alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 23.2  Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm  The
Board of Directors Centennial
Bank Holdings, Inc.:  We
consent to the incorporation by reference in the registration statements on Form S-8
(No. 333-127456 and No. 333-134950) of Centennial Bank Holdings, Inc.
of our report dated March 23, 2007, with respect to the consolidated
balance sheet of Centennial Bank Holdings, Inc. and subsidiaries as of December 31,
2006, and the related consolidated statements of income (loss), changes in
stockholders equity and comprehensive income (loss), and cash flows for each
of the years in the two-year period ended December 31, 2006,which report
appears in the December 31, 2007 annual report on Form 10-K of
Centennial Bank Holdings, Inc.  /s/
  KPMG LLPDenver,
  ColoradoFebruary 29,
  2008
I 

114TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 3789 

To amend title 38, United States Code, to direct the Secretary of Veterans 

Affairs to furnish a memorial headstone or marker to commemorate 

an eligible individual whose remains are identified and available but 

the location of the gravesite is unknown. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

OCTOBER 21, 2015 

Mr. GUINTA introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Veterans’ Affairs 

A BILL 

To amend title 38, United States Code, to direct the Secretary of Veterans Affairs to furnish a memorial headstone or marker to commemorate an eligible individual 

whose remains are identified and available but the location of the gravesite is unknown. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Honor Our Fallen He5 roes Act of 2015’’. 


SSpencer on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 3789 IH

1 SEC. 2. DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS HEADSTONES 

2 AND MARKERS FOR INDIVIDUALS WHOSE RE3 MAINS ARE IDENTIFIED AND AVAILABLE BUT 

4 THE LOCATION OF THE GRAVESITE IS UN5 KNOWN. 

6 (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 2306(b)(1) of title 38, 

7 United States Code, is amended by inserting before the 

8 period at the end of the first sentence the following: ‘‘or 

9 an eligible individual whose remains are identified and 

10 available but the location of the gravesite is unknown’’. 

11 (b) APPLICABILITY.—The amendment made by sub12 section (a) shall apply with respect to deaths occurring 

13 before, on, or after the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


SSpencer on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO  18 U.S.C. §1350,  AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the amended Annual Report of Kodiak Oil & Gas Corp. (the "Company") on Form 10-K/A for the
period ended December 31, 2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, James P. Henderson, Secretary, Treasurer and Chief Financial Officer,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



Date: August 6, 2010/s/ JAMES P. HENDERSON James P. Henderson Secretary, Treasurer and Chief Financial Officer


---



QuickLinks
#### § 10.414 What reports of dependents are needed in death cases?

If a beneficiary is receiving compensation benefits on account of an employee's death, OWCP will ask him or her to complete a report once each year on Form CA-12. The report requires the beneficiary to note changes in marital status and dependents. If the beneficiary fails to submit the form (or an equivalent written statement) within 30 days of the date of request, OWCP shall suspend compensation until the requested form or equivalent written statement is received. The suspension will include compensation payable for or on behalf of another person (for example, compensation payable to a widow on behalf of a child). When the form or statement is received, compensation will be reinstated at the appropriate rate retroactive to the date of suspension, provided the beneficiary is entitled to such compensation.
### §807. Definitions; authorization of appropriations for administrative and other expenses

(a) As used in this chapter the term "State" means any State of the United States, the District of Columbia, the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico, Guam, American Samoa, the Trust Territory of the Pacific Islands, and the Virgin Islands; and the term "Secretary" means the Secretary of Housing and Urban Development.

(b) There are authorized to be appropriated such sums as may be necessary for administrative and other expenses in carrying out this chapter.

(Pub. L. 88–560, title VIII, §808, formerly §807, as added Pub. L. 91–152, title III, §307, Dec. 24, 1969, 83 Stat. 394; renumbered §808, Pub. L. 93–383, title IV, §402(c)(1), Aug. 22, 1974, 88 Stat. 692.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

This chapter formerly consisted of subchapters I and II prior to its general reorganization by Pub. L. 91–152, title III, §307, Dec. 24, 1969, 83 Stat. 394. Former subchapter II, consisting of section 811, Pub. L. 88–560, VIII, §810, Sept. 2, 1964, 78 Stat. 803; Pub. L. 90–19, §21(d), (f), May 25, 1967, 81 Stat. 26; Pub. L. 90–66, Aug. 19, 1967, 81 Stat. 167, was omitted in the general reorganization of this chapter by Pub. L. 91–152. For subject matter of former section 811, see section 802 of this title.

#### **Executive Documents**

#### Termination of Trust Territory of the Pacific Islands

For termination of Trust Territory of the Pacific Islands, see note set out preceding section 1681 of Title 48, Territories and Insular Possessions.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

DAY HIGH

 3,659

 4,110

 4,755

 5,868

 6,057

 5,476

 5,746

 6,500

 6,001

 4,883

 4,940

 3,587

 2,778

 3,466

 3,878

 4,878

 5,617

 5,654

 8,619

 9,664

 10,078

 9,505

 8,863

 9,079

 12,230

 10,554

 8,987

 7,462

 9,064

 8,192

 917

 958

 859

 752

 883

 662

 643

 709

 649

 649

 673

 672

 542

 558

 539

 663

 963

 915

 1,113

 1,189

 1,096

 916

 1,455

 1,493

 2,083

 2,066

 2,218

 1,819

 2,314

 2,761

 1,922

 1,814

 1,839

 2,094

 2,172

 2,122

 2,253

 2,403

 2,289

 2,110

 1,897

 1,714

 1,605

 1,516

 1,623

 1,864

 2,366

 2,847

 3,823

 4,261

 4,270

 4,021

 4,326

 5,274

 6,266

 5,359

 4,869

 4,321

 4,701

 4,977

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

JUNE 2009 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: July 29, 2009

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

PITTSBURG TOP ON THE SACRAMENTO RIVER
§ 345.102 Multiple employer limitation. ( a ) The contributions required by this part shall not apply to any amount of the aggregate compensation paid to such employee by all such employers in such calendar month which is in excess of the MCB; and
( b ) Each employer (other than a subordinate unit of a national-railway-labor-organization employer) shall be liable for that portion of the contribution with respect to such compensation paid by all such employers which the compensation paid by the employer to such employee bears to the total compensation paid in such month by all such employers to such employee.
( c ) In the event that the compensation paid by such employers to the employee in such month is less than the MCB, each subordinate unit of a national-railway-labor-organization employer shall be liable for such portion of any additional contribution as the compensation paid by such employer to such employee in such month bears to the total compensation paid by all national-railway-labor-organization employers to such employee in such month.
[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 11 (Tuesday, January 18, 2011)]
[Notices]
[Page 2914]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2011-880]



[[Page 2914]]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


National Eye Institute; Notice of Closed Meeting

    Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended (5 U.S.C. App), notice is hereby given of the following 
meeting.
    The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the 
provisions set forth in section 552b(c)(6), Title 5 U.S.C., as amended, 
for the review, discussion, and evaluation of individual intramural 
programs and projects conducted by the National Eye Institute, 
including consideration of personnel qualifications and performances, 
and the competence of individual investigators, the disclosure of which 
would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

    Name of Committee: Board of Scientific Counselors, National Eye 
Institute.
    Date: February 27-March 1, 2011.
    Time: 7 a.m. to 5 p.m.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate personal qualifications and 
performance, and competence of individual investigators.
    Place: National Institutes of Health, Building 31, 31 Center 
Drive, Bethesda, MD 20892.
    Contact Person: Sheldon S. Miller, PhD, Scientific Director, 
National Institutes of Health, National Eye Institute, Bethesda, MD 
20892, (301) 451-6763.
    In the interest of security, NIH has instituted stringent 
procedures for entrance onto the NIH campus. All visitor vehicles, 
including taxicabs, hotel, and airport shuttles will be inspected 
before being allowed on campus. Visitors will be asked to show one 
form of identification (for example, a government-issued photo ID, 
driver's license, or passport) and to state the purpose of their 
visit.
    Information is also available on the Institute's/Center's home 
page: http://www.nei.nih.gov, where an agenda and any additional 
information will be posted when available.

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.867, 
Vision Research, National Institutes of Health, HHS)

    Dated: January 11, 2011.
Jennifer S. Spaeth,
Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. 2011-880 Filed 1-14-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-P
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

DAY HIGH

 4,732

 5,645

 6,779

 7,029

 8,094

 7,929

 7,360

 7,178

 8,577

 8,785

 10,392

 11,109

 12,793

 10,509

 10,141

 9,628

 9,382

 9,189

 9,624

 11,227

 10,368

 9,201

 13,188

 13,172

 12,363

 10,883

 9,836

 9,117

 7,292

 5,751

 1,409

 1,032

 1,205

 1,938

 2,030

 2,234

 1,871

 1,777

 1,712

 1,755

 2,060

 2,939

 2,889

 3,196

 3,114

 2,685

 2,466

 2,594

 2,674

 3,580

 2,085

 3,008

 3,567

 3,118

 2,160

 1,798

 1,497

 1,597

 1,545

 1,236

 2,815

 2,945

 3,675

 4,213

 4,320

 4,423

 3,890

 3,907

 3,997

 4,569

 5,811

 6,237

 6,905

 6,420

 6,136

 5,861

 5,881

 5,665

 5,581

 6,251

 5,376

 5,348

 6,387

 7,225

 6,139

 4,956

 4,509

 4,308

 3,731

 2,789

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

NOVEMBER 2011 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: February 2, 2012

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

PITTSBURG TOP ON THE SACRAMENTO RIVER
### SUBCHAPTER II—INTERCHANGE OF PERSONS, KNOWLEDGE, AND SKILLS BETWEEN UNITED STATES AND FOREIGN COUNTRIES
```

[Congressional Bills 114th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 3831 Received in Senate (RDS)]

<DOC>
114th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 3831

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                           December 14, 2015

                                Received

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
 To amend title XVIII of the Social Security Act to extend the annual 
       comment period for payment rates under Medicare Advantage.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Securing Fairness in Regulatory 
Timing Act of 2015''.

SEC. 2. EXTENDING THE ANNUAL COMMENT PERIOD FOR PAYMENT RATES UNDER 
              MEDICARE ADVANTAGE.

    Section 1853(b)(2) of the Social Security Act (42 U.S.C. 1395w-
23(b)(2)) is amended--
            (1) by inserting ``(or, in 2017 and each subsequent year, 
        at least 60 days)'' after ``45 days''; and
            (2) by inserting ``(in 2017 and each subsequent year, of no 
        less than 30 days)'' after ``opportunity''.

            Passed the House of Representatives December 10, 2015.

            Attest:

                                                 KAREN L. HAAS,

                                                                 Clerk.
```
<PAGE>

                           CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                            18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                 SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

     In connection with the Annual Report of The Sportsman's Guide, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2003 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission (the "Report"), I, Gregory R. Binkley, Chief
Executive Officer, and I, Charles B. Lingen, Chief Financial Officer of the
Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. sec.1350, as adopted pursuant to sec.906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

        (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
     15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

        (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
     material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
     Company.

Dated: March 19, 2004

                                                /s/ GREGORY R. BINKLEY
                                          --------------------------------------
                                          Gregory R. Binkley, President
                                          (Chief Executive Officer)

                                                 /s/ CHARLES B. LINGEN
                                          --------------------------------------
                                          Charles B. Lingen, Executive Vice
                                          President of
                                          Finance and Administration/Chief
                                          Financial Officer
                                          (Principal Financial and Accounting
                                          Officer)

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to The Sportsman's Guide, Inc. and will be retained by The Sportsman's
Guide, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff
upon request.
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Ronald Edward STEWART, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 04-11494.

Conference Calendar.

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.

Decided Feb. 23, 2006.

Nancy E. Larson, Assistant U.S. Attorney, Christopher R. Wolfe, U.S. Attorney’s Office, Northern District of Texas, Fort Worth, TX, for Plaintiff-Appellee.

Peter Michael Fleury, Assistant Federal Public Defender, Federal Public Defender’s Office, Northern District of Texas, Fort Worth, TX, for Defendant-Appellant.

Before GARZA, DENNIS, and PRADO, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: *

Ronald Edward Stewart appeals from his guilty-plea conviction for two counts of bank robbery. He argues that the district court committed plain error by *623sentencing him as a career offender, pursuant to U.S.S.G. § 4Bl.l(b)(C), based upon his two prior Texas state convictions for burglary of a habitation. As Stewart concedes, this issue is reviewed only for plain error because he did not object on this basis in district court. *See United States v. Gracia-Cantu,*302 F.3d 308, 310 (5th Cir.2002); *see also United States v. Villegas,*404 F.3d 355, 363 (5th Cir.2005). The district court did not commit plain error on this basis. *See United States v. Hornsby,*88 F.3d 336, 339 (5th Cir.1996).

Stewart also contends that, because his sentence was increased based upon the finding that he was a career offender, his Sixth Amendment rights were violated and he should be resentenced under the mandatory federal Sentencing Guidelines without reliance upon the career-offender finding. As he concedes, his argument is foreclosed by *Almendarez-Torres v. United States,*523 U.S. 224, 118 S.Ct. 1219, 140 L.Ed.2d 350 (1998), and by *United States v. Scroggins,*411 F.3d 572 (5th Cir.2005).

Accordingly, the judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.

*

 Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be *623published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.
Exhibit 99.1
 
 NEWS RELEASE
 For further information, contact:
    
    Matt Quantz, Manager  Corporate Communications
(337) 232-7028, www.petroquest.com
 PETROQUEST ENERGY ANNOUNCES A DISCOVERY AT ITS LA CANTERA PROSPECT, UPDATES OPERATING ACTIVITIES
AND HEDGING
   Well Number
    
    NRI
    
    Initial Sales Date
    
    Lateral Length (ft.)
    
    24 Hour Gross Rate (Mcf/d)PQ 47
    
    30%
    
    5/17/2011
    
    5,255
    
    5,340PQ 48
    
    27%
    
    4/21/2011
    
    4,691
    
    3,151PQ 49
    
    20%
    
    5/23/2011
    
    5,506
    
    3,382PQ 50
    
    53%
    
    5/12/2011
    
    5,115
    
    6,208PQ 51
    
    20%
    
    5/31/2011
    
    5,558
    
    2,609PQ 52
    
    17%
    
    6/23/2011
    
    5,285
    
    8,935




---



##### 



Hedging Update
 InstrumentProduction Period
    
    Type
    
    
    Daily Volumes
    
    
    PriceGas:2012
    
    Costless Collar
    
    10,000 Mmbtu
    
    $
    5.00 - $5.29
 Management Statement
  About the Company
 Forward-Looking Statements  This news release contains forward-looking statements within the meaning of Section 27A of the
Securities Act of 1933, as amended, and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as
amended. These forward-looking statements are subject to certain risks, trends and uncertainties
that could cause actual results to differ materially from those projected. Among those risks,
trends and uncertainties are




---



##### 



our ability to find oil and natural gas reserves that are economically recoverable, the volatility
of oil and natural gas prices and significantly depressed natural gas prices since the middle of
2008, the uncertain economic conditions in the United States and globally, the declines in the
values of our properties that have resulted in and may in the future result in additional ceiling
test write-downs, our ability to replace reserves and sustain production, our estimate of the
sufficiency of our existing capital sources, our ability to raise additional capital to fund cash
requirements for future operations, the uncertainties involved in prospect development and property
acquisitions or dispositions and in projecting future rates of production or future reserves, the
timing of development expenditures and drilling of wells, hurricanes and other natural disasters,
changes in laws and regulations as they relate to our operations, including our fracing operations
in shale plays or our operations in the Gulf of Mexico, and the operating hazards attendant to the
oil and gas business. In particular, careful consideration should be given to cautionary
statements made in the various reports PetroQuest has filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission. PetroQuest undertakes no duty to update or revise these forward-looking statements.
 http://www.petroquest.com/news.html?=BizID=1690&1=1
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

GABIER HESMI MONGE; CANDELARIA

LOPEZ MORALES,

Petitioners,

v.

WILLIAM P. BARR, Attorney General,

Respondent. No. 18

- 73471

Agency Nos. A206

- 270

- 449

A206

- 270

- 443

MEMORANDUM *

On Petition for Review of an Order of the

Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted December 11, 2019 **

Before: WALLACE, CANBY, and TASHIMA, Circuit Judges.

Gabier Hesmi Monge and Candelaria Lopez Morales , native s and citizen s of

Mexico, petition for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order

dismissing their appeal from an immigration judge’s (“IJ”) decision denying their

application for asylum, withholding of removal, and relief under the Convention

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent

except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36

- 3.

** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). 

# FILED

DEC 18 2019

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS2 18

- 73471

Against Torture (“CAT”). Our jurisdiction is governed by 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We

review for substantial evidence the agency’s factual findings. Ga rcia

- Milian v.

Holder , 755 F.3d 1026, 1031 (9th Cir. 2014). We deny in part and dismiss in part

the petition for review.

Petitioners do not meaningfully challenge the agency’s determination that

they failed to establish that the harm t he y suffered or fea r in Mexico was or would

be on account of a protected ground. See Rizk v. Holder , 629 F.3d 1083, 1091 n.3

(9th Cir. 2011) (a petitioner waives an issue by failing to raise it in the opening

brief)

. Thus, petitioners’ asylum and withholding of removal claims fail.

Substantial evidence supports the agency’s denial of petitioners ’ CAT claim

because t he y failed to show it is more likely than not t he y will be tortured by or

with the consent or acquiescence of the government if returned to Mexico. See

Garcia

- Milian , 755 F.3d at 1033

- 35 (concluding that petitioner did not establish

the necessary state action for CAT relief).

We lack jurisdiction to con sider petitioners’ contention s regarding IJ error or

persecution based on political opinion because t he y did not exhaust them before

the BIA

. See Barron v. Ashcroft , 358 F.3d 674, 677

- 78 (9th Cir. 2004) (court lacks

jurisdiction to review claims not pres ented to the agency)

.

PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED in part; DISMISSED in part

.