alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
### §3402. Congressional declaration of purpose

The Congress declares that the establishment of a Department of Education is in the public interest, will promote the general welfare of the United States, will help ensure that education issues receive proper treatment at the Federal level, and will enable the Federal Government to coordinate its education activities more effectively. Therefore, the purposes of this chapter are—

(1) to strengthen the Federal commitment to ensuring access to equal educational opportunity for every individual;

(2) to supplement and complement the efforts of States, the local school systems and other instrumentalities of the States, the private sector, public and private educational institutions, public and private nonprofit educational research institutions, community-based organizations, parents, and students to improve the quality of education;

(3) to encourage the increased involvement of the public, parents, and students in Federal education programs;

(4) to promote improvements in the quality and usefulness of education through federally supported research, evaluation, and sharing of information;

(5) to improve the coordination of Federal education programs;

(6) to improve the management and efficiency of Federal education activities, especially with respect to the process, procedures, and administrative structures for the dispersal of Federal funds, as well as the reduction of unnecessary and duplicative burdens and constraints, including unnecessary paperwork, on the recipients of Federal funds; and

(7) to increase the accountability of Federal education programs to the President, the Congress, and the public.

(Pub. L. 96–88, title I, §102, Oct. 17, 1979, 93 Stat. 670.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

This chapter, referred to in text, was in the original "this Act", meaning Pub. L. 96–88, Oct. 17, 1979, 93 Stat. 668, known as the Department of Education Organization Act, which enacted this chapter, amended sections 928, former 929, 1102, 2390, 2711, and 3012 of this title, section 19 of Title 3, The President, sections 101, 5312, and 5314 to 5316 of Title 5, Government Organization and Employees, sections 2, 9, and 11 of the Inspector General Act of 1978, formerly set out in the Appendix to Title 5 (see 5 U.S.C. 402, 422, 424), section 1004 of Title 21, Food and Drugs, and sections 761b, 794c, 821, 829, 873, 879, 882, 914, and 952 of Title 29, Labor, and enacted provisions set out as notes under sections 1102 and 3401 of this title. For complete classification of this Act to the Code, see Short Title note set out under section 3401 of this title and Tables.
EXHIBIT 11
                              BellSouth Corporation
                        Computation of Earnings Per Share

                                  For the Three Month Period Ended
                                           September 30,
                                      1999                1998
Basic Earnings Per Common Share:

Net Income                      $  1,015                 $   814
Weighted average shares
Outstanding                        1,885                   1,965
Earnings Per Common Share       $    .54                 $   .41



                                  For the Nine Month Period Ended
                                           September 30,
                                     1999              1998
Basic Earnings Per Common Share:

Net Income                        $ 2,610             $ 2,524
Weighted average shares
Outstanding                         1,903               1,975
Earnings Per Common Share        $   1.37            $   1.28


<PAGE>


                                   EXHIBIT 11
                              BellSouth Corporation
                  Computation of Earnings Per Share (continued)

                               For the Three Month Period Ended
                                         September 30,
                                     1999                1998
Diluted Earnings Per Common Share:

Net Income                       $   1,015            $   814

Weighted average shares
Outstanding                          1,885              1,965

Incremental shares from
Assumed exercise of
stock options and payment of
performance share awards                19                 14

Total Shares                         1,904              1,979

Earnings Per Common Share          $   .53            $   .41




                                    For the Nine Month Period Ended
                                             September 30,
                                        1999                1998
Diluted Earnings Per Common Share:

Net Income                           $ 2,610             $ 2,524

Weighted average shares
Outstanding                            1,903               1,975

Incremental shares from
Assumed exercise of
stock options and payment of
performance share awards                  18                  12

Total Shares                           1,921               1,987

Earnings Per Common Share           $   1.36             $  1.27
#### § 1002.20 Does USERRA protect an individual who does not actually perform service in the uniformed services?

Yes. Employers are prohibited from taking actions against an individual for any of the activities protected by the Act, whether or not he or she has performed service in the uniformed services.
<PAGE>   1


                                                                   EXHIBIT 23.1




                    [COOPERS & LYBRAND L.L.P. LETTERHEAD]















CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT CERTIFIED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the registration statement of
Phoenix Information Systems Corp. on Form S-8 related to the Consulting and
Services Compensation Agreement, as amended, of our report dated May 30, 1996,
on our audits of the consolidated financial statements of Phoenix Information
Systems Corp. and subsidiaries as of March 31, 1996 and 1995 and for the years
ended March 31, 1996 and 1995 and cumulative for the period from April 1, 1991,
through March 31, 1996, which report is included in the annual report on Form
10-K. 



Tampa, Florida
July 10, 1997
MEMORANDUM OPINION

No. 04-10-00754-CV

IN RE Trust Created Under the Last Will and Testament of Leslie Duncan MAURER

From the Probate Court No. 1, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2009-PC-3521

Honorable Polly Jackson Spencer, Judge Presiding

PER CURIAM

Sitting: Karen Angelini, Justice

Sandee Bryan Marion, Justice

Phylis J. Speedlin, Justice

Delivered and Filed: December 29, 2010

DISMISSED FOR LACK OF JURISDICTION

On July 6, 2010, the trial court signed a final judgment in this case. On July 23, 2010, 

appellant filed a timely request for findings of fact and conclusions of law. Therefore, the notice 

of appeal was due to be filed on October 4, 2010. See Tex. R. App. P. 26.1(a). And, a motion for 

extension of time to file the notice of appeal was due on October 19, 2010. See Tex. R. App. P. 

26.3. However, appellant did not file its notice of appeal until October 20, 2010. Similarly, 

appellant did not file a motion for extension of time until October 20, 2010.1

 1 In its motion to extend time, appellant clearly states that the notice of appeal and the motion to extend time were 

filed on October 20, 2010. Likewise, the certificate of service on both the notice of appeal and motion to extend time 

indicate that the notice of appeal and motion to extend time were forwarded to opposing counsel on October 20, 

2010.
04-10-00754-CV

- 2 -

A motion for extension of time is necessarily implied when an appellant, acting in good 

faith, files a notice of appeal beyond the time allowed by Rule 26.1 but within the fifteen-day 

grace period provided by Rule 26.3 for filing a motion for extension of time. See Verburgt v. 

Dorner, 959 S.W.2d 615, 617 (Tex.1997) (construing the predecessor to Rule 26). But “once the 

period for granting a motion for extension of time under Rule [26.3] has passed, a party can no 

longer invoke the appellate court=s jurisdiction.” Id.

Because appellant’s motion to extend time to file its notice of appeal was untimely filed, 

we denied appellant’s motion to extend time to file its notice of appeal on November 10, 2010. 

And, because appellant’s notice of appeal was filed late and was not filed within the fifteen-day 

grace period provided by Rule 26.3, we ordered appellant to show cause in writing by November 

29, 2010 why this appeal should not be dismissed for lack of jurisdiction. Appellant did not 

respond. Therefore, we dismiss this appeal for lack of jurisdiction.

PER CURIAM
Historical Archive and Report Database

Annual Power System Generation Summary

Calendar Year 2022 : 01/01/2022- 12/31/2022 Run Date: 11/17/2022

Shasta

Gross Gen. 585,157 MWH

Sta. Serv. 2,689 MWH

Net Gen. 582,468 MWH

Trinity

LN Gen. 2,160 MWH

TR Gen. 122,626 MWH

Gross Gen. 124,786 MWH

Sta. Serv. 932 MWH

Net Gen 123,854 MWH

JF Carr

Gross Gen. 105,760 MWH

Sta. Serv. 83 MWH

Net Gen. 105,677 MWH

Spring Creek

Gross Gen. 31,081 MWH

Sta. Serv. 487 MWH

Net Gen. 30,594 MWH

Folsom

Gross Gen. 367,732 MWH

Sta. Serv. 4,790 MWH

Net Gen. 362,942 MWH

O'Neill

Gross Gen. 1,490 MWH

Net Gen. 675 MWH

Federal Share of San Luis

Out Meter 36,768 MWH

Total Gross

Generation 1,633,261 MWH

With Federal Share of San Luis 1,670,029 MWH

Total Net

Generation 1,742,796 MWH

With Federal Share of San Luis 1,779,564 MWH

Stampede (Washoe Project)

Gross Gen. 5,847 MWH

Sta. Serv. 238 MWH

Net Gen. 5,609 MWH

Nimbus

Gross Gen. 38,714 MWH

Sta. Serv. 146 MWH

Net Gen. 38,568 MWH

New Melones

Gross Gen. 252,430 MWH

Sta. Serv. 1,208 MWH

Net Gen. 251,222 MWH

Keswick

Gross Gen. 126,111 MWH

Sta. Serv. 1,009 MWH

Net Gen. 125,102 MWH
Historical Archive and Report Database

Annual Power System Generation Summary

Water Year 2022 : 10/01/2021- 09/31/2022 Run Date: 11/17/2022

Shasta

Gross Gen. 765,003 MWH

Sta. Serv. 3,974 MWH

Net Gen. 582,468 MWH

Trinity

LN Gen. 2,698 MWH

TR Gen. 154,994 MWH

Gross Gen. 157,692 MWH

Sta. Serv. 1,266 MWH

Net Gen 156,426 MWH

JF Carr

Gross Gen. 147,902 MWH

Sta. Serv. 112 MWH

Net Gen. 147,790 MWH

Spring Creek

Gross Gen. 82,368 MWH

Sta. Serv. 807 MWH

Net Gen. 81,561 MWH

Folsom

Gross Gen. 386,885 MWH

Sta. Serv. 6,666 MWH

Net Gen. 380,219 MWH

O'Neill

Gross Gen. 2,096 MWH

Net Gen. 945 MWH

Federal Share of San Luis

Out Meter 38,722 MWH

Total Gross

Generation 2,029,982 MWH

With Federal Share of San Luis 2,068,704 MWH

Total Net

Generation 2,166,562 MWH

With Federal Share of San Luis 2,205,284 MWH

Stampede (Washoe Project)

Gross Gen. 6,422 MWH

Sta. Serv. 284 MWH

Net Gen. 6,138 MWH

Nimbus

Gross Gen. 39,572 MWH

Sta. Serv. 151 MWH

Net Gen. 39,421 MWH

New Melones

Gross Gen. 270,129 MWH

Sta. Serv. 1,596 MWH

Net Gen. 268,533 MWH

Keswick

Gross Gen. 178,335 MWH

Sta. Serv. 1,425 MWH

Net Gen. 176,910 MWH
Editorial Note on Part 22
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 22 appear by T.D. ATF-435, 66 FR 5476, Jan. 19, 2001 and T.D. ATF-463 and T.D. ATF-462, 66 FR 42733, 42736, Aug. 15, 2001.

§ 22.165 Photographic copies of records. ( a ) *General.* Permittees may record, copy, or reproduce required records. Any process may be used which accurately reproduces the original record, and which forms a durable medium for reproducing and preserving the original record.
( b ) *Copies of records treated as original records.* Whenever records are reproduced under this section, the reproduced records shall be preserved in conveniently accessible files, and provisions shall be made for examining, viewing, and using the reproduced records the same as if they were the original record, and they shall be treated and considered for all purposes as though they were the original record. All provisions of law and regulations applicable to the original are applicable to the reproduced record. As used in this section, “original record” means the record required by this part to be maintained or preserved by the permittee, even though it may be an executed duplicate or other copy of the document.
(Sec. 201, Pub. L. 85-859, 72 Stat. 1395, as amended (26 U.S.C. 5555))
(No. 73-CC-468

#### John E. Mulholland, Jr., Claimant, *vs.*State of Illinois, Department of Business and Economic Development, Respondent.

*Opinion filed September 20, 1973.*

John E. Mulholland, Jr., Claimant, pro se.

William J. Scott, Attorney General; William E. Webber, Assistant Attorney General, for Respondent.

Per Curiam.
§ 771.121 Review by Director. ( a ) *Modification or reversal.* On appeal, the Director shall afford a reasonable opportunity for the submission of proposed findings, conclusions, or exceptions with reasons in support thereof and an opportunity for oral argument. The Director may alter or modify any finding of the administrative law judge (or of the Director of Industry Operations as the case may be) and may affirm, reverse, or modify the recommended decision of the administrative law judge, or the initial decision of the Director of Industry Operations, or may remand the case for further hearing, but shall not consider evidence that is not a part of the record.
( b ) *Affirmance.* Except in the case of a remand, when, on appeal, the Director affirms the initial decision of the Director of Industry Operations or the recommended decision of the administrative law judge, as the case may be, such decision shall be the agency's final decision.
( c ) *Recusal.* Appeals and petitions for review shall not be decided by the Director in any proceeding in which the Director has engaged in an investigation or prosecution and in such event the Director shall so state his disqualification in writing and refer the record to the Deputy Director for appropriate action. The Deputy Director may designate an Assistant Director or one of the Deputy Director's principal aides to consider any proceeding instead of the Director. The original copy of the decision on review shall be placed in the official record of the proceeding, a signed duplicate original shall be served upon the applicant, licensee, or permittee, and a copy shall be transmitted to the Director of Industry Operations.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY HIGH

 20,699

 19,743

 19,192

 20,288

 22,033

 23,424

 22,896

 22,505

 22,810

 23,644

 22,927

 20,719

 21,311

 24,369

 22,573

 25,347

 24,810

 24,330

 23,803

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 16,090

 17,434

 17,257

 11,719

 11,171

 9,214

 9,758

 10,178

 10,363

 10,090

 9,705

 10,308

 9,843

 10,956

 10,959

 10,190

 10,649

 11,905

 13,888

 15,672

 14,436

 12,435

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 5,862

 6,252

 6,684

 16,817

 15,431

 14,108

 14,598

 15,887

 16,946

 17,098

 16,604

 16,732

 17,641

 17,779

 16,856

 16,455

 18,731

 18,755

 19,927

 20,029

 18,940

 18,182

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 10,951

 11,513

 11,138

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

DECEMBER 2018 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: January 3, 2019

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

PORT CHICAGO BOTTOM IN SUISUN BAY
§ 220.56 Securing medical evidence at the hearings officer hearing level. ( a ) Where there is a conflict in the medical evidence at the hearing level of review before a hearings officer, the hearings officer will try to resolve it by comparing the persuasiveness and value of the conflicting evidence. The hearings officer's reasoning will be explained in the decision rationale. Where such resolution is not possible, the hearings officer will secure additional medical evidence (e.g., clinical findings, laboratory test, diagnosis, prognosis, etc.) to resolve the conflict. Even in the absence of a conflict, the hearings officer will also secure additional medical evidence when the file does not contain findings, laboratory tests, a diagnosis, or a prognosis necessary for a decision.
( b ) Before requesting a consultative examination, the hearings officer will ascertain whether the information is available as a result of a recent examination by any of the claimant's medical sources. If it is, the hearings officer will request the evidence from that medical practitioner. If contact with the medical source is not productive for any reason, or if there is no recent examination by a medical source, the hearings officer will obtain a consultative examination.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY HIGH

 836

 780

 768

 806

 858

 954

 894

 836

 859

 929

 917

 901

 939

 952

 935

 861

 872

 884

 916

 946

 930

 845

 755

 797

 893

 824

 815

 915

 959

 911

 929

 631

 628

 613

 632

 635

 632

 637

 619

 613

 629

 631

 648

 641

 650

 666

 655

 676

 663

 641

 653

 635

 622

 640

 660

 689

 674

 680

 679

 659

 661

 700

 730

 700

 703

 736

 768

 790

 739

 691

 711

 750

 751

 742

 765

 797

 800

 770

 780

 762

 778

 789

 747

 708

 677

 714

 762

 739

 726

 753

 761

 775

 813

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

DECEMBER 2013 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: February 21, 2014

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

DELTA MENDOTA CANAL AT CHECK 13 (O'NEILL)
#### § 1002.1 What is the purpose of this part?

This part implements the Uniformed Services Employment and Reemployment Rights Act of 1994 (“USERRA” or “the Act”). 38 U.S.C. 4301-4334. USERRA is a law that establishes certain rights and benefits for employees, and duties for employers. USERRA affects employment, reemployment, and retention in employment, when employees serve or have served in the uniformed services. There are five subparts to these regulations. Subpart A gives an introduction to the USERRA regulations. Subpart B describes USERRA's anti-discrimination and anti-retaliation provisions. Subpart C explains the steps that must be taken by a uniformed service member who wants to return to his or her previous civilian employment. Subpart D describes the rights, benefits, and obligations of persons absent from employment due to service in the uniformed services, including rights and obligations related to health plan coverage. Subpart E describes the rights, benefits, and obligations of the returning veteran or service member. Subpart F explains the role of the Department of Labor in enforcing and giving assistance under USERRA. These regulations implement USERRA as it applies to States, local governments, and private employers. Separate regulations published by the Federal Office of Personnel Management implement USERRA for Federal executive agency employers and employees.
#### § 30.912 Can a covered Part E employee receive benefits for additional impairment following an award of such benefits by OWCP?

A covered Part E employee previously awarded impairment benefits by OWCP may file a claim for additional impairment benefits. Such claim must be based on an increase in the impairment rating that is the result of the covered illness or illnesses from the impairment rating that formed the basis for the last award of such benefits by OWCP. OWCP will only adjudicate claims for such an increased rating that are filed at least two years from the date of the last award of impairment benefits. However, OWCP will not wait two years before it will adjudicate a claim for additional impairment that is based on an allegation that the employee sustained a new covered illness.
§ 229.50 Age reduction in employee or spouse benefit. ( a ) *When age reduction applies.* The employee overall minimum benefit is reduced for each month the employee is under retirement age on the date the employee becomes eligible for an increase under the overall minimum, as shown in § 229.22 of this part, unless the employee has a period of disability and § 229.52 of this part does not apply, in which case no age reduction is applied. The spouse overall minimum benefit is reduced for each month a spouse, who is not a spouse with the employee's child under 16 years old or disabled before attaining age 22 in his or her care, is under retirement age on the date the spouse is eligible for an increase under the overall minimum (see § 229.21 of this part). If a spouse's overall minimum benefit is reduced for age and he or she later begins caring for an eligible child, no age reduction will apply for the months the child is in his or her care.
( b ) *Employee age reduction.* The Overall Minimum PIA plus any delayed retirement credits is reduced by 1 ⁄ 180 for each month the employee is under retirement age on the date the employee becomes eligible for the overall minimum. When the PIA amount is increased, the amount of the increase is reduced by 1 ⁄ 180 for the same number of months used to determine the initial age reduction.
( c ) *Spouse age reduction.* The amount of the spouse overall minimum benefit, after any adjustment for the family maximum, is reduced by 1 ⁄ 144 for each month the spouse is under retirement age on the date when he or she becomes eligible under the overall minimum. When the spouse benefit increases, the amount of the increase is reduced by 1 ⁄ 144 for the same number of months used to compute the initial age reduction.
( d ) *Age reduction after 1999.* Beginning in the year 2000 the amount of age reduction shall be as specified in paragraphs (b) and (c) of this section for the first 36 months of the reduction period, as defined in paragraph (e) of this section, and 1 ⁄ 240 for any additional months included in such period.
( e ) *Reduction period defined.* The reduction period is the number of months beginning with the first month for which the O/M is payable and ending with the month before the month the beneficiary attains retirement age.
§ 227.3 Reduction for railroad retirement family maximum. If the railroad retirement family maximum applies, and the reduction amount is higher than the spouse tier II rate, as shown in part 226 of this chapter, the initial supplemental annuity rate from § 227.2 is reduced by the smaller of— ( a ) The difference between the total railroad retirement maximum reduction amount and the reduction in the spouse annuity; or
( b ) The total supplemental annuity rate from § 227.2.
[50 FR 11502, Mar. 22, 1985, as amended at 54 FR 12903, Mar. 29, 1989]
§ 228.52 Restored amount. ( a ) *General.* A restored amount is added to the tier II annuity component of a widow(er)'s annuity whose annuity is reduced for receipt of an employee annuity under the Railroad Retirement Act provided either the employee or the widow(er) had ten years of creditable railroad service prior to January 1, 1975.
( b ) *Amount.* The amount of the tier II restored amount for a widow(er) is the difference between the amount payable as a widow(er) under the Railroad Retirement Act of 1937 as increased by all annual social security cost-of-living percentage increases from January 1, 1975, until the later of the annuity beginning date of either the employee's annuity or the widow(er)'s annuity and the amount payable to the widow(er) under the Railroad Retirement Act of 1974 under the rules set forth in this part.
( c ) *Widower.* In order to qualify for an annuity under the 1937 Act and thus for a restored amount, a widower must have been dependent on his spouse for at least 50 percent of his support in the year prior to her death or at the time the spouse's annuity began.