Draft Environmental Impact Statement for the Rosemont Copper Project 776

Chapter 6. Literature Cited

AMEC Earth and Environmental Inc. 2009a. Rosemont Copper Company Dry Stack Tailings Storage 

Facility Final Design Report. Project No. 84201191. Prepared for Rosemont Copper 

Company. Englewood, Colorado: AMEC Earth and Environmental, Inc. April 15.

———. 2009b. Technical Memorandum: Dry Stack Facility Stability Analysis. Project No. 

9420119100. Prepared for Rosemont Copper Company. Englewood, Colorado: AMEC Earth 

and Environmental Inc. December 15.

American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials. 2004. A Policy on Geometric 

Design of Highways and Streets. 5th ed. Washington D.C.: American Association of State 

Highway and Transportation Officials.

———. 2006. Roadside Design Guide. 3rd ed. Washington, D.C.: American Association of State 

Highway and Transportation Officials.

American Society for Testing and Materials. 2006. Standard guide for application of a ground-water 

flow model to a site-specific problem. Standard D 5447-04. In ASTM Standards Related to 

Environmental Site Characterization, pp. 491–497. 3rd ed. Stock No. ENVSITO6. West 

Conshohocken, Pennsylvania: ASTM International. September.

Applied Economics. 2011. Economic Impacts of the Rosemont Copper Project on Pima County, 

Arizona. Phoenix, Arizona: Applied Economics. June.

Applied Environmental Consultants. 2009a. CALPUFF Modeling Protocol for Rosemont Copper 

Project to Assess Impacts on Class I Areas. Prepared on behalf of Rosemont Copper 

Company. Submitted to Pima County Department of Environmental Quality. Tempe, 

Arizona: Applied Environmental Consultants. October 30.

———. 2009b. Modeling Protocol to Assess Ambient Air Quality Impacts from the Rosemont Copper 

Project. Prepared on behalf of Rosemont Copper Company. Submitted to Pima County 

Department of Environmental Quality. Tempe, Arizona: Applied Environmental Consultants. 

October 30.

———. 2010a. Appendix G: Dust Control Plan. In Rosemont Copper Company Application for a 

Class II Permit, Rosemont Copper Project, Southeastern Arizona. Submitted to Pima County 

Department of Environmental Quality. Submitted by Rosemont Copper Company. Tempe, 

Arizona: Applied Environmental Consultants. July 28.

———. 2010b. Rosemont Copper Company Application for a Class II Permit, Rosemont Copper 

Project, Southeastern Arizona. Submitted to Pima County Department of Environmental 

Quality. Submitted by Rosemont Copper Company. Tempe, Arizona: Applied Environmental 

Consultants. July 28.

———. 2010c. Rosemont Copper Company CALPUFF Modeling Report to Assess Impacts in Class I 

Areas. Prepared for SWCA Environmental Consultants. Tempe, Arizona: Applied 

Environmental Consultants. July 28.

———. 2010d. Rosemont Copper Company Executive Summary: Air Quality Information, Rosemont 

Copper Project, Southeastern Arizona. Prepared for SWCA Environmental Consultants. 

Tempe, Arizona: Applied Environmental Consultants. July 28.
Chapter 6. Literature Cited

Draft Environmental Impact Statement for the Rosemont Copper Project 777

———. 2011a. Addendum to Emission Inventory Information Years 1, 5, 10, 15, 20, Rosemont 

Copper Project, Southeastern Arizona. Prepared for SWCA Environmental Consultants. 

Tempe, Arizona: Applied Environmental Consultants. April 1.

———. 2011b. Rosemont Copper Company Revised AERMOD Modeling Report to Assess Ambient 

Air Quality Impacts. Prepared for SWCA Environmental Consultants. Tempe, Arizona: 

Applied Environmental Consultants. April 4.

———. 2011c. Rosemont Copper Company Revised CALPUFF Modeling Report to Assess Impacts 

in Class I Areas. Prepared for SWCA Environmental Consultants. Tempe, Arizona: Applied 

Environmental Consultants. April 4.

———. 2011d. Rosemont Copper Company VISCREEN: Visibility Impacts Analysis at Saguaro East 

National Park. Prepared for SWCA Environmental Consultants. Tempe, Arizona: Applied 

Environmental Consultants. April 1.

Arizona Capital Times and Arizona Tax Research Association. 2010. An Explanation of Arizona 

Property Taxes. 2010 ed. Phoenix, Arizona.

Arizona Daily Star. 2010. Star 200: The Top 200 employers of southern Arizona. Available at: 

http://dynamic.azstarnet.com/star200/. Accessed September 3, 2010.

Arizona Department of Agriculture. 2005. Protected Arizona native plants list. Available at: 

http://www.azda.gov/ESD/nativeplants.htm. Accessed July 22, 2010.

Arizona Department of Commerce. 2006. 2006–2055 commerce population projections. Available at: 

http://www.azcommerce.com/econinfo/demographics/Population. Accessed September 2, 

2010.

———. 2009a. Profile: Cochise County, Arizona. Phoenix, Arizona. December.

———. 2009b. Profile: Pima County, Arizona. Phoenix, Arizona. December.

———. 2009c. Profile: Santa Cruz County, Arizona. Phoenix, Arizona. December.

Arizona Department of Environmental Quality. 2004. Arizona Mining Guidance Manual BADCT.

Aquifer Protection Program. Publication # TB-04-01. Phoenix, Arizona: Arizona Department 

of Environmental Quality.

———. 2008. 2008 Air Quality Annual Report (A.R.S. 49-424.10). Phoenix, Arizona: Air Quality 

Assessment Section, Arizona Department of Environmental Quality.

———. 2009. Title 18, Environmental Quality; Chapter 11, Department of Environmental Quality 

Water Quality Standards; Article 1, Water Quality Standards for Surface Waters. Available 

at: http://www.azdeq.gov/environ/water/standards/download/SWQ_Standards-1-09-

unofficial.pdf. Accessed July 9, 2010.

———. 2010. LUST database search results. Available at: 

http://www.azdeq.gov/databases/lustsearch.html. Accessed November 3, 2010.
Chapter 6. Literature Cited

778 Draft Environmental Impact Statement for the Rosemont Copper Project

Arizona Department of Revenue. 2007. FY 2007 Annual Report. Phoenix, Arizona. November 15.

———. 2008. FY 2008 Annual Report. Phoenix, Arizona. November 14.

Arizona Department of Transportation. 1999. Traffic Impact Analysis for Proposed Development. 

Publication No. 35-209. Intermodal Division, Traffic Engineering Group, Arizona 

Department of Transportation. April.

———. 2005. Noise Abatement Policy. Phoenix: Arizona Department of Transportation

Environmental and Enhancement Group. November 29.

———. 2007. Roadway Design Guidelines. Roadway Engineering Group, Arizona Department of 

Transportation. January.

———. 2011a. Arizona State Highway System 20-year daily traffic forecasts. Available at: 

http://www.azdot.gov/mpd/data/Reports/PDF/SHS2028AADTForecastsver2.pdf. Accessed 

May 24, 2011.

———. 2011b. Average annual daily traffic Available at: http://www.azdot.gov/mpd/data/aadt.asp. 

Accessed May 24, 2011.

———. 2011c. Fuel Tax Rates in Arizona. Available at: 

http://www.azdot.gov/mvd/fueltaxevasion/azfueltaxrates.asp. Accessed September 15, 2011.

———. 2011d. Transportation Data Management System. Available at: 

http://adot.ms2soft.com/tcds/tsearch.asp?loc=Adot&mod=. Accessed May 22, 2011.

Arizona Department of Water Resources. 2005. Statement of Claimant Adjudications Database CD.

———. 2010. Land subsidence in the Sahuarita and Green Valley areas, Pima County. Time period 

of analysis: 0.9 Year, 02/27/2009 to 2001/2008/2010. Arizona Department of Water 

Resources.

———. 2011a. Surface water conditions in the Cienega Creek Basin. Available at: 

http://www.azwater.gov/AzDWR/StatewidePlanning/WaterAtlas/SEArizona/Streams/Cieneg

aCreek.htm. Accessed May 24, 2011.

———. 2011b. Surface Water Filings Database Available at: http://www.azwater.gov/azdwr/GIS/. 

Accessed September 7, 2011.

———. 2011c. Well registry data for Cienega Basin. Available at: 

https://gisweb.azwater.gov/waterresourcedata/WellRegistry.aspx. Accessed May 22, 2011.

Arizona Game and Fish Department. 1996. In prep. Wildlife of Special Concern in Arizona. Phoenix, 

Arizona: Arizona Game and Fish Department. March 16.

———. 2000a. Carex ultra L.H. Bailey. Unpublished abstract compiled and edited by the Heritage 

Data Management System.

———. 2000b. Muhlenbergia dubioides C. Gooding. Unpublished abstract compiled and edited by 

the Heritage Data Management System.
Chapter 6. Literature Cited

Draft Environmental Impact Statement for the Rosemont Copper Project 779

———. 2001a. Aspidoscelis burti stictogrammus. Unpublished abstract compiled and edited by the 

Heritage Data Management System.

———. 2001b. Coryphantha scheeri var. robustispina. Unpublished abstract compiled and edited by 

the Heritage Data Management System.

———. 2001c. Erigeron arisolius Nesom. Unpublished abstract compiled and edited by the Heritage 

Data Management System.

———. 2001d. Graptopetalum bartramii Rose. Unpublished abstract compiled and edited by the 

Heritage Data Management System.

———. 2001e. Poeciliopsis occidentalis occidentalis. Unpublished abstract compiled and edited by 

the Heritage Data Management System.

———. 2002. Coccyzus americanus occidentalis. Unpublished abstract compiled and edited by the 

Heritage Data Management System.

———. 2003a. Amoreuxia gonzalezii. Unpublished abstract compiled and edited by the Heritage 

Data Management System.

———. 2003b. Leptonycteris curasoae yerbabuenae. Unpublished abstract compiled and edited by 

the Heritage Data Management System.

———. 2003c. Lilaeopsis schaffneriana (Schlecht) var. recurva (A.W. Hill) Affolter. Unpublished 

abstract compiled and edited by the Heritage Data Management System.

———. 2003d. Pectis imberbis Gray. Unpublished abstract compiled and edited by the Heritage Data 

Management System.

———. 2004a. Hexalectris revoluta Correll. Unpublished abstract compiled and edited by the 

Heritage Data Management System.

———. 2004b. Tragia laciniata. Unpublished abstract compiled and edited by the Heritage Data 

Management System.

———. 2006a. Agosia chrysogaster Girard. Unpublished abstract compiled and edited by the 

Heritage Data Management System.

———. 2006b. Rana chiricahuensis. Unpublished abstract compiled and edited by the Heritage Data 

Management System.

———. 2008a. Sonorella magdalenensis (Stearns, 1890). Unpublished abstract compiled and edited 

by the Heritage Data Management System.

———. 2008b. Sonorella rosemontensis Pilsbry, 1939. Unpublished abstract compiled and edited by 

the Heritage Data Management System.

———. 2009. The Story of Macho B. Available at: http://www.azgfd.gov/w_c/jaguar/machob.shtml. 

Accessed July 26, 2011.
Chapter 6. Literature Cited

780 Draft Environmental Impact Statement for the Rosemont Copper Project

———. 2010. Leopardus pardalis. Unpublished abstract compiled and edited by the Heritage Data 

Management System.

———. 2011a. 2011–2012 hunting and trapping regulations. Available at: 

http://www.azgfd.gov/h_f/hunting_rules.shtml. Accessed May 24, 2011.

———. 2011b. Game and Fish gets another photo of rare ocelot. Available at: 

http://azgfd.net/artman/publish/NewsMedia/Game-and-Fish-gets-another-photo-of-rareocelot.shtml. Accessed July 14, 2011.

———. 2011c. Rare Ocelot observed in southern Arizona, February 8, 2011. Available at: 

http://azgfd.net/artman/publish/NewsMedia/Rare-ocelot-observed-in-southern-Arizona.shtml. 

Accessed March 25, 2011.

———. 2011d. Special Status Species within the Rosemont Mine Study Area. AGFD # M11-

08150947. Heritage Data Management System. Tucson, Arizona: Arizona Game and Fish 

Department. August 15.

Arizona Geological Society. 2007. Spring 2007 Field Trip Guidebook. Rosemont Mine Tour: 

Arizona Geological Society. April 28.

Arizona Hospitality Research and Resource Center School of Management. 2005. A Summary of BBB 

Tax Rates in Arizona Cities and Towns. Prepared for the Arizona Office of Tourism. 

Flagstaff, Arizona: Northern Arizona University. November.

Arizona National Forests Socioeconomic Assessment Team. 2005. Socio-Economic Assessment for 

the Coronado National Forest. Prepared for the U.S. Forest Service, Southwestern Region. 

Tucson, Arizona: School of Natural Resources, University of Arizona.

Arizona Rare Plant Committee. n.d. (2000). Arizona Rare Plant Field Guide. Arizona Rare Plant 

Committee.

Arizona Scenic Roads. 2009. Patagonia-Sonoita Scenic Road. Available at: 

http://www.arizonascenicroads.com/contentScenicRoadDetail.aspx?ScenicRoadId=21. 

Accessed September 2, 2010.

Arizona State Parks. 1995. Arizona Trail Management Guide. Prepared for Arizona Trail Partners 

and the Arizona Trail Association. Phoenix, Arizona: Arizona State Parks. October 20.

———. 2003. Economic Importance of Off-Highway Vehicle Recreation to Arizona. Phoenix: 

Arizona State Parks, Recreational Trails.

———. 2007. 2008 Arizona Statewide Comprehensive Outdoor Recreation Plan. Phoenix, Arizona: 

Planning Unit, Resources Management Section, Arizona State Parks. September.

———. 2009. Arizona Trails 2010: A Statewide Motorized and Non-motorized Recreational Trails 

Plan. Phoenix, Arizona: Planning and Recreational Trails Unit, Arizona State Parks. July.

———. 2010. Motorized Trails Program grants: C. Available at: 

http://www.pr.state.az.us/grants/library_MOTORIZED/motorized_c.html. Accessed 

September 2, 2010.
Chapter 6. Literature Cited

Draft Environmental Impact Statement for the Rosemont Copper Project 781

Arizona Trail Association. 2009. The Arizona Trail. Available at: http://www.aztrail.org/. Accessed 

September 2, 2010.

———. n.d. (2011). Arizona Trail Association Strategic Plan 2011-2016. Available at: 

http://www.aztrail.org/StrategicPlan.pdf.

Arizona Wildlife Linkages Workgroup. 2006. Arizona's Wildlife Linkages Assessment. Arizona 

Wildlife Linkages Workgroup.

Arizona Workforce Informer. 2011. Unemployment rates and labor force statistics. Available at: 

http://www.workforce.az.gov/cgi/dataanalysis/labForceReport.asp?menuchoice=LABFORC

E. Accessed March 4, 2011.

Armstrong, R. L., and P. Ward. 1991. Evolving geographic patterns of cenozoic magmatism in the 

North American cordillera: the temporal and spatial association of magmatism and 

metamorphic core complexes. Journal of Geophysical Research 96(B8):13.201–224.

Arnold, K., and R. Henderson. 2007. Hazardous and Industrial Materials and Quantities, Issue 

Number: FDD-4, Item Number: 25. Document No. 205/07-114-320776-5.3. Tucson, 

Arizona: Tetra Tech. November 28.

Arnold, K., and T. Meyer. 2006. Rosemont Tailings Siting Study. Project 06.50.0300. Tucson: Vector 

Arizona. May 26.

Averill-Murray, R. C., and C. M. Klug. 2000. Monitoring and Ecology of Sonoran Desert Tortoises 

in Arizona. Technical Report No. 161. Phoenix, Arizona: Arizona Game and Fish 

Department, Nongame and Endangered Wildlife Program. November 17.

Ayres, J. E. 1984. Rosemont: The History and Archaeology of Post-1880 Sites in the Rosemont Area, 

Santa Rita Mountains, Arizona. Archaeological Series No. 147, Vol. 3. Tucson, Arizona: 

Cultural Resource Management Division, Arizona State Museum, University of Arizona.

Baker Jr., M. B., P. F. Ffolliott, L. R. DeBano, and D. G. Neary (eds.). 2004. Riparian Areas of the 

Southwestern United States: Hydrology, Ecology, and Management. Washington, D.C.: 

Lewis Publishers.

Baker, M. A. 2003. Sensitive Plant Survey for the Coronado National Forest, Final Report. Project 

No. 2003-01-FLORA. Chino Valley, Arizona: U.S. Forest Service. December 14.

Baker, S. G. 1980. An Evaluation of Historic Sites in the Rosemont Archaeological Project Area, 

Pima County, Arizona. Montrose, Colorado: Centuries Research, Inc.

Barr, D. M., I. S. Hesse, S. J. Hesse, J. E. Hider, S. Griset, E. S. P. II, and D. B. Tucker. 2010. 

Archaeological Survey of Alternatives to the Proposed Rosemont Copper Mine, Pima 

County, Arizona. Cultural Resources Report No. 10-334. Prepared for the Coronado National 

Forest. Prepared on behalf of Rosemont Copper Company. Tucson, Arizona: SWCA 

Environmental Consultants. August.

Barter, H., and M. Odom. 2011. Additional Discussion of Rosemont Mine Water Supply Modeling 

and Analysis of Calibration. Project No. 1232.05. Tucson, Arizona: Montgomery and 

Associates. January 6.
Chapter 6. Literature Cited

782 Draft Environmental Impact Statement for the Rosemont Copper Project

Barter, H. W., and J. D. Whittier. 2011. Second Response to April 5, 2011, Selected Comments 

Provided by U.S. Forest Service Regarding Groundwater Flow Modeling Conducted for the 

Rosemont Project. Tucson, Arizona: Montgomery and Associates. May 17.

Biedenbender, S. 2010a. Greaterville Allotment Rangeland Monitoring Analysis. Memorandum File 

Code No. 2210. Nogales, Arizona: Coronado National Forest, U.S. Forest Service. January 4.

———. 2010b. Rosemont Allotment Rangeland Monitoring Analysis. Memorandum File Code No. 

2210. Nogales, Arizona: Coronado National Forest, U.S. Forest Service. January 11.

Boydston, E. E., and C. A. López-González. 2005. Sexual differentiation in the distribution potential 

of northern jaguars (Panthera onca). In Connecting Mountain Islands and Desert Seas: 

Biodiversity and Management of the Madrean Archipelago II, edited by G.J. Gottfried, B.S. 

Gebow, L.G. Eskew, and C.B. Edminster, pp. 51–56. RMRS-P-36. Fort Collins, Colorado: 

Rocky Mountain Research Station, U.S. Forest Service. September.

Brennan, T. C., and A. T. Holycross. 2009. A Field Guide to Amphibians and Reptiles in Arizona.

Phoenix: Arizona Game and Fish Department. May.

Brown, D. E. (ed.). 1994. Biotic Communities: Southwestern United States and Northwestern Mexico.

Salt Lake City: University of Utah Press.

Brown, D. E., and C. López González. 2001. Borderland Jaguars; Tigres de la Frontera. Logan, 

Utah: University of Utah Press.

Brown, J. K., and J. K. Smith (eds.). 2000. Wildland Fire in Ecosystems: Effects of Fire on Flora.

General Technical Report RMRS-GTR-42-volume 2. Ogden, Utah: U.S. Forest Service, 

Rocky Mountain Research Station. December.

Brown, K. 2009. Range Specialist, Coronado National Forest. Verbal communication with Geoff 

Soroka, SWCA Environmental Consultants. January 29.

Buecher, D. C., R. Sidner, T. Strong, and A. L. Best. 2010. Rosemont Holdings 2009 Bat Roost 

Survey. Project No. 1049.14 CCO2 350B. Tucson, Arizona: WestLand Resources Inc. 

January 14.

Bureau of Economic Analysis. 2011. Local area personal income. Available at: 

http://www.bea.gov/regional/reis/default.cfm#step3. Accessed May 26, 2011.

Bureau of Land Management. 1986. Visual Resource Contrast Rating. BLM Manual Handbook 

8431-1. Bureau of Land Management. January 17.

———. 1988. Proposed Phoenix Resource Management Plan and Final Environmental Impact 

Statement. Phoenix, Arizona. December.

———. 2003. Approved Las Cienegas Resource Management Plan and Record of Decision. 

BLM/AZ/PL-03/010. Tucson, Arizona: Arizona State Office, Bureau of Land Management. 

July 25.
Chapter 6. Literature Cited

Draft Environmental Impact Statement for the Rosemont Copper Project 783

———. 2007a. Migratory Bird Treaty Act: Interim management guidance. Available at: 

http://www.blm.gov/wo/st/en/info/regulations/Instruction_Memos_and_Bulletins/national_in

struction/20080/im_2008-050__migratory.html. Accessed March 29, 2011.

———. 2007b. Potential Fossil Yield Classification (PFYC) System for Paleontological Resources 

on Public Lands. Instruction Memorandum No. 2008-009. Washington, D.C.: Department of 

the Interior. October 15.

———. 2008a. Manual 6840 - Special Status Species Management. Washington, D.C.: Department 

of the Interior, Bureau of Land Management. December 12.

———. 2008b. National Environmental Policy Act. Handbook H-1790-1. Washington D.C.: Bureau 

of Land Management. January.

———. 2009. Chapters 1 through 4 and 11. In Departmental Manual Part 516: National 

Environmental Policy Act of 1969. Office of Environmental Policy and Compliance. 

September 1.

———. 2011. Arizona National Scenic Trail. Available at: 

http://www.blm.gov/az/st/en/prog/blm_special_areas/az-scenic-trail. Accessed August 20, 

2011.

Carrasco, J. 2009. Rosemont Copper Project Design Storm and Precipitation Data/Design Criteria. 

Document No. 057/09-320807-5.3. Prepared for Rosemont Copper Company. Tucson, 

Arizona: Tetra Tech. April 7.

Carruth, R. L., D. R. Pool, and C. E. Anderson. 2007. Land Subsidence and Aquifer-System 

Compaction in the Tucson Active Management Area, South-Central Arizona 1987-2005. 

Scientific Investigations Report 2007-5190. Reston, Virginia: U.S Geological Survey.

Catling, P. M. 2004. A synopsis of the genus Hexalectris in the United States and a new variety of 

Hexalectris revoluta. The Native Orchid Conference Journal 1(2):5–25.

Chee, R. 2010. Expanded Barrel Only Alternative Stormwater Assessment. Document No. 0/

10-320878-5.3. Prepared for Rosemont Copper Company. Tucson, Arizona: Tetra Tech. 

September 15.

Cinzano, P. 2000. Disentangling artificial sky brightness from single sources in diffusely urbanized 

areas. Journal of the Italian Astronomical Society 71(1, Special Issue: Measuring and 

Modelling Light Pollution):113–130.

Coleman, R. A. 2002. The Wild Orchids of Arizona and New Mexico. Ithaca, New York: Cornell 

University Press.

Congressional Sportsmen Foundation. n.d. (2008). Hunting and Fishing: Bright Stars of the 

American Economy—A Force as Big as all Outdoors. Washington, D.C.: Congressional 

Sportsmen Foundation.

Cooperative Extension Service, U.S. Forest Service, Grazing Land Technology Institute, and Bureau 

of Land Management. 1999. Sampling Vegetation Attributes. Rev. ed. Technical Reference 

No. 1734-4. Denver, Colorado: Bureau of Land Management.
Chapter 6. Literature Cited

784 Draft Environmental Impact Statement for the Rosemont Copper Project

Corman, T. 2009. Lower Cienega Creek. Written communication to K. Kertell, SWCA 

Environmental Consultants. June 15. 

Corman, T. E., and C. Wise-Gervais (eds.). 2005. Arizona Breeding Bird Atlas. Albuquerque: 

University of New Mexico Press.

Cornoyer, J. 2011. Memorandum to File: Caves Have Not Been Encountered in the Rosemont 

Deposit. Tucson, Arizona: Rosemont Copper Company. April 28.

Council on Environmental Quality. 1997. Environmental Justice: Guidance Under the National 

Environmental Policy Act. Washington, D.C.: Council of Environmental Quality. December 

10.

———. 2007. A Citizen's Guide to the NEPA: Having Your Voice Heard. Executive Office of the 

President. December.

———. 2011. Appropriate Use of Mitigation and Monitoring and Clarifying the Appropriate Use of 

Mitigated Findings of No Significant Impact. Prepared by N.H. Sutley. Washington, D.C.: 

Executive Office of the President, Council on Environmental Quality. January 14.

Crowson, P. 2009. The Resource Curse: A Modern Myth? In Mining, Society and a Sustainable 

World, edited by J.P. Richards. New York, New York: Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg.

Curiel Jr., E. (ed.). 2006. Santa Rita Mountains Ecosystem Management Area, Transportation

Analysis Plan. Rev. U.S. Forest Service, Coronado National Forest. October.

Dark Sky Partners LLC. 2011. An Assessment of the Impact of Potential Mining Operation at the 

Rosemont Copper Mine on the Night Sky of Southern Arizona. Prepared for SWCA 

Environmental Consultants. Tucson, Arizona: Dark Sky Partners LLC. January.

Davis, R. P., and J. R. Callahan (eds.). n.d. (1977). An Environmental Inventory of the Rosemont Area 

in Southern Arizona, Volume I: The Present Environment. Tucson, Arizona: University of 

Arizona.

Day, S., and C. Hoag. 2011. Technical Review of Infiltration, Seepage, Fate and Transport Modeling 

Report—Revision 1, Part 2: Geochemical Fate and Transport Modeling. Project No. 183101. 

Prepared for SWCA Environmental Consultants. Tucson, Arizona: SRK Consulting. April 

14.

de Vor, F., and H. L. F. de Groot. 2009. The Impact of Industrial Sites on Residential Property 

Values: A Hedonic Pricing Analysis for The Netherlands. Tinbergen Institute Discussion 

Paper TI 2009-035/3. Amsterdam, The Netherlands: Faculty of Economics and Business 

Administration, Vrije Universiteit University Amsterdam, and Tinbergen Institute.

Dean Runyan Associates. 2008. Arizona Travel Impacts 1998–2007p. Prepared for the Arizona 

Office of Tourism. Portland, Oregon: Dean Runyan Associates. June.

Debowski, S. S. 1980. The ANAMAX-Rosemont Project: An Archaeological Evaluation in the Santa 

Rita Mountains. Vol. 1. Manuscript on file, Cultural Resource Management Section, Arizona 

State Museum, University of Arizona, Tucson.
Chapter 6. Literature Cited

Draft Environmental Impact Statement for the Rosemont Copper Project 785

Derby, J. 2010. Rosemont Copper Project Alternatives for Detailed Analysis. File Code 1950-3/2810. 

Tucson, Arizona: Coronado National Forest. May 10.

Dongoske, K. 2009. Rosemont mine proposal: Zuni concerns. Verbal communication to Mary Farrell, 

Coronado National Forest. Telephone contact record. September 11. 

Drewes, H. 1971. Mesozoic Stratigraphy of the Santa Rita Mountains, Southeast of Tucson, Arizona. 

Professional Paper 658-C. Mesozoic Stratigraphy in Southeastern Arizona. Washington, 

D.C.: U.S. Geological Survey.

———. 1972a. Cenozoic Rocks of the Santa Rita Mountains, Southeast of Tucson, Arizona. 

Professional Paper 746. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Government Printing Office.

———. 1972b. Structural Geology of the Santa Rita Mountains, Southeast of Tucson, Arizona. 

Professional Paper 748. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Government Print Office.

DuBois, S. M., A. W. Smith, N. K. Nye, and Thaddeus A. Nowak Jr. 1982. Arizona Earthquakes, 

1776–1980. Bulletin 193: State of Arizona, Bureau of Geology and Mineral Technology, 

Geological Survey Branch.

Economic Profile System. 2007a. A SocioEconomic Profile: Cochise County, Arizona. Economic 

Profile System.

———. 2007b. A SocioEconomic Profile: Pima County, Arizona. Economic Profile System.

———. 2007c. A SocioEconomic Profile: Santa Cruz County, Arizona. Economic Profile System.

Elek, A. 2010. Fire Prevention Officer, Nogales Ranger District, Coronado National Forest, Nogales, 

Arizona. Proposal to Mitigate Impacts to OHV Use in Rosemont. Written communication 

from A. Elek to D. Kriegel, U.S. Forest Service. February 2. 

Ellis, L. A., D. M. Weddle, S. D. Stump, H. C. English, and A. E. Graber. 2008. Southwestern Willow 

Flycatcher Final Survey and Nest Monitoring Report. Research Technical Guidance Bulletin 

No. 10. Phoenix: Research Branch, Wildlife Management Division, Arizona Game and Fish 

Department. February.

Errol L. Montgomery and Associates Inc. 2009a. Groundwater Flow Modeling Conducted for 

Simulation of Rosemont Copper's Proposed Mine Supply Pumping, Sahuarita, Arizona.

Prepared for Rosemont Copper Company. Tucson, Arizona: Errol L. Montgomery and 

Associates, Inc. April 30.

———. 2009b. Results of Phase 2 Hydrogeologic Investigations and Monitoring Program, Rosemont 

Project, Pima County, Arizona. Prepared for Rosemont Copper Company. Tucson, Arizona: 

Errol L. Montgomery and Associates, Inc. February 26.

———. 2009c. Second Update to ADWR Model in Sahuarita/Green Valley Area. Project No. 

1232.0903. Prepared for Rosemont Copper Company. Submitted to Arizona Department of 

Water Resources. Tucson, Arizona: Errol L. Montgomery and Associates, Inc. April 27.
Chapter 6. Literature Cited

786 Draft Environmental Impact Statement for the Rosemont Copper Project

———. 2010. Addendum to Groundwater Flow Modeling Conducted for Simulation of Rosemont 

Copper's Proposed Mine Supply Pumping, Sahuarita, Arizona. Prepared for Rosemont 

Copper. Tucson, Arizona. November 11.

Ezzo, J. A., D. Gilpin, S. Griset, E. S. Petersen, II, and S. M. Whittlesey. 2011. Archaeological 

Survey for the Proposed Rosemont Copper Mine, Pima County, Arizona. Cultural Resources

Report No. 09-35. Prepared on behalf of Rosemont Copper Company. Prepared for Coronado 

National Forest, U.S. Forest Service. Tucson, Arizona: SWCA Environmental Consultants. 

February.

Farrell, M. 2009. Consideration of Archaeological and Tribal Issues in Rosemont Alternatives. 

Heritage Resources Report No. 2009-05-103. Tucson, Arizona: U.S. Forest Service, 

Coronado National Forest. April 14,.

Federal Interagency Committee on Urban Noise. 1980. Guidelines for Considering Noise in Land 

Use Planning and Control. June.

Fehmi, J. S. 2007. Final Report for Phase I. Prepared for August Resource Corporation. Tucson: 

School of Natural Resources, University of Arizona. July 6.

Fehmi, J. S., T. M. Kong, and L. Wood. 2008. Phase II—Final Project Report. Prepared for August 

Resource Corporation. Tucson: School of Natural Resources, University of Arizona. 

December 17.

Fenneman, N. M. 1931. Physiography of Western United States. New York: McGraw-Hill.

Ferg, A., K. C. Rozen, W. L. Deaver, M. D. Tagg, D. A. Phillips, Jr., and D. A. Gregory. 1984a. 

Hohokam Habitation Sites in the Northern Santa Rita Mountains. Archaeological Series 

No. 147, Vol. 2, Pt. 1. Tucson, Arizona: Cultural Resource Management Division, Arizona 

State Museum, University of Arizona.

———. 1984b. Hohokam Habitation Sites in the Northern Santa Rita Mountains. Archaeological 

Series No. 147, Vol. 2, Pts. 1 and 2. Tucson, Arizona: Cultural Resource Management 

Division, Arizona State Museum, University of Arizona.

Ferguson, C. 2011. Email communication with C. Garrett, SWCA, and B. Everson, U.S. Forest 

Service. Geological unit definitions. August 26. 

Ferguson, C. A. 2009. Bedrock geologic map of the northern part of the Empire Ranch 7 1/2' 

quadrangle, Pima County, Arizona (v. 1). Open-File Report 09-05. Tucson, Arizona: Arizona 

Geological Survey.

Ferguson, C. A., B. J. Johnson, P. A. Pearthree, J. E. Spencer, T. C. Shipman, and J. P. Cook. 2009. 

Geologic map of the Helvetia 7 1/2' quadrangle, Pima County, Arizona (v. 1.0). Open-File 

Report 09-06. Tucson, Arizona: Arizona Geological Survey. September.

Ferguson, C. A., A. Youberg, W. G. Gilbert, T. R. Orr, S. M. Richard, and J. E. Spencer. 2001. 

Geologic map of the Mount Fagan 7.5’ quadrangle, eastern Pima County, Arizona. Digital 

Geologic Map 11. Scale 11:24,000. Tucson, Arizona: Arizona Geological Survey.
Chapter 6. Literature Cited

Draft Environmental Impact Statement for the Rosemont Copper Project 787

Friends of Madera Canyon. 2009. Welcome to Friends of Madera Canyon. Available at: 

http://www.friendsofmaderacanyon.org/. Accessed September 2, 2010.

Gamby, E., and P. Reid. 2005. Gold mining: Environmental stigma or property value enhancement. 

Paper presented at the Eleventh Annual Pacific-Rim Real Estate Society Conference, January 

23–27, 2005, University of Melbourne, Australia.

Ganey, J. L., and R. P. Balda. 1989. Distribution and habitat use of Mexican spotted owls in Arizona. 

The Condor 91:355–361.

Gilmore, J. S., D. Hammond, K. D. Moore, J. F. Johnson, and D. C. Coddington. 1982. 

Socioeconomic Impacts of Power Plants. Research Project 1226-4. Prepared for Electric 

Power Research Institute. Denver, Colorado: Denver Research Institute and Browne, Bortz, 

and Coddington. February.

Glasser, S., J. Gauthier-Warinner, J. Gurrieri, J. Keely, P. Tucci, P. Summers, M. Wireman, and 

K. McCormack. 2007. FS-881 - Technical Guide to Managing Groundwater Resources.

U.S. Forest Service, U.S. Geological Survey, Bureau of Land Management, and U.S. 

Environmental Protection Agency. May.

Golder Associates Inc. 2010. Rosemont Mine Landforming, Evaluation of Mine Waste Slope 

Geometry. Project No. 093-81962. Prepared for SWCA Environmental Consultants. 

Lakewood, Colorado: Golder Associates Inc. February 17.

Goodquarry. 2011. Dust Impacts: Ecology and agriculture. Available at: 

http://www.goodquarry.com/article.aspx?id=56&navid=2. Accessed May 3, 2011.

Griset, S. 2011. An Ethnohistory of the Rosemont Copper Project Area in the Eastern Santa Rita 

Mountains, Pima County, Arizona. Cultural Resources Report No. 2009-238. Prepared for 

U.S. Forest Service, Coronado National Forest. Prepared on behalf of Rosemont Copper 

Company. Tucson, Arizona: SWCA Environmental Consultants.

Hand, M. S., J. A. Thatcher, D. W. McCollum, and R. P. Berrens. 2008a. Forest amenities and 

location choice in the Southwest. Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics 

Association 33(2):232–253.

———. 2008b. Intra-regional amenities, wages, and home prices: The role of forests in the 

Southwest. Land Economics 84(4):635–651.

Hardy, J. J., Jr. 1997. Superimposed Laramide and Middle Tertiary Deformations in the Northern 

Santa Rita Mountains, Pima County. Unpublished Ph.D. dissertation, Geology and 

Geological Engineering, Colorado School of Mines, Golden, Colorado.

Hargis, D. R., and J. W. Harshbarger. n.d. (1978). Hydrology of the Rosemont Area. In An 

Environmental Inventory of the Rosemont Area in Southern Arizona, Volume I: The Present 

Environment, edited by R. Davis and J.R. Callahan. Tucson: University of Arizona.

Hatten, J. R., A. Averill-Murray, and W. E.Van Pelt. 2003. Characterizing and Mapping Potential 

Jaguar Habitat in Arizona. Technical Report No. 203. Phoenix: Nongame and Endangered 

Wildlife Program, Arizona Game and Fish Department. January.
Chapter 6. Literature Cited

788 Draft Environmental Impact Statement for the Rosemont Copper Project

Haws, N. W., and T. Leeson. 2010. Technical Review of Response to Comments on Groundwater

Flow Modeling Conducted for Rosemont Copper Company Mine Supply Pumping. Tempe, 

Arizona: MWH Global. August 9.

———. 2011. Technical Review of Addendum to Groundwater Flow Modeling Conducted for 

Rosemont Copper Company Mine Supply Pumping. Reference No. 1005979. Tempe, 

Arizona: MWH Americas, Inc. January 18.

Hayes, P. T. 1969. Geology and Mineral Resources of Arizona. Arizona Bureau of Mines Bulletin 

180, Part 1.

Haynes, C. V. 1980. Appendix A: Preliminary Report on the ANAMAX Fossil Site. In The 

ANAMAX-Rosemont Project: An Archaeological Evaluation in the Santa Rita Mountains, 

edited by S.S. Debowski. Tucson, Arizona: Cultural Resource Management Section, Arizona 

State Museum, University of Arizona.

Heffelfinger, J. n.d. (2011). Rosemont Game/Hunter effects table.

Herriges, J. A., S. Secchi, and B. A. Babcock. 2003. Living with Hogs in Iowa: the Impact of 

Livestock Facilities on Rural Residential Property Values. Working Paper 03-WP 342. 

Ames, Iowa: Center for Agricultural and Rural Development, Iowa State University. August.

Hill, C. A. 1999. Overview of Kartchner Caverns, Arizona. Journal of Cave and Karst Studies

61(2):41–43.

Hockridge, B. J. 2011. Manager, Global Emissions Certification, Large Power Systems Division 

(MOS 11), Caterpillar Inc. Mossville, Illinois. Letter regarding Caterpillar's engine emissions

tests. 

Huckell, B. B. 1980. The ANAMAX-Rosemont Testing Project. Review draft. Tucson, Arizona: 

Cultural Resource Management Section, Arizona State Museum, University of Arizona.

———. 1981. An Archaeological Survey of Two Parcels of Land Added to the ANAMAX-Rosemont 

Land Exchange Area. Tucson, Arizona: Cultural Resource Management Section, Arizona 

State Museum, University of Arizona.

———. 1984a. The Archaic Occupation of the Rosemont Area, Northern Santa Rita Mountains, 

Southeastern Arizona. Archaeological Series No. 147, Vol. 1. Tucson, Arizona: Cultural 

Resource Management Division, Arizona State Museum, University of Arizona.

———. 1984b. Sobaipuri Sites in the Rosemont Area. In Miscellaneous Archaeological Studies in 

the ANAMAX-Rosemont Land Exchange Area, edited by M.D. Tagg, R.G. Ervin, and B.B. 

Huckell, pp. 107–130. Archaeological Series No. 147, Vol. 4. Tucson, Arizona: Cultural 

Resource Management Division, Arizona State Museum, University of Arizona.

Hudson, A. L., and M. A. Williamson. 2011. Rosemont Facility Fate and Transport Modeling 

Response to Comments. Document No. 113/11-320878-5.3. Tucson, Arizona: Tetra Tech. 

May 16.
Chapter 6. Literature Cited

Draft Environmental Impact Statement for the Rosemont Copper Project 789

Hughes, K. 2011. Bureau of Land Management, Tucson Office. Lesser Long-nosed Bat information 

for the Helvetia area. Email communication to Geoff Soroka, SWCA Environmental 

Consultants Biologist/Project Manager. March 29. 

Huss, C. 2009. Rosemont Copper Project Updated Feasibility Study, Vol. 1: NI 43-101 Technical 

Report. Project No. M3-PN08036. Prepared for Augusta Resource Corporation. Tucson, 

Arizona: M3 Engineering and Technology Corporation. January 14.

Institute for Bird Populations. 2006. MAPS breeding status information. Available at: 

http://www.birdpop.org/nbii2006/status/statusresults.asp?strStation=12334. Accessed May 

27, 2011.

Interagency Federal Wildland Fire Policy Review Working Group. 2001. Review and Update of the 

1995 Federal Wildland Fire Management Policy. Boise, Idaho: National Interagency Fire 

Center. January.

Interagency Monitoring of Protected Visual Environments. 2010. Views data wizard. Available at: 

http://views.cira.colostate.edu/web/DataWizard/. Accessed September 7, 2010.

Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. 2007. Summary for policymakers. In Climate Change 

2007: The Physical Science Basis—Contribution of Working Group I to the Fourth 

Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, edited by S. 

Solomon, D. Qin, M. Manning, Z. Chen, M. Marquis, K.B. Averyt, M. Tignor, and H.L. 

Miller. New York: Cambridge University Press.

International Association of Fish and Wildlife Agencies. 2002. Economic Importance of Hunting in 

America. Washington, D.C.

Jenkins, P. 2010. Plant species. Email communication to L. Jones, U.S. Forest Service, July 7. 

Johnson, B. J., and C. A. Ferguson. 2007. Geologic map of the Rosemont area, northern Santa Rita 

Mountains, Pima County, Arizona (v. 1.1). Digital Geologic Map 59. Scale 51:12,000. 

Tucson, Arizona: Arizona Geological Survey. January.

Karl, R. 2011. AZSITE, Arizona State Museum, University of Arizona. Gathering cultural resource

data for Rosemont DEIS. Telephone communication to Suzanne Griset, SWCA 

Environmental Consultants. February 21. 

Karl, T. R., J. M. Melillo, and T. C. Peterson (eds.). 2009. Global Climate Change Impacts in the 

United States. Cambridge University Press.

Kesner, B. R., and P. C. Marsh. 2010. Central Arizona Project Fish Monitoring: Final Report. 

Analysis of Fish Population Monitoring Data for Selected Waters of the Gila River Basin, 

Arizona, for the Five Year Period 2005-2009. Contract No. R09PD32013. Submitted to 

U.S. Bureau of Reclamation. Tempe, Arizona: Marsh and Associates, LLC.

Kilgore, B. M. 1981. Fire in ecosystem distribution and structure: western forests and scrublands. 

In Proceedings of the Conference Fire Regimes and Ecosystem Properties, edited by H.A. 

Mooney, T.M. Bonnicksen, and N.L. Christensen, pp. 58–89. General Technical Report WOGTR-26. U.S. Forest Service.
Chapter 6. Literature Cited

790 Draft Environmental Impact Statement for the Rosemont Copper Project

Kim, H.-S., and D. Harris. 1996. Air quality and view degradations due to copper mining and milling: 

Preliminary analysis and cost estimates for Green Valley, Arizona. Nonrenewable Resources

5(2):91–102.

Kim, J., P. Goldsmith, and M. Thomas. 2004. Using spatial economics to assess the impact of swine 

production on residential property values. Paper presented at the American Agricultural 

Economics Association, July 2004, Denver, Colorado.

Krizek, D. R. 2010a. Technical Memorandum: Barrel and McCleary Alternative Stormwater

Assessment. Document No. 058/10-320871-5.3. Prepared for Rosemont Copper Company. 

Tucson, Arizona: Tetra Tech. March 5.

———. 2010b. Technical Memorandum: Barrel Only Stormwater Assessment. Document No. 

059/10-320871-5.3. Prepared for Rosemont Copper Company. Tucson, Arizona: Tetra Tech. 

March 5.

———. 2010c. Technical Memorandum: Mine Plan of Operations Stormwater Assessment. 

Document No. 062/10-320871-5.3. Prepared for Rosemont Copper Company. Tucson, 

Arizona: Tetra Tech. March 5.

———. 2010d. Technical Memorandum: Scholefield Tailings and McCleary Waste Alternative 

Stormwater Assessment. Document No. 060/10-320871-5.3. Prepared for Rosemont Copper 

Company. Tucson, Arizona: Tetra Tech. March 5.

L. William Seidman Research Institute, W.P. Carey School of Business, and Arizona State 

University. 2009. An assessment of the economic impacts of the Rosemont Copper Project. 

In Study of Mineral Production with Reference to the Rosemont Copper Project, Pt. 2, edited 

by M.M. Singh. Special Report No. 24. Phoenix, Arizona: Arizona Department of Mines and 

Mineral Resources. July.

Laford, R. 2010. Rosemont EIS: VMS vs. SMS. R. Laford, U.S. Forest Service, response to email 

from D. Kriegel, U.S. Forest Service. August 2. 

Leake, S. A., and D. V. Claar. 1999. Procedures and Computer Programs for Telescopic Mesh 

Refinement Using MODFLOW. Open-File Report 99-238. Tucson, Arizona: U.S. Geological

Survey.

Lee, M. E., and B. L. Driver. 1999. Benefits-based management: A new paradigm for managing 

amenity resources. In Ecosystem Management: Adaptive Strategies for Natural Resources 

Organizations in the 21st Century, edited by J. Aley, W.R. Burch, B. Conover, and D. Field, 

pp. 143–154. Philadelphia, Pennsylvania: Taylor and Francis.

Lefevre, R. E. 1995. Watershed, Soil, and Air Existing Conditions for Santa Rita East. Tucson, 

Arizona: Coronado National Forest, U.S. Forest Service. November 2.

———. 2010. Rosemont Mine Reclamation: What to Expect. Tucson, Arizona: U.S. Forest Service, 

Coronado National Forest. June 28.

Lehman, R. N. 2001. Raptor electrocution on power lines: Current issues and outlook. Wildlife

Society Bulletin 29(3):804–813.
Chapter 6. Literature Cited

Draft Environmental Impact Statement for the Rosemont Copper Project 791

Levick, L. R., D. C. Goodrich, M. Fernandez, J. Fonseca, D. J. Semmens, J. Stromberg, M. Tluczek, 

R. A. Leidy, M. Scianni, D. P. Guertin, and W. G. Kepner. 2008. The Ecological and 

Hydrological Significance of Ephemeral and Intermittent Streams in the Arid and Semi-arid 

American Southwest. EPA/600/R-08/134; ARS/233046. U.S. Environmental Protection 

Agency and Agricultural Research Service Southwest Watershed Research Center.

Lockwood, S. 2010. DeBaud Allotment Rangeland Monitoring Analysis. Memorandum File Code 

No. 2210. Nogales, Arizona: Coronado National Forest, U.S. Forest Service. January 11.

Longcore, T., and C. Rich. 2004. Ecological light pollution. Front Ecol Environ 2(4):191-198.

López González, C. A., D. E. Brown, and J. P. Gallo-Reynoso. 2003. The Ocelot Leopardus pardalis

in north-western Mexico: Ecology, distribution and conservation status. Oryx 37:358–364. 

July.

Lowe, C. H., and T. B. Johnson. n.d. (1977). Fishes, amphibians, and reptiles of the Rosemont site. 

In An Environmental Inventory of the Rosemont Area in Southern Arizona, Vol. 1: The 

Present Environment, edited by R. Davis and J.R. Callahan.

M3 Engineering and Technology Corporation. 2009. Rosemont Mine Outdoor Lighting and Pima 

County Outdoor Lighting Code Technical Memo. M3-PN08036. Prepared for Rosemont 

Copper Company. Tucson, Arizona.

———. 2011. Rosemont Mine Outdoor Lighting and Pima County Outdoor Lighting Code Technical 

Memo. M3-PN08036. Rev. Prepared for Rosemont Copper Company. Tucson, Arizona: 

M3 Engineering and Technology Corporation.

Marlow, J. E. 2007. Mining's Potential Economic Impacts in the Santa Rita and Patagonia 

Mountains Region of Southeastern Arizona. Prepared for Save the Scenic Santa Ritas. 

Tucson, Arizona: Sonoran Institute. December.

Marsh, P. C., and B. R. Kesner. 2011. Central Arizona Project Fish Monitoring Final Annual Report: 

Summary of Sample Year 2010 Fish Surveys in Behalf of a Long-Term Monitoring Plan for 

Fish Populations in Selected Water of the Gila River Basin, Arizona. Contract No. 

R09PD32013. Submitted to Bureau of Reclamation. Tempe, Arizona: Marsh and Associates, 

LLC. July 12.

Mason, D. A., and L. Bota. 2006. Regional Groundwater Flow Model of the Tucson Active 

Management Area, Tucson, Arizona: Simulation and Application. Modeling Report No. 13. 

Phoenix, Arizona: Arizona Department of Water Resources, Hydrology Division.

McCain, E. B., and J. L. Childs. 2008. Evidence of resident Jaguars (Panthera onca) in the 

southwestern United States and the implications for conservation. Journal of Mammalogy

89(1):1–10.

McKay, G. 2010. Rosemont mine boundary management mitigation. Manuscript on file, SWCA 

Environmental Consultants, Tucson, Arizona.
Chapter 6. Literature Cited

792 Draft Environmental Impact Statement for the Rosemont Copper Project

McLaughlin, S., and W. Van Asdall. 1977. Flora and vegetation of the Rosemont area. In An 

Environmental Inventory of the Rosemont Area in Southern Arizona, Vol. 1: The Present 

Environment, edited by R. Davis and J.R. Callahan, pp. 64–98. Tucson: University of 

Arizona.

Menges, C. M., and P. A. Pearthree. 1983. Map of neotectonic (Latest Pliocene-Quaternary) 

deformation in Arizona. Open-File Report 83-22. Tucson, Arizona: Arizona Geological 

Survey.

———. 1989. Late Cenozoic tectonism in Arizona and its impact on regional landscape evolution. 

In Geologic Evolution of Arizona, edited by J.P. Jenney and S.J. Reynolds, pp. 649–680. 

Digest No. 17. Tucson, Arizona: Arizona Geological Society.

Metesh, J. J., T. Jarrell, and S. Oravetz. 1998. Treating Acid Mine Drainage from Abandoned Mines 

in Remote Areas. Project No. 7E72G71. Missoula, Montana: U.S. Forest Service, Technology 

and Development Program. October.

Miller, W. B. n.d. (1977). Invertebrates (other than insects) of the Rosemont area. In An 

Environmental Inventory of the Rosemont Area in Southern Arizona, Vol. 1: The Present 

Environment, edited by R. Davis and J.R. Callahan.

Mindat. 2010a. Daylight-Narragansett Mines (Narragansett-Daylight Mines), Rosemont (Rosemont 

Camp), Helvetia-Rosemont District, Santa Rita Mountains, Pima County, Arizona, USA. 

Available at: http://www.mindat.org/loc-36104.html. Accessed October 4, 2010.

———. 2010b. Santa Rita Quarry (Santa Rita limestone; calcium products of Arizona Quarry; Pfizer 

Specialty Minerals Marble Quarry; Specialty Minerals Inc.; Sabado No. 1 - O.S. 1 & 2 -

Butch 1-3 & 5), Helvetia-Rosemont District, Santa Rita Mountains, Pima County, Arizona, 

USA. Available at: http://www.mindat.org/loc-36150.html. Accessed August 6, 2010.

Minnesota IMPLAN Group. 2008. Cochise, Pima, and Santa Cruz Counties. Available at: 

http://implan.com/v3/. Accessed May 27, 2011.

Montgomery and Associates Inc. 2009. Groundwater Flow Modeling Conducted for Simulation of 

Proposed Rosemont Pit Dewatering and Post-closure, Rosemont Project, Pima County, 

Arizona. Prepared for Rosemont Copper Company. Tucson, Arizona: Montgomery and 

Associates. October 28.

———. 2010. Revised Report: Groundwater Flow Modeling Conducted for Simulation of Proposed 

Rosemont Pit Dewatering and Post-closure, Vol. 1: Text and Tables. Prepared for Rosemont 

Copper. Tucson, Arizona: Montgomery and Associates Inc. August 30.

Myers, T. 2008. Hydrogeology of the Santa Rita Rosemont Project Site Numerical Groundwater

Modeling of the Conceptual Flow Model and Effects of the Construction of the Proposed 

Open Pit. Prepared for Pima County Regional Flood Control District. Reno, Nevada. April.

———. 2010a. Technical Memorandum: Review of the Proposed Rosemont Ranch Mine 

Hydrogeologic Analysis and Groundwater Model. Prepared for Pima County. Reno, Nevada. 

February.
Chapter 6. Literature Cited

Draft Environmental Impact Statement for the Rosemont Copper Project 793

———. 2010b. Technical Memorandum: Updated Groundwater Modeling Report Proposed 

Rosemont Open Pit Mining Project. Prepared for Pima County and Pima County Regional 

Flood Control District. Reno, Nevada. April 21.

National Audubon Society. 2010. Arizona's Important Bird Areas Program. Available at: 

http://iba.audubon.orgfibalviewState.do?state=US-AZ. Accessed July 22, 2010.

National Park Service. 1999. National Register Bulletin—How to Complete the National Register 

Multiple Property Documentation Form. Originally published 1991, U.S. Department of the 

Interior, National Park Service, Cultural Resources, National Register, History and 

Education, Washington, D.C.

———. 2007. Interim Outdoor Lighting Guidelines (Draft). Version 1.0. National Park Service 

Night Sky Team. January 30.

———. 2011. Visual Impacts of the Rosemont Copper Mine on Saguaro National Park. July 28.

National Scenic Byways Program. 2010. Patagonia-Sonoita Scenic Road. Available at: 

http://www.byways.org/explore/byways/11288/. Accessed December 14, 2010.

Natural Resources Conservation Service. 2006. Land Resource Regions and Major Land Resource 

Areas of the United States, the Caribbean, and the Pacific Basin. Handbook 296: 

U.S. Department of Agriculture 

———. 2010a. Ecological site description: plant communities. Available at: 

http://esis.sc.egov.usda.gov. Accessed September 10, 2010.

———. 2010b. Web Soil Survey. Available at: usda.gov/app/WebSoilSurvey.aspx. Accessed 

September 10, 2010.

NatureServe. 2010. Agosia chrysogaster - Girard, 1856. Available at: 

http://www.natureserve.org/explorer/servlet/NatureServe?sourceTemplate=tabular_report.w

mt&loadTemplate=species_RptComprehensive.wmt&selectedReport=RptComprehensive.w

mt&summaryView=tabular_report.wmt&elKey=104658&paging=home&save=true&startInd

ex=1&nextStartIndex=1&reset=false&offPageSelectedElKey=104658&offPageSelectedElTy

pe=species&offPageYesNo=true&post_processes=&radiobutton=radiobutton&selectedIndex

es=104658&selectedIndexes=791508&selectedIndexes=791510. Accessed August 29, 2011.

———. 2011a. Amoreuzia gonzalezii. Available at: 

http://www.natureserve.org/explorer/servlet/NatureServe?sourceTemplate=tabular_report.... 

Accessed May 28, 2011.

———. 2011b. Aspidoscelis burti stictogrammus. Available at: 

http://www.natureserve.org/explorer/servlet/NatureServe?sourceTemplate=tabular_report.... 

Accessed May 28, 2011.

———. 2011c. Gopherus agassizii pop. 2. Available at: 

http://www.natureserve.org/explorer/servlet/NatureServe?sourceTemplate=tabular_report.... 

Accessed May 28, 2011.
Chapter 6. Literature Cited

794 Draft Environmental Impact Statement for the Rosemont Copper Project

———. 2011d. Senticolis triaspis. Available at: 

http://www.natureserve.org/explorer/servlet/NatureServe?sourceTemplate=tabular_report.... 

Accessed May 28, 2011.

NoiseQuest. 2011. What Does Noise Affect? Available at: 

http://www.noisequest.psu.edu/pmwiki.php?n=NoiseAffect.Wildlife. Accessed August 29, 

2011.

O'Brien, G. 2010a. Technical Memorandum: Groundwater Flow Model Construction and 

Calibration. Document No. 198/10-320874-5.3. Prepared for Rosemont Copper Company. 

Tucson, Arizona: Tetra Tech. July 26.

———. 2010b. Technical Memorandum: Hydrogeologic Framework Model. Document No. 170/10-

320874-5.3. Prepared for Rosemont Copper Company. Tucson, Arizona: Tetra Tech. July 9.

———. 2010c. Technical Memorandum: Predictive Groundwater Flow Modeling Results. Document 

No. 201/10-320874-5.3. Prepared for Rosemont Copper Company. Tucson, Arizona: Tetra 

Tech. July 30.

———. 2010d. Technical Memorandum: Steady-State Sensitivity Analyses. Document No. 202/10-

320874-5.3. Prepared for Rosemont Copper Company. Tucson, Arizona: Tetra Tech. July 30.

Pacific Southwest Inter-Agency Committee. 1968. Factors Affecting Sediment Yield in the Pacific 

Southwest Area. In Report of the Water Management Subcommittee on Factors Affecting 

Sediment Yield in the Pacific Southwest Area and Selection and Evaluation of Measures for 

Reduction of Erosion and Sediment Yield. Pacific Southwest Inter-Agency Committee. 

October.

Park, S. 2010. Technical Memorandum: Rosemont Traffic Study—Additional Scenarios. Document 

No. 047/10-320842-5.3. Prepared for Rosemont Copper Company. Tucson, Arizona: Tetra 

Tech. February 23.

Parker, P. L., and T. F. King. 1998. National Register Bulletin—Guidelines for Evaluating and 

Documenting Traditional Cultural Properties. Originally published 1990 (revised 1992), 

U.S. Department of the Interior, National Park Service, Washington, D.C.

Partners in Flight. 2006. Map of the Bird Conservation Regions of the United States. Available at: 

http://www.partnersinflight.org/bcps/pifplans.htm.

Peachey, W. 2000. Field Trip to Colossal Cave and the Surrounding Area, Pima County, Arizona: 

Arizona Geological Survey. February 19.

Pearce, M. J. 2007. Water rights data. Phoenix, Arizona: Maguire and Pearce, PLLC. Letter to J. 

Derby, Coronado National Forest. November 20. 

———. 2010. Maguire and Pearce, PLLC. Phoenix, Arizona. Written communication to Dale 

Ortman, Consulting Engineer, and Kathy Arnold, Director of Environmental and Regulatory 

Affairs, Rosemont Copper Company. November 1. 
Chapter 6. Literature Cited

Draft Environmental Impact Statement for the Rosemont Copper Project 795

Pearthree, P. A., and S. S. Calvo. 1987. The Santa Rita Fault Zone: Evidence for large magnitude 

earthquakes with very long recurrence intervals, Basin and Range Province of southeastern 

Arizona. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America 77(1):97–116.

Pearthree, P. A., C. M. Menges, and L. Mayer. 1983. Distribution, Recurrence, and Possible Tectonic 

Implications of Late Quaternary Faulting in Arizona. Open-File Report 83-20. Tucson, 

Arizona: Arizona Geological Survey.

Petersen, E. S., II. 2007. Archaeological Survey of Approximately 67.1 Acres in the Coronado 

National Forest, Pima County, Arizona. Cultural Resources Report No. 07-48. Tucson, 

Arizona: SWCA Environmental Consultants.

Petersen, E. S., II, and S. Griset. 2010. Results of an Archaeological Class I Inventory of Four 

Alternatives for the Proposed Rosemont Copper Mine, Rosemont Junction, Pima County, 

Arizona. Cultural Resources Report No. 10-47. Tucson, Arizona: SWCA Environmental 

Consultants.

Pima Association of Governments. 2011. Population estimates. Available at: 

http://www.pagnet.org/RegionalData/Population/PopulationEstimates/tabid/582/Default.as. 

Accessed May 25, 2011.

Pima County. 2001. Huachuca Water Umbel Report: Sonoran Desert Conservation and 

Comprehensive Land Use Plan Summer 2001. Tucson, Arizona.

———. 2006a. The Outdoor Lighting Code Available at: 

http://www.pimaxpress.com/Building/PDFs/2007/2006%20Outdoor%20Lighting%20Code.p

df. Accessed May 21, 2011.

———. 2006b. Priority Vulnerable Species in Pima County. Available at: 

http://www.pima.gov/cmo/sdcp/species/fsheets/vuln/vuln.html. Accessed April 15, 2011.

Pima County Department of Environmental Quality. 2009a. 2008 Air Quality Summary Report for 

Pima County. Tucson, Arizona. June.

———. 2009b. 2009 Air Quality Summary Report Appendix. Tucson, Arizona.

———. 2009c. 2009 Ambient Air Monitoring Network Plan. AQ 370. Prepared for the 

U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. Tucson, Arizona: Pima County Department of 

Environmental Quality.

———. 2011. 2010 Air Quality Summary Report for Pima County, Arizona. AQ-376. Tucson, 

Arizona: Pima County Department of Environmental Quality. July.

Pima County Department of Transportation. 2008. Revision of Traffic Noise Analysis and Mitigation

Guidance for Major Road Projects, Amendment to Statement of Purpose, and Cost Effective 

Criteria. Procedure No. 03-5. Amended. Tucson, Arizona: Pima County Department of 

Transportation. April 8.
Chapter 6. Literature Cited

796 Draft Environmental Impact Statement for the Rosemont Copper Project

Pima County Regional Flood Control District. 2010. Regulated Riparian Habitat Mitigation

Standards and Implementation Guidelines. Supplement to Title 16, Chapter 16.30, of the 

Watercourse and Riparian Habitat Protection and Mitigation Requirements Ordinance 

No. 2005-FC2. Tucson, Arizona. January.

Power, T. M. 2010. Scoping Comment Document: Analyses of Economic Costs of the Proposed 

Rosemont Copper Project. Prepared for The Mountain Empire Action Alliance. Submitted to 

the Coronado National Forest. Missoula, Montana. August 16.

Pratt, R., D. Nichols, and J. Davis. 2007. Dewatering for the Planned Rosemont Mine (FS MPO

Comments - Item Nos. 1 and 4 [GW-1 and GW-3]). Tucson, Arizona: Call and Nicholas and 

E.L. Montgomery. November 16.

Racing the Arizona Trail. 2010. Arizona Trail race results. Available at: 

http://www.topofusion.com/azt/results.php. Accessed October 5, 2010.

Radeloff, V. C., R. B. Hammer, S. I. Stewart, J. S. Fried, S. S. Holcomb, and J. F. McKeefry. 2005. 

The wildland-urban interface in the United States. Ecological Applications 15(3, June):

799–805. .

Ready, R., and C. Abdalla. 2003. GIS Analysis of Land Use on the Rural-Urban Fringe: The Impact 

of Land Use and Potential Local Disamenities on Residential Property Values and on the 

Location of Residential Development in Berks County, Pennsylvania. University Park, 

Pennsylvania: Pennsylvania State University.

Recreation Technical Advisory Team. 2003. Overview of Natural Resource Based Outdoor 

Recreation in Eastern Pima County. Submitted to Pima County Board of Supervisors. 

Tucson, Arizona. February.

Reichert, A. K. 1997. Impact of a toxic waste superfund site on property values. The Appraisal 

Journal October:381–392.

Robbie, W. 2009. Supervisory Soil Scientist, U.S. Forest Service. Record of contact regarding 

ephemeral channels that support upland vegetation. Robert L. Fefevre, Soil Scientist, 

Coronado National Forest, Tucson, Arizona. September. 

Robertson, H. D., J. E. Hummer, and D. C. Nelson (eds.). 1994. Manual of Transportation

Engineering Studies. Prepared by Institute of Transportation Engineers. Englewood, New 

Jersey: Prentice Hall.

Rose, W. L. 2008. 2008 Mineral Resource Update for the Rosemont Project Pima County, Arizona, 

USA. Prepared for Augusta Resource Corporation. Lakewood, Colorado: WLF Consulting, 

Inc. December 4.

Rosemont Copper Company. 2010. Rosemont Copper Company Santa Rita Mountains Community 

Endowment Trust :Trust Concept. Rev. Tucson, Arizona: Rosemont Copper Company. 

September 15.
Chapter 6. Literature Cited

Draft Environmental Impact Statement for the Rosemont Copper Project 797

Rosemont Copper Company, and United Sahuarita Well Owners LLC. 2009. Well Protection 

Program Master Agreement, with Amendment No. 1 dated December 17, 2010. Docket 

13726: Recorded in Pima County, Arizona. Drafted by Maguire and Pearce, PLLC, Phoenix, 

Arizona.

Rosen, P. C., and D. J. Caldwell. 2004. Aquatic and Riparian Herpetofauna of Las Cienegas National 

Conservation Area, Empire-Cienega Ranch, Pima County, Arizona. Prepared for Bureau of 

Land Management, Tucson Office. September 1.

Russell, J. C., and P. A. Adams-Russell. 2005. Values, Attitudes and Beliefs toward National Forest 

System Lands: The Coronado National Forest. Prepared for the Coronado National Forest 

and the U.S. Forest Service Southwestern Region. Placerville, California: Adams-Russell 

Consulting. June 28.

Schaefer, J. 1979. The ANAMAX Project: History of the Rosemont area in the Santa Rita Mountains, 

Arizona. Manuscript on file, Cultural Resource Management Section, Arizona State Museum, 

University of Arizona, Tucson, Arizona.

Schmalzel, R. J., and R. Archer. 2010. Rosemont Mine Project: Talus Snails (Sonorella, 

Helminthoglyptidae) and Talus Slopes of the North Ridge of the Santa Rita Mountains, Pima 

County, Arizona. Prepared for Rosemont Copper Company. Tucson, Arizona: WestLand 

Resources, Inc. April 15.

Schrader, F. C. 1915. Mineral Deposits of the Santa Rita and Patagonia Mountains, Arizona. Bulletin 

No. 582. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Geological Survey.

Sculley, R. 2010a. Technical Memorandum: Barrel and McCleary Alternative Noise Analysis. 

Document No. 014/10-320871-5.3. Prepared for Rosemont Copper Company. Tucson, 

Arizona: Tetra Tech. January 9.

———. 2010b. Technical Memorandum: Barrel Only Alternative Noise Analysis. Document 

No. 025/10-320871-5.3. Prepared for Rosemont Copper Company. Tucson, Arizona: Tetra 

Tech. January 15.

———. 2010c. Technical Memorandum: Partial Backfill Alternative Noise Analysis. Document 

No. 028/10-320871-5.3. Prepared for Rosemont Copper Company. Tucson, Arizona: Tetra 

Tech. January 23.

———. 2010d. Technical Memorandum: Scholefield Tailings and McCleary Waste Alternative Noise

Analysis. Document No. 024/10-320871-5.3. Prepared for Rosemont Copper Company. 

Tucson, Arizona: Tetra Tech. January 15.

———. 2010e. Technical Memorandum: Sycamore Tailings and Barrel Waste Alternative Noise

Analysis. Document No. 023/10-320871-5.3. Prepared for Rosemont Copper Company. 

Tucson, Arizona: Tetra Tech. January 15.

Servoss, J., B. Burger, and Y. Cage. 2007. Trip Report: Mexican Gartersnake Survey/Collection 

Effort, Las Cienegas National Conservation Area, September 6-8.
Chapter 6. Literature Cited

798 Draft Environmental Impact Statement for the Rosemont Copper Project

Shaw, D., T. Robison, J. Gass, W. Moir, H. G. Brown III, D. Potter, C. Spann, R. Fletcher, 

G. Robertson, R. G. Popp, W. Robbie, G. Miller, and O. Carleton. 1991. General Ecosystem 

Survey. U.S. Forest Service, Southwestern Region. March.

Sheehan, M. S., S. Swanson, and S. Shelley. 2010. A Cultural Resource Survey for the Rosemont 

Project Utility Corridor, Pima County, Arizona. Cultural Resource Services Technical Paper 

No. 2010-001. Phoenix, Arizona: Environmental Planning Group.

Sieber, M. 2011. Technical Review of Infiltration, Seepage, Fate and Transport Report—Revision 1, 

Part 1: Infiltration and Seepage Model Components. Project No. 183101. Prepared for 

SWCA Environmental Consultants. Tucson, Arizona: SRK Consulting. February 14.

Sieber, M., S. Day, and V. Ugorets. 2010. Technical Review of Infiltration, Seepage, Fate and 

Transport Modeling Report, Tetra Tech, 2010. Project No. 183101. Prepared for Rosemont 

Copper Company. Tucson, Arizona: SRK Consulting. April 30.

Silberman, J. n.d. (2003a). The Economic Importance of Fishing and Hunting: Economic Data on 

Fishing and Hunting for the State of Arizona and for each Arizona County. Prepared for 

Arizona Game and Fish Department. Phoenix, Arizona: School of Management, Arizona 

State University West.

———. n.d. (2003b). The Economic Importance of Off-Highway Vehicle Recreation: Economic Data 

on Off-Highway Vehicle Recreation for the State of Arizona and each Arizona County. 

Prepared for Arizona Game And Fish Department and Arizona State Parks. Phoenix, 

Arizona: School of Management, Arizona State University West.

Simms, J. R. 2002. Specimen collections. Fishery Biologist, Bureau of Land Management, Tucson, 

Arizona. Written communication to Peter Reinthal. December 30. 

Singh, M. M. 2009. An Assessment of the Economic Impacts of the Rosemont Copper Project on the 

Economies of the Cochise/Pima/Santa Cruz Counties Study Area, Arizona, and the United 

States. Special Report 26. Phoenix: Arizona Department of Mines and Mineral Resources. 

November.

Smith, L., G. Ruyle, J. Maynard, S. Barker, W. Meyer, D. Stewart, B. Coulloudon, S. Williams, and 

J. Dyess. 2007. Principles of Obtaining and Interpreting Utilization Data on Rangelands.

Tucson: University of Arizona Cooperative Extension. May.

Smolen, G. E., G. Moore, and L. V. Conway. 1992. Economic effects of hazardous chemical and 

proposed radioactive waste landfills on surrounding real estate values. Journal of Real Estate 

Research 7(3):283–295.

Society of Vertebrate Paleontology. 1995. SVP News Bulletin. Society of Vertebrate 

Paleontology(163).

———. 1996. SVP News Bulletin. Society of Vertebrate Paleontology(168).

Sogge, M. K., D. Ahlers, and S. J. Sferra. 2010. A Natural History Summary and Survey Protocol for 

the Southwestern Willow Flycatcher. Techniques and Methods 2A-10. Chapter 10 of Section 

A, Biological Science, Book 2, Collection of Environmental Data: U.S. Geological Survey, 

Bureau of Reclamation, and the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service.
Chapter 6. Literature Cited

Draft Environmental Impact Statement for the Rosemont Copper Project 799

Sonoran Desert Network. 2010. Visibility at Saguaro National Park. Air Quality Monitoring Brief 

Prepared for the National Park Service, Air Resources Division. Tucson, Arizona: Sonoran 

Desert Network.

Southwest Environmental Information Network. 2011a. Arid throne flea bane (Erigeron arisolius

Nesom) Available at: 

http://swbiodiversity.org/seinet/collections/list.php?type=1&taxa=Erigeron+arisolius&cou. 

Accessed March 28, 2011.

———. 2011b. Arizona manihot (Manihot davisiae Croizat). Available at: 

http://swbiodiversity.org/seinet/collections/list.php?type=1&taxa=Manihot+davisiae&coun. 

Accessed March 28, 2011.

———. 2011c. Bartram stonecrop (Graptopetalum bartramii Rose). Available at: 

http://swbiodiversity.org/seinet/collections/list.php?type=1&taxa=Graptopetalum+bartrami. 

Accessed March 28, 2011.

———. 2011d. Box Canyon muhly (Muhlenbergia dubioides C.O. Gooding). Available at: 

http://swbiodiversity.org/seinet/collections/list.php?type=1&taxa=Muhlenbergia+dubioide. 

Accessed March 28, 2011.

———. 2011e. Santa Rita yellowshow (Amoreuxia gonzalezii). Available at: 

http://swbiodiversity.org/seinet/collections/list.php?type=1&taxa=Amoreuxia+gonzalezii&. 

Accessed March 28, 2011.

———. 2011f. Sonoran noseburn (Tragia laciniata). Available at: 

http://swbiodiversity.org/seinet/collections/list.php?type=1&taxa=Tragia+laciniata&countr. 

Accessed March 28, 2011.

———. 2011g. Sycamore Canyon Muhly. Available at: 

http://swbiodiversity.org/seinet/collections/individual/index.php?occid=732667&clid=0. 

Accessed August 31, 2011.

Southwestern Region Climate Change and Forest Planning Work Group. 2010. Southwestern Region 

Climate Change Trends and Forest Planning: A Guide for Addressing Climate Change in 

Forest Plan Revisions for Southwestern National Forests and National Grasslands. Prepared 

for U.S. Forest Service, Southwestern Region. May.

Stebbins, R. C. 2003. A Field Guide to Western Reptiles and Amphibians. 3rd ed. Boston: Houghton 

Mifflin Company.

Steere, P. 2010. Tribal Historic Preservation Officer, Cultural Affairs Program, Tohono O'Odham 

Nation, Sells, Arizona. Comments and questions relating to the cultural resources report 

prepared by SWCA Environmental Consultants for the Rosemont Copper Project. Written 

communication from P. Steere to J. Derby, Forest Supervisor, Coronado National Forest. 

U.S. Forest Service. February. 

Stone, C., M. Sieber, and J. Kline. 2011. Review of Alternative Water Sources—Revised. SRK Project 

Number 183101/2200. Prepared for SWCA Environmental Consultants. Tucson, Arizona: 

SRK Consulting, Inc. May 13.
Chapter 6. Literature Cited

800 Draft Environmental Impact Statement for the Rosemont Copper Project

Stover, C. W., and J. L. Coffman. 1993. Seismicity of the United States, 1568-1989 (Revised). 

U.S. Geological Survey Professional Paper 1527. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Government 

Printing Office.

Sturgess, J. A. 2007. Supplemental Information to the Mine Plan of Operations, Rosemont Copper 

Company: Disposition of Existing Mine Workings. Technical Memorandum. Rosemont 

Copper Company and Augusta Resource Corporation. November 28.

Stynes, D. J. 2001. Estimating economic impacts of tourist spending on local regions: A comparison 

of satellite and survey/I-O approaches. Paper presented at the Censtates, TTRA Conference, 

September 20, 2001, Lisle, Illinois.

Swanson, S. 2011. Description of Helvetia Cemetery and Historic Property Inventory Form for 

Cemeteries and Graves, Helvetia Cemetery. Rev. Submitted to Todd Pietzel, Arizona State 

Museum, University of Arizona. Phoenix, Arizona: Environmental Planning Group. March 1.

Swanson, S., D. Sunderman, B. Snow, and C. Lonardo. 2010. A Cultural Resources Survey of the 

46kV Alternative and Additional Areas for the Rosemont Project 138kV Line, Pima County, 

Arizona. Cultural Resource Services Technical Paper No. 2010-0017. Prepared for Rosemont 

Copper Company. Phoenix, Arizona: Environmental Planning Group. September.

SWCA Environmental Consultants. 2011a. Draft Biological Evaluation, Rosemont Copper Project, 

Santa Rita Mountains, Nogales Ranger District. Prepared for U.S. Forest Service, Coronado 

National Forest. Tucson, Arizona: SWCA Environmental Consultants. July.

———. 2011b. Draft Biologists' Report on the Affected Environment and Identification of Species 

for Disclosure of Effects, Rosemont Copper Mine Project, Pima County, Arizona. Prepared 

for U.S. Forest Service, Coronado National Forest. Tucson, Arizona: SWCA Environmental 

Consultants. July.

———. 2011c. Draft Management Indicator Species Report, Rosemont Copper Project, Coronado 

National Forest, Pima County, Arizona. Prepared for U.S. Forest Service, Coronado National 

Forest. Tucson, Arizona: SWCA Environmental Consultants. July.

———. 2011d. Migratory Bird Analysis, Proposed Rosemont Copper Mine, Nogales Ranger 

District, Coronado National Forest. Tucson, Arizona: SWCA Environmental Consultants. 

July.

Tagg, M. D., R. G. Ervin, and B. B. Huckell. 1984. Miscellaneous Archaeological Studies in the 

ANAMAX-Rosemont Land Exchange Area. Archaeological Series No. 147, Vol. 4. Tucson, 

Arizona: Cultural Resource Management Division, Arizona State Museum, University of 

Arizona.

Tetra Tech. 2007a. Geologic Hazards Assessment. Project No. 320614. Prepared for Augusta 

Resource Corporation. Golden, Colorado: Tetra Tech. June.

———. 2007b. Geotechnical Study. Project No. 320617. Prepared for Augusta Resource 

Corporation. Tucson, Arizona: Tetra Tech. June.

———. 2007c. Reclamation and Closure Plan: Rosemont Copper. Project No. 320614-400. Prepared 

for Augusta Resource Corporation. Tucson, Arizona: Tetra Tech. July.
Chapter 6. Literature Cited

Draft Environmental Impact Statement for the Rosemont Copper Project 801

———. 2007d. Site Water Management Plan. Project No. 320614. Prepared for Augusta Resource 

Corporation. Golden, Colorado: Tetra Tech. June.

———. 2007e. Survey of Salvage Topsoil Resources. Project No. 320614. Prepared for Augusta 

Resource Corporation. Salt Lake City, Utah: Tetra Tech. June.

———. 2007f. Waste Management Plan. Project No. 320614. Prepared for Augusta Resource 

Corporation. Tucson, Arizona: Tetra Tech. June.

———. 2008. Background Ambient Noise Study. Project No. 114-320776 (100-SFO-T22436). 

Prepared for Rosemont Copper Company. Tucson, Arizona: Tetra Tech. October.

———. 2009a. Aquifer Protection Permit Application. 5 vols. Project No. 114-320794. Prepared for 

Rosemont Copper Company. Submitted to Arizona Department of Environmental Quality. 

Tucson, Arizona: Tetra Tech. February.

———. 2009b. AZ-83 Roadway Assessment Report, Rosemont Copper Project. Project Nos. 

134-20192-09001A, 134-20192-09002, and 114-320794. Prepared for Rosemont Copper 

Company. Irvine, California: Tetra Tech. July.

———. 2009c. Geotechnical Addendum. 3 vols. Project No. 320795. Prepared for Rosemont Copper 

Company. Tucson, Arizona: Tetra Tech. February.

———. 2009d. Supplemental Noise Study, Rosemont Copper Project. Project No. 114-320794 

(100-SFO-T22436; 100-SFO-T23373). Prepared for Rosemont Copper Company. Tucson, 

Arizona: Tetra Tech. April.

———. 2009e. Traffic Analysis Report, Rosemont Copper Company. Project Nos. 134-20192-

09001A and 114-320794-101.06. Prepared for Rosemont Copper Company. Irvine, 

California: Tetra Tech. April.

———. 2010a. Davidson Canyon Hydrogeologic Conceptual Model and Assessment of Spring

Impacts. Tetra Tech Project No. 114-320869. Prepared for Rosemont Copper. Tucson, 

Arizona. July.

———. 2010b. Geochemical Pit Lake Predictive Model. Tetra Tech Project No. 114-320777. 

Prepared for Rosemont Copper. Tucson, Arizona. February.

———. 2010c. Geochemical Pit Lake Predictive Model—Revision 1. Tetra Tech Project No. 114-

320884. Prepared for Rosemont Copper. Tucson, Arizona. November.

———. 2010d. Infiltration, Seepage, Fate and Transport Modeling Report. Tetra Tech Project 

No. 114-320794. Prepared for Rosemont Copper Company. Tucson, Arizona. February.

———. 2010e. Infiltration, Seepage, Fate and Transport Modeling Report - Revision 1. Tetra Tech 

Project No. 114-320884. Prepared for Rosemont Copper. Tucson, Arizona. August.

———. 2010f. Reclamation Concept Update: Rosemont Copper Project. Project No. 114-320832. 

Prepared for Rosemont Copper. Tucson, Arizona: Tetra Tech. March.
Chapter 6. Literature Cited

802 Draft Environmental Impact Statement for the Rosemont Copper Project

———. 2010g. Regional Groundwater Flow Model, Rosemont Copper Project. Tetra Tech Project 

No. 114-320874. Prepared for Rosemont Copper. Tucson, Arizona. November.

———. 2010h. Site Water Management Update. Project No. 114-320828. 5 vols. Prepared for 

Rosemont Copper Company. Tucson, Arizona: Tetra Tech. April.

———. 2011. Rosemont Primary Access Road Intersection: Traffic Analysis Report. 2 vols. Prepared 

for Arizona Department of Transportation. Tucson, Arizona: Tetra Tech. April 4.

The Arizona Arts Sciences and Technology Academy. 2007. Astronomy, Planetary Sciences, and 

Space Sciences Research Opportunities to Advance Arizona's Economic Growth. Chandler, 

Arizona: The Arizona Arts Sciences and Technology Academy.

The Tax Foundation. 2010. Tax research areas: Arizona. Available at: 

http://www.taxfoundation.org/research/topic/13.html. Accessed September 3, 2010.

Thornbrue, M. 2010. Rosemont Surface Water Quality Baseline Analysis. Document No. 112/10-

320828-5.3. Prepared for Rosemont Copper Company. Tucson, Arizona: Tetra Tech. April 

13.

Titley, S. R. 1995. Geological Summary and Perspective of Porphyry Copper Deposits in 

Southwestern North America. In Porphyry Copper Deposits of the American Cordillera, 

edited by F.W. Pierce and J.G. Bolm. Arizona Geological Society Digest 20.

Titley, S. R., and L. Zürcher. 2008. Regional geology and ore-deposit styles of the trans-border 

region, southwestern North America In Ores and Orogenesis: Circum-Pacific Tectonics, 

Geologic Evolution, and Ore Deposits edited by J.E. Spencer and S.R. Titley, pp. 275–276. 

Digest 22 Arizona Geological Society.

Tohono O'odham Legislative Branch. 2009. Resolution of the Tohono O'odham Legislative Council 

(Opposing the Proposed Rosemont Copper Project). Resolution No. 09-569. Available at: 

http://tolc-nsn.org/docs/Actions09/09569.pdf. Accessed August 29, 2011.

Town of Sahuarita, and General Plan Advisory Committee. 2002. General Plan Town of Sahuarita. 

Sahuarita, Arizona. December 9.

Transportation Research Board. 2000. Highway Capacity Manual. Washington, D.C.: Transportation 

Research Board.

Tucson Electric Power. 2011. Rosemont 138kV Transmission Line Project: Preferred Route and 

Alternatives. Draft. Available at: 

http://www.tep.com/Company/News/Rosemont/docs/Map_of_Preferred_and_Alternative_Ro

utes_(May_2011).pdf. Accessed August 24, 2011.

U.S. Army Corps of Engineers. 2008a. Jurisdictional Determinations. Regulatory Guidance Letter. 

June 26.

———. 2008b. Regional Supplement to the Corps of Engineers Wetland Delineation Manual: Arid 

West Region (Version 2.0). ERDC/EL TR-08-28. Vicksburg, MS: U.S. Army Engineer 

Research and Development Center. September.
Chapter 6. Literature Cited

Draft Environmental Impact Statement for the Rosemont Copper Project 803

U.S. Census Bureau. 1990. Total population for counties and towns. Available at: 

http://factfinder.census.gov/servlet/DTTable?_bm=y&-context=dt&-

ds_name=DEC_1990_STF3_&-CONTEXT=dt&-mt_name=DEC_1990_STF3_P001&-

tree_id=101&-redoLog=true&-all_geo_types=N&-geo_id=04000US04&-

geo_id=05000US04003&-geo_id=05000US04019&-geo_id=05000US04023&-

geo_id=16000US040235&-geo_id=16000US040286&-geo_id=16000US040315&-

geo_id=16000US040340&-geo_id=16000US040380&-search_results=04000US04&-

format=&-_lang=en&-SubjectID=17478267. Accessed May 26, 2011.

———. 2000a. Commute time. Available at: http://factfinder.census.gov/servlet/DTTable?_bm=y&-

state=dt&-context=dt&-ds_name=DEC_2000_SF3_U&-

mt_name=DEC_2000_SF3_U_P033&-tree_id=403&-redoLog=true&-all_geo_types=N&-

_caller=geoselect&-geo_id=04000US04&-geo_id=05000US04003&-

geo_id=05000US04019&-geo_id=05000US04023&-geo_id=16000US0422150&-

geo_id=16000US0429710&-geo_id=16000US0449640&-geo_id=16000US0460186&-

geo_id=16000US0462140&-geo_id=16000US0468220&-geo_id=16000US0468850&-

geo_id=16000US0475940&-geo_id=16000US0477000&-search_results=05000US04019&-

search_results=05000US04023&-format=&-_lang=en. Accessed May 27, 2011.

———. 2000b. Median age. Available at: http://factfinder.census.gov/servlet/DTTable?_bm=y&-

context=dt&-ds_name=DEC_2000_SF1_U&-CONTEXT=dt&-

mt_name=DEC_2000_SF1_U_P013&-tree_id=403&-redoLog=true&-all_geo_types=N&-

geo_id=04000US04&-geo_id=05000US04003&-geo_id=05000US04019&-

geo_id=05000US04023&-geo_id=16000US0422150&-geo_id=16000US0468220&-

geo_id=16000US0468850&-geo_id=16000US0475940&-geo_id=16000US0477000&-

search_results=05000US04023&-format=&-_lang=en&-SubjectID=17496267. Accessed 

May 26, 2011.

———. 2000c. Median home values. Available at: 

http://factfinder.census.gov/servlet/DTTable?_bm=y&-context=dt&-

ds_name=DEC_2000_SF3_U&-CONTEXT=dt&-mt_name=DEC_2000_SF3_U_H085&-

tree_id=403&-all_geo_types=N&-geo_id=05000US04003&-geo_id=05000US04019&-

geo_id=05000US04023&-search_results=01000US&-format=&-_lang=en&-

SubjectID=17499646. Accessed May 26, 2011.

———. 2000d. Personal household and family income. Available at: 

http://factfinder.census.gov/servlet/DTTable?_bm=y&-state=dt&-context=dt&-

ds_name=DEC_2000_SF3_U&-CONTEXT=dt&-mt_name=DEC_2000_SF3_U_P053&-

mt_name=DEC_2000_SF3_U_P085&-mt_name=DEC_2000_SF3_U_P077&-tree_id=403&-

all_geo_types=N&-redoLog=true&-geo_id=04000US04&-geo_id=05000US04003&-

geo_id=05000US04019&-geo_id=05000US04023&-geo_id=16000US0422150&-

geo_id=16000US0429710&-geo_id=16000US0449640&-geo_id=16000US0460186&-

geo_id=16000US0462140&-geo_id=16000US0468220&-geo_id=16000US0468850&-

geo_id=16000US0475940&-geo_id=16000US0477000&-geo_id=NBSP&-

search_results=05000US04019&-search_results=05000US04023&-format=&-_lang=en&-

SubjectID=17498769. Accessed May 27, 2011.
Chapter 6. Literature Cited

804 Draft Environmental Impact Statement for the Rosemont Copper Project

———. 2000e. Population densities. Available at: 

http://factfinder.census.gov/servlet/ThematicMapFramesetServlet?_bm=y&-

PANEL_ID=tm_result&-_MapEvent=displayBy&-

tm_name=DEC_2000_SF1_U_M00090&-ds_name=DEC_2000_SF1_U&-

tm_config=|b=50|l=en|t=809|zf=0.0|ms=thm_def|dw=9.709094003118086|dh=6.0652254661

46513|dt=gov.census.aff.domain.map.EnglishMapExtent|if=gif|cx=-

111.930185|cy=34.168172|zl=8|pz=8|bo=|bl=|ft=350:349:335:389:388:332:331|fl=403:381:2

04:380:369:379:368|g=05000US04019|ds=PEP_2009_EST|sb=89|tud=false|db=060|mn=4|m

x=334|cc=1|cm=1|cn=5|cb=|um=Persons/Sq%20Mile|pr=0|th=PEP_2009_EST_M00090|sf=N

|sg=&-redoLog=false&-errMsg=&-geo_id=04000US04&-_dBy=050&-_sse=on&-_lang=en. 

Accessed May 27, 2011.

———. 2000f. Poverty Thresholds 2000. Available at: 

http://www.census.gov/hhes/www/poverty/data/threshld/thresh00.html. Accessed August 31, 

2011.

———. 2000g. Total population for counties and towns. Available at: 

http://factfinder.census.gov/servlet/DTTable?_bm=y&-context=dt&-

ds_name=DEC_2000_SF3_U&-CONTEXT=dt&-mt_name=DEC_2000_SF3_U_P001&-

tree_id=403&-redoLog=true&-all_geo_types=N&-geo_id=04000US04&-

geo_id=05000US04003&-geo_id=05000US04019&-geo_id=05000US04023&-

geo_id=16000US0422150&-geo_id=16000US0449640&-geo_id=16000US0460188&-

geo_id=16000US0466820&-geo_id=16000US0468220&-geo_id=16000US0468850&-

geo_id=16000US0475940&-geo_id=16000US0477000&-search_results=01000US&-

format=&-_lang=en&-SubjectID=17497279. Accessed May 26, 2011.

———. 2006. Pima County, Arizona - Selected Housing Characteristics: 2006. Available at: 

http://factfinder.census.gov/servlet/ADPTable?_bm=y&-context=adp&-

qr_name=ACS_2006_EST_G00_DP4&-ds_name=ACS_2006_EST_G00_&-tree_id=306&-

redoLog=true&-_caller=geoselect&-geo_id=05000US04019&-format=&-_lang=en. 

Accessed August 31, 2011.

———. 2008. 2006 to 2008 county vacancy rates: American community survey. Available at: 

http://factfinder.census.gov/servlet/DTTable?_bm=y&-context=dt&-

ds_name=ACS_2008_3YR_G00_&-CONTEXT=dt&-

mt_name=ACS_2008_3YR_G2000_C25004&-tree_id=3308&-redoLog=true&-

all_geo_types=N&-geo_id=05000US04003&-geo_id=05000US04019&-

geo_id=05000US04023&-search_results=01000US&-format=&-_lang=en&-

SubjectID=17555389. Accessed May 26, 2011.

———. 2010a. Population and Housing Occupancy Status: 2010-State-County/County Equivalent. 

Available at: 

http://factfinder2.census.gov/faces/tableservices/jsf/pages/productview.xhtml?pid=DEC_10_

PL_GCTPL2.ST05&prodType=table. Accessed June 6, 2011.

———. 2010b. Population and Housing Occupancy Status: 2010-State-Place and County. Available 

at: 

http://factfinder2.census.gov/faces/tableservices/jsf/pages/productview.xhtml?pid=DEC_10_

SF1_GCTP3.ST05&prodType=table. Accessed June 6, 2011.
Chapter 6. Literature Cited

Draft Environmental Impact Statement for the Rosemont Copper Project 805

———. 2010c. Race and Hispanic or Latino: 2010-State-County/County Equivalent. Available at: 

http://factfinder2.census.gov/faces/tableservices/jsf/pages/productview.xhtml?pid=DEC_10_

SF1_GCTP3.ST05&prodType=table.

U.S. Department of Agriculture Soil Survey Division Staff. 1993. Soil Survey Manual. October.

U.S. Department of Energy, and Bureau of Land Management. 2010. Draft Programmatic 

Environmental Impact Statement for Solar Energy Development in Six Southwestern States. 

Vol. 1. Document No. DES 10-59 DOE/EIS-0403: U.S. Department of Energy and Bureau of 

Land Management. December.

U.S. Department of Homeland Security. 2009. 2008 Yearbook of Immigration Statistics. Washington, 

D.C.: U.S. Department of Homeland Security, Office of Immigration Statistics. August.

U.S. Department of the Interior. 2011a. Payments in Lieu of Taxes county payments and acres. 

Available at: http://www.nbc.gov/pilt/pilt/search.cfm. Accessed March 7, 2011.

———. 2011b. Payments in Lieu of Taxes Program summary. Available at: 

http://www.doi.gov/pilt/summary.html. Accessed March 7, 2011.

U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. 1974. Information on Levels of Environmental Noise

Requisite to Protect Public Health and Welfare with an Adequate Margin of Safety. 550/9-

74-004. Washington, D.C.: Office of Noise Abatement and Control. March.

———. 1994. Background for NEPA Reviewers: Non-coal Mining Operations. EPA/530//R-95/043, 

NTIS/PB96/109/103. Washington D.C.: Office of Solid Waste, Special Waste Branch, 

U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. December.

———. 1995. Sand and Gravel Processing. Available at: http://www.epa.gov/ttnchie1/ap42/. 

Accessed September 1, 2011.

———. 2003. Guidance for Estimating Natural Visibility Conditions Under the Regional Haze Rule. 

EPA-454/B-03-005. Research Triangle Park, North Carolina: U.S. Environmental Protection 

Agency, Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards. September.

———. 2004. User's Guide for the AMS/EPA Regulatory Model, AERMOD. EPA-454/B-03-001. 

Research Triangle Park, North Carolina: U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Office of 

Air Quality Planning and Standards.

———. 2006. Unpaved Roads. Available at: http://www.epa.gov/ttnchie1/ap42/. Accessed 

September 1.

———. 2011. Nitrogen dioxide health effects. Available at: 

http://www.epa.gov/oaqps001/nitrogenoxides/health.html. Accessed May 14, 2011.

U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. 1990. Ocelot Recovery Plan (Leopardus pardalis) Draft First 

Revision. Albuquerque, New Mexico: U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Southwest Region. 

August 22.
Chapter 6. Literature Cited

806 Draft Environmental Impact Statement for the Rosemont Copper Project

———. 1995a. Nongame birds of management concern. Available at: 

http://www.fws.gov/migratorybirds/NewReportsPublications/SpecialTopics/speccon/NGBird

MgmtConcern.html. Accessed July 22, 2010.

———. 1995b. Recovery Plan for the Mexican Spotted Owl (Strix occidentalis lucida). Albuquerque, 

New Mexico: U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. December.

———. 1997. Lesser Long-nosed Bat Recovery Plan. Albuquerque: U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, 

Region 2.

———. 2002. Ocelot. Available at: http://www.fws.gov/southwest/es/arizona/Ocelot.htm. Accessed 

June 29, 2011.

———. 2005a. Cienega Creek Preserve Trip Report, 23 June 2005. Provided to SWCA 

Environmental Consultants by Doug Duncan, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, on June 11, 

2009.

———. 2005b. Endangered and threatened wildlife and plants; Listing Gila Chub as endangered with 

critical habitat; Final Rule. Federal Register 70(211):66664–66721.

———. 2007. Five-Year Review for Pima Pineapple Cactus (Coryphantha scheeri var. 

robustispina). Available at: http://www.fws.gov/southwest/es/arizona/pima.htm. Accessed 

September 12, 2011.

———. 2008a. Biological opinion for the proposed buffelgrass control on the Santa Rita 

Experimental Range (AESO/SE 22410-2008-F-0130). Available at: 

http://www.fws.gov/southwest/es/arizona/Biological.htm. Accessed June 30, 2011.

———. 2008b. Biological opinion on Secure Border Initiative (SBInet) Tucson West Tower Project, 

Ajo, Tucson, Casa Grande, Nogales, and Sonoita Stations Area of Operation, U.S. Border 

Patrol, Tucson Sector, Arizona (AESO/SE 22410-2008-F-0373). Available at: 

http://www.fws.gov/southwest/es/arizona/Biological.htm. Accessed June 30, 2011.

———. 2008c. Endangered and threatened wildlife and plants; 12-month finding on a petition to list 

the Northern Mexican Gartersnake (Thamnophus eques megalops) as threatened or 

endangered with critical habitat; Proposed rule. Federal Register 73(228):71788-71826.

U.S. Forest Service. 1986. Coronado National Forest Land and Resource Management Plan. U.S. 

Forest Service, Southwestern Region.

———. 1990. Chapter 2840 - Reclamation. In Forest Service Manual 2800 - Minerals and Geology. 

WO Amendment 2800-90-1. U.S. Forest Service. Effective June 1, 1990.

———. 1992a. Chapter 2520 - Watershed Protection and Management. In FSM 2500 - Watershed 

and Air Management. R-8 Supplement 2500-92-1. . Available at: 

http://www.fs.fed.us/im/directives/field/r8/fsm/2500/2520.html. Accessed January 5, 2010.

———. 1992b. Chapter 2530 - Water Resource Management. In FSM 2500 - Watershed and Air 

Management. R-8 Supplement 2500-92-1. . Available at: 

http://www.fs.fed.us/im/directives/field/r8/fsm/2500/2530.html. Accessed January 5, 2010.
Chapter 6. Literature Cited

Draft Environmental Impact Statement for the Rosemont Copper Project 807

———. 1994. Chapter 2160 - Hazardous Materials Management. In FSM 2100 - Environmental 

Management. Washington, D.C: U.S. Forest Service National Headquarters. November 10.

———. 1995. Landscape Aesthetics: A Handbook for Scenery Management. Agriculture Handbook 

No. 701. U.S. Forest Service. December.

———. 1996. Rangeland Analysis and Management Training Guide. Denver, Colorado: Rocky 

Mountain Region, U.S. Forest Service. August.

———. 1999. FSH 2509.18: Soil Management Handbook. R3 Supplement No. 2509.18-99-1. 

Albuquerque, New Mexico: U.S. Forest Service. October 20.

———. 2000. Chapter 7150 - Surveying. In FSM 7100 - Engineering Management. Washington, 

D.C.: U.S. Forest Service National Headquarters.

———. 2001. Special areas; roadless area conservation; final rule. Federal Register 66(9):

3244–3273.

———. 2002. Term Grazing Permit—Parts 1, 2, and 3. Multiple allotments.

———. 2003a. Chapter 2380 - Landscape Management. In FSM 2300 - Recreation, Wilderness, and 

Related Resource Management. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Forest Service National 

Headquarters.

———. 2003b. Chapter 5570 - Sales, Grants, and Special Acts. In FSM 5500 - Landownership Title 

Management. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Forest Service National Headquarters.

———. 2004a. Environmental Assessment for the Invasive Exotic Plant Management Program: 

Coronado National Forest; Cochise, Graham, Pima, Pinal, and Santa Cruz Counties in 

Southeastern Arizona; and Hidalgo County in Southwestern New Mexico. U.S. Forest 

Service, Coronado National Forest. September.

———. 2004b. Training Guide for Reclamation Bond Estimation and Administration: For Mineral 

Plans of Operation Authorized and Administered under 36 CFR 228A. Washington, D.C.: 

U.S. Forest Service. April.

———. 2005a. Chapter 2670 - Threatened, Endangered and Sensitive Plants and Animals. In FSM 

2600 - Wildlife, Fish and Sensitive Plant Habitat Management. Washington, D.C.: U.S. 

Forest Service National Headquarters.

———. 2005b. FSM 2200 - Range Management. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Forest Service National 

Headquarters.

———. 2005c. Training Guide for Management of Paleontological Resources. Washington, D.C.: 

U.S. Forest Service National Headquarters.

———. 2006. Chapter 2330 - Publicly Managed Recreation Opportunities. In FSM 2300 -

Recreation, Wilderness, and Related Resource Management. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Forest 

Service National Headquarters.
Chapter 6. Literature Cited

808 Draft Environmental Impact Statement for the Rosemont Copper Project

———. 2007a. Chapter 1480 - Environmental Compliance Program. In FSM 1400 - Controls. 

Washington, D.C.: U.S. Forest Service National Headquarters.

———. 2007b. FSH 2309.12 - Heritage Program Handbook. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Forest Service

National Headquarters. June 4.

———. 2007c. Southwestern Region sensitive plants (9/21/07). Available at: 

http://www.fs.usda.gov/Internet/FSE_DOCUMENTS/fsbdev3_021246.pdf. Accessed May 

27, 2011.

———. 2008a. Chapter 2360 - Heritage Program Management In FSM 2300 - Recreation, 

Wilderness, and Related Resource Management. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Forest Service

National Headquarters. July 25.

———. 2008b. Chapter 2880 - Geologic Resources, Hazards, and Services. In FSM 2800 - Minerals

and Geology. Amendment No. 2800-2008-1. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Forest Service National 

Headquarters. September 25.

———. 2008c. FSH 2309.18 - Trails Management Handbook. Amendment No. 2309.18-2008-4. 

Washington, D.C.: U.S. Forest Service National Headquarters. October 16.

———. 2008d. Memorandum of Understanding between the U.S. Department of Agriculture Forest 

Service and the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service to Promote the Conservation of Migratory 

Birds. Forest Service Agreement No. 08-MU-1113-2400-264.

———. 2008e. National Visitor Use Monitoring Results. Data collected FY 2001 and FY 2007. 

U.S. Forest Service, Region 3, Coronado National Forest. November 2.

———. 2008f. Thurber Allotment Management Plan. Santa Cruz County, Arizona: Coronado 

National Forest, Nogales Ranger District.

———. 2009a. Chapter 1940 - Inventory, Monitoring, and Assessment Activities. In FSM 1900 -

Planning. Washington, D.C.: National Headquarters, Forest Service.

———. 2009b. Chapter 2350 - Trail, River, and Similar Recreation Opportunities. In FSM 2300 -

Recreation, Wilderness, and Related Resource Management. Washington, D.C: U.S. Forest 

Service National Headquarters.

———. 2009c. FSH 7709.59 - Road System Operations and Maintenance Handbook. Amendment 

No. 7709.59-2009-1. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Forest Service National Headquarters. February 

5.

———. 2009d. Scoping Summary Report #1: Extent of Public Participation—Rosemont Copper 

Project, a Proposed Mining Operation in Southern Arizona. Tucson, Arizona: Coronado 

National Forest. August.

———. 2009e. Travel management economic contribution application. Database version 7-30-2009. 

Provided by Susan A. Winter, Economist, Ecosystem Management Coordination, U.S. Forest 

Service. Fort Collins, Colorado.
Chapter 6. Literature Cited

Draft Environmental Impact Statement for the Rosemont Copper Project 809

———. 2009f. Tribal Relations Strategic Plan: Fiscal Years 2010–2013. FS-930. Washington, D.C.: 

U.S. Forest Service. September.

———. 2010a. Chapter 1560 - State, Tribal, County, and Local Agencies; Public and Private 

Organizations. In FSM 1500 - External Relations. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Forest Service

National Headquarters.

———. 2010b. Coronado National Forest Fire Management Plan. Coronado National Forest Sky 

Islands. May 18.

———. 2010c. Coronado National Forest Monitoring and Evaluation Trend Analysis, 1986 to 2009. 

U.S. Forest Service, Coronado National Forest.

———. 2010d. FSM 7700 - Travel Management. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Forest Service National 

Headquarters.

———. 2010e. Soil management. In FSM 2500 - Watershed and Air Management. Amendment No. 

2500-2010-1. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Forest Service National Headquarters. November 23.

———. 2011a. Alternatives Considered but Eliminated from Detailed Study: Rosemont Copper 

Project, a Proposed Mining Operation in Southern Arizona. Tucson, Arizona: Coronado 

National Forest. May.

———. 2011b. Coronado National Forest, March 2011 Rosemont Copper Project Paleontological 

Survey. Diggin' Deep 295:2–3.

———. 2011c. Water body: Coronado National Forest GIS data. Available at: 

http://www.fs.fed.us/r3/gis/cor/water_bodies.htm. Accessed May 18, 2011.

———. n.d. (1985). FSH 1909.17 - Economic and Social Analysis. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Forest 

Service National Headquarters.

———. n.d. (1986). ROS Primer and Field Guide. Available at: 

http://www.fs.fed.us/cdt/carrying_capacity/rosfieldguide/ros_primer_and_field_guide.htm. 

Accessed August 30, 2011.

U.S. Forest Service, National Park Service, and U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. 2010. Federal Land 

Managers' Air Quality Related Values Work Group (FLAG): Phase 1 Report, Revised (2010).

Natural Resource Report NPS/NRPC/NRR 2010/232. Denver, Colorado: National Park 

Service.

U.S. Geological Survey. 2010. USGS 09484580 Barrel Canyon near Sonoita. Available at: 

http://waterdata.usgs.gov/nwis/nwisman/?site_no=09484580&agency_cd=USGS. Accessed 

September 7, 2010.

———. 2011. Surface water monthly statistics for the nation. Available at: 

http://waterdata.usgs.gov/nwis/monthly/?referred_module=sw&site_no=09484550&por_09. 

Accessed May 7, 2011.

U.S. Global Change Research Program. 2009. Climate Literacy: The Essential Principles of Climate 

Sciences. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Global Change Research Program. March.
Chapter 6. Literature Cited

810 Draft Environmental Impact Statement for the Rosemont Copper Project

Ugorets, V. 2011. Technical Review of Tetra Tech Report: Regional Groundwater Flow Model, 

Rosemont Copper Project. Project No. 183101/2300. Tucson, Arizona: SRK Consulting. 

January 13.

Ugorets, V., and L. Cope. 2010. Memorandum: Technical Review of Groundwater Flow Modeling 

Report (M and A, 2010b). Project No. 183101/2000. Prepared for SWCA Environmental 

Consultants and the Coronado National Forest. Tucson, Arizona: SRK Consulting. October 

22.

Ugorets, V., and S. Day. 2010. Technical Memorandum: Technical Review of (Tetra Tech, 2010) 

Geochemical Pit Lake Predictive Model, Rosemont Copper Project. Project No. 183101. 

Prepared for SWCA Environmental Consultants and the Coronado National Forest. Tucson, 

Arizona: SRK Consulting. May 3.

Vector Arizona. 2006. Preliminary trip report and phase 1 sampling and analysis plan. Technical 

Memorandum. Document No. 088/06-05-1400-5.3. Prepared for Augusta Resource 

Corporation. Tucson, Arizona: Vector Arizona. July 26.

Warshall, P. 1995. The Madrean Sky Island Archipelago: A planetary overview. In Biodiversity and 

Management of the Madrean Archipelago: The Sky Islands of Southwestern United States 

and Northwestern Mexico. General Technical Report RM-GTR-264. Tucson, Arizona: U.S. 

Forest Service. July.

West, G. C. 2009. Madera Canyon visitor counts. Written communication from Dr. George C. West, 

Friends of Madera Canyon, Green Valley, Arizona, to Stephen Leslie, Environmental 

Planner, SWCA Environmental Consultants. July 31. 

Western Regional Climate Center. 2009. Santa Rita Experimental Range, Arizona. Available at: 

http://www.wrcc.dri.edu/cgi-bin/cliNORMNCDC2000.pl?azsant. Accessed November 22, 

2010.

WestLand Resources Inc. 2007a. Mine Plan of Operations. Project No. 1049.05.B.700. Prepared for 

Augusta Resource Corporation. Tucson, Arizona: WestLand Resources Inc. July 11.

———. 2007b. Rosemont Project Preliminary Springs Assessment [Issue No. SW-2; Item No. 12].

Project No. 1049.10.770.770. Prepared for U.S. Forest Service, Coronado National Forest. 

Tucson, Arizona: WestLand Resources, Inc. December 3.

———. 2009a. 2008 Ranid Survey of the Rosemont Holdings and Vicinity. Project No. 

1049.10.350.350B. Prepared for Rosemont Copper Company. Tucson, Arizona: WestLand 

Resources, Inc. April 24.

———. 2009b. 2009 Ranid Survey of the Rosemont Holdings and Vicinity. Project No. 1049.14 

CCO2 350A. Prepared for Rosemont Copper Company. Tucson, Arizona: WestLand 

Resources, Inc. December 21.

———. 2009c. Agave Survey of the Rosemont Holdings and Vicinity. Project No. 1049.10 350 350. 

Prepared for Rosemont Copper Company. Tucson, Arizona: WestLand Resources, Inc. 

March 11.
Chapter 6. Literature Cited

Draft Environmental Impact Statement for the Rosemont Copper Project 811

———. 2009d. Lesser Long-nosed Bat Survey of the Rosemont Holdings and Vicinity. Project 

No. 1049.10 330 330A. Prepared for Rosemont Copper Company. Tucson, Arizona: 

WestLand Resources, Inc. March 11.

———. 2009e. Pima Pineapple Cactus Survey of the Proposed Rosemont Project Waterline 

Alignment. Project No. 1049.10 350 350. Prepared for Rosemont Copper Company. Tucson, 

Arizona: WestLand Resources, Inc. March 11.

———. 2009f. Pima Pineapple Cactus Survey: Proposed Rosemont Project Santa Rita Road 

Waterline. Project No. 1049.14 CCO3 342. Prepared for Rosemont Copper Company. 

Tucson, Arizona: WestLand Resources Inc. December 18.

———. 2009g. Revised Status Report: Talussnail Surveys and Literature Review in the Rosemont 

Project Area and Vicinity. Project No. 1049.14 350 350. Prepared for Rosemont Copper 

Company. Tucson, Arizona: WestLand Resources, Inc. September 17.

———. 2010a. CWA Section 404(B)(1) Alternatives Analysis (SPL-2008-00816-MB). Project 

No. 1049.14. Prepared for Rosemont Copper Company. Tucson, Arizona: WestLand 

Resources, Inc. December.

———. 2010b. Evaluation of Seven Forest Sensitive Plant Species. Project No. 1049.21. Prepared 

for Rosemont Copper. Tucson, Arizona: WestLand Resources Inc. November 12.

———. 2010c. Field Surveys for Hexalectris colemanii in Southeastern Arizona, May–June 2010. 

Project No. 1049.14. Prepared for Rosemont Copper Company. Tucson, Arizona: WestLand 

Resources, Inc. July 28.

———. 2010d. Onsite Riparian Habitat Assessment, Rosemont Project. Project No. 1049.14. 

Prepared for Rosemont Copper Company. Tucson, Arizona: WestLand Resources, Inc. April.

———. 2010e. Pima Pineapple Cactus Survey for the Rosemont Mine Southern Utility Line 

Alternative, East of Sahuarita, Pima County, Arizona. Project No. 1049.17 342 342. Prepared 

for Rosemont Copper Company. Tucson, Arizona: WestLand Resources, Inc. August 13.

———. 2010f. Preliminary Jurisdictional Determination for the Rosemont Project, Pima County, 

Arizona. Rev. Project No. 1049.14 800 800. Prepared for U.S. Army Corps of Engineers. 

Tucson, Arizona: WestLand Resources, Inc. October 29.

———. 2010g. Preliminary Jurisdictional Determination: Santa Rita Road Waterline for the 

Rosemont Project Pima County, Arizona. Rev. Project No. 1049.14 CCO3 806. Prepared for 

U.S. Army Corps of Engineers. Tucson, Arizona: WestLand Resources, Inc. October 29.

———. 2010h. Rosemont Copper Project Corps Onsite Alternatives. Project No. 1049.14 800 800. 

Prepared for U.S. Army Corps of Engineers. Tucson, Arizona: WestLand Resources Inc. 

April 29.

———. 2011a. Offsite Riparian Habitat Analysis and Mapping. Project No. 1049.14. Prepared for 

Rosemont Copper Company. Tucson, Arizona: WestLand Resources Inc. August 17.
Chapter 6. Literature Cited

812 Draft Environmental Impact Statement for the Rosemont Copper Project

———. 2011b. Preliminary Report of Forest Sensitive Plant Surveys on the Rosemont Holdings 

Focusing on Amoreuxia gonzalezii. Project No. 1049.24. Prepared for Rosemont Copper. 

Tucson, Arizona: WestLand Resources Inc. August 18.

———. 2011c. Rosemont Copper Project: July 2011 Seeps and Springs Survey. Project No. 1049.14. 

Prepared for Rosemont Copper Company. Tucson, Arizona: WestLand Resources Inc. 

August 19.

———. 2011d. Rosemont Project: Effects of Surface Water and Groundwater Diversion on Offsite 

Riparian Habitats in Davidson Canyon. Project No. 1049.14. Prepared for Rosemont Copper 

Company. Tucson, Arizona: WestLand Resources Inc. August 19.

Wheat Scharf Associates. 2003. Corridor Management Plan for the Patagonia-Sonoita Scenic Road. 

Submitted to the Arizona Department of Transportation Intermodal Transportation Division 

Transportation Enhancement/Scenic Roads Section. Tucson, Arizona: Wheat Scharf 

Associates. January.

Wheat Scharf Associates and ADOT/FHWA/BLM/USFS Steering Committee. 2008. Arizona 

Department of Transportation Guidelines for Highways on Bureau of Land Management and 

U.S. Forest Service Lands. Prepared for Arizona Department of Transportation, Federal 

Highway Administration, Bureau of Land Management, and U.S. Forest Service. Tucson, 

Arizona: Wheat Scharf Associates.

Winthers, E., D. Fallon, J. Haglund, T. DeMeo, G. Nowacki, D. Tart, M. Ferwerda, G. Robertson, 

A. Gallegos, A. Rorick, D.T. Cleland, and W. Robbie. 2005. Terrestrial Ecological Unit 

Inventory Technical Guide. Gen Tech Report WO-68. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of 

Agriculture, Forest Service, Washington Office, Ecosystem Management Coordination Staff. 

September.

Young, S. K., D. B. Dreisinger, R. P. Hackl, and D. G. Dixon (eds.). 1999. Hydrometallurgy of 

Copper. Proceedings of the Copper 99 - Cobre 99 International Conference. Vol. IV. 

Phoenix, Arizona: Chilean Institute of Mining Engineers, The Metallurgical Society of the 

Canadian Institute of Mining, Metallurgy and Petroleum, and The Minerals, Metals and 

Materials Society. October 10-13, Phoenix, Arizona.

Zeller, M. E. 2010a. Rosemont Baseline and Post-mining Conditions—Alternatives Sediment

Delivery. Document No. 122/10-320871. Prepared for Rosemont Copper Company. Tucson, 

Arizona: Tetra Tech. April 9.

———. 2010b. Rosemont Baseline and Post-mining Conditions—Sediment Delivery. Document 

No. 121/10-320828-5.3. Prepared for Rosemont Copper Company. Tucson, Arizona: Tetra 

Tech. April 9.

———. 2011. Predicted Regulatory (100-Yr) Hydrology and Average-Annual Runoff Downstream of 

the Rosemont Copper Project. Tucson, Arizona: Tetra Tech. July 11.
Chapter 6. Literature Cited

Draft Environmental Impact Statement for the Rosemont Copper Project 813