alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation

*Notice is hereby given*                     that the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (“FDIC”) as Receiver for Oaktree Federal Savings, New Orleans, Louisiana and for Oaktree Savings Bank, SSB (“Receiver”) intends to terminate its receiverships for said institutions. The Resolution Trust Corporation (“RTC”) was appointed Receiver for Oaktree Federal Savings and Oaktree Savings Bank, SSB and pursuant to 12 U.S.C. 1441a(m)(1) FDIC succeeded RTC as Receiver. The liquidation of receivership assets has been completed. To the extent permitted by available funds and in accordance with law, the Receiver will be making a final dividend payment to proven creditors.                

                    Based on the foregoing, the Receiver has determined that the continued existence of the receiverships will serve no useful purpose. Consequently, notice is given that the receiverships shall be terminated, to be effective no sooner                           ( print page 21367)                        than thirty days after the date of this Notice. If any person wishes to comment concerning the termination of the receivership, such comment must be made in writing and sent within thirty days of the date of this Notice to: Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation,                     *Attention:*                     Receivership Oversight Department 8.1, 1601 Bryan Street, Dallas, Texas 75201.                

No comments concerning the termination of these receiverships will be considered which are not sent within this time frame.

Dated: April 11, 2011.

Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation.

Robert E. Feldman,

Executive Secretary.

[FR Doc. 2011-9127 Filed 4-14-11; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6714-01-P
<PAGE>



                                                                      Exhibit 16



                                                             Arthur Andersen LLP
                                                     1345 Avenue of the Americas
                                                         New York, NY 10105-0032
                                                                www.andersen.com


April 10, 2002

Office of the Chief Accountant
Securities and Exchange Commission
450 Fifth Street, N.W. Washington, D.C. 20549
Dear Sir or Madam:

We have read the first paragraph of Item 4 included in the Form 8-K/A dated
April 10, 2002 of Atalanta Sosnoff Capital Corporation filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission and are in agreement with the statements contained
herein.

Very truly yours,

/s/ Arthur Andersen LLP
-----------------------
Arthur Andersen LLP


                                       43
###### Editorial Note on Part 555

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 555 appear by T.D. ATF-487, 68 FR 3748, Jan. 24, 2003.

#### § 555.82 Rules of practice in license and permit proceedings.

Regulations governing the procedure and practice for disapproval of applications for explosives licenses and permits and for the denial of renewal or revocation of such licenses and permits under the Act are contained in part 771 of this chapter.

[ATF 33F, 84 FR 64744, Nov. 25, 2019]
### SUBCHAPTER III—FEDERAL AND STATE COOPERATION
A-AA+Skip to content

                  - Home
                  - Compendium Statistics
                  - Event
                  - Archives
                  - Glossary
                  - Help
                  - Contact
                  - Research on Disability

Annual Disability Statistics Compendium

              - Home /
              - Archives /
              - 2012 Compendium Statistics /
              - 2012 Employment /
              - 2012 2.3 Civilians with Hearing Disabilities Ages 18-64 Living in the Community for the U.S.

## Table 2.3: Employment—Civilians with Hearing Disabilities Ages 18 to 64 Years Living in the Community for the United States and States: 2011

----

----

 

----

#### 2012 Disability Compendium

                        - Home
                        - Compendium Statistics                           - Population and Prevelance
                          - Employment
                          - Time Trend Population Statistics
                          - Poverty
                          - Earnings
                          - Veterans
                          - Health Insurance Coverage
                          - Health
                          - Social Security Administration Programs
                          - Medicaid and Medicare
                          - Special Education
                          - Vocational Rehabilitation
                          - Federal Government Spending and Employment
                          - International Disability Statistics
                          - Population Statistics: Disability Type
                        - Event
                        - Archives                           - 2012 Compendium Statistics
                        - Glossary
                        - Help
                        - Contact
                        - Research on Disability

#### Funding for this project is made possible by:

 The Research and Training Center on Disability Statistics and Demographics (StatsRRTC), which is funded by the U.S. Department of Education, National Institute for Disability and Rehabilitation Research, under cooperative agreements H133B080012.

#### Stay Connected

**Institute on Disability**10 West Edge Drive, Suite 101Durham, NH 03824603.862.4320 | relay: 711 | [email protected]www.iod.unh.edu

© 2013. Institute on Disability.University of New Hampshire.
#### § 10.808 Does the fee schedule apply to every kind of procedure?

Where the time, effort and skill required to perform a particular procedure vary widely from one occasion to the next, the Director may choose not to assign a relative value to that procedure. In this case the allowable charge for the procedure will be set individually based on consideration of a detailed medical report and other evidence. At its discretion, OWCP may set fees without regard to schedule limits for specially authorized consultant examinations, for examinations performed under 5 U.S.C. 8123, and for other specially authorized services.
### §§8141 to 8143. Repealed. Pub. L. 107–110, title X, §1011(5)(A), Jan. 8, 2002, 115 Stat. 1986

Section 8141, Pub. L. 89–10, title X, §10601, as added Pub. L. 103–382, title I, §101, Oct. 20, 1994, 108 Stat. 3838, related to instruction on history and principles of democracy in the United States.

Section 8142, Pub. L. 89–10, title X, §10602, as added Pub. L. 103–382, title I, §101, Oct. 20, 1994, 108 Stat. 3839, related to instruction in civics, government, and the law.

Section 8143, Pub. L. 89–10, title X, §10603, as added Pub. L. 103–382, title I, §101, Oct. 20, 1994, 108 Stat. 3840, related to report and authorization of appropriations.
### §51. Library

The Regents shall make, from the interest of the fund, an appropriation, not exceeding an average of $25,000 annually, for the gradual formation of a library composed of valuable works pertaining to all departments of human knowledge.

(R.S. §5587.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

R.S. §5587 derived from act Aug. 10, 1846, ch. 178, §8, 9 Stat. 105.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Public Use of Research and Study Facilities of Certain Institutions

Under provisions of R.S. §94 and act Mar. 3, 1875, ch. 179, 18 Stat. 512, the Joint Committee on the Library of Congress was authorized to extend the use of the Library to the Regents of the Smithsonian Institution. These provisions were not classified to the Code, being rendered superfluous by a general declaration of public policy by Congress, by a joint resolution adopted Apr. 12, 1892, 27 Stat. 395, to the effect that facilities for study and research in the Library of Congress, the National Museum, and similar institutions shall be afforded investigators, students, etc., in the several states and territories as well as in the District of Columbia.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY

 10,694

 10,595

 10,421

 10,306

 10,298

 10,460

 10,473

 10,530

 10,473

 10,371

 10,239

 10,129

 10,181

 10,213

 10,228

 10,220

 10,220

 10,270

 10,658

 10,961

 11,155

 11,310

 11,363

 11,305

 11,305

 11,220

 11,184

 11,290

 11,481

 11,481

 11,465

 38,548

 38,513

 38,554

 38,503

 38,369

 38,313

 38,191

 38,063

 38,027

 38,058

 38,043

 38,002

 37,778

 37,596

 37,509

 37,372

 37,240

 37,089

 37,089

 37,114

 37,013

 36,897

 36,816

 36,821

 36,786

 36,831

 36,831

 36,846

 36,907

 37,068

 37,388

STORAGE - A.F. 

 49,242

 49,108

 48,975

 48,809

 48,667

 48,773

 48,664

 48,593

 48,500

 48,429

 48,282

 48,131

 47,959

 47,809

 47,737

 47,592

 47,460

 47,359

 47,747

 48,075

 48,168

 48,207

 48,179

 48,126

 48,091

 48,051

 48,015

 48,136

 48,388

 48,549

 48,853

489

487

519

614

384

568

575

458

698

815

581

666

599

631

973

550

660

805

1,045

1,066

823

813

651

504

492

550

685

756

670

803

673

421

419

452

530

312

621

520

422

651

779

507

590

512

555

937

477

593

754

1,241

1,231

870

833

637

477

474

530

667

817

797

884

826

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

MARCH 2021 FULL NATURAL FLOW AT NEW MELONES DAM RUN DATE: 04/05/2021

TOTALS -524 20,336

* October 1,

40,336

 109.7

 110.5

 111.4

 112.5

 113.1

 114.3

 115.4

 116.2

 117.5

 119.0

 120.0

 121.2

 122.2

 123.3

 125.2

 126.1

 127.3

 128.8

 131.3

 133.7

 135.4

 137.1

 138.3

 139.3

 140.2

 141.3

 142.6

 144.2

 145.8

 147.6

 149.2

DONNELLS

RES

BEARDSLEY

RES

2020 TO DATE

NEW

MELONES

INFLOW

C.F.S

NATURAL

RIVER

C.F.S

ACCUM *

FULL

NATURAL

1000 A.F.

RESERVOIR

TOTAL

-135

-134

-133

-166

-142

+106

-109

-71

-93

-71

-147

-151

-172

-150

-72

-145

-132

-101

+388

+328

+93

+39

-28

-53

-35

-40

-36

+121

+252

+161

+304

CHANGE

A.F. C.F.S.

-68

-68

-67

-84

-72

+53

-55

-36

-47

-36

-74

-76

-87

-76

-36

-73

-67

-51

+196

+165

+47

+20

-14

-27

-18

-20

-18

+61

+127

+81

+153

ACRE-FEET
###### Editorial Note on Part 28

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 28 appear by T.D. ATF-477, 67 FR 18087 through 18090, Apr. 15, 2002.

#### § 28.321 Tax assessed on loss not accounted for.

The appropriate TTB officer shall make demand on the brewer for an amount equal to the tax which would be due on removal for consumption or sale, including penalties and interest, on; (a) The quantity of beer not satisfactorily accounted for, or (b) the quantity of beer used to produce the quantity of beer concentrate which is not satisfactorily accounted for.

(Sec. 201, Pub. L. 85-859, 72 Stat. 1333, as amended, 1334, as amended (26 U.S.C. 5051, 5053))

[T.D. ATF-224, 51 FR 7700, Mar. 5, 1986, as amended by T.D. TTB-8, 69 FR 3835, Jan. 27, 2004]
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 98-7231

ANDREW DAVID OWENS, Petitioner - Appellant, versus NORTH CAROLINA ATTORNEY GENERAL; STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA, Respondents - Appellees.Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina, at Durham. William L. Osteen, Sr., District Judge. (CA-97-1101-1) Submitted: January 21, 1999 Decided: February 9, 1999 Before LUTTIG, MOTZ, and KING, Circuit Judges. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Andrew David Owens, Appellant Pro Se. Clarence Joe DelForge, III, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF NORTH CAROLINA, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).* Although the district court’s judgment is marked as “filed” on July 27, 1998, the district court’s records show that it was entered on the docket sheet on July 28, 1998. Pursuant to Rules 58 and 79(a) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, it is the date that the judgment was entered on the docket sheet that we take as the effective date of the district court’s decision. See Wilson v. Murray, 806 F.2d 1232, 1234-35 (4th Cir. 1986). 2 PER CURIAM: Andrew David Owens seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying relief on his petition filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2254 (West 1994 & Supp. 1998). We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion accepting the recommendation of the magistratejudge and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. See Owens v. North Carolina Attorney Gen. , No. CA-97-1101-1 (M.D.N.C. July 28, 1998). * We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
COURT OF APPEALS

	SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS

	FORT WORTH

	NO.  2-05-159-CV

IN RE 

RAYMOND DOMONIC COZZI, JR.	

	------------

	ORIGINAL PROCEEDING

	------------

	MEMORANDUM OPINION1

	------------

	Relator, Raymond Domonic Cozzi Jr., filed a petition for writ of mandamus to compel Respondent, Honorable James R. Wilson, to conduct a hearing and rule on Relator’s motions to reduce bail pending appeal and petition for writ of habeas corpus for bail reduction pending appeal.  We deny Relator’s petition for two reasons.

	First, a party who complains about a trial court’s refusal to hear or rule on a motion must show that the matter was brought to the attention of the trial court and that the trial court failed or refused to rule.  In re Hearn, 137 S.W.3d 681, 685 (Tex. App.—San Antonio 2004, orig. proceeding); Barnes v. State, 832 S.W.2d 424, 426-27 (Tex. App.—Houston [1st Dist.] 1992, orig. proceeding).  Merely filing the matter with the district clerk is not sufficient to impute knowledge of the pending pleading to the trial court.  In re Hearn, 137 S.W.3d at 685; In re Chavez, 62 S.W.3d 225, 228 (Tex. App.—Amarillo 2001, orig. proceeding).  The record shows that Relator filed his motions and petition for writ of habeas corpus with the Tarrant County District Clerk.  Nothing in the record suggests that he brought his motions and petition to the trial court’s attention.

	Second, mandamus will not issue where there is an adequate remedy by appeal.  Walker v. Packer, 827 S.W.2d 833, 840 (Tex. 1992).  Article 44.04(g) of the code of criminal procedure provides a right of appeal to the court of appeals for review of any judgment or order concerning an appeal bond.  Tex. Code Crim. Proc. Ann. art. 44.04(g) (Vernon Supp. 2004-05).  Relator had an adequate remedy by appeal, and mandamus will not issue.

	For these reasons, we deny Relator’s petition for writ of mandamus.

							PER CURIAM

PANEL B:	GARDNER, HOLMAN, and MCCOY, JJ.

DELIVERED:  June 9, 2005
478 P.2d 559

#### STATE ex rel. Jeanniene SCHMITT, Petitioner, v. The DISTRICT COURT OF the SECOND JUDICIAL DISTRICT sitting WITHIN AND FOR the COUNTY OF BERNALILLO, D. A. MacPherson, Jr., Judge, Division IV, Respondent.

No. 9184.

Supreme Court of New Mexico.

Jan. 6, 1971.

Original Prohibition Proceeding

Ordered that the alternative writ of prohibition heretofore issued in this cause on December 22, 1970, be and the same is hereby quashed.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

DAY ELEV

 222.96

 222.75

 223.29

 223.76

 222.31

 221.36

 222.18

 223.28

 223.55

 222.64

 222.64

 221.81

 221.26

 222.58

 221.96

 223.04

 223.11

 222.45

 221.90

 221.07

 221.11

 220.46

 221.47

 221.56

 221.56

 221.59

 220.70

 221.04

 220.93

 220.83

 50,939

 50,379

 51,821

 53,081

 49,208

 46,705

 48,863

 51,794

 52,518

 50,086

 50,086

 47,887

 46,442

 49,926

 48,282

 51,153

 51,340

 49,580

 48,124

 45,944

 46,049

 44,348

 46,994

 47,230

 47,230

 47,309

 44,975

 45,865

 45,577

 45,315

STORAGE

-1,498

-560

+1,442

+1,260

-3,873

-2,503

+2,158

+2,931

+724

-2,432

+0

-2,199

-1,445

+3,484

-1,644

+2,871

+187

-1,760

-1,456

-2,180

+105

-1,701

+2,646

+236

+0

+79

-2,334

+890

-288

-262

CHANGE

740

1,355

983

845

903

1,038

1,104

1,087

874

697

802

778

784

804

853

811

653

539

574

174

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

PUMPING

 1,269

 1,342

 1,548

 1,549

 1,716

 1,577

 430

 1,313

 484

 656

 529

 1,739

 1,402

 1,786

 1,936

 1,965

 1,612

 1,907

 1,979

 1,762

 630

 883

 683

 420

 885

 1,439

 953

 663

 0

 674

PUMPING

 2,808

 1,333

 1,067

 923

 2,073

 1,564

 520

 0

 527

 2,131

 1,023

 1,025

 792

 0

 506

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 22

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

PUMPING

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 61

 312

 77

 62

 0

 92

 268

 388

 318

 244

 283

 500

GEN.

*

-26

+98

+38

-15

+15

-17

-4

-81

-15

+72

+2

+92

+104

+8

+172

+32

+51

+83

+104

+100

-40

+5

+166

-39

-11

-105

+95

-101

+34

+157

OR

UNITED STATES 

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION

CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT

CONSOLIDATED STATE-FEDERAL O'NEILL FOREBAY October 21, 2015

DAILY OPERATIONS

SEPTEMBER 2015 RUN DATE:

IN LAKE GEN.

ACRE-FEET O'NEILL

RELEASE - C.F.S. 

TOTALS -7,122 16,398 2,605 16,314 35,731 +974

ACRE-FEET -7,122 32,525 5,167 32,359 70,872

SUMMARY

 264

RELEASE (ACRE-FEET)

O'NEILL GEN. 5,167

SAN LUIS PUMP 32,359 264

 52,437

DOS AMIGOS PUMP 70,872

DELIVERIES 

S. LUIS O'NEILL

 0

 0

 1,442

 1,420

 0

 0

 0

 944

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 2,189

 0

 2,181

 600

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 1,679

 483

 956

 1,956

 0

 1,425

 0

 960

 16,235

 32,202

CALIF. DOS AMIGOS

AQUEDUCT

2,608

939

879

857

918

858

937

840

518

793

749

785

577

542

588

388

402

398

628

699

801

83

171

186

230

16

0

33

104

58

 17,585

 34,880

S. LUIS

DELIV.

GAINS(+)

LOSS(-)

C.F.S.

INFLOW - C.F.S.

STATE OF CALIFORNIA

THE RESOURCES AGENCY

DEPARTMENT OF WATER RESOURCES

STATE WATER PROJECT

TOTAL 108,662

 1,932

* DAILY DEL. FIGURES UNAVAILABLE. TOT. DEL. IS INCLUDED IN COMPUTING MONTHLY TOTALS 

Table 18
---

Exhibit 99.8

March 31, 2017

CONSENT OF NEIL BURNS

United States Securities and Exchange Commission

In connection with the filing of the Annual Report on Form 40-F
of Silver Wheaton Corp. for the year ended December 31, 2016 (the Annual
Report), I, Neil Burns, M.Sc., P.Geo., Vice President, Technical Services,
Silver Wheaton Corp., hereby consent to being named as having approved the
disclosure of the scientific and technical information contained in the Annual
Report under the headings Description of the Business, Technical
Information, Technical Information  Further Disclosure Regarding Mineral
Projects on Material Properties San Dimas Mines, Mexico,  Peñasquito Mine,
Mexico, - Salobo Mine, Brazil and Interest of Experts contained in the Annual
Information Form for the year ended December 31, 2016, included as Exhibit 99.1
to the Annual Report and incorporated by reference into the Companys
Registration Statement on Form S-8 (File No. 333-128128), Form F-10 (File No.
333-203682) and Form F-3D (File No. 333-194702). I hereby confirm that I have
read the Annual Report and have no reason to believe that there are any
misrepresentations in the information contained therein that is within my
knowledge as a result of the services performed by me in connection with my
approval of the disclosure of the scientific and technical information contained
in the Annual Report.

Yours truly,

/s/ Neil
BurnsNeil Burns, MSc, P.Geo Vice President Technical Services,
Silver Wheaton Corp.

---
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

DAY HIGH

 23,671

 23,066

 23,314

 23,558

 24,245

 24,745

 25,526

 24,580

 25,883

 26,713

 25,501

 25,692

 25,060

 25,432

 25,332

 25,072

 26,035

 25,973

 26,407

 27,688

 28,604

 28,348

 27,739

 26,981

 26,830

 25,420

 25,884

 25,082

 25,369

 22,308

 13,716

 14,323

 14,385

 15,082

 15,619

 15,079

 14,790

 14,380

 14,756

 14,662

 15,378

 14,767

 13,938

 13,603

 14,644

 15,421

 16,520

 17,804

 18,118

 18,631

 18,431

 17,722

 16,642

 15,473

 15,567

 14,322

 13,389

 13,548

 14,781

 14,553

 19,782

 19,531

 19,511

 19,741

 19,966

 20,022

 20,315

 20,013

 20,508

 21,397

 21,241

 20,934

 20,540

 20,934

 21,132

 21,553

 21,767

 21,950

 22,091

 22,797

 23,326

 23,377

 22,816

 22,272

 21,491

 20,640

 20,567

 20,414

 21,625

 18,793

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

NOVEMBER 2018 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: December 10, 2018

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

PORT CHICAGO BOTTOM IN SUISUN BAY
§ 1002.85 Must the employee give advance notice to the employer of his or her service in the uniformed services? ( a ) Yes. The employee, or an appropriate officer of the uniformed service in which his or her service is to be performed, must notify the employer that the employee intends to leave the employment position to perform service in the uniformed services, with certain exceptions described below. In cases in which an employee is employed by more than one employer, the employee, or an appropriate office of the uniformed service in which his or her service is to be performed, must notify each employer that the employee intends to leave the employment position to perform service in the uniformed services, with certain exceptions described below.
( b ) The Department of Defense USERRA regulations at 32 CFR 104.3 provide that an “appropriate officer” can give notice on the employee's behalf. An “appropriate officer” is a commissioned, warrant, or non-commissioned officer authorized to give such notice by the military service concerned.
( c ) The employee's notice to the employer may be either verbal or written. The notice may be informal and does not need to follow any particular format.
( d ) Although USERRA does not specify how far in advance notice must be given to the employer, an employee should provide notice as far in advance as is reasonable under the circumstances. In regulations promulgated by the Department of Defense under USERRA, 32 CFR 104.6(a)(2)(i)(B), the Defense Department “strongly recommends that advance notice to civilian employers be provided at least 30 days prior to departure for uniformed service when it is feasible to do so.”
HPMSVtypeID yearID HPMSBaseYearVMT baseYearOffNetVMT

10 2024 410260 0

20 2024 42076835 0

30 2024 28989395 0

40 2024 306965 0

50 2024 2944820 0

60 2024 9934205 0