alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 31.4

CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER

PURSUANT TO

SECTION 302
OF THE

SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Jonathan W. Kim, certify that:



|1. | I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K/A of MagnaChip Semiconductor Corporation;
|-- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|2. | Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such
statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report.
|-- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Dated: May 1, 2017



|                                            
|--------------------------------------------
|/s/ Jonathan W. Kim                         
|Jonathan W. Kim                             
|Chief Financial Officer                     
|(Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY HIGH

 123

 120

 117

 117

 118

 161

 161

 128

 125

 126

 126

 127

 127

 124

 156

 145

 194

 178

 146

 115

 116

 117

 117

 120

 127

 187

 161

 130

 122

 122

 122

 110

 109

 107

 109

 110

 114

 118

 122

 121

 121

 120

 119

 118

 111

 109

 106

 108

 107

 105

 108

 110

 111

 111

 113

 113

 111

 118

 117

 112

 112

 115

 117

 115

 113

 113

 115

 126

 134

 125

 123

 123

 123

 123

 123

 120

 128

 125

 126

 133

 116

 111

 112

 113

 114

 116

 118

 124

 129

 122

 119

 118

 118

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

MAY 2017 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: June 5, 2017

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

PITTSBURG TOP ON THE SACRAMENTO RIVER
#### SYSTEMS DIVISION, INC., Plaintiff-Cross Appellant, v. TEKNEK ELECTRONICS, LTD, and Teknek LLC, Defendants-Appellants.

No. 05-1081, 05-1094.

United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit.

Feb. 7, 2006.

Rehearing En Banc Denied March 16, 2006.

Before MICHEL, Chief Judge, MAYER and BRYSON, Circuit Judges.

Judgment

PER CURIAM:

This CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED:

*AFFIRMED. See*Fed. Cir. R. 36.
§ 345.119 Refunds. ( a ) *In general.* If more than the correct amount of the employer's contribution is paid with respect to any compensation and the overpayment may not be adjusted in accordance with § 345.118 of this part, the amount of the overpayment shall be refunded in accordance with this section.
( b ) *When permitted.* A claim for refund may be made only when the overpayment cannot be adjusted in accordance with the procedure set forth in § 345.118.
( c ) *Form of claim.* A claim for refund shall be directed to the Chief Financial Officer and shall set forth all grounds in detail and all facts alleged in support of the claim, including the amount and date of each payment to the Board of the contribution to the Board, and the period covered by the contribution report on which such contribution was reported.
( d ) *Claim by fiduciary.* If an executor, administrator, guardian, trustee, or receiver files a claim for refund, evidence to establish the legal authority of the fiduciary shall be annexed to the claim filed by such fiduciary under this section.
( e ) *Time limit.* No refund shall be allowed after the expiration of three years from the time the contribution report was required to be filed or two years from the time the contribution was paid, whichever of such periods expires the later, or if no contribution report was filed, two years from the time the contribution was paid.
( f ) *Interest.* Interest shall be payable on any contribution refunded at the overpayment rate provided for in section 6621 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 from the date of the overpayment to a date preceding the date of the refund check by not more than 30 days.
( g ) *Refunds reduced by underpayments.* Any overpayment claimed or a refund under this section shall be reduced by the amount of any amount of any contributions previously assessed under § 345.120 of this part, which has not already been collected.
### §§4831 to 4833. Repealed. Pub. L. 103–382, title III, §365, Oct. 20, 1994, 108 Stat. 3975

Section 4831, Pub. L. 100–297, title III, §3231, Apr. 28, 1988, 102 Stat. 341, established Fund for the Improvement and Reform of Schools and Teaching Board.

Section 4832, Pub. L. 100–297, title III, §3232, Apr. 28, 1988, 102 Stat. 343, related to dissemination and reporting of exemplary projects and required reports.

Section 4833, Pub. L. 100–297, title III, §3233, Apr. 28, 1988, 102 Stat. 343, related to coordination with Fund for the Improvement of Postsecondary Education.
October 11, 1965 

Honorable Robert S. Calvert Opinion No. C-5i3 

Comptroller of Public Accounts 

Austin, Texas Re: If the Unlveralty of 

Houeton were to invite a 

United States employee to 

give a commengement ad.- 

dress, would It be possible to issue a state 

viarrsnt to this Individual 

Dear Mr. Calved: 

as sn honorarium for the 

talk given? 

You have raqueated the opinion of this office on the 

question of: 

“If the University of Houston were,to 

invite a United States government employee 

to give a commencement address, would it be 

possible to lb.aue a state warrant to this 

lndlvldual as an honoraM* for the talk 

given? ” 

Webster’s New International Dlctlonsry, Second Edltlon, defines an “honorarium” as: 

“An honorary payment or reward, usually 

in recognition of gratuitous or professional 

services on which custom or propriety forbids 

any fixed bualneaa price to be set, or for 

which no payment can be enforced at law. . . .” 

Black’s Law Dictionary, Fourth’ EditJon, defln&a an 

“honorarium” as : 

.An honorary or free lft; a gratuitous 

paymeni,‘aa dlatlngulahed from fir- re or compenaatlon 

for service. . . .lr (Emphasis added). 

Section 51 of Article III of the Constitution of Texas 

provides in part that: 

-2462- 
.-. 

Hon. Robert S. Calvert, page 2 (C- 523) 

'The Legislature shall have no power to 

make any grant or authorize the making of any 

grant of public moneys to any individual. . . .' 

As the foregoing definitions of an "honorarium" 

establish such a payment to an individual to be In the nature 

of a gift or a gratuity, we are of the opinion that the Issuance 

of a state warrant for the payment of an "honorarium would(be 

in violation of Section 51 of Article III of the Constitution 

of Texas, which specifically proh~lblta the making of grants, 

gifts or donations of pub110 money to Individuals. 

SUMMARY 

The Issuance of a state warrant for the payment of an "honorarium" to an Individual making 

&commencement address at the University of Houston 

would be in violation of Section 51 of Article III 

of the Constitution of Texas. 

Very truly yours, 

WAGGONER CARR 

Attorney General 

PB:mkh 

APPROVED: 

OPINION COMMITTEE 

W. V. Geppert, Chairman 

Mario Obledo 

Alan Minter 

Ben~Harrlaon 

Harry Gee 

Pat Bailey 

Assistant 

APPROVED FOR TRR ATTORM OENERAL 

BY: T. B. Wri&ht 

-2463-
DATE: TO: FROM:

RE: MAY 7, 2013 DOCKET NO. EERE

-2013-BT

- DET-OOI7 

### Lucas M. Adin 

# ,d
.

# '~I \1) Project Manager 

# (J v

### v~ ') 

### 1 Building Technologies Office Office of En ergy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) U . S. Department of Energy
UL PETITION The U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) notified UL on April 17,2013 , that DOE had rejected UL'5 claim ofconfidentiality for certain sections of its petition. DOE provided UL with seven days to respond to this determination. UL did not file a response with DOE. Acco r dingly, 

### UL's petition is being docketed in its entirety for the public reco r d.
I 

114TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 3999 

To require that the Secretary of Homeland Security certify that refugees 

admitted to the United States from Iraq or Syria are not security 

threats to the United States prior to admission. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

NOVEMBER 16, 2015 

Mr. HUDSON (for himself, Mr. FARENTHOLD, Mr. BILIRAKIS, Mr. WESTMORELAND, Mr. ZINKE, Mr. POMPEO, Mr. CONAWAY, Mr. BLUM, Mr. 

EMMER of Minnesota, Mr. BURGESS, Mr. CULBERSON, Mr. JOYCE, Mrs. 

ELLMERS of North Carolina, Mr. CRAMER, Mr. MULLIN, Mr. BARLETTA, 

Mr. GOWDY, Mr. GIBBS, Mr. LUETKEMEYER, Mr. ZELDIN, Mr. ROSKAM, 

Mr. HOLDING, Mr. LONG, Mr. GROTHMAN, Mr. ROUZER, Mr. JONES, Mr. 

WILLIAMS, Mr. BENISHEK, Mr. LAMALFA, Mr. PALAZZO, Mr. 

FLEISCHMANN, Mr. SMITH of Missouri, Mr. FLORES, Mr. YOHO, Mr. 

LOUDERMILK, and Mr. MCCAUL) introduced the following bill; which was 

referred to the Committee on the Judiciary 

A BILL 

To require that the Secretary of Homeland Security certify 

that refugees admitted to the United States from Iraq 

or Syria are not security threats to the United States 

prior to admission. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 


emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 3999 IH

1 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

2 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘American Security 

3 Against Foreign Enemies Act of 2015’’ or as the ‘‘Amer4 ican SAFE Act of 2015’’. 

5 SEC. 2. REVIEW OF REFUGEES TO IDENTIFY SECURITY 

6 THREATS TO THE UNITED STATES. 

7 (a) CERTIFICATION.—A covered refugee may not be 

8 admitted to the United States until the Secretary of 

9 Homeland Security, in consultation with the Attorney 

10 General, the Director of the Federal Bureau of Investiga11 tion, and the Director of National Intelligence, certifies 

12 to Congress that that covered refugee is not a security 

13 threat to the United States. 

14 (b) FBI BACKGROUND INVESTIGATION.—The Direc15 tor of the Federal Bureau of Investigation shall take all 

16 actions necessary to ensure that each covered refugee re17 ceives a thorough background investigation prior to admis18 sion. A covered refugee may not be admitted until the Di19 rector certifies that that covered refugee has received such 

20 a background investigation. 

21 (c) INSPECTOR GENERAL REVIEW OF CERTIFI22 CATIONS.—The Inspector General of the Department of 

23 Homeland Security shall review 20 percent of all certifi24 cations made under subsection (a) each fiscal year. 


emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with BILLS
3 

•HR 3999 IH

1 (d) COVERED REFUGEE DEFINED.—The term ‘‘cov2 ered refugee’’ means any alien applying for refugee sta3 tus— 

4 (1) who is a national or resident of Iraq; 

5 (2) who is a national or resident of Syria; or 

6 (3) who is present in Iraq or Syria at any time 

7 while the application for refugee status is pending. 

Æ 


emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with BILLS
# Fourth Court of Appeals **San Antonio, Texas**
MEMORANDUM OPINION

N o. 04

- 21

- 00010

- CV

Marcos MORALE S , Appellant

v. EGZ, LLC ,

Appellee
From the County Court , Guadalupe County, Texas Trial Court No. 2020

- CV

- 0298 Honorable Bill Squires , Judge Presiding
PER CURIAM Sitting: Rebeca C. Martinez, Chief Justice Patricia O. Alvarez, Justice Lori I. Valenzuela , Justice
Delivered and Filed: July 7, 2021
APPEAL DISMISSED FOR WANT OF PROSECUTION Appellant’s brief was originally due on April 26, 2021. Appellant w as granted one extension of time, until June 4, 2021. Neither the brief nor a motion for extension of time w as
filed. On June 15, 2021, this court ordered appellant to file, no later than June 28, 2021, his brief and a written response reasonably explaining (1) his failure to timely file the brief, and (2) why appellee is not significantly injured by appellant’s failure to timely file a brief. Our order cautioned appellant that if he failed to file a brief and the written response by June 28, 2021, we would dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 38.8(a); see also T EX

. R. A PP

.04

- 21

- 00010

- CV

- 2

- P. 42.3(c) (allowing involuntary dismissal if appellant fails to comply with court order). Appellant has not responded to our order; therefore, this appeal is dismiss ed for want of prosecution . All pending motions are denied as moot.
PER CURIAM
§ 411.320 What are an EN's responsibilities as a participant in the Ticket to Work program? An EN must— ( a ) Enter into an agreement with us.
( b ) Serve a prescribed service area. The EN must designate the geographic area in which it will provide services. This will be designated in the EN's agreement with us.
( c ) Provide services directly, or enter into agreements with other entities to provide employment services, vocational rehabilitation services, or other support services to beneficiaries with tickets.
( d ) Ensure that employment services, vocational rehabilitation services, and other support services provided under the Ticket to Work program are provided under appropriate individual work plans (IWPs).
( e ) Elect a payment system at the time of signing an agreement with us (see § 411.505).
( f ) Develop and implement each IWP in partnership with each beneficiary receiving services in a manner that affords the beneficiary the opportunity to exercise informed choice in selecting an employment goal and specific services needed to achieve that employment goal. Each IWP must meet the requirements described in § 411.465.
§ 408.808 What happens to your SVB payments if you begin receiving additional benefit income? ( a ) *Suspension effective date.* We will suspend your SVB payments for any month your other benefit income (as described in § 408.220(a)) exceeds the maximum SVB amount payable for a month (see § 408.505(a)).
( b ) *Resumption of payments.* If otherwise payable, we will resume your SVB payments effective with the first month your other benefit income is less than the maximum SVB amount payable for a month.
### SUBCHAPTER III—ADMINISTRATIVE AND GENERAL PROVISIONS
```

[Congressional Bills 114th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 3877 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

114th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 3877

To amend title 23, United States Code, with respect to the territorial 
                highway program, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            November 2, 2015

 Mr. Sablan (for himself and Mrs. Radewagen) introduced the following 
    bill; which was referred to the Committee on Transportation and 
                             Infrastructure

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To amend title 23, United States Code, with respect to the territorial 
                highway program, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. TERRITORIAL HIGHWAY PROGRAM.

    Section 165(c) of title 23, United States Code, is amended by 
adding at the end the following:
            ``(8) Division of funds between territories.--In carrying 
        out this subsection, the Secretary shall allocate the funds 
        made available to the territories each fiscal year among the 
        territories according to quantifiable measures that are 
        indicative of the surface transportation requirements of each 
        of the territories, which may include the use of population, 
        land area, roadway mileage, or another measure determined 
        appropriate by the Secretary.''.
                                 <all>
```
#### Andrew Q. Brodsky et al., Doing Business as Brodsky, Deutsch *&*Company, Respondents, v. Bernard R. Lieberman, Appellant, et al., Defendants.

No opinion. Present — Martin, P. J., Townley, Untermyer, Dore and Callahan, JJ.
###### Editorial Note on Part 416

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 416 appear at 68 FR 53509, Sept. 11, 2003.

#### § 416.1120 What is unearned income.

Unearned income is all income that is not earned income. We describe some of the types of unearned income in § 416.1121. We consider all of these items as unearned income, whether you receive them in cash or in kind.
### SUBCHAPTER V—AUTHORITIES AND REQUIREMENTS RELATED TO EXPANDED SANCTIONS

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

This subchapter was enacted as part of the Otto Warmbier North Korea Nuclear Sanctions and Enforcement Act of 2019, and also as part of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2020, and not as part of the North Korea Sanctions and Policy Enhancement Act of 2016 which comprises this chapter.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA

DA 20-0518

IN RE THE MARRIAGE OF:

THERESA CARBAH,

 Petitioner and Appellee,

 and

CHRISTOPHER CARBAH,

 Respondent and Appellant.

ORDER OF MEDIATOR APPOINTMENT

This appeal being subject to M.R.App.P. 7, and the parties having failed to jointly 

and timely select a mediator under M.R.App.P., 7(4),(c),

IT IS ORDERED THAT Dana Charles Christian, whose name appears next on 

the list of attorneys desiring appointment as mediators for Domestic Relations appeals 

which is maintained pursuant to M.R.App.P., 7(4)(e), is hereby appointed to conduct the 

mediation process required by M.R.App.P., 7(5), and 

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the time periods set forth in M.R.App.P., 

7(5)(d) shall run from the date of this order of appointment.

A true copy of this order is being mailed to counsel of record for the parties, or to 

the parties individually if not represented by counsel, on the date hereof.

DATED this November 16, 2020.

Bowen Greenwood, Clerk of the Supreme Court

c: Karl Knuchel, Kirsten Mull Core

11/16/2020

Case Number: DA 20-0518
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY

 61,464

 61,368

 61,447

 61,269

 61,028

 60,887

 60,684

 60,387

 60,122

 59,994

 59,579

 59,353

 59,250

 59,418

 59,657

 59,690

 59,825

 59,854

 59,312

 58,711

 58,075

 57,338

 56,877

 56,647

 56,373

 56,128

 55,896

 55,647

 55,383

 55,096

 54,802

 97,147

 96,839

 96,295

 96,030

 95,759

 95,452

 95,189

 94,932

 94,670

 94,230

 94,067

 93,685

 93,183

 92,372

 91,557

 90,934

 90,187

 89,547

 89,443

 89,381

 89,367

 89,360

 89,172

 88,715

 88,383

 87,989

 87,610

 87,232

 86,834

 86,443

 86,074

STORAGE - A.F. 

 158,611

 158,207

 157,742

 157,299

 156,787

 156,339

 155,873

 155,319

 154,792

 154,224

 153,646

 153,038

 152,433

 151,790

 151,214

 150,624

 150,012

 149,401

 148,755

 148,092

 147,442

 146,698

 146,049

 145,362

 144,756

 144,117

 143,506

 142,879

 142,217

 141,539

 140,876

962

1,059

1,091

1,070

1,278

1,143

1,115

1,216

1,101

1,015

1,156

1,007

951

597

895

1,010

1,023

899

886

803

828

1,047

1,026

1,115

929

1,065

1,007

1,039

909

1,341

1,389

793

855

857

847

1,020

917

880

937

835

729

865

700

646

273

605

713

714

591

560

469

500

672

699

769

623

743

699

723

575

999

1,055

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

AUGUST 2005 FULL NATURAL FLOW AT NEW MELONES DAM RUN DATE: 03/07/2006

TOTALS -18,071 22,863

* October 1, 45,349

 1,524.7

 1,526.4

 1,528.1

 1,529.8

 1,531.8

 1,533.6

 1,535.4

 1,537.2

 1,538.9

 1,540.3

 1,542.0

 1,543.4

 1,544.7

 1,545.2

 1,546.4

 1,547.9

 1,549.3

 1,550.5

 1,551.6

 1,552.5

 1,553.5

 1,554.8

 1,556.2

 1,557.7

 1,559.0

 1,560.4

 1,561.8

 1,563.3

 1,564.4

 1,566.4

 1,568.5

DONNELLS

RES

BEARDSLEY

RES

2004 TO DATE

NEW

MELONES

INFLOW

C.F.S

NATURAL

RIVER

C.F.S

ACCUM *

FULL

NATURAL

1000 A.F.

RESERVOIR

TOTAL

-336

-404

-465

-443

-512

-448

-466

-554

-527

-568

-578

-608

-605

-643

-576

-590

-612

-611

-646

-663

-650

-744

-649

-687

-606

-639

-611

-627

-662

-678

-663

CHANGE

A.F. C.F.S.

-169

-204

-234

-223

-258

-226

-235

-279

-266

-286

-291

-307

-305

-324

-290

-297

-309

-308

-326

-334

-328

-375

-327

-346

-306

-322

-308

-316

-334

-342

-334
#### § 411.235 What qualifications are required of a PM?

A PM must have expertise and experience in the field of vocational rehabilitation or employment services.
```

[Congressional Bills 114th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 4123 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

114th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 4123

   To withhold United States contributions to the regularly assessed 
biennial budget of the United Nations until the United Nations adopts a 
definition of ``international terrorism'' concurrent with United States 
                     laws, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           November 19, 2015

  Mr. Walker introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                      Committee on Foreign Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
   To withhold United States contributions to the regularly assessed 
biennial budget of the United Nations until the United Nations adopts a 
definition of ``international terrorism'' concurrent with United States 
                     laws, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Define it to Fight it Act of 2015''.

SEC. 2. WITHHOLDING OF FUNDS.

    (a) In General.--Notwithstanding any other provision of law, the 
Secretary of State shall withhold ten percent of United States 
contributions to the regularly assessed biennial budget of the United 
Nations until such time as the United Nations adopts a definition of 
``international terrorism'' that is concurrent with United States laws.
    (b) Use of Funds.--Contributions withheld pursuant to subsection 
(a) shall be returned to the general fund of the Treasury to be used 
for debt reduction purposes.
    (c) Definitions.--
            (1) International terrorism.--The term ``international 
        terrorism'' means terrorism involving--
                    (A) one or more citizens of a country, or
                    (B) the territory of one or more countries,
        if the government of any such country consents to, or with 
        knowledge, allows, tolerates, or disregards the activities of 
        any such citizen or such use of the territory of any such 
        country, including using such territory as a transit point.
            (2) Terrorism.--The term ``terrorism'' means premeditated, 
        politically motivated violence perpetrated against noncombatant 
        targets by an individual, subnational group, or clandestine 
        agent, and includes activities relating to terrorism, including 
        training, fund-raising, financing, or recruitment.
            (3) Territory.--The term ``territory'' means the land, 
        water, or airspace of a country.
                                 <all>
```