alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Federal Reserve System

The notificants listed below have applied under the Change in Bank Control Act (12 U.S.C. 1817(j)) and § 225.41 of the Board's Regulation Y (12 CFR 225.41) to acquire shares of a bank or bank holding company. The factors that are considered in acting on the notices are set forth in paragraph 7 of the Act (12 U.S.C. 1817(j)(7)).

The notices are available for immediate inspection at the Federal Reserve Bank indicated. The notices also will be available for inspection at the offices of the Board of Governors. Interested persons may express their views in writing to the Reserve Bank indicated for that notice or to the offices of the Board of Governors. Comments must be received not later than April 28, 2011.

A. Federal Reserve Bank of Kansas City (Dennis Denney, Assistant Vice President) 1 Memorial Drive, Kansas City, Missouri 64198-0001:

                    1.                     *Mark T. Mowat,*                     Omaha, Nebraska, as a member of a group acting in concert; to acquire control of Frontier Management, LLC, Omaha, Nebraska, and thereby indirectly acquire control of Frontier Holdings, LLC, Omaha, Nebraska; Frontier Bank, Madison, Nebraska; Frontier Bank, Davenport, Nebraska; and Pender State Bank, Pender, Nebraska.                

Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, April 8, 2011.

Robert deV. Frierson,

Deputy Secretary of the Board.

[FR Doc. 2011-8946 Filed 4-13-11; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6210-01-P
§ 10.608 How does OWCP decide whether to grant or deny the request for reconsideration? ( a ) A timely request for reconsideration may be granted if OWCP determines that the employee has presented evidence and/or argument that meets at least one of the standards described in § 10.606(b)(3). If reconsideration is granted, the case is reopened and the case is reviewed on its merits (see § 10.609).
( b ) Where the request is timely but fails to meet at least one of the standards described in § 10.606(b)(3), or where the request is untimely and fails to present any clear evidence of error, OWCP will deny the application for reconsideration without reopening the case for a review on the merits. A decision denying an application for reconsideration cannot be the subject of another application for reconsideration. The only review for this type of non-merit decision is an appeal to the ECAB (see § 10.625), and OWCP will not entertain a request for reconsideration or a hearing on this decision denying reconsideration.
February 9, 2012

Ms Delane Richardson

Director of Research

Chemtex International Inc 6951 Ridge Road Sharon Center, OH 44274

Dear Ms Richardson

Pursuant to our phone conversation this morning, I have reviewed the document “Voluntary Best Management Practices for Energy Crops

– Minimizing the Risk of Invasiveness” published by

North Carolina State University, the North Carolina Department of Agriculture and the Biofuels Center of North Carolina, and agree that the practices they propose for a) information gathering, b) planting and field management, c) harvesting, d) transportation, a nd e) storage, are feasible for

the commercial cultivation of Arundo donax as a biofuel crop. These practices minimize the chance of Arundo donax escaping from cultivated plantings.

I have conducted experimentation in Ohio with Arundo donax for three years and have some experienc e regarding it biology; namely: (i) Arundo donax has a high yi eld potential ( up to 20 tons/ac under ideal conditions ) , and as such, has potential for use as a biofuel crop in Ohio. (ii) Arundo donax has been used widely as an ornamental species throughout Ohio, but has not been observed or documented to have “escaped ” from these plantings. Although we have not measured the response of Arundo donax to cold temperature, I believe the cold winters in Ohio are a significant factor in preventing the dispersal of Arundo donax that is observed and reported in south ern USA states

. (iii) I have a 1⁄4 acre nursery plot of Arundo donax in Columbus Ohio that is approximately 12 years old. This area grows within 50 feet of a stream

, but is separated from the stream by a regularly mowed grass buffer strip . We have not measured nor observed any spread of

Arundo donax plants from this nursery area into the stream

. (iv) Arundo donax produce s short rhizomes, however we have not observed spread of plants by more than 2 feet per year. This rate of spread makes it unlikely t hat Arundo donax will escape managed stands. (v) Although Arundo donax produces a spectacular flower head, we do not see any evidence of seed production from these seed heads, nor have observed any propagation of seedlings from seed. I believe this sp ecies is sterile.

Yours sincerely

Dr David Barker Associate Professor, Grassland Ecology



## Department of Horticulture and Crop Science

226 Kottman Hall Phone: (614) 247

- 6258 2021 Coffey Road Fax: (614) 292

- 7162
Columbus OH 43210

- 1086 E

- mail: barker.169@osu.edu
Exhibit 4.3


Consent of Independent Registered
Public Accounting Firm


We consent to the
reference made to our firm under the caption “Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm” in Part B of the Prospectus
and to the use of our report dated July 2, 2015, in this Registration Statement (Form S-6 No. 333-204201) of Smart Trust, Argus
Dividend Growers Total Return Trust, Series 5.


 


/s/ Grant
Thornton LLP


 


Chicago, Illinois


July 2, 2015
§ 30.112 What kind of evidence is needed to establish covered employment and how will that evidence be evaluated? ( a ) Evidence of covered employment may include: employment records; pay stubs; tax returns; Social Security records; and written affidavits or declarations, subject to penalty of perjury, by the employee, survivor or any other person. However, no one document is required to establish covered employment and a claimant is not required to submit all of the evidence listed above. A claimant may submit other evidence not listed above to establish covered employment. To be acceptable as evidence, all documents and records must be legible. OWCP will accept photocopies, certified copies, and original documents and records.
( b ) Pursuant to §§ 30.105 and/or 30.106, DOE or another entity verifying alleged employment shall certify that it concurs with the employment information provided by the claimant, that it disagrees with the information provided by the claimant, or, after a reasonable search of its records and a reasonable effort to locate pertinent records not already in its possession, it can neither concur nor disagree with the information provided by the claimant. ( 1 ) If DOE or another entity certifies that it concurs with the employment information provided by the claimant, then the criterion for covered employment will be established.
( 2 ) If DOE or another entity certifies that it disagrees with the information provided by the claimant or that after a reasonable search of its records and a reasonable effort to locate pertinent records not already in its possession it can neither concur nor disagree with the information provided by the claimant, OWCP will evaluate the evidence submitted by the claimant to determine whether the claimant has established covered employment by a preponderance of the evidence. OWCP may request additional evidence from the claimant to demonstrate that the claimant has met the criterion for covered employment. Nothing in this section shall be construed to limit OWCP's ability to require additional documentation.
( 3 ) If the only evidence of covered employment submitted by the claimant is a written affidavit or declaration subject to penalty of perjury by the employee, survivor or any other person, and DOE or another entity either disagrees with the assertion of covered employment or cannot concur or disagree with the assertion of covered employment, then OWCP will evaluate the probative value of the affidavit in conjunction with the other evidence of employment, and may determine that the claimant has not met his or her burden of proof under § 30.111.
[71 FR 78534, Dec. 29, 2006, as amended at 84 FR 3048, Feb. 8, 2019]
Exhibit 10.1


 


AMENDMENT NO. 1


TO THE


RITCHIE BROS. AUCTIONEERS INCORPORATED


SENIOR EXECUTIVE PERFORMANCE SHARE UNIT
PLAN


(MARCH 2015)


 


The Board of Directors of Ritchie Bros.
Auctioneers Incorporated (the “Corporation”), pursuant to its authority to amend the Senior Executive Performance
Share Unit Plan (the “Plan”) contained in Section 9.11(a) of the Plan, hereby adopts this Amendment No. 1 to
the Plan as of August 8, 2018 (this “Amendment”).


 


		1.	Section 6.5 of the Plan is hereby deleted and replaced in its entirety as follows:



 


“6.5Time of
Payment


 


Subject to section 6.4,
amounts payable pursuant to section 6.1 will be paid as soon as practicable following the date on which the PSUs vest after
the Corporation has determined the number of PSUs that have vested. Notwithstanding the foregoing, if payment of any amount pursuant
to this section 6.5 would otherwise occur at any time during which a Participant may be in possession of undisclosed material
information regarding the Corporation, or at any time during which, pursuant to any insider or securities trading policy of the
Corporation, the ability of a Participant to trade in securities of the Corporation may be restricted, unless the Committee otherwise
determines, payment will be postponed to the date which is five days after the later of (i) the date on which the Participant
is no longer in possession of material undisclosed information or (ii) the date on which the ability of the Participant to
trade in securities of the Corporation is not restricted.”


 


		2.	Remaining Provisions. All other provisions of the Plan remain in full force and effect, unmodified by this Amendment.



 


		3.	Miscellaneous. Capitalized terms used herein without definitions have the meanings given to them in the Plan, except
where the context requires otherwise.
§ 10.738 Under what circumstances are benefits payable in LEO claims? ( a ) Benefits are payable when an officer is injured while apprehending, or attempting to apprehend, an individual for the commission of a Federal crime. However, either an actual Federal crime must be in progress or have been committed, or objective evidence (of which the officer is aware at the time of injury) must exist that a potential Federal crime was in progress or had already been committed. The actual or potential Federal crime must be an integral part of the criminal activity toward which the officer's actions are directed. The fact that an injury to an officer is related in some way to the commission of a Federal crime does not necessarily bring the injury within the coverage of the FECA. The FECA is not intended to cover officers who are merely enforcing local laws.
( b ) For benefits to be payable when an officer is injured preventing, or attempting to prevent, a Federal crime, there must be objective evidence that a Federal crime is about to be committed. An officer's belief, unsupported by objective evidence, that he or she is acting to prevent the commission of a Federal crime will not result in coverage. Moreover, the officer's subjective intent, as measured by all available evidence (including the officer's own statements and testimony, if available), must have been directed toward the prevention of a Federal crime. In this context, an officer's own statements and testimony are relevant to, but do not control, the determination of coverage.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 9
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          SEP-30-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1996
<CASH>                                           6,604
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                               0
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                 4,210
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                     24,806
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                          30,718
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                            30,985
<LOANS>                                        127,479
<ALLOWANCE>                                      1,999
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 199,498
<DEPOSITS>                                     171,199
<SHORT-TERM>                                     7,529
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                              1,346
<LONG-TERM>                                          0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         2,033
<OTHER-SE>                                      17,391
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>                 199,498
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                  8,491
<INTEREST-INVEST>                                2,518
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                   127
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                                11,136
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                               4,743
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               4,986
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                            6,150
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                      344
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                  27
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                  4,002
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  2,569
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                       2,569
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     1,937
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.95
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.95
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    4.38
<LOANS-NON>                                        134
<LOANS-PAST>                                       101
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                     0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                      0
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                 1,775
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                      160
<RECOVERIES>                                        39
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                                1,999
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                             1,999
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                            969
        

</TABLE>
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

DAY HIGH

 164

 167

 164

 163

 164

 161

 159

 161

 162

 161

 156

 159

 158

 165

 165

 161

 163

 155

 152

 145

 136

 136

 134

 134

 136

 130

 131

 134

 131

 126

 147

 144

 142

 143

 145

 148

 149

 149

 149

 148

 142

 141

 139

 142

 139

 137

 132

 128

 124

 122

 120

 119

 118

 120

 122

 117

 114

 113

 116

 115

 154

 152

 151

 151

 152

 153

 154

 155

 156

 154

 149

 148

 147

 151

 149

 146

 145

 144

 140

 136

 131

 127

 125

 127

 127

 122

 120

 121

 122

 119

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

APRIL 2017 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: May 3, 2017

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

14 DAY

ACCUM

MEAN

14 DAY

AVG

MEAN

 2,138

 2,124

 2,115

 2,108

 2,108

 2,109

 2,115

 2,124

 2,133

 2,136

 2,135

 2,134

 2,131

 2,127

 2,122

 2,116

 2,110

 2,103

 2,091

 2,074

 2,051

 2,023

 1,992

 1,965

 1,943

 1,917

 1,890

 1,860

 1,833

 1,806

 153

 152

 151

 151

 151

 151

 151

 152

 152

 153

 153

 152

 152

 152

 152

 151

 151

 150

 149

 148

 147

 145

 142

 140

 139

 137

 135

 133

 131

 129

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

JERSEY POINT TOP ON THE SAN JOAQUIN RIVER
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF INCOME FOR THE 3 MONTHS ENDED MARCH 31, 1997 AND
THE CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET FOR THE QUARTER ENDED MARCH 31, 1997 AND IS
QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                                        <C>          
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                  3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                        DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                             MAR-31-1997
<CASH>                                       873,900
<SECURITIES>                                       0
<RECEIVABLES>                              2,525,066
<ALLOWANCES>                                  93,885
<INVENTORY>                                4,760,184
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                           8,346,012
<PP&E>                                       444,598
<DEPRECIATION>                               186,903
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                            19,725,234
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                      3,134,828
<BONDS>                                            0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                              0
<PREFERRED>                                   11,500
<COMMON>                                       1,547
<OTHER-SE>                                15,401,571
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>              19,725,234
<SALES>                                    3,896,764
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                           3,912,277
<CGS>                                      2,328,374
<TOTAL-COSTS>                              3,414,394
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                              79,870
<LOSS-PROVISION>                              14,112
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                            60,209
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              357,804
<INCOME-TAX>                                  32,750
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          325,054
<DISCONTINUED>                                     0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                    0
<CHANGES>                                          0
<NET-INCOME>                                 325,054
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    .17
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    .17
                                        

</TABLE>
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY HIGH

 26,498

 26,739

 28,121

 28,401

 27,233

 28,941

 28,096

 28,513

 27,987

 31,406

 29,570

 27,453

 29,635

 23,878

 24,011

 22,830

 21,155

 22,709

 24,552

 24,994

 27,100

 28,372

 24,817

 23,857

 19,666

 18,215

 19,847

 19,929

 18,124

 17,540

 18,720

 18,887

 18,189

 17,981

 19,054

 19,028

 19,999

 19,366

 18,893

 18,932

 19,604

 18,936

 17,637

 17,169

 17,605

 14,964

 14,128

 7,733

 14,934

 16,512

 15,973

 16,014

 15,943

 13,034

 12,075

 9,099

 8,405

 7,766

 8,678

 9,846

 10,354

 10,682

 22,879

 22,208

 23,187

 22,937

 21,943

 22,772

 23,039

 23,322

 23,320

 25,196

 24,720

 23,379

 23,838

 21,092

 19,497

 19,137

 16,689

 19,234

 19,803

 19,691

 20,147

 21,096

 19,418

 18,348

 15,973

 13,826

 13,716

 14,403

 14,894

 14,054

 14,202

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

DECEMBER 2015 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: January 5, 2016

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

PORT CHICAGO TOP IN SUISUN BAY
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY ELEV

 980.56

 980.09

 979.62

 979.16

 978.76

 978.33

 977.94

 977.60

 977.33

 976.90

 976.41

 975.99

 975.64

 975.19

 974.82

 974.42

 974.21

 973.79

 973.33

 972.89

 972.63

 972.34

 971.92

 971.55

 971.32

 970.93

 970.61

 970.18

 969.83

 969.57

 969.19

 1,299.3

 1,295.3

 1,291.3

 1,287.4

 1,284.0

 1,280.4

 1,277.1

 1,274.3

 1,272.0

 1,268.4

 1,264.3

 1,260.8

 1,257.9

 1,254.1

 1,251.1

 1,247.8

 1,246.0

 1,242.5

 1,238.7

 1,235.1

 1,233.0

 1,230.6

 1,227.1

 1,224.1

 1,222.2

 1,219.0

 1,216.4

 1,212.9

 1,210.1

 1,208.0

 1,204.9

STORAGE

-2.9

-4.0

-4.0

-3.9

-3.4

-3.6

-3.3

-2.9

-2.3

-3.6

-4.1

-3.5

-2.9

-3.7

-3.1

-3.3

-1.7

-3.5

-3.8

-3.6

-2.1

-2.4

-3.5

-3.0

-1.9

-3.2

-2.6

-3.5

-2.8

-2.1

-3.1

CHANGE

327

257

252

196

318

385

527

545

671

197

221

177

223

108

312

665

688

542

670

579

703

679

541

574

680

618

511

792

704

744

603

INFLOW

 1,693

 2,175

 2,181

 2,055

 1,906

 2,089

 2,062

 1,875

 1,703

 1,924

 2,194

 1,828

 1,568

 1,876

 1,741

 2,216

 1,445

 2,179

 2,481

 2,300

 1,664

 1,775

 2,161

 1,985

 1,520

 2,100

 1,699

 2,436

 2,022

 1,713

 2,048

POWER

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

SPILL

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

OUTLET

 91

 96

 79

 104

 115

 123

 122

 109

 111

 92

 92

 119

 124

 121

 121

 121

 121

 115

 104

 109

 117

 106

 119

 117

 109

 127

 127

 124

 118

 95

 110

C.F.S.

 .33

 .35

 .29

 .38

 .42

 .45

 .45

 .40

 .41

 .34

 .34

 .44

 .46

 .45

 .45

 .45

 .45

 .43

 .39

 .41

 .44

 .40

 .45

 .44

 .41

 .48

 .48

 .47

 .45

 .36

 .42

INCHES

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

PRECIP

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

JULY 2004 NEW MELONES LAKE DAILY OPERATIONS RUN DATE: August 23, 2004

IN LAKE

EVAPORATION

INCHES

C.F.S.

COMPUTED*

1000 ACRE-FEET

RELEASE - C.F.S.

TOTALS -97.3 15,009 60,614 0 0 3,458 12.89 .00

ACRE-FEET -97,300 29,770 120,228 0 0 6,859

COMMENTS:

* COMPUTED INFLOW IS THE SUM OF CHANGE IN STORAGE, RELEASES AND EVAPORATION.

SUMMARY

RELEASE (ACRE-FEET)

POWER 120,228

SPILL 0

OUTLET

TOTAL

 0

 120,228

PRECIPITATION

THIS MONTH =

TO DATE =

 .00

JULY 1, 2004 .00

 1,302.2

Table 13