alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 114th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 3940 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

114th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 3940

To amend title XVIII of the Social Security Act to authorize a blanket 
 meaningful use significant hardship exception for the 2015 reporting 
period due to the delay in timely publication of the Stage 2 meaningful 
                               use rule.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            November 5, 2015

Mr. Tom Price of Georgia (for himself, Mrs. Black, Mrs. Blackburn, Mr. 
  Roe of Tennessee, Mr. Harris, Mr. Jenkins of West Virginia, and Mr. 
 Heck of Nevada) introduced the following bill; which was referred to 
 the Committee on Ways and Means, and in addition to the Committee on 
Energy and Commerce, for a period to be subsequently determined by the 
  Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall 
           within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To amend title XVIII of the Social Security Act to authorize a blanket 
 meaningful use significant hardship exception for the 2015 reporting 
period due to the delay in timely publication of the Stage 2 meaningful 
                               use rule.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Meaningful Use Hardship Relief Act 
of 2015''.

SEC. 2. AUTHORIZING A BLANKET MEANINGFUL USE SIGNIFICANT HARDSHIP 
              EXCEPTION FOR 2015.

    Sections 1848(a)(7)(B) and 1886(b)(3)(B)(ix)(II) of the Social 
Security Act (42 U.S.C. 1395w-4(a)(7)(B), 1395ww(b)(3)(B)(ix)(II)) are 
each amended by inserting ``(or through a blanket exception with 
respect to the 2015 EHR reporting period)'' after ``on a case-by-case 
basis''.
                                 <all>
```
#### § 30.812 May a covered Part E employee claim for subsequent periods of compensable wage-loss?

A covered Part E employee previously awarded compensation for wage-loss under § 30.811 may file for additional compensation for wage-loss suffered by the employee during periods subsequent to a period for which a wage-loss claim for the employee has already been adjudicated by OWCP. However, no compensation for wage-loss shall be awarded for any period following the year during which the covered Part E employee attained normal retirement age for purposes of the Social Security Act as described in § 30.801(b).
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

DAY ELEV

 584.55

 585.05

 585.01

 585.69

 585.54

 584.60

 584.13

 584.51

 583.81

 584.75

 584.23

 584.54

 583.72

 584.44

 583.90

 584.59

 585.48

 584.97

 584.22

 583.99

 583.25

 583.36

 584.41

 584.32

 584.48

 584.91

 585.16

 583.86

 583.62

 583.77

 22,229

 22,538

 22,513

 22,940

 22,846

 22,260

 21,970

 22,205

 21,775

 22,353

 22,032

 22,223

 21,720

 22,161

 21,829

 22,254

 22,808

 22,488

 22,026

 21,884

 21,435

 21,502

 22,143

 22,087

 22,186

 22,451

 22,607

 21,805

 21,659

 21,750

STORAGE

+203

+309

-25

+427

-94

-586

-290

+235

-430

+578

-321

+191

-503

+441

-332

+425

+554

-320

-462

-142

-449

+67

+641

-56

+99

+265

+156

-802

-146

+91

CHANGE

8,535

8,557

8,872

9,098

8,838

8,587

8,727

9,001

8,658

9,171

8,751

8,977

8,614

9,105

8,713

9,091

9,176

8,732

8,643

8,827

8,132

8,329

8,631

7,927

8,000

8,078

7,998

7,094

7,374

7,506

INFLOW

 8,426

 8,395

 8,878

 8,878

 8,879

 8,877

 8,867

 8,877

 8,869

 8,874

 8,907

 8,876

 8,863

 8,878

 8,875

 8,872

 8,892

 8,887

 8,874

 8,898

 8,355

 8,290

 8,304

 7,950

 7,946

 7,940

 7,915

 7,494

 7,444

 7,457

POWER

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

SPILL

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

FISHTRAP

 7

 6

 7

 5

 6

 5

 6

 6

 6

 6

 6

 5

 5

 5

 5

 5

 5

 6

 2

 1

 3

 5

 4

 5

 4

 4

 4

 4

 4

 3

C.F.S.

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

SEPTEMBER 2004 KESWICK RESERVOIR DAILY OPERATIONS RUN DATE: February 28, 2005

RES.

EVAP

C.F.S.

COMPUTED*

ACRE-FEET

RELEASE - C.F.S. 

TOTALS -276 255,742 255,737 0 0 145

ACRE-FEET -276 507,264 507,254 0 0 288

SUMMARY

RELEASE (ACRE-FEET)

POWER 507,254

SPILL 0

 22,026

FISH TRAP 0

SPRING

CR. P. P.

RELEASE (1)

 2,019

 1,798

 1,011

 986

 986

 967

 1,098

 1,008

 1,043

 1,065

 1,546

 1,051

 1,142

 1,076

 1,037

 1,051

 1,054

 1,033

 1,562

 1,585

 1,578

 1,580

 1,490

 1,517

 2,181

 2,236

 3,281

 3,300

 3,310

 3,316

 47,907

 95,024

*COMPUTED INFLOW IS SUM OF CHANGE IN STORAGE, RELEASES, AND EVAPORATION.

(1) EVAPORATION RECORDS TAKEN FROM SHASTA PAN.

SHASTA

RELEASE

C.F.S

 6,369

 6,759

 7,862

 8,055

 7,920

 7,761

 7,497

 7,980

 7,479

 8,055

 7,148

 7,936

 7,269

 8,037

 7,213

 7,928

 8,065

 7,841

 7,114

 7,333

 6,464

 6,779

 6,990

 6,305

 5,707

 5,796

 4,706

 3,679

 4,070

 4,203

 206,320

 409,236
EXHIBIT 12
<TABLE>

                                U S WEST, Inc.
                      RATIO OF EARNINGS TO FIXED CHARGES
                             Dollars in Millions)
<CAPTION>

                                                                 Quarter Ended
                                                           9/30/95     9/30/94
                                                         --------     --------


<S>                                            <C>        <C>

Income before income taxes                     $     538  $     514
Interest expense (net of amounts capitalized)        137        104
Interest factor on rentals (1/3)                      22         23
Equity losses in unconsolidated ventures               2          -
Guaranteed minority interest expense                   2          -
                                                --------   --------
Earnings                                       $     701  $     641

Interest expense                                     156        114
Interest factor on rentals (1/3)                      22         23
Guaranteed minority interest expense                   2          -
                                                --------   --------
Fixed charges                                  $     180  $     137

Ratio of earnings to fixed charges                  3.89       4.68
--------------------------------------------    --------   --------

<CAPTION>

                                 Year-to-Date
                                                           9/30/95     9/30/94
                                                         --------     --------


<S>                                             <C>        <C>


Income before income taxes                      $   1,590  $   1,645
Interest expense (net of amounts capitalized)         404        323
Interest factor on rentals (1/3)                       71         70
Equity losses in unconsolidated ventures               28          -
Guaranteed minority interest expense                    2          -
                                                 --------   --------
Earnings                                        $   2,095  $   2,038

Interest expense                                      448        348
Interest factor on rentals (1/3)                       71         70
Guaranteed minority interest expense                    2          -
                                                 --------   --------
Fixed charges                                   $     521  $     418

Ratio of earnings to fixed charges                   4.02       4.88
 --------------------------------------------    --------   --------

</TABLE>
#### Abner Symmons, Appellant, v. Katherine L. A. Symmons, Respondent.

Order unanimously affirmed, with $20 costs and disbursements. No opinion. Present — Peck, P. J., Glennon, Cohn, Van Voorhis and Shientag, JJ.
I 

114TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 3724 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to prohibit the Commissioner 

of the Internal Revenue Service from rehiring any employee of the 

Internal Revenue Service who was involuntarily separated from service 

for misconduct. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

OCTOBER 8, 2015 

Mrs. NOEM (for herself and Mr. ROSKAM) introduced the following bill; which 

was referred to the Committee on Ways and Means 

A BILL 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to prohibit 

the Commissioner of the Internal Revenue Service from 

rehiring any employee of the Internal Revenue Service 

who was involuntarily separated from service for misconduct. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Ensuring Integrity in 

5 the IRS Workforce Act of 2015’’. 


tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 3724 IH

1 SEC. 2. PROHIBITION ON REHIRING ANY EMPLOYEE OF 

2 THE INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE WHO WAS 

3 INVOLUNTARILY SEPARATED FROM SERVICE 

4 FOR MISCONDUCT. 

5 (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 7804 of the Internal Rev6 enue Code of 1986 is amended by adding at the end the 

7 following new subsection: 

8 ‘‘(d) PROHIBITION ON REHIRING EMPLOYEES INVOL9 UNTARILY SEPARATED.—The Commissioner may not em10 ploy any individual previously employed by the Commis11 sioner who was removed for misconduct under this sub12 chapter or chapter 43 or chapter 75 of title 5, United 

13 States Code, or whose employment was terminated under 

14 section 1203 of the Internal Revenue Service Restruc15 turing and Reform Act of 1998 (26 U.S.C. 7804 note).’’. 

16 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

17 subsection (a) shall apply with respect to any employee 

18 removed from employment before, on, or after the date 

19 of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
### §1194. Repealed. Pub. L. 98–24, §2(c)(2), Apr. 26, 1983, 97 Stat. 182

Section, Pub. L. 92–255, title V, §504, as added Pub. L. 95–461, §6(b)(1), Oct. 14, 1978, 92 Stat. 1270, related to review by the Secretary of programs and activities. See section 290aa–5 of Title 42, The Public Health and Welfare.
§ 10.403 When and how is compensation for partial disability paid? ( a ) 5 U.S.C. 8115 outlines how compensation for partial disability is determined. If the employee has actual earnings which fairly and reasonably represent his or her wage-earning capacity, those earnings will form the basis for payment of compensation for partial disability. (See §§ 10.500 through 10.521 concerning return to work.) If the employee's actual earnings do not fairly and reasonably represent his or her wage-earning capacity, or if the employee has no actual earnings, OWCP uses the factors stated in 5 U.S.C. 8115 to select a position which represents his or her wage-earning capacity, which include the nature of the injury, the degree of physical impairment, the usual employment, the age of the employee, the employee's qualifications for other employment and the availability of suitable employment. However, OWCP will not secure employment for the employee in the position selected for establishing a wage-earning capacity.
( b ) Compensation for partial disability is payable as a percentage of the difference between the employee's pay rate for compensation purposes and the employee's wage-earning capacity. The percentage is 662 ⁄ 3 percent of this difference if the employee has no dependents, or 75 percent of this difference if the employee has at least one dependent.
( c ) The formula which OWCP uses to compute the compensation payable for partial disability employs the following terms: Pay rate for compensation purposes, which is defined in § 10.5(s) of this part; current pay rate, which means the salary or wages for the job held at the time of injury at the time of the determination; and earnings, which means the employee's actual earnings, or the salary or pay rate of the position selected by OWCP as representing the employee's wage-earning capacity.
( d ) The employee's wage-earning capacity in terms of percentage is computed by dividing the employee's earnings by the current pay rate. The comparison of earnings and “current” pay rate for the job held at the time of injury need not be made as of the beginning of partial disability. OWCP may use any convenient date for making the comparison as long as both wage rates are in effect on the date used for comparison.
( e ) The employee's wage-earning capacity in terms of dollars is computed by first multiplying the pay rate for compensation purposes by the percentage of wage-earning capacity. The resulting dollar amount is then subtracted from the pay rate for compensation purposes to obtain the employee's loss of wage-earning capacity.
### §§2931, 2932. Omitted

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Sections were omitted in the general amendment of the Elementary and Secondary Education Act of 1965, Pub. L. 89–10, by Pub. L. 103–382, title I, §101, Oct. 20, 1994, 108 Stat. 3519.

Section 2931, Pub. L. 89–10, title I, §1521, as added Pub. L. 100–297, title I, §1001, Apr. 28, 1988, 102 Stat. 206, related to State uses of funds.

Section 2932, Pub. L. 89–10, title I, §1522, as added Pub. L. 100–297, title I, §1001, Apr. 28, 1988, 102 Stat. 206, related to State applications.
**UN PUBLISHED** 
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

**No. 13**  **- 6730** 

GARY BUTERRA WILLIAMS , Petitioner

– Appellant ,
v. WILLIAM C. SMITH, Superintendent , Respondent

- Appellee
.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia , at Richmond
. Henry E. Hudson , District Judge. ( 3:11

- cv - 00709

- HEH )

Submitted : August 22, 2013 Decided: August 27, 2013

Before MOTZ, DIAZ , and FLOYD, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by un published per curiam opinion
. Gary Buterra Williams, Appellant Pro Se. Robert H. Anderson, III, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF VIRGINIA, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM: Gary Buterra Williams seeks to a ppeal the district
court ’ s order s dismissing his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (2006) petition without prejudice and denying reconsideration
. The order s are not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. See 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c )(1) (A) (2006) . A certificate of appealability will not issue absent “ a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right. ” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2006)
. When the district court denies relief on the merits, a prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that the district court’s assessment of the constitutional claims is debatable or wrong. Slack v. McDaniel , 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000); see Miller

- El v. Cockrell , 537 U.S. 322, 336

- 38 (2003). When the district court denies relief on procedural grounds, the prisoner must demonstrate both that the dispositive procedural ruling is debatable, and that the petition states a debatable claim of the denial of a constitut ional right. Slack , 529 U.S. at 484

- 85. We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Williams has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal3 c ontentions are adequately presented in the materials before th is court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSE D
#### § 10.527 Does OWCP verify reports of earnings?

To make proper determinations of an employee's entitlement to benefits, OWCP may verify the earnings reported by the employee through a variety of means, including but not limited to computer matches with the Office of Personnel Management and inquiries to the Social Security Administration. Also, OWCP may perform computer matches with records of State agencies, including but not limited to workers' compensation administrations, to determine whether private employers are paying workers' compensation insurance premiums for recipients of benefits under the FECA.
Exhibit 32.1
 Certification Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
  /s/ Danny Wright

Danny WrightChief Executive Officer
June 11, 2015

Mr. Richard Scott Nelson Scott Nelson Productions, Inc.

P.O. Box 1198 Bend, OR 97709

Dear Mr. Nelson:

This letter is to inform you that we are unable to process your request for an exemption. It explains why we can not process your request and what you should do in the next 30 days.

Why We Can Not Process Your Request

We entered your May 28, 2015, exemption request into the public docket (No. FAA-2015- 1961), but we are unable to process your request any further. The information you sent does not comply with the requirements of § 11.81 (copy enclosed). For us to consider the request any further, you must send us all of the following:

 The specific section or sections of 14 CFR from which you seek relief, the extent of the relief you seek, and the reason you seek relief.

 Any additional information, views, or arguments available to support your request.

What You Should Do

If you want us to process your request any further, you must send the information described earlier to reach us within 30 days. Please note that § 11.63(d) requires you to send your petition for exemption at least 120 days before the proposed effective date of the exemption.2

If We Do Not Hear From You

If we do not hear from you within 30 days, we will close the docket without notifying you further. If you have any questions or require additional time, you may call (202) 267-9677.

Sincerely,

/s/

Brenda Robeson Program Analyst, Airmen and Airspace Rules Division

Enclosure
United States Court of Appeals

FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

_____________

No. 98-1225EM

_____________

In re: Balsam Corporation, *

*

Debtor, *

____________________ *

*

United States of America, *

*

Claimant-Appellant, *

* Appeal from the United States

v. * District Court for the Eastern

* District of Missouri.

Balsam Corporation; *

* [UNPUBLISHED]

Debtor-Appellee, *

*

Procedo International Gesellschaft Fur *

Exportfactoring MBH, *

*

Claimant-Appellee. *

_____________

 Submitted: September 24, 1998

Filed: September 30, 1998 

_____________

Before McMILLIAN, HEANEY, and FAGG, Circuit Judges.

_____________

PER CURIAM.
-2-

The Government appeals following the district court's affirmance of the

bankruptcy court's denial of the Internal Revenue Service's effort to reclaim a refund

for a deferred tax loss as an administrative expense. Having reviewed the record and

the parties' submissions, we believe the district court's decision was correct and we

affirm for the reasons stated in the district court's memorandum and order without

further discussion. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.

A true copy.

Attest:

CLERK, U.S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.
### §9578. Scientific or technical employees

#### (a) In general

The Director may appoint, for terms not to exceed 6 years (without regard to the provisions of title 5 governing appointment in the competitive service) and may compensate (without regard to the provisions of chapter 51 and subchapter III of chapter 53 of such title relating to classification and General Schedule pay rates) such scientific or technical employees to carry out the functions of the Institute or the office, board, committee, or center, respectively, if—

(1) at least 30 days prior to the appointment of any such employee, public notice is given of the availability of such position and an opportunity is provided for qualified individuals to apply and compete for such position;

(2) the rate of basic pay for such employees does not exceed the maximum rate of basic pay payable for positions at GS–15, as determined in accordance with section 5376 of title 5, except that not more than 7 individuals appointed under this section may be paid at a rate that does not exceed the rate of basic pay for level III of the Executive Schedule;

(3) the appointment of such employee is necessary (as determined by the Director on the basis of clear and convincing evidence) to provide the Institute or the office, board, committee, or center with scientific or technical expertise which could not otherwise be obtained by the Institute or the office, board, committee, or center through the competitive service; and

(4) the total number of such employees does not exceed 40 individuals or 1/5 of the number of full-time, regular scientific or professional employees of the Institute, whichever is greater.

#### (b) Duties of employees

All employees described in subsection (a) shall work on activities of the Institute or the office, board, committee, or center, and shall not be reassigned to other duties outside the Institute or the office, board, committee, or center during their term.

(Pub. L. 107–279, title I, §188, Nov. 5, 2002, 116 Stat. 1973.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

GS–15, referred to in subsec. (a)(2), is contained in the General Schedule, which is set out under section 5332 of Title 5, Government Organization and Employees.

Level III of the Executive Schedule, referred to in subsec. (a)(2), is set out in section 5314 of Title 5, Government Organization and Employees.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### References to Maximum Rate Under 5 U.S.C. 5376

For reference to maximum rate under section 5376 of Title 5, Government Organization and Employees, see section 2(d)(3) of Pub. L. 110–372, set out as an Effective Date of 2008 Amendment note under section 5376 of Title 5.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY HIGH

 8,189

 11,356

 11,388

 12,624

 15,305

 14,217

 12,290

 10,739

 9,473

 6,528

 5,138

 5,121

 4,013

 5,009

 8,160

 10,501

 10,320

 4,156

 2,089

 1,431

 626

 475

 406

 365

 334

 314

 303

 282

 324

 349

 541

 2,262

 2,674

 2,781

 3,389

 4,058

 5,634

 3,931

 3,461

 3,156

 1,855

 936

 715

 576

 575

 1,143

 2,347

 940

 446

 421

 396

 392

 358

 322

 294

 278

 264

 265

 261

 260

 264

 272

 4,370

 5,550

 6,023

 7,070

 9,347

 9,602

 8,140

 6,672

 6,388

 3,976

 2,896

 2,280

 1,649

 2,012

 3,476

 5,196

 4,966

 1,766

 856

 656

 470

 400

 358

 323

 302

 288

 280

 273

 281

 284

 314

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

JANUARY 2019 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: February 11, 2019

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

PITTSBURG TOP ON THE SACRAMENTO RIVER