alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

DAY ELEV

 123.42

 123.32

 123.32

 123.38

 123.22

 123.23

 123.46

 123.73

 123.83

 124.04

 124.02

 124.24

 124.68

 123.24

 122.67

 122.51

 122.98

 123.65

 123.30

 123.18

 122.76

 123.03

 123.81

 123.45

 123.68

 123.42

 123.52

 123.61

 123.49

 123.54

 7,988

 7,941

 7,941

 7,970

 7,894

 7,899

 8,007

 8,134

 8,181

 8,281

 8,271

 8,381

 8,601

 7,904

 7,643

 7,571

 7,782

 8,097

 7,932

 7,876

 7,683

 7,805

 8,172

 8,003

 8,111

 7,988

 8,035

 8,078

 8,021

 8,045

STORAGE

-113

-47

+0

+29

-76

+5

+108

+127

+47

+100

-10

+110

+220

-697

-261

-72

+211

+315

-165

-56

-193

+122

+367

-169

+108

-123

+47

+43

-57

+24

CHANGE

1,514

1,521

1,534

1,584

1,531

1,567

1,625

1,613

1,579

1,615

1,535

1,609

1,650

1,200

1,400

1,507

1,649

1,701

1,359

1,519

1,450

1,617

1,744

1,454

1,590

1,465

1,549

1,562

1,519

1,544

INFLOW

 1,472

 1,442

 1,431

 1,466

 1,466

 1,459

 1,463

 1,441

 1,447

 1,458

 1,440

 1,452

 1,437

 1,449

 1,431

 1,440

 1,440

 1,439

 1,341

 1,444

 1,445

 1,453

 1,457

 1,426

 1,434

 1,436

 1,423

 1,438

 1,446

 1,426

POWER

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

SPILL

 60

 60

 60

 60

 60

 60

 60

 60

 60

 60

 59

 60

 60

 60

 60

 60

 60

 60

 60

 60

 60

 60

 60

 61

 60

 54

 60

 60

 60

 60

HATCHERY

 2

 3

 3

 3

 3

 3

 3

 3

 3

 3

 2

 2

 2

 2

 1

 3

 3

 3

 1

 3

 2

 2

 2

 3

 2

 1

 2

 2

 2

 6

C.F.S.

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

SEPTEMBER 2001 LAKE NATOMA DAILY OPERATIONS RUN DATE: October 26, 2001

IN LAKE

EVAP

C.F.S.

COMPUTED*

ACRE-FEET

RELEASE - C.F.S.

TOTALS -56 46,306 43,242 0 1,794 75

ACRE-FEET -56 91,848 85,771 0 3,558 149

COMMENTS:

* COMPUTED INFLOW IS THE SUM OF CHANGE IN STORAGE, RELEASES AND EVAPORATION.

SUMMARY

RELEASES (ACRE-FEET)

POWER 85,771

SPILL 0

FOLSOM SOUTH CANAL

HATCHERY

 2,424

 3,558

 8,101

FOLSOM

SOUTH 

CANAL

 37

 40

 40

 40

 40

 42

 45

 45

 45

 44

 39

 40

 40

 40

 40

 40

 40

 40

 40

 40

 40

 40

 40

 49

 40

 36

 40

 40

 40

 40

 1,222

 2,424

(1)

(1) INCHES OF EVAPORATION TAKEN FROM FOLSOM PAN.

RELEASES (ACRE-FEET)

TOTAL 91,753

Table 12
# C_2012363EN.01000301.xml

| 23.11.2012 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 363/3 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

23.11.2012

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 363/3

---

State aids — Decisions to propose appropriate measures pursuant to Article 108(1) of the TFEU where the Member State concerned has accepted those measures

(Text with EEA relevance)

2012/C 363/02

| Date of adoption of the decision | 25.7.2012 |
| --- | --- |
| Reference number of the aid | SA.18879 (E 6/06) |
| Member State | Ireland |
| Region | — |
| Title (and/or name of the beneficiary) | Unlimited guarantee in favour of the Voluntary Health Insurance Board (the VHI) |
| Legal basis | Voluntary Health Insurance Act 1957 |
| Type of measure | Individual aid |
| Objective | Insurance |
| Form of aid | Guarantee |
| Budget | — |
| Intensity | — |
| Duration (period) | Until 31.12.2013 |
| Economic sectors | Service activities |
| Name and address of the granting authority | Irish Government |
| Hawkins Street |
| Dublin 2 |
| IRELAND |
| http://www.dohc.ie |

Date of adoption of the decision

25.7.2012

Reference number of the aid

SA.18879 (E 6/06)

Member State

Ireland

Region

—

Title (and/or name of the beneficiary)

Unlimited guarantee in favour of the Voluntary Health Insurance Board (the VHI)

Legal basis

Voluntary Health Insurance Act 1957

Type of measure

Individual aid

Objective

Insurance

Form of aid

Guarantee

Budget

—

Intensity

—

Duration (period)

Until 31.12.2013

Economic sectors

Service activities

Name and address of the granting authority

Irish Government

Hawkins Street

Dublin 2

IRELAND

http://www.dohc.ie

Other information

Acceptance by Ireland of the proposal for appropriate measures made by the Commission in accordance with Article 108(1) of the TFEU and Articles 18 and 19 of Regulation (EC) No 659/1999 (1)

1

The Commission decided to propose appropriate measures to Ireland in relation to the unlimited guarantee in favour of the Voluntary Health Insurance Board (VHI). Ireland gave its explicit and unconditional agreement to the proposed appropriate measures in writing.

Pursuant to Article 19(1) of Regulation (EC) No 659/1999, the Commission hereby takes note of the unconditional and explicit agreement of Ireland to the appropriate measures which it has proposed.

The authentic text(s) of the decision, from which all confidential information has been removed, can be found at:

http://ec.europa.eu/competition/elojade/isef/index.cfm

---

(1)  Council Regulation (EC) No 659/1999 of 22 March 1999 laying down detailed rules for the application of Article 93 (now Article 88) of the EC Treaty, OJ L 83, 27.3.1999, p. 1.

1

---
xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?


C\_2012028EN.01000101.xml


| | | | |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 1.2.2012 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 28/1 |

---

Information communicated by Member States regarding State aid granted under Commission Regulation (EC) No 800/2008 declaring certain categories of aid compatible with the common market in application of Articles 87 and 88 of the Treaty (General Block Exemption Regulation)

(Text with EEA relevance)

2012/C 28/01

| | | |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Reference number of the State Aid | SA.30544 (X 124/10) | |
| Member State | Italy | |
| Member State reference number | — | |
| Name of the Region (NUTS) | CALABRIA Article 107(3)(a) | |
| Granting authority | | | | --- | | REGIONE CALABRIA — DIPARTIMENTO LAVORO E FORMAZIONE PROFESSIONALE | | VIA LUCREZIA DELLA VALLE CATANZARO | | www.regione.calabria.it/calabriaeuropa/ | | |
| Title of the aid measure | POR CALABRIA 2007/2013 — ASSE ADATTABILITA' OBIETTIVO SPECIFICO A — avviso pubblico per la presentazione di progetti per la formazione continua dei lavoratori delle micro, piccole e medie imprese e delle grande imprese come rettificato con Decreto ... | |
| National legal basis (Reference to the relevant national official publication) | BURC calabria | |
| Type of measure | Scheme | |
| Amendment of an existing aid measure | — | |
| Duration | 17.2.2010-31.12.2013 | |
| Economic sector(s) concerned | MANUFACTURING, ACCOMMODATION AND FOOD SERVICE ACTIVITIES, INFORMATION AND COMMUNICATION, FINANCIAL AND INSURANCE ACTIVITIES, PROFESSIONAL, SCIENTIFIC AND TECHNICAL ACTIVITIES | |
| Type of beneficiary | SME | |
| Annual overall amount of the budget planned under the scheme | EUR 10,00 (in millions) | |
| For guarantees | — | |
| Aid Instrument (Article 5) | Direct grant | |
| Reference to the Commission Decision | — | |
| If co-financed by Community funds | por calabria 2007/2013 — asse adattabilità — obiettivo specifico A. — EUR 10,00 (in millions) | |
| Objectives | Maximum aid intensity in % or Maximum aid amount in national currency | SME-bonuses in % |
| Specific training (Art. 38(1)) | 25 % | 10 % |
| General training (Art. 38(2)) | 60 % | 20 % |

Web link to the full text of the aid measure:

http://www.regione.calabria.it/formazionelavoro

---
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY HIGH

 136

 134

 137

 146

 148

 148

 152

 154

 154

 163

 170

 160

 155

 159

 160

 157

 159

 178

 194

 230

 251

 238

 262

 248

 242

 241

 244

 235

 210

 175

 172

 132

 130

 130

 132

 133

 142

 146

 146

 146

 147

 148

 150

 152

 145

 155

 155

 155

 155

 142

 156

 155

 155

 153

 154

 155

 159

 163

 165

 166

 169

 166

 133

 132

 132

 138

 144

 147

 148

 148

 148

 150

 151

 153

 154

 155

 156

 156

 156

 156

 158

 164

 169

 166

 170

 169

 169

 172

 176

 174

 173

 170

 168

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

AUGUST 2018 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: September 6, 2018

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

RIO VISTA ON THE SACRAMENTO RIVER
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY HIGH

 6,450

 10,633

 11,519

 18,280

 15,932

 11,741

 9,459

 5,246

 2,877

 1,605

 1,035

 879

 1,072

 2,524

 2,723

 2,493

 3,193

 6,671

 10,340

 12,161

 12,808

 12,367

 10,865

 11,506

 9,969

 9,657

 9,913

 8,733

 12,032

 12,712

 12,869

 409

 369

 364

 3,692

 1,571

 1,211

 608

 561

 420

 402

 343

 341

 295

 307

 280

 266

 254

 258

 345

 1,702

 2,819

 2,976

 2,564

 3,226

 3,008

 2,610

 2,019

 2,294

 2,115

 1,954

 1,934

 1,772

 2,879

 3,736

 8,715

 8,105

 6,222

 4,422

 2,549

 1,442

 815

 608

 514

 489

 641

 630

 638

 866

 2,202

 4,448

 6,508

 7,257

 7,668

 6,793

 6,859

 6,212

 5,739

 5,431

 5,348

 6,133

 6,100

 6,936

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

MARCH 2001 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: April 9, 2001

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

PORT CHICAGO TOP IN SUISUN BAY
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
 WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549
 
 FORM 8-K
 
 CURRENT REPORT
PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15 (d) OF THE
SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
 Date of report (Date of earliest event reported): June 28, 2011
 DORAL FINANCIAL CORPORATION
  Puerto Rico
(State or Other Jurisdiction of Incorporation)
    
    001-31579
(Commission File Number)
    
    66-031262
(IRS Employer Identification No.)
 
  
  o
 o
 o
 o




---



##### 



Item 5.07 Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders.
  Proposal 1
  Election of Directors-Nominees
    
    Votes For
    
    
    Votes Withheld
    
    
    Broker Non-VotesDennis G. Buchert
    
    
    74,021,719
    
    
    
    6,086,753
    
    
    
    27,477,064James E. Gilleran
    
    
    74,321,679
    
    
    
    5,786,793
    
    
    
    27,477,064Douglas L. Jacobs
    
    
    74,330,227
    
    
    
    5,778,245
    
    
    
    27,477,064David E. King
    
    
    70,759,071
    
    
    
    9,349,401
    
    
    
    27,477,064Gerard L. Smith
    
    
    74,324,099
    
    
    
    5,784,373
    
    
    
    27,477,064Glen R. Wakeman
    
    
    78,711,092
    
    
    
    1,397,380
    
    
    
    27,477,064
 Proposal 2
  For:
    
    
    105,059,483Against:
    
    
    386,113Abstain:
    
    
    2,139,940Broker Non-Votes:
    
    
    0
 Proposal 3
  For:
    
    
    39,425,812Against:
    
    
    23,288,752Abstain:
    
    
    17,393,908Broker Non-Votes:
    
    
    27,477,064
 Proposal 4
  One (1) Year:
    
    
    70,161,708Two (2) Years:
    
    
    80,570Three (3) years:
    
    
    2,505,511Abstain:
    
    
    7,360,683Broker Non-Votes:
    
    
    27,477,064




---



##### 



SIGNATURES
  DORAL FINANCIAL CORPORATIONDate: June 29, 2011
    By:
    /s/ Enrique R. UbarriName:
    Enrique R. UbarriTitle:
    Executive Vice President and
General Counsel
§ 1011.120 Under what circumstances will VETS find an employer ineligible to receive a HIRE Vets Medallion Award for a violation of labor law? ( a ) Any employer with an adverse labor law decision, stipulated agreement, contract debarment, or contract termination, as defined in paragraphs (b) through (e) of this section, pursuant to either of the following labor laws, as amended, will not be eligible to receive an award: ( 1 ) Uniformed Services Employment and Reemployment Rights Act (USERRA); or
( 2 ) Vietnam Era Veterans' Readjustment Assistance Act (VEVRAA);
( b ) For purposes of this section, an adverse labor law decision means any of the following, issued in the calendar year prior to year in which applications are solicited or the calendar year in which applications are solicited up until the issuance of the award, in which a violation of any of the laws in paragraph (a) of this section is found: ( 1 ) A civil or criminal judgment;
( 2 ) A final administrative merits determination of an administrative adjudicative board or commission; or
( 3 ) A decision of an administrative law judge or other administrative judge that is not appealed and that becomes the final agency action.
( c ) For purposes of this section, a stipulated agreement means any agreement (including a settlement agreement, conciliation agreement, consent decree, or other similar document) to which the employer is a party, entered into in the calendar year prior to the year in which applications are solicited or the calendar year in which applications are solicited up until the issuance of the award, that contains an admission that the employer violated either of the laws cited in paragraph (a) of this section.
( d ) For purposes of this section, a contract debarment means any order or voluntary agreement, pursuant to the laws listed in paragraph (a) of this section, that debars the employer from receiving any future Federal contract. Employers shall be ineligible for an award for the duration of time that the contract debarment is in effect.
( e ) For purposes of this section, a contract termination means any order or voluntary agreement, pursuant to the laws listed in paragraph (a) of this section, that terminates an existing Federal contract prior to its completion. Employers shall be ineligible for the award if this termination occurred in the calendar year prior to the year in which applications are solicited or the calendar year in which applications are solicited up until the issuance of the award.
( f ) VETS may delay issuing an award to an employer if, at the time the award is to be issued, VETS has credible information that a significant violation of one of the laws in paragraph (a) of this section may have occurred that could lead to an employer being disqualified pursuant to any of paragraphs (b) through (e) of this section.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY HIGH

 3,882

 4,309

 4,549

 4,475

 5,683

 6,727

 7,363

 9,466

 10,691

 11,674

 11,174

 10,748

 9,445

 8,625

 8,737

 8,370

 9,188

 10,101

 9,401

 9,382

 8,012

 9,070

 8,606

 9,034

 9,550

 9,972

 9,407

 8,996

 8,076

 7,524

 6,762

 727

 805

 889

 1,003

 1,093

 1,176

 1,192

 1,572

 1,870

 2,144

 2,193

 2,183

 1,712

 1,551

 1,628

 2,266

 3,277

 3,225

 2,278

 1,902

 1,551

 1,459

 1,262

 1,214

 1,146

 1,159

 1,397

 1,541

 1,809

 1,404

 1,507

 2,238

 2,361

 2,227

 2,268

 2,706

 2,890

 3,205

 4,400

 5,541

 6,190

 6,110

 6,024

 5,573

 5,229

 5,053

 5,144

 5,691

 5,976

 5,090

 4,372

 4,089

 4,182

 3,931

 4,013

 4,160

 4,408

 4,607

 4,780

 5,010

 4,493

 3,981

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

MAY 2020 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: June 2, 2020

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

PITTSBURG BOTTOM ON THE SACRAMENTO RIVER
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY HIGH

 3,797

 7,440

 10,078

 10,846

 12,035

 11,037

 8,072

 3,216

 1,121

 628

 479

 275

 232

 226

 236

 205

 186

 207

 174

 170

 167

 170

 171

 168

 171

 225

 252

 190

 188

 186

 185

 540

 747

 1,036

 2,057

 3,506

 2,800

 1,128

 753

 501

 353

 250

 214

 192

 185

 174

 154

 161

 160

 155

 156

 152

 157

 162

 162

 161

 164

 176

 172

 169

 168

 171

 1,362

 2,873

 4,893

 5,874

 7,416

 6,993

 4,416

 1,575

 679

 468

 327

 241

 213

 203

 201

 180

 175

 174

 167

 163

 160

 163

 166

 165

 165

 172

 201

 181

 177

 175

 177

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

MARCH 2016 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: April 12, 2016

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

PITTSBURG BOTTOM ON THE SACRAMENTO RIVER
§ 404.1901 Introduction. ( a ) Under section 233 of the Social Security Act, the President may enter into an agreement establishing a totalization arrangement between the social security system of the United States and the social security system of a foreign country. An agreement permits entitlement to and the amount of old-age, survivors, disability, or derivative benefits to be based on a combination of a person's periods of coverage under the social security system of the United States and the social security system of the foreign country. An agreement also provides for the precluding of dual coverage and dual social security taxation for work covered under both systems. An agreement may provide that the provisions of the social security system of each country will apply equally to the nationals of both countries (regardless of where they reside). For this purpose, refugees, stateless persons, and other nonnationals who derive benefit rights from nationals, refugees, or stateless persons may be treated as nationals if they reside within one of the countries.
( b ) The regulations in this subpart provide definitions and principles for the negotiation and administration of totalization agreements. Where necessary to accomplish the purposes of totalization, we will apply these definitions and principles, as appropriate and within the limits of the law, to accommodate the widely diverse characteristics of foreign social security systems.
(No. 6890

#### International Salt Company, Claimant, vs. State of Illinois, Department of Transportation, Respondent.

*Opinion filed February 28, 1974.*

International Salt Company, *Claimant, pro se.*

William J. Scott, Attorney General; Douglas G. Olson, Assistant Attorney General, for Respondent.

Per Curiam.
EXHIBIT 99.1 - ANNUAL FUNDS APPLICATION STATEMENT




                              [LOGO] JPMORGAN


June 30, 2005

    Hartford Life Global Funding Trusts - Annual Funds Application Statement

I, Albert P. Mari, Jr., being a duly appointed officer of JPMorgan Chase Bank,
N.A. ("Indenture Trustee"), do hereby certify on behalf of the Indenture
Trustee, that, with respect to Hartford Life Global Funding Trust 2005-049:





         1. I have reviewed and examined the application by the Indenture
Trustee, during the fiscal year ending June 15, 2005; of trust money collected
by the Indenture Trustee pursuant to Section 5.02 of the Indenture, pursuant to
which the trust's notes (the "Notes") were issued; and

         2. Based upon my review and examination, to the best of my knowledge,
during such fiscal year, the trust money collected by the Indenture Trustee was
properly applied, pursuant to Section 5.02 of the Indenture.

         Nothing herein shall constitute a representation as to the proper
application by the registered holder of the Notes or the trust of the trust
monies received by it.



JPMORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A., as Indenture Trustee
Worldwide Securities Services
4 New York Plaza, 15th Floor
New York, NY 10004


/s/ Albert P. Mari, Jr.


Name:  Albert P. Mari, Jr.
Title: Vice President


<TABLE>
<S><C>
JPMORGAN CHASE BANK o Institutional Trust Services o 4 New York Plaza, Floor 15, New York, NY 10004
</TABLE>
#### William Cochrane, Respondent, v. Hannah W. Cornwell, Impleaded with Jesse C. Kraack and Virgil Keesler, Appellants.

Order reversed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and motion denied, without costs, upon the ground that upon the perfection of the appeal for a new trial the judgment of the Justice’s Court ceases to be of any force, and the respondent’s only remedy is to secure a judgment upon the new trial or a dismissal of the appeal, and to rely upon the undertaking given upon the appeal. *(Miller*v. *City of*Buffalo, 129 App. Div. 833; *Burns*v. *Howard,*9 Abb. N. C. 321, 324.) All concurred.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY HIGH

 267

 270

 273

 271

 257

 243

 246

 232

 224

 230

 275

 260

 248

 237

 223

 214

 218

 232

 231

 231

 233

 241

 249

 253

 254

 251

 254

 250

 248

 257

 245

 257

 249

 257

 251

 237

 220

 207

 175

 176

 183

 179

 201

 213

 205

 187

 185

 186

 192

 197

 203

 209

 217

 223

 227

 234

 238

 238

 237

 240

 237

 235

 260

 258

 264

 260

 247

 233

 226

 205

 197

 198

 210

 223

 225

 218

 202

 197

 200

 208

 213

 218

 221

 227

 232

 236

 240

 242

 243

 243

 243

 243

 240

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

MARCH 2014 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: June 6, 2014

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

RIO VISTA ON THE SACRAMENTO RIVER
### §§1131 to 1133. Omitted

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section 1131, Pub. L. 92–255, title II, §221, as added Pub. L. 94–237, §4(b), Mar. 19, 1976, 90 Stat. 243, which related to functions of Director concerning planning and policies, was omitted in the general revision of title II of Pub. L. 92–255 by Pub. L. 96–181, §4, Jan. 2, 1980, 93 Stat. 1309. See section 1111 of this title.

A prior section 1131, Pub. L. 92–255, title II, §221, Mar. 21, 1972, 86 Stat. 70, which provided for establishment of overall planning and policy and the criteria to achieve objectives and priorities for all Federal drug abuse prevention functions, was repealed by Pub. L. 92–255, title I, §104, Mar. 21, 1972, 86 Stat. 67, eff. June 30, 1975.

Section 1132, Pub. L. 92–255, title II, §222, as added Pub. L. 94–237, §4(b), Mar. 19, 1976, 90 Stat. 243, which authorized President to designate Director to represent United States in negotiations concerning drug abuse functions, was omitted in the general revision of title II of Pub. L. 92–255 by Pub. L. 96–181, §4, Jan. 2, 1980, 93 Stat. 1309. See section 1112 of this title.

A prior section 1132, Pub. L. 92–255, title II, §222, Mar. 21, 1972, 86 Stat. 71, which provided for review and modification of implementation plans and budget requests, was repealed by Pub. L. 92–255, title I, §104, Mar. 21, 1972, 86 Stat. 67, eff. June 30, 1975.

Section 1133, Pub. L. 92–255, title II, §223, as added Pub. L. 94–237, §4(b), Mar. 19, 1976, 90 Stat. 244, which related to an annual report to President and Congress on activities of Office of Drug Abuse Policy, was omitted in the general revision of title II of Pub. L. 92–255 by Pub. L. 96–181, §4, Jan. 2, 1980, 93 Stat. 1309. See section 1117 of this title.

A prior section 1133, Pub. L. 92–255, title II, §223, Mar. 21, 1972, 86 Stat. 71, which provided for establishment and the objectives of a Special Fund, was repealed by Pub. L. 92–255, title I, §104, Mar. 21, 1972, 86 Stat. 67, eff. June 30, 1975.