alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY ELEV

 222.16

 222.52

 222.21

 221.64

 220.64

 221.39

 221.75

 222.13

 222.11

 221.84

 221.62

 221.03

 221.77

 221.87

 221.37

 221.21

 221.40

 221.27

 221.04

 222.32

 222.64

 222.13

 221.86

 221.25

 221.35

 221.53

 221.60

 221.52

 221.86

 221.38

 221.59

 48,810

 49,767

 48,942

 47,441

 44,818

 46,784

 47,730

 48,730

 48,677

 47,966

 47,388

 45,839

 47,782

 48,045

 46,731

 46,311

 46,810

 46,469

 45,865

 49,235

 50,086

 48,730

 48,019

 46,416

 46,679

 47,152

 47,336

 47,125

 48,019

 46,758

 47,309

STORAGE

-2,370

+957

-825

-1,501

-2,623

+1,966

+946

+1,000

-53

-711

-578

-1,549

+1,943

+263

-1,314

-420

+499

-341

-604

+3,370

+851

-1,356

-711

-1,603

+263

+473

+184

-211

+894

-1,261

+551

CHANGE

140

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

64

0

0

0

0

0

0

PUMPING

 740

 479

 544

 604

 853

 535

 346

 542

 404

 481

 444

 371

 533

 557

 1,013

 1,004

 1,015

 1,017

 1,071

 312

 369

 610

 748

 1,014

 700

 698

 266

 445

 0

 1,354

 0

PUMPING

 1,114

 740

 1,117

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

PUMPING

 85

 208

 320

 779

 1,170

 1,202

 1,208

 1,188

 1,679

 2,042

 1,496

 1,535

 1,456

 971

 1,362

 1,221

 691

 1,304

 657

 93

 889

 673

 168

 655

 362

 0

 543

 385

 0

 132

 122

GEN.

*

+38

+42

-10

-44

-39

+38

-74

-45

-54

-73

-52

+54

-158

-2

-16

+18

-104

-81

-99

-40

+135

-120

-42

-41

-55

+36

+2

-34

-30

-64

+252

OR

UNITED STATES 

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION

CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT

CONSOLIDATED STATE-FEDERAL O'NEILL FOREBAY January 16, 2015

DAILY OPERATIONS

OCTOBER 2014 RUN DATE:

IN LAKE GEN.

ACRE-FEET O'NEILL

RELEASE - C.F.S. 

TOTALS -3,871 204 24,596 2,971 19,069 -662

ACRE-FEET -3,871 405 48,786 5,893 37,823

SUMMARY

 296

RELEASE (ACRE-FEET)

O'NEILL GEN. 48,786

SAN LUIS PUMP 5,893 296

 51,180

DOS AMIGOS PUMP 37,823

DELIVERIES 

S. LUIS O'NEILL

 0

 1,242

 1,242

 0

 0

 1,867

 1,838

 1,856

 1,665

 2,158

 1,665

 863

 3,098

 1,650

 1,651

 1,953

 1,950

 1,947

 1,460

 1,927

 1,252

 720

 600

 600

 900

 900

 900

 600

 0

 480

 0

 36,984

 73,358

CALIF. DOS AMIGOS

AQUEDUCT

565

627

333

670

740

823

267

423

446

79

36

208

29

12

77

42

112

284

63

218

299

0

0

302

286

0

0

158

480

434

297

 8,310

 16,483

S. LUIS

DELIV.

GAINS(+)

LOSS(-)

C.F.S.

INFLOW - C.F.S.

STATE OF CALIFORNIA

THE RESOURCES AGENCY

DEPARTMENT OF WATER RESOURCES

STATE WATER PROJECT

TOTAL 92,798

-1,313

* DAILY DEL. FIGURES UNAVAILABLE. TOT. DEL. IS INCLUDED IN COMPUTING MONTHLY TOTALS 

Table 18
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY HIGH

 4,879

 5,160

 4,902

 5,343

 5,428

 5,162

 5,664

 6,684

 6,989

 6,560

 6,473

 6,457

 5,979

 5,808

 5,720

 5,670

 5,598

 6,277

 6,417

 6,879

 6,657

 5,994

 5,959

 5,974

 6,145

 5,833

 5,743

 5,354

 5,991

 5,613

 6,333

 2,577

 2,369

 2,612

 2,415

 2,306

 1,799

 2,349

 2,341

 2,366

 2,296

 2,443

 2,770

 2,765

 2,688

 2,926

 2,875

 2,857

 3,035

 2,784

 2,937

 2,725

 2,793

 2,877

 2,847

 3,129

 2,733

 2,750

 3,005

 3,023

 3,022

 3,084

 3,568

 3,626

 3,651

 3,557

 3,450

 3,472

 3,857

 4,007

 4,127

 4,081

 4,250

 4,382

 4,259

 4,042

 4,033

 4,049

 4,129

 4,400

 4,405

 4,508

 4,207

 4,403

 4,353

 4,488

 4,601

 4,258

 4,056

 4,127

 4,114

 4,094

 4,143

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

AUGUST 2014 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: September 2, 2014

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

PITTSBURG TOP ON THE SACRAMENTO RIVER
- FPL_1559-Cocr-1
- FPL_1559-Cocr-2
- FPL_1559-Cocr-3
- FPL_1559-Cocr-4
- FPL_1559-Cocr-5
- FPL_1559-Cocr-6
- FPL_1559-Cocr-7
- FPL_1559-Cocr-8
- FPL_1559-Cocr-9
- FPL_1559-Cocr-10
#### F. G. Keens v. Buffalo County et al.

Filed December 9, 1897.

No. 7663.

Review: Proceedings Before County Board: Evidence. Where error proceedings present no question, except one of fact, and there ex- ■ isted no means by which the evidence upon which such question was determined by an inferior board or tribunal could be preserved upon the hearing before it, the finding of such board or tribunal must be affirmed.

Error from the district court of Buffalo county. Tried below before Holcomb, J.

*Affirmed.*

*R. A. Moore,*for plaintiff in error.

*Norris Broion, contra.*

*2Ryan, C.

This cause was brought into this court upon the petition in error of F. Gf. Keens for the reversal of a judgment of the district court of Buffalo county affirming the action of the board of county commissioners of said county with reference to the assessment of said Keens in the year 1893. The record of the county board recites the proceedings with reference to the subject-matter just indicated, as follows:

> “Consideration of the matter of the assessment of F. Gf. Keens being in order, his attorney, Mr. Moore, being present, stated that his client, Mr. Keens, would come before the board to be questioned relative to off-set claimed by him, but that he refused to bring books or papers or other evidence to substantiate his word in the matter.

> “Moved by Stuckey and seconded by Hoag that this board refuse to allow the prayer of F. G. Keens in the matter of his assessment on the ground that there is not sufficient evidence before them on which to act, and that this board have requested said Keens to appear with his books and his witnesses and be examined under oath as to the nature, extent, and character of said alleged indebtedness, and he refused to do so. Ayes and nays being called for resulted as follows: Ayes — Aron, Brady, Bennett, Collard, Day, Deets, Elliott, Ferris, Fisher, Hoag, Ihde, Johnson, Lambert, Lunger, Mohring, Mortimer, McNeal, Pickett, Pokorny, Richards, Salisbury, and Stuckey; total, 23. Nays — Bowie and Millett; total, 2. Absent — Towers, Fritz, and Jones. Mr. Moore, as attorney for Mr. Keens, then stated that he should take the matter of his assessment to the district court on writ of error.”

From this record it seems that the plaintiff in error failed before the board of county commissioners because he adduced no evidence to sustain his claim for the reduction of his assessment. In the record there are found *3copies of three affidavits certified by the county clerk of Buffalo county as having been filed and offered as evidence before the board. The proceedings sought to be reviewed were had July 16, 1893. At that time there was no provision for the settlement of a bill of exceptions in matters heard by a board of county commissioners, and therefore no means existed for preserving the evidence upon which questions of fact, by such board, had been determined. *(Hopkins v.*Scott, 38 Neb., 661.) The district court for this reason could not consider these affidavits, and, upon the record of the county board, could not do otherwise than sustain its action. The judgment of that court is therefore

Affirmed.
§ 404.1013 Included-excluded rule. ( a ) If part of your work for an employer during a pay period is covered as employment and part excluded, all of your work during that period is considered covered if at least one-half of your time in the pay period is in covered work. If you spend most of your time in a pay period doing work that is excluded, all of your work in that period is excluded.
( b ) A *pay period* is the period for which your employer ordinarily pays you. It cannot be more than 31 consecutive days. If the actual period is not always the same, your usual pay period will be used for applying the included-excluded rule.
( c ) The included-excluded rule does not apply and your covered work will be counted if— ( 1 ) Part of your work is covered by the Railroad Retirement Tax Act and part by the Social Security Act; or
( 2 ) You have no usual *pay period* of 31 consecutive days or less, or you have separate pay periods for covered and excluded work.
**EXHIBIT      32.1**

**OFFICER’S      SECTION 1350 CERTIFICATIONS**

|   | (i) | The                Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the three months ended March                31, 2006, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of                the                Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended,                and |
|--------|-----|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | (ii) | The                information contained in the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for                the three months ended March 31, 2006, fairly presents in all material                respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the                Company, at and for the periods                indicated. |
|--------|------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| Date:                May 15, 2006 | /s/                Steven A. Abney              |
|-----------------------------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------|
|                              | Steven                A. Abney                                      |
|                              | Executive                Vice President and Chief Financial Officer |
|                              | (Principal                Financial and Accounting Officer and      |
|                              | Acting                Principal Executive Officer)                  |
#### The People of the State of New York, ex rel. Francis R. Hitchcock, Appellant, v. The Officers of the Union Ferry Company of New York and Brooklyn, Respondents.

Order affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements. No opinion. Jenks, P. J., Thomas, Carr, Rich and Putnam, JJ., concurred.
§ 10.215 How does OWCP compute the number of days of COP used? COP is payable for a maximum of 45 calendar days, and every day used is counted toward this maximum. The following rules apply: ( a ) Time lost on the day or shift of the injury does not count toward COP. (Instead, the agency must keep the employee in a pay status for that period);
( b ) The first COP day is the first day disability begins following the date of injury (providing it is within the 45 days following the date of injury), except where the injury occurs before the beginning of the work day or shift, in which case the date of injury is charged to COP;
( c ) Any part of a day or shift (except for the day of the injury) counts as a full day toward the 45 calendar day total;
( d ) Regular days off are included if COP has been used on the regular work days immediately preceding or following the regular day(s) off, and medical evidence supports disability; and
( e ) Leave used during a period when COP is otherwise payable is counted toward the 45-day COP maximum as if the employee had been in a COP status.
( f ) For employees with part-time or intermittent schedules, all calendar days on which medical evidence indicates disability are counted as COP days, regardless of whether the employee was or would have been scheduled to work on those days. The rate at which COP is paid for these employees is calculated according to § 10.216(b).
§ 404.101 Introduction. ( a ) *Insured status.* This subpart explains what we mean when we say that a person has insured status under the social security program. It also describes how a person may become fully insured, currently insured or insured for disability benefits. Your insured status is a basic factor in determining if you are entitled to old-age or disability insurance benefits or to a period of disability. It is also a basic factor in determining if dependents' or survivors' insurance benefits or a lump-sum death payment are payable based on your earnings record. If you are neither fully nor currently insured, no benefits are payable based on your earnings. (Subpart D of this part describes these benefits and the kind of insured status required for each.) In §§ 404.110 through 404.120 we tell how we determine if you are fully or currently insured. The rules for determining if you are insured for purposes of establishing a period of disability or becoming entitled to disability insurance benefits are in §§ 404.130 through 404.133. Whether you have the required insured status depends on the number of quarters of coverage (QCs) you have acquired.
( b ) *QCs.* This subpart also sets out our rules on crediting you with QCs. QCs are used in determining insured status. In general, you are credited with QCs based on the wages you are paid and the self-employment income you derive during certain periods. (See subpart K of this part for a definition of *wages* and *self-employment income.*) Our rules on how and when you acquire a QC are contained in §§ 404.140 through 404.146.
§ 341.8 Termination of sickness benefits due to a settlement. ( a ) Sickness benefits payable to an eligible employee shall be paid without regard to whether any person or company may be liable for causing the employee's infirmity. However, the Board will terminate the payment of sickness benefits upon receipt of an oral or written report that a settlement or final judgment for the infirmity has been made. A railroad employer may file the required report by sending an electronic message in the manner prescribed by the agency.
( b ) A report of settlement shall be made to the Sickness and Unemployment Benefits Section and shall include the information required in § 341.6. Where the report is an oral report, and the informant is neither the employee nor his or her representative, the informant shall be told that written confirmation containing the information called for by § 341.6 must be submitted to the Board within 5 days from the date of the oral report. A railroad employer may fulfill the written report requirement by sending an electronic message in the manner prescribed by the agency.
( c ) If, in the case of an oral report, the written confirmation as described in paragraph (b) of this section is not received within five days, the Sickness and Unemployment Benefits Section shall take steps within five additional working days to verify whether there has been a settlement or final judgment. If there has been no settlement or final judgment, the payment of sickness benefits shall be reinstated.
( d ) Within five days of the notification of a settlement or final judgment, the Board shall inform the employee of the report of the settlement or final judgment. The notice to the employee shall state how the employee may inform the Board that there has not been a settlement or final judgment. If the employee states that there has not been a settlement or final judgment, the adjudicating office shall, within 10 days after the receipt of such a statement, make a determination as to the employee's rights to future sickness benefits and shall notify him or her accordingly.
( e ) An employee shall have the right to appeal from the determination of the amount of sickness benefits recoverable from the settlement or judgment.
An employee shall also have the right to appeal the termination of his or her sickness benefits after the report of a settlement or final judgment made in accordance with the procedures provided in paragraphs (b), (c) and (d) of this section. Such appeals shall be filed and processed in accordance with part 320 of these regulations. [49 FR 570, Jan. 5, 1984, as amended at 71 FR 53005, Sept. 8, 2006]
### §2151t–1. Establishment of program

#### (a) In general

In carrying out part I of the Foreign Assistance Act of 1961 [22 U.S.C. 2151 et seq.] and other relevant foreign assistance laws, the President, acting through the Administrator of the United States Agency for International Development, shall establish a program of training and other technical assistance to assist foreign countries in—

(1) developing and strengthening laws and regulations to protect intellectual property; and

(2) developing the infrastructure necessary to implement and enforce such laws and regulations.

#### (b) Participation of other agencies

The Administrator of the United States Agency for International Development—

(1) shall utilize the expertise of the Patent and Trademark Office and other agencies of the United States Government in designing and implementing the program of assistance provided for in this section;

(2) shall coordinate assistance under this section with efforts of other agencies of the United States Government to increase international protection of intellectual property, including implementation of international agreements containing high levels of protection of intellectual property; and

(3) shall consult with the heads of such other agencies in determining which foreign countries will receive assistance under this section.

(Pub. L. 103–392, title V, §501, Oct. 22, 1994, 108 Stat. 4103.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

The Foreign Assistance Act of 1961, referred to in subsec. (a), is Pub. L. 87–195, Sept. 4, 1961, 75 Stat. 424. Part I of the Act is classified generally to subchapter I (§2151 et seq.) of this chapter. For provisions deeming references to subchapter I to include parts IV (§2346 et seq.), VI (§2348 et seq.), and VIII (§2349aa et seq.) of subchapter II of this chapter, see section 202(b) of Pub. L. 92–226, set out as a note under section 2346 of this title, and sections 2348c and 2349aa–5 of this title. For complete classification of this Act to the Code, see Short Title note set out under section 2151 of this title and Tables.

#### Codification

Section was enacted as part of the Jobs Through Trade Expansion Act of 1994, and not as part of the Foreign Assistance Act of 1961 which comprises this chapter.
§ 355.6 Prerequisites for issuing a complaint. ( a ) The reviewing official may issue a complaint under § 355.7 only if— ( 1 ) The Department of Justice approves the issuance of a complaint in a written statement described in 31 U.S.C. 3803(b)(1), and
( 2 ) In the case of allegations of liability under § 355.3(a) with respect to a claim, the reviewing official determines that, with respect to such claim or a group of related claims submitted at the same time such claim is submitted (as defined in paragraph (b) of this section), the amount of money or the value of property or services demanded or requested in violation of § 355.3(a) does not exceed $150,000.
( b ) For the purposes of this section, a related group of claims submitted at the same time shall include only those claims arising from the same transaction (*e.g.,* grant, loan, application, or contract) that are submitted simultaneously as part of a single request, demand, or submission.
( c ) Nothing in this section shall be construed to limit the reviewing official's authority to join in a single complaint against a person, claims that are unrelated or were not submitted simultaneously, regardless of the amount of money or the value of property or services demanded or requested.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY HIGH

 322

 322

 296

 296

 298

 308

 315

 330

 346

 351

 331

 350

 403

 366

 367

 334

 321

 338

 2,580

 1,507

 547

 1,411

 592

 390

 326

 291

 266

 247

 249

 249

 244

 280

 280

 250

 283

 287

 289

 285

 284

 284

 284

 284

 287

 290

 293

 294

 305

 305

 303

 320

 332

 330

 355

 338

 309

 284

 255

 220

 211

 207

 216

 217

 295

 291

 276

 290

 292

 294

 294

 293

 296

 297

 298

 304

 310

 302

 319

 319

 312

 313

 706

 603

 396

 630

 432

 342

 297

 273

 243

 229

 228

 231

 229

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

MARCH 2005 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: April 26, 2005

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

PITTSBURG TOP ON THE SACRAMENTO RIVER
LNR
 Partners,
        Inc.





March
      13,
      2006








LaSalle
      Bank, N.A.


135
      S.
      LaSalle Street, Suite 1625


Chicago,
      IL 60603


Attention:  Kathryn
      Hawkinson





Re: Annual
      Independent Public Accountant’s Servicing Report


Pooling
      and Servicing Agreement


Structured
      Asset Securities Corporation II, Commercial Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates,
      LB-UBS Commercial Mortgage Trust 2005-C2





To
      Whom
      It May Concern:





As
      of and
      for the year ended December 31, 2005, LNR Partners, Inc. has complied in all
      material respects with the applicable minimum servicing standards set forth
      in
      the Mortgage Bankers Association of America’s Uniform Single Attestation Program
      for Mortgage Bankers applicable to the commercial and multifamily mortgages
      for
      the Special Servicer as noted in the attachment to this assertion. As of and
      for
      this same period, LNR Partners, Inc. had in effect a fidelity bond in the amount
      of $10,000,000 and an errors and omissions policy in the amount of
      $10,000,000.





Sincerely,





LNR
      PARTNERS, INC.





/s/
        Susan K. Chapman


Susan
      K.
      Chapman


Vice
      President








cc: Wells
      Fargo Bank, N.A.


45
      Freemont Street, 2nd Floor


San
      Francisco, CA 94105


Commercial
      Mortgage Servicing
Exhibit 21.1

Subsidiaries of the Company



|                                         |  |             
|---------------------------------------- |  | ------------
|Entity                                   |  | Jurisdiction
|Ruths Chris Steak House Franchise, Inc. |  | Louisiana   
|                                         | 
|R.F., Inc.                               |  | Louisiana   
|                                         | 
|R.C. Equipment, Inc.                     |  | Louisiana   
|                                         | 
|RCSH Promotions, LLC                     |  | Louisiana   
|                                         | 
|RCSH Management, Inc.                    |  | Louisiana   
|                                         | 
|RCSH Holdings, Inc.                      |  | Louisiana   
|                                         | 
|RCSH Millwork, LLC                       |  | Florida     
|                                         | 
|RCSH Operations, LLC                     |  | Louisiana   
|                                         | 
|RCSH Operations, Inc.                    |  | California  
|                                         | 
|Ruths Chris Steak House #15, Inc.       |  | Louisiana   
|                                         | 
|Ruths Chris Steak House Texas, L.P.     |  | Texas       
|                                         | 
|Ruths Chris Steak House Dallas, L.P.    |  | Texas       
|                                         | 
|Ruths Chris Steak House Boston, LLC     |  | Louisiana   
|                                         | 
|RCSH Utah, Inc.                          |  | Utah        
|                                         | 
|RHG Kingfish, LLC                        |  | Florida     
|                                         | 
|RHG Fish Market, Inc.                    |  | Florida     
|                                         | 
|MFM Winter Park, LLC                     |  | Florida