alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 404.1225 Records—for wages paid prior to 1987. ( a ) *Who keeps the records.* Every State which enters into an agreement shall keep, or require the political subdivisions whose employees are included under its agreement to keep, accurate records of all remuneration (whether in cash or in a medium other than cash) paid to employees performing services covered by that agreement. These records shall show for each employee: ( 1 ) The employee's name, address, and Social Security number;
( 2 ) The total amount of remuneration (including any amount withheld as contributions or for any other reason) and the date the remuneration was paid and the period of services covered by the payment;
( 3 ) The amount of remuneration which constitutes wages (see § 404.1041 for wages and §§ 404.1047-404.1059 for exclusions from wages); and
( 4 ) The amount of the employee's contribution, if any, withheld or collected, and if collected at a time other than the time such payment was made, the date collected. If the total remuneration (paragraph (a)(2) of this section) and the amount which is subject to contribution (paragraph (a)(3) of this section) are not equal, the reason shall be stated. The State shall keep copies of all returns, reports, schedules, and statements required by this subpart, copies of claims for refund or credit, and copies of documents about each adjustment made under § 404.1265 or § 404.1271 as part of its records. These records may be maintained by the State or, for employees of a political subdivision, by the political subdivision. Each State shall use forms and systems of accounting as will enable the Commissioner to determine whether the contributions for which the State is liable are correctly figured and paid.
( b ) *Place and period of time for keeping records.* All records required by this section shall: ( 1 ) Be kept at one or more convenient and safe locations accessible to reviewing personnel (see § 404.1232(a));
( 2 ) Be available for inspection by reviewing personnel at any time; and
( 3 ) Be maintained for at least four years from the date of the event recorded. (This four-year requirement applies regardless of whether, in the meantime, the employing entity has been legally dissolved or, before April 20, 1983, the agreement was terminated in its entirety or in part.)
(Approved by the Office of Management and Budget under control number 0960-0425) [53 FR 32976, Aug. 29, 1988, as amended at 62 FR 38451, July 18, 1997; 66 FR 28836, May 25, 2001]
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY HIGH

 15,816

 14,715

 15,278

 14,887

 13,863

 13,033

 12,266

 12,831

 18,001

 17,082

 17,336

 19,533

 18,568

 16,657

 16,655

 16,243

 15,792

 14,732

 15,381

 16,223

 15,692

 16,360

 18,225

 19,045

 19,189

 19,736

 20,085

 19,847

 17,789

 15,918

 15,632

 4,323

 4,361

 4,954

 6,050

 4,398

 4,216

 3,332

 3,358

 4,047

 2,778

 3,322

 4,819

 5,199

 4,959

 6,014

 5,777

 6,317

 6,160

 7,174

 6,289

 5,206

 4,748

 5,479

 5,413

 5,440

 5,641

 7,663

 7,642

 7,679

 6,804

 7,217

 9,827

 9,807

 10,164

 10,619

 9,174

 8,082

 7,305

 7,942

 9,673

 9,154

 10,349

 11,395

 12,125

 11,556

 11,612

 11,307

 11,398

 11,066

 11,635

 11,166

 10,425

 10,302

 11,450

 11,761

 12,144

 12,749

 13,699

 14,344

 13,390

 12,326

 11,836

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

MARCH 2022 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: April 4, 2022

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

PORT CHICAGO BOTTOM IN SUISUN BAY
I 

114TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 3870 

To amend title 38, United States Code, to provide for the treatment of 

veterans who participated in the cleanup of Enewetak Atoll as radiation 

exposed veterans for purposes of the presumption of service-connection 

of certain disabilities by the Secretary of Veterans Affairs. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

NOVEMBER 2, 2015 

Mr. TAKAI introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee 

on Veterans’ Affairs 

A BILL 

To amend title 38, United States Code, to provide for the 

treatment of veterans who participated in the cleanup 

of Enewetak Atoll as radiation exposed veterans for purposes of the presumption of service-connection of certain 

disabilities by the Secretary of Veterans Affairs. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Atomic Veterans 

5 Healthcare Parity Act’’. 


emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 3870 IH

1 SEC. 2. TREATMENT OF VETERANS WHO PARTICIPATED IN 

2 CLEANUP OF ENEWETAK ATOLL AS RADI3 ATION EXPOSED VETERANS FOR PURPOSES 

4 OF PRESUMPTION OF SERVICE-CONNECTION 

5 OF CERTAIN DISABILITIES BY DEPARTMENT 

6 OF VETERANS AFFAIRS. 

7 Section 1112(c)(3)(B) of title 38, United States 

8 Code, is amended by adding at the end the following new 

9 clause: 

10 ‘‘(v) Cleanup of Enewetak Atoll during the 

11 period beginning on January 1, 1977, and end12 ing on December 31, 1980.’’. 

Æ 


emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with BILLS
Exhibit 10.1


 


November __, 2018


 


Capitol Investment Corp. IV


509 7th Street, N.W.


Washington, D.C. 20004


 





This letter is to confirm the undersigned’s
commitment that, if funds are needed by Capitol Investment Corp. IV (the “Company”) and upon request by the Company,
the undersigned will provide additional loans of up to an aggregate of $_____ to the Company. The undersigned understands that
if the Company does not consummate a business combination (as described in the Company's final prospectus, dated August 15, 2017),
all amounts loaned to the Company hereunder will be forgiven except to the extent that the Company has funds available to it outside
of its trust account established in connection with the Company's initial public offering.


 





 


________________________
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff—Appellee, v. Eugene BORKOWSKI, Defendant—Appellant.

No. 05-3550.

United States Court of Appeals,. Eighth Circuit.

Submitted May 18, 2006.

Decided Aug. 18, 2006.

Katharine Fincham, U.S. Attorney’s Office, Kansas City, MO, for Plaintiff-Appellee.

Stephen Carl Moss, Federal Public Defender’s Office, Kansas City, MO, Defendant-Appellant.

Eugene Borkowski, Leavenworth, KS, pro se.

Before LOKEN, Chief Judge, JOHN R. GIBSON and COLLOTON, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

Eugene Borkowski pleaded guilty to child pornography possession and distribution offenses after an investigation uncovered more than 600 pornographic images, many depicting adult men engaged in sexually explicit acts with young children. The presentence investigation report recommended a four-level increase for possession of “material that portrays sadistic or masochistic conduct,” U.S.S.G. § 2G2.2(b)(3) (2003), which produced an advisory guidelines sentencing range of 87 to 108 months. At sentencing, the district court1 overruled Borkowski’s objection to *529this increase and sentenced him to 108 months in prison. BorkowsH appeals, arguing as he did to the district court that the Ex Post Facto Clause and the Due Process Clause prohibit the retroactive application of *United States v. Booker,*543 U.S. 220, 125 S.Ct. 738, 160 L.Ed.2d 621 (2005), in this manner. More specifically, he argues that he “is entitled to the benefit of the Sixth Amendment holding of *Blakely*and *Booker,*but cannot be disadvantaged by the remedial portion of *Booker.*”

We have squarely rejected this argument in a number of decisions issued after the filing of Borkowski’s appeal brief. *United States v. Lyons,*450 F.3d 834, 837-38 (8th Cir.2006); *United States v. Counce,*445 F.3d 1016, 1019 (8th Cir.2006); *United States v. Wade,*435 F.3d 829, 831 (8th Cir.2006). To briefly summarize these controlling decisions, the Ex Post Facto Clause does not apply to actions by the judiciary; Borkowski’s sentence does not violate the due process concept of fair warning because a sentencing court could have imposed the four-level enhancement based on facts found by a preponderance of the evidence at the time he committed the offenses; and the Supreme Court in *Booker*expressly directed that both facets of its decision be applied retroactively. *See Wade,*435 F.3d at 831-32.

The judgment of the district court is affirmed.

1

. The HONORABLE GARY A. FENNER, United States District Judge for the Western *529District of Missouri.
**Exhibit 13.1**

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. Section 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

** **

Inconnection with the Annual Report of Patni Computer Systems Limited (the “Company”)on Form 20-F for the period ended December 31, 2008  as filed with the Securities and ExchangeCommission on the date hereof (the “Report”), Jeya Kumar, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, herebycertify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

1.      The Report fullycomplies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

2.      The informationcontained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

Date:June 16, 2009

 

 
| /s/ JEYA KUMAR           |   |
|--------------------------|--------|
| Jeya Kumar               |   |
| Chief Executive  Officer |   |

 

----
Exhibit 99.1

Annual Statement of
ComplianceProtective Life Secured Trust 2005-8 (the "Trust")

I, Joseph A. Lloret, a duly elected and acting officer of The Bank of New York ("Indenture Trustee"), do hereby certify on
behalf of the Indenture Trustee, that:

1.     I
have reviewed and examined the performance by the Indenture Trustee of the
collection and distribution of trust money pursuant to
Section 5.02 and, if applicable, Section 6.06 of the Indenture
pursuant to which the Trust's notes (the "Notes") were issued during the fiscal year
ending December 31, 2005 (the "Relevant
Year"); and

2.     Based
upon my review and examination described in 1 above, and except as provided in the Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm, dated March 31, 2006, prepared by the Trust's
independent registered public accounting firm in accordance with Section 10 of the Expense and Indemnity
Agreement, to the best of my knowledge, the collection of payments on the funding agreements and distribution of payments to noteholders
pursuant to Section 5.02 and, if applicable, Section 6.06 of the
Indenture was performed in a satisfactory manner in all material respects
throughout the Relevant Year.

THE BANK OF NEW YORK, as Indenture Trustee

|By: |  | /s/JOSEPH A. LLORET
      Name:  Joseph A. Lloret
      Title:    Assistant Vice President |  |  |  | 
|--- |  | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ |  |  |  | 

Date:  March 31, 2006
Order entered March 6, 2019

In The 

## Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

No. 05
- 18
- 01146
- CV
WILLIAM DAVID HOLLID AY, Appellant

V. JOSEPH WICKER GRAY, Appellee On Appeal from the 160t h Judicial District Court

Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. DC
- 17
- 10117



### O RDER Before the Court is the parties’ March 5, 2019 joint motion for extension of time to file appellee’s brief. In the motion, the parties assert that this Court has “ord ered the parties to attend mediation in this matter before Mr. John Shipp.” Although our records do not reflect any such mediation order, we GRANT the parties’ motion to the extent either a motion to dismiss the appeal or appellee’s brief shall be filed b y May 16, 2019.

/s/ BILL WHITEHILL JUSTICE
Exhibit (12)

                                NYNEX CORPORATION
                COMPUTATION OF RATIO OF EARNINGS TO FIXED CHARGES
                                  (In millions)
                                   (unaudited)
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>

                                                          For the
                                                        Three Months
                                                           Ended
                                                          June 30,                   For the Year Ended December 31,
                                                            1997        1996         1995         1994          1993         1992
<S>                                                      <C>          <C>          <C>          <C>          <C>           <C>      
Earnings
     Earnings before Interest Expense,
      Extraordinary Item and Cumulative
      Effect of Change in Accounting Principle           $   909.7    $ 1,982.6    $ 1,803.4    $ 1,466.4    $   387.8     $ 1,995.8
     Federal, State and Local Income Taxes                   301.5        741.3        640.9        303.7       (172.7)        570.4
     Estimated Interest Portion of Rental Expense             50.7         58.5        117.3        109.0        117.3         126.2
     Priority Distributions                                     --        116.5         47.1         29.9         15.2            --
                                                         ---------    ---------    ---------    ---------    ---------     ---------
         Total Earnings                                  $ 1,261.9    $ 2,898.9    $ 2,608.7    $ 1,909.0    $   346.9     $ 2,692.4
                                                         =========    =========    =========    =========    =========     =========

Fixed Charges
     Total Interest Expense                              $   369.6    $   636.6    $   733.9    $   673.8    $   659.5     $   684.6
     Estimated Interest Portion of Rental Expense             50.7         58.5        117.3        109.0        117.3         126.2
     Priority Distributions                                     --        116.5         47.1         29.9         15.2            --
                                                         ---------    ---------    ---------    ---------    ---------     ---------
         Total Fixed Charges                             $   420.3    $   811.6    $   898.3    $   812.7    $   792.0     $   810.8
                                                         =========    =========    =========    =========    =========     =========

Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges*                           3.00         3.57         2.90         2.35          .44          3.32
                                                         =========    =========    =========    =========    =========     =========
</TABLE>

*    Earnings were inadequate to cover Fixed Charges by $445.1 million for the
     year ended December 31, 1993 as a result of $2.1 billion of fourth quarter
     1993 business restructuring charges ($1.4 billion after-tax).
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY

 62,981

 62,906

 63,103

 63,267

 63,254

 63,078

 62,739

 62,476

 62,522

 62,588

 62,288

 62,162

 61,959

 61,726

 61,488

 61,397

 61,219

 61,040

 60,895

 60,680

 60,519

 60,370

 60,304

 60,044

 59,792

 59,563

 59,542

 59,563

 59,422

 59,369

 59,430

 86,978

 86,299

 85,350

 84,439

 83,694

 83,201

 82,918

 82,541

 81,837

 81,114

 80,754

 80,183

 79,930

 79,944

 79,957

 79,818

 79,771

 79,712

 79,619

 79,625

 79,526

 79,414

 79,202

 79,182

 79,189

 79,149

 78,918

 78,621

 78,496

 78,285

 77,950

STORAGE - A.F. 

 149,959

 149,205

 148,453

 147,706

 146,948

 146,279

 145,657

 145,017

 144,359

 143,702

 143,042

 142,345

 141,889

 141,670

 141,445

 141,215

 140,990

 140,752

 140,514

 140,305

 140,045

 139,784

 139,506

 139,226

 138,981

 138,712

 138,460

 138,184

 137,918

 137,654

 137,380

515

493

611

614

608

-1,427

431

445

457

501

356

679

423

298

282

294

202

205

297

205

188

265

183

-230

30

305

309

278

261

270

299

180

113

232

237

8,309

-9,846

117

122

125

170

23

328

193

188

169

178

89

85

177

100

57

133

43

-371

-94

169

182

139

127

137

161

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

JULY 2022 FULL NATURAL FLOW AT NEW MELONES DAM RUN DATE: 08/02/2022

TOTALS -13,244 1,972

* October 1,

3,911

 553.7

 553.9

 554.4

 554.8

 571.3

 551.8

 552.0

 552.3

 552.5

 552.8

 552.9

 553.5

 553.9

 554.3

 554.6

 555.0

 555.2

 555.3

 555.7

 555.9

 556.0

 556.3

 556.3

 555.6

 555.4

 555.8

 556.1

 556.4

 556.6

 556.9

 557.2

DONNELLS

RES

BEARDSLEY

RES

2021 TO DATE

NEW

MELONES

INFLOW

C.F.S

NATURAL

RIVER

C.F.S

ACCUM *

FULL

NATURAL

1000 A.F.

RESERVOIR

TOTAL

-665

-754

-752

-747

-758

-669

-622

-640

-658

-657

-660

-697

-456

-219

-225

-230

-225

-238

-238

-209

-260

-261

-278

-280

-245

-269

-252

-276

-266

-264

-274

CHANGE

A.F. C.F.S.

-335

-380

-379

-377

-382

-337

-314

-323

-332

-331

-333

-351

-230

-110

-113

-116

-113

-120

-120

-105

-131

-132

-140

-141

-124

-136

-127

-139

-134

-133

-138

ACRE-FEET
(No. 6869

#### Atlantic Richfield Company, Claimant, *vs.*State of Illinois, Department of Agriculture, Respondent.

*Opinion filed February 1, 1973.*

D. K. McIntosh, Attorney for Claimant.

William J. Scott, Attorney General; Saul R. Wexler, Assistant Attorney General, for Respondent.

Per Curiam.
§ 10.434 If OWCP finds that the recipient of an overpayment was not at fault, what criteria are used to decide whether to waive recovery of it? If OWCP finds that the recipient of an overpayment was not at fault, repayment will still be required unless: ( a ) Adjustment or recovery of the overpayment would defeat the purpose of the FECA (see § 10.436), or
( b ) Adjustment or recovery of the overpayment would be against equity and good conscience (see § 10.437).
###### Editorial Note on Part 44

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 44 appear by T.D. ATF-464, 66 FR 43480, Aug. 20, 2001, and T.D. ATF-480, 67 FR 30801-30803, May 8, 2002.

#### § 44.221 Application of drawback of tax.

Allowance of drawback of tax shall apply only to tobacco products, and cigarette papers and tubes, on which tax has been paid, when such articles are shipped to a foreign country, Puerto Rico, the Virgin Islands, or a possession of the United States. Such drawback shall be allowed only to the person who paid the tax on such articles and who files claim and otherwise complies with the provisions of this subpart.

(72 Stat. 1419, 68A Stat. 908; 26 U.S.C. 5706, 7653)

[T.D. 6871, 31 FR 55, Jan. 4, 1966. Redesignated at 40 FR 16835, Apr. 15, 1975, and amended by T.D. ATF-232, 51 FR 28089, Aug. 5, 1986; T.D. ATF-243, 51 FR 43194, Dec. 1, 1986]
### IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 14

- 50472

ROBERT KRAMER , Plaintiff

- Appellant

v. CORRECTIONAL OFFICER A. CASTANEDA; RUBEN SANCHEZ, John Doe #1; IMER COLLINS, Jane Doe #1

- Property Officer; C. LAWSON, Regional Grievance; GORGE MOTA, John Doe #2 , Defendant s - Appellee s

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas USDC No. 4:13

- CV

- 20

Before JOLLY, DENNIS, and PRADO, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: * Robert Kramer, Texas prisoner # 643733, moves for the appointment of counsel and for leave to proceed in forma pauperis (IF P) on appeal from the dismissal of his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action as frivolous. By moving to proceed IFP, Kramer challenges the district court’s certification that his appeal is not taken in good faith. See Baugh v. Taylor , 1 17 F.3d 197, 202 (5th Cir. 1997).

* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5 , the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit 

### FILED March 31, 2016 Lyle W. Cayce Clerk Case: 14-50472 Document: 00513446011 Page: 1 Date Filed: 03/31/2016No. 14

- 50472

2 To proceed IFP, a litigant must be economically eligible, and the appeal must be taken in good faith. Carson v. Polley , 689 F.2d 562, 586 (5th Cir. 1982). An appeal is taken in good faith if it raises legal points that are arguable on the merits and thus nonfrivolous. Howard v. King , 707 F.2d 215, 220 (5th Cir. 1983)

. Kramer has not shown that his appeal has arguable merit. See id

. Accordingly, his motio n for leave to proceed IFP is denied , and the appe al is dismissed as frivolous. See Baugh , 117 F.3d at 202 n.24; 5 TH C IR

. R . 42.2. The district court’s dismissal of Kramer’s action as frivolous and our dismissal count as two strikes under 28 U.S.C. § 1915 (g). See Adepegba v. Hammons , 103 F.3d 383, 387

- 88 (5th Cir. 1996). Kramer has previously accumulated two other strikes. See Kramer v. Hanley , No. 1:07

- cv - 00112 ( W.D. Tex. June 21, 2007 ); Kramer v. B i sco , No. 6:09

- cv - 36 (S.D. Tex. Aug. 15, 2011 ). Kramer is , therefore , barred from proceeding IFP in any civil action or appeal filed while he is incarcerated or detained in any facility unless he is under imminent danger of serious physical injury. See § 1915(g). Finally, Kramer has not shown “ exceptio nal circumstances ” warrantin g the appointment of counsel. See Ulmer v. Chancellor , 691 F.2d 2 09, 212 (5th Cir. 1982) . Accordingly, we deny his motion for the appointment of counsel. M OTION S DENIED; APPEAL DISMISSED; SANCTION BAR IMPOSED

. Case: 14-50472 Document: 00513446011 Page: 2 Date Filed: 03/31/2016