alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### § 216.80 General.

The Railroad Retirement Act provides an annuity for the surviving parent of a deceased employee. The deceased employee must have completed 10 years of railroad service and have had a current connection with the railroad industry at the time of his or her death. A parent may only receive an annuity based on age.
#### § 404.1053 “Qualified benefits” under a cafeteria plan.

We do not include as wages any *qualified benefits* under a cafeteria plan as described in section 125 of the Code if such payment would not be treated as wages without regard to such plan and it is reasonable to believe that (if section 125 applied for purposes of this section) section 125 would not treat any wages as constructively received. This includes any *qualified benefit* made to you, or on your behalf, pursuant to a salary reduction agreement between you and your employer. The Internal Revenue Service decides whether any plan is a cafeteria plan under section 125 of the Code and whether any benefit under the plan is a *qualified benefit.*

[55 FR 7310, Mar. 1, 1990]
No. 11,943.

#### Fort *v.*Roberts, et al.

Decided November 28, 1927.

Action on promissory notes. Judgment for plaintiffs.

*Affirmed.*

*On Application for Supersedeas.*

1. Bills and *Notes*— Failure *of Consideration.*Where defendant - executed notes in payment of his share of the expense of building a drain ditch, the ditch being built and serving its purpose, he could not avoid payment of his notes because the ditch was not placed on a. certain section line as provided in the agreement, under the contention that this constituted a failure of consideration.

*Error to the District Court of Bio Grande County, Ron. J. C. Wiley, Judge.*

Mr. James P. Veerkamp, for plaintiff in error.

Mr. George M. Cornett, Mr. D. E. Newcomb, for defendants in error.

*Department One.*

Mr. Justice Denison

delivered the opinion of the court.

Roberts, Irons and Pike, trustees, had judgment against Fort, plaintiff in error, on promissory notes, and he brings error and asks for supersedeas. The defense was failure of consideration.

Fourteen farmers entered into a written agreement to build a drainage ditch. Each was to give his note for three hundred and fifty dollars for each quarter section of his, to be drained, and plaintiffs below were appointed *573trustees and attorneys in fact to carry out the project. They built the ditch and it serves its purposes, but defendant refused to pay his two notes given pursuant to the contract, because, he says, the ditch was not placed on a certain section line as provided by the agreement, but south thereof and entirely across defendant’s lands, to his damage. He filed a counterclaim on this point but abandoned it.

If this was a failure of consideration it was a partial failure only; but, by the negotiable instrument act, partial failure is a defense pro tanto.. C. L. § 3845. In order, however, to hold this to be even a partial failure we must say that the exact position of the ditch was a part of the consideration. We do not think that such is the case. To build a ditch requires a grade the necessities of which will determine the location and neither can be exactly determined without survey nor beforehand except approximately. It must have been contemplated, then, by the parties to the agreement, that any necessary deviation from the location stated therein should be made by the trustees. The evidence is that the change was made necessary by the discovery of a road along the section line in question and that the deviation was as little as possible. Good drainage resulted. We can see no failure of consideration here. As to whether plaintiff in error has any right to damages we express no opinion.

Supersedeas denied and judgment affirmed.

Mr. Chibe Justice Burke, Mr. Justice Whit *fobs*and Mr. Justice Sheaeor concur.
[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 73 (Friday, April 15, 2011)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Page 21299]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2011-9184]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

40 CFR Part 281

[EPA-R10-UST-2011-0097; FRL-9296-1]


Oregon: Tentative Approval of State Underground Storage Tank 
Program: Public Hearing Cancellation

AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

ACTION: Proposed rule; cancellation of notice of public hearing.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This document cancels a public hearing on a proposed 
rulemaking relating to the State of Oregon's application for final 
approval of its Underground Storage Tank (UST) Program under Subtitle I 
of the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA). The Environmental 
Protection Agency did not receive any comments or a request for a 
public hearing.

DATES: The public hearing originally scheduled for April 13, 2011 at 9 
a.m. has been cancelled.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Katherine Griffith, U. S. 
Environmental Protection Agency, Region 10, 1200 Sixth Avenue, Suite 
900, Mail Stop: OCE-082, Seattle, WA 98101, phone number: (206) 553-
2901, e-mail: <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#2047524946464954480e4b4154484552494e45604550410e474f56"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="1176637877777865793f7a7065797463787f74517461703f767e67">[email protected]</span></a>.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: A notice of proposed rulemaking and a notice 
of public hearing that appeared in the Federal Register on Wednesday, 
March 2, 2011 (76 FR 11404) announced that a public hearing was 
scheduled for April 13, 2011, at 9 a.m. at the United States 
Environmental Protection Agency, 805 SW. Broadway, Suite 500, Portland, 
Oregon 97205.
    The public comment period for the proposed rulemaking expired on 
April 1, 2011. The notice of proposed rulemaking and notice of public 
hearing instructed those interested in testifying at the public hearing 
to submit a request. As of Monday, April 4, 2011, no one has requested 
to speak. Therefore, the public hearing scheduled for April 13, 2011, 
is cancelled.

    Dated: April 8, 2011.
Dennis J. McLerran,
Regional Administrator, Region 10.
[FR Doc. 2011-9184 Filed 4-14-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
### §§8601, 8602. Repealed. Pub. L. 107–110, title X, §1011(5)(B), Jan. 8, 2002, 115 Stat. 1986

Section 8601, Pub. L. 89–10, title XIII, §13001, as added Pub. L. 103–382, title I, §101, Oct. 20, 1994, 108 Stat. 3876, set forth findings.

Section 8602, Pub. L. 89–10, title XIII, §13002, as added Pub. L. 103–382, title I, §101, Oct. 20, 1994, 108 Stat. 3876, set forth purpose of subchapter.
### §2361. Treatment of transnational criminal organizations in suspicious transactions reports of the Financial Crimes Enforcement Network

#### (a) Filing instructions

Not later than 180 days after April 24, 2024, the Director of the Financial Crimes Enforcement Network shall issue guidance or instructions to United States financial institutions for filing reports on suspicious transactions required under section 1010.320 of title 31, Code of Federal Regulations, related to suspected fentanyl trafficking by transnational criminal organizations.

#### (b) Prioritization of reports relating to fentanyl trafficking or transnational criminal organizations

The Director shall prioritize research into reports described in subsection (a) that indicate a connection to trafficking of fentanyl or related synthetic opioids or financing of suspected transnational criminal organizations.

(Pub. L. 118–50, div. E, title II, §3202, Apr. 24, 2024, 138 Stat. 941.)
§ 30.520 How are overpayments collected? ( a ) When an overpayment has been made to a recipient who is entitled to further payments, the recipient shall refund to OWCP the amount of the overpayment as soon as the error is discovered or his or her attention is called to same. If no refund is made, OWCP shall recover the overpayment by reducing any further lump-sum payments due currently or in the future, taking into account the financial circumstances of the recipient, and any other relevant factors, so as to minimize any hardship. Should the recipient die before collection has been completed, further collection shall be made by decreasing later payments, if any, payable under EEOICPA with respect to the underlying occupational illness or covered illness.
( b ) When an overpayment has been made to a recipient and OWCP is unable to recover the overpayment by reducing compensation due currently, the recipient shall refund to OWCP the amount of the overpayment as soon as the error is discovered or his or her attention is called to same. The overpayment is subject to the provisions of the Federal Claims Collection Act of 1966, as amended (31 U.S.C. 3701 *et seq.*), and may be reported to the Internal Revenue Service as income. If the recipient fails to make such refund, OWCP may recover the overpayment through any available means, including offset of salary, annuity benefits, or other Federal payments, including tax refunds as authorized by the Tax Refund Offset Program, or referral of the debt to a collection agency or to the Department of Justice.
§ 30.214 How does a claimant establish that the employee is a member of the Special Exposure Cohort? ( a ) For purposes of establishing eligibility as a member of the Special Exposure Cohort (SEC) under § 30.210(a)(1), the employee must have been a DOE employee, a DOE contractor employee, or an atomic weapons employee who meets any of the following requirements: ( 1 ) The employee was so employed for a number of workdays aggregating at least 250 workdays before February 1, 1992, at a gaseous diffusion plant located in Paducah, Kentucky; Portsmouth, Ohio; or Oak Ridge, Tennessee; and during such employment: ( i ) Was monitored through the use of dosimetry badges for exposure at the plant of the external parts of the employee's body to radiation; or
( ii ) Worked in a job that had exposures comparable to a job that is or was monitored through the use of dosimetry badges.
( 2 ) The employee was so employed before January 1, 1974, by DOE or a DOE contractor or subcontractor on Amchitka Island, Alaska, and was exposed to ionizing radiation in the performance of duty related to the Long Shot, Milrow, or Cannikin underground nuclear tests.
( 3 ) The employee is a member of a group or class of employees subsequently designated as additional members of the SEC by HHS.
( b ) For purposes of satisfying the 250 workday requirement of paragraph (a)(1) of this section, the claimant may aggregate the days of service at more than one gaseous diffusion plant.
( c ) Proof of employment by the DOE or a DOE contractor, or an atomic weapons employer, for the requisite time periods set forth in paragraph (a) of this section, may be made by the submission of any trustworthy records that, on their face or in conjunction with other such records, establish that the employee was so employed and the time period(s) of such employment. If the evidence shows that exposure occurred while the employee was employed by an employer that would have to be designated by DOE as an atomic weapons employer under section 7384l(4) of the Act to be a covered employer, and that the employer has not been so designated, OWCP will deny the claim on the ground that the employer is not a covered atomic weapons employer.
( d ) Records from the following sources may be considered as evidence for purposes of establishing employment or presence at a covered facility: ( 1 ) Records or documents created by any federal government agency (including verified information submitted for security clearance), any tribal government, or any state, county, city or local government office, agency, department, board or other entity, or other public agency or office.
( 2 ) Records or documents created as a byproduct of any regularly conducted business activity or by an entity that acted as a contractor or subcontractor to the DOE.
### §6431. Eligibility

A State agency is eligible for assistance under this subpart if such State agency is responsible for providing free public education for children and youth—

(1) in institutions for neglected or delinquent children and youth;

(2) attending community day programs for neglected or delinquent children and youth; or

(3) in adult correctional institutions.

(Pub. L. 89–10, title I, §1411, as added Pub. L. 107–110, title I, §101, Jan. 8, 2002, 115 Stat. 1581.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Prior Provisions

A prior section 6431, Pub. L. 89–10, title I, §1411, as added Pub. L. 103–382, title I, §101, Oct. 20, 1994, 108 Stat. 3592, related to eligibility, prior to the general amendment of this subchapter by Pub. L. 107–110.
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

MEMORANDUM OPINION

No. 04-21-00010-CV

Marcos MORALES,

Appellant

v.

EGZ, LLC,

Appellee

From the County Court, Guadalupe County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2020-CV-0298

Honorable Bill Squires, Judge Presiding

PER CURIAM

Sitting: Rebeca C. Martinez, Chief Justice

Patricia O. Alvarez, Justice

Lori I. Valenzuela, Justice

Delivered and Filed: July 7, 2021

APPEAL DISMISSED FOR WANT OF PROSECUTION

Appellant’s brief was originally due on April 26, 2021. Appellant was granted one 

extension of time, until June 4, 2021. Neither the brief nor a motion for extension of time was 

filed. On June 15, 2021, this court ordered appellant to file, no later than June 28, 2021, his brief 

and a written response reasonably explaining (1) his failure to timely file the brief, and (2) why

appellee is not significantly injured by appellant’s failure to timely file a brief. Our order cautioned 

appellant that if he failed to file a brief and the written response by June 28, 2021, we would 

dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution. See TEX. R. APP. P. 38.8(a); see also TEX. R. APP.
04-21-00010-CV

- 2 -

P. 42.3(c) (allowing involuntary dismissal if appellant fails to comply with court order). Appellant 

has not responded to our order; therefore, this appeal is dismissed for want of prosecution. All 

pending motions are denied as moot.

PER CURIAM
PD-0716-15

COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS

AUSTIN, TEXAS

Transmitted 8/17/2015 4:47:47 PM

Accepted 8/18/2015 11:24:01 AM

ABEL ACOSTA

CLERK
# Materials Not Included in **Airworthiness Directive (AD) Docket**

Docket Number: FAA- 2010 - 1206 Directorate Identifier: 2009NM216AD

SRD SR10570019, RK --- 4/23/09 SRD SR10570048, RK --- 10/14/10

Name/Description of Item(s) Not Included in FDMS Docket and Maintained in the Supplemental AD Docket 

### MA **Y BE VIEWED AT:** Federal Aviation Administration

Transport Airplane Directorate Rules Docket 1601 Lind Ave. SW., Renton, WA 98057 425.227.1221 **DURING THE HOURS OF:** 9 a.m. and 3 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays. Form Date: 03/05/2008
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
This Schedule contains summary financial information extracted from (a) the
Balance Sheet and Statement of Operations filed as part of the Quarterly Report
on Form 10-Q and is qualified in its entirety by reference to such (b) Report on
Form 10-Q.
</LEGEND>

<S>                            <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                              Year
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                    OCT-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                         OCT-31-1999
<CASH>                                 2,128,274
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                         18,615,496
<ALLOWANCES>                          15,312,935
<INVENTORY>                              572,279
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                      21,720,373
<PP&E>                                 5,211,467
<DEPRECIATION>                         3,039,128
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                        32,317,998
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                 18,268,350
<BONDS>                               12,905,365
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                               60,408
<COMMON>                                  77,008
<OTHER-SE>                            23,294,673
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>          32,317,998
<SALES>                               53,856,414
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                      53,856,414
<CGS>                                 30,850,337
<TOTAL-COSTS>                         57,282,246
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                       1,185,316
<LOSS-PROVISION>                       6,855,221
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                     1,465,765
<INCOME-PRETAX>                      (4,611,148)
<INCOME-TAX>                             367,300
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                  (4,978,448)
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                         (4,978,448)
<EPS-BASIC>                              (.68)
<EPS-DILUTED>                              (.68)


</TABLE>
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
 Washington, D.C. 20549
 
 FORM 8-K
 Current Report Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
 Date of Report (Date of earliest event reported): July 14, 2011 (July 8, 2011)
 Fifth Street Finance Corp.
  Delaware
(State or other jurisdiction
of incorporation)
    
    1-33901
(Commission File Number)
    
    26-1219283
(I.R.S. Employer Identification No.)
 10 Bank Street, 12th Floor  White Plains, NY 10606
 (914) 286-6800
 Former name or former address, if changed since last report
  o
    
    Written communications pursuant to Rule 425 under the Securities Act (17 CFR 230.425)
 o
    
    Soliciting material pursuant to Rule 14a-12 under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.14a-12)
 o
    
    Pre-commencement communications pursuant to Rule 14d-2(b) under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.14d-2(b))
 o
    
    Pre-commencement communications pursuant to Rule 13e-4(c) under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.13e-4(c))




---



##### 



Item 1.01. Entry into a Material Definitive Agreement.
    Item 2.03. Creation of a Direct Financial Obligation or an Obligation Under an Off-Balance Sheet
Arrangement of a Registrant.
  Item 9.01. Financial Statements and Exhibits.
  Exhibit No.
    
    Description10.1
    
    Amendment No. 1 to Amended and Restated Senior Secured
Revolving Credit Agreement and Amendment No. 2 to the
Guarantee, Pledge and Security Agreement, among Registrant,
FSFC Holdings, Inc., Fifth Street Fund of Funds LLC, ING Capital LLC, Royal Bank of Canada, UBS Loan Finance LLC,
Morgan Stanley Bank, N.A., Key Equipment Finance, Inc.,
Deutsche Bank Trust Company Americas and Patriot National
Bank, dated as of July 8, 2011.10.2
    
    Incremental Assumption Agreement among Registrant, FSFC Holdings, Inc., Fifth Street Fund of Funds LLC, ING Capital
LLC and Royal Bank of Canada, dated as of July 8, 2011.99.1
    
    Press Release dated July 14, 2011.




---



##### 



SIGNATURES
  Date:  July 14, 2011
    FIFTH STREET FINANCE CORP.By:
    /s/ Bernard D. BermanName:
    Bernard D. BermanTitle:
    President
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

DAY HIGH

 25,229

 23,910

 23,369

 19,181

 19,631

 18,881

 17,364

 16,405

 16,849

 18,778

 19,397

 17,567

 16,364

 17,142

 14,969

 14,434

 15,326

 14,808

 15,940

 15,241

 15,558

 18,012

 16,117

 16,335

 24,894

 24,401

 24,186

 26,186

 25,989

 25,784

 17,976

 16,276

 9,662

 9,884

 10,711

 9,797

 10,935

 11,109

 9,945

 11,633

 13,195

 10,938

 12,099

 10,615

 10,517

 9,050

 9,320

 8,085

 10,921

 9,854

 11,174

 11,255

 10,520

 10,446

 10,316

 15,649

 16,556

 17,807

 17,369

 18,457

 21,724

 19,974

 16,505

 15,418

 15,799

 14,834

 14,684

 13,797

 13,330

 15,473

 16,207

 14,185

 14,411

 13,899

 12,393

 11,434

 11,630

 11,723

 12,588

 13,003

 13,429

 14,629

 13,561

 13,738

 17,873

 20,856

 21,293

 22,218

 22,186

 21,893

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

NOVEMBER 2014 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: December 1, 2014

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

PORT CHICAGO TOP IN SUISUN BAY
§ 345.303 Computation of rate. ( a ) With respect to compensation in a calendar year that begins after December 31, 1992, the Board will compute, by October 15, 1992, and by October 15 of each subsequent year, a contribution rate for each employer (other than a new employer) in accordance with the following 8-step process: ( 1 ) *Step 1.* Compute the employer's *benefit ratio* as of the preceding June 30;
( 2 ) *Step 2.* Compute the employer's *reserve ratio* as of the preceding June 30 and subtract it from the *benefit ratio;*
( 3 ) *Step 3.* Subtract the *pooled credit ratio* (if any) for the calendar year;
( 4 ) *Step 4.* Multiply the Step 3 result by 100, in order to obtain a percentage rate, and then round such rate to the nearest 100th of one percent. If the rate so computed is zero or less than zero, the percentage rate will be deemed zero at this point;
( 5 ) *Step 5.* Add 0.65 (the administrative charge) to the percentage rate computed through Step 4.
( 6 ) *Step 6.* Add the *surcharge rate* (if any) for the calendar year;
( 7 ) *Step 7.* Add the *pooled charge ratio* (if any) for the calendar year, as computed to four decimal places and multiplied by 100;
( 8 ) *Step 8.* If the rate computed through Step 7 is greater than 12 percent (or 12.5 percent if a surcharge of 3.5 percent is in effect for the calendar year), reduce the percentage rate so computed to 12 percent or 12.5 percent, if appropriate.
( b ) The percentage rate computed under paragraph (a) of this section is the employer's rate of contribution for the calendar year in question.
( c ) ( 1 ) Any computation that is to be made under this section on the basis of a 12-quarter period ending on a given June 30 shall be made on the basis of a period beginning on January 1, 1990, or on the first day of the first calendar quarter that begins after the date on which the employer first began to pay compensation subject to this part, or on July 1 of the third calendar year preceding that June 30, whichever date is later, and ending on that June 30.
( 2 ) The amount computed under paragraph (c)(1) of this section shall be increased to an amount that bears the same ratio to the amount so computed as 12 bears to the number of calendar quarters on which the computation is based.
| (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|-----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. |
|-----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| /s/ Yale Farar                          |
|-----------------------------------------|
| Yale Farar                              |
| President (Principal Executive Officer) |
| March 31, 2011                          |
|                                    |
| /s/ Mitchell W. Turk                    |
| Mitchell W. Turk                        |
| Chief Financial Officer                 |
| March 31, 2011                          |

----