alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**EXHIBIT 12.3**

 

**PACCAR and Subsidiaries**

 

**COMPUTATION OF RATIO OF EARNINGS TO FIXED CHARGES**

 

**PURSUANT TO SEC REPORTING REQUIREMENTS**

(Millions of Dollars)

 
| ** **                                         | ** ** | **Nine Months Ended  September 30** | ** **  |
|----------------------------------------------------|------------|-------------------------------------|-------------|
| ** **                                         | ** ** | **2004**                            | ** **  | **2003** | ** ** |
| ** **                                         | ** ** | ** **                          |        |   |   |
| FIXED CHARGES                                      |       |                                |        |   |   |
| Interest expense - PACCAR and Subsidiaries  (1)    | ** ** | **$**                               | **96.7**    |   | $ | 103.2 |   |
| Portion of rentals deemed interest                 | ** ** | **9.6**                             |        | 9.5 |   |
|                                               |       |                                |        |   |   |
| TOTAL FIXED CHARGES                                | ** ** | **$**                               | **106.3**   |   | $ | 112.7 |   |
|                                               |       |                                |        |   |   |
| EARNINGS                                           |       |                                |        |   |   |
| Income before taxes - PACCAR and  Subsidiaries (2) | ** ** | **$**                               | **1,001.6** |   | $ | 565.7 |   |
| Fixed charges                                      | ** ** | **106.3**                           |        | 112.7 |   |
|                                               |       |                                |        |   |   |
| EARNINGS AS DEFINED                                | ** ** | **$**                               | **1,107.9** |   | $ | 678.4 |   |
|                                               |       |                                |        |   |   |
| RATIO OF EARNINGS TO FIXED CHARGES                 | ** ** | **10.42**                           | **x**       | 6.02 | x |

 

----

(1)          Exclusiveof interest, if any, paid to PACCAR.

 

(2)          Includesbefore-tax earnings of wholly-owned subsidiaries.

 

1

----
I 

116TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 5732 

To direct the Secretary of Defense and the Secretary of Veterans Affairs 

to study the feasibility of establishing a pilot program to assign certain 

officers of the Armed Forces to serve as directors of medical centers 

of the Department of Veterans Affairs. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JANUARY 30, 2020 

Mr. MAST (for himself, Ms. GABBARD, Mr. ALLRED, and Mr. HIGGINS of 

Louisiana) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Veterans’ Affairs, and in addition to the Committee on Armed 

Services, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in 

each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned 

A BILL 

To direct the Secretary of Defense and the Secretary of 

Veterans Affairs to study the feasibility of establishing 

a pilot program to assign certain officers of the Armed 

Forces to serve as directors of medical centers of the 

Department of Veterans Affairs. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 


jbell on DSKJLSW7X2PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 5732 IH

1 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

2 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Leadership Evaluation 

3 At Department of Veterans Affairs Act’’ or the ‘‘LEAD 

4 VA Act’’. 

5 SEC. 2. FEASIBILITY STUDY ON PILOT PROGRAM FOR CER6 TAIN OFFICERS OF THE ARMED FORCES TO 

7 SERVE AS DIRECTORS OF DEPARTMENT OF 

8 VETERANS AFFAIRS MEDICAL CENTERS. 

9 (a) STUDY.—The Secretary of Defense and the Sec10 retary of Veterans Affairs shall jointly conduct a study 

11 to determine the feasibility of establishing a pilot program 

12 under which the Secretaries assign officers of the Armed 

13 Forces in the grade of O–6 to serve as directors of medical 

14 centers of the Department of Veterans Affairs for a period 

15 of three years. 

16 (b) REPORT.—Not later than 120 days after the date 

17 of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense and 

18 the Secretary of Veterans Affairs shall jointly submit to 

19 the Committees on Armed Services of the House of Rep20 resentatives and the Senate and the Committees on Vet21 erans Affairs of the House of Representatives and the 

22 Senate a report containing— 

23 (1) the results of the study under subsection 

24 (a); 

25 (2) a recommendation as to whether the pilot 

26 program should be established; and 


jbell on DSKJLSW7X2PROD with BILLS
3 

•HR 5732 IH

1 (3) if the establishment of the pilot program is 

2 recommended, a plan for such establishment. 

Æ 


jbell on DSKJLSW7X2PROD with BILLS
Exhibit 99.4

                       GE CAPITAL MORTGAGE SERVICES, INC.
             OFFICERS' ANNUAL COMPLIANCE CERTIFICATE - SERIES 1999-4

         The undersigned,  Vice Presidents of GE Capital Mortgage Services, Inc.
(the "Servicer"), pursuant to the Pooling and Servicing Agreement for the Series
1999-4 REMIC Multi-Class  Mortgage  Pass-Through  Certificates (the "Agreement")
entered into by GE Capital Mortgage Services,  Inc., as Seller and Servicer, and
State Street Bank and Trust Company,  as Trustee,  which  Agreement  requires an
annual  statement of  compliance  to be made to the Trustee by an officer of the
Servicer, hereby state that:

         (i)      a  review  of  the  activities  of  the  Servicer  during  the
                  preceding  calendar  year  and of its  performance  under  the
                  Agreement  has  been  made  under  the  undersigned  officers'
                  supervision; and

         (ii)     to the best of the undersigned  officers' knowledge,  based on
                  such review,  the Servicer has  fulfilled  all of its material
                  obligations  under the Agreement  throughout such year, except
                  as set forth on Exhibit A hereto.

Capitalized  terms used  herein but not  defined  herein  shall have the meaning
given to them in the Agreement.

Dated:            March 24, 2000

By:      /s/ Gregory A. Gibson
------------------------------
         Gregory A. Gibson
         Senior Vice President

By:      /s/ Tim Neer
------------------------------
         Tim Neer
         Vice President
<PAGE>

                                    EXHIBIT A





                                      None
### §§5897 to 5900. Repealed. Pub. L. 106–113, div. B, §1000(a)(4) [title III, §310(i)], Nov. 29, 1999, 113 Stat. 1535, 1501A–265

Section 5897, Pub. L. 103–227, title III, §317, Mar. 31, 1994, 108 Stat. 184; Pub. L. 103–382, title III, §361(d), Oct. 20, 1994, 108 Stat. 3975; Pub. L. 104–134, title I, §101(d) [title VII, §703(a)(16)], Apr. 26, 1996, 110 Stat. 1321–211, 1321–254; renumbered title I, Pub. L. 104–140, §1(a), May 2, 1996, 110 Stat. 1327, related to State planning for improving student achievement through integration of technology into curriculum.

Section 5898, Pub. L. 103–227, title III, §318, Mar. 31, 1994, 108 Stat. 186, related to prohibition on Federal mandates, direction, and control.

Section 5899, Pub. L. 103–227, title III, §319, Mar. 31, 1994, 108 Stat. 186, related to State and local government control of education.

Section 5900, Pub. L. 103–227, title III, §320, as added Pub. L. 104–134, title I, §101(d) [title VII, §706], Apr. 26, 1996, 110 Stat. 1321–211, 1321–257; renumbered title I, Pub. L. 104–140, §1(a), May 2, 1996, 110 Stat. 1327, related to certain prohibited conditions to receiving assistance and to limitations on Government officials.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date of Repeal

Repeal effective Sept. 30, 2000, see section 1000(a)(4) [title III, §310(i)] of Pub. L. 106–113, set out as a note under section 5881 of this title.
Editorial Note on Part 53
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 53 appear by T.D. ATF-447, 66 FR 19088, Apr. 13, 2001.

§ 53.143 Special rules relating to further manufacture. ( a ) *Purchasing manufacturer to be treated as the manufacturer.* For purposes of Chapter 32 of the Code, a manufacturer or producer to whom an article is sold or resold tax free under section 4221(a)(1) of the Code for use by it in further manufacture shall be treated as the manufacturer or producer of such article. If a manufacturer who purchases an article tax free for further manufacture does not use the article for further manufacture, the sale of the article by it, or its use of the article other than in further manufacture, shall, for purposes of the taxes imposed by chapter 32 of the Code, be treated as a sale or use of the article by the manufacturer thereof. See paragraphs (b) and (c) of this section for determination of taxable sale price where an article purchased tax free for further manufacture is resold, or used other than in further manufacture.
( b ) *Computation of tax.* Except as provided in paragraph (c) of this section, the tax liability referred to in paragraph (a) of this section shall be based on the price for which the article was sold by the purchasing manufacturer, or, where the manufacturer uses the article for a purpose other than that for which it was purchased, the tax shall be based on the price at which such or similar articles are sold, in the ordinary course of trade, by manufacturers, producers, or importers thereof. See section 4218(e) of the Code and § 53.115.
( c ) *Election.* ( 1 ) Instead of computing the tax as described under paragraph (b) of this section, the purchasing manufacturer who has incurred liability for tax on its sale or use of an article as provided by paragraph (a) of this section may compute the tax incurred under chapter 32 of the Code by using as the tax base either the price for which the article was sold to it by the first purchaser, if any, or the price for which such article was sold by the actual manufacturer, producer, or importer of such article. The purchasing manufacturer must have in its possession information upon which to substantiate such basis for tax. For purposes of this paragraph, the price for which the article was sold by the actual manufacturer or by the first purchaser shall be determined as provided in section 4216 of the Code and §§ 53.91-53.102. However, such price shall not be adjusted for any discount, rebate, allowance, return, or repossession of a container or covering, or otherwise.
( 2 ) The election under this paragraph shall be in the form of a statement attached to the return reporting the tax applicable to the sale or use of the article which gave rise to such tax liability. Such election, once made, may not be revoked.
|  |  | [if !vml]>[endif]>

You have  reached the Federal Depository Library Program Electronic Collection  (FDLP/EC) Archive. This archive assures ongoing access to publications in the  FDLP/EC. Access to publications in the archive is available through GPO's  suite of cataloging and locator services, including the Catalog of U.S.  Government Publications (CGP).
Title: Trade      agreements, labor standards and economic development [electronic      resource
 
 
SuDocs Number: [if !vml]>[endif]>L 29.2:T 67/3

Item    Number: [if !vml]>[endif]> [if !vml]>[endif]>0745-A-01    (online)
System    Number: 000854596
 
 
 
Volume    1.
 
Volume    2.
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
A service of the Superintendent of Documents,  U.S. Government Printing Office..

 

Last updated:  April 23, 2020  Page Name:  http://permanent.access.gpo.gov/
perm |
|--|--|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
### §§451 to 459. Repealed. June 17, 1930, ch. 497, title IV, §651(a)(1), 46 Stat. 762, eff. June 18, 1930

Sections, act Sept. 21, 1922, ch. 356, title IV, §§551–559, 42 Stat. 975–977, related to carriers of bonded merchandise, transportation restrictions, bonds, regulations, and abandonment of merchandise in bonded warehouses.

The following table shows the classification of former sections to the present similar provisions in the Tariff Act of 1930, as incorporated in this title.

| Former section | Present section |
| --- | --- |
| 451 | 1551 |
| 452 | 1552 |
| 453 | 1553 |
| 454 | 1554 |
| 455 | 1555 |
| 456 | 1556 |
| 457 | 1557 |
| 458 | 1558 |
| 459 | 1559 |

section
Circuit Court for Anne Arundel County

Case No. 02

- K

- 14

- 0 01387

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS

OF MARYLAND

No. 72

September Term, 201 9

JOSEPH PATRICK SOULE

v.

STATE OF MARYLAND

Barbera, C.J.

McDonald

Watts

Hotten

Getty

Booth

Biran

,

JJ.

PER CURIAM ORDER

Filed: March 2, 2020JOSEPH PATRICK SOULE * IN THE

* COURT OF APPEALS

v. * OF MARYLAND

* No. 72

STATE OF MARYLAND * September Term, 201 9



### PER CURIAM ORDER

The Court having considered and granted the petition for a writ of certiorari in the

above

- entitled case, it is this 2nd day of March. 2020

,

ORDERED, by the Court of Appeals of Maryland, that the judgment of the Court

of Special Appeals is vacated and the case is remanded to that Court to consider whether

or not the holding in Kazadi v. State , No. 11 (September Term, 2019) as revised on March

2, 2020 should be applied in this case and, if so, to reconsider its prior opinion

. Costs to

be paid by Petitioner.

/s/ Mary E l len Barbera

Chief Judge
(No. 6712

#### Streeter Amet, Division of Mangood Corporation, Claimant, *vs.*State of Illinois, Department of Conservation, Respondent.

*Opinion filed July 27, 1972.*

Streeter Amet, Division of Mangood Corporation, Claimant, pro se.

William J. Scott, Attorney General; Saul R. Wexler, Assistant Attorney General, for Respondent.

Perlin, C.J.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

DAY ELEV

 218.80

 219.40

 220.00

 219.93

 219.29

 221.22

 222.12

 220.50

 221.41

 221.45

 219.84

 220.02

 220.99

 221.55

 219.89

 221.74

 220.76

 220.80

 220.00

 220.10

 220.90

 220.58

 222.51

 220.82

 220.59

 220.37

 221.50

 222.44

 220.38

 221.61

 40,077

 41,605

 43,152

 42,971

 41,323

 46,338

 48,703

 44,453

 46,836

 46,941

 42,738

 43,204

 45,734

 47,204

 42,867

 47,703

 45,132

 45,237

 43,152

 43,411

 45,498

 44,661

 49,740

 45,289

 44,688

 44,114

 47,073

 49,554

 44,140

 47,362

STORAGE

-228

+1,528

+1,547

-181

-1,648

+5,015

+2,365

-4,250

+2,383

+105

-4,203

+466

+2,530

+1,470

-4,337

+4,836

-2,571

+105

-2,085

+259

+2,087

-837

+5,079

-4,451

-601

-574

+2,959

+2,481

-5,414

+3,222

CHANGE

1,418

1,340

1,282

1,224

1,213

1,205

1,198

1,196

1,058

988

816

599

485

485

715

761

525

478

173

275

406

401

718

861

575

521

528

524

546

551

PUMPING

 8,916

 7,602

 8,137

 7,780

 8,653

 8,936

 8,411

 9,309

 7,625

 8,012

 8,586

 8,630

 9,190

 9,242

 9,822

 8,239

 9,961

 10,323

 11,564

 10,759

 10,746

 11,017

 10,076

 9,578

 9,802

 9,903

 9,681

 9,299

 10,617

 8,718

PUMPING

 0

 0

 0

 3,351

 3,978

 0

 542

 0

 633

 1,451

 4,401

 1,419

 722

 2,354

 0

 1,906

 1,983

 1,669

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 1,124

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

PUMPING

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 115

 197

 77

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 160

 236

 301

 319

 333

GEN.

*

+468

+173

-119

+245

+226

+123

+99

-73

+151

+178

+362

+402

+182

+285

+227

+93

+7

+754

+313

+288

+450

+105

+261

+325

+83

-40

+281

+289

+764

+1,294

OR

UNITED STATES 

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION

CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT

CONSOLIDATED STATE-FEDERAL O'NEILL FOREBAY July 17, 2003

DAILY OPERATIONS

JUNE 2003 RUN DATE:

IN LAKE GEN.

ACRE-FEET O'NEILL

RELEASE - C.F.S. 

TOTALS +7,057 23,065 1,738 25,533 279,134 +8,196

ACRE-FEET +7,057 45,749 3,447 50,645 553,662

SUMMARY

 2,032

RELEASE (ACRE-FEET)

O'NEILL GEN. 3,447

SAN LUIS PUMP 50,645 2,032

 40,305

DOS AMIGOS PUMP 553,662

DELIVERIES 

S. LUIS O'NEILL

 1,025

 712

 2,211

 3,651

 4,340

 4,253

 2,925

 0

 2,726

 2,263

 3,785

 4,047

 5,210

 6,481

 1,403

 6,191

 4,457

 4,959

 4,873

 4,570

 5,082

 4,198

 5,697

 1,601

 5,340

 6,715

 7,525

 7,379

 3,082

 4,235

 120,936

 239,877

CALIF. DOS AMIGOS

AQUEDUCT

5,891

6,148

5,543

5,920

6,022

5,884

5,924

6,042

5,524

6,086

5,905

5,236

5,311

5,086

5,291

5,539

5,774

6,051

5,230

5,756

5,860

5,891

5,961

5,671

3,501

2,578

3,075

2,658

3,814

5,620

 158,792

 314,964

S. LUIS

DELIV.

GAINS(+)

LOSS(-)

C.F.S.

INFLOW - C.F.S

STATE OF CALIFORNIA

THE RESOURCES AGENCY

DEPARTMENT OF WATER RESOURCES

STATE WATER PROJECT

TOTAL 609,786

 16,257

* DAILY DEL. FIGURES UNAVAILABLE. TOT. DEL. IS INCLUDED IN COMPUTING MONTHLY TOTALS 

Table 18
###### Editorial Note on Part 41

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 41 (formerly part 275) appear at T.D. ATF-460, 66 FR 39093, July 27, 2001.

#### § 41.165 Action by taxpayer.

Where tobacco products and cigarette papers and tubes which have been imported or brought into the United States are lost (otherwise than by theft) or destroyed, by fire, casualty, or act of God, and the taxpayer desires to file claim for refund of the tax on such articles, he shall, in addition to complying with the requirements of § 41.163, indicate on the claim the nature, date, place, and extent of such loss or destruction. The claim shall be accompanied by such evidence as is necessary to establish to the satisfaction of the appropriate TTB officer that the claim is valid.

(72 Stat. 1419, as amended; 26 U.S.C. 5705)

[T.D. 6871, 31 FR 46, Jan. 4, 1966. Redesignated at 40 FR 16835, Apr. 15, 1975, and amended by T.D. ATF-232, 51 FR 28086, Aug. 5, 1986; T.D. ATF-243, 51 FR 43194, Dec. 1, 1986. Redesignated and amended by T.D. TTB-16, 69 FR 52424, 52425, Aug. 26, 2004]
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY ELEV

 123.12

 123.89

 123.23

 122.82

 122.68

 123.25

 122.88

 123.96

 123.64

 123.69

 123.23

 123.53

 123.46

 123.00

 123.22

 122.99

 123.07

 124.31

 124.43

 124.30

 124.10

 124.53

 123.44

 123.38

 123.56

 123.01

 124.31

 123.50

 123.34

 122.70

 123.24

 7,847

 8,209

 7,899

 7,710

 7,647

 7,909

 7,737

 8,242

 8,092

 8,115

 7,899

 8,040

 8,007

 7,791

 7,894

 7,787

 7,824

 8,416

 8,476

 8,411

 8,311

 8,526

 7,998

 7,970

 8,054

 7,796

 8,416

 8,026

 7,951

 7,656

 7,904

STORAGE

-123

+362

-310

-189

-63

+262

-172

+505

-150

+23

-216

+141

-33

-216

+103

-107

+37

+592

+60

-65

-100

+215

-528

-28

+84

-258

+620

-390

-75

-295

+248

CHANGE

3,479

3,750

3,396

3,449

3,508

3,587

2,962

3,304

2,970

3,056

2,944

3,123

3,032

2,937

3,094

2,998

3,074

3,351

3,070

3,013

3,001

3,191

2,783

3,034

3,091

2,910

3,418

2,854

2,550

2,155

3,178

INFLOW

 3,415

 3,442

 3,430

 3,420

 3,415

 3,326

 2,919

 2,920

 2,917

 2,915

 2,923

 2,923

 2,922

 2,918

 2,913

 2,922

 2,926

 2,924

 2,914

 2,922

 2,926

 2,957

 2,923

 2,921

 2,926

 2,917

 2,982

 2,928

 2,465

 2,181

 2,927

POWER

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 2

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

SPILL

 60

 60

 60

 60

 60

 60

 60

 60

 60

 60

 60

 60

 60

 60

 60

 60

 60

 60

 60

 60

 60

 60

 60

 60

 60

 60

 60

 60

 60

 60

 60

HATCHERY

 6

 5

 2

 4

 4

 4

 5

 4

 4

 4

 5

 4

 2

 3

 4

 3

 4

 4

 4

 4

 5

 6

 6

 7

 3

 3

 3

 3

 3

 3

 3

C.F.S.

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

AUGUST 2006 LAKE NATOMA DAILY OPERATIONS RUN DATE: December 19, 2006

IN LAKE

EVAP

C.F.S.

COMPUTED*

ACRE-FEET

RELEASE - C.F.S.

TOTALS -66 96,262 92,379 2 1,860 124

ACRE-FEET -66 190,936 183,234 4 3,689 246

COMMENTS:

* COMPUTED INFLOW IS THE SUM OF CHANGE IN STORAGE, RELEASES AND EVAPORATION.

SUMMARY

RELEASES (ACRE-FEET)

POWER 183,234

SPILL 4

FOLSOM SOUTH CANAL

HATCHERY

 3,830

 3,689

 7,970

FOLSOM

SOUTH 

 60

 60

 60

 60

 61

 65

 65

 65

 65

 65

 65

 65

 65

 65

 65

 65

 65

 65

 62

 60

 60

 60

 60

 60

 60

 60

 60

 60

 60

 60

 63

 1,931

 3,830

(1)

(1) INCHES OF EVAPORATION TAKEN FROM FOLSOM PAN.

RELEASES (ACRE-FEET) 

TOTAL 190,757

Table 12
###### Editorial Note on Part 40

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 40 appear by T.D. ATF-460, 66 FR 39094-39096, July 27, 2001; T.D. ATF-464, 66 FR 43479, Aug. 20, 2001; and T.D. TTB-91, 76 FR 5479, Feb. 1, 2011.

#### § 40.332 Suspension and revocation of permit.

Where the appropriate TTB officer has reason to believe that a manufacturer of tobacco products has not in good faith complied with the provisions of 26 U.S.C. chapter 52, and regulations thereunder, or with any other provision of 26 U.S.C. with intent to defraud, or has violated any condition of his permit, or has failed to disclose any material information required or made any material false statement in the application for the permit, or has failed to maintain his premises in such manner as to protect the revenue, or is, by reason of previous or current legal proceedings involving a felony violation of any other provision of Federal criminal law relating to tobacco products, processed tobacco, cigarette paper, or cigarette tubes, not likely to maintain operations in compliance with 26 U.S.C. chapter 52, or has been convicted of a felony violation of any provision of Federal or State criminal law relating to tobacco products, processed tobacco, cigarette paper, or cigarette tubes, the appropriate TTB officer shall issue an order, stating the facts charged, citing such person to show cause why his permit should not be suspended or revoked. Such citation shall be issued and opportunity for hearing afforded in accordance with part 71 of this chapter, which part is applicable to such proceedings. If, after hearing, the hearing examiner, or on appeal, the Administrator, finds that such person has not shown cause why his permit should not be suspended or revoked, such permit shall be suspended for such period as the appropriate TTB officer deems proper or shall be revoked.

(72 Stat 1421, as amended; 26 U.S.C. 5713)

[T.D. TTB-75, 74 FR 14483, Mar. 31, 2009]