alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 99.1
 EQUITY RESIDENTIAL
2011 SHARE INCENTIVE PLAN
 Purpose of the Plan
    Administration




---



##### 



Participation
 Shares Subject to the Plan .
     Share Awards .
   2




---



##### 



3




---



##### 



Rights of Grantee
 Change in Control
         4




---



##### 



Share Options
 ISO/NQSO
 Exercise Price; Repricing Prohibited
 General Exercisability
 5




---



##### 



ISO Exercisability
 Immediate Vesting
      6




---



##### 



Good Cause
 Exercise Procedure
 Suspension of Right
 Share Appreciation Rights
 Grant/Repricing Prohibited
 Value
  7




---



##### 



Exercise of Tandem SARs
 Non-Tandem SAR Exercisabilty
 Acceleration.
 8




---



##### 



Other Termination
 Good Cause
 Exercise Procedure
 Settlement of SARs
 Suspension of Right
 Dividend Equivalents
 Withholding
 9




---



##### 



Compliance with Applicable Laws; Governing Law
   Transferability
 Share Awards
 Options, SARs and Dividend Equivalents
 Employment and Shareholder Status; Award Agreements
 Adjustments
 10




---



##### 



Section 162(m)
     Section 409A
 Repurchase of Share Awards, SARS and Options
 11




---



##### 



Indemnification .
 Amendments to Plan; Suspension or Termination of Plan
 General Provisions .
        12




---



##### 



Effective Date of Plan
   13
**Exhibit10.1**

AMENDMENT No. 2 TOSUPPLY AGREEMENT No. SPM 254

This Amendment (“Amendment”),effective as of January 1, 2007 is made by and between Genzyme Corporation(including certain of its Subsidiaries and Affiliates as listed on Attachment Aof the Agreement) with a principal place of business at Genzyme Center, 500Kendall Street, Cambridge, Massachusetts 02142 (“GENZYME”), and InvitrogenCorporation with a principal place of business at 1600 Faraday Avenue,Carlsbad, California 92008 (“SUPPLIER”).

**WHEREAS,** theparties entered into an Supply Agreement dated  January 1, 2005 and attachedhereto as Exhibit A (the “Purchase and Supply Agreement”), and

**WHEREAS,** theparties now wish to amend the Agreement in order to modify certain provisionsthereof;

**NOW, THEREFORE,**the parties agree as follows:

Section 1 shall beamended to add the following definition:

1.9 “Hot List” means a listof up to 50 high usage Research Products to be mutually determined by theParties.

Section 5.7 will be deletedin its entirety and replaced by the following;

5.7 Pricing forResearch Products.

5.7.1 Current US pricesfor SUPPLIER Research Products are set forth in SUPPLIER’s current catalog (“ListPrice”). Each Selling Entity has a different catalog and the List Prices mayvary by country.  [**]

5.7.2 Effective January1, 2007, price increases for all Research Products other than Research Productson the Hot List shall be determined as follows: [**]

5.7.3 [**]

5.7.4  [**]

5.7.5 [**]

Except as stated above,the existing terms of the Supply Agreement shall not be affected by thisAmendment and shall remain in full force and effect between the parties.  In the event that this Amendment is deemedunenforceable by a court of law, the Supply Agreement shall remain valid andenforceable as an agreement between the parties.
| Invitrogen Corporation          |   | Genzyme Corporation                    |
|---------------------------------|--------|----------------------------------------|
|                            |   |                                   |
|                            |   |                                   |
| /s/ Bernd Brust                 |   |                                   | /s/ Mark Bamforth |   |
| By: Bernd Brust                 |   | Mark Bamforth                          |
| Title: Senior  VP, Global Sales |   | Sr. Vice-Operation and Pharmaceuticals |
| Date: June 25,  2007            |   | Genzyme Corporate                      |
|                            |   | Date: June 14,  2007                   |
|                                 |        |                                        |  |  |

 

----

[**] = Portions of this exhibit have been omitted pursuant to a confidential treatment request. An unredacted version of this exhibit has been filed separately with the Commission

----
#### Nettie Goldstein et al., Respondents, v. Louis Levy et al., Appellants.

No opinion. Present—Close, P. J., Hagarty, Johnston, Adel and Lewis, JJ.
Rupprecht Law P. A. 

324 Datura Street, Suite 200 | West Palm Beach, FL 33401 

P: (561) 222-6979 | E: jon@jrupprechtlaw.com | W: www.jrupprechtlaw.com 

May 21, 2015

U. S. Department of Transportation

Docket Management System

1200 New Jersey Ave., SE, 

West Building Ground Floor, Room W12-140,

Washington, DC 20590

Re: Petition for Amendment to Add Aircraft to Exemption # 11440 Issued to Wild Rabbit 

Productions, LLC. (Regulatory Docket No. FAA-2015-0168)

Dear Sir or Madam:

Wild Rabbit Productions, LLC was granted an exemption to conduct aerial data collection and 

closed set TV/movie filming using an Allied Drones Chaos X-8. Wild Rabbit Productions, LLC 

(Regulatory Docket No. FAA-2015-0168) requests for an amendment to that exemption to add onto its 

fleet the DJI S1000+ and the DJI S1000 Premium. Wild Rabbit Productions, LLC agrees to operate 

under the same restrictions in the exemption. We will submit the manuals confidentially via email.

Granting the additional aircraft will benefit the public because instead of dangerous helicopters 

being used, safer and quieter unmanned aircraft can be used under the restrictions outlined in the 

exemption.

Since the S1000 platform has been previously granted in other exemptions and would not set any 

precedent, there is good cause to waive the publishing of this petition in the Federal Register.

Sincerely,

__________________________________________________

Jonathan B. Rupprecht, Esq.
()RE:Fw:ProposedFerrolloysNESHAP,additionaldataregardingupdatedErametMariettamodelRussellKempto:JohnRego,ChuckFrench08/30/201208:23AMCcConradChin,“Jeff.McKinney©erametgroup.com”,“Imcafee@bdlaw.com”,“RLunn@fpiwv.com”,DarcieSmithThismessagehasbeenforwarded.Justtoclarify,andmakesurethereisnomisunderstanding,AlloftheFUGITIVEreleaseheights(fromshoproofvents),includingthefugitivesfromtheroofoftheFurnace18/MORbuilding,areat30.5meters.TheFurnace18/MORbaghouse[SourceIDMSEOO13,EmissionUnitIDF012,ProcessIDMOR-BH]isapositivepressurebaghousewhosereleasecharacteristicsarebestcharacterizedinthesamemannertheroofventsaretreated,ratherthanasapointsourcestack.Thatbaghouse’sreleaseheightis13.41meters,buttheseareNOT“fugitive”emissions.RussellENVIRONRussellS.Kemp,PEIPrincipalENVIRONInternationalCorporation1600ParkwoodCircleSuite310Atlanta,Georgia30339T:+1678.388.1654IF:+1770.874.5011IM:+1404.374.7836rkemp©environcorp.comFrom:JohnRego[mailto:jrego©JonesDay.com]Sent:Wednesday,August29,20125:33PMTo:ChuckFrenchCc:ConradChin;Jeff.McKinney@erametgroup.com;lmcafee@bdlaw.com;RussellKemp;RLunn@fpiwv.com;DarcieSmithSubject:Re:Fw:ProposedFerrolloysNESHAP,additionaldataregardingupdatedErametMariettamodelChuck:30.50metersforallbuttheFurnacel8/MORbaghouse,whichis13.41meters.JohnJohnRego•Environmental,Health&Safety901LAKESIDEAVENUECLEVELAND,OHIO44114DIRECT216.586.7542•FAX216.579.0212.JREGO@JONESDAY.COM
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Jesus GARCIA-RODRIGUEZ, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 05-51295

Conference Calendar.

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.

July 13, 2006.

Joseph H. Gay, Jr., Assistant U.S. Attorney, U.S. Attorney’s Office, Western District of Texas, San Antonio, TX, for Plaintiff-Appellee.

Judy Fulmer Madewell, Federal Public Defender’s Office, Western District of Texas, San Antonio, TX, for Defendant-Appellant.

*385Before DAVIS, BARKSDALE, and DeMOSS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: *

Appealing the Judgment in a Criminal Case, Jesus Garcia-Rodriguez raises arguments that are foreclosed by *AlmendarezTorres v. United States,*523 U.S. 224, 235, 118 S.Ct. 1219, 140 L.Ed.2d 350 (1998), which held that 8 U.S.C. § 1326(b)(2) is a penalty provision and not a separate criminal offense. The Government’s motion for summary affirmance is GRANTED, and the judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.

*

 Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.
```

[Congressional Bills 114th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 3711 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

114th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 3711

    To authorize the Secretary of the Interior to conduct a special 
 resource study of Chicano Park, located in San Diego, California, and 
                          for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            October 8, 2015

  Mr. Vargas introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                     Committee on Natural Resources

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
    To authorize the Secretary of the Interior to conduct a special 
 resource study of Chicano Park, located in San Diego, California, and 
                          for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Chicano Park Preservation Act''.

SEC. 2. SPECIAL RESOURCE STUDY.

    (a) Study.--The Secretary of the Interior shall conduct a special 
resource study of Chicano Park and its murals located in San Diego, 
California.
    (b) Contents.--In conducting the study under subsection (a), the 
Secretary shall--
            (1) evaluate the national significance of the site;
            (2) determine the suitability and feasibility of 
        designating the site as a National Historic Landmark or 
        Affiliated Area of the National Park System;
            (3) consider other alternatives for preservation, 
        protection, and interpretation of Chicano Park and its murals 
        by Federal, State, or local governmental entities, or private 
        and nonprofit organizations;
            (4) consult with interested Federal, State, or local 
        governmental entities, private and nonprofit organizations or 
        any other interested individuals; and
            (5) identify cost estimates for any development, 
        interpretation, operation, and maintenance associated with the 
        alternatives.
    (c) Applicable Law.--The study required under subsection (a) 
shall--
            (1) be conducted in accordance with section 100507 of title 
        54, United States Code; and
            (2) not withstanding section 2(c)(1), not consider any 
        options that involve Federal acquisition of lands, interests in 
        lands, or any other property related to the Chicano Park and 
        its murals.
    (d) Report.--Not later than 18 months after the date on which funds 
are first made available for the study under subsection (a), the 
Secretary shall submit to the Committee on Natural Resources of the 
House of Representatives and the Committee on Energy and Natural 
Resources of the Senate a report containing the results of the study 
and any conclusions and recommendations of the Secretary.
                                 <all>
```
### SUBCHAPTER XII—TRANSITION
Exhibit 32.1





Certification
of Principal Executive Officers


Pursuant
to


Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. 1350)





In
connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended
December 31, 2010 (the “Report”) of ATS Corporation (the “Registrant”), as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, I, Pamela
A. Little, and I, John A. Hassoun, Co-Chief Executive Officers of the
Registrant, hereby certify that:





(1)           The
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and





(2)           The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the
Registrant.




By:
              /s/ Pamela A.
LittlePamela A. Little
                Co-Chief Executive Officer
      and Chief Financial Officer
                (Principal Executive
    Officer)Date:
      February 17, 2011
              By:
              /s/ John A. HassounJohn
      A. Hassoun
                Co-Chief Executive Officer
                (Principal
      Executive Officer)
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                                      5
<MULTIPLIER>                           1,000,000


<S>                            <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                  3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>              DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-END>                   MAR-31-2000
<CASH>                                     1,154
<SECURITIES>                                  28
<RECEIVABLES>                              5,301
<ALLOWANCES>                                 330
<INVENTORY>                                  443
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                           7,120
<PP&E>                                    62,073
<DEPRECIATION>                            37,139
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                            44,355
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                     11,487
<BONDS>                                   10,880
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                   2,020
<OTHER-SE>                                13,677
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>              44,355
<SALES>                                      180
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                           6,487
<CGS>                                        189
<TOTAL-COSTS>                              3,374
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                           1,490
<LOSS-PROVISION>                              89
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           306
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            1,531
<INCOME-TAX>                                 530
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        1,001
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                               1,001
<EPS-BASIC>                                 0.53
<EPS-DILUTED>                               0.53





</TABLE>
### SUBCHAPTER IV—MULTILATERAL MEASURES TO UNDERMINE APARTHEID
### §§1213 to 1213d. Repealed. Pub. L. 105–220, title II, §251(a)(1), Aug. 7, 1998, 112 Stat. 1079

Section 1213, Pub. L. 89–750, title III, §381, as added Pub. L. 100–297, title II, §2102, Apr. 28, 1988, 102 Stat. 317, related to adult migrant farmworker and immigrant education.

Section 1213a, Pub. L. 89–750, title III, §382, as added Pub. L. 100–297, title II, §2102, Apr. 28, 1988, 102 Stat. 318, related to adult literacy volunteer training.

Section 1213b, Pub. L. 89–750, title III, §383, as added Pub. L. 100–297, title II, §2102, Apr. 28, 1988, 102 Stat. 318, related to State program analysis assistance and policy studies.

Section 1213c, Pub. L. 89–750, title III, §384, as added Pub. L. 100–297, title II, §2102, Apr. 28, 1988, 102 Stat. 319; amended Pub. L. 102–73, title I, §102(c), July 25, 1991, 105 Stat. 334; Pub. L. 103–382, title III, §335(b), Oct. 20, 1994, 108 Stat. 3966, related to national research activities and establishment of National Institute for Literacy.

Section 1213d, Pub. L. 89–750, title III, §385, as added Pub. L. 100–297, title II, §2102, Apr. 28, 1988, 102 Stat. 319, related to limitation on grants for sectarian instruction or religious worship or to a school or department of divinity.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Purpose and Findings Regarding Literacy Amendments and National Institute for Literacy

Pub. L. 102–73, title I, §102(a), (b), July 25, 1991, 105 Stat. 334, stated findings of Congress and purpose of amendment by section 102 of Pub. L. 102–73 to former section 1213c of this title, prior to repeal by Pub. L. 105–220, title II, §251(a)(2), Aug. 7, 1998, 112 Stat. 1079.

#### Family Literacy Public Broadcasting Program

Pub. L. 102–73, title III, §304, July 25, 1991, 105 Stat. 353, authorized Secretary to contract with the Corporation for Public Broadcasting to arrange for production and dissemination of family literacy programming and materials to assist parents in improving family literacy skills and language development, authorized appropriations, and required report to Congress, prior to repeal by Pub. L. 105–220, title II, §251(a)(2), Aug. 7, 1998, 112 Stat. 1079.
(No. 73-CC-17

#### Orville St. Clavey, Sheriff of Lake County, Illinois, Claimant, *vs.*State of Illinois, Respondent.

*Opinion filed July 26, 1973.*

Orville St. P. Clavey, Sheriff of Lake County, Illinois, Claimant, *pro se.*

William J. Scott, Attorney General; Saul R. Wexler, Assistant Attorney General, for Respondent.

Per Curiam.

This cause coming on to be heard on the Joint Stipulation of the parties hereto, and the Court being fully advised in the premises;

This court finds that this claim is for reimbursement of travel expenses incurred by the Claimant in connection with the return of prisoner Joseph Varanelli, Sr., from Phoenix, Arizona on May 31, 1972, and June 1, 1972, and the return of prisoner Leon Lloyd from Houston, Texas, on October 26 and 27,1971, authorized by the Department of Finance. The sole reason said claim was not previously paid is due to the lapse of the appropriation for the period during which the debt was incurred, the same having been confirmed by the written report of the Department of Finance, a copy of said report being attached to the Joint Stipulation of the parties.

There were not sufficient monies at the time the obligation was incurred from which this debt could have been paid, however, in *Fergus*vs. *Brady,*277 111. 272, the Illinois Supreme Court ruled that express authority is implied by law to extend an agency’s appropriation where the following factors are present: a) no accurate advance *22estimate of expenses is possible, and b) there is a requirement by law to provide the services. Accordingly, the instant claim meets the criteria established in the *Fergus*case and the claim is a just one.

It is hereby ordered that the sum of $965.79 (nine hundred and sixty-five dollars and seventy-nine cents) be awarded to Claimant in full satisfaction and any and all claims presented to the State of Illinois under the above captioned cause.
### §344. Emergency permit control

#### (a) Conditions on manufacturing, processing, etc., as health measure

Whenever the Secretary finds after investigation that the distribution in interstate commerce of any class of food may, by reason of contamination with micro-organisms during the manufacture, processing, or packing thereof in any locality, be injurious to health, and that such injurious nature cannot be adequately determined after such articles have entered interstate commerce, he then, and in such case only, shall promulgate regulations providing for the issuance, to manufacturers, processors, or packers of such class of food in such locality, of permits to which shall be attached such conditions governing the manufacture, processing, or packing of such class of food, for such temporary period of time, as may be necessary to protect the public health; and after the effective date of such regulations, and during such temporary period, no person shall introduce or deliver for introduction into interstate commerce any such food manufactured, processed, or packed by any such manufacturer, processor, or packer unless such manufacturer, processor, or packer holds a permit issued by the Secretary as provided by such regulations.

#### (b) Violation of permit; suspension and reinstatement

The Secretary is authorized to suspend immediately upon notice any permit issued under authority of this section if it is found that any of the conditions of the permit have been violated. The holder of a permit so suspended shall be privileged at any time to apply for the reinstatement of such permit, and the Secretary shall, immediately after prompt hearing and an inspection of the establishment, reinstate such permit if it is found that adequate measures have been taken to comply with and maintain the conditions of the permit, as originally issued or as amended.

#### (c) Inspection of permit-holding establishments

Any officer or employee duly designated by the Secretary shall have access to any factory or establishment, the operator of which holds a permit from the Secretary, for the purpose of ascertaining whether or not the conditions of the permit are being complied with, and denial of access for such inspection shall be ground for suspension of the permit until such access is freely given by the operator.

(June 25, 1938, ch. 675, §404, 52 Stat. 1048.)

#### **Executive Documents**

#### Transfer of Functions

For transfer of functions of Federal Security Administrator to Secretary of Health, Education, and Welfare [now Health and Human Services], and of Food and Drug Administration in the Department of Agriculture to Federal Security Agency, see notes set out under section 321 of this title.