alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 21

SUBSIDIARIES OF THE REGISTRANT AS ATDECEMBER 31, 2003 (100% owned)

OPPENHEIMER HOLDINGS INC. (Ontario)

> 
E.A. VINER HOLDINGS CO. (Delaware)

> 
NEWSON INC. (Pennsylvania)

> 
OPPENHEIMER ASSET MANAGEMENTINC.        (New York)

> 
EVANSTON FINANCIAL INC. (New York)

> 
OPPENHEIMER TRUST COMPANY (New        Jersey)

> 
VINER FINANCE INC. (Delaware)

> 
OPPENHEIMER & CO. INC. (New            York)

> 
FIRST OF MICHIGAN CAPITAL                CORPORATION (Delaware)

> 
-OLD MICHIGAN                    CORPORATION (Delaware)

-CRANBROOK CAPITAL                    MANAGEMENT, INC. (Michigan)

-FIRST OF MICHIGAN                    VENTURE CAPITAL ASSOCIATES, INC. (Michigan)

> 
PACE SECURITIES INC. (New                York)

FREEDOM INVESTMENTS, INC.                (Delaware)

REICH & CO.INC.                (Alabama)

GRAND CHARTER GROUP,                INCORPORATED (Delaware)

PRIME CHARTER LTD.                    (Delaware)

JOSEPHTHAL & CO. INC.                (New York)
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

DAY ELEV

 221.16

 220.95

 221.55

 220.92

 220.50

 220.75

 220.57

 221.35

 221.94

 220.76

 219.99

 221.36

 223.63

 224.36

 224.34

 223.06

 221.38

 218.86

 217.86

 218.32

 218.32

 217.95

 219.18

 220.42

 220.65

 221.68

 222.59

 222.09

 224.43

 46,180

 45,629

 47,204

 45,551

 44,453

 45,106

 44,635

 46,679

 48,229

 45,132

 43,126

 46,705

 52,732

 54,698

 54,644

 51,206

 46,758

 40,229

 37,726

 38,870

 38,870

 37,948

 41,042

 44,244

 44,844

 47,546

 49,953

 48,624

 54,887

STORAGE

+1,753

-551

+1,575

-1,653

-1,098

+653

-471

+2,044

+1,550

-3,097

-2,006

+3,579

+6,027

+1,966

-54

-3,438

-4,448

-6,529

-2,503

+1,144

+0

-922

+3,094

+3,202

+600

+2,702

+2,407

-1,329

+6,263

CHANGE

1,226

992

872

288

0

40

236

15

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

189

472

500

177

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

96

257

PUMPING

 5,301

 5,453

 5,465

 6,635

 5,801

 4,043

 4,237

 4,153

 3,807

 3,894

 4,429

 3,932

 3,852

 4,125

 3,727

 4,125

 4,737

 4,487

 4,090

 4,224

 4,826

 5,698

 5,140

 5,887

 5,712

 4,685

 5,325

 5,526

 5,373

PUMPING

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 172

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 210

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 428

 0

PUMPING

 0

 0

 0

 124

 140

 0

 0

 356

 1,012

 1,256

 1,537

 1,449

 650

 74

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 690

 1,228

 1,323

 1,066

 728

 521

 0

 0

GEN.

*

+75

-487

-83

+232

+38

+240

+132

-97

-144

+32

+57

-112

+34

+28

+127

+162

+286

+97

+30

-36

-137

+8

-234

-148

-46

-216

-233

+29

+154

OR

UNITED STATES 

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION

CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT

CONSOLIDATED STATE-FEDERAL O'NEILL FOREBAY March 28, 2012

DAILY OPERATIONS

FEBRUARY 2012 RUN DATE:

IN LAKE GEN.

ACRE-FEET O'NEILL

RELEASE - C.F.S. 

TOTALS +10,460 5,360 12,154 810 138,689 -212

ACRE-FEET +10,460 10,632 24,107 1,607 275,090

SUMMARY

 562

RELEASE (ACRE-FEET)

O'NEILL GEN. 24,107

SAN LUIS PUMP 1,607 562

 44,427

DOS AMIGOS PUMP 275,090

DELIVERIES 

S. LUIS O'NEILL

 2,090

 2,080

 2,080

 2,080

 2,080

 2,080

 2,080

 4,143

 4,560

 2,919

 4,120

 6,100

 6,073

 3,060

 1,020

 0

 340

 0

 1,459

 3,862

 4,120

 5,263

 7,514

 8,065

 6,084

 6,060

 6,030

 3,518

 5,917

 104,797

 207,865

CALIF. DOS AMIGOS

AQUEDUCT

2,794

2,590

3,390

3,324

3,269

2,011

1,551

1,480

1,184

810

777

1,198

1,433

2,101

2,553

2,251

1,396

598

1,162

975

842

651

648

908

1,043

932

1,262

1,641

2,487

 47,261

 93,742

S. LUIS

DELIV.

GAINS(+)

LOSS(-)

C.F.S.

INFLOW - C.F.S.

STATE OF CALIFORNIA

THE RESOURCES AGENCY

DEPARTMENT OF WATER RESOURCES

STATE WATER PROJECT

TOTAL 301,366

-421

* DAILY DEL. FIGURES UNAVAILABLE. TOT. DEL. IS INCLUDED IN COMPUTING MONTHLY TOTALS 

Table 18
Electrical Conductivity, UMHOS

Day High Low Mean 14 DAY ACCUM MEAN 14 DAY AVG MEAN

1 110 105 107 1,838 131

2 123 107 111 1,698 121

3 158 109 118 1,559 111

4 189 112 125 1,492 107

5 185 114 128 1,519 109

6 172 116 129 1,546 110

7 153 118 127 1,571 112

8 142 119 127 1,594 114

9 149 120 129 1,619 116

10 153 121 130 1,646 118

11 172 123 135 1,678 120

12 204 125 146 1,721 123

13 252 129 159 1,776 127

14 282 133 169 1,840 131

15 292 136 176 1,909 136

16 296 139 183 1,981 142

17 336 144 199 2,062 147

18 331 144 199 2,136 153

19 314 142 194 2,202 157

20 286 141 187 2,260 161

21 264 145 182 2,315 165

22 251 147 183 2,371 169

23 245 147 180 2,422 173

24 236 148 176 2,468 176

25 252 151 179 2,512 179

26 303 159 196 2,562 183

27 330 159 214 2,617 187

28 392 161 233 2,681 192

29 442 164 251 2,756 197

30 486 174 268 2,841 203

31 553 184 282 2,924 209

COMMENT(S):

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

Historical Archive and Report Database

Jersey Point Top On The San Joaquin River 

Period: July 2023 Run Date: 8/15/2023
###### Editorial Note on Part 71

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 71 appear by T.D. ATF-414, 64 FR 49084, Sept. 10, 1999and T.D. ATF-463, 66 FR 42734, 42735, Aug. 15, 2001.

#### § 71.99 Conduct of hearing.

The administrative law judge is charged with the duty of conducting a fair and impartial hearing and of maintaining order in form and manner consistent with dignity. In the event that counsel or any person or witness in any proceeding shall refuse to obey the orders of the administrative law judge, or be guilty of disorderly or contemptuous language or conduct in connection with any hearing, the administrative law judge may, for good cause stated in the record, suspend the hearing, and, in the case of an attorney, recommend that the Administrator report the matter to the Administrator of Practice for disciplinary action. The refusal of a witness to answer any question which has been ruled to be proper shall be considered by the administrative law judge in determining the weight to be given all the testimony of that witness.

[21 FR 1441, Mar. 6, 1956. Redesignated at 40 FR 16835, Apr. 15, 1975, and amended by T.D. ATF-48, 43 FR 13531, Mar. 31, 1978; 44 FR 55846, Sept. 28, 1979]
#### § 202.7 Service or operation in connection with railroad transportation.

The service rendered or the operation of equipment or facilities by persons or companies owned or controlled by or under common control with a carrier is in connection with the transportation of passengers or property by railroad, or the receipt, delivery, elevation, transfer in transit, refrigeration or icing, storage, or handling of property transported by railroad, if such service or operation is reasonably directly related, functionally or economically, to the performance of obligations which a company or person or companies or persons have undertaken as a common carrier by railroad, or to the receipt, delivery, elevation, transfer in transit, refrigeration or icing, storage, or handling of property transported by railroad.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY ELEV

 485.77

 486.13

 486.74

 487.13

 487.52

 487.68

 488.10

 488.38

 488.75

 489.02

 489.45

 489.84

 490.21

 490.59

 490.73

 490.86

 491.24

 491.68

 491.96

 492.45

 492.73

 492.87

 493.18

 493.60

 494.01

 494.41

 494.98

 495.65

 497.11

 498.15

 499.20

 176.3

 177.2

 178.8

 179.8

 180.9

 181.3

 182.4

 183.1

 184.1

 184.8

 186.0

 187.0

 188.0

 189.1

 189.4

 189.8

 190.8

 192.0

 192.8

 194.1

 194.9

 195.3

 196.2

 197.3

 198.5

 199.6

 201.2

 203.1

 207.2

 210.2

 213.3

STORAGE

+0.7

+0.9

+1.6

+1.0

+1.0

+0.4

+1.1

+0.7

+1.0

+0.7

+1.2

+1.0

+1.0

+1.0

+0.4

+0.4

+1.0

+1.2

+0.8

+1.4

+0.8

+0.4

+0.9

+1.2

+1.1

+1.1

+1.6

+1.9

+4.2

+3.0

+3.1

CHANGE

528

604

941

735

810

435

694

510

636

509

718

757

800

827

493

484

826

912

689

984

670

458

700

750

669

659

903

1,154

2,384

1,806

1,837

INFLOW

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

MADERA

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

SPILL

 0

 0

 0

 88

 153

 90

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 94

 162

 163

 164

 164

 165

 166

 167

 168

 169

 170

 171

 72

 0

 0

 0

 103

 183

 184

 186

FRIANT-KERN

 18

 1

 6

 1

 8

 1

 3

 3

 9

 15

 4

 4

 2

 11

 4

 8

 5

 5

 2

 1

 4

 4

 6

 0

 5

 4

 5

 3

 11

 16

 17

C.F.S.

 .22

 .01

 .07

 .01

 .09

 .01

 .03

 .03

 .11

 .17

 .05

 .05

 .02

 .12

 .04

 .09

 .06

 .06

 .02

 .01

 .04

 .05

 .07

 .00

 .05

 .04

 .05

 .03

 .12

 .17

 .18

INCHES

 .13

 .64

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .02

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .22

 .23

 .00

 .00

 .05

 .02

 .00

 .30

 .00

 .03

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .69

 .77

 .45

 .00

PRECIP

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

DECEMBER 2001 MILLERTON LAKE DAILY OPERATIONS RUN DATE: January 24, 2002

IN LAKE

EVAPORATION

INCHES

C.F.S.

COMPUTED*

1000 ACRE-FEET

RELEASE - C.F.S. 

TOTALS +37.8 25,882 0 2,982 0 186 2.07 3.55

ACRE-FEET +37,765 51,337 0 5,915 0 369

COMMENTS:

* COMPUTED INFLOW IS THE SUM OF CHANGE IN STORAGE, RELEASES, PUMPING AND EVAPORATION.

SUMMARY

RELEASE (ACRE-FEET)

CANALS

FRIANT-KERN

MADERA

 5,915

 0 13,200

PRECIPITATION

THIS MONTH =

JULY 1, 2001 TO DATE = 6.72

 175.5

 7,285 3.55

CANALS

AT FRIANT

TOTAL RELEASES

OUTLET

 132

 132

 132

 132

 132

 132

 132

 132

 132

 132

 133

 133

 133

 134

 134

 134

 134

 134

 134

 134

 108

 89

 89

 89

 89

 89

 91

 92

 92

 94

 94

RIVER

 3,673

 7,285

RIVER

Table 15
§ 222.20 When determination of relationship as divorced spouse, surviving divorced spouse, or remarried widow(er) is made. ( a ) *Divorced spouse.* The claimant's relationship as the divorced spouse of an employee is determined when the purported divorced spouse applies for an annuity, or when there is a claim which would include a divorced spouse in the computation of the social security overall minimum provision. Such a determination is also made when a spouse annuitant age 62 or over secures a final divorce from the employee after 10 years of marriage.
( b ) *Surviving divorced spouse.* The claimant's relationship as the surviving divorced spouse of an employee is determined when the purported surviving divorced spouse applies for an annuity on the basis of age, disability, or having a child in care. Such a determination is also made when there is a divorced spouse annuitant and the employee dies.
( c ) *Remarried widow(er).* The claimant's relationship as a remarried widow(er) of an employee is determined when the purported remarried widow(er) applies for an annuity. Such a determination is also made when a widow(er) who is receiving an annuity remarries after age 60, or when a widow(er) who is receiving a disability annuity remarries after age 50.
### §71b. Status of completed addition

Any building constructed under authority of section 71a of this title shall, upon completion, be a part of the National Gallery of Art.

(Pub. L. 90–376, §2, July 5, 1968, 82 Stat. 286.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section was not enacted as part of act Mar. 24, 1937, ch. 50, 50 Stat. 51, which comprises this subchapter.
### §1070d–40. Construction of needs provisions

Except as provided in section 1087kk of this title, nothing in this subpart, or any other Act, shall be construed to permit the receipt of a scholarship under this subpart to be counted for any needs test in connection with the awarding of any grant or the making of any loan under this chapter or any other provision of Federal law relating to educational assistance.

(Pub. L. 89–329, title IV, §419J, as added Pub. L. 99–498, title IV, §401(a), Oct. 17, 1986, 100 Stat. 1345; amended Pub. L. 102–325, title IV, §406(f), July 23, 1992, 106 Stat. 509.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Prior Provisions

A prior section 1070d–40, Pub. L. 89–329, title IV, §419J, as added Pub. L. 98–558, title VIII, §801(a), Oct. 30, 1984, 98 Stat. 2902, provided that receipt of scholarship under Robert C. Byrd Honors Scholarship Program not be counted for needs test for education grant or loan, prior to the general revision of this part by Pub. L. 99–498.

#### Amendments

1992—Pub. L. 102–325 substituted "Except as provided in section 1087kk of this title, nothing" for "Nothing".
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY HIGH

 18,256

 22,202

 20,594

 22,437

 24,370

 23,218

 24,062

 25,623

 23,638

 24,453

 22,650

 19,603

 17,207

 17,067

 15,033

 11,364

 17,215

 23,713

 24,717

 24,718

 25,136

 23,224

 20,813

 16,762

 14,246

 12,448

 11,690

 10,194

 12,648

 13,138

 14,257

 10,371

 11,298

 12,087

 12,759

 11,661

 12,857

 12,304

 12,658

 12,769

 13,437

 13,243

 12,654

 11,701

 11,653

 10,378

 7,417

 7,409

 11,618

 12,206

 13,613

 13,105

 11,667

 10,822

 7,507

 6,002

 5,573

 4,438

 3,420

 3,123

 4,635

 4,621

 13,036

 15,379

 15,878

 16,599

 17,551

 18,446

 18,201

 17,973

 18,605

 18,676

 17,804

 16,308

 15,078

 13,835

 11,977

 9,339

 10,722

 16,642

 17,791

 18,321

 19,860

 17,392

 17,258

 13,840

 10,942

 9,387

 7,731

 6,351

 6,414

 7,515

 7,917

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

JANUARY 2012 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: February 16, 2012

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

PORT CHICAGO TOP IN SUISUN BAY
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 01-2495

LEONARD A. LYLES,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

GEORGE BALOG, Commissioner,

Defendant - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of

Maryland, at Baltimore. Marvin J. Garbis, District Judge. (CA-99-

3084-MJG)

Submitted: April 29, 2002 Decided: June 3, 2002

Before WIDENER, TRAXLER, and KING, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Leonard A. Lyles, Appellant Pro Se. Allyson Murphy Huey, OFFICE OF

THE CITY SOLICITOR, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Leonard A. Lyles appeals the district court’s order granting

summary judgment in favor of Appellees on his religious

discrimination claims. We have reviewed the record and the district

court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we

affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Lyles v. Balog, No.

CA-99-3084-MJG (D. Md. Nov. 8, 2001). We dispense with oral

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately

presented in the materials before the court and argument would not

aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

DAY

 19,523

 19,664

 19,839

 20,037

 20,220

 20,465

 20,866

 21,514

 22,151

 23,287

 24,321

 25,400

 26,622

 27,703

 28,904

 30,146

 31,498

 32,976

 34,739

 36,299

 37,589

 38,711

 39,574

 40,379

 41,283

 42,025

 42,683

 43,385

 44,161

 45,023

 24,857

 24,974

 25,019

 25,077

 25,113

 25,179

 25,312

 25,447

 25,651

 25,810

 25,964

 26,146

 26,279

 26,393

 26,503

 26,604

 26,728

 26,856

 26,929

 27,021

 27,164

 27,206

 27,243

 27,257

 27,427

 27,511

 27,594

 27,635

 27,747

 27,876

STORAGE - A.F. 

 44,380

 44,638

 44,858

 45,114

 45,333

 45,644

 46,178

 46,961

 47,802

 49,097

 50,285

 51,546

 52,901

 54,096

 55,407

 56,750

 58,226

 59,832

 61,668

 63,320

 64,753

 65,917

 66,817

 67,636

 68,710

 69,536

 70,277

 71,020

 71,908

 72,899

823

790

496

605

394

535

719

765

786

825

958

452

660

805

590

683

920

711

599

548

634

549

445

573

963

668

572

580

726

826

950

920

607

734

504

692

988

1,160

1,210

1,478

1,557

1,088

1,343

1,407

1,251

1,360

1,664

1,521

1,525

1,381

1,356

1,136

899

986

1,504

1,084

946

955

1,174

1,326

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

APRIL 2014 FULL NATURAL FLOW AT NEW MELONES DAM RUN DATE: 05/05/2014

TOTALS +28,770 34,706

* October 1, 68,839

 145.0

 146.9

 148.1

 149.5

 150.5

 151.9

 153.9

 156.2

 158.6

 161.5

 164.6

 166.7

 169.4

 172.2

 174.7

 177.4

 180.7

 183.7

 186.7

 189.4

 192.1

 194.4

 196.2

 198.1

 201.1

 203.3

 205.1

 207.0

 209.4

 212.0

DONNELLS

RES

BEARDSLEY

RES

2013 TO DATE

NEW

MELONES

INFLOW

C.F.S

NATURAL

RIVER

C.F.S

ACCUM *

FULL

NATURAL

1000 A.F.

RESERVOIR

TOTAL

+251

+258

+220

+256

+219

+311

+534

+783

+841

+1,295

+1,188

+1,261

+1,355

+1,195

+1,311

+1,343

+1,476

+1,606

+1,836

+1,652

+1,433

+1,164

+900

+819

+1,074

+826

+741

+743

+888

+991

CHANGE

A.F. C.F.S.

+127

+130

+111

+129

+110

+157

+269

+395

+424

+653

+599

+636

+683

+602

+661

+677

+744

+810

+926

+833

+722

+587

+454

+413

+541

+416

+374

+375

+448

+500
Editorial Note on Part 26
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 26 appear by T.D. ATF-451, 66 FR 21668, 21669, May 1, 2001.

§ 26.104 Deferred payment of tax—release of beer. ( a ) *Action by brewer.* Where the brewer will defer payment of tax, he must execute the agreement on TTB Form 5100.21 to pay the amount of tax which has been computed and entered on the form. If a bond is required under § 26.68, he must certify under the penalties of perjury that he is not in default of any payment of tax chargeable against his bond, and that his bond is in the maximum penal sum, or that it is sufficient to cover the amount of tax on the beer described on the form in addition to all other amounts chargeable against his bond. If the brewer deferring payment of tax is not required to provide a bond under § 26.68, the brewer must certify under the penalties of perjury that the brewer was liable for not more than $50,000 in taxes in the preceding calendar year and reasonably expects to be liable for not more than $50,000 during the current calendar year. The brewer must deliver all copies of Form 5100.21 to the revenue agent.
( b ) *Action by revenue agent.* On receipt of TTB Form 5100.21, the revenue agent shall verify the computation of the tax entered on the form, and if the proprietor has on file a good and sufficient bond, TTB Form 5130.16, so indicate on TTB Form 5100.21. The revenue agent shall then execute his report of release on the TTB Form 5100.21 and release the beer for the purpose authorized on the form. The completed form shall be distributed in the same manner as provided for TTB Form 5110.51 in § 26.80(b). Where the revenue agent finds that the proprietor does not have good and sufficient bond coverage, or that the proprietor is in default of payment of any taxes previously charged to his bond, he shall return all copies of TTB Form 5100.21 to the proprietor, giving his reasons for such action.
[T.D. 6695, 28 FR 12934, Dec. 5, 1963. Redesignated at 40 FR 16835, Apr. 15, 1975, and amended by T.D. ATF-62, 44 FR 71712, Dec. 11, 1979. Redesignated and amended by T.D. ATF-459, 66 FR 38550, 38551, July 25, 2001; T.D. TTB-146, 82 FR 1132, Jan. 4, 2017]
<PAGE>



 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 1350 OF CHAPTER 63 OF TITLE 18 OF THE UNITED
                                  STATES CODE

         I, Eric T. Steigerwalt, the Chief Financial Officer of MetLife
Insurance Company of Connecticut (the "Company"), certify that (i) the Company's
Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2006 (the "Form
10-Q") fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and (ii) the information contained in the Form
10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and
results of operations of the Company.

Date:    May 15, 2006

                                /s/ Eric T. Steigerwalt
                               -------------------------------------------------
                               Eric T. Steigerwalt
                               Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer


         A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has
been provided to MetLife Insurance Company of Connecticut and will be retained
by MetLife Insurance Company of Connecticut and furnished to the Securities and
Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
Note for the Docket:

Federal Land Managers Consultation

On November 20, 2012, EPA held a conference call with the participants listed below to 

discuss our upcoming partial approval and partial disapproval of Washington's Regional 

Haze SIP and EPA's FIP for Tesoro and Intalco. The FLM participants went through 

their comments and questions on the draft Federal Register Notice we provided them. 

This formal call was in follow-up to the many informal preliminary staff and 

management-level discussions on this action.

Participants on November 20 conference call: 

Steve Body, EPA

Dave Bray, EPA

Todd Hawes, EPA

Juliane Matthews, EPA

Debra Suzuki, EPA

Pat Brewer, NPS

Tonnie Cummings, NPS

Rick Graw, USFS

Don Shepherd, NPS
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

DAY ELEV

 551.25

 551.77

 552.21

 552.75

 553.14

 553.47

 553.50

 553.44

 553.33

 553.06

 553.26

 553.32

 553.46

 553.47

 553.42

 553.45

 553.33

 553.40

 554.11

 554.35

 554.39

 554.06

 553.74

 553.45

 553.46

 553.61

 553.35

 553.30

 398.7

 400.9

 402.7

 405.0

 406.7

 408.1

 408.2

 408.0

 407.5

 406.3

 407.2

 407.4

 408.0

 408.1

 407.9

 408.0

 407.5

 407.8

 410.8

 411.8

 412.0

 410.6

 409.2

 408.0

 408.0

 408.7

 407.6

 407.4

STORAGE

+2.0

+2.2

+1.9

+2.3

+1.7

+1.4

+0.1

-0.3

-0.5

-1.2

+0.9

+0.3

+0.6

+0.0

-0.2

+0.1

-0.5

+0.3

+3.0

+1.0

+0.2

-1.4

-1.4

-1.2

+0.0

+0.6

-1.1

-0.2

CHANGE

2,231

2,106

2,001

2,222

1,968

1,882

1,257

1,207

1,524

1,405

2,279

1,888

1,956

1,892

1,870

2,016

1,757

2,211

3,395

2,432

2,192

1,609

1,625

1,915

2,644

2,976

2,113

2,390

INFLOW

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 14

 155

 271

 293

 270

 227

 143

 0

 0

 182

 305

 73

 0

 0

 0

 0

 177

 162

 280

 370

 267

MADERA

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

SPILL

 837

 800

 855

 858

 913

 953

 979

 1,114

 1,396

 1,490

 1,344

 1,266

 1,210

 1,499

 1,759

 1,743

 1,612

 1,545

 1,588

 1,706

 1,896

 2,112

 2,103

 2,147

 2,246

 2,157

 2,094

 2,009

FRIANT-KERN

 1

 1

 8

 10

 19

 19

 12

 7

 8

 23

 11

 22

 17

 28

 19

 8

 21

 12

 6

 7

 10

 11

 10

 15

 14

 17

 8

 21

C.F.S.

 .01

 .01

 .06

 .07

 .14

 .14

 .09

 .05

 .06

 .17

 .08

 .16

 .12

 .20

 .14

 .06

 .15

 .09

 .04

 .05

 .07

 .08

 .07

 .11

 .10

 .12

 .06

 .15

INCHES

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .03

 .23

 .34

 .87

 .15

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .17

 .26

 .00

 .01

 .00

PRECIP

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

FEBRUARY 2011 MILLERTON LAKE DAILY OPERATIONS RUN DATE: March 1, 2011

IN LAKE

EVAPORATION

INCHES

C.F.S.

COMPUTED*

1000 ACRE-FEET

RELEASE - C.F.S. 

TOTALS +10.7 56,963 3,189 42,231 0 365 2.65 2.06

ACRE-FEET +10,687 112,986 6,325 83,765 0 724

COMMENTS:

* COMPUTED INFLOW IS THE SUM OF CHANGE IN STORAGE, RELEASES, PUMPING AND EVAPORATION.

SUMMARY

RELEASE (ACRE-FEET)

CANALS

FRIANT-KERN

MADERA

 83,765

 6,325 101,570

PRECIPITATION

THIS MONTH =

JULY 1, 2010 TO DATE = 17.32

 396.7

 11,480 2.06

CANALS

AT FRIANT

TOTAL RELEASES

OUTLET

 377

 201

 201

 201

 201

 201

 201

 201

 201

 201

 201

 201

 201

 200

 200

 200

 200

 199

 200

 200

 200

 200

 200

 200

 200

 200

 200

 200

RIVER

 5,788

 11,480

RIVER