alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Phillip POTTER, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 05-17218

Non-Argument Calendar.

United States Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit.

July 19, 2006.

Before TJOFLAT, HULL and COX, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

Gwendolyn Spivey, appointed counsel for Phillip Potter in this direct criminal appeal, has moved to withdraw from further representation of the appellant and filed a brief pursuant to *Anders v. California,*386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Our independent review of the entire record reveals that counsel’s assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit, counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and the revocation of Potter’s supervised release and sentence are AFFIRMED.
Exhibit 23.1  Consent
of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm  We consent to the
incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement (Form S-3 No. 333-124601)
of KapStone Paper and Packaging Corporation and in the related Prospectus and
Registration Statement (Form S-8 No. 333-141916) pertaining to the
2006 Incentive Plan of our reports dated March 12, 2008, with respect to
the consolidated financial statements of KapStone Paper and Packaging
Corporation and the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting
of KapStone Paper and Packaging Corporation, included in this Annual Report (Form 10-K)
for the year-ended December 31, 2007.  /s/ Ernst & Young
  LLPErnst & Young LLP  Chicago, Illinois March 12, 2008
#### Nellie Lennan, Suing for Herself as a Preferred Stockholder and for All Other Preferred Stockholders of 551 Fifth Avenue, Inc., Similarly Situated, Respondent, v. Charles N. Blakeley et al., Appellants.

The complaint sufficiently alleges facts which if established may warrant the granting of equitable relief. The allegations indicate that in disregard of the rights of the stockholders the directors are continuing the existence of the corporation for the sole purpose of benefiting those in control of the corporation at the expense of the other stockholders. Order unanimously affirmed, with $20 costs and disbursements, with leave to the defendants to answer within ten days after service of the order, with notice of entry thereof, on payment of said costs. Present — Glennon, J. P., Dore, Cohn, Callahan and Van Voorhis, JJ. [See *post,*p. 846.]
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,  AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of ALCO, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ended March 31, 2007 (the "Report"), I, Andrew Liu, Chief Executive Officer and Chairman of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

> 1) The Report fully complies with the requirement of Section 13(a) or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange
> Act of 1934; and
> 
> 
> 2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the Company's
> financial position and results of operations.

/s/Andrew Liu



Andrew Liu, Chief Executive Officer and Chairman

May 15, 2007
EXHIBIT 32

Certification of CEO and CFO Pursuant to

18 U.S.C.
Section 1350,

As Adopted Pursuant to

Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In connection with the Annual
Report on Form 10-K of Volcom, Inc. (the Company) for the year ended December 31, 2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), Richard R. Woolcott, as Chief Executive Officer
of the Company, and Douglas P. Collier, as Chief Financial Officer of the Company, each hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to his knowledge, that:



|(i) | the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
|--- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|(ii) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
|---- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                                                  
|--------------------------------------------------
|/s/    Richard R.
Woolcott                        
|Richard R. Woolcott                               
|Chairman and Chief Executive                      
|(Principal Executive Officer)                     
|Dated: March 16, 2010                             
|                                                  
|/s/    Douglas P.
Collier                         
|Douglas P. Collier                                
|Executive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer,
|Secretary and Treasurer                           
|(Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)      
|Dated: March 16, 2010                             

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Volcom, Inc. and will be retained by Volcom, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or
its staff upon request.

This certification is being furnished solely to accompany the Report pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, and is
not being filed for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and is not to be incorporated by reference into any filing of the Company, whether made before or after the date hereof, regardless of any general
incorporation language in such filing.
§ 408.1210 What are the essential elements of an administration agreement? ( a ) *Payments.* The agreement must provide that recognition payments can only be made to individuals who are receiving SVB payments.
( b ) *Administrative costs* — ( 1 ) *General rule.* SSA will assess each State that elects Federal administration of its recognition payments an administration fee for administering those payments.
( 2 ) *Determining the administration fee.* The administration fee is assessed and paid monthly and is derived by multiplying the number of State recognition payments we make on behalf of a State for any month in a fiscal year by the applicable dollar rate for the fiscal year. The number of recognition payments we make in a month is the total number of checks we issue, and direct deposits we make, to recipients in that month, that are composed in whole or in part of State recognition funds. The dollar amounts are as follows: ( i ) For fiscal year 2001, $8.10;
( ii ) For fiscal year 2002, $8.50; and
( iii ) For fiscal year 2003 and each succeeding fiscal year— ( A ) The applicable rate in the preceding fiscal year, increased by the percentage, if any, by which the Consumer Price Index for the month of June of the calendar year of the increase exceeds the Consumer Price Index for the month of June of the calendar year preceding the calendar year of the increase, and rounded to the nearest whole cent; or
( B ) A different rate if the Commissioner determines the different rate is appropriate for the State considering the complexity of administering the State's recognition payment program.
( c ) *Agreement period.* The agreement period for a State that has elected Federal administration of its recognition payments extends for one year from the date the agreement was signed unless otherwise designated in the agreement. The agreement will be automatically renewed for a period of one year unless either the State or SSA gives written notice not to renew, at least 90 days before the beginning of the new period. For a State to elect Federal administration of its recognition payment program, it must notify SSA of its intent to enter into an agreement, furnishing the necessary payment specifications, at least 120 days before the first day of the month for which it wishes Federal administration to begin, and have executed such agreement at least 30 days before such day.
( d ) *Modification or termination.* The agreement may be modified at any time by mutual consent. The State or SSA may terminate the agreement upon 90 days' written notice to the other party, provided the effective date of the termination is the last day of a quarter. However, the State may terminate the agreement upon 45 days written notice to SSA if: ( 1 ) The State does not wish to comply with a regulation promulgated by SSA after the execution of the agreement; and
( 2 ) the State provides its written notice within 30 days of the effective date of the regulation. The Commissioner is not precluded from terminating the agreement in less than 90 days if the State has failed to materially comply with the provisions of § 408.1235 on State transfer of funds to SSA.
<PAGE>

                                                                  EXHIBIT 12.3
                                       
                                  PACCAR Inc
                                       
               COMPUTATION OF RATIO OF EARNINGS TO FIXED CHARGES
                    PURSUANT TO SEC REPORTING REQUIREMENTS
                            (Thousands of Dollars)

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>

                                                          Six Months Ended
                                                              June 30
                                                        1998           1997
                                                      --------      --------
<S>                                                   <C>           <C>
FIXED CHARGES
  Interest expense
  PACCAR Inc and Subsidiaries (1)                     $ 79,656      $ 71,500
  Portion of rentals deemed interest                     7,277         3,053
                                                      --------      --------

TOTAL FIXED CHARGES                                   $ 86,933      $ 74,553
                                                      --------      --------
                                                      --------      --------

EARNINGS
  Income before taxes -
    PACCAR Inc and Subsidiaries                       $321,313      $199,485
  Fixed charges                                         86,933        74,553
                                                      --------      --------

EARNINGS AS DEFINED                                   $408,246      $274,038
                                                      --------      --------
                                                      --------      --------

RATIO OF EARNINGS TO FIXED CHARGES                       4.70x         3.68x
</TABLE>


(1) Exclusive of interest, if any, paid to PACCAR Inc.

                                     -13-
Exhibit 32.3


CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


I, Alan Pickerill, Chief Financial Officer of Expedia, Inc. (the “Company”), certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that, to my knowledge:


|   |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                            
|-- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|1) | the Annual Report on Form 10-K/A (Amendment No. 1) of the Company for the year ended December 31, 2017 (the “Report”) which this statement accompanies fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and

|   |                                                                                                                                                     
|-- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|2) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Date: February 14, 2018/s/ ALAN PICKERILLAlan PickerillChief Financial Officer
(No. 6910

#### Aero Ambulance Service, Inc., Claimant, *vs.*State of Illinois, Department of Mental Health, Respondent.

*Opinion filed March*8, *1973.*

Aero Ambulance Service, Inc., Claimant, pro se.

William J. Scott, Attorney General; Saul R. Wexler, Assistant Attorney General, for Respondent.

Per Curiam.
### NUMBER 13 - 20 - 00576 - CR COURT OF APPEALS THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG

RUBEN ECHAVARRIA , Appellant ,
v. THE STATE OF TEXAS , Appellee.
On appeal from the 156th District Court of Bee County , Texas.



## O R D E R
Before Chief J ustice Contreras and Justice s Hinojosa and Silva Order Per Curia m
Appellant, Ruben Echavarria , has filed a notice of appeal with this Court from his conviction in trial court cause number B

- 18

- 2009

- 0

- CR

- B

. The trial court’s certification of the defendant’ s right to appeal shows that the defendant doe s not have the right to appeal. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 25.2(a)(2). The Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure provide that an appeal must be dismissed if a certification showing that a defendant has a right of appea l is not made a part of the record. Id. R. 25 .2(d); see id. R. 37.1, 44.3,2 44.4. The purpose of the certification requirement is to efficiently sort appealable cases from non

- appealable cases so that appealable cases can “move through the system unhinder ed while eliminating, at an early stage, the t ime and expense associated with

non - appealable cases.” Greenwell v. Ct. of Apps. for the Thirteenth Jud. Dist. , 159 S.W.3d 645, 649 (Tex. Crim. App. 2005); see Hargesheimer v. State , 182 S.W.3d 906, 912 (Tex. Crim. App. 2006). Within thirty days of date o f this notice, appellant’s lead appellate counsel, Hon. J o seph Stephens , is hereby ORDERED to: 1) review the record; 2) determine whether appellant has a right to appeal; and 3) forward to this Court, by letter , counsel’s findings as to whether appellant has a right to appeal and/or advise this Court as to the existence of any amended certification. If appellant’s counsel determines that appellant has a right to appeal, counsel is further ORDERED to file a moti on with this Court within thirty days of this notice, identifying and explaining substantive reasons why appellant has a right to appeal. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P

. 44.3, 44.4; Dears v. State , 154 S.W.3d 610, 614

– 15 (Tex. Crim. App. 2005); see also, e.g., Carrol l v. State , 119 S.W.3d 838, 841 (Tex. App.

— San Antonio 2003, no pe t.) (certification form provided in appendix to appellate rules may be modified to reflect that defendant has right of appeal under circumstances not addressed by the form). The motion must include an analysis of the applicable case law, and any factual a llegations therein must be true and supported by the record. See Dears , 154 S.W.3d at 614

– 15; c f. Woods v. State, 108 S.W.3d 314, 316 (Tex. Crim. App. 2003) (construing former appellate rul e 25.2(b)(3) and holding that recitations in the notice of appeal must be true and supported by the record). Copies of record documents necessary to evaluate the alleged error in the certification affecting3 appellant’s right to appeal shall be attached to the motion. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 10.1, 10.2. I T IS SO ORDERED.

PER CURIAM Do not pu blish. T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 47.2( b). Delivered and filed the 4th day of January , 2021

.
### §1523. Repealed. Oct. 26, 1951, ch. 575, title III, §305, 65 Stat. 647

Section, act June 2, 1951, ch. 121, Ch. XIII, §1302(a), 65 Stat. 63, related to assistance denied countries trading with Russia or satellite countries. See section 1611 et seq. of this title. Section 1302(b) of that act repealed section 1304 of act Sept. 27, 1950, ch. 1052, Ch. XIII, 64 Stat. 1066, which contained similar provisions.
### SUBCHAPTER I—ADMINISTRATIVE PROVISIONS
# C_2013271EN.01015101.xml

| 19.9.2013 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 271/151 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

19.9.2013

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 271/151

---

Opinion of the European Economic and Social Committee on the ‘Amended proposal for a directive of the European Parliament and of the Council on the transparency of measures regulating the prices of medicinal products for human use and their inclusion in the scope of public health insurance systems’

COM(2013) 168 final — 2012/0035 (COD)

2013/C 271/29

On 8 April 2013 and 16 April 2013, respectively, the Council and the European Parliament decided to consult the European Economic and Social Committee, under Article 114 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, on the

Amended proposal for a Directive of the European Parliament and of the Council on the transparency of measures regulating the prices of medicinal products for human use and their inclusion in the scope of public health insurance systems

Amended proposal for a Directive of the European Parliament and of the Council on the transparency of measures regulating the prices of medicinal products for human use and their inclusion in the scope of public health insurance systems

COM(2013) 168 final – 2012/0035 (COD).

Since the Committee has already set out its views on the content of the proposal in question in its opinion CESE 1573/2012, adopted on 12 July 2012 (1), it decided, at its 490th plenary session of 22 and 23 May 2013 (meeting of 22 May), by 161 votes to two with five abstentions, not to draw up a new opinion on the subject, but to refer to the position it had taken in the above-mentioned document.

1

Brussels, 22 May 2013.

The President of the European Economic and Social Committee

Henri MALOSSE

---

(1)  EESC opinion on the Proposal for a Directive of the European Parliament and of the Council relating to the transparency of measures regulating the prices of medicinal products for human use and their inclusion in the scope of public health insurance systems, OJ C 299 of 4.10.2012, p. 81.

1

---
#### Joseph Storey et al. v. Macha M. Burns.

Filed February 2, 1898.

No. 7821.

Proceeding's in Equity: Review. A review by petition in error of the proceedings during the trial in the district court of an equity cause cannot be obtained in this court if no motion for a new trial was filed in the trial court; and in a case so presented here, the record will be examined no further than to ascertain whether the pleadings state a cause of action or defense and support the judgment or decree.

Error from f lie district court of Adams comity. Tried below before Beall, J.

*Affirmed.*

*Capps & Stevens,*for plaintiff in error.

*Batty, Dungan é Burton*and ill. *A. 11 artigan, contra.*

Harrison, C. J.

This action was commenced by the defendant in error in the district court of Adams county December 29, 1893, to procure the foreclosure of a real estate mortgage. Issues were joined, and on June 23, 1894, as a result of a trial, the defendant in error was awarded a decree.

The cause is presented to this court by petition in error on behalf of the defendants in the district court. There ivas no motion for a new trial filed for plaintiffs in error in the trial court. It is the rule that to obtain a review in this court by petition in error of the proceedings during the trial of such an action as this a motion for a new trial must be made in the trial court as in a law action. *(Carlow v. Aultman,*28 Neb. 672; *Hansen v. Kinney,*46 Neb. 207.) In an error proceeding to this court, where it appears that no motion for a new trial ivas filed in the district court, no further examination will be made than to ascertain whether the pleadings state a cause of action or defense and support the judgment or decree rendered, *(Hansen v. Kinney, supra.)*The petition in the *536present case states a cause of action and supports the decree. The latter must therefore be

Affirmed.
§ 404.1565 Your work experience as a vocational factor. ( a ) *General. Work experience* means skills and abilities you have acquired through work you have done which show the type of work you may be expected to do. Work you have already been able to do shows the kind of work that you may be expected to do. We consider that your work experience applies when it was done within the last five years, lasted long enough for you to learn to do it, and was substantial gainful activity. We do not usually consider that work you did more than five years before the time we are deciding whether you are disabled (or when the disability insured status requirement was last met, if earlier) applies. A gradual change occurs in most jobs so that after five years it is no longer realistic to expect that skills and abilities acquired in a job done then continue to apply. If you have no work experience or you did work that started and stopped in a period of fewer than 30 calendar days (see § 404.1560(b)(1)(ii)) during the five-year period, we generally consider that these do not apply. If you have acquired skills through your past work, we consider you to have these work skills unless you cannot use them in other skilled or semi-skilled work that you can now do. If you cannot use your skills in other skilled or semi-skilled work, we will consider your work background the same as unskilled. However, even if you have no work experience, we may consider that you are able to do unskilled work because it requires little or no judgment and can be learned in a short period of time.
( b ) *Information about your work.* Under certain circumstances, we will ask you about the work you have done in the past. If you cannot give us all of the information we need, we may try, with your permission, to get it from your employer or other person who knows about your work, such as a member of your family or a co-worker. When we need to consider your work experience to decide whether you are able to do work that is different from what you have done in the past, we will ask you to tell us about all of the jobs you have had in the last five years. You must tell us the dates you worked, all of the duties you did, and any tools, machinery, and equipment you used. We will need to know about the amount of walking, standing, sitting, lifting and carrying you did during the workday, as well as any other physical or mental duties of your job. If all of your work in the past five years has been arduous and unskilled, and you have very little education, we will ask you to tell us about all of your work from the time you first began working. This information could help you to get disability benefits.
[89 FR 27667, Apr. 18, 2024]