alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
chyl_ex1010.htm

EXHIBIT 10.10
  
 Note: The agreement is limited to the transfer and transferee, and if the number of shareholders is large, it can be copied
  
 Shaanxi Jinjiangshan Health Technology Development Co.Ltd
 Shareholders' Resolution
  
 Regarding the change of the type of the enterprise, the change of the investor (equity) filing resolution:
  
 According to the "Company Law" and the Articles of Association of the Company, the Company held the third shareholders meeting on June 1st, 2018. The meeting convener Yang Miao, all shareholders attended the meeting, representing, 100% of the voting rights, represented by the 100% voting shareholder passed the following resolutions:
  
 1. After the shareholder changes (or capital increase), the new shareholder contribution structure of the company is as follows:
  
 (1) Yang Miao subscribed for 2 million Yuan, and the capital contribution method is: currency, capital contribution time: November 13th , 2037;
  
 (2) Guan Shenghui subscribed for 1million Yuan, and the capital contribution method is: currency, capital contribution time: November 13th , 2037;
  
 (3) Shaanxi JinJiangshan Senior Living Service Management Co., Ltd. subscribed for 7 million Yuan, and the capital contribution method is: currency. capital contribution time: November 13th , 2037;
  
 2. Consent on:
  
 (1) Transfer 40% of shares hold by Wuyidian under Shaanxi Jinjiangshan Health Technology Development Co., Ltd. to Shaanxi Jinjiangshan senior living Service Management Co., Ltd. at the price of 4 million Yuan.
  
 (2) Transfer 30% of shares hold by YangMiao under Shaanxi Jinjiangshan Health Technology Development Co., Ltd. to Shaanxi Jinjiangshan senior living Service Management Co., Ltd. at the price of 3million Yuan.
  
 It is agreed to amend the articles of association of the above changes and authorize the legal representative of the company to sign the revised articles of association or amendments to the articles of association.
  
  
  
  
  
 (Note: signature of the natural person shareholder (all shareholders), the legal person shareholder is stamped and signed by the legal representative of the company)
#### Frank Allenza, as Administrator, etc., Respondent, v. The Erie Railroad Company, Appellant.

Judgment and order affirmed, with costs. All concurred.
Exhibit 23.1  Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm  The
Board of Directors Centennial
Bank Holdings, Inc.:  We
consent to the incorporation by reference in the registration statements on Form S-8
(No. 333-127456) and Form S-8 (No. 333-134950) of Centennial
Bank Holdings, Inc. of our report dated February 26, 2008, with
respect to the consolidated financial statements of Centennial Bank Holdings, Inc.
and the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting which report
appears in this Annual Report on Form 10-K of Centennial Bank Holdings, Inc.
for the year ended December 31, 2007.  /s/
  Crowe Chizek and Company LLCOakbrook,
  IllinoisFebruary 29,
  2008
### §§8821 to 8826. Repealed. Pub. L. 107–110, title X, §1011(5)(C), Jan. 8, 2002, 115 Stat. 1986

Section 8821, Pub. L. 89–10, title XIV, §14201, as added Pub. L. 103–382, title I, §101, Oct. 20, 1994, 108 Stat. 3890, related to consolidation of State administrative funds for elementary and secondary education programs.

Section 8822, Pub. L. 89–10, title XIV, §14202, as added Pub. L. 103–382, title I, §101, Oct. 20, 1994, 108 Stat. 3891, related to single local educational agency States.

Section 8823, Pub. L. 89–10, title XIV, §14203, as added Pub. L. 103–382, title I, §101, Oct. 20, 1994, 108 Stat. 3892, related to consolidation of funds for local administration.

Section 8824, Pub. L. 89–10, title XIV, §14204, as added Pub. L. 103–382, title I, §101, Oct. 20, 1994, 108 Stat. 3892, related to administrative funds studies.

Section 8825, Pub. L. 89–10, title XIV, §14205, as added Pub. L. 103–382, title I, §101, Oct. 20, 1994, 108 Stat. 3893; amended Pub. L. 106–400, §2, Oct. 30, 2000, 114 Stat. 1675, related to consolidated set-aside for Department of the Interior funds.

Section 8826, Pub. L. 89–10, title XIV, §14206, as added Pub. L. 103–382, title I, §101, Oct. 20, 1994, 108 Stat. 3894, related to availability of unneeded program funds.
### §7911. Prohibition on nationwide database

Nothing in this chapter (other than section 6398(b) of this title) shall be construed to authorize the development of a nationwide database of personally identifiable information on individuals involved in studies or other collections of data under this chapter.

(Pub. L. 89–10, title VIII, §8531, formerly title IX, §9531, as added Pub. L. 107–110, title IX, §901, Jan. 8, 2002, 115 Stat. 1984; renumbered title VIII, §8531, Pub. L. 114–95, title VIII, §8001(a)(6), Dec. 10, 2015, 129 Stat. 2088, 2089.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Prior Provisions

A prior section 7911, Pub. L. 89–10, title IX, §9211, as added Pub. L. 103–382, title I, §101, Oct. 20, 1994, 108 Stat. 3804, set out administrative provisions, prior to the general amendment of former subchapter IX of this chapter by Pub. L. 107–110.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

DAY HIGH

 4,074

 4,453

 3,982

 5,505

 5,820

 6,736

 5,661

 6,892

 5,718

 5,908

 5,382

 5,241

 5,514

 5,878

 5,066

 5,293

 4,638

 4,150

 4,558

 4,989

 5,403

 5,915

 5,624

 4,783

 4,471

 8,645

 9,819

 7,938

 9,108

 9,130

 1,518

 1,587

 1,721

 1,951

 2,234

 2,349

 2,178

 2,535

 2,174

 1,821

 1,533

 1,393

 1,409

 1,304

 1,341

 1,292

 1,267

 1,131

 1,311

 1,280

 1,428

 1,391

 1,452

 1,440

 1,194

 1,083

 2,087

 2,009

 2,243

 2,538

 2,773

 2,826

 2,896

 3,474

 3,596

 3,771

 3,573

 3,920

 3,702

 3,141

 2,927

 2,890

 2,987

 2,847

 2,587

 2,584

 2,360

 2,203

 2,341

 2,478

 2,627

 2,823

 3,175

 2,775

 2,580

 4,256

 5,078

 4,637

 4,887

 5,352

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

SEPTEMBER 2005 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: October 4, 2005

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

PITTSBURG TOP ON THE SACRAMENTO RIVER
1 Hon orable Pat Pr iest , Jr. , Se ni or Judge Si tting by Assi gnment, presi ding over the

Appellant’s plea of guilty.

2 And ers v. California , 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). NO. 07- 06-02 92-CR IN THE COURT O F APPEALS FOR THE SEVENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

AT AMARILLO PANEL C DECEMBER 19, 2006

____________

____________

______ STEVE GEORGE SETTLES, APPELLANT

V. THE STATE OF TEXAS, APPELLEE

____________

____________

_________ FROM THE 2 90TH D ISTRI CT COURT OF B EXAR COUNTY

CAUSE NO. 2005CR3072 HONORABLE SHARON MACRAE, JUDGE PRESI DING 1

____________

____________

_______ Before QUINN, C.J., and HANCOCK and PIRTLE, JJ.
MEMOR AND UM OPI NION
Follow ing an open plea of guilty, Appell ant, Steve George Sett les, was con victed o f two counts of aggravated sex ual assa ult of a chil d and sentenced to l ife i mpr i so nme nt. In presenti ng thi s appeal , counsel has fil ed an Anders 2 brief in suppo rt of a m otion to withdraw.

### 2

We g r an tc ou ns el ’ s mot i on a nd a ffi r m. In supp ort ofher m otion to withdraw, counsel certi fies that shehas dil igentl y rev iewed the record , and in her opi nion, the recor d refle cts no re versi ble er ror upon whi ch an appeal can be predicated. And ers v. California , 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct . 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1 967); Monroe v. State , 671 S.W.2d 583, 585 ( Tex.App.–San Antonio 1984, no pet.) . Thus, she conclude s the appeal is fri volous. In com plia nce wi th High v. State , 573 S.W.2d 807, 813 (Tex.Cr. App. 1978) , coun sel h as ca ndidl y disc ussed why , under the contr olli ng author iti es, there is no e rror i n the trial court' s judgment. Counsel has als o sho wn that shesent a co py of the brief to appel lant a nd infor med appell ant that , in h er vi ew, t he appeal is w ithout merit. In additi on, counsel has demonstrated that shenotifi ed appel lant of his r ight to revi ew therecord and filea pro serespo nse ifhe des ired to d o so. A ppellan t did not file a res pons e. Neith er did the State fa vor us wi th a b rie f.
We have re viewe d the ar guable g round addr

essed by counsel to determine w hether there was any e rror whic h cou ld plaus ibly supp ort an a ppea l. W e have als o conducte d an independ entreview of the entire record. See Pen son v . Ohio , 488 U.S. 75, 109 S.Ct . 346, 1 02 L.Ed.2d 300 (1988); Bledsoe v. State , 178 S.W.3d 824 (Tex.Cr.A pp. 2005). Ho wever, we have found no re versi ble er ror and agree w ith co unsel t hat the appeal i s frivolous.
Accordi ngly, cou nsel's m otion to withdraw is h ereby g rante d, and the trial c ourt’s judgment is affi rmed.
Patr ick A. Pirtle Just ice Do not publish.
Tyler Hammond

SkySource Imaging 1299 N. US Highway 231 Spencer, IN 47460



### The proposed exemption, if granted, would allow SkySource Imaging to conduct commercial operations of small unmanned aircraft systems ("UAS") meeting or exceeding all of the operational and safety requirements Congress has set forth in Section 333.

**Specific Sections in which SKYSOURCE IMAGING is seeking an exemption**  : IN THE MATTER OF THE PETITION FOR EXEMPTION OF : SKYSOURCE IMAGING FOR AN EXEMPTION SEEKING RELIEF FROM THE REQUIREMENTS OF TITLE 14 OF THE CODE OF FEDERAL REGULATIONS SECTIONS 61.113(a) & (b), 91.7(a), 91.121, 91.151(b), 91.405(a), 91.409(a)(1) & (a)(2), and 91.417(a) & (b) CONCERNING COMMERCIAL OPERATION OF A DJI PHANTOM 3 UNMANNED AIRCRAFT SYSTEM PURSUANT TO SECTION 333 OF THE FAA MONDERNIZATION AND REFORM ACT OF 2012 (PUBLIC LAW 112

- 95)
**Extent of relief and my reason for seeking relief**  : In order to use my Unmanned Aircraft System for commercial use. I am seeking this exemption in order to legally conduct business and comply with all Federal regulations and standards put fort h by the FAA while operating my Unmanned Aircraft System

. **How my request wou ld benefit the**  **public and community** : Granting the p etition for SKYSOURCE IMAGING would allow for me to be able to efficiently, legally, economically, and safely perform aerial vide o and photography of real estate, sporting events, agricultural land surveying and mapping , special events and festivals , commercial inspections, and commercial maintenance over cert ain areas of Indiana and surrounding states . Using an Unmanned Aircraft System such as drone technology would greatly reduce negative impacts on the environment and also provide a safer alternative for businesses to conduct land and equipment inspections.
**Reasons why the exemption would not adversely affect safety, or how the exemption would provide a level of safety at least** **equal to the existing rule** : By adhering t o guidelines set

forth by the FAA I would not be going above the recommended altitude nor flying at night , therefore avoiding any haza rdous
a ccidents such as coll iding with a manned aircraft. I will be regularly test flying and doing daily maintena nce logs to ensure my Phantom 3 is in proper working order for each job or event as to prevent damage or bodily injury.

**Summary to publish in the Federal Register stating**

-- 1. SEEKING RELIEF FROM THE REQUIREMENTS OF TITLE 14 OF THE CODE OF FEDERAL REGULATIONS S ECTIONS 61.113(a) & (b), 91.7(a), 91.121, 91.151(b), 91.405(a), 91.409(a)(1) & (a)(2), and 91.417(a) & (b) CONCERNING COMMERCIAL OPERATION OF DJI PHANTOM 3 UNMANNED AIRCRAFT SYSTEM PURSUANT TO SECTION 333 OF THE FAA MONDERNIZATION AND REFORM ACT OF 2012 (PUBLIC LAW 112

- 95) 2. I am seeki ng exemption in order to use my UAS for commercial use.

Tyler Hammond SkySource Imaging 1299 N. US Highway 231 Spencer, IN 47460 twhammond@yahoo.com
EXHIBIT 32.1







CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002






Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, in connection with the filing of the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the Year Ended December 31, 2010 (the "Report") by People’s Liberation, Inc. ("Registrant"), the undersigned hereby certifies that:




1.
The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




2.
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Registrant.



















Date:  March 31, 2011
/s/ Colin Dyne

Colin Dyne

Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer

(Principal Executive, Financial and Accounting Officer)











A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Peoples Liberation, Inc.  and will be retained by Peoples Liberation, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
| 1. | This      Periodic Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or      15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d));      and |
|----|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| 2. | The      information contained in the Periodic Report fairly presents, in all      material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of      the Company. |
|----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| Date:      May 20, 2009 | By:    |                         |
|-------------------------|--------|------------------------------|
|                    |   |                         |
|                    |   | /s/      Steven M. Bell      |
|                    |   | Chief      Financial Officer |

----
### §1055. Authorization of appropriations

Such sums as are necessary to carry out the provisions of this chapter are hereby authorized to be appropriated.

(Pub. L. 91–597, §27, Dec. 29, 1970, 84 Stat. 1635.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

This chapter, referred to in text, was in the original "this Act", meaning Pub. L. 91–597, Dec. 29, 1970, 84 Stat. 1620, which is classified principally to this chapter. For complete classification of this Act to the Code, see Short Title note set out under section 1031 of this title and Tables.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date

For effective date of this section, see section 29 of Pub. L. 91–597, set out as a note under section 1031 of this title.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY ELEVATION

 244.21

 243.86

 243.25

 242.60

 241.46

 241.20

 241.22

 247.47

 243.11

 244.84

 241.96

 241.37

 240.81

 240.41

 240.32

 240.29

 240.27

 240.21

 240.19

 240.19

 240.09

 239.97

 239.90

 239.67

 239.55

 239.47

 239.45

 239.77

 240.00

 239.86

 239.77

 1,175

 1,103

 985

 867

 679

 639

 642

 1,982

 957

 1,311

 757

 665

 582

 527

 514

 510

 507

 499

 496

 496

 482

 466

 458

 430

 416

 406

 404

 442

 470

 453

 442

STORAGE

+300

-72

-118

-118

-188

-40

+3

+1,340

-1,025

+354

-554

-92

-83

-55

-13

-4

-3

-8

-3

+0

-14

-16

-8

-28

-14

-10

-2

+38

+28

-17

-11

CHANGE

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 15

 30

 30

 32,186

 25,425

 22,329

 18,498

 17,681

 16,138

 17,850

 19,436

 21,874

 42,915

 18,734

 16,226

 13,672

 12,119

 11,936

 11,864

 11,735

 11,642

 11,537

 11,422

 11,006

 10,174

 9,648

 9,032

 8,745

 8,111

 7,862

 10,974

 11,426

 10,114

 9,763

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

JANUARY 2004 RED BLUFF DIVERSION RESERVOIR DAILY OPERATIONS RUN DATE: February 12, 2004

IN LAKE

CANAL

 ACRE-FEET

TOTALS -433 75 472,074

ACRE-FEET -433 149 936,359

SUMMARY

RELEASE (ACRE-FEET)

TOTAL 936,508

 875

RELEASE

RIVER

CORNING TO SACTO

CANAL

RELEASE C.F.S

TEHAMA

COLUSA

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

CORNING CANAL 0

TEHAMA-COLUSA CANAL 149

TO SACTO RIVER 936,359

Table 9
#### § 1011.220 How will VETS verify a HIRE Vets Medallion Award application?

VETS will verify all information provided by an employer in its application to the extent that such information is relevant in determining whether or not such employer meets the criteria to receive a HIRE Vets Medallion Award or in determining the appropriate level of HIRE Vets Medallion Award for that employer to receive. VETS will verify this information by reviewing all information provided as part of the application.
EXHIBIT 32.2

[LETTERHEAD]

Written Statement of the Chief Financial Officer

I, Jay M. Gratz, as Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of Ryerson Inc. (the Company), state and certify that this Form
10-K/A (Amendment No. 1 to Form 10-K) of Ryerson Inc. fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained in this Form 10-K/A (Amendment No. 1 to Form 10-K)
for the period ended December 31, 2006, fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                                                  
|--------------------------------------------------
|/s/ Jay M. Gratz                                  
|Jay M. Gratz                                      
|Executive Vice President & Chief Financial Officer
|(Principal Financial Officer)                     
|April 30, 2007
p.1 

OAR Box 1828 

Prepped by Ollie Stewart 

Document Number: 

211) M-K-(I)-24 

Docket Number: 

A-83-27 

Printed 11/12/2008 11:12:55 AM Sheet 211 of 325 
P.2 

_\_gj 

II-K-(I)-24 

DISCUSSION PAPER ON THE SELECTION OF ENERGY SCENARIOS 

TO EVALUATE THE INDUSTRIAL BOILER NSPS. 

EEA, Inc. 

March 28, 1979. 

THIS INFORMATION CAN BE FOUND IN DOCKET A-79-02, ITEM 

II-K-(I)-24
### Part B—Colors
### D ISTRICT 

### C OURT 

### O F 

### APPEAL 

### O F 

### F LORIDA 

### S ECOND 

### D ISTRICT

GRACIE NAVARETTE as personal representative of the Estate of Antonio Navarette, deceased,

Appellant, v. BRACE INTEGRATED SERVICES, INC. and RANDALE AMMON, Appellees. No. 2D22-200 September 6, 2023 Appeal from the Circuit Court for Hillsborough County; Emily A. Peacock, Judge. Stephen A. Barnes, John V. Trujillo, Jr., Christopher J. Donegan, Adam D. Rieth, Mason B. Binkley, and Valerie L. Leatherwood of Barnes Trial Group, Tampa, for Appellant. Forrest L. Andrews of Lydecker LLP, Miami, for Appellees. PER CURIAM. Affirmed. SLEET, C.J., and VILLANTI and BLACK, JJ., Concur. Opinion subject to revision prior to official publication.
Exhibit 10a

                    AMERITECH CORPORATION
                              
      NON-EMPLOYEE DIRECTORS' TRAVEL ACCIDENT INSURANCE


Limit of Coverage:  $1,000,000 ($10,500,000 aggregate per occurrence)

Premium:       $53,000 (Three year)

Term:          Three years

Renewal Date:  June 9, 1999

Policyholder:  Ameritech Corporation

Provided by:   Hartford Life Insurance Company

Policy No.:    ETB-107130



Coverage is of the broadest, all-risk Business Travel
Insurance type - 24 hours a day while on a business trip.
Coverage starts when the Directors leave their home or place
of employment and continues until their return.  It covers
almost all forms of air travel plus travel on railroads,
ships, buses, subways, taxis, private and rented cars.  It
is not restricted to conveyance accidents but includes a
wide variety of accidents that may occur - even accidents
resulting from personal or recreational activities engaged
in during a business trip.

The policy provides for payment of up to $1,000,000 per
Director for accidental death and dismemberment.  An
aggregate limit of $10,500,000 applies per any one accident.
Coverage is provided while the Director is on assignment, or
at the direction of Ameritech, for the purpose of furthering
the business of Ameritech Corporation.  Coverage is not
provided for travel to and from work, bona fide leaves of
absence and vacations.  Also, coverage is not provided while
an aircraft is engaged in extra-hazardous activity or when a
Director operates, is learning to operate, or is serving as
a crewmember of a conveyance at the time of accident.

Directors may designate a beneficiary, or benefits may be
assigned in accordance with the Payment of Claims provision.
Otherwise, insurance under this policy is not assignable.

Premium is charged as a corporate expense.
```

[Congressional Bills 114th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 3990 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

114th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 3990

   To amend the Small Business Act to provide grants for university 
                          business incubators.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            November 5, 2015

 Mr. Swalwell of California (for himself, Mr. Gallego, Mr. Peters, Mr. 
    Jeffries, Mr. Kilmer, and Mr. Murphy of Florida) introduced the 
 following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Small Business

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
   To amend the Small Business Act to provide grants for university 
                          business incubators.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Start-up America's Students Act''.

SEC. 2. UNIVERSITY BUSINESS INCUBATOR GRANT PROGRAM.

    The Small Business Act (15 U.S.C. 631 et seq.) is amended--
            (1) by redesignating section 47 as section 48; and
            (2) by inserting after section 46 the following:

``SEC. 47. UNIVERSITY BUSINESS INCUBATORS.

    ``(a) Grants.--The Administrator, in consultation with the 
Secretary of Education, shall award grants, on a competitive basis, to 
eligible institutions for the purpose of establishing, maintaining, 
expanding, and improving business incubators operated by or affiliated 
with such eligible institutions.
    ``(b) Applications.--An eligible institution desiring a grant under 
this section shall prepare and submit to the Administrator an 
application, at such time, in such manner, and containing such 
information as the Administrator, in consultation with the Secretary of 
Education, may require.
    ``(c) Definitions.--In this section:
            ``(1) Business incubator.--The term `business incubator' 
        means a facility that is primarily used to provide space where 
        start-up businesses--
                    ``(A) share space, support staff or services, 
                physical resources, or overhead expenses; and
                    ``(B) receive technical assistance, financial 
                advice, or business planning services.
            ``(2) Eligible institution.--The term `eligible 
        institution' means an institution of higher education (as 
        defined in section 102 of the Higher Education Act of 1965 (20 
        U.S.C. 1002)) with a program participation agreement under 
        section 487 of such Act (20 U.S.C. 1094).
            ``(3) Start-up business.--The term `start-up business' 
        means a small business concern that--
                    ``(A) has 10 or fewer employees; and
                    ``(B) has been in operation for less than four 
                years.''.
                                 <all>
```