alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY HIGH

 5,818

 5,215

 4,831

 5,562

 5,967

 6,993

 7,217

 7,435

 8,032

 8,821

 8,173

 7,584

 8,203

 7,798

 6,577

 5,024

 5,797

 5,505

 7,061

 6,782

 6,792

 7,466

 7,928

 9,015

 10,572

 10,645

 9,531

 7,960

 7,053

 5,950

 6,304

 1,015

 836

 1,131

 1,011

 1,105

 991

 1,032

 946

 1,030

 1,106

 1,192

 1,252

 1,386

 1,281

 1,383

 1,386

 1,304

 1,329

 1,491

 1,483

 1,243

 1,039

 1,118

 1,024

 1,072

 1,261

 1,288

 1,190

 1,169

 1,148

 1,158

 2,598

 2,530

 2,625

 2,384

 2,156

 2,441

 2,616

 2,662

 2,940

 3,449

 3,609

 3,398

 3,475

 3,335

 3,111

 2,850

 2,773

 2,625

 2,882

 3,033

 2,950

 2,879

 3,029

 3,741

 4,070

 3,956

 3,735

 3,328

 3,176

 2,900

 2,912

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

AUGUST 2011 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: September 22, 2011

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

PITTSBURG BOTTOM ON THE SACRAMENTO RIVER
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY HIGH

 2,053

 2,071

 1,938

 1,985

 2,104

 2,346

 2,383

 2,293

 2,348

 2,514

 2,471

 2,158

 1,902

 2,251

 2,402

 3,077

 3,661

 3,342

 3,374

 3,564

 3,696

 3,420

 3,288

 3,042

 2,570

 2,166

 1,738

 1,531

 1,635

 1,565

 1,557

 892

 915

 875

 867

 879

 980

 1,063

 1,050

 1,063

 1,069

 1,116

 1,098

 1,076

 1,065

 1,101

 1,145

 1,216

 1,178

 1,153

 1,160

 1,179

 1,216

 1,275

 1,268

 1,351

 1,230

 1,169

 1,084

 1,042

 1,017

 1,009

 1,308

 1,226

 1,135

 1,162

 1,301

 1,434

 1,466

 1,434

 1,474

 1,551

 1,557

 1,455

 1,396

 1,607

 1,491

 1,670

 1,811

 1,656

 1,665

 1,786

 1,927

 1,929

 1,878

 1,883

 1,741

 1,504

 1,365

 1,246

 1,210

 1,165

 1,192

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

DECEMBER 2018 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: January 3, 2019

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

14 DAY

ACCUM

MEAN

14 DAY 

AVG

MEAN

 34,379

 33,332

 32,122

 30,548

 28,606

 26,692

 25,031

 23,494

 22,296

 21,573

 20,961

 20,395

 19,424

 19,506

 19,689

 20,133

 20,809

 21,303

 21,667

 22,019

 22,480

 22,975

 23,379

 23,711

 23,895

 23,944

 23,913

 23,552

 23,271

 22,766

 22,147

 2,456

 2,381

 2,294

 2,182

 2,043

 1,907

 1,788

 1,678

 1,593

 1,541

 1,497

 1,457

 1,387

 1,393

 1,406

 1,438

 1,486

 1,522

 1,548

 1,573

 1,606

 1,641

 1,670

 1,694

 1,707

 1,710

 1,708

 1,682

 1,662

 1,626

 1,582

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

JERSEY POINT TOP ON THE SAN JOAQUIN RIVER
Exhibit 99.3
 CLAIRES STORES,
    INC.
  OFFER TO EXCHANGE
  $450,000,000 AGGREGATE
    PRINCIPAL AMOUNT OF OUTSTANDING
 8.875% SENIOR SECURED SECOND
    LIEN NOTES DUE 2019
  FOR
  $450,000,000 AGGREGATE
    PRINCIPAL AMOUNT OF
 8.875% SENIOR SECURED SECOND
    LIEN NOTES DUE 2019
 THAT HAVE BEEN REGISTERED
    UNDER
 THE SECURITIES ACT OF 1933, AS
    AMENDED
        1.
    the Prospectus;2.
    the Letter of Transmittal for your use and for the information
    of your clients; and3.
    a form of letter that may be sent to your clients for the
    account of which you hold Old Notes registered in your name or
    the name of your nominee, with space provided for obtaining such
    clients instructions with regard to the Exchange Offer.  YOUR PROMPT ACTION IS REQUESTED.  THE EXCHANGE
    OFFER WILL EXPIRE AT 5:00 P.M., NEW YORK CITY TIME, ON
    [          ],
    2011, UNLESS EXTENDED (SUCH TIME AND DATE, OR THE LATEST TIME
    AND DATE TO WHICH THE EXCHANGE OFFER HAS BEEN EXTENDED, THE
    EXPIRATION DATE). TENDERS OF NOTES MAY BE
    WITHDRAWN AT ANY TIME AT OR PRIOR TO THE EXPIRATION TIME.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 01-1861

FRANCIS AKINRO,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

MORGAN STATE UNIVERSITY,

Defendant - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of

Maryland, at Baltimore. Catherine C. Blake, District Judge. (CA01-862-CCB)

Submitted: November 20, 2001 Decided: December 3, 2001

Before NIEMEYER and LUTTIG, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior

Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Francis Akinro, Appellant Pro Se. Mark Jason Davis, Assistant

Attorney General, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Francis Akinro appeals from the district court’s order dismissing his complaint alleging his unlawful suspension from the

student body at Morgan State University. We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find no reversible error.

Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court.

Akinro v. Morgan State Univ., No. CA-01-862-CCB (D. Md. June 11,

2001). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the

court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
**Exhibit 23.1**Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting FirmWe consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement (Form S-8 No. 333-129105) pertaining to the American Commercial Lines Inc. Equity Award Plan for Employees, Officers and Directors,as Amended, and the American Commercial Lines Inc. 2005 Stock Incentive Plan, Inc. of our report dated February 17, 2006, withrespect to the consolidated financial statements and schedule ofAmerican Commercial Lines Inc. included in the Annual Report(Form 10-K) for the year ended December 31, 2005./s/ ERNST & YOUNG LLPMarch 21, 2006
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

DAY HIGH

 464

 489

 469

 452

 459

 492

 465

 495

 486

 520

 508

 537

 564

 620

 643

 621

 596

 596

 597

 601

 606

 615

 586

 600

 596

 582

 652

 617

 590

 594

 378

 401

 383

 386

 388

 379

 362

 386

 405

 390

 405

 413

 430

 434

 486

 488

 479

 514

 516

 505

 461

 467

 454

 454

 459

 461

 464

 495

 488

 538

 428

 437

 432

 425

 426

 437

 428

 441

 451

 450

 471

 489

 510

 530

 553

 554

 558

 564

 573

 577

 566

 543

 534

 542

 537

 533

 538

 553

 554

 566

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

SEPTEMBER 2016 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: October 19, 2016

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

DELTA MENDOTA CANAL AT CHECK 13 (O'NEILL)
Exhibit
10.9
 
 Amended And Restated Employment  Agreement
 CARDIAC SCIENCE CORPORATION
 Feroze Motafram
 Vice President, Operations
 Dated
as of September 20, 2006




---



##### 



Amended And Restated Employment Agreement
  WITNESSETH
     AGREEMENTS
  1. EMPLOYMENT




---



##### 



2. COMPENSATION AND BENEFITS
  2.1 Annual Salary
  2.2 Bonus
  2.3 Benefits




---



##### 



2.4 Vacation and Other Paid Time-Off Benefits
  3. TERMINATION
  3.1 Automatic Termination on Death or Total

 Disability
 total disability
 3.2 Other Termination Excluding Change of Control




---



##### 



3.3 Termination as a Result of Change of Control
 3.3.1 Termination by the Company or Successor Employer
 Successor Employer




---



##### 



3.3.2 Termination for Cause
  3.3.3 Termination by Executive
  3.3.4 Cause
 Cause




---



##### 



3.3.5 Good Reason
 Good Reason




---



##### 



3.3.6 Change of Control
 Change of Control
   Related Party Transaction




---



##### 



3.3.7 Gross-Up Payment




---



##### 



4. CONFIDENTIALITY AGREEMENT




---



##### 



5. ASSIGNMENT
  6. ARBITRATION
 AAA Rules
 7. AMENDMENTS IN WRITING




---



##### 



8. APPLICABLE LAW
  9. ENTIRE AGREEMENT
  10. SEVERABILITY




---



##### 



11. ORIGINAL AGREEMENT
   EXECUTIVE/s/ Feroze MotaframCARDIAC SCIENCE CORPORATIONBy
    /s/ Michael K. MatysikIts
    Chief Financial Officer
#### § 228.22 Entitlement to more than one survivor annuity.

If an individual is entitled to more than one survivor annuity, only the larger annuity will be paid. However, if the individual so chooses, he or she may receive the smaller annuity rather than the larger annuity.
#### § 255.3 When overpayments are to be recovered.

Overpayments shall be recovered in all cases except those in which recovery is waived under § 255.10 of this part or administrative relief from recovery is granted under § 255.16 of this part, or where the overpayment is compromised or recovery is terminated or suspended under § 255.18 or § 255.19 of this part.
Opinion filed February 4, 2010

In The

Eleventh Court of Appeals

____________

No. 11-09-00155-CR

__________

 MACE GREGORY GIFFORD, Appellant

V.

 STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the County Court

 Eastland County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 08-390

M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N

Mace Gregory Gifford has filed in this case a motion to dismiss his appeal. The motion is

signed by both appellant and his attorney. The motion is granted, and the appeal is dismissed.

PER CURIAM

February 4, 2010

Do not publish. See TEX. R. APP. P. 47.2(b).

Panel consists of: Wright, C.J.,

McCall, J., and Strange, J.
EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

Pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of section 1350, chapter 63 of title 18, United States Code), each of the undersigned officers of American Tire
Distributors Holdings, Inc., a Delaware corporation (the Company), hereby certifies that, to his best knowledge:

(a) the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended January 1, 2011 (the Report) of the Company fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(b) information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

|                      |  |  |  |     |  |                                                            
|--------------------- |  |  |  | --- |  | -----------------------------------------------------------
|                      |  |  | 
|Dated: March 15, 2011 |  |  |  | By: |  | /s/    WILLIAM E. BERRY                                    
|                      |  |  |  |     |  | Name: William E. Berry                                     
|                      |  |  |  |     |  | Title: President and Chief Executive Officer               
|                      |  |  | 
|                      |  |  |  | By: |  | /s/    DAVID L. DYCKMAN                                    
|                      |  |  |  |     |  | Name: David L. Dyckman                                     
|                      |  |  |  |     |  | Title: Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
## 

EXHIBIT 12.2

PACCAR Financial Corp.  COMPUTATION OF RATIO OF EARNINGS TO FIXED CHARGES  PURSUANT TO THE SUPPORT AGREEMENT  BETWEEN THE COMPANY AND PACCAR  (Thousands of Dollars)

|                                   |                               | Nine Months Ended
September 30 |        
|---------------------------------- | ----------------------------- | ------------------------------ | -------
|
|FIXED CHARGES                      |                               |                                |        
|                                   | Interest expense              |                                | $      
|                                   | Facility and equipment rental |                                |        
|                                   |                               |                                |        
|TOTAL FIXED CHARGES                |                               | $                              | 149,823
|                                   |                               |                                |        
|EARNINGS                           |                               |                                |        
|                                   | Income before taxes           |                                | $      
|                                   | Depreciation                  |                                |        
|                                   |                               |                                |        
|                                   |                               |                                | 50,318 
|                                   | Fixed charges                 |                                |        
|                                   |                               |                                |        
|EARNINGS AS DEFINED                |                               | $                              | 200,141
|                                   |                               |                                |        
|RATIO OF EARNINGS TO FIXED CHARGES |                               |                                | 1.34   

13

---

## QuickLinks
(No. 5152

#### Jake Van Yzendoorn, Guardian of the Estate of Michael Van Yzendoorn, A Minor; Jake Van Yzendoorn, Guardian of the Estate of Shirley Van Yzendoorn, A Minor; and Jake Van Yzendoorn, Administrator of the Estate of Sarah Van Yzendoorn, Deceased, Claimants, *vs.*State of Illinois, Respondent.

*Opinion filed November 14, 1972.*

Cooney and Stenn, Attorney for Claimants.

William J. Scott, Attorney General; Saul R. Wexler, and Martin Soll, Assistant Attorneys General, for Respondent.

Holderman, J.

Jake Van Yzendoorn, as Guardian of the estate of Michael Van Yzendoorn, a minor, as Guardian of the estate of Shirley Van Yzendoorn, a minor, and as Administrator of the estate of Sarah Van Yzendoorn, deceased, filed suit against the State of Illinois asking for an award of Twenty-five Thousand ($25,000.00) Dollars for each of the two minors and an additional Twenty-five Thousand ($25,000.00) Dollars to be paid to him as Administrator of the estate of Sarah Van Yzendoorn, deceased.

The two minors, with their mother, were passengers in a car on the 8th day of March, 1963, which was being driven by one Rheta Hobbs in an easterly direction along and upon Jonathan Creek Road, at or near its intersection with Illinois Route 133, approximately three miles west of Arthur, Illinois, in Moultrie County.

*120This car, at said intersection, collided with a car driven by one Duane W. Eveland and then collided with another motor vehicle being operated by one Lester Schrook.

As a result of the collisions, Michael Van Yzendoorn, Shirley Van Yzendoorn, and Sarah Van Yzendoorn were seriously injured. Sarah Van Yzendoorn died as a result of said injuries on the 8th day of March, 1963.

The State is charged with negligence in that it did not have adequate and proper traffic control signs at said intersection.

This case has already been passed upon by this Court as the Administrator of the estate of Duane W. Eveland filed suit asking for a recovery of $25,000.00, and alleged in his complaint that the deceased met his death of March 8, 1963, as a result of the same accident in question.

The State has filed a motion to dismiss citing the Eveland case and its findings.

In view of the fact that the entire question of alleged negligence of the State and all the facts concerning the accident were so clearly and concisely set forth in the Opinion of Judge Perlin, 25 C.C.R., Page 256 (1965), it would be repetitious to go over the same facts again.

The above mentioned decision of this Court held that the accident in question was caused solely by the negligence of the driver of the car in which the Van Yzendoorns were occupants and that it was her negligence, and her negligence alone, which caused the accident, injuries and death complained of.

Wherefore, this Court grants the motion to dismiss the instant cause.
#### § 24.202 Dried fruit.

In the production of wine from dried fruit, a quantity of water sufficient to restore the moisture content to that of the fresh fruit may be added. If it is desired not to restore the moisture content of the dried fruit to that of the fresh fruit, or if the moisture content is not known, sufficient water may be added to reduce the density to 22 degrees Brix. If the dried fruit liquid after restoration is found to be deficient in sugar, sufficient pure dry sugar may be added to increase the total solids content to 25 degrees Brix. After addition of water to the dried fruit, the resulting liquid may be ameliorated with either water or sugar, or both, in such total volume as may be necessary to reduce the natural fixed acid level of the mixture to a minimum of 5.0 grams per liter; however, in no event may the volume of the ameliorating material exceed 35 percent of the total volume of the ameliorated juice or wine (calculated exclusive of pulp). Pure dry sugar may be used for sweetening. After complete fermentation or complete fermentation and sweetening, the finished product may not have a total solids content that exceeds 35 degrees Brix.

(26 U.S.C. 5387)

[T.D. ATF-299, 55 FR 24989, June 19, 1990, as amended by T.D. TTB-23, 70 FR 2801, Jan. 18, 2005]
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

DAY HIGH

 24,206

 23,682

 23,475

 23,507

 24,106

 25,843

 23,296

 19,914

 20,831

 16,671

 15,657

 17,903

 21,453

 21,226

 18,721

 17,547

 16,232

 14,280

 13,527

 12,776

 12,838

 14,582

 11,974

 14,151

 16,520

 17,558

 17,694

 18,620

 12,784

 13,089

 13,030

 12,841

 13,630

 14,335

 15,320

 13,408

 10,892

 8,053

 5,219

 3,759

 2,706

 3,155

 2,437

 2,563

 3,237

 2,481

 2,880

 2,985

 3,599

 4,458

 3,444

 3,374

 4,290

 4,941

 5,739

 5,115

 18,869

 18,257

 18,216

 18,343

 18,727

 20,649

 19,583

 17,242

 15,657

 11,221

 8,970

 8,994

 10,879

 11,325

 10,627

 9,935

 9,240

 8,354

 7,982

 8,041

 8,635

 8,603

 7,267

 8,199

 9,129

 10,291

 10,954

 11,342

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

FEBRUARY 2015 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: March 4, 2015

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

PORT CHICAGO BOTTOM IN SUISUN BAY
#### § 220.58 Objections to the designated physician or psychologist.

A claimant or his or her representative may object to his or her being examined by a designated physician or psychologist. If there is a good reason for the objection, the Board will schedule the examination with another physician or psychologist. A good reason may be where the consultative examination physician or psychologist had previously represented an interest adverse to the claimant. For example, the physician or psychologist may have represented the claimant's employer in a worker's compensation case or may have been involved in an insurance claim or legal action adverse to the claimant. Other things the Board will consider are: language barrier, office location of consultative examination physician or psychologist (2nd floor, no elevator, etc.), travel restrictions, and examination by the physician or psychologist in connection with a previous unfavorable determination. If the objection is because a physician or psychologist allegedly “lacks objectivity” (in general, but not in relation to the claimant personally) the Board will review the allegations. To avoid a delay in processing the claimant's claim, the consultative examination in such a case will be changed to another physician or psychologist while a review is being conducted. Any objection to use of the substitute physician or psychologist will be handled in the same manner. However, if the Board or the Social Security Administration had previously conducted such a review and found that the reports of the consultative physician or psychologist in question conform to the Board's guidelines, then the Board will not change the claimant's examination.
#### § 348.2 Recognition by the Board of a person to act in behalf of another.

The provisions of part 266 of this chapter shall be applicable to the appointment of a representative payee under this part to the same extent and in the same manner as they are applicable to the appointment of a representative payee under the Railroad Retirement Act.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY HIGH

 2,521

 4,682

 6,621

 8,695

 10,862

 9,859

 6,898

 2,759

 1,058

 627

 480

 275

 233

 231

 235

 205

 186

 207

 174

 170

 167

 170

 171

 169

 172

 224

 248

 189

 186

 182

 183

 472

 553

 766

 1,435

 2,932

 2,364

 883

 725

 484

 348

 252

 213

 194

 184

 175

 156

 160

 160

 154

 156

 152

 157

 162

 162

 161

 164

 176

 172

 170

 168

 173

 1,112

 2,021

 3,400

 4,391

 6,051

 6,151

 3,757

 1,401

 656

 463

 326

 242

 215

 204

 202

 180

 176

 174

 167

 163

 161

 163

 166

 165

 165

 172

 199

 181

 177

 175

 178

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

MARCH 2016 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: April 12, 2016

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

PITTSBURG TOP ON THE SACRAMENTO RIVER
§ 225.33 Months for which DRC's are due. ( a ) A DRC is due for each month after 1970 in which the employee is— ( 1 ) Full retirement age or older and under age 70 (72 before 1984); and
( 2 ) Fully insured under section 214(a) of the Social Security Act based on combined railroad and social security earnings; and either— ( i ) Is not entitled to an annuity because he or she did not apply for an annuity; or
( ii ) Is entitled to an annuity but has the full amount of the tier I and vested dual benefit work deduction component (described in part 226 of this chapter) or the social security overall minimum rate (described in part 229 of this chapter) withheld because of earnings in excess of the exempt amount (as explained in part 230 of this chapter).
( b ) The months for which credit is due need not be consecutive.
[54 FR 12903, Mar. 29, 1989, as amended at 68 FR 39010, July 1, 2003]
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY HIGH

 161

 162

 145

 139

 131

 134

 152

 192

 230

 236

 603

 642

 671

 744

 935

 889

 560

 443

 351

 433

 1,528

 1,514

 3,170

 2,500

 3,178

 3,350

 3,936

 4,903

 5,742

 7,033

 6,038

 122

 116

 115

 122

 123

 125

 129

 136

 139

 137

 136

 137

 146

 151

 151

 155

 165

 168

 158

 157

 177

 196

 207

 288

 217

 303

 418

 457

 523

 757

 829

 132

 129

 127

 126

 126

 128

 136

 146

 152

 159

 203

 220

 254

 284

 314

 331

 284

 253

 221

 211

 335

 441

 745

 907

 923

 1,073

 1,367

 1,879

 2,349

 2,675

 2,495

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

JULY 2011 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: August 24, 2011

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

PITTSBURG TOP ON THE SACRAMENTO RIVER