alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**EXHIBIT 12(c)**

 

#### **PACCARand Subsidiaries**

 

**COMPUTATION OF RATIO OF EARNINGS TO FIXED CHARGES**

 

**PURSUANT TO SEC REPORTING REQUIREMENTS**

(Millions of Dollars)

 
| ** **                                         | ** ** | **Nine Months Ended** | ** **  |
|----------------------------------------------------|------------|---------------------------------|-------------|
| ** **                                         | ** ** | **September 30**           | ** **  |
| ** **                                         |       | **2007**                        | ** **  | **2006** |   |
| FIXED CHARGES                                      |       |                            |        |   |   |
| Interest expense  - PACCAR and Subsidiaries (1)    | ** ** | **$**                           | **282.7**   |   | $ | 216.7 |   |
| Portion of  rentals deemed interest                | ** ** | **13.0**                        |        | 13.5 |   |
|                                               |       |                            |        |   |   |
| TOTAL FIXED  CHARGES                               | ** ** | **$**                           | **295.7**   |   | $ | 230.2 |   |
|                                               |       |                            |        |   |   |
| EARNINGS                                           |       |                            |        |   |   |
| Income before  taxes - PACCAR and Subsidiaries (2) | ** ** | **$**                           | **1,392.8** |   | $ | 1,619.3 |   |
| Fixed charges                                      | ** ** | **295.7**                       |        | 230.2 |   |
|                                               |       |                            |        |   |   |
| EARNINGS AS  DEFINED                               | ** ** | **$**                           | **1,688.5** |   | $ | 1,849.5 |   |
|                                               |       |                            |        |   |   |
| RATIO OF  EARNINGS TO FIXED CHARGES                | ** ** | **5.71X**                       |        | 8.03X |   |

 

----

(1)  Exclusive of interest, if any, paid toPACCAR.

 

(2)  Includes before tax earnings of wholly ownedsubsidiaries.

 

----
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY HIGH

 152

 170

 322

 419

 929

 2,231

 2,152

 3,101

 5,192

 4,888

 6,451

 5,733

 4,829

 3,971

 3,409

 3,454

 3,917

 5,355

 6,215

 6,959

 7,477

 8,060

 9,221

 8,108

 9,006

 7,544

 8,159

 6,282

 6,319

 5,280

 6,548

 133

 136

 144

 149

 168

 191

 208

 234

 274

 421

 441

 406

 443

 601

 614

 588

 694

 862

 889

 940

 912

 1,033

 1,139

 1,262

 1,680

 1,929

 1,667

 1,590

 1,627

 1,320

 1,625

 142

 146

 164

 181

 323

 500

 606

 839

 1,403

 1,840

 1,994

 2,071

 1,673

 1,756

 1,736

 1,542

 1,582

 1,955

 2,412

 2,709

 3,150

 3,692

 4,039

 4,238

 4,496

 4,405

 4,254

 3,883

 3,774

 3,333

 3,165

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

JULY 2006 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: August 3, 2006

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

PITTSBURG TOP ON THE SACRAMENTO RIVER
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY ELEV

 122.78

 123.38

 122.97

 123.08

 123.16

 123.11

 122.06

 122.30

 123.46

 123.82

 123.88

 123.49

 123.45

 123.40

 122.93

 123.07

 122.63

 122.67

 123.02

 123.23

 122.92

 122.18

 122.22

 122.31

 122.45

 121.86

 122.11

 121.84

 121.87

 122.37

 122.41

 7,692

 7,970

 7,778

 7,829

 7,866

 7,843

 7,368

 7,476

 8,007

 8,176

 8,205

 8,021

 8,003

 7,979

 7,760

 7,824

 7,625

 7,643

 7,800

 7,899

 7,755

 7,422

 7,440

 7,481

 7,544

 7,282

 7,391

 7,274

 7,286

 7,508

 7,526

STORAGE

+130

+278

-192

+51

+37

-23

-475

+108

+531

+169

+29

-184

-18

-24

-219

+64

-199

+18

+157

+99

-144

-333

+18

+41

+63

-262

+109

-117

+12

+222

+18

CHANGE

996

1,075

828

958

960

924

698

995

1,211

1,028

957

835

919

926

822

968

837

950

1,029

990

902

799

936

944

959

820

997

890

953

1,062

941

INFLOW

 860

 864

 854

 855

 850

 846

 847

 850

 853

 853

 852

 847

 858

 867

 862

 865

 867

 866

 865

 854

 865

 857

 855

 853

 849

 851

 842

 848

 845

 848

 831

POWER

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

SPILL

 70

 70

 70

 70

 70

 70

 70

 70

 70

 70

 70

 70

 70

 70

 70

 70

 70

 70

 70

 70

 70

 70

 70

 70

 70

 70

 70

 70

 70

 70

 70

HATCHERY

 0

 1

 1

 0

 1

 0

 0

 1

 0

 0

 0

 1

 0

 1

 0

 1

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 1

 1

 0

 1

 2

 2

 1

C.F.S.

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

JANUARY 2015 LAKE NATOMA DAILY OPERATIONS RUN DATE: December 15, 2015

IN LAKE

EVAP

C.F.S.

COMPUTED*

ACRE-FEET

RELEASE - C.F.S.

TOTALS -36 29,109 26,479 0 2,170 15

ACRE-FEET -36 57,738 52,521 0 4,304 30

COMMENTS:

* COMPUTED INFLOW IS THE SUM OF CHANGE IN STORAGE, RELEASES AND EVAPORATION.

SUMMARY

RELEASES (ACRE-FEET)

POWER 52,521

SPILL 0

FOLSOM SOUTH CANAL

HATCHERY

 916

 4,304

 7,562

FOLSOM

SOUTH 

CANAL

 0

 0

 0

 7

 20

 20

 20

 20

 20

 20

 20

 10

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 5

 15

 16

 40

 40

 2

 0

 7

 30

 30

 30

 30

 30

 30

 462

 916

(1)

(1) INCHES OF EVAPORATION TAKEN FROM FOLSOM PAN.

RELEASES (ACRE-FEET)

TOTAL 57,741

Table 12
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY HIGH

 18,355

 20,624

 21,510

 21,293

 21,078

 19,806

 21,214

 20,107

 18,912

 17,304

 17,088

 18,714

 20,522

 19,348

 16,866

 14,740

 11,886

 9,797

 10,634

 9,238

 8,947

 8,819

 9,357

 7,146

 4,775

 2,587

 1,553

 1,001

 1,175

 1,081

 1,122

 10,674

 11,055

 11,136

 10,988

 10,357

 10,205

 10,191

 9,094

 10,331

 9,529

 8,921

 10,178

 11,902

 10,180

 8,381

 4,614

 3,968

 3,429

 2,426

 2,314

 1,773

 1,710

 1,639

 1,877

 1,127

 779

 687

 547

 450

 420

 489

 13,740

 14,763

 15,473

 15,496

 15,063

 14,833

 15,399

 14,889

 15,049

 14,084

 13,487

 14,614

 16,011

 14,660

 12,617

 10,294

 7,553

 5,840

 5,715

 5,068

 4,595

 4,404

 5,049

 4,365

 2,651

 1,302

 998

 766

 678

 580

 601

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

DECEMBER 2021 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: January 27, 2022

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

PITTSBURG BOTTOM ON THE SACRAMENTO RIVER
#### Edward T. Staples et al. v. Arlington State Bank.

Filed April 21, 1898.

No. 8035.

Continuance: Exception to Ruling: Review. To review an order denying a continuance it is necessary to take an exception to 'the ruling in the trial court.

Error from the district court of Washington county. Tried below before Keysor, J.

*Affirmed.*

*Davis & Howell,*for plaintiffs in error.

*W. S. Cook*and *Frick & Dolezal, contra.*

Irvine, C.

The plaintiffs in error complain in their briefs of only-one ruling of the district court the overruling of an. application for a continuance. No exception was taken to the order complained of and it cannot, therefore, be reviewed. *(Coad v. Home Cattle Co., 32*Neb. 761.)

Affirmed.
Electrical Conductivity, UMHOS

Day High Low Mean

1 581 420 473

2 563 463 504

3 490 438 462

4 477 443 459

5 449 403 427

6 422 309 353

7 343 265 311

8 320 230 292

9 323 235 291

10 304 269 285

11 349 284 305

12 384 281 346

13 359 288 320

14 366 338 355

15 396 359 378

16 427 383 404

17 433 296 348

18 326 265 283

19 274 240 258

20 300 254 272

21 304 250 272

22 274 234 257

23 298 251 274

24 256 233 244

25 243 220 230

26 272 232 250

27 309 253 286

28 258 232 246

29 0 0 0

30 0 0 0

31 287 231 263

COMMENT(S):

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

Historical Archive and Report Database

Delta Mendota Canal At Check 13 O'Neill

Period: March 2023 Run Date: 4/7/2023
SUPPLEMENTAL STATEMENT TO SCHEDULES

ITEM 1 - NEWTEK VEHCILE LIENS:

Newtek Small Business Finance, LLC has a perfected, first priority security interest in

the following Vehicles [Listed in Schedule A/B – Item 47] with respect to Secured Claim 2.24:

Vehicle 47.22

Vehicle 47.25

Vehicle 47.26

Vehicle 47.28

Vehicle 47.29

Vehicle 47.30

Vehicle 47.31

Vehicle 47.32

Vehicle 47.34

Vehicle 47.35

Vehicle 47.36

Vehicle 47.37

Vehicle 47.38

Vehicle 47.39

Vehicle 47.40

Vehicle 47.41

Vehicle 47.42

Vehicle 47.43

Vehicle 47.44

Vehicle 47.45

Vehicle 47.46

Case 21-10809-BFK Doc 35-1 Filed 05/18/21 Entered 05/18/21 15:10:36 Desc

Exhibit(s) Supplemental Statement Page 1 of 2
ITEM 2 – LIENS AGAINST ACCOUNTS RECEIVABLE:

Multiple creditors hold liens against the Accounts Receivable of the Debtor [Listed in 

Schedule A/B – Items 11(a) and (b)]. In order of priority, these creditors are:

First, Newtek Small Business Finance, LLC with respect to Secured Claim 2.24; 

Second, Corporation Service Company [as Representative] with respect to

Secured Claim 2.15;

Third, Corporation Service Company [as Representative] with respect to Secured 

Claim 2.16;

Fourth, Corporation Service Company [as Representative] with respect to Secured 

Claim 2.17;

Fifth, Corporation Service Company [as Representative] with respect to Secured 

Claim 2.18;

Sixth, Corporation Service Company [as Representative] with respect to Secured 

Claim 2.19;

Seventh, Corporation Service Company [as Representative] with respect to 

Secured Claim 2.20;

Eighth, S&P Financial Services, Inc. with respect to Secured Claim 2.25;

Eighth, MBFMPO with respect to Secured Claim 2.23;

Ninth, Accel Capital with respect to Secured Claim 2.1;

Tenth, Fundbox with respect to Secured Claim 2.21;

Eleventh, US Small Business Administration [PPP Loan [First Round] with 

respect to Secured Claim 2.28; and

Twelfth, the US Small Business Administration [PPP Loan [Second Round] with 

respect to Secured Claim 2.29.

Case 21-10809-BFK Doc 35-1 Filed 05/18/21 Entered 05/18/21 15:10:36 Desc

Exhibit(s) Supplemental Statement Page 2 of 2
# C_2012031EN.01001101.xml

| 4.2.2012 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 31/11 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

4.2.2012

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 31/11

---

Information communicated by Member States regarding State aid granted under Commission Regulation (EC) No 1857/2006 on the application of Articles 87 and 88 of the Treaty to State aid to small and medium-sized enterprises active in the production of agricultural products and amending Regulation (EC) No 70/2001

2012/C 31/07

Aid No: SA.34213 (12/XA)

Member State: Germany

Region: Deutschland

Title of aid scheme or name of company receiving an individual aid: Bund: Effizienter Energieeinsatz im Gartenbau — Aufbau einer Informationsplattform zur Förderung des effizienten Energieeinsatzes im Gartenbau als Zusatzmodul des Gartenbau-Informationssystems hortigate zur Nutzung durch die Gartenbaubranche

612-40306/0002

Legal basis: Die Beihilfe wird per Änderungsbescheid (AZ: BLE-514-06.01-08SV001) vom 6. Dezember 2011 auf Grundlage der Bundeshaushaltsordnung gewährt.

Annual expenditure planned under the scheme or overall amount of individual aid granted to the company: Annual overall amount of the budget planned under the scheme: EUR 0,10 million

Maximum aid intensity: 100 %

Date of implementation: —

Duration of scheme or individual aid award: 26 January 2012-31 December 2012

Objective of aid: Technical support (Article 15 of Regulation (EC) No 1857/2006)

Sector(s) concerned: Agriculture, forestry and fishing

Name and address of the granting authority:

| Bundesanstalt für Landwirtschaft und Ernährung (BLE) |
| --- |
| Ref. 514 — Projektträger Agrarforschung |
| 53168 Bonn |
| DEUTSCHLAND |

Bundesanstalt für Landwirtschaft und Ernährung (BLE)

Ref. 514 — Projektträger Agrarforschung

53168 Bonn

DEUTSCHLAND

Website: http://www.ble.de/SharedDocs/Downloads/04_Forschungsfoerderung/HortigateZusatzmodul_Projektverlaengerung2.html?nn=2303696

Other information: —

---
Order filed, November 20, 2017

.

In The 

## Court of Appeals For The 

## First District of Texas

____________ NO. 01

- 17

- 00710

- CV
SUDERMAN CONTRACTING STEVEDORES, INC. AND GEORGE ALDRIDGE , Appellant

V.

V ICTOR FERRUFINO , Appellee

On Appeal from the 215th District Court

Harris County, Texas Trial Court Case 2016

- 13498



### ORDER
The reporter’s record in this case was due 10/17/2017

. See Tex. R. App. P. 35.1.
On 10/20/2017 , this court granted the court reporter an extension to file the record within 30 days . The record has not been filed with the court. Because the reporter’s record has not been filed timely, we issue the following order.

We order Cantrece Addison
, the official (or substitute) court reporter, to f ile the record in this appeal , if any, within 30 day of the date of this order

.No further extension will be entertained absent exceptional circumstances. The

trial and appellate courts are jointly responsible for ensuring that the appellate record is timely filed. Se e Tex. R. App. P. 35.3(c). If the reporter does not timely file the record as ordered, we will issue an order directing the trial court to conduct a hearing to
determine the reason for the failure to file the record.

PER CURIAM
§ 219.31 Evidence of a valid ceremonial marriage. ( a ) *Preferred evidence.* Preferred evidence of a ceremonial marriage is— ( 1 ) A copy of the public record of the marriage, certified by the custodian of the record or by a Board employee;
( 2 ) A copy of a church record of the marriage certified by the custodian of the record or by a Board employee; or
( 3 ) The original certificate of marriage.
( b ) *Other evidence of a ceremonial marriage.* If preferred evidence of a ceremonial marriage cannot be obtained, the applicant must state the reason therefor in writing and submit either— ( 1 ) A sworn statement of the clergyman or official who performed the marriage ceremony; or
( 2 ) Other convincing evidence, such as the sworn statements of at least two persons who have direct knowledge of the marriage, preferably eyewitnesses to the marriage ceremony.
(Approved by the Office of Management and Budget under control number 3220-0140)
- Cover page
- Page 1 - Hi! My name is Sammy Soil. I am a tiny piece of soil.
- Page 2 - There are billions of others like me in all shapes and sizes. You step on us everyday.
- Page 3 - I live on Farmer Brown's farm. Farmer Brown is a good farmer. I am happy to live on a conservation farm.
- Page 4 - Come along, my wildlife friends, and help me plant these baby trees, so you can have homes, food, and clean air.
- Page 5 - I'm going to visit my uncle who lives on Farmer Smith's farm. Farmer Smith is not a good conservation farmer. 
- Page 6 - Oh, it's starting to rain. I must run for cover. There is no cover on Farmer Smith's farm. The grass is too short. I cannot hide from rain.
- Page 7 - Look! My other soil friends are washing down the river. The river is choking from the sediment they cause.
- Page 8 - Where am I? I must have been carried away by a big gully on Farmer Smith's farm. This water is running very fast and I am being carried very far away.
- Page 9 - At least the river has stopped. I am afraid. Will I ever get back home?
- Page 10 - Oh my, I am at the beach. A little boy is putting me into his pail. His name is Johnny. He is taking me to his grandfather's.
- Page 11 - We have traveled a long way. I wonder where Johnny's grandfather lives?
- Page 12 - We're here! Johnny's grandfather is Farmer Brown. I'm so happy! Look! Farmer Smith has changed his farm. He has become a conservation farmer.
- Page 13 - Hooray! I'll never be carried so far away from home again.
- Page 14 - Look! The trees we planned are all grown up. There are lots of things we can make from trees.
- Page 15 - The trees help keep my soil friends from clogging the river. Look how clear it is!
- Page 16 - Now all my friends and I can do what we are supposed to do. We can help to grow trees and plants. best of all, we can help grow food that makes you grow.
- Back Cover page - Provided by Soil Water Missippi Commission and Conservation
**Exhibit 32.1**

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO**

**18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906**

**OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

I,Marc D. Grodman, Chief Executive Officer of Bio-Reference Laboratories, Inc.(the “Company”), do hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, asadopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

(a)                                  the Annual Report on Form 10-K of theCompany for the fiscal year ended October, 31 2005, which this certificationaccompanies (the “Periodic Report”), fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) ofthe Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

(b)                                 based on my knowledge, the informationcontained in the Periodic Report fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

| Dated:  January 12, 2006 |                                   |
|-------------------------------|----------------------------------------|
|                          | /S/ Marc D. Grodman                    |   |
|                          | Marc  D. Grodman                       |
|                          | Chief  Executive Officer               |
|                          | Bio-Reference  Laboratories, Inc. |

 

1

----
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY HIGH

 18,706

 19,585

 19,016

 20,420

 18,280

 18,703

 20,749

 22,023

 20,874

 16,145

 16,169

 17,133

 18,557

 18,201

 0

 12,909

 21,624

 22,022

 21,720

 20,470

 19,809

 18,071

 17,231

 17,291

 19,185

 20,388

 21,388

 21,822

 22,286

 22,634

 22,602

 5,005

 4,946

 3,304

 4,127

 2,643

 2,173

 4,024

 4,973

 5,189

 4,180

 4,864

 5,524

 6,284

 5,795

 0

 9,914

 4,677

 4,299

 4,436

 4,253

 3,912

 4,223

 4,765

 6,014

 8,162

 8,517

 8,226

 8,732

 8,466

 7,133

 6,296

 11,392

 11,364

 11,126

 11,521

 9,953

 9,914

 11,789

 13,445

 13,291

 11,141

 11,266

 10,978

 11,108

 11,853

 0

 11,496

 12,639

 12,670

 12,539

 12,099

 11,667

 11,130

 11,377

 12,574

 13,122

 13,246

 14,156

 14,689

 14,680

 14,260

 14,045

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

MAY 2007 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: June 5, 2007

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

PORT CHICAGO BOTTOM IN SUISUN BAY
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

DAY ELEV

 1,012.05

 1,012.62

 1,013.16

 1,013.75

 1,014.30

 1,014.76

 1,015.05

 1,015.48

 1,015.87

 1,016.35

 1,016.73

 1,017.13

 1,017.68

 1,017.98

 1,018.36

 1,018.68

 1,019.23

 1,019.44

 1,020.00

 1,020.24

 1,020.46

 1,020.56

 1,020.72

 1,020.93

 1,021.11

 1,021.21

 1,021.39

 1,021.58

 1,021.60

 1,021.58

 1,584.4

 1,589.9

 1,595.1

 1,600.8

 1,606.1

 1,610.6

 1,613.4

 1,617.6

 1,621.4

 1,626.1

 1,629.8

 1,633.7

 1,639.1

 1,642.0

 1,645.8

 1,648.9

 1,654.3

 1,656.4

 1,661.9

 1,664.3

 1,666.5

 1,667.5

 1,669.1

 1,671.1

 1,672.9

 1,673.9

 1,675.7

 1,677.6

 1,677.8

 1,677.6

STORAGE

+6.0

+5.5

+5.2

+5.7

+5.3

+4.5

+2.8

+4.2

+3.8

+4.7

+3.7

+3.9

+5.4

+2.9

+3.7

+3.1

+5.4

+2.1

+5.5

+2.4

+2.2

+1.0

+1.6

+2.1

+1.8

+1.0

+1.8

+1.9

+0.2

-0.2

CHANGE

3,107

2,846

2,672

2,931

2,741

3,016

3,274

3,485

3,238

3,051

2,866

2,902

2,799

2,638

2,745

2,421

2,818

2,368

4,848

2,395

2,568

2,272

2,021

2,148

2,215

2,053

2,460

2,427

2,597

2,511

INFLOW

 26

 26

 26

 26

 26

 732

 1,820

 1,337

 1,311

 646

 960

 881

 27

 1,101

 803

 792

 24

 1,258

 2,001

 1,138

 1,391

 1,618

 1,154

 1,073

 1,263

 1,493

 1,493

 1,429

 2,465

 2,550

POWER

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

SPILL

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

OUTLET

 34

 53

 22

 31

 31

 35

 35

 38

 13

 44

 35

 48

 54

 54

 57

 41

 61

 64

 58

 58

 77

 154

 67

 26

 51

 58

 64

 45

 32

 61

C.F.S.

 .11

 .17

 .07

 .10

 .10

 .11

 .11

 .12

 .04

 .14

 .11

 .15

 .17

 .17

 .18

 .13

 .19

 .20

 .18

 .18

 .24

 .48

 .21

 .08

 .16

 .18

 .20

 .14

 .10

 .19

INCHES

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .35

 .00

 .00

 .31

 .35

 .61

 .01

 .01

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .16

 .13

 .00

PRECIP

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

APRIL 2005 NEW MELONES LAKE DAILY OPERATIONS RUN DATE: October 26, 2005

IN LAKE

EVAPORATION

INCHES

C.F.S.

COMPUTED*

1000 ACRE-FEET

RELEASE - C.F.S.

TOTALS +99.2 82,433 30,890 0 0 1,501 4.71 1.93

ACRE-FEET +99,200 163,506 61,270 0 0 2,977

COMMENTS:

SUMMARY

RELEASE (ACRE-FEET)

POWER 61,270

SPILL 0

OUTLET

TOTAL

 0

 61,270

PRECIPITATION

THIS MONTH =

TO DATE =

 1.93

JULY 1, 2004 37.06

 1,578.4

Table 13
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

DAY HIGH

 351

 1,042

 1,310

 1,886

 1,541

 1,514

 1,535

 1,487

 1,419

 976

 775

 617

 656

 618

 573

 558

 902

 579

 356

 283

 220

 193

 179

 175

 171

 178

 191

 244

 218

 245

 169

 195

 197

 254

 257

 289

 270

 283

 282

 265

 270

 261

 268

 256

 253

 230

 229

 220

 200

 182

 165

 165

 161

 154

 160

 163

 168

 176

 177

 173

 206

 418

 560

 676

 551

 552

 503

 555

 498

 464

 438

 390

 400

 386

 358

 330

 399

 291

 231

 207

 183

 175

 173

 167

 165

 169

 173

 193

 194

 195

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

APRIL 2000 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: May 2, 2000

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

PITTSBURG TOP ON THE SACRAMENTO RIVER
Note for the Docket:

Federal Land Managers Consultation On November 20, 2012, EPA held a conference call with the participants listed below to discuss our upcoming partial approval and partial disapproval of Washington's Regional Haze SIP and EPA's FIP for Tesoro and Intalco. The FLM participants went through their comments and questions on the draft Federal Register Notice we provided them.

This formal call was in follow

- up to the many informal preliminary staff and
management

- level discussions on this action.

Participants on November 20 conference call:

S teve Body, EPA Dave Bray, EPA Todd Hawes, EPA Juliane Matthews, EPA Debra Suzuki, EPA Pat Brewer, NPS Tonnie Cummings, NPS Rick Graw, USFS Don Shepherd, NPS