alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 220.105 Initial evaluation of a previous disability. ( a ) In some cases, the Board may determine that a claimant is not currently disabled but was previously disabled for a specified period of time in the past. This can occur when— ( 1 ) The disability application was filed before the claimant's disability ended but the Board did not make the initial determination of disability until after the claimant's disability ended; or
( 2 ) The disability application was filed after the claimant's disability ended but no later than the 12th month after the month the disability ended.
( b ) When evaluating a claim for a previous disability, the Board follows the steps in § 220.100 to determine whether a disability existed, and follows the steps in § 220.180 to determine when the disability ended.
Example 1. The claimant sustained multiple fractures to his left leg in an automobile accident which occurred on June 16, 1982. For a period of 18 months following the accident the claimant underwent 2 surgical procedures which restored the functional use of his leg. After a recovery period following the last surgery, the claimant returned to work on February 1, 1984. The claimant, although fully recovered medically and regularly employed, filed an application on December 3, 1984 for a determination of disability for the period June 16, 1982 through January 31, 1984. The Board reviewed his claim in January 1985 and determined that he was disabled for the prior period which began June 16, 1982 and continued through January 31, 1984. A disability annuity is payable to the employee only for the period December 1, 1983 through January 31, 1984. An annuity may not begin any earlier than the 1st of the 12th month before the month in which the application was filed (See part 218 of this chapter for the rules on when an annuity may begin).
Example 2: The claimant is disabled using the same medical facts disclosed above, beginning June 16, 1982 (the date of the automobile accident). The claimant files an application for a disability annuity, dated December 1, 1983. However, as of February 1, 1984, and before the Board makes a disability determination, the claimant returns to full-time work and is no longer considered disabled. The Board reviews the claimant's application in May 1984 and finds him disabled for the period June 16, 1982 through January 31, 1984. A disability annuity is payable to the employee from December 1, 1982 through January 31, 1984. (See part 218 of this chapter for the rules on when an annuity may begin).
###### Editorial Note on Part 46

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 46 appear by T.D. ATF-457, 66 FR 32220, 32221, June 14, 2001.

#### § 46.208 Unmerchantable articles.

Articles that the dealer holds for return to a supplier because of some defect are not subject to the floor stocks tax. However, the dealer must segregate any such unmerchantable articles and include them in a separate section of the inventory record. The dealer cannot include as unmerchantable any items that may be held because of poor market demand or to reduce the dealer's inventory. If, for any reason, the tobacco products or cigarette papers or tubes that were determined to be unmerchantable are not subsequently returned or destroyed, the dealer must file an additional floor stocks tax return and pay tax on such products plus any applicable penalties and interest.

(Approved by the Office of Management and Budget under control number 1513-0129)
THIRD AMENDMENT TO
EXCLUSIVE RAGNAROK SOFTWARE LICENSE AGREEMENT
 Third Amendment to the Exclusive Ragnarok Software License Agreement(this Amendment) th Gravity Co. Ltd. Gravity EU SASU
 RECITALS
 WHEREAS th nd
 WHEREAS th th th
 WHEREAS
 AGREEMENT
 NOW, THEREFORE
 1.
    
    Term Extension of the Agreement
 Parties agreed to extend the Agreement for three (3) years (Second Renewed Term) from
theexpiration date of the Agreement. The newly extended term of the Agreement shall be
from December 29th, 2010 to December 28th, 2013.
 2.
    
    Royalty
 The Article 5.2 in the Agreement shall be deleted in its entirety, and replaced with the
following language:
 1




---



##### 



5.2
    
    Royalty Payment and ReportIn addition to the License Fee, Licensee shall pay to Licensor as Royalty payments Thirty
percent (30%) of the Gross-Sales Amount paid by End Users (Royalty) for the period of this
Agreement. Subject to Section 5.4 below, the Royalty Payment shall be paid on a monthly
basis within twenty (20) days after the end of the applicable month. The Royalty Payment
shall be deemed made upon presentation of Licensee whether in fax or any other means the
remittance confirmation or notice to Licensor. In any case, unless Licensor actually
receives the remitted amount, the payment shall not be deemed to be paid. Licensee shall
also provide Licensor with a report (Royalty Report) on a monthly basis within twenty (20)
days after the end of the applicable month. Each Royalty Report shall contain detailed
information on the calculation of Gross Sales Amount for the applicable month.
 3.
    
    Territory
 The Article 1.19 of The Agreement shall be amended as the following language and this
amended article shall be effective from 15th date of October 2010 :
 1.19
    
    Territory shall mean the territory of the following European Countries:
 France, Belgium, The United Kingdom, Finland, Sweden, Ireland, Denmark, Spain, Austria, Bulgaria, Cyprus, Czech, Republic, Estonia, Germany, Greece, Hungary, Italy,
Latvia, Lithuania, Luxembourg, Malta, Netherlands, Poland, Portugal, Romania, Slovakia, Slovenia, Switzerland, Turkey, Norway, Scotland(32 service territories in total).
 4.
    
    Continuing Effectiveness of the Agreement
 Except as expressly set forth herein, this Amendment shall not by implication or otherwise alter, modify, amend or in any way affect any of the terms, conditions, obligations, covenants
or agreements contained in the Agreement, all of which are ratified and affirmed in all
respects and shall continue in full force and effect.
 IN WITNESSETH WHEREOF
 2




---



##### 



LICENSOR:Gravity Co.,Ltd.By:
    
    ________________________________________
    
    By:
    
    ________________________________________Name
    
    Toshiro OHNO
    
    Name:
    
    Yoon Seok KangTitle:
    
    President, CEO
    
    Title:
    
    CEODate:
    
    October 16, 2010
    
    Date:
    
    October 16, 2010LICENSEE:Gravity EU SASUBy:
    
    ________________________________________Name:
    
    Changki KimTitle:
    
    General DirectorDate:
    
    October 16, 2010
 3
Exhibit 32(a)

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of PACCAR Financial Corp. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2011 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on
the date hereof (the Report), the undersigned certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of our knowledge and belief:



|(1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|--- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|(2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
|--- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                 |  |  |  |    |  |                              
|---------------- |  |  |  | -- |  | -----------------------------
|Date May 6, 2011 |  |  |  | By |  | /s/    Mark C. Pigott        
|                 |  |  |  |    |  | Mark C. Pigott               
|                 |  |  |  |    |  | Chairman                     
|                 |  |  |  |    |  | PACCAR Financial Corp.       
|                 |  |  |  |    |  | (Principal Executive Officer)
|                 |  |  | 
|                 |  |  |  | By |  | /s/    Robert A. Bengston    
|                 |  |  |  |    |  | Robert A. Bengston           
|                 |  |  |  |    |  | Vice Chairman                
|                 |  |  |  |    |  | PACCAR Financial Corp.       
|                 |  |  |  |    |  | (Principal Financial Officer)

A signed original of this
written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
#### Wallie Gillick et al. v. Wilson Williams et al.

Filed December 21, 1897.

No. 9121.

Injunction: Remedy at Law. On the authority of *Warlier v. Williams,*53 Neb. 143, the decree of the district court is affirmed.

Error from the district court of Burt county. Tried below before Fawcett, J.

*Affirmed.*

*McOoy & Olmsted,*for plaintiffs in error. .

*H. E. Garter, contra.*

Ragan, C.

The facts in this case are in all respects the same as in *Warlier v. Williams,*53 Neb. 143, and, on the authority of that case, the decree of the district court in this is

Affirmed.
(No. 7014

#### Sears, Roebuck and Company, Claimant, *vs.*State of Illinois, Department of Public Aid, Respondent.

*Opinion filed April 16, 1973.*

Robert Vespa, Attorney for Claimant.

William J. Scott, Attorney General; William E. Webber, Assistant Attorney General, for Respondent.

Per Curiam.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY ELEVATION

 238.45

 238.45

 238.42

 238.47

 238.46

 238.47

 238.47

 238.48

 238.47

 238.47

 238.47

 238.48

 238.48

 238.48

 238.48

 238.47

 238.48

 238.67

 238.59

 238.62

 238.69

 238.74

 238.75

 238.63

 238.64

 238.72

 238.71

 238.77

 238.80

 238.72

 237.79

 294

 294

 291

 296

 295

 296

 296

 297

 296

 296

 296

 297

 297

 297

 297

 296

 297

 316

 308

 311

 318

 323

 325

 312

 313

 321

 320

 327

 330

 321

 230

STORAGE

+0

+0

-3

+5

-1

+1

+0

+1

-1

+0

+0

+1

+0

+0

+0

-1

+1

+19

-8

+3

+7

+5

+2

-13

+1

+8

-1

+7

+3

-9

-91

CHANGE

 179

 156

 206

 209

 102

 78

 26

 52

 43

 156

 83

 103

 74

 156

 154

 179

 252

 320

 296

 149

 133

 80

 79

 154

 260

 196

 150

 96

 91

 101

 108

 6,490

 6,550

 6,580

 6,750

 6,770

 6,680

 6,560

 6,800

 6,710

 6,750

 6,890

 6,890

 6,910

 6,170

 6,600

 6,710

 7,570

 7,470

 7,400

 7,520

 7,500

 7,720

 7,570

 7,540

 7,320

 7,610

 7,625

 7,750

 7,740

 7,380

 7,690

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

OCTOBER 2008 RED BLUFF DIVERSION RESERVOIR DAILY OPERATIONS RUN DATE: November 1, 2008

IN LAKE

CANAL

 ACRE-FEET

TOTALS -64 4,421 220,215

ACRE-FEET -64 8,769 436,796

SUMMARY

RELEASE (ACRE-FEET)

TOTAL 446,527

 294

RELEASE

RIVER

CORNING TO SACTO

CANAL

RELEASE C.F.S.

TEHAMA

COLUSA

 31

 43

 11

 6

 0

 0

 0

 10

 18

 14

 19

 0

 30

 12

 43

 39

 31

 14

 18

 18

 24

 22

 20

 12

 7

 9

 7

 6

 9

 5

 7

 485

 962

CORNING CANAL 962

TEHAMA-COLUSA CANAL 8,769

TO SACTO RIVER 436,796
Electrical Conductivity, UMHOS

Day High Low Mean

1 236 211 216

2 221 206 214

3 216 194 206

4 214 184 198

5 214 188 197

6 227 194 206

7 228 207 213

8 257 210 221

9 229 209 217

10 239 209 216

11 235 212 219

12 239 218 226

13 240 223 228

14 236 223 227

15 243 222 229

16 240 215 227

17 229 208 218

18 218 192 204

19 202 170 185

20 198 172 180

21 207 178 186

22 226 179 190

23 240 189 204

24 241 167 201

25 237 166 196

26 246 161 201

27 247 169 203

28 242 172 203

29 244 168 201

30 248 182 204

31 248 182 205

COMMENT(S):

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

Historical Archive and Report Database

Rio Vista On The Sacramento River

Period: January 2024 Run Date: 2/7/2024
Exhibit 3.13
 CERTIFICATE OF FORMATION
 OF
 CSI Canada LLC
  FIRST
 SECOND
 IN WITNESS WHEREOF th
 Its sole member,
CLAIRES CANADA CORP.By:
    
    /s/ David Ovis
 Name:
David Ovis (Authorized Person)Title:    Vice President
### §§8181, 8182. Repealed. Pub. L. 107–110, title X, §1011(5)(A), Jan. 8, 2002, 115 Stat. 1986

Section 8181, Pub. L. 89–10, title X, §10721, as added Pub. L. 103–382, title I, §101, Oct. 20, 1994, 108 Stat. 3842, authorized grants for fellowships.

Section 8182, Pub. L. 89–10, title X, §10722, as added Pub. L. 103–382, title I, §101, Oct. 20, 1994, 108 Stat. 3842, related to applications.
# C_2012062EN.01000301.xml

| 1.3.2012 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 62/3 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

1.3.2012

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 62/3

---

Information communicated by Member States regarding State aid granted under Commission Regulation (EC) No 1857/2006 on the application of Articles 87 and 88 of the Treaty to State aid to small and medium-sized enterprises active in the production of agricultural products and amending Regulation (EC) No 70/2001

2012/C 62/03

Aid No: SA.34214 (12/XA)

Member State: Italy

Region: Veneto

Title of aid scheme or name of company receiving an individual aid: Piani integrati a supporto delle imprese venete per la creazione di valore in azienda — Linea 3 — III Fase — Valorizzazione del capitale umano.

Legal basis: LR 10/90 «Ordinamento sistema di formazione professionale e organizzazione delle politiche regionali del lavoro», Dgr n. 1566 del 26 maggio 2009«Politiche attive per il contrasto alla crisi occupazionale», Dgr n. 1735 del 26 ottobre 2011 e Ddr n. 933 del 22 dicembre 2011.

La data di applicazione decorre dalla data di pubblicazione del numero di registro della richiesta di esenzione sul sito della direzione generale dell'Agricoltura e dello sviluppo rurale della Commissione.

Annual expenditure planned under the scheme or overall amount of individual aid granted to the company: Annual overall amount of the budget planned under the scheme: EUR 0,16 million

Maximum aid intensity: 100 %

Date of implementation: —

Duration of scheme or individual aid award: 16 February 2012-31 December 2013

Objective of aid: Technical support (Article 15 of Regulation (EC) No 1857/2006)

Sector(s) concerned: Agriculture, forestry and fishing

Name and address of the granting authority:

| Regione del Veneto |
| --- |
| Palazzo Balbi |
| Dorsoduro 3901 |
| 30123 Venezia VE |
| ITALIA |

Regione del Veneto

Palazzo Balbi

Dorsoduro 3901

30123 Venezia VE

ITALIA

Website: http://www.regione.veneto.it/Servizi+alla+Persona/Formazione+e+Lavoro/SpazioOperatori.htm

Other information: —

---
§ 355.20 Disclosure of documents. ( a ) Upon written request to the reviewing official, the defendant may review any relevant and material documents, transcripts, records, and other materials that relate to the allegations set out in the complaint and upon which the findings and conclusions of the investigating official under § 355.4(b) are based unless such documents are subject to a privilege under Federal law. Upon payment of fees for duplication, the defendant may obtain copies of such documents.
( b ) Upon written request to the reviewing official, the defendant also may obtain a copy of all exculpatory information in the possession of the reviewing official or investigating official relating to the allegations in the complaint, even if it is contained in a document that would otherwise be privileged. If the document would otherwise be privileged, only that portion containing exculpatory information must be disclosed.
( c ) The notice sent to the Attorney General from the reviewing official as described in § 355.5 is not discoverable under any circumstances.
( d ) The defendant may file a motion to compel disclosure of the documents subject to the provisions of this section. Such a motion may only be filed with the ALJ following the filing of an answer pursuant to § 355.9.
#### § 226.1 Introduction.

This part explains how employee, spouse, and divorced spouse annuities are computed. It describes how to determine the years of railroad service and average monthly compensation used in computing the employee annuity rate. The railroad retirement family maximum, cost-of-living increases, and the recomputation of an annuity to include additional railroad earnings are also explained in this part.
Re:     Registration Statement on Form S-4 (the Registration Statement) filed with the Securities
Exchange Commission (the SEC) by Claires Stores Inc., a Florida corporation (the Company)
pursuant to the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the Act)
  Colorado Guarantor Exchange Offer Old Notes Exchange Notes Guarantees
 Original Issuer Trustee Indenture
   Organizational Documents




---



##### 








---



##### 








---



##### 



et seq
      Very truly yours,
HUTCHINSON BLACK AND COOK, LLC
A Colorado limited liability companyBy:
    /s/  Maureen E. Eldredge, Esq.Maureen E. Eldredge, Esq.Member
# C_2012221EN.01000801.xml

| 25.7.2012 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 221/8 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

25.7.2012

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 221/8

---

Information communicated by Member States regarding State aid granted under Commission Regulation (EC) No 1857/2006 on the application of Articles 87 and 88 of the Treaty to State aid to small and medium-sized enterprises active in the production of agricultural products and amending Regulation (EC) No 70/2001

2012/C 221/03

Aid No: SA.34749 (12/XA)

Member State: Slovakia

Region: Bratislavský, Západné Slovensko, Stredné Slovensko, Východné Slovensko

Title of aid scheme or name of company receiving an individual aid: Schéma štátnej pomoci na úhradu strát na hospodárskych zvieratách v dôsledku nariadených veterinárnych opatrení v znení Dodatku č. 1

Legal basis:

| — | § 8 a príslušné ustanovenia nariadenia vlády SR č. 319/2011 Z. z. z 28. septembra 2011 o podpore podnikania v pôdohospodárstve a rozvoji vidieka upravujúce poskytovanie pomoci podľa tejto schémy |
| --- | --- |

—

§ 8 a príslušné ustanovenia nariadenia vlády SR č. 319/2011 Z. z. z 28. septembra 2011 o podpore podnikania v pôdohospodárstve a rozvoji vidieka upravujúce poskytovanie pomoci podľa tejto schémy

| — | zákon č. 19/2002 Z. z. |
| --- | --- |

—

zákon č. 19/2002 Z. z.

| — | § 45 zákona č. 39/2007 Z. z. |
| --- | --- |

—

§ 45 zákona č. 39/2007 Z. z.

| — | zákon č. 523/2004 Z. z. |
| --- | --- |

—

zákon č. 523/2004 Z. z.

| — | zákon č. 231/1999 Z. z. |
| --- | --- |

—

zákon č. 231/1999 Z. z.

| — | zákon č. 513/1991 Zb. |
| --- | --- |

—

zákon č. 513/1991 Zb.

| — | zákon č. 455/1991 Zb. |
| --- | --- |

—

zákon č. 455/1991 Zb.

| — | zákon č. 105/1990 Zb. |
| --- | --- |

—

zákon č. 105/1990 Zb.

| — | zákon č. 181/1995 Z. z. |
| --- | --- |

—

zákon č. 181/1995 Z. z.

| — | zákon č. 111/1990 Zb. |
| --- | --- |

—

zákon č. 111/1990 Zb.

Annual expenditure planned under the scheme or overall amount of individual aid granted to the company: Annual overall amount of the budget planned under the scheme: EUR 1,00 (in millions)

Maximum aid intensity: 100,00 %

Duration of scheme or individual aid award: 3.7.2012-31.12.2013

Objective of aid: Animal diseases (Art. 10 of Reg. (EC) No 1857/2006)

Sector(s) concerned: Crop and animal production, hunting and related service activities

Name and address of the granting authority:

| Ministerstvo pôdohospodárstva a rozvoja vidieka SR |
| --- |
| Dobrovičova ul. č. 12 |
| Bratislava 812 66 |
| Slovenská republika |

Ministerstvo pôdohospodárstva a rozvoja vidieka SR

Dobrovičova ul. č. 12

Bratislava 812 66

Slovenská republika

Website: http://www.mpsr.sk/sk/index.php?navID=161

Other information: —

---
### Part A—Task Force on Prohibition of Importation of Products of Forced or Prison Labor From the People's Republic of China
LNR


Partners,
      Inc.

















**ANNUAL
      PERFORMANCE CERTIFICATION**


**OF**


**LNR
      PARTNERS, INC.**





**Pooling
      and Servicing Agreement dated as of April 11, 2005 (the
“Agreement”),**


**by
      and among Structured Asset Securities Corporation II, as Depositor, Wells Fargo
      Bank, N. A., as Master Servicer, LaSalle Bank, N.A., as Trustee, ABN AMRO Bank
      N.V. as Fiscal Agent, and LNR Partners, Inc., as Special
      Servicer**


**(LBUBS
      2005-C2)**








The
      undersigned, Susan K. Chapman, as Vice President of LNR Partners, Inc., a
      Florida Corporation (the “Company”), in accordance with Section 3.13 of the
      Agreement, hereby certifies on behalf of the Company that (i) a review of the
      activities of the Company during the year ended December 31, 2005 and of its
      performance under the Agreement has been made under my supervision, (ii) to
      the
      best of my knowledge, based on such review, the Company has performed and
      fulfilled all of its material obligations under the Agreement in all material
      respects throughout such period ended December 31, 2005, (iii) the Company
      has
      received no notice regarding the qualification, or challenging the status,
      of
      any REMIC Pool as a REMIC or the Grantor Trust as a grantor trust, from the
      IRS
      or any other governmental agency or body.





IN
      WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has executed and delivered this Certificate
      as
      of the 1 st day of
      March, 2006.














/s/
      Susan K.
      Chapman


Susan
      K.
      Chapman


Vice
      President


LNR
      Partners,
      Inc.
### Part C—Computation and Payment of Annuities
NREL is a national laboratory of the U.S. Department of Energy, Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy, operated by the Alliance for Sustainable Energy, LLC.

Integrated Energy System 

Alternatives for Consideration

Integrated Nuclear-Renewable Energy 

Systems Foundational Workshop

Mark F. Ruth

Idaho Falls, Idaho

July 8, 2014

NREL/PR-6A20-62208
2

Presentation Objective

• Propose specific integrated nuclear-renewable 

energy systems for discussion

• All options coupled behind the electrical 

transmission bus

Credit: Ruth, et al “Integrated Nuclear-Renewable Energy Systems – Assessment and 

Deployment Roadmap Plan” In review
3

Opportunities Categorized Regionally 

• Resources

• Market opportunities

• Energy delivery options

• Policies

• Regulatory issues

• Others

Regional categorization because of heterogeneity
4

Eight Opportunities Identified
5

Mountain West

• Natural gas and wind resources

• Transmission congestion

• LNG potential for rail and trucking
6

Pacific Northwest

• Extensive resources for electricity generation

• Traditional aluminum smelting and potential 

for exporting
7

Southern California

• Power grid flexibility issues

• Coastal area with tidal power potential

• Fresh-water constrained 
8

Southwest

• Concentrated solar power and geothermal resources

• Opportunities for large power demand centers

• Hydrogen vehicles limit emissions
9

Gulf Coast

• Traditional refining industry with growing need 

for hydrogen
10

Southeast

• Biomass resource near refining centers
11

Mid-Atlantic and Northeast

• Non-traditional natural gas resources

• Chemical industry
12

Midwest

• Wind resources

• Fertilizer demand for farming
13

Next Steps

Think about the eight opportunities proposed

• Are they appropriate for the regions?

• Can you identify better options due to 

markets, resources, technologies, etc.?

• Did we miss a region that should be 

considered?

• Tomorrow

o Feedback in a gallery walk

o Identification of priority opportunities
Questions?