alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### § 1002.54 Are all military fitness examinations considered “service in the uniformed services?”

Yes. USERRA's definition of “service in the uniformed services” includes a period for which an employee is absent from a position of employment for the purpose of an examination to determine his or her fitness to perform duty in the uniformed services. Military fitness examinations can address more than physical or medical fitness, and include evaluations for mental, educational, and other types of fitness. Any examination to determine an employee's fitness for service is covered, whether it is an initial or recurring examination. For example, a periodic medical examination required of a Reserve component member to determine fitness for continued service is covered.
HILLS BANCORPORATION
                                   EXHIBIT 11
                    COMPUTATION OF EARNINGS PER COMMON SHARE

<TABLE>

                                         Three Months Ended         Nine months Ended
                                            September 30               September 30
                                       -----------------------   -----------------------
                                          1996         1995         1996         1995
                                       ----------    ---------   ----------   ----------
<S>                                    <C>           <C>         <C>          <C>


Shares of common stock, beginning ..    1,463,604    1,463,319    1,463,604    1,463,319
    Shares issued during this period         --           --           --
                                       ----------   ----------   ----------   ----------
Shares of common stock, ending .....    1,463,604    1,463,319    1,463,604    1,463,319
                                       ==========   ==========   ==========   ==========



Weighted average number of shares ..    1,476,374    1,472,448    1,476,847    1,472,496
                                       ==========   ==========   ==========   ==========
    outstanding #



Earnings and Earnings per share:

    Net income (in thousands) ......   $    1,580   $    1,439   $    4,561   $    3,822
                                       ==========   ==========   ==========   ==========

    Earnings per common share ......   $     1.07   $      .98   $     3.09   $     2.60
                                       ==========   ==========   ==========   ==========
</TABLE>


#   Computation of weighted average number of shares include  equivalent  shares
    attributable to stock options  granted in 1993,  computed under the treasury
    stock method.
Phone Log for Atrazine Special Review Docket 

Page 1 of 1

January 5, 2011, afternoon

Melanie Biscoe and Anne Overstreet of EPA/OPP called Dan Campbell of Syngenta. 

During the conversation, Dan Campbell confirmed that Syngenta will be able to provide 

Community Water System data for the Atrazine Monitoring Program and the Simazine 

Monitoring Program in spreadsheet format by the end of January 2011. 

Phone Log prepared by – Melanie Biscoe
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

DAY HIGH

 638

 658

 662

 744

 770

 772

 802

 829

 821

 797

 794

 822

 895

 948

 961

 967

 981

 961

 857

 982

 963

 971

 957

 929

 893

 906

 886

 894

 941

 577

 596

 613

 625

 652

 645

 630

 625

 592

 543

 531

 520

 510

 483

 471

 454

 441

 427

 405

 390

 406

 411

 396

 390

 371

 368

 369

 375

 393

 611

 621

 632

 679

 709

 713

 702

 721

 683

 659

 650

 635

 687

 667

 650

 619

 595

 561

 510

 592

 595

 610

 592

 575

 543

 541

 534

 520

 566

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

FEBRUARY 2016 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: March 3, 2016

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

DELTA MENDOTA CANAL AT CHECK 13 (O'NEILL)
(No. 74-CC-109

#### Interroyal Corporation, Claimant, *vs.*State of Illinois, Environmental Protection Agency, Respondent.

*Opinion filed December 3, 1973.*

Interroyal Corporation, Claimant, pro se.

William J. Scott, Attorney General; William E. Webber, Assistant Attorney General, for Respondent.

*158Per Curiam.
### §7351b. Applications

#### (a) In general

Each State educational agency or specially qualified agency desiring to receive a grant under this subpart shall submit an application to the Secretary at such time and in such manner as the Secretary may require.

#### (b) Contents

Each application submitted under subsection (a) shall include information on—

(1) program objectives and outcomes for activities under this subpart, including how the State educational agency or specially qualified agency will use funds to help all students meet the challenging State academic standards;

(2) if the State educational agency will competitively award grants to eligible local educational agencies, as described in section 7351(b)(3)(A) of this title, the application under the section shall include—

(A) the methods and criteria the State educational agency will use to review applications and award funds to local educational agencies on a competitive basis; and

(B) how the State educational agency will notify eligible local educational agencies of the grant competition; and

(3) a description of how the State educational agency will provide technical assistance to eligible local educational agencies to help such agencies implement the activities described in section 7351a of this title.

(Pub. L. 89–10, title V, §5223, formerly title VI, §6223, as added Pub. L. 107–110, title VI, §601, Jan. 8, 2002, 115 Stat. 1895; renumbered title V, §5223, and amended Pub. L. 114–95, title V, §§5001(a)(4), 5003(6), Dec. 10, 2015, 129 Stat. 2039, 2040, 2044.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Prior Provisions

A prior section 5223 of Pub. L. 89–10 was classified to section 7223b of this title, prior to repeal by Pub. L. 114–95.

#### Amendments

2015—Subsec. (a). Pub. L. 114–95, §5003(6)(A), substituted "at such time and in such manner" for "at such time, in such manner, and accompanied by such information".

Subsec. (b). Pub. L. 114–95, §5003(6)(B), added subsec. (b) and struck out former subsec. (b) which described required contents for applications submitted under subsec. (a).

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date of 2015 Amendment

Amendment by Pub. L. 114–95 effective Dec. 10, 2015, except with respect to certain noncompetitive programs and competitive programs, see section 5 of Pub. L. 114–95, set out as a note under section 6301 of this title.
```

[Congressional Bills 114th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 3696 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

114th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 3696

  To amend title XVIII of the Social Security Act to prevent Medicare 
           part B premium and deductible increases for 2016.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            October 7, 2015

  Ms. Titus introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
 Committee on Energy and Commerce, and in addition to the Committee on 
   Ways and Means, for a period to be subsequently determined by the 
  Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall 
           within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To amend title XVIII of the Social Security Act to prevent Medicare 
           part B premium and deductible increases for 2016.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Medicare Premium Fairness Act of 
2015''.

SEC. 2. PREVENTING MEDICARE PART B PREMIUM AND DEDUCTIBLE INCREASES FOR 
              2016.

    (a) In General.--Section 1839(a) of the Social Security Act (42 
U.S.C. 1395r(a)) is amended--
            (1) in the second sentence of paragraph (1), by striking 
        ``Such'' and inserting ``Subject to paragraph (5), such''; and
            (2) by adding at the end the following new paragraph:
    ``(5) In applying this part (including subsection (i) and section 
1833(b)), the monthly actuarial rate for enrollees age 65 and over for 
2016 shall be equal to the monthly actuarial rate for such enrollees 
for 2015.''.
    (b) Conforming Funding.--Section 1844(a) of the Social Security Act 
(42 U.S.C. 1395w(a)) is amended--
            (1) in paragraph (3), by striking the period at the end and 
        inserting ``; plus''; and
            (2) by adding at the end the following:
            ``(4) a Government contribution equal to, as estimated by 
        the Chief Actuary of the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid 
        Services, the reduction in aggregate premiums payable for a 
        month under this part that is attributable to the application 
        of section 1839(a)(5) with respect to--
                    ``(A) enrollees age 65 and over; and
                    ``(B) enrollees under age 65.
In applying paragraph (1), the government contribution under paragraph 
(4) with respect to enrollees described in subparagraphs (A) and (B) of 
such paragraph (4) shall be treated as premiums payable and deposited 
in the Trust Fund under subparagraphs (A) and (B), respectively, of 
paragraph (1).''.
                                 <all>
```
§ 771.82 Evidence. The Federal Rules of Evidence are not binding on these proceedings. However, any relevant evidence that would be admissible under the rules of evidence governing civil proceedings in matters not involving trial by jury in the Courts of the United States shall be admissible. The administrative law judge may relax such rules in any hearing when in his judgment such relaxation would not impair the rights of either party and would more speedily conclude the hearing or would better serve the ends of justice. However, the administrative law judge shall provide for the exclusion of irrelevant, immaterial, or unduly repetitious evidence. Every party shall have the right to present his case or defense by oral or documentary evidence, depositions, or duly authenticated copies of records and documents; to submit rebuttal evidence; and to conduct such reasonable cross-examination as may be required for a full and true disclosure of the facts. ( a ) *Witnesses.* The administrative law judge shall have the right in his discretion to limit the number of witnesses whose testimony may be merely cumulative and shall, as a matter of policy, not only exclude irrelevant, immaterial, or unduly repetitious evidence but shall also limit the cross-examination of witnesses to that required for a full and true disclosure of the facts so as not to unnecessarily prolong the hearing and unduly burden the record. Opinion or expert testimony shall be admitted when the administrative law judge is satisfied that the witness is properly qualified as defined by Federal Rules of Evidence 701 or 702.
( b ) *Documentary evidence.* Material and relevant evidence shall not be excluded because it is not the best evidence unless its authenticity is challenged, in which case reasonable time shall be given to establish its authenticity. When only portions of a document are to be relied upon, the offering party shall prepare the pertinent excerpts, adequately identified, and shall supply copies of such excerpts, together with a statement indicating the purpose for which such materials will be offered, to the administrative law judge and to the other parties. Only the excerpts, so prepared and submitted, shall be received in the record. However, the whole of the original document should be made available for examination and for use by opposing counsel for purposes of cross-examination. Compilations, charts, summaries of data, and photocopies of documents may be admitted in evidence if the proceedings will thereby be expedited, and if the material upon which they are based is available for examination by the parties. Objections to the evidence shall be in short form, stating the grounds relied upon. The transcript shall not include argument or debate on objections, except as ordered by the administrative law judge, but shall include the rulings thereon. Where official notice is taken of a material fact not appearing in the evidence in the record, any party shall, on timely request, be afforded an opportunity to controvert such fact.
( c ) *Hearsay.* Probative, material, and reliable hearsay evidence is admissible in proceedings under this subpart.
#### Arnold Schaar, Respondent, v. Swiss Bank Corporation, Appellant et al., Defendants.

Present — Martin, P. J., Townley, Untermyer, Dore and Callahan, JJ.
### §80d. Authorization of appropriations

There are authorized to be appropriated to the Smithsonian Institution such sums as may be necessary for the purposes of this subchapter.

(Pub. L. 87–186, §5, Aug. 30, 1961, 75 Stat. 415.)
_______________________________________ __ Michigan Supreme Court 

# Order

Lansing, Michigan

May 30, 2007 Clifford W. Taylor, Chief Justice
133423 Michael F. Cavanagh Elizabeth A. Weaver Marilyn Kelly Maura D. Corrigan PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Plaintiff-Appellee, Robert P. Young, Jr. Stephen J. Markman, Justices

v SC: 133423 COA: 275007 Barry CC: 06-100088-FH LONNIE LEE MANN, Defendant-Appellant.

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the January 23, 2007 order of the Court of Appeals is consider ed, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the question presented s hould be reviewed by this Court.

p0521 I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

May 30, 2007

Clerk
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY ELEV

 863.38

 863.31

 863.25

 863.43

 863.44

 863.35

 863.27

 863.38

 863.42

 863.41

 863.41

 863.44

 863.57

 863.35

 863.21

 863.25

 863.17

 862.87

 862.70

 862.60

 862.19

 861.98

 861.61

 861.07

 860.50

 860.15

 859.96

 859.91

 859.71

 859.87

 859.73

 527.4

 527.1

 526.8

 527.7

 527.7

 527.3

 526.9

 527.4

 527.6

 527.6

 527.6

 527.7

 528.3

 527.3

 526.6

 526.8

 526.4

 525.0

 524.1

 523.7

 521.7

 520.7

 518.9

 516.3

 513.6

 512.0

 511.1

 510.8

 509.9

 510.6

 510.0

STORAGE

-1.0

-0.3

-0.3

+0.9

+0.0

-0.4

-0.4

+0.5

+0.2

+0.0

+0.0

+0.1

+0.6

-1.1

-0.7

+0.2

-0.4

-1.4

-0.8

-0.5

-2.0

-1.0

-1.8

-2.6

-2.7

-1.7

-0.9

-0.2

-0.9

+0.8

-0.7

CHANGE

585

554

653

523

573

597

622

586

600

585

772

764

801

710

639

1,106

1,378

581

703

671

682

737

677

488

467

373

524

933

765

1,139

1,005

INFLOW

 1,055

 685

 771

 62

 527

 779

 761

 249

 503

 572

 731

 658

 443

 1,223

 975

 989

 1,568

 1,301

 1,092

 886

 1,653

 1,221

 1,545

 1,767

 1,816

 1,194

 956

 1,052

 1,206

 740

 1,323

POWER

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

SPILL

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

OUTLET

 42

 39

 28

 22

 22

 37

 56

 69

 0

 37

 41

 33

 41

 23

 5

 20

 5

 9

 22

 28

 22

 25

 23

 22

 17

 17

 23

 0

 35

 18

 15

C.F.S.

 .27

 .25

 .18

 .14

 .14

 .24

 .36

 .44

 .00

 .24

 .26

 .21

 .26

 .15

 .03

 .13

 .03

 .06

 .14

 .18

 .14

 .16

 .15

 .14

 .11

 .11

 .15

 .00

 .23

 .12

 .10

INCHES

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .37

 .54

 1.85

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .06

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .89

 .54

 .35

 .84

PRECIP

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

OCTOBER 2016 NEW MELONES LAKE DAILY OPERATIONS RUN DATE: November 1, 2016

IN LAKE

EVAPORATION

INCHES

C.F.S.

COMPUTED*

1000 ACRE-FEET

RELEASE - C.F.S.

TOTALS -18.5 21,793 30,303 0 0 796 5.12 5.44

ACRE-FEET -18,500 43,226 60,106 0 0 1,579

COMMENTS:

* COMPUTED INFLOW IS THE SUM OF CHANGE IN STORAGE, RELEASES AND EVAPORATION.

SUMMARY

RELEASE (ACRE-FEET)

POWER 60,106

SPILL 0

OUTLET

TOTAL

 0

 60,106

PRECIPITATION

THIS MONTH =

TO DATE =

 5.44

JULY 1, 2016 5.45

 528.4

Table 13 

OCT 1, 2016 TO DATE = 5.44
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Homeland Security

###### U.S. Customs and Border Protection 

# AGENCY:

U.S. Customs and Border Protection, Department of Homeland Security. 

# ACTION:

Notice of accreditation and approval of Oiltest, Inc., as a commercial gauger and laboratory.

# SUMMARY:

                        Notice is hereby given that, pursuant to 19 CFR 151.12 and 19 CFR 151.13, Oiltest, Inc., 109 Aldene Road, Building 7, Roselle, NJ 07203, has been approved to gauge and accredited to test petroleum and petroleum products for customs purposes, in accordance with the provisions of 19 CFR 151.12 and 19 CFR 151.13. Anyone wishing to employ this entity to conduct laboratory analyses and gauger services should request and receive written assurances from the entity that it is accredited or approved by the U.S. Customs and Border Protection to conduct the specific test or gauger service requested. Alternatively, inquires regarding the specific test or gauger service this entity is accredited or approved to perform may be directed to the U.S. Customs and Border Protection by calling (202) 344-1060. The inquiry may also be sent to                         *cbp.labhq@dhs.gov.*                         Please reference the Web site listed below for a complete listing of CBP approved gaugers and accredited laboratories.                         *http://cbp.gov/​xp/​cgov/​import/​operations_​support/​labs_​scientific_​svcs/​commercial_​gaugers/​*

# DATES:

The accreditation and approval of Oiltest, Inc., as commercial gauger and laboratory became effective on November 22, 2010. The next triennial inspection date will be scheduled for November 2013. 

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Anthony Malana, Laboratories and Scientific Services, U.S. Customs and Border Protection, 1300 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW., Suite 1500N, Washington, DC 20229, 202-344-1060. 

Dated: April 1, 2011. 

Ira S. Reese, 

Executive Director, Laboratories and Scientific Services.

[FR Doc. 2011-8691 Filed 4-11-11; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 9111-14-P
---

Exhibit 99.19

March 27, 2012

CONSENT OF GEORGE EVEN

United States Securities and Exchange Commission

Gentlemen:

In connection with Silver Wheaton Corp.s (the Company)
Annual Report on Form 40-F for the year ended December 31, 2011 (the Annual
Report), I, George Even, MAusIMM, Principal Partner (SRK Consulting (Chile),
S.A.), hereby consent to the inclusion in, or incorporation by reference into,
the Annual Report and the Companys Registration Statements on Form S-8 (File
No. 333-128128) and Form F-10 (File No. 333-167567), of the following:

| | 1. | Geological review of the Pascua-Lama Project;                                                                                                                                                                     
| | -- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| | 2. | Technical report dated October 28, 2009, entitled
      Amended NI 43-101, Technical Report, Pascua-Lama Project, Region III,
      Chile / San Juan Province, Argentina addressed to Silver Wheaton
      Corp.

Yours truly,

/s/ George Even

George Even, MAusIMM 
  Principal Partner 
  SRK Consulting (Chile), S.A.

---
Advisory Fee Agreement


EXHIBIT 10.3

V3 Capital Partners, LLC

 




January 18, 2015




Sibling Group Holdings, Inc.

901 Mopac Expressway South, suite 300

Austin, TX  78746




Re:

Advisory Fee Agreement




Dear Mr. Brian Oliver Smith:




This letter is to confirm the advisory fee agreement between Sibling Group Holdings, Inc. (the “Company”) and V3 Capital Partners, LLC or its designee (the “Advisor”), in connection with the advisory, due diligence and financing activities performed by the Advisor relating to a transaction between the Company and Shenzhen City Qisnhai Xinshi Education Management Co., LTD and its subsidiaries and other institutional investors (the “Transaction”).




Upon the closing of the Transaction, the Company shall immediately pay the Advisor, or its designee, the following:




a.

Cash payment of $557,000 for the purchase of the initial notes under the Transaction;

b.

Units for $312,000 upon same terms and conditions of Units issued under the Transaction; and

c.

50% warrant coverage on the aggregate initial notes issued under the Transaction.  




In addition, the Company agrees to pay (i) the Advisor a pro rata portion of each of the fees above on the exercise of any warrants issued under the Transaction, and (ii) $100,000 of Shenzhen City Qisnhai Xinshi Education Management Co., LTD and Advisor’s legal and due diligence expenses.  The Advisor shall have the right, at its option, to offset the amounts due under this agreement from the amount its participates in the Transactiion.




This letter shall be a binding agreement between the Company and the Advisor and shall be governed under New York law.




		
	 
	Very truly yours,


	 
	 

	 
	 

	 
	_______________________


	 
	Scot Cohen


	 
	Authorized Officer







ACKNOWLEDGED AND AGREED TO:




Sibling Group Holdings, Inc.




By:________________________

Name:

Brian OliverSmith

Title:

Chief Executive Officer