alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                            TRIO-TECH INTERNATIONAL
                                 EXHIBIT  11.1
             STATEMENT REGARDING COMPUTATION OF PER SHARE EARNINGS
                                  (unaudited)
                 (In Thousands, except Earnings per Share Data)

                                   SIX  MONTHS ENDED      THREE MONTHS ENDED
                                  -------------------     ------------------
                                   DEC. 29,  DEC. 30,  DEC. 29,  DEC. 30,
                                     1995      1994      1995      1994
                                   -------   -------   -------   -------

<S>                                <C>       <C>       <C>       <C>
Net income                         $    318  $    223  $    198  $    188


Primary earnings per share:


  Weighted average number of
    common shares
       outstanding                    1,186     1,153     1,190     1,154

  Dilutive effect of stock
    options and warrants after
      application of treasury
        stock method
                                         82        22        72        32
                                   --------  --------  --------  --------


Number of shares used to compute
  primary earnings
    per share                         1,268     1,175     1,262     1,186
                                   ========  ========  ========  ========

                                   

Primary earnings per share:
   Earnings  per share             $   0.25  $   0.19  $   0.16  $   0.16
                                   ========  ========  ========  ========

Fully diluted earnings per share:


  Weighted average number of
    common shares
       outstanding                    1,186     1,153     1,190     1,154


  Dilutive effect of stock
    options and warrants after
       application of treasury
          stock method
                                         90        22        58        32
                                   --------  --------  --------  --------


Number of shares used to compute
  fully diluted
    earnings per share                1,276     1,175     1,248     1,186
                                   ========  ========  ========  ========

Fully diluted earnings per share:
    Earnings  per share            $   0.25  $   0.19  $   0.16  $   0.16
                                   ========  ========  ========  ========

</TABLE>
<PAGE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OF GANTOS, INC. AS OF, AND FOR THE FISCAL YEAR ENDED,
JANUARY 31, 1998 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS AND ACCOMPANYING NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JAN-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             FEB-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               JAN-31-1998
<CASH>                                           1,295
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   19,198
<ALLOWANCES>                                     (591)
<INVENTORY>                                     22,540
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                50,647
<PP&E>                                          62,662
<DEPRECIATION>                                (48,115)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  65,194
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           16,116
<BONDS>                                         27,398
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            76
<OTHER-SE>                                      21,604
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    65,194
<SALES>                                        161,966
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               161,966
<CGS>                                          137,237
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  137,237
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               2,341
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (10,409)
<INCOME-TAX>                                       615
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (9,794)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (9,794)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (1.30)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (1.30)
        

</TABLE>
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

MIDDLE DISTRICT

MANDY MICHELLE DEROSA

v.

WILLIAM JOSEPH GORDON AND

KERRON REGIS,

Intervenor

PETITION OF: WILLIAM JOSEPH

GORDON :

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

: No. 612 MAL 2022

Petition for Allowance of Appeal from the Order of the Superior Court

MANDY MICHELLE DEROSA

v.

WILLIAM JOSEPH GORDON AND

KERRON REGIS,

Intervenor

PETITION OF: WILLIAM JOSEPH

GORDON :

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

: No. 613 MAL 2022

Petition for Allowance of Appeal from the Order of the Superior Court

KERRON REGIS

v.

MANDY MICHELLE DEROSA AND

WILLIAM JOSEPH GORDON :

:

:

:

:

:

:

: No. 614 MAL 2022

Petition for Allowance of Appeal

from the Order of the Superior Court[ 612 MAL 2022, 613 MAL 2022, 614 MAL 2022 and 615 MAL 2022 ]

- 2

PETITION OF: WILLIAM JOSEPH

GORDON :

:

:

:

KERRON REGIS

v.

MANDY MICHELLE DEROSA AND

WILLIAM JOSEPH GORDON

PETITION OF: WILLIAM JOSEPH

GORDON :

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

: No. 615 MAL 2022

Petition for Allowance of Appeal from the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW , this 16th day of February, 2023

, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal

is DENIED

.
Exhibit 3.1
 AMENDED AND RESTATED CERTIFICATE
 OF
 INCORPORATION
 OF
 DUCOMMUN LABARGE TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
 ARTICLE I
NAME OF CORPORATION
 Corporation
  ARTICLE II
REGISTERED OFFICE
  ARTICLE III
PURPOSE
  ARTICLE IV
AUTHORIZED CAPITAL STOCK
  ARTICLE V
BOARD POWER REGARDING BYLAWS




---



##### 



ARTICLE VI
ELECTION OF DIRECTORS
  ARTICLE VII
LIABILITY
  ARTICLE VIII
CORPORATE POWER
  ARTICLE IX
INCORPORATOR
  
 2
---

Exhibit 99.8
Date: March 31, 2010 CONSENT OF VELASQUEZ SPRING United States Securities and Exchange Commission Gentlemen: In  connection with Silver Wheaton Corp.s (the Company) Annual Report on Form  40-F for the year ended December 31, 2009 (the Annual Report), I, Velasquez  Spring, P. Eng., Senior Geologist of Watts, Griffis and McOuat Limited, hereby  consent to the inclusion in, or incorporation by reference into, and the use of  my name in connection with the preparation of the following documents / reports: 1.
     Resource and reserve  estimates of the San Dimas Mines;2.
     Technical report  dated January 30, 2009, entitled *An Audit of the Mineral Reserves/Resources  Tayoltita, Santa Rita and San Antonio Mines as of December 31, 2008 for Silver  Wheaton Corp.*;3.
    The Annual Report; and4.
     The Companys  Registration statement on Form S-8 (File No. 333-128128).  Yours truly,/s/ Velasquez SpringVelasquez Spring, P. EngSenior Geologist


---
IB 

Union Calendar No. 360 

114TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 3791 

[Report No. 114–474] 

To raise the consolidated assets threshold under the small bank holding 

company policy statement, and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

OCTOBER 21, 2015 

Mrs. LOVE (for herself and Mr. LUETKEMEYER) introduced the following bill; 

which was referred to the Committee on Financial Services 

MARCH 23, 2016 

Additional sponsors: Mr. SESSIONS, Mr. WILLIAMS, and Mr. STIVERS

MARCH 23, 2016 

Committed to the Committee of the Whole House on the State of the Union 

and ordered to be printed 


sradovich on DSK3TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 3791 RH

A BILL 

To raise the consolidated assets threshold under the small 

bank holding company policy statement, and for other 

purposes. 


sradovich on DSK3TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
3 

•HR 3791 RH

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. CHANGES REQUIRED TO SMALL BANK HOLD4 ING COMPANY POLICY STATEMENT ON AS5 SESSMENT OF FINANCIAL AND MANAGERIAL 

6 FACTORS. 

7 (a) IN GENERAL.—Before the end of the 6-month pe8 riod beginning on the date of the enactment of this Act, 

9 the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System 

10 shall revise the Small Bank Holding Company Policy 

11 Statement on Assessment of Financial and Managerial 

12 Factors (12 C.F.R. part 225—appendix C) to raise the 

13 consolidated asset threshold under such policy statement 

14 from $1,000,000,000 (as adjusted by Public Law 113– 

15 250) to $5,000,000,000. 

16 (b) CONFORMING AMENDMENT.—Subparagraph (C) 

17 of section 171(b)(5) of the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Re18 form and Consumer Protection Act (12 U.S.C. 

19 5371(b)(5)) is amended to read as follows: 

20 ‘‘(C) any bank holding company or savings 

21 and loan holding company that is subject to the 

22 application of the Small Bank Holding Com23 pany Policy Statement on Assessment of Finan24 cial and Managerial Factors of the Board of 

25 Governors (12 C.F.R. part 225—appendix C).’’. 


sradovich on DSK3TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
Union Calendar No. 360 

114TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 3791 

[Report No. 114–474] 

A BILL 

To raise the consolidated assets threshold under the 

and for other purposes. small bank holding company policy statement, 

MARCH 23, 2016 

Committed to the Committee of the Whole House on the 

State of the Union and ordered to be printed 


sradovich on DSK3TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY HIGH

 746

 756

 1,385

 994

 810

 694

 551

 542

 469

 802

 3,193

 4,911

 5,814

 7,124

 6,791

 7,656

 8,115

 8,348

 6,655

 5,420

 4,695

 4,998

 4,922

 5,799

 7,667

 9,386

 11,077

 11,548

 12,912

 13,819

 13,018

 445

 431

 433

 429

 409

 405

 401

 387

 373

 351

 352

 376

 450

 491

 520

 567

 782

 878

 960

 943

 932

 749

 916

 1,054

 1,190

 1,401

 1,727

 1,949

 2,529

 2,727

 2,716

 513

 490

 562

 520

 490

 461

 455

 420

 400

 417

 689

 1,046

 1,567

 2,035

 2,373

 2,919

 3,351

 3,254

 2,719

 2,461

 2,189

 2,317

 2,564

 2,849

 3,334

 3,854

 4,864

 5,461

 6,453

 6,996

 6,711

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

JANUARY 2022 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: February 1, 2022

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

PITTSBURG BOTTOM ON THE SACRAMENTO RIVER
### §§186, 187. Transferred

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section 186, Pub. L. 91–296, title V, §501, June 30, 1970, 84 Stat. 352, which related to congressional findings as to marihuana use, the need for a better understanding of the health consequences, and the lack of information thereto, was transferred and set out as a note under section 242 of Title 42, The Public Health and Welfare.

Section 187, Pub. L. 91–296, title V, §502, June 30, 1970, 84 Stat. 352, which directed the Secretary of Health, Education and Welfare to report to Congress on the current information on the health consequence of marihuana use, with recommendations for legislative and administrative action and to submit a preliminary report no later than 90 days after June 30, 1970, was transferred and set out as a note under section 242 of Title 42.
<PAGE>

                                                                     EXHIBIT 2

                                 PLAN OF MERGER
                                       OF
               PACCAR LEASING CORPORATION, A DELAWARE CORPORATION,
                                       AND
                PACCAR FINANCIAL CORP., A WASHINGTON CORPORATION

     This Plan of Merger shall be effective as of May 1, 2000, by the Boards
of Directors of PACCAR Leasing Corporation, a Delaware corporation ("PLC"), and
PACCAR Financial Corp., a Washington corporation ("PFC"), for the purpose of
merging PLC with and into PFC.

     1.  MERGER. PLC and PFC are both wholly-owned subsidiaries of PACCAR Inc,
a Delaware corporation. PLC will be merged with and into PFC, and PFC will be
the surviving corporation.

     2.  MANNER AND BASIS OF CONVERTING SHARES AND TERMS AND CONDITIONS OF
MERGER. As of the effective date of the merger, which is the date of which the
Articles of Merger are filed with the Washington Secretary of State, (a) all of
the outstanding shares of common stock of PLC shall be canceled; (b) the
separate corporate existence of PLC shall cease; (c) all right, title, and
interest of PLC in any real or personal property, both tangible and intangible,
shall be vested with PFC without reversion or impairment; and (d) PFC shall have
all liabilities of PLC.

     3.  TAX FREE MERGER. For federal income tax purposes, the merger shall be
accounted for as a tax free merger pursuant to Sections 368(a)(1)(A) of the
Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended, and the applicable regulations
issued under such Code.

    Dated ___________________, 2000.


                                       PACCAR Leasing Corporation,
                                       a Delaware corporation


                                       By: /s/ Mark C Pigott
                                          -------------------------------
                                           M. C. Pigott, Chairman


                                       PACCAR Financial Corp.,
                                       a Washington corporation


                                       By: /s/ Mark C Pigott
                                          -------------------------------
                                           M. C. Pigott, Chairman
§ 1002.312 What remedies may be awarded for a violation of USERRA? In any action or proceeding the court may award relief as follows: ( a ) The court may require the employer to comply with the provisions of the Act;
( b ) The court may require the employer to compensate the individual for any loss of wages or benefits suffered by reason of the employer's failure to comply with the Act;
( c ) The court may require the employer to pay the individual an amount equal to the amount of lost wages and benefits as liquidated damages, if the court determines that the employer's failure to comply with the Act was willful. A violation shall be considered to be willful if the employer either knew or showed reckless disregard for whether its conduct was prohibited by the Act.
( d ) Any wages, benefits, or liquidated damages awarded under paragraphs (b) and (c) of this section are in addition to, and must not diminish, any of the other rights and benefits provided by USERRA (such as, for example, the right to be employed or reemployed by the employer).
§ 1001.130 Determination of compliance. ( a ) The ASVET shall have authority for applying the requirements and remedial actions necessary to implement 20 CFR part 658, subpart H. In the event of such application, references in 20 CFR part 658, subpart H, to “ETA” shall read instead “OASVET”; references to “Regional Administrator” shall read instead “RDVETS”; and references to “JS regulations” shall include this part.
( b ) The ASVET shall establish appropriate program and management measurement and appraisal mechanisms to ensure that the standards of performance set forth in §§ 1001.120-1001.125 of this part are met. Specific performance standards designed to measure State agency services provided to veterans and eligible persons required by § 1001.120(a) of this part will be developed administratively through negotiations between State agency administrators and SDVETS and numerical values of the standards will be published as public notices in the Federal Register. A full report of those State agencies in noncompliance with the standards of performance and their corrective action plans shall be incorporated into the Secretary's annual report to the Congress cited at § 1001.131 of this part.
( c ) Every effort should be made by the State agency administrator and the SDVETS to resolve all issues informally before proceeding with the formal process.
( d ) If it is determined by the ASVET that certain State agencies are not complying with the performance standards at §§ 1001.120-1001.125 of this part, such State agencies shall be required to provide documentary evidence to the ASVET that their failure is based on good cause. If good cause is not shown, the ASVET, pursuant to subpart H of 20 CFR part 658, shall formally designate the State agency as out of compliance, shall require it to submit a corrective action plan for the following program year, and may take other action against the State agency pursuant to subpart H of 20 CFR part 658.
[49 FR 12919, Mar. 30, 1984. Redesignated and amended at 54 FR 39353, Sept. 26, 1989]
#### § 10.739 What kind of objective evidence of a potential Federal crime must exist for coverage to be extended?

Based on the facts available at the time of the event, the officer must have an awareness of sufficient information which would lead a reasonable officer, under the circumstances, to conclude that a Federal crime was in progress, or was about to occur. This awareness need not extend to the precise particulars of the crime (the section of Title 18, United States Code, for example), but there must be sufficient evidence that the officer was in fact engaged in actual or attempted apprehension of a Federal criminal or prevention of a Federal crime.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
       
<S>                                        <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JAN-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             FEB-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               JAN-31-1998
<CASH>                                         380,136
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   30,377
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                     70,000
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               480,513
<PP&E>                                          36,581
<DEPRECIATION>                                  33,595
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 725,876
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          633,042
<BONDS>                                      2,202,321
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         8,638
<OTHER-SE>                                 (2,485,487)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   725,876
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                3,204,438
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             1,031,250
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             459,104
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (4,798,588)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                              1,031,250
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (4,798,588)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.78)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.78)
        



</TABLE>
§ 228.13 Computation of the tier I annuity component of a parent's insurance annuity. The tier I annuity component of a parent's insurance annuity is dependent on whether one or two parents are entitled. ( a ) *One parent entitled.* A parent's tier I annuity component is equal to 821 ⁄ 2 percent of the PIA computed under § 228.10 of this part.
( b ) *More than one parent entitled.* A parent's tier I annuity component is equal to 75 percent of the PIA computed under § 228.10 of this part.
( c ) The amounts computed under paragraph (a) or (b) of this section may be adjusted for the family maximum. See § 228.14 of this part.
EXHIBIT 32



CERTIFICATION OF PERIODIC FINANCIAL
REPORT BY THE CHIEF EXECUTIVE



OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER



PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY
ACT OF 2002



Solely for
the purposes of complying with 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, we, the undersigned Acting Chief Executive Officer and the Chief Financial Officer of Save the World Air, Inc. (the “Company”),
hereby certify, based on our knowledge, that the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the quarter ended June 30, 2012
(the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that
the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
of the Company.



|                      |                         |  |  | 
|--------------------- | ----------------------- |  |  | 
|Date: August 14, 2012 | CECIL BOND KYTE         | 
|                      | Cecil Bond Kyte         | 
|                      | Chief Executive Officer | 
|                     
|                      |                         | 
|Date: August 14, 2012 | GREGG BIGGER            | 
|                      | Gregg Bigger            | 
|                      | Chief Financial Officer |