alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY HIGH

 205

 201

 195

 192

 213

 226

 190

 183

 179

 178

 184

 184

 180

 189

 188

 190

 192

 195

 196

 245

 244

 204

 200

 202

 203

 209

 241

 248

 219

 216

 214

 178

 183

 176

 163

 164

 165

 167

 163

 158

 159

 163

 153

 159

 160

 166

 169

 178

 184

 188

 190

 201

 196

 196

 198

 198

 201

 200

 203

 203

 203

 203

 197

 193

 187

 181

 178

 187

 178

 172

 170

 170

 174

 169

 172

 172

 176

 178

 183

 188

 191

 204

 211

 199

 198

 200

 200

 204

 211

 219

 209

 209

 208

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

MARCH 2019 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: April 8, 2019

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

PITTSBURG BOTTOM ON THE SACRAMENTO RIVER
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

DAY

 53,087

 55,188

 56,772

 56,851

 60,011

 61,173

 61,855

 62,388

 62,425

 61,900

 61,472

 61,751

 62,371

 63,451

 63,792

 63,892

 63,926

 64,056

 64,031

 64,056

 64,048

 63,943

 63,745

 63,481

 63,237

 63,435

 63,661

 63,871

 63,578

 63,460

 80,734

 81,964

 82,730

 83,350

 83,944

 84,969

 86,703

 88,003

 89,360

 90,808

 92,161

 92,647

 92,922

 92,992

 93,642

 94,556

 95,246

 95,880

 96,559

 97,313

 97,514

 97,450

 97,506

 97,636

 97,672

 97,428

 97,075

 96,653

 96,703

 96,810

STORAGE - A.F. 

 133,821

 137,152

 139,502

 140,201

 143,955

 146,142

 148,558

 150,391

 151,785

 152,708

 153,633

 154,398

 155,293

 156,443

 157,434

 158,448

 159,172

 159,936

 160,590

 161,369

 161,562

 161,393

 161,251

 161,117

 160,909

 160,863

 160,736

 160,524

 160,281

 160,270

1,094

1,297

1,336

1,324

1,391

1,083

633

824

722

710

839

840

852

834

749

656

849

859

935

980

843

1,153

938

984

1,078

886

868

849

798

854

3,112

2,976

2,521

1,676

3,284

2,186

1,851

1,748

1,425

1,175

1,305

1,226

1,303

1,414

1,249

1,167

1,214

1,244

1,265

1,373

940

1,068

866

916

973

863

804

742

675

848

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

JUNE 2002 FULL NATURAL FLOW AT NEW MELONES DAM RUN DATE: 07/12/2002

TOTALS +30,451 43,409

* October 1, 86,102

 591.7

 597.6

 602.6

 605.9

 612.4

 616.8

 620.4

 623.9

 626.7

 629.1

 631.6

 634.1

 636.7

 639.5

 641.9

 644.3

 646.7

 649.1

 651.6

 654.4

 656.2

 658.4

 660.1

 661.9

 663.8

 665.5

 667.1

 668.6

 669.9

 671.6

DONNELLS

RES

BEARDSLEY

RES

2001 TO DATE

NEW

MELONES

INFLOW

C.F.S

NATURAL

RIVER

C.F.S

ACCUM *

FULL

NATURAL

1000 A.F.

RESERVOIR

TOTAL

+4,002

+3,331

+2,350

+699

+3,754

+2,187

+2,416

+1,833

+1,394

+923

+925

+765

+895

+1,150

+991

+1,014

+724

+764

+654

+779

+193

-169

-142

-134

-208

-46

-127

-212

-243

-11

CHANGE

A.F. C.F.S.

+2,018

+1,679

+1,185

+352

+1,893

+1,103

+1,218

+924

+703

+465

+466

+386

+451

+580

+500

+511

+365

+385

+330

+393

+97

-85

-72

-68

-105

-23

-64

-107

-123

-6
§ 10.618 How is a review of the written record conducted? ( a ) The hearing representative will review the official record and any additional evidence submitted by the claimant and by the agency. The hearing representative may also conduct whatever investigation is deemed necessary. New evidence and arguments are to be submitted at any time up to the time specified by OWCP, but they should be submitted as soon as possible to avoid delaying the hearing process.
( b ) The claimant should submit, with his or her application for review, all evidence or argument that he or she wants to present to the hearing representative. If the claimant chooses to change the request from an oral hearing to a review of the written record, the claimant should submit all evidence or argument at that time. A copy of all pertinent material will be sent to the employer, which will have 20 days from the date it is sent to comment. (Medical evidence is not considered “pertinent” for review and comment by the agency, and it will therefore not be furnished to the agency. OWCP has sole responsibility for evaluating medical evidence.) The employer shall send any comments to OWCP and the claimant, who will have 20 more days from the date of the agency's certificate of service to comment.
[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 71 (Wednesday, April 13, 2011)]
[Notices]
[Page 20668]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2011-8784]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FARM CREDIT SYSTEM INSURANCE CORPORATION


Farm Credit System Insurance Corporation Board; Regular Meeting

AGENCY: Farm Credit System Insurance Corporation.

SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given of the regular meeting of the Farm 
Credit System Insurance Corporation Board (Board).

Date and Time: The meeting of the Board will be held at the offices of 
the Farm Credit Administration in McLean, Virginia, on April 14, 2011, 
from 1 p.m. until such time as the Board concludes its business.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Dale L. Aultman, Secretary to the Farm 
Credit System Insurance Corporation Board, (703) 883-4009, TTY (703) 
883-4056.

ADDRESSES: Farm Credit System Insurance Corporation, 1501 Farm Credit 
Drive, McLean, Virginia 22102.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Parts of this meeting of the Board will be 
open to the public (limited space available) and parts will be closed 
to the public. In order to increase the accessibility to Board 
meetings, persons requiring assistance should make arrangements in 
advance. The matters to be considered at the meeting are:

Open Session

A. Approval of Minutes

    <bullet> January 20, 2011.

B. Business Reports

    <bullet> FCSIC Financial Reports.
    <bullet> Report on Insured and Other Obligations.
    <bullet> Quarterly Report on Annual Performance Plan.

C. New Business

    <bullet> Presentation of 2010 Audits Results.

Closed Sesson

    <bullet> FCSIC Report on System Performance.

Executive Session

    <bullet> Executive Session of the FCSIC Board Audit Committee with 
the External Auditor.

    Dated: April 7, 2011.
Dale L. Aultman,
Secretary, Farm Credit System Insurance Corporation Board.
[FR Doc. 2011-8784 Filed 4-12-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6710-01-P
[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 75 (Tuesday, April 19, 2011)]
[Notices]
[Page 21916]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2011-9369]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE

Drug Enforcement Administration


Manufacturer of Controlled Substances; Notice of Application

    Pursuant to Sec.  1301.33(a) of Title 21 of the Code of Federal 
Regulations (CFR), this is notice that on September 16, 2010, 
Mallinckrodt, Inc., 3600 North Second Street, St. Louis, Missouri 
63147, made application by letter to the Drug Enforcement 
Administration (DEA) to be registered as a bulk manufacturer of 4-
Anilino-N-Phenethyl-4-Piperidine (ANPP)(8333), a basic class of 
controlled substance listed in schedule II.
    The company plans to use this controlled substance in the 
manufacture of another controlled substance.
    Any other such applicant, and any person who is presently 
registered with DEA to manufacture such substances, may file comments 
or objections to the issuance of the proposed registration pursuant to 
21 CFR 1301.33(a).
    Any such written comments or objections should be addressed, in 
quintuplicate, to the Drug Enforcement Administration, Office of 
Diversion Control, Federal Register Representative (ODL), 8701 
Morrissette Drive, Springfield, Virginia 22152; and must be filed no 
later than June 20, 2011.

    Dated: April 11, 2011.
Joseph T. Rannazzisi,
Deputy Assistant Administrator, Office of Diversion Control, Drug 
Enforcement Administration.
[FR Doc. 2011-9369 Filed 4-18-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4410-09-P
#### § 227.4 Reduction for employer pension.

(a) *General.* The supplemental annuity for each month is reduced by the amount of any private pension the employee is receiving for that month based on the contributions of a railroad employer. This reduction is applied to the supplemental annuity amount after any reduction for railroad retirement family maximum. Private pension is explained in § 216.14 of this chapter.

(b) *Private pension reduced for supplemental annuity.* If the employer reduces the private pension for the employee's entitlement to the supplemental annuity, the reduced pension amount is subtracted from the supplemental annuity. However, the reduction in the supplemental annuity can be no greater than the difference between the supplemental annuity amount, after any reduction for railroad retirement family maximum, and the amount the private pension is reduced for the supplemental annuity. This guarantees that the sum of the reduced supplemental annuity and the reduced employer pension is not less than the amount of the full employer pension.

# Example:

The full employer pension is $80. This is reduced by $35 because of the employee's entitlement to a supplemental annuity. The initial supplemental annuity rate is $43.

| Full employer pension | $80 |
| --- | --- |
| Reduction for supplemental annuity | −35 |
| Reduced pension amount | 45 |
| Supplemental annuity | 43 |
| Reduced pension amount | −45 |
| | 0 |
| Guarantee amount: | |
| Supplemental annuity | 43 |
| Reduction in private pension | −35 |
| | 8 |
| Supplemental annuity | 43 |
| Reduction in private pension | −8 |
| Reduced supplemental annuity | 35 |

The reduced supplemental annuity amount is $35. This amount plus the reduced employer pension of $45 equals $80, the full amount of the employer pension.

(c) *Part of private pension based on employee contributions.* If the employer pension is based on both employer and employee contributions, a special formula is used to determine the amount to be subtracted from the supplemental annuity. The Board first computes the pension amount the employee's contributions could have purchased from a private insurance company. That amount is subtracted from the total employer pension. The result is the pension amount used to reduce the supplemental annuity.
#### § 10.120 May a claimant submit additional evidence?

A claimant or a person acting on his or her behalf may submit to OWCP at any time any other evidence relevant to the claim.
Exhibit 5.3
 101 South Queen Street 
Martinsburg, West Virginia 25401
(304) 263-0836
7000 Hampton Center 
Morgantown, West Virginia 26505
(304) 285-2500
333 West Vine Street, Suite 1700
Lexington, Kentucky 40507-1639
(859) 252-2202
    
    (BOWLES RICE LOGO)
600 Quarrier Street
Charleston, West Virginia 25301
Post Office Box 1386
Charleston, West Virginia 25325-1386
(304) 347-1100
www.bowlesrice.com
    
    5th Floor, United Square
501 Avery Street
Parkersburg, West Virginia 26101
(304) 485-8500
480 West Jubal Early Drive
Suite 130
Winchester, Virginia 22601
(540) 723-8877
  Amy J. Tawney
    
    E-Mail Address:Telephone  (304) 347-1123
    
    atawney@bowlesrice.comFacsimile  (304) 343-3058
 
 Re:
    
    Exchange of 9.50% Senior Secured Notes Due 2016 ofMcJunkin Red Man Corporation
  WV Guarantors Issuer Exchange Notes Securities Act Outstanding Notes Notes Registration Statement Indenture




---



##### 








---



##### 








---



#####
From: "Rostker, David" <David_Rostker@omb.eop.gov> 

To: Paul Argyropoulos/DC/USEPA/US@EPA, Paul Machiele/AA/USEPA/US@EPA 

Date: 01/13/2010 01:13 PM 

Subject: Citations from FS 

- “...Therefore, much of the timber harvested today and stored as wood 

products will be completely oxidized 25 years from now...” 

 

Micales, J.A. and Skog, K.E.: 1997, ‘The decomposition of forest products 

in landfills’, Int. Biodet.Biodeg. 39(2), 145–158. 

PINGOUD, K, A.-L. PERÄLÄ and A. PUSSINEN. 2001. CARBON 

DYNAMICS IN WOOD PRODUCTS. Mitigation and Adaptation 

Strategies for Global Change 6: 91–111, Kluwer Academic Publishers. 

Printed in the Netherlands. 

 

Chapter 1. 

 

- This appears to be missing some key reference on sustainable forestry 

practices that are available... 

- And it would vary by forest type, soils and harvesting practice. 

- This section totally ignores the refereed literature from the Long Term Soil 

Productivity Study, e.g., Powers, R.F.; Scott, D.A.; Sanchez, F.; Voldseth, R.A.; 

Page-Dumroese, D.; Elioff, J.D.; Stone, D.M. 2005. The North American longterm soil productivity experiment: findings from the first decade of research. For. 

Ecol. Manage. 220: 31-50. 

 

Sanchez, F.G.; Tiarks, A.E.; Kranabetter, J.M.; Page-Dumroese, D.S.; Powers, 

R.F.; Sanborn, P.T.; Chapman, W.K. 2006. Effects of organic matter removal 

and soil compaction on fifth-year mineral soil carbon and nitrogen contents for 

sites across the United States and Canada. Can. J. For. Res. 36: 565-576. 

 

- This seems to be missing major references on sustainable forestry and 

biodiversity. 

There is a substantial refereed literature on biodiversity in intensively managed 

forests and landscapes that has bearing on these questions. It was apparently not 

used, e.g. 

T.B. WIGLEY AND T. H. ROBERTS. 1994. Forest management and wildlife in 

forested wetlands of the southern Appalachians. Water, Air and Soil Pollution 77: 

445--456. 

 

Zobrist, K.W.; T. M. Hinckley; M.G. Andreu. A literature review of management 

practices to support increased biodiversity in intensively managed loblolly pine 

plantations. Final Technical Report to the National Commission on Science for 

Sustainable Forestry (NCSSF). July 31, 2005. 16 p. 

 

 
- See the Western Biofuels Assessment available on the Western Governor’s 

Association Web site that looked at feedstock availability and cost needed to feed 

expected size of biorefineries. Transportation Fuels web link 

http://www.westgov.org/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=126&

Itemid=67 

A similar analysis nationally is nearly complete. 

 

 

David Rostker 

OMB/OIRA 

drostker@omb.eop.gov
#### § 209.7 Employers' supplemental reports of service.

Each employer shall furnish the Board a report of the current year service of each employee who ceases work for the purpose of retiring under the provisions of the Railroad Retirement Act.

(Approved by the Office of Management and Budget under control number 3220-0005)

[63 FR 32613, June 15, 1998]
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

DAY HIGH

 15,574

 16,901

 17,884

 18,584

 17,840

 17,126

 16,528

 15,288

 14,042

 15,159

 15,856

 16,220

 15,812

 15,355

 14,305

 10,048

 7,130

 5,583

 5,344

 5,328

 5,546

 4,244

 3,966

 4,117

 4,065

 4,708

 6,690

 5,868

 5,753

 5,572

 4,921

 5,097

 5,555

 5,982

 6,138

 6,351

 6,322

 6,199

 5,869

 6,013

 5,992

 6,404

 6,379

 6,009

 5,286

 3,460

 2,481

 2,171

 2,065

 2,195

 2,385

 2,220

 2,017

 1,933

 1,889

 2,074

 2,551

 2,280

 1,860

 1,782

 9,913

 10,448

 11,408

 11,360

 11,159

 11,190

 10,876

 10,202

 9,911

 9,954

 10,355

 10,602

 10,581

 10,052

 8,648

 5,769

 4,331

 3,658

 3,576

 3,675

 3,744

 3,197

 2,997

 2,878

 2,815

 3,366

 4,181

 3,779

 3,757

 3,593

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

SEPTEMBER 2002 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: October 9, 2002

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

PITTSBURG BOTTOM ON THE SACRAMENTO RIVER
<PAGE>


                                                                    EXHIBIT 11
                                                                    ----------
                    PACIFIC TELESIS GROUP AND SUBSIDIARIES
                   COMPUTATION OF EARNINGS (LOSS) PER SHARE
     (Dollars in millions, except per share amounts; shares in thousands)

                            For the 3 Months Ended  For the 9 Months Ended 
                               September 30,            September 30,      
                            ----------------------  -----------------------
                                  1996        1995         1996       1995
                            ----------------------  -----------------------
Net income (loss)            $     286    $ (3,085)     $   865   $ (2,543)
                              ========    ========      =======   ========
Weighted average number
  of common shares
  outstanding ...........      428,362     427,421      428,411    425,184

Common stock equivalent
  shares applicable to
  stock options..........        1,743         376        1,301        429
                              --------    --------      -------   --------
Total number of shares 
  for computing primary
  earnings (loss) per share    430,105     427,797      429,712    425,613

Incremental shares for
  computing fully diluted
  earnings (loss) per share          4         202          446        149
                              --------    --------      -------   --------
Total number of shares
  for computing fully
  diluted earnings 
  (loss) per share.........    430,109     427,999      430,158    425,762
                              ========    ========     ========   ========
Earnings (loss) per common
  share (as reported)......   $   0.67     $ (7.22)    $   2.02   $  (5.98)
Primary earnings (loss)
  per share................   $   0.66     $ (7.21)    $   2.01   $  (5.97)
Fully diluted earnings
  (loss) per share.........   $   0.66     $ (7.21)    $   2.01   $  (5.97)

Earnings (loss) per share amounts for  the three- and nine-month periods ended
September  30,  1996  and 1995,  as  reported  in  the Condensed  Consolidated
Statements of  Income, were based  on the  weighted average  number of  common
shares  outstanding for  the respective  periods.   Primary and  fully diluted
earnings  per share  amounts  were not  shown  in the  Condensed  Consolidated
Statements of  Income, as  they differ  from the  reported earnings per  share
amounts by less than three percent.
Order entered February 21, 2014

In The

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-13-01214-CR

AKEASHYA K. THOMAS, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the Auxiliary Court No. 4B

Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. TR-13-22742

ORDER

The Court REINSTATES the appeal.

On January 21, 2014, we ordered the trial court to make findings regarding why the 

reporter’s record has not been filed. We ADOPT the findings that: (1) appellant was convicted 

of a Class C misdemeanor and is not entitled to court-appointed counsel; (2) appellant signed a 

form entitled “waiver and explanation of rights”; (3) appellant waived the recording of the 

proceedings; (4) appellant filed a notice of appeal, but did not respond to the letter from the 

Truancy Court regarding whether she desired to continue the appeal; and (5) no affidavit of 

indigence was filed by appellant. We note that appellant, who is representing herself in this 

appeal, has not communicated with the Court regarding the appeal.
Accordingly, we ORDER appellant to file her brief by MARCH 31, 2014. If appellant’s 

brief is not filed by the date specified, the Court will, without further notice, submit the appeal 

without briefs. See Tex. R. App. P. 38.8(b)(4); Lott v. State, 874 S.W.2d 687 (Tex. Crim. App. 

1994).

We DIRECT the Clerk to send a copy of this order, by first-class mail, to Akeashya 

Thomas, P.O. Box 824, Rowlett, Texas 75030.

We DIRECT the Clerk to send a copy of the order, by electronic transmission, to the 

Dallas County District Attorney’s Office.

/s/ LANA MYERS 

JUSTICE
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY ELEV

 1,040.76

 1,040.73

 1,040.72

 1,040.72

 1,040.77

 1,040.77

 1,040.75

 1,040.80

 1,040.86

 1,041.03

 1,041.08

 1,041.08

 1,041.10

 1,041.17

 1,041.11

 1,041.09

 1,041.17

 1,041.22

 1,041.11

 1,040.87

 1,040.77

 1,040.68

 1,040.64

 1,040.64

 1,040.78

 1,040.78

 1,040.74

 1,040.76

 1,040.65

 1,040.63

 1,040.68

 1,875.1

 1,874.8

 1,874.7

 1,874.7

 1,875.2

 1,875.2

 1,875.0

 1,875.5

 1,876.2

 1,878.0

 1,878.5

 1,878.5

 1,878.7

 1,879.5

 1,878.8

 1,878.6

 1,879.5

 1,880.0

 1,878.8

 1,876.3

 1,875.2

 1,874.2

 1,873.8

 1,873.8

 1,875.3

 1,875.3

 1,874.9

 1,875.1

 1,873.9

 1,873.7

 1,874.2

STORAGE

-0.5

-0.3

-0.1

+0.0

+0.5

+0.0

-0.2

+0.5

+0.6

+1.8

+0.5

+0.0

+0.2

+0.7

-0.6

-0.2

+0.9

+0.5

-1.2

-2.6

-1.1

-1.0

-0.4

+0.0

+1.5

+0.0

-0.4

+0.2

-1.2

-0.2

+0.5

CHANGE

285

389

487

360

413

189

415

622

336

1,012

687

525

308

391

374

401

438

269

393

296

373

471

680

837

839

599

342

502

471

618

285

INFLOW

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 970

 1,568

 895

 939

 863

 809

 57

 582

 547

 385

 1,051

 708

 0

POWER

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

SPILL

 543

 529

 523

 339

 128

 172

 505

 340

 0

 97

 370

 522

 180

 0

 687

 502

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

OUTLET

 10

 21

 17

 21

 17

 17

 17

 14

 14

 3

 48

 3

 21

 14

 10

 7

 7

 0

 14

 17

 14

 14

 31

 28

 31

 17

 10

 10

 10

 17

 17

C.F.S.

 .03

 .06

 .05

 .06

 .05

 .05

 .05

 .04

 .04

 .01

 .14

 .01

 .06

 .04

 .03

 .02

 .02

 .00

 .04

 .05

 .04

 .04

 .09

 .08

 .09

 .05

 .03

 .03

 .03

 .05

 .05

INCHES

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .45

 .36

 .01

 1.43

 .05

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 1.50

 .24

 .82

 .00

 .00

 .03

 .08

 .00

PRECIP

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

JANUARY 2001 NEW MELONES LAKE DAILY OPERATIONS RUN DATE: January 28, 2002

IN LAKE

EVAPORATION

INCHES

C.F.S.

COMPUTED*

1000 ACRE-FEET

RELEASE - C.F.S.

TOTALS -1.6 14,607 9,374 0 5,437 491 1.43 4.97

ACRE-FEET -1,600 28,973 18,593 0 10,784 974

COMMENTS:

* COMPUTED INFLOW IS THE SUM OF CHANGE IN STORAGE, RELEASES AND EVAPORATION.

SUMMARY

RELEASE (ACRE-FEET)

POWER 18,593

SPILL 0

OUTLET

TOTAL

 10,784

 29,377

PRECIPITATION

THIS MONTH =

TO DATE =

 4.97

JULY 1, 2000 12.33

 1,875.6