alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[112th Congress Public Law 94]
[From the U.S. Government Printing Office]

[[Page 126 STAT. 10]]

Public Law 112-94
112th Congress

                                 An Act

 
   To redesignate the Noxubee National Wildlife Refuge as the Sam D. 
      Hamilton Noxubee National Wildlife Refuge. <<NOTE: Feb. 14, 
                          2012 -  [H.R. 588]>> 

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,
SECTION 1. REDESIGNATION OF THE NOXUBEE NATIONAL WILDLIFE REFUGE.

    (a) In General.--The Noxubee National Wildlife Refuge, located in 
the State of Mississippi, is redesignated as the ``Sam D. Hamilton 
Noxubee National Wildlife Refuge''.
    (b) Boundary Revision.--Nothing in this <<NOTE: 16 USC 668dd 
note.>> Act prevents the Secretary of the Interior from making 
adjustments to the boundaries of the Sam D. Hamilton Noxubee National 
Wildlife Refuge (referred to in this section as the ``Refuge''), as the 
Secretary determines to be appropriate, to carry out the mission of the 
National Wildlife Refuge System in accordance with the National Wildlife 
Refuge System Administration Act of 1966 (16 U.S.C. 668dd et seq.) and 
any other applicable authority.

    (c) Addition of Land.--Nothing in this Act prevents the Secretary of 
the Interior from adding to the Refuge new land or parcels of the 
National Wildlife Refuge System, as the Secretary determines to be 
appropriate, to carry out the mission of the National Wildlife Refuge 
System in accordance with the National Wildlife Refuge System 
Administration Act of 1966 (16 U.S.C. 668dd et seq.) and any other 
applicable authority.
    (d) References.--Any reference in any statute, rule, regulation, 
executive order, publication, map, paper, or other document of the 
United States to the Noxubee National Wildlife Refuge is deemed to refer 
to the Sam D. Hamilton Noxubee National Wildlife Refuge.

    Approved February 14, 2012.

LEGISLATIVE HISTORY--H.R. 588:
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

HOUSE REPORTS: No. 112-279 (Comm. on Natural Resources).
CONGRESSIONAL RECORD:
                                                        Vol. 157 (2011):
                                    Nov. 14, considered and passed 
                                        House.
                                                        Vol. 158 (2012):
                                    Feb. 1, considered and passed 
                                        Senate.

                                  <all>
```
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY

 25,045

 24,993

 24,958

 24,977

 24,921

 24,854

 24,731

 24,633

 24,460

 24,334

 24,147

 23,965

 23,820

 23,654

 23,475

 29,589

 23,243

 23,221

 23,106

 23,012

 22,870

 22,385

 22,034

 21,662

 21,203

 20,683

 20,182

 19,670

 19,176

 18,956

 18,761

 34,512

 33,738

 32,959

 32,205

 31,486

 30,747

 30,528

 30,309

 30,152

 29,945

 29,802

 29,660

 29,476

 29,453

 29,547

 23,365

 29,641

 29,589

 29,603

 29,622

 29,670

 30,066

 30,328

 30,618

 31,005

 31,448

 32,045

 32,657

 33,149

 33,316

 33,453

STORAGE - A.F. 

 59,557

 58,731

 57,917

 57,182

 56,407

 55,601

 55,259

 54,942

 54,612

 54,279

 53,949

 53,625

 53,296

 53,107

 53,022

 52,954

 52,884

 52,810

 52,709

 52,634

 52,540

 52,451

 52,362

 52,280

 52,208

 52,131

 52,227

 52,327

 52,325

 52,272

 52,214

713

608

659

754

772

14

419

429

446

439

224

461

370

447

292

316

244

378

320

208

280

380

295

352

459

306

1,761

2,640

1,389

574

502

299

192

249

383

381

-392

247

269

280

271

58

298

204

352

249

282

209

341

269

170

233

335

250

311

423

267

1,809

2,690

1,388

547

473

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

JANUARY 2021 FULL NATURAL FLOW AT NEW MELONES DAM RUN DATE: 02/02/2021

TOTALS -8,164 13,337

* October 1,

26,454

 54.5

 54.9

 55.4

 56.2

 56.9

 56.1

 56.6

 57.2

 57.7

 58.3

 58.4

 59.0

 59.4

 60.1

 60.6

 61.1

 61.5

 62.2

 62.8

 63.1

 63.6

 64.2

 64.7

 65.3

 66.2

 66.7

 70.3

 75.6

 78.4

 79.5

 80.4

DONNELLS

RES

BEARDSLEY

RES

2020 TO DATE

NEW

MELONES

INFLOW

C.F.S

NATURAL

RIVER

C.F.S

ACCUM *

FULL

NATURAL

1000 A.F.

RESERVOIR

TOTAL

-821

-826

-814

-735

-775

-806

-342

-317

-330

-333

-330

-324

-329

-189

-85

-68

-70

-74

-101

-75

-94

-89

-89

-82

-72

-77

+96

+100

-2

-53

-58

CHANGE

A.F. C.F.S.

-414

-416

-410

-371

-391

-406

-172

-160

-166

-168

-166

-163

-166

-95

-43

-34

-35

-37

-51

-38

-47

-45

-45

-41

-36

-39

+48

+50

-1

-27

-29

ACRE-FEET
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

DAY HIGH

 275

 295

 290

 279

 268

 266

 261

 253

 252

 242

 247

 246

 247

 246

 244

 257

 272

 267

 247

 243

 236

 228

 217

 205

 197

 184

 183

 173

 178

 245

 244

 241

 241

 242

 238

 237

 232

 229

 226

 225

 223

 223

 226

 228

 224

 228

 227

 228

 225

 219

 209

 197

 183

 178

 167

 159

 159

 153

 255

 262

 259

 253

 249

 247

 243

 240

 236

 233

 232

 231

 231

 234

 235

 235

 242

 240

 236

 235

 228

 219

 207

 197

 186

 177

 171

 166

 165

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

FEBRUARY 2004 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: March 10, 2004

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

14 DAY

ACCUM

MEAN

14 DAY

AVG

MEAN

 3,297

 3,334

 3,367

 3,394

 3,417

 3,437

 3,450

 3,458

 3,461

 3,458

 3,452

 3,442

 3,425

 3,405

 3,385

 3,358

 3,341

 3,328

 3,315

 3,303

 3,288

 3,267

 3,238

 3,202

 3,156

 3,102

 3,042

 2,974

 2,904

 236

 238

 241

 242

 244

 246

 246

 247

 247

 247

 247

 246

 245

 243

 242

 240

 239

 238

 237

 236

 235

 233

 231

 229

 225

 222

 217

 212

 207

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

JERSEY POINT TOP ON THE SAN JOAQUIN RIVER
#### Children’s Bus Service, Inc., Appellant, v. City of New York et al., Respondents.

(No. 936.) Motion for leave to appeal to the Court of Appeals denied. Defendants’ time to answer is extended until twenty days after the entry of the order hereon. (No. 937.) Motion for leave to appeal to the Court of Appeals denied. Present —■ Hagarty, Acting P. J., Carswell, Johnston, Adel and Sneed, JJ, [See 272 App. Div. 1058.]
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Marilyn Kelly,

 Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Elizabeth A. Weaver

Maura D. Corrigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.

Stephen J. Markman

Diane M. Hathaway, Justices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

 _________________________________________ 

 Clerk

February 26, 2010 

d0222 

Order 

 

February 26, 2010 

139306 & (10) 

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, 

Plaintiff-Appellee, 

v SC: 139306 

 COA: 291904 

Kent CC: 06-011859-FH 

JUAN ENRIQUE MEJIA, 

Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/ 

 On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the June 5, 2009 order of 

the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because the defendant has failed to 

meet the burden of establishing entitlement to relief under MCR 6.508(D). The motion to 

remand is DENIED.
I 

114TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 3696 

To amend title XVIII of the Social Security Act to prevent Medicare part 

B premium and deductible increases for 2016. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

OCTOBER 7, 2015 

Ms. TITUS introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee 

on Energy and Commerce, and in addition to the Committee on Ways 

and Means, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, 

in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned 

A BILL 

To amend title XVIII of the Social Security Act to prevent 

Medicare part B premium and deductible increases for 2016. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Medicare Premium 

5 Fairness Act of 2015’’. 

6 SEC. 2. PREVENTING MEDICARE PART B PREMIUM AND DE7 DUCTIBLE INCREASES FOR 2016. 

8 (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 1839(a) of the Social Se9 curity Act (42 U.S.C. 1395r(a)) is amended— 


SSpencer on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 3696 IH

1 (1) in the second sentence of paragraph (1), by 

2 striking ‘‘Such’’ and inserting ‘‘Subject to paragraph 

3 (5), such’’; and 

4 (2) by adding at the end the following new 

5 paragraph: 

6 ‘‘(5) In applying this part (including subsection (i) 

7 and section 1833(b)), the monthly actuarial rate for en8 rollees age 65 and over for 2016 shall be equal to the 

9 monthly actuarial rate for such enrollees for 2015.’’. 

10 (b) CONFORMING FUNDING.—Section 1844(a) of the 

11 Social Security Act (42 U.S.C. 1395w(a)) is amended— 

12 (1) in paragraph (3), by striking the period at 

13 the end and inserting ‘‘; plus’’; and 

14 (2) by adding at the end the following: 

15 ‘‘(4) a Government contribution equal to, as es16 timated by the Chief Actuary of the Centers for 

17 Medicare & Medicaid Services, the reduction in ag18 gregate premiums payable for a month under this 

19 part that is attributable to the application of section 

20 1839(a)(5) with respect to— 

21 ‘‘(A) enrollees age 65 and over; and 

22 ‘‘(B) enrollees under age 65. 

23 In applying paragraph (1), the government contribution 

24 under paragraph (4) with respect to enrollees described 

25 in subparagraphs (A) and (B) of such paragraph (4) shall 


SSpencer on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
3 

•HR 3696 IH

1 be treated as premiums payable and deposited in the 

2 Trust Fund under subparagraphs (A) and (B), respec3 tively, of paragraph (1).’’. 

Æ 


SSpencer on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
#### Rayfield A. WARD, Plaintiff—Appellant, v. NORFOLK SHIPBUILDING & DRYDOCK CORPORATION; Local 684, International Brotherhood of Boiler Makers, Defendants—Appellees.

No. 06-1427.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: July 20, 2006.

Decided: July 24, 2006.

Rayfield A. Ward, Appellant Pro Se. Thomas Michael Lucas, Kristina Helen Vaquera, Troutman & Sanders, LLP, Virginia Beach, Virginia; SuAnne Hardee Bryant, Bryant *&*Associates, PC, Chesapeake, Virginia; Charles S. Montagna, Montagna, Klein, Camden, LLP, Norfolk, Virginia, for Appellees.

Before WIDENER and WILKINSON, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).

PER CURIAM:

Rayfield A. Ward appeals the district court’s orders dismissing his civil action against Defendants. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. *Ward v. Norfolk Shipbuilding & Drydock Corp.,*No. 2:05-cv-00412-RBS (E.D. Va. Sept. 30, 2005 & Feb. 23, 2006). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*AFFIRMED.*
#### § 8.21 General.

It is unlawful for an industry member to require, by agreement or otherwise, that any retailer purchase distilled spirits, wine, or malt beverages from the industry member to the exclusion, in whole or in part, of products sold or offered for sale by other persons in interstate or foreign commerce. This prohibition includes purchases coerced by industry members, through acts or threats of physical or economic harm, as well as voluntary industry member-retailer purchase agreements.
An equal opportunity employer 

Thomas M. Gray 

211(b) Technical Manager 

1220 L Street, Northwest

Washington, DC 20005-4070

Tel 202-682-8480 

Fax 202-682-8270 

E-mail grayt@api.org

June 9, 2010 

Karl Simon 

Division Director 

Compliance and Innovative Strategies Division 

Office of Transportation and Air Quality 

1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, N. W. 

Mail Code: 6406J 

Washington, DC 20460 

RE: CAA Section 211(b) Fuels and Fuel Additives Health Effects Testing Regulation: Final Submission 

for 211(b) (Docket No. A-90-07) 

211(b) Chronic Carcinogenicity Study Gasoline MTBE Vapor Condensate (GMVC) (LRRI Study 

No. FY01-013) 

Dear Mr. Karl Simon: 

The American Petroleum Institute (API), on behalf of the Section 211(b) Research Group (RG), is submitting the 

following information to EPA as partial fulfillment of the CAA Section 211(b) Alternative Tier 2 requirements of 

the testing regulation: 

• 211(b) Chronic Carcinogenicity Study Gasoline MTBE Vapor Condensate (GMVC) (LRRI 

Study No. FY01-013) 

The Final Report has undergone review by two independent peer-reviewers, outside QA/QC, EPA and the 211(b) 

Technical Workgroup. Therefore the report is being submitted to you at the EPA Office of Transportation and 

Air Quality, Transportation and Regional Programs Division, as part of the requirements of Clean Air Act Section 

211(b)(2) and 211(e) (Docket No. A-90-07). If you require further information or have any questions regarding 

this submission, please contact me. 

Regards, 

Thomas M. Gray, M.S., DABT 

Encl (1): Chronic Carcinogenicity Study Gasoline MTBE Vapor Condensate (GMVC) (LRRI Study No. 

FY01-013) 

Cc: Joe Sopata, EPA (via email)
Exh 102 Amendment No 2 to Note


		
			Exhibit 10.2
		

		
			 
		

		
			AMENDMENT NO. 2 OF 
		

		
			SENIOR UNSECURED PROMISSORY NOTE
		

		
			 
		

		
			THIS AMENDMENT NO. 2 (this “Amendment”) to the Senior Unsecured Promissory Note dated October 17, 2014, as amended (the "Note") is dated effective as of July 1, 2015, by and between Namecheap, Inc. (“Namecheap”), and Rightside Group, Ltd. (“Rightside”).  Unless otherwise expressly defined herein, all capitalized terms used herein shall have the meanings set forth in the Note.  
		

		
			 
		

		
			WHEREAS, Namecheap issued the Note to Rightside in the original principal amount of $2,500,000 on October 17, 2014, as amended December 31, 2014, in connection with that certain Registrar Agreement between Namecheap and eNom, Incorporated dated December 20, 2013; and
		

		
			 
		

		
			WHEREAS, Namecheap and Rightside wish to extend the Maturity Date.  
		

		
			 
		

		
			NOW, THEREFORE, for good and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which are hereby acknowledged, Namecheap and Rightside hereby agree as set forth below.
		

		
			 
		

			
	
			
				 1.
			

			
	
			
			The Maturity Date of the Note is hereby extended from June 30, 2015 to July 31, 2015.  




		
			 
		

			
	
			
				 2.
			

			
	
			
			Except as modified hereby, the Note shall remain in full force and effect.




		
			 
		

			
	
			
				 3.
			

			
	
			
			Each of Namecheap and Rightside represents and warrants to the other that it has the right, power and authority to enter into this Amendment.  




		
			 
		

			
	
			
				 4.
			

			
	
			
			This Amendment may be executed in counterparts, each of which shall be an original, and deemed to constitute one and the same instrument.  Signatures delivered by facsimile or PDF shall have the same force and effect as manual signatures delivered in person.  




		
			 
		

		
			 
		

		
			[Signature Page Follows]
		

		

		

		 

 

		
		

		
			 
		

		
			IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused the foregoing Amendment to be signed by a duly authorized agent of each party, executed as of the day and year first above written.
		

		
			 
		

			
					
						 

					
					
						 

					
					
						 

					
					
						 

				
	
					
						NAMECHEAP, INC. RIGHTSIDE GROUP, LTD. 

					
					
						 

					
					
						 

				
	
					
						 

					
					
						 

					
					
						 

					
					
						 

				
	
					
						By:

					
					
						/s/ Richard Kirkendall

					
					
						By:

					
					
						/s/ Tracy Knox

				
	
					
						 

					
					
						Name: Richard Kirkendall

					
					
						 

					
					
						Name: Tracy Knox

				
	
					
						 

					
					
						Title:    CEO

					
					
						 

					
					
						Title:   CFO
477 P.2d 813

#### MOCK HOMES, INC., by William P. Stanley, Trustee in Bankruptcy, Defendant-Appellee and Cross-Appellee, v. Ernest J. WAKELY and Janet C. Wakely, his wife, and Sandia Savings & Loan Association, Defendants-Appellants, v. Orrion PERRY, d/b/a Gas Appliance and Service Company, Defendant-Appellee, v. DAR TILE COMPANY and Blueher Lumber Company, Defendants-Appellees and Cross-Appellants.

No. 9019.

Supreme Court of New Mexico.

Dec. 14, 1970.

Hines & Sullivan, Smith & Piper, Albuquerque, for defendants-appellants.

McAtee, Marchiondo & Michael, Pat Chowning, Albuquerque, for Orrion Perry.

Oliver Burton Cohen, Albuquerque, for Dar Tile Co. and Blueher Lumber Co.

OPINION

WATSON, Justice.

A complaint was filed with the District Court of Bernalillo County by Carroll-Loy Plumbing and Heating Company, Inc., alleging that it performed labor and furnished materials at the request of Mock Homes, Inc. on the home of Ernest J. and Janet C. Wakely for which it had not been paid. The complaint sets out the plaintiff’s lien and joins the Wakelys, their mortgage holder, and other lien claimants as defendants. From the record before us it does not appear that a judgment has ever been entered on this complaint.

A judgment was entered in favor of lien-claimants Orrion Perry, Blueher Lumber Company, Inc., and Dar Tile Company, Inc. on their cross-claims; and the Wakelys and their mortgagee, Sandia Savings and Loan Association, have appealed from this judgment.. Blueher and Dar Tile have cross-appealed. With the plaintiff’s claim undetermined, this judgment appears to be one entered upon fewer than all of the claims and is not upon the express determination that there is no just reason for delay. Rule 54(b) [§ 21 — 1— 1(54) (b), N.M.S.A.1953 Comp.]. It is not a final judgment from which an appeal *180will lie to this court. Carpenter v. Merrett. (Decided December *7,*1970), 82 N.M. 185, 477 P.2d 819 (1970).

The appeal and cross-appeals are dismissed.

It is so ordered.

COMPTON, C. J., and McKENNA J., concur.
116TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 543 

AN ACT 

To require the Federal Railroad Administration to provide 

appropriate congressional notice of comprehensive safety 

assessments conducted with respect to intercity or commuter rail passenger transportation. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 
2 

•HR 543 EH

1 SECTION 1. NOTICE OF COMPREHENSIVE SAFETY ASSESS2 MENTS. 

3 (a) INITIAL NOTICE.—Not later than 10 business 

4 days after the Federal Railroad Administration initiates 

5 a comprehensive safety assessment of an entity providing 

6 regularly scheduled intercity or commuter rail passenger 

7 transportation, the Federal Railroad Administration shall 

8 notify in electronic format the Committee on Transpor9 tation and Infrastructure of the House of Representatives 

10 and the Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transpor11 tation of the Senate, and each member of Congress rep12 resenting a State in which the service that is the subject 

13 of the assessment being conducted is located, of the initi14 ation of that assessment. 

15 (b) FINDINGS.—Not later than 90 days after comple16 tion of a comprehensive safety assessment described in 

17 subsection (a), the Federal Railroad Administration shall 

18 transmit in electronic format to the Committee on Trans19 portation and Infrastructure of the House of Representa20 tives and the Committee on Commerce, Science, and 

21 Transportation of the Senate, and to each member of Con22 gress representing a State in which the service that is the 

23 subject of the assessment being conducted is located, its 

24 findings of that assessment, including identified defects 

25 and any recommendations. 
3 

•HR 543 EH

1 (c) DEFINITION.—For purpose of this section, the 

2 term ‘‘comprehensive safety assessment’’ means a focused 

3 review of the safety-related processes and procedures, 

4 compliance with safety regulations and requirements, and 

5 overall safety culture of an entity providing regularly 

6 scheduled intercity or commuter rail passenger transpor7 tation. 

Passed the House of Representatives February 6, 

2019. 

Attest: 

Clerk. 
116TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 543 

AN ACT 

To require the Federal Railroad Administration to 

transportation. spect to intercity or commuter rail passenger prehensive safety assessments conducted with reprovide appropriate congressional notice of com-
(No. 74-CC-120

#### Sieg Peoria Company, Claimant, *vs.*State of Illinois, Department of General Services, Respondent.

*Opinion filed February 8, 1974.*

Sieg Peoria Company, pro se.

William J. Scott, Attorney General; Howard W. Feldman, Assistant Attorney General, for Respondent.

Per Curiam.
TREATIES AND OTHER INTERNATIONAL ACTS SERIES 07-918.1 

________________________________________________________________________ 

NUCLEAR SAFETY 

 Arrangement Between the 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA 

and SWITZERLAND 

Signed at Vienna September 18, 2007 

with 

Addenda 
 NOTE BY THE DEPARTMENT OF STATE 

 Pursuant to Public Law 89—497, approved July 8, 1966 

(80 Stat. 271; 1 U.S.C. 113)—

“. . .the Treaties and Other International Acts Series issued 

under the authority of the Secretary of State shall be competent 

 evidence . . . of the treaties, international agreements other than 

treaties, and proclamations by the President of such treaties and 

international agreements other than treaties, as the case may be, 

therein contained, in all the courts of law and equity and of maritime 

jurisdiction, and in all the tribunals and public offices of the 

United States, and of the several States, without any further proof 

or authentication thereof.” 
SWITZERLAND 

Nuclear Safety 

 Arrangement signed at Vienna September 18, 2007; 

 Entered into force September 18, 2007. 

 With addenda.