alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

NO. 03-05-00528-CV

Ole S. Petersen, Appellant

v.

Rissie Owens, Appellee

FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF TRAVIS COUNTY, 98TH JUDICIAL DISTRICT

NO. GN400915, HONORABLE SCOTT H. JENKINS, JUDGE PRESIDING

M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N

On February 21, 2006, the clerk of this Court notified the parties that it appeared that

this Court lacks jurisdiction to consider this appeal from the district court’s order finding appellant’s

suit to be a petition for a writ of habeas corpus and transferring the case to the 23rd District Court

of Brazoria County. See Tex. Civ. Prac. & Rem. Code Ann. § 51.014(a) (West Supp. 2005); Fox

v. Wardy, No. 08-04-0361-CV, 2005 Tex. App. LEXIS 5882 (Tex. App.—El Paso July 28, 2005,

pet. denied) (appeal of transfer order dismissed for want of jurisdiction). Appellant was informed

that the appeal would be dismissed for want of jurisdiction if no response explaining why the Court
 In light of our holding that this Court lacks jurisdiction to consider the appeal, we dismiss

1

appellant’s motion to extend time to file his brief.

2

has jurisdiction was received within ten days. No response has been received. Accordingly, we

dismiss the appeal for want of jurisdiction. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.3(a).

1

 

Bea Ann Smith, Justice

Before Justices B. A. Smith, Puryear and Waldrop

Dismissed for Want of Jurisdiction

Filed: March 20, 2006
HILLS BANCORPORATION
                                   EXHIBIT 11

                    COMPUTATION OF EARNINGS PER COMMON SHARE

                                                            Three months ended
                                                                 March 31

                                                           2001            2000
                                                          ----------------------
Weighted average number of shares outstanding
  (basic) ......................................          1,495,483    1,495,941
Weighted average of potential dilutive shares
  Attributable to stock options granted
  computed under the treasury stock method .....             13,250       12,585
                                                          ----------------------
Weighted average number of shares (diluted) ....          1,508,733    1,508,526
                                                          ======================
Earnings Per Share:
   Net income (in thousands) ...................          $   2,307    $   2,204
                                                          ======================
   Earnings per common share:
     Basic .....................................          $    1.54    $    1.47
     Diluted ...................................               1.53         1.46
### §7803. Applicability to Bureau of Indian Education operated schools

For the purpose of any competitive program under this chapter—

(1) a consortium of schools operated by the Bureau of Indian Education;

(2) a school operated under a contract or grant with the Bureau of Indian Education in consortium with another contract or grant school or a tribal or community organization; or

(3) a Bureau of Indian Education school in consortium with an institution of higher education, a contract or grant school, or a tribal or community organization,

shall be given the same consideration as a local educational agency.

(Pub. L. 89–10, title VIII, §8103, formerly title IX, §9103, as added Pub. L. 107–110, title IX, §901, Jan. 8, 2002, 115 Stat. 1966; renumbered title VIII, §8103, and amended Pub. L. 114–95, title VIII, §§8001(a)(1), 8004, Dec. 10, 2015, 129 Stat. 2088, 2089, 2100.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Prior Provisions

Prior sections 7811 to 7818 were omitted in the general amendment of former subchapter IX of this chapter by Pub. L. 107–110.

Section 7811, Pub. L. 89–10, title IX, §9111, as added Pub. L. 103–382, title I, §101, Oct. 20, 1994, 108 Stat. 3774, set forth purpose of provisions relating to formula grants to local educational agencies.

Section 7812, Pub. L. 89–10, title IX, §9112, as added Pub. L. 103–382, title I, §101, Oct. 20, 1994, 108 Stat. 3774; amended Pub. L. 104–5, §1, Mar. 23, 1995, 109 Stat. 72, related to grants to local educational agencies.

Section 7813, Pub. L. 89–10, title IX, §9113, as added Pub. L. 103–382, title I, §101, Oct. 20, 1994, 108 Stat. 3775, related to amount of grants.

Section 7814, Pub. L. 89–10, title IX, §9114, as added Pub. L. 103–382, title I, §101, Oct. 20, 1994, 108 Stat. 3776, related to applications for grants.

Section 7815, Pub. L. 89–10, title IX, §9115, as added Pub. L. 103–382, title I, §101, Oct. 20, 1994, 108 Stat. 3778; amended Pub. L. 105–332, §3(c)(2), Oct. 31, 1998, 112 Stat. 3125, related to authorized services and activities.

Section 7816, Pub. L. 89–10, title IX, §9116, as added Pub. L. 103–382, title I, §101, Oct. 20, 1994, 108 Stat. 3779, related to student eligibility forms.

Section 7817, Pub. L. 89–10, title IX, §9117, as added Pub. L. 103–382, title I, §101, Oct. 20, 1994, 108 Stat. 3781, related to payments.

Section 7818, Pub. L. 89–10, title IX, §9118, as added Pub. L. 103–382, title I, §101, Oct. 20, 1994, 108 Stat. 3782, related to State educational agency review.

#### Amendments

2015—Pub. L. 114–95, §8004, substituted "Bureau of Indian Education" for "Bureau of Indian Affairs" in section catchline and wherever appearing in text.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date of 2015 Amendment

Amendment by Pub. L. 114–95 effective Dec. 10, 2015, except with respect to certain noncompetitive programs and competitive programs, see section 5 of Pub. L. 114–95, set out as a note under section 6301 of this title.
I 

114TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 382 

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located at 

8585 Criterion Drive in Colorado Springs, Colorado, as the ‘‘Chaplain 

(Capt.) Dale Goetz Memorial Post Office Building’’. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JANUARY 14, 2015 

Mr. LAMBORN introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Oversight and Government Reform 

A BILL 

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service 

located at 8585 Criterion Drive in Colorado Springs, 

Colorado, as the ‘‘Chaplain (Capt.) Dale Goetz Memorial 

Post Office Building’’. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. CHAPLAIN (CAPT.) DALE GOETZ MEMORIAL 

4 POST OFFICE BUILDING. 

5 (a) DESIGNATION.—The facility of the United States 

6 Postal Service located at 8585 Criterion Drive in Colorado 

7 Springs, Colorado, shall be known and designated as the 


tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 382 IH

1 ‘‘Chaplain (Capt.) Dale Goetz Memorial Post Office Build2 ing’’. 

3 (b) REFERENCES.—Any references in a law, map, 

4 regulation, document, paper, or other record of the United 

5 States to the facility referred to in subsection (a) shall 

6 be deemed to be a reference to the ‘‘Chaplain (Capt.) Dale 

7 Goetz Memorial Post Office Building’’. 

Æ 


tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 12.3


                                  PACCAR Inc

               COMPUTATION OF RATIO OF EARNINGS TO FIXED CHARGES
                    PURSUANT TO SEC REPORTING REQUIREMENTS
                            (Thousands of Dollars)

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>

                                                 Nine Months Ended
                                                   September 30
                                                 1998          1997
                                               --------      --------
<S>                                            <C>           <C>
FIXED CHARGES
  Interest expense
  PACCAR Inc and Subsidiaries (1)              $121,705      $108,695
  Portion of rentals deemed interest             10,915         4,579
                                               --------      --------

TOTAL FIXED CHARGES                            $132,620      $113,274
                                               --------      --------
                                               --------      --------

EARNINGS
  Income before taxes -
    PACCAR Inc and Subsidiaries                $473,135      $327,524
  Fixed charges                                 132,620       113,274
                                               --------      --------

EARNINGS AS DEFINED                            $605,755      $440,798
                                               --------      --------
                                               --------      --------

RATIO OF EARNINGS TO FIXED CHARGES                4.57x         3.89x
</TABLE>


(1) Exclusive of interest, if any, paid to PACCAR Inc.



                                     -15-
Editorial Note on Part 70
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 70 appear by T.D. ATF-450, 66 FR 29022-29030, May 29, 2001.

§ 70.303 Rules and regulations. ( a ) *Issuance.* The Administrator, with the approval of the Secretary, shall prescribe all needful rules and regulations for the enforcement of provisions of 26 U.S.C. enforced and administered by the Bureau (except where this authority is expressly given by 26 U.S.C. to any other person other than an officer or employee of the Treasury Department), including all rules and regulations as may be necessary by reason of any alteration of law in relation to taxes within the Administrator's jurisdiction.
( b ) *Retroactivity.* The Administrator, with the approval of the Secretary, may prescribe the extent, if any, to which any regulation or Treasury decision relating to the laws within the Administrator's jurisdiction shall be applied without retroactive effect. The Administrator may prescribe the extent, if any, to which any ruling relating to the laws within the Administrator's jurisdiction, issued by or pursuant to authorization from the Administrator, shall be applied without retroactive effect.
( c ) *Preparation and distribution of regulations, forms, stamps, and other matters.* The Administrator, under the direction of the Secretary, shall prepare and distribute all the instructions, regulations, directions, forms, blanks, stamps, and other matters pertaining to the assessment and collection of taxes within the Administrator's jurisdiction.
(26 U.S.C. 7805)
----

----

| 1. | Linear      Technology (U.K.) Limited |
|----|---------------------------------------|

| 2. | Linear      Technology KK (Japan) |
|----|-----------------------------------|

| 3. | Linear      Technology GmbH (Germany) |
|----|---------------------------------------|

| 4. | Linear      Technology S.A.R.L. (France) |
|----|------------------------------------------|

| 5. | Linear      Technology PTE (Singapore) |
|----|----------------------------------------|

| 6. | Linear      Technology (Taiwan) Corporation |
|----|---------------------------------------------|

| 7. | Linear      Technology Korea |
|----|------------------------------|

| 8. | Linear      Semiconductor Sdn Bhd (Malaysia) |
|----|----------------------------------------------|

| 9. | Linear      Technology A.B. (Sweden) |
|----|--------------------------------------|

| 10.   | Linear      Technology Corporation Limited (HongKong) |
|-----------------|-------------------------------------------------------|

| 11.   | Linear      Technology  S.r.l.(Italy) |
|-----------------|-------------------------------------------------|

| 12.   | Linear      Technology GK (Japan) |
|-----------------|-----------------------------------|

| 13.   | Linear      Technology Canada Corp. |
|-----------------|-------------------------------------|

----
chyl_ex109.htm

EXHIBIT 10.9
  
 Shaanxi Jinjiangshan Health Technology Development Co., 
  
 Share Transfer Agreement
  
  	 Transferor:YangMiao
	 (Party A)

	 Transferee: Shaanxi Jinjiangshan Senior Living Service Management Co., Ltd.
	 (Party B)



  
 This agreement was signed by Party A and Party B on the equity transfer of Shaanxi Jinjiangshan Health Technology Development Co., Ltd. on June 1, 2018. On the principle of equality and mutual benefit, both parties have reached the following agreement through friendly negotiation:
  
 1. Party A agrees to transfer 30% of equity under Shaanxi Jinjiangshan Health Technology Development Co., Ltd. Which equals to 3 million Yuan to Party B at the price of 0 Yuan, and Party B agrees to purchase the above equity at this price.
  
 2. Party B agrees to pay Party A's equity transfer amount of ______ million to Party A within ____ days after the conclusion of this agreement.
  
 3. Party A guarantees that the equity of the company transferred to Party B is legally owned by Party A and has full disciplinary power. The equity has not been registered for pledge, has not been frozen by the judicial authorities, and there is no equity dispute. Otherwise, all the resulting Legal responsibility shall be taken by Party A.
  
 4. After the equity transfer, Party A's rights and obligations to shareholders in Shaanxi Jinjiangshan Health Technology Development Co., Ltd. will be transferred to Party B.
  
 5. This Agreement shall become effective after the signature and seal of both parties.
  
  	 Party A's signature or official seal:
	  
	  

	    
	  
	  

	 PartyB's signature or official seal:
EXHIBIT 12
                     AMERITECH CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
                COMPUTATION OF RATIO OF EARNINGS TO FIXED CHARGES
                                   (Unaudited)
                                        
                              (Dollars in Millions)
                                        
                                                 Nine Months Ended
                                                    September 30
                                                   --------------
                                                 1998         1997
                                                 ----         ----
EARNINGS
--------
Income before interest, income taxes
 and undistributed equity earnings (1)......   $4,808   $    3,070
Portion of rent expense
 representing interest......................       57            55
Michigan Single Business tax................       31            44
Preferred dividends of subsidiaries (2).....       38            14
                                               ------        ------
Total earnings (3)..........................   $4,934        $3,183
                                               ------        ------
FIXED CHARGES
-------------
Interest expense............................   $  462        $  371
Capitalized interest........................       20            19
Portion of rent expense
 representing interest......................       57            55
Preferred dividends of subsidiaries (2).....       38            14
                                               ------        ------
Total fixed charges.........................   $  577        $  459
                                               ------        ------
Ratio of earnings to fixed charges..........     8.55          6.93
                                               ======        ======


(1)  Income before interest, income taxes and undistributed equity
     earnings for the nine months ended September 30, 1998 includes a
     one-time pretax gain of $1,543 million ($1,012 million after-tax)
     from the sale of substantially all of our shares in Telecom
     Corporation of New Zealand Limited (TCNZ).
     
(2)  As required by SEC rules, we have grossed up the preferred stock
     dividends to an amount representing the pretax earnings needed to
     cover the dividend requirements.
     
(3)  Earnings represent income before income taxes and fixed charges.
     Since we have already deducted the Michigan Single Business Tax
     (the Tax) and rental expense to arrive at income before interest
     and income taxes, the Tax and the one-third portion of rental
     expense considered to be fixed charges are added back to arrive at
     total earnings.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

DAY HIGH

 233

 246

 250

 242

 235

 233

 232

 232

 227

 237

 248

 252

 244

 253

 264

 260

 262

 265

 267

 267

 283

 286

 288

 280

 293

 298

 306

 298

 222

 219

 223

 223

 224

 223

 223

 215

 219

 225

 231

 231

 235

 237

 242

 243

 245

 248

 246

 251

 254

 255

 257

 262

 266

 270

 266

 276

 227

 230

 234

 230

 229

 227

 228

 222

 223

 230

 237

 240

 239

 243

 248

 251

 253

 257

 256

 259

 267

 271

 274

 272

 279

 284

 284

 285

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

FEBRUARY 2011 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: March 30, 2011

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

HOLLAND TRACT ON OLD RIVER
I 

114TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 3898 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to extend for two years 

the credit for qualified small wind energy property. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

NOVEMBER 3, 2015 

Mr. GRAYSON introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Ways and Means 

A BILL 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to extend 

for two years the credit for qualified small wind energy 

property. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. EXTENSION OF CREDIT FOR QUALIFIED SMALL 

4 WIND ENERGY PROPERTY. 

5 (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 48(c)(4)(C) of the Inter6 nal Revenue Code of 1986 is amended by striking ‘‘De7 cember 31, 2016’’ and inserting ‘‘December 31, 2018’’. 

8 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendments made by 

9 this section shall apply to periods after December 31, 

10 2016, in taxable years ending after such date, under rules 


smartinez on DSK4TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 3898 IH

1 similar to the rules of section 48(m) of the Internal Rev2 enue Code of 1986 (as in effect on the day before the date 

3 of the enactment of Revenue Reconciliation Act of 1990). 

Æ 


smartinez on DSK4TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
T hi s di s pos i t i on i s notappr opr i a t e f orpubl i c a t i on and i s notpr e c e de nt * e xc e pta s pr ovi de d by9th C i r . R . 36- 3.

T he pane lunani m ous l yc onc l ude s thi s c a s e i s s ui t abl e f orde c i s i on ** w ith o u t o r a l ar g u m e n t. See F ed. R . A pp . P . 34 (a )( 2). NOT F OR P UB L I CAT I ON UN I TE D STATE S C OU RT OF APPE ALS FOR T HE NI NTH CI RC UI T A RM A N D O RI V A S- PU EN TES, P et i t i on er , v. E R I C H . H O L D E R , J r ., A tto rn e yG e n e r a l, R e s p o n d e n t. N o. 12- 71977 A ge nc yN o. A 200- 153- 867 ME MOR AN DU M *

O n P e t i t i on f

orR e vi e w of

an O r de rof

the B o ar do f I m m ig r a tio n A p p e a ls S ubm i tt e d M ay14, 2013 ** B efo re: L E A V Y , T H O M A S , an dM U R G U IA , C i rcu i tJu d g es. A rm ando R i va s - P ue nt e s , ana t i ve and c i t i z e n of M e xi c o, pe t i t i ons pr o s e f or re vi ew of the B oard of Im m i grat i on A pp ea l s’ order di sm i ss i ng hi s app ea lfr om an i m m i g rat i o n j u d g e’ s (“ IJ”) rem o v al o rd er. O u r j u ri sd i ct i o n i s g o v ern edb y 8 U .S .C . § 1 2 5 2 . W e r e v ie w d e n o v o qu e s tio n s o f law , Kha n v. H

older , 584 F . 3d 

# FI LED MA Y20 2 013 M OLLY C. DW Y ER, CLERK U . S. C O U R T OF APPE ALS12- 71977 2 7 7 3 , 7 7 6 (9 th C i r. 2 0 0 9 ), an drev i ew fo r ab u se o f d i scret i o n th e d en i al o f a req u est f o rac o n tin u an c e , A hm ed v. H older , 5 6 9 F .3 d1 0 0 9 , 1 0 1 2 ( 9 th C ir . 2 0 0 9 ) . W e d e n yth e p e t i t i o n f

o rr e v i e w. R iv a s - P u e n te s ’ c o n v ic tio n f o rin f lic tin g c o rp o r a l in

ju ryo n h is s p o u s e , in vi ol at i on of C al i forni a P enalC od e § 27 3. 5(a) , i s acr i m e of dom es t i c vi ol ence unde r8 U . S . C . § 1227( a ) ( 2) ( E ) ( i ) tha tr e nde r s hi m s t a tut or i l yi ne l i gi bl e f or c an c e lla tio n o f

r e m o v a l. See 8 U .S .C . § 1 2 2 9 b ( b ) ( 1 ) ( C ) ; V asqu ez -H

erna ndezv. H older , 5 9 0 F .3 d1 0 5 3 , 1 0 5 6 - 5 7 ( 9 th C ir . 2 0 1 0 ) ; B an uelos-Ayon v. H older , 611 F . 3d10 80 , 10 83 -86 (9th C i r. 20 10 ). T he IJdi d n otabuse hi s di sc re t i on i n d enyi ng R i vas- P uent es ’ re qu es tfor a c o n tin u an c e f

o rf a ilu r e to s h o w g o o dc au s e . See 8 C .F .R . § 1 0 0 3 .2 9 ; Sa n do v a lL un a v. Mukasey , 526 F . 3d 1243, 1247 ( 9th C i r . 2008) ( pe rc ur i am ) ( no abus e of d is c r e tio n in d e n y in g c o n tin u an c e w h e r e r e lie f w a s n o t im m e d ia te lyav a ilab le ) . P E T I T I ON F OR RE V I E W DE NI E D.
### §§9010, 9011. Transferred

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section 9010, Pub. L. 103–382, title IV, §411, Oct. 20, 1994, 108 Stat. 4036; Pub. L. 107–110, title VI, §602(a), Jan. 8, 2002, 115 Stat. 1898; Pub. L. 107–279, title IV, §401(d)(1)–(7), Nov. 5, 2002, 116 Stat. 1984, was renumbered Pub. L. 107–279, title III, §303, by Pub. L. 107–279, title IV, §401(d)(8), Nov. 5, 2002, 116 Stat. 1984, and transferred to section 9622 of this title.

Section 9011, Pub. L. 103–382, title IV, §412, Oct. 20, 1994, 108 Stat. 4039; Pub. L. 106–554, §1(a)(1) [title III, §307], Dec. 21, 2000, 114 Stat. 2763, 2763A–44; Pub. L. 107–110, title VI, §602(b), Jan. 8, 2002, 115 Stat. 1904; Pub. L. 107–279, title IV, §401(c)(1)–(5), Nov. 5, 2002, 116 Stat. 1983, was renumbered Pub. L. 107–279, title III, §302, by Pub. L. 107–279, title IV, §401(c)(6), Nov. 5, 2002, 116 Stat. 1984, and transferred to section 9621 of this title.
§ 10.741 How are benefits calculated in LEO claims? ( a ) Except for continuation of pay, eligible officers and survivors are entitled to the same benefits as if the officer had been an employee under 5 U.S.C. 8101. However, such benefits may be reduced or adjusted as OWCP in its discretion may deem appropriate to reflect comparable benefits which the officer or survivor received or would have been entitled to receive by virtue of the officer's employment.
( b ) For the purpose of this section, a comparable benefit includes any benefit that the officer or survivor is entitled to receive because of the officer's employment, including pension and disability funds, State workers' compensation payments, Public Safety Officers' Benefits Act payments, and State and local lump-sum payments. Health benefits coverage and proceeds of life insurance policies purchased by the employer are not considered to be comparable benefits.
( c ) The FECA provides that, where an officer receives comparable benefits, compensation benefits are to be reduced proportionally in a manner that reflects the relative percentage contribution of the officer and the officer's employer to the fund which is the source of the comparable benefit. Where the source of the comparable benefit is a retirement or other system which is not fully funded, the calculation of the amount of the reduction will be based on a per capita comparison between the contribution by the employer and the contribution by all covered officers during the year prior to the officer's injury or death.
( d ) The non-receipt of compensation during a period where a dual benefit (such as a lump-sum payment on the death of an officer) is being offset against compensation entitlement does not result in an adjustment of the respective benefit percentages of remaining beneficiaries because of a cessation of compensation under 5 U.S.C. 8133(c).
(No. 74-CC-535

#### Alexanders Movers, Claimant, *vs.*State of Illinois, Department of Public Aid, Respondent.

*Opinion filed June 13, 1974.*

Alexanders Movers, Claimant, pro se.

William J. Scott, Attorney General; Saul R. Wexler, Assistant Attorney General, for Respondent.

*457Per Curiam.