alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
ICito S 

^^""'% . 

Wisconsin Department of Transportation 

www.dot.wisconsin.gov 

''"oiimw^ 

Jim Doyle 

Governor 

Franl< J. Busalacchi 

Secretary 

JUN 1 8 2009 

Office o GeneiaLCouuseL 

4802 Shi boygan AAKPWJiii/EtnseiNMENTAL 

P.O. Bo) m o LAW, AGC-6Q0 

IWadison w i w/uz-zaiu 

June 12,2009 

,^nic e of the Chief Counsel 

Attn: FAA Part 16 Airport Proceedings Docket AGC-610 

Federal Aviation Administration 

800 Independence Ave., SW 

Washington, DC 20591 

Mr. Kent S. Jackson 

21628 Midland Drive / 

Shawnee, KS 66218 ^_,-- ^ 

RE: Sterling Aviation, LLC V. Milwaukee County, Wisconsin 

Request for Removal from Service List 

Dear Sir or Madam: 

Telephone: 608-266-8810 

FAX: 608-267-6734 

E-mail: ogc.exec@dot.state.wi.us 

I recently received the Part 16 Complaint in regards to Sterling Aviation, LLC v. Milwaukee Counf^ 

Wisconsin. The Department has no interest in the alleged activities and requests that it be^removetfifrom 

the service list. 

As noted in the complaint, Milwaukee County is the owner, operator and sponsor of the General Mitchell 

International Airport. As such, they are responsible for establishing the Minimum Standards applicable 

to the airport and regulating fueling provisions in leases. The Department has no control over these 

activities and the complaint contains no allegations of Department violations of Part 16. I note that 14 

C.F.R. Part 16.23(b) requires that, with respect to each person who is the subject of the complaint, the 

complaint states specific provisions of each Act that the complainant believes were violated and a 

complete statement of the facts relied upon to substantiate each allegation. The Department was not 

responsible for any of the alleged actions upon which the complaint is based and is not mentioned in the 

body of the complaint. Therefore, the Department requests removal from the service list. 

Sio6erely, 

lames S. Thiel, Counsel 

Wisconsin Department of Transportation 

State Bar #1012582 

cc: William J. Domina, Milwaukee County Corporation Counsel 

C. Barry Bateman, Manager, General Mitchell International Airport 

Scott P. Lewis, Anderson & Kreiger, LLP 

D0T3 2003
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Orange County Milk Association, Appellant.

Judgment affirmed, with costs. No opinion. Present—Ingraham, P. J., McLaughlin, Laughlin, Scott and Dowling, JJ.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY HIGH

 602

 789

 814

 795

 761

 763

 757

 774

 782

 762

 792

 804

 814

 814

 819

 832

 841

 830

 839

 827

 827

 816

 837

 865

 869

 853

 836

 852

 850

 840

 856

 477

 508

 566

 552

 542

 545

 510

 519

 507

 496

 475

 471

 456

 461

 461

 480

 485

 501

 488

 498

 498

 494

 490

 503

 468

 471

 473

 485

 508

 516

 563

 511

 604

 630

 636

 612

 623

 615

 617

 623

 603

 597

 601

 586

 593

 604

 619

 630

 641

 647

 639

 643

 634

 613

 618

 619

 623

 621

 627

 641

 644

 664

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

DECEMBER 2000 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: January 16, 2001

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

DELTA MENDOTA CANAL AT CHECK 13 (O'NEILL)
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY HIGH

 14,905

 13,992

 14,846

 14,442

 13,251

 12,068

 11,826

 10,904

 12,829

 10,677

 13,298

 13,644

 15,092

 13,990

 14,702

 14,375

 15,110

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 17,386

 18,173

 16,884

 16,966

 16,197

 17,130

 15,289

 14,737

 4,216

 4,258

 4,754

 5,970

 4,300

 4,103

 3,233

 3,153

 3,256

 2,425

 2,711

 4,206

 4,530

 4,556

 5,546

 5,486

 6,103

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 5,223

 5,328

 5,461

 7,169

 7,065

 7,391

 6,467

 6,979

 9,276

 9,284

 9,663

 10,205

 8,751

 7,654

 6,783

 6,960

 8,003

 7,560

 8,158

 9,180

 10,664

 10,202

 10,426

 10,547

 10,889

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 10,935

 11,540

 11,741

 12,572

 12,674

 12,676

 11,777

 11,183

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

MARCH 2022 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: April 4, 2022

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

PORT CHICAGO TOP IN SUISUN BAY
§ 404.1539 How we consider whether treatment is available. Our determination about whether treatment is available to you for your drug addiction or your alcoholism will depend upon— ( a ) The capacity of an approved institution or facility to admit you for appropriate treatment;
( b ) The location of the approved institution or facility, or the place where treatment, services or resources could be provided to you;
( c ) The availability and cost of transportation for you to the place of treatment;
( d ) Your general health, including your ability to travel and capacity to understand and follow the prescribed treatment;
( e ) Your particular condition and circumstances; and
( f ) The treatment that is prescribed for your drug addiction or alcoholism.
[60 FR 8148, Feb. 10, 1995]
### §360fff–1. Submission of requests

Any person may submit a request to the Secretary for a determination of whether a nonprescription sunscreen active ingredient or a combination of nonprescription sunscreen active ingredients, for use under specified conditions, to be prescribed, recommended, or suggested in the labeling thereof (including dosage form, dosage strength, and route of administration) is GRASE and should be included in part 352 of title 21, Code of Federal Regulations (or any successor regulations) concerning nonprescription sunscreen.

(June 25, 1938, ch. 675, §586A, as added Pub. L. 113–195, §2(a), Nov. 26, 2014, 128 Stat. 2036.)
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY HIGH

 7,592

 7,409

 9,619

 6,692

 8,031

 8,716

 9,234

 7,776

 7,341

 5,879

 4,262

 5,413

 5,059

 6,484

 8,185

 10,393

 9,422

 9,873

 13,086

 12,640

 11,016

 10,615

 9,754

 7,494

 6,818

 14,782

 15,717

 16,713

 21,193

 19,510

 18,425

 603

 611

 635

 576

 760

 796

 764

 779

 761

 740

 680

 816

 1,256

 1,697

 2,806

 2,668

 2,683

 2,084

 2,593

 2,160

 2,252

 2,409

 1,969

 2,129

 2,364

 1,948

 6,525

 6,622

 5,818

 5,556

 5,597

 3,217

 3,537

 3,765

 3,086

 3,745

 3,995

 4,070

 3,595

 3,275

 2,894

 2,410

 2,299

 2,691

 3,714

 4,456

 4,985

 5,377

 5,607

 6,893

 6,192

 5,720

 5,422

 4,777

 4,710

 4,587

 6,776

 10,703

 10,431

 11,426

 11,666

 11,758

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

JULY 2005 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: August 2, 2005

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

PORT CHICAGO TOP IN SUISUN BAY
FORM 6-K
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
Report of Foreign Private Issuer
Pursuant to Rule 13a-16 or 15d-16
under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 For the month of July 2011 Commission File Number 0-29620 LJ International Inc.(Translation of registrant's name into
English)Unit #12, 12/F, Block A
Focal Industrial Centre21 Man Lok Street, Hung Hom, Hong Kong
            (Address of principal executive office) Indicate by check mark whether the registrant files or will file annual reports under cover of Form 20-F or Form 40-F. Form 20-F ü Form 40-F  Indicate by check mark if the registrant is submitting the Form 6-K in paper as permitted by Regulation S-T Rule 101(b)(1): ____  Note: Regulation S-T Rule 101(b)(1) only permits the submission in paper of a Form 6-K if submitted solely to provide an attached annual report to security holders.  Indicate by check mark if the registrant is submitting the Form 6-K in paper as permitted by Regulation S-T Rule 101(b)(7): ____  Note: Regulation S-T Rule 101(b)(7) only permits the
submission in paper of a Form 6-K if submitted to furnish a report or
other document that the registrant foreign private issuer must furnish
and make public under the laws of the jurisdiction in which the registrant
is incorporated, domiciled or legally organized (the registrant's
"home country"), or under the rules of the home country exchange on which
the registrant's securities are traded, as long as the report or other
document is not a press release, is not required to be and has not been
distributed to the registrant's security holders, and, if discussing a
material event, has already been the subject of a Form 6-K submission or
other Commission filing on EDGAR.  Indicate by check mark whether the registrant by furnishing the information contained in this Form is also thereby furnishing the
information to the Commission pursuant to Rule 12g3-2(b) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. Yes      No
ü If "Yes" is marked, indicate below the file number assigned to the registrant in connection with Rule 12g3-2(b): 82- ________




---



##### 



Signatures Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized. LJ International Inc.
(Registrant)Date: July 7, 2011
    
    By:
    
    /s/ NG HON TAK RINGONG HON TAK RINGO
Chief Financial Officer




---



##### 



EXHIBIT INDEX
 Exhibit No.
    
    Description of Exhibit99.1
    
    Press Release.
---

Exhibit 99.16

March 31, 2017

CONSENT OF STELLA SEARSTON

United States Securities and Exchange Commission

In connection with Silver Wheaton Corp.s (the Company)
Annual Report on Form 40-F for the year ended December 31, 2016 (the Annual
Report), I, Stella Searston, hereby consent to the inclusion in, or
incorporation by reference into, the Annual Report and the Companys
Registration Statement on Form S-8 (File No. 333-128128), Form F-10 (File No.
333-203682) and Form F-3D (File No. 333-194702), of the following:

| | 1. | Salobo Operations, Para State, Brazil, NI 43-101
      Technical Report that has an effective date of 31 December,
  2015.
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Yours truly,

|/s/ Stella
      Searston | 
|------------------------- | 
|Stella Searston, RM SME   | 

---
(No. 73-CC-377

#### Burdett Oxygen Company, Claimant, *vs.*State of Illinois, Department of Transportation, Respondent.

*Opinion filed April 25, 1974.*

Burdett Oxygen Co., Claimant, pro se.

William J. Scott, Attorney General; Douglas G. Olson, Assistant Attorney General, for Respondent.

*379Per Curiam.
EXHIBIT 31.1 - SECTION 302 CERTIFICATION



                                  CERTIFICATION



I, Kenneth McCullum, certify that:


1.       I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K, and all reports on
         Form 8-K containing distribution or servicing reports filed in respect
         of the periods included in the year covered by this annual report of
         Hartford Life Global Funding Trust 2005-049;

2.       Based on my knowledge, the information in these reports, taken as a
         whole, does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit
         to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in
         light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not
         misleading as of the last day of the period covered by this annual
         report;

3.       Based on my knowledge, the distribution or servicing information
         required to be provided to the depositor by the trustee under the
         pooling and servicing, or similar agreement, for inclusion in these
         reports is included in these reports;

4.       I am responsible for reviewing the activities performed by the
         depositor and the trustee under the pooling and servicing, or similar
         agreement, and based upon my knowledge and the annual compliance review
         required under that agreement, and except as disclosed in the reports,
         the depositor and trustee have each fulfilled its obligations under
         that agreement; and

5.       The reports disclose all significant deficiencies relating to the
         trustee's or depositor's compliance with the minimum servicing or
         similar standards based upon the report provided by an independent
         public accountant, after conducting a review in compliance with the
         Uniform Single Attestation Program for Mortgage Bankers or similar
         procedure, as set forth in the pooling and servicing, or similar
         agreements, that is included in these reports.

In giving the certifications above, I have reasonably relied on information
provided to me by the following unaffiliated parties:

                  JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. and its officers and agents



Date: August 9, 2005

/s/ Kenneth McCullum

Kenneth McCullum
Vice President & Actuary
Hartford Life Insurance Company, as depositor
#### § 320.1 Introduction.

This part explains which units of the Board are authorized to make initial determinations with respect to entitlement to benefits under the Railroad Unemployment Insurance Act and waiver of recovery of overpayments under that Act. This part explains how notice of such determinations is to be communicated to the claimant and to his or her base-year employer(s) and how these determinations may be appealed.

[56 FR 65679, Dec. 18, 1991]
### §§5021 to 5023. Repealed. Pub. L. 103–382, title III, §391(i), Oct. 20, 1994, 108 Stat. 4023

Section 5021, Pub. L. 100–418, title VI, §6027, Aug. 23, 1988, 102 Stat. 1478, authorized Presidential Awards for Teaching Excellence in Foreign Languages.

Section 5022, Pub. L. 100–418, title VI, §6028, Aug. 23, 1988, 102 Stat. 1479, contained administrative provisions.

Section 5023, Pub. L. 100–418, title VI, §6029, Aug. 23, 1988, 102 Stat. 1479, authorized appropriations.
§ 336.11 Exhaustion of rights to normal unemployment benefits. For the purposes of this part, the Board considers that an employee has exhausted his or her current rights to normal benefits for days of unemployment if: ( a ) The employee received unemployment benefits for 130 days of unemployment in the benefit year; or
( b ) The employee received unemployment benefits in the benefit year equal to the amount of his or her base year compensation; or
( c ) At the end of a normal benefit year during which the employee was qualified for benefits, he or she received less than the maximum unemployment benefits for the benefit year and he or she is not qualified for benefits in the next succeeding benefit year.
Editorial Note on Part 40
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 40 appear by T.D. ATF-460, 66 FR 39094-39096, July 27, 2001; T.D. ATF-464, 66 FR 43479, Aug. 20, 2001; and T.D. TTB-91, 76 FR 5479, Feb. 1, 2011.

§ 40.232 Experimental purposes. A manufacturer of tobacco products may use tobacco products for experimental purposes without determination and payment of tax as set forth in this section. ( a ) *What are experimental purposes?* Experimental purposes are operations or tests carried out under controlled conditions to discover an unknown scientific principle or fact, to gather or confirm data about a known scientific principle or fact, or to test manufacturing, packaging, or other such equipment. Examples of uses for experimental purposes are: ( 1 ) Use by manufacturers to determine scientific facts relating to tobacco products, such as their chemical content;
( 2 ) Use by producers of packaging machines to test the operation of such machines; and
( 3 ) Use by laboratories, hospitals, medical centers, institutes, colleges, or universities, for scientific, technical, or medical research.
( b ) *What purposes are not experimental?* The uses of tobacco products outside the factory premises for advertising or consumer testing or as salespersons' or customers' samples are not experimental purposes.
( c ) *Use in factory.* A manufacturer of tobacco products may use tobacco products without determination and payment of tax for experimental purposes in a factory.
( d ) *Use outside factory.* A manufacturer may remove tobacco products in bond for experimental purposes outside a factory. When tobacco products are shipped for experimental purposes outside the factory, the proprietor of the factory remains liable for the taxes imposed by 26 U.S.C. 5701 until the occurrence of one of the following events: ( 1 ) The tobacco products are returned to the premises of the factory from which they were shipped; or
( 2 ) The tobacco products are destroyed during or after their use for experimental purposes.
( e ) *Record of use.* In addition to the records prescribed by § 40.183, a manufacturer who removes tobacco products in bond for experimental purposes outside a factory must prepare and maintain a record containing the following information: ( 1 ) Name and address of the consignee;
( 2 ) Kind and quantity of tobacco products removed;
( 3 ) Description of packaging, if any, of the tobacco products removed;
( 4 ) Description of how and when the consignee will use the tobacco products; and
( 5 ) Disposition of any remaining tobacco products after the consignee's use.
(Approved by the Office of Management and Budget under Control Number 1512-0562) (72 Stat. 1418, as amended; 26 U.S.C. 5704)
[T.D. ATF-478, 67 FR 19333, Apr. 19, 2002]
### §676. Violations

#### (a) Misdemeanors; felonies: intent to defraud and distribution of adulterated articles; good faith

Any person, firm, or corporation who violates any provision of this chapter for which no other criminal penalty is provided by this chapter shall upon conviction be subject to imprisonment for not more than one year, or a fine of not more than $1,000, or both such imprisonment and fine; but if such violation involves intent to defraud, or any distribution or attempted distribution of an article that is adulterated (except as defined in section 601(m)(8) of this title), such person, firm, or corporation shall be subject to imprisonment for not more than three years or a fine of not more than $10,000, or both: Provided, That no person, firm, or corporation, shall be subject to penalties under this section for receiving for transportation any article or animal in violation of this chapter if such receipt was made in good faith, unless such person, firm, or corporation refuses to furnish on request of a representative of the Secretary the name and address of the person from whom he received such article or animal, and copies of all documents, if any there be, pertaining to the delivery of the article or animal to him.

#### (b) Minor violations; written notice of warning of criminal and civil proceedings

Nothing in this chapter shall be construed as requiring the Secretary to report for prosecution or for the institution of libel or injunction proceedings, minor violations of this chapter whenever he believes that the public interest will be adequately served by a suitable written notice of warning.

(Mar. 4, 1907, ch. 2907, title IV, §406, as added Pub. L. 90–201, §16, Dec. 15, 1967, 81 Stat. 599; amended Pub. L. 99–641, title IV, §403(c), Nov. 10, 1986, 100 Stat. 3570.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

1986—Subsec. (b). Pub. L. 99–641, §403(c)(1), temporarily inserted provisions which related to factors required to be considered by Secretary in determining whether public interest is served by written notice of warning. See Effective and Termination Dates of 1986 Amendment note below.

Subsec. (c). Pub. L. 99–641, §403(c)(2), temporarily added subsec. (c). See Effective and Termination Dates of 1986 Amendment note below.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective and Termination Dates of 1986 Amendment

Pub. L. 99–641, title IV, §403(c), Nov. 10, 1986, 100 Stat. 3570, provided that the amendment made by that section is effective only during the 6-year period beginning Nov. 10, 1986.

#### Construction and Effect of Amendments by Pub. L. 99–641

For provisions relating to construction and effect of temporary amendments by section 403 of Pub. L. 99–641, see sections 403(e) and 404 of Pub. L. 99–641, set out as notes entitled "Inspection Services for Establishments Not Participating in Total Plant Quality-Control Program" and "Savings Provision", respectively, under section 609 of this title.
### SUBCHAPTER III—INSTITUTIONAL AID

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Title III of the Higher Education Act of 1965, comprising this subchapter, was originally enacted by Pub. L. 89–329, title III, Nov. 8, 1965, 79 Stat. 1229, and amended by Pub. L. 89–752, Nov. 3, 1966, 80 Stat. 1240; Pub. L. 90–575, Oct. 16, 1968, 82 Stat. 1014; Pub. L. 91–230, Apr. 13, 1970, 84 Stat. 121; Pub. L. 92–318, June 23, 1972, 86 Stat. 235; Pub. L. 93–380, Aug. 21, 1974, 88 Stat. 484; Pub. L. 94–482, Oct. 12, 1976, 90 Stat. 2081; Pub. L. 96–49, Aug. 13, 1979, 93 Stat. 351; Pub. L. 96–374, Oct. 3, 1980, 94 Stat. 1367; Pub. L. 97–35, Aug. 13, 1981, 95 Stat. 357; Pub. L. 98–95, Sept. 26, 1983, 97 Stat. 708; Pub. L. 98–312, June 12, 1984, 98 Stat. 233. Such title is shown herein, however, as having been added by Pub. L. 99–498, title III, §301(a), Oct. 17, 1986, 100 Stat. 1290, without reference to such intervening amendments because of the extensive revision of title III by Pub. L. 99–498.
Exhibit 99.14









CONSENT OF R. DIDUR





I hereby consent to the use of my name in connection with the following documents and report, which are being filed as exhibits to and incorporated by reference into the registration statement on Form 40-F of Silver Wheaton Corp. (the Company) being filed with the United States Securities and Exchange Commission:





1.

The technical report dated March 28, 2008, entitled A Technical Review on the Yauliyacu Lead/Zinc Mine, Junin Province, Perú for Silver Wheaton Corp. (the Yauliyacu Report); and



2.

The annual information form of the Company dated March 28, 2008, which includes reference to my name in connection with information relating to the Yauliyacu Mine and the Yauliyacu Report and the properties described therein.







Date: March 28, 2008

| |  |                                                                                                                                                                      
| |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| |  | /s/ Robert Didur, P. Eng
_____________________________________
Name: Robert Didur, P. Eng
Title: Senior Associate Mining Consultant,
Watts Griffis and McOuat Limited
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Sabino MONTES-ALVARADO, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 05-51322

Conference Calendar.

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.

July 13, 2006.

Joseph H. Gay, Jr, Assistant U.S. Attorney, U.S. Attorney’s Office, Western District of Texas, San Antonio, TX, for Plaintiff-Appellee.

Donna F. Coltharp, Federal Public Defender’s Office, Western District of Texas, San Antonio, TX, for Defendant-Appellant.

Before DAVIS, BARKSDALE, and DeMOSS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: *

Appealing the Judgment in a Criminal Case, Sabino Montes-Alvarado raises arguments that are foreclosed by *Almendarez-Torres v. United States,*523 U.S. 224, 235, 118 S.Ct. 1219, 140 L.Ed.2d 350 (1998), which held that 8 U.S.C. § 1326(b)(2) is a penalty provision and not a separate criminal offense. The Government’s motion for summary affirmance is *384GRANTED, and the judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.

*

 Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.