alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 367.2 Past-due legally enforceable debt. A past-due legally enforceable debt which may be referred to another governmental agency for administrative offset is a debt: ( a ) Which arose under any statute administered by the Board or under any contract; and with respect to debts referred to the Department of Treasury, is a nontax debt;
( b ) Which is an obligation of a debtor who is a natural person or a business;
( c ) Which, except in the case of a judgment debt, has been delinquent at least three months but not more than ten years at the time the offset is made;
( d ) Which is at least $25.00;
( e ) With respect to which the rights described in part 260 or 320 of this chapter or the applicable law regarding reconsideration, waiver, and appeal, if applicable, have been exhausted;
( f ) With respect to which: ( 1 ) The Board's records do not contain evidence that the debtor (or, if an individual, his or her spouse) has filed for bankruptcy under title 11 of the United States Code; or
( 2 ) The Board can clearly establish at the time of the referral that the automatic stay under section 362 of the Bankruptcy Code has been lifted or is no longer in effect with respect to the debtor (or, if an individual, his or her spouse) and the debt was not discharged in the bankruptcy proceeding; or
( 3 ) The Board's records do not contain evidence that foreclosure is pending on collateral securing the debt.
( g ) Which cannot currently be collected pursuant to the salary offset provisions of 5 U.S.C. 5514(a)(1);
( h ) Which cannot currently be collected by administrative offset under § 255.6 or § 340.6 of this chapter against amounts payable to the debtor under any statute administered by the Board;
( i ) With respect to which the Board has notified, or has made a reasonable attempt to notify, the debtor that the debt is past due, and that unless the debtor repays the debt within 60 days, the debt will be referred to any other agency of the United States government for offset against any money owed the debtor by that agency; and
( j ) With respect to which the Board has given the debtor at least 60 days from the date of the notification required in paragraph (i) of this section to present evidence that all or part of the debt is not past due or legally enforceable, has considered evidence, if any, presented by the debtor, and has determined that the amount of such debt is past due and legally enforceable; and
( k ) Which has not been referred to the Department of Justice or which is not otherwise in litigation with the Board.
[56 FR 46375, Sept. 12, 1991, as amended at 60 FR 66073, Dec. 21, 1995; 62 FR 19220, Apr. 21, 1997]
htgm-ex105_12.htm



EXHIBIT 10.5

Amendment No. 3 to Statement of Work No. Two

 THIS AMENDMENT No. 3 (hereinafter "Amendment 3") to Statement of Work No. Two is effective as of September 27, 2018 (the "Amendment 3 Effective Date") by and between HTG Molecular Diagnostics, Inc. ("HTG") and QIAGEN Manchester Limited (“QIAGEN").

Whereas, QIAGEN and HTG entered into that certain Statement of Work No. Two, dated June 2, 2017 ("SOW 2"), first amended effective July 2, 2018 ("Amendment 1"), and again amended effective August 14, 2018 ("Amendment 2") (collectively, the "Agreement") and the parties now desire to modify their profit-sharing arrangement under the Agreement;

Now, therefore, based upon the above premise, and in consideration of the mutual covenants and conditions contained in the Agreement and herein, the parties agree as follows:

1. Solely for purposes of the original development activities contemplated under SOW 2, as exchanged between the parties on October 30, 2017 (the “Original Development Activities"), the profit sharing activities contemplated in paragraph 6.5 of SOW 2 shall commence upon the later of the completion of the Original Development Activities or the Amendment 3 Effective Date, rather than at the end of each calendar quarter. The foregoing modification shall apply only to those Original Development Activities which have been or will be completed and which have not yet been subject to profit-sharing as of the Amendment 3 Effective Date.

2. Solely for purposes of the additional development activities contemplated under Amendment 1 to SOW 2, as exchanged between the parties on August 2, 2018 (the "Amendment 1 Development Activities"), the profit sharing activities contemplated in paragraph 6.5 of SOW 2 shall commence upon the later of the completion of the Amendment 1 Development Activities or the Amendment 3 Effective Date, rather than at the end of each calendar quarter. The foregoing modification shall apply only to those Amendment 1 Development Activities which have been or will be completed and which have not yet been subject to profit-sharing as of the Amendment 3 Effective Date.

3. Except as noted above, the Agreement as originally stated shall remain in full force and effect.


	
 
	
4.
	
This Amendment may be executed in one of more counterparts, each of which shall be deemed an original, and all of which together shall be deemed to be one and the same instrument. Facsimile or other electronically transmitted signatures shall be deemed original signatures.






	
 
	
HTG/QIAGEN CONFIDENTIAL
	
Page 1 of 2






 

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, HTG and QIAGEN each has caused this Amendment 3 to be executed by its respective duly authorized representative as of the Amendment 3 Effective Date.

 

 



HTG MOLECULAR DIAGNOSTICS

 

	
 
	
By: /s/ Timothy B. Johnson
	




 

Name: Timothy B. Johnson

Title: President, Chief Executive Officer

 

 



QIAGEN MANCHESTER LIMITED

 

 

 

By: /s/ Thierry Bernard

 

Name: Thierry Bernard

 

Title:  Sr. VP, Business Area MDx

 



	
 
	
HTG/QIAGEN CONFIDENTIAL
	
Page 2 of 2
**Exhibit 18.1**

August 28, 2008 

Solera Holdings, Inc. 

15030 Avenue of Science 

San Diego, California 

Dear Sirs/Madams: 

We have audited the consolidated financial statements of Solera Holdings, Inc. and subsidiaries as ofJune 30, 2008 and 2007, and for each of the three years in the period ended June 30, 2008, included in your Annual Report on Form 10-K to the Securities and Exchange Commission and have issued our report thereon dated August 28,2008, relating to the consolidated financial statements of Solera Holdings, Inc. (which report expresses an unqualified opinion and includes an explanatory paragraph regarding the adoption of Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) StatementNo. 158, *Employers’ Accounting for Defined Benefit Pension and Other Postretirement Plans — an amendment of FASB Statements No. 87, 88, 106, and 132(R)*, on June 30, 2007; FASB Statement No. 123(R), *Share-BasedPayment*, on July 1, 2006; and FASB Interpretation No. 48, *Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes — an Interpretation of FASB Statement No. 109*, on July 1, 2007). Note 1 to such financial statements contains adescription of your change, during the year ended June 30, 2008, in the date for the annual goodwill impairment test for your reporting units. In our judgment, such change is to an alternative accounting principle that is preferable under thecircumstances. 

Yours truly, 

***/s/ DELOITTE &TOUCHE LLP***

San Jose, California 

August 28, 2008
### §75b. Establishment of National Portrait Gallery; functions

(a) There is established in the Smithsonian Institution a bureau which shall be known as the National Portrait Gallery. The functions of such bureau shall be those authorized by this subchapter. The use for the purposes of the Gallery of any part of the building transferred to the Smithsonian Institution pursuant to the Act of March 28, 1958 (72 Stat. 68), is authorized.

(b) The Gallery shall function as a free public museum for the exhibition and study of portraiture and statuary depicting men and women who have made significant contributions to the history, development, and culture of the people of the United States and of the artists who created such portraiture and statuary.

(Pub. L. 87–443, §3, Apr. 27, 1962, 76 Stat. 62.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

Act of March 28, 1958, referred to in subsec. (a), is act Mar. 28, 1958, Pub. L. 85–357, 72 Stat. 68, which was not classified to the Code.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Patent Office Building Improvements

Pub. L. 108–72, §3, Aug. 15, 2003, 117 Stat. 888, provided that:

"(a) Authorization of Use of Funds.—

"(1) In general.—The Board of Regents of the Smithsonian Institution may plan, design, and construct improvements to the interior and exterior of the Patent Office Building (including the construction of a roof covering for the courtyard), using funds available to the Institution from nonappropriated sources.

"(2) Definition.—In this section, the term 'Patent Office Building' means the building transferred to the Smithsonian Institution pursuant to Public Law 85–357 [72 Stat. 68].

"(b) Design and Specifications.—The design and specifications for any exterior alterations authorized by subsection (a) shall be—

"(1) submitted by the Secretary of the Smithsonian Institution (referred to in this section as the 'Secretary') to the Commission of Fine Arts for comments and recommendations; and

"(2) subject to the review and approval of the National Capital Planning Commission in accordance with section 8722 of title 40, United States Code, and section 16 of the Act of June 20, 1938 (sec. 6–641.15, D.C. Official Code).

"(c) Authority of Historic Preservation Agencies.—

"(1) In general.—The Secretary shall—

"(A) take into account the effect of the improvements authorized by subsection (a) on the historic character of the Patent Office Building; and

"(B) provide the Advisory Council on Historic Preservation a reasonable opportunity to comment with regard to such improvements.

"(2) Status of smithsonian.—In carrying out this subsection, and in carrying out other projects in the District of Columbia which are subject to the review and approval of the National Capital Planning Commission in accordance with section 16 of the Act of June 20, 1938 (sec. 6–641.15, D.C. Official Code), the Smithsonian Institution shall be deemed to be an agency for purposes of compliance with regulations promulgated by the Advisory Council on Historic Preservation pursuant to section 106 of the National Historic Preservation Act ([former] 16 U.S.C. 470f) [see 54 U.S.C. 306108]."
EXHIBIT 32

                CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                       AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906
                        OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection  with the Annual Report of Century Pacific  Financial  Corporation
(the  "Company")  on Form 10-KSB for the year ending  September  30, 2005,  (the
"Report"),  I, Kevin R. Keating, the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial
Officer of the Company,  certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

1)    The Report fully  complies with the  requirement of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
      of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2)    The information  contained in the Report fairly presents,  in all material
      respects, the Company's financial position and results of operations.


Date: November 3, 2005                             /s/ Kevin R. Keating
                                                   -----------------------------
                                                   Chief Executive Officer
                                                   and Chief Financial Officer
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY HIGH

 18,761

 18,414

 19,021

 19,528

 19,086

 20,236

 20,367

 20,950

 20,600

 20,620

 20,966

 20,932

 21,555

 22,139

 20,092

 20,378

 18,965

 19,387

 19,742

 19,577

 19,244

 19,277

 19,485

 20,219

 21,311

 20,057

 20,119

 19,416

 17,980

 18,699

 17,840

 9,890

 9,443

 9,161

 9,675

 10,787

 11,657

 10,621

 12,011

 12,105

 12,040

 11,509

 10,505

 10,682

 11,403

 12,822

 12,759

 13,534

 11,175

 12,104

 12,241

 11,548

 11,389

 10,677

 10,550

 11,412

 11,281

 9,880

 9,569

 9,176

 9,232

 9,928

 14,191

 14,207

 14,428

 14,708

 15,001

 15,849

 15,781

 16,305

 16,106

 16,084

 15,202

 15,234

 16,073

 17,223

 16,819

 16,366

 16,361

 15,571

 15,984

 16,155

 15,324

 15,056

 15,041

 15,296

 16,702

 15,453

 14,846

 14,285

 13,896

 13,836

 14,260

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

OCTOBER 2014 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: November 3, 2014

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

PITTSBURG BOTTOM ON THE SACRAMENTO RIVER
```

[Congressional Bills 114th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 3906 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

114th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 3906

 To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to extend for one year the 
           credit for residential energy efficient property.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            November 3, 2015

 Mr. Grayson introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                      Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to extend for one year the 
           credit for residential energy efficient property.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. EXTENSION OF CREDIT FOR RESIDENTIAL ENERGY EFFICIENT 
              PROPERTY.

    (a) In General.--Section 25D(g) of the Internal Revenue Code of 
1986 is amended by striking ``December 31, 2016'' and inserting 
``December 31, 2017''.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendments made by this section shall 
apply to property placed in service after December 31, 2016.
                                 <all>
```
#### Florence Proctor, Individually and as Guardian ad Litem of Richard Wilber, an Infant, Appellant, v. Board of Education, Olean City School District, Respondent.

Present ■—Crosby, P. J., Taylor, Dowling, Harris and MeCurn, JJ.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

DAY HIGH

 187

 176

 262

 207

 163

 152

 146

 142

 139

 148

 139

 145

 133

 137

 137

 124

 116

 111

 109

 107

 106

 111

 114

 115

 118

 124

 120

 122

 120

 156

 155

 144

 145

 129

 132

 128

 128

 127

 124

 124

 116

 119

 115

 114

 115

 103

 98

 92

 89

 88

 97

 99

 102

 101

 99

 100

 96

 97

 174

 163

 165

 161

 144

 138

 134

 133

 131

 131

 129

 127

 124

 125

 125

 119

 109

 105

 99

 95

 95

 102

 106

 108

 109

 112

 110

 111

 109

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

FEBRUARY 2000 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: March 23, 2000

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

PITTSBURG BOTTOM ON THE SACRAMENTO RIVER
<PAGE>   1
                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.1


               CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT CERTIFIED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS


                We have issued our report dated February 8, 2001 (except for
Note C as to which the date is March 7, 2001) accompanying the financial
statements and schedule included in the Annual Report of The Sportsman's Guide,
Inc. on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2000. We hereby consent
to the incorporation by reference of said report in the Registration Statements
of The Sportsman's Guide, Inc. on Forms S-8 (File No.333-26311, effective May 1,
1997; File No. 333-26313, effective May 1, 1997; File No. 333-26315, effective
May 1, 1997; File No. 333-26317, effective May 1,1997; File No. 333-39765,
effective November 7, 1997; and File No. 333-80869, effective June 17, 1999) and
on Form S-3 (File No. 333-50369, effective May 8, 1998).



                                                          /s/ Grant Thornton LLP

Minneapolis, Minnesota
March 23, 2001
#### § 402.70 Reasons for withholding some records.

Section 552(b) of the Freedom of Information Act contains nine exemptions to the mandatory disclosure of records. We describe these exemptions in §§ 402.75 through 402.110 of this part and explain how we apply them to disclosure determinations. (In some cases more than one exemption may apply to the same document.) Information obtained by the agency from any individual or organization, furnished in reliance on a provision for confidentiality authorized by applicable statute or regulation, will not be disclosed, to the extent it can be withheld under one of these exemptions. This section does not itself authorize the giving of any pledge of confidentiality by any officer or employee of the agency.
§ 10.205 What conditions must be met to receive COP? ( a ) To be eligible for COP, a person must: ( 1 ) Have a “traumatic injury” as defined at § 10.5(ee) which is job-related and the cause of the disability, and/or the cause of lost time due to the need for medical examination and treatment;
( 2 ) File Form CA-1 within 30 days of the date of the injury (but if that form is not available, using another form would not alone preclude receipt); and
( 3 ) Begin losing time from work due to the traumatic injury within 45 days of the injury.
( b ) OWCP may find that the employee is not entitled to COP for other reasons consistent with the statute (see § 10.220).
§ 30.712 When and how are fees reduced? ( a ) OWCP shall accept a provider's designation of the code to identify a billed procedure or service if the code is consistent with medical reports and other evidence, and will pay no more than the maximum allowable fee for that procedure. If the code is not consistent with the medical and other evidence or where no code is supplied, the bill will be returned to the provider for correction and resubmission.
( b ) If the charge submitted for a service supplied to an employee exceeds the maximum amount determined to be reasonable according to the schedule, OWCP shall pay the amount allowed by the schedule for that service and shall notify the provider in writing that payment was reduced for that service in accordance with the schedule. OWCP shall also notify the provider of the method for requesting reconsideration of the balance of the charge. The decision of OWCP to pay less than the charged amount is final when issued and is not subject to the adjudicatory process described in subpart D of this part.
[84 FR 3056, Feb. 8, 2019]
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY HIGH

 20,969

 23,399

 23,769

 21,470

 20,695

 21,383

 21,648

 18,852

 19,450

 17,338

 17,401

 18,242

 21,972

 23,213

 23,874

 24,182

 24,126

 24,907

 24,784

 25,110

 24,879

 23,509

 22,132

 20,607

 19,905

 19,516

 20,285

 20,155

 22,125

 20,990

 21,330

 7,770

 8,720

 8,444

 7,348

 7,509

 7,693

 6,882

 7,033

 7,355

 7,015

 7,253

 8,008

 9,079

 11,002

 8,474

 10,841

 10,404

 10,116

 10,354

 6,859

 9,665

 9,564

 9,334

 9,315

 6,422

 7,512

 6,926

 9,612

 9,225

 9,204

 8,713

 13,392

 15,017

 14,700

 13,947

 14,366

 14,804

 13,958

 13,611

 13,717

 12,761

 12,341

 12,332

 13,693

 14,907

 15,226

 16,536

 16,660

 16,749

 17,066

 14,494

 16,440

 16,410

 15,849

 15,702

 13,809

 14,805

 13,918

 14,091

 14,377

 13,802

 14,661

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

JULY 2020 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: August 4, 2020

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

PORT CHICAGO TOP IN SUISUN BAY
cc: Hon. Thomas L. Stockard, District Judge Tina Bixman Troy Curtis Jordan Attorney General/Carson City Churchill County Clerk

SUPREME COURT

OF NEVADA CLERK'S ORDER 2 (0)-1947
#### § 234.33 Survivor annuities.

Any survivor annuity which is unpaid at the death of the survivor is paid in the same order and amounts as described in § 234.31(a) and § 234.31(c) through § 234.31(f).
RB

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA

No. DA 19-0489

STATE OF MONTANA,

Plaintiff and Appellee,

v.

KYLE W. NELSON,

Defendant and Appellant.

ORDER

Upon consideration of Appellee’s motion for a 60-day extension of time, 

and good cause appearing therefor,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Appellee is granted an extension of time

to and including September 24, 2020, within which to prepare, serve, and file the 

State’s response.

Electronically signed by:

Mike McGrath

Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

July 18 2020

07/20/2020

Case Number: DA 19-0489
### §7429. State educational agency review

Before submitting an application to the Secretary under section 7424 of this title, a local educational agency shall submit the application to the State educational agency, which may comment on such application. If the State educational agency comments on the application, the agency shall comment on all applications submitted by local educational agencies in the State and shall provide those comments to the respective local educational agencies, with an opportunity to respond.

(Pub. L. 89–10, title VI, §6119, formerly title VII, §7119, as added Pub. L. 107–110, title VII, §701, Jan. 8, 2002, 115 Stat. 1919; renumbered title VI, §6119, and amended Pub. L. 114–95, title VI, §6001(a), (b)(1), (9), Dec. 10, 2015, 129 Stat. 2046, 2047.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Prior Provisions

A prior section 7429, Pub. L. 89–10, title VII, §7119, as added Pub. L. 103–382, title I, §101, Oct. 20, 1994, 108 Stat. 3727, authorized subgrants, prior to the general amendment of former subchapter VII of this chapter by Pub. L. 107–110.

Prior sections 7430 to 7434 were omitted in the general amendment of former subchapter VII of this chapter by Pub. L. 107–110.

Section 7430, Pub. L. 89–10, title VII, §7120, as added Pub. L. 103–382, title I, §101, Oct. 20, 1994, 108 Stat. 3727, related to priority on funding of programs for limited English proficient students.

Section 7431, Pub. L. 89–10, title VII, §7121, as added Pub. L. 103–382, title I, §101, Oct. 20, 1994, 108 Stat. 3728, related to coordination with other programs.

Section 7432, Pub. L. 89–10, title VII, §7122, as added Pub. L. 103–382, title I, §101, Oct. 20, 1994, 108 Stat. 3728, related to programs for Native Americans and Puerto Rico.

Section 7433, Pub. L. 89–10, title VII, §7123, as added Pub. L. 103–382, title I, §101, Oct. 20, 1994, 108 Stat. 3728, related to evaluations.

Section 7434, Pub. L. 89–10, title VII, §7124, as added Pub. L. 103–382, title I, §101, Oct. 20, 1994, 108 Stat. 3728, related to construction of provisions.

#### Amendments

2015—Pub. L. 114–95, §6001(b)(9), made technical amendment to reference in original act which appears in text as reference to section 7424 of this title.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date of 2015 Amendment

Amendment by Pub. L. 114–95 effective Dec. 10, 2015, except with respect to certain noncompetitive programs and competitive programs, see section 5 of Pub. L. 114–95, set out as a note under section 6301 of this title.