20846 Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 72 / Thursday, April 14, 2011 / Rules and Regulations 

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION 

AGENCY 

40 CFR Part 52 

[EPA–R05–OAR–2010–0998; FRL–9295–3] 

Approval and Promulgation of Air 

Quality Implementation Plans; Indiana 

AGENCY: Environmental Protection 

Agency (EPA). 

ACTION: Direct final rule. 

SUMMARY: EPA is approving a request 

submitted by the Indiana Department of 

Environmental Management on 

November 24, 2010, to revise the 

Indiana State Implementation Plan (SIP) 

under the Clean Air Act (CAA). These 

revisions address sulfur dioxide (SO2) 

and particulate matter (PM) limits for 

Cargill, Incorporated (Cargill) at its 

facility in Hammond (Lake County), 

Indiana. Indiana’s SO2 revisions tighten 

emission limits for some existing units 

at Cargill’s Hammond facility and 

remove the references to other emission 

units that are no longer in operation, in 

accordance with the terms of a 

September 2005 Federal consent decree. 

The PM revisions reflect the permanent 

shutdown of, and changes in unit 

identification for other Cargill units. 

DATES: This direct final rule will be 

effective June 13, 2011, unless EPA 

receives adverse comments by May 16, 

2011. If adverse comments are received, 

EPA will publish a timely withdrawal of 

the direct final rule in the Federal 

Register informing the public that the 

rule will not take effect. 

ADDRESSES: Submit your comments, 

identified by Docket ID No. EPA–R05– 

OAR–2010–0998, by one of the 

following methods: 

1. http://www.regulations.gov: Follow 

the on-line instructions for submitting 

comments. 

2. E-mail: aburano.douglas@epa.gov. 

3. Fax: (312) 408–2279. 

4. Mail: Douglas Aburano, Chief, 

Control Strategies Section, Air Programs 

Branch (AR–18J), U.S. Environmental 

Protection Agency, 77 West Jackson 

Boulevard, Chicago, Illinois 60604. 

5. Hand Delivery: Douglas Aburano, 

Chief, Control Strategies Section, Air 

Programs Branch (AR–18J), U.S. 

Environmental Protection Agency, 77 

West Jackson Boulevard, Chicago, 

Illinois 60604. Such deliveries are only 

accepted during the Regional Office 

normal hours of operation, and special 

arrangements should be made for 

deliveries of boxed information. The 

Regional Office official hours of 

business are Monday through Friday, 

8:30 a.m. to 4:30 p.m., excluding 

Federal holidays. 

Instructions: Direct your comments to 

Docket ID No. EPA–R05–OAR–2010– 

0998. EPA’s policy is that all comments 

received will be included in the public 

docket without change and may be 

made available online at http:// 

www.regulations.gov, including any 

personal information provided, unless 

the comment includes information 

claimed to be Confidential Business 

Information (CBI) or other information 

whose disclosure is restricted by statute. 

Do not submit information that you 

consider to be CBI or otherwise 

protected through http:// 

www.regulations.gov or e-mail. The 

http://www.regulations.gov Web site is 

an ‘‘anonymous access’’ system, which 

means EPA will not know your identity 

or contact information unless you 

provide it in the body of your comment. 

If you send an e-mail comment directly 

to EPA without going through http:// 

www.regulations.gov your e-mail 

address will be automatically captured 

and included as part of the comment 

that is placed in the public docket and 

made available on the Internet. If you 

submit an electronic comment, EPA 

recommends that you include your 

name and other contact information in 

the body of your comment and with any 

disk or CD–ROM you submit. If EPA 

cannot read your comment due to 

technical difficulties and cannot contact 

you for clarification, EPA may not be 

able to consider your comment. 

Electronic files should avoid the use of 

special characters, any form of 

encryption, and be free of any defects or 

viruses. 

Docket: All documents in the docket 

are listed in the http:// 

www.regulations.gov index. Although 

listed in the index, some information is 

not publicly available, e.g., CBI or other 

information whose disclosure is 

restricted by statute. Certain other 

material, such as copyrighted material, 

will be publicly available only in hard 

copy. Publicly available docket 

materials are available either 

electronically in http:// 

www.regulations.gov or in hard copy at 

the Environmental Protection Agency, 

Region 5, Air and Radiation Division, 77 

West Jackson Boulevard, Chicago, 

Illinois 60604. This facility is open from 

8:30 a.m. to 4:30 p.m., Monday through 

Friday, excluding Federal holidays. We 

recommend that you telephone Matt 

Rau, Environmental Engineer, at (312) 

886–6524 before visiting the Region 5 

office. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Matt 

Rau, Environmental Engineer, Control 

Strategies Section, Air Programs Branch 

(AR–18J), Environmental Protection 

Agency, Region 5, 77 West Jackson 

Boulevard, Chicago, Illinois 60604, 

(312) 886–6524, rau.matthew@epa.gov. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Throughout this document whenever 

‘‘we,’’ ‘‘us,’’ or ‘‘our’’ is used, we mean 

EPA. This supplementary information 

section is arranged as follows: 

I. What is the background for this action? 

II. What is EPA’s analysis of the revision? 

III. What are the environmental effects of this 

action? 

IV. What action is EPA taking? 

V. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews 

I. What is the background for this 

action? 

a. Sulfur Dioxide Emissions 

Cargill entered into a Federal consent 

decree with EPA and a number of states, 

including Indiana, to resolve a 

complaint filed against the company in 

the United States District Court for the 

District of Minnesota. The consent 

decree was lodged on September 1, 

2005. It covers 24 Cargill facilities in 13 

states. 

Paragraph 15 of the consent decree 

requires, among other things, that 

Cargill submit permit applications to 

applicable permitting authorities that 

will contain annual SO2 emission limits 

for the facilities and boilers listed in 

Appendix B of the decree. Appendix B 

lists four boilers at the Hammond 

facility—Numbers 6, 7, 8, and 10. It 

requires the retirement of Boiler 

Number 7, while removing the emission 

limits, recordkeeping requirements, and 

reporting requirements for the other 

three boilers. All four boilers have been 

permanently shutdown. 

Paragraph 27 of the consent decree 

requires SO2 emission reductions at the 

Hammond facility to be achieved 

through the installation of pollution 

control technologies and the 

implementation of emission reduction 

projects to meet a level of control 

specified for the sources in Appendix L 

of the decree. 

Indiana has revised SIP rule 326 

Indiana Administrative Code (IAC) 7– 

4.1–5 to address these consent decree 

provisions. 

b. Particulate Matter 

Indiana revised Cargill’s emission 

limits in 326 IAC 6.8–2–8 to remove the 

emission units that are no longer in 

operation at the Hammond facility. 

These revisions were not required by 

the consent decree, but were made to 

reflect the permanent shutdown of 

Cargill units—ten process sources and 

two natural gas-fired boilers. Those 

units now have no emission limits and, 

as such, they cannot be operated. In 

mstockstill on DSKH9S0YB1PROD with RULES

Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 72 / Thursday, April 14, 2011 / Rules and Regulations 20847 

addition, Indiana has made changes in 

unit identification to reflect current 

operations. 

II. What is EPA’s analysis of the 

revision? 

The revisions to the SO2 emission 

limits in 326 IAC 7–4.1–5 should result 

in improved air quality. There will no 

longer be emissions from the four 

boilers that Cargill has permanently 

shutdown, as referenced in Appendix B 

of the consent decree. In addition, there 

should be substantial SO2 emission 

reductions resulting from the eight units 

required to be controlled in Appendix L 

of the consent decree. The revisions to 

the PM emission rule, 326 IAC 6.8–2– 

8, help to clarify the PM requirements 

for Cargill. 

EPA, therefore, finds these revisions 

to the SO2 and PM SIP rules acceptable. 

III. What are the environmental effects 

of this action? 

As a result of the SO2 emission 

reduction requirements in the consent 

decree, Cargill shutdown eight units and 

tightened emission limits on four other 

units. The total allowable SO2 emissions 

rate from all Cargill units is now 622 

pounds per hour lower. The revisions 

have the potential to reduce SO2

emissions by 2730 tons per year. 

Sulfur dioxide in the atmosphere can 

aggravate respiratory and cardiovascular 

disease. Sulfur dioxide emissions also 

contribute to acid rain and fine 

particulate matter formation. 

Indiana also removed the PM 

emission limits for ten units that are 

permanently shutdown. The emission 

limit revisions do not cause a reduction 

in PM emissions as the units have 

already ceased operation, but they are 

indicative of the reduction in total 

allowable PM emissions that has 

occurred at the Cargill facility. The 

facility’s cumulative allowable PM 

emissions are now 71 pounds per hour 

lower. That yields a potential annual 

reduction of 311 tons of PM emissions. 

Particulate matter interferes with lung 

function when inhaled. Exposure to 

particulates can cause heart and lung 

disease. Particulate matter also 

aggravates asthma. Airborne particulate 

matter or PM is the main source of haze 

that causes a reduction in visibility. 

IV. What action is EPA taking? 

EPA is approving revisions to the 

Indiana SIP. This consists of revisions of 

the PM emission rule, 326 IAC 6.8–2– 

8, and the SO2 emission rule, 326 IAC 

7–4.1–5. 

We are publishing this action without 

prior proposal because we view this as 

a noncontroversial amendment and 

anticipate no adverse comments. 

However, in the proposed rules section 

of this Federal Register publication, we 

are publishing a separate document that 

will serve as the proposal to approve the 

state plan if relevant adverse written 

comments are filed. This rule will be 

effective June 13, 2011 without further 

notice unless we receive relevant 

adverse written comments by May 16, 

2011. If we receive such comments, we 

will withdraw this action before the 

effective date by publishing a 

subsequent document that will 

withdraw the final action. All public 

comments received will then be 

addressed in a subsequent final rule 

based on the proposed action. The EPA 

will not institute a second comment 

period. Any parties interested in 

commenting on this action should do so 

at this time. Please note that if EPA 

receives adverse comment on an 

amendment, paragraph, or section of 

this rule and if that provision may be 

severed from the remainder of the rule, 

EPA may adopt as final those provisions 

of the rule that are not the subject of an 

adverse comment. If we do not receive 

any comments, this action will be 

effective June 13, 2011. 

V. Statutory and Executive Order 

Reviews 

Under the CAA, the Administrator is 

required to approve a SIP submission 

that complies with the provisions of the 

CAA and applicable Federal regulations. 

42 U.S.C. 7410(k); 40 CFR 52.02(a). 

Thus, in reviewing SIP submissions, 

EPA’s role is to approve state choices, 

provided that they meet the criteria of 

the CAA. Accordingly, this action 

merely approves state law as meeting 

Federal requirements and does not 

impose additional requirements beyond 

those imposed by state law. For that 

reason, this action: 

• Is not a ‘‘significant regulatory 

action’’ subject to review by the Office 

of Management and Budget under 

Executive Order 12866 (58 FR 51735, 

October 4, 1993); 

• Does not impose an information 

collection burden under the provisions 

of the Paperwork Reduction Act 

(44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.); 

• Is certified as not having a 

significant economic impact on a 

substantial number of small entities 

under the Regulatory Flexibility Act 

(5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.); 

• Does not contain any unfunded 

mandate or significantly or uniquely 

affect small governments, as described 

in the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act 

of 1995 (Pub. L. 104–4); 

• Does not have Federalism 

implications as specified in Executive 

Order 13132 (64 FR 43255, August 10, 

1999); 

• Is not an economically significant 

regulatory action based on health or 

safety risks subject to Executive Order 

13045 (62 FR 19885, April 23, 1997); 

• Is not a significant regulatory action 

subject to Executive Order 13211 (66 FR 

28355, May 22, 2001); 

• Is not subject to requirements of 

Section 12(d) of the National 

Technology Transfer and Advancement 

Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C. 272 note) because 

application of those requirements would 

be inconsistent with the CAA; and 

• Does not provide EPA with the 

discretionary authority to address, as 

appropriate, disproportionate human 

health or environmental effects, using 

practicable and legally permissible 

methods, under Executive Order 12898 

(59 FR 7629, February 16, 1994). 

In addition, this rule does not have 

tribal implications as specified by 

Executive Order 13175 (65 FR 67249, 

November 9, 2000), because the SIP is 

not approved to apply in Indian country 

located in the state, and EPA notes that 

it will not impose substantial direct 

costs on tribal governments or preempt 

tribal law. 

The Congressional Review Act, 5 

U.S.C. 801 et seq., as added by the Small 

Business Regulatory Enforcement 

Fairness Act of 1996, generally provides 

that before a rule may take effect, the 

agency promulgating the rule must 

submit a rule report, which includes a 

copy of the rule, to each House of the 

Congress and to the Comptroller General 

of the United States. EPA will submit a 

report containing this action and other 

required information to the U.S. Senate, 

the U.S. House of Representatives, and 

the Comptroller General of the United 

States prior to publication of the rule in 

the Federal Register. A major rule 

cannot take effect until 60 days after it 

is published in the Federal Register. 

This action is not a ‘‘major rule’’ as 

defined by 5 U.S.C. 804(2). 

Under section 307(b)(1) of the CAA, 

petitions for judicial review of this 

action must be filed in the United States 

Court of Appeals for the appropriate 

circuit by June 13, 2011. Filing a 

petition for reconsideration by the 

Administrator of this final rule does not 

affect the finality of this action for the 

purposes of judicial review nor does it 

extend the time within which a petition 

for judicial review may be filed, and 

shall not postpone the effectiveness of 

such rule or action. Parties with 

objections to this direct final rule are 

encouraged to file a comment in 

response to the parallel notice of 

proposed rulemaking for this action 

published in the proposed rules section 

mstockstill on DSKH9S0YB1PROD with RULES

20848 Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 72 / Thursday, April 14, 2011 / Rules and Regulations 

of today’s Federal Register, rather than 

file an immediate petition for judicial 

review of this direct final rule, so that 

EPA can withdraw this direct final rule 

and address the comment in the 

proposed rulemaking. This action may 

not be challenged later in proceedings to 

enforce its requirements. (See section 

307(b)(2).) 

List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52 

Environmental protection, Air 

pollution control, Incorporation by 

reference, Intergovernmental relations, 

Particulate matter, Reporting and 

recordkeeping requirements, Sulfur 

oxides. 

Dated: April 4, 2011. 

Susan Hedman, 

Regional Administrator, Region 5. 

40 CFR part 52 is amended as follows: 

PART 52—[AMENDED] 

■ 1. The authority citation for part 52 

continues to read as follows: 

Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq. 

Subpart P—Indiana 

■ 2. In § 52.770 the table in paragraph 

(c) is amended by revising the entries 

for ‘‘Article 6.8. Particulate Matter 

Limitations For Lake County’’ and 

‘‘Article 7. Sulfur Dioxide Rules’’ to read 

as follows: 

§ 52.770 Identification of plan. 

* * * * * 

(c) * * * 

EPA-APPROVED INDIANA REGULATIONS

Indiana citation Subject Indiana 

effective date EPA approval date Notes 

*******

Article 6.8. Particulate Matter Limitations for Lake County 

Rule 1. General Provisions 

6.8–1–1 ............. Applicability ......................................................................... 2/22/2008 4/30/2008, 73 FR 23356. 

6.8–1–1.5 .......... Definitions ........................................................................... 9/9/2005 3/22/2006, 71 FR 14383. 

6.8–1–2 ............. Particulate emission limitations; fuel combustion steam 

generators, asphalt concrete plant, grain elevators, 

foundries, mineral aggregate operations; modification 

by commissioner.

9/9/2005 3/22/2006, 71 FR 14383. 

6.8–1–3 ............. Compliance determination .................................................. 9/9/2005 3/22/2006, 71 FR 14383. 

6.8–1–4 ............. Compliance schedules ........................................................ 9/9/2005 3/22/2006, 71 FR 14383. 

6.8–1–5 ............. Control strategies ................................................................ 2/22/2008 4/30/2008, 73 FR 23356. 

6.8–1–6 ............. State implementation plan revisions ................................... 9/9/2005 3/22/2006, 71 FR 14383. 

6.8–1–7 ............. Scope .................................................................................. 2/22/2008 4/30/2008, 73 FR 23356. 

Rule 2. Lake County: PM10 Emission Requirements 

6.8–2–1 ............. General provisions and definitions ..................................... 2/22/2008 4/30/2008, 73 FR 23356. 

6.8–2–2 ............. Lake County: PM10 and total suspended particulates 

(TSP) emissions.

2/22/2008 4/30/2008, 73 FR 23356. 

6.8–2–4 ............. ASF-Keystone, Inc.—Hammond ......................................... 2/22/2008 4/30/2008, 73 FR 23356. 

6.8–2–6 ............. BP Products North America, Inc.—Whiting Refinery ......... 2/22/2008 4/30/2008, 73 FR 23356. 

6.8–2–7 ............. Bucko Construction Company, Inc ..................................... 2/22/2008 4/30/2008, 73 FR 23356. 

6.8–2–8 ............. Cargill, Inc ........................................................................... 11/19/2010 4/14/2011, [Insert page number where the document 

begins]. 

6.8–2–9 ............. W.R. Grace and Co.—Conn ............................................... 2/22/2008 4/30/2008, 73 FR 23356. 

6.8–2–13 ........... Hammond Group, Inc. (HGI) Halox Division, Lead Products Division, and Hammond Expander Division.2/22/2008 4/30/2008, 73 FR 23356. 

6.8–2–14 ........... Hammond Group, Inc.—Halstab Division ........................... 2/22/2008 4/30/2008, 73 FR 23356. 

6.8–2–16 ........... Resco Products, Inc ........................................................... 2/22/2008 4/30/2008, 73 FR 23356. 

6.8–2–17 ........... Mittal Steel—Indiana Harbor East Inc ................................ 2/22/2008 4/30/2008, 73 FR 23356. 

6.8–2–18 ........... Jupiter Aluminum Corporation ............................................ 2/22/2008 4/30/2008, 73 FR 23356. 

6.8–2–19 ........... Dover Chemical Corporation—Hammond .......................... 2/22/2008 4/30/2008, 73 FR 23356. 

6.8–2–20 ........... LaSalle Steel Company ...................................................... 2/22/2008 4/30/2008, 73 FR 23356.

6.8–2–21 ........... Mittal Steel—Indiana Harbor West Inc ............................... 2/22/2008 4/30/2008, 73 FR 23356. 

6.8–2–22 ........... Carmeuse Lime Inc ............................................................ 2/22/2008 4/30/2008, 73 FR 23356. 

6.8–2–24 ........... Methodist Hospital Inc ........................................................ 2/22/2008 4/30/2008, 73 FR 23356. 

6.8–2–25 ........... National Recovery Systems ............................................... 2/22/2008 4/30/2008, 73 FR 23356. 

6.8–2–26 ........... NIPSCo—Dean H. Mitchell Station .................................... 2/22/2008 4/30/2008, 73 FR 23356. 

6.8–2–27 ........... Praxair Inc ........................................................................... 2/22/2008 4/30/2008, 73 FR 23356. 

6.8–2–28 ........... Premiere Candy Company ................................................. 2/22/2008 4/30/2008, 73 FR 23356. 

6.8–2–29 ........... Reed Minerals—Plant #14 .................................................. 2/22/2008 4/30/2008, 73 FR 23356. 

6.8–2–30 ........... Rhodia, Inc .......................................................................... 2/22/2008 4/30/2008, 73 FR 23356. 

6.8–2–31 ........... Silgan Containers Manufacturing Corporation ................... 2/22/2008 4/30/2008, 73 FR 23356. 

6.8–2–32 ........... Smith Ready Mix, Inc ......................................................... 2/22/2008 4/30/2008, 73 FR 23356. 

6.8–2–33 ........... State Line Energy, LLC ...................................................... 2/22/2008 4/30/2008, 73 FR 23356. 

6.8–2–34 ........... Huhtamaki Foodservice, Inc ............................................... 2/22/2008 4/30/2008, 73 FR 23356. 

6.8–2–35 ........... Conopco, Inc. d/b/a Unilever HPC USA ............................. 2/22/2008 4/30/2008, 73 FR 23356. 

6.8–2–36 ........... Union Tank Car Company, Plant 1 .................................... 2/22/2008 4/30/2008, 73 FR 23356. 

6.8–2–37 ........... United States Gypsum Company ....................................... 2/22/2008 4/30/2008, 73 FR 23356. 

mstockstill on DSKH9S0YB1PROD with RULES

Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 72 / Thursday, April 14, 2011 / Rules and Regulations 20849 

EPA-APPROVED INDIANA REGULATIONS—Continued 

Indiana citation Subject Indiana 

effective date EPA approval date Notes 

6.8–2–38 ........... U.S. Steel—Gary Works ..................................................... 2/22/2008 4/30/2008, 73 FR 23356. 

Rule 4. Lake County: Opacity Limits; Test Methods 

6.8–4–1 ............. Test methods ...................................................................... 2/22/2008 4/30/2008, 73 FR 23356. 

Rule 8. Lake County: Continuous Compliance Plan 

6.8–8–1 ............. Applicability ......................................................................... 2/22/2008 4/30/2008, 73 FR 23356. 

6.8–8–2 ............. Documentation; operation and maintenance procedures .. 9/9/2005 3/22/2006, 71 FR 14383. 

6.8–8–3 ............. Plan requirements ............................................................... 9/9/2005 3/22/2006, 71 FR 14383. 

6.8–8–4 ............. Plan; schedule for complying with 326 IAC 6.8–7 ............. 9/9/2005 3/22/2006, 71 FR 14383. 

6.8–8–5 ............. Plan; source categories ...................................................... 9/9/2005 3/22/2006, 71 FR 14383. 

6.8–8–6 ............. Plan; particulate matter control equipment; operation and 

maintenance.

9/9/2005 3/22/2006, 71 FR 14383. 

6.8–8–7 ............. Plan; particulate matter control equipment; recording; operation; inspection.9/9/2005 3/22/2006, 71 FR 14383. 

6.8–8–8 ............. Plan; department review ..................................................... 9/9/2005 3/22/2006, 71 FR 14383. 

Rule 9. Lake County: PM10 Coke Battery Emission Requirements 

6.8–9–1 ............. Applicability ......................................................................... 9/9/2005 3/22/2006, 71 FR 14383. 

6.8–9–2 ............. Definitions ........................................................................... 9/9/2005 3/22/2006, 71 FR 14383. 

6.8–9–3 ............. Emission limitations ............................................................ 2/22/2008 4/30/2008, 73 FR 23356. 

Rule 10. Lake County: Fugitive Particulate Matter 

6.8–10–1 ........... Applicability ......................................................................... 2/22/2008 4/30/2008, 73 FR 23356. 

6.8–10–2 ........... Definitions ........................................................................... 9/9/2005 3/22/2006, 71 FR 14383. 

6.8–10–3 ........... Particulate matter emission limitations ............................... 9/9/2005 3/22/2006, 71 FR 14383. 

6.8–10–4 ........... Compliance requirements; control plans ............................ 9/9/2005 3/22/2006, 71 FR 14383. 

Rule 11. Lake County: Particulate Matter Contingency Measures 

6.8–11–1 ........... Applicability ......................................................................... 9/9/2005 3/22/2006, 71 FR 14383. 

6.8–11–2 ........... ‘‘Ambient monitoring data’’ defined ..................................... 9/9/2005 3/22/2006, 71 FR 14383. 

6.8–11–3 ........... Exceedances ...................................................................... 9/9/2005 3/22/2006, 71 FR 14383. 

6.8–11–4 ........... Violation of 24-hour standard ............................................. 9/9/2005 3/22/2006, 71 FR 14383. 

6.8–11–5 ........... Violation of annual standard ............................................... 9/9/2005 3/22/2006, 71 FR 14383. 

6.8–11–6 ........... Reduction measures ........................................................... 9/9/2005 3/22/2006, 71 FR 14383. 

Article 7. Sulfur Dioxide Rules 

Rule 1.1. Sulfur Dioxide Emission Limitations 

7–1.1–1 ............. Applicability ......................................................................... 6/24/2005 9/26/2005, 70 FR 56129. 

7–1.1–2 ............. Sulfur dioxide emission limitations ..................................... 6/24/2005 9/26/2005, 70 FR 56129. 

Rule 2. Compliance 

7–2–1 ................ Reporting requirements; methods to determine compliance.6/24/2005 9/26/2005, 70 FR 56129. 

Rule 3. Ambient Monitoring 

7–3–2 ................ Ambient monitoring ............................................................. ........................ 5/13/1982, 47 FR 20583. 

Rule 4. Emission Limitations and Requirements by County 

7–4–2 ................ Marion County sulfur dioxide emission limitations ............. 3/11/1999 8/2/2000, 65 FR 47336. 

7–4–3 ................ Vigo County sulfur dioxide emission limitations ................. 9/30/2004 2/28/2005, 70 FR 9533. 

7–4–4 ................ Wayne County sulfur dioxide emission limitations ............. 4/10/1988 9/1/1988, 53 FR 33808. 

7–4–5 ................ LaPorte County sulfur dioxide emission limitations ............ 4/10/1988 9/1/1988, 53 FR 33808. 

7–4–6 ................ Jefferson County sulfur dioxide emission limitations ......... 4/10/1988 9/1/1988, 53 FR 33808. 

7–4–7 ................ Sullivan County sulfur dioxide emission limitations ............ 4/10/1988 9/1/1988, 53 FR 33808. 

7–4–8 ................ Vermillion County sulfur dioxide emission limitations ........ 4/10/1988 1/19/1989, 54 FR 2112. 

7–4–9 ................ Floyd County sulfur dioxide emission limitations ............... 4/10/1988 9/1/1988, 53 FR 33808. 

7–4–10 .............. Warrick County sulfur dioxide emission limitations ............ 8/30/2008 11/10/2009, 74 FR 57904. 

7–4–11 .............. Morgan County sulfur dioxide emission limitations ............ 5/13/1988 12/16/1988, 53 FR 50521. 

7–4–12.1 ........... Gibson County sulfur dioxide emission limitations ............. 12/5/1990 9/19/1994, 59 FR 47804. 

7–4–13 .............. Dearborn County sulfur dioxide emission limitations ......... 3/16/2005 2/28/2006, 71 FR 9936. 

7–4–14 .............. Porter County sulfur dioxide emission limitations .............. 10/23/1988 1/19/1989, 54 FR 2112. 

mstockstill on DSKH9S0YB1PROD with RULES

20850 Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 72 / Thursday, April 14, 2011 / Rules and Regulations 

EPA-APPROVED INDIANA REGULATIONS—Continued 

Indiana citation Subject Indiana 

effective date EPA approval date Notes 

Rule 4.1. Lake County Sulfur Dioxide Emission Limitations 

7–4.1–1 ............. Lake County sulfur dioxide emission limitations ................ 6/24/2005 9/26/2005, 70 FR 56129. 

7–4.1–2 ............. Sampling and analysis protocol .......................................... 6/24/2005 9/26/2005, 70 FR 56129. 

7–4.1–3 ............. BP Products North America Inc. sulfur dioxide emission 

limitations.

6/24/2005 9/26/2005, 70 FR 56129. 

7–4.1–4 ............. Bucko Construction sulfur dioxide emission limitations ..... 6/24/2005 9/26/2005, 70 FR 56129. 

7–4.1–5 ............. Cargill, Inc. sulfur dioxide emission limitations ................... 11/19/2010 4/14/2011, [Insert page number where the document 

begins]. 

7–4.1–6 ............. Carmeuse Lime sulfur dioxide emission limitations ........... 6/24/2005 9/26/2005, 70 FR 56129. 

7–4.1–7 ............. Cokenergy Inc. sulfur dioxide emission limitations ............ 6/24/2005 9/26/2005, 70 FR 56129. 

7–4.1–8 ............. Indiana Harbor Coke Company sulfur dioxide emission 

limitations.

6/24/2005 9/26/2005, 70 FR 56129. 

7–4.1–9 ............. Ironside Energy, LLC sulfur dioxide emission limitations ... 6/24/2005 9/26/2005, 70 FR 56129. 

7–4.1–10 ........... ISG Indiana Harbor Inc. sulfur dioxide emission limitations 6/24/2005 9/26/2005, 70 FR 56129. 

7–4.1–11 ........... Ispat Inland Inc. sulfur dioxide emission limitations ........... 6/24/2005 9/26/2005, 70 FR 56129. 

7–4.1–12 ........... Methodist Hospital sulfur dioxide emission limitations ....... 6/24/2005 9/26/2005, 70 FR 56129. 

7–4.1–13 ........... National Recovery Systems sulfur dioxide emission limitations.6/24/2005 9/26/2005, 70 FR 56129. 

7–4.1–14 ........... NIPSCO Dean H. Mitchell Generating Station sulfur dioxide emission limitations.6/24/2005 9/26/2005, 70 FR 56129. 

7–4.1–15 ........... Rhodia sulfur dioxide emission limitations ......................... 6/24/2005 9/26/2005, 70 FR 56129. 

7–4.1–16 ........... Safety-Kleen Oil Recovery Company sulfur dioxide emission limitations.6/24/2005 9/26/2005, 70 FR 56129. 

7–4.1–17 ........... SCA Tissue North America LLC sulfur dioxide emission 

limitations.

6/24/2005 9/26/2005, 70 FR 56129. 

7–4.1–18 ........... State Line Energy, LLC sulfur dioxide emission limitations 6/24/2005 9/26/2005, 70 FR 56129. 

7–4.1–19 ........... Unilever HPC USA sulfur dioxide emission limitations ...... 6/24/2005 9/26/2005, 70 FR 56129. 

7–4.1–20 ........... U.S. Steel—Gary Works sulfur dioxide emission limitations.6/24/2005 9/26/2005, 70 FR 56129. 

7–4.1–21 ........... Walsh and Kelly sulfur dioxide emission limitations ........... 6/24/2005 9/26/2005, 70 FR 56129. 

* * * * * * * 

* * * * * 

[FR Doc. 2011–8867 Filed 4–13–11; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 6560–50–P 

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION 

AGENCY 

40 CFR Part 52 

[EPA–R05–OAR–2010–0545; FRL–9295–1] 

Approval and Promulgation of Air 

Quality Implementation Plans; Indiana; 

Stage I Vapor Recovery Rule 

AGENCY: Environmental Protection 

Agency (EPA). 

ACTION: Direct final rule. 

SUMMARY: EPA is approving into the 

Indiana State Implementation Plan 

(SIP), amendments to the stage I vapor 

recovery rule and administrative 

changes to stage II vapor recovery rule 

submitted by the Indiana Department of 

Environmental Management on June 11, 

2010. These rule revisions made volatile 

organic compounds (VOC) emission 

control requirements for filling at 

gasoline dispensing facilities more 

stringent by applying them statewide, 

making the rule applicable to smaller 

tanks and revising the requirements for 

newer submerged fill pipes. These new 

State requirements update the SIP 

consistent with new Federal 

requirements from January 10, 2008 area 

source National Emissions Standards for 

Hazardous Air Pollutants (NESHAPs) 

for gasoline dispensing facilities. The 

revisions also delete references to 

compliance dates which have passed. 

The rules are approvable because they 

are consistent with the Clean Air Act 

(Act) and EPA regulations, and should 

result in additional emission reductions 

of VOCs throughout Indiana. 

DATES: This direct final rule will be 

effective June 13, 2011, unless EPA 

receives adverse comments by May 16, 

2011. If adverse comments are received, 

EPA will publish a timely withdrawal of 

the direct final rule in the Federal 

Register informing the public that the 

rule will not take effect. 

ADDRESSES: Submit your comments, 

identified by Docket ID No. EPA–R05– 

OAR–2010–0545, by one of the 

following methods: 

1. http://www.regulations.gov: Follow 

the on-line instructions for submitting 

comments. 

2. E-mail: aburano.douglas@epa.gov. 

3. Fax: (312) 408–2279. 

4. Mail: Doug Aburano, Chief, Control 

Strategies Section, Air Programs Branch 

(AR–18J), U.S. Environmental 

Protection Agency, 77 West Jackson 

Boulevard, Chicago, Illinois 60604. 

5. Hand Delivery: Doug Aburano, 

Chief, Control Strategies Section, Air 

Programs Branch (AR–18J), U.S. 

Environmental Protection Agency, 77 

West Jackson Boulevard, Chicago, 

Illinois 60604. Such deliveries are only 

accepted during the Regional Office 

normal hours of operation, and special 

arrangements should be made for 

deliveries of boxed information. The 

Regional Office official hours of 

business are Monday through Friday, 

8:30 a.m. to 4:30 p.m., excluding 

Federal holidays. 

Instructions: Direct your comments to 

Docket ID No. EPA–R05–OAR–2010– 

0545. EPA’s policy is that all comments 

received will be included in the public 

docket without change and may be 

made available online at http:// 

www.regulations.gov, including any 

mstockstill on DSKH9S0YB1PROD with RULES