alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# C_2012011EN.01001301.xml

| 13.1.2012 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 11/13 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

13.1.2012

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 11/13

---

Update of reference amounts for the crossing of the external borders, as referred to in Article 5(3) of Regulation (EC) No 562/2006 of the European Parliament and of the Council establishing a Community Code on the rules governing the movement of persons across borders (Schengen Borders Code) (OJ C 247, 13.10.2006, p. 19; OJ C 153, 6.7.2007, p. 22; OJ C 182, 4.8.2007, p. 18; OJ C 57, 1.3.2008, p. 38; OJ C 134, 31.5.2008, p. 19; OJ C 37, 14.2.2009, p. 8; OJ C 35, 12.2.2010, p. 7; OJ C 304, 10.11.2010, p. 5; OJ C 24, 26.1.2011, p. 6; OJ C 157, 27.5.2011, p. 8; OJ C 203, 9.7.2011, p. 16)

2012/C 11/03

The publication of reference amounts for the crossing of the external borders, as referred to in Article 5(3) of Regulation (EC) No 562/2006 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 15 March 2006 establishing a Community Code on the rules governing the movement of persons across borders (Schengen Borders Code), is based on the information communicated by the Member States to the Commission in accordance with Article 34 of the Schengen Borders Code.

In addition to the publication in the Official Journal, a monthly update is available on the website of the Directorate-General for Home Affairs.

SWEDEN

Replacement of the information published in OJ C 247, 13.10.2006

Replacement of the information published in OJ C 247, 13.10.2006

As of 15 November 2011, the reference amount for crossing the border is set by Swedish legislation at an amount of SEK 450 per day.

---
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY ELEV

 122.97

 123.35

 123.23

 123.42

 123.73

 123.67

 123.22

 122.93

 122.98

 122.90

 122.92

 123.14

 122.96

 122.95

 123.53

 123.17

 122.48

 122.22

 122.10

 122.29

 123.06

 123.11

 123.50

 123.67

 123.02

 123.40

 123.46

 124.10

 124.11

 124.21

 123.94

 7,778

 7,956

 7,899

 7,988

 8,134

 8,106

 7,894

 7,760

 7,782

 7,746

 7,755

 7,857

 7,773

 7,769

 8,040

 7,871

 7,557

 7,440

 7,386

 7,472

 7,819

 7,843

 8,026

 8,106

 7,800

 7,979

 8,007

 8,311

 8,316

 8,366

 8,233

STORAGE

-248

+178

-57

+89

+146

-28

-212

-134

+22

-36

+9

+102

-84

-4

+271

-169

-314

-117

-54

+86

+347

+24

+183

+80

-306

+179

+28

+304

+5

+50

-133

CHANGE

1,650

1,875

1,758

1,833

1,889

1,657

1,431

1,456

1,532

1,507

1,530

1,571

1,482

1,521

1,667

1,447

1,371

1,474

1,508

1,575

1,717

1,552

1,639

1,580

1,391

1,643

1,566

1,702

1,551

1,560

1,442

INFLOW

 1,712

 1,716

 1,715

 1,715

 1,718

 1,589

 1,465

 1,277

 1,465

 1,468

 1,328

 1,463

 1,466

 1,465

 1,466

 1,464

 1,461

 1,465

 1,467

 1,465

 1,468

 1,462

 1,470

 1,464

 1,467

 1,147

 1,455

 1,452

 1,452

 1,451

 1,447

POWER

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 185

 0

 0

 139

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 317

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

SPILL

 45

 45

 45

 45

 45

 45

 45

 45

 45

 45

 45

 45

 45

 45

 45

 45

 45

 45

 45

 45

 45

 45

 45

 45

 45

 45

 45

 45

 45

 45

 45

HATCHERY

 3

 3

 2

 3

 3

 3

 3

 2

 1

 2

 3

 2

 3

 3

 3

 3

 3

 3

 3

 2

 3

 3

 2

 1

 3

 4

 2

 2

 1

 2

 2

C.F.S.

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

OCTOBER 2020 LAKE NATOMA DAILY OPERATIONS RUN DATE: November 1, 2020

IN LAKE

EVAP

C.F.S.

COMPUTED*

ACRE-FEET

RELEASE - C.F.S.

TOTALS +207 49,077 46,085 641 1,395 78

ACRE-FEET +207 97,344 91,410 1,271 2,767 155

COMMENTS:

* COMPUTED INFLOW IS THE SUM OF CHANGE IN STORAGE, RELEASES AND EVAPORATION.

SUMMARY

RELEASES (ACRE-FEET)

POWER 91,410

SPILL 1,271

FOLSOM SOUTH CANAL

HATCHERY

 1,533

 2,767

 8,026

FOLSOM

SOUTH 

 15

 21

 25

 25

 49

 34

 25

 15

 10

 10

 10

 10

 10

 10

 16

 20

 20

 20

 20

 20

 26

 30

 30

 30

 30

 40

 50

 50

 50

 37

 15

 773

 1,533

(1)

(1) INCHES OF EVAPORATION TAKEN FROM FOLSOM PAN.

RELEASES (ACRE-FEET) 

TOTAL 96,981
EXHIBIT 22

The  following  is a  list  of  all  subsidiaries  of  Selectronics,  Inc.  (the
"Company") as of June 20, 1995:

     1.   Microlytics, Inc.*, a New York corporation.

     2    Selectronics Far East, Ltd., a corporation organized under the laws of
          the country of Hong Kong.

     3.   Selectronics Japan, a Japanese corporation.

     4.   MicroPages, Inc.*, a New York corporation.


*implies wholly-owned subsidiary.

In addition,  Information Retrieval Technologies,  Inc., a New York corporation,
is a wholly-owned subsidiary of Microlytics, Inc.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

DAY HIGH

 11,793

 15,885

 13,054

 14,736

 14,782

 16,015

 14,637

 11,789

 11,527

 10,499

 10,553

 9,255

 7,828

 8,652

 9,354

 10,558

 10,074

 11,334

 10,577

 9,215

 8,704

 8,382

 9,026

 8,443

 7,750

 7,719

 6,878

 6,076

 6,671

 5,412

 4,261

 5,239

 5,840

 5,163

 5,227

 4,726

 5,047

 5,009

 4,184

 4,246

 4,383

 3,885

 2,795

 2,512

 2,446

 3,084

 2,872

 2,712

 3,222

 3,588

 3,548

 2,894

 3,603

 3,180

 3,537

 3,395

 2,350

 2,822

 2,565

 2,213

 7,138

 9,690

 9,058

 9,357

 8,641

 8,998

 9,393

 7,991

 7,628

 7,270

 6,934

 6,005

 4,949

 5,153

 5,221

 5,901

 5,936

 5,842

 6,120

 5,970

 5,976

 5,512

 6,201

 6,116

 5,837

 5,064

 4,547

 4,209

 4,268

 3,793

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

NOVEMBER 2005 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: December 6, 2005

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

PITTSBURG TOP ON THE SACRAMENTO RIVER
Exhibit 31.3

CERTIFICATIONS

I, Rex L. Smith, III, certify that:

1. I have
reviewed this Amendment No. 1 to Annual Report on Form 10-K/A for the year ended December 31, 2012 of Community Bankers Trust Corporation; and

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under
which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report.



/s/    Rex L. Smith, IIIRex L. Smith, III President
and Chief Executive Officer


Date: April 30, 2013
#### Bertha A. Ehrmann, Respondent, v. City of New York, Appellant.

In an action to recover damages for personal injuries sustained in falling over an upheaved portion of sidewalk, judgment in: favor of plaintiff affirmed, with costs. No opinion. Lewis, P. J., Carswell, Adel and Sneed, JJ., concur; Wenzel, J., dissents and votes to reverse the judgment and to dismiss the complaint, with the following memorandum: The accident, which happened on September 23, 1944, was one of the sequel® of the hurricane of September 14, 1944. In the . nine days between the storm and the happening of the accident the city used all the facilities of the park department, highway department, and emergency squad of the police department to remedy the havoc of the unprecedented storm. It had its regular functions to carry on, but I think the record shows that the city did what could be done within practical limitations. It is suggested that the city might have placed a lantern as a warning of the defect in the sidewalk. The storm which felled the tree, causing this condition, also brought down miles of electric wiring and left this and many other streets in darkness. Oil lanterns are an anachronism in this age and, while the city has and uses some to mark highway repairs and construction, I do not consider it reasonable to expect it to conjure up the number it would have taken to mark every dangerous spot in the city. There were 13,500 trees down on the streets of Queens County alone. The city is required to use reasonable dispatch in the repair of a dangerous condition of which it has notice. It did so.
<PAGE>
                                                                    Exhibit 11
                                                                    ----------
                    PACIFIC TELESIS GROUP AND SUBSIDIARIES
                   COMPUTATION OF EARNINGS (LOSS) PER SHARE
     (Dollars in millions, except per share amounts; shares in thousands)

                            For the 3 Months Ended   For the 9 Months Ended 
                                  September 30,           September 30,     
                            ----------------------   ----------------------
                                  1995        1994          1995       1994
                            ----------------------   ----------------------
Net income (loss) ........    $(3,085)    $    314      $(2,543)   $    897
                              ========    ========       =======   ========
Weighted average number
 of common shares
 outstanding .............     427,421     424,065       425,184    423,937

Common stock equivalent
 shares applicable to
 stock options............         376       1,268           429      1,277
                              --------    --------       -------   --------
Total number of shares 
 for computing primary
 earnings (loss) per share     427,797     425,333       425,613    425,214

Incremental shares for
 computing fully diluted
 earnings (loss) per share         202           0           149          0
                              --------    --------       -------   --------
Total number of shares
 for computing fully
 diluted earnings (loss)
 per share...............      427,999     425,333       425,762    425,214
                              ========    ========      ========   ========
Earnings (loss) per 
 common  share 
 (as reported)...........     $ (7.22)    $   0.74      $ (5.98)   $   2.12
Primary earnings (loss)
 per share...............     $ (7.21)    $   0.74      $ (5.97)   $   2.11
Fully diluted earnings
 (loss) per share........     $ (7.21)    $   0.74      $ (5.97)   $   2.11

Earnings (loss) per share amounts for the three- and  nine-month periods ended
September  30,  1995  and 1994,  as  reported  in  the Condensed  Consolidated
Statements of  Income, were  based on  the weighted average  number of  common
shares  outstanding for  the respective  periods.   Primary and  fully diluted
earnings (loss) per share amounts were not shown in the Condensed Consolidated
Statements  of Income, as  they differ  from the  reported earnings  per share
amounts by less than three percent.
#### In the Matter of the Claim of Raphael Chiara, Appellant, against Villa Charlotte Bronte et al, Respondents. Workmen’s Compensation Board, Respondent.

This is an appeal by the claimant from a decision of the Workmen’s Compensation Board, dated and filed October 10, 1946, disallowing and dismissing claimant’s claim. The claimant was employed as a house superintendent in an apartment house. Some of his duties consisted of collecting garbage and carrying the same downstairs in baskets. The baskets when filled with garbage weighed from sixty to seventy pounds. On November 3, 1944, while Qolleeting the garbage and on his last trip to the incinerator, he felt a burning sensation in his chest and cold perspiration running all over him. He immediately went to his apartment and upon examination by a physician was hospitalized, and it appeared from the evidence that he suffered an acute coronary occlusion. The board found that the proof adduced was “ of insufficient nature to warrant finding that the claimant sustained an accident arising out of and in the course of his employment.” Therefore, there was no causal relation between claimant’s disabling condition and his employment. The evidence sustains the finding of the board. Decision affirmed, without costs. Heffernan, Brewster, Foster and Russell, JJ., concur; Hill, P. J.,, dissents, with the following memorandum: The statute gives to the referee and the board complete jurisdiction when a question of fact is presented. The medical evidence on behalf of the claimant shows causal relation. The employer’s physician said: “There is no question of a coronary occlusion was due to coronary sclerosis, it is always due-to coronary sclerosis, physical effort is not the cause of coronary sclerosis and coronary sclerosis is the cause of coronary thrombosis, therefore there is no causal relation. * * “ No, effort is not the cause of coronary occlusion, and there is no question that the patient had a coronary occlusion; there are cases just as often when coronary occlusion occurs, while people are at rest and sometimes in bed.” Hundreds of awards have been made and affirmed upon a theory at variance with the quoted testimony. I vote to reverse and remit this case hoping that this seeming variance be reconciled by the board.
SECTION 302 CERTIFICATION

         I, David Bending, certify that:

           1.  I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-KSB of Americana Gold andDiamond Holdings, Inc. 

           2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of amaterial fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, inlight of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading withrespect to the period covered by this report. 

           3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial informationincluded in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition,results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periodspresented in this report; 

           4. I am responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls andprocedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d- 14) for the registrant andhave: 

                a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensurethat material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidatedsubsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during theperiod in which this report is being prepared. 

                b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’sdisclosure controls and procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date ofthis report (the “Evaluation Date”); and 

                c) Presented in this report our conclusions about theeffectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures based on our evaluation as of theEvaluation Date; 

           5. I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation, to the registrant’sauditors and the audit committee of registrant’s board of directors (or personsperforming the equivalent functions): 

                a) All significant deficiencies in the design or operation ofinternal controls which could adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record,process, summarize and report financial data and have identified for the registrant’sauditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and 

                b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves managementor other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal controls;and 

           6. I have indicated in this report whether or not there were significant changes ininternal controls or in other factors that could significantly affect internal controlssubsequent to the date of our most recent evaluation, including any corrective actionswith regard to significant deficiencies and material weaknesses.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY HIGH

 22,467

 21,654

 20,596

 20,494

 21,530

 23,641

 25,606

 26,762

 26,225

 26,325

 24,748

 25,209

 24,365

 22,865

 23,827

 23,079

 24,413

 26,731

 25,174

 26,429

 27,319

 27,726

 27,469

 25,978

 24,824

 24,744

 25,219

 24,599

 23,521

 23,666

 23,814

 12,028

 12,472

 12,146

 10,762

 10,027

 10,271

 11,066

 11,652

 10,902

 10,115

 10,459

 10,251

 10,703

 11,543

 12,360

 12,785

 12,276

 12,664

 13,322

 12,096

 12,451

 13,046

 13,704

 13,849

 13,670

 12,334

 14,203

 13,701

 14,603

 13,827

 13,379

 17,745

 16,979

 16,127

 15,414

 15,632

 16,988

 17,639

 18,519

 18,012

 17,832

 17,709

 17,593

 17,451

 17,697

 18,341

 17,654

 18,177

 19,699

 18,949

 19,175

 19,737

 20,252

 20,648

 19,857

 20,074

 19,679

 20,401

 20,064

 19,596

 18,586

 18,506

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

OCTOBER 2005 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: November 2, 2005

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

PORT CHICAGO BOTTOM IN SUISUN BAY
The Honorable Robert T. Dawson, United States District Judge for the Western *

District of Arkansas, sitting by designation.

United States Court of Appeals

FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

_____________

No. 98-1419EA

_____________

United States of America, *

*

Appellee, * Appeal from the United States

* District Court for the Eastern

v. * District of Arkansas.

*

Monty R. Hobbs; Patte A. Hobbs, * [UNPUBLISHED]

*

Appellants. *

_____________

 Submitted: November 17, 1998

Filed: November 27, 1998 

_____________

Before RICHARD S. ARNOLD and FAGG, Circuit Judges, and DAWSON, District *

Judge.

_____________

PER CURIAM.

Monty R. Hobbs and Patte A. Hobbs operated a successful construction

business. In 1990 and 1991, the Hobbses filed fraudulent joint personal income tax

returns and a jury convicted them for aiding and abetting in false tax returns. We

affirm.
-2-

Initially, the Hobbses contend the evidence does not support their convictions.

The Government offered into evidence checks totaling more than one million dollars

written to the Hobbses for homes built in 1990 and 1991, personal profit and loss

statements showing the Hobbses’ annual net income for 1990 and 1991 exceeded one

hundred thousand dollars, and signed tax returns the Hobbses submitted to lending

institutions listing substantially greater incomes than the returns filed with the Internal

Revenue Service. Also, former employees testified about the Hobbses’ fraudulent tax

plans. Having reviewed the record, we conclude sufficient evidence exists from which

a reasonable jury could find the Hobbses guilty beyond a reasonable doubt. See United

States v. Bussey, 942 F.2d 1241, 1251 (8th Cir. 1991). 

Next, the Hobbses contend the Government improperly questioned Monty Hobbs

about his views on the bombing of the federal building in Oklahoma City. They also

claim the district court erroneously failed to give a curative instruction or declare a

mistrial sua sponte following the question. The district court sustained the Hobbses’

objection to the unanswered question, and they did not ask the district court for the

relief they now seek, so we review for plain error and find none. See United States v.

Olano, 507 U.S. 725, 732-37 (1993). 

Finally, the Hobbses assert the district court improperly instructed the jury on

willful blindness. The Hobbses claim they are innocent because they relied on their

accountant to set up their business and to file their tax returns, and they had no reason

to believe their accountant acted fraudulently. After considering the record and viewing

the evidence in a light most favorable to the Government, we find no error in the district

court’s instruction. See Bussey, 942 F.2d at 1246-48. Even if we assume an error, we

believe the error was harmless given the overwhelming evidence against the Hobbses.

See Mattingly v. United States, 924 F.2d 785, 792 (8th Cir. 1991).

We affirm the Hobbses’ convictions.
-3-

A true copy.

Attest:

CLERK, U.S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.
### §80a. Display of contributions of Armed Forces

#### (a) Study center; historical collections

The Smithsonian Institution shall commemorate and display the contributions made by the military forces of the Nation toward creating, developing, and maintaining a free, peaceful, and independent society and culture in the United States of America. The valor and sacrificial service of the men and women of the Armed Forces shall be portrayed as an inspiration to the present and future generations of America. The demands placed upon the full energies of our people, the hardships endured, and the sacrifice demanded in our constant search for world peace shall be clearly demonstrated. The extensive peacetime contributions the Armed Forces have made to the advance of human knowledge in science, nuclear energy, polar and space exploration, electronics, engineering, aeronautics, and medicine shall be graphically described. The Smithsonian Institution shall interpret through dramatic display significant current problems affecting the Nation's security. It shall be equipped with a study center for scholarly research into the meaning of war, its effect on civilization, and the role of the Armed Forces in maintaining a just and lasting peace by providing a powerful deterrent to war. In fulfilling its purposes, the Smithsonian Institution shall collect, preserve, and exhibit military objects of historical interest and significance.

#### (b) National Air and Space Museum provisions unaffected

The provisions of this subchapter in no way rescind subchapter VII of this chapter, which established the National Air and Space Museum of the Smithsonian Institution, or any other authority of the Smithsonian Institution.

(Pub. L. 87–186, §2, Aug. 30, 1961, 75 Stat. 414; Pub. L. 89–509, pt. I, §2, July 19, 1966, 80 Stat. 310.)

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Change of Name

"National Air and Space Museum" substituted for "National Air Museum" in subsec. (b) pursuant to section 2 of Pub. L. 89–509, which is classified to section 77 of this title.