alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
### THEAYTORNEY GENERAL OFTEXAS

Honorable T.'M. Trimble FirstAssIstant State Superintendent Austin, Texas
Dear Sir: OpinionNo. O-3764.. .,,, .__ Re: Whether scholastic enrollment' may be~transferred 'withoutdonsent bf board of trustees of sending district. In,gour letter of July 14,,1941,you direct our at--. tention toSection 1 of Article , House Bill 281(,47th Legislature, (JZquallzation Law, 1941-43), reading as follows:
"For the schoolyear 1941-42,upon the agreement of the Board of Trustees of the dlstricts concerned or on petition si.gned by a ibajo~ltg

of the qualifiedvoters of the district and subject to the approval of the County Superintendent,State Superintendent,and Joint LegislativeAdvisory Committee, the trusteesofa districtwhich magbe unable to maintain a satisfactory schoolmay transfer its entire scholastic enrollment, or any number of grades thereof, to a convenient school of higher rank, and in such event,'all of the funds of the district, including the State Aid to which the district would otherwise be entitledunder the provisions ofthi. Act, or such proportionatepart thereof ss may be necessary shall be used In carrying.out said agreement;provided that no ald shall be allowed for teachers that are not actually employed in the contracting schools."
You request our opinion In response to the following questions: "Under the provisions of the Equallzatlon I&w referred to above, may the majority of the qualified voters of a schooldistrict enter Into a contractwith another schooldistrict to teach their students, even though the majority of theBoard of Trustees of the school d'istrlct to be contracted object to making the transfer?Honorable T. M. Trimble, page 2 o-3764

"Ifthe majority of the qualified voters of the district have the authority to contract their schoolwith an adjoln,lng district how may the funds of th,esendingdistrict be transferred to the receivingdistrict over the protest and without'the signature of the'Board'ofTrustees of the sendingdistrict,who have refused to sign the contract?" ;

_ We answer your firstquestion in the negative. Under the quoted terms of the Act, the board of trustiies of the sendingdistrltitIs 'the body“which is clothedwith authority to malcethe ultimate transfer, and.its action ls~indispenslble. We"are sendingyou a copy of our Opinion No. O-3814 concerning a similar question.

.

This rendersunnecessary an answer to your second question.
Yours very truly ATTORNEY GENERAL OF TFXAS

By ,s/Glenn

R. Lewis Glenn R. Lewis Assistant GRL:db:wc

APPROVEDAUG 7, 1941 s/Grover Sellers FIRST ASSISTANT ATTORNRYGRNRRAL Approved Opinion CommitteeBy s/BG Chairman
Exhibit 32.2

Certification by the Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to
18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, I, the undersigned Chief Financial Officer of Genzyme Corporation (the "Company"), hereby
certify that the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the quarter ended March 31, 2009 (the "Report") fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.

|                                                                         |  | 
|------------------------------------------------------------------------ |  | 
|/s/ MICHAEL S. WYZGA Michael S. Wyzga Chief Financial OfficerMay 8, 2009 |  | 

---



QuickLinks
### §377. Revision of United States Pharmacopoeia; development of analysis and mechanical and physical tests

The Secretary, in carrying into effect the provisions of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act [21 U.S.C. 301 et seq.], is authorized on and after July 12, 1943, to cooperate with associations and scientific societies in the revision of the United States Pharmacopoeia and in the development of methods of analysis and mechanical and physical tests necessary to carry out the work of the Food and Drug Administration.

(July 12, 1943, ch. 221, title II, 57 Stat. 500; 1953 Reorg. Plan No. 1, §5, eff. Apr. 11, 1953, 18 F.R. 2053, 67 Stat. 631.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

The Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act, referred to in text, is act June 25, 1938, ch. 675, 52 Stat. 1040, which is classified generally to this chapter. For complete classification of this Act to the Code, see section 301 of this title and Tables.

#### Codification

Section was enacted as part of the Labor-Federal Security Appropriation Act, 1944, and not as part of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act which comprises this chapter.

#### **Executive Documents**

#### Transfer of Functions

For transfer of functions of Federal Security Administrator to Secretary of Health, Education, and Welfare [now Health and Human Services], and of Food and Drug Administration in the Department of Agriculture to Federal Security Agency, see notes set out under section 321 of this title.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
<CURRENCY> U.S. DOLLARS
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1997
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                1.00000
<CASH>                                          38,131
<SECURITIES>                                    37,862
<RECEIVABLES>                                   59,211
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                     22,358
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               168,568
<PP&E>                                         241,034
<DEPRECIATION>                                (80,070)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 563,359
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          129,835
<BONDS>                                        151,815
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         2,515
<OTHER-SE>                                     168,568
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   563,359
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               150,141
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  134,235
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                              (12,708)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               4,527
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 24,087
<INCOME-TAX>                                    11,803
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    12,284
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    0.490
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    0.480
        

</TABLE>
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

DAY HIGH

 16,292

 16,700

 16,662

 17,034

 17,434

 17,881

 18,570

 18,147

 19,082

 19,797

 18,986

 18,448

 17,818

 18,144

 18,309

 18,758

 19,615

 19,975

 20,191

 21,146

 21,991

 22,103

 21,893

 21,415

 20,630

 19,226

 18,888

 18,447

 18,956

 15,981

 8,240

 8,501

 8,636

 9,235

 9,861

 8,046

 9,690

 9,551

 9,058

 9,363

 10,057

 9,398

 8,983

 8,745

 9,567

 9,986

 11,655

 12,275

 12,993

 12,952

 13,332

 12,432

 12,039

 10,806

 10,197

 9,356

 8,776

 8,746

 9,469

 9,132

 12,896

 12,964

 12,943

 13,123

 13,374

 13,306

 13,910

 13,405

 14,111

 14,736

 14,859

 14,386

 14,212

 14,318

 14,669

 15,299

 15,814

 15,969

 16,101

 16,601

 17,280

 17,253

 16,700

 16,025

 15,151

 14,141

 13,937

 13,953

 15,194

 12,178

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

NOVEMBER 2018 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: December 10, 2018

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

PITTSBURG BOTTOM ON THE SACRAMENTO RIVER
#### § 216.72 What is required for payment of a child's annuity.

An eligible child of a deceased employee is entitled to an annuity upon applying therefor and submitting any evidence requested by the Board.

(Approved by the Office of Management and Budget under control number 3220-0030)
Electrical Conductivity, UMHOS

Day High Low Mean

1 3,575 488 1,654

2 3,422 260 1,356

3 2,443 255 811

4 6,859 303 3,376

5 7,900 529 3,787

6 5,274 328 2,416

7 3,544 270 1,112

8 921 236 403

9 507 226 311

10 318 221 259

11 270 219 242

12 257 213 234

13 260 206 228

14 267 203 226

15 249 202 216

16 243 204 214

17 250 207 219

18 496 207 260

19 1,890 205 554

20 301 211 244

21 252 214 229

22 239 214 224

23 235 202 218

24 219 199 208

25 221 197 208

26 213 186 199

27 202 181 188

28 193 180 185

29 196 171 181

COMMENT(S): 0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

Historical Archive and Report Database

Port Chicago Top In Suisun Bay 

Run Date: 3/17/2024

February 2024
<TABLE> <S> <C>

  <ARTICLE> 5
  <LEGEND>
   THE SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM
   FINANCIAL STATEMENTS  OF THE REGISTRANT FOR THE THREE MONTH PERIOD ENDING
   JULY 31, 1997 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH
   FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
  </LEGEND>
         
  <S>                             <C>
  <PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
  <FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          APR-30-1998
  <PERIOD-END>                               JUL-31-1997
  <CASH>                                             821
  <SECURITIES>                                         0
  <RECEIVABLES>                                        0
  <ALLOWANCES>                                         0
  <INVENTORY>                                     25,323
  <CURRENT-ASSETS>                                35,614
  <PP&E>                                         650,805
  <DEPRECIATION>                                (102,737)
  <TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 596,407
  <CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          529,091
  <BONDS>                                              0
  <COMMON>                                     2,088,001
  <PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
  <PREFERRED>                                          0
  <OTHER-SE>                                  (2,024,030)
  <TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   596,407
  <SALES>                                              0
  <TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0
  <CGS>                                                0
  <TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
  <OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
  <LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
  <INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
  <INCOME-PRETAX>                                 (7,119)
  <INCOME-TAX>                                         0
  <INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
  <DISCONTINUED>                                       0           
  <EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
  <CHANGES>                                            0
  <NET-INCOME>                                    (7,119)
  <EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.001)
  <EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.001)
          
  
</TABLE>
#### §§ 6.46-6.47 [Reserved]
(No. 6748

#### Stromberg Datagraphix, Inc., Claimant, *vs.*State of Illinois, Secretary of State, Respondent.

*Opinion filed August 10, 1972.*

Stromberg Datagraphix, Inc., Claimant, pro se.

William J. Scott, Attorney General; William E. Webber, Assistant Attorney General, for Respondent.

Berlin, C.J.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY HIGH

 24,378

 24,649

 25,413

 24,690

 22,518

 20,732

 21,186

 22,106

 23,818

 24,424

 23,818

 24,641

 25,197

 26,707

 28,144

 28,877

 30,175

 30,252

 28,825

 26,788

 25,621

 25,917

 26,644

 28,215

 28,775

 29,011

 29,239

 29,093

 29,258

 30,064

 30,606

 11,685

 11,935

 12,508

 12,254

 12,817

 12,311

 12,841

 10,949

 14,082

 14,388

 13,150

 13,385

 13,716

 14,467

 14,977

 15,995

 16,441

 16,123

 15,906

 15,591

 16,007

 16,867

 16,537

 18,354

 17,942

 17,292

 17,135

 16,634

 16,751

 17,444

 17,512

 17,638

 17,992

 18,626

 18,424

 18,089

 17,400

 17,534

 17,280

 18,603

 18,430

 17,786

 18,773

 19,651

 20,351

 21,526

 21,991

 22,899

 23,082

 22,448

 21,704

 21,627

 21,503

 21,414

 22,474

 22,589

 22,852

 22,917

 22,763

 23,044

 23,534

 23,413

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

MAY 2014 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: June 6, 2014

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

PORT CHICAGO BOTTOM IN SUISUN BAY
§ 30.15 May EEOICPA benefits be assigned, transferred or garnished? ( a ) Pursuant to section 7385f(a) of the Act, no claim for EEOICPA benefits may be assigned or transferred.
( b ) Provisions of the Social Security Act (42 U.S.C. 659) and regulations issued by the Office of Personnel Management at 5 CFR part 581 permit the garnishment of payments of EEOICPA monetary benefits to collect overdue alimony and child support. A request to garnish a payment for either of these purposes should be submitted to the district office that is handling the EEOICPA claim, and must be accompanied by a copy of the pertinent state agency or court order.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY ELEV

 582.80

 582.63

 583.06

 582.92

 583.35

 582.98

 582.10

 581.56

 581.22

 581.45

 581.20

 580.99

 581.91

 582.97

 583.80

 583.65

 583.67

 583.96

 586.03

 583.31

 582.91

 582.59

 582.19

 581.59

 581.78

 581.52

 579.73

 581.12

 580.02

 582.06

 582.37

 21,164

 21,062

 21,319

 21,235

 21,495

 21,271

 20,746

 20,428

 20,229

 20,364

 20,217

 20,094

 20,633

 21,265

 21,769

 21,678

 21,690

 21,866

 23,154

 21,471

 21,229

 21,038

 20,799

 20,446

 20,557

 20,405

 19,372

 20,170

 19,536

 20,722

 20,907

STORAGE

-307

-102

+257

-84

+260

-224

-525

-318

-199

+135

-147

-123

+539

+632

+504

-91

+12

+176

+1,288

-1,683

-242

-191

-239

-353

+111

-152

-1,033

+798

-634

+1,186

+185

CHANGE

3,110

3,210

3,376

3,204

3,373

3,130

2,982

3,080

3,140

3,316

3,170

3,186

3,515

3,554

3,478

3,179

3,237

3,308

3,874

2,405

3,142

3,168

3,147

3,081

3,319

3,189

2,742

3,654

2,939

3,854

3,354

INFLOW

 3,263

 3,260

 3,243

 3,244

 3,240

 3,241

 3,245

 3,237

 3,237

 3,244

 3,242

 3,245

 3,240

 3,233

 3,221

 3,224

 3,230

 3,217

 3,221

 3,252

 3,263

 3,261

 3,264

 3,256

 3,260

 3,261

 3,259

 3,252

 3,258

 3,252

 3,259

POWER

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

SPILL

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

FISHTRAP

 2

 1

 3

 2

 2

 2

 2

 3

 3

 4

 2

 3

 3

 2

 3

 1

 1

 2

 4

 2

 1

 3

 3

 3

 3

 5

 4

 0

 1

 4

 2

C.F.S.

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

MARCH 2022 KESWICK RESERVOIR DAILY OPERATIONS RUN DATE: April 1, 2022

RES.

EVAP

C.F.S.

COMPUTED*

ACRE-FEET

RELEASE - C.F.S. 

TOTALS -564 100,416 100,624 0 0 76

ACRE-FEET -564 199,175 199,588 0 0 151

SUMMARY

RELEASE (ACRE-FEET)

POWER 199,588

SPILL 0

 21,471

FISH TRAP 0

SPRING

CR. P. P.

RELEASE (1)

 47

 119

 75

 74

 75

 75

 75

 75

 74

 74

 74

 74

 74

 74

 74

 74

 79

 73

 73

 73

 62

 49

 75

 86

 74

 75

 75

 75

 74

 75

 75

 2,300

 4,562

*COMPUTED INFLOW IS SUM OF CHANGE IN STORAGE, RELEASES, AND EVAPORATION.

(1) EVAPORATION RECORDS TAKEN FROM SHASTA PAN.

SHASTA

RELEASE

C.F.S

 2,796

 2,732

 3,129

 2,903

 3,151

 2,847

 2,696

 2,837

 2,921

 3,100

 2,952

 2,903

 3,249

 3,200

 3,126

 2,905

 2,929

 3,035

 3,561

 2,232

 2,880

 2,994

 2,888

 2,850

 3,079

 2,908

 2,524

 3,379

 2,687

 3,579

 3,110

 92,082

 182,645
### §§1118 to 1120. Omitted

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section 1118, Pub. L. 92–255, title II, §208, as added Pub. L. 94–237, §4(b), Mar. 19, 1976, 90 Stat. 243, which related to giving of notice to Director prior to initiation of a section 811(a) proceeding, was omitted in the general revision of title II of Pub. L. 92–255 by Pub. L. 96–181, §4, Jan. 2, 1980, 93 Stat. 1309. See section 1115 of this title.

A prior section 1118, Pub. L. 92–255, title II, §208, Mar. 21, 1972, 86 Stat. 68, which provided for acceptance of uncompensated services by Director, was repealed by Pub. L. 92–255, title I, §104, Mar. 21, 1972, 86 Stat. 67, eff. June 30, 1975.

Section 1119, Pub. L. 92–255, title II, §210, as added Pub. L. 94–237, §4(b), Mar. 19, 1976, 90 Stat. 243, which related to effect of this subchapter on statutory requirements and authorities, was omitted in the general revision of title II of Pub. L. 92–255 by Pub. L. 96–181, §4, Jan. 2, 1980, 93 Stat. 1309. See section 1116 of this title.

A prior section 1119, Pub. L. 92–255, title II, §209, Mar. 21, 1972, 86 Stat. 68, which provided for notice by Attorney General to Director with respect to control of dangerous drugs, was repealed by Pub. L. 92–255, title I, §104, Mar. 21, 1972, 86 Stat. 67, eff. June 30, 1975.

A prior section 210 of Pub. L. 92–255, title II, Mar. 21, 1972, 86 Stat. 69, which provided for authority of Director to make grants and enter into contract, was repealed by Pub. L. 92–255, title I, §104, Mar. 21, 1972, 86 Stat. 67, eff. June 30, 1975.

Section 1120, Pub. L. 92–255, title II, §211, as added Pub. L. 94–237, §4(b), Mar. 19, 1976, 90 Stat. 243, which related to authorization of appropriations with regard to this subchapter, was omitted in the general revision of title II of Pub. L. 92–255 by Pub. L. 96–181, §4, Jan. 2, 1980, 93 Stat. 1309.

A prior section 1120, Pub. L. 92–255, title II, §210, Mar. 21, 1972, 86 Stat. 69, which provided for authority of Director to make grants and enter into contracts, was repealed by Pub. L. 92–255, title I, §104, Mar. 21, 1972, 86 Stat. 67, eff. June 30, 1975.

A prior section 211 of Pub. L. 92–255, title II, Mar. 21, 1972, 86 Stat. 69, which provided for appointment of an acting Director until position was initially filled, was repealed by Pub. L. 92–255, title I, §104, Mar. 21, 1972, 86 Stat. 67, eff. June 30, 1975.
I 

114TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 3891 

To amend the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 to exempt issuers with a total 

market capitalization of less than $2,000,000,000 from the auditor attestation requirement for internal control assessments. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

NOVEMBER 3, 2015 

Mr. CLAWSON of Florida introduced the following bill; which was referred to 

the Committee on Financial Services 

A BILL 

To amend the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 to exempt issuers 

with a total market capitalization of less than 

$2,000,000,000 from the auditor attestation requirement 

for internal control assessments. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Get Regulation Out 

5 of the Way Act of 2015’’ or the ‘‘GROW Act of 2015’’. 


tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 3891 IH

1 SEC. 2. ADDITIONAL EXEMPTION FROM AUDITOR ATTESTA2 TION TO INTERNAL CONTROL ASSESSMENTS. 

3 Section 404(c) of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (15 

4 U.S.C. 7262(c)) is amended— 

5 (1) by striking the period at the end and insert6 ing ‘‘; or’’; 

7 (2) by striking ‘‘prepared for an issuer’’ and in8 serting the following: ‘‘prepared for— 

9 ‘‘(1) an issuer’’; and 

10 (3) by adding at the end the following: 

11 ‘‘(2) an issuer that, as of the first day of the 

12 fiscal year to which the assessment described in such 

13 subsection relates, has a total market capitalization 

14 of less than $2,000,000,000.’’. 

Æ 


tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
§ 302.6 Publication requirements. ( a ) *Publication of base year compensation requirement.* On or before December 1 of each year, the Railroad Retirement Board will compute the amount of base year compensation that an employee must have during the following calendar year in order to be a qualified employee on the basis of such compensation. Within 10 days of such computation, the Board will publish a notice in the Federal Register of the amount so computed and will notify each employer of that amount. Information as to such qualifying amount may also be obtained from any district or regional office of the Railroad Retirement Board or from the Bureau of Unemployment and Sickness Insurance.
( b ) *Notices.* The Board will provide employers with notices of their employees' rights to benefits under the Railroad Unemployment Insurance Act. The Board will arrange with employers to post such notices in such numbers and in such places as may be necessary to ensure that they will be seen by the greatest number of employees.
#### John M. Bruce, Respondent, *v.*Wellington A. Carter, Appellant.

(Argued February 12, 1878;

decided February 22, 1878.)

This action was brought against defendant, as indorser of two promissory notes made by one ICelley. The notes were *617given under and in pursuance of a stipulation for the settlement of two suits—one in the Superior Court of New York and one in the Supreme Court; the latter was against Kelley, the defendant and others. By the stipulation, the defendants, among other things, agreed to pay plaintiffs $6,000, by notes payable at times specified. Plaintiffs agreed that upon payment of $3,000 the suits in the Superior Court should be discontinued, and that each of the plaintiffs should execute to defendants a release under seal, releasing the defendants in both of the actions from all claims and demands because of the matters set forth in the complaints; the release, however, not to become operative until all the notes were paid. When all the notes were paid, then the action in the Supreme Court was to be discontinued. The notes in suit were the last two notes given under the stipulation.

The defense was that the discontinuance of the suits in the Superior Court and the release were conditions precedent to the payment of the notes, and that, as they had not been executed, plaintiffs could not recover. Held, untenable; that as the notes were to be and were made payable, absolutely at a time specified, and were not made dependent upon any condition, the case was one of mutual but independent promises.

*Geo. P. Avery*for appellant.

*Edward M. Shephard*for respondent.

Rapallo, J.,

reads for affirmance.

All concur.

Judgment affirmed.
### §7903. Privacy of assessment results

Any results from an individual assessment referred to in this chapter of a student that become part of the education records of the student shall have the protections provided in section 1232g of this title.

(Pub. L. 89–10, title VIII, §8523, formerly title IX, §9523, as added Pub. L. 107–110, title IX, §901, Jan. 8, 2002, 115 Stat. 1980; renumbered title VIII, §8523, Pub. L. 114–95, title VIII, §8001(a)(6), Dec. 10, 2015, 129 Stat. 2088, 2089.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Prior Provisions

A prior section 7903, Pub. L. 89–10, title IX, §9203, as added Pub. L. 103–382, title I, §101, Oct. 20, 1994, 108 Stat. 3798, set forth purpose of provisions relating to Native Hawaiian educational programs, prior to the general amendment of former subchapter IX of this chapter by Pub. L. 107–110.