alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### Jacob Fruchtman, Trustee *v.*Frank Wernikoff

The motion by the plaintiff for this court to set aside the judgment in the appeal from the Court of Common Pleas in Hartford County is denied.

*586
      *Paul W. Orth,*for the appellant (plaintiff).

*Harry W. Hultgren, Jr.,*for the appellee (defendant).

Argued February 2

decided February 2, 1971
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

DAY HIGH

 263

 262

 265

 263

 282

 286

 292

 296

 302

 300

 303

 307

 312

 319

 318

 328

 321

 325

 327

 338

 334

 335

 337

 320

 315

 319

 326

 329

 245

 248

 253

 237

 255

 255

 255

 274

 276

 282

 285

 284

 284

 273

 263

 276

 269

 291

 287

 291

 308

 291

 274

 231

 271

 266

 263

 281

 253

 254

 258

 256

 268

 271

 276

 283

 288

 290

 293

 295

 299

 302

 292

 308

 303

 314

 311

 317

 321

 320

 305

 280

 294

 302

 294

 308

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

FEBRUARY 2002 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: March 11, 2002

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

HOLLAND TRACT ON OLD RIVER
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

DAY HIGH

 433

 458

 421

 479

 477

 506

 480

 621

 645

 718

 696

 697

 682

 696

 758

 802

 836

 847

 832

 760

 739

 714

 699

 689

 653

 614

 602

 618

 630

 643

 364

 369

 357

 355

 352

 351

 346

 395

 414

 368

 375

 410

 414

 415

 421

 422

 418

 422

 420

 397

 396

 405

 404

 413

 425

 442

 451

 445

 445

 442

 392

 393

 386

 386

 389

 380

 383

 457

 519

 514

 495

 501

 515

 517

 561

 562

 558

 558

 544

 507

 506

 504

 510

 516

 502

 499

 517

 508

 506

 520

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

NOVEMBER 2005 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE:December 6, 2005

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

TDS

 258

 259

 255

 255

 256

 251

 253

 298

 337

 334

 322

 326

 334

 336

 363

 363

 361

 361

 352

 329

 329

 327

 331

 335

 326

 324

 336

 330

 329

 337

TOTAL 14,605

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

DELTA MENDOTA CANAL AT HEADWORKS
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 02-2247

DOUGLAS G. ROBERTS, M.D.,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

TOMMY G. THOMPSON, SECRETARY, UNITED STATES

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES,

Defendant - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of

Maryland, at Greenbelt. Alexander Williams, Jr., District Judge.

(CA-02-1225-AW)

Submitted: December 19, 2002 Decided: December 31, 2002

Before WILKINS and KING, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior

Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Douglas G. Roberts, Appellant Pro Se. Jennifer Lilore Huesman,

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Baltimore, Maryland, for

Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Douglas G. Roberts appeals from the district court’s order

denying relief in his employment discrimination action. We have

reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we

affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See Roberts v.

Thompson, No. CA-02-1225-AW (D. Md. filed Sept. 19, 2002; entered

Sept. 20, 2002). We deny Roberts’ request for an injunction staying

his termination and granting backpay, interest and benefits. We

dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions

are adequately presented in the materials before the court and

argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
### §931. Regulations; issuance and contents

The Secretary of Defense shall issue regulations to carry out this chapter. Such regulations shall—

(1) prescribe the educational goals and objectives of the defense dependents' education system,

(2) establish standards for the development of curricula for the system and for the selection of instructional materials,

(3) prescribe professional standards for professional personnel employed in the system,

(4) provide for arrangements between the Director and commanders of military installations for necessary logistic support for schools of the system located on military installations,

(5) provide for a recertification program for professional personnel employed in the system, and

(6) provide for such other matters as may be necessary to ensure the efficient organization and operation of the defense dependents' education system.

(Pub. L. 95–561, title XIV, §1413, Nov. 1, 1978, 92 Stat. 2372; Pub. L. 106–65, div. A, title III, §354(6), Oct. 5, 1999, 113 Stat. 574.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

1999—Subsec. (d). Pub. L. 106–65 substituted "The Secretary" for "Not later than 180 days after July 1, 1979, the Secretary" in introductory provisions.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

DAY HIGH

 276

 288

 289

 284

 272

 266

 264

 259

 246

 232

 233

 231

 249

 243

 245

 244

 233

 218

 221

 214

 204

 206

 201

 205

 207

 209

 222

 216

 256

 256

 257

 257

 253

 249

 241

 230

 221

 219

 215

 215

 220

 224

 224

 216

 197

 190

 185

 180

 177

 180

 185

 188

 188

 190

 193

 196

 265

 269

 271

 269

 263

 256

 251

 242

 234

 225

 225

 223

 230

 234

 233

 228

 215

 203

 199

 193

 188

 189

 193

 196

 197

 198

 203

 205

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

FEBRUARY 2019 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: March 1, 2019

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

14 DAY

ACCUM

MEAN

14 DAY 

AVG

MEAN

 4,494

 4,260

 4,070

 3,938

 3,846

 3,781

 3,730

 3,689

 3,646

 3,602

 3,563

 3,523

 3,489

 3,457

 3,425

 3,384

 3,328

 3,262

 3,198

 3,135

 3,072

 3,019

 2,978

 2,949

 2,921

 2,896

 2,869

 2,840

 321

 304

 291

 281

 275

 270

 266

 264

 260

 257

 255

 252

 249

 247

 245

 242

 238

 233

 228

 224

 219

 216

 213

 211

 209

 207

 205

 203

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

JERSEY POINT TOP ON THE SAN JOAQUIN RIVER
EXHIBIT 99

                INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' REPORT OF PRIMARY BANK


Independent Auditors' Report


The Board of Directors
Primary Bank:

We have audited the accompanying balance sheets of Primary Bank as of
December 31, 1996, and the related statements of operations, 
changes in stockholders' equity, and cash flows for each of the years in 
the two-year period ended December 31, 1996.  These financial 
statements are the responsibility of the Bank's management.  Our 
responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements 
based on our audits.

We conducted our audits in accordance with generally accepted auditing 
standards.  Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit 
to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements 
are free of material misstatement.  An audit includes examining, on a 
test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the 
financial statements.  An audit also includes assessing the accounting 
principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as 
evaluating the overall financial statement presentation.  We believe 
that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.

In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above present 
fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of Primary Bank 
at December 31, 1996, and the results of its operations and its 
cash flows for each of the years in the two-year period ended December 
31, 1996, in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles.



                                            /s/ KPMG Peat Marwick LLP


Boston, Massachusetts
January 23, 1997
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

DAY ELEV

 410.91

 410.78

 410.57

 410.52

 410.36

 410.16

 410.13

 410.20

 410.75

 410.83

 411.15

 411.38

 411.47

 411.54

 411.60

 411.59

 411.43

 411.33

 411.33

 411.12

 411.01

 410.87

 410.81

 410.48

 410.32

 410.29

 410.17

 409.98

 409.73

 409.55

 456.6

 455.7

 454.1

 453.7

 452.5

 451.0

 450.8

 451.3

 455.4

 456.0

 458.4

 460.2

 460.8

 461.4

 461.8

 461.8

 460.5

 459.8

 459.8

 458.2

 457.4

 456.3

 455.9

 453.4

 452.2

 452.0

 451.1

 449.7

 447.8

 446.5

STORAGE

-0.1

-1.0

-1.6

-0.4

-1.2

-1.5

-0.2

+0.5

+4.1

+0.6

+2.4

+1.7

+0.7

+0.5

+0.5

-0.1

-1.2

-0.8

+0.0

-1.6

-0.8

-1.0

-0.4

-2.5

-1.2

-0.2

-0.9

-1.4

-1.9

-1.3

CHANGE

1,691

1,137

913

1,564

1,195

998

1,638

1,981

3,765

1,938

2,774

2,449

1,935

1,903

2,059

1,729

1,093

1,215

1,509

1,155

1,389

1,262

1,251

1,156

1,431

2,029

1,621

1,273

930

1,286

INFLOW

 1,058

 925

 1,002

 1,068

 1,094

 1,055

 1,091

 1,048

 1,003

 977

 928

 928

 956

 1,006

 1,194

 1,124

 1,056

 939

 1,063

 1,839

 1,687

 1,671

 1,353

 2,285

 1,920

 2,012

 1,948

 1,862

 1,746

 1,837

POWER

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

SPILL

 527

 527

 527

 527

 527

 527

 526

 526

 527

 527

 527

 528

 528

 528

 528

 528

 528

 528

 331

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

OUTLET

 143

 138

 141

 140

 142

 145

 104

 98

 92

 93

 98

 99

 93

 87

 88

 100

 106

 109

 102

 103

 106

 107

 106

 106

 106

 107

 112

 110

 107

 106

PUMPING

 38

 38

 35

 18

 35

 25

 30

 45

 68

 40

 8

 18

 15

 15

 20

 15

 13

 20

 13

 13

 15

 13

 18

 10

 8

 23

 13

 17

 10

 15

C.F.S.

 .15

 .15

 .14

 .07

 .14

 .10

 .12

 .18

 .27

 .16

 .03

 .07

 .06

 .06

 .08

 .06

 .05

 .08

 .05

 .05

 .06

 .05

 .07

 .04

 .03

 .09

 .05

 .07

 .04

 .06

INCHES

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .19

 1.27

 .38

 .16

 .06

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

PRECIP

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

NOVEMBER 2002 FOLSOM LAKE DAILY OPERATIONS RUN DATE: December 19, 2002

IN LAKE

EVAPORATION

INCHES

C.F.S. PLANT

COMPUTED*

1000 ACRE-FEET

RELEASE - C.F.S. 

 RIVER 

TOTALS -10.3 48,269 39,675 0 9,822 3,294 664 2.63 2.06

ACRE-FEET -10,300 95,742 78,695 0 19,482 6,534 1,317

COMMENTS:

* COMPUTED INFLOW IS THE SUM OF CHANGE IN STORAGE, RELEASES, PUMPING AND EVAPORATION.

SUMMARY

RELEASE (ACRE-FEET)

POWER 78,695

SPILL

PUMPING PLANT

 0

 6,534

TOTAL 104,711

PRECIPITATION

THIS MONTH =

JULY 1, 2002 TO DATE = 2.06

 456.8

OUTLET 19,482 2.06

Table 11
(No. 6490

#### Zion Nursing Home, Inc., Claimant, *vs.*State of Illinois, Department of Mental Health, Respondent.

*Opinion filed July 27, 1972.*

Zion Nursing Home, Inc., Claimant, pro se.

William J. Scott, Attorney General; Saul R. Wexler, Assistant Attorney General, for Respondent.

Perlin, C.J.
Exhibit 5(a)(ii)
 John Hancock Financial Services
    
    (LOGO)
 abergman@jhancock.com




---



##### 



John Hancock Financial Services
    
    (LOGO)
 Manulife Financial Corporation
June 27, 2011
Page 2
      /s/ Arnold R. Bergman

Arnold R. BergmanChief Counsel  Variable Annuities
### §790. Repealed. Pub. L. 91–346, §5(d)(3)(B), July 20, 1970, 84 Stat. 445

Section, Pub. L. 88–579, §11, Sept. 3, 1964, 78 Stat. 907, provided that this chapter would not invalidate any act of Congress or Executive order vesting authority in the Commission of Fine Arts or any other Federal advisory body nor would this chapter authorize the National Council on the Arts to undertake any duty or responsibility which belongs to any other Federal advisory body established as of Sept. 3, 1964.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date of Repeal

Repeal effective July 1, 1970, see section 5(d)(3)(B) of Pub. L. 91–346.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
COMPANY'S CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET AS OF JUNE 26, 1998 AND ITS
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS FOR THE FIRST FISCAL QUARTER
ENDED JUNE 26, 1998 FILED AUGUST 10, 1998 ON FORM 10-Q.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-25-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             MAR-28-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-26-1998
<CASH>                                          21,958
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  252,398
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               308,829
<PP&E>                                          96,771
<DEPRECIATION>                                  49,018
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 834,157
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          200,799
<BONDS>                                        369,209
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                      6,567
<COMMON>                                           226
<OTHER-SE>                                     221,818
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   834,157
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               225,188
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  198,130
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                24,971
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               8,902
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (20,504)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   (1,213)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (19,291)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (19,291)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (1.76)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (1.76)
        

</TABLE>
te()': s-?9. Sc,~L ~0-e 

, .... ' 

Essential Air Service at 

BEFORE THE 

.DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 

WASHINGTON, D.C. 

) 

) 

) 

MERIDIAN, MISSISSIPPI ) OST•2008-0112 .......... ·,.· )' 

Under 49 U.S.C. §41731 et seq. ) 

SILVER AIRWAYS PROPOSAL TO PROVIDE SUBSIDIZED AIR SERVICE 

AT MERIDIAN, MISSISSIPPI- SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION. <tt;~·f.•. 

Correspondence with regard to this document should be addressed to: 

Mickey Bowman 

Vice President Essential Air Service 

Silver Airways 

1100 Lee Wagener Blvd, Suite 201 

Ft. Lauderdale, FL 33315 

Telephone: 954-302-5929 

Fax: 270-689-2180 

E-Mail: mbowman@gosilver.com 

In response to concerns raised by the community of Meridian; MS relating to Silver Airways proposal to provide 

Essential Air Service, Silver Airways offers the following alternate service pattern.· Studying the travel patterns of 

the community and best use of Silver Airways resources, this alternativ.e service pattern w.ould seem the best 

compromise. It should be understood that this is a draft schedule and may not be representative of the final 

published schedule. 

S~HEDULE 

3MIAD812 MARKET PAGE 

(LOCAL) SUMMARY l 

10/01/12- 99199199 

FROM TO DEP ARR FLT EQP FREQ STP 

STA STA TIME TIME NUM 

MEl ATL 600 825 3610 SF3 X7 0 

MEl ATL 900 1125 3614 SF3 7 Only 0 

MEl ATL 1330 1555 3611 SF3 X6 0 

ATL MEl 1230 1305 3611 SF3 X6 0 

ATL MEl 1715 1750 3614 SF3 60nly 0 

ATL MEl 2100 2135 3612 SF3 X6 0
§ 10.6 What special statutory definitions apply to dependents and survivors? ( a ) 5 U.S.C. 8133 provides that certain benefits are payable to certain enumerated survivors of employees who have died from an injury sustained in the performance of duty.
( b ) 5 U.S.C. 8148 also provides that certain other benefits may be payable to certain family members of employees who have been incarcerated due to a felony conviction.
( c ) 5 U.S.C. 8110(b) further provides that any employee who is found to be eligible for a basic benefit shall be entitled to have such basic benefit augmented at a specified rate for certain persons who live in the beneficiary's household or who are dependent upon the beneficiary for support.
( d ) 5 U.S.C. 8101, 8110, 8133, and 8148, which define the nature of such survivorship or dependency necessary to qualify a beneficiary for a survivor's benefit or an augmented benefit, apply to the provisions of this part but not to the death gratuity provided under subpart J.
( e ) 5 U.S.C. 8102a provides the definitions for survivorship or dependency necessary to qualify as a beneficiary for a death gratuity benefit as well as allowing half the death gratuity benefit to be paid to alternate beneficiary.
### §882. Repealed. Pub. L. 91–230, title IV, §401(h)(3), Apr. 13, 1970, 84 Stat. 174

Section, Pub. L. 89–10, title VIII, §802, formerly title VI, §602, Apr. 11, 1965, 79 Stat. 57, renumbered title VII, §702, Pub. L. 89–750, title I, §161, Nov. 3, 1966, 80 Stat. 1204, renumbered title VIII, §802, Pub. L. 90–247, title VII, §702, Jan. 2, 1968, 81 Stat. 816, provided for appointment of advisory council and for compensation ($100 per day limitation, including travel time) and travel expenses of the members.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 16-6201

WILLIE MARVIN GREEN,

Petitioner – Appellant,

v.

ROBERT M. STEVENSON, III, Warden,

Respondent - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of 

South Carolina, at Rock Hill. Bruce H. Hendricks, District 

Judge. (0:14-cv-04407-BHH)

Submitted: August 3, 2016 Decided: August 16, 2016

Before SHEDD, DUNCAN, and FLOYD, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Willie Marvin Green, Appellant Pro Se. William Edgar Salter, 

III, Assistant Attorney General, Donald John Zelenka, Senior 

Assistant Attorney General, Columbia, South Carolina, for 

Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Willie Marvin Green seeks to appeal the district court’s 

order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and 

denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (2012) petition. The 

order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues 

a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1)(A)

(2012). A certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a 

substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 

28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2012). When the district court denies

relief on the merits, a prisoner satisfies this standard by 

demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that the 

district court’s assessment of the constitutional claims is 

debatable or wrong. Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 484 

(2000); see Miller-El v. Cockrell, 537 U.S. 322, 336-38 (2003). 

When the district court denies relief on procedural grounds, the 

prisoner must demonstrate both that the dispositive procedural 

ruling is debatable, and that the petition states a debatable 

claim of the denial of a constitutional right. Slack, 529 U.S. 

at 484-85. 

We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that 

Green has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny 

a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. We 

dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal 
3

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before 

this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 9
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FORM THE MARCH
31, 1997 FORM 10-Q OF HILLS BANCORPORATION AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY
REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1997
<CASH>                                          12,250
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                               0
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                   207
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                    114,558
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                          23,256
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                            23,348
<LOANS>                                        390,167
<ALLOWANCE>                                      7,296
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 555,623
<DEPOSITS>                                     448,926
<SHORT-TERM>                                    17,977
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                              4,277
<LONG-TERM>                                     30,765
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         8,990
<OTHER-SE>                                      38,112
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>                 555,623
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                  8,041
<INTEREST-INVEST>                                1,967
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                    41
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                                10,049
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                               4,603
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               5,222
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                            4,827
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                      195
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                   0
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                  3,460
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  2,297
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                       1,611
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     1,611
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     1.09
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.09
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                       0
<LOANS-NON>                                        376
<LOANS-PAST>                                       929
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                     0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                  6,435
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                 7,311
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                      210
<RECOVERIES>                                         0
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                                7,296
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                             7,296
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                              0
        

</TABLE>
### **CHAPTER 14—ALCOHOL AND DRUG ABUSE EDUCATIONAL PROGRAMS AND ACTIVITIES**
§ 10.401 When and how is compensation for total disability paid? ( a ) Compensation is payable when an employee starts to lose pay if the injury causes permanent disability or if pay loss continues for more than 14 calendar days. Otherwise, compensation is payable on the fourth day after pay stops pursuant to 5 U.S.C. 8117(a). Compensation may not be paid while an injured employee is in a continuation of pay status or receives pay for leave or, for Postal Service employees, for the first three days of temporary disability as described in 5 U.S.C. 8117(b) and § 10.200(c), except for medical or vocational rehabilitation benefits.
( b ) Compensation for total disability is payable at the rate of 662 ⁄ 3 percent of the pay rate if the employee has no dependents, or 75 percent of the pay rate if the employee has at least one dependent. (“Dependents” are defined at 5 U.S.C. 8110(a).)