alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
I 

114TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 3916 

To prohibit entities from using Federal funds to contribute to political 

campaigns or participate in lobbying activities. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

NOVEMBER 3, 2015 

Ms. TSONGAS introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on the Judiciary, and in addition to the Committee on House Administration, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, 

in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned 

A BILL 

To prohibit entities from using Federal funds to contribute 

to political campaigns or participate in lobbying activities. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘No Taxpayer Money 

5 for Corporate Campaigns Act of 2015’’. 


emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 3916 IH

1 SEC. 2. PROHIBITION ON THE USE OF FEDERAL FUNDS FOR 

2 CAMPAIGN AND LOBBYING ACTIVITIES. 

3 (a) PROHIBITION.—With respect to Federal funds re4 ceived by an entity, other than a natural person, it shall 

5 be unlawful for such entity to— 

6 (1) use such funds to advocate the election or 

7 defeat of a political candidate; 

8 (2) use such funds for voter registration activi9 ties or get-out-the-vote activities; 

10 (3) use such funds to engage in any lobbying 

11 activity; or 

12 (4) donate such funds to any entity that advo13 cates for the election or defeat of a political can14 didate or engages in lobbying activities. 

15 (b) EXCEPTION FOR ACTIVITIES AUTHORIZED BY

16 LAW.—Subsection (a) does not apply to the use of funds 

17 by an entity for an activity specifically authorized by Fed18 eral law, rule, or regulation. 

Æ 


emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with BILLS
# C_2012171EN.01002801.xml

| 16.6.2012 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 171/28 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

16.6.2012

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 171/28

---

Corrigendum to the summary of European Union decisions on marketing authorisations in respect of medicinal products from 1 March 2012 to 31 March 2012

(
  Official Journal of the European Union C 124 of 27 April 2012
  )

Official Journal of the European Union C 124 of 27 April 2012

2012/C 171/14

On page 3, in the table, after the entry for NutropinAq, the following row is inserted:

| ‘2.3.2012 | Omnitrope | Sandoz GmbH |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Biochemiestrasse 10, |
| Kundl 6250, |
| Österreich |

‘2.3.2012

Omnitrope

Sandoz GmbH

Biochemiestrasse 10,

Kundl 6250,

Österreich

EU/1/06/332/001-012

6.3.2012’

on page 9, the following is deleted:

‘—   Suspension of a marketing authorization (Article 20 of Regulation (EC) No 726/2004 of the European Parliament and of the Council)

| Date of the decision | Name of the medicinal product | Holder of the marketing authorization | Number of the entry in the Community Register | Date of notification |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 2.3.2012 | Omnitrope | Sandoz GmbH |
| Biochemiestrasse 10, |
| Kundl 6250, |
| Österreich |

Date of the decision

Name of the medicinal product

Holder of the marketing authorization

Number of the entry in the Community Register

Date of notification

2.3.2012

Omnitrope

Sandoz GmbH

Biochemiestrasse 10,

Kundl 6250,

Österreich

EU/1/06/332/001-012

6.3.2012’

---
Appendix F: Administrative Unit Maps

National Forests in Mississippi Land and Resource Management Plan

Map 1 – Bienville Geographic Area RCW Habitat Management Area
Appendix F: Administrative Unit Maps

National Forests in Mississippi Land and Resource Management Plan

Map 2 – Bienville Geographic Area Ecological Systems
Appendix F: Administrative Unit Maps

National Forests in Mississippi Land and Resource Management Plan

Map 3 – Bienville Geographic Area Fire Use Suitability Classification
Appendix F: Administrative Unit Maps

National Forests in Mississippi Land and Resource Management Plan

Map 4 – Bienville Geographic Area Minerals Suitability Classification
Appendix F: Administrative Unit Maps

National Forests in Mississippi Land and Resource Management Plan

Map 5 – Bienville Geographic Area Recreation Suitability Classification
Appendix F: Administrative Unit Maps

National Forests in Mississippi Land and Resource Management Plan

Map 6 – Bienville Geographic Area Special Uses Suitability Classification
Appendix F: Administrative Unit Maps

National Forests in Mississippi Land and Resource Management Plan

Map 7 – Bienville Geographic Area Timber Suitability Classification
Appendix F: Administrative Unit Maps

National Forests in Mississippi Land and Resource Management Plan

Map 8 – Bienville Pines Scenic Area, Bienville NF
Appendix F: Administrative Unit Maps

National Forests in Mississippi Land and Resource Management Plan

Map 8v – Bienville Pines Scenic Area Vicinity Map, Bienville NF
Appendix F: Administrative Unit Maps

National Forests in Mississippi Land and Resource Management Plan

Map 9 – Harrell Prairie Botanical Area, Bienville NF
Appendix F: Administrative Unit Maps

National Forests in Mississippi Land and Resource Management Plan

Map 9v – Harrell Prairie Botanical Area Vicinity Map, Bienville NF
Appendix F: Administrative Unit Maps

National Forests in Mississippi Land and Resource Management Plan

Map 10 – Nutmeg Hickory Research Natural Area, Bienville NF
Appendix F: Administrative Unit Maps

National Forests in Mississippi Land and Resource Management Plan

Map 10v – Nutmeg Hickory Research Natural Area Vicinity Map, Bienville NF
§ 7.124 Disparaging statements. ( a ) *General.* Malt beverage labels, containers, or packaging may not contain any false or misleading statement that explicitly or implicitly disparages a competitor's product.
( b ) *Truthful and accurate comparisons.* This section does not prevent truthful and accurate comparisons between products (such as “Our ale contains more hops than Brand X”) or statements of opinion (such as “We think our beer tastes better than any other beer on the market”).
###### Editorial Note on Part 71

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 71 appear by T.D. ATF-414, 64 FR 49084, Sept. 10, 1999and T.D. ATF-463, 66 FR 42734, 42735, Aug. 15, 2001.

#### § 71.37 Notice of contemplated action.

Where the appropriate TTB officer believes that the matter may be settled informally, i.e., without formal administrative proceedings, he shall, in accordance with section 5 (b) of the Administrative Procedure Act, prior to the issuance of a citation, inform the permittee of the contemplated issuance of an order to show cause why his permit should not be suspended, revoked or annulled, and that he is being given an opportunity for the submission and consideration of facts, arguments, offers of settlement, or proposals of adjustment. The notice should inform the permittee of the charges on which the citation would be based, if issued, and afford him a period of 10 days from the date of the notice, or such longer period as the appropriate TTB officer deems necessary, in which to submit proposals of settlement to the appropriate TTB officer. Where informal settlement is not reached promptly because of inaction of the permittee or proposals are made for the purpose of delay, a citation shall be issued in accordance with §§ 71.55 and 71.56.

[21 FR 1441, Mar. 6, 1956. Redesignated at 40 FR 16835, Apr. 15, 1975, and amended by T.D. ATF-199, 50 FR 9196, Mar. 6, 1985; T.D. ATF-244, 51 FR 45763, Dec. 22, 1986; T.D. ATF-374, 61 FR 29957, June 13, 1996]
## ATTACHMENT HEADER SHEET Attachment Number009 Attachment Name Attachment 9CaCoPbTiWO Process Flow



## Associated PMN Section Number Pt.2,Sec.A, 1d. (#2) Doesnotcontain CBI



## Report Number coNSi1031778685535100 00x0U 6O u 0/ I 

## zC

I 

### C d 

# od 0
66 -c 

# ot 51 4- 1 - jcz 0 

### 0 

### 0 P. O 

### C',~ 

## 0-4-
0 00

u cn
00 0- 0 

### 0 U~ 0 to AI Z 

## 5b 0~ 

### (U S 00C14tr0 0 000 000 00 

## ~0 o 0 1-4' c j 0 >> 0 cd 

### C) M 0 

### E 

## 0 0 ' (;n COO 

## 0

, 0 CD 

### -155 c (U 0 

## o -E 

## 0 00 0 * n 0 . 000 

## 0 X -P- 0 *-- 

## 0 4 S j 0 

### 4m CC UU

0o 0
*b t00 00 C) 

# z 0



# I

cJcl



### c. raj 

# oq >0 / o CL9. 0 Q) 

# =in : . t U) U) cq 0 0 0 , UC
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1998
<CASH>                                           47063
<SECURITIES>                                    169605
<RECEIVABLES>                                    11511
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  228179
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                          1000
<OTHER-SE>                                      227179
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    228179
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                  1184
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                  1184
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                      0
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                         0
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
Exhibit 10.2

 

ASSUMPTION AGREEMENT

 

This Agreement is made as of June 29, 2015, by Integrys Holding, Inc. (f/k/a GET Acquisition Corp.), a Wisconsin corporation (the “Company”), for the benefit of the banks, financial institutions, and other institutional lenders parties to the Credit Agreement referred to below (collectively, the “Lenders”), and JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A., as agent (the “Administrative Agent”) for the Lenders.

 

PRELIMINARY STATEMENTS:

 

(1)                                 Integrys Energy Group, Inc., a Wisconsin corporation (“Integrys”), the Lenders and the Administrative Agent have entered into a Five-Year Credit Agreement dated as of May 8, 2014 (the “Credit Agreement”).  Capitalized terms not otherwise defined in this Agreement have the same meanings as specified in the Credit Agreement.

 

(2)                                 Integrys entered into an Agreement and Plan of Merger dated as of June 22, 2014, pursuant to which:

 

(a)                                 Integrys will merge with WEC Acquisition Corp., a Wisconsin corporation, which is a wholly-owned subsidiary of Wisconsin Energy Corporation, with Integrys as the surviving entity (the “Initial Merger”), and

 

(b)                                 After the Initial Merger, the surviving entity in the Initial Merger will merge with and into the Company, which is another wholly-owned subsidiary of Wisconsin Energy Corporation, with the Company as the surviving entity (the “Second Merger”).

 

(3)                                 The Company wishes to expressly assume all of the obligations of Integrys pursuant to the Credit Agreement.

 

Section 1.                                           Assumption.  The Company hereby expressly assumes and agrees to pay and perform when due each and every obligation of Integrys pursuant to the Credit Agreement and the Notes, with the same effect as if the Company were the original Borrower thereunder, which assumption shall become effective at the date and time that the Second Merger becomes effective.

 

Section 2.                                           Waiver of Acceptance.  The Company hereby waives acceptance of this Agreement by the Lenders and the Administrative Agent.

 

Section 3.                                           Governing Law.  This Agreement and the rights and obligations of the parties hereunder shall be governed by and construed and interpreted in accordance with the laws of the State of New York.

 

[Signature Page Follows]

 











 

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, Integrys Holding, Inc. has caused this Agreement to be duly executed and delivered as of the date first above written.

 

	
 
    	
INTEGRYS   HOLDING, INC.
    
	
 
    	
 
    
	
 
    	
 
    
	
 
    	
By:
    	
/s/   Scott J. Lauber
    
	
 
    	
Name:   Scott J. Lauber
    
	
 
    	
Title:Vice   President and Treasurer
I 

114TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 3903 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to extend for one year the 

credit for qualified fuel cell property. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

NOVEMBER 3, 2015 

Mr. GRAYSON introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Ways and Means 

A BILL 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to extend 

for one year the credit for qualified fuel cell property. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. EXTENSION OF CREDIT FOR QUALIFIED FUEL 

4 CELL PROPERTY. 

5 (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 48(c)(1)(D) of the Inter6 nal Revenue Code of 1986 is amended by striking ‘‘De7 cember 31, 2016’’ and inserting ‘‘December 31, 2017’’. 

8 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendments made by 

9 this section shall apply to periods after December 31, 

10 2016, in taxable years ending after such date, under rules 


emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 3903 IH

1 similar to the rules of section 48(m) of the Internal Rev2 enue Code of 1986 (as in effect on the day before the date 

3 of the enactment of Revenue Reconciliation Act of 1990). 

Æ 


emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with BILLS
484 P.2d 328

#### Myrtle E. PACHECO, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Luis PACHECO, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 9156.

Supreme Court of New Mexico.

April 26, 1971.

Branch & Dickson, Albuquerque, for defendant-appellant.

Abner Schreiber, Los Alamos, for plaintiff-appellee.

OPINION

TACKETT, Justice.

This is an appeal of an order entered by the District Court of Los Alamos County, New Mexico. After hearing on an order to show cause, the defendant Pacheco was found in contempt of court for failure to pay child support. Judgment was entered against Pacheco for $16,000 for arrearage of child support. The sentence on contempt was held in abeyance for a period of thirty days to allow Pacheco to purge himself of the contempt. This he did not do but immediately appealed.

There being no final order entered in this case by the tidal court, this court is without jurisdiction in the matter.

While the jurisdictional question was not raised by either party, an appellate court will and should, on its own motion, raise lack of jurisdiction where an order lacks finality due to an absence of the necessary determination and order of the trial court. Aetna Casualty & Surety Company v. Miles, 80 N.M. 237, 453 P.2d 757 (1969).

The appeal is dismissed.

It is so ordered.

OMAN and STEPHENSON, JJ, concur.
§ 10.206 May an employee who uses leave after an injury later decide to use COP instead? On Form CA-1, an employee may elect to use accumulated sick or annual leave, or leave advanced by the agency, instead of electing COP. The employee can change the election between leave and COP for prospective periods at any point while eligibility for COP remains. The employee may also change the election for past periods and request COP in lieu of leave already taken for the same period. In either situation, the following provisions apply: ( a ) The request must be made to the employer within one year of the date the leave was used or the date of the written approval of the claim by OWCP (if written approval is issued), whichever is later.
( b ) Where the employee is otherwise eligible, the agency shall restore leave taken in lieu of any of the 45 COP days. Where any of the 45 COP days remain unused, the agency shall continue pay prospectively.
( c ) The use of leave may not be used to delay or extend the 45-day COP period or to otherwise affect the time limitation as provided by 5 U.S.C. 8117. Therefore, any leave used during the period of eligibility counts towards the 45-day maximum entitlement to COP.
Exhibit 13.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. §1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the annual report of Dejour Energy Inc. (the Company) on Form 20-F for the fiscal
year ended December 31, 2012 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Robert Hodgkinson, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:

(1) The Report fully
complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information
contained in this Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



/s/ Robert HodgkinsonRobert HodgkinsonChief Executive OfficerPrincipal Executive OfficerApril 25, 2013


A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will
be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request. The foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350 and is not being filed as part of the annual report
or as a separate disclosure document.



100
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND

CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF
THE

SARBANES-OXLEY ACT

The certification set forth below is being submitted in connection with Warner Chilcott Limiteds Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2008 (the Annual Report) for the purpose of complying with
Rule 13a-14(b) or Rule 15d-14(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the Exchange Act) and Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the United States Code.

Roger M. Boissonneault, the Chief Executive Officer and Paul Herendeen, the Chief Financial Officer of Warner Chilcott Limited, each certifies that, to
the best of his knowledge:



| | 1. | the Annual Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Exchange Act; and
| | -- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | the information contained in the Annual Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Warner Chilcott Limited.
| | -- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Date: February 27, 2009



/s/ Roger M. BoissonneaultName: Roger M. Boissonneault Title: President and Chief
Executive Officer




/s/ Paul HerendeenName: Paul Herendeen Title: Executive Vice President and
Chief Financial Officer


A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document
authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to Warner Chilcott Limited and will be retained by
Warner Chilcott Limited and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
### §1140d. Rule of construction

Nothing in this subpart shall be construed to impose any additional duty, obligation, or responsibility on an institution of higher education or on the institution's faculty, administrators, or staff than is required under section 794 of title 29 and the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990 (42 U.S.C. 12101 et seq.).

(Pub. L. 89–329, title VII, §764, as added Pub. L. 110–315, title VII, §709(2), Aug. 14, 2008, 122 Stat. 3365.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

The Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990, referred to in text, is Pub. L. 101–336, July 26, 1990, 104 Stat. 327, which is classified principally to chapter 126 (§12101 et seq.) of Title 42, The Public Health and Welfare. For complete classification of this Act to the Code, see Short Title note set out under section 12101 of Title 42 and Tables.

#### Prior Provisions

A prior section 1140d, Pub. L. 89–329, title VII, §765, as added Pub. L. 105–244, title VII, §701, Oct. 7, 1998, 112 Stat. 1803, authorized appropriations, prior to repeal by Pub. L. 110–315, title VII, §709(2), Aug. 14, 2008, 122 Stat. 3361.

A prior section 764 of Pub. L. 89–329 was classified to section 1140c of this title, prior to repeal by Pub. L. 110–315.

Another prior section 764 of Pub. L. 89–329 was classified to section 1132g–3 of this title, prior to repeal by Pub. L. 102–325.

Another prior section 764 of Pub. L. 89–329 was classified to section 1132d–3 of this title, prior to the general amendment of this subchapter by Pub. L. 96–374.
#### Thomas E. GAGHAN, Jr., Petitioner, v. OFFICE OF PERSONNEL MANAGEMENT, Respondent.

No. 2006-3286.

United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit.

July 25, 2006.

Thomas E. Gaghan, Jr., pro se.

ORDER

Order Vacated, See 2006 WL 2572113.

The petitioner having failed to file the required Statement Concerning Discrimination, it is

ORDERED that the petition for review be, and the same hereby is, DISMISSED, for failure to prosecute in accordance with the rules.