alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
AMENDMENT TO THE BELLSOUTH PERSONAL RETIREMENT
                                   ACCOUNT PENSION PLAN


 This Amendment is made to the BellSouth  Personal  Retirement  Account  Pension
Plan (the "Plan") which was amended and restated  effective January 1, 1998. The
Chairman of the  BellSouth  Employees'  Benefit Claim Review  Committee,  acting
under authority  delegated by the Nominating and  Compensation  Committee of the
Board of Directors of BellSouth Corporation, hereby amends the plan as follows:

                                                            1.

 Pursuant  to  Paragraphs  15.01 and 16.03 of the Plan,  individuals  who become
employees of  Westel-Indianapolis  Company  pursunat to Section 5.7 of the Asset
Purchase  Agreement  by and among  BellSouth  Cellular  Corporation,  Indiana 8,
L.L.C., United States Cellular Corporation, and United States Cellular Operating
Company,  dated March 19, 1999, (the  "Agreement")  will be granted Net Credited
Service,  Vesting Service Credit and Vesting Eligibility Years for their service
with United States Cellular  Corporation and its affiliates prior the closing of
the transaction contemplated by the Agreement.

 The  above  amendment  shall be  effective  as of the date  this  amendment  is
approved. 

 Approved this 7th day of April, 1999.

EMPLOYEES' BENEFIT CLAIM REVIEW COMMITTEE:



         /s/ Richard D. Sibbernsen
By:      Richard D. Sibbernsen, Chairman
### §20. Apples in interstate commerce; standard grades

The standard grades for apples when packed in barrels which shall be shipped or delivered for shipment in interstate or foreign commerce, or which shall be sold or offered for sale within the District of Columbia or the Territories of the United States shall be as follows: Apples of one variety, which are well-grown specimens, hand picked, of good color for the variety, normal shape, practically free from insect and fungous injury, bruises, and other defects, except such as are necessarily caused in the operation of packing, or apples of one variety which are not more than 10 per centum below the foregoing specifications shall be "Standard grade minimum size two and one-half inches", if the minimum size of the apples is two and one-half inches in transverse diameter; "Standard grade minimum size two and one-fourth inches", if the minimum size of the apples is two and one-fourth inches in transverse diameter; or "Standard grade minimum size two inches", if the minimum size of the apples is two inches in transverse diameter.

(Aug. 3, 1912, ch. 273, §2, 37 Stat. 250.)
Exhibit 10.1
 SECOND AMENDMENT TO
AGREEMENT OF LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
 OF
 APARTMENT TRUST OF AMERICA HOLDINGS, LP
(f/k/a Grubb & Ellis Apartment REIT Holdings, LP)
        Name
 Name
 Effect




---



##### 



Defined Terms; References
 Invalidity of Provisions
 Entire Agreement
 [Signature on the Following Page]




---



##### 



GENERAL PARTNER:
APARTMENT TRUST OF AMERICA, INC.,
a Maryland corporationBy:
    /s/ Stanley J. Olander, Jr.Name:
    Stanley J. Olander, Jr.Title:
    Chief Executive Officer and Chairman of the Board of Directors
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY HIGH

 26,658

 26,438

 26,314

 24,911

 23,207

 20,862

 20,469

 21,499

 23,513

 20,534

 18,434

 17,426

 16,725

 16,906

 18,569

 18,135

 17,523

 17,939

 16,088

 13,742

 11,120

 11,891

 12,715

 16,271

 17,553

 15,802

 15,007

 15,054

 15,398

 15,470

 15,424

 12,976

 12,725

 12,475

 13,212

 13,290

 12,951

 12,296

 12,421

 13,295

 9,701

 7,221

 5,176

 4,424

 4,583

 5,190

 5,158

 5,050

 4,914

 5,629

 5,163

 4,036

 3,572

 3,769

 5,153

 6,481

 4,870

 3,941

 3,322

 3,403

 3,714

 3,962

 19,781

 19,195

 19,036

 19,014

 18,618

 17,670

 16,671

 16,609

 16,472

 14,364

 12,147

 10,653

 9,836

 9,988

 10,808

 11,031

 10,649

 10,898

 10,528

 9,557

 8,013

 7,655

 7,433

 9,204

 10,076

 9,338

 9,057

 8,906

 9,057

 9,413

 9,708

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

JANUARY 2018 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: February 1, 2018

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

PORT CHICAGO TOP IN SUISUN BAY
#### Clifford BVOCIK, Plaintiff, v. The FIRESTONE TIRE & RUBBER COMPANY, Defendant and Third-Party Plaintiff, v. OLIN MATHIESON CHEMICAL CORP. and Jon LeClaire, Third-Party Defendants. W. B. MILBRATH, INC., Plaintiff, v. The FIRESTONE TIRE & RUBBER COMPANY, Defendant and Third-Party Plaintiff, v. OLIN MATHIESON CHEMICAL CORP. and Jon LeClaire, Third-Party Defendants. Jon LeCLAIRE, Plaintiff, v. The FIRESTONE TIRE & RUBBER COMPANY, Defendant and Third-Party Plaintiff, v. OLIN MATHIESON CHEMICAL CORPORATION, Third-Party Defendant. Williams B. MILBRATH, Plaintiff, v. The FIRESTONE TIRE *&*RUBBER COMPANY, Defendant and Third-Party Plaintiff, v. OLIN MATHIESON CHEMICAL CORP., Jon LeClaire and W. B. Milbrath, Inc., Third-Party Defendants.

Nos. 63-C-85, 66-C-87, 63-C-86, 66-C-88.

United States District Court E. D. Wisconsin.

Dec. 29, 1967.

*211Foley, Sammond & Lardner, Milwaukee, Wis., for Firestone Tire & Rubber Co.

Habush, Gillick & Habush, Milwaukee, Wis., for Clifford Bvocik and Jon Le-Claire.

Wickham, Borgelt, Skogstad & Powell, Milwaukee, Wis., for W. B. Milbrath, Inc.

Kivett & Kasdorf, Milwaukee, Wis., for Olin Mathieson Chemical Corp.

ORDER

MYRON L. GORDON, District Judge.

The defendant, Firestone Tire & Rubber Company, has moved for a separate trial on the issue of damages, and the court concludes that there is merit in such motion.

Prior to the pretrial conference, the attorneys for the plaintiffs submitted a list of 70 prospective witnesses, over half of whom would offer evidence with reference to the question of damages. While the plaintiffs have now substantially reduced this list of witnesses, the court nevertheless considers that in the proper exercise of its judgment, separate trials on liability and damages should be ordered pursuant to rule 42(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. The complexity of both the liability and the damage issues warrants, in my opinion, the use of the separate trial device. I believe that separate trials will be conducive to expedition and economy. Romer v. Baldwin, 36 F.R.D. 259 (E.D.Pa.1963).

In accordance with Hosie v. Chicago & North Western Railway Co., 282 F.2d 639 (7th Cir. 1960), the court contemplates that if the jury’s verdict is favorable to the plaintiff, the damage question will be submitted to the same jury immediately thereafter.

Accordingly, it is ordered that the motion of Firestone Tire & Rubber Co. for separate trials is granted.
### §§6161, 6162. Omitted

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Sections 6161 and 6162 were omitted pursuant to section 6251 of this title which provided that the authority under this chapter terminated on Oct. 1, 2001.

Section 6161, Pub. L. 103–239, title II, §221, May 4, 1994, 108 Stat. 592, authorized grants.

Section 6162, Pub. L. 103–239, title II, §222, May 4, 1994, 108 Stat. 592, related to requirements for grant recipients.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

DAY ELEVATION

 238.88

 239.13

 239.02

 239.00

 238.91

 238.84

 238.81

 238.83

 238.96

 238.88

 238.93

 238.95

 238.99

 238.86

 238.76

 238.75

 238.65

 238.71

 238.63

 238.63

 238.66

 238.70

 238.62

 238.68

 238.62

 238.61

 238.61

 238.60

 238.60

 238.60

 338

 366

 352

 350

 341

 334

 331

 333

 346

 338

 343

 345

 349

 336

 326

 325

 314

 320

 312

 312

 315

 319

 311

 317

 311

 310

 310

 309

 309

 309

STORAGE

-13

+28

-14

-2

-9

-7

-3

+2

+13

-8

+5

+2

+4

-13

-10

-1

-11

+6

-8

+0

+3

+4

-8

+6

-6

-1

+0

-1

+0

+0

CHANGE

 517

 312

 402

 328

 416

 494

 413

 438

 522

 530

 378

 300

 53

 119

 313

 331

 331

 200

 155

 69

 138

 48

 96

 90

 209

 171

 203

 226

 116

 126

 9,010

 9,070

 9,150

 9,210

 8,850

 8,600

 8,560

 8,640

 8,950

 8,640

 8,890

 8,930

 8,600

 8,130

 8,130

 8,190

 7,920

 7,840

 7,650

 7,460

 7,460

 7,630

 7,420

 7,500

 7,550

 7,570

 7,360

 7,270

 7,440

 7,400

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

SEPTEMBER 2010 RED BLUFF DIVERSION RESERVOIR DAILY OPERATIONS RUN DATE: October 1, 2010

IN LAKE

CANAL

 ACRE-FEET

TOTALS -42 8,044 245,020

ACRE-FEET -42 15,955 485,997

SUMMARY

RELEASE (ACRE-FEET)

TOTAL 504,451

 351

RELEASE

RIVER

CORNING TO SACTO

CANAL

RELEASE C.F.S

TEHAMA

COLUSA

 43

 69

 73

 69

 56

 0

 84

 45

 23

 34

 50

 42

 36

 43

 0

 45

 38

 57

 45

 78

 26

 20

 33

 37

 35

 41

 57

 16

 30

 35

 1,260

 2,499

CORNING CANAL 2,499

TEHAMA-COLUSA CANAL 15,955

TO SACTO RIVER 485,997
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Rodolfo ALVARADO-HENRIQUEZ, also known as Julio Alberto Hernandez-Orellana, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 05-41403.

Conference Calendar.

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.

Decided July 13, 2006.

James Lee Turner, Assistant U.S. Attorney, Houston, TX, for Plaintiff-Appellee.

Marjorie A. Meyers, Federal Public Defender, Laura Fletcher Leavitt, Assistant Federal Public Defender, Sarah Beth Lan*368dau, Houston, TX, for Defendant-Appellant.

Before DAVIS, BARKSDALE, and DeMOSS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: *

Appealing the Judgment in a Criminal Case, Rodolfo Alvarado-Henriquez raises arguments that are foreclosed by *Almendarez-Torres v. United States,*523 U.S. 224, 235, 118 S.Ct. 1219, 140 L.Ed.2d 350 (1998), which held that 8 U.S.C. § 1326(b)(2) is a penalty provision and not a separate criminal offense. The Government’s motion for summary affirmance is GRANTED, and the judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.

*

 Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.
NO. 07-08-0468-CR

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE SEVENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

AT AMARILLO

PANEL B

FEBRUARY 27, 2009

______________________________

BARBARA EVONNE HILL, 

Appellant

v.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, 

Appellee

_________________________________

FROM THE 252 DISTRICT COURT OF HALE COUNTY; ND

NO. B17507-0801; HON. ED SELF, PRESIDING

_______________________________

Anders Opinion

_______________________________

Before QUINN, C.J., and CAMPBELL and HANCOCK, JJ.

Barbara Evonne Hill (appellant) appeals her conviction for possession of a

controlled substance within 1,000 feet of a school, enhanced. Punishment was assessed

by the jury at sixty years in the Texas Department of Criminal Justice Institutional Division.

Appellant timely filed her notice of appeal. 

 
See Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 744-45, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). 1

Counsel shall, within five days after this opinion is handed down, send his client a copy of the opinion

2

and judgment, along with notification of appellant’s right to file a pro se petition for discretionary review. See

Tex. R. App. P. 48.4.

2

Appellant’s appointed counsel has filed a motion to withdraw, together with an

Anders brief, wherein he certifies that, after diligently searching the record, he has 1

concluded that appellant’s appeal is without merit. Along with his brief, he has filed a copy

of a letter sent to appellant informing her of counsel’s belief that there was no reversible

error and of appellant’s right to appeal pro se. By letter dated January 16, 2009, this court

notified appellant of her right to file her own brief or response by February 17, 2009, if she

wished to do so. To date, appellant has not filed a response. 

In compliance with the principles enunciated in Anders, appellate counsel discussed

one possible ground for appeal, that being the sufficiency of the evidence to support guilt.

However, appellate counsel, after reviewing the evidence presented at trial, found the

evidence to be both legally and factually sufficient. Thereafter, we conducted our own

review of the record to assess the accuracy of appellate counsel’s conclusions and to

uncover any error, reversible or otherwise, pursuant to Stafford v. State, 813 S.W.2d 503

(Tex. Crim. App. 1991), and concluded the same. 

Accordingly, the motion to withdraw is granted and the judgment is affirmed.2

Brian Quinn 

 Chief Justice 

 

Do not publish.
§ 9.92 Madera. ( a ) *Name.* The name of the viticultural area described in this section is “Madera.”
( b ) *Approved maps.* The approved maps for determining the boundary of the Madera viticultural area are eleven U.S.G.S. maps. They are entitled: ( 1 ) “Clovis, Cal.,” 71 ⁄ 2 minute series, edition of 1964, photorevised 1972;
( 2 ) “Fresno North, Cal.,” 71 ⁄ 2 minute series, edition of 1965, photorevised 1972;
( 3 ) “Friant, Cal.,” 71 ⁄ 2 minute series, edition of 1964;
( 4 ) “Lanes Bridge, Cal.,” 71 ⁄ 2 minute series, edition of 1964, photoinspected 1973;
( 5 ) “Gregg, Cal.,” 71 ⁄ 2 minute series, edition of 1965;
( 6 ) “Madera, Cal.,” 71 ⁄ 2 minute series, edition of 1963;
( 7 ) “Kismet, Cal.,” 71 ⁄ 2 minute series, edition of 1961;
( 8 ) “Raynor Creek, Cal.,” 71 ⁄ 2 minute series, edition of 1961;
( 9 ) “Fresno, Cal.,” scaled 1:250,000, edition of 1962, revised 1971;
( 10 ) “Monterey, Cal.,” scaled 1:250,000, edition of 1974; and
( 11 ) “San Jose, Cal.,” scaled 1:250,000, edition of 1962, revised 1969.
( c ) *Boundaries.* The Madera viticultural area is located in Madera and Fresno Counties, California. The beginning point is found on the “Fresno North,” 71 ⁄ 2 minute series U.S.G.S. map at the point where the San Joaquin River intersects the section line dividing sections 20 and 29, and sections 21 and 28, T. 12 S., R. 20 E.; ( 1 ) Then east approximately 6 miles following the section line and Shepherd Avenue to the intersection with Sunnyside Road;
( 2 ) Then north approximately 7 miles following Sunnyside Road and continuing along the section line to the point of intersection of section 16, 17, 20, and 21, T.11S., R 21E.;
( 3 ) Then west approximately 17.6 miles following the section line and continuing along Avenue 15 to the intersection with the Atchison, Topeka and Santa Fe Railroad;
( 4 ) Then northwest following the Atchison, Topeka and Santa Fe Railroad to Road 26;
( 5 ) Then north following Road 26 and continuing north in a straight line to the Chowchilla River in the “Raynor Creek” 71 ⁄ 2 minute series U.S.G.S. map, and in the “San Jose” scaled 1:250,000 U.S.G.S. map;
( 6 ) Then west following the Chowchilla River to the point where the Madera County-Merced County boundary diverges from the river;
( 7 ) Then southwest following the Madera County-Merced County boundary to the San Joaquin River;
( 8 ) Then following the San Joaquin River south and east returning to the point of beginning.
[T.D. ATF-192, 49 FR 47833, Dec. 12, 1984; 50 FR 2782, Jan. 22, 1985, as amended by T.D. ATF-249, 52 FR 5960, Feb. 27, 1987]
[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 70 (Tuesday, April 12, 2011)]
[Notices]
[Pages 20434-20435]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2011-8696]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Office of the Secretary


Notice of Applications for Certificates of Public Convenience and 
Necessity and Foreign Air Carrier Permits Filed Under Subpart B 
(Formerly Subpart Q) During the Week Ending March 19, 2011

    The following Applications for Certificates of Public Convenience 
and Necessity and Foreign Air Carrier Permits were filed under subpart 
B (formerly subpart Q) of the Department of Transportation's Procedural 
Regulations (See 14 CFR 301.201 et. seq.). The due date for Answers, 
Conforming Applications, or Motions to Modify Scope are set forth below 
for each application. Following the Answer period DOT may process the 
application by expedited procedures. Such procedures may consist of the 
adoption of a show-cause order, a tentative order, or in appropriate 
cases a final order without further proceedings.
    Docket Number: DOT-OST-2011-0051.
    Date Filed: March 17, 2011.
    Due Date for Answers, Conforming Applications, or Motion to Modify 
Scope: April 7, 2011.
    Description: Joint application of Southwest Airlines Co. and 
AirTran Airways, Inc. requesting approval of the de facto route 
transfer that will result from Southwest's acquisition of AirTran.
    Docket Number: DOT-OST-2008-0062.
    Date Filed: March 18, 2011.
    Due Date for Answers, Conforming Applications, or Motion to Modify 
Scope: April 8, 2011.
    Description: Application of XL Airways France requesting renewal of 
its exemption authority to engage in: (i) Foreign scheduled and charter 
air transportation of persons, property and mail from any point or 
points behind any Member State of the European Union via any point or 
points in any Member State and via intermediate points to any point or 
points in the United States and beyond; (ii) foreign scheduled and 
charter air transportation of persons, property, and mail between any 
point or points in the United States and any point or points in any 
member of the European Common Aviation Area; (iii) foreign scheduled 
and charter cargo air transportation between any point or points in the 
United States and any other point or points; (iv) other charters 
pursuant to the prior approval requirements; and (v) transportation 
authorized by any additional route

[[Page 20435]]

rights made available to European Community carriers in the future. XL 
Airways France further requests issuance of a foreign air carrier 
permit to enable XL Airways France to engage in the same foreign air 
transportation described above.

Renee V. Wright,
Program Manager, Docket Operations, Federal Register Liaison.
[FR Doc. 2011-8696 Filed 4-11-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-9X-P
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY HIGH

 268

 277

 250

 260

 241

 242

 233

 212

 215

 227

 237

 237

 227

 212

 207

 203

 199

 202

 207

 211

 193

 189

 185

 178

 182

 177

 175

 177

 183

 183

 180

 190

 174

 173

 162

 163

 172

 173

 174

 170

 177

 180

 182

 183

 175

 176

 175

 175

 174

 173

 171

 168

 166

 165

 163

 161

 159

 155

 154

 154

 155

 163

 224

 212

 207

 201

 199

 201

 196

 189

 188

 193

 198

 198

 195

 188

 184

 183

 182

 182

 182

 183

 178

 174

 172

 168

 167

 164

 162

 160

 162

 166

 168

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

MAY 2010 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: June 16, 2010

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

RIO VISTA ON THE SACRAMENTO RIVER
#### § 25.5 How does OWCP adjudicate claims of non-citizen residents of possessions or territories?

An employee who is a bona fide permanent resident of any United States possession, territory, commonwealth, or trust territory will receive the full benefits of the FECA, as amended, except that the application of the minimum benefit provisions provided therein shall be governed by the restrictions set forth in 5 U.S.C. 8138.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1995
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1995
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1995
<CASH>                                              40
<SECURITIES>                                        33
<RECEIVABLES>                                       66
<ALLOWANCES>                                         2
<INVENTORY>                                         56
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                   195
<PP&E>                                             294
<DEPRECIATION>                                     161
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                     358
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                               54
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            21
<OTHER-SE>                                          81
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                       358
<SALES>                                            426
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                   426
<CGS>                                              400
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                      414
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   9
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                     10
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                 10
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                        10
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .46
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
Electrical Conductivity, UMHOS

Day High Low Mean

1 12,616 794 5,360

2 13,049 1,039 6,113

3 15,933 1,593 6,749

4 9,050 1,963 5,487

5 9,806 2,023 5,900

6 13,551 2,049 6,621

7 10,722 2,112 6,748

8 11,274 1,840 6,642

9 11,849 1,942 6,061

10 11,228 1,806 5,302

11 11,047 1,968 5,389

12 10,562 2,217 6,443

13 13,442 2,499 7,402

14 9,881 2,721 6,850

15 10,441 2,910 7,418

16 10,168 2,958 7,428

17 10,445 3,508 6,975

18 10,138 3,309 7,303

19 9,941 3,100 6,903

20 9,647 2,721 6,659

21 10,630 2,358 6,580

22 9,657 2,022 6,159

23 7,813 2,132 5,306

24 4,760 1,531 3,136

25 4,104 1,483 2,252

26 9,852 1,538 5,133

27 10,342 4,356 7,898

28 11,650 4,393 8,722

29 10,525 4,578 7,229

30 10,866 4,481 7,957

31 10,712 4,748 8,203

COMMENT(S):

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

Historical Archive and Report Database

Port Chicago Bottom In Suisun Bay

Period: July 2023 Run Date: 8/15/2023