alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Appendix B

Conceptual Description 

Tennessee Department of Environment and Conservation 

Division of Air Pollution Control 

9th Floor L&C Annex 

401 Church Street 

Nashville, TN 37243

Pre-Hearing Draft

Regional Haze SIP for TN Class I Areas

Appendix B - 1

January 18, 2008
Introduction 

Air Resources Specialists, Inc (ARS) was contracted by Visibility Improvement - State and 

Tribal Association of the Southeast (VISTAS) 

• to describe current visibility conditions and particulate matter concentrations at the Class 

I areas in the VISTAS region, 

• to investigate the relative contributions of regional and local sources of emissions to fine 

particle concentrations and visibility in Class I areas, 

• to discuss the rate of improvement in visibility that would demonstrate a uniform rate of 

progress toward visibility improvement goals between current visibility conditions and natural 

background visibility conditions in 2064, and 

• to describe special monitoring studies undertaken by VISTAS to better understand 

temporal and spatial variability in fine particles that contribute to visibility impairment and 

source contributions to measured organic carbon. 

Appendix B.1 contains the ARS report submitted to VISTAS 

Appendix B.2 contains a white paper written by VISTAS’s contractor Ivar Tombach that 

discusses the new IMPROVE equation and why this new equation should be used to calculate 

visibility. 

Appendix B.3 contains an journal article by Pat Brewer, VISTAS technical coordinator and Joe 

Adloch, ARS, about trends in speciated PM2.5 data and visibility across monitoring networks in the 

Southeastern United States. 

Appendix B.4 contains a journal article by Pat Brewer and Ivar Tombach about natural 

background visibility and regional haze goals in the Southeastern United States. 

Appendix B.5 contains a power point presentation about VISTAS special monitoring studies on 

carbon analyses for PM2.5 and regional haze. 

Appendix B.6 contains a power point about VISTAS special monitoring studies on continuous 

measures of speciated PM2.5. 

Appendix B.7 contains the final report from the VISTAS contractor ICF International for 

characterization of meteorology and its relationships to fine particulate mass and visibility in the 

VISTAS region. 

Pre-Hearing Draft

Regional Haze SIP for TN Class I Areas

Appendix B - 2

January 18, 2008
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### National Institutes of Health

Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as amended (5 U.S.C. App.), notice is hereby given of the following meeting.

The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

*Name of Committee:*                         Center for Scientific Review Special Emphasis Panel; Brain Development and Neurodegeneration.                    

*Date:*                         April 25, 2011.                    

*Time:*                         3 p.m. to 4 p.m.                    

*Agenda:*                         To review and evaluate grant applications.                    

*Place:*                         National Institutes of Health, 6701 Rockledge Drive, Bethesda, MD 20892 (Telephone Conference Call).                    

*Contact Person:*                         Jerry L Taylor, PhD, Scientific Review Officer, Center for Scientific Review, National Institutes of Health, 6701 Rockledge Drive, Room 5202, MSC 7846, Bethesda, MD 20892. 301-435-1175.                         *taylorje@csr.nih.gov*.                    

This notice is being published less than 15 days prior to the meeting due to the timing limitations imposed by the review and funding cycle.

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.306, Comparative Medicine; 93.333, Clinical Research, 93.306, 93.333, 93.337, 93.393-93.396, 93.837-93.844, 93.846-93.878, 93.892, 93.893, National Institutes of Health, HHS)

Dated: April 8, 2011.

Jennifer S. Spaeth,

Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.

[FR Doc. 2011-9133 Filed 4-14-11; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4140-01-P
(No. 74-CC-652

#### Cities Service Oil Company, Claimant, *vs.*State of Illinois, Department of Conservation, Respondent.

*Opinion filed May 15, 1974.*

Cities Service Oil Company, Claimant, pro se.

William J. Scott, Attorney General; Howard W. Feldman, Assistant Attorney General, for Respondent.

Per Curiam.
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff — Appellee, v. Richard Scott MORK, Defendant— Appellant.

No. 04-30547.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted Feb. 13, 2006.*

Decided Feb. 16, 2006.

Before: FERNANDEZ, RYMER, and BYBEE, Circuit Judges.

*

 This panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

MEMORANDUM **

Richard Scott Mork appeals from his sentence .following his guilty plea conviction for bank fraud in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1344. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291.

Mork contends that the district court erred in enhancing his offense level under U.S.S.G. § 3B1.3 because he did not abuse a position of public or private trust vis-avis the banks, who he identifies as the only victims of his crimes. We disagree. “A position of trust under § 3B1.3 must be examined from the victim’s perspective,” but “victims of fraud are not limited to the entities that bear the ultimate financial burden, but also include those who bear emotional, financial and other burdens.” *United States v. Peyton,*353 F.3d 1080, 1091 (9th Cir.2003). Mork’s victims included not only the defrauded banks, but also vehicle purchasers who unwittingly bought cars subject to the banks’ liens.

Nevertheless, because the district court’s factfinding regarding the position of trust enhancement resulted in a sentence exceeding that which could be imposed based solely on the facts Mork admitted in his plea agreement, we remand to the sentencing court to proceed pursuant to *United States v. Ameline,*409 F.3d 1073, 1078 (9th Cir.2005) (en banc).

REMANDED.

**

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.
[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 76 (Wednesday, April 20, 2011)]
[Notices]
[Page 22146]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2011-9619]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE

Drug Enforcement Administration


Manufacturer of Controlled Substances Notice of Application

    Pursuant to Sec.  1301.33(a) of Title 21 of the Code of Federal 
Regulations (CFR), this is notice that on February 24, 2011, Stepan 
Company, Natural Products Dept., 100 W. Hunter Avenue, Maywood, New 
Jersey 07607, made application by renewal to the Drug Enforcement 
Administration (DEA) as a bulk manufacturer of the following basic 
classes of controlled substances:

------------------------------------------------------------------------
                    Drug                               Schedule
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Cocaine (9041)..............................  II
Ecgonine (9180).............................  II
------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The company plans to manufacture the listed controlled substances 
in bulk for distribution to its customers.
    Any other such applicant, and any person who is presently 
registered with DEA to manufacture such substances, may file comments 
or objections to the issuance of the proposed registration pursuant to 
21 CFR 1301.33(a).
    Any such written comments or objections should be addressed, in 
quintuplicate, to the Drug Enforcement Administration, Office of 
Diversion Control, Federal Register Representative (ODL), 8701 
Morrissette Drive, Springfield, Virginia 22152; and must be filed no 
later than June 20, 2011.

     Dated: April 13, 2011.
Joseph T. Rannazzisi,
Deputy Assistant Administrator, Office of Diversion Control, Drug 
Enforcement Administration.
[FR Doc. 2011-9619 Filed 4-19-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4410-09-P
(No. 73-CC-436

#### Associated Anesthesiologists of Decatur, Claimant, *vs.*State of Illinois, Department of Mental Health, Respondent.

*Opinion filed August 2, 1973.*

Associated Anesthesiologists of Decatur, Claimant, pro se.

William J. Scott, Attorney General; William E. Webber, Assistant Attorney General, for Respondent.

Per Curiam.
§ 411.175 What if a continuing disability review is begun before my ticket is in use? ( a ) If we begin a continuing disability review before the date on which your ticket is in use, you may still assign the ticket and receive services from an employment network or a State vocational rehabilitation agency acting as an employment network under the Ticket to Work program, or you may still receive services from a State vocational rehabilitation agency that elects the vocational rehabilitation cost reimbursement option. However, we will complete the continuing disability review. If in this review we determine that you are no longer disabled, in most cases you will no longer be eligible to receive benefit payments. However, if your ticket was in use before we determined that you are no longer disabled, in certain circumstances you may continue to receive benefit payments (see §§ 404.316(c), 404.337(c), 404.352(d), and 416.1338 of this chapter). If you appeal the decision that you are no longer disabled, you may also choose to have your benefits continued pending reconsideration or a hearing before a judge on the cessation determination (see §§ 404.1597a and 416.996 of this chapter).
( b ) The date on which we begin the continuing disability review is the date on the notice we send you that tells you that we are beginning to review your disability case.
[66 FR 67420, Dec. 28, 2001, as amended at 73 FR 29341, May 20, 2008; 85 FR 73159, Nov. 16, 2020]
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
 WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549
 FORM 8-K
 CURRENT REPORT PURSUANT
TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE
SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
 June 29, 2011
 Date of Report (Date
of earliest event reported)
 Anchor BanCorp Wisconsin Inc.
  WI
 001-34955
    
    39-1726871(Commission File Number)
    
    (IRS Employer Identification No.)
 25 West Main Street, Madison, Wisconsin 57303
 608-252-8982
  o
    
    Written communications pursuant to Rule 425 under the Securities Act (17 CFR 230.425)
 o
    
    Soliciting material pursuant to Rule 14a12 under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.14a-12)
 o
    
    Pre-commencement communications pursuant to Rule 14d-2(b) under the Exchange Act (17 CFR
240.14d-2(b))
 o
    
    Pre-commencement communications pursuant to Rule 13e-4(c) under the Exchange Act (17 CFR
240.13e-4(c))




---



##### 



Item 5.02
    
    Departure of Directors or Certain Officers; Election of
Directors; Appointment of Certain Officers; Compensatory
Arrangements of Certain Officers.
    Item 9.01. Financial Statements and Exhibits.
  Exhibit #
    
    Description10.1
    
    10.1 Employment Agreement of Chris M. Bauer




---



##### 



Anchor BanCorp Wisconsin, Inc.Date: June 30, 2011
    By:

/s/ Mark D. TimmermanExecutive Vice President, Secretary and
General Counsel
June 2021

STORAGE INFLOW- C.F.S. RELEASE - C.F.S. GAINS(+)

ACRE-FEET O'NEILL S.LUIS CALIF. O'NEILL

S.LUIS DOS AMIGOS * OR LOSS

(-)

DAY ELEV IN LAKE CHANGE PUMPING GEN. AQUEDUCT GEN. PUMPING PUMPING DELIV. C.F.S.

50,326

1 222.56 49,873 -453 0 2,360 31 1,119 0 1,315 -185

2 221.91 48,150 -1,723 0 2,950 42 1,419 0 1,951 -490

3 221.40 46,810 -1,340 0 2,952 84 1,587 0 1,711 -415

4 221.37 46,731 -79 0 3,540 55 1,464 0 1,846 -326

5 221.51 47,099 368 0 3,516 4 1,376 0 1,705 -253

6 221.65 47,467 368 0 2,933 72 1,024 0 1,415 -381

7 222.14 48,756 1,289 0 4,078 56 931 0 1,778 -776

8 221.10 46,023 -2,733 0 1,075 178 1,382 0 1,563 315

9 221.18 46,233 210 0 4,099 81 1,657 0 1,924 -494

10 222.43 49,527 3,294 0 4,715 205 1,469 0 1,665 -126

11 223.14 51,420 1,893 0 4,018 47 1,268 0 1,660 -183

12 223.23 51,661 241 0 2,881 35 1,107 0 1,467 -220

13 222.70 50,246 -1,415 0 1,725 41 991 0 1,252 -236

14 222.63 50,060 -186 0 2,869 55 1,215 0 1,425 -379

15 221.90 48,124 -1,936 0 2,867 53 1,734 0 1,739 -423

16 222.07 48,571 447 0 4,536 56 1,753 0 2,323 -291

17 222.60 49,980 1,409 0 4,656 29 1,660 0 2,313 -2

18 223.01 51,073 1,093 0 4,562 49 1,658 0 2,001 -401

19 222.18 48,863 -2,210 0 2,797 34 1,798 0 1,771 -376

20 223.33 51,928 3,065 0 3,372 341 1,397 0 1,491 720

21 222.45 49,580 -2,348 0 3,380 58 1,303 0 1,638 -1,681

22 222.20 48,916 -664 0 3,832 41 1,802 0 1,992 -414

23 222.24 49,022 106 0 4,438 59 1,917 0 2,335 -191

24 222.29 49,155 133 0 4,460 38 1,953 0 2,167 -311

25 222.54 49,820 665 0 4,427 49 1,736 0 2,123 -282

26 222.96 50,939 1,119 0 3,873 25 1,525 0 1,707 -102

27 223.31 51,875 936 0 3,288 49 1,258 0 1,430 -177

28 223.86 53,350 1,475 0 3,827 27 1,244 0 1,821 -45

29 223.27 51,768 -1,582 0 3,280 49 1,763 0 2,014 -350

30 222.12 48,703 -3,065 0 3,270 78 2,204 0 2,100 -220

TOTALS -1,623 0 104,57

6

2,021 44,714 0 53,642 -8,695

ACRE-FEET -1,623 0 207,42

6

4,014 88,690 0 106,395 731 -17,247

* DAILY DEL. FIGURES UNAVAILABLE. TOT. DEL. IS INCLUDED IN COMPUTING MONTHLY TOTALS

SUMMARY

Release (ACRE-FEET)

O'Neill Generation 88,690 Dos Amigos Pump 106,395

San Luis Pump 0 Deliveries 731

Total 195816

Historical Archive and Report Database

Consolidated State-Federal O'Neill Forebay 

Daily Operations

Run Date: 9/22/2023
#### Godfrey Passino, Appellant, v. Michael Tamer, Respondent.

Judgment affirmed, with costs. All concurred.
### §2175a. Repealed. Pub. L. 97–113, title VII, §734(a)(8), Dec. 29, 1981, 95 Stat. 1560

Section, Pub. L. 93–559, §3, Dec. 30, 1974, 88 Stat. 1795, imposed a ceiling on aid to South Vietnam for procurement of fertilizers. See section 2370(f) of this title.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 04-7835

In Re: RODNEY H. WILLIAMS,

Petitioner.

On Petition for Writ of Mandamus

(CR-01-231)

Submitted: January 13, 2005 Decided: January 21, 2005

Before WIDENER, NIEMEYER, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.

Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Rodney H. Williams, Petitioner Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
- 2 -

PER CURIAM:

Rodney H. Williams petitions for writ of mandamus

alleging the district court has unduly delayed acting on motions

filed in his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (2000) case. Williams seeks an order

from this court directing the court to act. Although we find

mandamus relief is not warranted because the district court has

recently taken significant action in the case, we deny the mandamus

petition without prejudice. We grant leave to proceed in forma

pauperis. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and

legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before

the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

PETITION DENIED
#### Thomas Smith, Respondent, v. James T. Haverty’s Stables, Appellant.

— Judgment and order affirmed, with costs. Ho opinion. Present— Ingraham, P. J., McLaughlin, Laughlin, Scott and Hotchkiss, JJ.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY HIGH

 11,394

 10,569

 9,860

 10,278

 9,742

 8,349

 8,410

 8,231

 8,554

 8,894

 10,471

 10,473

 10,365

 9,669

 10,588

 10,535

 11,400

 11,376

 11,027

 11,246

 10,544

 10,416

 10,592

 10,614

 11,240

 12,040

 12,595

 12,302

 11,535

 12,030

 11,468

 2,810

 2,728

 2,640

 2,780

 2,713

 2,362

 2,610

 2,687

 2,747

 3,474

 3,075

 2,682

 2,736

 2,702

 2,895

 2,743

 2,794

 2,889

 3,352

 3,287

 3,738

 4,032

 4,266

 3,913

 3,830

 3,868

 4,126

 3,884

 3,614

 3,530

 3,769

 6,359

 6,221

 5,816

 6,111

 5,984

 5,270

 5,097

 4,970

 4,733

 5,613

 5,961

 5,856

 5,736

 5,825

 6,099

 6,172

 6,475

 6,703

 7,047

 7,111

 7,087

 6,840

 6,757

 6,602

 6,625

 7,411

 7,341

 7,047

 7,005

 6,953

 7,304

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

AUGUST 2016 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: September 15, 2016

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

PITTSBURG TOP ON THE SACRAMENTO RIVER
#### § 404.360 When a child is dependent upon the insured person.

One of the requirements for entitlement to child's benefits is that you be dependent upon the insured. The evidence you need to prove your dependency is determined by how you are related to the insured. To prove your dependency you may be asked to show that at a specific time you lived with the insured, that you received contributions for your support from the insured, or that the insured provided at least one-half of your support. These dependency requirements, and the time at which they must be met, are explained in §§ 404.361 through 404.365. The terms *living with, contributions for support,* and *one-half support* are defined in § 404.366.
### §1043. Rules and regulations; administration and enforcement

The Secretary shall promulgate such rules and regulations as he deems necessary to carry out the purposes or provisions of this chapter, and shall be responsible for the administration and enforcement of this chapter except as otherwise provided in section 1034(d) of this title.

(Pub. L. 91–597, §14, Dec. 29, 1970, 84 Stat. 1629.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

This chapter, referred to in text, was in the original "this Act", meaning Pub. L. 91–597, Dec. 29, 1970, 84 Stat. 1620, which is classified principally to this chapter. For complete classification of this Act to the Code, see Short Title note set out under section 1031 of this title and Tables.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date

For effective date of this section, see section 29 of Pub. L. 91–597, set out as a note under section 1031 of this title.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY HIGH

 17,486

 17,400

 17,919

 18,368

 19,418

 19,325

 19,788

 19,457

 20,125

 19,871

 20,247

 20,934

 18,773

 17,131

 16,520

 16,001

 17,252

 18,260

 18,031

 19,206

 20,880

 0

 20,739

 20,537

 18,695

 19,930

 17,000

 17,045

 16,845

 17,243

 17,151

 9,873

 9,347

 9,716

 10,718

 10,540

 9,270

 9,147

 9,162

 8,428

 9,010

 9,116

 9,328

 9,054

 8,566

 9,061

 7,516

 8,529

 8,967

 8,852

 8,535

 7,372

 0

 8,992

 8,471

 7,278

 9,021

 8,932

 7,679

 8,318

 9,915

 9,816

 13,448

 12,993

 13,502

 14,235

 14,017

 14,181

 13,739

 13,800

 13,826

 14,597

 14,805

 14,899

 14,392

 13,456

 12,925

 12,090

 11,956

 12,581

 12,821

 13,703

 13,721

 0

 14,235

 14,229

 12,466

 14,561

 13,303

 12,699

 12,858

 13,106

 12,942

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

JULY 2021 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: January 27, 2022

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

PITTSBURG TOP ON THE SACRAMENTO RIVER
I 

114TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 3912 

To amend the Small Business Jobs Act of 2010 to extend and expand 

the State Trade and Export Promotion (STEP) Grant Program. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

NOVEMBER 3, 2015 

Ms. KUSTER introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Small Business 

A BILL 

To amend the Small Business Jobs Act of 2010 to extend 

and expand the State Trade and Export Promotion 

(STEP) Grant Program. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Small Business Growth 

5 Through Exports Act of 2016’’. 

6 SEC. 2. EXTENSION AND EXPANSION OF STEP GRANT PRO7 GRAM. 

8 Section 1207 of the Small Business Jobs Act of 2010 

9 (15 U.S.C. 649b note) is amended— 


SSpencer on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 3912 IH

1 (1) in subsection (i), by striking ‘‘2013’’ and in2 serting ‘‘2016, and $60,000,000 for each of fiscal 

3 years 2017, 2018, and 2019’’; and 

4 (2) in subsection (j), by striking ‘‘3’’ and insert5 ing ‘‘6’’. 

Æ 


SSpencer on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
### §1797. Repealed. Pub. L. 87–195, pt. III, §642(a)(2), Sept. 4, 1961, 75 Stat. 460

Section, act Aug. 26, 1954, ch. 937, ch. IV, §537, as added July 18, 1956, ch. 627, §10(f), 70 Stat. 561; amended Aug. 14, 1957, Pub. L. 85–141, §§6, 10(h), 71 Stat. 357, 364; June 30, 1958, Pub. L. 85–477, ch. IV, §401(f), ch. V, §501(29), 72 Stat. 270, 272; July 24, 1959, Pub. L. 86–108, ch. IV, §401(j), 73 Stat. 255; May 14, 1960, Pub. L. 86–472, ch. IV, §401(k), (l), ch. V, §501(f), 74 Stat. 140, related to uses of funds under this chapter. See section 2396 of this title.
(No. 6602

#### Xerox Corporation, Claimant, *vs.*State of Illinois, Secretary of State, Respondent.

*Opinion filed July 14, 1972.*

Xerox Corporation, Claimant, pro se.

William J. Scott, Attorney General; William E. Webber, Assistant Attorney General, for Respondent.

Perlin, C.J.
#### § 367.1 Purpose and scope.

The regulations in this part establish procedures to implement the Debt Collection Act of 1982 (Pub. L. 97-365), as amended by the Debt Collection Improvement Act of 1996 (Pub. L. 104-134), 31 U.S.C. 3716. The statute authorizes the Board to collect a claim arising under an agency program by means of administrative offset, and requires the Board to refer nontax debts over 180 days delinquent to the Department of Treasury for administrative offset (the “Treasury Offset Program”). No claim may be collected by such means if outstanding for more than 10 years after the Board's right to collection of the debt first accrued, unless facts material to the Government's right to collect the debt were not known and could not reasonably have been known by the official or officials of the government who were charged with the responsibility to discover and collect such debts. This part specifies the agency procedures that will be followed by the Board for referral and collection by administrative offset.

[62 FR 19220, Apr. 21, 1997]