alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
II 

Calendar No. 496 

114TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 3866 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

APRIL 19, 2016 

Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Homeland Security and 

Governmental Affairs 

MAY 25, 2016 

Reported by Mr. JOHNSON, without amendment 

AN ACT 

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service 

located at 1265 Hurffville Road in Deptford Township, 

New Jersey, as the ‘‘First Lieutenant Salvatore S. 

Corma II Post Office Building’’. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. FIRST LIEUTENANT SALVATORE S. CORMA II 

4 POST OFFICE BUILDING. 

5 (a) DESIGNATION.—The facility of the United States 

6 Postal Service located 1265 Hurffville Road in Deptford 

7 Township, New Jersey, shall be known and designated as 


asabaliauskas on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 3866 RS

1 the ‘‘First Lieutenant Salvatore S. Corma II Post Office 

2 Building’’. 

3 (b) REFERENCES.—Any reference in a law, map, reg4 ulation, document, paper, or other record of the United 

5 States to the facility referred to in subsection (a) shall 

6 be deemed to be a reference to the ‘‘First Lieutenant 

7 Salvatore S. Corma II Post Office Building’’. 


asabaliauskas on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with BILLS

asabaliauskas on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
Calendar No. 496 

114TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 3866 

AN ACT 

To designate the facility of the United States PostBuilding’’. Lieutenant Salvatore S. Corma II Post Office Deptford Township, New Jersey, as the ‘‘First al Service located at 1265 Hurffville Road in 

MAY 25, 2016 

Reported without amendment 


asabaliauskas on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
I 

114TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 3928 

To authorize the Capitol Police to enforce the immigration laws, and for 

other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

NOVEMBER 4, 2015 

Mr. KING of Iowa (for himself, Mr. BARLETTA, Mr. GOHMERT, Mr. GOSAR, 

Mr. BROOKS of Alabama, Mr. DUNCAN of South Carolina, Mr. SMITH of 

Texas, and Mr. BABIN) introduced the following bill; which was referred 

to the Committee on House Administration 

A BILL 

To authorize the Capitol Police to enforce the immigration 

laws, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Ending the Sanctuary 

5 Capitol Policy Act of 2015’’. 

6 SEC. 2. CAPITOL POLICE AUTHORIZED TO ENFORCE THE 

7 IMMIGRATION LAWS. 

8 Section 9B of the Act entitled ‘‘An Act to define the 

9 area of the United States Capitol Grounds, to regulate the 


emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 3928 IH

1 use thereof, and for other purposes’’, approved July 31, 

2 1946 (2 U.S.C. 1967), is amended— 

3 (1) in paragraph (4), by striking ‘‘and’’; 

4 (2) in paragraph (5)(B), by striking the period 

5 at the end and inserting ‘‘; and’’; and 

6 (3) by inserting after paragraph (5) the fol7 lowing: 

8 ‘‘(6) within the District of Columbia, including 

9 the area described under subsection (b), with respect 

10 to any violation of the immigration laws, if the offi11 cer is in the performance of official duties when the 

12 authority is exercised.’’. 

Æ 


emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with BILLS
#### Harvey P. Barnhart, Respondent, v. Sylvia L. Shea and Others, Appellants.

Appeal dismissed, without costs, upon stipulation filed.
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



I, Robert L. Hodgkinson, Chief Executive Officer of Dejour Enterprises Ltd., certify that:

1.

I have reviewed this annual report on Form 20-F of Dejour Enterprises Ltd.;

2.

Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3.

Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4.

The registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

a)

designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

b)

evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

c)

disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter (the registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control over financial reporting; and

5.

The registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of the registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

a)

all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

b)

any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial reporting

|Date:  July 14, 2006 | Signed:  /s/  Robert L. Hodgkinson          
|-------------------- | --------------------------------------------
|                     | ROBERT L. HODGKINSON
Chief Executive Officer
#### § 7.241 OMB control numbers assigned under the Paperwork Reduction Act.

(a) *Purpose.* This subpart displays the control numbers assigned to information collection requirements in this part by the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) under the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995, [Public Law 104-13](https://www.govinfo.gov/link/plaw/104/public/13).

(b) *Table.* The following table identifies each section in this part that contains an information collection requirement and the OMB control number that is assigned to that information collection requirement.

Table 1 to Paragraph (b)

| Section where contained | Current OMB Control No. |
| --- | --- |
| 7.11 | 1513-0111 |
| 7.21 | 1513-0020 |
| 7.22 | 1513-0020 |
| 7.24 | 1513-0020 1513-0064 |
| 7.25 | 1513-0020 |
| 7.27 | 1513-0020 |
| 7.28 | 1513-0122 |
| 7.29 | 1513-0020 |
| 7.62 | 1513-0087 |
| 7.63 | 1513-0084 1513-0087 |
| 7.66 | 1513-0085 |
| 7.67 | 1513-0085 |
| 7.81 | 1513-0087 |
| 7.82 | 1513-0121 |
| 7.83 | 1513-0121 |
| 7.84 | 1513-0087 |
| 7.233 | 1513-0087 |
Order entered January 28, 2019

In The

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-18-01460-CR

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellant

V.

GEORGE THOMPSON, Appellee

On Appeal from the County Criminal Court No. 6

Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. MA17-13978-G

ORDER

We REINSTATE this appeal.

On January 8, 2019, we ordered the trial court to make findings of fact and conclusion of 

law regarding the trial court’s ruling on George Thompson’s motion to suppress. We have 

received a supplemental clerk’s record containing the trial court’s January 24, 2019 findings of 

fact and conclusion of law.

We ORDER the State’s brief due within thirty days of the date of this order.

We DIRECT the Clerk to send copies of this order to counsel for all parties.

/s/ CORY L. CARLYLE 

JUSTICE
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THE SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS OF THE REGISTRANT FOR THE SIX MONTH PERIOD ENDING OCTOBER 31, 1998
AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>                     <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          APR-30-1998             APR-30-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               OCT-31-1998             OCT-31-1998
<CASH>                                           3,906                   3,906
<SECURITIES>                                         0                       0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    2,315                   2,315
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0                       0
<INVENTORY>                                      6,962                   6,962
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                15,211                  15,211
<PP&E>                                         650,805                 650,805
<DEPRECIATION>                               (121,912)               (121,912)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 554,878                 554,878
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          545,599                 545,599
<BONDS>                                              0                       0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                        2,088,001               2,088,001
<PREFERRED>                                          0                       0
<COMMON>                                             0                       0
<OTHER-SE>                                 (2,082,067)             (2,082,067)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   554,878                 554,878
<SALES>                                              0                       0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 6,944                  13,889
<CGS>                                                0                       0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0                       0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                   390                     390
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0                       0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0                       0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (7,206)                (16,001)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0                       0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0                       0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0                       0
<CHANGES>                                            0                       0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (7,206)                (16,001)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  (0.001)                 (0.001)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  (0.001)                 (0.001)
        

</TABLE>
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY HIGH

 23,844

 21,895

 22,866

 23,326

 23,139

 20,457

 21,083

 22,245

 23,763

 26,435

 24,973

 23,975

 22,081

 21,200

 22,103

 14,158

 8,102

 4,228

 2,061

 1,400

 3,125

 6,147

 9,732

 7,324

 5,807

 6,461

 6,471

 6,051

 6,800

 9,925

 9,260

 11,418

 10,902

 10,308

 11,120

 12,273

 12,040

 12,246

 11,278

 13,123

 14,908

 12,954

 10,152

 7,340

 5,936

 5,833

 2,986

 1,224

 696

 516

 433

 378

 320

 310

 307

 295

 284

 282

 275

 269

 277

 395

 17,818

 16,243

 17,130

 17,750

 18,218

 17,596

 17,430

 17,687

 18,174

 20,005

 18,930

 17,470

 15,807

 14,402

 14,360

 9,932

 3,948

 1,589

 851

 603

 853

 1,342

 2,141

 1,635

 1,093

 1,268

 1,357

 1,376

 1,707

 2,967

 3,348

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

DECEMBER 2016 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: January 5, 2017

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

PORT CHICAGO BOTTOM IN SUISUN BAY
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY HIGH

 15,189

 15,303

 14,749

 14,883

 14,233

 13,028

 12,626

 12,423

 12,355

 13,441

 13,492

 13,702

 14,738

 16,299

 17,946

 17,770

 18,302

 17,612

 17,556

 16,874

 16,053

 14,703

 15,524

 16,104

 16,377

 16,860

 17,392

 17,985

 17,214

 17,356

 15,103

 4,397

 4,596

 3,669

 4,593

 4,671

 4,554

 4,792

 5,144

 5,692

 6,190

 4,377

 5,338

 5,664

 5,415

 5,774

 6,736

 6,481

 6,391

 6,496

 6,798

 6,486

 6,210

 6,659

 7,115

 7,718

 7,786

 7,703

 7,228

 7,223

 6,533

 6,752

 8,574

 8,772

 8,523

 8,881

 8,860

 8,695

 8,871

 8,820

 8,736

 9,039

 9,198

 9,210

 9,636

 10,513

 11,234

 11,437

 11,354

 11,204

 11,315

 11,387

 10,688

 10,797

 10,757

 11,057

 11,189

 11,713

 11,774

 11,937

 11,798

 11,411

 11,009

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

AUGUST 2020 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: October 19, 2020

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

PITTSBURG BOTTOM ON THE SACRAMENTO RIVER
8/08 MI-252SC

REPUBLIC OF THE MARSHALL ISLANDS

Office of the Maritime Administrator

TYPE APPROVAL CERTIFICATE OF

BALLAST WATER MANAGEMENT SYSTEM

This is to certify that the Ballast Water Management System listed below has been examined and 

tested in accordance with the requirements of the specifications contained in the Guidelines 

contained in IMO resolution MEPC.125(53). This certificate is valid only for the Ballast Water 

Management System referred to below.

Ballast Water Management System supplied by or under license from NEI Treatment Systems, 

LLC

Under type and model designation VOS-2500-101 and incorporating:

Ballast Water Management System manufactured by or under license from NEI Treatment 

Systems, LLC

To equipment/assembly drawing No.: 07-2500-101 Date: 29 August 2007

Equipment Serial Number(s):

Other equipment manufactured by: N/A

To equipment/assembly drawing No.: N/A Date: N/A

Equipment Serial Number(s):

Treatment Rated Capacity: 2,500 m

3

/h

Installed Aboard IMO Vessel Number:

A copy of this Type Approval Certificate should be carried on board a vessel fitted with this 

Ballast Water Management System at all times. A reference to the test protocol and a copy of 

the test results should be available for inspection on board the vessel.

No limiting conditions are imposed.

Dated this 2nd of September, 2008.
#### Bert H. Goldstein, Respondent, v. Pullman Company et al., Defendants, and Atchison, Topeka and Santa Fe Railway Company, Defendant-Appellant.

No opinion. Appeal from the order entered March 16, 1943, dismissed, without costs. Settle order on notice within ten days from the date of this decision. Close, P. J., Carswell, Johnston, Adel and Taylor, JJ., concur.
#### Emma J. Correll and Joseph Grant, Jr., Appellants, v. John Richardson, Respondent.

Judgment and order reversed and new trial granted, with costs to appellants to abide event. Held, the evidence was insufficient to show that defendant had been directed by the county superintendent of highways or authorized by the town board to enter upon plaintiffs’ lands and construct a new ditch to drain the water from the highway, and without such direction and authorization defendant’s entry was unlawful and a trespass, for which defendant is liable personally and the town is not liable. (See Highway Law, § 57.)* Hence, it was reversible error to refuse to charge the jury as requested by plaintiffs’ counsel, “That there is no evidence here that the highway commissioner was authorized to dig this ditch by action of the town board, and that there is no record of the action; that the town is not liable unless he was directed to dig this ditch by the county superintendent, and also by the town board of Huron, under section 57 of the Highway Law.” All concurred.

*

 See Consol. Laws, chap. 25 (Laws of 1909, chap. 30), § 57.—[Rep.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY HIGH

 9,363

 6,866

 5,528

 4,449

 4,552

 5,159

 9,412

 11,233

 6,073

 5,170

 3,243

 1,222

 555

 381

 319

 623

 3,085

 3,875

 7,078

 7,059

 8,399

 8,049

 8,586

 10,027

 10,359

 12,868

 9,934

 9,408

 6,749

 5,660

 4,085

 3,984

 1,682

 811

 466

 356

 352

 520

 703

 500

 409

 375

 298

 266

 257

 237

 221

 221

 208

 235

 595

 914

 1,043

 1,058

 1,201

 983

 1,951

 2,516

 2,677

 1,799

 678

 411

 5,965

 3,720

 2,266

 1,695

 1,418

 1,644

 3,576

 4,986

 2,859

 1,974

 1,589

 554

 355

 310

 274

 311

 752

 1,082

 2,202

 3,587

 5,064

 4,650

 5,180

 5,692

 5,655

 7,047

 6,297

 6,459

 4,375

 2,687

 1,664

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

JANUARY 2005 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: March 4, 2005

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

PORT CHICAGO TOP IN SUISUN BAY
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY HIGH

 11,172

 10,667

 13,347

 16,182

 20,901

 22,075

 24,036

 24,744

 24,183

 20,996

 20,552

 18,620

 15,063

 12,395

 5,387

 16,591

 18,799

 20,824

 19,603

 23,720

 23,043

 22,917

 21,487

 20,026

 21,491

 23,102

 20,043

 18,420

 16,573

 16,633

 16,208

 2,634

 2,734

 4,860

 3,435

 4,954

 6,670

 6,951

 7,103

 6,487

 4,768

 5,951

 3,823

 2,614

 3,399

 2,022

 2,459

 7,341

 6,987

 6,929

 7,240

 7,105

 3,683

 4,165

 6,497

 6,815

 7,006

 6,741

 6,359

 6,206

 6,032

 6,020

 7,113

 6,841

 7,521

 7,426

 9,772

 10,868

 13,712

 14,394

 12,670

 11,331

 11,645

 10,421

 6,294

 6,800

 4,081

 7,878

 11,918

 11,568

 11,991

 13,268

 13,729

 13,405

 10,976

 13,113

 13,853

 14,179

 13,285

 12,229

 11,362

 10,954

 10,046

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

JULY 2010 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: August 3, 2010

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

PORT CHICAGO TOP IN SUISUN BAY
#### § 6.52 Cooperative advertising.

An arrangement in which an industry member participates with a retailer in paying for an advertisement placed by the retailer constitutes paying the retailer for advertising within the meaning of the Act.
### §1036. Pasteurization and labeling of egg products at official plants

#### (a) Contents of label

Egg products inspected at any official plant under the authority of this chapter and found to be not adulterated shall be pasteurized before they leave the official plant, except as otherwise permitted by regulations of the Secretary, and shall at the time they leave the official plant, bear in distinctly legible form on their shipping containers or immediate containers, or both, when required by regulations of the Secretary, the official inspection legend and official plant number, of the plant where the products were processed, and such other information as the Secretary may require by regulations to describe the products adequately and to assure that they will not have false or misleading labeling.

#### (b) False or misleading or use of nonapproved labeling or containers; determination by Secretary; procedures applicable; appeal

No labeling or container shall be used for egg products at official plants if it is false or misleading or has not been approved as required by the regulations of the Secretary. If the Secretary has reason to believe that any labeling or the size or form of any container in use or proposed for use with respect to egg products at any official plant is false or misleading in any particular, he may direct that such use be withheld unless the labeling or container is modified in such manner as he may prescribe so that it will not be false or misleading. If the person using or proposing to use the labeling or container does not accept the determination of the Secretary, such person may request a hearing, but the use of the labeling or container shall, if the Secretary so directs, be withheld pending hearing and final determination by the Secretary. Any such determination by the Secretary shall be conclusive unless, within thirty days after receipt of notice of such final determination, the person adversely affected thereby appeals to the United States court of appeals for the circuit in which such person has its principal place of business or to the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit. The provisions of section 194 of title 7,1 shall be applicable to appeals taken under this section.

(Pub. L. 91–597, §7, Dec. 29, 1970, 84 Stat. 1625.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

This chapter, referred to in subsec. (a), was in the original "this Act", meaning Pub. L. 91–597, Dec. 29, 1970, 84 Stat. 1620, which is classified principally to this chapter. For complete classification of this Act to the Code, see Short Title note set out under section 1031 of this title and Tables.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date

For effective date of this section, see section 29 of Pub. L. 91–597, set out as a note under section 1031 of this title.

1 So in original. The comma probably should not appear.