alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
### §145. Penalties

Any person who knowingly violates any provision of this subchapter shall, in addition to all other penalties prescribed by law, be punished by a fine of not less than $50 nor more than $2,000, or by imprisonment for not more than one year, or by both such fine and imprisonment.

(Feb. 15, 1927, ch. 155, §5, 44 Stat. 1103.)
Just to clarify, and make sure there is no misunderstanding,

All of the FUGITIVE release heights (from shop roof vents), including the fugitives from the roof of the

Furnace 18/MOR building, are at 30.5 meters.

The Furnace 18/MOR baghouse [Source ID M SEOO13, Emission Unit ID F012, Process ID MOR-BH] is a

positive pressure baghouse whose release characteristics are best characterized in the same manner

the roof vents are treated, rather than as a point source stack. That baghouse’s release height is 13.41

meters, but these are NOT “fugitive” emissions.

Russell

ENVIRON

Russell S. Kemp, PE I Principal

ENVIRON International Corporation

1600 Parkwood Circle Suite 310 Atlanta, Georgia 30339

T: +1 678.388.1654 IF: +1 770.874.5011 I M: +1 404.374.7836

rkemp©environcorp.com

From: John Rego [mailto:jrego©JonesDay.com]

Sent: Wednesday, August 29, 2012 5:33 PM

To: Chuck French

Cc: Conrad Chin; Jeff.McKinney@erametgroup.com; lmcafee@bdlaw.com; Russell Kemp;

RLunn@fpiwv.com; Darcie Smith

Subject: Re: Fw: Proposed Ferrolloys NESHAP, additional data regarding updated Eramet Marietta model

Chuck:

30.50 meters for all but the Furnacel8/MOR baghouse, which is 13.41 meters.

John

John Rego• Environmental, Health & Safety901 LAKESIDE AVENUE CLEVELAND, OHIO 44114

DIRECT 216.586.7542 • FAX 216.579.0212.

JREGO@JONESDAY.COM
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
 Washington, D.C. 20549
 FORM 8-K
 CURRENT REPORT
Pursuant to Section 13 OR 15(d) of The Securities Exchange Act of 1934
 Date of Report (Date of earliest event reported): June 28, 2011
 Apartment Trust of America, Inc.
  Maryland

000-52612

20-3975609(State or other jurisdiction
of incorporation)

(Commission File Number)

(IRS Employer Identification No.)
 4901 Dickens Road, Suite 101, Richmond, Virginia

23230(Address of principal executive offices)

(Zip Code)
 (804) 237-1335
 
 (Former name or former address, if changed since last report.)
  o

Written communications pursuant to Rule 425 under the Securities Act (17 CFR 230.425)o

Soliciting material pursuant to Rule 14a-12 under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.14a-12)o

Pre-commencement communications pursuant to Rule 14d-2(b) under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.14d-2(b))o

Pre-commencement communications pursuant to Rule 13e-4(c) under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.13e-4(c))




---



##### 



Item 1.01 Entry into a Material Definitive Agreement
 Amendment of Limited Partnership Agreement
   Item 5.02 Departure of Directors or Certain Officers; Election of Directors; Appointment of
Certain Officers, Compensatory Arrangements of Certain Officers
 Appointment of New Chief Financial Officer
   Item 5.03 Amendments to Articles of Incorporation or Bylaws
 Amendment of Bylaws
   Item 5.07 Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders
 Election of Directors




---



##### 



Name of Director
    
    For
    
    
    WithheldStanley J. Olander, Jr.
    
    
    9,545,092.35
    
    
    
    785,130.08Andrea R. Biller
    
    
    9,584,336.77
    
    
    
    745,885.66Glenn W. Bunting, Jr.
    
    
    9,590,534.42
    
    
    
    739,688.01Robert A. Gary, IV
    
    
    9,596,175.77
    
    
    
    734,046.67Richard S. Johnson
    
    
    9,592,974.46
    
    
    
    737,247.94
 Item 8.01 Other Events
 Declaration of Distributions
  Item 9.01 Financial Statements and Exhibits.
 (d)
    
    Exhibits.
 3.1
    
    Second Amendment to Amended and Restated Bylaws of Apartment Trust of America, Inc.10.1
    
    Second Amendment to Agreement of Limited Partnership of Apartment Trust of America
Holdings, LP




---



##### 



SIGNATURE
  Apartment Trust of America, Inc.Dated:  June 30, 2011
    By:
    /s/ Gustav G. RemppiesName:
    Gustav G. RemppiesTitle:
    President




---



##### 



Exhibit Index
 Exhibit No.
    
    Description3.1
    
    Second Amendment to Amended and Restated Bylaws of Apartment Trust of America, Inc.10.1
    
    Second Amendment to Agreement of Limited Partnership of Apartment Trust of America Holdings,
LP
§ 10.735 When is a non-Federal law enforcement officer (LEO) covered under the FECA? ( a ) A law enforcement officer (officer) includes an employee of a State or local Government, the Governments of U.S. possessions and territories, or an employee of the United States pensioned or pensionable under sections 521-535 of Title 4, D.C. Code, whose functions include the activities listed in 5 U.S.C. 8191.
( b ) Benefits are available to officers who are not “employees” under 5 U.S.C. 8101, and who are determined in the discretion of OWCP to have been engaged in the activities listed in 5 U.S.C. 8191 with respect to the enforcement of crimes against the United States. Individuals who only perform administrative functions in support of officers are not considered officers.
( c ) Except as provided by 5 U.S.C. 8191 and 8192 and elsewhere in this part, the provisions of the FECA and of subparts A, B, and D through I of this part apply to officers.
**EXHIBIT 99.26** 

 

**CONSENT OF JOSEF SEDLACEK**

 

United States Securities and Exchange Commission

Gentlemen:

In connection with Silver Wheaton Corporation’s (the “Company”) Annual Report on Form 40-F for the year ended December 31, 2008 (the “Annual Report”), I, Josef Sedlacek, P.Eng., Principal Consultant (SRK Consulting (Canada) Inc.), hereby consent to the inclusion in, or incorporation by reference into, and the use of my name in connection with the preparation of the            following documents/reports:

 

| 1.     | Technical report dated June 30, 2008, entitled “Bellekeno Preliminary Economic Assessment, Technical Report, Keno Hill Mining District, Yukon”; |
|--------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   |                                                                                                                                                        |

 

Date: March 26, 2009

|   | Yours truly,/s/ Josef Sedlacek                                                                                                                                               |
|--------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   | Name: Josef Sedlacek, P.Eng. Title:   Principal Consultant,           Consulting (Canada) Incorporated |
§ 10.330 What are the requirements for medical reports? In all cases reported to OWCP, a medical report from the attending physician is required. This report should include: ( a ) Dates of examination and treatment;
( b ) History given by the employee;
( c ) Physical findings;
( d ) Results of diagnostic tests;
( e ) Diagnosis;
( f ) Course of treatment;
( g ) A description of any other conditions found but not due to the claimed injury;
( h ) The treatment given or recommended for the claimed injury;
( i ) The physician's opinion, with medical reasons, as to causal relationship between the diagnosed condition(s) and the factors or conditions of the employment;
( j ) The extent of disability affecting the employee's ability to work due to the injury;
( k ) The prognosis for recovery; and
( l ) All other material findings.
### §121. Annual report of president and directors

The president and directors of Howard University shall report to the Secretary of Education the condition of the institution on the 1st of July of each year, embracing therein the number of pupils received and discharged or leaving the same for any cause during the preceding year, and the number remaining; also, the branches of knowledge and industry taught and the progress made therein together with a statement showing the receipts of the institution and from what sources, and its disbursements, and for what objects.

(July 1, 1898, ch. 546, §1, 30 Stat. 624; 1940 Reorg. Plan No. IV, §11(c), eff. June 30, 1940, 5 F.R. 2422, 54 Stat. 1237; 1953 Reorg. Plan No. 1, §§5, 8, eff. Apr. 11, 1953, 18 F.R. 2053, 67 Stat. 631; Pub. L. 96–88, title III, §301(a)(2)(M), title V, §507, Oct. 17, 1979, 93 Stat. 678, 692.)

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Transfer of Functions

"Secretary of Education" substituted in text for "Secretary of Health, Education, and Welfare" pursuant to sections 301(a)(2)(M) and 507 of Pub. L. 96–88, which are classified to sections 3441(a)(2)(M) and 3507 of this title and which transferred all functions of Secretary of Health, Education, and Welfare under this subchapter to Secretary of Education.

#### Similar Provisions

A similar requirement of a report of the expenditures of the University accompanied the appropriation for the same purposes in the following prior acts:

Mar. 3, 1893, ch. 208, 27 Stat. 595.

Aug. 5, 1892, ch. 380, 27 Stat. 372.

Mar. 3, 1891, ch. 542, 26 Stat. 973.

#### **Executive Documents**

#### Transfer of Functions

Functions of Federal Security Administrator transferred to Secretary of Health, Education, and Welfare and all agencies of Federal Security Agency transferred to Department of Health, Education, and Welfare by section 5 of Reorg. Plan No. 1 of 1953, set out in the Appendix to Title 5, Government Organization and Employees. Federal Security Agency and office of Administrator abolished by section 8 of Reorg. Plan No. 1 of 1953.

Functions of Department of the Interior relating to administration of Howard University transferred to Federal Security Agency to be administered under direction and supervision of Federal Security Administrator, and annual report required to be furnished to Secretary of the Interior by President and directors of said University was directed to be furnished to Federal Security Administrator, by Reorg. Plan No. IV of 1940, set out in the Appendix to Title 5.
An equal opportunity employer Thomas M. Gray 211(b) Technical Manager

1220 L Street, Northwest Washington, DC 20005-4070

Tel 202-682-8480

Fax 202-682-8270 E-mail grayt@api.org

June 9, 2010

Karl Simon

Division Director Compliance and Innovative Strategies Division Office of Transportation and Air Quality 1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, N. W.

Mail Code: 6406J Washington, DC 20460

RE: CAA Section 211(b) Fuels and Fuel Additives Hea lth Effects Testing Regulation: Final Submission for 211(b) (Docket No. A-90-07) 211(b) Chronic Carcinogenicity Study Gasoline MTBE Vapor Condensate (GMVC) (LRRI Study No. FY01-013)

Dear Mr. Karl Simon:

The American Petroleum Institute (API), on behalf of the Section 211(b) Research Group (RG), is submitting the following information to EPA as partial fulfillment of the CAA Section 211(b) Alternative Tier 2 requirements of the testing regulation:

• 211(b) Chronic Carcinogenicity Study Gaso line MTBE Vapor Condensate (GMVC) (LRRI Study No. FY01-013)

The Final Report has undergone review by two independent peer-reviewers, outside QA/QC, EPA and the 211(b) Technical Workgroup. Therefore the report is being submitted to you at the EPA Office of Transportation and Air Quality, Transportation and Regional Programs Division, as part of the requirements of Clean Air Act Section 211(b)(2) and 211(e) (Docket No. A-90-07). If you require further information or have any questions regarding this submission, please contact me.

Regards,

Thomas M. Gray, M.S., DABT

Encl (1): Chronic Carcinogenicity Study Gasoline MTBE Vapor Condensate (GMVC) (LRRI Study No. FY01-013)

Cc: Joe Sopata, EPA (via email)
## NO. 12

- 21

- 00146

- CV

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS

TWELFTH COURT OF APPEALS DISTRICT

TYLER, TEXAS

RICHARD KIRBY AND J U

LIE KIRBY , APPELLANT S

V.

BENNY FLETCHER , APPELLEE §

§

§ APPEAL FROM THE

COUNTY COURT AT LAW

SMITH COUNTY, TEXAS

MEMORANDUM OPINIO N PER CURIAM This appeal is being dismissed for failure t o compl y with the Texas Rules of Appell ate

Procedure. S ee T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 42.3(c). Appellant s , Richard Kirby and Julie Kirby , filed a pro se notice of appeal on August 30
, 2021

. That same day , the Clerk of this Court notified Appellant that the no tice of appeal f ai led to contain the information specifically r equired by Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 25.1(d)

and Section 51.017(a) of the Te xas Civil Practice and Remedies Code. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 25.1(d) ( contents of notice ) ; see also T EX

. C IV

. P RA C

. & R EM

. C ODE A NN

. § 51.017(a) (We st Supp. 2019) (notice of appeal must be served on each court reporter responsible for preparing
reporter ’ s record). The notic e warned that, unless Appellant filed a pr oper notice of appeal on or

before September 9 , the appeal would be refer red to the Cou rt for dismissal. Appellan ts did not file a compliant notice of appeal or otherwise respond to this Court ’ s notice. 1
Because Appellant s failed, after notice, to comply w ith Rule 21.5(d) and Section

51.017 (a) , the appeal is dismissed

. See T EX

. R. A P P

. P. 42.3(c) (on its own initiat ive after giving

1 Pro se liti gants are h eld to the same standards as lice nsed attorneys and must comply with all applicable rules of procedure ; otherwise, pro se litigants would benefit from an unfair advantage over parties represented by counsel. Muham med v. Plai ns Pipeline, L.P. , No. 12

- 16

- 001 89

- CV, 2017 WL 2665180, at *2 n.3 (Tex. App.

— Tyler June 21, 2017, no pet.) (mem. op.)

.2 ten days ’ notice to all parties, appellate court may dismiss appeal if appeal i s subject to dismissal because appellant failed to comply with a requirement of the se rules, a court order, or a not ice

from th e clerk requiring a response or o ther action within a specified time). All pending motions

are overruled as moot

. Opinion delivered September 22 , 2021. Panel consisted of Wort hen, C.J., Hoyle, J., and Neeley, J.

## COURT OF APPEALS

TWELFTH COURT OF APPEALS DISTRICT OF TEXAS

JUDGMENT

SEPTEMBER 22 , 2021

NO. 12

- 21

- 00146

- CV

RICHARD KIRBY AND JU LIE KIRBY , Appellant s V. BENNY FLETCHER , Appellee

Appeal from the County Court at Law

of Smith County, T exas (Tr.Ct .No. 73211 )

THI S CAUSE came to be heard on the appellat e record; and the same being considered, it is the opi nion of this Court that this appeal sh ould be d ismissed

. It is ther efore OR DERED, ADJUDGED an d DECREED by this Court that the appeal be
, and the sa me is, hereb y d ismissed ; and that this decision be certified to the court

below for observance.

B y per curiam opinion

. Panel consisted of Worthen, C.J., Hoyle, J. and Neeley, J

.
Exhibit 31.2

                                  CERTIFICATION

I, Thomas Viertel, Chief Financial Officer of Presidential Realty Corporation
(the "Company") certify that:

1.    I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of the Company;

2.    Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any
      untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact
      necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances
      under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to
      the period covered by this quarterly report;

3.    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
      information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all
      material respects the financial condition, results of operations and
      cash flows of the Company as of, and for, the periods presented in
      this quarterly report;

4.    The Company's other certifying officers and I are responsible for
      establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as
      defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the
      Company and we have:

     a)    designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that
           material information relating to the Company, including its
           consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those
           entities, particularly during the period in which this quarterly
           report is being prepared;

     b)    evaluated the effectiveness of the Company's disclosure controls and
           procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the
           effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the
           end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation;
           and

     c)    disclosed in this report any changes in the Company's internal
           control over financial reporting that occurred during the Company's
           most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is
           reasonably likely to materially affect, the Company's internal
           control over financial reporting; and

5.    The Company's other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our
      most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to
      the Company's auditors and the Audit Committee of the Company's Board of
      Directors:

     a)   all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
          operation of internal control over financial reporting which are
          reasonably likely to adversely affect the Company's ability to record,
          process, summarize and report financial information; and

     b)   any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
          employees who have a significant role in the Company's internal
          control over financial reporting.


  DATE:  August 12, 2003            By: /s/ Thomas Viertel
                                      --------------------------
                                      Thomas Viertel
                                      Chief Financial Officer
Exhibit 10.17
 CARDIAC SCIENCE
EXECUTIVE INCENTIVE PLAN
2010
 SECTION 1  INTRODUCTION
 Plan Objectives
  Effective Date
  SECTION 2  DEFINITIONS
  
    
    Executive means an employee who holds a VP level position or higher.
 
    
    Participant(s) means an Executive, as the case may be, designated and approved by the
Compensation Committee and/or the Chief Executive Officer to participate in the Plan.
 SECTION 3  PLAN ADMINISTRATION
 Administration
  Participation
  Bonus Awards
    Page 1 of 4




---



##### 



Payment of Incentives
 Normal Payment
 Approved Leaves of Absence
 Death or Disability
 Participant Transfers
 Plan Changes
  Other Conditions
 Right of Assignment
 Right of Employment
   Page 2 of 4




---



##### 



Withholding for Taxes
 Section 409A
 Gender
 SECTION 4  OPERATING RULES
 Plan Design
  Bonus
 Revenue
    
    Operating Cash Flow
    
    Personal Objectives0% threshold
    
    Budget - 6%
    
    Budget  100%
    
    
    N/ATarget
    
    Budget
    
    Budget
    
    Individual2X threshold
    
    Budget + 6%
    
    Budget + 100%
    
    
    N/A
 No revenue/cash flow bonuses shall be paid where targets result in a 0% or below threshold.
Bonus amounts shall also be pro-rated between threshold levels
   Page 3 of 4




---



##### 



Target Incentives
 CEO
    
    CFO/SVP
    
    VP
    
    Sales VP100%
    
    50%
    
    30%
    
    10%
  Criteria
    
    CEO
    
    CFO/SVP
    
    VP
    
    Sales VPParticipant
    
    15%
    
    15%
    
    25%
    
    0%Company
    
    85%
    
    85%
    
    75%
    
    100%
 Individual Performance Objectives
  Company Objectives
     By:Its:Date:
   Page 4 of 4
**Exhibit 31**

 

**REPORT OF MANAGEMENT ON INTERNAL CONTROL OVER FINANCIALREPORTING**

 

The management of Bio-Reference Laboratories, Inc. (the “Company”),including its Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, isresponsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control overfinancial reporting as defined in Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f) underthe Securities Exchange Act of 1934. The Company’s internal control overfinancial reporting is a process designed to provide reasonable assurance regardingthe reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statementsfor external purposes in accordance with accounting principles generallyaccepted in the United States of America. Internal control over financialreporting includes policies and procedures that:

 

•                                          pertain to the maintenance of records that,in reasonable detail accurately and fairly reflect the transactions anddispositions of the assets of the Company;

 

•                                          provide reasonable assurance thattransactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financialstatements in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in theUnited States of American, and that receipts and expenditures of the Companyare being made only in accordance with authorization of management anddirectors of the Company; and

 

•                                          provide reasonable assurance regardingprevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use or dispositionof assets that could have a material effect on the consolidated financialstatements.

 

Management assessed the effectiveness of the Company’s internal controlover financial reporting as of October 31, 2005. Management based thisassessment on criteria for effective internal control over financial reportingdescribed in “Internal Control – Integrated Framework” issued by the Committeeof Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). Management’sassessment included an evaluation of the design of the Company’s internalcontrol over financial reporting and testing of the operating effectiveness ofits internal control over financial reporting.

 

Based on this assessment, management has determined that the Company’sinternal control over financial reporting as of October 31, 2005 iseffective. Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financialreporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Management’s assessment ofthe effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting asof October 31, 2005 has been audited by Moore Stephens, P.C., an independentregistered public accounting firm, as stated in their report attached to thisfiling, which expresses unqualified opinions on management’s assessment and onthe effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting asof October 31, 2005.

 

1

----
§ 1001.164 What is the uniform national threshold EER, and how will it be calculated? ( a ) The uniform national threshold EER for a program year is equal to 90 percent of the national EER for veterans and eligible persons (as defined in § 1001.163(c)).
( b ) The uniform national threshold EER resulting from this calculation is expressed as a percentage that is rounded to the nearest tenth of a percent.
Exhibit 23.2
 CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
 
  /s/ Ernst & Young LLP

Ernst & Young LLP