alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY

 30,215

 31,730

 33,034

 33,612

 34,055

 34,749

 35,275

 36,114

 37,173

 38,515

 39,437

 40,159

 40,559

 40,602

 40,726

 40,819

 41,265

 42,653

 43,481

 44,238

 44,885

 45,981

 46,613

 47,051

 47,376

 48,029

 49,035

 50,099

 51,224

 52,788

 53,867

 61,067

 61,746

 62,349

 63,384

 64,476

 65,415

 66,450

 67,324

 68,108

 68,733

 69,586

 70,204

 70,672

 71,446

 71,954

 72,668

 73,334

 74,472

 75,235

 75,650

 76,334

 76,633

 77,123

 77,778

 78,753

 79,970

 81,228

 82,266

 83,080

 83,485

 83,829

STORAGE - A.F. 

 91,282

 93,476

 95,383

 96,996

 98,531

 100,164

 101,725

 103,438

 105,281

 107,248

 109,023

 110,363

 111,231

 112,048

 112,680

 113,487

 114,599

 117,125

 118,716

 119,888

 121,219

 122,614

 123,736

 124,829

 126,129

 127,999

 130,263

 132,365

 134,304

 136,273

 137,696

1,640

1,661

1,432

1,421

1,293

1,351

1,346

1,444

1,419

1,216

1,348

1,484

1,144

1,173

1,123

1,172

1,346

2,398

2,175

1,446

1,673

1,323

1,377

1,392

1,324

1,343

1,459

1,540

1,209

838

1,059

2,984

2,767

2,393

2,234

2,067

2,174

2,133

2,308

2,348

2,208

2,243

2,160

1,582

1,585

1,442

1,579

1,907

3,672

2,977

2,037

2,344

2,026

1,943

1,943

1,979

2,286

2,600

2,600

2,187

1,831

1,776

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

MAY 2020 FULL NATURAL FLOW AT NEW MELONES DAM RUN DATE: 06/16/2020

TOTALS +49,079 68,315

* October 1,

135,503

 388.6

 394.1

 398.9

 403.3

 407.4

 411.7

 416.0

 420.5

 425.2

 429.6

 434.0

 438.3

 441.4

 444.6

 447.4

 450.6

 454.4

 461.6

 467.5

 471.6

 476.2

 480.3

 484.1

 488.0

 491.9

 496.4

 501.6

 506.7

 511.1

 514.7

 518.2

DONNELLS

RES

BEARDSLEY

RES

2019 TO DATE

NEW

MELONES

INFLOW

C.F.S

NATURAL

RIVER

C.F.S

ACCUM *

FULL

NATURAL

1000 A.F.

RESERVOIR

TOTAL

+2,665

+2,194

+1,907

+1,613

+1,535

+1,633

+1,561

+1,713

+1,843

+1,967

+1,775

+1,340

+868

+817

+632

+807

+1,112

+2,526

+1,591

+1,172

+1,331

+1,395

+1,122

+1,093

+1,300

+1,870

+2,264

+2,102

+1,939

+1,969

+1,423

CHANGE

A.F. C.F.S.

+1,344

+1,106

+961

+813

+774

+823

+787

+864

+929

+992

+895

+676

+438

+412

+319

+407

+561

+1,274

+802

+591

+671

+703

+566

+551

+655

+943

+1,141

+1,060

+978

+993

+717

ACRE-FEET
T hi s di s pos i t i on i s notappr opr i a t e f orpubl i c a t i on and i s notpr e c e de nt * e xc e pta s pr ovi de d by9th C i r . R . 36- 3.

T he pa ne l una ni m ous l yc onc l ude s thi s c a s e i s s ui t abl e f orde c i s i on ** w ith o u t o r a l a r g u m e n t. See F ed. R . A pp . P . 34 (a )( 2). NOT F OR P UB L I CAT I ON UN I TE D STATE S C OU RT OF APPE ALS FOR T HE NI NTH CI RC UI T UN I T E D S T AT E S OF AME R I C A, P l ai nt i ff

- A pp el l ee , v. M E L ID A F L O R E S , a. k. a. L a D on a, a. k. a. Na n c y , a . k . a . Se a l L, D e f

e n d a n t - A p p e lla n t. N o. 10- 50498 D. C . No . 2 : 0 6 - c r - 0 0 5 9 9 - C AS ME MOR AN DU M *

A pp ea l fr om the U ni t ed S t at es D i stri ctC ou rt f o rth e C e n tr a l D is tr ic t o f C a lif o rn ia C hr i s t i naA . S ny de r , D i s tr i c tJudge , P r e s i di ng S ubm i tt e d F e brua ry28, 2012 ** B efo re: L E A V Y , T H O M A S , an dC H R IS T E N , C i rcu i tJu d g es. M el i da F l ores appeal s f rom the 10 8-m on th sent ence i m po se d fol l ow i ng her gu i l ty- pl eaconv i ct i on for tw o cou nt s of c on spi ra cyw i th i nt entt o d i stri bu t e a c ontr ol l e d s ubs t a nc e , i n vi ol a t i on of 21 U . S . C . § 846; a nd e l e ve n c ount s of



# FI LED MA R 08 2012 M OLLY C. DW Y ER, CLERK U . S. C O U R T OF APPE ALS10- 50498 2 p o s s e s s io n w ith in te n t to d is tr ib u te c r a c kc o c a in e , in v io la tio n o f 2 1 U .S .C . § 841( a ) ( 1) , a nd ( b) ( 1) ( B ) ( i i i ) . W e ha ve j ur i s di c t i on unde r28 U . S . C . § 1291, a nd w e a f f i rm. F lo r e s c o n te n d s th a t th e d is tr ic t c o u rt e rr e db yd e n y in g h e ram in o rr o le adj ustm entun der U . S . S . G . § 3 B 1. 2(b). T he di stri ctcourtdi d n otcom m i tcl ear e rr o rb yc o n c lu d in g th a t F lo r e s w a s n o t am in o rp a rtic ip a n t. See U ni ted States v. Ca n tr e ll , 4 3 3 F .3 d1 2 6 9 , 1 2 8 2 - 8 3 ( 9 th C ir . 2 0 0 6 ) . F l ores al so cont ends thatthe di stri ctcourtvi ol at ed F eder al R ul e of C ri m i nal P r o c e d u r e 3 2 ( i) ( 3 ) ( B ) b e c au s e it d idn o t m a k e s u f f ic ie n t f in d in g s in s up p o rt o f

its c o n c lu s io n th a t am in o rr o le a d ju s tm e n t w a s n o t w a rr a n te d . T h e c o u rt’s s ta te m e n ts w e r e s u f f ic ie n t. Se e U

ni te d States v . I

ngham , 486 F . 3d 1068, 1074 ( 9th C i r . 2007) (Rul e 32 fi nd i ng s “ need on l y s t at e the court ’ s r es ol ut i on of the di sput ed i ss ue[] ”) (i nt ernal qu ot at i on m arks and ci t at i on om i tt ed). AF F I RME D.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY HIGH

 533

 520

 509

 506

 486

 478

 484

 457

 473

 458

 424

 349

 323

 329

 437

 536

 520

 540

 517

 471

 488

 485

 479

 458

 473

 449

 418

 462

 501

 535

 557

 484

 478

 479

 451

 436

 431

 381

 373

 366

 361

 357

 250

 241

 305

 321

 342

 434

 386

 404

 345

 330

 318

 323

 330

 360

 353

 352

 373

 373

 437

 515

 497

 499

 490

 477

 458

 447

 413

 394

 408

 384

 384

 289

 279

 316

 368

 418

 489

 480

 440

 401

 393

 391

 378

 379

 398

 383

 382

 409

 428

 500

 534

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

MAY 2018 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: June 4, 2018

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

DELTA MENDOTA CANAL AT CHECK 13 (O'NEILL)
Order filed March 7, 2013

In The 

## Fourteenth Court of Appeals

____________ NO. 14 - 12 - 00911 - CV

____________ IN THE INTEREST OF L .E.A. AND V.C.A On Appeal from the 418th District Court Montgomery County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 12 - 07 - 07969 CV



### O R D E R The clerk’s record was filed November 21, 2013
. Our review has determined that relevant item s ha ve been omitted from the clerk’ s record. See Tex. R. App. P. 34.5(c). The record does not contain :

 Order Consolidating Cause No. 09

– 06

– 05858 from County Court at Law #1, Montgomery County into Cause No. 09

– 06

– 05492 in the 418th District Court, Montgomery County, filed on or about September 22, 2009.
 Petition to Establish Parent

– Child Relationship, Cause No. 09

– 06

– 05858 from County Court at Law #1, Montgomery County, filed on or about June 11, 2009. Respondent’s Original Answer, Cause No. 09

– 06

– 05858 from

County Court at Law #1, Montgomery County, filed on or about September 14, 2009.
 Motion for Substituted Service and Affidavit in Support of Motio n for Substituted Service, Cause No. 09

– 06

– 05858 from County Court at Law #1, Montgomery County, filed on or about August 6, 2009.
 Order Authorizing Substituted Service, Cause No. 09

– 06

– 05858 from County Court at Law #1, Montgomery County, filed on or abou t August 6, 2009.
 Return of Service (Officer’s Return, Cause No. 09

– 06

– 05858 from County Court at Law #1, Montgomery County, signed by Deputy Constable J. Loggins on or about August 12, 2009.
 Affidavit, Deputy Constable James R. Loggins, Pct. 1, Montgomery County, Cause No. 09

– 06

– 05858 from County Court at Law #1, Montgomery County, filed on or about September 1, 2009. The Montgomery County District Clerk is directed to file a supplemental clerk’s record on or before March 21, 2013, containing the above

- lis ted items
. If the omitted item s are not part of the case file, the district clerk is directed to file a supplemental clerk’s record containing a certified statement that the omitted item s are not a part of the case file.

PER CURIAM
**Exhibit31.1**

CERTIFICATION

I, David Zinberg, certifythat:

1. I have reviewed thisAnnual Report on Form 10-K of Bidz.com, Inc.;

2. Based on my knowledge,this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit tostate a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of thecircumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading withrespect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge,the financial statements, and other financial information included in thisreport, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition,results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, theperiods presented in this report;

4. The registrant’s othercertifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintainingdisclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e)and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused suchdisclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, toensure that material information relating to the registrant is made known to usby others, particularly during the period in which this report is beingprepared;

b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controlsand procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about theeffectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of theperiod covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internalcontrol over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s mostrecent fiscal year that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely tomaterially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting;and

5. The registrant’s othercertifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation ofinternal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and theaudit committee of registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing theequivalent functions):

a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the designor operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonablylikely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process,summarize and report financial information; and

b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management orother employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internalcontrol over financial reporting.

Date: March 12, 2007 
|        |   | /s/ David Zinberg                                                                            |   |
|--------|--------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------|
|   |   | David Zinberg                                                                                |
|   |   | Chairman of the Board, President and  Chief Executive Officer (Principal  Executive Officer) |

 

1

----
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY HIGH

 972

 952

 921

 917

 905

 891

 898

 890

 885

 882

 884

 904

 1,004

 969

 961

 937

 969

 970

 967

 953

 991

 1,002

 953

 935

 991

 1,102

 1,017

 997

 966

 946

 926

 849

 838

 820

 803

 790

 801

 747

 787

 747

 772

 753

 739

 768

 764

 755

 784

 788

 807

 812

 826

 829

 845

 832

 831

 808

 822

 809

 820

 843

 833

 848

 895

 885

 867

 849

 838

 827

 814

 811

 805

 803

 795

 799

 834

 851

 862

 869

 883

 890

 876

 864

 877

 899

 878

 871

 891

 897

 907

 908

 907

 892

 878

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

DECEMBER 2008 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: January 6, 2009

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

HOLLAND TRACT ON OLD RIVER
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

 FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

VICENTE VILLICANA-MENDEZ,

 Petitioner,

 v.

LORETTA E. LYNCH, Attorney General,

 Respondent.

No. 14-71154

Agency No. A075-763-560

MEMORANDUM*

On Petition for Review of an Order of the

Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted January 20, 2016** 

Before: CANBY, TASHIMA, and NGUYEN, Circuit Judges.

Vicente Villicana-Mendez, a native and citizen of Mexico, petitions for

review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order denying his motion to

reopen. We have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We review for abuse of

FILED

JAN 27 2016

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

 * This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent

except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

 ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).
discretion the denial of a motion to reopen. Mohammed v. Gonzales, 400 F.3d 785,

791 (9th Cir. 2005). We deny the petition for review. 

The BIA did not abuse its discretion by denying Villicana-Mendez’s motion

to reopen as untimely, where it was filed more than 10 years after the BIA’s final

order of removal, see 8 C.F.R. § 1003.2(c)(2), and Villicana-Mendez failed to

establish the due diligence required for equitable tolling of the filing deadline, see

Avagyan v. Holder, 646 F.3d 672, 679 (9th Cir. 2011) (equitable tolling is

available to an alien who is prevented from timely filing a motion to reopen due to

deception, fraud or error, as long as petitioner exercises due diligence in

discovering such circumstances).

PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED.

2 14-71154
OFFICE OF THE AmORNEY GENERAL OF TEXAS

AUSTIN

Ron. P. T, Burar ctbauaty

AttoTa6y wulker oounty .ftuntmrills,

Teus*In all aountlee%r? this State hsving 6 populetlor. a: not 18~~ tkein el~htteen

W:olm%ndiire huixlred

**tuonty-ot@it** (lE,5&3)end not czore than eighteenthouaendrive hundred thirty-rite (l8,5@8) aooordln&to the last preoedlnggedezalCensus, **the** County Judge, the CountyAttorney,County Clerk, County Sherlfi,Tax Aseessorand Tax Oolleotore&all. reodve xaximum feea or Tr, ThousandSewn **BuntIred** Fifty (#t3,750.00) Dollarm *aoh per year; the Juetloe of the Yeaoe an6 ConstableOne Thousand Fits Rundred ($1,500.00)

Dollars eaoh per year. The fact that under thi preeent Law tbe salary is inadequatema 8atd **otclc$ala ere**  not **reoeiriw 8**  euftlolent **aumunt of**  **xoney for**  the uork perrorxed createsan exerfpxioy and **ixperatlve** pub110 neeese~ty. that **ths** Canetitutlenal Rule requiringbills to be rear5 on t!awe severaldays In waoh Eowe be suagmnded, and said Rule is **heroby** euspetided, and that thla A& 3hal.X take etteot and be la r03-06 lxesadlatel7 tron **the** data **of ita**  **pao~e, aad,**  It **ie uo**  **e~aoted.m**
The populationof wellser County, aooorbitxe

to the **Last** preaeding **Federal Oensu8**  **of 1980,**  **ms ei@hteen**  **thoua&id** five hundred and twenty-eight**hkmibitantr. Walker**  **Ootanty fS**  thS~OI&7 OOUnty **in ttWXR8** Ooai~ **Witkt.A** th8 ~&U&ktfO5 **braokete eet**  **out** ln Seuata Bill MO. 308 of the 46th Lsgie**lature, above**  **quoted.**

seaateBill Ho. 8OC Is tmoonstitutlonal ark4 void as a epeolalor loaal Aot and oonstl%utes a **violation** of seotloa.-56

or Al-tie16

3 ot **the** coMtitutlon ot the stat0 Of Texas. Texan Genetltutlon, Art. 3, 3eo. Ml; Altga1.t Y. o?",t; RW;,;;".400; FE; **Wor$h** 'k. Babbitt, 56 S.W. (&d)470; 49 3.W. (ad) 7393 wood **‘ I.**  **PLarra** fad. Solwol hutrio; *123 4 W (&I) 489. Oplnlcrns of this ?eparWt ~04, o-468 o-ihi o-28 okf3a O-898 (copy attached) o-m0 o-i004 o&5 &7e1 &45. 04581, 0-354 O-hoe hold& looal & epeoial lad uxkeon~tltutional ae ~olatl~ne of Sea. 56 of Art. 3 of the Conetitaxtton of the State bi Texas.
ft is our opinion,and you are herein adrlsed,that %enateBill 308 of the 46th **Legl~Elature,** B8guUr 3mmlon, ie uaeoastitutlonal and void and sh@ul& not **be** eonaldeved In aakfpntlngsh4 salary add azoeea feee of thb County AttcsneyFToon. R. T. ‘iurns, Pam 3

of Gelker County es provided for in Artiale 3883, Seation **1,** end titiole 3f301,Vernon's Annotated 01~11 'Ytetutes.

Trustinfr&

the WQ have fully mlSWQrnd the inquiry set out in pow letter, we em
Your8 very truly



## 2 I.\C QEal? ’ lakmout Ao8latent

APPROVED

OPlN ‘ON 

# 0

err= -I
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY HIGH

 859

 889

 745

 850

 800

 800

 785

 802

 809

 785

 786

 770

 758

 807

 811

 813

 825

 829

 854

 841

 827

 714

 760

 711

 604

 576

 669

 656

 639

 573

 526

 490

 454

 467

 460

 453

 454

 468

 463

 476

 462

 426

 489

 418

 436

 445

 465

 458

 510

 523

 525

 493

 508

 512

 442

 450

 420

 435

 376

 331

 310

 252

 617

 619

 567

 611

 593

 581

 574

 594

 601

 588

 576

 591

 585

 586

 575

 575

 586

 614

 641

 606

 622

 593

 596

 604

 530

 487

 528

 500

 462

 437

 376

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

DECEMBER 2005 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: January 20, 2006

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

DELTA MENDOTA CANAL AT CHECK 13 (O'NEILL)
(May 7, 1943.)

#### Marion A. Brennan, Appellant, v. William F. Brennan, Respondent.

All concur.
###### Editorial Note on Part 28

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 28 appear by T.D. ATF-477, 67 FR 18087 through 18090, Apr. 15, 2002.

#### § 28.80 Charges and credits on bonds.

The withdrawal of liquors without payment of tax or of specially denatured spirits free of tax, under the provisions of this part shall constitute a charge against the bond under which the withdrawal is made of (a) the tax on the liquors withdrawn or (b) of an amount equal to the tax on specially denatured spirits withdrawn that will be due in the event of failure to account for the specially denatured spirits as provided in this part. The tax on liquors so withdrawn, or an amount equal to the tax on specially denatured spirits so withdrawn that would be due as set forth above, shall, on the required accounting for such liquors or specially denatured spirits, constitute a credit to the bond of such tax or amount equal to the tax, as the case may be.

[25 FR 5734, June 23, 1960. Redesignated at 40 FR 16835, Apr. 15, 1975, and further redesignated by T.D. TTB-8, 69 FR 3834, Jan 27, 2004, and25 FR 5734, June 23, 1960. Redesignated at 40 FR 16835, Apr. 15, 1975, and further redesignated by T.D. TTB-8, 69 FR 3834, Jan 27, 2004, and as amended by T.D. TTB-146, 82 FR 1136, Jan. 4, 2017]
<PAGE>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ENACTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of United Bancorp, Inc. (the "Company")
on Form 10-Q for the period ending September 30, 2005 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, James
W. Everson, Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as enacted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
          of the Company.


/s/ James W. Everson
-------------------------------------
James W. Everson,
Chairman, President and
Chief Executive Officer

November 14, 2005
§ 30.709 How are payments for medicinal drugs determined? Unless otherwise specified by OWCP, payment for medicinal drugs prescribed by physicians shall not exceed the amount derived by multiplying the average wholesale price of the medication by the quantity or amount provided, plus a dispensing fee. OWCP may, in its discretion, contract for or require the use of specific providers for certain medications. ( a ) All prescription medications identified by NDC number will be assigned an average wholesale price representing the product's nationally recognized wholesale price as determined by surveys of manufacturers and wholesalers. OWCP will establish the dispensing fee, which will not be affected by the location or type of provider dispensing the medication.
( b ) The NDC numbers, the average wholesale prices, and the dispensing fee shall be reviewed from time to time and updated as necessary.
( c ) With respect to prescribed medications, OWCP may require the use of generic equivalents where they are available.
[84 FR 3055, Feb. 8, 2019]
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY HIGH

 17,992

 17,312

 16,938

 17,254

 15,385

 14,925

 15,318

 16,829

 17,634

 18,637

 19,281

 19,604

 18,387

 18,210

 17,223

 17,046

 15,949

 14,345

 12,466

 15,900

 17,508

 20,019

 19,967

 20,566

 20,092

 18,924

 21,433

 20,375

 18,527

 15,817

 14,170

 8,604

 8,384

 8,020

 7,905

 7,994

 7,018

 7,493

 7,461

 7,663

 7,869

 7,900

 8,380

 6,321

 6,421

 7,687

 7,570

 7,631

 7,876

 6,572

 7,739

 8,876

 9,748

 8,675

 9,814

 9,159

 9,390

 9,486

 10,333

 8,669

 6,942

 6,271

 13,349

 12,839

 12,590

 12,963

 11,737

 10,893

 10,898

 11,418

 11,684

 12,033

 12,888

 13,311

 12,350

 11,860

 12,093

 12,272

 12,292

 11,177

 9,499

 11,318

 12,217

 14,090

 13,810

 14,749

 14,435

 13,744

 15,696

 15,096

 13,587

 11,499

 10,059

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

JANUARY 2021 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: February 2, 2021

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

PITTSBURG BOTTOM ON THE SACRAMENTO RIVER