alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 31.2
                                  CERTIFICATION

I, Grant Atkins, certify that:

1. I have  reviewed  this Form 10-KSB for the period ended  December 31, 2005 of
Morgan Creek Energy Corp.;

2.  Based on my  knowledge,  this  annual  report  does not  contain  any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact  necessary to make
the statements made, in light of the  circumstances  under which such statements
were made,  not  misleading  with  respect to the period  covered by this annual
report;

3.  Based  on my  knowledge,  the  financial  statements,  and  other  financial
information  included  in this annual  report,  fairly  present in all  material
respects the financial  condition,  results of operations  and cash flows of the
registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this annual report;

4.  The  registrant's  other  certifying  officers  and  I are  responsible  for
establishing and maintaining  disclosure  controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and have:

     a)   designed  such  disclosure  controls  and  procedures  to ensure  that
          material  information  relating  to  the  registrant,   including  its
          consolidated subsidiaries,  is made known to us by others within those
          entities,  particularly  during the period in which this annual report
          is being prepared;

     b)   evaluated the  effectiveness of the registrant's  disclosure  controls
          and procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of
          this annual report (the "Evaluation Date"); and

     c)   presented   in  this   annual   report  our   conclusions   about  the
          effectiveness  of the disclosure  controls and procedures based on our
          evaluation as of the Evaluation Date;

5. The registrant's other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our
most recent evaluation,  to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of
registrant's   board  of  directors  (or  persons   performing   the  equivalent
functions):

     a)   all  significant  deficiencies  in the design or operation of internal
          controls  which could  adversely  affect the  registrant's  ability to
          record,  process,   summarize  and  report  financial  data  and  have
          identified for the  registrant's  auditors any material  weaknesses in
          internal controls; and

     b)   any fraud, whether or not material,  that involves management or other
          employees who have a  significant  role in the  registrant's  internal
          controls; and

6. The  registrant's  other  certifying  officers  and I have  indicated in this
annual report whether or not there were significant changes in internal controls
or in other factors that could significantly affect internal controls subsequent
to the date of our most recent evaluation, including any corrective actions with
regard to significant deficiencies and material weaknesses.

Date: March 29, 2006
/s/ Grant Atkins
--------------------------
By: Grant Atkins, Treasurer/Chief
Financial Officer/Secretary
#### § 255.7 Recovery by deduction in computation of death benefit.

In computing the residual lump sum provided for in part 234, subpart D, of this chapter, the Board shall include in the benefits to be deducted from the applicable percentages of the aggregate compensation provided for in that part all overpayments, whether waived under § 255.10 of this part or otherwise not recovered, that were paid to the employee or to his or her spouse or to his or her survivors with respect to the employee's employment.
(No. 74-CC-74

#### Moore Business Forms, Inc., Claimant, *vs.*State of Illinois, Department of Finance, Respondent.

*Opinion filed November 13, 1973.*

Moore Business Forms, Inc., Claimant, pro se.

William J. Scott, Attorney General; Saul R. Wexler, Assistant Attorney General, for Respondent.

Per Curiam.
EXHIBIT 11
                    BellSouth Corporation
              Computation of Earnings Per Share

                 For the Three Month    For the Six Month
                    Period Ended           Period Ended
                      June 30,               June 30,
                   1998       1997       1998        1997
Basic Earnings Per Common Share:
                                                  
Net Income      $   818    $   654    $ 1,710     $ 1,347
                                                  
Weighted                                          
average shares                                    
Outstanding         989        992        990         992
                                                  
Earnings Per                                      
Common Share    $   .83    $   .66    $  1.73     $  1.36
                                                  
                                                  EXHIBIT 11
                    BellSouth Corporation
        Computation of Earnings Per Share (continued)
                              
                 For the Three Month    For the Six Month
                    Period Ended           Period Ended
                      June 30,               June 30,
                   1998       1997       1998        1997
Diluted Earnings Per Common Share:
                                                  
Net Income      $   818    $   654    $ 1,710     $ 1,347
                                                  
Weighted                                          
average shares                                    
Outstanding         989        992        990         992
                                                  
Incremental                                       
shares from                                       
Assumed                                           
exercise of                                       
stock options                                     
and payment of                                    
performance                                       
share awards          6          2          6           2
                                                  
Total Shares        995        994        996         994
                                                  
Earnings Per                                      
Common Share    $   .82    $   .66    $  1.72     $  1.36
§ 30.902 How will OWCP calculate the amount of the award of impairment benefits that is payable under Part E? ( a ) OWCP will multiply the percentage points of the impairment rating by $2,500 to calculate the amount of the award.
( b ) An employee's impairment rating may be comprised of multiple impairments of organs and body functions due to multiple covered illnesses. If an impairment award is payable based on a whole person impairment rating in which at least one of the impairments is subject to a reduction under §§ 30.505(b) and/or 30.626, OWCP will reduce the impairment award proportionately.
[84 FR 3060, Feb. 8, 2019]
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY ELEV

 568.35

 568.68

 569.02

 569.02

 569.09

 569.16

 569.25

 569.32

 569.48

 569.39

 569.35

 569.59

 569.84

 569.93

 570.14

 570.41

 570.57

 570.72

 570.64

 570.66

 570.64

 570.44

 570.19

 569.76

 569.14

 568.52

 567.88

 567.35

 566.87

 566.73

 566.16

 474.4

 476.0

 477.6

 477.6

 477.9

 478.2

 478.6

 479.0

 479.7

 479.3

 479.1

 480.2

 481.4

 481.8

 482.8

 484.1

 484.8

 485.5

 485.2

 485.3

 485.2

 484.2

 483.0

 481.0

 478.1

 475.2

 472.2

 469.8

 467.6

 466.9

 464.3

STORAGE

+1.9

+1.5

+1.6

+0.0

+0.3

+0.3

+0.4

+0.3

+0.8

-0.4

-0.2

+1.1

+1.2

+0.4

+1.0

+1.3

+0.8

+0.7

-0.4

+0.1

-0.1

-0.9

-1.2

-2.0

-2.9

-2.9

-3.0

-2.5

-2.2

-0.6

-2.6

CHANGE

2,882

2,772

3,017

2,405

2,641

2,600

2,514

2,204

2,428

2,002

2,113

2,710

2,731

2,243

2,357

2,500

2,416

2,580

2,118

2,366

2,412

2,144

2,229

2,288

2,211

2,285

2,237

2,291

2,000

2,689

2,107

INFLOW

 507

 490

 534

 579

 583

 589

 583

 558

 503

 508

 509

 481

 487

 497

 497

 435

 407

 461

 444

 422

 399

 400

 411

 448

 499

 482

 455

 431

 328

 329

 404

MADERA

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

SPILL

 1,143

 1,247

 1,437

 1,557

 1,629

 1,592

 1,445

 1,210

 1,293

 1,457

 1,441

 1,399

 1,399

 1,293

 1,087

 1,167

 1,367

 1,504

 1,604

 1,646

 1,801

 1,956

 2,142

 2,596

 2,921

 3,001

 3,000

 2,829

 2,521

 2,397

 2,751

FRIANT-KERN

 57

 48

 33

 56

 51

 44

 64

 62

 44

 41

 48

 52

 44

 30

 65

 47

 52

 49

 49

 40

 49

 52

 58

 52

 47

 42

 48

 36

 37

 54

 42

C.F.S.

 .38

 .32

 .22

 .37

 .34

 .29

 .42

 .41

 .29

 .27

 .32

 .34

 .29

 .20

 .43

 .31

 .34

 .32

 .32

 .26

 .32

 .34

 .38

 .34

 .31

 .28

 .32

 .24

 .25

 .36

 .28

INCHES

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .80

 .00

 .00

 .00

PRECIP

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

MAY 2004 MILLERTON LAKE DAILY OPERATIONS RUN DATE: June 18, 2004

IN LAKE

EVAPORATION

INCHES

C.F.S.

COMPUTED*

1000 ACRE-FEET

RELEASE - C.F.S. 

TOTALS -8.2 74,492 14,660 55,832 0 1,493 9.86 .80

ACRE-FEET -8,229 147,755 29,078 110,743 0 2,961

COMMENTS:

* COMPUTED INFLOW IS THE SUM OF CHANGE IN STORAGE, RELEASES, PUMPING AND EVAPORATION.

SUMMARY

RELEASE (ACRE-FEET)

CANALS

FRIANT-KERN

MADERA

 110,743

 29,078 153,021

PRECIPITATION

THIS MONTH =

JULY 1, 2003 TO DATE = 10.47

 472.5

 13,200 0.80

CANALS

AT FRIANT

TOTAL RELEASES

OUTLET

 212

 212

 213

 213

 213

 209

 209

 209

 209

 209

 209

 210

 210

 210

 211

 211

 211

 211

 211

 211

 210

 210

 210

 210

 210

 220

 236

 234

 234

 234

 234

RIVER

 6,655

 13,200

RIVER

Table 15
Exhibit 32.2

                     Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
                             As Adopted Pursuant to Section 906
                            Of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

         In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of Presidential
     Realty Corporation (the "Company") for the period ending March 31, 2004, as
     filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
     "Report"), I, Thomas Viertel, Chief Financial Officer of the Company,
     certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section
     906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:

       (1)   the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)or
             15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934: and

       (2)   the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
             material respects, the financial condition and the results of
             operations of the Company.



                                         Presidential Realty Corporation


                                                 By:/s/ Thomas Viertel
                                                    ----------------------
                                                    Thomas Viertel
                                                    Chief Financial Officer




         Date: May 10, 2004
# C_2012023EN.01001101.xml

| 28.1.2012 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 23/11 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

28.1.2012

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 23/11

---

Communication from the Commission relating to the available quantity for the May 2012 subperiod in the framework of certain quotas opened by the European Union for products in the rice sector

2012/C 23/05

Commission Regulation (EU) No 1274/2009 opened tariff quotas for the import of rice originating in the overseas countries and territories (OCT) (1). No import licence applications have been submitted during the first seven days of January 2012 for the quotas with order numbers 09.4189 and 09.4190.

1

In accordance with the second sentence of Article 7(4) of Commission Regulation (EC) No 1301/2006 (2), the quantities for which applications are not submitted are to be added to the following subperiod.

2

In accordance with the second subparagraph of Article 1(5) of Commission Regulation (EU) No 1274/2009 quantities available in the following subperiod are communicated by the Commission before the 25th day of the last month of a given subperiod.

As a result, the total available quantity for the May 2012 subperiod under the quotas with order numbers 09.4189 and 09.4190 as referred to in Regulation (EU) No 1274/2009 are set out in the Annex to this communication.

---

(1)  OJ L 344, 23.12.2009, p. 3.

1

(2)  OJ L 238, 1.9.2006, p. 13.

2

---

ANNEX

Quantities available for the following subperiod under Regulation (EU) No 1274/2009

| Origin | Order number | Import licence applications introduced for the January 2012 subperiod | Total available quantity for the May 2012 subperiod (in kg) |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Netherlands Antilles and Aruba | 09.4189 | (1) | 16 667 000 |
| Least developed OCTs | 09.4190 | (1) | 6 667 000 |

Origin

Order number

Import licence applications introduced for the January 2012 subperiod

Total available quantity for the May 2012 subperiod (in kg)

Netherlands Antilles and Aruba

09.4189

(1)

16 667 000

Least developed OCTs

09.4190

(1)

6 667 000

---

(1)  No allocation coefficient for this subperiod: no licence applications were sent to the Commission.

---
---

Exhibit 99.10

March 27, 2012

CONSENT OF GUILLERMO PAREJA

United States Securities and Exchange Commission

Gentlemen:

In connection with Silver Wheaton Corp.s (the Company)
Annual Report on Form 40-F for the year ended December 31, 2011 (the Annual
Report), I, Guillermo Pareja, Ph.D., P.Geo, Manager Mineral Resources, Goldcorp
Inc., hereby consent to the inclusion in, or incorporation by reference into,
the Annual Report and the Companys Registration Statements on Form S-8 (File
No. 333-128128) and Form F-10 (File No. 333-167567), of the following:

| | 1. | Resource estimates of the Peñasquito Operation;
  and                                                                                                                         
| | -- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| | 2. | Technical report dated December 31, 2010, entitled
      Penasquito Polymetallic Operation, Zacatecas State, Mexico NI 43-101
      Technical Reportfor Silver Wheaton Corp.

Yours truly,

/s/ Guillermo Pareja

Guillermo Pareja,
Ph.D., P.Geo Manager Mineral Resources, Goldcorp Inc.

---
#### Johnnie R. PROPES, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. CITY MANAGER; Rodney Noles, Defendants-Appellees.

No. 04-41267.

Conference Calendar.

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.

Decided Feb. 23, 2006.

Johnnie R. Propes, Teague, TX, for Plaintiff-Appellant.

Before GARZA, DENNIS, and PRADO, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: *

Johnnie R. Propes, Texas state prisoner # 1178904, appeals the district court’s dis*647missal with prejudice of his pro se, in forma pauperis, 42 U.S.C. § 1983 civil rights complaint as frivolous and for failure to state a claim. Propes alleged that Plano, Texas, city officials conspired to discriminate against him on the basis of his race by issuing citations to him for violating city ordinances based on the mistaken belief that he owned land which he, in fact, did not own. He claimed that Noles, an uncertified building inspector, had engaged in the wanton prosecution of code violations on residences owned by African-Americans.

We review a dismissal as frivolous under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)(i) for an abuse of discretion. *Taylor v. Johnson,*257 F.3d 470, 472 (5th Cir.2001). We review a dismissal for failure to state a claim upon which relief may be granted *de novo. Hart v. Hairston,*343 F.3d 762, 763-64 (5th Cir.2003); § 1915(e)(2)(B)(ii).

Propes’s eonclusory allegations of a race-based conspiracy are insufficient to support a viable § 1983 claim. *See Brinkmann v. Johnston,*793 F.2d 111, 113 (5th Cir.1986). Nor has Propes demonstrated that either the citations or the warrants issued for his arrest were motivated by discriminatory animus. *See Coleman v. Houston Indep. Sch. Dist.,*113 F.3d 528, 533 (5th Cir.1997). Accordingly, Propes’s appeal lacks an arguable basis in law and fact and is frivolous. *See Berry v. Brady,*192 F.3d 504, 507 (5th Cir.1999). Because the appeal is frivolous it is dismissed. *See*5th Cir. R. 42.2.

In *Propes v. Dretke,*130 Fed.Appx. 654 (5th Cir.2005), we imposed the 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g) bar against Propes. We warn Propes that further filing of frivolous complaints or pleadings may result in additional sanctions against him.

Propes’s motion for the appointment of counsel on appeal is denied.

APPEAL DISMISSED AS FRIVOLOUS; MOTION DENIED; SANCTION WARNING ISSUED.

*

 Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be *647published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.
Bureau of Labor Statistics

Series Id:

Series title:

Labor force status:

Type of data:

Age:

Years:

Year Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec

2001 7995 8013 7974 7973 7973 7962 8023 8010 8027 8035 8127 8125

2002 8141 8128 8137 8149 8121 8091 8084 8090 8087 8064 8057 8036

2003 8481 8470 8439 8414 8516 8553 8587 8576 8612 8644 8764 8676

2004 8630 8668 8595 8717 8589 8482 8384 8207 8452 8620 8792 8756

2005 8866 8866 8690 8670 8573 8523 8531 8595 8870 8951 9109 9094

2006 8971 9099 9016 8969 9012 8916 8826 8938 9255 9419 9329 9314

2007 9256 9151 9163 9245 9291 9189 9124 9195 9269 9309 9310 9160

2008 9203 9096 9208 9128 8881 9000 8958 9054 9249 9279 9368 9171

2009 8955 8964 8952 9035 8970 8949 8789 8876 8959 8941 8990 8944

2010 8953 8931 8821 8858 8954 8863 8628 8879 9165 9175 9097 8998

2011 8928 8884 8787 8722

Civilian noninstitutional population

Number in thousands

16 to 17 years

2001 to 2011

Labor Force Statistics from the Current Population Survey

Original Data Value

LNU00000086

Not Seasonally Adjusted

(Unadj) Population Level - 16-17 yrs.

Source: Bureau of Labor Statistics Generated on: May 24, 2011 (01:52:52 PM)
Bureau of Labor Statistics

Annual

8020

8099

8561

8574

8778

9089

9222

9133

8944

8943

Source: Bureau of Labor Statistics Generated on: May 24, 2011 (01:52:52 PM)
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

DAY HIGH

 13,091

 9,923

 9,511

 1,215

 1,326

 1,700

 1,534

 1,109

 1,302

 775

 2,404

 5,469

 9,891

 9,663

 13,849

 13,933

 13,592

 12,952

 12,809

 11,131

 11,248

 11,368

 9,375

 12,842

 9,222

 7,734

 8,774

 14,593

 17,843

 333

 354

 325

 288

 293

 294

 298

 294

 295

 298

 308

 320

 337

 311

 385

 551

 668

 868

 1,100

 815

 1,058

 1,999

 2,255

 3,755

 1,749

 633

 450

 391

 392

 3,385

 2,519

 3,507

 524

 489

 452

 424

 416

 412

 423

 679

 1,352

 2,722

 2,116

 4,940

 5,554

 5,698

 5,631

 5,838

 5,426

 5,743

 6,538

 5,754

 8,752

 4,526

 2,771

 2,594

 4,059

 6,617

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

FEBRUARY 2008 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: March 4, 2008

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

PORT CHICAGO BOTTOM IN SUISUN BAY
# C_2012168EN.01000301.xml

| 14.6.2012 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 168/3 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

14.6.2012

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 168/3

---

Commission communication concerning the implementation of Article 4 of Regulation (EC) No 552/2004 of the European Parliament and of the Council on the interoperability of the European Air Traffic Management network (1)

1

(Text with EEA relevance)

(Publication of titles and references of Community specifications under the Regulation)

2012/C 168/03

| Organisation | Reference and title of the Community specification | Reference of superseded Community specification | Date of cessation of presumption of conformity of superseded Community specification |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| ETSI (2) | EN 303 214 V1.2.1
  Data Link Services (DLS) System; Community Specification for application under the Single European Sky Interoperability Regulation (EC) No 552/2004; Requirements for ground constituents and system testing | EN 303 214 V1.1.1 | 1 January 2014 |

Organisation

Reference and title of the Community specification

Reference of superseded Community specification

Date of cessation of presumption of conformity of superseded Community specification

ETSI (2)

2

EN 303 214 V1.2.1

Data Link Services (DLS) System; Community Specification for application under the Single European Sky Interoperability Regulation (EC) No 552/2004; Requirements for ground constituents and system testing

EN 303 214 V1.1.1

1 January 2014

---

(1)  OJ L 96, 31.3.2004, p. 26.

1

(2)  European Telecommunications Standards Institute: 650 route des Lucioles, 06921 Sophia Antipolis Cedex, France, tel. +33 492944200, fax +33 493654716, http://www.etsi.org

2

---
<TABLE>


                                                                                EXHIBIT 11
                                                                          ----------------
                          PACIFIC TELESIS GROUP AND SUBSIDIARIES
                            COMPUTATION OF EARNINGS PER SHARE
           (Dollars in millions, except per share amounts; shares in thousands)

                                                                     For the 3 Months Ended
                                                                              March 31,
<CAPTION>
                                                                 -----------------------------
                                                                             1997      1996
                                                                  ----------------------------
<S>                                                                          <C>        <C> 
  Net income                                                                 $352       $401
                                                                           =================
  Weighted average number of common shares outstanding                    428,312    428,435

  Common stock equivalent shares applicable to stock options                2,975        815
                                                                       ---------- ----------
  Total number of shares for computing primary earnings per share         431,827    429,250

  Incremental shares for computing fully diluted earnings per share             -          -
                                                                       ---------- ----------
  Total number of shares for computing fully diluted earnings per share   431,827    429,250
                                                                          ======= ==========
  Earnings per common share (as reported)                               $   0.82     $  0.94
  Primary earnings per share                                            $   0.82     $  0.93
  Fully diluted earnings per share                                      $   0.82     $  0.93
<FN>

  Earnings per share amounts for the three months ended March 31, 1997 and 1996,
  as  reported  in the  Consolidated  Statements  of  Income,  were based on the
  weighted  average  number  of common  shares  outstanding  for the  respective
  periods.  Primary and fully diluted  earnings per share amounts were not shown
  in the  Consolidated  Statements  of Income,  as they differ from the reported
  earnings per share amounts by less than three percent.
</FN>
</TABLE>