alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

AND CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Report of Cascade Technologies Corp. (the Company) on Form 10KSB for the year ended August 31, 2007, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Periodic Report), I, Bruce Hollingshead, Chief Executive Officer and I, Christine Thomas, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



1.

the Periodic Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



2.

the information contained in the Periodic Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.







Dated:

November 29, 2007

/s/ Bruce Hollingshead

Bruce Hollingshead, CEO



/s/ Christine Thomas

Christine Thomas, CFO
**EXHIBIT 99.13**

 

**CONSENT OF GARY SIMMERMAN**

United States Securities and Exchange Commission

Gentlemen:

In connection with Silver Wheaton Corporation’s (the “Company”) Annual Report on Form 40-F for the year ended December 31, 2008 (the “Annual Report”), I, Gary Simmerman, AusIMM, Vice President Engineering and Mine Manager (Mercator Minerals), hereby consent to the inclusion in, or incorporation by reference into, and the use of my name in connection with the preparation            of the following documents/reports:

 

| 1.     | Reserve and resource estimates of the Mineral Park Mine; |
|--------|----------------------------------------------------------|
|   |                                                     |
| 2.     | The Annual Report.                                       |

 

Date: March 30, 2009

|   | /s/ Gary Simmerman                                                                                                                                                                                          |
|--------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   | Name: Gary Simmerman, AusIMMTitle:    Vice President Engineering and Mine Manager,              Mercator Minerals |
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Harry Rosen, Appellant.

Judgment affirmed. No opinion. Present — Dore, J. P., Cohn, Callahan, Van Voorhis and Shientag, JJ.; Shientag, J., dissents and votes to reverse the judgment and dismiss the information on the ground that the guilt of the defendant was not established beyond a reasonable doubt.
EXHIBIT 3.38
 LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY AGREEMENT
OF
LAWTON HOLDINGS LLC
   ARTICLE I
 OFFICES
   ARTICLE II
 MEMBERS




---



##### 



2




---



##### 



ARTICLE III
 MANAGERS
       3




---



##### 



4




---



##### 



ARTICLE IV
 OFFICERS
    5




---



##### 



6




---



##### 



ARTICLE V
 CONTRACTS, LOANS, CHECKS AND DEPOSITS
  7




---



##### 



ARTICLE VI
 TRANSFER OF PERCENTAGE OWNERSHIP
  ARTICLE VII
 FISCAL YEAR
  ARTICLE VIII
 DISTRIBUTIONS
  ARTICLE IX
 SEAL
  8




---



##### 



ARTICLE X
 WAIVER OF NOTICE
  ARTICLE XI
 INDEMNIFICATION OF OFFICERS AND MANAGERS
  ARTICLE XII
 AMENDMENTS
  9




---



##### 



CAPELLA HEALTHCARE, INCSole MemberBy:
    
    /s/ Howard T. Wall, IIIName:
    
    Howard T. Wall, IIITitle:
    
    Vice President & Secretary
 10
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY HIGH

 18,462

 19,628

 21,726

 20,488

 19,036

 15,930

 15,228

 13,503

 10,710

 10,578

 14,190

 10,957

 7,831

 4,779

 4,607

 5,786

 1,904

 1,105

 819

 698

 688

 599

 562

 480

 446

 426

 427

 360

 350

 377

 402

 10,517

 8,612

 12,557

 9,635

 8,748

 7,163

 5,582

 4,461

 3,614

 2,851

 3,543

 4,449

 2,233

 1,125

 773

 535

 589

 515

 382

 418

 487

 427

 422

 347

 313

 297

 304

 300

 286

 290

 292

 14,296

 14,429

 16,354

 15,094

 13,567

 11,583

 9,359

 8,126

 6,992

 6,656

 9,318

 7,355

 4,160

 2,187

 1,770

 1,639

 1,016

 726

 632

 573

 551

 499

 475

 431

 378

 351

 352

 329

 314

 313

 319

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

DECEMBER 2014 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: January 6, 2015

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

PITTSBURG BOTTOM ON THE SACRAMENTO RIVER
**Exhibit
      32.2**





**CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO**


**18
      U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**


**AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**


**SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**





In
      connection with the Annual Report of SRKP 2, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-KSB
      for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2007 as filed with the Securities and
      Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Anthony C.
      Pintsopoulos, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant
      to
      ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:





(1)
      The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)
      The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





/s/
                Anthony C. PintsopoulosAnthony
                C. PintsopoulosPrincipal
                Financial OfficerJuly 30, 2008
Office of Mobile Sources

EPA420-S-99-007

December 1999

Model-Year Exemption Policy

Is it legal for states to exempt new cars?

& Yes. EPA fulfilled its statutory requirement in this regard by designing performance

standards that addressed the minimum elements outlined in the Clean Air Act. Provided a

state designs a program which gets the same or better emission reductions as the

performance standard (and includes those elements which are statutorily required), it is

approvable.

& Since model year coverage is not statutorily defined, Section 51.356 (Vehicle Coverage)

of the 1992 I/M rule states: "Special exemption may be permitted for certain subject

vehicles provided a demonstration is made that the performance standard will be met."

All model year exemptions are covered by this provision.

What is our policy?

& Other than the above, little formal policy exists on this issue, since the number of model

years that can be exempted varies considerably depending on the age mix of the local

fleet (for example, a fleet where older vehicles predominate -- like California -- can

exempt more of the newer model years while losing relatively little in the way of

emission reductions).

& While it is neither policy nor a regulation, the MOBILE5 model automatically assumes

that vehicles are not tested (i.e., are exempt) until they are one year old. For biennial

programs, we've generally assumed that vehicles get their first test when they are two

years old (though there is no explicit requirement that this be the case).

& There is no I/M regulatory language that specifically recommends exempting vehicles for

two or more years. Unfortunately, in the preamble to the I/M OBD rule, a citation is

given to the 1992 rule which suggests that such regulatory language exists. This citation

is in error.

What have we recommended to states generally?

& When asked for guidance on the issue, we've generally told states that they can exempt as

many model years as they want -- provided they can still meet the relevant performance

standard.
& Historically, OMS has been a bit hesitant to recommend the exemption of new model

years beyond one year since this can deprive vehicle owners' of the opportunity to get

I/M repairs under the two-year warranty.

What have we said to specific states?

& The first serious discussion of exempting vehicles four or more years old since

promulgation of the 1992 rule occurred during EPA's discussions with California in late

1993/early 1994 regarding acceptable alternative program designs.

& Using California's age mix (which has a proportionally smaller number of new vehicles

because of the car-friendly climate), we showed that they could exempt vehicles up to

four years old without having a significant impact on their emissions reductions.

& During discussions with New Jersey in late 1994/early 1995, the possibility of exempting

vehicles anywhere from four to six years old was discussed. However, New Jersey

decided to adopt a hybrid program and require these newer vehicles to be tested as part of

a test-and-repair program component.
Exhibit 99.7







CONSENT OF V. SPRING



I hereby consent to the use of my name in connection with the following reports and documents, which are being filed as exhibits to and incorporated by reference into the registration statement on Form 40-F of Silver Wheaton Corp. (the Company) being filed with the United States Securities and Exchange Commission:



1.

The technical report dated March 9, 2005, entitled An Audit of the Mineral Reserves/Resources for Tayolita, Santa Rita, San Antonio, and San Martin Mines (the Tayolita Report);



2.

The technical report dated April 10, 2006 entitled A Technical Review on the Yauliyacu Lead/Zinc Mine, Junin Province, Peru for Silver Wheaton Corp (the Yauliyacu Report); and



3.

The annual information form of the Company dated March 23, 2007, which includes reference to my name in connection with information relating to the Tayoltita and Yauliyacu Reports, and the properties described therein and with regard to information on the San Dimas mines.



March 23, 2007



/s/ V. Spring

V. Spring
Bureau of Labor Statistics

**Series Id:**

**Series title: Labor force status:**  **Type of data: Age:**  **Years:**

**Year Jan**  **Feb Mar**  **Apr May**  **Jun Jul**  **Aug Sep**  **Oct Nov**  **Dec 2001**  79958013 7974 7973 7973 7962 8023 8010 8027 80358127 8125 **2002** 8141 8128 8137 8149 8121 8091 8084 8090 8087 8064 8057 8036 **2003** 8481 8470 8439 8414 8516 8553 8587 8576 8612 8644 8764 8676 **2004** 8630 8668 85958717 8589 8482 8384 8207 8452 8620 8792 8756 **2005** 8866 8866 8690 8670 8573 8523 8531 85958870 8951 9109 9094 **2006** 8971 9099 9016 8969 9012 8916 8826 8938 92559419 9329 9314 **2007** 9256 9151 9163 92459291 9189 9124 91959269 9309 9310 9160 **2008** 9203 9096 9208 9128 8881 9000 8958 9054 9249 9279 9368 9171 **2009** 89558964 8952 90358970 8949 8789 8876 8959 8941 8990 8944 **2010** 8953 8931 8821 8858 8954 8863 8628 8879 916591759097 8998 **2011** 8928 8884 8787 8722 Civilian noninstitutional population Number in thousands 16 to 17 years 2001 to 2011 

### Labor Force Statistics from the Current Population Survey **Original Data Value**

LNU00000086 **Not Seasonally Adjusted** (Unadj) Population Level - 16-17 yrs.

Source: Bureau of Labor Statistics Generated on: May 24, 2011 (01:52:52 PM)Bureau of Labor Statistics

**Annual** 8020 8099 8561 8574 8778 9089 9222 9133 8944 8943

Source: Bureau of Labor Statistics Generated on: May 24, 2011 (01:52:52 PM)
§ 255.18 Compromise of overpayments. ( a ) This section sets forth the principal standards which the Board applies in exercising its authority under 31 U.S.C. 3711 to compromise an overpayment. In addition, the Board may compromise an overpayment under the Federal Claims Collection Standards set forth in 4 CFR part 103.
( b ) An overpayment may be compromised only if it is in the best interest of the agency. Circumstances and factors to be considered are: ( 1 ) The overpayment cannot be collected because of the overpaid individual's inability to pay the full amount of the overpayment within a reasonable time;
( 2 ) The overpaid individual refuses to pay the overpayment in full and it appears that enforced collection procedures will take an inordinate amount of time or that the cost of collecting does not justify the enforced collection of the full amount; or
( 3 ) There is doubt that the Board could prove its case in court for the full amount claimed because of a bona fide dispute as to the facts or because of the legal issues involved.
EXHIBIT 32.1
                                                                    ------------



             CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SS.1350, AS ADOPTED
              PURSUANT TO SS.906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

       In connection with the quarterly report of Spire Corporation (the
"Company") on Form 10-QSB (the "Report") for the period ended March 31, 2004 as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, I, Roger
G. Little, Chairman of the Board, Chief Executive Officer and President of the
Board of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss.1350, as adopted
pursuant to ss.906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

       1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

       2. The information contained in the report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.



Dated:   May 14, 2004                       By: /s/ Roger G. Little
                                                -------------------------------
                                                Roger G. Little
                                                Chairman of the Board, Chief
                                                Executive Officer and President



       A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or
other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the
signatures that appear in typed form within the electronic version of this
written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to the Company and
will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange
Commission or its staff upon request.
§ 266.10 Use of benefit payments. ( a ) *Current maintenance.* Payments made to an individual as representative payee on behalf of an annuitant shall be considered as having been applied for the use and benefit of the annuitant when they are used for the annuitant's current maintenance. Current maintenance includes costs incurred in obtaining food, shelter, clothing, medical care, and personal comfort items. Example: An aged annuitant is entitled to a monthly railroad retirement benefit of $800. His son, who is his representative payee, disburses his benefits in the following manner: Rent and utilities$500 Medical50 Food80 Clothing(coat)90 Savings60 Miscellaneous20 The above expenditures would represent proper disbursements on behalf of the annuitant.
( b ) *Institutional care.* If an annuitant is receiving care in a Federal, state, or private institution because of mental or physical incapacity, current maintenance includes the customary charges made by the institution in providing care and maintenance, as well as expenditures for those items which will aid in the annuitant's recovery or release from the institution or expenses for personal needs which will improve the annuitant's conditions while in the institution.
( c ) *Support of legal dependents.* If the current maintenance needs of the annuitant are met, the representative payee may use part of the payments for the support of the annuitant's legally dependent spouse, child, and/or parent.
( d ) *Claims of creditors.* Where a debt arose prior to the first month for which benefits are certified to a representative payee, the representative payee may satisfy such debt out of present benefit payments only if the current and reasonably foreseeable needs of the annuitant are met. Example: A retroactive railroad retirement annuity check in the amount of $2,100, representing benefits due for November 1989 through January 1990, was issued on behalf of the annuitant to the annuitant's daughter, who is the representative payee. The check was certified in February 1990. The nursing home, where the annuitant resides, is owed money for maintenance expenses the annuitant incurred prior to February 1990.
If the accrual is not required for the annuitant's current maintenance and the annuitant had no foreseeable needs which would require large disbursements, the expenditure of the accrual or part thereof for the past due maintenance charges would be consistent with the Board's guidelines.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

DAY HIGH

 8,350

 8,701

 8,967

 9,149

 10,417

 9,956

 10,391

 10,554

 9,124

 8,378

 8,231

 6,473

 5,901

 6,581

 8,329

 10,399

 12,243

 12,763

 13,761

 14,788

 15,424

 15,417

 16,101

 13,072

 14,052

 12,157

 10,912

 10,475

 10,482

 10,935

 2,551

 2,473

 2,189

 1,988

 1,961

 1,610

 1,492

 1,936

 1,689

 1,593

 1,491

 1,350

 1,056

 1,400

 2,426

 3,491

 3,844

 3,668

 3,554

 3,743

 4,044

 3,965

 4,584

 4,129

 3,840

 3,550

 3,477

 3,263

 3,267

 3,607

 4,700

 4,628

 4,282

 4,480

 4,875

 4,675

 4,608

 5,061

 4,772

 4,368

 4,371

 4,015

 3,293

 3,871

 5,003

 6,157

 6,811

 7,247

 7,631

 8,343

 8,614

 8,791

 9,175

 8,082

 8,139

 7,383

 7,225

 6,297

 6,119

 6,279

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

JUNE 2001 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: July 18, 2001

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

PITTSBURG BOTTOM ON THE SACRAMENTO RIVER
**EXHIBIT32.1**

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO**

**18            USC, SECTION 1350,**

**AS            ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

In connection with the annual report of Northern Ethanol, Inc. (the            “Company”) on Form 10-KSB for the year ended December 31, 2007, as filed            with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the            “Report”), I, the undersigned, in the capacity and on the date indicated            below, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906            of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:

 

|   | 1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Rule                            13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|--------|----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

|   | 2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents,                            in all material respects, the financial condition and results of                            operations of the Company. |
|--------|----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

 

| Dated: April 16, 2008 | s/Gordon Laschinger 

Gordon Laschinger, Chief Executive Officer |
|-----------------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------|
#### § 404.1093 Possession of the United States.

In using the exclusions from gross income provided under section 931 of the Code (relating to income from sources within possessions of the United States) and section 932 of the Code (relating to citizens of possessions of the United States) for purposes of figuring your net earnings from self-employment, the term *possession of the United States* shall be deemed not to include the Virgin Islands, Guam, the Commonwealth of the Northern Mariana Islands, or American Samoa.

[45 FR 20075, Mar. 27, 1980, as amended at 69 FR 51556, Aug. 20, 2004]
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

DAY HIGH

 729

 866

 778

 805

 756

 749

 751

 750

 758

 784

 828

 823

 803

 756

 747

 775

 703

 752

 770

 735

 667

 650

 672

 687

 716

 721

 783

 735

 743

 683

 536

 539

 534

 542

 586

 645

 634

 619

 599

 686

 708

 616

 619

 573

 551

 593

 590

 668

 674

 643

 611

 575

 588

 576

 637

 631

 646

 641

 596

 513

 577

 660

 611

 653

 662

 704

 685

 688

 671

 722

 729

 687

 686

 648

 643

 674

 653

 708

 721

 685

 634

 613

 611

 619

 690

 675

 713

 708

 642

 572

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

APRIL 2022 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: May 2, 2022

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

DELTA MENDOTA CANAL AT CHECK 13 (O'NEILL)
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

DAY HIGH

 173

 166

 162

 160

 163

 172

 2,080

 207

 185

 181

 195

 186

 183

 173

 161

 155

 163

 153

 148

 150

 151

 138

 136

 137

 145

 175

 156

 162

 163

 144

 134

 149

 148

 152

 153

 157

 172

 164

 161

 166

 169

 157

 153

 152

 146

 143

 142

 136

 135

 141

 129

 124

 123

 124

 125

 133

 130

 124

 123

 120

 150

 153

 154

 156

 157

 163

 423

 186

 174

 174

 179

 168

 163

 158

 150

 148

 150

 143

 142

 145

 140

 132

 128

 130

 135

 146

 139

 135

 132

 126

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

APRIL 2017 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: May 3, 2017

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

PORT CHICAGO TOP IN SUISUN BAY