Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 75 / Tuesday, April 19, 2011 / Notices 21931 

1Public Law 111–203 (July 21, 2010). 

2 15 U.S.C. 7262. 

3 17 CFR 240.12b–2. 

4 15 U.S.C. 78a et seq. 

5Release No. 33–9142 (Sept. 15, 2010) [75 FR 

57385]. 

staff finds that the proposed action 

would not have disproportionately high 

and adverse human health and 

environmental effects on minority and 

low-income populations residing in the 

vicinity of NRCR. 

Environmental Impacts of the 

Alternatives to the Proposed Action 

As an alternative to license renewal, 

the NRC staff considered denying the 

proposed action. If the NRC denied the 

application for license renewal, reactor 

operations would cease and 

decommissioning would be required. 

The NRC notes that, even with a 

renewed license, the NRCR will 

eventually be decommissioned, at 

which time the environmental effects of 

decommissioning would occur. 

Decommissioning would be conducted 

in accordance with an NRC-approved 

decommissioning plan which would 

require a separate environmental review 

under 10 CFR 51.21. Cessation of reactor 

operations would reduce or eliminate 

radioactive effluents and emissions. 

However, as previously discussed in 

this environmental assessment, 

radioactive effluents and emissions from 

reactor operations constitute a small 

fraction of the applicable regulatory 

limits. Therefore, the environmental 

impacts of license renewal and the 

denial of the application for license 

renewal would be similar. In addition, 

denying the application for license 

renewal would eliminate the benefits of 

teaching opportunities, research, and 

services provided by the NRCR. 

Alternative Use of Resources 

The proposed action does not involve 

the use of any different resources or 

significant quantities of resources 

beyond those previously considered in 

the issuance of Amendment No. 10 to 

Facility Operating License No. R–76 for 

the Washington State University 

Nuclear Research Center Reactor dated 

August 11, 1982, which renewed the 

Facility Operating License for a period 

of 20 years. 

Agencies and Persons Consulted 

In accordance with the agency’s stated 

policy, the staff consulted with the State 

Historic Preservation Officer between 

May 13 and October 21, 2010, and the 

State Liaison Officer between May 13 

and December 2, 2010, regarding the 

environmental impact of the proposed 

action. The consultation involved a 

thorough explanation of the 

environmental review, the details of this 

environmental assessment, and the 

NRC’s findings. The State officials 

stated that they understood the NRC 

review and had no comments regarding 

the proposed action. 

III. Finding of No Significant Impact 

On the basis of the environmental 

assessment, the NRC staff concludes 

that the proposed action will not have 

a significant effect on the quality of the 

human environment. Accordingly, the 

NRC staff has determined not to prepare 

an environmental impact statement for 

the proposed action. 

For further details with respect to the 

proposed action, see the licensee’s 

application dated June 24, 2002 

(ML092390202), as supplemented by 

letters dated August 15, 2007 

(ML072410493), June 13, 2008 

(ML082380266), and April 7, 2010 

(ML101031097). Documents may be 

examined, and/or copied for a fee, at the 

NRC’s Public Document Room (PDR), 

located at One White Flint North, 11555 

Rockville Pike (first floor), Rockville, 

Maryland. Publicly available records 

will be accessible electronically from 

the Agencywide Documents Access and 

Management System (ADAMS) Public 

Electronic Reading Room on the NRC 

Web site http://www.nrc.gov/readingrm/adams.html. Persons who do not 

have access to ADAMS or who 

encounter problems in accessing the 

documents located in ADAMS should 

contact the NRC PDR Reference staff at 

1–800–397–4209, or 301–415–4737, or 

send an e-mail to pdr@nrc.gov. 

Dated at Rockville, Maryland this 8th day 

of April, 2011. 

For the Nuclear Regulatory Commission. 

Jessie F. Quichocho, 

Chief, Research and Test Reactors Licensing 

Branch, Division of Policy and Rulemaking, 

Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation. 

[FR Doc. 2011–9436 Filed 4–18–11; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 7590–01–P 

RAILROAD RETIREMENT BOARD 

Sunshine Act; Notice of Public Meeting 

Notice is hereby given that the 

Railroad Retirement Board will hold a 

meeting on April 27, 2011, 10 a.m. at 

the Board’s meeting room on the 8th 

floor of its headquarters building, 844 

North Rush Street, Chicago, Illinois 

60611. The agenda for this meeting 

follows: 

Executive Committee Reports 

The entire meeting will be open to the 

public. The person to contact for more 

information is Beatrice Ezerski, 

Secretary to the Board, Phone No. 312– 

751–4920. 

Dated: April 14, 2011. 

Beatrice Ezerski, 

Secretary to the Board. 

[FR Doc. 2011–9537 Filed 4–15–11; 11:15 am] 

BILLING CODE 7905–01–P 

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE 

COMMISSION 

Submission for OMB Review; 

Comment Request 

Upon Written Request, Copies Available 

From: Securities and Exchange 

Commission, Office of Investor 

Education and Advocacy, 

Washington, DC 20549. 

Requested Change: 

Form 10–K, OMB Control No. 3235–0063; 

SEC File No. 270–48. 

Form 20–F, OMB Control No. 3235–0288; 

SEC File No. 270–156. 

Section 989G of the Dodd-Frank Wall 

Street Reform and Consumer Protection 

Act of 2010 1 (the ‘‘Act’’) provides that 

Section 404(b) of the Sarbanes-Oxley 

Act 2 does not apply to any audit report 

prepared for an issuer that is neither an 

accelerated filer nor a large accelerated 

filer as defined in Rule 12b–2 3 under 

the Securities Exchange Act.4 Notice is 

hereby given that, pursuant to the 

Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 

(44 U.S.C. 3501–3520), the Securities 

and Exchange Commission (the 

‘‘Commission’’) has submitted to the 

Office of Management and Budget the 

request for approval of extension of the 

previously approved collection of 

information discussed below. 

In a separate release,5 the Commission 

amended its rules in light of the Act, 

which amends Section 404 of the 

Sarbanes-Oxley Act. The Commission 

had previously estimated the burden of 

complying with Section 404(b) of the 

Sarbanes-Oxley Act assuming that all 

filers of Forms 10–K and 20–F would 

file an auditor’s attestation report. The 

filers that were included in the estimate 

but are no longer subject to the 404 

requirement are sometimes referred to 

as ‘‘non-accelerated filers.’’ 

Form 10–K sets forth the disclosure 

requirements for annual reports filed by 

issuers under the Securities Exchange 

Act. Form 20–F sets forth the disclosure 

requirements for annual reports and 

registration statements filed by foreign 

private issuers under the Securities 

Exchange Act, as well as many of the 

mstockstill on DSKH9S0YB1PROD with NOTICES

21932 Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 75 / Tuesday, April 19, 2011 / Notices 

6For further information on the determination of 

our estimates, see Release No. 33–8238 (June 5, 

2003) [68 FR 36636]. 

1 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1). 

2 17 CFR 240.19b–4. 

3See Securities and Exchange Act Release No. 

63909 (February 15, 2011), 76 FR 9838 (February 

22, 2011) (‘‘Notice’’). 

4 17 CFR 200.30–3(a)(12). 

1 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1). 

2 17 CFR 240.19b–4. 

disclosure requirements for registration 

statements filed by foreign private 

issuers under the Securities Act. 

Based on the number of nonaccelerated filers that filed an annual 

report in 2009, we estimate that 

approximately 4,400 annual reports on 

Form 10–K and approximately 285 

annual reports on Form 20–F are filed 

annually by non-accelerated filers. The 

current burden estimates for Form 10– 

K and Form 20–F attribute 0.5 burden 

hours per issuer for filing the auditor 

attestation report, including the burden 

attributed to the related disclosure in 

the annual report, and do not include 

any burden attributed to the audit 

work.6 Consistent with the burden 

estimates for these forms, that estimate 

is then split 75% and 25% between 

internal staff and external professionals 

for Form 10–K, and 25% and 75% 

between internal staff and external 

professionals for Form 20–F. Both 

estimates assume an hourly rate of $400 

for external professionals. Accordingly, 

we are reducing the aggregate burden 

estimate by 1,650 hours of internal staff 

time and $220,000 for external 

professional services for Form 10–K, 

and 36 hours of internal staff time and 

$42,750 for external professional 

services for Form 20–F. 

The information collections 

requirements related to Forms 10–K and 

20–F are mandatory. There is no 

mandatory retention period for the 

information disclosed, and the 

information disclosed is made publicly 

available on the EDGAR filing system. 

An agency may not conduct or sponsor, 

and a person is not required to respond 

to, a collection of information unless it 

displays a currently valid OMB control 

number. 

The public may view the background 

documentation for this information 

collection at the following Web site, 

http: www.reginfo.gov. Comments 

should be directed to: (i) Desk Officer 

for the Securities and Exchange 

Commission, Office of Information and 

Regulatory Affairs, Office of 

Management and Budget, Room 10102, 

New Executive Office Building, 

Washington, DC 20503, or by sending an 

e-mail to: 

Shagufta_Ahmed@omb.eop.gov; and (ii) 

Thomas Bayer, Chief Information 

Officer, Securities and Exchange 

Commission, c/o Remi Pavlik-Simon, 

6432 General Green Way, Alexandria, 

VA 22312 or send an e-mail to: 

PRA_Mailbox@sec.gov. Comments must 

be submitted to OMB within 30 days of 

this notice. 

Please direct your written comments 

to Thomas Bayer, Chief Information 

Officer, Securities and Exchange 

Commission, c/o Remi Pavlik-Simon, 

6432 General Green Way, Alexandria, 

VA 22312; or send an e-mail to: PRAMailbox@sec.gov. 

April 11, 2011. 

Elizabeth M. Murphy, 

Secretary. 

[FR Doc. 2011–9414 Filed 4–18–11; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 8011–01–P 

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE 

COMMISSION 

[Release No. 34–64226A; File No. SR– 

FINRA–2011–005] 

Self-Regulatory Organizations; 

Financial Industry Regulatory 

Authority, Inc.; Order Granting 

Approval of a Proposed Rule Change 

Relating to Promissory Note 

Proceedings; Correction 

April 13, 2011. 

Need for Correction 

In FR Document No. 2011–8897 

beginning on page 20741 as published 

on Wednesday, April 13, 2011, the 

Commission issued Release No. 34– 

64226, an order approving the proposed 

rule change by the Financial Industry 

Regulatory Authority, Inc. (‘‘FINRA’’) to 

amend Rule 13806 of the Code of 

Arbitration Procedure for Industry 

Disputes (‘‘Industry Code’’). Commission 

staff discovered that a statement in the 

introduction section of that order 

mischaracterized the nature of the rule 

change which was described accurately 

in the remainder of the order. The staff 

believes this mischaracterization was 

the result of an editing error. 

This correction does not substantively 

amend the Commission’s approval 

order. The sole purpose of this 

correction is to rectify the error in the 

introduction section and alleviate any 

potential confusion. The introduction 

section of this approval order is being 

republished with the correction. 

Correction of Publication 

Accordingly, the Introduction of the 

approval order is republished to correct 

a statement therein, as follows: 

I. Introduction 

On February 4, 2011, the Financial 

Industry Regulatory Authority, Inc. 

(‘‘FINRA’’) filed with the Securities and 

Exchange Commission (‘‘Commission’’), 

pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the 

Securities Exchange Act of 1934 

(‘‘Act’’),1 and Rule 19b–4 thereunder,2 a 

proposed rule change to amend Rule 

13806 of the Code of Arbitration 

Procedure for Industry Disputes 

(‘‘Industry Code’’) to provide that FINRA 

will appoint a chair-qualified public 

arbitrator to a panel resolving a 

promissory note dispute instead of a 

chair-qualified public arbitrator also 

qualified to resolve a statutory 

discrimination claim. The proposed rule 

change was published for comment in 

the Federal Register on February 22, 

2011.3 The Commission did not receive 

any comments on the proposal. This 

order approves the proposed change. 

For the Commission, by the Division of 

Trading and Markets, pursuant to delegated 

authority.4

Cathy H. Ahn, 

Deputy Secretary. 

[FR Doc. 2011–9413 Filed 4–18–11; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 8011–01–P 

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE 

COMMISSION 

[Release No. 34–64299; File No. SR–NYSE– 

2011–14] 

Self-Regulatory Organizations; New 

York Stock Exchange LLC; Notice of 

Filing and Immediate Effectiveness of 

Proposed Rule Change To Alter Listing 

Fees Applicable to Debt Securities and 

Structured Products 

April 14, 2011. 

Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the 

Securities Exchange Act of 1934 

(‘‘Act’’) 1 and Rule 19b–4 thereunder,2

notice is hereby given that, on April 11, 

2011, the New York Stock Exchange 

LLC (‘‘NYSE’’ or the ‘‘Exchange’’) filed 

with the Securities and Exchange 

Commission (the ‘‘Commission’’) the 

proposed rule change as described in 

Items I and II below, which Items have 

been prepared by the Exchange. The 

Commission is publishing this notice to 

solicit comments on the proposed rule 

change from interested persons. 

I. Self-Regulatory Organization’s 

Statement of the Terms of Substance of 

the Proposed Rule Change 

The Exchange proposes to amend 

Section 902.08 of the Listed Company 

Manual (the ‘‘Manual’’) to alter its listing 

fees applicable to debt securities and 

mstockstill on DSKH9S0YB1PROD with NOTICES