alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
### §1841. Repealed. Pub. L. 87–195, pt. III, §642(a)(2), Sept. 4, 1961, 75 Stat. 460

Section, acts Aug. 26, 1954, ch. 937, ch. II, §131, 68 Stat. 838; July 8, 1955, ch. 301, §4, 69 Stat. 284; July 18, 1956, ch. 627, §4, 70 Stat. 556; Aug. 14, 1957, Pub. L. 85–141, §4(a), 71 Stat. 356; June 30, 1958, Pub. L. 85–477, ch. II, §201, ch. V, §501(3), (4), 72 Stat. 262, 270; July 24, 1959, Pub. L. 86–108, ch. II, §201, 73 Stat. 248; May 14, 1960, Pub. L. 86–472, ch. II, §201(a), (b), 74 Stat. 134, authorized economic assistance to sustain and increase the military effort and provided for executive authority to furnish assistance, appropriations, marine insurance and assistance for Korea. See section 2354(d) of this title.
EXHIBIT 32





CASCADE TECHNOLOGIES CORP.





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. Section 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with Amendment No. 1 to the Annual Report of Cascade Technologies Corp. (the “Company”) on Form 10-K for the year ending August 31, 2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Jacqueline Danforth, as Principal Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1)
The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)
The information contained in this Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.








Date: April 23, 2010
By:
/s/Jacqueline DanforthName:
Jacqueline DanforthTitle:
Principal Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer




A signed original of this written statement required by Section 1350 of Title 18 of the United States Code has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.





The foregoing certification is being furnished as an exhibit to the Report pursuant to Item 601(b)(32) of Regulation S-K and Section 1350 of Title 18 of the United States Code and, accordingly, is not being filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission as part of the Report and is not to be incorporated by reference into any filing of the Company under the Securities Act of 1933 or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (whether made before or after the date of the Report, irrespective of any general incorporation language contained in such filing.)
Exhibit 99.4
  
    By:
    
    /s/ Mary Lou MalanoskiName:
    
    Mary Lou MalanoskiTitle:
    
    Vice Chair and Head of
Investment Banking
### **CHAPTER 23—PROTECTION OF CITIZENS ABROAD**

#### SUBCHAPTER I—GENERAL

Sec.
1731.
Protection to naturalized citizens abroad.
1732.
Release of citizens imprisoned by foreign governments.
1733.
Interagency Hostage Recovery Coordinator.

#### SUBCHAPTER II—HOSTAGE RECOVERY AND HOSTAGE-TAKING ACCOUNTABILITY

1741.
Assistance for United States nationals unlawfully or wrongfully detained abroad.
1741a.
Special Envoy for Hostage Affairs.
1741b.
Hostage Recovery Fusion Cell.
1741c.
Hostage Response Group.
1741d.
Authorization of imposition of sanctions.
1741e.
Definitions.
1741f.
Rule of construction.
### §3913. Teacher institutes

#### (a) Authorization to make competitive grants; covered institutions, businesses, etc.; purpose

The Foundation shall, in accordance with the provisions of this subchapter, make competitive grants to institutions of higher education, businesses, nonprofit private organizations (including schools), local education agencies, professional engineering and scientific associations, museums, libraries, public broadcasting entities (as defined in section 397(11) of title 47), and appropriate State agencies to support institutes and workshops for supervisors and teachers in public and private elementary and secondary schools for the purpose of improving the subject knowledge and teaching skills of such teachers in the areas of mathematics and science.

#### (b) Equitable distribution of grants; awards in each State

In making grants under this section, the Foundation shall assure that there is an equitable distribution among States of institutes established and operated with funds made available under this section. The Foundation shall award not less than one institute in each State, except that the Foundation may waive this requirement if there is no proposal from a State which meets the requirements of this subchapter. Proposals which exceed $300,000 in any fiscal year incorporating the services or resources of more than two entities in the design and operation of the institute, may be funded at the discretion of the Director of the Foundation.

#### (c) Cooperation of advanced technology businesses and other businesses

Institutes assisted under this subchapter may, to the extent possible, involve the cooperation of advanced technology businesses and other businesses which are able to supply assistance in the teaching of mathematics and science.

#### (d) Requirement of involvement in planning and development

In making grants under this subchapter, the Foundation shall require assurances that local education agencies will be involved in the planning and development of the institute in the case of applications submitted by other eligible applicants described in subsection (a) of this section, or that one or more such applicants will be involved in the planning and development of the institute in the case of applications submitted by State or local education agencies.

(Pub. L. 98–377, title I, §103, as added Pub. L. 99–159, title II, §201, Nov. 22, 1985, 99 Stat. 894.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Prior Provisions

A prior section 3913, Pub. L. 98–377, title I, §113, Aug., 11, 1984, 98 Stat. 1269, related to distribution of assistance and limitation on grants, prior to the general revision of this subchapter by section 201 of Pub. L. 99–159. See subsec. (b) of this section.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

DAY HIGH

 15,854

 11,677

 11,292

 11,735

 10,038

 9,713

 9,850

 8,903

 8,822

 10,298

 11,622

 10,065

 10,294

 7,825

 8,224

 7,864

 6,657

 5,213

 5,458

 5,241

 5,033

 5,742

 5,469

 5,210

 4,865

 5,181

 4,478

 4,967

 4,378

 4,422

 4,516

 4,092

 3,842

 4,342

 3,352

 4,338

 3,107

 4,340

 3,540

 3,699

 4,583

 4,514

 4,379

 3,643

 3,216

 3,600

 2,778

 2,487

 2,551

 2,529

 2,018

 2,469

 2,360

 2,085

 1,923

 2,010

 1,887

 1,703

 1,656

 1,908

 9,456

 7,977

 8,073

 7,796

 6,669

 7,194

 5,608

 6,153

 5,957

 7,180

 7,565

 7,113

 6,509

 5,728

 5,967

 5,625

 4,773

 3,986

 3,608

 3,733

 3,590

 3,619

 3,562

 3,500

 3,288

 3,298

 3,198

 3,181

 3,081

 3,156

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

JUNE 2014 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: July 31, 2014

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

PITTSBURG TOP ON THE SACRAMENTO RIVER
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY HIGH

 14,870

 12,711

 5,415

 3,276

 2,036

 1,463

 1,071

 880

 713

 641

 643

 857

 891

 991

 661

 652

 668

 599

 479

 489

 1,073

 2,163

 1,734

 361

 349

 314

 295

 267

 245

 229

 216

 7,174

 5,126

 1,447

 1,201

 721

 405

 354

 448

 438

 439

 464

 447

 400

 398

 386

 373

 373

 370

 356

 346

 328

 328

 338

 308

 282

 263

 244

 209

 216

 196

 194

 10,447

 8,616

 3,582

 2,077

 1,235

 895

 690

 597

 555

 510

 509

 520

 490

 498

 450

 438

 457

 431

 388

 378

 432

 587

 469

 341

 327

 290

 271

 251

 229

 211

 204

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

DECEMBER 2012 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: February 7, 2013

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

PITTSBURG TOP ON THE SACRAMENTO RIVER
### IN THE SUPREME COURT STATE OF NORTH DAKOT A

2021 ND 78

Delvin Lamont Shaw, Petitioner and Appellant

v. State of North Dakota, Respondent and Appellee

No. 20200190

Appeal from the District Court of Grand Forks County, Northeast Central Judicial District, the Honorable John A. Thelen , Judge.

AFFIRMED

. Per Curiam

. Delvin L. Shaw, Bismarck, ND , petitioner and appellant; submitted on brief.
Carmell F. Mattison, Assistant State’s Attorney, Grand Forks, ND , for respondent and appellee; submit ted on brief.1 Shaw v. State No. 20200190
Per Curiam

. [¶1] Delvin Lamont Shaw appeals from an order denying his application for
p ost

- conviction relief

. Following a jury trial, Shaw was convicted on charges of murder and burglary. Shaw argues the district court erred in denying his application for post

- conviction relief because he received ineffective assistance of appellate counsel on direct appeal

. Shaw contends his appellate counsel was ineffective because counsel did not consult with him about the objectives of his appeal and failed to raise issues that S haw preserved at trial. Following a post

conviction evidentiary hearing, the court found Shaw failed to demonstrate any actual prejudice and therefore failed to satisfy the secon d prong of the Strickland test for ine ffective assistance of counsel.
[¶2] We conclude the district court’s find ings are not clearly erroneous. Courts need not address both prongs of the Strickland test for ineffective assistance of counsel claims if the matte r can be resolve d by addressing only
one prong. Rencountre v. State , 2015 ND 62, ¶ 7, 860 N.W.2d 837 . The court did not err in denying Shaw’s application for post

- conviction relief, and we summarily affirm under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(2) and (7).
[¶3] Gerald W. VandeWall e , Acting C

. J

. Daniel J. Crother s Lisa Fair McEver s Jerod E. Tuft e D ouglas L. Mattso n , D .J

.

[¶4] T h e Honorable Douglas L. Mattson, D.J., sitting in place of Jensen, C.J., disqualified.
Exhibit 4.2


 


AMENDMENT

TO

ACTINIUM PHARMACEUTICALS, INC. WARRANT TO PURCHASE COMMON STOCK


 


Pursuant to Section 9(a) of the Warrant to Purchase Common Stock
of (the “Warrant”) of Actinium Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (the “Company”), originally dated December
17, 2012, issued to Carnegie Hill Partners in the amount of 353,023 warrant shares, the Board of Directors of the Company has duly
adopted a resolution approving this Amendment to the Warrant to extend the term of the Warrant to February 21, 2022 as follows:


 


	 	1.	Section 1 of the Warrant is hereby amended to read in its entirety as follows:




 


“Term
of Warrant. Subject to the terms and conditions set forth herein, this Warrant shall be exercisable, in whole or in part,
during the term commencing (“Issuance Date”) December 17, 2012 (the “Warrant Issue Date”),
and ending at 5:00 p.m., Eastern Time on February 21, 2022 and shall be void thereafter.”


 


	 	2.	All other terms and provisions of the Warrant shall remain unchanged and in full force and effect as written.




 


IN WITNESS WHEREOF, this
Amendment to the Warrant is made effective this 8th day of November, 2018.


 


	 	 	ACTINIUM PHARMACEUTICALS, INC.
	 	 	 	 	 
	 	 	By:	 	 /s/ David Nicholson
	 	 	Name:	 	David Nicholson
	 	 	Title:	 	Chairman Compensation Committee
#### William O’Keefe, Respondent, v. Adrian Bos et al., Appellants.

Order -unanimously affirmed, with $20 costs and disbursements. No opinion. The date for the examination to proceed to be fixed in the order. Settle order on notice. Present — Dore, J. P., Cohn, Callahan, Van Voorhis and Shientag, JJ.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

DAY HIGH

 15,246

 16,278

 15,604

 19,202

 18,845

 15,841

 20,981

 20,653

 18,463

 17,859

 16,545

 12,741

 11,643

 13,246

 14,505

 21,219

 23,177

 23,059

 20,813

 25,915

 25,561

 21,782

 23,447

 24,071

 23,254

 23,120

 17,757

 16,772

 19,444

 20,100

 3,920

 4,677

 4,399

 4,183

 3,648

 3,663

 3,844

 3,886

 3,775

 3,176

 3,069

 2,681

 3,427

 3,960

 4,741

 4,901

 8,035

 7,484

 7,873

 8,154

 7,758

 5,770

 3,945

 8,595

 8,599

 8,151

 5,408

 8,770

 8,743

 9,032

 8,268

 8,689

 9,216

 9,968

 10,121

 9,982

 11,009

 11,275

 10,834

 9,896

 9,481

 8,826

 8,402

 8,251

 8,377

 9,718

 12,046

 12,657

 13,975

 16,270

 15,137

 14,127

 12,687

 15,555

 15,919

 14,957

 12,903

 13,003

 13,346

 13,401

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

JUNE 2009 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: July 29, 2009

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

PORT CHICAGO TOP IN SUISUN BAY
EXHIBIT 31.2
                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Jose Acevedo, Treasurer of Lotus Capital Corp. certify that:

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of Lotus Capital Corp.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a
material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements
made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not
misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the
financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the small business
issuer as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. The small business issuer's other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible
for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined
in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the small business issuer and
have:

(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure
controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that
material information relating to the small business issuer, including its
consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities,
particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

(b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the small business issuer's disclosure
controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the
effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the
period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

(c) Disclosed in this report any change in the small business issuer's internal
control over financial reporting that occurred during the small business
issuer's most recent fiscal quarter (the small business issuer's fourth fiscal
quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is
reasonably likely to materially affect, the small business issuer's internal
control over financial reporting; and

5. The small business issuer's other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed,
based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial
reporting, to the small business issuer's auditors and the audit committee of
the small business issuer's board of directors (or persons performing the
equivalent functions):

(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably
likely to adversely affect the small business issuer's ability to record,
process, summarize and report financial information; and

(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the small business issuer's internal
control over financial reporting.

Dated: August 17, 2005

/s/ Jose Acevedo
----------------
Jose Acevedo
Treasurer
(Principal Financial Officer and Principal Accounting Officer)
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 02-10469 Conference Calendar

OZIEL GONZALEZ MARTINEZ, Petitioner-Appellant,

versus SAM PRATT, Warden, Respondent-Appellee.

-------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas USDC No. 3:02-CV-91-R

-------------------- October 30, 2002 Before DeMOSS, BENAVIDES, and STEWART, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: * Ozeil Gonzalez Martinez, federal prisoner # 75159-9000, was convicted in 1993 of conspiracy to import at least one kilogram of heroin, conspiracy to possess with intent to distribute at least one kilogram of heroin, and several counts of possession with intent to distribute heroin. He appeals the district court’s denial of his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 petition, wherein he argued that his sentence of concurrent terms of 210 months’No. 02-10469 -2- imprisonment for each count was in violation of Apprendi v. New Jersey , 530 U.S. 466 (2000), because his sentences were based upon six kilograms of heroin. The district court determined that Martinez had not met the requirements of 28 U.S.C. § 2255's savings clause and that Martinez could not raise his claim in a 28 U.S.C. § 2241 petition. His sentences were below the lowest statutory maximum for his convictions. See 21 U.S.C. § 841(b)(1)(C). There was no Apprendi violation. See United States v. Clinton , 256 F.3d 311, 314 (5th Cir.), cert denied , 122 S. Ct. 492 (2001); United States v. Doggett , 230 F.3d 160, 166 (5th Cir. 2000), cert. denied , 531 U.S. 1177 (2001). Further, the district court’s determination that Apprendi does not apply retroactively to cases on collateral review and that an Apprendi claim does not satisfy the requirements of 28 U.S.C. § 2255's savings clause was correct. See Wesson v. U.S. Penitentiary, Beaumont, TX , 305 F.3d 343 (5th Cir. 2002).
AFFIRMED.
[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 76 (Wednesday, April 20, 2011)]
[Notices]
[Page 22172]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2011-9605]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY

Internal Revenue Service


Open Meeting of the Taxpayer Advocacy Panel Taxpayer Assistance 
Center Project Committee

AGENCY: Internal Revenue Service (IRS), Treasury.

ACTION: Notice of meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: An open meeting of the Taxpayer Advocacy Panel Taxpayer 
Assistance Center Project Committee will be conducted. The Taxpayer 
Advocacy Panel is soliciting public comments, ideas, and suggestions on 
improving customer service at the Internal Revenue Service.

DATES: The meeting will be held Tuesday, June 28, 2011.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ellen Smiley at 1-888-912-1227 or 414-
231-2360.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Notice is hereby given pursuant to Section 
10(a)(2) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, 5 U.S.C. App. (1988) 
that an open meeting of the Taxpayer Advocacy Panel Taxpayer Assistance 
Center Project Committee will be held Tuesday, June 28, 2011 at 2:00 
p.m. Central Time via telephone conference. The public is invited to 
make oral comments or submit written statements for consideration. Due 
to limited conference lines, notification of intent to participate must 
be made with Ms. Ellen Smiley. For more information please contact Ms. 
Smiley at 1-888-912-1227 or 414-231-2360, or write TAP Office Stop 
1006MIL, 211 West Wisconsin Avenue, Milwaukee, WI 53203-2221, or post 
comments to the Web site: http://www.improveirs.org.
    The agenda will include various IRS issues.

    Dated: April 15, 2011.
Shawn Collins,
Director, Taxpayer Advocacy Panel.
[FR Doc. 2011-9605 Filed 4-19-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4830-01-P
#### § 216.40 General.

An employee with a current connection with the railroad industry at the time of retirement may qualify for a supplemental annuity in addition to the regular employee annuity. Supplemental annuities are paid from a separate account funded by employer taxes in addition to those assessed for regular annuities. The Board reduces a supplemental annuity if the employee receives a private pension based on contributions from a railroad employer.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

DAY ELEV

 515.09

 513.90

 512.93

 511.98

 511.29

 510.09

 509.14

 508.82

 508.18

 507.93

 507.51

 507.34

 506.77

 506.17

 505.90

 505.58

 505.34

 505.22

 504.68

 504.27

 503.67

 503.02

 502.57

 502.16

 502.11

 501.46

 500.93

 499.97

 499.12

 498.72

 262.8

 258.9

 255.7

 252.6

 250.4

 246.6

 243.6

 242.5

 240.5

 239.7

 238.4

 237.9

 236.1

 234.3

 233.4

 232.4

 231.7

 231.3

 229.7

 228.4

 226.6

 224.6

 223.3

 222.1

 221.9

 220.0

 218.4

 215.6

 213.1

 211.9

STORAGE

-4.1

-3.9

-3.2

-3.1

-2.2

-3.8

-3.0

-1.0

-2.0

-0.8

-1.3

-0.5

-1.8

-1.9

-0.8

-1.0

-0.7

-0.4

-1.7

-1.3

-1.8

-2.0

-1.4

-1.2

-0.2

-1.9

-1.6

-2.8

-2.5

-1.2

CHANGE

363

83

376

513

1,111

464

957

1,710

1,049

1,772

1,578

2,271

1,859

1,908

2,197

1,705

1,859

2,283

1,693

1,927

1,537

1,231

1,187

1,222

1,922

1,137

1,371

771

702

1,135

INFLOW

 373

 331

 303

 301

 335

 366

 382

 338

 352

 374

 349

 452

 572

 649

 647

 560

 402

 395

 395

 400

 402

 366

 332

 299

 310

 331

 269

 234

 232

 230

MADERA

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

SPILL

 1,743

 1,438

 1,384

 1,489

 1,610

 1,748

 1,801

 1,629

 1,432

 1,526

 1,634

 1,807

 1,930

 1,930

 1,708

 1,364

 1,573

 1,807

 1,854

 1,889

 1,786

 1,571

 1,290

 1,286

 1,439

 1,525

 1,638

 1,701

 1,471

 1,216

FRIANT-KERN

 34

 32

 28

 19

 29

 30

 51

 13

 42

 28

 16

 39

 11

 26

 22

 36

 16

 26

 38

 30

 29

 48

 8

 21

 12

 21

 22

 27

 18

 40

C.F.S.

 .32

 .30

 .27

 .18

 .28

 .29

 .50

 .13

 .41

 .28

 .16

 .39

 .11

 .26

 .22

 .36

 .16

 .26

 .38

 .30

 .30

 .49

 .08

 .22

 .12

 .22

 .23

 .28

 .19

 .43

INCHES

 .27

 .22

 .02

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

PRECIP

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

SEPTEMBER 2000 MILLERTON LAKE DAILY OPERATIONS RUN DATE: January 28, 2002

IN LAKE

EVAPORATION

INCHES

C.F.S.

COMPUTED*

1000 ACRE-FEET

RELEASE - C.F.S. 

TOTALS -55.0 39,893 11,281 48,219 0 812 8.12 .51

ACRE-FEET -54,959 79,128 22,376 95,642 0 1,611

COMMENTS:

* COMPUTED INFLOW IS THE SUM OF CHANGE IN STORAGE, RELEASES, PUMPING AND EVAPORATION.

SUMMARY

RELEASE (ACRE-FEET)

CANALS

FRIANT-KERN

MADERA

 95,642

 22,376 132,478

PRECIPITATION

THIS MONTH =

JULY 1, 2000 TO DATE = 0.51

 266.9

 14,460 0.51

CANALS

AT FRIANT

TOTAL RELEASES

OUTLET

 259

 259

 259

 257

 257

 256

 245

 240

 240

 240

 241

 241

 241

 241

 241

 241

 241

 241

 239

 239

 239

 238

 238

 237

 237

 237

 237

 237

 236

 236

RIVER

 7,290

 14,460

RIVER