alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
In The 

Court of Appeals 

Seventh District of Texas at Amarillo 

 

No. 07-24-00152-CR 

 

ERIK MITCHELL RIVAS, APPELLANT 

V. 

THE STATE OF TEXAS, APPELLEE 

On Appeal from the 47th District Court 

Randall County, Texas 

Trial Court No. 32689A, Honorable Dee Johnson, Presiding 

August 21, 2024 

ORDER OF ABATEMENT AND REMAND 

Before PARKER and DOSS and YARBROUGH, JJ. 

Appellant, Erik Mitchell Rivas, appeals his conviction for capital murder1 and 

sentence to life in prison. The reporter’s record was originally due June 14, 2024, but we

granted the reporter two extensions to file the record due to her caseload. By letter of 

July 16, 2024, we admonished the reporter that failure to file the reporter’s record by 

August 14 could result in the appeal being abated and the cause remanded to the trial 

1 See TEX. PENAL CODE ANN. § 19.03(a)(2).
2

court for further proceedings without further notice. The reporter has since requested a 

third extension of thirty days to file the reporter’s record due to her continued caseload.

We deny the request for extension, abate the appeal, and remand the cause to the 

trial court for further proceedings. See TEX. R. APP. P. 35.3(c) (“The trial and appellate 

courts are jointly responsible for ensuring that the appellate record is timely filed.”); 

37.3(a)(2) (requiring appellate courts to “make whatever order is appropriate to avoid 

further delay and to preserve the parties’ rights” when the appellate record is not timely 

filed). On remand, the trial court shall determine the following:

(1) what tasks remain to complete the filing of the reporter’s record;

(2) why the reporter has not completed the necessary tasks;

(3) what amount of time is reasonably necessary for the completion of 

those tasks; and

(4) whether the reporter can complete the tasks within the time the trial 

court finds reasonable.

Should the trial court determine that the reporter will require more than thirty days 

to complete, certify, and file the reporter’s record, it shall arrange for a substitute reporter 

to do so. The trial court is directed to enter such orders necessary to address the 

aforementioned questions. So too shall it include its findings on those matters in a 

supplemental clerk’s record and cause that record to be filed with this Court by September 

20, 2024.

Should the reporter file the record on or before the date the trial court acts per our 

directive, she shall immediately notify the trial court of the filing, in writing, whereupon the 

trial court shall not be required to take any further action.
3

It is so ordered.

Per Curiam

Do not publish.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

DAY ELEV

 122.44

 122.32

 122.22

 122.25

 122.73

 122.69

 122.67

 122.62

 123.03

 123.20

 123.13

 123.27

 122.69

 122.13

 122.48

 122.52

 122.67

 122.94

 122.87

 122.81

 122.72

 122.73

 122.63

 122.74

 122.80

 122.82

 122.70

 122.56

 122.00

 121.91

 7,539

 7,485

 7,440

 7,454

 7,670

 7,652

 7,643

 7,620

 7,805

 7,885

 7,852

 7,918

 7,652

 7,400

 7,557

 7,575

 7,643

 7,764

 7,733

 7,706

 7,665

 7,670

 7,625

 7,674

 7,701

 7,710

 7,656

 7,593

 7,341

 7,303

STORAGE

-365

-54

-45

+14

+216

-18

-9

-23

+185

+80

-33

+66

-266

-252

+157

+18

+68

+121

-31

-27

-41

+5

-45

+49

+27

+9

-54

-63

-252

-38

CHANGE

365

503

514

603

711

594

593

590

698

649

587

624

457

453

650

587

615

643

573

574

568

591

560

606

595

587

553

555

447

547

INFLOW

 14

 13

 13

 13

 12

 10

 10

 10

 10

 10

 10

 10

 10

 10

 10

 10

 10

 10

 10

 10

 10

 10

 10

 10

 10

 10

 10

 10

 10

 10

POWER

 496

 478

 461

 449

 455

 458

 460

 457

 461

 465

 460

 446

 446

 435

 426

 433

 436

 438

 444

 443

 444

 443

 438

 436

 436

 437

 435

 442

 429

 421

SPILL

 39

 39

 63

 134

 134

 134

 128

 134

 134

 134

 134

 134

 134

 134

 134

 134

 134

 134

 134

 134

 134

 134

 134

 134

 134

 134

 134

 134

 134

 134

HATCHERY

 0

 0

 0

 0

 1

 1

 0

 1

 0

 0

 0

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 0

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

C.F.S.

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

NOVEMBER 2021 LAKE NATOMA DAILY OPERATIONS RUN DATE: December 2, 2021

IN LAKE

EVAP

C.F.S.

COMPUTED*

ACRE-FEET

RELEASE - C.F.S.

TOTALS -601 17,192 315 13,408 3,753 21

ACRE-FEET -601 34,100 625 26,595 7,444 42

COMMENTS:

* COMPUTED INFLOW IS THE SUM OF CHANGE IN STORAGE, RELEASES AND EVAPORATION.

SUMMARY

RELEASES (ACRE-FEET)

POWER 625

SPILL 26,595

FOLSOM SOUTH CANAL

HATCHERY

 0

 7,444

 7,904

FOLSOM

SOUTH 

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

(1)

(1) INCHES OF EVAPORATION TAKEN FROM FOLSOM PAN.

RELEASES (ACRE-FEET) 

TOTAL 34,664
§ 9.76 Knights Valley. ( a ) *Name.* The name of the viticultural area described in this section is “Knights Valley.”
( b ) *Approved maps.* The appropriate maps for determining the boundaries of the Knights Valley viticultural area are four U.S.G.S. maps. They are— ( 1 ) “Mount St. Helena Quadrangle, California,” 7.5 minute series, 1959 (Photoinspected 1973);
( 2 ) “Jimtown Quadrangle, California,” 7.5 minute series, 1955 (Photorevised 1975);
( 3 ) “Mark West Springs Quadrangle, California,” 7.5 minute series, 1958; and
( 4 ) “Detert Reservoir Quadrangle, California,” 7.5 minute series, 1958 (Photorevised 1980).
( c ) *Boundary.* The Knights Valley viticultural area is located in northeastern Sonoma County, California. From the beginning point lying at the intersection of the Sonoma/Lake County line and the north line of Section 11, Township 10 North (T. 10 N.), Range 8 West (R. 8 W.) on the “Mount St. Helena Quadrangle” map, the boundary runs— ( 1 ) Westerly along the north line of Sections 11, 10, and 9, T. 10 N., R. 8 W. to the northwest corner of Section 9 on the “Jimtown Quadrangle” map;
( 2 ) Then southerly along the west line of Sections 9, 16, 21, 28, and 33, T. 10 N., R. 8 W., continuing along the west line of Section 4, T. 9 N., R. 8 W. to the southwest corner thereof;
( 3 ) Then easterly along the south line of Section 4 to the southeast corner thereof on the “Mount St. Helena Quadrangle” map;
( 4 ) Then southerly along the west line of Sections 10, 15, and 22, T. 9 N., R. 8 W. to the point of intersection with Franz Creek in Section 22 on the “Mark West Springs Quadrangle” map;
( 5 ) Then easterly along Franz Creek approximately 14,000 feet to the centerline of Franz Valley Road;
( 6 ) Then southerly along the centerline of Franz Valley Road to the point of intersection with the west line of Section 6, T. 8 N., R. 7 W.;
( 7 ) Then southerly along the west line of Section 6 to the southwest corner thereof;
( 8 ) Then easterly along the south line of Sections 6, 5, and 4, T. 8 N., R. 7 W. to the southeast corner of Section 4;
( 9 ) Then northerly along the east line of Section 4 to the point of intersection with the Sonoma/Napa County line;
( 10 ) Then northerly along the meanders of the Sonoma/Napa County line on the “Mark West Springs Quadrangle,” “Detert Reservoir Quadrangle,” and “Mount St. Helena Quadrangle” maps to the point of intersection with the Lake County line on the “Mount St. Helena Quadrangle” map;
( 11 ) Then northerly along the meanders of the Sonoma/Lake County line on the “Mount St. Helena Quadrangle” and “Detert Reservoir Quadrangle” maps to the point of beginning.
[T.D. ATF-158, 48 FR 48816, Oct. 21, 1983]
#### Michael P. MURPHY, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Michelle MARTIN, et al., Defendants, Officer Johns, Defendant-Appellee.

No. 06-11150

Non-Argument Calendar.

D.C. Docket No. 05-00301-CY-BBM-1.

United States Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit.

July 7, 2006.

McNeill Stokes, Atlanta, GA, for Plaintiff-Appellant.

Annarita McGovern Busbee, Seacrest, Karesh, Tate *&*Bicknese, LLP, Atlanta, GA, for Defendant-Appellee.

Before DUBINA, BLACK and HULL, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

Michael P. Murphy appeals the district court’s grant of summary judgment to Officer Courtney Johns in Murphy’s 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action. Murphy asserts the district court erred in: (1) holding he had not exhausted his remedies under the Prison Litigation Reform Act, 42 U.S.C. § 1997e(a); (2) concluding an action cannot be brought under § 1983 for violations of civil rights that are defined as “torture” under 18 U.S.C. § 2340A; and (3) declining to exercise supplemental jurisdiction over his remaining state law claims. After a de novo review of the parties’ arguments *765and the record, we affirm for the reasons stated in the district court’s well-reasoned February 13, 2006, Order granting Johns’ motion for summary judgment.

AFFIRMED.
### ley as Lfccxct C>£ Ccim.oftL Appeals 

### k\ /Whn No, 05-13 ~DlSgk~C^ RECEIVEDIN COURTOFCRIMINALAPPEALS Vv^Vk bivVrici of ~TeK*\s AbelAcosta,Clerk AV OalWs 

### &M A?PE/VL Vro^T^ (Lr'^i^at DisVtd" Cx>uc+ Mo. (a OF Da\Uf> CouoVu TciaA Court N\o. 2^3 2C otUia ^p nnero

V6, S-UVfOf "T^xA^ 

### ^w»hM2? IMINAL APPEALS JUL 02 2015 Abel Acosta, Cierk

Wl6> M.Uk>y.^fc £>y ^>ocss

### 5k3 Kppe^Lr^mTkeCri^ioM DisWCourt Uo.c OQ Dallas Co(xnVu f'Tri^C.ocvr-t ^o. 2=1-3"2 G So fv\e^o K?PFUANT State, OS lexfcs iNfp^LLeiF *WtoM Io-EV+enp T\^^T^ Fil Cc>u& I OF Afft^ALS OF 

## fefgELLANT'3 Pro g>e, %.W for Dist^oARV Hg-v i£u3 

## To TWe V-Wo^AbUCou.r+ O^r (U^ioM K^e^ls- 

# .y ^7 CowC5 *'1"* ^, ^ IW i,4^e abooe 3^oo axase s^s^ ^ ((^^ ****** ^ ^>r

### DcVo ber (,, Zo,S Vo pre^ cWL-Ccle Appe IWVs iUfcoft



# cause Soc^s^^^WioA. -3-^^3-«>



# &*« sU , ^ ^"^ 'li F-^^ ProSc ^^abooe

4r\al fc.e.coc-0 "to Vier Cosses-Sio/).

~z-
---

Exhibit 99.9

March 31, 2015

CONSENT OF SAMUEL MAH

United States Securities and Exchange Commission

In connection with the filing of the Annual Report on Form 40-F
of Silver Wheaton Corp. for the year ended December 31, 2014 (the Annual
Report), I, Samuel Mah, M.A.Sc., P.Eng., Senior Director, Project Evaluations,
Silver Wheaton Corp., hereby consent to being named as having approved the
disclosure of the scientific and technical information contained in the Annual
Report under the headings Description of the Business, Technical
Information, Technical Information  Further Disclosure Regarding Mineral
Projects on Material Properties San Dimas Mines, Mexico,  Peñasquito Mine,
Mexico,  Pascua-Lama Project, Border of Chile and Argentina and Interest of
Experts contained in the Annual Information Form for the year ended December
31, 2014, included as Exhibit 99.1 to the Annual Report and incorporated by
reference into the Companys Registration Statement on Form S-8 (File No.
333-128128), Form F-10 (File No. 333-202429) and Form F-3D (File No.
333-194702). I hereby confirm that I have read the Annual Report and have no
reason to believe that there are any misrepresentations in the information
contained therein that is within my knowledge as a result of the services
performed by me in connection with my approval of the disclosure of the
scientific and technical information contained in the Annual Report.

Yours truly,

|/s/ Samuel Mah                       | 
|------------------------------------ | 
|Samuel Mah, M.A.Sc., P.Eng.          | 
|Senior Director, Project Evaluations | 
|Silver Wheaton Corp.                 | 

---
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA

FOURTH DISTRICT

CORY MINGO,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellee.

No. 4D14-2766

[October 19, 2017]

Appeal from the Circuit Court for the Seventeenth Judicial Circuit, 

Broward County; Paul L. Backman, Judge; L.T. Case No. 12014060CF10A.

Carey Haughwout, Public Defender, and Narine N. Austin, Assistant 

Public Defender, West Palm Beach, for appellant.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Cynthia L. 

Comras, Assistant Attorney General, West Palm Beach, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.

DAMOORGIAN, CONNER and FORST, JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
Order entered December 17, 2013

In The

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-13-00106-CR

SUZANNE BATTLES, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the County Criminal Court No. 5

Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. MB10-50867-F

ORDER

On October 28, 2013, this Court adopted a finding that the court reporter has received full 

payment for the reporter’s record. We ordered court reporter Charon Evans to file the reporter’s 

record within thirty days. To date, the record has not been filed.

Accordingly, we ORDER Charon Evans, official court reporter of the County Criminal 

Court No. 5, to file the reporter’s record by JANUARY 6, 2014. If the record is not filed by that 

date, the Court will order that Charon Evans not sit as a court reporter until the record is filed.

We DIRECT the Clerk to send copies of this order, by electronic transmission, to the 

Honorable Etta Mullin, Presiding Judge, County Criminal Court No. 5; Charon Evans, deputy 
Court Reporter, County Criminal Court No. 5; and to counsel for all parties.

/s/ DAVID EVANS

JUSTICE
### §5982. Purposes

It is the purpose of this subchapter—

(1) to encourage improved instruction for minorities and Native Americans in American government and civics through a national program of accredited summer teacher training and staff development seminars or institutes followed by academic year inservice training programs conducted on college and university campuses or other appropriate sites, for—

(A) social studies and other teachers responsible for American history, government, and civics classes; and

(B) other educators who work with minority and Native American youth; and

(2) through such improved instruction to improve minority and Native American student knowledge and understanding of the American system of government.

(Pub. L. 103–227, title VIII, §802, Mar. 31, 1994, 108 Stat. 209.)
#### § 216.14 Regular non-railroad employment that will not break a current connection.

Regular non-railroad employment will not break an employee's current connection if it is performed during the 30-month period described in § 216.13(b), in or after the month the annuity begins, or in the month the employee dies.
### §1821. Omitted

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section, Pub. L. 89–10, title IV, §421, as added Pub. L. 93–380, title IV, §401, Aug. 21, 1974, 88 Stat. 542, which authorized a program of grants relating to libraries and learning resources, was omitted in the general revision of the Elementary and Secondary Education Act of 1965, titles I to IX of Pub. L. 89–10, Apr. 11, 1965, 79 Stat. 27, by Pub. L. 95–561, Nov. 1, 1978, 92 Stat. 2143.
**EXHIBIT      32.1**

| 1.   | the                Periodic Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)                or                15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;                and |
|----------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| 2.   | the                information contained in the Periodic Report fairly presents, in                all                material respects, the financial condition and results of operations                of                the Company. |
|----------------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|                                     |                                                                                     |                                              |
|------------------------------------------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|---------------------------------------------------|
|                                     |                                                                                          |
|                                |                                                                                |                                         |
| Dated:               April 12, 2007 |                                                                                          | /s/Christopher              W.              Capps |
|                                     | Christopher                W. Capps, President andChief                Executive Officer |

----
```

[Congressional Bills 114th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 3866 Engrossed in House (EH)]

<DOC>
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
114th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 3866

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
   at 1265 Hurffville Road in Deptford Township, New Jersey, as the 
    ``First Lieutenant Salvatore S. Corma II Post Office Building''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. FIRST LIEUTENANT SALVATORE S. CORMA II POST OFFICE BUILDING.

    (a) Designation.--The facility of the United States Postal Service 
located 1265 Hurffville Road in Deptford Township, New Jersey, shall be 
known and designated as the ``First Lieutenant Salvatore S. Corma II 
Post Office Building''.
    (b) References.--Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, 
paper, or other record of the United States to the facility referred to 
in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``First 
Lieutenant Salvatore S. Corma II Post Office Building''.

            Passed the House of Representatives April 18, 2016.

            Attest:

                                                                 Clerk.
114th CONGRESS

  2d Session

                               H. R. 3866

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
   at 1265 Hurffville Road in Deptford Township, New Jersey, as the 
    ``First Lieutenant Salvatore S. Corma II Post Office Building''.
```
Exhibit 5.1
  
  Company Offering Selling Stockholders Registration Statement Common Shares
    (a)
    
    with respect to the Common Shares to be issued or sold by the Company, when the Common
Shares have been delivered in accordance with a definitive underwriting agreement
approved by the Board of Directors of the Company and upon payment of the
consideration therefor provided for therein (not less than the par value of the
Common Shares), the Common Shares will be duly authorized, validly issued, fully paid
and nonassessable; and(b)
    
    the Common Shares proposed to be sold by the Selling Stockholders are duly authorized, validly
issued, fully paid and nonassessable.
   Vinson & Elkins LLP Attorneys at Law 
Abu Dhabi Austin Beijing Dallas Dubai Hong Kong Houston 
London Moscow New York Palo Alto Shanghai Tokyo 
Washington
    
    First City Tower, 1001 Fannin Street, Suite 2500
Houston, TX 77002-6760Tel +1.713.758.2222 Fax +1.713.758.2346 www.velaw.com




---



##### 



Very truly yours,/s/ Vinson & Elkins L.L.P.
Exhibit 31.2I, Victor H.M. Ting, certify that:1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Trio-Tech International, a Californiacorporation;2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact oromit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstancesunder which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by thisreport;3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included inthis report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operationsand cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;4. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:     (a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls andprocedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating tothe registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within thoseentities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;     (b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures andpresented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls andprocedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and     (c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourthfiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonablylikely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and5. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the auditcommittee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):     (a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation ofinternal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect theregistrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and     (b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have asignificant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.Dated:November 13, 2006              /s/ VICTOR H.M. TING   Victor H.M. Ting, Chief Financial Officer   and Vice President (Principal Financial Officer)
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

September 9, 2015

No. 04-15-00556-CV

IN RE David Allan EDWARDS

Original Mandamus Proceeding1

ORDER

Sitting: Karen Angelini, Justice

Marialyn Barnard, Justice

Patricia O. Alvarez, Justice

On September 3, 2015, relator David Allan Edwards filed a pro se petition for writ of 

mandamus. The court has considered relator’s petition and is of the opinion that relator is not 

entitled to the relief sought. Accordingly, the petition for writ of mandamus is DENIED. See 

TEX. R. APP. P. 52.8(a). The court’s opinion will issue at a later date.

It is so ORDERED on September 9, 2015.

_________________________________

Patricia O. Alvarez, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said 

court on this 9th day of September, 2015.

___________________________________

Keith E. Hottle

Clerk of Court

 

1 This proceeding arises out of Cause No. 12-02-0185-CVA, styled David Allan Edwards v. County Court of 

Commissioners of Atascosa County, Texas, pending in the 81st Judicial District Court, Atascosa County, Texas, the 

Honorable Thomas F. Lee presiding.