alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 404.1214 Agreement for coverage. ( a ) *General.* A State may enter into a written agreement with the Commissioner to provide for Social Security coverage for its employees or the employees of one or more of its political subdivisions. An interstate instrumentality may enter into a similar agreement for its employees. These agreements cover employees in groups of positions or by types of services rather than the individual employees.
( b ) *Procedures.* A State or interstate instrumentality may request coverage by submitting to SSA a proposed written agreement for the desired coverage.
( c ) *Authority to enter into an agreement for coverage* — ( 1 ) *Federal law.* Section 218(a) of the Act requires the Commissioner to enter into an agreement, at the request of the State, to extend Social Security coverage to the State's employees or those of its political subdivisions. Section 218(g) authorizes the Commissioner to enter into an agreement, at the request of an interstate instrumentality, to extend Social Security coverage to the employees of the interstate instrumentality.
( 2 ) *State law.* State law must authorize a State or an interstate instrumentality to enter into an agreement with the Commissioner for Social Security coverage.
( d ) *Provisions of the agreement.* The agreement must include: ( 1 ) A description of the specific services to be covered and excluded;
( 2 ) The State's promise to pay, to the Secretary of the Treasury, contributions equal to the sum of the taxes which would be required under the Federal Insurance Contributions Act from employers and employees if the employment were in the private sector;
( 3 ) The State's promise to comply with the regulations the Commissioner prescribes for carrying out the provisions of section 218 of the Act; and
( 4 ) Identification of the political subdivisions, coverage groups, or services being covered and the services that are excluded. The agreement must be signed by the authorized State or interstate instrumentality official and the Commissioner or his or her designee.
( e ) *Effective date.* The agreement must specify an effective date of coverage. However, the effective date cannot be earlier than the last day of the sixth calendar year preceding the year in which the agreement is mailed or delivered by other means to the Commissioner. The agreement is effective after the effective date.
( f ) *Applicability of agreement.* The agreement establishes the continuing relationship between the Commissioner and the State or interstate instrumentality except as it is modified (see §§ 404.1215-404.1217).
(Approved by the Office of Management and Budget under control number 0960-0425) [53 FR 32976, Aug. 29, 1988, as amended at 62 FR 38451, July 18, 1997; 66 FR 28836, May 25, 2001]
Order entered November 10, 2015

In The

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-15-00184-CR

VICTOR RENARD BROWN, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the 194th Judicial District Court

Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. F14-76504-M

ORDER

The Court DENIES appellant’s pro se motion for extension of time to file brief. The 

Court notified appellant by letter dated August 10, 2015 that the deadline for filing a pro se 

response to the Anders brief filed in this case was October 8, 2015. This case is set for 

submission on November 24, 2015.

We ORDER the Clerk of the Court to send a copy of this order to Victor Renard Brown, 

TDCJ No. 01977507, Bradshaw Unit, P.O. Box 9000, Henderson, Texas, 75653.

/s/ ROBERT M. FILLMORE 

PRESIDING JUSTICE
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 11-2288

LATORY SHANON MIDDLETON,

 Plaintiff – Appellant,

v.

JOHN EMERSON; KASSI B. SANDIFER,

 Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of 

South Carolina, at Charleston. David C. Norton, District Judge. 

(2:11-cv-02535-DCN)

Submitted: March 15, 2012 Decided: March 19, 2012

Before DUNCAN and FLOYD, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior 

Circuit Judge.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Latory Shanon Middleton, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Latory Shanon Middleton filed a document in the 

district court that she captioned “Notice of Removal,” but that

otherwise appeared to be a complaint alleging employment 

discrimination in violation of federal law. The document named

two individuals as defendants. The magistrate judge, noting 

that Middleton was a plaintiff in a pending state proceeding,

correctly pointed out that under the applicable federal 

statutes, a plaintiff may not remove a proceeding to federal 

court. 28 U.S.C. §§ 1441(a), 1446(a) (2006). The magistrate 

judge then observed that, construing Middleton’s filing as a 

complaint of employment discrimination under federal law, the 

filing failed to demonstrate exhaustion of administrative 

remedies or to name Middleton’s employer as defendant. The 

magistrate judge therefore recommended dismissing the complaint 

without prejudice.

 Middleton, informed of the need to file objections to 

the magistrate judge’s report, made a timely filing which, 

although fairly general, did provide some evidence that she may 

have exhausted administrative remedies. The district court, 

after a de novo review, adopted the report of the magistrate 

judge and dismissed the complaint without prejudice. Middleton 

seeks to appeal. 
3

Because the deficiencies in the complaint identified 

by the magistrate judge could be remedied by the filing of an 

amended complaint, we conclude that the district court’s order 

is neither a final order nor an appealable interlocutory or 

collateral order. See Domino Sugar Corp. v. Sugar Workers Local 

Union 392, 10 F.3d 1064, 1066-67 (4th Cir. 1993). Accordingly, 

we dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction. We dispense 

with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are 

adequately presented in the materials before the court and 

argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
Exhibit 99.1
 (SBS LETTERHEAD LOGO)
    
    For Immediate Release
 SPANISH BROADCASTING SYSTEM, INC.
ANNOUNCES A 1-FOR-10 REVERSE STOCK SPLIT
 Coconut
Grove, FL
     1




---



##### 



About Spanish Broadcasting System, Inc.
 www.spanishbroadcasting.com
 Contacts:
 Analysts and Investors
    
    Analysts, Investors or MediaJoseph A. García
    
    Chris PlunkettChief Financial Officer, Chief Administrative Officer,
    
    Brainerd Communicators, Inc.Senior Executive Vice President and Secretary
    
    (212) 986-6667(305) 441-6901
  2
§ 10.529 What action will OWCP take if the employee files an incomplete report? ( a ) If an employee knowingly omits or understates any earnings or work activity in making a report, he or she shall forfeit the right to compensation with respect to any period for which the report was required. A false or evasive statement, omission, concealment, or misrepresentation with respect to employment activity or earnings in a report may also subject an employee to criminal prosecution.
( b ) Where the right to compensation is forfeited, OWCP shall recover any compensation already paid for the period of forfeiture pursuant to 5 U.S.C. 8129 and other relevant statutes.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY HIGH

 11,880

 15,826

 15,758

 15,659

 16,402

 16,869

 14,765

 16,214

 15,215

 15,400

 15,509

 14,200

 13,000

 12,839

 13,824

 11,795

 13,583

 14,253

 15,266

 15,319

 17,771

 14,637

 13,830

 9,262

 6,565

 4,918

 3,755

 3,339

 3,021

 4,956

 7,474

 4,211

 5,075

 4,801

 4,771

 4,824

 4,769

 3,849

 4,014

 4,672

 5,626

 5,679

 5,497

 5,308

 3,956

 4,618

 4,633

 4,232

 5,004

 5,369

 6,297

 6,095

 5,082

 4,217

 3,062

 1,871

 1,245

 1,002

 821

 678

 626

 599

 7,556

 9,297

 9,030

 9,882

 9,917

 10,413

 9,508

 9,142

 9,524

 10,408

 10,408

 9,412

 9,133

 8,684

 8,837

 7,908

 7,359

 8,697

 9,476

 10,231

 11,373

 8,863

 8,863

 5,968

 3,633

 2,560

 1,756

 1,364

 1,208

 1,576

 2,093

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

JANUARY 2012 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: February 16, 2012

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

PITTSBURG BOTTOM ON THE SACRAMENTO RIVER
###### Editorial Note on Part 26

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 26 appear by T.D. ATF-451, 66 FR 21668, 21669, May 1, 2001.

#### § 26.203a Containers in excess of 1 gallon (3.785 liters).

Containers of distilled spirits brought into the United States from the Virgin Islands, having a capacity in excess of 1 gallon (3.785 liters), are required to be marked in accordance with customs regulations (19 CFR chapter I).

[T.D. 6695, 28 FR 12936, Dec. 5, 1963. Redesignated at 40 FR 16835, Apr. 15, 1975, and amended by T.D. ATF-34, 41 FR 46864, Oct. 26, 1976; T.D. ATF-206, 50 FR 23955, June 7, 1985]
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

DAY ELEV

 218.96

 219.45

 219.51

 218.83

 221.34

 219.17

 219.72

 220.36

 220.54

 220.52

 219.82

 221.27

 220.42

 221.71

 220.84

 220.78

 220.61

 218.83

 219.63

 220.74

 221.07

 219.31

 219.54

 220.39

 219.85

 222.15

 222.71

 222.12

 219.05

 219.08

 40,483

 41,733

 41,887

 40,153

 46,653

 41,017

 42,428

 44,088

 44,557

 44,505

 42,686

 46,469

 44,244

 47,625

 45,341

 45,184

 44,740

 40,153

 42,196

 45,080

 45,944

 41,375

 41,964

 44,166

 42,764

 48,783

 50,273

 48,703

 40,711

 40,788

STORAGE

-1,173

+1,250

+154

-1,734

+6,500

-5,636

+1,411

+1,660

+469

-52

-1,819

+3,783

-2,225

+3,381

-2,284

-157

-444

-4,587

+2,043

+2,884

+864

-4,569

+589

+2,202

-1,402

+6,019

+1,490

-1,570

-7,992

+77

CHANGE

1,918

1,807

2,410

2,648

3,098

3,151

2,672

2,150

2,095

2,090

2,122

2,193

2,280

1,556

474

594

537

569

1,222

1,465

312

2,785

2,907

3,060

3,063

3,158

3,172

3,175

2,384

2,202

PUMPING

 5,190

 5,973

 5,736

 6,936

 5,531

 7,733

 5,509

 7,782

 9,178

 8,233

 8,034

 6,944

 8,417

 8,278

 9,188

 8,147

 8,869

 9,679

 8,888

 8,431

 9,969

 10,051

 10,238

 10,452

 9,863

 8,544

 9,882

 10,776

 10,942

 11,147

PUMPING

 1,359

 1,122

 2,296

 0

 675

 4,337

 3,072

 0

 0

 915

 1,073

 457

 2,085

 810

 1,030

 1,966

 1,761

 1,440

 1,031

 768

 0

 1,085

 1,284

 1,888

 2,093

 1,723

 1,991

 2,830

 2,304

 0

PUMPING

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 449

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

GEN.

*

+415

-38

+288

-89

-133

+380

+635

-168

-272

-98

-18

-17

+43

-148

+225

-154

+147

+8

+176

+4

-408

-13

+402

-128

+151

-357

-52

+536

+220

+586

OR

UNITED STATES 

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION

CONSOLIDATED STATE-FEDERAL O'NEILL FOREBAY August 15, 2006

DAILY OPERATIONS

JUNE 2006 RUN DATE:

IN LAKE GEN.

ACRE-FEET O'NEILL

RELEASE - C.F.S. 

TOTALS -868 63,269 449 41,395 254,540 +2,123

ACRE-FEET -868 125,494 891 82,107 504,880

SUMMARY

 1,982

RELEASE (ACRE-FEET)

O'NEILL GEN. 891

SAN LUIS PUMP 82,107 1,982

 41,656

DOS AMIGOS PUMP 504,880

DELIVERIES 

S. LUIS O'NEILL

 2,047

 4,445

 863

 0

 3,918

 2,899

 4,091

 5,081

 4,846

 4,914

 3,734

 4,892

 4,730

 6,480

 4,727

 5,734

 4,882

 4,220

 6,554

 6,864

 7,992

 1,838

 3,502

 5,240

 2,659

 6,052

 4,853

 3,786

 4,626

 7,549

 134,018

 265,825

CALIF. DOS AMIGOS

AQUEDUCT

1,577

1,510

4,549

3,502

2,599

2,799

1,896

1,556

2,744

2,216

2,353

2,240

2,328

2,904

3,641

3,859

4,839

4,009

2,998

2,320

2,958

4,222

5,007

5,278

5,377

4,449

4,652

5,317

1,986

1,849

 97,534

 193,459

S. LUIS

DELIV.

GAINS(+)

LOSS(-)

C.F.S.

INFLOW - C.F.S.

STATE OF CALIFORNIA

THE RESOURCES AGENCY

DEPARTMENT OF WATER RESOURCES

STATE WATER PROJECT

TOTAL 589,860

 4,211

* DAILY DEL. FIGURES UNAVAILABLE. TOT. DEL. IS INCLUDED IN COMPUTING MONTHLY TOTALS 

Table 18
---



February 1, 2006

Professor Roman Onufrijchuk roman@sfu.ca Vancouver, BC

Dear Professor:

RE: TERMS OF APPOINTMENT AS NON-EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR

Fitmedia Inc. (the "Company") is pleased to confirm our
agreement that for the fiscal year beginning on February 1, 2006, you shall be
compensated with the following:

- US $1,000 cash
- 2,500 common shares of the Company (the "Compensation").

The Compensation shall be paid to you for your services for the
full year.

IndemnificationTo the fullest extent permitted by
the Company's charter documents and applicable law, the Company agrees to defend
and indemnify you and hold you harmless against any liability that you incur
within the scope of your service as a director of the Company.

You may indicate your agreement with these terms by signing and
dating this letter agreement.

Very truly yours,

FITMEDIA INC.

|/s/
      Timothy J. Crottey | 
|---------------------------- | 
|Timothy J. Crottey           | 
|Chairman of the Board        | 

I have read and accept and agree to the above terms of service:

|/s/
      Roman Onufrijchuk              | 
|---------------------------------------- | 
|Signature of Professor Roman Onufrijchuk | 
|Dated February 1, 2006                   | 

---
GRAPHIC

Ref. 3399

EXHIBIT 23.3

CONSENT OF SPROULE ASSOCIATES INC.

We
hereby consent to the references to our firm, in the context in which they appear, and to our reserve estimates as of January 1, 2006, included in the Annual Report on
Form 10-K of Kodiak Oil & Gas Corp. (the "Company") for the year ended December 31, 2008, as well as in the notes to the financial statements included therein.

We
also consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement on Form S-3 (No. 333-152311) and the Registration Statements on
Form S-8 (Nos. 333-138704 and 333-144878) of the references to our firm, in the context in which they appear, and to our reserve estimates as of
January 1, 2006, included in the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2008, as well as in the notes to the financial statements
included therein.

Sincerely,SPROULE U.S. LIMITED/s/ HARRY J. HELWERDA Harry J. Helwerda, P. Eng.
Executive Vice-President


March 11,
2009

Enclosure(s)
HJH:paob
w:\3399\consent\HJH 03-09-09.doc

GRAPHIC

---



QuickLinks
HPMSVtypeID yearID HPMSBaseYearVMT baseYearOffNetVMT 10 2024 410260 0 20 2024 42076835 0 30 2024 28989395 0 40 2024 306965 0 50 2024 2944820 0 60 2024 9934205 0
§ 9.43 Rocky Knob. ( a ) *Name.* The name of the viticultural area described in this section is “Rocky Knob.”
( b ) *Approved maps.* The appropriate maps for determining the boundaries of the Rocky Knob viticultural area are two 1968 U.S.G.S. maps. The maps are entitled: “Willis Quadrangle Virginia” 7.5 minute series and “Woolwine Quadrangle Virginia” 7.5 minute series.
( c ) *Boundaries.* The Rocky Knob viticultural area is located in Floyd and Patrick Counties in southern Virginia. The boundaries are as follows: ( 1 ) The beginning point is the intersection of Virginia State Route Nos. 776 and 799 at Connors Grove.
( 2 ) Then follow State Route No. 799 south and east to the Blue Ridge Parkway.
( 3 ) Then south on the parkway to its first intersection with State Route No. 758.
( 4 ) Then follow State Route No. 758 east to the intersection of State Route No. 726 at the southern boundary of the Rocky Knob Recreation Area.
( 5 ) Then follow the boundary of the Rocky Knob Recreation Area south then in a northeastern direction to where the boundary first intersects State Route No. 8.
( 6 ) Then from that point at State Route No. 8, proceed northeast in a straight line to State Route No. 719 and Widgeon Creek at a point about 0.7 of a mile west of the intersection of State Route Nos. 719 and 710.
( 7 ) Then proceed northwest in a straight line to the intersection with State Route No. 710 and the Blue Ridge Parkway.
( 8 ) Then follow the Parkway southwest to the intersection with State Route No. 726.
( 9 ) Then turn right on State Route No. 726 and proceed 0.6 of a mile to a roadway at the 3308 elevation point on the map.
( 10 ) Then from that point, proceed west in a straight line back to the starting point at Connors Grove.
[T.D. ATF-124, 48 FR 1293, Jan. 12, 1983, as amended by T.D. ATF-249, 52 FR 5957, Feb. 27, 1987; T.D. TTB-91, 76 FR 5477, Feb. 1, 2011]
§ 1001.124 Standards of performance governing State agency cooperation and coordination with other agencies and organizations. ( a ) Each State agency shall establish cooperative working relationships through written agreements with the Veterans Administration (VA) offices serving the State to maximize the use of VA employment and training programs for veterans and eligible persons.
( b ) All programs and activities governed by this subpart will be coordinated to the maximum extent feasible with other programs and activities under 38 U.S.C., the Wagner-Peyser Act, the Job Training Partnership Act, and other employment and training programs at the State and local level.
( c ) Such relationships or agreements may be described in the Governor's Coordination and Special Services Plan prepared according to section 121(b) of the Job Training Partnership Act (Pub. L. 97-300).
#### § 340.13 Compromise of amounts recoverable.

The Board or its designee may compromise an amount recoverable, provided such amount does not exceed $100,000, excluding interest, or such higher amount as the Attorney General may from time to time prescribe. Compromise of an amount recoverable may not be considered in any case in which there is an indication of fraud, the presentation of a false claim or misrepresentation on the part of the debtor or his representative. Compromise is at all times within the discretionary authority of the Board or its designee.

[Board Order 27-22, 32 FR 3341, Feb. 28, 1967, as amended at 62 FR 41271, Aug. 1, 1997]
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

EASTERN DISTRICT

JAMES D. SCHNELLER, FRIENDS OF 

JIM SCHNELLER FOR CONGRESS,

Petitioner

v.

PHILADELPHIA NEWSPAPERS, INC., 

IT'S OWNERS AND EMPLOYEES 

WILLIAM BENDER, DELAWARE 

COUNTY REPUBLICAN PARTY, PAT 

MEEHAN FOR CONGRESS PATRICIA A. 

WECHSLER, ERNEST S. ANGELOS, 

DONALD ADAMS, TERI ADAMS 

DELAWARE COUNTY PATRIOTS,

Respondents

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 174 EM 2016

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 22nd day of December, 2016, the Petition for Leave to File

Petition for Allowance of Appeal Nunc Pro Tunc is DENIED.
[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 75 (Tuesday, April 19, 2011)]
[Notices]
[Page 21932]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2011-9413]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

[Release No. 34-64226A; File No. SR-FINRA-2011-005]


 Self-Regulatory Organizations; Financial Industry Regulatory 
Authority, Inc.; Order Granting Approval of a Proposed Rule Change 
Relating to Promissory Note Proceedings; Correction

April 13, 2011.

Need for Correction

    In FR Document No. 2011-8897 beginning on page 20741 as published 
on Wednesday, April 13, 2011, the Commission issued Release No. 34-
64226, an order approving the proposed rule change by the Financial 
Industry Regulatory Authority, Inc. (``FINRA'') to amend Rule 13806 of 
the Code of Arbitration Procedure for Industry Disputes (``Industry 
Code''). Commission staff discovered that a statement in the 
introduction section of that order mischaracterized the nature of the 
rule change which was described accurately in the remainder of the 
order. The staff believes this mischaracterization was the result of an 
editing error.
    This correction does not substantively amend the Commission's 
approval order. The sole purpose of this correction is to rectify the 
error in the introduction section and alleviate any potential 
confusion. The introduction section of this approval order is being 
republished with the correction.

Correction of Publication

    Accordingly, the Introduction of the approval order is republished 
to correct a statement therein, as follows:

I. Introduction

    On February 4, 2011, the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority, 
Inc. (``FINRA'') filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission 
(``Commission''), pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the Securities 
Exchange Act of 1934 (``Act''),\1\ and Rule 19b-4 thereunder,\2\ a 
proposed rule change to amend Rule 13806 of the Code of Arbitration 
Procedure for Industry Disputes (``Industry Code'') to provide that 
FINRA will appoint a chair-qualified public arbitrator to a panel 
resolving a promissory note dispute instead of a chair-qualified public 
arbitrator also qualified to resolve a statutory discrimination claim. 
The proposed rule change was published for comment in the Federal 
Register on February 22, 2011.\3\ The Commission did not receive any 
comments on the proposal. This order approves the proposed change.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
    \2\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4.
    \3\ See Securities and Exchange Act Release No. 63909 (February 
15, 2011), 76 FR 9838 (February 22, 2011) (``Notice'').

    For the Commission, by the Division of Trading and Markets, 
pursuant to delegated authority.\4\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \4\ 17 CFR 200.30-3(a)(12).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Cathy H. Ahn,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2011-9413 Filed 4-18-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8011-01-P
### §2101. Findings

Congress finds that—

(1) the safety and integrity of the United States food supply are vital to public health, to public confidence in the food supply, and to the success of the food sector of the Nation's economy;

(2) illnesses and deaths of individuals and companion animals caused by contaminated food—

(A) have contributed to a loss of public confidence in food safety; and

(B) have caused significant economic losses to manufacturers and producers not responsible for contaminated food items;

(3) the task of preserving the safety of the food supply of the United States faces tremendous pressures with regard to—

(A) emerging pathogens and other contaminants and the ability to detect all forms of contamination;

(B) an increasing volume of imported food from a wide variety of countries; and

(C) a shortage of adequate resources for monitoring and inspection;

(4) according to the Economic Research Service of the Department of Agriculture, the United States is increasing the amount of food that it imports such that—

(A) from 2003 to 2007, the value of food imports has increased from $45,600,000,000 to $64,000,000,000; and

(B) imported food accounts for 13 percent of the average American diet including 31 percent of fruits, juices, and nuts, 9.5 percent of red meat, and 78.6 percent of fish and shellfish; and

(5) the number of full-time equivalent Food and Drug Administration employees conducting inspections has decreased from 2003 to 2007.

(Pub. L. 110–85, title X, §1001, Sept. 27, 2007, 121 Stat. 962.)