alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**Exhibit 32.2**

**Certification bythe Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**

Pursuantto 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, I, the undersigned Chief Financial Officer ofGenzyme Corporation (the “Company”), hereby certify that the Quarterly Reporton Form 10-Q of the Company for the quarter ended March 31,2007 (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained inthe Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial conditionand results of operations of the Company.
| /s/ MICHAEL  S. WYZGA     |   |
|---------------------------|--------|
| *Chief Financial Officer* |
| May 8, 2007          |

 

----
§ 9.91 Walla Walla Valley. ( a ) *Name.* The name of the viticultural area described in this section is “Walla Walla Valley.”
( b ) *Approved maps.* The appropriate maps for determining the boundaries of the Walla Walla Valley viticultural area are two U.S.G.S. maps, in the scale 1:100,000. They are entitled: ( 1 ) “Walla Walla,” Washington-Oregon, 1980
( 2 ) “Pendleton,” Oregon-Washington, 1983
( c ) *Boundaries.* The Walla Walla Valley viticultural area is located within Walla Walla County in Washington State and Umatilla County in Oregon. It is entirely within the Columbia Valley viticultural area. The boundaries are as follows: ( 1 ) The beginning point is on the Walla Walla quadrangle map, in T8N/37E, at the point where the 2,000 foot contour line intersects with an unnamed light duty road approximately 250 feet east of U.S. Highway 12 in Minnick, Washington (on maps measured in metric units, this elevation is between the 600 and 650 meter contour lines),
( 2 ) Then the boundary goes northwest in a straight line for 7 kilometers (km), until it intersects with a power line that runs between T8N and T9N,
( 3 ) Then the boundary follows the power line west for 8 km, where it diverges from the power line and goes west-southwest in a straight line for approximately 33 km to the intersection of 2 unnamed light duty roads in the area marked Ninemile Canyon in the southwest corner of T8N/R33E,
( 4 ) Then the boundary goes south-southwest in a straight line approximately 8 km, until it reaches U.S. Highway 12, about 2.5 km east of Reese, Washington,
( 5 ) Then the boundary goes south in a straight line for approximately 8 km, crossing the Washington-Oregon state line and moving onto the Pendleton U.S.G.S. map, where it meets the 450 m contour line in T6N/R32E, near an unnamed peak with an elevation of 461 m,
( 6 ) Then the boundary follows the 450 m contour line in a generally southeasterly direction until it intersects Dry Creek in T4N/R35E,
( 7 ) Then the boundary goes southeast along Dry Creek (Oregon) until it reaches the 2000 foot contour line,
( 8 ) Then the boundary follows the 2000 foot contour line in a generally northeasterly direction, crossing the Oregon-Washington state line and returning to the Walla Walla U.S.G.S map, until it reaches the point of beginning.
[T.D. ATF-441, 66 FR 11542, Feb. 26, 2001]
Exhibit 10.8.1

 

FIRST AMENDMENT TO

 

TELADOC, INC.

 

SECOND AMENDED AND RESTATED STOCK INCENTIVE PLAN

 

THIS FIRST AMENDMENT (this “Amendment”) is made as of December 11, 2013 (“Effective Date”), to the TELADOC, INC. SECOND AMENDED AND RESTATED STOCK INCENTIVE PLAN (as amended, the “Plan”).

 

1.                                      All capitalized terms used herein without definition shall have the respective meanings ascribed thereto in the Plan.

 

2.                                      On and after the Effective Date, the Plan shall be amended as hereinafter set forth:

 

Section 1.3 of the Plan shall be amended and restated in its entirety to read as follows:  “1.3  Duration of the Plan.  This Plan shall commence on the Effective Date, and shall remain in effect, subject to the right of the Board to amend or terminate this Plan at any time pursuant to Article 9, until December 16, 2023.”

 

3.                                      Except as expressly modified by this Amendment, all of the terms and conditions of the Plan shall continue unchanged and in full force and effect.

 

[Signature Page Follows]

 











 

AS APPROVED BY THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF TELADOC, INC. ON December 11, 2013.

 

TELADOC, INC.

 

 

	
By:
    	
/s/   Jason Gorevic
    	
 
    
	
Name:
    	
Jason   Gorevic
    	
 
    
	
Title:
    	
Chief   Executive Officer
#### Santos Edy SOTO, Petitioner, v. Alberto R. GONZALES, Attorney General, Respondent.

No. 04-74562.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted Feb. 13, 2006.*

Decided Feb. 21, 2006.

Elsa I. Martinez, Esq., Martinez Golds-by *&*Associates, Los Angeles, CA, for Petitioner.

CAC-District Counsel, Esq., Office of the District Counsel, Department of Homeland Security, Los Angeles, CA, Ronald E. LeFevre, Chief Counsel, Office of The District Counsel, Department of Homeland Security, San Francisco, CA, Mary Jane Candaux, Esq., Jennifer L. Lightbody, Esq., DOJ — U.S. Department of Justice Civil Div./Office of Immigration Lit., Washington, DC, for Respondent.

*198Before: FERNANDEZ, RYMER, and BYBEE, Circuit Judges.

*

 This panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. *See*Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

MEMORANDUM **

Santos Edy Soto, a native and citizen of Mexico, petitions for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ summary affirmance of an immigration judge’s denial of his application for cancellation of removal for failure to establish ten years of continuous physical presence in the United States, as required by 8 U.S.C. § 1229b(b)(l)(A). We have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252, and we deny the petition for review.

Soto contends that the immigration judge erred in finding that he voluntarily departed in 1995, rather than 1992. This finding was supported by substantial evidence because Soto twice testified that he voluntarily departed following his arrest in 1995. *See Lopez-Alvarado v. Ashcroft,*381 F.3d 847, 850-51 (9th Cir.2004).

Soto also contends that his voluntary departure should not have interrupted his continuous physical presence. This contention is foreclosed by *Vasquez-Lopez v. Ashcroft,*343 F.3d 961 (9th Cir.2003) (per curiam). *Cf. Tapia v. Gonzales,*430 F.3d 997, 1000 (9th Cir.2005) (distinguishing administrative voluntary departure from being turned away at border).

PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED

**

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
```

[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 72 (Thursday, April 14, 2011)]
[Notices]
[Page 21107]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2011-9087]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS

Veterans' Rural Health Advisory Committee; Notice of Meeting

    The Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) gives notice under Public 
Law 92-463 (Federal Advisory Committee Act) that the Veterans' Rural 
Health Advisory Committee will conduct a teleconference meeting on 
Thursday, April 21, 2011, from 2 p.m. to 4 p.m., in Room GL20, 1722 I 
Street, NW., Washington, DC. The toll-free number for the meeting is 1-
800-767-1750, and the access code is 57165. The meeting is 
open to the public.
    The purpose of the Committee is to advise the Secretary of Veterans 
Affairs on health care issues affecting enrolled Veterans residing in 
rural areas. The Committee examines programs and policies that impact 
the provision of VA health care to enrolled Veterans residing in rural 
areas and discusses ways to improve and enhance VA services for these 
Veterans.
    The Committee will discuss the Committee's Annual Report to the VA 
Secretary, VA Veteran Centers services, rural women Veteran health 
care, and the meeting agenda and planning for the Committee's upcoming 
June 2011 meeting in Helena, Montana.
    A 15-minute period will be reserved at 3:40 p.m. for public 
comments. Individuals who wish to address the Committee are invited to 
submit a 1-2 page summary of their comments for inclusion in the 
official meeting record. Members of the public may also submit written 
statements for the Committee's review to Christina White, Designated 
Federal Officer, Department of Veterans Affairs (10A5A), 810 Vermont 
Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 20420 or e-mail at 
[email protected]. Any member of the public wishing to attend 
or seeking additional information should contact Ms. White at (202) 
461-7100.

    Dated: April 11, 2011.

    By direction of the Secretary.
William F. Russo,
Director of Regulations Management, Office of General Counsel.
[FR Doc. 2011-9087 Filed 4-13-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE P
```
§ 216.81 Who is eligible for a parent's annuity. ( a ) Where the employee is not survived by a widow(er), or child who is or ever could be entitled to an annuity as described by subpart G or H of this part, a parent of the deceased employee is eligible for both the tier I and tier II components of an annuity if he or she: ( 1 ) Is age 60 or older;
( 2 ) Has not married since the employee died;
( 3 ) Received one-half of his or her support (as defined in part 222 of this chapter) from the employee at the time the employee died; and
( 4 ) Files proof of support as provided for in paragraphs (b)(4) and (b)(5) of this section.
( b ) Where the employee is survived by a widow(er), or child who is or ever could be entitled to an annuity as described by subpart G or H of this part, a parent of the deceased employee is eligible for an annuity consisting of the tier I component alone if he or she: ( 1 ) Is age 60 or older;
( 2 ) Has not married since the employee died;
( 3 ) Is not in receipt of an old age benefit under the Social Security Act equal to or exceeding the amount of the parent's tier I annuity amount before it is reduced for the family maximum but after the sole survivor minimum is considered;
( 4 ) Received at least one-half of his or her support (as defined in part 222 of this chapter) from the employee either: ( i ) When the employee died, or
( ii ) At the beginning of the period of disability if the employee has a period of disability (as explained in part 220 of this chapter) which did not end before death; and
( 5 ) Files proof of support with the Board within 2 years after either: ( i ) The month in which the employee filed an application for a period of disability if support is to be established as of the beginning of the period of disability; or
( ii ) The date of the employee's death if support is to be established at that point.
( c ) The Board may accept proof of support filed after the 2-year period for reasons which constitute good cause to do so as that term is defined in part 219 of this chapter.
#### § 345.402 Strikes or work stoppages.

If benefits are payable to an employee for days of unemployment resulting from a strike or work stoppage growing out of a labor dispute, the Board will charge the benefit payment to the system unallocated charge balance, not to the cumulative benefit balance of the employee's base year employer. For the purposes of this section, the phrase “strike or work stoppage growing out of a labor dispute” does not include an employee's protected refusal to work under section 212(b) of the Federal Railroad Safety Act of 1970 (45 U.S.C. 441(b)).
#### § 225.58 Waiver of recomputation.

If the employee or the employee's family are disadvantaged in any way by a recomputation of a PIA to consider additional earnings, a request can be made to waive or give up the right to the recomputation. Such a request must be in writing and be made by every entitled family member. A request for waiver of a recomputation applies only to that recomputation for which the request is made.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY HIGH

 196

 304

 636

 1,667

 2,651

 1,718

 738

 420

 343

 275

 199

 694

 1,202

 1,257

 1,265

 4,756

 2,437

 1,306

 1,960

 523

 271

 191

 168

 163

 167

 180

 185

 762

 3,334

 4,485

 3,189

 159

 157

 156

 157

 157

 159

 159

 157

 157

 156

 158

 153

 154

 152

 156

 180

 166

 159

 152

 149

 150

 151

 148

 146

 145

 144

 145

 147

 149

 151

 151

 168

 178

 219

 317

 454

 363

 260

 217

 211

 198

 179

 193

 295

 317

 362

 1,204

 561

 368

 415

 231

 185

 165

 158

 154

 153

 154

 152

 227

 554

 765

 624

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

MAY 2019 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: June 3, 2019

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

PORT CHICAGO BOTTOM IN SUISUN BAY
### §§3331 to 3335. Repealed. Pub. L. 116–113, title VI, §601, Jan. 29, 2020, 134 Stat. 78

Section 3331, Pub. L. 103–182, title II, §201, Dec. 8, 1993, 107 Stat. 2068; Pub. L. 104–188, title I, §1954(a)(5), Aug. 20, 1996, 110 Stat. 1927, provided for various tariff modifications.

Section 3332, Pub. L. 103–182, title II, §202, Dec. 8, 1993, 107 Stat. 2069; Pub. L. 104–295, §21(a)(2), Oct. 11, 1996, 110 Stat. 3529; Pub. L. 105–206, title V, §5003(b)(4), July 22, 1998, 112 Stat. 790, related to rules of origin for goods.

Section 3333, Pub. L. 103–182, title II, §203, Dec. 8, 1993, 107 Stat. 2086; Pub. L. 116–113, title V, §501(b)(1), (2), (d)(1)–(3), Jan. 29, 2020, 134 Stat. 67, 68, consisted of subsecs. (a) to (e) relating to drawback. Subsecs. (b) and (c) had amended sections 81c, 1311 to 1313, and 1562 of this title. Subsecs. (a), (d), and (e) were transferred to section 4534 of this title by Pub. L. 116–113 prior to repeal of section 3333.

Section 3334, Pub. L. 103–182, title II, §210, Dec. 8, 1993, 107 Stat. 2099, prohibited drawback for television picture tubes.

Section 3335, Pub. L. 103–182, title II, §211, Dec. 8, 1993, 107 Stat. 2099, related to monitoring of television and picture tube imports and reports on results.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date of Repeal

Repeal effective on the date on which the USMCA entered into force (July 1, 2020), see section 601 of Pub. L. 116–113, set out as a note under former section 3301 of this title.

#### Effective Date

Pub. L. 103–182, title II, §213, Dec. 8, 1993, 107 Stat. 2099, which set out various effective dates for provisions in title II of Pub. L. 103–182, was repealed by Pub. L. 116–113, title VI, §601, Jan. 29, 2020, 134 Stat. 78, effective on the date the USMCA entered into force (July 1, 2020).
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY ELEV

 124.66

 124.47

 124.52

 123.89

 123.13

 122.90

 122.78

 122.34

 123.33

 122.46

 121.89

 121.92

 121.84

 122.07

 122.79

 123.55

 123.65

 124.00

 124.20

 123.73

 124.56

 124.04

 124.27

 124.01

 123.81

 123.72

 123.30

 123.35

 123.41

 123.53

 123.30

 8,591

 8,496

 8,521

 8,209

 7,852

 7,746

 7,692

 7,494

 7,946

 7,548

 7,295

 7,307

 7,274

 7,373

 7,697

 8,050

 8,097

 8,261

 8,361

 8,134

 8,541

 8,281

 8,396

 8,266

 8,172

 8,129

 7,932

 7,956

 7,984

 8,040

 7,932

STORAGE

+490

-95

+25

-312

-357

-106

-54

-198

+452

-398

-253

+12

-33

+99

+324

+353

+47

+164

+100

-227

+407

-260

+115

-130

-94

-43

-197

+24

+28

+56

-108

CHANGE

6,294

6,062

6,086

5,894

5,815

5,974

6,030

5,713

5,588

4,520

4,075

3,704

3,186

2,755

2,728

2,751

2,705

2,597

2,615

2,369

2,684

2,346

2,537

2,424

2,481

2,480

2,392

2,547

2,510

2,539

2,497

INFLOW

 4,922

 4,366

 4,920

 4,901

 4,870

 4,913

 4,945

 4,913

 4,960

 4,623

 4,102

 3,593

 3,096

 2,598

 2,463

 2,471

 2,580

 2,413

 2,463

 2,380

 2,376

 2,374

 2,376

 2,387

 2,425

 2,399

 2,387

 2,432

 2,392

 2,408

 2,448

POWER

 1,028

 1,644

 1,050

 1,048

 1,022

 1,012

 1,012

 804

 303

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

SPILL

 60

 60

 60

 60

 60

 60

 60

 60

 60

 60

 60

 60

 60

 60

 60

 60

 60

 60

 60

 60

 60

 60

 60

 60

 60

 60

 60

 60

 60

 60

 60

HATCHERY

 2

 3

 3

 2

 3

 2

 1

 1

 2

 2

 1

 2

 2

 2

 0

 2

 1

 1

 2

 3

 3

 3

 3

 3

 3

 3

 4

 3

 4

 3

 3

C.F.S.

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

MAY 2000 LAKE NATOMA DAILY OPERATIONS RUN DATE: June 15, 2000

IN LAKE

EVAP

C.F.S.

COMPUTED*

ACRE-FEET

RELEASE - C.F.S.

TOTALS -169 114,898 102,896 8,923 1,860 72

ACRE-FEET -169 227,900 204,094 17,699 3,689 143

COMMENTS:

* COMPUTED INFLOW IS THE SUM OF CHANGE IN STORAGE, RELEASES AND EVAPORATION.

SUMMARY

RELEASES (ACRE-FEET)

POWER 204,094

SPILL 17,699

FOLSOM SOUTH CANAL

HATCHERY

 2,444

 3,689

 8,101

FOLSOM

SOUTH 

CANAL

 35

 37

 40

 40

 40

 40

 39

 35

 35

 36

 40

 43

 45

 45

 42

 40

 40

 40

 40

 40

 40

 40

 40

 40

 40

 40

 40

 40

 40

 40

 40

 1,232

 2,444

(1)

(1) INCHES OF EVAPORATION TAKEN FROM FOLSOM PAN.

RELEASES (ACRE-FEET)

TOTAL 227,926

Table 12
### §468. Cost of inspection; overtime

The cost of inspection rendered under the requirements of this chapter, shall be borne by the United States, except the cost of overtime and holiday pay paid pursuant to the 1 section 2219a of title 7.

(Pub. L. 85–172, §25, formerly §19, Aug. 28, 1957, 71 Stat. 448, renumbered Pub. L. 90–492, §17, Aug. 18, 1968, 82 Stat. 805; Pub. L. 107–171, title X, §10703(c)(1), May 13, 2002, 116 Stat. 517.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

Section 2219a of title 7, referred to in text, was in the original "section 10703 of the Farm Security and Rural Investment Act of 2002", meaning section 10703 of Pub. L. 107–171, which enacted section 2219a of Title 7, Agriculture, amended this section, section 695 of this title, and section 5549 of Title 5, Government Organization and Employees, and repealed section 394 of Title 7.

#### Amendments

2002—Pub. L. 107–171 substituted "except the cost of overtime and holiday pay paid pursuant to the section 2219a of title 7." for "except that the cost of overtime and holiday work performed in establishments subject to the provisions of this chapter at such rates as the Secretary may determine shall be borne by such establishments. Sums received by the Secretary in reimbursement for sums paid out by him for such premium pay work shall be available without fiscal year limitation to carry out the purposes of this section."

1 So in original. The word "the" probably should not appear.
§ 220.19 Payment of the disability annuity during the trial work period and the reentitlement period. ( a ) The employee who is entitled to an occupational disability annuity will not be paid an annuity for each month in the trial work period or reentitlement period in which he or she— ( 1 ) Works for an employer covered by the Railroad Retirement Act (see § 220.160); or
( 2 ) Earns more than $400 (after deduction of impairment-related work expenses) in employment or self-employment (see §§ 220.161 and 220.164). See § 220.145 for the definition of impairment-related work expenses.
( b ) If the employee's occupational disability annuity is stopped because of work during the trial work period or reentitlement period, and the employee discontinues that work before the end of either period, the disability annuity may be started again without a new application and a new determination of disability.
#### §§ 365.112-365.129 [Reserved]
I 

114TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 3693 

To require a report on whether Iran’s Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps 

is a terrorist entity, and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

OCTOBER 6, 2015 

Mr. POE of Texas introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Foreign Affairs 

A BILL 

To require a report on whether Iran’s Islamic Revolutionary 

Guard Corps is a terrorist entity, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘IRGC Terrorist Sanc5 tions Act of 2015’’. 

6 SEC. 2. REPORT TO CONGRESS ON TREATMENT OF ISLAMIC 

7 REVOLUTIONARY GUARD CORPS. 

8 (a) REPORT.—The Secretary of the Treasury shall, 

9 not later than 30 days after the date of the enactment 


smartinez on DSK4TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 3693 IH

1 of this Act, submit to the committees referred to in sub2 section (b) a report on the following: 

3 (1) Whether Iran’s Islamic Revolutionary 

4 Guard Corps meets the requirements for designation 

5 as a terrorist entity under section 1(b) of Executive 

6 Order 13224 of September 24, 2001. 

7 (2)(A) Whether an entity the board of directors 

8 of which is controlled by members of Iran’s Islamic 

9 Revolutionary Guard Corps or by representatives of 

10 entities controlled by members of the Islamic Revo11 lutionary Guard Corps is considered to be an entity 

12 controlled by the Government of Iran for purposes 

13 of section 560.313 of title 31, Code of Federal Reg14 ulations. 

15 (B) What factors are used to determine control 

16 and a controlling interest for purposes of such sec17 tion 560.313. 

18 (b) COMMITTEES.—The committees to which the re19 port under subsection (a) shall be submitted are the fol20 lowing: 

21 (1) The Committee on Armed Services, the 

22 Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Af23 fairs, the Committee on Foreign Relations, the Com24 mittee on the Judiciary, the Committee on HomeVerDate Sep 11 2014 01:44 Oct 09, 2015 Jkt 059200 PO 00000 Frm 00002 Fmt 6652 Sfmt 6201 E:\BILLS\H3693.IH H3693

smartinez on DSK4TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
3 

•HR 3693 IH

1 land Security and Governmental Affairs, and the Se2 lect Committee on Intelligence of the Senate. 

3 (2) The Committee on Armed Services, the 

4 Committee on Financial Services, the Committee on 

5 Foreign Affairs, the Committee on the Judiciary, the 

6 Committee on Homeland Security, and the Perma7 nent Select Committee on Intelligence of the House 

8 of Representatives. 

Æ 


smartinez on DSK4TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
# B&W Limestone Forced

- oxidation (LSFO) FGD

# Infilco Degremont FGD WWT Process

FGD blowdown

Equalization tank Coagulation tank Lime slurry

Forward feed To ash pond

M M M M



### DensaDeg

clarifier

Effluent tank

Filter press FeCl 3 

### TMT

Sludge holding tank M 

### Flocculating polymer

Filter press cake Filtrate to building

sump Sludge recycle

Filter press feed pumpReactor Turbine Drive Turbine Draft Tube FeCl3

Sludge Recirculation Sludge Blowdown Settling Tube Assembly Launder Assembly Clarifier Rake Drive

Settling Tube Support

Sludge Recycle Pump Forward feed 

## Coagulation tank Reactor Clarifier / Thickener 

# DensaDeg ® Clarifier by Degremont Technologies TMT

Polymer

# Infilco Degremont influent design basis

Parameter Design Range Influent flow (gpm) 200 TSS (mg/l) 0

– 25,000 TDS (mg/L) 0

– 35,000

Parameter Range Parameter Range

Ortho

- PO 4 (mg/l) 0

–20 Fe (mg/l) 0

–450 Mg (mg/l) 0

–1,500 Pb (mg/l) 0

–3 .3 Na (mg/l) 0

–350 Li (mg/l) N/A

F (mg/l) N/A Mn (mg/l) N/A Cl (mg/l) 0

–20,000 Hg (mg/l) 0

–0.023 SiO 2 (mg/l) 0

–250 Mo (mg/l) N/A Al (mg/l) 0

–500 Ni (mg/l) 0

–14.5 Sb (mg/l) 0

–0.8 K (mg/l) 0

- 200 As (mg/l) 0

–1.3 Se (mg/l) 0

–0.4 Ba (mg/l) 0

–0.15 Ag (mg/l) 0

–0.1 Be (mg/l) 0

–0.3 Sr (mg/l) 0

–4

B (mg/l) 0

–30 Tl (mg/l) 0

–0.3 Cd (mg/l) 0

–0.13 Sn (mg/l) N/A Cr (mg/l) 0

–2.7 Ti (mg/l) 0

–37 Co (mg/l) N/A Zn (mg /l) 0

–17.8 Cu (mg/l) 0

–6.6