# EUR-Lex - 52012PC0110 - EN

*|*

# 52012PC0110

**COMMUNICATION FROM THE COMMISSIONTO THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENTpursuant to Article 294(6) of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Unionconcerning the position of the Council on the adoption of a proposal for a Decision of the European Parliament and of the Council of amending Decision no 573/2007/EC establishing the European Refugee Fund for the period 2008 to 2013 as part of the General programme "Solidarity and Management of Migration Flows" and repealing Council Decision 2004/904/EC (“establishment of a Joint EU Resettlement Programme”) /* COM/2012/0110 final - 2009/0127 (COD) */**

			*

			*

2009/0127 (COD)

COMMUNICATION FROM THE COMMISSION
TO THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT
pursuant to Article 294(6) of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European
Union
concerning the

position of the Council on the adoption of
a proposal for a Decision of the European Parliament and of the Council of
amending Decision no 573/2007/EC establishing the European Refugee Fund for the
period 2008 to 2013 as part of the General programme "Solidarity and
Management of Migration Flows" and repealing Council Decision 2004/904/EC
(“establishment of a Joint EU Resettlement Programme”)

1.           Background

Date of transmission of the proposal to the European Parliament and to the Council (document COM(2009)456 final – 2009/0127 COD): || 3 September 2009

Date of the position of the European Parliament, first reading: || 18 May 2010

Foreseen date of adoption of the position of the Council: || 8 March 2012

2.           Objective
of the proposal from the Commission

The objective of the Commission proposal is
twofold, on one hand to increase the resettlement of refugees to the European
Union – both in absolute numbers and in the number of Member States that have
national resettlement schemes – and on the other hand to send a strong
political signal about the importance the EU attaches to providing durable
solutions to refugees, in particular the most vulnerable ones. In order to
achieve this, a Joint EU Resettlement Programme is to be set up. Its creation
is to result in a better coordinated EU approach to resettlement.

3.           Comments
on the position of the Council

The Council's position is a result of a
long negotiation process. Following the first reading position of the European
Parliament (issued on 18 May 2010), the co-legislators did not reach a
compromise due to the institutional issue of the choice of procedure for the
establishment of annual resettlement priorities at European level (delegated
vs. implementing acts procedure). The stalemate in negotiations was overcome
with the proposal submitted by the Presidency in late December 2011. The
compromise proposal is based on the fact that the European Refugee Fund runs
only up to the end of 2013. This means that the pledging exercise to take place
in 2012 is the last one under the present Fund. This, in turn, implies that
there is no need to establish a procedure for setting annual resettlement
priorities, as such priorities will only be defined once before the present
Fund ceases to exist. The solution found is to insert the specific EU
resettlement priorities for 2013 as an integral part of the Decision in Annex
I.

Further to the first reading position of
the European Parliament (adopted on 18 May 2010), an agreement on the substance
of the proposal was finally reached between the co-legislators on the
outstanding issues in a Trilogue on 9 February 2012. The only open point
concerned the legal basis for this proposal.

On 10 February the Chairman of the LIBE
Committee sent a letter to the Council Presidency confirming the agreement of
the rapporteurs and the Shadow-rapporteurs on the text supported by the
Council, and stating that if that text was to be transmitted formally to the
European Parliament during a forthcoming plenary session as the Council's First
Reading Position for this legislative proposal, he would recommend that the
Members of the LIBE committee and subsequently the plenary session accept it
without amendments. Coreper met on 15 February to discuss the legal basis of
the proposal. Coreper on 22 February confirmed the agreement on the text to be
submitted to the Council for adoption.

The main differences between the Common
Position and the original Commission proposal are set out below.

Establishment of common EU priorities (Article 1(1)(a))

The Common Position lists the resettlement
priorities in the Decision as opposed to the initial proposal by the Commission
according to which the common EU resettlement priorities were to be established
in the comitology procedure on an annual basis. Since the current European
Refugee Fund covers the period until the end of 2013, the Decision establishes resettlement
priorities for one year only. It is, therefore, in line with Commission's
proposal to list the priorities for that year in this Decision. A mechanism for
the establishment of the common EU resettlement priorities is provided for in
the instrument creating a new Asylum and Migration Fund for the period
2014-2020.

Common EU resettlement priorities for
2013 (Article 1(1)(a))

The common EU resettlement priorities for
2013 as set out in the Common Position cover 3 sets of priorities: 1) persons
from a country or region designated for the implementation of a Regional
Protection Programme, 2) persons belonging to a specific vulnerable group,3)
refugees from a specific country or region. The first two sets of priorities
are formulated as general ones and they draw closely on the categories set out
in Article 13(3) of Decision No 573/2007/EC establishing the European Refugee
Fund for the period 2008 to 2013. In comparison with Decision No 573/2007/EC
the Common Position adds the following vulnerable groups to the list: survivors
of violence and torture as well as persons in need of emergency resettlement or
urgent resettlement for legal or physical protection needs.

The third set of priorities is referred to
as specific common EU priorities for 2013 and the list of these priorities can
be found in the Annex to this Decision. This list is established on the basis
of the UNHCR resettlement criteria and the UNHCR annual resettlement forecast
taking into account where EU common action would have a significant impact in
addressing the protection needs. This is in line with the Commission's
proposal.

The fixed amount to be received for each
resettled person (Article 1(1)(b))

The Common Position amends the Commission
proposal by proposing a higher fixed amount for each person resettled according
to the priorities to be received from the Fund by those Member States that have
not used the Fund for this purpose before. Whereas Article 13(3) of Decision No
573/2007/EC establishing the European Refugee Fund for the period 2008 to 2013
provides that Member States receive a fixed amount of 4000 EUR for each person
resettled according to the priorities set out in the Decision, the Common
Position foresees an amount of 6000 EUR for each resettled person for those
Member States which shall receive the fixed amount from the Fund for the first
time and an amount of 5000 EUR for those Member States which have received the
fixed amount from the Fund only once before. The purpose of this amendment is
to encourage those Member States that have not done so until now to launch
resettlement programmes. This is in general in line with the aim of the
Commission, namely to ensure increased resettlement to the EU by larger number
of Member States.

The legal basis of the proposal

The Commission
proposal of 2009 was originally based on Article 63 (2) (b) TEC but the Omnibus
Communication on consequences of the entry into force of the Treaty of Lisbon
for ongoing interinstitutional decision-making procedures indicated Articles 78
and 80 TFEU (the latter on internal EU solidarity) as the new legal basis. The
reference to this article, together with article 78 TFEU, aimed at underlining
that the purpose of the proposed measures was to ensure a "balance of
efforts" as mentioned in former article 63 TEC. However, the Council is of
the opinion that the correct lisbonisation of the legal basis is art. 78 (2)
(g) TFEU, and that art. 80 TFEU cannot constitute a legal basis, not even a
complementary one.

On 13 February the DK Presidency issued a
paper with two options, one of which was to propose an inclusion of a recital
including a reference to Article 80 TFEU. The Coreper on 15 February decided to
keep only art. 78 (2) (g) TFEU as the legal basis for the proposal. This
position was confirmed by Coreper on 22 February. The text was forwarded for
the adoption by the Council on March 8.

Although not in line with the Omnibus
Communication, the Commission may support the legal basis to be composed solely
of art. 78 (2) (g) TFEU as the non-inclusion of Article 80 TFEU which does not
as such constitute a legal basis does not affect the substance of the proposal
and is in line with the equivalence tables of the Lisbon Treaty. Furthermore,
it is consistent with recent MFF proposals in home affairs area which have been
adopted with no reference to article 80 TFEU. The recital as added can be
supported by the Commission as it underlines the importance of Solidarity in
the Common European Asylum System and makes explicitly reference to art. 80
TFEU.

4.
Commission declaration

Within the
framework of the negotiations on the recital referring to article 80 TFEU and
the principle of solidarity, the European Parliament asked the Commission to
issue a Declaration on its future right of initiative with regard to the choice
of legal bases.

The
Commission agreed to this request. The text of the Declaration is the
following:

DECLARATION BY THE COMMISSION

The Commission, in
a spirit of compromise and in order to ensure the immediate adoption of the
proposal, supports the final text; however it
notes that this is without prejudice to its right of initiative with regard to
the choice of legal bases, in particular in reference to the future use of
Article 80 TFEU.

5.           Conclusion

The Common Position satisfies the
Commission's original objective to ensure more refugee resettlement to the
European Union by increasing both the numbers of resettled refugees and the
number of the Member States having ongoing national resettlement schemes. This
allows for more strategic resettlement to the EU. The substance of the
Council's position is, therefore broadly in line with the Commission's proposal
and can be supported.