alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

DAY ELEV

 221.59

 220.65

 220.15

 220.40

 219.40

 219.80

 219.04

 219.44

 220.11

 220.25

 221.36

 221.37

 221.73

 222.30

 222.31

 221.44

 220.03

 219.60

 221.10

 221.25

 220.83

 222.38

 223.46

 222.40

 221.57

 221.38

 221.84

 220.73

 221.71

 222.78

 47,309

 44,844

 43,541

 44,192

 41,605

 42,635

 40,686

 41,708

 43,437

 43,801

 46,705

 46,731

 47,677

 49,182

 49,208

 46,915

 43,230

 42,119

 46,023

 46,416

 45,315

 49,394

 52,276

 49,447

 47,257

 46,758

 47,966

 45,054

 47,625

 50,459

STORAGE

+184

-2,465

-1,303

+651

-2,587

+1,030

-1,949

+1,022

+1,729

+364

+2,904

+26

+946

+1,505

+26

-2,293

-3,685

-1,111

+3,904

+393

-1,101

+4,079

+2,882

-2,829

-2,190

-499

+1,208

-2,912

+2,571

+2,834

CHANGE

2,822

2,820

2,818

2,856

2,037

1,412

1,471

1,609

1,863

1,857

1,755

1,558

1,479

1,488

701

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

PUMPING

 5,978

 6,892

 6,658

 5,318

 6,100

 6,090

 6,230

 5,197

 5,510

 4,632

 3,953

 4,376

 3,942

 4,541

 3,912

 3,633

 4,155

 4,809

 4,474

 4,722

 4,549

 3,987

 4,614

 4,868

 5,296

 5,193

 4,467

 4,672

 3,846

 5,015

PUMPING

 0

 0

 0

 244

 855

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

PUMPING

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 449

 688

 899

 906

 1,065

 1,084

 1,201

 1,275

 1,110

 1,248

 1,353

 1,311

 1,272

 1,266

 984

 949

GEN.

*

-246

-197

-17

-81

-138

+24

+32

+59

+304

-7

+156

+88

+88

-117

+240

-250

-249

-289

-60

-254

-256

-138

-43

+33

-362

-66

-255

-488

-165

+164

OR

UNITED STATES 

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION

CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT

CONSOLIDATED STATE-FEDERAL O'NEILL FOREBAY May 22, 2002

DAILY OPERATIONS

APRIL 2002 RUN DATE:

IN LAKE GEN.

ACRE-FEET O'NEILL

RELEASE - C.F.S. 

TOTALS +3,334 28,546 17,060 1,099 147,629 -2,490

ACRE-FEET +3,334 56,621 33,839 2,180 292,822

SUMMARY

 778

RELEASE (ACRE-FEET)

O'NEILL GEN. 33,839

SAN LUIS PUMP 2,180 778

 47,125

DOS AMIGOS PUMP 292,822

DELIVERIES 

S. LUIS O'NEILL

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 884

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 3,253

 3,415

 3,445

 5,444

 7,568

 6,259

 4,964

 6,904

 6,618

 3,900

 5,401

 5,564

 6,480

 4,714

 5,803

 7,303

 87,919

 174,387

CALIF. DOS AMIGOS

AQUEDUCT

3,495

3,026

3,200

3,115

3,751

4,289

3,745

4,043

4,215

2,965

3,505

2,743

2,852

3,929

180

0

0

0

0

0

487

552

601

757

506

754

124

244

487

319

 53,884

 106,879

S. LUIS

DELIV.

GAINS(+)

LOSS(-)

C.F.S.

INFLOW - C.F.S

STATE OF CALIFORNIA

THE RESOURCES AGENCY

DEPARTMENT OF WATER RESOURCES

STATE WATER PROJECT

TOTAL 329,619

-4,939

* DAILY DEL. FIGURES UNAVAILABLE. TOT. DEL. IS INCLUDED IN COMPUTING MONTHLY TOTALS 

Table 18
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5


<S>                                         <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                  12-Mos
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              Oct-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                                 Nov-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                                   Oct-31-1999
<CASH>                                         4,504
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  1,043,205
<ALLOWANCES>                                   189,329
<INVENTORY>                                    0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               879,536
<PP&E>                                         1,222,782
<DEPRECIATION>                                 882,294
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 1,976,855
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          2,213,264
<BONDS>                                        0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       2,002
<OTHER-SE>                                     (1,151,124)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   1,976,855
<SALES>                                        0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               5,253,576
<CGS>                                          0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  5,048,921
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               (239,010)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             350,292
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (384,647)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   (4,403)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (380,244)
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (380,244)
<EPS-BASIC>                                  (0.19)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  (0.19)




</TABLE>
# C_2012064EN.01000602.xml

| 3.3.2012 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 64/6 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

3.3.2012

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 64/6

---

Opinion of the Advisory Committee on restrictive agreements and dominant position given at its meeting of 10 October 2011 regarding a draft decision relating to Case COMP/39.482 (2) — Exotic fruits (bananas)

Rapporteur: Poland

2012/C 64/07

| 1. | The Advisory Committee agrees with the Commission on the basic amount of the fines. |
| --- | --- |

1.

The Advisory Committee agrees with the Commission on the basic amount of the fines.

| 2. | The Advisory Committee agrees with the Commission on the application of a mitigating factor. |
| --- | --- |

2.

The Advisory Committee agrees with the Commission on the application of a mitigating factor.

| 3. | The Advisory Committee agrees with the Commission on the reductions of the fines based on the 2002 Leniency Notice. |
| --- | --- |

3.

The Advisory Committee agrees with the Commission on the reductions of the fines based on the 2002 Leniency Notice.

| 4. | The Advisory Committee agrees with the Commission on the final amounts of the fines. |
| --- | --- |

4.

The Advisory Committee agrees with the Commission on the final amounts of the fines.

| 5. | The Advisory Committee recommends the publication of its opinion in the Official Journal of the European Union. |
| --- | --- |

5.

The Advisory Committee recommends the publication of its opinion in the Official Journal of the European Union.

Official Journal of the European Union.

---
(No. 00026

#### Ruth Mc Cluskey, as wife of Frank S. Mc Cluskey, deceased, Claimant, vs. State of Illinois, Respondent.

*Opinion filed August 16, 1973.*

Ruth Mc Cluskey, Claimant, pro se.

William J. Scott, Attorney General; Saul R. Wexler, Assistant Attorney General, and Vincent Biskupic, Special Assistant Attorney General, for Respondent.

*528Per Curiam.

This claim, arising out of the death of a fireman killed in the line of duty, seeks payment of compensation to the decedent’s beneficiary pursuant to the provisions of the "Law Enforcement Officers and Fireman Compensation Act”, [hereafter, "the Act”] *Ch. 48, Sec. 281, et. seq., Ill.Rev.Stat., 1971.*

The court has carefully considered the application for benefits submitted on the form prescribed and furnished by the Attorney General; a written statement of the decedent’s supervising officer; and a report by the Illinois Attorney General’s office which substantiates matters set forth in the application. Based upon these documents and other evidence submitted at a hearing before the full court on July 12, 1973, the court finds as follows:

1. That the claimant, Ruth McCluskey, is the wife of the decedent and is the beneficiary who was designated by him as stated in her application for benefits.

2. That the decedent, Frank S. McCluskey, was a fireman employed by the Villa Park Fire Department and engaged in the active performance of his duties, within the meaning of Sec. 2(c) of the Act, on October 10, 1970.

3. That on said date, Captain McCluskey collapsed at the scene of an extensive residential fire, while helping his men pull a fire hose line. Two hours were required to contain the blaze and prior to his collapse, Captain McCluskey entered the burning building to assist in directing the firefighting activities. Captain McCluskey was rushed from the scene of the fire to Memorial Hospital of DuPage County, where he remained until October 16, 1970, when he was transferred to Loyola Uni*529versity Hospital, Maywood, Illinois. He underwent heart surgery at Loyola University Hospital from which he never recovered. Captain McCluskey died on October 31, 1970, and the cause of death, as recited in the death certificate, was "acute myocardial infarction”.

4. That Captain McCluskey was killed in the line of duty as defined in Sec. 2(c) of the Act.

5. That the proof submitted in support of this claim satisfies all of the requirements of the Act, and the claim is therefore compensable thereunder.

It Is Hereby Ordered that the sum of $10,000.00 (Ten Thousand Dollars) be awarded to Ruth McCluskey as wife and designated beneficiary of the deceased fireman, Frank S. McCluskey.
### §9706. Studies by the Comptroller General

#### (a) Effectiveness study

Not later than 3 years after December 4, 2003, the Comptroller General of the United States shall submit a report to Congress assessing the effectiveness of the Commission in promoting financial literacy and education.

#### (b) Study and report on the need and means for improving financial literacy among consumers

#### (1) Study required

The Comptroller General of the United States shall conduct a study to assess the extent of consumers' knowledge and awareness of credit reports, credit scores, and the dispute resolution process, and on methods for improving financial literacy among consumers.

#### (2) Factors to be included

The study required under paragraph (1) shall include the following issues:

(A) The number of consumers who view their credit reports.

(B) Under what conditions and for what purposes do consumers primarily obtain a copy of their consumer report (such as for the purpose of ensuring the completeness and accuracy of the contents, to protect against fraud, in response to an adverse action based on the report, or in response to suspected identity theft) and approximately what percentage of the total number of consumers who obtain a copy of their consumer report do so for each such primary purpose.

(C) The extent of consumers' knowledge of the data collection process.

(D) The extent to which consumers know how to get a copy of a consumer report.

(E) The extent to which consumers know and understand the factors that positively or negatively impact credit scores.

#### (3) Report required

Before the end of the 12-month period beginning on December 4, 2003, the Comptroller General shall submit a report to Congress on the findings and conclusions of the Comptroller General pursuant to the study conducted under this subsection, together with such recommendations for legislative or administrative action as the Comptroller General may determine to be appropriate, including recommendations on methods for improving financial literacy among consumers.

(Pub. L. 108–159, title V, §517, Dec. 4, 2003, 117 Stat. 2008.)

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date

Section subject to joint regulations establishing effective dates as prescribed by Federal Reserve Board and Federal Trade Commission, except as otherwise provided, see section 3 of Pub. L. 108–159, set out as an Effective Date of 2003 Amendment note under section 1681 of Title 15, Commerce and Trade.

#### Definitions

For definitions of terms used in this section, see section 2 of Pub. L. 108–159, set out as a note under section 1681 of Title 15, Commerce and Trade.
§ 404.527 Additional methods for recovery of title II benefit overpayments. ( a ) *General.* In addition to the methods specified in §§ 404.502 and 404.520, an overpayment under title II of the Act is also subject to recovery under the rules in subparts D and E of part 422 of this chapter. Subpart D of part 422 of this chapter applies only under the following conditions: ( 1 ) The overpayment occurred after the individual has attained age 18;
( 2 ) The overpaid individual is no longer entitled to benefits under title II of the Act; and
( 3 ) Pursuant to paragraph (b) of this section, we have determined that the overpayment is otherwise unrecoverable under section 204 of the Act.
( b ) *When an overpayment is considered to be otherwise unrecoverable.* An overpayment under title II of the Act is considered to be otherwise unrecoverable under section 204 of the Act if all of the following conditions are met: ( 1 ) Our billing system sequence has been completed (*i.e.*, we have sent the individual an initial notice of the overpayment, a reminder notice, and a past-due notice) or collection activity has been suspended or terminated in accordance with the Federal Claims Collection Standards in 31 CFR 903.2 or 903.3.
( 2 ) We have not entered into an installment payment arrangement with the overpaid individual or, if we have entered into such an arrangement, the overpaid individual has failed to make any payment for two consecutive months.
( 3 ) The overpaid individual has not requested waiver pursuant to § 404.506 or § 404.522 or, after a review conducted pursuant to those sections, we have determined that we will not waive collection of the overpayment.
( 4 ) The overpaid individual has not requested reconsideration of the initial overpayment determination pursuant to §§ 404.907 and 404.909 or, after a review conducted pursuant to § 404.913, we have affirmed, in whole or in part, the initial overpayment determination.
( 5 ) The overpayment cannot be recovered pursuant to § 404.502 by adjustment of benefits payable to any individual other than the overpaid individual. For purposes of this paragraph, an overpayment will be deemed to be unrecoverable from any individual who was living in a separate household from the overpaid person at the time of the overpayment and did not receive the overpayment.
[62 FR 64278, Dec. 5, 1997, as amended at 68 FR 74183, Dec. 23, 2003]
### §853a. Transferred

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section, Pub. L. 100–690, title V, §5301, Nov. 18, 1988, 102 Stat. 4310, which related to denial of Federal benefits to drug traffickers and possessors, was renumbered section 421 of the Controlled Substances Act by Pub. L. 101–647, title X, §1002(d)(1), Nov. 29, 1990, 104 Stat. 4827, and is classified to section 862 of this title.
### subpart ii—wage and employment practices
FIL ED U.S . C OUR T O F A PPE ALS ELE VEN TH CIRCUI T Aug ust30 , 2 006 THO MAS K. KA

HN CLE RK [DO NOT PUBLISH] IN THE UN ITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FO R T HE EL EV EN TH CIRC UI T

N o. 05- 1551 3 Non-A rgum ent Calendar

D. C. Docket N o. 91-00312-CR-01-RL V- 1 RICH ARD B. SIMMO NS , Pe tit ion er -Appe llant,

ve rs us UNITED STAT ES OF AMERIC A, Respondent -Appellee.

Appeal f rom the United State s District Court for the N orthern District of Ge orgia (A ug us t 30, 200 6) Be fo re T JO FL A T , CA RN E S an d P RY O R, Ci rc uit Jud ge s. PE R CU RIA M: O n F eb ru ar

y 6, 199 2, a ft er

aj ur y ha d f ound appe llant g uil ty

of vio la tin g 21 U. S. C. §§ 84 1(a)( 1) and 846 and 18 U. S. C. § 924 (c) and 922 (a)( 6), the district2

court sentenced him

to term s of im

prisonm ent totaling 322 m onth s. W e af firm ed appellant’ s convictio ns but rem anded the case w ith the ins truction that th e district

co urt m ak e fi ndi ngs of

f ac t a s to w he the r ap pe llant h ad obs tr uc te d j ust ic e so t o

w ar rant the c ourt’ s e nha nc em en t of his of fe nse le ve l un de r the S en te nc ing Gui de li ne s. Un it edSta te s v . Simm on s, 9 F.3d 15 59 (11 th Cir . 19 93 ) (Tab le ). Pu rs ua nt t o th e m an da te , the dis tr ic t c ourt e nte re d a n or de r sta tin g th e fa ct ua l ba sis fo r the obs tr

uc tio n of j ust ic e en ha nc em en t. On June 27, 2005, appellant m oved the dis trict court to “ Correc t [his] Final Judg m en t” pur suant t o F ed

. R. Ci v. P

. 60( b) c ont en din g th at U nit ed S ta te s v. Booker, 543 U. S. 220, 125 S.Ct. 738 (200 5), is r etroactive and should be applied t o h i s c a s e . T h e d i s t r i c tc o u rtd e n i e dh i s mo t i o n o n th e g r o u n dt h a tt h e S up r e me Co urt ha d no t de cl ar ed

B ooke r to b e re tr oa ct ive a nd a ppl ic ab le to ca se s on collateral r eview; thus, B ooker provid es appellant with no basis for relief. See Re co rd , V ol. 2 a t T ab s 12 5 a nd 1 40. Appe llant n owappe al s. W e af fi rm the di st ric t co ur t’s d eci si on on two gro un ds . Firs t, as th e d is tri ct co ur t p ro pe rly hel d, Bo oke r pr ovi de s a

ppe llant n o ba sis f

or r el ie f. S ec ond, appe llant’ s m oti on constitu tes a collatera l attack on his sentences and th eref ore should have beenWe intim ate no view as to whethe r appe llant would have to petition this court for lea ve 1 to file a § 2255 motion beca use the motion would amount to a second or succe ssive motion. 3 brough t under 28 U.S .C. § 2255 , not Rule 60(b). 1 AFFIR MED.
Order entered November 7, 2022

In The 

### Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

No. 05

- 22

- 00826

- CV

THE CITY OF MESQUITE, TEXAS , Appellant

V.

ANTHONY WAGNER , Appellee

On Appeal from the 68th Judicial District Court

Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. DC

- 22

- 02864

O RDER

Before the Court is appellee’s November 3, 2022 unopposed motion for an

extension of time to file his brief. We GRANT the motion and extend the time to

November 23 , 2022

.

/s/ BONNIE LEE GOLDSTEIN JUSTICE
# C_2012072EN.01004301.xml

| 10.3.2012 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 72/43 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

10.3.2012

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 72/43

---

Information from Sweden concerning implementation of Directive 2010/35/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council

2012/C 72/09

Sweden has informed the Commission according to Article 34 of Directive 2010/35/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 16 June 2010 on transportable pressure equipment that Sweden will apply transitional provision 2 of Annex II to Directive 2010/35/EU.

---
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY ELEV

 222.92

 221.89

 220.99

 219.63

 221.81

 219.94

 221.24

 221.11

 220.57

 220.40

 220.00

 220.86

 221.14

 221.86

 221.32

 220.83

 221.29

 221.54

 224.01

 221.30

 223.03

 222.45

 221.64

 220.50

 220.58

 221.50

 219.75

 219.70

 221.48

 221.45

 221.34

 50,833

 48,098

 45,734

 42,196

 47,887

 42,997

 46,390

 46,049

 44,635

 44,192

 43,152

 45,394

 46,128

 48,019

 46,600

 45,315

 46,521

 47,178

 53,754

 46,547

 51,126

 49,580

 47,441

 44,453

 44,661

 47,073

 42,505

 42,376

 47,020

 46,941

 46,653

STORAGE

+1,040

-2,735

-2,364

-3,538

+5,691

-4,890

+3,393

-341

-1,414

-443

-1,040

+2,242

+734

+1,891

-1,419

-1,285

+1,206

+657

+6,576

-7,207

+4,579

-1,546

-2,139

-2,988

+208

+2,412

-4,568

-129

+4,644

-79

-288

CHANGE

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

PUMPING

 2,458

 3,068

 3,056

 4,234

 4,081

 5,697

 3,945

 4,237

 4,656

 4,790

 5,198

 5,440

 6,714

 4,443

 5,175

 4,966

 5,234

 5,386

 4,531

 5,595

 4,319

 5,202

 4,823

 5,302

 5,414

 5,679

 6,344

 5,853

 5,514

 5,105

 5,311

PUMPING

 0

 0

 905

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 482

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 339

 0

 0

 0

PUMPING

 1,077

 1,220

 1,288

 1,123

 1,079

 1,300

 1,553

 1,902

 1,750

 2,274

 2,768

 2,694

 2,609

 2,506

 2,250

 2,021

 1,946

 1,969

 1,903

 1,708

 1,558

 1,658

 1,916

 1,972

 1,880

 1,702

 1,519

 1,517

 1,567

 1,724

 1,631

GEN.

*

-293

+130

+141

-343

-113

-81

-263

-4

-249

-85

-4

-486

-467

+23

-180

+153

-210

-71

-17

-39

-131

-9

-17

-139

-182

-261

-321

-73

-78

+37

+501

OR

UNITED STATES 

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION

CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT

CONSOLIDATED STATE-FEDERAL O'NEILL FOREBAY June 25, 2001

DAILY OPERATIONS

MAY 2001 RUN DATE:

IN LAKE GEN.

ACRE-FEET O'NEILL

RELEASE - C.F.S. 

TOTALS -3,140 0 55,584 1,726 151,770 -3,131

ACRE-FEET -3,140 0 110,251 3,424 301,036

SUMMARY

 1,526

RELEASE (ACRE-FEET)

O'NEILL GEN. 110,251

SAN LUIS PUMP 3,424 1,526

 49,793

DOS AMIGOS PUMP 301,036

DELIVERIES 

S. LUIS O'NEILL

 3,863

 2,501

 3,278

 3,455

 7,335

 4,276

 6,969

 5,505

 5,942

 6,925

 6,951

 9,243

 9,688

 7,461

 6,598

 6,332

 7,949

 7,463

 9,303

 3,264

 7,791

 6,090

 5,677

 5,907

 7,580

 8,858

 5,880

 7,717

 9,501

 6,752

 7,066

 203,120

 402,889

CALIF. DOS AMIGOS

AQUEDUCT

490

278

639

461

808

336

503

466

0

0

495

507

472

418

292

336

49

294

463

445

525

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

 8,277

 16,417

S. LUIS

DELIV.

GAINS(+)

LOSS(-)

C.F.S.

INFLOW - C.F.S

STATE OF CALIFORNIA

THE RESOURCES AGENCY

DEPARTMENT OF WATER RESOURCES

STATE WATER PROJECT

TOTAL 416,237

-6,210

* DAILY DEL. FIGURES UNAVAILABLE. TOT. DEL. IS INCLUDED IN COMPUTING MONTHLY TOTALS 

Table 18
#### § 411.405 When does an agreement between an EN and the State VR agency have to be in place?

Each EN must have an agreement with the State VR agency prior to referring a beneficiary it is serving under the Ticket to Work program to the State VR agency for specific services.