alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 321.2 Filing claims for benefits electronically. ( a ) *Electronic filing.* A claim for benefits under the Railroad Unemployment Insurance Act may be filed electronically through the Board's Internet Web site, *http://www.rrb.gov ,* utilizing a User ID and a PIN/Password.
( b ) *Adjudication of claims filed electronically.* A claim for benefits under the Railroad Unemployment Insurance Act filed electronically shall be adjudicated in accordance with the procedures set forth in this part.
( c ) *Date of filing.* The date of filing for a claim for benefits under the Railroad Unemployment Insurance Act filed electronically shall be the date that the electronic filing of the claim is accepted by the Board's electronic system. If an attempt to file a claim for benefits under the Railroad Unemployment Insurance Act is unsuccessful and is rejected by the Board's electronic system, the claimant must submit another claim for benefits. If the subsequent claim for benefits, either filed electronically or on paper, is received by the Board within 30 days from the date of the notification that the initial filing was rejected, the Board will establish the filing date of the subsequent claim as the date the rejected claim was attempted to be filed.
Exhibit 99.1

CERTIFICATIONS UNDER SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 (18 U.S.C.
1350).

THE FOLLOWING STATEMENT IS BEING MADE TO THE SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
SOLELY FOR PURPOSES OF SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 (18 U.S.C.
1350), WHICH CARRIES WITH IT CERTAIN PENALTIES IN THE EVENT OF A KNOWING OR
WILLFUL REPRESENTATION.

Securities and Exchange Commission
450 Fifth Street, NW
Washington, DC 20549

      Re: The Flight International Group, Inc.

Ladies and Gentlemen:

In accordance with the requirements of Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, the undersigned, Matthew J. Nowicki, the chief
financial officer of The Flight International Group, Inc. (the "Company"),
certifies that:

(1)   the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the period ended
      October 31, 2002 (the "Report") fully complies with the requirements of
      Section 13 (a) or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C.
      78m or 78o(d)); and

(2)   the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Company.

Dated as of this 19th day of December, 2002.

                                               /s/ Matthew J. Nowicki
                                               ----------------------------
                                               Matthew J. Nowicki,
                                               Chief Financial Officer


<PAGE>


         THE FOLLOWING STATEMENT IS BEING MADE TO THE SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE
COMMISSION SOLELY FOR PURPOSES OF SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
(18 U.S.C. 1350), WHICH CARRIES WITH IT CERTAIN PENALTIES IN THE EVENT OF A
KNOWING OR WILLFUL REPRESENTATION.

Securities and Exchange Commission
450 Fifth Street, NW
Washington, DC 20549

      Re:  The Flight International Group, Inc.

Ladies and Gentlemen:

         In accordance with the requirements of Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, the undersigned, David E.
Sandlin, Chief Executive Officer of The Flight International Group, Inc. (the
"Company"), certifies that:

(1)   the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the period ended
      October 31, 2002 (the "Report") fully complies with the requirements of
      Section 13 (a) or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C.
      78m or 78o(d)); and

(2)   the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Company.

Dated as of this 19th day of December, 2002.

                                            /s/ David E. Sandlin
                                   ------------------------------------------
                                   David E. Sandlin, Chief Executive Officer
### §§97 to 97d. Omitted

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Sections 97 to 97d, act July 30, 1947, ch. 356, title I, §1, 61 Stat. 531, 532, set up a meat inspection fund and provided for payment for meat inspection service by the persons or organizations who were furnished such inspection on and after July 1, 1947. These provisions ceased to be effective on July 1, 1948, under section 98 of this title which requires the cost of such inspection to be borne by the United States. The unobligated balance in the meat inspection fund was carried to the general fund of the Treasury by act June 19, 1948, ch. 543, §1, 62 Stat. 515.
**UN PUBLISHED**  UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

**No. 10**  **- 7372** 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA , Plaintiff

– Appellee ,
v. CLEVELAND MCLEAN, JR. , Defendant

- Appellant .
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Easte rn District of Virginia , at Norfolk . Robert G. Doumar, Senior District Judge. ( 2:90

- cr - 00105

- HCM

- TEM
- 5; 2:08

- cv - 00588

- RGD )
Submitted : April 14, 2011 Decided: April 28, 2011
Before WILKINSON, NIEMEYER, and SHEDD , Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by un p ublished per curiam opinion
. Cleveland McLean, Jr., Appellant Pro Se. Neil H. MacBride, United States Attorney, Alexandria, Virginia, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM: Cleveland McLean, Jr., ap peals the district court ’ s order denying his 18 U.S.C. § 3582 (2006) motion
. We previously remanded the case for further consideration of McLean’s motion. The district court reconsidered the motion and again denied it. We have reviewed the record and fin d no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. McLean , Nos. 2:90

- cr - 00105

- HCM

- TEM
- 5; 2:08

- cv - 00588

- RGD (E.D. Va. filed Sept. 13 and entered Sept. 14 , 2010) . We grant McLean’s motion to supple ment his informal brief. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED
§ 408.360 Can you cancel your request to withdraw your application? You may request to cancel your request to withdraw your application and have your application reinstated if all of the following requirements are met: ( a ) You, or someone who may sign an application for you under § 408.315, file a written request for cancellation at a place described in § 408.325;
( b ) You are alive at the time you file your request for cancellation; and
( c ) A cancellation request received after we have approved your withdrawal must be filed no later than 60 days after the date of the notice of approval.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY HIGH

 8,109

 13,534

 15,119

 22,883

 16,663

 12,184

 9,660

 5,449

 2,953

 1,645

 1,099

 946

 1,131

 2,709

 2,914

 3,524

 7,623

 12,308

 13,956

 16,358

 15,545

 13,597

 11,984

 11,823

 11,235

 10,018

 10,128

 9,435

 12,359

 13,323

 16,047

 423

 388

 392

 4,064

 1,663

 1,301

 650

 580

 432

 405

 351

 351

 327

 307

 287

 270

 280

 301

 504

 2,780

 3,118

 3,089

 2,620

 3,804

 3,504

 2,871

 2,453

 2,757

 2,333

 2,053

 2,140

 2,126

 4,090

 5,754

 11,548

 9,635

 6,711

 4,770

 2,683

 1,511

 849

 624

 534

 510

 684

 684

 763

 1,655

 4,616

 6,787

 9,132

 8,941

 8,363

 7,408

 7,427

 7,093

 6,154

 5,739

 5,750

 6,574

 6,699

 7,998

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

MARCH 2001 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: April 9, 2001

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

PORT CHICAGO BOTTOM IN SUISUN BAY
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
<CURRENCY> U.S. DOLLARS
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1998
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                1.00000
<CASH>                                          24,837
<SECURITIES>                                    44,258
<RECEIVABLES>                                   68,476
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                     24,817
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               188,232
<PP&E>                                         254,209
<DEPRECIATION>                                 100,269      
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 602,821
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          129,156
<BONDS>                                        170,412
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         2,544
<OTHER-SE>                                     170,841
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   602,821
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               161,625
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  169,568
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                              (14,530)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               7,717
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (1,130)
<INCOME-TAX>                                     5,653
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (6,783)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  (0.270)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  (0.270)
        

</TABLE>
§ 30.516 Under what circumstances would recovery of an overpayment defeat the purpose of the Act? Recovery of an overpayment will defeat the purpose of the Act if such recovery would cause hardship to the recipient because: ( a ) The recipient from whom OWCP seeks recovery needs substantially all of his or her current income to meet current ordinary and necessary living expenses; and
( b ) The recipient's assets do not exceed two months' expenditures as determined by OWCP using the Bureau of Labor Statistics Consumer Expenditure Survey tables.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY HIGH

 11,145

 10,779

 11,844

 10,886

 12,033

 10,896

 8,399

 9,107

 7,451

 4,262

 1,957

 2,109

 6,315

 8,748

 11,750

 11,440

 10,944

 9,837

 9,910

 10,071

 10,574

 11,007

 10,940

 12,885

 10,038

 10,188

 11,328

 14,007

 15,744

 15,245

 15,043

 623

 950

 567

 493

 556

 460

 333

 351

 306

 287

 240

 261

 368

 486

 721

 757

 622

 1,324

 591

 559

 502

 618

 591

 1,046

 736

 679

 716

 773

 1,929

 2,153

 1,504

 4,262

 4,692

 4,535

 4,086

 3,897

 3,572

 2,610

 3,000

 2,169

 1,431

 700

 744

 1,987

 3,545

 4,685

 4,947

 4,180

 4,479

 3,425

 3,483

 4,116

 4,642

 5,581

 6,903

 5,988

 4,410

 4,550

 5,079

 6,341

 7,046

 7,377

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

MAY 2000 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: June 6, 2000

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

PORT CHICAGO TOP IN SUISUN BAY
Consent of Raymond James & Associates, Inc.
§ 404.951 Official record. ( a ) *Hearing recording.* All hearings will be recorded. The hearing recording will be prepared as a typed copy of the proceedings if— ( 1 ) The case is sent to the Appeals Council without a decision or with a recommended decision by the administrative law judge;
( 2 ) You seek judicial review of your case by filing an action in a Federal district court within the stated time period, unless we request the court to remand the case; or
( 3 ) An administrative law judge or the Appeals Council asks for a written record of the proceedings.
( b ) *Contents of the official record.* All evidence upon which the administrative law judge relies for the decision must be contained in the record, either directly or by appropriate reference. The official record will include the applications, written statements, certificates, reports, affidavits, medical records, and other documents that were used in making the decision under review and any additional evidence or written statements that the administrative law judge admits into the record under §§ 404.929 and 404.935. All exhibits introduced as evidence must be marked for identification and incorporated into the record. The official record of your claim will contain all of the marked exhibits and a verbatim recording of all testimony offered at the hearing. It also will include any prior initial determinations or decisions on your claim.
[81 FR 90994, Dec. 16, 2016
### SUBCHAPTER II—DEFINITIONS
**Exhibit 32.2**

**Certification ofPrincipal Financial OfficerPursuant toSection 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. 1350)**

In connection withthe Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31,2006 (the “Report”) of Federal Services Acquisition Corporation (the “Registrant”),as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, I,Stuart R. Lloyd, President and Chief Financial Officer of the Registrant,hereby certify that:

(1)   The Reportfully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) ofthe Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

(2)   The information contained in the Reportfairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and resultsof operations of the Registrant.
| Date: March 26, 2007 |   | By:    |       | /s/ STUART R. LLOYD                                  |
|---------------------------|--------|--------|------------|-----------------------------------------------------------|
|                      |   |   | ** ** | **Stuart  R. Lloyd**                                      |
|                      |   |   | ** ** | **Executive  Vice President and Chief Financial Officer** |
|                      |   |   | ** ** | **(Principal  Financial Officer)**                        |

 

----
**Exhibit
      32**





CERTIFICATIONS
      PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350





In
      connection with the Annual Report of Stone Arcade Acquisition Corporation (the
      “Company”) on Form 10-K/A for the year ended December 31, 2005 as filed with the
      Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Roger
      Stone, Chief Executive Officer (Principal Executive and Financial Officer)
      of
      the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant
      to
      section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my
      knowledge:




(1)  The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)  The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and result of operations of the Company for the period
      certified.




Signed
                  on this 12thday of December, 2006/s/ Roger
                StoneRoger
                  Stone





The
      foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to Section 906 of
      the
      Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter
      63
      of Title 18, United States Code) and is not being filed as part of the Form
      10-K/A or as a separate disclosure document.
September 2023

STORAGE INFLOW- C.F.S. RELEASE - C.F.S. GAINS(+)

ACRE-FEET O'NEILL S.LUIS CALIF. O'NEILL

S.LUIS DOS AMIGOS * OR LOSS

(-)

DAY ELEV IN LAKE CHANGE PUMPING GEN. AQUEDUCT GEN. PUMPING PUMPING DELIV. C.F.S.

45,368

1 221.45 46,941 1,573 1,381 1,341 5,839 0 0 8,069 301

2 221.61 47,362 421 1,628 2,345 4,843 0 637 8,048 81

3 221.86 48,019 657 1,918 1,347 4,393 0 635 6,708 17

4 221.40 46,810 -1,209 1,789 1,178 4,748 0 637 7,710 21

5 220.59 44,688 -2,122 1,405 1,762 4,682 0 635 8,012 -271

6 222.05 48,517 3,829 1,494 6,004 2,512 0 0 8,192 112

7 222.11 48,677 160 1,395 4,335 2,317 0 0 7,832 -135

8 222.46 49,607 930 1,441 4,312 2,320 0 0 7,743 139

9 222.45 49,580 -27 1,666 3,497 2,078 0 0 7,145 -110

10 222.85 50,646 1,066 1,984 3,167 2,090 0 0 6,526 -177

11 222.75 50,379 -267 1,568 3,873 2,198 0 0 7,490 -283

12 221.11 46,049 -4,330 1,450 2,237 2,146 0 0 7,746 -271

13 221.29 46,521 472 1,538 4,391 2,337 0 0 7,887 -141

14 221.50 47,073 552 1,244 4,607 2,279 0 0 7,574 -277

15 221.82 47,914 841 1,269 1,313 4,575 0 0 6,573 -160

16 221.47 46,994 -920 1,525 985 4,185 0 0 6,897 -262

17 221.16 46,180 -814 1,793 580 4,242 0 656 6,114 -255

18 220.93 45,577 -603 1,485 1,653 4,763 0 1,146 6,775 -284

19 221.05 45,892 315 1,110 1,320 4,983 0 0 7,064 -190

20 221.03 45,839 -53 885 1,326 5,072 0 0 7,092 -218

21 220.81 45,263 -576 673 577 5,730 0 0 7,392 123

22 220.81 45,263 0 929 165 5,815 0 0 7,035 126

23 221.88 48,071 2,808 1,042 1,143 5,865 0 0 6,529 -105

24 222.93 50,859 2,788 1,101 657 5,644 0 0 6,099 103

25 223.42 52,169 1,310 940 650 5,763 0 0 6,767 76

26 221.00 45,760 -6,409 716 0 6,373 0 2,905 7,228 -187

27 220.63 44,792 -968 586 496 6,464 0 412 7,496 -126

28 221.24 46,390 1,598 662 2,439 6,890 0 1,312 7,703 -171

29 220.85 45,368 -1,022 477 1,484 7,153 0 1,977 7,561 -91

30 220.63 44,792 -576 547 1,485 6,748 0 2,129 6,689 -253

TOTALS -576 37,641 60,669 135,047 0 13,081 217,696 -2,868

ACRE-FEET -576 74,663 120,33

6

267,864 0 25,946 431,806 410 -5,687

* DAILY DEL. FIGURES UNAVAILABLE. TOT. DEL. IS INCLUDED IN COMPUTING MONTHLY TOTALS

SUMMARY

Release (ACRE-FEET)

O'Neill Generation 0 Dos Amigos Pump 431,806

San Luis Pump 25,946 Deliveries 410

Total 458162

Historical Archive and Report Database

Consolidated State-Federal O'Neill Forebay 

Daily Operations

Run Date: 1/30/2024
First Department,

April, 1914.

#### Julius Bodenheim, Respondent, v. The City of New York, Appellant, Impleaded with Others.

Appeal from an order of the Appellate Term, entered in the New York county clerk’s office on the 17th day of June, 1913, affirming a judgment of the Municipal Court and an order denying a motion for a new trial.

Per Curiam:

There was no evidence that the defendant was negligent. The determination of the Appellate Term and the judgment of the Municipal Court are, therefore, reversed and judgment directed for the defendant, with costs in all courts. Present — Ingraham, P. J., Clarke, Scott, Dowling and Hotchkiss, JJ. Determination of Appellate Term and judgment of Municipal Court reversed and judgment directed for defendant, with costs in all courts. Order to he settled on notice.
Exhibit 32.1  CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002  In connection with the Quarterly Report of ALCO, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2008 (the "Report"), I, Andrew Liu, Chief Executive Officer and Chairman of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:  1) The Report fully complies with the requirement of Section 13(a) or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and  2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the Company's financial position and results of operations.      By: /s/ Andrew Liu, CEO and Chairman  Date:August 14, 2008
---

Exhibit 13.1

|CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO                    
|---------------------------------------------
|18 U.S.C. §1350,                             
|AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO                       
|SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the annual report of Dejour Energy Inc. (the
Company) on Form 20-F for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2014 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report),
I, Robert Hodgkinson, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:

(1)           The Report fully
complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)           The information
contained in this Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

| | /s/Robert Hodgkinson       
| | ---------------------------
| | Robert Hodgkinson          
| | Chief Executive Officer    
| | Principal Executive Officer
| | April 21, 2015             

A signed original of this written statement required by Section
906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and
furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
The foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
§1350 and is not being filed as part of the annual report or as a separate
disclosure document.

---
Exhibit 21
 Subsidiaries of the Registrant
 Name, Jurisdiction
    
    RelationshipWilliams Partners Operating LLC, Delaware
    
    100%-owned by Williams Partners L.P.Williams Partners Finance Corporation, Delaware
    
    100%-owned by Williams Partners L.P.Carbonate Trend Pipeline LLC, Delaware
    
    100%-owned by Williams Partners Operating LLCMid-Continent Fractionation and Storage, LLC,
Delaware
    
    100%-owned by Williams Partners Operating LLCDiscovery Producer Services LLC, Delaware
    
    60%-owned by Williams Partners Operating LLCDiscovery Gas Transmission LLC, Delaware
    
    100%-owned by Discovery Producer Services LLCWilliams Four Corners LLC, Delaware
    
    100%-owned by Williams Partners Operating LLCWamsutter LLC, Delaware
    
    100% Class A LLC membership interest and 65%
Class C LLC interest.
### SUBCHAPTER I—ESTABLISHMENT
(No. 6666

#### Northern Propane Gas Company, Claimant, *vs.*State of Illinois, Department of Corrections, Respondent.

*Opinion filed July 14, 1972.*

Northern Propane Gas Company, Claimant, pro se.

William J. Scott, Attorney General; William E. Webber, Assistant Attorney General, for Respondent.

Perlin, C.J.