alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JAN-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             FEB-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               JAN-01-1999
<CASH>                                          66,394
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                    195,000
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               384,707
<PP&E>                                          70,177
<DEPRECIATION>                                  45,400
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 539,315
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        1,070,751
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        17,996
<OTHER-SE>                                   (810,432)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   539,315
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                           (2,119,467)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              53,110
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (2,172,577)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (2,172,577)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.17)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY ELEV

 224.38

 223.94

 223.99

 222.46

 223.81

 224.29

 224.11

 223.14

 221.30

 221.04

 220.98

 220.85

 219.88

 218.87

 219.22

 220.09

 221.87

 223.25

 224.24

 223.25

 222.97

 222.09

 220.95

 219.76

 218.37

 218.66

 218.88

 218.93

 219.54

 221.48

 222.67

 54,752

 53,565

 53,700

 49,607

 53,216

 54,508

 54,023

 51,420

 46,547

 45,865

 45,708

 45,368

 42,841

 40,255

 41,145

 43,386

 48,045

 51,714

 54,374

 51,714

 50,966

 48,624

 45,629

 42,531

 38,995

 39,724

 40,280

 40,407

 41,964

 47,020

 50,166

STORAGE

-135

-1,187

+135

-4,093

+3,609

+1,292

-485

-2,603

-4,873

-682

-157

-340

-2,527

-2,586

+890

+2,241

+4,659

+3,669

+2,660

-2,660

-748

-2,342

-2,995

-3,098

-3,536

+729

+556

+127

+1,557

+5,056

+3,146

CHANGE

624

494

214

156

178

57

0

0

408

821

826

951

1,057

1,277

1,343

1,486

2,461

3,007

3,002

3,014

2,782

2,726

2,380

2,260

2,417

2,384

2,272

1,371

674

697

702

PUMPING

 2,743

 1,900

 1,615

 1,406

 1,514

 1,388

 1,882

 1,930

 2,175

 1,688

 692

 1,832

 2,220

 2,719

 2,834

 2,378

 2,065

 1,839

 1,385

 1,467

 1,427

 1,207

 1,562

 1,438

 1,499

 405

 927

 1,015

 1,245

 1,272

 2,092

PUMPING

 0

 0

 164

 2,320

 0

 0

 0

 765

 1,499

 0

 1,428

 373

 482

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 2,162

 4,227

 4,928

 3,791

 3,407

 3,344

 3,258

 1,890

 1,890

 1,890

 1,890

 1,900

 1,915

PUMPING

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

GEN.

*

-285

-1,040

+462

-251

-375

-2

-115

+189

-256

-218

+102

+111

+72

-111

-222

-144

-26

+111

+5

+48

+118

-44

+47

+151

+188

-53

+49

+34

-130

-217

+262

OR

UNITED STATES 

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION

CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT

CONSOLIDATED STATE-FEDERAL O'NEILL FOREBAY May 31, 2012

DAILY OPERATIONS

MARCH 2012 RUN DATE:

IN LAKE GEN.

ACRE-FEET O'NEILL

RELEASE - C.F.S. 

TOTALS -4,721 42,041 0 43,523 51,761 -1,540

ACRE-FEET -4,721 83,388 0 86,328 102,668

SUMMARY

 597

RELEASE (ACRE-FEET)

O'NEILL GEN. 0

SAN LUIS PUMP 86,328 597

 54,887

DOS AMIGOS PUMP 102,668

DELIVERIES 

S. LUIS O'NEILL

 1,741

 498

 0

 583

 2,516

 601

 414

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 2,010

 2,010

 1,751

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 12,124

 24,048

CALIF. DOS AMIGOS

AQUEDUCT

595

1,349

1,171

1,175

1,014

1,383

1,339

1,194

1,065

741

1,112

971

299

250

152

156

227

571

1,883

1,292

3,076

1,135

1,033

809

369

333

776

1,564

3,377

5,242

4,930

 40,583

 80,496

S. LUIS

DELIV.

GAINS(+)

LOSS(-)

C.F.S.

INFLOW - C.F.S.

STATE OF CALIFORNIA

THE RESOURCES AGENCY

DEPARTMENT OF WATER RESOURCES

STATE WATER PROJECT

TOTAL 189,593

-3,055

* DAILY DEL. FIGURES UNAVAILABLE. TOT. DEL. IS INCLUDED IN COMPUTING MONTHLY TOTALS 

Table 18
### §401. Omitted

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

The programs provided for in this chapter have not been funded for a number of years. See Codification notes set out under sections 421, 441, 451, 461, 481, 541, and 591 of this title.

Section, Pub. L. 85–864, title I, §101, Sept. 2, 1958, 72 Stat. 1581; Pub. L. 88–665, title I, §101, Oct. 16, 1964, 78 Stat. 1100, provided findings and declaration of policy for National Defense Education Act of 1958.
### Faulk, Scott (OST) From: 

### Sent: To: 

### Subject: Aloha, Kalanihuia, Janice <jkalanihuia@queens.org> Friday, November 22, 2013 6:37 PM EAS (OST) Kalaupapa EAS

I am writingto support Mokulele Airlines 4-year bid to link Kalaupapa to Kahului, Honolulu, Kapalua and**~** ' :**~** . " Lt ·.,)

Ho'olehua. Mokulele has systematically increased service to Molokai in response to community need, keeping customer service atthe highest levels. They are committed to safe interisland travel and to ourcommunity. We've seen many changes and challenges in inter-island airtravel overthe past several years, but Mokulele has remained steadfast, and committed to rural communities. I respectfully ask thatyou lookfavorably upon their bid. Sincerely, Janice Kalanihuia

1
Exhibit 32
 
 
 SECTION 1350 CERTIFICATION
 
 Each of the undersigned, S.W. Yong, President and Chief Executive Officer of Trio-Tech International, a California corporation (the “Company”), and Victor H.M. Ting, Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, do hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of his knowledge (1) the quarterly report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the six months ended December 31, 2010, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and (2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
  
 /s/ S. W. Yong
 Name: S. W. Yong
 Title:President and Chief Executive Officer
 Dated: February 18, 2011
  
 /s/  Victor H.M. Ting
 Name:Victor H.M. Ting
 Title:Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
 Dated: February 18, 2011
 
 
 A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
###### Editorial Note on Part 44

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 44 appear by T.D. ATF-464, 66 FR 43480, Aug. 20, 2001, and T.D. ATF-480, 67 FR 30801-30803, May 8, 2002.

#### § 44.199 Disposition.

After actual removal from his factory or export warehouse of the shipment described on the notice of removal, Form 5200.14, the manufacturer or export warehouse proprietor shall, except where the shipment is to be exported by parcel post, promptly forward one copy of the notice of removal to the appropriate TTB officer. A copy of each such notice shall be retained by the manufacturer or export warehouse proprietor as a part of his records, for 3 years following the close of the calendar year in which the shipment was removed and shall be made available for inspection by any appropriate TTB officer upon his request. The manufacturer or export warehouse proprietor shall dispose of the other copies of each notice of removal as required by this subpart.

(72 Stat. 1418; 26 U.S.C. 5704)

[25 FR 4722, May 28, 1960. Redesignated at 40 FR 16835, Apr. 15, 1975; T.D. ATF-421, 64 FR 71926, Dec. 22, 1999; T.D. ATF-480, 67 FR 30802, May 8, 2002]
#### § 771.136 Availability.

A copy of the record shall be available for inspection or copying by the parties to the proceedings during business hours at the office of the administrative law judge or the Director of Industry Operations or, pending administrative review, at the Office of the Director.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY ELEV

 518.40

 518.42

 518.42

 518.29

 518.17

 518.12

 518.12

 518.37

 518.62

 518.98

 519.37

 519.57

 519.61

 519.47

 519.53

 519.50

 519.72

 520.12

 520.46

 520.85

 520.98

 521.10

 521.04

 521.75

 522.03

 522.29

 522.65

 522.73

 522.81

 522.90

 522.81

 273.9

 274.0

 274.0

 273.5

 273.1

 273.0

 273.0

 273.8

 274.7

 275.9

 277.2

 277.9

 278.0

 277.6

 277.8

 277.7

 278.4

 279.8

 280.9

 282.3

 282.7

 283.2

 282.9

 285.4

 286.4

 287.3

 288.5

 288.8

 289.1

 289.4

 289.1

STORAGE

+0.1

+0.1

+0.0

-0.4

-0.4

-0.2

+0.0

+0.8

+0.9

+1.2

+1.3

+0.7

+0.1

-0.5

+0.2

-0.1

+0.8

+1.4

+1.2

+1.3

+0.4

+0.4

-0.2

+2.5

+1.0

+0.9

+1.3

+0.3

+0.3

+0.3

-0.3

CHANGE

350

491

510

297

303

421

519

867

802

987

966

489

349

133

475

321

757

1,067

867

815

501

588

280

1,624

716

593

770

419

502

626

310

INFLOW

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 110

 110

MADERA

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

SPILL

 122

 299

 351

 350

 350

 350

 350

 282

 234

 234

 98

 0

 138

 236

 236

 236

 236

 237

 139

 0

 129

 239

 239

 240

 85

 0

 0

 162

 243

 243

 243

FRIANT-KERN

 4

 3

 4

 15

 3

 2

 14

 14

 5

 2

 61

 10

 8

 4

 2

 2

 7

 4

 3

 3

 11

 3

 10

 7

 5

 14

 23

 3

 5

 2

 2

C.F.S.

 .04

 .03

 .04

 .14

 .03

 .02

 .13

 .13

 .05

 .02

 .55

 .09

 .07

 .04

 .02

 .02

 .06

 .04

 .03

 .03

 .10

 .03

 .09

 .06

 .04

 .12

 .20

 .03

 .04

 .02

 .02

INCHES

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .37

 .00

 1.45

 .12

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .76

 .33

 .50

 .00

 .00

 .01

 .00

 .00

 .00

PRECIP

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

JANUARY 2001 MILLERTON LAKE DAILY OPERATIONS RUN DATE: January 28, 2002

IN LAKE

EVAPORATION

INCHES

C.F.S.

COMPUTED*

1000 ACRE-FEET

RELEASE - C.F.S. 

TOTALS +15.3 18,715 220 6,301 0 255 2.33 3.54

ACRE-FEET +15,334 37,121 436 12,498 0 506

COMMENTS:

* COMPUTED INFLOW IS THE SUM OF CHANGE IN STORAGE, RELEASES, PUMPING AND EVAPORATION.

SUMMARY

RELEASE (ACRE-FEET)

CANALS

FRIANT-KERN

MADERA

 12,498

 436 21,275

PRECIPITATION

THIS MONTH =

JULY 1, 2000 TO DATE = 7.48

 273.8

 8,341 3.54

CANALS

AT FRIANT

TOTAL RELEASES

OUTLET

 155

 155

 155

 155

 155

 155

 155

 143

 134

 134

 134

 134

 134

 134

 134

 134

 134

 135

 135

 135

 136

 136

 136

 136

 136

 121

 113

 113

 113

 113

 113

RIVER

 4,205

 8,341

RIVER
#### Tony MALFATTI, Petitioner, v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, Respondent.

No. 05-72883.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted Feb. 13, 2006.*

Decided Feb. 22, 2006.

*787Tony Malfatti, Oakland, CA, pro se.

Donald L. Korb, Acting Chief Counsel Internal Revenue Service, John A. Nolet, Esq., Eileen J. O’Connor, Esq., U.S. Department of Justice Tax Division, Washington, DC, for Respondent.

Before: FERNANDEZ, RYMER, and BYBEE, Circuit Judges.

*

 The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. *See*Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

MEMORANDUM **

Tony Malfatti appeals pro se from the Tax Court’s decision, following a bench trial, in favor of the Commissioner of Internal Revenue (“Commissioner”) in Malfatti’s action contesting an unreported income determination and a penalty for the years 1998 through 2001. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 26 U.S.C. § 7482. We review de novo the Tax Court’s conclusions of law, *Hardy v. Commissioner,*181 F.3d 1002, 1004 (9th Cir.1999), and review for clear error its determination that a taxpayer received unreported income, *Weimerskirch v. Commissioner,*596 F.2d 358, 360 (9th Cir.1979). We review for abuse of discretion the imposition of sanctions. *Wolf v. Commissioner,*4 F.3d 709, 716 (9th Cir.1993). We affirm.

The Tax Court properly held that the Commissioner’s determination that Malfatti received unreported income was entitled to a presumption of correctness based on the income statements provided by his employers, their testimony at trial, and Malfatti’s own admission that he received income for performing various jobs. *See Hardy,*181 F.3d at 1004-05. Furthermore, Malfatti did not rebut this presumption with credible testimony or records showing an error in the amount of unreported income assessed. *See id.*(shifting to taxpayer the burden of showing that unreported income determination was erroneous after the Commissioner presents substantive evidence to establish it).

The Tax Court did not abuse its discretion by imposing a $15,000 penalty pursuant to section I.R.C. § 6673, where Malfatti failed to file tax returns and then repeatedly refused to participate in the judicial process or cooperate with trial counsel, objected to the admission of evidence regarding his income at trial, provided vague and uncorroborated testimony regarding his earnings, and asserted frivolous arguments such as claiming that the deficiency assessed was an excise tax. *See Wolf,*4 F.3d at 716.

Malfatti’s remaining contentions are unpersuasive.

AFFIRMED

**

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
Exhibit 10.2


 


AMENDMENT TO 


 


MAJESCO


 


2015 EQUITY INCENTIVE PLAN


 


(Effective as of August 13, 2018)


 


MAJESCO, a California corporation
(the “Company”) does hereby certify that:


 


First: The Majesco 2015 Equity
Incentive Plan (the “Plan”) was adopted by the Board of Directors of the Company on April 16, 2015 and by the shareholders
of the Company on June 19, 2015.


 


Second: Section
2.1 of the Plan is hereby amended and restated as follows:


 


2.1       Number
of Shares Available. Subject to Sections 2.5 and 20 and any other applicable provisions hereof, the total number of Shares
reserved and available for grant and issuance pursuant to this Plan as of the date of adoption of the Plan by the Board, is 5,877,263
Shares, which amount includes all Shares issuable pursuant to the stock options and restricted stock awards issued by Cover-All
Technologies Inc. under the Cover-All Technologies Inc. Amended and Restated 2005 Stock Incentive Plan (the “Prior
Plan”) that were assumed pursuant to the Merger Agreement dated December 14, 2014, as amended, between the Company
and Cover-All Technologies Inc.


 


Third: Section
2.4 of the Plan is hereby amended and restated as follows:


 


2.4.       Limitations.
No more than 5,877,263 Shares shall be issued pursuant to the exercise of ISOs.


 


Fourth: The foregoing amendment
was duly authorized by the Board of Directors of the Company and the vote of a majority of each class of outstanding stock of the
Corporation entitled to vote thereon.


 




    	 	-1-
§ 10.431 What does OWCP do when an overpayment is identified? Before seeking to recover an overpayment or adjust benefits, OWCP will advise the beneficiary in writing that: ( a ) The overpayment exists, and the amount of overpayment;
( b ) A preliminary finding shows either that the individual was or was not at fault in the creation of the overpayment;
( c ) He or she has the right to inspect and copy Government records relating to the overpayment; and
( d ) He or she has the right to present evidence which challenges the fact or amount of the overpayment, and/or challenges the preliminary finding that he or she was at fault in the creation of the overpayment. He or she may also request that recovery of the overpayment be waived.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

DAY HIGH

 3,087

 2,391

 2,206

 2,320

 2,427

 2,306

 2,052

 1,970

 1,205

 1,359

 1,860

 1,536

 1,647

 1,765

 1,951

 1,550

 1,920

 2,073

 1,578

 1,956

 2,008

 1,940

 1,420

 2,180

 1,846

 2,226

 2,272

 2,323

 2,149

 1,791

 336

 380

 361

 351

 323

 283

 336

 337

 305

 277

 357

 349

 331

 344

 333

 345

 359

 348

 353

 355

 368

 409

 422

 422

 391

 377

 388

 347

 346

 339

 873

 740

 714

 715

 588

 610

 541

 484

 439

 462

 551

 588

 563

 601

 593

 572

 626

 619

 550

 579

 590

 620

 635

 680

 647

 740

 729

 825

 714

 615

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

SEPTEMBER 2012 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: November 15, 2012

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

14 DAY

ACCUM

MEAN

14 DAY

AVG

MEAN

 9,816

 10,162

 10,508

 10,778

 10,907

 10,997

 10,973

 10,698

 10,281

 9,934

 9,677

 9,417

 9,060

 8,469

 8,189

 8,021

 7,933

 7,837

 7,799

 7,768

 7,817

 7,953

 8,149

 8,367

 8,463

 8,615

 8,781

 9,005

 9,126

 9,169

 701

 726

 751

 770

 779

 786

 784

 764

 734

 710

 691

 673

 647

 605

 585

 573

 567

 560

 557

 555

 558

 568

 582

 598

 605

 615

 627

 643

 652

 655

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

EMMATON TOP ON THE SACRAMENTO RIVER
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

DAY HIGH

 767

 756

 746

 760

 703

 648

 633

 558

 617

 559

 545

 592

 573

 661

 426

 423

 446

 626

 638

 443

 446

 437

 440

 448

 450

 450

 457

 453

 456

 451

 258

 261

 255

 254

 249

 246

 249

 259

 278

 287

 271

 246

 255

 258

 237

 378

 381

 398

 385

 401

 384

 343

 313

 417

 432

 412

 388

 422

 408

 393

 472

 447

 445

 471

 429

 414

 366

 344

 398

 392

 422

 357

 362

 382

 345

 400

 411

 459

 488

 426

 423

 404

 396

 431

 442

 430

 436

 438

 437

 424

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

APRIL 2004 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: May 19, 2004

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

DELTA MENDOTA CANAL AT CHECK 13 (O'NEILL)
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Kathy TORRES, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 06-40147

Conference Calendar.

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.

July 13, 2006.

*394James Lee Turner, Assistant U.S. Attorney, U.S. Attorney’s Office, Southern District of Texas, Houston, TX, for PlaintiffAppellee.

Timothy William Crooks, Assistant Federal Public Defender, Marjorie A. Meyers, Federal Public Defender, H. Michael Sokolow, Raquel Kathy Wilson, Assistant Federal Public Defender, Federal Public Defender’s Office, Southern District of Texas, Houston, TX, for Defendant-Appellant.

Before DAVIS, BARKSDALE, and DeMOSS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: *

Appealing the Judgment in a Criminal Case, Kathy Torres raises arguments that are foreclosed by *United States v. Slaughter,*238 F.3d 580, 582-84 (5th Cir.2000), which held that *Apprendi v. New Jersey,*530 U.S. 466, 120 S.Ct. 2348, 147 L.Ed.2d 435 (2000), did not render 21 U.S.C. § 841 unconstitutional on its face, and by *United States v. Riascos-Cuenu,*428 F.3d 1100, 1101-02 (5th Cir.2005), *petition for cert. filed*(Jan. 9, 2006) (No. 05-8662). which held that a challenge to the district court’s order requiring the defendant to cooperate in the collection of a DNA sample as a condition of supervised release is not ripe for review on direct appeal. The Government’s motion for summary affirmance is GRANTED.

JUDGMENT AFFIRMED; APPEAL DISMISSED IN PART.

*

 Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.
#### § 1001.131 Secretary's annual report to Congress.

The Secretary shall report, after the end of each program year, on the success of the Department and State agencies in carrying out the provisions of this part.

[49 FR 12919, Mar. 30, 1984. Redesignated at 54 FR 39353, Sept. 26, 1989, and amended at 54 FR 39354, Sept. 26, 1989]
### §65. Repealed. Pub. L. 89–674, §3, Oct. 15, 1966, 80 Stat. 953

Section, act July 7, 1884, ch. 332, 23 Stat. 214, required Director of National Museum to report annually to Congress on progress of the Museum during the year and its present condition. See section 65a of this title.
Exhibit 8.1
  Subsidiary*
    

Year of Incorporation
    

Jurisdiction of IncorporationHoshin GigaMedia Center, Inc.
    
    1998
    
    TaiwanGigaMedia Finance International Limited
    
    2000
    
    Cayman IslandsGigaMedia International Holdings Limited
    
    2004
    
    British Virgin IslandsCambridge Entertainment Software Limited
    
    2004
    
    British Virgin IslandsFunTown World Limited
    
    2005
    
    British Virgin IslandsGigaMedia Asia Limited
    
    2005
    
    British Virgin IslandsFunTown Hong Kong Limited
    
    1999
    
    Hong KongGigaMedia China Limited
    
    2005
    
    British Virgin IslandsCambridge Interactive Development Corporation
    
    1997
    
    U.S.A.Internet Media Licensing Limited
    
    2005
    
    British Virgin IslandsGigaMedia Europe Limited S.à.r.l.
    
    2010
    
    LuxembourgGigaMedia Asia Pacific Limited
    
    2006
    
    British Virgin IslandsGigaMedia Online Entertainment Corp.
    
    2009
    
    Cayman IslandsGigaMedia (HK) Limited
    
    2004
    
    Hong Kong
 
 *
    
    Includes significant subsidiaries of GigaMedia Limited only.