alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

DAY ELEV

 121.01

 121.09

 122.51

 121.70

 122.85

 122.84

 123.11

 121.09

 123.59

 123.36

 122.56

 122.13

 123.77

 124.44

 123.51

 123.10

 123.36

 123.91

 123.68

 123.67

 123.16

 122.72

 122.01

 122.10

 121.90

 122.09

 122.71

 124.09

 6,925

 6,959

 7,571

 7,215

 7,724

 7,719

 7,843

 6,959

 8,068

 7,960

 7,593

 7,400

 8,153

 8,481

 8,031

 7,838

 7,960

 8,219

 8,111

 8,106

 7,866

 7,665

 7,346

 7,386

 7,299

 7,382

 7,661

 8,306

STORAGE

+12

+34

+612

-356

+509

-5

+124

-884

+1,109

-108

-367

-193

+753

+328

-450

-193

+122

+259

-108

-5

-240

-201

-319

+40

-87

+83

+279

+645

CHANGE

6,582

7,328

7,841

11,973

15,414

21,320

30,517

33,066

68,515

81,092

80,930

75,916

58,071

38,621

31,855

31,529

31,608

32,244

31,833

31,929

31,393

31,306

31,262

31,661

31,854

31,854

32,313

27,718

INFLOW

 4,202

 3,478

 4,204

 4,202

 4,203

 4,201

 4,205

 4,181

 2,646

 631

 23

 36

 33

 27

 26

 25

 24

 28

 23

 24

 27

 27

 27

 29

 28

 29

 29

 29

POWER

 2,289

 3,748

 3,243

 7,865

 10,869

 17,037

 26,164

 29,246

 65,225

 80,430

 81,007

 75,892

 57,573

 38,344

 31,971

 31,516

 31,437

 32,000

 31,779

 31,823

 31,402

 31,294

 31,311

 31,527

 31,785

 31,698

 32,058

 27,279

SPILL

 85

 85

 85

 85

 85

 85

 85

 85

 85

 85

 85

 85

 85

 85

 85

 85

 85

 85

 85

 85

 85

 85

 85

 85

 85

 85

 85

 85

HATCHERY

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 1

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

C.F.S.

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

FEBRUARY 2017 LAKE NATOMA DAILY OPERATIONS RUN DATE: March 1, 2017

IN LAKE

EVAP

C.F.S.

COMPUTED*

ACRE-FEET

RELEASE - C.F.S.

TOTALS +1,393 977,545 36,647 937,812 2,380 1

ACRE-FEET +1,393 1,938,961 72,689 1,860,150 4,721 2

COMMENTS:

* COMPUTED INFLOW IS THE SUM OF CHANGE IN STORAGE, RELEASES AND EVAPORATION.

SUMMARY

RELEASES (ACRE-FEET)

POWER 72,689

SPILL 1,860,150

FOLSOM SOUTH CANAL

HATCHERY

 0

 4,721

 6,913

FOLSOM

SOUTH 

CANAL

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

(1)

(1) INCHES OF EVAPORATION TAKEN FROM FOLSOM PAN.

RELEASES (ACRE-FEET)

TOTAL 1,937,560
<PAGE>   1








                         Consent of BDO Seidman, LLP
                   Independent Certified Public Accountants

Health Management, Inc.

       We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Company's
Registration Statement on Form S-8 (Registration No. 33-90130) filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on March 8, 1995 of our reports dated July
22, 1996, except for Note 4(a) which is as of July 26, 1996, relating to the
consolidated financial statements and schedule of Health Management, Inc.
appearing in this Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended April 30, 1996.
Our reports contain an explanatory paragraph regarding the Company's ability to
continue as a going concern.

/s/ BDO Seidman, LLP
BDO Seidman, LLP

Mitchel Field, New York
July 29, 1996
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

DAY HIGH

 222

 221

 222

 222

 225

 229

 230

 234

 231

 232

 232

 236

 236

 236

 235

 230

 230

 236

 235

 240

 238

 234

 226

 227

 229

 231

 229

 230

 232

 236

 216

 217

 218

 218

 219

 219

 220

 221

 219

 220

 218

 224

 224

 224

 225

 225

 220

 220

 221

 223

 223

 219

 219

 212

 219

 219

 210

 223

 226

 224

 218

 218

 219

 219

 221

 222

 223

 225

 225

 226

 227

 229

 229

 228

 228

 227

 224

 225

 226

 228

 227

 224

 223

 223

 224

 224

 225

 227

 229

 230

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

APRIL 2007 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: May 2, 2007

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

HOLLAND TRACT ON OLD RIVER
§ 5.43 Relabeling activities that require separate written authorization from TTB. ( a ) *General.* Any permittee holding distilled spirits for sale who needs to relabel the containers but is not the original bottler may apply for written permission for the relabeling of distilled spirits containers. The appropriate TTB officer may permit relabeling of distilled spirits in containers if the facts show that the relabeling is for the purpose of compliance with the requirements of this part or State law, or for the purpose of replacing damaged labels.
( b ) *Application.* The written application must include: ( 1 ) Copies of the original and proposed new labels;
( 2 ) The circumstances of the request, including the reason for relabeling;
( 3 ) The number of containers to be relabeled;
( 4 ) The location where the relabeling will take place; and
( 5 ) The name and address of the person who will be conducting the relabeling operations.
(No. 74-CC-290

#### Bismarck Hotel Co., Claimant, *vs.*State of Illinois, Department of Corrections, Respondent.

*Opinion filed April 2, 1974.*

Bismarck Hotel Co., Claimant, pro se.

William J. Scott, Attorney General; Edward L. S. Arkema, Jr., Assistant Attorney General, for Respondent.

Per Curiam.
Exhibit 99.7




                       GE CAPITAL MORTGAGE SERVICES, INC.
             OFFICERS' ANNUAL COMPLIANCE CERTIFICATE - SERIES 1997-7


         The undersigned,  Vice Presidents of GE Capital Mortgage Services, Inc.
(the "Servicer"), pursuant to the Pooling and Servicing Agreement for the Series
1997-7 REMIC Multi-Class  Mortgage  Pass-Through  Certificates (the "Agreement")
entered into by GE Capital Mortgage Services,  Inc., as Seller and Servicer, and
State Street Bank and Trust Company,  as Trustee,  which  Agreement  requires an
annual  statement of  compliance  to be made to the Trustee by an officer of the
Servicer, hereby state that:

     (i)  a review  of the  activities  of the  Servicer  during  the  preceding
          calendar year and of its performance under the Agreement has been made
          under the undersigned officers' supervision; and

     (ii) to the  best of the  undersigned  officers'  knowledge,  based on such
          review,  the Servicer has  fulfilled  all of its material  obligations
          under  the  Agreement  throughout  such  year,  except as set forth on
          Exhibit A hereto.

Capitalized  terms used  herein but not  defined  herein  shall have the meaning
given to them in the Agreement.


Dated:            March 25, 1998




By:      /s/ Gregory A. Gibson
------------------------------
         Gregory A. Gibson
         Vice President


By:      /s/ Karen Pickett
--------------------------
         Karen Pickett
         Vice President



<PAGE>



                                    EXHIBIT A


         Flood Insurance.  There may be instances in which mortgage loans in the
CompanyOs   servicing  portfolio  which  did  not  require  flood  insurance  at
origination  were  subsequently  included  within  special flood hazard areas as
designated by the Federal  Emergency  Management  Agency and flood  insurance on
such mortgage loans may not yet be in place. The Company,  however, has arranged
for back-up flood insurance  coverage in the event of a flood loss relating to a
mortgaged  property  located in a special  flood  hazard  area.  The  Company is
continuing  a  remapping  effort  which  will  identify  mortgage  loans  in its
servicing  portfolio  which  may  now be (but  which  were  not at  origination)
included in special flood hazard  areas.  The Company is not aware of any losses
associated with the lack of flood insurance coverage on such mortgage loans.
#### § 771.73 General.

All motions shall be made and addressed to the administrative law judge before whom the proceeding is pending, and copies of all motion papers shall be served upon the other party or parties. The administrative law judge may dispose of any motion without oral argument, but he may, if he so desires, set it down for hearing and request argument. The administrative law judge may dispose of such motion prior to the hearing on the merits or he may postpone the disposition until the hearing on the merits. No appeal may be taken from any ruling on a motion until the whole record is certified for review. Examples of typical motions may be found in the Rules of Civil Procedure referred to in § 771.2.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

DAY ELEV

 223.47

 221.88

 221.00

 220.93

 220.71

 221.23

 221.17

 221.22

 221.36

 220.93

 219.70

 220.64

 220.36

 220.37

 220.52

 221.01

 220.66

 221.98

 220.66

 221.32

 220.28

 220.73

 221.44

 221.48

 220.84

 222.14

 222.47

 222.45

 223.25

 223.96

 52,303

 48,071

 45,760

 45,577

 45,001

 46,364

 46,206

 46,337

 46,705

 45,577

 42,376

 44,818

 44,088

 44,114

 44,505

 45,787

 44,870

 48,334

 44,870

 46,600

 43,879

 45,054

 46,915

 47,020

 45,341

 48,756

 49,634

 49,580

 51,714

 53,619

STORAGE

-698

-4,232

-2,311

-183

-576

+1,363

-158

+131

+368

-1,128

-3,201

+2,442

-730

+26

+391

+1,282

-917

+3,464

-3,464

+1,730

-2,721

+1,175

+1,861

+105

-1,679

+3,415

+878

-54

+2,134

+1,905

CHANGE

1,241

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

PUMPING

 1,983

 3,067

 2,244

 2,709

 3,712

 3,424

 2,840

 2,510

 2,525

 3,399

 3,667

 2,722

 3,987

 3,615

 2,993

 3,100

 3,797

 3,404

 4,895

 2,750

 4,145

 4,187

 3,203

 3,870

 4,028

 3,108

 4,491

 3,731

 3,684

 3,885

PUMPING

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

PUMPING

 274

 339

 330

 439

 364

 384

 423

 353

 224

 317

 597

 822

 949

 1,227

 835

 273

 287

 445

 775

 1,031

 722

 334

 463

 777

 926

 670

 449

 417

 483

 743

GEN.

*

+25

+63

+39

+3

-70

-119

+63

+64

-1

+42

-69

+25

-93

+64

-24

-33

-48

-61

-64

-72

-74

-63

-49

-80

-34

-116

-174

-82

-65

+219

OR

UNITED STATES 

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION

CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT

CONSOLIDATED STATE-FEDERAL O'NEILL FOREBAY May 30, 2013

DAILY OPERATIONS

APRIL 2013 RUN DATE:

IN LAKE GEN.

ACRE-FEET O'NEILL

RELEASE - C.F.S. 

TOTALS +618 1,241 16,672 0 101,675 -784

ACRE-FEET +618 2,462 33,069 0 201,672

SUMMARY

 672

RELEASE (ACRE-FEET)

O'NEILL GEN. 33,069

SAN LUIS PUMP 0 672

 53,001

DOS AMIGOS PUMP 201,672

DELIVERIES 

S. LUIS O'NEILL

 0

 0

 0

 2,135

 2,735

 3,660

 1,820

 1,820

 1,820

 1,820

 1,820

 3,185

 3,627

 3,620

 3,281

 3,547

 3,565

 5,360

 3,560

 3,560

 2,818

 3,557

 3,540

 3,533

 3,520

 5,207

 5,161

 3,760

 3,742

 3,728

 89,501

 177,525

CALIF. DOS AMIGOS

AQUEDUCT

639

1,209

1,369

918

1,120

954

1,301

1,045

1,115

1,284

899

1,565

1,034

1,171

767

506

105

296

428

1,165

750

1,619

1,114

1,248

621

408

395

443

1,567

1,980

 29,035

 57,591

S. LUIS

DELIV.

GAINS(+)

LOSS(-)

C.F.S.

INFLOW - C.F.S.

STATE OF CALIFORNIA

THE RESOURCES AGENCY

DEPARTMENT OF WATER RESOURCES

STATE WATER PROJECT

TOTAL 235,413

-1,555

* DAILY DEL. FIGURES UNAVAILABLE. TOT. DEL. IS INCLUDED IN COMPUTING MONTHLY TOTALS 

Table 18
EXHIBIT 32
 CCFNB BANCORP, INC.
 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. § 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
 
 1.
    
    this report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
 2.
    
    the information contained in this report fairly represents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.
  /s/ Lance O. DiehlLance O. DiehlChief Executive Officer  /s/ Jeffrey T. ArnoldJeffrey T. Arnold CPA, CIAChief Financial Officer
Exhibit 31.2

                                  CERTIFICATION

I, Thomas Viertel, Chief Financial Officer of Presidential Realty Corporation
(the "Company") certify that:

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of the Company;

2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any
   untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact
   necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances
   under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to
   the period covered by this quarterly report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
   information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all
   material respects the financial condition, results of operations and
   cash flows of the Company as of, and for, the periods presented in
   this quarterly report;

4. The Company's other certifying officers and I are responsible for
   establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as
   defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the
   Company and we have:

     a)    designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that
           material information relating to the Company, including its
           consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those
           entities, particularly during the period in which this quarterly
           report is being prepared;

     b)    evaluated the effectiveness of the Company's disclosure controls and
           procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the
           effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the
           end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation;
           and

     c)    disclosed in this report any changes in the Company's internal
           control over financial reporting that occurred during the Company's
           most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is
           reasonably likely to materially affect, the Company's internal
           control over financial reporting; and

5. The Company's other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our
   most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to
   the Company's auditors and the Audit Committee of the Company's Board of
   Directors:

     a)   all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
          operation of internal control over financial reporting which are
          reasonably likely to adversely affect the Company's ability to record,
          process, summarize and report financial information; and

     b)   any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
          employees who have a significant role in the Company's internal
          control over financial reporting.


  DATE:  May 16, 2005             By: /s/ Thomas Viertel
                                      --------------------------
                                      Thomas Viertel
                                      Chief Financial Officer
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 97-41472 Summary Calendar

STARLEN MCNAIRY, Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus MICHAEL WILSON, Senior Warden, Michael Unit; HOLLAND R. PICKLE, Captain, Michael Unit; ADONIA JEAN MCCALEY, Nurse, Michael Unit; JAMES A SNOW, Correctional Officer III, Michael Unit; LEVIE PRIM, Correctional Officer, Michael Unit, Defendants-Appellees.

- - - - - - - - - - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas USDC No. 6:97-CV-267

- - - - - - - - - - May 11, 1999 Before DAVIS, DUHE’, and PARKER, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: * Starlen McNairy, Texas prisoner # 517613, appeals the magistrate judge’s dismissal without prejudice of his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action for failing to exhaust administrative remedies. He argues that, although he had not exhausted his administrative remedies before filing suit, he exhausted such remedies while his suit was pending. McNairy’s notice of appeal was filed more thanNo. 97-41472 -2-

30 days after the final judgment and was thus untimely. See Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(1). However, the notice of appeal was timely filed following the denial of McNairy’s postjudgment motion, which the magistrate judge correctly construed as a Fed. R. Civ. P. 60(b) motion. See Harcon Barge Co. v. D & G Boat Rentals , 784 F.2d 665, 667 (5th Cir. 1986)(en banc). We review the denial of the Rule 60(b) motion for abuse of discretion. Carimi v. Royal Caribbean Line, Inc. , 959 F.2d 1344, 1345 (5th Cir. 1992). McNairy filed his suit after the effective date of the Prison Litigation Reform Act (PLRA) (April 26, 1996), and his case is thus governed by the provisions therein. See Underwood v. Wilson , 151 F.3d 292, 293 (5th Cir. 1998). The PLRA amended 42 U.S.C. § 1997e to require that a prisoner must exhaust his administrative remedies before filing a § 1983 action. See § 1997e(a). McNairy did not exhaust administrative remedies before filing suit, and his exhaustion of administrative remedies during the pendency of his suit does not satisfy the requirements of § 1997e(a). See Underwood , 151 F.3d at 296. The magistrate judge did not abuse her discretion in denying McNairy’s postjudgment motion challenging the magistrate judge’s dismissal of his suit for failing to exhaust administrative remedies.
AFFIRMED.
#### Morris Grossman, Respondent, v. Jacob Bluestein, Appellant, Impleaded with Others.

Judgment affirmed, with costs. No opinion. Present — Ingraham, P.'J., McLaughlin, Laughlin, Scott and Hotchkiss, JJ.; Ingraham, P. J., dissented.
§ 10.222 When may an employer terminate COP which has already begun? ( a ) Where the employer has continued the pay of the employee, it may be stopped only when at least one of the following circumstances is present: ( 1 ) Medical evidence which on its face supports disability due to a work-related injury is not received within 10 calendar days after the claim is submitted (unless the employer's own investigation shows disability to exist). Where the medical evidence is later provided, however, COP shall be reinstated retroactive to the date of termination;
( 2 ) The medical evidence from the treating physician shows that the employee is not disabled from his or her regular position;
( 3 ) Medical evidence from the treating physician shows that the employee is not totally disabled, and the employee refuses a written offer of a suitable alternative position which is approved by the attending physician. If OWCP later determines that the position was not suitable, OWCP will direct the employer to grant the employee COP retroactive to the termination date.
( 4 ) The employee returns to work with no loss of pay;
( 5 ) The employee's period of employment expires or employment is otherwise terminated (as established prior to the date of injury);
( 6 ) OWCP directs the employer to stop COP; and/or
( 7 ) COP has been paid for 45 calendar days.
( b ) An employer may not interrupt or stop COP to which the employee is otherwise entitled because of a disciplinary action, unless a preliminary notice was issued to the employee before the date of injury and the action becomes final or otherwise takes effect during the COP period.
( c ) An employer cannot otherwise stop COP unless it does so for one of the reasons found in this section or § 10.220. Where an employer stops COP, it must file a controversion with OWCP, setting forth the basis on which it terminated COP, no later than the effective date of the termination.
THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS

13-16-00480-CR

Ex Parte Jose Maria Reyes

On appeal from the

93rd District Court of Hidalgo County, Texas

Trial Cause No. CR-3980-06-B(1)

JUDGMENT

THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS, having considered this cause on 

appeal, concludes the appeal should be dismissed. The Court orders the appeal 

DISMISSED in accordance with its opinion.

We further order this decision certified below for observance.

December 1, 2016.
Exhibit 17.1
 DeSoto Jordan Jr.     E-Mail: desotodsjjr@aol.com
Motion Granted; Reversed and Remanded and Memorandum Opinion filed 

March 19, 2013.

In The

Fourteenth Court of Appeals

NO. 14-12-00945-CV

SONJIA JONES, Appellant

V.

DISCOVER BANK, Appellee

On Appeal from County Civil Court at Law No. 4

Harris County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 1012301

M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N

This is an appeal from a judgment signed July 10, 2012. On February 28, 

2013, the parties filed a joint motion to set aside the trial court’s judgment. See 

TEX. R. APP. P. 42.1(a)(2(B). The motion is granted.

Accordingly, the judgment is reversed and the cause remanded to the trial 

court for rendition of judgment in accordance with the parties’ agreement.

PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Chief Justice Hedges and Justices Boyce and Donovan.
|  |  | [if !vml]>[endif]>

You have  reached the Federal Depository Library Program Electronic Collection  (FDLP/EC) Archive. This archive assures ongoing access to publications in the  FDLP/EC. Access to publications in the archive is available through GPO's  suite of cataloging and locator services, including the Catalog of U.S.  Government Publications (CGP).
Title: National  compensation survey. Private industry. Anchorage, AK.
SuDocs Number: L 2.121/2:AN 2/
Item    Number: 0768-B-02    (online)
GPO    System Number: 000995750
 
 
 
2006
2007
2008
2009
 
 
A service of the Superintendent of Documents,  U.S. Government Printing Office..

 

Last updated:  October 12,  2000  Page Name:  http://permanent.access.gpo.gov/
perm |
|--|--|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|