alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 13.2





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the United States Code), the undersigned officer of Dejour Enterprises Ltd., (the Company) does hereby certify with respect to the Annual Report of the Company on Form 20-F for the period ended December 31, 2008 (the Report) that:

1.

The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



2.

The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.







Date: October 23, 2009

/s/ Mathew Wong

Mathew Wong

Chief Financial Officer, Principal Accounting and Financial Officer
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information
extracted from SEC Form 10KSB and is qualified in its
entirety by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1996
<CASH>                                      14,936,402
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                7,440,538
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            72,774,446
<PP&E>                                      57,739,205
<DEPRECIATION>                                 607,795
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              81,011,949
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       66,954,658
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                  2,500,000
<COMMON>                                       219,218
<OTHER-SE>                                   6,338,073
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                81,011,949
<SALES>                                         45,599
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            17,481,773
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             9,197,019
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           3,650,901
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              4,026,058
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          4,026,058
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 4,026,058
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .85
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .85
        

</TABLE>
§ 10.813 If OWCP reduces a fee, may a provider bill the claimant for the balance? A provider whose fee for service is partially paid by OWCP as a result of the application of its fee schedule or other tests for reasonableness in accordance with this part shall not request reimbursement from the employee for additional amounts. ( a ) Where a provider's fee for a particular service or procedure is lower to the general public than as provided by the schedule of maximum allowable charges, the provider shall bill at the lower rate. A fee for a particular service or procedure which is higher than the provider's fee to the general public for that same service or procedure will be considered a charge “substantially in excess of such provider's customary charges” for the purposes of § 10.815(d).
( b ) A provider whose fee for service is partially paid by OWCP as the result of the application of the schedule of maximum allowable charges and who collects or attempts to collect from the employee, either directly or through a collection agent, any amount in excess of the charge allowed by OWCP, and who does not cease such action or make appropriate refund to the employee within 60 days of the date of the decision of OWCP, shall be subject to the exclusion procedures provided by § 10.815(h).
I 

114TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 3709 

To make permanent the pilot program administered by the Secretary of 

Veterans Affairs regarding enhanced contract care authority for the 

health care needs of veterans located in highly rural areas, and for 

other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

OCTOBER 8, 2015 

Mr. POLIQUIN (for himself and Mrs. KIRKPATRICK) introduced the following 

bill; which was referred to the Committee on Veterans’ Affairs 

A BILL 

To make permanent the pilot program administered by the 

Secretary of Veterans Affairs regarding enhanced contract care authority for the health care needs of veterans 

located in highly rural areas, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Helping our Rural Vet5 erans Receive Health Care Act’’. 


smartinez on DSK4TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 3709 IH

1 SEC. 2. PROGRAM OF ENHANCED CONTRACT CARE AU2 THORITY FOR HEALTH CARE NEEDS OF VET3 ERANS IN HIGHLY RURAL AREAS. 

4 (a) PERMANENT PROJECT ARCH.—Subsection (a) 

5 of section 403 of the Veterans’ Mental Health and Other 

6 Care Improvements Act of 2008 (Public Law 110–387; 

7 38 U.S.C. 1703 note) is amended— 

8 (1) by striking paragraph (3); 

9 (2) by redesignating paragraph (4) as para10 graph (3); and 

11 (3) in paragraph (3), as so redesignated— 

12 (A) by striking ‘‘Veterans Integrated Serv13 ice Networks (and such other locations as the 

14 Secretary considers appropriate)’’ and inserting 

15 ‘‘locations’’; and 

16 (B) by adding at the end the following new 

17 subparagraph: 

18 ‘‘(F) Such other locations that the Sec19 retary determines necessary to ensure that all 

20 covered veterans may participate in the pro21 gram.’’. 

22 (b) CONFORMING AMENDMENTS.—Such section 403 

23 is further amended— 

24 (1) by striking ‘‘pilot program’’ each place it 

25 appears and inserting ‘‘program’’; and 


smartinez on DSK4TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
3 

•HR 3709 IH

1 (2) in subsection (k)(2), by striking ‘‘regard2 ing’’ and all that follows through the period and in3 serting ‘‘regarding the continuation of the pro4 gram.’’. 

Æ 


smartinez on DSK4TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
(No. 7073

#### Riveredge Hospital, Claimant, *vs.*State of Illinois, Department of Children and Family Services, Respondent.

*Opinion filed May 3, 1973.*

*299Riveredge Hospital, Claimant, pro se.

William J. Scott, Attorney General; Saul R. Wexler, Assistant Attorney General, for Respondent.

Per Curiam.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY

 23,783

 23,899

 24,000

 23,899

 23,764

 24,166

 24,573

 24,548

 24,264

 23,673

 23,212

 22,956

 22,822

 22,816

 22,500

 22,388

 22,348

 22,093

 22,062

 22,015

 21,717

 21,365

 20,701

 21,108

 21,377

 21,182

 20,584

 20,037

 19,461

 19,030

 18,895

 71,046

 70,798

 70,558

 70,558

 70,722

 70,773

 71,002

 71,096

 71,382

 72,069

 72,572

 72,777

 72,982

 73,129

 73,398

 73,501

 73,521

 73,265

 72,317

 71,521

 70,938

 70,350

 70,097

 69,178

 68,421

 67,809

 67,504

 67,150

 66,958

 66,518

 65,765

STORAGE - A.F. 

 94,829

 94,697

 94,558

 94,457

 94,486

 94,939

 95,575

 95,644

 95,646

 95,742

 95,784

 95,733

 95,804

 95,945

 95,898

 95,889

 95,869

 95,358

 94,379

 93,536

 92,655

 91,715

 90,798

 90,286

 89,798

 88,991

 88,088

 87,187

 86,419

 85,548

 84,660

375

345

334

338

479

702

1,061

556

387

1,020

892

580

600

1,017

636

531

534

603

944

977

955

1,027

994

2,059

2,427

1,302

1,048

1,008

1,307

2,412

287

311

278

264

287

494

930

1,382

591

388

1,068

913

554

636

1,088

612

526

524

345

450

552

511

553

532

1,801

2,181

895

593

554

920

1,973

-161

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

DECEMBER 2003 FULL NATURAL FLOW AT NEW MELONES DAM RUN DATE: 01/02/2004

TOTALS -10,296 22,545

* October 1, 44,718

 43.0

 43.5

 44.0

 44.6

 45.6

 47.4

 50.2

 51.3

 52.1

 54.2

 56.0

 57.1

 58.4

 60.6

 61.8

 62.8

 63.9

 64.5

 65.4

 66.5

 67.5

 68.6

 69.7

 73.3

 77.6

 79.4

 80.5

 81.6

 83.5

 87.4

 87.1

DONNELLS

RES

BEARDSLEY

RES

2003 TO DATE

NEW

MELONES

INFLOW

C.F.S

NATURAL

RIVER

C.F.S

ACCUM *

FULL

NATURAL

1000 A.F.

RESERVOIR

TOTAL

-127

-132

-139

-101

+29

+453

+636

+69

+2

+96

+42

-51

+71

+141

-47

-9

-20

-511

-979

-843

-881

-940

-917

-512

-488

-807

-903

-901

-768

-871

-888

CHANGE

A.F. C.F.S.

-64

-67

-70

-51

+15

+228

+321

+35

+1

+48

+21

-26

+36

+71

-24

-5

-10

-258

-494

-425

-444

-474

-462

-258

-246

-407

-455

-454

-387

-439

-448
§ 261.1 Reopening and revising decisions. ( a ) This part sets forth the Board's rules governing finality of decisions. After the expiration of the time limits for review as set forth in part 260 of this chapter, decisions of the agency may be reopened and revised under the conditions described in this part, by the bureau, office, or entity that made the earlier decision or by a bureau, office, or other entity at a higher level, which has the claim properly before it.
( b ) A *final decision* as that term is used in this part means any decision of the type listed in § 260.1 of this chapter where the time limits for review as set forth in part 260 of this chapter or in the Railroad Retirement Act have expired.
( c ) *Reopening* a final decision under this part means a conscious determination on the part of the agency to reconsider an otherwise final decision for purposes of revising that decision.
( d ) *New and material evidence* as that phrase is used in this part means evidence that may reasonably be expected to affect a final decision, which was unavailable to the agency at the time the decision was made, and which the claimant could not reasonably have been expected to have submitted at that time.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY HIGH

 986

 964

 915

 915

 734

 791

 815

 840

 931

 1,131

 1,137

 1,087

 1,110

 1,118

 1,108

 1,108

 1,169

 1,172

 1,133

 1,080

 1,121

 917

 805

 741

 791

 879

 766

 694

 593

 596

 601

 715

 735

 670

 625

 602

 607

 631

 645

 639

 648

 646

 652

 659

 644

 625

 605

 587

 603

 567

 616

 597

 596

 563

 582

 572

 606

 590

 343

 339

 345

 361

 798

 814

 747

 705

 650

 662

 732

 742

 773

 812

 887

 863

 865

 849

 820

 814

 915

 867

 855

 868

 816

 708

 660

 668

 648

 703

 639

 541

 475

 468

 463

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

MARCH 2018 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: April 3, 2018

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

DELTA MENDOTA CANAL AT CHECK 13 (O'NEILL)
#### § 31.42 Restaurants serving liquors with meals.

Proprietors of restaurants and other persons who serve liquors with meals to paying customers, even if no separate or specific charge for the liquors is made, are dealers subject to the provisions of this part.

(26 U.S.C. 5122)
### §§8171, 8172. Repealed. Pub. L. 107–110, title X, §1011(5)(A), Jan. 8, 2002, 115 Stat. 1986

Section 8171, Pub. L. 89–10, title X, §10711, as added Pub. L. 103–382, title I, §101, Oct. 20, 1994, 108 Stat. 3841, authorized grants for fellowships.

Section 8172, Pub. L. 89–10, title X, §10712, as added Pub. L. 103–382, title I, §101, Oct. 20, 1994, 108 Stat. 3841, related to applications.
# C_2012012EN.01002101.xml

| 14.1.2012 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 12/21 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

14.1.2012

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 12/21

---

DECISION TO CLOSE THE FORMAL INVESTIGATION PROCEDURE AFTER WITHDRAWAL BY MEMBER STATE

State aid — Poland

(Articles 107 to 109 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union)

Commission notice pursuant to Article 108(2) of the TFEU — Withdrawal of notification

State aid SA.30340 (11/C) — LIP — PL — Fiat Powertrain Technologies Poland

(Text with EEA relevance)

2012/C 12/08

The Commission has decided to close the formal investigation procedure under Article 108(2) of the TFEU, initiated on 9 February 2011 (1) in respect of the measure referred to above, recording that Poland has withdrawn its notification on 16 September 2011 and will reduce the aid amount, in order to respect the limits and fulfill the conditions of Commission Regulation (EC) No 800/2008 of 6 August 2008 declaring certain categories of aid compatible with the common market in application of Articles 87 and 88 of the Treaty (General Block Exemption Regulation) (2).

1

2

---

(1)  OJ C 151, 21.5.2011, p. 5.

1

(2)  OJ L 214, 9.8.2008, p. 3.

2

---
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY HIGH

 19,462

 16,109

 12,566

 9,273

 8,419

 19,437

 24,507

 22,468

 22,023

 21,364

 20,891

 21,153

 20,484

 23,965

 24,432

 25,059

 25,364

 27,908

 27,181

 26,592

 26,713

 25,629

 24,316

 23,140

 23,295

 22,764

 24,346

 24,430

 23,917

 23,000

 22,217

 5,904

 7,054

 5,485

 3,912

 3,822

 1,980

 6,762

 10,798

 10,900

 11,588

 10,805

 10,904

 11,577

 12,030

 11,401

 10,948

 10,988

 11,261

 13,010

 13,622

 14,089

 13,328

 12,489

 12,309

 11,809

 11,243

 11,997

 12,269

 12,456

 9,367

 12,293

 11,675

 10,244

 7,873

 6,404

 5,795

 10,040

 14,720

 16,732

 16,761

 16,555

 15,935

 15,445

 15,204

 15,973

 16,669

 17,367

 17,878

 18,650

 19,067

 19,784

 19,714

 19,310

 18,776

 17,777

 17,706

 16,325

 16,799

 17,440

 17,243

 15,253

 17,480

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

AUGUST 2013 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: February 19, 2014

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

PORT CHICAGO TOP IN SUISUN BAY
EXHIBIT 3.26
 Adopted: March 1 , 2008
 AMENDED AND RESTATED
BY-LAWS
OF
FARMINGTON HOSPITAL CORP.
 ARTICLE I
 OFFICES
   ARTICLE II
 SHAREHOLDERS




---



##### 



ARTICLE III
 DIRECTORS
  2




---



##### 



3




---



##### 



4




---



##### 



ARTICLE IV
 OFFICERS
      5




---



##### 



ARTICLE V
 CONTRACTS, LOANS, CHECKS AND DEPOSITS
  6




---



##### 



ARTICLE VI
 CERTIFICATES FOR SHARES AND THEIR TRANSFER
  ARTICLE VII
 FISCAL YEAR
  ARTICLE VIII
 DIVIDENDS
  7




---



##### 



ARTICLE IX
 SEAL
  ARTICLE X
 WAIVER OF NOTICE
  ARTICLE XI
 INDEMNIFICATION OF OFFICERS AND DIRECTORS
  ARTICLE XII
 AMENDMENTS
  8
###### Editorial Note on Part 555

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 555 appear by T.D. ATF-487, 68 FR 3748, Jan. 24, 2003.

#### § 555.77 Designated place of hearing.

The designated place of hearing set as provided in § 555.73 or § 555.75, will be at the location convenient to the aggrieved party.
Electrical Conductivity, UMHOS

Day High Low Mean

1 0 0 0

2 0 0 0

3 0 0 0

4 0 0 0

5 0 0 0

6 0 0 0

7 0 0 0

8 0 0 0

9 0 0 0

10 0 0 0

11 0 0 0

12 0 0 0

13 0 0 0

14 0 0 0

15 0 0 0

16 0 0 0

17 0 0 0

18 0 0 0

19 0 0 0

20 0 0 0

21 0 0 0

22 0 0 0

23 0 0 0

24 0 0 0

25 0 0 0

26 0 0 0

27 0 0 0

28 0 0 0

29 0 0 0

30 0 0 0

31 0 0 0

COMMENT(S): 0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

Historical Archive and Report Database

Port Chicago Bottom In Suisun Bay

Run Date: 4/14/2024

March 2024
###### Editorial Note on Part 70

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 70 appear by T.D. ATF-450, 66 FR 29022-29030, May 29, 2001.

#### § 70.449 Offers in compromise.

The procedures in the case of offers in compromise of liabilities under 26 U.S.C. 4181 and chapter 53 are set forth in §§ 70.482 and 70.484.

[T.D. ATF-331, 57 FR 40329, Sept. 3, 1992]
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 99-1073

JAMES P. MIXON, JR.,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA; RONALD J. SMITH;

MARTIN HOULIHAN,

Defendants - Appellees,

and

JAMES SAMPLES; EDWARD SCHARDER,

Defendants.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern

District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Henry C. Morgan, Jr., District

Judge. (CA-98-430-2)

Submitted: April 15, 1999 Decided: April 20, 1999

Before NIEMEYER and HAMILTON, Circuit Judges, and PHILLIPS, Senior

Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
2

James P. Mixon, Jr., Appellant Pro Se. Michael Anson Rhine, OFFICE

OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Norfolk, Virginia, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).

PER CURIAM:

James Mixon, Jr., appeals the district court’s dismissal of

his action against several agents of the Federal Bureau of Investigation. We have reviewed the record and the district court’s

opinions and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on

the reasoning of the district court. See Mixon v. United States,

No. CA-98-430-2 (E.D. Va. Oct. 28, 1998; Dec. 28, 1998; Jan. 26,

1999). We deny Mixon’s motions for the appointment of counsel and

for expedited treatment and dispense with oral argument because the

facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional

process.

AFFIRMED
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY HIGH

 23,838

 25,596

 27,278

 31,434

 25,785

 21,234

 18,390

 16,675

 13,038

 11,629

 9,691

 8,237

 7,084

 8,967

 13,256

 16,951

 17,621

 17,940

 17,180

 18,976

 18,996

 16,052

 16,012

 16,477

 15,501

 13,674

 12,353

 11,746

 7,014

 6,158

 9,137

 12,003

 13,248

 14,891

 16,615

 11,689

 7,483

 4,739

 3,892

 2,874

 1,873

 1,306

 1,147

 810

 802

 1,205

 1,672

 2,530

 2,418

 2,467

 3,905

 3,626

 3,409

 2,948

 3,385

 4,710

 5,488

 4,260

 2,641

 677

 449

 405

 16,693

 19,067

 20,570

 23,845

 20,046

 16,333

 13,158

 10,693

 7,879

 6,201

 5,030

 4,119

 3,627

 4,092

 5,473

 6,907

 8,229

 9,669

 9,486

 10,680

 10,805

 9,208

 9,268

 10,145

 10,376

 9,934

 8,847

 5,791

 2,522

 1,552

 1,877

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

JANUARY 2008 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: February 4, 2008

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

PORT CHICAGO BOTTOM IN SUISUN BAY
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY HIGH

 980

 980

 1,040

 1,046

 1,035

 1,056

 1,050

 1,057

 1,062

 1,107

 1,054

 1,048

 1,033

 970

 949

 979

 966

 969

 1,000

 1,007

 993

 936

 981

 1,017

 934

 976

 961

 939

 944

 950

 945

 345

 348

 353

 352

 332

 328

 329

 328

 330

 322

 325

 322

 328

 318

 318

 325

 321

 323

 326

 317

 313

 302

 290

 288

 284

 284

 292

 299

 298

 292

 296

 555

 538

 659

 614

 590

 584

 591

 610

 670

 674

 620

 638

 602

 590

 592

 612

 556

 534

 606

 615

 586

 541

 561

 536

 558

 611

 574

 545

 525

 511

 533

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

MARCH 2002 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: April 10, 2002

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

DELTA MENDOTA CANAL AT CHECK 13 (O'NEILL)
#### § 206.1 Definitions.

Except as otherwise expressly noted, as used in this part—

*Account benefits ratio* means the amount determined by the Railroad Retirement Board by dividing the fair market value of the assets in the Railroad Retirement Account and the National Railroad Retirement Investment Trust (and for years prior to 2002, the Social Security Equivalent Benefit Account) as of the close of each fiscal year by the total benefits and administrative expenses paid from those accounts during the fiscal year.

*Administrative expenses paid* means the amount of the cash transfers from the Railroad Retirement Account to the agency's single administrative fund. Also included in this term is the amount of the cash transfers from the Railroad Retirement Account to the Limitation on the Office of Inspector General and the administrative expenses paid by the National Railroad Retirement Investment Trust.

*Assets* means the market value of cash and investments in the Railroad Retirement Account and the National Railroad Retirement Investment Trust (and for years before 2002, the Social Security Equivalent Benefit Account).

*Average account benefits ratio* means for any calendar year, the average of the account benefits ratio for the 10 most recent fiscal years ending before such calendar year. If the amount computed is not a multiple of 0.1, such amount shall be increased to the next highest 0.1.

*Total benefits paid* means the total amount of benefits paid from the Railroad Retirement Account and the National Railroad Retirement Investment Trust in a fiscal year minus any benefit overpayments actually recovered during that fiscal year.
Exhibit 99.2

                         ANNUAL STATEMENT OF COMPLIANCE


                      OFFICER'S CERTIFICATE OF THE SERVICER

In compliance with Section 4.04 (g) of the Indenture of Trust by and between
Nelnet Student Loan Trust 2005-2 and Zions First National Bank, as Trustee,
dated as of April 1, 2005, I, Terry J. Heimes, certify that:

     1.   A review of the activities of the Subservicer during the preceding
          calendar year and of its performance under the Nelnet, Inc.
          Subservicing Agreement has been made under my supervision; and

     2.   Based on my knowledge of such review, the Subservicer has fulfilled
          all its obligations under the Nelnet, Inc. Subservicing Agreement
          throughout such year.

March 20, 2006




By:     /s/ Terry J. Heimes
        --------------------------------
        Terry J. Heimes
        Chief Financial Officer,
        Treasurer,
        Nelnet, Inc.