alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
### **CHAPTER 15—THE REPUBLIC OF THE PHILIPPINES**

#### SUBCHAPTER I—LAWS AND OBLIGATIONS OF UNITED STATES

#### Part 1—Customs Duties

Sec.
1251 to 1255. Omitted.

#### Part 2—Quotas

1261 to 1266. Omitted.

#### Part 3—Internal Taxes

1271 to 1274. Omitted.

#### Part 4—Immigration

1281, 1281a. Omitted or Repealed.

#### SUBCHAPTER II—OBLIGATIONS OF PHILIPPINES

#### Part 1—Purposes

1291.
Omitted.

#### Part 2—Customs Duties

1301 to 1305. Omitted.

#### Part 3—Internal Taxes

1311 to 1313. Omitted.

#### Part 4—Immigration

1321, 1322. Omitted.

#### Part 5—General Provisions

1331 to 1334. Omitted.

#### SUBCHAPTER III—EXECUTIVE AGREEMENT BETWEEN UNITED STATES AND PHILIPPINES

1341 to 1348. Omitted.

#### SUBCHAPTER IV—GENERAL PROVISIONS RELATING TO TRADE RELATIONS

1351 to 1353. Omitted.
1354.
Quotas on Philippine articles.
1355.
Suspension of processing tax on coconut oil.
1356.
Termination of payments into Philippine treasury.
1357.
Trade agreements with the Philippines.
1358.
Rights of third countries.
1359.
Omitted.
1360.
Definitions.

#### SUBCHAPTER IV–A—TRADE RELATIONS UNDER REVISED AGREEMENT

1371, 1372. Omitted.
1373.
Suspension of Philippine Trade Act of 1946.
1374 to 1379. Omitted.

#### SUBCHAPTER V—PROPERTY RETAINED BY THE UNITED STATES

1381.
Retention by United States of title to real and personal property.
1382.
Administration of the Trading With the Enemy Act in Philippines.
1383.
Transfer of property by President of United States.
1384.
Transfer of shares of corporations owning agricultural lands; consideration; indemnification.
1385.
Ownership of naval reservations, diplomatic property, etc., unaffected.
1386.
Definitions.

#### SUBCHAPTER VI—MISCELLANEOUS PROVISIONS

1391.
Transfer of property and rights to Philippine Commonwealth.
1392.
Acquisition of military and naval bases by United States.
1393.
Supplementary sinking fund for bond payments; purchase of bonds by United States; creation of special trust account.
1394.
Recognition of Philippine independence.
1395.
Definitions.
§ 404.1927 Appeals. ( a ) A request for reconsideration, hearing, or Appeals Council review of a determination that is filed with the competent authority or agency of a country with which the U.S. has concluded an agreement, shall be considered to have been timely filed with SSA if it is filed within the 60-day time period provided in §§ 404.911, 404.918, and 404.946.
( b ) A request for reconsideration, hearing, or Appeals Council review of a determination made by SSA resulting from a claim filed under an agreement shall be subject to the provisions in subpart J of this part. The rules governing administrative finality in subpart J of this part shall also apply.
114TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 3937 

AN ACT 

To designate the building utilized as a United States courthouse located at 150 Reade Circle in Greenville, North 

Carolina, as the ‘‘Randy D. Doub United States Courthouse’’. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 
2 

•HR 3937 EH

1 SECTION 1. DESIGNATION. 

2 The building utilized as a United States courthouse 

3 located at 150 Reade Circle in Greenville, North Carolina, 

4 shall be known and designated as the ‘‘Randy D. Doub 

5 United States Courthouse’’ during the period in which the 

6 building is utilized as a United States courthouse. 

7 SEC. 2. REFERENCES. 

8 With respect to the period in which the building re9 ferred to in section 1 is utilized as a United States court10 house, any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, 

11 paper, or other record of the United States to that build12 ing shall be deemed to be a reference to the ‘‘Randy D. 

13 Doub United States Courthouse’’. 

Passed the House of Representatives September 20, 

2016. 

Attest: 

Clerk. 

114TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 3937 

AN ACT 

To designate the building utilized as a United 

Doub United States Courthouse’’. Greenville, North Carolina, as the ‘‘Randy D. States courthouse located at 150 Reade Circle in
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

DAY HIGH

 15,843

 15,110

 15,706

 14,785

 14,136

 13,613

 14,363

 15,444

 16,358

 17,054

 18,768

 18,905

 19,470

 18,814

 17,542

 16,511

 15,813

 15,304

 15,891

 16,134

 16,472

 16,495

 16,979

 16,989

 16,436

 15,594

 16,268

 17,027

 16,910

 15,407

 5,859

 5,486

 5,860

 6,055

 6,450

 6,628

 6,370

 6,067

 6,247

 6,189

 5,778

 6,453

 7,382

 6,796

 6,270

 5,923

 6,361

 6,438

 7,137

 7,316

 6,210

 2,000

 6,270

 6,278

 6,311

 5,840

 5,902

 7,513

 8,119

 6,844

 10,269

 9,744

 10,234

 10,402

 10,456

 9,870

 9,684

 10,075

 10,599

 10,597

 11,209

 12,399

 12,397

 11,544

 10,626

 10,498

 10,616

 10,857

 11,088

 11,204

 10,934

 10,694

 11,059

 11,039

 10,932

 11,120

 11,616

 12,857

 12,540

 10,688

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

SEPTEMBER 2009 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: October 2, 2009

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

PITTSBURG BOTTOM ON THE SACRAMENTO RIVER
#### § 340.5 Recovery by cash payment.

The Board shall have the right to require that amounts recoverable be immediately and fully repaid in cash and any debtor shall have the absolute right to repay such amount recoverable in this manner. However if the debtor is financially unable to pay the indebtedness in a lump sum, payment may be accepted in regular installments. The amount and frequency of such installment payments should bear a reasonable relation to the size of the debt and the debtor's ability to pay. Whenever possible installment payments should be sufficient in amounts and frequency to liquidate the debt in not more than three years.
§ 10.616 How does a claimant obtain a hearing? ( a ) A claimant, injured on or after July 4, 1966, who has received a final adverse decision by the district office may obtain a hearing by writing to the address specified in the decision. The hearing request must be sent within 30 days (as determined by postmark or other carrier's date marking) of the date of the decision for which a hearing is sought. The claimant must not have previously submitted a reconsideration request (whether or not it was granted) on the same decision.
( b ) OWCP will schedule an oral hearing and determine whether the oral hearing will be conducted in person, including whether the in person hearing will be by teleconference, videoconference or other electronic means. The claimant can request a change in the format from a hearing to a review of the written record by making a written request to the Branch of Hearings and Review. OWCP will grant a request received by the Branch of Hearings and Review within 30 days of: the date OWCP acknowledges the initial hearing request, or the date OWCP issues a notice setting a date for an oral hearing, in cases where the initial request was for, or was treated as a request for, an oral hearing. A request received after those dates will be subject to OWCP's discretion. The decision to grant or deny a change of format from a hearing to a review of the written record is not reviewable.
**EXHIBIT 99.17** 

 

United States Securities and Exchange Commission

| **Subject** | **CONSENT OF THOMAS STUBENS** |
|-------------|-------------------------------|

Gentlemen:

In connection with Silver Wheaton Corporation’s (the “Company”) Annual Report on Form 40-F for the year ended December 31, 2008 (the “Annual Report”), I, Thomas C. Stubens, M.A.Sc., P.Eng., Senior Geologist (Wardrop Engineering Inc.), hereby consent to the inclusion in, or incorporation by reference into, and the use of my name in connection with the preparation of the            following documents/reports:

 

| 1.     | Resource and reserve estimates of the La Negra Mine;                                                                                                                                                                       |
|--------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   |                                                                                                                                                                                                                       |
| 2.     | Technical report dated February 15, 2008, entitled “Technical Report on the Mineral Resources and Mineral Reserves of the el Alacran Deposit of the La Negra Silver Lead Zinc Copper Mine, Queretaro, Mexico”; |
|   |                                                                                                                                                                                                                       |
| 3.     | The Annual Report.                                                                                                                                                                                                         |

 

Dated this 30th day of March, 2009

|   | Yours truly,/s/ Thomas C. Stubens                                                                                                                                                  |
|--------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   | Name: Thomas C. Stubens, M.A.Sc., P.Eng. Title:   Senior Geologist,            Wardrop Engineering Inc. |
485 P.2d 374

#### STATE of New Mexico, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Alcario N. GALLEGOS a/k/a Alex Michael Gallegos, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 602.

Court of Appeals of New Mexico.

April 23, 1971.

Certiorari Denied May 19, 1971.

Douglas T. Francis, Albuquerque, for defendant-appellant.

David L. Norvell, Atty. Gen., Thomas Patrick Whelan, Jr., Asst. Atty. Gen., Santa Fe, for plaintiff-appellee.

OPINION

WOOD, Judge.

In 1958, defendant, a juvenile, was transferred from juvenile court to district court, *619tried' and convicted for armed robbery. He filed' a motion for postconviction relief which was denied without a hearing. No appeal was taken. His second motion for postconviction relief under § 21-1-1(93), N. M.S.'A:19'53 (Repl.Vol. 4) was also denied without a hearing. Defendant appeals from the denial of this second motion.

The trial court denied the second motion on the basis that it was a successive motion which the court was not required to entertain. Section 21-1-1(93) (d), supra. We need not decide whether defendant’s second motion was a successive one that need not be considered. See State v. Lobb, 78 N.M. 735, 437 P.2d 1004 (1968); State v. Canales, 78 N.M. 429, 432 P.2d 394 (1967), and State v. Flores, 79 N.M. 412, 444 P.2d 597 (Ct.App.1968).

The second motion was properly denied because it stated no basis for postconviction relief. This motion, and the prior one, claimed that defendant was not furnished counsel at the juvenile transfer proceeding, nor advised of any right to counsel in that proceeding. Neller v. State, 79 N. M. 528, 445 P.2d 949 (1968) assumed that a right to counsel existed in connection with transfer proceedings but over this judge’s dissent, held that such a right can be waived. *Neller*states:

> “ * * * , that waiver is accomplished when, upon arraignment with counsel in district court, no objection is made to the failure to be represented by counsel during the juvenile court investigation.”

The record shows that a waiver, as defined in *Neller,*occurred in this case. Thus, no grounds for postconviction relief are stated in the second motion. Since no grounds for relief are stated, the trial court did not err in refusing to hold an evidentiary hearing on the motion. State v. Lobb, supra.

The-order denying relief without a hearing is -affirmed.

It is so ordered.

SPIÉSS, C. J., and HENDLEY, J., concur.
#### § 211.14 Maximum creditable compensation.

Maximum creditable compensation for calendar years after 1984 is the maximum annual taxable wage base defined in section 3231(e)(2)(B) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986. In November of each calendar year the Director of Research and Employment Accounts shall notify each employer of the amount of maximum creditable compensation applicable to the following calendar year.

[58 FR 45251, Aug. 27, 1993]
§ 1.4 Where are other rules concerning OWCP functions found? ( a ) The rules of OWCP governing its functions under the Longshore and Harbor Workers' Compensation Act and its extensions are set forth in subchapter A of chapter VI of this title.
( b ) The rules of OWCP governing its functions under the Black Lung Benefits Act program are set forth in subchapter B of chapter VI of this title.
( c ) The rules and regulations of the Employees' Compensation Appeals Board are set forth in chapter IV of this title.
( d ) The rules and regulations of the Benefits Review Board are set forth in Chapter VII of this title.
I 

116TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 5603 

To provide that for purposes of determining compliance with title IX of 

the Education Amendments of 1972 in athletics, sex shall be determined 

on the basis of sex assigned at birth by a physician. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JANUARY 14, 2020 

Mr. STEUBE (for himself, Mrs. LESKO, and Mr. HAGEDORN) introduced the 

following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Education and Labor 

A BILL 

To provide that for purposes of determining compliance with 

title IX of the Education Amendments of 1972 in athletics, sex shall be determined on the basis of sex assigned at birth by a physician. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Protection of Women 

5 and Girls in Sports Act of 2020’’. 

6 SEC. 2. SEX DISCRIMINATION IN ATHLETICS. 

7 For purposes of determining compliance with title IX 

8 of the Education Amendments of 1972 (20 U.S.C. 1681– 


lotter on DSKBCFDHB2PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 5603 IH

1 1688) in athletics, sex shall be determined on the basis 

2 of sex assigned at birth by a physician. 

Æ 


lotter on DSKBCFDHB2PROD with BILLS
Meeting Summary 

Meeting with Procter & Gamble to Discuss Pelargonic Acid, Salts & Esters Registration 

Review Summary Document 

November 30, 2010; 2:00 PM to 3:30 PM 

Room S-8671, 2777 S. Crystal Drive, Arlington, VA 22202 

Participants

Procter & Gamble: Mario Green, Don Versteeg, Jan Dhonau, Pat Quinn 

EPA: Eliza Blair (AD), Tim McMahon (AD), Jenny Tao (AD), Lance Wormell (AD), 

Mark Hartman (AD), Jonathan Chen (AD), Srinivas Gowda (AD), Nathan Mottl (AD) 

Summary

Agency toxicologists and registration review team members met with NOBS 

registrant Procter & Gamble to discuss the Nonanoic acid, sulfophenyl ester, sodium salt 

(NOBS) portion of the recently issued Pelargonic Acid, Salts & Esters Registration 

Review Summary Document (case 6077). The registrant wished to clarify the reason why 

some studies previously submitted to support this chemical were deemed unacceptable. 

Based on the meeting, the Agency intends to send the registrant more study 

reviews clarifying the Agency’s reasons for not accepting the studies. Additionally, the 

registrant intends to submit further information in response to the upcoming NOBS data 

call-in to support and upgrade some toxicology studies. The registrant will also submit 

additional ecological studies. 

Once received, the Agency will review the information and decide which alreadysubmitted studies can be upgraded and accepted and which will still be required for the 

data call-in.
### MEMORANDUM OPINION

No. 04

- 12

- 00 054

- CR

IN RE Jason MIEARS

Original Mandamus Proceeding 1

PER CURIAM

Sitting: Rebecca Simmons, Justice

Steven C. Hilbig, Justice

Marialyn Barnard, Justice

Delivered and Filed: February 8, 2012

PETITION FOR WRIT OF MANDAMUS DENIED

On January 26, 2012, relator Jason Miears filed a petition for writ of mandamus. The

court has considered relator’s petition and is of th e opinion that relator is not entitled to the relief

sought. Accordingly, the petition for writ of mandamus is DENIED. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P

.

52.8(a).

PER CURIAM

DO NOT PUBLISH

1 This proceeding arises out of Cause No. 2009

- CR

- 6568, s tyled State of Te xas v. Jason Miears , in the 379th

Judicial District Court

, Bexar County, Texas, the Honorable Ron Rangel presiding.
Exhibit 23.1   Consent
of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm  We consent to the
incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements (Form S-3 No. 333-140525
and 333-145144) of Global Partners LP and in the related Prospectuses, and
the Registration Statement (Form S-8 No. 333-145579) pertaining to
the Global Partners LP Long Term Incentive Plan, of our reports dated March 12,
2010, with respect to the consolidated financial statements and schedule of
Global Partners LP, and the effectiveness of internal control over
financial reporting of Global Partners LP, included in this Annual Report
(Form 10-K) for the year ended December 31, 2009.   /s/ ERNST & YOUNG
  LLPBoston, MassachusettsMarch 12, 2010
# C_2013033EN.01000101.xml

| 5.2.2013 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 33/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

5.2.2013

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 33/1

---

Communication from the Commission on the body authorised to issue certificates of origin under Regulation (EC) No 891/2009

2013/C 33/01

On the basis of Commission Regulation (EC) No 891/2009 of 25 September 2009, published in the
  Official Journal of the European Union L 254 of 26 September 2009, an import tariff quota has been opened for sugar originating in India.

Official Journal of the European Union

Under Article 10 of Commission Regulation (EC) No 891/2009 of 25 September 2009, the release for free circulation of the goods imported under that quota is conditional upon presentation of a certificate of origin.

The following authority is authorised to issue certificates of origin under this Regulation:

| Office of Additional Director General of Foreign Trade Office |
| --- |
| Nishta Bhavan, 48, Sir Vithaldas Thackersey Marg |
| Churchgate |
| Mumbai 400 020 |
| INDIA |
| Tel. +220 17716 / +220 38094 / +220 31074 |
| Fax +220 01255 |

Office of Additional Director General of Foreign Trade Office

Nishta Bhavan, 48, Sir Vithaldas Thackersey Marg

Churchgate

Mumbai 400 020

INDIA

Tel. +220 17716 / +220 38094 / +220 31074

Fax +220 01255

---
### §625. Inapplicability of certain requirements to catfish

Notwithstanding any other provision of this chapter, the requirements of sections 603, 604, 605, 610(b), and 623 of this title shall not apply to any fish described in section 601(w)(2) of this title.

(Mar. 4, 1907, ch. 2907, title I, §25, as added Pub. L. 110–234, title XI, §11016(b)(1)(C), May 22, 2008, 122 Stat. 1369, and Pub. L. 110–246, §4(a), title XI, §11016(b)(1)(C), June 18, 2008, 122 Stat. 1664, 2131; amended Pub. L. 113–79, title XII, §12106(a)(3), Feb. 7, 2014, 128 Stat. 981.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Pub. L. 110–234 and Pub. L. 110–246 enacted identical sections. Pub. L. 110–234 was repealed by section 4(a) of Pub. L. 110–246.

#### Amendments

2014—Pub. L. 113–79 substituted "not apply to any fish described in section 601(w)(2) of this title." for "not apply to catfish."

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date of 2014 Amendment

Amendment by Pub. L. 113–79 effective as if enacted as part of section 11016(b) of Pub. L. 110–246, see section 12106(c) of Pub. L. 113–79, set out as a note under section 601 of this title.

#### Effective Date

Enactment of this section and repeal of Pub. L. 110–234 by Pub. L. 110–246 effective May 22, 2008, the date of enactment of Pub. L. 110–234, except as otherwise provided, see section 4 of Pub. L. 110–246, set out as a note under section 8701 of Title 7, Agriculture.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

DAY ELEV

 223.67

 223.39

 222.00

 222.30

 222.97

 222.00

 221.55

 221.73

 220.90

 219.61

 219.42

 218.72

 218.68

 218.97

 219.07

 220.13

 219.25

 220.10

 220.10

 221.48

 222.26

 223.05

 224.48

 221.67

 222.08

 221.68

 221.07

 219.40

 52,840

 52,089

 48,385

 49,182

 50,966

 48,385

 47,204

 47,677

 45,498

 42,145

 41,656

 39,876

 39,775

 40,508

 40,762

 43,489

 41,221

 43,411

 43,411

 47,020

 49,075

 51,180

 55,022

 47,519

 48,597

 47,546

 45,944

 41,605

STORAGE

-402

-751

-3,704

+797

+1,784

-2,581

-1,181

+473

-2,179

-3,353

-489

-1,780

-101

+733

+254

+2,727

-2,268

+2,190

+0

+3,609

+2,055

+2,105

+3,842

-7,503

+1,078

-1,051

-1,602

-4,339

CHANGE

3,046

3,083

3,077

2,923

2,681

2,279

2,156

2,196

2,081

2,058

2,048

1,901

1,680

1,421

1,227

1,189

1,192

1,235

1,206

1,103

969

904

897

871

755

681

1,060

1,340

PUMPING

 3,511

 3,643

 4,025

 3,285

 3,153

 3,901

 4,215

 4,150

 4,771

 4,887

 3,928

 4,549

 4,863

 5,062

 5,313

 4,991

 5,493

 3,762

 4,479

 4,085

 4,907

 4,444

 3,955

 6,092

 4,230

 4,468

 4,338

 3,654

PUMPING

 6,118

 5,802

 7,331

 4,824

 4,686

 5,813

 4,577

 3,796

 4,077

 4,604

 3,968

 3,407

 2,522

 890

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 569

 151

 1,870

 2,193

 4,731

 3,584

 3,106

 2,781

 3,497

PUMPING

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

GEN.

*

+623

+466

+988

+845

+1,085

+1,119

+862

+452

+397

+513

+363

+562

+492

+177

+203

-76

+121

-12

+1

+191

+60

+248

+313

-8

+535

+475

+412

+587

OR

UNITED STATES 

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION

CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT

CONSOLIDATED STATE-FEDERAL O'NEILL FOREBAY March 13, 2002

DAILY OPERATIONS

FEBRUARY 2002 RUN DATE:

IN LAKE GEN.

ACRE-FEET O'NEILL

RELEASE - C.F.S. 

TOTALS -11,637 47,259 0 84,897 122,154 +11,994

ACRE-FEET -11,637 93,738 0 168,393 242,292

SUMMARY

 0

RELEASE (ACRE-FEET)

O'NEILL GEN. 0

SAN LUIS PUMP 168,393 0

 53,242

DOS AMIGOS PUMP 242,292

DELIVERIES 

S. LUIS O'NEILL

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 1,742

 0

 867

 780

 691

 690

 1,205

 1,545

 0

 953

 952

 867

 0

 10,292

 20,414

CALIF. DOS AMIGOS

AQUEDUCT

5,758

5,517

5,424

4,743

4,973

5,015

5,179

5,536

5,272

5,229

5,239

4,596

5,162

4,724

4,011

3,510

3,037

2,776

2,493

4,489

4,375

5,018

5,330

6,177

6,114

4,936

3,973

3,037

 131,643

 261,114

S. LUIS

DELIV.

GAINS(+)

LOSS(-)

C.F.S.

INFLOW - C.F.S

STATE OF CALIFORNIA

THE RESOURCES AGENCY

DEPARTMENT OF WATER RESOURCES

STATE WATER PROJECT

TOTAL 410,685

 23,790

* DAILY DEL. FIGURES UNAVAILABLE. TOT. DEL. IS INCLUDED IN COMPUTING MONTHLY TOTALS 

Table 18
Electrical Conductivity, UMHOS

Day High Low Mean

1 14,792 4,249 9,316

2 15,279 4,299 9,580

3 12,953 4,475 9,361

4 13,495 4,431 9,330

5 13,069 4,453 8,125

6 12,653 4,321 9,393

7 13,150 5,090 9,430

8 15,950 6,108 11,965

9 16,959 8,776 13,105

10 17,384 8,464 13,180

11 17,199 8,674 12,813

12 15,336 7,272 11,611

13 14,862 6,985 11,369

14 15,731 6,901 11,505

15 15,405 6,459 11,060

16 16,848 3,751 11,017

17 13,695 4,969 9,588

18 14,898 5,761 11,333

19 15,551 5,684 11,365

20 19,877 6,300 13,833

21 18,776 6,925 13,308

22 15,980 5,484 11,459

23 14,647 5,181 10,732

24 16,250 4,879 10,224

25 14,548 5,429 10,378

26 12,869 4,424 8,887

27 12,720 3,697 8,375

28 13,227 3,106 8,131

29 12,937 3,173 7,565

30 13,235 2,992 7,867

31 11,712 3,216 8,152

COMMENT(S):

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

Historical Archive and Report Database

Port Chicago Top In Suisun Bay 

Period: October 2023 Run Date: 11/8/2023