alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Teda Travel Incorporated Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended September 30, 2004 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Godfrey Chin Tong Hui, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:



(1)

The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and



(2)

The information contained in the Report fairly presents in all material respects the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, another document authenticating, acknowledging or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to Teda Travel Incorporated and will be retained by Teda Travel Incorporated and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.





/s/ Godfrey Chin Tong Hui

Godfrey Chin Tong Hui

Chief Executive Officer

(Principal Executive Officer)
COURT OF APPEALS

EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

EL PASO, TEXAS

Linda S. Restrepo and Carlos E. Restrepo,

d/b/a Collectively RDI Global Services and

R & D International

,

Appellant s

,

v.

Alliance Riggers & Constructors, Ltd.

,

Appellee

. '

'

'

'

'

' No. 08

- 1 3

- 00 183

- CV

Appeal from the

County Court at Law No 5

of El Paso County, Texas

(TC# 2012DCV04523 )

O R D E R

On August 30, 2013, the Court issued an order directing Appellants to file with the Court a

reasonable explanation for failure to timely file the notice of appeal. Appellants have complied

and assert that they mistakenly believed their request for findings of fact and conclu sions of law

extended the deadline for filing the notice of appeal pursuant to T EX .R.A PP .P. 26.1. The Court

finds that this is a reasonable explanation for the Appellants’ failure to file the notice of appeal by

the due date. Accordingly, the Court finds that it has jurisdiction of the appeal.

IT IS SO ORDERED this 1 7 th day of September

, 201 3

.

PER CURIAM

Before McClure, C.J., Rivera and Rodriguez, JJ.

(Rivera, not participating)
HILLS BANCORPORATION
                                   EXHIBIT 11
                    COMPUTATION OF EARNINGS PER COMMON SHARE

                                                         Three months ended
                                                             March 31,
                                                        2000            1999
                                                      --------------------------

Weighted average number of shares
  outstanding (basic) ........................        1,495,941        1,470,322

Weighted average of potential
  dilutive shares attributable
  to stock options granted
  computed under the treasury
  stock method ...............................           12,585           24,516
                                                     ---------------------------
Weighted average number of shares
  (diluted) ..................................        1,508,526        1,494,838
                                                     ===========================


Earnings Per Share:
  Net income (in thousands) ..................       $    2,204       $    2,079
                                                     ===========================
  Earnings per common share:
    Basic ....................................       $     1.47       $     1.41
                                                     ===========================

    Diluted ..................................             1.46             1.39
                                                     ===========================
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

DAY

 63,510

 63,640

 63,703

 63,989

 64,140

 64,052

 64,140

 64,115

 63,695

 63,405

 63,607

 64,010

 64,132

 63,955

 64,149

 63,989

 64,115

 64,237

 64,149

 64,228

 64,262

 64,228

 64,182

 64,228

 64,342

 64,279

 64,262

 64,270

 64,262

 64,262

 97,155

 97,263

 97,492

 97,600

 97,378

 97,363

 97,291

 97,291

 97,234

 97,270

 97,270

 97,270

 97,471

 97,542

 97,414

 97,399

 97,349

 97,291

 97,342

 97,342

 97,499

 96,464

 97,464

 97,658

 97,643

 97,478

 97,499

 97,506

 97,550

 97,593

STORAGE - A.F. 

 160,665

 160,903

 161,195

 161,589

 161,518

 161,415

 161,431

 161,406

 160,929

 160,675

 160,877

 161,280

 161,603

 161,497

 161,563

 161,388

 161,464

 161,528

 161,491

 161,570

 161,761

 160,692

 161,646

 161,886

 161,985

 161,757

 161,761

 161,776

 161,812

 161,855

2,473

2,296

2,351

2,205

2,725

2,811

2,451

2,549

2,385

1,916

1,661

1,525

2,141

2,931

2,793

3,012

2,276

1,797

1,783

1,891

1,542

1,416

1,530

995

1,220

1,782

1,739

950

2,326

1,725

2,576

2,416

2,498

2,404

2,689

2,759

2,459

2,536

2,145

1,788

1,763

1,728

2,304

2,878

2,826

2,924

2,314

1,829

1,764

1,931

1,638

877

2,011

1,116

1,270

1,667

1,741

958

2,344

1,747

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

JUNE 2000 FULL NATURAL FLOW AT NEW MELONES DAM RUN DATE: 07/03/2000

TOTALS +1,395 61,900

* October 1, 122,779

 845.6

 850.4

 855.4

 860.2

 865.5

 871.0

 875.8

 880.9

 885.1

 888.7

 892.2

 895.6

 900.2

 905.9

 911.5

 917.3

 921.9

 925.5

 929.0

 932.8

 936.1

 937.8

 941.8

 944.0

 946.5

 949.8

 953.3

 955.2

 959.8

 963.3

DONNELLS

RES

BEARDSLEY

RES

1999 TO DATE

NEW

MELONES

INFLOW

C.F.S

NATURAL

RIVER

C.F.S

ACCUM *

FULL

NATURAL

1000 A.F.

RESERVOIR

TOTAL

+205

+238

+292

+394

-71

-103

+16

-25

-477

-254

+202

+403

+323

-106

+66

-175

+76

+64

-37

+79

+191

-1,069

+954

+240

+99

-228

+4

+15

+36

+43

CHANGE

A.F. C.F.S.

+103

+120

+147

+199

-36

-52

+8

-13

-240

-128

+102

+203

+163

-53

+33

-88

+38

+32

-19

+40

+96

-539

+481

+121

+50

-115

+2

+8

+18

+22
Exhibit 23.1
 Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
 /s/ McGladrey &
Pullen, LLPRaleigh, North CarolinaJune 27, 2011
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation

Pursuant to the provisions of the “Government in the Sunshine Act” (5 U.S.C. 552b), notice is hereby given that at 10:41 a.m. on Tuesday, April 12, 2011, the Board of Directors of the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation met in closed session to consider matters related to the Corporation's supervision, corporate and resolution activities.

In calling the meeting, the Board determined, on motion of Director John E. Bowman (Acting Director, Office of Thrift Supervision), seconded by Director John G. Walsh (Acting Comptroller of the Currency), concurred in by Vice Chairman Martin J. Gruenberg, Director Thomas J. Curry (Appointive), and Chairman Sheila C. Bair, that Corporation business required its consideration of the matters which were to be the subject of this meeting on less than seven days' notice to the public; that no earlier notice of the meeting was practicable; that the public interest did not require consideration of the matters in a meeting open to public observation; and that the matters could be considered in a closed meeting by authority of subsections (c)(2), (c)(4), (c)(6), (c)(8), (c)(9)(A)(ii), (c)(9)(B), and (c)(10) of the “Government in the Sunshine Act” (5 U.S.C. 552b(c)(2), (c)(4), (c)(6), (c)(8), (c)(9)(A)(ii), (c)(9)(B), and (c)(10)).

The meeting was held in the Board Room of the FDIC Building located at 550—17th Street, NW., Washington, DC.

Dated: April 12, 2011.

Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation.

Robert E. Feldman,

Executive Secretary.

[FR Doc. 2011-9180 Filed 4-12-11; 4:15 pm]

BILLING CODE P
Phenoxy Butyl Acrylate 

 

MW = 220.26
Exhibit 31.3



CERTIFICATION ACCOMPANYING PERIODIC REPORT

PURSUANT TO SECTION 302

OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



I, Thinh Q. Tran, Chairman of the Board, President and Chief Executive Officer, certify that:



|1. | I have reviewed this Annual Report on Form 10-K/A of Sigma Designs, Inc.; and
|-- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------



|2. | Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report.
|-- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                    |  |  |  |                                                                           
|------------------- |  |  |  | --------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                    |  |  |  | /s/ Thinh Q. Tran                                                         
|Dated: June 2, 2014 |  |  |  | Thinh Q. Tran
Chairman of the Board, President and Chief Executive Officer
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY HIGH

 469

 511

 525

 528

 526

 548

 534

 601

 566

 545

 491

 438

 465

 541

 528

 603

 542

 572

 581

 583

 611

 586

 572

 515

 541

 499

 550

 504

 570

 637

 602

 337

 334

 334

 334

 331

 326

 321

 318

 310

 302

 312

 304

 301

 291

 281

 269

 266

 253

 257

 261

 259

 259

 268

 271

 272

 273

 273

 272

 263

 255

 257

 370

 369

 371

 366

 365

 372

 370

 359

 367

 364

 352

 339

 344

 347

 331

 323

 314

 310

 315

 322

 331

 331

 335

 329

 335

 348

 346

 331

 329

 337

 330

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

JULY 2004 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: August 12, 2004

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

DELTA MENDOTA CANAL AT CHECK 13 (O'NEILL)
Exhibit 10.1


 





AGREEMENT


 


August 21, 2018


 


On 27 September 2012 a Settlement Agreement
and Release was signed between 1) Black Ridge Oil & Gas, Inc. ("Black Ridge"), 2) Peerless Media, Ltd ("Peerless"),
and 3) ElectraWorks, Ltd ("ElectraWorks"), (the "Settlement Agreement").


 


Following execution of the Settlement Agreement,
in November 2014 bwin.party digital entertainment plc group disposed of Peerless and as a result, ElectraWorks assumed full financial
responsibility for all payments under the Settlement Agreement.


 


Black Ridge and ElectraWorks have mutually
agreed that in exchange for the payment by wire from ElectraWorks to Black Ridge of the amount of Two Million Two Hundred Fifty
Thousand U.S. Dollars (US$2,250,000) (which ElectraWorks shall pay on or before August 31, 2018) that ElectraWorks and Peerless
shall owe no further payments to Black Ridge pursuant to Section 2 of the Settlement Agreement. This payment shall be made to the
bank account set forth on the attached Exhibit A.


 


All other terms of the Settlement Agreement shall remain in
full force and effect.


 


The signatories to this Agreement warrant
and represent that they have the right, power, and authority to bind the parties they represent.


 


 


AGREED AND ACKNOWLEDGED:


 





	BLACK RIDGE OIL & GAS, INC.	ELECTRAWORKS, LTD.
	 	 
	Signed: /s/ James A. Moe	Signed: /s/ Robert Hoskin
	By: James A. Moe	By: Robert Hoskin
	Its: Chief Financial Officer	Its: Director
**Exhibit32.1**

** **

**CERTIFICATIONPURSUANT TO**

**18U.S.C. SECTION 1350**

**ASADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906**

**OFTHE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

 

I, Marc D. Grodman, Chief Executive Officer ofBio-Reference Laboratories, Inc. (the “Company”), do hereby certify, pursuantto 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

(a)           the Annual Report onForm 10-K of the Company for the fiscal year ended October, 31 2003, which thiscertification accompanies (the “Periodic Report”), fully complies with therequirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

(b)           based on my knowledge,the information contained in the Periodic Report fairly presents, in allmaterial respects, the financial condition and results of operations of theCompany.

 

 

Dated: January 28, 2004

 

 
|   | /S/ Marc D. Grodman              |   |
|--------|----------------------------------|--------|
|   | Marc D. Grodman                  |
|   | Chief Executive Officer          |
|   | Bio-Reference Laboratories, Inc. |

 

1

----
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>

      THIS SCHEDULE  CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL  INFORMATION  EXTRACTED FROM THE
      CONSOLIDATED  STATEMENT OF INCOME FOR THE NINE MONTHS ENDED  SEPTEMBER 30,
      1999 AND THE  CONSOLIDATED  BALANCE SHEET FOR THE QUARTER ENDED SEPTEMBER,
      30, 1999 AND IS QUALIFIED  IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH  FINANCIAL
      STATEMENTS.

</LEGEND>

<S>                                            <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                  9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                                   SEP-30-1999
<CASH>                                           1,414,177
<SECURITIES>                                             0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   16,361,601
<ALLOWANCES>                                       187,211
<INVENTORY>                                     34,474,174
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                53,125,766
<PP&E>                                           2,542,554
<DEPRECIATION>                                   1,254,551
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 134,987,822
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           12,366,962
<BONDS>                                                  0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                    0
<PREFERRED>                                              0
<COMMON>                                             7,005
<OTHER-SE>                                      34,913,357
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   134,987,822
<SALES>                                         78,602,490
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                78,602,490
<CGS>                                           48,254,253
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   68,097,690
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 1,511,878
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                         0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               5,587,962
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  3,404,960
<INCOME-TAX>                                     1,484,581
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              1,920,379
<DISCONTINUED>                                           0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                  1,451,516
<CHANGES>                                                0
<NET-INCOME>                                       468,863
<EPS-BASIC>                                            .08
<EPS-DILUTED>                                          .08



</TABLE>
#### In the Matter of the Claim of Arthur Gross, Appellant, against Capitol Hat Block Co., Inc., et al., Respondents. State Industrial Board, Respondent.

*810All concur.
(No. 73-CC-289

#### Scientific Products Division of American Hospital Supply Corporation, Claimant, *vs.*State of Illinois, Environmental Protection Agency, Respondent.

*Opinion filed August 6, 1973.*

Scientific Products Division of American Hospital Supply Corporation, Claimant, pro se.

William J. Scott, Attorney General; Edward L. S. Arkema, Jr., Assistant Attorney General, for Respondent.

*38Per Curiam.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 20-1563

BRIAN JAMES HUFFSTICKLE,

 Plaintiff - Appellant,

and

MICHELLE DAWN HUFFSTICKLE,

 Plaintiff,

v.

21ST MORTGAGE,

 Defendant - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Rock 

Hill. Mary G. Lewis, District Judge. (0:19-cv-02523-MGL)

Submitted: December 17, 2020 Decided: March 3, 2021

Before KING, DIAZ, and RICHARDSON, Circuit Judges.

Vacated and remanded by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Brian James Huffstickle, Appellant Pro Se. Theodore Von Keller, CRAWFORD & VON 

KELLER, LLC, Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM: 

Brian and Michelle Huffstickle appeal the district court’s order adopting the 

magistrate judge’s recommendation to grant Defendant’s motion for summary judgment 

and dismiss their civil action. In its order, the court stated that the Huffstickles failed to 

object to the report and recommendation. On appeal, the Huffstickles claim that they never 

received the report and recommendation. 

A party who fails to timely object in writing to a magistrate judge’s proposed 

findings of fact and conclusions of law is not entitled to de novo review of the magistrate 

judge’s determinations by the district court and is barred from contesting those 

determinations on appeal. Wright v. Collins, 766 F.2d 841, 845-46 (4th Cir. 1985); see 28 

U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). However, the waiver of appellate rights for failing to object is a 

prudential rule, not a jurisdictional requirement. Thomas v. Arn, 474 U.S. 140, 154 (1985). 

And, when a litigant is proceeding pro se, he or she must be accorded fair notice of the 

consequences of failing to object before being barred from appellate review. Wright, 766 

F.2d at 846-47. 

From the present record, we cannot conclusively determine whether the Huffstickles

received a copy of the magistrate judge’s report and recommendation. Accordingly, we 

vacate the district court’s order and remand for the court to make this determination in the 

first instance. If the court finds the Huffstickles’ claim to be credible, it should provide 

them with a copy of the report and recommendation and accord them an opportunity to 

object. If, however, the court finds that they received the report and recommendation, it 

may reenter its original order, with any necessary modifications. 
3

We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are 

adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the 

decisional process. 

VACATED AND REMANDED
### Part A—Student Support and Academic Enrichment Grants

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Pub. L. 114–95, title IV, §4001(a)(5)(A), Dec. 10, 2015, 129 Stat. 1966, substituted "Student Support and Academic Enrichment Grants" for "Safe and Drug-Free Schools and Communities" in part heading.
EXHIBIT 32.1





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350



The undersigned, Albert G. Lowenthal, Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of Oppenheimer Holdings Inc. (the "Company"), hereby certifies that to his knowledge the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2010 of the Company filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof  (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company for the period specified.



Signed at New York, New York, this 2nd day of March, 2011.



/s/ Albert G. Lowenthal

Albert G. Lowenthal

Chairman and Chief Executive Officer
* Pursuant to Local Rule 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in Local Rule 47.5.4. IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

__________________ No. 94-20785 Summary Calendar

__________________ UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee,
versus JORGE HERNAN VALENCIA, Defendant-Appellant.

_______________________________________________________ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas

(H-93-CR-237-1)

_______________________________________________________ February 5, 1996 Before KING, SMITH, and BENAVIDES, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: * Jorge Hernan Valencia appeals the district court's finding that his relevant conduct properly included 79.07 kilograms of cocaine. Valencia also contests the district court's conversion of $1,007,611 to 67.17 kilograms of cocaine. We have reviewed the record and the briefs and perceive no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm Valencia's sentence. AFFIRMED.
128 STAT. 1918 PUBLIC LAW 113–182—SEPT. 29, 2014 

LEGISLATIVE HISTORY—H.R. 4323: 

HOUSE REPORTS: No. 113–404 (Comm. on the Judiciary). 

CONGRESSIONAL RECORD, Vol. 160 (2014): 

Apr. 7, considered and passed House. 

Sept. 18, considered and passed Senate. 

Æ 

Public Law 113–182 

113th Congress 

An Act 

To reauthorize programs authorized under the Debbie Smith Act of 2004, and 

for other purposes. 

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of 

the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Debbie Smith Reauthorization 

Act of 2014’’. 

SEC. 2. GENERAL REAUTHORIZATION. 

Section 2 of the DNA Analysis Backlog Elimination Act of 

2000 (42 U.S.C. 14135) is amended— 

(1) in subsection (c)(3)— 

(A) in subparagraph (B), by striking ‘‘2010 through 

2018’’ and inserting ‘‘2014 through 2019’’; and 

(B) in subparagraph (C), by striking ‘‘2018’’ and 

inserting ‘‘2019’’; and 

(2) in subsection (j), by striking ‘‘2009 through 2014’’ and 

inserting ‘‘2015 through 2019’’. 

SEC. 3. TRAINING AND EDUCATION. 

Section 303(b) of the DNA Sexual Assault Justice Act of 2004 

(42 U.S.C. 14136(b)) is amended by striking ‘‘2009 through 2014’’ 

and inserting ‘‘2015 through 2019’’. 

SEC. 4. SEXUAL ASSAULT FORENSIC EXAM GRANTS. 

Section 304(c) of the DNA Sexual Assault Justice Act of 2004 

(42 U.S.C. 14136a(c)) is amended by striking ‘‘2009 through 2014’’ 

and inserting ‘‘2015 through 2019’’. 

Approved September 29, 2014. 

42 USC 13701 

note. 

Debbie Smith 

Reauthorization 

Act of 2014. 

Sept. 29, 2014 

[H.R. 4323] 


srobinson on DSKB307YQ1PROD with PUBLIC LAWS