alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**Exhibit 32.1****CERTIFICATION OF PERIODIC REPORT**Theundersigned officer of **Standard Aero Holdings, Inc.**herebycertifies pursuant to Section 906 ofthe Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, to suchofficer’s knowledge that: 1. the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Standard AeroHoldings, Inc. for the year ended December 31, 2005 (the“Report”) fully complies with the requirements of Section13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and  2. the information contained in the Report fairly presents,in all material respects, the financial condition andresults of operations of Standard Aero Holdings, Inc.     Date:April 14, 2006           By: /s/ David Shaw      Name: David Shaw  Title: Chief Executive Officer     The foregoing certification is being furnished solely to accompany the Report pursuant to 18 U.S.C.§ 1350, and is not being filed for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934,as amended, and is not to be incorporated by reference into any filing of the Company, whether madebefore or after the date hereof, regardless of any general incorporation language in such filing.A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to theCompany and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commissionor its staff upon request.
§ 30.100 In general, how does an employee file an initial claim for benefits? ( a ) To claim benefits under EEOICPA, an employee must file a claim in writing with OWCP. Form EE-1 should be used for this purpose, but any written communication that requests benefits under EEOICPA will be considered a claim. It will, however, be necessary for an employee to submit a Form EE-1 for OWCP to fully develop the claim. Copies of Form EE-1 may be obtained from OWCP or on the internet at *http://www.dol.gov/owcp/energy/index.htm .* The employee must sign the written claim that is filed with OWCP, but another person may present the claim to OWCP on the employee's behalf.
( b ) The employee may choose, at his or her own option, to file for benefits for only certain conditions that are potentially compensable under the Act (*e.g.*, the employee may not want to claim for an occupational illness or a covered illness for which a payment has been received that would necessitate an offset of EEOICPA benefits under the provisions of § 30.505(b) of these regulations). The employee may withdraw his or her claim by so requesting in writing to OWCP at any time before OWCP determines his or her eligibility for benefits.
( c ) Except as provided in paragraph (d) of this section, a claim is considered to be “filed” on the date that the employee mails his or her claim to OWCP, as determined by postmark or other carrier's date marking, or on the date that the claim is received by OWCP, whichever is the earliest determinable date. However, in no event will a claim under Part B of EEOICPA be considered to be “filed” earlier than July 31, 2001, nor will a claim under Part E of EEOICPA be considered to be “filed” earlier than October 30, 2000. ( 1 ) The employee shall affirm that the information provided on the Form EE-1 is true, and must inform OWCP of any subsequent changes to that information.
( 2 ) Except for a covered uranium employee filing a claim under Part B of the Act, the employee is responsible for submitting with his or her claim, or arranging for the submission of, medical evidence to OWCP that establishes that he or she sustained an occupational illness and/or a covered illness. This required medical evidence is described in § 30.114 and does not refer to mere recitations of symptoms the employee experienced that the employee believes indicate that he or she sustained an occupational illness or a covered illness.
( d ) For those claims under Part E of EEOICPA that were originally filed with DOE as claims for assistance under former section 7385o of EEOICPA (which was repealed on October 28, 2004), a claim is considered to be “filed” on the date that the employee mailed his or her claim to DOE, as determined by postmark or other carrier's date marking, or on the date that the claim was received by DOE, whichever is the earliest determinable date. However, in no event will a claim referred to in this paragraph be considered to be “filed” earlier than October 30, 2000.
[71 FR 78534, Dec. 29, 2006, as amended at 84 FR 3047, Feb. 8, 2019]
§ 9.97 Sonoita. ( a ) *Name.* The name of the viticultural area described in this section is “Sonoita.”
( b ) *Approved maps.* The appropriate maps for determining the boundaries of Sonoita viticultural area are seven U.S.G.S. maps. They are titled: ( 1 ) Benson Quadrangle, 15 minute series, 1958.
( 2 ) Fort Huachuca Quadrangle, 15 minute series, 1958.
( 3 ) Elgin Quadrangle, 15 minute series, 1958.
( 4 ) Lochiel Quadrangle, 15 minute series, 1958.
( 5 ) Mount Wrightson Quadrangle, 15 minute series, 1958.
( 6 ) Sunnyside Quadrangle, 15 minute series, 1958.
( 7 ) Empire Mountains Quadrangle, 15 minute series, 1958.
( c ) *Bouldary* — ( 1 ) *General.* The Sonoita viticultural area is located in Arizona. The starting point of the following boundary description is the summit of Mount Wrightson (9,543 feet) in the Santa Rita Mountains.
( 2 ) *Boundary Description* — ( i ) From the starting point southeastward in a straight line for approximately 24 miles, to the summit of Lookout Knob (6,171 feet) in the Canelo Hills.
( ii ) From there in a straight line eastward for approximately 10 miles, to the summit of Huachuca Peak (8,410 feet) in the Huachuca Mountains.
( iii ) From there north-northwestward for approximately 21 miles in a straight line to the summit of Granite Peak (7,413 feet) in the Whetstone Mountains.
( iv ) From there west-southwestward in a straight line for approximately 26 miles, to the summit of Mount Wrightson (the point of beginning).
[T.D. ATF-189, 49 FR 43054, Oct. 26, 1984]
(No. 74-CC-43

#### Dean Business Equipment Co., Inc., Claimant, *vs.*State of Illinois, Division of Vocational Rehabilitation, Respondent.

*Opinion filed February 20, 1974.*

Dean Business Equipment Co., Inc., Claimant, pro se.

William J. Scott, Attorney General; William E. Webber, Assistant Attorney General, for Respondent.

Per Curiam.
#### § 260.7 Time limits for issuing a decision when a hearing is not held.

If a claimant waives his or her right to appear at a hearing and the hearings officer does not schedule the case for hearing, or the evidence in the record supports a favorable decision without a hearing, or a hearing is not required pursuant to § 260.5(g), the hearings officer shall make every effort to issue a decision within 90 days from the date the appeal is filed: *Provided, however,* that if the hearings officer requests additional evidence it shall be requested within 45 days of the filing of the appeal and the hearings officer shall make every effort to issue a decision within 30 days after the additional evidence is received and the appellant comments on the evidence, or if no comment is received after the close of the comment period.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE DECEMBER
31, 1995 INTERIM FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY
REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAR-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             APR-01-1995
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1995
<CASH>                                       1,334,151
<SECURITIES>                                 1,422,357
<RECEIVABLES>                                    3,765
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                     41,438
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             3,022,722
<PP&E>                                         762,595
<DEPRECIATION>                                 652,510
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               3,339,632
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          748,774
<BONDS>                                         24,766
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       161,021
<OTHER-SE>                                   2,405,071
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 3,339,632
<SALES>                                         11,730
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               342,663
<CGS>                                           94,508
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             1,160,699
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              24,763
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (2,241,254)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (2,241,254)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (2,241,254)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.40)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.40)
        

</TABLE>
#### § 9.3 Delegations of the Administrator.

Most of the regulatory authorities of the Administrator contained in this part are delegated to appropriate TTB officers. Those TTB officers are specified in TTB Order 1135.9, Delegation of the Administrator's Authorities in 27 CFR Part 9, American Viticultural Areas. You may obtain a copy of this order by accessing the TTB Web site (*http://www.ttb.gov*) or by mailing a request to the Alcohol and Tobacco Tax and Trade Bureau, National Revenue Center, 550 Main Street, Room 1516, Cincinnati, OH 45202.
U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service

Mobile County, Alabama

Gopher TortoiseMitigation Bank

Issue

Background

Potential Solution

Mobile County Health Department is asking property owners to consult withthe U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (Service) if gopher tortoises reside on theirproperty.  Gopher tortoises (Gopherus polyphemus) are protected by federallaw in Mobile County.  It is illegal to kill them or destroy their habitat.  TheHealth Department is delaying percolation test approvals for septic tankinstallation pending assurances from the Service that their actions will not resultin violating the Endangered Species Act.

Habitat loss is the greatest threat to gopher tortoises, particularly in MobileCounty which has undergone a 94 percent increase in residential development inthe past eight years.  Approximately 1,300 homes will be constructed this yearon lands which historically provided habitat for this dry land tortoise.  Inaddition to new residential development, there has been a 100 percent increasein new roads and infrastructure to provide for Mobile County’s populationgrowth, which is up 6.4 percent since 1990.

Gopher tortoises need large parcels of undeveloped land that is not fragmentedby roads or other growth-related development.  Private property owners needassurances that they can move forward with residential development withoutcostly delays and/or major changes to their plans.  Mobile County needs toprovide the infrastructure necessary to support its expanding population in aresponsible way that manages growth and prepares for the future.

Big Creek Lake and the surrounding land are in the midst of the area being mostheavily impacted by new growth.  Developing an endangered species mitigationbank on property owned by Mobile’s Board of Water and Sewer (BWS) would,at least temporarily, provide solutions to some of Mobile County’s problems by:

1) Allowing private property owners to apply for a routine permit to relocatetortoises from their property on to the mitigation bank when no otheralternative exists;

2) Providing Mobile County mitigation alternatives for unavoidable impactscaused by roadways, utilities and other infrastructure; and

3) Providing a revenue source to the BWS which would be used to manage alarge, contiguous tract of land for optimum gopher tortoise habitat and topotentially acquire additional buffer land around Big Creek Lake, Mobile’s onlysource of drinking water.

    -       - Superintendent of Documents
      - 2023-07-14T05:13:13-0400
      - Government Publishing Office, Washington, DC 20401
      - Government Publishing Office
      - Government Publishing Office attests that this document has not been altered since it was disseminated by Government Publishing Office
#### § 229.21 When a spouse is eligible for an increase under the overall minimum.

Normally, only the employee annuity receives the amount of the overall minimum increase. However, a spouse annuity may be increased under the O/M in cases in which the O/M benefit amount exceeds the total amount of the employee and spouse annuity.
§ 10.207 May an employee who returns to work, then stops work again due to the effects of the injury, receive COP? If the employee recovers from disability and returns to work, then becomes disabled again and stops work, the employer shall pay any of the 45 days of entitlement to COP not used during the initial period of disability where: ( a ) The employee completes Form CA-2a and elects to receive regular pay;
( b ) OWCP did not deny the original claim for disability;
( c ) The disability recurs and the employee stops work within 45 days of the time the employee first returned to work following the initial period of disability; and
( d ) Pay has not been continued for the entire 45 days.
<PAGE>

                THE TRAVELERS INSURANCE COMPANY AND SUBSIDIARIES

                                                                   Exhibit 32.01
                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of The Travelers Insurance
Company (the "Company") for the quarterly period ended September 30, 2003 as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
"Report"), George C. Kokulis, as Chief Executive Officer of the Company, and
Glenn D. Lammey, as Chief Financial Officer of the Company, each hereby
certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

         (1)      The Report fully complies with the requirements of section
                  13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2)      The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
                  all material respects, the financial condition and results
                  of operations of the Company.


/s/ George C. Kokulis
--------------------------------

George C. Kokulis
Chief Executive Officer

November 14, 2003

/s/ Glenn D. Lammey
--------------------------------

Glenn D. Lammey
Chief Financial Officer

November 14, 2003

This certification accompanies each Report pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of
Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

                                       27
§ 7.68 Name and address for malt beverages that are imported in a container. ( a ) *General.* This section applies to malt beverages that are imported in a container, as defined in § 7.1. See § 7.67 for rules regarding name and address requirements applicable to malt beverages that are domestically bottled after importation. See 19 CFR parts 102 and 134 for U.S. Customs and Border Protection country of origin marking requirements.
( b ) *Mandatory labeling statement.* The label on malt beverages imported in containers, as defined in § 7.1, must state the words “imported by” or a similar appropriate phrase, followed by the name and address of the importer. ( 1 ) For purposes of this section, the importer is the holder of the importer's basic permit that either makes the original customs entry or is the person for whom such entry is made, or the holder of the importer's basic permit that is the agent, distributor, or franchise holder for the particular brand of imported alcohol beverages and that places the order abroad.
( 2 ) The address of the importer must be stated as the city and State of the principal place of business and must be consistent with the address reflected on the importer's basic permit. Addresses may, but are not required to, include additional information such as street names, counties, zip codes, phone numbers, and website addresses. The postal abbreviation of the State name may be used; for example, California may be abbreviated as CA.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<CIK> 0000732713
<NAME> BELLSOUTH CORPORATION
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1995
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1995
<CASH>                                             649
<SECURITIES>                                        77
<RECEIVABLES>                                    3,501
<ALLOWANCES>                                       173
<INVENTORY>                                        416
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 4,939
<PP&E>                                          45,973
<DEPRECIATION>                                  25,394
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  30,118
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            5,709
<BONDS>                                          7,867
<COMMON>                                         1,007
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<OTHER-SE>                                      11,324
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    30,118
<SALES>                                            345
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                13,121
<CGS>                                              473
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    7,098
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 2,774
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   159
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 532
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  2,768
<INCOME-TAX>                                     1,106
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              1,663
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                (2,734)
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (1,071)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (1.08)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (1.08)
        

</TABLE>
### subpart 3—national activities for school safety
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY ELEV

 584.94

 584.44

 581.27

 578.85

 579.12

 578.19

 582.08

 582.39

 583.84

 585.10

 584.14

 582.21

 583.07

 579.99

 578.02

 577.33

 580.74

 584.10

 584.59

 584.18

 584.14

 583.77

 583.28

 582.16

 579.34

 581.04

 580.24

 580.61

 579.73

 581.08

 583.69

 22,470

 22,161

 20,258

 18,879

 19,029

 18,515

 20,734

 20,919

 21,793

 22,570

 21,976

 20,811

 21,325

 19,518

 18,421

 18,046

 19,950

 21,952

 22,254

 22,001

 21,976

 21,750

 21,453

 20,782

 19,153

 20,123

 19,662

 19,875

 19,372

 20,147

 21,702

STORAGE

-357

-309

-1,903

-1,379

+150

-514

+2,219

+185

+874

+777

-594

-1,165

+514

-1,807

-1,097

-375

+1,904

+2,002

+302

-253

-25

-226

-297

-671

-1,629

+970

-461

+213

-503

+775

+1,555

CHANGE

2,939

2,965

2,162

2,397

3,239

2,902

4,283

3,205

3,466

3,483

3,920

3,927

4,868

3,593

4,049

4,503

5,654

19,012

19,029

18,463

18,524

18,452

15,915

12,889

9,812

9,044

6,906

5,002

4,633

5,329

5,729

INFLOW

 3,033

 3,033

 3,034

 2,498

 3,078

 3,076

 3,078

 3,024

 2,940

 3,006

 4,134

 4,429

 4,524

 4,419

 4,513

 4,607

 4,607

 8,516

 8,192

 7,962

 7,921

 7,896

 7,925

 7,965

 7,908

 7,857

 7,031

 4,805

 4,800

 4,851

 4,847

POWER

 0

 0

 0

 508

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 9,399

 10,597

 10,544

 10,531

 10,577

 8,053

 5,176

 2,638

 610

 20

 0

 0

 0

 10

SPILL

 85

 85

 85

 85

 85

 85

 85

 85

 85

 85

 85

 85

 85

 85

 85

 85

 85

 85

 85

 85

 85

 85

 85

 85

 85

 85

 85

 85

 85

 85

 85

FISHTRAP

 1

 3

 2

 1

 0

 0

 1

 3

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 4

 0

 2

 3

 3

 0

 0

 8

 2

 1

 2

 3

 2

 5

 2

 2

 3

C.F.S.

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

MARCH 2016 KESWICK RESERVOIR DAILY OPERATIONS RUN DATE: April 1, 2016

RES.

EVAP

C.F.S.

COMPUTED*

ACRE-FEET

RELEASE - C.F.S. 

TOTALS -1,125 230,294 159,509 68,663 2,635 53

ACRE-FEET -1,125 456,788 316,386 136,193 5,227 105

SUMMARY

RELEASE (ACRE-FEET)

POWER 316,386

SPILL 136,193

 22,827

FISH TRAP 5,227

SPRING

CR. P. P.

RELEASE (1)

 304

 450

 482

 116

 342

 687

 1,081

 1,761

 2,061

 1,908

 1,775

 1,888

 1,988

 1,964

 1,999

 1,930

 2,062

 2,043

 2,131

 2,133

 2,136

 2,141

 2,100

 380

 179

 160

 261

 704

 154

 14

 45

 37,379

 74,141

*COMPUTED INFLOW IS SUM OF CHANGE IN STORAGE, RELEASES, AND EVAPORATION.

(1) EVAPORATION RECORDS TAKEN FROM SHASTA PAN.

SHASTA

RELEASE

C.F.S

 2,381

 2,353

 1,546

 2,223

 2,079

 1,179

 2,407

 975

 1,198

 833

 560

 401

 551

 445

 1,262

 1,882

 3,097

 17,515

 17,239

 16,888

 17,088

 17,034

 14,719

 13,787

 11,638

 9,849

 6,758

 4,247

 4,327

 5,459

 5,651

 187,571

 372,047
MEMORANDUM OPINION

No. 04-10-00031-CR

IN RE Jason MIEARS

Original Proceeding1

PER CURIAM

Sitting: Catherine Stone, Chief Justice

Sandee Bryan Marion, Justice

Marialyn Barnard, Justice

Delivered and Filed: April 7, 2010

PETITIONS DENIED

Relator Jason Miears filed numerous petitions in this court in Cause Numbers 04-10-

00031-CR through 04-10-00040-CR.2

 1 This proceeding arises out of Cause No. 2009-CR-6566, styled State of Texas v. Jason Miears, pending in 

the 379th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas, the Honorable Ron Rangel presiding.

 The court on its own motion has consolidated these cases 

into Cause Number 04-10-00031-CR. The court has considered relator’s petitions and is of the 

2

 Cause Number 04-10-00031-CR (six petitions for writ of mandamus); Cause Number 04-10-00032-CR 

(one petition for writ of mandamus); Cause Number 04-10-00033-CR (one petition for writ of mandamus); Cause 

Number 04-10-00034-CR (six petitions for writ of prohibition); Cause Number 04-10-00035-CR (two petitions 

entitled “writ of execution”); Cause Number 04-10-00036-CR (four petitions entitled “petition for writ of quo 

warranto”); Cause Number 04-10-00037-CR (one petition entitled “writ of procendo”); Cause Number 04-10-

00038-CR (four petitions entitled “writ of capias profine”); Cause Number 04-10-00039-CR (five petitions for writ 

of injunction); Cause Number 04-10-00040-CR (one petition entitled “writ of attachment”). 
04-10-00031-CR

- 2 -

opinion that relator is not entitled to the relief sought in any of the petitions. Accordingly, the 

petitions are DENIED. See TEX. R. APP. P. 52.8(a). 

PER CURIAM

DO NOT PUBLISH