alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 220.181 The month in which the Board will find that the annuitant is no longer disabled. If the evidence shows that the annuitant is no longer disabled, the Board will find that his or her disability ended in the earliest of the following months— ( a ) The month the Board mails the annuitant a notice saying that the Board finds that he or she is no longer disabled based on evidence showing: ( 1 ) There has been medical improvement in the annuitant's impairments related to the ability to work and the annuitant has the capacity to engage in substantial gainful work under the rules set out in §§ 220.177 and 220.178; or
( 2 ) There has been no medical improvement in the annuitant's impairments related to the ability to work but the annuitant has the capacity to engage in substantial gainful work and one of the exceptions to medical improvement set out in § 220.179(a)(1), (2), (3) or (4) applies.
( b ) The month in which the annuitant demonstrated his or her ability to engage in substantial gainful activity (following completion of a trial work period);
( c ) The month in which the annuitant actually does substantical gainful activity where such annuitant is not entitled to a trial work period;
( d ) The month in which the annuitant returns to full-time work, with no significant medical restrictions and acknowledges that medical improvement has occurred, and the Board expected the annuitant's impairment(s) to improve;
( e ) The first month in which the annuitant failed without good cause to do what the Board asked, when the rule set out in paragraph (b)(2) of § 220.179 applies;
( f ) The first month in which the question of continuing disability arose and the Board could not locate the annuitant after a suitable investigation (see § 220.179(b)(3));
( g ) The first month in which the annuitant failed without good cause to follow prescribed treatment, when the rule set out in paragraph (b)(4) of § 220.179 applies; or
( h ) The first month the annuitant was told by his or her physician that he or she could return to work provided there is no substantial conflict between the physician's and the annuitant's statements regarding that annuitant's awareness of his or her capacity for work and the earlier date is supported by the medical evidence.
( i ) The month the evidence shows that the annuitant is no longer disabled under the rules set out in §§ 220.177 through 220.180, and he or she was disabled only for a specified period of time in the past as discussed in § 220.21 or § 220.105;
[56 FR 12980, Mar. 28, 1991, as amended at 74 FR 63603, Dec. 4, 2009]
§ 408.1003 Which administrative actions are initial determinations? Initial determinations regarding SVB include, but are not limited to, determinations about— ( a ) Whether you qualify for SVB;
( b ) Whether you are entitled to receive SVB payments on the basis of your residence outside the United States;
( c ) The amount of your SVB payments;
( d ) Suspension or reduction of your SVB payments;
( e ) Termination of your SVB entitlement;
( f ) Whether an overpayment of benefits must be repaid to us;
( g ) Whether payments will be made, on your behalf, to a representative payee, unless you are legally incompetent;
( h ) Who will act as your payee if we determine that representative payment will be made;
( i ) A claim for benefits under § 408.351 based on alleged misinformation; and
( j ) Our calculation of the amount of change in your federally administered State recognition payment amount (*i.e.,* a reduction, suspension, or termination) which results from a mass change as defined in § 408.1001.
[69 FR 25955, May 10, 2004; 69 FR 45586, July 30, 2004]
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY HIGH

 7,121

 5,931

 5,053

 4,184

 4,776

 3,935

 1,966

 1,601

 2,296

 2,712

 2,761

 2,496

 2,476

 4,596

 6,079

 4,586

 4,034

 5,199

 3,517

 2,664

 3,179

 3,610

 5,341

 8,113

 8,332

 8,550

 9,630

 9,954

 10,454

 10,371

 9,836

 1,290

 927

 843

 691

 691

 578

 533

 473

 427

 395

 372

 352

 338

 345

 385

 506

 379

 427

 471

 435

 408

 454

 585

 633

 1,314

 1,073

 1,251

 1,190

 1,568

 1,479

 1,578

 2,784

 2,220

 2,008

 1,755

 1,876

 1,356

 907

 755

 763

 923

 821

 689

 767

 1,159

 1,708

 1,519

 1,347

 1,578

 1,548

 1,212

 1,119

 1,257

 1,915

 3,200

 3,731

 3,580

 4,054

 4,396

 4,753

 5,006

 5,060

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

OCTOBER 2011 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: November 9, 2011

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

PITTSBURG BOTTOM ON THE SACRAMENTO RIVER
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                                        <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                              3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          AUG-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             SEP-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               NOV-30-1998
<CASH>                                         1691797
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   569159
<ALLOWANCES>                                     12000
<INVENTORY>                                    1342895
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               3675694
<PP&E>                                          553715
<DEPRECIATION>                                  442220
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 5865851
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           209321
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         16468
<OTHER-SE>                                     5640062
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   5865851
<SALES>                                        1009750
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               1009750
<CGS>                                           386662
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   386662
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                517461
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 167994
<INCOME-TAX>                                     45700
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             122294
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    122294
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .07
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .07
        

</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1996
<CASH>                                             988
<SECURITIES>                                        57
<RECEIVABLES>                                    3,790
<ALLOWANCES>                                       161
<INVENTORY>                                        450
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 5,596
<PP&E>                                          47,389
<DEPRECIATION>                                  26,359
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  30,869
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            5,736
<BONDS>                                          7,904
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         1,008
<OTHER-SE>                                      11,488
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    30,869
<SALES>                                             85
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 4,541
<CGS>                                              129
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    2,371
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                   987
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                    56
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 180
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  1,481
<INCOME-TAX>                                       511
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                970
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       970
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .98<F1>
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .97<F2>
<FN>
<F1> REPRESENTS BASIC EPS PREPARED IN ACCORDANCE WITH SFAS NO. 128.
<F2> REPRESENTS DILUTED EPS PREPARED IN ACCORDANCE WITH SFAS NO. 128.
</FN>



</TABLE>
### Part F—General Provisions

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

The letter designation for this Part F was, in the original, Part G. The original Part F of title II of Pub. L. 91–513, consisting of section 601 thereof, is set out as a note under section 801 of this title. The original Part G of title II of Pub. L. 91–513 consisted of sections 701 to 709. Sections 701 to 705 amended and repealed sections in this title and in Title 18, Crimes and Criminal Procedure, and Title 42, The Public Health and Welfare, and enacted provisions set out as notes under sections 321, 801, and 822 of this title. See Tables for classifications of said sections 701 to 705. Sections 706 to 709 of Pub. L. 91–513 are set out as sections 901 to 904 of this title and, for purposes of codification, comprise this Part F.
#### Bluma Nabut, Appellant, v. Harry Nabut, Respondent.

Application to amend a final judgment of divorce by inserting therein a provision for the payment of alimony for the support and maintenance of plaintiff, and for the allowance of counsel fees. Order modified on the facts by increasing from $250 to $500 the counsel fee ordered to be paid to plaintiff, and by striking from the last ordering paragraph of the judgment, as amended by the order, the words and figures “Twenty ($20.00)” and “21st day of April, 1947” and inserting in the place thereof, respectively, the words and figures “ Seventy-five ($75.00) *”*and “ 6th day of September, 1946.” As thus modified, the order, insofar as appealed from, is affirmed, with $10 costs and disbursements to appellant. The counsel fee and the arrears of alimony shall be paid within twenty days from the entry of the order hereon. In our opinion the alimony and counsel fee awarded were inadequate. Hagarty, Acting P. J., Carswell, Johnston, Adel and Sneed, JJ., concur.
#### Farrar & Wheeler *v.*George W. Toliver.

1. Failure or *consideration—proof of extent, necessary.*Where notes are given for the exclusive right to sell machines within a given territory, proof of the sale of two or three machines hy another agent of the payee, under a prior contract, within the same territory, without evidence tending to prove the extent of the injury to the maker of the notes, constitutes no defense to the collection of the notes.

2. *Contract—when new one operates as a bar to suit on first.*Where a party under a contract giving him the exclusive right to sell machines in a specified territory, after finding that another agent is selling in his territory, accepts a new contract for selling in other territory in lieu of the first, this will operate as a satisfaction of any loss sustained under the first one.

Appeal from the Circuit Court of Clay county; the Hon. James C. Allen, Judge, presiding.

*409Messrs. Hitchcock & Finch, for the appellants.

Mr. Justice Dickey

delivered the opinion of the Court:

This is an action, brought by appellants against appellee, upon two promissory notes given to appellants by appellee on July 13, 1874, each for $75, and payable one year from date.

By way of defense, defendant testified that the consideration of the notes was a sale to him of the exclusive right to sell sewing machines, as the agent of appellants, throughout a given territory, stated in the testimony. The contract as to the terms of this agency was reduced to writing on the 18th of July, 1874, and was given in evidence. Defendant then proved, that at the time of giving these notes and making that contract, another man had a like contract from appellants of a former date, embracing a part of the territory mentioned in appellee’s contract, and that that other party notified appellee of the existence of his contract, and also that he sold two or three machines in that territory after the date of appellee’s contract.

The plaintiff proved, that in October, 1874, another agent of appellants applied to the appellee to adjust the difficulty, and thereupon there was executed another contract between appellants and appellee, of that date, of like import of the first, but locating the right to so operate upon other territory. This is the substance of all the evidence.

The issue was tried, by consent, before the court without a jury. The- finding was for defendant, to which appellants excepted.

The judgment must be reversed. The proofs make out no defense. No proof is found tending to show to what extent appellee was injured, if at all, by the sale of the two or three machines mentioned. At the most, he could only claim credit to the amount of his loss by reason of the interference of which he complains. The making of the second contract, it would seem, from the proofs, was accepted in lieu of the first, and *410operated as a satisfaction of the supposed loss, whatever that may have been.

The judgment is reversed, and the cause remanded for a new trial.

*Judgment reversed.*
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY HIGH

 16,744

 16,311

 15,295

 16,348

 15,365

 15,217

 14,913

 14,438

 13,224

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 14,464

 14,620

 15,414

 15,941

 16,074

 16,955

 17,313

 18,836

 17,152

 19,980

 17,129

 14,461

 5,775

 5,701

 5,598

 5,575

 5,815

 6,341

 6,621

 7,175

 8,840

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 8,828

 5,809

 7,965

 5,589

 8,089

 5,677

 7,943

 8,137

 8,083

 8,284

 7,384

 7,916

 10,348

 10,273

 10,294

 10,184

 9,911

 10,059

 10,518

 10,861

 11,768

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 11,534

 10,897

 11,775

 11,187

 11,554

 11,539

 12,059

 12,117

 12,936

 14,081

 11,560

 11,516

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

OCTOBER 2003 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: November 10, 2003

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

PITTSBURG TOP ON THE SACRAMENTO RIVER
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### Centers for Disease Control and Prevention

The meeting announced below concerns Conducting Public Health Research in Kenya, Request for Application (RFA) GH10-003, Panel A, initial review.

In accordance with Section 10(a)(2) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act (Pub. L. 92-463), the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) announces the aforementioned meeting:

*Time and Date:*                         12 p.m.-4 p.m., June 21, 2011 (Closed).                    

*Place:*                         Teleconference.                    

*Status:*                         The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with provisions set forth in Section 552b(c)(4) and (6), Title 5 U.S.C., and the Determination of the Director, Management Analysis and Services Office, CDC, pursuant to Public Law 92-463.                    

*Matters To Be Discussed:*                         The meeting will include the initial review, discussion, and evaluation of applications received in response to “Conducting Public Health Research in Kenya, RFA GH10-003, Panel A, initial review.”                    

*Contact Person for More Information:*                         Lata Kumar, M.B.A., M.P.H., Scientific Review Officer, Center of Global Health Science Office, Center for Global Health, CDC, 1600 Clifton Road, NE., Mailstop D69, Atlanta, Georgia 30333,                         *Telephone:*                         (404) 553-8311.                    

                        The Director, Management Analysis and Services Office, has been delegated the authority to sign                         **Federal Register**                         notices pertaining to announcements of meetings and other committee management activities, for both the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, and the Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry.                    

Dated: April 11, 2011.

Elaine L. Baker,

Director, Management Analysis and Services Office, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

[FR Doc. 2011-9239 Filed 4-15-11; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4163-18-P
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY HIGH

 1,580

 963

 570

 557

 560

 704

 1,169

 1,848

 1,789

 2,048

 2,463

 3,834

 3,969

 3,047

 3,187

 979

 986

 608

 548

 495

 649

 998

 855

 818

 1,584

 420

 456

 329

 323

 296

 279

 229

 232

 233

 233

 233

 233

 233

 233

 234

 234

 235

 240

 252

 252

 263

 254

 249

 246

 240

 240

 239

 238

 236

 231

 231

 233

 236

 233

 233

 235

 234

 473

 373

 305

 309

 276

 276

 333

 429

 458

 498

 689

 1,003

 1,190

 834

 728

 389

 386

 299

 270

 267

 292

 352

 326

 320

 486

 254

 267

 252

 253

 249

 245

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

DECEMBER 2008 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: January 6, 2009

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

RIO VISTA ON THE SACRAMENTO RIVER
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY HIGH

 20,770

 23,281

 23,551

 23,034

 22,376

 22,840

 21,749

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 23,842

 24,957

 24,487

 25,134

 24,073

 23,379

 22,412

 23,103

 23,550

 22,172

 23,334

 24,226

 24,947

 25,509

 26,388

 27,465

 5,801

 7,621

 9,879

 8,968

 9,208

 10,215

 10,194

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 12,455

 12,253

 12,371

 12,372

 12,151

 11,780

 11,311

 11,087

 11,578

 12,543

 13,355

 13,869

 13,803

 14,138

 14,142

 14,222

 13,579

 13,516

 17,077

 15,668

 15,778

 16,781

 16,090

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 18,746

 18,494

 18,614

 18,825

 18,661

 17,578

 17,286

 17,762

 18,559

 18,615

 18,635

 18,279

 18,408

 19,165

 20,006

 20,653

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

DECEMBER 2017 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: January 4, 2018

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

PORT CHICAGO BOTTOM IN SUISUN BAY
[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 76 (Wednesday, April 20, 2011)]
[Notices]
[Page 22081]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2011-9530]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration

RIN 0648-XA380


North Pacific Fishery Management Council; Public Meeting

AGENCY: National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and 
Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), Commerce.

ACTION: Notice of a public meeting of the (CPT).

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The North Pacific Fishery Management Council's (NPFMC) Crab 
Plan Team (CPT) will meet in Juneau, AK.

DATES: The meeting will be held May 9, 2011 through May 13, 2011, from 
9 a.m.-5 p.m.

ADDRESSES: The meeting will be held at the Ted Stevens Marine Research 
Institute, 17109 Point Lena Road, Juneau, AK.
    Council address: North Pacific Fishery Management Council, 605 W. 
4th Avenue, Suite 306, Anchorage, AK 99501-2252.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Diana Stram; telephone: (907) 271-
2809.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Plan Team will discuss: Election of 
officers, catch accounting for groundfish bycatch estimation, criteria 
for establishing time frames for B<INF>MSY</INF> estimation. 
Uncertainty provisions of Annual Catch Limit final rule, Bristol Bay 
Red King Crab (BBRKC) Essential Fish Habitat discussion paper, Draft 
assessment reviews of Snow crab, Tanner crab, BBRKC, Pribilof Island 
Red King Crab, Pribilof Island Blue King Crab, and Saint Matthew Blue 
King Crab. Final assessments (including Overfishing Fishing Limits and 
Acceptable Biological Catch recommendations) for Adak Red King Crab, 
Norton Sound Red King Crab, Aleutian Island Golden King Crab, Tanner 
crab rebuilding alternatives, NPFMC model workshop, Research 
Priorities.
    The Agenda is subject to change, and the latest version will be 
posted at http://www.alaskafisheries.noaa.gov/npfmc/.

Special Accommodations

    These meetings are physically accessible to people with 
disabilities. Requests for sign language interpretation or other 
auxiliary aids should be directed to Gail Bendixen at (907) 271-2809 at 
least 7 working days prior to the meeting date.

    Dated: April 15, 2011.
Tracey L. Thompson,
Acting Director, Office of Sustainable Fisheries, National Marine 
Fisheries Service.
[FR Doc. 2011-9530 Filed 4-19-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-22-P
### §3422. Office of Inspector General

There shall be in the Department an Office of Inspector General, established in accordance with chapter 4 of title 5.

(Pub. L. 96–88, title II, §211, formerly §212, Oct. 17, 1979, 93 Stat. 675; renumbered §211, Pub. L. 103–382, title II, §271(a)(2), Oct. 20, 1994, 108 Stat. 3929; amended Pub. L. 117–286, §4(b)(41), Dec. 27, 2022, 136 Stat. 4348.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Prior Provisions

A prior section 211 of Pub. L. 96–88 was renumbered section 210 and is classified to section 3421 of this title.

#### Amendments

2022—Pub. L. 117–286 substituted "chapter 4 of title 5." for "the Inspector General Act of 1978."