alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

DAY HIGH

 5,720

 6,473

 6,307

 6,105

 6,667

 8,168

 8,220

 9,095

 10,139

 9,222

 9,104

 7,931

 7,931

 7,129

 6,171

 4,621

 4,379

 5,299

 6,172

 5,661

 5,515

 5,658

 6,506

 5,730

 5,166

 5,436

 5,816

 4,380

 4,564

 5,139

 645

 748

 961

 1,240

 1,411

 1,645

 1,424

 1,577

 1,422

 1,359

 1,155

 1,020

 1,044

 1,292

 1,075

 961

 1,035

 1,004

 1,160

 939

 919

 852

 876

 740

 606

 584

 590

 656

 851

 677

 2,428

 2,740

 2,882

 2,960

 3,232

 3,657

 3,415

 3,942

 4,396

 3,930

 3,624

 3,577

 3,640

 3,916

 3,022

 2,186

 2,018

 2,244

 2,874

 2,409

 2,173

 2,160

 2,411

 2,144

 1,874

 1,926

 2,168

 2,265

 2,751

 2,291

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

APRIL 2008 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: May 5, 2008

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

PITTSBURG BOTTOM ON THE SACRAMENTO RIVER
#### § 31.91 Passenger trains, aircraft, and vessels.

Persons who carry on the business of a retail dealer in liquors or of a retail dealer in beer on trains, aircraft, boats, or other conveyances engaged in the business of carrying passengers may conduct that business throughout the passenger carrying train, aircraft, boat, or other vessel, after filing only one registration under this part. Such persons must specify on the registration form the number of passenger carriers for which registration is being completed.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY ELEV

 1,900.58

 1,900.99

 1,901.05

 1,900.90

 1,901.59

 1,901.50

 1,901.37

 1,900.62

 1,900.44

 1,900.38

 1,900.56

 1,900.71

 1,900.63

 1,900.83

 1,900.66

 1,901.02

 1,900.87

 1,901.09

 1,900.96

 1,900.58

 1,900.32

 1,900.63

 1,900.77

 1,900.64

 1,900.45

 1,900.50

 1,900.94

 1,900.93

 1,901.14

 1,900.51

 1,900.85

 13,602

 13,904

 13,948

 13,837

 14,352

 14,285

 14,188

 13,631

 13,499

 13,455

 13,587

 13,698

 13,639

 13,786

 13,661

 13,926

 13,815

 13,978

 13,882

 13,602

 13,411

 13,639

 13,742

 13,646

 13,506

 13,543

 13,867

 13,859

 14,016

 13,550

 13,801

STORAGE

-309

+302

+44

-111

+515

-67

-97

-557

-132

-44

+132

+111

-59

+147

-125

+265

-111

+163

-96

-280

-191

+228

+103

-96

-140

+37

+324

-8

+157

-466

+251

CHANGE

1,482

1,944

1,959

1,938

2,001

1,952

1,957

1,685

1,887

1,877

1,936

1,972

1,926

1,947

1,978

1,972

1,977

1,974

1,958

1,942

1,964

1,979

1,977

1,953

1,926

1,936

1,711

1,971

1,959

1,815

1,939

INFLOW

 0

 0

 0

 0

 21

 39

 80

 80

 80

 80

 80

 80

 80

 80

 80

 80

 80

 80

 80

 80

 80

 80

 80

 80

 80

 80

 80

 80

 80

 80

 80

POWER

 1,188

 1,214

 1,358

 1,414

 1,557

 1,801

 1,681

 1,566

 1,511

 1,422

 1,412

 1,437

 1,439

 1,425

 1,352

 1,320

 1,348

 1,444

 1,423

 1,388

 1,382

 1,353

 1,337

 1,258

 1,161

 1,059

 1,085

 1,646

 1,291

 1,044

 913

SPILL

 148

 148

 148

 148

 126

 109

 68

 68

 68

 68

 68

 68

 68

 68

 68

 68

 68

 68

 68

 68

 68

 68

 68

 68

 68

 68

 68

 68

 68

 68

 68

OUTLETS

 5

 6

 5

 6

 5

 5

 6

 5

 6

 6

 6

 6

 6

 6

 6

 6

 5

 8

 7

 5

 5

 5

 4

 4

 4

 6

 6

 5

 6

 8

 7

C.F.S.

 .25

 .29

 .22

 .27

 .23

 .25

 .29

 .21

 .27

 .26

 .27

 .26

 .29

 .28

 .29

 .26

 .25

 .36

 .34

 .24

 .21

 .25

 .18

 .19

 .19

 .27

 .28

 .25

 .29

 .37

 .31

INCHES

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

MAY 2021 LEWISTON LAKE DAILY OPERATIONS RUN DATE: June 1, 2021

IN LAKE

EVAPORATION

C.F.S. FRANCIS CARR

COMPUTED*

ACRE-FEET

RELEASE - C.F.S. 

TOTALS -110 59,394 2,060 2,527 42,229 176 8.17

ACRE-FEET -110 117,808 4,086 5,012 83,761 349

* COMPUTED INFLOW IS THE SUM OF CHANGE IN STORAGE, RELEASES AND EVAPORATION.

(1) OUTLET RELEASE INCLUDES FISH RELEASE.

(2) INCHES OF EVAPORATION TAKEN FROM PAN AT TRINITY RIVER HATCHERY.

SUMMARY

RELEASE (ACRE-FEET)

TOTAL POWER 4,086

TOTAL RIVER 92,859 117,567

 13,911

 24,708

RIVER

JUDGE FRANCIS CARR POWERPLANT

TOTAL RELEASE

JUDGE (2)

(1) POWERPLANT

 297

 424

 426

 426

 32

 32

 171

 247

 289

 323

 303

 325

 363

 294

 535

 364

 532

 292

 428

 542

 525

 358

 436

 591

 684

 704

 309

 176

 435

 850

 744

 12,457

 24,708
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 96-6313

JOHN PAUL TURNER,

Petitioner - Appellant,

versus

DAVID S. KUYKENDALL, Virginia Department of

Corrections, District 12, Staunton, Virginia,

Respondent - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Roanoke. Samuel G. Wilson, District Judge.

(CA-96-131-R)

Submitted: June 20, 1996 Decided: July 1, 1996

Before HALL, WILKINS, and HAMILTON, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

John Paul Turner, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Appellant appeals the district court's orders dismissing his

petition for failure to state a coherent claim and denying his Fed.

R. Civ. P. 59(e) motion. We dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction because the orders are not appealable. This court may exercise jurisdiction only over final orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1291 (1988),

and certain interlocutory and collateral orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1292

(1988); Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(b); Cohen v. Beneficial Indus. Loan

Corp., 337 U.S. 541 (1949). The orders here appealed are not appealable final, interlocutory, or collateral orders. See Domino

Sugar Corp. v. Sugar Workers Local Union 392, 10 F.3d 1064, 1067

(4th Cir. 1993).

We deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal

as interlocutory. We deny the motion for oral argument and dispense

with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument

would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
### §360bbb–1. Dispute resolution

If, regarding an obligation concerning drugs or devices under this Act or section 351 of the Public Health Service Act [42 U.S.C. 262], there is a scientific controversy between the Secretary and a person who is a sponsor, applicant, or manufacturer and no specific provision of the Act involved, including a regulation promulgated under such Act, provides a right of review of the matter in controversy, the Secretary shall, by regulation, establish a procedure under which such sponsor, applicant, or manufacturer may request a review of such controversy, including a review by an appropriate scientific advisory panel described in section 355(n) of this title or an advisory committee described in section 360e(g)(2)(B) of this title. Any such review shall take place in a timely manner. The Secretary shall promulgate such regulations within 1 year after November 21, 1997.

(June 25, 1938, ch. 675, §562, as added Pub. L. 105–115, title IV, §404, Nov. 21, 1997, 111 Stat. 2368.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

This Act, referred to in text, is the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act, act June 25, 1938, ch. 675, 52 Stat. 1040, which is classified generally to this chapter. For complete classification of this Act to the Code, see section 301 of this title and Tables.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date

Section effective 90 days after Nov. 21, 1997, except as otherwise provided, see section 501 of Pub. L. 105–115, set out as an Effective Date of 1997 Amendment note under section 321 of this title.
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff—Appellee, v. Orville Isaac WRIGHT, Defendant—Appellant.

No. 05-7738.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: June 30, 2006.

Decided: July 17, 2006.

Orville Isaac Wright, Appellant Pro Se. John Stuart Bruce, Christine Witcover Dean, Assistant United States Attorneys, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellee.

Before WILLIAMS and SHEDD, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).

PER CURIAM:

Orville Isaac Wright appeals the district court’s orders denying his “Motion for Reduction of Term of Imprisonment ‘Nunc Pro Tunc’ ” pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2000) and denying his motion *278for reconsideration. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm the denial of Wright’s motion for reduction of term of imprisonment for the reasons stated by the district court. *See United States v. Wright,*No. CR-95-76-BR (E.D.N.C.June 28, 2005). Moreover, the district court did not abuse its discretion when it denied Wright’s motion for reconsideration.

We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*AFFIRMED*
Electrical Conductivity, UMHOS

Day High Low Mean TDS

1 231 174 202 141

2 0 0 0 16

3 246 171 204 142

4 240 184 208 145

5 234 183 209 145

6 222 166 197 138

7 219 177 197 138

8 218 180 202 141

9 251 199 221 153

10 243 194 213 148

11 231 180 199 139

12 227 168 186 131

13 213 176 188 132

14 213 176 187 132

15 213 180 193 135

16 220 197 206 143

17 218 201 210 146

18 208 197 203 141

19 203 185 196 137

20 209 196 202 141

21 214 200 206 143

22 211 203 207 144

23 215 199 208 145

24 205 185 197 138

25 201 185 194 136

26 197 185 191 134

27 207 184 197 138

28 209 192 201 140

29 262 195 217 150

30 267 201 229 158

31 251 208 226 156

Total 6096

COMMENT(S):

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

Historical Archive and Report Database

Delta Mendota Canal At Headworks

Period: August 2023 Run Date: 10/11/2023
Internet Archive's Wayback Machine

Loading...

http://www.cpsc.gov//PageFiles/113186/513s.pdf | 2:14:21 Apr 20, 2013

Got an HTTP 302 response at crawl time

Redirecting to...

http://cs.cpsc.gov/ConceptDemo/SearchCPSC.aspx?query=http://www.cpsc.gov/PageFiles/113186/513s.pdf&OldURL=true&autodisplay=true

Impatient?

The Wayback Machine is an initiative of the Internet Archive, a 501(c)(3) non-profit, building a digital library of Internet sites and other cultural artifacts in digital form.Other projects include Open Library & archive-it.org.

Your use of the Wayback Machine is subject to the Internet Archive's Terms of Use.
#### The People of the State of New York ex rel. Andrew Miles Realty Co., Inc., Respondent, against Harry B. Chambers et al., Constituting the Tax *888Commission of the City of New York, Appellants. [225 W. 106th St., Borough of Manhattan.]

— Order unanimously affirmed, with $20 costs and disbursements. No opinion. Present — Peck, P. J., Dore, Callahan, Yan Yoorhis and Shientag, JJ.
```

[Congressional Bills 114th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 3914 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

114th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 3914

To require that the United States flag be flown at half-staff in honor 
   of members of the Armed Forces who die in the line of duty in the 
                             United States.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            November 3, 2015

  Mr. Rouzer introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                       Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To require that the United States flag be flown at half-staff in honor 
   of members of the Armed Forces who die in the line of duty in the 
                             United States.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Half-Staff for Homeland Heroes 
Act''.

SEC. 2. UNITED STATES FLAG REQUIRED TO BE FLOWN AT HALF-STAFF UPON THE 
              DEATH OF A MEMBER OF THE ARMED FORCES IN THE LINE OF 
              DOMESTIC DUTY.

    Section 7(m) of title 4, United States Code, is amended--
            (1) by inserting after ``a member of the Armed Forces from 
        any State, territory, or possession who dies while serving on 
        active duty'' the following: ``in events not covered by the 9th 
        sentence of this subsection''; and
            (2) by inserting before ``As used in this subsection'' the 
        following new sentence: ``The flag shall be flown at half-staff 
        on the day following any day on which a member of the Armed 
        Forces dies from an injury incurred or aggravated in the United 
        States, in the line of duty (and not as a result of misconduct 
        by such member), and while such member was serving on active 
        duty (as defined in section 101(d) of title 10).''.
                                 <all>
```
EXHIBIT 3.36
 LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY AGREEMENT OF
JACKSONVILLE SURGICAL AND MEDICAL AFFILIATES LLC
   ARTICLE I
 OFFICES
   ARTICLE II
 MEMBERS




---



##### 



2




---



##### 



ARTICLE III
 MANAGERS
      3




---



##### 



4




---



##### 



ARTICLE IV
 OFFICERS
  5




---



##### 



6




---



##### 



7




---



##### 



ARTICLE V
 CONTRACTS, LOANS, CHECKS AND DEPOSITS
     ARTICLE VI
 TRANSFER OF PERCENTAGE OWNERSHIP
  ARTICLE VII
 FISCAL YEAR
  8




---



##### 



ARTICLE VIII
 DISTRIBUTIONS
  ARTICLE IX
 SEAL
  ARTICLE X
 WAIVER OF NOTICE
  ARTICLE XI
 INDEMNIFICATION OF OFFICERS AND MANAGERS
  9




---



##### 



ARTICLE XII
 AMENDMENTS
  th
 QHG OF JACKSONVILLE INC.
Sole MemberBy:
    /s/ Howard T. Wall, IIIName:  Howard T. Wall, IIITitle:    Vice President & Secretary 10
---



DXI Energy Inc. 598-999 Canada Place Vancouver,
BCV6C 3E1

Consent of Independent Petroleum Engineers

We hereby consent to the use and reference to our name and
reports evaluating a portion of DXI Energy Inc.s petroleum and natural gas reserves as of December
31, 2016, and the information derived from our reports, as described or
incorporated by reference in: (i) DXI Energy Inc.s Annual Report on Form 20-F
for the year ended December 31, 2016, (ii) DXI Energy Inc.s Registration
Statement on Form F-3 (File No. 333-183587), and (iii) DXI Energy Inc.s
Registration Statements on Form S-8 (Files No. 333-179540 and
333-156772), filed with the United States Securities and Exchange Commission.

Yours Truly, Gustavson Associates, LLC

Dated: April 20, 2017 Boulder, Colorado USA

5757 Central Ave.     Suite
D     Boulder, Co. 80301 USA    
1-303-443-2209     FAX
1-303-443-3156     http://www.gustavson.com

---
§ 30.815 Are there special rules that OWCP will use to determine the extent of a deceased covered Part E employee's compensable wage-loss? ( a ) For purposes of adjudicating a claim of a survivor of a deceased covered Part E employee only, OWCP will presume that such employee experienced wage-loss for each calendar year subsequent to the calendar year of his or her death through and including the calendar year in which the employee would have reached normal retirement age under the Social Security Act. During these particular calendar years, OWCP will also presume that the deceased covered Part E employee's subsequent calendar-year wages did not exceed 50 percent of his or her average annual wage as determined under § 30.810.
( b ) Except as provided in paragraph (a) of this section, OWCP will calculate the wage-loss of a deceased covered Part E employee in conformance with the provisions of §§ 30.800 through 30.811.
( c ) If OWCP determines that a deceased covered Part E employee had an aggregate of not less than ten calendar years of adjusted earnings that did not exceed 50 percent of his or her average annual earnings, it will pay the eligible surviving beneficiary(s) additional compensation (the basic survivor award payable under section 7385s-3(a)(1) is $125,000) in the amount of $25,000 pursuant to section 7385s-3(a)(2) of the Act. In the alternative, if OWCP determines that the aggregate number of such years is not less than 20 years, it will pay the eligible surviving beneficiary(s) additional compensation in the amount of $50,000 pursuant to section 7385s-3(a)(3).
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY HIGH

 248

 251

 257

 263

 262

 264

 269

 268

 268

 268

 271

 272

 273

 274

 278

 280

 280

 273

 281

 278

 281

 282

 280

 276

 271

 272

 280

 279

 273

 262

 269

 230

 234

 239

 242

 245

 243

 246

 247

 249

 241

 245

 245

 247

 249

 250

 250

 252

 250

 241

 256

 260

 254

 256

 246

 232

 241

 241

 239

 234

 230

 229

 239

 245

 248

 254

 254

 255

 258

 258

 258

 255

 260

 258

 260

 262

 264

 266

 266

 264

 265

 267

 272

 269

 268

 262

 257

 258

 260

 255

 250

 245

 250

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

MAY 2002 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: June 5, 2002

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

HOLLAND TRACT ON OLD RIVER
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY ELEV

 222.29

 222.46

 222.82

 223.48

 222.74

 222.34

 221.39

 220.89

 220.40

 220.67

 220.05

 219.23

 219.60

 218.67

 219.86

 218.93

 219.27

 219.77

 219.16

 219.01

 220.25

 221.53

 222.04

 221.79

 221.91

 221.50

 221.15

 221.33

 221.62

 221.48

 221.85

 49,155

 49,607

 50,566

 52,330

 50,353

 49,288

 46,784

 45,472

 44,192

 44,897

 43,282

 41,170

 42,119

 39,750

 42,790

 40,407

 41,272

 42,557

 40,991

 40,610

 43,801

 47,152

 48,491

 47,835

 48,150

 47,073

 46,154

 46,626

 47,388

 47,020

 47,992

STORAGE

+345

+452

+959

+1,764

-1,977

-1,065

-2,504

-1,312

-1,280

+705

-1,615

-2,112

+949

-2,369

+3,040

-2,383

+865

+1,285

-1,566

-381

+3,191

+3,351

+1,339

-656

+315

-1,077

-919

+472

+762

-368

+972

CHANGE

3,197

3,319

3,384

3,418

3,477

3,507

3,282

2,638

2,264

1,094

416

416

395

283

219

166

40

244

156

754

1,450

1,456

1,464

1,570

1,632

1,502

1,722

1,422

1,431

1,522

1,643

PUMPING

 4,639

 5,008

 5,012

 5,009

 5,718

 5,582

 5,505

 6,245

 6,267

 6,038

 6,456

 7,015

 2,659

 6,887

 3,084

 8,217

 7,149

 7,319

 7,481

 7,383

 6,554

 6,484

 7,055

 5,792

 6,022

 6,721

 7,396

 7,570

 7,859

 7,846

 7,224

PUMPING

 2,365

 2,333

 2,334

 2,336

 3,500

 3,480

 3,451

 2,148

 1,710

 0

 0

 0

 567

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 1,720

 1,219

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

PUMPING

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 52

 113

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

GEN.

*

+127

+30

+27

+1

-193

+3

-199

-59

-106

-70

-206

-237

+192

+85

+323

+389

+397

+321

-154

-52

-18

+56

-4

-119

-9

-171

-107

-159

-40

-112

+347

OR

UNITED STATES 

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION

CONSOLIDATED STATE-FEDERAL O'NEILL FOREBAY May 3, 2019

DAILY OPERATIONS

MARCH 2019 RUN DATE:

IN LAKE GEN.

ACRE-FEET O'NEILL

RELEASE - C.F.S. 

TOTALS -818 49,483 165 27,163 195,196 +283

ACRE-FEET -818 98,150 327 53,878 387,171

SUMMARY

 134

RELEASE (ACRE-FEET)

O'NEILL GEN. 327

SAN LUIS PUMP 53,878 134

 48,810

DOS AMIGOS PUMP 387,171

DELIVERIES 

S. LUIS O'NEILL

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 440

 787

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 1,227

 2,434

CALIF. DOS AMIGOS

AQUEDUCT

3,855

4,219

4,419

4,817

4,937

5,015

4,612

5,152

5,173

5,369

5,431

5,771

3,117

5,324

4,075

6,460

6,761

6,729

6,689

6,489

6,731

6,662

6,270

5,731

5,777

4,848

5,318

6,545

6,852

6,251

5,791

 171,190

 339,555

S. LUIS

DELIV.

GAINS(+)

LOSS(-)

C.F.S.

INFLOW - C.F.S.

STATE OF CALIFORNIA

THE RESOURCES AGENCY

DEPARTMENT OF WATER RESOURCES

STATE WATER PROJECT

TOTAL 441,510

 561

* DAILY DEL. FIGURES UNAVAILABLE. TOT. DEL. IS INCLUDED IN COMPUTING MONTHLY TOTALS 

Table 18
### TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

JUDGMENT RENDERED NO VEMBER 30, 2016

NO. 03

- 16

- 00196

- CR

Jeff Ellis Nanny, Appellant

v.

The State of Texas, Appellee

APPEAL FROM THE 51ST DISTRICT COURT OF TOM GREEN COUNTY

BEFORE JUSTICES PURYEAR , PEMBERTON, AND FIE LD

AFFIRMED

-- OPINION BY JUSTICE PURYEAR

This is an appeal from the judgment of conviction rend ered by the trial court. Having reviewed

the record and the parties’ arguments, the Court holds that there was no reversible error in the

trial court’s judgment . Therefore, the Court affirms the trial court’s judgment of conviction

.

Because appell ant is indigent and unable to pay costs, no adjudication of costs is made.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

DAY HIGH

 1,688

 2,092

 2,412

 1,812

 1,909

 1,674

 1,521

 1,171

 1,234

 1,181

 1,102

 1,381

 1,720

 1,746

 2,079

 2,119

 1,955

 1,378

 1,585

 1,424

 1,372

 1,597

 1,724

 1,925

 2,241

 2,612

 2,983

 3,173

 3,498

 4,113

 267

 299

 327

 315

 320

 321

 321

 292

 290

 264

 268

 269

 267

 263

 259

 282

 262

 274

 297

 276

 315

 421

 352

 353

 346

 341

 321

 353

 354

 371

 556

 694

 847

 719

 756

 648

 629

 478

 463

 440

 459

 527

 605

 598

 640

 689

 737

 555

 686

 704

 726

 809

 812

 825

 910

 979

 1,020

 1,132

 1,300

 1,635

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

APRIL 2021 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: May 5, 2021

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

14 DAY

ACCUM

MEAN

14 DAY

AVG

MEAN

 4,860

 5,191

 5,691

 6,113

 6,556

 6,895

 7,236

 7,345

 7,507

 7,631

 7,755

 7,943

 8,227

 8,419

 8,503

 8,498

 8,388

 8,224

 8,154

 8,210

 8,307

 8,638

 8,987

 9,372

 9,823

 10,275

 10,690

 11,224

 11,884

 12,830

 347

 371

 407

 437

 468

 493

 517

 525

 536

 545

 554

 567

 588

 601

 607

 607

 599

 587

 582

 586

 593

 617

 642

 669

 702

 734

 764

 802

 849

 916

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

EMMATON TOP ON THE SACRAMENTO RIVER
#### Rosa Mendoza SANCHEZ, Petitioner, v. Alberto R. GONZALES, Attorney General, Respondent.

No. 05-76551.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted July 17, 2006.*

Decided July 21, 2006.

Rosa Mendoza Sanchez, Riverside, CA, for Petitioner.

CAC-District Counsel, Esq., Office of the District Counsel Department of Homeland Security, Los Angeles, CA, Ronald E. Lefevre, Chief Counsel, Office of the District Counsel Department of Homeland Security, San Francisco, CA, Linda S. Wernery, Esq., William C. Minick, Esq., U.S. Department of Justice Civil Div./Office of Immigration Lit., Washington, DC, for Respondent.

Before: B. FLETCHER, HAWKINS and THOMAS, Circuit Judges.

*

 This panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. *See*Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

MEMORANDUM **

Respondent’s motion for summary disposition is granted because the questions raised by this petition for review are so insubstantial as not to require further argument. *See United States v. Hooton,*693 F.2d 857, 858 (9th Cir.1982) (per curiam) (stating standard); *see also Jimenez-Angeles,*291 F.3d 594 (9th Cir.2002). Accordingly, this petition for review is denied.

PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED.

**

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.