alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 218.43 When a surviving divorced spouse annuity ends. ( a ) *Entitlement based on age.* When the surviving divorced spouse annuity is based on age, the annuity ends with the earliest of the last day of the month before the month in which the surviving divorced spouse— ( 1 ) Dies;
( 2 ) Becomes entitled to an old age benefit under the Social Security Act that is equal to or larger than the amount of the full surviving divorced spouse annuity before reduction for age; or
( 3 ) Becomes entitled to a spouse or survivor annuity in a larger amount, unless he or she elects to be paid the smaller annuity.
( b ) *Entitlement based on disability.* When the surviving divorced spouse annuity is based on disability, the annuity ends with the earliest of— ( 1 ) The last day of the month shown in paragraph (a) of this section;
( 2 ) The last day of the second month following the month in which the disability ends; or
( 3 ) The last day of the month before the month in which the surviving divorced spouse attains full retirement age (the disability annuitant then becomes entitled based upon age).
( c ) *Entitlement based on “child in care.”* When the surviving divorced spouse annuity is based on having a “child in care” as explained in part 216 of this chapter, the annuity ends as shown in this paragraph unless he or she is at least age 60 and was married to the employee for at least 10 years. In that case, the surviving divorced spouse annuity based on having a child in care is changed to an annuity based on age. If the surviving divorced spouse is not entitled to an annuity based on age, the surviving divorced spouse annuity based on “child in care” ends with the earliest of— ( 1 ) The last day of the month shown in paragraph (a) of this section;
( 2 ) The last day of the month before the month in which the child is no longer in the surviving divorced spouse's care, as explained in part 216 of this chapter (in this case entitlement to the annuity does not terminate, but no annuity is payable while the child is no longer in care);
( 3 ) The last day of the month before the month in which the child attains age 16, unless the child is disabled;
( 4 ) The last day of the month before the month in which the surviving divorced spouse remarries unless the marriage is to an individual entitled to a retirement, disability, widow(er)'s, father's/mother's, parent's or child's disability benefit under the Railroad Retirement Act or Social Security Act;
( 5 ) The last day of the second month after the month in which the child's disability ends, if the child is over age 16; or
( 6 ) The last day of the month before the month in which the surviving divorced spouse attains full retirement age (the annuitant then becomes entitled to an annuity based upon age).
[54 FR 30725, July 24, 1989, as amended at 68 FR 39010, July 1, 2003]
Electrical Conductivity, UMHOS

Day High Low Mean

1 15,584 4,501 10,084

2 16,186 4,546 10,489

3 16,525 4,613 10,544

4 16,981 4,600 10,434

5 16,937 4,637 10,860

6 18,470 4,694 11,735

7 19,774 5,512 12,260

8 16,995 6,495 13,171

9 18,499 9,045 13,967

10 18,128 8,618 13,988

11 18,680 8,896 13,551

12 17,014 7,500 12,383

13 16,012 7,559 12,368

14 16,693 7,128 12,381

15 16,775 4,994 10,855

16 17,982 6,937 12,569

17 18,004 6,314 12,447

18 18,501 5,966 12,470

19 20,609 5,644 12,656

20 20,873 6,515 14,717

21 19,478 7,067 13,966

22 18,884 5,907 12,787

23 15,448 5,307 11,755

24 17,208 5,021 11,018

25 15,942 5,550 10,829

26 13,772 4,528 9,403

27 13,600 3,920 8,899

28 14,051 3,199 8,816

29 14,911 3,780 8,325

30 14,917 3,051 8,805

31 15,795 3,312 9,227

COMMENT(S):

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

Historical Archive and Report Database

Port Chicago Bottom In Suisun Bay

Period: October 2023 Run Date: 11/8/2023
(No. 6881

#### Howard Johnson’s Motor Lodge Southeast, Claimant, *vs.*State of Illinois, Department of Business and Economic Development, Respondent.

*Opinion filed October 10, 1972.*

Howard Johnson’s Motor Lodge Southeast, Claimant, pro se.

William J. Scott, Attorney General; William E. Webber, Assistant Attorney General, for Respondent.

Perlin, C.J.
1fDS7 UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY



# ~ ~S~7

~ 75 Hawthorne Street 1r~~ -~:‘ji:~- ~ San Francisco, CA 94105 ~t PRO~’ October 17, 2014 Marcia Hadenfeldt, LibraryAssistant Montezuma Creek Library and BluffLibrary, San Juan County P.O. Box 99 BluffUT 84512 Subject: Public documents atthe Montezuma Creek Library and Bluff Library for public

inspection Dear Ms. Hadenfeldt: The U. S. Environmental Protection Agency sentyou a package containing a number ofdocuments regarding the McElmo Creek Unit Oil Production Facility on the Navajo Nation Indian Reservation nearthe city ofAneth, San Juan County, Utah. Two ofthese documents contained an error, and need to be replaced. Please replace the following documents in the package previously sentto you with the enclosed documents: 1. PUBLIC INFORMATION SHEET 2. AMBIENTAIR QUALITY IMPACT REPORT & FACT SHEET Yourassistance with this matter is greatly appreciated. Feel free to contact me at (415) 947-4156 or ke11y.shaheerah(~epa.gov ifyou have any questions.Sincerely,
Shaheerah Kelly, Environmental Engineer Permits Office Air Division Enclosures
Editorial Note on Part 70
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 70 appear by T.D. ATF-450, 66 FR 29022-29030, May 29, 2001.

§ 70.442 Taxes relating to machine guns, destructive devices, and certain other firearms. Part 479 of title 27 CFR contains the regulations relative to the: ( a ) Payment of special (occupational) taxes by manufacturers and importers of and dealers in, machine guns, destructive devices, and certain other types of firearms,
( b ) Payment of the tax on the making or transfer of such firearms,
( c ) Registration, identification, importation, and exportation of such firearms,
( d ) Keeping of books and records and rendering of returns, and
( e ) The forfeiture and disposition of seized firearms under the provisions of the National Firearms Act.
[T.D. ATF-251, 52 FR 19325, May 22, 1987. Redesignated by T.D. ATF-301, 55 FR 47653, Nov. 14, 1990, as amended by T.D. TTB-91, 76 FR 5481, Feb. 1, 2011]
### §360n–1. Priority review for qualified infectious disease products

#### (a) In general

If the Secretary designates a drug under section 355f(d) of this title as a qualified infectious disease product, then the Secretary shall give priority review to the first application submitted for approval for such drug under section 355(b) of this title, or section 262(a) of title 42, that requires clinical data (other than bioavailability studies) to demonstrate safety or effectiveness.

#### (b) Construction

Nothing in this section shall prohibit the Secretary from giving priority review to a human drug application or efficacy supplement submitted for approval under section 355(b) of this title that otherwise meets the criteria for the Secretary to grant priority review.

(June 25, 1938, ch. 675, §524A, as added Pub. L. 112–144, title VIII, §802(a), July 9, 2012, 126 Stat. 1079; amended Pub. L. 114–255, div. A, title III, §3101(a)(2)(N), Dec. 13, 2016, 130 Stat. 1154; Pub. L. 117–328, div. FF, title III, §3212(b), Dec. 29, 2022, 136 Stat. 5826.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

2022—Subsec. (a). Pub. L. 117–328 inserted ", or section 262(a) of title 42, that requires clinical data (other than bioavailability studies) to demonstrate safety or effectiveness" before period at end.

2016—Pub. L. 114–255 designated existing provisions as subsec. (a), inserted heading, substituted "the first application" for "any application", and added subsec. (b).

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date

Pub. L. 112–144, title VIII, §802(b), July 9, 2012, 126 Stat. 1079, provided that: "Section 524A of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act [21 U.S.C. 360n–1], as added by subsection (a), applies only with respect to an application that is submitted under section 505(b) of such Act (21 U.S.C. 355(b)) on or after the date of the enactment of this Act [July 9, 2012]."
---

Exhibit 99.14


March 30, 2011 CONSENT OF NEIL BURNS United States Securities and Exchange Commission Gentlemen: In connection with Silver Wheaton Corp.s (the Company) Annual Report on Form 40-F for the year ended December 31, 2010 (the Annual Report), I, Neil Burns, P.Geo, Director Geology, Silver Wheaton Corp., hereby consent to the inclusion in, or incorporation by reference into, the Annual Report and the Companys Registration statement on Form S-8 (File No. 333-128128), of the following: 1.
     Resource estimates of the Yauliyacu Mine; and2.
     Technical report dated March 29, 2011, entitled 2010 Resources and Reserve Update, Yauliyacu Mine, Peru.
  Yours truly,/s/ Neil BurnsNeil Burns, P.GeoDirector Geology,Silver Wheaton Corp.


---
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

DAY ELEV

 122.67

 122.94

 122.96

 122.70

 122.38

 122.88

 122.78

 123.27

 122.86

 122.95

 122.61

 122.64

 122.43

 122.47

 122.39

 122.62

 122.77

 122.28

 122.49

 122.40

 122.90

 122.76

 123.15

 123.82

 124.05

 124.15

 124.03

 123.87

 123.40

 122.75

 7,643

 7,764

 7,773

 7,656

 7,512

 7,737

 7,692

 7,918

 7,728

 7,769

 7,616

 7,629

 7,535

 7,553

 7,517

 7,620

 7,688

 7,467

 7,562

 7,521

 7,746

 7,683

 7,862

 8,176

 8,286

 8,336

 8,276

 8,200

 7,979

 7,679

STORAGE

+176

+121

+9

-117

-144

+225

-45

+226

-190

+41

-153

+13

-94

+18

-36

+103

+68

-221

+95

-41

+225

-63

+179

+314

+110

+50

-60

-76

-221

-300

CHANGE

1,973

1,944

1,888

1,824

1,812

1,986

1,545

1,968

1,752

1,870

1,770

1,851

1,796

1,854

1,795

1,870

1,850

1,686

1,844

1,841

1,913

1,771

1,895

1,963

1,936

1,892

1,788

1,763

1,723

1,657

INFLOW

 1,806

 1,805

 1,805

 1,805

 1,807

 1,794

 1,490

 1,781

 1,780

 1,780

 1,780

 1,781

 1,780

 1,777

 1,732

 1,732

 1,731

 1,730

 1,731

 1,187

 1,730

 1,730

 1,732

 1,729

 991

 978

 894

 952

 1,756

 1,736

POWER

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 2

 612

 0

 0

 0

 0

 812

 811

 846

 771

 0

 0

SPILL

 45

 45

 45

 45

 45

 45

 45

 45

 45

 45

 45

 45

 45

 45

 45

 45

 45

 45

 45

 45

 45

 45

 45

 45

 45

 45

 45

 45

 45

 45

HATCHERY

 3

 3

 3

 3

 3

 4

 3

 3

 3

 4

 4

 3

 3

 3

 3

 3

 3

 2

 3

 3

 3

 3

 3

 3

 3

 3

 3

 3

 3

 2

C.F.S.

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

SEPTEMBER 2018 LAKE NATOMA DAILY OPERATIONS RUN DATE: October 1, 2018

IN LAKE

EVAP

C.F.S.

COMPUTED*

ACRE-FEET

RELEASE - C.F.S.

TOTALS +212 55,020 48,842 3,854 1,350 91

ACRE-FEET +212 109,132 96,878 7,644 2,678 180

COMMENTS:

* COMPUTED INFLOW IS THE SUM OF CHANGE IN STORAGE, RELEASES AND EVAPORATION.

SUMMARY

RELEASES (ACRE-FEET)

POWER 96,878

SPILL 7,644

FOLSOM SOUTH CANAL

HATCHERY

 1,539

 2,678

 7,467

FOLSOM

SOUTH 

 30

 30

 30

 30

 30

 30

 30

 25

 20

 20

 18

 15

 15

 20

 33

 38

 37

 20

 15

 15

 22

 25

 25

 28

 30

 30

 30

 30

 30

 25

 776

 1,539

(1)

(1) INCHES OF EVAPORATION TAKEN FROM FOLSOM PAN.

RELEASES (ACRE-FEET) 

TOTAL 108,739
#### § 30.708 Does the fee schedule apply to every kind of procedure?

Where the time, effort and skill required to perform a particular procedure vary widely from one occasion to the next, OWCP may choose not to assign a relative value to that procedure. In this case the allowable charge for the procedure will be set individually based on consideration of a detailed medical report and other evidence. At its discretion, OWCP may set fees without regard to schedule limits for specially authorized consultant examinations, for directed medical examinations, and for other specially authorized services.
Exhibit 10.2
 TERMINATION AGREEMENT
 Agreement Company Parent Consultant
 Consulting Agreement
  Termination.
 Release of Claims.
 Amendment.
 Successors and Assigns.
 Governing Law.
 Execution of Counterparts.
 [signature page follows]




---



##### 



ENERGY TRANSFER EQUITY, L.P.By:
    /s/ John W. McReynoldsName:
    John W. McReynoldsTitle:
    President and Chief Financial OfficerSOUTHERN UNION COMPANYBy:
    /s/ George LindemannName:
    George LindemannTitle:
    Chairman and CEOEric D. Herschmann/s/ Eric D. Herschmann [Signature page to the Termination Agreement (Consulting)]
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

DAY HIGH

 2,727

 3,435

 3,149

 1,729

 1,774

 2,130

 1,945

 1,975

 2,017

 1,777

 1,953

 2,355

 2,035

 2,948

 4,797

 2,271

 3,379

 1,858

 1,386

 1,306

 1,755

 1,728

 2,781

 2,899

 3,122

 3,968

 4,993

 4,026

 4,809

 4,780

 457

 521

 593

 440

 371

 416

 438

 476

 479

 468

 465

 476

 416

 478

 537

 478

 516

 362

 326

 357

 336

 338

 367

 423

 503

 603

 665

 597

 616

 634

 1,026

 1,209

 1,175

 984

 862

 957

 922

 940

 896

 809

 824

 864

 836

 1,130

 1,648

 1,035

 1,168

 861

 692

 695

 720

 730

 899

 1,249

 1,181

 1,559

 1,725

 1,543

 1,621

 1,621

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

APRIL 2002 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: May 8, 2002

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

PITTSBURG TOP ON THE SACRAMENTO RIVER
<PAGE>
                THE TRAVELERS INSURANCE COMPANY AND SUBSIDIARIES

                                                                   Exhibit 99.01

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of The Travelers Insurance Company (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ending June 30, 2002 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, George
C. Kokulis, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that:

     (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.


/s/ George C. Kokulis
-------------------------
George C. Kokulis
Chief Executive Officer

August 14, 2002


                                       21
Exhibit
5.2
  
 Registration Statement on Form S-3ASR
  Registration
Statement Commission Holdings AAM,
Inc. Subsidiary Guarantors Registrants Securities Act Common Stock Holdings Preferred Stock AAM, Inc. Preferred
Stock Preferred Stock Debt Securities Debt Warrants Common Stock
Warrants Warrant Shares Prospectus Prospectus Supplement




---



##### 



Securities
 Indenture Trustee
  (i)
    
    the Indenture will have been duly authorized, executed and delivered by the
Trustee; and(ii)
    
    prior to the offering and sale of Debt Securities, the respective officers of
the Registrants duly authorized by each Registrants Board of Directors or a committee
thereof will (a) authorize by proper corporate action the terms of and the prices at
which the Debt Securities (including the Guarantees endorsed thereon) are to be issued
and sold pursuant to the terms of the Indenture and (b) execute and deliver the
Indenture.
   Signature page follows
 2




---



##### 



/s/ Richard G. Raymond
Richard G. Raymond
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY HIGH

 2,988

 4,987

 5,398

 6,033

 8,011

 8,356

 9,034

 9,206

 8,934

 7,643

 6,058

 4,460

 3,939

 4,177

 3,803

 4,050

 4,744

 5,411

 7,137

 7,201

 7,013

 6,129

 7,045

 7,076

 5,911

 4,103

 4,269

 4,842

 5,075

 5,596

 5,734

 357

 588

 688

 1,152

 1,348

 1,315

 1,315

 1,230

 1,168

 1,023

 991

 890

 919

 789

 814

 889

 804

 821

 1,008

 1,230

 1,061

 882

 839

 1,021

 911

 630

 661

 711

 776

 823

 1,081

 1,166

 2,015

 2,272

 2,978

 3,432

 3,407

 3,659

 3,698

 3,684

 3,335

 2,904

 2,425

 2,306

 1,929

 1,756

 1,708

 1,691

 2,052

 2,844

 3,313

 2,841

 2,476

 2,752

 2,860

 2,493

 2,064

 2,059

 2,349

 2,564

 2,522

 2,512

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

MAY 2016 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: June 10, 2016

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

PITTSBURG BOTTOM ON THE SACRAMENTO RIVER
(No. 6946

#### John R. Bateman, M.D., Claimant, *vs.*State of Illinois, Department of Mental Health, Respondent.

*Opinion filed December 15, 1972.*

Dr. John R. Bateman, Claimant, pro se.

William J. Scott, Attorney General; Saul R. Wexler, Assistant Attorney General, for Respondent.

Per Curiam.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY HIGH

 13,867

 13,802

 13,626

 12,958

 10,733

 9,222

 7,477

 7,251

 7,301

 7,253

 7,406

 8,959

 9,302

 8,824

 8,466

 7,929

 8,137

 7,440

 6,439

 5,788

 5,294

 5,044

 4,733

 4,901

 5,126

 7,027

 8,364

 8,850

 9,209

 8,253

 6,976

 2,972

 2,517

 2,591

 2,609

 2,491

 2,090

 2,444

 2,361

 2,273

 2,145

 1,700

 1,705

 1,793

 1,562

 1,422

 1,371

 1,405

 1,405

 1,247

 1,233

 1,077

 1,214

 1,408

 1,486

 1,473

 1,512

 1,676

 1,867

 1,556

 1,576

 1,442

 6,760

 6,734

 6,763

 6,468

 5,900

 5,261

 4,961

 4,652

 4,198

 3,770

 3,724

 4,403

 4,307

 4,161

 3,892

 3,877

 3,831

 3,589

 3,282

 3,009

 2,831

 2,897

 2,939

 2,809

 2,568

 3,119

 3,988

 4,440

 4,308

 4,003

 3,319

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

JULY 2004 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: August 12, 2004

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

PITTSBURG BOTTOM ON THE SACRAMENTO RIVER
```

[Congressional Bills 114th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 3864 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

114th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 3864

 To prevent certain monitoring and interception by Federal authorities 
of Federal prisoner communications that are subject to attorney-client 
                               privilege.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            October 29, 2015

 Mr. Jeffries (for himself and Mr. Collins of Georgia) introduced the 
  following bill; which was referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To prevent certain monitoring and interception by Federal authorities 
of Federal prisoner communications that are subject to attorney-client 
                               privilege.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Effective Assistance of Counsel in 
the Digital Era Act''.

SEC. 2. PRISONER COMMUNICATIONS THAT ARE SUBJECT TO ATTORNEY-CLIENT 
              PRIVILEGE.

    (a) In General.--Except as provided in subsection (b) it shall be 
unlawful for any person acting under the authority of the United States 
to monitor any electronic communication (as defined in section 2510 of 
title 18, United States Code) to which a prisoner in a Bureau of 
Prisons correctional facility is a party, if that communication is 
subject to attorney-client privilege.
    (b) Exception.--Subsection (a) does not apply to a communication 
the Attorney General has reason to believe poses a threat to national 
security.
    (c) Rules by Attorney General.--The Attorney General shall 
prescribe rules to carry out this section.
                                 <all>
```
STATE OF IDAHO 

DEPARTMENT OF 

ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY 

1410 North Hilton • Boise, Idaho 83706 • (208) 373-0502 

October 18, 2013 

Dennis McLerran 

Regional Administrator 

U.S. EPA Region 10 

1200 Sixth Avenue 

Seattle WA 98101 

Dear Mr. McLerran, 

RECEIVED ON: 

uL I t. il 2013 

EPA Region 10 

Office of the Regional Administrator 

C.L. "Butch" Otter, Governor 

Curt Fransen, Director 

This letter is written to provide EPA assurance that the Idaho Department of Environmental 

Quality (DEQ) does not intend to apply federal regulations that have been vacated by the D.C. 

Circuit Court of Appeals. Specifically, as a result of the decision in Sierra Club v. EPA, 705 

F.3d 458, Idaho confirms that it will not apply either the PM2.5 significant impact levels (SILs) 

provision at 40 CFR 52.21 (k)(2) or the PM2.5 significant monitoring concentration (SMC) 

provisions at 40 CFR 52.21(i)(5)(i)(c). The PM2.5 SILs and SMC provisions were adopted by 

reference at IDAPA 58.01.01.107.03.c. DEQ intends to remove the provisions to ensure 

consistency with federal law as soon as practicable. 

If you have any questions or require additional information, please contact Tiffany Floyd at 

(208)373-0552. 

Thank you for your attention in this matter. 

Sincerely, 

Curt Fransen 

Director 

CAF:tc 

c: Tiffany Floyd, Idaho DEQ Air Quality Administrator 

Lisa J Carlson, Deputy Attorney General 

Mike Simon, Idaho DEQ Stationary Source Program Manager 

Pr1n/ed 011 Racycloa Paper