alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
### §9547. Cooperative education statistics systems

The Statistics Center may establish 1 or more national cooperative education statistics systems for the purpose of producing and maintaining, with the cooperation of the States, comparable and uniform information and data on early childhood education, elementary and secondary education, postsecondary education, adult education, and libraries, that are useful for policymaking at the Federal, State, and local levels.

(Pub. L. 107–279, title I, §157, Nov. 5, 2002, 116 Stat. 1962.)
**HOME | 	  ABOUT US | 	  CONTACT | 	  REGIONAL MANAGERS**Nautical Charts & Pubs****Surveys & Wrecks****GIS & Other Products****Research & Development****Customer Service****Business Opportunities****Education****NGA Chart: 81345          Scale: 72,830          Edition: 3          Edition Date: 13-JUN-98          CORRECTED TO NTM:  1998/38**Notice Listing-  **Click the +/- buttons and drag the slider tool (solid triangle) 				to zoom in and out.** 
-  **Click the arrow buttons to pan left/right and up/down.** 
-  **Drag 				the navigation box in the upper left hand corner to move around 				the chart image.								This chart display or derived product can be used as a planning or analysis tool and may not be used as a navigational aid. 								NOTE: Use the official, full scale NGA nautical chart for real navigation whenever possible.  These are available from authorized 				NGA nautical chart sales agents.  Screen captures of the on-line viewable charts available here do NOT fulfill chart carriage 				requirements for regulated commercial vessels under Titles 33 and 46 of the Code of Federal Regulations.								Adobe Flash Player		  		is required to view the chart image.				Powered by Zoomify.** 
Privacy  |  Disclaimer  |  NOAA's National Ocean Service  |  NOAA  |  U.S. Department of Commerce **
APPLICATION 

UNDER THE 

SMALL 

COMMUNITY 

AIR 

SERVICE 

DEVELOPMENT 

PROGRAM

ARCATA/EUREKA 

AIRPORT

SUMMARY INFORMATION

A. Applicant Information: 

(Check all that apply)

X

Not a 

Consortium

Interstate 

Consortium

Intrastate 

Consortium

Community now receives EAS subsidy

X

Community (or Consortium member) previously 

received a Small Community Grant

If previous recipient, date of grant: 09/17/2004

Expiration date of grant: 09/14/2006

Federal funds requested: $500,000

Carrier(s) service obtained: Alaska Airlines

Destination(s) served: Los Angeles

B. Public/Private Partnerships: 

(List organization names)

Public Private

Humboldt County

Arcata/Eureka Airport

Redwood Region 

Economic Development 

Commission

C. Project Proposal: 

(Check all that apply)

X Marketing X Start-Up Cost 

Offset

Travel Bank X Secure Additional 

Service

Surface 

Transportation X New Route

X Launch New Carrier Subsidy

Study X Revenue 

Guarantee

Upgrade Aircraft First Service

Service Restoration Other (specify): Regional Service

D. Existing Landing Aids at Local Airport:

X Full ILS X Published Instrument Approach

X Localizer X Outer/Middle Marker

X Other (specify): GPS

E. Project Cost:

Line Description

Sub 

Total

Total 

Amount

1 Federal amount 

requested $750,000

2 State cash financial 

contribution $0

Local cash financial 

contribution

3a. Airport cash funds $27,600

3b. Non-airport cash

funds $259,420

3 Total local cash funds 

(3a+3b) $287,020

4 TOTAL CASH FUNDING 

(1+2+3) $1,037,020

In-Kind contribution

5a. Airport In-Kind 

contribution ** $37,545

5b. Other In-Kind 

contribution** $73,800

5

TOTAL IN-KIND 

CONTRIBUTION 

(5a+5b)

$111,345

6 TOTAL PROJECT 

COST (4+5) $1,148,365

F. In-Kind Contributions**:

For funds in lines 5a (Airport In-Kind contribution) and 5b 

(Other In-Kind contribution), please describe the source(s) of 

fund(s) for each.

5a. Landing fee waiver; program administration

5b. Marketing; program administration

G. Is this application 

subject to review by 

State under Executive 

Order 12372 process?

c. Program is not 

covered by E.O. 

12372.

H. Is the Applicant 

delinquent on any 

Federal debt? (if “yes”, 

provide explanation)

X No

X
Customer Service Hotline: 1-800-438-2474

UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

REGION III

1650 Arch Street

Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19103-2029

February 1, 2011

Ms. Joyce E. Epps, Director

Pennsylvania Department of Environmental Protection

Bureau of Air Quality

Rachel Carson State Office Building

P.O. Box 2063

Harrisburg, PA 17105-2063

Dear Ms. Epps:

On January 4, 2011, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) received a revision 

to the Pennsylvania State Implementation Plan (SIP) from the Pennsylvania Department of 

Environmental Protection (PADEP). This revision pertains to amendments to 25 Pa. Code

Chapters 121 and 129, which amends the existing regulations at §§ 121.1 and 129.51, and adds 

new § 129.52c for control of volatile organic compound (VOC) emissions from flat wood 

paneling surface coating processes. EPA has determined that the submittal is administratively

and technically complete, and is reviewing it to prepare a Notice of Proposed Rulemaking (NPR).

If members of your staff have any questions, they may direct them to Irene Shandruk, 

Office of Air Program Planning, at 215- 814-2166. She is the principal contact for this 

rulemaking. 

Sincerely, 

/s/

 Diana Esher, Director

 Air Protection Division 

cc: Arleen Shulman, PADEP
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
 Washington, D.C. 20549
 FORM 8-K
 CURRENT REPORT
PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE
SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
 Date of Report (Date of earliest event reported): July 13, 2011
 SRA INTERNATIONAL, INC.
 (Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
 Delaware
    
    001-31334
    
    54-1360804(State or other jurisdiction 
of incorporation)
    
    (Commission
File Number)
    
    (IRS Employer
Identification No.)
 4300 Fair Lakes Court Fairfax, Virginia
    
    22033(Address of Principal Executive Offices)
    
    (Zip Code)
 (Registrants telephone number, including area code): (703) 803-1500
  o
    
    Written communications pursuant to Rule 425 under the Securities Act (17 CFR 230.425)
 o
    
    Soliciting material pursuant to Rule 14a-12 under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.14a-12)
 o
    
    Pre-commencement communications pursuant to Rule 14d-2(b) under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.14d-2(b))
 o
    
    Pre-commencement communications pursuant to Rule 13e-4(c) under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.13e-4(c))




---



##### 



Item 8.01
    
    Other Events
   The information in this Item 8.01 will be deemed filed for purposes of Section 18 of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and will be deemed to be incorporated by reference
into the Companys Schedule 14A, as amended, initially filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on April 18, 2011.
 Forward-Looking Statements




---



##### 



Important Additional Information
  www.sec.gov Investor@sra.com




---



##### 








---



##### 



SIGNATURES
  SRA INTERNATIONAL, INC.Date:  July 13, 2011
    By:
    /s/ MARK D. SCHULTZMark D. SchultzSenior Vice President & General Counsel
§ 72.40 Acquisition for official use and sale for account of petitioner in allowed petitions. ( a ) *Acquisition for official use.* The property or carrier may be purchased by the United States pursuant to agreement and retained for official use. Where the petitioner is the owner, the purchase price is the appraised value of the property or carrier less all costs. Where the petitioner is a creditor, the purchase price is whichever one of these amounts is the smaller: ( 1 ) The petitioner's equity, or
( 2 ) the appraised value of the property or carrier less the amount of all costs incident to the seizure and forfeiture.
( b ) *Sale for account of petitioner.* The petitioner may elect not to comply with the condition on which the property or carrier may be returned. In this event, the Director or his delegate is authorized to sell it. Where the petitioner is the owner of the property or carrier, there is deducted from the proceeds of the sale all costs incident to the seizure, forfeiture, and sale, and the Director or his delegate pays to the petitioner, out of the proper appropriation, an amount equal to the balance, if any. Where the petitioner is a creditor, there is deducted from the proceeds of the sale all costs incident to the seizure, forfeiture, and sale, and the Director or his delegate pays to the petitioner, out of the proper appropriation, an amount equal to the balance, if any, of the selling price after deduction of all costs incident to the seizure, forfeiture, or sale: *Provided,* That if the amount of such balance exceeds the amount of the equity of the petitioner, only the latter amount is paid to the petitioner.
[T.D. ATF-9, 39 FR 9954, Mar. 15, 1974, as amended by T.D. ATF-183, 49 FR 37061, Sept. 21, 1984]
*Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the Court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except

under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

____________________

No. 96-50946

Summary Calendar

____________________

ALEX ALVARADO,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

EL PASO INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DISTRICT, et al.,

Defendants-Appellants.

_________________________________________________________________

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Western District of Texas

(EP-91-CV-357)

_________________________________________________________________

August 29, 1997

Before WIENER, BARKSDALE, and EMILIO M. GARZA, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Concerning an action under 42 U.S.C. § 1983, for deprivation

of a property interest without due process, the summary judgment

awarded the defendants was upheld on appeal. Defendants now appeal

the district court’s denial of their motion for award of attorneys’

fees under 42 U.S.C. § 1988.

Defendants contend that the district court erred in finding

that the plaintiff established a prima facie case under § 1983.

The district court’s denial of attorneys’ fees was not an abuse of
- 2 -

discretion. See United States v. Mississippi, 921 F.2d 604, 609

(5th Cir. 1991).

 AFFIRMED
### §9576. Authority to publish

#### (a) Publication

The Director may prepare and publish (including through oral presentation) such research, statistics (consistent with part C), and evaluation information and reports from any office, board, committee, and center of the Institute, as needed to carry out the priorities and mission of the Institute without the approval of the Secretary or any other office of the Department.

#### (b) Advance copies

The Director shall provide the Secretary and other relevant offices with an advance copy of any information to be published under this section before publication.

#### (c) Peer review

All research, statistics, and evaluation reports conducted by, or supported through, the Institute shall be subjected to rigorous peer review before being published or otherwise made available to the public.

#### (d) Items not covered

Nothing in subsections 1 (a), (b), or (c) shall be construed to apply to—

(1) information on current or proposed budgets, appropriations, or legislation;

(2) information prohibited from disclosure by law or the Constitution, classified national security information, or information described in section 552(b) of title 5; and

(3) review by officers of the United States in order to prevent the unauthorized disclosure of information described in paragraph (1) or (2).

(Pub. L. 107–279, title I, §186, Nov. 5, 2002, 116 Stat. 1973.)

1 So in original. Probably should be "subsection".
#### DEALER COMPUTER SERVICES INC, formerly known as Ford Dealer Computer Services Inc, Plaintiff-Appellant v. FORD MOTOR COMPANY, Defendant-Appellee.

No. 06-20382.

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.

Decided July 17, 2006.

John C. Allen, Houston, TX, for Plaintiff-Appellant.

Keith Alan Langley, Winstead, Sechrest & Minick, Dallas, TX, for Defendant-Appellee.

Before JOLLY, PRADO, and OWEN, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: *

AFFIRM. *See*5th Circuit Rule 47.6.

*

 Pursuant to 5th Circuit Rule 47.5, the Court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Circuit Rule 47.5.4.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

DAY ELEV

 576.13

 576.11

 576.84

 577.35

 578.03

 578.14

 578.06

 577.72

 578.12

 578.07

 577.83

 577.81

 577.72

 577.84

 578.05

 577.85

 578.11

 577.89

 577.70

 577.61

 577.30

 577.25

 577.01

 576.74

 576.47

 576.17

 575.50

 575.00

 574.54

 574.05

 511.4

 511.3

 514.9

 517.3

 520.7

 521.2

 520.8

 519.2

 521.1

 520.9

 519.7

 519.6

 519.2

 519.7

 520.8

 519.8

 521.1

 520.0

 519.1

 518.6

 517.1

 516.9

 515.7

 514.4

 513.1

 511.6

 508.3

 505.9

 503.7

 501.4

STORAGE

-0.1

-0.1

+3.6

+2.5

+3.3

+0.5

-0.4

-1.7

+2.0

-0.2

-1.2

-0.1

-0.4

+0.6

+1.0

-1.0

+1.3

-1.1

-0.9

-0.4

-1.5

-0.2

-1.2

-1.3

-1.3

-1.5

-3.2

-2.4

-2.2

-2.4

CHANGE

5,614

5,178

6,143

5,158

6,199

6,216

5,717

4,537

5,785

4,229

3,462

4,264

4,418

5,342

6,251

5,776

6,663

6,345

5,619

5,042

4,000

4,410

3,661

3,331

3,432

3,785

3,317

3,845

3,829

3,600

INFLOW

 841

 807

 718

 659

 810

 939

 1,012

 1,040

 884

 734

 650

 749

 820

 888

 1,021

 1,026

 958

 896

 875

 875

 846

 830

 831

 876

 833

 932

 1,027

 1,004

 987

 988

MADERA

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 31

 21

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

SPILL

 4,555

 4,211

 3,377

 3,000

 3,239

 3,919

 4,117

 4,083

 3,504

 2,968

 2,975

 3,306

 3,575

 3,894

 4,104

 4,276

 3,698

 3,797

 4,000

 3,707

 3,498

 3,422

 3,149

 2,865

 2,977

 3,334

 3,645

 3,751

 3,636

 3,502

FRIANT-KERN

 86

 30

 79

 65

 62

 54

 33

 54

 40

 25

 52

 56

 43

 62

 56

 92

 73

 78

 60

 57

 62

 82

 74

 54

 87

 57

 66

 80

 92

 68

C.F.S.

 .55

 .19

 .50

 .41

 .39

 .34

 .21

 .34

 .25

 .16

 .33

 .35

 .27

 .39

 .35

 .58

 .46

 .49

 .38

 .36

 .39

 .52

 .47

 .34

 .55

 .36

 .42

 .51

 .59

 .44

INCHES

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .14

 .78

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

PRECIP

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

JUNE 2000 MILLERTON LAKE DAILY OPERATIONS RUN DATE: July 3, 2000

IN LAKE

EVAPORATION

INCHES

C.F.S.

COMPUTED*

1000 ACRE-FEET

RELEASE - C.F.S. 

TOTALS -10.1 145,168 26,356 108,084 52 1,879 11.89 .92

ACRE-FEET -10,138 287,941 52,277 214,385 103 3,727

COMMENTS:

* COMPUTED INFLOW IS THE SUM OF CHANGE IN STORAGE, RELEASES, PUMPING AND EVAPORATION.

SUMMARY

RELEASE (ACRE-FEET)

CANALS

FRIANT-KERN

MADERA

 214,385

 52,277 294,350

PRECIPITATION

THIS MONTH =

JULY 1, 1999 TO DATE = 19.53

 511.5

 27,585 0.92

CANALS

AT FRIANT

TOTAL RELEASES

OUTLET

 181

 179

 178

 178

 410

 1,000

 733

 199

 368

 626

 378

 202

 202

 202

 551

 876

 1,291

 2,118

 1,153

 625

 359

 199

 199

 198

 198

 198

 216

 230

 230

 230

RIVER

 13,907

 27,585

RIVER
**EXHIBIT 12.1**

 

**FORM 10-Q**

**PACCAR FINANCIAL CORP.**

 

### **COMPUTATION OF RATIO OF EARNINGS TO FIXED CHARGES**

 

### **PURSUANT TO SEC REPORTING REQUIREMENTS**

### **(Millions ofDollars)**

 
| ** **                         | ** ** | **Nine  Months Ended  September 30** | ** ** |
|------------------------------------|------------|--------------------------------------|------------|
|                               |       | **2002**                             |       | **2001** |   |
| FIXED CHARGES                      |       |                                 |       |   |   |
| Interest expense                   |       | **$**                                | **89.1**   |   | $ | 135.3 |   |
| Portion of rentals deemed interest |       | **.8**                               |       | .8 |   |
|                               |       |                                 |       |   |   |
| TOTAL FIXED CHARGES                |       | **$**                                | **89.9**   |   | $ | 136.1 |   |
|                               |       |                                 |       |   |   |
| EARNINGS                           |       |                                 |       |   |   |
| Income before income taxes         |       | **$**                                | **27.1**   |   | $ | 7.4* |   |
| Fixed charges                      |       | **89.9**                             |       | 136.1 |   |
|                               |       |                                 |       |   |   |
| EARNINGS AS DEFINED                |       | **$**                                | **117.0**  |   | $ | 143.5 |   |
|                               |       |                                 |       |   |   |
| RATIO OF EARNINGS TO FIXED CHARGES |       | **1.30x**                            |       | 1.05x |   |

 

 

The method of computing the ratio of earnings tofixed charges shown above complies with SEC reporting requirements but differsfrom the method called for in the Support Agreement between the Company andPACCAR as shown in Exhibit 12.2.

 

*           Incomebefore income taxes for the nine months ended September 30, 2001 has beenadjusted to exclude $.7 pretax income from the cumulative effect of theaccounting change related to FAS 133.

 

 

----
§ 7.3 General requirements and prohibitions under the FAA Act. ( a ) *Certificates of label approval (COLAs).* Subject to the requirements and exceptions set forth in the regulations in subpart B of this part, any brewer or wholesaler who bottles malt beverages, and any person who removes malt beverages in containers from customs custody for sale or any other commercial purpose, is required to first obtain from TTB a certificate of label approval (COLA) covering the label(s) on each container.
( b ) *Alteration, mutilation, destruction, obliteration, or removal of labels.* Subject to the requirements and exceptions set forth in the regulations in subpart C of this part, it is unlawful to alter, mutilate, destroy, obliterate, or remove labels on malt beverage containers. This prohibition applies to any person, including retailers, holding malt beverages for sale in interstate or foreign commerce or any person holding malt beverages for sale after shipment in interstate or foreign commerce.
( c ) *Labeling requirements for malt beverages.* Subject to the jurisdictional limits of the FAA Act, as set forth in § 7.4, it is unlawful for any person engaged in business as a brewer, wholesaler, or importer of malt beverages, directly or indirectly, or through an affiliate, to sell or ship, or deliver for sale or shipment, or otherwise introduce or receive in interstate or foreign commerce, or remove from customs custody, any malt beverages in containers unless such containers are marked, branded, labeled, and packaged in conformity with the regulations in this part.
( d ) *Labeled in accordance with this part.* In order to be labeled in accordance with the regulations in this part, a container of malt beverages must be in compliance with the following requirements: ( 1 ) It must bear one or more labels meeting the standards for “labels” set forth in subpart D of this part;
( 2 ) One or more of the labels on the container must include the mandatory information set forth in subpart E of this part;
( 3 ) Claims on any label, container, or packaging (as defined in § 7.81) must comply with the rules for restricted label statements, as applicable, set forth in subpart F of this part;
( 4 ) Statements or any other representations on any malt beverage label, container, or packaging (as defined in §§ 7.101 and 7.121) may not violate the regulations in subparts G and H of this part regarding certain practices on labeling of malt beverages; and
( 5 ) The class and type designation on any label, as well as any designation appearing on containers or packaging, must comply with the standards for classes and types set forth in subpart I of this part.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

MIDDLE DISTRICT

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

Respondent

v.

TABU NAZSHON PHILLIPS,

Petitioner

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 425 MAL 2016

Petition for Allowance of Appeal from 

the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 22nd day of November, 2016, the Petition for Allowance of 

Appeal is DENIED.

Justice Mundy did not participate in the consideration or decision of this matter.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### National Institutes of Health

Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as amended (5 U.S.C. App.), notice is hereby given of the following meeting.

The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

*Name of Committee:*                         Center for Scientific Review Special Emphasis Panel; Program Project: Research Resources Site Visit.                    

*Date:*                         May 22-24, 2011.                    

*Time:*                         7 p.m. to 2 p.m.                    

*Agenda:*                         To review and evaluate grant applications.                    

*Place:*                         Doubletree Guest Suites Santa Monica, 1707 Fourth Street, Santa Monica, CA 90401.                    

*Contact Person:*                         Lee Rosen, PhD, Scientific Review Officer, Center for Scientific Review, National Institutes of Health, 6701 Rockledge Drive, Room 5116, MSC 7854, Bethesda, MD 20892, (301) 435-1171,                         *rosenl@csr.nih.gov.*

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.306, Comparative Medicine; 93.333, Clinical Research, 93.306, 93.333, 93.337, 93.393-93.396, 93.837-93.844, 93.846-93.878, 93.892, 93.893, National Institutes of Health, HHS)

Dated: April 7, 2011.

Jennifer S. Spaeth,

Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.

[FR Doc. 2011-8927 Filed 4-12-11; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4140-01-P