alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
114TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 3791 

AN ACT 

To raise the consolidated assets threshold under the small 

bank holding company policy statement, and for other 

purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 
2 

•HR 3791 EH

1 SECTION 1. CHANGES REQUIRED TO SMALL BANK HOLD2 ING COMPANY POLICY STATEMENT ON AS3 SESSMENT OF FINANCIAL AND MANAGERIAL 

4 FACTORS. 

5 (a) IN GENERAL.—Before the end of the 6-month pe6 riod beginning on the date of the enactment of this Act, 

7 the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System 

8 shall revise the Small Bank Holding Company Policy 

9 Statement on Assessment of Financial and Managerial 

10 Factors (12 CFR part 225—appendix C) to raise the con11 solidated asset threshold under such policy statement from 

12 $1,000,000,000 (as adjusted by Public Law 113–250) to 

13 $5,000,000,000. 

14 (b) CONFORMING AMENDMENT.—Subparagraph (C) 

15 of section 171(b)(5) of the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Re16 form and Consumer Protection Act (12 U.S.C. 

17 5371(b)(5)) is amended to read as follows: 

18 ‘‘(C) any bank holding company or savings 

19 and loan holding company that is subject to the 

20 application of the Small Bank Holding Com21 pany Policy Statement on Assessment of Finan-
3 

•HR 3791 EH

1 cial and Managerial Factors of the Board of 

2 Governors (12 CFR part 225—appendix C).’’. 

Passed the House of Representatives April 14, 2016. 

Attest: 

Clerk. 
114TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 3791 

AN ACT 

To raise the consolidated assets threshold under the 

and for other purposes. small bank holding company policy statement,
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

DAY ELEV

 221.73

 221.89

 220.80

 219.94

 222.01

 222.80

 221.81

 220.57

 220.92

 220.00

 222.45

 221.94

 223.58

 222.60

 222.68

 222.80

 220.50

 221.24

 221.84

 221.05

 220.89

 220.00

 220.15

 221.88

 222.10

 221.39

 221.12

 221.28

 221.78

 220.56

 47,677

 48,098

 45,237

 42,997

 48,411

 50,513

 47,887

 44,635

 45,551

 43,152

 49,580

 48,229

 52,598

 49,980

 50,193

 50,513

 44,453

 46,390

 47,966

 45,892

 45,472

 43,152

 43,541

 48,071

 48,650

 46,784

 46,075

 46,495

 47,809

 44,609

STORAGE

-2,569

+421

-2,861

-2,240

+5,414

+2,102

-2,626

-3,252

+916

-2,399

+6,428

-1,351

+4,369

-2,618

+213

+320

-6,060

+1,937

+1,576

-2,074

-420

-2,320

+389

+4,530

+579

-1,866

-709

+420

+1,314

-3,200

CHANGE

2,084

2,144

2,328

2,506

2,372

2,155

1,997

1,886

1,932

1,993

1,855

1,788

1,600

1,541

1,486

1,467

1,657

1,655

1,525

1,374

1,205

1,324

1,426

1,405

1,225

1,041

978

1,206

1,278

1,127

PUMPING

 5,828

 6,331

 4,815

 4,433

 4,894

 5,202

 4,888

 4,666

 5,524

 3,797

 3,755

 3,293

 3,439

 5,081

 3,896

 4,863

 5,561

 3,961

 4,893

 4,427

 4,401

 4,617

 4,436

 5,213

 4,264

 4,406

 4,117

 4,660

 4,648

 3,657

PUMPING

 3,591

 2,216

 5,690

 5,588

 2,359

 2,344

 4,455

 4,989

 3,458

 5,931

 3,285

 5,658

 4,806

 5,326

 4,614

 4,765

 5,989

 3,608

 3,256

 6,462

 4,683

 3,772

 1,260

 1,440

 4,306

 3,923

 4,193

 2,564

 2,940

 5,161

PUMPING

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

GEN.

*

+167

+49

+97

+107

+225

-33

-191

-274

+524

+51

+1,989

-1,756

+1,357

+430

+203

+359

+167

+137

+116

-33

+320

+225

+368

+43

+587

+243

+319

+439

+287

+232

OR

UNITED STATES 

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION

CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT

CONSOLIDATED STATE-FEDERAL O'NEILL FOREBAY October 2, 2000

DAILY OPERATIONS

SEPTEMBER 2000 RUN DATE:

IN LAKE GEN.

ACRE-FEET O'NEILL

RELEASE - C.F.S. 

TOTALS -5,637 49,560 0 122,632 137,966 +6,754

ACRE-FEET -5,637 98,302 0 243,241 273,656

SUMMARY

 0

RELEASE (ACRE-FEET)

O'NEILL GEN. 0

SAN LUIS PUMP 243,241 0

 50,246

DOS AMIGOS PUMP 273,656

DELIVERIES 

S. LUIS O'NEILL

 0

 333

 0

 0

 2,645

 0

 0

 0

 669

 0

 0

 1,897

 1,068

 404

 212

 1,747

 0

 0

 1,476

 2,169

 798

 827

 812

 2,144

 416

 693

 510

 293

 403

 0

 19,516

 38,710

CALIF. DOS AMIGOS

AQUEDUCT

5,872

6,233

6,637

6,278

4,740

6,484

6,213

6,403

6,319

6,475

6,437

6,341

6,422

6,712

6,716

6,216

6,671

6,754

5,826

6,333

6,551

4,842

3,287

5,345

6,634

5,413

6,146

5,498

6,283

5,845

 181,926

 360,850

S. LUIS

DELIV.

GAINS(+)

LOSS(-)

C.F.S.

INFLOW - C.F.S

STATE OF CALIFORNIA

THE RESOURCES AGENCY

DEPARTMENT OF WATER RESOURCES

STATE WATER PROJECT

TOTAL 516,897

 13,397

* DAILY DEL. FIGURES UNAVAILABLE. TOT. DEL. IS INCLUDED IN COMPUTING MONTHLY TOTALS 

Table 18
From: Donald Evans

Sent: 8/30/2005 9:47:16 AM

To: Melanie King/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA; Donald Evans; 

Melanie King/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA; Donald Evans; Melanie 

King/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA; 'Melanie King'; Donald Evans; Melanie 

King/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA

Subject: RE: Offshore Operators Committee Comment Letter 

- Docket ID EPA-HQ-OAR-2008-0708
§ 9.45 Suisun Valley. ( a ) *Name.* The name of the viticultural area described in this section is “Suisun Valley.”
( b ) *Approved maps.* The appropriate maps for determining the boundaries of the Suisun Valley viticultural area are four U.S.G.S. maps. They are titled: ( 1 ) “Mt. George Quadrangle, California”, 7.5 minute series (1968);
( 2 ) “Fairfield North Quadrangle, California”, 7.5 minute series (1973);
( 3 ) “Fairfield South Quadrangle, California”, 7.5 minute series (1968); and
( 4 ) “Cordelia Quadrangle, California”, 7.5 minute series (1968).
( c ) *Boundaries.* The Suisun Valley viticultural area is located in Solano County, California. The beginning point is the intersection of the Southern Pacific Railroad track with range line “R3W/R2W” in the town of Cordelia, located on U.S.G.S. map “Cordelia Quadrangle.” ( 1 ) From the beginning point, the boundary runs northeast in a straight line to the intersection of Ledgewood Creek with township line “T5N/T4N”;
( 2 ) Thence in a straight line in a northeast direction to Bench Mark (BM) 19 located in the town of Fairfield;
( 3 ) Thence in a straight line due north to Soda Springs Creek;
( 4 ) Thence in a straight line in a northwest direction to the extreme southeast corner of Napa County located just south of Section 34, Township 6 North, Range 2 West;
( 5 ) Thence due west along the Napa/Solano County border to where it intersects with range line “R3W/R2W”;
( 6 ) Thence due south along range line “R3W/R2W” to the point of beginning.
[T.D. ATF-117, 47 FR 52997, Nov. 24, 1982]
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

DAY ELEV

 123.76

 123.10

 124.03

 124.40

 124.59

 123.69

 124.10

 124.11

 123.37

 123.07

 122.44

 124.05

 124.12

 122.83

 123.88

 123.32

 124.30

 123.75

 123.42

 124.22

 123.63

 123.99

 124.20

 124.51

 124.59

 124.47

 124.28

 124.32

 123.74

 122.40

 8,148

 7,838

 8,276

 8,461

 8,556

 8,115

 8,311

 8,316

 7,965

 7,824

 7,539

 8,286

 8,321

 7,715

 8,205

 7,941

 8,411

 8,144

 7,988

 8,371

 8,087

 8,256

 8,361

 8,516

 8,556

 8,496

 8,401

 8,421

 8,139

 7,521

STORAGE

-61

-310

+438

+185

+95

-441

+196

+5

-351

-141

-285

+747

+35

-606

+490

-264

+470

-267

-156

+383

-284

+169

+105

+155

+40

-60

-95

+20

-282

-618

CHANGE

1,762

1,653

2,009

1,879

1,925

1,676

1,906

2,044

1,864

1,976

1,903

2,425

2,065

1,739

2,298

1,918

2,287

1,932

2,007

2,285

1,888

2,118

2,072

1,623

1,068

983

966

1,032

883

718

INFLOW

 1,742

 1,758

 1,738

 1,736

 1,827

 1,848

 1,756

 1,991

 1,986

 1,987

 1,987

 1,987

 1,986

 1,985

 1,990

 1,990

 1,988

 2,002

 2,010

 2,008

 1,945

 1,959

 1,954

 1,486

 998

 963

 963

 966

 964

 963

POWER

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

SPILL

 48

 48

 48

 48

 48

 48

 48

 48

 48

 48

 48

 48

 48

 48

 48

 48

 48

 48

 48

 48

 48

 48

 48

 48

 48

 48

 48

 48

 48

 48

HATCHERY

 3

 3

 2

 2

 2

 2

 3

 2

 2

 2

 2

 3

 3

 2

 3

 3

 4

 3

 3

 3

 3

 3

 2

 3

 2

 2

 3

 3

 3

 4

C.F.S.

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

APRIL 2021 LAKE NATOMA DAILY OPERATIONS RUN DATE: May 1, 2021

IN LAKE

EVAP

C.F.S.

COMPUTED*

ACRE-FEET

RELEASE - C.F.S.

TOTALS -688 52,904 51,463 0 1,440 80

ACRE-FEET -688 104,935 102,077 0 2,856 159

COMMENTS:

* COMPUTED INFLOW IS THE SUM OF CHANGE IN STORAGE, RELEASES AND EVAPORATION.

SUMMARY

RELEASES (ACRE-FEET)

POWER 102,077

SPILL 0

FOLSOM SOUTH CANAL

HATCHERY

 532

 2,856

 8,209

FOLSOM

SOUTH 

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 5

 10

 10

 10

 10

 10

 10

 10

 10

 14

 25

 33

 35

 23

 15

 8

 0

 0

 0

 5

 10

 15

 268

 532

(1)

(1) INCHES OF EVAPORATION TAKEN FROM FOLSOM PAN.

RELEASES (ACRE-FEET) 

TOTAL 105,465
#### State Insurance Company of Des Moines v. Lola M. Hunt.

Filed February 2, 1898.

No. 7796.

Insurance: Withdrawal of Defense from Jury. It is error to withdraw from the consideration of the jury any valid defense which the evidence tends to establish.

Eiiroii from tlie district odurt of Dakota county. Tried below before Nonius, J.

*Reversed.*

*O. J.. Gurloio,*for plaintiff in error.

*Mcll G. J ay*and *J ay & Beck, eontra.*

Sullivan, J.

On April 11, 1891, the State Insurance Company issued a policy of insurance to Lola M. Hunt for a term of five years on a dwelling-house located in South Sioux City, in this state. The premises were occupied by the assured when the policy was issued. Subsequently, however, she removed to Sioux City, Iowa, and one O. A, Anderson, with.his family, entered into possession of the property and continued to occupy it until August 23, 1893. On the morning of the following day it was entirely destroyed by fire. In an action brought to recover for the loss sustained the company alleged and relied on a violation of the following provisions of the policy: “Or if without written consent hereon * * * the risk be increased by any means; or if there is any change in the occupant or occupancy of the premises insured; or if the buildings or either of them become vacant, * * -x- |}ieil in every such case this policy shall be void.” There was a verdict and judgment in favor of Hunt, and the insurance company has brought the case here for review by petition in error.

On the trial the company offered to prove that when Hunt vacated the property it remained unoccupied for *604a period of ten days or more. This'offer was refused and the defendant excepted. In stating the issues the court instructed the jury that “Defendant, the insurance company, answering, admits that the policy was issued; that the premium was , aid, and that the dwelling-house was destroyed by fire while such policy was in force, and that proof of loss was duly made, resting its defense upon the alleged fact that the plaintiff procured or caused the fire that destroyed the dwelling-house to be set for the purpose of securing the insurance money from this and other companies, and also, that the hazard to the building had been increased by the act of the plaintiff by leaving said house vacant at the time it was burned.” Upon the giving of this instruction as well as upon the rejection of the offer above mentioned error is assigned. That the instruction complained of withdrew from the consideration of the jury the defenses based on change of occupants and non-occupancy must be conceded, and the action of the court in this regard cannot be justified on the assumption that theré was no evidence tending to establish these defenses or either of them. The judgment of the district court is reversed and the cause remanded for further proceedings.

Reversed and remanded.
_________________________________________ 

 

 

Order Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan 

January 22, 2008 Clifford W. Taylor,

 Chief Justice 

135231 Michael F. Cavanagh 

Elizabeth A. Weaver 

Marilyn Kelly 

Maura D. Corrigan 

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff-Appellee, 

Robert P. Young, Jr. 

Stephen J. Markman,

 Justices 

v SC: 135231 

 COA: 279619 

Wayne CC: 06-007301-01

TODD AARON COLBERT,

Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/ 

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the September 21, 2007 

order of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not 

persuaded that the question presented should be reviewed by this Court. 

t0114 

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

January 22, 2008 

 Clerk
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY ELEV

 583.72

 584.11

 585.25

 585.16

 585.10

 583.33

 584.86

 585.42

 584.02

 583.79

 584.01

 584.95

 585.23

 583.68

 582.73

 584.20

 583.21

 584.37

 585.18

 583.68

 585.01

 585.50

 585.53

 584.31

 584.97

 586.30

 585.40

 585.74

 585.93

 586.00

 586.53

 21,720

 21,958

 22,664

 22,607

 22,570

 21,483

 22,421

 22,771

 21,902

 21,763

 21,896

 22,476

 22,651

 21,696

 21,122

 22,013

 21,410

 22,118

 22,620

 21,696

 22,513

 22,821

 22,840

 22,081

 22,488

 23,326

 22,758

 22,972

 23,091

 23,135

 23,473

STORAGE

-590

+238

+706

-57

-37

-1,087

+938

+350

-869

-139

+133

+580

+175

-955

-574

+891

-603

+708

+502

-924

+817

+308

+19

-759

+407

+838

-568

+214

+119

+44

+338

CHANGE

12,660

12,992

12,882

12,454

12,456

11,960

12,998

12,744

12,071

12,442

11,909

12,080

11,886

11,343

10,832

11,508

10,717

10,724

10,547

9,794

9,921

9,455

9,311

9,294

10,170

10,516

9,849

9,532

9,375

9,331

9,559

INFLOW

 12,951

 12,861

 12,518

 12,475

 12,469

 12,501

 12,520

 12,562

 12,501

 12,505

 11,834

 11,782

 11,792

 11,817

 11,114

 11,052

 11,013

 10,361

 10,287

 10,253

 9,504

 9,294

 9,298

 9,672

 9,960

 10,088

 10,128

 9,416

 9,309

 9,300

 9,385

POWER

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

SPILL

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

FISHTRAP

 6

 11

 8

 8

 6

 7

 5

 6

 8

 7

 8

 6

 6

 7

 7

 7

 8

 6

 7

 7

 5

 6

 3

 5

 5

 6

 7

 8

 6

 9

 4

C.F.S.

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

AUGUST 2001 KESWICK RESERVOIR DAILY OPERATIONS RUN DATE: September 20, 2001

RES.

EVAP

C.F.S.

COMPUTED*

ACRE-FEET

RELEASE - C.F.S. 

TOTALS +1,163 343,312 342,522 0 0 205

ACRE-FEET +1,163 680,959 679,392 0 0 407

SUMMARY

RELEASE (ACRE-FEET)

POWER 679,392

SPILL 0

 22,310

FISH TRAP 0

SPRING

CR. P. P.

RELEASE (1)

 2,448

 2,436

 2,482

 2,445

 2,459

 2,481

 2,725

 2,486

 2,488

 2,475

 2,478

 2,498

 2,481

 2,465

 2,580

 2,470

 2,471

 2,482

 2,578

 2,556

 2,476

 2,672

 2,589

 2,487

 2,472

 2,478

 2,502

 2,500

 2,494

 2,486

 2,505

 77,645

 154,009

*COMPUTED INFLOW IS SUM OF CHANGE IN STORAGE, RELEASES, AND EVAPORATION.

(1) EVAPORATION RECORDS TAKEN FROM SHASTA PAN.

SHASTA

RELEASE

C.F.S

 11,223

 11,238

 11,442

 10,483

 10,842

 10,150

 10,739

 10,654

 9,034

 10,029

 9,483

 9,924

 9,350

 8,534

 10,382

 9,008

 8,169

 8,196

 7,745

 7,320

 7,190

 6,997

 6,627

 6,775

 7,575

 8,340

 7,419

 6,996

 6,716

 7,068

 7,316

 272,964

 541,424

Table 8
#### § 30.10 Are all OWCP records relating to claims filed under EEOICPA considered confidential?

All OWCP records relating to claims for benefits under EEOICPA are considered confidential and may not be released, inspected, copied or otherwise disclosed except as provided in the Freedom of Information Act and the Privacy Act of 1974.
### §7516. Administrative provisions

#### (a) Application required

No grant may be made under this part, and no contract may be entered into under this part, unless the entity seeking the grant or contract submits an application to the Secretary at such time, in such manner, and containing such information as the Secretary may determine to be necessary to carry out the provisions of this part.

#### (b) Special rule

Each applicant for a grant or contract under this part shall submit the application for comment to the local educational agency serving students who will participate in the program to be carried out under the grant or contract, and include those comments, if any, with the application to the Secretary.

(Pub. L. 89–10, title VI, §6206, formerly title VII, §7206, as added Pub. L. 107–110, title VII, §701, Jan. 8, 2002, 115 Stat. 1941; renumbered title VI, §6206, Pub. L. 114–95, title VI, §6001(a), (b)(1), Dec. 10, 2015, 129 Stat. 2046.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Prior Provisions

A prior section 7516, Pub. L. 89–10, title VII, §7206, as added Pub. L. 103–382, title I, §101, Oct. 20, 1994, 108 Stat. 3739, authorized appropriations for foreign language assistance, prior to the general amendment of former subchapter VII of this chapter by Pub. L. 107–110.
prejudice or a miscarriage of justice." Id. (internal quotation marks

omitted). First, White contends that the State committed misconduct during its cross-examination of him by (1) continually commenting on his "ancillary actions" prior to the shooting, (2) commenting on his failure to show remorse, (3) using inflammatory language, and (4) portraying him as a bad person. Having reviewed the questions and answers cited by White as examples of this kind of prosecutorial misconduct, we conclude that it is not plain or clear from the record that the State's cross-examination was improper. Therefore, White has not demonstrated plain error.

Second, White contends that the State committed misconduct by using leading questions during direct examination of a witness and the district court erred by failing to limit the leading questions sua sponte.
See NRS 50.115(3)(a). We conclude that any prejudice that may have resulted from the leading questions did not rise to the level of affecting White's substantial rights. Therefore, White is not entitled to the reversal of his conviction based on the State's examination of this witness.

Third, White contends that cumulative error requires the reversal of his conviction. One error, however, cannot cumulate. See State v. Perry, 245 P.3d 961, 982 (Idaho 2010); United States v. Sager, 227 F.3d 1138, 1149 (9th Cir. 2000); Hoxsie v. Kerby, 108 F.3d 1239, 1245 (10th Cir. 1997).

SUPREME COURT OF NEVADA 2

(0) 1947A

# 0 12 41.

Douglas # Cherry J.

Having considered White's contentions and concluded that he is not entitled to relief, we'

ORDER the judgment of conviction AFFIRMED.



# traAl n Hardesty

cc: Hon. Jennifer P. Togliatti, District Judge Patti, Sgro & Lewis Attorney General/Carson City Clark County District Attorney Eighth District Court Clerk

'The fast track statement fails to comply with NRAP 3C(h)(1) and NRAP 32(a)(4) because it does not contain 1-inch margins on all four sides. Counsel is cautioned that the failure to comply with the briefing requirements in the future may result in the imposition of sanctions. See NRAP 3C(n).

SUPREME COURT OF NEVADA 3

(0) 1941A 

### e
Exhibit 32SECTION 1350 CERTIFICATIONEach of the undersigned, S.W. Yong, President and Chief Executive Officer of Trio-TechInternational, a California corporation (the “Company”), and Victor H.M. Ting, Vice President andChief Financial Officer of the Company, do hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 asadopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of hisknowledge (1) the quarterly report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the nine months ended March 31,2007, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), fullycomplies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, asamended, and (2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.         /s/ S. W. YONG         Name: S. W. Yong    Title: President and Chief Executive Officer    Dated: May 10, 2007           /s/ VICTOR H. M. TING         Name: Victor H.M. Ting    Title: Vice President and Chief Financial Officer    Dated: May 10, 2007  A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other documentauthenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed formwithin the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been providedto the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and ExchangeCommission or its staff upon request.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
<CURRENCY> U.S. DOLLARS

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1999
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                1.00000
<CASH>                                          42,148
<SECURITIES>                                     4,482
<RECEIVABLES>                                   40,913
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                      5,026
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               114,059
<PP&E>                                          88,347
<DEPRECIATION>                                (26,849)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 330,541
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          121,525
<BONDS>                                         64,541
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         2,651
<OTHER-SE>                                      80,386
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   330,541
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               185,501
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  161,953
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                12,666
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               5,069
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  4,667
<INCOME-TAX>                                     6,626
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (1,959)
<DISCONTINUED>                                (73,682)
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                     (12,112)
<NET-INCOME>                                  (87,753)
<EPS-BASIC>                                    (3.390)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (3.38)


</TABLE>
#### Viola H. Babcock, Appellant, v. Charles A. Babcock, Respondent.

Appeal from an order granting defendant’s (husband) motion to open a default in an action for separation. Order unanimously affirmed, without costs. Present — Hill, P. J., Heffernan, Brewster, Foster and Russell, JJ.