alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 9.159 Yorkville Highlands. ( a ) *Name.* The name of the viticultural area described in this section is “Yorkville Highlands.”
( b ) *Approved maps.* The appropriate maps for determining the boundary of the Yorkville Highlands viticultural area are the following six U.S.G.S. topographical maps (7.5 minute series, 1:24000 scale): ( 1 ) Gube Mountain, Calif., provisional edition 1991;
( 2 ) Big Foot Mountain, Calif., provisional edition 1991;
( 3 ) Cloverdale, Calif., 1960, photoinspected 1975;
( 4 ) Ornbaun Valley Quadrangle, Calif., provisional edition, 1991;
( 5 ) Yorkville, Calif., provisional edition, 1991;
( 6 ) Hopland, Calif., 1960, photoinspected 1975.
( c ) *Boundary.* The Yorkville Highlands viticultural area is located in Mendocino County, California. The boundary is as follows: ( 1 ) The beginning point is Benchmark 680, located in Section 30, T. 12 N., R. 13 W., on the Ornbaum Valley quadrangle map;
( 2 ) From the beginning point, the boundary proceeds in a straight line in a northeasterly direction to a point intersecting the North Fork of Robinson Creek and the Section 20, T. 13 N., R. 13 W.;
( 3 ) The boundary then proceeds in a straight line in a southeasterly direction to the summit of Sanel Mountain, located at the southeast corner of Section 30, T. 13 N., R. 12 W., on the Yorkville quadrangle map;
( 4 ) The boundary then proceeds in a straight line in a southeasterly direction until it reaches the southeast corner of Section 15, T. 12 N., R 11 W., on the Hopland quadrangle map;
( 5 ) The boundary then proceeds south, following the eastern boundaries of Sections 22 and 27, T. 12 N., R 11 W., until it reaches the Mendocino-Sonoma County line on the Cloverdale quadrangle map;
( 6 ) The boundary then follows the Mendocino-Sonoma county line west, south and west until it reaches the southwest corner of Section 32, T. 12 N., R. 11 W.;
( 7 ) The boundary then diverges from the county line and proceeds in a northwesterly direction, traversing the Big Foot Mountain quadrangle map, until it reaches the southwest corner of Section 5, T. 12 N., R. 13 W. on the Ornbaun Valley quadrangle map;
( 8 ) The boundary proceeds in a straight line in a northerly direction until it reaches the beginning point at Benchmark 680.
[T.D. ATF-397, 63 FR 16904, Apr. 7, 1998]
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY ELEV

 1,052.49

 1,052.51

 1,052.46

 1,052.38

 1,052.32

 1,052.18

 1,052.04

 1,052.00

 1,052.00

 1,051.99

 1,052.00

 1,051.99

 1,051.93

 1,051.89

 1,051.92

 1,052.00

 1,051.84

 1,051.75

 1,051.78

 1,051.68

 1,051.54

 1,051.39

 1,051.36

 1,051.15

 1,051.03

 1,051.06

 1,050.96

 1,050.77

 1,050.68

 1,050.58

 1,050.32

 2,002.5

 2,002.7

 2,002.1

 2,001.2

 2,000.6

 1,999.0

 1,997.5

 1,997.0

 1,997.0

 1,996.9

 1,997.0

 1,996.9

 1,996.3

 1,995.8

 1,996.1

 1,997.0

 1,995.3

 1,994.3

 1,994.6

 1,993.5

 1,991.9

 1,990.3

 1,990.0

 1,987.6

 1,986.3

 1,986.7

 1,985.6

 1,983.5

 1,982.5

 1,981.4

 1,978.5

STORAGE

+1.3

+0.2

-0.6

-0.9

-0.7

-1.6

-1.6

-0.4

+0.0

-0.1

+0.1

-0.1

-0.7

-0.4

+0.3

+0.9

-1.8

-1.0

+0.3

-1.1

-1.5

-1.7

-0.3

-2.3

-1.3

+0.3

-1.1

-2.1

-1.0

-1.1

-2.9

CHANGE

1,094

1,052

885

961

1,067

903

983

1,033

1,251

1,113

1,116

1,205

1,522

1,495

1,484

1,592

1,387

1,499

1,465

1,560

1,186

1,242

1,136

959

978

1,454

1,158

1,013

1,059

995

889

INFLOW

 420

 912

 1,139

 1,354

 1,280

 1,684

 1,764

 1,256

 1,251

 1,143

 982

 1,253

 1,795

 1,663

 1,263

 1,090

 2,202

 1,939

 1,259

 2,038

 1,947

 2,033

 1,282

 2,067

 1,603

 1,255

 1,657

 2,035

 1,526

 1,536

 2,249

POWER

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

SPILL

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

OUTLET

 4

 29

 25

 54

 122

 0

 0

 0

 0

 25

 79

 7

 61

 54

 54

 57

 75

 61

 39

 79

 18

 43

 21

 61

 43

 32

 57

 32

 32

 14

 82

C.F.S.

 .01

 .08

 .07

 .15

 .34

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .07

 .22

 .02

 .17

 .15

 .15

 .16

 .21

 .17

 .11

 .22

 .05

 .12

 .06

 .17

 .12

 .09

 .16

 .09

 .09

 .04

 .23

INCHES

 .00

 .40

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .52

 .04

 .03

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .71

 .02

 .02

 .00

 .00

PRECIP

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

MARCH 2007 NEW MELONES LAKE DAILY OPERATIONS RUN DATE: June 7, 2007

IN LAKE

EVAPORATION

INCHES

C.F.S.

COMPUTED*

1000 ACRE-FEET

RELEASE - C.F.S.

TOTALS -22.9 36,736 46,877 0 0 1,260 3.52 1.74

ACRE-FEET -22,900 72,866 92,981 0 0 2,499

COMMENTS:

SUMMARY

RELEASE (ACRE-FEET)

POWER 92,981

SPILL 0

OUTLET

TOTAL

 0

 92,981

PRECIPITATION

THIS MONTH =

TO DATE =

 1.74

JULY 1, 2006 17.24

 2,001.1

Table 13
## F IRST 

## D ISTRICT 

## C OURT OF 

## A PPEAL 

## S TATE OF 

## F LORIDA

_____________________________
No. 1D2023

- 0904

_____________________________
F LORIDA E VERBLADES , LLC and T RI

- S TATE I NSURANCE C OMPANY OF M INNESOTA , Appellant s ,

v.

M ITCH V ANDERGUNST , Appellee.

_____________________________

On appeal from the Office of the Judges of Compensation Claims. Jack Weiss , Judge

. Date of Accident: February 15, 2019

.

February 21, 2024

P ER C URIAM

.
A FFIRMED

.
O STERHAUS , C.J., and R OBERTS and M.K. T HOMAS , JJ.
, concur

.2 _____________________________ Not final until disposition of any timely and authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 9.331

.

_____________________________

Richard W. Ervin, IV and Robert W. Bleakley of Bleakley Bavol Denman & Grace, Tampa
, for Appellant s

. Michael J. Winer of Winer Law Group, Tampa
, for Appellee.
Editorial Note on Part 44
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 44 appear by T.D. ATF-464, 66 FR 43480, Aug. 20, 2001, and T.D. ATF-480, 67 FR 30801-30803, May 8, 2002.

§ 44.61 Removals, withdrawals, and shipments authorized. ( a ) Tobacco products and cigarette papers and tubes may be removed from a factory or from an export warehouse, and cigars may be withdrawn from a customs bonded warehouse, without payment of tax for direct exportation or for delivery for subsequent exportation, in accordance with the provisions of this part.
( b ) Tobacco products and cigarette papers and tubes are eligible for removal or transfer in bond under this part only if they bear the marks, labels, and notices required by this part.
[78 FR 38573, June 27, 2013]
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY HIGH

 7,516

 6,700

 8,652

 10,147

 8,130

 8,443

 8,175

 7,548

 6,467

 6,399

 6,506

 6,464

 5,355

 6,308

 8,843

 9,212

 9,539

 9,357

 9,067

 8,612

 7,419

 6,638

 6,804

 6,230

 5,971

 6,057

 6,268

 6,841

 6,599

 7,057

 7,274

 2,113

 2,459

 2,479

 2,721

 2,930

 2,723

 2,081

 2,117

 2,031

 2,070

 2,131

 2,159

 2,077

 2,185

 2,113

 2,757

 3,489

 3,327

 3,495

 3,586

 3,187

 3,091

 2,796

 2,779

 2,480

 2,484

 2,901

 2,903

 2,865

 2,924

 3,115

 4,176

 4,824

 5,158

 5,636

 4,997

 4,852

 4,938

 4,554

 4,302

 4,217

 4,422

 4,095

 3,765

 4,044

 4,854

 5,773

 6,208

 6,047

 6,123

 6,069

 5,361

 4,983

 4,591

 4,438

 4,157

 4,185

 4,400

 4,658

 4,777

 4,879

 5,047

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

OCTOBER 2012 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: February 7, 2013

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

PITTSBURG BOTTOM ON THE SACRAMENTO RIVER
(No. 6824

#### Robeson’s Department Store, Claimant, *vs.*State of Illinois, Department of Mental Health, Respondent.

*Opinion filed September 19, 1972.*

Robeson’s Department Store, Claimant, pro se.

William J. Scott, Attorney General; William E. Webber, Assistant Attorney General, for Respondent.

Perlin, C.J.
### §356e. Drug shortage list

#### (a) Establishment

The Secretary shall maintain an up-to-date list of drugs that are determined by the Secretary to be in shortage in the United States.

#### (b) Contents

For each drug on such list, the Secretary shall include the following information:

(1) The name of the drug in shortage, including the National Drug Code number for such drug.

(2) The name of each manufacturer of such drug.

(3) The reason for the shortage, as determined by the Secretary, selecting from the following categories:

(A) Requirements related to complying with good manufacturing practices.

(B) Regulatory delay.

(C) Shortage of an active ingredient.

(D) Shortage of an inactive ingredient component.

(E) Discontinuance of the manufacture of the drug.

(F) Delay in shipping of the drug.

(G) Demand increase for the drug.

(4) The estimated duration of the shortage as determined by the Secretary.

#### (c) Public availability

#### (1) In general

Subject to paragraphs (2) and (3), the Secretary shall make the information in such list publicly available.

#### (2) Trade secrets and confidential information

Nothing in this section alters or amends section 1905 of title 18 or section 552(b)(4) of title 5.

#### (3) Public health exception

The Secretary may choose not to make information collected under this section publicly available under paragraph (1) or section 356c(c) of this title if the Secretary determines that disclosure of such information would adversely affect the public health (such as by increasing the possibility of hoarding or other disruption of the availability of drug products to patients).

#### (d) Interagency notification

Not later than 180 days after March 27, 2020, and every 90 days thereafter, the Secretary shall transmit a report regarding the drugs of the current drug shortage list under this section to the Administrator of the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services.

(June 25, 1938, ch. 675, §506E, as added Pub. L. 112–144, title X, §1004, July 9, 2012, 126 Stat. 1104; amended Pub. L. 114–255, div. A, title III, §3101(a)(2)(G), Dec. 13, 2016, 130 Stat. 1153; Pub. L. 116–136, div. A, title III, §3112(c), Mar. 27, 2020, 134 Stat. 362.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

2020—Subsec. (d). Pub. L. 116–136 added subsec. (d).

2016—Subsec. (b)(3)(E). Pub. L. 114–255, which directed substitution of "discontinuance" for "discontinuation", was executed by substituting "Discontinuance" for "Discontinuation" to reflect the probable intent of Congress.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date of 2020 Amendment

Amendment by Pub. L. 116–136 effective 180 days after Mar. 27, 2020, see section 3112(g) of Pub. L. 116–136, set out as a note under section 356c of this title.
### SUBCHAPTER III—NATIONAL DRUG ABUSE STRATEGY
### §§866 to 866d. Omitted

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Sections were omitted in the general revision of title V of the Elementary and Secondary Education Act of 1965, Pub. L. 89–10, title V, Apr. 11, 1965, 79 Stat. 47, by Pub. L. 95–561, title V, §501, Nov. 1, 1978, 92 Stat. 2240.

Section 866, Pub. L. 89–10, title V, §521, as added Pub. L. 91–230, title I, §143(a)(4)(D), Apr. 13, 1970, 84 Stat. 142; amended Pub. L. 93–380, title I, §104(b), Aug. 21, 1974, 88 Stat. 503; Pub. L. 95–112, §2(e)(2), Sept. 24, 1977, 91 Stat. 911, authorized appropriations for grants to local educational agencies for fiscal years ending prior to Oct. 1, 1979.

A prior section 866, Pub. L. 89–10, title V, §506, Apr. 11, 1965, 79 Stat. 51, provided for payments to States: installments; advances or reimbursement; and adjustments, prior to repeal by Pub. L. 91–230, title I, §143(a)(4)(A), Apr. 13, 1970, 84 Stat. 142.

Section 866a, Pub. L. 89–10, title V, §522, as added Pub. L. 91–230, title I, §143(a)(4)(D), Apr. 13, 1970, 84 Stat. 143; amended Pub. L. 93–380, title VIII, §843(a)(2), (3), Aug. 21, 1974, 88 Stat. 611, related to the apportionment of grant funds among States.

Section 866b, Pub. L. 89–10, title V, §523, as added Pub. L. 91–230, title I, §143(a)(4)(D), Apr. 13, 1970, 84 Stat. 143, related to grants from apportioned funds and to the programs and activities covered.

Section 866c, Pub. L. 89–10, title V, §524, as added Pub. L. 91–230, title I, §143(a)(4)(D), Apr. 13, 1970, 84 Stat. 144, related to the approval of applications by the Commissioner.

Section 866d, Pub. L. 89–10, title V, §525, as added Pub. L. 91–230, title I, §143(a)(4)(D), Apr. 13, 1970, 84 Stat. 144, related to the approval of applications by State educational agencies.
§ 10.321 What happens if the opinion of the physician selected by OWCP differs from the opinion of the physician selected by the employee? ( a ) If one medical opinion holds more probative value, OWCP will base its determination of entitlement on that medical conclusion (see § 10.502). A difference in medical opinion sufficient to be considered a conflict occurs when two reports of virtually equal weight and rationale reach opposing conclusions (see *James P. Roberts,* 31 ECAB 1010 (1980)).
( b ) If a conflict exists between the medical opinion of the employee's physician and the medical opinion of either a second opinion physician or an OWCP medical adviser or consultant, OWCP shall appoint a third physician to make an examination (see § 10.502). This is called a referee or impartial examination. OWCP will select a physician who is qualified in the appropriate specialty and who has had no prior connection with the case. The employee is not entitled to have anyone present at the examination unless OWCP decides that exceptional circumstances exist. For example, where a hearing-impaired employee needs an interpreter, the presence of an interpreter would be allowed. Also, a case file may be sent for referee or impartial medical review where there is no need for an actual examination, or where the employee is deceased.
EXHIBIT 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the quarterly report of Feminique Corporation (the "COMPANY")
on Form 10-QSB for the period ended June 30, 2003 as filed with the SEC on the
date hereof (the "REPORT"), I hereby certify, in my capacity as an officer of
the Company, for purposes of 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:

(1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
     of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
     respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

                                    FEMINIQUE CORPORATION


                              By:   /s/     Max Khan
                                    ----------------
                                    Max Khan
                                    Chief Executive Officer
                                    Chief Financial Officer
                                    December 7, 2003





                                  End of Filing


<PAGE>
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY HIGH

 13,533

 12,256

 10,520

 9,315

 8,239

 9,058

 8,177

 8,739

 8,638

 8,625

 8,013

 6,660

 5,496

 5,523

 5,692

 5,018

 5,264

 4,239

 2,811

 2,286

 2,879

 4,032

 4,983

 5,933

 4,716

 5,488

 6,039

 5,971

 6,657

 5,670

 4,535

 2,531

 2,370

 2,233

 2,366

 2,013

 2,471

 2,393

 2,149

 1,777

 1,389

 1,058

 909

 834

 817

 826

 862

 945

 870

 713

 716

 662

 640

 617

 678

 640

 593

 686

 771

 877

 761

 749

 6,527

 6,031

 5,609

 5,390

 4,905

 4,687

 4,451

 4,294

 3,880

 3,427

 2,848

 2,323

 2,161

 2,107

 2,167

 2,273

 2,679

 2,200

 1,673

 1,340

 1,197

 1,318

 1,860

 2,153

 1,931

 2,045

 2,446

 2,634

 2,511

 2,108

 1,848

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

AUGUST 2019 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: September 10, 2019

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

PITTSBURG TOP ON THE SACRAMENTO RIVER
#### Charles Tyroler, II, as Executor of Emma Heyman, Deceased, Appellant, v. Sidney W. Heyman, Respondent.

Order, so far as appealed from, unanimously affirmed, with $20 costs and disbursements. Ho opinion. Present — Peck, P. J., Glennon, Dore, Cohn and Callahan, JJ.
Exhibit 99.1

                   Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
                           As Adopted Pursuant to Section 906
                            Of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

   In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Presidential
 Realty Corporation (the "Company") for the period ending March 31, 2003, as
 filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
 "Report"), I Jeffrey F. Joseph, Chief Executive Officer of the Company,
 certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section
 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:

   (1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
   15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934: and

   (2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
   respects, the financial condition and the results of operations of the
   Company.




                                         Presidential Realty Corporation

                                         By: /s/ Jeffrey F. Joseph
                                           -----------------------
                                            Jeffrey F. Joseph
                                            Chief Executive Officer




  Date: May 14, 2003
#### Nathan Greenbaum, Appellant, v. Eli Gross et al., Respondents.

Action to recover a payment made on account of purchase of a store. Order denying motion of plaintiff to dismiss a counterclaim for damages as in excess of liquidated damages provided in a contract of the parties, insofar as appealed from, affirmed, with $10 costs and disbursements. Determination of the question as to whether or not the allegation in respect of damages is limited by the contract provisions relating to liquidated damages must await the trial. Lewis, P. J., Carswell, Johnston, Adel and Wenzel, JJ, concur.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

DAY HIGH

 6,810

 6,022

 4,186

 2,658

 3,835

 4,187

 5,023

 4,801

 4,932

 4,974

 5,543

 4,440

 3,681

 3,356

 1,776

 1,219

 1,069

 1,215

 2,826

 4,709

 6,617

 8,120

 9,308

 9,375

 8,857

 9,721

 9,672

 9,925

 7,361

 6,232

 632

 705

 606

 658

 680

 701

 826

 849

 736

 714

 691

 609

 522

 524

 474

 405

 350

 339

 352

 435

 846

 1,276

 1,918

 1,593

 1,069

 1,077

 1,181

 814

 752

 681

 2,357

 2,287

 1,949

 1,457

 1,537

 1,677

 2,166

 1,972

 1,875

 1,700

 1,844

 1,443

 1,337

 1,298

 981

 777

 654

 686

 1,243

 2,214

 3,240

 3,973

 4,840

 4,217

 3,762

 3,508

 4,032

 4,070

 2,966

 2,502

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

APRIL 2009 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: May 1, 2009

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

PITTSBURG BOTTOM ON THE SACRAMENTO RIVER
## COURT OF APPEALS

SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS

FORT WORTH

NO. 02

- 12

- 00175

- CR

Robert Hendrickson

v.

The State of Texas §

§

§

§

§ From County Court at Law No. 2

o f Wichita Co unty (54616

- F )

May 8, 2014

Opinion by Justice Dauphinot

(nfp)



### JUDGMENT

This court has considered the record on appeal in this case and holds that

there was no error in the trial court’s judgment. It is ordered that the judgment of

the trial court is affirmed.

SECOND DISTRICT COURT OF APPEALS

By

_ /s/ Lee Ann Dauphinot

______________ Justice Lee Ann Dauphinot
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### National Aeronautics and Space Administration

          - [Notice: (11-039)]

# AGENCY:

National Aeronautics and Space Administration.

# ACTION:

Notice of meeting.

# SUMMARY:

In accordance with the Federal Advisory Committee Act, Public Law 92-463, as amended, the National Aeronautics and Space Administration announces a meeting of the NASA Advisory Council.

# DATES:

Thursday, May 5, 2011, 8 a.m.-5 p.m., Local Time

Friday, May 6, 2011, 8 a.m.-12 p.m., Local Time.

      ( print page 21073)    

# ADDRESSES:

Ohio Aerospace Institute, The President's Room, 22800 Cedar Point Road, Cleveland, OH 44142.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Ms. Marla King, NAC Administrative Officer, National Aeronautics and Space Administration Headquarters, Washington, DC 20546, 202/358-1148.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

The agenda for the meeting will include reports from the NAC Committees:

—Aeronautics

—Audit, Finance and Analysis

—Commercial Space

—Education and Public Outreach

—Exploration

—Information Technology Infrastructure

—Science

—Space Operations

—Technology and Innovation

The meeting will be open to the public up to the seating capacity of the room. It is imperative that the meeting be held on this date to accommodate the scheduling priorities of the key participants.

Dated: April 8, 2011.

P. Diane Rausch,

Advisory Committee Management Officer, National Aeronautics and Space Administration.

[FR Doc. 2011-9035 Filed 4-13-11; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 7510-13-P
§ 226.61 Use of military service. ( a ) *Claim for use of military service.* An employee is deemed to have filed a claim for the use of military service and earnings as service and compensation under the Railroad Retirement Act if— ( 1 ) The employee indicates on the annuity application or another signed statement that he or she has military service;
( 2 ) The employee does not specifically request that the military service be credited as wages under the Social Security Act;
( 3 ) The military service is creditable under the Railroad Retirement Act, as shown in part 212 of this chapter; and
( 4 ) Using the military service as railroad service and compensation would be to the employee's advantage (the employee and his or her family would receive higher total benefits than if the military service were credited under the Social Security Act).
( b ) *Effective date for use of military service.* Military service can be used as service and compensation under the Railroad Retirement Act starting with the date the annuity begins but no earlier than twelve months before the employee files an application or statement showing that he or she has military service.