alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 23
 W. R. Berkley Corporation Profit Sharing Plan
 Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
#### § 1002.62 Does USERRA cover a member of the Commissioned Corps of the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, the Civil Air Patrol, or the Coast Guard Auxiliary?

No. Although the Commissioned Corps of the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) is a “uniformed service” for some purposes, it is not included in USERRA's definition of this term. Service in the Civil Air Patrol and the Coast Guard Auxiliary similarly is not considered “service in the uniformed services” for purposes of USERRA. Consequently, service performed in the Commissioned Corps of the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), the Civil Air Patrol, and the Coast Guard Auxiliary is not protected by USERRA.
ANNUAL
      STATEMENT AS TO COMPLIANCE


OFFICER'S
      CERTIFICATE






Re:
      LB-UBS Commercial Mortgage Trust 2005-C2





In
      accordance with Section 3.13 of the Pooling and Servicing Agreement, (the
“Agreement”), dated as of April 11, 2005 executed by and between Structured
      Asset Securities Corporation II, (as "Depositor"), Wells Fargo Bank National
      Association, (as “Master Servicer”), Lennar Partners, Inc., (as “Special
      Servicer”), LaSalle Bank National Association, (as “Trustee”), and ABN AMRO Bank
      N.V., (as “Fiscal Agent”) as authorized officer of the Master Servicer I certify
      that (i) a review of the activities of the Master Servicer during the preceding
      calendar year or portion thereof and of the performance of such Master Servicer
      under this Agreement has been made under such officer’s supervision, (ii) to the
      best of such officer’s knowledge, based on such review, such Master Servicer has
      fulfilled all its obligations under this Agreement in all material respects
      throughout such year, and (iii) the Master Servicer has received no notice
      regarding qualification, or challenging the status, of any REMIC pool as a
      REMIC
      or the Grantor Trust as a grantor trust, from the IRS or any other governmental
      agency or body.





Wells
      Fargo Bank, National Association


“Master
      Servicer”










/s/
      Margaret Gremore


Margaret
      Gremore


Vice
      President


Wells
      Fargo Bank, National Association


Commercial
      Mortgage
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

DAY HIGH

 1,732

 2,169

 2,055

 1,776

 2,110

 1,438

 1,796

 233

 185

 381

 321

 161

 148

 170

 957

 1,739

 891

 1,264

 2,233

 2,441

 2,328

 2,718

 3,432

 4,595

 4,848

 6,662

 6,453

 6,751

 6,923

 6,951

 245

 232

 222

 182

 182

 173

 184

 120

 122

 120

 102

 90

 106

 126

 100

 142

 130

 150

 156

 162

 155

 176

 199

 249

 301

 435

 492

 497

 554

 453

 612

 649

 588

 492

 425

 385

 625

 181

 145

 159

 139

 126

 134

 145

 308

 396

 229

 296

 494

 489

 528

 692

 1,316

 1,912

 2,085

 2,739

 2,584

 2,603

 2,784

 2,671

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

APRIL 2018 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: May 1, 2018

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

PORT CHICAGO TOP IN SUISUN BAY
Exhibit 32
CERTIFICATION OF ANNUAL REPORT ON FORM 10-K
OF
NATIONAL BANCSHARES CORPORATION
FOR THE FISCAL YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2003
          The undersigned are the President and Treasurer of National BancsharesCorporation. This Certification is made pursuant to Section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. This Certification accompanies the Annual Reporton Form 10-K of National Bancshares Corporation for the fiscal year endedDecember 31, 2003.
          We certify that the Annual Report on Form 10-K fully complies with therequirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934and that the information contained in the 10-K Report fairly presents in allmaterial respects the financial condition and results of operations of NationalBancshares Corporation.
          This Certification is executed as of March 26, 2004.     /s/ Charles J. Dolezal  Charles J. Dolezal, President and Chief Executive Officer    /s/ Lawrence M. Cardinal, Jr.  Lawrence M. Cardinal, Jr., Treasurer (principal financial officer)
###### Editorial Note on Part 40

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 40 appear by T.D. ATF-460, 66 FR 39094-39096, July 27, 2001; T.D. ATF-464, 66 FR 43479, Aug. 20, 2001; and T.D. TTB-91, 76 FR 5479, Feb. 1, 2011.

#### § 40.312 Action by the appropriate TTB officer.

Upon receipt of a schedule of tobacco products withdrawn from the market, the appropriate TTB officer may assign a TTB officer to verify the schedule and supervise disposition of the tobacco products (and destruction of the stamps, if any), or he may authorize the manufacturer to dispose of the products (and destroy the stamps, if any) without supervision by so stating on the original and one copy of the schedule returned to the manufacturer.

[T.D. 6871, 31 FR 39, Jan. 4, 1966. Redesignated at 40 FR 16835, Apr. 15, 1975, as amended by T.D. ATF-232, 51 FR 28083, Aug. 5, 1986; T.D. ATF-243, 51 FR 43194, Dec. 1, 1986]
§ 234.21 Definitions of “living with” and “living in the same household.” ( a ) *Living with.* A widow(er) is considered “living with” the employee at the time of the employee's death, if one of the following conditions applies: ( 1 ) The employee and spouse were members of the same household;
( 2 ) The spouse was receiving regular contributions for support from the employee; or
( 3 ) The employee was under court order to contribute to the spouse's support.
( b ) ( 1 ) *Living in the same household.* An employee and spouse were “living in the same household” if they lived together as a married couple in the same residence. However, an employee and spouse, who were temporarily living apart, will be considered “living in the same household” if there was intent to share the same residence had the employee not died. The Board will usually assume that a married couple was living apart temporarily, if the separation was caused by circumstances beyond their control, for example, ill health, financial difficulties, service with the Armed Forces, or confinement in a curative, custodial, or penal institution.
( 2 ) If the employee and spouse were separated solely for medical reasons, the Board will consider them “living in the same household,” even if the separation was likely to be permanent.
### subpart 1—private schools
I 

116TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 5597 

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located at 

305 Northwest 5th Street in Oklahoma City, Oklahoma, as the ‘‘Clara 

Luper Post Office Building’’. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JANUARY 14, 2020 

Ms. KENDRA S. HORN of Oklahoma (for herself, Mr. KEVIN HERN of Oklahoma, Mr. MULLIN, Mr. LUCAS, and Mr. COLE) introduced the following 

bill; which was referred to the Committee on Oversight and Reform 

A BILL 

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service 

located at 305 Northwest 5th Street in Oklahoma City, 

Oklahoma, as the ‘‘Clara Luper Post Office Building’’. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. CLARA LUPER POST OFFICE BUILDING. 

4 (a) DESIGNATION.—The facility of the United States 

5 Postal Service located at 305 Northwest 5th Street in 

6 Oklahoma City, Oklahoma, shall be known and designated 

7 as the ‘‘Clara Luper Post Office Building’’. 

8 (b) REFERENCES.—Any reference in a law, map, reg9 ulation, document, paper, or other record of the United 


pamtmann on DSKBC07HB2PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 5597 IH

1 States to the facility referred to in subsection (a) shall 

2 be deemed to be a reference to the ‘‘Clara Luper Post Of3 fice Building’’. 

Æ 


pamtmann on DSKBC07HB2PROD with BILLS
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY HIGH

 26,392

 25,396

 25,029

 24,105

 23,377

 24,588

 26,270

 26,440

 29,116

 30,236

 30,704

 30,566

 27,784

 26,660

 25,782

 26,828

 27,221

 27,365

 25,922

 26,677

 27,664

 27,430

 27,673

 27,134

 26,387

 25,995

 27,271

 27,590

 26,038

 25,206

 23,961

 15,615

 13,892

 13,770

 15,268

 14,269

 15,681

 15,975

 15,873

 16,563

 16,769

 15,946

 14,884

 12,934

 12,223

 10,180

 11,143

 13,816

 11,131

 10,487

 9,298

 10,666

 14,450

 13,456

 13,675

 15,157

 14,687

 9,081

 15,795

 9,059

 8,672

 8,887

 21,145

 19,713

 19,636

 18,984

 18,652

 19,028

 20,046

 21,304

 22,414

 23,129

 23,047

 22,591

 20,348

 21,027

 16,766

 20,646

 20,829

 20,153

 16,221

 15,463

 19,599

 19,774

 20,227

 20,211

 20,646

 21,039

 20,608

 21,109

 17,385

 17,572

 17,797

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

JULY 2014 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: August 8, 2014

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

PORT CHICAGO TOP IN SUISUN BAY
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

DAY HIGH

 258

 251

 268

 251

 234

 225

 426

 262

 217

 208

 203

 196

 195

 190

 186

 182

 561

 2,160

 3,191

 3,748

 4,895

 7,030

 7,136

 7,811

 7,188

 8,220

 10,508

 6,727

 219

 221

 218

 217

 199

 194

 196

 193

 179

 180

 178

 174

 171

 169

 165

 169

 170

 174

 174

 231

 362

 386

 556

 713

 894

 1,057

 971

 1,001

 237

 234

 232

 228

 216

 206

 219

 210

 199

 190

 186

 180

 179

 176

 173

 176

 205

 423

 743

 1,482

 2,157

 3,502

 3,654

 4,499

 4,232

 4,190

 5,001

 4,373

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

FEBRUARY 2006 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: March 7, 2006

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

PORT CHICAGO TOP IN SUISUN BAY
Exhibit 23.1

CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the following Registration
Statements of our reports dated April 12, 2005, relating to the financial statements and financial
statement schedule of Sigma Designs, Inc. and management's report on the effectiveness of internal
control over financial reporting, appearing in this Annual Report on Form 10-K of Sigma Designs,
Inc. for the year ended January 31, 2005:

Registration Statement No. 333-86875 on Form S-8
   Registration Statement No. 333-64234 on Form S-8
   Registration Statement No. 333-83126 on Form S-8
   Registration Statement No. 333-103513 on Form S-8
   Registration Statement No. 333-106978 on Form S-8
   Registration Statement No. 333-114374 on Form S-8
   Registration Statement No. 333-122323 on Form S-3/A

/s/ Deloitte & Touche LLP

San Jose, California
April 12, 2005

---
ON PETITION FOR REHEARING

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 02-7256

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

versus

ROOSEVELT CORNELL SANDERS,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of

South Carolina, at Columbia. Matthew J. Perry, Jr., Senior District

Judge. (CR-94-631, CA-02-993-0-10)

Submitted: February 11, 2003 Decided: March 21, 2003

Before NIEMEYER and GREGORY, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior

Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Roosevelt Cornell Sanders, Appellant Pro Se. Marvin Jennings

Caughman, Assistant United States Attorney, Columbia, South

Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Roosevelt Cornell Sanders appeals the district court’s order

denying relief on his motion filed under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (2000).

We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error.

Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district

court. United States v. Sanders, Nos. CR-94-631; CA-02-993-0-10

(D.S.C. Aug. 5, 2002). We dispense with oral argument because the

facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the

materials before the court and argument would not aid the

decisional process.

AFFIRMED
§ 219.57 Evidence of a parent's support. ( a ) The Board will require the parent's signed statement showing his or her income, any other sources of support, the amount from each source and his or her expenses during the one-year period.
( b ) The Board may also ask the parent for signed statements from other people who know the facts about his or her sources of support.
( c ) If the statements described in paragraphs (a) and (b) of this section cannot be obtained, the Board will require other convincing evidence that the parent is receiving one-half of his or her support from the employee.
(Approved by the Office of Management and Budget under control number 3220-0099)
§ 10.210 What are the employee's responsibilities in COP cases? An employee who sustains a traumatic injury which he or she considers disabling, or someone authorized to act on his or her behalf, must take the following actions to ensure continuing eligibility for COP. The employee must: ( a ) Complete and submit Form CA-1 to the employing agency as soon as possible, but no later than 30 days from the date the traumatic injury occurred.
( b ) Ensure that medical evidence supporting disability resulting from the claimed traumatic injury, including a statement as to when the employee can return to his or her date of injury job, is provided to the employer within 10 calendar days after filing the claim for COP.
( c ) Ensure that relevant medical evidence is submitted to OWCP, and cooperate with OWCP in developing the claim.
( d ) Ensure that the treating physician specifies work limitations and provides them to the employer and/or representatives of OWCP.
( e ) Provide to the treating physician a description of any specific alternative positions offered the employee, and ensure that the treating physician responds promptly to the employer and/or OWCP, with an opinion as to whether and how soon the employee could perform that or any other specific position.
###### Editorial Note on Part 70

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 70 appear by T.D. ATF-450, 66 FR 29022-29030, May 29, 2001.

#### § 70.21 Canvass for taxable persons and objects.

Each appropriate TTB officer shall, to the extent deemed practicable, cause officers or employees under the appropriate TTB officer's supervision and control to proceed, from time to time, and inquire after and concerning all persons therein who may be liable to pay any tax, imposed under provisions of 26 U.S.C. enforced and administered by the Bureau, and all persons owning or having the care and management of any objects with respect to which such tax is imposed.

[T.D. ATF-331, 57 FR 40327, Sept. 3, 1992, as amended by T.D. ATF-450, 66 FR 29023, May 29, 2001]
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY HIGH

 17,235

 18,216

 19,694

 19,549

 19,537

 20,579

 19,855

 20,164

 19,758

 20,648

 18,118

 17,793

 16,509

 12,872

 16,005

 13,884

 15,166

 16,675

 18,465

 17,742

 16,998

 18,168

 14,898

 18,231

 18,348

 17,048

 16,248

 15,608

 15,834

 17,259

 17,969

 8,713

 9,275

 9,787

 8,952

 8,034

 7,557

 7,153

 7,366

 8,116

 8,407

 8,270

 7,992

 8,089

 5,535

 8,268

 6,646

 6,323

 6,482

 6,572

 5,737

 4,548

 3,854

 3,391

 4,994

 6,487

 5,792

 5,997

 6,908

 7,324

 6,582

 6,306

 13,110

 13,900

 14,935

 13,864

 13,345

 14,300

 13,806

 14,244

 14,051

 14,689

 13,624

 13,395

 12,829

 9,397

 11,917

 10,731

 10,840

 11,371

 11,974

 11,740

 10,989

 11,037

 10,391

 11,299

 12,967

 12,039

 11,530

 11,466

 11,740

 11,739

 12,035

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

MARCH 2021 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: April 2, 2021

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

PORT CHICAGO BOTTOM IN SUISUN BAY
§ 219.8 Preferred evidence and other evidence. ( a ) *Preferred evidence.* When a claimant submits the type of evidence shown as preferred in subparts B and C of this part, the Board will generally find it is convincing evidence. This means that unless there is information in the Board's records that raises a doubt about the evidence, other evidence to prove the same fact will not be needed.
( b ) *Other evidence.* If preferred evidence is not available, the Board will consider any other evidence a claimant furnishes. If the other evidence consists of several different records or documents which all show the same information, the Board may determine that it is convincing evidence even though it is not preferred evidence. If the other evidence is not convincing by itself, the claimant will be asked to submit additional evidence. If the additional evidence shows the same information all the evidence considered together may be convincing evidence.
( c ) *Board decision.* When the Board has convincing evidence of the facts that must be proven, or when it is clear that the evidence provided does not prove the necessary facts, the Board will make a formal decision about the applicant's rights to benefits.
§ 9.79 Lake Michigan Shore. ( a ) *Name.* The name of the viticultural area described in this section is “Lake Michigan Shore.”
( b ) *Approved maps.* The appropriate maps for determining the boundaries of the Lake Michigan Shore viticultural area are four U.S.G.S. maps, 1:250,000 series. They are entitled: ( 1 ) Chicago (1953, revised 1970);
( 2 ) Fort Wayne (1953, revised 1969);
( 3 ) Racine (1958, revised 1969); and
( 4 ) Grand Rapids (1958, revised 1980).
( c ) *Boundaries.* The Lake Michigan Shore viticultural area is located in the southwestern corner of the State of Michigan. The boundaries of the Lake Michigan Shore viticultural area, using landmarks and points of reference found on the appropriate U.S.G.S maps, are as follows: ( 1 ) Starting at the most northern point, the intersection the Kalamazoo River with Lake Michigan.
( 2 ) Then southeast along the winding course of the Kalamazoo River for approximately 35 miles until it intersects the Penn Central railroad line just south of the City of Otsego.
( 3 ) Then south along the Penn Central railroad line, through the City of Kalamazoo, approximately 25 miles until it intersects the Grand Trunk Western railroad line at the community of Schoolcraft.
( 4 ) Then southwest along the Grand Trunk Western railroad line approximately 35 miles to the Michigan/ Indiana State line.
( 5 ) Then west along the Michigan-Indiana State line approximately 38 miles until it meets Lake Michigan.
( 6 ) Then north along the eastern shore of Lake Michigan approximately 72 miles to the beginning point.
[T.D. ATF-153, 48 FR 46526, Oct. 13, 1983, as amended by T.D. ATF-249, 52 FR 5959, Feb. 27, 1987]
Exhibit 4.6
 US AIRWAYS GROUP, INC.
2011 INCENTIVE AWARD PLAN
RESTRICTED STOCK UNIT (STOCK-SETTLED) AWARD GRANT NOTICE
 Company Plan Restricted Stock Units Award Award Agreement
 Participant: ______________________________
 Date of Grant: ___________, 20____
 Number of Restricted Stock Units: __________________________
  -
    
    ____ % of the Restricted Stock Units shall vest on ___________, 20___;
 -
    
    ____ % of the Restricted Stock Units shall vest on ___________, 20___; and
 -
    
    ____ % of the Restricted Stock Units shall vest on ___________, 20__.




---



##### 



US AIRWAYS GROUP, INC.
2011 INCENTIVE AWARD PLAN
RESTRICTED STOCK UNIT AWARD AGREEMENT
 Grant Notice Award Agreement Company Plan Restricted Stock Units Award
  1. NUMBER OF RESTRICTED STOCK UNITS AND SHARES OF COMPANY STOCK Company Stock
 2. VESTING provided however
     3. DIVIDENDS provided that further provided that




---



##### 



4. PAYMENT
 5. DELIVERY OF SHARES Designated Broker
 6. COMPLIANCE WITH APPLICABLE LAW.
 7. TRANSFER RESTRICTIONS
 8. AWARD NOT A SERVICE CONTRACT
 9. UNSECURED OBLIGATION
 2




---



##### 



10. WITHHOLDING OBLIGATIONS
     11. NOTICES
 12. MISCELLANEOUS
  3




---



##### 



13. DATA PRIVACY WAIVER.
 Data
     14. HEADINGS
 15. SEVERABILITY
 16. GOVERNING PLAN DOCUMENT
 4




---



##### 



5
EXHIBIT 31.2

Rule 13a-14 Certification 

I, Kenneth L. Buckler, Chief Financial Officer of Capital Builders, Inc., certify that:

- I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of Capital Builders Development Properties II (the "Registrant").;

2. Based on my knowledge, this annual report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this annual report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this annual report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. The registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, is made known to us by others within the registrant, particularly during the period in which this annual report is being prepared;

b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent fiscal year that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting; and

5. The registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

- All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal controls over financial reporting which were reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial data; and 
- Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting. 

 

March 28, 2005

 

__________________________________________

Kenneth L. Buckler

Chief Financial Officer