alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Electrical Conductivity, UMHOS

Day High Low Mean

1 0 0 0

2 0 0 0

3 0 0 0

4 0 0 0

5 0 0 0

6 0 0 0

7 0 0 0

8 0 0 0

9 0 0 0

10 0 0 0

11 0 0 0

12 0 0 0

13 0 0 0

14 0 0 0

15 0 0 0

16 0 0 0

17 0 0 0

18 0 0 0

19 0 0 0

20 0 0 0

21 0 0 0

22 0 0 0

23 0 0 0

24 0 0 0

25 0 0 0

26 0 0 0

27 0 0 0

28 0 0 0

29 0 0 0

30 0 0 0

COMMENT(S): 0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

Historical Archive and Report Database

Pittsburg Bottom On The Sacramento River

Run Date: 5/2/2024

April 2024
No. 11,845.

#### Miller *v.*Maxwell.

Decided November 28, 1927.

Rehearing denied December 12, 1927.

Action on bank check. Judgment for defendant.

*Affirmed.*

3. Bills and *Notes*— Bank *Check*— Conditional. In an action on a bank check which was given under the condition that drawer “made collections to pay it,” the condition not being fulfilled, judgment was properly given for defendant.

*Error to the County Court of the. City and County of*Denver, *Eon. E. J.*Ingram, *Judge.*

Mr. Charles Rosenbaum, for plaintiff in error.

Mr. A. Newton Patton, for defendant in error.

*Department One.*

Mr. Justice Denison

delivered the opinion of the court.

Miller had judgment against Maxwell on a dishonored check before justice of the peace. On appeal both sides moved for a directed verdict and the court directed for the defendant. The plaintiff brings error.

- The evidence shows that Miller was mortgagee of an apartment house, Maxwell was the agent of the owner and mortgagor. Maxwell gave Miller’s agents the check in question which they credited on account of interest on the mortgage note and when it was dishonored Miller brought this action.

There was evidence which some circumstances tended to corroborate, that when Maxwell left the check with Miller’s agents he said it was left in payment of interest *541upon the obligation to Miller “provided I made the collections to pay it, ’ ’ and that he never was able to make the collections. If the court believed this the judgment was right. C. L. § 3833; *Sayre v. Leonard,*57 Colo. 118, 140 Pac. 196.

Judgment affirmed.

Me. Chiee Justice Burke, Mr. Justice Whiteord and Mr. Justice Sheaeor concur.
#### § 404.102 Definitions.

For the purpose of this subpart—

*Act* means the Social Security Act, as amended.

*Age* means how many years old you are. You reach a particular age on the day before your birthday. For example, if your sixty-second birthday is on July 1, 1979, you became age 62 on June 30, 1979.

*Quarter* or *calendar quarter* means a period of three calendar months ending March 31, June 30, September 30, or December 31 of any year.

*We, our,* or *us* means the Social Security Administration.

*You* or *your* means the worker whose insured status is being considered.
§ 5.156 Distilled spirits specialty products. ( a ) *General.* Distilled spirits that do not meet one of the other standards of identity specified in this subpart are distilled spirits specialty products and must be designated in accordance with trade and consumer understanding, or, if no such understanding exists, with a distinctive or fanciful name (which may be the name of a cocktail) appearing in the same field of vision as a statement of composition. The statement of composition and the distinctive or fanciful name serve as the class and type designation for these products. The statement of composition must follow the rules found in § 5.166. A product may not bear a designation which indicates it contains a class or type of distilled spirits unless the distilled spirits therein conform to such class and type.
( b ) *Products designated in accordance with trade and consumer understanding.* Products may be designated in accordance with trade and consumer understanding without a statement of composition if the appropriate TTB officer has determined that there is such understanding.
#### § 771.122 Denial of renewal or revocation.

If the Director orders the denial of an application, a copy of the application marked “Disapproved” will be returned to the applicant by the Director of Industry Operations. If the Director orders a revocation of a license of permit, any stay of revocation will be withdrawn and the revocation will become effective upon the order of the Director of Industry Operations. After the issuance of a denial of a renewal application or a revocation, and pending the final determination of a timely appeal, the licensee or permittee may continue operations, if at all, pursuant to § 555.83 of this chapter.
Document headings vary by document type but may contain
                    the following: the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document
the number of the CFR title and the number of each part
                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly
                      related to
the agency docket number / agency internal file number
the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in
                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory
                      Actions See the
                    Document Drafting Handbook
                    for more details.
 Department of Justice Drug Enforcement Administration
 By Notice dated October 8, 2010, and published in the 
                    **Federal Register**
                     on October 20, 2010, (75 FR 64744), Cayman Chemical Company, 1180 East Ellsworth Road, Ann Arbor, Michigan 48108, made application by renewal to the Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA) to be registered as a bulk manufacturer of the following basic classes of controlled substances: Drug
ScheduleMarihuana (7360)
ITetrahydrocannabinols (7370)
I
 The company plans to manufacture small quantities of marihuana derivatives for research purposes. In reference to drug code 7360 (Marihuana), the company plans to bulk manufacture cannabidiol. In reference to drug code 7370 (Tetrahydrocannabinols), the company will manufacture a synthetic THC. No other activity for this drug code is authorized for this registration. No comments or objections have been received. DEA has considered the factors in 21 U.S.C. 823(a) and determined that the registration of Cayman Chemical Company to manufacture the listed basic classes of controlled substances is consistent with the public interest at this time. DEA has investigated Cayman Chemical Company to ensure that the company's registration is consistent with the public interest. The investigation has included inspection and testing of the company's physical security systems, verification of the company's compliance with state and local laws, and a review of the company's background and history. Therefore, pursuant to 21 U.S.C. 823, and in accordance with 21 CFR 1301.33, the above named company is granted registration as a bulk manufacturer of the basic classes of controlled substances listed. Dated: April 11, 2011. Joseph T. Rannazzisi, Deputy Assistant Administrator, Office of Diversion Control, Drug Enforcement Administration.


[FR Doc. 2011-9360 Filed 4-18-11; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 4410-09-P
Exhibit 13.2
 906 CERTIFICATION
 
       By:
    
    /s/ Peck Joo Tan

Peck Joo TanChief Financial Officer
### §343–2. Dietary supplement labeling exemptions

#### (a) In general

A publication, including an article, a chapter in a book, or an official abstract of a peer-reviewed scientific publication that appears in an article and was prepared by the author or the editors of the publication, which is reprinted in its entirety, shall not be defined as labeling when used in connection with the sale of a dietary supplement to consumers when it—

(1) is not false or misleading;

(2) does not promote a particular manufacturer or brand of a dietary supplement;

(3) is displayed or presented, or is displayed or presented with other such items on the same subject matter, so as to present a balanced view of the available scientific information on a dietary supplement;

(4) if displayed in an establishment, is physically separate from the dietary supplements; and

(5) does not have appended to it any information by sticker or any other method.

#### (b) Application

Subsection (a) shall not apply to or restrict a retailer or wholesaler of dietary supplements in any way whatsoever in the sale of books or other publications as a part of the business of such retailer or wholesaler.

#### (c) Burden of proof

In any proceeding brought under subsection (a), the burden of proof shall be on the United States to establish that an article or other such matter is false or misleading.

(June 25, 1938, ch. 675, §403B, as added Pub. L. 103–417, §5, Oct. 25, 1994, 108 Stat. 4328.)
§ 404.1031 Fishing. ( a ) If you work on a boat engaged in catching fish or other forms of aquatic animal life, your work is not employment if you have an arrangement with the owner or operator of the boat which provides for all of the following: ( 1 ) You do not receive any cash pay (other than as provided in paragraph (a)(2) of this section).
( 2 ) You receive a share of the catch or a share of the proceeds from the sale of the catch.
( 3 ) The amount of your share depends on the size of the catch.
( 4 ) The operating crew of the boat (or each boat from which you receive a share if the fishing operation involves more than one boat) is normally made up of fewer than 10 individuals.
( b ) Work excluded from employment under this section is considered to be self-employment (§ 404.1068(e)).
###### Editorial Note on Part 71

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 71 appear by T.D. ATF-414, 64 FR 49084, Sept. 10, 1999and T.D. ATF-463, 66 FR 42734, 42735, Aug. 15, 2001.

#### § 71.72 Before citation.

If a respondent surrenders the permit before citation, the appropriate TTB officer may accept the surrender. But if the evidence, in the opinion of the appropriate TTB officer, warrants citation for suspension, revocation or annulment, the surrender shall be refused and the appropriate TTB officer shall issue the citation.

[T.D. ATF-244, 51 FR 45764, Dec. 22, 1986, as amended by T.D. ATF-374, 61 FR 29957, June 13, 1996]
EXHIBIT
32  CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002  In connection with
the Annual Report on Form 10-K of MWI Veterinary Supply, Inc. (the Company)
for the period ended September 30, 2008 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), we, James F. Cleary, Jr.,
President and Chief Executive Officer, and Mary Patricia B. Thompson, Senior
Vice President of Finance and Administration, Chief Financial Officer,
respectively, of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that
to our knowledge:  (1)The Report fully complies with the requirements of
section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and  (2)The information contained in the Report fairly
presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
operations of the Company as of the dates and for the periods expressed in the
Report.   November 21,
  2008/s/ James F.
  Cleary, Jr.James F.
  Cleary, Jr.President
  and Chief Executive Officer/s/ Mary
  Patricia B. ThompsonMary Patricia B.
  ThompsonSenior
  Vice President of Finance and Administration,Chief
  Financial Officer
§ 402.55 Materials available at district offices and branch offices. ( a ) *Materials available for inspection.* The following are available or will be made available for inspection at the district offices and branch offices: ( 1 ) Compilation of the Social Security Laws.
( 2 ) Social Security Administration regulations under the retirement, survivors, disability, and supplemental security income programs, *i.e.*, 20 CFR parts 401, 402, 404, 416, and 422; and the Social Security Administration's regulations under part B of title IV (Black Lung Benefits) of the Federal Coal Mine Health and Safety Act of 1969, 20 CFR part 410.
( 3 ) Social Security Rulings.
( 4 ) Social Security Handbook.
( 5 ) Social Security Acquiescence Rulings.
( b ) *Materials available for inspection and copying.* The following materials are available or will be made available for inspection and copying at the district offices and branch offices (fees may be applicable per §§ 402.155 through 402.185): ( 1 ) SSA Program Operations Manual System.
( 2 ) SSA Organization Manual.
( 3 ) Handbook for State Social Security Administrators.
( 4 ) Indexes to the materials listed in paragraph (a) of this section and in this paragraph (b) and an index to the Hearings, Appeals and Litigation Law (HALLEX) manual.
( 5 ) Index of Administrative Staff Manuals and Instructions.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

DAY HIGH

 381

 384

 404

 420

 435

 448

 427

 403

 403

 404

 413

 425

 428

 461

 479

 496

 454

 439

 438

 418

 394

 401

 410

 413

 412

 401

 387

 374

 380

 389

 258

 256

 253

 247

 247

 249

 251

 253

 253

 257

 260

 260

 261

 256

 254

 251

 248

 250

 256

 261

 259

 261

 256

 265

 265

 258

 254

 255

 254

 252

 305

 297

 298

 300

 307

 317

 314

 301

 294

 299

 304

 315

 317

 321

 320

 324

 319

 321

 313

 313

 309

 315

 306

 318

 315

 309

 306

 303

 305

 301

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

SEPTEMBER 2006 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: October 3, 2006

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

DELTA MENDOTA CANAL AT CHECK 13 (O'NEILL)
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

DAY HIGH

 25,438

 26,317

 25,509

 25,731

 26,844

 26,473

 25,724

 23,210

 22,111

 21,989

 22,523

 23,931

 25,268

 25,238

 25,632

 27,026

 29,752

 28,212

 25,845

 25,056

 23,209

 23,585

 23,970

 24,718

 24,510

 22,752

 25,752

 25,070

 0

 0

 15,491

 13,895

 15,410

 14,286

 13,870

 14,755

 14,527

 14,140

 12,148

 12,343

 13,738

 14,716

 15,621

 13,783

 13,445

 14,205

 14,856

 15,332

 14,344

 12,938

 13,030

 13,146

 14,035

 13,872

 15,101

 14,057

 14,276

 14,437

 0

 0

 20,638

 21,061

 21,096

 20,664

 21,201

 21,568

 21,069

 19,779

 18,628

 17,953

 18,376

 18,776

 19,832

 19,332

 19,380

 20,245

 22,883

 22,656

 20,941

 19,764

 19,172

 19,519

 19,339

 19,155

 19,397

 18,032

 19,174

 20,242

 0

 0

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

NOVEMBER 2020 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: December 8, 2020

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

PORT CHICAGO BOTTOM IN SUISUN BAY
NOTICE: NOT FOR OFFICIAL PUBLICATION.

UNDER ARIZONA RULE OF THE SUPREME COURT 111(c), THIS DECISION IS NOT PRECEDENTIAL

AND MAY BE CITED ONLY AS AUTHORIZED BY RULE.

IN THE

ARIZONA COURT OF APPEALS

DIVISION ONE

STATE OF ARIZONA, Respondent,

v.

ROBERT LANE LUKE, Petitioner.

No. 1 CA-CR 22-0079 PRPC

Petition for Review from the Superior Court in Maricopa County

No. CR2017-116639-001

The Honorable Michael S. Mandell, Judge

REVIEW GRANTED; RELIEF DENIED

COUNSEL

Maricopa County Attorney’s Office, Phoenix

By Krista Wood

Counsel for Respondent

Robert Lane Luke, Kingman

Petitioner

FILED 11-15-2022
STATE v. LUKE

Decision of the Court

2

MEMORANDUM DECISION

Presiding Judge Maria Elena Cruz, Judge Angela K. Paton, and Judge Peter 

B. Swann delivered the decision of the Court.

PER CURIAM:

¶1 Petitioner Robert Lane Luke seeks review of the superior 

court’s order denying his petition for post-conviction relief. This is 

petitioner’s second successive petition.

¶2 Absent an abuse of discretion or error of law, this court will 

not disturb a superior court’s ruling on a petition for post-conviction relief.

State v. Gutierrez, 229 Ariz. 573, 577, ¶ 19 (2012). It is petitioner’s burden to 

show that the superior court abused its discretion by denying the petition 

for post-conviction relief. See State v. Poblete, 227 Ariz. 537, 538, ¶ 1 (App. 

2011) (petitioner has burden of establishing abuse of discretion on review).

¶3 We have reviewed the record in this matter, the superior 

court’s order denying the petition for post-conviction relief, and the petition 

for review. We find that petitioner has not established an abuse of 

discretion.

¶4 We grant review and deny relief.
EXHIBIT 12
                    BellSouth Corporation
          Computation Of Earnings To Fixed Charges
                    (Dollars In Millions)





                                             
                                              For the Nine
                                              Months Ended
                                             September 30,
                                                  1995
1. Earnings                                  
                                             
   (a) Income from continuing operations     
before deductions for taxes and interest         $3,300.0
                                             
   (b) Portion of rental expense             
representative of interest factor                    69.6
                                             
   (c) Equity in losses from less-than-50%   
owned investments (accounted for under the   
equity method of accounting)                        111.2
                                             
   (d) Excess of earnings over distributions 
of less-than-50%-owned investments           
(accounted for under the equity mehtod of    
accounting)                                         (54.8)
                                             
     TOTAL                                       $3,426.0
                                             
2. Fixed Charges                             
                                             
   (a) Interest                                    $545.7
                                             
   (b) Portion of rental expense             
representative of interest factor                    69.6
                                             
     TOTAL                                         $615.3
                                             
   Ratio (1 divided by 2)                             5.57
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY ELEVATION

 239.54

 239.20

 239.02

 238.95

 238.90

 238.85

 238.81

 238.79

 239.79

 238.75

 238.71

 238.71

 238.73

 238.69

 238.65

 238.62

 238.60

 238.60

 238.58

 238.58

 238.58

 238.56

 238.49

 238.48

 238.47

 238.73

 238.82

 238.87

 238.80

 238.84

 238.79

 415

 374

 352

 345

 340

 335

 331

 329

 445

 325

 320

 320

 322

 318

 314

 311

 309

 309

 307

 307

 307

 305

 298

 297

 296

 322

 332

 337

 330

 334

 329

STORAGE

+12

-41

-22

-7

-5

-5

-4

-2

+116

-120

-5

+0

+2

-4

-4

-3

-2

+0

-2

+0

+0

-2

-7

-1

-1

+26

+10

+5

-7

+4

-5

CHANGE

 50

 50

 50

 50

 50

 50

 177

 93

 90

 90

 90

 152

 303

 231

 347

 278

 170

 170

 170

 227

 279

 378

 375

 176

 176

 176

 279

 399

 400

 451

 466

 9,410

 8,100

 7,760

 7,500

 7,180

 7,090

 7,020

 7,000

 6,910

 6,800

 6,640

 6,620

 6,750

 6,710

 6,600

 6,600

 6,530

 6,400

 6,430

 6,420

 6,600

 6,360

 6,240

 6,960

 6,170

 6,960

 7,620

 7,380

 7,280

 7,420

 7,190

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

MARCH 2007 RED BLUFF DIVERSION RESERVOIR DAILY OPERATIONS RUN DATE: April 2, 2007

IN LAKE

CANAL

 ACRE-FEET

TOTALS -74 6,443 216,650

ACRE-FEET -74 12,780 429,725

SUMMARY

RELEASE (ACRE-FEET)

TOTAL 442,505

 403

RELEASE

RIVER

CORNING TO SACTO

CANAL

RELEASE C.F.S.

TEHAMA

COLUSA

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

CORNING CANAL 0

TEHAMA-COLUSA CANAL 12,780

TO SACTO RIVER 429,725
§ 345.307 Rate protest. ( a ) *Request for reconsideration.* An employer may appeal a determination of a contribution rate computed under this part by filing a request for reconsideration with the Director of Policy and Systems within 90 days after the date on which the Board notified the employer of its rate of contribution for the next ensuing calendar year. Within 45 days of the receipt of a request for reconsideration, the Director shall issue a decision on the protest.
( b ) *Appeal to the Board.* An employer aggrieved by the decision of the Director of Policy and Systems under paragraph (a) of this section may appeal to the Board. Such appeal shall be filed with the Secretary to the Board within 30 days after the date on which the Director notified the employer of the decision on reconsideration. The Board may decide such appeal without a hearing or, in its discretion, may refer the matter to a hearings officer pursuant to part 319 of this chapter.
( c ) *Decision of the Board final.* Subject to judicial review provided for in section 5(f) of the RUIA, the decision of the Board under paragraph (b) of this section is final with respect to all issues determined therein.
( d ) *Waiver of time limits.* A request for reconsideration or appeal under this section shall be forfeited if the request or appeal is not filed within the time prescribed, unless reasonable cause, as defined in this part, for failure to file timely is shown.
( e ) *Rate pending review.* Pending review of the protested rate, the employer shall continue to pay contributions at such rate. Any adjustment in the contributions paid at such rate as the result of an appeal shall be in accordance with § 345.118 of this part.
( f ) The amount of a contribution, interest, or penalty may be protested in accord with § 345.124 of this part.
[67 FR 13568, Mar. 25, 2002, as amended at 80 FR 13764, Mar. 17, 2015]
§ 1002.259 How does USERRA protect an employee's pension benefits? On reemployment, the employee is treated as not having a break in service with the employer or employers maintaining a pension plan, for purposes of participation, vesting and accrual of benefits, by reason of the period of absence from employment due to or necessitated by service in the uniformed services. ( a ) Depending on the length of the employee's period of service, he or she is entitled to take from one to ninety days following service before reporting back to work or applying for reemployment (See § 1002.115). This period of time must be treated as continuous service with the employer for purposes of determining participation, vesting and accrual of pension benefits under the plan.
( b ) If the employee is hospitalized for, or convalescing from, an illness or injury incurred in, or aggravated during, service, he or she is entitled to report to or submit an application for reemployment at the end of the time period necessary for him or her to recover from the illness or injury. This period, which may not exceed two years from the date the employee completed service, except in circumstances beyond his or her control, must be treated as continuous service with the employer for purposes of determining the participation, vesting and accrual of pension benefits under the plan.
### SUBCHAPTER I—EXAMINATION OF ANIMALS, MEATS, AND MEAT AND DAIRY PRODUCTS