alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND
EXCHANGE COMMISSIONWashington, D.C. 20549 FORM 8-K/A (Amendment
No. 1)
 CURRENT REPORT
Pursuant to
Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 Date of Report (Date of earliest
event reported): May 19, 2011 BLUELINX HOLDINGS
INC.(Exact name of registrant as
specified in its charter) Delaware
  
  001-32383
  
  77-0627356(State or other Jurisdiction of Incorporation)
  
  (Commission File Number)
  
  (IRS Employer Identification No.) 4300 Wildwood Parkway,
Atlanta, Georgia
  
  30339(Address of Principal Executive Offices)
  
  (Zip Code) Registrant’s telephone number,
including area code: (770) 953-7000 Not
applicable(Former name or former address if changed since last report.) Check the appropriate box below if the
Form 8-K filing is intended to simultaneously satisfy the filing obligation of
the registrant under any of the following provisions: o Written
communications pursuant to Rule 425 under the Securities Act (17 CFR
230.425)o Soliciting material pursuant
to Rule 14a-12 under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.14a-12)o Pre-commencement communications pursuant to Rule
14d-2(b) under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.14d-2(b))o Pre-commencement communications pursuant to Rule
13e-4(c) under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.13e-4(c))
  1




---



##### 



Item 5.07 Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders
     Number of VotesNominees
    
    Number of Votes For
    
    
    Withheld
    
    
    Broker Non-VotesHoward S. Cohen
    
    
    23,822,721
    
    
    
    3,600,649
    
    
    
    2,944,619Richard S. Grant
    
    
    25,433,548
    
    
    
    1,989,822
    
    
    
    2,944,619George R. Judd
    
    
    25,815,503
    
    
    
    1,607,867
    
    
    
    2,944,619Steven F. Mayer
    
    
    23,989,356
    
    
    
    3,484,014
    
    
    
    2,944,619Charles H. McElrea
    
    
    23,870,445
    
    
    
    3,552,925
    
    
    
    2,944,619Alan H. Schumacher
    
    
    25,429,348
    
    
    
    1,994,022
    
    
    
    2,944,619Robert G. Warden
    
    
    23,932,856
    
    
    
    3,490,514
    
    
    
    2,944,619M. Richard Warner
    
    
    23,940,256
    
    
    
    3,483,114
    
    
    
    2,944,619
  For
    
    Against
    
    Abstain30,303,838
    
    57,551
    
    6,600
  For
    
    Against
    
    Abstain
    
    Broker Non-Vote23,206,432
    
    3,959,945
    
    257,993
    
    2,943,619
  For
    
    Against
    
    Abstain
    
    Broker Non-Vote27,067,306
    
    313,846
    
    43,218
    
    2,943,619




---



##### 



For
    
    Against
    
    Abstain
    
    Broker Non-Vote27,207,227
    
    167,129
    
    50,014
    
    2,943,619
  1 Year
    
    2 Years
    
    3 Years
    
    Abstain
    
    Broker Non-Vote24,292,581
    
    243,893
    
    2,863,402
    
    24,494
    
    2,943,619




---



##### 



SIGNATURES
  BLUELINX HOLDINGS INC.By:
    /s/ Sara E. EpsteinSara E. EpsteinSecretary
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              Dec-31-1995
<PERIOD-END>                                   Sep-30-1996
<CASH>                                                  94
<SECURITIES>                                             0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        3,222
<ALLOWANCES>                                           249
<INVENTORY>                                            188
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     3,922
<PP&E>                                              36,836
<DEPRECIATION>                                      19,726
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                      26,710
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                3,444
<BONDS>                                              9,196
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                    0
<PREFERRED>                                              0
<COMMON>                                               455
<OTHER-SE>                                           6,895
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                        26,710
<SALES>                                                  0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                    10,124
<CGS>                                                    0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        8,225
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                      (33)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                         0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                     477
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                      1,524
<INCOME-TAX>                                           558
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                    966
<DISCONTINUED>                                           0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                          0
<CHANGES>                                              131
<NET-INCOME>                                         1,097
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                         2.52
<EPS-DILUTED>                                         2.52
        


</TABLE>
**Exhibit 99.1**

 

 

December 31, 2005

 

 

 

To the Addresses listed on Schedule I hereto.

 

 

Ladies and Gentlemen:

 

                This AnnualStatement as to Compliance is delivered to you pursuant to Section 4.10 (a) ofthe Sale and Servicing Agreement dated as of April 6, 2005 (the “Agreement”)and pursuant to Section 3.9 of the Indenture Agreement dated as of April 6,2005 (the “Indenture), executed in connection with the formation of AmeriCreditAutomobile Receivables Trust 2005-1 (the “Trust”), the issuance of the Notes bythe Trust and the closing of the transactions and the execution and delivery ofthe various documents by AmeriCredit Corp., AmeriCredit Financial Services,Inc. (the “Servicer”) and AFS SenSub Corp. in connection therewith.  The capitalized terms used herein shall havethe same meanings as in the Agreement.

 

                The undersignedcertifies that I am the Executive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer andTreasurer of the Servicer.  I furthercertify as follows:

 

1.     I have conducted, or caused to be conducted under mysupervision, a review of the Servicer during the preceding period from April 6,2005 through December 31, 2005, and its performance under the Agreement.

 

2.     To the best of my knowledge, following such review,the Servicer has fulfilled all its obligations under the Agreement throughoutsuch period, and, to the best of my knowledge, there has been no default in thefulfillment of any such obligation.

 

 

 

AmeriCredit Financial Services, Inc.

 

 
| By:    | /s/ Chris A. Choate                   |   | Dated: February 28, 2006 |
|--------|---------------------------------------|--------|--------------------------|
|   | Chris A. Choate                       |   |                     |
|   | Executive Vice President,             |   |                     |
|   | Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer |   |                     |

 

----

 

Schedule I

 

 

Trustee, Trust Collateral Agent:

 

JPMorgan Chase Bank

Global Debt/Asset Backed Securities

4 New York Plaza, 6th Floor

New York, NY 10004

Attention: Aranka Paul

 

Backup Servicer:

 

Systems & Services Technologies, Inc.

4315 Picket Road

St. Joseph, MO 64503

Attention: Alice Derr

 

Owner Trustee:

 

Wilmington Trust Company

Rodney Square North

1100 North Market Street

Wilmington, DE 19890-0001

Attention: Steve Barone

 

Rating Agencies:

 

Moody’s Investors Service, Inc.

99 Church Street

New York, NY 10007

Attention: ABS Monitoring Department

 

Standard & Poor’s Rating Services

55 Water Street

40th Floor

New York, NY 10041

Attention: Asset Backed Surveillance Department

 

Fitch, Inc.

One State Street Plaza, 32nd Floor

New York, New York 10014

Attention:  AutoSurveillance Department

 

----
#### § 345.401 General rule.

Effective January 1, 1990, all benefits paid to an employee for his or her days of unemployment or days of sickness will be charged to the base year employer of such employee, except as hereinafter provided in this part. The Board will make the charge by adding the gross amount of the benefits payable to an employee on the basis of a claim for benefits to that employee's base year employer's cumulative benefit balance. The benefit charge does not depend on whether the employee receiving the benefit payment is a current employee of the base year employer.
§ 220.102 Non-severe impairment(s), defined. ( a ) *Non-severe impairment(s).* An impairment or combination of impairments is not severe if it does not significantly limit the claimant's physical or mental ability to do basic work activities.
( b ) *Basic work activities.* Basic work activities means the ability and aptitudes necessary to do most jobs. Examples of these include— ( 1 ) Physical functions such as walking, standing, sitting, lifting, pushing, pulling, reaching, carrying, or handling;
( 2 ) Capacities for seeing, hearing, and speaking;
( 3 ) Understanding, carrying out, and remembering simple instructions;
( 4 ) Use of judgment;
( 5 ) Responding appropriately to supervision, co-workers and usual work situations; and
( 6 ) Dealing with changes in a routine work setting.
#### § 24.306 Distilling material or vinegar stock record.

A proprietor who produces or receives wine containing excess water which will be used expressly as distilling material or vinegar stock shall maintain a record by transaction date showing the amount and kind produced, received, from whom received, removed, and to whom sent. The proprietor shall keep a record of each type of material from which the distilling material or vinegar stock was fermented (e.g., grape, apple, strawberry). The volume of distilling material or vinegar stock produced, including wine lees refermented for use as distilling material, will be recorded upon removal from fermenting tanks. However, the provisions of this section do not apply to standard wine or unwatered wine lees recorded on the proprietor's record of bulk still wine and bulk still hard cider and removed for use as distilling material or vinegar stock.

(Sec. 201, Pub. L. 85-859, 72 Stat. 1381, as amended (26 U.S.C. 5367))

(Approved by the Office of Management and Budget under control number 1513-0115)

[T.D. ATF-299, 55 FR 24989, June 19, 1990, as amended by T.D. ATF-312, 56 FR 31083, July 9, 1991; T.D. TTB-147, 82 FR 7665, Jan. 23, 2017]
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 04-4902

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee,
versus CURTIS DAVIS, JR., a/k/a Billy Dee, Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Orangeburg. Patrick Michael Duffy, District Judge. (CR-03-391) Submitted: January 26, 2007 Decided: February 20, 2007 Before WILLIAMS and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. William N. Nettles, Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellant. Jonathan S. Gasser, United States Attorney, Carlton R. Bourne, Jr., Assistant United States Attorney, Charleston, South Carolina, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.* We offer no criticism of the district judge, who followed the law and procedure in effect at the time Davis was sentenced. - 2 - PER CURIAM: Curtis Davis, Jr., was found guilty by a jury of conspiracy to possess with intent to distribute and distributing five kilograms or more of cocaine and fifty grams or more of cocaine base (Count 1) and money laundering under 18 U.S.C. § 1956(a)(1) (2000) (Count 11). Adopting the recommendations in the presentence report, the district court sentenced Davis to a life sentence for Count 1 and a 240-month concurrent sentence for Count 11. At the sentencing hearing, the district court stated that, even if the Federal Sentencing Guidelines were to be found “nonbinding,” it would give Davis an identical alternative sentence. (J.A. 59). The court referenced the 18 U.S.C.A. § 3553(a) (West 2000 & Supp. 2006) factors in its criminal judgment. On appeal, Davis alleges he was sentenced in violation of Blakely v. Washington , 542 U.S. 296 (2004), and United States v. Booker , 543 U.S. 220 (2005). For the reasons that follow, we affirm. Davis alleges that he was sentenced based on facts not found by the jury or admitted by him in violation of Blakelyand Booker . Because Davis timely objected on this basis in the district court, we review his claim for harmless error. * United States v. Rodriguez , 433 F.3d 411, 415-16 (4th Cir. 2006); United States v.- 3 - Mackins , 315 F.3d 399, 405 (4th Cir. 2003). We find no harmless error, however, as the district court stated it would have given Davis an identical sentence even if the Sentencing Guidelines were found to be advisory. United States v. Shatley , 448 F.3d 264, 267-68 (4th Cir.), cert. denied , 127 S. Ct. 310 (2006) (holding that in light of dis trict court’s finding that it would impose an identical alternative sentence, any Sixth Amendment Bookererror was harmless). Accordingly, we affirm Davis’ sentence. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
htgm-ex104_16.htm



EXHIBIT 10.4

AMENDMENT No. 2 TO SUPPLEMENT AGREEMENT

This Amendment No. 2 To Supplement Agreement ("Amendment 2") is effective July 2, 2018 ("Amendment 2 Effective Date") and is made by and between QIAGEN Manchester Limited, (“QIAGEN"), HTG Molecular Diagnostics, Inc., ("HTG”) and Bristol-Myers Squibb Company (“BMS").

WHEREAS, BMS, QAGEN and HTG entered Into a Supplement Agreement having an effective date of June 2,

2017 and entered into Amendment No. 1 to Supplement Agreement having an effective date of November 21, 2017 (such agreement, as amended, the "Supplement Agreement"); and

Whereas, BMS, QIAGEN and HTG want to further amend the Supplement Agreement,

NOW THEREFORE, for good and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which Is hereby acknowledged, QIAGEN HTG and BMS agree as follows:

1. The sixth paragraph on page one of the Supplement Agreement Is replaced with the following:

WHEREAS, QIAGEN wants to engage HTG to perform certain of the work that Is part of the Project and, HTG is willing to perform the work designated to HTG in the Project Plan (as that term is defined in the Initiation Agreement), as amended by Amendment No. 1 to Project Plan having an effective date of July 2, 2018 and by Amendment No, 2 to Project Plan having an effective date of August 10, 2018, in the form provided to HTG by QIAGEN on October 30, 2017, August 2, 2018 (relating to Amendment No. 1 to Project Plan), and August 9, 2018 (relating to Amendment No. 2 to Project Plan) (the "Work), and BMS is willing to allow QIAGEN to engage HTG to perform the Work;


	
 
	
2.
	
This Amendment 2 shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws stipulated in the Supplement Agreement,





	
 
	
3.
	
Except as expressly set forth herein, all the terms and conditions of the Supplement Agreement shall remain unchanged and in full force and effect.





	
 
	
4.
	
This Amendment 2 may be executed in two (2) or more counterparts, each of which shall be deemed an original, but all of which together shall constitute one (1) and the same Instrument. This Amendment 2 may be executed by facsimile or electronic (e.g., .pdf) signatures and such signatures shall be deemed to bind each Party hereto as if they were original signatures.




— Signature page to follow—

Page 1 of 2



 

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, BMS, QIAGEN and HTG have caused this Amendment 2 to be signed by their duly authorized representatives, effective as of the Amendment 2 Effective Date.

 

Bristol-Meyers Squibb Company

By: /s/ George A. Green

Name: George A. Green

Title: Head, Pharmacodiagnostics

Date: August 13, 2018

 

QIAGEN Manchester Limited

By: /s/ Thierry Bernard 

Name: Thierry Bernard 

Title: Sr. VP, Business Area MDx

Date: August 14, 2018

 

HTG Molecular Diagnostics, Inc.

By: /s/ Timothy B. Johnson 

Name: Timothy B. Johnson 

Title: President and Chief Executive Officer 

Date: August 15, 2018

 

 

Page 2 of 2
```

[Congressional Bills 114th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 3810 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

114th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 3810

  To amend title 23, United States Code, and SAFETEA-LU to direct the 
   Secretary of Transportation to give preference to certain surface 
transportation projects that achieve cost efficiencies through the use 
of project development, finance, operations, and delivery methods, such 
                as design-build, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            October 22, 2015

  Mr. Sean Patrick Maloney of New York introduced the following bill; 
       which was referred to the Committee on Transportation and 
                             Infrastructure

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To amend title 23, United States Code, and SAFETEA-LU to direct the 
   Secretary of Transportation to give preference to certain surface 
transportation projects that achieve cost efficiencies through the use 
of project development, finance, operations, and delivery methods, such 
                as design-build, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Design-Build Incentive Act of 
2015''.

SEC. 2. SELECTION OF TIFIA PROJECTS.

    Section 602(b) of title 23, United States Code, is amended by 
adding at the end the following:
            ``(4) Use of innovative project development and delivery 
        methods.--In selecting among eligible projects, the Secretary 
        shall give preference to those applicants for a project who 
        demonstrate that the project will achieve cost efficiencies 
        through the use of innovative project development, finance, 
        operations, or delivery methods, such as design-build.''.

SEC. 3. SELECTION OF PROJECTS OF NATIONAL AND REGIONAL SIGNIFICANCE.

    Section 1301(f)(3) of SAFETEA-LU (Public Law 109-59; 23 U.S.C. 101 
note) is amended--
            (1) by redesignating subparagraphs (B) and (C) as 
        subparagraphs (C) and (D), respectively; and
            (2) by inserting after subparagraph (A) the following:
                    ``(B) shall give preference to project applications 
                that demonstrate that the project will achieve cost 
                efficiencies through the use of innovative project 
                development, finance, operations, or delivery methods, 
                such as design-build;''.
                                 <all>
```
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY HIGH

 26,522

 25,257

 25,029

 24,811

 23,733

 20,872

 20,843

 22,384

 24,362

 25,540

 25,039

 24,569

 25,521

 25,923

 25,609

 24,831

 24,721

 25,020

 24,752

 24,783

 23,533

 23,422

 23,895

 24,756

 26,873

 28,140

 27,824

 27,205

 26,657

 26,362

 26,016

 10,423

 10,141

 10,552

 10,636

 9,843

 10,721

 11,063

 11,421

 12,964

 14,130

 12,575

 10,850

 10,866

 10,584

 10,490

 10,076

 10,615

 11,091

 11,639

 12,230

 12,359

 12,479

 12,644

 12,646

 12,404

 12,402

 12,448

 12,285

 12,149

 12,426

 13,349

 18,113

 17,658

 17,579

 17,450

 16,537

 16,273

 16,375

 16,423

 17,482

 18,497

 17,155

 16,814

 17,515

 17,949

 17,263

 17,145

 17,311

 17,942

 18,270

 18,167

 18,264

 17,492

 17,219

 16,853

 17,714

 19,231

 19,260

 19,096

 18,925

 19,056

 19,348

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

AUGUST 2016 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: September 15, 2016

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

PORT CHICAGO BOTTOM IN SUISUN BAY
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Charles Berezak, Appellant.

All concur.
EXHIBIT 11a


                              AMERITECH CORPORATION
                    COMPUTATION OF PRIMARY EARNINGS PER SHARE
                                        
                                        
                                           Three Months Ended
                                                   March 31
                                             -------------
                                          1997              1996
                                          ----              ----
Net income                           $536,138,000      $478,345,000
                                     ============      ============


Weighted average number of
shares outstanding                    550,526,956       554,751,737

Additional dilutive effect of
outstanding options (as determined
by the application of the treasury
stock method)                           2,567,760         3,034,266
                                     ------------      ------------

Weighted average shares outstanding
on which primary earnings per share
are based                             553,094,716       557,786,003
                                     ============      ============
Primary earnings per share                  $0.97             $0.86
                                     ============      ============


This calculation is submitted in accordance with Regulation S-K,Item
601(b)11, although not required by footnote 2 to paragraph 14 of Accounting
Principles Board Opinion No. 15 because it results in dilution of less than
three percent.


Amounts for the prior year have been restated to reflect inclusion of the
windfall tax benefit when applying the treasury stock method to determine
the dilutive effect of outstanding options.