alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[113th Congress Public Law 189]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]

[[Page 128 STAT. 2027]]

Public Law 113-189
113th Congress

                                 An Act

 
To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located at 
  35 Park Street in Danville, Vermont, as the ``Thaddeus Stevens Post 
             Office''. <<NOTE: Nov. 26, 2014 -  [S. 885]>> 

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,
SECTION 1. THADDEUS STEVENS POST OFFICE.

    (a) Designation.--The facility of the United States Postal Service 
located at 35 Park Street in Danville, Vermont, shall be known and 
designated as the ``Thaddeus Stevens Post Office''.
    (b) References.--Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, 
paper, or other record of the United States to the facility referred to 
in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``Thaddeus 
Stevens Post Office''.

    Approved November 26, 2014.

LEGISLATIVE HISTORY--S. 885 (H.R. 1865):
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

CONGRESSIONAL RECORD:
                                                        Vol. 159 (2013):
                                    Aug. 1, considered and passed 
                                        Senate.
                                                        Vol. 160 (2014):
                                    Nov. 17, considered and passed 
                                        House.

                                  <all>
```
Exhibit 99.1


                              OFFICER'S CERTIFICATE
                    REGARDING ANNUAL STATEMENT OF COMPLIANCE

New Century Home Equity Loan Trust, Series 2005-2
2005-2 Asset-Backed Notes

            I, Kevin Cloyd, hereby certify that I am a duly appointed Executive
Vice President of New Century Mortgage Corporation (the "Company"), and further
certify as follows:

            1. This certification is being made pursuant to the terms of the
Servicing Agreement, dated as of April 22, 2005 (the "Servicing Agreement"),
among New Century Home Equity Loan Trust 2005-2, as issuer, the Company, as
master servicer and Deutsche Bank National Trust Company, as indenture trustee.

            2. I have reviewed the activities of the Company during the
preceding year and the Company's performance under the Servicing Agreement and
to the best of my knowledge, based on such review, the Company has fulfilled all
of its obligations under the Servicing Agreement throughout the year.

            Capitalized terms not otherwise defined herein have the meanings set
forth in the Servicing Agreement.


Dated: March 15, 2006
<PAGE>

            IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has executed this Certificate as
of March 15, 2006.


                                             By: /s/ Kevin Cloyd
                                                 -------------------------------
                                             Name:  Kevin Cloyd
                                             Title: Executive Vice President

            I, Joseph Tortorelli, an Assistant Secretary of the Company, hereby
certify that Kevin Cloyd is a duly elected, qualified, and acting Executive Vice
President of the Company and that the signature appearing above is his genuine
signature.

            IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has executed this Certificate as
of March 15, 2006.

                                             By: /s/ Joseph Tortorelli
                                                 -------------------------------
                                             Name:  Joseph Tortorelli
                                             Title: Assistant Secretary
```

[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 74 (Monday, April 18, 2011)]
[Notices]
[Pages 21748-21749]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2011-9240]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention

Disease, Disability, and Injury Prevention and Control Special 
Emphasis Panel (SEP): Initial Review

    The meeting announced below concerns Conducting Public Health 
Research in Kenya, Request for Application (RFA) GH10-003, Panel B, 
initial review.
    In accordance with Section 10(a)(2) of the Federal Advisory 
Committee Act (Pub. L. 92-463), the Centers for Disease Control and 
Prevention (CDC) announces the aforementioned meeting:

    Time and Date: 12 p.m.-4 p.m., June 23, 2011 (Closed).
    Place: Teleconference.
    Status: The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance 
with provisions set forth in Section 552b(c)(4) and (6), Title 5 
U.S.C., and the Determination of the Director, Management Analysis 
and Services Office, CDC, pursuant to Public Law 92-463.
    Matters To Be Discussed: The meeting will include the initial 
review, discussion, and evaluation of applications received in 
response to ``Conducting Public Health Research in Kenya, RFA GH10-
003, Panel B, initial review.''
    Contact Person for More Information: Lata Kumar, M.B.A., M.P.H., 
Scientific Review Officer, Center of Global Health Science Office, 
Center for Global Health, CDC, 1600

[[Page 21749]]

Clifton Road, NE., Mailstop D69, Atlanta, Georgia 30333, Telephone: 
(404) 553-8311.
    The Director, Management Analysis and Services Office, has been 
delegated the authority to sign Federal Register notices pertaining 
to announcements of meetings and other committee management 
activities, for both the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, 
and the Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry.

    Dated: April 11, 2011.
Elaine L. Baker,
Director, Management Analysis and Services Office, Centers for Disease 
Control and Prevention.
[FR Doc. 2011-9240 Filed 4-15-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4163-18-P
```
§ 216.53 What is required for payment. An eligible spouse or divorced spouse must: ( a ) Apply to be entitled to an annuity; and
( b ) Give up the right to return to work for a railroad employer.
(Approved by the Office of Management and Budget under control number 3220-0016 and 3220-0042)
§ 332.2 General considerations. ( a ) *Classes of service covered.* Conditions under which remuneration with respect to a day may not be payable to or accrue to an employee solely because of the application to him of a mileage or work restriction exist in train-and-engine service, yard service, dining-car service, sleeping-car service, and other Pullman-car service, and similar service, and express service on trains. In the determination of a claim for benefits of an employee in any other service, the employee's lack of remuneration with respect to any claimed day shall be presumed not to be due solely to the application of a mileage or work restriction. Conditions under which remuneration with respect to a day may not be payable to or accrue to an employee solely because he is standing by for or laying over between regularly assigned trips or tours of duty exist in train-and-engine service, dining-car service, sleeping-car service, and other Pullman-car service, and similar service, and express service on trains. In the determination of a claim for benefits of an employee in any other service, the employee's lack of remuneration with respect to any claimed day shall be presumed not to be due solely to his standing by for or laying over between regularly assigned trips or tours of duty.
( b ) *Sickness claims.* An employee who, in connection with a claim to a day as a day of sickness, is held to be not able to work because of any physical, mental, psychological, or nervous injury, illness, sickness, or disease shall not be considered to lack remuneration with respect to such day solely because of the application to him of mileage or work restrictions or solely because he is standing by for or laying over between regularly assigned trips or tours of duty. Nor shall a female employee be considered to lack remuneration with respect to a day solely because of the application to her of mileage or work restrictions or solely because she is standing by for or laying over between regularly assigned trips or tours of duty if the day is one on which, because of pregnancy, miscarriage, or the birth of a child, ( 1 ) she is unable to work or
( 2 ) working would be injurious to her health.
[Board Order 59-95, 24 FR 3372, Apr. 30, 1959, as amended at 26 FR 8593, Sept. 14, 1961; Board Order 68-72, 33 FR 11115, Aug. 6, 1968]
### §9841. Repealed. Pub. L. 111–358, title X, §1002(a)(2), Jan. 4, 2011, 124 Stat. 4048

Section, Pub. L. 110–69, title VI, §6131, Aug. 9, 2007, 121 Stat. 640, related to promising practices in K–12 STEM teaching and learning.
EXHIBIT 32.1

                            Certification Pursuant to
                             18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
                             as adopted Pursuant to
                 Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

In connection with the annual report of Feminique Corporation (the "COMPANY") on
Form 10-QSB for the period ended December 31, 2005 as filed with the SEC on the
date hereof (the "REPORT"), I hereby certify, in my capacity as an officer of
the Company, for purposes of 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:

      (1)   The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
            15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      (2)   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
            material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
            of the Company.


                                        /s/ Max Khan
                                        ---------------------------
                                        By: Max Khan
                                        Chief Executive Officer,
                                        Chief Financial Officer
                                        Director
                                        DATE: February 10, 2006


                                       30
§ 771.77 Initial applications. ( a ) The administrative law judge who presides at the hearing on initial applications shall recommend a decision to the Director of Industry Operations. The administrative law judge shall certify the complete record of the proceedings before him and shall immediately forward the complete certified record to the Director of Industry Operations. The administrative law judge shall also send one copy of his recommended decision to the applicant or the applicant's representative, one copy to the Attorney for the Government, and one copy to the Director of Industry Operations, who shall make the initial decision as provided in § 771.107. The applicant may be directed by the Director of Industry Operations to produce such records as may be deemed necessary for examination. All hearings on applications shall be open to the public subject to such restrictions and limitations as may be consistent with orderly procedure.
( b ) If no hearing is requested, the return of the application marked “Disapproved” is the Director of Industry Operations' initial decision.
#### In the Matter of the Accounting of Abraham Offen, as Executor of Michael Offen, Deceased, Appellant-Respondent. Estelle Cohen et al., as Coexecutors of Michael Offen, Deceased, Respondents-Appellants.

No opinion. Present — Martin, P. J., Townley, Untermyer, Dore and Cohn, JJ.
### **CHAPTER 44—JAPAN-UNITED STATES FRIENDSHIP**

Sec.
2901.
Congressional statement of findings and declaration of purpose.
2902.
Japan-United States Friendship Trust Fund.
2903.
Japan-United States Friendship Commission.
2904.
Functions of Commission.
2905.
Administrative powers of Commission.
2906.
Management of the Friendship Trust Fund.
#### § 345.206 Abandonment.

If an employer abandons property or discontinues service but continues to operate as an employer, the employer's individual employer record shall continue to be calculated as provided in this subpart without retroactive adjustment.
#### § 404.1514 When we will purchase existing evidence.

We need specific medical evidence to determine whether you are disabled or blind. You are responsible for providing that evidence. However, we will pay physicians not employed by the Federal government and other non-Federal providers of medical services for the reasonable cost of providing us with existing medical evidence that we need and ask for after November 30, 1980.

[46 FR 45757, Sept. 15, 1981]
#### § 402.5 Scope and purpose.

The rules in this part relate to the availability to the public, pursuant to the Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) 5 U.S.C. 552, of records of the Social Security Administration (SSA). They describe how to make a FOIA request; who can release records and who can decide not to release; how much time it should take to make a determination regarding release; what fees may be charged; what records are available for public inspection; why some records are not released; and your right to appeal and then go to court if we refuse to release records. The rules in this part do not revoke, modify, or supersede the regulations of SSA relating to disclosure of information in part 401 of this chapter.
Electrical Conductivity, UMHOS

Day High Low Mean

1 0 0 0

2 0 0 0

3 0 0 0

4 0 0 0

5 0 0 0

6 0 0 0

7 0 0 0

8 0 0 0

9 0 0 0

10 0 0 0

11 0 0 0

12 0 0 0

13 0 0 0

14 0 0 0

15 0 0 0

16 0 0 0

17 0 0 0

18 0 0 0

19 0 0 0

20 0 0 0

21 0 0 0

22 0 0 0

23 0 0 0

24 0 0 0

25 0 0 0

26 0 0 0

27 0 0 0

28 0 0 0

29 0 0 0

30 0 0 0

31 0 0 0

COMMENT(S):

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

Historical Archive and Report Database

Pittsburg TopOn The Sacramento River

Period: January 2023 Run Date: 2/2/2023
### §§1321, 1322. Omitted

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section 1321, act Apr. 30, 1946, ch. 244, title III, §331, 60 Stat. 151, which provided that certain United States citizens be granted non-quota status, was omitted on authority of section 1291(b)(1) of this title which provided that this subchapter be effective until the expiration of the revised agreement between the United States and the Republic of the Philippines which occurred on July 4, 1974.

Section 1322, act Apr. 30, 1946, ch. 244, title III, §332, 60 Stat. 151, provided for immigration of United States citizens into the Philippines. See note above for section 1321 of this title.
#### Ruth L. Trufant v. Henry G. Williams.

Motion to dismiss appeal granted. Present — Ingraham, P. J., McLaughlin, Laughlin, Clarke and Scott, JJ.
1

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF IDAHO

Docket No. 42943

STATE OF IDAHO,

Plaintiff-Respondent,

v.

MACK J. SNIDER,

Defendant-Appellant.

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

2016 Unpublished Opinion No. 349

Filed: January 27, 2016

Stephen W. Kenyon, Clerk

THIS IS AN UNPUBLISHED

OPINION AND SHALL NOT

BE CITED AS AUTHORITY

Appeal from the District Court of the First Judicial District, State of Idaho, 

Kootenai County. Hon. Fred M. Gibler, District Judge. 

Judgment of conviction and unified sentence of thirteen years, with a minimum 

period of confinement of three years, for possession of methamphetamine with the 

intent to deliver, affirmed.

Sara B. Thomas, State Appellate Public Defender; Erik R. Lehtinen, Deputy 

Appellate Public Defender, Boise, for appellant. 

Hon. Lawrence G. Wasden, Attorney General; Lori A. Fleming, Deputy Attorney 

General, Boise, for respondent. 

________________________________________________

Before GUTIERREZ, Judge; GRATTON, Judge;

and HUSKEY, Judge

________________________________________________

PER CURIAM

Mack J. Snider was found guilty of possession of methamphetamine with the intent to 

deliver, Idaho Code § 37-2732(a)(1)(A). The district court imposed a unified sentence of 

thirteen years, with a minimum period of confinement of three years. Snider appeals, contending 

that his sentence is excessive.

Sentencing is a matter for the trial court’s discretion. Both our standard of review and the 

factors to be considered in evaluating the reasonableness of the sentence are well established and 

need not be repeated here. See State v. Hernandez, 121 Idaho 114, 117-18, 822 P.2d 1011, 1014-
2

15 (Ct. App. 1991); State v. Lopez, 106 Idaho 447, 449-51, 680 P.2d 869, 871-73 (Ct. App. 

1984); State v. Toohill, 103 Idaho 565, 568, 650 P.2d 707, 710 (Ct. App. 1982). When reviewing 

the length of a sentence, we consider the defendant’s entire sentence. State v. Oliver, 144 Idaho 

722, 726, 170 P.3d 387, 391 (2007). Applying these standards, and having reviewed the record 

in this case, we cannot say that the district court abused its discretion.

Therefore, Snider’s judgment of conviction and sentence are affirmed.
485 P.2d 973

#### STATE of New Mexico, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Cecil E. SEXTON, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 9275.

Supreme Court of New Mexico.

June 1, 1971.

Original Proceeding in Certiorari

Ordered that petition for writ of certiorari be and the same is hereby denied.

Further ordered that the record' in Court of Appeals Cause No. 586, 82 N.M. 648, 485 P.2d 982, be and the same is hereby returned to the Clerk of the Court of Appeals.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY ELEV

 978.26

 978.20

 978.12

 977.95

 978.03

 977.95

 978.04

 977.87

 977.75

 977.83

 977.62

 977.69

 977.35

 977.44

 977.26

 977.36

 977.43

 977.50

 977.55

 977.63

 977.39

 977.25

 977.32

 977.16

 976.99

 976.84

 976.95

 976.90

 976.77

 976.64

 976.61

 1,279.8

 1,279.3

 1,278.7

 1,277.2

 1,277.9

 1,277.2

 1,278.0

 1,276.6

 1,275.5

 1,276.2

 1,274.5

 1,275.0

 1,272.2

 1,272.9

 1,271.4

 1,272.3

 1,272.9

 1,273.4

 1,273.9

 1,274.5

 1,272.5

 1,271.3

 1,271.9

 1,270.6

 1,269.2

 1,267.9

 1,268.8

 1,268.4

 1,267.3

 1,266.2

 1,266.0

STORAGE

-0.4

-0.5

-0.7

-1.4

+0.7

-0.7

+0.8

-1.4

-1.0

+0.7

-1.8

+0.6

-2.9

+0.8

-1.5

+0.8

+0.6

+0.6

+0.4

+0.7

-2.0

-1.2

+0.6

-1.3

-1.4

-1.3

+0.9

-0.4

-1.1

-1.1

-0.3

CHANGE

418

257

415

302

388

485

455

404

277

396

304

353

398

443

485

480

359

358

275

398

375

373

361

285

336

378

526

475

476

468

572

INFLOW

 562

 466

 703

 969

 0

 772

 0

 1,061

 722

 0

 1,144

 0

 1,772

 0

 1,157

 14

 3

 2

 9

 0

 1,318

 889

 22

 909

 1,017

 945

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

POWER

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

SPILL

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 613

 962

 962

 668

OUTLET

 68

 46

 52

 54

 49

 52

 73

 63

 63

 57

 49

 57

 65

 62

 90

 43

 60

 60

 54

 60

 73

 76

 43

 54

 38

 65

 62

 73

 62

 54

 30

C.F.S.

 .25

 .17

 .19

 .20

 .18

 .19

 .27

 .23

 .23

 .21

 .18

 .21

 .24

 .23

 .33

 .16

 .22

 .22

 .20

 .22

 .27

 .28

 .16

 .20

 .14

 .24

 .23

 .27

 .23

 .20

 .11

INCHES

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

PRECIP

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

OCTOBER 2003 NEW MELONES LAKE DAILY OPERATIONS RUN DATE: March 12, 2004

IN LAKE

EVAPORATION

INCHES

C.F.S.

COMPUTED*

1000 ACRE-FEET

RELEASE - C.F.S.

TOTALS -14.2 12,275 14,456 0 3,205 1,807 6.66 .00

ACRE-FEET -14,200 24,347 28,673 0 6,357 3,584

COMMENTS:

* COMPUTED INFLOW IS THE SUM OF CHANGE IN STORAGE, RELEASES AND EVAPORATION.

SUMMARY

RELEASE (ACRE-FEET)

POWER 28,673

SPILL 0

OUTLET

TOTAL

 6,357

 35,030

PRECIPITATION

THIS MONTH =

TO DATE =

 .00

JULY 1, 2003 .63

 1,280.3
§ 404.1052 Payments from or to certain tax-exempt trusts or payments under or into certain annuity plans. ( a ) We do not include as wages any payment made— ( 1 ) Into a tax-exempt trust or annuity plan by your employer on behalf of you or your beneficiary; or
( 2 ) From a tax-exempt trust or under an annuity plan to, or on behalf of, you or your beneficiary.
( b ) The trust must be exempt from tax under sections 401 and 501(a) of the Code, and the annuity plan must be a plan described in section 403(a) of the Code when payment is made.
( c ) The exclusion does not apply to payments to an employee of the trust for work done as an employee of the trust.
[55 FR 7310, Mar. 1, 1990]
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

REGINALD CLARENCE HOWARD, 

Plaintiff-Appellant, 

 v. 

HOWARD SKOLNIK, Director (NDOC); 

DWIGHT NEVEN, Warden; ISIDRO 

BACA, Warden; JULIO CALDERIN, 

Chaplain; DWAYNE DEAL, Caseworker; 

AWP J. HENSON, 

Defendants-Appellees.

No. 16-15679 

D.C. No. 2:08-cv-00728-GMNGWF 

MEMORANDUM*

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the District of Nevada

Gloria M. Navarro, Chief Judge, Presiding

April 19, 2018**

Before: TROTT, SILVERMAN and TALLMAN, Circuit Judges. 

Reginald Clarence Howard, a Nevada state prisoner, appeals pro se from the 

district court’s summary judgment in his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action alleging that 

defendants violated his right to the free exercise of religion. We have jurisdiction 

 * This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent 

except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.

** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision 

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

FILED

APR 23 2018

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
2 16-15679 

under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review de novo both summary judgment and an 

officer’s entitlement to qualified immunity. Hughes v. Kisela, 841 F.3d 1081, 

1084 (9th Cir. 2016). We may affirm on any basis supported by the record. 

Hartmann v. California Dept. of Corr. & Rehab., 707 F.3d 1114, 1121 (9th Cir. 

2013). We affirm.

An inmate’s First Amendment right of the free exercise of religion is subject 

to certain limitations. As the Supreme Court said in O’Lone v. Estate of Shabazz, 

482 U.S. 342 (1987), 

[I]ncarceration brings about the necessary withdrawal or 

limitation of many privileges and rights, a retraction 

justified by the considerations underlying our penal 

system. The limitations on the exercise of constitutional 

rights arise both from the fact of incarceration and from 

valid penological objectives including -- deterrence of 

crime, rehabilitation of prisoners, and institutional 

security.

Id. at 348 (citations and quotations omitted).

The unchallenged factual reason for the Nevada Department of Correction’s 

cancellation of Nation of Islam services at High Desert State Prison was 

institutional security. There was no dispute about the legitimacy of this reason 

sufficient to generate a genuine controversy requiring resolution by a trial.

AFFIRMED.