alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

DAY ELEV

 220.49

 220.10

 221.01

 221.19

 220.67

 220.45

 220.01

 220.67

 221.45

 221.94

 223.38

 223.96

 223.33

 222.64

 222.12

 220.86

 220.87

 221.49

 222.19

 222.52

 221.90

 221.29

 218.92

 218.80

 218.58

 218.64

 219.55

 220.29

 44,427

 43,411

 45,787

 46,259

 44,897

 44,322

 43,178

 44,897

 46,941

 48,229

 52,062

 53,619

 51,928

 50,086

 48,703

 45,394

 45,420

 47,046

 48,889

 49,767

 48,124

 46,521

 40,381

 40,077

 39,523

 39,674

 41,990

 43,905

STORAGE

-287

-1,016

+2,376

+472

-1,362

-575

-1,144

+1,719

+2,044

+1,288

+3,833

+1,557

-1,691

-1,842

-1,383

-3,309

+26

+1,626

+1,843

+878

-1,643

-1,603

-6,140

-304

-554

+151

+2,316

+1,915

CHANGE

89

0

0

0

0

0

0

247

566

590

1,335

1,820

1,868

2,008

2,046

2,109

2,081

2,043

1,938

1,285

891

876

394

0

0

102

565

917

PUMPING

 1,061

 858

 533

 725

 511

 281

 513

 512

 623

 0

 0

 213

 521

 646

 757

 635

 732

 626

 350

 802

 985

 957

 1,187

 500

 593

 631

 733

 582

PUMPING

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 1,286

 4,617

 6,290

 5,308

 4,409

 5,876

 4,694

 2,494

 2,430

 791

 1,543

 1,360

 2,422

 0

 0

 0

 0

 15

PUMPING

 230

 100

 123

 229

 269

 254

 115

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

GEN.

*

-76

-632

+780

+118

+93

+245

+51

+59

-25

+8

+38

+29

+249

+8

+172

+186

+157

-272

+64

-336

+83

-46

+119

+37

+34

+28

-38

+120

OR

UNITED STATES 

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION

CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT

CONSOLIDATED STATE-FEDERAL O'NEILL FOREBAY August 12, 2014

DAILY OPERATIONS

FEBRUARY 2014 RUN DATE:

IN LAKE GEN.

ACRE-FEET O'NEILL

RELEASE - C.F.S. 

TOTALS -809 23,770 1,320 43,535 17,067 +1,253

ACRE-FEET -809 47,148 2,618 86,352 33,852

SUMMARY

 94

RELEASE (ACRE-FEET)

O'NEILL GEN. 2,618

SAN LUIS PUMP 86,352 94

 44,714

DOS AMIGOS PUMP 33,852

DELIVERIES 

S. LUIS O'NEILL

 1,080

 1,077

 1,073

 1,073

 0

 0

 0

 1,072

 1,067

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 1,110

 0

 7,552

 14,979

CALIF. DOS AMIGOS

AQUEDUCT

53

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

45

51

1,845

3,766

3,842

3,010

2,252

2,548

3,200

2,168

1,708

1,087

725

679

0

310

280

577

263

526

 28,935

 57,393

S. LUIS

DELIV.

GAINS(+)

LOSS(-)

C.F.S.

INFLOW - C.F.S.

STATE OF CALIFORNIA

THE RESOURCES AGENCY

DEPARTMENT OF WATER RESOURCES

STATE WATER PROJECT

TOTAL 122,916

 2,485

* DAILY DEL. FIGURES UNAVAILABLE. TOT. DEL. IS INCLUDED IN COMPUTING MONTHLY TOTALS 

Table 18
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY

 57,880

 58,031

 58,300

 58,548

 58,641

 58,201

 58,116

 58,149

 58,157

 58,242

 58,377

 58,201

 58,015

 57,941

 57,856

 57,747

 57,763

 57,812

 57,876

 58,088

 58,181

 58,255

 58,446

 58,446

 58,434

 58,320

 58,308

 58,381

 58,434

 58,430

 58,312

 82,260

 82,757

 83,478

 84,391

 85,105

 84,439

 83,397

 83,147

 83,282

 83,390

 83,735

 83,714

 82,925

 82,333

 82,051

 84,971

 81,783

 80,708

 80,515

 80,788

 81,121

 81,375

 81,723

 81,890

 81,830

 81,516

 81,369

 81,362

 81,429

 81,502

 81,402

STORAGE - A.F. 

 140,140

 140,788

 141,778

 142,939

 143,746

 142,640

 141,513

 141,296

 141,439

 141,632

 142,112

 141,915

 140,940

 140,274

 139,907

 142,718

 139,546

 138,520

 138,391

 138,876

 139,302

 139,630

 140,169

 140,336

 140,264

 139,836

 139,677

 139,743

 139,863

 139,932

 139,714

5,668

6,463

7,386

8,706

9,726

9,720

7,582

6,753

7,041

7,153

7,811

8,471

7,066

5,864

5,381

5,200

5,086

5,666

5,403

5,606

6,670

7,137

7,672

8,096

8,266

7,678

6,882

6,673

6,813

7,230

8,001

5,971

6,790

7,885

9,291

10,133

9,162

7,014

6,644

7,113

7,250

8,053

8,372

6,574

5,528

5,196

6,617

3,487

5,149

5,338

5,851

6,885

7,302

7,944

8,180

8,230

7,462

6,802

6,706

6,873

7,265

7,891

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

MAY 2017 FULL NATURAL FLOW AT NEW MELONES DAM RUN DATE: 06/05/2017

TOTALS +175 218,958

* October 1, 434,303

 1,864.9

 1,878.4

 1,894.0

 1,912.4

 1,932.5

 1,950.7

 1,964.6

 1,977.8

 1,991.9

 2,006.3

 2,022.2

 2,038.9

 2,051.9

 2,062.9

 2,073.2

 2,086.3

 2,093.2

 2,103.4

 2,114.0

 2,125.6

 2,139.3

 2,153.7

 2,169.5

 2,185.7

 2,202.1

 2,216.9

 2,230.3

 2,243.6

 2,257.3

 2,271.7

 2,287.3

DONNELLS

RES

BEARDSLEY

RES

2016 TO DATE

NEW

MELONES

INFLOW

C.F.S

NATURAL

RIVER

C.F.S

ACCUM *

FULL

NATURAL

1000 A.F.

RESERVOIR

TOTAL

+601

+648

+990

+1,161

+807

-1,106

-1,127

-217

+143

+193

+480

-197

-975

-666

-367

+2,811

-3,172

-1,026

-129

+485

+426

+328

+539

+167

-72

-428

-159

+66

+120

+69

-218

CHANGE

A.F. C.F.S.

+303

+327

+499

+585

+407

-558

-568

-109

+72

+97

+242

-99

-492

-336

-185

+1,417

-1,599

-517

-65

+245

+215

+165

+272

+84

-36

-216

-80

+33

+60

+35

-110
### **CHAPTER 29—INTERNATIONAL STUDIES AND RESEARCH**
#### § 6.41 General.

Subject to the exceptions listed in subpart D, the act by an industry member of furnishing, giving, renting, lending, or selling any equipment, fixtures, signs, supplies, money, services, or other things of value to a retailer constitutes a means to induce within the meaning of the Act.

[T.D. ATF-364, 60 FR 20421, Apr. 26, 1995]
### §7355a. Supplement, not supplant

Funds made available under subpart 1 or subpart 2 of this part shall be used to supplement, and not supplant, any other Federal, State, or local education funds.

(Pub. L. 89–10, title V, §5232, formerly title VI, §6232, as added Pub. L. 107–110, title VI, §601, Jan. 8, 2002, 115 Stat. 1897; renumbered title V, §5232, Pub. L. 114–95, title V, §5001(a)(5), Dec. 10, 2015, 129 Stat. 2039, 2040.)
Bench

Display

Pond

L a k e

B o w d o i n

D r y L a k e U n i t

Long 

Island Farm Ponds

Teal Ponds
Exhibit 99.8




                       GE CAPITAL MORTGAGE SERVICES, INC.
             OFFICERS' ANNUAL COMPLIANCE CERTIFICATE - SERIES 1997-8


         The undersigned,  Vice Presidents of GE Capital Mortgage Services, Inc.
(the "Servicer"), pursuant to the Pooling and Servicing Agreement for the Series
1997-8 REMIC Multi-Class  Mortgage  Pass-Through  Certificates (the "Agreement")
entered into by GE Capital Mortgage Services,  Inc., as Seller and Servicer, and
State Street Bank and Trust Company,  as Trustee,  which  Agreement  requires an
annual  statement of  compliance  to be made to the Trustee by an officer of the
Servicer, hereby state that:

     (i)  a review  of the  activities  of the  Servicer  during  the  preceding
          calendar year and of its performance under the Agreement has been made
          under the undersigned officers' supervision; and

     (ii) to the  best of the  undersigned  officers'  knowledge,  based on such
          review,  the Servicer has  fulfilled  all of its material  obligations
          under  the  Agreement  throughout  such  year,  except as set forth on
          Exhibit A hereto.

Capitalized  terms used  herein but not  defined  herein  shall have the meaning
given to them in the Agreement.


Dated:            March 25, 1998




By:      /s/ Gregory A. Gibson
------------------------------
         Gregory A. Gibson
         Vice President


By:      /s/ Karen Pickett
--------------------------
         Karen Pickett
         Vice President



<PAGE>



                                    EXHIBIT A


         Flood Insurance.  There may be instances in which mortgage loans in the
CompanyOs   servicing  portfolio  which  did  not  require  flood  insurance  at
origination  were  subsequently  included  within  special flood hazard areas as
designated by the Federal  Emergency  Management  Agency and flood  insurance on
such mortgage loans may not yet be in place. The Company,  however, has arranged
for back-up flood insurance  coverage in the event of a flood loss relating to a
mortgaged  property  located in a special  flood  hazard  area.  The  Company is
continuing  a  remapping  effort  which  will  identify  mortgage  loans  in its
servicing  portfolio  which  may  now be (but  which  were  not at  origination)
included in special flood hazard  areas.  The Company is not aware of any losses
associated with the lack of flood insurance coverage on such mortgage loans.
JAMAL CHE GLENN , Appellant, v. STATE OF FLORIDA , Appellee

. IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA
NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED
CASE NO. 1D 14

- 5235

___________ __________________/ Opinion filed October 4, 2016. An appeal from the Circuit Court for Duval County

. Tatiana Salvador , Judge

. Jamal Che Glenn, pro se , Appellant. Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, and Jennifer J. Moore, Assistant Attorney General, Ta llahassee , for Appellee.

PER CURIAM. Appellant challenges the trial court’s order summarily denying his Rule 3.850 motion and imposing sanctions for frivolous filings. Appellant pleaded guilty to murder and robbery on the advice of his counsel. He now claims that his counsel was (or should have been) aware of a scientific report supporting his claim of innocence. The trial court summarily dismissed the claim as untimely, noting Appellant filed his motion more than two years after his judgment and senten ce became final.2 Rule 3.850’s two

- year limitations period includes an exception for situations in which “the facts on which the claim is predicated were unknown to the movant or the movant’s attorney and could not have been ascertained by the exercise of d ue diligence.” In that instance, the deadline is two years from “the time the new facts were or could have been discovered with the exercise of due diligence.” Id. ; see also Vann v. State , 605 So. 2d 920, 921 (Fla. 1st DCA 1992) (finding exception applicab le when appellant learned of his counsel’s misadvice more than two years after appellant’s conviction became final). Because Appellant’s motion was filed within two years after A ppellant alleges he first could have discovered the pertinent facts, and becau se his motion otherwise is facially sufficient, we reverse and remand for the trial court to either attach records conclusively refuting Appellant’s claim or to conduct further proceedings under Rule 3.850. Because the trial court’s order imposing sanction s was based in part on its summary denial of Appellant’s 3.850 motion, we reverse the sanctions order as well. If the trial court later concludes that the 3.850 motion was baseless (even if facially sufficient), the court may consider whether to impose

san ctions again.
REVERSED AND REMANDED
OSTERHAUS , WINSOR, and M

. K . THOMAS , J J

. , CON CUR.
#### The People of the State of New York ex rel. City Bank Farmers Trust Company, as Trustee under a Supplemental Trust Agreement with Prudence-Bonds Corporation, Respondent, against Anthony J. Rizzardi, as Commissioner of Assessment and Taxation of the City of New Rochelle, et al., *911Appellants. (Consolidated Proceedings.)

—Motion for leave to appeal to the Court of Appeals denied. Present — Lewis, P. J., Carswell, Johnston, Adel and Wenzel, JJ. [See *ante,*p. 865.]
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO  18 U.S.C. §1350,  AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Kodiak Oil & Gas Corp. (the "Company") on Form 10-K for the period
ended December 31, 2008 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Keith Doss, Secretary, Treasurer and Chief Financial Officer, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



Date: March 12, 2009/s/ KEITH DOSS Keith Doss
Secretary, Treasurer and Chief Financial Officer


---



QuickLinks
§ 286.2 Fee for arrival of passengers aboard commercial aircraft or commercial vessels. ( a ) A fee, in the amount prescribed in section 286(d) of the Act, per individual is charged and collected by the Commissioner for the immigration inspection of each passenger aboard a commercial aircraft or commercial vessel, arriving at a port-of-entry in the United States, or for the preinspection of a passenger in a place outside the United States prior to such arrival, except as provided in § 286.3.
( b ) A fee, in the amount prescribed in section 286(e)(3) of the Act, per individual, is charged and collected by the Commissioner for the immigration inspection at a port-of-entry in the United States, or for the preinspection in a place outside the United States of each commercial vessel passenger whose journey originated in the United States, Canada, Mexico, territories or possessions of the United States, or adjacent islands, except as provided in § 286.3. All tickets or documents for transportation on voyages that are booked on or after February 27, 2003, will be subject to this immigration user fee.
( c ) Each commercial aircraft and vessel carrier or ticket-selling agent whose monthly collections in any month exceed $50,000 shall submit a summary statement showing the amount of user fees collected that month. The summary statement is due on the last business day of the following month. This information shall be forwarded to the Immigration and Naturalization Service, Chief, Analysis and Formulation Branch, 425 I Street, NW., Room 6307, Washington, DC 20536. For the months of December, March, June, and August, the quarterly remittance and statement required by § 286.5 will serve as the monthly report for those months. Therefore, a monthly report is required for all other months in which monthly collections exceed $50,000.
[59 FR 49348, Sept. 28, 1994, as amended at 63 FR 51272, Sept. 25, 1998; 67 FR 15334, Apr. 1, 2002; 68 FR 4092, Jan. 28, 2003]
(No. 73-CC-181

#### St. Therese Hospital, Claimant, *vs.*State of Illinois, Department of Mental Health, Respondent.

*Opinion filed June 7, 1973.*

St. Therese Hospital, Claimant, pro se.

William J. Scott, Attorney General; Saul R. Wexler, Assistant Attorney General, for Respondent.

Per Curiam.
### §§93, 94. Repealed. Oct. 31, 1951, ch. 654, §1(41), (42), 65 Stat. 703

Section 93, act Nov. 19, 1919, ch. 118, 41 Stat. 360, which related to sale of machine tools to trade, technical, and public schools and universities, had been transferred to section 1180a of former Title 10, Army and Air Force, and was later repealed by act Oct. 31, 1951.

Section 94, act May 26, 1928, ch. 760, 45 Stat. 753, which related to transfer of obsolete aeronautical equipment to museums, schools and colleges, had been transferred to section 1180b of former Title 10, Army and Air Force, was later repealed by act Oct. 31, 1951.
#### Martin Benitez MUNOZ; et al., Petitioners, v. Alberto R. GONZALES, Attorney General, Respondent.

No. 04-73758.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted Feb. 13, 2006.*

Decided Feb. 21, 2006.

Martin Benitez Munoz, pro se.

Leslie Jazmín Benitez-Najera, pro se.

CAC-District Counsel, Esq., Office of the District Counsel Department of Homeland Security, Los Angeles, CA, Ronald E. LeFevre, Chief Counsel, Office of the District Counsel Department of Homeland Security, San Francisco, CA, Anh-Thu P. Mai, Esq., U.S. Department of Justice Civil Div./Offiee of Immigration Lit., Washington, DC, for Respondent.

Before: FERNANDEZ, RYMER, and BYBEE, Circuit Judges.

*

 The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

MEMORANDUM **

Martin Benitez Munoz, a native and citizen of Mexico, petitions pro se for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) decision affirming an immigration judge’s order denying Munoz’s application for cancellation of removal because of his two convictions for petty theft under CahPenal Code § 488 in 1993 and 1995. Because Munoz was found to be removable for entry without inspection and not due to his criminal record, we have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252. *See Toro-Romero v. Ashcroft,*382 F.3d 930, 934 (9th Cir. 2004). We review for abuse of discretion the BIA’s factual findings and review de novo conclusions of law. *Thomas v. Gonzales,*409 F.3d 1177, 1182 (9th Cir.2005) *209(en banc). We deny the petition for review.

The BIA properly determined that Munoz was twice convicted of petty theft, because Munoz’s 1995 petty theft conviction record indicates that he was also convicted of petty theft in 1993. *See Penuliar v. Ashcroft,*395 F.3d 1037, 1040 (9th Cir. 2005). Munoz’s contention that the conviction records for his 1993 offense were destroyed by the State of California and so could not be introduced into evidence is unavailing. Because petty theft is a crime of moral turpitude, *see Cuevas-Gaspar v. Gonzales,*430 F.3d 1013, 1020 (9th Cir. 2005), Munoz is not eligible for cancellation of removal, *see*8 U.S.C. § 1229b(b)(l)(c).

All remaining contentions are also unpersuasive.

The voluntary departure period was stayed, and that stay will expire upon issuance of the mandate. *See Desta v. Ashcroft,*365 F.3d 741, 750 (9th Cir.2004).

PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED

**

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
#### In the Matter of Leon Weinberg, Respondent. William F. Canough, as Commissioner of Assessment of City of Syracuse, Appellant. (Review of 1940 Assessment of 156 James Street, Syracuse.)

*816Present — Crosby, P. J., Cunningham, Taylor, Dowling and McCurn, JJ.
## In the

Court of Appeals

Second Appellate District of Texas

at Fort Worth

No. 02

- 17

- 00361

- CR

B ENJAMIN M ARTINEZ

, Appellant

V

.

T HE S TATE OF T EXAS §

§

§

§

§ On Appeal from the 372nd District

Court

of Tarrant Co unty (1484319D)

April 11, 2019

Opinion by Chief Justice Sudderth

(nfp)

JUDGMENT

This court has considered the record on appeal in this case and holds that there

was no error in the trial court’s judgment. It is ordered that the judgment of the trial

court is affirmed.

SECOND DISTRICT COURT OF APPEALS

By

_ /s/ Bonnie Sudderth

_________________ Chief Justice Bonnie Suddert h
Editorial Note on Part 478
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 478 appear by T.D. ATF-411, 64 FR 17291, Apr. 9, 1999, T.D. ATF-487, 68 FR 3750, Jan. 24, 2003, and ATF-11F, 73 FR 57240, Oct. 2, 2008.

§ 478.98 Sales or deliveries of destructive devices and certain firearms. The sale or delivery by a licensee of any destructive device, machine gun, short-barreled shotgun, or short-barreled rifle, to any person other than another licensee who is licensed under this part to deal in such device or firearm, is prohibited unless the person to receive such device or firearm furnishes to the licensee a sworn statement setting forth ( a ) The reasons why there is a reasonable necessity for such person to purchase or otherwise acquire the device or weapon; and
( b ) That such person's receipt or possession of the device or weapon would be consistent with public safety. Such sworn statement shall be made on the application to transfer and register the firearm required by Part 479 of this chapter. The sale or delivery of the device or weapon shall not be made until the application for transfer is approved by the Director and returned to the licensee (transferor) as provided in Part 479 of this chapter.
[T.D. ATF-270, 53 FR 10497, Mar. 31, 1988]
§ 7.233 Mandatory statements. ( a ) *Responsible advertiser.* The advertisement must display the responsible advertiser's name, city, and State or the name and other contact information (such as, telephone number, website, or email address) where the responsible advertiser may be contacted.
( b ) *Class.* The advertisement shall contain a conspicuous statement of the class to which the product belongs, corresponding to the statement of class which is required to appear on the label of the product.
( c ) *Exception.* ( 1 ) If an advertisement refers to a general malt beverage line or all of the malt beverage products of one company, whether by the company name or by the brand name common to all the malt beverages in the line, the only mandatory information necessary is the responsible advertiser's name, city, and State or the name and other contact information (such as telephone number, website, or email address) where the responsible advertiser may be contacted. This exception does not apply where only one type of malt beverage is marketed under the specific brand name advertised.
( 2 ) On consumer specialty items, the only information necessary is the company name or brand name of the product.
### §192. Omitted

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section, act Mar. 4, 1927, ch. 505, §2, 44 Stat. 1422, authorized appropriation of $300,000 to be expended for acquisition of land specified in section 191 of this title.
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 12.3


                                      PACCAR Inc

                  COMPUTATION OF RATIO OF EARNINGS TO FIXED CHARGES
                        PURSUANT TO SEC REPORTING REQUIREMENTS
                                (Thousands of Dollars)
   
   
                                                 Three Months Ended
                                                       March 31

                                                  1997          1996
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

   
FIXED CHARGES
  Interest expense
    PACCAR Inc and subsidiaries (1)           $  35,318        $32,809
Portion of rentals deemed interest                1,526          1,471
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

   TOTAL FIXED CHARGES                        $  36,844        $34,280
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

EARNINGS
  Income before taxes -
    PACCAR Inc and subsidiaries               $  88,690        $55,891
Fixed charges                                    36,844         34,280
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
   
EARNINGS AS DEFINED                           $ 125,534        $90,171
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

RATIO OF EARNINGS TO FIXED CHARGES                3.41X          2.63X
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

(1) Exclusive of interest, if any, paid to PACCAR Inc


                                          -12-