alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 9.185 Texoma. ( a ) *Name.* The name of the viticultural area described in this section is “Texoma”. For purposes of part 4 of this chapter, “Texoma” is a term of viticultural significance.
( b ) *Approved Maps.* The appropriate maps for determining the boundaries of the Texoma viticultural area are two United States Geological Survey, 1:250,000 scale, topographic maps. They are titled: ( 1 ) Sherman, Texas; Oklahoma, 1954, revised 1977; and
( 2 ) Texarkana, Tex.; Ark.; Okla.; La., 1953, revised 1972.
( c ) *Boundary.* The Texoma viticultural area is located in Montague, Cooke, Grayson, and Fannin Counties, Texas. The boundary is defined as follows: ( 1 ) The beginning point is the northwest corner of Montague County (at the Red River, which is also the Texas-Oklahoma State line) on the Sherman map. From this point, the boundary line:
( 2 ) Follows the Red River eastward along the Texas-Oklahoma State line, passes onto the Texarkana map, and continues to the northeast corner of Fannin County; then
( 3 ) Continues southward along the eastern Fannin County line to a point approximately three miles west of Petty, Texas, where a power line shown on the Texarkana map crosses the county line; then
( 4 ) Continues southwest in a straight line for approximately 13 miles to the intersection of State Routes 34/50 and State Route 64 at Ladonia, Texas; then
( 5 ) Follows State Route 34 west to its intersection with State Route 68; then
( 6 ) Continues west-southwesterly in a straight line from that intersection to the intersection of U.S. Highway 69 and State Route 78 at Leonard, Texas, on the Sherman map; then
( 7 ) Continues northwest on U.S. Highway 69 for approximately 6 miles to the intersection of U.S. Highway 69 and State Route 121 at Trenton, Texas; then
( 8 ) Continues westerly in a straight line to the intersection of State Routes 160 and 121, and then continues west on State Route 121 to its intersection with U.S. Highway 75 at Van Alstyne, Texas; then
( 9 ) Continues south along U.S. Highway 75 to the Grayson County line; then
( 10 ) Continues west along the southern Grayson County line and then the southern Cooke County line to the county line's intersection with Interstate 35; then
( 11 ) Continues north along Interstate 35 to its intersection with State Route 922 in Valley View, Texas; then
( 12 ) Follows State Route 922 west for approximately 17 miles to Rosston, Texas; then
( 13 ) Continues west-southwest from Rosston in a straight line for approximately 19 miles to the intersection of U.S. Highway 287 and State Route 101 at Sunset, Texas; then
( 14 ) Follows U.S. 287 northwest approximately 17 miles to the western Montague County line; and
( 15 ) Continues north along the western Montague County line to the beginning point at the northwest corner of Montague County.
[T.D. TTB-38, 70 FR 72716, Dec. 7, 2005]
#### § 362.7 Factors to be considered in settling a claim.

Claims are payable only for such types, quantities or amounts of tangible personal property as the Deputy General Counsel of the Board shall determine to be reasonable, useful, or proper under the circumstances existing at the time and place of the loss, theft or damage of the property. In determining what is reasonable, useful or proper the Deputy General Counsel will consider the type and quantity of property involved, the circumstances attending acquisition and use of the property, and whether possession or use by the employee at the time of loss, theft or damage was incident to the employee's service. What is reasonable, useful or proper is a question of fact to be determined by the Deputy General Counsel.

(45 U.S.C. 231f(b)(5))

[45 FR 57709, Aug. 29, 1980, as amended at 48 FR 51448, Nov. 9, 1983]
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY ELEV

 526.71

 526.72

 526.82

 526.79

 526.79

 526.77

 526.78

 526.77

 526.84

 526.80

 526.85

 526.78

 526.73

 526.82

 526.80

 526.75

 526.74

 526.75

 526.70

 526.66

 526.63

 526.59

 526.62

 526.76

 527.22

 527.60

 527.97

 528.43

 528.84

 529.16

 529.50

 303.0

 303.0

 303.3

 303.2

 303.2

 303.2

 303.2

 303.2

 303.4

 303.3

 303.5

 303.2

 303.0

 303.3

 303.3

 303.1

 303.1

 303.1

 302.9

 302.8

 302.7

 302.5

 302.6

 303.1

 304.8

 306.2

 307.5

 309.2

 310.7

 311.9

 313.1

STORAGE

+2.7

+0.0

+0.4

-0.1

+0.0

-0.1

+0.0

+0.0

+0.3

-0.1

+0.2

-0.3

-0.2

+0.3

-0.1

-0.2

+0.0

+0.0

-0.2

-0.1

-0.1

-0.1

+0.1

+0.5

+1.7

+1.4

+1.3

+1.7

+1.5

+1.2

+1.3

CHANGE

1,694

371

539

319

382

352

407

355

480

290

458

271

310

564

360

302

371

410

316

334

359

332

470

657

1,238

1,101

1,090

1,252

1,166

1,004

1,042

INFLOW

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

MADERA

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

SPILL

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

FRIANT-KERN

 1

 2

 7

 7

 3

 9

 10

 8

 2

 10

 1

 8

 1

 1

 6

 13

 9

 2

 7

 7

 13

 5

 16

 3

 0

 5

 12

 4

 9

 9

 8

C.F.S.

 .01

 .02

 .06

 .06

 .03

 .08

 .09

 .07

 .02

 .09

 .01

 .07

 .01

 .01

 .05

 .11

 .08

 .02

 .06

 .06

 .11

 .04

 .14

 .03

 .00

 .04

 .10

 .03

 .08

 .08

 .07

INCHES

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .32

 .21

 .00

 .00

 .02

 .01

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .04

 .06

 .02

 .05

 .01

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

PRECIP

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

JANUARY 2013 MILLERTON LAKE DAILY OPERATIONS RUN DATE: February 1, 2013

IN LAKE

EVAPORATION

INCHES

C.F.S.

COMPUTED*

1000 ACRE-FEET

RELEASE - C.F.S. 

TOTALS +12.8 18,596 0 0 0 198 1.73 .74

ACRE-FEET +12,814 36,885 0 0 0 393

COMMENTS:

* COMPUTED INFLOW IS THE SUM OF CHANGE IN STORAGE, RELEASES, PUMPING AND EVAPORATION.

SUMMARY

RELEASE (ACRE-FEET)

CANALS

FRIANT-KERN

MADERA

 0

 0 23,681

PRECIPITATION

THIS MONTH =

JULY 1, 2012 TO DATE = 8.36

 300.3

 23,681 0.74

CANALS

AT FRIANT

TOTAL RELEASES

OUTLET

 351

 351

 351

 366

 379

 379

 379

 365

 351

 352

 367

 390

 400

 400

 390

 380

 380

 390

 400

 400

 400

 400

 400

 400

 401

 402

 402

 402

 403

 404

 404

RIVER

 11,939

 23,681

RIVER
EXHIBIT 12
                              BellSouth Corporation
                    Computation Of Earnings To Fixed Charges
                              (Dollars In Millions)






                                                 For the Six Months
                                                   Ended June 30,
                                                      1999
1. Earnings

   (a) Income from continuing operations
       before deductions for taxes and interest   $   3,218

   (b) Portion of rental expense representative
       of interest factor                                46

   (c) Equity in losses from less-than-50%-owned
       investments (accounted for                       342
       under the equity method of accounting)

   (d) Excess of earnings over distributions of
       less-than-50%-owned  investments
       (accounted for under the equity method
        of accounting)                                  (64)

         TOTAL                                    $   3,542

2. Fixed Charges

   (a) Interest                                   $     485

   (b) Portion of rental expense representative
        of interest factor                               46

         TOTAL                                    $     531

   Ratio (1 divided by 2)                              6.67
| 1. | This      Periodic Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or      15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d));      and |
|----|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| 2. | The      information contained in the Periodic Report fairly presents, in all      material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of      the Company. |
|----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| Date      May 20, 2009 | By:    |                         |
|------------------------|--------|------------------------------|
|                   |   |                         |
|                   |   | /s/      James L. Mandel     |
|                   |   | Chief      Executive Officer |

----
```

[Congressional Bills 114th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 3916 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

114th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 3916

    To prohibit entities from using Federal funds to contribute to 
       political campaigns or participate in lobbying activities.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            November 3, 2015

 Ms. Tsongas introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
 Committee on the Judiciary, and in addition to the Committee on House 
   Administration, for a period to be subsequently determined by the 
  Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall 
           within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
    To prohibit entities from using Federal funds to contribute to 
       political campaigns or participate in lobbying activities.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``No Taxpayer Money for Corporate 
Campaigns Act of 2015''.

SEC. 2. PROHIBITION ON THE USE OF FEDERAL FUNDS FOR CAMPAIGN AND 
              LOBBYING ACTIVITIES.

    (a) Prohibition.--With respect to Federal funds received by an 
entity, other than a natural person, it shall be unlawful for such 
entity to--
            (1) use such funds to advocate the election or defeat of a 
        political candidate;
            (2) use such funds for voter registration activities or 
        get-out-the-vote activities;
            (3) use such funds to engage in any lobbying activity; or
            (4) donate such funds to any entity that advocates for the 
        election or defeat of a political candidate or engages in 
        lobbying activities.
    (b) Exception for Activities Authorized by Law.--Subsection (a) 
does not apply to the use of funds by an entity for an activity 
specifically authorized by Federal law, rule, or regulation.
                                 <all>
```
§ 266.1 Introduction. ( a ) *Explanation of representative payment.* This part explains the principles and procedures that the Board follows in determining whether to make representative payment and in selecting a representative payee. It also explains the responsibilities that a representative payee has concerning the use of the funds which he or she receives on behalf of an annuitant. A representative payee may be either a person or an organization selected by the Board to receive benefits on behalf of an annuitant. A representative payee will be selected if the Board believes that the interest of an annuitant will be served by representative payment rather than direct payment of benefits. Generally, the Board will appoint a representative payee if it determines that the annuitant is not able to manage or direct the management of benefit payments in his or her interest.
( b ) *Statutory authority.* Section 12 of the Railroad Retirement Act provides that every annuitant and claimant shall be conclusively presumed to have been competent until the date on which the Board receives a notice in writing that a legal guardian or other person legally vested with the care of the person or estate of an incompetent or a minor has been appointed: Provided, however, That despite receiving such notice, the Board may, if it finds the interests of such annuitant or claimant to be served thereby, recognize actions by, conduct transactions with, and make payments to such annuitant or claimant.
( c ) *Policy used to determine whether to make representative payment.* ( 1 ) In accordance with section 12 of the Railroad Retirement Act, the Board's policy is that every annuitant has the right to manage his or her own benefits. However, some annuitants due to mental or physical condition or due to their youth may be unable to do so. If the Board determines that the interests of an annuitant would be better served if benefit payments were certified to another person as representative payee, the Board will appoint a representative payee in accordance with the procedures set forth in this part. The Board may appoint a representative payee even if the annuitant is a legally competent individual. If the annuitant is a legally incompetent individual, the Board may appoint the legal guardian or some other person as a representative payee.
( 2 ) If payment is being made directly to an annuitant and a question arises concerning his or her ability to manage or direct the management of benefit payments, the Board may, if the annuitant is 18 years old or older and has not been adjudged legally incompetent, continue to pay the annuitant until the Board makes a determination about his or her ability to manage or direct the management of benefit payments and the selection of a representative payee.
### §§1831, 1832. Omitted

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section 1831, Pub. L. 89–10, title IV, §431, as added Pub. L. 93–380, title IV, §401, Aug. 21, 1974, 88 Stat. 543; amended Pub. L. 94–482, title V, §501(e)(2), Oct. 12, 1976, 90 Stat. 2237, which authorized a program of educational innovation and support, was omitted in the general revision of the Elementary and Secondary Education Act of 1965, titles I to IX of Pub. L. 89–10, Apr. 11, 1965, 79 Stat. 27, by Pub. L. 95–561, Nov. 1, 1978, 92 Stat. 2143.

Section 1832, Pub. L. 89–10, title IV, §432, as added Pub. L. 93–380, title IV, §401, Aug. 21, 1974, 88 Stat. 544, which provided for the use of cultural and educational resources, was omitted in the general revision of the Elementary and Secondary Education Act of 1965, titles I to IX of Pub. L. 89–10, Apr. 11, 1965, 79 Stat. 27, by Pub. L. 95–561, Nov. 1, 1978, 92 Stat. 2143.
#### § 259.6 Finality of determinations issued under this part.

Any determination rendered by the Board at the initial or reconsideration stages shall be considered a final determination and shall be binding with respect to all parties unless reversed on reconsideration or upon judicial review. A final determination may be reopened at the request of a party who was, or could have been, a party to the final determination when the party alleges that the law or the facts upon which the final determination was based have changed sufficiently to warrant a contrary determination. Such a request shall be submitted to the Secretary to the Board, who shall consider such request as a request for an initial determination under § 259.1.

[57 FR 4366, Feb. 5, 1992]
Electrical Conductivity, UMHOS

Day High Low Mean

1 0 0 0

2 0 0 0

3 0 0 0

4 0 0 0

5 0 0 0

6 0 0 0

7 0 0 0

8 0 0 0

9 0 0 0

10 0 0 0

11 0 0 0

12 0 0 0

13 0 0 0

14 0 0 0

15 0 0 0

16 0 0 0

17 0 0 0

18 0 0 0

19 0 0 0

20 0 0 0

21 0 0 0

22 0 0 0

23 0 0 0

24 0 0 0

25 0 0 0

26 0 0 0

27 0 0 0

28 0 0 0

29 0 0 0

30 0 0 0

31 0 0 0

COMMENT(S):

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

Historical Archive and Report Database

Pittsburg TopOn The Sacramento River

Period: January 2024 Run Date: 2/7/2024
### §360bbb–0. Expanded access policy required for investigational drugs

#### (a) In general

The manufacturer or distributor of one or more investigational drugs for the diagnosis, monitoring, or treatment of one or more serious diseases or conditions shall make available the policy of the manufacturer or distributor on evaluating and responding to requests submitted under section 360bbb(b) of this title for provision of such a drug.

#### (b) Public availability of expanded access policy

The policies under subsection (a) shall be made public and readily available, such as by posting such policies on a publicly available Internet website. Such policies may be generally applicable to all investigational drugs of such manufacturer or distributor.

#### (c) Content of policy

A policy described in subsection (a) shall include—

(1) contact information for the manufacturer or distributor to facilitate communication about requests described in subsection (a);

(2) procedures for making such requests;

(3) the general criteria the manufacturer or distributor will use to evaluate such requests for individual patients, and for responses to such requests;

(4) the length of time the manufacturer or distributor anticipates will be necessary to acknowledge receipt of such requests; and

(5) a hyperlink or other reference to the clinical trial record containing information about the expanded access for such drug that is required under section 282(j)(2)(A)(ii)(II)(gg) of title 42.

#### (d) No guarantee of access

The posting of policies by manufacturers and distributors under subsection (a) shall not serve as a guarantee of access to any specific investigational drug by any individual patient.

#### (e) Revised policy

Nothing in this section shall prevent a manufacturer or distributor from revising a policy required under this section at any time.

#### (f) Application

This section shall apply to a manufacturer or distributor with respect to an investigational drug beginning on the earlier of—

(1) the first initiation of a phase 2 or phase 3 study (as such terms are defined in section 312.21(b) and (c) of title 21, Code of Federal Regulations (or any successor regulations)) with respect to such investigational drug; or

(2) as applicable, 15 days after the drug receives a designation as a breakthrough therapy, fast track product, or regenerative advanced therapy under subsection (a), (b), or (g), respectively, of section 356 of this title.

(June 25, 1938, ch. 675, §561A, as added Pub. L. 114–255, div. A, title III, §3032, Dec. 13, 2016, 130 Stat. 1100; amended Pub. L. 115–52, title VI, §610(c), Aug. 18, 2017, 131 Stat. 1053.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

2017—Subsec. (f). Pub. L. 115–52 substituted "earlier" for "later" in introductory provisions, added par. (2), redesignated former par. (2) as (1), and struck out former par. (1) which read as follows: "the date that is 60 calendar days after December 13, 2016; or".
UN PUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 18
- 4332

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA , Plaintiff

- Appellee ,

v. GREGORY WADDELL HAYES , Defendant

- Appellant

.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina , at Raleigh

. Terrence W. Boyle , Chief District Judge. ( 5:09

- cr - 00116

- BO

- 1 )

Submitted : January 18, 2019 Decided: March 5, 2019

Before GREGORY, Chief Judge, HARRIS , Circuit Judge , and TRAXLER, Senior Circuit Judge

.

Affirmed by un published per curiam opinion

. G. Alan DuBois, Federal Public Defender, Eric Joseph Brignac, Chief Appellate Attorney, OFFICE OF THE FEDERAL PUBLIC DEFENDER, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellant. Robert J. Higdon, Jr., United States Attorney, Jennifer P. May

- Parker, Kristine L. Fritz, Assistant United States Attorney s , OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM: Gregory Waddell Hayes appeals the revocation of his supervised release and the
42

- month sentence imposed by the district court upon revocation

. On appeal, Hayes argues that his revocation sentence viola tes the Double Jeopardy Clause because he also was sentenced by the state court for the same conduct that led to the revocation of his supervised release. We affirm. “We review de novo questions concerning the Double Jeopardy Clause.” United
States v. Sc hnittker , 807 F.3d 77, 81 (4th Cir. 2015). This court has previously determined that “[ t ] he sentence imposed upon revocation of a term of supervised release is an authorized part of the original sentence, just as the term of supervised release is an autho rized part of the original sentence for commission of the felony.” United States v. Woodrup , 86 F.3d 359, 361 (4th Cir. 1996); see also Johnson v. United States , 529 U.S. 694, 699

– 70 1 (2000) ; United States v. Ketter , 908 F.3d 61, 65 (4th Cir. 2018) . Therefore, a sentence imposed upon revocation of supervised release does not implicate the Double Jeopardy Clause. Woodrup , 86 F.3d at 361

– 63. Hayes’s argument is thus foreclosed by binding precedent. “A decision of a panel of this court becomes the law of the circuit and is binding on other panels unless it is overruled by a subsequent en banc opinion of this court or a superseding contrary decision of the Supreme Court.” United States v. Collins , 415 F.3d 304, 311 (4th Cir. 2005). As there has bee n no subsequent contrary en banc or Supreme Court decision affecting this precedent, Hayes’ argument must fail.3 Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s revocation judgment. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are a dequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
#### § 229.80 Earnings restrictions.

The O/M may be reduced due to earnings from employment or self-employment in the same manner as a social security benefit. These restrictions on earnings are found at subpart E of part 404 of this chapter. Earnings can never reduce an employee's benefit below the railroad formula rate less the amount that those benefits would be reduced by earnings.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

DAY HIGH

 14,635

 13,716

 12,477

 11,729

 12,927

 13,128

 14,655

 15,077

 15,882

 16,806

 16,906

 16,452

 15,497

 14,974

 14,755

 14,402

 14,633

 14,638

 12,988

 11,140

 12,687

 14,880

 14,387

 14,401

 14,625

 15,698

 14,739

 14,754

 3,838

 4,023

 3,757

 3,871

 4,036

 4,622

 4,442

 5,368

 6,455

 5,005

 6,660

 5,097

 4,809

 5,696

 4,610

 4,913

 4,878

 5,932

 5,920

 4,400

 4,812

 4,856

 3,282

 3,289

 3,286

 3,798

 3,705

 4,552

 9,468

 8,866

 8,399

 8,152

 8,058

 7,893

 7,788

 8,981

 10,419

 10,982

 11,547

 11,412

 9,904

 10,530

 9,908

 9,403

 9,822

 10,491

 9,178

 7,656

 7,910

 8,676

 7,603

 8,296

 8,597

 9,684

 9,086

 9,535

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

FEBRUARY 2018 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: March 1, 2018

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

PORT CHICAGO TOP IN SUISUN BAY
Exhibit 32.2

Certification by the Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to
18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, I, the undersigned Chief Financial Officer of Genzyme Corporation (the "Company"), hereby
certify that the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the quarter ended June 30, 2010 (the "Report") fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.

/s/ MICHAEL S. WYZGA Michael S. Wyzga Chief Financial OfficerAugust 9, 2010


---



QuickLinks