alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
NO. 07-01-0448-CR

	IN THE COURT OF APPEALS

	FOR THE SEVENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

	AT AMARILLO

	PANEL D

	MAY 22, 2002

	______________________________

	LUREANER OULARE,

			Appellant

	v.

	STATE OF TEXAS, 

			Appellee

	_________________________________

	FROM THE COUNTY COURT AT LAW NO. 1 OF POTTER COUNTY COUNTY;

	NO. 95,498-1; HON. W.F. CORKY ROBERTS, PRESIDING

	_______________________________

Before BOYD, C.J., QUINN and REAVIS, J.J.

	Appellant Lureaner Oulare appeals her conviction of resisting arrest, search or transportation.  Her sole issue is identical to that raised in Lureaner Oulare v. State, No. 07-01-0404-CR, pending in this court.  We overrule it for the same reasons stated in our opinion issued this day in Lureaner  Oulare v. State, No. 07-01-0404-CR.  That is, appellant waived the issue.   

     Accordingly, the judgment of the trial court is affirmed. 

 								Brian Quinn 

                                        					   Justice

Do not publish.
```

[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 129 (Wednesday, July 6, 2011)]
[Notices]
[Page 39389]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2011-16958]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

CONSUMER PRODUCT SAFETY COMMISSION

Sunshine Act Meeting Notice

TIME AND DATE: Wednesday, July 13, 2011; 2 p.m.-3 p.m.

PLACE: Hearing Room 420, Bethesda Towers, 4330 East West Highway, 
Bethesda, Maryland.

STATUS: Closed to the Public.

Matter To Be Considered

Compliance Status Report

    The Commission staff will brief the Commission on the status of 
compliance matters.
    For a recorded message containing the latest agenda information, 
call (301) 504-7948.

CONTACT PERSON FOR MORE INFORMATION: Todd A. Stevenson, Office of the 
Secretary, U.S. Consumer Product Safety Commission, 4330 East West 
Highway, Bethesda, MD 20814, (301) 504-7923.

    Dated: July 1, 2011.
Todd A Stevenson,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2011-16958 Filed 7-1-11; 11:15 am]
BILLING CODE 6355-01-P
```
## COURT OF APPEALS

SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS

FORT WORTH

NO. 02-16-00108-CR

Timothy Edward Depaepe

v.

The State of Texas §

§

§

§

§ From 372nd District Court

of Tarrant Coun ty (1387145D)

June 16, 2016

Per Curiam

(nfp)



### JUDGMENT

This court has considered the record on appeal in this case and holds that

the appeal should be dismissed. It is ordered that the appeal is dismissed for

want of jurisdiction.

SECOND DISTRICT COURT OF APPEALS

PER CURIAM
AAM-12-256-E 

April 24, 2012 

 Exemption No. 10515 

 Regulatory Docket No. FAA-2012-0239 

Mr. William Zeffiro 

Substance Prevention/Abuse Program Manager 

Air Ventures Hawaii, LLC 

P.O. Box 3350 

Lihue, HI 96766 

Dear Mr. Zeffiro: 

This letter is to inform you that we have granted your request for exemption. It transmits our 

decision, explains its basis, and gives you the conditions and limitations of the exemption, 

including the date it ends. 

The Basis for Our Decision 

By letter dated March 20, 2012, you petitioned the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) on 

behalf of Air Ventures Hawaii, LLC (Air Ventures Hawaii), for an exemption from part 120 

of Title 14, Code of Federal Regulations (14 CFR). That exemption, if granted, would allow 

Air Ventures Hawaii, which is operating under separate parts of the regulations, to cover its 

safety-sensitive employees under one drug and alcohol testing program. 

The FAA has determined that good cause exists for not publishing a summary of the petition 

in the Federal Register because the requested exemption would not set a precedent, and any 

delay in acting on this petition would be detrimental to Air Ventures Hawaii. 

The FAA has issued a grant of exemption in circumstances similar in all material respects to 

those presented in your petition. In Grant of Exemption No. 9703 (copy enclosed), the FAA 

found that Solid Edge’s § 91.147 air tour operations were closely connected to its part 135 

operations. The FAA also found that combining the petitioner’s two testing programs into 

one would be in the public interest and would maintain an equivalent level of safety to that 

provided by the current regulations. Thus, the FAA concluded it was unnecessary to burden 

the petitioner by requiring it to conduct two separate testing programs. 
2 

Having reviewed your reasons for requesting an exemption, I find that— 

 they are similar in all material respects to relief previously requested in the enclosed Grant 

of Exemption No. 9703; 

 the reasons stated by the FAA for granting the enclosed Grant of Exemption No. 9703 

also apply to the situation you present; and 

 a grant of exemption is in the public interest. 

Our Decision 

Under the authority contained in 49 U.S.C. 40113 and 44701, which the FAA Administrator 

has delegated to me, I hereby grant Air Ventures Hawaii, LLC an exemption from 14 CFR 

part 120 to the extent necessary to allow Air Ventures Hawaii, which is operating under 

separate parts of the regulations, to cover its safety-sensitive employees under one testing 

program, subject to the conditions and limitations described below. 

Conditions and Limitations 

1. Employees of Air Ventures Hawaii are subject to the drug and alcohol regulations at 

all times while conducting operations under part 135 or part 91. 

 2. The drug and alcohol testing program must be implemented under the auspices of the 

Air Ventures Hawaii part 135 operation, not under part 91. 

This exemption terminates on April 30, 2014, unless sooner superseded or rescinded. 

Sincerely, 

/s/ 

James R. Fraser, M.D. 

Deputy Federal Air Surgeon 

Enclosure
Exhibit 8.1
 Jurisdiction ofName of Subsidiary
    
    Incorporation1. CEC Telecom Co., Ltd.
    
    PRC2. Beijing VEVA Technology Co., Ltd.
    
    PRC3. Strong Metropolitan Limited
    
    Hong Kong SAR4. Lightful Limited
    
    Hong Kong SAR
EXHIBIT 11b


                              AMERITECH CORPORATION
                 COMPUTATION OF FULLY DILUTED EARNINGS PER SHARE
                                        
                                        
                                            Three Months Ended
                                                   March 31
                                             -------------
                                          1997              1996
                                          ----              ----
Net income                           $536,138,000      $478,345,000
                                     ============      ============


Weighted average number of
shares outstanding                    550,526,956       554,751,737

Additional dilutive effect of
outstanding options (as determined
by the application of the treasury
stock method)                           2,611,404         3,034,266
                                     ------------      ------------

Weighted average shares outstanding
on which fully diluted earnings
per share are based                   553,138,360       557,786,003
                                     ============      ============
Fully diluted earnings per share            $0.97             $0.86
                                     ============      ============


This calculation is submitted in accordance with Regulation S-K, Item
601(b)11, although not required by footnote 2 to paragraph 14 of
Accounting Principles Board Opinion No. 15 because it results in dilution
of less than three percent.


Amounts for the prior year have been restated to reflect inclusion of the
windfall tax benefit when applying the treasury stock method to determine
the dilutive effect of outstanding options.
**Exhibit32(a)**

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 906**

**OF THESARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 (18 U.S.C.SECTION 1350)**

 

In connection with theQuarterly Report of PACCAR Financial Corp. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for thequarter ended September 30, 2007 as filed with the Securities and ExchangeCommission on the date hereof (the “Report”), the undersigned certify,  pursuant to section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. section 1350), that to the best of our knowledge and belief:

 

(1)   The Report fully complies withthe requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of1934; and

 

(2)   The information contained inthe Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial conditionand results of operations of the Company.

 
|   |             |   |   |                          |
|--------|------------------|--------|--------|-------------------------------|
| Date   | November 2, 2007 |   | By     |  /s/ Mark C. Pigott      |
|   |             |   |   | Mark C. Pigott                |
|   |             |   |   | Chairman                      |
|   |             |   |   | PACCAR Financial  Corp.       |
|   |             |   |   | (Principal Executive Officer) |
|   |             |   |   |                          |
|   |             |   |   |                          |
|   |             |   | By     | /s/ Michael A.  Tembreull     |
|   |             |   |   | Michael A.  Tembreull         |
|   |             |   |   | Vice Chairman                 |
|   |             |   |   | PACCAR Financial  Corp.       |
|   |             |   |   | (Principal Financial Officer) |

 

A signed original of thiswritten statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company andwill be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and ExchangeCommission or its staff upon request.

 

 

----
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY HIGH

 663

 5,159

 804

 426

 432

 677

 3,182

 508

 468

 1,054

 1,682

 1,463

 1,663

 2,628

 4,051

 2,749

 915

 320

 273

 261

 230

 239

 251

 232

 208

 277

 218

 322

 196

 235

 221

 272

 281

 280

 271

 259

 265

 265

 255

 247

 232

 231

 238

 246

 255

 267

 234

 244

 217

 219

 200

 184

 181

 177

 155

 165

 159

 163

 147

 171

 167

 179

 350

 1,066

 443

 333

 318

 334

 571

 296

 272

 319

 467

 450

 682

 1,284

 1,728

 1,251

 361

 266

 242

 229

 204

 201

 203

 183

 183

 187

 186

 185

 180

 180

 192

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

MARCH 2011 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: April 25, 2011

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

PORT CHICAGO TOP IN SUISUN BAY
#### § 404.1086 Community income.

If community property laws apply to income that an individual derives from a trade or business (other than a trade or business carried on by a partnership), the gross income and deductions attributable to such trade or business shall be treated as the gross income and deductions of the spouse carrying on such trade or business or, if such trade or business is jointly operated, treated as the gross income and deductions of each spouse on the basis of his or her respective distributive share of the gross income and deductions.

[70 FR 41955, July 21, 2005]
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

DAY HIGH

 829

 917

 891

 833

 806

 982

 1,049

 1,053

 1,059

 987

 994

 950

 1,276

 1,284

 1,121

 1,309

 1,215

 1,184

 1,152

 1,044

 942

 909

 797

 798

 791

 774

 738

 717

 685

 612

 634

 609

 517

 502

 518

 583

 558

 665

 590

 581

 661

 780

 766

 840

 849

 819

 709

 700

 692

 597

 567

 565

 588

 578

 577

 568

 759

 770

 741

 695

 649

 681

 720

 787

 768

 816

 775

 772

 891

 1,062

 894

 1,102

 1,077

 1,025

 858

 872

 828

 719

 682

 684

 697

 668

 658

 635

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

FEBRUARY 2015 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: March 4, 2015

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

DELTA MENDOTA CANAL AT CHECK 13 (O'NEILL)
###### Editorial Note on Part 479

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 479 appear by T.D. ATF-487, 68 FR 3752, Jan. 24, 2003.

#### § 479.92 Transportation of firearms to effect transfer.

Notwithstanding any provision of § 478.28 of this chapter, it shall not be required that authorization be obtained from the Director for the transportation in interstate or foreign commerce of a firearm in order to effect the transfer of a firearm authorized under the provisions of this subpart.

[T.D. ATF-270, 53 FR 10510, Mar. 31, 1988]
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

DAY HIGH

 944

 892

 854

 900

 937

 951

 950

 976

 989

 994

 964

 1,020

 1,026

 1,010

 973

 907

 861

 825

 813

 806

 736

 757

 728

 755

 767

 671

 629

 567

 512

 501

 491

 480

 469

 460

 447

 435

 421

 412

 402

 391

 403

 397

 397

 384

 377

 378

 376

 381

 380

 383

 388

 388

 389

 391

 406

 403

 675

 675

 668

 679

 661

 646

 636

 623

 667

 603

 587

 572

 596

 644

 612

 623

 615

 556

 541

 534

 509

 535

 538

 544

 578

 488

 472

 468

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

FEBRUARY 2001 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: March 13, 2001

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

DELTA MENDOTA CANAL AT CHECK 13 (O'NEILL)
#### § 771.41 Denial of renewal application or revocation of license or permit.

If, following the opportunity for compliance under § 555.71 of this chapter, or without opportunity for compliance under § 555.71 of this chapter as circumstances warrant, the Director of Industry Operations finds that the licensee or permittee is not likely to comply with applicable laws or regulations in this part or is otherwise not eligible to continue operations authorized under his license or permit, the Director of Industry Operations shall issue a notice of denial of the renewal application or revocation of the license or permit, ATF F 5400.11 (Notice of Denial of Application for License or Permit) or ATF Form 5400.10 (Notice of Revocation of License or Permit) (F 5400.10), as appropriate. The notice will set forth the matters of fact constituting the violations specified, dates, places, and the sections of law and regulations violated. In the case of the revocation of a license or permit, the notice will specify the date on which the action is effective, which date will be on or after the date the notice is served on the licensee or permittee. The notice will also advise the licensee or permittee that he may, within 15 days after receipt of the notice, request a hearing and, if applicable, a stay of the effective date of the revocation of his license or permit.
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Frank Irwin, Appellant.

Present—Close, P. J., Hagarty, Carswell and Johnston, JJ.; Adel, J., not voting.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

DAY ELEV

 222.70

 222.42

 221.95

 222.35

 220.99

 220.47

 220.83

 222.10

 222.51

 221.30

 221.00

 220.30

 220.40

 221.11

 221.82

 221.55

 220.47

 219.23

 220.02

 222.11

 219.10

 221.27

 220.90

 220.49

 220.05

 219.62

 220.10

 220.09

 220.77

 220.87

 50,246

 49,501

 48,255

 49,314

 45,734

 44,374

 45,315

 48,650

 49,740

 46,547

 45,760

 43,931

 44,192

 46,049

 47,914

 47,204

 44,374

 41,170

 43,204

 48,677

 40,839

 46,469

 45,498

 44,427

 43,282

 42,170

 43,411

 43,386

 45,158

 45,420

STORAGE

+1,463

-745

-1,246

+1,059

-3,580

-1,360

+941

+3,335

+1,090

-3,193

-787

-1,829

+261

+1,857

+1,865

-710

-2,830

-3,204

+2,034

+5,473

-7,838

+5,630

-971

-1,071

-1,145

-1,112

+1,241

-25

+1,772

+262

CHANGE

1,682

1,448

1,307

1,277

1,326

1,491

1,720

1,548

1,500

1,632

1,701

1,654

1,631

1,613

900

0

305

1,102

1,163

1,282

1,396

1,263

1,146

1,102

1,133

1,108

1,257

1,341

1,369

1,276

PUMPING

 6,323

 6,224

 5,748

 5,294

 6,895

 7,574

 5,382

 5,332

 5,105

 5,118

 5,166

 4,867

 4,974

 5,100

 4,396

 4,394

 4,366

 5,045

 4,772

 4,692

 5,222

 3,772

 4,170

 4,390

 4,910

 4,932

 5,073

 4,518

 4,811

 4,288

PUMPING

 2,435

 2,707

 3,431

 4,048

 3,509

 1,623

 3,155

 1,893

 2,612

 4,463

 4,123

 4,359

 3,529

 2,498

 2,408

 2,676

 3,733

 4,259

 2,729

 533

 6,703

 1,504

 4,050

 3,352

 2,375

 2,374

 1,407

 2,110

 967

 1,583

PUMPING

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

GEN.

*

+523

-38

+944

+530

+940

+843

+825

+842

+592

+242

+481

+422

+895

+380

+566

+330

+435

+507

+755

+381

+496

+407

+385

+429

+628

+477

+531

+268

+401

+299

OR

UNITED STATES 

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION

CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT

CONSOLIDATED STATE-FEDERAL O'NEILL FOREBAY October 3, 2003

DAILY OPERATIONS

SEPTEMBER 2003 RUN DATE:

IN LAKE GEN.

ACRE-FEET O'NEILL

RELEASE - C.F.S. 

TOTALS -3,363 38,673 0 87,148 152,853 +15,716

ACRE-FEET -3,363 76,708 0 172,858 303,184

SUMMARY

 0

RELEASE (ACRE-FEET)

O'NEILL GEN. 0

SAN LUIS PUMP 172,858 0

 48,783

DOS AMIGOS PUMP 303,184

DELIVERIES 

S. LUIS O'NEILL

 1,080

 1,075

 0

 1,874

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 96

 222

 150

 150

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 4,647

 9,217

CALIF. DOS AMIGOS

AQUEDUCT

6,210

6,070

6,300

6,195

6,333

6,177

6,466

6,516

6,174

6,097

6,710

6,228

6,108

6,540

6,278

6,286

5,711

5,929

6,458

6,322

6,082

6,444

6,199

5,672

4,946

5,159

5,317

5,007

4,901

4,427

 179,262

 355,566

S. LUIS

DELIV.

GAINS(+)

LOSS(-)

C.F.S.

INFLOW - C.F.S

STATE OF CALIFORNIA

THE RESOURCES AGENCY

DEPARTMENT OF WATER RESOURCES

STATE WATER PROJECT

TOTAL 476,042

 31,173

* DAILY DEL. FIGURES UNAVAILABLE. TOT. DEL. IS INCLUDED IN COMPUTING MONTHLY TOTALS 

Table 18
Exhibit 23.1
   /s/
Electrical Conductivity, UMHOS

Day High Low Mean

1 0 0 0

2 0 0 0

3 0 0 0

4 0 0 0

5 0 0 0

6 0 0 0

7 0 0 0

8 0 0 0

9 0 0 0

10 0 0 0

11 0 0 0

12 0 0 0

13 0 0 0

14 0 0 0

15 0 0 0

16 0 0 0

17 0 0 0

18 0 0 0

19 0 0 0

20 0 0 0

21 0 0 0

22 0 0 0

23 0 0 0

24 0 0 0

25 0 0 0

26 0 0 0

27 0 0 0

28 0 0 0

29 0 0 0

30 0 0 0

31 0 0 0

COMMENT(S):

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

Historical Archive and Report Database

Pittsburg Bottom On The Sacramento River

Period: October 2023 Run Date: 11/8/2023
[DO NOT PUBLISH]

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT

________________________

No. 16-15388

Non-Argument Calendar

________________________

D.C. Docket No. 2:10-cr-00010-JES-MRM-1

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 

 Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

SEBASTIAN ANDRES-MANUEL, 

 Defendant-Appellant.

________________________

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Middle District of Florida

________________________

(April 20, 2017)

Before MARCUS, JORDAN and JILL PRYOR, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: 

Case: 16-15388 Date Filed: 04/20/2017 Page: 1 of 2 
2

Keith W. Upson, appointed counsel for Sebastian Andres-Manuel in this 

direct criminal appeal, has moved to withdraw from further representation of the 

appellant and filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S. Ct. 

1396, 18 L. Ed. 2d 493 (1967). Our independent review of the entire record 

reveals that counsel=s assessment of the relative merit of Andres-Manuel’s appeal 

is correct. Because independent examination of the entire record reveals no 

arguable issues of merit, counsel=s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and 

Andres-Manuel’s conviction and sentence is AFFIRMED.

Case: 16-15388 Date Filed: 04/20/2017 Page: 2 of 2
SCHEDULE 14A INFORMATION
 x
 o
  o
 o
 o
 o
 x
 SERVIDYNE, INC.
 
  N/A
 
   x
    
    No fee required.o
    
    Fee computed on table below per Exchange Act Rules 14a-6(i)(1) and 0-11.(1)
    
    Title of each class of securities to which transaction applies:N/A(2)
    
    Aggregate number of class of securities to which transaction applies:N/A(3)
    
    Per unit price or other underlying value of transaction computed pursuant to
Exchange Act Rule 0-11 (set forth the amount on which the filing fee is calculated and
state how it was determined):(4)
    
    Proposed maximum aggregate value of transaction:(5)
    
    Total fee paid:o
    
    Fee paid previously with preliminary materials.o
    
    Check box if any part of the fee is offset as provided by Exchange Act Rule 0-11(a)(2) and
identify the filing for which the offsetting fees was paid previously. Identify the previous
filing by registration statement number or the Form or Schedule and the date of its filing.(1)
    
    Amount Previously Paid: N/A(2)
    
    Form, Schedule or Registration Statement No.: N/A(3)
    
    Filing Party: N/A(4)
    
    Date Filed: N/A




---



##### 



[Excerpt from Servidyne Newsletter]
 Click Here
   Five Hurdles to Broadening
Demand Response Programs (And How to Overcome Them)




---



##### 



ADDITIONAL INFORMATION ON THE MERGER AND WHERE TO FIND IT
 Servidyne shareholders are urged to read the proxy
statement when it becomes available, as well as other documents filed with the SEC, because they
will contain important information about the merger www.sec.gov ) www.servidyne.com investorrelations@servidyne.com
  CAUTIONARY NOTE ABOUT FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS

    
    Registration Statement (Form S-8 No. 33-46536) pertaining to the AnchorBank, fsb Retirement
Plan; and,
    
    Registration Statement (Form S-8 No. 333-122970) pertaining to the 2004 Equity Incentive
Plan.
### §142. Milk or cream when unfit for importation

Milk or cream shall be considered unfit for importation (1) when all cows producing such milk or cream are not healthy and a physical examination of all such cows has not been made within one year previous to such milk being offered for importation; (2) when such milk or cream, if raw, is not produced from cows which have passed a tuberculin test applied by a duly authorized official veterinarian of the United States, or of the country in which such milk or cream is produced, within one year previous to the time of the importation, showing that such cows are free from tuberculosis; (3) when the sanitary conditions of the dairy farm or plant in which such milk or cream is produced or handled do not score at least fifty points out of one hundred points according to the methods for scoring as provided by the score cards used by the Bureau of Dairy Industry of the United States Department of Agriculture at the time such dairy farms or plants are scored; (4) in the case of raw milk if the number of bacteria per cubic centimeter exceeds three hundred thousand and in the case of raw cream seven hundred and fifty thousand, in the case of pasteurized milk if the number of bacteria per cubic centimeter exceeds one hundred thousand, and in the case of pasteurized cream five hundred thousand; (5) when the temperature of milk or cream at the time of importation exceeds fifty degrees Fahrenheit.

(Feb. 15, 1927, ch. 155, §2, 44 Stat. 1101.)

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Transfer of Functions

Agricultural Research Service became the successor to functions of Bureau of Dairy Industry under Secretary of Agriculture's Memorandum 1320, Supplement 4, Nov. 2, 1953.