alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

WESTERN DISTRICT

**JASON ROBERT PAUL AND JOAN PAUL**

**v.**

**DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN SERVICES OF THE COMMONWEALTH; SOMERSET** 

**COUNTY CHILD PROTECTIVE SERVICES; EXECUTIVE BRANCH OF** 

**THE COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA; OFFICE OF**  **ATTORNEY GENERAL; AND**

**SOMERSET BOROUGH POLICE**

**DEPARTMENT**

**PETITION OF: JASON ROBERT PAUL :** 

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**: No. 255 WAL 2016** 

**Petition for Allowance of Appeal from**

**the Order of the Commonwealth Court**

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW **, this 1st day of November, 2016, the Petition for A llowance of Appeal** 

**is** DENIED

**.**
### §§6211 to 6215. Omitted

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Sections 6211 to 6215 were omitted pursuant to section 6251 of this title which provided that the authority under this chapter terminated on Oct. 1, 2001.

Section 6211, Pub. L. 103–239, title V, §501, May 4, 1994, 108 Stat. 597, related to State and local partnership requests and responsibilities for waivers.

Section 6212, Pub. L. 103–239, title V, §502, May 4, 1994, 108 Stat. 598; Pub. L. 103–382, title III, §394(j)(2), Oct. 20, 1994, 108 Stat. 4029; Pub. L. 107–110, title X, §1076(q), Jan. 8, 2002, 115 Stat. 2092, related to waiver authority of Secretary of Education.

Section 6213, Pub. L. 103–239, title V, §503, May 4, 1994, 108 Stat. 600, related to waiver authority of Secretary of Labor.

Section 6214, Pub. L. 103–239, title V, §504, May 4, 1994, 108 Stat. 601, related to combination of Federal funds for high poverty schools.

Section 6215, Pub. L. 103–239, title V, §505, May 4, 1994, 108 Stat. 602, related to combination of Federal funds by States for school-to-work activities.
§ 30.515 Is a recipient responsible for an overpayment that resulted from an error made by OWCP? ( a ) The fact that OWCP may have erred in making the overpayment does not by itself relieve the recipient of the overpayment from liability for repayment if the recipient also was at fault in accepting the overpayment.
( b ) However, OWCP may find that the recipient was not at fault if failure to report an event affecting compensation benefits, or acceptance of an incorrect payment, occurred because: ( 1 ) The recipient relied on misinformation given in writing by OWCP regarding the interpretation of a pertinent provision or EEOICPA of this part; or
( 2 ) OWCP erred in calculating either the percentage of impairment or wage-loss under Part E of EEOICPA.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

DAY HIGH

 17,070

 18,793

 18,405

 19,059

 18,840

 18,436

 18,932

 18,647

 18,151

 17,427

 17,746

 17,528

 17,503

 18,519

 19,360

 20,150

 19,219

 19,866

 19,489

 19,843

 16,626

 15,715

 16,107

 15,825

 15,669

 15,739

 18,324

 20,150

 19,890

 19,805

 9,065

 9,126

 8,739

 7,547

 7,375

 7,448

 7,596

 8,221

 8,527

 8,409

 8,627

 8,971

 9,071

 9,456

 9,707

 10,158

 9,317

 9,012

 8,825

 9,444

 6,196

 7,164

 7,214

 7,214

 7,053

 7,141

 9,265

 11,227

 10,022

 9,479

 12,558

 13,293

 13,185

 12,690

 13,010

 12,907

 13,358

 13,488

 13,577

 13,637

 13,256

 13,112

 13,004

 13,665

 14,481

 14,612

 14,352

 14,146

 14,509

 14,778

 12,807

 11,768

 12,478

 11,807

 11,666

 12,058

 13,446

 14,938

 14,541

 14,272

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

NOVEMBER 2013 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: February 21, 2014

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

PITTSBURG BOTTOM ON THE SACRAMENTO RIVER
## In the Court of Appeals Second Appellate District of Texas at Fort Worth

No. 02

- 20

- 00301

- CV

HWAT, I NC ., INDIVIDUALLY AND
D / B / A H OME W ARRANTY A DMINISTRATORS , Appellant

V

.

E DDIE A GNEW , Appellee §

§

§

§ On Appeal from County Court at Law No. 2

of Tarrant County ( 2019

- 006741

- 2 )

April 1, 2021

Memorandum Opinion by Justice Bassel

JUDGMENT

This court has considered the record on appeal in this case and holds that there

was error in the trial court’s judgment. It is ordered that the judgment of the trial

court is reversed

, and the case is remanded to the trial court for further proceedings

consistent with this opinion

.

It is further ordered that Edd ie Agnew shall pay all of the costs of this appeal,

for which let exec ution issue.

SECOND DISTRICT COURT OF APPEALS

By /s/ Dabney Bassel Justice Dabney Bassel
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

DAY HIGH

 22,302

 20,708

 19,133

 18,475

 18,185

 17,535

 18,465

 14,450

 14,450

 14,450

 14,450

 14,450

 14,450

 14,450

 14,450

 14,450

 9,488

 9,071

 6,421

 5,206

 6,669

 11,236

 10,190

 9,209

 13,168

 12,134

 9,007

 5,786

 9,036

 8,358

 7,962

 7,739

 8,283

 8,982

 9,248

 14,450

 14,450

 14,450

 14,450

 14,450

 14,450

 14,450

 14,450

 721

 561

 749

 706

 844

 941

 1,100

 811

 712

 848

 762

 552

 386

 15,944

 14,720

 13,458

 13,042

 13,542

 13,923

 14,426

 14,450

 14,450

 14,450

 14,450

 14,450

 14,450

 14,450

 14,450

 10,658

 3,925

 3,863

 3,101

 2,464

 2,721

 4,570

 3,893

 3,710

 5,873

 4,656

 3,560

 2,133

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

FEBRUARY 2007 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: March 8, 2007

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

PORT CHICAGO BOTTOM IN SUISUN BAY
###### Editorial Note on Part 40

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 40 appear by T.D. ATF-460, 66 FR 39094-39096, July 27, 2001; T.D. ATF-464, 66 FR 43479, Aug. 20, 2001; and T.D. TTB-91, 76 FR 5479, Feb. 1, 2011.

#### § 40.43 Interference with administration.

Whoever, corruptly or by force or threats of force, endeavors to hinder or obstruct the administration of this part, or endeavors to intimidate or impede any TTB officer acting in his official capacity, or forcibly rescues or attempts to rescue or causes to be rescued any property, after it has been duly seized for forfeiture to the United States in connection with a violation of the internal revenue laws, shall be liable to the penalties prescribed by law.

(68A Stat. 855; 26 U.S.C. 7212)
§ 1010.110 What definitions apply to this part? The following definitions apply to this part: *Covered person* as defined in section 2(a) of the JVA (38 U.S.C. 4215(a)) means a veteran or eligible spouse.
*Department or DOL* means the United States Department of Labor, including its agencies and organizational units and their representatives.
*Eligible spouse* as defined in section 2(a) of the JVA (38 U.S.C. 4215(a)) means the spouse of any of the following: ( 1 ) Any veteran who died of a service-connected disability;
( 2 ) Any member of the Armed Forces serving on active duty who, at the time of application for the priority, is listed in one or more of the following categories and has been so listed for a total of more than 90 days: ( i ) Missing in action;
( ii ) Captured in line of duty by a hostile force; or
( iii ) Forcibly detained or interned in line of duty by a foreign government or power;
( 3 ) Any veteran who has a total disability resulting from a service-connected disability, as evaluated by the Department of Veterans Affairs;
( 4 ) Any veteran who died while a disability, as indicated in paragraph (3) of this section, was in existence.
*Grant* means an award of Federal financial assistance by the Department of Labor to an eligible recipient.
*Jobs for Veterans Act (JVA)* means Public Law 107-288 (2002). Section 2(a) of the JVA, codified at 38 U.S.C. 4215(a), provides priority of service for covered persons.
*Non-covered person* means any individual who meets neither the definition of “veteran,” as defined in this section, nor the definition of “eligible spouse” as defined in this section.
*Qualified job training program* means any program or service for workforce preparation, development, or delivery that is directly funded, in whole or in part, by the Department of Labor.
*Recipient* means an entity to which federal financial assistance, in whole or in part, is awarded directly from the Department or through a sub-award for any qualified job training program.
*Secretary* means the Secretary of the Department of Labor.
*Veteran* means a person who served in the active military, naval, or air service, and who was discharged or released therefrom under conditions other than dishonorable, as specified in 38 U.S.C. 101(2). Active service includes full-time duty in the National Guard or a Reserve component, other than full-time duty for training purposes.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY HIGH

 18,957

 21,443

 21,269

 22,668

 26,641

 24,256

 20,547

 19,611

 18,875

 15,045

 13,158

 13,331

 13,355

 17,389

 22,091

 21,476

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 468

 421

 1,065

 3,896

 6,666

 6,994

 8,899

 6,900

 7,185

 7,591

 8,893

 11,300

 11,015

 8,205

 8,103

 7,849

 6,115

 4,345

 4,176

 3,085

 3,116

 5,726

 7,874

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 301

 282

 275

 273

 288

 297

 320

 11,561

 13,736

 14,341

 15,717

 18,361

 18,279

 16,106

 14,620

 14,348

 11,178

 9,190

 8,712

 7,918

 9,336

 11,345

 14,723

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 366

 331

 401

 819

 1,520

 2,043

 2,970

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

JANUARY 2019 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: February 11, 2019

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

PORT CHICAGO BOTTOM IN SUISUN BAY
§ 234.58 Computation of the separation allowance lump-sum payment. The separation allowance lump-sum payment is calculated as follows: ( a ) Determine the amount of the compensation due to the receipt of separation or severance pay that could not be considered in the computation of tier II;
( b ) Multiply this amount by the rate or rates of tax imposed by section 3201(b) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1954 or 1986 on the compensation (tier II tax); and
( c ) The product is the amount of the separation allowance lump-sum payment.
Example: In January of 1988 an employee with 10 years of railroad service relinquished his seniority rights in order to receive a separation allowance of $20,000, thereby severing his employment relation. This was the only creditable railroad compensation earned by the employee in 1988. Both the employer and employee would have paid their share of railroad retirement taxes on this amount. With respect to the employee tier II tax, the tax rate for 1988 was 4.9% under section 3201(b) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986. Although the full $20,000 was creditable under the Railroad Retirement Act for tier I benefit computation purposes, only one month's compensation, $2,800, one-twelfth of the annual tier II earnings base of $33,600 for 1988, was creditable for tier II benefit purposes. This is because section 3(i)(4) of the Railroad Retirement Act does not permit crediting of compensation for tier II computation purposes after the employment relation has been severed. Under the lump-sum provision discussed above, the employee in this example would, upon award of his employee annuity, receive a payment of $842.80 ($20,000 minus $2,800, the amount of separation allowance that was creditable, or $17,200 times 4.9%).
EXHIBIT 3.28
 AMENDED AND RESTATED
OPERATING AGREEMENT
OF
FARMINGTON MISSOURI HOSPITAL COMPANY, LLC
   ARTICLE I
 OFFICES
   ARTICLE II
 MEMBERS




---



##### 



2




---



##### 



ARTICLE III
 MANAGERS
       3




---



##### 



4




---



##### 



ARTICLE IV
 OFFICERS
    5




---



##### 



6




---



##### 



ARTICLE V
 CONTRACTS, LOANS, CHECKS AND DEPOSITS
  7




---



##### 



ARTICLE VI
 TRANSFER OF PERCENTAGE OWNERSHIP
  ARTICLE VII
 FISCAL YEAR
  ARTICLE VIII
 DISTRIBUTIONS
  ARTICLE IX
 SEAL
  8




---



##### 



ARTICLE X
 WAIVER OF NOTICE
  ARTICLE XI
 INDEMNIFICATION OF OFFICERS AND MANAGERS
  ARTICLE XII
 AMENDMENTS
  9




---



##### 



1st March
 FARMINGTON HOSPITAL CORPORATION, Sole MemberBy:
    
    /s/ D. Andrew SlusserName:
    
    D. Andrew SlusserTitle:
    
    Vice President
 10
EXHIBIT 31.2  CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 USC, SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES OXLEY ACT OF 2002  I, Richard Smith, certify that:  1.I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-KSB of Northern Ethanol, Inc. (the Registrant or the Company);  2.Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary in order to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;  3.Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the Registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;  4.The Registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the Registrant and have:  a.Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the Registrant (including its consolidated subsidiaries), is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;  b.Evaluated the effectiveness of the Registrants disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based upon such evaluations;  c.Disclosed in this report any change in the Registrants internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the Registrants most recent fiscal quarter (the registrants fourth quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the Registrants internal control over financial reporting; and        5.The Registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the Registrants auditors and the Audit Committee of the Registrants Board of Directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):  a.All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the Registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and  b.Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the Registrants internal control over financial reporting.   Dated:  April 27, 2007
        s/Richard Smith
Richard Smith, Chief Financial Officer
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

DAY HIGH

 12,639

 12,067

 12,719

 13,230

 12,661

 11,555

 10,650

 10,080

 9,450

 8,976

 18,370

 18,821

 17,199

 17,841

 17,981

 17,885

 18,086

 19,056

 17,594

 17,926

 17,901

 17,592

 17,264

 17,483

 18,110

 18,120

 18,887

 18,786

 19,805

 19,663

 5,773

 5,780

 5,960

 5,902

 5,839

 5,324

 4,731

 4,956

 4,651

 4,422

 4,770

 8,648

 8,789

 8,818

 8,818

 8,911

 8,676

 9,481

 9,086

 9,325

 9,998

 9,636

 9,449

 10,024

 10,214

 10,072

 9,673

 9,859

 9,813

 9,882

 8,447

 8,789

 9,004

 8,923

 8,587

 7,856

 7,383

 7,299

 6,905

 6,756

 10,493

 13,404

 12,406

 13,085

 13,310

 13,411

 13,855

 14,206

 13,605

 13,799

 14,307

 13,565

 13,636

 14,013

 14,050

 13,778

 14,079

 14,428

 14,347

 14,550

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

SEPTEMBER 2014 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: October 1, 2014

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

PITTSBURG BOTTOM ON THE SACRAMENTO RIVER
EXHIBIT 3.21
 STATE OF MISSOURI
 [SEAL]
 
   
     /s/ Robin CarnahanRobin Carnahan, Secretary of State




---



##### 



(Submit with Filing fee of $105)
  Farmington Clinic Company, LLC
 (Must include Limited Liability Company, Limited Company, LC, L.C. L.L.C. or LLC)
 To transact
any and all lawful business for which a limited liability company may be organized under the
Missouri United Liability Company Act
  National Registered Agents, Inc.
    
    300-B East High Street
    
    Jefferson City, MO 65101Name
    
    Street Address: May not use P. O. Box unless street address also provided
    
    City/State/Zip
 o þ (check one)
 Perpetual
 
 (The answer to this question could cause possible tax consequences, you may wish to
consult with your attorney or accountant)
  
 (Date may not be more than 90 days after the filing date in this office)
   /s/ Robin Keck
    
    Robin J. Keck
    
    4/27/06Organizer Signature
    
    Printed Name
    
    DateOrganizer Signature
    
    Printed Name
    
    DateOrganizer Signature
    
    Printed Name
    
    Date
 Name and address to return filed document:Name:
    
    State of MissouriAddress
    
    Creation  LLC/LP 1 Page(s)City, State, and Zip Code:
    
    [BARCODE]T06111806568




---



##### 



File Number: 200612112104LCO0735241Date Filed 04/28/2006Robin CarnahanSecretary of State
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY HIGH

 630

 495

 446

 391

 377

 405

 450

 442

 472

 418

 365

 385

 445

 504

 517

 511

 494

 495

 530

 437

 512

 453

 439

 445

 430

 420

 513

 575

 555

 470

 461

 317

 308

 300

 293

 286

 284

 284

 288

 298

 296

 292

 284

 270

 266

 248

 252

 269

 291

 296

 301

 318

 317

 295

 311

 319

 326

 339

 349

 342

 341

 340

 383

 358

 352

 332

 321

 332

 345

 345

 344

 337

 327

 309

 310

 313

 322

 323

 328

 352

 347

 351

 364

 365

 362

 372

 368

 368

 383

 402

 400

 392

 394

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

AUGUST 2012 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: November 1, 2012

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

DELTA MENDOTA CANAL AT CHECK 13 (O'NEILL)
§ 30.210 What are the criteria for eligibility for benefits relating to radiogenic cancer? ( a ) To establish eligibility for benefits for radiogenic cancer under Part B of EEOICPA, an employee or his or her survivor must show that: ( 1 ) The employee has been diagnosed with one of the forms of cancer specified in § 30.5(gg); and ( i ) Is a member of the Special Exposure Cohort (as described in § 30.214(a) of this subpart) who, as a civilian DOE employee or civilian DOE contractor employee, contracted the specified cancer after beginning employment at a DOE facility; or
( ii ) Is a member of the Special Exposure Cohort (as described in § 30.214(a) of this subpart) who, as a civilian atomic weapons employee, contracted the specified cancer after beginning employment at an atomic weapons employer facility (as defined in § 30.5(e)); or
( 2 ) The employee has been diagnosed with cancer; and ( i ) ( A ) Is/was a civilian DOE employee who contracted that cancer after beginning employment at a DOE facility; or
( B ) Is/was a civilian DOE contractor employee who contracted that cancer after beginning employment at a DOE facility; or
( C ) Is/was a civilian atomic weapons employee who contracted that cancer after beginning employment at an atomic weapons employer facility; and
( ii ) The cancer was at least as likely as not related to the employment at the DOE facility or atomic weapons employer facility; or
( 3 ) The employee has been diagnosed with an injury, illness, impairment or disease that arose as a consequence of the accepted cancer.
( b ) ( 1 ) To establish eligibility for benefits for radiogenic cancer under Part E of EEOICPA, an employee or his or her survivor must show that: ( i ) The employee has been diagnosed with cancer; and ( A ) Is/was a civilian DOE contractor employee or a civilian RECA section 5 uranium worker who contracted that cancer after beginning employment at a DOE facility or a RECA section 5 facility; and
( B ) The cancer was at least as likely as not related to exposure to a toxic substance of a radioactive nature at a DOE facility or a RECA section 5 facility; and
( C ) It is at least as likely as not that the exposure to such toxic substance(s) was related to employment at a DOE facility or a RECA section 5 facility; or
( ii ) The employee has been diagnosed with an injury, illness, impairment or disease that arose as a consequence of the accepted cancer.
( 2 ) Eligibility for benefits for radiogenic cancer under Part E in a claim that has previously been accepted under Part B pursuant to the Special Exposure Cohort provisions is described in § 30.230(a) of these regulations.
[71 FR 78534, Dec. 29, 2006, as amended at 84 FR 3049, Feb. 8, 2019; 86 FR 46778, Aug. 20, 2021]
```

[Congressional Bills 114th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 3874 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

114th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 3874

To amend the State Department Basic Authorities Act of 1956 to require 
  reports on the Rewards for Justice program, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            November 2, 2015

  Mr. McCaul introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                      Committee on Foreign Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To amend the State Department Basic Authorities Act of 1956 to require 
  reports on the Rewards for Justice program, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. CONGRESSIONAL NOTIFICATION OF REWARD.

    (a) In General.--Section 36 of the State Department Basic 
Authorities Act of 1956 (22 U.S.C. 2708) is amended--
            (1) in subsection (g), by adding at the end the following 
        new paragraph:
            ``(4) Reports on rewards authorized.--Not less than 15 days 
        after a reward is authorized under this section, the Secretary 
        of State shall submit to the appropriate congressional 
        committees a report, which may be submitted in classified form 
        if necessary, detailing information about the reward, including 
        the identity of the individual for whom the reward is being 
        made, the amount of the reward, the acts with respect to which 
        the reward is being made, and how the reward is being 
        publicized.''; and
            (2) in subsection (k)(2), by striking ``International 
        Relations'' and inserting ``Foreign Affairs''.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a)(1) takes 
effect on the date of the enactment of this Act and applies with 
respect to any reward authorized under section 36 of the State 
Department Basic Authorities Act of 1956 on or after such date.
                                 <all>
```