25394 Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 82 / Thursday, April 28, 2016 / Notices 

Response, Compensation and Liability 

Act (CERCLA), the United States 

Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) 

has entered into a settlement with James 

R. Forshaw and Wood Protection 

Products, Inc., concerning the Forshaw 

Chemicals Superfund Site located in 

Charlotte, Mecklenburg County, North 

Carolina. The settlement addresses 

recovery of CERCLA costs for a cleanup 

action performed by the EPA at the Site. 

DATES: The Agency will consider public 

comments on the settlement until May 

31, 2016. The Agency will consider all 

comments received and may modify or 

withdraw its consent to the proposed 

settlement if comments received 

disclose facts or considerations which 

indicate that the proposed settlement is 

inappropriate, improper, or inadequate. 

ADDRESSES: Copies of the settlement are 

available from the Agency by contacting 

Ms. Paula V. Painter, Program Analyst, 

using the contact information provided 

in this notice. Comments may also be 

submitted by referencing the Site’s 

name through one of the following 

methods: 

Internet: https://www.epa.gov/nc/

public-notice-settlement-concerningforshaw-chemicals-superfund-site. 

• U.S. Mail: U.S. Environmental 

Protection Agency, Superfund Division, 

Attn: Paula V. Painter, 61 Forsyth Street 

SW., Atlanta, Georgia 30303. 

• Email: Painter.Paula@epa.gov 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Paula V. Painter at 404–562–8887. 

Dated: April 5, 2016. 

Anita L. Davis, 

Chief, Enforcement and Community 

Engagement Branch, Superfund Division. 

[FR Doc. 2016–09998 Filed 4–27–16; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 6560–50–P 

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION 

AGENCY 

[EPA–HQ–OECA–2012–0703; FRL–9945– 

61–OEI] 

Information Collection Request 

Submitted to OMB for Review and 

Approval; Comment Request; NESHAP 

for Prepared Feeds Manufacturing 

(Renewal) 

AGENCY: Environmental Protection 

Agency (EPA). 

ACTION: Notice. 

SUMMARY: The Environmental Protection 

Agency has submitted an information 

collection request (ICR), ‘‘NESHAP for 

Prepared Feeds Manufacturing (40 CFR 

part 63, subpart DDDDDDD) (Renewal)’’ 

(EPA ICR No. 2354.04, OMB Control No. 

2060–0635), to the Office of 

Management and Budget (OMB) for 

review and approval in accordance with 

the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C. 

3501 et seq.). This is a proposed 

extension of the ICR, which is currently 

approved through April 30, 2016. Public 

comments were previously requested 

via the Federal Register (80 FR 32116) 

on June 5, 2015 during a 60-day 

comment period. This notice allows for 

an additional 30 days for public 

comments. A fuller description of the 

ICR is given below, including its 

estimated burden and cost to the public. 

An Agency may neither conduct nor 

sponsor, and a person is not required to 

respond to, a collection of information 

unless it displays a currently valid OMB 

control number. 

DATES: Additional comments may be 

submitted on or before May 31, 2016. 

ADDRESSES: Submit your comments, 

referencing Docket ID Number EPA– 

HQ–OECA–2012–0703, to: (1) EPA 

online using www.regulations.gov (our 

preferred method), or by email to 

docket.oeca@epa.gov, or by mail to: EPA 

Docket Center, Environmental 

Protection Agency, Mail Code 28221T, 

1200 Pennsylvania Ave. NW., 

Washington, DC 20460; and (2) OMB via 

email to oira_submission@omb.eop.gov. 

Address comments to OMB Desk Officer 

for EPA. 

EPA’s policy is that all comments 

received will be included in the public 

docket without change including any 

personal information provided, unless 

the comment includes profanity, threats, 

information claimed to be Confidential 

Business Information (CBI), or other 

information whose disclosure is 

restricted by statute. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Patrick Yellin, Monitoring, Assistance, 

and Media Programs Division, Office of 

Compliance, Mail Code 2227A, 

Environmental Protection Agency, 1200 

Pennsylvania Ave. NW., Washington, 

DC 20460; telephone number: (202) 

564–2970; fax number: (202) 564–0050; 

email address: yellin.patrick@epa.gov. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Supporting documents which explain in 

detail the information that the EPA will 

be collecting are available in the public 

docket for this ICR. The docket can be 

viewed either online at 

www.regulations.gov or in person at the 

EPA Docket Center, EPA West, Room 

3334, 1301 Constitution Ave. NW., 

Washington, DC. The telephone number 

for the Docket Center is 202–566–1744. 

For additional information about EPA’s 

public docket, visit: http://

www.epa.gov/dockets. 

Abstract: Owners and operators of 

affected facilities are required to comply 

with reporting and record keeping 

requirements for the general provisions 

of 40 CFR part 63, subpart A, as well as 

for the specific requirements at 40 CFR 

part 63, subpart DDDDDDD. This 

includes submitting initial notification 

reports, performance tests and periodic 

reports and results, and maintaining 

records of the occurrence and duration 

of any startup, shutdown, or 

malfunction in the operation of an 

affected facility, or any period during 

which the monitoring system is 

inoperative. These reports are used by 

EPA to determine compliance with the 

standards. 

Form Numbers: None. 

Respondents/affected entities: 

Prepared feeds manufacturing facilities. 

Respondent’s obligation to respond: 

Mandatory (40 CFR part 63, subpart 

DDDDDDD). 

Estimated number of respondents: 

1,800 (total). 

Frequency of response: Initially and 

annually. 

Total estimated burden: 64,100 hours 

(per year). Burden is defined at 5 CFR 

1320.3(b). 

Total estimated cost: $6,490,000 (per 

year), which includes $37,200 in either 

annualized capital/startup or operation 

& maintenance costs. 

Changes in the Estimates: There is an 

adjustment increase in the respondent 

labor hours and cost in this ICR 

compared to the previous ICR. This is 

not due to program changes. The 

increase occurred because this ICR 

assumes all existing respondents will 

take some time each year to refamiliarize with the regulatory 

requirements. Additionally, there is a 

small decrease of $36 in the estimated 

O&M cost due to rounding. This ICR 

rounds all calculated burden and costs 

to three significant digits. There is no 

change in the methodology or 

assumption used to calculate O&M cost. 

Courtney Kerwin, 

Acting-Director, Collection Strategies 

Division. 

[FR Doc. 2016–09903 Filed 4–27–16; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 6560–50–P 

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION 

AGENCY 

[EPA–R10–OAR–2015–0854: FRL–9945–88– 

Region 10] 

Adequacy Determination for the 

Medford, Oregon Carbon Monoxide 

State Implementation Plan for 

Transportation Conformity Purposes 

AGENCY: Environmental Protection 

Agency (EPA). 

mstockstill on DSK3G9T082PROD with NOTICES

Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 82 / Thursday, April 28, 2016 / Notices 25395 

ACTION: Notice of adequacy 

determination. 

SUMMARY: The Environmental Protection 

Agency (EPA) is notifying the public of 

its finding that the Medford, Oregon 

second 10-year limited maintenance 

plan (LMP) for carbon monoxide (CO) is 

adequate for transportation conformity 

purposes. The LMP was submitted to 

the EPA by the State of Oregon 

Department of Environmental Quality 

(ODEQ or the State) on December 11, 

2015, and a supplement was submitted 

on December 30, 2015. As a result of our 

adequacy finding, regional emissions 

analyses will no longer be required as 

part of the transportation conformity 

determinations for CO for the Medford 

area. 

DATES: This finding is effective May 13, 

2016. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: The 

finding will be available at the EPA’s 

conformity Web site: http://

www.epa.gov/otaq/stateresources/

transconf/adequacy.htm. You may also 

contact Dr. Karl Pepple, U.S. EPA, 

Region 10 (OAWT–107), 1200 Sixth 

Ave., Suite 900, Seattle WA 98101; (206) 

553–1778; or by email at pepple.karl@

epa.gov. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This 

action provides notice of the EPA’s 

adequacy finding regarding the second 

10-year CO limited maintenance plan 

(LMP) for the Medford area for purposes 

of transportation conformity. The EPA’s 

finding was made pursuant to the 

adequacy review process for 

implementation plan submissions 

delineated at 40 CFR 93.118(f)(1) under 

which the EPA reviews the adequacy of 

a state implementation plan (SIP) 

submission prior to the EPA’s final 

action on the implementation plan. 

The State submitted the LMP to the 

EPA on December 11, 2015, and 

submitted a supplement to EPA on 

December 30, 2015. Pursuant to 40 CFR 

93.118(f)(1), the EPA notified the public 

of its receipt of this plan and its review 

for an adequacy determination on the 

EPA’s Web site and requested public 

comment by no later than February 22, 

2016. The EPA received no comments 

on the plan during the comment period. 

As part of our analysis, we also 

reviewed the State’s compilation of 

public comments and response to 

comments that were submitted during 

the State’s public process for the LMP. 

There were no applicable adverse 

comments directed at the on-road 

portion of the LMP. 

Based on our review, the EPA believes 

it is appropriate to find this LMP 

adequate for use in transportation 

conformity determinations prior to final 

action on the LMP. The EPA notified 

ODEQ in a letter dated March 1, 2016 

(adequacy letter), subsequent to the 

close of the EPA comment period, that 

the EPA had found the LMP to be 

adequate for use in transportation 

conformity determinations. A copy of 

the adequacy letter and its enclosure are 

available in the docket for this action 

and at the EPA’s conformity Web site: 

http://www.epa.gov/otaq/

stateresources/transconf/adequacy.htm. 

Pursuant to 40 CFR 93.109(e), limited 

maintenance plans are not required to 

contain on-road motor vehicle 

emissions budgets. Accordingly, as a 

result of this adequacy finding, regional 

emissions analyses will no longer be 

required as a part of the transportation 

conformity determinations for CO for 

the Medford area. However, other 

conformity requirements still remain 

such as consultation (40 CFR 93.112), 

transportation control measures (40 CFR 

93.113), and project level analysis (40 

CFR 93.116). 

Transportation conformity is required 

by section 176(c) of the Clean Air Act. 

Transportation conformity to a SIP 

means that on-road transportation 

activities will not produce new air 

quality violations, worsen existing 

violations, or delay timely attainment of 

the national ambient air quality 

standards. The minimum criteria by 

which we determine whether a SIP is 

adequate for conformity purposes are 

specified at 40 CFR 93.118(e)(4). The 

EPA’s analysis of how the LMP satisfies 

these criteria is found in the adequacy 

letter and its enclosure. 

Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401–767Iq. 

Dated: April 19, 2016. 

Dennis J. McLerran, 

Regional Administrator, Region 10. 

[FR Doc. 2016–09968 Filed 4–27–16; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 6560–50–P 

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION 

AGENCY 

[EPA–HQ–OECA–2012–0677; FRL–9945– 

26–OEI] 

Information Collection Request 

Submitted to OMB for Review and 

Approval; Comment Request; NSPS 

for Storage Vessels for Petroleum 

Liquids for Which Construction, 

Reconstruction or Modification 

Commenced After June 11, 1973 and 

Prior to May 19, 1978 (Renewal) 

AGENCY: Environmental Protection 

Agency (EPA). 

ACTION: Notice. 

SUMMARY: The Environmental Protection 

Agency has submitted an information 

collection request (ICR), ‘‘NSPS for 

Storage Vessels for Petroleum Liquids 

for Which Construction, Reconstruction 

or Modification Commenced After June 

11, 1973 and Prior to May 19, 1978 (40 

CFR part 60, subpart K) (Renewal)’’ 

(EPA ICR No. 1797.07, OMB Control No. 

2060–0442), to the Office of 

Management and Budget (OMB) for 

review and approval in accordance with 

the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C. 

3501 et seq.). This is a proposed 

extension of the ICR, which is currently 

approved through April 30 2016. Public 

comments were requested previously 

via the Federal Register (80 FR 32116) 

on June 5, 2015 during a 60-day 

comment period. This notice allows for 

an additional 30 days for public 

comments. A fuller description of the 

ICR is given below, including its 

estimated burden and cost to the public. 

An Agency may not conduct or sponsor, 

and a person is not required to respond 

to, a collection of information unless it 

displays a currently valid OMB control 

number. 

DATES: Additional comments may be 

submitted on or before May 31, 2016. 

ADDRESSES: Submit your comments, 

referencing Docket ID Number EPA– 

HQ–OECA–2012–0677, to: (1) EPA 

online using www.regulations.gov (our 

preferred method), or by email to 

docket.oeca@epa.gov, or by mail to: EPA 

Docket Center, Environmental 

Protection Agency, Mail Code 28221T, 

1200 Pennsylvania Ave. NW., 

Washington, DC 20460; and (2) OMB via 

email to oira_submission@omb.eop.gov. 

Address comments to OMB Desk Officer 

for EPA. 

EPA’s policy is that all comments 

received will be included in the public 

docket without change including any 

personal information provided, unless 

the comment includes profanity, threats, 

information claimed to be Confidential 

Business Information (CBI), or other 

information whose disclosure is 

restricted by statute. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Patrick Yellin, Monitoring, Assistance, 

and Media Programs Division, Office of 

Compliance, Mail Code 2227A, 

Environmental Protection Agency, 1200 

Pennsylvania Ave. NW., Washington, 

DC 20460; telephone number: (202) 

564–2970; fax number: (202) 564–0050; 

email address: yellin.patrick@epa.gov. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Supporting documents which explain in 

detail the information that the EPA will 

be collecting are available in the public 

docket for this ICR. The docket can be 

viewed online at www.regulations.gov 

mstockstill on DSK3G9T082PROD with NOTICES