alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 1001.161 What definitions apply to this part? *Department* means the United States Department of Labor, including its agencies and organizational units and their representatives.
*Eligible person,* as defined at 38 U.S.C. 4101(5), means: ( 1 ) The spouse of any person who died of a service-connected disability;
( 2 ) The spouse of any member of the Armed Forces serving on active duty who, at the time of application for assistance under this chapter, is listed, pursuant to 37 U.S.C. 556 and regulations issued thereunder by the Secretary concerned, in one or more of the following categories and has been so listed for a total of more than ninety days: ( i ) Missing in action,
( ii ) Captured in line of duty by a hostile force, or
( iii ) Forcibly detained or interned in line of duty by a foreign government or power; or
( 3 ) The spouse of any person who has a total disability permanent in nature resulting from a service-connected disability or the spouse of a veteran who died while a disability so evaluated was in existence.
*Employment service delivery system,* as defined at 38 U.S.C. 4101(7), means a service delivery system at which or through which labor exchange services, including employment, training, and placement services, are offered in accordance with the Wagner-Peyser Act.
*Jobs for Veterans Act (JVA)* means Public Law 107-288, 116 Stat. 2033 (2002), codified at 38 U.S.C. chapters 41 and 42.
*Jobs for Veterans State Grant (JVSG)* means an award of Federal financial assistance by the Department to a State for the purposes of the Disabled Veterans' Outreach Program or the Local Veterans' Employment Representative Program.
*Program year* is the period from July 1 of a year through June 30 of the following year and is numbered according to the calendar year in which it begins.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY HIGH

 617

 640

 596

 569

 592

 581

 601

 605

 589

 574

 542

 591

 612

 588

 571

 597

 562

 540

 555

 562

 588

 585

 584

 581

 568

 578

 578

 593

 591

 594

 645

 548

 519

 504

 476

 446

 476

 503

 507

 503

 505

 467

 493

 518

 479

 482

 466

 454

 455

 490

 493

 520

 549

 528

 508

 512

 540

 511

 524

 561

 564

 601

 582

 567

 544

 514

 499

 521

 534

 537

 531

 537

 508

 543

 564

 521

 511

 511

 482

 490

 522

 531

 558

 567

 557

 539

 532

 561

 551

 567

 575

 577

 628

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

MAY 2009 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: June 2, 2009

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

DELTA MENDOTA CANAL AT CHECK 13 (O'NEILL)
A-AA+Skip to content

                  - Home
                  - Compendium Statistics
                  - Event
                  - Archives
                  - Glossary
                  - Help
                  - Contact
                  - Research on Disability

Annual Disability Statistics Compendium

              - Home /
              - Archives /
              - 2012 Compendium Statistics /
              - 2012 Social Security Administration Programs /
              - 2012 9.4 Supplemental Security Income—Number of Recipients of Federally Administered Payments, by Age

## Table 9.4: Supplemental Security Income—Number of Recipients of Federally Administered Payments, by Age: December 2010

----

----

 

----

#### 2012 Disability Compendium

                        - Home
                        - Compendium Statistics                           - Population and Prevelance
                          - Employment
                          - Time Trend Population Statistics
                          - Poverty
                          - Earnings
                          - Veterans
                          - Health Insurance Coverage
                          - Health
                          - Social Security Administration Programs
                          - Medicaid and Medicare
                          - Special Education
                          - Vocational Rehabilitation
                          - Federal Government Spending and Employment
                          - International Disability Statistics
                          - Population Statistics: Disability Type
                        - Event
                        - Archives                           - 2012 Compendium Statistics
                        - Glossary
                        - Help
                        - Contact
                        - Research on Disability

#### Funding for this project is made possible by:

 The Research and Training Center on Disability Statistics and Demographics (StatsRRTC), which is funded by the U.S. Department of Education, National Institute for Disability and Rehabilitation Research, under cooperative agreements H133B080012.

#### Stay Connected

**Institute on Disability**10 West Edge Drive, Suite 101Durham, NH 03824603.862.4320 | relay: 711 | [email protected]www.iod.unh.edu

© 2013. Institute on Disability.University of New Hampshire.
Editorial Note on Part 46
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 46 appear by T.D. ATF-457, 66 FR 32220, 32221, June 14, 2001.

§ 46.3 Applicability to certain credits or refunds. The provisions of this subpart apply only where the credit or refund is claimed on the grounds that an amount of tax was assessed or collected erroneously, illegally, without authority, or in any manner wrongfully, or on the grounds that such amount was excessive. This subpart does not apply to: ( a ) Any claim for drawback,
( b ) Any claim made in accordance with any law expressly providing for credit or refund where an article is withdrawn from the market, returned to bond, lost, or destroyed, and
( c ) Any claim based solely on errors in computation of the quantity of an article subject to tax or on mathematical errors in computation of the amount of the tax due, or to any claim in respect of tax collected or paid on an article seized and forfeited, or destroyed, as contraband.
[T.D. 6395, 24 FR 599, Jan. 28, 1959. Redesignated at 40 FR 16835, Apr. 15, 1975, and amended by T.D. ATF-42, 42 FR 8372, Feb. 10, 1977]
Exhibit 32.1

                      Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
                             As Adopted Pursuant to Section 906
                              Of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

      In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Presidential
Realty Corporation (the "Company") for the period ending September 30, 2009, as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
"Report"), I, Jeffrey F. Joseph, Chief Executive Officer of the Company,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:

         (1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)or
             15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934: and

         (2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
             material respects, the financial condition and the results of
             operations of the Company.



                                     Presidential Realty Corporation

                                     By:/s/ Jeffrey F. Joseph
                                     --------------------------
                                     Jeffrey F. Joseph
                                     Chief Executive Officer




         Date: November 10, 2009
#### Ralph Molinari, Appellant, v. Beatrice Wiley et al., Respondents.

In an action to recover damages for injuries from the hites of a dog, judgment entered in favor of defendants, after trial by the court, without a jury, and order denying plaintiffs motion to set aside the judgment, for a new trial, to make additions to the stenographer’s minutes, etc., unanimously affirmed, with costs. Ho opinion. Present — Lewis, P. J., Carswell, Johnston, Adel and Sneed, JJ.
Editorial Note on Part 25
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 25 appear by T.D. ATF-437, 66 FR 5478, 5479, Jan. 19, 2001.

§ 25.192 Removal of sour or damaged beer. ( a ) *Containers.* The brewer shall remove sour or damaged beer ( 1 ) in casks or other packages, containing not less than one barrel each and unlike those ordinarily used for packaging beer, or
( 2 ) in tanks, tank cars, tank trucks, tank ships, barges, or deep tanks of a vessel. The brewer shall mark the nature of the contents on each container.
( b ) *Beer meter.* The brewer shall remove sour or damaged beer without passing it through the meter (if any) or racking machine.
( c ) *Records and reports.* The brewer shall record the removal of sour or damaged beer in daily records under § 25.292 and on the Brewer's Report of Operations, Form 5130.9.
(Sec. 201, Pub. L. 85-859, 72 Stat. 1334, as amended (26 U.S.C. 5033))
[T.D. ATF-224, 51 FR 7673, Mar. 5, 1986, as amended by T.D. ATF-345, 58 FR 40357, July 28, 1993]
EXHIBIT 31.2

Rule 13a-14 Certification 

I, Kenneth L. Buckler, Chief Financial Officer of Capital Builders, Inc., certify that:

1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of Capital Builders Development Properties II (the "Registrant").

2. Based on my knowledge, this annual report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this annual report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this annual report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. The registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this annual report is being prepared;

b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting; and

5. The registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

- All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal controls over financial reporting which were reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial data; and 
- Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting. 

 

March 26, 2004

 

_________________________________

Kenneth L. Buckler

Chief Financial Officer
**Exhibit 33.1**

 

**CERTIFICATION**

 

I, C. E. Andrews, certifythat:

 

1.             I have reviewed this annual reporton Form 10-K, and all reports on Form 8-K containing distribution orservicing reports filed in respect of periods included in the year covered bythis annual report, of SLM Private Credit Student Loan Trust 2005-A;

 

2.             Based on my knowledge, theinformation in these reports, taken as a whole, does not contain any untruestatement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to makethe statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statementswere made, not misleading as of the last day of the period covered by thisannual report;

 

3.             Based on my knowledge, thedistribution or servicing information required to be provided to the trustee bythe servicer under the pooling and servicing, or similar, agreement, forinclusion in these reports is included in these reports;

 

4.             Based on my knowledge and upon theannual compliance statement included in the report and required to be deliveredto the trustee in accordance with the terms of the pooling and servicing, orsimilar, agreement, and except as disclosed in the reports, the servicer hasfulfilled its obligations under the servicing agreement; and

 

5.             The reports disclose all significantdeficiencies relating to the servicer’s compliance with the minimum servicingstandards based upon the report provided by an independent public accountant,after conducting a review in compliance with the Uniform Single AttestationProgram for Mortgage Bankers or similar procedures, as set forth in the poolingand servicing, or similar, agreement, that is included in these reports.

 

Date: March 31, 2006

 

/s/ C.E. ANDREWSC.E. AndrewsPresident and Chief Financial OfficerSLM Education Credit Funding LLC,as the Depositor for SLM Private Credit Student Loan Trust 2005-A

 

----
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

DAY ELEV

 123.94

 123.76

 123.53

 123.41

 123.61

 123.52

 123.31

 123.26

 122.73

 122.98

 123.35

 123.12

 123.09

 123.25

 123.42

 123.56

 123.65

 124.09

 123.83

 123.53

 123.49

 123.83

 124.14

 124.18

 124.25

 124.28

 124.10

 123.92

 124.22

 124.31

 8,233

 8,148

 8,040

 7,984

 8,078

 8,035

 7,937

 7,913

 7,670

 7,782

 7,956

 7,847

 7,833

 7,909

 7,988

 8,054

 8,097

 8,306

 8,181

 8,040

 8,021

 8,181

 8,331

 8,351

 8,386

 8,401

 8,311

 8,223

 8,371

 8,416

STORAGE

+183

-85

-108

-56

+94

-43

-98

-24

-243

+112

+174

-109

-14

+76

+79

+66

+43

+209

-125

-141

-19

+160

+150

+20

+35

+15

-90

-88

+148

+45

CHANGE

2,629

2,446

2,414

2,526

2,622

2,420

2,476

2,524

2,396

2,501

2,533

2,396

2,429

2,493

2,475

2,470

2,465

2,555

2,371

2,384

2,432

2,314

2,280

2,207

2,224

2,204

2,144

2,152

2,266

2,221

INFLOW

 2,441

 2,392

 2,375

 2,463

 2,484

 2,347

 2,434

 2,446

 2,428

 2,354

 2,354

 2,360

 2,345

 2,364

 2,344

 2,347

 2,352

 2,359

 2,344

 2,364

 2,351

 2,142

 2,113

 2,107

 2,119

 2,111

 2,104

 2,111

 2,106

 2,112

POWER

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

SPILL

 60

 60

 60

 60

 60

 63

 60

 60

 60

 60

 60

 60

 60

 60

 60

 60

 60

 60

 60

 60

 60

 60

 60

 60

 60

 60

 60

 60

 60

 60

HATCHERY

 1

 2

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 0

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 0

 1

 1

 0

 1

 1

 1

 1

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 1

C.F.S.

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

NOVEMBER 2011 LAKE NATOMA DAILY OPERATIONS RUN DATE: December 1, 2011

IN LAKE

EVAP

C.F.S.

COMPUTED*

ACRE-FEET

RELEASE - C.F.S.

TOTALS +366 71,969 69,073 0 1,803 22

ACRE-FEET +366 142,751 137,006 0 3,576 44

COMMENTS:

* COMPUTED INFLOW IS THE SUM OF CHANGE IN STORAGE, RELEASES AND EVAPORATION.

SUMMARY

RELEASES (ACRE-FEET)

POWER 137,006

SPILL 0

FOLSOM SOUTH CANAL

HATCHERY

 1,755

 3,576

 8,050

FOLSOM

SOUTH 

CANAL

 35

 35

 32

 30

 30

 31

 30

 30

 30

 30

 30

 30

 30

 30

 30

 30

 30

 30

 30

 30

 30

 30

 30

 30

 27

 25

 25

 25

 25

 25

 885

 1,755

(1)

(1) INCHES OF EVAPORATION TAKEN FROM FOLSOM PAN.

RELEASES (ACRE-FEET)

TOTAL 142,337
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

DAY HIGH

 7,280

 5,139

 7,567

 7,107

 4,518

 4,562

 5,045

 7,659

 9,775

 13,142

 11,102

 10,705

 9,626

 4,096

 2,505

 2,438

 3,248

 4,842

 5,545

 5,940

 8,519

 10,681

 12,836

 10,962

 9,138

 11,635

 5,540

 5,842

 12,484

 11,765

 329

 298

 351

 399

 303

 307

 381

 457

 500

 456

 661

 506

 569

 320

 283

 264

 261

 257

 265

 295

 325

 486

 652

 449

 370

 416

 282

 267

 297

 508

 3,809

 1,866

 2,523

 2,372

 1,558

 1,386

 1,637

 2,630

 3,430

 4,771

 4,410

 4,174

 4,138

 1,819

 895

 675

 779

 1,233

 1,327

 1,652

 2,836

 4,081

 4,779

 3,597

 3,155

 3,960

 1,806

 1,948

 5,067

 6,223

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

APRIL 2012 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: June 5, 2012

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

PORT CHICAGO BOTTOM IN SUISUN BAY
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Audomar GARCIA-GUERRERO, also known as Jose Esquivel, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 05-51118.

Conference Calendar.

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.

Decided Feb. 24, 2006.

Joseph H. Gay, Jr., Assistant U.S. Attorney, U.S. Attorney’s Office, Western District of Texas, San Antonio, TX, for Plaintiff-Appellee.

Donna F. Coltharp, Federal Public Defender’s Office, Western District of Texas, San Antonio, TX, for Defendant-Appellant.

Before GARZA, DENNIS, and PRADO, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: *

Appealing the Judgment in a Criminal Case, Audomar Garcia-Guerrero raises arguments that are foreclosed by *Almendarez-Torres v. United States,*523 U.S. 224, 235, 118 S.Ct. 1219, 140 L.Ed.2d 350 (1998), which held that a prior conviction is a sentencing factor under 8 U.S.C. § 1326(b)(2) and not a separate criminal offense. The Government’s motion for summary affirmance is GRANTED, and the judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.

*

 Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.
### §§5931 to 5939. Repealed. Pub. L. 103–227, title V, §509(a), Mar. 31, 1994, 108 Stat. 200

Section 5931, Pub. L. 103–227, title V, §501, Mar. 31, 1994, 108 Stat. 191, set forth short title of subchapter as National Skill Standards Act of 1994.

Section 5932, Pub. L. 103–227, title V, §502, Mar. 31, 1994, 108 Stat. 191, stated purpose of subchapter.

Section 5933, Pub. L. 103–227, title V, §503, Mar. 31, 1994, 108 Stat. 192; Pub. L. 104–134, title I, §101(d) [title VII, §703(a)(17)], Apr. 26, 1996, 110 Stat. 1321–211, 1321–254; renumbered title I, Pub. L. 104–140, §1(a), May 2, 1996, 110 Stat. 1327, established National Skill Standards Board.

Section 5934, Pub. L. 103–227, title V, §504, Mar. 31, 1994, 108 Stat. 195; Pub. L. 104–134, title I, §101(d) [title VII, §703(a)(18)], Apr. 26, 1996, 110 Stat. 1321–211, 1321–254; renumbered title I, Pub. L. 104–140, §1(a), May 2, 1996, 110 Stat. 1327; Pub. L. 105–277, div. A, §101(f) [title VIII, §405(d)(17)(A)], Oct. 21, 1998, 112 Stat. 2681–337, 2681–422, related to functions of National Skill Standards Board.

Section 5935, Pub. L. 103–227, title V, §505, Mar. 31, 1994, 108 Stat. 199, related to deadline for identifying occupational clusters and promoting development of skill standards for the clusters.

Section 5936, Pub. L. 103–227, title V, §506, Mar. 31, 1994, 108 Stat. 199, related to reports to the President and Congress.

Section 5937, Pub. L. 103–227, title V, §507, Mar. 31, 1994, 108 Stat. 199, authorized appropriations.

Section 5938, Pub. L. 103–227, title V, §508, Mar. 31, 1994, 108 Stat. 200; Pub. L. 105–277, div. A, §101(f) [title VIII, §405(d)(17)(B)], Oct. 21, 1998, 112 Stat. 2681–337, 2681–422, related to definitions for subchapter.

Section 5939, Pub. L. 103–227, title V, §509, Mar. 31, 1994, 108 Stat. 200, repealed this subchapter effective Sept. 30, 1999.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date of Repeal

Repeal effective Sept. 30, 1999, see section 509(a) of Pub. L. 103–227, which was formerly classified to section 5939(a) of this title.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

DAY HIGH

 764

 832

 846

 855

 711

 839

 838

 802

 676

 668

 688

 683

 850

 845

 839

 868

 861

 867

 861

 858

 863

 817

 732

 616

 726

 708

 866

 911

 928

 598

 611

 618

 613

 606

 601

 601

 593

 602

 571

 614

 612

 607

 628

 663

 601

 572

 556

 543

 538

 537

 539

 528

 511

 566

 543

 580

 693

 627

 658

 677

 685

 688

 629

 683

 665

 650

 633

 606

 653

 648

 686

 737

 759

 742

 674

 669

 688

 682

 688

 609

 643

 572

 631

 638

 666

 804

 782

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

FEBRUARY 2012 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: March 13, 2012

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

DELTA MENDOTA CANAL AT CHECK 13 (O'NEILL)
#### In the Matter of the Claim of Charles B. McKay, Respondent, against Perma Maid Company, Inc., et al., Appellants. State Industrial Board, Respondent.

All concur.
### §130a. Financial and program audit by Secretary

Funds appropriated in this Act or subsequent Departments of Labor, Health and Human Services, and Education, and Related Agencies Appropriations Acts to Howard University shall be subject to financial and program audit by the Secretary of Education and the Secretary may withhold all or any portion of these appropriations if he determines that an institution has not cooperated fully in the conduct of such audits.

(Pub. L. 102–394, title III, §301, Oct. 6, 1992, 106 Stat. 1819.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section is from the Departments of Labor, Health and Human Services, and Education, and Related Agencies Appropriations Act, 1993, and contained additional provisions relating to the American Printing House for the Blind, Gallaudet University, and the National Technical Institute for the Deaf, which are set out as sections 106a and 4363 of this title, respectively.
§ 8.54 Criteria for determining retailer independence. The criteria specified in this section are indications that a particular practice, other than those in §§ 8.52 and 8.53, places retailer independence at risk. A practice need not meet all of the criteria specified in this section in order to place retailer independence at risk. ( a ) The practice restricts or hampers the free economic choice of a retailer to decide which products to purchase or the quantity in which to purchase them for sale to consumers.
( b ) The industry member obligates the retailer to participate in the promotion to obtain the industry member's product.
( c ) The retailer has a continuing obligation to purchase or otherwise promote the industry member's product.
( d ) The retailer has a commitment not to terminate its relationship with the industry member with respect to purchase of the industry member's products.
( e ) The practice involves the industry member in the day-to-day operations of the retailer. For example, the industry member controls the retailer's decisions on which brand of products to purchase, the pricing of products, or the manner in which the products will be displayed on the retailer's premises.
( f ) The practice is discriminatory in that it is not offered to all retailers in the local market on the same terms without business reasons present to justify the difference in treatment.