alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**EXHIBIT12.1**

 

**FORM 10-Q**

**PACCARFINANCIAL CORP.**

 

**COMPUTATION OF RATIO OF EARNINGS TO FIXED CHARGES**

 

**PURSUANT TO SEC REPORTING REQUIREMENTS (1)**

(Millions of Dollars)

 
| ** **                         | ** ** | **Nine Months Ended  September 30** | ** ** |
|------------------------------------|------------|-------------------------------------|------------|
| ** **                         |       | **2004**                            |       | **2003** |   |
|                               |       |                                |       |   |   |
| FIXED CHARGES                      |       |                                |       |   |   |
| Interest expense                   | ** ** | **$**                               | **48.9**   |   | $ | 61.8 |   |
| Portion of rentals deemed interest | ** ** | **1.0**                             |       | 1.0 |   |
|                               |       |                                |       |   |   |
| TOTAL FIXED CHARGES                | ** ** | **$**                               | **49.9**   |   | $ | 62.8 |   |
|                               |       |                                |       |   |   |
| EARNINGS                           |       |                                |       |   |   |
| Income before income taxes         | ** ** | **$**                               | **81.5**   |   | $ | 55.7 |   |
| Fixed charges                      | ** ** | **49.9**                            |       | 62.8 |   |
|                               |       |                                |       |   |   |
| EARNINGS AS DEFINED                | ** ** | **$**                               | **131.4**  |   | $ | 118.5 |   |
|                               |       |                                |       |   |   |
| RATIO OF EARNINGS TO FIXED CHARGES | ** ** | **2.63**                            | **x**      | 1.89 | x |

 

----

(1)  The method of computing the ratio of earningsto fixed charges shown above complies with SEC reporting requirements butdiffers from the method called for in the Support Agreement between the Companyand PACCAR as shown in Exhibit 12.2.

 

1

----
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY HIGH

 28,412

 29,768

 29,119

 29,238

 28,551

 27,251

 26,777

 27,214

 26,073

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 20,534

 23,242

 22,175

 21,321

 21,157

 21,146

 22,950

 23,379

 24,408

 25,865

 22,958

 23,236

 15,406

 14,761

 14,809

 15,653

 15,887

 16,384

 16,749

 18,173

 17,053

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 18,103

 13,556

 14,849

 14,356

 14,558

 14,110

 13,849

 13,526

 13,773

 14,355

 14,736

 13,645

 21,219

 21,721

 21,930

 21,663

 22,257

 21,970

 22,086

 22,528

 22,763

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 19,749

 18,598

 18,600

 18,134

 17,788

 17,566

 17,817

 18,672

 19,292

 20,171

 18,834

 18,895

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

OCTOBER 2003 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: November 10, 2003

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

PORT CHICAGO BOTTOM IN SUISUN BAY
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA

FOURTH DISTRICT

SHANE HARDISON,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellee.

No. 4D20-301

[June 4, 2020]

Appeal of order denying rule 3.850 motion from the Circuit Court for 

the Seventeenth Judicial Circuit, Broward County; Mariya Weekes, Judge; 

L.T. Case Nos. 11-003397CF10A & 16-000894CF10A.

Shane Hardison, Pahokee, pro se.

No appearance required for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.

GROSS, FORST and KLINGENSMITH, JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
(No. 73-CC-316

#### Arthur G. Hake, Claimant, *vs.*State of Illinois, Superintendent of Public Instruction, Respondent.

*Opinion filed October 11, 1973.*

Arthur G. Hake, Claimant, pro se.

William J. Scott, Attorney General; Douglas G. Olson, Assistant Attorney General, for Respondent.

Per Curiam.
<PAGE>   1
                                   EXHIBIT 21

                       PENNROCK FINANCIAL SERVICES CORP.
                         SUBSIDIARIES OF THE REGISTRANT

The registrant has one direct wholly-owned subsidiary, Blue Ball National Bank.
The Bank, a national bank and a member of the Federal Reserve System, is engaged
in the commercial, retail and trust business.

Blue Ball National Bank has two direct wholly-owned subsidiaries. One
subsidiary, Atlantic Regional Mortgage Corporation ("ARMCO"), is incorporated
under the laws of Pennsylvania for the purpose of originating and selling
residential mortgage loans in the secondary market. ARMCO was liquidated in 1997
under a formal liquidation plan adopted on September 30, 1997, and is currently
inactive. The other subsidiary, PennRock Insurance Group, Inc. ("PIGI"), is a
Pennsylvania corporation organized for the sale of annuities and other types of
insurance products. PIGI began operations in the first quarter of 1999.
**CERTIFICATIONS**Exhibit 31.1I, S. W. Yong, certify that:1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Trio-Tech International, a Californiacorporation;2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact oromit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstancesunder which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by thisreport;3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included inthis report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operationsand cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;4. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:     (a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls andprocedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating tothe registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within thoseentities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;     (b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures andpresented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls andprocedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and     (c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourthfiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonablylikely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and5. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the auditcommittee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):     (a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation ofinternal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect theregistrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and     (b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have asignificant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.Dated:November 13, 2006                                                 /s/ S. W. YONG   S. W. Yong, Chief Executive Officer   and President (Principal Executive Officer)
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY HIGH

 17,807

 16,011

 13,659

 15,140

 17,573

 16,967

 19,828

 19,071

 18,534

 17,515

 18,475

 20,019

 16,709

 19,044

 15,065

 13,980

 14,057

 15,615

 16,566

 16,189

 16,955

 16,320

 13,077

 15,913

 18,061

 18,220

 18,378

 17,116

 16,249

 16,846

 16,203

 3,853

 3,957

 4,859

 4,680

 4,607

 4,733

 4,170

 3,609

 3,652

 4,524

 5,070

 4,421

 5,461

 4,331

 4,931

 5,273

 3,932

 4,552

 5,063

 5,215

 4,490

 4,218

 3,252

 5,808

 5,965

 5,878

 5,881

 5,435

 5,662

 5,123

 5,566

 10,059

 9,512

 9,511

 9,521

 8,747

 9,149

 9,639

 9,657

 9,525

 10,744

 11,233

 11,436

 10,847

 10,593

 9,827

 9,941

 8,168

 8,977

 9,534

 9,497

 8,996

 9,068

 9,033

 10,896

 11,732

 11,653

 11,320

 10,951

 10,806

 11,046

 10,171

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

AUGUST 2011 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: September 22, 2011

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

PORT CHICAGO TOP IN SUISUN BAY
#### § 1002.303 Is an individual required to file his or her complaint with VETS?

No. The individual may initiate a private action for relief against a State or private employer if he or she decides not to apply to VETS for assistance.
EXHIBIT 12
                    BellSouth Corporation
          Computation Of Earnings To Fixed Charges
                    (Dollars In Millions)





                                             
                                             For the Three
                                              Months Ended
                                               March 31,
                                                  1998
1. Earnings                                  
                                             
   (a) Income from continuing operations      $   1,637
before deductions for taxes and interest
                                             
   (b) Portion of rental expense                     22
representative of interest factor
                                             
   (c) Equity in losses from less-than-50%           16
owned investments (accounted for under the
equity method of accounting)
                                             
   (d) Excess of earnings over distributions 
of less-than-50%-owned investments           
(accounted for under the equity mehtod of    
accounting)                                         (12)
                                             
     TOTAL                                    $   1,663
                                             
2. Fixed Charges                             
                                             
   (a) Interest                               $     199
                                             
   (b) Portion of rental expense             
representative of interest factor                    22
                                             
     TOTAL                                    $     221
                                             
   Ratio (1 divided by 2)                           7.5
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY HIGH

 21,202

 19,713

 18,670

 18,115

 18,509

 19,033

 23,369

 18,910

 18,994

 16,148

 15,734

 15,358

 17,218

 17,483

 13,514

 11,100

 10,080

 12,200

 13,226

 13,471

 16,480

 20,690

 18,164

 18,697

 16,952

 17,237

 15,938

 14,463

 13,763

 13,918

 12,490

 10,219

 12,217

 10,104

 9,718

 8,579

 9,340

 12,091

 10,005

 7,929

 6,250

 5,403

 4,768

 4,770

 4,618

 4,495

 3,173

 2,483

 2,797

 3,739

 3,728

 4,989

 6,965

 6,195

 5,995

 5,521

 5,535

 5,004

 4,831

 4,401

 4,352

 4,229

 17,430

 16,400

 15,254

 14,360

 14,018

 14,289

 16,797

 14,902

 13,643

 11,748

 11,116

 10,803

 10,447

 10,794

 9,114

 7,272

 7,005

 7,839

 8,308

 8,320

 9,593

 12,093

 11,806

 11,955

 11,387

 11,293

 10,784

 10,058

 9,651

 9,651

 8,956

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

DECEMBER 2019 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: January 7, 2020

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

PORT CHICAGO TOP IN SUISUN BAY
Document headings vary by document type but may contain
                    the following: the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document
the number of the CFR title and the number of each part
                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly
                      related to
the agency docket number / agency internal file number
the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in
                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory
                      Actions See the
                    Document Drafting Handbook
                    for more details.
 Federal Communications Commission
 The following items have been deleted from the list of Agenda items scheduled for consideration at the Thursday, April 7, 2011, Open Meeting and previously listed in the Commission's Notice of March 31, 2011. These items have been adopted by the Commission. Item No.
Bureau
Subject5
WIRELESS TELE-COMMUNICATIONS
TITLE: Amending Parts 1, 2, 22, 24, 27, 90 and 95 of the Commission's Rules to Improve Wireless Coverage Through the Use of Signal Boosters.
                             SUMMARY: The Commission will consider a Notice of Proposed Rulemaking that will help to fill gaps in wireless coverage and expand broadband in rural and difficult-to serve areas, while protecting wireless networks from harm.6
CONSUMER & GOVERNMENTAL AFFAIRS
TITLE: Structure and Practices of the Video Relay Service Program (CG Docket No. 10-51).
                             SUMMARY: The Commission will consider a Report and Order that will adopt rules to detect and prevent fraud and abuse in the provision of video relay service (“VRS”). Also, a Further Notice of Proposed Rulemaking Proposes to require all VRS providers to obtain certification from the FCC under new, tighter certification procedures in order to receive compensation from the TRS Fund.
 Federal Communications Commission. Marlene H. Dortch, Secretary.


[FR Doc. 2011-9030 Filed 4-11-11; 11:15 am] BILLING CODE 6712-01-P
Exhibit 23.1
 CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
 
   
 15
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit 

## FILED April 13, 2006 Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 05-60305 Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus BEN LANE, Defendant-Appellant.

-------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Mississippi

USDC No. 2:04-CR-11-1

-------------------- Before SMITH, GARZA, and PRADO, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: * Ben Lane appeals his conviction following a jury trial for conspiracy to obstruct interstate commerce; aiding and abetting in the obstruction of interstate commerce; and possession of a firearm in relation to a crime of violence. First, he asserts that the district court erred in denying his motion for a judgment of acquittal. We reject this assertion, as Lane has failed to show that a reasonable jury could not have found him guilty beyond a reasonable doubt. See United States v. Sanchez , 961 F.2d 1169, 1173 (5th Cir. 1992). We find unpersuasive hisNo. 05-60305 -2- arguments that (1) a firearm discovered by police did not link him to the crime and that (2) certain witnesses were not credible. See id. Likewise, we reject Lane’s assertion that the district court erred in enhancing his sentence based upon facts that were not determined by the jury. See United States v. Mares , 402 F.3d 511, 519 (5th Cir.), cert. denied , 126 S. Ct. 43 (2005). Accordingly, the judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.
**EXHIBIT 32.1**Pursuant to the requirement set forth in Rule 13a-14(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, asamended, and Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the United States Code (18 U.S.C. Section1350), Denis Hickey, the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of IntraBioticsPharmaceuticals, Inc. (the “Company”), Officer of the Company, hereby certify that, to myknowledge:1. The Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2005, to whichthis Certification is attached as Exhibit 32.1 (the “Periodic Report”), fully complies with therequirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended;and2. The information contained in the Periodic Report fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition of the Company at the end of the periods covered by the Periodic Report and theresults of operations of the Company for the periods covered by the Periodic Report.In Witness Whereof, the undersigned have set their hands hereto as of the 27th day of October 2005./s/ Denis Hickey
Electrical Conductivity, UMHOS

Day High Low Mean

1 0 0 0

2 0 0 0

3 0 0 0

4 0 0 0

5 24,232 13,687 19,015

6 25,817 15,710 20,049

7 25,638 15,130 20,700

8 27,624 15,526 21,080

9 0 0 0

10 0 0 0

11 0 0 0

12 0 0 0

13 0 0 0

14 0 0 0

15 0 0 0

16 21,050 11,300 17,759

17 22,078 11,131 18,209

18 23,190 13,886 18,803

19 24,269 15,050 19,372

20 24,516 16,280 19,970

21 26,219 16,538 20,829

22 27,067 16,468 21,689

23 28,617 16,440 22,266

24 27,796 16,061 22,439

25 28,945 16,381 22,810

26 29,646 16,036 23,492

27 27,693 16,577 23,212

28 27,874 15,751 22,621

29 0 0 0

30 0 0 0

COMMENT(S):

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

Historical Archive and Report Database

Port Chicago Top In Suisun Bay 

Period: November 2022 Run Date: 12/8/2022
§ 771.25 Communications and pleadings. ( a ) All communications to the Government regarding the procedures set forth in this part and all pleadings, such as answers, motions, requests, or other papers or documents required or permitted to be filed under this part, relating to a proceeding pending before an administrative law judge, shall be addressed to the administrative law judge at his post of duty and the Attorney for the Government. Communications concerning proceedings not pending before an administrative law judge should be addressed to the Director of Industry Operations or Director, as the case may be.
( b ) Except to the extent required for the disposition of ex parte matters as authorized by law, no ex parte communications shall be made to or from the administrative law judge concerning the merits of the adjudication. If the administrative law judge receives or makes an ex parte communication not authorized by law, the administrative law judge shall place on the record of the proceeding: ( 1 ) All such written communications;
( 2 ) Memoranda stating the substance of all such oral communications; and
( 3 ) All written responses and memoranda stating the substance of all oral responses to paragraphs (b)(1) and (2) of this section.
§ 323.7 Effective date. ( a ) This part shall not apply to a plan approved by the Director of Unemployment and Sickness Insurance prior to the effective date of this part. However, it shall apply to any proposed revision to such plan.
( b ) Any plan in effect on the effective date of this part that has not been approved by the Director of Unemployment and Sickness Insurance shall be considered a proposed plan for purposes of § 323.5.
(No. 7008

#### International Business Machines Corporation, Claimant, *vs.*State of Illinois, Environmental Protection Agency, Respondent.

*197
      *Opinion filed February 9, 1973.*

International Business Machines Corporation, Claimant, pro se.

William J. Scott, Attorney General; William E. Webber, Assistant Attorney General, for Respondent.

Per Curiam.
(No. 6293

#### Union Linen Supply Company, Claimant, *vs.*State of Illinois, Division of Highways, Respondent.

*Opinion filed August 17, 1972.*

Union Linen Supply Company, Claimant, pro se.

William J. Scott, Attorney General; Saul R. Wexler, Assistant Attorney General, for Respondent.

Perlin, C.J.
#### § 1002.199 What priority must the employer follow if two or more returning employees are entitled to reemployment in the same position?

If two or more employees are entitled to reemployment in the same position and more than one employee has reported or applied for employment in that position, the employee who first left the position for uniformed service has the first priority on reemployment in that position. The remaining employee (or employees) is entitled to be reemployed in a position similar to that in which the employee would have been reemployed according to the rules that normally determine a reemployment position, as set out in §§ 1002.196 and 1002.197.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1997
<CASH>                                             946
<SECURITIES>                                        43
<RECEIVABLES>                                    4,167
<ALLOWANCES>                                       185
<INVENTORY>                                        423
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 5,941
<PP&E>                                          50,727
<DEPRECIATION>                                  28,944
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  32,526
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            6,137
<BONDS>                                          7,961
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         1,009
<OTHER-SE>                                      12,644
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    32,526
<SALES>                                            138
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 4,845
<CGS>                                              213
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    2,382
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 1,110
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                    66
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 183
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  1,163
<INCOME-TAX>                                       470
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                693
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       693
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .70
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .70
        


</TABLE>
#### § 320.38 Appeal to Board from decision of hearings officer.

Any claimant aggrieved by a decision of the hearings officer and any base-year employer(s) whose employee was awarded benefits, who participated in the appeal before the hearings officer, may appeal to the Board for review of the decision.

[56 FR 65681, Dec. 18, 1991]