alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY ELEV

 1,900.27

 1,900.62

 1,900.76

 1,901.61

 1,900.24

 1,900.30

 1,900.66

 1,900.54

 1,900.80

 1,900.46

 1,900.68

 1,900.64

 1,900.56

 1,900.39

 1,900.25

 1,900.46

 1,900.44

 1,900.44

 1,900.41

 1,900.72

 1,900.37

 1,900.73

 1,900.38

 1,900.46

 1,900.20

 1,900.51

 1,900.54

 1,900.48

 1,900.54

 1,900.38

 1,900.25

 13,374

 13,631

 13,734

 14,367

 13,352

 13,396

 13,661

 13,572

 13,764

 13,514

 13,675

 13,646

 13,587

 13,462

 13,359

 13,514

 13,499

 13,499

 13,477

 13,705

 13,447

 13,712

 13,455

 13,514

 13,322

 13,550

 13,572

 13,528

 13,572

 13,455

 13,359

STORAGE

-746

+257

+103

+633

-1,015

+44

+265

-89

+192

-250

+161

-29

-59

-125

-103

+155

-15

+0

-22

+228

-258

+265

-257

+59

-192

+228

+22

-44

+44

-117

-96

CHANGE

2,658

3,053

2,906

1,981

2,257

2,773

2,841

2,809

2,883

2,597

2,808

2,857

2,606

2,586

2,606

2,626

2,635

2,632

2,653

2,764

2,524

2,785

2,524

2,357

1,978

2,033

1,831

1,666

1,700

1,818

1,525

INFLOW

 80

 80

 80

 80

 80

 80

 80

 80

 80

 80

 80

 80

 80

 80

 80

 80

 80

 80

 80

 80

 80

 80

 80

 80

 80

 80

 80

 80

 80

 80

 80

POWER

 595

 469

 470

 301

 270

 278

 283

 284

 284

 287

 286

 288

 289

 287

 287

 286

 288

 286

 288

 289

 290

 289

 291

 292

 292

 292

 288

 287

 289

 290

 292

SPILL

 89

 89

 89

 89

 89

 89

 89

 89

 89

 89

 89

 89

 89

 89

 89

 89

 89

 89

 89

 89

 89

 89

 89

 89

 89

 89

 89

 89

 89

 89

 89

OUTLETS

 7

 9

 7

 5

 6

 3

 3

 6

 3

 6

 5

 5

 3

 2

 3

 3

 3

 4

 6

 4

 4

 3

 3

 5

 5

 6

 4

 5

 5

 5

 4

C.F.S.

 .33

 .41

 .31

 .24

 .29

 .14

 .14

 .28

 .16

 .30

 .24

 .23

 .14

 .10

 .15

 .12

 .14

 .20

 .30

 .19

 .19

 .14

 .14

 .24

 .21

 .27

 .20

 .22

 .24

 .24

 .18

INCHES

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

AUGUST 2021 LEWISTON LAKE DAILY OPERATIONS RUN DATE: September 1, 2021

IN LAKE

EVAPORATION

C.F.S. FRANCIS CARR

COMPUTED*

ACRE-FEET

RELEASE - C.F.S. 

TOTALS -761 76,272 2,480 2,759 9,587 142 6.68

ACRE-FEET -761 151,286 4,919 5,472 19,016 282

* COMPUTED INFLOW IS THE SUM OF CHANGE IN STORAGE, RELEASES AND EVAPORATION.

(1) OUTLET RELEASE INCLUDES FISH RELEASE.

(2) INCHES OF EVAPORATION TAKEN FROM PAN AT TRINITY RIVER HATCHERY.

SUMMARY

RELEASE (ACRE-FEET)

TOTAL POWER 4,919

TOTAL RIVER 29,407 151,765

 14,120

 122,358

RIVER

JUDGE FRANCIS CARR POWERPLANT

TOTAL RELEASE

JUDGE (2)

(1) POWERPLANT

 2,263

 2,276

 2,208

 1,187

 2,324

 2,301

 2,252

 2,395

 2,330

 2,261

 2,267

 2,410

 2,175

 2,191

 2,199

 2,090

 2,183

 2,173

 2,201

 2,187

 2,191

 2,190

 2,191

 1,861

 1,609

 1,451

 1,359

 1,227

 1,215

 1,413

 1,108

 61,688

 122,358
November 2022

STORAGE INFLOW- C.F.S. RELEASE - C.F.S. GAINS(+)

ACRE-FEET O'NEILL S.LUIS CALIF. O'NEILL

S.LUIS DOS AMIGOS * OR LOSS

(-)

DAY ELEV IN LAKE CHANGE PUMPING GEN. AQUEDUCT GEN. PUMPING PUMPING DELIV. C.F.S.

49,447

1 222.15 48,783 -664 0 507 290 761 0 591 221

2 222.15 48,783 0 0 1,013 52 720 0 0 -345

3 222.32 49,235 452 0 504 479 759 0 0 4

4 222.27 49,102 -133 0 1,009 99 779 0 357 -39

5 222.57 49,900 798 0 1,007 176 663 0 160 42

6 222.26 49,075 -825 0 503 14 464 483 0 15

7 222.46 49,607 532 0 1,007 663 347 604 416 -34

8 223.36 52,009 2,402 28 1,007 831 221 605 0 171

9 223.22 51,634 -375 321 0 1,749 115 2,190 0 46

10 222.39 49,421 -2,213 672 0 1,312 0 3,046 0 -54

11 221.80 47,861 -1,560 632 0 611 0 1,908 0 -122

12 221.00 45,760 -2,101 341 0 870 0 1,887 301 -83

13 220.51 44,479 -1,281 316 0 846 0 1,169 577 -62

14 220.94 45,603 1,124 312 0 934 0 642 0 -37

15 221.00 45,760 157 161 0 787 0 936 0 67

16 221.39 46,784 1,024 204 0 401 92 0 0 4

17 221.91 48,150 1,366 389 510 414 162 0 521 58

18 221.47 46,994 -1,156 396 0 52 181 471 316 -64

19 221.83 47,940 946 405 0 193 146 0 0 25

20 221.60 47,336 -604 561 0 203 113 940 0 -15

21 221.61 47,362 26 681 0 314 50 940 0 9

22 221.84 47,966 604 646 0 114 0 470 0 14

23 221.80 47,861 -105 521 0 269 35 470 249 -90

24 221.48 47,020 -841 114 0 633 220 470 521 39

25 221.50 47,073 53 153 0 572 232 470 0 4

26 221.60 47,336 263 210 0 629 265 469 0 27

27 221.21 46,311 -1,025 82 0 376 259 467 263 14

28 221.49 47,046 735 87 513 116 263 0 0 -84

29 221.45 46,941 -105 91 0 0 232 0 0 88

30 221.92 48,176 1,235 76 510 210 176 0 0 3

TOTALS -1,271 7,399 8,090 14,209 7,255 18,637 4,272 -178

ACRE-FEET -1,271 14,677 16,047 28,192 14,395 36,963 8,473 105 -356

* DAILY DEL. FIGURES UNAVAILABLE. TOT. DEL. IS INCLUDED IN COMPUTING MONTHLY TOTALS

SUMMARY

Release (ACRE-FEET)

O'Neill Generation 14,395 Dos Amigos Pump 8,473

San Luis Pump 36,963 Deliveries 105

Total 59936

Historical Archive and Report Database

Consolidated State-Federal O'Neill Forebay 

Daily Operations

Run Date: 1/5/2024
STEAM ELECTRIC

DUMMY REPLACEMENT PAGE

EPA-HQ-OW-2009-0819

DCN:
5

10

10

10

PINE AVE

ID L E W IL D E R D

ID L E W IL D E R D

QUEEN ANNE'S CO

A

N

N

E

A

R

U

N

D

E

L

C

O

Q

U

E

E

N

A

N

N

E'S

C

O

TALBOT CO

TALBOT

CO

CHESAPEAKE

BAY

CHESAPEAKE BAY

CHESAPEAKE BAY

CHESAPEAKE

BAY

Flag

Pond

Kent

Point

Manor

Kent

Point

Farm

Idlewilde

Snug

Harbor

Valliant

Cedarhurst

Columbia Beach

Kent Point Manor

Cedarhurst

Felicity

Cove

Columbia

Beach

Jefferson

Poplar Island

Island

Bloody

Point

Horseshoe

Point

Franklin

Point

Curtis

Point

North

Point

Deale Deale OE E

Kent

Island

North

Beach

South

River Annapolis

Chesapeake

Bay 1 (All

Water)

Tilghman

Claiborne

3

43

79

91

00

42

UH

E

76°

52' 52'

43

00

3

02

42

90

43

3

3

43

N

000 FEET 72 80

93

43

3 3

94

42

97

UJ

42

73

42

70

43

76

98

27'

27'

01

3 77 3

30" 30"

72

30' 30"

FEET

30" 30"

25'

38°

30'

UH

000m

02

47' 47'

3

03

96

42

99

E

98

1

43

3

43

4294

97

42

92

95

42

460

70 79

42

80

01

42

3 3

45'

000m 3 3

42

3

42

93

N

78

38°

30"

75

42

25'

000m

73 3

50'

74

3

92

3

50'

95

71

91

3

42

76

22'

22'

45'

3 74

000m

71

03

42

42

38°

38°

76°

76°

99

76°

UJ

96

42

30" 75

30"

78

42

3

FEET

000

400

1 490

000

000 FEET

440

U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U. S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY

MARYLAND

ADJOINING 7.5' QUADRANGLES

QUADRANGLE LOCATION

DEALE OE E, MD

2011

Interstate Route State Route

ROAD CLASSIFICATION

Ramp 4WD

US Route Local Road

WX Interstate Route /. US Route H State Route

DEALE OE E QUADRANGLE

MARYLAND

7.5-MINUTE SERIES

This map was produced to conform with version 0.5.10

of the USGS US Topo Product Standard.

A metadata file associated with this product is draft version 0.5.15

CONTOUR INTERVAL 10 FEET

NORTH AMERICAN VERTICAL DATUM OF 1988

SCALE 1:24 000

1 0.5 0

MILES

1

1000 0 1000 2000 3000 4000 5000 6000 7000 8000 9000 10000

FEET

1000 500 0 METERS 1000 2000

1 0.5 0 KILOMETERS 1 2

Imagery................................NAIP, July 2009 - August 2009

Roads...............................................©2006-2010 Tele Atlas

Names...............................................................GNIS, 2010

Hydrography.................National Hydrography Dataset, 2009

Contours.............................National Elevation Dataset, 2007

Boundaries..............Census, IBWC, IBC, USGS, 1972 - 2010

North American Datum of 1983 (NAD83)

World Geodetic System of 1984 (WGS84). Projection and

1 000-meter grid: Universal Transverse Mercator, Zone 18S

Produced by the United States Geological Survey

10 000-foot ticks: Maryland Coordinate System of 1983

U.S. National Grid

100,000-m Square ID

Grid Zone Designation

UJ

UH

43 00

18S

×

Ø

MN

GN

UTM GRID AND 2011 MAGNETIC NORTH DECLINATION AT CENTER OF SHEET

0° 54 ́ 16 MILS

11° 9 ́ 198 MILS
#### § 1002.306 Is a National Guard civilian technician considered a State or Federal employee for purposes of USERRA?

A National Guard civilian technician is considered a State employee for USERRA purposes, although he or she is considered a Federal employee for most other purposes.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

DAY HIGH

 168

 165

 168

 157

 154

 150

 155

 163

 166

 170

 189

 180

 180

 182

 178

 157

 156

 142

 136

 134

 141

 140

 134

 132

 122

 139

 131

 127

 154

 134

 148

 146

 149

 143

 135

 131

 124

 135

 146

 152

 165

 162

 160

 161

 158

 133

 129

 130

 120

 121

 121

 119

 119

 119

 112

 111

 115

 110

 112

 109

 159

 155

 156

 150

 142

 139

 138

 149

 156

 162

 174

 169

 167

 170

 168

 147

 141

 138

 129

 127

 130

 129

 127

 123

 116

 126

 122

 118

 136

 120

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

JUNE 2000 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: July 12, 2000

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

GREENS LANDING ON THE SACRAMENTO RIVER
I 

114TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 3726 

To amend title 23, United States Code, to authorize States to issue special 

permits to allow the operation of vehicles of up to 95,000 pounds on 

Interstate System highways for the hauling of livestock. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

OCTOBER 8, 2015 

Mr. ROONEY of Florida introduced the following bill; which was referred to 

the Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure 

A BILL 

To amend title 23, United States Code, to authorize States 

to issue special permits to allow the operation of vehicles 

of up to 95,000 pounds on Interstate System highways 

for the hauling of livestock. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Highway Exceptions 

5 for Ranchers’ Deliveries Act of 2015’’. 


asabaliauskas on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 3726 IH

1 SEC. 2. VEHICLE WEIGHT LIMITATIONS FOR INTERSTATE 

2 SYSTEM HIGHWAYS. 

3 Section 127(a) of title 23, United States Code, is 

4 amended by adding at the end the following: 

5 ‘‘(13) HAULING OF LIVESTOCK.—A State may 

6 allow, by special permit, the operation of vehicles 

7 with a gross vehicle weight of up to 95,000 pounds 

8 for the hauling of livestock. The cost of a special 

9 permit issued under this paragraph may not exceed 

10 $200 per year for a livestock trailer.’’. 

Æ 


asabaliauskas on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with BILLS
**Exhibit 31**I, Jerome B. Van Orman, Jr., certify that:1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K, and all reports on Form 8-Kcontaining distribution or servicing reports filed in respect of periods included inthe year covered by this annual report, of Capital Auto Receivables Asset Trust2005-SN1.2. Based on my knowledge, the information in these reports, taken as a whole,does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a materialfact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under whichsuch statements were made, not misleading as of the last day of the period covered bythis annual report;3. Based on my knowledge, the distribution or servicing information required tobe provided to the trustee by the servicer under the pooling and servicing, orsimilar, agreement, for inclusion in these reports is included in these reports;4. I am responsible for reviewing the activities performed by the servicer underthe pooling and servicing, or similar, agreement and based upon my knowledge and theannual compliance review required under that agreement, and except as disclosed in thereports, the servicer has fulfilled its obligations under that agreement; and5. The reports disclose all significant deficiencies relating to the servicer’scompliance with the minimum servicing standards based upon the report provided by anindependent public accountant, after conducting a review in compliance with theUniform Single Attestation Program for Mortgage Bankers or similar procedure, as setforth in the pooling and servicing, or similar, agreement, that is included in thesereports.Date:March 31, 2006*/s/ Jerome B. Van Orman, Jr.*Jerome B. Van Orman, Jr.
SERVED: April 27, 2015 

U.S. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 

OFFICE OF HEARINGS 

WASHINGTON, DC 

IN THE MATTER OF 

MARCO FIMBRES 

DOCKET NO. FAA 2015 - 0204 

(Civil Penalty Action) 

ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE 

- _.:_ -:·~;,:Er-.~: c\~ 

I . . - •· - - -~ • • 

··- ,, . . . . ~ 

.. - ~ ·-· .- -~-! ~-~:;.-~.\J'. 

The Federal Aviation Administration (hereinafter "FAA") filed a Complaint dated 

February 19, 2015. *, (hereinafter "Respondent") filed a Request for Hearing dated 

January 26, 2015. Respondent filed an Answer dated *. We served our Procedural Order 

on*. 

On*, the FAA filed a Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings. 

Respondent has failed to file an Answer to the Complaint, failed to file a response 

.to our Procedural Order and failed to respond to the Agency's Motion for Judgment on 

the Pleadings. 

WHEREFORE, it be and is hereby ORDERED as follows: 

I. On or before *, Respondent shall file a response to this Order stating why 

the relief requested in the Agency's Motion should not be granted; and 

2. On or before *, Respondent shall answer the Complaint; and 

3. On or before*, Respondent shall fui"ly comply with our Procedural Order; 

and 

4. Absent full and complete responses to paragraphs I, 2 and 3 hereinabove, 

Respondent may be sanctioned including, but not limited to, allegations in the Complaint 

may be deemed admitted; and/or Respondent may be precluded from introducing any 

evidence at the hearing other than his own testimony; and/or Respondent's Request for 

Hearing may be dismissed; and/or a Default Judgment may be entered against 

Respondent in the full amount of the fine requested by the Agency in its Complaint. 

Richard C. Goodwin 

U.S. Administrative Law Judge 

Attachment- Service List 
SERVICE LIST- BY U.S. MAIL 

ORIGINAL & ONE COPY 

Federal Aviation Administration 

800 Independence Avenue, S. W. 

Washington, DC 20591 

Attention: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430 

Wilbur Wright Building-Suite 2W10001 

Marco A. Fimbres, Respondent 

4444 East Benson Highway, Trir 21 

Tucson, AZ 85706 

Lierre Green, Complainant's Counsel 

ONE COPY 

Attorney, Office of the Regional Counsel, A WP-7.6 

Western-Pacific Region 

Federal Aviation Administration 

P. 0. Box 92007 

Los Angeles, CA 90009-2007 

TEL: 31 0-725-7117 

FAX: 310-725-6816 

The Honorable Richard C. Goodwin, Administrative Law Judge 

Office of Hearings, M-20 

U.S. Department of Transportation 

1200 New Jersey Avenue, S.E. (E11-310) 

Washington, DC 20590 

TEL: 202-366-5121 Staff Assistant 

FAX: 202-366-7536 

Docket No. FAA-20 15-0204 

(Civil Penalty Action) 

1 Service was by U.S. Mail. For service in person or by expedited courier, use the following address: Federal 

Aviation Administration, 600 Independence Avenue. S.W., Wilbur Wright Building-Suite 2WIOOO. Washington. 

DC 20591; Attention: Hearing Docket Clerk. AGC-430. 

2
#### § 209.10 Terminated employers' reports.

When an employer's status as an employer is terminated, a final report of creditable service and compensation shall be made. The final report shall be submitted to the Board on or before the last day of the month following the final month for which there was compensated service. The report shall be completed as prescribed in § 209.8(a) of this part and shall be marked Final Compensation Report.

(Approved by the Office of Management and Budget under control number 3220-0008)

[49 FR 46729, Nov. 28, 1984. Redesignated and amended at 63 FR 32613, June 15, 1998]
John D. Blunt, 

Petitioner, 

v. 

Paul H. Schultz, 

Respondent. 

'UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA 

FILED 

DEC f 7 2009 

Clerk, U.S. District and 

Bankruptcy Courts 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

Civil Action No. d9 ~;j80 

MEMORANDUM OPINION 

This action, brought pro se, is before the Court on the petitioner's application for a writ of 

habeas corpus, accompanied by an application to proceed in forma pauperis. The Court will 

grant the application to proceed in forma pauperis and will dismiss the case for lack of 

jurisdiction. 

Petitioner is a prisoner at the Federal Correctional Institution in Fairton, New Jersey, 

serving 40 years to life for two counts of murder and related offenses. He challenges his 

convictions following a jury trial in the Superior Court of the District of Columbia. See Pet. at 3. 

Petitioner claims that he was denied effective assistance of counsel at trial and that he is 

innocent. 

It is established that challenges to a Superior Court judgment of conviction must be 

pursued in that court under D.C. Code § 23-110, see Blair-Bey v. Quick, 151 F.3d 1036, 1042-43 

(D.C. Cir. 1998); Byrdv. Henderson, 119 F.3d 34,36-37 (D.C. Cir. 1997), and that absent a 

showing of an inadequate or ineffective local remedy, "a District of Columbia prisoner has no 

recourse to a federal judicial forum." Garris v. Lindsay, 794 F.2d 722, 726 (D.C. Cir. 1986), 

3 
cert. denied, 479 U.S. 993 (1986) (internal footnote omitted). Under District of Columbia law, 

[ an] application for a writ of habeas corpus in behalf of a prisoner who is authorized to 

apply for relief by motion pursuant to this section shall not be entertained by ... any 

Federal ... court if it appears ... that the Superior Court has denied him relief, unless 

it also appears that the remedy by motion is inadequate or ineffective to test the 

legality of his detention. 

D.C. Code §23-11 O(g). The Superior Court and the D.C. Court of Appeals have entertained 

petitioner's collateral challenges to his conviction. See Pet. at 4,6-7. Petitioner's lack of success 

in those courts, however, does not render his local remedy inadequate or ineffective, see Garris 

v. Lindsay, 794 F.2d at 727; Charles v. Chandler, 180 F.3d 753, 756-58 (6th Cir. 1999) (citing 

cases), and petitioner has provided no other basis for finding the local remedy inadequate. This 

Court therefore lacks authority to entertain the petition. 

accompanies this Memorandum Opinion. 

Date: Decembe/1-, 2009 

2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

DAY HIGH

 344

 316

 283

 282

 300

 307

 291

 281

 322

 353

 354

 343

 365

 356

 326

 299

 255

 249

 251

 229

 234

 284

 311

 310

 347

 356

 332

 320

 249

 276

 272

 262

 275

 263

 231

 230

 250

 249

 256

 277

 259

 251

 244

 238

 230

 227

 208

 206

 211

 214

 253

 261

 282

 302

 280

 250

 297

 292

 279

 274

 284

 288

 271

 261

 277

 295

 299

 305

 306

 303

 294

 273

 245

 239

 228

 219

 223

 254

 281

 288

 312

 328

 301

 277

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

FEBRUARY 2017 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: March 1, 2017

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

DELTA MENDOTA CANAL AT CHECK 13 (O'NEILL)
## Court of Appeals Sixth Appellate District of Texas

J U D G M E N T

Joseph Emmanuel Watkins, Appellant

No. 06

- 16

- 00054

- CR v.
The State of Texas, Appellee Appeal from the 13th District Court of Navarro County, Texas (Tr. Ct. No. D34763CR ). Memorandum Opinion deliver ed by Justice Moseley, Chief Justice Morriss and Justice Burgess participating.

As stated in the Court’s opinion of this date, we find no error in the judgment of the court

below

. We affirm the judgment of the trial court

. We note that the appellant, Joseph Emmanuel Watkins, has adequately indicated his inability to pay costs of appeal. Therefore, we waive payment of costs.

R ENDERED DECEMBER 21, 2016 BY ORDER OF THE COURT JOSH R. MORRISS, III CHIEF JUSTICE

ATTEST: Debra K. Autrey, Clerk
June 2024

STORAGE INFLOW- C.F.S. RELEASE - C.F.S. GAINS(+)

ACRE-FEET O'NEILL S.LUIS CALIF. O'NEILL S.LUIS DOS AMIGOS * OR LOSS(-)

DAY ELEV IN LAKE CHANGE PUMPING GEN. AQUEDUCT GEN. PUMPING PUMPING DELIV. C.F.S.

47,441

1 220.88 45,446 -1,995 1,077 2,085 986 280 0 4,615 -258

2 221.42 46,863 1,417 1,149 3,103 1,240 0 1,405 3,167 -207

TOTALS -578 2,226 5,188 2,226 280 1,405 7,782 -465

ACRE-FEET -578 4,416 10,291 4,415 556 2,787 15,435 0 -922

* DAILY DEL. FIGURES UNAVAILABLE. TOT. DEL. IS INCLUDED IN COMPUTING MONTHLY TOTALS

SUMMARY

Release (ACRE-FEET)

O'Neill Generation 556 Dos Amigos Pump 15,435

San Luis Pump 2,787 Deliveries 0

Total 18,778

Historical Archive and Report Database

Consolidated State-Federal O'Neill Forebay 

Daily Operations

Run Date: 6/3/2024
Ewell

East of

Reedville

Smith

Point

East of

Fleets Bay

Fleets

Bay

Reedville

Burgess

West of

Nandua

Creek

Goose

Island

ADJOINING 7.5' QUADRANGLES

.

.

. . .

..

.

. .

.

.

..

.

.

. . . . . . . . .

.. . . .

10

10

REEDVILLE - TANGIER ISLAND

REEDVILLE - TANGIER ISLAND

TAYLORS BEACH RD

RTE-802

ACCO

MACK

CO

N

O

RTH

UM

B

E

RLAND

CO

ACCO

MAC

K

CO

NO

RTH

UM

B

E

RLAN

D

CO

N

O

RT

H

UM

B

E

RLAN

D

C

O

Rock

Hole

Gaskin

Pond

Chesapeake

Bay

Chesapeake

Beach

Neals Beach

4

82

41

41

99 E

88

00

98 000 FEET 45'

30"

41

94

92

000 FEET

30"

76°

E

41

3

95 12

90

VG

41

850

UG

30"

41

94

41

FEET

UG 3

89

98

41

90

41

84

41

41

00

07' 3 3 97 3

86

000m

92

85

91

41

41

30"

3

87

81

47'

41

12'

93

76°

90

86

41

07'

47'

93 3

000m

91

96 76° 3

12' 3

10' 3

80

3

79

10'

000m

95

45'

41

91

30"

3

N

37°

15'

000

3

82

41

810

30"

52'

000

81

41

140

160

87

91

N

000m

50'

81

4183

41

41

41

89

30"

52' 92 397

83

85

41

12

FEET

41

37°

76°

37°

41

15'

37°

96

30"

41

50'

3

3

3

84

3

80

88

41

4

41

VG 3

EAST OF REEDVILLE, VA

2013

Expressway Local Connector

ROAD CLASSIFICATION

Ramp 4WD

Secondary Hwy Local Road

WX Interstate Route /. US Route H State Route

EAST OF REEDVILLE QUADRANGLE

VIRGINIA

7.5-MINUTE SERIES

U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U. S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY

VIRGINIA

QUADRANGLE LOCATION

This map was produced to conform with the

National Geospatial Program US Topo Product Standard, 2011.

A metadata file associated with this product is draft version 0.6.11

CONTOUR INTERVAL 10 FEET

NORTH AMERICAN VERTICAL DATUM OF 1988

SCALE 1:24 000

1 0.5 0

MILES

1

1000 0 1000 2000 3000 4000 5000 6000 7000 8000 9000 10000

FEET

1000 500 0 METERS 1000 2000

1 0.5 0 KILOMETERS 1 2

Imagery...................................................NAIP, May 2012

Roads..............................................©2006-2012 TomTom

Names..........................................................GNIS, 2013

Hydrography....................National Hydrography Dataset, 2012

Contours............................National Elevation Dataset, 1999

Boundaries....................Census, IBWC, IBC, USGS, 1972 - 2012

North American Datum of 1983 (NAD83)

World Geodetic System of 1984 (WGS84). Projection and

1 000-meter grid: Universal Transverse Mercator, Zone 18S

Produced by the United States Geological Survey

10 000-foot ticks: Virginia Coordinate System of 1983 (south

zone)

U.S. National Grid

100,000-m Square ID

Grid Zone Designation

UG VG

400

18S

×

Ø

MN

GN

UTM GRID AND 2013 MAGNETIC NORTH DECLINATION AT CENTER OF SHEET

0° 44 ́

13 MILS

11° 4 ́

197 MILS
#### § 1001.142 Stationing of DVOP staff.

DVOP specialists shall be stationed at various locations in accordance with 38 U.S.C. 2003A(b)(2).