alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### Fanny L. Whiting, Respondent, v. Gordon Whiting, Appellant.

Interlocutory judgment unanimously affirmed, with costs.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

DAY HIGH

 11,410

 12,146

 11,931

 11,385

 13,740

 16,653

 18,098

 16,797

 14,241

 15,387

 15,847

 16,876

 16,395

 15,257

 14,255

 14,224

 15,347

 15,606

 17,697

 18,905

 18,716

 18,203

 18,605

 15,819

 14,889

 14,198

 13,916

 13,240

 2,458

 2,736

 3,088

 3,057

 3,045

 3,553

 4,716

 3,265

 3,109

 3,168

 3,407

 4,104

 4,829

 4,954

 5,338

 5,623

 6,528

 6,391

 6,423

 5,540

 5,142

 4,790

 3,350

 2,249

 2,277

 2,340

 2,343

 2,730

 6,835

 7,080

 6,639

 5,767

 5,958

 8,993

 10,512

 9,720

 8,767

 8,759

 9,134

 10,017

 10,282

 9,925

 9,919

 9,839

 10,063

 9,483

 9,620

 10,488

 10,801

 10,913

 10,742

 8,806

 7,956

 7,514

 7,632

 8,030

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

FEBRUARY 2002 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: March 11, 2002

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

PORT CHICAGO TOP IN SUISUN BAY
#### Fred Thomas DORSSART, Jr. v. Olin G. BLACKWELL, Warden.

Civ. A. No. 11277.

United States District Court N. D. Georgia, Atlanta Division.

Oct. 31, 1967.

Fred Thomas Dossart, Jr., pro se.

Charles L. Goodson, U. S. Atty., Theodore E. Smith, Asst. U. S. Atty., Atlanta, Ga., for respondent.

ORDER

EDENFIELD, District Judge.

Petitioner is presently confined in the United States penitentiary in Atlanta, Georgia, where he is serving a one-year sentence imposed by the District Court for the Eastern District of Louisiana. He has alleged that his confinement in a penitentiary, when his sentence is for no more than one year, is in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 4083 and is therefore illegal.

> Section 4083 reads as follows:

> “Persons convicted of offenses against the United States or by courts-martial punishable by imprisonment for more than one year may be confined in any United States penitentiary.

> “A sentence for an offense punishable by imprisonment for one year or less shall not be served in a penitentiary without the consent of the defendant.”

Petitioner further alleges he has not consented to serve his sentence in a penitentiary.

Section 4083 was amended in 1959. Under the law as it had previously stood, the length of a particular sentence determined whether a prisoner could be incarcerated in a penitentiary. See Copeland v. Archer, 50 F.2d 836 (9th Cir. 1931). As the court reads Section 4083 as amended, however, whether a prisoner is to be confined in a penitentiary or not depends not on the length of the sentence which he actually received, but on the length of the sentence he *could*have received under the applicable law. There *400appear to be no cases specifically interpreting Section 4083. Comments in two cases since 1959 implying that the pre1959 meaning was still applicable were in the nature of obiter dicta. Yates v. United States, 316 F.2d 718 (10th Cir. 1963); United States ex rel. Ormento v. Warden, 216 F.Supp. 609 (D.C.Kan. 1963). Further supporting the court’s conclusion as to the meaning of Section 4083, which concededly does lend itself to some confusion on its face, is the legislative history of the 1959 amendment. This clearly indicates that the purpose of the amendment was to allow persons who had received a sentence of only one year or less to be sent to a penitentiary if they % could have received a sentence in excess'of one year. U.S.C. C.A.N. 2315-17 (1959).

Petitioner’s present confinement in the penitentiary not being in violation of any law, the petition for a writ of habeas corpus is therefore denied.
§ 222.24 Relationship as remarried widow(er). ( a ) *New eligibility.* A claimant will have the relationship of a remarried widow(er) if he or she is the widow(er), as discussed in § 222.11, of an employee and the claimant— ( 1 ) Remarried after attaining age 60, or remarried after attaining age 50 and after the date on which he or she became disabled; or
( 2 ) Remarried before attaining age 60, but is now unmarried, or remarried before attaining age 50 or before the date on which he or she became disabled, but is now unmarried.
( b ) *Reentitlement.* A claimant will have the relationship of a remarried widow(er) if he or she remarries after his or her entitlement to an annuity as a widow(er) has been established, and the claimant— ( 1 ) Remarries after attaining age 60, or remarries after attaining age 50 and after the date on which he or she became disabled; or
( 2 ) Is entitled to an annuity based upon having a child of the employee in care and remarries, but this marriage is to a person who is entitled to a retirement, disability, widow(er)'s, mother's, father's, parent's, or disabled child's benefit under the Railroad Retirement Act or Social Security Act.
#### § 10.626 Who has jurisdiction of cases on appeal to the ECAB?

While a case is on appeal to the ECAB, OWCP has no jurisdiction over the claim with respect to issues which directly relate to the issue or issues on appeal. The OWCP continues to administer the claim and retains jurisdiction over issues unrelated to the issue or issues on appeal and issues which arise after the appeal as a result of ongoing administration of the case. Such issues would include, for example, the ability to terminate benefits where an individual returns to work while an appeal is pending at the ECAB. ECAB's rules of procedure are found at part 501 of this title.
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
 Washington, DC 20549
 FORM 6-K
 REPORT OF FOREIGN PRIVATE ISSUER
PURSUANT TO RULE 13a-16 OR 15d-16 OF
THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
 From: July 14, 2011
 IVANHOE MINES LTD.
   Suite 654  999 CANADA PLACE, VANCOUVER, BRITISH COLUMBIA V6C 3E1
   o þ
  o þ




---



##### 



Ivanhoe Mine Logo (small) July 14, 2011 Ivanhoe Mines announces
appointment of Rio Tinto executive Dan Larsen to company’s board of
directors TORONTO, CANADA — David Huberman,
Chairman of Ivanhoe Mines, announced today that Dan Larsen, Rio Tinto’s
Controller and Global Head of Planning and Reporting, has been appointed to the
Ivanhoe Mines Board of Directors. Rio Tinto’s nomination of
Mr. Larsen increases to seven the number of Rio Tinto appointees presently
on the 14-member Ivanhoe Mines board. Under terms of the October 2006
private placement agreement between Rio Tinto and Ivanhoe Mines, Rio Tinto is
entitled to nominate members to the Ivanhoe board in proportion to Rio
Tinto’s shareholding in Ivanhoe. Rio Tinto has committed to maintain a
majority of independent directors on the Ivanhoe Mines board until
January 2014. Rio Tinto increased its holding in
Ivanhoe Mines to 46.5% from 42.0% in late June 2011 through Rio
Tinto’s exercise of all remaining share-purchase warrants – which
also resulted in the allocation of an additional Ivanhoe Mines directorship to
Rio Tinto. Mr. Larsen has been based in
London, England, as Rio Tinto Group Controller and Global Head of Planning and
Reporting for the past six years. He is a director of Rio Tinto International
Holdings Ltd., which holds Rio Tinto’s interest in Ivanhoe Mines.
Mr. Larsen joined Rio Tinto in 1992 and previously was a senior manager
with Ernst & Young’s mining practice. Howard Balloch, a director of Ivanhoe
Mines since 2005, has relinquished his position to enable
Mr. Larsen’s nomination. Mr. Huberman said
Mr. Balloch’s experience as Canada’s former ambassador to
China and Mongolia, and his career in Canada’s foreign service, had
greatly benefited the Ivanhoe Mines Board of Directors as the company pursued
the development of its Oyu Tolgoi copper-gold-silver mining complex in Mongolia
and other developments in the Asia Pacific region. Mr. Balloch is Chairman
of Canaccord Genuity Asia. About Ivanhoe Mines Ivanhoe Mines (NYSE, NASDAQ & TSX:
IVN) is an international mining company with operations focused in the Asia
Pacific region. Assets include the company’s 66% interest in the Oyu
Tolgoi copper-gold-silver mine development project in southern Mongolia; its
57% interest in Mongolian coal miner SouthGobi Resources (TSX: SGQ; HK: 1878);
a 62% interest in Ivanhoe Australia (TSX & ASX: IVA), a
copper-gold-uranium-molybdenum-rhenium exploration and development company; and
a 50% interest in Altynalmas Gold Ltd., a private company developing the Kyzyl
Gold Project in Kazakhstan. Information contacts
Investors: Bill Trenaman +1.604.688.5755. Media: Bob Williamson
+1.604.331.9830




---



##### 



SIGNATURES
  IVANHOE MINES LTD.Date:July 14, 2011
    By:
    /s/ Beverly A. BartlettBEVERLY A. BARTLETTVice President &
Corporate Secretary
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY HIGH

 7,662

 7,944

 8,767

 9,285

 9,610

 9,847

 9,075

 8,214

 7,587

 6,291

 6,243

 6,039

 6,543

 7,578

 8,423

 8,675

 8,689

 8,858

 8,524

 9,363

 8,352

 6,051

 6,332

 5,811

 5,076

 4,613

 4,942

 5,793

 5,165

 5,339

 5,298

 1,672

 1,484

 1,454

 1,508

 1,506

 1,654

 1,567

 1,567

 1,496

 1,363

 1,381

 1,572

 1,526

 1,714

 1,553

 1,405

 1,224

 1,309

 1,381

 1,607

 1,476

 1,395

 1,374

 1,390

 1,205

 1,071

 982

 981

 930

 869

 753

 3,653

 3,496

 3,976

 4,274

 4,514

 4,614

 4,319

 3,986

 3,748

 3,412

 3,336

 3,126

 3,014

 3,166

 3,189

 3,464

 3,535

 3,671

 3,828

 4,131

 3,814

 3,227

 3,165

 2,951

 2,480

 2,084

 1,922

 1,958

 2,384

 2,088

 1,908

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

AUGUST 2017 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: September 28, 2017

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

PITTSBURG BOTTOM ON THE SACRAMENTO RIVER
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

DAY HIGH

 579

 527

 567

 583

 592

 606

 617

 640

 660

 682

 697

 683

 689

 681

 676

 676

 651

 657

 645

 650

 653

 667

 627

 648

 628

 624

 618

 614

 613

 577

 427

 421

 501

 509

 526

 557

 546

 544

 552

 615

 614

 616

 609

 612

 611

 593

 586

 599

 575

 567

 559

 574

 538

 554

 546

 536

 529

 511

 512

 514

 480

 489

 530

 551

 561

 584

 596

 595

 619

 659

 669

 659

 659

 661

 656

 643

 626

 619

 597

 601

 589

 594

 587

 584

 571

 566

 552

 546

 545

 541

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

SEPTEMBER 2020 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: October 19, 2020

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

DELTA MENDOTA CANAL AT CHECK 13 (O'NEILL)
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

DAY ELEV

 1,900.97

 1,901.23

 1,901.31

 1,901.20

 1,901.05

 1,901.16

 1,901.25

 1,901.33

 1,901.28

 1,901.19

 1,901.29

 1,901.34

 1,901.20

 1,901.28

 1,901.18

 1,901.18

 1,901.27

 1,901.33

 1,901.28

 1,901.45

 1,901.52

 1,901.56

 1,901.62

 1,901.38

 1,901.34

 1,901.34

 1,901.40

 1,901.40

 13,889

 14,083

 14,143

 14,061

 13,948

 14,031

 14,098

 14,158

 14,120

 14,053

 14,128

 14,165

 14,061

 14,120

 14,046

 14,046

 14,113

 14,158

 14,120

 14,248

 14,300

 14,330

 14,375

 14,195

 14,165

 14,165

 14,210

 14,210

STORAGE

-134

+194

+60

-82

-113

+83

+67

+60

-38

-67

+75

+37

-104

+59

-74

+0

+67

+45

-38

+128

+52

+30

+45

-180

-30

+0

+45

+0

CHANGE

542

536

468

404

384

487

461

485

412

413

475

474

401

482

407

326

352

341

409

503

541

517

577

433

518

535

560

531

INFLOW

 100

 100

 100

 100

 100

 100

 100

 100

 100

 100

 100

 60

 0

 60

 100

 100

 100

 100

 100

 100

 100

 100

 100

 100

 100

 100

 100

 100

POWER

 122

 120

 115

 113

 113

 113

 114

 115

 114

 115

 115

 122

 128

 122

 117

 111

 102

 102

 103

 102

 105

 106

 105

 104

 102

 103

 102

 103

SPILL

 89

 89

 89

 89

 89

 89

 89

 89

 89

 89

 89

 129

 189

 129

 89

 89

 89

 89

 89

 89

 89

 89

 89

 89

 89

 89

 89

 89

OUTLETS

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 7

 0

 2

 2

 2

 2

 2

 0

 0

 0

 0

 10

 2

 2

 2

 0

 0

 0

 0

 9

 1

C.F.S.

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .34

 .00

 .10

 .08

 .07

 .07

 .07

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .44

 .10

 .09

 .09

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .42

 .05

INCHES

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

FEBRUARY 2022 LEWISTON LAKE DAILY OPERATIONS RUN DATE: March 1, 2022

IN LAKE

EVAPORATION

C.F.S. FRANCIS CARR

COMPUTED*

ACRE-FEET

RELEASE - C.F.S. 

TOTALS +187 12,974 2,620 2,672 3,108 43 1.92

ACRE-FEET +187 25,734 5,197 5,300 6,165 85

* COMPUTED INFLOW IS THE SUM OF CHANGE IN STORAGE, RELEASES AND EVAPORATION.

(1) OUTLET RELEASE INCLUDES FISH RELEASE.

(2) INCHES OF EVAPORATION TAKEN FROM PAN AT TRINITY RIVER HATCHERY.

SUMMARY

RELEASE (ACRE-FEET)

TOTAL POWER 5,197

TOTAL RIVER 16,662 25,457

 14,023

 8,795

RIVER

JUDGE FRANCIS CARR POWERPLANT

TOTAL RELEASE

JUDGE (2)

(1) POWERPLANT

 299

 129

 134

 143

 139

 143

 124

 144

 128

 141

 131

 142

 134

 139

 138

 26

 27

 27

 126

 145

 219

 205

 260

 231

 242

 243

 237

 238

 4,434

 8,795
#### Karl Loevenich, Appellant, v. Ivan Podgoursky, Respondent.

No opinion. Present — Martin, P. J., Townie)7, Dore, Cohn and Callahan, JJ.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                             5
<LEGEND>
This schedule  contains summary  financial  information  extracted from NATIONAL
PROPERTY  INVESTORS 7 2000 Third Quarter 10-QSB and is qualified in its entirety
by reference to such 10-QSB filing.
</LEGEND>
<CIK>                                 0000732439
<NAME>                                NATIONAL PROPERTY INVESTORS 7
<MULTIPLIER>                                              1,000

<S>                                     <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                         9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                     DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                        JUL-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                          SEP-30-2000
<CASH>                                                      627
<SECURITIES>                                                  0
<RECEIVABLES>                                               472
<ALLOWANCES>                                                  0
<INVENTORY>                                                   0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                              0 <F1>
<PP&E>                                                   47,837
<DEPRECIATION>                                          (29,066)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                           20,674
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                         0 <F1>
<BONDS>                                                  20,965
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                         0
<PREFERRED>                                                   0
<COMMON>                                                      0
<OTHER-SE>                                               (1,032)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                             20,674
<SALES>                                                       0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                          5,560
<CGS>                                                         0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                                 0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                          5,550
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                              0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                        1,242
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                               0
<INCOME-TAX>                                                  0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                           0
<DISCONTINUED>                                                0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                               0
<CHANGES>                                                     0
<NET-INCOME>                                                 10
<EPS-BASIC>                                                0.17 <F2>
<EPS-DILUTED>                                                 0
<FN>
<F1> Registrant has an unclassified balance sheet. <F2> Multiplier is 1.
</FN>


</TABLE>
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

DAY ELEV

 222.85

 222.87

 223.36

 223.33

 222.36

 221.44

 221.62

 222.16

 222.09

 222.39

 221.89

 222.19

 221.91

 222.13

 221.79

 222.18

 222.48

 221.84

 221.44

 222.05

 222.07

 221.73

 221.65

 222.98

 223.33

 221.91

 220.38

 219.90

 220.32

 221.85

 50,646

 50,699

 52,009

 51,928

 49,341

 46,915

 47,388

 48,810

 48,624

 49,421

 48,098

 48,889

 48,150

 48,730

 47,835

 48,863

 49,660

 47,966

 46,915

 48,517

 48,571

 47,677

 47,467

 50,993

 51,928

 48,150

 44,140

 42,893

 43,983

 47,992

STORAGE

+267

+53

+1,310

-81

-2,587

-2,426

+473

+1,422

-186

+797

-1,323

+791

-739

+580

-895

+1,028

+797

-1,694

-1,051

+1,602

+54

-894

-210

+3,526

+935

-3,778

-4,010

-1,247

+1,090

+4,009

CHANGE

1,891

1,946

1,911

1,633

1,660

1,196

1,603

1,795

1,837

1,824

1,626

1,369

1,267

1,403

1,674

1,893

1,709

1,347

1,058

916

940

1,148

1,352

1,356

1,246

999

479

31

73

1,121

PUMPING

 4,820

 4,250

 4,596

 4,811

 5,061

 4,928

 4,997

 5,178

 4,698

 4,261

 4,554

 4,315

 4,401

 4,474

 5,134

 4,809

 4,243

 4,493

 4,551

 4,836

 4,907

 5,057

 4,662

 4,046

 3,243

 4,969

 5,081

 5,024

 5,020

 4,703

PUMPING

 3,950

 4,738

 3,642

 3,146

 3,639

 3,248

 2,448

 2,352

 3,133

 2,938

 3,917

 2,546

 3,820

 2,742

 3,470

 3,510

 3,315

 4,511

 3,315

 2,139

 2,056

 2,335

 2,524

 1,263

 2,914

 3,028

 2,353

 966

 1,063

 1,353

PUMPING

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 357

 246

 184

 0

GEN.

*

+76

+12

+302

+150

-206

+22

+3

+289

-16

+45

-93

-113

+241

+74

+36

+75

+70

+102

-50

+258

+80

+16

+13

+230

+16

-187

-153

-634

+95

+516

OR

UNITED STATES 

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION

CONSOLIDATED STATE-FEDERAL O'NEILL FOREBAY October 18, 2018

DAILY OPERATIONS

SEPTEMBER 2018 RUN DATE:

IN LAKE GEN.

ACRE-FEET O'NEILL

RELEASE - C.F.S. 

TOTALS -2,387 40,303 787 86,374 140,122 +1,269

ACRE-FEET -2,387 79,941 1,561 171,323 277,932

SUMMARY

 360

RELEASE (ACRE-FEET)

O'NEILL GEN. 1,561

SAN LUIS PUMP 171,323 360

 50,379

DOS AMIGOS PUMP 277,932

DELIVERIES 

S. LUIS O'NEILL

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 875

 0

 0

 875

 1,736

CALIF. DOS AMIGOS

AQUEDUCT

6,938

7,057

6,685

6,133

5,941

5,734

6,078

6,162

5,917

5,732

6,271

6,003

6,341

6,032

6,443

6,870

6,180

6,701

6,328

6,609

5,971

5,778

5,715

5,500

5,367

5,281

5,443

5,336

6,650

6,622

 183,818

 364,603

S. LUIS

DELIV.

GAINS(+)

LOSS(-)

C.F.S.

INFLOW - C.F.S.

STATE OF CALIFORNIA

THE RESOURCES AGENCY

DEPARTMENT OF WATER RESOURCES

STATE WATER PROJECT

TOTAL 451,176

 2,517

* DAILY DEL. FIGURES UNAVAILABLE. TOT. DEL. IS INCLUDED IN COMPUTING MONTHLY TOTALS 

Table 18
Order filed September 20, 2012

In The 

## Fourteenth Court of Appeals

____________ NO. 14

- 09

- 01065

- CV

____________ L. MICKELE' DANIELS AND WIFE, RHONDA L. DANIELS , Appellant s
V.
THE COMMONWEALTH CIV IC ASSOCIATION, INC. , Appellee

On Appeal from the 240th District Court Fort Bend County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 08

- DCV

- 165996



### ORDER
Appellant
, Leiroi Mickele’ Daniels , petitioned for voluntary bankruptcy in the United States Bankruptcy Court for the Southern District of Texas, under cause number 0

- 40413

- LZP7 . Because a stay is automatically effected by Section 362(a) of the Bankruptcy Code, when this court received notice of appellant = s bankruptcy filing, on November 23, 201 0 , we stayed all proceedings in the appeal. See Tex. R. App. P. 8.2.

On August 23 , 2012, appellee informed this court the bankruptcy case was closed. Attached to the motion is a copy of the bankruptcy court = s order closing the case on February 17, 2012.Accordingly, the case is ordered REINSTATED and placed on the court = s active

docket.
Appellants ’ brief is due to be filed with the clerk of this court within thirty days of the date of this order

PER CURIAM
### §826a. Attorney General report on drug shortages

Not later than 6 months after July 9, 2012, and annually thereafter, the Attorney General shall submit to the Committee on Energy and Commerce of the House of Representatives and the Committee on the Judiciary of the Senate a report on drug shortages that—

(1) identifies the number of requests received under section 826(h) of this title (as added by section 1005 of this Act), the average review time for such requests, the number of requests granted and denied under such section, and, for each of the requests denied under such section, the basis for such denial;

(2) describes the coordination between the Drug Enforcement Administration and Food and Drug Administration on efforts to prevent or alleviate drug shortages; and

(3) identifies drugs containing a controlled substance subject to section 826 of this title when such a drug is determined by the Secretary to be in shortage.

(Pub. L. 112–144, title X, §1006, July 9, 2012, 126 Stat. 1105.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

Section 1005 of this Act, referred to in par. (1), means section 1005 of Pub. L. 112–144, which amended section 826 of this title.

#### Codification

Section was enacted as part of the Food and Drug Administration Safety and Innovation Act, and not as part of the Controlled Substances Act which comprises this subchapter.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Definition of "Secretary"

The term "Secretary" as meaning the Secretary of Health and Human Services, see section 1001(b) of Pub. L. 112–144, set out as an Effect of Notification note under section 356c of this title.
Exhibit 23.2
 Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
##### 



Exhibit 10.2
 SOLICITORS




---



##### 



SOLICITORS
 27 October 2005
BETWEEN
 1.
    
    EUROPEAN ELECTRONIC TEST CENTREhaving its registered office at
P.O. Box 27 1, Grand Cayman Islands, British West Indies (the Vendorwhich
expression shall where the context so admits or requires include its successors in
title) of the one part and2.
    
    DORVILLE HOMES LMMTEDhaving its registered office at 24-26 City
Quay, Dublin 2 (the Purchaserwhich expression
shall where the context
admits or requires include its successors in title) the other part.
 RECITALS:
 
 th 
 
 the 1960 Assignment




---



##### 



SOLICITORS
    
  ALL THIS AND THOSE TO HOLD
 AND THE PURCHASER HEREBY COVENANTS




---



##### 



IT IS HEREBY CERTIFIED
 IT IS HEREBY FURTHER CERTIFIED
 IN WITNESS
 FIRST SCHEDULE
  SECOND SCHEDULE
  PRESENTwhen the Common Seal ofEURAPEAN ELECTRONICS TESTCENTREwas affixed hereto:
    
    :/s/ Yong Siew WaiDirector:/s/ Martin KellyDirectorWitness::/s/ Paul MurphyTS Brookwood AvenueArtaneDublins