alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY HIGH

 6,226

 6,049

 5,665

 6,066

 6,332

 5,926

 6,790

 6,583

 6,443

 6,575

 6,754

 5,396

 5,621

 5,922

 6,495

 7,914

 7,199

 7,449

 7,276

 6,757

 5,642

 4,867

 3,935

 3,199

 1,696

 585

 412

 319

 243

 930

 205

 1,743

 1,562

 1,398

 1,584

 1,549

 1,719

 1,730

 1,951

 2,009

 2,037

 2,193

 2,206

 1,839

 2,037

 2,313

 2,789

 2,249

 2,107

 2,077

 1,788

 1,337

 1,078

 790

 618

 351

 252

 223

 200

 174

 175

 170

 3,433

 3,425

 3,209

 3,287

 3,546

 3,628

 3,907

 3,975

 4,033

 4,144

 4,458

 3,959

 3,803

 3,972

 4,042

 5,092

 4,420

 4,267

 4,032

 3,537

 2,899

 2,412

 1,962

 1,475

 756

 399

 304

 253

 211

 251

 182

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

JANUARY 2000 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: March 27, 2000

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

PITTSBURG BOTTOM ON THE SACRAMENTO RIVER
#### § 30.300 What administrative process will OWCP use to decide claims for entitlement, and how can claimants obtain judicial review of final decisions on their claims?

OWCP district offices will issue recommended decisions with respect to most claims for entitlement under Part B and/or Part E of EEOICPA that are filed pursuant to the regulations set forth in subpart B of this part. In circumstances where a claim is made for more than one benefit available under Part B and/or Part E of the Act, OWCP may issue a recommended decision on only part of that particular claim in order to adjudicate that portion of the claim as quickly as possible. Should this occur, OWCP will issue one or more recommended decisions on the deferred portions of the claim when the adjudication of those portions is completed. All recommended decisions granting and/or denying claims for entitlement under Part B and/or Part E of the Act will be forwarded to the Final Adjudication Branch (FAB). Claimants will be given an opportunity to object to all or part of the recommended decision before the FAB. The FAB will consider objections filed by a claimant and conduct a hearing, if requested to do so by the claimant, before issuing a final decision on the claim for entitlement. Claimants may request judicial review of a final decision of FAB by filing an action in Federal district court.

[84 FR 3050, Feb. 8, 2019]
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY HIGH

 14,990

 13,656

 11,230

 10,409

 9,685

 9,047

 8,936

 10,290

 11,716

 12,114

 9,657

 9,070

 10,239

 10,208

 9,805

 9,435

 8,901

 8,302

 8,450

 7,989

 9,208

 10,031

 10,640

 10,909

 11,195

 9,993

 9,424

 10,078

 9,582

 10,419

 9,440

 3,460

 3,010

 3,043

 3,938

 4,579

 4,036

 4,114

 4,252

 3,853

 3,808

 3,417

 3,750

 3,524

 3,539

 3,025

 3,282

 3,391

 3,884

 4,055

 4,336

 4,501

 4,644

 4,313

 3,724

 4,033

 3,752

 3,371

 4,067

 4,734

 4,916

 4,653

 8,242

 7,629

 7,342

 6,948

 7,110

 6,435

 5,802

 6,360

 7,288

 6,831

 6,364

 6,287

 6,471

 6,415

 5,836

 5,927

 5,894

 5,903

 6,278

 6,272

 6,377

 6,376

 6,366

 6,727

 6,801

 6,248

 5,985

 6,590

 6,974

 7,243

 6,781

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

AUGUST 2004 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: September 8, 2004

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

PORT CHICAGO TOP IN SUISUN BAY
[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 74 (Monday, April 18, 2011)]
[Notices]
[Page 21780]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2011-9237]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

Bureau of Land Management

[LLMT-06000-01-L10200000-PG0000]


Notice of Public Meeting; Central Montana Resource Advisory 
Council

AGENCY: Bureau of Land Management, Interior.

ACTION: Notice of public meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: In accordance with the Federal Land Policy and Management Act 
and the Federal Advisory Committee Act of 1972, the U.S. Department of 
the Interior, Bureau of Land Management (BLM) Central Montana Resource 
Advisory Council (RAC) will meet as indicated below.

DATES: The meeting will be held May 3 and 4, 2011. The May 3 meeting 
will begin at 10 a.m. with a 30-minute public comment period and will 
adjourn at 5:30 p.m. The May 4 meeting will begin at 8 a.m. with a 30-
minute public comment period and will adjourn at 3 p.m.

ADDRESSES: The meetings will be in the Dick Irvin Incorporated 
Building, at 575 Wilson, in Shelby, Montana.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This 15-member council advises the Secretary 
of the Interior on a variety of management issues associated with 
public land management in Montana. During these meetings the council 
will participate in/discuss/act upon these topics/activities: Election 
of council officers for 2011; a RAC roundtable; BLM partnerships; BLM 
law enforcement responsibilities; a fee amenity presentation from a RAC 
subgroup; a review of the 2011 RAC work plan; an OHV presentation from 
a RAC subgroup; touring a nearby wind farm; district managers' updates; 
a report about BLM's wild land policy; early season sage grouse counts; 
the National Riparian Service Team assessment along the Upper Missouri 
River; a video of the 2010 fire season; and administrative details.
    All RAC meetings are open to the public. The public may present 
written comments to the RAC. Each formal RAC meeting will also have 
time allocated for hearing public comments. Depending on the number of 
persons wishing to comment and time available, the time for individual 
oral comments may be limited.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Gary L. ``Stan'' Benes, Lewistown 
District Manager, Lewistown Field Office, 920 NE Main, Lewistown, 
Montana 59457, (406) 538-1900. Persons who use a telecommunications 
device for the deaf (TDD) may call the Federal Information Relay 
Service (FIRS) at 1-800-677-8339 to contact the above individual during 
normal business hours. The FIRS is available 24 hours a day, 7 days a 
week to leave a message or question with the above individual. You will 
receive a reply during normal business hours.

Diane M. Friez,
Acting Associate State Director, Montana/Dakotas Bureau of Land 
Management.
[FR Doc. 2011-9237 Filed 4-15-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-DN-P
#### Class Journal Company v. Valveless Inner Tube Company.

Application denied, with ten dollars costs. Order signed. Present — Ingraham, P. J., McLaugMin, LaugMin, Clarke and Scott, JJ.
**EXHIBIT 99.23**

 

**CONSENT OF RONALD SIMPSON**

 

United States Securities and Exchange Commission

Gentlemen:

In connection with Silver Wheaton Corporation’s (the “Company”) Annual Report on Form 40-F for the year ended December 31, 2008 (the “Annual Report”), I, Ronald G. Simpson, P.Geo., President (GeoSim), hereby consent to the inclusion in, or incorporation by reference into, and the use of my name in connection with the preparation of the following            documents/reports:

 

| 1.     | Resource estimate of the La Negra Mine;                                                                                                         |
|--------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   |                                                                                                                                            |
| 2.     | Technical report dated March 14, 2008, entitled “Mineral Resources Estimate Monica Deposit La Negra Mine, Queretaro State, Mexico”; |
|   |                                                                                                                                            |
| 3.     | The Annual Report.                                                                                                                              |

 

Date: March 30, 2009

|   | Yours truly,/s/ Ronald G. Simpson                                                                                                                    |
|--------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   | Name: Ronald G. Simpson, P.Geo. Title:   President,            GeoSim Services Inc. |
**Exhibit 23.1**

 

Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

 

We hereby consent to the incorporation byreference in the registration statement of Bio-Reference Laboratories, Inc.on Form S-8 (File No. 333-111578) or our report dated December 17,2005 on our audit of the consolidated financial statements of Bio-ReferenceLaboratories, Inc. and its subsidiaries as of October 31, 2005 and2004 and for the three fiscal years then ended, which report is included inBio-Reference Laboratories, Inc.’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for theyear ended October 31, 2005.

 

 

MOORE STEPHENS, P.C.

Certified Public Accountants

 

Cranford, New Jersey

January 11, 2006

 

1

----
§ 1002.86 When is the employee excused from giving advance notice of service in the uniformed services? The employee is required to give advance notice of pending service unless giving such notice is prevented by military necessity, or is otherwise impossible or unreasonable under all the circumstances. ( a ) Only a designated authority can make a determination of “military necessity,” and such a determination is not subject to judicial review. Guidelines for defining “military necessity” appear in regulations issued by the Department of Defense at 32 CFR 104.3. In general, these regulations cover situations where a mission, operation, exercise or requirement is classified, or could be compromised or otherwise adversely affected by public knowledge. In certain cases, the Secretary of Homeland Security, in consultation with the Secretary of Defense, can make a determination that giving of notice by intermittent disaster-response appointees of the National Disaster Medical System is precluded by “military necessity.” See 42 U.S.C. 300hh-11(e)(3)(B).
( b ) It may be impossible or unreasonable to give advance notice under certain circumstances. Such circumstances may include the unavailability of the employee's employer or the employer's representative, or a requirement that the employee report for uniformed service in an extremely short period of time.
#### § 295.2 Definitions.

As used in this part—

*Act* means the Railroad Retirement Act.

*Court* means any court of competent jurisdiction of any state, the District of Columbia, the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico, Guam, American Samoa, the Virgin Islands, the Northern Mariana Islands, and the Trust Territory of the Pacific Islands; any court of the United States (as defined in section 451 of title 28 of the United States Code) having competent jurisdiction; any Indian court as defined by section 1301 of title 25 of the United States Code; or any court of competent jurisdiction of a foreign country with which the United States has an agreement requiring the United States to honor any court order of such country.

*Court decree* means a final decree of divorce, dissolution, annulment, or legal separation issued by a court (including a final decree or order modifying the terms of a previously issued decree of divorce, dissolution, annulment, or legal separation), which is issued in accordance with the laws of the jurisdiction of that court and which provides for the division of property.

*Division of property* means any transfer of property or its value by an individual to his or her spouse or former spouse in compliance with any community property settlement, equitable distribution of property, or other distribution of property between spouses or former spouses, which is intended as a present and complete settlement of the property rights of the parties.

*Employee* means an individual who is or was formerly an employee as defined by part 203 of this chapter.

*Final decree* means a decree from which no appeal may be taken or from which no appeal has been taken within the time allowed for taking such appeals under the laws applicable to such appeals, or a decree from which timely appeal has been taken and such appeal has been finally decided under the laws applicable to such appeals.

*Former spouse* means the former husband or wife of an employee who, on or before the date of a court order, was married to the employee and that marriage has ended by final decree of divorce, dissolution, or annulment.

*Property settlement* means an agreement between the parties to a suit for divorce, dissolution, annulment or legal separation in which they expressly agree to a division of their property rights, and which is incorporated in the final decree; is filed with the court in connection with a suit for divorce, dissolution, annulment or legal separation; or is otherwise presented to the court in a suit in accordance with the law of the jurisdiction. An agreement assigning or transferring property between spouses is not within the purview of this part unless it is subsequently approved by a court in connection with a suit for divorce, dissolution, annulment or legal separation.

*Spouse* means the husband or wife of an employee who, on or before the date of a court order, was married to the employee and that marriage has not ended by final decree of divorce, dissolution, or annulment.

[51 FR 12845, Apr. 16, 1986, as amended at 73 FR 47045, Aug. 13, 2008]
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY HIGH

 5,128

 8,146

 8,282

 10,317

 8,604

 8,473

 7,446

 5,535

 4,485

 3,628

 2,719

 4,364

 5,082

 3,786

 5,531

 8,965

 11,549

 15,669

 20,903

 16,505

 10,262

 11,993

 6,537

 3,685

 1,808

 518

 466

 573

 313

 275

 262

 408

 359

 315

 321

 340

 330

 338

 357

 396

 422

 421

 424

 507

 346

 394

 363

 346

 381

 3,315

 1,517

 653

 1,600

 612

 430

 335

 274

 288

 259

 235

 232

 230

 1,437

 2,033

 1,889

 2,455

 2,017

 1,824

 1,757

 1,446

 1,319

 1,192

 1,167

 1,446

 1,516

 1,070

 1,377

 2,135

 3,900

 6,999

 11,971

 9,084

 5,456

 6,670

 3,900

 1,591

 583

 345

 318

 305

 264

 249

 247

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

MARCH 2005 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: April 26, 2005

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

PORT CHICAGO BOTTOM IN SUISUN BAY
N OTE : This disposition is nonprecedential. 

# United States **Court of Appeals**  **for the Federal Circuit**

______________________ COHO LICENSING LLC, Plaintiff

- Appellant

v. OATH INC., Defendant

- Appellee GLAM MEDIA INC., NING INC., ROVI CORPORATION, Defendants

______________________ 2017

- 1704, 2017

- 1706, 2017

- 1707, 2017

- 1708, 2017

- 1709, 2017

- 1710

______________________ Appeals from the United States District Court for the Northern Dis trict of California in No s . 4:14

- cv - 01576

- JSW, 4:14

- cv - 01578

- JSW, 4:14

- cv - 01579

- JSW, 4:14

- cv 02127

- JSW, 4:14

- cv - 02128

- JSW, 4:14

- cv - 02130

- JSW, Judge Jeffrey S. White.

______________________ JUDGMENT

______________________ S TEFANIE T. S COTT , Scott Shah Law PLLC, Austin, TX, argued for plaintiff

- appellant. Also represented byV ICTOR G. H ARDY , M INGHUI Y ANG , Hardy Parrish Yang, LLP, Austin, TX. C HRISTOPHER K AO , Vinson & Elkins LLP, San Fra ncisco, CA, argued for defendant

- appellee. Also rep resen ted by B ROCK S TEVEN W EBER ; J EFFREY T A -H WA H AN , Austin, TX. I SAAC P HILIP R ABICOFF , Rabicoff L aw LLC, Chicago, IL, for amici curiae Paul Asija, Craig Miloscia, Daniel P. Brown, Paul Morinville, Rita Crompton, Daniel G. Papst, Jeffrey Dobkin, Adrian Pelkus, Francisco Guerra, Lu Anne Puett, Bob Hausslein, Isaac Philip Rabicoff, Jeff Hitzler, Wayne Rasanen , Brian James, Don Skaggs, Glen Kotapish, Eren Soyak, Gary Stecklein, Randy Landreneau, Matt Steig, Steve Lyon, James Stevens, Leo Mazur, Greg Wawrzynia k, Birkir Marteinsson.

______________________ T HIS C AUSE having been heard and considered, it is O RDERED and A DJUDGED :

P ER C URIAM (D YK , O’M ALLEY , and W ALLACH , Circuit Judges ). AFFIRMED . See Fed. Cir. R. 36. E NTERED BY O RDER OF THE C OURT
February 7, 2018 /s/ Peter R. Marksteiner Date Peter R. Marksteiner Clerk of Court
§ 30.719 What requirements must the provider's response and OWCP's decision meet? ( a ) The provider's response shall be in writing and shall include an answer to OWCP's invitation to resign voluntarily. If the provider does not offer to resign, he or she shall request that a determination be made upon the existing record and any additional information provided.
( b ) Should the provider fail to respond to the letter of intent within 60 days of receipt, the deciding official may deem the allegations made therein to be true and may order exclusion of the provider.
( c ) The provider may inspect or request copies of information in the record at any time prior to the deciding official's decision by making such request to OWCP within 20 days of receipt of the letter of intent.
( d ) OWCP shall have 30 days to answer the provider's response. That answer will be forwarded to the provider, who shall then have 15 days to reply. Any response from the provider may be forwarded to DOL OIG, should OWCP deem it appropriate, to obtain additional information which may be relevant to the provider's response.
( e ) The deciding official shall be the Regional Director in the region in which the provider is located unless otherwise specified by the Director for Energy Employees Occupational Illness Compensation.
( f ) The deciding official shall issue his or her decision in writing, and shall send a copy of the decision to the provider by certified mail, return receipt requested (or equivalent service from a commercial carrier). The decision shall advise the provider of his or her right to request, within 30 days of the date of the adverse decision, a formal hearing before an administrative law judge under the procedures set forth in § 30.720. The filing of a request for a hearing within the time specified shall stay the effectiveness of the decision to exclude.
[84 FR 3057, Feb. 8, 2019]
[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 76 (Wednesday, April 20, 2011)]
[Notices]
[Pages 22106-22107]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2011-9426]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention

[Docket Number NIOSH-033]


Issuance of Final Guidance Publication

AGENCY: National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH) 
of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC),

[[Page 22107]]

Department of Health and Human Services (HHS).

ACTION: Notice of issuance of final guidance publication.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health of 
the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) announces the 
availability of the following publication: NIOSH Current Intelligence 
Bulletin 63: Occupational Exposure to Titanium Dioxide.

ADDRESSES: This document may be obtained by the following methods:
    Mail: NIOSH, Robert A. Taft Laboratories, MS-C19, 4676 Columbia 
Parkway, Cincinnati, OH 45226.
    E-mail: <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#89f9fcebfafde8effdc9eaedeaa7eee6ff"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="9eeeebfcedeafff8eadefdfafdb0f9f1e8">[email protected]</span></a>.
    Web site: http://wwwn.cdc.gov/pubs/niosh.aspx.
    Facsimile: (513) 533-8285.
    Telephone: (513) 533-8471.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Faye Rice, NIOSH, Robert A. Taft 
Laboratories, MS-C32, 4676 Columbia Parkway, Cincinnati, OH 45226, 
telephone (513) 533-8335.

    Dated: April 11, 2011.
John M. Howard,
Director, National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health, 
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.
[FR Doc. 2011-9426 Filed 4-19-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4163-19-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
EXHIBIT 31.2
 CCFNB BANCORP, INC.
 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
RULE 13a  14(a) UNDER THE SECURITIES  EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934, AS AMENDED
  1.
    
    I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of CCFNB Bancorp, Inc.;2.
    
    Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a
material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in
light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with
respect to the period covered by this report;3.
    
    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information
included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition,
results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods
presented in this report;4.
    
    The registrants other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing and
maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e)
and 15d  15 (e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange
Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and have:
     5.
    
    The registrants other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most
recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants
auditors and the audit committee of the registrants board of directors (or persons
performing the equivalent functions):(a)
    
    All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of
internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect
the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information;
and(b)
    
    Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who
have a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial reporting.
  /s/ Jeffrey T. ArnoldJeffrey T. Arnold, CPA, CIAChief Financial Officer and Treasurer
(Principal Financial Officer) 38