alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 99.7







CONSENT OF  R. RIVERA





I hereby consent to the use of my name in connection with the following documents and report, which are being filed as exhibits to and incorporated by reference into the registration statement on Form 40-F of Silver Wheaton Corp. (the Company) being filed with the United States Securities and Exchange Commission:



1.

Information regarding the resource and reserve estimates of the Los Filos Project;



2.

The technical report dated December 31, 2007, as amended, February 8, 2008, entitled Peñasquito Project Technical Report Concepcíon del Oro District, Zacatecas State, México (the Peñasquito Report); and



3.

The annual information form of the Company dated March 28, 2008, which includes reference to my name in connection with information relating to the Los Filos Project and the Peñasquito Report and the properties described therein.







Date: March 28, 2008

| |  |                                                                                                                                                             
| |  | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| |  | /s/ Reynaldo Rivera, AUSIMM
______________________________________
Name: Reynaldo Rivera, AUSIMM
Title: Vice President, Exploration at Luismin,
S.A. de C.V.
### SAT Report PMN Number: P-09-0142 SAT Date: 1/13/2009 Print Date: 3/21/2011

Related cases : CBI : Yes Health related cases: Ecotox related cases:

Concern levels : Type of Concern: Health Eco Comments Level of Concern: 1-2 1

Persistence Bioaccum Toxicity Comments U U1

Exposure Based Review : Health: N o Ecotox: N o Routes of exposure : Health: Inhalation and dermal Ecotox: N o releases to water Fate: ; Keywords : Keywords: LUNG, UNCERT-IMMUNO/ONCO-LUNG Summary of Assessment :
Fate : Fate Summary: P-09-0142-44 FATE: Solid S < 0.001 mg/L at 25 EC (ICB) VP < 1.0E-6 torr at 25 EC (E) BP > 400 EC (E) H < 1.00E-8 (E) POTW removal (%) = U via U Time for complete ultimate aerobic biodeg = U Sorption to soils/sediments = U PBT Potential: PUBU*CEB FATE: Migration to ground water = U

Health : Health Summary: For any particles with a particle size less than 100 nanometers, absorption is poor all routes based on analogs. For those particles with a particle size greater than 100 nanometers, absorption is nil all routes based on physical/chemical p roperties. N ote that the PMN submission states the particle size is 0.15 to 176 microns based on data for P09-0142. There is concern for lung overload if respirable particles are inhaled. For any particles that are less than 100 nanometers, there is also concern for lung cancer if inhaled and immunotoxicity. Low moderate concern for the material as described in the submission. Low moderate concern.

Ecotox :

Test Organism Test Type Test End Point Predicted Measured Comments

fish 96-h LC50 * daphnid 48-h LC50 * green algal 96-h EC50 * fish

_ chronic value * daphnid

_ chronic value * algal

_ chronic value * Sewage Sludge 3-h EC50

_ Sewage Sludge

_ Chronic Value

_ Ecotox Values Comments: Predictions are based on SARs for esters; SAR chemical class = ester; formula weight = 911/1031/1031; log Kow very high, i.e., >9 (EPI); p H7; effective concentrations based on 100% active ingredients and nominal concentrations; hardness <150.0 mg/L as CaCO3; and TOC <2.0 mg/L;

Factors Values Comments Assessment Factor 10 Concentration of Concern ( p pb) *

SARs SAR Class
Ecotox Factors Comments:
SAT Chair: Becky Jones
(No. 74-CC-382

#### Harold S. Marshall, Claimant, *vs.*State of Illinois, Respondent.

*Opinion filed March 25, 1974.*

Harold S. Marshall, Claimant, pro se.

William J. Scott, Attorney General; William E. Webber, Assistant Attorney General, for Respondent.

*309Per Curiam.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

DAY

 21,154

 20,930

 21,048

 21,169

 20,966

 20,788

 20,614

 20,405

 20,292

 20,310

 20,381

 20,223

 20,046

 19,907

 19,676

 19,438

 19,514

 19,596

 19,385

 19,129

 18,924

 19,414

 19,626

 20,173

 20,494

 20,396

 20,256

 20,072

 19,608

 19,117

 32,054

 32,011

 31,799

 31,529

 31,467

 31,510

 31,553

 31,611

 31,625

 31,553

 31,399

 31,360

 31,467

 31,534

 31,606

 31,683

 31,616

 31,341

 31,245

 31,250

 31,293

 31,336

 31,197

 31,067

 31,000

 30,944

 30,963

 31,034

 31,524

 31,697

STORAGE - A.F. 

 53,208

 52,941

 52,847

 52,698

 52,433

 52,298

 52,167

 52,016

 51,917

 51,863

 51,780

 51,583

 51,513

 51,441

 51,282

 51,121

 51,130

 50,937

 50,630

 50,379

 50,217

 50,750

 50,823

 51,240

 51,494

 51,340

 51,219

 51,106

 51,132

 50,814

409

423

393

318

353

181

320

321

434

131

477

1,014

368

249

221

498

203

157

496

415

333

642

519

1,053

680

388

480

295

758

470

275

288

346

243

219

113

254

245

384

104

435

915

333

213

141

417

208

60

341

288

251

911

556

1,263

808

310

419

238

771

310

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

NOVEMBER 2001 FULL NATURAL FLOW AT NEW MELONES DAM RUN DATE: 12/20/2001

TOTALS -2,660 11,659

* October 1, 23,126

 17.7

 18.3

 19.0

 19.5

 19.9

 20.1

 20.6

 21.1

 21.9

 22.1

 23.0

 24.8

 25.4

 25.9

 26.1

 27.0

 27.4

 27.5

 28.2

 28.7

 29.2

 31.0

 32.2

 34.7

 36.3

 36.9

 37.7

 38.2

 39.7

 40.3

DONNELLS

RES

BEARDSLEY

RES

2001 TO DATE

NEW

MELONES

INFLOW

C.F.S

NATURAL

RIVER

C.F.S

ACCUM *

FULL

NATURAL

1000 A.F.

RESERVOIR

TOTAL

-266

-267

-94

-149

-265

-135

-131

-151

-99

-54

-83

-197

-70

-72

-159

-161

+9

-193

-307

-251

-162

+533

+73

+417

+254

-154

-121

-113

+26

-318

CHANGE

A.F. C.F.S.

-134

-135

-47

-75

-134

-68

-66

-76

-50

-27

-42

-99

-35

-36

-80

-81

+5

-97

-155

-127

-82

+269

+37

+210

+128

-78

-61

-57

+13

-160
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY

 38,082

 38,206

 38,359

 38,654

 38,936

 39,154

 39,366

 39,505

 39,666

 39,814

 39,969

 40,120

 40,264

 40,401

 40,527

 40,642

 40,772

 40,906

 41,033

 41,011

 40,870

 40,895

 40,736

 43,470

 47,839

 48,642

 48,806

 49,093

 48,703

 48,772

 48,760

 58,832

 57,923

 56,989

 56,103

 55,169

 54,488

 53,866

 52,888

 51,945

 50,974

 49,998

 49,030

 48,056

 47,084

 46,119

 45,166

 44,204

 43,270

 42,321

 41,564

 40,843

 39,954

 39,344

 39,757

 40,343

 40,510

 40,795

 40,785

 41,370

 41,470

 41,612

STORAGE - A.F. 

 96,914

 96,129

 95,348

 94,757

 94,105

 93,642

 93,232

 92,393

 91,611

 90,788

 89,967

 89,150

 88,320

 87,485

 86,646

 85,808

 84,976

 84,176

 83,354

 82,575

 81,713

 80,849

 80,080

 83,227

 88,182

 89,152

 89,601

 89,878

 90,073

 90,242

 90,372

1,031

758

827

1,016

858

719

646

865

932

912

947

1,015

1,046

1,055

977

769

965

736

897

945

863

961

870

1,750

1,667

737

660

572

499

682

469

617

362

433

718

529

486

439

442

538

497

533

603

628

634

554

347

546

333

483

552

428

525

482

3,337

4,165

1,226

886

712

597

767

535

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

OCTOBER 2010 FULL NATURAL FLOW AT NEW MELONES DAM RUN DATE: 11/01/2010

TOTALS -7,364 23,934

* October 1, 47,473

 1.2

 1.9

 2.8

 4.2

 5.3

 6.2

 7.1

 8.0

 9.1

 10.0

 11.1

 12.3

 13.5

 14.8

 15.9

 16.6

 17.7

 18.3

 19.3

 20.4

 21.2

 22.3

 23.2

 29.8

 38.1

 40.5

 42.3

 43.7

 44.9

 46.4

 47.5

DONNELLS

RES

BEARDSLEY

RES

2010 TO DATE

NEW

MELONES

INFLOW

C.F.S

NATURAL

RIVER

C.F.S

ACCUM *

FULL

NATURAL

1000 A.F.

RESERVOIR

TOTAL

-822

-785

-781

-591

-652

-463

-410

-839

-782

-823

-821

-817

-830

-835

-839

-838

-832

-800

-822

-779

-862

-864

-769

+3,147

+4,955

+970

+449

+277

+195

+169

+130

CHANGE

A.F. C.F.S.

-414

-396

-394

-298

-329

-233

-207

-423

-394

-415

-414

-412

-418

-421

-423

-422

-419

-403

-414

-393

-435

-436

-388

+1,587

+2,498

+489

+226

+140

+98

+85

+66
### §§427 to 429. Omitted

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

This subchapter has not been funded since fiscal year 1975.

Section 427, Pub. L. 85–864, title II, §207, Sept. 2, 1958, 72 Stat. 1587; Pub. L. 96–88, title III, §301(a)(1), title V, §507, Oct. 17, 1979, 93 Stat. 677, 692, related to loans to help finance an institution's capital contribution to a student loan fund.

Section 428, Pub. L. 85–864, title II, §208, Sept. 2, 1958, 72 Stat. 1587; Pub. L. 96–88, title III, §301(a)(1), title V, §507, Oct. 17, 1979, 93 Stat. 677, 692, related to payments to cover reductions in amounts of student loans.

Section 429, Pub. L. 85–864, title II, §209, Sept. 2, 1958, 72 Stat. 1587; Pub. L. 96–88, title III, §301(a)(1), title V, §507, Oct. 17, 1979, 93 Stat. 677, 692, contained administrative provisions relating to modification of agreements and loans, compromise, waiver, or release of rights, and finality and conclusiveness of financial transactions and vouchers of the Secretary.
(No. 35259.

#### Al Doelling *et al.,*Appellants, *vs.*Board of Education of Community School District No. 88, Washington County, Appellee.

*Opinion filed June 11, 1959*

Rehearing *denied September 22, 1959.*

F. E. Merrills, of Belleville, for appellants.

Lindauer, Lindauer, Pessin & Nieman, of Belleville, for appellee.

Mr. Justice Klingbiel

delivered the opinion of the court:

On November 6, 1958, certain residents of Community High School District No. 88, Washington County, filed a petition in the circuit court to contest an election at which the proposition was approved to build an addition on the high school and issue bonds in the amount of $300,000. The petition was not verifiedand upon defendant’s motion *146the proceeding was dismissed for lack of jurisdiction, on December 8, 1958. Plaintiffs thereafter, on December 26, 1958, sought leave to. amend, accompanying their motion with a form of jurat to be made part of the petition. The motion was overruled, and plaintiffs appeal.

To reverse tbe order plaintiffs present, under the heading “Points and Authorities,” a number of quotations. No argument is made, other than a general statement that defendant’s contentions in the trial court do violence to the law. We think the circuit court was correct in overruling the motion to amend. An election contest is a statutory proceeding, and the procedure prescribed therefor must be strictly followed. *(Girhard*v. *Vost,*344 Ill. 483.) It has been said that “the requirement that the person desiring to contest an election shall file a statement, verified by affidavit, is jurisdictional, and if . the'statement is not sworn to . the court has no jurisdiction of the cause.” *Flake*v. *Pretzel,*381 Ill. 498, 501.

By the requirements of sections 23 — 20 and 23 — 24 of .the Election Code (Ill. Rev. Stat. 1957, chap. 46, pars. 23 — 20 and 23 — 24,) the procedures of which are made applicable to school elections by section gA — 20 of the School Code (Ill. Rev. Stat. 1957, chap. 122, par. 5A — 20,) the petition must be verified and it must be filed within 30 days after the result of the election has been determined. In the present case no verification appeared, the 30-day period had expired before motion to amend was made, and the order dismissing the petition had already been rendered.

In election contests there must be finality and to this end the legislature added the provision making the verification. of the petition a jurisdictional requirement.

The orders of the circuit court dismissing the petition and denying leave to amend are affirmed.

*Orders*affirmed,
§ 10.423 May compensation payments be assigned to, or attached by, creditors? ( a ) As a general rule, compensation and claims for compensation are exempt from the claims of private creditors. Further, any attempt by a FECA beneficiary to assign his or her claim is null and void. However, pursuant to provisions of the Social Security Act, 42 U.S.C. 659, and regulations issued by the Office of Personnel Management (OPM) at 5 CFR part 581, FECA benefits, including survivor's benefits, may be garnished to collect overdue alimony and child support payments.
( b ) Garnishment for child support and alimony may be requested by providing a copy of the State agency or court order to the district office handling the FECA claim.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY ELEV

 1,901.17

 1,901.25

 1,901.05

 1,900.76

 1,901.13

 1,901.60

 1,900.96

 1,901.08

 1,901.26

 1,901.19

 1,901.05

 1,900.92

 1,900.92

 1,901.16

 1,901.06

 1,901.03

 1,901.03

 1,901.09

 1,901.45

 1,901.66

 1,901.73

 1,901.43

 1,900.93

 1,900.98

 1,901.00

 1,900.90

 1,901.02

 1,901.18

 1,901.32

 1,901.18

 1,901.10

 14,038

 14,098

 13,948

 13,734

 14,008

 14,360

 13,882

 13,971

 14,105

 14,053

 13,948

 13,852

 13,852

 14,031

 13,956

 13,933

 13,933

 13,978

 14,248

 14,405

 14,457

 14,233

 13,859

 13,896

 13,911

 13,837

 13,926

 14,046

 14,150

 14,046

 13,986

STORAGE

+156

+60

-150

-214

+274

+352

-478

+89

+134

-52

-105

-96

+0

+179

-75

-23

+0

+45

+270

+157

+52

-224

-374

+37

+15

-74

+89

+120

+104

-104

-60

CHANGE

379

330

225

192

439

477

60

345

369

274

248

253

300

390

262

290

300

323

436

379

326

187

112

319

308

263

345

360

352

248

270

INFLOW

 0

 0

 80

 80

 80

 80

 80

 80

 80

 80

 70

 80

 80

 80

 80

 80

 80

 80

 80

 80

 80

 80

 80

 80

 80

 80

 80

 80

 80

 80

 80

POWER

 150

 150

 70

 70

 70

 70

 70

 70

 70

 70

 28

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

SPILL

 150

 150

 150

 150

 150

 150

 150

 150

 150

 150

 202

 220

 220

 220

 220

 220

 220

 220

 220

 220

 220

 220

 220

 220

 220

 220

 220

 220

 220

 220

 220

OUTLETS

 0

 0

 1

 0

 1

 0

 1

 0

 1

 0

 1

 1

 0

 0

 0

 2

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 1

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

C.F.S.

 .00

 .08

 .03

 .02

 .06

 .00

 .06

 .02

 .03

 .00

 .03

 .03

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .09

 .01

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .01

 .05

 .01

 .02

 .00

 .02

 .00

 .01

 .01

 .01

INCHES

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

DECEMBER 2001 LEWISTON LAKE DAILY OPERATIONS RUN DATE: January 24, 2002

IN LAKE

EVAPORATION

C.F.S. FRANCIS CARR

COMPUTED*

ACRE-FEET

RELEASE - C.F.S. 

TOTALS +104 9,361 2,310 6,102 888 9 .60

ACRE-FEET +104 18,568 4,582 12,103 1,761 18

* COMPUTED INFLOW IS THE SUM OF CHANGE IN STORAGE, RELEASES AND EVAPORATION.

(1) OUTLET RELEASE INCLUDES THE CONTINUOUS FISH RELEASE OF 75 C.F.S.

(2) INCHES OF EVAPORATION TAKEN FROM PAN AT TRINITY RIVER HATCHERY

SUMMARY

RELEASE (ACRE-FEET)

TOTAL POWER 4,582

TOTAL RIVER 18,446 18,446

 13,882

 0

RIVER

JUDGE FRANCIS CARR POWERPLANT

TOTAL RELEASE

JUDGE (2)

(1) POWERPLANT

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

Table 6
<PAGE>

                                  TERMINATION OF TAX
                            ALLOCATION AND INDEMNIFICATION
                                      AGREEMENT

     Lone Star Steel Company, a Delaware corporation ("Steel"), and Lone Star
Technologies, Inc., a Delaware corporation ("LSST"), are parties to that certain
Tax Allocation and Indemnification Agreement dated as of May 16, 1991 (the "Tax
Agreement").

                                     WITNESSETH:

     WHEREAS, when Steel entered into the Tax Agreement with LSST, 80.5% of its
capital stock was owned by LSST; and

     WHEREAS, since January 22, 1997, all of Steel's capital stock is owned by
LSST and there is no longer any need for a tax sharing agreement between Steel
and LSST;

     NOW THEREFORE, Steel and Parent hereby terminate the Tax Agreement,
effective as of July 1, 1997.

     IN WITNESS WHEREOF, Steel and LSST have executed this Agreement as of July
1, 1997.

                                       LONE STAR STEEL COMPANY



                                       By: /s/ R.W. Arp
                                          -------------------------------------
                                           Name:  R.W. Arp
                                                 ------------------------------
                                           Title: Executive Vice President
                                                 ------------------------------

                                       LONE STAR TECHNOLOGIES, INC.



                                       By: /s/ John P. Harbin
                                          -------------------------------------
                                          Name:   John P. Harbin
                                                 ------------------------------
                                          Title:  Chairman and Chief Executive
                                                  Officer
                                                 ------------------------------
Exhibit






 
        


Exhibit 10(a)


PARKER-HANNIFIN CORPORATION


SUMMARY OF THE COMPENSATION OF THE NON-EMPLOYEE MEMBERS OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS
Adopted August 15, 2018 and September 7, 2018 
Effective October 24, 2018






Annual retainer for Corporate Governance and Nominating
Committee Chair and Lead Director:                               $200,000


Annual retainer for Audit Committee Chair:                  $165,000


Annual retainer for Human Resources and Compensation
Committee Chair:                                               $165,000


Annual retainer for non-chair committee members:     $140,000


Meeting fees of $2,000 for attending each Board of Directors or Committee meeting that exceeds the number of regularly-scheduled meetings of the Board and relevant Committee in a fiscal year by more than two.


Annual restricted stock unit grant
#### § 225.23 Combined Earnings PIA used in survivor annuities.

The Combined Earnings PIA used in survivor annuities may be used in computing the tier II component when the survivor tier II is based on a percentage of the employee annuity tier II and the employee had been or would be, if he or she were still alive, entitled to a vested dual benefit. If the employee received a retirement annuity before death, this PIA is identical to the retirement Combined Earnings Dual Benefit PIA described in subpart B of this part. If a retirement annuity was not paid before the employee's death, the PIA is determined as if the employee were 65 years old in the month of his or her death. The Combined Earnings PIA used in survivor annuities is determined in accordance with section 215 of the Social Security Act as in effect on December 31, 1974. It is computed using the deceased employee's combined railroad and social security earnings after 1950 (or after 1936 if a higher PIA would result) through December 31, 1974.
(No. 74-CC-200

#### Central Office Equipment Company, Claimant, *vs.*State of Illinois, Department of Mental Health, Respondent.

*Opinion filed April 8, 1974.*

Central Office Equipment Company, Claimant, pro se.

William J. Scott, Attorney General; Howard W. Feldman, Assistant Attorney General, for Respondent.

Per Curiam.
#### J. L. Stevens & Company v. Riley Kirk.

Filed April 21, 1898.

No. 8041.

Conflicting Evidence: Review. A verdict found upon substantially conflicting evidence will not be disturbed in this court.

Error from the district court of Pierce county. Tried below before Robinson, J.

*Affirmed.*

*670*H. Z. Wedgwood*and *W. W. Quivey,*for plaintiffs in error.

*O. J. Frost*and *Robertson & Wigton, contra.*

Sullivan, J.

The plaintiffs, who are real estate brokers, brought this action in the district court for Pierce county to recover $175 claimed to be due them as a commission for negotiating a sale of defendant’s farm. The issues formed were tried to a jury, who found in favor of the defendant. The trial court approved the finding and rendered judgment accordingly. By this proceeding in error a reversal of the judgment is sought on the ground that the verdict does not rest upon sufficient evidence. Nothing would be gained by an extended review of the evidence. We have given it a careful examination and see no reason to find fault with the conclusion of the jury. The judgment is right and is

Affirmed.
**CERTIFICATIONS**     I, Michael K. Farrell, certify that:     1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on    Form 10-Q    of MetLife Insurance Company of Connecticut;     2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any    untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material    fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the    circumstances under which such statements were made, not    misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;     3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and    other financial information included in this report, fairly    present in all material respects the financial condition,    results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of,    and for, the periods presented in this report;     4. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I    are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure    controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act    Rules 13a-15(e)    and    15d-15(e))    for the registrant and have:     a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or    caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed    under our supervision, to ensure that material information    relating to the registrant, including its consolidated    subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those    entities, particularly during the period in which this report is    being prepared;     b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s    disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report    our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure    controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by    this report based on such evaluation; and     c) Disclosed in this report any change in the    registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that    occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter    (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an    annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably    likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal    control over financial reporting; and     5. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I    have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal    control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s    auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board    of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):     a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in    the design or operation of internal control over financial    reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the    registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and    report financial information; and     b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves    management or other employees who have a significant role in the    registrant’s internal control over financial reporting. /s/  Michael    K. Farrell    Michael K. Farrell*President*     Date: May 11, 2007