alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
###### Editorial Note on Part 71

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 71 appear by T.D. ATF-414, 64 FR 49084, Sept. 10, 1999and T.D. ATF-463, 66 FR 42734, 42735, Aug. 15, 2001.

#### § 71.35 Opportunity for compliance.

Except in proceedings involving willfulness or those in which the public interest requires otherwise, and the appropriate TTB officer so alleges in his citation, stating his reasons therefor, no permit shall be suspended, revoked or annulled, unless, prior to the institution of proceedings, facts or conduct warranting such action shall have been called to the attention of the permittee by the appropriate TTB officer, in writing, and the permittee shall have been accorded an opportunity to demonstrate or achieve compliance with all lawful requirements, as set forth in section 9(b) of the Administrative Procedure Act. If the permittee fails to meet the requirements of the law and regulations within such reasonable time as may be specified by the appropriate TTB officer, proceedings for suspension, revocation or annulment of the permit shall be initiated.

[21 FR 1441, Mar. 6, 1956. Redesignated at 40 FR 16835, Apr. 15, 1975, and amended by T.D. ATF-199, 50 FR 9196, Mar. 6, 1985; T.D. ATF-374, 61 FR 29957, June 13, 1996]
#### § 404.1077 Individuals under railroad retirement system.

If you are an employee or employee representative as defined in section 3231 (b) and (c) of the Code, your work is not a trade or business. Your services are covered under the railroad retirement system.
§ 404.349 When is a child living apart from me in my care? ( a ) *In your care.* A child living apart from you is in your care if— ( 1 ) The child lived apart from you for not more than 6 months, or the child's current absence from you is not expected to last over 6 months;
( 2 ) The child is under 16 years old, you supervise his or her activities and make important decisions about his or her needs, and one of the following circumstances exist: ( i ) The child is living apart because of school but spends at least 30 days vacation with you each year unless some event makes having the vacation unreasonable; and if you and the child's other parent are separated, the school looks to you for decisions about the child's welfare;
( ii ) The child is living apart because of your employment but you make regular and substantial contributions to his or her support; see § 404.366(a) for a definition of *contributions for support*;
( iii ) The child is living apart because of a physical disability that the child has or that you have; or
( 3 ) The child is 16 years old or older, is mentally disabled, and you supervise his or her activities, make important decisions about his or her needs, and help in his or her upbringing and development.
( b ) *Not in your care.* A child living apart from you is not in your care if— ( 1 ) The child is in active military service;
( 2 ) The child is living with his or her other parent;
( 3 ) The child is removed from your custody and control by a court order;
( 4 ) The child is 16 years old or older, is mentally competent, and either has been living apart from you for 6 months or more or begins living apart from you and is expected to be away for more than 6 months;
( 5 ) You gave your right to have custody and control of the child to someone else; or
( 6 ) You are mentally disabled.
[44 FR 34481, June 15, 1979, as amended at 48 FR 21927, May 16, 1983]
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff—Appellee, v. Isabel MARTINEZ-GONZALEZ, a.k.a. Pedro Florencio Martinez-Gonzalez; et al., Defendant—Appellant.

No. 06-30009.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted July 17, 2006.*

Decided July 21, 2006.

Gregory M. Shogren, Esq., USYA — Office of the U.S. Attorney, Yakima, WA, for Plaintiff-Appellee.

Tracy A. Staab, Esq., FPDWA — Federal Public Defender’s Office, Spokane, WA, for Defendant-Appellant.

Before: B. FLETCHER, HAWKINS and THOMAS, Circuit Judges.

*

This panel unanimously Ends this case suitable for decision without oral argument. *See*Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

MEMORANDUM **

A review of the record and the opening brief indicates that the questions raised in this appeal are so insubstantial as not to require further argument. *See United States v. Hooton,*693 F.2d 857, 858 (9th Cir.1982) (per curiam) (stating standard).

*563Accordingly, we summarily affirm the district court’s judgment.

All pending motions are denied as moot.

AFFIRMED.

**

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 96-7371

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

versus

KEVIN TERRELL JACKSON,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern

District of North Carolina, at Greenville. Malcolm J. Howard,

District Judge. (CR-93-45-H, CA-96-103-4-H)

Submitted: April 8, 1997 Decided: May 19, 1997

Before WILKINS, HAMILTON, and LUTTIG, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

John Joseph Butler, PARKER, POE, ADAMS & BERNSTEIN, Raleigh, North

Carolina, for Appellant. Bruce Charles Johnson, OFFICE OF THE

UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Appellant seeks to appeal the district court's order denying

his motion filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West 1994 & Supp. 1997).

We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and

find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of

appealability and dismiss the appeal. United States v. Jackson,

Nos. CR-93-45-H; CA-96-103-4-H (E.D.N.C. July 3, 1996). We dispense

with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are

adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument

would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
#### § 332.6 Standing by for and laying over between regularly assigned trips or tours of duty.

Subject to the provisions of § 332.2(b), a day shall not be considered as a day of unemployment or as a day of sickness with respect to an employee if no remuneration is payable or accrues to him solely because he is standing by for or laying over between regularly assigned trips or tours of duty. Only employees who hold regular assignments may be regarded as standing by for or laying over between regularly assigned trips or tours of duty. In determining whether an employee has a regular assignment, consideration shall be given to whether the trips or tours of duty have definite starting times; whether there are a definite number of trips or tours of duty, either periodically or for the whole duration of the assignment; and whether there is a definite route of each trip or definite duration of each tour of duty. An employee who is separated from a regular assignment shall not be regarded as standing by for or laying over between regularly assigned trips or tours of duty. An employee shall be deemed separated from a regular assignment when he is suspended or discharged from service or displaced by a senior employee or held out of service for investigation or discipline, or when his regular assignment is abolished or discontinued.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

DAY ELEVATION

 252.49

 252.51

 252.49

 252.51

 252.50

 252.49

 252.50

 252.51

 252.47

 249.50

 247.00

 244.70

 239.42

 239.33

 239.34

 239.30

 239.36

 239.35

 239.31

 239.36

 239.32

 239.24

 239.23

 239.17

 239.18

 239.21

 239.10

 239.03

 239.06

 238.95

 3,919

 3,928

 3,919

 3,928

 3,924

 3,919

 3,924

 3,928

 3,909

 2,640

 1,845

 1,281

 400

 390

 391

 386

 393

 392

 387

 393

 388

 379

 378

 370

 372

 375

 362

 354

 357

 345

STORAGE

-9

+9

-9

+9

-4

-5

+5

+4

-19

-1,269

-795

-564

-881

-10

+1

-5

+7

-1

-5

+6

-5

-9

-1

-8

+2

+3

-13

-8

+3

-12

CHANGE

 385

 347

 360

 337

 342

 258

 265

 331

 366

 279

 309

 315

 287

 300

 297

 319

 354

 246

 343

 106

 369

 206

 259

 276

 210

 228

 229

 217

 342

 258

 8,670

 8,070

 8,190

 8,670

 8,790

 8,790

 8,670

 8,550

 8,460

 9,428

 9,572

 9,614

 9,538

 9,541

 9,324

 9,244

 9,349

 9,412

 9,350

 9,588

 9,438

 9,296

 9,144

 8,762

 8,811

 8,813

 8,434

 8,176

 8,200

 7,753

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

SEPTEMBER 2004 RED BLUFF DIVERSION RESERVOIR DAILY OPERATIONS RUN DATE: October 22, 2004

IN LAKE

CANAL

 ACRE-FEET

TOTALS -3,583 8,740 267,647

ACRE-FEET -3,583 17,336 530,878

SUMMARY

RELEASE (ACRE-FEET)

TOTAL 551,183

 3,928

RELEASE

RIVER

CORNING TO SACTO

CANAL

RELEASE C.F.S

TEHAMA

COLUSA

 56

 78

 50

 76

 54

 41

 62

 62

 50

 50

 50

 51

 53

 46

 51

 69

 48

 50

 52

 38

 32

 51

 43

 44

 45

 29

 30

 40

 52

 44

 1,497

 2,969

CORNING CANAL 2,969

TEHAMA-COLUSA CANAL 17,336

TO SACTO RIVER 530,878

Table 9
### §§1121 to 1123. Repealed. Pub. L. 92–255, title I, §104, Mar. 21, 1972, 86 Stat. 67

Section 1121, Pub. L. 92–255, title II, §211, Mar. 21, 1972, 86 Stat. 69, provided for appointment of an acting Director until position was initially filled.

Section 1122, Pub. L. 92–255, title II, §213, Mar. 21, 1972, 86 Stat. 69, prohibited Director or any other Federal officer from waiving or disregarding any limitation or requirement prescribed by law with respect to any Federal program or activity.

Section 1123, Pub. L. 92–255, title II, §214, Mar. 21, 1972, 86 Stat. 70, provided for authorization of appropriations, and fiscal year availability of such appropriations.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date of Repeal

Section 1104 of this title, prior to repeal by Pub. L. 94–237, §4(c)(1), Mar. 19, 1976, 90 Stat. 244, provided for repeal of sections effective June 30, 1975.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY HIGH

 16,793

 18,269

 18,745

 19,302

 18,960

 19,819

 19,902

 19,474

 16,735

 17,551

 16,621

 16,969

 16,938

 17,595

 16,186

 18,887

 19,596

 19,573

 20,138

 19,998

 19,691

 18,123

 17,225

 15,873

 16,190

 16,169

 15,957

 16,191

 16,668

 17,179

 18,171

 8,599

 9,713

 10,251

 10,196

 9,609

 8,726

 8,957

 9,025

 8,482

 8,555

 9,331

 8,918

 9,229

 9,822

 9,348

 9,492

 9,615

 9,154

 8,892

 9,353

 9,239

 8,585

 7,803

 7,898

 8,082

 8,272

 8,224

 9,237

 8,914

 8,837

 9,210

 12,906

 13,964

 14,888

 14,638

 14,162

 13,997

 14,142

 14,199

 13,511

 13,519

 13,454

 13,277

 13,173

 13,189

 13,198

 13,778

 14,063

 14,221

 14,111

 14,276

 14,107

 13,516

 12,818

 12,306

 12,613

 12,555

 12,210

 12,188

 12,496

 12,714

 13,556

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

MAY 2015 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: June 1, 2015

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

PITTSBURG BOTTOM ON THE SACRAMENTO RIVER
###### Editorial Note on Part 40

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 40 appear by T.D. ATF-460, 66 FR 39094-39096, July 27, 2001; T.D. ATF-464, 66 FR 43479, Aug. 20, 2001; and T.D. TTB-91, 76 FR 5479, Feb. 1, 2011.

#### § 40.132 Deposit of securities in lieu of corporate surety.

In lieu of corporate surety the manufacturer of tobacco products may pledge and deposit, as security for his bond, securities which are transferable and are guaranteed as to both interest and principal by the United States, in accordance with the provisions of 31 CFR part 225.

(61 Stat. 650, 72 Stat. 1421; 6 U.S.C.9301, 9303; 26 U.S.C. 5711)
§ 243.5 Assignment of a portion of an annuity paid under the social security overall minimum provision. Section 3(f)(3) of the Railroad Retirement Act, the social security overall minimum provision, guarantees that an annuitant will receive, in combined benefits under the Railroad Retirement and Social Security Acts, not less than the amount which would have been paid to the employee and to members of his or her family under the Social Security Act if the employee's railroad service had been creditable under that Act. An annuitant whose annuity is computed under that provision may assign all or any portion of that annuity to any of the members of his or her family who are or who could be included in the computation of the annuity. Any assignment issued pursuant to this section will terminate: ( a ) When revoked by the annuitant by notification to the Board; or
( b ) When the annuity is no longer computed under the social security overall minimum provision.
### §1161n–1. Reservations

#### (a) Reservations

Of the amount appropriated to carry out this part in each fiscal year—

(1) not less than 50 percent shall be available for awarding grants to institutions of higher education and consortia of such institutions described in section 1161n–2(a)(1)(A) of this title for cooperative education under section 1161n–2 of this title;

(2) not less than 25 percent shall be available for awarding grants to institutions of higher education described in section 1161n–2(a)(1)(B) of this title for cooperative education under section 1161n–2 of this title;

(3) not to exceed 11 percent shall be available for demonstration projects under paragraph (1) of section 1161n–3(a) of this title;

(4) not to exceed 11 percent shall be available for training and resource centers under paragraph (2) of section 1161n–3(a) of this title; and

(5) not to exceed 3 percent shall be available for research under paragraph (3) of section 1161n–3(a) of this title.

#### (b) Availability of appropriations

Amounts appropriated under this part shall not be used for the payment of compensation of students for employment by employers participating in a program under this part.

(Pub. L. 89–329, title VIII, §832, as added Pub. L. 110–315, title VIII, §801, Aug. 14, 2008, 122 Stat. 3415.)
### **CHAPTER 48A—TAIWAN ENHANCED RESILIENCE**

#### SUBCHAPTER I—IMPLEMENTATION OF AN ENHANCED DEFENSE PARTNERSHIP BETWEEN THE UNITED STATES AND TAIWAN

Sec.
3351.
Modernizing Taiwan's security capabilities to deter and, if necessary, defeat aggression by the People's Republic of China.
3352.
Establishment.
3353.
International military education and training cooperation with Taiwan.
3354.
Use of Special Defense Acquisition Fund.
3355.
Multi-year plan to fulfill defensive requirements of military forces of Taiwan.
3356.
Fast-tracking sales to Taiwan under foreign military sales program.
3357.
Findings and statement of policy.
3357a.
Statement of policy on Taiwan.
3357b.
Establishment of training, advising, and institutional capacity-building program for military forces of Taiwan.

#### SUBCHAPTER II—COUNTERING PEOPLE'S REPUBLIC OF CHINA'S COERCION AND INFLUENCE CAMPAIGNS

3361.
Strategy to respond to influence and information operations targeting Taiwan.
3362.
Task force to counter economic coercion by the People's Republic of China.
3363.
China censorship monitor and action group.

#### SUBCHAPTER III—INCLUSION OF TAIWAN IN INTERNATIONAL ORGANIZATIONS

3371.
Findings.
3372.
Strategy to support Taiwan's meaningful participation in international organizations.
3373.
Meaningful participation of Taiwan in the International Civil Aviation Organization.

#### SUBCHAPTER IV—SUPPORTING UNITED STATES EDUCATIONAL AND EXCHANGE PROGRAMS WITH TAIWAN

3381.
Findings.
3382.
Purposes.
3383.
Definitions.
3384.
Taiwan Fellowship Program.
3385.
Reports and audits.
3386.
Taiwan fellows on detail from Government service.
3387.
Funding.
3388.
Supporting United States educational and exchange programs with Taiwan.

#### SUBCHAPTER V—RULES OF CONSTRUCTION

3391.
Rule of construction.
3392.
Rule of construction regarding the use of military force.
§ 201.1 Words and phrases. For the purposes of the regulations in this chapter, except where the language or context indicates otherwise: ( a ) *Act.* The term “act,” or “1937 act” means the Railroad Retirement Act of 1937 (50 Stat. 307; 45 U.S.C. chapter 9). The term “1935 act,” means the Railroad Retirement Act of 1935 (49 Stat. 967; 45 U.S.C. chapter 9).
( b ) *Employer.* The term “employer” means an employer as defined in the act and part 202 of this chapter.
( c ) *Employee.* The term “employee” means an employee as defined in the act and part 203 of this chapter.
( d ) *Service.* The term “service” means service as defined in the act and part 220 of this chapter.
( e ) *Compensation.* The term “compensation” means compensation as defined in the act and part 222 of this chapter.
( f ) *Board.* The term “Board” means the Railroad Retirement Board.
( g ) *Company.* The term “company” means a partnership, association, joint stock company, corporation, or institution.
( h ) *United States.* The term “United States” where used in a geographical sense means the States and the District of Columbia.
( i ) *Carrier.* The term “carrier” means an express company, sleeping-car company, or carrier by railroad, subject to part I of the Interstate Commerce Act (24 Stat. 379; 49 U.S.C. chapter 1).
( j ) *Person.* The term “person” includes an individual, trust, estate, partnership, association, joint stock company, company, corporation, and institution.
( k ) *General Committee.* The term “General Committee” as used in section 1 of the Railroad Retirement Act of 1937 (50 Stat. 307; 45 U.S.C., Sup., 228a) is construed to include any subordinate unit of a national railway labor organization, defined as an employer in the 1937 act, regardless of the title or designation of such unit, which, under the constitution and bylaws of the organization of which it is a unit, is properly authorized to and does represent that organization on all of a particular railroad or on a substantial portion thereof (such as on that portion of a railroad under the jurisdiction of the general manager) in negotiating with the management of that railroad with respect to the wages and working conditions of the employees represented by such organization.
( l ) *Local lodges and divisions; local lodge or division.* The term “local lodges and divisions” and the term “local lodge or division” as used in section 1(a) and 1(b), respectively, of the 1937 act, shall be construed to include any subordinate unit of a national railway labor organization defined as an “employer” under the 1937 act, which unit functions in the same manner as, or similar to “local lodges” as that term is ordinarily used, irrespective of the designation of such unit by its national organization.
[4 FR 1477, Apr. 7, 1939, as amended by Board Order 40-367, 5 FR 2717, Aug. 1, 1940; Board Order 59-190, 24 FR 9083, Nov. 7, 1959]
§ 1002.305 What court has jurisdiction in an action against a State or private employer? ( a ) If an action is brought against a State or private employer by the Attorney General, the district courts of the United States have jurisdiction over the action. If the action is brought against a State by the Attorney General, it must be brought in the name of the United States as the plaintiff in the action.
( b ) If an action is brought against a State by a person, the action may be brought in a State court of competent jurisdiction according to the laws of the State.
( c ) If an action is brought against a private employer or a political subdivision of a State by a person, the district courts of the United States have jurisdiction over the action.
( d ) An action brought against a State Adjutant General, as an employer of a civilian National Guard technician, is considered an action against a State for purposes of determining which court has jurisdiction.
```

[Congressional Bills 114th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 3876 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

114th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 3876

     To protect consumer privacy during the development and use of 
                    autonomous vehicle technologies.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            November 2, 2015

   Ms. Meng introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
             Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
     To protect consumer privacy during the development and use of 
                    autonomous vehicle technologies.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Autonomous Vehicle Privacy 
Protection Act of 2015''.

SEC. 2. GAO REPORT.

    The Comptroller General of the United States shall make available 
to the public a report that assesses the organizational readiness of 
the Department of Transportation to address autonomous vehicle 
technology challenges, including consumer privacy protections.
                                 <all>
```
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Mario SAENZ-CHAPA, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 06-40243

Conference Calendar.

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.

July 13, 2006.

James Lee Turner, Assistant U.S. Attorney, U.S. Attorney’s Office, Southern District of Texas, Houston, TX, for PlaintiffAppellee.

Thomas S. Berg, Timothy William Crooks, Assistant Federal Public Defender, Marjorie A. Meyers, Federal Public Defender, H. Michael Sokolow, Federal Public Defender’s Office, Southern District of Texas, Houston, TX, for Defendant-Appellant.

Before DAVIS, BARKSDALE, and DeMOSS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: *

Appealing the Judgment in a Criminal Case, Mario Saenz-Chapa raises arguments that are foreclosed by *AlmendarezTorres v. United States,*523 U.S. 224, 235, 118 S.Ct. 1219, 140 L.Ed.2d 350 (1998), which held that 8 U.S.C. § 1326(b)(2) is a penalty provision and not a separate criminal offense. The Government’s motion for summary affirmance is GRANTED, and the judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.

*

 Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.