+(,121/,1(

Citation: 47 Fed. Reg. 26379 1982 

Content downloaded/printed from 

HeinOnline (http://heinonline.org)

Thu May 20 16:06:28 2010

-- Your use of this HeinOnline PDF indicates your acceptance

 of HeinOnline's Terms and Conditions of the license

 agreement available at http://heinonline.org/HOL/License

-- The search text of this PDF is generated from 

 uncorrected OCR text.
Federal Register / Vol. 47, No. 118 / Friday, June 18, 1982 / Rules and Regulations

information submitted to support

approval of this application may be seen

in the Dockets Management Branch

(HFA-305), Food and Drug

Administration, Rm. 4-62, 5600 Fishers

Lane, Rockville, MD 20857, from 9 a.m.

to 4 p.m., Monday through Friday.

The Bureau of Veterinary Medicine

has determined pursuant to 21 CFR

25.24(d)(1)(i) (proposed December 11,

1979; 44 FR 71742) that this action is of a

type that does not individually or

cumulatively have a significant impact

on the human environment. Therefore,

neither an environmental assessment

nor an environmental impact statement

is required.

This action is governed by the

provisions of-5 U.S.C. 556 and 557 and is

therefore excluded from Executive

Order 12291 by section 1(a](1) of the

Order.

List of Subjects in 21 CFR Part 558

Animal drugs; Animal feeds.

PART 558-NEW ANIMAL DRUGS FOR

USE IN ANIMAL FEEDS

§ 558.274 [Amended]

Therefore, under the Federal Food,

Drug, and Cosmetic Act (sec. 512(i), 82

Stat. 347 (21 U.S.C. 360b(i])) and under

authority delegated to the Commissioner

of Food and Drugs (21 CFR 5.10) and

redelegated to the Bureau of Veterinary

Medicine (21 CFR 5.83), Part 558 is

amended in § 558.274 Hygromycin B

by adding, in numerical sequence, drug

sponsor code "050568" to paragraph

(a)(4) and to the "sponsor" column in

paragraph (e)(1](i) and (ii).

Effective date: June 18, 1982.

(Sec. 512(i), 82 Stat. 347 (21 U.S.C. 360b(i)))

Dated: June 11, 1982.

Gerald B. Guest,

Acting Director, Bureau of Veterinary

Medicine.

[FR Dce. 82-16330 Filed 6-17-82 8:45 am)

BILUNG CODE 4160-41-V

21 CFR Part 558

New Animal Drugs for Use In Animal

Feeds; Pyrantel Tartrate

AGENCY: Food and Drug Administration.

ACTION: Final rule.

SUMMARY: The Food and Drug

Administration (FDA) is amending the

animal drug regulations to reflect

approval of a new animal drug

application (NADA) filed for Custom

Feed Blenders Corp., providing for safe

and effective use of 9.6- and 19.2-gramper-pound pyrantel tartrate premixes for

making complete swine feeds.

EFFECTIVE DATE: June 18, 1982.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT.

Charles E. Haines, Bureau of Veterinary

Medicine (HFV-138), Food and Drug

Administration, 5600 Fishers Lane,

Rockville, MD 20857, 301-443-3410.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Custom

Feed Blenders Corp., 540 Hawkeye Ave.,

Fort Dodge, IA 50501, is the sponsor of

NADA 129-415 submitted on its behalf

by Pfizer, Inc. The NADA provides for

use of premixes containing 9.6 and 19.2

grams of pyrantel tartrate per pound for

making complete swine feeds used as an

aid in prevention of migration and

establishment of large roundworm

(Ascaris suum) infections, and aid in

prevention of establishment of nodular

worm (Oesophagostomum) infections,

and for removal and control of large

roundworm (Ascaris suum) infections.

Approval of this application relies on

safety and effectiveness data contained

in Pfizer's approved NADA 43-290. Use

of the data in NADA 43-290 to support

this application has been authorized by

Pfizer. This approval does not change

the approved use of the drug.

Consequently, approval of this NADA

poses no increased human risk from

exposure to residues of the animal drug,

nor does it change the conditions of the

drug's safe use in the target animal

species. Accordingly, under the Bureau

of Veterinary Medicine's supplemental

approval policy (42 FR 64367; December

23, 1977), the approval of this NADA has

been treated as would approval of a

Category II supplement and does not

require reevaluation of the safety and

effectiveness data in NADA 43-290.

In accordance with the freedom of

information provisions of Part 20 (21

CFR Part 20) and § 514.11(e)(2)(ii) (21

CFR 514.11(e](2)(ii)), a summary of

safety and effectiveness data and

information submitted to support

approval of this application may be seen'

in the Dockets Management Branch

(HFA-305), Food and Drug

Administration, Rm. 4-62, 5600 Fishers

Lane, Rockville, MD 20857, from 9 a.m.

to 4 p.m., Monday through Friday.

The Bureau of Veterinary Medicine

has determined pursuant to 21 CFR

25.24(d)(1)(i) (proposed December 11,

1979; 44 FR 71742) that this action is of a

type that does not individually or

cumulatively have a significant impact

on the human environment. Therefore,

neither an environmental assessment

nor an environmental impact statement

is required.

This action is governed by the

provisions of 5 U.S.C. 556 and 557 and is

therefore excluded from Executive

Order 12291 by section 1(a)(1) of the

Order.

List of Subjects in 21 CFR Part 558

Animal drugs; Animal feeds.

PART 558-NEW ANIMAL DRUGS FOR

USE IN ANIMAL FEEDS

Therefore, under the Federal Food,

Drug, and Cosmetic Act (Sec. 512(i), 82

Stat. 347 (21 U.S.C. 360b(i))) and under

authority delegated to the Commissioner

of Food and Drugs (21 CFR 5.10) and

redelegated to the Bureau of Veterinary

Medicine (21 CFR 5.83), Part 558 is

amended in § 558.485 by adding new

paragraph (a)(12) to read as follows:

§ 558.485 Pyrantel tartrate.

(a) * * *

(12) To 046987: 9.6 and 19.2 grams per

pound, paragraph (e)(1) and (2) of this

section.

* * * * *

Effective date: June 18, 1982.

(Sec. 512(i), 82 Stat. 347 (21 U.S.C. 360bWi)))

Dated. June 11, 1982.

Gerald B. Guest,

Acting Director, Bureau of Veterinary

Medicine.

[FR Doc. 82-18333 Filed 6-17-a2 8:46 amj

BILING CODE 4160-01-M

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION

AGENCY

40 CFR Part 52

[A-9-FRL 2142-1]

Approval and Promulgation of

Implementation Plans; California State

Implementation Plan Revision

AGENCY: Environmental Protection

Agency (EPA).

ACTION: Final rulemaking.

SUMMARY: Revisions to rules of the

Colusa County, Glenn County, Great

Basin Unified, Humboldt County, Lake

County, Mendocino County, Modoc

County, Placer County, Plumas County,

Shasta County, Sierra County, Siskiyou

County, and Yolo-Solano Air Pollution

Control Districts (APCDs) were

forwarded to EPA by the State of

California. These revisions generally are

administrative and concern permitting

procedure. EPA reviewed these rules

with respect to section 110 of the Clean

Air Act and determined that they should

be approved.

EFFECTIVE DATE: This action will be

effective on August 17, 1982, unless

notice is received within 30 days that

someone wishes to submit adverse or

critical comments.

26379

HeinOnline -- 47 Fed. Reg. 26379 1982
Federal Register / Vol. 47, No. 118 / Friday, June 18, 1982 1 Rules and Regulations

ADDRESSES: Copies of the revisions are

available for public inspection during

normal business hours at the following

locations:

Public Information Reference Unit,

Environmental Protection Agency, Library, 401 "M" Street, SW., Room 2404,

Washington, D.C. 20460.

Office of the Federal Register, 1100 "L"

Street, NW., Room 8401, Washington, D.C.

20408.

California Air Resources Board, 1102 "Q"

Street, Sacramento, CA 95812.

Colusa County Air Pollution Control District,

751 Fremont Street, Colusa CA 95932.

Glenn County Air Pollution Control District,

720 North Colusa Street, Willows, CA

95988.

Great Basin Unified Air Pollution Control

District, 873 North Main Street, Suite 213,

Bishop, CA 93514.

Humboldt County Air Pollution Control

District, 5600 S6uth Broadway, Eureka, CA

95501.

Lake County Air Pollution Control District,

255 North Forbes Street, Lakeport, CA

95453.

Mendocino County Air Pollution Control

District, Courthouse Square, Ukiah, CA

95482.

Modoc County Air Pollution Control District,

202 West Fourth Street, Alturas, CA 96101.

Placer County Health and Medical Services,

11491 B Avenue, Auburn, CA 95603.

Plumas County Air Pollution Control District,

Courthouse Annex, Quincy, CA 95971.

Shasta County Air Pollution Control District,

1855 Placer Street, Redding, CA 96001.

Sierra County Air Pollution Control District,

County Courthouse, Downieville, CA 95936.

Siskiyou County Air Pollution Control

District, 525 South Foothill Drive, Yreka,

CA 96097.

Yolo-Solano Air Pollution Control District,

323 First Street, Suite 5, Woodland, CA

95695.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Douglas Grano, Chief, State

Implementation Plan Section, Air

Management Division, Environmental

Protection Agency, 215 Fremont Street,

San Francisco, CA 94105, (415) 974-8058.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The

State of California submitted the

following rules and regulations on the

indicated dates:

Colusa County

February 25, 1980

Rule 2.7A-Standards for Granting

Applications

Rule 2.7B.-Conditional Approval

Glenn County

February 25, 1980

Section 51.1-Standards for Granting

Applications

Section 51.2-Conditional Approval

Great Basin Unified

December 17, 1979

Rule 203-Applications

Rule 209-A-Standards for Authorities to

Construct

Rule 209-B-Standards for Permits to

Operate

Rule 212-Additional Information (Deletion)

Rule 213-Implementation Plans

Humboldt County

March 23, 1981

Rule 130-Definitions

Rule 200-Permit Requirements

Rule 210-Environmental Assessment

Rule 220-New Source Review Standards

Rule 230-Action on Applications

Rule 240-Permit to Operate

Rule 250-Appeals

Rule 260-Exclusions

Lake County

March 1, 1982

Rule 655-Performance

Mendocino County

April 17, 1980

Rule 130-Definitions

Rule 200-Permit Requirements

Rule 21Q-Environmental Assessment

Rule 220-New Source Review Standards

Rule 230-Action on Applications

Rule 240-Permit to Operate

Rule 250-Appeals

Rule 260--Exclusions

Modoc County

December 17, 1979

Rule 2:8-e-Standards for Permits to

Construct

Placer County

August 21, 1979 (Lake Tahoe Air Basin

portion)

Rule 502-Permit Exceptions

Rule 503-Transfer

Rule 504-Applications

Rule 505-Cancellation of Authority to

Construct

Rule 506-Action on Applications

Rule 511-Revocation of a Permit

Rule 512-Appeals

Rule 513 -Reinstatement

October 15, 1979 (Mountain Counties Air

Basin portion)

Rule 501B-Permit to Operate

Rule 502-Exemptions

Rule 504-Applications

Rule 506-Action on Applications

Rule 512-Appeals

Rule 513-Reinstatement

Plumas County

June 22, 1981

Rule 501-Permit Required

Rule 502-Exemptions to Rule 501

Rule 503-Applications

Rule 504-Action on Applications

Rule 505-Conditional Appioval

Rule 506-Denial of Application

Rule 507-Responsibility

Rule 508--Posting of Permit to Operate

Rule 509-Authority to Inspect

Rule 510-Separation of Emissions

Rule 511-Combination of Emissions

Rule 517-Transfer

Rule 518-Revocation of a Permit to Operate

Rule 519-Appeals

Rule 520-Reinstatement

Rule 521-Annual Renewal

Shasta County

February 25, 1980

Rule 1:2.-Definitions

Rule 2:1A.-Permits Required

Sierra County

June 22, 1981

Rule 501-Permit Required

Rule 502-Exemptions to Rule 501

Rule 503 -Applications

Rule 504-Action on Applications

Rule 505-Conditional Approval

Rule 506-Denial of Application

Rule 507 -Responsibility

Rule 508-Posting of Permit to Operate

Rule 509-Authority to Inspect

Rule 510-Separation of Emissions

Rule 511-Combination of Emissions

Rule 517-Transfer

Rule 518-Revocation of a Permit to Operate

Rule 519-Appeals

Rule 520-Reinstatement

Rule 521-Annual Renewal

Siskiyou County

October 15, 1979

Rule 2.14-Standards for Permit to Construct

Rule C.15 -Standards for Permit to Operate

Rule 2.16-State Ambient Air Quality

Standards

Yolo-Solano

February 25, 1980

Rtile 3.4.1-Standards for Granting

Applications

Rule 3.4.2-Conditional Approval

Rule 3.13-Public Review and Comment for

Application for Authority to Construct

Under section 110 of the Clean Air Act

as amended, and 40 CFR Part 51, the

Administrator is required to approve or

disapprove these regulations as State

Implementation Plan (SIP) revisions. All

the rules listed above have been

evaluated and found in accordance with

EPA policy and 40 CFR Part 51. Detailed

evaluation reports are available for

public inspection at the EPA Library in,

Washington, D.C. and the EPA Region 9

Office.

This notice approves all the rules

revisions listed above and incorporates

them into the California SIP, EPA's

approval of the above revisions to the

California SIP is being done without

prior proposal because the revisions are

not controversial. The public is advised

that this approval action will be

effective August 17, 1982. However, if

notice is received by EPA within 30 days

that someone wishes to submit adverse

or critical comments, the approval

action will be withdrawn and a

subsequent notice will be published

before the effective date. The

subsequent notice will indefinitely

postpone the effective date, modify the

final action to a proposed action, and

establish a comment period.

The Office of Management and Budget

has exempted this rule from the

requirements of section 3 of Executive

Order 12291.

26380

HeinOnline -- 47 Fed. Reg. 26380 1982
Federal Register I Vol. 47, No. 118 / Friday, June 18, 1982 / Rules and Regulations

Under 5 U.S.C. 605(b), the

Administrator has certified that SIP

approvals do not have a significant

economic impact on a substantial

number of small entities. (See 46 FR

8709.)

Under the Clean Air Act, any petitions

for judicial review of this action must be

filed in the United States Court of

Appeals for the appropriate circuit by

August 17, 1982. This action may not be

challenged later in proceedings to

enforce its requirements.

Incorporation by reference of the

State Implementation Plan for the State

of Californa was approved by the

Director of the Federal Register on July

1, 1981.

List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52

Air pollution control, Ozone, Sulfur

oxides, Nitrogen dioxide, Lead,

Particulate matter, Carbon monoxide,

Hydrocarbons.

(Secs. 110, and 301(a), Clean Air Act, as

amended (42 U.S.C. 7410 and 7601(a)))

Dated: June 14,1982.

Ann M. Gorsuch,

Administrator.

PART 52-APPROVAL AND

PROMULGATION OF

IMPLEMENTATION PLANS

Subpart F of Part 52 of Chapter 1, Title

40 of the Code of Federal Regulations is

amended as follows:

Subpart F-California

1. Section 52.220 is amended by

adding paragraphs (c)(52) (xiii)(D) and

(xxi), (54)(iv)(C), (x), (xi), and (xii),

(58)(iii)(B) and (ix), (80)(i)(C), (93)(iii),

and (iv), (95)(vi), (119)(ii), and (121)(iii)

to read as follows:

§ 52.220 Identification of plan.

(c) * * *

(52) * * *

(xiii) * * *

(D) New or amended Rules 5011, 502,

504, 506, 512, and 513. * * * * *€

(xxi) Siskiyou County APCD.

(A) New or amended Rules 2.14-2.16, * * * * *

(54) * * *

(iv) * * *

(C) New or amended Rules 3.13, 3.4.1,

and 3.4.2. * * * * *

(x) Colusa County APCD.

(A) New or amended Rules 2.7 A and

B.

(xi) Glenn County APCD.

(A) New or amended Rules 51.1 and

51.2.

(xii) Shasta County APCD.

(A) New or amended Rules 1:2 (Best

Available Control Technology,

Stationary Source and Precursor) and

2:1 A.

(58) * * *

(iii) * * *

(B) New or amended Rules 203, 209-A

and B, 212, and 213. * * * * *

(ix) Modoc County APCD.

(A) New or amended Rule 2:8-e.

(80) * * *

i) * * *

(C) New or amended Rules 502-506

and 511-513. * * * * *

(93) * * *

(iii) Plumas County APCD.

(B) New or amended Rules 501-511

and 517-521.

(iv) * * *

(B) New or amended Rules 501-511

and 517-521.

(95) * * *

(vi) Humboldt County APCD.

(A) New or amended Rules 130, 200,

210, 220, 230, 240, 250, and 260. • * * * *

(119) * * *

(ii) Mendocino County APCD.

(A) New or amended Rules 130, 200,

210, 220, 230, 240, 250, and 260. * * * * *

(121) * * *

(iii) Lake County APCD.

(A) New or amended Rule 655.

lFR Doc. 82-10492 Filed 6-17-82 8:45 amJ

BILUNG CODE 6560-50-M

40 CFR Part 52

[A-3-FRL 2137-7]

Approval of Revision of the Maryland

State Implementation Plan

AGENCY: Environmental Protection

Agency.

ACTION: Final rule.

SUMMARY: The purpose of this notice is

to approve a revision to the Maryland

State Implementation Plan (SIP) which -

was submitted on August 11, 1981. The

public hearing on these changes, which

include new iron and steel industry

regulations, was held on July 15, 1981.

This revision consists of new iron and

steel regulations. This notice also

approves complementary changes to the

definitions, the general emission

regulations, and .technical memoranda

relating to test procedures. In addition,

the notice approves a new technical

memorandum specifying the procedures

for observing and evaluating visible

emissions and a new Amended Plan for

Compliance (PFC) for the Bethlehem

Steel Corporation's Sparrows Point,

Maryland plant. These amendments

satisfy a condition of approval of the

Part D plan for attainment of the

primary total suspended particulate

standard.

EFFECTIVE DATE: July 19, 1982.

ADDRESSES: Copies of this SIP revision

and the accompanying support

documents are available for inspection

during normal business hours at the

following offices:

U.S. Environmental Protection Agency,

Region III, Air Programs Branch,

Curtis Building, Tenth Floor, Sixth &

Walnut Streets, Philadelphia,

Pennsylvania 19106, ATTN: Patricia

Sheridan

Maryland Department of Health &

Mental Hygiene, Air Management

Administration, 201 W. Preston Street,

Baltimore, Maryland 21201, ATTN:

George P. Ferreri

Public Information Reference Unit,

Room 2922, EPA Library, U.S.

Environmental Protection Agency, 401

M Street, SW., Washington, D.C.

20460

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT.

Mr. Harold A. Frankford (3AW12), U.S.

Environmental Protection Agency,

Region III, Sixth & Walnut Streets,

Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19106,

telephone: 215/597-8392.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Background

On August 11, 1981, the Governor of

the State of Maryland submitted

amended regulations as a revision to the

Maryland State Implementation Plan.

This revision, identified by Maryland as

Revision 81-03, includes State-initiated

changes as well as new Code of

Maryland Air Regulations (COMAR

10.18.10) and a new Amended Plan for

Compliance (PFC) for the Bethlehem

Steel Corporation, Sparrows Point Plant.

The State adopted these regulations to

satisfy a condition of approval of the

Part D plan (46 FR 45341, Sept. 11, 1981).

A public hearing on the PFC and the

amended regulations was held on July

15, 1981 in Baltimore, Maryland. The

regulations were adopted on August 11,

1981 and became effective State

regulations on October 10, 1981. These

amendments and the PFC have been

developed and submitted in accordance

26381

HeinOnline -- 47 Fed. Reg. 26381 1982
Federal Register] Vol. 47, No. 118 / Friday, June 18, 1982 / Rules and Regulations

with the requirements of Title 40, Code

of Federal Regulations, Part 51.

Description of Revision/Solicitation of

Public Comments

The February 2, 1982 notice of

proposed rulemaking, 47 FR 4704,

describes the major elements of the

State's SIP revision as well as the

chronology of events leading up to the

State's August 11, 1981 submittal.

This notice also solicited public

comments on EPA's proposed

rulemaking action. However, during the

comment period provided by this notice

and a February 9, 1982 correction notice,

47 FR 5912, no comments were received.

EPA Evaluation

EPA has reviewed the revision

submitted by Maryland and finds that it

satisfies the condition of the approval of

the Part D SIP. During the review of the

revision, EPA identified four items

which required clarification by the State

of Maryland. The State responded to

these items in a letter dated October 28,

1981. These issues are discussed below:

1. EPA requested that the State of

Maryland clarify whether the intent

underlying COMAR 10.18.10.03 is that

the no visible emission standard applies

to argon-oxygen decarbonization

vessels.

Maryland responded that it is the

intent of the State of Maryland that

COMAR 10.18.10.03A(1), which requires

no-visible emissions other than water in

an uncombined form, applies to the two

buildings in Area III of the State which

contain argon-oxygen decarbonization

vessels.

2. EPA, in its review, questioned if the "reasonable control methods" required

in COMAR 10.18.10.04B(2) (a), 1b), (e),

and (h) were in place and being

employed and, if so, were the standards

in COMAR 10.18.10.03B (1), (2), (4), and

(5) effective and enforceable

immediately.

Maryland responded that the

Bethlehem Steel Corporation, Sparrows

Point Plant is presently in compliance

with COMAR 10.18.10.04B(2) (a), (b), (e)

and (h). The "reasonable control

methods" required by these regulations

are in place, and the visible emission

requirements of COMAR 10.18.10.03B

(1), (2), (4), and (5) were in effect as of

October 10, 1981 the regulation's

effective date.

3. EPA noted that the PFC delays

enforceability of the mass emission

standard for coke oven combustion

stacks due to problems with the current

test method. The Agency requested that

Maryland assure EPA in writing that

alternate testing procedures developed

for the particulate sampling method be

submitted as a SIP revision no later than

December 31, 1982.

Maryland pointed out that the PFC

calls for an alternative test procedure

for the particulate sampling method at

the coke oven combustion stacks to be

finalized by December 31, 1982. The

State of Maryland anticipates no

problem at the present time complying

with this requirement and intends to

submit the final test procedures to EPA

as a SIP revision as soon as the

procedure is finalized. This Is expected

to be prior to December 31, 1982.

4. EPA's review revealed that the PFC

allows the development of an alternate

visible emission standard for the Basic

Oxygen Furnaces (BOF) when

reasonable controls are in place. It also

Indicates that the installation may occur

in two stages. The Agency has informed

the State that an interim visible

emission standard must be developed

for the first stage.

Maryland stated that the PFC

provides that the Department could

require additional controls at the BOF

Shop, beyond those presently required

in the PFC, to be utilized by December

31, 1982. Should this occur, the State of

Maryland commits to develop an interim

visible emission standard for the BOF

Shop and to submit it to EPA as a SIP

revision no later than December 31,

1983.

EPA Actions

Based upon the above evaluations, the

Administrator approves the new iron

and steel regulation (COMAR 10.18.10),

the new Technical Memorandum AMATM 81-04, the new Method 13 to be

added to AMA-TM 73-116, the amended

COMAR 10.18.01 and COMAR 10.18.06,

and the Amended Plan for Compliance

(considering the above necessary

changes) for the Bethlehem Steel.

Corporation's Sparrows Point, Maryland plant. Accordingly, this notice amends

40 CFR 52.1070 (Identification of Plan) of

Subpart V (Maryland) to incorporate the

documents submitted by Maryland as

part of Revision 81-03 into the Maryland

SIP. This notice also removes 40 CFR

52.1075 (Conditional Approvals) as the

State of Maryland has now satisfied all

of the conditions under which EPA had

approved Maryland's 1979 Part D SIP.

The Office of Management and Budget

has exempted this rule from the

requirements of Section 3 of Executive

Order 12291.

Under 5 U.S.C. 605(b), I have certified

that SIP approvals do not have a

significant economic impact on a

substantial number of small entities.

(See 46 FR 8709.)

Under section 307(b)(1) of the Act,

petitions for judicial review of this

action must be filed in the United States

Court of Appeals for the appropriate

circuit by August 17, 1982.

This action may not be challenged later

in proceedings to enforce its

requirements. (See 307(b)(2))

List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52

Air pollution control, Ozone, Sulfur

oxides, Nitrogen dioxide, Lead,

Particulate matter, Carbon monoxide,

Hydrocarbons.

Dated: June 14, 1982.

Anne M. Gorsuch,

Administrator.

Note.-Incorporation by reference of the

State Implementation Plan for the State of

Maryland was approved by the Director of

the Federal Register on July 1, 1981.

PART 52-APPROVAL AND

PROMULGATION OF

IMPLEMENTATION PLANS

Title 40, Part 52, Subpart V, of the

Code of Federal Regulations is amended

as follows:

Subpart V-Maryland

1. In § 52.1070, paragraph (c)(67) is

added to read as follows:

§ 52.1070 Identification of plan.

(c)* * *

(67) Code of Maryland Air Regulations

(COMAR) 10.18.10 (Control of Iron and

Steel Production Installations);

Technical Memorandum AMA-TM 81-

04: Amendment to AMA-TM 73-116;

Amendments to COMAR 10.18.01.01

(General Administrative RegulationsDefinitions) and COMAR 10.18.06.02

(General Emission Standards,

Prohibitions and Restriction); and a New

Amended Plan for Compliance for the

Bethlehem Steel Corporation's Sparrows

Point, Maryland Plant; submitted on

August 11, 1981 by the Governor.

§ 52.1075 (Removed and reserved]

2. Section 52.1075 is removed and

reserved.

1FR Dec. 82-16544 Filed 6-17-82; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE S560-0-M

40 CFR Part 52

[A-9-FRL 2139-7]]

Approval and Promulgation of

Implementation Plans; Arizona State

Implementation Plan Revision

AGENCY: Environmental Protection

Agency.

ACTION: Notice of final rulemaking.

26382

HeinOnline -- 47 Fed. Reg. 26382 1982