alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

DAY ELEV

 1,900.79

 1,901.16

 1,901.02

 1,901.52

 1,901.23

 1,901.50

 1,901.06

 1,900.77

 1,900.60

 1,900.26

 1,900.25

 1,900.30

 1,900.24

 1,900.38

 1,900.48

 1,900.56

 1,900.65

 1,900.26

 1,900.30

 1,900.50

 1,900.72

 1,901.31

 1,901.43

 1,901.20

 1,901.49

 1,900.95

 1,901.07

 1,900.96

 1,900.58

 1,900.28

 13,756

 14,031

 13,926

 14,300

 14,083

 14,285

 13,956

 13,742

 13,617

 13,366

 13,359

 13,396

 13,352

 13,455

 13,528

 13,587

 13,653

 13,366

 13,396

 13,543

 13,705

 14,143

 14,233

 14,061

 14,278

 13,874

 13,963

 13,882

 13,602

 13,381

STORAGE

-67

+275

-105

+374

-217

+202

-329

-214

-125

-251

-7

+37

-44

+103

+73

+59

+66

-287

+30

+147

+162

+438

+90

-172

+217

-404

+89

-81

-280

-221

CHANGE

3,498

3,945

4,059

3,285

3,060

3,176

3,507

3,509

3,605

3,492

3,444

3,534

3,612

3,404

3,512

3,752

4,199

4,162

4,371

4,534

4,549

4,383

4,408

4,467

4,544

4,430

4,568

4,695

4,767

4,162

INFLOW

 80

 80

 80

 80

 80

 80

 80

 80

 80

 80

 80

 80

 80

 80

 80

 77

 80

 80

 80

 80

 80

 80

 80

 80

 80

 80

 80

 80

 80

 80

POWER

 2,930

 2,948

 2,947

 2,948

 2,947

 2,947

 2,250

 2,158

 2,126

 2,111

 1,988

 1,855

 1,930

 1,874

 1,875

 2,219

 2,622

 2,622

 2,622

 2,622

 2,622

 2,623

 2,623

 2,622

 2,622

 2,622

 2,622

 2,622

 2,622

 2,375

SPILL

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 28

 50

 50

 50

 50

 50

 50

 50

 52

 62

 62

 62

 62

 62

 62

 62

 62

 62

 62

 62

 62

 62

 62

OUTLETS

 3

 3

 4

 1

 0

 3

 3

 5

 5

 6

 5

 4

 7

 6

 6

 6

 7

 5

 6

 7

 6

 7

 6

 7

 4

 9

 7

 0

 0

 4

C.F.S.

 .12

 .12

 .18

 .05

 .00

 .12

 .15

 .24

 .25

 .29

 .25

 .17

 .31

 .26

 .28

 .30

 .33

 .24

 .28

 .34

 .27

 .31

 .28

 .33

 .16

 .40

 .31

 .00

 .00

 .17

INCHES

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

JUNE 2011 LEWISTON LAKE DAILY OPERATIONS RUN DATE: July 1, 2011

IN LAKE

EVAPORATION

C.F.S. FRANCIS CARR

COMPUTED*

ACRE-FEET

RELEASE - C.F.S. 

TOTALS -442 118,633 2,397 1,298 74,516 142 6.51

ACRE-FEET -442 235,309 4,754 2,575 147,802 282

* COMPUTED INFLOW IS THE SUM OF CHANGE IN STORAGE, RELEASES AND EVAPORATION.

(1) OUTLET RELEASE INCLUDES THE CONTINUOUS FISH RELEASE OF 75 C.F.S.

(2) INCHES OF EVAPORATION TAKEN FROM PAN AT TRINITY RIVER HATCHERY

SUMMARY

RELEASE (ACRE-FEET)

TOTAL POWER 4,754

TOTAL RIVER 155,131 235,469

 13,823

 80,338

RIVER

JUDGE FRANCIS CARR POWERPLANT

TOTAL RELEASE

JUDGE (2)

(1) POWERPLANT

 519

 775

 1,081

 67

 142

 44

 1,340

 1,346

 1,407

 1,372

 1,325

 1,526

 1,567

 1,342

 1,464

 1,368

 1,395

 1,538

 1,586

 1,689

 1,697

 1,390

 1,592

 1,783

 1,667

 1,861

 1,752

 1,972

 2,144

 1,752

 40,503

 80,338
```

[Congressional Bills 116th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 5660 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

116th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 5660

   To amend title 23, United States Code, to ensure that each State 
 receives an aggregate apportionment equal to at least 100 percent of 
the estimated tax payments attributable to certain highway users in the 
                     State, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            January 21, 2020

   Mr. Roy introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
             Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
   To amend title 23, United States Code, to ensure that each State 
 receives an aggregate apportionment equal to at least 100 percent of 
the estimated tax payments attributable to certain highway users in the 
                     State, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. APPORTIONMENT.

    Section 104(c)(1)(B) of title 23, United States Code, is amended by 
striking ``95'' and inserting ``100''.
                                 <all>
```
#### § 10.737 How is a LEO claim filed, and who can file a LEO claim?

A claim for injury or occupational disease should be filed on Form CA-721; a death claim should be filed on Form CA-722. All claims should be submitted to the officer's employer for completion and forwarding to OWCP. A claim may be filed by the officer, the officer's survivor, or any person or association authorized to act on behalf of an officer or an officer's survivors.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY HIGH

 16,543

 16,553

 17,075

 18,657

 20,735

 21,049

 21,133

 19,717

 19,016

 15,506

 12,351

 12,346

 13,206

 14,101

 15,488

 15,820

 17,637

 17,373

 16,540

 17,563

 18,085

 18,600

 17,241

 17,496

 16,374

 15,036

 16,713

 14,833

 15,672

 16,196

 17,854

 6,061

 6,383

 6,127

 5,671

 5,279

 4,437

 4,124

 3,902

 3,447

 3,119

 2,112

 2,655

 2,616

 4,195

 5,266

 4,870

 4,597

 2,948

 2,644

 2,524

 2,849

 2,546

 2,385

 2,690

 2,723

 2,782

 3,087

 4,089

 4,521

 5,133

 5,292

 11,047

 10,921

 11,471

 12,173

 12,875

 12,499

 12,317

 11,471

 10,950

 9,190

 8,137

 7,855

 8,457

 8,718

 9,312

 9,722

 10,251

 9,253

 9,100

 9,629

 10,098

 9,953

 9,663

 9,872

 10,021

 9,197

 10,601

 10,309

 9,705

 9,583

 11,059

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

MAY 2004 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: June 8, 2004

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

PORT CHICAGO BOTTOM IN SUISUN BAY
EXHIBIT 32





CERTIFICATION OF PERIODIC FINANCIAL REPORT BY THE CHIEF EXECUTIVE





OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER





PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002











Solely for the purposes of complying with 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, we, the undersigned Acting Chief Executive Officer and the Chief Financial Officer of Save the World Air, Inc. (the “Company”), hereby certify, based on our knowledge, that the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the quarter ended September 30, 2010 (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.











Date: November 15, 2010
/s/ CECIL BOND KYTECecil Bond KyteChief Executive OfficerDate: November 15, 2010
/s/ EUGENE E. EICHLEREugene E. EichlerInterim Chief Financial Officer
#### § 228.12 Computation of the tier I annuity component of a child's insurance annuity.

The tier I annuity component of a child's insurance annuity is 75 percent of the PIA computed under § 228.10 of this part. The amount may be adjusted for the family maximum. See § 228.14 of this part.
#### Crete Mills, Respondent, v. Fred Colin et al., Appellants, et al., Defendants.

No opinion. The date for the examination to proceed to be fixed in the order. Settle order on notice. Present—Martin, P. J., Townley, Untermyer, Dore and Cohn, JJ.
Exhibit 4.2
 FORM OF ANNUAL GRANT AGREEMENT
 
 Grant Notice Award Agreement Company Plan Vested Shares Award
  Company Stock




---



##### 



.
 (a) Data
 (b)
 (c)
 (d)
  2




---



##### 



3
*Pursuant to 5

TH CIR. R. 47.5, the Court has determined that this opinion should not

be published and is not precedent except underthe limited circumstancessetforth in 5

TH

CIR. R. 47.5.4.

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No.98-20229

Summary Calendar

STEVEN WAYNE JANISZYN,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus

GALAND MOSER; THE CITY OF BAYTOWN

POLICE DEPARTMENT,

Defendants-Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Texas

(H-96-CV-1434)

February 10, 1999

Before POLITZ, JOLLY, and DUHÉ, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

StevenWayne Janiszyn, a Texas state prisoner, appeals adverse judgments

dismissing part of his claims and granting summary judgment against him in his

42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint. Our review of the record and briefs persuades that

the challenged judgmentsshould be affirmed on the basis ofthe facts as detailed,

authorities cited and analysis made by the district court in its Memorandum and
 

1 Avatar Exploration, Inc. v. Chevron, U.S.A., Inc., 933 F.2d 314 (5th Cir. 1991).

 

2 Woods v. Smith, 60 F.3d 1161, 1166 (5th Cir. 1995) (quoting Cain v. Lane, 857 F.2d

1139, 1143 n.6 (7th Cir. 1998)).

2

Opinion signed May 30, 1997 and filed June 3, 1997, and Order on summary

judgment signed on February 27, 1998 and filed March 2, 1998.

In addition to the claims asserted in his complaint, Janiszyn filed a

document in the trial court in which he seeks the suspension of a detective

involved in his arrest and conviction and complains of adverse impacts on his

parole board standing and in a civil proceeding involving his parental

relationship with a presumed son. Viewing this document as a proposed

amendment to his complaint, we find it patently frivolous and subject to

dismissal.1 A complainant may not rely on pure conclusional allegations of

retaliation but “must produce direct evidence of motivation or, the more

probable scenario, ‘allege a chronology of events from which retaliation may

plausibly be inferred.’”2 The record is devoid of any factual allegations

supportive of the broad conclusional charges of retaliation or improper

intervention.

Before this court Janiszyn files motions to supplement the record, for

appointment of counsel, and for a restraining order. We find no validity in any

of these motions and they are, accordingly, DENIED.

The judgments appealed are AFFIRMED.
§ 10.821 How are hearings assigned and scheduled? ( a ) If the deciding official receives a timely request for hearing, the OWCP representative shall refer the matter to the Chief Administrative Law Judge of the Department of Labor, who shall assign it for an expedited hearing. The administrative law judge assigned to the matter shall consider the request for hearing, act on all requests therein, and issue a Notice of Hearing and Hearing Schedule for the conduct of the hearing. A copy of the hearing notice shall be served on the provider by certified mail, return receipt requested. The Notice of Hearing and Hearing Schedule shall include: ( 1 ) A ruling on each item raised in the request for hearing;
( 2 ) A schedule for the prompt disposition of all preliminary matters, including requests for the certification of questions to advisory bodies; and
( 3 ) A scheduled hearing date not less than 30 days after the date the schedule is issued, and not less than 15 days after the scheduled conclusion of preliminary matters, provided that the specific time and place of the hearing may be set on 10 days' notice.
( b ) The provider is entitled to be heard on any matter placed in issue by his or her response to the Notice of Intent to Exclude, and may designate “all issues” for purposes of hearing. However, a specific designation of issues is required if the provider wishes to interpose affirmative defenses, or request the issuance of subpoenas or the certification of questions for an advisory opinion.
#### Herbert W. Hamlin, Respondent, v. Francisco Vagnoni et al., Appellants.

Orders unanimously affirmed, with $20 costs and disbursements. No opinion. Present — Peck, P. J., Glennon, Dore, Yan Yoorhis and Shientag, JJ.
SERVED: AUGUST 22, 2014
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION OFFICE OFHEARINGS

WASHINGTON, DC
IN THE MATTER OF JOHN WALSH DOCKETNO. FAA-2014-0548 (Civil Penalty Action)

NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT OF PROCEEDING**<~** "J ;_**~**•.i'**·~;:**

This proceeding (heretofore designated as Case No. 2014S0190111) has been assignedto Administrative Law Judge J.E. Sullivan. All future pleadings and other communications regarding this proceeding shall be served on the Judge, the FAA Hearing Docket, andthe other

Attachment

- Service ListSERVICE LIST- BY U.S. MAIL ORIGINAL & ONE COPY Federal Aviation Administration 800 Independence Avenue, S.W. Washington, DC 20591 Attention: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430 Wilbur Wright Building-Suite 2W1000 1 ONE COPY
Stuart A. Goldstein, Respondent's Counsel Stuart A. Goldstein, P.A 7300 North Kendall Drive, Suite 380 Miami, FL 33156 TEL: 305-670-1222 FAX: 305-400-0685 Christopher R. Stevenson, Complainant's Counsel Office ofthe Regional Counsel, AS0-7 Federal Aviation Administration, Southern Region 1701 ColumbiaAvenue College Park, GA 30337 TEL: 404-305-5200 FAX: 404-305-5223 Hon. J.E. Sullivan,Administrative Law Judge Office ofHearings, M-20 U.S. Department ofTransportation 1200 NewJersey Avenue, S.E. (E11-310) Washington, DC 20590 TEL: 202-366-6941 FAX: 202-366-7536 Docket No. FAA-20 14-0548 (Civil Penalty Action)

1 Service was by U.S. Mail. For service in person or by expedited courier, use the following address: Federal Aviation Administration, 600 Independence Avenue, S.W., Wilbur Wright Building-Suite 2Wl000, Washington, DC 20591; Attention: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC--430. 

### -2-
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 12.1


                            PACCAR Financial Corp.

               COMPUTATION OF RATIO OF EARNINGS TO FIXED CHARGES
                    PURSUANT TO SEC REPORTING REQUIREMENTS
                            (Thousands of Dollars)

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>

                                                 Nine Months Ended
                                                   September 30
                                                 1998          1997
                                               --------      --------
<S>                                            <C>           <C>
FIXED CHARGES
  Interest expense                             $ 82,774      $ 75,238
  Portion of rentals deemed interest                528           187
                                               --------      --------

TOTAL FIXED CHARGES                            $ 83,302      $ 75,425
                                               --------      --------
                                               --------      --------

EARNINGS
  Income before taxes                          $ 35,944      $ 38,451
  Fixed charges                                  83,302        75,425
                                               --------      --------

EARNINGS AS DEFINED                            $119,246      $113,876
                                               --------      --------
                                               --------      --------

RATIO OF EARNINGS TO FIXED CHARGES                1.43x         1.51x
</TABLE>

The method of computing the ratio of earnings to fixed charges shown above 
complies with SEC reporting requirements but differs from the method called for
in the Support Agreement between the Company and PACCAR Inc. See Exhibit 12.2.


                                     -13-
#### § 203.4 When service is compensated.

Service shall be “compensated” if it is performed for compensation, as that term is defined in part 222 of this chapter: *Provided, however,* That service prior to September 1941 of a station employee whose duties consisted of or included the carrying of passengers' hand baggage and otherwise assisting passengers at passenger stations shall be considered compensated service although the individual's remuneration was, in whole or in part, in the form of tips. (For the effect of compensation of less than $3.00 per month earned after December 31, 1936, for service to a local lodge or division of a railway-labor-organization employer, see part 222 of this chapter.)

(Sec. 3, 50 Stat. 310, as amended; 45 U.S.C. 228c)
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

DAY HIGH

 19,353

 21,286

 23,008

 23,714

 23,734

 23,093

 21,981

 22,822

 21,695

 20,897

 20,021

 20,870

 20,275

 18,996

 21,173

 19,644

 19,941

 18,791

 19,669

 18,838

 19,190

 20,262

 20,225

 20,551

 19,553

 19,247

 18,971

 22,072

 19,399

 21,242

 11,117

 11,159

 11,386

 11,075

 10,700

 10,400

 9,489

 9,547

 9,641

 9,684

 10,049

 10,610

 10,044

 10,193

 10,049

 9,593

 8,617

 8,515

 8,990

 9,129

 9,007

 10,060

 10,350

 10,409

 10,893

 10,816

 9,893

 11,084

 11,189

 10,318

 14,705

 15,407

 16,484

 16,509

 16,871

 16,112

 15,725

 16,106

 15,952

 15,717

 15,855

 15,822

 15,287

 14,423

 15,069

 14,272

 14,151

 13,124

 14,263

 14,397

 14,154

 15,739

 15,578

 15,588

 15,591

 15,427

 15,207

 16,522

 15,279

 15,719

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

SEPTEMBER 2018 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: October 4, 2018

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

PORT CHICAGO TOP IN SUISUN BAY
MPD

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA

No. DA 21-0530

STATE OF MONTANA,

Plaintiff and Appellee,

v.

DAVID ABRAHAM LORENZ,

Defendant and Appellant.

ORDER

Upon consideration of Appellee’s motion for a 30-day extension of time, and

good cause appearing therefor, 

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Appellee is granted an extension of time to 

and including August 28, 2023, within which to prepare, file, and serve its 

response brief.

Electronically signed by:

Mike McGrath

Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

July 14 2023

07/14/2023

Case Number: DA 21-0530
#### Robert Jones, Respondent, v. Delaware, Lackawanna and Western Railroad Company, Appellant.

Order affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements. All concurred, except Foote and Merrell, JJ., who dissented.
#### § 6.26 Indirect interest.

Industry member interest in retail licenses includes any interest acquired by corporate officials, partners, employees or other representatives of the industry member. Any interest in a retail license acquired by a separate corporation in which the industry member or its officials, hold ownership or are otherwise affiliated, is an interest in a retail license.
(No. 7094

#### Key Equipment and Supply Company, Claimant, *vs.*State of Illinois, Department of Transportation, Respondent.

*Opinion filed April 16, 1973.*

Key Equipment and Supply Company, Claimant, pro se.

William J. Scott, Attorney General; William E. Webber, Assistant Attorney General, for Respondent.

Per Curiam.
**Exhibit32.1**

 

CERTIFICATIONPURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

 

In connectionwith the Annual Report of Tennessee Commerce Bancorp, Inc. (the “Corporation”)on Form 10-K for the period ending December 31, 2005, as filed with theSecurities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, ArthurF. Helf, Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of the Corporation, certify,pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

(1)           TheReport fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities and Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2)           Theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operations of the Corporation.

 
|   | /s/ Arthur F. Helf                   |   |
|--------|--------------------------------------|--------|
|   | Arthur F. Helf                       |
|   | Chairman and Chief Executive Officer |
|   | Tennessee Commerce Bancorp, Inc.     |
|   | March 28, 2006                       |

 

----
#### In the Matter of the Claim of Walter B. Thomas, Respondent, against Fisher Body Corporation et al., Appellants. State Industrial Board, Respondent.

*807All concur.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY

 37,061

 38,053

 39,007

 39,947

 40,718

 41,486

 42,178

 42,888

 43,731

 44,751

 45,793

 46,707

 47,452

 48,086

 48,760

 49,239

 49,810

 50,376

 50,871

 51,382

 51,952

 52,749

 52,738

 52,628

 52,718

 52,832

 53,020

 53,158

 53,166

 53,216

 53,284

 34,428

 34,517

 34,586

 34,651

 34,730

 34,809

 34,983

 35,087

 35,212

 35,356

 35,470

 35,605

 35,725

 35,805

 36,001

 36,257

 36,548

 36,861

 37,169

 37,413

 37,712

 37,986

 39,349

 40,764

 42,147

 43,546

 44,912

 46,304

 47,676

 49,046

 50,401

STORAGE - A.F. 

 71,489

 72,570

 73,593

 74,598

 75,448

 76,295

 77,161

 77,975

 78,943

 80,107

 81,263

 82,312

 83,177

 83,891

 84,761

 85,496

 86,358

 87,237

 88,040

 88,795

 89,664

 90,735

 92,087

 93,392

 94,865

 96,378

 97,932

 99,462

 100,842

 102,262

 103,685

288

215

192

174

265

258

242

229

304

267

291

391

317

414

365

331

372

276

622

729

709

614

374

652

770

484

374

398

482

237

230

801

760

708

681

694

685

679

639

792

854

874

920

753

774

804

702

807

719

1,027

1,110

1,147

1,154

1,056

1,310

1,513

1,247

1,157

1,169

1,178

953

947

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

MAY 2015 FULL NATURAL FLOW AT NEW MELONES DAM RUN DATE: 07/08/2015

TOTALS +33,213 28,614

* October 1, 56,756

 203.0

 204.5

 205.9

 207.2

 208.6

 210.0

 211.3

 212.6

 214.2

 215.9

 217.6

 219.4

 220.9

 222.4

 224.0

 225.4

 227.0

 228.5

 230.5

 232.7

 235.0

 237.3

 239.4

 241.9

 245.0

 247.4

 249.7

 252.0

 254.4

 256.3

 258.1

DONNELLS

RES

BEARDSLEY

RES

2014 TO DATE

NEW

MELONES

INFLOW

C.F.S

NATURAL

RIVER

C.F.S

ACCUM *

FULL

NATURAL

1000 A.F.

RESERVOIR

TOTAL

+1,017

+1,081

+1,023

+1,005

+850

+847

+866

+814

+968

+1,164

+1,156

+1,049

+865

+714

+870

+735

+862

+879

+803

+755

+869

+1,071

+1,352

+1,305

+1,473

+1,513

+1,554

+1,530

+1,380

+1,420

+1,423

CHANGE

A.F. C.F.S.

+513

+545

+516

+507

+429

+427

+437

+410

+488

+587

+583

+529

+436

+360

+439

+371

+435

+443

+405

+381

+438

+540

+682

+658

+743

+763

+783

+771

+696

+716

+717