alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 4.1

 


	

    	
NOT VALID   UNLESS COUNTERSIGNED BY TRANSFER AGENT. INCORPORATED UNDER THE LAWS OF THE   STATE OF DELAWARE. NUMBER DIPEXIUM Pharmaceuticals, Inc. SHARES 9000000.00   CUSIP NO. 25456J 10 4 AUTHORIZED COMMON STOCK: 30,000,000 SHARES PAR VALUE: $0.001   This Certifies that * SPECIMEN * Is The Record Holder Of **ZERO HUNDRED   THOUSAND** Fully paid and non-assessable shares of Common Stock of Dipexium   Pharamaceuticals, Inc. transferable on the books of the Corporation in person   or by duly authorized attorney upon surrender of this Certificate is not   valid until countersigned by the Transfer Agent and registered by the   Registrar. Witness the facsimile seal of the Corporation and the facsimile   signatures of its duly authorized officers. Dated: Month Day, Year EXECUTIVE   CHAIRMAN PRESIDENT AND SECRETARY DIPEXIUM PHARMACEUTICALS INC. Seal DELWARE   NOT VALID UNLESS COUNTERSIGNED BY TRANSFER AGENT Countersigned by VStock   Transfer, LLC Cedarhurst, New York 11516 #11-C • Copyright© 2004 / Reynolds   Graphics, Inc. / Salt Lake City, Utah
    




 









 


	

    	
The following   abbreviations, when used in the inscription on the face of this certificate,   shall be construed as though they were written out in full according to   applicable laws or regulations. TEN COM = as tenants in common TEN ENT = as   tenants by the entireties JT TEN = as joint tenants with the right of   survivorship and not as tenants in common UNIF GIFT MIN ACT Custodian (Cust)   (Minor) Act (State) Additional abbreviations may also be used though not in   the above list. For value received, hereby sell, assign and transfer unto   PLEASE INSERT SOCIAL SECURITY OR OTHER IDENTIFYING NUMBER OF ASSIGNEE:   (PLEASE PRINT OR TYPEWRITE NAME AND ADDRESS, INCLUDING ZIP CODE, OF ASSIGNEE)   shares of the capital stock represented by the within Certificate, and do   hereby irrevocably constitute and appoint , Attorney to transfer the said   stock on the books of the within named Corporation with full power of   substitution in the premises. Dated X THE SIGNATURE TO THIS ASSIGNMENT MUST   CORRESPOND WITH THE NAME AS WRITTEN UPON THE FACE OF THIS CERTIFICATE. THE   SIGNATURE(S) MUST BE GUARANTEED BY AN ELIGIBLE GUARANTOR INSTITUTION (Banks,   Stockbrokers, Savings and Loan Associations and Credit Unions). SIGNATURE   GUARANTEED: TRANSFER FEE WILL APPLY
#### William SANDRIDGE, Appellant, v. Diane KACMARIK; John Doe; Securenet5123079@aol.com; Kim Matthews, Appellees. *513William Sandridge, Appellant, v. Kim Matthews, in her official capacity as a member of the Kansas City Missouri Police Department and in her individual capacity; Daniel J. Haus, in his official capacity as an employee of the Kansas City Missouri Police Department and in his individual capacity; Kay Barnes, Mayor, in her official capacity as a Member of the Board of Police Commissioners; Karl Zobrist, in his official capacity as a member of the Board of Police Commissioners of Kansas City, Missouri; Javier M. Perez, in his official capacity as a member of the Board of Police Commissioners of Kansas City, Missouri; Angela Wasson-Hunt, in her official capacity as a Member of the Board of Police Commissioners of Kansas City, Missouri; James Wilson, in his official capacity as a Member of the Board of Police Commissioners of Kansas City, Missouri; John Doe, 1, in his official capacity as a member of the Kansas City, Missouri Police Department; John Doe, 2, in his official capacity as a member of the Kansas City, Missouri Police Department, Appellees. William Sandridge, Appellant, v. Everett Rice, in his official capacity as Sheriff of Pinellas County Sheriffs Department; Timothy Palella, in his official capacity as a member of the Pinellas County Sheriffs Department; Joe Manning, in his official capacity as a member of the Pinellas County Sheriffs Department; Sergeant Vinson, in his official capacity as a member of Pinellas County Sheriffs Department; William Ludlow, in his official capacity as a member of the Pinellas County Sheriffs Department; Pinellas County Sheriffs Department, through the Pinellas County Board of County Commissioners, et al.; Diane Kacmarik, in her official capacity as an employee of WTSP-TV, and in her individual capacity; Securenet5123079@aol.com, in its official and individual capacity; Pinellas County Board of County Commissioners, Appellees.

Nos. 05-1394, 05-1397, 05-2058.

United States Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit.

Submitted: May 2, 2006.

Filed: Aug. 2, 2006.

William Sandridge, Kansas City, MO, pro se.

Robert L. Ortbals, Jr., Attorney General’s Office, Jefferson City, MO, Lisa Sander Morris, Legal Advisor’s Office, Daniel J. Haus, Kansas City Police Department, Kansas City, MO, for Appellees.

Virginia Hurtubise Murray, Attorney General’s Office, Jefferson City, MO, for Appellant.

Before RILEY, MAGILL, and GRUENDER, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

William Sandridge appeals the district court’s1 dismissals of his civil rights com*514plaints. Sandridge has provided no valid basis, and we find none, for overturning the dismissals of his repetitive lawsuits. Accordingly, we affirm. *See*8th Cir. R. 47B.

1

. The Honorable Ortrie D. Smith, United States District Judge for the Western District of Missouri.
### SUBCHAPTER III—UNITED STATES ASSISTANCE TO DEVELOPING COUNTRIES
§ 9.220 Pine Mountain-Cloverdale Peak. ( a ) *Name.* The name of the viticultural area described in this section is “Pine Mountain-Cloverdale Peak”. For purposes of part 4 of this chapter, “Pine Mountain-Cloverdale Peak” is a term of viticultural significance.
( b ) *Approved maps.* The three United States Geological Survey 1:24,000 scale topographic maps used to determine the boundary of the Pine Mountain-Cloverdale Peak viticultural area are titled: ( 1 ) Asti Quadrangle—California, 1998;
( 2 ) Cloverdale Quadrangle—California, 1960, photoinspected 1975; and
( 3 ) Highland Springs Quadrangle—California, 1959, photorevised 1978.
( c ) *Boundary.* The Pine Mountain-Cloverdale Peak viticultural area is located in Mendocino and Sonoma Counties, California. The boundary of the Pine Mountain-Cloverdale Peak viticultural area is as described below: ( 1 ) The beginning point is on the Asti map at the intersection of Pine Mountain Road and the Sonoma-Mendocino County line, section 35, T12N, R10W. From the beginning point, proceed southwesterly on Pine Mountain Road to its intersection with a light duty road known locally as Green Road, section 33, T12N, R10W; then
( 2 ) Proceed northerly on Green Road approximately 500 feet to its first intersection with the 1,600-foot contour line, section 33, T12N, R10W; then
( 3 ) Proceed northwesterly along the meandering 1,600-foot contour line, crossing onto the Cloverdale map in section 32, T12N, R10W, and continue to the contour line's intersection with the eastern boundary line of section 31, T12N, R10W; then
( 4 ) Proceed straight north along the eastern boundary line of section 31, crossing the Sonoma-Mendocino line, to the boundary line's intersection with the 1,600-foot contour line on the west side of Section 29, T12N, R10W; then
( 5 ) Proceed northeasterly along the meandering 1,600-foot contour line to its intersection with the intermittent Ash Creek, section 29, T12N, R10W; then
( 6 ) Proceed northeasterly in a straight line, crossing onto the Asti map, to the unnamed 2,769-foot peak located south of Salty Spring Creek, section 20, T12N, R10W; then
( 7 ) Continue northeasterly in a straight line, crossing onto the Highland Springs map, to the unnamed 2,792-foot peak in the northeast quadrant of section 21, T12N, R10W; then
( 8 ) Proceed east-southeasterly in a straight line, crossing onto the Asti map, to the unnamed 2,198-foot peak in section 23, T12N, R10W; and then
( 9 ) Proceed south-southeasterly in a straight line, returning to the beginning point.
[T.D. TTB-96, 76 FR 66637, Oct. 27, 2011]
#### § 218.35 When an employee age annuity ends.

An employee annuity based on age ends with the last day of the month before the month in which the employee dies.
#### In the Matter of the Claim of Max Berman, Respondent, against Philip Berman, Doing Business as Leader Lamp Manufacturing Company, et al., Appellants. State Industrial Board, Respondent.

All concur.
§ 234.31 Regular employee retirement and supplemental annuities. A regular employee retirement annuity or a supplemental annuity which is unpaid at the death of the employee is payable in the following order and amounts: ( a ) A surviving spouse, who was “living with” (see § 234.21) the employee at the time of the employee's death, receives the full amount of the unpaid annuity.
( b ) Each person who paid the employee's burial expenses receives a share of the unpaid annuities in the same proportion that he or she paid the burial expenses, but only to the extent that he or she is not reimbursed by the LSDP. If a payer of the employee's burial expenses dies before negotiating his or her check, that payment becomes payable to his or her estate.
( c ) Surviving children of the employee receive equal shares.
( d ) Surviving grandchildren of the employee receive equal shares.
( e ) Surviving parents of the employee each receive equal shares.
( f ) Surviving brothers and sisters of the employee receive equal shares. Half blood brothers and sisters share equally with full blood brothers and sisters.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<CIK> 0000791231
<NAME> 85B.TXT
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1995
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1995
<CASH>                                          77,485
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   52,174
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               129,659
<PP&E>                                       5,588,219
<DEPRECIATION>                               3,804,386
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,913,492
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           36,584
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                   1,876,908
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 1,913,492
<SALES>                                        491,135
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               539,797
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  718,040
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (178,243)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          (178,243)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (178,243)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  (22.09)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
Electrical Conductivity, UMHOS

Day High Low Mean

1 0 0 0

2 0 0 0

3 0 0 0

4 0 0 0

5 0 0 0

6 0 0 0

7 0 0 0

8 0 0 0

9 0 0 0

10 0 0 0

11 0 0 0

12 0 0 0

13 0 0 0

14 0 0 0

15 0 0 0

16 0 0 0

17 0 0 0

18 0 0 0

19 0 0 0

20 0 0 0

21 0 0 0

22 0 0 0

23 0 0 0

24 0 0 0

25 0 0 0

26 0 0 0

27 0 0 0

28 0 0 0

COMMENT(S):

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

Historical Archive and Report Database

Pittsburg TopOn The Sacramento River

Period: February 2023 Run Date: 11/27/2023
[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 75 (Tuesday, April 19, 2011)]
[Notices]
[Page 21892]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2011-9372]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket No. AD11-3-009]


Review of Cost Submittals by Other Federal Agencies for 
Administering Part I of the Federal Power Act; Notice Requesting 
Questions and Comments on Fiscal Year 2010 Other Federal Agency Cost 
Submissions

    In its Order On Rehearing Consolidating Administrative Annual 
Charges Bill Appeals And Modifying Annual Charges Billing Procedures, 
109 FERC ] 61,040 (2004) (October 8 Order) the Commission set forth an 
annual process for Other Federal Agencies (OFAs) to submit their costs 
related to Administering Part I of the Federal Power Act. Pursuant to 
the established process, the Director of the Financial Services 
Division, Office of the Executive Director, on October 1, 2010, issued 
a letter requesting the OFAs to submit their costs by January 3, 2011 
using the OFA Cost Submission Form.
    Upon receipt of the agency submissions, the Commission posted the 
information in eLibrary, and issued, on March 9, 2011, a notice 
announcing the date for a technical conference to review the submitted 
costs. On March 24, 2011, the Commission held the technical conference. 
Technical conference transcripts, submitted cost forms, and detailed 
supporting documents are all available for review under Docket No. 
AD11-3. These documents are accessible on-line at http://www.ferc.gov, 
using the ``eLibrary'' link and are available for review in the 
Commission's Public Reference Room in Washington, DC.
    Interested parties may file specific questions and comments on the 
FY 2010 OFA cost submissions with the Commission under Docket No. AD11-
3-009, no later than April 26, 2011. Once filed, the Commission will 
forward the questions and comments to the OFAs for response.
    Anyone with questions pertaining to the technical conference or 
this notice should contact W. Doug Foster at (202) 502-6118 (via e-mail 
at <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#4b2f243e2c652d24383f2e390b2d2e3928652c243d"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="a1c5ced4c68fc7ced2d5c4d3e1c7c4d3c28fc6ced7">[email protected]</span></a>), or Fannie Kingsberry at (202) 502-6108 (via 
e-mail at <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#5c3a3d32323539723735323b2f3e392e2e251c3a392e3f723b332a"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="1274737c7c7b773c797b7c7561707760606b52747760713c757d64">[email protected]</span></a>).

    Dated: April 12, 2011.
Kimberly D. Bose,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2011-9372 Filed 4-18-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
###### Editorial Note on Part 44

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 44 appear by T.D. ATF-464, 66 FR 43480, Aug. 20, 2001, and T.D. ATF-480, 67 FR 30801-30803, May 8, 2002.

#### § 44.127 Approval of bond and extension of coverage of bond.

No person shall commence operations under any bond, nor extend his operations, until he receives from the appropriate TTB officer notice of his approval of the bond or of an appropriate extension of coverage of the bond required under this part.

(72 Stat. 1421; 26 U.S.C. 5711)
[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 12 (Wednesday, January 19, 2011)]
[Notices]
[Page 3098]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2011-943]



[[Page 3098]]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE

Office of the Secretary


Advisory Committee Meeting Cancellation

AGENCY: Missile Defense Agency (MDA), DoD.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: On Tuesday, January 4, 2011 (Volume 76, Number 2, Page 335) 
the Department of Defense announced meeting date changes to the closed 
meetings of the Missile Defense Advisory Committee. Due to 
administrative matters, these meetings scheduled for January 19-20, 
2011, have been cancelled.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mr. David Bagnati, Designated Federal 
Officer at <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#571a131614173a3336793a3e3b"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="0548414446456861642b686c69">[email protected]</span></a>, phone/voice mail 703-695-6438, or mail at 7100 
Defense Pentagon, Washington, DC 20301-7100.

    Dated: January 11, 2011.
Morgan F. Park,
Alternate OSD Federal Register Liaison Officer, Department of Defense.
[FR Doc. 2011-943 Filed 1-18-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 5001-06-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
###### Editorial Note on Part 555

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 555 appear by T.D. ATF-487, 68 FR 3748, Jan. 24, 2003.

#### § 555.128 Discontinuance of business.

Where an explosive materials business or operations is discontinued and succeeded by a new licensee or new permittee, the records prescribed by this subpart shall appropriately reflect such facts and shall be delivered to the successor. Where discontinuance of the business or operations is absolute, the records required by this subpart must be delivered within 30 days following the business or operations discontinuance to any ATF office located in the region in which the business was located, or to the ATF Out-of-Business Records Center, 244 Needy Road, Martinsburg, West Virginia 25405. Where State law or local ordinance requires the delivery of records to other responsible authority, the Chief, Federal Explosives Licensing Center may arrange for the delivery of the records required by this subpart to such authority. (See also, § 555.61.)

[T.D. ATF-290, 54 FR 53054, Dec. 27, 1989, as amended by T.D. ATF-446a, 66 FR 19089, Apr. 13, 2001; ATF No. 1, 68 FR 13792, Mar. 20, 2003; ATF-11F, 73 FR 57242, Oct. 2, 2008; ATF 2013R-9F, 79 FR 46694, Aug. 11, 2014]
#### UNITED STATES of America, Appellee, v. Ricardo FONSECA, Appellant.

No. 05-3557.

United States Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit.

Submitted July 27, 2006.

Decided Aug. 1, 2006.

Robert Christopher Sigler, U.S. Attorney’s Office, Omaha, NE, for Appellee.

Ricardo Fonseca, Correction Corporation of America, Leavenworth, KS, Rebecca J. Smith, Omaha, NE, pro se.

Before RILEY, COLLOTON, and GRUENDER, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

Pursuant to a written plea agreement, Ricardo Fonseca pleaded guilty to possessing 500 grams or more of methamphetamine mixture with intent to distribute, in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 841(a)(1). The district court1 sentenced him to 108 months in prison and 5 years of supervised release. On appeal, he argues that the court should have allowed him to withdraw his guilty plea or should have compelled the government to file a downward departure motion based on substantial assistance because the government’s decision not to do so was irrational and made in bad faith.

We conclude that Fonseca knowingly and voluntarily waived both of these claims in his plea agreement. *See United States v. Olano,*507 U.S. 725, 733-34, 113 S.Ct. 1770, 123 L.Ed.2d 508 (1993) (defining waiver and holding that waiver precludes appellate review even for plain error); *United States v. Stricklin,*342 F.3d 849, 850 (8th Cir.2003) (per curiam) (enforcing defendant’s waiver of his right to withdraw his guilty plea).

Accordingly, we affirm the judgment of the district court.

1

. The Honorable Laurie Smith Camp, United States District Judge for the District of Nebraska.
§ 404.2102 Purpose and scope. This subpart describes the rules under which the Commissioner will pay the State VR agencies for VR services. Payment will be provided for VR services provided on behalf of disabled individuals under one or more of the provisions discussed in § 404.2101. ( a ) Sections 404.2101 through 404.2103 describe the purpose of these regulations and the meaning of terms we frequently use in them.
( b ) Section 404.2104 explains how State VR agencies may participate in the payment program under this subpart.
( c ) [Reserved]
( d ) Sections 404.2108 through 404.2109 describe the requirements and conditions under which we will pay a State VR agency under this subpart.
( e ) Sections 404.2110 through 404.2111 describe when an individual has completed a continuous period of SGA and when VR services will be considered to have contributed to that period.
( f ) Section 404.2112 describes when payment will be made to a VR agency because an individual's disability benefits are continued based on his or her participation in a VR program which we have determined will increase the likelihood that he or she will not return to the disability rolls.
( g ) Sections 404.2114 through 404.2115 describe services for which payment will be made.
( h ) Section 404.2116 describes the filing deadlines for claims for payment for VR services.
( i ) Section 404.2117 describes the payment conditions.
( j ) [Reserved]
( k ) Section 404.2119 describes how we will make payment to State VR agencies for rehabilitation services.
( l ) Sections 404.2120 and 404.2121 describe the audits and the prepayment and postpayment validation reviews we will conduct.
( m ) Section 404.2122 discusses confidentiality of information and records.
( n ) Section 404.2123 provides for the applicability of other Federal laws and regulations.
( o ) Section 404.2127 provides for the resolution of disputes.
[48 FR 6293, Feb. 10, 1983, as amended at 55 FR 8454, Mar. 8, 1990; 59 FR 11912, Mar. 15, 1994; 62 FR 38452, July 18, 1997; 68 FR 40123, July 7, 2003; 83 FR 62456, Dec. 4, 2018]
Editorial Note on Part 53
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 53 appear by T.D. ATF-447, 66 FR 19088, Apr. 13, 2001.

§ 53.155 Extension of time for filing returns. ( a ) *In general.* Ordinarily, no extension of time will be granted for filing any return statement or other document required with respect to the taxes impose by chapter 32, because the information required for the filing of those documents is under normal circumstances readily available. However, if because of temporary conditions beyond the taxpayer's control, a taxpayer believes an extension of time for filing is justified, the taxpayer may apply to the appropriate TTB officer for an extension. An extension of time for filing a return does not operate to extend the time for payment of the tax or any part of the tax unless so specified in the extension. For extensions of time for payment of the tax, see § 53.156.
( b ) *Application for extension of time.* The application for an extension of time for filing the return shall be addressed to the appropriate TTB officer with whom the return is to be filed and must contain a full recital of the causes for the delay. It should be made on or before the due date of the return, and failure to do so many indicate negligence and constitute sufficient cause for denial. It should, where possible, be made sufficiently early to permit consideration of the matter and reply before what otherwise would be the due date of the return.
( c ) *Filing the return.* If an extension of time for filing the return is granted, a return shall be filed before the expiration of the period of extension.
### subpart vi—development assistance for micro, small, and medium-sized enterprises

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Pub. L. 115–428, §4(j), Jan. 9, 2019, 132 Stat. 5516, substituted "DEVELOPMENT ASSISTANCE FOR MICRO, SMALL, AND MEDIUM-SIZED ENTERPRISES" for "MICROENTERPRISE DEVELOPMENT ASSISTANCE" in subpart heading.

#### Prior Provisions

A prior subpart VI, consisting of sections 2211 to 2213, related to Alliance for Progress, prior to repeal by Pub. L. 95–424, title I, §102(g)(1)(A), title VI, §605, Oct. 6, 1978, 92 Stat. 942, 961, effective Oct. 1, 1978.