alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
### §643. Registration of business, name of person, and trade names

No person, firm, or corporation shall engage in business, in or for commerce, as a meat broker, renderer, or animal food manufacturer, or engage in business in commerce as a wholesaler of any carcasses, or parts or products of the carcasses, of any cattle, sheep, swine, goats, horses, mules, or other equines, whether intended for human food or other purposes, or engage in business as a public warehouseman storing any such articles in or for commerce, or engage in the business of buying, selling, or transporting in commerce, or importing, any dead, dying, disabled, or diseased animals of the specified kinds, or parts of the carcasses of any such animals that died otherwise than by slaughter, unless, when required by regulations of the Secretary, he has registered with the Secretary his name, and the address of each place of business at which, and all trade names under which, he conducts such business.

(Mar. 4, 1907, ch. 2907, title II, §203, as added Pub. L. 90–201, §14, Dec. 15, 1967, 81 Stat. 594.)
**EXHIBIT 99.30** 

 

**CONSENT OF SAMUEL MAH**

 

United States Securities and Exchange Commission

Gentlemen:

In connection with Silver Wheaton Corporation’s (the “Company”) Annual Report on Form 40-F for the year ended December 31, 2008 (the “Annual Report”), I, Samuel Mah, M.A.Sc., P.Eng., Director of Engineering (Company), hereby consent to the inclusion in, or incorporation by reference into, and the use of my name in connection with the preparation of the following            documents/reports:

 

| 1.     | Resource and reserve estimates of the Yauliyacu Mine;                                                            |
|--------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   |                                                                                                             |
| 2.     | Technical report dated March 25, 2009, entitled “Resource and Reserve Update, Yauliyacu Mine, Peru”; |
|   |                                                                                                             |
| 3.     | The Annual Report.                                                                                               |

 

Date: March 30, 2009

|   | Yours truly,/s/ Samuel Mah                                                                                                                                                   |
|--------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   | Name: Samuel Mah, M.A.Sc., P.EngTitle:   Director of Engineering             Silver Wheaton Corp. |
§ 220.126 Relationship of ability to do work and residual functional capacity. ( a ) If the claimant can do his or her previous work (his or her usual work or other applicable past work), the Board will determine he or she is not disabled.
( b ) If the residual functional capacity is not enough for the claimant to do any of his or her previous work, the Board must still decide if the claimant can do any other work. To determine whether the claimant can do other work, the Board will consider the claimant's residual functional capacity, and his or her age, education, and work experience. Any work (jobs) that the claimant can do must exist in significant numbers in the national economy (either in the region where he or she lives or in several regions of the country).
#### § 362.8 Investigation of a claim.

The Deputy General Counsel or his designee may investigate the circumstances surrounding the theft, loss or damage of an employee's property. In order to complete such investigation, the Deputy General Counsel or his designee may request the submission of information in addition to that described in § 362.7 of this part.

(45 U.S.C. 231f(b)(5))

[45 FR 57709, Aug. 29, 1980, as amended at 48 FR 51448, Nov. 9, 1983]
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Victor Manuel VARELA-MARQUEZ, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 05-51514

Conference Calendar.

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.

Decided July 13, 2006.

Joseph H. Gay, Jr., Assistant U.S. Attorney, U.S. Attorney’s Office Western District of Texas, San Antonio, TX, for Plaintiff-Appellee.

Judy Fulmer Madewell, Federal Public Defender’s Office Western District of Texas, San Antonio, TX, for Defendant-Appellant.

Before DAVIS, BARKSDALE, and DeMOSS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: *

Appealing the Judgment in a Criminal Case, Victor Manuel Varela-Marquez raises arguments that are foreclosed by *Almendarezr-Torres v. United States,*523 U.S. 224, 235, 118 S.Ct. 1219, 140 L.Ed.2d 350 (1998), which held that 8 U.S.C. § 1326(b)(2) is a penalty provision and not a separate criminal offense. The Government’s motion for summary affirmance is GRANTED, and the judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.

*

 Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.
(No. 73—CC—84

#### Paradyne Corporation, Claimant, *vs.*State of Illinois, Division of Telecommunications, Respondent.

*Opinion filed April 16, 1973.*

Paradyne Corporation, Claimant, pro se.

William J. Scott, Attorney General; William E. Webber, Assistant Attorney General, for Respondent.

Per Curiam.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY HIGH

 203

 184

 180

 182

 188

 184

 177

 174

 176

 173

 170

 165

 158

 156

 158

 160

 180

 173

 180

 181

 178

 164

 160

 161

 163

 167

 159

 172

 267

 441

 487

 162

 161

 153

 157

 159

 146

 150

 148

 155

 152

 150

 140

 148

 144

 143

 148

 150

 150

 153

 157

 156

 155

 141

 150

 148

 141

 145

 145

 146

 153

 156

 185

 174

 167

 168

 174

 165

 161

 162

 165

 165

 161

 156

 152

 150

 151

 154

 157

 157

 164

 166

 164

 159

 157

 154

 154

 151

 150

 152

 179

 222

 223

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

MAY 2003 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: June 11, 2003

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

PITTSBURG TOP ON THE SACRAMENTO RIVER
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

DAY HIGH

 374

 301

 274

 260

 245

 244

 236

 233

 237

 229

 222

 221

 210

 214

 222

 236

 208

 206

 191

 189

 191

 196

 198

 198

 205

 201

 195

 202

 208

 211

 290

 241

 239

 234

 226

 220

 208

 216

 203

 189

 200

 198

 198

 192

 197

 198

 184

 176

 169

 157

 167

 171

 170

 168

 171

 164

 167

 176

 173

 184

 321

 267

 259

 245

 234

 231

 223

 227

 221

 216

 215

 207

 205

 203

 212

 211

 195

 192

 180

 173

 178

 184

 188

 184

 189

 185

 179

 190

 192

 196

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

APRIL 2011 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: May 25, 2011

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

DELTA MENDOTA CANAL AT CHECK 13 (O'NEILL)
§ 220.59 Requesting examination by a specific physician, psychologist or institution—hearings officer hearing level. In an unusual case, a hearings officer may have reason to request an examination by a particular physician, psychologist or institution. Some examples include the following: ( a ) Conflicts in the existing medical evidence require resolution by a recognized authority in a particular specialty:
( b ) The impairment requires hospitalization for diagnostic purposes; or
( c ) The claimant's treating physician or psychologist is in the best position to submit a meaningful report.
§ 1002.35 Is a successor in interest an employer covered by USERRA? USERRA's definition of “employer” includes a successor in interest. In general, an employer is a successor in interest where there is a substantial continuity in operations, facilities, and workforce from the former employer. The determination whether an employer is a successor in interest must be made on a case-by-case basis using a multi-factor test that considers the following: ( a ) Whether there has been a substantial continuity of business operations from the former to the current employer;
( b ) Whether the current employer uses the same or similar facilities, machinery, equipment, and methods of production;
( c ) Whether there has been a substantial continuity of employees;
( d ) Whether there is a similarity of jobs and working conditions;
( e ) Whether there is a similarity of supervisors or managers; and,
( f ) Whether there is a similarity of products or services.
Exhibit 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

      In connection with the Annual Report of Beaconsfield I, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-KSB for the year ended December 31, 2005 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Andrew
Gertler, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

                        /s/ Andrew Gertler
                        -----------------------------------
                        Andrew Gertler
                        Principal Executive Officer and
                        Principal Financial Officer
                        March 30, 2006
#### § 402.190 Officials who may deny a request for records under FOIA.

Only the Deputy Executive Director for the Office of Public Disclosure, Office of the General Counsel, SSA, or her or his designee is authorized to deny a written request to obtain, inspect, or copy any social security record.

[62 FR 4154, Jan. 29, 1997, as amended at 68 FR 60295, Oct. 22, 2003]
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

DAY ELEV

 580.14

 582.04

 581.99

 582.02

 582.23

 582.36

 582.06

 583.66

 583.59

 583.14

 582.74

 583.74

 584.89

 584.65

 584.47

 585.10

 585.47

 584.95

 585.89

 585.61

 585.02

 584.41

 583.20

 582.40

 581.63

 581.62

 583.76

 583.50

 19,605

 20,710

 20,680

 20,698

 20,823

 20,901

 20,722

 21,684

 21,641

 21,368

 21,128

 21,732

 22,439

 22,291

 22,180

 22,570

 22,802

 22,476

 23,066

 22,890

 22,520

 22,143

 21,404

 20,925

 20,469

 20,463

 21,744

 21,587

STORAGE

-224

+1,105

-30

+18

+125

+78

-179

+962

-43

-273

-240

+604

+707

-148

-111

+390

+232

-326

+590

-176

-370

-377

-739

-479

-456

-6

+1,281

-157

CHANGE

14,895

15,910

26,526

30,018

29,900

29,617

25,634

22,143

18,364

16,875

14,583

12,896

11,423

9,552

7,961

7,093

6,891

6,581

6,316

6,049

5,937

5,878

5,517

5,638

5,668

5,897

10,369

14,744

INFLOW

 15,006

 15,352

 14,215

 13,686

 13,642

 13,645

 14,163

 14,248

 14,711

 14,583

 14,590

 12,503

 10,980

 9,539

 7,929

 6,810

 6,688

 6,659

 5,933

 6,051

 6,037

 5,981

 5,802

 5,792

 5,811

 5,813

 9,637

 14,735

POWER

 0

 0

 12,326

 16,322

 16,194

 15,930

 11,522

 7,324

 3,586

 2,341

 26

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

SPILL

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 38

 85

 85

 85

 85

 85

 85

 85

 85

 85

 85

 85

 85

 85

 85

 85

 85

 85

 85

 85

 85

 85

FISHTRAP

 2

 1

 0

 1

 1

 3

 1

 1

 4

 4

 3

 3

 2

 3

 3

 1

 1

 1

 1

 2

 2

 2

 3

 2

 2

 2

 1

 3

C.F.S.

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

FEBRUARY 2006 KESWICK RESERVOIR DAILY OPERATIONS RUN DATE: July 17, 2006

RES.

EVAP

C.F.S.

COMPUTED*

ACRE-FEET

RELEASE - C.F.S. 

TOTALS +1,758 378,875 290,541 85,571 1,823 55

ACRE-FEET +1,758 751,499 576,288 169,730 3,616 109

SUMMARY

RELEASE (ACRE-FEET)

POWER 576,288

SPILL 169,730

 19,829

FISH TRAP 3,616

SPRING

CR. P. P.

RELEASE (1)

 3,588

 2,639

 1,406

 1,523

 1,553

 728

 1,198

 765

 3,923

 3,339

 4,082

 4,099

 3,873

 3,437

 4,028

 3,461

 3,513

 3,509

 3,507

 3,499

 3,524

 3,343

 3,226

 3,098

 3,397

 3,444

 3,857

 4,113

 85,672

 169,930

*COMPUTED INFLOW IS SUM OF CHANGE IN STORAGE, RELEASES, AND EVAPORATION.

SHASTA

RELEASE

C.F.S

 9,641

 11,507

 22,736

 28,524

 28,448

 28,856

 24,137

 21,048

 14,226

 13,688

 10,482

 8,733

 7,516

 5,803

 3,587

 3,238

 2,905

 2,597

 2,346

 2,148

 2,140

 2,223

 2,020

 2,175

 2,044

 2,155

 5,373

 9,541

 279,837

 555,057

Table 8
EXHIBIT 21

                       Subsidiaries of Registrant




                                                Jurisdiction
                                                     of
Name of Subsidiary                             Incorporation


Prime Leasing, Inc.
  d/b/a's: Americom Financial, Inc.               Illinois

ITC Leasing Co. Prime Equities, Ltd.              Illinois

Americom Resources, Inc.
  (formerly Interstate Telecommunications
   Corporation)                                   Illinois

Prime Finance Corp. 1993-A                        Illinois

Prime Finance Corp. 1994-A                        Illinois

Prime Finance Corp. 1995-A                        Illinois

Prime Finance Corp. 1996-A                        Illinois

Prime Finance Corp. 1997-A                        Illinois

Prime Finance Corp. 1997-B                        Illinois

Prime Finance Corp. 1998-A-1                      Illinois

Prime Finance Corp. 1998-A-2                      Illinois

Prime Healthcare, Inc.                            Illinois

Capital Alliance Corporation                      Illinois
  f/k/a Financial Alliance Corporation

Prime Receivables Finance Corporation I           Illinois

Prime Receivables Finance Corporation II          Illinois
### subpart 4—general provisions
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In
connection with the Annual Report of Tennessee Commerce Bancorp, Inc. (the "Corporation") on Form 10-K for the period ended December 31, 2010, as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Frank Perez, Chief Financial Officer of the Corporation, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



/s/ FRANK PEREZ Frank Perez
Chief Financial Officer
Tennessee Commerce Bancorp, Inc.
March 31, 2011


---



QuickLinks
§ 9.73 Martha's Vineyard. ( a ) *Name.* The name of the viticultural area described in this section is “Martha's Vineyard.”
( b ) *Approved maps.* The approved map for determining the boundary of the Martha's Vineyard viticultural area is the U.S.G.S. map, “Providence, R.I.; Mass.; Conn.; N.Y.;” scaled 1:250,000, edition of 1947 revised 1969.
( c ) *Boundaries.* The Martha's Vineyard viticultural area is located entirely within Dukes County, Massachusetts. The boundary of the Martha's Vineyard viticultural area is the shoreline of the islands named “Martha's Vineyard” and “Chappaquiddic Island” on the “Providence” U.S.G.S. map, and the viticultural area comprises the entire area of the islands.
[T.D. ATF-193, 50 FR 256, Jan. 3, 1985]
I 

114TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 3937 

To designate the building utilized as a United States courthouse located 

at 150 Reade Circle in Greenville, North Carolina, as the ‘‘Judge Randy 

D. Doub United States Courthouse’’. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

NOVEMBER 5, 2015 

Mr. BUTTERFIELD (for himself, Mrs. ELLMERS of North Carolina, Mr. 

JONES, Mr. PRICE of North Carolina, Ms. FOXX, Mr. WALKER, Mr. 

ROUZER, Mr. HUDSON, Mr. PITTENGER, Mr. MCHENRY, Mr. MEADOWS, 

Ms. ADAMS, and Mr. HOLDING) introduced the following bill; which was 

referred to the Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure 

A BILL 

To designate the building utilized as a United States courthouse located at 150 Reade Circle in Greenville, North 

Carolina, as the ‘‘Judge Randy D. Doub United States 

Courthouse’’. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. DESIGNATION. 

4 The building utilized as a United States courthouse 

5 located at 150 Reade Circle in Greenville, North Carolina, 

6 shall be known and designated as the ‘‘Judge Randy D. 

7 Doub United States Courthouse’’ during the period in 


emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 3937 IH

1 which the building is utilized as a United States court2 house. 

3 SEC. 2. REFERENCES. 

4 With respect to the period in which the building re5 ferred to in section 1 is utilized as a United States court6 house, any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, 

7 paper, or other record of the United States to that build8 ing shall be deemed to be a reference to the ‘‘Judge Randy 

9 D. Doub United States Courthouse’’. 

Æ 


emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with BILLS
Electrical Conductivity, UMHOS

Day High Low Mean

1 819 183 344

2 472 180 254

3 743 180 299

4 2,689 180 632

5 1,072 182 407

6 491 183 279

7 419 186 264

8 469 188 269

9 739 193 326

10 1,184 197 403

11 1,526 199 480

12 2,560 204 675

13 3,266 203 763

14 1,104 201 405

15 471 200 294

16 616 197 325

17 1,440 201 551

18 3,191 217 1,165

19 4,470 253 1,643

20 3,210 223 970

21 1,450 224 512

22 2,240 216 862

23 4,433 216 1,161

24 1,934 209 598

25 1,732 155 525

26 1,402 203 443

27 690 203 302

28 464 201 259

29 434 198 245

30 279 194 223

COMMENT(S): 0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

Historical Archive and Report Database

Port Chicago Top In Suisun Bay 

Run Date: 5/2/2024

April 2024
**Exhibit 32**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002In connection with the Annual Report of Orchids Paper Products Company (the “Company”) on Form 10-Kfor the fiscal year ending December 31, 2006 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commissionon the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Michael P. Sage, Chief Executive Officer and President of theCompany, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and result of operations of the Company.   /s/ Michael P. Sage Michael P. Sage  Chief Executive Officer and President  March 19, 2007  CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002In connection with the Annual Report of Orchids Paper Products Company (the “Company”) on Form 10-Kfor the fiscal year ending December 31, 2006 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commissionon the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Keith R. Schroeder, Chief Financial Officer of the Company,certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Actof 2002, that to my knowledge:     (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and     (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and result of operations of the Company.   /s/ Keith R. Schroeder   Keith R. Schroeder  Chief Financial Officer  March 19, 2007
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY ELEV

 221.16

 221.11

 220.75

 221.18

 221.35

 221.05

 221.02

 220.91

 220.72

 219.70

 219.73

 220.34

 220.00

 220.57

 221.04

 221.30

 222.05

 221.97

 222.00

 220.87

 221.04

 222.16

 222.54

 222.30

 221.79

 222.06

 222.87

 223.60

 223.72

 222.86

 223.05

 46,180

 46,049

 45,106

 46,233

 46,679

 45,892

 45,813

 45,525

 45,027

 42,376

 42,454

 44,036

 43,152

 44,635

 45,865

 46,547

 48,517

 48,308

 48,385

 45,420

 45,865

 48,810

 49,820

 49,182

 47,835

 48,544

 50,699

 52,652

 52,974

 50,673

 51,180

STORAGE

+2,665

-131

-943

+1,127

+446

-787

-79

-288

-498

-2,651

+78

+1,582

-884

+1,483

+1,230

+682

+1,970

-209

+77

-2,965

+445

+2,945

+1,010

-638

-1,347

+709

+2,155

+1,953

+322

-2,301

+507

CHANGE

90

0

0

198

144

146

125

134

117

114

176

209

209

247

263

213

381

465

517

522

543

1,081

1,529

1,365

2,202

2,473

2,316

2,603

2,581

2,469

2,473

PUMPING

 1,250

 1,042

 1,149

 1,042

 1,042

 1,146

 1,570

 1,055

 1,063

 1,146

 833

 1,250

 1,562

 1,354

 833

 833

 833

 833

 833

 810

 646

 585

 499

 678

 688

 451

 460

 428

 52

 0

 0

PUMPING

 0

 67

 66

 66

 0

 0

 68

 68

 88

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 1,671

 0

 557

 3,549

 4,970

 5,478

 4,686

 4,995

 4,969

 6,519

 7,281

 5,197

PUMPING

 0

 380

 458

 522

 543

 527

 506

 575

 626

 537

 582

 516

 473

 489

 454

 436

 126

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

GEN.

*

+104

+287

+62

+215

+124

+18

+25

+223

+15

+59

+124

+82

+83

+233

+14

+58

+19

+140

+19

+27

-84

+10

+160

+225

+169

+75

+140

+142

+249

+214

+37

OR

UNITED STATES 

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION

CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT

CONSOLIDATED STATE-FEDERAL O'NEILL FOREBAY January 1, 2016

DAILY OPERATIONS

DECEMBER 2015 RUN DATE:

IN LAKE GEN.

ACRE-FEET O'NEILL

RELEASE - C.F.S. 

TOTALS +7,665 25,905 7,750 50,295 25,966 +3,268

ACRE-FEET +7,665 51,383 15,372 99,760 51,504

SUMMARY

 0

RELEASE (ACRE-FEET)

O'NEILL GEN. 15,372

SAN LUIS PUMP 99,760 0

 43,515

DOS AMIGOS PUMP 51,504

DELIVERIES 

S. LUIS O'NEILL

 2,400

 1,136

 1,136

 1,785

 1,541

 947

 1,716

 1,006

 1,302

 0

 927

 2,082

 1,298

 2,111

 1,400

 1,225

 1,391

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 23,403

 46,420

CALIF. DOS AMIGOS

AQUEDUCT

0

0

0

0

0

166

238

190

91

173

228

191

0

0

230

117

161

124

337

438

411

1,535

2,869

3,737

3,116

2,946

4,086

3,637

3,904

3,438

2,942

 35,305

 70,027

S. LUIS

DELIV.

GAINS(+)

LOSS(-)

C.F.S.

INFLOW - C.F.S

STATE OF CALIFORNIA

THE RESOURCES AGENCY

DEPARTMENT OF WATER RESOURCES

STATE WATER PROJECT

TOTAL 166,636

 6,482

* DAILY DEL. FIGURES UNAVAILABLE. TOT. DEL. IS INCLUDED IN COMPUTING MONTHLY TOTALS
#### § 10.416 How does a change in the number of beneficiaries affect the amount of compensation paid to the other beneficiaries?

If compensation to a beneficiary is terminated, the amount of compensation payable to one or more of the remaining beneficiaries may be reapportioned. Similarly, the birth of a posthumous child may result in a reapportionment of the amount of compensation payable to other beneficiaries. The parent, or someone acting on the child's behalf, shall promptly notify OWCP of the birth and submit a copy of the birth certificate.