alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
493 P.2d 981

#### Velda HOLCOMB and Virgil Holcomb, Plaintiffs-Appellees, v. William POWER, Jr., Defendant-Appellant. Dona SUTTON and R. H. Sutton, Plaintiffs-Appellees, v. William POWER, Jr., Defendant-Appellant.

No. 734.

Court of Appeals of New Mexico.

Dec. 22, 1971.

Rehearing Denied Jan. 12, 1972.

Certiorari Denied Deb. 9, 1972.

*497Daniel C. Lili, LeRoi Farlow, Albuquerque, for appellant.

Benjamin Eastburn, James L. Brown, Farmington, for appellee.

OPINION

SUTIN, Judge.

This is an appeal from a summary judgment in favor of plaintiffs on the issue of liability growing out of an automobile accident.

We reverse.

On July 25, 1968, at about 11:30 p. m., Power left the Boon Docks bar, about seven miles east of Farmington, and began to drive westward toward Farmington on State Road 17. Mrs. Holcomb and Mrs. Sutton left the bar and followed Power in a Chevrolet pickup driven by Mrs. Sutton. State Road 17 is a four-lane, divided highway with thirteen foot wide lanes, constructed of asphalt. About halfway between the Boon Docks bar and Farming-ton, Mrs. Sutton passed Power and resumed travel in the right-hand lane. As she was coming into a curve in the road, she and Mrs. Holcomb were just talking, and all of a sudden the accident happened. All that Mrs. Sutton remembered was that something struck her pickup. She did not know what caused the accident.

Power was in the left-hand passing lane at the time of the accident, and testified that Mrs. Sutton “had to be on the right-hand side lane or part way on the right-hand lane.” He knew the accident occurred because he was in the ditch on the right-hand side of the road behind the Sutton pickup. Mrs. Sutton’s pickup left a total of 195 feet of skid marks on her side of the road.

“Where the *slightest doubt*exists as to the material facts summary judgment should not be granted.” Binns v. Schoenbrun, 81 N.M. 489, 468 P.2d 890 (Ct.App. 1970). [Emphasis added.] Trial courts should not forget that “[t]he summary judgment statute is drastic and its purpose is not to substitute for existing methods in the trial of issues of fact.” Zengerle v. Commonwealth Insurance Company of New York, 60 N.M. 379, 291 P.2d 1099 (1955).

We believe the slightest doubt does exist on the issues of negligence and proximate cause.

The summary judgment is reversed.

It is so ordered.

HENDLEY and COWAN, JJ., concur.

WOOD, C. J., not participating.
#### John F. Burke, Respondent, v. William H. Burke, Appellant.

Motion for leave to appeal to Court of Appeals granted and question for review certified.
### Part D—Offenses and Penalties
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM
AMERITECH CORPORATION'S JUNE 30, 1998 CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                  6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1998
<CASH>                                         280,000
<SECURITIES>                                         0<F1>
<RECEIVABLES>                                3,311,000
<ALLOWANCES>                                  (303,000)
<INVENTORY>                                    348,000
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             5,134,000
<PP&E>                                      35,475,000
<DEPRECIATION>                              21,450,000
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              29,045,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        6,312,000
<BONDS>                                      7,013,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                     1,177,000
<OTHER-SE>                                   8,898,000
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                29,045,000
<SALES>                                              0<F2>
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             8,422,000
<CGS>                                                0<F3>
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                6,353,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                            (1,678,000)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             322,000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              3,425,000
<INCOME-TAX>                                 1,225,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          2,200,000
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 2,200,000
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    2.00<F4>
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    1.98<F4>
<FN>
<F1>WE HAVE NOT STATED SECURITIES SEPARATELY IN THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS 
BECAUSE THEY ARE NOT MATERIAL. WE HAVE INCLUDED THEM IN THE "CASH" TAG.
<F2>NET SALES OF TANGIBLE PRODUCTS IS NOT MORE THAN 10% OF TOTAL OPERATING
REVENUES. WE THEREFORE HAVE NOT STATED THESE SALES SEPARATELY IN THE
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS, PER REGULATION S-X, RULE 5-03(B). WE HAVE INCLUDED
THESE SALES IN THE "TOTAL REVENUES" TAG.
<F3>WE HAVE INCLUDED COST OF TANGIBLE GOODS SOLD IN COST OF SERVICE AND
PRODUCTS IN THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND THE "TOTAL COST" TAG, PER REGULATION
S-X, RULE 5-03(B).
<F4>WE HAVE CALCULATED EARNINGS PER SHARE AMOUNTS IN ACCORDANCE WITH FAS
128 "EARNINGS PER SHARE." WE HAVE ENTERED BASIC AND DILUTED AMOUNTS IN PLACE
OF PRIMARY AND FULLY DILUTED, RESPECTIVELY.
</FN>
        


</TABLE>
Electrical Conductivity, UMHOS

Day High Low Mean

1 0 0 0

2 0 0 0

3 0 0 0

4 0 0 0

5 0 0 0

6 0 0 0

7 0 0 0

8 0 0 0

9 0 0 0

10 0 0 0

11 0 0 0

12 0 0 0

13 0 0 0

14 0 0 0

15 0 0 0

16 0 0 0

17 0 0 0

18 0 0 0

19 0 0 0

20 0 0 0

21 0 0 0

22 0 0 0

23 0 0 0

24 0 0 0

25 0 0 0

26 0 0 0

27 0 0 0

28 0 0 0

29 0 0 0

30 0 0 0

31 0 0 0

COMMENT(S):

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

Historical Archive and Report Database

Port Chicago Bottom In Suisun Bay

Period: December 2023 Run Date: 1/16/2024
### §965. Applicability of part E of subchapter I

Part E of subchapter I shall apply with respect to functions of the Attorney General (and of officers and employees of the Bureau of Narcotics and Dangerous Drugs) under this subchapter, to administrative and judicial proceedings under this subchapter, and to violations of this subchapter, to the same extent that such part applies to functions of the Attorney General (and such officers and employees) under subchapter I, to such proceedings under subchapter I, and to violations of subchapter I. For purposes of the application of this section to section 880 or 881 of this title, any reference in such section 880 or 881 of this title to "this subchapter" shall be deemed to be a reference to this subchapter, any reference to section 823 of this title shall be deemed to be a reference to section 958 of this title, and any reference to section 822(d) of this title shall be deemed to be a reference to section 957(b)(2) of this title.

(Pub. L. 91–513, title III, §1015, Oct. 27, 1970, 84 Stat. 1291; Pub. L. 95–633, title III, §301(b), Nov. 10, 1978, 92 Stat. 3778.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

1978—Pub. L. 95–633 inserted "or 881" after "880" wherever appearing.

#### **Executive Documents**

#### Transfer of Functions

For abolition of Bureau of Narcotics and Dangerous Drugs, including Office of Director thereof, and creation of a single comprehensive agency for enforcement of drug laws by Reorg. Plan No. 2 of 1973, eff. July 1, 1973, 38 F.R. 15932, 87 Stat. 1091, see note set out under section 881 of this title.
Exhibit 3.1
 SECOND AMENDMENT TO
AMENDED AND RESTATED BYLAWS OF
APARTMENT TRUST OF AMERICA, INC.
(f/k/a Grubb & Ellis Apartment REIT, Inc. and NNN Apartment REIT, Inc.)
  WITNESSETH:
          APARTMENT TRUST OF AMERICA, INC.By:
    /s/ Stanley J. Olander. Jr.Name:
    Stanley J. Olander, Jr.Title:
    Chief Executive Officer and Chairman of the
Board of Directors
Exhibit 23
 Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
  /s/ McGladrey & Pullen, LLPStamford, ConnecticutJune 29, 2011 17
§ 219.4 Who is responsible for furnishing evidence. ( a ) *Claimant or representative responsible.* When evidence is required to prove a person's eligibility for or right to continue to receive annuity or lump-sum payments, that claimant or his or her representative is responsible for obtaining and submitting the evidence to the Board.
( b ) *What to do when required evidence will be delayed.* When the required evidence cannot be furnished within the specified time, the claimant or representative who was asked to furnish the evidence or information should notify the Board and explain why there will be a delay. If the delay is caused by illness, failure to receive the information from another source, or a similar situation, the claimant will be allowed a reasonable time to secure the evidence or information. If the information is not received within a reasonable time as determined by the Board, the claimant or representative who was asked to furnish the evidence or information will be notified of the effect that his or her failure to furnish the evidence or information will have on the claimant's eligibility to receive or continue to receive payments.
#### § 30.226 How does a claimant establish that a covered uranium employee has sustained a consequential injury, illness, impairment or disease?

An injury, illness, impairment or disease sustained as a consequence of a medical condition covered by the provisions of § 30.225(a) must be established with a fully rationalized medical report by a physician that shows the relationship between the injury, illness, impairment or disease and the accepted medical condition. Neither the fact that the injury, illness, impairment or disease manifests itself after a diagnosis of a medical condition covered by the provisions of § 30.225(a), nor the belief of the claimant that the injury, illness, impairment or disease was caused by such a condition, is sufficient in itself to prove a causal relationship.
**Creating, Editing and Assigning Service Locations in the My AmeriCorps Portal**

**Data Quality and Service Locations** Service location data is used to produce State Profiles and other reports for external stakeholders. For data quality purposes, please check for these common data entry errors when creating or editing service locations:  No ZIP + 4 code  Incorrect address information  Spelling mistakes Note: If you have the street address but not the ZIP + 4 code for a service location, you can look it up easily at http://zip4.usps.com . **Getting Started** Login to eGrants ( https://egrants.cns.gov/espan/main/login.jsp ) and select the Portal Home link at the right bottom of the screen.Click on the Manage Programs link on the left of the screen.

Select a program year and click the Search button.Select the link for your site .

I n the center of the screen, you will see basic contact information for your site. Click View Service Locations at the bottom right of the screen.To create a new service location, click create in the bottom right corner of the screen.

To edit an existing service location, click the hyperlink for the location you would like to edit.

**Creating a New Service Location** Click the Create button in the lower right of the screen.At the top of the screen, you will be asked whether the service location is a K - 12 school.

If the service location is not a K- 12 school, click no and complete all remaining text fields for the service location. If the service location is a K12 schoo l, click yes. If you know the service location’s NCES School ID, enter it in the text field and click the Go button. If you do not know the NCES School ID, click the hyperlink to search for it.The hyperlink will bring you to the NCES website . S earch for your school by city and

state, zip or name.Clicking on the name of the school opens a popup where you can find the NCES School

ID. Copy and paste the NCES School ID into eGrants and click the Go button.

A popup with the school’s contact information will appear in eGrants. Click OK in the popup window to confirm the information.The school’s information will automatically populate in the service location text fields.

Complete the contact name and contact email text fields and click save.

**Editing an Existing Service Location** Click on the hyperlink for the service location you want to edit.Click the edit button in the lower right corner of the screen.

For service locations that existed before the addition of the NCES School ID fields, the default answer to “Is this a K- 12 school?” will be “no.” If the service location is a K - 12 school, click the “yes’ button and enter the NCES School ID information as described in the previous section. Update any other text fiel ds you wish to edit and click the Save button.**Enrolling AmeriCorps Members in Service Locations**

When you enroll AmeriCorps members, you will select each individual’s Service Location on their Enrollment Form when you certify and submit online. In order to meet CNCS’s requirements, members must be enrolled in a service location.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY HIGH

 14,167

 14,445

 13,692

 14,761

 14,208

 14,850

 16,187

 16,383

 17,769

 17,963

 18,000

 16,809

 16,929

 17,611

 18,209

 18,652

 17,996

 17,870

 17,230

 17,324

 17,559

 17,217

 17,561

 17,812

 17,758

 16,724

 17,917

 17,796

 18,303

 18,769

 17,662

 7,803

 7,845

 7,467

 6,238

 6,800

 6,591

 6,679

 6,611

 7,917

 8,837

 9,117

 7,546

 9,395

 9,945

 9,723

 10,210

 4,596

 8,574

 7,856

 7,071

 7,130

 7,814

 8,172

 9,521

 9,882

 7,717

 10,490

 10,141

 11,032

 10,146

 10,581

 10,884

 10,822

 10,291

 10,226

 10,413

 10,491

 11,304

 12,209

 13,256

 13,827

 13,678

 12,923

 13,039

 13,856

 13,916

 14,251

 11,599

 12,596

 11,965

 11,769

 12,432

 12,739

 12,974

 14,159

 14,111

 12,667

 14,251

 14,026

 14,239

 14,768

 13,823

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

OCTOBER 2016 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: November 1, 2016

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

PITTSBURG BOTTOM ON THE SACRAMENTO RIVER
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

DAY ELEV

 581.79

 582.94

 582.86

 583.35

 582.21

 580.24

 578.92

 579.83

 581.30

 582.26

 582.11

 581.59

 580.80

 580.39

 579.56

 579.97

 582.72

 582.11

 582.83

 582.72

 581.93

 581.31

 580.64

 580.60

 580.65

 581.65

 582.84

 581.70

 581.62

 582.60

 20,563

 21,247

 21,199

 21,495

 20,811

 19,662

 18,918

 19,428

 20,276

 20,841

 20,752

 20,446

 19,985

 19,749

 19,277

 19,507

 21,116

 20,752

 21,182

 21,116

 20,645

 20,282

 19,893

 19,870

 19,898

 20,481

 21,187

 20,510

 20,463

 21,044

STORAGE

-642

+684

-48

+296

-684

-1,149

-744

+510

+848

+565

-89

-306

-461

-236

-472

+230

+1,609

-364

+430

-66

-471

-363

-389

-23

+28

+583

+706

-677

-47

+581

CHANGE

4,693

5,361

4,987

5,170

4,473

4,236

4,442

5,073

5,241

5,098

4,769

4,655

4,573

4,687

4,574

4,931

5,424

4,240

4,624

4,378

4,170

4,040

3,818

3,999

4,025

4,229

4,219

3,511

3,839

4,122

INFLOW

 5,015

 5,014

 5,008

 5,019

 4,816

 4,812

 4,816

 4,814

 4,811

 4,813

 4,812

 4,809

 4,805

 4,804

 4,812

 4,815

 4,612

 4,423

 4,407

 4,411

 4,404

 4,221

 4,014

 4,010

 4,010

 3,934

 3,861

 3,850

 3,862

 3,827

POWER

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

SPILL

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

FISHTRAP

 2

 2

 3

 2

 2

 3

 1

 2

 2

 0

 2

 0

 0

 2

 0

 0

 1

 1

 0

 0

 3

 2

 0

 1

 1

 1

 2

 2

 1

 2

C.F.S.

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

NOVEMBER 2020 KESWICK RESERVOIR DAILY OPERATIONS RUN DATE: December 1, 2020

RES.

EVAP

C.F.S.

COMPUTED*

ACRE-FEET

RELEASE - C.F.S. 

TOTALS -161 135,601 135,641 0 0 40

ACRE-FEET -161 268,965 269,044 0 0 79

SUMMARY

RELEASE (ACRE-FEET)

POWER 269,044

SPILL 0

 21,205

FISH TRAP 0

SPRING

CR. P. P.

RELEASE (1)

 372

 388

 393

 465

 40

 130

 207

 57

 134

 40

 75

 83

 303

 192

 105

 42

 41

 38

 278

 258

 562

 114

 43

 63

 40

 97

 41

 41

 41

 73

 4,756

 9,434

*COMPUTED INFLOW IS SUM OF CHANGE IN STORAGE, RELEASES, AND EVAPORATION.

(1) EVAPORATION RECORDS TAKEN FROM SHASTA PAN.

SHASTA

RELEASE

C.F.S

 4,246

 4,816

 4,455

 4,646

 4,374

 3,913

 4,138

 4,867

 5,010

 4,961

 4,621

 4,485

 4,102

 4,376

 4,412

 4,766

 5,271

 4,055

 4,123

 4,006

 3,513

 3,799

 3,628

 3,794

 3,814

 3,868

 4,060

 3,350

 3,651

 3,910

 127,030

 251,964
-       - Superintendent of Documents
      - 2023-09-05T08:15:15-0400
      - Government Publishing Office, Washington, DC 20401
      - Government Publishing Office
      - Government Publishing Office attests that this document has not been altered since it was disseminated by Government Publishing Office
(No. 74-CC-175

#### Scientific Products Division of American Hospital Supply Corp., Claimant, *vs.*State of Illinois, Department of Public Health, Respondent.

*Opinion filed January 31, 1974.*

Scientific Products Division of American Hospital Supply Corp., Claimant, pro se.

William J. Scott, Attorney General; Edward L. S. Arkema, Jr., Assistant Attorney General, for Respondent.

*212Per Curiam.
(No. 7093

#### Dr. Gene J. Sbalchiero, D.D.S., Claimant, *vs.*State of Illinois, Department of Mental Health, Respondent.

*Opinion filed April 11, 1973.*

Dr. Gene J. Sbalchiero, D.D.S., Claimant, pro se.

William J. Scott, Attorney General; Saul R. Wexler, Assistant Attorney General, for Respondent.

Per Curiam.
#### Estates of Sands Point, Inc., et al., Respondents, v. Town of North Hempstead, Appellant.

No opinion. Present — Close, P. J., Hagarty, Carswell, Johnston and Adel, JJ.
Electrical Conductivity, UMHOS

Day High Low Mean

1 428 382 403

2 424 385 404

3 417 374 397

4 412 375 396

5 408 379 395

6 415 374 398

7 415 376 403

8 413 378 403

9 407 363 394

10 408 362 392

11 399 374 389

12 391 373 384

13 386 369 379

14 386 370 379

15 381 367 376

16 385 372 377

17 390 365 376

18 0 0 0

19 0 0 0

20 0 0 0

21 0 0 0

22 0 0 0

23 0 0 0

24 0 0 0

25 0 0 0

26 0 0 0

27 0 0 0

28 0 0 0

29 0 0 0

30 0 0 0

COMMENT(S):

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

Historical Archive and Report Database

Farrar Park At Dutch Slough 

Period: September 2023 Run Date: 10/6/2023
###### Editorial Note on [Part 555](/current/title-27/part-555?toc=1)

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 555 appear by T.D. ATF-487, [68 FR 3748](https://www.federalregister.gov/citation/68-FR-3748), Jan. 24, 2003.

#### § 555.222 Table of distances between fireworks process buildings and between fireworks process and fireworks nonprocess buildings.

| Net weight of fireworks1 (pounds) | Display fireworks2 (feet) | Consumer fireworks3 (feet) |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 0-100 | 57 | 37 |
| 101-200 | 69 | 37 |
| 201-300 | 77 | 37 |
| 301-400 | 85 | 37 |
| 401-500 | 91 | 37 |
| Above 500 | Not permitted4 5 | Not permitted4 5 |
| | | |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 1 Net weight is the weight of all pyrotechnic compositions, and explosive materials and fuse only. | | |
| 2 The distances in this column apply only with natural or artificial barricades. If such barricades are not used, the distances must be doubled. | | |
| 3 While consumer fireworks or articles pyrotechnic in a finished state are not subject to regulation, explosive materials used to manufacture or assemble such fireworks or articles are subject to regulation. Thus, fireworks process buildings where consumer fireworks or articles pyrotechnic are being processed shall meet these requirements. | | |
| 4 A maximum of 500 pounds of in-process pyrotechnic compositions, either loose or in partially-assembled fireworks, is permitted in any fireworks process building. Finished display fireworks may not be stored in a fireworks process building. | | |
| 5 A maximum of 10 pounds of flash powder, either in loose form or in assembled units, is permitted in any fireworks process building. Quantities in excess of 10 pounds must be kept in an approved magazine. | | |

[T.D. ATF-293, [55 FR 3723](https://www.federalregister.gov/citation/55-FR-3723), Feb. 5, 1990, as amended by T.D. ATF-400, [63 FR 45004](https://www.federalregister.gov/citation/63-FR-45004), Aug. 24, 1998]
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### Centers for Disease Control and Prevention

The meeting announced below concerns Conducting Public Health Research in Kenya, Request for Application (RFA) GH10-003, Panel B, initial review.

In accordance with Section 10(a)(2) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act (Pub. L. 92-463), the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) announces the aforementioned meeting:

*Time and Date:*                         12 p.m.-4 p.m., June 23, 2011 (Closed).                    

*Place:*                         Teleconference.                    

*Status:*                         The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with provisions set forth in Section 552b(c)(4) and (6), Title 5 U.S.C., and the Determination of the Director, Management Analysis and Services Office, CDC, pursuant to Public Law 92-463.                    

*Matters To Be Discussed:*                         The meeting will include the initial review, discussion, and evaluation of applications received in response to “Conducting Public Health Research in Kenya, RFA GH10-003, Panel B, initial review.”                    

*Contact Person for More Information:*                         Lata Kumar, M.B.A., M.P.H., Scientific Review Officer, Center of Global Health Science Office, Center for Global Health, CDC, 1600                               ( print page 21749)                            Clifton Road, NE., Mailstop D69, Atlanta, Georgia 30333, Telephone: (404) 553-8311.                    

                        The Director, Management Analysis and Services Office, has been delegated the authority to sign                         **Federal Register**                         notices pertaining to announcements of meetings and other committee management activities, for both the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, and the Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry.                    

Dated: April 11, 2011.

Elaine L. Baker,

Director, Management Analysis and Services Office, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

[FR Doc. 2011-9240 Filed 4-15-11; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4163-18-P