1050,000-99,999 0.2588.2536.39$ 51,501$ 410.02100,000-999,999 0.2588.2536.39$ 3711,109$ 3050.151,000,000+ 0.2588.2536.39$ 1300$ 80.00National Totals8124,180$ 6680.3Notes:Detail may not add exactly to totals due to rounding.NTNCWS and TNCWS do not have UCFWRsSources:(A & B) Burden estimates for each activity are based on EPA experience with similar rules.(D) For systems serving up to 3,300 people, the full technical rate was applied. For systems serving more than 3,300 people, costs are based on an 80%/20% split between technicaland managerial rates. Technical rates are from BLS (2006), adjusted to $2007. Managerial rates are based on Labor Costs for National Drinking Water Rules (USEPA, 2003), inflated to$2007.(E) Exhibit 4.23, Economic Analysis for the LT2ESWTRBurden shown here is assumed to have been incurred in Years 1-3 and is not included in the totals for the LT2ESWTR. It is shownfor informational purposes only.Microbial Rules ICR - LT2ESWTRF-B-10July 2008State/Primacy Agency ActivityBaseline # of Systems withUCFWRsCost per LaborHourFTEs perUCFWRHours perUCFWRCost PerUCFWRAB C D E = B*DRecording Use of UCFWR 81 42.80$ 0.00010.2510.7$Approving State Schedule81 42.800.0005142.8$Totals per UCFWR 0.00061.2553.5$Burden and Cost per State/Primacy Agency 0.0114.46619.1$Notes:Detail may not add to totals due to rounding.Only the seven States/Primacy Agencies with UCFWRs are assumed to incur burden and costs for these activities.1 FTE = 2,080 hours (40 hours/week; 52 weeks/year)Sources:(A) Carried forward from January 2006 ICR (expert estimates).(B) State labor rates 2006 BLS rates for state employees, adjusted to $2007.(C) FTEs per State/Primacy Agency based on EPA experience with previous regulations.Exhibit F-B.9 Burden and Cost to States and Primacy Agencies Associatedwith Reviewing/Approving UCFWR Schedule (Completed in Years 1-3)Burden shown here is assumed to have been incurred in Years 1-3 and is not included in the totals for the LT2ESWTR. It is shownfor informational purposes only.Microbial Rules ICR - LT2ESWTRF-B-11July 2008System Size(PopulationServed)Numberof PlantsInstallingUVNumberof PlantsInstallingMF/UFNumber ofPlantsInstallingBankFiltrationNumber ofUnfilteredPlantsInstallingOzone Total PlantsAnnualLaborHours perPlantLaborRateTotalAnnualLaborHoursTotal AnnualCostsA B C D E = A+B+C+D F G H = E*F I = G*H<100 8588--17340 42.80$ 6,914295,927$100-499 7968--14740 42.80$ 5,896252,328$500-999 3237-06940 42.80$ 2,763118,259$1,000-3,299 12527-115440 42.80$ 6,145263,011$3,300-9,999 11623-114040 42.80$ 5,598239,604$10,000-49,999 366224139240 42.80$ 15,687671,403$50,000-99,999 10051010740 42.80$ 4,263182,445$100,000-999,999 11561012240 42.80$ 4,891209,334$1,000,000+ 2110-2240 42.80$ 88337,774$National Totals 1,038277641,32653,0402,270,085$Notes:Detail may not add exactly to totals due to independent rounding.UV stands for ultraviolet disinfection and MF/UF stands for microfiltration/ultrafiltration.Sources:(A)-(D) Taken from Appendix G of the Economic Analysis for the LT2ESWTR.(F) Burden estimates take into account the results of the February 2008 consultation with water industry representatives.(G) Based 2006 BLS rates for state employees, adjusted to $2007.Exhibit F-B.10 Burden and Cost to States Associated with Reviewing Plants' Reports on Technology Compliance (Beginning Year 7)Microbial Rules ICR - LT2ESWTRF-B-12July 2008System Size(PopulationServed)NumberPlantsInstallingUVNumberof PlantsInstallingMF/UFNumber ofPlants InstallingBank FiltrationNumber ofUnfilteredPlants InstallingOzone Total PlantsAnnualLaborHours perPlantLaborRateTotalAnnualLaborHoursTotal AnnualCostsA B C D E=A+B+C+D F G H=E*F I=G*HCWS<100 1654--696030.724,143127,262$100-499 3748--856030.725,112157,034$500-999 2331-0536030.723,19798,209$1,000-3,299 11125-11386030.728,260253,736$3,300-9,999 11223-11366036.398,141296,276$10,000-49,999 36121413876036.3923,219845,007$50,000-99,999 1005101076036.396,394232,710$100,000-999,999 1146101226036.397,301265,707$1,000,000+ 2010-216036.391,28846,876$National Totals893214641,11867,0552,322,818$NTNCWS<100 928--376030.722,20567,744$100-499 1317--306030.721,80355,396$500-999 56--106030.7260918,717$1,000-3,299 82--96030.7256917,471$3,300-9,999 20--26036.391495,410$10,000-49,999 100-26036.39913,323$50,000-99,999 -----6036.39--$100,000-999,999 000-06036.3918643$1,000,000+ -----6036.39--$National Totals38520-915,445168,706$TNCWS<100 607--676030.724,023123,578$100-499 293--326030.721,92859,217$500-999 51--66030.7233810,386$1,000-3,299 60--66030.7238911,940$3,300-9,999 20--26036.391083,929$10,000-49,999 400-46036.392218,046$50,000-99,999 -----6036.39--$100,000-999,999 000-06036.3918655$1,000,000+ 100-16036.39361,305$National Totals107110-1187,061219,056$Grand Totals 1,038277641,32679,5612,710,580$Notes:Detail may not add exactly to totals due to independent rounding.UV stands for ultraviolet disinfection and MF/UF stands for microfiltration/ultrafiltration.Sources:(A), (B), (C), (D) Taken from Appendix G of the LT2ESWTR Economic Analysis.(F) Burden estimate takes into account the results of the February 2008 consultation with water industry representatives.(G) For systems serving up to 3,300 people, the full technical rate was applied. For systems serving more than 3,300 people, costsare based on an 80%/20% split between technical and managerial rates. Technical rates are from BLS (2006), adjusted to $2007.Managerial rates are based on Labor Costs for National Drinking Water Rules (USEPA, 2003), inflated to $2007.Exhibit F-B.11 Filtered and Unfiltered Plant Burden and Cost for Preparing Reports Demonstrating Technology Compliance (Beginning Year 7)Some unfiltered plants may install ozone treatment, but no new burden is expected to be incurred because ozone will replace thecurrently useddisinfectant.Microbial Rules ICR - LT2ESWTRF-B-13July 2008System Size(PopulationServed)Numberof PlantsInstallingUVNumber ofPlantsInstallingMF/UFNumber ofUnfilteredPlantsInstallingOzoneTotalNumber ofPlantsChangingDisinfectionAnnualLabor Hoursper Plant Labor RateTotalAnnualLaborHoursTotal AnnualCostsAB C D = A+B+C E F G = D*E H = F*GCWS<100 1654-692530.721,72653,025.65$100-499 3748-852530.722,13065,430.99$500-999 23310532530.721,33240,920.59$1,000-3,299 1112511382530.723,442105,723.39$3,300-9,999 1122311362536.393,392123,448.47$10,000-49,999 3612113832536.399,580348,642.16$50,000-99,999 100501062536.392,63896,017.83$100,000-999,999 114601202536.393,012109,631.45$1,000,000+ 201-212536.3953419,421.67$National Totals 89321441,111225962,262.22$NTNCWS<100 928-372530.7291928,226.86$100-499 1317-302530.7275123,081.80$500-999 56-102530.722547,798.94$1,000-3,299 82-92530.722377,279.72$3,300-9,999 20-22536.39622,254.27$10,000-49,999 10-22536.39381,370.08$50,000-99,999 ----2536.39--$100,000-999,999 00-02536.397265.26$1,000,000+ ----2536.39--$National Totals 3852-9122570,276.95$TNCWS<100 607-672530.721,67651,490.95$100-499 293-322530.7280324,673.59$500-999 51-62530.721414,327.70$1,000-3,299 60-62530.721624,975.03$3,300-9,999 20-22536.39451,636.89$10,000-49,999 40-42536.39913,316.95$50,000-99,999 ----2536.39--$100,000-999,999 00-02536.397270.21$1,000,000+ 10-12536.3915540.04$National Totals 10711-11822591,231.35$Grand Totals 1,03827741,3206751,123,770.51$Notes:Detail may not add exactly to totals due to independent rounding.UV stands for ultraviolet disinfection and MF/UF stands for microfiltration/ultrafiltration.Sources:(A) - (C) From Appendix G of the Economic Analysis for the LT2ESWTR.(E) Burden estimates take into account the results of February 2008 consultations with water industry representatives.(G) For systems serving up to 3,300 people, the full technical rate was applied. For systems serving more than 3,300 people, costsare based on an 80%/20% split between technical and managerial rates. Technical rates are from BLS (2006), adjusted to $2007.Managerial rates are based on Labor Costs for National Drinking Water Rules (USEPA, 2003), inflated to $2007.Exhibit F-B.12 Plant Burden and Cost for Disinfection Benchmarking ReportsThis ICR only characterizes burden and costs associated with systems complying with LT2ESWTR. Estimates of disinfection andprofiling burden and costs associated with systems changing treatment to comply with Stage 2 DBPR are not yet available; they falloutside of the clearance period and will be added in future ICRs.Microbial Rules ICR - LT2ESWTRF-B-14July 2008System Size(PopulationServed)Numberof PlantsInstallingUVNumber ofPlantsInstallingMF/UFNumber ofPlantsInstallingOzoneTotalNumber ofPlantsChangingDisinfectionLabor Hoursper Plant Labor RateTotal LaborHours Total CostsAB CD = A + B +C E F G = D*E H = F*G<100 8588-1731642.80$ 2,765.73$ 118,370.97$100-499 7968-1471642.80$ 2,358.26$ 100,931.39$500-999 32370691642.80$ 1,105.25$ 47,303.67$1,000-3,299 1252711541642.80$ 2,458.10$ 105,204.33$3,300-9,999 1162311401642.80$ 2,239.33$ 95,841.41$10,000-49,999 3662213881642.80$ 6,213.47$ 265,931.09$50,000-99,999 100501061642.80$ 1,688.52$ 72,267.25$100,000-999,999 115601211642.80$ 1,937.34$ 82,916.48$1,000,000+ 211-221642.80$ 351.04$ 15,024.06$National Totals 1,03827741,320144385.19$ 903,790.64$Notes:Detail may not add exactly to totals due to independent rounding.UV stands for ultraviolet disinfection and MF/UF stands for microfiltration/ultrafiltration.Sources:(A) - (C) From Appendix G of the Economic Analysis for the LT2ESWTR.(E) Burden estimates take into account the results of February 2008 consultations with water industry representatives.(F) Based on 2006 BLS rates for state employees, updated to $2007.Exhibit F-B.13 State Burden and Cost for Disinfection Benchmarking ReportsThis ICR only characterizes burden and costs associated with systems complying with LT2ESWTR. Estimates of disinfection and profilingburden and costs associated with systems changing treatment to comply with Stage 2 DBPR are not yet available; they fall outside of theclearance period and will be added in future ICRs.Microbial Rules ICR - LT2ESWTRF-B-15July 2008Sampling Sample Analysis# ofE.coliSamplesHoursperSampleCost perLaborHourTotalSamplingLabor CostCommercialAnalysis(IncludesShipping)UtilityAnalysisHours perSample(Labor)UtilityAnalysisCost perSample(O&M)UtilityAnalysisCost perSample(Total)PercentUtilities withE. coliAnalysisCapabilitiesTotal LaboratoryAnalysis Cost(Labor)Total LaboratoryAnalysis Cost(O&M)A B C D E = A*B*C*D F G H=I-G*D I J K = D*G*J*A*BL = F*A*B*(1-J)+H*A*B*J M = E+K+LN = A*B*C+A*B*G*J O = N/2,080 P = A*BCWSs<100 33626 130.72$ 268,224$ 87.49$ 0.17 21.13$ 26.25$ 25% 11,176.00$ 619,076$ 898,476$ 9,0964.48,732100-499 55826 130.72$ 445,940$ 87.49$ 0.17 21.13$ 26.25$ 25% 18,580.85$ 1,029,255$ 1,493,776$ 15,1227.314,518500-999 32126 130.72$ 256,283$ 87.49$ 0.17 21.13$ 26.25$ 25% 10,678.46$ 591,515$ 858,477$ 8,6914.28,3431,000-3,299 82426 130.72$ 658,477$ 87.49$ 0.17 21.13$ 26.25$ 25% 27,436.52$ 1,519,800$ 2,205,713$ 22,33010.721,4373,300-9,999 89026 130.72$ 710,669$ 87.49$ 0.17 21.13$ 26.25$ 25% 29,611.20$ 1,640,263$ 2,380,543$ 24,10011.623,13610,000-49,999 71524 130.72$ 526,776$ 87.49$ 0.17 21.13$ 26.25$ 75% 65,846.97$ 646,812$ 1,239,435$ 19,2939.317,14950,000-99,999 16124 130.72$ 118,991$ 87.49$ 0.17 21.13$ 26.25$ 75% 14,873.83$ 146,105$ 279,970$ 4,3582.13,874100,000-999,999 25424 130.72$ 187,399$ 87.49$ 0.17 21.13$ 26.25$ 100% 31,233.15$ 128,889$ 347,521$ 7,1183.46,1011,000,000+ 1624 130.72$ 11,612$ 87.49$ 0.17 21.13$ 26.25$ 100% 1,935.39$ 7,987$ 21,534$ 4410.2378National Totals4,0753,184,370$211,372$ 6,329,702$ 9,725,444$ 110,54853.1103,667NTNCWSs<100 9926 130.72$ 79,209$ 87.49$ 0.17 21.13$ 26.25$ 25% 3,300.38$ 182,819$ 265,328$ 2,6861.32,579100-499 12626 130.72$ 100,730$ 87.49$ 0.17 21.13$ 26.25$ 25% 4,197.10$ 232,491$ 337,419$ 3,4161.63,279500-999 5126 130.72$ 40,837$ 87.49$ 0.17 21.13$ 26.25$ 25% 1,701.53$ 94,254$ 136,792$ 1,3850.71,3291,000-3,299 2826 130.72$ 22,509$ 87.49$ 0.17 21.13$ 26.25$ 25% 937.89$ 51,953$ 75,400$ 7630.47333,300-9,999 426 130.72$ 3,414$ 87.49$ 0.17 21.13$ 26.25$ 25% 142.26$ 7,880$ 11,436$ 1160.111110,000-49,999 124 130.72$ 1,049$ 87.49$ 0.17 21.13$ 26.25$ 75% 131.11$ 1,288$ 2,468$ 380.03450,000-99,999 -24 130.72$ -$ 87.49$ 0.17 21.13$ 26.25$ 75% -$ -$ -$ ---100,000-999,999 -24 130.72$ -$ 87.49$ 0.17 21.13$ 26.25$ 100% -$ -$ -$ ---1,000,000+ -24 130.72$ -$ 87.49$ 0.17 21.13$ 26.25$ 100% -$ -$ -$ ---National Totals310247,749$10,410$ 570,685$ 828,844$ 8,4044.08,065TNCWSs<100 60326 130.72$ 481,287$ 87.49$ 0.17 21.13$ 26.25$ 25% 20,053.64$ 1,110,838$ 1,612,179$ 16,3217.815,668100-499 35526 130.72$ 283,733$ 87.49$ 0.17 21.13$ 26.25$ 25% 11,822.20$ 654,871$ 950,426$ 9,6224.69,237500-999 5926 130.72$ 46,908$ 87.49$ 0.17 21.13$ 26.25$ 25% 1,954.51$ 108,267$ 157,130$ 1,5910.81,5271,000-3,299 4026 130.72$ 31,743$ 87.49$ 0.17 21.13$ 26.25$ 25% 1,322.61$ 73,264$ 106,329$ 1,0760.51,0333,300-9,999 1726 130.72$ 13,872$ 87.49$ 0.17 21.13$ 26.25$ 25% 578.01$ 32,018$ 46,468$ 4700.245210,000-49,999 124 130.72$ 1,026$ 87.49$ 0.17 21.13$ 26.25$ 75% 128.31$ 1,260$ 2,415$ 380.03350,000-99,999 -24 130.72$ -$ 87.49$ 0.17 21.13$ 26.25$ 75% -$ -$ -$ ---100,000-999,999 124 130.72$ 628$ 87.49$ 0.17 21.13$ 26.25$ 100% 104.62$ 432$ 1,164$ 240.0201,000,000+ -24 130.72$ -$ 87.49$ 0.17 21.13$ 26.25$ 100% -$ -$ -$ ---National Totals1,076859,198$35,964$ 1,980,949$ 2,876,111$ 29,14214.027,971Grand Totals 5,4624,291,317$257,747$ 8,881,336$ 13,430,399$ 148,09571.2139,704Notes:Detail may not add exactly to totals due to independent rounding.Sources:(A) Taken from Exhibit F-B.1, column I.(B) Bi-weekly source water monitoring for one year for small systems and monthly samples for 24 months for medium and large systems.(C) Estimate of labor for collecting sample and shipping; estimate takes into account the results of February 2008 consultationwith water industry representatives.(D) All size categories were assumed to use a technical rate from 2006 BLS rates for operators, adjusted to $2007.(F) DynCorp study, Kevin Connell, June 2002.(G) Estimate takes into account results of February 2008 consultation with water industry representatives.(H) The amount left over after the cost of labor is subtracted from the cost of utility analysis provided in Column I.(I) DynCorp study, Kevin Connell, December 2000.(J) Estimate based on Third Edition Baseline Handbook data.Exhibit F-B.14 Burden and Cost to Plants Associated with E. coli Monitoring for Bin ReclassificationTotalBurden(FTEs) ResponsesSystem Size(PopulationServed)Baseline #of PlantsConductingE. coliMonitoringTotal CostTotalBurden(Hours)Microbial Rules ICR - LT2ESWTRF-B-16July 2008Sampling Sample Analysis# ofCryptosporidiumSamplesHours perSampleCost perLabor HourTotalSamplingLabor CostCost perSampleTotal LaboratoryAnalysis Cost(O&M)A B C D E = A*B*C*D F G = A*B*F H = E+G I = A*B*CJ =I/2080 K = A*BCWSs<100 11726 1.3830.72$ 128,345$ 661.78$ 662$ 129,007$ 4,1782.03,039100-499 19426 1.3830.72$ 213,382$ 661.78$ 3,343,385$ 3,556,768$ 6,9473.35,052500-999 11226 1.3830.72$ 122,631$ 661.78$ 1,921,452$ 2,044,083$ 3,9921.92,9031,000-3,299 28726 1.3830.72$ 315,081$ 661.78$ 4,936,850$ 5,251,931$ 10,2574.97,4603,300-9,999 31026 1.3830.72$ 340,055$ 661.78$ 5,328,156$ 5,668,211$ 11,0705.38,05110,000-49,999 71526 1.3830.72$ 784,676$ 661.78$ 12,294,711$ 13,079,387$ 25,54512.318,57850,000-99,999 16126 1.3830.72$ 177,246$ 661.78$ 2,777,188$ 2,954,435$ 5,7702.84,197100,000-999,999 25426 1.3830.72$ 279,146$ 661.78$ 4,373,806$ 4,652,952$ 9,0884.46,6091,000,000+ 1626 1.3830.72$ 17,298$ 661.78$ 271,027$ 288,325$ 5630.3410National Totals2,1652,377,862$ 35,247,238$ 37,625,100$ 77,41137.256,299NTNCWSs<100 3526 1.3830.72$ 37,902$ 661.78$ 593,860$ 631,762$ 1,2340.6897100-499 4426 1.3830.72$ 48,200$ 661.78$ 755,215$ 803,414$ 1,5690.81,141500-999 1826 1.3830.72$ 19,540$ 661.78$ 306,169$ 325,710$ 6360.34631,000-3,299 1026 1.3830.72$ 10,771$ 661.78$ 168,762$ 179,533$ 3510.22553,300-9,999 126 1.3830.72$ 1,634$ 661.78$ 25,597$ 27,231$ 530.03910,000-49,999 126 1.3830.72$ 1,562$ 661.78$ 24,481$ 26,043$ 510.03750,000-99,999 -26 1.3830.72$ -$ 661.78$ -$ -$ ---100,000-999,999 -26 1.3830.72$ -$ 661.78$ -$ -$ ---1,000,000+ -26 1.3830.72$ -$ 661.78$ -$ -$ ---National Totals109119,608$ 1,874,084$ 1,993,693$ 3,8941.92,832TNCWSs<100 21026 1.3830.72$ 230,296$ 661.78$ 3,608,396$ 3,838,692$ 7,4973.65,453100-499 12426 1.3830.72$ 135,766$ 661.78$ 2,127,253$ 2,263,019$ 4,4202.13,214500-999 2026 1.3830.72$ 22,446$ 661.78$ 351,689$ 374,135$ 7310.45311,000-3,299 1426 1.3830.72$ 15,189$ 661.78$ 237,987$ 253,176$ 4940.23603,300-9,999 626 1.3830.72$ 6,638$ 661.78$ 104,005$ 110,643$ 2160.115710,000-49,999 126 1.3830.72$ 1,529$ 661.78$ 23,958$ 25,487$ 500.03650,000-99,999 -26 1.3830.72$ -$ 661.78$ -$ -$ ---100,000-999,999 126 1.3830.72$ 935$ 661.78$ 14,651$ 15,586$ 300.0221,000,000+ -26 1.3830.72$ -$ 661.78$ -$ -$ ---National Totals376412,799$ 6,467,940$ 6,880,738$ 13,4396.59,774Grand Totals 2,6502,910,269$ 43,589,262$ 46,499,531$ 94,74445.568,905Notes:(A) Taken from Exhibit F-B.1a, column J.(C) Estimate of labor for collecting sample and shipping; estimate takes into account the results of February 2008 consultationwith water industry representatives.(D) All size categories were assumed to use a technical rate from 2006 BLS rates for operators, adjusted to $2007.Assume unfiltered plants achieve 3 log removal due to treatment installed following initialCryptosporidiummonitoring, and are therefore exempt from futureCryptosporidiummonitoring.Exhibit F-B.15 Burden and Cost to Plants Associated with Cryptosporidium Monitoring for Bin Reclassification(B) Semimonthly source water monitoring for one year for small systems and monthly samples for 24 months for medium and large systems, plus two matrix spikesamples.(F) Taken from Exhibit F-B.1b.Detail may not add exactly to totals due to independent rounding.System Size(PopulationServed)Baseline # ofPlantsConductingCryptosporidiumMonitoringTotal CostTotalBurden(Hours)TotalBurden(FTEs) ResponsesMicrobial Rules ICR - LT2ESWTRF-B-17July 2008System Size(Population Served)Source WaterSampling Planhours per plantBin ReClassification hoursper plantHoursperPlantCost perLabor HourBaseline # ofPlantsReporting Total CostTotal Burden(Hours)Total Burden(FTEs)A B C=A+B D E F = C*D*E G = C*E H = G/2080CWSs<100 1 7 8 30.72$ 33682,530$ 2,6871.3100-499 1 7 8 30.72$ 558137,212$ 4,4672.1500-999 1 7 8 30.72$ 32178,856$ 2,5671.21,000-3,299 1 7 8 30.72$ 824202,608$ 6,5963.23,300-9,999 1 7 8 36.39$ 890259,076$ 7,1193.410,000-49,999 1 16 17 36.39$ 715442,085$ 12,1475.850,000-99,999 1 16 17 36.39$ 16199,860$ 2,7441.3100,000-999,999 10 16 26 36.39$ 254240,531$ 6,6093.21,000,000+ 10 16 26 36.39$ 1614,905$ 4100.2National Totals4,0751,557,664$ 45,34521.8NTNCWSs<100 1 7 8 30.72$ 9924,372$ 7930.4100-499 1 7 8 30.72$ 12630,994$ 1,0090.5500-999 1 7 8 30.72$ 5112,565$ 4090.21,000-3,299 1 7 8 30.72$ 286,926$ 2250.13,300-9,999 1 7 8 36.39$ 41,245$ 340.010,000-49,999 1 16 17 36.39$ 1880$ 240.050,000-99,999 1 16 17 36.39$ --$ --100,000-999,999 10 16 26 36.39$ --$ --1,000,000+ 10 16 26 36.39$ --$ --National Totals31076,982$ 2,4951.2TNCWSs<100 1 7 8 30.72$ 603148,088$ 4,8212.3100-499 1 7 8 30.72$ 35587,302$ 2,8421.4500-999 1 7 8 30.72$ 5914,433$ 4700.21,000-3,299 1 7 8 30.72$ 409,767$ 3180.23,300-9,999 1 7 8 36.39$ 175,057$ 1390.110,000-49,999 1 16 17 36.39$ 1861$ 240.050,000-99,999 1 16 17 36.39$ --$ --100,000-999,999 10 16 26 36.39$ 1806$ 220.01,000,000+ 10 16 26 36.39$ --$ --National Totals1,076266,315$ 8,6364.2Grand Totals5,4621,900,962$ 56,47727.2SourcesAssume unfiltered plants achieve 3 log removal due to treatment installed following initialCryptosporidiummonitoring, and are therefore exempt from futureCryptosporidiummonitoring.Exhibit F-B.16 Burden and Cost to Plants Associated with Reporting for Source Water Sampling Schedule and Bin Re-ClassificationMonitoring(A), (B) Based on the results of February 2008 consultation with water system industry representatives.(E) Taken from Exhibit F-B.1, column I.(D) For systems serving up to 3,300 people, the full technical rate was applied. For systems serving more than 3,300 people, costs are based on an 80%/20%split between technical and managerial rates. Technical rates are from BLS (2006), adjusted to $2007. Managerial rates are based on Labor Costs for NationalDrinking Water Rules (USEPA, 2003), inflated to $2007.Microbial Rules ICR - LT2ESWTRF-B-18July 2008Exhibit F-C.1 12-Year Summary of Burden Associated with Implementing the LT2ESWTR (Hours)Activity Source Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Year 4 Year 5 Year 6 Year 7 Year 8 Year 9 Year 10 Year 11 Year 12CWSsStart-up [1] Exhibit F-B.2, Column G 15,925 14,170 218,699Assessment for Binning [2]E. coliMonitoring Exhibit F-B.4, Column N 2,745 8,685 65,473 59,533CryptosporidiumMonitoring Exhibit F-B.5, Column I 3,578 11,466 26,906 19,018 21,532 21,532Reporting Exhibit F-B.6, Column G 2,602 7,254 24,754 20,102 2,499 2,499UCFWR Reporting [3] Exhibit F-B.8, Column G 334 334Technology Reporting [4]Exhibit F-B.11, Column H 8,031 21,795 42,138 50,307 61,285 64,170Disinfection Benchmarking [5]Exhibit F-B.12, Column G 973 2,195 3,153 5,798 5,798 4,825 3,603 1,322Assessment for BinReclassification [6]E. coliMonitoring Exhibit F-B.14, Column N4,869 10,781 50,405CryptosporidiumMonitoring Exhibit F-B.15, Column I6,268 14,097 14,215ReportingExhibit F-B.16, Column G4,195 7,918 18,477Yearly Total 25,185 41,910 335,833 99,626 26,226 27,184 13,829 27,593 46,963 69,242 95,404 147,268NTNCWSsStart-up [1] Exhibit F-B.2, Column G - - 18,862Assessment for Binning [2]E. coliMonitoring Exhibit F-B.4, Column N 0 0 4,925 4,925CryptosporidiumMonitoring Exhibit F-B.5, Column I 0 0 37 37 2,250 2,250Reporting Exhibit F-B.6, Column G 0 0 1,211 1,211 253 253UCFWR Reporting [3] Exhibit F-B.8, Column GTechnology Reporting [4] Exhibit F-B.11, Column H 11 55 2,216 2,768 4,377 4,911Disinfection Benchmarking [5] Exhibit F-B.12, Column G 1 5 9 498 498 497 493 245Assessment for BinReclassification [6]E. coliMonitoring Exhibit F-B.14, Column N0 10 4,202CryptosporidiumMonitoring Exhibit F-B.15, Column I0 13 25Reporting Exhibit F-B.16, Column G0 6 1,248Yearly Totals 0 0 25,035 6,175 2,508 2,512 509 553 2,712 3,261 4,650 10,386TNCWSsStart-up [1] Exhibit F-B.2, Column G 65 - 56,917Assessment for Binning [2]E. coliMonitoring Exhibit F-B.4, Column N 7 14 15,422 15,415CryptosporidiumMonitoring Exhibit F-B.5, Column I 9 18 45 36 7,069 7,069Reporting Exhibit F-B.6, Column G 7 13 3,773 3,767 795 795UCFWR Reporting [3] Exhibit F-B.8, Column GTechnology Reporting [4] Exhibit F-B.11, Column H 32 143 2,923 3,646 5,703 6,382Disinfection Benchmarking [5] Exhibit F-B.12, Column G 4 14 23 645 645 640 631 311Assessment for BinReclassification [6]E. coliMonitoring Exhibit F-B.14, Column N12 21 14,559CryptosporidiumMonitoring Exhibit F-B.15, Column I15 28 25Reporting Exhibit F-B.16, Column G11 17 4,307Yearly Totals 87 45 76,157 19,222 7,878 7,887 677 787 3,563 4,315 6,080 25,273States and TerritoriesStart-up [7]Exhibit F-B.2, Column E,and Exhibit F-B.3, ColumnC 13,083 11,594 313,219Bin Determination andReviewing Monitoring Data[8]Exhibit F-B.7, Column B,Column D 50,38850,38838,53238,532 11,273 25,364 77,078Reviewing/Approving UCFWRSchedule [9] Exhibit F-B.9, Column C 51 51Technology Reporting [10] Exhibit F-B.10, Column H 5,382 14,662 31,518 37,813 47,577 50,309Disinfection Benchmarking [11] Exhibit F-B.13, Column G 6271417 2038 4442 4442 3815 3025 1202Yearly Totals 13,083 11,644 363,658 51,015 39,949 40,570 9,824 19,104 35,333 52,112 74,143 127,386Grand Totals 38,355 53,599 800,683 176,038 76,561 78,153 24,839 48,038 88,572 128,929 180,278 310,314Notes:[11] State activities will parallel system activities.[9] State activities associated with uncovered finished water reservoirs are assumed to have been completed during Years 2-3.This ICR only characterizes burden associated with systems complying with LT2ESWTR. Estimates of disinfection and profiling burden associated with systems changingtreatment to comply with Stage 2 DBPR are not yet available; they fall outside of the clearance period and will be added in future ICRs.[1] Start-up burden is assumed to have been completed in Years 1-3.[2] Half ofE. colimonitoring by systems serving up to 49,999 people will be completed in Year 4 (the other half was completed in Year 3). Half ofCryptosporidiummonitoringby systems serving 10,000-49,999 people will be completed in Year 4 (the other half was completed in Year 3).Cryptosporidiummonitoring for systems serving <10,000people will be completed in Years 5 and 6 (for those systems that are triggered intoCryptosporidiummonitoring based onE. coliresults).[6] Assessments for re-binning: A second round ofE. coliandCryptosporidiummonitoring for re-binning will take place starting 6.5 years after the completion of initial[3] Activities associated with uncovered finished water reservoirs are assumed to have been completed in Years 1-3.[10] State activities will parallel system activities.[4] Systems must begin to demonstrate compliance with technologies 42 months following the completion ofCryptosporidiummonitoring.[7] State rule start-up activities will parallel system activities.[8] In the first round of monitoring, States will perform these activities for small systems only; States will perform these activities for all systems duringfuture monitoring.[5] Disinfection profiling must be completed prior to changing the disinfection process. Thus, the schedule reflects treatmentinstallation.Microbial Rules ICR - LT2ESWTRF-C-1July 2008Exhibit F-C.2 12-Year Summary of Cost Associated with Implementing the LT2ESWTRActivity Source Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Year 4 Year 5 Year 6 Year 7 Year 8 Year 9 Year 10 Year 11 Year 12CWSsStart-up [1] Exhibit F-B.2, Column F 579,568 515,697 7,276,176Assessment for Binning [2]E. coliMonitoring Exhibit F-B.4, Column M 134,032 473,325 5,731,043 5,391,751CryptosporidiumMonitoring Exhibit F-B.5, Column H 1,832,079 5,870,845 13,776,390 9,737,625 11,024,642 11,024,642Reporting Exhibit F-B.6, Column F 94,708 264,003 856,908 687,614 81,096 81,096UCFWR Reporting [3] Exhibit F-B.8, Column F 12,090 12,090Technology Reporting [4] Exhibit F-B.11, Column I292,269 793,217 1,486,534 1,772,058 2,136,314 2,229,566Disinfection Benchmarking [5] Exhibit F-B.12, Column H 35,412 79,878 114,743 200,223 200,223 164,811 120,345 42,740Assessment for BinReclassification [6]E. coliMonitoring Exhibit F-B.14, Column M254,520 634,371 4,608,202CryptosporidiumMonitoring Exhibit F-B.15, Column H3,209,247 7,217,703 7,278,302Reporting Exhibit F-B.16, Column F152,683 288,169 626,149Yearly Total 2,652,478$ 7,135,959$ 27,640,517$ 15,852,402$ 11,185,616$ 11,220,480$ 492,493$ 993,440$ 1,651,345$ 5,508,854$ 10,319,298$ 14,742,220$NTNCWSsStart-up [1] Exhibit F-B.2, Column F - - 581,393Assessment for Binning [2]E. coliMonitoring Exhibit F-B.4, Column M 0 0 485,541 485,541CryptosporidiumMonitoring Exhibit F-B.5, Column H 0 0 19,106 19,106 1,151,790 1,151,790Reporting Exhibit F-B.6, Column F 0 0 37,394 37,394 7,795 7,795UCFWR Reporting [3] Exhibit F-B.8, Column FTechnology Reporting [4] Exhibit F-B.11, Column I386 2,010 68,866 86,004 135,758 152,232Disinfection Benchmarking [5] Exhibit F-B.12, Column H 53 190 327 15,428 15,428 15,375 15,238 7,551Assessment for BinReclassification [6]E. coliMonitoring Exhibit F-B.14, Column M0 617 414,422CryptosporidiumMonitoring Exhibit F-B.15, Column H0 6,511 13,021Reporting Exhibit F-B.16, Column F0 220 38,491Yearly Totals -$ -$ 1,123,434$ 542,094$ 1,159,775$ 1,159,912$ 15,814$ 17,438$ 84,241$ 101,242$ 150,657$ 618,167$TNCWSsStart-up [1] Exhibit F-B.2, Column F 2,366 - 1,754,346Assessment for Binning [2]E. coliMonitoring Exhibit F-B.4, Column M 342 684 1,522,072 1,521,731CryptosporidiumMonitoring Exhibit F-B.5, Column H 4,576 9,152 22,881 18,304 3,619,199 3,619,199Reporting Exhibit F-B.6, Column F 237 473 116,402 116,165 24,510 24,510UCFWR Reporting [3] Exhibit F-B.8, Column FTechnology Reporting [4] Exhibit F-B.11, Column I1,176 5,189 91,212 113,726 177,246 198,151Disinfection Benchmarking [5] Exhibit F-B.12, Column H 162 494 825 19,988 19,988 19,826 19,495 9,581Assessment for BinReclassification [6]E. coliMonitoring Exhibit F-B.14, Column M582 1,186 1,437,473CryptosporidiumMonitoring Exhibit F-B.15, Column H7,793 14,165 12,743Reporting Exhibit F-B.16, Column F403 618 132,755Yearly Totals 7,520$ 10,309$ 3,415,700$ 1,656,362$ 3,644,203$ 3,644,534$ 21,164$ 25,177$ 111,038$ 141,999$ 202,796$ 1,781,123$States and TerritoriesStart-up [7]Exhibit F-B.2, Column E,Exhibit F-B.3, Column D 559,933 496,200 13,405,515Bin Determination andReviewing Monitoring Data [8] Exhibit F-B.7, Column G,Column I -$ -$ 2,156,562$ 2,156,562$ 1,649,135$ 1,649,135$ -$ -$ -$ 482,475$ 1,085,575$ 3,298,852$Reviewing/Approving UCFWRSchedule [9] Exhibit F-B.9, Column D 2,167$ 2,167$Technology Reporting [10] Exhibit F-B.10, Column I230,365 627,529 1,348,942 1,618,380 2,036,259 2,153,172Disinfection Benchmarking [11] Exhibit F-B.13, Column H 26,81560635 87228 190111 190111 163296 129476 51442Yearly Totals 559,933$ 498,367$ 15,564,244$ 2,183,376$ 1,709,770$ 1,736,363$ 420,476$ 817,640$ 1,512,238$ 2,230,332$ 3,173,276$ 5,452,024$Grand Totals 3,219,930$ 7,644,635$ 47,743,895$ 20,234,234$ 17,699,364$ 17,761,290$ 949,947$ 1,853,695$ 3,358,863$ 7,982,427$ 13,846,027$ 22,593,534$Notes:[11] State activities will parallel system activities.[9] States are assumed to have completed review of uncovered finished water reservoir reports during Years 2-3.[10] State activities will parallel system activities.[8] In the first round of monitoring, States will perform these activities for small systems only; States will perform these activities for all systems during future monitoring.[5] Disinfection profiling must be completed prior to changing the disinfection process. Thus, the schedule reflects treatmentinstallation.[7] State rule start-up activities will parallel system activities.[4] Systems must begin to demonstrate compliance with technologies 42 months following the completion ofCryptosporidiummonitoring.[2] Assessments for binning: half ofE. colimonitoring by systems serving up to 49,999 people will be completed in Year 4 (the other half was completed in Year 3). Half ofCryptosporidiummonitoring by systems serving 10,000-49,999people will be completed in Year 4 (the other half was completed in Year 3).Cryptosporidiummonitoring for systems serving <10,000 people will be completed in Years 5 and 6 (for those systems that are triggered intoCryptosporidiummonitoring based onE. coliresults).[6] Assessments for re-binning: A second round ofE. coliandCryptosporidiummonitoring for re-binning will take place starting 6.5 years after the completion of initial monitoring.[1] Start-up is assumed to have been completed in Years 1-3.This ICR only characterizes costs associated with systems complying with LT2ESWTR. Estimates of disinfection and profiling costs associated with systems changing treatment to comply with Stage 2 DBPR are not yet available; they falloutside of the clearance period and will be added in future ICRs.[3] Activities associated with uncovered finished water reservoirs are assumed to have been completed in Years 1-3.Microbial Rules ICR - LT2ESWTRF-C-2July 2008

# Exhibit F-C.3 Implementation Timeline for the LT2ESWTR

Systems Serving 50,000-99,999 People Systems Serving ≥ 100,000 People

Systems Serving 10,000-49,999 People

Systems Serving < 10,000 People Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Year 4 Year 5 Year 6 Year 7 Year 8 Year 9 Year 10 Year 11

Treatment Installation Possible Extension

Treatment Installation Possible Extension

Treatment Installation Possible Extension Crypto Monitoring 2 nd 

# Round Crypto Mon.

Crypto Monitoring

Crypto Monitoring 2 nd 

# Round Crypto Mon.

Treatment Installation Possible Extension Crypto Mon. (Opt) E. coli Mon. 

# Filtered Only 2 nd 

# Round Crypto Mon. Year 12 Year 13

2 nd 

# Round E. coli Mon. 

# Filtered Only 

# Systems Serving 50,000-99,999 People Systems Serving ≥ 100,000 People

Systems Serving 10,000-49,999 People

Systems Serving < 10,000 People Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Year 4 Year 5 Year 6 Year 7 Year 8 Year 9 Year 10 Year 11

Treatment Installation Possible Extension

Treatment Installation Possible Extension

Treatment Installation Possible Extension Crypto Monitoring 2 nd 

# Round Crypto Mon.

Crypto Monitoring

Crypto Monitoring 2 nd 

# Round Crypto Mon.

Treatment Installation Possible Extension Crypto Mon. (Opt) E. coli Mon. 

# Filtered Only 2 nd 

# Round Crypto Mon. Year 12 Year 13

2 nd 

# Round E. coli Mon. 

# Filtered Only

Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Year 4 Year 5 Year 6 Year 7 Year 8 Year 9 Year 10 Year 11 Year 12 Year 13



# Microbial Rules ICR - LT2ESWTR F-C-3 July 2008

# 2004 Burden Task System Siz e Revised Burden

4 hrs Read 35 hrs

4 hrs Train ≤ 49,999 15 hrs

5 hrs Train ≥ 50,000 30 hrs

Compliance plannin g - eval of treatment

alternatives (task added by commenter) >50000

2004 Burden Task Revised Burden

0.5 FTE Regulation Adoption and Program

Development 1 FTE

0.25 FTE Training State Staff 0.5 FTE

0.10 FTE Updating Data Management Systems 0.25 FTE

2004 Burden Tas k Revised Burden

0.25 hr Sampling 1 hr

0.5 h r Sample Anal y si s 10 min

2004 Burden Task Revised Burden

0.5 h r Samplin g 1.375 hr s

2004 Burden Task System Siz e Revised Burden

1.0 hr Source Water Sampling Plan (Per Plant) >100,000 10 hrs

5.5 hrs Bin Classification ≤ 9,999 7 hrs

5 hrs Bin Classification ≥ 10,000 16 hrs

2004 Burden Task Revised Burden

6 hrs Reviewin g ( Per Plant ) 40 hrs

2004 Burden Task Revised Burden

36 hrs Preparin g Reports ( Per Plant ) 60 hrs



# Burden for Disinfection Benchmarking Reports

2004 Burden Task Revised Burden

4 hrs Preparin g Reports ( Per Plant ) 25 hrs



# State Burden for Disinfection Benchmarking Reports

2004 Burden Task Revised Burden

2 hrs Reviewin g Reports ( Per Plant ) 16 hrs 

# Burden for Preparing Reports Demonstrating Technology

Compliance Burden to States Associated with E. coli and Cryptosporidium

Monitoring Cryptosporidium Monitoring Burden

Burden Associated with Reporting for Source Water Sampling Plan and Initial Bin

Classification Monitoring 

# Exhibit F-D.1

Burden to PWSs Associated with Rule Start-Up Activities (Per PWS)

Burden to State Associated with Rule Start-up

E. coli Monitoring Burden (Per Sample) 

# Long Term 2 Enhanced Surface Water Treatment Rule (LT2) - Summary of Original and

Revised Burden Estimates

Assumes 25% of systems <10K, 75% of systems 10K-100K, and all system

>100K will have lab capabilities.

Microbial Rules ICR - LT2ESWTR F-D-1 July 2008

# Appendix G

Ground Water Rule SpreadsheetsExhibit G.1 Labor RatesCost Assumptions: Labor Rate ComponentsBase HourlyLabor CostECI in Year ofData ECI 20072007 LaborCostA B C D=A*(C/B)31.00$ 139.8 192.3 42.64$39.87$ 100.8 108.2 42.80$Technical Wage Rates by System Size25-100 101-500 500-3.3k 3.3k-10k 10k-100k >100kBase Wage Rate ($2006) 17.87$ 17.87$ 17.87$ 17.87$ 17.87$ 17.87$Loaded Wage Rate ($2006) 28.59$28.59$28.59$28.59$28.59$28.59$Loaded Wage Rate ($2007) 30.72$ 30.72$ 30.72$ 30.72$ 30.72$ 30.72$Source: 2006 Base Rates. Adjusted to 2007 values using ECI from www.bls.gov.Managerial and Clerical Wage Rates by System Size25-100 101-500 >500Base Manager Wage Rate ($2000) 30.77$30.77$30.77$Loaded Manager Wage Rate ($2000) 40.00$43.08$46.16$Loaded Manager Wage Rate ($2007) 51.21$ 55.16$ 59.10$Base Clerical Wage Rate ($2000) 10.61$ 10.61$ 10.61$Loaded Clerical Wage Rate ($2000) 13.79$ 14.85$ 15.92$Loaded Clerical Wage Rate ($2007) 17.95$19.33$20.72$Cost Assumptions: Estimated System Labor Costs per Hour by System Size25-100 101-500 500-3.3k 3.3-10k 10k-100k >100k30.72$ 30.72$ 30.72$ 36.39$ 36.39$ 36.39$Notes:Field EngineerLabor cost (per hour)State EmployeeCost ElementRateSystem size(C) ECI for Field Engineer from BLS (2008) for 2007 recalculated to base of 1989 = 100 (Civilian; Total compensation; Professional,specialty, and technical occupations). ECI for state employee from BLS (2008) from 2007 (State and local government; Totalcompensation; All workers, not seasonally adjusted). www.bls.gov.Source: 2000 Base rates: Labor Costs for National Drinking Water Rules (USEPA, 2003). Adjusted to 2007 valuesusing ECI recalculated to base of June 1989 = 100. For managerial rate used White Collar, Professional specialtyand technical, not seasonally adjusted. For clerical used Administrative support, including clerical.EPA estimates that systems with population greater than 3,300 use a combination of operators (technical) and engineers (managerial), with an 80/20 ratio betweenthe two, respectively.Sources: (A) Wage rates for Field Engineer (1998$) from R.S. Means, 1998. State wage (2006$) from BLS SOC Code 19-2041,"State Government - Environmental Scientists and Specialists, Including Health." Multiplied by a loading rate of 1.6 to account forbenefits.(B) ECI for Field Engineer from BLS (2008) for 1998 (Civilian; Total compensation; Professional, specialty, and technical occupations,not seasonally adjusted). ECI for state employee from BLS (2008) from 2006 (State and local government; Total compensation; Allworkers, not seasonally adjusted). www.bls.gov.RateSystem sizeCost ComponentPopulation CategoryMicrobial ICR - Ground Water RuleG - 1July 2008SystemsSystemsDisinfectingSystemsDisinfecting;4-logSystemsNotDisinfectingSystemsPerformingSanitarySurveyAB C D=A-BECommunity Water Systems (CWSs)<100 12,1346,4072,8775,72712,134101-500 14,12010,9995,3533,12114,120501-1,000 4,5113,7891,7627224,5111,001-3,300 5,9154,7142,2181,2015,9153,301-10K 3,0392,6381,1614013,03910,001-50K 1,5301,476727541,53050,001-100K 1831585625183100,001-1 Million 116112504116333-3Totals 41,54930,29614,20611,25441,549Nontransient Noncommunity Water Systems (NTNCWSs)<100 8,8732,5737986,3008,873101-500 6,6661,9335994,7336,666501-1,000 1,7415051571,2361,7411,001-3,300 765222695437653,301-10K 1002997110010,001-50K 1541111550,001-100K -----100,001-1 Million ----------Totals 18,1605,2661,63312,89418,160Transient Noncommunity Water Systems (TNCWSs)<100 60,80010,9441,09449,85660,800101-500 19,3603,48534815,87519,360501-1,000 1,999360361,6391,9991,001-3,300 614111115036143,301-10K 80141668010,001-50K 9207950,001-100K 31023100,001-1 Million 10011-----Totals 82,86614,9161,49267,95082,866Total All Systems 142,57550,47817,33092,098142,575Notes: Detail may not add to totals due to independent rounding.Sources: (A) Number of systems from SDWIS (USEPA, 2007).(E) Based on rule requirements, all systems are subject to sanitary surveys.Exhibit G.2 Number of Systems Subject to Sanitary Surveys(C) Percentage of systems disinfecting to 4-log taken from Chapter 4, Exhibits 4.2 and 4.3 of the GWR EA,respectively. Systems disinfecting to 4-log based on 4-log percentages for entry points -- system level dataon 4-log disinfection is not available.System Size(Population Served)> 1 Million> 1 Million> 1 Million(B) column (A) times percent disinfecting. Percent disinfecting from Third Edition of the Baseline Handbook,Table B1.3.3, except for systems serving >1 million people. The three ground water systems serving >1million people all perform disinfection.Microbial ICR - Ground Water RuleG - 2July 2008AB C=A*BDCommunity Water Systems (CWSs)<100 12,0900.38 4,57554101-500 14,5730.41 5,97573501-1,000 5,4120.49 2,678271,001-3,300 8,9180.22 1,976323,301-10K 5,9400.58 3,4423010,001-50K 4,6152.21 10,1793250,001-100K 1,4126.56 9,26211100,001-1 Million 84310.63 8,9557> 1 Million -10.63 --Totals 53,80447,043265Nontransient Noncommunity Water Systems (NTNCWSs)<100 8,0780.22 1,77029101-500 6,0650.23 1,36524501-1,000 1,5850.28 44661,001-3,300 6960.70 48943,301-10K 911.84 167110,001-50K 146.99 95050,001-100K -20.78 --100,001-1 Million -33.67 --> 1 Million -33.67 --Totals 16,5284,33264Transient Noncommunity Water Systems (TNCWSs)<100 59,7120.47 27,929297101-500 19,0080.48 9,12894501-1,000 1,9630.60 1,179101,001-3,300 6031.10 66443,301-10K 792.88 226110,001-50K 910.97 97050,001-100K 332.60 960100,001-1 Million 152.83 520> 1 Million -52.83 --Totals 81,37739,371404Grand Total 151,70990,747734Notes: Detail may not add to totals due to independent rounding.- (no PWSs of this size category).Costs of repeat samples are not included. See Chapter 6, Section 6.6 of the GWR EA for discussion.Source:Exhibit G.3 Number of Systems Subject to Triggered MonitoringSystem Size(Population Served)Entry PointsTriggeredMonitoringMeanNumberof Samplesper EP per YearTriggeredMonitoringSamples/yearAverage PositiveTriggeredMonitoringEntry Points/year(A) Number of entry points from Chapter 6, Exhibit 6.5b of the GWR EA, updated to current values by multiplyingby proportion of 2007 systems to original systems.(B) Mean triggered samples per system calculated from Chapter 6, Exhibit 6.15 of the GWR EA.(D) Values in Column D, Total systems divided by 22 years to obtain postive triggered monitoring EPs/year.Microbial ICR - Ground Water RuleG - 3July 2008Exhibit G.4 Number of Systems Subject to Compliance MonitoringA B=C+D+E C D ECommunity Water Systems (CWSs)<100 3,3734,9213,740338842101-500 5,68110,1638,564902697501-1,000 1,8304,1133,5233492411,001-3,300 2,2566,0355,3223963173,301-10K 1,1664,3673,71637227810,001-50K 7284,7654,07258011450,001-100K 56883636102145100,001-1 Million 5076761410648> 1 Million 33434--Totals 15,14336,04930,2233,1452,682Nontransient Noncommunity Water Systems (NTNCWSs)<100 1,4421,442798141504101-500 1,1251,125599117409501-1,000 294294157301071,001-3,300 1601606920713,301-10K 2323931110,001-50K 4411250,001-100K -----100,001-1 Million -----> 1 Million -----Totals 3,0483,0481,6333121,104Transient Noncommunity Water Systems (TNCWSs)<100 7,6187,6181,0941,0785,445101-500 2,4142,4143483441,722501-1,000 25025036361791,001-3,300 90901113663,301-10K 1414121010,001-50K 2200150,001-100K 11000100,001-1 Million 00000> 1 Million -----Totals 10,38910,3891,4921,4737,425Grand Total 28,58049,48733,3474,93011,210Notes: Detail may not add to totals due to independent rounding.Source: (A) Exhibit G17a, Column I(D) Chapter 6 GWR EA, Exhibit 6.5b, Column E updated using ratio of 2007 systems to original systems.(E) Chapter 6 GWR EA, Exhibit 6.5b, Column F updated using ratio of 2007 systems to original systems.(C) Number of entry points from Chapter 4, Exhibit 4.3 of the GWR EA updated to current year using ratios of2007 systems to original systems.Entry PointsCorrectedto 4-log;partiallydisinfectedEntry PointsCorrectedto 4-log;previouslynondisinfectedSystem Size(PopulationServed)SystemsSubject toComplianceMonitoringEntry PointsSubject toComplianceMonitoringEntry PointsAchieving4-log Priorto GWRMicrobial ICR - Ground Water RuleG - 4July 2008Exhibit G.5 Estimated System Burden and Costs for Start-Up ActivitiesExhibit G.5a Microbial Source Water Monitoring & Compliance Monitoring Start-Up (CWSs)Service Population Category<100 101-500 501-1,000 1,001-3,300 3,301-10,000 10,001-50,000 50,001-100,000 100,001-1,000,000 >1,000,00016 16 16 16 16 16 16 16 1616 16 16 16 16 32 32 32 3232 32 32 32 32 48 48 48 4830.72$ 30.72$ 30.72$ 30.72$ 36.39$ 36.39$ 36.39$ 36.39$ 36.39$983$ 983$ 983$ 983$ 1,165$ 1,747$ 1,747$ 1,747$ 1,747$Number of Systems 12,13414,1204,5115,9153,0391,5301831163Total labor burden 388,276451,840144,345189,28297,24073,4308,7675,56014411,926,777$ 13,879,294$ 4,433,870$ 5,814,222$ 3,538,900$ 2,672,397$ 319,056$ 202,360$ 5,241$Exhibit G.5b Microbial Source Water Monitoring & Compliance Monitoring Start-Up (NCWSs)Service Population Category<100 101-500 501-1,000 1,001-3,300 3,301-10,000 10,001-50,000 50,001-100,000 100,001-1,000,000 >1,000,0008 88 8 8 8 8 8 816 16 16 16 16 16 16 16 1624 24 24 24 24 24 24 24 2430.72$ 30.72$ 30.72$ 30.72$ 36.39$ 36.39$ 36.39$ 36.39$ 36.39$737$ 737$ 737$ 737$ 873$ 873$ 873$ 873$ 873$Number of Systems 69,67326,0263,7401,3791802431-Total labor burden 1,672,152624,62489,76033,0964,3205767224-51,363,949$ 19,186,746$ 2,757,182$ 1,016,619$ 157,220$ 20,963$ 2,620$ 873$ -$Exhibit G.5c Sanitary Survey Start-UpService Population Category<100 101-500 501-1,000 1,001-3,300 3,301-10,000 10,001-50,000 50,001-100,000 100,001-1,000,000 >1,000,0002 22 2 2 2 2 2 21 11 1 1 1 1 1 13 33 3 3 3 3 3 330.72$ 30.72$ 30.72$ 30.72$ 36.39$ 36.39$ 36.39$ 36.39$ 36.39$92$ 92$ 92$ 92$ 109$ 109$ 109$ 109$ 109$Number of Systems 81,80740,1468,2517,2943,2191,5541861173Total labor burden 245,420120,43824,75221,8829,6564,66155735197,538,629$ 3,699,527$ 760,323$ 672,161$ 351,424$ 169,645$ 20,269$ 12,757$ 328$Notes: 1) Labor hours for start-up activities reflect EPA estimate.2) Labor rates from Exhibit G.1.Total hours1Labor cost2(per hour)Total costCost ComponentRead and Understand RulePlanning and MobilizationLabor cost2(per hour)Total cost per systemCost ComponentRead and Understand RulePlanning and MobilizationTotal hours1Cost ComponentTotal cost per systemTotal cost per systemTotal costRead and Understand RulePlanning and MobilizationTotal hours1Labor cost2(per hour)Total costMicrobial ICR - Ground Water RuleG - 5July 2008Exhibit G.6 Estimated State Burden and Costs for Start-Up ActivitiesExhibit G.6a Microbial Source & Compliance Monitoring Start-UpLabor Cost(per hour) Hours FTEs CostAB C=B/2,080 D=A*B42.80$ 600.032,568$42.80$ 1,0400.5044,511$42.80$ 8000.3834,239$42.80$ 2,0801.0089,022$42.80$ 2,0801.0089,022$42.80$ 5200.2522,256$Per State Total6,580281,618$National Totals (57 States/Primacy Agencies)375,06016,052,235$Notes: Detail may not add due to independent rounding.Sources: (A) Labor rate for state employee from Exhibit G.1(B) Labor hours for start-up activities reflect EPA estimate.(C) Full-time equivalent (FTE) assumes individual working 40 hours per week, 52 weeks per year.Exhibit G.6b Annual Administrative ActivitiesLabor Cost(per hour) Hours FTEs CostA B C=B/2,080 D=A*B42.80$ 1,0400.5044,511$42.80$ 1,0400.5044,511$42.80$ 1,0400.5044,511$42.80$ 1,0400.5044,511$42.80$ 8800.4237,663$42.80$ 1040.054,451$5,144220,159$293,20812,549,042$Notes: Detail may not add due to independent rounding.Sources: (A) Labor rate for state employee from Exhibit G.1(B) Labor hours for start-up activities reflect EPA estimate.(C) Full-time equivalent (FTE) assumes individual working 40 hours per week, 52 weeks per year.Lab CertificationOngoing Technical AssistanceNational Totals (57 States/Primacy Agencies)Per State TotalSDWIS ReportingRecordkeepingStaff TrainingCompliance ActivityCoordination with EPACompliance ActivityRead and Understand RuleRegulation Adoption and Program DevelopmentInitial Laboratory CertificationModify Data Management SystemsStaff TrainingSystem Training and Technical AssistanceMicrobial ICR - Ground Water Rule G - 6 July 2008LaborCost(per hour)Review/InspectWellsReview/InspectTreatmentReview/InspectDistributionSystemReportReview andDiscussionw/ StateTotalUnit Burden(hours)Unit Cost(Full Survey)WeightedUnit Cost(Incremental Survey)A BC D EF=sum(B-E)G=A*F H=0.05*GCommunity Water Systems (CWSs)<100 30.72$ 1.1 0.8 1.2 1.1 4.3 132$ 7$101-500 30.72$ 1.2 0.8 1.2 1.1 4.3 132$ 7$501-1,000 30.72$ 1.5 1.1 1.7 1.2 5.4 167$ 8$1,001-3,300 30.72$ 2.2 1.3 2.9 1.4 7.7 237$ 12$3,301-10K 30.72$ 2.7 1.6 3.6 1.8 9.6 293$ 15$10,001-50K 30.72$ 3.7 2.0 4.3 1.9 11.8 363$ 18$50,001-100K 30.72$ 9.0 3.0 12.0 3.0 27.0 829$ 41$100,000-1M 30.72$ 15.0 8.0 24.0 3.0 50.0 1,536$ 77$>1,000,000 30.72$ 24.0 10.0 36.0 4.0 74.0 1,536$ 77$Nontransient Noncommunity Water Systems (NTNCWSs)<100 30.72$ 1.0 0.8 1.0 1.3 4.0 124$ 6$101-500 30.72$ 1.0 0.8 1.1 1.3 4.2 128$ 6$501-1,000 30.72$ 1.1 0.9 1.3 1.2 4.5 137$ 7$1,001-3,300 30.72$ 1.1 1.1 1.2 1.3 4.7 144$ 7$3,301-10K 30.72$ 1.5 1.5 1.7 1.5 6.2 189$ 9$10,001-50K 30.72$ 1.3 0.8 1.8 1.3 5.0 154$ 8$50,001-100K 30.72$ 1.5 0.8 2.3 1.3 5.8 177$ 9$100,000-1M 30.72$ 8.0 1.0 10.0 1.5 20.5 630$ 31$>1,000,000 30.72$ NA NA NA NA NA NA NATransient Noncommunity Water Systems (TNCWSs)<100 30.72$ 0.7 0.6 0.6 0.9 2.7 84$ 4$101-500 30.72$ 0.7 0.6 0.6 0.9 2.7 84$ 4$501-1,000 30.72$ 1.0 0.8 1.0 0.9 3.7 115$ 6$1,001-3,300 30.72$ 0.9 1.0 0.9 1.1 3.9 120$ 6$3,301-10K 30.72$ 1.2 1.3 1.2 1.2 4.8 148$ 7$10,001-50K 30.72$ 0.8 0.5 1.3 0.8 3.3 100$ 5$50,001-100K 30.72$ 1.3 0.5 1.3 0.8 3.8 115$ 6$100,000-1M 30.72$ 8.0 1.0 10.0 1.0 20.0 614$ 31$>1,000,000 30.72$ NA NA NA NA NA NA NANote:(D) Unit costs for NTNCWSs may be over-estimated because some of these systems may not have a distribution system.System Size(PopulationServed)Exhibit G.7a PWS Unit Burden and Cost Estimates for Performing Full and Incremental SanitarySurveys (Treatment)Weighted unit costs equal 5% of the unit costs. This factor accounts for 50% effort for an incremental survey and 10% of systems that do notalready comply with rule requirements (see Chapter 6, Sec. 6.4.2 of the GWR EA for discussion).Microbial ICR - Ground Water RuleG - 7July 2008LaborCost(per hour)Review/InspectWellsReview/InspectDistributionSystemReportReview andDiscussionw/ StateTotalUnit Burden(hours)Unit Cost(Full Survey)WeightedUnit Cost(Incremental Survey)AB C DE=sum(B-D)F=A*E G=0.05*FCommunity Water Systems (CWSs)<100 30.72$ 1.1 1.2 1.1 3.5 107$ 5$101-500 30.72$ 1.2 1.2 1.1 3.5 107$ 5$501-1,000 30.72$ 1.5 1.7 1.2 4.4 134$ 7$1,001-3,300 30.72$ 2.2 2.9 1.4 6.4 198$ 10$3,301-10K 30.72$ 2.7 3.6 1.8 8.0 245$ 12$10,001-50K 30.72$ 3.7 4.3 1.9 9.8 302$ 15$50,001-100K 30.72$ 9.0 12.0 3.0 24.0 737$ 37$100,000-1M 30.72$ 15.0 24.0 3.0 42.0 1,290$ 65$>1,000,000 30.72$ 24.0 36.0 4.0 64.0 1,290$ 65$Nontransient Noncommunity Water Systems (NTNCWSs)<100 30.72$ 1.0 1.0 1.3 3.3 101$ 5$101-500 30.72$ 1.0 1.1 1.3 3.4 105$ 5$501-1,000 30.72$ 1.1 1.3 1.2 3.6 110$ 6$1,001-3,300 30.72$ 1.1 1.2 1.3 3.6 111$ 6$3,301-10K 30.72$ 1.5 1.7 1.5 4.7 143$ 7$10,001-50K 30.72$ 1.3 1.8 1.3 4.3 131$ 7$50,001-100K 30.72$ 1.5 2.3 1.3 5.0 154$ 8$100,000-1M 30.72$ 8.0 10.0 1.5 19.5 599$ 30$>1,000,000 30.72$ NA NA NA NA NA NATransient Noncommunity Water Systems (TNCWSs)<100 30.72$ 0.7 0.6 0.9 2.2 66$ 3$101-500 30.72$ 0.7 0.6 0.9 2.2 66$ 3$501-1,000 30.72$ 1.0 1.0 0.9 2.9 89$ 4$1,001-3,300 30.72$ 0.9 0.9 1.1 2.9 89$ 4$3,301-10K 30.72$ 1.2 1.2 1.2 3.5 108$ 5$10,001-50K 30.72$ 0.8 1.3 0.8 2.8 84$ 4$50,001-100K 30.72$ 1.3 1.3 0.8 3.3 100$ 5$100,000-1M 30.72$ 8.0 10.0 1.0 19.0 584$ 29$>1,000,000 30.72$ NA NA NA NA NA NANote:(C) Unit costs for NTNCWSs may be over-estimated because some of these systems may not have a distribution system.System Size(PopulationServed)Weighted unit costs equal 5% of the unit costs. This factor accounts for 50% effort for an incremental survey and 10% of systemsthat do not already comply with rule requirements (see Chapter 6, Sec. 6.4.2 of the GWR EA for discussion).Exhibit G.7b PWS Unit Burden and Cost Estimates for Performing Full and IncrementalSanitary Surveys (No Treatment)Microbial ICR - Ground Water RuleG - 8July 2008Exhibit G.7c State Unit Burden and Cost Estimates for Performing Full and Incremental Sanitary Surveys (Treatment)LaborCost(per hour)Review/InspectWellsReview/InspectTreatmentReview/InspectDistributionSystemReportDocumentation/File ReviewReportDevelopment Data EntryReportReview andDiscussionw/ PWS TravelTotalUnit Burden(hours)Unit Cost(Full Survey)Weighted Unit Cost(Incremental Survey)A B C D EFG H IJ=sum(B-I)K=A*J L=0.05*KCommunity Water Systems (CWSs)<100 42.64$ 1.1 0.8 1.2 2.3 5.7 0.8 1.1 1.8 14.8 629$ 31$101-500 42.64$ 1.2 0.8 1.2 2.3 5.8 0.8 1.1 1.8 14.9 636$ 32$501-1,000 42.64$ 1.5 1.1 1.7 2.6 7.4 0.8 1.2 1.8 18.0 766$ 38$1,001-3,300 42.64$ 2.2 1.3 2.9 3.4 8.8 1.2 1.4 1.8 22.8 971$ 49$3,301-10K 42.64$ 2.7 1.6 3.6 3.7 9.6 1.3 1.8 1.8 25.9 1,105$ 55$10,001-50K 42.64$ 3.7 2.0 4.3 5.3 10.1 1.4 1.9 1.8 30.3 1,293$ 65$50,001-100K 42.64$ 9.0 3.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 2.0 3.0 1.8 54.8 2,335$ 117$100,000-1M 42.64$ 15.0 8.0 24.0 18.0 18.0 3.0 3.0 1.8 90.8 3,870$ 193$>1,000,000 42.64$ 24.0 10.0 36.0 18.0 18.0 4.0 4.0 1.8 115.8 3,870$ 193$Nontransient Noncommunity Water Systems (NTNCWSs)<100 42.64$ 1.0 0.8 1.0 1.9 5.1 1.0 1.3 1.8 13.8 588$ 29$101-500 42.64$ 1.0 0.8 1.1 2.0 5.3 1.0 1.3 1.8 14.2 607$ 30$501-1,000 42.64$ 1.1 0.9 1.3 2.1 6.5 0.8 1.2 1.8 15.6 666$ 33$1,001-3,300 42.64$ 1.1 1.1 1.2 2.1 6.2 0.8 1.3 1.8 15.6 663$ 33$3,301-10K 42.64$ 1.5 1.5 1.7 2.2 6.7 0.8 1.5 1.8 17.6 750$ 37$10,001-50K 42.64$ 1.3 0.8 1.8 2.5 5.0 0.8 1.3 1.8 15.0 640$ 32$50,001-100K 42.64$ 1.5 0.8 2.3 2.5 5.0 0.8 1.3 1.8 15.8 672$ 34$100,000-1M 42.64$ 8.0 1.0 10.0 8.0 10.0 1.0 1.5 1.8 41.3 1,759$ 88$>1,000,000 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA 1.8 NA NA NATransient Noncommunity Water Systems (TNCWSs)<100 42.64$ 0.7 0.6 0.6 1.5 5.1 0.8 0.9 1.8 11.9 506$ 25$101-500 42.64$ 0.7 0.6 0.6 1.5 5.3 0.8 0.9 1.8 12.1 517$ 26$501-1,000 42.64$ 1.0 0.8 1.0 1.8 5.8 0.8 0.9 1.8 13.9 591$ 30$1,001-3,300 42.64$ 0.9 1.0 0.9 1.7 4.7 0.8 1.1 1.8 12.9 548$ 27$3,301-10K 42.64$ 1.2 1.3 1.2 1.5 5.2 0.8 1.2 1.8 14.1 601$ 30$10,001-50K 42.64$ 0.8 0.5 1.3 1.3 3.8 0.8 0.8 1.8 10.8 458$ 23$50,001-100K 42.64$ 1.3 0.5 1.3 1.3 3.8 0.8 0.8 1.8 11.3 480$ 24$100,000-1M 42.64$ 8.0 1.0 10.0 3.0 8.0 0.5 1.0 1.8 33.3 1,418$ 71$>1,000,000 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA 1.8 NA NA NANote:(D) Unit costs for NTNCWSs may be over-estimated because some of these systems may not have a distribution system.System Size(PopulationServed)Weighted unit costs equal 5% of the unit costs. This factor accounts for 50% effort for an incremental survey and 10% of systems that do not already comply with rule requirements (seeChapter 6, Sec. 6.4.2 of the GWR EA for discussion).Microbial ICR - Ground Water RuleG - 9July 2008Exhibit G.7d State Unit Burden and Cost Estimates for Performing Full and Incremental Sanitary Surveys (No Treatment)LaborCost(per hour)Review/InspectWellsReview/InspectDistributionSystemReportDocumentation/File ReviewReportDevelopment Data EntryReportReview andDiscussionw/ PWS TravelTotalUnit Burden(hours)Unit Cost(Full Survey)Weighted Unit Cost(Incremental Survey)A B C DE F G HI=sum(B-H)J=A*I K=0.05*JCommunity Water Systems (CWSs)<100 42.64$ 1.1 1.2 2.3 5.7 0.8 1.1 1.8 13.9 595$ 30$101-500 42.64$ 1.2 1.2 2.3 5.8 0.8 1.1 1.8 14.1 601$ 30$501-1,000 42.64$ 1.5 1.7 2.6 7.4 0.8 1.2 1.8 16.9 720$ 36$1,001-3,300 42.64$ 2.2 2.9 3.4 8.8 1.2 1.4 1.8 21.5 916$ 46$3,301-10K 42.64$ 2.7 3.6 3.7 9.6 1.3 1.8 1.8 24.3 1,038$ 52$10,001-50K 42.64$ 3.7 4.3 5.3 10.1 1.4 1.9 1.8 28.3 1,208$ 60$50,001-100K 42.64$ 9.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 2.0 3.0 1.8 51.8 2,207$ 110$100,000-1M 42.64$ 15.0 24.0 18.0 18.0 3.0 3.0 1.8 82.8 3,529$ 176$>1,000,000 42.64$ 24.0 36.0 18.0 18.0 4.0 4.0 1.8 105.8 3,529$ 176$Nontransient Noncommunity Water Systems (NTNCWSs)<100 42.64$ 1.0 1.0 1.9 5.1 1.0 1.3 1.8 13.0 556$ 28$101-500 42.64$ 1.0 1.1 2.0 5.3 1.0 1.3 1.8 13.5 575$ 29$501-1,000 42.64$ 1.1 1.3 2.1 6.5 0.8 1.2 1.8 14.8 629$ 31$1,001-3,300 42.64$ 1.1 1.2 2.1 6.2 0.8 1.3 1.8 14.5 616$ 31$3,301-10K 42.64$ 1.5 1.7 2.2 6.7 0.8 1.5 1.8 16.1 686$ 34$10,001-50K 42.64$ 1.3 1.8 2.5 5.0 0.8 1.3 1.8 14.3 608$ 30$50,001-100K 42.64$ 1.5 2.3 2.5 5.0 0.8 1.3 1.8 15.0 640$ 32$100,000-1M 42.64$ 8.0 10.0 8.0 10.0 1.0 1.5 1.8 40.3 1,716$ 86$>1,000,000 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NATransient Noncommunity Water Systems (TNCWSs)<100 42.64$ 0.7 0.6 1.5 5.1 0.8 0.9 1.8 11.3 481$ 24$101-500 42.64$ 0.7 0.6 1.5 5.3 0.8 0.9 1.8 11.5 492$ 25$501-1,000 42.64$ 1.0 1.0 1.8 5.8 0.8 0.9 1.8 13.0 556$ 28$1,001-3,300 42.64$ 0.9 0.9 1.7 4.7 0.8 1.1 1.8 11.9 505$ 25$3,301-10K 42.64$ 1.2 1.2 1.5 5.2 0.8 1.2 1.8 12.8 544$ 27$10,001-50K 42.64$ 0.8 1.3 1.3 3.8 0.8 0.8 1.8 10.3 437$ 22$50,001-100K 42.64$ 1.3 1.3 1.3 3.8 0.8 0.8 1.8 10.8 458$ 23$100,000-1M 42.64$ 8.0 10.0 3.0 8.0 0.5 1.0 1.8 32.3 1,375$ 69$>1,000,000 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NANote:(C) Unit costs for NTNCWSs may be over-estimated because some of these systems may not have a distribution system.System Size(PopulationServed)Weighted unit costs equal 5% of the unit costs. This factor accounts for 50% effort for an incremental survey and 10% of systems that do not already comply with rule requirements(see Chapter 6, Sec. 6.4.2 of the GWR EA for discussion).Microbial ICR - Ground Water RuleG - 10July 2008Exhibit G.8 Estimated Burden and Costs for Performing Triggered MonitoringExhibit G.8a Estimated System Burden and Costs for Performing Triggered MonitoringService Population Category<100 101-500 501-1,000 1,001-3,300 3,301-10,000 10,001-50,000 50,001-100,000 100,001-1,000,000 >1,000,0000.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.530.72$ 30.72$ 30.72$ 30.72$ 30.72$ 30.72$ 30.72$ 30.72$ 30.72$15.36$ 15.36$ 15.36$ 15.36$ 15.36$ 15.36$ 15.36$ 15.36$ 15.36$71.99$ 71.99$ 71.99$ 71.99$ 71.99$ 71.99$ 71.99$ 71.99$ 71.99$0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.530.72$ 30.72$ 30.72$ 30.72$ 30.72$ 30.72$ 30.72$ 30.72$ 30.72$8.61$ 8.61$ 8.61$ 8.61$ 8.61$ 8.61$ 8.61$ 8.61$ 8.61$59.98$ 59.98$ 59.98$ 59.98$ 59.98$ 35.97$ 23.97$ 23.97$ 23.97$2.52.52.52.52.52.52.52.52.530.72$ 30.72$ 30.72$ 30.72$ 36.39$ 36.39$ 36.39$ 36.39$ 36.39$76.79$ 76.79$ 76.79$ 76.79$ 90.98$ 90.98$ 90.98$ 90.98$ 90.98$152.14$ 152.14$ 152.14$ 152.14$ 166.33$ 142.32$ 130.31$ 130.31$ 130.31$Notes: 1) Labor rates from Exhibit A.1. EPA assumes all sampling conducted by system operator.a) Total cost to system serving <10,000=.75*(Commercial analysis cost)+.25*(In-house labor*Labor cost+In-house materials cost)b) Total cost to system serving 10,001-50,000=.25(Commercial analysis cost)+.75*(In-house labor*Labor cost+In-house materials cost)c) Total cost to system serving >50,000=In-house labor*Labor cost+In-house materials cost3) Labor rates from Exhibit A.1.Exhibit G.8b Estimated State Burden and Costs for Reviewing Triggered Monitoring ReportService Population Category<100 101-500 501-1,000 1,001-3,300 3,301-10,000 10,001-50,000 50,001-100,000 100,001-1,000,000 >1,000,0003.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.542.80$ 42.80$ 42.80$ 42.80$ 42.80$ 42.80$ 42.80$ 42.80$ 42.80$149.80$ 149.80$ 149.80$ 149.80$ 149.80$ 149.80$ 149.80$ 149.80$ 149.80$Notes: 1) Labor hours for triggered monitoring report review reflect EPA estimate.2) Labor rate for state employee from Exhibit A.1.Labor cost3(per hour)Total reporting costTotal costTotal cost2) EPA assumes that 25 percent of CWSs serving less than 10,000 individuals, 75 percent of systems serving 10,000 to 50,000 individuals, and all CWSs servingmore than 50,000 conduct in-house analysis; the remaining CWSs contract a commercial laboratory. EPA assumes all NCWSs contract a commercial laboratory.Therefore, EPA uses the following ratios to determine total cost of analysis:Cost ComponentTriggered Monitoring Review andProcessing1(hours)Labor cost2(per hour)In-house materials costTotal analysis costLaboratory Analysis2Monitoring report labor (hours)ReportingTotal sampling costCommercial analysis costIn-house labor (hours)Labor cost (per hour)Sampling labor (hours)Labor cost1(per hour)Cost ComponentSamplingMicrobial ICR - Ground Water RuleG - 11July 2008Exhibit G.9 Estimated Burden & Costs for Corrective Action PlansExhibit G.9a Estimated System Burden and Costs for Corrective Action PlansService Population Category<100 101-500 501-1,000 1,001-3,300 3,301-10,000 10,001-50,000 50,001-100,000 100,001-1,000,000 >1,000,00030.72$ 30.72$ 30.72$ 30.72$ 36.39$ 36.39$ 36.39$ 36.39$ 36.39$368.61$ 399.32$ 583.63$ 890.80$ 2,110.83$ 2,183.62$ 2,547.55$ 2,693.13$ 2,693.13$Notes: 1) Labor hours for development and submission of corrective action plan for providing 4-log disinfection reflect EPA estimate.2) Labor rates from Exhibit G.1.Exhibit G.9b Estimated State Burden and Costs for Reviewing Corrective Action PlansService Population Category<100 101-500 501-1,000 1,001-3,300 3,301-10,000 10,001-50,000 50,001-100,000 100,001-1,000,000 >1,000,00042.64$ 42.64$ 42.64$ 42.64$ 42.64$ 42.64$ 42.64$ 42.64$ 42.64$511.70$ 554.34$ 810.19$ 1,236.61$ 2,473.21$ 1,279.25$ 1,492.46$ 1,577.74$ 1,577.74$Notes: 1) Labor hours for reviewing corrective action plan for providing 4-log disinfection reflect EPA estimate.2) Labor rates for field engineer from Exhibit G.1.Unit Plan CostCost ComponentLabor cost2(per hour)58 70 7419 297460Plan Review and Processing1(hours) 12 13 19 29 30 3558Labor cost2(per hour)Unit Plan Review CostCost ComponentPlan Development andSubmission1(hours) 12 1337 37Microbial ICR - Ground Water RuleG - 12July 2008UnitCost(1998)PPI(1998)PPI(2007)UnitCost(2003)Laborburden(per day)AnnualCostFrequencyAnnualLaborBurdenAnnualTotalCostA B C D=A*(C/B) E F G=E*F H=D*E*FCompliance Monitoring Labor25-100 N/A N/A N/A 30.72$ 0.503651835,606$101-500 N/A N/A N/A 30.72$ 0.503651835,606$500-3.3k N/A N/A N/A 30.72$ 0.503651835,606$Chlorine Test Kits25-100 34.00$ 143.7161.738.26$ N/A 3.65 N/A 140$101-500 34.00$ 143.7161.738.26$ N/A 3.65 N/A 140$500-3.3k 34.00$ 143.7161.738.26$ N/A 3.65 N/A 140$Totals25-100183 5,746$101-500183 5,746$500-3.3k183 5,746$Notes: Detail may not add to totals due to independent rounding.Sources: (A) Unit cost for test kit from Products for Analysis, 1998 Hach Co. Model 2231-02. Unit cost derivation for system operatorin Chapter 6, Section 6.2.1 of the GWR EA.(B & C) Producer Price Index (PPI) Commodity Code 3500 (Finished goods less food and energy) from BLS (www.bls.gov).(D) Labor rate from Exhibit A.1.(E) Labor hours for compliance monitoring reflect EPA estimate.(F) Monitoring performed daily. New test kit needed every 100 days.Exhibit G.10b PWS Compliance Monitoring Costs for Systems Serving More than 3,300 PeopleUnitCost(1998)PPI(1998)PPI(2007)UnitCost(2001)QuantityPurchased(units;hours)TotalCostA B C D=A*(C/B) E F=D*ECapital CostsChlorine analyzer (Hach CL17) 2,375$ 121.0 113.7 2,232$ 1 2,232$Power cord 10$ 121.0 113.7 9$ 1 9$Chart recorder (Honeywell 10" round) 665$ 121.0 113.7 625$ 1 625$Installation labor (System Operator)3.3k-10k N/A N/A N/A 30.72$ 8 246$10k-100k N/A N/A N/A 30.72$ 8 246$>100k N/A N/A N/A 30.72$ 8 246$Total Capital Cost3.3k-10k3,112$10k-100k3,112$>100k3,112$Annual Operation and MaintenanceCompliance monitoring (hours/year)3.3k-10k N/A N/A N/A 30.72$ 80 2,457$10k-100k N/A N/A N/A 30.72$ 80 2,457$>100k N/A N/A N/A 30.72$ 80 2,457$Maintenance kit 140$ 143.7 161.7 158$ 1 158$Monthly reagents 18$ 143.7 161.7 20$ 12 243$Charts 15$ 143.7 161.7 17$ 1 17$Recorder pens 52$ 143.7 161.7 59$ 1 59$Total Annual Operation and Maintenance Costs3.3k-10k2,933$10k-100k2,933$>100k2,933$Notes: Detail may not add to totals due to indpendent rounding.Sources: (A) Unit costs for equipment (both capital and O&M) from Products for Analysis, 1998 Hach Co.(D) Labor rate from Exhibit G.1.ComponentComponent(B & C) Producer Price Index Commodity Code 117 (Electrical machinery and equipment) for Capital Costs and Commodity Code3500 (Finished goods less food and energy) for Annual O&M, BLS (www.bls.gov). December values.Exhibit G.10a PWS Compliance Monitoring Costs for Systems Serving 3,300 or Fewer PeopleMicrobial ICR - Ground Water RuleG - 13July 2008Exhibit G.11 Estimated Burden and Costs for Compliance MonitoringExhibit G.11a Estimated System Burden and Costs for Compliance Monitoring Initial NotificationService Population Category<100 101-500 501-1,000 1,001-3,300 3,301-10,000 10,001-50,000 50,001-100,000 100,001-1,000,000 >1,000,0000.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.530.72$ 30.72$ 30.72$ 30.72$ 30.72$ 30.72$ 30.72$ 30.72$ 30.72$15.36$ 15.36$ 15.36$ 15.36$ 15.36$ 15.36$ 15.36$ 15.36$ 15.36$Notes: 1) Labor hours for compliance monitoring initial notification reflect EPA estimate.2) Labor rates from Exhibit G.1.Exhibit G.11b Estimated State Burden and Costs for Compliance Monitoring Notification DocumentationService Population Category<100 101-500 501-1,000 1,001-3,300 3,301-10,000 10,001-50,000 50,001-100,000 100,001-1,000,000 >1,000,0000.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.542.80$ 42.80$ 42.80$ 42.80$ 42.80$ 42.80$ 42.80$ 42.80$ 42.80$21.40$ 21.40$ 21.40$ 21.40$ 21.40$ 21.40$ 21.40$ 21.40$ 21.40$Notes: 1) Labor hours for documenting compliance monitoring reflect EPA estimate.2) Labor rate for state employee from Exhibit G.1.Exhibit G.11c Estimated System Burden and Costs for Compliance Monitoring Reporting (Disinfection Failure)Service Population Category<100 101-500 501-1,000 1,001-3,300 3,301-10,000 10,001-50,000 50,001-100,000 100,001-1,000,000 >1,000,0002.5 2.5 2.5 2.5 2.5 2.5 2.5 2.5 2.530.72$ 30.72$ 30.72$ 30.72$ 30.72$ 30.72$ 30.72$ 30.72$ 30.72$76.79$ 76.79$ 76.79$ 76.79$ 76.79$ 76.79$ 76.79$ 76.79$ 76.79$Notes: 1) Labor hours for compliance monitoring reporting reflect EPA estimate.2) Labor rates from Exhibit G.1.Exhibit G.11d Estimated State Burden and Costs for Reviewing Compliance Monitoring Report (Disinfection Failure)Service Population Category<100 101-500 501-1,000 1,001-3,300 3,301-10,000 10,001-50,000 50,001-100,000 100,001-1,000,000 >1,000,0003.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.542.80$ 42.80$ 42.80$ 42.80$ 42.80$ 42.80$ 42.80$ 42.80$ 42.80$149.80$ 149.80$ 149.80$ 149.80$ 149.80$ 149.80$ 149.80$ 149.80$ 149.80$Notes: 1) Labor hours for compliance monitoring report review reflect EPA estimate.2) Labor rate for state employee from Exhibit G.1.Total costCost ComponentDocument notification1(hours)Cost ComponentNotification labor1(hours)Labor cost2(per hour)Labor cost2(per hour)Total costLabor cost2(per hour)Total costTotal costCost ComponentReview report1(hours)Labor cost2(per hour)Cost ComponentReport labor1(hours)Microbial ICR - Ground Water RuleG - 14July 2008Exhibit G.12Respondents for Full Implementation of the Rule Year by Year by ActivityPWSsRespondents Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Year 4 Year 5 Year 6 Year 7 Year 8 Year 9 Year 10Start-Up ActivitiesMicrobial & Compliance Monitor Start-Up 47,525 47,525 47,525 -------Sanitary Survey Start-Up 47,525 47,525 47,525 -------Annual ActivitiesSanitary Survey ---30,33830,33830,33830,33830,33830,33830,338Triggered Monitoring (EPs) ---6,8966,8966,8966,8966,8966,8966,896Triggered Monitoring Reporting ---734734734734734734734Corrective Action Plans (systems) - from significantdeficiences and TM---1,7021,7021,7021,7021,7021,7021,702Compliance Monitoring - Initial Notification (systems)---17,330Compliance Monitoring (EPs) ---4829641,4461,9272,4092,8913,373Compliance MonitoringReporting(Disinfection FailureReports) (EPs)---2,2782,3022,3262,3502,3742,3982,422PWSs with one/more Respondent Activities47,52547,52547,5257,3787,8608,3418,8239,3059,78710,269StatesRespondents Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Year 4 Year 5 Year 6 Year 7 Year 8 Year 9 Year 10Start-Up ActivitiesStart-Up 575757-------Annual ActivitiesSanitary Survey ---57575757575757Triggered Monitoring - Review Report ---57575757575757Correction Action - Review Plans ---57575757575757Compliance Monitoring - Notification Documentation ---57575757575757Compliance Monitoring Report Review (DisinfectionFailure)---57575757575757Annual Administration ---57575757575757Sum for PWSs and StatesYear 1 Year 2 Year 3 Year 4 Year 5 Year 6 Year 7 Year 8 Year 9 Year 10PWSs47,52547,52547,5257,3787,8608,3418,8239,3059,78710,269States and Territories57575757575757575757Yearly Total 47,58247,58247,5827,4357,9178,3988,8809,3629,84410,326Microbial ICR - Ground Water RuleG - 15July 2008Exhibit G.13Responses for Full Implementation of the Rule Year by Year by ActivityPWSsYear 1 Year 2 Year 3 Year 4 Year 5 Year 6 Year 7 Year 8 Year 9 Year 10Start-Up ActivitiesMicrobial & Compliance Monitor Start-Up 47,525 47,525 47,525 -------Sanitary Survey Start-Up 47,525 47,525 47,525 -------Annual ActivitiesSanitary Survey ---30,33830,33830,33830,33830,33830,33830,338Triggered Monitoring (samples) ---90,74790,74790,74790,74790,74790,74790,747Triggered Monitoring Reporting ---734734734734734734734Corrective Action Plans - from significant deficiencesand TM ---1,7021,7021,7021,7021,7021,7021,702Compliance Monitoring - Initial Notification ---45,076------Compliance Monitoring (samples) ---175,873351,746527,619703,492879,3651,055,2381,231,112Compliance Monitoring Reporting (DisinfectionFailure) ---2,2782,3022,3262,3502,3742,3982,422Yearly Total 95,05095,05095,050346,748477,569653,466829,3631,005,2601,181,1571,357,054StatesYear 1 Year 2 Year 3 Year 4 Year 5 Year 6 Year 7 Year 8 Year 9 Year 10Start-Up ActivitiesStart-Up 575757-------Annual ActivitiesSanitary Survey ---30,33830,33830,33830,33830,33830,33830,338Triggered Monitoring - Review Report ---734734734734734734734Corrective Action - Review Plans ---1,7021,7021,7021,7021,7021,7021,702Compliance Monitoring - Notification Documentation ---45,076------Compliance Monitoring Report Review (DisinfectionFailure) ---2,2782,3022,3262,3502,3742,3982,422Annual Administration ---57575757575757Yearly Total 57575780,18535,13335,15735,18135,20535,22935,253Sum for PWSs and StatesYear 1 Year 2 Year 3 Year 4 Year 5 Year 6 Year 7 Year 8 Year 9 Year 10PWSs95,05095,05095,050346,748477,569653,466829,3631,005,2601,181,1571,357,054States and Territories57575780,18535,13335,15735,18135,20535,22935,253Yearly Total 95,10795,10795,107426,933512,701688,622864,5441,040,4651,216,3861,392,308Microbial ICR - Ground Water RuleG - 16July 2008Exhibit G.14Burden for Full Implementation of the Rule Year by Year by ActivityPWSsYear 1 Year 2 Year 3 Year 4 Year 5 Year 6 Year 7 Year 8 Year 9 Year 10Start-Up ActivitiesMicrobial & Compliance Monitor Start-Up 1,261,169 1,261,169 1,261,169 -------Sanitary Survey Start-Up 142,575 142,575 142,575 -------Annual ActivitiesSanitary Survey ---27,65327,65327,65327,65327,65327,65327,653Triggered Monitoring ---60,63060,63060,63060,63060,63060,63060,630Triggered Monitoring Reporting ---1,8341,8341,8341,8341,8341,8341,834Corrective Action Plans ---25,58225,58225,58225,58225,58225,58225,582Compliance Monitoring - Initial Notification ---22,538------Compliance Monitoring ---87,937175,873263,810351,746439,683527,619615,556Compliance Monitoring Report (Disinfection Failure) ---5,6955,7555,8155,8755,9365,9966,056Yearly Total 1,403,7451,403,7451,403,745231,869297,328385,324473,321561,318649,315737,311StatesYear 1 Year 2 Year 3 Year 4 Year 5 Year 6 Year 7 Year 8 Year 9 Year 10Start-Up ActivitiesStart-Up 125,020 125,020 125,020 -------Annual ActivitiesSanitary Survey ---95,996 95,996 95,996 95,996 95,996 95,996 95,996Triggered Monitoring - Review Report ---2,5682,5682,5682,5682,5682,5682,568Correction Action - Review Plans ---24,908 24,908 24,908 24,908 24,908 24,908 24,908Compliance Monitoring - Notification Documentation ---22,538 ------Compliance Monitoring Report Review (DisinfectionFailure)---7,973 8,057 8,141 8,226 8,310 8,394 8,479Annual Administration ---293,208 293,208 293,208 293,208 293,208 293,208 293,208Yearly Total 125,020 125,020 125,020 447,190 424,737424,821 424,905424,990 425,074425,158Sum for PWSs and StatesYear 1 Year 2 Year 3 Year 4 Year 5 Year 6 Year 7 Year 8 Year 9 Year 10PWSs1,403,7451,403,7451,403,745231,869297,328385,324473,321561,318649,315737,311States and Territories125,020125,020125,020447,190424,737424,821424,905424,990425,074425,158Yearly Total 1,528,7651,528,7651,528,765679,059722,064810,145898,226986,3071,074,3891,162,470Microbial ICR - Ground Water RuleG - 17July 2008Exhibit G.15Costs for Full Implementation of the Rule Year by Year by ActivityPWSsYear 1 Year 2 Year 3 Year 4 Year 5 Year 6 Year 7 Year 8 Year 9 Year 10Start-Up ActivitiesMicrobial & Compliance Monitor Start-Up $39,099,430 $39,099,430 $39,099,430 -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$Sanitary Survey Start-Up $4,408,354 $4,408,354 $4,408,354 -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$Annual ActivitiesSanitary Survey -$ -$ -$ 849,417$ 849,417$ 849,417$ 849,417$ 849,417$ 849,417$ 849,417$Triggered Monitoring -$ -$ -$ 468,643$ 468,643$ 468,643$ 468,643$ 468,643$ 468,643$ 468,643$Triggered Monitoring Reporting -$ -$ -$ 465$ 465$ 465$ 465$ 465$ 465$ 465$Triggered Monitoring O&M -$ -$ -$ 5,753,522.31$ 5,753,522.31$ 5,753,522.31$ 5,753,522.31$ 5,753,522.31$ 5,753,522.31$ 5,753,522.31$Corrective Action Plans -$ -$ -$ 805,109$ 805,109$ 805,109$ 805,109$ 805,109$ 805,109$ 805,109$Compliance Monitoring - Initial Notification -$ -$ -$ 692,312$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$Compliance Monitoring -$ -$ -$ 2,701,171$ 5,402,341$ 8,103,512$ 10,804,683$ 13,505,853$ 16,207,024$ 18,908,195$Compliance Monitoring Report (Disinfection Failure) -$ -$ -$ 174,928$ 176,778$ 178,628$ 180,478$ 182,329$ 184,179$ 186,029$Chlorimeter Installation(Capital + O&M)-$ -$ -$ 302,080.81$ 517,937$ 733,793$ 949,650$ 1,165,506$ 1,381,362$ 1,597,219$Capital Cost-$ -$ -$ 153,512$ 220,799$ 288,086$ 355,373$ 422,660$ 489,947$ 557,234$Annual O&M-$ -$ -$ 148,569$ 297,138$ 445,708$ 594,277$ 742,846$ 891,415$ 1,039,985$Yearly Total 43,507,785$ 43,507,785$ 43,507,785$ 11,747,647$ 13,974,212$ 16,893,089$ 19,811,966$ 22,730,844$ 25,649,721$ 28,568,598$StatesYear 1 Year 2 Year 3 Year 4 Year 5 Year 6 Year 7 Year 8 Year 9 Year 10Start-Up ActivitiesStart-Up $5,350,745 $5,350,745 $5,350,745 -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$Annual ActivitiesSanitary Survey -$ -$ -$ 4,093,394$ 4,093,394$ 4,093,394$ 4,093,394$ 4,093,394$ 4,093,394$ 4,093,394$Triggered Monitoring - Review Report -$ -$ -$ 109,897$ 109,897$ 109,897$ 109,897$ 109,897$ 109,897$ 109,897$Correction Action - Review Plans -$ -$ -$ 1,062,111$ 1,062,111$ 1,062,111$ 1,062,111$ 1,062,111$ 1,062,111$ 1,062,111$Compliance Monitoring - Notification Documentation -$ -$ -$ 964,615$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$Compliance Monitoring Report Review (DisinfectionFailure)-$ -$ -$ 341,224$ 344,833$ 348,442$ 352,051$ 355,660$ 359,269$ 362,878$Annual Administration -$ -$ -$ 12,549,042$ 12,549,042$ 12,549,042$ 12,549,042$ 12,549,042$ 12,549,042$ 12,549,042$Yearly Total $5,350,745 $5,350,745 $5,350,745 $19,120,284 $18,159,278 $18,162,887 $18,166,496 $18,170,104 $18,173,713 $18,177,322Sum for PWSs and StatesYear 1 Year 2 Year 3 Year 4 Year 5 Year 6 Year 7 Year 8 Year 9 Year 10PWSs43,507,785$ 43,507,785$ 43,507,785$ 11,747,647$ 13,974,212$ 16,893,089$ 19,811,966$ 22,730,844$ 25,649,721$ 28,568,598$States and Territories5,350,745$ 5,350,745$ 5,350,745$ 19,120,284$ 18,159,278$ 18,162,887$ 18,166,496$ 18,170,104$ 18,173,713$ 18,177,322$Yearly Total 48,858,529$ 48,858,529$ 48,858,529$ 30,867,931$ 32,133,490$ 35,055,976$ 37,978,462$ 40,900,948$ 43,823,434$ 46,745,920$Microbial ICR - Ground Water RuleG - 18July 2008Exhibit G.16ResponsesBurdenHours Labor CostsO&MCostsCapitalCostsTotal AnnualCostsPWSs 274,772 176,399 8,573,953 148,569 124,770 8,573,953States and Territories 38,439 290,642 12,426,520 0 0 12,426,520Total 313,211 467,041 21,000,474 148,569 124,770 21,000,474Note: Annual average burden and costs represent burden and costs for years 4 and 5 divided overthe 3 year evaluation period. Year 3, which corresponds to the first year of the renewal ICRevaluation period, is covered under the stand-alone GWR ICR.Average Annual Burden per Repsonse and per Respondent and AverageAnnual Responses per RespondentMicrobial ICR - Ground Water RuleG - 19July 2008Exhibit G.17a - Number of Systems and Entry Points Subject to GWR RequirementsA B C D=A E=0 F=A-C G HIJ KL MCommunity Water Systems (CWSs)<10012,1346,4072,87712,1340 9,256-2,969 3,373 -12,090-4,385101-500 14,12010,9995,35314,1200 8,767-3,402 5,681 -14,573-9,090501-1,000 4,5113,7891,7624,5110 2,749-1,061 1,830 -5,412-3,6601,001-3,300 5,9154,7142,2185,9150 3,697-1,299 2,256 -8,918-5,4143,301-10K 3,0392,6381,1613,0390 1,877-722 1,166 -5,940-3,73010,001-50K 1,5301,4767271,5300 803-383 728 -4,615-4,07450,001-100K 183158561830 126-53 56 -1,412-636100,001-1 Million 116112501160 66-32 50 -843-614> 1 Million 33330 --0 3 ---34Totals 41,54930,29614,20641,549-27,343-9,92115,143-53,804-31,639Nontransient Noncommunity Water Systems (NTNCWSs)<1008,8732,5737988,8730 8,075-2,154 1,442 -8,078-1,442101-500 6,6661,9335996,6660 6,067-1,658 1,125 -6,065-1,125501-1,000 1,7415051571,7410 1,584-433 294 -1,585-2941,001-3,300 765222697650 696-221 160 -696-1603,301-10K 1002991000 91-31 23 -91-2310,001-50K 1541150 14-5 4 -14-450,001-100K ----0 --0 0 ----100,001-1 Million ----0 --0 0 ----> 1 Million ----0 --0 0 ----Totals 18,1605,2661,63318,160-16,527-4,5023,048-16,528-3,048Transient Noncommunity Water Systems (TNCWSs)<10060,80010,9441,09460,8000 59,706-16,892 7,618 -59,712-7,618101-500 19,3603,48534819,3600 19,012-5,362 2,414 -19,008-2,414501-1,000 1,999360361,9990 1,963-554 250 -1,963-2501,001-3,300 614111116140 603-183 90 -603-903,301-10K 80141800 79-26 14 -79-1410,001-50K 92090 9-3 2 -9-250,001-100K 31030 3-1 1 -3-1100,001-1 Million 10010 1-0 0 -1-0> 1 Million ----0 --0 0 ----Totals 82,86614,9161,49282,866-81,374-23,02210,389-81,377-10,389Grand Total 142,57550,47817,330142,575-125,245-37,44528,580-151,709-45,076Notes: Detail may not add to totals due to independent rounding.Sources: (A) Ground water system inventories for CWSs, NTNCWSs, and TNCWSs: SDWIS/FED Data, October 2007 (USEPA, 2007).(B) Systems peforming implementation activities multiplied by percent of systems disinfecting.(D) Based on rule requirements, all systems are subject to sanitary surveys.(F) Based on rule requirements, systems that do not achieve 4-log disinfection are subject to triggered source water monitoring.(G) Based on rule requirements, assessment monitoring is not required.(J) Number of entry points subject to HSAs from column O, Exhibit 4.3(K) Number of entry points subject to triggered monitoring is equal to number of systems subject to HSAs (column J).(L) Based on rule requirements, assessment monitoring is not required.(M) (Exhibit G.17b, Columns E+F) + (Number of Ground Water Entry Points Disinfecting to 4-Log)(E) Based on rule requirements, systems not required to perform HSAs(C) Systems disinfecting to 4-log based on 4-log percentages for entry points -- system level data on 4-log disinfection is notavailable.SystemsPerformingComplianceMonitoringSystemsPerformingImplementationActivitiesSystemsDisinfectingSystemsDisinfecting;4 logEntry PointsPerformingComplianceMonitoringSystemsSubjecttoHSAs(I) Systems treating to 4-log inactivation or removal of viruses must undergo compliance monitoring. Number of systems subjectto compliance monitoring is converted from entry points subject to compliance monitoring(column M), using entry points/system.(H) Based rule requirements, systems found to have significant deficiencies during a sanitary survey, or those that detect source water contamination, must undergo corrective action. Number of systems undergoing correctiveaction from model output.System Size(PopulationServed)Entry PointsPerformingTriggeredMonitoringEntry PointsPerformingAssessmentMonitoringSystemsPerformingCorrectiveActionSystemsPerformingTriggeredMonitoringSystemsReceiving aSanitarySurveySystemsPerformingAssessmentMonitoringEntryPointsPerformingHSAsMicrobial ICR - Ground Water RuleG - 20July 2008Exhibit G.17b - Summary of Rule ImplicationsSystem SizeSystemsReceivingSanitary SurveySystems withCorrectiveActions forSignificantDeficienciesEntry Points withTriggeredMonitoringEntry PointswithCorrectiveActions forTriggeredMonitoringEntry Points with ViralDisinfection Increased fromless than 4 logs to 4 logsPreviously Nondisinfecting Entry PointsTaking Corrective ActionEntry Points withIncrementalCompliance MonitoringA B C D E F GCommunity Water Systems (CWSs)<100 12,1342,06112,0901,180338842234101-500 14,1202,40314,5731,599902697287501-1,000 4,5117665,4125903492411021,001-3,300 5,9151,0028,9187133963171303,301-10K 3,0395185,94065037227811610,001-50K 1,5302594,6156945801145750,001-100K 183311,41224710214550100,001-1 Million 116208431531064823> 1 Million 3------Nontransient Noncommunity Water Systems (NTNCWSs)<100 8,8731,5098,078645141504140101-500 6,6661,1326,065526117409168501-1,000 1,7412961,58513730107461,001-3,300 765130696922071293,301-10K 100179114311410,001-50K 15314212150,001-100K -------100,001-1 Million -------> 1 Million -------Transient Noncommunity Water Systems (TNCWSs)<100 60,80010,36859,7126,5241,0785,4451,512101-500 19,3603,29719,0082,0663441,722710501-1,000 1,9993391,96321436179761,001-3,300 614104603791366273,301-10K 80147913210410,001-50K 929201150,001-100K 3131000100,001-1 Million 1010000> 1 Million -------Sources:(A) Ground water system inventories for CWSs, NTNCWSs, and TNCWSs: SDWIS/FED Data, October 2007 (USEPA, 2007).(B) - (G): Baseline information from the Final GWR EA was updated by multiplying the percentage of systems or entry points performing each rule component by column A.Notes:(G) indicates number of entry points with treatment corrective actions.(F) - (G) indicates non treatment corrective actions.Microbial ICR - Ground Water RuleG - 21July 2008Exhibit G.18Ground Water Rule - Summary of Original and Revised Burden EstimatesEstimated System Burden for Start-up Activities2004 Burden Task System Size Revised Burden1 hr Read and Understand Rule16 hrs2 hrs Planning and Mobilization≤10,00016 hrs3 hrs Planning and Mobilization >10,00032 hrs1 hr Read and Understand Rule8 hrs1 hr Planning and Mobilization 16 hrsMicrobial Source Water Monitoring & Compliance Monitoring Start-Up (CWSs)Microbial Source Water Monitoring & Compliance Monitoring Start-Up (NCWSs)Microbial ICR - Ground Water RuleG - 22July 2008