alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# C_2012046EN.01001501.xml

| 17.2.2012 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 46/15 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

17.2.2012

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 46/15

---

Corrigendum to Authorisation for State aid pursuant to Articles 87 and 88 of the EC Treaty — Cases where the Commission raises no objections

(
  Official Journal of the European Union C 41 of 14 February 2012
  )

Official Journal of the European Union C 41 of 14 February 2012

2012/C 46/05

On the cover and on page 5, title:

for:

read:

---
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY HIGH

 4,593

 3,990

 2,354

 1,658

 1,713

 1,916

 2,553

 3,121

 3,522

 4,642

 4,718

 5,260

 5,752

 5,554

 7,373

 6,853

 6,101

 5,819

 4,295

 4,876

 3,958

 3,602

 2,774

 3,297

 3,541

 3,963

 4,592

 3,867

 3,779

 3,330

 3,083

 464

 492

 396

 327

 317

 393

 341

 412

 521

 502

 431

 577

 620

 645

 639

 674

 631

 777

 644

 671

 464

 435

 396

 380

 422

 453

 437

 408

 359

 363

 415

 1,656

 1,446

 1,224

 889

 878

 914

 967

 1,030

 1,271

 1,509

 1,417

 1,762

 2,024

 2,173

 2,497

 2,501

 2,416

 2,474

 2,090

 2,380

 1,692

 1,180

 997

 961

 1,124

 1,256

 1,264

 1,241

 1,076

 1,038

 1,145

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

MAY 2002 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: June 5, 2002

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

PITTSBURG BOTTOM ON THE SACRAMENTO RIVER
§ 225.3 PIA computation formulas. ( a ) *General.* PIA's are generally computed under one of two normal formulas determined by the employee's eligibility year. In addition, there is a special PIA formula, based on an employee's years of coverage, that is used when it produces a PIA that is higher than the PIA computed under the appropriate PIA formula. The two most common PIA formulas are the Average Indexed Monthly Earnings PIA formula and the Average Monthly Earnings PIA formula. The special PIA formula is called the Special Minimum PIA formula.
( b ) *Average Indexed Monthly Earnings PIA formula.* When the employee's eligibility year is after 1978, the Tier I PIA, Overall Minimum PIA, Survivor Tier I PIA, Employee's Retirement Insurance Benefit PIA and Residual Lump-Sum PIA are computed under the Average Indexed Monthly Earnings PIA formula.
( c ) *Average Monthly Earnings PIA formula.* The Average Monthly Earnings PIA formula is used to compute a PIA for one of two reasons: either the employee's eligibility year is before 1979 or the type of PIA requires that it always be computed under the Average Monthly Earnings PIA formula. ( 1 ) *Use of Average Monthly Earnings PIA formula based on the employee's eligibility year.* The Average Monthly Earnings PIA formula is used in computing the Tier I PIA, the Overall Minimum PIA, the Employee Fictional Retirement Insurance Benefit PIA and the Residual Lump-Sum PIA when the employee's eligibility year is before 1979.
( 2 ) *Types of PIA's always computed using the Average Monthly Earnings PIA formula.* The following PIA's used by the Board are determined under the Social Security Act as in effect on December 31, 1974, and are always computed using the Average Monthly Earnings PIA formula. ( i ) Combined Earnings Dual Benefit PIA described in § 225.12.
( ii ) Social Security Earnings Dual Benefit PIA described in § 225.13.
( iii ) Railroad Earnings Dual Benefit PIA described in § 225.14.
( iv ) Combined Earnings PIA described in § 225.23.
( v ) Social Security Earnings PIA described in § 225.24.
( vi ) Railroad Earnings PIA described in § 225.25.
( d ) *Special Minimum PIA formula.* The Special Minimum PIA formula is based on the employee's years of coverage. The Special Minimum PIA formula usually applies when the employee had consistently low earnings during his or her working lifetime. The Special Minimum PIA formula is used when it is higher than the PIA calculated under the applicable Average Indexed Monthly Earnings formula or the Average Monthly Earnings formula.
EXHIBIT 3.101
 Delaware
 
 The First State
       
 /s/ Harriett Smith WindsorHarriet Smith Windsor, Secretary of State 2964555 8100H
    
    AUTHENTICATION: 6211213071287012
    
    Date: 12-05-07You may verify this certificate onlineat corp.delaware.gov/authver.shtml




---



##### 



CERTIFICATE OF FORMATION
OF
PSYCHIATRIC, LLC
 Delaware Limited Liability Company Act
     By:
    
    /s/ John M. Franck IIName: John M. Franck IIAuthorized PersonState of DelawareSecretary of StateDivision of CorporationsFiled 09:00 AM 11/09/1998981430959 - 2964555




---



##### 



AMENDED AND RESTATED
CERTIFICATE OF FORMATION
OF
PSYCHIATRIC, LLC
 Delaware Limited Liability Company Act
       By:
    
    /s/ Hallie K. Ziesmer

      Name: Hallie K. ZiesmerTitle: Authorized PersonSTATE OF DELAWARESECRETARY OF STATEDIVISION OF CORPORATIONSFILED 09:00 AM 10/02/2002020612041  2964555




---



##### 



SECOND AMENDED AND RESTATED
CERTIFICATE OF FORMATION
OF
TRI-SHELL 38 LLC
 Delaware Limited Liability Company Act
        IN WITNESS WHEREOF
 By:
    
    /s/ Donald P. Fay

     Donald P. FayAuthorized PersonSTATE OF DELAWARESECRETARY OF STATEDIVISION OF CORPORATIONSDELIVERED 12:22 PM 10/17/2003FILED 12:22 PM 10/17/2003SRV 030669457  2964555 FILE
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY HIGH

 176

 174

 179

 185

 173

 188

 180

 193

 200

 198

 212

 208

 219

 207

 211

 206

 174

 175

 175

 175

 200

 169

 149

 138

 151

 167

 162

 164

 160

 212

 185

 151

 151

 162

 159

 166

 172

 171

 171

 175

 173

 174

 172

 170

 169

 169

 168

 167

 169

 171

 155

 142

 123

 126

 127

 124

 125

 132

 131

 135

 142

 138

 164

 166

 169

 170

 169

 176

 173

 177

 179

 178

 182

 180

 181

 175

 173

 172

 170

 172

 174

 170

 167

 154

 140

 132

 134

 134

 142

 147

 146

 157

 149

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

MARCH 2005 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: April 26, 2005

HIGH LOW MEAN

 58.3

 59.9

 60.0

 59.1

 59.7

 60.5

 61.5

 62.7

 64.1

 65.7

 66.4

 67.2

 64.8

 63.4

 63.1

 62.2

 60.7

 61.2

 60.8

 61.2

 61.1

 59.8

 58.1

 57.4

 59.9

 59.0

 58.1

 58.5

 57.7

 58.6

 60.5

 55.4

 57.0

 56.2

 57.6

 55.6

 56.4

 57.7

 58.2

 59.1

 61.0

 61.2

 62.2

 62.0

 58.6

 57.9

 58.1

 58.1

 58.6

 58.6

 58.0

 57.6

 57.8

 55.9

 55.0

 55.3

 56.4

 56.8

 56.6

 56.1

 54.6

 55.5

 57.0

 58.4

 58.2

 58.4

 57.6

 58.5

 59.5

 60.4

 61.7

 63.2

 63.8

 64.6

 63.4

 61.1

 60.6

 60.2

 59.6

 59.8

 59.7

 59.6

 59.4

 58.8

 57.0

 56.1

 57.5

 58.0

 57.6

 57.5

 56.8

 56.6

 58.1

HIGH LOW MEAN

 0.0

 8.9

 9.1

 9.0

 9.1

 8.5

 9.2

 9.7

 9.6

 9.5

 9.4

 9.4

 9.4

 9.7

 9.8

 9.6

 9.2

 9.6

 9.8

 9.9

 9.0

 9.4

 8.8

 8.5

 8.5

 9.5

 9.3

 9.2

 9.0

 9.2

 9.0

 0.0

 8.4

 8.4

 8.2

 8.2

 7.7

 7.8

 8.7

 8.7

 8.6

 8.4

 8.4

 8.3

 8.5

 8.7

 8.6

 8.2

 7.9

 9.0

 9.1

 8.5

 8.2

 8.0

 7.2

 8.0

 8.4

 8.9

 8.7

 8.5

 8.4

 8.1

 0.0

 8.6

 8.7

 8.6

 8.7

 8.1

 8.5

 9.1

 9.1

 8.9

 8.9

 8.8

 8.8

 9.0

 9.1

 9.0

 8.6

 8.7

 9.3

 9.3

 8.9

 8.8

 8.4

 7.8

 8.3

 9.0

 9.1

 8.9

 8.8

 8.7

 8.7

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

RIPON ON THE STANISLAUS RIVER

 ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS WATER TEMPERATURE, DEG DISSOLVED OXYZEN, PPM
Exhibit 23

[CROWE CHIZEK LOGO]

CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS

We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration Statement No. 33-63005
on Form S-3 of National Bancshares Corporation of our report dated January 26, 2001 on the
consolidated  balance sheets of National Bancshares Corporation as of December 31, 2000 and 1999,
and the related  consolidated statements of income, shareholders' equity and cash flows for each of the
three years in  the period ended December 31, 2000; which report is incorporated by reference in
this Annual Report on Form 10-K.

|                             |  |                                  
|---------------------------- |  | ---------------------------------
|                             |  | /s/ Crowe, Chizek and Company LLP
|                             |  | Crowe, Chizek and Company LLP    
|                            
|                            
|Columbus, OhioMarch 26, 2001 |
#### § 332.7 Consideration of evidence.

An employee shall be requested to furnish such information as to any mileage or work restrictions or as to lay-over or stand-by status as may be necessary for the determination of his claim. An employee's statement in connection with his claim that he was not out of service because of a lay-over or stand-by rule or because of a mileage or work restriction shall, in the absence of evidence to the contrary, be accepted as sufficient for a finding on that point. An employee's report of the number of miles or hours' credit earned in rotating extra board, pool, or chain gang service shall, in the absence of evidence to the contrary, be accepted as correct for purposes of determining whether he had the equivalent of full-time work during the period covered by his claim. When it appears clear that an employee in rotating extra board, pool, or chain gang service who fails to report the number of miles or hours' credit earned on days in the period covered by his claim form was not employed on enough days to have had the equivalent of full-time work in the period, no additional information as to mileage or work restrictions shall be deemed necessary for the determination of his claim.
§ 404.507 Fault. *Fault* as used in *without fault* (see § 404.506 and 42 CFR 405.355) applies only to the individual. Although the Administration may have been at fault in making the overpayment, that fact does not relieve the overpaid individual or any other individual from whom the Administration seeks to recover the overpayment from liability for repayment if such individual is not without fault. In determining whether an individual is at fault, the Social Security Administration will consider all pertinent circumstances, including the individual's age and intelligence, and any physical, mental, educational, or linguistic limitations (including any lack of facility with the English language) the individual has. Notwithstanding any other provision of this subpart, we will not determine any overpaid individual to be at fault in causing a qualifying overpayment (see § 404.506(b)(1)) unless we determine that the qualifying overpayment made to a beneficiary or a representative payee during the pandemic period (see § 404.501) was the result of fraud or similar fault or involved misuse of benefits by a representative payee (see § 404.2041). What constitutes fault (except for *deduction overpayments*—see § 404.510) on the part of the overpaid individual or on the part of any other individual from whom the Administration seeks to recover the overpayment depends upon whether the facts show that the incorrect payment to the individual or to a provider of services or other person, or an incorrect payment made under section 1814(e) of the Act, resulted from: ( a ) An incorrect statement made by the individual which he knew or should have known to be incorrect; or
( b ) Failure to furnish information which he knew or should have known to be material; or
( c ) With respect to the overpaid individual only, acceptance of a payment which he either knew or could have been expected to know was incorrect.
[34 FR 14888, Sept. 27, 1969; 34 FR 15646, Oct. 9, 1969, as amended at 44 FR 34942, June 18, 1979; 59 FR 1634, Jan. 12, 1994; 85 FR 52914, Aug. 27, 2020]
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                                      5
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1,000
       
<S>                                            <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                  6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              JAN-30-1999
<PERIOD-START>                                 FEB-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                                   AUG-01-1998
<CASH>                                         230
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  35,577
<ALLOWANCES>                                   1,463
<INVENTORY>                                    69,114
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               107,840
<PP&E>                                         43,598
<DEPRECIATION>                                 8,740
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 150,401
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          34,344
<BONDS>                                        0
<COMMON>                                       104
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<OTHER-SE>                                     22,232
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   150,401
<SALES>                                        127,637
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               127,637
<CGS>                                          109,082
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  109,082
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             3,886
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                165
<INCOME-TAX>                                   9
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            174
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   174
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  .02
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  .02
        

</TABLE>
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

DAY HIGH

 196

 193

 194

 193

 195

 188

 183

 180

 176

 180

 181

 185

 191

 195

 191

 190

 190

 190

 186

 182

 175

 183

 168

 162

 159

 156

 150

 152

 150

 159

 175

 177

 182

 184

 182

 171

 167

 165

 160

 161

 165

 168

 172

 178

 180

 181

 182

 176

 167

 163

 160

 154

 155

 152

 144

 141

 139

 139

 138

 136

 183

 185

 186

 186

 186

 180

 174

 169

 167

 168

 173

 176

 181

 183

 184

 184

 184

 182

 175

 170

 166

 164

 159

 155

 151

 147

 144

 143

 142

 142

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

JUNE 2000 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: July 12, 2000

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

RIO VISTA ON THE SACRAMENTO RIVER
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY HIGH

 66

 60

 70

 70

 74

 69

 67

 66

 68

 65

 62

 62

 65

 69

 70

 69

 68

 67

 66

 66

 67

 66

 67

 72

 72

 69

 68

 69

 69

 69

 70

 60

 57

 60

 61

 61

 66

 65

 65

 66

 62

 62

 61

 61

 66

 68

 67

 66

 66

 66

 66

 65

 65

 64

 69

 69

 68

 68

 67

 67

 68

 69

 63

 58

 67

 64

 69

 67

 65

 65

 67

 64

 62

 61

 62

 68

 69

 68

 67

 66

 66

 66

 65

 65

 65

 71

 70

 68

 68

 68

 68

 68

 69

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

DECEMBER 2019 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: January 7, 2020

HIGH LOW MEAN

 51.2

 53.3

 53.6

 53.7

 53.5

 53.4

 54.1

 54.0

 53.4

 53.1

 53.0

 53.5

 53.6

 53.3

 52.8

 51.3

 50.2

 51.4

 52.8

 52.1

 51.5

 51.7

 51.7

 50.9

 50.9

 51.2

 50.4

 49.3

 50.3

 51.5

 50.8

 50.0

 51.3

 53.3

 53.4

 53.0

 52.6

 53.4

 53.4

 52.9

 52.7

 52.7

 52.9

 53.4

 52.8

 51.4

 50.2

 49.6

 49.8

 51.5

 51.4

 50.9

 50.6

 50.9

 49.9

 50.2

 50.3

 49.2

 48.3

 48.8

 50.2

 49.7

 50.5

 52.7

 53.4

 53.6

 53.3

 53.0

 53.8

 53.8

 53.2

 52.9

 52.8

 53.2

 53.5

 53.1

 52.1

 50.7

 49.9

 50.5

 52.1

 51.7

 51.2

 51.2

 51.4

 50.4

 50.6

 50.7

 49.7

 48.9

 49.5

 50.8

 50.1

HIGH LOW MEAN

 10.6

 10.4

 10.1

 10.1

 10.3

 10.3

 10.0

 9.8

 9.9

 10.0

 10.0

 10.0

 10.0

 9.6

 9.8

 10.3

 10.5

 10.5

 10.4

 10.5

 10.6

 10.5

 10.4

 10.6

 10.7

 10.7

 10.9

 11.1

 11.1

 11.0

 11.1

 10.4

 10.1

 10.0

 10.0

 10.1

 10.0

 9.8

 9.7

 9.8

 9.9

 10.0

 9.9

 9.6

 9.3

 9.3

 9.9

 10.3

 10.3

 10.2

 10.3

 10.4

 10.4

 10.3

 10.5

 10.6

 10.6

 10.7

 10.9

 10.9

 10.7

 10.8

 10.5

 10.2

 10.0

 10.1

 10.1

 10.1

 9.9

 9.7

 9.8

 9.9

 10.0

 10.0

 9.9

 9.5

 9.6

 10.1

 10.4

 10.4

 10.3

 10.4

 10.5

 10.5

 10.4

 10.6

 10.6

 10.6

 10.8

 11.0

 11.0

 10.8

 10.9

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

RIPON ON THE STANISLAUS RIVER

 ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS WATER TEMPERATURE, DEG DISSOLVED OXYZEN, PPM
# C_2012280EN.01001202.xml

| 15.9.2012 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 280/12 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

15.9.2012

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 280/12

---

Information communicated by Member States regarding closure of fisheries

2012/C 280/09

In accordance with Article 35(3) of Council Regulation (EC) No 1224/2009 of 20 November 2009 establishing a Community control system for ensuring compliance with the rules of the common fisheries policy (1), a decision has been taken to close the fishery as set down in the following table:

1

| Date and time of closure | 13.8.2012 |
| --- | --- |
| Duration | 13.8.2012-31.12.2012 |
| Member State | Spain |
| Stock or Group of stocks | USK/567EI. |
| Species | Tusk (Brosme brosme) |
| Zone | EU and international waters of V, VI and VII |
| Type(s) of fishing vessels | — |
| Reference number | FS25TQ44 |

Date and time of closure

13.8.2012

Duration

13.8.2012-31.12.2012

Member State

Spain

Stock or Group of stocks

USK/567EI.

Species

Tusk (Brosme brosme)

Brosme brosme

Zone

EU and international waters of V, VI and VII

Type(s) of fishing vessels

—

Reference number

FS25TQ44

---

(1)  OJ L 343, 22.12.2009, p. 1.

1

---
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY ELEVATION

 252.56

 252.50

 252.55

 252.53

 252.50

 252.59

 252.53

 252.56

 252.56

 252.50

 252.51

 252.53

 252.56

 252.55

 252.56

 252.54

 252.51

 252.56

 252.51

 252.51

 252.52

 252.55

 252.55

 252.54

 252.49

 252.55

 252.55

 252.52

 252.54

 252.46

 252.44

 3,953

 3,924

 3,948

 3,938

 3,924

 3,968

 3,938

 3,953

 3,953

 3,924

 3,928

 3,938

 3,953

 3,948

 3,953

 3,943

 3,928

 3,953

 3,928

 3,928

 3,933

 3,948

 3,948

 3,943

 3,919

 3,948

 3,948

 3,933

 3,943

 3,904

 3,894

STORAGE

-5

-29

+24

-10

-14

+44

-30

+15

+0

-29

+4

+10

+15

-5

+5

-10

-15

+25

-25

+0

+5

+15

+0

-5

-24

+29

+0

-15

+10

-39

-10

CHANGE

 1,345

 1,262

 1,207

 1,222

 1,247

 1,095

 940

 863

 717

 724

 1,000

 1,031

 1,112

 1,141

 989

 850

 706

 767

 873

 841

 939

 983

 965

 951

 1,123

 1,148

 1,009

 1,226

 1,300

 1,354

 1,419

 14,310

 14,070

 14,430

 14,190

 15,870

 15,310

 15,510

 15,270

 15,303

 15,270

 14,910

 14,670

 14,670

 15,030

 15,270

 15,510

 15,870

 15,270

 15,390

 15,390

 15,270

 15,510

 15,510

 15,510

 15,750

 14,670

 15,270

 15,630

 15,270

 14,910

 14,670

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

JULY 2000 RED BLUFF DIVERSION RESERVOIR DAILY OPERATIONS RUN DATE: August 21, 2000

IN LAKE

CANAL

 ACRE-FEET

TOTALS -64 32,349 469,483

ACRE-FEET -64 64,164 931,220

SUMMARY

RELEASE (ACRE-FEET)

TOTAL 999,323

 3,958

RELEASE

RIVER

CORNING TO SACTO

CANAL

RELEASE C.F.S

TEHAMA

COLUSA

 82

 72

 43

 52

 33

 45

 57

 55

 55

 45

 85

 107

 63

 53

 45

 59

 63

 56

 82

 81

 51

 54

 69

 62

 41

 94

 77

 102

 89

 58

 56

 1,986

 3,939

CORNING CANAL 3,939

TEHAMA-COLUSA CANAL 64,164

TO SACTO RIVER 931,220

Table 9
# C_2012394EN.01002601.xml

| 20.12.2012 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 394/26 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

20.12.2012

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 394/26

---

Information communicated by Member States regarding closure of fisheries

2012/C 394/10

In accordance with Article 35(3) of Council Regulation (EC) No 1224/2009 of 20 November 2009 establishing a Community control system for ensuring compliance with the rules of the common fisheries policy (1), a decision has been taken to close the fishery as set down in the following table:

1

| Date and time of closure | 26.11.2012 |
| --- | --- |
| Duration | 26.11.2012-31.12.2012 |
| Member State | Spain |
| Stock or group of stocks | BUM/ATLANT |
| Species | Blue marlin (Makaira nigricans) |
| Zone | Atlantic Ocean |
| Type(s) of fishing vessels | — |
| Reference number | FS77TQ44 |

Date and time of closure

26.11.2012

Duration

26.11.2012-31.12.2012

Member State

Spain

Stock or group of stocks

BUM/ATLANT

Species

Blue marlin (Makaira nigricans)

Makaira nigricans

Zone

Atlantic Ocean

Type(s) of fishing vessels

—

Reference number

FS77TQ44

---

(1)  OJ L 343, 22.12.2009, p. 1.

1

---
EXHIBIT
32





CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C.
Section 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002








In
connection with the Annual Report of Cascade Technologies, Corp. (the “Company”)
on Form 10-K for the period ended August 31, 2008, as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Rick Walchuk,
President and Principal Executive Officer, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:





(1)           The
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)           The
information contained in this Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





Date:
      December 1, 2008
              By:
              /s/ Rick
      WalchukName:
      Rick WalchukTitle:
      President (Principal Executive Officer)
(No. 6610

#### Jefferson Stationers, Inc., Claimant, *vs.*State of Illinois, Superintendent of Public Instruction, Respondent.

*Opinion filed July 14, 1972.*

Jefferson Stationers, Inc., Claimant, pro se.

William J. Scott, Attorney General; William E. Webber, Assistant Attorney General, for Respondent.

Perlin, C.J.