alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### HARTFORD INSURANCE COMPANY OF the MIDWEST; Interstate Indemnity Insurance Company, Plaintiffs-Counter-Defendants-Appellees, v. Charles D. CLINE; Judith E. Davis, Defendants-Counter-Claimants-Appellants.

No. 05-2075.

United States Court of Appeals, Tenth Circuit.

Aug. 2, 2006.

Larry D. Beall, Kelley J. Friedman, Beall & Blehler P.A., Matthew A. Pullen, April D. White, Yenson Lynn Allen & Wosick, Albuquerque, NM, for Plaintiffs-Counter-Defendants-Appellees.

Michael B. Browde, Albuquerque, NM, C. Barry Crutchfield, Templeman and Crutchfield, Lovington, NM, Mark Stout, Stout *&*Stout, Hobbs, NM, for Defendants-Counter-Claimants-Appellants.

Before SEYMOUR, HARTZ, and McCONNELL, Circuit Judges.

ORDER AND JUDGMENT*

HARTZ, Circuit Judge.

On October 12, 2005, this court certified the following question of law to the New Mexico Supreme Court:

> Is excluding domestic partners from the definition of *family member*in an automobile-insurance policy invalid as contrary to the public policy of the state of New Mexico?

*See Hartford Ins. Co. v. Cline,*427 F.3d 715, 716 (10th Cir.2005).

On June 20, 2006, the New Mexico Supreme Court filed an opinion answering the question in the negative. *See Hartford*140 N.M. 16, 139 P.3d 176 (2006). That decision rejects the only argument raised by the defendants in this appeal. Ms. Davis is not a *family member*of Mr. Cline and therefore is not entitled to Uninsured Motorist/Underinsured Motorist Coverage under the insurance policies at issue. Exercising our jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291, we AFFIRM the judgment of the district court.

*

 This order and judgment is not binding precedent, except under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, and collateral estoppel. The court generally disfavors the citation of orders and judgments; nevertheless, an order and judgment may be cited under the terms and conditions of 10th Cir. R. 36.3.
§ 1002.168 If the employee's coverage was terminated at the beginning of or during service, does his or her coverage have to be reinstated upon reemployment? ( a ) If health plan coverage for the employee or a dependent was terminated by reason of service in the uniformed services, that coverage must be reinstated upon reemployment. An exclusion or waiting period may not be imposed in connection with the reinstatement of coverage upon reemployment, if an exclusion or waiting period would not have been imposed had coverage not been terminated by reason of such service.
( b ) USERRA permits a health plan to impose an exclusion or waiting period as to illnesses or injuries determined by the Secretary of Veterans Affairs to have been incurred in, or aggravated during, performance of service in the uniformed services. The determination that the employee's illness or injury was incurred in, or aggravated during, the performance of service may only be made by the Secretary of Veterans Affairs or his or her representative. Other coverage, for injuries or illnesses that are not service-related (or for the employee's dependents, if he or she has dependent coverage), must be reinstated subject to paragraph (a) of this section.
#### § 209.17 Use of payroll records as returns of compensation.

Payroll records of employers which have permanently ceased operations may be accepted in lieu of prescribed reports *provided that* there is no official of the employer available to prepare and certify to the accuracy of such reports and, *provided further that* any employer and employee tax liability incurred under the Railroad Retirement Tax Act has been discharged.

[61 FR 31395, June 20, 1996]
# C_2012088EN.01000101.xml

| 24.3.2012 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 88/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

24.3.2012

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 88/1

---

Authorisation for State aid pursuant to Articles 107 and 108 of the TFEU

Cases where the Commission raises no objections

(Text with EEA relevance)

2012/C 88/01

| Date of adoption of the decision | 16.12.2011 |
| --- | --- |
| Reference number of State Aid | SA.32603 (11/N) |
| Member State | Italy |
| Region | — |
| Title (and/or name of the beneficiary) | Misure a sostegno del trasporto combinato e/o trasbordato su ferrovia — c.d. «Ferrobonus» |
| Legal basis | Decreto del Ministro delle Infrastrutture e dei Trasporti n. 592 del 4 agosto 2010;
  Decreto del Ministro delle Infrastrutture e dei Trasporti n. 750 del 4 ottobre 2010;
  Decreto dirigenziale n. 3284 del 15 novembre 2010 |
| Type of measure | Aid scheme |
| Objective | Sectoral development, Environmental protection |
| Form of aid | Direct grant |
| Budget | | Annual budget: EUR 25,7 million |

Date of adoption of the decision

16.12.2011

Reference number of State Aid

SA.32603 (11/N)

Member State

Italy

Region

—

Title (and/or name of the beneficiary)

Misure a sostegno del trasporto combinato e/o trasbordato su ferrovia — c.d. «Ferrobonus»

Legal basis

Decreto del Ministro delle Infrastrutture e dei Trasporti n. 592 del 4 agosto 2010;

Decreto del Ministro delle Infrastrutture e dei Trasporti n. 750 del 4 ottobre 2010;

Decreto dirigenziale n. 3284 del 15 novembre 2010

Type of measure

Aid scheme

Objective

Sectoral development, Environmental protection

Form of aid

Direct grant

Budget

Annual budget: EUR 25,7 million

| | Overall budget: EUR 25,7 million |
| --- | --- |

Overall budget: EUR 25,7 million

Intensity

37 %

Duration (period)

2011-2012

Economic sectors

Railways

Name and address of the granting authority

| Ministero delle infrastrutture e dei trasporti |
| --- |
| Via Nomentana 2 |
| Viale dell'Arte 16 |
| Via Caraci 36 |
| 00161 Roma RM |
| ITALIA |

Ministero delle infrastrutture e dei trasporti

Via Nomentana 2

Viale dell'Arte 16

Via Caraci 36

00161 Roma RM

ITALIA

Other information

—

The authentic text(s) of the decision, from which all confidential information has been removed, can be found at:

http://ec.europa.eu/community_law/state_aids/state_aids_texts_en.htm

---
EXHIBIT 11b


                              AMERITECH CORPORATION
                 COMPUTATION OF FULLY DILUTED EARNINGS PER SHARE
                                   (Unaudited)
                                        
                                        
                                           Three Months Ended
                                              September 30
                                             -------------
                                          1997              1996
                                          ----              ----
Net income                           $613,298,000      $518,575,000
                                     ============      ============


Weighted average number of
shares outstanding                    549,035,348       549,830,266

Additional dilutive effect of
outstanding options (as determined
by the application of the treasury
stock method)                           2,228,963         2,760,246
                                     ------------      ------------

Weighted average shares outstanding
on which fully diluted earnings
per share are based                   551,264,311       552,590,512
                                     ============      ============
Fully diluted earnings per share            $1.11             $0.94
                                     ============      ============


We submit this calculation in accordance with Regulation S-K,Item 601(b)11.
It is not required by footnote 2 to paragraph 14 of Accounting Principles
Board Opinion No. 15 because it results in dilution of less than three
percent.


We have restated amounts for the prior year to include the windfall tax
benefit in our determination of the dilutive effect of outstanding options.
#### § 6.44 Free warehousing.

The furnishing of free warehousing by delaying delivery of distilled spirits, wine, or malt beverages beyond the time that payment for the product is received, or if a retailer is purchasing on credit, delaying final delivery of products beyond the close of the period of time for which credit is lawfully extended, is the furnishing of a service or thing of value within the meaning of the Act.
§ 222.41 Determination of relationship and support for parent. ( a ) *Annuity claimant.* For purposes of applying for an annuity, a claimant is considered the employee's parent when the claimant— ( 1 ) Is the natural mother or father of the employee, and is considered the employee's parent under the law of the State in which the employee had a permanent home when the employee died; or
( 2 ) Is a person who legally adopted the employee before the employee became 16 years old; or
( 3 ) Is a stepparent who married the employee's natural or adoptive parent before the employee became 16 years old (the marriage must be valid under the law of the State in which the employee had a permanent home when the employee died); and
( 4 ) Was receiving at least one-half support from the employee (see §§ 222.42 and 222.43 of this part) either when the employee died or at the beginning of the period of disability, if the employee had a period of disability.
( b ) *Lump-sum payment claimant.* For purposes of applying for lump-sum payments, a claimant is considered the employee's parent when he or she— ( 1 ) Is the natural mother or father of the employee, and is considered the employee's parent under applicable State law; or
( 2 ) Legally adopted the employee, if thereby recognized as a parent under applicable State law; but
( 3 ) The claimant need not have received one-half support from the employee.
EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

Pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of section 1350, chapter 63 of title 18, United States Code), each of the undersigned officers of American Tire Distributors Holdings, Inc., a
Delaware corporation (the Company), hereby certifies that, to his best knowledge:



| | (a) | the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2005 (the Report) of the Company fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (b) | information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                      |  |        |  |                                                  
|--------------------- |  | ------ |  | -------------------------------------------------
|Dated: March 31, 2006 |  | By:    |  | /s/ RICHARD P. JOHNSON                           
|                      |  | Name:  |  | Richard P. Johnson                               
|                      |  | Title: |  | Chairman and Chief Executive Officer             
|                      |  |       
|                      |  | By:    |  | /s/ DAVID L. DYCKMAN                             
|                      |  | Name:  |  | David L. Dyckman                                 
|                      |  | Title: |  | Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

DAY

 13,991

 13,779

 13,943

 14,669

 16,134

 16,950

 17,614

 18,384

 18,910

 19,326

 19,916

 20,590

 22,838

 23,990

 24,476

 24,705

 24,955

 25,022

 24,918

 25,009

 25,162

 25,387

 26,172

 26,558

 27,177

 28,290

 29,946

 31,501

 32,485

 33,670

 40,947

 41,758

 42,749

 43,797

 44,289

 45,258

 46,245

 47,232

 48,128

 48,985

 49,825

 50,721

 52,399

 53,654

 54,661

 55,522

 56,528

 57,458

 58,267

 58,963

 59,818

 60,678

 60,983

 61,812

 62,572

 63,378

 64,268

 65,138

 65,882

 66,630

STORAGE - A.F. 

 54,938

 55,537

 56,692

 58,466

 60,423

 62,208

 63,859

 65,616

 67,038

 68,311

 69,741

 71,311

 75,237

 77,644

 79,137

 80,227

 81,483

 82,480

 83,185

 83,972

 84,980

 86,065

 87,155

 88,370

 89,749

 91,668

 94,214

 96,639

 98,367

 100,300

1,906

1,748

2,377

2,263

2,460

2,522

2,348

2,301

2,041

2,203

2,019

2,083

3,203

2,660

2,252

1,663

3,404

2,256

1,901

1,917

1,894

1,872

1,637

2,179

2,145

1,735

2,226

2,210

1,990

1,888

2,098

2,050

2,959

3,157

3,447

3,422

3,180

3,187

2,758

2,845

2,740

2,875

5,182

3,874

3,005

2,213

4,037

2,759

2,256

2,314

2,402

2,419

2,187

2,792

2,840

2,702

3,510

3,433

2,861

2,863

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

APRIL 2000 FULL NATURAL FLOW AT NEW MELONES DAM RUN DATE: 05/02/2000

TOTALS +45,742 88,367

* October 1, 175,276

 447.8

 451.9

 457.7

 464.0

 470.8

 477.6

 483.9

 490.3

 495.7

 501.4

 506.8

 512.5

 522.8

 530.5

 536.4

 540.8

 548.8

 554.3

 558.8

 563.4

 568.1

 572.9

 577.3

 582.8

 588.4

 593.8

 600.8

 607.6

 613.2

 618.9

DONNELLS

RES

BEARDSLEY

RES

1999 TO DATE

NEW

MELONES

INFLOW

C.F.S

NATURAL

RIVER

C.F.S

ACCUM *

FULL

NATURAL

1000 A.F.

RESERVOIR

TOTAL

+380

+599

+1,155

+1,774

+1,957

+1,785

+1,651

+1,757

+1,422

+1,273

+1,430

+1,570

+3,926

+2,407

+1,493

+1,090

+1,256

+997

+705

+787

+1,008

+1,085

+1,090

+1,215

+1,379

+1,919

+2,546

+2,425

+1,728

+1,933

CHANGE

A.F. C.F.S.

+192

+302

+582

+894

+987

+900

+832

+886

+717

+642

+721

+792

+1,979

+1,214

+753

+550

+633

+503

+355

+397

+508

+547

+550

+613

+695

+967

+1,284

+1,223

+871

+975
**Exhibit23**

 

 

 

 

CONSENT OF INDEPENDENTPUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS

 

 

As independent publicaccountants, we hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in theRegistration Statements on Form S-3 (Nos. 333-96207 and 333-41130) and theRegistration Statements on Form S-8 (Nos. 33-64805, 333-38458, 333-46310 and333-46312) of our report dated January 22, 2001 included in this Form 10-K forthe fiscal year ended December 31, 2001. It should be noted that we have not audited any financial statements ofthe company subsequent to December 31, 2001, or performed any audit proceduressubsequent to the date of our report.

 

 
|   |
|--------|
|   | ARTHUR ANDERSEN LLP |

 

Dallas, Texas

    March 27, 2002

 

 

----
### §76s. Definitions

As used in this subchapter, the terms "building and site of the John F. Kennedy Center for the Performing Arts" and "grounds of the John F. Kennedy Center for the Performing Arts" refer to the site in the District of Columbia on which the John F. Kennedy Center building is constructed and that extends to the line of the west face of the west retaining walls and curbs of the Inner Loop Freeway on the east, the north face of the north retaining walls and curbs of the Theodore Roosevelt Bridge approaches on the south, the east face of the east retaining walls and curbs of Rock Creek Parkway on the west, and the south curbs of New Hampshire Avenue and F Street on the north, as generally depicted on the map entitled "Transfer of John F. Kennedy Center for the Performing Arts", numbered 844/82563, and dated April 20, 1994 (as amended by the map entitled "Transfer of John F. Kennedy Center for the Performing Arts", numbered 844/82563A and dated May 22, 1997), which shall be on file and available for public inspection in the office of the National Capital Region, National Park Service, Department of the Interior. Upon completion of the project for establishment of the John F. Kennedy Center Plaza authorized by section 76q–1 of this title, the Board, in consultation with the Secretary of Transportation, shall amend the map that is on file and available for public inspection under the preceding sentence.

(Pub. L. 85–874, §14, formerly §13, as added Pub. L. 103–279, §8, July 21, 1994, 108 Stat. 1416; amended Pub. L. 105–95, §4, Nov. 19, 1997, 111 Stat. 2149; renumbered §14 and amended Pub. L. 107–224, §§2(1), 4(b), Sept. 18, 2002, 116 Stat. 1340, 1343.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

2002—Pub. L. 107–224, §4(b), inserted at end: "Upon completion of the project for establishment of the John F. Kennedy Center Plaza authorized by section 76q–1 of this title, the Board, in consultation with the Secretary of Transportation, shall amend the map that is on file and available for public inspection under the preceding sentence."

1997—Pub. L. 105–95 inserted "(as amended by the map entitled 'Transfer of John F. Kennedy Center for the Performing Arts', numbered 844/82563A and dated May 22, 1997)" after "April 20, 1994".
EXHIBIT 32.2

Certification by the Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to  18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, I, the undersigned Chief Financial Officer of Genzyme Corporation (the "Company"), hereby certify that the Quarterly
Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the quarter ended September 30, 2007 (the "Report") fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

|/s/MICHAEL S. WYZGAMichael S. Wyzga Chief Financial
OfficerNovember 8, 2007 |  | 
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------- |  | 

---



QuickLinks
A-AA+Skip to content

                  - Home
                  - Compendium Statistics
                  - Event
                  - Archives
                  - Glossary
                  - Help
                  - Contact
                  - Research on Disability

Annual Disability Statistics Compendium

              - Home /
              - Compendium Statistics /
              - Poverty /
              - 4.1 Poverty-Civilians with Disabilities Ages 18-64 Years Living in the Community for the U.S.

## Table 4.1: Poverty—Civilians with Disabilities Ages 18 to 64 Years Living in the Community for the United States and States: 2012

----

----

 

----

#### 2012 Disability Compendium

                        - Home
                        - Compendium Statistics                           - Population and Prevelance
                          - Employment
                          - Time Trend Population Statistics
                          - Poverty
                          - Earnings
                          - Veterans
                          - Health Insurance Coverage
                          - Health
                          - Social Security Administration Programs
                          - Medicaid and Medicare
                          - Special Education
                          - Vocational Rehabilitation
                          - Federal Government Spending and Employment
                          - International Disability Statistics
                          - Population Statistics: Disability Type
                        - Event
                        - Archives                           - 2012 Compendium Statistics
                        - Glossary
                        - Help
                        - Contact
                        - Research on Disability

#### Funding for this project is made possible by:

 The Research and Training Center on Disability Statistics and Demographics (StatsRRTC), which is funded by the U.S. Department of Education, National Institute for Disability and Rehabilitation Research, under cooperative agreements H133B080012.

#### Stay Connected

**Institute on Disability**10 West Edge Drive, Suite 101Durham, NH 03824603.862.4320 | relay: 711 | [email protected]www.iod.unh.edu

© 2013. Institute on Disability.University of New Hampshire.
#### § 10.600 How can final decisions of OWCP be reviewed?

There are three methods for reviewing a formal decision of the OWCP (§§ 10.125 through 10.127 discuss how decisions are made). These methods are: reconsideration by the district office; a hearing before an OWCP hearing representative; and appeal to the Employees' Compensation Appeals Board (ECAB). For each method there are time limitations and other restrictions which may apply, and not all options are available for all decisions, so the employee should consult the requirements set forth below. Further rules governing appeals to the ECAB are found at part 501 of this title.
(No. 74-CC-47

#### Dean Business Equipment Company, Inc., Claimant, *vs.*State of Illinois, Department of General Services, Respondent.

*Opinion filed February 28, 1974.*

Dean Business Equipment Co., Inc., Claimant, pro se.

William J. Scott, Attorney General; William E. Webber, Assistant Attorney General, for Respondent.

Per Curiam.
<PAGE>

                                                                    Exhibit 32.2


                  CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER


Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. Sec 1350),
the undersigned, James L. DiStefano, Chief Financial Officer of Healthcare
Services Group, Inc., a Pennsylvania corporation (the "Company"), does hereby
certify, to his knowledge, that:

The Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2005 of the
Company (the "Report") fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and the information contained in
the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition
and results of operations of the Company.

                                                /s/ James L. DiStefano
                                               -------------------------
                                                James L. DiStefano
                                                Chief Financial Officer
                                                July 22, 2005

                                      -33-
I 

116TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 5593 

To amend title 40, United States Code, to modify the definition of 

Appalachian region. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JANUARY 13, 2020 

Mr. NORMAN introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure 

A BILL 

To amend title 40, United States Code, to modify the 

definition of Appalachian region. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. DEFINITION OF APPALACHIAN REGION. 

4 Section 14102(a)(1)(J) of title 40, United States 

5 Code, is amended by striking ‘‘and Spartanburg’’ and in6 serting ‘‘Spartanburg, and Union’’. 

Æ 


pamtmann on DSKBC07HB2PROD with BILLS
#### In the Matter of New York Automatic Canteen Corp., Respondent, against Lazarus Joseph, as Comptroller of the City of New York, Appellant.

*Per Curiam.*

The record should show fully the practice, past and present, in the comptroller’s office with respect to (a) notice given to the taxpayer and his designated attorney at law with respect to any hearings and other proceedings in connection with an application for the refund of sales tax including the final decision thereon and (b) the forms, if any, prepared by the comptroller for the use of taxpayers, designating attorneys in fact or attorneys at law to represent them in connection with applications for refund of sales tax. The order is, accordingly, reversed without prejudice and without costs and the proceeding remitted to Special Term to ascertain the foregoing and to make its decision on the motion to dismiss.

Peek, P. J., Giennon, Dore, Yan Yoorhis and Shientag, JJ., concur.

Order unanimously reversed, without prejudice and without costs and the proceeding remitted to Special Term for further action in accordance with opinion. Settle order on notice.