alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Bridget M. McCormack

,

Chief Justice

Brian K. Zahra

David F. Viviano

Richard H. Bernstein

Elizabeth T. Clement

Megan K. Cavanagh

Elizabeth M. Welch

,

Justices

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

April 2 8 , 2021 

# Order

Clerk April 2 8 , 2021

162746 ( 50 )

UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN REGENTS,

Plaintiff

- Appellee,

SC: 162746

v COA: 349942

Washtenaw CC: 16

- 001122

- CK

VICTOR P. VALENTINO,

Defendant

- Appellant

.

_______ ______________________________ ___ /

On order of the Chief Justice, the motion of plaintiff

- appellee to extend the time for

filing its answer to the application for leave to appeal i s GRANTED. The answer will be

accepted as timely filed if submitted on or before May 2 6 , 2021

.
#### In the Matter of Joseph Cetrone, Petitioner. John H. Delaney et al., Constituting the Board of Transportation of the City of New York, Respondents.

No opinion. Present — Martin, P. J., Townley, Dore, Cohn and Callahan, JJ.
A-AA+Skip to content

                  - Home
                  - Compendium Statistics
                  - Event
                  - Archives
                  - Glossary
                  - Help
                  - Contact
                  - Research on Disability

Annual Disability Statistics Compendium

              - Home /
              - Compendium Statistics /
              - Health /
              - 8.4 Health Behavior - Obesity among Persons Aged 18 and Over, by Disability Status

## Table 8.4: Health Behavior—Percent (%) Obesity among Persons Ages 18 and Over, by Disability Status: 2012

----

----

 

----

#### 2012 Disability Compendium

                        - Home
                        - Compendium Statistics                           - Population and Prevelance
                          - Employment
                          - Time Trend Population Statistics
                          - Poverty
                          - Earnings
                          - Veterans
                          - Health Insurance Coverage
                          - Health
                          - Social Security Administration Programs
                          - Medicaid and Medicare
                          - Special Education
                          - Vocational Rehabilitation
                          - Federal Government Spending and Employment
                          - International Disability Statistics
                          - Population Statistics: Disability Type
                        - Event
                        - Archives                           - 2012 Compendium Statistics
                        - Glossary
                        - Help
                        - Contact
                        - Research on Disability

#### Funding for this project is made possible by:

 The Research and Training Center on Disability Statistics and Demographics (StatsRRTC), which is funded by the U.S. Department of Education, National Institute for Disability and Rehabilitation Research, under cooperative agreements H133B080012.

#### Stay Connected

**Institute on Disability**10 West Edge Drive, Suite 101Durham, NH 03824603.862.4320 | relay: 711 | [email protected]www.iod.unh.edu

© 2013. Institute on Disability.University of New Hampshire.
5. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the auditcommittee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):     a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design oroperation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonablylikely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process,summarize and report financial information; and     b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or otheremployees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting.Date:November 12, 2008         /s/  Michael K. Farrell
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

DAY HIGH

 17,897

 18,552

 18,188

 17,401

 18,840

 18,888

 18,027

 15,347

 14,955

 14,436

 15,455

 15,900

 17,412

 17,173

 17,873

 19,111

 21,316

 21,111

 17,933

 16,774

 15,696

 15,537

 16,196

 15,920

 16,890

 15,557

 16,955

 17,457

 18,033

 18,000

 5,584

 9,359

 9,710

 9,521

 8,361

 8,774

 9,236

 8,552

 7,236

 7,310

 7,098

 7,944

 8,564

 8,170

 8,603

 8,228

 9,021

 10,507

 9,182

 8,080

 7,385

 7,172

 7,819

 8,082

 8,937

 7,855

 6,690

 8,281

 8,436

 8,369

 13,507

 13,909

 13,633

 13,137

 13,331

 14,213

 13,783

 12,479

 11,654

 11,374

 11,566

 11,930

 12,465

 12,512

 12,556

 13,153

 15,362

 15,336

 13,527

 12,624

 12,132

 12,092

 12,080

 12,003

 12,282

 10,950

 11,198

 12,536

 13,200

 13,115

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

NOVEMBER 2020 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: December 8, 2020

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

PITTSBURG BOTTOM ON THE SACRAMENTO RIVER
No. 89-1214.

#### Orthokinetics, Inc., et al. *v.*Penox Technologies, Inc., et al.

C. A. 3d Cir. Certiorari denied.
###### Editorial Note on Part 70

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 70 appear by T.D. ATF-450, 66 FR 29022-29030, May 29, 2001.

#### § 70.169 Expense of levy and sale.

The appropriate TTB officer shall determine the expenses to be allowed in all cases of levy and sale. Such expenses shall include the expenses of protection and preservation of the property during the period subsequent to the levy, as well as the actual expenses incurred in connection with the sale thereof. In case real and personal property (or several tracts of real property) are sold in the aggregate, the appropriate TTB officer shall properly apportion the expenses to the real property (or to each tract).

(26 U.S.C. 6341)
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion

should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited

circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 07-50546

Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

Plaintiff-Appellee

v.

ALBERTO DE LA RIVA-DE LA TORRE

Defendant-Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Western District of Texas

USDC No. 3:06-CR-2262-ALL

Before JOLLY, HIGGINBOTHAM, and PRADO, Circuit Judges. 

PER CURIAM:*

Appealing the Judgment in a Criminal Case, Alberto De La Riva-De La

Torre raises arguments that are foreclosed by Almendarez-Torres v. United

States, 523 U.S. 224, 235 (1998), which held that 8 U.S.C. § 1326(b)(2) is a

penalty provision and not a separate criminal offense. United States v.

Pineda-Arrellano, 492 F.3d 624, 625 (5th Cir. 2007), petition for cert. filed (Aug.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

F I L E D

December 5, 2007

Charles R. Fulbruge III

Clerk
No. 07-50546

2

28, 2007) (No. 07-6202). The Government’s motion for summary affirmance is

GRANTED, and the judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.
#### Ramon Montemayor CANTU, Petitioner, v. Alberto R. GONZALES, Attorney General, Respondent.

No. 04-74193.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted Feb. 13, 2006.*

Decided Feb. 21, 2006.

*211Ramon Montemayor Cantu, Los Angeles, CA, pro se.

CAC-Distriet Counsel, Esq., Office of the District Counsel, Department of Homeland Security, Los Angeles, CA, Ronald E. LeFevre, Chief Counsel, Office of the District Counsel, Department of Homeland Security, San Francisco, CA, David V. Bernal, Andrew C. MacLachlan, Esq., U.S. Department of Justice, Civil Div./Offiee of Immigration Lit., Washington, DC, for Respondent.

Before: FERNANDEZ, RYMER, and BYBEE, Circuit Judges.

*

 The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. *See*Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

MEMORANDUM **

Ramon Montemayor Cantu, a native and citizen of Mexico, petitions pro se for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BLA”) decision affirming an immigration judge’s order denying his application for cancellation of removal on the ground that Cantu had been convicted of a crime involving moral turpitude. We have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We review de novo constitutional challenges and questions of law, *Notash v. Gonzales,*427 F.3d 693, 696 (9th Cir.2005), and we deny the petition for review.

The BIA correctly determined that Cantu’s conviction for grand theft constitutes a crime involving moral turpitude, *see Rashtabadi v. INS,*23 F.3d 1562, 1568 (9th Cir.1994) (indicating that a theft conviction under Cal.Penal Code § 487.1 qualifies as a crime of moral turpitude), and that Cantu could not utilize the petty offense exception because he was convicted of a felony, *see Garcia-Lopez v. Ashcroft,*334 F.3d 840, 843 (9th Cir.2003) (indicating that a California state criminal conviction is classified as a felony when the sentence imposed exceeds one year).

All remaining contentions are unpersuasive.

PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED

**

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by 9 th Cir. R. 36-3.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY HIGH

 172

 160

 154

 157

 163

 159

 159

 151

 153

 149

 146

 144

 160

 156

 139

 141

 167

 158

 185

 157

 160

 144

 166

 173

 175

 178

 172

 187

 523

 508

 515

 140

 138

 132

 129

 132

 126

 130

 129

 134

 131

 129

 124

 130

 125

 126

 130

 131

 132

 135

 138

 138

 136

 137

 163

 161

 154

 158

 157

 159

 166

 171

 159

 149

 143

 140

 143

 143

 140

 140

 143

 143

 139

 135

 137

 132

 132

 134

 141

 138

 145

 145

 144

 140

 142

 167

 168

 164

 162

 164

 208

 243

 240

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

MAY 2003 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: June 11, 2003

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

PITTSBURG BOTTOM ON THE SACRAMENTO RIVER
#### Isaac L. Wolf, Respondent, v. Henri P. Wertheim and Others, Appellants.

Judgment and order affirmed, with costs. No opinion. Present — Ingraham, P. J., McLaughlin, Clarke, Dowling and Hotchkiss, JJ.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 04-4902

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

versus

CURTIS DAVIS, JR., a/k/a Billy Dee,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of

South Carolina, at Orangeburg. Patrick Michael Duffy, District

Judge. (CR-03-391)

Submitted: January 26, 2007 Decided: February 20, 2007

Before WILLIAMS and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior

Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

William N. Nettles, Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellant.

Jonathan S. Gasser, United States Attorney, Carlton R. Bourne, Jr.,

Assistant United States Attorney, Charleston, South Carolina, for

Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
*

We offer no criticism of the district judge, who followed the

law and procedure in effect at the time Davis was sentenced.

- 2 -

PER CURIAM:

Curtis Davis, Jr., was found guilty by a jury of

conspiracy to possess with intent to distribute and distributing

five kilograms or more of cocaine and fifty grams or more of

cocaine base (Count 1) and money laundering under 18 U.S.C.

§ 1956(a)(1) (2000) (Count 11). Adopting the recommendations in

the presentence report, the district court sentenced Davis to a

life sentence for Count 1 and a 240-month concurrent sentence for

Count 11. At the sentencing hearing, the district court stated

that, even if the Federal Sentencing Guidelines were to be found

“nonbinding,” it would give Davis an identical alternative

sentence. (J.A. 59). The court referenced the 18 U.S.C.A.

§ 3553(a) (West 2000 & Supp. 2006) factors in its criminal

judgment. On appeal, Davis alleges he was sentenced in violation

of Blakely v. Washington, 542 U.S. 296 (2004), and United States v.

Booker, 543 U.S. 220 (2005). For the reasons that follow, we

affirm.

Davis alleges that he was sentenced based on facts not

found by the jury or admitted by him in violation of Blakely and

Booker. Because Davis timely objected on this basis in the district

court, we review his claim for harmless error.* United States v.

Rodriguez, 433 F.3d 411, 415-16 (4th Cir. 2006); United States v.
- 3 -

Mackins, 315 F.3d 399, 405 (4th Cir. 2003). We find no harmless

error, however, as the district court stated it would have given

Davis an identical sentence even if the Sentencing Guidelines were

found to be advisory. United States v. Shatley, 448 F.3d 264,

267-68 (4th Cir.), cert. denied, 127 S. Ct. 310 (2006) (holding that

in light of district court’s finding that it would impose an

identical alternative sentence, any Sixth Amendment Booker error was

harmless). 

Accordingly, we affirm Davis’ sentence. We dispense with

oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately

presented in the materials before the court and argument would not

aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
§ 402.195 How a request is denied. ( a ) *Oral requests.* If we cannot comply with your oral request because the Deputy Executive Director for the Office of Public Disclosure, Office of the General Counsel (or designee) has not previously made a determination to release the record you want, we will tell you that fact. If you still wish to pursue your request, you must put your request in writing.
( b ) *Written requests.* If you make a written request and the information or record you requested will not be released, we will send you an official denial in writing. We will explain why the request was denied (for example, the reasons why the requested document is subject to one or more clearly described exemptions), will include the name and title or position of the person who made the decision, and what your appeal rights are.
( c ) *Unproductive searches.* We make a diligent search for records to satisfy your request. Nevertheless, we may not be able always to find the records you want using the information you provided, or they may not exist. If we advise you that we have been unable to find the records despite a diligent search, this does not constitute a denial of your request.
[62 FR 4154, Jan. 29, 1997, as amended at 68 FR 60295, Oct. 22, 2003]
I 

114TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 3963 

To amend title 10, United States Code, to extend military commissary and 

exchange store privileges to certain veterans who have been awarded 

the Purple Heart and to their dependents. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

NOVEMBER 5, 2015 

Mr. DOLD introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee 

on Armed Services 

A BILL 

To amend title 10, United States Code, to extend military 

commissary and exchange store privileges to certain veterans who have been awarded the Purple Heart and 

to their dependents. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Purple Heart Heroes 

5 Act of 2015’’. 


smartinez on DSK4TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 3963 IH

1 SEC. 2. COMMISSARY AND EXCHANGE STORE PRIVILEGES 

2 FOR CERTAIN VETERANS WHO HAVE BEEN 

3 AWARDED THE PURPLE HEART AND THEIR 

4 DEPENDENTS. 

5 (a) EXTENSION OF PRIVILEGES.—Chapter 54 of title 

6 10, United States Code, is amended by adding at the end 

7 the following new section: 

8 ‘‘§ 1065. Use of commissary and MWR retail facilities: 

9 certain veterans who have been awarded 

10 the Purple Heart and their dependents 

11 ‘‘(a) CERTAIN PURPLE HEART RECIPIENTS.—A vet12 eran who has a disability that is compensable under the 

13 laws administered by the Secretary of Veterans Affairs 

14 and that is attributable to an injury for which the veteran 

15 was awarded the Purple Heart shall be permitted to use 

16 commissary stores and MWR retail facilities on the same 

17 basis as a member of the armed forces entitled to retired 

18 or retainer pay. 

19 ‘‘(b) DEPENDENTS.—A dependent of a veteran de20 scribed in subsection (a) shall be permitted to use com21 missary and MWR retail facilities on the same basis as 

22 a dependent of a member of the armed forces entitled to 

23 retired or retainer pay. 

24 ‘‘(c) DEFINITIONS.—In this section: 


smartinez on DSK4TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
3 

•HR 3963 IH

1 ‘‘(1) The term ‘MWR retail facilities’ has the 

2 meaning given that term in section 1063(e) of this 

3 title. 

4 ‘‘(2) The term ‘veteran’ has the meaning given 

5 that term in section 101 of title 38.’’. 

6 (b) CLERICAL AMENDMENT.—The table of sections 

7 at the beginning of chapter 54 of title 10, United States 

8 Code, is amended by adding at the end the following new 

9 item: 

‘‘1065. Use of commissary and MWR retail facilities: certain veterans who have 

been awarded the Purple Heart and their dependents.’’. 

10 (c) EFFECTIVE DATE.—Section 1065 of title 10, 

11 United States Code, as added by subsection (a), shall take 

12 effect at the end of the 90-day period beginning on the 

13 date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


smartinez on DSK4TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
EX-4.1



 Exhibit 4.1 
  

			
	COMMON STOCK		COMMON STOCK

 LANTHEUS HOLDINGS, INC. 
  

			
			 CUSIP

SEE REVERSE FOR CERTAIN DEFINITIONS


 THIS CERTIFIES THAT
                                        
 
 Is the record holder of
                                        
     
 FULLY PAID AND NON-assessable shares of common stock, $0.01 PAR VALUE PER SHARE, OF 

LANTHEUS HOLDINGS, INC. 

Transferable on the books of the Corporation by the person or by duly authorized attorney upon surrender of this Certificate properly
endorsed. This Certificate is not valid until countersigned by the Transfer Agent and registered by the Registrar. Witness the facsimile seal of the Corporation and the facsimile signatures of its duly authorized officers. 

Dated: 
  

					
					 COUNTERSIGNED AND REGISTERED:
  

	  
 President
				
			[SEAL]		TRANSFER AGENT AND REGISTRAR.
					 By:
  

	  
 Secretary
				  
 AUTHORIZED
SIGNATURE









 LANTHEUS HOLDINGS, INC. 

The following abbreviations, when used in the inscription on the face of this Certificate, shall be construed as though they were written out
in full according to applicable laws or regulations: 
  

															
	TEN COM		—		as tenants in common		UNIF GIFT MIN ACT —		  
		Custodian		  

	TEN ENT		—		as tenants by the entireties						(Cust)				(Minor)
	JT TEN		—		as joint tenants with right of survivorship and not as tenants in common						 under Uniform Gifts to Minors Act

 
  

(State)

						
							UNIF TRF MIN ACT —				Custodian (until age
											                                		        )        		                                
											(Cust)				(Minor)
											under Uniform Gifts to Minors Act
						
											  

(State)


 Additional abbreviations may also be used though not in the above list. 

  
 2 








 For Value Received,
                                         
                                         
                                         
              hereby sell(s), assign(s) and transfer(s) unto 
 PLEASE INSERT SOCIAL

 SECURITY OR OTHER 
 IDENTIFYING 

NUMBER OF ASSIGNEE 
  

 
  

 
  

 
 (PLEASE PRINT OR TYPEWRITE NAME AND
ADDRESS, INCLUDING ZIP CODE, OF ASSIGNEE) 
  
  

 
  
  

 
 Of the
        Stock represented by the within Certificate, and do(es) hereby irrevocably constitute and appoint 
  

 
 Attorney to transfer the said stock on the books of
the within named Corporation with full power of substitution in the premises. 
 Date
                     
  

			
			  

Signature

		
	NOTICE:		  
 THE SIGNATURE(S) TO THIS
ASSIGNMENT MUST CORRESPOND WITH THE NAME(S) AS WRITTEN UPON THE FACE OF THE CERTIFICATE IN EVERY PARTICULAR WITHOUT ALTERATION OR ENLARGEMENT OR ANY CHANGE WHATSOEVER.



  

	
	Signature(s) Guaranteed:
	
	  
 SIGNATURE(S) MUST BE GUARANTEED BY
AN ELIGIBLE GUARANTOR INSTITUTION (BANKS, STOCKBROKERS, SAVINGS AND LOAN ASSOCIATIONS AND CREDIT UNIONS WITH MEMBERSHIP IN AN APPROVED SIGNATURE GUARANTEE MEDALLION PROGRAM), PURSUANT TO S.E.C. RULE 17Ad-15.

	


  
 3
Electrical Conductivity, UMHOS

Day High Low Mean

1 4,210 232 1,218

2 6,077 292 2,272

3 9,085 346 3,057

4 7,114 461 3,061

5 8,046 481 3,889

6 4,169 381 1,780

7 3,307 348 1,372

8 3,035 48 1,134

9 2,241 336 1,055

10 4,363 355 1,648

11 3,810 350 1,519

12 7,049 342 2,241

13 9,811 356 2,975

14 8,282 390 2,834

15 6,334 358 2,227

16 7,139 453 3,102

17 10,644 689 4,450

18 11,479 959 5,389

19 10,259 1,116 5,099

20 10,318 1,065 4,959

21 0 0 0

22 8,121 1,274 4,561

23 6,846 1,125 4,057

24 9,117 1,434 4,251

25 8,860 892 3,515

26 8,684 804 3,803

27 8,743 586 3,663

28 7,558 515 3,272

COMMENT(S):

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

Historical Archive and Report Database

Port Chicago Bottom In Suisun Bay

Period: February 2023 Run Date: 11/27/2023
**NAVTECH,
INC.** **and
SUBSIDIARIES**
 **EXHIBIT
23**
 
 ****
 **CONSENT
OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED CHARTERED ACCOUNTANTS**
   We
consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration Statements No.
333-32648, 333-32656 and 333-58756 of Navtech Inc. on Form S-8 of our report
dated January 25, 2006, appearing in this Annual Report on Form 10-KSB of
Navtech Inc. for the year ended October 31, 2005.
  /s/
Deloitte & Touche LLP
 Kitchener,
Ontario
 January
25, 2006
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1996
<CASH>                                           1,338
<SECURITIES>                                        44
<RECEIVABLES>                                    4,008
<ALLOWANCES>                                       162
<INVENTORY>                                        416
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 6,048
<PP&E>                                          49,232
<DEPRECIATION>                                  27,625
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  32,068
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            6,247
<BONDS>                                          7,878
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         1,009
<OTHER-SE>                                      12,049
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    32,068
<SALES>                                            322
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                13,990
<CGS>                                              563
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    7,243
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 3,175
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   180
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 531
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  3,567
<INCOME-TAX>                                     1,337
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              2,230
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     2,230
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     2.24
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     2.24
        

</TABLE>