alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 205.3 Factors considered in determining employee representative status. The following factors, among others, are considered by the Board in determining an individual's status as an employee representative: ( a ) The name of the last railroad or other employer under the Act by which the individual was employed, and the period of employment;
( b ) The present official name of the organization by which the individual is employed, as well as any other name(s) under which that organization operated previously;
( c ) The date on which the organization was founded;
( d ) The title of the position held by the individual within the organization, and the duties of said position;
( e ) The method by which the individual, or the person to whom he or she is regularly assigned or by whom he or she is regularly employed, was authorized to represent members of the organization in negotiating with their employers, the date on which the individual was so authorized, and the time period covered by said authorization;
( f ) The purpose or business of the organization as reflected by its constitution and by-laws;
( g ) The extent to which the organization is, and has been recognized as, representative of crafts or classes of employees in the railroad industry;
( h ) The extent to which the purposes and businesses of the organization are and have been to promote the interests of employees in the railroad industry as indicated by: ( 1 ) The specific employee group(s) represented; and
( 2 ) The proportion of members that are employed by railroad employers in relation to those members that are employed by non-railroad employers;
( i ) Whether the organization has been certified by the National Mediation Board as a representative of any class of employees of any company;
( j ) If the organization has not been certified as representative of any class of employees, the manner and method by which the organization determined that it was the duly authorized representative of such employees;
( k ) Whether the organization participates or is authorized to participate in the selection of labor members of the National Railroad Adjustment Board; and
( l ) Whether the organization was assisted by any carrier by railroad, express company, or sleeping car company, directly or indirectly, in its formation, in influencing employees to join the organization, financially, or in the collection of dues, fees, assessments, or any contributions payable to the organization.
#### § 202.5 Company or person under common control.

A company or person is under common control with a carrier, whenever the control (as the term is used in § 202.4) of such company or person is in the same person, persons, or company as that by which such carrier is controlled.
### §2013. NMIC requirements and review

#### (a) In general

The NMIC shall promote sharing information regarding successful law enforcement, treatment, environmental, prevention, social services, and other programs related to the production, use, or effects of methamphetamine and grants available for such programs.

#### (b) Components

The NMIC shall include—

(1) a toll-free number; and

(2) a website that provides a searchable database, which—

(A) provides information on the short-term and long-term effects of methamphetamine use;

(B) provides information regarding methamphetamine treatment and prevention programs and strategies and programs for drug endangered children, including descriptions of successful programs and strategies and contact information for such programs and strategies;

(C) provides information regarding grants for methamphetamine-related programs, including contact information and links to websites;

(D) allows a qualified entity to submit items to be posted on the website regarding successful public or private programs or other useful information related to the production, use, or effects of methamphetamine;

(E) includes a restricted section that may only be accessed by a law enforcement organization that contains successful strategies, training techniques, and other information that the Council determines helpful to law enforcement agency efforts to identify or combat the production, use, or effects of methamphetamine;

(F) allows public access to all information not in a restricted section; and

(G) contains any additional information the Council determines may be useful in identifying or combating the production, use, or effects of methamphetamine.

Thirty days after the website in paragraph (2) is operational, no funds shall be expended to continue the website methresources.gov.

#### (c) Review of posted information

#### (1) In general

Not later than 30 days after the date of submission of an item by a qualified entity, the Council shall review an item submitted for posting on the website described in subsection (b)(2)—

(A) to evaluate and determine whether the item, as submitted or as modified, meets the requirements for posting; and

(B) in consultation with the Attorney General, to determine whether the item should be posted in a restricted section of the website.

#### (2) Determination

Not later than 45 days after the date of submission of an item, the Council shall—

(A) post the item on the website described in subsection (b)(2); or

(B) notify the qualified entity that submitted the item regarding the reason such item shall not be posted and modifications, if any, that the qualified entity may make to allow the item to be posted.

(Pub. L. 109–469, title X, §1004, Dec. 29, 2006, 120 Stat. 3538.)
(No. 7020

#### Loyola University Hospital, Claimant, *vs.*State of Illinois, Department of Public Aid, Respondent.

*Opinion filed January 9, 1973.*

Loyola University Hospital, Claimant, pro se.

William J. Scott, Attorney General; Saul R. Wexler, Assistant Attorney General, for Respondent.

Per Curiam.
#### Violet G. Mayer, Respondent, v. Siegfried Mayer, Appellant.

Order unanimously modified by reducing counsel fees to $500 and as so modified affirmed, without costs. No opinion. Present — Peek, P. J., Glennon, Dore, Van Voorhis and Shientag, JJ.
#### UNIVERSAL MANUFACTURING CORPORATION, Plaintiff, v. VULCAN DENVER CORPORATION, Defendant.

Civ. A. No. 67-1463.

United States District Court W. D. Pennsylvania.

Dec. 14, 1967.

*386Leonard L. Stewart, Reding, Blackstone, Rea & Sell, Pittsburgh, Pa., for plaintiff.

OPINION

WEBER, District Judge.

In this diversity action Plaintiff, a Pennsylvania corporation, brings suit against Defendant, a Colorado corporation, having its principal place of business in Colorado. A motion has been presented requesting leave to make service on the defendant under Section 1011, subd. B of the Pennsylvania Corporation Code, 15 P.S. § 2011, upon the Secretary of the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania as is provided for non-registered corporations doing business in Pennsylvania. The statute says: “On petition, alleging conduct of business within the Commonwealth by any corporation not qualified * * * the court * * * shall authorize service to be made upon the Secretary of the Commonwealth.” All we have here is a motion which recites that defendant “does business in Pennsylvania by purchasing supplies and parts in Pennsylvania and by selling its equipment in Pennsylvania.”

Our reading of the Pennsylvania statute indicates that more is required than such a simple statement. When the Pennsylvania Act recites “on petition”, the state practice requires petitions to be verified, the within motion is not. Furthermore, the petition must allege conduct of business. We believe that a more specific allegation of facts should be presented in such a sworn petition to authorize such service. Of course, such orders are made by the court ex parte but we believe that it is incumbent upon the court to see that something more than a bare undetailed and unsworn allegation is presented in support of a petition which will cause service of process to be made upon a corporation in Colorado requiring it to appear and defend an action filed in the Western District of Pennsylvania. Subsequent to such service the defendant corporation may attack the service but we do not believe that this is a sufficient protection against undue annoyance unless the plaintiff presenting such application has been required to show a prima facie case of doing business. The motion will be denied with leave to present an application for substituted service in accordance with this Opinion.
#### § 1002.134 What type of discharge or separation from service is required for an employee to be entitled to reemployment under USERRA?

USERRA does not require any particular form of discharge or separation from service. However, even if the employee is otherwise eligible for reemployment, he or she will be disqualified if the characterization of service falls within one of four categories. USERRA requires that the employee not have received one of these types of discharge.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY HIGH

 11,835

 10,896

 7,879

 7,378

 7,019

 5,952

 3,951

 2,695

 2,214

 2,386

 2,135

 2,089

 5,235

 4,887

 4,325

 3,761

 5,047

 5,614

 6,401

 7,674

 8,995

 8,309

 8,072

 8,225

 9,404

 9,503

 8,305

 7,762

 8,250

 8,848

 8,516

 3,900

 2,925

 2,363

 1,795

 1,554

 1,088

 577

 554

 542

 555

 579

 570

 623

 736

 700

 695

 855

 870

 1,063

 1,368

 1,796

 1,699

 1,713

 1,699

 1,954

 2,205

 1,984

 2,451

 2,749

 2,578

 2,325

 7,330

 5,996

 4,323

 3,371

 2,862

 2,611

 1,768

 1,307

 1,102

 1,140

 929

 969

 1,758

 1,899

 1,551

 1,608

 1,907

 2,247

 2,828

 3,448

 4,171

 4,267

 4,273

 4,159

 4,672

 5,119

 4,798

 4,580

 4,952

 4,815

 4,772

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

MARCH 2014 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: June 6, 2014

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

PITTSBURG TOP ON THE SACRAMENTO RIVER
Exhibit



        



EXHIBIT 10.3
FOURTH AMENDMENT TO 
FRANK’S INTERNATIONAL N.V.
EMPLOYEE STOCK PURCHASE PLAN
WHEREAS, FRANK’S INTERNATIONAL N.V. (the “Company”) has heretofore adopted the FRANK’S INTERNATIONAL N.V. EMPLOYEE STOCK PURCHASE PLAN (the “Plan”), the First Amendment to the Plan, the Second Amendment to the Plan and the Third Amendment to the Plan; and
WHEREAS, the Company desires to amend the Plan in certain respects;
NOW, THEREFORE, the Plan shall be amended as follows, effective as of November 1, 2018:
1.    Section 3.2 of the Plan shall be amended to read:
Purchase of Shares.  On each Exercise Date, the amount in a Participant’s Account shall be charged with the aggregate Option Price of the largest number of whole shares of Common Stock which can be purchased with said amount. The remaining balance, if any, in such account shall be refunded to Participant via payroll within one month of the Exercise Date. If the total number of shares of Common Stock for which options are exercised on any Exercise Date exceeds the maximum number of shares then available for sale under the Plan, the Company shall allocate the available shares by reducing the Participants’ designated payroll deduction authorization percentages in order of the highest percentages until the excess is eliminated, and any remaining balance of payroll deductions credited to the account of a participant under the Plan shall be refunded to him promptly. 
2.     Section 6.5 of the Plan shall be amended to read:
Amendment of the Plan.  The Compensation Committee may at any time, or from time to time, amend the Plan in any respect, except that, without approval of the shareholders, no amendment may increase the aggregate number of shares reserved under the Plan other than as provided in Section 4.2 hereof, materially increase the benefits accruing to Participants or materially modify the requirements as to eligibility for participation in the Plan. Any amendment of the Plan must be made in accordance with applicable provisions of the Code and/or any regulations issued thereunder, any other applicable law or regulations, and the requirements of the principal exchange upon which the Common Stock is listed.
3.    As amended hereby, the Plan is specifically ratified and reaffirmed.
[Signature Page Attached]


    













IN WITNESS WHEREOF, this Fourth Amendment has been executed by a duly authorized officer of the Company, as of the date specified below and effective as set forth herein.


FRANK’S INTERNATIONAL N.V.


By:     /s/ Michael Kearney        
Name:  Michael Kearney
Title:    Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer
Dated:   October 30, 2018




2
---

Exhibit 99.6 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 
18 U.S.C. §1350, 
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 In connection with the annual report of Silver Wheaton Corp. (the Company) on Form 40-F for the period ended December 31, 2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Gary Brown, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that: (1)
     The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 ; and(2)
     The information contained in this Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
   March 31, 2010
     By: /s/ Gary BrownGary BrownChief Financial Officer


---
#### § 219.1 Introduction.

As described in parts 216 (Eligibility for an Annuity), 234 (Lump-Sum Payments), and 222 (Family Relationships), certain requirements must be met before benefits may be paid under the Railroad Retirement Act. This part contains the basic rules for evidence that is required to support a claimant's claim for monthly or lump-sum benefit payments under the Railroad Retirement Act. Part 219 describes when evidence is required and what types of documents can be used as evidence. Part 222 defines and explains family relationships for which evidence requirements are stated in part 219. Special evidence requirements for disability annuities are found in part 220 of this chapter.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of the Treasury

###### Internal Revenue Service

          - 26 CFR Part 300
          - [REG-124018-10]
          - RIN 1545-BJ65

# AGENCY:

Internal Revenue Service (IRS), Treasury.

# ACTION:

Cancellation of notice of public hearing on proposed rulemaking.

# SUMMARY:

This document cancels a public hearing on proposed rulemaking that amends the regulations relating to the imposition of user fees for enrolled agents and enrolled retirement plan agents.

# DATES:

The public hearing, originally scheduled for January 14, 2011, at 10 a.m., is cancelled.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

                        Richard A. Hurst of the Publications and Regulations Branch, Legal Processing Division, Associate Chief Counsel (Procedure and Administration), at                         *Richard.A.Hurst@irscounsel.treas.gov.*

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    A notice of public hearing that appeared in the                     **Federal Register**                     on Friday, December 10, 2010 (75 FR 76940), announced that a public hearing was scheduled for January 14, 2011, at 10 a.m., in the auditorium, Internal Revenue Building, 1111 Constitution Avenue, NW., Washington, DC. The subject of the public hearing is under section 300 of the Internal Revenue Code.                

The public comment period for these regulations expired on January 10, 2011. Outlines of topics to be discussed at the hearing were due on January 5, 2011. The notice of proposed rulemaking and notice of public hearing instructed those interested in testifying at the public hearing to submit an outline of the topics to be addressed. As of Wednesday, January 12, 2011, the taxpayer, who wished to present oral comments, has requested to withdraw. Therefore, the public hearing scheduled for January 14, 2011, is cancelled.

LaNita Van Dyke,

Chief, Publications and Regulations Branch, Legal Processing Division, Associate Chief Counsel (Procedure and Administration).

[FR Doc. 2011-921 Filed 1-12-11; 4:15 pm]

BILLING CODE 4830-01-P
#### § 228.21 Entitlement as a spouse or divorced spouse and as a survivor.

If an individual is entitled to both a spouse or divorced spouse and survivor annuity, only the larger annuity will be paid. However, if the individual so chooses, he or she may receive the smaller annuity rather than the larger annuity.
THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS

13-23-00021-CV

In the Estate of Brian Lee Doss, Deceased

On Appeal from the

County Court of Matagorda County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. PR20-0020

JUDGMENT

THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS, having considered this cause on 

appeal, concludes the judgment of the trial court should be affirmed in part and reversed 

in part, and the case should be remanded to the trial court. The Court orders the 

judgment of the trial court AFFIRMED IN PART and REVERSED IN PART, and the 

case is REMANDED for further proceedings consistent with its opinion. Costs of the 

appeal are adjudged 50% against appellant and 50% against appellee.

We further order this decision certified below for observance.

June 27, 2024
### §360c–1. Reporting

The Secretary of Health and Human Services shall annually post on the Internet Web site of the Food and Drug Administration—

(1) the number and type of class I and class II devices reclassified as class II or class III in the previous calendar year under section 360c(e)(1) of this title;

(2) the number and type of class II and class III devices reclassified as class I or class II in the previous calendar year under such section 360c(e)(1) of this title; and

(3) the number and type of devices reclassified in the previous calendar year under section 360e of this title.

(Pub. L. 112–144, title VI, §608(c), July 9, 2012, 126 Stat. 1059.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section was enacted as part of the Food and Drug Administration Safety and Innovation Act, and not as part of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act which comprises this chapter.
EXHIBIT 32
 CCFNB BANCORP, INC.
 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. § 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
  1.
    
    this report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and2.
    
    the information contained in this report fairly represents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.
  /s/ Lance O. DiehlLance O. DiehlChief Executive Officer  /s/ Jeffrey T. ArnoldJeffrey T. Arnold CPA, CIAChief Financial Officer
### §2144. Authorization of appropriations

There are authorized to be appropriated to carry out this subchapter—

(1) $250,000 for fiscal year 2001; and

(2) such sums as may be necessary for each succeeding fiscal year.

(Pub. L. 106–380, §5, Oct. 27, 2000, 114 Stat. 1449.)
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY ELEV

 221.57

 222.55

 222.81

 222.77

 222.86

 223.35

 223.76

 221.69

 222.17

 223.16

 223.60

 223.69

 223.20

 220.52

 221.04

 222.67

 222.15

 221.50

 221.00

 222.45

 222.36

 222.15

 222.59

 222.22

 222.09

 221.58

 221.29

 221.56

 220.98

 221.18

 220.98

 47,257

 49,847

 50,539

 50,433

 50,673

 51,982

 53,081

 47,572

 48,836

 51,474

 52,652

 52,893

 51,580

 44,505

 45,865

 50,166

 48,783

 47,073

 45,760

 49,580

 49,341

 48,783

 49,953

 48,969

 48,624

 47,283

 46,521

 47,230

 45,708

 46,233

 45,708

STORAGE

+1,234

+2,590

+692

-106

+240

+1,309

+1,099

-5,509

+1,264

+2,638

+1,178

+241

-1,313

-7,075

+1,360

+4,301

-1,383

-1,710

-1,313

+3,820

-239

-558

+1,170

-984

-345

-1,341

-762

+709

-1,522

+525

-525

CHANGE

1,399

1,525

1,683

1,880

1,941

2,065

2,198

2,210

2,233

2,208

2,092

1,987

2,123

2,262

2,335

2,503

2,517

2,538

2,528

2,541

2,569

2,631

2,598

2,571

2,612

2,597

2,576

2,604

2,688

2,749

2,892

PUMPING

 5,596

 5,157

 5,756

 5,585

 5,798

 5,640

 5,421

 6,054

 5,364

 5,146

 5,673

 5,913

 5,856

 5,684

 6,156

 4,793

 5,370

 6,138

 5,521

 5,399

 5,372

 5,658

 4,843

 5,312

 5,182

 5,569

 5,796

 5,730

 5,578

 5,472

 5,940

PUMPING

 2,958

 1,833

 2,132

 2,766

 2,505

 2,191

 3,017

 5,154

 2,620

 2,088

 2,864

 4,021

 4,200

 1,854

 2,060

 2,878

 5,189

 4,151

 4,489

 1,163

 2,474

 2,618

 2,793

 2,720

 2,335

 3,223

 2,202

 2,405

 2,333

 2,094

 1,680

PUMPING

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

GEN.

*

+1,566

+122

+317

+49

+305

-28

+269

+64

+209

+276

+132

+177

+184

+293

+117

+171

+604

+435

+290

+21

+177

+84

+199

+117

+151

+435

-57

+180

-452

+263

+606

OR

UNITED STATES 

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION

CONSOLIDATED STATE-FEDERAL O'NEILL FOREBAY February 7, 2007

DAILY OPERATIONS

OCTOBER 2006 RUN DATE:

IN LAKE GEN.

ACRE-FEET O'NEILL

RELEASE - C.F.S. 

TOTALS -315 71,855 0 87,010 172,472 +7,276

ACRE-FEET -315 142,524 0 172,584 342,098

SUMMARY

 588

RELEASE (ACRE-FEET)

O'NEILL GEN. 0

SAN LUIS PUMP 172,584 588

 46,023

DOS AMIGOS PUMP 342,098

DELIVERIES 

S. LUIS O'NEILL

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

CALIF. DOS AMIGOS

AQUEDUCT

6,212

6,648

6,236

6,369

6,178

6,454

6,525

6,156

6,179

6,081

6,907

7,891

7,087

1,416

6,449

7,166

6,742

6,453

6,530

5,926

4,980

5,280

5,429

4,849

4,580

5,084

5,095

5,708

4,908

4,819

4,154

 180,491

 358,004

S. LUIS

DELIV.

GAINS(+)

LOSS(-)

C.F.S.

INFLOW - C.F.S.

STATE OF CALIFORNIA

THE RESOURCES AGENCY

DEPARTMENT OF WATER RESOURCES

STATE WATER PROJECT

TOTAL 515,270

 14,432

* DAILY DEL. FIGURES UNAVAILABLE. TOT. DEL. IS INCLUDED IN COMPUTING MONTHLY TOTALS 

Table 18
### §1104. Repealed. Pub. L. 94–237, §4(c)(1), Mar. 19, 1976, 90 Stat. 244

Section, Pub. L. 92–255, title I, §104, Mar. 21, 1972, 86 Stat. 67, provided, effective June 30, 1975, that the Special Action Office for Drug Abuse Prevention, each of the positions in the Office of Director, Deputy Director, and Assistant Director, and the National Advisory Council for Drug Abuse Prevention were abolished and former subchapter II of this chapter was repealed.