alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
RESPONDED ON NOVEMBER 30, 2009 4:53 PM 

### Greg Principato, President, Airports Council International-North America

I firmly believe thatthe FederalAdvisory Committee announcedby DOT Secretary LaHood can make a difference iftheyhave a clear mission andbroad aviation representation. Why am I so confident? Because I served as Executive Director on the Commission to Ensure a Strong Competitive Airline Industry (National Airline) Commission in 1993. While most ofour recommendations were not implemented, they were certainlyforward looking
- including our emphasis on modernization ofthe air traffic control system. In orderto chart a successful future way forward for the aviation industry, I believe the following five issues mustbe addressed:
• The critical need for investment in airport infrastructure and air traffic modernization; • The development ofa sustainable funding system for aviation, given the fact that receipts for the Airport &Airways Trust Fund continue to decline and the ever increasing airline fees do not contribute to theTrust Fund; • Consumer issues including ensuring airline competition, the continuation of small community air service and more disclosure ofconsumerinformation to passengersbefore they purchase their tickets; • The full range ofaviation environmental issues including climate change, noise, water quality andbiofuels; and; • Ensuring international competitiveness through additional open skies agreements, as well as a level playing field for U.S. manufacturers ofaircraft and systems.Greg Principato, President Airports Council International-NorthAmerica
NASA LogoNTRSNTRS - NASA Technical Reports ServerSearchmore_vertCollectionsAboutNewsHelpLogin Back to ResultsAeroelastic Analyses of the SemiSpan SuperSonic Transport (S4T) Wind Tunnel Model at Mach 0.95Detailed aeroelastic analyses of the SemiSpan SuperSonic Transport (S4T) wind tunnel model at Mach 0.95 with a 1.75deg fixed angle of attack are presented. First, a numerical procedure using the Computational Fluids Laboratory 3-Dimensional (CFL3D) Version 6.4 flow solver is investigated. The mesh update method for structured multi-block grids was successfully applied to the Navier-Stokes simulations. Second, the steady aerodynamic analyses with a rigid structure of the S4T wind tunnel model are reviewed in transonic flow. Third, the static analyses were performed for both the Euler and Navier-Stokes equations. Both the Euler and Navier-Stokes equations predicted a significant increase of lift forces, compared to the results from the rigid structure of the S4T wind-tunnel model, over various dynamic pressures. Finally, dynamic aeroelastic analyses were performed to investigate the flutter condition of the S4T wind tunnel model at the transonic Mach number. The condition of flutter was observed at a dynamic pressure of approximately 75.0-psf for the Navier-Stokes simulations. However, it was observed that the flutter condition occurred a dynamic pressure of approximately 47.27-psf for the Euler simulations. Also, the computational efficiency of the aeroelastic analyses for the S4T wind tunnel model has been assessed.Document ID20140010017Acquisition SourceLangley Research CenterDocument TypeContractor Report (CR)AuthorsHur, Jiyoung*(Analytical Mechanics Associates, Inc. Hampton, VA, United States)*Date AcquiredJuly 23, 2014Publication DateJuly 1, 2014Subject CategoryAeronautics (General)Report/Patent NumberNASA/CR-2014-218287NF1676L-17507Funding Number(s)WBS: WBS 475122.02.07.07.01CONTRACT_GRANT: NNL12AA09CDistribution LimitsPublicCopyrightPublic Use Permitted.Available DownloadsNameType20140010017.pdfSTIcloud_downloadcontent_copyvisibilityRelated RecordsThere are no records associated with this record.visibility_offNo Preview Available
 No Fear Act | Freedom of Information Act | Office of the Inspector General | Agency Financial ReportsNASA Web Privacy Policy and Important Notices | NASA Guidelines for Quality of InformationDisclaimers, Copyright, Terms of Use | Accessibility | NASA OCIO | USA.gov | NASA.govContact Us | Site MapSTI LogoNASA Official: JoAnne R. Calhoun Site Curator: STI Compliance and Distribution Services Last Modified: September 12, 2024
Exhibit 8.1
 
    
    Ascendium Group Limited (incorporated in the British Virgin Islands)
    
    Our Medical Services, Ltd. (incorporated in the British Virgin Islands)
    
    US Proton Therapy Holdings Limited (incorporated in the British Virgin Islands)
    
    China Medical Services Holdings Limited (incorporated in Hong Kong)
    
    Cyber Medical Network Limited (incorporated in Hong Kong)
    
    King Cheers Holding Limited (incorporated in Hong Kong)
    
    China Medstar Pte. Ltd. (incorporated in Singapore)
    
    CMS Hospital Management Co., Ltd. (incorporated in the PRC)
    
    Beijing Xing Heng Feng Medical Technology Co., Ltd. (incorporated in the PRC)
    
    Shenzhen Aohua Medical Services Co., Ltd. (incorporated in the PRC)
    
    Shenzhen Aohua Medical Leasing and Services Co., Ltd. (incorporated in the PRC)
    
    Shenzhen Lingdun Medical Investment & Management Co., Ltd. (incorporated in the PRC)
    
    Tianjin Kangmeng Radiology Equipment Management Co., Ltd. (incorporated in the PRC)
    
    Changan CMS International Cancer Center (incorporated in the PRC)
    
    Medstar (Shanghai) Leasing Co., Ltd. (incorporated in the PRC)
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

DALIA MORALES-VELASQUEZ, 

Petitioner, 

 v. 

JEFFERSON B. SESSIONS III, Attorney 

General, 

Respondent. 

No. 12-71076 

Agency No. A200-904-588 

MEMORANDUM *

On Petition for Review of an Order of the

Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted May 8, 2017**

Before: REINHARDT, LEAVY, and NGUYEN, Circuit Judges.

Dalia Morales-Velasquez, a native and citizen of Guatemala, petitions pro se 

for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ order dismissing her appeal from 

an immigration judge’s decision denying her application for withholding of 

removal and protection under the Convention Against Torture (“CAT”). We have 

 

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent 

except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.

** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision 

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

FILED

MAY 12 2017

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
2 12-71076 

jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We review for substantial evidence the 

agency’s factual findings and review de novo questions of law. Wakkary v. 

Holder, 558 F.3d 1049, 1056 (9th Cir. 2009). We grant the petition for review and

remand.

In denying Morales-Velasquez’s withholding of removal claim the agency 

found she failed to establish Guatemalan authorities would have been unwilling or 

unable to control her persecutors because she did not report the abuse and failed to 

establish that doing so would have been futile or would have subjected her to 

further abuse. Further in reaching its conclusion as to whether the Guatemalan 

government was unwilling or unable to control Morales-Velasquez’s persecutors, 

the agency did not have the benefit of our decision in Bringas-Rodriguez v. 

Sessions, 850 F.3d 1051 (9th Cir. 2017) (en banc).

In denying Morales-Velasquez’s claims, the agency also relied on a 

relocation finding. Substantial evidence does not support the agency’s relocation 

determination, where Morales-Velasquez testified her abuser followed her from the 

United States to Guatemala, beat her, repeatedly raped her, and threatened to kill 

her for leaving without his permission. See Mashiri v. Ashcroft, 383 F.3d 1112, 

1123 (9th Cir. 2004) (agency finding that relocation would be safe and reasonable 

not supported in light of substantial evidence of threats of violence).

Thus, we grant the petition for review and remand Morales-Velasquez’s 
3 12-71076 

withholding of removal and CAT claims for further analysis consistent with this 

disposition. See INS v. Ventura, 537 U.S. 12, 16-18 (2002) (per curiam).

PETITION FOR REVIEW GRANTED; REMANDED.
### §1230. Repealed. Pub. L. 103–382, title II, §212(a)(1), Oct. 20, 1994, 108 Stat. 3913

Section, Pub. L. 90–247, title IV, §421, as added Pub. L. 93–380, title V, §507(a), Aug. 21, 1974, 88 Stat. 565; amended Pub. L. 94–482, title IV, §404(a), Oct. 12, 1976, 90 Stat. 2230; Pub. L. 96–88, title III, §301(a)(1), title V, §507, Oct. 17, 1979, 93 Stat. 677, 692, specified programs subject to provisions of this subchapter.
### Part D—Arts in Education
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### National Institutes of Health

                    Notice is hereby given of a change in the meeting of the National Cancer Institute Special Emphasis Panel, January 24, 2011, 5 p.m. to January 26, 2011, 5 p.m., Bethesda North Marriott Hotel & Conference Center, 5701 Marinelli RD, Bethesda, MD, 20852 which was published in the                     **Federal Register**                     on November 24, 2010, 75 FR 71713.                

This notice is amending the meeting from three days to two days. The new date and time of this meeting is January 25, 2011, 8 a.m. to January 26, 2011, 5 p.m. The meeting is closed to the public.

Dated: January 11, 2011.

Jennifer S. Spaeth,

Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.

[FR Doc. 2011-875 Filed 1-14-11; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4140-01-P
1 

### Cervak, Sarah

From: Hodanbosi, Bob [Bob.Hodanbosi@epa.state.oh.us] Sent: Friday, September 20, 2013 2:12 PM To: Mooney, John; Aburano, Douglas; Arra, Sarah Cc: Braun, Paul Subject: Typo in Ohio EPA Rule 18-04

John and Co.,

I am writing to you to confirm that the version of OAC rule 3745-18-04 under review at US EPA Region V contains a typo. The coal sampling provisions should refer to US EPA Method 19, not Method 9. Ohio EPA will cle an up the rule during the next time that the sulfur dioxide rules are modified. Please let me know if you need any a dditional information.

Thank you.

Bob Hodanbosi
[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 73 (Friday, April 15, 2011)]
[Notices]
[Pages 21406-21407]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2011-9171]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

 DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE

Drug Enforcement Administration

[Docket No. 10-36]


Jacobo Dreszer, M.D.; Decision and Order

ACTION: Correction.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

    On Thursday, April 7, 2011, the Drug Enforcement Administration 
published the above-titled Decision and Order, as well as the Decision 
of the Administrative Law Judge (76 FR 19386). In preparing the 
document for publication, the files were merged resulting in the 
footnotes of the Administrative Law Judge's Decision

[[Page 21407]]

being numbered sequentially to follow the footnote numbers of the 
Decision and Order rather than beginning with the number 1 as they did 
in the ALJ's slip opinion.
    Therefore, this notice corrects footnotes 12 through 67 appearing 
in the Decision signed by the U.S. Administrative Law Judge to be 
footnotes 1 through 56 beginning at 76 FR 19390 under the first column.

    Dated: April 8, 2011.
Michele M. Leonhart,
Administrator.
[FR Doc. 2011-9171 Filed 4-14-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4410-09-P
*Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except

under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

_____________________

No. 00-40492

Summary Calendar

_____________________

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

JAIME ASTUL VELASQUEZ-RIVERA,

Defendant-Appellant.

_________________________________________________________________

Appeal from the United States District Court for the

Southern District of Texas

USDC No. M-00-CR-34-1

_________________________________________________________________

December 4, 2000

Before JOLLY, SMITH, and DeMOSS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Jaime Astul Velasquez-Rivera appeals his conviction and

41-month sentence following his plea of guilty to illegal re-entry

into the United States after deportation, a violation of 8 U.S.C.

§ 1326. Velasquez argues that the felony conviction that resulted

in his increased sentence under 8 U.S.C. § 1326(b)(2) was an

element of the offense that should have been charged in his

indictment. He acknowledges that his argument is foreclosed by
2

Almendarez-Torres v. United States, 523 U.S. 224 (1998), but he

seeks to preserve the issue for Supreme Court review in the light

of Apprendi v. New Jersey, 120 S.Ct. 2348 (2000). Apprendi did not

overrule Almendarez-Torres. See Apprendi, 120 S.Ct. at 2361-62 &

n.15; see also United States v. Dabeit, ___ F.3d ___, 2000 WL

1634264 at *4 (5th Cir. Oct. 30, 2000, No. 00-10065). Velasquez’s

argument is foreclosed. See Almendarez-Torres, 523 U.S. at 235.

A F F I R M E D.
### §§198a to 198c. Transferred

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section 198a, act Aug. 11, 1955, ch. 800, §1, 69 Stat. 684, as amended, which related to the authority of Secretary of the Treasury to issue subpenas, administer oaths and compel attendance of witnesses for purpose of any investigation, was transferred to section 967 of this title.

Section 198b, act Aug. 11, 1955, ch. 800, §2, 69 Stat. 685, which related to service of subpenas and proof of service, was transferred to section 968 of this title.

Section 198c, act Aug. 11, 1955, ch. 800, §3, 69 Stat. 685, which related to contempt proceedings, was transferred to section 969 of this title.
A-AA+Skip to content

                  - Home
                  - Compendium Statistics
                  - Event
                  - Archives
                  - Glossary
                  - Help
                  - Contact
                  - Research on Disability

Annual Disability Statistics Compendium

              - Home /
              - Archives /
              - 2012 Compendium Statistics /
              - 2012 Employment /
              - 2012 2.7 Civilians with Self-Care Disabilities Ages 18-64 Years Living in the Community for the U.S.

## Table 2.7: Employment—Civilians with Self-Care Disabilities Ages 18 to 64 Years Living in the Community for the United States and States: 2011

----

----

 

----

#### 2012 Disability Compendium

                        - Home
                        - Compendium Statistics                           - Population and Prevelance
                          - Employment
                          - Time Trend Population Statistics
                          - Poverty
                          - Earnings
                          - Veterans
                          - Health Insurance Coverage
                          - Health
                          - Social Security Administration Programs
                          - Medicaid and Medicare
                          - Special Education
                          - Vocational Rehabilitation
                          - Federal Government Spending and Employment
                          - International Disability Statistics
                          - Population Statistics: Disability Type
                        - Event
                        - Archives                           - 2012 Compendium Statistics
                        - Glossary
                        - Help
                        - Contact
                        - Research on Disability

#### Funding for this project is made possible by:

 The Research and Training Center on Disability Statistics and Demographics (StatsRRTC), which is funded by the U.S. Department of Education, National Institute for Disability and Rehabilitation Research, under cooperative agreements H133B080012.

#### Stay Connected

**Institute on Disability**10 West Edge Drive, Suite 101Durham, NH 03824603.862.4320 | relay: 711 | [email protected]www.iod.unh.edu

© 2013. Institute on Disability.University of New Hampshire.
(No. 6478

#### The Perkins & Will Partnership, An Illinois Corporation, Claimant, *vs.*State of Illinois, Department of Mental Health, Respondent.

*Opinion filed September 22, 1972.*

William J. Hurley, Attorney for Claimant.

William J. Scott, Attorney General; Saul R. Wexler, Assistant Attorney General, for Respondent.

Perlin, C.J.
### §4341. Cultural experiences grants

#### (a) In general

The Secretary is authorized to, on a competitive basis, make grants to, and enter into contracts and cooperative agreements with, eligible entities to support the activities described in subsection (b).

#### (b) Activities

In carrying out this section, the Secretary shall support activities providing cultural experiences, through appropriate nonprofit organizations with a demonstrated proficiency in providing such activities, that—

(1) enrich the lives of deaf and hard-of-hearing children and adults;

(2) increase public awareness and understanding of deafness and of the artistic and intellectual achievements of deaf and hard-of-hearing persons; or

(3) promote the integration of hearing, deaf, and hard-of-hearing persons through shared cultural, educational, and social experiences.

#### (c) Applications

An eligible entity that desires to receive a grant, or enter into a contract or cooperative agreement, under this section shall submit an application to the Secretary at such time, in such manner, and containing such information as the Secretary may require.

#### (d) Authorization of appropriations

There are authorized to be appropriated to carry out this section such sums as may be necessary for fiscal year 2009 and each of the five succeeding fiscal years.

(Pub. L. 99–371, title I, §121, as added Pub. L. 110–315, title IX, §904(a), Aug. 14, 2008, 122 Stat. 3452.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Prior Provisions

A prior section 4341, Pub. L. 99–371, title III, §301, Aug. 4, 1986, 100 Stat. 786, established Commission on Education of the Deaf, prior to repeal by Pub. L. 102–421, title I, §§101(a)(2), 161, Oct. 16, 1992, 106 Stat. 2151, 2164, effective Oct. 1, 1992.

A prior section 121 of Pub. L. 99–371 was classified to section 4321 of this title, prior to repeal by Pub. L. 102–421.

Prior sections 4342 to 4344 were repealed by Pub. L. 102–421, title I, §§101(a)(2), 161, Oct. 16, 1992, 106 Stat. 2151, 2164, effective Oct. 1, 1992.

Section 4342, Pub. L. 99–371, title III, §302, Aug. 4, 1986, 100 Stat. 786; Pub. L. 101–476, title IX, §901(a)(2), Oct. 30, 1990, 104 Stat. 1142, outlined duties of Commission and provided for reports to Congress.

Section 4343, Pub. L. 99–371, title III, §303, Aug. 4, 1986, 100 Stat. 787, related to personnel of Commission, hearings, quorums, consultation with other entities, information and statistics, and agency cooperation.

Section 4344, Pub. L. 99–371, title III, §304, Aug. 4, 1986, 100 Stat. 788, provided for compensation of members of Commission.
128 STAT. 1882 PUBLIC LAW 113–167—SEPT. 26, 2014 

LEGISLATIVE HISTORY—H.R. 2600: 

CONGRESSIONAL RECORD: 

Vol. 159 (2013): Sept. 25, 26, considered and passed House. 

Vol. 160 (2014): Sept. 18, considered and passed Senate. 

Æ 

Public Law 113–167 

113th Congress 

An Act 

To amend the Interstate Land Sales Full Disclosure Act to clarify how the Act 

applies to condominiums. 

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of 

the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

SECTION 1. EXEMPTION FOR RESIDENTIAL CONDOMINIUM UNITS. 

(a) EXEMPTION.—Section 1403 of the Interstate Land Sales 

Full Disclosure Act (15 U.S.C. 1702) is amended— 

(1) in subsection (b)— 

(A) in paragraph (7)(C), by striking ‘‘or’’ at the end; 

(B) in paragraph (8)(G), by striking the period at the 

end and inserting ‘‘; or’’; and 

(C) by adding at the end the following: 

‘‘(9) the sale or lease of a condominium unit that is not 

exempt under subsection (a).’’; and 

(2) by adding at the end the following: 

‘‘(d) For purposes of subsection (b), the term ‘condominium 

unit’ means a unit of residential or commercial property to be 

designated for separate ownership pursuant to a condominium plan 

or declaration provided that upon conveyance— 

‘‘(1) the owner of such unit will have sole ownership of 

the unit and an undivided interest in the common elements 

appurtenant to the unit; and 

‘‘(2) the unit will be an improved lot.’’. 

SEC. 2. EFFECTIVE DATE. 

The amendments made by this Act shall take effect 180 days 

after the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Approved September 26, 2014. 

15 USC 1702 

note. 

Definition. 

Sept. 26, 2014 

[H.R. 2600] 


dkrause on DSKHT7XVN1PROD with PUBLAWS
§ 9.102 Sonoma Mountain. ( a ) *Name.* The name of the viticultural area described in this section is “Sonoma Mountain.”
( b ) *Approved maps.* The approved maps for determining the boundary of the Sonoma Mountain viticultural area are 2 U.S.G.S. topographic maps in the 7.5 minute series, as follows: ( 1 ) Glen Ellen, Calif., dated 1954, photorevised 1980; and
( 2 ) Kenwood, Calif., dated 1954, photorevised 1980.
( c ) *Boundary.* The Sonoma Mountain viticultural area is located in Sonoma County, California. The boundary is as follows: ( 1 ) The beginning point is the northern most point at which the 1600-foot contour line crosses the section line dividing section 22 from section 23, in Township 6 North, Range 7 West.
( 2 ) The boundary follows this section line north to the 800-foot contour line.
( 3 ) The boundary follows the 800-foot contour line westerly, easterly, and northerly to Bennett Valley Road.
( 4 ) The boundary follows Bennett Valley Road easterly to Enterprise Road.
( 5 ) The boundary follows Enterprise Road southeasterly to an unnamed stream, in Section 7, Township 6 North, Range 7 West, which crosses Enterprise Road near the point at which the road turns from an easterly to a southerly direction.
( 6 ) The boundary follows this stream easterly to the 400-foot contour line.
( 7 ) The boundary follows the 400-foot contour line southerly to the township line dividing Township 6 North from Township 5 North.
( 8 ) The boundary follows a straight line extension of this township line west to the 1200-foot contour line.
( 9 ) The boundary follows the 1200-foot contour line northwesterly to the range line dividing Range 6 West from Range 7 West.
( 10 ) The boundary follows this range line south to the 1600-foot contour line.
( 11 ) The boundary follows this contour line westerly to the beginning point.
[T.D. ATF-196, 50 FR 2979, Jan. 23, 1985, as amended by T.D. ATF-249, 52 FR 5960, Feb. 27, 1987]