alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
---

Exhibit 99.13

March 31, 2015

CONSENT OF CHRISTOPHER JACOBS

United States Securities and Exchange Commission

In connection with Silver Wheaton Corp.s (the Company)
Annual Report on Form 40-F for the year ended December 31, 2014 (the Annual
Report), I, Christopher Jacobs, CEng MIMMM, Vice President and Mining
Economist, Micon International Ltd., hereby consent to the inclusion in, or
incorporation by reference into, the Annual Report and the Companys
Registration Statement on Form S-8 (File No. 333-128128), Form F-10 (File No.
333-202429) and Form F-3D (File No. 333-194702), of the following:

| | 1. | Technical Report on the Mineral Reserves and Mineral
      Resources of the Salobo Copper-Gold Mine Carajas, Pará State, Brazil,
      dated March 19, 2013.
| | -- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Yours truly,

|/s/ Christopher Jacobs              | 
|----------------------------------- | 
|Christopher Jacobs, CEng MIMMM      | 
|Vice President and Mining Economist | 
|Micon International Ltd.            | 

---
#### § 30.706 How are the maximum fees for professional medical services defined?

For professional medical services, OWCP shall maintain a schedule of maximum allowable fees for procedures performed in a given locality. The schedule shall consist of: An assignment of a Relative Value Unit (RVU) to procedures identified by HCPCS/CPT code which represents the relative skill, effort, risk and time required to perform the procedure, as compared to other procedures of the same general class; an assignment of Geographic Practice Cost Index (GPCI) values which represent the relative work, practice expenses and malpractice expenses relative to other localities throughout the country; and a monetary value assignment (conversion factor) for one unit of value for each coded service.

[84 FR 3055, Feb. 8, 2019]
**Exhibit 23.1**

** **

CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTINGFIRM

 

We consent to the incorporation by reference in RegistrationStatements (No. 333-128293, 333-152815, and 333-195955) on Form S-8 and in Registration Statements (No. 333-181817 and 333-206663)on Form S-3 of Orchids Paper Products Company of our report dated March 15, 2017, relating to our audits of the consolidated financialstatements, the financial statement schedules and internal control over financial reporting, which appear in the Annual Reporton Form 10-K/A of Orchids Paper Products Company for the year ended December 31, 2016.

 

 

/s/ HoganTaylor LLP

 

Tulsa, Oklahoma

March 15, 2017
I 

114TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 3817 

To amend the Child Nutrition Act of 1966 to clarify the availability and 

appropriateness of training for local food service personnel, and for 

other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

OCTOBER 23, 2015 

Mr. POCAN (for himself and Mr. KATKO) introduced the following bill; which 

was referred to the Committee on Education and the Workforce 

A BILL 

To amend the Child Nutrition Act of 1966 to clarify the 

availability and appropriateness of training for local food 

service personnel, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Improving School Nu5 trition Training Act’’. 

6 SEC. 2. PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT AND TRAINING. 

7 Section 7(g)(2)(B) of the Child Nutrition Act of 1966 

8 (42 U.S.C. 1776(g)(2)(B)) is amended by adding at the 

9 end the following: 


emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 3817 IH

1 ‘‘(iv) AVAILABILITY AND APPRO2 PRIATENESS OF TRAINING.—A training 

3 program carried out under this subpara4 graph shall be— 

5 ‘‘(I) a program scheduled pri6 marily during regular, paid working 

7 hours, and in the event such program 

8 is scheduled outside of such working 

9 hours— 

10 ‘‘(aa) efforts shall be made 

11 to inform food service personnel 

12 of the necessity of such program 

13 to be so scheduled; 

14 ‘‘(bb) compensation shall be 

15 provided to such personnel for at16 tending such program; and 

17 ‘‘(cc) such personnel shall 

18 not be penalized for not being 

19 able to attend such program; and 

20 ‘‘(II) offered in-person whenever 

21 appropriate, and incorporate hands-on 

22 training techniques.’’. 

Æ 


emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with BILLS
Exhibit 99.10





CONSENT OF G. WATTS



I hereby consent to the use of my name in connection with the following reports and documents, which are being filed as exhibits to and incorporated by reference into the annual report on Form 40-F of Silver Wheaton Corp. (the Company) being filed with the United States Securities and Exchange Commission:



1.

The technical report dated March 15, 2007, entitled An Audit of the Mineral Reserves/Resources Tayoltita, Santa Rita and San Antonio as of December 31, 2006 for Silver Wheaton Corp. (the Tayolita Report);



2.

The annual information form of the Company dated as of March 21, 2007 and revised on February 8, 2008, which includes reference to my name in connection with information relating to the Tayoltita Report, and the properties described therein and with regard to information on the San Dimas mines.



February 08, 2008



/s/ G. Watts

G. Watts
EXHIBIT 32


                CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                       AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906
                        OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



         In connection with the Quarterly Report of Realmark Property Investors
Limited Partnership - III (the "Partnership") on Form 10-Q for the period ending
June 30, 2005 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date
hereof (the "Report"), I, Joseph M. Jayson, Individual General Partner and
Principal Financial Officer, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the
best of my knowledge:

        (1)   The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
              or 15(d) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934; and

        (2)   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
              material respects, the financial condition and result of the
              operations of the Partnership.


              August 15, 2005                  /s/ Joseph M. Jayson
              ---------------                  ------------------------------
                    Date                       Joseph M. Jayson,
                                               Individual General Partner and
                                               Principal Financial Officer
Exhibit99(B)

AMERICAN HONDA FINANCE CORPORATIONANNUALCOMPLIANCE CERTIFICATE PURSUANT TO SECTION 3.11(a) OF THE SALE ANDSERVICING AGREEMENT

I, Paul Honda, do hereby certify that Iam the Assistant Vice President, Assistant Secretary and ComplianceOfficer of American Honda Finance Corporation, a California corporation(the ‘‘Company’’), and further certify onbehalf of the Company in its capacity as servicer (the‘‘Servicer’’) under the Sale and ServicingAgreement (the ‘‘Agreement’’) dated as ofApril  1,  2005 among the Servicer, American HondaReceivables Corp., as Seller and Honda Auto Receivables 2005-2 OwnerTrust as follows:

|  |           |                                                                                                                                                                         |
|--|-----------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|  | (i)  | A review of theactivities of the Servicer during the 11-month period ended March 31,2006, and of its performance under the Agreement has been made under mysupervision; |

|  |            |                                                                                                                                                                  |
|--|------------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|  | (ii)  | To the best of myknowledge and information, based upon such review, the Servicer hasfulfilled all its obligations under the Agreement throughout suchperiod; and |

|  |             |                                                                                                                                                                                                                            |
|--|-------------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|  | (iii)  | To the best of myknowledge and information, no event of default nor any event which withthe giving of notice or lapse of time, or both, would become an eventof default under the Agreement, has occurred or iscontinuing. |

This certificate is being delivered to the Trusteepursuant to Section 3.11 of the Sale and Servicing Agreement effectiveApril  1,  2005, which terms and conditions areincorporated in the Agreement.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I havehereunto set my hand this 26th day of May, 2006

|                                                                  |
|------------------------------------------------------------------|
| /s/Paul C. Honda                                                 |
| Paul C.Honda                                                     |
| Assistant Vice President,AssistantSecretary andComplianceOfficer |
|                                                                  |

----
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff—Appellee, v. Melvin G. STEWART, Defendant—Appellant.

No. 05-7869.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: June 28, 2006.

Decided: July 18, 2006.

*288Melvin G. Stewart, Appellant Pro Se. Paul Joseph McNulty, United States Department of Justice, Washington, D.C., for Appellee.

Before KING, SHEDD, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).

PER CURIAM:

Melvin G. Stewart seeks to appeal the district court’s order dismissing as untimely his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (2000) motion. We dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction because a notice of appeal was not timely filed.

When the United States or its officer or agency is a party, the notice of appeal must be filed no more than sixty days after the entry of the district court’s final judgment or order, Fed. R.App. P. 4(a)(1)(B), unless the district court extends the appeal period under Fed. R.App. P. 4(a)(5), or reopens the appeal period under Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(6). This appeal period is “mandatory and jurisdictional.” *Browder v. Dir., Dep’t of Corr.,*434 U.S. 257, 264, 98 S. Ct. 556, 54 L.Ed.2d 521 (1978) (quoting *United States v. Robinson,*361 U.S. 220, 229, 80 S.Ct. 282, 4 L.Ed.2d 259 (1960)). A prisoner’s notice of appeal is deemed filed when submitted to prison officials for mailing in accordance with *Houston v. Lack,*487 U.S. 266, 108 S.Ct. 2379, 101 L.Ed.2d 245 (1988). However, the prisoner must comply with Fed. R.App. P. 4(c)(1) and 28 U.S.C. § 1746 (2000) to benefit from this mailbox rule.

The district court’s judgment was entered on the docket on July 7, 2005. Stewart filed a letter with the district court on November 21, 2005, inquiring about a notice of appeal filed in his case on July 26, 2005. Stewart informed that the notice of appeal was submitted by someone assisting him with his case. The district court, having received nothing prior to this date in Stewart’s case since entry of judgment, filed the letter as a notice of appeal. To the extent the November letter is con*289strued as a notice of appeal, it is clearly untimely. With respect to Stewart’s assertion that a timely notice of appeal was filed in July 2005, we find that remand for further factual findings under *Houston v. Lack*is not warranted. Stewart failed to comply with Fed. R.App. P. 4(c)(1) and 28 U.S.C. § 1746 and does not allege that he delivered the notice of appeal to prison officials for mailing, but rather states that it was submitted by someone assisting him with his case. Accordingly, we find he is not entitled to the benefit of the mailbox rule under *Houston v. Lack.*

Because Stewart has failed to file a timely notice of appeal or to obtain an extension or reopening of the appeal period, we dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*DISMISSED.*
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          AUG-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             SEP-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               NOV-30-1999
<CASH>                                           3,106
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   90,537
<ALLOWANCES>                                    14,368
<INVENTORY>                                     34,033
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                          40,155
<DEPRECIATION>                                  16,810
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 164,971
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0
<BONDS>                                        110,881
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            35
<OTHER-SE>                                      22,453
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   164,971
<SALES>                                         16,010
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                20,697
<CGS>                                            2,934
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   12,808
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 7,234
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               2,866
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    655
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                655
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       655
<EPS-BASIC>                                      .19
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .19


</TABLE>
**Exhibit 99.2**

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

I, Sam Singer, ChiefFinancial Officer of Bio-Reference Laboratories, Inc. (the “Company”), dohereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant toSection 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

(a)                                  theAnnual Report on Form 10-K of the Company for the fiscal year ended October 312002, which this certification accompanies (the “Periodic Report”), fullycomplies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Actof 1934; and

 

(b)                                 basedon my knowledge, the information contained in the Periodic Report fairlypresents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results ofoperations of the Company.

 

Dated: January 21, 2003

 

 
|   | /s/ Sam  Singer                   |   |
|--------|-----------------------------------|--------|
|   | Sam Singer                        |   |
|   | Chief  Financial Officer          |   |
|   | Bio-Reference  Laboratories, Inc. |   |

 

----
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

DAY HIGH

 297

 293

 309

 316

 329

 323

 285

 245

 237

 223

 247

 250

 258

 258

 253

 262

 259

 217

 162

 152

 180

 190

 208

 222

 235

 272

 239

 251

 254

 254

 254

 255

 198

 165

 141

 142

 153

 169

 176

 186

 174

 165

 150

 114

 124

 123

 111

 117

 137

 162

 174

 181

 190

 186

 172

 111

 271

 265

 270

 277

 281

 235

 214

 194

 190

 197

 220

 220

 204

 209

 213

 179

 214

 168

 137

 140

 163

 181

 192

 207

 214

 221

 213

 183

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

FEBRUARY 2019 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: March 1, 2019

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

RIO VISTA ON THE SACRAMENTO RIVER
### §846. Attempt and conspiracy

Any person who attempts or conspires to commit any offense defined in this subchapter shall be subject to the same penalties as those prescribed for the offense, the commission of which was the object of the attempt or conspiracy.

(Pub. L. 91–513, title II, §406, Oct. 27, 1970, 84 Stat. 1265; Pub. L. 100–690, title VI, §6470(a), Nov. 18, 1988, 102 Stat. 4377.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

1988—Pub. L. 100–690 substituted "shall be subject to the same penalties as those prescribed for the offense" for "is punishable by imprisonment or fine or both which may not exceed the maximum punishment prescribed for the offense".

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date

Section effective on first day of seventh calendar month that begins after Oct. 26, 1970, see section 704 of Pub. L. 91–513, set out as a note under section 801 of this title.
### SUBCHAPTER II—MULTINATIONAL FORCE AND OBSERVERS PARTICIPATION
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY HIGH

 0

 0

 0

 0

 6,131

 6,604

 6,458

 7,847

 7,705

 8,845

 8,781

 8,897

 7,729

 9,885

 10,206

 10,997

 11,616

 11,226

 11,129

 11,195

 12,057

 11,597

 12,843

 12,506

 11,761

 11,008

 11,172

 11,174

 11,308

 11,620

 11,727

 0

 0

 0

 0

 1,427

 1,607

 1,858

 2,245

 2,518

 2,712

 2,779

 2,324

 2,500

 2,698

 3,464

 3,552

 3,777

 3,879

 4,433

 4,471

 4,479

 4,672

 4,214

 4,522

 4,227

 4,212

 4,620

 3,905

 4,387

 5,508

 5,598

 0

 0

 0

 0

 3,083

 3,180

 3,722

 4,388

 4,508

 4,702

 4,955

 4,677

 4,845

 5,645

 6,700

 7,110

 7,483

 7,223

 7,317

 7,530

 7,620

 7,834

 7,786

 7,674

 7,245

 7,268

 7,538

 7,587

 7,656

 8,259

 8,671

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

MARCH 2015 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: April 1, 2015

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

PITTSBURG TOP ON THE SACRAMENTO RIVER
### §§611 to 618. Repealed. Pub. L. 91–230, title VI, §662(2), (4), Apr. 13, 1970, 84 Stat. 188

Section 611, Pub. L. 85–926, §1, Sept. 6, 1958, 72 Stat. 1777; Pub. L. 88–164, title III, §301(a)(1)–(3), (b), Oct. 31, 1963, 77 Stat. 294; Pub. L. 90–576, title III, §304, Oct. 16, 1968, 82 Stat. 1096, authorized grants to public or non-profit institutions and enumerated certain uses of the grants.

Section 612, Pub. L. 85–926, §2, Sept. 6, 1958, 72 Stat. 1777; Pub. L. 86–158, title II, §201, Aug. 14, 1959, 73 Stat. 346; Pub. L. 88–164, title III, §301(a)(3), Oct. 31, 1963, 77 Stat. 294, authorized grants to State educational agencies for fellowships.

Section 613, Pub. L. 85–926, §3, Sept. 6, 1958, 72 Stat. 1777; Pub. L. 88–164, title III, §301(a)(4), Oct. 31, 1963, 77 Stat. 294, related to payment of grants.

Section 614, Pub. L. 85–926, §4, Sept. 6, 1958, 72 Stat. 1777, required submission of report to Commissioner, including financial statement.

Section 615, Pub. L. 85–926, §5, Sept. 6, 1958, 72 Stat. 1777; Pub. L. 89–105, §7, Aug. 4, 1965, 79 Stat. 430, defined terms "nonprofit institution", "State educational agency" and "State".

Section 616, Pub. L. 85–926, §6, Sept. 6, 1958, 72 Stat. 1777, authorized delegation of functions.

Section 617, Pub. L. 85–926, §7, Sept. 6, 1958, 72 Stat. 1777; Pub. L. 88–164, title III, §301(a)(4), Oct. 31, 1963, 77 Stat. 294; Pub. L. 89–105, §8, Aug. 4, 1965, 79 Stat. 430; Pub. L. 90–170, §6, Dec. 4, 1967, 81 Stat. 530, authorized appropriations of $19,500,000; $29,500,000; $34,000,000; $37,500,000; and $55,000,000 for fiscal years ending June 30, 1966, 1967, 1968, 1969, and 1970, respectively.

Section 618, Pub. L. 88–164, title III, §302, Oct. 31, 1963, 77 Stat. 295; Pub. L. 89–105, §§4, 5, Aug. 4, 1965, 79 Stat. 429, 430; Pub. L. 90–247, title I, §156, Jan. 2, 1968, 81 Stat. 805, related to research and demonstration projects: authorization of appropriations, installments, advances, or reimbursements, and conditions; advisory committees; panel or experts; compensation and travel expenses; delegation of functions; construction, equipping and operation of facilities; wages of laborers and authority and functions of Secretary of Labor; definition of "construction" and "cost of construction"; and definition of "research and related purposes".

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date of Repeal

Repeal effective July 1, 1971, see section 662 of Pub. L. 91–230.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY ELEVATION

 238.50

 238.37

 238.30

 238.25

 238.16

 238.10

 238.00

 237.85

 237.70

 237.64

 237.53

 237.54

 237.56

 237.57

 238.58

 243.49

 240.13

 239.23

 238.69

 238.44

 238.69

 238.27

 238.27

 239.24

 238.44

 238.18

 238.76

 238.67

 238.25

 238.08

 237.89

 299

 286

 279

 274

 264

 258

 248

 235

 223

 217

 208

 209

 211

 211

 307

 1,031

 488

 378

 318

 293

 318

 276

 276

 379

 293

 266

 326

 316

 274

 256

 239

STORAGE

-53

-13

-7

-5

-10

-6

-10

-13

-12

-6

-9

+1

+2

+0

+96

+724

-543

-110

-60

-25

+25

-42

+0

+103

-86

-27

+60

-10

-42

-18

-17

CHANGE

 165

 160

 156

 159

 104

 79

 104

 78

 80

 76

 87

 16

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 76

 66

 0

 57

 57

 113

 165

 165

 104

 101

 7,411

 7,298

 7,142

 6,989

 6,543

 6,279

 6,081

 5,835

 5,742

 5,621

 5,534

 5,649

 5,698

 5,715

 18,184

 16,211

 12,036

 10,192

 8,463

 7,875

 8,562

 8,116

 10,742

 9,764

 7,678

 6,152

 8,647

 8,106

 6,438

 6,126

 5,814

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

MARCH 2003 RED BLUFF DIVERSION RESERVOIR DAILY OPERATIONS RUN DATE: May 15, 2003

IN LAKE

CANAL

 ACRE-FEET

TOTALS -113 2,168 246,643

ACRE-FEET -113 4,300 489,216

SUMMARY

RELEASE (ACRE-FEET)

TOTAL 493,516

 352

RELEASE

RIVER

CORNING TO SACTO

CANAL

RELEASE C.F.S

TEHAMA

COLUSA

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

CORNING CANAL 0

TEHAMA-COLUSA CANAL 4,300

TO SACTO RIVER 489,216