alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
### §§1761 to 1765. Repealed. Pub. L. 87–195, pt. III, §642(a)(2), Sept. 4, 1961, 75 Stat. 460

Section 1761, acts Aug. 26, 1954, ch. 937, ch. IV, §509, 68 Stat. 853; July 8, 1955, ch. 301, §9(d), 69 Stat. 288; July 18, 1956, ch. 627, §9(d), 70 Stat. 560; Aug. 14, 1957, Pub. L. 85–141, §9(d), 71 Stat. 363; June 30, 1958, Pub. L. 85–477, ch. IV, §401(b), 72 Stat. 269, related to shipping on United States vessels. See section 2353 of this title.

Section 1762, acts Aug. 26, 1954, ch. 937, ch. IV, §510, 68 Stat. 853; June 30, 1958, Pub. L. 85–477, ch. IV, §401(c), ch. V, §501(19), 72 Stat. 269, 271; July 24, 1959, Pub. L. 86–108, ch. IV, §401(d), 73 Stat. 253, related to purchase of commodities in bulk and to surplus agricultural commodities. See section 2354 of this title.

Section 1763, acts Aug. 26, 1954, ch. 937, ch. IV, §511, 68 Stat. 853; Aug. 14, 1957, Pub. L. 85–141, §9(e), 71 Stat. 363; June 30, 1958, Pub. L. 85–477, ch. V, §501(20), (21), 72 Stat. 271, provided for preservation of military stock and retention and return of equipment. See section 2355 of this title.

Section 1764, act Aug. 26, 1954, ch. 937, ch. IV, §512, 68 Stat. 854, prescribed penalties for accepting commissions, etc., for procurement services by United States officers and employees.

Section 1765, act Aug. 26, 1954, ch. 937, ch. IV, §513, as added Aug. 14, 1957, Pub. L. 85–141, §9(f), 71 Stat. 363; amended June 30, 1958, Pub. L. 85–477, ch. V, §501(22), 72 Stat. 271; May 14, 1960, Pub. L. 86–472, ch. IV, §401(d), 74 Stat. 139, provided for notice to legislative committees. See section 2394(d) of this title.
**EXHIBIT 12(a)**

 

### **COMPUTATION OF RATIO OF EARNINGS TO FIXED CHARGES**

 

### **PURSUANT TO SEC REPORTING REQUIREMENTS******(1)

### (Millions of Dollars)

 
| ** **                          | ** ** | Three Months Ended | ** ** |
|-------------------------------------|------------|------------------------------|------------|
| ** **                          | ** ** | March 31                | ** ** |
| ** **                          | ** ** | **2008**                     | ** ** | 2007 | ** ** |
|                                |       |                         |       |   |   |
| FIXED CHARGES                       |       |                         |       |   |   |
| Interest expense                    | ** ** | **$**                        | **44.8**   |   | $ | 49.1 |   |
| Portion of  rentals deemed interest | ** ** | **.4**                       |       | .4 |   |
|                                |       |                         |       |   |   |
| TOTAL FIXED  CHARGES                | ** ** | **$**                        | **45.2**   |   | $ | 49.5 |   |
|                                |       |                         |       |   |   |
| EARNINGS                            |       |                         |       |   |   |
| Income before  taxes                | ** ** | **$**                        | **24.9**   |   | $ | 33.1 |   |
| Fixed charges                       | ** ** | **45.2**                     |       | 49.5 |   |
|                                |       |                         |       |   |   |
| EARNINGS AS  DEFINED                | ** ** | **$**                        | **70.1**   |   | $ | 82.6 |   |
|                                |       |                         |       |   |   |
| RATIO OF EARNINGS  TO FIXED CHARGES | ** ** | **1.55X**                    |       | 1.67X |   |

 

(1) The method of computing the ratio of earnings to fixed chargesshown above complies with SEC reporting requirements but differs from themethod called for in the Support Agreement between the Company and PACCAR asshown in Exhibit 12(b).

 

----
### SUBCHAPTER XXIX—UNITED STATES-MEXICO BORDER HEALTH COMMISSION
Order entered November 10, 2015

In The 

## Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

No. 05
- 15
- 00184
- CR VICTOR RENARD BROWN, Appellant

V. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee On Appeal from the 194th Judicial District Court

Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. F14
- 76504
- M



### O RDER
T h e Court DENIES appellant’s pro se motion for extension of time to file brief. The
Court notified appellant by letter dated Augu st 10, 2015 that the deadline for filing a pro se response to the Anders brief filed in t his case was October 8, 2015. This case is set for submission on November 24, 2015.
We ORDER the Clerk of the Court to send a copy of this order to Victor Renard Brown, TDCJ No. 01977507, Bradshaw Unit, P.O. Box 9000, Henderson, Texas, 75653.

/s/ ROBERT M. FILLMORE PRESIDING JUSTICE
### §16. Introduction into, or sale in, State or Territory or District of Columbia of dairy or food products falsely labeled or branded

No person or persons, company or corporation, shall introduce into any State or Territory of the United States or the District of Columbia from any other State or Territory of the United States or the District of Columbia, or sell in the District of Columbia or in any Territory any dairy or food products which shall be falsely labeled or branded as to the State or Territory in which they are made, produced, or grown, or cause or procure the same to be done by others.

(July 1, 1902, ch. 1357, §1, 32 Stat. 632.)
Exhibit 31.1

TENNESSEE COMMERCE BANCORP, INC.
CERTIFICATIONCHAIRMAN AND CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

I,
Michael R. Sapp, certify that:

1.     I
have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of Tennessee Commerce Bancorp, Inc.

2.     Based
on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in
light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3.     Based
on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition,
results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4.     The
registrant's other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act
Rules 13a-15e and 15d-15e) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for
the registrant and we have:



5.     The
registrant's other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant's
auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):



Date: March 31, 2011

Signature:

/s/ MICHAEL R. SAPP Michael R. Sapp
Chairman and Chief Executive Officer


---



QuickLinks
Exhibit 3.18
 
 AMENDED AND RESTATED BYLAWS
 of
 THE BASKETBALL MARKETING COMPANY, INC.




---



##### 



AMENDED AND RESTATED BYLAWS
OF  THE BASKETBALL MARKETING COMPANY, INC.
  Stockholders
 Annual Meetings .
 Special Meetings
 Notice of Meetings
 Adjournments
 Quorum




---



##### 



Organization
 Voting; Proxies
 Fixing Date for Determination of Stockholders of Record
 2




---



##### 



List of Stockholders Entitled to Vote
 Consent of Stockholders in Lieu of Meeting
  Board of Directors
 Powers; Number; Qualifications
 Election; Term of Office; Resignation; Removal; Vacancies
 3




---



##### 



Regular Meetings
 Special Meetings
 Telephonic Meetings Permitted
 Quorum; Vote Required for Action
 Organization
 Informal Action by Directors
  Committees
 Committees
 4




---



##### 



Committee Rules
  Officers
 Officers; Election; Qualification; Term of Office; Resignation; Removal;
Vacancies
 Powers and Duties of Executive Officers
 5




---



##### 



Stock
 Certificates and Uncertificated Shares
 Transfers; Lost, Stolen or Destroyed Stock Certificates; Issuance of New
Certificates
  Miscellaneous
 Fiscal Year
 Seal
 Waiver of Notice of Meetings of Stockholders, Directors and Committees
 6




---



##### 



Indemnification of Directors, Officers and Employees and Agents
 Interested Directors; Quorum
 Form of Records
 Amendment of Bylaws
 7
#### § 361.7 Written decision following a hearing.

Within thirty days after the hearing, the administrative law judge or hearing official shall issue a written decision stating the facts evidencing the nature and origin of the alleged debt; the amount and validity of the alleged debt; and the judge or hearing official's analysis, findings and conclusions with respect to the employee's position on liability for the debt and with respect to his or her eligibility for waiver. The decision of the administrative law judge or hearing official shall be the final agency decision.
#### § 220.50 Consultative examinations at the Board's expense.

A consultative examination is a physical or mental examination or test purchased for a claimant at the Board's request and expense. If the claimant's medical sources cannot provide sufficient medical evidence about the claimant's impairment(s) in order to enable the Board to determine whether the claimant is disabled, the Board may ask the claimant to have one or more consultative examinations or tests. The decision to purchase a consultative examination will be made on an individual case basis in accordance with the provisions of §§ 220.53 through 220.56. Selection of the source for the examination will be consistent with the provisions of § 220.64 (Program Integrity).

(Approved by the Office of Management and Budget under control number 3220-0124)
### §10242. Limitations

Except as provided for by this subchapter, none of the funds authorized to be appropriated for assistance for Burma by this subchapter may be made available to—

(1) the State Administrative Council or any organization or entity controlled by, or an affiliate of, the Burmese military, or to any individual or organization that has committed a gross violation of human rights or advocates violence against ethnic or religious groups or individuals in Burma, as determined by the Secretary of State for programs administered by the Department of State and the United States Agency for International Development, or President of the National Endowment for Democracy (NED) for programs administered by NED; and

(2) the Burmese military.

(Pub. L. 117–263, div. E, title LV, §5576, Dec. 23, 2022, 136 Stat. 3369.)
### SUBCHAPTER II—OBLIGATIONS OF PHILIPPINES
### §175. Omitted

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section, act Mar. 2, 1901, ch. 802, 31 Stat. 893, which appropriated funds for feeding and keeping of prisoners, was repeated in subsequent appropriation acts down to and including act Mar. 3, 1917, ch. 161, 39 Stat. 1058, but was not repeated thereafter.
Exhibit 31.1—Section 302 CertificationI, Ellen Z. Lamale, certify that: I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K, and all reports on Form 8-K containingdistribution or servicing reports filed in respect of period included in the year covered by thisannual report, of Principal Life Income Fundings Trust 2005-39;1. Based on my knowledge, the information in these reports, taken as a whole, does not containany untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make thestatements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, notmisleading as of the last day of the period covered by this annual report; 2. Based on my knowledge, the distribution or servicing information required to be provided tothe depositor by the trustee under the pooling and servicing, or similar agreement, forinclusion in these reports is included in these reports; 3. I am responsible for reviewing the activities performed by the depositor and the trusteeunder the pooling and servicing, or similar agreement, and based upon my knowledge and theannual compliance review required under that agreement, and except as disclosed in thereports, the depositor and trustee have each fulfilled its obligations under that agreement;and 4. The reports disclose all significant deficiencies relating to the compliance by the trusteeand the depositor with the minimum servicing or similar standards based upon the reportprovided by an independent public accountant, after conducting a review in compliance with theUniform Single Attestation Program for Mortgage Bankers or similar procedures, as set forth inthe pooling and servicing, or similar agreements, that is included in these reports.In giving the certifications above, I have reasonably relied on information provided to me by thefollowing unaffiliated parties: Ernst and Young and Citibank, N.A.Date: March 24, 2006     By: /s/ Ellen Z. Lamale       Name: Ellen Z. Lamale
<TABLE> <S> <C>


        

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS  SCHEDULE  CONTAINS  SUMMARY  FINANCIAL   INFORMATION  EXTRACTED  FROM  THE
FINANCIAL  STATEMENTS OF THE VILLAGE GREEN  BOOKSTORE,  INC. FOR THE FISCAL YEAR
ENDED  FEBRUARY 2, 1997,  AND IS  QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>

<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          FEB-02-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-29-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               FEB-02-1997
<CASH>                                         140,417                               
<SECURITIES>                                         0  
<RECEIVABLES>                                   80,725  
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0  
<INVENTORY>                                  2,784,531  
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             3,101,267  
<PP&E>                                       2,489,792  
<DEPRECIATION>                               1,158,479  
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               4,490,382  
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        3,042,024 
<BONDS>                                        277,090  
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0  
<PREFERRED>                                          0  
<COMMON>                                         3,741  
<OTHER-SE>                                   1,167,527  
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 4,490,382  
<SALES>                                      8,069,316  
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             8,069,316  
<CGS>                                        5,621,528  
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                9,722,421  
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             1,025,818  
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0  
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             146,497  
<INCOME-PRETAX>                             (2,824,540) 
<INCOME-TAX>                                     6,500  
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                         (2,831,040) 
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0  
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0  
<CHANGES>                                            0  
<NET-INCOME>                                (2,831,040) 
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     (.76) 
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     (.76) 
                                                        
                                            

</TABLE>
492 P.2d 1010

#### Luis P. ANDRADA, Petitioner-Appellant, v. STATE of New Mexico, Respondent-Appellee.

No. 768.

Court of Appeals of New Mexico.

Dec. 22, 1971.

Oliver H. Miles, Las Cruces, for petitioner-appellant.

*394David L. Norvell, A tty. Gen., James B. Mulcoclc, Asst. Atty. Gen., Santa Fe, for respondent-appellee.

OPINION

HENDLEY, Judge.

Petitioner’s conviction of aggravated burglary was affirmed in State v. Andrada, 82 N.M. 543, 484 P.2d 763 (Ct.App.1971). He now appeals from a denial of post-conviction relief, without hearing, pursuant to § 21-1-1 (93), N.M.S.A. 1953 (Supp.1971).

We affirm.

**Petitioner contends that he should not have been charged with and convicted of aggravated burglary; that the state failed to prove criminal intent; and, that he was intoxicated at the time the offense was committed and could not have had the requisite specific intent to commit aggravated burglary. None of these claims were raised by petitioner in his direct appeal. Post-conviction relief is not a method of obtaining consideration of those questions which should have been raised on appeal. Miller v. State, 82 N.M. 68, 475 P.2d 462 (Ct.App. 1970). These contentions at'tack the sufficiency of the evidence to support the conviction. Sufficiency of the evidence does not provide a basis for post-conviction relief. State v. Hibbs, 82 N.M. 722, 487 P.2d 150 (Ct.App.1971); Herring v. State, 81 N.M. 21, 462 P.2d 468 (Ct.App.1969).

Petitioner’s assertion that the aggravation of the offense was prompted by discrimination against him because of his Mexican heritage does not present a claim since it is not set forth with adequate specificity or factual basis to afford relief. State v. Clark, Ct.App., 493 P.2d 969, 1971.

 Petitioner contends that the facts presented to establish aggravation of the offense were false. Petitioner has done no more than state a vague conclusion. Petitioner must allege a specific factual basis for the relief sought. State v. Guy, 79 N. M. 128, 440 P.2d 803 (Ct.App. 1968). To the extent this is a claim that defendant was convicted on prejudiced testimony, it states no basis for relief. State v. Hibbs, supra, and cases therein cited.

Since the record conclusively shows that petitioner was not entitled to an evidentiary hearing on his Rule 93 motion, the order denying post-conviction relief without hearing is affirmed. State v. Sanders, 82 N.M. 61, 475 P.2d 327 (1970).

Affirmed.

It is so ordered.

WOOD, C. J., and COWAN, J., concur.
EXHIBIT 32.1
                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                                 18 U.S.C. 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In  connection  with the  annual  Report  of  Morgan  Creek  Energy  Corp.  (the
"Company") on Form 10-KSB for the period ended  December 31, 2005, as filed with
the  Securities  and  Exchange  Commission  on the date hereof  (the  "Report"),
Douglas Humphreys  President/Chief  Executive Officer of the Company,  and Grant
Atkins,  Treasurer/Chief  Financial  Officer/Secretary of the Company,  certify,
pursuant  to 18  U.S.C.  1350,  as  adopted  pursuant  to  Section  906  of  the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

The  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all  material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.


Date: March 29, 2006

/s/ Douglas Humphreys                         /s/ Grant Atkins
-------------------------                     --------------------------------
By: Douglas Humphreys                         By: Grant Atkins, Treasurer/Chief
President/Chief Executive Officer             Chief Financial Officer
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY ELEVATION

 249.12

 249.00

 249.17

 248.63

 249.41

 250.70

 247.38

 246.98

 247.50

 248.51

 247.15

 246.16

 245.07

 244.15

 243.40

 242.65

 241.10

 241.47

 240.95

 240.87

 240.67

 240.74

 240.34

 240.00

 239.64

 239.62

 239.45

 239.42

 239.33

 239.28

 239.15

 2,502

 2,459

 2,520

 2,339

 2,607

 3,103

 1,956

 1,840

 1,991

 2,301

 1,889

 1,624

 1,362

 1,162

 1,014

 875

 624

 681

 601

 590

 562

 572

 517

 470

 427

 424

 404

 400

 390

 384

 368

STORAGE

+318

-43

+61

-181

+268

+496

-1,147

-116

+151

+310

-412

-265

-262

-200

-148

-139

-251

+57

-80

-11

-28

+10

-55

-47

-43

-3

-20

-4

-10

-6

-16

CHANGE

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 53

 178

 230

 226

 220

 46

 50

 61

 96

 80

 152

 66

 75

 33

 75

 100

 29

 63,746

 57,984

 56,996

 56,115

 70,842

 62,879

 50,432

 49,896

 54,871

 55,642

 52,981

 48,364

 48,109

 25,382

 23,674

 22,095

 14,864

 15,382

 13,982

 14,284

 14,101

 13,796

 11,664

 10,986

 10,462

 10,296

 10,184

 10,211

 10,009

 9,942

 9,813

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

MARCH 2000 RED BLUFF DIVERSION RESERVOIR DAILY OPERATIONS RUN DATE: April 24, 2000

IN LAKE

CANAL

 ACRE-FEET

TOTALS -1,816 1,770 979,984

ACRE-FEET -1,816 3,511 1,943,798

SUMMARY

RELEASE (ACRE-FEET)

TOTAL 1,947,759

 2,184

RELEASE

RIVER

CORNING TO SACTO

CANAL

RELEASE C.F.S

TEHAMA

COLUSA

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 59

 80

 26

 0

 0

 0

 4

 29

 14

 15

 227

 450

CORNING CANAL 450

TEHAMA-COLUSA CANAL 3,511

TO SACTO RIVER 1,943,798

Table 9
#### § 10.708 Can a FECA beneficiary who refuses to comply with a request to assign a claim to the United States or to prosecute the claim in his or her own name be penalized?

When a FECA beneficiary refuses a request to either assign a claim or prosecute a claim in his or her own name, OWCP may determine that he or she has forfeited his or her right to all past or future compensation for the injury with respect to which the request is made. Alternatively, OWCP may also suspend the FECA beneficiary's compensation payments until he or she complies with the request.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

DAY HIGH

 3,274

 2,867

 3,159

 2,970

 2,760

 2,711

 3,332

 3,758

 3,987

 3,772

 3,936

 3,786

 3,811

 4,171

 3,815

 3,632

 3,690

 4,048

 4,630

 5,104

 5,254

 5,325

 4,834

 4,392

 4,238

 4,260

 4,121

 3,920

 0

 0

 946

 771

 827

 762

 620

 508

 491

 592

 820

 822

 943

 1,085

 1,115

 1,253

 1,276

 1,356

 1,199

 1,185

 1,232

 1,613

 2,096

 1,922

 1,474

 1,389

 1,455

 1,442

 1,661

 1,557

 0

 0

 1,869

 1,567

 1,580

 1,503

 1,245

 1,284

 1,655

 2,055

 2,137

 2,042

 2,077

 2,180

 2,300

 2,458

 2,357

 2,252

 2,170

 2,322

 2,627

 3,050

 3,595

 3,169

 2,742

 2,594

 2,565

 2,782

 2,821

 2,557

 0

 0

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

SEPTEMBER 2000 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: October 5, 2000

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

PITTSBURG BOTTOM ON THE SACRAMENTO RIVER