alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>


                                                                   EXHIBIT 12.3


                             PACCAR AND SUBSIDIARIES

                COMPUTATION OF RATIO OF EARNINGS TO FIXED CHARGES
                             (Thousands of Dollars)

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>

                                                                                          Nine Months Ended
                                                                                            September 30
                                                                                      1999                    1998
                                                                             -------------------------------------
<S>                                                                            <C>                       <C>
FIXED CHARGES
   Interest expense -
     PACCAR and subsidiaries (1)                                             $     136,515             $   121,705
   Portion of rentals deemed interest                                               13,312                  10,915
                                                                             -------------------------------------

TOTAL FIXED CHARGES                                                          $     149,827             $   132,620
                                                                             =====================================

EARNINGS
   Income before taxes -
     PACCAR and subsidiaries                                                 $     634,400             $   473,135
   Fixed charges                                                                   149,827                 132,620
                                                                             -------------------------------------

EARNINGS AS DEFINED                                                          $     784,227             $   605,755
                                                                             =====================================

RATIO OF EARNINGS TO FIXED CHARGES                                                   5.23x                   4.57x

</TABLE>

(1) Exclusive of interest, if any, paid to PACCAR.
§ 220.115 Need to follow prescribed treatment. ( a ) *What treatment the claimant must follow.* In order to get a disability annuity, the claimant must follow treatment prescribed by his or her physician if this treatment can restore the claimant's ability to work.
( b ) *When the claimant does not follow prescribed treatment.* If the claimant does not follow the prescribed treatment without a good reason, the Board will find him or her not disabled or, if the claimant is already receiving a disability annuity, the Board will stop paying the annuity.
( c ) *Acceptable reasons for failure to follow prescribed treatment.* The following are examples of a good reason for not following treatment: ( 1 ) The specific medical treatment is contrary to the established teaching and tenets of the claimant's religion.
( 2 ) The prescribed treatment would be cataract surgery for one eye, when there is an impairment of the other eye resulting in a severe loss of vision and is not subject to improvement through surgery.
( 3 ) Surgery was previously performed with unsuccessful results and the same surgery is again being recommended for the same impairment.
( 4 ) The treatment because of its magnitude (e.g., open heart surgery), unusual nature (e.g., organ transplant), or other reason is very risky for the claimant.
( 5 ) The treatment involves amputation of an extremity, or a major part of an extremity.
For Immediate Release
July 7, 2011
 SAP Supervisory Board Extends Executive Board Contracts
 Tenures of SAP Co-CEOs Bill McDermott and Jim Hagemann Snabe Extended to June 30,
2017;Executive Board Member Gerhard Oswald to June 30, 2014
 WALLDORF, Germany  July 7, 2011  
  http://www.sap.com/corporate-en/our-company/executive-board.epx
 About SAP
 www.sap.com
   ©




---



##### 



SAP Supervisory Board Extends Executive Board Contracts
    
    Page 2
 Note to editors:
 www.sap.com/photos www.sap-tv.com
 @sapnews
 For customers interested in learning more about SAP products:
 For more information, press only:  press@sap.com  james.dever@sap.com  christoph.liedtke@sap.com
 For more information, financial community only:  stefan.gruber@sap.com  martin.cohen@sap.com
### §206. Revocation of license

The license of any person whose permanent allegiance is due to the United States to practice pharmacy in the consular districts of the United States in China may be revoked by the consul if such person be found to have obtained such license by fraud, or be addicted to the use of any narcotic or stimulant, or to be suffering from physical or mental disease, in such manner and to such extent as to render it expedient that in the interests of the public his license be canceled; or to be of an immoral character; or if such person be convicted in any court of competent jurisdiction of any offense involving moral turpitude. It shall be the duty of the consul to investigate any case in which it is discovered by him or made to appear to his satisfaction that any license issued under the provisions of this chapter is revocable and shall, after full hearing, if in his judgment the facts warrant it, revoke such license.

(Mar. 3, 1915, ch. 74, §4, 38 Stat. 819.)
### SUBCHAPTER I—SHORT TITLE
```

[Congressional Bills 114th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 3709 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

114th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 3709

 To make permanent the pilot program administered by the Secretary of 
  Veterans Affairs regarding enhanced contract care authority for the 
 health care needs of veterans located in highly rural areas, and for 
                            other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            October 8, 2015

    Mr. Poliquin (for himself and Mrs. Kirkpatrick) introduced the 
   following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Veterans' 
                                Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To make permanent the pilot program administered by the Secretary of 
  Veterans Affairs regarding enhanced contract care authority for the 
 health care needs of veterans located in highly rural areas, and for 
                            other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Helping our Rural Veterans Receive 
Health Care Act''.

SEC. 2. PROGRAM OF ENHANCED CONTRACT CARE AUTHORITY FOR HEALTH CARE 
              NEEDS OF VETERANS IN HIGHLY RURAL AREAS.

    (a) Permanent Project ARCH.--Subsection (a) of section 403 of the 
Veterans' Mental Health and Other Care Improvements Act of 2008 (Public 
Law 110-387; 38 U.S.C. 1703 note) is amended--
            (1) by striking paragraph (3);
            (2) by redesignating paragraph (4) as paragraph (3); and
            (3) in paragraph (3), as so redesignated--
                    (A) by striking ``Veterans Integrated Service 
                Networks (and such other locations as the Secretary 
                considers appropriate)'' and inserting ``locations''; 
                and
                    (B) by adding at the end the following new 
                subparagraph:
                    ``(F) Such other locations that the Secretary 
                determines necessary to ensure that all covered 
                veterans may participate in the program.''.
    (b) Conforming Amendments.--Such section 403 is further amended--
            (1) by striking ``pilot program'' each place it appears and 
        inserting ``program''; and
            (2) in subsection (k)(2), by striking ``regarding'' and all 
        that follows through the period and inserting ``regarding the 
        continuation of the program.''.
                                 <all>
```
#### William Saunders, Respondent, v. Arkin-Zweig, Inc., et al., Appellants.

Order entered December 23, 1947, unanimously affirmed, with $10 costs and disbursements to the respondent. The date for the examination to proceed to be fixed in the order. Do opinion. Settle order on notice. Present — Peck, P. J., Dore, Callahan, Yan Yoorhis and Shientag, JJ.
### §§601, 602. Omitted

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

This part has not been funded since the fiscal year ending June 30, 1968.

Section 601, Pub. L. 85–864, title XI, §1111, as added Pub. L. 89–698, title II, §202(3), Oct. 29, 1966, 80 Stat. 1070; amended Pub. L. 96–88, title III, §301(a)(1), title V, §507, Oct. 17, 1979, 93 Stat. 677, 692, authorized appropriations for fiscal years ending June 30, 1967 and June 30, 1968, for international affairs institutes for secondary school teachers.

Section 602, Pub. L. 85–864, title XI, §1112, as added Pub. L. 89–698, title II, §202(3), Oct. 29, 1966, 80 Stat. 1070; amended Pub. L. 96–88, title III, §301(a)(1), title V, §507, Oct. 17, 1979, 93 Stat. 677, 692, authorized payment of stipends to individuals studying in programs assisted under section 601 of this title.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 12-6384

MICHAEL A. WILLIAMS,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

v.

MARSHAL GRIFFIN; OFFICER FOX; OFFICER GRAY; OFFICER 

ALPERSTEIN; OFFICER ANDERSON; OFFICER CLARK; JOSEPH M. 

LIGHTSEY; MADONNA GODWIN, Nurse; STEVE DOLINSKI, Head 

Director of Nursing,

Defendants – Appellees,

JOSEPH M. LIGHTSEY; MADONNA GODWIN, Nurse; STEVE DOLINSKI, 

Head Director of Nursing,

Defendants.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern 

District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Louise W. Flanagan, 

District Judge. (5:10-ct-03122-FL)

Submitted: June 14, 2012 Decided: June 19, 2012

Before WILKINSON, NIEMEYER, and KEENAN, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Michael Antwon Williams, Appellant Pro Se. Elizabeth F. 

Parsons, Assistant Attorney General, Raleigh, North Carolina; 

Elizabeth Pharr McCullough, Kelly Elizabeth Street, YOUNG, MOORE 
2

& HENDERSON, PA, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
3

PER CURIAM:

Michael A. Williams appeals the district court’s order 

denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint. We 

have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. 

Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district 

court. Williams v. Griffin, No. 5:10-ct-03122-FL (E.D.N.C. Feb. 

22, 2012). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and 

legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials 

before the court and argument would not aid the decisional 

process.

AFFIRMED
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 00-4571

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, versus MARK L. SIMONS, Defendant - Appellant.Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. James C. Cacheris, Senior District Judge. (CR-98-375) Submitted: January 31, 2001 Decided: March 19, 2001 Before WILKINS and NIEMEYER, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Marvin D. Miller, LAW OFFICES OF MARVIN D. MILLER, Alexandria, Virginia, for Appellant. Helen F. Fahey, United States Attorney, G. David Hackney, Assistant United States Attorney, Alexandria, Virginia, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM:This case is before us on appeal of the district court’s decision on remand as to whether government agents intentionally and deliberately disregarded the notice provisions of Fed. R. Crim. P. 41(d) such that the motion to suppress filed by Mark L. Simons should be granted. See United States v. Simons , 206 F.3d 392 (4th Cir. 2000). On remand, the district court heard evidence and had the opportunity to assess the credibility of the witnesses as tothe pertinent issue. The district court concluded that the government’s violation of Rule 41(d) in this case was, at most, negligent. We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s decision. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
```

[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 198 (Friday, October 12, 2012)]
[Notices]
[Page 62236]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2012-25215]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

EXPORT-IMPORT BANK OF THE UNITED STATES

[Public Notice: 2012-0529]

Application for Final Commitment for a Long-term Loan or 
Financial Guarantee in Excess of $100 million; 25 Day Comment Period

AGENCY: Export-Import Bank of the United States.

ACTION: Notice of 25 day comment period regarding an application for 
final commitment for a long-term loan or financial guarantee in excess 
of $100 million.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

Reason for Notice

    This Notice is to inform the public, in accordance with Section 
3(c)(10) of the Charter of the Export-Import Bank of the United States 
(``Ex-Im Bank''), that Ex-Im Bank has received an application for final 
commitment for a long-term loan or financial guarantee in excess of 
$100 million (as calculated in accordance with Section 3(c)(10) of the 
Charter).
    Comments received within the comment period specified below will be 
presented to the Ex-Im Bank Board of Directors prior to final action on 
this Transaction.
    Reference: AP087414XX.

Purpose and Use

    Brief description of the purpose of the transaction:
    To support the export of U.S. manufactured aircraft to Russia.
    Brief non-proprietary description of the anticipated use of the 
items being exported:
    To provide passenger air service between Russia and other 
countries.
    To the extent that Ex-Im Bank is reasonably aware, the item(s) 
being exported may be used to produce exports or provide services in 
competition with the exportation of goods or provision of services by a 
United States industry.

Parties

    Principal Supplier: The Boeing Company.
    Obligor: OJSC VEB-Leasing.
    Guarantor(s): Bank for Development and Foreign Economic Affairs 
(Vnesheconombank).

Description of Items Being Exported

    Boeing 777 aircraft.
    Information On Decision: Information on the final decision for this 
transaction will be available in the ``Summary Minutes of Meetings of 
Board of Directors'' on http://www.exim.gov/articles.cfm/board%20minute.
    Confidential Information: Please note that this notice does not 
include confidential or proprietary business information; information 
which, if disclosed, would violate the Trade Secrets Act; or 
information which would jeopardize jobs in the United States by 
supplying information that competitors could use to compete with 
companies in the United States.

DATES: Comments must be received on or before November 6, 2012 to be 
assured of consideration before final consideration of the transaction 
by the Board of Directors of Ex-Im Bank.

ADDRESSES: Comments may be submitted through www.regulations.gov.

Kathryn Hoff-Patrinos,
Deputy General Counsel.
[FR Doc. 2012-25215 Filed 10-11-12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6690-01-P
```
### SUBCHAPTER I—NATIONAL EDUCATION GOALS
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
 Washington, D.C. 20549
 FORM 8-K
 CURRENT REPORT
Pursuant to Section 13 OR 15(d) of The Securities Exchange Act of 1934
 Date of Report (Date of earliest event reported): June 29, 2011
 Penn Millers Holding Corporation
  Pennsylvania

001-34496

80-0482459(State or other jurisdiction
of incorporation)

(Commission File Number)

(IRS Employer Identification No.)
 72 North Franklin Street, PO Box P
Wilkes-Barre, Pennsylvania

18773(Address of principal executive offices)

(Zip Code)
 (800) 233-8347
 Not Applicable
 (Former name or former address, if changed since last report.)
  o

Written communications pursuant to Rule 425 under the Securities Act (17 CFR 230.425)o

Soliciting material pursuant to Rule 14a-12 under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.14a-12)o

Pre-commencement communications pursuant to Rule 14d-2(b) under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.14d-2(b))o

Pre-commencement communications pursuant to Rule 13e-4(c) under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.13e-4(c))




---



##### 



Item 8.01
    
    Other Events.
   Item 9.01
    
    Financial Statements and Exhibits.
 Exhibits
 99.1
    
    Press Release of Penn Millers Holding Corporation, dated June 29, 2011




---



##### 



SIGNATURES
  PENN MILLERS HOLDING CORPORATIONDate: June 29, 2011
    By:
    /s/ Douglas A. GaudetDouglas A. GaudetPresident and Chief Executive Officer  ExhibitNumber
    
    Description99.1
    
    Press Release of Penn Millers Holding Corporation, dated June 29, 2011
Appendix F: Administrative Unit Maps

National Forests in Mississippi Land and Resource Management Plan

Map 21 – Delta Geographic Area Ecological Systems
Appendix F: Administrative Unit Maps

National Forests in Mississippi Land and Resource Management Plan

Map 22 – Delta Geographic Area Fire Use Suitability Classification
Appendix F: Administrative Unit Maps

National Forests in Mississippi Land and Resource Management Plan

Map 23 – Delta Geographic Area Minerals Suitability Classification
Appendix F: Administrative Unit Maps

National Forests in Mississippi Land and Resource Management Plan

Map 24 – Delta Geographic Area Recreation Suitability Classification
Appendix F: Administrative Unit Maps

National Forests in Mississippi Land and Resource Management Plan

Map 25 – Delta Geographic Area Special Uses Suitability Classification
Appendix F: Administrative Unit Maps

National Forests in Mississippi Land and Resource Management Plan

Map 26 – Delta Geographic Area Timber Suitability Classification
Appendix F: Administrative Unit Maps

National Forests in Mississippi Land and Resource Management Plan

Map 27 – Dowling Bayou Archaeological Site, Delta NF
Appendix F: Administrative Unit Maps

National Forests in Mississippi Land and Resource Management Plan

Map 27v – Dowling Bayou Archaeological Site Vicinity Map, Delta NF
Appendix F: Administrative Unit Maps

National Forests in Mississippi Land and Resource Management Plan

Map 28 – Red Gum Research Natural Area, Delta NF
Appendix F: Administrative Unit Maps

National Forests in Mississippi Land and Resource Management Plan

Map 28v – Red Gum Research Natural Area Vicinity Map, Delta NF
Appendix F: Administrative Unit Maps

National Forests in Mississippi Land and Resource Management Plan

Map 29 – Overcup Oak – Water Hickory Research Natural Area, Delta NF
Appendix F: Administrative Unit Maps

National Forests in Mississippi Land and Resource Management Plan

Map 29v – Overcup Oak – Water Hickory Research Natural Area Vicinity Map, Delta NF
Appendix F: Administrative Unit Maps

National Forests in Mississippi Land and Resource Management Plan

Map 30 – Green Ash - Sugarberry Research Natural Area, Delta NF
Appendix F: Administrative Unit Maps

National Forests in Mississippi Land and Resource Management Plan

Map 30v – Green Ash - Sugarberry Research Natural Area Vicinity Map, Delta NF
Appendix F: Administrative Unit Maps

National Forests in Mississippi Land and Resource Management Plan

Map 31 – Cypress Bayou Botanical Area, Delta NF
Appendix F: Administrative Unit Maps

National Forests in Mississippi Land and Resource Management Plan

Map 31v – Cypress Bayou Botanical Area Vicinity Map, Delta NF
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

DAY ELEV

 577.92

 578.46

 580.52

 581.03

 580.71

 579.84

 581.15

 580.14

 580.71

 581.12

 581.53

 581.35

 584.80

 584.50

 584.82

 584.26

 584.11

 584.09

 584.29

 585.50

 584.78

 584.54

 583.83

 583.72

 584.37

 584.05

 583.38

 584.38

 584.97

 585.18

 18,367

 18,664

 19,824

 20,118

 19,933

 19,434

 20,188

 19,605

 19,933

 20,170

 20,411

 20,305

 22,384

 22,199

 22,396

 22,050

 21,958

 21,946

 22,069

 22,821

 22,371

 22,223

 21,787

 21,720

 22,118

 21,921

 21,514

 22,124

 22,488

 22,620

STORAGE

-545

+297

+1,160

+294

-185

-499

+754

-583

+328

+237

+241

-106

+2,079

-185

+197

-346

-92

-12

+123

+752

-450

-148

-436

-67

+398

-197

-407

+610

+364

+132

CHANGE

41,964

37,351

32,924

27,629

23,234

19,778

17,846

13,906

13,603

13,023

11,288

9,612

9,293

6,999

6,362

6,017

6,119

6,106

6,106

6,357

5,695

5,741

5,614

5,821

6,048

5,777

5,677

6,160

6,145

6,072

INFLOW

 10,143

 10,679

 11,824

 12,174

 12,364

 12,532

 12,610

 12,707

 13,350

 12,815

 10,768

 9,426

 8,157

 7,007

 6,175

 6,104

 6,078

 6,025

 5,956

 5,887

 5,836

 5,729

 5,746

 5,769

 5,758

 5,790

 5,793

 5,763

 5,872

 5,914

POWER

 32,009

 26,431

 20,424

 15,220

 10,875

 7,410

 4,768

 1,407

 0

 0

 311

 152

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 6

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

SPILL

 85

 85

 85

 85

 85

 85

 85

 85

 85

 85

 85

 85

 85

 85

 85

 85

 85

 85

 85

 85

 85

 85

 85

 85

 85

 85

 85

 85

 85

 85

FISHTRAP

 2

 6

 6

 2

 3

 3

 3

 1

 3

 4

 2

 2

 3

 0

 3

 2

 2

 2

 3

 0

 1

 2

 3

 1

 4

 1

 4

 4

 4

 6

C.F.S.

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

APRIL 2011 KESWICK RESERVOIR DAILY OPERATIONS RUN DATE: May 1, 2011

RES.

EVAP

C.F.S.

COMPUTED*

ACRE-FEET

RELEASE - C.F.S. 

TOTALS +3,708 374,267 250,751 119,013 2,550 82

ACRE-FEET +3,708 742,359 497,365 236,062 5,058 163

SUMMARY

RELEASE (ACRE-FEET)

POWER 497,365

SPILL 236,062

 18,912

FISH TRAP 5,058

SPRING

CR. P. P.

RELEASE (1)

 2,016

 2,012

 1,922

 1,874

 1,429

 1,571

 1,281

 1,506

 1,332

 1,294

 1,153

 1,065

 1,159

 1,282

 1,280

 1,087

 50

 606

 1,333

 1,194

 1,184

 625

 124

 125

 47

 50

 81

 50

 1,303

 1,342

 31,377

 62,236

*COMPUTED INFLOW IS SUM OF CHANGE IN STORAGE, RELEASES, AND EVAPORATION.

(1) EVAPORATION RECORDS TAKEN FROM SHASTA PAN.

SHASTA

RELEASE

C.F.S

 43,333

 36,749

 31,829

 26,562

 22,788

 19,352

 17,850

 13,411

 12,576

 11,202

 9,356

 8,099

 7,586

 5,258

 4,658

 4,672

 5,830

 5,183

 4,407

 4,723

 4,310

 4,870

 5,298

 5,578

 5,916

 5,939

 5,578

 6,332

 4,732

 4,904

 348,881

 692,005
#### John E. Durand, as Executor, etc., Plaintiff, v. John H. Gregory and Others, as Executors, etc., and The Central Bank of Rochester, Defendants.

Action upon the submission dismissed, without costs, except actual disbursements. Held, that the plaintiff has no equitable right to compel the defendant Central Bank to proceed against the Wilder estate. Order to be settled before Mr. Justice Merrell on two days’ notice. All concurred.