alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
### §7221g. Records transfer

State educational agencies and local educational agencies, as quickly as possible and to the extent practicable, shall ensure that a student's records and, if applicable, a student's individualized education program as defined in section 1401 of this title, are transferred to a charter school upon the transfer of the student to the charter school, and to another public school upon the transfer of the student from a charter school to another public school, in accordance with applicable State law.

(Pub. L. 89–10, title IV, §4308, formerly title V, §5208, as added Pub. L. 107–110, title V, §501, Jan. 8, 2002, 115 Stat. 1798; amended Pub. L. 108–446, title III, §305(g)(2), Dec. 3, 2004, 118 Stat. 2805; renumbered title IV, §4308, and amended Pub. L. 114–95, title IV, §§4001(b)(2)(A), (B), (D)(iii), 4301(3), Dec. 10, 2015, 129 Stat. 1967, 2012.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

2015—Pub. L. 114–95, §4301(3), inserted "as quickly as possible and" before "to the extent practicable".

2004—Pub. L. 108–446 substituted "section 1401" for "section 1401(11)".

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date of 2015 Amendment

Amendment by Pub. L. 114–95 effective Dec. 10, 2015, except with respect to certain noncompetitive programs and competitive programs, see section 5 of Pub. L. 114–95, set out as a note under section 6301 of this title.
§ 30.102 In general, how does an employee file a claim for additional impairment or wage-loss under Part E of EEOICPA? ( a ) An employee previously awarded impairment benefits by OWCP may file a claim for additional impairment benefits. Such claim must be based on an increase in the employee's impairment rating attributable to the covered illness or illnesses from the impairment rating that formed the basis for the last award of such benefits by OWCP. OWCP will only adjudicate claims for such an increased rating that are filed at least two years from the date of the last award of impairment benefits. However, OWCP will not wait two years before it will adjudicate a claim for additional impairment that is based on an allegation that the employee sustained a new covered illness.
( b ) An employee previously awarded wage-loss benefits by OWCP may be eligible for additional wage-loss benefits for periods of wage-loss that were not addressed in a prior claim only if the employee had not reached his or her Social Security retirement age at the time of the prior award. OWCP will adjudicate claims filed on a yearly basis in connection with each succeeding calendar year for which qualifying wage-loss under Part E is alleged, as well as claims that aggregate calendar years for which qualifying wage-loss is alleged.
( c ) Employees should use Form EE-10 to claim for additional impairment or wage-loss benefits under Part E of EEOICPA. ( 1 ) The employee, or the person filing the claim on behalf of the employee, shall affirm that the information provided on Form EE-10 is true, and must inform OWCP of any subsequent changes to that information.
( 2 ) The employee is responsible for submitting with any claim filed under this section, or arranging for the submission of, factual and medical evidence establishing that he or she experienced another calendar year of qualifying wage-loss, and/or medical evidence establishing that he or she has an increased minimum impairment rating, as appropriate.
[71 FR 78534, Dec. 29, 2006, as amended at 84 FR 3047, Feb. 8, 2019]
#### Keith Russell JUDD, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. UNITED STATES, Defendant-Appellee.

No. 2006-1476.

United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit.

June 22, 2006.

Keith Russell Judd, pro se.

ORDER

The appellant having failed to pay the docketing fee required by Federal Circuit Rule 52(a)(1) within the time permitted by the rules, it is

ORDERED that the notice of appeal be, and the same hereby is, DISMISSED, for failure to prosecute in accordance with the rules.
#### Maria T. GARCIA; et al., Petitioners, v. Alberto R. GONZALES, Attorney General, Respondent.

No. 04-76356.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted Feb. 13, 2006.*

Decided Feb. 22, 2006.

Charles E. Niehol, Esq., Law Office of Charles E. Niehol, San Francisco, CA, for Petitioners.

Ronald E. LeFevre, Chief Counsel, Office of the District Counsel, San Francisco, CA, Bridget McNeil, Shelley R. Goad, Esq., U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, DC, for Respondent.

Before: FERNANDEZ, RYMER, and BYBEE, Circuit Judges.

*

 The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. *See*Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

MEMORANDUM **

Maria T. Garcia, her husband Raul Gerardo Villanueva, and their daughters, Adriana Garcia and Alejandra Garcia, all natives and citizens of Mexico, petition for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ order summarily affirming an immigration judge’s (“IJ”) order denying their applications for asylum. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We review for substantial evidence, *see Rostomian v. INS,*210 F.3d 1088, 1089 (9th Cir.2000), and we deny the petition for review.

Substantial evidence supports the IJ’s determination that Garcia failed to establish past persecution or a well-founded fear of future persecution in Mexico because she failed to establish that she or her family would be targeted on account of a protected ground. *See id.*(rejecting an asylum claim based on general civil strife or widespread random violence); *see also Ochave v. INS,*254 F.3d 859, 865-66 (9th Cir.2001) (requiring alien to establish nexus between alleged persecution and protected ground).

We decline to consider Garcia’s contention that her asylum claim should be considered in light of the 2004 State Department Report for Mexico, because it was not part of the administrative record. *See*8 U.S.C. § 1252(b)(4)(A); *Fisher v. INS,*79 F.3d 955, 963 (9th Cir.1996) (en banc).

The voluntary departure period was stayed, and that stay will expire upon issuance of the mandate. *See Desta v. Ashcroft,*365 F.3d 741 (9th Cir.2004).

PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED

**

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

DAY HIGH

 26,192

 24,175

 26,726

 25,323

 25,786

 23,270

 27,785

 29,168

 28,292

 29,115

 28,232

 27,748

 27,539

 26,775

 24,977

 15,925

 25,607

 24,681

 26,151

 25,807

 27,390

 24,664

 23,794

 24,318

 23,494

 22,055

 24,391

 22,212

 21,633

 19,033

 13,529

 14,454

 16,240

 12,860

 11,515

 15,712

 16,418

 17,142

 14,120

 16,275

 15,089

 15,821

 14,687

 9,876

 9,157

 8,884

 8,662

 10,992

 13,593

 13,450

 12,764

 11,556

 8,831

 10,829

 11,692

 9,818

 10,339

 9,482

 9,424

 11,232

 18,780

 19,373

 19,927

 18,375

 19,246

 19,640

 21,919

 22,830

 22,794

 21,445

 21,229

 21,137

 20,335

 18,328

 14,510

 12,436

 15,621

 18,173

 18,270

 17,733

 18,606

 17,900

 16,275

 17,683

 18,053

 17,389

 17,599

 16,625

 16,587

 15,079

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

SEPTEMBER 2008 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: October 10, 2008

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

PORT CHICAGO TOP IN SUISUN BAY
---

Exhibit 99.10

March 31, 2015

CONSENT OF JAMES TURNER

United States Securities and Exchange Commission

In connection with Silver Wheaton Corp.s (the Company)
Annual Report on Form 40-F for the year ended December 31, 2014 (the Annual
Report), I, James Turner, BSc (Hons) MSc CEng MIMMM, Senior Mineral Process
Engineer, Micon International Ltd., hereby consent to the inclusion in, or
incorporation by reference into, the Annual Report and the Companys
Registration Statement on Form S-8 (File No. 333-128128), Form F-10 (File No.
333-202429) and Form F-3D (File No. 333-194702), of the following:

| | 1. | Technical Report on the Mineral Reserves and Mineral
      Resources of the Salobo Copper-Gold Mine Carajas, Pará State, Brazil,
      dated March 19, 2013.
| | -- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Yours truly,

|/s/ James Turner                        | 
|--------------------------------------- | 
|James Turner, BSc (Hons) MSc CEng MIMMM | 
|Senior Mineral Process Engineer         | 
|Micon International Ltd.                | 

---
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                                <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                    3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1997
<CASH>                                             980
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                      759
<ALLOWANCES>                                       400
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                           2,531
<DEPRECIATION>                                   1,697
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   3,717
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                       2,393
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     3,717
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                   284
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                      226
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                     58
<INCOME-TAX>                                       (3)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                 61
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                        61
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .15
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
### §9111. Administrative funds

Notwithstanding any other provision of this chapter, the Director shall establish one account to be used to pay the Federal administrative costs of carrying out this chapter, and not more than $17,000,000 of the total funds appropriated under sections 9108(g), 9123, and 9176 of this title shall be placed in such account.

(Pub. L. 94–462, title II, §210C, as added Pub. L. 111–340, title I, §108, Dec. 22, 2010, 124 Stat. 3599; amended Pub. L. 115–410, §6, Dec. 31, 2018, 132 Stat. 5415.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

This chapter, referred to in text, was in the original "this Act" and was translated as reading "this title", meaning title II of Pub. L. 94–462, known as the Museum and Library Services Act, to reflect the probable intent of Congress.

#### Amendments

2018—Pub. L. 115–410 substituted "$17,000,000 of the total funds" for "a total of 7 percent of the funds" and "sections 9108(g), 9123, and 9176 of this title" for "sections 9108(f), 9123, and 9176 of this title".
#### Aaltje Dekker, as Administratrix, etc., Respondent, v. Richey, Browne & Donald, Appellant.

Judgment and order reversed and new trial ordered, costs to appellant to abide event, unless plaintiff stipulates to reduce verdict to $3,500; in which event judgment as so modified and order affirmed, without costs. No opinion. Order to be settled on notice. Present— Ingraham, P. J., McLaughlin, Laughlin, Scott and Hotchkiss, JJ.
#### The People of the State of New York ex rel. Joseph R. Reynolds, Relator, v. Rhinelander Waldo, as Police Commissioner of the City of New York, Respondent.

Determination confirmed, with fifty dollars costs and disbursements. Mo opinion. Jenks, P. J., Burr, Thomas, Stapleton and Putnam, JJ., concurred.
###### Editorial Note on Part 41

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 41 (formerly part 275) appear at T.D. ATF-460, 66 FR 39093, July 27, 2001.

#### § 41.263 Maintenance of records and reports.

All records and reports required by this subpart must be maintained separately, chronologically by transaction or reporting date, at the importer's principal place of business. The appropriate TTB officer may, pursuant to a written request, authorize files, or an individual file, to be maintained at another business location under the control of the importer, provided that the alternative location does not cause undue inconvenience to TTB when attempting to examine the files and does not delay the timely transmittal of any documents required to be submitted to TTB.

(26 U.S.C. 5741)
§ 10.535 How are dependents defined, and what information must the employee report? ( a ) Dependents in disability cases are defined in § 10.405. While the employee has one or more dependents, the employee's basic compensation for wage loss or for permanent impairment shall be augmented as provided in 5 U.S.C. 8110. (The rules for death claims are found in § 10.414.)
( b ) An employee who is receiving augmented compensation on account of dependents must advise OWCP immediately of any change in the number or status of dependents. The employee should also promptly refund to OWCP any amounts received on account of augmented compensation after the right to receive augmented compensation has ceased. Any difference between actual entitlement and the amount already paid beyond the date entitlement ended is an overpayment of compensation and may be recovered pursuant to 5 U.S.C. 8129 and other relevant statutes.
( c ) An employee who is receiving augmented compensation shall be periodically required to submit a statement as to any dependents, or to submit supporting documents such as birth or marriage certificates or court orders, to determine if he or she is still entitled to augmented compensation.
Exhibit 32.2

Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, As Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Maidenform Brands, Inc. (the "Company") for the year ended January 2,
2010, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Christopher W. Vieth, Executive Vice President, Chief Operating Officer and Chief Financial Officer of
the Company, certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



By:

/s/ CHRISTOPHER W. VIETH Name:  Christopher W. Vieth
Title:     Executive Vice President, Chief Operating Officer and
            Chief Financial Officer
            (principal financial officer)


March 10,
2010

---



QuickLinks
Exhibit 99.12

                       GE CAPITAL MORTGAGE SERVICES, INC.
            OFFICERS' ANNUAL COMPLIANCE CERTIFICATE - SERIES 1999-12

         The undersigned,  Vice Presidents of GE Capital Mortgage Services, Inc.
(the "Servicer"), pursuant to the Pooling and Servicing Agreement for the Series
1999-12 REMIC Multi-Class Mortgage  Pass-Through  Certificates (the "Agreement")
entered into by GE Capital Mortgage Services,  Inc., as Seller and Servicer, and
State Street Bank and Trust Company,  as Trustee,  which  Agreement  requires an
annual  statement of  compliance  to be made to the Trustee by an officer of the
Servicer, hereby state that:

         (i)      a  review  of  the  activities  of  the  Servicer  during  the
                  preceding  calendar  year  and of its  performance  under  the
                  Agreement  has  been  made  under  the  undersigned  officers'
                  supervision; and

         (ii)     to the best of the undersigned  officers' knowledge,  based on
                  such review,  the Servicer has  fulfilled  all of its material
                  obligations  under the Agreement  throughout such year, except
                  as set forth on Exhibit A hereto.

Capitalized  terms used  herein but not  defined  herein  shall have the meaning
given to them in the Agreement.

Dated:            March 24, 2000

By:      /s/ Gregory A. Gibson
------------------------------
         Gregory A. Gibson
         Senior Vice President

By:      /s/ Tim Neer
------------------------------
         Tim Neer
         Vice President

<PAGE>

                                    EXHIBIT A





                                      None
#### § 5.102 False or untrue statements.

Distilled spirits labels, containers, or packaging may not contain any statement or representation that is false or untrue in any particular.
Exhibit 10h

<PAGE>1 of 1
            -------------------------------------------
                           AMENDMENT TO
                     STOCK OPTION AGREEMENTS
                    WITH SBC MERGER PROVISIONS
            -------------------------------------------                  



     The following constitutes an amendment of the terms of

currently outstanding stock options approved for issue on or

after April 8, 1998 and granted before April 1, 1999 under

the provisions of the Ameritech Corporation Long-Term Stock

Incentive Plan.  Notwithstanding any provision to the

contrary in the applicable stock option agreement, the

change in control provisions contained therein shall be

applicable to any change in control which occurs pursuant to

the Agreement and Plan of Merger, dated as of May 10, 1998,

among Ameritech Corporation, SBC Communications Inc. and SBC

Delaware, Inc. (as such agreement may be amended from time

to time).



Date: April 30, 1999                    AMERITECH CORPORATION



                                        By__________________________

                                           Its Corporate Secretary
§ 30.206 How does a claimant prove that the employee was a “covered beryllium employee” exposed to beryllium dust, particles or vapor in the performance of duty? ( a ) Proof of employment or physical presence at a DOE facility, or a beryllium vendor facility as defined in § 30.5(j), because of employment by the United States, a beryllium vendor, or a contractor or subcontractor of a beryllium vendor during a period when beryllium dust, particles or vapor may have been present at such facility, may be made by the submission of any trustworthy records that, on their face or in conjunction with other such records, establish that the employee was employed or present at a covered facility and the time period of such employment or presence.
( b ) If the evidence shows that exposure occurred while the employee was employed or present at a facility during a time frame that is outside the relevant time frame indicated for that facility, OWCP may request that DOE provide additional information on the facility. OWCP will determine whether the evidence of record supports enlarging the relevant time frame for that facility.
( c ) If the evidence shows that exposure occurred while the employee was employed or present at a facility that would have to be designated by DOE as a beryllium vendor under section 7384m of the Act to be a covered facility, and that the facility has not been so designated, OWCP will deny the claim on the ground that the facility is not a covered facility.
( d ) Records from the following sources may be considered as evidence for purposes of establishing employment or presence at a covered facility: ( 1 ) Records or documents created by any federal government agency (including verified information submitted for security clearance), any tribal government, or any state, county, city or local government office, agency, department, board or other entity, or other public agency or office.
( 2 ) Records or documents created by any vendor, processor, or producer of beryllium or related products designated as a beryllium vendor by the DOE in accordance with section 7384m of the Act.
( 3 ) Records or documents created as a by product of any regularly conducted business activity or by an entity that acted as a contractor or subcontractor to the DOE.
[71 FR 78534, Dec. 29, 2006, as amended at 84 FR 3048, Feb. 8, 2019]
EXHIBIT 13.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. §1350, 
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report
of Kodiak Oil & Gas Corp. (the Company) on Form 20-F for the period ended
December 31, 2005 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof
(the Annual Report), I, Lynn A. Peterson, Chief Executive Officer and
Principal Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

|(1) | The Annual Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
          of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|--- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

|(s) | The information contained in this Annual Report fairly presents, in all material
          respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
|--- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Date:      May 1, 2006
By:   /s/ Lynn A. Peterson
       ______________________________________

                Lynn A Peterson
                Chief Executive Officer and
                Principal Financial Officer

---
#### § 205.1 Introduction.

This part sets out the various factors considered in determining an individual's status as an employee representative under section 1(b)(1) of the Railroad Retirement Act, and discusses the procedure for reporting and crediting of compensation and service as an employee representative under that Act. An employee representative is considered to be a covered employee under the provisions of the Railroad Retirement Act.
### §1534. Technical assistance and training

#### (a) In general

#### (1) Technical assistance and agreements

With respect to any grant recipient or other organization, the Administrator may—

(A) offer technical assistance and training; and

(B) enter into contracts and cooperative agreements.

#### (2) Coordination of programs

The Administrator may facilitate the coordination of programs between a grant recipient and other organizations and entities.

#### (b) Training

The Administrator may provide training to any representative designated by a grant recipient in—

(1) coalition building;

(2) task force development;

(3) mediation and facilitation, direct service, assessment and evaluation; or

(4) any other activity related to the purposes of the Program.

(Pub. L. 100–690, title I, §1034, as added Pub. L. 105–20, §2(a)(2), June 27, 1997, 111 Stat. 231.)
(No. 74-CC-390

#### Avalon Building Maintenance, Claimant, *vs.*State of Illinois, Department of Mental Health, Respondent.

*Opinion filed March 25, 1974.*

Avalon Building Maintenance, Claimant, pro se.

William J. Scott, Attorney General; Edward L. S. Arkema, Jr., Assistant Attorney General, for Respondent.

Per Curiam.