alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### Kenneth L. OSBORN v. COMMONWEALTH, COURT OF COMMON PLEAS, CRAWFORD COUNTY and Sheriff Zimmer.

Civ. A. No. 67-1366.

United States District Court W. D. Pennsylvania.

Dec. 12, 1967.

Kenneth L. Osborn, pro se.

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

MARSH, District Judge.

The relator, Kenneth L. Osborn, has filed a petition for a writ of habeas corpus in this court, naming as respondents Commonwealth, Court of Common Pleas, Crawford County, and Sheriff Zimmer. It does not name as respondent the Superintendent of the State Correctional Institution at Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, who presently has custody of the relator as appears from a letter accompanying the petition for the writ. For this reason the application for the writ must be dismissed. Section 2242, Title 28 U.S.C.A., provides that the application for the writ shall allege the name of the person who has custody over the applicant. A person having custody should be named as respondent in the application, for it is he who makes the return certifying the true cause of detention and it is he who carries out the order of the court if the writ is granted. Title 28 U.S.C.A., § 2243. Failure to so allege the person having custody of relator is fatal to the right to a writ of habeas corpus. Gaito v. Strauss, 368 F. 2d 787, 788 (3d Cir. 1966); King v. State of California, 356 F.2d 950 (9th Cir. 1966); Morehead v. State of California, 339 F.2d 170 (9th Cir. 1964); Roseborough v. People of State of California, 322 F.2d 788 (9th Cir. 1963); United States ex rel. Lyle v. Carney, 277 F.Supp. 250 (W.D.Pa. November 28, 1967).

Furthermore, it does not appear from the petition that the relator has exhausted his state remedies. Title 28 U.S. C. A. § 2254. United States ex rel. Ackerman v. Johnston, 139 F.Supp. 890 (W.D.Pa.1955), aff’d 235 F.2d 958 (3d Cir. 1956).

An appropriate order will be entered.
§ 9.112 Arkansas Mountain. ( a ) *Name.* The name of the viticultural area described in this section is “Arkansas Mountain.”
( b ) *Approved maps.* The appropriate maps for determining the boundary of the Arkansas Mountain viticultural area are two U.S.G.S. maps, titled: ( 1 ) Russellville, Arkansas, 1:250,000 series compiled in 1954.
( 2 ) Fort Smith, Arkansas-Oklahoma, 1:250,000 series, 1978.
( c ) *Boundary* — ( 1 ) *General.* The Arkansas Mountain viticultural area is located in northwestern Arkansas. Starting at the point where Frog Bayou converges with the Arkansas River, near Yoestown, Arkansas (or the Fort Smith map), the boundary proceeds:
( 2 ) *Boundary Description.* ( i ) Southwestward along the Arkansas River to Vache Grasse Creek.
( ii ) Then southeastward and southwestward following Vache Grasse Creek to the place where it is crossed by Arkansas Highway 10, near Greenwood, Arkansas.
( iii ) From there westward along Highway 10 to U.S. Highway 71. (Note: Highway 10 is the primary highway leading to Greenwood to Hackett, Arkansas.)
( iv ) Then southward and eastward along Highway 71 until it crosses Rock Creek.
( v ) Then northeastward along Rock Creek to Petit Jean Creek.
( vi ) Then generally northeastward and eastward along Petit Jean Creek until it becomes the Petit Jean River (on the Russellville map).
( vii ) Then generally eastward along the Petit Jean River, flowing through Blue Mountain Lake, until the Petit Jean River joins the Arkansas River.
( viii ) Then generally eastward along the Arkansas River to Cadron Creek.
( ix ) Then generally northward and northeastward along Cadron Creek to the place where it is crossed by U.S. Highway 65.
( x ) From there northward along Highway 65 to its intersection with Arkansas Highway 16 near Clinton, Arkansas.
( xi ) From there following Highway 16 generally westward to its intersection with Arkansas Highway 23 in Brashears, Arkansas.
( xii ) From there southward along Highway 23 to the Madison County-Franklin County line.
( xiii ) Then westward and southward along that county line to the Madison County-Crawford County line.
( xiv ) Then westward along that county line to the Washington County-Crawford County line.
( xv ) Then westward along that county line to Jones Fork (on the Fort Smith map).
( xvi ) Then southward along Jones Fork until it joins Frog Bayou near Winfrey, Arkansas.
( xvii ) Then generally southward along Frog Bayou, flowing through Lake Shepherd Springs and Lake Fort Smith, to the starting point.
[T.D. ATF-235, 51 FR 34205, Sept. 26, 1986]
§ 234.12 1937 Act lump-sum death payment. ( a ) The 1937 Act LSDP is payable in the following order and amounts: ( 1 ) The employee's “living with” widow(er) is paid the total amount of the LSDP. (Refer to § 234.21 for an explanation of “living with.”)
( 2 ) A funeral home, which has unpaid expenses, is paid the amount of the unpaid expenses or the total amount of the LSDP, whichever is less.
( 3 ) An equitably entitled person is paid the total amount of the LSDP or a proportionate share of the LSDP, depending upon the amount of burial expenses he or she paid.
( b ) The 1937 Act LSDP is equal to ten times the basic amount. (Refer to § 234.20 for an explanation of the computation of the employee's basic amount.)
#### The People of the State of New York ex rel. Jay Street Connecting Railroad, Relator, v. Edward E. McCall and Others, as Commissioners Constituting the Public Service Commission of the State of New York, First District, etc., Respondents.

Writ dismissed and proceedings confirmed, with costs. Ho opinion. Order to be settled on notice. Present — Ingraham, P. J., McLaughlin, Laughlin, Clarke and Scott, JJ.
STEAM ELECTRIC CBI REPLACEMENT PAGE 

EPA-HQ-OW-2009-0819 

DCN: SE02897

THE FOLLOWING HAS BEEN REMOVED BECAUSE IT 

CONTAINS CONFIDENTIAL BUSINESS INFORMATION 

(CBI) PER 40 CFR PART 2, SUBPART B.
(No. 6772

#### Mildred R. Jackson, M.D., Claimant, *vs.*State of Illinois, Department of Children and Family Services, Respondent.

*Opinion filed November 3, 1972.*

Dr. Mildred R. Jackson, Claimant, pro se.

William J. Scott, Attorney General; Saul R. Wexler, Assistant Attorney General, for Respondent.

Per Curiam.
§ 9.47 Hudson River Region. ( a ) *Name.* The name of the viticultural area described in this section is “Hudson River Region.”
( b ) *Approved maps.* The approved maps for determining the boundaries of Hudson River Region viticultural area are four U.S.G.S. maps, as follows: ( 1 ) Albany (NK 18-6), scale of 1:250,000 series;
( 2 ) Hartford (NK 18-9), scale of 1:250,000 series;
( 3 ) Scranton (NK 18-8), scale of 1:250,000 series;
( 4 ) Binghamton (NK 18-5), scale of 1:250,000 series.
( c ) *Boundary.* The Hudson River Region viticultural area is located in New York State. The boundary is as follows: ( 1 ) The beginning point is the point where N.Y. Route 15 (Merritt Parkway) crosses the New York-Connecticut state line.
( 2 ) The boundary proceeds northerly along the New York-Connecticut state line and the New York-Massachusetts state line to the northeast corner of Columbia County, New York.
( 3 ) The boundary proceeds westerly along the Columbia County-Rensselaer County line to the Columbia County-Greene County line in the Hudson River.
( 4 ) The boundary proceeds southerly along the Columbia County-Greene County line in the Hudson River to the northeast corner of Ulster County.
( 5 ) The boundary proceeds westerly along the Ulster County-Greene County line to N.Y. Route 214.
( 6 ) The boundary proceeds southerly along the eastern side of N.Y. Route 214 to the junction with N.Y. Route 28 in Phoenicia.
( 7 ) The boundary proceeds southerly along the eastern side of N.Y. Route 28 to the junction with N.Y. Route 28A.
( 8 ) The boundary proceeds southerly along the eastern side of N.Y. Route 28A to the intersection with the secondary, hard surface, southbound road leading toward Samsonville.
( 9 ) The boundary proceeds southerly along the eastern side of this southbound road through Samsonville, Tabasco, Mombaccus, Fantinekill, and Pataukunk to the junction with U.S. Route 209.
( 10 ) The boundary proceeds southerly along the eastern side of U.S. Route 209 to the New York-Pennsylvania state line in the Delaware River.
( 11 ) The boundary proceeds easterly along the Delaware River to the New York-New Jersey state line.
( 12 ) The boundary proceeds easterly along the New York-New Jersey state line to N.Y. Route 17.
( 13 ) The boundary proceeds northerly along the western side of N.Y. Route 17 to the junction with Interstate Route 287.
( 14 ) The boundary proceeds easterly along the northern side of Interstate Route 287 to the junction with N.Y. Route 15.
( 15 ) The boundary proceeds easterly along the northern side of N.Y. Route 15 to the beginning point.
[T.D. ATF-105, 47 FR 24294, June 4, 1982]
§ 266.5 Order of preference in selecting a representative payee. As a guide in selecting a representative payee, categories of preferred payees have been established. These preferences are flexible. The primary concern of the Board is to select the payee who will best serve the annuitant's interest. The preferences are: ( a ) For annuitants 18 years old or older, the preference is: ( 1 ) A legal guardian, spouse, or other relative who has custody of the annuitant or who demonstrates strong concern for the personal welfare of the annuitant;
( 2 ) A friend who has custody of the annuitant or demonstrates strong concern for the personal welfare of the annuitant;
( 3 ) A public or nonprofit agency or institution having custody of the annuitant;
( 4 ) A private institution operated for profit and licensed under State law, which has custody of the annuitant; and
( 5 ) Persons other than those listed above who are qualified to carry out the responsibilities of a representative payee and who are able and willing to serve as a payee for an annuitant; *e.g.,* members of community groups or organizations who volunteer to serve as representative payee for an annuitant.
( b ) For annuitants under age 18, the preference is: ( 1 ) A natural or adoptive parent who has custody of the annuitant, or a legal guardian;
( 2 ) A natural or adoptive parent who does not have custody of the annuitant, but is contributing toward the annuitant's support and is demonstrating strong concern for the annuitant's well-being;
( 3 ) A relative or stepparent who has custody of the annuitant;
( 4 ) A natural or adoptive parent who does not have custody of the annuitant and is not contributing toward his or her support but is demonstrating strong concern for the annuitant's well-being;
( 5 ) A relative who does not have custody of the annuitant but is contributing toward the annuitant's support and is demonstrating concern for the annuitant's well-being;
( 6 ) A relative or close friend who does not have custody of the annuitant but is demonstrating concern for the annuitant's well-being; and
( 7 ) An authorized social agency or custodial institution.
### R egu l a t ory E v a l u a ti on

D oc k et N o. F AA

- D ir e c t o r a t e I den ti f i e r : 

### 20 1 2

- SW

- 025

- AD

I f y ou m ake chan g es t o t he va l u e s i n t h e t a b l e b e l o w

, y ou m ust ens u re t he t o t a l s u pda t e acc o rd i ng l y. I f

t hey do n o t

, c l i ck ( or Tab) i n t o and t h en o u t of t he ch a nged c e l l

.

Es t i m at ed C o s t s:

A cti o n

( e

. g

. , I ns p ecti o n

,

r e p lace m e n t)

Do no t i n cl u d e o n

c ond iti o n c o s ts h e r e C o s ts p er P r o duct ( e

. g

. , ai r c r a f t, e n g i n e,

prop elle r

, a pp lia n ce)

W or k

- h o u r s

( i n cl u d e

acce ss

, te s t i n g

,

a n d cl o s e

- u p ) L a bor

c o st

( @ $85 /h

o u r ) P a r ts C o st T o tal C o s ts

( la bo r +

p a r t s ) N u m b er of

U

. S.

Re g i s t ered

P r o duc t s T o tal C o s t

f o r U

. S. Fleet



### initi a l insp ec tion 0.5 $ 42

. 50 $ 42

. 50 

### 60 $2,5 5 0. 0 0



### modi f i ca tion 1.0 $ 85

. 00 $500 $ 58 5 .00 

### 60 $35, 1 00

. 00

$ 0

. 00 $ 0

. 00 $ 0

. 00

$ 0

. 00 $ 0

. 00 $ 0

. 00

$ 0

. 00 $ 0

. 00 $ 0

. 00

$ 0

. 00 $ 0

. 00 $ 0

. 00

$ 0

. 00 $ 0

. 00 $ 0

. 00

$ 0

. 00 $ 0

. 00 $ 0

. 00

$ 0

. 00 $ 0

. 00 $ 0

. 00

$ 0

. 00 $ 0

. 00 $ 0

. 00

$ 0

. 00 $ 0

. 00 $ 0

. 00

$ 0

. 00 $ 0

. 00 $ 0

. 00

$ 0

. 00 $ 0

. 00 $ 0

. 00

$ 0

. 00 $ 0

. 00 $ 0

. 00

$ 0

. 00 $ 0

. 00 $ 0

. 00

$ 0

. 00 $ 0

. 00 $ 0

. 00

$ 0

. 00 $ 0

. 00 $ 0

. 00

$ 0

. 00 $ 0

. 00 $ 0

. 00

$ 0

. 00 $ 0

. 00 $ 0

. 00

$ 0

. 00 $ 0

. 00 $ 0

. 00



### T he k no w n nu m ber of p r o d uc t s i n c o m p li an c e:

T o t a l C os t s o f co m p li a n ce f or U .S. f l e e t : $37, 6 50



### C os t s co v e r ed u nd e r w a r r a n t y ( i f kno w n ) $

O n

- C o ndi t i o n C o s t s :

A cti o n

( e

. g

. , I ns p ecti o n

,

r e p lace m e n t) W or k

- h o u r s

( i n cl u d e acce s s

,

te s t i ng

, a n d cl o s e

u p ) L a bo r c o s t

( @ $85 / h o u r ) P a r ts C o s t C o s t p er P r o d u ct

$ 0

. 00 $ 0

. 00

$ 0

. 00 $ 0

. 00

$ 0

. 00 $ 0

. 00

$ 0

. 00 $ 0

. 00



### Spec i a l co n s i d er a ti o n s f o r E cono m i c A n a l y s i s ( U s e th is field to ex p l a in a n yth i n g in th e E s tim a ted C o s ts t ab le

t ha t w a s a ss u med o r mi gh t no t b e ob v i ou s

. T h is field c a n a l s o b e u s ed t o ex p l a in w a rr an ty c o s t s) 

### :
**Exhibit 32**

 

**CERTIFICATION**

 

Each of the undersigned hereby certifies, for the purposes of section 1350 of chapter 63 of title 18 of the United States Code, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, in his capacity as an officer of Bidz.com, Inc. (“Bidz.com”), that, to his knowledge, the Annual Report of Bidz.com on Form 10-K for the period ended December 31, 2010 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained in such report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operation of Bidz.com.

 
| Date:   March 11,   2011 | By     | /s/   David Zinberg       |
|----------------------------------------------|--------|---------------------------|
|                                         |   | David   Zinberg           |
|                                         |   | Chief   Executive Officer |
|                                         |   |                      |
| Date:   March 11,   2011 | By     | /s/   Lawrence Kong       |
|                                         |   | Lawrence   Kong           |
|                                         |   | Chief   Financial Officer |

 

----
Editorial Note on Part 46
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 46 appear by T.D. ATF-457, 66 FR 32220, 32221, June 14, 2001.

§ 46.233 Payment of floor stocks tax. ( a ) *Electronic funds transfer.* If the dealer pays any other excise taxes collected by TTB by electronic funds transfer, then the dealer must also send the payment for the floor stocks tax by an electronic funds transfer. Other dealers may voluntarily elect to pay the floor stocks tax by electronic funds transfer. Electronic funds transfers of floor stocks tax must be received on or before July 31, 2009.
( b ) *Check or money order.* Dealers not paying floor stocks tax by electronic fund transfer must pay by a check or money order sent with Form 5000.28T09.
Exhibit








EXHIBIT 10.3
November 5, 2018 


RE: Your Transition from Juniper 


Dear Terry, 


This letter (this “Letter”) amends that certain letter, dated May 24, 2018 (the “Original Letter”), entered into between Juniper Networks, Inc. (“Juniper”) and Terrance Spidell (“you”).


Amendment:  The second paragraph of the Original Letter is hereby amended in its entirety and replaced with the following:


“Your full-time employment with Juniper will end on the business day immediately following the date that Juniper’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year 2018 is filed with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (such date, the “Termination Date”).”


Miscellaneous Items: You and Juniper acknowledge that each party to this letter has either been represented by independent legal counsel or has waived such party’s right to obtain advice of independent legal counsel in connection with entering into this letter. This letter may be executed in any number of counterparts, each of which shall be enforceable against the parties actually executing such counterparts, and all of which together shall constitute one instrument. A PDF, facsimile or other reproduction of this letter may be executed by one or more parties hereto and delivered by such party by facsimile or any similar electronic transmission device.  This Letter and the Original Letter represent the entire agreement about this subject matter and supersede prior negotiations or agreements. All prior agreements, understandings, representations, warranties, and negotiations between the parties about the subject matter of this Letter and the Original Letter merge into this Letter and the Original Letter. To the extent of any conflict between the provisions of this Letter and those of the Original Letter as heretofore in effect, this Letter shall control and otherwise govern and supersede such provisions.  






Signature: /s/ Terrance Spidell
Print Name: Terrance Spidell




Juniper Networks, Inc.




By: /s/ Brian M. Martin
Name: Brian M. Martin
Title: Senior Vice President and General Counsel
#### § 216.50 General.

The Railroad Retirement Act provides annuities for the spouse, and divorced spouse, of an employee who is entitled to an employee annuity. A spouse may receive an annuity based on age, or on having a child of the employee in his or her care. A divorced spouse may only receive an annuity based on age. No spouse or divorced spouse annuity may be paid based upon disability.
Request for Information Tilt Media Inc. (FAA-2015-3327) 

9-AWA-AVS-333Exemptions (FAA) 

Dear Mr. Rubasch: 

This letter is to inform you that the following information is missing from your petition (Docket No. FAA-2015-3327).

This information is necessary for the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) to process your petition.

Sent: Tuesday, December 01, 2015 7:27 AM 

To: rjr@tiltmedia.com

z Provide a copy of the Motion Picture and Television Operations Manual (MPTOM) which is required by Order 

8900.1, Volume 3, Chapter 8, Section 1. If you wish for us to proceed without this manual and remove closedset filming from your proposed operation please inform of us of your intention by the requested response date 

listed below.

Please submit the additional information (non-proprietary) to your docket at www.regulations.gov. Once your 

information has been submitted, please also send a copy of the requested information (and any proprietary 

information), as well as your comment tracking number from regulations.gov via e-mail to 333exemptions@faa.gov. If

you want us to process your request any further, we must receive the information described above by December 15, 

2015. If we do not receive the information, we will close the docket without notifying you further.

If you have any questions, please feel free to contact me at (202) 267-2999.

FAA Office of Rulemaking
IIB 

114TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 3866 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

APRIL 19, 2016 

Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Homeland Security and 

Governmental Affairs 

AN ACT 

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service 

located at 1265 Hurffville Road in Deptford Township, 

New Jersey, as the ‘‘First Lieutenant Salvatore S. 

Corma II Post Office Building’’. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 


sradovich on DSK3TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

HR 3866 RFS 

1 SECTION 1. FIRST LIEUTENANT SALVATORE S. CORMA II 

2 POST OFFICE BUILDING. 

3 (a) DESIGNATION.—The facility of the United States 

4 Postal Service located 1265 Hurffville Road in Deptford 

5 Township, New Jersey, shall be known and designated as 

6 the ‘‘First Lieutenant Salvatore S. Corma II Post Office 

7 Building’’. 

8 (b) REFERENCES.—Any reference in a law, map, reg9 ulation, document, paper, or other record of the United 

10 States to the facility referred to in subsection (a) shall 

11 be deemed to be a reference to the ‘‘First Lieutenant 

12 Salvatore S. Corma II Post Office Building’’. 

Passed the House of Representatives April 18, 2016. 

Attest: KAREN L. HAAS, 

Clerk. 


sradovich on DSK3TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
<PAGE>
                                                                   EXHIBIT 32.1

                           SECTION 906 CERTIFICATION

        CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 1350 OF CHAPTER 63 OF TITLE 18
                           OF THE UNITED STATES CODE

     I, C. Robert Henrikson, the Chief Executive Officer of The Travelers
Insurance Company (the "Company"), certify that (i) the Company's Quarterly
Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2005 (the "Form 10-Q")
fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934 and (ii) the information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly
presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
operations of the Company.


Date: November 18, 2005

                                          By: /s/ C. Robert Henrikson
                                              ---------------------------------
                                                    C. Robert Henrikson
                                                  Chairman, President and
                                                  Chief Executive Officer













     A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has
been provided to The Travelers Insurance Company and will be retained by The
Travelers Insurance Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange
Commission or its staff upon request.
#### § 261.11 Discretion of the three-member Board to reopen or not to reopen a final decision.

In any case in which the three-member Board may deem proper, the Board may direct that any decision, which is otherwise subject to reopening under this part, shall not be reopened or direct that any decision, which is otherwise not subject to reopening under this part, shall be reopened.
###### Editorial Note on Part 26

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 26 appear by T.D. ATF-451, 66 FR 21668, 21669, May 1, 2001.

#### § 26.201b [Reserved]
#### § 30.610 Are payments to a covered Part B employee, a covered Part E employee or an eligible surviving beneficiary as a result of an insurance policy which the employee or eligible surviving beneficiary has purchased a recovery that must be reported to OWCP?

Since payments received by a covered Part B employee, a covered Part E employee or an eligible surviving beneficiary pursuant to an insurance policy purchased by someone other than a liable third party are not payments in satisfaction of liability for causing an occupational illness or covered illness compensable under the Act, they are not considered a recovery that must be reported to OWCP.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY HIGH

 16,356

 18,293

 18,220

 19,087

 26,306

 23,880

 18,419

 16,701

 16,817

 13,317

 11,367

 10,709

 10,668

 14,022

 17,122

 17,560

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 473

 426

 875

 2,730

 4,568

 4,126

 6,242

 6,511

 7,141

 7,485

 8,713

 10,937

 10,580

 8,172

 7,927

 7,619

 5,858

 3,998

 3,868

 2,836

 2,738

 4,896

 7,369

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 308

 292

 282

 280

 295

 291

 302

 10,793

 12,360

 13,033

 14,330

 17,212

 17,364

 14,980

 13,375

 13,354

 9,971

 8,108

 7,146

 6,025

 6,604

 9,007

 12,099

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 373

 338

 391

 640

 1,170

 1,403

 2,014

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

JANUARY 2019 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: February 11, 2019

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

PORT CHICAGO TOP IN SUISUN BAY