alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
### §§4601, 4602. Repealed. Pub. L. 100–297, title I, §1003(e), Apr. 28, 1988, 102 Stat. 293

Section 4601, Pub. L. 99–570, title IV, §4102, Oct. 27, 1986, 100 Stat. 3207–125, related to Congressional findings.

Section 4602, Pub. L. 99–570, title IV, §4103, Oct. 27, 1986, 100 Stat. 3207–125, related to purpose of chapter.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date of Repeal

Repeal effective July 1, 1988, see section 6303 of Pub. L. 100–297, set out as an Effective Date of 1988 Amendment note under section 1071 of this title.

#### Short Title

Pub. L. 99–570, title IV, §4101, Oct. 27, 1986, 100 Stat. 3207–125, which provided that subtitle B [§§4101 to 4144] of title IV of Pub. L. 99–570 was to be cited as the "Drug-Free Schools and Communities Act of 1986", was repealed by Pub. L. 100–297, title I, §1003(e), Apr. 28, 1988, 102 Stat. 293.

#### White House Conference for a Drug Free America

Pub. L. 99–570, title I, subtitle S (§1931 et seq.), Oct. 27, 1986, 100 Stat. 3207–56, as amended by Pub. L. 100–138, Oct. 23, 1987, 101 Stat. 820, established the White House Conference for a Drug Free America, provided for its purpose, responsibilities, participants, authorization of appropriations, and required a final report to be submitted not later than July 31, 1988, with the President to report annually to Congress for three years thereafter on the status and implementation of the findings and recommendations of the Conference.

#### **Executive Documents**

#### Executive Order No. 12595

Ex. Ord. No. 12595, May 5, 1987, 52 F.R. 17383, established and set forth the functions of the White House Conference for a Drug Free America.
§ 219.7 How the Board decides what is convincing evidence. When the Board receives evidence, a Board representative examines it to see if it is convincing evidence. If it is, no other evidence is needed. In deciding whether the evidence is convincing, the Board representative decides whether— ( a ) The information contained in the evidence was given by a person in a position to know the facts;
( b ) There was any reason to give false information when the evidence was created;
( c ) The information contained in the evidence was given under oath, or in the presence of witnesses, or with the knowledge that there was a penalty for giving false information;
( d ) The evidence was created at the time the event took place or shortly after;
( e ) The evidence has been altered or has any erasures on it; and
( f ) The information contained in the evidence agrees with other available evidence, including existing Board records.
#### Lilly Harris, Appellant, v. C. B. E. Realty Corp., Respondent.

In an action to recover damages for personal injuries suffered by plaintiff when she applied a lighted match to the burner of a gas range in her apartment, judgment entered on the verdict of a jury in favor of defendant, unanimously affirmed, with costs. Ho opinion. Present — Lewis, P. J., Johnston, Adel, Sneed and Wenzel, JJ.
Exhibit 31.5

CERTIFICATIONS

I, George M. Longest, Jr., certify that:

1. I
have reviewed this Amendment No. 2 to Annual Report on Form 10-K/A for the year ended December 31, 2009 of Community Bankers Trust Corporation; and

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the
statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report.



/s/ George M. Longest, Jr.George M. Longest, Jr.
President and Chief Executive Officer


Date: May 28, 2010
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND

CHIEF
FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE

SARBANES-OXLEY ACT

The certification set forth below is being submitted in connection with Warner Chilcott plcs Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year
ended December 31, 2009 (the Annual Report) for the purpose of complying with Rule 13a-14(b) or Rule 15d-14(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the Exchange Act) and Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of
the United States Code.

Roger M. Boissonneault, the Chief Executive Officer and Paul Herendeen, the Chief Financial Officer
of Warner Chilcott plc, each certifies that, to the best of his knowledge:



| | 1. | the Annual Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Exchange Act; and
| | -- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | the information contained in the Annual Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Warner Chilcott plc.
| | -- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Date: March 1, 2010



/s/ Roger M. BoissonneaultName: Roger M. Boissonneault Title: President and Chief Executive Officer




/s/ Paul HerendeenName: Paul Herendeen Title:
Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer


A signed original of this written statement
required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to
Warner Chilcott plc and will be retained by Warner Chilcott plc and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
Exhibit
32.1





CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Annual Report of
SRKP 2, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31,
2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof
(the "Report"), I, Richard A. Rappaport, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss.
1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to
my knowledge:





(1) The
Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2) The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





/s/
      Richard A. RappaportRichard
      A. Rappaport
                      Principal
      Executive Officer
                      March
      23, 2010
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

DAY HIGH

 22,260

 22,453

 22,665

 23,471

 24,176

 24,178

 24,648

 24,213

 24,168

 24,833

 23,809

 22,974

 23,853

 24,253

 24,145

 23,585

 24,569

 24,872

 25,564

 26,746

 27,472

 28,748

 28,232

 26,835

 26,335

 24,754

 24,254

 23,215

 25,015

 22,219

 13,840

 14,045

 14,588

 15,023

 15,757

 14,940

 14,986

 14,524

 15,039

 14,736

 15,458

 14,524

 13,768

 13,080

 12,884

 13,443

 15,838

 17,055

 17,202

 18,726

 18,835

 17,937

 16,905

 15,842

 15,731

 14,604

 13,576

 13,564

 14,083

 14,349

 19,079

 19,106

 19,256

 19,714

 19,923

 19,806

 20,092

 19,786

 20,107

 20,791

 20,098

 19,948

 19,033

 19,530

 19,445

 20,352

 20,828

 21,491

 21,788

 22,522

 23,093

 23,493

 22,897

 22,267

 21,355

 20,270

 20,155

 19,710

 20,761

 18,352

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

NOVEMBER 2018 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: December 10, 2018

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

PORT CHICAGO TOP IN SUISUN BAY
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY ELEV

 1,048.27

 1,048.06

 1,047.81

 1,047.59

 1,047.33

 1,047.04

 1,046.94

 1,046.63

 1,046.43

 1,046.22

 1,046.04

 1,045.83

 1,045.69

 1,045.52

 1,045.28

 1,045.05

 1,044.78

 1,044.60

 1,044.46

 1,044.32

 1,044.19

 1,043.99

 1,043.76

 1,043.52

 1,043.35

 1,043.18

 1,042.93

 1,042.70

 1,042.55

 1,042.52

 1,042.26

 1,956.1

 1,953.8

 1,951.0

 1,948.6

 1,945.8

 1,942.6

 1,941.6

 1,938.2

 1,936.0

 1,933.7

 1,931.8

 1,929.5

 1,928.0

 1,926.2

 1,923.6

 1,921.1

 1,918.2

 1,916.2

 1,914.7

 1,913.2

 1,911.8

 1,909.7

 1,907.2

 1,904.6

 1,902.8

 1,901.0

 1,898.3

 1,895.8

 1,894.2

 1,893.9

 1,891.1

STORAGE

-1.4

-2.3

-2.7

-2.4

-2.8

-3.2

-1.1

-3.4

-2.2

-2.3

-2.0

-2.3

-1.5

-1.8

-2.6

-2.5

-2.9

-1.9

-1.5

-1.5

-1.4

-2.2

-2.5

-2.6

-1.8

-1.8

-2.7

-2.5

-1.6

-0.3

-2.8

CHANGE

1,093

894

836

963

834

931

906

804

911

1,008

1,022

1,024

951

1,097

723

852

878

884

1,295

1,161

1,202

783

846

1,106

1,239

1,083

1,031

1,248

920

960

1,404

INFLOW

 1,668

 1,920

 2,087

 2,064

 2,149

 2,400

 1,331

 2,377

 1,882

 2,048

 1,853

 2,016

 1,560

 1,870

 1,899

 1,959

 2,213

 1,758

 1,930

 1,786

 1,765

 1,726

 1,956

 2,250

 2,000

 1,844

 2,245

 2,358

 1,595

 987

 2,659

POWER

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

SPILL

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

OUTLET

 141

 131

 123

 106

 113

 123

 123

 123

 123

 109

 154

 154

 154

 154

 133

 147

 133

 105

 126

 136

 143

 143

 136

 156

 160

 160

 139

 132

 135

 135

 149

C.F.S.

 .40

 .37

 .35

 .30

 .32

 .35

 .35

 .35

 .35

 .31

 .44

 .44

 .44

 .44

 .38

 .42

 .38

 .30

 .36

 .39

 .41

 .41

 .39

 .45

 .46

 .46

 .40

 .38

 .39

 .39

 .43

INCHES

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .01

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

PRECIP

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

JULY 2000 NEW MELONES LAKE DAILY OPERATIONS RUN DATE: August 21, 2000

IN LAKE

EVAPORATION

INCHES

C.F.S.

COMPUTED*

1000 ACRE-FEET

RELEASE - C.F.S.

TOTALS -66.5 30,889 60,155 0 0 4,199 12.01 .01

ACRE-FEET -66,500 61,268 119,317 0 0 8,329

COMMENTS:

* COMPUTED INFLOW IS THE SUM OF CHANGE IN STORAGE, RELEASES AND EVAPORATION.

SUMMARY

RELEASE (ACRE-FEET)

POWER 119,317

SPILL 0

OUTLET

TOTAL

 0

 119,317

PRECIPITATION

THIS MONTH =

TO DATE =

 .01

JULY 1, 2000 .01

 1,957.5

Table 13
§ 220.128 Age as a vocational factor. ( a ) *General.* ( 1 ) *Age* refers to how old the claimaint is (chronological age) and the extent to which his or her age affects his or her ability to— ( i ) Adapt to a new work situation; and
( ii ) Do work in competition with others.
( 2 ) In determining disability, the Board does not consider age alone. The Board must also consider the claimant's residual functional capacity, education, and work experience. If the claimant is unemployed because of his or her age and can still do a significant number of jobs which exist in the national economy, the Board will find that he or she is not disabled. Appendix 2 of this part explains in detail how the Board considers age as a vocational factor. However, the Board does not apply these age categories mechanically in a borderline situation.
( b ) *Younger person.* If the claimant is under age 50, the Board generally does not consider that his or her age will seriously affect the ability to adapt to a new work situation. In some circumstances, the Board considers age 45 a handicap in adapting to a new work setting (see Rule 201.17 in appendix 2 of this part).
( c ) *Person approaching advanced age.* If the claimant is closely approaching advanced age (50-54), the Board considers that the claimant's age, along with a severe impairment and limited work experience, may seriously affect the claimant's ability to adjust to a significant number of jobs in the national economy.
( d ) *Person of advanced age.* The Board considers that advanced age (55 or over) is the point at which age significantly affects the claimant's ability to do substantial gainful activity. ( 1 ) If the claimant is severly impaired and of advanced age, and he or she cannot do medium work (see § 220.132), the claimant may not be able to work unless he or she has skills that can be used in less demanding jobs which exist in significant numbers in the national economy.
( 2 ) If the claimant is close to retirement age (60-64) and has a severe impairment, the Board will not consider him or her able to adjust to sedentary or light work unless the claimant has skills which are highly marketable.
A-AA+Skip to content

                  - Home
                  - Compendium Statistics
                  - Event
                  - Archives
                  - Glossary
                  - Help
                  - Contact
                  - Research on Disability

Annual Disability Statistics Compendium

              - Home /
              - Archives /
              - 2012 Compendium Statistics /
              - 2012 Medicaid and Medicare /
              - 2012 10.1 Medicaid—Medicaid Payments by Disability Status

## Table 10.1: Medicaid—Medicaid Payments by Disability Status (in millions of dollars): Fiscal Year 2009

----

----

 

----

#### 2012 Disability Compendium

                        - Home
                        - Compendium Statistics                           - Population and Prevelance
                          - Employment
                          - Time Trend Population Statistics
                          - Poverty
                          - Earnings
                          - Veterans
                          - Health Insurance Coverage
                          - Health
                          - Social Security Administration Programs
                          - Medicaid and Medicare
                          - Special Education
                          - Vocational Rehabilitation
                          - Federal Government Spending and Employment
                          - International Disability Statistics
                          - Population Statistics: Disability Type
                        - Event
                        - Archives                           - 2012 Compendium Statistics
                        - Glossary
                        - Help
                        - Contact
                        - Research on Disability

#### Funding for this project is made possible by:

 The Research and Training Center on Disability Statistics and Demographics (StatsRRTC), which is funded by the U.S. Department of Education, National Institute for Disability and Rehabilitation Research, under cooperative agreements H133B080012.

#### Stay Connected

**Institute on Disability**10 West Edge Drive, Suite 101Durham, NH 03824603.862.4320 | relay: 711 | [email protected]www.iod.unh.edu

© 2013. Institute on Disability.University of New Hampshire.
§ 1002.44 Does USERRA cover an independent contractor? ( a ) No. USERRA does not provide protections for an independent contractor.
( b ) In deciding whether an individual is an independent contractor, the following factors need to be considered: ( 1 ) The extent of the employer's right to control the manner in which the individual's work is to be performed;
( 2 ) The opportunity for profit or loss that depends upon the individual's managerial skill;
( 3 ) Any investment in equipment or materials required for the individual's tasks, or his or her employment of helpers;
( 4 ) Whether the service the individual performs requires a special skill;
( 5 ) The degree of permanence of the individual's working relationship; and,
( 6 ) Whether the service the individual performs is an integral part of the employer's business.
( c ) No single one of these factors is controlling, but all are relevant to determining whether an individual is an employee or an independent contractor.
ex_126969.htm


Exhibit 10.03


 


Second Amendment to 


EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT


 


This Second Amendment (“Amendment”) to the Employment Agreement by and between Natural Alternatives International, Inc., a Delaware corporation (“Company”), and Michael E. Fortin (“Employee”), dated effective as of October 1, 2015, and previously amended effective September 1, 2016 (“Agreement”), is made and entered into effective as of July 1, 2018. Unless otherwise defined herein, capitalized terms shall have the meanings given them in the Agreement.


 


1.      Pursuant to Section 4(a) of the Agreement, Employee’s base salary is hereby increased to Two Hundred Twenty-Five Thousand dollars ($225,000) per year.


 


2.     Except as set forth herein, all other terms and conditions of the Agreement shall remain in full force and effect.


 


IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned have executed this Amendment as of September 20, 2018.


 


 


EMPLOYEE


 


 


/s/ Michael E. Fortin                    


Michael E. Fortin


 


 


COMPANY


 


Natural Alternatives International, Inc.,


a Delaware corporation


 


 


/s/ Kenneth E. Wolf                    


Kenneth E. Wolf, President
§ 225.12 Combined Earnings Dual Benefit PIA. ( a ) *General.* The Combined Earnings Dual Benefit PIA is used in computing the employee vested dual benefit when the employee meets certain eligibility requirements as described in part 216 of this chapter. The Combined Earnings Dual Benefit PIA is also used in computing the employee's tier II annuity component when the employee becomes entitled to a vested dual benefit. This PIA is determined under section 215 of the Social Security Act as in effect on December 31, 1974. Railroad and social security earnings after 1950 (or after 1936, if applicable) and through December 31, 1974, or the last year of railroad service before 1974 are included in the calculation of this PIA.
( b ) *Employee insured on own wage record on December 31, 1974.* Railroad and social security earnings after 1950 (or after 1936, if a higher PIA would result) and through 1974 are used in computing the Combined Earnings Dual Benefit PIA if the employee— ( 1 ) Had at least 25 years of railroad service before January 1, 1975; or
( 2 ) Had at least 10 years of railroad service as of December 31, 1974, and worked in the railroad industry anytime during calendar year 1974; or
( 3 ) Had at least 10 years of railroad service as of December 31, 1974, and had a current connection with the railroad industry (as described in part 216 of this chapter) on December 31, 1974, or when the employee annuity began.
( c ) *Employee insured on own wage record in last year of railroad service.* Railroad and social security earnings after 1950 (or after 1936, if a higher PIA would result) and through December 31 of the year before 1974 in which the employee last worked in railroad service are used in computing the Combined Earnings Dual Benefit PIA if the employee— ( 1 ) Had at least 10 but less than 25 years of railroad service through December 31, 1974; and
( 2 ) Did not work in the railroad industry during 1974; and
( 3 ) Did not have a current connection with the railroad industry (as described in part 216 of this chapter) on December 31, 1974, or when the employee annuity began.
###### Editorial Note on Part 71

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 71 appear by T.D. ATF-414, 64 FR 49084, Sept. 10, 1999and T.D. ATF-463, 66 FR 42734, 42735, Aug. 15, 2001.

#### § 71.49 Applications for basic permits.

If, upon examination of any application (including a renewal application) for a basic permit, the appropriate TTB officer has reason to believe that the applicant is not entitled to such permit he shall issue a citation for the contemplated disapproval of the application.

[T.D. 6954, 33 FR 6814, May 4, 1968. Redesignated at 40 FR 16835, Apr. 15, 1975, as amended by T.D. ATF-374, 61 FR 29957, June 13, 1996]
§ 30.305 How does OWCP determine entitlement to EEOICPA compensation? ( a ) In reaching a recommended decision with respect to EEOICPA compensation, OWCP considers the claim presented by the claimant, the factual and medical evidence of record, the dose reconstruction report prepared by NIOSH (if any), any report submitted by DOE and the results of such investigation as OWCP may deem necessary.
( b ) The OWCP claims staff applies the law, the regulations and its procedures when it evaluates the medical evidence and the facts as reported or obtained upon investigation.
[71 FR 78534, Dec. 29, 2006, as amended at 84 FR 3050, Feb. 8, 2019]
#### § 30.421 What are the time frames for submitting bills and reimbursement requests?

To be considered for payment, bills and reimbursement requests must be submitted by the end of the calendar year after the year when the expense was incurred, or by the end of the calendar year after the year when OWCP first accepted the claim as compensable under subpart D of this part, whichever is later.
#### § 320.18 Hearings officer.

Within a reasonable time after a party has filed a properly executed appeal, the Director of Hearings and Appeals shall appoint a hearings officer to act in the appeal. Such hearings officer shall not have any interest in the parties or in the outcome of the proceeding, shall not have directly participated in the initial determination from which the appeal is made, and shall not have any other interest in the matter which might prevent a fair and impartial hearing. In any case in which employee status or creditability of compensation is an issue, the hearings officer shall receive evidence and report to the Board thereon with recommendations. In all other cases, the hearings officer shall consider and decide the appeal; in each such case where the hearings officer determines that an issue of fact exists, the parties shall have the right to a hearing.

[56 FR 65680, Dec. 18, 1991]
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY HIGH

 220

 219

 228

 236

 246

 369

 219

 214

 209

 206

 238

 374

 452

 450

 444

 445

 444

 466

 464

 469

 471

 474

 486

 497

 634

 648

 636

 615

 750

 2,282

 1,949

 145

 145

 150

 150

 153

 154

 153

 156

 158

 161

 162

 171

 223

 421

 423

 427

 427

 434

 439

 444

 447

 444

 447

 443

 480

 551

 568

 536

 431

 537

 538

 160

 175

 181

 187

 191

 233

 176

 183

 173

 171

 186

 252

 388

 438

 435

 438

 439

 444

 449

 451

 454

 453

 456

 469

 529

 624

 617

 578

 538

 1,306

 1,013

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

MARCH 2004 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: April 19, 2004

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

PITTSBURG TOP ON THE SACRAMENTO RIVER