alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
## NO. 12

- 21

- 00167

- CV

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS

TWELFTH COURT OF APPEALS DISTRICT

TYLER, TEXAS

ANDREW WARNER , APP E

LLANT

V.

ERICA NAJERA , APPELLEE §

§

§ APPEAL FROM THE

COUNTY COURT AT LAW

ANDERSON COUNTY, TEXAS

MEMORANDUM OPINION PER CURIAM

T h is appeal is being dismissed for failure to comply with the Texas R ules of App ellate

Procedure. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 42.3. Andrew Warner appeals from a judgment signed on
August 31, 2021

. P ursuant to Rule 32.1, Appellant’ s docketing statement was due to have been filed at the time the appeal was perfected, i.e., Septembe r 30 , 2021

. On October 5 , this C ourt
request ed that Appellant file a dock etin g statement within ten days if he had not already done so. Appellant did not file the docketing statement as r eques ted

. On October 22

, the Clerk of this C ourt issued a second noti ce advising Appellant that the docketing sta tement was past due. The notice fur ther pr ovided that unless the docketing

statement was filed on or before November 1 , the appeal would be pr esented for dismissal in accordance with Texas Rule of Appellate Proce dure 42.3. The date for filing the docketi ng statement has passed, and Appellant has n ot complied with the Court’ s request. Because Appellant failed, after notice, to comply with Rule 3 2.1, the appe al is dismissed

. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 42.3(c) (a fter giving ten days ’ notice

, appellate court may di smiss appeal

because appellant failed to comp ly wit h a requiremen t o f the appellate rules, a court order, or a notice from the clerk requiring a response or other action within a speci fied time )

. Opinion deliver ed November 3 , 2021. Panel consisted of Worth en, C.J., Hoyle, J., and Neeley, J.

## COURT OF APPEALS

TWELFTH COURT OF APPEALS DISTRICT OF TEXAS

JU DGMENT

NOVEMBER 3 , 2021

NO. 12

- 21

- 00167

- CV

ANDREW WARNER , Appellant V. ERICA NAJERA , Appellee

Appeal from the County Court at Law

of Anderson County, Texas (Tr.Ct.No. CCL

- 21

- 17376 )

THIS CAU SE came on to be heard on the appellate re cord, and the sam e being consider ed, it is the opinion of this C ourt th at the ap peal should be dismissed.
It is therefore ORDERED, AD JUDGED a nd DECREED by this Cou rt that this appeal be, and the same is, he reby dism issed ; and that this decision be certifie d to t he court

be low for observance.
By per curiam opinion

. Pane l consisted of Worthen, C.J., Hoyle, J. and Neeley, J.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Railroad Retirement Board

                    Notice is hereby given that the Railroad Retirement Board will hold a                           ( print page 2728)                        meeting on January 19, 2011, 10 a.m. at the Board's meeting room on the 8th floor of its headquarters building, 844 North Rush Street, Chicago, Illinois, 60611. The agenda for this meeting follows:                

#### (1) Executive Committee Reports

The entire meeting will be open to the public. The person to contact for more information is Beatrice Ezerski, Secretary to the Board, Phone No. 312-751-4920.

Dated: January 10, 2011.

Beatrice Ezerski,

Secretary to the Board.

[FR Doc. 2011-864 Filed 1-12-11; 11:15 am]

BILLING CODE 7905-01-P
Editorial Note on Part 70
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 70 appear by T.D. ATF-450, 66 FR 29022-29030, May 29, 2001.

§ 70.1 General. ( a ) The regulations in Subparts C, D, and E of this part set forth the procedural and administrative rules of the Alcohol and Tobacco Tax and Trade Bureau for: ( 1 ) The issuance and enforcement of summonses, examination of books of account and witnesses, administration of oaths, entry of premises for examination of taxable objects, granting of rewards for information, canvass for taxable objects and persons, and authority of TTB officers.
( 2 ) The use of commercial banks for payment of excise taxes imposed by 26 U.S.C. Subtitles E and F.
( 3 ) The preparing or executing of returns; deposits; payment on notice and demand; assessment; abatements, credits and refunds; limitations on assessment; limitations on credit or refund; periods of limitation in judicial proceedings; interest; additions to tax, additional amounts, and assessable penalties; enforced collection activities; authority for establishment, alteration, and distribution of stamps, marks, or labels; jeopardy assessment of alcohol, tobacco, and firearms taxes, registration of dealers in alcohol fit for beverage use, and registration of persons paying a special tax.
( 4 ) Distilled spirits, wines, beer, tobacco products, cigarette papers and tubes, firearms, ammunition, and explosives.
( b ) The regulations in Subpart F of this part relate to the limitations imposed by 26 U.S.C. 6423, on the refund or credit of tax paid or collected in respect to any article of a kind subject to a tax imposed by Part I, Subchapter A of Chapter 51, I.R.C., or by any corresponding provision of prior internal revenue laws.
( c ) The regulations in Subpart G of this part implement 26 U.S.C. 5064, which permits payments to be made by the United States for amounts equal to the internal revenue taxes paid or determined and customs duties paid on distilled spirits, wines, and beer, previously withdrawn, that were lost, made unmarketable, or condemned by a duly authorized official as a result of disaster, vandalism, or malicious mischief. This subpart applies to disasters or other specified causes of loss, occurring on or after February 1, 1979. This subpart does not apply to distilled spirits, wines, and beer manufactured in Puerto Rico and brought into the United States.
[T.D. ATF-376, 61 FR 31031, June 19, 1996, as amended by T.D. TTB-44, 71 FR 16958, Apr. 4, 2006; T.D. TTB-79, 74 FR 37424, July 28, 2009; T.D. TTB-91, 76 FR 5481, Feb. 1, 2011]
§ 10.411 What are the maximum and minimum rates of compensation in death cases? ( a ) Compensation for death may not exceed the employee's pay or 75 percent of the basic monthly pay of the highest step of grade 15 of the General Schedule, except that compensation may exceed the employee's basic monthly pay if such excess is created by authorized cost-of-living increases. (Basic monthly pay does not include locality adjustments.) However, the maximum limit does not apply when the death occurred during an assassination of a Federal official described under 18 U.S.C. 351(a) or 18 U.S.C. 1751(a).
( b ) Compensation for death is computed on a minimum pay rate equal to the basic monthly pay of an employee at the first step of grade 2 of the General Schedule. (Basic monthly pay does not include locality adjustments.)
### SUBCHAPTER II—ESTABLISHMENT OF THE DEPARTMENT
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY HIGH

 10,527

 14,861

 18,324

 16,233

 13,896

 11,510

 9,952

 8,683

 8,444

 8,052

 7,230

 5,971

 5,261

 5,636

 6,665

 7,234

 7,302

 7,171

 7,967

 8,193

 6,992

 8,103

 8,186

 8,359

 7,639

 7,108

 6,851

 6,201

 6,395

 19,636

 24,122

 4,937

 5,970

 6,657

 5,943

 7,192

 3,753

 3,123

 2,316

 2,245

 2,213

 2,583

 2,247

 2,061

 2,340

 2,664

 3,198

 3,222

 3,036

 3,244

 3,176

 2,774

 2,480

 3,050

 2,762

 2,704

 2,822

 2,373

 2,537

 2,802

 2,036

 10,139

 6,710

 10,163

 11,856

 11,081

 10,034

 7,781

 6,265

 5,491

 5,274

 5,092

 5,027

 4,369

 3,845

 4,130

 4,627

 5,052

 5,021

 5,148

 5,505

 5,708

 5,214

 5,293

 5,588

 5,495

 5,208

 5,296

 4,906

 4,800

 4,742

 9,307

 16,200

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

MAY 2008 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: June 3, 2008

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

PORT CHICAGO BOTTOM IN SUISUN BAY
STATE OF IDAHO DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY

1410 North Hilton • Boise, Idaho 83706 • (208) 373-0502 October 18, 2013

Dennis McLerran Regional Administrator U.S. EPA Region 10 1200 Sixth Avenue Seattle WA 98101 DearMr. McLerran, 

### RECEIVED ON: 

## uL I 

## t. il 

## 2013

EPA Region 10 Office ofthe Regional Administrator C.L. "Butch" Otter, Governor Curt Fransen, Director

This letter is writtento provide EPA assurancethatthe Idaho Department ofEnvironmental Quality (DEQ) does not intend to apply federal regulations that have been vacatedby the D.C. CircuitCourt ofAppeals. Specifically, as a result ofthe decision in Sierra Club v. EPA, 705 F.3d 458, Idaho confirms that it will not apply eitherthe PM2.5 significant impact levels (SILs) provision at 40 CFR 52.21(k)(2) orthe PM2.5 significant monitoring concentration (SMC) provisions at40 CFR 52.21(i)(5)(i)(c). The PM2.5 SILs and SMC provisions were adopted by reference at IDAPA 58.01.01.107.03.c. DEQ intends to remove theprovisions to ensure consistency with federal law as soon as practicable. Ifyou have any questions or require additional information, please contact Tiffany Floyd at (208)373-0552. Thank you for your attention inthis matter. Sincerely,

CurtFransen Director CAF:tc c: Tiffany Floyd, Idaho DEQ Air Quality Administrator Lisa J Carlson, Deputy Attorney General Mike Simon, Idaho DEQ Stationary Source Program Manager

Pr1n/ed 011 Racycloa Paper
(No. 5760

#### Texaco, Inc., Claimant, *vs.*State of Illinois, Respondent.

*Opinion filed November 3, 1972.*

Texaco, Inc., Claimant, pro se.

William J. Scott, Attorney General; William E. Webber, Assistant Attorney General, for Respondent.

Per Curiam.

*107This cause coming on to be heard on the Joint Stipulation of the parties hereto and the Court being fully advised in the premises;

THIS COURT FINDS that this claim is for gasoline and petroleum products and services for State-owned vehicles for various departments as follows:

Liquor Control Commission NIL

Department of Law Enforcement $4,565.49

Department of Conservation 154.93

Department of Public Health 22.00

Department of Agriculture 154.38

Department of Revenue 39.24

Department of Public Works & Buildings (Now Transportation) 1,712.23

Department of Mental Health 7.79

Department of Children & Family Services 26.36

Department of Corrections 14.59

Legislative Investigating Commission 8.83

Illinois Veterans’ Commission 7.74

Illinois State Scholarship Commission 12.63

Secretary of State 176.98

Attorney General 9.82

for a total sum of $6,913.01 in full satisfaction of any and all claims presented to the State of Illinois under the above-captioned cause.
---

---

Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
RULE 13a-14(b) UNDER THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
AND 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the quarterly
report of Ampal-American Israel Corporation (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the
period ending March 31, 2009, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the
date hereof (the Report), each of the undersigned executive officers of the
Company certifies, to the best of such executive officers knowledge, pursuant to
Rule 13a-14(b) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
               Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
| | --- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
               respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

| | /s/ Yosef A. Maiman 
Yosef A. Maiman Chairman of the Board, President and CEOAmpal-American Israel CorporationMay 6, 2009 | /s/ Irit Eluz
Irit EluzCFO and Senior Vice President Finance and TreasurerAmpal-American Israel Corporation May 6, 2009
| | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

A signed original of this written
statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or
otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version
of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to the Company and
will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or
its staff upon request.



---

---
Exhibit 15.4
   
  LINKTONE LTD.
 Company
   /s/ Jun He Law Offices
---



April 21, 2015

Dejour Energy Inc. 598-999 Canada Place Vancouver,
BCV6C 3E1

Consent of Independent Petroleum Engineers

We hereby consent to the use and reference to our name and
reports evaluating a portion of Dejour Energy Inc.s petroleum and natural gas
reserves as of December 31, 2014, and the information derived from our reports,
as described or incorporated by reference in: (i) Dejour Energy Inc.s Annual
Report on Form 20-F for the year ended December 31, 2014, (ii) Dejour Energy
Inc.s Registration Statement on Form F-3 (File No. 333-183587), and (iii)
Dejour Energy Inc.s Registration Statements on Form S-8 (Files No.
333-179540 and 333-156772), filed with the United States Securities and
Exchange Commission.

Sincerely,

Letha C. Lencioni, P.E.
  GUSTAVSON ASSOCIATES, LLC.
Vice-President, Petroleum Engineering

5757 Central Ave. Suite D Boulder, Co. 80301 USA 1-303-443-2209
FAX 1-303-443-3156 http://www.gustavson.com

---
###### Editorial Note on Part 41

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 41 (formerly part 275) appear at T.D. ATF-460, 66 FR 39093, July 27, 2001.

#### § 41.239 Notice of contemplated disapproval.

If the appropriate TTB officer has reason to believe that the applicant is not entitled to a permit, the appropriate TTB officer will promptly give to the applicant notice of the contemplated disapproval of the application and opportunity for hearing thereon in accordance with part 71 of this chapter. If, after such notice and opportunity for hearing, the appropriate TTB officer finds that the applicant is not entitled to a permit, an order will be prepared stating the findings on which the application is denied.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY ELEV

 123.06

 123.04

 122.67

 121.92

 122.15

 122.95

 123.53

 123.43

 123.23

 124.43

 122.88

 121.79

 121.97

 121.80

 122.17

 122.37

 121.98

 121.74

 121.47

 123.33

 122.30

 122.81

 122.38

 123.10

 123.69

 123.00

 123.47

 124.03

 122.78

 122.90

 123.28

 7,819

 7,810

 7,643

 7,307

 7,409

 7,769

 8,040

 7,993

 7,899

 8,476

 7,737

 7,253

 7,328

 7,257

 7,418

 7,508

 7,333

 7,232

 7,118

 7,946

 7,476

 7,706

 7,512

 7,838

 8,115

 7,791

 8,012

 8,276

 7,692

 7,746

 7,923

STORAGE

-165

-9

-167

-336

+102

+360

+271

-47

-94

+577

-739

-484

+75

-71

+161

+90

-175

-101

-114

+828

-470

+230

-194

+326

+277

-324

+221

+264

-584

+54

+177

CHANGE

1,117

1,255

1,316

1,232

1,445

1,572

1,525

1,381

1,355

1,684

2,097

3,288

5,011

10,138

25,264

31,838

29,147

28,785

25,613

21,458

17,106

14,167

11,901

10,470

9,245

7,802

7,182

6,452

5,340

5,418

5,369

INFLOW

 1,094

 1,153

 1,294

 1,296

 1,289

 1,286

 1,283

 1,300

 1,297

 1,299

 2,384

 1,178

 2

 2

 5

 8

 8

 7

 788

 4,460

 5,034

 5,022

 4,872

 3,380

 4,568

 4,749

 4,659

 4,636

 4,678

 4,685

 4,681

POWER

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 2,269

 4,886

 10,087

 25,093

 31,700

 29,141

 28,743

 24,797

 16,496

 12,224

 8,944

 7,042

 6,841

 4,439

 3,090

 2,299

 1,590

 871

 620

 510

SPILL

 85

 85

 85

 85

 85

 85

 85

 85

 85

 85

 85

 85

 85

 85

 85

 85

 85

 85

 85

 85

 85

 85

 85

 85

 85

 85

 85

 85

 85

 85

 85

HATCHERY

 1

 2

 1

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 1

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 1

 1

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 1

 1

 1

 0

 1

 0

C.F.S.

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

DECEMBER 2016 LAKE NATOMA DAILY OPERATIONS RUN DATE: January 1, 2017

IN LAKE

EVAP

C.F.S.

COMPUTED*

ACRE-FEET

RELEASE - C.F.S.

TOTALS -61 296,973 72,397 221,682 2,635 11

ACRE-FEET -61 589,046 143,599 439,706 5,227 22

COMMENTS:

* COMPUTED INFLOW IS THE SUM OF CHANGE IN STORAGE, RELEASES AND EVAPORATION.

SUMMARY

RELEASES (ACRE-FEET)

POWER 143,599

SPILL 439,706

FOLSOM SOUTH CANAL

HATCHERY

 555

 5,227

 7,984

FOLSOM

SOUTH 

CANAL

 20

 20

 20

 20

 20

 20

 20

 20

 20

 9

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 13

 40

 27

 7

 0

 0

 4

 280

 555

(1)

(1) INCHES OF EVAPORATION TAKEN FROM FOLSOM PAN.

RELEASES (ACRE-FEET)

TOTAL 589,087
Converted by EDGARwiz


LEASE AGREEMENT

This lease agreement is between Vodka Brands, Corp. a Pennsylvania corporation ( the “Company”) and Jason Valenti (“Landlord”). This agreement is effective on September 23, 2014 (the “Effective Date”).

I. PROPERTY



Landlord hereby grants the Company the right to use up to 600 square feet of storage space located at 8179 Stubenville Pike Imperial PA 15126.  The Tenant agrees to use the office purely for storage of its products.  The Property is rented “as is”.




II. TERM




This agreement shall have a term (the “Term”) of 12 months commencing on the Effective Date. 




III. COMPENSATION




The Tenant shall pay the Landlord 20,000 shares of its restricted common stock (the “Rent”) in exchange for the use of the property during the Term. 



IV.TERMINATION




In the event the parties agree to terminate this lease agreement, all Rent set forth in this agreement will be deemed fully earned and non-refundable. 




V. GENERAL




This agreement shall be construed under and in accordance with the laws of the State of Florida. The Landlord is not hired to be involved in any financing or promotional activities. The parties covenant and agree that they will execute such other and further instruments and documents as are or may become necessary or convenient to effectuate and carry out the obligations of the parties in accordance with this agreement.   This agreement shall be binding upon and inure to the benefit of the parties and their respective heirs, executors, administrators, legal representatives, successors, and assigns where permitted by this agreement.  This agreement supersedes any prior understandings or oral agreements between the parties respecting the subject matter contained in this agreement. All agreements, warranties, representations, and indemnifications contained in this agreement above shall survive the termination of this consulting agreement.







For Landlord:

Vodka Brands, Corp.




By:/s/ Jason Valenti

By: Mark Lucero

Jason, Valenti, Landlord 

Chief Executive Officer
#### Edna M. Brundige, an Infant, etc., Appellant, v. Joseph J. Fienberg, Respondent, Impleaded, etc.

Motion for reargument denied, with ten dollars costs. Motion for leave to appeal to Court of Appeals denied.
### part 1—definitions
§ 10.740 In what situations will OWCP automatically presume that a law enforcement officer is covered by the FECA? ( a ) Where an officer is detailed by a competent State or local authority to assist a Federal law enforcement authority in the protection of the President of the United States, or any other person actually provided or entitled to U.S. Secret Service protection, coverage will be extended.
( b ) Coverage for officers of the U.S. Park Police and those officers of the Uniformed Division of the U.S. Secret Service who participate in the District of Columbia Retirement System is adjudicated under the principles set forth in paragraph (a) of this section, and does not extend to numerous tangential activities of law enforcement (for example, reporting to work, changing clothes). However, officers of the Non-Uniformed Division of the U.S. Secret Service who participate in the District of Columbia Retirement System are covered under the FECA during the performance of all official duties.
EXHIBIT 3.25
 STATE OF MISSOURI
  
   Farmington Hospital Corporation
   th
  /s/ Robin Carnahan

Robin Carnahan, Secretary of State




---



##### 



ARTICLES OF INCORPORATION
 OF
 FARMINGTON HOSPITAL CORPORATION




---



##### 



Rights to Indemnification
 Right of Indemnitee to Bring Suit




---



##### 



Non-Exclusivity of Rights
 Insurance
 Indemnity of Employees and Agents of the Corporation
   /s/  Robin J. KeckRobin J. KeckIncorporator 
 27th
 /s/ Sherry A. Connelly

Notary Public(SEAL)My commission expires: 12/9/08
 File Number: 20061211161800735137Date Filed 04/28/2006Robin CarnahanSecretary of State
#### § 771.100 Unavailability of administrative law judge.

In the event that the administrative law judge designated to conduct a hearing becomes unavailable before the filing of his findings and recommended decision, the Director may assign the case to another administrative law judge for the continuance of the proceeding, in accordance with the regulations in this part in the same manner as if he had been designated administrative law judge at the commencement of the proceeding.
Exhibit 99.15

                       GE CAPITAL MORTGAGE SERVICES, INC.
            OFFICERS' ANNUAL COMPLIANCE CERTIFICATE - SERIES 1999-15A

         The undersigned,  Vice Presidents of GE Capital Mortgage Services, Inc.
(the "Servicer"), pursuant to the Pooling and Servicing Agreement for the Series
1999-15A REMIC Multi-Class Mortgage Pass-Through  Certificates (the "Agreement")
entered into by GE Capital Mortgage Services,  Inc., as Seller and Servicer, and
State Street Bank and Trust Company,  as Trustee,  which  Agreement  requires an
annual  statement of  compliance  to be made to the Trustee by an officer of the
Servicer, hereby state that:

         (i)      a  review  of  the  activities  of  the  Servicer  during  the
                  preceding  calendar  year  and of its  performance  under  the
                  Agreement  has  been  made  under  the  undersigned  officers'
                  supervision; and

         (ii)     to the best of the undersigned  officers' knowledge,  based on
                  such review,  the Servicer has  fulfilled  all of its material
                  obligations  under the Agreement  throughout such year, except
                  as set forth on Exhibit A hereto.

Capitalized  terms used  herein but not  defined  herein  shall have the meaning
given to them in the Agreement.

Dated:            March 24, 2000

By:      /s/ Gregory A. Gibson
------------------------------
         Gregory A. Gibson
         Senior Vice President

By:      /s/ Tim Neer
------------------------------
         Tim Neer
         Vice President

<PAGE>

                                    EXHIBIT A





                                      None