alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
### §7928. Privacy

The Secretary shall require an assurance that each grantee receiving funds under this chapter understands the importance of privacy protections for students and is aware of the responsibilities of the grantee under section 1232g of this title (commonly known as the "Family Education Rights and Privacy Act of 1974").

(Pub. L. 89–10, title VIII, §8548, as added Pub. L. 114–95, title VIII, §8040, Dec. 10, 2015, 129 Stat. 2121.)

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date

Section effective Dec. 10, 2015, except with respect to certain noncompetitive programs and competitive programs, see section 5 of Pub. L. 114–95, set out as an Effective Date of 2015 Amendment note under section 6301 of this title.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY HIGH

 425

 384

 399

 3,402

 3,886

 3,656

 1,198

 527

 407

 322

 274

 266

 271

 283

 261

 258

 268

 298

 324

 2,170

 2,695

 2,585

 2,028

 2,663

 2,102

 2,237

 1,765

 2,302

 2,654

 3,008

 3,298

 315

 297

 287

 294

 337

 376

 337

 305

 281

 247

 234

 233

 230

 231

 234

 238

 245

 249

 257

 273

 341

 503

 522

 530

 556

 514

 506

 546

 541

 594

 587

 362

 337

 322

 922

 1,359

 945

 590

 378

 325

 274

 252

 245

 244

 244

 246

 249

 254

 263

 272

 563

 943

 1,180

 1,039

 1,121

 1,041

 953

 937

 1,021

 1,179

 1,123

 1,314

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

MARCH 2001 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: April 9, 2001

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

PITTSBURG TOP ON THE SACRAMENTO RIVER
A-AA+Skip to content

                  - Home
                  - Compendium Statistics
                  - Event
                  - Archives
                  - Glossary
                  - Help
                  - Contact
                  - Research on Disability

Annual Disability Statistics Compendium

              - Home /
              - Compendium Statistics /
              - Social Security Administration Programs /
              - 9.8a Supplemental Security Income—Change in the Number of Recipients of Federally Administered Payments, Total and Aged Eligible

## Table 9.8a: Supplemental Security Income—Change in the Number of Recipients of Federally Administered Payments, Total and Age Eligible: 2010 to 2011

----

----

 

----

#### 2012 Disability Compendium

                        - Home
                        - Compendium Statistics                           - Population and Prevelance
                          - Employment
                          - Time Trend Population Statistics
                          - Poverty
                          - Earnings
                          - Veterans
                          - Health Insurance Coverage
                          - Health
                          - Social Security Administration Programs
                          - Medicaid and Medicare
                          - Special Education
                          - Vocational Rehabilitation
                          - Federal Government Spending and Employment
                          - International Disability Statistics
                          - Population Statistics: Disability Type
                        - Event
                        - Archives                           - 2012 Compendium Statistics
                        - Glossary
                        - Help
                        - Contact
                        - Research on Disability

#### Funding for this project is made possible by:

 The Research and Training Center on Disability Statistics and Demographics (StatsRRTC), which is funded by the U.S. Department of Education, National Institute for Disability and Rehabilitation Research, under cooperative agreements H133B080012.

#### Stay Connected

**Institute on Disability**10 West Edge Drive, Suite 101Durham, NH 03824603.862.4320 | relay: 711 | [email protected]www.iod.unh.edu

© 2013. Institute on Disability.University of New Hampshire.
§ 255.16 Administrative relief from recovery. ( a ) Where the Board seeks to recover an overpayment from someone other than the overpaid individual, as provided for in § 255.4 of this part, and where waiver of recovery, as provided for in § 255.10 of this part, is not available because the overpaid individual was at fault as defined in § 255.11 of this part, the Board may forego recovery of the overpayment where the individual from whom recovery is sought was not at fault in causing the overpayment and where recovery is contrary to the purpose of the Railroad Retirement Act as defined in § 255.12 of this part.
( b ) Application of administrative relief from recovery with respect to a given person from whom recovery may be made shall have no effect on the authority of the Board to recover the overpayment from anyone else from whom recovery may be sought.
( c ) This section may be illustrated by the following examples:
Example (1): An employee, through his own fault, causes an overpayment in his annuity. The employee dies before the overpayment can be recovered from him and he leaves no estate. A widow's annuity is payable on the employee's compensation record. The widow was not at fault in causing the overpayment. The Board may recover the remainder of the overpayment by setoff against the widow's annuity. However, it may forego recovery under this section if such recovery would be contrary to the purpose of the Railroad Retirement Act as defined in § 255.12 of this part. Since this is not a waiver of the overpayment, the Board is free to recover the overpayment from the widow at a later date, for example, if an accrual of benefits should become payable, or if it determines that such recovery would not be against the purpose of the Railroad Retirement Act.
Example (2): A representative payee for a retarded child, through her own fault, causes an overpayment in the child's annuity. The overpaid amounts were used for the benefit of the child. The representative payee dies before the overpayment can be recovered from her and she leaves no estate. The Board may not waive the remainder of the overpayment with respect to the child since for purposes of waiver the representative payee is considered the overpaid individual (see § 255.17 of this part) and the overpaid individual was at fault. However, if the child was not at fault in causing the overpayment and recovery would be contrary to the purpose of the Railroad Retirement Act as defined in § 255.12 of this part, then the Board may forego recovery of the overpayment from the child's annuity under this section.
```

[House Report 112-415]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]

112th Congress                                                   Report
                        HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES
 2d Session                                                     112-415

======================================================================

 
     PROVIDING FOR CONSIDERATION OF THE BILL (H.R. 2087) TO REMOVE 
 RESTRICTIONS FROM A PARCEL OF LAND SITUATED IN THE ATLANTIC DISTRICT, 
                       ACCOMACK COUNTY, VIRGINIA

                                _______
                                

   March 19, 2012.--Referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be 
                                printed

                                _______
                                

           Mr. Bishop of Utah, from the Committee on Rules, 
                        submitted the following

                              R E P O R T

                       [To accompany H. Res. 587]

    The Committee on Rules, having had under consideration 
House Resolution 587, by a nonrecord vote, report the same to 
the House with the recommendation that the resolution be 
adopted.

                SUMMARY OF PROVISIONS OF THE RESOLUTION

    The resolution provides for consideration of H.R. 2087, to 
remove restrictions from a parcel of land situated in the 
Atlantic District, Accomack County, Virginia, under a modified 
open rule. The resolution provides one hour of general debate 
equally divided and controlled by the chair and ranking 
minority member of the Committee on Natural Resources. The 
resolution waives all points of order against consideration of 
the bill. The resolution makes in order the amendment in the 
nature of a substitute recommended by the Committee on Natural 
Resources now printed in the bill 
as original text for purpose of amendment and provides that it 
shall be considered as read. The resolution waives all points 
of order against the amendment in the nature of a substitute. 
The resolution makes in order only those amendments that are 
submitted for printing in the Congressional Record dated March 
19, 2012, or pro forma amendments for the purpose of debate. 
Each amendment submitted for printing in the Congressional 
Record may be offered only by the member who submitted it for 
printing or the Member's designee and shall be considered as 
read if printed. Finally, the resolution provides one motion to 
recommit with or without instructions.

                         EXPLANATION OF WAIVERS

    Although the resolution waives all points of order against 
consideration of the bill, the Committee is not aware of any 
points of order. The waiver is prophylactic in nature.
    Although the resolution waives all points of order against 
the committee amendment in the nature of a substitute made in 
order as original text, the Committee is not aware of any 
points of order. The waiver is prophylactic in nature.

                                  

```
[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 76 (Wednesday, April 20, 2011)]
[Notices]
[Page 22168]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2011-9587]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY

Internal Revenue Service


Open Meeting of the Area 2 Taxpayer Advocacy Panel (Including the 
States of Delaware, North Carolina, South Carolina, Maryland, 
Pennsylvania, Virginia, West Virginia and the District of Columbia)

AGENCY: Internal Revenue Service (IRS), Treasury.

ACTION: Notice of meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: An open meeting of the Area 2 Taxpayer Advocacy Panel will be 
conducted. The Taxpayer Advocacy Panel is soliciting public comments, 
ideas, and suggestions on improving customer service at the Internal 
Revenue Service.

DATES: The meeting will be held Wednesday, June 15, 2011.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Audrey Y. Jenkins at 1-888-912-1227 or 
718-488-2085.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Notice is hereby given pursuant to section 
10(a)(2) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, 5 U.S.C. App. (1988) 
that an open meeting of the Area 2 Taxpayer Advocacy Panel will be held 
Wednesday, June 15, 2011, at 2:30 p.m. Eastern Time via telephone 
conference. The public is invited to make oral comments or submit 
written statements for consideration. Due to limited conference lines, 
notification of intent to participate must be made with Audrey Jenkins. 
For more information please contact Ms. Jenkins at 1-888-912-1227 or 
718-488-2085, or write TAP Office, 10 MetroTech Center, 625 Fulton 
Street, Brooklyn, NY 11201, or post comments to the Web site: http://www.improveirs.org.
    The agenda will include various IRS issues.

    Dated: April 15, 2011.
Shawn Collins,
Director, Taxpayer Advocacy Panel.
[FR Doc. 2011-9587 Filed 4-19-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4830-01-P
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

DAY HIGH

 27,418

 27,592

 26,595

 26,305

 26,073

 26,535

 27,904

 29,444

 26,195

 23,002

 21,416

 19,705

 18,651

 17,923

 18,644

 16,926

 15,822

 15,589

 17,269

 17,705

 19,814

 23,364

 23,968

 23,849

 23,935

 24,241

 24,182

 23,998

 18,935

 18,496

 18,510

 18,806

 17,978

 16,845

 17,340

 17,735

 15,866

 12,494

 10,495

 8,400

 7,886

 7,471

 7,272

 7,919

 7,786

 7,970

 8,287

 8,216

 8,784

 8,913

 9,559

 9,856

 10,514

 10,940

 11,700

 13,230

 23,488

 23,360

 22,735

 22,006

 21,345

 21,136

 22,325

 23,552

 21,693

 18,839

 16,448

 14,824

 13,414

 12,673

 12,895

 12,453

 11,988

 11,693

 12,199

 11,973

 13,214

 15,202

 15,768

 16,631

 17,242

 17,324

 18,149

 18,002

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

FEBRUARY 2014 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: June 6, 2014

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

PORT CHICAGO BOTTOM IN SUISUN BAY
### §692. Inspection extended to reindeer

The provisions of the meat-inspection law may be extended to the inspection of reindeer.

(June 30, 1914, ch. 131, 38 Stat. 420.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section was enacted as part of the appropriation act cited as the credit to this section and not as part of the Federal Meat Inspection Act which is classified to subchapters I to IV–A of this chapter.

Section was formerly classified to section 94 of this title.
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. John Capotosto, Appellant.

Judgment unanimously affirmed. No opinion. Present — Peek, P. J., Dore, Cohn, Callahan and Shientag, JJ.
Exhibit 3.3

CERTIFICATE OF AMENDMENT

OF

AMENDED AND RESTATED CERTIFICATE OF INCORPORATION

OF

COMMUNITY BANKERS TRUST CORPORATION

Pursuant to Section 242

of the General Corporation Law of the State of Delaware

Community Bankers Trust Corporation, a corporation duly organized and existing under the General Corporation Law of the State of Delaware
(the Corporation), does hereby certify that:

1. The Amended and Restated Certificate of
Incorporation of the Corporation is hereby amended by deleting Article Fourth thereof and inserting the following in lieu thereof:

FOURTH. The total number of shares of all classes capital stock which the Corporation shall have authority to issue is two hundred five
million (205,000,000) shares, consisting of two hundred million (200,000,000) shares of common stock, par value $0.01 per share (Common Stock), and five million (5,000,000) shares of preferred stock, par value $0.01 per
share (Preferred Stock).

2. The foregoing amendment was duly adopted in accordance with the
provisions of Section 242 of the General Corporation Law of the State of Delaware.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, Community Bankers
Trust Corporation has caused this Certificate to be executed by its duly authorized officer on this 17th day of July, 2009.



COMMUNITY BANKERS TRUST CORPORATIONBy:

/s/ John M. Oakey, IIIName:

John M. Oakey, IIIOffice:

Secretary
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Margarito CONTRERAS-ALVARADO, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 05-51194

Conference Calendar.

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.

July 13, 2006.

Joseph H. Gay, Jr, Assistant U.S. Attorney, U.S. Attorney’s Office Western District of Texas, San Antonio, TX, for Plaintiff-Appellee.

Judy Fulmer Madewell, Federal Public Defender’s Office Western District of Texas, San Antonio, TX, for Defendant-Appellant.

Before DAVIS, BARKSDALE, and DeMOSS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: *

Appealing the Judgment in a Criminal Case, Margarito Contreras-Alvarado raises arguments that are foreclosed by *Almendarez-Torres v. United States,*523 U.S. 224, 235, 118 S.Ct. 1219, 140 L.Ed.2d 350 (1998), which held that 8 U.S.C. § 1326(b)(2) is a penalty provision and not a separate criminal offense. The Government’s motion for summary affirmance is GRANTED, and the judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.

*

 Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.
#### Rose M. Bourdillon, Respondent, v. Helena Rubinstein, Inc., Appellant.

Ho opinion. The date for the examination to proceed to be fixed in the order. Settle order on notice. Present — Martin, P. J., Townley, Dore, Cohn and Callahan, JJ.
Exhibit 32.1

Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350

In connection with the Annual Report of The
Parent Company (the Company) on Form 10-K for the year ended February 2, 2008 as filed with the SEC on or about the date hereof (the Report), I, Michael J. Wagner, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

A signed original of this written statement has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the SEC or its staff
upon request.



/s/ MICHAEL J. WAGNERMichael J. WagnerChief Executive Officer (Principal Executive Officer)


Date: April 30, 2008
~

StandardAero

u.s. Department of Transportation

Docket Operations

West Building, Room W12-140

1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE

Washington, D.C. 20590-0001

January 9,2014

Re: Request Extension for Exemption No. 10845 to 14 CFR §25.571(e)(1)

Project ST08333CH-T, Installation of the Aircell Broadband Services (ABS) System with Ku

Enhancements on Airbus A330 Series Aircraft

In accordance with 14 CFR Part 11, StandardAero, petitioned for an exemption from 14 CFR § 25.571 (e)(1)

(Amendment 25-96) as it relates to the above referenced certification project. StandardAero requests an

extension to the previously granted exemption from this rule and that it remain valid for a period of one year

from the date of STC issuance.

This request is identical to our original Petition for Exemption which was granted. However, when the

exemption was issued, the exemption was issued for one year from the date of issuance which has not

allowed StandardAero with sufficient time to fully complete all required substantiation activity.

Safety and Public Interest

The previous considerations and determination regarding safety and public interest have not changed

between the original petition and this extension request.

In light of the above considerations StandardAero submits that good cause exists not to delay action on this

request.

Summary of Exemption Request

In accordance with 14 CFR § 11.81 (f), StandardAero offers the following summary suitable for publication in

the Federal Register in the event the FAA believes that good cause to waive publication has not been

established.

StandardAero, requests the FAA grant an extension to the current exemption from the discrete source

damage tolerance (i.e., bird strike) requirements of 14 CFR § 25.571(e)(1) for a period of one year based on

data that such a bird strike encounter is less than extremely improbable.

Please feel free to contact me if you need further information.

Respectfully,

,/: I \ - n nC

\~VJ~~

Tim Winiesdorffer

ODA administrator

StandardAero

1200 North Airport Drive

Springfield, IL 62707

United States

Mobile: 614.402.4455

Tim.Winiesdorffer@standardaero.com

www.standardaero.com
### §§134 to 135b. Repealed. Pub. L. 107–171, title X, §10418(a)(17), (18), May 13, 2002, 116 Stat. 508

Section 134, Pub. L. 87–518, §1, July 2, 1962, 76 Stat. 129, related to definitions for Pub. L. 87–518.

Section 134a, Pub. L. 87–518, §2, July 2, 1962, 76 Stat. 129, related to seizure, quarantine, and disposal of livestock or poultry to guard against introduction or dissemination of communicable disease.

Section 134b, Pub. L. 87–518, §3, July 2, 1962, 76 Stat. 130, related to regulations for clean and sanitary movement of animals.

Section 134c, Pub. L. 87–518, §4, July 2, 1962, 76 Stat. 130, related to regulations for movement of animals affected or exposed to communicable disease.

Section 134d, Pub. L. 87–518, §5, July 2, 1962, 76 Stat. 130, related to inspections, seizures, and issuance of warrants.

Section 134e, Pub. L. 87–518, §6, July 2, 1962, 76 Stat. 131; Pub. L. 97–461, §8, Jan. 12, 1983, 96 Stat. 2525, related to enforcement provisions.

Section 134f, Pub. L. 87–518, §11, July 2, 1962, 76 Stat. 132, related to promulgation of regulations.

Section 134g, Pub. L. 87–518, §12, July 2, 1962, 76 Stat. 132, related to authority in addition to other laws and repeal of inconsistent provisions.

Section 134h, Pub. L. 87–518, §13, July 2, 1962, 76 Stat. 132, related to separability.

Section 135, Pub. L. 91–239, §1, May 6, 1970, 84 Stat. 202; Pub. L. 103–465, title IV, §431(j), Dec. 8, 1994, 108 Stat. 4969, related to the establishment of international animal quarantine station, acceptance of gifts, cooperation with breeders' organizations, and collection of fees.

Section 135a, Pub. L. 91–239, §2, May 6, 1970, 84 Stat. 202; Pub. L. 97–461, §9, Jan. 12, 1983, 96 Stat. 2525, related to smuggling penalties.

Section 135b, Pub. L. 91–239, §3, May 6, 1970, 84 Stat. 202, related to authorization of appropriations.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                                      5
<MULTIPLIER>                           1,000,000


<S>                            <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                  12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>              DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                   SEP-30-1999
<CASH>                                       878
<SECURITIES>                                 262
<RECEIVABLES>                              5,087
<ALLOWANCES>                                 293
<INVENTORY>                                  468
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                           6,941
<PP&E>                                    60,525
<DEPRECIATION>                            36,005
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                            41,919
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                     13,614
<BONDS>                                    8,786
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                   2,020
<OTHER-SE>                                11,660
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>              41,919
<SALES>                                      478
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                          18,543
<CGS>                                        601
<TOTAL-COSTS>                              9,170
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                           4,409
<LOSS-PROVISION>                             260
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           737
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            4,217
<INCOME-TAX>                               1,607
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        2,610
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                               2,610
<EPS-BASIC>                               1.37
<EPS-DILUTED>                               1.36




</TABLE>