alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ENACTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of United Bancorp, Inc. (the "Company")
on Form 10-Q for the period ending June 30, 2006 as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Randall M.
Greenwood, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, as enacteD pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that:

     (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
          of the Company.


/s/ Randall M. Greenwood
----------------------------------------
Randall M. Greenwood
Senior Vice President and Chief
Financial Officer

August 14, 2006
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

DAY HIGH

 314

 299

 301

 307

 322

 308

 309

 315

 313

 316

 317

 327

 321

 315

 317

 325

 312

 315

 315

 324

 315

 310

 301

 292

 292

 294

 291

 281

 283

 283

 267

 270

 268

 287

 288

 291

 273

 296

 301

 271

 282

 295

 290

 277

 269

 285

 291

 292

 293

 289

 290

 294

 265

 257

 269

 267

 253

 247

 257

 259

 290

 289

 283

 296

 302

 302

 297

 304

 306

 306

 305

 310

 309

 299

 290

 298

 303

 304

 305

 305

 303

 300

 289

 282

 283

 281

 276

 271

 271

 272

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

APRIL 2009 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: May 1, 2009

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

FARRAR PARK AT DUTCH SLOUGH
§ 7.42 Authorized relabeling activities by brewers and importers. ( a ) *Relabeling at brewery premises.* A brewer may relabel domestically bottled malt beverages prior to removal from, and after return to bond at, the brewery premises, with labels covered by a certificate of label approval (COLA) without obtaining separate permission from TTB for the relabeling activity, provided that the brewer is the certificate holder (and bottler).
( b ) *Relabeling after removal from brewery premises.* A brewer may relabel domestically bottled malt beverages (or direct the relabeling of such malt beverages by an authorized agent) after removal from brewery premises with labels covered by a COLA, without obtaining separate permission from TTB for the relabeling activity, provided that the brewer is the certificate holder (and bottler).
( c ) *Relabeling in customs custody.* Under the supervision of U.S. customs officers, imported malt beverages in containers in customs custody may be relabeled without obtaining separate permission from TTB for the relabeling activity. Such containers must bear labels covered by a certificate of label approval (COLA) upon their removal from customs custody for consumption. See § 7.24(b).
( d ) *Relabeling after removal from customs custody.* The importer of malt beverages in containers may relabel such malt beverages (or direct the relabeling of such malt beverages by an authorized agent) after removal from customs custody without obtaining separate permission from TTB for the relabeling activity, as long as the labels are covered by a COLA.
(DYKEMA LOGO)
    
    400 Renaissance Center 
Detroit, Michigan 48243www.dykema.com
Tel: (313) 568-6800
Fax: (313) 568-6658
  
 Re:
    
    Prospectus Supplement to Registration Statement on Form S-3 (Reg. No. 333-170581)




---



##### 








---



##### 



D ykema G ossett pllc
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY

 41,478

 40,830

 40,552

 40,008

 39,846

 39,336

 38,843

 38,242

 38,451

 38,661

 38,671

 38,608

 38,493

 38,458

 38,472

 38,544

 38,537

 38,597

 38,682

 38,668

 38,600

 38,359

 38,167

 37,582

 36,920

 36,376

 36,509

 36,352

 36,366

 35,978

 34,998

 59,741

 59,343

 58,560

 58,035

 57,124

 57,594

 58,182

 58,838

 58,661

 58,507

 58,542

 58,649

 58,814

 58,915

 58,939

 58,927

 58,981

 58,969

 58,939

 58,998

 59,129

 59,408

 59,634

 60,193

 60,821

 61,271

 61,055

 61,169

 61,079

 61,397

 62,318

STORAGE - A.F. 

 101,219

 100,173

 99,112

 98,043

 96,970

 96,930

 97,025

 97,080

 97,112

 97,168

 97,213

 97,257

 97,307

 97,373

 97,411

 97,471

 97,518

 97,566

 97,621

 97,666

 97,729

 97,767

 97,801

 97,775

 97,741

 97,647

 97,564

 97,521

 97,445

 97,375

 97,316

1,144

1,067

1,165

1,093

1,094

921

582

595

545

459

486

507

485

558

550

580

514

432

473

489

625

508

557

582

558

556

121

436

412

578

280

599

540

630

554

553

901

630

623

561

487

509

529

510

591

569

610

538

456

501

512

657

527

574

569

541

509

79

414

374

121

-1,700

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

OCTOBER 2019 FULL NATURAL FLOW AT NEW MELONES DAM RUN DATE: 11/01/2019

TOTALS -4,984 14,068

* October 1, 27,904

 1.2

 2.3

 3.5

 4.6

 5.7

 7.5

 8.7

 10.0

 11.1

 12.1

 13.1

 14.1

 15.1

 16.3

 17.4

 18.6

 19.7

 20.6

 21.6

 22.6

 23.9

 25.0

 26.1

 27.2

 28.3

 29.3

 29.5

 30.3

 31.0

 31.3

 27.9

DONNELLS

RES

BEARDSLEY

RES

2019 TO DATE

NEW

MELONES

INFLOW

C.F.S

NATURAL

RIVER

C.F.S

ACCUM *

FULL

NATURAL

1000 A.F.

RESERVOIR

TOTAL

-1,081

-1,046

-1,061

-1,069

-1,073

-40

+95

+55

+32

+56

+45

+44

+50

+66

+38

+60

+47

+48

+55

+45

+63

+38

+34

-26

-34

-94

-83

-43

-76

-70

-59

CHANGE

A.F. C.F.S.

-545

-527

-535

-539

-541

-20

+48

+28

+16

+28

+23

+22

+25

+33

+19

+30

+24

+24

+28

+23

+32

+19

+17

-13

-17

-47

-42

-22

-38

-35

-30
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
 WASHINGTON, DC 20549
 FORM 8-K
 CURRENT REPORT PURSUANT
TO SECTION 13 OR 15(D) OF THE
SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
 July 11, 2011  Date of report (Date of earliest event reported)
 Professional Veterinary Products, Ltd.
  
 000-26326
    
    37-1119387(Commission File Number)
    
    (IRS Employer Identification No.)10077 South 134th StreetOmaha, NE
    
    68138(Address of Principal Executive Offices)
    
    (Zip Code)
 
   o
    
    Written communications pursuant to Rule 425 under the Securities
Act (17 CFR 230.425)o
    
    Soliciting material pursuant to Rule 14a-12 under the Exchange Act
(17 CFR 240.14a-12)o
    
    Pre-commencement communications pursuant to Rule 14d-2(b) under
the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.14d-2(b))o
    
    Pre-commencement communications pursuant to Rule 13e-4(c) under
the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.13e-4(c))




---



##### 



Item 7.01. Regulation FD Disclosure.
   Item 9.01. Financial Statements and Exhibits.
  Exhibit No.
    
    Description99.1
    
    Monthly Operating Report for the period from June 1, 2011
through June 30, 2011.




---



##### 








---



##### 



SIGNATURES
  Professional Veterinary Products, Ltd.Date: July 11, 2011
    By:
    /s/  Vicky WinklerName:
    Vicky WinklerTitle:
    President and CEO




---



##### 



EXHIBIT INDEX
 Exhibit No.
    
    Description99.1
    
    Monthly Operating Report for the period from June 1, 2011
through June 30, 2011.
§ 1011.110 What are the criteria for the small employer HIRE Vets Medallion Award? ( a ) *Gold Award.* To qualify for a small employer gold HIRE Vets Medallion Award, an employer must satisfy all of the following criteria: ( 1 ) The employer is a small employer as specified in § 1011.015 of this part;
( 2 ) The employer is not found ineligible under § 1011.120 of this part; and
( 3 ) The employer has achieved at least one of the following: ( i ) Veterans constitute not less than 7 percent of all employees hired by such employer during the prior calendar year; or
( ii ) The employer has achieved both of the following: ( A ) The employer has retained not less than 75 percent of the veteran employees hired during the calendar year preceding the preceding calendar year for a period of at least 12 months from the date on which the employees were hired; and
( B ) On December 31 of the year prior to the year in which the employer applies for the HIRE Vets Medallion Award, at least 7 percent of the employer's employees were veterans.
( b ) *Platinum Award.* To qualify for a small employer platinum HIRE Vets Medallion Award, an employer must satisfy all of the following criteria: ( 1 ) The employer is a small employer as specified in § 1011.015 of this part;
( 2 ) The employer is not found ineligible under § 1011.120 of this part;
( 3 ) The employer has achieved at least one of the following: ( i ) Veterans constitute not less than 10 percent of all employees hired by such employer during the prior calendar year; or
( ii ) The employer has achieved both of the following: ( A ) The employer has retained not less than 85 percent of the veteran employees hired during the calendar year preceding the preceding calendar year for a period of at least 12 months from the date on which the employees were hired; and
( B ) On December 31 of the year prior to the year in which the employer applies for the HIRE Vets Medallion Award, at least 10 percent of the employer's employees were veterans; and
( 4 ) The employer has at least two of the following forms of integration assistance: ( i ) The employer has established an employee veteran organization or resource group to assist new veteran employees with integration, including coaching and mentoring;
( ii ) The employer has established programs to enhance the leadership skills of veteran employees during their employment;
( iii ) The employer has established a human resources veterans' initiative;
( iv ) The employer provides each of its employees serving on active duty in the United States National Guard or Reserve with compensation sufficient, in combination with the employee's active duty pay, to achieve a combined level of income commensurate with the employee's salary prior to undertaking active duty;
( v ) The employer has a tuition assistance program to support veteran employees' attendance in post-secondary education during the term of their employment.
**UN PUBLISHED** 

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

**No. 12**  **- 6384** 

MICHAEL A. WILLIAMS , Plaintiff

- Appellant ,

v.
MARSHAL GRIFFIN; OFFICER FOX; OFFICER GRAY; OFFICER ALPERSTEIN; OFFICER ANDERSON; OFFICER CLARK; JOSEPH M. LIGHTSEY; MADONNA GODWIN, Nurse; STEVE DOLINSKI, Head Director of Nursing , Defendants

– Appellees,
JOSEPH M. LIGHTSEY; MADONNA GODWIN, Nurse; STEVE DOLINSKI, Head Director of Nursing , Defendants

.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina , at Raleigh

. Louise W. Flanagan , District Judge. ( 5:10

- ct

- 03122

- FL )

Submitted : June 14, 2012 Decided: June 19, 2012

Before WILKINSON, NIEMEYER, and KEENAN , Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by un published per curiam opinion

.
Michael Antwon Williams, Appellant Pro Se. Elizabeth F. Parsons, Assistant Attorney General, Raleigh, North Carolina; Elizabeth Pharr McCullough, Kelly Elizabeth Street, YOUNG, MOORE2 & HEND ERSON, PA, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.3 PER CURIAM:
Michael A

. Williams appeals the district court ’ s order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint

. We
have revi ewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district

court. Williams v. Griffin , No. 5:10

- ct

- 03122

- FL (E.D.N.C. Feb.
22, 2012) . We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional

process.

AFFIRMED
#### Benjamin A. Whisler and Robert F. McKinney, Respondents, v. Henry G. Cole, Appellant.

Judgment unanimously affirmed, with costs, on *921opinion of Van Kirk, J., at Special Term. (Reported in 81 Misc. Rep. 519.)
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY ELEV

 572.21

 572.11

 571.69

 571.14

 570.45

 570.07

 569.56

 569.00

 568.40

 567.81

 567.32

 566.93

 566.69

 566.31

 566.12

 565.52

 564.74

 563.81

 563.25

 562.66

 562.16

 561.70

 561.00

 560.43

 559.91

 559.31

 559.35

 558.92

 558.48

 557.85

 556.95

 492.6

 492.1

 490.1

 487.5

 484.3

 482.5

 480.1

 477.5

 474.7

 471.9

 469.6

 467.8

 466.7

 465.0

 464.1

 461.4

 457.8

 453.6

 451.0

 448.4

 446.1

 444.1

 440.9

 438.4

 436.1

 433.4

 433.6

 431.7

 429.8

 427.0

 423.1

STORAGE

+0.1

-0.5

-2.0

-2.6

-3.2

-1.8

-2.4

-2.6

-2.8

-2.7

-2.3

-1.8

-1.1

-1.8

-0.9

-2.8

-3.6

-4.2

-2.5

-2.7

-2.2

-2.1

-3.1

-2.5

-2.3

-2.7

+0.2

-1.9

-1.9

-2.8

-3.9

CHANGE

5,683

5,458

4,809

4,584

3,976

4,413

4,056

4,155

4,301

4,156

4,142

4,139

4,328

4,001

4,436

3,469

3,008

2,515

2,925

2,470

2,744

3,116

2,598

2,967

3,202

2,782

3,750

2,746

3,089

2,718

2,160

INFLOW

 1,169

 1,162

 1,170

 1,184

 1,102

 1,031

 955

 988

 1,095

 1,109

 1,041

 983

 980

 905

 947

 980

 954

 957

 887

 830

 764

 807

 767

 718

 769

 797

 739

 692

 639

 621

 674

MADERA

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

SPILL

 4,062

 4,130

 4,216

 4,296

 4,120

 3,883

 3,889

 4,096

 4,197

 4,025

 3,844

 3,655

 3,491

 3,564

 3,531

 3,479

 3,440

 3,284

 2,911

 2,588

 2,708

 2,943

 3,008

 3,118

 3,195

 2,932

 2,513

 2,612

 3,026

 3,099

 3,074

FRIANT-KERN

 52

 54

 75

 64

 40

 47

 67

 45

 69

 56

 49

 58

 60

 62

 46

 44

 59

 54

 53

 42

 55

 55

 51

 58

 52

 41

 60

 51

 51

 45

 47

C.F.S.

 .34

 .35

 .49

 .42

 .26

 .31

 .44

 .30

 .46

 .37

 .33

 .39

 .40

 .42

 .31

 .30

 .40

 .37

 .36

 .29

 .38

 .38

 .35

 .40

 .36

 .29

 .42

 .36

 .36

 .32

 .33

INCHES

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

PRECIP

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

AUGUST 2011 MILLERTON LAKE DAILY OPERATIONS RUN DATE: September 1, 2011

IN LAKE

EVAPORATION

INCHES

C.F.S.

COMPUTED*

1000 ACRE-FEET

RELEASE - C.F.S. 

TOTALS -69.4 112,896 28,416 106,929 0 1,662 11.26 .00

ACRE-FEET -69,411 223,929 56,363 212,094 0 3,297

COMMENTS:

* COMPUTED INFLOW IS THE SUM OF CHANGE IN STORAGE, RELEASES, PUMPING AND EVAPORATION.

SUMMARY

RELEASE (ACRE-FEET)

CANALS

FRIANT-KERN

MADERA

 212,094

 56,363 290,045

PRECIPITATION

THIS MONTH =

JULY 1, 2011 TO DATE = 0.00

 492.5

 21,588 0.00

CANALS

AT FRIANT

TOTAL RELEASES

OUTLET

 352

 352

 351

 351

 351

 352

 351

 350

 350

 350

 353

 354

 354

 353

 353

 353

 353

 352

 352

 351

 351

 350

 350

 350

 350

 351

 349

 349

 349

 349

 348

RIVER

 10,884

 21,588

RIVER
### §7305. Short title

This part may be cited as the "State and Local Transferability Act".

(Pub. L. 89–10, title V, §5101, formerly title VI, §6121, as added Pub. L. 107–110, title VI, §601, Jan. 8, 2002, 115 Stat. 1876; renumbered title V, §5101, and amended Pub. L. 114–95, title V, §§5001(a)(1), 5002(3), Dec. 10, 2015, 129 Stat. 2039, 2040.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Prior Provisions

A prior section 5101 of Pub. L. 89–10 was classified to section 7201 of this title prior to repeal by Pub. L. 114–95.

Another prior section 5101 of Pub. L. 89–10 was classified to section 7201 of this title, prior to the general amendment of former subchapter V of this chapter by Pub. L. 107–110.

Another prior section 5101 of Pub. L. 89–10 was classified to section 3171 of this title, prior to the general amendment of Pub. L. 89–10 by Pub. L. 103–382.

#### Amendments

2015—Pub. L. 114–95, §5002(3), substituted "part" for "subpart".

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date of 2015 Amendment

Amendment by Pub. L. 114–95 effective Dec. 10, 2015, except with respect to certain noncompetitive programs and competitive programs, see section 5 of Pub. L. 114–95, set out as a note under section 6301 of this title.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

DAY HIGH

 29,750

 30,487

 31,570

 31,730

 32,020

 31,029

 30,167

 29,801

 28,289

 27,596

 28,530

 29,053

 29,218

 29,256

 30,158

 30,799

 30,033

 30,408

 29,336

 29,267

 29,277

 28,771

 27,922

 27,856

 28,220

 28,318

 28,691

 29,985

 29,858

 30,995

 16,946

 18,349

 17,090

 17,628

 17,918

 17,266

 17,969

 17,899

 18,290

 18,401

 18,876

 19,436

 18,593

 18,549

 18,515

 18,214

 18,270

 18,477

 18,646

 19,339

 19,749

 19,290

 19,234

 19,300

 20,196

 19,411

 19,738

 19,539

 19,101

 19,115

 22,451

 23,417

 23,627

 24,244

 24,315

 23,896

 23,912

 23,967

 23,320

 23,192

 23,834

 23,788

 23,480

 23,311

 23,414

 23,867

 24,225

 24,390

 24,014

 24,137

 24,257

 23,678

 23,428

 23,612

 23,840

 23,590

 23,771

 24,638

 24,400

 24,651

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

SEPTEMBER 2014 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: October 1, 2014

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

PORT CHICAGO BOTTOM IN SUISUN BAY
#### Mary L. B. Phinney *v.*Joseph W. Rosgen, Executor (Estate of Edith M. B. Jones)

*Clifton F. Weidlich,*in support of the motion.

Submitted September 1

decided November 3, 1970

The motion by the plaintiff for an order to make a finding in the appeal from the Superior Court in Litchfield County is denied.
### §§9881, 9882. Repealed. Pub. L. 111–358, title X, §1002(a)(5), Jan. 4, 2011, 124 Stat. 4048

Section 9881, Pub. L. 110–69, title VI, §6501, Aug. 9, 2007, 121 Stat. 674, related to mathematics and science partnership bonus grants.

Section 9882, Pub. L. 110–69, title VI, §6502, Aug. 9, 2007, 121 Stat. 675, related to authorization of appropriations.
§ 1002.225 Is the employee entitled to any specific reemployment benefits if he or she has a disability that was incurred in, or aggravated during, the period of service? Yes. A disabled service member is entitled, to the same extent as any other individual, to the escalator position he or she would have attained but for uniformed service. If the employee has a disability incurred in, or aggravated during, the period of service in the uniformed services, the employer must make reasonable efforts to accommodate that disability and to help the employee become qualified to perform the duties of his or her reemployment position. If the employee is not qualified for reemployment in the escalator position because of a disability after reasonable efforts by the employer to accommodate the disability and to help the employee to become qualified, the employee must be reemployed in a position according to the following priority. The employer must make reasonable efforts to accommodate the employee's disability and to help him or her to become qualified to perform the duties of one of these positions: ( a ) A position that is equivalent in seniority, status, and pay to the escalator position; or,
( b ) A position that is the nearest approximation to the equivalent position, consistent with the circumstances of the employee's case, in terms of seniority, status, and pay. A position that is the nearest approximation to the equivalent position may be a higher or lower position, depending on the circumstances.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
COMPANY'S CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET AS OF SEPTEMBER 26, 1997, AND ITS
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS FOR THE TWO FISCAL QUARTERS ENDED
SEPTEMBER 26, 1997, WHICH WERE FILED WITH THE SEC ON NOVEMBER 10, 1997 ON FORM
10-Q FOR THE QUARTER ENDED SEPTEMBER 26, 1997 (COMMISSION NUMBER 1-9037) AND IS
QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS. (AMOUNTS
IN THOUSANDS EXCEPT PER SHARE DATA)
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAR-27-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             MAR-29-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-26-1997
<CASH>                                          62,247
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  120,836
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               197,318
<PP&E>                                         140,618
<DEPRECIATION>                                 100,024
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 337,051
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           95,260
<BONDS>                                         65,711
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                      6,386
<COMMON>                                            97
<OTHER-SE>                                     159,784
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   337,051
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               201,021
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  178,185
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 4,611
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               2,149
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  1,738
<INCOME-TAX>                                     2,730
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              (992)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     (992)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  $(0.42)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY HIGH

 661

 657

 661

 664

 663

 664

 664

 662

 662

 661

 663

 663

 666

 663

 663

 663

 665

 665

 665

 668

 667

 666

 666

 669

 670

 670

 673

 672

 667

 668

 669

 655

 656

 656

 658

 656

 657

 658

 658

 658

 659

 660

 658

 660

 660

 662

 655

 662

 662

 663

 664

 664

 663

 663

 660

 666

 666

 665

 662

 663

 664

 664

 657

 657

 658

 661

 659

 660

 660

 661

 660

 661

 661

 661

 662

 662

 662

 662

 663

 663

 664

 665

 666

 665

 664

 665

 667

 668

 669

 667

 665

 666

 666

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

JULY 2015 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: August 21, 2015

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

DELTA MENDOTA CANAL AT CHECK 13 (O'NEILL)
#### William E. Mowbray v. Harriet De Forest, etc.

Motion d'enied, with ten dollars costs. Present — Ingraham, P. J., Clarke, Scott, Dowling and Hotchkiss, JJ.