alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 9.104 South Coast. ( a ) *Name.* The name of the viticultural area described in this section is “South Coast.”
( b ) *Approved maps.* The appropriate maps for determining the boundaries of South Coast viticultural area are four U.S.G.S. maps. They are titled: ( 1 ) San Diego, 1:250,000 series, 1958 (revised 1978).
( 2 ) Santa Ana, 1:250,000 series, 1959 (revised 1979).
( 3 ) Long Beach, 1:250,000 series, 1957 (revised 1978).
( 4 ) Wildomar Quadrangle, 7.5 minute series, 1953 (photorevised 1973).
( c ) *Boundary* — ( 1 ) *General.* The South Coast viticultural area is located in California. The starting point of the following boundary description is the northern intersection of the Orange County line with the Pacific Ocean (on the Long Beach map).
( 2 ) *Boundary Description.* ( i ) From the starting point generally northeastward, eastward, and southeastward along the Orange County line, to the intersection of that county line with the township line on the northern border of Township 7 South (in Range 6 West; on the Santa Ana map).
( ii ) From there eastward along that township line to its intersection with the northern boundary of the Temecula viticultural area described in § 9.50; at this point, the Temecula viticultural area boundary coincides with the boundary of the Cleveland National Forest (on the Wildomar Quadrangle map).
( iii ) From there following the northern boundary of the Temecula viticultural area, at and near its northernmost point, generally northeastward, eastward, and southeastward until the Temecula viticultural area boundary again intersects the township line on the northern border of Township 7 South (in Range 4 West; thus all of the Temecula viticultural area is included inside of South Coast viticultural area).
( iv ) Then eastward, along the township line on the northern border of Township 7 South, to the San Bernardino Meridian (on the Santa Ana map).
( v ) Then southward along the San Bernardino Meridian to the Riverside County-San Diego County line.
( vi ) Then westward along that county line for about 71 ⁄ 2 miles, to the western boundary of the Cleveland National Forest (near the Pechanga Indian Reservation).
( vii ) Then generally southeastward along the Cleveland National Forest boundary to where it joins California Highway 76.
( viii ) From there generally southeastward along Highway 76 to California Highway 79.
( ix ) Then southeastward along Highway 79 to the township line on the northern border of Township 12 South (in Range 3 East).
( x ) Then eastward along that township line to its intersection with the range line on the eastern border of Range 3 East.
( xi ) From there southward along that range line to the U.S.-Mexico international border.
( xii ) Then westward along that international border to the Pacific Ocean.
( xiii ) Then generally northwestward along the shore of the Pacific Ocean to the starting point.
[T.D. ATF-218, 50 FR 48084, Nov. 21, 1985]
§ 30.316 How does the FAB issue a final decision on a claim? ( a ) If the claimant does not file a written statement that objects to the recommended decision and/or requests a hearing within the period of time allotted in § 30.310, or if the claimant waives any objections to all or part of the recommended decision, the FAB may issue a final decision accepting the recommendation of the district office, either in whole or in part (see §§ 30.311, 30.312 and 30.314(b)).
( b ) If the claimant objects to all or part of the recommended decision, the FAB reviewer will issue a final decision on the claim after either the hearing or the review of the written record, and after completing such further development of the case as he or she may deem necessary.
( c ) Any recommended decision (or part thereof) that is pending either a hearing or a review of the written record for more than one year from the date the FAB received the written statement described in § 30.310(a), or the date the Director reopened the claim for issuance of a new final decision pursuant to § 30.320(a), shall be considered a final decision of the FAB on the one-year anniversary of such date. Any recommended decision described in § 30.311 that is pending at the FAB for more than one year from the date that the period of time described in § 30.310 expired shall be considered a final decision of the FAB on the one-year anniversary of such date.
( d ) The decision of the FAB, whether issued pursuant to paragraph (a), (b) or (c) of this section, shall be final upon the date of issuance of such decision, unless a timely request for reconsideration under § 30.319 has been filed.
( e ) A copy of the final decision of the FAB will be mailed to the claimant's last known address and to the claimant's designated representative before OWCP, if any. Notification to either the claimant or the representative will be considered notification to both parties.
A-AA+Skip to content

                  - Home
                  - Compendium Statistics
                  - Event
                  - Archives
                  - Glossary
                  - Help
                  - Contact
                  - Research on Disability

Annual Disability Statistics Compendium

              - Home /
              - Archives /
              - 2012 Compendium Statistics /
              - 2012 Special Education /
              - 2012 11.8 Special Education—Change in Graduation Rate among Students Ages 14-21 Served under IDEA, Part B

## Table 11.8: Special Education—Change in Graduation Rate[1] among Students Ages 14 to 21 Served under IDEA, Part B: Fall 2009 School Year to Fall 2010 School Year

----

----

 

----

#### 2012 Disability Compendium

                        - Home
                        - Compendium Statistics                           - Population and Prevelance
                          - Employment
                          - Time Trend Population Statistics
                          - Poverty
                          - Earnings
                          - Veterans
                          - Health Insurance Coverage
                          - Health
                          - Social Security Administration Programs
                          - Medicaid and Medicare
                          - Special Education
                          - Vocational Rehabilitation
                          - Federal Government Spending and Employment
                          - International Disability Statistics
                          - Population Statistics: Disability Type
                        - Event
                        - Archives                           - 2012 Compendium Statistics
                        - Glossary
                        - Help
                        - Contact
                        - Research on Disability

#### Funding for this project is made possible by:

 The Research and Training Center on Disability Statistics and Demographics (StatsRRTC), which is funded by the U.S. Department of Education, National Institute for Disability and Rehabilitation Research, under cooperative agreements H133B080012.

#### Stay Connected

**Institute on Disability**10 West Edge Drive, Suite 101Durham, NH 03824603.862.4320 | relay: 711 | [email protected]www.iod.unh.edu

© 2013. Institute on Disability.University of New Hampshire.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY HIGH

 376

 385

 729

 5,569

 5,591

 4,013

 1,423

 584

 399

 318

 265

 259

 267

 278

 258

 254

 255

 294

 379

 2,579

 3,827

 3,575

 2,774

 3,080

 2,653

 2,470

 2,362

 2,721

 3,180

 3,474

 4,132

 313

 289

 277

 274

 325

 359

 327

 300

 275

 239

 232

 230

 226

 227

 222

 226

 242

 246

 254

 263

 296

 390

 441

 499

 506

 472

 488

 531

 541

 547

 565

 346

 324

 327

 1,154

 1,688

 991

 584

 364

 313

 265

 243

 236

 237

 238

 238

 242

 246

 259

 267

 598

 1,033

 1,264

 1,089

 1,132

 1,099

 948

 972

 979

 1,207

 1,144

 1,372

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

MARCH 2001 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: April 9, 2001

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

PITTSBURG BOTTOM ON THE SACRAMENTO RIVER
EXHIBIT 12
                              BellSouth Corporation
                    Computation Of Earnings To Fixed Charges
                              (Dollars In Millions)


For the Three Months Ended March 31, 2004

Earnings

Income from continuing operations before provision for income
  taxes, minority interest, discontinued operations, and
  cumulative effect of accounting change                              $1,773

Equity in (earnings) losses of unconsolidated affiliates                (104)

Portion of rental expense representative of interest factor               28

Distributed income of equity affiliates                                   --

Interest expense                                                         215

                                                                  -----------
                                                                  -----------
   Income, as adjusted                                                $1,912
                                                                  -----------
                                                                  -----------

Fixed Charges


Interest expense                                                       $ 215

Interest capitalized                                                       1

Portion of rental expense representative of interest factor               28

                                                                  -----------
                                                                  -----------
   Fixed Charges                                                       $ 244
                                                                  -----------
                                                                  -----------

                                                                  -----------
                                                                  -----------
Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges                                      7.83
                                                                  ===========
vktx-ex101_80.htm



 

Exhibit 10.1

EXTENSION OF TERM AND AMENDMENT OF SUBLEASE

 

This Extension of Term and Amendment of Sublease (the “Agreement”), dated as of the 30th day of September, 2018, between Fish & Richardson P.C., a Massachusetts corporation, with its principal office at One Marina Park Drive, Boston, Massachusetts 02210 (“Sublandlord”) and Viking Therapeutics, Inc., a Delaware corporation, having an office at 12340 El Camino Real, San Diego, California 92130 (“Subtenant”).

Whereas, Sublandlord and Subtenant have entered into a Sublease dated July 7, 2015, (the “Sublease”), pursuant to which Sublandlord subleased to Subtenant Suite 250 on the second floor of the Building (the “Premises”).  The Premises are shown on Exhibit A attached to the Sublease; and

Whereas, Sublandlord and Subtenant desire to further extend the term of, and otherwise amend, the Sublease; 

Now, therefore, Sublandlord and Subtenant, in consideration of the mutual covenants herein contained and each with the intent to be legally bound, hereby agree as follows:

1.Capitalized terms in this Agreement not defined herein shall have the respective meanings given such terms in the Sublease.  

2.The term of the Sublease (scheduled to expire on September 30, 2018) is hereby extended so as to expire as of the close of business on October 31, 2018, unless sooner terminated pursuant to the terms hereof or the Sublease, applicable law or as a result of the termination of the Prime Lease.

3.During the term as extended hereby Subtenant shall pay Sublandlord Monthly Rent of $21,567.38 payable in accordance with the terms of the Sublease.

4.Sublandlord and Subtenant each represent that each has not dealt with a broker or finder in connection with this Agreement.  Each party indemnifies and holds harmless the other and their respective officers, partners, members, directors, shareholders, employees, agents, representatives, attorneys, successors and assigns, against any and all claims of any broker claiming to have dealt with such party with respect to this Agreement, which obligations shall survive the termination of the Sublease.

5.This Agreement shall be subject to the consent of Prime Landlord.  Sublandlord shall not be responsible for the failure of Prime Landlord to consent hereto.    

6.Except as expressly set forth in this Agreement, all other terms, conditions and provisions of the Sublease shall remain in full force and effect.  As amended hereby, the Sublease is hereby ratified and confirmed and shall remain in full force and effect throughout the term of the Sublease as extended and amended herein.

 

[Signature Page Follows]




 



 

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have executed this Agreement as of the day and year first above written.

SUBLANDLORD:

FISH & RICHARDSON P.C., a Massachusetts professional corporation

By:  /s/ Peter J. Devlin

 Name: Peter J. Devlin
 Title:   President

 

SUBTENANT:

VIKING THERAPEUTICS, INC., a Delaware corporation

By: /s/ Brian Lian

 Name: Brian Lian

 Title:  CEO

 

- 2 -
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-2000
<CASH>                                          10,872
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   18,666
<ALLOWANCES>                                       366
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                34,543
<PP&E>                                         129,489
<DEPRECIATION>                                  77,699
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 127,635
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           24,713
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         3,330
<OTHER-SE>                                      11,813
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   127,635
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                44,395
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   41,440
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 7,586
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 815
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  4,647
<INCOME-TAX>                                     1,589
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     2,404
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (0.39)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.39)


</TABLE>
Exhibit 99.1
 For Immediate Release
 OMAR ASALI TO BECOME PRESIDENT OF HARBINGER GROUP INC.
     About Harbinger Group Inc.
  Contact information
 jzelkowitz@apcoworldwide.com
  investorrelations@Harbingergroupinc.com
### §5607. Expenditures and audit of Trust Fund

#### (a) In general

The Foundation shall pay from the interest and earnings of the Trust Fund such sums as the Board determines are necessary and appropriate to enable the Foundation to carry out the provisions of this chapter, including a reasonable amount for official reception and representation expenses, as determined by the Board, not to exceed $5,000 for a fiscal year.

#### (b) Audit by Government Accountability Office

The activities of the Foundation and the Center under this chapter may be audited by the Government Accountability Office under such rules and regulations as may be prescribed by the Comptroller General of the United States. Representatives of the Government Accountability Office shall have access to all books, accounts, records, reports filed and all other papers, things, or property belonging to or in use by the Foundation and the Center, pertaining to such federally assisted activities and necessary to facilitate the audit.

(Pub. L. 102–259, §9, Mar. 19, 1992, 106 Stat. 83; Pub. L. 105–156, §9(b), Feb. 11, 1998, 112 Stat. 12; Pub. L. 108–271, §8(b), July 7, 2004, 118 Stat. 814; Pub. L. 111–90, §8, Nov. 3, 2009, 123 Stat. 2978.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

2009—Subsec. (a). Pub. L. 111–90 inserted before period at end ", including a reasonable amount for official reception and representation expenses, as determined by the Board, not to exceed $5,000 for a fiscal year".

2004—Subsec. (b). Pub. L. 108–271 substituted "Government Accountability Office" for "General Accounting Office" in heading and in two places in text.

1998—Subsec. (a). Pub. L. 105–156 substituted "Trust Fund" for "Fund".
Exhibit 32.2

Certification by the Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to
18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, I, the undersigned Chief Financial Officer of Genzyme Corporation (the "Company"), hereby certify that the Quarterly
Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the quarter ended March 31, 2008 (the "Report") fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

|/s/MICHAEL S. WYZGAMichael S. Wyzga Chief Financial
OfficerMay 9, 2008 |  | 
|---------------------------------------------------------------------- |  | 

---



QuickLinks
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 05-1465

RONALD E. JARMUTH; ANGELA J. JARMUTH, Plaintiffs - Appellants,
versus JAMES J. CULPEPPER, Individually and in his Capacity as Family Law Master and Judge for the Family Law Court of Manongalia, West Virginia; BRIAN KROLCZYK, Individually and in his Capacity as Acting Director of Clinical Services for Valley Community Mental Health; VALLEY COMPREHENSIVE COMMUNITY MENTAL HEALTH CENTER, INCORPORATED, d/b/a Valley Health Care System; ELLIOTT MAYNARD, In his Capacity as Chief Judge of the West Virginia Supreme Court of Appeals, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of West Virginia, at Clarksburg. Irene M. Keeley, Chief District Judge. (CA-04-81-IMK) Submitted: October 3, 2005 Decided: November 4, 2005 Before NIEMEYER, TRAXLER, and KING, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Ronald E. Jarmuth, Angela J. Jarmuth, Appellants Pro Se. Stephanie Ann Jones, Jeffery Dale Taylor, ROSE PADDEN & PETTY, L.C., Fairmont, West Virginia; Vanessa Lynn Goddard, STEPTOE & JOHNSON,- 2 - Clarksburg, West Virginia; Jacquelyn J. Core, STEPTOE & JOHNSON, Morgantown, West Virginia, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).- 3 - PER CURIAM: Ronald E. Jarmuth and Angela J. Jarmuth appeal the district court’s orders dismissing their civil rights claims. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Jarmuth v. Culpepper , No. CA-04-81-IMK (N.D. W. Va. Mar. 31, 2005). We deny the Jarmuths’ motion opposing the appearance of Appellees’ counsel as the Jarmuths failed to establish that West Virginia requires the West Virginia Attorney General to represent judicial officers. SeeState ex rel. McGraw v. Burton , 569 S.E.2d 99, 105 n.5 (W. Va. 2002) (stating that its holding that state officials should be represented by the Attorney General only applied to executive branch officials and not legislative or judicial officials). We also deny the Jarmuths’ motion to strike the Appellees’ response brief. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

DAY HIGH

 20,873

 20,957

 21,460

 22,356

 24,185

 24,557

 26,687

 24,565

 24,654

 24,900

 25,236

 24,809

 23,518

 22,357

 21,854

 22,996

 24,579

 24,877

 27,327

 28,551

 28,984

 28,717

 28,662

 28,214

 26,801

 24,117

 23,776

 24,613

 26,307

 26,592

 13,573

 13,684

 13,714

 14,288

 14,152

 14,082

 15,589

 13,413

 13,830

 14,008

 13,415

 13,301

 13,559

 12,648

 13,682

 14,068

 15,807

 15,662

 16,242

 16,137

 16,522

 15,974

 16,434

 16,551

 16,270

 15,319

 15,025

 16,407

 17,374

 9,995

 17,091

 16,962

 17,522

 18,170

 18,994

 19,116

 20,665

 18,779

 18,902

 19,336

 19,278

 19,138

 19,061

 18,128

 17,855

 18,674

 19,878

 20,530

 21,347

 22,096

 22,611

 22,059

 22,466

 22,515

 21,841

 20,354

 20,215

 20,599

 21,537

 21,236

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

APRIL 2015 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: May 1, 2015

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

PORT CHICAGO BOTTOM IN SUISUN BAY
Exhibit 99.4
 (METAL STORM LOGO)
    
    METAL STORM LIMITEDACN 064 270 006Notice under Section 708A (5)(e) 
of the Corporations Act
 Brisbane, Australia
 Company
 Corporations Act 2001 Act
  1.
    
    The Company issued the Shares without disclosure to the investor under Part 6D.2 of the
Act;2.
    
    As at the date of this notice the Company has complied with:
 a.
    
    The provisions of Chapter 2M of the Act (as applicable to the Company);
andb.
    
    Section 674 of the Act; and
 3.
    
    As at the date of this notice there is no excluded information (as defined in section
708A (7) of the Act) which is required to be disclosed by the Company.
 For and on behalf of the Board of Directors ofMETAL STORM LIMITED/s/ B FarmerBrett I FarmerCompany Secretary Page 1 of 2




---



##### 



Notes:
 
 Company Contact:
 Australia & USA
  About Metal Storm
    Safe Harbour
  Page 2 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

DAY HIGH

 859

 838

 889

 847

 885

 743

 812

 854

 762

 794

 785

 721

 647

 721

 823

 915

 927

 922

 907

 900

 922

 825

 765

 750

 768

 772

 727

 653

 619

 603

 417

 432

 419

 480

 478

 509

 549

 546

 555

 567

 562

 520

 510

 505

 516

 559

 569

 579

 569

 606

 608

 566

 568

 586

 569

 540

 533

 515

 508

 487

 605

 506

 604

 561

 661

 588

 652

 642

 645

 664

 646

 573

 556

 581

 646

 706

 743

 746

 717

 733

 746

 663

 649

 660

 649

 634

 620

 595

 582

 539

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

APRIL 2016 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: May 11, 2016

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

DELTA MENDOTA CANAL AT CHECK 13 (O'NEILL)
Exhibit 23.1
 Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
 Westmoreland Coal Company Westmoreland Coal Company
(No. 74-CC-451

#### Commonwealth Edison Company, Claimant, *vs.*State of Illinois, Department of Transportation, Respondent.

*Opinion filed April 25, 1974.*

George O. Shaffner and Joseph C. Sibley, Jr., Attorneys for Claimant.

William J. Scott, Attorney General; Saul R. Wexler, Assistant Attorney General, for Respondent.

Per Curiam.