alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY HIGH

 80

 82

 86

 87

 81

 83

 84

 91

 92

 78

 90

 76

 76

 74

 92

 74

 76

 83

 82

 78

 76

 77

 76

 90

 85

 86

 71

 71

 71

 72

 73

 74

 75

 82

 80

 77

 76

 80

 74

 69

 60

 67

 72

 20

 72

 70

 69

 73

 75

 76

 39

 73

 73

 74

 74

 74

 70

 68

 68

 68

 69

 70

 76

 78

 83

 84

 78

 80

 81

 79

 74

 65

 77

 74

 72

 73

 77

 71

 74

 77

 78

 73

 74

 75

 75

 77

 77

 74

 70

 69

 69

 70

 71

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

MARCH 2021 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: April 2, 2021

HIGH LOW MEAN

 55.3

 56.4

 55.8

 56.4

 56.4

 57.4

 57.2

 56.8

 56.4

 55.2

 54.3

 56.0

 60.5

 55.8

 55.2

 56.0

 56.6

 57.8

 58.5

 59.6

 60.4

 60.4

 61.1

 60.9

 60.4

 61.0

 61.5

 63.0

 63.2

 62.7

 63.3

 51.7

 52.6

 53.5

 52.0

 52.8

 54.2

 54.0

 54.4

 53.5

 53.2

 52.2

 51.7

 53.1

 53.9

 53.2

 51.5

 53.1

 55.1

 56.5

 54.5

 55.0

 55.7

 55.8

 55.3

 56.4

 55.8

 56.2

 58.0

 59.0

 58.7

 58.4

 53.8

 54.6

 54.5

 54.3

 54.7

 55.7

 55.7

 55.5

 54.5

 54.1

 53.2

 53.9

 55.4

 55.0

 54.4

 53.7

 54.9

 56.2

 57.4

 57.1

 57.5

 57.9

 58.3

 58.1

 58.3

 58.6

 59.0

 60.5

 61.1

 60.7

 60.9

HIGH LOW MEAN

 10.8

 10.3

 10.2

 10.7

 10.8

 10.6

 10.5

 10.5

 10.7

 10.5

 10.7

 10.8

 10.7

 10.4

 10.3

 10.4

 10.2

 9.9

 9.6

 10.1

 10.2

 10.1

 9.9

 10.0

 9.9

 10.1

 10.2

 9.9

 9.7

 9.8

 9.8

 10.2

 9.7

 9.7

 9.9

 10.4

 10.2

 10.2

 10.2

 10.2

 10.2

 10.4

 10.4

 10.0

 10.0

 10.0

 9.6

 9.6

 9.3

 9.2

 9.2

 9.5

 9.4

 9.4

 9.3

 9.3

 9.4

 9.5

 9.3

 9.2

 9.2

 9.2

 10.6

 10.0

 9.9

 10.3

 10.6

 10.4

 10.3

 10.4

 10.5

 10.4

 10.5

 10.6

 10.4

 10.2

 10.1

 10.1

 9.9

 9.6

 9.4

 9.7

 9.8

 9.7

 9.6

 9.6

 9.5

 9.7

 9.8

 9.6

 9.4

 9.4

 9.5

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

RIPON ON THE STANISLAUS RIVER

 ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS WATER TEMPERATURE, DEG DISSOLVED OXYZEN, PPM
probability that, but for counsel's errors, petitioner would not have

pleaded guilty and would have insisted on going to trial. Hill v. Lockhart, 474 U.S. 52, 58-59 (1985); Kirksey v. State, 112 Nev. 980, 988, 923 P.2d 1102, 1107 (1996). Both components of the inquiry must be shown. Strickland v. Washington, 466 U.S. 668, 697 (1984).

First, appellant claimed that counsel was ineffective for failing to bring appellant's file to a hearing on appellant's motion to withdraw his plea. Appellant failed to demonstrate prejudice, as he did not show that counsel's performance subsequent to the entry of the guilty plea affected appellant's decision to plead guilty. Thus, the district court did not err in denying this claim.

Second, appellant claimed that counsel was ineffective for failing to research and understand an intoxication defense. Appellant failed to allege any specific facts to support this claim and thus failed to demonstrate deficiency or prejudice. See Hargrove v. State, 100 Nev. 498, 502, 686 P.2d 222, 225 (1984) (holding that no relief is warranted where petitioner raises "bare' or 'naked' claims for relief, unsupported by any specific factual allegations that would, if true, have entitled him to withdrawal of his plea"). Therefore, the district court did not err in denying this claim.

SUPREME COURT

OF NEVADA
(0) 1947A < 2For the reasons set forth above, we conclude that the district

court did not err in denying the petition. 2 Accordingly, we

ORDER the judgment of the district court AFFIRMED. 3

Hardesty



### at..A.A J. Parraguirre

Cherry 

# LI

2 The district court also denied the petition on the grounds that it failed to comply with the requirements of NRS 34.730 and NRS 34.735. On appeal, appellant has attempted to amend the defects in his petition. Because we conclude that the district court did not err in denying the petition on the merits, we need not address whether the petition contained pleading defects.

3 We have reviewed all documents that appellant has submitted in proper person to the clerk of this court in this matter, and we conclude that no relief based upon those submissions is warranted. To the extent that appellant has attempted to present claims or facts in those submissions which were not previously presented in the proceedings below, we have declined to consider them in the first instance. J.

SUPREME COURT

OF NEVADA
(0) 1947A 3

### cc: Hon. Michelle Leavitt, District Judge Theodore A. Pearil, III Attorney General/Carson City Clark County District Attorney Eighth District Court Clerk

SUPREME COURT

OF NEVADA 

### 4
(0) 1947A
### SUBCHAPTER IV—UNITED STATES INTERNATIONAL DEVELOPMENT COOPERATION AGENCY
#### § 320.48 Representatives of parties.

In the event a party to any proceeding within the Board, under the preceding regulations in this part, desires to be represented by another person, he shall file with the Board prior to the time of such representation a power of attorney signed by him and naming such other person as the person authorized to represent him: *Provided, however,* That without requiring such power of attorney the Board may recognize as the duly authorized representative of the claimant the person designated by the claimant's railway labor organization to act in behalf of members of that organization on such matters whenever such representative acts or appears for such claimant.
### §147. Repeal of inconsistent laws

Any laws or parts of laws inconsistent with this subchapter are repealed.

(Feb. 15, 1927, ch. 155, §7, 44 Stat. 1103.)
```

[Congressional Bills 114th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 3724 Referred in Senate (RFS)]

<DOC>
114th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 3724

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             April 25, 2016

     Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to prohibit the Commissioner 
   of the Internal Revenue Service from rehiring any employee of the 
 Internal Revenue Service who was involuntarily separated from service 
                            for misconduct.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Ensuring Integrity in the IRS 
Workforce Act of 2016''.

SEC. 2. PROHIBITION ON REHIRING ANY EMPLOYEE OF THE INTERNAL REVENUE 
              SERVICE WHO WAS INVOLUNTARILY SEPARATED FROM SERVICE FOR 
              MISCONDUCT.

    (a) In General.--Section 7804 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 
is amended by adding at the end the following new subsection:
    ``(d) Prohibition on Rehiring Employees Involuntarily Separated.--
The Commissioner may not employ any individual previously employed by 
the Commissioner who was removed for misconduct under this subchapter 
or chapter 43 or chapter 75 of title 5, United States Code, or whose 
employment was terminated under section 1203 of the Internal Revenue 
Service Restructuring and Reform Act of 1998 (26 U.S.C. 7804 note).''.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) shall 
apply with respect to any employee removed from employment before, on, 
or after the date of the enactment of this Act.

SEC. 3. NO ADDITIONAL FUNDS AUTHORIZED.

    No additional funds are authorized to carry out the requirements of 
this Act and the amendments made by this Act. Such requirements shall 
be carried out using amounts otherwise authorized.

            Passed the House of Representatives April 21, 2016.

            Attest:

                                                 KAREN L. HAAS,

                                                                 Clerk.
```
A-AA+Skip to content

                  - Home
                  - Compendium Statistics
                  - Event
                  - Archives
                  - Glossary
                  - Help
                  - Contact
                  - Research on Disability

Annual Disability Statistics Compendium

              - Home /
              - Archives /
              - 2012 Compendium Statistics /
              - 2012 Employment /
              - 2012 2.6 Civilians with Ambulatory Disabilities 18-64 Living in the Community for the United States

## Table 2.6: Employment—Civilians with Ambulatory Disabilities Ages 18 to 64 Years Living in the Community for the United States and States: 2011

----

----

 

----

#### 2012 Disability Compendium

                        - Home
                        - Compendium Statistics                           - Population and Prevelance
                          - Employment
                          - Time Trend Population Statistics
                          - Poverty
                          - Earnings
                          - Veterans
                          - Health Insurance Coverage
                          - Health
                          - Social Security Administration Programs
                          - Medicaid and Medicare
                          - Special Education
                          - Vocational Rehabilitation
                          - Federal Government Spending and Employment
                          - International Disability Statistics
                          - Population Statistics: Disability Type
                        - Event
                        - Archives                           - 2012 Compendium Statistics
                        - Glossary
                        - Help
                        - Contact
                        - Research on Disability

#### Funding for this project is made possible by:

 The Research and Training Center on Disability Statistics and Demographics (StatsRRTC), which is funded by the U.S. Department of Education, National Institute for Disability and Rehabilitation Research, under cooperative agreements H133B080012.

#### Stay Connected

**Institute on Disability**10 West Edge Drive, Suite 101Durham, NH 03824603.862.4320 | relay: 711 | [email protected]www.iod.unh.edu

© 2013. Institute on Disability.University of New Hampshire.
I 

114TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 4016 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to extend the limitation on 

the carryover of excess corporate charitable contributions. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

NOVEMBER 16, 2015 

Mr. PAULSEN (for himself, Mr. THOMPSON of California, Mr. NUNES, and Mr. 

SMITH of Missouri) introduced the following bill; which was referred to 

the Committee on Ways and Means 

A BILL 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to extend 

the limitation on the carryover of excess corporate charitable contributions. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. EXTENSION OF LIMITATION ON CARRYOVER OF 

4 EXCESS CORPORATE CHARITABLE CON5 TRIBUTIONS. 

6 (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 170(d)(2)(A) of the Inter7 nal Revenue Code of 1986 is amended— 

8 (1) by striking ‘‘5 succeeding taxable years’’ 

9 and inserting ‘‘20 succeeding taxable years’’, and 


asabaliauskas on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 4016 IH

1 (2) by striking ‘‘the second, third, fourth, or 

2 fifth’’ and inserting ‘‘each of the second through 

3 twentieth’’. 

4 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendments made by 

5 this section shall apply to contributions made in taxable 

6 years beginning after December 31, 2009. 

Æ 


asabaliauskas on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with BILLS
NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE REHEARING 

MOTION AND, IF FILED, DETERMINED 

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL 

OF FLORIDA 

SECOND DISTRICT 

CHRISTINEANN D. SMOLINSKI, ) 

 ) 

 Appellant, ) 

 ) 

v. ) Case No. 2D14-582 

 ) 

STATE OF FLORIDA, ) 

 ) 

 Appellee. ) 

________________________________ ) 

Opinion filed December 17, 2014. 

Appeal from the Circuit Court for Polk 

County; Catherine Combee, Judge. 

Howard L. Dimmig, II, Public Defender, 

and Maureen E. Surber, Assistant 

Public Defender, Bartow, for Appellant. 

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, 

Tallahassee, and C. Suzanne Bechard, 

Assistant Attorney General, Tampa, 

for Appellee. 

KELLY, Judge. 

 Christineann D. Smolinski appeals the sentence imposed upon her 

following the revocation of her probation. We affirm her sentence but remand for entry 

of a written order of revocation of probation. 
- 2 -

 While her appeal was pending, Ms. Smolinski filed a motion to correct 

sentencing error under Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.800(b) due to the lack of a 

written order of revocation. The trial court denied the motion stating that "[a]n Order of 

Community Control was entered by this Court on January 17, 2014." Although the 

Order of Community Control reflects the conditions of probation Ms. Smolinski was 

found to have violated, this court has concluded that failure to enter a separate written 

order of revocation of probation is error. See Kiburis v. State, 18 So. 3d 1254 (Fla. 2d 

DCA 2009); Moschiano v. State, 12 So. 3d 922 (Fla. 2d DCA 2009); Dawkins v. State, 

936 So. 2d 710 (Fla. 2d DCA 2006). We therefore remand this case for entry of a 

proper written revocation order. See Kiburis, 18 So. 3d at 1254. 

 Affirmed; remanded with instructions. 

WALLACE and BLACK, JJ., Concur.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

DAY

 13,247

 12,874

 12,537

 12,644

 12,766

 12,906

 12,885

 12,779

 12,688

 12,577

 12,454

 12,314

 11,824

 11,333

 10,838

 10,366

 9,875

 9,412

 8,931

 8,452

 7,948

 7,091

 6,433

 5,953

 5,562

 4,973

 5,102

 5,248

 5,426

 5,597

 49,135

 48,663

 48,172

 47,183

 46,511

 46,272

 46,206

 46,179

 46,141

 46,152

 46,141

 46,147

 46,533

 46,910

 47,281

 47,254

 47,128

 47,210

 46,844

 46,489

 46,125

 46,136

 45,973

 45,550

 45,064

 44,789

 43,830

 42,845

 41,911

 40,947

STORAGE - A.F. 

 62,382

 61,537

 60,709

 59,827

 59,277

 59,178

 59,091

 58,958

 58,829

 58,729

 58,595

 58,461

 58,357

 58,243

 58,119

 57,620

 57,003

 56,622

 55,775

 54,941

 54,073

 53,227

 52,406

 51,503

 50,626

 49,762

 48,932

 48,093

 47,337

 46,544

715

804

649

707

672

123

361

176

133

370

394

447

408

549

252

875

996

553

1,083

1,166

912

986

886

885

982

1,142

1,186

1,018

1,287

1,080

303

378

232

262

395

73

317

109

68

320

326

379

356

492

189

623

685

361

656

746

474

559

472

430

540

706

768

595

906

680

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

NOVEMBER 2000 FULL NATURAL FLOW AT NEW MELONES DAM RUN DATE: 12/14/2000

TOTALS -16,655 13,400

* October 1, 26,579

 29.8

 30.5

 31.0

 31.5

 32.3

 32.4

 33.1

 33.3

 33.4

 34.0

 34.7

 35.4

 36.1

 37.1

 37.5

 38.7

 40.1

 40.8

 42.1

 43.6

 44.5

 45.6

 46.6

 47.4

 48.5

 49.9

 51.4

 52.6

 54.4

 55.7

DONNELLS

RES

BEARDSLEY

RES

2000 TO DATE

NEW

MELONES

INFLOW

C.F.S

NATURAL

RIVER

C.F.S

ACCUM *

FULL

NATURAL

1000 A.F.

RESERVOIR

TOTAL

-817

-845

-828

-882

-550

-99

-87

-133

-129

-100

-134

-134

-104

-114

-124

-499

-617

-381

-847

-834

-868

-846

-821

-903

-877

-864

-830

-839

-756

-793

CHANGE

A.F. C.F.S.

-412

-426

-417

-445

-277

-50

-44

-67

-65

-50

-68

-68

-52

-57

-63

-252

-311

-192

-427

-420

-438

-427

-414

-455

-442

-436

-418

-423

-381

-400
<PAGE>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.1

                CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER PURSUANT
                TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

      In connection with the Annual Report of Cardiac Science Corporation (the
Company) on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2005 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, John
R. Hinson, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that:

            (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
      or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

            (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
      material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
      Company.

                                           /s/  JOHN R. HINSON
                                        ----------------------------------------
                                        John R. Hinson
                                        Chief Executive Officer

Date: March 16, 2006
(No. 6750

#### Maryville Academy, Claimant, *vs.*State of Illinois, Department of Children and Family Services, Respondent.

*Opinion filed February*9, 1973.

Maryville Academy, Claimant, pro se.

*193William J. Scott, Attorney General; Saul R. Wexler, Assistant Attorney General, for Respondent.

Per Curiam.
§ 408.902 What is an overpayment? ( a ) As used in this subpart, the term overpayment means payment of more than the amount due for any period. For purposes of this section, payment has been made when certified by the Social Security Administration to the Department of the Treasury. Payment is not considered to have been made where payment has not been received by the designated payee, or where payment was returned.
( b ) As used in this subpart, the term *pandemic period* for the purposes of the waiver authority in § 408.910 refers exclusively to the period of time beginning on March 1, 2020, and ending on September 30, 2020.
[69 FR 25955, May 10, 2004, as amended at 85 FR 52914, Aug. 27, 2020]
§ 411.125 Who is eligible to receive a ticket under the Ticket to Work program? ( a ) You will be eligible to receive a Ticket to Work in a month in which— ( 1 ) You are age 18 or older and have not attained age 65; and
( 2 ) ( i ) ( A ) You are a title II disability beneficiary (other than a beneficiary receiving benefit payments under § 404.316(c), § 404.337(c), § 404.352(d), or § 404.1597a of this chapter); and
( B ) You are in current pay status for monthly title II cash benefits based on disability (see subpart E of part 404 of this chapter for our rules on nonpayment of title II benefits); or
( ii ) ( A ) You are a title XVI disability beneficiary (other than a beneficiary receiving disability or blindness benefit payments under § 416.996 or § 416.1338 of this chapter);
( B ) If you are an individual described in § 416.987(a)(1) of this chapter, you are eligible for benefits under title XVI based on disability under the standard for evaluating disability for adults following a redetermination of your eligibility under § 416.987 of this chapter; and
( C ) Your monthly Federal cash benefits based on disability or blindness under title XVI are not suspended (see subpart M of part 416 of this chapter for our rules on suspension of title XVI benefit payments).
( b ) You will not be eligible to receive more than one ticket during any period during which you are either— ( 1 ) Entitled to title II benefits based on disability (see §§ 404.316(b), 404.337(b) and 404.352(b) of this chapter for when entitlement to title II disability benefits ends); or
( 2 ) Eligible for title XVI benefits based on disability or blindness and your eligibility has not terminated (see subpart M of part 416 of this chapter for our rules on when eligibility for title XVI benefits terminates).
( c ) If your entitlement to title II benefits based on disability ends and/or your eligibility for title XVI benefits based on disability or blindness terminates as described in § 411.155(b)(1) or (2), you will be eligible to receive a new ticket in a month in which— ( 1 ) Your entitlement to title II benefits based on disability is reinstated under section 223(i) of the Act, or your eligibility for title XVI benefits based on disability or blindness is reinstated under section 1631(p) of the Act; and
( 2 ) You meet the requirements of paragraphs (a)(1) and (2) of this section.
[66 FR 67420, Dec. 28, 2001, as amended at 73 FR 29339, May 20, 2008]
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

DAY HIGH

 182

 181

 178

 176

 178

 175

 176

 176

 181

 175

 180

 191

 204

 200

 209

 182

 176

 175

 166

 173

 173

 171

 177

 190

 177

 186

 179

 171

 171

 151

 166

 170

 162

 164

 161

 159

 152

 155

 154

 156

 161

 160

 171

 165

 160

 154

 152

 147

 142

 142

 140

 145

 145

 148

 150

 150

 150

 148

 146

 143

 176

 175

 172

 171

 169

 168

 164

 166

 168

 168

 169

 175

 180

 177

 172

 166

 161

 155

 151

 151

 150

 150

 151

 155

 155

 157

 156

 155

 152

 147

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

JUNE 2002 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: July 8, 2002

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

RIO VISTA ON THE SACRAMENTO RIVER
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

DAY HIGH

 17,803

 18,486

 16,604

 18,298

 17,403

 18,996

 16,632

 15,037

 15,857

 17,103

 16,257

 17,305

 17,236

 19,317

 18,425

 17,611

 18,686

 17,776

 15,544

 15,619

 15,485

 14,879

 15,628

 14,035

 14,635

 15,569

 16,482

 9,570

 14,728

 18,430

 8,824

 8,371

 5,008

 8,344

 8,231

 5,425

 6,502

 7,067

 5,408

 8,044

 8,254

 8,724

 8,815

 9,503

 6,574

 8,686

 8,304

 7,107

 5,980

 7,694

 5,944

 4,281

 7,632

 4,442

 4,932

 7,071

 4,900

 2,746

 2,304

 9,518

 12,750

 12,367

 11,610

 12,657

 12,633

 12,559

 11,728

 11,062

 11,634

 11,373

 10,949

 11,524

 12,599

 13,817

 12,702

 12,788

 12,198

 12,536

 11,204

 11,701

 10,785

 8,848

 11,362

 7,930

 9,548

 11,732

 9,428

 5,100

 8,570

 13,431

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

JUNE 2015 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: July 1, 2015

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

PITTSBURG TOP ON THE SACRAMENTO RIVER
Exhibit10.15

SUMMARY OF DIRECTORCOMPENSATION

Directors who are also employees ofthe Company do not receive compensation for serving as directors.Non-employee directors receive an annual retainer in the amount of$20,000, and the Chairman of the Board receives an additional $20,000annual retainer. Retainer fees are paid quarterly in arrears.Non-employee directors also receive cash compensation for full Boardand committee meetings as follows:

|                                              |  |                |       |        |  |  |
|----------------------------------------------|--|----------------|-------|--------|--|--|
|                                         |  | PerMeeting Fee |
| Board ofDirectors                            |  | $              | 1,500 |   |
| Audit Committee                              |  |           | 1,000 |   |
| CompensationCommittee                        |  |           | 500   |   |
| InvestmentCommittee                          |  |           | 500   |   |
| Nominating and CorporateGovernance Committee |  |           | 500   |   |
| SpecialCommittees                            |  |           | 500   |   |
|                                              |

----