alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
The State of TexasAppellee/s



# Fourth Court of Appeals

**San Antonio, Texas**

June 10, 2014

N o. 04

- 14

- 00188

- CR

Mike DAVIS

, Appellant

v.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

From the 175th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Cou rt No. 2011CR0287 Honorable Mary D. Roman, Judge Presiding



### ORDER

The reporter’s record in this appeal was due April 27, 2014 ; however, the court granted the reporter, Charles Richardson, an extension of time until May 27 to file the record. The record was not filed. Instead, the reporter filed a notification of late record on June 9, requesting an additional thirty days to file the record.

We order Charles Richardson to file the record by June 26, 2014 (sixty days after the original due date). Richardson is advised that the court will n ot grant a further extension of time

unless he (1) establishes there are extraordinary circumstances that prevent him from timely filing the record and (2) provides the court reasonable assurance the record will be completed and filed by the requested exte nded deadline.

_________________________________ Luz Elena D. Chapa, Justice

IN WITNESS WHE REOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said

court on this 10th day of June, 2014

.

___________________________________ Keith E. Hottle

Clerk of Court
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

DAY HIGH

 547

 532

 495

 434

 460

 471

 493

 526

 532

 549

 581

 579

 597

 551

 345

 368

 414

 476

 379

 371

 433

 451

 400

 416

 500

 389

 400

 419

 425

 413

 342

 317

 313

 306

 313

 324

 316

 320

 311

 310

 319

 315

 309

 306

 317

 332

 324

 266

 269

 305

 317

 306

 297

 291

 342

 368

 343

 354

 390

 395

 427

 417

 407

 383

 388

 400

 401

 411

 423

 426

 437

 425

 424

 361

 333

 350

 361

 355

 304

 340

 359

 364

 331

 335

 402

 377

 367

 386

 406

 406

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

APRIL 2000 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: May 2, 2000

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

DELTA MENDOTA CANAL AT CHECK 13 (O'NEILL)
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY HIGH

 649

 656

 641

 676

 707

 718

 761

 774

 732

 649

 667

 703

 642

 656

 675

 603

 595

 571

 543

 523

 524

 536

 492

 491

 476

 483

 473

 516

 538

 579

 606

 526

 517

 510

 505

 506

 507

 494

 492

 492

 494

 468

 480

 474

 461

 481

 451

 443

 443

 468

 460

 453

 443

 450

 410

 415

 263

 331

 461

 463

 478

 504

 566

 563

 550

 545

 542

 545

 555

 558

 549

 528

 517

 533

 509

 541

 541

 509

 502

 489

 490

 484

 481

 475

 471

 453

 445

 382

 394

 491

 491

 509

 528

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

OCTOBER 2008 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: November 4, 2008

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

DELTA MENDOTA CANAL AT CHECK 13 (O'NEILL)
---

Exhibit 99.5

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. §1350, AS ADOPTED
PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the annual report of Silver Wheaton Corp.
(the Company) on Form 40-F for the period ended December 31, 2012 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report),
I, Randy V. J. Smallwood, Chief Executive Officer and Director of the Company,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1)     The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)     The information contained in this Report fairly presents,
in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
the Company.

|April 2, 2013 | By: /s/ Randy V. J.
      Smallwood
|------------- | -----------------------------------
|              | Randy V. J. Smallwood              
|              | Chief Executive Officer            

---
C OURT OF A PPEALS FOR THE

F IRST D ISTRICT OF T EXAS AT H OUSTON

O RDER ON M OTION FOR R ECONSIDERATION E N B ANC

Appellate case name: Allen L. Berry, Joseph D. McCord, and Robert G. Taylor, II v.

Encore Bank

Appellate case number: 01

- 14

- 00246

- CV

Trial court case number: 2010

- 63264

Trial court: 152nd District Court of Harris County

Date motion filed: July 1, 2015

Party filing motion: Appellants

It is ordered that the motion for reconsideration en banc is DENIED GRANT ED.

Judge’s signature: /s/ Harvey Brown

Acting individually Acting for the Court

En Banc Panel consists of: Chief Justice Radack and Justices Jennings, Keyes, Higley, Blan d,

Massengale, Brown, Huddle, and Lloyd

Date: September 22, 2015
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

OFFICE OF DISCIPLINARY

COUNSEL,

Petitioner

v.

CHARLES C. SHAINBERG,

Respondent :

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

: No. 2915 Disciplinary Docket No. 3

No. 41 DB 2022

Attorney Registration No. 19420

(Philadelphia)

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW , this 13 th day of October , 2022

, upon consideration of the

Recommendation of the Three

- Member Panel of the Disciplinary Board, the Joint Petition

in Suppo rt of Discipline on Consent is GRANTED , and Charles C. Shainberg is

suspended on consent from the Bar of this Commonwealth for a period of one year.

Respondent shall comply with all the provisions of Pa.R.D.E. 217 and pay costs to the

Disciplinary Board. See Pa.R.D.E. 208(g).
### ISSUED: November 16, 2016 U.S. DEPARTMENT OF

**TRANSPORTATIO EPARTMENT**  

## OF OFFICE OF HEARINGS 

### TRANSPORTATION WASHINGTON, DC 

### I 

# sc ZOli NOV 

## 11 A : ., In The Matter Of : 

## DOCKET O PERATtO 

## S Docket No . FAA-2014-1116 Pacific International Skydiving Center ) ) ) ) ) Respondent

TO: Frank "T.K." Hinshaw c/o Skydive Hawaii 68-760 Farrington Hwy Waialua HI 96791 Case No. 2014WP130012
SUBPOENA

Pursuant to 14 C.F.R. § 13.205(a)(3), YOU ARE HEREBY COMMANDED to appear and testify at a hearing scheduled to begin at the following place, date, and time: 

### 1. Location:


### 2. Date: 3. Time: United States District Court, District ofHawaii 300 Ala Moana Blvd. Honolulu, HI 96850 December 13 , 2016 9:00 a.m. local time This subpoena is issued because the Respondent, Pacific International Skydiving Center, filed an application on November 12, 2016 requesting your presence to testify at this hearing. If you have any questions about the subpoena, you should contact the Respondent' s counsel at the address and telephone number listed below. The provisions of 14 C.F .R. § 13 .228(b) allow you to file a motion to quash or modify this subpoena with the undersignedjudge. The applicant shall describe, in detail, the basis for the application to quash or modify the subpoena including, but not limited to, a statement that the testimony is not relevant to the proceeding or that the subpoena is unreasonable and oppressive. A motion to quash or modify the subpoena will stay the effect ofthe subpoena pending a decision by the undersignedjudge on the motion. Pursuant to 14 C.F.R. § 13.229, you are entitled to the same fees and mileage expenses as arepaid to witnesses appearing in the courts ofthe United States. These fees shall be paid by the Respondent, the party at whose request you have been subpoenaed. Ifyou fail or refuse to comply with this subpoena, a party may, in accordance with 14 C.F.R 

### § 13 .228( c), apply to the local federal district court to seekjudicial enforcement ofthe subpoena.

Subpoena issued at the request of: Robert L. Feldman, Respondent's Counsel 8900 SW 107th Avenue, Suite 203 Miami, FL 33176 TEL: 305-598-4841 FAX: 305-598-4842

Docket No. FAA-2014-1116 

# ~--=====:=~.--- DOUGLAS M. RAW ALD Administrative Law Judge

Subpoena, page 2
EXHIBIT 12.2

 

**FORM 10-QPACCAR FINANCIAL CORP.**

 

**COMPUTATION OF RATIO OF EARNINGS TO FIXEDCHARGES**

** **

#### **PURSUANT TO THE SUPPORT AGREEMENT**BETWEEN THE COMPANY AND PACCAR(Millions of Dollars)

 
|                               |   | **Six Months  Ended** |     |
|------------------------------------|--------|-----------------------|----------|
|                               |   | **June 30**           |     |
|                               |   | **2002**              |     | **2001** |   |
|                               |   | (Unaudited)           |     |
|                               |   |                  |     |   |   |
| FIXED CHARGES                      |   |                  |     |   |   |
| Interest expense                   |   | **$**                 | **61.3** |   | $ | 95.0 |   |
| Facility and equipment rental      |   | **.8**                |     | .8 |   |
|                               |   |                  |     |   |   |
| TOTAL FIXED CHARGES                |   | **$**                 | **62.1** |   | $ | 95.8 |   |
|                               |   |                  |     |   |   |
| EARNINGS                           |   |                  |     |   |   |
| Income before taxes                |   | **$**                 | **12.4** |   | $ | 7.2 |   |
| Depreciation                       |   | **6.6**               |     | 6.5 |   |
|                               |   |                  |     |   |   |
|                               |   | **19.0**              |     | 13.7 |   |
| Fixed charges                      |   | **62.1**              |     | 95.8 |   |
|                               |   |                  |     |   |   |
| EARNINGS AS DEFINED                |   | **$**                 | **81.1** |   | $ | 109.5 |   |
|                               |   |                  |     |   |   |
| RATIO OF EARNINGS TO FIXED CHARGES |   | **1.31x**             |     | 1.14x |   |

 

 

----
#### Eva Roesler, an Infant, by Her Guardian ad Litem, Victoria Roesler, Respondent, v. Dunkirk Home Telephone Company, Appellant.

Order denying motion for new trial upon ground of newly-discovered evidence affirmed, with costs. Judgment and order denying motion for new trial upon the minutes of the court reversed and new trial granted, with costs to appellant to abide event. Held, that the exception to the charge per*924mitting the jury to award damages for permanent injuries and the refusal to charge specifically upon that subject as requested was error. All concurred.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY HIGH

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 16,866

 16,378

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 4,816

 4,671

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 9,007

 10,490

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

AUGUST 2017 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: September 28, 2017

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

PORT CHICAGO BOTTOM IN SUISUN BAY
- National Clean Diesel Campaign: Working Together for Cleaner Air,  EPA-420-F-09-063
- National Clean Diesel Campaign: Funding Your Clean Diesel Project,        EPA-420-F-09-071
- National Clean Diesel Campaign: Tools and Resources,                    EPA-420-F-09-070
§ 9.274 Palos Verdes Peninsula. ( a ) *Name.* The name of the viticultural area described in this section is “Palos Verdes Peninsula”. For purposes of part 4 of this chapter, “Palos Verdes Peninsula” is a term of viticultural significance.
( b ) *Approved maps.* The three United States Geological Survey (USGS) 1:24,000 scale topographic maps used to determine the boundary of the Palos Verdes Peninsula viticultural area are titled: ( 1 ) Redondo Beach, CA, 1996;
( 2 ) Torrance, Calif., 1964 (photorevised 1981); and
( 3 ) San Pedro Calif., 1964 (photorevised 1981).
( c ) *Boundary.* The Palos Verdes Peninsula viticultural area is located in the southwestern coastal region of Los Angeles County, and contains the cities of Palos Verdes Estates, Rolling Hills, Rolling Hills Estates, and Rancho Palos Verdes, California. The boundary of the Palos Verdes Peninsula viticultural area is as described below: ( 1 ) The beginning point is on the Redondo Beach map at the intersection of the Pacific Ocean and the Torrance corporate boundary at Malaga Cove, R14W/T4S; then
( 2 ) From the beginning point, proceed east, then generally southeast, along the Torrance corporate boundary, crossing onto the Torrance map, to the corporate boundary's intersection with the Lomita corporate boundary, R14W/T4S; then
( 3 ) Proceed generally southeast along the Lomita corporate boundary to its intersection with Western Avenue, R14W/T4S; then
( 4 ) Proceed south along Western Avenue, crossing onto the San Pedro map, to the road's intersection with the Los Angeles city boundary, R14W/T5S; then
( 5 ) Proceed west, then generally south, then southwest along the Los Angeles city boundary to its intersection with the Pacific Ocean at Palos Verdes Peninsula Park, R14W/T5S; then
( 6 ) Proceed clockwise along the Pacific coastline to return to the beginning point.
[T.D. TTB-166, 86 FR 32191, June 17, 2021]
### Part D—Dissemination of Treatment Information
### §9109. Prohibition on use of funds for construction

No funds appropriated to carry out this chapter, subchapter II of this chapter, or subchapter III of this chapter may be used for construction expenses.

(Pub. L. 94–462, title II, §210A, as added Pub. L. 108–81, title I, §105, Sept. 25, 2003, 117 Stat. 997.)
### IMPORTATION OR EXPORTATION
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1999
<CASH>                                         494,689
<SECURITIES>                                 1,123,037
<RECEIVABLES>                                  820,206
<ALLOWANCES>                                   128,046
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             4,924,861
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                 205,319
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               6,792,647
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        1,906,097
<BONDS>                                      1,500,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           302
<OTHER-SE>                                   3,673,951
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 6,792,647
<SALES>                                     27,914,626
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            27,914,626
<CGS>                                       22,217,764
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               22,217,764
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             5,293,877
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              78,041
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                402,985
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            402,985
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   402,985
<EPS-BASIC>                                       0.13
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.11


</TABLE>
AAM-12-256-E April 24, 2012

Exemption No. 10515 Regulatory Docket No. FAA-2012-0239

Mr. William Zeffiro Substance Prevention/Abuse Program Manager Air Ventures Hawaii, LLC

P.O. Box 3350 Lihue, HI 96766

Dear Mr. Zeffiro:

This letter is to inform you that we have granted your request for exemption. It transmits our decision, explains its basis, and gives you the conditions and limitations of the exemption, including the date it ends.

The Basis for Our Decision

By letter dated March 20, 2012, you petitioned the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) on behalf of Air Ventures Hawaii, LLC (Air Vent ures Hawaii), for an exemption from part 120 of Title 14, Code of Federal Regulations (14 CFR). That exemption, if granted, would allow Air Ventures Hawaii, which is operating under separate parts of the regulations, to cover its safety-sensitive employees under one drug and alcohol testing program.

The FAA has determined that good cause exists for not publishing a summary of the petition

in the Federal Register because the requested exemption would not set a precedent, and any delay in acting on this petition would be detrimental to Air Ventures Hawaii.

The FAA has issued a grant of exemption in circumstances similar in all material respects to those presented in your petition. In Grant of Exemption No. 9703 (copy enclosed), the FAA found that Solid Edge’s § 91.147 air tour operations were closely connected to its part 135 operations. The FAA also found that combining the petitioner’s two testing programs into one would be in the public interest and would maintain an equivalent level of safety to that provided by the current regulations. Thus, the FAA concluded it was unnecessary to burden the petitioner by requiring it to conduct two separate testing programs.2

Having reviewed your reasons for requesting an exemption, I find that—

 they are similar in all material respects to relief previously requested in the enclosed Grant of Exemption No. 9703;

 the reasons stated by the FAA for granting the enclosed Grant of Exemption No. 9703 also apply to the situation you present; and

 a grant of exemption is in the public interest.

Our Decision

Under the authority contained in 49 U.S.C. 40113 and 44701, which the FAA Administrator has delegated to me, I hereby grant Air Ventures Hawaii, LLC an exemption from 14 CFR part 120 to the extent necessary to allow Air Ventures Hawaii, which is operating under separate parts of the regulations, to cover its safety-sensitive employees under one testing program, subject to the conditions and limitations described below.

Conditions and Limitations

1. Employees of Air Ventures Hawaii are subject to the drug and alcohol regulations at all times while conducting operations under part 135 or part 91.

2. The drug and alcohol testing program must be implemented under the auspices of the Air Ventures Hawaii part 135 operation, not under part 91.

This exemption terminates on April 30, 2014, unless sooner superseded or rescinded.

Sincerely,

/s/
James R. Fraser, M.D. Deputy Federal Air Surgeon

Enclosure
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY HIGH

 11,080

 11,365

 11,629

 11,980

 13,795

 15,882

 15,819

 17,831

 20,378

 20,562

 18,918

 17,803

 15,598

 14,950

 14,777

 15,777

 16,202

 16,670

 15,602

 15,105

 15,245

 16,388

 15,673

 16,318

 16,356

 16,848

 15,210

 16,752

 16,078

 15,566

 15,620

 1,975

 2,839

 2,982

 3,531

 4,282

 3,673

 3,753

 4,880

 6,095

 6,493

 6,159

 5,929

 5,809

 5,234

 5,904

 6,761

 7,722

 8,315

 7,381

 5,881

 5,092

 4,864

 4,200

 4,234

 4,107

 4,257

 4,698

 4,810

 5,644

 4,623

 5,188

 7,311

 7,422

 7,518

 7,821

 8,798

 8,837

 9,196

 10,674

 12,593

 13,069

 11,928

 12,127

 11,308

 10,509

 10,666

 11,315

 11,674

 11,763

 11,304

 10,026

 10,253

 10,376

 9,996

 10,269

 10,229

 10,448

 10,711

 11,133

 11,636

 9,955

 10,220

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

MAY 2020 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: June 2, 2020

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

PORT CHICAGO TOP IN SUISUN BAY
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY ELEV

 123.75

 124.75

 123.99

 123.68

 123.95

 124.30

 124.32

 123.80

 123.80

 124.85

 123.81

 123.57

 123.49

 122.60

 123.27

 124.19

 123.69

 123.61

 123.91

 123.58

 123.61

 124.17

 124.10

 123.71

 124.14

 124.43

 123.56

 124.76

 124.78

 123.93

 124.50

 8,144

 8,636

 8,256

 8,111

 8,238

 8,411

 8,421

 8,167

 8,167

 8,686

 8,172

 8,059

 8,021

 7,611

 7,918

 8,356

 8,115

 8,078

 8,219

 8,064

 8,078

 8,346

 8,311

 8,125

 8,331

 8,476

 8,054

 8,641

 8,651

 8,228

 8,511

STORAGE

+137

+492

-380

-145

+127

+173

+10

-254

+0

+519

-514

-113

-38

-410

+307

+438

-241

-37

+141

-155

+14

+268

-35

-186

+206

+145

-422

+587

+10

-423

+283

CHANGE

4,596

4,650

4,362

4,429

4,654

4,612

3,966

3,874

3,992

4,097

3,650

3,805

3,965

3,783

4,130

4,096

3,851

3,908

3,585

3,376

3,462

3,481

3,375

3,409

3,544

3,558

3,295

3,722

3,495

3,261

3,650

INFLOW

 4,425

 4,302

 4,454

 4,401

 4,489

 4,424

 3,858

 3,899

 3,889

 3,732

 3,806

 3,758

 3,880

 3,628

 3,647

 3,772

 3,870

 3,823

 3,410

 3,348

 3,347

 3,238

 3,285

 3,395

 3,332

 3,377

 3,400

 3,317

 3,381

 3,366

 3,399

POWER

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 259

 225

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

SPILL

 60

 60

 60

 60

 60

 60

 60

 60

 60

 60

 60

 60

 60

 60

 60

 60

 60

 60

 60

 60

 60

 60

 60

 60

 60

 60

 60

 60

 60

 60

 60

HATCHERY

 2

 0

 0

 1

 1

 1

 3

 3

 3

 3

 3

 4

 4

 3

 3

 3

 3

 4

 4

 3

 3

 3

 3

 3

 3

 3

 3

 4

 4

 3

 3

C.F.S.

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

MAY 2009 LAKE NATOMA DAILY OPERATIONS RUN DATE: June 1, 2009

IN LAKE

EVAP

C.F.S.

COMPUTED*

ACRE-FEET

RELEASE - C.F.S.

TOTALS +504 119,633 115,652 484 1,860 86

ACRE-FEET +504 237,292 229,396 960 3,689 171

COMMENTS:

* COMPUTED INFLOW IS THE SUM OF CHANGE IN STORAGE, RELEASES AND EVAPORATION.

SUMMARY

RELEASES (ACRE-FEET)

POWER 229,396

SPILL 960

FOLSOM SOUTH CANAL

HATCHERY

 2,575

 3,689

 8,007

FOLSOM

SOUTH 

CANAL

 40

 40

 40

 40

 40

 40

 40

 40

 40

 40

 40

 40

 40

 40

 40

 40

 40

 40

 40

 43

 45

 45

 45

 45

 45

 45

 45

 45

 45

 45

 45

 1,298

 2,575

(1)

(1) INCHES OF EVAPORATION TAKEN FROM FOLSOM PAN.

RELEASES (ACRE-FEET)

TOTAL 236,620
EXHIBIT 32
 CCFNB BANCORP, INC.
 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
  1.
    
    The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and2.
    
    The information contained in this Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.
  /s/ Lance O. DiehlLance O. DiehlPresident and Chief Executive Officer
(Principal Executive Officer)  /s/ Jeffrey T. ArnoldJeffrey T. Arnold CPA, CIAChief Financial Officer and Treasurer
(Principal Financial Officer) 39