alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### Bobby F. McREYNOLDS, Appellant, v. Randy JOHNSON, Sheriff, Pulaski County; Randy Morgan, Jail Administrator, Pulaski County Jail; Maximum Health Care Service; Carl Johnson, Dr., Pulaski County Jail; Sarah Speer, Nurse, Pulaski County Jail, originally sued as Carol Spheres; Pulaski County Jail; Glenda Moore, Sgt., originally sued as Moore; James Bozeman, Officer, originally sued as Bozeman; Derek Grist, Officer, originally sued as Grist; Jane Does, 3 Nurses employed by Maximum Health Care, Appellees. Bobby F. McReynolds, Appellant, v. Randy Johnson, Sheriff, Pulaski County Jail; Randy Morgan, Jail Administrator, Pulaski County Jail, Appellees.

No. 05-2635.

United States Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit.

Submitted: July 20, 2006.

Filed: Aug. 3, 2006.

Bobby F. McReynolds, Malvern, AR, pro se.

David Mack Fuqua, Hope & Fuqua, Anthony Wayne Juneau, Mitchell *&*Williams, Little Rock, AR, for Appellees.

Before BYE, MAGILL, and BENTON, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

Arkansas prisoner Bobby McReynolds appeals the district court’s 1 order dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action after a pretrial evidentiary hearing. McReynolds claimed that defendants showed deliberate indifference to his medical needs by neglecting to schedule and take him to a post-hernia-surgery follow-up appointment, and by placing him on a top bunk after his surgery contrary to medical orders for a lower bunk assignment. In dismissing McReynolds’s complaint, the court relied in part on the absence of harm caused by the missed appointment, and on McReynolds’s failure to show that any defendant was personally responsible for any unconstitutional action. Following careful review, *see Johnson v. Bi-State Justice Ctr.,*12 F.3d 133, 135-36 (8th Cir.1993) (standard of review), we affirm. *See*8th Cir. R. 47B.

1

. The Honorable H. David Young, United States Magistrate Judge for the Eastern District of Arkansas, to whom the case was referred for final disposition by consent of the parties pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(c).
§ 403.145 What will SSA do if you have not satisfied the conditions in this part or in 20 CFR part 401 or 402? ( a ) We will provide the following information, as appropriate, to you or the court or other tribunal conducting the legal proceeding if your request states that a response is due on a particular date and the conditions prescribed in this part, or the conditions for disclosure in 20 CFR part 401 or 402, are not satisfied or we anticipate that they will not be satisfied by that date: ( 1 ) A statement that compliance with the request is not authorized under 20 CFR part 401 or 402, or is prohibited without the Commissioner's approval;
( 2 ) The requirements for obtaining the approval of the Commissioner for testimony or for obtaining information, records, or testimony under 20 CFR part 401 or 402; and
( 3 ) If the request complies with § 403.120, the estimated time necessary for a decision. We will make every reasonable effort to provide this information in writing on or before the date specified in your request.
( b ) Generally, if a response to a request for information, records, or testimony is due before the conditions of this part or the conditions for disclosure in 20 CFR part 401 or 402 are met, no SSA employee will appear.
( c ) SSA will seek the advice and assistance of the Department of Justice when appropriate.
### IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 18

- 10144 Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA , Plaintiff

- Appellee

v. DAVID NINO

- FLORES , Defendant

- Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas USDC No. 3:17

- CR

- 409

- 1

Before KING, SOUTHWICK , and ENGELHARDT, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: * David Nino

- Flores appeals the 27

- month , within

- guidelines prison term imposed following his guilty plea conviction for ill egal ly re - ent ering the United States after removal

. Raising one issue , Nino

- Flores argues that his indictment did not allege a conviction occurring bef ore his removal and that, for this
reason, his prison term , imposed under 8 U.S.C. § 1326(b) , was in excess of the statutory maximum permitted under § 1326(a) and violated his due process

* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5 , the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit 

### FILED August 21, 2018

Lyle W. Cayce Clerk Case: 18-10144 Document: 00514609036 Page: 1 Date Filed: 08/21/2018No. 18

- 10144

2 rights. The Government has filed an unopposed motion for summary affirmance and , alternatively, seeks an extension of time to file its brief. As the Government argues and as Nino

- Flores concedes, the only issue raised on appeal is foreclosed by Almendarez

- Torres v. United States , 523 U.S. 224 (1998). See Unite d States v. Wallace , 759 F.3d 486, 497 (5th Cir. 2014); United States v. Pineda

- Arrellano , 492 F.3d 624, 625

- 26 (5th Cir. 2007). Because the issue is foreclosed, summary affirmance is appropriate. See Groendyke Transp., Inc. v. Davis , 406 F.2d 1158, 1162 (5th Cir. 1969). Accordingly, the Government’s motion for summary affirmance is GRANTED, and the judgment is AFFIRMED. The Government’s alternative motion for an extension of time to file its brief is DENIED. Case: 18-10144 Document: 00514609036 Page: 2 Date Filed: 08/21/2018
Exhibit 32.2

Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350

In connection with the Annual Report of The
Parent Company (the Company) on Form 10-K for the year ended February 2, 2008 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the SEC) on or about the date hereof (the Report), I, Barry Hollingsworth,
Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
operations of the Company.

A signed original of this written statement has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the
Company and furnished to the SEC or its staff upon request.



/s/ BARRY HOLLINGSWORTHBarry HollingsworthVice President and Chief Financial Officer (Principal Financial Officer)


Date: April 30, 2008
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

DAY HIGH

 17,191

 17,495

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 17,531

 17,210

 16,921

 17,700

 19,127

 20,789

 20,540

 21,860

 22,894

 23,838

 23,600

 23,367

 23,861

 22,901

 21,704

 20,597

 19,590

 20,490

 20,486

 20,680

 6,474

 5,971

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 5,124

 5,599

 5,988

 6,555

 7,380

 7,110

 6,524

 7,817

 8,976

 8,514

 7,629

 7,294

 7,661

 7,688

 7,210

 7,397

 7,685

 7,608

 8,081

 8,361

 11,123

 11,058

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 11,934

 11,934

 11,182

 11,421

 12,010

 12,543

 13,239

 14,749

 15,764

 15,465

 15,472

 15,816

 15,753

 15,290

 15,568

 14,772

 13,707

 14,336

 13,438

 13,326

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

JUNE 2020 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: July 9, 2020

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

PORT CHICAGO BOTTOM IN SUISUN BAY
### §1440. Repealed. Pub. L. 105–277, div. G, subdiv. A, title XIII, §1336(1), Oct. 21, 1998, 112 Stat. 2681–790

Section, acts Jan. 27, 1948, ch. 36, title X, §1009, 62 Stat. 14; Pub. L. 87–256, §111(a)(2), Sept. 21, 1961, 75 Stat. 538, related to applicability of chapter provisions to similar international activities of State Department.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date of Repeal

Repeal effective Oct. 1, 1999, see section 1301 of Pub. L. 105–277, set out as an Effective Date note under section 6531 of this title.
§ 404.2041 Who is liable if your representative payee misuses your benefits? ( a ) A representative payee who misuses your benefits is responsible for paying back misused benefits. We will make every reasonable effort to obtain restitution of misused benefits so that we can repay these benefits to you.
( b ) Whether or not we have obtained restitution from the misuser, we will repay benefits in cases when we determine that a representative payee misused benefits and the representative payee is an organization or an individual payee serving 15 or more beneficiaries. When we make restitution, we will pay you or your alternative representative payee an amount equal to the misused benefits less any amount we collected from the misuser and repaid to you.
( c ) Whether or not we have obtained restitution from the misuser, we will repay benefits in cases when we determine that an individual representative payee serving 14 or fewer beneficiaries misused benefits and our negligent failure in the investigation or monitoring of that representative payee results in the misuse. When we make restitution, we will pay you or your alternative representative payee an amount equal to the misused benefits less any amount we collected from the misuser and repaid to you.
( d ) The term “negligent failure” used in this subpart means that we failed to investigate or monitor a representative payee or that we did investigate or monitor a representative payee but did not follow established procedures in our investigation or monitoring. Examples of our negligent failure include, but are not limited to, the following: ( 1 ) We did not follow our established procedures in this subpart when investigating, appointing, or monitoring a representative payee;
( 2 ) We did not timely investigate a reported allegation of misuse; or
( 3 ) We did not take the necessary steps to prevent the issuance of payments to the representative payee after it was determined that the payee misused benefits.
( e ) Our repayment of misused benefits under these provisions does not alter the representative payee's liability and responsibility as described in paragraph (a) of this section.
( f ) Any amounts that the representative payee misuses and does not refund will be treated as an overpayment to that representative payee. See subpart F of this part.
[69 FR 60234, Oct. 7, 2004, as amended at 71 FR 61408, Oct. 18, 2006]
(May 25, 1943.)

#### Barbara M. Kullman, Respondent, v. Violet Wyrtzen et al., Respondents, and Miriam Pforr, Defendant-Appellant.

*803Hagarty, Johnston, Adel, Taylor and Lewis, JJ., concur.
I 

114TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 3804 

To amend the Congressional Budget Act of 1974 to provide that any estimate 

prepared by the Congressional Budget Office or the Joint Committee 

on Taxation shall include costs relating to servicing the public debt, 

and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

OCTOBER 22, 2015 

Mr. BRAT introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee 

on Rules, and in addition to the Committee on the Budget, for a period 

to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee 

concerned 

A BILL 

To amend the Congressional Budget Act of 1974 to provide 

that any estimate prepared by the Congressional Budget 

Office or the Joint Committee on Taxation shall include 

costs relating to servicing the public debt, and for other 

purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Cost Estimates Reform 

5 Act of 2015’’. 


SSpencer on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 3804 IH

1 SEC. 2. CBO AND JCT ESTIMATES TO INCLUDE DEBT SERV2 ICING COSTS. 

3 (a) IN GENERAL.—The Congressional Budget and 

4 Impoundment Control Act of 1974 (2 U.S.C. 621 et seq.) 

5 is amended by inserting after section 402 the following: 

6 ‘‘ESTIMATES TO INCLUDE DEBT SERVICING COSTS

7 ‘‘SEC. 403. Any estimate prepared by the Congres8 sional Budget Office under section 402, and any estimate 

9 prepared by the Joint Committee on Taxation, shall in10 clude, to the extent practicable, the costs (if any) of serv11 icing the public debt.’’. 

12 (b) CLERICAL AMENDMENT.—The table of contents 

13 of such Act is amended by inserting after the item relating 

14 to section 402 the following: 

‘‘403. Estimates to include debt servicing costs.’’. 

Æ 


SSpencer on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
### §77a. Functions of museum

The national air and space museum shall memorialize the national development of aviation and space flight; collect, preserve, and display aeronautical and space flight equipment of historical interest and significance; serve as a repository for scientific equipment and data pertaining to the development of aviation and space flight; and provide educational material for the historical study of aviation and space flight.

(Aug. 12, 1946, ch. 955, §2, 60 Stat. 998; Pub. L. 89–509, pt. I, §4, July 19, 1966, 80 Stat. 310.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

1966—Pub. L. 89–509 substituted "national air and space museum" for "national air museum", inserted "and space flight" after "aviation" wherever appearing, and substituted "aeronautical and space flight equipment" for "aeronautical equipment".
#### § 10.706 How will a beneficiary know if OWCP or SOL has determined that action against a third party is required?

When OWCP determines that an employee or other FECA beneficiary must take action against a third party, it will notify the employee or beneficiary in writing. If the case is transferred to SOL, a second notification may be issued.
### Part D—Leaves of Absence
Exhibit 21.1

SUBSIDIARIES OF CENTENNIAL BANK HOLDINGS, INC.



|                                                              |  |                                 
|------------------------------------------------------------- |  | --------------------------------
|Name of Subsidiary                                            |  | State of Incorporation/Formation
|Centennial Bank of the West                                   |  | Colorado                        
|Collegiate Peaks Bank                                         |  | Colorado                        
|Guaranty Bank and Trust Company                               |  | Colorado                        
|Guaranty Capital Trust III                                    |  | Delaware                        
|CenBank Statutory Trust I                                     |  | Connecticut                     
|CenBank Statutory Trust II                                    |  | Connecticut                     
|CenBank Statutory Trust III                                   |  | Delaware                        
|FMS Holding, Inc. (formerly First MainStreet Insurance, Ltd.) |  | Colorado
#### § 225.35 When a PIA used in computing a retirement annuity can be increased for DRC's.

Delayed retirement credits earned at different times are added to the PIA used in computing a retirement annuity as follows:

| DRC's earned for month in | Are added to PIA |
| --- | --- |
| Years before the year the employee annuity begins | On the date the annuity begins. |
| Year the annuity begins | On January 1 of the year after the annuity begins. |
| Years after the annuity begins, and before the year the employee attains age 70 (72 before 1984) | On January 1 of the year after the credits are earned. |
| Year the employee attains age 70 (72 before 1984) | In the month age 70 (or 72) is attained. |
EXHIBIT 32.1

Certification pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350. as Adopted Pursuant to Section 906

of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

Each of the undersigned officers of Transcontinental Realty Investors, Inc., a Nevada corporation (the
Company) hereby certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 that:



| | (i) | The Companys Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the three months ended March 31, 2007, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and
| | --- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (ii) | The information contained in the Companys Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the three months ended March 31, 2007, fairly presents in all material respects, the financial
condition and results of operations of the Company, at and for the periods indicated.
| | ---- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                   |  |  |  |                                                                    
|------------------ |  |  |  | -------------------------------------------------------------------
|Date: May 15, 2008 |  |  |  | /s/ Daniel J. Moos                                                 
|                   |  |  |  | Daniel J. Moos                                                     
|                   |  |  |  | President and Chief Operating Officer (Principal
Executive Officer)
|                   |  | 
|Date: May 15, 2008 |  |  |  | /s/ Gene S. Bertcher                                               
|                   |  |  |  | Gene S. Bertcher                                                   
|                   |  |  |  | Executive Vice President and Interim Chief Financial Officer
### **CHAPTER 3—UNITED STATES COURT FOR CHINA**
Exhibit 32

      Statement Required by 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
                  Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002


      This certificate is being delivered pursuant to the requirements of
      Section 1350 of Chapter 63 (Mail Fraud) of Title 18 (Crimes and Criminal
      Procedures) of the United States Code and shall not be relied on by any
      other person for any other purpose.

      In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of BellSouth
      Corporation (the "Company") for the quarter ended March 31, 2005, as filed
      with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
      "Report"), the undersigned, F. Duane Ackerman, Chairman of the Board,
      Chief Executive Officer and President of the Company, and Ronald M. Dykes,
      Chief Financial Officer, of the Company, certify that

        o      the Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a)
               or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

        o      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
               material respects, the financial condition and results of
               operations of the Company.


/s/ F. Duane Ackerman
---------------------
F. Duane Ackerman

May 2, 2005


/s/ Ronald M. Dykes
---------------------
Ronald M. Dykes

May 2, 2005







A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to BellSouth Corporation and will be retained by BellSouth Corporation
and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
request.
Exhibit 31.1

CERTIFICATION

I, Michael Eyre, the Chief Executive Officer of CellCyte Genetics Corporation, certify that:

(1)         I have reviewed this Report on Form 10-KSB for the year ended December 31, 2006 of CellCyte Genetics Corporation;

(2)         Based on my knowledge, this Report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this Report;

(3)         Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this Report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

(4)         The registrant's other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

(a)         designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

(b)         evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this Report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and 

(c)         disclosed in this Report any change in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting; and

(5)         The registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of the internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

(a)         all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and 

(b)         any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting.  

Date:       March 26, 2007.