alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY HIGH

 127

 122

 117

 119

 120

 123

 121

 121

 119

 119

 122

 123

 127

 118

 114

 112

 113

 115

 111

 112

 114

 112

 115

 117

 121

 125

 125

 125

 123

 122

 122

 111

 108

 108

 111

 111

 111

 112

 112

 111

 111

 110

 111

 110

 109

 104

 100

 100

 101

 105

 108

 107

 108

 109

 111

 112

 113

 114

 116

 116

 114

 113

 116

 114

 112

 115

 115

 115

 115

 116

 114

 114

 114

 115

 115

 113

 109

 106

 105

 107

 108

 110

 110

 110

 112

 113

 114

 116

 118

 119

 118

 117

 116

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

MAY 2017 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: June 5, 2017

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

14 DAY

ACCUM

MEAN

14 DAY

AVG

MEAN

 1,777

 1,747

 1,719

 1,698

 1,682

 1,670

 1,660

 1,649

 1,636

 1,628

 1,622

 1,616

 1,609

 1,603

 1,596

 1,588

 1,581

 1,573

 1,566

 1,561

 1,556

 1,550

 1,548

 1,547

 1,547

 1,548

 1,551

 1,557

 1,566

 1,577

 1,588

 127

 125

 123

 121

 120

 119

 119

 118

 117

 116

 116

 115

 115

 115

 114

 113

 113

 112

 112

 112

 111

 111

 111

 111

 111

 111

 111

 111

 112

 113

 113

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

JERSEY POINT TOP ON THE SAN JOAQUIN RIVER
#### Benz Auto Import Company of America, Appellant, v. Jesse Froehlich, Appellant.

Judgment and order affirmed, with costs. Ho opinion. Present — Ingraham, P. J., McLaughlin, Laughlin, Clarke and Scott, JJ.
EXHIBIT
32.1








CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906


OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002








In
connection with the Annual Report of Imaging Diagnostic Systems, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ending June 30, 2008, as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report"), I,
Linda B. Grable, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge and belief:





(1) the
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2) the
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.








/s/ Linda B.
Grable


Linda B.
Grable


Chief
Executive Officer and


Chairman
of the Board


September
12, 2008
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 9
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1999
<CASH>                                           5,760
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                               0
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                 4,115
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                     32,329
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                          25,726
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                            26,415
<LOANS>                                        139,564
<ALLOWANCE>                                      2,153
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 213,010
<DEPOSITS>                                     176,190
<SHORT-TERM>                                     7,869
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                              1,226
<LONG-TERM>                                      4,856
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         2,238
<OTHER-SE>                                      20,631
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>                 213,010
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                  6,409
<INTEREST-INVEST>                                1,810
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                   144
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                                 8,363
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                               3,494
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               3,850
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                            4,513
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                      204
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                   0
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                  2,926
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  1,963
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                           0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     1,501
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.67
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.66
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    0.00
<LOANS-NON>                                          0
<LOANS-PAST>                                         0
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                     0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                      0
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                 2,239
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                      305
<RECOVERIES>                                        16
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                                2,153
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                             2,153
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                            594
        

</TABLE>
|Exhibit 32.2

SECTION 906
CERTIFICATION BY JAMES G. PRATT

Pursuant to the requirements of
Section 906 of the Sarbannes-Oxley Act of 2002, James G. Pratt hereby certifies
that:

1. This report fully complies with
the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the 1934 Act, and

2. The information contained in
this report fairly presents, in all material respects, the registrants financial
condition and results of operations of the registrant.
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

|Date | 8/12/2003 | By |  | /s/ James
      G. Pratt                                    
|---- | --------- | -- |  | ------------------------------------------------------------
|     |           |    |  |                                                             
|     |           |    |  | James
      G. Pratt, Treasurer and Chief Accounting Officer

|A signed original of this written
statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Hills Bancorporation and  will be
retained by Hills Bancorporation and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission
or its staff  upon request.
|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

|
|
#### § 10.320 Can OWCP require an employee to be examined by another physician?

OWCP sometimes needs a second opinion from a medical specialist. The employee must submit to examination by a qualified physician as often and at such times and places as OWCP considers reasonably necessary. The employee may have a qualified physician, paid by him or her, present at such examination. However, the employee is not entitled to have anyone else present at the examination unless there is rationalized medical evidence that establishes that someone else is needed in the room or OWCP decides that exceptional circumstances exist. Where an employee requires an accommodation, such as where a hearing-impaired employee needs an interpreter, the presence of an interpreter will be allowed. Also, OWCP may send a case file for second opinion review where actual examination is not needed, or where the employee is deceased.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

DAY HIGH

 14,101

 14,534

 15,194

 16,659

 17,578

 16,267

 16,459

 16,109

 15,441

 13,959

 13,176

 13,347

 13,425

 13,271

 14,558

 15,232

 15,323

 14,703

 13,900

 13,917

 12,616

 12,750

 3,382

 3,023

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 5,982

 6,558

 7,285

 7,136

 7,166

 6,891

 6,908

 6,661

 7,272

 6,952

 6,936

 7,168

 7,275

 7,187

 7,947

 8,724

 8,464

 8,376

 7,802

 6,769

 3,425

 2,954

 2,616

 2,315

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 10,486

 10,652

 11,151

 11,974

 11,926

 11,787

 11,697

 11,595

 12,259

 11,272

 10,817

 10,635

 10,396

 10,329

 10,860

 11,491

 11,787

 11,615

 11,544

 11,157

 10,150

 7,608

 3,104

 2,785

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

NOVEMBER 2021 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: January 27, 2022

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

PORT CHICAGO TOP IN SUISUN BAY
§ 30.603 Are there any limitations on what the representative may charge the claimant for his or her services? ( a ) Notwithstanding any contract, the representative may not receive, for services rendered in connection with a claim pending before OWCP, more than the percentages of the lump-sum payment made to the claimant set out in paragraph (b) of this section, exclusive of costs and expenses.
( b ) The percentages referred to in paragraph (a) of this section are: ( 1 ) 2 percent for the filing of an initial claim with OWCP, provided that the representative was retained prior to the filing of the initial claim; plus
( 2 ) 10 percent of the difference between the lump-sum payment made to the claimant and the amount proposed in the recommended decision with respect to objections to a recommended decision.
( c ) ( 1 ) Any representative who violates this section shall be fined not more than $5,000.
( 2 ) The authority to prosecute violations of this limitation lies with the Department of Justice.
( d ) The fee limitations described in this section shall not apply with respect to representative services that are rendered in connection with a petition filed with a U.S. District Court seeking review of an OWCP decision that is final pursuant to § 30.316(d), or with respect to any subsequent appeal in such a proceeding.
[71 FR 78534, Dec. 29, 2006, as amended at 84 FR 3053, Feb. 8, 2019]
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. §1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with Amendment No. 4 to the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2008 (the Report) of Community Bankers Trust Corporation (the
Company), the undersigned Executive Vice President, who is acting as the Companys principal executive officer, and Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant
to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to their knowledge:



|(1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|--- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|(2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the consolidated financial condition and results of operations of the Company and its
subsidiaries as of, and for, the periods presented in the Report.
|--- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



/s/ Rex L. Smith, IIIRex L. Smith, III Executive
Vice President (principal executive officer)/s/ Bruce E. ThomasBruce E. Thomas Executive
Vice President and Chief Financial Officer


Date: April 8, 2011
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY HIGH

 720

 628

 744

 780

 729

 726

 692

 725

 708

 739

 709

 713

 798

 810

 833

 807

 828

 755

 800

 740

 758

 819

 572

 898

 819

 826

 772

 854

 881

 890

 797

 385

 390

 425

 397

 402

 416

 431

 458

 511

 499

 511

 524

 461

 430

 420

 390

 366

 351

 340

 329

 326

 353

 350

 439

 364

 464

 424

 521

 602

 623

 498

 500

 476

 509

 495

 532

 527

 544

 561

 587

 602

 601

 600

 587

 554

 549

 528

 507

 460

 482

 429

 497

 511

 389

 739

 518

 639

 592

 711

 749

 782

 582

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

DECEMBER 2012 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: February 7, 2013

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

DELTA MENDOTA CANAL AT CHECK 13 (O'NEILL)
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

DAY HIGH

 0

 0

 17,650

 27,401

 24,342

 25,489

 22,198

 20,791

 17,073

 16,405

 18,111

 23,138

 24,411

 24,930

 26,248

 25,908

 25,464

 23,556

 24,363

 21,763

 23,381

 20,283

 21,459

 20,888

 22,337

 21,915

 24,050

 25,176

 27,077

 26,366

 0

 0

 8,624

 8,318

 6,769

 7,682

 6,667

 5,928

 8,050

 7,777

 8,554

 10,590

 9,718

 12,239

 11,212

 10,228

 9,206

 6,418

 9,095

 6,691

 9,738

 9,858

 9,120

 8,491

 8,949

 5,834

 7,873

 11,598

 10,310

 9,658

 0

 0

 14,042

 16,865

 13,767

 15,811

 14,272

 13,218

 13,141

 12,638

 11,987

 13,758

 16,027

 17,585

 17,304

 16,988

 16,045

 14,664

 16,070

 15,066

 15,907

 15,540

 15,575

 14,978

 15,107

 13,631

 14,239

 17,099

 16,348

 16,739

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

JUNE 2008 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: July 1, 2008

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

PORT CHICAGO TOP IN SUISUN BAY
§ 229.40 When an annuity increase under the overall minimum ends. ( a ) *Employee Age O/M.* An increase in an employee's annuity under the overall minimum based on age ends with the month before the month in which the employee dies. If a disability annuity is increased under the overall minimum based on age rather than disability, and the employee is under retirement age, the increase ends with the second month after the month the disability ends as shown in part 220 of this chapter.
( b ) *Employee DIB O/M.* An increase in an employee's annuity under the overall minimum based on disability ends with the earlier of: ( 1 ) The month before the month in which the employee dies; or
( 2 ) The month before the month the employee attains retirement age (the DIB O/M is changed to an age O/M); or
( 3 ) The second month after the month the disability ends, as explained in part 220 of this chapter.
( c ) *Spouse.* An increase in a spouse annuity under the overall minimum ends when the increase in the employee annuity ends, as shown in paragraphs (a) and (b) of this section, when the spouse can no longer be included in computing the annuity rate under the overall minimum as shown in § 229.41 of this part, or when the spouse annuity ends as shown in part 218 of this chapter.
Exhibit 5.1
   
 Claires Stores, Inc., Registration Statement on Form S-4




---



##### 








---



##### 



SCHEDULE I
 Covered Guarantors
 1.
    
    BMS Distributing Corp., a Delaware corporation2.
    
    CBI Distributing Corp., a Delaware corporation3.
    
    Claires Canada Corp., a Delaware corporation4.
    
    Claires Puerto Rico Corp., a Delaware corporation5.
    
    CSI Canada LLC, a Delaware limited liability company
Served: December 19 , 201 3

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY

WASHINGTON, DC

NOTICE

Japan Charter Authorizations

(January 1

– December 31, 20 1 4 )

Under the terms of the 20 10 U.S.

- Japan Memorandum of Understanding ( 20 10 MOU ), U.S.

carriers may operate an unlimited number of one

- way charter flights (hereinafter we refer to

“one

- way charters” simply as “charters”) between the United States and J apan during the

20 1 4 calendar year (January 1

- December 31, 20 1 4 ), subject to the limitation that no more

than six hundred ( 6 00) charters may operate to or from Tokyo ’s Haneda Airport

. As a result

of the 20 10 MOU , U .S. carriers now only require a Notice of Consistency from the

Department when operating charters between the United States and Haneda

. 1

We have determined that the demand for U .S.

- Haneda charters for the 201 4 calendar year can

continue to be met by using th e U.S.

- Tokyo charter allocation procedures that were implemented for the 2008 c alendar year and have remained in place for subsequent c alendar

years. Specifically, t he 6 00 U.S.

- Haneda charter s will be available to U.S. carriers for

distribution for the 2014 calendar year on a first

- come, first

- serve d basis subject to the

following procedures and conditions:

1. Applications to operate U.S.

- Haneda charters may be filed no earlier than 1 20 days in

advance of the flight date

. 2 For the period January 1 through October 31, 20 1 4

, carriers may apply for up to 50 charters per month. After October 31, 20 1 4 , no restrictions apply on the number of charters that may be applied for each month;

2. Applications must identify the type of charter (passenger or cargo); the date of each

one

- wa y flight; the charterer(s); the city

- pair markets involved by direction; the type

of aircraft to be used; and (for cargo charters) the type of cargo transported. Carriers

may be asked to provide copies of signed charter contracts;

1 T his does not relieve U.S. carriers from the requirement to obtain proper authorization for all U.S.

- Japan

charters from the Japan Ministry of Land, Infrastructure and Transport (MLIT)

. 2 Applications should be sent by e

- mail to darren.jaffe @dot.gov , or by fax to 202

- 366

- 3694.3. The Department will g rant U.S.

- Haneda charter pool allocations by providing a Notice

of Consistency to applicant carriers; 3

4. Carriers receiving a charter pool allocation shall, in writing, return any unused

allocations to the U.S. Air Carrier Licensing Division

. 4

By:

Paul L. Gretch, Director

Office of International Aviation

(SEAL)

Dated: December 19 , 201 3

An electronic version of this document is available on the World Wide Web at:

http://www.regulations.gov

3 The carrier must also obtain proper authorization for its U.S.

- Haneda charters from the Japan M LIT

. 4 This notification must be received within two business days of the carrier’s determination that an allocated

flight or flights will not operate.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY ELEV

 359.97

 359.94

 359.97

 359.97

 359.97

 359.94

 359.97

 359.97

 359.97

 359.97

 359.97

 359.97

 359.97

 359.94

 359.97

 359.94

 360.24

 360.24

 360.68

 360.68

 360.55

 360.19

 359.94

 359.94

 359.97

 359.94

 359.94

 360.00

 360.68

 360.68

 360.71

 535

 533

 535

 535

 535

 533

 535

 535

 535

 535

 535

 535

 535

 533

 535

 533

 554

 554

 585

 585

 576

 550

 533

 533

 535

 533

 533

 537

 585

 585

 587

STORAGE

+2

-2

+2

+0

+0

-2

+2

+0

+0

+0

+0

+0

+0

-2

+2

-2

+21

+0

+31

+0

-9

-26

-17

+0

+2

-2

+0

+4

+48

+0

+2

CHANGE

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 204

 206

 205

 206

 205

 205

 206

 205

 208

 205

 201

 203

 205

 205

 203

 204

 392

 613

 763

 1,505

 1,351

 794

 345

 207

 214

 214

 208

 214

 905

 1,503

 1,505

SPILL

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

OUTLET

OAKDALE IRRIGATION DISTRICT

SOUTH SAN JOAQUIN IRRIGATION DISTRICT

TRI DAMS PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

DECEMBER 2010 GOODWIN RESERVOIR DAILY OPERATIONS RUN DATE: January 3, 2011

RES.

ACRE-FEET

RELEASE - C.F.S. 

TOTALS +54 0 14,009 0

ACRE-FEET +54 0 27,787 0

SUMMARY

RELEASE (ACRE-FEET)

JOINT MAIN CANAL 0

SOUTH MAIN CANAL 0

 27,787

 533

OUTLET 0

TOTAL 

TULLOCH

RELEASE

 241

 244

 245

 245

 240

 238

 240

 246

 249

 248

 250

 254

 251

 235

 215

 195

 364

 538

 701

 1,500

 1,260

 794

 319

 190

 197

 197

 196

 192

 833

 1,502

 1,510

 14,129

 28,025

JOINT MAIN OPERATED BY SSJID AND OID.

SOUTH MAIN OPERATED BY OID.

JOINT

MAIN

SOUTH

MAIN

SPILL 27,787

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

RIVER CANALS
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Justice

###### Drug Enforcement Administration

          - [Docket No. 10-34]

# ACTION:

Correction.

On Thursday, April 7, 2011, the Drug Enforcement Administration published the above-titled Decision and Order, as well as the Decision of the Administrative Law Judge (76 FR 19450). In preparing the document for publication, the files were merged resulting in the footnotes of the Administrative Law Judge's Decision being numbered sequentially to follow the footnote numbers of the Decision and Order rather than beginning with the number 1 as they did in the ALJ's slip opinion.

Therefore, this notice corrects footnotes 4 through 67 appearing in the Decision signed by the U.S. Administrative Law Judge to be footnotes 1 through 64 beginning at 76 FR 19451 under the second column.

Dated: April 8, 2011.

Michele M. Leonhart,

Administrator.

[FR Doc. 2011-9170 Filed 4-14-11; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4410-09-P
§ 10.316 After selecting a treating physician, may an employee choose to be treated by another physician instead? ( a ) When the physician originally selected to provide treatment for a work-related injury refers the employee to a specialist for further medical care, the employee need not consult OWCP for approval. In all other instances, however, the employee must submit a written request to OWCP with his or her reasons for desiring a change of physician.
( b ) OWCP will approve the request if it determines that the reasons submitted are sufficient. Requests that are often approved include those for transfer of care from a general practitioner to a physician who specializes in treating conditions like the work-related one, or the need for a new physician when an employee has moved. The employer may not authorize a change of physicians.