alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
STORAGE - A.F. RESERVOIR CHANGE NEW MELONES NATURAL ACCUM * FULL

Day DONNELLS

RESERVOIR

BEARDSLEY

RESERVOIR

TOTAL A.F. C.F.S. INFLOW C.F.S RIVER C.F.S NATURAL 

1000 A.F.

1 42,866 72,732 115,598 3,218 1,622 9,228 10,850 180.5

2 42,653 74,028 116,681 1,083 546 3,899 4,445 189.3

3 42,152 74,976 117,128 447 225 2,858 3,083 195.5

4 41,504 75,852 117,356 228 115 2,393 2,508 200.4

5 41,087 77,136 118,223 867 437 7,320 7,757 215.8

6 40,437 78,015 118,452 229 115 4,337 4,452 224.6

7 39,613 78,331 117,944 -508 -256 3,100 2,844 230.3

8 38,886 78,325 117,211 -733 -370 3,616 0 230.3

9 39,021 79,189 118,210 999 504 8,314 8,818 247.8

10 39,143 78,898 118,041 -169 -85 16,445 16,360 280.2

11 38,733 78,707 117,440 -601 -303 4,636 4,333 288.8

12 38,330 78,680 117,010 -430 -217 5,629 5,412 299.6

13 37,876 78,641 116,517 -493 -249 5,097 4,848 309.2

14 37,406 78,773 116,179 -338 -170 9,052 8,882 326.8

15 36,773 78,614 115,387 -792 -399 8,921 8,522 343.7

16 36,065 78,581 114,646 -741 -374 10,526 10,152 363.8

17 35,227 78,502 113,729 -917 -462 5,689 5,227 374.2

18 34,324 78,463 112,787 -942 -475 4,062 3,587 381.3

19 33,428 78,436 111,864 -923 -465 3,659 3,194 387.6

20 32,489 78,390 110,879 -985 -497 3,409 2,912 393.4

21 31,538 78,364 109,902 -977 -493 3,183 2,690 398.8

22 30,632 78,292 108,924 -978 -493 2,878 2,385 403.5

23 29,661 78,325 107,986 -938 -473 2,783 2,310 408.1

24 28,685 78,318 107,003 -983 -496 2,555 2,059 412.2

25 27,658 78,325 105,983 -1,020 -514 2,379 1,865 415.9

26 26,651 78,312 104,963 -1,020 -514 2,633 2,119 420.1

27 25,756 78,266 104,022 -941 -474 2,421 1,947 423.9

28 24,835 78,272 103,107 -915 -461 2,437 1,976 427.8

29 23,786 78,325 102,111 -996 -502 2,295 1,793 431.4

30 22,701 78,305 101,006 -1,105 -557 2,540 1,983 435.3

31 21,604 78,305 99,909 -1,097 -553 2,157 1,604 438.5

Totals -12,471 140,917

Acre - Feet 279,509

* October 1, 2022 to date

Historical Archive and Report Database

Full Natural Flow At New Melones Dam

 January 2023 

 Run Date: 3/29/2023
### IMPORTATION BY CHINESE SUBJECTS OR TRAFFICKING IN, IN CHINA, BY UNITED STATES CITIZENS
EXHIBIT 21.1

Volcom, Inc.

Names and Jurisdictions of Subsidiaries



|                                              |  |               
|--------------------------------------------- |  | --------------
|Electric Holding Corporation                  |  | Delaware      
|Electric Visual Evolution Australia Pty Ltd   |  | Australia     
|Electric Visual Evolution New Zealand Limited |  | New Zealand   
|Electric Visual Evolution Spain               |  | Spain         
|Electric Visual Evolution, LLC                |  | California    
|LS&S Retail, Inc.                             |  | Delaware      
|Sarl Electric Europe                          |  | France        
|Volcom Distribution (UK) Limited              |  | United Kingdom
|Volcom Entertainment, Inc.                    |  | California    
|Volcom International SARL                     |  | Switzerland   
|Volcom Japan Godogaishiya                     |  | Japan         
|Volcom Retail (UK) Limited                    |  | United Kingdom
|Volcom Retail France                          |  | France        
|Volcom Retail, Inc.                           |  | Delaware      
|Volcom SAS                                    |  | France        
|Welcom Distribution SARL                      |  | Switzerland   
|Volcom Australia Holding Company Pty Ltd      |  | Australia     
|Volcom Australia Pty Ltd                      |  | Australia     
|Volcom New Zealand Limited                    |  | New Zealand   
|Volcom Distribution Spain SL                  |  | Spain
#### § 255.2 Overpayments.

An overpayment, within the meaning of this part, is made in any case in which an individual receives a payment under the Railroad Retirement Act, all or part of which payment he or she is not entitled to receive.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY ELEVATION

 238.60

 238.51

 238.46

 238.47

 238.44

 238.44

 238.45

 238.45

 238.45

 238.45

 238.45

 238.44

 238.44

 238.47

 238.51

 238.46

 238.44

 238.45

 238.44

 238.44

 238.44

 238.39

 238.32

 238.29

 238.28

 238.28

 238.28

 238.28

 238.29

 238.30

 238.29

 309

 300

 295

 296

 293

 293

 294

 294

 294

 294

 294

 293

 293

 296

 300

 295

 293

 294

 293

 293

 293

 288

 281

 278

 277

 277

 277

 277

 278

 279

 278

STORAGE

-21

-9

-5

+1

-3

+0

+1

+0

+0

+0

+0

-1

+0

+3

+4

-5

-2

+1

-1

+0

+0

-5

-7

-3

-1

+0

+0

+0

+1

+1

-1

CHANGE

 0

 1

 0

 287

 276

 93

 90

 94

 90

 92

 92

 90

 90

 92

 91

 31

 48

 103

 154

 285

 229

 247

 258

 258

 233

 242

 325

 303

 336

 262

 229

 7,500

 6,820

 6,490

 6,280

 6,110

 5,870

 5,830

 5,690

 5,650

 5,590

 5,550

 5,690

 5,690

 5,910

 5,870

 5,610

 5,340

 5,300

 5,280

 5,380

 5,570

 5,400

 5,260

 5,170

 5,170

 5,170

 5,210

 5,190

 5,360

 5,320

 5,720

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

MARCH 2008 RED BLUFF DIVERSION RESERVOIR DAILY OPERATIONS RUN DATE: June 25, 2008

IN LAKE

CANAL

 ACRE-FEET

TOTALS -52 5,021 175,990

ACRE-FEET -52 9,959 349,076

SUMMARY

RELEASE (ACRE-FEET)

TOTAL 359,501

 330

RELEASE

RIVER

CORNING TO SACTO

CANAL

RELEASE C.F.S.

TEHAMA

COLUSA

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 17

 17

 17

 17

 0

 0

 18

 18

 18

 53

 5

 34

 21

 235

 466

CORNING CANAL 466

TEHAMA-COLUSA CANAL 9,959

TO SACTO RIVER 349,076

Table 9
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
<CURRENCY> U.S. DOLLARS
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1998
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<CASH>                                          50,068
<SECURITIES>                                     4,079
<RECEIVABLES>                                  102,401
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                     21,505
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               201,159
<PP&E>                                         258,967
<DEPRECIATION>                                (106,078)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 545,177
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          155,560
<BONDS>                                        130,374
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         2,584
<OTHER-SE>                                     158,495
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   545,177
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               243,194
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  249,996
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                (8,632)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              12,460
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (10,630)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   (6,181)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (16,811)
<DISCONTINUED>                                 (6,449)
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (23,260)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.93)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.92)
        

</TABLE>
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

DAY HIGH

 706

 471

 377

 697

 1,088

 2,221

 3,376

 2,572

 2,426

 1,710

 1,430

 1,735

 2,313

 1,823

 1,921

 961

 493

 1,213

 1,365

 1,207

 2,030

 3,416

 5,616

 5,875

 6,134

 6,748

 5,961

 5,391

 5,993

 3,836

 269

 247

 247

 237

 232

 247

 240

 267

 223

 219

 197

 210

 226

 215

 241

 219

 202

 219

 228

 226

 250

 290

 346

 488

 547

 500

 557

 511

 655

 622

 411

 341

 298

 284

 347

 543

 683

 580

 576

 482

 403

 427

 569

 551

 512

 377

 296

 362

 396

 409

 579

 980

 1,416

 1,792

 1,847

 1,873

 1,868

 1,908

 2,171

 1,742

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

JUNE 2010 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: July 2, 2010

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

PITTSBURG BOTTOM ON THE SACRAMENTO RIVER
§ 204.3 Employment relation—prior service. An individual shall have an employment relation to an employer on August 29, 1935, for purposes of crediting service prior to January 1, 1937, if: ( a ) He or she was in the service of an employer on that date; or
( b ) He or she was on that date on 1eave of absence expressly granted by the employer or by a duly authorized representative of such employer, but only if such leave of absence was established to the satisfaction of the Board before July 1947; or
( c ) He or she was in the service of an employer after that date and before January 1946, in each of six calendar months, whether or not consecutive; or
( d ) Before that date he or she did not retire and was not retired or discharged from the service of the last employer by whom he or she was employed, but solely by reason of a physical or mental disability he or she ceased before August 29, 1935, to be in the service of such employer and thereafter remained continuously disabled until he or she attained age sixty-five or until August 1945; or
( e ) Solely for the reason stated in paragraph (c) of this section an employer by whom he or she was employed before August 29, 1935, did not on or after August 29, 1935, and before August 1945, call him or her to return to service, or if he or she were called to return to service he or she for such reason was unable to render service in six calendar months as provided in paragraph (b) of this section; or
( f ) He or she was on August 29, 1935, absent from the service of an employer by reason of a discharge which, within one year after the effective date thereof, was protested to an appropriate labor representative or to the employer, as wrongful, and which was followed within ten years of the effective date thereof by his or her reinstatement in good faith to his or her former service with all his or her seniority rights.
#### Robert L. MINTEER, Petitioner—Appellant, v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, Respondent—Appellee.

No. 05-74551.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted Feb. 13, 2006.*

Decided Feb. 22, 2006.

*791Robert L. Minteer, Bozeman, MT, pro se.

Charles S. Casazza, Donald L. Korb, Acting Chief Counsel Internal Revenue Service, Regina S. Moriarty, Esq., U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, DC, for Respondent-Appellee.

Before: FERNANDEZ, RYMER, and BYBEE, Circuit Judges.

*

 The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. *See*Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

MEMORANDUM **

Robert L. Minteer appeals pro se from the Tax Court’s summary judgment in favor of the Commissioner of Internal Revenue (“CIR”) in his action contesting tax deficiencies for the year 2001. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 26 U.S.C. § 7482. We review de novo, *see Talley Indus. Inc. v. Comm’r,*116 F.3d 382, 385 (9th Cir. 1997), and we affirm.

The Tax Court properly granted summary judgment for the CIR because Minteer’s receipt of $7,156 from his retirement fund was taxable income as he used it to purchase gold coins which are in his possession, rather than rolling it over into another retirement plan. *See*26 U.S.C. § 408(d)(1) and (3). The Tax Court also properly assessed a ten percent addition because Minteer was not yet 59 56 years of age when the distribution was made. *See*26 U.S.C. § 72(t)(2).

We reject Minteer’s contention that the IRS should have allowed him to withdraw his petition and thereby end the collection action against him. *See*26 U.S.C. §§ 6214(a) (“the Tax Court shall have jurisdiction to redetermine the correct amount of the deficiency”), 6213(a) (providing the Tax Court with jurisdiction over a timely filed petition).

We also reject Minteer’s contention that the IRS violates Equal Protection by giving tax-deferred status to some retirement plans and not others.

AFFIRMED

**

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
CERTIFICATION   31.2



I, Elaine K. Roberts



1.

I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of Oppenheimer Holdings Inc.;

2.

Based on my knowledge, this annual report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this annual report;

3.

Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this annual report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this annual report;

4.

The registrants other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and we have:

5.

a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this annual report is being prepared;

b) designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles;

c) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures; and presented in this annual report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures as of the end of the period covered by the annual report based on such evaluation

d) disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control over financial reporting; and

6.

The registrants other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):

(a) significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial data; and

b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial reporting



/s/ E.K. Roberts

Name: Elaine K. Roberts

Title: Chief Financial Officer



March 9, 2006
```

[Congressional Bills 114th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 3983 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

114th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 3983

 To provide for a report on the role of incubators and accelerators in 
    the commercialization of federally funded research and regional 
                         economic development.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            November 5, 2015

Mr. Peters (for himself and Mr. Swalwell of California) introduced the 
following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Science, Space, 
                             and Technology

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To provide for a report on the role of incubators and accelerators in 
    the commercialization of federally funded research and regional 
                         economic development.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Building Opportunity for Student 
Startups Act'' or the ``BOSS Act''.

SEC. 2. NATIONAL ACADEMIES REPORT ON INCUBATORS AND ACCELERATORS.

    Not later than 1 year after the date of enactment of this Act, the 
Under Secretary of Commerce for Standards and Technology shall enter 
into an arrangement with the National Academy of Sciences to conduct a 
study on the role of incubators and accelerators, including university-
based incubators and accelerators, in the commercialization of 
federally funded research and regional economic development. The study 
shall--
            (1) include an examination of metrics for comparing 
        startups that have and have not completed incubator or 
        accelerator programs, and include the role of incubators and 
        accelerators in developing regional innovation clusters; and
            (2) identify best practices in the structure, goals, 
        operation, management, and funding mechanisms of leading 
        incubators and accelerators.
                                 <all>
```
#### Charles S. Hirsch, Respondent, v. Solomon K. Lichtenstein, Appellant.

— Judgment and order affirmed, with costs. Ho opinion. Present — Ingraham, P. J., McLaughlin, Laughlin, Clarke and Scott, JJ.; McLaughlin, J., dissented.
Exhibit 23.1
   /s/Ernst & Young LLP
### §9575. Performance management

The Director shall ensure that all activities conducted or supported by the Institute or a National Education Center make customer service a priority. The Director shall ensure a high level of customer satisfaction through the following methods:

(1) Establishing and improving feedback mechanisms in order to anticipate customer needs.

(2) Disseminating information in a timely fashion and in formats that are easily accessible and usable by researchers, practitioners, and the general public.

(3) Utilizing the most modern technology and other methods available, including arrangements to use data collected electronically by States and local educational agencies, to ensure the efficient collection and timely distribution of information, including data and reports.

(4) Establishing and measuring performance against a set of indicators for the quality of data collected, analyzed, and reported.

(5) Continuously improving management strategies and practices.

(6) Making information available to the public in an expeditious fashion.

(Pub. L. 107–279, title I, §185, Nov. 5, 2002, 116 Stat. 1972.)
### §4511. Expenditures and audit

(a) The Secretary of the Treasury is authorized to pay to the Foundation from the interest and earnings of the fund such sums as the Board determines are necessary and appropriate to enable the Foundation to carry out the provisions of this chapter.

(b) The activities of the Foundation under this chapter may be audited by the Government Accountability Office under such rules and regulations as may be prescribed by the Comptroller General of the United States. The representatives of the Government Accountability Office shall have access to all books, accounts, records, reports, and files and all other papers, things, or property belonging to or in use by the Foundation, pertaining to such activities and necessary to facilitate the audit.

(Pub. L. 99–500, §101(b) [title VIII, §812], Oct. 18, 1986, 100 Stat. 1783–39, 1783–80, and Pub. L. 99–591, §101(b) [title VIII, §812], Oct. 30, 1986, 100 Stat. 3341–39, 3341–80; Pub. L. 108–271, §8(b), July 7, 2004, 118 Stat. 814.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Pub. L. 99–591 is a corrected version of Pub. L. 99–500.

#### Amendments

2004—Subsec. (b). Pub. L. 108–271 substituted "Government Accountability Office" for "General Accounting Office" in two places.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY HIGH

 5,289

 5,368

 6,380

 6,283

 6,520

 5,828

 6,893

 7,902

 5,700

 4,672

 4,061

 4,463

 4,847

 5,694

 7,174

 8,783

 8,814

 10,116

 10,094

 8,833

 7,842

 5,617

 4,866

 5,609

 6,727

 7,545

 8,015

 8,573

 10,860

 10,371

 10,288

 609

 689

 697

 657

 542

 475

 560

 460

 622

 578

 633

 894

 832

 904

 1,131

 1,003

 1,003

 884

 1,024

 1,012

 946

 927

 780

 863

 1,199

 1,537

 1,761

 1,637

 1,729

 1,706

 1,646

 1,872

 1,998

 2,213

 2,231

 2,109

 1,873

 2,331

 2,982

 2,810

 2,492

 2,151

 2,210

 1,908

 2,160

 2,832

 3,211

 3,619

 3,796

 3,759

 3,535

 3,305

 2,759

 2,414

 2,963

 3,444

 3,543

 3,855

 4,217

 5,134

 5,085

 4,889

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

MAY 2007 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: June 5, 2007

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

PITTSBURG BOTTOM ON THE SACRAMENTO RIVER