alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 99.4
 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
  1.
    
    The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934; and
 2.
    
    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
 /s/ Umang VohraUmang VohraChief Financial Officer
§ 10.104 How and when is a claim for recurrence filed? ( a ) A recurrence should be reported on Form CA-2a if that recurrence causes the employee to lose time from work and incur a wage loss, or if the employee experiences a renewed need for treatment after previously being released from care. However, a notice of recurrence should not be filed when a new injury, new occupational disease, or new event contributing to an already-existing occupational disease has occurred. In these instances, the employee should file Form CA-1 or CA-2.
( b ) The employee has the burden of establishing by the weight of reliable, probative and substantial evidence that the recurrence of disability is causally related to the original injury. ( 1 ) The employee must include a detailed factual statement as described on Form CA-2a. The employer may submit comments concerning the employee's statement.
( 2 ) The employee should arrange for the submittal of a detailed medical report from the attending physician as described on Form CA-2a. The employee should also submit, or arrange for the submittal of, similar medical reports for any examination and/or treatment received after returning to work following the original injury.
( c ) A claim for recurrence of disability is not available where OWCP has issued a loss of wage-earning capacity determination. Under that circumstance, the only method for claiming additional wage loss compensation is through a request to modify that determination. However, OWCP is not precluded from adjudicating a limited period of disability following the issuance of a loss of wage-earning capacity decision, such as where an employee has a demonstrated need for surgery.
#### H. P. Sickels Company, Respondent, v. The R. T. Ford Company, Appellant.

Judgment affirmed, with costs. All concurred.
EXHIBIT 10.10 

August 23, 2007 

To:     The
Holders listed on Schedule I hereto 

Re:     Current Conversion Price of the warrants
listed on Schedule I hereto (the “Warrants”) 

Dear Warrant Holder: 

     Pursuant
to the terms of the Warrants, Emisphere Technologies, Inc. (the “Company”) is
required to provide you with notice upon any antidilution adjustments to the
exercise price of the Warrants. As described below, the Company has consummated
a financing that results in a new exercise price for shares subject to the
Warrants of $3.76. 

     According
to the terms and conditions of the Warrants, the exercise price for each share
of Common Stock is $4.00. Thereafter, certain antidilution adjustments to the
exercise price are required to be made upon the occurrence of certain
events.

     On August
22, 2007, the Company completed the sale (the “Offering”) of 2,000,000 shares of
Common Stock and warrants to purchase 400,000 shares of Common Stock. The shares
of Common Stock and warrants were sold together as units for a negotiated sales
price of $3.785. The Common Stock sold in the Offering had a deemed per share
price of $3.76 per share, the last reported sale price for our common stock on
the Nasdaq Global Market on August 16, 2007. Therefore, pursuant to the terms of
the Warrants, the Offering resulted in the automatic adjustment of the Exercise
Price to $3.76, which is the lowest per share price received in the
Offering.

     The value
of the warrant coverage for the warrants sold in the Offering was $0.025. Based
on the 20% level of warrant coverage, the consideration received for a warrant
to purchase one full share of Common Stock is $0.125 ($0.025 multiplied by 5).
The warrants are also subject to an exercise price of $3.948 per share of common
stock, resulting in a total price for each share of Common Stock subject to the
warrants of $0.125 plus $3.948, or $4.073. Therefore, the sale of the warrants
in the Offering does not trigger any further antidilution adjustment to the
exercise price of the Warrants.

     If you have any questions regarding
this notice, please contact William T. Rumble by telephone at (914) 785-4717.


Very truly yours, 

 


	By: 	/s/ Michael V. Novinski
	Michael V. Novinski
	President and Chief Executive
Officer







SCHEDULE I 

	Holder 
    	Warrant 
    	Issue
      Date  	Expiration  	Equivalent
      Shares         
	   	No.  	  	Date 
	Outstanding  
	MHR Capital Partners (100)
      LP  	A-5  	9/23/2005  	3/31/2010  	47,152 
    
	 	 	 	 	 
	MHR Capital Partners
      Master  	A-6  	9/23/2005  	3/31/2010  	340,222 
    
	Account LP (formerly MHR
      Capital  	   	   	   	   
	Partners (500)
      LP)  	   	   	   	   
	MHR Institutional Partners IIA
      LP  	A-12  	9/21/2006  	9/26/2011  	37,030 
    
	 	 	 	 	 
	MHR Institutional Partners II
      LP  	A-13  	9/21/2006  	9/26/2011  	14,698 
    
	 	  	 	 	 
	MHR Capital Partners (100)
      LP  	A-14  	9/21/2006  	9/26/2011  	68,809 
    
	 	 	 	 	 
	MHR Capital Partners
      Master  	A-15  	9/21/2006  	9/26/2011  	496,674 
    
	Account
      LP
EXHIBIT 3.35
 Delaware
 
 The First State
  
 /s/ Harriett Smith WindsorHarriet Smith Windsor, Secretary of State 4593826 8100
    
    AUTHENTICATION: 6822750080912726
    
    Date: 08-29-08




---



##### 



CERTIFICATE OF FORMATION
 OF
 JACKSONVILLE SURGICAL AND MEDICAL AFFILIATES, LLC
      th
 /s/ David C. HeadDavid C. Head, Authorized Person STATE OF DELAWARESECRETARY OF STATEDIVISION OF CORPORATIONSDELIVERED 08:36 PM 08/28/2008FILED 08:29 PM 08/28/2008SRV 080912726  4593826 FILE
§ 341.5 Amount of reimbursement. ( a ) The Board shall receive as reimbursement the lesser of: ( 1 ) The amount of sickness benefits paid to the employee for the infirmity for which he or she recovers any sum or damages; or
( 2 ) The net amount of the sum or damages paid to the employee for the infirmity, after substracting the amount of the expenses listed in paragraph (b) of this section.
( b ) The expenses that may be subtracted from the amount of damages recovered are: ( 1 ) The medical and hospital expenses that the employee incurred because of his or her injury. These expenses are deductible even if they are paid under an insurance policy covering the employee or are covered by his or her membership in a medical or hospital plan or association. But such expenses are not deductible if they are not covered by insurance or by membership in a medical or hospital plan or association and are consequently paid by a railroad or other person directly to the doctor, clinic or hospital that provided the medical care or services.
( 2 ) The cost of litigation. This includes both the amount of the fee to which the attorney and the employee have agreed and the other expenses that the employee incurred in the conduct of the litigation itself.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY HIGH

 7,717

 9,854

 8,575

 7,201

 7,560

 7,593

 10,754

 9,603

 11,368

 10,714

 7,788

 6,452

 10,173

 10,961

 10,832

 12,670

 15,605

 16,192

 16,635

 14,294

 18,227

 15,739

 15,478

 14,961

 16,470

 12,812

 12,030

 13,671

 16,909

 17,792

 19,985

 393

 610

 655

 503

 482

 395

 681

 769

 744

 812

 721

 659

 1,044

 983

 1,580

 1,691

 2,171

 1,982

 2,257

 2,519

 3,308

 3,199

 3,120

 3,035

 3,262

 3,204

 2,787

 3,590

 4,874

 6,150

 6,412

 3,300

 3,763

 3,617

 3,053

 2,763

 3,103

 3,833

 4,010

 4,312

 4,211

 3,875

 3,578

 4,069

 3,780

 4,808

 5,429

 7,202

 7,557

 7,626

 8,193

 9,760

 9,411

 9,343

 9,657

 9,999

 8,885

 8,146

 8,116

 8,842

 9,758

 10,891

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

MAY 2012 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: June 22, 2012

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

PORT CHICAGO TOP IN SUISUN BAY
This memorandum is uncorrected and subject to revision before

publication in the New York Reports.

----------------------------------------------------------------- No. 42 PAF-PAR LLC, Appellant, v. Michael Silberberg, et al., Respondents.

William L. Charron, for appellant. Vincent J. Syracuse, for respondents.

* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * Order affirmed, with costs. In this action pursuant to CPLR 3213, PAF-PAR LLC failed to demonstrate standing to maintain the action. Chief Judge DiFiore and Judges Pigott, Rivera, Abdus-Salaam, Stein, Fahey and Garcia concur.
Decided March 24, 2016
Exhibit
99.4
 (GRAPHIC)
    
    METAL STORM LIMITED
ACN 064 270 006
ASX: MST
OTC: MTSXY
 Canadian Small Arms Replacement Program
 Brisbane, Australia
      Secondary effects module (shotgun, programmable ammunition of different calibers), for all options
based on Metal Storm technology
  http://www.dtic.mil/ndia/2011smallarms/wednesdayweapons12482harris.pdf
    Page 1 of 2




---



##### 



Notes:
 
 Company Contact:
 Australia & USA
 
 About Metal Storm
    Safe Harbour
  Page 2 of 2
§ 404.1562 Medical-vocational profiles showing an inability to make an adjustment to other work. ( a ) *If you have done only arduous unskilled physical labor.* If you have no more than a marginal education (*see* § 404.1564) and work experience of 35 years or more during which you did only arduous unskilled physical labor, and you are not working and are no longer able to do this kind of work because of a severe impairment(s) (*see* §§ 404.1520(c), 404.1521, and 404.1523), we will consider you unable to do lighter work, and therefore, disabled. Example to paragraph (a): B is a 58-year-old miner's helper with a fourth grade education who has a lifelong history of unskilled arduous physical labor. B says that he is disabled because of arthritis of the spine, hips, and knees, and other impairments. Medical evidence shows a “severe” combination of impairments that prevents B from performing his past relevant work. Under these circumstances, we will find that B is disabled.
( b ) *If you are at least 55 years old, have no more than a limited education, and have no past relevant work experience.* If you have a severe, medically determinable impairment(s) (*see* §§ 404.1520(c), 404.1521, and 404.1523), are of advanced age (age 55 or older, *see* § 404.1563), have a limited education or less (*see* § 404.1564), and have no past relevant work experience (*see* § 404.1565), we will find you disabled. If the evidence shows that you meet this profile, we will not need to assess your residual functional capacity or consider the rules in appendix 2 to this subpart.
[68 FR 51163, Aug. 26, 2003]
#### § 404.1591 If your medical recovery was expected and you returned to work.

If your impairment was expected to improve and you returned to full-time work with no significant medical limitations and acknowledge that medical improvement has occurred, we may find that your disability ended in the month you returned to work. Unless there is evidence showing that your disability has not ended, we will use the medical and other evidence already in your file and the fact that you returned to full-time work without significant limitations to determine that you are no longer disabled. (If your impairment is not expected to improve, we will not ordinarily review your claim until the end of the trial work period, as described in § 404.1592.)

# Example:

Evidence obtained during the processing of your claim showed that you had an impairment that was expected to improve about 18 months after your disability began. We, therefore, told you that your claim would be reviewed again at that time. However, before the time arrived for your scheduled medical re-examination, you told us that you had returned to work and your impairment had improved. We investigated immediately and found that, in the 16th month after your disability began, you returned to full-time work without any significant medical restrictions. Therefore, we would find that your disability ended in the first month you returned to full-time work.

[50 FR 50130, Dec. 6, 1985]
### §7122. Authorization of appropriations

#### (a) In general

There are authorized to be appropriated to carry out this subpart $1,650,000,000 for fiscal year 2017 and $1,600,000,000 for each of fiscal years 2018 through 2020.

#### (b) Forward funding

Section 1223 of this title shall apply to this subpart.

(Pub. L. 89–10, title IV, §4112, as added Pub. L. 114–95, title IV, §4101, Dec. 10, 2015, 129 Stat. 1982.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Prior Provisions

A prior section 4112 of Pub. L. 89–10 was classified to section 7112 of this title, prior to the general amendment of this subpart by Pub. L. 114–95.

Another prior section 4112 of Pub. L. 89–10 was classified to section 7112 of this title, prior to the general amendment of this subchapter by Pub. L. 107–110.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date

Section effective Dec. 10, 2015, except with respect to certain noncompetitive programs and competitive programs, see section 5 of Pub. L. 114–95, set out as an Effective Date of 2015 Amendment note under section 6301 of this title.
#### § 228.53 Spouse minimum guarantee.

The Railroad Retirement Act provides that a spouse should receive no less as a widow(er) than he or she received as a spouse. However, if the widow(er) becomes entitled to a social security benefit, thus reducing his or her annuity, the spouse minimum guarantee is payable only to the extent that it guarantees the amount that the widow(er) would have received as a spouse had he or she been entitled to a social security benefit in the month preceding the employee's death in an amount equal to the amount of the social security benefit payable at the time the widow(er) first became entitled to the social security benefit.
Editorial Note on Part 44
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 44 appear by T.D. ATF-464, 66 FR 43480, Aug. 20, 2001, and T.D. ATF-480, 67 FR 30801-30803, May 8, 2002.

§ 44.32 Rate of special tax. ( a ) *General.* Title 26 U.S.C. 5731(a)(3) imposes a special tax of $1,000 per year on every export warehouse proprietor.
( b ) *Reduced rate for small proprietors.* Title 26 U.S.C. 5731(b) provides for a reduced rate of $500 per year with respect to any export warehouse proprietor whose gross receipts (for the most recent taxable year ending before the first day of the taxable period to which the special tax imposed by § 44.31 relates) are less than $500,000. The “taxable year” to be used for determining gross receipts is the taxpayer's income tax year. All gross receipts of the taxpayer shall be included, not just the gross receipts of the business subject to special tax. Proprietors of new businesses that have not yet begun a taxable year, as well as proprietors of existing businesses that have not yet ended a taxable year, who commence a new activity subject to special tax, qualify for the reduced special (occupational) tax rate, unless the business is a member of a “controlled group”; in that case, the rules of paragraph (c) of this section shall apply.
( c ) *Controlled group.* All persons treated as one taxpayer under 26 U.S.C. 5061(e)(3) shall be treated as one taxpayer for the purpose of determining gross receipts under paragraph (b) of this section. “Controlled group” means a controlled group of corporations, as defined in 26 U.S.C. 1563 and implementing regulations in 26 CFR 1.1563-1 through 1.1563-4, except that the words “at least 80 percent” shall be replaced by the words “more than 50 percent” in each place they appear in subsection (a) of 26 U.S.C. 1563, as well as in the implementing regulations. Also, the rules for a “controlled group of corporations” apply in a similar fashion to groups which include partnerships and/or sole proprietorships. If one entity maintains more than 50% control over a group consisting of corporations and one, or more, partnerships and/or sole proprietorships, all of the members of the controlled group are one taxpayer for the purpose of this section.
( d ) *Short taxable year.* Gross receipts for any taxable year of less than 12 months shall be annualized by multiplying the gross receipts for the short period by 12 and dividing the result by the number of months in the short period as required by 26 U.S.C. 448(c)(3).
( e ) *Returns and allowances.* Gross receipts for any taxable year shall be reduced by returns and allowances made during such year under 26 U.S.C. 448(c)(3).
(26 U.S.C. 448, 5061, 5731)
Exhibit 4.3


 


AMENDMENT

TO

ACTINIUM PHARMACEUTICALS, INC. WARRANT TO PURCHASE COMMON STOCK


 


Pursuant to Section 9(a) of the Warrant to Purchase Common Stock
of (the “Warrant”) of Actinium Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (the “Company”), originally dated December
17, 2012, issued to Bioche Asset Management, LCC in the amount of 721,068 warrant shares, the Board of Directors of the Company
has duly adopted a resolution approving this Amendment to the Warrant to extend the term of the Warrant to February 21, 2022 as
follows:


 


	 	1.	Section 1 of the Warrant is hereby amended to read in its entirety as follows:




 


“Term
of Warrant. Subject to the terms and conditions set forth herein, this Warrant shall be exercisable, in whole or in part,
during the term commencing (“Issuance Date”) December 17, 2012 (the “Warrant Issue Date”),
and ending at 5:00 p.m., Eastern Time on February 21, 2022 and shall be void thereafter.”


 


	 	2.	All other terms and provisions of the Warrant shall remain unchanged and in full force and effect as written.




 


IN WITNESS WHEREOF, this
Amendment to the Warrant is made effective this 8th day of November, 2018.


 


	 	ACTINIUM PHARMACEUTICALS, INC.
	 	 	 
	 	By:	/s/ David Nicholson
	 	Name:	David Nicholson
	 	Title:	Chairman Compensation Committee
Exhibit 99.7
 CONSENT OF DIRECTOR-NOMINEE
 Company Registration
Statement
  July 15, 2011
    /s/ Allen T. McInnesAllen T. McInnes
§ 404.1503 Who makes disability and blindness determinations. ( a ) *State agencies.* State agencies make disability and blindness determinations for the Commissioner for most persons living in the State. State agencies make these disability and blindness determinations under regulations containing performance standards and other administrative requirements relating to the disability and blindness determination function. States have the option of turning the function over to the Federal Government if they no longer want to make disability determinations. Also, the Commissioner may take the function away from any State which has substantially failed to make disability and blindness determinations in accordance with these regulations. Subpart Q of this part contains the rules the States must follow in making disability and blindness determinations.
( b ) *Social Security Administration.* The Social Security Administration will make disability and blindness determinations for— ( 1 ) Any person living in a State which is not making for the Commissioner any disability and blindness determinations or which is not making those determinations for the class of claimants to which that person belongs; and
( 2 ) Any person living outside the United States.
( c ) *What determinations are authorized.* The Commissioner has authorized the State agencies and the Social Security Administration to make determinations about— ( 1 ) Whether you are disabled or blind;
( 2 ) The date your disability or blindness began; and
( 3 ) The date your disability or blindness stopped.
( d ) *Review of State Agency determinations.* On review of a State agency determination or redetermination of disability or blindness we may find that— ( 1 ) You are, or are not, disabled or blind, regardless of what the State agency found;
( 2 ) Your disability or blindness began earlier or later than the date found by the State agency; and
( 3 ) Your disability or blindness stopped earlier or later than the date found by the State agency.
[46 FR 29204, May 29, 1981, as amended at 52 FR 33926, Sept. 9, 1987; 62 FR 38451, July 18, 1997; 65 FR 34957, June 1, 2000; 71 FR 16443, Mar. 31, 2006; 72 FR 51177, Sept. 6, 2007; 82 FR 5864, Jan. 18, 2017]
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY HIGH

 2,170

 3,765

 4,684

 5,022

 7,156

 7,348

 7,251

 8,227

 7,808

 6,295

 5,655

 4,209

 3,590

 3,559

 3,447

 3,742

 4,038

 4,193

 5,673

 6,062

 6,057

 5,330

 6,024

 6,225

 5,383

 3,516

 3,540

 3,539

 4,706

 4,888

 4,901

 343

 552

 767

 932

 1,048

 1,064

 1,143

 1,073

 1,014

 914

 860

 731

 818

 687

 748

 773

 737

 731

 806

 1,015

 913

 802

 785

 863

 719

 617

 616

 616

 640

 664

 921

 947

 1,757

 2,066

 2,546

 2,987

 2,941

 3,120

 3,214

 3,217

 2,945

 2,634

 2,312

 2,128

 1,773

 1,617

 1,596

 1,502

 1,694

 2,393

 2,902

 2,517

 2,197

 2,397

 2,536

 2,232

 1,825

 1,787

 1,888

 2,229

 2,273

 2,323

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

MAY 2016 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: June 10, 2016

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

PITTSBURG TOP ON THE SACRAMENTO RIVER
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY HIGH

 433

 452

 513

 537

 513

 474

 521

 509

 535

 470

 512

 472

 490

 478

 467

 520

 482

 534

 469

 513

 501

 531

 548

 490

 495

 555

 553

 530

 539

 563

 534

 301

 333

 354

 329

 311

 345

 355

 383

 403

 399

 418

 366

 386

 392

 372

 369

 369

 370

 392

 371

 375

 379

 399

 408

 404

 415

 452

 442

 433

 434

 426

 365

 382

 397

 396

 400

 406

 430

 431

 450

 442

 451

 438

 442

 438

 433

 429

 429

 422

 429

 430

 428

 440

 451

 449

 470

 485

 497

 488

 496

 508

 494

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

AUGUST 2009 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: September 2, 2009

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

DELTA MENDOTA CANAL AT CHECK 13 (O'NEILL)
# C_2012276EN.01000701.xml

| 13.9.2012 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 276/7 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

13.9.2012

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 276/7

---

Information communicated by Member States regarding closure of fisheries

2012/C 276/04

In accordance with Article 35(3) of Council Regulation (EC) No 1224/2009 of 20 November 2009 establishing a Community control system for ensuring compliance with the rules of the common fisheries policy (1), a decision has been taken to close the fishery as set down in the following table:

1

| Date and time of closure | 10.8.2012 |
| --- | --- |
| Duration | 10.8.2012-31.12.2012 |
| Member State | Belgium |
| Stock or group of stocks | WHG/08. |
| Species | Whiting (Merlangius merlangus) |
| Zone | VIII |
| Type(s) of fishing vessels | — |
| Reference number | FS23TQ43 |

Date and time of closure

10.8.2012

Duration

10.8.2012-31.12.2012

Member State

Belgium

Stock or group of stocks

WHG/08.

Species

Whiting (Merlangius merlangus)

Merlangius merlangus

Zone

VIII

Type(s) of fishing vessels

—

Reference number

FS23TQ43

---

(1)  OJ L 343, 22.12.2009, p. 1.

1

---