alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
### §871a. Semiannual reports to Congress

#### (a) In general

The Attorney General shall, on a semiannual basis, submit to the congressional committees and organizations specified in subsection (b) reports that—

(1) describe the allocation of the resources of the Drug Enforcement Administration and the Federal Bureau of Investigation for the investigation and prosecution of alleged violations of the Controlled Substances Act [21 U.S.C. 801 et seq.] involving methamphetamine; and

(2) the measures being taken to give priority in the allocation of such resources to such violations involving—

(A) persons alleged to have imported into the United States substantial quantities of methamphetamine or scheduled listed chemicals (as defined pursuant to the amendment made by section 711(a)(1)); 1

(B) persons alleged to have manufactured methamphetamine; and

(C) circumstances in which the violations have endangered children.

#### (b) Congressional committees

The congressional committees and organizations referred to in subsection (a) are—

(1) in the House of Representatives, the Committee on the Judiciary, the Committee on Energy and Commerce, and the Committee on Government Reform; and

(2) in the Senate, the Committee on the Judiciary, the Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation, and the Caucus on International Narcotics Control.

(Pub. L. 109–177, title VII, §736, Mar. 9, 2006, 120 Stat. 271.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

The Controlled Substances Act, referred to in subsec. (a)(1), is title II of Pub. L. 91–513, Oct. 27, 1970, 84 Stat. 1242, which is classified principally to this subchapter. For complete classification of this Act to the Code, see Short Title note set out under section 801 of this title and Tables.

Section 711(a)(1), referred to in subsec. (a)(2)(A), is section 711(a)(1) of Pub. L. 109–177, which amended section 802 of this title.

#### Codification

Section was enacted as part of the USA PATRIOT Improvement and Reauthorization Act of 2005 and also as part of the Combat Methamphetamine Epidemic Act of 2005, and not as part of the Controlled Substances Act which comprises this subchapter.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Change of Name

Committee on Government Reform of House of Representatives changed to Committee on Oversight and Government Reform of House of Representatives by House Resolution No. 6, One Hundred Tenth Congress, Jan. 5, 2007. Committee on Oversight and Government Reform of House of Representatives changed to Committee on Oversight and Reform of House of Representatives by House Resolution No. 6, One Hundred Sixteenth Congress, Jan. 9, 2019. Committee on Oversight and Reform of House of Representatives changed to Committee on Oversight and Accountability of House of Representatives by House Resolution No. 5, One Hundred Eighteenth Congress, Jan. 9, 2023.

1 See References in Text note below.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

DAY HIGH

 220

 179

 164

 207

 244

 162

 154

 161

 147

 148

 133

 119

 142

 170

 184

 174

 167

 151

 171

 188

 199

 202

 209

 182

 181

 181

 183

 176

 223

 240

 135

 118

 111

 104

 104

 97

 97

 99

 100

 99

 98

 93

 94

 105

 108

 110

 115

 127

 132

 149

 146

 125

 126

 138

 132

 133

 130

 142

 163

 215

 173

 142

 134

 139

 148

 127

 118

 121

 113

 116

 117

 105

 118

 129

 131

 132

 132

 138

 145

 168

 163

 152

 147

 151

 150

 150

 146

 154

 186

 223

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

JUNE 2019 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: July 1, 2019

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

DELTA MENDOTA CANAL AT CHECK 13 (O'NEILL)
### Part O—College Partnership Grants
§ 404.1619 Quick disability determination process. ( a ) If we identify a claim as one involving a high degree of probability that the individual is disabled, and we expect that the individual's allegations will be easily and quickly verified, we will refer the claim to the State agency for consideration under the quick disability determination process pursuant to this section and § 404.1620(c).
( b ) If we refer a claim to the State agency for a quick disability determination, a designated quick disability determination examiner must do all of the following: ( 1 ) Subject to the provisions in paragraph (c) of this section, make the disability determination after consulting with a State agency medical or psychological consultant if the State agency disability examiner determines consultation is appropriate or if consultation is required under § 404.1526(c). The State agency may certify the disability determination forms to us without the signature of the medical or psychological consultant.
( 2 ) Make the quick disability determination based only on the medical and nonmedical evidence in the file.
( 3 ) Subject to the provisions in paragraph (c) of this section, make the quick disability determination by applying the rules in subpart P of this part.
( c ) If the quick disability determination examiner cannot make a determination that is fully favorable, or if there is an unresolved disagreement between the disability examiner and the medical or psychological consultant (except when a disability examiner makes the determination alone under § 404.1615(c)(3)), the State agency will adjudicate the claim using the regularly applicable procedures in this subpart.
[72 FR 51177, Sept. 6, 2007, as amended at 75 FR 62682, Oct. 13, 2010]
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

DAY HIGH

 158

 157

 156

 157

 153

 149

 146

 150

 153

 158

 158

 156

 156

 158

 167

 191

 191

 169

 161

 163

 156

 150

 151

 153

 166

 164

 156

 174

 164

 161

 147

 150

 151

 150

 143

 143

 139

 138

 140

 141

 144

 149

 151

 152

 152

 151

 148

 147

 144

 141

 140

 138

 139

 139

 141

 139

 135

 132

 132

 131

 152

 153

 153

 152

 148

 145

 143

 143

 146

 150

 153

 154

 154

 154

 155

 159

 157

 152

 150

 147

 144

 142

 142

 142

 146

 144

 142

 142

 139

 137

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

JUNE 2018 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: July 16, 2018

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

RIO VISTA ON THE SACRAMENTO RIVER
§ 6.100 Participation in retailer association activities. The following acts by an industry member participating in retailer association activities do not constitute a means to induce within the meaning of section 105(b)(3) of the Act: ( a ) Displaying its products at a convention or trade show;
( b ) Renting display booth space if the rental fee is the same as paid by all exhibitors at the event;
( c ) Providing its own hospitality which is independent from association sponsored activities;
( d ) Purchasing tickets to functions and paying registration fees if the payments or fees are the same as paid by all attendees, participants or exhibitors at the event; and
( e ) Making payments for advertisements in programs or brochures issued by retailer associations at a convention or trade show if the total payments made by an industry member for all such advertisements do not exceed $300 per year for any retailer association.
[T.D. ATF-364, 60 FR 20424, Apr. 26, 1995]
#### § 345.203 Merger or combination of employers.

In the event of a merger or combination of two or more employers, or an employer and non-employer, the individual employer record of the employer surviving the merger (or any person that becomes an employer as the result of the merger or combination) shall consist of the combination of the individual employer records of the entities participating in the merger. Where the person surviving the merger is an existing employer under part 202 of this chapter, the individual employer record for the surviving employer will not be updated to reflect the combined record until the calendar year following the year of the Board's determination. Where the entity surviving the merger becomes an employer under part 202 of this chapter by virtue of the merger, the individual employer record shall consist of the combined record effective with its employer effective date.

[70 FR 42489, July 25, 2005]
#### § 404.830 Notice of removal or reduction of your wages.

If we remove or reduce an amount of wages entered on the record of your earnings, we will notify you of this correction if we previously notified you of the amount of your wages for the period involved. We will notify your survivor if we previously notified you or your survivor of the amount of your earnings for the period involved.
§ 404.1546 Responsibility for assessing your residual functional capacity. ( a ) *Responsibility for assessing residual functional capacity at the State agency.* When a State agency medical or psychological consultant and a State agency disability examiner make the disability determination as provided in § 404.1615(c)(1) of this part, a State agency medical or psychological consultant(s) is responsible for assessing your residual functional capacity. When a State agency disability examiner makes a disability determination alone as provided in § 404.1615(c)(3), the disability examiner is responsible for assessing your residual functional capacity.
( b ) *Responsibility for assessing residual functional capacity in the disability hearings process.* If your case involves a disability hearing under § 404.914, a disability hearing officer is responsible for assessing your residual functional capacity. However, if the disability hearing officer's reconsidered determination is changed under § 404.918, the Associate Commissioner for the Office of Disability Determinations or his or her delegate is responsible for assessing your residual functional capacity.
( c ) *Responsibility for assessing residual functional capacity at the administrative law judge hearing or Appeals Council level.* If your case is at the administrative law judge hearing level or at the Appeals Council review level, the administrative law judge or the administrative appeals judge at the Appeals Council (when the Appeals Council makes a decision) is responsible for assessing your residual functional capacity.
[68 FR 51162, Aug. 26, 2003, as amended at 71 FR 16445, Mar. 31, 2006; 75 FR 62681, Oct. 13, 2010; 76 FR 24807, May 3, 2011]
§ 404.1342 Limits on granting World War II and post-World War II wage credits. ( a ) You get wage credits for World War II or post-World War II active service only if the use of the wage credits results in entitlement to a monthly benefit, a higher monthly benefit, or a lump-sum death payment.
( b ) You may get wage credits for active service in July 1947 for either the World War II period or the post-World War II period but not for both. If your active service is before and on or after July 25, 1947, we add the $160 wage credit to the period which is most advantageous to you.
( c ) You do not get wage credits for the World War II period if another Federal benefit (other than one payable by the Veterans Administration) is determined by a Federal agency or an instrumentality owned entirely by the United States to be payable to you, even though the Federal benefit is not actually paid or is paid and then terminated, based in part on your active service during the World War II period except as explained in § 404.1343.
( d ) You do not get wage credits for the post-World War II period if another Federal benefit (other than one payable by the Veterans Administration) is determined by a Federal agency or an instrumentality owned entirely by the United States to be payable to you, even though the Federal benefit is not actually paid or is paid and then terminated, based in part on your active service during the post-World War II period except as explained in § 404.1343.
**EXHIBIT 23.1**

 

**CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLICACCOUNTING FIRM**

 

We herebyconsent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements onForm S-8 (No. 333-114534, No. 33-57308, No. 33-59697, No. 333-36497and No. 333-61816) of Ameron International Corporation of our report datedFebruary 9, 2005 relating to the financial statements, management’sassessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reportingand the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting, whichappears in the Annual Report to Stockholders, which is incorporated in thisAnnual Report on Form 10-K.  We also consent to the incorporation byreference of our report dated February 9, 2005 relating to the financialstatement schedule, which appears in this Form 10-K.

 
| /s/  PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP |   |
|---------------------------------|--------|
| Los Angeles,  California        |
| February 9,  2005          |

 

----
#### § 404.287 Waiver of recomputation.

If you or your family would be disadvantaged in some way by a recomputation of your primary insurance amount, or you and every member of your family do not want your primary insurance amount to be recomputed for any other reason, you may waive (that is, give up your right to) a recomputation, but you must do so in writing. That you waive one recomputation, however, does not mean that you also waive future recomputations for which you might be eligible.
# C_2012086EN.01002001.xml

| 23.3.2012 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 86/20 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

23.3.2012

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 86/20

---

Corrigendum to the authorisation for State aid pursuant to Articles 107 and 108 of the TFEU — Cases where the Commission raises no objections

(
  Official Journal of the European Union C 82 of 21 March 2012
  )

Official Journal of the European Union C 82 of 21 March 2012

2012/C 86/08

On page 1:

for:

‘Reference number of State Aid: SA.32075 (10/N)’,

read:

‘Reference number of State aid: SA.32076 (10/N)’.

---
**EXHIBIT 99.5**

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

 

18 U.S.C. §1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 

In connection with the annual report of Silver Wheaton Corp. (the “Company”) on Form 40-F for the period ended December 31, 2008 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Peter Barnes, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley            Act of 2002, that:

(1)       The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)       The information contained in this Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

| March 30, 2009 | By:    | /s / Peter Barnes                   |
|----------------|--------|-------------------------------------|
|           |   | Peter BarnesChief Executive Officer |

 

 

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Silver Wheaton Corp. and will be retained by Silver Wheaton Corp. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY HIGH

 439

 435

 457

 447

 442

 413

 415

 423

 408

 410

 456

 414

 342

 345

 397

 411

 429

 403

 477

 446

 424

 470

 468

 429

 437

 445

 410

 440

 423

 446

 507

 326

 321

 321

 307

 295

 284

 280

 274

 265

 262

 271

 270

 265

 262

 255

 250

 244

 239

 248

 251

 256

 268

 270

 270

 274

 284

 304

 283

 282

 293

 290

 355

 348

 365

 347

 339

 314

 311

 304

 297

 297

 311

 308

 287

 278

 283

 283

 287

 283

 306

 301

 308

 327

 329

 322

 323

 327

 327

 327

 334

 351

 354

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

JULY 2012 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: August 3, 2012

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

DELTA MENDOTA CANAL AT CHECK 13 (O'NEILL)
#### § 212.3 Crediting of military service.

In determining an individual's entitlement to an annuity and the amount of annuity to be paid under the Railroad Retirement Act, a calendar month or part of a calendar month during which the individual was in the active military service of the United States in a war service period, or period of national emergency, as determined in § 212.4 of this part, may be included in the individual's years of service. Military service is credited as though the individual had performed service for a railroad employer as provided for in part 210 of this chapter, provided that the individual is credited with railroad service in the year of or the year before entrance into active military service. Compensation for creditable military service shall be credited as provided for in § 211.7 of this chapter.
### §2152j. Statement of policy

It shall be the policy of the United States to promote the meaningful participation of women in all aspects of overseas conflict prevention, management, and resolution, and post-conflict relief and recovery efforts, reinforced through diplomatic efforts and programs that—

(1) integrate the perspectives and interests of affected women into conflict-prevention activities and strategies;

(2) encourage partner governments to adopt plans to improve the meaningful participation of women in peace and security processes and decision-making institutions;

(3) promote the physical safety, economic security, and dignity of women and girls;

(4) support the equal access of women to aid distribution mechanisms and services;

(5) collect and analyze gender data for the purpose of developing and enhancing early warning systems of conflict and violence;

(6) adjust policies and programs to improve outcomes in gender equality and the empowerment of women; and

(7) monitor, analyze, and evaluate the efforts related to each strategy submitted under section 2152j–1 of this title and the impact of such efforts.

(Pub. L. 115–68, §4, Oct. 6, 2017, 131 Stat. 1203.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section was enacted as part of the Women, Peace, and Security Act of 2017, and not as part of the Foreign Assistance Act of 1961 which comprises this chapter.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

DAY HIGH

 112

 112

 107

 123

 120

 100

 109

 109

 113

 121

 111

 113

 124

 113

 116

 120

 121

 117

 105

 105

 99

 112

 130

 118

 124

 132

 127

 116

 122

 108

 83

 86

 92

 100

 88

 88

 99

 98

 91

 97

 94

 90

 98

 99

 85

 93

 99

 90

 90

 92

 95

 90

 99

 108

 99

 106

 100

 101

 97

 95

 93

 93

 97

 103

 99

 92

 102

 101

 98

 103

 100

 95

 104

 103

 93

 101

 103

 98

 98

 98

 96

 97

 111

 109

 106

 111

 106

 109

 104

 103

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

SEPTEMBER 2002 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: October 9, 2002

HIGH LOW MEAN

 74.9

 75.6

 75.8

 73.6

 70.8

 69.9

 69.2

 69.5

 69.9

 71.3

 71.9

 72.0

 72.0

 71.7

 70.6

 71.0

 71.1

 71.3

 72.1

 78.3

 81.4

 81.1

 72.6

 72.2

 71.6

 71.3

 68.9

 66.9

 66.7

 66.5

 69.8

 70.3

 70.8

 70.6

 67.3

 65.6

 64.5

 64.4

 65.0

 66.1

 67.0

 67.3

 67.6

 67.3

 67.3

 66.7

 66.7

 67.0

 67.3

 68.3

 74.9

 68.5

 68.1

 67.5

 67.5

 66.9

 66.0

 64.9

 62.8

 63.1

 72.5

 73.2

 73.2

 72.1

 68.9

 67.7

 67.0

 67.0

 67.5

 68.7

 69.5

 69.6

 69.7

 69.4

 69.1

 68.8

 68.9

 69.2

 69.8

 71.5

 77.7

 74.5

 70.3

 69.9

 69.7

 69.1

 67.6

 65.9

 64.6

 64.8

HIGH LOW MEAN

 8.5

 8.2

 9.1

 8.7

 8.9

 9.1

 9.1

 9.2

 9.2

 9.0

 8.7

 8.7

 8.6

 8.8

 8.6

 8.4

 8.4

 8.3

 8.1

 8.1

 0.0

 9.0

 8.9

 8.8

 8.9

 8.9

 9.1

 9.3

 9.5

 9.5

 7.4

 7.3

 7.2

 7.2

 7.9

 8.3

 8.3

 8.3

 8.3

 8.1

 7.9

 7.9

 7.7

 7.7

 7.7

 7.7

 7.7

 7.7

 7.5

 7.3

 0.0

 8.4

 8.2

 8.1

 8.2

 8.2

 8.3

 8.5

 8.9

 8.8

 7.9

 7.7

 7.8

 8.1

 8.4

 8.6

 8.7

 8.7

 8.7

 8.5

 8.3

 8.2

 8.1

 8.1

 8.1

 8.0

 8.0

 7.9

 7.7

 7.6

 0.0

 8.7

 8.5

 8.4

 8.5

 8.5

 8.7

 8.9

 9.2

 9.1

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

RIPON ON THE STANISLAUS RIVER

 ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS WATER TEMPERATURE, DEG DISSOLVED OXYZEN, PPM
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 09-40804

Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee

v.

EMEDEN LOPEZ-SAENZ,

Defendant-Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Texas

USDC No. 7:09-CR-123-1

Before JOLLY, STEWART, and OWEN, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

*

The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Emeden Lopez-Saenz

has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders

v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Lopez-Saenz has not filed a response. Our

independent review of the record and counsel’s brief discloses no nonfrivolous

issue for appeal. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is

GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the

APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

F I L E D

June 22, 2010

Lyle W. Cayce

Clerk

Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not *

be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

Case: 09-40804 Document: 00511149647 Page: 1 Date Filed: 06/22/2010