alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
### **CHAPTER 20—NATIONAL DRUG CONTROL PROGRAM**

#### SUBCHAPTER I—OFFICE OF NATIONAL DRUG CONTROL POLICY

Sec.
1501, 1502. Repealed.
1502a.
Transferred.
1503 to 1505. Repealed.
1505a.
Annual report on development and deployment of narcotics detection technologies.
1506 to 1509. Repealed.

#### SUBCHAPTER II—DRUG-FREE COMMUNITIES

1521.
Findings.
1522.
Purposes.
1523.
Definitions.
1524.
Authorization of appropriations.

#### Part A—Drug-Free Communities Support Program

1531.
Establishment of drug-free communities support program.
1532.
Program authorization.
1533.
Information collection and dissemination with respect to grant recipients.
1534.
Technical assistance and training.
1535.
Supplemental grants for coalition mentoring activities.
1536.
Community-based coalition enhancement grants to address local drug crises.

#### Part B—Advisory Commission

1541 to 1548. Repealed.
### §§900 to 900a–5. Omitted

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Sections were omitted in the general revision of title IX of the Elementary and Secondary Education Act of 1965, Pub. L. 89–10, title IX, as added Pub. L. 92–318, title V, §504(a), June 23, 1972, 86 Stat. 347, by Pub. L. 95–561, title VIII, §802, Nov. 1, 1978, 92 Stat. 2292.

Section 900, Pub. L. 89–10, title IX, §901, as added Pub. L. 92–318, title V, §504(a), June 23, 1972, 86 Stat. 346, contained the Congressional statement of policy with regard to the ethnic heritage program.

Section 900a, Pub. L. 89–10, title IX, §902, as added Pub. L. 92–318, title V, §504(a), June 23, 1972, 86 Stat. 347, authorized grants for the ethnic heritage studies program.

Section 900a–1, Pub. L. 89–10, title IX, §903, as added Pub. L. 92–318, title V, §504(a), June 23, 1972, 86 Stat. 347; amended Pub. L. 93–380, title I, §111(b), Aug. 21, 1974, 88 Stat. 513, described the authorized activities for the ethnic heritage program.

Section 900a–2, Pub. L. 89–10, title IX, §904, as added Pub. L. 92–318, title V, §504(a), June 23, 1972, 86 Stat. 347, related to the form and content of applications for assistance.

Section 900a–3, Pub. L. 89–10, title IX, §905, as added Pub. L. 92–318, title V, §504(a), June 23, 1972, 86 Stat. 347, related to the administration of the program.

Section 900a–4, Pub. L. 89–10, title IX, §906, as added Pub. L. 92–318, title V, §504(a), June 23, 1972, 86 Stat. 348, established the National Advisory Council on Ethnic Heritage Studies.

Section 900a–5, Pub. L. 89–10, title IX, §907, as added Pub. L. 92–318, title V, §504(a), June 23, 1972, 86 Stat. 348; amended Pub. L. 93–380, title I, §111(a)(1), Aug. 21, 1974, 88 Stat. 513, authorized appropriations for fiscal years through fiscal year 1978.
###### Editorial Note on Part 46

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 46 appear by T.D. ATF-457, 66 FR 32220, 32221, June 14, 2001.

#### § 46.207 Articles held in bond.

If the dealer is a manufacturer or an export warehouse proprietor and holds articles in TTB bond on April 1, 2009, the floor stocks tax does not apply to those articles. Likewise, if the dealer holds articles in a customs bonded warehouse on which tax has not been paid or determined, the floor stocks tax does not apply on those articles. However, if the dealer on April 1, 2009, holds articles in a customs bonded warehouse or foreign trade zone on which tax has been paid or determined pursuant to 26 U.S.C. 5703(b)(2)(B), the floor stocks tax applies to those articles.
#### Alexander Stein v. Emily L. Felt, Impleaded, etc.

Motion to dismiss appeal denied. Present—Ingraham, P. J., Laughlin, Scott, Dowling and Hotchkiss, JJ.
Exhibit 4.5
 US AIRWAYS GROUP, INC.
2011 INCENTIVE AWARD PLAN
RESTRICTED STOCK UNIT (CASH-SETTLED) AWARD GRANT NOTICE
 Company Plan Restricted Stock Units Award Award Agreement
 Participant: ________________________
 Date of Grant: ___________, 20____
 Number of Restricted Stock Units: __________________________
  -
    
    ____ % of the Restricted Stock Units shall vest on ___________, 20___;-
    
    ____ % of the Restricted Stock Units shall vest on ___________, 20___; and-
    
    ____ % of the Restricted Stock Units shall vest on ___________, 20___;




---



##### 



US AIRWAYS GROUP, INC.
2011 INCENTIVE AWARD PLAN
RESTRICTED STOCK UNIT (CASH-SETTLED) AWARD AGREEMENT
 Grant Notice Award Agreement Company Plan Restricted Stock Units Award
  1. NUMBER OF RESTRICTED STOCK UNITS AND CASH PAYMENT. Company Stock
 2. VESTING provided, however
 (a)
 (b)
 (c)
  3. DIVIDENDS.




---



##### 



further provided that
 4. PAYMENT
 5. DELIVERY OF CASH PAYMENT.
 (a)
 (b)
 6. COMPLIANCE WITH APPLICABLE LAW.
 7. TRANSFER RESTRICTIONS.
 2




---



##### 



8. AWARD NOT A SERVICE CONTRACT
 9. UNSECURED OBLIGATION.
 10. WITHHOLDING OBLIGATIONS.
 11. NOTICES
 12. MISCELLANEOUS
 (a)
 (b)
 (c)
 (d)
 3




---



##### 



(e)
 13. DATA PRIVACY WAIVER.
 (a) Data
 (b)
 (c)
 (d)
  14. HEADINGS.
 15. SEVERABILITY
 16. GOVERNING PLAN DOCUMENT
 4
EXHIBIT 12
                     AMERITECH CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
                COMPUTATION OF RATIO OF EARNINGS TO FIXED CHARGES
                                   (Unaudited)
                                        
                              (Dollars in Millions)
                                        
                                                  Six Months Ended
                                                         June 30
                                                   --------------
                                                 1998         1997
                                                 ----         ----
EARNINGS
--------
Income before interest, income taxes
 and undistributed equity earnings (1).....    $3,723        $2,017
Portion of rent expense
 representing interest.....................        38            36
Michigan Single Business tax...............        22            21
Preferred dividends of subsidiaries (2)....        24             8
                                               ------        ------
Total earnings (3).........................    $3,807        $2,082
                                               ------        ------
FIXED CHARGES
-------------
Interest expense...........................    $  322        $  248
Capitalized interest.......................        14            13
Portion of rent expense
 representing interest.....................        38            36
Preferred dividends of subsidiaries (2)....        24             8
                                               ------        ------
Total fixed charges........................    $  398        $  305
                                               ------        ------
Ratio of earnings to fixed charges.........      9.57          6.83
                                               ======        ======


(1)  Income before interest, income taxes and undistributed equity
     earnings for the six months ended June 30, 1998 includes a one-
     time pretax gain of $1,543 million ($1,012 million after-tax) from
     the sale of substantially all of our shares in Telecom Corporation
     of New Zealand Limited (TCNZ).
     
(2)  As required by SEC rules, we have grossed up the preferred stock
     dividends to an amount representing the pretax earnings needed to
     cover the dividend requirements.
     
(3)  Earnings represent income before income taxes and fixed charges.
     Since we have already deducted the Michigan Single Business Tax
     (the Tax) and rental expense to arrive at income before interest
     and income taxes, the Tax and the one-third portion of rental
     expense considered to be fixed charges are added back to arrive at
     total earnings.
§ 229.43 When a divorced spouse can no longer be included in computing an annuity under the overall minimum. A divorced spouse's inclusion in the computation of the overall minimum rate ends the earlier of: ( a ) The month before the month in which the divorced spouse dies; or
( b ) The month before the month the employee dies; or
( c ) The month before the month in which the divorced spouse remarries; or
( d ) The month before the month in which the divorced spouse becomes entitled to a retirement or disability benefit under the Social Security Act based upon a primary insurance amount which is equal to or exceeds the divorced spouse annuity before reduction for age.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY HIGH

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 21,026

 20,079

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 5,649

 5,304

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 11,977

 12,502

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

AUGUST 2017 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: September 28, 2017

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

PORT CHICAGO TOP IN SUISUN BAY
No. 11,777.

#### Duncan *v.*The People.

Decided December 27, 1927.

Plaintiff in error was convicted of second degree murder.

*Affirmed.*

1. Criminal *Law*— Variance *Between Information ami Proof.*A variance of two days between information and proof of the date of an offense held immaterial.

2. New *Trial*— Court *Discretion.*In the absence of a showing of abuse of discretion, the ruling of a trial court in denying a motion for a new trial will not be disturbed on review.

*Error to the District Court of Las Ammas County, Hon. A. F. Hollenbeck, Judge.*

Mr. Earl Cooley, Mr. John N. Mabry, Mr. James E. Jewel, for plaintiff in error.

Mr. William L. Boatright, Attorney General, Mr. William W. Gaunt, Assistant, for the people.

*En Banc.*

Mr. Justice Adams

delivered the opinion of the court.

The defendant, a practicing physician, was convicted of second degree murder, hy procuring a criminal abortion, resulting in the death of the woman upon whom he operated. Defendant was sentenced to a term in the penitentiary, and brings the case here for review.

Counsel for defendant argue generally about the instructions. All instructions commonly used in the trial of criminal cases were voluntarily given by the trial *108judge. No objections were made to them; no other instructions were requested; there is no assignment of error based on the instructions as given, nor for failure to give others. The rights of the accused were fully protected, and there was no mistake in such instructions.

Counsel speak of the evidence. No error is assigned on the admission or rejection of evidence, nor have counsel pointed out any error. The preponderance of the evidence fully sustains the conviction.

Counsel claim that there was a variance of two days between the information and the proof, in that the charge was of an act committed on January 14,1926, but that the proof was January 12,1926. This was immaterial. *Laycock v.*People, 66 Colo. 441, 444, 182 Pac. 880.

Error is assigned because of the refusal of the trial court to grant a new trial. It does not appear that there was any abuse of discretion. In the absence of such showing, the ruling will not be interfered with. *Eachus v. People,*77 Colo. 445, 448, 236 Pac. 1009. Counsel for defendant have not cited any precedent for any proposition advanced.

This case has had the thorough consideration of every Justice of this court, and has been the subject of repeated conferences. Defendant’s present counsel did not represent him at the trial, and in their briefs they indiscriminately attack the trial judge, the district attorney and defendant’s trial attorney in general charges of improper conduct. The accusations are gratuitous and unwarranted. The defendant had a fair and impartial trial; the verdict was just, and the record shows no error.

Judgment affirmed.
### Part C—Electronic Product Radiation Control

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

This part was classified to subpart 3 (§263c et seq.) of part F of subchapter II of chapter 6A of Title 42, The Public Health and Welfare, prior to its renumbering by Pub. L. 101–629, §19(a)(4), Nov. 28, 1990, 104 Stat. 4530, as amended by Pub. L. 103–80, §4(a)(2), Aug. 13, 1993, 107 Stat. 779.
```

[Congressional Bills 114th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 3937 Referred in Senate (RFS)]

<DOC>
114th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 3937

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                           September 21, 2016

 Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Environment and 
                              Public Works

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
   To designate the building utilized as a United States courthouse 
   located at 150 Reade Circle in Greenville, North Carolina, as the 
              ``Randy D. Doub United States Courthouse''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. DESIGNATION.

    The building utilized as a United States courthouse located at 150 
Reade Circle in Greenville, North Carolina, shall be known and 
designated as the ``Randy D. Doub United States Courthouse'' during the 
period in which the building is utilized as a United States courthouse.

SEC. 2. REFERENCES.

    With respect to the period in which the building referred to in 
section 1 is utilized as a United States courthouse, any reference in a 
law, map, regulation, document, paper, or other record of the United 
States to that building shall be deemed to be a reference to the 
``Randy D. Doub United States Courthouse''.

            Passed the House of Representatives September 20, 2016.

            Attest:

                                                 KAREN L. HAAS,

                                                                 Clerk.
```
**Exhibit 32.2**

 

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

 

Inconnection with the Annual Report of Tennessee Commerce Bancorp, Inc. (the“Corporation”) on Form 10-K for the period ending December 31, 2008,as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”),I, Frank Perez, Chief Financial Officer of the Corporation, certify, pursuantto 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

(1)           The Report fully complies with therequirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities andExchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2)           The information contained in theReport fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition andresults of operations of the Corporation.

 
|   | /s/ Frank Perez                        |
|--------|----------------------------------------|
|   | Frank Perez                            |
|   | Chief Financial Officer                |
|   | Tennessee Commerce  Bancorp, Inc. |
|   | March 16, 2009                    |

 

----
FIL ED U.S. COURT OF APPEAL S EL EVENTHCI RCUI T J UNE 7, 2012 J OHN L EY CL ERK [DO N OT PUBLISH] IN THE UN ITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELE VENTH CIRCUIT

__ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ No. 1 1- 12 57 5 Non -Arg um en t Ca le nd ar

__ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ D.C. Dock etNo. 8 :1 0- cr-0 03 05 -VMC- AEP-1 UNITED STAT ES OF AMERIC A, Pl ai nt iff -Ap pe ll ee, ve rs us ROBERT EUGENE MARTIN, Defen da nt -Ap pe ll an t.

__ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ App eal fro m

th e Uni te d S ta te s Di st ric t Co urt forth e Mi dd le Dis tri ctof F lo rid a

__ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ (Jun e 7 , 20 12 ) Befo re BARKETT, PRYOR an d HILL, Ci rcu itJu dg es . PER CURI AM: Tho m as H. Ostr an de r, ap po in te d c ouns el forRo be rt Eu ge ne Mart ininth is di rectcri m in al ap pe al , has m ov edto withd raw fro m furth er re pr es en ta ti on of t he ap pe ll an t an d fi le d abri ef p ur su an t t o And er s v. C al if orni a , 38 6 U.S. 7 38 , 87 S.Ct .13 96 , 18 L.Ed.2d49 3 (1 96 7) . Our i nd ep en de ntrev ie w of the en ti re re co rdrev eal s

th atco un se l’s as se ss m en t o f th e rel at iv e m eri t o f th e ap pe al is co rrec t. Bec au se an in de pe nd en t ex am in at io n o f th e en ti re rec or d re ve al s n o a rg uabl e is su es of m eri t, co un se l’s m ot io n t o wi th dr aw is GRANTED , andMart in ’s con vi ct io ns an d se nt en ces are AFFIRMED .

2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

DAY HIGH

 19,696

 21,019

 20,861

 19,188

 19,202

 17,299

 16,465

 15,656

 15,907

 16,183

 16,351

 17,906

 19,222

 19,896

 18,796

 19,163

 19,404

 18,360

 18,583

 20,095

 22,236

 19,355

 18,490

 18,975

 19,042

 20,177

 21,271

 21,929

 22,247

 23,387

 7,094

 7,704

 7,573

 6,586

 6,676

 6,988

 7,046

 6,684

 7,711

 7,541

 7,651

 7,946

 8,473

 7,546

 3,062

 7,648

 6,936

 5,998

 6,616

 7,181

 8,175

 9,158

 8,913

 9,974

 9,973

 9,987

 9,233

 8,454

 8,751

 9,168

 13,221

 14,233

 14,099

 13,336

 13,429

 13,037

 12,764

 11,914

 12,290

 11,936

 12,291

 12,816

 13,787

 13,762

 11,896

 13,886

 13,501

 12,888

 13,421

 14,393

 15,193

 14,975

 14,686

 14,781

 15,020

 15,201

 15,233

 14,977

 15,489

 16,177

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

APRIL 2021 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: May 5, 2021

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

PORT CHICAGO BOTTOM IN SUISUN BAY
Exhibit 99.6
   J.P. MORGAN SECURITIES LLCBy:

/s/  Anwar M. ZakkourName:
    Anwar M. ZakkourTitle:
    Vice Chairman
§ 10.406 What are the maximum and minimum rates of compensation in disability cases? ( a ) Compensation for total or partial disability may not exceed 75 percent of the basic monthly pay of the highest step of grade 15 of the General Schedule. (Basic monthly pay does not include locality adjustments.) However, this limit does not apply to disability sustained in the performance of duty which was due to an assault which occurred during an attempted assassination of a Federal official described under 18 U.S.C. 351(a) or 1751(a).
( b ) Compensation for total disability may not be less than 75 percent of the basic monthly pay of the first step of grade 2 of the General Schedule or actual pay, whichever is less. (Basic monthly pay does not include locality adjustments.)
§ 1002.42 What rights does an employee have under USERRA if he or she is on layoff, on strike, or on a leave of absence? ( a ) If an employee is laid off with recall rights, on strike, or on a leave of absence, he or she is an employee for purposes of USERRA. If the employee is on layoff and begins service in the uniformed services, or is laid off while performing service, he or she may be entitled to reemployment on return if the employer would have recalled the employee to employment during the period of service. Similar principles apply if the employee is on strike or on a leave of absence from work when he or she begins a period of service in the uniformed services.
( b ) If the employee is sent a recall notice during a period of service in the uniformed services and cannot resume the position of employment because of the service, he or she still remains an employee for purposes of the Act. Therefore, if the employee is otherwise eligible, he or she is entitled to reemployment following the conclusion of the period of service even if he or she did not respond to the recall notice.
( c ) If the employee is laid off before or during service in the uniformed services, and the employer would not have recalled him or her during that period of service, the employee is not entitled to reemployment following the period of service simply because he or she is a covered employee. Reemployment rights under USERRA cannot put the employee in a better position than if he or she had remained in the civilian employment position.
###### Editorial Note on Part 28

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 28 appear by T.D. ATF-477, 67 FR 18087 through 18090, Apr. 15, 2002.

#### § 28.25 General.

The proprietor of a duly constituted manufacturing bonded warehouse, established in accordance with law and the regulations in 19 CFR chapter I, may withdraw distilled spirits or wine from any distilled spirits plant or bonded wine cellar, as the case may be, without payment of tax, for use in the manufacture of products for export, or for shipment in bond to Puerto Rico, or for use by foreign governments, organizations, and individuals, as authorized by 26 U.S.C. 5066, 5214(a)(6) and 5362; and 19 U.S.C. 1311. The proprietor of the manufacturing bonded warehouse shall furnish bond in accordance with the provisions of § 28.63 or § 28.64.

(Sec. 311, Tariff Act of 1930, 46 Stat. 691, as amended (19 U.S.C. 1311); sec. 201, Pub. L. 85-859, 72 Stat. 1362, as amended, 1380, as amended (26 U.S.C. 5214, 5362); sec. 3, Pub. L. 91-659, 84 Stat. 1965, as amended (26 U.S.C. 5066))

[T.D. ATF-88, 46 FR 39814, Aug. 5, 1981, as amended by T.D. TTB-8, 69 FR 3831, Jan. 27, 2004]
```

[Congressional Bills 114th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 371 Introduced in House (IH)]

114th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 371

   To amend the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act to permit 
insurers to offer catastrophic coverage plans to anyone, and for other 
                               purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            January 14, 2015

 Mr. Fortenberry introduced the following bill; which was referred to 
                  the Committee on Energy and Commerce

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
   To amend the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act to permit 
insurers to offer catastrophic coverage plans to anyone, and for other 
                               purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Care for All Act of 2015''.

SEC. 2. PERMITTING INSURERS TO OFFER CATASTROPHIC COVERAGE PLANS TO 
              ANYONE.

    (a) In General.--Section 1302(e) of the Patient Protection and 
Affordable Care Act (42 U.S.C. 18022(e)) is amended to read as follows:
    ``(e) Catastrophic Plan.--A health plan not providing a bronze, 
silver, gold, or platinum level of coverage shall be treated as meeting 
the requirements of subsection (d) with respect to any plan year if the 
plan provides--
            ``(1) except as provided in paragraph (2), the essential 
        health benefits determined under subsection (b), except that 
        the plan provides no benefits for any plan year until the 
        individual has incurred cost-sharing expenses in an amount 
        equal to the annual limitation in effect under subsection 
        (c)(1) for the plan year (except as provided for in section 
        2713); and
            ``(2) coverage for at least three primary care visits.''.
    (b) Conforming Amendment.--Section 1312(d)(3)(C) of the Patient 
Protection and Affordable Care Act (42 U.S.C. 18032(d)(3)(C)) is 
amended by striking ``, except that'' and all that follows through 
``section 1302(e)''.
    (c) Effective Date.--The amendments made by this section shall 
apply to coverage issued on or after the date of the enactment of this 
Act.
                                 <all>
```