1 Jo hn T. Boy d, Chief Justice (Ret.), S eventh Cour t of Appeals, sit

ting by assignment. Tex. Gov’ t Code Ann. §75.002( a)(1) (Vernon Supp. 2003). NO. 07-02-0404-CR IN THE COUR

T OF APPEALS FOR THE SEVEN TH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

AT AMARILLO PANEL E OCTOBER 29, 2003

______________________________ MARY ELIZABETH ALLEN W ILSON, APPELLANT V. THE STATE OF TEXAS, A PPELLEE

_________________________________ FROM THE 64 TH DISTRIC T COURT O F HALE COUN TY; NO. A13156-9808; H ONORABLE JAC K R. MILLER, JUDGE

_______________________________ Before QUINN and REAVIS, JJ., an d BOYD, S.J. 1 Memorandum Opinion
On August 21 , 1998, upon her gu ilty pl ea and pursuant to a plea agreement , appellant

Mary El izabeth All en Wilson was convi cted of the offens e of driving while intoxicated 3 rd off

ense or more . In accordance with the plea bargai n, her sentence w as2

assessed at five years confinement in the Ins titutional D ivisio n of the Department of Criminal Justice and a fine of $1,00 0, probated under com munity supervision for a period of five years. On Octob er 3, 200 2, aft er hearin g, and upon appellant’ s plea of true to t he allegations

contained in asecond motion torevoke, ap pellant’s pr obation was revoked and her sent ence asse ssed at f ive y ears confinement in the Institutio nal Divi sion of the Department of Cri minal Justice and a $1,000 fine. Appellant’s appointed appella te attorney has filed an Anders brief. See Anders v. California , 386 U.S. 738, 744-45, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967)

. In his bri ef, h e certifies that after careful examination of the reco rd, he has concluded that a ppellant’s appeal is wi thout merit. In that brief, he certifies that he has sent a copy of the br ief to appellant

and has expl ained her ri ght to file a pr o se brief

if she so desires. He has also filed a motion to w ithdraw a s appellate counsel and cer tifies that he hassent a copy of this motion to appellant. The clerk ofthis court has al so notified appell ant of her right to file a brief and that she had until June 27, 2003, within which to file such a brief. A ppellant has not exercised her right to file a pro se brief, nor has she requested any extension of time within w hich to do so.
In consideri ng briefs and r equests of this

type, we must first satisfy our selves tha t the appe llate atto rney has pr ovided the c lient wi th a dilig ent and thorough search of the record for any arg uable claim that might suppor

t his clie nt’s appeal. Then, after determining those matters, we must cons ider counsel’s brief and decide if he has correctly concluded the appeal is fr ivolous. McCoy v. Court of Appeals of Wisconsin , 486 U.S. 429,3

108 S.Ct. 1895, 100 L.Ed.2d 440 (1988) ; High v. State, 573 S.W.2d 807, 813 (Te x. C rim. App. 1978).
When we rev iew an or

der revok ing probation, the o nly ques tion before us is whethe r the trial cour

t abused its di scretion in doing so. Jackso n v. State , 645 S.W.2d 303, 305 (Tex. Crim. App. 1983) . In a revocation proceedi ng, the State mus t prove by a preponderance of the evidence that the probatio ner violated a condition of the probation. Cobb v. State , 851 S.W.2d 871, 874 (Tex. Cri m. App. 1993). Al though one sufficient ground for revocat ion supports a revocatio n order, Moore v. State , 605 S.W.2d 924, 926 (Tex. Crim

. App. 1979), a pl ea of true standing alone is sufficient to sup port the trial court’s revocatio n order. Moore v. Stat e , 590 S.W .2d 469, 470 (Tex. Crim. App. 19 79).
Atthe hearing on the motion to r evoke, ap pel lant entered a pl ea of true to the allegations

in t he motion to revoke. Thi s in itsel f is sufficient to s upport the revocation order. Appellant w

as also sw

orn and testified. We have carefully examined the recor d of the revocati on hearing. We can only conclude that appellatecounsel is correct in his brief and that the tri al court did not abuse its di scretion in revoking appellant’s p robation.
Acco rdin gly, the judgment of the trial cour t is affirmed an d appellate counsel’s motion to wi thdraw is

granted.
John T. Bo yd Senior Justice Do not publish

.