alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 155 (Friday, August 10, 2012)]
[Notices]
[Page 47864]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2012-19600]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

Bureau of Safety and Environmental Enforcement

Ocean Energy Safety Advisory Committee (OESC); Notice of Meeting

AGENCY: Bureau of Safety and Environmental Enforcement (BSEE), 
Interior.

ACTION: Notice of meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: OESC will meet at the Anchorage Marriott Downtown Hotel in 
Anchorage, Alaska.

DATES: Wednesday, August 29, 2012, from 8 a.m. to 5 p.m. and Thursday, 
August 30, 2012, from 8 a.m. to 1 p.m.

ADDRESSES: Anchorage Marriott Downtown Hotel, 820 West 7th Avenue, 
Anchorage, Alaska 99501.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mr. Joseph R. Levine at the Bureau of 
Safety and Environmental Enforcement, 381 Elden Street, Herndon, 
Virginia 20170-4187. He can be reached by telephone at (703) 787-1033 
or by electronic mail at joseph.levine@bsee.gov.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: OESC consists of representatives from 
industry, Federal Government agencies, non-governmental organizations, 
and the academic community. It provides policy advice to the Secretary 
of the Interior through the Director of BSEE on matters relating to 
ocean energy safety, including, but not limited to drilling and 
workplace safety, well intervention and containment, and oil spill 
response.
    The agenda for Wednesday, August 29, will address the OESC 
Subcommittees' activities to date on: oil spill prevention, spill 
containment, spill response and safety management systems; safety 
culture; blowout preventers (BOP); and a proposed Ocean Energy Safety 
Institute.
    The agenda for Thursday, August 30, will address interim 
recommendations presented to the OESC from its four subcommittees for 
consideration and action, including lessons learned and next steps 
forward.
    The meeting is open to the public. Approximately 100 visitors can 
be accommodated on a first-come-first-served basis. Members of the 
public will have the opportunity to comment on the activities of OESC 
and related topics on a first-come-first-served basis during the time 
allotted for public comment and may submit written comments to the OESC 
during the meeting or by email to the Committee at OESC@bsee.gov.
    Minutes of the Ocean Energy Safety Advisory Committee meeting will 
be available for public inspection on the Committee's Web site at: 
http://www.bsee.gov/About-BSEE/Public-Engagement/OESC/Index.aspx.

    Authority: Federal Advisory Committee Act, Pub. L. 92-463, 5 
U.S.C. Appendix 1, and the Office of Management and Budget's 
Circular No. A-63, Revised.

    Dated: August 1, 2012.
James A. Watson,
Director, Bureau of Safety and Environmental Enforcement.
[FR Doc. 2012-19600 Filed 8-9-12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-MR-P
```
Exhibit 5.3
 
 July 1, 2011Amy J. Tawney
    
    
    
    E-Mail Address:Telephone  (304) 347-1123
    
    
    
    atawney@bowlesrice.comFacsimile  (304) 343-3058
 
 Re:
    
    Registration of 9.50% Senior Secured NotesDue 2016 of McJunkin Red Man Corporation
  WV Guarantors Issuer Notes Securities Act Registration Statement Indenture




---



##### 








---



##### 








---



#####
#### § 323.5 Submitting proposed plan for Board approval.

An employer shall submit each proposed plan, or a proposed revision to an existing plan, to the Director of Unemployment and Sickness Insurance, Railroad Retirement Board, 844 Rush Street, Chicago, Illinois 60611. The Director shall determine whether the plan or revision conforms to this part. Approval shall be effective as of the effective date of the plan. If not approved, the Director will advise the employer in which particular respects the proposed plan or revision does not conform to this part.
### §1523. Definitions

In this subchapter:

#### (1) Administrator

The term "Administrator" means the Administrator appointed by the Director under section 1531(c) of this title.

#### (2) Advisory Commission

The term "Advisory Commission" means the Advisory Commission established under section 1541 1 of this title.

#### (3) Community

The term "community" shall have the meaning provided that term by the Administrator, in consultation with the Advisory Commission.

#### (4) Director

The term "Director" means the Director of the Office of National Drug Control Policy.

#### (5) Eligible coalition

The term "eligible coalition" means a coalition that meets the applicable criteria under section 1532(a) of this title.

#### (6) Grant recipient

The term "grant recipient" means the recipient of a grant award under section 1532 of this title.

#### (7) Nonprofit organization

The term "nonprofit organization" means an organization described under section 501(c)(3) of title 26 that is exempt from taxation under section 501(a) of title 26.

#### (8) Program

The term "Program" means the program established under section 1531(a) of this title.

#### (9) Substance use and misuse

The term "substance use and misuse" means—

(A) the illegal use or misuse of drugs, including substances for which a listing is effect 2 under any of schedules I through V under section 812 of this title;

(B) the misuse of inhalants or over-the-counter drugs; or

(C) the use of alcohol, tobacco, or other related product as such use is prohibited by State or local law.

#### (10) Youth

The term "youth" shall have the meaning provided that term by the Administrator, in consultation with the Advisory Commission.

(Pub. L. 100–690, title I, §1023, as added Pub. L. 105–20, §2(a)(2), June 27, 1997, 111 Stat. 225; amended Pub. L. 115–271, title VIII, §8203(b)(2), Oct. 24, 2018, 132 Stat. 4111; Pub. L. 116–74, §2(c)(1)(A)(ii)(II), Nov. 27, 2019, 133 Stat. 1157.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

Section 1541 of this title, referred to in par. (2), was repealed by Pub. L. 115–271, title VIII, §8203(b)(5), Oct. 24, 2018, 132 Stat. 4112.

#### Amendments

2019—Par. (9). Pub. L. 116–74, §2(c)(1)(A)(ii)(II), made technical amendment to directory language of Pub. L. 115–271, §8203(b)(2). See 2018 Amendment note below.

2018—Par. (9). Pub. L. 115–271, §8203(b)(2), as amended by Pub. L. 116–74, §2(c)(1)(A)(ii)(II), added par. (9) and struck out former par. (9) which defined "substance abuse".

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date of 2019 Amendment

Amendment by Pub. L. 116–74 effective as if included in the enactment of subtitle K of title VIII of Pub. L. 115–271, see section 2(c)(2) of Pub. L. 116–74, set out as a note under section 1522 of this title.

1 See References in Text note below.

2 So in original.
§ 404.272 Indexes we use to measure the rise in the cost-of-living. ( a ) *The bases.* To measure increases in the cost-of-living for annual automatic increase purposes, we use either: ( 1 ) The revised Consumer Price Index (CPI) for urban wage earners and clerical workers as published by the Department of Labor, or
( 2 ) The average wage index (AWI), which is the average of the annual total wages that we use to index (*i.e.*, update) a worker's past earnings when we compute his or her primary insurance amount (§ 404.211(c)).
( b ) *Effect of the OASDI fund ratio.* Which of these indexes we use to measure increases in the cost-of-living depends on the Old-Age, Survivors, and Disability Insurance (OASDI) fund ratio.
( c ) *OASDI fund ratio for years after 1984.* For purposes of cost-of-living increases, the OASDI fund ratio is the ratio of the combined assets in the Federal Old-Age and Survivors Insurance Trust Fund and the Federal Disability Insurance Trust Fund (see section 201 of the Social Security Act) on January 1 of a given year, to the estimated expenditures from the Funds in the same year. The January 1 balance consists of the assets (*i.e.*, government bonds and cash) in the Federal Old-Age and Survivors Insurance Trust Fund and the Federal Disability Insurance Trust Fund, plus Federal Insurance Contributions Act (FICA) and Self-Employment Contributions Act (SECA) taxes transferred to these trust funds on January 1 of the given year, minus the outstanding amounts (principal and interest) owed to the Federal Hospital Insurance Trust Fund as a result of interfund loans. Estimated expenditures are amounts we expect to pay from the Old-Age and Survivors Insurance and the Disability Insurance Trust Funds during the year, including the net amount that we pay into the Railroad Retirement Account, but excluding principal repayments and interest payments to the Hospital Insurance Trust Fund and transfer payments between the Old-Age and Survivors Insurance and the Disability Insurance Trust Funds. The ratio as calculated under this rule is rounded to the nearest 0.1 percent.
( d ) *Which index we use.* We use the CPI if the OASDI fund ratio is 15.0 percent or more for any year from 1984 through 1988, and if the ratio is 20.0 percent or more for any year after 1988. We use either the CPI or the AWI, depending on which has the lower percentage increase in the applicable measuring period (see § 404.274), if the OASDI fund ratio is less than 15.0 percent for any year from 1984 through 1988, and if the ratio is less than 20.0 percent for any year after 1988. For example, if the OASDI fund ratio for a year is 17.0 percent, the cost-of-living increase effective December of that year will be based on the CPI.
[51 FR 12603, Apr. 14, 1986]
|  (1) | The      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;and |
|-----------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|  (2) | The      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the      Company. |
|-----------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|                |   |                                         |   |
|---------------------|--------|----------------------------------------------|--------|
| March      15, 2010 |   | /s/ Yale      Farar           |   |
|                |   | Yale      Farar                              |   |
|                |   | President      (Principal Executive Officer) |   |
|                |   |                                         |   |

|                |   |                                                               |   |
|---------------------|--------|--------------------------------------------------------------------|--------|
| March      15, 2010 |   | /s/ Mitchell      W. Turk       |   |
|                |   | Mitchell      W. Turk                                              |   |
|                |   | Chief      Financial Officer                                       |   |
|                |   |                                                               |   |

----
### SUBCHAPTER II—GOVERNING BODIES OF THE SERVICES
[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 75 (Tuesday, April 19, 2011)]
[Notices]
[Pages 21911-21912]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2011-9427]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY

Federal Emergency Management Agency

[Internal Agency Docket No. FEMA-3318-EM; Docket ID FEMA-2011-0001]


North Dakota; Amendment No. 1 to Notice of an Emergency 
Declaration

AGENCY: Federal Emergency Management Agency, DHS.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This notice amends the notice of an emergency declaration for 
the State of North Dakota (FEMA-3318-EM), dated April 7, 2011, and 
related determinations.

DATES: Effective Date: April 13, 2011.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Peggy Miller, Office of Response and 
Recovery, Federal Emergency Management Agency, 500 C Street, SW., 
Washington, DC 20472, (202) 646-3886.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The notice of an emergency declaration for 
the State of North Dakota is hereby amended to include the following 
areas among those areas determined to have been adversely affected by 
the event declared an emergency by the President in his declaration of 
April 7, 2011.

    Grand Forks, Pembina, Walsh, and Ward Counties for emergency 
protective measures (Category B), limited to direct Federal 
assistance, under the Public Assistance program.
    The following Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Numbers 
(CFDA) are to be used for reporting and drawing funds: 97.030, 
Community Disaster Loans; 97.031, Cora Brown Fund; 97.032, Crisis 
Counseling; 97.033, Disaster Legal Services; 97.034,

[[Page 21912]]

Disaster Unemployment Assistance (DUA); 97.046, Fire Management 
Assistance Grant; 97.048, Disaster Housing Assistance to Individuals 
and Households In Presidentially Declared Disaster Areas; 97.049, 
Presidentially Declared Disaster Assistance--Disaster Housing 
Operations for Individuals and Households; 97.050 Presidentially 
Declared Disaster Assistance to Individuals and Households--Other 
Needs; 97.036, Disaster Grants--Public Assistance (Presidentially 
Declared Disasters); 97.039, Hazard Mitigation Grant.

W. Craig Fugate,
Administrator, Federal Emergency Management Agency.
[FR Doc. 2011-9427 Filed 4-18-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9111-23-P
### Part 6—Tolls for Use of Panama Canal
1fDS7

UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

~ ~S~7 ~ 75 Hawthorne Street

1r~~ -~:‘ji:~- ~ San Francisco, CA 94105

~t PRO~’

October 17, 2014

Marcia Hadenfeldt, Library Assistant

Montezuma Creek Library and Bluff Library, San Juan County

P.O. Box 99

Bluff UT 84512

Subject: Public documents at the Montezuma Creek Library and Bluff Library for public

inspection

Dear Ms. Hadenfeldt:

The U. S. Environmental Protection Agency sent you a package containing a number of documents

regarding the McElmo Creek Unit Oil Production Facility on the Navajo Nation Indian Reservation

near the city ofAneth, San Juan County, Utah. Two of these documents contained an error, and need

to be replaced. Please replace the following documents in the package previously sent to you with

the enclosed documents:

1. PUBLIC INFORMATION SHEET

2. AMBIENT AIR QUALITY IMPACT REPORT & FACT SHEET

Your assistance with this matter is greatly appreciated. Feel free to contact me at (415) 947-4156 or

ke11y.shaheerah(~epa.gov if you have any questions.

Sincerely,

Shaheerah Kelly, Environmental Engineer

Permits Office

Air Division

Enclosures
#### § 404.1045 Employee expenses.

Amounts that your employer pays you specifically—either as advances or reimbursements—for traveling or for other ordinary and necessary expenses incurred, or reasonably expected to be incurred, in your employer's business are not wages. The employer must identify these travel and other expenses either by making a separate payment or by specifically stating the separate amounts if both wages and expense allowances are combined in a single payment.
§ 211.15 Verification of compensation claimed. Compensation claimed by an employee, which is not credited in the records of the Board, must be verified to the satisfaction of the Board before it may be credited. An employee's claim to compensation not credited shall be processed as follows: ( a ) If the compensation claimed is in excess of the maximum creditable amounts defined in § 211.13 of this part, the Director of the Bureau of Research and Employment Accounts shall inform the employee that the compensation claimed is not creditable.
( b ) If the compensation is claimed within four years from the date the compensation was required to be reported to the Board as prescribed in § 209.6 of this chapter, the Director of Research and Employment Accounts shall contact the employer requesting a review of their records, and if the employee's claim is correct, the employer will submit an adjustment crediting the employee with the compensation claimed. If the employer states that the employee's claim is incorrect, the employee will be requested to submit check stubs to show railroad retirement taxes withheld from the compensation claimed. Upon receipt of the check stubs, the proof will be sent to the employer along with a request for the employer to submit an adjustment crediting the employee with the compensation claimed.
[49 FR 46732, Nov. 28, 1984, as amended at 53 FR 17185, May 16, 1988. Redesignated at 58 FR 45251, Aug. 27, 1993]
Auke Bay Fisheries How Successful Was Removing
Laboratory Eight Year Old Oil ?

a Dann Kner Grenier) fess beens renee Gum ce

was removed from
Chenega area beaches
in 1997

Itis difficult to clean
an

BUT where there was no access to oil,
removal did not work well.

‘Exxon Valdez oil Where there was access to oil,

well

Intertidal biota did NOT suffer major damage.

Intertidal mussels =F
were BRIEFLY contaminated.

The 1997 Sleepy Bay cleaning
1. Removed accessible oil

2. Did negligible biological damage
The 1997/98 winter storms at Sleepy Bay

4. Moved large boulders
2. Exposed previously inaccessi

le
[DO NOT PUBLISH] IN THE UN ITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELE VENTH CIRCUIT

__ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ No. 1 0- 11 84 3 Non -Arg um en t Ca le nd ar

__ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ D.C. Dock etNo. 3 :0 9- cr-0 00 90 -LC-1
UNITED STAT ES OF AMERIC A, ll ll ll ll ll ll ll ll ll ll l Pl ai nt iff -Ap pe ll ee, vers us AARON JOSEPH BRUNSON, ll ll ll ll ll ll ll ll ll ll l Defen da nt -Ap pe ll an t.

__ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ App eal fro m

th e Uni te d S ta te s Di st ric t Co ur t forth e North ern Dis tri ctof F lo rid a

__ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ (J ul y 27 , 20 12 ) Befo re TJ OFLAT, JORDAN andANDERSON, Circu itJu dg es . PER CURI AM:

Case: 10-11843 Date Filed: 07/27/2012 Page: 1 of 3Aaro n J os ep h B ru ns on ap pe al s h is co nv ic ti on forbe in g afel on in

po ss es si on of afir earm , in vi ol at io n o f 18 U.S.C. §§ 92 2( g) (1 ). He arg ue s t ha t, be cau se th e st ip ul at io n h e h aden te redin to wit h t he Gov ern m en t—th athe was a co nv ic te d fe lo n—was no t ad m it te d i nt o e vi de nc e an d p ub li sh edto th e jury at tr ia l, th e jury hadno ev id en ce b efo re i t o n wh ic h t o fi ndhi m gu il ty. Ther efo re, t he ev id en ce was in su ffi ci en t t o s up po rt h is co nv ic ti on . W e rev ie w de no vo whet he r th ere i s s uf fic ie ntev id en ce i n t he reco rdto supp ort a ju ry ’s ver di ctin a cri m in al tri al . Uni te d Sta tes v. J imi ne z , 56 4 F .3d 12 80 , 12 84 (11 th Cir . 20 09 ). To o bt ai n aco nv ic ti on forbe in g afel on in po ss es si on of afir earm , th e g ov ern m en t m us t p ro ve th at(1) th e d efen da ntwas a co nv ic te d fe lo n, (2 ) th e d efen da ntkn owi ng ly pos se ss eda fi rearm , and(3) th e fir earm was i n o r affe ct in g i nt ers ta te co m m erce . 18 U.S.C. § 9 22 (g )(1 ); Uni te d St at es v. Dele vea ux , 20 5 F .3d12 92 , 12 96 -9 7 (1 1t h C ir. 2 00 0) . Bru ns on co nc ed es th ataft er t he jury was sel ect ed , hi s l awy er an d t he Ass is ta ntU. S. Atto rn ey

in fo rm edth e Dis tri ctCo ur t t ha t t he y ha d e nt eredin to a st ip ul at io n t ha t Brun so n h adpre vi ou sl y be en co nv ic te d o f a fel on y an d t ha t h is ci vi l ri gh ts ha d n otbe enres to red . Bru ns on ackno wled ge d t he st ip ul at io n a ndth e co ur t ac cep te d i t. By st ip ul at in g t o fe lo n s ta tu s, a d efen da ntwaiv es th e ri gh t t o requi re t he Gov ern m en t p ro ve hi s fe lo n s ta tu s. Uni te d Sta te s v. Ha rd in , 13 9 F .3d 2 Case: 10-11843 Date Filed: 07/27/2012 Page: 2 of 381 3, 8 16 (11 th Cir . 19 98 ).

AFFIR MED.

3 Case: 10-11843 Date Filed: 07/27/2012 Page: 3 of 3
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

DAY HIGH

 61

 60

 61

 60

 75

 91

 125

 132

 127

 124

 113

 66

 60

 67

 63

 63

 64

 69

 62

 64

 62

 62

 63

 62

 62

 60

 61

 62

 63

 62

 59

 58

 59

 58

 59

 59

 94

 108

 105

 97

 62

 57

 56

 57

 58

 58

 59

 59

 59

 55

 55

 54

 55

 55

 55

 55

 56

 57

 57

 56

 60

 59

 60

 59

 61

 70

 108

 114

 110

 104

 88

 58

 57

 58

 59

 60

 60

 60

 60

 58

 56

 56

 57

 56

 57

 56

 57

 58

 58

 58

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

SEPTEMBER 2006 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: October 3, 2006

HIGH LOW MEAN

 63.1

 62.7

 62.5

 62.1

 62.5

 64.0

 67.2

 68.1

 67.4

 68.0

 66.5

 62.7

 62.8

 61.9

 60.0

 60.1

 59.8

 60.2

 60.9

 60.1

 60.4

 60.4

 60.2

 60.4

 59.9

 60.1

 60.4

 60.2

 59.9

 59.3

 60.8

 60.4

 60.0

 59.8

 60.1

 60.5

 63.0

 65.3

 64.5

 64.5

 63.0

 60.3

 60.4

 60.1

 58.0

 57.4

 57.3

 58.1

 58.9

 58.6

 58.1

 58.5

 58.2

 58.2

 58.1

 58.2

 58.2

 58.2

 58.1

 58.1

 62.1

 61.7

 61.5

 61.2

 61.4

 62.3

 65.0

 66.5

 66.0

 66.1

 65.5

 61.7

 61.8

 61.0

 59.1

 58.7

 58.6

 59.2

 59.9

 59.5

 59.3

 59.5

 59.2

 59.3

 59.2

 59.2

 59.4

 59.3

 59.1

 58.6

HIGH LOW MEAN

 9.2

 8.8

 8.7

 8.6

 8.5

 8.9

 8.6

 7.9

 7.9

 7.8

 7.8

 8.5

 7.9

 7.8

 8.5

 8.3

 8.2

 8.2

 8.2

 8.1

 8.6

 10.0

 9.8

 9.8

 9.7

 9.5

 9.4

 9.4

 9.4

 9.3

 8.6

 8.4

 8.3

 8.3

 8.1

 7.2

 6.5

 7.6

 7.6

 7.5

 7.5

 7.8

 7.7

 7.6

 7.6

 8.2

 8.1

 8.1

 8.1

 8.0

 7.6

 7.6

 9.4

 9.2

 9.2

 9.0

 9.0

 9.0

 9.0

 9.1

 8.9

 8.7

 8.5

 8.4

 8.3

 8.0

 7.4

 7.8

 7.7

 7.7

 7.6

 7.9

 7.8

 7.7

 7.9

 8.3

 8.2

 8.2

 8.1

 8.1

 7.9

 8.7

 9.6

 9.5

 9.5

 9.3

 9.2

 9.2

 9.1

 9.2

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

RIPON ON THE STANISLAUS RIVER

 ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS WATER TEMPERATURE, DEG DISSOLVED OXYZEN, PPM
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

DAY HIGH

 236

 245

 247

 252

 252

 249

 245

 239

 239

 240

 241

 249

 247

 255

 279

 262

 252

 241

 234

 232

 232

 224

 218

 230

 220

 221

 205

 204

 208

 199

 206

 209

 213

 220

 224

 224

 221

 219

 218

 220

 227

 231

 227

 226

 224

 224

 219

 212

 213

 206

 198

 200

 193

 192

 193

 194

 190

 178

 213

 219

 220

 226

 230

 232

 229

 226

 226

 226

 230

 237

 238

 237

 240

 238

 234

 228

 222

 218

 216

 209

 207

 207

 206

 205

 201

 196

 191

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

FEBRUARY 2012 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: March 13, 2012

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

RIO VISTA ON THE SACRAMENTO RIVER
#### In the Matter of the Claim of Frank Stewart, Appellant, against Yerden Brothers et al., Respondents. State Industrial Board, Respondent.

All concur.