alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Order entered March 31 , 2015

In The 

## Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

No. 05
- 14
- 00877
- CR No. 05
- 14
- 00878
- CR No. 05
- 14
- 00879
- CR No. 05
- 14
- 00880
- CR REGINALD KEITH PINK, Appellant

V. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee



### ORDER

Appellate cou nsel filed an Anders brief in these cases and provided appellant copies of the record. By letter dated November 5, 2014, this Court notified appellant that his pro se response was due by January 5, 2015. On January 5, 2015, the Court granted appellant an extension until February 4, 2015 to file the pro se response and warned that if the response was not received by that date, the appeals would be submitted on the Anders brief alone. The Court

now has before it appellant’s March 18, 2015 pro se “motion re questing hearing on issue of lost transcript,” in which appellant contends the record of a hearing that occurred between January 7, 2014 and January 27, 2014 is missing. To assist the Court in determining how to proceed, we ordered appellate counsel to fi le a response to the motion. Counsel filed a response stating that he reviewed the trial court’s docket sheet, spoke with the trial court judge, and contacted thecourt reporter, all of which confirmed no hearings were conducted in the time period appella nt

specified. Accordingly, w e DENY appellant’s March 18 , 2015 motion for a hear ing, as well as his March 25, 2015 motions to take notice of the missing records and to compel production of the docket sheets. Appellant was provided the record in September 20 14 for purposes of filing a pro se response, and was granted extensions until February 4, 2015 to file the response, but did not do so. Accordingly, we DENY appellant’s March 23, 2015 motion to reconsider our February 4, 2015 order denying him additional time to file his pro se response. The appeals will be submitted in due course. We DIRECT the Clerk to send copies of this order, by first

- class mail, to Reginald Pink, TDCJ No. 1938997, McConnell Unit, 3001 South Emily Drive, Beeville, Texas 78102.
We D IRECT the Clerk to send copies of this order, by electronic transmission, to counsel for all parties. /s/ LANA MYERS JUSTICE
EXHIBIT 32

                                   Vicom, Inc.

                Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350
                             As Adopted Pursuant to
                  Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

     In connection with this Quarterly Report Form 10-Q, Vicom, Inc. (the
"Company") for the period ended June 30, 2003, I, James L. Mandel, Chief
Executive Officer of the Company, hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:

1.   This Periodic Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a)
     or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d));
     and

2.   The information contained in the Periodic Report fairly presents, in all
     material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
     Company.

Date: August 14, 2003                  By:
                                                   /s/ James L. Mandel
                                                 Chief Executive Officer

     In connection with this Quarterly Report Form 10-Q, Vicom, Inc. (the
"Company") for the period ended June 30, 2003, I, Steven M. Bell, Secretary and
Treasurer of the Company, hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

1.   This Periodic Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a)
     or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d));
     and

2.   The information contained in the Periodic Report fairly presents, in all
     material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
     Company.

Date: August 14, 2003                  By:

                                                    /s/ Steven M. Bell
                                                 Chief Financial Officer

                                       22
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY

 36,709

 35,978

 35,522

 35,275

 35,071

 35,171

 35,050

 34,652

 35,189

 35,824

 36,345

 36,677

 37,113

 37,240

 37,223

 37,092

 37,183

 38,195

 40,375

 41,036

 41,446

 41,817

 41,999

 42,036

 42,270

 42,448

 42,489

 42,561

 42,991

 42,815

 42,051

 48,947

 49,091

 48,974

 48,691

 48,498

 48,338

 48,194

 48,326

 48,437

 48,625

 48,548

 48,426

 48,349

 48,504

 48,730

 48,830

 49,058

 50,177

 52,791

 53,930

 54,217

 54,258

 54,269

 54,297

 54,125

 53,895

 53,705

 53,660

 53,373

 53,379

 53,889

STORAGE - A.F. 

 85,656

 85,069

 84,496

 83,966

 83,569

 83,509

 83,244

 82,978

 83,626

 84,449

 84,893

 85,103

 85,462

 85,744

 85,953

 85,922

 86,241

 88,372

 93,166

 94,966

 95,663

 96,075

 96,268

 96,333

 96,395

 96,343

 96,194

 96,221

 96,364

 96,194

 95,940

1,209

1,122

1,058

1,098

1,220

1,688

1,245

1,304

1,568

1,587

1,558

1,541

1,205

1,943

1,971

1,564

2,190

7,932

10,810

6,289

3,951

3,245

2,705

2,345

2,625

2,822

2,361

3,009

8,486

3,599

2,572

888

826

769

831

1,020

1,658

1,111

1,170

1,895

2,002

1,782

1,647

1,389

2,085

2,076

1,548

2,351

9,006

13,227

7,196

4,302

3,453

2,802

2,378

2,656

2,796

2,286

3,023

8,558

3,513

2,444

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

DECEMBER 2010 FULL NATURAL FLOW AT NEW MELONES DAM RUN DATE: 01/04/2011

TOTALS +9,648 92,688

* October 1, 183,847

 96.5

 98.1

 99.6

 101.3

 103.3

 106.6

 108.8

 111.1

 114.9

 118.8

 122.4

 125.6

 128.4

 132.5

 136.6

 139.7

 144.4

 162.2

 188.5

 202.8

 211.3

 218.1

 223.7

 228.4

 233.7

 239.2

 243.8

 249.8

 266.7

 273.7

 278.5

DONNELLS

RES

BEARDSLEY

RES

2010 TO DATE

NEW

MELONES

INFLOW

C.F.S

NATURAL

RIVER

C.F.S

ACCUM *

FULL

NATURAL

1000 A.F.

RESERVOIR

TOTAL

-636

-587

-573

-530

-397

-60

-265

-266

+648

+823

+444

+210

+359

+282

+209

-31

+319

+2,131

+4,794

+1,800

+697

+412

+193

+65

+62

-52

-149

+27

+143

-170

-254

CHANGE

A.F. C.F.S.

-321

-296

-289

-267

-200

-30

-134

-134

+327

+415

+224

+106

+181

+142

+105

-16

+161

+1,074

+2,417

+907

+351

+208

+97

+33

+31

-26

-75

+14

+72

-86

-128
### SUBCHAPTER II—MEAT PROCESSORS AND RELATED INDUSTRIES
#### The People of the State of New York *ex*rel. University Place Apartments, Inc., Respondent, against Joseph Lilly et al., as Commissioners of Taxes and Assessments of the City of New York, Appellants. (Taxes for 1937-1938, 1938-1939, 1939-1940, 1940-1941.) The People of the State of New York ex rel. University Place Apartments, Inc., Respondent, against Joseph Lilly et al., as Commissioners of Taxes and Assessments of the City of New York, Appellants. (Taxes for 1941-1942.)

No opinion. Present ■—Martin, P. J., Townley, Dore, Cohn and Callahan, JJ.
§ 72.63 Conditions of sale. ( a ) *No recourse.* All personal property and carriers to be sold shall be offered for sale “as is” and without recourse against the United States.
( b ) *No guarantee.* No guarantee or warranty, expressed or implied, shall be given or understood in respect of any forfeited property or carrier offered for sale.
( c ) *No sale.* ( 1 ) The United States reserves the right to reject any and all bids received at public auction and in sealed, competitive bid sales.
( 2 ) When “no sale” is declared for property other than cigars, cigarettes, and cigarette papers and tubes, the Director or his delegate shall re-advertise the property for sale.
( 3 ) When “no sale” is declared for cigars, cigarettes, or cigarette papers or tubes, such property shall be destroyed or, if fit for human consumption, be given to a Federal or State hospital or institution.
( d ) *One bid.* When only one bid is received for a single unit of property or a carrier offered at public auction or in a sealed, competitive bid sale, such bid shall be considered to be and treated as the highest bid received for that property or carrier.
[T.D. ATF-9, 39 FR 9954, Mar. 15, 1974, as amended by T.D. ATF-183, 49 FR 37061, Sept. 21, 1984]
§ 10.900 What is the death gratuity under this subpart? ( a ) The death gratuity authorized by 5 U.S.C. 8102a and payable pursuant to the provisions of this subpart is a payment to a claimant who is an eligible survivor (as defined in §§ 10.906 and 10.907) or a designated alternate beneficiary (as defined in §§ 10.908 and 10.909) of an employee who dies of injuries incurred in connection with the employee's service with an Armed Force in a contingency operation. This payment was authorized by section 1105 of Public Law 110-181 (2008). For the purposes of this subchapter, the term “Armed Force” means the Army, Navy, Air Force, Marine Corps, and Coast Guard.
( b ) This death gratuity payment is a FECA benefit, as defined by § 10.5(a) of this part. All the provisions and definitions in this part apply to claims for payment under this subpart unless otherwise specified.
FILED

Jan. 1, 1996

Cecil Crowson, Jr.

Appellate Court Clerk

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE

WESTERN SECTION AT NASHVILLE

PENNY CAMPBELL, ET AL., )

)

Plaintiffs/Appellees, )

) Appeal No.

) 01-A-01-9507-CV-00321

VS. )

) Davidson Circuit

) No. 93C-1547

DON SUNDQUIST, Governor of )

the State of Tennessee, et al., )

)

Defendants/Appellants. )

PARTIAL DISSENT

I respectfully dissent from part I of the majority opinion holding that the

appellants have standing to maintain this action under the Declaratory Judgment Act.

In my opinion this case does not involve present rights that have accrued under

presently existing facts. See Dobbs v. Guenther, 846 S.W.2d 270 (Tenn. App. 1992).

None of the plaintiffs in this action have been prosecuted under the

HPA; none of them allege that they have even been threatened with prosecution.

They do allege that they fear they will be prosecuted for engaging in conduct

prohibited by the Act. I do not think such allegations give the plaintiffs a special

interest in the statute as opposed to the public in general. See Parks v. Alexander,

608 S.W.2d 881 (Tenn. App. 1980). All the complaint expresses is a fear that the

plaintffs will be prosecuted if they choose to violate the Act. Every member of the

public is affected in exactly the same way.
The plaintiffs' reliance on Erwin Billiard Parlor v. Buckner, 156 Tenn.

278, 300 S.W. 565 (1927) is misplaced. In that case the plaintiffs were the owners

and operators of a legal business that would be closed by the operation of the statute

in question. Their interests were different from the interests of the public at large.

They had a right under presently existing facts to challenge the constitutionality of the

statute. 

For these reasons the State's motion to dismiss should have been

granted.

II.

On the merits of this appeal, I concur in part III of the majority opinion.

___________________________________

BEN H. CANTRELL, JUDGE
Exhibit
32.2


Multiband
Corporation
 
 Certification
Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350
 As
Adopted Pursuant to
 Section
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002






In connection with this Quarterly
Report Form 10-Q,  Multiband Corporation (the Company) for the period
ended March 31, 2010, I, Steven M. Bell, Chief Financial Officer of the Company,
hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





1.
            This
      Periodic Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
      15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d));
      and


2.
            The
      information contained in the Periodic Report fairly presents, in all
      material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
      the Company.





Date:
      May 13, 2010
                        By:
                        /s/
      Steven M. BellChief
      Financial Officer
EXHIBIT 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




Pursuant to 18 U.S.C.  Section 1350,  as adopted  pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002, in connection  with the filing of the Annual Report
on Form 10-KSB for the Year Ended  December 31, 2006 (the  "Report") by People's
Liberation, Inc. ("Registrant"), each of the undersigned hereby certifies that:

1.       The Report fully  complies  with the  requirements  of section 13(a) or
         15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2.       The  information  contained  in  the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
         material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
         Registrant.






Date:  March 15, 2007              /s/ Daniel S. Guez
                                   -------------------------------
                                   Daniel S. Guez
                                   Chief Executive Officer






Date:  March 15, 2007              /s/ Darryn Barber
                                   -------------------------------
                                   Darryn Barber
                                   Chief Financial Officer

A signed  original of this  written  statement  required by Section 906 has been
provided to Peoples Liberation, Inc. and will be retained by Peoples Liberation,
Inc. and furnished to the Securities  and Exchange  Commission or its staff upon
request.
Editorial Note on Part 70
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 70 appear by T.D. ATF-450, 66 FR 29022-29030, May 29, 2001.

§ 70.421 Alcohol dealer registration. Every person who sells, or offers for sale, any alcohol product (distilled spirits, wines, or beer) fit for beverage use must register with the Alcohol and Tobacco Tax and Trade Bureau. The specific requirements are contained in the following regulations: ( a ) For proprietors of distilled spirits plants, parts 19 and 31 of this chapter;
( b ) For bonded wineries, bonded wine cellars, bonded wine warehouses, and taxpaid wine bottling houses, parts 24 and 31 of this chapter;
( c ) For brewers, parts 25 and 31 of this chapter;
( d ) For persons bringing distilled spirits, wines, or beer from Puerto Rico and the Virgin Islands to the United States, parts 26 and 31 of this chapter;
( e ) For importers of distilled spirits, wines, or beer, parts 27 and 31 of this chapter; and
( f ) For wholesalers and retailers of distilled spirits, wines, or beer, part 31 of this chapter.
[T.D. TTB-79, 74 FR 37424, July 28, 2009]
7/20/2015 2:19:05 PM Velva L. Price District Clerk Travis County CAUSE NO. D-1-GV-02-002501 D-1-GV-02-002501 THE STATE OF TEXAS, THE TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF INSURANCE, and THE TEXAS COMMISSIONER OF INSURANCE, Plaintiffs,
vs. FARMERS GROUP, INC., FARMERS UNDERWRITERS ASSOCIATION, FIRE UNDERWRITERS ASSOCIATION, FARMERS INSURANCE EXCHANGE, § § § § § § § § § § § FIRE INSURANCE EXCHANGE, TEXAS § FARMERS INSURANCE COMPANY, § MID-CENTURY INSURANCE COMPANY OF TEXAS, § MID-CENTURY INSURANCE COMPANY, § FARMERS TEXAS COUNTY MUTUALINSUR. CO., § TRUCK INSURANCE EXCHANGE, and § TRUCK UNDERWRITERS ASSOCIATION, § Defendants. § IN THE DISTRICT COURT

OFTRAVIS COUNTY, TEXAS

261STJUDICIALDISTRICT 

### Intervenors Gerald and Leslie Hooks's Notice ofInterlocutoryAppeal Intervenors Gerald and Leslie Hooks give notice of their desire to appeal from the Order of Preliminary Approval signed by this Court on 6 July 2015. This is an interlocutory appeal pursuant to§ 51.014 (a) (3) and§ 51.014 (b) Tex. Civ. Prac. 

### &Rem. Code which is directed to the Third Court ofAppeals as an accelerated appeal Respectfully submitted, 

### Joseph C. Blanks, P.C.,

By: Joseph C. Blanks,TBN 02456770, 

### PO Box 999, Doucette,Texas 75942.409-837-9707 fax 877-563-7052 Attorney for the Hooks Intervenors



### -1-CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I hereby certify that I served a true and correct copy ofthe foregoing document for the Hooks Intervenors upon all attomey(s) ofrecord, Joshua Godbey & Co., Richard Carrell, Marcie Hogan Greer, and ScottIncerto & Co., as well as Joe Longley and Phil Maxwell, all by fax on 18 July 2015. I also served Michael J. Woods by email on that day. I mailed a courtesy copy onpaperto the Court on 20 July 2015, as well.

Joseph C. Blanks
Joshua Godbey and James R. Wenzel; Office oftheAttorney General ofTexas

P.O. Box 12548, 209 West 14th Street,Austin, Texas 78711-2548 RichardN. Carrell, Norton Rose FulbrightL.L.P., fax 713-651-5246,

1301 McKinney, Suite 5100, Houston, Texas 77010-3095 M. Scott Incerto, Norton Rose FulbrightL.L.P., fax 512-536-4598,

98 SanJacinto Blvd., Suite 1100,Austin, Texas 78701 Marcy Hogan Greer, FirmUnknown, fax 512-482-9303

515 CongressAve., Suite 2350,Austin, Texas 78701 Joe K. Longley & Phil K. Maxwell,

1609 Shoal Creek Blvd., No. lOO,Austin, Texas 78701 Michael J. Woods,pro sepro

8620 N. New Braunfels, Suite 522, SanAntonio, Texas 78217. SaraWaitt, General Counsel Texas Department ofInsurance P. 

### 0. Box 149104,Austin, TX 78714-9104



### -2-
§ 9.182 Ribbon Ridge. ( a ) *Name.* The name of the viticultural area described in this section is “Ribbon Ridge.”
( b ) *Approved Maps.* The appropriate maps used to determine the boundaries of the Ribbon Ridge viticultural area are the following two United States Geological Survey (USGS), 1:24,000 scale, topographical maps (7.5 minute series). ( 1 ) Laurelwood Quadrangle, Oregon, 1956, photorevised 1978; and
( 2 ) Dundee Quadrangle, Oregon, 1956, revised 1993.
( c ) *Boundary.* The Ribbon Ridge viticultural area is located in northern Yamhill County, Oregon, northwest of the town of Dundee. ( 1 ) The beginning point is on the Laurelwood Quadrangle map at the intersection of a light-duty road known locally as Albertson Road and Dopp Road (named on the Dundee map), just east of the Lake View School, section 58, T2S, R3W. From the beginning point, the boundary line—
( 2 ) Continues south on Dopp Road for about 4.9 miles, crossing onto the Dundee map, to the road's intersection with North Valley Road, near the Erwin Young School, section 39, T3S, R3W (Dundee Quadrangle); then
( 3 ) Continues west then north on North Valley Road for about 5 miles, crossing over to the Laurelwood map, to the road's intersection with Laughlin and Albertson Roads, just west of the Lake View School, section 58, T2S, R3W (Laurelwood Quadrangle); then
( 4 ) Continues east on Albertson Road for about 0.2 miles and returns to the beginning point.
[T.D. TTB-27, 70 FR 31344, June 1, 2005]
### SUBCHAPTER V—DRUG EDUCATION
---

Exhibit 99.10

March 31, 2017

CONSENT OF GERRIT VOS

United States Securities and Exchange Commission

In connection with Silver Wheaton Corp.s (the Company)
Annual Report on Form 40-F for the year ended December 31, 2016 (the Annual
Report), I, Gerrit Vos, hereby consent to the inclusion in, or incorporation by
reference into, the Annual Report and the Companys Registration Statement on
Form S-8 (File No. 333-128128), Form F-10 (File No. 333-203682) and Form F-3D
(File No. 333-194702), of the following:

| | 1. | Salobo Operations, Para State, Brazil, NI 43-101
      Technical Report that has an effective date of 31 December,
  2015
| | -- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|Yours truly,       | 
|------------------ | 
|                   | 
|/s/ Gerrit Vos     | 
|Gerrit Vos, P. Eng | 

---
### §7904. School prayer

#### (a) Guidance

The Secretary shall provide and revise guidance, not later than September 1, 2002, and of every second year thereafter, to State educational agencies, local educational agencies, and the public on constitutionally protected prayer in public elementary schools and secondary schools, including making the guidance available by electronic means, including by posting the guidance on the Department's website in a clear and easily accessible manner. The guidance shall be reviewed, prior to distribution, by the Office of Legal Counsel of the Department of Justice for verification that the guidance represents the current state of the law concerning constitutionally protected prayer in public elementary schools and secondary schools.

#### (b) Certification

As a condition of receiving funds under this chapter, a local educational agency shall certify in writing to the State educational agency involved that no policy of the local educational agency prevents, or otherwise denies participation in, constitutionally protected prayer in public elementary schools and secondary schools, as detailed in the guidance required under subsection (a). The certification shall be provided by October 1 of each year. The State educational agency shall report to the Secretary by November 1 of each year a list of those local educational agencies that have not filed the certification or against which complaints have been made to the State educational agency that the local educational agencies are not in compliance with this section.

#### (c) Enforcement

The Secretary is authorized and directed to effectuate subsection (b) by issuing, and securing compliance with, rules or orders with respect to a local educational agency that fails to certify, or is found to have certified in bad faith, that no policy of the local educational agency prevents, or otherwise denies participation in, constitutionally protected prayer in public elementary schools and secondary schools.

(Pub. L. 89–10, title VIII, §8524, formerly title IX, §9524, as added Pub. L. 107–110, title IX, §901, Jan. 8, 2002, 115 Stat. 1980; renumbered title VIII, §8524, and amended Pub. L. 114–95, title VIII, §§8001(a)(6), 8021, Dec. 10, 2015, 129 Stat. 2088, 2089, 2112.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Prior Provisions

A prior section 7904, Pub. L. 89–10, title IX, §9204, as added Pub. L. 103–382, title I, §101, Oct. 20, 1994, 108 Stat. 3798, established the Native Hawaiian Education Council and island councils, prior to the general amendment of former subchapter IX of this chapter by Pub. L. 107–110.

#### Amendments

2015—Subsec. (a). Pub. L. 114–95, §8021, substituted "by electronic means, including by posting the guidance on the Department's website in a clear and easily accessible manner" for "on the Internet".

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date of 2015 Amendment

Amendment by Pub. L. 114–95 effective Dec. 10, 2015, except with respect to certain noncompetitive programs and competitive programs, see section 5 of Pub. L. 114–95, set out as a note under section 6301 of this title.
EXHIBIT 23.1

CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT CERTIFIED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANT-GRANT THORNTON LLP 



Consent of Independent Certified Public Accountants



We have issued our report dated January 12, 1998 accompanying the 
consolidated financial statements incorporated by reference in the 
Annual Report of Granite State Bankshares, Inc. and Subsidiary on Form 
10-K for the year ended December 31, 1997.  We hereby consent to the 
incorporation by reference of said report in the Registration Statements
of Granite State Bankshares, Inc. and Subsidiary on Form S-8 (File No. 
33-57720, effective February 1, 1993) and on Form S-8 (File No.
333-42287, effective December 15, 1997).


                                            /s/ Grant Thornton LLP

Boston, Massachusetts
March 27, 1998