alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

DAY HIGH

 225

 231

 250

 240

 230

 247

 280

 313

 303

 308

 308

 316

 347

 414

 398

 428

 456

 414

 403

 356

 358

 369

 363

 354

 344

 347

 351

 343

 332

 341

 187

 193

 220

 217

 218

 212

 210

 215

 216

 215

 212

 208

 209

 212

 207

 209

 208

 211

 209

 212

 219

 221

 217

 221

 221

 227

 231

 225

 229

 233

 212

 214

 231

 226

 224

 229

 245

 252

 262

 261

 257

 253

 267

 282

 282

 295

 304

 304

 300

 287

 282

 294

 284

 287

 281

 285

 293

 286

 287

 286

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

SEPTEMBER 2011 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: October 19, 2011

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

DELTA MENDOTA CANAL AT CHECK 13 (O'NEILL)
#### § 10.901 Which employees are covered under this subpart?

For purposes of this subpart, the term “employee” means all employees defined in 5 U.S.C. 8101 and § 10.5 of this part and all non-appropriated fund instrumentality employees as defined in 10 U.S.C. 1587(a)(1).
EMPLOYEE AGREEMENT AMENDMENT


EXHIBIT 10.5




EMPLOYEE AGREEMENT AMENDMENT




THIS AGREEMENT (the “Agreement”) is made and entered into on June 19, 2015 by and between SharpSpring, Inc., a Delaware corporation (the “Company”) and Richard Carlson (“Employee”).  




1.

This Agreement amends that certain Employee Agreement dated September 8, 2014 made and entered into by the parties hereto (the “Employee Agreement”). Capitalized terms herein have the same meaning as used in the Employee Agreement, unless otherwise noted.




2.

The Vesting Schedule contained in Item I. of Appendix B of the Employee Agreement is amended to read as follows: 




Vesting Schedule: The options vest as follows: 50% vest on December 31, 2016; 25% vest on December 31, 2017; and 25% vest on December 31, 2018. The option grant shall be made pursuant to SMTP’s 2010 Employee Stock Plan and subject to the terms of the SMTP Employee Stock Plan’s standard non-statutory stock option agreement. 




3.

Item II. shall be inserted into Appendix B of the Employee Agreement, which shall read as follows:

 

II.

Quarterly Bonus Compensation: 




Employee shall be eligible for bonus compensation that will be paid on a quarterly basis (the “Quarterly Bonus”) that will be earned and payable as follows: 




The annual bonus target amount is $20,000 (the Quarterly Bonus target amount is $5,000), and will be based on the performance of the executive group and the individual Employee and based upon overall SMTP, Inc. performance. 




The Quarterly Bonus is earned at the close of the applicable quarter and is intended to be paid shortly after SMTP, Inc reports its financials publicly each quarter.




If Employee’s employment is terminated for any reason, Employee shall be paid (a) the full Quarterly Bonus earned, as determined solely by SMTP’s Board of Directors, for the most recently completed quarter and if Employee’s employment is terminated by the Company or by mutual agreement, Employee shall be paid (b) a pro-rated Quarterly Bonus, as determined solely by SMTP’s Board of Directors, for the calendar quarter in which termination occurs.  




4.

All other provisions of the Employee Agreement remain in full force and effect, other than any provision that conflicts with the terms and spirit of this Agreement.











IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Parties have executed this Agreement on the date first written above.




				
	 
	 
	SHARPSPRING, INC.


	 
	 
	 
	 

	 
	 
	 
	 

	 
	 
	By: 

	/s/ Edward Lawton


	(Witness signature) 

	 
	 
	Edward Lawton


	 
	 
	 
	Chief Financial Officer


	 
	 
	 
	 

	 
	 
	EMPLOYEE


	 
	 
	 
	 

	 
	 
	 
	 

	 
	 
	/s/ Richard Carlson


	(Witness signature)

	 
	Richard Carlson
**EXHIBIT 12.2**

 

**FORM 10-Q**

**PACCARFINANCIAL CORP.**

 

**COMPUTATION OF RATIO OF EARNINGS TO FIXEDCHARGES**

 

**PURSUANT TO THE SUPPORT AGREEMENT**

**BETWEEN THE COMPANY AND PACCAR**

(Millions of Dollars)

 
| ** **                         | ** ** | **Nine Months Ended  September 30** | ** ** |
|------------------------------------|------------|-------------------------------------|------------|
| ** **                         | ** ** | **2004**                            | ** ** | **2003** | ** ** |
| ** **                         | ** ** | ** **                          |       |   |   |
| FIXED CHARGES                      |       |                                |       |   |   |
| Interest expense                   | ** ** | **$**                               | **48.9**   |   | $ | 61.8 |   |
| Facility and equipment rental      | ** ** | **1.4**                             |       | 1.3 |   |
|                               |       |                                |       |   |   |
| TOTAL FIXED CHARGES                | ** ** | **$**                               | **50.3**   |   | $ | 63.1 |   |
|                               |       |                                |       |   |   |
| EARNINGS                           |       |                                |       |   |   |
| Income before taxes                | ** ** | **$**                               | **81.5**   |   | $ | 55.7 |   |
| Depreciation                       | ** ** | **31.9**                            |       | 20.1 |   |
|                               |       |                                |       |   |   |
| ** **                         |       | **113.4**                           |       | 75.8 |   |
|                               |       |                                |       |   |   |
| Fixed charges                      | ** ** | **50.3**                            |       | 63.1 |   |
|                               |       |                                |       |   |   |
| EARNINGS AS DEFINED                | ** ** | **$**                               | **163.7**  |   | $ | 138.9 |   |
|                               |       |                                |       |   |   |
| RATIO OF EARNINGS TO FIXED CHARGES | ** ** | **3.25**                            | **x**      | 2.20 | x |

 

1

----
EXHIBIT 10 (e)

                         Letter dated January 7, 1999



<PAGE>

                                Law Offices
                      KATZ, KARACIC, HELMIN & ADDIS, P.C.

                                 Suite 3001
                           100 North LaSalle Street
                            Chicago, Illinois 60601
                                 (312) 236-4111
                             Fax (312) 236-6325



                                January 7, 1999



Mr. Ronald Grindstaff, President
Pacific Aero Manufacturing, Inc.
33850 United Avenue
Pueblo, Colorado 81001

     Re:  33850 United Avenue, Pueblo, Colorado
          Our File Number: 15447     

Dear Mr. Grindstaff:

     This letter is to confirm our agreement to amend that certain Commercial
Contract to Buy and Sell Real Estate dated June 1, 1998 by and between Pacific
Aero Manufacturing, Inc. and Stevia Company, Inc. (The "Contract") as follows:

     1.  The date of closing shall be January 29, 1999, or by mutual agreement
at an earlier date.  The hour and place of closing shall be determined by the
mutual agreement of the parties.

     2.  Section 1 of the Rider to the Contract shall be amended to indicate
that the remaining proportion of the purchase price to be paid at closing will
be $460,000, rather than $450,000.

     3.  In addition to the $15,000 of earnest money delivered under the terms
of the Contract, Buyer hereby agrees that the earnest money shall include the
security deposit delivered to the Seller under the terms of that certain Lease
Agreement dated September 1, 1993 by and between the Buyer and Seller.

     4.  This amendment is contingent upon Buyer delivering an executed copy
of this amendment and the increased rent payment as provided in Section 7 of
the Rider to the above-referenced Agreement on or before January 11, 1998.

     5.  In all other respects, the above-referenced contract shall remain in
full force and effect.

<PAGE>

Mr. Ronald Grindstaff, President
January 7, 1999
Page 2

     If this extension meets with your approval, please so indicate by
executing a copy of this letter and returning it to the undersigned at your
earliest convenience, but in no event later than January 11, 1999.

                              Sincerely,

                              KATZ, KARACIC, HELMIN & ADDIS, P.C.

                              /s/ LAUANE C. ADDIS /s/
                             --------------------------------------------
                              Lauane C. Addis on behalf of Stevia
                              Company, Inc. and as Receiver

ACCEPTED:

Pacific Aero Manufacturing, Inc.


    /s/ RONALD GRINDSTAFF /s/
By: ------------------------------------                           
     Ronald Grindstaff, President

                                    E-1
<PAGE>
### S 1 0-100518
..020 

# KANAWHA COUNTY COMMISSION

Post Office Box 3627 Telephone(304) 357-0101 Charleston, West Virginia 25336 Fax (304) 357·0788
Henry C. Shores W. Kent Carper David J. "Dave" Hardy Commissioner Commissioner Commissioner May 4, 2010
The Honorable Raymond H. LaHood Secretary U.S. Department ofTransportation 1200 New Jersey Ave, SE Washington, DC 20590 Docket DOT-OST-2010'­
DearMr. Secretary: Thankyou for the opportunity to express (my/our) support for the application for 

## a!riitrust inununity and proposedjointbusiness agreement filed by American Airlines and Japan Airlines. The proposed alliance betweenthesetwo airlines is vital for oneworld to compete effectively with the Starand SkyTeam alliance. This increased interalliance competition will in tumenhance the benefits ofilie Department's Open Skies policy­ :firstby solidifying U.SAapan Open Skies, then by serving as a fOlmdation for further liberalization across Asia. After a thorough review, (Ilwe) encourage the Department ofTransportation to approve this application as it would enable these oneworld alliance airlines to work closely togetherto deliverhighly competitive air transportation services. Approval for AA1JAL alliance will have apositive impact on airtravel by offering customers more service,
. scheduling and pricing options and will help to ensure that customers continue to benefit from having three competitive air alliances to choose from. Iurge you to quickly approve this application. Sincerely, 

# ;0.
#### § 10.509 If an employee's light duty job is eliminated due to downsizing, what is the effect on compensation?

In general, an employee will not be considered to have experienced a compensable recurrence of disability as defined in § 10.5(x) merely because his or her employer has eliminated the employee's light-duty position in a reduction-in-force or some other form of downsizing. When this occurs, OWCP will determine the employee's wage-earning capacity based on his or her actual earnings in such light-duty position if this determination is appropriate on the basis that such earnings fairly and reasonably represent the employee's wage-earning capacity and such a determination has not already been made and the employing agency has stated, in writing, that no other employment is available.
### §§3821 to 3823. Repealed. Pub. L. 100–297, title I, §1003(a), Apr. 28, 1988, 102 Stat. 293

Section 3821, Pub. L. 97–35, title V, §571, Aug. 13, 1981, 95 Stat. 472, related to use of funds for program of basic skills development.

Section 3822, Pub. L. 97–35, title V, §572, Aug. 13, 1981, 95 Stat. 472, related to State leadership and support services.

Section 3823, Pub. L. 97–35, title V, §573, Aug. 13, 1981, 95 Stat. 473; Pub. L. 98–211, §14, Dec. 8, 1983, 97 Stat. 1416, related to school level programs.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date of Repeal

Repeal effective July 1, 1988, see section 6303 of Pub. L. 100–297, set out as an Effective Date of 1988 Amendment note under section 1071 of this title.
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

MEMORANDUM OPINION

No. 04-14-00335-CR

David Gene SMITH,

Appellant

v.

The STATE of Texas,

Appellee

From the 186th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2013CR4917

Honorable Maria Teresa Herr, Judge Presiding

PER CURIAM

Sitting: Catherine Stone, Chief Justice

Karen Angelini, Justice

Luz Elena D. Chapa, Justice

Delivered and Filed: June 11, 2014

DISMISSED

David Gene Smith entered into a plea bargain with the State, pursuant to which he pleaded 

nolo contendere to aggravated assault with a deadly weapon and true to the State’s enhancement 

allegations. The trial court imposed sentence in accordance with the agreement and signed a 

certificate stating this “is a plea-bargain case, and the defendant has NO right of appeal.” Smith 

timely filed a notice of appeal. The clerk’s record, which includes the trial court’s rule 25.2(a)(2) 

certification and a written plea bargain agreement, has been filed. See TEX. R. APP. P. 25.2(d).
04-14-00335-CR

The clerk’s record establishes the punishment assessed by the court does not exceed the 

punishment recommended by the prosecutor and agreed to by the defendant and that the trial court 

denied permission to appeal. See TEX. R. APP. P. 25.2(a)(2). We have reviewed the clerk’s record, 

and the trial court’s certification appears to accurately state that this is a plea bargain case and 

Smith does not have a right to appeal. See Dears v. State, 154 S.W.3d 610 (Tex. Crim. App. 2005) 

(holding that court of appeals should review clerk’s record to determine whether trial court’s 

certification is accurate). This court must dismiss an appeal “if a certification that shows the 

defendant has the right of appeal has not been made part of the record.” TEX. R. APP. P. 25.2(d).

On May 21, 2014, we gave Smith notice that the appeal would be dismissed unless an 

amended trial court certification showing he has the right to appeal has been made part of the 

appellate record by June 4, 2014. See TEX. R. APP. P. 25.2(d); 37.1; Daniels v. State, 110 S.W.3d 

174 (Tex. App.—San Antonio 2003, order), disp. on merits, No. 04-03-00176-CR, 2003 WL 

21508347 (July 2, 2003, pet. ref’d) (not designated for publication). An amended certification 

showing Smith has the right to appeal has not been filed. We therefore dismiss this appeal. TEX.

R. APP. P. 25.2(d).

PER CURIAM

DO NOT PUBLISH

- 2 -
CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
  /s/ Deloitte Touche Tohmatsu CPA Ltd.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY

 9,700

 9,767

 9,880

 9,927

 9,695

 9,494

 9,284

 9,302

 9,410

 9,245

 9,103

 9,090

 9,149

 9,340

 9,494

 9,479

 9,548

 9,564

 9,180

 9,180

 9,105

 9,029

 8,650

 8,336

 8,065

 7,796

 7,379

 7,083

 6,997

 6,840

 7,125

 25,819

 25,552

 25,402

 25,280

 25,411

 25,583

 25,692

 25,529

 25,280

 25,280

 25,362

 25,425

 25,583

 25,774

 26,096

 26,558

 26,879

 27,211

 27,909

 28,603

 29,264

 29,759

 30,148

 31,010

 31,640

 32,220

 32,964

 33,654

 34,235

 34,963

 35,630

STORAGE - A.F. 

 35,519

 35,319

 35,282

 35,207

 35,106

 35,077

 34,976

 34,831

 34,690

 34,525

 34,465

 34,515

 34,732

 35,114

 35,590

 36,037

 36,427

 36,775

 37,089

 37,783

 38,369

 38,788

 38,798

 39,346

 39,705

 40,016

 40,343

 40,737

 41,232

 41,803

 42,755

685

851

788

987

873

1,031

880

727

802

845

851

813

995

1,104

1,180

1,041

716

896

1,154

1,114

1,220

1,215

891

719

818

971

959

1,036

1,188

892

1,673

538

750

769

949

822

1,016

829

654

731

762

821

838

1,104

1,297

1,420

1,266

913

1,071

1,312

1,464

1,515

1,426

896

995

999

1,128

1,124

1,235

1,438

1,180

2,153

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

MARCH 2013 FULL NATURAL FLOW AT NEW MELONES DAM RUN DATE: 05/10/2013

TOTALS +6,944 33,415

* October 1, 66,279

 221.4

 222.9

 224.4

 226.3

 227.9

 229.9

 231.6

 232.9

 234.3

 235.8

 237.5

 239.1

 241.3

 243.9

 246.7

 249.2

 251.0

 253.2

 255.8

 258.7

 261.7

 264.5

 266.3

 268.3

 270.2

 272.5

 274.7

 277.2

 280.0

 282.3

 286.6

DONNELLS

RES

BEARDSLEY

RES

2012 TO DATE

NEW

MELONES

INFLOW

C.F.S

NATURAL

RIVER

C.F.S

ACCUM *

FULL

NATURAL

1000 A.F.

RESERVOIR

TOTAL

-292

-200

-37

-75

-101

-29

-101

-145

-141

-165

-60

+50

+217

+382

+476

+447

+390

+348

+314

+694

+586

+419

+10

+548

+359

+311

+327

+394

+495

+571

+952

CHANGE

A.F. C.F.S.

-147

-101

-19

-38

-51

-15

-51

-73

-71

-83

-30

+25

+109

+193

+240

+225

+197

+175

+158

+350

+295

+211

+5

+276

+181

+157

+165

+199

+250

+288

+480
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

DAY HIGH

 27,917

 26,079

 26,498

 26,493

 27,328

 27,808

 28,005

 28,431

 28,689

 30,183

 28,789

 27,953

 27,303

 25,323

 25,742

 26,289

 27,180

 28,260

 29,367

 29,411

 29,551

 30,431

 28,853

 28,766

 28,425

 28,727

 28,736

 28,355

 28,593

 28,291

 18,828

 17,956

 17,337

 16,446

 15,841

 16,320

 16,503

 15,793

 15,895

 16,512

 17,567

 17,305

 16,415

 16,778

 16,232

 16,523

 16,926

 19,434

 19,024

 18,756

 18,262

 18,293

 16,392

 16,306

 16,385

 15,715

 17,240

 18,098

 18,662

 18,678

 23,670

 22,092

 21,666

 21,277

 21,481

 22,066

 22,174

 22,394

 22,716

 23,907

 23,666

 22,962

 22,841

 22,272

 21,764

 21,309

 21,932

 23,346

 24,417

 24,422

 24,246

 24,430

 23,246

 22,916

 22,509

 22,840

 23,472

 24,073

 24,603

 23,982

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

NOVEMBER 2014 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: December 1, 2014

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

PORT CHICAGO BOTTOM IN SUISUN BAY
August 18 , 2014

The Honorable Anthony R. Foxx

Secretary

U.S. Department of Transportation

1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE

Washington, DC 20590

Dear Secretary Foxx:

The U.S. Travel Association, a national non

- profit representing all aspects of the American travel industry,

reaffirms its support for Norwegian Air International’s (NAI) exemption and foreign air carrier permit

application s currently pending before the Depar tment of Transportation (DOT). NAI’s new low

- cost

transatlantic service, if app roved, would increase inbound international travel, boost U.S. exports, and provide

new ladders of opportunity for Americans by creating travel jobs.

In all 50 states, travel is an engine of job creation and economic growth. In 2013, direct travel spending in

the United States exceeded $887 billion, which generated a total of $2.1 trillion in economic output. The travel

community employs 14.9 million A mericans and is among the top 10 employers in 49 U.S. states and the

District of Columbia. Inbound international travel is our cou ntry’s top services export. F or the first half of

2014, travel exports have grown 6.2 percent, representing 21 percent of U. S. export growth year

- over

- year

.

Norwegian Air International’s transatlantic service will facilitate economic growth and serve the public interest

in many important ways, such as providing travelers with expanded air service and more flight options,

spurr ing greater airline competition along critical international routes, an d allowing U.S. cities to expand

visitation from key international growth markets

. With its low

- fare, point

- to

- point model, NAI’s service will

help achieve President Obama’s worthy national goal of attracting 100 million new international visitors to

the United States by 2021.

Approval of NAI’s exemption and foreign air carrier permit applications also will reaffirm the U.S.

commitment to its long

- standing and successful policy of Open Skies, which has opened new markets and

broken down barriers for domestic and international carriers alike.

Because of the substantial economic and social benefits that would result from NAI’s expanded air se rvice to

the U.S, the U.S. Travel Association urges the DOT to render a timely decision and approve NAI.

I look forward to working with you on this and other important issues to increase travel to and within the

United States.

Sincerely,

Roger J. Dow

President and CEO

U.S. Travel Association
###### Editorial Note on Part 479

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 479 appear by T.D. ATF-487, 68 FR 3752, Jan. 24, 2003.

#### § 479.39 Engaging in more than one business at the same location.

If more than one business taxable under 26 U.S.C. 5801, is carried on at the same location during a taxable year, the special (occupational) tax imposed on each such business must be paid. This section does not require a qualified manufacturer or importer to qualify as a dealer if such manufacturer or importer also engages in business on his qualified premises as a dealer. However, a qualified manufacturer who engages in business as an importer must also qualify as an importer. Further, a qualified dealer is not entitled to engage in business as a manufacturer or importer.

[36 FR 14256, Aug. 3, 1971. Redesignated at 40 FR 16835, Apr. 15, 1975, and amended by T.D. ATF-48, 44 FR 55842, Sept. 28, 1979; T.D. ATF-271, 53 FR 17551, May 17, 1988]
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

DAY HIGH

 10,135

 14,932

 12,445

 10,987

 11,952

 11,744

 9,858

 8,462

 10,402

 11,032

 8,726

 8,886

 8,384

 9,473

 9,193

 8,312

 7,888

 5,511

 3,878

 4,468

 4,140

 3,676

 980

 969

 5,947

 12,769

 14,663

 10,697

 7,464

 9,214

 863

 2,177

 2,264

 2,228

 1,791

 998

 801

 664

 723

 558

 488

 391

 596

 633

 487

 955

 1,049

 488

 321

 318

 296

 238

 206

 188

 189

 205

 970

 262

 282

 413

 6,320

 8,633

 7,248

 6,645

 6,116

 4,810

 4,364

 3,546

 4,075

 4,065

 3,941

 3,826

 3,998

 4,658

 4,073

 3,882

 3,411

 2,152

 1,334

 1,196

 1,088

 774

 333

 294

 1,126

 4,741

 6,998

 5,120

 3,022

 4,304

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

APRIL 2000 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: May 2, 2000

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

PORT CHICAGO BOTTOM IN SUISUN BAY