alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Francisco Javier FLORES-AMPARAN, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 05-51067.

Conference Calendar.

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.

Decided Feb. 24, 2006.

Joseph H. Gay, Jr., Assistant U.S. Attorney, U.S. Attorney’s Office, Western District of Texas, San Antonio, TX, for Plaintiff-Appellee.

Philip J. Lynch, Federal Public Defender’s Office, Western District of Texas, San Antonio, TX, for Defendant-Appellant.

Before GARZA, DENNIS, and PRADO, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: *

Appealing the Judgment in a Criminal Case, Francisco Javier Flores-Amparan raises arguments that are foreclosed by *Almendarez-Torres v. United States,*523 U.S. 224, 235, 118 S.Ct. 1219, 140 L.Ed.2d 350 (1998), which held that a prior conviction is a sentencing factor under 8 U.S.C. § 1326(b)(2) and not a separate criminal offense. The Government’s motion for summary affirmance is GRANTED, and the judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.

*

 Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.
#### In the Matter of the Claim of John Lapp, Appellant, against Owl Laundry Service, Inc., et al., Respondents. State Industrial Board, Respondent.

All concur.
1Honorable Pat Priest, Jr., Senior Judge Sitting by Assignment, presiding over the

Appellant’s plea of guilty.

2Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967).

NO. 07-06-0292-CR

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE SEVENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

AT AMARILLO

PANEL C

DECEMBER 19, 2006

______________________________

STEVE GEORGE SETTLES, APPELLANT

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, APPELLEE

_________________________________

FROM THE 290TH DISTRICT COURT OF BEXAR COUNTY

CAUSE NO. 2005CR3072

 HONORABLE SHARON MACRAE, JUDGE PRESIDING1

_______________________________

Before QUINN, C.J., and HANCOCK and PIRTLE, JJ.

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Following an open plea of guilty, Appellant, Steve George Settles, was convicted of two

counts of aggravated sexual assault of a child and sentenced to life imprisonment. In

presenting this appeal, counsel has filed an Anders2 brief in support of a motion to withdraw.
2

We grant counsel’s motion and affirm.

In support of her motion to withdraw, counsel certifies that she has diligently reviewed

the record, and in her opinion, the record reflects no reversible error upon which an appeal can

be predicated. Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967);

Monroe v. State, 671 S.W.2d 583, 585 (Tex.App.–San Antonio 1984, no pet.). Thus, she

concludes the appeal is frivolous. In compliance with High v. State, 573 S.W.2d 807, 813

(Tex.Cr.App. 1978), counsel has candidly discussed why, under the controlling authorities,

there is no error in the trial court's judgment. Counsel has also shown that she sent a copy of

the brief to appellant and informed appellant that, in her view, the appeal is without merit. In

addition, counsel has demonstrated that she notified appellant of his right to review the record

and file a pro se response if he desired to do so. Appellant did not file a response. Neither did

the State favor us with a brief.

We have reviewed the arguable ground addressed by counsel to determine whether

there was any error which could plausibly support an appeal. We have also conducted an

independent review of the entire record. See Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75, 109 S.Ct. 346, 102

L.Ed.2d 300 (1988); Bledsoe v. State, 178 S.W.3d 824 (Tex.Cr.App. 2005). However, we have

found no reversible error and agree with counsel that the appeal is frivolous.

Accordingly, counsel's motion to withdraw is hereby granted, and the trial court’s

judgment is affirmed.

Patrick A. Pirtle

 Justice

Do not publish.
Exhibit 99.4







CONSENT OF L. MALMSTROM



I hereby consent to the use of my name in connection with the following document, which is being filed as an exhibit to and incorporated by reference into the registration statement on Form 40-F of Silver Wheaton Corp. (the Company) being filed with the United States Securities and Exchange Commission:



1.

The annual information form of the Company dated March 23, 2007, which includes reference to my name in connection with information relating to the Mineral Resources for the Zinkgruvan Mine.



March 23, 2007



/s/ L. Malmström

L. Malmström
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY HIGH

 18,704

 19,915

 19,958

 20,322

 19,754

 20,550

 21,003

 19,374

 12,366

 21,395

 21,033

 17,025

 21,541

 20,298

 20,441

 17,347

 20,898

 20,609

 20,382

 18,709

 20,425

 20,881

 21,035

 24,239

 17,778

 11,725

 8,395

 7,310

 8,061

 8,449

 8,812

 7,124

 7,506

 9,447

 9,342

 9,996

 10,152

 10,746

 9,177

 7,519

 8,863

 12,358

 9,734

 10,250

 10,062

 9,396

 10,948

 12,040

 11,141

 11,581

 12,053

 10,761

 12,134

 12,134

 11,923

 11,855

 7,175

 4,384

 2,274

 1,692

 1,703

 1,819

 13,865

 14,296

 15,223

 15,629

 15,854

 15,827

 16,445

 14,374

 10,240

 15,343

 15,416

 13,194

 14,904

 15,064

 13,324

 14,148

 16,716

 16,812

 16,097

 15,153

 15,342

 16,531

 16,176

 18,478

 14,740

 9,679

 6,872

 5,048

 4,891

 5,181

 5,187

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

OCTOBER 2021 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: January 27, 2022

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

PITTSBURG BOTTOM ON THE SACRAMENTO RIVER
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

DAY HIGH

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 4,136

 5,303

 5,439

 6,399

 6,633

 7,756

 9,559

 10,222

 11,821

 13,382

 12,697

 12,370

 9,557

 7,990

 7,968

 7,942

 7,488

 9,024

 8,985

 12,510

 10,527

 10,256

 12,001

 10,471

 11,589

 0

 0

 0

 0

 24

 591

 643

 887

 1,234

 1,070

 1,111

 1,275

 1,516

 1,806

 2,396

 2,359

 2,129

 1,946

 1,903

 1,855

 1,874

 2,324

 2,290

 2,730

 2,822

 2,255

 2,413

 2,439

 2,223

 2,348

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 1,821

 2,189

 2,505

 2,936

 2,849

 3,239

 3,995

 4,970

 5,669

 6,568

 6,791

 6,651

 5,552

 5,055

 4,794

 4,289

 4,188

 4,717

 6,332

 6,547

 5,782

 6,106

 6,175

 5,866

 6,022

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

JUNE 2018 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: July 16, 2018

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

PITTSBURG TOP ON THE SACRAMENTO RIVER
SCPR-19-0000825

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF HAWAI#I

IN RE PAMELA MACER, Petitioner.

ORIGINAL PROCEEDING

ORDER GRANTING PETITION TO RESIGN AND SURRENDER LICENSE

(By Recktenwald, C.J., Nakayama, McKenna, Pollack, and Wilson JJ.)

Upon consideration of Petitioner Pamela Macer’s

petition to resign and surrender her license to practice law in

the State of Hawai#i, filed pursuant to Rule 1.10 of the Rules of

the Supreme Court of the State of Hawai#i (RSCH), and the

affidavits submitted in support thereof, we conclude that

Petitioner Macer has fully complied with the requirements of RSCH

Rule 1.10. Therefore, 

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the petition is granted. 

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, pursuant to RSCH Rule 1.10(g),

that the Petitioner shall comply with the notice, affidavit, and

record requirements of RSCH Rules 2.16(a), (b), (d), and (g).

IT IS FINALLY ORDERED that the Clerk shall remove the

name of Petitioner Pamela Macer, attorney number 9127, from the

roll of attorneys of the State of Hawai#i, effective with the

filing of this order.

DATED: Honolulu, Hawai#i, December 17, 2019. 

/s/ Mark E. Recktenwald

/s/ Paula A. Nakayama

/s/ Sabrina S. McKenna 

/s/ Richard W. Pollack

/s/ Michael D. Wilson

Electronically Filed

Supreme Court

SCPR-19-0000825

17-DEC-2019

09:14 AM
May 2024

 STORAGE1000 ACRE-FEET COMPUTED* RELEASE - C.F.S. EVAPORATION PRECIP

DAY ELEV IN LAKE CHANGE INFLOW

C.F.S. POWER SPILL OUTLET C. F. S. INCHES INCHES

2,056.0

1 1,057.23 2,055.4 -0.7 2,076 2,318 0 0 98 0.27 0.00

2 1,057.17 2,054.7 -0.7 2,239 2,493 0 0 87 0.24 0.00

3 1,057.21 2,055.1 0.4 2,262 1,944 0 0 91 0.25 0.00

4 1,057.37 2,056.9 1.8 2,891 1,907 0 0 76 0.21 0.00

5 1,057.47 2,058.1 1.1 2,287 1,694 0 0 25 0.07 1.32

6 1,057.54 2,058.8 0.8 2,100 1,667 0 0 36 0.10 0.00

7 1,057.59 2,059.4 0.6 2,042 1,692 0 0 66 0.18 0.00

8 1,057.45 2,057.8 -1.6 1,996 2,250 0 450 91 0.25 0.00

9 1,057.34 2,056.6 -1.2 2,109 2,639 0 0 95 0.26 0.00

10 1,057.33 2,056.5 -0.1 2,649 2,633 0 0 73 0.20 0.00

11 1,057.52 2,058.6 2.1 3,211 2,012 0 0 120 0.33 0.00

12 1,057.87 2,062.6 3.9 3,572 1,473 0 0 113 0.31 0.00

13 1,058.20 2,066.3 3.7 3,898 1,911 0 0 110 0.30 0.00

TOTALS 10.1 33,332 26,633 0 450 1,081 2.97 1.32

ACRE-FEET 10,100 66,114 52,827 0 893 2,144

Comments: * COMPUTED INFLOW IS THE SUM OF CHANGE IN STORAGE, RELEASES, PUMPING AND EVAPORATION

Release (ACRE-FEET)

Power 52,827 Outlet 893

Spill 0 Total Releases 53,719

Precipitation

This month = 1.32

October 01, 2023 To date = 29.52

SUMMARY

Historical Archive and Report Database

New Melones Lake Daily Operations

Run Date: 5/14/2024
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY HIGH

 803

 785

 744

 698

 659

 614

 579

 583

 592

 620

 629

 665

 680

 676

 696

 712

 744

 714

 723

 775

 788

 779

 785

 819

 822

 802

 835

 772

 766

 751

 747

 375

 376

 379

 375

 372

 360

 364

 377

 377

 369

 370

 355

 350

 334

 330

 304

 309

 312

 302

 287

 303

 303

 310

 308

 298

 290

 281

 284

 280

 282

 277

 546

 537

 526

 507

 488

 471

 444

 457

 452

 456

 464

 476

 493

 485

 472

 466

 486

 449

 429

 463

 454

 435

 492

 485

 490

 498

 471

 454

 463

 513

 517

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

MARCH 2007 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: April 19, 2007

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

DELTA MENDOTA CANAL AT CHECK 13 (O'NEILL)
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY HIGH

 494

 312

 239

 228

 179

 171

 165

 159

 159

 162

 161

 167

 163

 165

 171

 172

 179

 179

 193

 180

 175

 186

 187

 184

 181

 188

 185

 199

 186

 220

 211

 246

 209

 186

 154

 149

 141

 134

 132

 139

 137

 120

 122

 130

 143

 139

 150

 144

 162

 161

 139

 137

 143

 146

 171

 172

 171

 177

 178

 173

 172

 162

 324

 245

 204

 181

 168

 158

 151

 149

 147

 146

 141

 142

 146

 152

 156

 162

 165

 170

 172

 166

 154

 165

 174

 177

 176

 179

 182

 184

 179

 187

 185

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

MARCH 2006 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: April 4, 2006

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

PITTSBURG BOTTOM ON THE SACRAMENTO RIVER
### §§3321 to 3325. Omitted

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Sections were omitted in the general amendment of the Elementary and Secondary Education Act of 1965, Pub. L. 89–10, by Pub. L. 103–382, title I, §101, Oct. 20, 1994, 108 Stat. 3519.

Section 3321, Pub. L. 89–10, title VII, §7041, as added Pub. L. 100–297, title I, §1001, Apr. 28, 1988, 102 Stat. 289, related to use of funds for training and technical assistance.

Section 3322, Pub. L. 89–10, title VII, §7042, as added Pub. L. 100–297, title I, §1001, Apr. 28, 1988, 102 Stat. 290, related to multifunctional resource centers.

Section 3323, Pub. L. 89–10, title VII, §7043, as added Pub. L. 100–297, title I, §1001, Apr. 28, 1988, 102 Stat. 291, related to fellowships.

Section 3324, Pub. L. 89–10, title VII, §7044, as added Pub. L. 100–297, title I, §1001, Apr. 28, 1988, 102 Stat. 291, related to priorities in making grants and contracts.

Section 3325, Pub. L. 89–10, title VII, §7045, as added Pub. L. 100–297, title I, §1001, Apr. 28, 1988, 102 Stat. 291, related to stipends.
§ 10.315 Will OWCP pay for transportation to obtain medical treatment? ( a ) The employee is entitled to reimbursement of reasonable and necessary expenses, including transportation needed to obtain authorized medical services, appliances or supplies. To determine what is a reasonable distance to travel, OWCP will consider the availability of services, the employee's condition, and the means of transportation. Generally, a roundtrip distance of up to 100 miles is considered a reasonable distance to travel. Travel should be undertaken by the shortest route, and if practical, by public conveyance. If the medical evidence shows that the employee is unable to use these means of transportation, OWCP may authorize travel by taxi or special conveyance.
( b ) For non-emergency medical treatment, if roundtrip travel of more than 100 miles is contemplated, or air transportation or overnight accommodations will be needed, the employee must submit a written request to OWCP for prior authorization with information describing the circumstances and necessity for such travel expenses. OWCP will approve the request if it determines that the travel expenses are reasonable and necessary, and are incident to obtaining authorized medical services, appliances or supplies. Requests for travel expenses that are often approved include those resulting from referrals to a specialist for further medical treatment, and those involving air transportation of an employee who lives in a remote geographical area with limited local medical services.
( c ) If a claimant disagrees with the decision of OWCP that requested travel expenses are either not reasonable or necessary, or are not incident to obtaining authorized medical services or supplies, he or she may utilize the appeals process described in subpart G of this part.
( d ) The standard form designated for medical travel refund requests is Form OWCP-957 and must be used to seek reimbursement under this section. This form can be obtained from OWCP.
* Pursuant to Local Rule 47.5, the court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in Local Rule 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

_____________________
No. 96-10277 Summary Calendar

_____________________

WILLIAM EVERETT DEAN,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus

JIM BOWLES, Sheriff; B. KNOWLS, Chief; M. HOOKS; DALLAS COUNTY SHERIFF’S DEPARTMENT,

Defendants-Appellee.

_________________________________________________________________ Appeal from the United States District Court for the

Northern District of Texas USDC No. 3:96-CV-35-P

_________________________________________________________________ July 26, 1996

Before GARWOOD, JOLLY and DENNIS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: *

William Dean, Texas priso ner # 95095745, has appealed the

dismissal of his civil rights action alleging the denial of his

right of access to the courts. Because the district court did not

abuse its discretion by so ruling, its judgment is AFFIRMED. See

Lewis v. Casey , ___ U.S. ___ (June 24, 1996) 1996 WL 340797 *4-5.

The dismissal without service of process on the defendants was not-2-

plain error. S ee Robertson v. Plano City of Texas , 70 F.3d 21, 23

(5th Cir. 1995).

JUDGMENT AFFIRMED.
#### § 404.1706 Notification of options for obtaining attorney representation.

If you are not represented by an attorney and we make a determination or decision that is subject to the administrative review process provided under subpart J of this part and it does not grant all of the benefits or other relief you requested or it adversely affects any entitlement to benefits that we have established or may establish for you, we will include with the notice of that determination or decision information about your options for obtaining an attorney to represent you in dealing with us. We will also tell you that a legal services organization may provide you with legal representation free of charge if you satisfy the qualifying requirements applicable to that organization.

[58 FR 64886, Dec. 10, 1993]
### subpart ix—utilization of democratic institutions in development
§ 30.307 Can one recommended decision address the entitlement of multiple claimants? ( a ) When multiple individuals have filed survivor claims under Part B and/or Part E of EEOICPA relating to the same deceased employee, the entitlement of all of those individuals shall be determined in the same recommended decision, except as described in paragraph (b) of this section.
( b ) If another individual subsequently files a survivor claim for the same award, the recommended decision on that claim will not address the entitlement of the earlier claimants if the district office recommended that the later survivor claim be denied.
[84 FR 3050, Feb. 8, 2019]
March 2023

STORAGE COMPUTED* SPRING SHASTA EVAP

ACRE-FEET INFLOW CR. P. P. RELEASE RELEASE - C.F.S. C. F. S.

DAY ELEV RES. CHANGE C.F.S. RELEASE C. F. S. POWER SPILL FISHTRAP (1)

22,639

1 584.85 22,414 -225 3,227 325 2,234 3,325 0 0 15

2 584.39 22,131 -283 3,182 465 2,114 3,324 0 0 1

3 582.05 20,716 -1,415 2,607 766 1,287 3,318 0 0 2

4 581.35 20,305 -411 3,113 285 2,215 3,319 0 0 1

5 580.99 20,094 -211 3,220 37 2,614 3,326 0 0 0

6 581.03 20,118 24 3,342 289 2,394 3,330 0 0 0

7 582.55 21,014 896 3,773 319 2,714 3,321 0 0 0

8 582.88 21,211 197 3,420 338 2,354 3,321 0 0 0

9 582.60 21,044 -167 3,245 658 1,855 3,329 0 0 0

10 582.28 20,853 -191 3,227 1,683 484 3,323 0 0 0

11 582.62 21,056 203 3,425 1,641 944 3,323 0 0 0

12 580.90 20,042 -1,014 2,810 314 1,687 3,321 0 0 0

13 583.24 21,429 1,387 4,019 337 1,982 3,319 0 0 1

14 585.74 22,972 1,543 4,875 1,345 179 4,097 0 0 0

15 583.29 21,459 -1,513 4,095 1,141 1,306 4,858 0 0 0

16 583.11 21,350 -109 4,595 1,703 1,498 4,648 0 0 2

17 582.83 21,182 -168 4,362 1,673 1,629 4,444 0 0 3

18 583.88 21,817 635 4,563 1,717 2,034 4,241 0 0 2

19 585.60 22,884 1,067 4,580 1,723 1,658 4,042 0 0 0

20 584.61 22,266 -618 3,624 1,700 837 3,936 0 0 0

21 585.08 22,557 291 3,968 1,696 1,398 3,819 0 0 2

22 583.54 21,611 -946 3,253 1,687 807 3,730 0 0 0

23 583.39 21,520 -91 3,588 1,681 1,258 3,634 0 0 0

24 583.42 21,538 18 3,536 660 2,100 3,525 0 0 2

25 582.96 21,259 -279 3,282 906 1,734 3,422 0 0 1

26 582.41 20,931 -328 3,158 323 2,202 3,322 0 0 1

27 581.50 20,393 -538 3,047 322 2,109 3,316 0 0 2

28 581.52 20,405 12 3,329 238 2,343 3,323 0 0 0

29 581.91 20,633 228 3,435 467 1,951 3,320 0 0 0

30 581.93 20,645 12 3,330 491 1,947 3,323 0 0 1

31 581.85 20,598 -47 3,289 449 2,029 3,312 0 0 1

TOTALS -2,041 110,519 27,379 53,897 111,511 0 0 37

ACRE-FEET -2,041 219,214 54,306 106,905 221,182 0 0 73

*COMPUTED INFLOW IS SUM OF CHANGE IN STORAGE, RELEASES, AND EVAPORATION.

(1) EVAPORATION RECORDS TAKEN FROM SHASTA PAN.

SUMMARY

Release (ACRE-FEET)

Power 221,182

Spill 0

Historical Archive and Report Database

Keswick Reservoir Daily Operations

Run Date: 4/1/2023
Fish Trap 0

Historical Archive and Report Database

Keswick Reservoir Daily Operations

Run Date: 4/1/2023
§ 234.45 Payment to the employee's estate. ( a ) *When the employee's estate is paid.* If no designated beneficiaries or relatives survive the employee when the RLS becomes payable, the employee's estate may be paid the RLS. Employees may also designate their estates to receive all or a share of the RLS as beneficiaries.
( b ) *How the employee's estate is paid.* If a legal representative of the employee's estate has been appointed and has not been discharged, the Board will pay the RLS to the legal representative. When no legal representative of the employee's estate has been or is expected to be appointed, or the estate of the deceased employee has been closed and reopening is not expected, the Board will pay the RLS according to state statutory procedures applicable when no formal probate or administration occurs.
#### Miguel Flores GONZALEZ; et al., Petitioners, v. Alberto R. GONZALES, Attorney General, Respondent.

No. 06-70420.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

July 21, 2006.*

Miguel Flores Gonzalez, Westminister, CA, pro se.

Susana Flores, Westminister, CA, pro se.

Nancy Aidee Figueroa Hernandez, Westminister, CA, pro se.

Joyce Edith Figueroa Hernandez, West-minister, CA, pro se.

CAC-District Counsel, Esq., Department of Homeland Security, Los Angeles, CA, Ronald E. LeFevre, Chief Counsel, Department of Homeland Security, San Francisco, CA, Joan E. Smiley, Esq., Richard M. Evans, Esq., Washington, DC, for Respondent.

Before: B. FLETCHER, HAWKINS and THOMAS, Circuit Judges.

*

 This panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. *See*Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

MEMORANDUM **

Respondent’s unopposed motion for summary disposition is granted because the questions raised by this petition for review are so insubstantial as not to require further argument. *See*8 C.F.R. § 1003.2(c)(2) (establishing time and numerical limits for motions to reopen); *see also United States v. Hooton,*693 F.2d 857, 858 (9th Cir.1982) (per curiam) (stating standard). Accordingly, this petition for review is denied.

All other pending motions are denied as moot. The temporary stay of removal confirmed by Ninth Circuit General Order 6.4(c) shall continue in effect until issuance of the mandate. The motion for stay of voluntary departure, filed after the departure period had expired, is denied. *See Garcia v. Ashcroft,*368 F.3d 1157 (9th Cir.2004).

PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED.

**

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by 9 th Cir. R. 36-3.