alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### § 235.1 Basis and purpose.

Effective January 1, 1975, the Railroad Retirement Act of 1974 (Act) requires the Railroad Retirement Board (Board) to provide for the payment of monthly social security benefit payments on behalf of the Social Security Administration to certain individuals as described in § 235.3 of this part. However, any such individual who was receiving benefits from the Social Security Administration prior to January 1, 1975, will continue to receive benefits from that agency unless he or she becomes eligible for a different type of social security benefit after that date and files a new application with the Social Security Administration for that benefit. Benefits under the new entitlement will be paid by the Board. The Act provides an offset in the railroad retirement benefits of individuals who are also eligible for social security benefits. Because the Board is required to make this offset, the payment of social security benefits by the Board is authorized for the purpose of convenience in the administration of the Act.
§ 222.36 Relationship as grandchild or stepgrandchild. A claimant will have the relationship of grandchild or stepgrandchild of an employee, or the grandchild or stepgrandchild of an employee's spouse, and be considered a child for annuity purposes if the requirements in both paragraph (a) and either paragraph (b) or (c) of this section are met. ( a ) The claimant is the natural child, adopted child, or stepchild of a child of an employee, or of a child of the employee's spouse as defined in this subpart;
( b ) The claimant's natural or adoptive parents are deceased or are disabled, as defined in section 223(d) of the Social Security Act, in the month in which— ( 1 ) The employee, who is entitled to an age and service or disability annuity, under the Railroad Retirement Act, would also be entitled to an age benefit under section 202(a) of the Social Security Act or a disability benefit under section 223 of the Social Security Act, if his or her railroad compensation were considered wages under that Act; or
( 2 ) The employee dies; or
( 3 ) The employee's period of disability begins, if the employee has a period of disability which continues until he or she could be entitled to a social security benefit as described in paragraph (b)(1) of this section or until he or she dies.
( c ) The claimant was legally adopted in the United States by the employee's widow(er) after the employee's death, and the claimant's natural or adoptive parent or stepparent was not living in the employee's household and making regular contributions to the claimant's support at the time the employee died.
Note:
A grandchild or stepgrandchild does not have the relationship of “child” for lump-sum payment purposes (see § 222.44).
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

DAY ELEVATION

 252.59

 252.51

 252.65

 248.54

 244.56

 238.76

 238.75

 238.75

 238.60

 238.61

 238.62

 238.58

 238.67

 238.63

 238.54

 238.57

 238.59

 238.49

 238.53

 238.50

 238.50

 238.54

 238.51

 238.47

 238.43

 238.45

 238.46

 238.47

 238.46

 238.45

 3,968

 3,928

 3,998

 2,310

 1,250

 326

 325

 325

 309

 310

 311

 307

 316

 312

 303

 306

 308

 298

 302

 299

 299

 303

 300

 296

 292

 294

 295

 296

 295

 294

STORAGE

+15

-40

+70

-1,688

-1,060

-924

-1

+0

-16

+1

+1

-4

+9

-4

-9

+3

+2

-10

+4

-3

+0

+4

-3

-4

-4

+2

+1

+1

-1

-1

CHANGE

 340

 181

 283

 292

 259

 359

 339

 334

 333

 290

 223

 331

 268

 219

 240

 171

 157

 168

 177

 173

 140

 221

 180

 185

 162

 175

 235

 228

 207

 183

 7,674

 7,950

 7,950

 8,500

 8,000

 8,012

 8,015

 7,515

 7,515

 7,515

 7,395

 7,335

 7,525

 7,345

 6,925

 7,515

 7,205

 6,595

 7,040

 6,955

 7,145

 7,145

 7,065

 6,655

 6,730

 6,525

 6,440

 6,560

 6,510

 6,465

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

SEPTEMBER 2008 RED BLUFF DIVERSION RESERVOIR DAILY OPERATIONS RUN DATE: October 1, 2008

IN LAKE

CANAL

 ACRE-FEET

TOTALS -3,659 7,053 217,721

ACRE-FEET -3,659 13,990 431,850

SUMMARY

RELEASE (ACRE-FEET)

TOTAL 448,028

 3,953

RELEASE

RIVER

CORNING TO SACTO

CANAL

RELEASE C.F.S.

TEHAMA

COLUSA

 24

 36

 31

 62

 70

 86

 31

 28

 30

 46

 47

 25

 45

 31

 26

 44

 39

 34

 23

 38

 47

 15

 33

 31

 45

 39

 28

 32

 16

 21

 1,103

 2,188

CORNING CANAL 2,188

TEHAMA-COLUSA CANAL 13,990

TO SACTO RIVER 431,850
#### § 221.4 When a jurisdiction decision may be reversed.

The Board may reverse a jurisdiction decision whenever evidence is received by the Board indicating that the original decision was incorrect.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Commerce

###### National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration 

          - RIN 0648-XA379 

# AGENCY:

National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), Commerce. 

# ACTION:

Notice of a public meeting.

# SUMMARY:

                        The South Atlantic Fishery Management Council will hold a meeting of its Law Enforcement Advisory Panel via conference call. See                         **SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION**                        .                     

# DATES:

Members of the Law Enforcement Advisory Panel will meet via conference call from 2 p.m.-4 p.m. on May 10, 2011. 

# ADDRESSES:

A listening station will be established at the Council office, 4055 Faber Place Drive, Suite 201, N. Charleston, SC 29405. 

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

                        Kim Iverson, Public Information Officer, South Atlantic Fishery Management Council, 4055 Faber Place Drive, Suite 201, N. Charleston, SC 29405; telephone: (843) 571-4366 or toll free (866) SAFMC-10; fax: (843) 769-4520; e-mail:                         *kim.iverson@safmc.net.*

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

The LEAP will discuss nominations for selection of a Law Enforcement Officer of the Year Award and develop recommendations to the Council. 

## Special Accommodations 

                    The meeting is physically accessible to people with disabilities. Requests for auxiliary aids should be directed to the council office (see                     **ADDRESSES**                    ) 3 days prior to the conference call.                 

# Note:

 The specific end time for the conference call is subject to change.

Dated: April 14, 2011. 

William D. Chappell, 

Acting Director, Office of Sustainable Fisheries, National Marine Fisheries Service. 

[FR Doc. 2011-9529 Filed 4-19-11; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 3510-22-P
#### Samuel M. Melick v. Cyrus D. Kelley.

Filed January 19, 1898.

No. 7737.

Contracts. To establish an express contract there must be shown what amounts to a definite proposal and an unconditional and absolute acceptance thereof.

Error from the district court of Lancaster county. Tried below before Strode, J.

*Affirmed.*

*J. L. Caldwell,*for plaintiff in error.

*Webster, Rose & Fisherdiclc, contra.*

Irvine, C.

Kelley brought this action against Meliek to recover an unpaid portion of a promissory note executed bv dc*510fenclant to plaintiff. The defense was that the note was given as part consideration for the sale by plaintiff to defendant of certain real estate; that after it became due-a contract had been entered into whereby the note was to be surrendered upon the defendant’s executing to plaintiff a reconveyance of the real estate, and sending the deed to a bank in Cheyenne for delivery to plaintiff, upon plaintiff’á surrender to the bank of the note; that defendant had complied with his part of the contract, but plaintiff had refused to accept the deed or surrender the note. -The plaintiff had judgment and the defendant prosecutes this proceeding in error.

It would be useless to rehearse the evidence in detail. It wholly fails to disclose the consummation of any. contract between the parties, such as the defendant pleads. The negotiations were entirely by means of letter. Tin1 first letter, which apparently contained a proposition from Kelley to Melick, is not in evidence, nor is there any proof of its contents. Nowhere in the evidence does there appear any proof as to what lands were to be-reconveyed. If all which Kelley had conveyed to Melick were contemplated, it appears that the offer was not complied with, because, while the deed tendered covered all the property, it appears that two lots had by Melick been conveyed to a stranger, and the deed was to be delivered only on the erasure of the descriptions of those two lots. Furthermore, the deed -was sent with a demand that Kelley should agree to refund all taxes which Melick had paid. This coupled the acceptance of Kelley’s proposition with a condition, which for its enforcement required a counter-acceptance by Kelley which was not given. In any view, assuming for the proposal all that defendant claims, there was no absolute, unconditional acceptance' thereof, and the contract was not completed. To establish an express contract it is necessary to show a definite proposal and an unconditional and absolute acceptance thereof.

Affirmed.
###### Editorial Note on Part 44

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 44 appear by T.D. ATF-464, 66 FR 43480, Aug. 20, 2001, and T.D. ATF-480, 67 FR 30801-30803, May 8, 2002.

#### § 44.267 Return of cigars from other sources.

A customs warehouse proprietor may return to his warehouse cigars previously withdrawn therefrom, under this subpart, provided he promptly files with the appropriate TTB officer a copy of the Form 5200.14 under which the cigars were originally withdrawn, with the certificate of receipt properly modified and executed by the customs officer in charge of the warehouse to show return of the shipment. If less than the entire shipment is returned to the warehouse, the form shall state what disposition was made of the remainder of the original shipment and any other facts pertinent to such shipment. The customs warehouse proprietor shall retain a copy of such form as a part of his records for 3 years after the close of the calendar year in which the shipment was returned. Such copy shall be made available for inspection by any appropriate TTB officer upon request.

[25 FR 4725, May 28, 1960. Redesignated at 40 FR 16835, Apr. 15, 1975, as amended by T.D. ATF-421, 64 FR 71926, Dec. 22, 1999]
February 2024

STORAGE COMPUTED* RELEASE - C.F.S.

1000 ACRE-FEET INFLOW CANALS RIVER EVAPORATION PRECIP

DAY ELEV IN LAKE CHANGE C.F.S. MADERA FRIANT-KERN SPILL OUTLET C. F. S. INCHES INCHES

285.7

1 522.10 286.6 0.9 1,648 0 602 0 545 28 0.25 0.52

2 522.48 287.9 1.3 1,822 0 602 0 545 6 0.05 0.04

3 522.63 288.5 0.5 1,316 0 478 0 545 29 0.26 0.32

4 523.11 290.2 1.7 1,916 0 420 0 546 104 0.92 0.40

5 524.07 293.5 3.4 2,320 0 53 0 547 16 0.14 0.27

6 525.09 297.1 3.6 2,385 0 0 0 555 6 0.05 0.08

7 525.99 300.4 3.2 2,412 0 153 0 560 79 0.68 0.84

8 526.89 303.6 3.2 2,198 0 0 0 560 6 0.05 0.00

9 527.50 305.8 2.2 1,957 0 275 0 560 9 0.08 0.00

10 528.05 307.8 2.0 1,977 0 400 0 560 12 0.10 0.00

11 528.41 309.1 1.3 1,633 0 400 0 560 11 0.09 0.00

12 528.68 310.1 1.0 1,369 0 298 0 561 13 0.11 0.00

13 529.14 311.8 1.7 1,783 0 365 0 561 8 0.07 0.00

14 529.73 313.9 2.2 2,032 0 373 0 552 14 0.12 0.22

15 530.10 315.3 1.4 1,615 0 372 0 547 10 0.08 0.00

16 530.48 316.7 1.4 1,606 0 347 0 547 6 0.05 0.00

17 531.20 319.4 2.7 2,155 0 264 0 547 4 0.03 0.11

18 531.74 321.4 2.0 1,908 0 262 0 541 95 0.79 0.64

19 532.86 325.5 4.2 2,899 0 262 0 501 30 0.25 0.05

20 534.08 330.1 4.6 3,142 0 310 0 506 13 0.11 0.16

21 534.87 333.1 3.0 2,469 0 426 0 520 14 0.11 0.00

22 535.47 335.4 2.3 2,249 0 561 0 520 16 0.13 0.00

23 536.13 337.9 2.5 2,368 0 568 0 520 10 0.08 0.00

24 536.15 338.0 0.1 1,124 0 548 0 520 17 0.14 0.00

25 536.06 337.7 -0.3 971 0 606 0 520 19 0.15 0.00

26 536.24 338.4 0.7 1,657 0 776 0 521 12 0.10 0.02

27 536.43 339.1 0.7 1,826 0 904 0 537 17 0.14 0.00

28 536.85 340.7 1.6 2,329 0 955 0 545 15 0.12 0.00

29 537.18 342.0 1.3 2,103 0 897 0 545 20 0.16 0.05

TOTALS 56.4 57,189 0 12,477 0 15,694 639 5.41 3.72

ACRE-FEET 56,400 113,434 0 24,748 0 31,129 1,267

Comments: * COMPUTED INFLOW IS THE SUM OF CHANGE IN STORAGE, RELEASES, PUMPING AND EVAPORATION

Release (ACRE-FEET)

Friant-Kern Canal 24,748 River at Friant 31,129

Madera Canal 0 Total Releases 55,877

Precipitation

This month = 3.72

October 01, 2023 To date = 8.03

SUMMARY

Historical Archive and Report Database

Millerton Lake Daily Operations

Run Date: 3/10/2024
#### § 225.24 SS Earnings PIA used in survivor annuities.

The Social Security Earnings PIA (SS Earnings PIA) used in survivor annuities may be used in computing the tier II component when the survivor tier II is based on a percentage of the employee annuity tier II and the employee had been or would be, if he or she were still alive, entitled to a vested dual benefit. If the employee received a retirement annuity before death, this PIA is identical to the retirement SS Earnings Dual Benefit PIA described in subpart B of this part. If a retirement annuity was not paid before the employee's death, the PIA is determined as if the employee were 65 years old in the month of his or her death. The SS Earnings PIA used in survivor annuities is determined in accordance with section 215 of the Social Security Act as in effect on December 31, 1974. It is computed using the deceased employee's social security earnings after 1950 (or after 1936, if a higher PIA would result) through December 31, 1974.
§ 404.1298 Time for filing civil action—for wages paid prior to 1987. ( a ) *Time for filing.* The State must file the civil action for a redetermination of the correctness of the assessment, allowance or disallowance within 2 years from the date the Commissioner mails to the State the notice of the decision under § 404.1296. Where the 2-year period ends on a Saturday, Sunday, legal holiday or Federal nonwork day, an action filed on the next Federal workday is considered timely filed.
( b ) *Extension of time for filing.* The Commissioner, for good cause shown, may upon written application by a State filed prior to the end of the two-year period, extend the time for filing the civil action.
### §§1156 to 1160. Repealed. Pub. L. 96–465, title II, §2205(1), Oct. 17, 1980, 94 Stat. 2159

Section 1156, acts Aug. 13, 1946, ch. 957, title IX, §941, 60 Stat. 1029; July 28, 1956, ch. 770, §13, 70 Stat. 706, related to payment of expenses of medical treatment.

Section 1157, acts Aug. 13, 1946, ch. 957, title IX, §942, 60 Stat. 1029; July 28, 1956, ch. 770, §14, 70 Stat. 706; Sept. 4, 1961, Pub. L. 87–195, pt. IV, §708(5), 75 Stat. 464; Oct. 7, 1978, Pub. L. 95–426, title I, §113(a)(1), 92 Stat. 968, related to payment of expenses for travel for medical purposes.

Section 1158, acts Aug. 13, 1946, ch. 957, title IX, §943, 60 Stat. 1029; Apr. 5, 1955, ch. 23, §12, 69 Stat. 27; July 28, 1956, ch. 770, §15, 70 Stat. 707, related to physical examinations and inoculations.

Section 1159, act Aug. 13, 1946, ch. 957, title IX, §944, as added Dec. 23, 1967, Pub. L. 90–221, §2, 81 Stat. 671, related to authority to provide medical services beyond date of death or separation of officer or employee.

Section 1160, act Aug. 13, 1946, ch. 957, title IX, §945, as added Oct. 7, 1978, Pub. L. 95–426, title I, §113(a)(2), 92 Stat. 968, related to establishment and provision of medical treatment and health care facilities.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date of Repeal

Repeal effective Feb. 15, 1981, except as otherwise provided, see section 2403 of Pub. L. 96–465, set out as an Effective Date note under section 3901 of this title.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                             5
<LEGEND>

This schedule  contains summary  financial  information  extracted from NATIONAL
PROPERTY  INVESTORS 7 2000 First Quarter 10-QSB and is qualified in its entirety
by reference to such 10-QSB filing.

</LEGEND>

<CIK>                                 0000732439
<NAME>                                NATIONAL PROPERTY INVESTORS 7
<MULTIPLIER>                                              1,000


<S>                                     <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                         3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                     DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                        JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                          MAR-31-2000
<CASH>                                                    1,876
<SECURITIES>                                                  0
<RECEIVABLES>                                               124
<ALLOWANCES>                                                  0
<INVENTORY>                                                   0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                              0 <F1>
<PP&E>                                                   47,318
<DEPRECIATION>                                          (28,069)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                           22,224
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                         0 <F1>
<BONDS>                                                  21,010
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                         0
<PREFERRED>                                                   0
<COMMON>                                                      0
<OTHER-SE>                                                  646
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                             22,224
<SALES>                                                       0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                          1,824
<CGS>                                                         0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                                 0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                          1,805
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                              0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                          420
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                               0
<INCOME-TAX>                                                  0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                           0
<DISCONTINUED>                                                0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                               0
<CHANGES>                                                     0
<NET-INCOME>                                                 19
<EPS-BASIC>                                                0.31 <F2>
<EPS-DILUTED>                                                 0
<FN>

<F1> Registrant has an unclassified balance sheet. <F2> Multiplier is 1.

</FN>


</TABLE>
<PAGE>   1
 
                                                                      EXHIBIT 11
 
                            THE PIONEER GROUP, INC.
 
                 COMPUTATION OF EARNINGS PER SHARE (UNAUDITED)
                (DOLLARS IN THOUSANDS EXCEPT PER SHARE AMOUNTS)
 
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                                    THREE MONTHS
                                                                       ENDED
                                                                     MARCH 31,
COMPUTATION FOR                                               ------------------------
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF INCOME                                 1998          1997
--------------------------------                                 ----          ----
<S>                                                           <C>           <C>
Net Income(1)...............................................      $5,347        $7,309
                                                              ==========    ==========
Basic Earnings Per Share Calculation:
  Weighted average number of common shares outstanding......  24,890,000    24,703,000
                                                              ==========    ==========
Basic Earnings Per Share Calculation:.......................       $0.21         $0.30
                                                              ==========    ==========
Diluted Earnings Per Share Calculation:
  Weighted average number of common shares outstanding......  24,890,000    24,703,000
  Dilutive effect of stock options as common stock
  equivalents...............................................     745,000       685,000
  Dilutive effect of restricted stock proceeds as common
  stock equivalents.........................................     137,000        69,000
                                                              ----------    ----------
  Weighted average number of shares outstanding as
  adjusted..................................................  25,772,000    25,457,000
                                                              ==========    ==========
Diluted Earnings Per Share..................................       $0.21         $0.29
                                                              ==========    ==========
</TABLE>
 
---------------
(1) These amounts agree with the related amounts in the Consolidated Statement
    of Income.
#### Erick Ivan Duran CORTE, Petitioner, v. Alberto R. GONZALES, Attorney General, Respondent.

No. 05-74855.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted July 17, 2006.*

Decided July 21, 2006.

Gabriela Kreutzer, Esq., Los Angeles, CA, for Petitioner.

*562CAC — District Counsel, Esq., Office of The District Counsel, Department of Homeland Security, Los Angeles, CA, Ronald E. LeFevre, Chief Counsel, Office of The District Counsel, Department of Homeland Security, San Francisco, CA, OIL, DOJ — U.S. Department of Justice Civil Div./Office of Immigration Lit., Washington, DC, for Respondent.

Before: B. FLETCHER, HAWKINS and THOMAS, Circuit Judges.

*

This panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. *See*Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

MEMORANDUM **

Respondent’s motion for summary disposition is granted because the questions raised by this petition for review are so insubstantial as not to require further argument. *See United States v. Hooton,*693 F.2d 857, 858 (9th Cir.1982) (per curiam) (stating standard); *see also Falcon Carñche v. Ashcroft,*350 F.3d 845 (9th Cir. 2003); *Jimenez-Angeles v. Ashcroft,*291 F.3d 594, 602-03 (9th Cir.2002). Accordingly, this petition for review is denied.

All other pending motions are denied as moot.

PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED.

**

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.