alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY HIGH

 12,461

 8,549

 9,631

 8,687

 7,728

 8,149

 18,651

 20,573

 19,405

 20,738

 24,393

 24,425

 26,181

 27,853

 26,453

 26,507

 27,152

 28,160

 27,521

 29,408

 25,959

 24,297

 22,620

 22,005

 21,677

 22,941

 20,453

 21,199

 26,474

 24,723

 26,468

 3,992

 3,249

 3,120

 3,390

 3,112

 2,876

 2,033

 10,537

 9,877

 10,980

 12,264

 12,378

 12,773

 12,306

 10,057

 12,576

 10,589

 13,447

 13,959

 11,927

 8,638

 8,757

 9,843

 13,421

 13,245

 9,852

 11,332

 9,402

 8,663

 10,201

 13,672

 7,403

 6,027

 5,987

 5,718

 5,501

 5,384

 10,229

 15,571

 15,418

 15,819

 16,927

 16,467

 17,323

 18,266

 17,724

 18,590

 18,377

 19,703

 21,076

 20,829

 16,994

 18,980

 16,391

 17,434

 17,284

 17,401

 15,688

 15,087

 15,256

 18,738

 19,517

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

AUGUST 2009 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: September 2, 2009

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

PORT CHICAGO TOP IN SUISUN BAY
COURT OF APPEALS

EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

EL PASO, TEXAS

Linda S. Restrepo and Carlos E. Restrepo, 

d/b/a Collectively RDI Global Services and 

R & D International,

 Appellants,

v.

Alliance Riggers & Constructors, Ltd.,

 Appellee.

'

'

'

'

'

'

No. 08-13-00183-CV

Appeal from the

County Court at Law No 5

of El Paso County, Texas 

(TC# 2012DCV04523)

O R D E R

On August 30, 2013, the Court issued an order directing Appellants to file with the Court a 

reasonable explanation for failure to timely file the notice of appeal. Appellants have complied 

and assert that they mistakenly believed their request for findings of fact and conclusions of law 

extended the deadline for filing the notice of appeal pursuant to TEX.R.APP.P. 26.1. The Court 

finds that this is a reasonable explanation for the Appellants’ failure to file the notice of appeal by 

the due date. Accordingly, the Court finds that it has jurisdiction of the appeal.

IT IS SO ORDERED this 17th day of September, 2013.

PER CURIAM

Before McClure, C.J., Rivera and Rodriguez, JJ.

(Rivera, not participating)
#### In the Matter of Christie B. Garlasco, Judgment Creditor, Respondent, v. Harry Paltrowitz, Judgment Debtor, Appellant.

No opinion. Present — Mar-din, P. J., Townley, Untermyer, Cohn and Callahan, JJ.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 09-1115

RENATA MARCINKOWSKA,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

v.

IMG WORLDWIDE, INCORPORATED, an Ohio corporation; DEL CAMPO SAATCHI & SAATCHI, an Argentine company,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Rock Hill. Joseph F. Anderson, Jr., Chief District Judge. (0:07-cv-01214-JFA)

Submitted: March 25, 2009 Decided: April 15, 2009

Before NIEMEYER and MOTZ, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Renata Marcinkowska, Appellant Pro Se. William H. Brewster, KILPATRICK & STOCKTON, LLP, Atlanta, Georgia, John Witherspoon Foster, KILPATRICK & STOCKTON, LLP, Columbia, South Carolina; Hamlet Sam Mabry, III, HAYNSWORTH, SINKLER & BOYD, PA, Greenville, South Carolina, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM:

Renata Marcinkowska appeals the district court’s

dismissal, pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b)(2) and (6), of her

complaint alleging patent infringement in violation of 35 U.S.C.

§ 271 (2006), as well as other matters. Because Marcinkowska

incorrectly designated this court as the appellate court, when

the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit has

exclusive appellate jurisdiction of this patent infringement

matter, see 28 U.S.C. § 1295(a)(1) (2006); Christianson v. Colt

Indus. Operating Corp. , 486 U.S. 800, 807 (1988), we grant the

motions to dismiss for lack of jurisdiction filed by Defendants. *

DISMISSED

* Our finding that this appeal should have been pursued in the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit would ordinarily require this court to transfer the matter to that
court. See 28 U.S.C. § 1631 (2006). We find it not to be in the interest of justice to do so here, however, as our review of the Federal Circuit’s docket information reveals that Marcinkowska’s appeal was noted by that court on February 25, 2009.
1 

- - 

5. cUkll,rl.glxt, wlthrilr,fm 

hrtnlvarwrthr8t@8permmtk,ac 

tormuprlntedmtst(37pwmathSor 

tWh8rrmtiUJ ~b~~ttO0Xt-d $45 

pr x&h ..*..i.....................*.... 3,093.oa 3,w3.00 

8. ahlag lwo8 girl*, slxteon, 

WithbouaJ am fortnlm mrltbm, 

1oy to 8xcoed $34 * rnh............. 4,996.oo b,g!#.oo 

At&her ckrritul8tlc of tb iteu m&r tbr 8lnmapmq lutitutl$ JuJu~~tio a b fll io tbr r Lo mtl aaa unl p mLDiml for l ithu =b o udm 

. Ah íenmp luia l.k w 

,7Qr th tmw 

ìlîa & Y$ i3? 

3. wokbq8r,rltbboard,trrl~ 

. . . ..i.........*................*. plmo $no.oo 

ll. aoirrr eprxtor, filth m&u. . . . . . . boo.00 400.00 
_. 

bn~X.R.url&t,~3 
Wrtba ltuixedportlcmdea.llngtithtb,lkua~8choolf'ortbr 

D,thepurpamsforuhlch mpmAflcunmntrua ant.horimdurldanti~ 
. 

Bh (3-7-S)
**EXHIBIT 12(a)**

 

**FORM 10-Q**

**PACCAR FINANCIAL CORP.**

 

### **COMPUTATION OF RATIO OF EARNINGS TO FIXED CHARGES**

###  

**PURSUANT TO SEC REPORTINGREQUIREMENTS**(1)

### (Millions of Dollars)

###  

| ** **                          | ** ** | Three Months Ended | ** ** |
|-------------------------------------|------------|------------------------------|------------|
| ** **                          | ** ** | March 31                | ** ** |
| ** **                          | ** ** | **2009**                     | ** ** | 2008 | ** ** |
| ** **                          | ** ** | ** **                   | ** ** |   | ** ** |
| FIXED CHARGES                       |       |                         |       |   |   |
| Interest expense                    | ** ** | **$**                        | **34.2**   |   | $ | 44.8 |   |
| Portion of  rentals deemed interest | ** ** | **.4**                       |       | .4 |   |
|                                | ** ** | ** **                   |       |   |   |
| TOTAL FIXED  CHARGES                | ** ** | **$**                        | **34.6**   |   | $ | 45.2 |   |
|                                | ** ** | ** **                   |       |   |   |
| EARNINGS                            |       |                         |       |   |   |
| Income before  income taxes         | ** ** | **$**                        | **17.3**   |   | $ | 24.9 |   |
| Fixed charges                       | ** ** | **34.6**                     |       | 45.2 |   |
|                                | ** ** | ** **                   |       |   |   |
| EARNINGS AS  DEFINED                | ** ** | **$**                        | **51.9**   |   | $ | 70.1 |   |
|                                | ** ** | ** **                   |       |   |   |
| RATIO OF  EARNINGS TO FIXED CHARGES | ** ** | **1.50X**                    |       | 1.55X |   |

 

(1) Themethod of computing the ratio of earnings to fixed charges shown above complieswith SEC reporting requirements but differs from the method called for in theSupport Agreement between the Company and PACCAR as shown in Exhibit 12(b).

 

----
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY HIGH

 3,052

 2,524

 2,154

 2,205

 2,387

 2,670

 3,623

 4,274

 4,697

 4,774

 4,887

 5,128

 5,009

 4,338

 3,294

 2,663

 2,147

 2,261

 2,636

 3,083

 3,669

 3,921

 4,176

 4,016

 3,902

 3,917

 3,649

 3,517

 3,306

 3,126

 2,799

 1,155

 1,103

 1,041

 985

 996

 965

 975

 1,082

 1,157

 1,203

 1,211

 1,180

 1,196

 1,275

 1,190

 1,095

 1,054

 1,020

 1,011

 1,061

 1,183

 1,239

 1,300

 1,334

 1,290

 1,326

 1,351

 1,346

 1,295

 1,331

 1,301

 1,884

 1,659

 1,394

 1,313

 1,324

 1,367

 1,614

 1,947

 2,087

 2,160

 2,177

 2,304

 2,306

 2,096

 1,772

 1,552

 1,403

 1,336

 1,430

 1,635

 1,909

 2,002

 2,093

 2,061

 2,130

 2,091

 2,041

 1,991

 1,936

 1,919

 1,832

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

DECEMBER 2000 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: January 16, 2001

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

14 DAY

ACCUM

MEAN

14 DAY

AVG

MEAN

 24,932

 25,183

 25,208

 25,056

 24,737

 24,458

 24,405

 24,718

 25,006

 25,315

 25,597

 25,951

 25,669

 25,632

 25,520

 25,413

 25,422

 25,445

 25,551

 25,819

 26,114

 26,169

 26,175

 26,076

 26,029

 25,816

 25,551

 25,446

 25,610

 25,977

 26,406

 1,781

 1,799

 1,801

 1,790

 1,767

 1,747

 1,743

 1,766

 1,786

 1,808

 1,828

 1,854

 1,834

 1,831

 1,823

 1,815

 1,816

 1,818

 1,825

 1,844

 1,865

 1,869

 1,870

 1,863

 1,859

 1,844

 1,825

 1,818

 1,829

 1,856

 1,886

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

JERSEY POINT TOP ON THE SAN JOAQUIN RIVER
(No. 74-CC-369

#### Edward J. Morthole, Claimant, *vs.*State of Illinois, Department of Mental Health, Respondent.

*Opinion filed April 2, 1974.*

Edward J. Morthole, Claimant, pro se.

William J. Scott, Attorney General; Howard W. Feldman, Assistant Attorney General, for Respondent.

Per Curiam.
### §2222. Integrated consortium of laboratory networks

#### (a) In general

The Secretary of Homeland Security, in coordination with the Secretary of Health and Human Services, the Secretary of Agriculture, the Secretary of Commerce, and the Administrator of the Environmental Protection Agency, shall maintain an agreement through which relevant laboratory network members, as determined by the Secretary of Homeland Security, shall—

(1) agree on common laboratory methods in order to reduce the time required to detect and respond to foodborne illness outbreaks and facilitate the sharing of knowledge and information relating to animal health, agriculture, and human health;

(2) identify means by which laboratory network members could work cooperatively—

(A) to optimize national laboratory preparedness; and

(B) to provide surge capacity during emergencies; and

(3) engage in ongoing dialogue and build relationships that will support a more effective and integrated response during emergencies.

#### (b) Reporting requirement

The Secretary of Homeland Security shall, on a biennial basis, submit to the relevant committees of Congress, and make publicly available on the Internet Web site of the Department of Homeland Security, a report on the progress of the integrated consortium of laboratory networks, as established under subsection (a), in carrying out this section.

(Pub. L. 111–353, title II, §203, Jan. 4, 2011, 124 Stat. 3929.)
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY HIGH

 18,750

 17,825

 19,426

 20,052

 18,844

 19,091

 19,345

 18,306

 15,789

 17,192

 16,209

 20,047

 24,790

 25,671

 24,525

 24,885

 21,750

 23,830

 22,005

 23,371

 21,234

 20,043

 19,107

 19,176

 16,439

 16,244

 21,170

 18,062

 20,422

 19,332

 20,953

 5,623

 5,728

 6,037

 6,398

 6,453

 7,108

 7,609

 7,982

 7,713

 7,271

 7,785

 8,626

 9,309

 8,140

 8,152

 7,291

 9,312

 9,454

 9,429

 7,877

 8,028

 8,977

 7,726

 8,376

 7,428

 5,875

 7,529

 7,235

 7,500

 4,308

 4,794

 11,833

 11,994

 12,316

 12,675

 12,652

 12,985

 13,122

 12,964

 11,944

 11,601

 11,113

 12,629

 14,494

 14,696

 15,144

 13,713

 15,876

 15,922

 15,268

 14,493

 14,143

 14,388

 12,644

 13,623

 11,363

 10,187

 12,584

 11,991

 12,468

 11,017

 11,482

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

AUGUST 2005 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: September 12, 2005

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

PORT CHICAGO TOP IN SUISUN BAY
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
 Washington, D.C. 20549
 
 FORM 8-K
 CURRENT REPORT
Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
 Date of Report (Date of earliest event reported): June 30, 2011
 
 PHH CORPORATION
  MARYLAND
(State or other jurisdiction 
of incorporation)
    
    1-7797
(Commission File Number)
    
    52-0551284
(IRS Employer
Identification No.)
 3000 Leadenhall Road

Mt. Laurel, New Jersey 08054
 (856) 917-1744
  o
    
    Written communications pursuant to Rule 425 under the Securities Act (17 CFR 230.425)
 o
    
    Soliciting material pursuant to Rule 14a-12 under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.14a-12)
 o
    
    Pre-commencement communications pursuant to Rule 14d-2(b) under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.14d-2(b))
 o
    
    Pre-commencement communications pursuant to Rule 13e-4(c) under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.13e-4(c))




---



##### 



Item 5.02
    
    Departure of Directors or Certain Officers; Election of Directors;
Appointment of Certain Officers; Compensatory Arrangements of Certain Officers.
 Appointment of New Class II Director
   Item 5.03.
    
    Amendments to Articles of Incorporation or Bylaws; Change in Fiscal Year.
 Increase in Size of Board to Eight Directors




---



##### 



SIGNATURE
  PHH CORPORATIONBy:
    /s/  William F. BrownName:
    William F. BrownTitle:
    Senior Vice President,
General Counsel &
Secretary
November 5, 1996



VIA FACSIMILE AND U. S. MAIL

Ms. Illona Adams
c/o The Balcor Company
Bannockburn Lake Office Plaza
2355 Waukegan Road
Suite A-200
Bannockburn, IL 60015

Ms. Mary Lou Kennedy
First American Title Insurance 
Company
30 North LaSalle Street
Suite 310
Chicago, IL 60602

     Re:  Agreement of Sale by and between Southern Properties Fund, Inc., as
Purchaser, and Greenwald Partners Limited Partnership, as Seller, dated August
28, 1996 (the "Agreement")

Dear Mses. Adams and Kennedy:

     Pursuant to Section 8 of the Reinstatement of, and First Amendment to,
Agreement of Sale and Escrow Agreement, on behalf of our client, we are hereby
providing notice of our client's election to extend the Closing Date (as
defined in the Agreement) to a date on or before December 15, 1996.  Our client
will deliver the additional earnest money deposit in the amount of One Hundred
Thousand and 00/100 Dollars ($100,000.00) to the Escrow Agent (as defined in
the Agreement) on or before November 15, 1996.  Such additional earnest money
deposit is to be credited against the Purchase Price (as defined in the
Agreement) at closing.

                              Very truly yours,


                              /s/ Stephen J. Helfman
                              ----------------------------------
                              Stephen J. Helfman
SWZ:mas:347,001
cc:  Mr. Alan Lieberman
     Daniel J. Perlman, Esq.
     Ferdinand J. Gallo, III, Esq.
     Mr. Michael Wohl
     Mr. Ken Endelson
     Mr. Richard Finkelstein
     Stephen J. Helfman, Esq.
<PAGE>
```

[Congressional Bills 114th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 3823 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

114th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 3823

To provide for direct hire authority for positions in the Pipeline and 
   Hazardous Materials Safety Administration, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            October 23, 2015

  Mr. Gene Green of Texas (for himself, Mr. Olson, Ms. Hahn, and Mr. 
    Babin) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure, and in addition to the 
Committees on Energy and Commerce and Oversight and Government Reform, 
for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case 
for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of 
                        the committee concerned

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To provide for direct hire authority for positions in the Pipeline and 
   Hazardous Materials Safety Administration, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. DIRECT HIRE AUTHORITY FOR PIPELINE AND HAZARDOUS MATERIALS 
              SAFETY ADMINISTRATION.

    (a) Authority.--The Administrator of the Pipeline and Hazardous 
Materials Safety Administration may appoint qualified candidates to 
positions described in subsection (b) without regard to sections 3309 
through 3319 of title 5, United States Code.
    (b) Applicability.--The authority under subsection (a) applies with 
respect to candidates for any position that would likely allow 
increased activities relating to pipeline safety, as determined by the 
Administrator.
    (c) Employee Defined.--As used in this section, the term 
``employee'' has the meaning given such term in section 2105 of title 
5, United States Code.
    (d) Termination.--The authority to make appointments under this 
section shall not be available after December 31, 2017.

SEC. 2. REPORT.

    Not later than 180 days after the date of enactment of this Act, 
and annually thereafter through calendar year 2017, the Administrator 
of the Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration shall 
submit to Congress a report on efforts of the Administration to hire 
women, minorities, and veterans as inspectors since January 1, 2012.
                                 <all>
```
Exhibit 32.2

Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
As Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Maidenform Brands, Inc. (the "Company") for the year ended December 29,
2007, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Dorvin D. Lively, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| |  | By: | /s/DORVIN D. LIVELY
| |  | --- | -------------------
| |  |     | Name:              
| |  |     | Title:             

March 11,
2008

---
A-AA+Skip to content

                  - Home
                  - Compendium Statistics
                  - Event
                  - Archives
                  - Glossary
                  - Help
                  - Contact
                  - Research on Disability

Annual Disability Statistics Compendium

              - Home /
              - Archives /
              - 2012 Compendium Statistics /
              - 2012 Employment /
              - 2012 2.13 Full-Time, Year-Round Gap - Civilians Ages 18-64 Years Living in the Community for the U.S.

## Table 2.13: Employment: Full-Time, Year-Round (FTYR) Gap—Civilians Ages 18 to 64 Years Living in the Community for the United States and States, by Disability Status: 2011

----

----

 

----

#### 2012 Disability Compendium

                        - Home
                        - Compendium Statistics                           - Population and Prevelance
                          - Employment
                          - Time Trend Population Statistics
                          - Poverty
                          - Earnings
                          - Veterans
                          - Health Insurance Coverage
                          - Health
                          - Social Security Administration Programs
                          - Medicaid and Medicare
                          - Special Education
                          - Vocational Rehabilitation
                          - Federal Government Spending and Employment
                          - International Disability Statistics
                          - Population Statistics: Disability Type
                        - Event
                        - Archives                           - 2012 Compendium Statistics
                        - Glossary
                        - Help
                        - Contact
                        - Research on Disability

#### Funding for this project is made possible by:

 The Research and Training Center on Disability Statistics and Demographics (StatsRRTC), which is funded by the U.S. Department of Education, National Institute for Disability and Rehabilitation Research, under cooperative agreements H133B080012.

#### Stay Connected

**Institute on Disability**10 West Edge Drive, Suite 101Durham, NH 03824603.862.4320 | relay: 711 | [email protected]www.iod.unh.edu

© 2013. Institute on Disability.University of New Hampshire.
# Fourth Court of Appeals

**San Antonio, Texas**

JUDGMENT

No. 04

- 23

- 00109

- CV

NEC NETWORKS, LLC d/b/a CaptureRx, Appellant

v.

Brooke GILMARTIN , Independent Court Administrator of the Estate of J. Edward Charles Gilmartin, Deceased, Appellee

From the Probate Court No

. 1

, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2018PC3985

Honorable Oscar J. Kazen , Judge Presiding

BEFORE CHIEF JUSTICE MARTINEZ

, JUSTICE WATKINS , AND JUSTICE

VALENZUELA

In accordance with this court’s opinion of this date, we REVERS E the trial court’s denial of appellant NEC Networks, LLC d/b/a CaptureRx’s motion to dismiss appellee Brooke

Gilmartin’s counterclaim for intentional infliction of emotional distress under the Texas Citizens’ Participation Act. We RENDER judgment dismissi ng appellee’s intentional infliction

counterclaim. We REMAND this cause for a determination of CaptureRx’s court costs and reasonable attorney’s fees incurred in defending against Brooke Gilmartin’s intentional infliction

counterclaim. We AFFIRM the trial court’s denial of CaptureRx’s motion to dismiss Brooke Gilmartin’s request for sanctions.

SIGNED November 29, 2023.

_____________________________ Beth Watkins, Justice
# United States Court of Appeals For the First Circuit

No. 16-1549 BEST AUTO REPAIR SHOP, INC.; ELVIS MARTÍNEZ-EVANGELISTA, Plaintiffs, Appellants, MARÍA BETANCOURT-BORIA,
Plaintiff,

v.
UNIVERSAL INSURANCE GROUP; UNIVERSAL INSURANCE COMPANY; CARIBBEAN ALLIANCE INSURANCE COMPANY; EASTERN AMERICA INSURANCE AGENCY; JUANITA ORTIZ; JOHN DOE; JANE DOE, Defendants, Appellees.

**ERRATA SHEET** The opinion of this Court issued on November 16, 2017, is amended as follows: On page 2, footnote 1, line 1: "cases" is added after the word "consolidated," but before the comma.