alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
CERTIFICATION   31.2



I, Elaine K. Roberts



1.

I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of Oppenheimer Holdings Inc.;

2.

Based on my knowledge, this annual report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this annual report;

3.

Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this annual report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this annual report;

4.

The registrants other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and we have:

5.

a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this annual report is being prepared;

b) designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles;

c) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures; and presented in this annual report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures as of the end of the period covered by the annual report based on such evaluation

d) disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control over financial reporting; and

6.

The registrants other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):

(a) significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial data; and

b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial reporting



/s/ E.K. Roberts

Name: Elaine K. Roberts

Title: Chief Financial Officer



March 7, 2007
###### Editorial Note on Part 40

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 40 appear by T.D. ATF-460, 66 FR 39094-39096, July 27, 2001; T.D. ATF-464, 66 FR 43479, Aug. 20, 2001; and T.D. TTB-91, 76 FR 5479, Feb. 1, 2011.

#### § 40.185 Retention of records.

All records required to be kept under this part, including copies of authorizations, claims, inventories, notices, reports, returns and schedules, shall be retained by the manufacturer for three years following the close of the calendar year in which filed or made, or in the case of an authorization, for three years following the close of the calendar year in which the operation under such authorization is concluded. Such records shall be kept in the factory or a place convenient thereto, and shall be made available for inspection by any appropriate TTB officer upon his request.

(72 Stat. 1423; 26 U.S.C. 5741)
(No. 74-CC-342

#### Computer Machinery Corporation, Claimant, *vs.*State of Illinois, Secretary of State, Respondent.

*Opinion filed April 2, 1974.*

Computer Machinery Corporation, Claimant, pro se.

*318William J. Scott, Attorney General; Howard W. Feldman, Assistant Attorney General, for Respondent.

Per Curiam.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY ELEV

 545.60

 547.25

 548.57

 550.01

 551.10

 551.93

 552.54

 552.85

 553.35

 553.89

 554.64

 555.54

 556.11

 556.79

 557.40

 558.07

 558.57

 558.51

 558.66

 558.68

 558.87

 558.95

 558.93

 558.96

 559.03

 558.42

 558.24

 558.58

 558.87

 559.10

 559.26

 375.3

 382.0

 387.5

 393.5

 398.0

 401.5

 404.1

 405.4

 407.6

 409.9

 413.1

 417.0

 419.4

 422.4

 425.0

 428.0

 430.2

 429.9

 430.6

 430.7

 431.5

 431.8

 431.8

 431.9

 432.2

 429.5

 428.7

 430.2

 431.5

 432.5

 433.2

STORAGE

+5.2

+6.7

+5.4

+6.0

+4.6

+3.5

+2.6

+1.3

+2.1

+2.3

+3.2

+3.9

+2.5

+3.0

+2.7

+2.9

+2.2

-0.3

+0.7

+0.1

+0.8

+0.4

-0.1

+0.1

+0.3

-2.7

-0.8

+1.5

+1.3

+1.0

+0.7

CHANGE

3,944

4,568

4,083

4,343

3,632

3,141

2,877

2,417

2,872

2,962

3,406

3,678

2,949

3,273

3,215

3,414

3,063

2,080

2,628

2,442

2,952

2,792

2,623

2,727

2,732

1,066

1,771

2,758

2,666

2,690

2,549

INFLOW

 285

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 354

 502

 502

 576

 655

 710

 768

 806

 852

 808

 832

 874

 912

 884

MADERA

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

SPILL

 285

 288

 290

 292

 295

 333

 470

 611

 651

 651

 629

 567

 545

 635

 730

 778

 797

 714

 655

 742

 804

 804

 801

 740

 639

 539

 528

 599

 739

 862

 904

FRIANT-KERN

 38

 28

 44

 26

 31

 38

 51

 44

 48

 47

 51

 50

 53

 41

 34

 55

 55

 43

 37

 53

 50

 54

 54

 50

 29

 26

 35

 44

 54

 54

 54

C.F.S.

 .29

 .21

 .33

 .19

 .23

 .28

 .37

 .32

 .35

 .34

 .37

 .36

 .38

 .29

 .24

 .39

 .39

 .30

 .26

 .37

 .35

 .38

 .38

 .35

 .20

 .18

 .25

 .31

 .38

 .38

 .38

INCHES

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .02

 .01

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

PRECIP

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

MAY 2012 MILLERTON LAKE DAILY OPERATIONS RUN DATE: June 1, 2012

IN LAKE

EVAPORATION

INCHES

C.F.S.

COMPUTED*

1000 ACRE-FEET

RELEASE - C.F.S. 

TOTALS +63.1 92,313 10,320 18,917 0 1,371 9.80 .03

ACRE-FEET +63,127 183,103 20,470 37,522 0 2,719

COMMENTS:

* COMPUTED INFLOW IS THE SUM OF CHANGE IN STORAGE, RELEASES, PUMPING AND EVAPORATION.

SUMMARY

RELEASE (ACRE-FEET)

CANALS

FRIANT-KERN

MADERA

 37,522

 20,470 117,253

PRECIPITATION

THIS MONTH =

JULY 1, 2011 TO DATE = 10.51

 370.1

 59,261 0.03

CANALS

AT FRIANT

TOTAL RELEASES

OUTLET

 704

 852

 1,002

 1,004

 1,007

 1,008

 1,054

 1,100

 1,101

 1,103

 1,105

 1,107

 1,109

 1,108

 1,109

 1,103

 1,102

 1,102

 1,101

 1,101

 1,101

 1,102

 1,102

 1,102

 1,102

 1,002

 799

 529

 356

 350

 350

RIVER

 29,877

 59,261

RIVER
### §69. Anthropological researches; cooperation of Institution with States, educational institutions, or scientific organizations

The Secretary of the Smithsonian Institution is hereby authorized to cooperate with any State, educational institution, or scientific organization in the United States to continue independently or in cooperation anthropological researches among the American Indians and the natives of lands under the jurisdiction or protection of the United States and the excavation and preservation of archaeological remains.

(Apr. 10, 1928, ch. 335, §1, 45 Stat. 413; Aug. 22, 1949, ch. 494, §1, 63 Stat. 623.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

1949—Act Aug. 22, 1949, substituted "to continue independently or in cooperation anthropological" for "for continuing ethnological" and inserted "and the natives of lands under the jurisdiction or protection of the United States".
# ........ __________________ te()': s-

# ?9.

# Sc,~L**~0-e**

,

## .... '

Essential Air Service at 

## BEFORE THE .DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION WASHINGTON, D.C. ) ) ) 

## MERIDIAN, MISSISSIPPI ) OST•2008-0112

.......... ·,.· 

### )' 

### Under 49 U.S.C. §41731 etseq. ) 

## SILVERAIRWAYS PROPOSAL TO PROVIDE SUBSIDIZED AIR SERVICE AT MERIDIAN, MISSISSIPPI- SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION.**<tt;~·f.•.** Correspondence with regard to thisdocument should be addressed to: Mickey Bowman VicePresidentEssential Air Service Silver Airways 1100 Lee Wagener Blvd, Suite 201 Ft. Lauderdale, FL 33315 Telephone: 954-302-5929 Fax: 270-689-2180 E-Mail: mbowman@gosilver.com Inresponse to concerns raised by the community ofMeridian; MS relating to Silver Airways proposal to provide Essential Air Service, Silver Airways offers the following alternate service pattern.· Studying the travel patterns of the community and best use ofSilver Airways resources, this alternativ.e servicepattern w.ould seem the best compromise. Itshould be understood that this isa draft schedule and may not be representative ofthe final published schedule.**S~HEDULE**

3MIAD812 MARKET PAGE (LOCAL) SUMMARY l 10/01/12- 99199199 FROM TO DEP ARR FLT EQP FREQ STP STA STA TIME 

### TIME NUM 

### MEl ATL 600 825 3610 SF3 X7 0 

### MEl ATL 900 1125 3614 SF3 7 Only 0 

### MEl ATL 1330 1555 3611 SF3 X6 0 ATL 

### MEl 1230 1305 3611 SF3 X6 0 ATL 

### MEl 1715 1750 3614 SF3 60nly 0 ATL 

### MEl 2100 2135 3612 SF3 X6 0

____ ___;, __ ....;...._......, ... J
...

" ----- -
|  |  | [if !vml]>[endif]>

You have  reached the Federal Depository Library Program Electronic Collection  (FDLP/EC) Archive. This archive assures ongoing access to publications in the  FDLP/EC. Access to publications in the archive is available through GPO's  suite of cataloging and locator services, including the Catalog of U.S.  Government Publications (CGP).
Title: National      compensation survey. Cincinnati-Middletown-Wilmington, OH-KY-IN
 
 
SuDocs Number: [if !vml]>[endif]> L 2.121/35:C 49/
Item    Number: [if !vml]>[endif]> 0768-B-35 (online)
System    Number: 000866396
 
 
 
2008
 
2009
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
A service of the Superintendent of Documents,  U.S. Government Printing Office..

 

Last updated:  April 23, 2020  Page Name:  http://permanent.access.gpo.gov/
perm |
|--|--|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
§ 1002.307 What is the proper venue in an action against a State or private employer? ( a ) If an action is brought by the Attorney General against a State, the action may proceed in the United States district court for any district in which the State exercises any authority or carries out any function.
( b ) If an action is brought against a private employer, or a political subdivision of a State, the action may proceed in the United States district court for any district in which the employer maintains a place of business.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY ELEV

 220.84

 222.10

 222.09

 222.79

 222.62

 222.00

 221.48

 220.48

 221.44

 220.35

 219.88

 219.78

 221.20

 220.33

 221.86

 224.45

 222.11

 221.66

 220.78

 221.02

 221.73

 220.89

 220.55

 221.00

 221.22

 221.35

 222.62

 222.88

 222.93

 221.27

 221.77

 45,341

 48,650

 48,624

 50,486

 50,033

 48,385

 47,020

 44,400

 46,915

 44,062

 42,841

 42,583

 46,285

 44,009

 48,019

 54,941

 48,677

 47,493

 45,184

 45,813

 47,677

 45,472

 44,583

 45,760

 46,338

 46,679

 50,033

 50,726

 50,859

 46,469

 47,782

STORAGE

-105

+3,309

-26

+1,862

-453

-1,648

-1,365

-2,620

+2,515

-2,853

-1,221

-258

+3,702

-2,276

+4,010

+6,922

-6,264

-1,184

-2,309

+629

+1,864

-2,205

-889

+1,177

+578

+341

+3,354

+693

+133

-4,390

+1,313

CHANGE

3,061

3,149

3,375

3,235

3,112

3,154

3,157

2,774

2,431

2,192

2,251

2,010

1,572

1,377

1,895

2,192

1,622

1,222

1,193

1,097

882

1,009

909

775

1,011

902

917

1,076

1,176

1,370

1,346

PUMPING

 8,221

 7,037

 7,589

 8,106

 8,597

 9,016

 8,828

 9,292

 7,368

 8,467

 10,095

 10,268

 9,719

 9,300

 9,022

 7,580

 8,564

 9,609

 9,655

 9,959

 9,488

 8,953

 7,930

 9,170

 9,880

 10,018

 9,842

 9,870

 9,654

 8,370

 9,130

PUMPING

 1,730

 1,881

 2,900

 1,740

 1,740

 0

 0

 0

 2,041

 2,389

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 2,954

 292

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 1,795

 671

PUMPING

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 74

 310

 234

 237

 239

 240

 238

 247

GEN.

*

-240

+57

-76

-70

-198

-352

-307

-437

+103

-248

-190

+141

-132

-457

+129

+66

-440

-116

-473

-442

-355

-315

-480

-161

-70

-237

-34

-164

-458

-378

+515

OR

UNITED STATES 

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION

CONSOLIDATED STATE-FEDERAL O'NEILL FOREBAY October 6, 2017

DAILY OPERATIONS

JULY 2017 RUN DATE:

IN LAKE GEN.

ACRE-FEET O'NEILL

RELEASE - C.F.S. 

TOTALS +2,336 57,444 1,819 20,133 278,597 -5,819

ACRE-FEET +2,336 113,940 3,608 39,934 552,597

SUMMARY

 895

RELEASE (ACRE-FEET)

O'NEILL GEN. 3,608

SAN LUIS PUMP 39,934 895

 45,446

DOS AMIGOS PUMP 552,597

DELIVERIES 

S. LUIS O'NEILL

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 2,794

 5,209

 4,614

 0

 0

 0

 697

 2,622

 0

 1,743

 1,734

 0

 1,716

 875

 2,443

 2,604

 0

 0

 2,329

 2,768

 2,773

 3,678

 2,743

 2,050

 0

 1,717

 45,109

 89,474

CALIF. DOS AMIGOS

AQUEDUCT

7,077

7,379

7,177

7,620

7,195

2,590

81

1,020

8,142

7,474

7,418

7,290

7,523

7,232

7,278

7,078

7,178

6,483

6,895

7,178

7,297

7,147

7,053

6,895

6,771

6,986

7,208

6,804

7,192

7,198

7,583

 205,442

 407,494

S. LUIS

DELIV.

GAINS(+)

LOSS(-)

C.F.S.

INFLOW - C.F.S.

STATE OF CALIFORNIA

THE RESOURCES AGENCY

DEPARTMENT OF WATER RESOURCES

STATE WATER PROJECT

TOTAL 597,034

-11,542

* DAILY DEL. FIGURES UNAVAILABLE. TOT. DEL. IS INCLUDED IN COMPUTING MONTHLY TOTALS 

Table 18
### §§541, 542. Omitted

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

This subchapter has not been funded since the fiscal year ending in 1968.

Section 541, Pub. L. 85–864, title VII, §701, Sept. 2, 1958, 72 Stat. 1595; Pub. L. 88–210, title II, §207(a), formerly §27(a), Dec. 18, 1963, 77 Stat. 419, renumbered Pub. L. 90–576, title I, §101(a)(1), Oct. 16, 1968, 82 Stat. 1064; Pub. L. 96–88, title III, §301(a)(1), title V, §507, Oct. 17, 1979, 93 Stat. 677, 692, directed Secretary of Education, in cooperation with Advisory Committee on New Educational Media, to conduct, assist, and foster research and experimentation in development and evaluation of projects involving communication media of possible value to State or local educational agencies.

Section 542, Pub. L. 85–864, title VII, §702, Sept. 2, 1958, 72 Stat. 1595; Pub. L. 96–88, title III, §301(a)(1), title V, §507, Oct. 17, 1979, 93 Stat. 677, 692, authorized Secretary to make grants-in-aid or contracts for projects of research or experimentation referred to in section 541 of this title.
[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 72 (Thursday, April 14, 2011)]
[Notices]
[Page 21072]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2011-9036]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

NATIONAL AERONAUTICS AND SPACE ADMINISTRATION

[Notice: (11-038)]


NASA Advisory Council; Education and Public Outreach Committee; 
Meeting

AGENCY: National Aeronautics and Space Administration.

ACTION: Notice of meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: In accordance with the Federal Advisory Committee Act, Public 
Law 92-463, as amended, the National Aeronautics and Space 
Administration announces a meeting of the Education and Public Outreach 
Committee of the NASA Advisory Council (NAC).

DATES: Friday, April 29, 2011, 8:30 a.m. to 5:30 p.m., Local Time.

ADDRESSES: From 8:30 to 9:45 a.m., the meeting will occur at the Edward 
Jones Dome located at 701 Convention Plaza in St. Louis, MO. From 10 
a.m.-12 noon, the meeting will be conducted at the Renaissance St. 
Louis Grand & Suites, 800 Washington Avenue, in St. Louis, MO, in the 
Benton Room. From 2-5:30 p.m., the meeting will take place at the 
Edward Jones Dome, 701 Convention Plaza, in St. Louis, MO.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: This meeting will also take place 
telephonically and via WebEx. Any interested person should contact Ms. 
Erika G. Vick, Executive Secretary for the Education and Public 
Outreach Committee, National Aeronautics and Space Administration, 
Washington, DC, at <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#1d586f74767c336b747e76302c5d737c6e7c337a726b"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="9dd8eff4f6fcb3ebf4fef6b0acddf3fceefcb3faf2eb">[email protected]</span></a>, no later than 4 p.m., local 
time, April 27, 2011, to get further information about participating 
via teleconference and/or WebEx.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The agenda for the meeting includes the 
following topics:

FIRST Robotics Championship Opening Ceremony,
FIRST Robotics from the NASA HQ Perspective,
FIRST Robotics from the NASA Center Perspective,
Leadership Forum,
Tour the FIRST Robotics Teams.

    The meeting will be open to the public up to the seating capacity 
of the room. It is imperative that the meeting be held on this date to 
accommodate the scheduling priorities of the key participants.

    Dated: April 8, 2011.
P. Diane Rausch,
Advisory Committee Management Officer, National Aeronautics and Space 
Administration.
[FR Doc. 2011-9036 Filed 4-13-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7510-13-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
#### § 72.37 Discontinuance of administrative proceedings.

If the petition is filed prior to administrative sale or retention for official use, proceedings to effect such sale or retention will be discontinued.
* Local Rule 47.5 provides: "The publication of opinions

that have no precedential value and merely decide particular

cases on the basis of well-settled principles of law imposes

needless expense on the public and burdens on the legal

profession." Pursuant to that Rule, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

__________________

No. 95-50803 

USDC No. SA-95-CA-973

__________________

ISIDOR MARTINEZ RAMIREZ,

 Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus

PETER SAKAI, Judge,

 Defendant-Appellee.

- - - - - - - - - -

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Western District of Texas

- - - - - - - - - -

December 18, 1995

Before WIENER, PARKER and DENNIS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Isidro Martinez Ramirez argues that the district court erred

by denying his motion to proceed in forma pauperis and

determining that his complaint lacked legal merit. Ramirez'

claim, that a state judge failed to call him to court for a

hearing concerning his parental rights, is barred by the doctrine

of absolute judicial immunity. Graves v. Hampton, 1 F.3d 315,

317 (5th Cir. 1993). We thus conclude that the appeal is
No. 95-50803

-2-

frivolous. See Howard v. King, 707 F.2d 215, 219-20 (5th Cir.

1983); 5th Cir. R. 42.2. 

We caution Ramirez that any additional frivolous appeals

filed by him will invite the imposition of sanctions. To avoid

sanctions, Ramirez is further cautioned to review any pending

appeals to ensure that they do not raise arguments that are

frivolous because they have been previously decided by this

court. 

APPEAL DISMISSED.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 09-7051

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee,

v. ROBERT SAWYER, Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Richmond. Richard L. Williams, Senior District Judge. (3:07-cr-00175-RLW-1; 3:08-cv-00597-RLW)

Submitted: January 13, 2010 Decided: January 27, 2010

Before WILKINSON, MICHAEL, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Robert Sawyer, Appellant Pro Se. Angela Mastandrea-Miller, Assistant United States Attorney, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM: Robert Sawyer seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West Supp. 2009) motion. The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1) (2006). A certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2006). A prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that any assessment of the constitutional claims by the district court is debatable or wrong and that any dispositive procedural ruling by the district

court is likewise debatable. Miller-El v. Cockrell , 537 U.S. 322, 336-38 (2003); Slack v. McDaniel , 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000);

Rose v. Lee , 252 F.3d 676, 683-84 (4th Cir. 2001). We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Sawyer has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED