alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 218.42 When a parent annuity ends. ( a ) *Tier I.* The tier I benefit of a parent annuity ends with the earliest of the last day of the month before the month in which the parent— ( 1 ) Dies;
( 2 ) Becomes entitled to an old age benefit under the Social Security Act that is equal to or larger than the tier I benefit of the parent annuity before any reduction for the family maximum, unless he or she is also entitled to a tier II benefit (reduction for the family maximum is discussed in part 228 of this chapter);
( 3 ) Becomes entitled to another survivor annuity in a larger amount, unless he or she elects to be paid the smaller annuity; or
( 4 ) Remarries after the employee's death, unless he or she marries a person who is entitled to Social Security or Railroad Retirement Act benefits as a divorced spouse, widow, widower, mother, father, parent, or disabled child.
( b ) *Tier II.* The tier II benefit of a parent annuity ends with the earliest of the last day of the month before the month in which the parent— ( 1 ) Dies;
( 2 ) Remarries after the employee's death; or
( 3 ) Becomes entitled to another survivor annuity in a larger amount, unless he or she elects to be paid the smaller annuity.
§ 220.121 Responsibility for assessing and determining residual functional capacity. ( a ) For cases at the initial or reconsideration level, the responsibility for determining residual functional capacity rests with the bureau of retirement claims. This assessment is based on all the evidence the Board has, including any statements regarding what the claimant can still do that have been provided by treating or examining physicians, consultative physicians, or any other physician designated by the Board. In any case where there is evidence which indicates the existence of a mental impairment, the bureau of retirement claims will not make a residual functional capacity determination without making every reasonable effort to ensure that a qualified psychiatrist or psychologist has provided a medical review of the case.
( b ) For cases at the hearing level or the three-member-Board review level, the responsibility for deciding residual functional capacity rests with the hearings officer or the three-member Board, respectively.
#### § 771.62 Initial application.

In the case of an initial application, if the applicant does not request a hearing within 15 days, or within such additional time as the Director of Industry Operations may in his discretion allow, the Director of Industry Operations will return a copy of the application, marked “Disapproved,” to the applicant, accompanied by a brief statement including the findings upon which the denial is based.
Electrical Conductivity, UMHOS

Day High Low Mean

1 0 0 0

2 0 0 0

3 0 0 0

4 0 0 0

5 0 0 0

6 0 0 0

7 0 0 0

8 0 0 0

9 0 0 0

10 0 0 0

11 0 0 0

12 0 0 0

13 0 0 0

14 0 0 0

15 0 0 0

16 0 0 0

17 0 0 0

18 0 0 0

19 0 0 0

20 0 0 0

21 0 0 0

22 0 0 0

23 0 0 0

24 0 0 0

25 0 0 0

26 0 0 0

27 0 0 0

28 0 0 0

29 0 0 0

30 0 0 0

COMMENT(S):

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

Historical Archive and Report Database

Pittsburg TopOn The Sacramento River

Period: April 2023 Run Date: 6/5/2023
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

DAY ELEV

 1,050.12

 1,050.11

 1,050.06

 1,050.03

 1,049.99

 1,049.97

 1,049.95

 1,049.99

 1,050.05

 1,050.26

 1,050.78

 1,051.06

 1,051.20

 1,051.23

 1,051.30

 1,051.31

 1,051.23

 1,051.26

 1,051.29

 1,051.33

 1,051.34

 1,051.45

 1,051.48

 1,051.47

 1,051.71

 1,052.01

 1,052.29

 1,052.37

 1,976.3

 1,976.2

 1,975.7

 1,975.3

 1,974.9

 1,974.7

 1,974.4

 1,974.9

 1,975.5

 1,977.9

 1,983.6

 1,986.7

 1,988.2

 1,988.5

 1,989.3

 1,989.4

 1,988.5

 1,988.9

 1,989.2

 1,989.6

 1,989.7

 1,991.0

 1,991.3

 1,991.2

 1,993.8

 1,997.1

 2,000.2

 2,001.1

STORAGE

-0.6

-0.1

-0.6

-0.3

-0.4

-0.2

-0.2

+0.4

+0.7

+2.3

+5.7

+3.1

+1.5

+0.3

+0.8

+0.1

-0.9

+0.3

+0.3

+0.4

+0.1

+1.2

+0.3

-0.1

+2.6

+3.3

+3.1

+0.9

CHANGE

697

646

460

532

616

554

498

733

1,112

2,230

3,628

1,643

1,079

916

856

968

819

745

717

823

636

1,546

1,003

750

2,077

2,919

2,299

1,484

INFLOW

 903

 697

 726

 680

 806

 639

 608

 505

 761

 933

 691

 85

 16

 11

 11

 877

 1,260

 532

 543

 557

 563

 927

 832

 744

 695

 1,250

 729

 1,026

POWER

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

SPILL

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 280

 702

 426

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

OUTLET

 71

 4

 11

 18

 32

 25

 0

 7

 18

 132

 53

 4

 4

 36

 29

 36

 4

 46

 7

 43

 18

 7

 4

 61

 46

 0

 7

 11

C.F.S.

 .20

 .01

 .03

 .05

 .09

 .07

 .00

 .02

 .05

 .37

 .15

 .01

 .01

 .10

 .08

 .10

 .01

 .13

 .02

 .12

 .05

 .02

 .01

 .17

 .13

 .00

 .02

 .03

INCHES

 .00

 .00

 .02

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .10

 .62

 .97

 .89

 .25

 .03

 .00

 .00

 .01

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .01

 1.44

 .09

 .50

 .52

 1.00

 .73

PRECIP

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

FEBRUARY 2007 NEW MELONES LAKE DAILY OPERATIONS RUN DATE: May 16, 2007

IN LAKE

EVAPORATION

INCHES

C.F.S.

COMPUTED*

1000 ACRE-FEET

RELEASE - C.F.S.

TOTALS +24.0 32,986 18,607 0 1,408 734 2.05 7.18

ACRE-FEET +24,000 65,428 36,907 0 2,793 1,456

COMMENTS:

SUMMARY

RELEASE (ACRE-FEET)

POWER 36,907

SPILL 0

OUTLET

TOTAL

 2,793

 39,700

PRECIPITATION

THIS MONTH =

TO DATE =

 7.18

JULY 1, 2006 15.50

 1,976.9

Table 13
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
 Washington, D.C. 20549
 
 Post-Effective Amendment No. 1
To
 FORM S-8
 REGISTRATION STATEMENT
Under
THE SECURITIES ACT OF 1933
 
 K-SEA TRANSPORTATION PARTNERS L.P.
  
 Delaware
(State or other jurisdiction of 
incorporation or organization)
    
    20-0194477
(I.R.S. Employer
Identification No.)One Tower Center Boulevard, 
17th Floor 
East Brunswick, New Jersey
(Address of principal executive offices)
    
    08816
(Zip Code)
 
 K-SEA TRANSPORTATION PARTNERS L.P. LONG-TERM INCENTIVE PLAN
K-SEA TRANSPORTATION PARTNERS L.P. EMPLOYEE UNIT PURCHASE PLAN
 
 Timothy J. Casey 

K-Sea Transportation Partners L.P.


One Tower Center Boulevard, 17th Floor

East Brunswick, New Jersey 08816
 (732) 565-3818
 
  Large accelerated filer o
    
    Accelerated filer þ
    
    Non-accelerated filer o
(Do not check if a smaller reporting company)
    
    Smaller reporting company o




---



##### 



DEREGISTRATION OF SECURITIES
    II-1




---



##### 



SIGNATURES
  K-SEA TRANSPORTATION PARTNERS L.P.By:
    KSP Holding Sub, LLC,its General PartnerJuly 15, 2011
    By:
    /s/ David W. GrzebinskiDavid W. GrzebinskiManager  Signature
    
    Title
    
    Date/s/ Joseph H. Pyne

Joseph H. Pyne
    
    Manager of KSP Holding Sub, LLC, the General
Partner of K-Sea Transportation Partners, L.P.
    
    July 15, 2011/s/ David W. Grzebinski

David W. Grzebinski
    
    Manager of KSP Holding Sub, LLC, the General
Partner of K-Sea Transportation Partners, L.P.
    
    July 15, 2011/s/ Amy D. Husted

Amy D. Husted
    
    Manager of KSP Holding Sub, LLC, the General
Partner of K-Sea Transportation Partners, L.P.
    
    July 15, 2011
§ 1002.163 What types of health plans are covered by USERRA? ( a ) USERRA defines a health plan to include an insurance policy or contract, medical or hospital service agreement, membership or subscription contract, or arrangement under which the employee's health services are provided or the expenses of those services are paid.
( b ) USERRA covers group health plans as defined in the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 (ERISA) at 29 U.S.C. 1191b(a). USERRA applies to group health plans that are subject to ERISA, and plans that are not subject to ERISA, such as those sponsored by State or local governments or religious organizations for their employees.
( c ) USERRA covers multiemployer plans maintained pursuant to one or more collective bargaining agreements between employers and employee organizations. USERRA applies to multiemployer plans as they are defined in ERISA at 29 U.S.C. 1002(37). USERRA contains provisions that apply specifically to multiemployer plans in certain situations.
§ 5.146 Blended applejack. ( a ) *The class blended applejack.* “Blended applejack” is a mixture containing at least 20 percent on a proof gallon basis of apple brandy (applejack) that has been stored in oak barrels for not less than 2 years, and not more than 80 percent of neutral spirits on a proof gallon basis. Blended applejack must be bottled at not less than 40 percent alcohol by volume (80° proof).
( b ) *Label designation.* The label designation for blended applejack may be “blended applejack” or “applejack-a blend.”
#### § 25.203 How is the Special Schedule applied to non-resident aliens in the Territory of Guam?

The special schedule of compensation established by subpart B of this part shall apply to an injury or death occurring on or after August 29, 2011 in the Territory of Guam to non-resident alien employees recruited in foreign countries for employment by the military departments in the Territory of Guam. This schedule shall not apply to any employee who becomes a bona fide permanent resident as such claims will be decided in accordance with § 25.5.
§ 323.1 Introduction. ( a ) This part defines the phrase *nongovernmental plan for unemployment or sickness insurance* and sets forth the procedure by which an employer may obtain a determination by the Railroad Retirement Board as to whether a particular plan that such employer maintains for its employees qualifies as a nongovernmental plan. In general, any payment by an employer to an employee for services rendered as an employee will be considered to be *remuneration* within the meaning of section 1(j) of the Railroad Unemployment Insurance Act and part 322 of this chapter. This includes employer payments that relate to an employee's loss of earnings during a period of time when the employee is unemployed or sick, including sickness resulting from injury. The exception is when an employer pays an employee a benefit pursuant to the provisions of a nongovernmental plan for unemployment or sickness insurance established by an employer for the benefit of its employees. Benefit payments under such plans are not remuneration and do not affect an employee's eligibility for unemployment or sickness benefits under the Railroad Unemployment Insurance Act.
( b ) This part does not have any general applicability to private insurance contracts under which an insurance company, pursuant to a policy of insurance maintained by or for an employee, pays medical or hospital expenses or other cash benefits to or in behalf of an employee. Nor does this part apply to any private plan for relief of unemployment established by a party other than an employer such as, for example, a plan established by a labor union under which it undertakes to pay benefits to striking members of the union out of a strike insurance fund. Insurance policy benefits and strike unemployment benefits, although paid under plans that are nongovernmental in nature, are not considered remuneration for services under the general definition of *remuneration.* See part 322 of this chapter.
### §379dd–1. Location of Foundation

The Foundation shall, if practicable, be located not more than 20 miles from the District of Columbia.

(June 25, 1938, ch. 675, §771, as added Pub. L. 110–85, title VI, §601(b), Sept. 27, 2007, 121 Stat. 897.)
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY

 35,817

 35,647

 35,314

 34,891

 34,483

 34,138

 33,845

 33,523

 33,574

 33,403

 33,417

 33,386

 32,925

 32,462

 32,085

 32,119

 32,095

 32,106

 32,038

 31,930

 31,805

 31,454

 31,441

 31,340

 30,716

 30,115

 29,417

 29,763

 27,993

 27,739

 27,167

 53,402

 52,712

 52,121

 51,595

 51,109

 50,541

 49,925

 49,335

 48,382

 47,665

 46,718

 45,853

 45,240

 44,988

 44,498

 43,563

 42,877

 42,247

 41,727

 41,339

 40,691

 40,239

 39,519

 38,948

 38,887

 38,969

 39,015

 38,933

 38,953

 38,503

 38,323

STORAGE - A.F. 

 89,219

 88,359

 87,435

 86,486

 85,592

 84,679

 83,770

 82,858

 81,956

 81,068

 80,135

 79,239

 78,165

 77,450

 76,583

 75,682

 74,972

 74,353

 73,765

 73,269

 72,496

 71,693

 70,960

 70,288

 69,603

 69,084

 68,432

 68,696

 66,946

 66,242

 65,490

739

646

791

888

923

888

756

877

633

625

827

793

712

659

719

722

923

732

1,005

1,049

860

860

859

779

833

1,486

938

802

826

631

758

274

212

325

410

472

428

298

417

178

177

357

341

171

299

282

268

565

420

709

799

470

455

489

440

488

1,224

609

935

-56

276

379

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

OCTOBER 2004 FULL NATURAL FLOW AT NEW MELONES DAM RUN DATE: 11/16/2004

TOTALS -24,652 13,111

* October 1, 26,006

 0.5

 1.0

 1.6

 2.4

 3.4

 4.2

 4.8

 5.6

 6.0

 6.3

 7.0

 7.7

 8.1

 8.6

 9.2

 9.7

 10.9

 11.7

 13.1

 14.7

 15.6

 16.5

 17.5

 18.4

 19.3

 21.8

 23.0

 24.8

 24.7

 25.3

 26.0

DONNELLS

RES

BEARDSLEY

RES

2004 TO DATE

NEW

MELONES

INFLOW

C.F.S

NATURAL

RIVER

C.F.S

ACCUM *

FULL

NATURAL

1000 A.F.

RESERVOIR

TOTAL

-923

-860

-924

-949

-894

-913

-909

-912

-902

-888

-933

-896

-1,074

-715

-867

-901

-710

-619

-588

-496

-773

-803

-733

-672

-685

-519

-652

+264

-1,750

-704

-752

CHANGE

A.F. C.F.S.

-465

-434

-466

-478

-451

-460

-458

-460

-455

-448

-470

-452

-541

-360

-437

-454

-358

-312

-296

-250

-390

-405

-370

-339

-345

-262

-329

+133

-882

-355

-379
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY HIGH

 23,677

 23,169

 23,394

 23,484

 22,403

 21,950

 21,793

 20,245

 18,534

 20,151

 21,904

 24,539

 26,392

 26,571

 26,965

 26,807

 26,115

 25,682

 24,832

 22,937

 21,013

 19,106

 16,542

 16,943

 16,760

 16,827

 16,164

 16,605

 15,870

 14,820

 14,533

 6,107

 6,414

 6,390

 7,093

 7,805

 8,168

 8,176

 8,706

 8,614

 8,899

 9,355

 10,944

 10,381

 9,354

 9,344

 8,359

 9,468

 10,006

 9,703

 9,315

 9,578

 9,301

 8,972

 9,071

 8,156

 7,295

 7,027

 6,334

 6,663

 5,933

 6,761

 14,436

 14,461

 14,467

 14,729

 14,831

 14,776

 15,133

 14,396

 13,653

 13,370

 13,886

 16,082

 17,055

 17,130

 17,322

 17,483

 17,380

 17,340

 16,742

 15,779

 15,103

 14,385

 12,828

 12,139

 11,670

 11,593

 11,444

 11,269

 10,801

 10,106

 10,681

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

AUGUST 2005 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: September 12, 2005

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

PORT CHICAGO BOTTOM IN SUISUN BAY
§ 10.823 How will the administrative law judge conduct the hearing and issue the recommended decision? ( a ) To the extent appropriate, proceedings before the administrative law judge shall be governed by 29 CFR part 18.
( b ) The administrative law judge shall receive such relevant evidence as may be adduced at the hearing. Parties to the hearing are the provider and OWCP. Evidence shall be presented under oath, orally or in the form of written statements. The administrative law judge shall consider the Notice and Response, including all pertinent documents accompanying them, and may also consider any evidence which refers to the provider or to any claim with respect to which the provider has provided medical services, hospital services, or medical services and supplies, and such other evidence as the administrative law judge may determine to be necessary or useful in evaluating the matter.
( c ) All hearings shall be recorded and the original of the complete transcript shall become a permanent part of the official record of the proceedings.
( d ) Pursuant to 5 U.S.C. 8126 and 29 CFR part 18, the administrative law judge may issue subpoenas, administer oaths, and examine witnesses with respect to the proceedings.
( e ) At the conclusion of the hearing, the administrative law judge shall issue a recommended decision and cause it to be served on all parties to the proceeding, their representatives and the Director of OWCP.
# **Exhibit23.1**

 

 

 
|   | Crowe Chizek and Company LLC |
|--------|------------------------------|
|   | Member Horwath International |

** **

**REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLICACCOUNTING FIRM**

 

The Board of Directors

Tennessee Commerce Bancorp, Inc.

Franklin, Tennessee

 

We have audited the consolidated balance sheets of Tennessee CommerceBancorp, Inc. as of December 31, 2004 and 2003, and the related consolidatedstatements of income, changes in shareholders’ equity and cash flows for eachof the three years in the period ended December 31, 2004. These financialstatements are the responsibility of the Company’s management. Ourresponsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based onour audits.

 

We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the PublicCompany Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards requirethat we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whetherthe financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includesexamining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures inthe financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accountingprinciples used and significant estimates made by management, as well asevaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that ouraudits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.

 

In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements referred to abovepresent fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of TennesseeCommerce Bancorp, Inc. as of December 31, 2004 and 2003, and the results of itsoperations and its cash flows for each of the three years in the period endedDecember 31, 2004, in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accountingprinciples

 

 
|                 | /s/ Crowe Chizek and Company LLC |   |
|----------------------|----------------------------------|--------|
|                 | Crowe Chizek and Company LLC     |   |
|                 |
| Brentwood, Tennessee |
| March 31, 2005       |

 

----
### D ISTRICT 

### C OURT 

### O F 

### A PPEAL 

### O F 

### T HE 

### S TATE 

### O F 

### F LORIDA
F OURTH D ISTRICT

RAYMOND C. GLEASON , Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA , Appellee.

No. 4D 20

- 1613

[ November 5, 2020 ]

Appeal of order denying rule 3.8 5 0 motion from the Circuit Court for the Nineteenth Judicial Circuit, St. Lucie County ; Robert E. Belanger

, Judge; L.T. Case No. 56

- 2013

- CF

- 000865 A

.
Raymond C. Gleason

, Live Oak

, pro se.

No appearance required for appellee.

P ER C URIAM

.
Affirmed.

G ROSS , C IKLIN and C ONNER , JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
C OURT OF A PPEALS FOR THE
F IRST D ISTRICT OF T EXAS AT H OUSTON

O RDER

Appellate case name: $4,416.00 in United States Currency v. The State of Texas

Appellate case number: 01

- 13

- 0 0514

- C V

Trial court case number: 11

- CV

- 1941

Trial court: 122nd District Court of Galveston County

This case was abated and reman ded to the trial court on July 3 , 201 3 . In the order of abatement, we ordered the trial court to execute “a written, signed order granting the State’s non

suit

. ” On September 18 , 201 3 , the trial

- court clerk filed a supplemental clerk’s record, containing the trial court’s written, signed order granting the non

- suit.

Accordingly, we REINSTATE this case on the Court’s active docket.

Appellant is ORDERED to pay one

- half of the $175 filing f ee to this Court no later than 10 days from the date of this order and the other one

- half of the $175 filing fee to this Court no later than 30 days from the date of this order, or the Court may dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution

. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 5, 42.3.

It is so ORDERED.

Judge’s signature: /s/ Evelyn Keyes

 Acting individually  Acting for the Court

Date: September 24, 2013
EXHIBIT 32

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of MWI Veterinary Supply, Inc. (the "Company") for
the period ended September 30, 2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), we, James F. Cleary, Jr., President and Chief Executive
Officer, and Mary Patricia B. Thompson, Senior Vice President of Finance and Administration, Chief Financial Officer, respectively, of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to our knowledge:



November 20,
2009

/s/ JAMES F. CLEARY, JR. James F. Cleary, Jr. President and Chief Executive Officer/s/ MARY PATRICIA B. THOMPSON Mary Patricia B. Thompson Senior Vice President of Finance and
Administration, Chief Financial Officer


---



QuickLinks
1

Mears, Gilbert

From: Fred Welty <fdwelt@gmail.com>

Sent: Friday, August 29, 2014 8:07 AM

To: Mears, Gilbert

Subject: TRI, Docket #: EPA-HQ-TRI-2013-0281

Follow Up Flag: Flag for follow up

Flag Status: Flagged

Gilbert Mears 

Toxics Release Inventory Program Division, Environmental Protection Agency 

1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Washington, DC 20460 

mears.gilbert@epa.gov

Docket #: EPA-HQ-TRI-2013-0281 

Dear Mr. Mears, 

I am writing in regard to the loophole which the oil and gas industry has which enables it to avoid reporting the 

release of toxic chemicals under the Toxic Release Inventory. This is wrong policy. It endangers the 

public. Please revise EPA policy so as to bring the industry into compliance under TPI. 

I live in NE Ohio in an area which will soon experience fracking. I am personally endangered by the possible--

probably likely--release of toxic chemicals by the oil and gas drillers. I at least deserve to know which 

chemicals might be causing me harm. 

This pertains to Docket #: EPA-HQ-TRI-2013-0281 

Thank you. 

Sincerely, 

Fred Welty 

11630 Butternut Rd. 

Chardon, OH 44024