alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

DAY ELEVATION

 238.85

 238.90

 238.79

 238.83

 238.81

 238.74

 238.72

 239.88

 239.20

 238.83

 238.74

 238.72

 238.70

 238.71

 238.70

 238.70

 238.75

 238.71

 238.70

 238.70

 238.70

 238.70

 238.70

 238.70

 238.70

 238.77

 238.75

 238.77

 238.85

 239.45

 335

 340

 329

 333

 331

 323

 321

 456

 374

 333

 323

 321

 319

 320

 319

 319

 325

 320

 319

 319

 319

 319

 319

 319

 319

 327

 325

 327

 335

 404

STORAGE

-2

+5

-11

+4

-2

-8

-2

+135

-82

-41

-10

-2

-2

+1

-1

+0

+6

-5

-1

+0

+0

+0

+0

+0

+0

+8

-2

+2

+8

+69

CHANGE

 18

 38

 36

 57

 46

 39

 44

 15

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 75

 84

 75

 75

 75

 75

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 7,602

 7,574

 7,257

 7,587

 7,316

 6,896

 6,986

 12,200

 8,030

 7,160

 6,970

 6,860

 6,780

 6,760

 6,735

 6,820

 7,220

 6,970

 6,657

 6,685

 6,800

 6,750

 6,780

 6,800

 6,840

 7,120

 6,945

 6,900

 8,680

 8,500

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

NOVEMBER 2005 RED BLUFF DIVERSION RESERVOIR DAILY OPERATIONS RUN DATE: March 14, 2006

IN LAKE

CANAL

 ACRE-FEET

TOTALS +67 752 219,180

ACRE-FEET +67 1,492 434,744

SUMMARY

RELEASE (ACRE-FEET)

TOTAL 436,460

 337

RELEASE

RIVER

CORNING TO SACTO

CANAL

RELEASE C.F.S.

TEHAMA

COLUSA

 0

 7

 37

 15

 8

 15

 9

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 14

 8

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 113

 224

CORNING CANAL 224

TEHAMA-COLUSA CANAL 1,492

TO SACTO RIVER 434,744

Table 9
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY ELEVATION

 252.43

 252.52

 252.58

 252.57

 252.59

 252.59

 252.43

 252.44

 252.43

 252.54

 252.48

 252.43

 252.44

 252.56

 252.58

 252.44

 252.47

 252.41

 252.59

 252.52

 252.56

 252.55

 252.59

 252.58

 252.48

 252.55

 252.57

 252.54

 252.49

 252.45

 252.51

 3,889

 3,933

 3,963

 3,958

 3,968

 3,968

 3,889

 3,894

 3,889

 3,943

 3,914

 3,889

 3,894

 3,953

 3,963

 3,894

 3,909

 3,879

 3,968

 3,933

 3,953

 3,948

 3,968

 3,963

 3,914

 3,948

 3,958

 3,943

 3,919

 3,899

 3,928

STORAGE

+10

+44

+30

-5

+10

+0

-79

+5

-5

+54

-29

-25

+5

+59

+10

-69

+15

-30

+89

-35

+20

-5

+20

-5

-49

+34

+10

-15

-24

-20

+29

CHANGE

 996

 1,101

 1,103

 1,111

 1,021

 945

 1,083

 1,026

 1,134

 1,096

 1,214

 1,033

 1,158

 925

 911

 874

 901

 818

 749

 942

 851

 889

 940

 833

 931

 878

 914

 758

 832

 744

 717

 11,262

 11,310

 10,782

 11,346

 11,190

 11,034

 10,266

 11,334

 11,466

 11,406

 11,382

 11,322

 11,790

 12,078

 11,742

 12,018

 11,970

 12,150

 12,150

 11,850

 11,538

 11,742

 11,730

 11,718

 11,430

 11,682

 11,370

 11,658

 11,634

 11,910

 11,886

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

JULY 2010 RED BLUFF DIVERSION RESERVOIR DAILY OPERATIONS RUN DATE: August 26, 2010

IN LAKE

CANAL

 ACRE-FEET

TOTALS +49 29,428 358,146

ACRE-FEET +49 58,370 710,383

SUMMARY

RELEASE (ACRE-FEET)

TOTAL 772,904

 3,879

RELEASE

RIVER

CORNING TO SACTO

CANAL

RELEASE C.F.S

TEHAMA

COLUSA

 67

 71

 54

 63

 0

 101

 88

 59

 106

 68

 51

 51

 64

 78

 87

 97

 72

 60

 60

 52

 70

 77

 74

 71

 66

 55

 60

 75

 73

 55

 68

 2,093

 4,151

CORNING CANAL 4,151

TEHAMA-COLUSA CANAL 58,370

TO SACTO RIVER 710,383
§ 350.5 Miscellaneous. ( a ) The Board may not be required to vary its normal disbursement cycles in order to comply with legal process. However, legal process which is received too late to be honored during the disbursement cycle in which it is received may be honored to the extent that the legal process may, in compliance with this part, be satisfied from the next payment due to the obligor.
( b ) Except as provided in these regulations, the Board may not be required in connection with proceedings under this part to forward documents which have been sent to the Board, to an individual, whether or not he is entitled to benefits paid by the Board, or to disclose information other than that relating to the type, amount (whether actual or estimated), and dates of payment of benefits paid by the Board to that individual.
( c ) Neither the Board nor any of its employees shall be liable with respect to any payment made to any individual from moneys due from or payable by the Board pursuant to legal process regular on its face, if such payment is made in accordance with this part.
( d ) No employee of the Board whose duties include responding to legal process pursuant to requirements contained in this part shall be subject under any law to any disciplinary action or civil or criminal liability or penalty for, or on account of, any disclosure of information made by such employee in connection with the performance of the employee's duties in responding to any such process.
( e ) For purposes of a proceeding under this part, the Board will apply the law of the state in which the legal process is issued unless it comes to the attention of the Board that the state of issuance has no contact with the plaintiff or defendant in the action; in which case, the Board may, in its sole discretion, apply the law of any state with significant interest in the matter.
( f ) No acknowledgement or response will be made to legal process which does not contain the mailing address to which acknowledgement may be made. No response to any legal process will be notarized or verified.
[45 FR 28314, Apr. 29, 1980, as amended at 50 FR 12242, Mar. 28, 1985]
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY HIGH

 165

 177

 181

 188

 189

 189

 188

 200

 197

 206

 225

 249

 270

 280

 281

 281

 286

 277

 296

 292

 292

 290

 295

 307

 303

 295

 288

 288

 264

 303

 296

 144

 146

 142

 127

 134

 117

 130

 130

 138

 137

 142

 152

 146

 150

 150

 171

 176

 200

 186

 210

 187

 182

 176

 177

 172

 158

 152

 147

 152

 171

 176

 156

 163

 167

 170

 174

 170

 173

 180

 181

 182

 194

 208

 204

 210

 217

 226

 229

 231

 234

 248

 239

 236

 237

 241

 237

 229

 213

 211

 205

 208

 222

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

MARCH 2004 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: April 19, 2004

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

RIO VISTA ON THE SACRAMENTO RIVER
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY HIGH

 7,912

 8,310

 8,629

 8,585

 8,740

 9,452

 10,103

 0

 0

 16,502

 16,337

 14,466

 13,791

 12,795

 13,690

 14,030

 14,609

 12,554

 10,309

 10,704

 11,838

 13,551

 15,629

 15,101

 13,878

 15,413

 15,985

 17,307

 17,281

 14,541

 13,788

 3,529

 3,523

 3,590

 3,897

 3,932

 4,203

 4,600

 0

 0

 4,198

 3,506

 2,927

 2,566

 2,573

 2,718

 3,133

 4,014

 3,485

 2,713

 2,451

 2,109

 2,933

 3,074

 3,938

 2,775

 2,657

 3,104

 3,528

 3,510

 2,854

 2,530

 5,827

 6,136

 6,449

 6,692

 6,699

 6,870

 6,933

 0

 0

 9,676

 8,651

 8,094

 7,701

 7,580

 7,882

 8,655

 9,539

 8,406

 7,046

 6,518

 5,900

 5,970

 8,011

 8,730

 8,212

 8,616

 9,327

 9,886

 9,352

 8,287

 8,067

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

AUGUST 2019 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: September 10, 2019

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

PORT CHICAGO TOP IN SUISUN BAY
Exhibit 8.1
 [Hogan Lovells US LLP Letterhead]
  
  Company Operating Partnership Registration Statement Common Shares Preferred Shares Depositary Shares
 Bases for Opinions
 Code IRS




---



##### 



Reviewed Documents
 Management Representation Letter
       Opinions
  2




---



##### 



3




---



##### 



4
# C_2012117EN.01000701.xml

| 21.4.2012 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 117/7 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

21.4.2012

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 117/7

---

Notice of the impending expiry of certain anti-dumping measures

2012/C 117/06

1.   As provided for in Article 11(2) of Council Regulation (EC) No 1225/2009 of 30 November 2009 on protection against dumped imports from countries not members of the European Community (1), the Commission gives notice that, unless a review is initiated in accordance with the following procedure, the anti-dumping measures mentioned below will expire on the date mentioned in the table below.

1

2.   Procedure

Procedure

Union producers may lodge a written request for a review. This request must contain sufficient evidence that the expiry of the measures would be likely to result in a continuation or recurrence of dumping and injury.

Should the Commission decide to review the measures concerned, importers, exporters, representatives of the exporting country and Union producers will then be provided with the opportunity to amplify, rebut or comment on the matters set out in the review request.

3.   Time limit

Time limit

Union producers may submit a written request for a review on the above basis, to reach the European Commission, Directorate-General for Trade (Unit H-1), N-105 4/92, 1049 Brussels, Belgium (2) at any time from the date of the publication of the present notice but no later than three months before the date mentioned in the table below.

2

4.   This notice is published in accordance with Article 11(2) of Regulation (EC) No 1225/2009.

| Product | Country(ies) of origin or exportation | Measures | Reference | Date of expiry (3) |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Polyethylene terephthalate (PET) film | India, Brazil and Israel | Anti-dumping duty | Council Regulation (EC) No 1292/2007 (OJ L 288, 6.11.2007, p. 1) | 7.11.2012 |

Product

Country(ies) of origin or exportation

Measures

Reference

Date of expiry (3)

3

Polyethylene terephthalate (PET) film

India, Brazil and Israel

Anti-dumping duty

Council Regulation (EC) No 1292/2007 (OJ L 288, 6.11.2007, p. 1)

7.11.2012

---

(1)  OJ L 343, 22.12.2009, p. 51.

1

(2)  Fax +32 22956505.

2

(3)  The measure expires at midnight of the day mentioned in this column.

3

---
I 

114TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 3931 

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located at 

620 Central Avenue Suite 1A in Hot Springs National Park, Arkansas, 

as the ‘‘Chief Petty Officer Adam Brown United States Post Office’’. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

NOVEMBER 4, 2015 

Mr. WESTERMAN (for himself, Mr. CRAWFORD, Mr. HILL, Mr. ZINKE, Mr. 

MCDERMOTT, and Mr. WOMACK) introduced the following bill; which was 

referred to the Committee on Oversight and Government Reform 

A BILL 

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service 

located at 620 Central Avenue Suite 1A in Hot Springs 

National Park, Arkansas, as the ‘‘Chief Petty Officer 

Adam Brown United States Post Office’’. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. CHIEF PETTY OFFICER ADAM BROWN UNITED 

4 STATES POST OFFICE. 

5 (a) DESIGNATION.—The facility of the United States 

6 Postal Service located at 620 Central Avenue Suite 1A 

7 in Hot Springs National Park, Arkansas, shall be known 


emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 3931 IH

1 and designated as the ‘‘Chief Petty Officer Adam Brown 

2 United States Post Office’’. 

3 (b) REFERENCES.—Any reference in a law, map, reg4 ulation, document, paper, or other record of the United 

5 States to the facility referred to in subsection (a) shall 

6 be deemed to be a reference to the ‘‘Chief Petty Officer 

7 Adam Brown United States Post Office’’. 

Æ 


emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with BILLS
### §379d–5. Guidance document regarding product promotion using the Internet

Not later than 2 years after July 9, 2012, the Secretary of Health and Human Services shall issue guidance that describes Food and Drug Administration policy regarding the promotion, using the Internet (including social media), of medical products that are regulated by such Administration.

(Pub. L. 112–144, title XI, §1121, July 9, 2012, 126 Stat. 1112.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section was enacted as part of the Food and Drug Administration Safety and Innovation Act, and not as part of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act which comprises this chapter.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE BALANCE
SHEETS AS OF DECEMBER 31, 1996, AND STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS FOR THE YEAR ENDED
DECEMBER 31, 1996, AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>   
       
<S>                                 <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                       12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                   DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                      JAN-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                        DEC-31-1996
<CASH>                              43,240
<SECURITIES>                        0
<RECEIVABLES>                       28,721
<ALLOWANCES>                        (7,510)
<INVENTORY>                         0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                    894,410
<PP&E>                              93,795
<DEPRECIATION>                      (30,725)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                      1,579,489
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>               2,464,269
<BONDS>                             0
<COMMON>                            0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>               0
<PREFERRED>                         951
<OTHER-SE>                          (1,194,598)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>        1,579,489
<SALES>                             11,003,326
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                    11,003,326
<CGS>                               8,913,885
<TOTAL-COSTS>                       11,875,981
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                    0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                    8,810
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                  56,098
<INCOME-PRETAX>                     (872,655)
<INCOME-TAX>                        0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                 (872,655)   
<DISCONTINUED>                      0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                     0
<CHANGES>                           0
<NET-INCOME>                        (872,655)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                       (0.09)
<EPS-DILUTED>                       (0.09)
           

</TABLE>
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

DAY HIGH

 1,501

 1,791

 2,983

 2,166

 2,493

 1,981

 2,212

 1,856

 1,657

 824

 701

 429

 329

 375

 422

 394

 386

 377

 380

 437

 435

 437

 406

 443

 540

 671

 940

 2,628

 3,432

 4,966

 297

 526

 623

 673

 651

 628

 427

 373

 298

 278

 245

 218

 203

 200

 351

 343

 329

 321

 322

 322

 322

 318

 314

 311

 313

 312

 331

 243

 422

 460

 804

 753

 1,065

 1,189

 1,056

 960

 883

 717

 557

 429

 370

 290

 247

 249

 372

 358

 345

 339

 340

 338

 344

 342

 335

 360

 381

 414

 572

 1,407

 1,255

 2,311

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

APRIL 2004 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: May 19, 2004

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

PITTSBURG TOP ON THE SACRAMENTO RIVER
§ 356.3 False claims. ( a ) For claims or statements made on or before October 23, 1996, the minimum penalty which may be assessed under 31 U.S.C. 3729 is $5,000 and the maximum penalty is $10,000.
( b ) For claims or statements made after October 23, 1996, but before August 1, 2016, the minimum penalty which may be assessed under 31 U.S.C. 3729 is $5,500 and the maximum penalty is $11,000.
( c ) For claims or statements made on or after August 1, 2016, but before January 1, 2017, the minimum penalty which may be assessed under 31 U.S.C. 3729 is $10,781 and the maximum penalty is $21,563.
( d ) For claims or statements made on or after January 1, 2017, the minimum and maximum penalty amounts which may be assessed under 31 U.S.C. 3729 is the larger of: ( 1 ) The amount for the previous calendar year; or
( 2 ) An amount adjusted for inflation, calculated by multiplying the amount for the previous calendar year by the percentage by which the CPI-U for the month of October preceding the current calendar year exceeds the CPI-U for the month of October of the calendar year two years prior to the current calendar year, adding that amount to the amount for the previous calendar year, and rounding the total to the nearest dollar.
( e ) Notice of the minimum and maximum penalty which may be assessed under 31 U.S.C. 3729 for calendar years after 2016 will be published by the Board in the Federal Register on an annual basis on or before January 15 of each calendar year.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

DAY HIGH

 14,438

 14,537

 16,040

 16,525

 16,963

 16,795

 17,173

 18,884

 13,611

 12,246

 10,234

 9,971

 10,500

 10,530

 10,990

 12,083

 11,832

 13,039

 13,158

 14,134

 15,283

 16,291

 16,065

 13,140

 11,834

 13,942

 12,922

 13,373

 14,598

 15,475

 5,758

 6,772

 7,056

 8,238

 7,296

 7,429

 7,516

 8,373

 7,957

 5,851

 4,375

 3,539

 3,462

 3,914

 3,908

 4,518

 4,133

 5,036

 4,869

 4,976

 4,911

 5,412

 6,630

 5,863

 5,398

 5,202

 5,650

 5,853

 6,210

 6,897

 10,425

 10,538

 10,905

 11,559

 11,431

 11,274

 12,935

 13,622

 9,931

 9,525

 7,550

 6,827

 6,793

 6,738

 6,758

 7,296

 7,903

 8,256

 8,348

 8,819

 9,742

 10,726

 10,767

 9,298

 8,648

 9,248

 9,499

 9,780

 10,157

 10,753

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

NOVEMBER 2002 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: December 9, 2002

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

PITTSBURG TOP ON THE SACRAMENTO RIVER
#### § 202.4 Control.

A company or person is controlled by one or more carriers, whenever there exists in one or more such carriers the right or power by any means, method or circumstance, irrespective of stock ownership to direct, either directly or indirectly, the policies and business of such a company or person and in any case in which a carrier is in fact exercising direction of the policies and business of such a company or person.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE WARREN SMALL, Defendant Below, Appellant,

v. STATE OF DELAWARE, Plaintiff Below, Appellee. § § No. 96, 2020 § § § § Court Below–Superior Court § of the State of Delaware § § Cr. ID No. 1209020733 (N) § §

Submitted: March 18, 2020 Decided: March 23, 2020

Before SEITZ , Chief Justice; VALIHURA , and MONTGOMERY-REEVES , Justices.

ORDER Upon consideration of the notice to show cause and the appellant’s response, it appears to the Court that: (1) On March 6, 2020, the Court recei ved Warren Small’s notice of appeal from a February 4, 2020 Superior Court viol ation of probation sentencing order. To be timely filed, the notice of appeal had to be recei ved by the Clerk or a Deputy Clerk in any county on or before March 5, 2020. 1

1 Del. Supr. Ct. R. 6(a); Del. Supr. Ct. R. 10(a); Del. Supr. Ct. R. 11(a).2 (2) On March 6, 2020, the Chief Deput y Clerk issued a notice directing Small to show cause why his appeal should not be dismissed as untimely. Small filed a response to the notice to show cause , stating that he had placed his notice of appeal in the prison mail on February 25, 2020. Small attached a copy of his inmate statement, which shows that his account was charged for postage on February 27,

2020. (3) Time is a jurisdictional requirement. 2 A notice of appeal must be received by the Court within the app licable time period to be effective. 3 An appellant’s pro se status does not excuse a failure to comply strictly with the jurisdictional requirements of Supreme Court Rule 6. 4 Unless an appellant can

demonstrate that the failure to file a timely notice of appe al is attributable to courtrelated personnel, the app eal cannot be considered. 5 It is undisputed that Small’s notice of appeal was received by the Court after the thirty-day deadline. Delaware has declined to adopt the pr ison mailbox rule, wherein a pro se prisoner’s notice of appeal is deemed “filed” at the moment it is delivered to prison authorities for forwarding to the Court. 6

2 Carr v. State , 554 A.2d 778, 779 (Del.), cert. denied , 493 U.S. 829 (1989). 3 Del. Supr. Ct. R. 10(a). 4 Smith v. State , 47 A.3d 481, 485-87 (Del. 2012). 5 Bey v. State , 402 A.2d 362, 363 (Del. 1979). 6 Smith v. State , 47 A.3d 481, 483-87 (Del. 2012).3 (4) The record does not reflect that Sma ll’s failure to file a timely notice of appeal is attributable to court-related personnel. Consequen tly, this case does not fall within the exception to the general rule that mandates the timely filing of a notice of appeal. Thus, the Court concludes th at this appeal must be dismissed. NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, under Supreme Court Rule 29(b), that the appeal is DISMISSED.

BY THE COURT:

/s/ Collins J. Seitz, Jr. Chief Justice
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSIONWashington, D.C. 20549 FORM 8-K CURRENT REPORT
Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 Date of Report (Date of earliest event reported): June 22, 2011  HEARTWARE INTERNATIONAL, INC.
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter) Delaware
    
    001-34256
    
    26-3636023(State or other Jurisdiction of Incorporation)
    
    (Commission File Number)
    
    (IRS Employer Identification No.) 205 Newbury Street, Suite 101Framingham, MA
    
    01701(Address of Principal Executive Offices)
    
    (Zip Code) Registrants telephone number, including area code: 508.739.0950 (Former name or former address if changed since last report.) Check the appropriate box below if the Form 8-K filing is intended to simultaneously satisfy the filing obligation of the registrant
under any of the following provisions: o Written communications pursuant to Rule 425 under the Securities Act (17 CFR 230.425)o Soliciting material pursuant to Rule 14a-12 under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.14a-12)o Pre-commencement communications pursuant to Rule 14d-2(b) under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.14d-2(b))o Pre-commencement communications pursuant to Rule 13e-4(c) under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.13e-4(c))
  1




---



##### 



Item 8.01 Other Events HeartWare International, Inc. (NASDAQ:HTWR, ASIC:HIN) was
notified of full reimbursement in France of the HeartWare Ventricular Assist
System following publication on
June 22nd,
2011 in the Ministry of Labor, Employment and Healths Official Journal of the French Republic. 
Publication is the final step to receiving reimbursement of a medical device in France. Reimbursement will be effective
July 4, 2011. SIGNATURES Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be
signed on its behalf by the undersigned hereunto duly authorized. HeartWare International, Inc.Date: June 27, 2011
    
    By:
    
    /s/ Lawrence J. KnopfName: Lawrence J. KnopfTitle: Senior Vice President and General Counsel
  2