alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1997
<CASH>                                          30,816
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                30,816
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 827,536
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          817,604
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                       9,932
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   827,536
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                12,325
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                99,042
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 581
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (87,978)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (87,978)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (87,978)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      (7)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      (7)
        

</TABLE>
§ 1011.400 What does a successful applicant receive? ( a ) The award will be in the form of a certificate and will state the year for which it was awarded.
( b ) VETS will also provide a digital image of the medallion for recipients to use, including as part of an advertisement, solicitation, business activity, or product.
### §§867 to 867c. Omitted

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Sections were omitted in the general revision of title V of the Elementary and Secondary Education Act of 1965, Pub. L. 89–10, title V, Apr. 11, 1965, 79 Stat. 47, by Pub. L. 95–561, title V, §501, Nov. 1, 1978, 92 Stat. 2240.

Section 867, Pub. L. 89–10, title V, §531, as added Pub. L. 91–230, title I, §143(a)(4)(D), Apr. 13, 1970, 84 Stat. 145; amended Pub. L. 93–380, title I, §104(c), title VIII, §843(a)(2), (3), Aug. 21, 1974, 88 Stat. 503, 611; Pub. L. 95–112, §2(e)(3), Sept. 24, 1977, 91 Stat. 911, authorized the appropriation of funds for comprehensive planning and evaluation grants for fiscal years ending prior to Oct. 1, 1979.

A prior section 867, Pub. L. 89–10, title V, §507, Apr. 11, 1965, 79 Stat. 51, as amended, was renumbered §553 by Pub. L. 91–230, title I, §143(a)(3), Apr. 13, 1970, 84 Stat. 142, and was classified to section 869b of this title which was repealed by Pub. L. 91–648, title IV, §403, Jan. 5, 1971, 84 Stat. 1925.

Section 867a, Pub. L. 89–10, title V, §532, as added Pub. L. 91–230, title I, §143(a)(4)(D), Apr. 13, 1970, 84 Stat. 146, related to comprehensive planning and evaluation grants and to the establishment and functioning of State planning and evaluation agencies.

Section 867b, Pub. L. 89–10, title V, §533, as added Pub. L. 91–230, title I, §143(a)(4)(D), Apr. 13, 1970, 84 Stat. 147, related to the form and content of grant applications.

Section 867c, Pub. L. 89–10, title V, §534, as added Pub. L. 91–230, title I, §143(a)(4)(D), Apr. 13, 1970, 84 Stat. 148, related to the required annual reports.
#### William J. HADRICK, Petitioner, v. Louis A. HEYD, Jr., Sheriff, Parish of Orleans, Louisiana, Defendant.

Misc. No. 1287.

United States District Court E. D. Louisiana, New Orleans Division.

Dec. 7, 1967.

Philip S. Brooks, New Orleans, La., for petitioner.

Robert E. Peyton, New Orleans, La., for defendant.

RUBIN, District Judge:

The opinion rendered in the Brown case, Brown v. Heyd, D.C., 277 F.Supp. 899, is hereby adopted and made the opinion of the Court in this case. Had-rick’s case is, if anything, stronger than Brown’s because it was Brown, not Had-rick, who told the police, “I know all that.”

Accordingly, the petitioner’s conviction and sentence must be set aside, and therefore

It is hereby ordered that William J. Hadrick be discharged from the custody of the State of Louisiana and from the custody of Louis A. Heyd, Jr., Sheriff of the Parish of Orleans, which custody is pursuant to the sentence imposed upon him in the Criminal District Court for the Parish of Orleans on October 14, 1966. But

It is further ordered that the duty to comply with this order is stayed for sixty days to allow the District Attorney for the Parish of Orleans to seek the retrial of the petitioner.
Editorial Note on Part 18
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 18 appear by T.D. ATF-436, 66 FR 5471, 5472, Jan. 19, 2001.

§ 18.52 Production of high-proof concentrate. ( a ) *General.* High-proof concentrate may be produced in a concentrate plant. Concentrate having an alcohol content of more than 24 percent by volume that is fit for beverage use may not be produced in a concentrate plant.
( b ) *Determination.* A proprietor shall determine whether a particular concentrate is a high-proof concentrate. However, a proprietor may at any time submit a written request to the appropriate TTB officer for a determination of whether a concentrate is unfit for beverage use. Each request for a determination will include information as to kind, percent alcohol by volume, and fold of the concentrate. The request will be accompanied by a representative 8-ounce sample of the concentrate.
(Approved by the Office of Management and Budget under control number 1512-0046) [T.D. ATF-104, 47 FR 23921, June 2, 1982, as amended by T.D. ATF-381, 61 FR 37003, July 16, 1996]
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

MIDDLE DISTRICT

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

Respondent

v.

KEVIN NEYSMITH,

Petitioner :

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

: No. 480 MAL 2018

Petition for Allowance of Appeal from

the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW , this 2nd day of January, 2019

, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is

DENIED

.
### §1045. Limitation on entry of eggs and egg products and other materials into official plants

The Secretary may limit the entry of eggs and egg products and other materials into official plants under such conditions as he may prescribe to assure that allowing the entry of such articles into such plants will be consistent with the purposes of this chapter.

(Pub. L. 91–597, §16, Dec. 29, 1970, 84 Stat. 1630.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

This chapter, referred to in text, was in the original "this Act", meaning Pub. L. 91–597, Dec. 29, 1970, 84 Stat. 1620, which is classified principally to this chapter. For complete classification of this Act to the Code, see Short Title note set out under section 1031 of this title and Tables.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date

For effective date of this section, see section 29 of Pub. L. 91–597, set out as a note under section 1031 of this title.
A-AA+Skip to content

                  - Home
                  - Compendium Statistics
                  - Event
                  - Archives
                  - Glossary
                  - Help
                  - Contact
                  - Research on Disability

Annual Disability Statistics Compendium

              - Home /
              - Compendium Statistics /
              - Veterans /
              - 6.3 Poverty - Civilian Veterans with Disabilities Ages 18-64 Years Living in the Community for the U.S.

## Table 6.3: Poverty—Civilian Veterans with Disabilities Ages 18 to 64 Years Living in the Community for the United States and States: 2012

----

----

 

----

#### 2012 Disability Compendium

                        - Home
                        - Compendium Statistics                           - Population and Prevelance
                          - Employment
                          - Time Trend Population Statistics
                          - Poverty
                          - Earnings
                          - Veterans
                          - Health Insurance Coverage
                          - Health
                          - Social Security Administration Programs
                          - Medicaid and Medicare
                          - Special Education
                          - Vocational Rehabilitation
                          - Federal Government Spending and Employment
                          - International Disability Statistics
                          - Population Statistics: Disability Type
                        - Event
                        - Archives                           - 2012 Compendium Statistics
                        - Glossary
                        - Help
                        - Contact
                        - Research on Disability

#### Funding for this project is made possible by:

 The Research and Training Center on Disability Statistics and Demographics (StatsRRTC), which is funded by the U.S. Department of Education, National Institute for Disability and Rehabilitation Research, under cooperative agreements H133B080012.

#### Stay Connected

**Institute on Disability**10 West Edge Drive, Suite 101Durham, NH 03824603.862.4320 | relay: 711 | [email protected]www.iod.unh.edu

© 2013. Institute on Disability.University of New Hampshire.
### §2315. Procedures for judicial review of classified information

#### (a) In general

If a finding under this subchapter, or a prohibition, condition, or penalty imposed as a result of any such finding, is based on classified information (as defined in section 1(a) of the Classified Information Procedures Act (18 U.S.C. App.)) and a court reviews the finding or the imposition of the prohibition, condition, or penalty, the President may submit such information to the court ex parte and in camera.

#### (b) Rule of construction

Nothing in this section shall be construed—

(1) to confer or imply any right to judicial review of any finding under this subchapter, or any prohibition, condition, or penalty imposed as a result of any such finding; or

(2) to limit or restrict any other practice, procedure, right, remedy, or safeguard that—

(A) relates to the protection of classified information; and

(B) is available to the United States in connection with any type of administrative hearing, litigation, or other proceeding.

(Pub. L. 116–92, div. F, title LXXII, §7215, Dec. 20, 2019, 133 Stat. 2268.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

Section 1(a) of the Classified Information Procedures Act, referred to in subsec.(a), is section 1(a) of Pub. L. 95–456, Oct. 15, 1980, 94 Stat. 2025, which is set out in the Appendix to Title 18, Crimes and Criminal Procedure.

This subchapter, referred to in subsecs. (a) and (b)(1), was in the original "this subtitle", meaning subtitle A (§§7211–7217) of title LXXII of div. F of Pub. L. 116–92, which is classified principally to this subchapter. For complete classification of subtitle A to the Code, see Tables.

#### **Executive Documents**

#### Delegation of Functions

Functions and authorities of President under subsection (a) of this section delegated to Secretary of the Treasury, in consultation with the Secretary of State, by section 1(d)(viii) of Memorandum of President of the United States, Mar. 31, 2020, 85 F.R. 22343, set out as a note under section 2311 of this title.
§ 220.142 General information about work activity. ( a ) *The nature of the claimant's work.* If the claimant's duties require use of the claimant's experience, skills, supervision and responsibilities, or contribute substantially to the operation of a business, this tends to show that the claimant has the ability to work at the substantial gainful activity level.
( b ) *How well the claimant performs.* The Board considers how well the claimant does his or her work when the Board determines whether or not the claimant is doing substantial gainful activity. If the claimant does his or her work satisfactorily, this may show that the claimant is working at the substantial gainful activity level. If the claimant is unable, because of his or her impairments, to do ordinary or simple tasks satisfactorily without more supervision or assistance than is usually given other people doing similar work, this may show that the claimant is not working at the substantial gainful activity level. If the claimant is doing work that involves minimal duties that make little or no demands on the claimant and that are of little or no use to the claimant's railroad or non-railroad employer, or to the operation of a business if the claimant is self-employed, this does not show that the claimant is working at the substantial gainful activity level.
( c ) *If the claimant's work is done under special conditions.* Even though the work the claimant is doing takes into account his or her impairment, such as work done in a sheltered workshop or as a patient in a hospital, it may still show that the claimant has the necessary skills and ability to work at the substantial gainful activity level.
( d ) *If the claimant is self-employed.* Supervisory, managerial, advisory or other significant personal services that the claimant performs as a self-employed person may show that the claimant is able to do substantial gainful activity.
( e ) *Time spent in work.* While the time the claimant spends in work is important, the Board will not decide whether or not the claimant is doing substantial gainful activity only on that basis. The Board will still evaluate the work to decide whether it is substantial and gainful regardless of whether the claimant spends more time or less time at the job than workers who are not impaired and who are doing similar work as a regular means of their livelihood.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

DAY HIGH

 851

 867

 801

 771

 758

 822

 906

 975

 990

 993

 827

 887

 744

 710

 892

 885

 1,017

 815

 930

 828

 957

 888

 743

 597

 531

 491

 501

 494

 490

 509

 748

 684

 554

 538

 524

 513

 516

 509

 516

 494

 489

 482

 471

 474

 477

 490

 502

 516

 540

 534

 528

 527

 504

 491

 481

 405

 389

 384

 351

 356

 806

 773

 626

 591

 573

 578

 609

 620

 608

 582

 541

 540

 513

 523

 551

 572

 599

 599

 654

 611

 649

 628

 582

 523

 497

 472

 469

 463

 449

 463

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

APRIL 2014 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: June 6, 2014

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

DELTA MENDOTA CANAL AT CHECK 13 (O'NEILL)
### §§1901, 1902. Repealed. Pub. L. 93–618, title VI, §602(d), (e), Jan. 3, 1975, 88 Stat. 2072

Section 1901, Pub. L. 87–794, title III, §301, Oct. 11, 1962, 76 Stat. 883, provided for Tariff Commission [now United States International Trade Commission] investigations and reports. See section 2251 et seq. of this title.

Section 1902, Pub. L. 87–794, title III, §302, Oct. 11, 1962, 76 Stat. 885, covered Presidential action after Tariff Commission [now United States International Trade Commission] determination. See section 2252 et seq. of this title.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date of Repeal

Pub. L. 93–618, title VI, §602(e), Jan. 3, 1975, 88 Stat. 2072, provided in part that the repeals called for in section 602(e) of Pub. L. 93–618 [repealing sections 1901(a)(2), (3), (c), (d)(2), (f)(1), (3), 1902(b)(1), (2), (c) to (e), 1911 to 1915, 1917, 1931, 1941 to 1944, 1951, 1952, 1961 to 1963, and 1971 to 1978 of this title] are effective on the 90th day following Jan. 3, 1975.

The remaining parts of section 1901 [subsecs. (a)(1), (b), (d)(1), (e), (f)(2), and (g) of section 1901] and of section 1902 [subsec. (a) of section 1902] are repealed by section 602(d) of Pub. L. 93–618 without an effective date of repeal other than that of Pub. L. 93–618, which was approved on Jan. 3, 1975.
§ 225.36 Effect of DRC's on survivor annuities. ( a ) *Widow(er), remarried widow(er) or surviving divorced spouse.* Delayed retirement credits that the employee earned are used in computing the tier I component of a widow(er), remarried widow(er) or surviving divorced spouse annuity. All DRC's, including credits earned in the year of death, can be used in computing the widow(er) or surviving divorced spouse annuity beginning with the month of death. Delayed retirement credits for months up to, but not including, the month of death are used.
( b ) *Other survivor annuities.* Delayed retirement credits cannot be used in computing any other survivor annuity based on the deceased employee's record.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY HIGH

 760

 734

 745

 740

 724

 767

 766

 765

 818

 813

 760

 698

 756

 776

 776

 736

 790

 709

 751

 882

 949

 893

 909

 954

 975

 1,006

 934

 926

 1,116

 1,074

 1,156

 685

 676

 672

 677

 651

 648

 671

 696

 706

 698

 388

 363

 558

 563

 446

 343

 539

 433

 374

 612

 667

 700

 736

 714

 697

 388

 400

 389

 659

 668

 590

 721

 703

 699

 702

 679

 693

 711

 722

 753

 762

 652

 585

 642

 660

 649

 587

 659

 590

 612

 714

 741

 754

 790

 791

 817

 741

 686

 628

 784

 794

 765

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

DECEMBER 2014 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: January 6, 2015

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

DELTA MENDOTA CANAL AT CHECK 13 (O'NEILL)
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY

 58,645

 58,597

 58,923

 59,246

 59,180

 59,120

 59,038

 58,980

 58,927

 58,857

 58,785

 58,703

 58,617

 58,389

 57,990

 57,475

 57,370

 57,330

 56,917

 56,788

 56,402

 55,948

 55,455

 55,323

 55,259

 54,822

 54,310

 53,232

 52,604

 51,941

 51,266

 83,748

 83,140

 82,146

 81,127

 80,508

 79,844

 79,208

 78,548

 77,904

 77,248

 76,613

 75,975

 75,339

 74,880

 74,595

 74,376

 73,725

 73,059

 72,816

 72,158

 71,865

 71,496

 71,274

 70,634

 69,971

 69,719

 69,492

 69,794

 69,681

 69,605

 69,530

STORAGE - A.F. 

 142,393

 141,737

 141,069

 140,373

 139,688

 138,964

 138,246

 137,528

 136,831

 136,105

 135,398

 134,678

 133,956

 133,269

 132,585

 131,851

 131,095

 130,389

 129,733

 128,946

 128,267

 127,444

 126,729

 125,957

 125,230

 124,541

 123,802

 123,026

 122,285

 121,546

 120,796

823

849

542

619

638

706

768

877

886

795

726

930

987

472

748

714

655

624

663

733

756

726

710

677

647

786

1,000

755

683

834

715

484

518

205

268

293

341

406

515

535

429

370

567

623

126

403

344

274

268

332

336

414

311

350

288

280

439

627

364

309

461

337

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

AUGUST 2002 FULL NATURAL FLOW AT NEW MELONES DAM RUN DATE: 09/23/2002

TOTALS -22,269 11,817

* October 1, 23,439

 703.5

 704.6

 705.0

 705.5

 706.1

 706.8

 707.6

 708.6

 709.7

 710.5

 711.2

 712.4

 713.6

 713.8

 714.6

 715.3

 715.9

 716.4

 717.1

 717.7

 718.6

 719.2

 719.9

 720.4

 721.0

 721.9

 723.1

 723.8

 724.4

 725.4

 726.0

DONNELLS

RES

BEARDSLEY

RES

2001 TO DATE

NEW

MELONES

INFLOW

C.F.S

NATURAL

RIVER

C.F.S

ACCUM *

FULL

NATURAL

1000 A.F.

RESERVOIR

TOTAL

-672

-656

-668

-696

-685

-724

-718

-718

-697

-726

-707

-720

-722

-687

-684

-734

-756

-706

-656

-787

-679

-823

-715

-772

-727

-689

-739

-776

-741

-739

-750

CHANGE

A.F. C.F.S.

-339

-331

-337

-351

-345

-365

-362

-362

-351

-366

-356

-363

-364

-346

-345

-370

-381

-356

-331

-397

-342

-415

-360

-389

-367

-347

-373

-391

-374

-373

-378
Exhibit 99.1

                         ANNUAL STATEMENT OF COMPLIANCE


                      OFFICER'S CERTIFICATE OF THE SERVICER

In compliance with Section 4.04 (g) of the Indenture of Trust by and between
Nelnet Student Loan Trust 2005-2 and Zions First National Bank, as Trustee,
dated as of April 1, 2005, I, Terry J. Heimes, certify that:

     1.   A review of the activities of the Master Servicer during the preceding
          calendar year and of its performance under the Master Servicing
          Agreement has been made under my supervision; and

     2.   Based on my knowledge of such review, the Master Servicer has
          fulfilled all its obligations under the Master Servicing Agreement
          throughout such year.

March 20, 2006




By:     /s/ Terry J. Heimes
        --------------------------------
        Terry J. Heimes
        Chief Financial Officer,
        Treasurer,
        NELN, Inc.
Exhibit 23.1  Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm  We consent to the incorporation by reference in the following Registration Statements:  (1)Registration Statements and related prospectus (Form S-3 Nos. 333-165789, 333-145144, and 333-140525) of Global Partners LP, and (2)Registration Statements (Form S-8 Nos. 333-145579), pertaining to the Global Partners LP Long Term Incentive Plan;  of our reports dated March 11, 2011, with respect to the consolidated financial statements and schedule of Global Partners LP and the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting of Global Partners LP, included in this Annual Report (Form 10-K) of Global Partners LP for the year ended December 31, 2010.  /s/   Ernst & Young LLP  Boston, Massachusetts March 11, 2011
§ 220.55 Purchase of consultative examinations at the reconsideration level. ( a ) When a claimant requests a review of the Board's initial determination at the reconsideration level of review, consultative medical examinations will be obtained when needed, but not routinely. A consultative examination will not, if possible, be performed by the same physician or psychologist used in the initial claim.
( b ) Where the evidence tends to substantiate an affirmation of the initial denial but the claimant states that the treating physician or psychologist considers him or her to be disabled, the Board will assist the claimant in securing medical reports or records from the treating physician.
**Exhibit32.2**

CERTIFICATIONPURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with theAnnual Report of Tennessee Commerce Bancorp, Inc. (the “Corporation”) on Form10-K for the period ending December 31, 2006, as filed with the Securities andExchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, George W. Fort, ChiefFinancial Officer of the Corporation, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,that:

(1)           The Report fully complies with therequirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities and Exchange Act of1934; and

(2)           The information contained in theReport fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition andresults of operations of the Corporation.
|   | /s/ George W. Fort               |
|--------|----------------------------------|
|   | George W. Fort                   |
|   | Chief Financial Officer          |
|   | Tennessee Commerce Bancorp, Inc. |
|   | March 30, 2007                   |

 

----