alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
---

Exhibit 99.9

March 31, 2017

CONSENT OF RYAN ULANSKY

United States Securities and Exchange Commission

In connection with the filing of the Annual Report on Form 40-F
of Silver Wheaton Corp. for the year ended December 31, 2016 (the Annual
Report), I, Ryan Ulansky, M.A.Sc., P.Eng., Senior Director, Engineering, Silver
Wheaton Corp., hereby consent to being named as having approved the disclosure
of the scientific and technical information contained in the Annual Report under
the headings Description of the Business, Technical Information, Technical
Information  Further Disclosure Regarding Mineral Projects on Material
Properties San Dimas Mines, Mexico,  Peñasquito Mine, Mexico, - Salobo Mine,
Brazil and Interest of Experts contained in the Annual Information Form for
the year ended December 31, 2016, included as Exhibit 99.1 to the Annual Report
and incorporated by reference into the Companys Registration Statement on Form
S-8 (File No. 333-128128), Form F-10 (File No. 333-203682) and Form F-3D (File
No. 333-194702). I hereby confirm that I have read the Annual Report and have no
reason to believe that there are any misrepresentations in the information
contained therein that is within my knowledge as a result of the services
performed by me in connection with my approval of the disclosure of the
scientific and technical information contained in the Annual Report.

Yours truly,

/s/ Ryan
Ulansky Ryan Ulansky, M.A.Sc., P.Eng. Senior Director, Engineering
Silver Wheaton Corp.

---
#### § 771.74 Prior to hearing.

All motions that should be made prior to the hearing, such as a motion directed to the sufficiency of the pleadings or of preliminary orders, shall be filed in writing with the Director of Industry Operations or the administrative law judge if the matter has been referred to him, and shall briefly state the order or relief applied for and the grounds for such motion.
§ 219.22 When evidence of death is required. ( a ) *When evidence of the employee's death is required.* Evidence to prove the employee's death is always required for payment of any type of survivor annuity or lump-sum payment based on the deceased employee's record. See parts 216 and 234 for types of survivor payments.
( b ) *When evidence to prove death of other persons is required.* Evidence to prove the death of persons other than the empoyee is required when— ( 1 ) A claimant, who is eligible for survivor benefits, dies after the employee;
( 2 ) A residual lump sum (see part 234 of this chapter) is payable and a person whom the employee named to receive all or part of this payment dies before the employee, or such person dies after the employee but before receiving his or her share of the benefit; or
( 3 ) There is reasonable doubt of the death of— ( i ) Any person who, if alive, has priority over the applicant;
( ii ) Any spouse whose death is alleged to have ended a previous marriage, if a later marriage in question cannot be presumed valid under state law; or
( iii ) Any person the termination of whose entitlement would increase payments to other entitled persons.
### §9801. Repealed. Pub. L. 111–358, title X, §1002(a)(1), Jan. 4, 2011, 124 Stat. 4048

Section, Pub. L. 110–69, title VI, §6001, Aug. 9, 2007, 121 Stat. 625, related to congressional findings.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Short Title

Pub. L. 110–69, §1, Aug. 9, 2007, 121 Stat. 572, provided that: "This Act [see Tables for classification] may be cited as the 'America COMPETES Act' or the 'America Creating Opportunities to Meaningfully Promote Excellence in Technology, Education, and Science Act'."

#### Accountability and Transparency of Activities Authorized by Pub. L. 110–69

Pub. L. 110–69, title VIII, §8008, Aug. 9, 2007, 121 Stat. 718, provided that:

"(a) Prohibited Use of Funds.—A grant or contract funded by amounts authorized by this Act [see Tables for classification] may not be used for the purpose of defraying the costs of a banquet or conference that is not directly and programmatically related to the purpose for which the grant or contract was awarded. A directly and programmatically related banquet or conference includes a banquet or conference held in connection with planning, training, assessment, review, or other routine purposes related to a project funded by the grant or contract. Records of the total costs related to, and justifications for, all banquets and conferences shall be reported to the appropriate Department, Administration, or Foundation. Not later than 60 days after receipt of such records, the appropriate Department, Administration, or Foundation shall make the records available to the public.

"(b) Conflict of Interest Statement.—Any person awarded a grant or contract funded by amounts authorized by this Act shall submit a statement to the Secretary of Commerce, the Secretary of Energy, the Secretary of Education, the Administrator, or the Director, as appropriate, certifying that no funds derived from the grant or contract will be made available through a subcontract or in any other manner to another person who has a financial interest or other conflict of interest in the person awarded the grant or contract, unless such conflict is previously disclosed and approved in the process of entering into a contract or awarding a grant. Not later than 60 days after receipt of the certification, the appropriate Secretary, Administrator, or Director shall make all documents received that relate to the certification available to the public.

"(c) Application to Federal Grants and Contracts.—Subsections (a) and (b) shall take effect 360 days after the date of enactment of this Act [Aug. 9, 2007].

"(d) Exception.—Subsections (a) and (b) shall not apply to grants or contracts authorized under sections 6201 and 6203 [former 20 U.S.C. 9851, 9853]."
UN PUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 20
- 1563

BRIAN JAMES HUFFSTICKLE , Plaintiff

- Appellant , and
MICHELLE DAWN HUFFSTICKLE , Plaintiff ,

v. 21ST MORTGAGE , Defendant

- Appellee

.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina , at Rock Hill

. Mary G. Lewis , District Judge. ( 0:19

- cv
- 02523

- MGL )

Submitted : December 17, 2020 Decided: March 3, 2021

Before KING, DIAZ, and RICHARDSON , Circuit Judges.

Vacated and remanded by un published per curiam opinion

.

Brian James Huffstickle , Appellant Pro Se. Theodore Von Keller , CRAWFORD & VON KELLER, LLC , Columbia, South Carolina, for A ppellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM:
Brian and Michelle Huffstickle appeal the district court’s order adopting the magistrate judge’s recommendation to grant Defendant’s motion for summary judgment
and dismiss their civil action

. In its order, the court stated that the Huffstickles failed to object to the report and reco mmendation. On appeal, the Huffstickles claim that they never received the report and recommendation. A party who fails to timely object in writing to a magistrate judge’s proposed findings of fact and conclusions of law is not entitled to de novo review of the magistrate judge’s determinations by the district court and is barred from contesting those determinations on appeal. Wright v. Collins , 766 F.2d 841, 845

- 46 (4th Cir. 1985); see 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). However, the waiver of appellate rights for failing to object is a prudential rule, not a jurisdictional requirement. Thomas v. Arn , 474 U.S. 140, 154 (1985). And, when a litigant is proceeding pro se, he or she must be accorded fair notice of the consequences of failing to object before being barred from appellate review. Wright , 766
F.2d at 846

- 47. From the present record, we cannot conclusively determine whether the Huffstickles received a copy of the magist rate judge’s report and recommendation. Accordingly, we
vacate the district court’s order and remand for the court to make this determination in the
first instance. If the court find s the Huffstickles’ claim to be credible, it should provide
them with a copy of the report and recommendation and accord them an opportunity to object. If, however, the court finds that they received the report and recommendation, it may reenter its original order, with any necessary modifications.3 We dispense with oral argu ment because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
VACATED AND REMANDED
#### In the Matter of Isidore Oshlag.

Referred to official referee. Order to be settled on notice. Present — Ingraham, P. J., McLaughlin, Laughlin, Clarke and Scott, JJ.
## In The **Court of Appeals Seventh District of Texas at Amarillo** 

________________________ No. 07 - 20 - 00165 - C V

________________________ UNITED PHOSPHORUS, LTD., UPL CORPORATION, LIMITED, AND UNITED PHOSPHORUS, INC. , APPELLANT S V. PETER BALDERAS AND MARTHA BALDERAS, INDIVIDUALLY AND ON BEHALF OF THEIR INJURED AND DECEASED MINOR CHILDREN, P . B . AND E . B . , INJURED MINORS , AND F . B . , J . B . , J . B . , AND Y . B . , DECEASED MINOR CHILDREN , AND JACQUELINE BALDERAS, INDIVIDUALLY, AND CASANDRA BALDERAS, INDIVIDUALLY , APPELLEE S On Permissive Appeal from the 10 8th District Court Potter C ounty, Texas Trial Court No. 106,846 - E - CV ; Honorable Douglas R. Woodburn , Presiding December 30 , 20 20 

### MEMORANDUM OPINION Before QUINN, C.J., and PIRTLE and DOSS , JJ. On July 28, 2020 , we granted the Petition for Permissive Appeal filed by Appellants, United Phosphorus, Ltd., UPL Corporation , Limited, and United Phosphorus, Inc., permitting an interlocutory appeal from the trial court’s Amended Order Denying2 Defendants’ Motion for Summary Judgment Regarding FIFRA . See T EX . C IV . P RAC . & R EM . C ODE A NN . § 51.014( d) (West 2015 ) ; T EX . R. A PP . P . 2 8.3. On November 16, 2020, we abated the appeal pursuant to the parties’ motion to allow the parties to complete their settlement negotiations. The appeal has been reinstated. Now pending before the court is the parties’ joint motion notifying the court that all matters in controversy have been compromised and settled and seeking voluntary dismissal of the appeal. The court finds the motion complies with the requirements of Rule of Appellate Procedure 42.1(a)(1) and that granting the motion will not prevent any party from seeking relief to which it would otherwise be entitled. As no decision of the court has been delivered to date, we grant the motion. The appeal is dismissed. Because the motion does not address costs, costs will b e taxed against Appellant s . T EX . R. A PP . P . 42.1(d). No motion for rehearing will be entertained and our mandate will issue forthwith. Per Curiam
§ 1010.310 How will priority of service be applied? ( a ) Recipients of funds for qualified job training programs must implement processes in accordance with § 1010.300 to identify covered persons at the point of entry, whether in person or virtual, so the covered person can be notified of their eligibility for priority of service. Since qualified job training programs may offer various types of services including staff-assisted services as well as self-services or informational activities, recipients also must ensure that priority of service is implemented throughout the full array of services provided to covered persons by the qualified job training program.
( b ) Three categories of qualified job training programs affect the application of priority of service: universal access, discretionary targeting and statutory targeting. To obtain priority, a covered person must meet the statutory eligibility requirement(s) applicable to the specific program from which services are sought. For those programs that also have discretionary or statutory priorities or preferences pursuant to a Federal statute or regulation, recipients must coordinate providing priority of service with applying those other priorities, as prescribed in paragraphs (b)(2) and (b)(3) of this section. ( 1 ) *Universal access programs* operate or deliver services to the public as a whole; they do not target specific groups. These programs are required to provide priority of service to covered persons.
( 2 ) *Discretionary targeting programs* focus on a particular group, or make efforts to provide a certain level of service to such a group, but do not specifically mandate that the favored group be served before other eligible individuals. Whether these provisions are found in a Federal statute or regulation, priority of service will apply. Covered persons must receive the highest priority for the program or service, and non-covered persons within the discretionary targeting will receive priority over non-covered persons outside the discretionary targeting.
( 3 ) *Statutory targeting programs* are programs derived from a Federal statutory mandate that requires a priority or preference for a particular group of individuals or requires spending a certain portion of program funds on a particular group of persons receiving services. These are mandatory priorities. Recipients must determine each individual's covered person status and apply priority of service as described below: ( i ) Covered persons who meet the mandatory priorities or spending requirement or limitation must receive the highest priority for the program or service;
( ii ) Non-covered persons within the program's mandatory priority or spending requirement or limitation, must receive priority for the program or service over covered persons outside the program-specific mandatory priority or spending requirement or limitation; and,
( iii ) Covered persons outside the program-specific mandatory priority or spending requirement or limitation must receive priority for the program or service over non-covered persons outside the program-specific mandatory priority or spending requirement or limitation.
EXHIBIT 32.1





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350



The undersigned, Elaine K. Roberts, President and Chief Financial Officer of Oppenheimer Holdings Inc. (the "Company"), hereby certifies that to his knowledge the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the period ended December 31, 2005 of the Company filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof  (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company for the period specified.



Signed at New York, New York, this 9th day of March, 2006.



/s/ E.K. Roberts

Elaine K. Roberts

President and Chief Financial Officer
Exhibit 99.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
(18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350)

In connection with the Annual Report of Tasty Fries, Inc, a Nevada corporation
(the "Company"), on Form 10-KSB for the year ending January 31, 2003 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the "Report"), I, Edward C. Kelly,
Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to ss. 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. ss. 1350), that to my knowledge:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.

/s/ Edward C. Kelly
Edward C. Kelly
Chief Executive Officer

May 16, 2003

[A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to Tasty Fries, Inc. and will be retained by Tasty Fries, Inc. and
furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.]
#### § 7.23 [Reserved]

Requirements for Malt Beverages Imported in Containers
### §4517. Appropriations for universities

There is hereby appropriated to each recipient University named above or to the trustee of the fund designated by the President of the University the sum of $800,000 to carry out the provisions of section 4516 of this title, to be available on November 1, 1987, and to remain available until expended.

(Pub. L. 99–500, §101(b) [title VIII, §818], Oct. 18, 1986, 100 Stat. 1783–39, 1783–82, and Pub. L. 99–591, §101(b) [title VIII, §818], Oct. 30, 1986, 100 Stat. 3341–39, 3341–82.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Pub. L. 99–591 is a corrected version of Pub. L. 99–500.
**EXHIBIT 12.1**

** **

**FORM 10-Q**

**PACCAR FINANCIAL CORP.**

 

### **COMPUTATION OF RATIO OF EARNINGSTO FIXED CHARGES**

 

### **PURSUANT TO SEC REPORTINGREQUIREMENTS******(1)

### (Millions of Dollars)

 
| ** **                         | ** ** | **Three Months Ended** | ** **  |
|------------------------------------|------------|----------------------------------|-------------|
| ** **                         | ** ** | **March 31**                | ** **  |
| ** **                         | ** ** | **2006**                         | ** **  | **2005** | ** ** |
|                               |       |                             |        |   |   |
| FIXED CHARGES                      |       |                             |        |   |   |
| Interest expense                   | ** ** | **$**                            | **34.6**    |   | $ | 20.1 |   |
| Portion of rentals deemed interest | ** ** | **.4**                           |        | .4 |   |
|                               |       |                             |        |   |   |
| TOTAL FIXED CHARGES                | ** ** | **$**                            | **35.0**    |   | $ | 20.5 |   |
|                               |       |                             |        |   |   |
| EARNINGS                           |       |                             |        |   |   |
| Income before income taxes         | ** ** | **$**                            | **32.1**    |   | $ | 29.6 |   |
| Fixed charges                      | ** ** | **35.0**                         |        | 20.5 |   |
|                               |       |                             |        |   |   |
| EARNINGS AS DEFINED                | ** ** | **$**                            | **67.1**    |   | $ | 50.1 |   |
|                               |       |                             |        |   |   |
| RATIO OF EARNINGS TO FIXED CHARGES | ** ** | **1.92**                         | **X**  | 2.44 | X  |

 

----

(1) The method of computing the ratio of earnings to fixed chargesshown above complies with SEC reporting requirements but differs from themethod called for in the Support Agreement between the Company and PACCAR asshown in Exhibit 12.2.

 

----
Exhibit 99.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

     In connection with the Quarterly Report of Vital Health Technologies, Inc.
(the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ending March 31, 2003, as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),
Halton Martin, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certifies to the best of
his knowledge, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Sec. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Sec. 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
     of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
     respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.


/s/ Halton Martin
-------------------------
Halton Martin
Chief Financial Officer
May 13, 2003

The foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Sec.1350 and is not being filed as part of the Report or as a separate
disclosure document.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY

 28,816

 29,025

 29,253

 29,476

 29,679

 29,860

 30,263

 30,689

 30,934

 31,138

 31,357

 31,670

 32,085

 32,577

 32,883

 33,119

 33,355

 33,383

 32,983

 32,112

 31,273

 30,405

 29,506

 28,685

 27,840

 26,909

 26,086

 25,301

 24,485

 23,522

 22,845

 57,030

 56,091

 54,909

 53,745

 52,570

 51,357

 50,261

 49,224

 48,062

 47,797

 47,665

 47,473

 46,844

 45,794

 44,681

 43,525

 42,379

 41,423

 40,911

 40,837

 40,743

 40,728

 40,733

 40,650

 40,556

 40,541

 40,390

 40,218

 40,083

 40,083

 39,778

STORAGE - A.F. 

 85,846

 85,116

 84,162

 83,221

 82,249

 81,217

 80,524

 79,913

 78,996

 78,935

 79,022

 79,143

 78,929

 78,371

 77,564

 76,644

 75,734

 74,806

 73,894

 72,949

 72,016

 71,133

 70,239

 69,335

 68,396

 67,450

 66,476

 65,519

 64,568

 63,605

 62,623

2,563

4,044

1,654

1,385

1,420

1,180

1,767

2,329

1,302

1,074

546

809

960

1,467

1,368

1,110

1,160

1,081

1,213

1,004

1,011

1,250

1,383

1,155

1,187

1,053

1,197

1,107

1,017

1,032

1,195

2,152

3,676

1,173

911

930

660

1,425

2,021

840

1,043

590

870

852

1,186

961

646

701

613

753

528

541

805

932

699

714

576

706

625

538

546

700

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

DECEMBER 2019 FULL NATURAL FLOW AT NEW MELONES DAM RUN DATE: 01/07/2020

TOTALS -24,039 29,913

* October 1, 59,332

 58.0

 65.3

 67.6

 69.4

 71.2

 72.6

 75.4

 79.4

 81.1

 83.1

 84.3

 86.0

 87.7

 90.1

 92.0

 93.3

 94.6

 95.9

 97.4

 98.4

 99.5

 101.1

 102.9

 104.3

 105.7

 106.9

 108.3

 109.5

 110.6

 111.7

 113.0

DONNELLS

RES

BEARDSLEY

RES

2019 TO DATE

NEW

MELONES

INFLOW

C.F.S

NATURAL

RIVER

C.F.S

ACCUM *

FULL

NATURAL

1000 A.F.

RESERVOIR

TOTAL

-816

-730

-954

-941

-972

-1,032

-693

-611

-917

-61

+87

+121

-214

-558

-807

-920

-910

-928

-912

-945

-933

-883

-894

-904

-939

-946

-974

-957

-951

-963

-982

CHANGE

A.F. C.F.S.

-411

-368

-481

-474

-490

-520

-349

-308

-462

-31

+44

+61

-108

-281

-407

-464

-459

-468

-460

-476

-470

-445

-451

-456

-473

-477

-491

-482

-479

-486

-495
**Exhibit 32.1**

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO**

**18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Consolidated Resources Health Care Fund II (the “Partnership”) on  Form 10-Q for the period ending September 30, 2005 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, John F. McMullan, Principal Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the Partnership, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, subject to the qualification noted below:

(1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934; and 

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of the operations of the Partnership.

This certification is qualified by the fact that the Report was not filed within 45 days after the end of the Partnership’s quarter as required by General Instruction A to Form 10-Q.
| Date: August 2, 2006 | By:              /s/ John F. McMullan                             |
|----------------------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

       John F. McMullan

       Chief Financial Officer (chief executive and chief