alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
### §7246. Authorization of appropriations

There are authorized to be appropriated to carry out this part $10,000,000 for each of fiscal years 2017 through 2020.

(Pub. L. 89–10, title IV, §4506, as added Pub. L. 114–95, title IV, §4501, Dec. 10, 2015, 129 Stat. 2020.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Prior Provisions

Prior sections 7247 and 7249 were repealed by Pub. L. 114–95, §5, title IV, §4001(b)(1)(C), Dec. 10, 2015, 129 Stat. 1806, 1967, effective Dec. 10, 2015, except with respect to certain noncompetitive programs and competitive programs.

Section 7247, Pub. L. 89–10, title V, §5431, as added Pub. L. 107–110, title V, §501, Jan. 8, 2002, 115 Stat. 1817, related to partnerships in character education program.

Section 7249, Pub. L. 89–10, title V, §5441, as added Pub. L. 107–110, title V, §501, Jan. 8, 2002, 115 Stat. 1823, related to smaller learning communities.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date

Section effective Dec. 10, 2015, except with respect to certain noncompetitive programs and competitive programs, see section 5 of Pub. L. 114–95, set out as an Effective Date of 2015 Amendment note under section 6301 of this title.
#### § 361.9 Exception to requirement that a hearing be offered.

When an employee is overpaid due to the hours worked reported on the payroll exceeding the actual hours worked, no pre-offset hearing must be granted since in such cases there is no question regarding credibility and veracity. In these cases the Board will make its determination under this part based upon review of the written record.
United States Court of Appeals

For the Eighth Circuit

___________________________

No. 17-3021

___________________________

Ambrose Lewis Champagne

lllllllllllllllllllllPetitioner - Appellant

v.

United States of America

lllllllllllllllllllllRespondent - Appellee

____________

Appeal from United States District Court 

for the District of North Dakota - Bismarck

____________

Submitted: October 19, 2018

Filed: February 8, 2019

[Unpublished]

____________

Before WOLLMAN, ARNOLD, and BENTON, Circuit Judges.

____________

PER CURIAM. 

Ambrose Lewis Champagne appeals the district court’s denial of his successive

28 U.S.C. § 2255 petition. Champagne challenged his sentencing enhancement under

the Armed Career Criminal Act (ACCA), 18 U.S.C. § 924(e), after Johnson v. United

States, 135 S. Ct. 2551 (2015), retroactively invalidated the ACCA’s residual clause. 

The district court denied the petition because it determined that Champagne’s
convictions constituted crimes of violence under either the force or enumeratedoffense clauses of the ACCA. In its denial, the court stated that Champagne could

“rely on the new rule of constitutional law announced in Johnson if his sentence may

have been predicated on the now void residual clause.” In Walker v. United States,

900 F.3d 1012 (2018), however, we subsequently announced that a petitioner may

seek successive § 2255 relief under Johnson only if he can show by a preponderance

of the evidence that the residual clause of the ACCA provided the basis for his ACCA

enhancement. Because this issue is a question of fact, we remanded for the district

court to make such a determination. Id. at 1015. 

Neither the district court here nor Champagne’s original sentencing court

determined whether the ACCA’s residual clause provided the basis for Champagne’s

enhancement. We thus vacate the district court’s order denying Champagne’s petition

and remand for the district court to determine whether Champagne has shown by a

preponderance of the evidence that his successive § 2255 claim relies on Johnson’s

new rule invalidating the residual clause. As we noted in Walker, if the record and

evidentiary hearing are inconclusive, the district court may consider the “relevant

background legal environment at the time of . . . sentencing.” Id. at 1015 (alteration

in original) (quoting United States v. Washington, 890 F.3d 891, 896 (10th Cir.

2018)). If it is equally likely that the sentencing court relied on the force or

enumerated offense clauses, Champagne will have failed to meet his burden to show

that the enhancement was predicated on the residual clause. Id.

______________________________

-2-
Exhibit 32SECTION 1350 CERTIFICATIONEach of the undersigned, S.W. Yong, President and Chief Executive Officer of Trio-TechInternational, a California corporation (the “Company”), and Victor H.M. Ting, Vice President andChief Financial Officer of the Company, do hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 asadopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of hisknowledge (1) the quarterly report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the three months and six monthsended December 31, 2007, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof(the “Report”), fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934, as amended, and (2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents,in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.         /s/ S. W. YONG   Name:  S. W. Yong   Title:  President and Chief Executive Officer   Dated:  February 12, 2008       /s/ VICTOR H. M. TING   Name:  Victor H.M. Ting   Title:  Vice President and Chief Financial Officer   Dated:  February 12, 2008   A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other documentauthenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed formwithin the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been providedto the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and ExchangeCommission or its staff upon request.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY HIGH

 13,330

 14,406

 14,593

 13,340

 15,074

 15,540

 16,596

 16,715

 15,370

 15,353

 15,658

 15,446

 15,970

 16,166

 15,193

 16,412

 16,399

 18,762

 19,444

 18,718

 20,232

 19,265

 19,185

 17,929

 17,882

 14,331

 15,612

 15,587

 15,483

 16,078

 16,163

 7,576

 7,571

 7,721

 6,080

 7,571

 5,312

 7,852

 8,110

 7,443

 6,212

 5,968

 5,907

 6,594

 6,972

 7,744

 7,526

 8,790

 9,060

 8,731

 8,129

 9,380

 9,084

 7,491

 8,206

 8,184

 7,323

 7,891

 8,560

 8,211

 8,781

 8,788

 10,344

 10,879

 11,003

 10,134

 10,613

 9,769

 11,822

 11,922

 10,598

 10,518

 10,574

 10,423

 11,149

 10,950

 11,519

 11,633

 12,603

 13,297

 13,283

 13,129

 13,945

 13,932

 12,838

 13,165

 12,818

 10,680

 10,656

 12,587

 12,363

 12,854

 12,670

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

OCTOBER 2020 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: December 8, 2020

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

PITTSBURG TOP ON THE SACRAMENTO RIVER
§ 404.1205 Absolute coverage groups. ( a ) *General.* An absolute coverage group is a permanent grouping of employees, e.g., all the employees of a city or town. It is a coverage group for coverage and reporting purposes. When used for coverage purposes, the term refers to groups of employees whose positions are not under a retirement system. An absolute coverage group may include positions which were formerly under a retirement system and, at the State's option, employees who are in positions under a retirement system but who are ineligible (see § 404.1208) to become members of that system.
( b ) *What an absolute coverage group consists of.* An absolute coverage group consists of one of the following employee groups: ( 1 ) State employees performing services in connection with the State's governmental functions;
( 2 ) State employees performing services in connection with a single proprietary function of the State;
( 3 ) Employees of a State's political subdivision performing services in connection with that subdivision's governmental functions;
( 4 ) Employees of a State's political subdivision performing services in connection with a single proprietary function of the subdivision;
( 5 ) Civilian employees of a State's National Guard units; and
( 6 ) Individuals employed under an agreement between a State and the U.S. Department of Agriculture as agricultural products inspectors.
( c ) *Designated coverage groups.* A State may provide coverage for designated (*i.e.*, selected) absolute coverage groups of the State or a political subdivision. When coverage is extended to these designated groups, the State must specifically identify each group as a designated absolute coverage group and furnish the effective date of coverage and any optional exclusion(s) for each group. Where a State has provided coverage to designated absolute coverage groups, the State may, by modifying its agreement, extend that coverage to any absolute coverage group in the State.
Exhibit 99.13




                       GE CAPITAL MORTGAGE SERVICES, INC.
            OFFICERS' ANNUAL COMPLIANCE CERTIFICATE - SERIES 1997-HE3


         The undersigned,  Vice Presidents of GE Capital Mortgage Services, Inc.
(the "Servicer"), pursuant to the Pooling and Servicing Agreement for the Series
1997-HE3 Home Equity Loan Pass-Through  Certificates  (the "Agreement")  entered
into by GE Capital  Mortgage  Services,  Inc., as Seller and  Servicer,  and The
First National Bank of Chicago,  as Trustee,  which Agreement requires an annual
statement of compliance to be made to the Trustee by an officer of the Servicer,
hereby state that:

     (i)  a review  of the  activities  of the  Servicer  during  the  preceding
          calendar year and of its performance under the Agreement has been made
          under the undersigned officers' supervision; and

     (ii) to the  best of the  undersigned  officers'  knowledge,  based on such
          review, (1) the Servicer has fulfilled all of its material obligations
          under  the  Agreement  throughout  such  year,  except as set forth on
          Exhibit A hereto, and (2) no Trigger Event has occurred.

Capitalized  terms used  herein but not  defined  herein  shall have the meaning
given to them in the Agreement.


Dated:            March 25, 1998




By       /s/ Gregory A. Gibson
------------------------------
         Gregory A. Gibson
         Vice President


By:      /s/ Karen Pickett
--------------------------
         Karen Pickett
         Vice President



<PAGE>



                                    EXHIBIT A


         Flood Insurance.  There may be instances in which mortgage loans in the
CompanyOs   servicing  portfolio  which  did  not  require  flood  insurance  at
origination  were  subsequently  included  within  special flood hazard areas as
designated by the Federal  Emergency  Management  Agency and flood  insurance on
such mortgage loans may not yet be in place. The Company,  however, has arranged
for back-up flood insurance  coverage in the event of a flood loss relating to a
mortgaged  property  located in a special  flood  hazard  area.  The  Company is
continuing  a  remapping  effort  which  will  identify  mortgage  loans  in its
servicing  portfolio  which  may  now be (but  which  were  not at  origination)
included in special flood hazard  areas.  The Company is not aware of any losses
associated with the lack of flood insurance coverage on such mortgage loans.
### SUBCHAPTER IV—GENERAL, ADMINISTRATIVE, AND MISCELLANEOUS PROVISIONS
**CERTIFICATIONS**     I, Michael K. Farrell, President of MetLife Insurance Company of Connecticut, certifythat:     1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of MetLife Insurance Company ofConnecticut;     2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material factor omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of thecircumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this report;     3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information includedin this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results ofoperations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;     4. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have: a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosurecontrols and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that materialinformation relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, ismade known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period inwhich this report is being prepared;  b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls andprocedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of thedisclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this reportbased on such evaluation; and  c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter(the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that hasmaterially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’sinternal control over financial reporting; and     5. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the auditcommittee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions): a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operationof internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adverselyaffect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financialinformation; and  b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employeeswho have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting.Date:August 11, 2006      /s/Michael K. Farrell   Michael K. Farrell    *President*
### §813. Treatment of controlled substance analogues

#### (a) In general

A controlled substance analogue shall, to the extent intended for human consumption, be treated, for the purposes of any Federal law as a controlled substance in schedule I.

#### (b) Determination

In determining whether a controlled substance analogue was intended for human consumption under subsection (a), the following factors may be considered, along with any other relevant factors:

(1) The marketing, advertising, and labeling of the substance.

(2) The known efficacy or usefulness of the substance for the marketed, advertised, or labeled purpose.

(3) The difference between the price at which the substance is sold and the price at which the substance it is purported to be or advertised as is normally sold.

(4) The diversion of the substance from legitimate channels and the clandestine importation, manufacture, or distribution of the substance.

(5) Whether the defendant knew or should have known the substance was intended to be consumed by injection, inhalation, ingestion, or any other immediate means.

(6) Any controlled substance analogue that is manufactured, formulated, sold, distributed, or marketed with the intent to avoid the provisions of existing drug laws.

#### (c) Limitation

For purposes of this section, evidence that a substance was not marketed, advertised, or labeled for human consumption, by itself, shall not be sufficient to establish that the substance was not intended for human consumption.

(Pub. L. 91–513, title II, §203, as added Pub. L. 99–570, title I, §1202, Oct. 27, 1986, 100 Stat. 3207–13; amended Pub. L. 100–690, title VI, §6470(c), Nov. 18, 1988, 102 Stat. 4378; Pub. L. 115–271, title III, §3241, Oct. 24, 2018, 132 Stat. 3950.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

Schedule I, referred to in subsec. (a), is set out in section 812(c) of this title.

#### Amendments

2018—Pub. L. 115–271 designated existing provisions as subsec. (a), inserted heading, and added subsecs. (b) and (c).

1988—Pub. L. 100–690 substituted "any Federal law" for "this subchapter and subchapter II of this chapter".
-79 -78 -77 -76 -75

 38

 39

 40

★

▲

▲

▲

▲

★

▲

▲

▲ ▲

 500

 1000

 1500

 1000

18 12 06 00

07/19

NOAA HYSPLIT MODEL

 Backward trajectory ending at 2300 UTC 19 Jul 06

 EDAS Meteorological Data

Source

★ at 38.86 N 77.06 W Meters AGL
#### § 404.356 Who is the insured's legally adopted child?

You may be eligible for benefits as the insured's child if you were legally adopted by the insured. If you were legally adopted after the insured's death by his or her surviving spouse you may also be considered the insured's legally adopted child. We apply the adoption laws of the State or foreign country where the adoption took place, not the State inheritance laws described in § 404.355, to determine whether you are the insured's legally adopted child.

[44 FR 34481, June 15, 1979, as amended at 63 FR 57594, Oct. 28, 1998]
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY HIGH

 19,275

 19,670

 18,234

 18,714

 18,793

 20,956

 23,443

 23,517

 22,735

 21,352

 18,868

 20,724

 21,731

 20,677

 19,673

 20,920

 22,494

 22,623

 22,939

 22,180

 23,792

 24,318

 22,145

 21,450

 20,294

 19,273

 19,001

 19,263

 18,202

 19,648

 17,369

 10,008

 10,868

 10,870

 11,624

 12,583

 12,554

 13,083

 12,890

 12,677

 10,843

 11,467

 11,053

 10,401

 11,486

 11,577

 13,159

 14,569

 14,731

 14,020

 13,268

 12,932

 14,367

 14,467

 13,506

 13,148

 11,354

 11,399

 11,753

 9,828

 10,017

 8,889

 14,727

 15,124

 15,194

 15,957

 16,129

 16,774

 18,525

 18,362

 17,474

 16,235

 16,333

 15,946

 16,271

 16,427

 16,244

 17,096

 18,480

 18,952

 18,561

 18,239

 18,788

 18,320

 19,389

 18,150

 17,176

 15,803

 14,921

 14,916

 14,564

 15,074

 13,118

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

OCTOBER 2020 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: December 8, 2020

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

PORT CHICAGO TOP IN SUISUN BAY
p.1 

OAR Box 1384 

Prepped by Charmelle Mathews 

Document Number: 

122) ll-E-82 

Docket Number: 

A-94-52 

Printed 7/2/2008 8:42:07 AM Sheet 122 of 264 
0'4/02/98 15:07 B18Jfl»4A0«3« PES RTP NC NO.627 P. r 

P.2 

A 94 52 

Contact Report 

From: Greg LaFlam and Melanie Proctor. 

Pacific Environmental Services, Inc. (PES) 

Date: October 30,1996 and April 2,1998 

Contact: Mr. Jeff Price, Health, Safety, and Environmental 

Company: Shakespeare Electronics and Fiberglass Division, Newberry, SC 

Telephone Number: (803)276-5504 ,-r______^-^_~-^----:-~

:

-^~1 

Fax Number: (803)276-8940. 1 ' r : I j —— -. \\ mn^ 1 —: 

Contact Summary: \^-^f^^_J 

Shakespeare manufactures products using two types of resins in two different fabrication 

processes. In their filament winding process, cither epoxy resin (military antennas, fishing rod 

blanks) or polyester resin (light poles) is used to make the products. The pultrusion process uses 

polyester resin for a variety of "special projects." The polyester resin has a 33 percent by weight 

styrene content, and the resin mixture contains 10 to 12 percent by weight filler. 

Resin is mixed at two mixing stations, each lnving three mixers. The older station (at 

which epoxy is mixed) utilizes "homemade" covers on the mixers, which have approximately 50 

percent open area. The newer station (mixing polyesters) is fully automated through use of a 

control panel, with resin, fillers, etc. stored in bulk and metered into completely sealed mixers. 

Clarification based on April 2,1998 contact report with Melanie Proctor (PES) 

Ms. Proctor explained that the purpose of this phone call was to determine if; 

Shakespeare's mixers are actively vented. Mr. Price explained that Shakespeare vents their mix 

room, but the individual mixing vessels are not actively vented. 

INFORMATION IS ACCURATE
### §§8291 to 8297. Repealed. Pub. L. 107–110, title X, §1011(5)(A), Jan. 8, 2002, 115 Stat. 1986

Section 8291, Pub. L. 89–10, title X, §10972, as added Pub. L. 106–554, §1(a)(1) [title IX, §901], Dec. 21, 2000, 114 Stat. 2763, 2763A–89, set out purpose of this subpart.

A prior section 8291, Pub. L. 89–10, title X, §10971, as added Pub. L. 103–382, title I, §101, Oct. 20, 1994, 108 Stat. 3852, set out findings, prior to the general amendment of this subpart by Pub. L. 106–554.

Section 8292, Pub. L. 89–10, title X, §10973, as added Pub. L. 106–554, §1(a)(1) [title IX, §901], Dec. 21, 2000, 114 Stat. 2763, 2763A–89, authorized appropriations.

A prior section 8292, Pub. L. 89–10, title X, §10972, as added Pub. L. 103–382, title I, §101, Oct. 20, 1994, 108 Stat. 3853, related to the purpose of this subpart, prior to the general amendment of this subpart by Pub. L. 106–554.

Section 8293, Pub. L. 89–10, title X, §10974, as added Pub. L. 106–554, §1(a)(1) [title IX, §901], Dec. 21, 2000, 114 Stat. 2763, 2763A–89, authorized formula grant program.

A prior section 8293, Pub. L. 89–10, title X, §10973, as added Pub. L. 103–382, title I, §101, Oct. 20, 1994, 108 Stat. 3854, authorized rural school grants, prior to the general amendment of this subpart by Pub. L. 106–554.

Section 8294, Pub. L. 89–10, title X, §10975, as added Pub. L. 106–554, §1(a)(1) [title IX, §901], Dec. 21, 2000, 114 Stat. 2763, 2763A–90, authorized competitive grant program.

A prior section 8294, Pub. L. 89–10, title X, §10974, as added Pub. L. 103–382, title I, §101, Oct. 20, 1994, 108 Stat. 3854, related to fund usage, prior to the general amendment of this subpart by Pub. L. 106–554.

Section 8295, Pub. L. 89–10, title X, §10976, as added Pub. L. 106–554, §1(a)(1) [title IX, §901], Dec. 21, 2000, 114 Stat. 2763, 2763A–91, related to accountability.

A prior section 8295, Pub. L. 89–10, title X, §10975, as added Pub. L. 103–382, title I, §101, Oct. 20, 1994, 108 Stat. 3857, related to higher education grants, prior to the general amendment of this subpart by Pub. L. 106–554.

Section 8296, Pub. L. 89–10, title X, §10977, as added Pub. L. 106–554, §1(a)(1) [title IX, §901], Dec. 21, 2000, 114 Stat. 2763, 2763A–92, related to ratable reductions in case of insufficient appropriations.

Section 8297, Pub. L. 89–10, title X, §10978, as added Pub. L. 106–554, §1(a)(1) [title IX, §901], Dec. 21, 2000, 114 Stat. 2763, 2763A–92, related to applicability of former sections 8271 and 8272 of this title.
In the Senate of the United States, 

December 10 (legislative day, December 9), 2016. 

Resolved, That the bill from the House of Representatives (H.R. 3842) entitled ‘‘An Act to improve homeland security, including domestic preparedness and response to terrorism, by reforming Federal Law Enforcement Training 

Centers to provide training to first responders, and for other 

purposes.’’, do pass with the following 

AMENDMENTS: 

1 Ω1æOn page 3, line 19, insert ‘‘delegated’’ after ‘‘carry 

2 out’’. 

3 Ω2æOn page 4, strike lines 5 through 12 and insert the 

4 following: 

5 ‘‘(B) maximizes opportunities for small 

6 business participation; 
2 

† HR 3842 EAS 

1 Ω3æOn page 11, beginning on line 25, strike ‘‘and to com2 pensate such employees for time spent traveling from their 

3 homes to work sites’’. 

Attest: 

Secretary. 

114TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H.R. 3842 

AMENDMENTS