# EUR-Lex - 52012PC0353 - EN

*|*

# 52012PC0353

**Proposal for a COUNCIL REGULATION amending Implementing Regulation (EU) No 723/2011 (extending the definitive anti-dumping duty imposed by Council Regulation (EC) No 91/2009 on imports of certain iron or steel fasteners originating in the People's Republic of China to imports of certain iron or steel fasteners consigned from Malaysia, whether declared as originating in Malaysia or not), by granting an exemption from those measures to one Malaysian exporting producer and terminating the registration of imports from that exporting producer /* COM/2012/0353 final - 2012/0170 (NLE) */**

			*

			*

EXPLANATORY MEMORANDUM

1.           CONTEXT OF THE PROPOSAL

|| · Grounds for and objectives of the proposal This proposal concerns the application of Council Regulations (EC) No 1225/2009 of 30 November 2009 on protection against dumped imports from countries not members of the European Community (‘the basic anti-dumping Regulation’) in the proceeding concerning the imposition of anti-dumping duties on imports of certain iron or steel fasteners originating in China, extended to imports of certain iron or steel fasteners consigned from Malaysia following a 'new exporter' review.

|| · General context This proposal is made in the context of the implementation of the basic Regulation and is the result of an investigation which was carried out in line with the substantive and procedural requirements laid out in the basic Regulation.

|| · Existing provisions in the area of the proposal Council Regulation (EC) No 91/2009 imposing definitive anti-dumping duties on imports of certain iron or steel fasteners originating in China, extended to imports of certain iron or steel fasteners consigned from Malaysia by Council Regulation (EU) No 723/2011.

|| · Consistency with other policies and objectives of the Union Not applicable.

2.           CONSULTATION OF INTERESTED PARTIES AND IMPACT ASSESSMENT

|| · Consultation of interested parties

|| Interested parties concerned by the proceeding have already had the possibility to defend their interests during the investigation, in line with the provisions of the basic anti-dumping Regulation.

|| · Collection and use of expertise

|| There was no need for external expertise.

|| · Impact assessment This proposal is the result of the implementation of the basic anti-dumping Regulation. The basic anti-dumping Regulation does not provide for a general impact assessment but contains an exhaustive list of conditions that have to be assessed.

3.           LEGAL ELEMENTS OF THE PROPOSAL

|| · Summary of the proposed action On 15 November 2011, the Commission, following a request of a Malaysian exporter, initiated a 'new exporter' review of Regulation (EU) No 723/2011 extending the definitive anti-dumping duty imposed by Council Regulation (EC) No 91/2009 on imports of certain iron or steel fasteners originating in the People's Republic of China to imports of certain iron or steel fasteners consigned from Malaysia, whether declared as originating in Malaysia or not. The attached proposal for a Council Regulation is based on the definitive findings which showed that the Malaysian exporter did not export certain iron or steel fasteners to the EU during the original investigation period (October 2009 to September 2010) and was producing certain iron or steel fasteners. No evidence of any circumvention activities was found. It is therefore proposed that the Council adopt the attached proposal for a Regulation in order to grant an exemption to the Malaysian exporter from the anti-dumping duty applicable to imports of certain iron or steel fasteners consigned from Malaysia.

|| · Legal basis Council Regulations (EC) No 1225/2009 of 30 November 2009 on protection against dumped imports from countries not members of the European Community.

|| · Subsidiarity principle The proposal falls under the exclusive competence of the Union. The subsidiarity principle therefore does not apply.

|| · Proportionality principle The proposal complies with the proportionality principle for the following reasons:

|| The form of action is described in the above-mentioned basic anti-dumping Regulation and leaves no scope for national decision.

|| Indication of how financial and administrative burden falling upon the Union, national governments, regional and local authorities, economic operators and citizens is minimized and proportionate to the objective of the proposal is not applicable.

|| · Choice of instruments

|| Proposed instrument: Regulation.

|| Other means would not be adequate for the following reason: Other means would not be adequate because the basic anti-dumping Regulation does not provide for alternative options.

4.           BUDGETARY IMPLICATION The proposal has no significant implication for the Union budget.

2012/0170 (NLE)

Proposal for a

COUNCIL REGULATION

amending Implementing Regulation (EU) No
723/2011 (extending the definitive anti-dumping duty imposed by Council
Regulation (EC) No 91/2009 on imports of certain iron or steel fasteners
originating in the People's Republic of China to imports of certain iron or
steel fasteners consigned from Malaysia, whether declared as originating in
Malaysia or not), by granting an exemption from those measures to one Malaysian
exporting producer and terminating the registration of imports from that
exporting producer

THE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION,

Having regard to the Treaty on the
Functioning of the European Union,

Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No
1225/2009 of 30 November 2009 on protection against dumped imports from
countries not members of the European Community[1]
('the basic Regulation') and in particular Articles 11(4) and 13(4) thereof,

Having regard to the proposal from the
European Commission ('the Commission') after consulting the Advisory Committee,

Whereas:

A. EXISTING MEASURES

(1)       The Council, by Regulation
(EC) No 91/2009[2]
imposed anti-dumping measures on certain iron or steel fasteners originating in
the People's Republic of China. By Regulation (EU) No 723/2011[3], the Council extended these
measures to certain iron or steel fasteners consigned from Malaysia (‘the
extended measures’) with the exception of imports produced by the Malaysian
companies which are specifically mentioned in that Regulation.

B. CURRENT INVESTIGATION

1. Request for a review

(2)       The Commission received a
request for an exemption from the extended measures pursuant to Articles 11(4)
and 13(4) of the basic Regulation. The application was lodged by Andfast
Malaysia Sdn. Bhd. (‘Andfast’), a producer in Malaysia.

2. Initiation of a review

(3)       The Commission examined
the evidence submitted by Andfast and considered it sufficient to justify the
initiation of an investigation pursuant to Articles 11(4) and 13(4) of the
basic Regulation for the purposes of determining the possibility of granting Andfast
an exemption from the extended measures. After consultation of the Advisory Committee,
and after the Union industry concerned had been given the opportunity to
comment, the Commission initiated, by Regulation (EU) No 1164/2011[4] ('the initiating Regulation'),
a review of Regulation (EU) No 723/2011 with regard to Andfast.

(4)       The Regulation initiating
the review repealed the anti-dumping duty imposed by Regulation (EU) No 723/2011
with regard to imports of the product under examination consigned from Malaysia
and produced by Andfast. Simultaneously, pursuant to Article 14(5) of the basic
Regulation, customs authorities were directed to take appropriate steps to
register such imports.

3. Product concerned

(5)       The product concerned is
certain iron or steel fasteners, other than of stainless steel, i.e. wood
screws (excluding coach screws), self-tapping screws, other screws and bolts
with heads (whether or not with their nuts or washers, but excluding screws turned
from bars, rods, profiles or wire, of solid section, of a shank thickness not
exceeding 6 mm and excluding screws and bolts for fixing railway track
construction material), and washers, consigned from Malaysia, currently falling
within CN codes ex 7318 12 90, ex 7318 14 91, ex 7318 14 99, ex 7318 15 59, ex
7318 15 69, ex 7318 15 81, ex 7318 15 89, ex 7318 15 90, ex 7318 21 00 and ex
7318 22 00 ('the product concerned').

4. Investigation

(6)       The Commission officially
advised Andfast and the representatives of Malaysia of the initiation of the
review. Interested parties were invited to make their views known and informed
of the possibility to request a hearing. No such request was received.

(7)       The Commission also sent a
questionnaire to Andfast and received a reply within the relevant deadline. The
Commission sought and verified all the information deemed necessary for the
purposes of the review. A verification visit was carried out at the premises of
Andfast.

5. Investigation period

(8)       The investigation covered
the period from 1 October 2010 to 30 September 2011 (‘the IP’). Data was
collected from 2008 up to the end of the IP to investigate any change in the
pattern of trade.

C. RESULTS OF THE INVESTIGATION

(9)       The
investigation confirmed that Andfast was not related to any of the Chinese or
Malaysian exporters or producers subject to the anti-dumping measures and had not
exported the product concerned to the European Union during the investigation
period of the investigation that led to the extended measures, i.e. 1 January
2008 to 30 September 2010. Andfast's first exports of the product concerned
occurred subsequently to the extension of measures to Malaysia.

(10)     The processing activities
of Andfast can be considered as a completion and assembly operation in the
sense of Article 13(2) of the basic Regulation. Andfast imports blanks from the
People's Republic of China which are subsequently threaded, plated and put
together with the nuts and the washers at its premises in Malaysia. The
finished product is sold and exported to its related company in the Union.

(11)     This is not considered to
be a process involving circumvention as it could be demonstrated that the value
added to the parts brought in from the People's Republic of China, during the
assembly and completion operation, is greater than 25% of the manufacturing
costs.

(12)     No evidence was found that Andfast
was purchasing the finished product concerned from the People's Republic of
China to resell or tranship to the European Union.

D. AMENDMENT OF THE MEASURES BEING
REVIEWED

(13)     In accordance with the
above findings that Andfast has not engaged in circumvention practices, the
company should be exempted from the anti-dumping measures in force.

(14)     The registration of imports
of certain iron or steel fasteners consigned from Malaysia by Andfast, as
imposed by the initiating Regulation, should cease. In accordance with Article
14(5) of the basic Regulation, which provides that measures shall be applied
against registered imports from the date of registration, and in view of the
exemption of the company from measures, no anti-dumping duty should be
collected on imports of certain iron or steel fasteners consigned from Malaysia
by Andfast which entered the Union under registration imposed by the initiating
Regulation.

(15)     The exemption from the
extended measures granted to imports of certain iron or steel fasteners
produced by Andfast shall, in accordance with Article 13(4) of the basic
Regulation, remain valid on condition that the facts as finally ascertained
justify the exemption and that it is not, for instance, established that the
exemption was granted on the basis of false or misleading information submitted
by the company concerned. Should prima facie evidence indicate otherwise,
or should exports from Andfast to the European Union increase dramatically, an
investigation may be initiated by the Commission to establish whether
withdrawal of the exemption is warranted.

(16)     The exemption from the
extended measures granted to imports of certain iron or steel fasteners produced
by Andfast was established on the basis of the findings of the present review.
This exemption is thus exclusively applicable to imports of certain iron or
steel fasteners consigned from Malaysia and produced by that specific legal
entity. Imported iron or steel fasteners, produced by any company not
specifically mentioned in Article 1(1) of Regulation (EU) No 723/2011 with its
name, including entities related to those specifically mentioned, shall not
benefit from the exemption and should be subject to the residual duty rate as
imposed by that Regulation.

(17)     It is considered that
special measures are needed in this case in order to ensure the proper
application of such exemptions. These special measures are the requirement of
the presentation to the customs authorities of the Member States of a valid
commercial invoice, which shall conform to the requirements set out in the
Annex to Regulation (EU) No 723/2011. Imports not accompanied by such an
invoice shall be made subject to the extended anti-dumping duty.

E. PROCEDURE

(18)     Andfast and all other
interested parties were informed of the facts and considerations on the basis
of which it was intended to grant an exemption to Andfast from the extended
measures. No comments were received,

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

Article 1

Article 1(1) of Regulation (EU) No 723/2011
shall be modified by adding the following company to the list of companies that
produce certain iron or steel fasteners in Malaysia and whose imports of certain
iron or steel fasteners are exempted from the application of the extended
definitive residual anti-dumping duty:

Andfast Malaysia Sdn. Bhd. (TARIC
additional code B265).

Article 2

The customs authorities are hereby directed
to cease the registration of imports carried out pursuant to Article 3 of Commission
Regulation (EU) No 1164/2011. No anti-dumping duty shall be collected on the
imports thus registered.

Article 3

This Regulation shall enter into force on
the day following that of its publication in the Official Journal of the
European Union.

This Regulation shall be binding
in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels,

For
the Council

The
President
                                                                       [...]

[1]               OJ L 343, 22.12.2009, p. 51.

[2]               OJ L 29, 31.1.2009, p. 1.

[3]               OJ L 194, 26.7.2011, p. 6.

[4]               OJ L 297, 16.11.2011, p. 53.