20954 Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 72 / Thursday, April 14, 2011 / Notices 

1This action includes Court No. 06–00395 and 

Court No. 06–00399. 

2See Notice of Final Determination of Sales at 

Less Than Fair Value, and Negative Determination 

of Critical Circumstances: Certain Lined Paper 

Products from India, 71 FR 45012 (August 8, 2006) 

(‘‘Final Determination’’). 

3Notice of Amended Final Determination of Sales 

at Less Than Fair Value: Certain Lined Paper 

Products from the People’s Republic of China; 

Notice of Antidumping Duty Orders: Certain Lined 

Paper Products from India, Indonesia and the 

People’s Republic of China; and Notice of 

Countervailing Duty Orders: Certain Lined Paper 

Products from India and Indonesia, 71 FR 56949 

(September 28, 2006) (‘‘Antidumping Duty Order’’). 

of no instruments of equivalent 

scientific value to the foreign 

instruments described below, for such 

purposes as this is intended to be used, 

that was being manufactured in the 

United States at the time of its order. 

Reasons: Unique features of this 

instrument include its arbitrary 

excitation angle, large frequency, force, 

displacement range and spectral output 

purity. It is also unique in that it 

included the ability to rotate to varying 

degrees. 

Docket Number: 11–017. Applicant: 

University of Chicago Argonne, LLC, 

Lemont, IL 60439. Instrument: Electron 

Guns for Caribu EBIS Charge Breeder. 

Manufacturer: Budker Institute of 

Nuclear Physics, Russia. Intended Use: 

See notice at 76 FR 11200, March 1, 

2011. Comments: None received. 

Decision: Approved. We know of no 

instruments of equivalent scientific 

value to the foreign instruments 

described below, for such purposes as 

this is intended to be used, that was 

being manufactured in the United States 

at the time of its order. Reasons: The 

main requirement to the EBIS charge 

breeder is its high efficiency and long 

maintenance free operational period. 

Dated: April 8, 2011. 

Gregory W. Campbell, 

Director, Subsidies Enforcement Office, 

Import Administration. 

[FR Doc. 2011–9109 Filed 4–13–11; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P 

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE 

International Trade Administration 

[C–580–818] 

Corrosion-Resistant Carbon Steel Flat 

Products From the Republic of Korea: 

Extension of Time Limit for Preliminary 

Results of Countervailing Duty 

Administrative Review 

AGENCY: Import Administration, 

International Trade Administration, 

Department of Commerce. 

DATES: Effective Date: April 14, 2011. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Gayle Longest, AD/CVD Operations, 

Office 3, Import Administration, 

International Trade Administration, 

U.S. Department of Commerce, 14th 

Street and Constitution Avenue, NW., 

Washington, DC 20230; telephone: (202) 

482–3338. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Background 

On August 17, 1993, the Department 

published in the Federal Register the 

countervailing duty order on corrosionresistant carbon steel flat products 

(CORE) from Korea. See Countervailing 

Duty Orders and Amendments of Final 

Affirmative Countervailing Duty 

Determinations: Certain Steel Products 

from Korea, 58 FR 43752 (August 17, 

1993). On August 2, 2010, the 

Department published a notice of 

‘‘Opportunity to Request Administrative 

Review’’ of this countervailing duty 

order. See Antidumping or 

Countervailing Duty Order, Finding, or 

Suspended Investigation; Opportunity 

to Request Administrative Review, 75 

FR 45094 (August 2, 2010). In 

accordance with 19 CFR 

351.221(c)(1)(i), we published a notice 

of initiation of the administrative review 

on September 29, 2010, for the January 

1, 2009, through December 31, 2009, 

period of review (POR). See Initiation of 

Antidumping and Countervailing Duty 

Administrative Reviews and Requests 

for Revocation in Part, 75 FR 60076 

(September 29, 2010). The preliminary 

results for this review are currently due 

no later than May 3, 2011. 

Extension of Time Limits for 

Preliminary Results 

Section 751(a)(3)(A) of the Tariff Act 

of 1930, as amended (the Act), requires 

the Department to issue the preliminary 

results of an administrative review 

within 245 days after the last day of the 

anniversary month of an order for which 

a review is requested and the final 

results of review within 120 days after 

the date on which the preliminary 

results are published. If it is not 

practicable to complete the review 

within the time period, section 

751(a)(3)(A) of the Act allows the 

Department to extend these deadlines to 

a maximum of 365 days and 180 days, 

respectively. 

Because the Department will require 

additional time to review and analyze 

supplemental information expected 

from the Government of Korea and the 

respondent, Hyundai HYSCO Ltd., and 

may issue further supplemental 

questionnaires, it is not practicable to 

complete this review by the original 

deadline (i.e., May 3, 2011). Therefore, 

the Department is extending the time 

limit for completion of the preliminary 

results by 120 days to not later than 

August 31, 2011, in accordance with 

section 751(a)(3)(A) of the Act. 

We are issuing and publishing this 

notice in accordance with sections 

751(a)(1) and 777(i)(1) of the Act. 

Dated: April 8, 2011. 

Gary Taverman, 

Acting Deputy Assistant Secretary for 

Antidumping and Countervailing Duty 

Operations. 

[FR Doc. 2011–9111 Filed 4–13–11; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P 

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE 

International Trade Administration 

[A–533–843] 

Certain Lined Paper Products From 

India: Amended Final Determination of 

Sales at Less Than Fair Value 

AGENCY: Import Administration, 

International Trade Administration, 

Department of Commerce. 

SUMMARY: On December 13, 2010, the 

United States Court of Appeals for the 

Federal Circuit (‘‘CAFC’’) affirmed the 

United States Court of International 

Trade’s (‘‘CIT’s’’) decision sustaining the 

Department of Commerce’s (‘‘the 

Department’s’’) redetermination on 

remand of the final results of the 

antidumping duty investigation on 

certain lined paper products (‘‘CLPP’’) 

from India. See Association of American 

School Paper Suppliers v. United States, 

Court No. 2010–1219 (CAFC December 

13, 2010) (CAFC Rule 36 affirmance); 

see also Association of American School 

Paper Suppliers v. United States, 

Consol. Court No. 06–00395, Slip Op. 

09–136 (CIT December 10, 2009) 

(‘‘AASPS, Slip. Op. 09–136’’).1 This case 

arises out of the Department’s final 

determination of sales at less than fair 

value (‘‘LTFV’’) in the antidumping duty 

investigation of CLPP from India.2 As 

there is now a final and conclusive 

court decision in this action, the 

Department is amending the Final 

Determination and Antidumping Duty 

Order.3

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Christopher Hargett, AD/CVD 

Operations, Office 3, Import 

Administration, International Trade 

Administration, U.S. Department of 

Commerce, 14th Street and Constitution 

mstockstill on DSKH9S0YB1PROD with NOTICES