alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
 Washington, D.C. 20549
 FORM 8-K
 CURRENT REPORT
Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
 June 27, 2011
 Date of Report (Date of earliest event reported)
 WEBMD HEALTH CORP.
  Delaware
    
    0-51547
    
    20-2783228(State or other jurisdiction of 
incorporation)
    
    (Commission File Number)
    
    (I.R.S. Employer Identification
No.)
 111 Eighth Avenue
New York, New York 10011
 (Address of principal executive offices, including zip code)
 (212) 624-3700
 (Registrants telephone number, including area code)
 (Former name or address, if changed since last report)
 see
 o
 o
 o
 o




---



##### 



Item 8.01. Other Events
  2




---



##### 



SIGNATURE
  WEBMD HEALTH CORP.Dated:   June 27, 2011
    By:
    /s/ Lewis H. LeicherLewis H. LeicherSenior Vice President 3
§ 9.180 Dundee Hills. ( a ) *Name.* The name of the viticultural area described in this section is “Dundee Hills”.
( b ) *Approved maps.* The appropriate maps for determining the boundaries of the Dundee Hills viticultural area are three United States Geological Survey (USGS) 1:24,000 scale maps. They are titled: ( 1 ) Dundee Quadrangle, Oregon, 1956, revised 1993;
( 2 ) Newberg Quadrangle, Oregon, 1961, photorevised 1985; and
( 3 ) Dayton Quadrangle, Oregon, 1957, revised 1992.
( c ) *Boundary.* The Dundee Hills viticultural area is located in Yamhill County, Oregon, near the town of Newberg, and is entirely within the Willamette Valley viticultural area. The boundary of the Dundee Hills viticultural area is as described below: ( 1 ) The beginning point is on the Dundee map at the intersection of the 200-foot contour line with Kuehne Road at the common boundary line of sections 47 and 48, T3S, R3W;
( 2 ) From the beginning point, proceed east then south along the meandering 200-foot contour line, crossing over to and back off the Newberg map, and then cutting diagonally southwest through the town of Dundee to the 200-foot contour line's intersection with Hess Creek, section 34, T3S, R3W (Dundee Quadrangle); then
( 3 ) Proceed south, then west, and then northeast, along the meandering 200-foot contour line, twice crossing over to and back off the Dayton map, to the contour line's intersection with Abbey Road after the line passes a quarry and crosses the two forks of Millican Creek in section 52, T3S, R3W (Dundee Quadrangle); then
( 4 ) Proceed generally north on Abbey Road to Kuehne Road and then follow Kuehne Road northeasterly to the beginning point.
[T.D. TTB-18, 69 FR 69527, Nov. 30, 2004]
1 

### Vetter, Cheryl

From: Vetter, Cheryl

Sent: Tuesday, August 11, 2015 12:48 PM

To: 'Szabo, Aaron'

Cc: Rao, Raj; Long, Pam

Subject: EO12866 Source Determination 2060-AS06 NPRM PreambleRule 20150811

Attachments: EO12866_Source Determination_2060-AS06_NPRM_PreambleRule_20150811.docx

Aaron

–

Attached is the final draft of the Source Determination rule. This includes the changes I sent you previously in response

to interagency comments, as well as some additional edits we have made to get the regulatory text into the proper

format for publication in the Federal Register, and some chang es to the pub lic hearing information.

Please let me know if you have any questions.

Thanks.
###### Editorial Note on Part 478

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 478 appear by T.D. ATF-411, 64 FR 17291, Apr. 9, 1999, T.D. ATF-487, 68 FR 3750, Jan. 24, 2003, and ATF-11F, 73 FR 57240, Oct. 2, 2008.

#### § 478.58 State or other law.

A license issued under this part confers no right or privilege to conduct business or activity contrary to State or other law. The holder of such a license is not by reason of the rights and privileges granted by that license immune from punishment for operating a firearm or ammunition business or activity in violation of the provisions of any State or other law. Similarly, compliance with the provisions of any State or other law affords no immunity under Federal law or regulations.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY ELEV

 861.92

 862.10

 861.94

 861.83

 861.72

 861.61

 861.50

 861.36

 861.17

 861.16

 861.28

 861.40

 861.53

 861.74

 861.98

 862.23

 862.44

 862.60

 862.80

 862.94

 862.62

 862.56

 862.63

 862.35

 862.03

 861.74

 861.18

 860.80

 860.57

 860.60

 860.44

 520.4

 521.3

 520.5

 520.0

 519.4

 518.9

 518.4

 517.7

 516.8

 516.8

 517.3

 517.9

 518.5

 519.5

 520.7

 521.9

 522.9

 523.7

 524.6

 525.3

 523.8

 523.5

 523.8

 522.5

 520.9

 519.5

 516.9

 515.0

 514.0

 514.1

 513.3

STORAGE

+0.7

+0.9

-0.8

-0.5

-0.5

-0.5

-0.5

-0.7

-0.9

+0.0

+0.6

+0.6

+0.6

+1.0

+1.1

+1.2

+1.0

+0.8

+1.0

+0.7

-1.5

-0.3

+0.3

-1.3

-1.5

-1.4

-2.7

-1.8

-1.1

+0.1

-0.8

CHANGE

378

499

535

497

491

590

612

592

570

562

563

591

575

635

649

657

632

608

623

437

89

180

242

252

326

179

272

224

317

325

451

INFLOW

 13

 17

 865

 720

 705

 796

 831

 881

 969

 541

 229

 232

 222

 83

 34

 23

 95

 199

 108

 64

 845

 288

 39

 901

 1,070

 873

 1,606

 1,117

 848

 231

 799

POWER

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

SPILL

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

OUTLET

 28

 47

 57

 42

 51

 59

 46

 48

 59

 45

 45

 70

 40

 46

 37

 29

 28

 22

 31

 34

 19

 37

 33

 30

 31

 5

 15

 20

 20

 22

 35

C.F.S.

 .18

 .30

 .37

 .27

 .33

 .38

 .30

 .31

 .38

 .29

 .29

 .45

 .26

 .30

 .24

 .19

 .18

 .14

 .20

 .22

 .12

 .24

 .21

 .19

 .20

 .03

 .10

 .13

 .13

 .14

 .23

INCHES

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .01

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .44

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

PRECIP

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

OCTOBER 2014 NEW MELONES LAKE DAILY OPERATIONS RUN DATE: November 7, 2014

IN LAKE

EVAPORATION

INCHES

C.F.S.

COMPUTED*

1000 ACRE-FEET

RELEASE - C.F.S.

TOTALS -6.2 14,153 16,244 0 0 1,131 7.30 .45

ACRE-FEET -6,200 28,072 32,220 0 0 2,243

COMMENTS:

* COMPUTED INFLOW IS THE SUM OF CHANGE IN STORAGE, RELEASES AND EVAPORATION.

SUMMARY

RELEASE (ACRE-FEET)

POWER 32,220

SPILL 0

OUTLET

TOTAL

 0

 32,220

PRECIPITATION

THIS MONTH =

TO DATE =

 .45

JULY 1, 2014 .97

 519.7

Table 13
###### Editorial Note on Part 40

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 40 appear by T.D. ATF-460, 66 FR 39094-39096, July 27, 2001; T.D. ATF-464, 66 FR 43479, Aug. 20, 2001; and T.D. TTB-91, 76 FR 5479, Feb. 1, 2011.

#### § 40.534 Power of attorney.

If the application for permit or any report or other document required to be executed under this subpart is to be signed by an individual (including one of the partners for a partnership or one of the members of an association) as an attorney in fact for any person, or if an individual is to otherwise officially represent such person, power of attorney on TTB F 5000.8 shall be furnished to the appropriate TTB officer. Such power of attorney is not required for persons whose authority is furnished with the corporate documents as required by § 40.494. TTB F 5000.8 does not have to be filed again with the appropriate TTB officer where such form has previously been submitted to that appropriate TTB officer and is still in effect.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY HIGH

 16,421

 16,257

 17,487

 18,569

 18,536

 18,965

 18,297

 16,969

 17,070

 16,161

 15,037

 15,536

 16,734

 18,774

 19,470

 20,787

 20,793

 20,683

 21,405

 22,084

 22,971

 21,929

 20,968

 20,837

 20,248

 20,482

 20,014

 20,368

 21,696

 23,335

 23,370

 7,933

 7,210

 8,291

 8,341

 7,981

 8,602

 7,898

 8,143

 7,946

 8,201

 8,362

 8,336

 8,434

 10,066

 10,305

 10,385

 11,465

 9,162

 10,033

 9,819

 10,228

 10,447

 10,607

 10,953

 10,953

 11,479

 11,559

 11,227

 11,392

 11,195

 10,771

 11,676

 12,065

 12,988

 13,396

 13,268

 13,671

 12,795

 12,615

 12,743

 12,538

 12,169

 12,220

 12,143

 14,016

 14,722

 15,385

 16,146

 15,270

 16,029

 16,349

 16,762

 15,627

 15,650

 15,965

 15,860

 15,302

 14,745

 14,838

 16,488

 17,006

 16,865

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

JULY 2001 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: August 7, 2001

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

PORT CHICAGO BOTTOM IN SUISUN BAY
### §954a. Access to the arts through support of education

#### (a) Purposes

The purposes of this section are—

(1) to increase accessibility to the arts through providing education to all Americans, including diverse cultures, urban and rural populations by encouraging and developing quality education in the arts at all levels, in conjunction with programs of nonformal education for all age groups, with formal systems of elementary, secondary, and postsecondary education;

(2) to develop and stimulate research to teach quality education in the arts; and

(3) to encourage and facilitate the work of artists, arts institutions, and Federal, State, regional, and local agencies in the area of education in the arts.

#### (b) Program of contracts or grants

The Chairperson of the National Endowment for the Arts,1 is authorized to establish and carry out a program of contracts with, or grants to, any State or other public agency, individual, artist, any nonprofit society, performing and nonperforming arts and educational institution or organization, association, or museum in the United States, in order to foster and encourage exceptional talent, public knowledge, understanding, and appreciation of the arts, and to support the education, training, and development of this Nation's artists, through such activities as projects that will—

(1) promote and improve the availability of arts instruction for American youth and life-long learning in the arts;

(2) enhance the quality of arts instruction in programs of teacher education;

(3) develop arts faculty resources and talents;

(4) support and encourage the development of improved curriculum materials in the arts;

(5) improve evaluation and assessment of education in the arts programs and instruction;

(6) foster cooperative programs with the Department of Education and encourage partnerships between arts and education agencies at State and local levels, arts organizations, business colleges and universities;

(7) support apprenticeships, internships, and other career oriented work-study experiences for artists and arts teachers, and encourage residencies of artists at all educational levels;

(8) support the use of technology and improved facilities and resources in education in the arts programs at all levels; and

(9) foster the development of demonstration projects, demonstration productions, demonstration workshops, and demonstration programs in arts education and collect, and make available to the public, information on their implementation and effectiveness.

#### (c) Advisory council on arts education

In order to provide advice and counsel concerning arts education, the Chairperson shall appoint an advisory council on arts education.

(Pub. L. 89–209, §5A, as added Pub. L. 101–512, title III, §318 [title I, §105], Nov. 5, 1990, 104 Stat. 1960, 1967.)

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date

Section effective Oct. 1, 1990, see section 318 [title IV, §403(a)] of Pub. L. 101–512, set out as an Effective Date of 1990 Amendment note under section 951 of this title.

1 So in original. The comma probably should not appear.
### §5984. Definitions

For purposes of this subchapter—

(1) the term "eligible entity" means a State educational agency, an institution of higher education or a State higher education agency, or a public or private nonprofit organization, with experience in coordinating or conducting teacher training seminars in American government and civics education, or a consortium thereof; and

(2) the term "State higher education agency" means the officer or agency primarily responsible for the State supervision of higher education.

(Pub. L. 103–227, title VIII, §804, Mar. 31, 1994, 108 Stat. 210.)
June 30, 2011

MEMORANDUM

From: William H. Maxwell

EPA/SPPD/ESG (D243-01)

To: Docket Number EPA-HQ-OAR-2009-0234

Subject: Teleconference with Sunflower Electric

Attendees:

Richard Taylor, UA

Jerry O’Leary, UA

Richard Hilton, Alstom

Clare A. Gustin, Sunflower Electric

Earl Watkins, Sunflower Electric

Wayne Penrod, Sunflower Electric

Ralph Roberson, RMB Consulting (consultant to Sunflower Electric)

Dana Stephens, Tri-State Generation and Transmission

Joe Goffman, EPA/OAR

Peter Tsirigotis, EPA/OAR/OAQPS/SPPD

Kirsten King, EPA/OAR

Discussion:

A general discussion of the Mercury and Air Toxics Standards was held.
### subpart 3—fees relating to devices
### §1140f. Purpose

It is the purpose of this subpart to support model demonstration programs that promote the successful transition of students with intellectual disabilities into higher education.

(Pub. L. 89–329, title VII, §766, as added Pub. L. 110–315, title VII, §709(2), Aug. 14, 2008, 122 Stat. 3365.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Prior Provisions

A prior section 766 of Pub. L. 89–329 was classified to section 1132d–5 of this title, prior to the general amendment of this subchapter by Pub. L. 96–374.
§ 212.6 Board's determination for use of military service. ( a ) Military service may be creditable under both the Railroad Retirement and Social Security Acts, but there are provisions under those Acts to prevent duplicate use of the service. The Railroad Retirement Board will determine whether an employee's military service should be used as railroad service or as Social Security service. The Board's determination is intended to be to the employee's advantage; however, if the employee does not agree with the Board's determination for use of the employee's military service, the employee may request that it be changed.
( b ) Generally, it is to the employee's advantage for the employee's military service to be creditable as railroad service where any of the following conditions may be met with the use of the employee's military service as railroad service: ( 1 ) It gives the employee 10 years of service (120 months), which is the minimum needed to qualify for an annuity based on age and service or total disability, as provided for in part 216, subpart B; or
( 2 ) It gives the employee 20 years of service (240 months), which is the minimum needed to qualify for an occupational disability annuity, as provided for in § 216.6 of this chapter; or
( 3 ) It gives the employee 25 years of service (300 months), which is the minimum needed to qualify for a supplemental annuity, as provided for in part 216, subpart C; or
( 4 ) It gives the employee 30 years of service (360 months), which would allow the employee to retire at age 60 with a full annuity and will also provide a full annuity to a qualified spouse at age 60, as provided for in part 216, subparts B and D; or
( 5 ) It gives the employee sufficient railroad service to entitle the employee to vested dual benefit payments, as provided for in part 216, subpart H.
( c ) In certain cases it may be to the employee's advantage for the employee's military service to be credited under the Social Security Act. This is generally true under the following conditions: ( 1 ) Crediting the military service under the Social Security Act would entitle the employee and any eligible children to social security benefits, since direct benefits are not payable to children of retired employees under the Railroad Retirement Act; or
( 2 ) Crediting the military service under the Social Security Act would entitle employee to vested dual benefit payments.
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent

except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 99-50053

Summary Calendar

 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

ARTURO DOMINGUEZ-BAEZA,

Defendant-Appellant.

--------------------

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Western District of Texas

USDC No. EP-98-CR-763-ALL-DB

--------------------

September 8, 1999

Before POLITZ, SMITH, and WIENER, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Arturo Dominguez-Baeza (Dominguez) appeals his jury

conviction for importation of marijuana and possession with

intent to distribute marijuana. Dominguez argues that the

district court’s denial of his challenges for cause during jury

selection and his subsequent motion for new trial (based upon the

same ground) deprived him of his right to an impartial jury and

his right to exercise his peremptory challenges intelligently. 

We have reviewed the record and the briefs of the parties 
No. 99-50053

-2-

and conclude that the district court did not abuse its discretion

by overruling Dominguez’s challenges of Raul Mendoza, Irma Pier,

Eva Ponce, Andy Saucedo, and Raju Shah for cause. United States

v. Hall, 152 F.3d 381 (5th Cir. 1998), cert. denied, 119 S. Ct.

1767 (1999). We further conclude that the district court’s

statements during voir dire did not chill the candor of the

prospective jurors or prevent Dominguez from learning whether the

prospective jurors would follow a presumption of innocence

instruction. United States v. Rowe, 106 F.3d 1226 (5th Cir.

1997); United States v. Shannon, 21 F.3d 77 (5th Cir. 1994). 

Finally, Dominguez argues that the district court abused its

discretion when it implicitly denied his motion for new trial. 

We have reviewed the record and there is no abuse of discretion. 

United States v. Doke, 171 F.3d 240, 246 (5th Cir. 1999). 

AFFIRMED.
###### Editorial Note on Part 479

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 479 appear by T.D. ATF-487, 68 FR 3752, Jan. 24, 2003.

#### § 479.68 Qualified manufacturer.

A manufacturer qualified under this part to engage in such business may make firearms without payment of the making tax. However, such manufacturer shall report and register each firearm made in the manner prescribed by this part.

[36 FR 14256, Aug. 3, 1971. Redesignated at 40 FR 16835, Apr. 15, 1975, and amended by T.D. ATF-271, 53 FR 17551, May 17, 1988]
Electrical Conductivity, UMHOS

Day High Low Mean

1 609 356 431

2 531 336 414

3 513 338 416

4 498 361 418

5 537 365 444

6 522 367 444

7 728 410 562

8 645 453 540

9 668 436 569

10 612 407 483

11 573 447 513

12 531 402 460

13 605 416 477

14 599 360 484

15 606 395 480

16 689 400 510

17 586 442 505

18 0 0 0

19 0 0 0

20 0 0 0

21 0 0 0

22 0 0 0

23 0 0 0

24 0 0 0

25 0 0 0

26 0 0 0

27 0 0 0

28 0 0 0

29 0 0 0

30 0 0 0

31 612 498 543

COMMENT(S):

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

Historical Archive and Report Database

Delta Mendota Canal At Check 13 O'Neill

Period: January 2024 Run Date: 2/7/2024
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

JUDGMENT

No. 04-12-00719-CR

Rose Ann LOERA,

Appellant

v.

The STATE of Texas,

Appellee

From the 187th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2004CR3589

Honorable Raymond Angelini, Judge Presiding

BEFORE CHIEF JUSTICE STONE, JUSTICE MARION, AND JUSTICE ALVAREZ

In accordance with this court’s opinion of this date, the judgment of the trial court is 

AFFIRMED.

SIGNED October 9, 2013.

_____________________________

Catherine Stone, Chief Justice
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA

FOURTH DISTRICT

ANTONIO E. WARD,

Appellant,

v.

IVANHOE ESTATES HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION, INC.,

Appellee.

No. 4D21-1779

[March 10, 2022]

Appeal from the Circuit Court for the Seventeenth Judicial Circuit, 

Broward County; Jeffrey R. Levenson, Judge; L.T. Case No. CACE19-

022931 (09).

David W. Rodstein and Robert R. Edwards of Miller, George & Suggs, 

PLLC, Fort Lauderdale, for appellant.

Paul J. Milberg of Milberg Klein, P.L., Boca Raton, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.

KLINGENSMITH, KUNTZ and ARTAU, JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                       5
<MULTIPLIER>                    1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>               JAN-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                  FEB-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                    MAY-02-1998
<CASH>                                              883
<SECURITIES>                                          0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    32,727
<ALLOWANCES>                                        764
<INVENTORY>                                      65,777
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 99,439
<PP&E>                                           45,938
<DEPRECIATION>                                    7,617
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  145,470
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            33,415
<BONDS>                                               0
<COMMON>                                            104
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                 0
<PREFERRED>                                           0
<OTHER-SE>                                       21,451
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    145,470
<SALES>                                          60,388
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 60,388
<CGS>                                            52,643
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    50,527
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                      0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                      0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                1,685
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                   (938)
<INCOME-TAX>                                      (334)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                               (604)
<DISCONTINUED>                                        0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                       0
<CHANGES>                                             0
<NET-INCOME>                                      (604)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     (.06)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     (.06)
        

</TABLE>
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY HIGH

 23,835

 23,825

 26,061

 27,398

 28,205

 29,364

 30,558

 31,164

 29,821

 30,507

 29,106

 21,673

 0

 0

 0

 17,408

 16,418

 19,612

 20,102

 20,671

 20,360

 21,219

 22,184

 20,954

 20,856

 19,299

 17,195

 14,276

 11,556

 11,121

 13,855

 13,707

 14,108

 12,432

 17,002

 17,462

 18,090

 18,015

 17,837

 16,743

 16,685

 17,266

 15,487

 0

 0

 0

 9,173

 7,421

 6,728

 6,746

 7,016

 7,055

 7,603

 7,467

 8,364

 8,394

 8,379

 7,514

 6,183

 4,406

 2,826

 2,892

 20,273

 20,153

 19,452

 21,503

 22,804

 23,551

 24,065

 24,766

 23,503

 23,541

 23,357

 19,099

 0

 0

 0

 11,889

 10,403

 11,778

 13,318

 13,717

 13,767

 14,079

 15,013

 15,138

 14,231

 13,765

 12,685

 10,665

 8,350

 7,355

 8,127

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

JANUARY 2001 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: February 8, 2001

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

PORT CHICAGO BOTTOM IN SUISUN BAY
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

EASTERN DISTRICT

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

Respondent

v.

JULIA KINNEY,

Petitioner

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 447 EAL 2019

Petition for Allowance of Appeal 

from the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 4th day of February, 2020, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is 

DENIED.