alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY ELEV

 122.23

 122.13

 122.00

 122.24

 122.66

 122.70

 123.41

 123.30

 122.89

 122.44

 122.44

 122.87

 122.88

 122.98

 123.10

 123.06

 123.45

 123.98

 124.28

 124.04

 124.17

 123.49

 123.43

 123.40

 123.35

 123.37

 123.15

 123.06

 122.94

 122.61

 122.52

 7,445

 7,400

 7,341

 7,449

 7,638

 7,656

 7,984

 7,932

 7,742

 7,539

 7,539

 7,733

 7,737

 7,782

 7,838

 7,819

 8,003

 8,252

 8,401

 8,281

 8,346

 8,021

 7,993

 7,979

 7,956

 7,965

 7,862

 7,819

 7,764

 7,616

 7,575

STORAGE

+104

-45

-59

+108

+189

+18

+328

-52

-190

-203

+0

+194

+4

+45

+56

-19

+184

+249

+149

-120

+65

-325

-28

-14

-23

+9

-103

-43

-55

-148

-41

CHANGE

1,332

1,255

1,245

1,334

1,388

1,307

1,477

1,281

1,210

1,187

1,277

1,382

1,292

1,315

1,321

1,285

1,291

1,315

1,256

1,121

1,217

1,029

1,170

1,188

1,169

1,186

1,142

1,147

1,140

1,104

1,154

INFLOW

 257

 257

 258

 256

 257

 256

 255

 254

 257

 258

 258

 258

 258

 260

 257

 257

 250

 257

 255

 247

 241

 239

 242

 242

 242

 243

 649

 1,079

 1,078

 1,089

 1,088

POWER

 927

 925

 921

 928

 941

 947

 968

 968

 962

 945

 932

 934

 936

 936

 940

 943

 855

 856

 866

 874

 868

 866

 851

 862

 848

 847

 455

 0

 0

 0

 0

SPILL

 60

 60

 60

 60

 60

 60

 60

 60

 60

 60

 60

 60

 60

 60

 60

 60

 60

 60

 60

 60

 60

 60

 60

 60

 60

 60

 60

 60

 60

 60

 60

HATCHERY

 1

 1

 1

 1

 0

 0

 0

 0

 2

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 1

 0

 1

 1

 1

 1

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

C.F.S.

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

DECEMBER 2007 LAKE NATOMA DAILY OPERATIONS RUN DATE: February 14, 2008

IN LAKE

EVAP

C.F.S.

COMPUTED*

ACRE-FEET

RELEASE - C.F.S.

TOTALS +234 38,517 11,554 24,101 1,860 17

ACRE-FEET +234 76,398 22,917 47,804 3,689 34

COMMENTS:

* COMPUTED INFLOW IS THE SUM OF CHANGE IN STORAGE, RELEASES AND EVAPORATION.

SUMMARY

RELEASES (ACRE-FEET)

POWER 22,917

SPILL 47,804

FOLSOM SOUTH CANAL

HATCHERY

 1,724

 3,689

 7,341

FOLSOM

SOUTH 

 35

 35

 35

 35

 35

 35

 29

 25

 25

 25

 26

 31

 35

 35

 35

 35

 33

 16

 0

 0

 14

 28

 30

 30

 30

 30

 30

 30

 30

 30

 27

 869

 1,724

(1)

(1) INCHES OF EVAPORATION TAKEN FROM FOLSOM PAN.

RELEASES (ACRE-FEET) 

TOTAL 76,134

Table 12
Exhibit
32.2





CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Annual Report of
SRKP 2, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31,
2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof
(the "Report"), I, Anthony C. Pintsopoulos, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss.
1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to
my knowledge:





(1) The
Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2) The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





/s/
      Anthony C. PintsopoulosAnthony
      C. Pintsopoulos
                      Principal
      Financial Officer
                      March
      23, 2010
(No. 6460

#### Chas. Todd, Inc., Claimant, *vs.*State of Illinois, Various Agencies, Respondent.

*Opinion filed February 9, 1973.*

Chas. Todd, Inc., Claimant, pro se.

William J. Scott, Attorney General; William E. Webber, Assistant Attorney General, for Respondent.

Per Curiam.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

DAY ELEV

 122.71

 123.58

 123.53

 123.45

 123.42

 123.15

 122.92

 124.22

 124.20

 124.26

 124.42

 124.30

 123.80

 123.71

 123.90

 123.93

 124.12

 124.19

 124.15

 123.98

 124.23

 124.22

 124.16

 123.87

 123.74

 123.72

 123.69

 124.04

 124.23

 124.32

 7,661

 8,064

 8,040

 8,003

 7,988

 7,862

 7,755

 8,371

 8,361

 8,391

 8,471

 8,411

 8,167

 8,125

 8,214

 8,228

 8,321

 8,356

 8,336

 8,252

 8,376

 8,371

 8,341

 8,200

 8,139

 8,129

 8,115

 8,281

 8,376

 8,421

STORAGE

-238

+403

-24

-37

-15

-126

-107

+616

-10

+30

+80

-60

-244

-42

+89

+14

+93

+35

-20

-84

+124

-5

-30

-141

-61

-10

-14

+166

+95

+45

CHANGE

2,930

3,167

2,984

3,224

3,329

3,283

3,285

3,642

3,941

4,037

4,022

3,998

3,906

4,023

4,075

4,034

4,077

4,062

4,036

3,995

4,100

4,045

3,632

3,478

3,526

3,542

3,530

3,626

3,598

3,561

INFLOW

 2,945

 2,861

 2,893

 3,143

 3,235

 3,246

 3,234

 3,230

 3,847

 3,927

 3,887

 3,931

 3,929

 3,932

 3,935

 3,932

 3,935

 3,946

 3,946

 3,934

 3,935

 3,945

 3,545

 3,446

 3,454

 3,444

 3,437

 3,441

 3,448

 3,437

POWER

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

SPILL

 60

 60

 60

 59

 60

 60

 60

 60

 60

 60

 59

 60

 60

 60

 60

 60

 60

 60

 60

 60

 60

 60

 60

 60

 60

 60

 60

 60

 60

 60

HATCHERY

 5

 3

 3

 2

 2

 1

 5

 3

 4

 0

 2

 2

 5

 12

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 3

 2

 3

 2

 3

 3

 3

 0

 1

 2

 1

C.F.S.

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

APRIL 2002 LAKE NATOMA DAILY OPERATIONS RUN DATE: May 22, 2002

IN LAKE

EVAP

C.F.S.

COMPUTED*

ACRE-FEET

RELEASE - C.F.S.

TOTALS +522 110,688 107,400 0 1,798 72

ACRE-FEET +522 219,550 213,028 0 3,566 143

COMMENTS:

* COMPUTED INFLOW IS THE SUM OF CHANGE IN STORAGE, RELEASES AND EVAPORATION.

SUMMARY

RELEASES (ACRE-FEET)

POWER 213,028

SPILL 0

FOLSOM SOUTH CANAL

HATCHERY

 2,289

 3,566

 7,899

FOLSOM

SOUTH 

CANAL

 40

 40

 40

 39

 40

 40

 40

 38

 35

 35

 34

 35

 35

 40

 35

 35

 35

 38

 40

 40

 40

 40

 40

 40

 40

 40

 40

 40

 40

 40

 1,154

 2,289

(1)

(1) INCHES OF EVAPORATION TAKEN FROM FOLSOM PAN.

RELEASES (ACRE-FEET)

TOTAL 218,883

Table 12
#### Michelle GOODEN, Petitioner, v. OFFICE OF PERSONNEL MANAGEMENT, Respondent.

No. 2005-3254.

United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit.

June 22, 2006.

*ORDER*

Michelle Gooden moves without opposition for reconsideration of the court’s May 31, 2006 order dismissing her petition for review for failure to file the appendix and for leave to file the appendix out of time.

Gooden submits the appendix.

Upon consideration thereof,

IT IS ORDERED THAT:

The motions are granted, the dismissal order is vacated, and the mandate is recalled.
Editorial Note on Part 22
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 22 appear by T.D. ATF-435, 66 FR 5476, Jan. 19, 2001 and T.D. ATF-463 and T.D. ATF-462, 66 FR 42733, 42736, Aug. 15, 2001.

§ 22.101 Authorized uses. Alcohol may be withdrawn free of tax from the bonded premises of a distilled spirits plant for the use of any State or political subdivision of a State, or the District of Columbia, for nonbeverage purposes. Alcohol may also be withdrawn by persons eligible to use tax-free alcohol, for nonbeverage purposes and not for resale or use in the manufacture of any product for sale. Tax-free alcohol shall be withdrawn and used only as provided by law and this part, as follows: ( a ) For the use of any educational organization described in 26 U.S.C. 170(b)(1)(A) which is exempt from income tax under 26 U.S.C. 501(a), or for the use of any scientific university or college of learning;
( b ) For any laboratory for use exclusively in scientific research;
( c ) For use at any hospital, blood bank, or sanitarium (including use in making any analysis or test at a hospital, blood bank, or sanitarium), or at any pathological laboratory exclusively engage in making analyses, or test, for hospitals or sanitariums; or
( d ) For the use of any clinic operated for charity and not for profit (including use in the compounding of bona fide medicines for treatment of patients outside of the clinic).
(Sec. 201, Pub. L. 85-859, 72 Stat. 1362, as amended, (26 U.S.C. 5214))
United States Court of Appeals

For the Eighth Circuit

___________________________

No. 18-1137

___________________________

United States of America

lllllllllllllllllllllPlaintiff - Appellee

v.

John Donald Kelso

lllllllllllllllllllllDefendant - Appellant

____________

Appeal from United States District Court 

for the Western District of Missouri - Springfield

____________

Submitted: January 7, 2019

Filed: January 10, 2019

[Unpublished]

____________

Before BENTON, BOWMAN, and STRAS, Circuit Judges. 

____________

PER CURIAM.
John Donald Kelso appeals the district court’s order committing him to the

1

custody of the Attorney General for hospitalization under 18 U.S.C. § 4246. Having

jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291, this court affirms. 

After a hearing, the district court found by clear and convincing evidence that

Kelso wassuffering froma mental disease or defectsuch that his release would create

a substantial risk of bodily injury to another person orserious damage to the property

of another. See 18 U.S.C. § 4246. This court concludes the decision was not clearly

erroneous. See United States v. Williams, 299 F.3d 673, 676-78 (8th Cir. 2002)

(standard of review). 

The commitment order is supported by medical opinions set forth in reports

prepared by mental health professionals where Kelso is presently confined for

treatment, and bydefense counsel’s independent psychological examiner. The reports

noted that Kelso lacked insight into his medical condition, had a history of irregular

medication compliance as well as psychotic and aggressive behaviors, and engaged

in antisocial acts when released. These reports conclude there is a clear nexus

between Kelso’s mental illness and his aggressive behaviors, and that he suffers from

a serious mental illness such that he meets the criteria for section 4246 commitment. 

See United States v. Ecker, 30 F.3d 966, 970 (8th Cir. 1994) (factors in determining

potential dangerousness). 

This court notes that the Attorney General is under a continuing obligation to

exert reasonable efforts to place Kelso in a suitable state facility, and that Kelso’s

custodians must prepare annual reports concerning his mental condition and the need

for continued commitment. See 18 U.S.C. §§ 4246(d) and 4247(e)(1)(B). 

The Honorable M. Douglas Harpool, United States District Judge for the

1

Western District of Missouri, adopting the report and recommendations of the

Honorable David P. Rush, United States Magistrate Judge for the Western District of

Missouri.

-2-
 

The judgment is affirmed. Counsel’s motion to withdraw is granted.

______________________________

-3-
EXHIBIT 23.1
                    PRIME CAPITAL CORPORATION


                CONSENT OF KPMG PEAT MARWICK LLP



The Board of Directors and Stockholders
Prime Capital Corporation:

We  consent  to  incorporation by reference in  the  registration
statement   (No.  333-43103)  on  Form  S-8  of   Prime   Capital
Corporation  of our report dated March 27, 1998 relating  to  the
consolidated  balance  sheets of Prime  Capital  Corporation  and
subsidiaries  as  of December 31, 1997 and 1996 and  the  related
consolidated statements of operations, stockholders' equity,  and
cash  flows for each of the years in the three-year period  ended
December 31, 1997, which report appears in the December 31,  1997
annual report on Form 10-KSB of Prime Capital Corporation.



KPMG PEAT MARWICK LLP


Chicago, Illinois

March 31, 1998
EXHIBIT 12.1

**Form 10-QPACCAR Financial Corp.**

**COMPUTATIONOF RATIO OF EARNINGS TO FIXED CHARGES**

**PURSUANT TO SEC REPORTING REQUIREMENTS****(Millions of Dollars)**

|                                                                    | Three Months Ended |
|-------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------------------|
|                                                                    | March 31,          |
|                                                                    | **2001******       | 2000 |
|                                                                    | (Unaudited)        |
|    FIXED CHARGES                                              |               |   |
|        Interest expense                   | **$49.3**          | $44.4 |
|        Portion of rentals deemed interest | **.3******         | .3 |
|                                                                    |               |   |
|    TOTAL FIXED CHARGES                                        | **$49.6******      | $44.7 |
|                                                                    |               |   |
|    EARNINGS                                                   |               |   |
|        Income before taxes                | **$5.4**           | $14.8 |
|        Fixed charges                      | **49.6******       | 44.7 |
|                                                                    |               |   |
|    EARNINGS AS DEFINED                                        | **$55.0******      | $59.5 |
|                                                                    |               |   |
|    RATIO OF EARNINGS TO FIXED CHARGES                         | **1.11x**          | 1.33x |
**EXHIBIT 12.3**

 

#### **PACCARand Subsidiaries**

#### ** **

**COMPUTATION OF RATIO OF EARNINGS TO FIXED CHARGES**

 

**PURSUANT TO SEC REPORTING REQUIREMENTS**

(Millions of Dollars)

 
| ** **                                         | ** ** | **Six Months Ended   June 30** | ** ** |
|----------------------------------------------------|------------|-------------------------------------|------------|
| ** **                                         | ** ** | **2005**                            | ** ** | **2004** | ** ** |
|                                               |       |                                |       |   |   |
| FIXED CHARGES                                      |       |                                |       |   |   |
| Interest expense  - PACCAR and Subsidiaries (1)    | ** ** | **$**                               | **83.0**   |   | $ | 63.3 |   |
| Portion of  rentals deemed interest                | ** ** | **7.2**                             |       | 6.4 |   |
|                                               |       |                                |       |   |   |
| TOTAL FIXED  CHARGES                               | ** ** | **$**                               | **90.2**   |   | $ | 69.7 |   |
|                                               |       |                                |       |   |   |
| EARNINGS                                           |       |                                |       |   |   |
| Income before  taxes - PACCAR and Subsidiaries (2) | ** ** | **$**                               | **868.8**  |   | $ | 641.2 |   |
| Fixed charges                                      | ** ** | **90.2**                            |       | 69.7 |   |
|                                               |       |                                |       |   |   |
| EARNINGS AS  DEFINED                               | ** ** | **$**                               | **959.0**  |   | $ | 710.9 |   |
|                                               |       |                                |       |   |   |
| RATIO OF  EARNINGS TO FIXED CHARGES                | ** ** | **10.63**                           | **X**      | 10.20 | X |

 

----

(1)          Exclusiveof interest, if any, paid to PACCAR.

 

(2)          Includesbefore-tax earnings of wholly-owned subsidiaries.

 

1

----
#### § 31.138 Discontinuance of business.

A dealer going out of business must register that event within 30 days by filing a registration form, TTB Form 5630.5d, in accordance with instructions on the form.
### §48. Salary and removal of Secretary and assistants

The Secretary and his assistants shall, respectively, receive for their services such sum as may be allowed by the Board of Regents; and shall be removable by the Board of Regents whenever, in their judgment, the interests of the institution require such removal.

(R.S. §5584.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

R.S. §5584 derived from act Aug. 10, 1846, ch. 178, §7, 9 Stat. 105.

Provisions which related to semi-annual payments on the first day of January and July have been omitted.
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Bridget M. McCormack, Chief Justice

David F. Viviano,

Chief Justice Pro Tem

Stephen J. Markman

Brian K. Zahra

Richard H. Bernstein

Elizabeth T. Clement

Megan K. Cavanagh,

Justices

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

 May 6, 2020 p0429

Order 

Clerk

May 6, 2020

160339

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

v SC: 160339

COA: 327491

Wayne CC: 14-004600-FH

DARRELL WILDER, a/k/a DARRELL

JOHN WILDER, a/k/a DARRELL J. WILDER,

Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the August 13, 2019 

judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered. We direct the Clerk to schedule oral 

argument on the application. MCR 7.305(H)(1).

The appellant shall file a supplemental brief within 42 days of the date of this order 

addressing whether the harmless error test of People v Lukity, 460 Mich 484 (1999), should 

be refined or amended in all cases, see generally People v Parsley, 500 Mich 1033, 1033 

(2017) (LARSEN, J., concurring), or where the question turns on the evaluation of 

conflicting testimony at trial. In addition to the brief, the appellant shall electronically file 

an appendix conforming to MCR 7.312(D)(2). In the brief, citations to the record must 

provide the appendix page numbers as required by MCR 7.312(B)(1). The appellee shall 

file a supplemental brief within 21 days of being served with the appellant’s brief. The 

appellee shall also electronically file an appendix, or in the alternative, stipulate to the use 

of the appendix filed by the appellant. A reply, if any, must be filed by the appellant within 

14 days of being served with the appellee’s brief. The parties should not submit mere 

restatements of their application papers. 

The Prosecuting Attorneys Association of Michigan and the Criminal Defense 

Attorneys of Michigan are invited to file briefs amicus curiae. Other persons or groups 

interested in the determination of the issue presented in this case may move the Court for 

permission to file briefs amicus curiae.
### §3423. Repealed. Pub. L. 101–392, title VI, §602(a)(1), Sept. 25, 1990, 104 Stat. 840

Section, Pub. L. 96–88, title II, §213, Oct. 17, 1979, 93 Stat. 675, established the Intergovernmental Advisory Council on Education.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date of Repeal

Repeal effective July 1, 1991, see section 702(a) of Pub. L. 101–392, set out as an Effective Date note under section 3423a of this title.
#### Lottie Lindholm, Respondent, v. City of Buffalo, Appellant.

Judgment affirmed, with costs. All concurred.
Exhibit 32.1








CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER


PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002








The undersigned, Peter Wilson, the Chief Executive Officer and William Thomas, Chief Financial Officer of Morgan Creek Energy Corp., hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to their knowledge, the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Morgan Creek Energy Corp. for fiscal year ended December 31, 2010, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and that the information contained in the Annual Report on Form 10-K fairly presents in all material respects the financial condition and results of operations of Morgan Creek Energy Corp.








Date: March 31,  2011





/s/   Peter Wilson"Peter Wilson
President, Chief Executive Officer





/s/   "William Thomas"William Thomas
Chief Financial Officer, Principal Accounting Officer





A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signatures that appear in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to Morgan Creek Energy Corp. and will be retained by Morgan Creek Energy Corp. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
(No. 73—CC—88

#### Intoximeters, Inc., Claimant, *vs.*State of Illinois, Illinois State Police, Respondent.

*Opinion filed March*22, *1973.*

Intoximeters, Inc., Claimant, pro se.

William J. Scott, Attorney General; William E. Webber, Assistant Attorney General, for Respondent.

Per Curiam.
§ 9.25 San Pasqual Valley. ( a ) *Name.* The name of the viticultural area described in this section is “San Pasqual Valley.”
( b ) *Approved maps.* The appropriate maps for determining the boundaries are three U.S.G.S. maps. They are entitled: ( 1 ) “Escondido Quadrangle, California—San Diego County”, 7.5 minute series;
( 2 ) “San Pasqual Quadrangle, California—San Diego County”, 7.5 minute series;
( 3 ) “Valley Center Quadrangle, California—San Diego County”, 7.5 minute series.
( c ) *Boundaries.* The San Pasqual Valley viticultural area is located in San Diego County, California. ( 1 ) From the beginning point at the intersection of Interstate 15 and the 500-foot contour line, north of the intersection of point of Interstate 15 and T.12 S./T.13 S., the boundary line follows the 500-foot contour line to;
( 2 ) The point nearest San Pasqual Road and the 500-foot contour line, the boundary line follows the Escondido Corporate Boundary line to the 500-foot contour line on the hillock and circumnavigates said hillock back to the Escondido Corporate Boundary line and returns to the 500-foot contour line nearest to San Pasqual Road and;
( 3 ) Continues along the 500-foot contour line completely around San Pasqual Valley to a point where the 500-foot contour line intersects with Pomerado Road, at this point, the boundary line, in a straight, northwesterly direction crosses over to;
( 4 ) The 500-foot contour line of Battle Mountain, following the 500-foot contour line around Battle Mountain to point nearest to Interstate 15, at which point the boundary line crosses over to Interstate 15; and
( 5 ) Continues northward along Interstate 15 to the point of beginning.
[T.D. ATF-92, 46 FR 41493, Sept. 23, 1981]
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY HIGH

 22,307

 24,745

 25,098

 23,583

 23,056

 20,364

 17,704

 12,026

 8,823

 5,724

 3,585

 2,225

 1,029

 359

 273

 238

 217

 219

 221

 231

 226

 204

 193

 194

 195

 193

 200

 204

 205

 3,221

 8,410

 8,226

 9,557

 9,865

 10,369

 11,685

 9,160

 5,703

 1,785

 815

 653

 580

 368

 284

 246

 214

 174

 176

 181

 176

 172

 174

 163

 172

 170

 173

 172

 175

 184

 186

 189

 188

 14,321

 16,529

 17,582

 16,847

 17,554

 15,816

 12,775

 7,896

 4,671

 2,761

 1,779

 793

 449

 296

 241

 207

 188

 195

 193

 195

 197

 185

 182

 183

 183

 183

 188

 193

 196

 564

 1,547

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

MARCH 2016 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: April 12, 2016

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

PORT CHICAGO BOTTOM IN SUISUN BAY