alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

DAY HIGH

 24,609

 23,556

 26,947

 23,009

 20,405

 24,594

 25,650

 26,612

 27,784

 25,433

 24,743

 25,639

 22,391

 26,121

 25,183

 22,387

 22,301

 23,657

 24,190

 24,113

 26,833

 28,611

 28,737

 28,739

 28,025

 27,640

 28,100

 26,705

 26,623

 26,669

 8,946

 13,978

 12,879

 10,210

 9,444

 11,190

 11,879

 13,938

 13,293

 9,869

 11,322

 16,063

 12,040

 12,759

 14,713

 9,339

 12,505

 13,118

 14,105

 16,993

 10,536

 14,160

 14,352

 14,476

 19,117

 19,663

 20,502

 20,045

 20,047

 20,080

 18,416

 18,446

 19,231

 16,198

 14,074

 17,880

 17,005

 16,818

 16,974

 14,888

 17,891

 19,849

 15,714

 19,469

 19,334

 16,576

 17,957

 19,325

 19,102

 20,105

 19,323

 22,045

 22,926

 22,805

 24,017

 24,024

 24,267

 24,254

 24,241

 23,872

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

SEPTEMBER 2015 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: October 5, 2015

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

PORT CHICAGO TOP IN SUISUN BAY
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY HIGH

 6,721

 6,640

 6,986

 6,572

 6,199

 6,151

 6,860

 7,036

 7,127

 8,959

 7,847

 6,969

 5,681

 6,468

 6,605

 6,975

 7,176

 7,882

 7,616

 7,466

 6,360

 5,823

 6,226

 7,255

 7,983

 8,653

 9,789

 9,525

 9,181

 8,576

 8,234

 967

 1,110

 1,293

 1,375

 1,240

 1,194

 1,221

 1,315

 1,042

 1,247

 1,424

 1,229

 1,076

 1,021

 1,094

 1,319

 1,487

 1,808

 2,069

 1,699

 1,406

 761

 862

 1,111

 1,247

 1,492

 1,968

 2,712

 3,392

 3,533

 3,231

 3,498

 3,523

 3,758

 3,341

 3,018

 2,827

 3,003

 3,098

 2,959

 3,710

 3,872

 3,312

 3,059

 3,039

 3,226

 3,565

 3,870

 4,049

 4,287

 4,053

 3,169

 2,296

 2,457

 3,707

 4,577

 5,398

 6,010

 6,741

 6,630

 6,271

 5,694

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

OCTOBER 2017 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: November 14, 2017

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

PITTSBURG BOTTOM ON THE SACRAMENTO RIVER
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

DAY HIGH

 17,867

 18,554

 18,317

 17,980

 17,407

 17,121

 17,822

 17,402

 17,669

 18,435

 19,218

 19,480

 21,269

 21,246

 21,424

 22,011

 21,470

 21,726

 20,828

 18,822

 19,103

 19,146

 20,179

 20,786

 20,913

 23,008

 24,725

 24,302

 23,670

 21,781

 3,317

 4,087

 4,997

 5,500

 6,054

 7,521

 8,164

 8,946

 8,126

 7,771

 7,626

 7,750

 8,873

 8,309

 8,272

 7,863

 8,062

 8,656

 9,417

 9,767

 9,106

 9,354

 9,513

 9,931

 9,747

 10,485

 11,255

 11,596

 11,384

 10,866

 10,646

 11,140

 11,992

 12,313

 12,685

 12,787

 13,442

 13,265

 12,909

 13,030

 13,391

 13,917

 15,191

 15,479

 15,174

 15,658

 15,432

 16,120

 16,498

 15,185

 14,464

 14,147

 14,384

 15,042

 15,608

 15,952

 18,058

 17,886

 18,260

 16,867

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

NOVEMBER 2019 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: December 11, 2019

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

PORT CHICAGO BOTTOM IN SUISUN BAY
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY

 59,796

 59,982

 60,069

 60,027

 59,904

 60,320

 60,489

 60,428

 60,085

 59,563

 59,743

 60,130

 60,527

 60,850

 61,248

 61,655

 61,713

 62,263

 63,162

 63,367

 63,300

 63,250

 63,334

 63,720

 63,880

 63,615

 63,338

 63,073

 63,107

 63,636

 63,855

 93,112

 93,642

 94,627

 95,502

 96,137

 96,266

 96,645

 96,774

 96,351

 95,666

 95,118

 95,694

 96,537

 97,162

 97,450

 97,450

 97,457

 97,263

 97,241

 97,363

 97,335

 97,349

 97,385

 97,385

 97,428

 97,528

 97,428

 97,306

 97,234

 97,133

 97,342

STORAGE - A.F. 

 152,908

 153,624

 154,696

 155,529

 156,041

 156,586

 157,134

 157,202

 156,436

 155,229

 154,861

 155,824

 157,064

 158,012

 158,698

 159,105

 159,170

 159,526

 160,403

 160,730

 160,635

 160,599

 160,719

 161,105

 161,308

 161,143

 160,766

 160,379

 160,341

 160,769

 161,197

6,463

5,582

5,468

5,552

5,522

5,338

5,738

5,392

5,207

4,962

4,193

2,910

2,383

2,725

2,838

2,624

2,713

2,828

2,192

2,314

2,516

2,123

1,932

1,737

1,644

1,864

2,018

1,880

3,713

1,507

1,239

6,255

5,943

6,008

5,972

5,780

5,613

6,014

5,426

4,821

4,353

4,007

3,396

3,008

3,203

3,184

2,829

2,746

3,007

2,634

2,479

2,468

2,105

1,992

1,932

1,746

1,781

1,828

1,685

3,694

1,723

1,455

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

JULY 2011 FULL NATURAL FLOW AT NEW MELONES DAM RUN DATE: 08/01/2011

TOTALS +7,877 109,087

* October 1, 216,374

 1,796.2

 1,808.0

 1,819.9

 1,831.7

 1,843.2

 1,854.3

 1,866.2

 1,877.0

 1,886.6

 1,895.2

 1,903.1

 1,909.9

 1,915.8

 1,922.2

 1,928.5

 1,934.1

 1,939.6

 1,945.5

 1,950.8

 1,955.7

 1,960.6

 1,964.8

 1,968.7

 1,972.5

 1,976.0

 1,979.5

 1,983.2

 1,986.5

 1,993.8

 1,997.2

 2,000.1

DONNELLS

RES

BEARDSLEY

RES

2010 TO DATE

NEW

MELONES

INFLOW

C.F.S

NATURAL

RIVER

C.F.S

ACCUM *

FULL

NATURAL

1000 A.F.

RESERVOIR

TOTAL

-412

+716

+1,072

+833

+512

+545

+548

+68

-766

-1,207

-368

+963

+1,240

+948

+686

+407

+65

+356

+877

+327

-95

-36

+120

+386

+203

-165

-377

-387

-38

+428

+428

CHANGE

A.F. C.F.S.

-208

+361

+540

+420

+258

+275

+276

+34

-386

-609

-186

+486

+625

+478

+346

+205

+33

+179

+442

+165

-48

-18

+60

+195

+102

-83

-190

-195

-19

+216

+216
#### THE BRIG CONCORD, Taylor, master.

1815. March 11th.

*dbsenL,..Torn}, J,*

THIS was an appeal from the sentence of the Circuit Court, affirming that.of the .District Court, whicji re" stored 1o the Claimants,, neutral Spanish merchants at Teneriffe, 20 pipes of -wine, part of the cargo of the British brig Concord, captured by the American privateer Marengo, in August, 1812, *without payment of duties;*although the same had been,- by consent of proctors for the parties, sold under an order of. the Court.

if captured f00^’ neutral owner,”be by consent sold . of the Court^ and afterwards Court, thé proceeds are prdered to be restored to such owner, the amount of the duties due to the u.s.upop the importation of the goods must « Paid-

The cause being submitted without argument;

Story, J.

delivered the opinion of the Court, as fol- . I0WS •

This is the ,case ot a stnpment made by' a neutral house on board of a British ship which was captured, on a voyage fr,om Teneriffe to London, by the private armed ship Marengo, and brought into the port of New *388York for adjudication. Pending the prize proceedings, the goods were sold by an interlocutory order of the District Court, and the proceeds brought into the registry. Upon the . hearing, the property was decreed to be restored to the claimants without payment of duties *;*and this decree was afterwards affirmed in the Circuit Court. The cause has been brought, by appeal, to this Court for a final decision.

We are all of opinion that the proprietary interest of tjie claimants is completely proved *;*and therefore the decree of restoration must be affirmed.

With respect to the duties, we are all of opinion that the decree of the Courts below was erroneous. Where goods are brought.b'y superior force, or by inevitable ne- . cessity, into the United States, they are not deemed to he so imported, in the sense of the law, as necessarily to attach the right to duties. If, however, such goods are afterwards sold or consumed in the country, or incorporated into the general mass of its property, they become retro-actively liable to the payment of duties. In the present case, if the goods had been specifically restored* and afterwards withdrawn from the United States by the. Claimants, they would haye beenexempt from duties. But having been sold, by order of the Court, for the general benefit, the duties indissolubly attached, and'ought to have been deducted from the proceeds by the Courts below. The decree in this resnéct must be reversed.'
David A. Monroe, E-Watch 

Corporation, E-Watch, Inc., 

and The Telesis Group, Inc., /s

Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

September 23, 2015

No. 04-15-00435-CV

AUGLLE, L.L.C., Wrap It Up, L.L.C., James A. McVey, Jr., Individually, and Valdis Karlis 

Gravis Krumins, Individually,

Appellants

v.

David A. MONROE, E-Watch Corporation, E-Watch, Inc., and The Telesis Group, Inc., each 

Individually and as Member of Power Surveillance Corporation, L.L.C.,

Appellees

From the 225th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2015-CI-07230

Honorable Gloria Saldana, Judge Presiding

ORDER

Appellants' unopposed motion to suspend the appellate deadlines for a period of sixty 

days is granted in part and denied in part. We order that either a motion disposing of this appeal 

or appellants' brief is due on October 26, 2015.

_________________________________

Luz Elena D. Chapa, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said 

court on this 23rd day of September, 2015.

___________________________________

Keith E. Hottle

Clerk of Court
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Leonard SCHEER, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 05-10564.

Conference Calendar.

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.

Decided Feb. 23, 2006.

Susan B. Cowger, Larry Edward Jarrett, Assistant U.S. Attorney, Dallas, TX, for Plaintiff-Appellee.

Douglas A. Morris, Dallas, TX, for Defendant-Appellant.

Before GARZA, DENNIS, and PRADO, Circuit Judges.

*629PER CURIAM: *

Leonard Seheer appeals his 120-month sentence following his guilty plea to being a felon in possession of a firearm. He seeks to challenge his sentence in light of *United States v. Booker,*543 U.S. 220, 125 S.Ct. 738, 160 L.Ed.2d 621 (2005). Seheer first avers that the district court erred by not incorporating, through “reverse incorporation,” the Ex Post Facto Clause into the Due Process Clause of the Fifth Amendment. He contends that such incorporation would protect defendants like him, whose offenses were committed prior to *Booker,*by prohibiting the court from imposing a greater sentence under the now advisory guideline scheme than was permitted under the mandatory guideline scheme.

This argument is foreclosed. *See United States v. Austin,*432 F.3d 598, 599-600 (5th Cir.2005).

Seheer makes the related arguments that the district court violated his right to “fair notice under the Due Process Clause of the Fifth Amendment” by enhancing his sentence based on facts that were not charged in the indictment and were neither admitted by him nor found by a jury beyond a reasonable doubt. Seheer contends that the remedial portion of *Booker’s*holding may not be applied in his case without violating the Due Process and Ex Post Facto Clauses. Seheer thus argues that the district court should have applied the Sentencing Guidelines as mandatory in his case but should not have enhanced his sentence based on facts that were not charged in the indictment and were neither admitted by him nor found by a jury beyond a reasonable doubt. Seheer recognizes that this court has rejected these arguments.

Scheer’s arguments are foreclosed. *See United States v. Mares,*402 F.3d 511, 519 (5th Cir.) (the “sentencing judge is entitled to find by a preponderance of the evidence all facts relevant to the determination of a Guideline sentencing range and all facts relevant to the determination of a non-Guideline sentence”), *cert. denied,*— U.S. -, 126 S.Ct. 43, 163 L.Ed.2d 76 (2005); *see also Austin,*432 F.3d at 599-600. The judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.

*

 Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.
§ 322.4 Consideration of evidence. ( a ) *Initial proof.* A claimant's certification that he or she did not work on any day claimed and did not receive income such as vacation pay or pay for time lost for any such day shall constitute sufficient evidence for an initial finding that no remuneration is payable or has accrued to him or her with respect to such day, unless a base year employer reports that he or she worked on days claimed or received payments that constitute remuneration as defined in this part, or unless there is other conflicting evidence.
( b ) *Investigation.* When there is a question as to whether or not remuneration is payable or has accrued to a claimant with respect to a claimed day or days, investigation shall be made with a view to obtaining information sufficient for a finding.
(Approved by the Office of Management and Budget under control number 3220-0049) [Board Order 59-73, 24 FR 2487, Mar. 31, 1959, as amended at 52 FR 11017, Apr. 6, 1987; 65 FR 14460, Mar. 17, 2000]
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

DAY HIGH

 484

 477

 465

 461

 466

 466

 468

 480

 477

 478

 477

 477

 581

 607

 577

 549

 555

 536

 561

 554

 510

 535

 545

 471

 457

 425

 420

 424

 415

 441

 454

 461

 460

 454

 456

 447

 402

 454

 456

 464

 445

 455

 461

 513

 488

 443

 413

 398

 377

 373

 354

 345

 343

 335

 335

 331

 335

 328

 319

 312

 473

 470

 463

 458

 460

 460

 458

 467

 466

 470

 462

 469

 510

 556

 531

 484

 469

 435

 429

 413

 388

 387

 381

 371

 363

 355

 355

 350

 341

 335

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

JUNE 2007 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: July 9, 2007

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

DELTA MENDOTA CANAL AT CHECK 13 (O'NEILL)
Exhibit 32.1

                                   Vicom, Inc.

                Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350
                             As Adopted Pursuant to
                  Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

      In connection with this Quarterly Report Form 10-Q, Multiband  Corporation
(the  "Company")  for the period ended June 30, 2004, I, James L. Mandel,  Chief
Executive Officer of the Company, hereby certify,  pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
1350,  as adopted  pursuant  to Section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002,
that:

      1.    This Periodic Report fully complies with the requirements of section
            13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m
            or 78o(d)); and

      2.    The information contained in the Periodic Report fairly presents, in
            all  material  respects,  the  financial  condition  and  results of
            operations of the Company.


Date: August 19, 2004                                By:
                                                         -----------------------
                                                         /s/ James L. Mandel
                                                         Chief Executive Officer

      In connection with this Quarterly Report Form 10-Q, Multiband  Corporation
(the "Company") for the period ended June 30, 2004, I, Steven M. Bell, Secretary
and  Treasurer of the Company,  hereby  certify,  pursuant to 18 U.S.C.  Section
1350,  as adopted  pursuant  to Section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002,
that:

      1.    This Periodic Report fully complies with the requirements of section
            13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m
            or 78o(d)); and

      2.    The information contained in the Periodic Report fairly presents, in
            all  material  respects,  the  financial  condition  and  results of
            operations of the Company.

Date: August 19, 2004                                By:
                                                        ------------------------
                                                        /s/ Steven M. Bell
                                                        Chief Financial Officer
#### § 771.80 Revocation or denial of renewal.

In hearings on the revocation or denial of renewal of a license or permit, the burden of proof is on the Government to show that the Director of Industry Operations had reason to believe that the licensee or permittee is not entitled to a permit or license, as may be the case. The Government must meet this proof by a preponderance of the evidence.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

DAY

 12,847

 13,646

 14,041

 14,895

 14,976

 14,967

 15,153

 15,303

 15,289

 15,147

 15,211

 14,934

 14,962

 14,978

 14,705

 14,424

 14,101

 14,101

 14,945

 16,260

 18,040

 20,034

 22,385

 24,022

 24,829

 25,495

 26,172

 26,981

 27,524

 28,065

 52,014

 52,280

 52,826

 52,524

 52,991

 53,683

 54,447

 55,123

 55,667

 56,155

 56,318

 56,884

 57,458

 58,247

 58,927

 59,420

 60,092

 60,911

 61,589

 62,560

 63,658

 64,696

 65,446

 66,413

 67,082

 67,572

 67,593

 68,264

 68,751

 69,222

STORAGE - A.F. 

 64,861

 65,926

 66,867

 67,419

 67,967

 68,650

 69,600

 70,426

 70,956

 71,302

 71,529

 71,818

 72,420

 73,225

 73,632

 73,844

 74,193

 75,012

 76,534

 78,820

 81,698

 84,730

 87,831

 90,435

 91,911

 93,067

 93,765

 95,245

 96,275

 97,287

1,574

1,648

1,831

1,598

1,628

1,623

1,650

1,850

1,751

1,581

1,543

1,434

1,601

1,727

1,737

1,411

1,533

1,684

1,788

2,269

2,568

2,280

1,953

2,191

1,972

1,741

1,655

1,617

1,755

1,651

2,016

2,185

2,305

1,876

1,904

1,967

2,129

2,266

2,018

1,755

1,657

1,580

1,905

2,133

1,942

1,518

1,709

2,097

2,555

3,422

4,019

3,809

3,516

3,504

2,716

2,324

2,007

2,363

2,274

2,161

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

APRIL 2009 FULL NATURAL FLOW AT NEW MELONES DAM RUN DATE: 05/01/2009

TOTALS +33,303 69,632

* October 1, 138,115

 325.7

 330.0

 334.6

 338.3

 342.1

 346.0

 350.2

 354.7

 358.7

 362.2

 365.5

 368.6

 372.4

 376.7

 380.5

 383.5

 386.9

 391.1

 396.1

 402.9

 410.9

 418.4

 425.4

 432.4

 437.8

 442.4

 446.3

 451.0

 455.5

 459.8

DONNELLS

RES

BEARDSLEY

RES

2008 TO DATE

NEW

MELONES

INFLOW

C.F.S

NATURAL

RIVER

C.F.S

ACCUM *

FULL

NATURAL

1000 A.F.

RESERVOIR

TOTAL

+877

+1,065

+941

+552

+548

+683

+950

+826

+530

+346

+227

+289

+602

+805

+407

+212

+349

+819

+1,522

+2,286

+2,878

+3,032

+3,101

+2,604

+1,476

+1,156

+698

+1,480

+1,030

+1,012

CHANGE

A.F. C.F.S.

+442

+537

+474

+278

+276

+344

+479

+416

+267

+174

+114

+146

+304

+406

+205

+107

+176

+413

+767

+1,153

+1,451

+1,529

+1,563

+1,313

+744

+583

+352

+746

+519

+510
May 5, 1977
STATE OF WASHINGTON DEPARTMENT OF ECOLOGY
SOURCE TEST LABORATORY PROCEDURE 4
DICHLOROMETHANE EXTRACTION OF FILTERS I. Principle The weight of inorganic solid particulate collected on a filter is determined after extraction using dichloromethane. II. Equipment 1. An analytical balance to weigh weighing dish + 0.l mg.
2. Soxhlet extractor.
3. Oven to maintain 105 o + 5 o C.
4. Desiccator. III Reagents 1. Dichloromethane (CH2C12) Nanograde (or equivalent). 2. Cellulose extraction thimble (or equivalent).
IV. Procedures Pre-extract thimbles in a soxhlet ap paratus for at least two hours. Place preweighed filters in the thimble and dry at 105 C for at least four hours. Desiccate until cool and weigh to constant weight. Extract in a soxhlet extractor for at least six hours and repeat drying and weighing procedures. Run a blank for at least every series of the an alysis, or every five samples.
V. Calibration
The balance should be zeroed before each weighing and calibrated at least every eighteen months with an NBS standard.
VI. Calculations The weight of the extractables is the difference between the initial and final weight of the thimble and filter, and the weight of the solid inorganic particulate is the weight of the total part iculate minus the extractables.
### **CHAPTER 5—VIRUSES, SERUMS, TOXINS, ANTITOXINS, AND ANALOGOUS PRODUCTS**

Sec.
151.
Preparation and sale of worthless or harmful products for domestic animals prohibited; preparation to be in compliance with rules at licensed establishments.
152.
Importation regulated and prohibited.
153.
Inspection of imports; denial of entry and destruction.
154.
Regulations for preparation and sale; licenses.
154a.
Special licenses for special circumstances; expedited procedure; conditions; exemptions; criteria.
155.
Permits for importation.
156.
Licenses conditioned on permitting inspection; suspension of licenses.
157.
Inspection.
158.
Offenses; punishment.
159.
Enforcement; penalties applicable; Congressional findings.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act

Nothing contained in chapter 9 (§301 et seq.) of this title shall be construed as in any way affecting, modifying, repealing, or superseding the provisions of this chapter, see section 392(b) of this title.
#### § 1002.3 When did USERRA become effective?

USERRA became law on October 13, 1994. USERRA's reemployment provisions apply to members of the uniformed services seeking civilian reemployment on or after December 12, 1994. USERRA's anti-discrimination and anti-retaliation provisions became effective on October 13, 1994.
### SUBCHAPTER IV–A—INSPECTIONS BY FEDERAL AND STATE AGENCIES
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

DAY HIGH

 9,939

 17,012

 13,148

 11,524

 11,078

 11,545

 15,283

 15,256

 14,514

 10,221

 15,467

 14,746

 13,955

 12,393

 9,475

 7,718

 8,233

 8,798

 12,165

 15,111

 17,190

 20,653

 21,550

 23,207

 20,679

 22,017

 22,829

 21,711

 19,003

 16,883

 1,105

 3,270

 2,325

 2,312

 3,097

 4,872

 5,887

 5,719

 4,674

 4,196

 3,406

 2,278

 2,057

 1,933

 1,343

 1,052

 975

 2,535

 4,172

 6,384

 8,359

 8,678

 8,880

 6,622

 5,380

 4,911

 5,847

 5,341

 4,059

 3,308

 4,721

 9,388

 8,366

 7,345

 7,303

 8,276

 9,963

 10,119

 9,421

 7,623

 8,956

 7,589

 7,273

 6,772

 5,649

 4,302

 4,740

 5,488

 6,908

 9,257

 11,122

 12,860

 14,294

 13,592

 12,737

 12,486

 13,843

 12,835

 11,272

 9,758

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

APRIL 2009 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: May 1, 2009

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

PORT CHICAGO TOP IN SUISUN BAY