alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 8.1
 List of Subsidiaries of SK Telecom Co., Ltd.
(As of December 31, 2010)
 Subsidiary Name
    
    Jurisdiction of IncorporationSK Broadband Co., Ltd.
    
    KoreaSK Communications Co., Ltd.
    
    KoreaSK Telink Co., Ltd.
    
    KoreaPS&Marketing Corporation
    
    KoreaPAXNet Co., Ltd.
    
    KoreaF&U Credit information Co., Ltd.
    
    KoreaLoen Entertainment, Inc.
    
    KoreaNtreev Soft Co., Ltd.
    
    KoreaCommerce Planet Co., Ltd.
    
    KoreaStonebridge Cinema Fund
    
    KoreaSK i-media Co., Ltd.
    
    KoreaBroadband
D&M Co., Ltd.
    
    KoreaBroadband Media Co., Ltd.
    
    KoreaBroadband CS Co., Ltd.
    
    KoreaService Ace Co., Ltd.
    
    KoreaService Top Co., Ltd.
    
    KoreaNetwork O&S Co., Ltd.
    
    KoreaK-net Culture and Contents Venture Fund
    
    Korea2nd Benex Focus Investment Fund
    
    KoreaBenex Movie Expert Fund
    
    KoreaOpen Innovation Fund
    
    KoreaBenex Sector Limited Partnership IV
    
    KoreaBMC Digital Culture and Contents Fund
    
    KoreaThe Contents Com Co., Ltd.
    
    KoreaPREGM Co., Ltd.
    
    KoreaSK Telecom China Holdings Co., Ltd.
    
    ChinaSky Property Mgmt., Ltd.
    
    British Virgin IslandsShenzhen E-eye High Tech Co., Ltd.
    
    ChinaSKT Vietnam PTE., Ltd.
    
    SingaporeSKT Americas, Inc.
    
    United StatesSK Telecom Global Investment B.V
    
    The NetherlandsTechnology Venture Fund, LP
    
    United StatesYTK Investment Ltd
    
    Cayman IslandsSK Technology Innovation Company
    
    Cayman Islands
Exhibit 31

                         CERTIFICATION TO BE PROVIDED BY
                       NEW CENTURY MORTGAGE SECURITIES LLC
                                 WITH FORM 10-K


      I, Kevin Cloyd, certify that:

            1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K, and all reports
on Form 8-K containing distribution or servicing reports filed in respect of
periods included in the year covered by this annual report, of New Century Home
Equity Loan Trust 2005-2, Asset Backed Notes, Series 2005-2;

            2. Based on my knowledge, the information in these reports, taken as
a whole, does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to
state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the
circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading as of the
last day of the period covered by this annual report;

            3. Based on my knowledge, the distribution or servicing information
required to be provided to the trustee by the servicer under the pooling and
servicing, or similar, agreement, for inclusion in these reports is included in
these reports;

            4. Based on my knowledge and upon the annual compliance statement
included in the report and required to be delivered to the trustee in accordance
with the terms of the pooling and servicing, or similar, agreement, and except
as disclosed in the reports, the servicer has fulfilled its obligations under
the servicing agreement; and

            5. The reports disclose all significant deficiencies relating to the
servicer's compliance with the minimum servicing standards based upon the report
provided by an independent public accountant, after conducting a review in
compliance with the Uniform Single Attestation Program for Mortgage Bankers or
similar procedure, as set forth in the pooling and servicing, or similar,
agreement, that is included in these reports.

            In giving the certifications above, I have reasonably relied on
information provided to me by the following unaffiliated parties: Deutsche Bank
National Trust Company.


                                        NEW CENTURY MORTGAGE SECURITIES LLC


                                        By: /s/ Kevin Cloyd
                                            ------------------------------------
                                        Name: Kevin Cloyd
                                        Title: President
                                        Date: 3/29/06
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 10-6167

BRANDON L. LEWIS,

Petitioner - Appellant,

v.

GENE M. JOHNSON, Director of the Virginia Department of 

Corrections,

Respondent - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern 

District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Raymond A. Jackson, District 

Judge. (2:09-cv-00259-RAJ-JEB)

Submitted: May 20, 2010 Decided: May 27, 2010

Before WILKINSON, NIEMEYER, and DAVIS, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Brandon L. Lewis, Appellant Pro Se. Alice Theresa Armstrong, 

OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF VIRGINIA, Richmond, Virginia, 

for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Brandon L. Lewis seeks to appeal the district court’s 

order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and 

denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (2006) petition. The 

order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues 

a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1) (2006). 

A certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a 

substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 

28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2006). When the district court denies 

relief on the merits, a prisoner satisfies this standard by 

demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that the 

district court’s assessment of the constitutional claims is 

debatable or wrong. Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 484 

(2000); see Miller-El v. Cockrell, 537 U.S. 322, 336-38 (2003). 

When the district court denies relief on procedural grounds, the 

prisoner must demonstrate both that the dispositive procedural 

ruling is debatable, and that the petition states a debatable 

claim of the denial of a constitutional right. Slack, 529 U.S. 

at 484-85. We have independently reviewed the record and 

conclude that Lewis has not made the requisite showing. 

Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability, deny leave 

to proceed in forma pauperis, and dismiss the appeal. We 

dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal 
3

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the 

court and argument would not aid the decisional process. 

DISMISSED
EXHIBIT 32.1










Certification Pursuant to


18 U.S.C. Section 1350,


as adopted Pursuant to


Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.





In connection with the quarterly report of Receivable Acquisition & Management Corporation (the “COMPANY”) on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2011 as filed with the SEC on the date hereof (the “REPORT”), I hereby certify, in my capacity as an officer of the Company, for purposes of 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:





(1)
The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.











/s/     Max Khan


By:  Max Khan


Chief Executive Officer,


Chief Financial Officer


DATE:  May 16, 2011
UN PUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 21

- 1266

DEAN STEPPELLO , Plaintiff

- Appellant ,

v. JOHN DOE CAPTAIN, FCI Butner 2; JOHN DOE WARDEN, FCI BUTNER, Complex Warden; HEALTH ADMINISTRATOR; LT. SHAW, FCI 1; SAI MOORE; MS. DANIELS, Health Administrator ’ s Assistant; JOHN DOE, White Male; JOHN DOE, Warden FCI 2; JOHN DOE, Warden FCI 1; JOHN DOE, Captain FCI 1 , Defendants

- Appellees

.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District o f North Carolina , at Raleigh

. Louise W. Flanagan , District Judge. ( 5:20

- ct

- 03238

- FL )

Submitted : August 19, 2021 Decided: August 23, 2021

Before GREGORY, Chief Judge, FLOYD , and RUSHING , Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by un published per curiam opinion

.
Dean Steppello , Appellant Pro Se

.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM: Dean Steppello seeks to appeal the district court’s order noting deficiencies in his complaint filed pursuant to Bivens v. Six U nknown Named Agents of Federal Bureau of
Narcotics , 403 U.S. 388 (1971) , and the Federal Tort Claims Act , 28 U.S.C §§ 134 6 (b)(1),
2671

- 2680, and directing him to file an amended complaint

. This court may exercise jurisdiction only over final orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and certain interlocutory and collateral orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1292; Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(b); Cohen v. Beneficial Indus. Loan Corp. , 337 U.S. 541, 545

- 46 (1949). The order Steppell o seeks to appeal is neither a final order nor an appealable interlocutory or collateral order. Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction and deny Steppello’s requests for the appointment of counsel
and to transfer his case . We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED
### §1056. Separability

If any provision of this chapter or the application thereof to any person or circumstances is held invalid, the validity of the remainder of the chapter and of the application of such provision to other persons and circumstances shall not be affected thereby.

(Pub. L. 91–597, §28, Dec. 29, 1970, 84 Stat. 1635.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

This chapter, referred to in text, was in the original "this Act", meaning Pub. L. 91–597, Dec. 29, 1970, 84 Stat. 1620, which is classified principally to this chapter. For complete classification of this Act to the Code, see Short Title note set out under section 1031 of this title and Tables.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date

For effective date of this section, see section 29 of Pub. L. 91–597, set out as a note under section 1031 of this title.
# C_2012280EN.01001301.xml

| 15.9.2012 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 280/13 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

15.9.2012

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 280/13

---

Information communicated by Member States regarding closure of fisheries

2012/C 280/10

In accordance with Article 35(3) of Council Regulation (EC) No 1224/2009 of 20 November 2009 establishing a Community control system for ensuring compliance with the rules of the common fisheries policy (1), a decision has been taken to close the fishery as set down in the following table:

1

| Date and time of closure | 10.8.2012 |
| --- | --- |
| Duration | 10.8.2012-31.12.2012 |
| Member State | Belgium |
| Stock or group of stocks | SRX/89-C |
| Species | Skates and rays (rajiformes) |
| Zone | EU waters of VIII and IX |
| Type(s) of fishing vessels | — |
| Reference number | FS27TQ43 |

Date and time of closure

10.8.2012

Duration

10.8.2012-31.12.2012

Member State

Belgium

Stock or group of stocks

SRX/89-C

Species

Skates and rays (rajiformes)

rajiformes

Zone

EU waters of VIII and IX

Type(s) of fishing vessels

—

Reference number

FS27TQ43

---

(1)  OJ L 343, 22.12.2009, p. 1.

1

---
### SUBCHAPTER II—OTHER MATERIALS
#### § 404.923 Expedited appeals process—general.

By using the expedited appeals process you may go directly to a Federal district court without first completing the administrative review process that is generally required before the court will hear your case.
#### § 30.806 What kind of medical evidence must the claimant submit to prove that he or she lost wages due to a covered illness?

OWCP requires the submission of rationalized medical evidence of sufficient probative value to convince the fact-finder that the covered Part E employee experienced a loss in wages in his or her trigger month due to a covered illness, *i.e.,* medical evidence based on a physician's fully explained and reasoned decision (see § 30.805(a)(3)). A loss in wages in the trigger month due solely to non-covered illness matters, such as a reduction in force or voluntary retirement, is not proof of compensable wage-loss under Part E.

[84 FR 3059, Feb. 8, 2019]
#### Lena M. Sears, Respondent, v. Elmer W. Kelley, Appellant.

Judgment modified by deducting from the damages eighty-eight dollars, the value of the boxes, and as so modified unanimously affirmed, without costs.
ICRA CITE Listir.; of Spent PicKle Liqoor (1<062) 51 19320 May 28, 1986, as 

### ameooed SeptedJer 22, .:986 (51 FR 33612)

• FEE£Rl\L RWJIREMENI' 261 -**IomrIFI~TICN** AND LISTIN:; OF K\2'ARIXXJS SUBPf\RI' D - LISTS OF fF\ZARIXXJS W\Sl'E 

### t**~S** W\SI'E FIQ1 SPEX:IFIC SOORCES list of "K" wastes 261.32 )-1-7-3--3-0-3---99-0-4---]
.... _ §261.32

- Hazardous waste from**~ific** sources Industry, and ElJ\ Hazardous Waste No: Hazardoos 

### Waste Hazard Cede 

# • Iran and Steel: 

### xxx K062 .••••...•.•.•. Spent pickle 1iquior generated 

### by steel finishing oper at i ons of 'ircn and steel Lndustry 

### (SIC Cedes 331 and 

### 332) . 

### C,T



# •• May 28, 1986, as amended september 22, 1986 Page 1 of 1
§ 404.1715 Notice or request to a representative. ( a ) We shall send your representative— ( 1 ) Notice and a copy of any administrative action, determination, or decision; and
( 2 ) Requests for information or evidence.
( b ) A notice or request sent to your representative, will have the same force and effect as if it had been sent to you.
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Isidro Gabriel MORALES, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 05-40807.

Conference Calendar.

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.

Decided Feb. 23, 2006.

James Lee Turner, Assistant U.S. Attorney, U.S. Attorney’s Office, Southern District of Texas, Houston, TX, for PlaintiffAppellee.

Marjorie A. Meyers, Federal Public Defender, Laura Fletcher Leavitt, Assistant Federal Public Defender, Federal Public Defender’s Office, Southern District of Texas, Houston, TX, for Defendant-Appellant.

Before GARZA, DENNIS, and PRADO, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: *

Isidro Gabriel Morales appeals his sentence under 8 U.S.C. § 1326(a) and (b) for illegal reentry into the United States after having been deported following conviction for an aggravated felony. Morales asserts that the “felony” and “aggravated felony” provisions of 8 U.S.C. § 1326(b) are facially unconstitutional.

The constitutional issue raised is foreclosed by *Almendarez-Torres v. United States,*523 U.S. 224, 235, 118 S.Ct. 1219, 140 L.Ed.2d 350 (1998). Although Morales contends that *Almendarez-Torres*was incorrectly decided and that majority of the Supreme Court would overrule it in light of *Apprendi v. New Jersey,*530 U.S. 466, 120 S.Ct. 2348, 147 L.Ed.2d 435 (2000), we have repeatedly rejected such arguments on the basis that *Almendarez-Torres*remains binding. *See United States v. Garza-Lopez,*410 F.3d 268, 276 (5th Cir.), *cert. denied,*— U.S.-, 126 S.Ct. 298, 163 L.Ed.2d 260 (2005). Morales properly concedes that his argument is foreclosed in *613light of *Almendarez-Torres*and circuit precedent, but he raises it here to preserve it for further review.

The district court’s judgment is AFFIRMED.

*

 Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.
Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not *

be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 05-30859

Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

Plaintiff-Appellee

v.

CHARLES GILLESPIE

Defendant-Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Western District of Louisiana

USDC No. 5:04-CR-50170-5

Before HIGGINBOTHAM, DENNIS, and PRADO, Circuit Judges. 

PER CURIAM:*

The attorney appointed to represent Charles Gillespie has moved for leave

to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California, 386

U.S. 738 (1967). Gillespie has not filed a response to the Anders motion but did

bring claims of ineffective assistance of counsel to this court’s attention. The

record is insufficiently developed to allow consideration at this time of Gillespie’s

claims of ineffective assistance of counsel; such claims generally “cannot be

resolved on direct appeal when [they have] not been raised before the district

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

F I L E D

February 18, 2009

Charles R. Fulbruge III

Clerk
No. 05-30859

2

court since no opportunity existed to develop the record on the merits of the

allegations.” United States v. Cantwell, 470 F.3d 1087, 1091 (5th Cir. 2006)

(internal quotation marks and citation omitted). Our independent review of the

record and counsel’s brief discloses no nonfrivolous issue for appeal.

Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is

excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED.

See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.
EXHIBIT 31.2
I, Gregory W. Schafer, Chief Financial Officer of IntraBiotics Pharmaceuticals, Inc., certify that:
1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of IntraBiotics Pharmaceuticals, Inc.;
2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material factor omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of thecircumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this report;
3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included inthis report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operationsand cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;
4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:
     a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls andprocedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating tothe registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within thoseentities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;
     b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures andpresented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls andprocedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluations; and
     (c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourthfiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonablylikely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and
5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the auditcommittee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):
     a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internalcontrols over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’sability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and
     b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have asignificant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.   Date: July 20, 2005 /s/ Gregory W. Schafer Gregory W. Schafer  Chief Financial Officer
EXHIBIT 99.1 - ANNUAL FUNDS APPLICATION STATEMENT




                              [LOGO] JPMORGAN


June 30, 2005

    Hartford Life Global Funding Trusts - Annual Funds Application Statement

I, Albert P. Mari, Jr., being a duly appointed officer of JPMorgan Chase Bank,
N.A. ("Indenture Trustee"), do hereby certify on behalf of the Indenture
Trustee, that, with respect to Hartford Life Global Funding Trust 2005-045:





         1. I have reviewed and examined the application by the Indenture
Trustee, during the fiscal year ending June 15, 2005; of trust money collected
by the Indenture Trustee pursuant to Section 5.02 of the Indenture, pursuant to
which the trust's notes (the "Notes") were issued; and

         2. Based upon my review and examination, to the best of my knowledge,
during such fiscal year, the trust money collected by the Indenture Trustee was
properly applied, pursuant to Section 5.02 of the Indenture.

         Nothing herein shall constitute a representation as to the proper
application by the registered holder of the Notes or the trust of the trust
monies received by it.



JPMORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A., as Indenture Trustee
Worldwide Securities Services
4 New York Plaza, 15th Floor
New York, NY 10004


/s/ Albert P. Mari, Jr.


Name:  Albert P. Mari, Jr.
Title: Vice President


<TABLE>
<S><C>
JPMORGAN CHASE BANK o Institutional Trust Services o 4 New York Plaza, Floor 15, New York, NY 10004
</TABLE>
#### 377 Fifth Avenue Corp., Respondent, v. Rebajes, Inc., Appellant.

Order unanimously affirmed, with $20 costs and disbursements, with leave to the defendant to answer within ten days after service of the order, with notice of entry thereof, on payment of said costs. No opinion. Present — Glennon, J. P., Dore, Cohn, Callahan and Van Voorhis, JJ.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY HIGH

 164

 168

 164

 144

 134

 131

 129

 147

 143

 147

 156

 162

 222

 229

 194

 142

 130

 134

 135

 146

 153

 159

 156

 167

 162

 170

 177

 177

 163

 154

 145

 130

 129

 127

 127

 125

 125

 126

 126

 124

 125

 125

 124

 120

 117

 116

 120

 125

 128

 128

 130

 132

 131

 130

 130

 130

 131

 130

 130

 130

 131

 131

 140

 139

 136

 130

 127

 127

 127

 129

 129

 129

 131

 132

 138

 135

 130

 127

 128

 129

 130

 133

 135

 136

 134

 135

 135

 138

 140

 138

 136

 135

 134

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

JULY 2018 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: August 2, 2018

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

RIO VISTA ON THE SACRAMENTO RIVER
### §155. Permits for importation

The Secretary of Agriculture is authorized to issue permits for the importation into the United States of viruses, serums, toxins, and analogous products, for use in the treatment of domestic animals, which are not worthless, contaminated, dangerous, or harmful.

(Mar. 4, 1913, ch. 145, §1 (part), 37 Stat. 833.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

See note set out under section 151 of this title.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Transfer of Functions

For transfer of functions of the Secretary of Agriculture relating to agricultural import and entry inspection activities under this chapter to the Secretary of Homeland Security, and for treatment of related references, see sections 231, 551(d), 552(d), and 557 of Title 6, Domestic Security, and the Department of Homeland Security Reorganization Plan of November 25, 2002, as modified, set out as a note under section 542 of Title 6.
#### Lottie Schwitzer, as Administrator of the Estate of Charles Schwitzer, Deceased, Respondent, v. Delaware, Lackawanna and Western Railroad *819Company, Appellant.

Present — Crosby, P. J., Taylor, Dowling, Harris and MeCurn, JJ.