alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 7.43 Relabeling activities that require separate written authorization from TTB. ( a ) *General.* Any permittee or brewer holding malt beverages for sale who needs to relabel the containers but is not the original bottler may apply for written permission for the relabeling of malt beverage containers. The appropriate TTB officer may permit relabeling of malt beverages in containers if the facts show that the relabeling is for the purpose of compliance with the requirements of this part or State law, or for the purpose of replacing damaged labels.
( b ) *Application.* The written application must include: ( 1 ) Copies of the original and proposed new labels;
( 2 ) The circumstances of the request, including the reason for relabeling;
( 3 ) The number of containers to be relabeled;
( 4 ) The location where the relabeling will take place; and,
( 5 ) The name and address of the person who will be conducting the relabeling operations.
A-AA+Skip to content

                  - Home
                  - Compendium Statistics
                  - Event
                  - Archives
                  - Glossary
                  - Help
                  - Contact
                  - Research on Disability

Annual Disability Statistics Compendium

              - Home /
              - Archives /
              - 2012 Compendium Statistics /
              - 2012 Veterans /
              - 2012 6.6 Veterans Benefits Administration - Compensation and Pension Benefits Paid to Disabled Veterans

## Table 6.6: Veterans Benefits Administration—Compensation and Pension Benefits Paid to Veterans with Disabilities ($): Federal Fiscal Year 2011

----

----

 

----

#### 2012 Disability Compendium

                        - Home
                        - Compendium Statistics                           - Population and Prevelance
                          - Employment
                          - Time Trend Population Statistics
                          - Poverty
                          - Earnings
                          - Veterans
                          - Health Insurance Coverage
                          - Health
                          - Social Security Administration Programs
                          - Medicaid and Medicare
                          - Special Education
                          - Vocational Rehabilitation
                          - Federal Government Spending and Employment
                          - International Disability Statistics
                          - Population Statistics: Disability Type
                        - Event
                        - Archives                           - 2012 Compendium Statistics
                        - Glossary
                        - Help
                        - Contact
                        - Research on Disability

#### Funding for this project is made possible by:

 The Research and Training Center on Disability Statistics and Demographics (StatsRRTC), which is funded by the U.S. Department of Education, National Institute for Disability and Rehabilitation Research, under cooperative agreements H133B080012.

#### Stay Connected

**Institute on Disability**10 West Edge Drive, Suite 101Durham, NH 03824603.862.4320 | relay: 711 | [email protected]www.iod.unh.edu

© 2013. Institute on Disability.University of New Hampshire.
#### § 225.25 RR Earnings PIA used in survivor annuities.

The Railroad Earnings PIA (RR Earnings PIA) used in survivor annuities may be used in computing the tier II component when the survivor tier II is based on a percentage of the employee annuity tier II and the employee had been or would be, if he or she were still alive, entitled to a vested dual benefit. If the employee received a retirement annuity before death, this PIA is identical to the retirement RR Earnings Dual Benefit PIA described in subpart B of this part. If a retirement annuity was not paid before the employee's death, the PIA is determined as if the employee were 65 years old in the month of his or her death. The RR Earnings PIA used in survivor annuities is determined in accordance with section 215 of the Social Security Act as in effect on December 31, 1974. It is computed using the deceased employee's railroad earnings after 1950 (or after 1936, if a higher PIA would result) through December 31, 1974.
§ 216.31 Who is eligible for an age annuity. The Railroad Retirement Act provides annuities based on the employee's age for employees who have been credited with at least 10 years of railroad service. ( a ) *Annuities based on 10 years of service.* An employee with 10 years of railroad service but less than 30 years of service is eligible for an annuity if he or she: ( 1 ) Has attained retirement age; or
( 2 ) Has attained age 62 (the annuity cannot begin prior to the first full month during which the employee is age 62) but is less than retirement age. All components of the annuity are reduced for each month the employee is under retirement age when the annuity begins.
( b ) *Annuities based on 30 years of service.* An employee who has been credited with 30 years of railroad service is eligible for an annuity at age 60 (the annuity cannot begin prior to the first full month the employee is age 60). The Tier I component of the annuity is reduced if the employee meets the following conditions: ( 1 ) The employee annuity begins before the month in which the employee is age 62; and either
( 2 ) He or she had not attained age 60, prior to July 1, 1984; or
( 3 ) He or she had not completed 30 years of railroad service prior to July 1, 1984.
( c ) *Change from employee disability to age annuity.* A disability annuity paid to an employee through the end of the month before the month in which the employee attains retirement age is converted to an age annuity beginning with the month in which he or she attains retirement age.
[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 11 (Tuesday, January 18, 2011)]
[Notices]
[Page 2902]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2011-911]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket No. PR11-79-000]


Enogex LLC; Notice of Filing

January 11, 2011.
    Take notice that on January 6, 2011, Enogex LLD (Enogex) filed a 
Statement of Operating Conditions (SOC) applicable to intrastate 
transportation services. Enogex states that the revisions are solely to 
reflect the revised fuel tracker mechanism accepted by the Commission 
in Docket No. PR10-52-000 as more fully described in the filing.
    Any person desiring to participate in this rate filing must file in 
accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the Commission's Rules of Practice 
and Procedure (18 CFR 385.211 and 385.214). Protests will be considered 
by the Commission in determining the appropriate action to be taken, 
but will not serve to make protestants parties to the proceeding. Any 
person wishing to become a party must file a notice of intervention or 
motion to intervene, as appropriate. Such notices, motions, or protests 
must be filed on or before the date as indicated below. Anyone filing 
an intervention or protest must serve a copy of that document on the 
Applicant. Anyone filing an intervention or protest on or before the 
intervention or protest date need not serve motions to intervene or 
protests on persons other than the Applicant.
    The Commission encourages electronic submission of protests and 
interventions in lieu of paper using the ``eFiling'' link at http://www.ferc.gov. Persons unable to file electronically should submit an 
original and 7 copies of the protest or intervention to the Federal 
Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE., Washington, DC 
20426.
    This filing is accessible on-line at http://www.ferc.gov, using the 
``eLibrary'' link and is available for review in the Commission's 
Public Reference Room in Washington, DC. There is an ``eSubscription'' 
link on the Web site that enables subscribers to receive e-mail 
notification when a document is added to a subscribed docket(s). For 
assistance with any FERC Online service, please e-mail 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#662023342529080a0f080335131616091412260003140548010910"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="4d0b081f0e0223212423281e383d3d223f390d2b283f2e632a223b">[email protected]</span></a>, or call (866) 208-3676 (toll free). For 
TTY, call (202) 502-8659.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Wednesday, January 19, 2010.

Kimberly D. Bose,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2011-911 Filed 1-14-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
#### Byrne, Bowman & Forshay, Inc., Respondent, v. Louis J. Cella, Appellant, et al., Defendants.

Respondent has recovered judgment for the entire brokerage commission against appellant, who owns hut one third of the real property for which respondent has found a prospective purchaser. Unless appellant untruthfully held himself out to respondent as authorized to retain a broker on behalf of the other owners, or acted for undisclosed principals, respondent could recover against him but one third of the commission. The action was erroneously presented to the jury as though the evidence established as matter of law that respondent falsely held himself out as authorized to employ a broker on¡ *851behalf of the other owners, or attempted to bind them as though they were undisclosed principals. The judgment appealed from should be reversed and a new trial granted, with costs to the appellant to abide the event, unless the plaintiff-respondent stipulates to accept one third of the amount of the verdict, with interest thereon from the date of entry of the judgment, and costs, in which event the judgment as so modified is affirmed, without costs of this appeal. Present — Peek, P. J., Glennon, Dore, Van Voorhis and Shientag, JJ.; Glennon, J., dissents and votes to affirm. Settle order on notice.
§ 216.63 Who is eligible for an annuity as a remarried widow(er). ( a ) A widow(er) of an employee who completed 10 years of railroad service and had a current connection with the railroad industry at death is eligible for an annuity as a remarried widow(er) if he or she: ( 1 ) Remarried either: ( i ) After having attained age 60 (after age 50 if disabled); or
( ii ) Before age 60 but the marriage terminated;
( 2 ) Is not entitled to an old-age benefit under the Social Security Act that is equal to or higher than the full amount of the remarried widow(er)'s annuity before any reduction for age; and
( 3 ) Has attained retirement age;
( 4 ) Is at least 50 but less than 60 years of age and is disabled as defined in part 220 of this chapter before the end of the period described in § 216.68 (this results in a reduced annuity);
( 5 ) Has not attained retirement age but has in his or her care a child who either is under age 16 or is disabled, and who is entitled to an annuity under subpart H of this part; or
( 6 ) Is at least age 60 but has not attained retirement age. (In this case, the annuity is reduced for each month the remarried widow(er) is under retirement age when the annuity begins.)
( b ) An individual entitled to a widow(er)'s annuity may be entitled to an annuity as a remarried widow(er) if he or she: ( 1 ) Remarries after having attained age 60 (after age 50 if he or she has been determined to be disabled prior to his or her remarriage) and is not a surviving divorced spouse; or
( 2 ) Is entitled to an annuity based upon having a child of the employee in his or her care and marries an individual entitled to a retirement, disability, widow(er)'s, mother's, father's, parent's, or disabled child's benefit under the Railroad Retirement Act or Social Security Act.
Editorial Note on Part 46
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 46 appear by T.D. ATF-457, 66 FR 32220, 32221, June 14, 2001.

§ 46.127 Change in ownership. ( a ) *General.* A special tax stamp is a receipt for tax, personal to the one to whom issued, and is not transferable from one manufacturer of tobacco products, manufacturer of cigarette papers and tubes, or export warehouse proprietor to another. If there is a change in the ownership of a special-tax payer, the successor must pay a new special (occupational) tax and obtain the required special tax stamp(s). Examples of changes in ownership that require payment of a new special tax include, but are not limited to, the following: ( 1 ) Sale of business;
( 2 ) Formation of a partnership by two persons who have paid special tax;
( 3 ) Addition of a partner;
( 4 ) Incorporation of the business;
( 5 ) Creation of a new corporation to replace one or more corporations that have paid special tax; and
( 6 ) Stockholder continuing the business of a corporation after its dissolution.
( b ) *Changes that do not require payment of a new special tax.* The following changes do not require payment of a special tax: ( 1 ) Increase in capital stock of a corporation.
( 2 ) Change in ownership of any or all of the capital stock of a corporation.
( c ) *Exemption for certain successors.* Persons identified in paragraph (d) of this section as having the right of succession may carry on the business for the remainder of the tax year for which the special tax was paid, without paying a new special tax, if within 30 days after the date on which the successor begins to carry on the business, the successor files with TTB a special tax return on TTB Form 5630.5t showing the basis of succession. A person who is a successor to a business for which special tax has been paid, and who fails to register the succession, is liable for special tax computed from the first day of the calendar month in which the successor began to carry on the business.
( d ) *Persons having right of succession.* The right of succession referred to in paragraph (c) of this section will pass to the identified persons in the following circumstances: ( 1 ) *Death.* The surviving spouse or child, or the executor, administrator, or other legal representative, of a deceased taxpayer;
( 2 ) *Succession of spouse.* A husband or wife succeeding to the business of his or her living spouse;
( 3 ) *Insolvency.* A receiver or trustee in bankruptcy, or an assignee for the benefit of creditors;
( 4 ) *Withdrawal from firm.* The partner or partners remaining after the death or withdrawal of a member of a partnership.
(26 U.S.C. 5733)
Exhibit 32.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT

TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Annual Report of Coach Industries Group, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-KSB for the year ended December 31, 2004, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
Report), I, Francis ODonnell, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2001, that:



The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934; and



The information contained in the Report fairly
presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



Dated: March 30, 2005



|                                          
|------------------------------------------
|/s/ Francis ODonnell                     
|Francis ODonnell, Chief Executive Officer
### SUBCHAPTER I—OFFICE OF NATIONAL DRUG CONTROL POLICY
(No. 6819

#### Mason-Barron Laboratories, Inc., Claimant, *vs.*State of Illinois, Department of Mental Health, Respondent.

*Opinion filed December 13, 1972.*

Mason-Barron Laboratories, Inc., Claimant, pro se.

William J. Scott, Attorney General; Saul R. Wexler, Assistant Attorney General, for Respondent.

Per Curiam.
Electrical Conductivity, UMHOS

Day High Low Mean

1 0 0 0

2 0 0 0

3 0 0 0

4 0 0 0

5 0 0 0

6 0 0 0

7 0 0 0

8 0 0 0

9 0 0 0

10 0 0 0

11 0 0 0

12 0 0 0

13 0 0 0

14 0 0 0

15 0 0 0

16 0 0 0

17 0 0 0

18 0 0 0

19 0 0 0

20 0 0 0

21 0 0 0

22 0 0 0

23 0 0 0

24 0 0 0

25 0 0 0

26 0 0 0

27 0 0 0

28 0 0 0

29 0 0 0

30 0 0 0

COMMENT(S):

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

Historical Archive and Report Database

Pittsburg Bottom On The Sacramento River

Period: September 2023 Run Date: 10/6/2023
§ 261.7 Effect of revised decision. A revised decision is binding unless: ( a ) The revised decision is reconsidered or appealed in accord with part 260 of this chapter;
( b ) The three-member Board reviews the revised decision; or
( c ) The revised decision is further revised consistent with this part.
NO. 07-09-0014-CV

	NO. 07-09-0015-CV

	IN THE COURT OF APPEALS

	FOR THE SEVENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

	AT AMARILLO

	PANEL C

	MARCH 31, 2009

	______________________________

	EARL COOPER, APPELLANT

	v.

	THE STATE OF TEXAS, APPELLEE

	_________________________________

	FROM THE 108TH DISTRICT COURT OF POTTER COUNTY;

	NOS. 57,019-E AND 58,020-E; HON. DOUGLAS WOODBURN, PRESIDING

	________________________________

Before QUINN, C.J., and HANCOCK and PIRTLE, JJ.

Memorandum Opinion

	On January 8, 2009, Earl Cooper filed a document entitled “‘Notic[e] of Appeal’ for post conviction psychiatric examination” in the district court.  This document was forwarded to this Court by the trial court’s clerk.  In the document, Cooper complains that the trial court failed to adhere to the deadlines required by Texas Code of Criminal Procedure article 11.07.  As such, we construe this document to be a petition for writ of mandamus seeking the issuance of a writ ordering the trial court to comply with the procedures mandated by article 11.07.

	Jurisdiction to issue writs of mandamus in criminal law matters pertaining to habeas corpus proceedings seeking relief from final felony judgments lies exclusively with the Texas Court of Criminal Appeals.  In re McAfee, 53 S.W.3d 715, 717-18 (Tex. App.–Houston [1st Dist.] 2001, orig. proceeding).  Intermediate appellate courts have no authority to issue writs of mandamus in such matters.  See id.; Tex. Crim. Proc. Code Ann. art. 11.07, § 3 (Vernon Supp. 2008).  Accordingly, Cooper's petition for writ of mandamus is dismissed for want of jurisdiction.

	Mackey K. Hancock

	Justice
COURT OF APPEALS

SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS

FORT WORTH

NO. 02-12-00175-CR

Robert Hendrickson

v.

The State of Texas

§

§

§

§

§

From County Court at Law No. 2

of Wichita County (54616-F)

May 8, 2014

Opinion by Justice Dauphinot

(nfp)

JUDGMENT

This court has considered the record on appeal in this case and holds that 

there was no error in the trial court’s judgment. It is ordered that the judgment of 

the trial court is affirmed.

SECOND DISTRICT COURT OF APPEALS 

By _/s/ Lee Ann Dauphinot______________

 Justice Lee Ann Dauphinot
I 

114TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 383 

To prohibit United States contributions to the Intergovernmental Panel on 

Climate Change, the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate 

Change, and the Green Climate Fund. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JANUARY 14, 2015 

Mr. LUETKEMEYER (for himself, Mrs. BLACK, Mr. DUNCAN of South Carolina, Mr. DUNCAN of Tennessee, Mr. GRAVES of Missouri, Mr. LONG, Mr. 

MCKINLEY, Mr. SENSENBRENNER, and Mr. BRIDENSTINE) introduced 

the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Foreign Affairs 

A BILL 

To prohibit United States contributions to the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, the United Nations 

Framework Convention on Climate Change, and the 

Green Climate Fund. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘No Tax Dollars for 

5 the United Nations’ Climate Agenda Act’’. 


tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 383 IH

1 SEC. 2. PROHIBITION ON UNITED STATES CONTRIBUTIONS 

2 TO THE INTERGOVERNMENTAL PANEL ON 

3 CLIMATE CHANGE, THE UNITED NATIONS 

4 FRAMEWORK CONVENTION ON CLIMATE 

5 CHANGE, AND THE GREEN CLIMATE FUND. 

6 (a) PROHIBITION.—Notwithstanding any other provi7 sion of law, no funds made available to any Federal de8 partment or agency may be used to make assessed or vol9 untary contributions on behalf of the United States to or 

10 for the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change 

11 (IPCC), the United Nations Framework Convention on 

12 Climate Change (UNFCCC), or the Green Climate Fund. 

13 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The prohibition on use of 

14 funds contained in subsection (a) applies with respect to 

15 funds made available for fiscal year 2016 and subsequent 

16 fiscal years. 

Æ 


tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
§ 220.37 When a child's disability determination is governed by the regulations of the Social Security Administration. ( a ) In order to receive an annuity based upon disability, a child of a deceased employee must be found disabled under the Railroad Retirement Act. However, in addition to this determination, the child must be found disabled under the Social Security Act in order to qualify for Medicare based upon disability.
( b ) Although the child of a living employee may not receive an annuity under the Railroad Retirement Act, he or she, if found disabled under the Social Security Act, may qualify for the following: ( 1 ) Inclusion as a disabled child in the employee's annuity rate under the social security overall minimum.
( 2 ) Entitlement to Medicare based upon disability.
Exhibit 15.2
  Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
  /s/ JBPB & Co. (formerly known as Grant Thornton)
§ 258.1 Hearings. ( a ) To such extent as may be necessary to determine ( 1 ) the employee status of any individual or group of individuals,
( 2 ) the employer status of any person, and
( 3 ) any other matter arising out of or necessary for the administration of the Railroad Unemployment Insurance Act and the Railroad Retirement Acts of 1935, 1937, and 1974, other than those matters specifically provided for in parts 260 and 320 of this chapter, the Board may itself or through one of its members or a designated examiner, conduct hearings, require and compel the attendance of witnesses and the production of records and documents, administer oaths, take testimony, make all pertinent investigations and findings of fact, and render decisions upon such findings.
( b ) Where the Board determines that an oral hearing is necessary to the determination of a matter before it, the Board shall notify all parties to the proceeding that a hearing will be conducted, and, if the hearing is to be before a single Board member or a designated examiner, the notice shall identify the member or examiner authorized to conduct the hearing. The Board or the person authorized to conduct the hearing shall fix a time and place for the holding of the hearing and shall notify all parties thereof.
(No. 6835

#### Clarence Brown, Claimant, *vs.*State of Illinois, Department of Labor, Respondent.

*Opinion filed October 20, 1972.*

Clarence Brown, Claimant, pro se.

William J. Scott, Attorney General; Saul R. Wexler, Assistant Attorney General, for Respondent.

Perlin, C.J.
###### Editorial Note on Part 45

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 45 appear by T.D. ATF-460, 66 FR 39093, July 27, 2001.

#### § 45.26 Delegations of the Administrator.

The regulatory authorities of the Administrator contained in this part are delegated to appropriate TTB officers. These TTB officers are specified in TTB Order 1135.45, Delegation of the Administrator's Authorities in 27 CFR Part 45, Removal of Tobacco Products and Cigarette Papers and Tubes, Without Payment of Tax, for Use of the United States. You may obtain a copy of this order by accessing the TTB Web site (*http://www.ttb.gov*) or by mailing a request to the Alcohol and Tobacco Tax and Trade Bureau, National Revenue Center, 550 Main Street, Room 1516, Cincinnati, OH 45202.

[T.D. TTB-44, 71 FR 16955, Apr. 4, 2006]