alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
NOTE: This order is nonprecedential.



## United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit 2008-5120 EDWARD H. MILLER, BILLIE F. MILLER, GEORGE W. PLOWMAN (Individually and as the Personal Representative of the Estate of Elizabeth M. Plowman), ACACIO DOS REIS, and ELIZABETH DOS REIS, Plaintiffs-Appellants,

v. UNITED STATES,

Defendant-Appellee. Appeal from the United States Court of Federal Claims in 05-CV-508, Judge Lawrence J. Block. ON MOTION 

### ORDER The appellants move without opposition for a 6-day extension of time, until April 21, 2009, to file their response to the court's November 6, 2008 order. Upon consideration thereof, IT IS ORDERED THAT: The motion is granted. FOR THE COURT 

### APR 17 2009 /s/ Jan Horbalv Date

cc: Sallie W. Gladney, Esq. Deborah K. Snyder, Esq. s20 Jan Horbaly Clerk FIL E U.S. COURT OF AP

D PEALS FOR THE F EDERAL CIRCUIT APR 17 2009 ioltokku CLERK
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

DAY HIGH

 164

 162

 182

 182

 188

 182

 192

 189

 182

 179

 178

 178

 184

 178

 177

 177

 169

 166

 159

 166

 174

 168

 174

 177

 170

 182

 165

 150

 130

 131

 139

 149

 152

 148

 150

 160

 124

 151

 138

 145

 140

 142

 129

 119

 130

 98

 118

 119

 129

 126

 120

 106

 109

 85

 103

 96

 143

 149

 159

 162

 169

 168

 170

 172

 160

 164

 162

 162

 166

 158

 156

 146

 144

 137

 135

 136

 144

 146

 150

 133

 131

 135

 130

 122

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

FEBRUARY 2001 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: March 13, 2001

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

RIO VISTA ON THE SACRAMENTO RIVER
### §1434. Repealed. Pub. L. 96–60, title II, §203(a)(1), Aug. 15, 1979, 93 Stat. 398

Section, acts Jan. 27, 1948, ch. 36, title X, §1001, 62 Stat. 13; Apr. 5, 1952, ch. 159, §1, 66 Stat. 43; 1977 Reorg. Plan No. 2, §7(a)(1), 42 F.R. 62461, 91 Stat. 1637; 1978 Reorg. Plan No. 2, §102, eff. Jan. 1, 1979, 43 F.R. 36037, 92 Stat. 3783, provided for loyalty check of personnel. Pub. L. 87–256, §111(a)(2), Sept. 21, 1961, 75 Stat. 538, previously repealed this section insofar as it related to persons employed or assigned to duties under the Mutual Educational and Cultural Exchange Act of 1961.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date of Repeal

Repeal effective Oct. 1, 1979, see section 209 of Pub. L. 96–60, set out as an Effective Date of 1979 Amendment note under section 1471 of this title.
Exhibit 32.1

                                   Vicom, Inc.

                Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350
                             As Adopted Pursuant to
                  Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

      In  connection  with this  Quarterly  Report Form 10-Q,  Vicom,  Inc. (the
"Company")  for the period  ended  March 31,  2004,  I, James L.  Mandel,  Chief
Executive Officer of the Company, hereby certify,  pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
1350,  as adopted  pursuant  to Section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002,
that:

1.    This Periodic Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a)
      or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d));
      and
2.    The information  contained in the Periodic Report fairly presents,  in all
      material  respects,  the financial  condition and results of operations of
      the Company.


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Date: May 17, 2004                      By:

                                                      /s/ James L. Mandel
                                                     -----------------------
                                                          James L. Mandel
                                                     Chief Executive Officer
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

      In  connection  with this  Quarterly  Report Form 10-Q,  Vicom,  Inc. (the
"Company") for the period ended March 31, 2004, I, Steven M. Bell, Secretary and
Treasurer of the Company, hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

1.    This Periodic Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a)
      or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d));
      and
2.    The information  contained in the Periodic Report fairly presents,  in all
      material  respects,  the financial  condition and results of operations of
      the Company.

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Date: May 17, 2004                      By:

                                                       /s/ Steven M. Bell
                                                     -----------------------
                                                          Steven M. Bell
                                                     Chief Executive Officer

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
### §§1781, 1782. Repealed. Pub. L. 87–195, pt. III, §642(a)(2), Sept. 4, 1961, 75 Stat. 460

Section 1781, acts Aug. 26, 1954, ch. 937, ch. IV, §521, 68 Stat. 855; July 18, 1956, ch. 627, §10(a), 70 Stat. 560; Aug. 14, 1957, Pub. L. 85–141, §10(a), 71 Stat. 363; June 30, 1958, Pub. L. 85–477, ch. V, §501(24), (25), 72 Stat. 271, empowered the President to delegate his authority and provided for the promulgation of rules and regulations. See section 2381 of this title.

Section 1782, acts Aug. 26, 1954, ch. 937, ch. IV, §522, 68 Stat. 855; July 18, 1956, ch. 627, §10(b), 70 Stat. 560; June 30, 1958, Pub. L. 85–477, ch. V, §501(26), 72 Stat. 272, related to allocation and transfer of funds among Government agencies, utilization of services and facilities, reimbursement for military assistance, commodities, services, and facilities, establishment of accounts, and to charge of expenses to appropriation. See section 2392 of this title.
Editorial Note on Part 13
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 13 appear by T.D. ATF-449, 66 FR 19085, Apr. 13, 2001.

§ 13.71 Informal conferences. ( a ) *General.* As part of a timely filed written appeal of a notice of denial, a notice of proposed revocation, or a decision to revoke a certificate, an applicant or certificate holder may file a written request for an informal conference with the appropriate TTB officer deciding the appeal.
( b ) *Informal conference procedures.* The appropriate TTB officer and the applicant or certificate holder will agree upon a date for an informal conference. The informal conference is for purposes of discussion only, and no transcript shall be made. If the applicant or certificate holder wishes to rely upon arguments, facts, or evidence presented at the informal conference, he or she has 10 days after the date of the conference to incorporate such arguments, facts, or evidence in a written submission to the appropriate TTB officer.
[T.D. ATF-449, 66 FR 19086, Apr. 13, 2001]
EXHIBIT 32.1





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350



The undersigned, Albert G. Lowenthal, Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of Oppenheimer Holdings Inc. (the "Company"), hereby certifies that to his knowledge the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the period ended December 31, 2007 of the Company filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof  (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company for the period specified.



Signed at the New York, New York, this 7th day of March 2008.







Albert G. Lowenthal

Chairman and Chief Executive Officer
A-AA+Skip to content

                  - Home
                  - Compendium Statistics
                  - Event
                  - Archives
                  - Glossary
                  - Help
                  - Contact
                  - Research on Disability

Annual Disability Statistics Compendium

              - Home /
              - Archives /
              - 2012 Compendium Statistics /
              - 2012 Federal Government Spending and Employment /
              - 2012 13.5 Federal Government Spending and Employment—Federal Expenditures on Other Services

## Table 13.5: Federal Government Spending and Employment—Federal Expenditures on Other Services

----

----

 

----

#### 2012 Disability Compendium

                        - Home
                        - Compendium Statistics                           - Population and Prevelance
                          - Employment
                          - Time Trend Population Statistics
                          - Poverty
                          - Earnings
                          - Veterans
                          - Health Insurance Coverage
                          - Health
                          - Social Security Administration Programs
                          - Medicaid and Medicare
                          - Special Education
                          - Vocational Rehabilitation
                          - Federal Government Spending and Employment
                          - International Disability Statistics
                          - Population Statistics: Disability Type
                        - Event
                        - Archives                           - 2012 Compendium Statistics
                        - Glossary
                        - Help
                        - Contact
                        - Research on Disability

#### Funding for this project is made possible by:

 The Research and Training Center on Disability Statistics and Demographics (StatsRRTC), which is funded by the U.S. Department of Education, National Institute for Disability and Rehabilitation Research, under cooperative agreements H133B080012.

#### Stay Connected

**Institute on Disability**10 West Edge Drive, Suite 101Durham, NH 03824603.862.4320 | relay: 711 | [email protected]www.iod.unh.edu

© 2013. Institute on Disability.University of New Hampshire.
EXHIBIT 32.1

OFFICERS SECTION 1350 CERTIFICATIONS

Each of the undersigned officers of Transcontinental
Realty Investors, Inc., a Nevada corporation (the Company) hereby certifies that:



| | (i) | The Companys Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the six months ended September 30, 2007, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and
| | --- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (ii) | The information contained in the Companys Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the six months ended September 30, 2007, fairly presents in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Company, at and for the periods indicated.
| | ---- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                        |  |  |  |                                                                                                  
|----------------------- |  |  |  | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|Date: November 14, 2007 |  |  |  | /s/ Daniel J. Moos                                                                               
|                        |  |  |  | Daniel J. Moos                                                                                   
|                        |  |  |  | President and Chief Operating Officer (Principal
Executive Officer)                              
|                        |  | 
|Date: November 14, 2007 |  |  |  | /s/ Steven A. Abney                                                                              
|                        |  |  |  | Steven A. Abney                                                                                  
|                        |  |  |  | Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer (Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)
Order filed, August 12, 2019.

In The

Fourteenth Court of Appeals

____________

NO. 14-19-00564-CV

____________

PAUL E NUNU, Appellant

V.

NANCY NUNU RISK AND CHARLES L. NUNU, Appellee

On Appeal from the Probate Court No 2

Harris County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 416781

ORDER

The reporter’s record in this case was due July 30, 2019. See Tex. R. App. 

P. 35.1. The court has not received a request to extend time for filing the record. 

The record has not been filed with the court. Because the reporter’s record has not 

been filed timely, we issue the following order.

We order Donald G. Pylant, the court reporter, to file the record in this 

appeal within 15 days of the date of this order. 

PER CURIAM

Panel Consists of Justices Wise, Zimmerer and Spain.
Order entered November ,2012



### In The 

## Court of Appeals 

## ifth istritt of gtxas at allas

NO. 05-12-00904-CR ANDRES HERRERA, Appellant

V. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee On Appeal from the 265th Judicial District Court

Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. F08-11091-R



### ORDER The Court REINSTATES the appeal. On October 10, 2012, ordered the trial court to make findings regarding why appellant’s brief has not been filed. We ADOPT the findings that: (1) appellant has been removed from the country and returned to his native country; and (2) appellant has not communicated with counsel regarding the appeal. Based on the findings, we conclude appellant no longer desires to pursue the appeal.

ORDER the appeal submitted, without briefs and argument, as of the date of this 

### order, to a panel consisting of Justices Richter, Lang-Miers, and Myers. See Tex. R. App. P.

## 38.80 ).

DAVID L. BRIDGES JUSTICE
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY ELEVATION

 239.11

 246.86

 244.90

 240.05

 239.24

 239.88

 240.23

 239.43

 239.10

 239.27

 238.81

 238.65

 238.55

 238.75

 241.24

 239.53

 239.03

 240.70

 239.57

 240.84

 244.00

 240.86

 242.89

 240.92

 239.74

 239.20

 238.90

 238.73

 240.68

 240.80

 242.43

 363

 1,808

 1,324

 477

 379

 456

 502

 402

 362

 382

 331

 314

 304

 325

 645

 414

 354

 567

 418

 586

 1,130

 589

 917

 597

 439

 374

 340

 322

 564

 580

 837

STORAGE

-65

+1,445

-484

-847

-98

+77

+46

-100

-40

+20

-51

-17

-10

+21

+320

-231

-60

+213

-149

+168

+544

-541

+328

-320

-158

-65

-34

-18

+242

+16

+257

CHANGE

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 10,472

 34,061

 32,986

 7,002

 7,041

 25,786

 12,672

 12,110

 11,942

 10,261

 9,892

 9,043

 8,739

 13,065

 14,062

 10,573

 9,745

 14,646

 10,674

 12,902

 34,119

 16,007

 13,203

 15,843

 10,510

 9,808

 8,907

 850

 10,200

 16,800

 48,000

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

DECEMBER 2001 RED BLUFF DIVERSION RESERVOIR DAILY OPERATIONS RUN DATE: January 24, 2002

IN LAKE

CANAL

 ACRE-FEET

TOTALS +409 0 461,921

ACRE-FEET +409 0 916,220

SUMMARY

RELEASE (ACRE-FEET)

TOTAL 916,242

 428

RELEASE

RIVER

CORNING TO SACTO

CANAL

RELEASE C.F.S

TEHAMA

COLUSA

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 11

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 11

 22

CORNING CANAL 22

TEHAMA-COLUSA CANAL 0

TO SACTO RIVER 916,220

Table 9
#### § 233.4 Reconsideration of the reduction computation.

The Board shall periodically, but at least quarterly, examine the determinations and calculations made under §§ 233.1 and 233.2, in view of changes which may occur in the estimates used. If, as a result of this examination, the Board determines that the balance in the Dual Benefits Payments Account will be insufficient to pay benefits from that Account for the balance of the fiscal year at the established rate, the Board shall establish a new rate of reduction to be applied to benefits to be paid for the remaining months so that the balance in the Dual Benefits Payments Account will be sufficient to pay benefits for the remainder of the fiscal year. If, as a result of this examination, the Board finds that the balance in the Account is greater than would be required to pay benefits at the then applicable reduction percentage for the remainder of the fiscal year, the Board may, at its discretion, decrease the reduction percentage with respect to benefits to be paid for the remaining months.
#### Charles L. Benedict v. Citizens Bank of Plattsmouth.

Filed March 3, 1898.

No. 7920.

Action for Rent: Judgment, eob Defendant. The evidence in this case examined, and found not sufficient to sustain the findings of the district court.

Error from the district court of Cass county. Tried below before Chapman, J.

*Reversed.*

*Morris, Beekman & Marple*and *Hoagland & Hoagland,*for plaintiff in error.

*A. N.*Sullivan, *contra.*

*114Ryan, C.

In this action there was a judgment in favor of the defendant in the district court of Cass county. The subject-matter of the action was the rent of a certain room occupied by the bank between April 1 and December 1, 1893. The lease under which the bank held its possession was of date March 17, 1890, and was for a term of five years. It was executed by J. E. Riley, at that time the owner of the demised property. The provision for payments was in this language: “And the said party of the second part, in consideration of the leasing of the premises as above set forth, covenants and agrees with the party of the first part to pay to said party of the first part, as rent for the same, the sum of $900 per year, payable as follows: the sum of $75 monthly, the first payment to be made on the first day of April, 1890; said rent to be paid at the office of said Citizens Bank by placing said amount to the credit of said lessor on the first day of each month for the month previous.” The property, of which the above leased banking room was a part, was subsequently conveyed to the Plattsmouth Investment Company, by which company it was conveyed to plaintiff. There was a difficulty about clearing the title until April 1, 1893, when, this difficulty having been adjusted, the transfer was closed. J. E. Riley, when he made the lease in question, was owing the bank an amount in excess of the entire five -years’ rent, and the bank, by way of defense, insisted that it was entitled to apply the rent on this indebtedness, and the district court so found. In this finding the court erred. The lease was recorded, it is true, but the above quoted language in no way countenanced the idea that the bank was to apply the monthly payments in extinguishment of rent. On the contrary, the provision that each month’s rent was to be placed to the credit of the lessor, who might treat these sums as so much credited to his account as a depositor, to be drawn by means of his checks. If there was any *115understanding outside the lease that these payments of rent were to be applied in payment of a debt owing by Riley to the bank, there was no notice of this fact given plaintiff. His purchase was not from Riley, but from Riley’s grantee. When he purchased he was entitled to be substituted to the rights -of Riley, as defined by the terms of the written lease. The bank has not paid the money. It is simply withholding payment, under claim of right so to do. The judgment of the district court was not sustained by the evidence and accordingly is

Reversed.
### Part B—Strengthening Existing Law
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 03-41677 Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus ELEAZAR MARTINEZ-NATAREN, Defendant-Appellant.

-------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. L-03-CR-1100-ALL

-------------------- Before HIGGINBOTHAM, DAVIS, and PICKERING, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: * Eleazar Martinez-Nataren pleaded guilty and was convicted of illegal re-entry in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326(b)(2) and 6 U.S.C. §§ 202, 557. On appeal, Martinez-Nataren asserts that the “felony” and “aggravated felony” provisions of 8 U.S.C. § 1326(b)(1) and (2) are unconstitutional in light of Apprendi v. New Jersey , 530 U.S. 466 (2000). Martinez-Nataren concedes that his argument is foreclosed by Almendarez-Torres v. United States , 523 U.S. 224 (1998), but he United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit 

## F I L E D August 18, 2004 Charles R. Fulbruge III ClerkNo. 03-41677 -2- nevertheless seeks to preserve the issue for Supreme Court review in light of the decision in Apprendi
. Apprendi did not overrule Almendarez-Torres
. See Apprendi , 530 U.S. at 489-90; United States v. Dabeit , 231 F.3d 979, 984 (5th Cir. 2000). We must follow Almendarez-Torres unless and until the Supreme Court overrules it. See Dabeit , 231 F.3d at 984. Accordingly, the judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.
Document headings vary by document type but may contain
                    the following: the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document
the number of the CFR title and the number of each part
                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly
                      related to
the agency docket number / agency internal file number
the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in
                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory
                      Actions See the
                    Document Drafting Handbook
                    for more details.
 Department of Justice Drug Enforcement Administration
 Pursuant to § 1301.33(a), Title 21 of the Code of Federal Regulations (CFR), this is notice that on November 3, 2010, Noramco Inc., 500 Swedes Landing Road, Wilmington, Delaware 19801-4485, made application by letter to the Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA) as a bulk manufacturer of the following basic classes of controlled substances: Drug
ScheduleAmphetamine (1100)
IIPhenylacetone (8501)
II
 The company plans to manufacture the listed controlled substances in bulk for distribution to its customers. Any other such applicant, and any person who is presently registered with DEA to manufacture such substances, may file comments or objections to the issuance of the proposed registration pursuant to 21 CFR 1301.33(a). Any such written comments or objections should be addressed, in quintuplicate, to the Drug Enforcement Administration, Office of Diversion Control, 
                    **Federal Register**
                     Representative (ODL), 8701 Morrissette Drive, Springfield, Virginia 22152; and must be filed no later than June 20, 2011. Dated: April 13, 2011. Joseph T. Rannazzisi, Deputy Assistant Administrator, Office of Diversion Control, Drug Enforcement Administration.


[FR Doc. 2011-9610 Filed 4-19-11; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 4410-09-P