alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
ex_126962.htm


Exhibit 10.02


 


First Amendment to 


Amended and restated EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT


 


This First Amendment (“Amendment”) to the Amended and Restated Employment Agreement by and between Natural Alternatives International, Inc., a Delaware corporation (“Company”), and Kenneth E. Wolf (“Employee”), dated effective as of October 1, 2015 (“Agreement”), is made and entered into effective as of July 1, 2018. Unless otherwise defined herein, capitalized terms shall have the meanings given them in the Agreement.


 


1.      Pursuant to Section 4(a) of the Agreement, Employee’s base salary is hereby increased to Four Hundred Thousand dollars ($400,000) per year.


 


2.     Except as set forth herein, all other terms and conditions of the Agreement shall remain in full force and effect.


 


IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned have executed this Amendment as of September 20, 2018.


 


 


EMPLOYEE


 


 


/s/ Kenneth E. Wolf                     


Kenneth E. Wolf


 


 


COMPANY


 


Natural Alternatives International, Inc.,


a Delaware corporation


 


 


/s/ Mark LeDoux                    


Mark LeDoux, Chief Executive Officer
114TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 3957 

AN ACT 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to temporarily 

allow expensing of certain costs of replanting citrus 

plants lost by reason of casualty. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 
2 

•HR 3957 EH

1 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

2 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Emergency Citrus Dis3 ease Response Act of 2016’’. 

4 SEC. 2. EXPENSING OF CERTAIN COSTS OF REPLANTING 

5 CITRUS PLANTS LOST BY REASON OF CAS6 UALTY. 

7 (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 263A(d)(2) of the Inter8 nal Revenue Code of 1986 is amended by adding at the 

9 end the following new subparagraph: 

10 ‘‘(C) SPECIAL TEMPORARY RULE FOR CIT11 RUS PLANTS LOST BY REASON OF CASUALTY.— 

12 ‘‘(i) IN GENERAL.—In the case of the 

13 replanting of citrus plants, subparagraph 

14 (A) shall apply to amounts paid or in15 curred by a person (other than the tax16 payer described in subparagraph (A)) if— 

17 ‘‘(I) the taxpayer described in 

18 subparagraph (A) has an equity inter19 est of not less than 50 percent in the 

20 replanted citrus plants at all times 

21 during the taxable year in which such 

22 amounts were paid or incurred and 

23 such other person holds any part of 

24 the remaining equity interest; or 

25 ‘‘(II) such other person acquired 

26 the entirety of such taxpayer’s equity 
3 

•HR 3957 EH

1 interest in the land on which the lost 

2 or damaged citrus plants were located 

3 at the time of such loss or damage, 

4 and the replanting is on such land. 

5 ‘‘(ii) TERMINATION.—Clause (i) shall 

6 not apply to any cost paid or incurred 

7 after December 31, 2025.’’. 

8 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

9 this section shall apply to costs paid or incurred after the 

10 date of the enactment of this Act. 

Passed the House of Representatives September 21, 

2016. 

Attest: 

Clerk. 
114TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 3957 

AN ACT 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to 

ualty. replanting citrus plants lost by reason of castemporarily allow expensing of certain costs of
NUMBER 13-08-00331-CR

COURT OF APPEALS

THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG

____________________________________________________________

GLORIA ANN GARCIA, Appellant,

v.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee.

____________________________________________________________

On appeal from the 105th District Court of Kleberg County, Texas.

____________________________________________________________

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Before Chief Justice Valdez and Justices Yañez and Benavides

Memorandum Opinion Per Curiam

Appellant, Gloria Ann Garcia, was convicted of possession of a controlled

substance. On May 22, 2008, appellant filed a pro se notice of appeal. On August 11,

2008, appointed counsel informed this Court that he would be filing a motion to dismiss.

On March 26, 2009, this Court abated the appeal because of counsel’s failure to either file

a motion to dismiss or make appropriate arrangements with the reporter for preparation of

the reporter’s record and instructed the trial court to make findings as to whether the
2

appellant had abandoned her appeal.

Based on the trial court hearing, the trial court judge found that appellant has

abandoned her appeal. The court further found that on January 15, 2009 the trial court

entered a Judgment Nunc Pro Tunc granting additional credit to appellant for time she

spent in Kleberg County Jail in this cause and that appellant only wanted to correct this

mistake and did not wish to appeal the judgment in this cause.

Although no written motion has been filed in compliance with Rule 42.2(a) of the

Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure, based upon the evidence at the hearing that

appellant does not want to continue her appeal, we conclude that good cause exists to

suspend the operation of Rule 42.2(a) in this case. See TEX. R. APP. P. 2. Accordingly,

we dismiss the appeal.

PER CURIAM

Do not publish. See TEX. R. APP. P. 47.2(b). 

Memorandum Opinion delivered and

filed this 25th day of June, 2009.