alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Securities and Exchange Commission

Notice is hereby given, pursuant to the provisions of the Government in the Sunshine Act, Public Law 94-409, that the Securities and Exchange Commission will hold a Closed Meeting on Thursday, April 14, 2011 at 2 p.m.

Commissioners, Counsel to the Commissioners, the Secretary to the Commission, and recording secretaries will attend the Closed Meeting. Certain staff members who have an interest in the matters also may be present.

The General Counsel of the Commission, or his designee, has certified that, in his opinion, one or more of the exemptions set forth in 5 U.S.C. 552b(c)(3), (5), (7), 9(B) and (10) and 17 CFR 200.402(a)(3), (5), (7), 9(ii) and (10), permit consideration of the scheduled matters at the Closed Meeting.

Commissioner Paredes, as duty officer, voted to consider the items listed for the Closed Meeting in a closed session.

The subject matter of the Closed Meeting scheduled for Thursday, April 14, 2011 will be:

Institution and settlement of injunctive actions;

Institution and settlement of administrative proceedings; and 

Other matters relating to enforcement proceedings.

At times, changes in Commission priorities require alterations in the scheduling of meeting items.

                    For further information and to ascertain what, if any, matters have been                           ( print page 20054)                        added, deleted or postponed, please contact:                

The Office of the Secretary at (202) 551-5400.

Dated: April 7, 2011.

Elizabeth M. Murphy, 

Secretary.

[FR Doc. 2011-8670 Filed 4-7-11; 11:15 am]

BILLING CODE 8011-01-P
#### Clinton Joseph SLONE, Plaintiff—Appellant, v. Dora B. SCHRIRO, sued in her individual & official capacity; et al., Defendants—Appellees.

No. 06-15711.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted July 17, 2006.*

Decided July 21, 2006.

Clinton Joseph Slone, Winslow, AZ, pro se.

Paul Edward Carter, Esq., AGAZ — Office of the Arizona Attorney General, Lia*559bility Management Section, Tucson, AZ, for Defendants-Appellees.

Before: B. FLETCHER, HAWKINS and THOMAS, Circuit Judges.

*

 This panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. *See*Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

MEMORANDUM **

This appeal from the district court’s order denying appellant’s motion for preliminary injunction comes to us for review under Ninth Circuit Rule 3-3. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1292(a)(1), and we affirm.

We express no view on the merits of the complaint. Our sole inquiry is whether the district court abused its discretion in denying preliminary injunctive relief. *See Gregorio T. v. Wilson,*59 F.3d 1002, 1004-05 (9th Cir.1995). The record before us shows that the court did not rely on an erroneous legal premise or abuse its discretion in concluding that appellant had failed to demonstrate a likelihood of success on the merits or the threat of imminent irreparable harm and in denying preliminary injunctive relief. *See id.*The court’s factual findings and application of legal standards are not clearly erroneous. *See id.*Accordingly, the court’s order denying the preliminary injunction is affirmed. All pending motions are denied.

AFFIRMED.

**

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA 

DA 22-0336 

IN THE MATTER OF THE ESTATES OF 

MARY JOE FOX and MARK ROBERT FOX, 

JERRY O'NEIL, 

Appellant, 

v. 

JEAN FOX, Personally and as Personal 

Representative of the Estates, 

Appellee. 

CEC 2 0 2"22 

Pc w n 

c. n 0 

urt 

ORDER 

Jean Fox, Personal Representative of the Appellee Estates, rnoves to strike the 

revised opening brief filed by Appellant Jerry O'Neil, to dismiss this appeal, and to impose 

sanctions for bringing this appeal . In response, O'Neil contends that Fox's rnotion to strike 

should be struck from the record and that her motion is over-length, according to M. R. 

App. P. 16(3). 

O'Neil is appealing a Flathead County District Court Order that granted Fox's 

motion to remove O'Neil as personal representative of the Estates, and to consolidate the 

estate proceedings of her rnother and brother. In open court, O'Neil did not object to his 

removal as personal representative, and the District Court cited his lack of objection in 

granting the motion. However, O'Neil later filed a Motion for Reconsideration and Restore 

Personal Representative along with a brief that was deemed denied after sixty days. O'Neil 

submitted his opening brief that this Court returned because of several deficiencies. O'Neil 

re-submitted his opening brief on November 21, 2022, which was accepted for filing. 

Fox provides extensive history to these two estates to justify her request for 

dismissal, and contends O'Neil changed, added, or deleted content in his revised, opening 

brief, in contradiction to this Court's deficiency order, stating O'Neil "added at least one 

12/20/2022

Case Number: DA 22-0336
hundred twenty-three (123) new pages in exhi hits alone." She summarizes in paraphrasing 

Shakespeare, that O'Neil "is a poor player ho strutted and fretted his hour upon the state 

before the district court, yet rather than be heard no more. he chose a different state upon 

which to set forth his newly rewritten play, one in \vhich he hoped would be better 

received." 

Be that as it may, O'Neil's revised brief was accepted for filing when submitted 

and, consequently, we are not inclined to strike it. And while these probate matters seem 

acrimonious and protracted, we do not conclude that dismissal of the appeal or analysis of 

the merits for purposes of other sanctions is appropriate at this juncture. We will take up 

these issues upon analysis of the briefing. Further, we expect the parties to comply with 

the Rules in their filings and arguments, and to avoid excessiveness and dissipation of the 

Court's time and resources, and we will monitor the matter for compliance. Therefore, 

IT IS ORDERED that the Motion to Strike Pleading and Motion to Dismiss and For 

Sanctions is DENIED. 

The Clerk is directed to provide a copy of this Order to all parties. 

DATED this 2b f.)----clay of December, 2022. 

did AI .411 1".... 

Justices 

2
1

                                                                     EXHIBIT 11
                        BellSouth Corporation
                  Computation of Earnings Per Share

                                  For the Three Month   For the Nine Month
                                     Period Ended         Period Ended
                                      September 30,        September 30,
                                   1999       2000        1999      2000
Basic Earnings Per Common Share:

Net Income                         $994     $1,036       $2,395     $3,101

Weighted average shares
Outstanding                       1,885      1,871        1,903      1,878

Earnings Per Common Share         $ .53      $ .55        $1.26      $1.65


Diluted Earnings Per Common Share:

Net Income                        $ 994     $1,036       $2,395      $3,101

Weighted average shares
Outstanding                       1,885      1,871        1,903       1,878

Incremental shares from
assumed exercise of
stock options and payment of
performance share awards             19         14           18          16

Total Shares                      1,904      1,885        1,921       1,894

Earnings Per Common Share         $ .52       $.55       $ 1.25      $ 1.64
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY HIGH

 155

 141

 132

 130

 123

 124

 124

 123

 213

 150

 128

 129

 126

 121

 120

 116

 163

 193

 114

 115

 114

 116

 116

 113

 113

 112

 113

 115

 116

 120

 122

 130

 125

 126

 119

 117

 115

 117

 114

 116

 118

 118

 116

 109

 113

 109

 107

 105

 106

 107

 106

 109

 108

 98

 106

 102

 107

 108

 109

 109

 113

 115

 136

 133

 129

 124

 121

 121

 121

 119

 134

 128

 124

 124

 120

 117

 114

 113

 119

 117

 111

 111

 111

 113

 111

 110

 110

 110

 110

 112

 113

 116

 118

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

MAY 2006 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: June 5, 2006

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

PITTSBURG TOP ON THE SACRAMENTO RIVER
1 Pursuant to 5 TH C IR
. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be

published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR
. R. 47.5.4. IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 02-30570 Summary Calendar
GISCLAIR TOWING COMPANY, INC.,Plaintiff-Counter ClaimantAppellee-Cross-Appellant,

versus
MICHAEL MIRE, Defendant-Counter ClaimantAppellant-Cross-Appellee.

-------------------- Appeals from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Louisiana USDC No. 99-2347

-------------------- February 18, 2003 Before BARKSDALE, DEMOSS, and BENAVIDES, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: 1 Appellant, claiming to have been injured at sea during an accident, presents a variety of arguments asserting that the judgment of the district court should be reversed. After the conclusion of a bench trial, the district court found, inter alia , that (i) the evidence showed that appellant did not have an accident;No. 02-30570 -2- (ii) even if an accident occurred, there is no evidence, besides the testimony of appellant (whom the district court deemed non-credible) that the steps that allegedly caused the accident were unreasonably slippery; and (iii) even if appellant had an accident, the damages that were identified were sustained by incidents occurring and diagnosed years prior to the alleged accident. Appellant provides no persuasive argument that the district court’s findings of fact were clearly erroneous and, therefore, those findings must stand. See United States v. Chavez, 281 F.3d 479, 483 (5th Cir. 2002) (holding that a district court’s factual findings are reviewed for clear error ). These findings are dispositive of this appeal and render moot and irrelevant appellant Mire’s other attacks on the judgment of the district court. Accordingly, the judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY ELEVATION

 252.52

 252.61

 252.58

 252.56

 252.60

 252.61

 252.54

 252.48

 252.48

 252.52

 252.61

 252.57

 252.57

 252.56

 252.49

 252.54

 252.62

 252.52

 252.62

 252.56

 252.57

 252.57

 252.45

 252.49

 252.59

 252.55

 252.54

 252.62

 252.49

 252.51

 252.45

 3,933

 3,978

 3,963

 3,953

 3,973

 3,978

 3,943

 3,914

 3,914

 3,933

 3,978

 3,958

 3,958

 3,953

 3,919

 3,943

 3,983

 3,933

 3,983

 3,953

 3,958

 3,958

 3,899

 3,919

 3,968

 3,948

 3,943

 3,983

 3,919

 3,928

 3,899

STORAGE

+49

+45

-15

-10

+20

+5

-35

-29

+0

+19

+45

-20

+0

-5

-34

+24

+40

-50

+50

-30

+5

+0

-59

+20

+49

-20

-5

+40

-64

+9

-29

CHANGE

 808

 785

 694

 721

 738

 733

 694

 668

 455

 692

 652

 716

 481

 445

 486

 517

 513

 455

 486

 524

 516

 496

 493

 505

 551

 547

 550

 468

 492

 488

 364

 12,726

 12,630

 12,702

 12,870

 12,990

 13,110

 12,990

 12,870

 12,690

 12,330

 12,534

 12,426

 12,270

 12,630

 10,830

 10,950

 10,950

 9,750

 9,870

 9,870

 10,350

 9,750

 9,750

 8,670

 8,670

 8,670

 8,490

 8,430

 8,190

 8,430

 8,550

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

AUGUST 2007 RED BLUFF DIVERSION RESERVOIR DAILY OPERATIONS RUN DATE: October 17, 2007

IN LAKE

CANAL

 ACRE-FEET

TOTALS +15 17,733 337,938

ACRE-FEET +15 35,173 670,300

SUMMARY

RELEASE (ACRE-FEET)

TOTAL 709,694

 3,884

RELEASE

RIVER

CORNING TO SACTO

CANAL

RELEASE C.F.S.

TEHAMA

COLUSA

 88

 80

 113

 80

 65

 56

 66

 64

 70

 72

 58

 65

 64

 59

 80

 82

 61

 58

 62

 49

 71

 70

 81

 69

 59

 47

 47

 55

 70

 83

 84

 2,128

 4,221

CORNING CANAL 4,221

TEHAMA-COLUSA CANAL 35,173

TO SACTO RIVER 670,300

Table 9
#### § 225.1 Introduction.

This part discusses Primary Insurance Amount, which is referred to as PIA throughout this part, and which is an important element in the calculation of any retirement or survivor annuity. There are a number of PIA computations based on different periods, amounts, and types of earnings. However, the formulas for computing any PIA are prescribed in section 215 of the Social Security Act and are described in detail in the regulations of the Social Security Administration (20 CFR part 404, subpart C). This part discusses PIA computation formulas and relates them to the PIA's which the Board uses. Descriptions of the majority of PIA's used in computing retirement or survivor annuities under the Railroad Retirement Act are contained in this part. Explanations are included of when delayed retirement credits and cost-of-living increases can be added to the PIA's used by the Board. This part also explains when and how a PIA is recomputed or adjusted. Since these regulations are intended to address annuities currently being awarded, certain PIA's, not used in the computation of annuities awarded after August 13, 1981, are not included in these regulations. Parts 226, 228 and 229 of this chapter explain how PIA's are used in actual annuity computations.
**Exhibit 32(a)**

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 906**

**OF THESARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 (18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350)**

 

In connection with theQuarterly Report of PACCAR Financial Corp. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Qfor the quarter ended March 31, 2009 as filed with the Securities andExchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), the undersigned certify,  pursuant to section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. section 1350), that to the best of our knowledge and belief:

 

(1)          TheReport fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) ofthe Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2)          Theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

 
| Date   | May 6, 2009 |                           | By | /s/ Mark C. Pigott |
|--------|------------------|--------------------------------|----|--------------------|
|   |             | Mark C. Pigott                 |
|   |             | Chairman                       |
|   |             | PACCAR Financial Corp.         |
|   |             | (Principal Executive  Officer) |
|   |             |                           |
|   |             |                           |
|   | By               | /s/ Ronald E. Armstrong        |
|   |             | Ronald E. Armstrong            |
|   |             | Vice Chairman                  |
|   |             | PACCAR Financial Corp.         |
|   |             | (Principal Financial Officer)  |

 

A signed original of thiswritten statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Companyand will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities andExchange Commission or its staff upon request.

 

----
### Part E—Evaluation and State Plan Amendments
Electrical Conductivity, UMHOS

Day High Low Mean

1 0 0 0

2 0 0 0

3 0 0 0

4 0 0 0

5 0 0 0

6 0 0 0

7 0 0 0

8 0 0 0

9 0 0 0

10 0 0 0

11 0 0 0

12 0 0 0

13 0 0 0

14 0 0 0

15 0 0 0

16 0 0 0

17 0 0 0

18 0 0 0

19 0 0 0

20 0 0 0

21 0 0 0

22 0 0 0

23 0 0 0

24 0 0 0

25 0 0 0

26 0 0 0

27 0 0 0

28 0 0 0

29 0 0 0

30 0 0 0

COMMENT(S):

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

Historical Archive and Report Database

Pittsburg TopOn The Sacramento River

Period: June 2022 Run Date: 11/22/2022
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Defense

###### Office of the Secretary

# AGENCY:

Department of Defense.

# ACTION:

Notice of closed meetings.

# SUMMARY:

Pursuant to the provisions of section 10 of Public Law 92-463, the Federal Advisory Committee Act, notice is hereby given that closed meetings of the Department of Defense Wage Committee will be held on Tuesday, May 3, 2011, Tuesday, May 17, 2011, and Tuesday, May 31, 2011, at 10 a.m. at 1400 Key Boulevard, Level A, Room A101, Rosslyn, Virginia 22209.

Under the provisions of section 10(d) of Public Law 92-463, the Department of Defense has determined that the meetings meet the criteria to close meetings to the public because the matters to be considered are related to internal rules and practices of the Department of Defense and the detailed wage data to be considered were obtained from officials of private establishments with a guarantee that the data will be held in confidence.

However, members of the public who may wish to do so are invited to submit material in writing to the chairman concerning matters believed to be deserving of the Committee's attention.

Additional information concerning the meetings may be obtained by writing to the Chairman, Department of Defense Wage Committee, 4000 Defense Pentagon, Washington, DC 20301-4000.

Dated: April 12, 2011.

Morgan F. Park,

Alternate OSD Federal Register Liaison Officer, Department of Defense.

[FR Doc. 2011-9332 Filed 4-15-11; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 5001-06-P
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY HIGH

 14,662

 13,572

 14,275

 14,041

 12,380

 11,040

 11,177

 11,392

 13,124

 12,618

 12,739

 12,262

 14,157

 15,717

 17,028

 19,084

 19,056

 18,501

 20,858

 16,249

 15,277

 14,662

 14,223

 13,817

 14,321

 16,015

 14,435

 15,341

 13,302

 13,781

 12,307

 6,861

 6,397

 5,796

 5,914

 5,237

 4,285

 4,472

 4,576

 4,689

 4,921

 4,162

 5,475

 6,052

 4,306

 5,168

 7,435

 7,129

 8,104

 7,418

 7,752

 6,312

 5,460

 5,810

 5,951

 6,165

 6,633

 6,346

 4,765

 5,424

 4,793

 4,501

 9,989

 9,563

 9,674

 9,779

 8,694

 8,243

 8,318

 8,304

 8,247

 7,877

 7,485

 8,540

 9,073

 9,349

 10,590

 12,512

 12,381

 12,284

 13,400

 12,171

 10,575

 8,132

 9,473

 9,349

 9,638

 10,416

 9,609

 9,474

 8,657

 8,090

 7,840

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

OCTOBER 2004 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: November 4, 2004

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

PITTSBURG TOP ON THE SACRAMENTO RIVER
479 P.2d 774

#### TIMERON, North American Land Development, Inc., Robert H. Levenson, Johnny Mobley, Ray Brooks, and United States Leisure, Inc., Petitioners, v. The DISTRICT COURT OF LEA COUNTY, New Mexico, and Hon. Kermit E. Nash, Judge of the District Court of Lea County, New Mexico, Respondents.

No. 9202.

Supreme Court of New Mexico.

Jan. 25, 1971.

Original Prohibition Proceedings

Ordered that petition for writ of prohibition be and the same is hereby denied.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

DAY HIGH

 413

 384

 333

 315

 315

 317

 313

 305

 303

 305

 297

 292

 286

 278

 277

 272

 271

 279

 313

 543

 599

 578

 1,108

 3,793

 3,441

 4,333

 2,678

 1,125

 270

 306

 259

 283

 272

 273

 266

 275

 280

 282

 281

 269

 262

 264

 261

 263

 264

 264

 267

 268

 273

 284

 286

 374

 391

 406

 441

 416

 336

 326

 307

 297

 292

 288

 287

 288

 289

 292

 289

 278

 273

 269

 267

 267

 267

 269

 274

 303

 339

 343

 424

 1,166

 882

 1,168

 948

 632

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

FEBRUARY 2010 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: March 3, 2010

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

PITTSBURG TOP ON THE SACRAMENTO RIVER
Exhibit 32.1
                                  ------------

Certification pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley act of 2001.

      --------------------------------------------------------------------

In connection with the Annual Report of Coach Industries Group, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-KSB for the year ended December 31, 2003, as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
Francis O'Donnell, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to
18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2001, that:

The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Dated:  August 13, 2004

                                    /s/ Francis O'Donnell
                                    -------------------------------------------
                                    Francis O'Donnell, Chief Executive Officer