alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY ELEV

 123.21

 123.94

 123.70

 123.46

 122.95

 122.46

 122.89

 123.38

 124.10

 123.99

 123.84

 123.80

 124.09

 124.71

 124.36

 124.39

 123.57

 123.19

 122.87

 122.96

 122.48

 122.57

 122.84

 122.55

 122.54

 122.55

 123.44

 124.03

 123.81

 122.97

 123.11

 7,890

 8,233

 8,120

 8,007

 7,769

 7,548

 7,742

 7,970

 8,311

 8,256

 8,186

 8,167

 8,306

 8,616

 8,441

 8,456

 8,059

 7,880

 7,733

 7,773

 7,557

 7,598

 7,719

 7,589

 7,584

 7,589

 7,998

 8,276

 8,172

 7,778

 7,843

STORAGE

-9

+343

-113

-113

-238

-221

+194

+228

+341

-55

-70

-19

+139

+310

-175

+15

-397

-179

-147

+40

-216

+41

+121

-130

-5

+5

+409

+278

-104

-394

+65

CHANGE

1,406

1,491

1,171

1,083

1,021

1,030

1,242

1,270

1,315

1,120

1,117

1,144

1,219

1,300

1,045

1,143

959

1,069

1,048

1,154

1,027

1,173

1,215

1,094

1,149

1,156

1,356

1,345

1,144

999

1,212

INFLOW

 1,325

 1,232

 1,142

 1,054

 1,054

 1,053

 1,050

 1,058

 1,047

 1,051

 1,059

 1,060

 1,063

 1,059

 1,062

 1,075

 1,099

 1,098

 1,056

 1,043

 1,042

 1,056

 1,058

 1,063

 1,056

 1,057

 1,054

 1,112

 1,110

 1,112

 1,109

POWER

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

SPILL

 60

 60

 60

 60

 60

 60

 60

 60

 60

 60

 58

 60

 60

 60

 60

 60

 60

 60

 60

 60

 60

 60

 60

 60

 60

 60

 60

 60

 60

 60

 60

HATCHERY

 1

 1

 1

 1

 2

 2

 1

 2

 1

 2

 1

 1

 1

 0

 0

 0

 0

 1

 0

 1

 1

 1

 1

 2

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

C.F.S.

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

MARCH 2012 LAKE NATOMA DAILY OPERATIONS RUN DATE: May 3, 2012

IN LAKE

EVAP

C.F.S.

COMPUTED*

ACRE-FEET

RELEASE - C.F.S.

TOTALS -56 36,217 33,569 0 1,858 31

ACRE-FEET -56 71,836 66,584 0 3,685 61

COMMENTS:

* COMPUTED INFLOW IS THE SUM OF CHANGE IN STORAGE, RELEASES AND EVAPORATION.

SUMMARY

RELEASES (ACRE-FEET)

POWER 66,584

SPILL 0

FOLSOM SOUTH CANAL

HATCHERY

 1,561

 3,685

 7,899

FOLSOM

SOUTH 

CANAL

 25

 25

 25

 25

 25

 26

 33

 35

 35

 35

 34

 33

 25

 25

 11

 0

 0

 0

 6

 30

 33

 35

 35

 35

 35

 35

 35

 32

 25

 25

 9

 787

 1,561

(1)

(1) INCHES OF EVAPORATION TAKEN FROM FOLSOM PAN.

RELEASES (ACRE-FEET)

TOTAL 71,830
Exhibit 31.1—Section 302 CertificationI, Ellen Z. Lamale, certify that:I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K, and all reports on Form 8-K containingdistribution or servicing reports filed in respect of period included in the year covered bythis annual report, of Principal Life Income Fundings Trust 2005-34;1. Based on my knowledge, the information in these reports, taken as a whole, does not containany untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make thestatements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, notmisleading as of the last day of the period covered by this annual report;2. Based on my knowledge, the distribution or servicing information required to be provided tothe depositor by the trustee under the pooling and servicing, or similar agreement, forinclusion in these reports is included in these reports;3. I am responsible for reviewing the activities performed by the depositor and the trusteeunder the pooling and servicing, or similar agreement, and based upon my knowledge and theannual compliance review required under that agreement, and except as disclosed in thereports, the depositor and trustee have each fulfilled its obligations under that agreement;and4. The reports disclose all significant deficiencies relating to the compliance by the trusteeand the depositor with the minimum servicing or similar standards based upon the reportprovided by an independent public accountant, after conducting a review in compliance with theUniform Single Attestation Program for Mortgage Bankers or similar procedures, as set forth inthe pooling and servicing, or similar agreements, that is included in these reports.In giving the certifications above, I have reasonably relied on information provided to me by thefollowing unaffiliated parties: Ernst and Young and Citibank, N.A.Date: March 24, 2006     By: /s/ Ellen Z. Lamale   Name: Ellen Z. Lamale  Title: Senior Vice President and Chief Actuary
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

DAY ELEV

 223.05

 222.35

 222.27

 223.17

 223.23

 223.32

 222.71

 222.43

 221.65

 221.60

 221.39

 221.44

 221.63

 221.09

 218.97

 219.96

 220.57

 220.29

 219.07

 218.46

 218.16

 218.68

 219.37

 219.37

 219.85

 219.67

 218.75

 218.67

 219.22

 219.72

 51,180

 49,314

 49,102

 51,500

 51,661

 51,901

 50,273

 49,527

 47,467

 47,336

 46,784

 46,915

 47,414

 45,996

 40,508

 43,048

 44,635

 43,905

 40,762

 39,221

 38,470

 39,775

 41,528

 41,528

 42,764

 42,299

 39,951

 39,750

 41,145

 42,428

STORAGE

+507

-1,866

-212

+2,398

+161

+240

-1,628

-746

-2,060

-131

-552

+131

+499

-1,418

-5,488

+2,540

+1,587

-730

-3,143

-1,541

-751

+1,305

+1,753

+0

+1,236

-465

-2,348

-201

+1,395

+1,283

CHANGE

776

747

820

861

1,023

955

933

915

766

605

646

698

685

272

94

19

55

112

87

149

15

0

0

0

1,170

1,503

1,508

1,142

1,066

1,166

PUMPING

 3,268

 4,252

 2,540

 1,431

 1,718

 1,950

 2,652

 3,705

 3,125

 2,232

 1,927

 2,570

 2,327

 2,568

 2,832

 2,973

 1,924

 2,590

 4,363

 3,360

 5,428

 5,009

 5,518

 3,699

 4,151

 4,285

 4,543

 5,567

 4,959

 5,573

PUMPING

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 143

 860

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 1,060

 283

PUMPING

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

GEN.

*

+137

+221

+2

+139

+6

+549

-184

+144

-109

+11

+221

+134

-44

+55

-29

-236

+95

-20

+88

-6

-110

-125

-41

-16

+11

-49

-43

-126

+133

+207

OR

UNITED STATES 

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION

CONSOLIDATED STATE-FEDERAL O'NEILL FOREBAY August 9, 2006

DAILY OPERATIONS

APRIL 2006 RUN DATE:

IN LAKE GEN.

ACRE-FEET O'NEILL

RELEASE - C.F.S. 

TOTALS -8,245 18,788 0 2,346 103,039 +1,015

ACRE-FEET -8,245 37,266 0 4,653 204,378

SUMMARY

 388

RELEASE (ACRE-FEET)

O'NEILL GEN. 0

SAN LUIS PUMP 4,653 388

 50,673

DOS AMIGOS PUMP 204,378

DELIVERIES 

S. LUIS O'NEILL

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 879

 705

 1,670

 3,254

 6,454

CALIF. DOS AMIGOS

AQUEDUCT

2,611

2,344

1,612

1,641

770

567

1,082

2,270

1,429

1,693

1,643

1,804

1,938

1,526

0

4,470

2,574

2,129

2,603

2,440

5,144

5,792

6,442

3,715

3,594

2,597

1,894

3,571

4,819

3,657

 78,371

 155,449

S. LUIS

DELIV.

GAINS(+)

LOSS(-)

C.F.S.

INFLOW - C.F.S.

STATE OF CALIFORNIA

THE RESOURCES AGENCY

DEPARTMENT OF WATER RESOURCES

STATE WATER PROJECT

TOTAL 209,419

 2,013

* DAILY DEL. FIGURES UNAVAILABLE. TOT. DEL. IS INCLUDED IN COMPUTING MONTHLY TOTALS 

Table 18
###### Editorial Note on Part 71

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 71 appear by T.D. ATF-414, 64 FR 49084, Sept. 10, 1999and T.D. ATF-463, 66 FR 42734, 42735, Aug. 15, 2001.

#### § 71.62 Application.

In the case of an application, if the applicant does not request a hearing within the time specified in § 71.59, or within such further time as the appropriate TTB officer may in his discretion allow, the appropriate TTB officer will by order, stating the findings upon which it is based, disapprove the application, and will serve signed duplicate original of such order on the applicant.

[21 FR 1441, Mar. 6, 1956. Redesignated at 40 FR 16835, Apr. 15, 1975, and amended by T.D. ATF-199, 50 FR 9197, Mar. 6, 1985; T.D. ATF-374, 61 FR 29957, June 13, 1996]
### THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS
13 - 16 - 00480 - CR Ex Parte Jose Maria Reyes On a ppeal from the 93rd District Court of Hidalgo County , Texas Trial Cause No. CR
- 3980 - 06 - B(1)

JUDGMENT THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS, having considered this cause on appea l, concludes the appeal should be dismissed. The Court orders the appeal DISMISSED in accordance with its opinion

. We further order this decision certified below for observance. December 1, 2016.
Editorial Note on Part 555
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 555 appear by T.D. ATF-487, 68 FR 3748, Jan. 24, 2003.

§ 555.202 Classes of explosive materials. For purposes of this part, there are three classes of explosive materials. These classes, together with the description of explosive materials comprising each class, are as follows: ( a ) *High explosives.* Explosive materials which can be caused to detonate by means of a blasting cap when unconfined, (for example, dynamite, flash powders, and bulk salutes).
( b ) *Low explosives.* Explosive materials which can be caused to deflagrate when confined (for example, black powder, safety fuses, igniters, igniter cords, fuse lighters, and “display fireworks” classified as UN0333, UN0334, or UN0335 by the U.S. Department of Transportation regulations at 49 CFR 172.101, except for bulk salutes).
( c ) *Blasting agents.* (For example, ammonium nitrate-fuel oil and certain water-gels (see also § 555.11).
[T.D. ATF-87, 46 FR 40384, Aug. 7, 1981, as amended by T.D. ATF-293, 55 FR 3722, Feb. 5, 1990; T.D. ATF-400, 63 FR 45003, Aug. 24, 1998; ATF 2017R-21, 84 FR 13800, Apr. 8, 2019]
### MARIHUANA AND HEALTH REPORTING
###### Editorial Note on Part 27

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 27 appear by T.D. ATF-474, 67 FR 11231, Mar. 13, 2002, and T.D. ATF-479, 67 FR 30799, May 8, 2002.

#### § 27.49 Commercial samples of alcoholic beverages.

Samples of distilled spirits, beer, and wine, to be used in the United States by persons importing alcoholic beverages in commercial quantities, are, subject to the limitations in this section, exempt from the payment of any internal revenue tax imposed on, or by reason of, importation. This exemption applies only to samples to be used for soliciting orders for products of foreign countries. In no case shall this exemption apply to more than one sample of each alcoholic beverage product admitted during any calendar quarter for the use of each such person. No sample of beer shall contain more than 8 ounces, no sample of wine shall contain more than 4 ounces, and no sample of distilled spirits shall contain more than 2 ounces.

(76 Stat. 72; 19 U.S.C. 1202)

[T.D. 6300, 23 FR 5168, July 8, 1958; T.D. ATF-2, 37 FR 22740, Oct. 21, 1972. Redesignated at 40 FR 16835, Apr. 15, 1975]
No. 20544.

#### John V. Cuddy *v.*William J. Whatley.

(404 P.2d 533)

Decided July 19, 1965.

Rehearing denied August 30, 1965.

Groves, Dufford & Nelson, for plaintiff in error.

Mincer and Larson, for defendant in error.

*En Banc.*

Mr. Justice Sutton

delivered the opinion of the Court.

This is a companion case to *Whatley v. Wood,*No. 20588, decided this same day. It is also the second time this phase of the case has been here on writ of error. *Whatley v. Cuddy,*148 Colo. 362, 366 P.2d 671 (1961).

The parties appear in the reverse order from their appearance in the trial court where plaintiff in error, John V. Cuddy, was defendant, and defendant in error, William J. Whatley, was plaintiff. We shall refer to them as Cuddy and Whatley.

*563Whatley originally brought the action to quiet title to certain patented mining property located in Garfield County, Colorado. This is the same land that is the subject matter of the companion case No. 20588, referred to supra. In the original action, Cuddy filed his answer denying plaintiff’s ownership and alleged, in effect, that he (Cuddy) was a bona fide purchaser for value of a leasehold interest in the surface of the property. His motion for a summary judgment was granted for the above reason.

On the first writ of error we reversed the judgment of the trial court in favor of Cuddy because he was held to have been legally put on notice of the state of the title and Whatley’s alleged interest therein due to various recorded instruments; however, in reversing we directed that Cuddy be permitted to present his “proof relating to the validity of the lease in question as he may be advised.”

On re-trial the issue as to the validity of the lease was tried first and the court, after presentation of all the evidence involved in both cases, held Cuddy’s lease to be invalid.

Four questions are raised by Cuddy for our determination on this writ of error. It is necessary, however, for us to determine only one of these, viz:

*Can a plaintiff (here Whatley), who is not in possession of real estate, challenge the title of a defendant who is in possession without first establishing in himself a title superior to that under which defendant occupies the land?*

This question is answered in the negative. *Fastenau v. Engel,*129 Colo. 440, 270 P.2d 1019 (1954); *Harrison v. Everett,*135 Colo. 55, 308 P.2d 216 (1957). We have this same day held in No. 20588 that Whatley, as determined by the trial court, has no interest whatever to the land in dispute, and thus he cannot question the validity of Cuddy’s lease.

We note that in the original action, No. 19609, the de*564fendants in No. 20588 admitted the validity of the lease in question, therefore, in the instant proceeding, since Whatley can have no interest therein, there is now no one involved in these actions who challenges or can challenge Cuddy’s asserted rights. For this reason the judgment is reversed with directions to dismiss the action as to Cuddy.

It is so ordered.

Mr. Justice McWilliams not participating.
Graphic

EXHIBIT 23.3

CONSENT OF SPROULE ASSOCIATES INC.

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements on Form S-8 (Nos. 333-138704 and
333-144878) of the references to our firm, in the context in which they appear, and to our reserve estimates as of January 1, 2006, which are incorporated by reference in the Annual
Report on Form 10-K of Kodiak Oil & Gas Corp. for the year ended December 31, 2007 as well as in the notes to the financial statements included therein.

| |  | Sincerely,                                         
| |  | ---------------------------------------------------
| |  | SPROULE U.S. LIMITED                               
| |  | Harry J. Helwerda, P. Eng.
Executive Vice-President

March 13,
2008

Graphic

---



QuickLinks
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

DAY HIGH

 960

 805

 909

 1,043

 1,048

 1,007

 897

 944

 904

 826

 861

 828

 854

 793

 727

 674

 600

 570

 569

 592

 599

 565

 569

 582

 601

 605

 600

 590

 595

 597

 612

 576

 618

 684

 661

 621

 656

 738

 750

 682

 678

 704

 744

 732

 651

 569

 521

 533

 528

 501

 523

 523

 529

 528

 567

 551

 541

 531

 524

 579

 861

 656

 760

 886

 813

 720

 750

 858

 818

 759

 768

 751

 791

 758

 705

 619

 560

 549

 548

 540

 554

 541

 546

 558

 578

 575

 564

 556

 558

 588

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

APRIL 2012 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: June 5, 2012

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

DELTA MENDOTA CANAL AT CHECK 13 (O'NEILL)
Editorial Note on Part 40
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 40 appear by T.D. ATF-460, 66 FR 39094-39096, July 27, 2001; T.D. ATF-464, 66 FR 43479, Aug. 20, 2001; and T.D. TTB-91, 76 FR 5479, Feb. 1, 2011.

§ 40.522 Reports. ( a ) *General.* Every manufacturer of processed tobacco must prepare a monthly report on TTB F 5250.1 in accordance with the instructions for the form. The report must be prepared at the times specified in this section and must be prepared whether or not any operations or transactions occurred during the period covered by the report. The manufacturer must retain a copy of each report in accordance with the provisions of this subpart.
( b ) *First report(s).* The first monthly report must be submitted by the 20th day of the month following the month in which the permit or authorization is issued. If the manufacturer is operating as a manufacturer of processed tobacco under the transitional rule set forth in § 40.493, the manufacturer must submit the first report by the 20th day of the month following the month in which TTB provides written acknowledgement of the receipt of the application filed under § 40.492. In the transitional case, the manufacturer must also submit reports for all previous months back to April 2009. For example, a manufacturer who receives an acknowledgement, dated July 17, 2009, must submit by August 20, 2009, a total of four reports, one each for April, May, June, and July 2009.
( c ) *Reports of no activity.* Reports with the notation “No Activity” must be made for those months in which no activity occurs.
( d ) *Reports of removals.* ( 1 ) Except as otherwise provided in paragraphs (d)(2) or (d)(3) of this section, a manufacturer who removes processed tobacco for export or for shipment to someone other than a person holding a TTB permit as a manufacturer of processed tobacco, as a manufacturer of tobacco products, as an importer of processed tobacco, or as an export warehouse proprietor must report each such removal on TTB F 5250.2 by the close of the next business day following the day of removal, in accordance with the instructions on the form.
( 2 ) In the case of removals for export, as an alternative to the procedure prescribed in paragraph (d)(1) of this section, the manufacturer may submit to TTB a monthly summary report of such removals in a format approved by the appropriate TTB officer. Prior to the use of such an alternate procedure, the manufacturer must obtain written approval from the appropriate TTB officer.
( 3 ) A manufacturer of tobacco products who removes processed tobacco for any of the purposes related to the manufacture of tobacco products set forth under § 40.72(b)(2) is not required to report such removals on TTB F 5250.2. Records of such removals must still be kept pursuant to § 40.521.
( e ) *Concluding report.* A concluding report, covering the period from the first of the month to the date of the concluding inventory, shall be made with such inventory.
(26 U.S.C. 5722)
[T.D. TTB-78, 74 FR 29410, June 22, 2009, as amended by T.D. TTB-80, 74 FR 37552, July 29, 2009; T.D. TTB-104, 77 FR 37304, June 21, 2012]
#### Jeanette S. Brownrigg, Respondent, v. Leo W. Brownrigg, Appellant.

Motion to resettle order granted upon condition that defendant proceed with the trial of the action when reached upon the present calendar of the Special Term of this court; otherwise, motion denied, with ten dollars costs. Present — Jenks, P. J., Burr, Thomas, Carr and Putnam, JJ.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Transportation

###### Office of the Secretary

The following Agreements were filed with the Department of Transportation under the Sections 412 and 414 of the Federal Aviation Act, as amended (49 U.S.C. 1382 and 1384) and procedures governing proceedings to enforce these provisions. Answers may be filed within 21 days after the filing of the application.

*Docket Number*                     DOT-OST-2011-0069.                

*Date Filed*                     March 30, 2011.                

*Parties*                     Members of the International Air Transport Association.                

*Subject*                     (a) TC23 between Middle East, Africa and TC3 (except South West Pacific) Flex Fares Resolutions, Geneva, 14-15 June 2010 (Memo 0449/0447), TC23 between Middle East, Africa and TC3 (except South West Pacific) Flex Fares, Geneva, 14-15 June 2010 (Memo 0454/0452), TC23 between Middle East, Africa and TC3 (except South West Pacific) Minutes (Memo 0450/0448).                

(b) TC23 Middle East/Africa—TC3 (except South West Pacific) Flex Fare Resolution 111tt, Mail Vote 673 (Memo 0458/0454), Intended Effective Date: 1 April 2011.

Renee V. Wright,

Program Manager, Docket Operations, Federal Register Liaison.

[FR Doc. 2011-9164 Filed 4-14-11; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4910-9X-P
#### In the Matter of the Claim of Anna Boettger et al., Respondents, against Young Men’s Christian Association of Troy, New York, et al., Appellants. State Industrial Board, Respondent.

All concur.
(No. 74-CC-336

#### Mansion View Lodge, Inc., Claimant, *vs.*State of Illinois, Governor’s Office of Human Resources, Respondent.

*Opinion filed May 15, 1974.*

Mansion View Lodge, Inc., Claimant, pro se.

William J. Scott, Attorney General; Howard W. Feldman, Assistant Attorney General, for Respondent.

Per Curiam.
Appendix F: Administrative Unit Maps

National Forests in Mississippi Land and Resource Management Plan

Map 11 – Chickasawhay Geographic Area RCW Habitat Management Area
Appendix F: Administrative Unit Maps

National Forests in Mississippi Land and Resource Management Plan

Map 12 – Chickasawhay Geographic Area Ecological Systems
Appendix F: Administrative Unit Maps

National Forests in Mississippi Land and Resource Management Plan

Map 13 – Chickasawhay Fire Suitability Classification
Appendix F: Administrative Unit Maps

National Forests in Mississippi Land and Resource Management Plan

Map 14 – Chickasawhay Minerals Suitability Classification
Appendix F: Administrative Unit Maps

National Forests in Mississippi Land and Resource Management Plan

Map 15 – Chickasawhay Recreation Suitability Classification
Appendix F: Administrative Unit Maps

National Forests in Mississippi Land and Resource Management Plan

Map 16 – Chickasawhay Geographic Area Special Uses Suitability Classification
Appendix F: Administrative Unit Maps

National Forests in Mississippi Land and Resource Management Plan

Map 17 – Chickasawhay Geographic Area Timber Suitability Classification
Appendix F: Administrative Unit Maps

National Forests in Mississippi Land and Resource Management Plan

Map 18 – Unmanaged Forty Scenic Area, Chickasawhay RD, De Soto NF
Appendix F: Administrative Unit Maps

National Forests in Mississippi Land and Resource Management Plan

Map 18v – Unmanaged Forty Scenic Area Vicinity Map, Chickasawhay RD, De Soto NF
Appendix F: Administrative Unit Maps

National Forests in Mississippi Land and Resource Management Plan

Map 19 – Tiger Creek Botanical Area, Chickasawhay RD, De Soto NF
Appendix F: Administrative Unit Maps

National Forests in Mississippi Land and Resource Management Plan

Map 19v – Tiger Creek Botanical Area Vicinity Map, Chickasawhay RD, De Soto NF
Appendix F: Administrative Unit Maps

National Forests in Mississippi Land and Resource Management Plan

Map 20 – Laurel Oak Botanical Area, Chickasawhay RD, De Soto NF
Appendix F: Administrative Unit Maps

National Forests in Mississippi Land and Resource Management Plan

Map 20v – Laurel Oak Botanical Area Vicinity Map, Chickasawhay RD, De Soto NF