alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

August 30, 2017

Annual Power System Generation Summary

12/31/2001 RUN DATE:

 2,759

 1,651,413

SHASTA 

 1,648,654

 395,737

 1,595

 394,142

 403,532

 404,926

 1,429

 384,010

 1,126

 453,336

 1,213

 305,431

 2,229

 303,202

 41,788

 151

 41,637

 12,303

 265

 12,038

 6,261

 5,957

 151,878

 4,028,861

 4,180,739

 4,016,929

 4,168,807

KESWICK 

TRINITY 

JF CARR

SPRING CREEK

FOLSOM 

NIMBUS 

Total Net

Total Gross

Federal Share of San Luis

O'NEILL

STAMPEDE (Washoe Project)

GROSS GEN

STA. SERV. 

NET GEN. 

GROSS GEN 

STA. SERV. 

NET GEN. 

TR GEN.

GROSS GEN. 

STA. SERV. 

GROSS GEN.

STA. SERV. 

GROSS GEN. 

STA. SERV. 

GROSS GEN. 

STA. SERV. 

NET GEN. 

GROSS GEN. 

STA. SERV. 

NET GEN. 

Generation 

With Federal Share of San Luis 

Generation 

With Federal Share of San Luis 

Out Meter

GROSS GEN 

NET GEN. 

GROSS GEN. 

STA. SERV. 

NET GEN.

MWH 

MWH

MWH 

MWH 

MWH 

MWH 

MWH 

MWH 

MWH

MWH 

MWH 

MWH 

MWH 

MWH 

MWH 

MWH 

MWH 

MWH 

MWH 

MWH 

MWH

MWH

MWH

MWH

MWH

MWH

MWH

MWH

MWH

LN GEN. 1,394

MWH 

NET GEN. 403,497 MWH

 382,884 NET GEN. MWH 

 452,123 NET GEN. MWH 

 385,959

 1,126

 384,833

NEW MELONES

GROSS GEN. 

STA. SERV. 

NET GEN. 

MWH 

MWH 

MWH 

Calendar Year 01/01/2001 -

*

* Not all data available prior to January 2003

2001:

:
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

August 30, 2017

Annual Power System Generation Summary

09/30/2001 RUN DATE:

 3,189

 1,769,233

SHASTA 

 1,766,044

 400,934

 1,650

 399,284

 384,644

 386,461

 1,480

 363,493

 1,195

 389,145

 1,070

 363,985

 2,361

 361,624

 47,536

 153

 47,383

 12,147

 263

 11,884

 6,261

 5,954

 151,878

 4,102,578

 4,254,456

 4,090,060

 4,241,938

KESWICK 

TRINITY 

JF CARR

SPRING CREEK

FOLSOM 

NIMBUS 

Total Net

Total Gross

Federal Share of San Luis

O'NEILL

STAMPEDE (Washoe Project)

GROSS GEN

STA. SERV. 

NET GEN. 

GROSS GEN 

STA. SERV. 

NET GEN. 

TR GEN.

GROSS GEN. 

STA. SERV. 

GROSS GEN.

STA. SERV. 

GROSS GEN. 

STA. SERV. 

GROSS GEN. 

STA. SERV. 

NET GEN. 

GROSS GEN. 

STA. SERV. 

NET GEN. 

Generation 

With Federal Share of San Luis 

Generation 

With Federal Share of San Luis 

Out Meter

GROSS GEN 

NET GEN. 

GROSS GEN. 

STA. SERV. 

NET GEN.

MWH 

MWH 

MWH 

MWH 

MWH 

MWH 

MWH 

MWH 

MWH

MWH 

MWH 

MWH 

MWH 

MWH 

MWH 

MWH 

MWH 

MWH 

MWH 

MWH 

MWH

MWH

MWH

MWH

MWH

MWH

MWH

MWH

LN GEN. 1,817

MWH 

NET GEN. 384,981 MWH

NET GEN. 362,298 MWH 

 388,075 NET GEN. MWH 

 375,530

 1,113

 374,417

NEW MELONES

GROSS GEN. 

STA. SERV. 

NET GEN. 

MWH 

MWH 

MWH 

Fiscal Year 10/01/2000 -

* Not all data available prior to January 2003

*

MWH

2001:
Exhibit 99.21

                       GE CAPITAL MORTGAGE SERVICES, INC.
            OFFICERS' ANNUAL COMPLIANCE CERTIFICATE - SERIES 1999-HE1

         The undersigned,  Vice Presidents of GE Capital Mortgage Services, Inc.
(the "Servicer"), pursuant to the Pooling and Servicing Agreement for the Series
1999-HE1 Home Equity Loan Pass-Through  Certificates  (the "Agreement")  entered
into by GE Capital  Mortgage  Services,  Inc., as Seller and  Servicer,  and The
First National Bank of Chicago,  as Trustee,  which Agreement requires an annual
statement of compliance to be made to the Trustee by an officer of the Servicer,
hereby state that:

         (i)      a  review  of  the  activities  of  the  Servicer  during  the
                  preceding  calendar  year  and of its  performance  under  the
                  Agreement  has  been  made  under  the  undersigned  officers'
                  supervision; and

         (ii)     to the best of the undersigned  officers' knowledge,  based on
                  such  review,  (1)  the  Servicer  has  fulfilled  all  of its
                  material obligations under the Agreement throughout such year,
                  except as set forth on Exhibit A hereto.
                  and (2) no Trigger Event has occurred.

Capitalized  terms used  herein but not  defined  herein  shall have the meaning
given to them in the Agreement.

Dated:            March 24, 2000

By:      /s/ Gregory A. Gibson
------------------------------
         Gregory A. Gibson
         Senior Vice President

By:      /s/ Tim Neer
------------------------------
         Tim Neer
         Vice President

<PAGE>

                                    EXHIBIT A





                                      None
Exhibit 99.1 ROBERTS REALTY INVESTORS, INC. CONTACT:
    
    FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASECharles S. Roberts
    
    June 30, 2011President
 Telephone: (770) 394-6000

Fax:            (770) 551-5914 Roberts Realty Investors Announces Strategic Moves
to Enhance Shareholder Value ATLANTA, June 30, 2011 (BUSINESS WIRE)  Roberts Realty Investors, Inc. (NYSE: RPI), a real estate investment trust
focused on the development, management and ownership of multifamily residential communities, announced today it has
retained Sandler ONeill + Partners, L.P. to explore potential strategic alternatives for the REIT. Charles Roberts, Chairman, President & CEO of Roberts Realty said, We look forward to commencing a formal process to
ensure we maximize shareholder value. Roberts continued, We believe there are many ways we can improve our value
with the help of the professionals at Sandler ONeill. These alternatives could include a sale, merger or other
business combination.  We are exploring these alternatives and will work to accomplish a mutually beneficial outcome
for our shareholders and employees. Sandler is excited about the opportunity to assist Roberts Realty in this process, said Thomas Howland, Managing
Director of Sandler ONeill. As an example, given the uncertainty in the IPO market, we believe a larger, private
real estate operator would welcome the opportunity to merge into Roberts Realty to become a publicly traded company and
provide enhanced liquidity to the current Roberts Realty shareholders  a win-win for both parties, Howland said. There can be no assurance that the exploration of strategic alternatives will result in any transaction, or that, if
completed, any transaction will be on attractive terms. Roberts Realty does not intend to disclose developments with
respect to its strategic review process unless and until its Board of Directors has approved a specific transaction. About Roberts Realty Investors

Roberts Realty Investors, Inc. owns and manages its real estate assets as a self-administered, self-managed equity real
estate investment trust (REIT) focused on multifamily residential communities.  1




---



##### 



About Sandler ONeill + Partners, L.P.

Founded in 1988, Sandler ONeill + Partners, L.P. is a full-service investment banking firm dedicated to providing
comprehensive, innovative advisory and transaction execution services to the financial industry. The firm specializes
in strategic business planning, mergers and acquisitions, capital markets, mutual-to-stock conversions, investment
portfolio and interest rate risk management, fixed income securities transactions and mortgage finance restructurings.
Sandler ONeill also is a market maker in hundreds of financial stocks and publishes equity and fixed income research
focused on selected real estate investment trusts, banks, thrifts and insurance companies, credit card companies,
investment banks, asset managers, specialty finance companies, e-finance companies, and transaction execution
companies.  2
PUBLIC LAW 113–171—SEPT. 26, 2014 128 STAT. 1895 

LEGISLATIVE HISTORY—H.R. 4751: 

HOUSE REPORTS: No. 113–579 (Comm. on Natural Resources). 

CONGRESSIONAL RECORD, Vol. 160 (2014): 

Sept. 8, 10, considered and passed House. 

Sept. 17, considered and passed Senate. 

Æ 

Public Law 113–171 

113th Congress 

An Act 

To make technical corrections to Public Law 110–229 to reflect the renaming of 

the Bainbridge Island Japanese American Exclusion Memorial, and for other 

purposes. 

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of 

the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

SECTION 1. BAINBRIDGE ISLAND JAPANESE AMERICAN EXCLUSION 

MEMORIAL. 

Section 313 of the Consolidated Natural Resources Act of 2008 

(Public Law 110–229) is amended as follows: 

(1) In the heading of subsection (b), by striking ‘‘JAPANESE

AMERICAN MEMORIAL’’ and inserting ‘‘JAPANESE AMERICAN

EXCLUSION MEMORIAL’’. 

(2) In the heading of subsection (c)(5)(C), by striking ‘‘JAPA- NESE AMERICAN MEMORIAL’’ and inserting ‘‘JAPANESE AMERICAN

EXCLUSION MEMORIAL’’. 

(3) In subsection (c)(5)(C), by striking ‘‘Japanese American 

Memorial’’ and inserting ‘‘Japanese American Exclusion Memorial’’. 

Approved September 26, 2014. 

16 USC 431 and 

461 notes. 

Sept. 26, 2014 

[H.R. 4751] 


kgrant on DSKB33CYQ1 with PUBLAW
#### § 234.19 Effect of payment on future entitlement.

Payment of an LSDP does not affect the entitlement of survivors to monthly annuities at a later date.
Electrical Conductivity, UMHOS

Day High Low Mean

1 0 0 0

2 0 0 0

3 0 0 0

4 0 0 0

5 0 0 0

6 0 0 0

7 0 0 0

8 0 0 0

9 0 0 0

10 0 0 0

11 0 0 0

12 0 0 0

13 0 0 0

14 0 0 0

15 0 0 0

16 0 0 0

17 0 0 0

18 0 0 0

19 0 0 0

20 0 0 0

21 0 0 0

22 0 0 0

23 0 0 0

24 0 0 0

25 0 0 0

26 0 0 0

27 0 0 0

28 0 0 0

29 0 0 0

30 0 0 0

COMMENT(S):

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

Historical Archive and Report Database

Pittsburg TopOn The Sacramento River

Period: November 2022 Run Date: 12/8/2022
§ 30.908 How will the FAB evaluate new medical evidence submitted to challenge the impairment determination in the recommended decision? ( a ) If an employee submits an additional impairment evaluation that differs from the impairment evaluation relied upon by the district office, the FAB will not consider the additional impairment evaluation if it does not meet the criteria listed in § 30.905(b)(1), (2) and (3).
( b ) The employee shall bear the burden of proving that the additional impairment evaluation submitted is more probative than the evaluation relied upon by the district office to determine the employee's recommended impairment rating.
( c ) If an employee submits an additional impairment evaluation that differs from the impairment evaluation relied upon by the district office, the FAB will review all relevant evidence of impairment in the record, and will base its determinations regarding impairment upon the evidence it considers to be most probative. The FAB will determine the impairment rating after it has evaluated all relevant evidence and argument in the record.
[71 FR 78534, Dec. 29, 2006, as amended at 84 FR 3060, Feb. 8, 2019]
#### § 219.34 When evidence that a marriage has ended is required.

Evidence of how a previous marriage ended may be required to determine whether a later marriage is valid. If a widow or widower remarried after the employee's death and that marriage was annulled, evidence of the annulment is required. If the claimant is a divorced spouse or surviving divorced spouse, evidence to prove a final or absolute divorce from the employee may be required.
EXHIBIT
31.2





CERTIFICATION
OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF
2002








I, Brett
L. Scott, Chief Financial Officer of Alsius Corporation (the “Company”), certify
that:




1. I
have reviewed this Annual Report on Form 10-K of the Company;




2. Based
on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material
fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in
light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading
with respect to the period covered by this report;




3. Based
on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information
included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial
condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and
for, the periods presented in this report.




4. The
registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and
maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act
Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:




(a)
Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure
controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that
material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated
subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly
during the period in which this report is being prepared;




(b)
Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness
of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered
by this report based on such evaluation; and




(c)
Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over
financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal
quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report)
that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the
registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and




5. The
registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most
recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the
registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of
directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):




(a)
All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation
of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to
adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and
report financial information; and




(b)
Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees
who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial
reporting.




/s/
      Brett L. ScottBrett
      L. Scott,Chief
      Financial Officer


Date:
March 13, 2008
<PAGE>

                                   EXHIBIT 32

                               CCFNB BANCORP, INC.

                          CEO CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

      In connection with the Quarterly Report of CCFNB Bancorp, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the quarter-ended March 31, 2005, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Lance
O. Diehl, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, and

      I ,Virginia D. Kocher, the Principal Financial Officer of the company,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

      1.    The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
            15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      2.    The information contained in the Report fairly represents, in all
            material respects, the financial condition and result of operations
            of the Company.

Date: May 10, 2005


                                     /s/ Lance O. Diehl
                                     -------------------------------
                                         Lance O. Diehl
                                         Chief Executive Officer

Date: May 10, 2005


                                     /s/ Virginia D. Kocher
                                     -------------------------------
                                         Virginia D. Kocher
                                         Principal Financial Officer

                                      28
Electrical Conductivity, UMHOS

Day High Low Mean

1 0 0 0

2 0 0 0

3 0 0 0

4 0 0 0

5 0 0 0

6 0 0 0

7 0 0 0

8 0 0 0

9 0 0 0

10 0 0 0

11 0 0 0

12 0 0 0

13 0 0 0

14 0 0 0

15 0 0 0

16 0 0 0

17 0 0 0

18 0 0 0

19 0 0 0

20 0 0 0

21 0 0 0

22 0 0 0

23 0 0 0

24 0 0 0

25 0 0 0

26 0 0 0

27 0 0 0

28 0 0 0

29 0 0 0

30 0 0 0

31 0 0 0

COMMENT(S):

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

Historical Archive and Report Database

Port Chicago Bottom In Suisun Bay

Period: January 2024 Run Date: 2/7/2024
§ 404.1073 Public office. ( a ) *General.* The performance of the functions of a public office is not a trade or business except under the circumstances explained in paragraph (b) of this section. If you are an officer of a State or political subdivision, you are considered as employee of the State or political subdivision.
( b ) *State and local governmental employees paid by fees* — ( 1 ) *Voluntary coverage under section 218 of the Act.* The services of employees of States and political subdivisions, including those in positions paid solely on a fee-basis, may be covered as employment by a Federal-State agreement under section 218 of the Act (see subpart M of this part). States, when entering into these agreements, have the option of excluding under the agreement coverage of services in positions paid solely by fees. If you occupy a position paid solely on a fee-basis and the State has not covered your services under section 218 of the Act, you are considered to be engaged in a trade or business.
( 2 ) *Mandatory old-age, survivors, disability, and hospital insurance coverage.* Beginning with services performed after July 1, 1991, Social Security coverage (old-age, survivors, disability, and hospital insurance) is mandatory, with certain exceptions, for services performed by employees of a State, a political subdivision of a State, or of a wholly owned instrumentality of one or more of the foregoing, if the employees are not members of a retirement system of the State, political subdivision, or instrumentality. Among the exclusions from such mandatory coverage is service performed by an employee in a position compensated solely on a fee-basis which is treated pursuant to section 211(c)(2)(E) of the Act as a trade or business for purposes of inclusion of such fees in the net earnings from self-employment.
( 3 ) If you are a notary public, you are not a public officer even though you perform a public function. Your services as a notary public are not covered for social security purposes.
[45 FR 20075, Mar. 27, 1980, as amended at 57 FR 59910, Dec. 17, 1992]
**EXHIBIT 99.29** 

 

**CONSENT OF ROBERT BRYSON**

 

United States Securities and Exchange Commission

Gentlemen:

In connection with Silver Wheaton Corporation’s (the “Company”) Annual Report on Form 40-F for the year ended December 31, 2008 (the “Annual Report”), I, Robert H. Bryson, MMSA, Vice President, Engineering (Goldcorp Inc.), hereby consent to the inclusion in, or incorporation by reference into, and the use of my name in connection with the preparation of the following            documents/reports:

 

| 1.     | Resource and reserve estimates of the Peñasquito Mine;                                                                                                                                              |
|--------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   |                                                                                                                                                                                                       |
| 2.     | Technical report dated March 10, 2009, entitled “Peñasquito Project Technical Report, Concepcion del Oro District, Zacatecus State, Mexico” re-addressed to Silver Wheaton Corporation; |
|   |                                                                                                                                                                                                       |
| 3.     | The Annual Report.                                                                                                                                                                                         |

 

Date: March 30, 2009

|   | Yours truly,/s/ Robert H. Bryson                                                                                                                                         |
|--------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   | Name: Robert H. Bryson, MMSA Title:  Vice President, Engineering            Goldcorp Incorporation |
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Giovanni Manghavita, etc., Appellant.

Judgment of conviction of the County Court of Kings county affirmed. No opinion. Jenks, P. J., Burr, Thomas and Rich, JJ., concurred; Stapleton, J., dissented.
###### Editorial Note on Part 555

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 555 appear by T.D. ATF-487, 68 FR 3748, Jan. 24, 2003.

#### § 555.34 Replacement of stolen or lost ATF Form 5400.30 (Intrastate Purchase of Explosives Coupon (IPEC)).

When any Form 5400.30 is stolen, lost, or destroyed, the person losing possession will, upon discovery of the theft, loss, or destruction, immediately, but in all cases before 24 hours have elapsed since discovery, report the matter to the Director by telephoning 1-888-ATF-BOMB (nationwide toll free number). The report will explain in detail the circumstances of the theft, loss, or destruction and will include all known facts that may serve to identify the document. Upon receipt of the report, the Director will make such investigation as appears appropriate and may issue a duplicate document upon such conditions as the circumstances warrant.

(Approved by the Office of Management and Budget under control number 1140-0077)

[ATF No. 1, 68 FR 13783, Mar. 20, 2003]
### §321c. Nonfat dry milk; "milk" defined

For the purposes of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act of June 26, 1938, (ch. 675, sec. 1, 52 Stat. 1040) [21 U.S.C. 301 et seq.] nonfat dry milk is the product resulting from the removal of fat and water from milk, and contains the lactose, milk proteins, and milk minerals in the same relative proportions as in the fresh milk from which made. It contains not over 5 per centum by weight of moisture. The fat content is not over 11⁄2 per centum by weight unless otherwise indicated.

The term "milk", when used herein, means sweet milk of cows.

(Mar. 2, 1944, ch. 77, 58 Stat. 108; July 2, 1956, ch. 495, 70 Stat. 486.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

The Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act of June 26, 1938 (ch. 675, sec. 1, 52 Stat. 1040), referred to in text, probably means act June 25, 1938, ch. 675, 52 Stat. 1040, which is classified generally to this chapter (§301 et seq.). For complete classification of this Act to the Code, see section 301 of this title and Tables.

#### Codification

Section was not enacted as a part of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act which comprises this chapter, but was made applicable thereto.

#### Amendments

1956—Act July 2, 1956, substituted "nonfat dry milk" for "nonfat dry milk solids or defatted milk solids".