alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Partner

Case Study

Company Profile

Headquarters Location

Toledo, Ohio

Contact:

Gregg Focht

(419) 248-7469

gregg.focht@owenscorning.com

Number of Employees:

20,000

Strategy Category:

Idling reduction

Owens Corning

www.epa.gov/smartway

When Owens Corning joined SmartWay Transport Partnership in

September 2005, the company knew that to succeed as a SmartWay

Partner they would need to engage and involve their carrier base. 

To that end, on January 10, 2006, Owens Corning sent a letter to their large 

carriers to stimulate their interest and understanding of what Owens Corning

expected and why they should get involved in the SmartWay Trasnport

Partnership. This letter has become a model for other shippers interested in

recruiting their carriers into the SmartWay Transport Partnership. To date

Owens Corning has recruited over 20 of its largest carriers to become

SmartWay Partners through this letter-writing campaign.

In the past, Owens Corning has recognized their carrier fleet with an 

advertisement in Transport Topics that highlights the characteristics that make

those carriers valuable to Owens Corning and their customers. In 2006, Owens

Corning included the SmartWay Transport Partner logo in their advertisement,

further distinguishing their carriers as industry leaders working towards

greater fuel efficiency.

In 2005, Owens Corning recognized that their ability to track the amount of

time a driver was waiting at their plants needed definition and quantification.

Drivers were invited to sign in electronically when they came into proximity

of the plant and regardless of the time it took before loading began and ended.

This dwell time study has allowed Owens Corning to effectively and 

accurately capture information on each and every shipment and can report that

data by plant and carrier. Based on this extensive dwell time study Owens

Corning has begun work to establish guidelines that will reduce idling at their

plants while balancing driver safety and security.

John Gentle, Global Leader Transportation Affairs (retired), had this to say

about Owens Corning’s involvement with the SmartWay Transport Partnership:

“Owens Corning is all about conservation, safety and waste elimination. We

redefine what is possible and consistently elevate our performance and the

results of the team to employ creative processes to engage our carriers in 

support of the corporate initiatives. We believe that our strategies are 

innovative and that we have been active with the SmartWay Partnership and

will continue to take every

opportunity to raise the internal

and external consciousness of

this important program.”

Idling Reduction 

EPA420-F-07-009
children and maternity products. It also operates the *dangdang.com*marketplace program, whichallows third-party merchants to sell their products alongside products sourced by the Company.Dangdang’s nationwide fulfillment and delivery capabilities, high-quality customer service supportand scalable technology infrastructure enable it to provide a compelling online shopping experienceto customers.**Safe Harbor Statement**This announcement contains forward-looking statements. These statements are made under the “safeharbor” provisions of the U.S. Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. Theseforward-looking statements can be identified by terminology such as “will,” “expects,”“anticipates,” “future,” “intends,” “plans,” “believes,” “estimates,” “confident” and similarstatements. Statements that are not historical facts in this press release are forward-lookingstatements. Forward-looking statements involve inherent risks and uncertainties. A number offactors could cause actual results to differ materially from those contained in any forward-lookingstatement. Further information regarding these and other risks is included in our annual report onForm 20-F and other documents filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission. Dangdang does notundertake any obligation to update any forward-looking statement, except as required underapplicable law. All information provided in this press release is as of the date of this pressrelease, and Dangdang undertakes no duty to update such information, except as required underapplicable law.**For investor and media inquiries, please contact:**Maria XinIR DirectorE-commerce China Dangdang Inc.+86 (10) 8419-1896xinyi@dangdang.comCaroline StraathofIR Inside
Exhibit
32.2
 
 Multiband
Corporation
 
 Certification
Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350
 As
Adopted Pursuant to
 Section
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002








In connection with this Quarterly
Report Form 10-Q,  Multiband Corporation (the “Company”) for the
period ended September 30, 2009, I, Steven M. Bell, Chief Financial Officer of
the Company, hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





1.
            This
      Periodic Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
      15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d));
      and


2.
            The
      information contained in the Periodic Report fairly presents, in all
      material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
      the Company.





Date:
      November 16, 2009
            By:
            /s/
      Steven M. Bell
              Chief
      Financial Officer






Page
42
#### The Troy Trust Company, Respondent, v. Sayre McLeod, Appellant.

Order affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements. All concurred.
EXHIBIT32

 

CERTIFICATIONPURSUANT TO

18U.S.C. SECTION1350,

ASADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

 

Inconnection with the Quarterly Report of Your Domain.com (the"Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ended September 30, 2004, asfiled with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the"Report"), I, Anthony N. DeMint, President and Chief AccountingOfficer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adoptedpursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

-  The    Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the    Securities Exchange Act of 1934; andThe    information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material    respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

/s/Anthony N.DeMint                       

AnthonyN. DeMint

Presidentand Chief Accounting Officer

November 10,2004
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY HIGH

 3,842

 2,437

 1,593

 365

 300

 454

 356

 225

 190

 224

 314

 225

 262

 278

 304

 244

 345

 260

 228

 289

 389

 225

 229

 237

 295

 297

 327

 291

 273

 300

 257

 521

 296

 272

 196

 172

 176

 151

 149

 146

 144

 144

 144

 147

 145

 156

 162

 162

 167

 168

 173

 165

 168

 153

 174

 179

 186

 179

 188

 186

 189

 184

 1,846

 861

 522

 256

 211

 218

 196

 164

 160

 163

 167

 162

 163

 179

 185

 180

 194

 186

 184

 190

 200

 186

 183

 191

 204

 206

 213

 211

 211

 213

 204

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

MARCH 2006 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: April 4, 2006

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

PORT CHICAGO BOTTOM IN SUISUN BAY
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

DAY HIGH

 17,936

 17,100

 16,732

 16,552

 17,001

 17,563

 18,122

 18,007

 17,729

 18,435

 17,818

 16,477

 15,707

 15,700

 15,823

 15,252

 16,331

 17,276

 19,803

 19,643

 20,137

 20,496

 19,418

 18,835

 18,308

 18,069

 17,941

 18,285

 18,844

 18,956

 10,120

 8,655

 8,916

 8,376

 8,050

 8,679

 7,778

 7,992

 7,882

 7,643

 8,474

 7,581

 7,879

 7,804

 7,850

 7,658

 8,606

 7,528

 9,901

 9,771

 10,037

 9,745

 8,869

 8,425

 8,573

 8,236

 8,899

 8,949

 9,903

 10,815

 14,064

 12,690

 12,729

 12,222

 12,233

 12,494

 12,414

 12,545

 12,751

 13,281

 13,657

 12,825

 12,600

 12,423

 12,060

 11,496

 11,835

 12,445

 14,286

 14,502

 14,917

 14,995

 13,940

 13,519

 13,033

 13,321

 13,911

 14,243

 14,854

 14,732

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

NOVEMBER 2014 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: December 1, 2014

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

PITTSBURG BOTTOM ON THE SACRAMENTO RIVER
### §203. Application for license; requirements; qualifications for license

Every person whose permanent allegiance is due to the United States desiring to practice as a pharmacist in the consular districts in China shall file with the consul an application, duly verified under oath, setting forth the name and age of the applicant, the place or places at which he pursued and the time spent in the study of pharmacy, the experience which the applicant has had in compounding physicians' prescriptions under the direction of a licensed pharmacist, and the name and location of the school or college of pharmacy, if any, of which he is a graduate, and shall submit evidence sufficient to show to the satisfaction of said consul that he is of good moral character and not addicted to the use of alcoholic liquors or narcotic drugs so as to render him unfit to practice pharmacy. Applicants shall be not less than twenty-one years of age and shall have had at least four years' experience in the practice of pharmacy or shall have served three years under the instruction of a regularly licensed pharmacist, and any applicant who has been graduated from a school or college of pharmacy recognized by the proper board of his State, Territory, District of Columbia, or other possession of the United States as in good standing shall be entitled to practice upon presentation of his diploma.

(Mar. 3, 1915, ch. 74, §2, 38 Stat. 818.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

The words "now practicing as a pharmacist or," which preceded "desiring to practice" in the original text of this section, were omitted as obsolete.
(No. 7024

#### M. J. Kellner Company, Claimant, vs. State of Illinois, Department of Corrections, Respondent.

*Opinion filed January 9, 1973.*

M. J. Kellner Company, Claimant, pro se.

William J. Scott, Attorney General; William E. Webber, Assistant Attorney General, for Respondent.

Per Curiam.
/s/ Matthew R. MiddendorfMatthew R. MiddendorfChief Financial Officer and Treasurer
(Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)
14910-I3-P)

-I' \ LO -r:?R_./

ACTION: Fina! rule; request for comments.

(DOT).

SUMMARY: We arc adopting a new airworthiness directive (AD) for the products list

Airwortbiness Directives; ATR - GTE Avions de Transport Regional Model ATR42 a 0;: ~·'OOI.A "6

. 1:1"1 k"

ATR72 Airplanes

AG.ENCY: Federal AVIation Administration (FAA), Department ofTransp0l1ation

above. This AD results from mandatory continuing airworthiness infonnalion (MeAl)

RIN 2120-AA64

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

14 CFR ParI 39

IDocket No. FAA_2010_9)25; Directorate Identilier 2010-NM-026-AD;

\(p;l,ID DS-O \

Amendment 39-*****; AD 2010-**-**1

-.~

originated by all aviation authority of another country to identify and correct an unsafe 'AT!'

2-/5/; c

The contaminated nature of this gas, when used against a fire, may provide

reduced fire suppression, endangcnng the sarety of the aeroplane and its

condition on an aviation product. The MeAl describes the unsafe condition as:

* * * This Halon 1211 has subsequently been used to fill certain * * *

pOJiable fire extinguishers that are now likely to be installed in or carried

on board ATR aeroplanes.

o

"Olil'ING ,YMIIOL

- 11'1

'7rllfrj~ .H~

'f! liD ".;c,S'1olilOL

-Io!

'" "i I

''''LrTJS(;SI'IOOL

-/(;0

'/l1;\w~ "ATE

")., 1\ 10

* • • • * • *

The Civil Aviation Authority of the United Kingdom (UK) has informed

EASA [European Aviation Safety Agency] that significant quantities of

Halon 1211 gas, determi.ned to be outside the required specification, have

been supplied to the aviation industry for use in fire extinguishing

equipment. * * *
#### William King *v.*David W. Edmiston.

Statute of *Frauds—when undertaking is original.*Where, after three visits made by a physician to a son-in-law of the defendant, the latter undertook to be responsible for the payment for the services of the former, and services were subsequently rendered under this promise, the defendant’s promise is an original undertaking as to the subsequent visits, and he is liable for the reasonable value of such services, but not for services rendered before his undertaking.

Appeal from the Circuit Court of De Witt county; the Hon. Lyman Lacey, Judge, presiding.

Messrs. Sweeney, Fuller & Graham, for the appellant.

Messrs. Moore & Warner, for the appellee.

Mr. Justice Breese

delivered the opinion of the Court:

This was a suit, brought before a justice of the peace of De Witt county, by David W. Edmiston, plaintiff, and against William King, defendant, to recover for services, as a physician and surgeon, rendered by the plaintiff to one William Bowman, the son-in-law of .defendant, and such proceedings were had as to result in a judgment for the defendant. The plaintiff appealed to the circuit court, and a trial there had by the court, without a jury. The court found for the plaintiff, and denied a motion for a new trial, and rendered a judgment against the defendant for one hundred dollars, according to the finding. To reverse this judgment the defendant appeals.

It is insisted by appellant, that this record does not disclose an original undertaking on the part of appellant to pay for these services rendered by appellee to William Bowman, and no liability is established on appellant to pay this claim.

It will be seen, the claim was originally for one hundred and twenty-nine dollars, and the judgment was for one hundred dollars—part thereof.

*258There was much testimony heard by the court on both sides, and, on full consideration of it, there was enough to sustain the finding.

It is in proof, the bill presented, amounting to one hundred and twenty-nine dollars, was a reasonable bill for all the visits and services rendered. There is no sufficient proof that appellant offered to become responsible for these services until three visits had been made, as they were made without his knowledge or procurement. For all subsequent visits and services-by appellee, we think there is abundant proof that appellant undertook to be responsible. It was an original undertaking, on his part, and the recovery is for the value of those visits only.

We perceive no reason for disturbing the finding and judgment of the court, sufficient having been shown to establish a liability against appellant for the amount of the judgment, and the same must, be affirmed.

*Judgment affirmed.*
§ 228.2 Tier I and tier II annuity components. ( a ) *Tier I annuity component.* The Tier I annuity component is generally the amount that would have been payable under the Social Security Act if all of the employee's earnings after 1936 under both the railroad retirement system and the social security system had been creditable under the Social Security Act.
( b ) *Tier II annuity component.* The tier II annuity component is the portion of the survivor's annuity which is based on an employee's railroad earnings only. The tier II component of an annuity described in this part is a specified percentage of the employee's actual or anticipated tier II annuity component.
**EXHIBIT 99.31** 

 

**CONSENT OF NEIL BURNS**

 

United States Securities and Exchange Commission

Gentlemen:

In connection with Silver Wheaton Corporation’s (the “Company”) Annual Report on Form 40-F for the year ended December 31, 2008 (the “Annual Report”), I, Neil R. Burns, M.Sc., P.Geo., Director of Geology (Company), hereby consent to the inclusion in, or incorporation by reference into, and the use of my name in connection with the preparation of the following            documents/reports:

 

| 1.     | Resource and reserve estimates of the Yauliyacu Mine;                                                            |
|--------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   |                                                                                                             |
| 2.     | Technical report dated March 25, 2009, entitled “Resource and Reserve Update, Yauliyacu Mine, Peru”; |
|   |                                                                                                             |
| 3.     | The Annual Report.                                                                                               |

 

Date: March 30, 2009

|   | Yours truly,/s/ Neil Burns                                                                                                                                         |
|--------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   | Name: Neil Burns, M.Sc., P.Geo. Title:   Director of Geology,            Silver Wheaton Corp |
EXHIBIT 31.1





CERTIFICATION
OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF
2002








I,
William J. Worthen, Chief Executive Officer of Alsius Corporation (the
“Company”), certify that:




1. I
have reviewed this Annual Report on Form 10-K of the Company;




2. Based
on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material
fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in
light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading
with respect to the period covered by this report;




3. Based
on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information
included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial
condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and
for, the periods presented in this report.




4. The
registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and
maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act
Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:




(a)
Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure
controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that
material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated
subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly
during the period in which this report is being prepared;




(b)
Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness
of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered
by this report based on such evaluation; and




(c)
Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over
financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal
quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report)
that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the
registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and




5. The
registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most
recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the
registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of
directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):




(a)
All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation
of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to
adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and
report financial information; and




(b)
Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees
who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial
reporting.




/s/
      William J. WorthenWilliam
      J. Worthen,Chief
      Executive Officer


Date:
March 13, 2008
Editorial Note on Part 22
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 22 appear by T.D. ATF-435, 66 FR 5476, Jan. 19, 2001 and T.D. ATF-463 and T.D. ATF-462, 66 FR 42733, 42736, Aug. 15, 2001.

§ 22.122 Losses in transit. ( a ) *Reporting losses.* Upon discovering any loss of tax-free alcohol while in transit, the carrier shall immediately inform the consignee, in writing, of the facts and circumstances relating to the loss. In the case of theft, the carrier shall also immediately notify the consignee's appropriate TTB officer of the facts and circumstances relating to the loss.
( b ) *Recording losses.* At the time the shipment or report of loss is received, the consignee shall determine the quantity of tax-free alcohol lost. The consignee shall note the quantity lost on the receiving document and attach all relevant information to the record of receipt, prescribed in § 22.113. For the purpose of maintaining the records prescribed in subpart M of this part, receipts of tax-free alcohol shall only include the quantity actually received.
( c ) *Claims.* A claim for allowances of losses of tax-free alcohol shall, as prescribed in § 22.125, be filed: ( 1 ) If the quantity lost in transit exceeds 1 percent of the total quantity shipped and is more than 5 proof gallons, the consignee shall file a claim for allowance of the entire quantity lost; or
( 2 ) If the loss was due to theft or other unlawful removal, the consignee shall file a claim for allowances of the entire quantity lost, regardless of the quantity or percentage involved.
(Reporting approved by the Office of Management and Budget under control number 1512-0335; recordkeeping approved by the Office of Management and Budget under control number 1512-0334)
# C_2012038EN.01000101.xml

| 11.2.2012 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 38/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

11.2.2012

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 38/1

---

Decisions in the context of the monitoring of the implementation of decisions regarding restructuring and liquidation aid for financial institutions

(Text with EEA relevance)

2012/C 38/01

| Date of adoption of the decision | 27.7.2011 |
| --- | --- |
| Reference number of the aid | SA.29833 (MC 11/09) |
| Member State | Belgium |
| Title (and/or name of the beneficiary) | Monitoring of KBC — replacement own contribution measures, wind-down of Romstal and extension deadline divestment KBL |
| Type of decision | New decision related to the following Commission decision: MC 11/09 |
| Content | Adaptation of structural requirements: swap of a business to be divested, Adaptation of the schedule or conditions for the repayment of State aid, Other adaptation |
| Other information | — |

Date of adoption of the decision

27.7.2011

Reference number of the aid

SA.29833 (MC 11/09)

Member State

Belgium

Title (and/or name of the beneficiary)

Monitoring of KBC — replacement own contribution measures, wind-down of Romstal and extension deadline divestment KBL

Type of decision

New decision related to the following Commission decision: MC 11/09

Content

Adaptation of structural requirements: swap of a business to be divested, Adaptation of the schedule or conditions for the repayment of State aid, Other adaptation

Other information

—

The authentic text(s) of the decision, from which all confidential information has been removed, can be found at:

http://ec.europa.eu/community_law/state_aids/state_aids_texts_en.htm

---
### §855. Alternative fine

In lieu of a fine otherwise authorized by this part, a defendant who derives profits or other proceeds from an offense may be fined not more than twice the gross profits or other proceeds.

(Pub. L. 91–513, title II, §415, as added Pub. L. 98–473, title II, §2302, Oct. 12, 1984, 98 Stat. 2193.)