21408 Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 73 / Friday, April 15, 2011 / Notices 

• Minimize the burden of the 

collection of information on those who 

are to respond, including through the 

use of appropriate automated, 

electronic, mechanical, or other 

technological collection techniques or 

other forms of information technology, 

e.g., permitting electronic submission of 

responses. 

Agency: Bureau of Labor Statistics 

(BLS). 

Title of Collection: Current Population 

Survey—Basic Labor Force. 

OMB Control Number: 1220–0100. 

Affected Public: Individuals or 

Households. 

Total Estimated Number of 

Respondents: 55,000. 

Total Estimated Number of 

Responses: 660,000. 

Total Estimated Annual Burden 

Hours: 82,500. 

Total Estimated Annual Costs Burden: 

$0. 

Dated: April 11, 2011. 

Michel Smyth, 

Departmental Clearance Officer. 

[FR Doc. 2011–9169 Filed 4–14–11; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4510–24–P 

DEPARTMENT OF LABOR 

Employment and Training 

Administration 

Notice of Determinations Regarding 

Eligibility To Apply for Worker 

Adjustment Assistance 

In accordance with Section 223 of the 

Trade Act of 1974, as amended (19 

U.S.C. 2273) the Department of Labor 

herein presents summaries of 

determinations regarding eligibility to 

apply for trade adjustment assistance for 

workers by (TA–W) number issued 

during the period of March 28, 2011 

through April 1, 2011. 

In order for an affirmative 

determination to be made for workers of 

a primary firm and a certification issued 

regarding eligibility to apply for worker 

adjustment assistance, each of the group 

eligibility requirements of Section 

222(a) of the Act must be met. 

I. Under Section 222(a)(2)(A), the 

following must be satisfied: 

(1) A significant number or proportion 

of the workers in such workers’ firm 

have become totally or partially 

separated, or are threatened to become 

totally or partially separated; 

(2) The sales or production, or both, 

of such firm have decreased absolutely; 

and 

(3) One of the following must be 

satisfied: 

(A) Imports of articles or services like 

or directly competitive with articles 

produced or services supplied by such 

firm have increased; 

(B) Imports of articles like or directly 

competitive with articles into which one 

or more component parts produced by 

such firm are directly incorporated, 

have increased; 

(C) Imports of articles directly 

incorporating one or more component 

parts produced outside the United 

States that are like or directly 

competitive with imports of articles 

incorporating one or more component 

parts produced by such firm have 

increased; 

(D) Imports of articles like or directly 

competitive with articles which are 

produced directly using services 

supplied by such firm, have increased; 

and 

(4) The increase in imports 

contributed importantly to such 

workers’ separation or threat of 

separation and to the decline in the 

sales or production of such firm; or 

II. Section 222(a)(2)(B) all of the 

following must be satisfied: 

(1) A significant number or proportion 

of the workers in such workers’ firm 

have become totally or partially 

separated, or are threatened to become 

totally or partially separated; 

(2) One of the following must be 

satisfied: 

(A) There has been a shift by the 

workers’ firm to a foreign country in the 

production of articles or supply of 

services like or directly competitive 

with those produced/supplied by the 

workers’ firm; 

(B) There has been an acquisition 

from a foreign country by the workers’ 

firm of articles/services that are like or 

directly competitive with those 

produced/supplied by the workers’ firm; 

and 

(3) The shift/acquisition contributed 

importantly to the workers’ separation 

or threat of separation. 

In order for an affirmative 

determination to be made for adversely 

affected workers in public agencies and 

a certification issued regarding 

eligibility to apply for worker 

adjustment assistance, each of the group 

eligibility requirements of Section 

222(b) of the Act must be met. 

(1) A significant number or proportion 

of the workers in the public agency have 

become totally or partially separated, or 

are threatened to become totally or 

partially separated; 

(2) The public agency has acquired 

from a foreign country services like or 

directly competitive with services 

which are supplied by such agency; and 

(3) The acquisition of services 

contributed importantly to such 

workers’ separation or threat of 

separation. 

In order for an affirmative 

determination to be made for adversely 

affected secondary workers of a firm and 

a certification issued regarding 

eligibility to apply for worker 

adjustment assistance, each of the group 

eligibility requirements of Section 

222(c) of the Act must be met. 

(1) A significant number or proportion 

of the workers in the workers’ firm have 

become totally or partially separated, or 

are threatened to become totally or 

partially separated; 

(2) The workers’ firm is a Supplier or 

Downstream Producer to a firm that 

employed a group of workers who 

received a certification of eligibility 

under Section 222(a) of the Act, and 

such supply or production is related to 

the article or service that was the basis 

for such certification; and 

(3) Either— 

(A) The workers’ firm is a supplier 

and the component parts it supplied to 

the firm described in paragraph (2) 

accounted for at least 20 percent of the 

production or sales of the workers’ firm; 

or 

(B) A loss of business by the workers’ 

firm with the firm described in 

paragraph (2) contributed importantly to 

the workers’ separation or threat of 

separation. 

In order for an affirmative 

determination to be made for adversely 

affected workers in firms identified by 

the International Trade Commission and 

a certification issued regarding 

eligibility to apply for worker 

adjustment assistance, each of the group 

eligibility requirements of Section 222(f) 

of the Act must be met. 

(1) The workers’ firm is publicly 

identified by name by the International 

Trade Commission as a member of a 

domestic industry in an investigation 

resulting in— 

(A) An affirmative determination of 

serious injury or threat thereof under 

section 202(b)(1); 

(B) An affirmative determination of 

market disruption or threat thereof 

under section 421(b)(1); or 

(C) An affirmative final determination 

of material injury or threat thereof under 

section 705(b)(1)(A) or 735(b)(1)(A) of 

the Tariff Act of 1930 (19 U.S.C. 

1671d(b)(1)(A) and 1673d(b)(1)(A)); 

(2) The petition is filed during the 1- 

year period beginning on the date on 

which— 

(A) A summary of the report 

submitted to the President by the 

International Trade Commission under 

section 202(f)(1) with respect to the 

affirmative determination described in 

paragraph (1)(A) is published in the 


srobinson on DSKHWCL6B1PROD with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 73 / Friday, April 15, 2011 / Notices 21409 

Federal Register under section 202(f)(3); 

or 

(B) Notice of an affirmative 

determination described in 

subparagraph (1) is published in the 

Federal Register; and 

(3) The workers have become totally 

or partially separated from the workers’ 

firm within— 

(A) The 1-year period described in 

paragraph (2); or 

(B) Notwithstanding section 223(b)(1), 

the 1-year period preceding the 1-year 

period described in paragraph (2). 

Affirmative Determinations for Worker 

Adjustment Assistance 

The following certifications have been 

issued. The date following the company 

name and location of each 

determination references the impact 

date for all workers of such 

determination. 

The following certifications have been 

issued. The requirements of Section 

222(a)(2)(A) (increased imports) of the 

Trade Act have been met. 

TA–W No. Subject firm Location Impact date 

74,817 ............... Kidde-Fenwal, UTC Fire and Security, Davis, Account Temps, Kelly, 

John, Winter.

Ashland, MA ................ November 1, 2009. 

74,955 ............... Canal Sportswear, Inc. ................................................................................. New York, NY ............. November 22, 2009. 

75,157 ............... Smethport and Lauri Toys, Patch Products, Inc., On-Site Leased Workers 

from Adecco Employment Service.

Smethport, PA ............. January 28, 2010. 

75,208 ............... Apex Industries, Inc., Labor Finders/LF Staffing and Labor Ready ............. Spokane Valley, WA ... February 8, 2010. 

75,209 ............... Raxon Fabrics, Vescom North America, Inc. ............................................... Allentown, PA .............. February 28, 2011. 

The following certifications have been 

issued. The requirements of Section 

222(a)(2)(B) (shift in production or 

services) of the Trade Act have been 

met. 

TA–W No. Subject firm Location Impact date 

74,927 ............... Pfizer, Inc., Pfizer Global Manufacturing, Pfizer Research and Development, etc.Pearl River, NY ........... October 26, 2009. 

75,012 ............... Research In Motion Limited, Former Workers from Dataviz, Inc ................. Milford, CT .................. December 16, 2009. 

75,077 ............... Dama Jewelry Technology, Leased Workers From Vincent Porcaro, Inc. 

and Coworx Staffing Services.

Johnston, RI ................ January 7, 2010. 

75,198 ............... ACS Outsourcing Solutions, Inc., A Xerox Company .................................. Pittsburgh, PA ............. February 8, 2010. 

75,210 ............... PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP, Human Resources Shared Services Center, Talent Acquisition Associates, etc.Tampa, FL ................... February 8, 2010. 

75,258 ............... Kaz, Inc ......................................................................................................... Hudson, NY ................. September 20, 2010. 

75,261 ............... Highmark West Virginia, Inc., Health Plan Operations, Workers Working 

from Their Homes in WV and OH.

Parkersburg, WV ......... February 11, 2010. 

75,288 ............... AT&T Operations, Inc., ABS–GCS Managed Services, GM/GMAC Account, Zerochaos, Allegis Group.Detroit, MI ................... February 11, 2010. 

75,301 ............... Springs Global US, Inc., Grace Complex, Springs Global Participacoes, 

Defender Industries.

Lancaster, SC ............. February 14, 2010. 

75,301A ............ Springs Global US, Inc., Riverlawn Distribution Center, Springs Global 

Participacoes, Defender.

Fort Lawn, SC ............. February 14, 2010. 

Negative Determinations for Worker 

Adjustment Assistance 

In the following cases, the 

investigation revealed that the eligibility 

criteria for worker adjustment assistance 

have not been met for the reasons 

specified. 

The investigation revealed that the 

criterion under paragraph (a)(1), or 

(b)(1), or (c)(1)(employment decline or 

threat of separation) of section 222 has 

not been met. 

TA–W No. Subject firm Location Impact date 

75,199 ............... Dell USA LP, Dell, Inc. Identity and Directory Services—Account Mgt ....... Round Rock, TX. 

75,251 ............... JPMorgan Chase and Company, Treasury and Securities, Core Cash 

Group, Receivable Technology (IT).

Fort Worth, TX. 

The investigation revealed that the 

criteria under paragraphs(a)(2)(A) 

(increased imports) and (a)(2)(B) (shift 

in production or services to a foreign 

country) of section 222 have not been 

met. 

TA–W No. Subject firm Location Impact date 

74,738 ............... Bombardier Mass Transit Corporation, Overhaul Division ........................... Bath, NY. 

74,765 ............... Patriot Antenna Systems, Inc., Cobham PLC .............................................. Albion, MI. 

75,197 ............... Regence Blue Cross Blue Shield of Utah, IT, KForce, Inc., Personnel 

Source, and IBM.

Salt Lake City, UT. 

75,240 ............... International Business Machines (IBM), GTS NA West IMT Region Maintenance and Technical Support.Milwaukee, WI. 


srobinson on DSKHWCL6B1PROD with NOTICES
21410 Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 73 / Friday, April 15, 2011 / Notices 

TA–W No. Subject firm Location Impact date 

75,264 ............... City of Firsts Community Federal Credit Union, South Branch ................... Kokomo, IN. 

I hereby certify that the 

aforementioned determinations were 

issued during the period of March 28, 

2011 through April 1, 2011. Copies of 

these determinations may be requested 

under the Freedom of Information Act. 

Requests may be submitted by fax, 

courier services, or mail to FOIA 

Disclosure Officer, Office of Trade 

Adjustment Assistance (ETA), U.S. 

Department of Labor, 200 Constitution 

Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 20210 or 

tofoiarequest@dol.gov. These 

determinations also are available on the 

Department’s website at http:// 

www.doleta.gov/tradeact under the 

searchable listing of determinations. 

Dated: April 8, 2011. 

Michael W. Jaffe, 

Certifying Officer, Office of Trade Adjustment 

Assistance. 

[FR Doc. 2011–9168 Filed 4–14–11; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE P 

DEPARTMENT OF LABOR 

Mine Safety and Health Administration 

[OMB Control No. 1219–0133] 

Proposed Extension of Existing 

Information Collection; Hazard 

Communication (HazCom) 

AGENCY: Mine Safety and Health 

Administration, Department of Labor. 

ACTION: Notice of request for public 

comments. 

SUMMARY: The Department of Labor, as 

part of its continuing effort to reduce 

paperwork and respondent burden, 

conducts a pre-clearance consultation 

program to provide the general public 

and Federal agencies with an 

opportunity to comment on proposed 

and continuing collections of 

information in accordance with the 

Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 [44 

U.S.C. 3506(c)(2)(A)]. This program 

helps to assure that requested data can 

be provided in the desired format, 

reporting burden (time and financial 

resources) is minimized, collection 

instruments are clearly understood, and 

the impact of collection requirements on 

respondents can be properly assessed. 

Currently, the Mine Safety and Health 

Administration (MSHA) is soliciting 

comments concerning the extension of 

the information collection for 30 CFR 

part 47. 

DATES: All comments must be 

postmarked or received by midnight 

Eastern Standard Time on June 14, 

2011. 

ADDRESSES: Comments must be clearly 

identified with the rule title and may be 

submitted to MSHA by any of the 

following methods: 

(1) Electronic mail: zzMSHAComments@dol.gov. 

(2) Facsimile: 202–693–9441. 

(3) Regular Mail: MSHA, Office of 

Standards, Regulations, and Variances, 

1100 Wilson Boulevard, Room 2350, 

Arlington, VA 22209–3939. 

(4) Hand Delivery or Courier: MSHA, 

Office of Standards, Regulations, and 

Variances, 1100 Wilson Boulevard, 

Room 2350, Arlington, VA 22209–3939. 

Sign in at the receptionist’s desk on the 

21st floor. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Mario Distasio, Chief of the Economic 

Analysis Division, Office of Standards, 

Regulations, and Variances, MSHA, at 

distasio.mario@dol.gov (e-mail), 202– 

693–9445 (voice mail), 202–693–9441 

(facsimile). 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

I. Background 

Section 101(a)(7) of the Federal Mine 

Safety and Health Act of 1977, as 

amended (Mine Act) requires, in part, 

that mandatory standards prescribe the 

use of labels or other appropriate forms 

of warning as are necessary to insure 

that miners are apprised of all hazards 

to which they are exposed, relevant 

symptoms and appropriate emergency 

treatment, and proper conditions and 

precautions for safe use or exposure. 

MSHA collected evidence from the 

National Institute for Occupational 

Safety and Health’s (NIOSH) 

Occupational Health Survey of Mining 

and other sources indicating that there 

were chemical exposures occurring in 

every type of mine, although every 

miner may not have been exposed. 

MSHA became concerned that miners 

were being exposed to chemicals and 

may not have known the hazards of 

those chemicals or the appropriate 

precautions to prevent injury or illness 

caused by exposure to a hazardous 

chemical. 

II. Desired Focus of Comments 

MSHA is particularly interested in 

comments that: 

• Evaluate whether the collection of 

information is necessary for the proper 

performance of the functions of the 

agency, including whether the 

information has practical utility; 

• Evaluate the accuracy of the 

agency’s estimate of the burden of the 

collection of information, including the 

validity of the methodology and 

assumptions used; 

• Enhance the quality, utility, and 

clarity of the information to be 

collected; and 

• Minimize the burden of the 

collection of information on those who 

are to respond, including the use of 

appropriate automated, electronic, 

mechanical, or other technological 

collection techniques or other forms of 

information technology, e.g., permitting 

electronic submissions of responses. 

A copy of the information collection 

request can be obtained by contacting 

the person listed in the FOR FURTHER

INFORMATION section of this notice, or 

viewed on the Internet at http:// 

www.msha.gov and by selecting 

‘‘FedReg. Docs’’ under ‘‘Rules & Regs’’ on 

the right side of the screen. On the next 

screen, select ‘‘Information Collection 

Requests’’ to view documents 

supporting this Federal Register notice. 

III. Current Actions 

This notice contains the request for an 

extension of the existing collection of 

information in 30 CFR Part 47. MSHA 

does not intend to publish the results 

from this information collection and is 

not seeking approval to either display or 

not display the expiration date for the 

OMB approval of this information 

collection. 

There are no certification exceptions 

identified with this information 

collection and the collection of this 

information does not employ statistical 

methods. 

Type of Review: Renewal. 

Agency: Mine Safety and Health 

Administration. 

OMB Number: 1219–0133. 

Frequency: Daily, weekly, monthly, 

semi-annually, and on occasion. 

Affected Public: Business or other forprofit. 

Cost to Federal Government: There 

are no costs to the federal government. 

Total Number of Respondents: 22,381. 

Total Number of Responses: 813,753. 

Total Burden Hours: 177,668 hours. 

Total Hour Burden Cost (operating/ 

maintaining): $13,199. 

Comments submitted in response to 

this notice will be summarized and 

included in the request for Office of 


srobinson on DSKHWCL6B1PROD with NOTICES