alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY

 4,952

 5,097

 5,197

 5,312

 5,417

 5,524

 5,627

 5,749

 5,858

 5,976

 6,058

 6,152

 6,272

 6,384

 6,492

 6,492

 4,941

 5,018

 5,171

 5,294

 5,408

 5,533

 5,493

 5,316

 5,442

 5,567

 5,654

 5,758

 5,767

 5,710

 5,823

 19,700

 19,446

 19,193

 18,940

 18,688

 18,449

 18,218

 17,987

 17,743

 17,554

 17,433

 17,210

 16,962

 16,698

 16,450

 16,383

 17,634

 17,378

 17,134

 16,887

 16,647

 16,408

 16,336

 16,483

 16,294

 16,097

 15,845

 15,614

 15,446

 15,299

 15,051

STORAGE - A.F. 

 24,652

 24,543

 24,390

 24,252

 24,105

 23,973

 23,845

 23,736

 23,601

 23,530

 23,491

 23,362

 23,234

 23,082

 22,942

 22,875

 22,575

 22,396

 22,305

 22,181

 22,055

 21,941

 21,829

 21,799

 21,736

 21,664

 21,499

 21,372

 21,213

 21,009

 20,874

285

389

487

360

413

189

415

622

336

1,012

687

525

308

391

374

401

438

269

393

296

373

471

680

837

839

599

342

502

471

618

285

166

334

410

290

339

122

350

567

268

976

667

460

243

314

303

367

287

179

347

233

309

414

624

822

807

563

259

438

391

515

217

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

JANUARY 2001 FULL NATURAL FLOW AT NEW MELONES DAM RUN DATE: 02/13/2001

TOTALS -4,014 12,581

* October 1, 24,954

 91.5

 92.2

 93.0

 93.6

 94.3

 94.5

 95.2

 96.3

 96.9

 98.8

 100.1

 101.0

 101.5

 102.1

 102.7

 103.5

 104.0

 104.4

 105.1

 105.5

 106.1

 107.0

 108.2

 109.8

 111.4

 112.6

 113.1

 113.9

 114.7

 115.7

 116.2

DONNELLS

RES

BEARDSLEY

RES

2000 TO DATE

NEW

MELONES

INFLOW

C.F.S

NATURAL

RIVER

C.F.S

ACCUM *

FULL

NATURAL

1000 A.F.

RESERVOIR

TOTAL

-236

-109

-153

-138

-147

-132

-128

-109

-135

-71

-39

-129

-128

-152

-140

-67

-300

-179

-91

-124

-126

-114

-112

-30

-63

-72

-165

-127

-159

-204

-135

CHANGE

A.F. C.F.S.

-119

-55

-77

-70

-74

-67

-65

-55

-68

-36

-20

-65

-65

-77

-71

-34

-151

-90

-46

-63

-64

-57

-56

-15

-32

-36

-83

-64

-80

-103

-68
#### § 1002.40 Does USERRA protect against discrimination in initial hiring decisions?

Yes. The Act's definition of employer includes a person, institution, organization, or other entity that has denied initial employment to an individual in violation of USERRA's anti-discrimination provisions. An employer need not actually employ an individual to be his or her “employer” under the Act, if it has denied initial employment on the basis of the individual's membership, application for membership, performance of service, application for service, or obligation for service in the uniformed services. Similarly, the employer would be liable if it denied initial employment on the basis of the individual's action taken to enforce a protection afforded to any person under USERRA, his or her testimony or statement in connection with any USERRA proceeding, assistance or other participation in a USERRA investigation, or the exercise of any other right provided by the Act. For example, if the individual has been denied initial employment because of his or her obligations as a member of the National Guard or Reserves, the company or entity denying employment is an employer for purposes of USERRA. Similarly, if an entity withdraws an offer of employment because the individual is called upon to fulfill an obligation in the uniformed services, the entity withdrawing the employment offer is an employer for purposes of USERRA.
###### Editorial Note on Part 26

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 26 appear by T.D. ATF-451, 66 FR 21668, 21669, May 1, 2001.

#### § 26.260 Required information.

Persons (except tourists) bringing liquors from the Virgin Islands into the United States must file with U.S. Customs and Border Protection, at the time of filing the entry or entry summary, as appropriate, the information required under § 26.200, in accordance with that section, and provide any information collected by any gauge under § 26.204 and any information contained in the certificate described in § 26.205, upon request, in accordance with the provisions of §§ 26.204 and 26.205(c).

[T.D. TTB-145, 81 FR 94201, Dec. 22, 2016]
###### Editorial Note on Part 44

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 44 appear by T.D. ATF-464, 66 FR 43480, Aug. 20, 2001, and T.D. ATF-480, 67 FR 30801-30803, May 8, 2002.

#### § 44.183 Indecent or immoral material.

No indecent or immoral picture, print, or representation shall be contained in, attached to, or stamped, marked, written, or printed on any package of tobacco products, or cigarette papers or tubes.

(72 Stat. 1422; 26 U.S.C. 5723)

[T.D. 6871, 31 FR 51, Jan. 4, 1966. Redesignated at 40 FR 16835, Apr. 15, 1975, and amended by T.D. ATF-232, 51 FR 28088, Aug. 5, 1986; T.D. ATF-243, 51 FR 43194, Dec. 1, 1986]
Editorial Note on Part 70
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 70 appear by T.D. ATF-450, 66 FR 29022-29030, May 29, 2001.

§ 70.504 Conditions to allowance of credit or refund. No credit or refund to which this subpart is applicable shall be allowed or made, pursuant to a court decision or otherwise, of any amount paid or collected as a tax unless a claim therefor has been filed, as provided in this subpart, by the person who paid the tax and the claimant, in addition to establishing that such claimant is otherwise legally entitled to credit or refund of the amount claimed, establishes: ( a ) That the claimant bore the ultimate burden of the amount claimed, or
( b ) That the claimant has unconditionally repaid the amount claimed to the person who bore the ultimate burden of such amount, or
( c ) That: ( 1 ) The owner of the article furnished the claimant the amount claimed for payment of the tax;
( 2 ) The claimant has filed with the appropriate TTB officer the written consent of such owner to the allowance to the claimant of the credit or refund; and
( 3 ) Such owner satisfies the requirements of paragraph (a) or (b) of this section.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

MIDDLE DISTRICT

**COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,**

**Respondent**

**v.**

**JERET SAMUEL HARVEY,**

**Petitioner :** 

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**: No. 817 MAL 2015** 

**Petition for Allowance of Appeal from the Order of the Superior Court** 

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW **, this 30th day of March, 2016, the Petition for Allo wance of Appeal is** 

DENIED

**.**
### **CHAPTER 6—NARCOTIC DRUGS**

#### **Executive Documents**

#### Executive Order No. 10302

Ex. Ord. No. 10302, Nov. 5, 1951, 16 F.R. 11257, formerly set out as a note preceding section 171, which established the Interdepartmental Committee on Narcotics, was revoked by Ex. Ord. No. 11529, Apr. 24, 1970, 35 F.R. 6697.
### §1522. Purposes

The purposes of this subchapter are—

(1) to reduce substance use and misuse among youth in communities throughout the United States, and over time, to reduce substance use and misuse among adults;

(2) to strengthen collaboration among communities, the Federal Government, and State, local, and tribal governments;

(3) to enhance intergovernmental cooperation and coordination on the issue of substance use and misuse among youth;

(4) to serve as a catalyst for increased citizen participation and greater collaboration among all sectors and organizations of a community that first demonstrates a long-term commitment to reducing substance use and misuse among youth;

(5) to rechannel resources from the fiscal year 1998 Federal drug control budget to provide technical assistance, guidance, and financial support to communities that demonstrate a long-term commitment in reducing substance use and misuse among youth;

(6) to disseminate to communities timely information regarding the state-of-the-art practices and initiatives that have proven to be effective in reducing substance use and misuse among youth;

(7) to enhance, not supplant, local community initiatives for reducing substance use and misuse among youth; and

(8) to encourage the creation of and support for community anti-drug coalitions throughout the United States.

(Pub. L. 100–690, title I, §1022, as added Pub. L. 105–20, §2(a)(2), June 27, 1997, 111 Stat. 225; amended Pub. L. 115–271, title VIII, §8203(b)(1), Oct. 24, 2018, 132 Stat. 4111; Pub. L. 116–74, §2(c)(1)(A)(ii)(II), Nov. 27, 2019, 133 Stat. 1157.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

2019—Pub. L. 116–74, §2(c)(1)(A)(ii)(II), made technical amendment to directory language of Pub. L. 115–271, §8203(b)(1). See 2018 Amendment note below.

2018—Pub. L. 115–271, §8203(b)(1), as amended by Pub. L. 116–74, §2(c)(1)(A)(ii)(II), substituted "substance use and misuse" for "substance abuse" wherever appearing.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date of 2019 Amendment

Pub. L. 116–74, §2(c)(2), Nov. 27, 2019, 133 Stat. 1158, provided that: "The amendments made by this subsection [amending this section, sections 1506, 1523, 1524, 1531 to 1533, 1535, 1541 to 1548, and 1705 of this title, and provisions set out as notes under sections 1521, 1524, and 1532 of this title] shall take effect as if included in the enactment of the Substance Abuse Prevention Act of 2018 (subtitle K of title VIII of Public Law 115–271) [see Tables for classification]."
### §957a. Omitted

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section, Pub. L. 98–146, title II, Nov. 4, 1983, 97 Stat. 949, which directed that persons serving on National Council on the Humanities continue until their successors are qualified for office, was omitted as superseded. See section 957(c) of this title, as amended by Pub. L. 98–306. Similar provisions were contained in Pub. L. 97–394, title II, Dec. 30, 1982, 96 Stat. 1994.
Editorial Note on Part 70
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 70 appear by T.D. ATF-450, 66 FR 29022-29030, May 29, 2001.

§ 70.81 Notice and demand for tax. ( a ) *General rule.* Where it is not otherwise provided by provisions of 26 U.S.C. enforced and administered by the Bureau, the appropriate TTB officer shall, after the making of an assessment of a tax pursuant to § 70.71 of this part, give notice to each person liable for the unpaid tax, stating the basis for the tax due, the amount of tax, interest, additional amounts, additions to the tax and assessable penalties, and demanding payment thereof. Such notice shall be given as soon as possible and within 60 days. However, the failure to give notice within 60 days does not invalidate the notice. Such notice shall be left at the dwelling or usual place of business of such person, or shall be sent by mail to such person's last known address.
( b ) *Assessment prior to last date for payment.* If any tax is assessed prior to the last date prescribed for payment of such tax, demand that such tax be paid will not be made before such last date, except where it is believed collection would be jeopardized by delay.
(26 U.S.C. 6303 and 7521)
[T.D. ATF-301, 55 FR 47613, Nov. 14, 1990]
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 9

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1999
<CASH>                                           7,949
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                               0
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                 1,350
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                     92,471
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                           8,836
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                             8,818
<LOANS>                                        164,102
<ALLOWANCE>                                      2,935
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 287,497
<DEPOSITS>                                     228,352
<SHORT-TERM>                                    24,185
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                              1,475
<LONG-TERM>                                      7,682
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         2,803
<OTHER-SE>                                      23,000
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>                 287,497
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                  7,295
<INTEREST-INVEST>                                3,157
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                   123
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                                10,575
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                               4,139
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               4,737
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                            5,838
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                      403
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                   0
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                  4,130
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  1,990
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                       1,505
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     1,505
<EPS-BASIC>                                       0.54
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.53
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    4.10
<LOANS-NON>                                        599
<LOANS-PAST>                                        62
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                     0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                      0
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                 3,033
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                      600
<RECOVERIES>                                        99
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                                2,935
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                             2,935
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                          1,208


</TABLE>
-       - Superintendent of Documents
      - 2023-09-01T21:40:22-0400
      - Government Publishing Office, Washington, DC 20401
      - Government Publishing Office
      - Government Publishing Office attests that this document has not been altered since it was disseminated by Government Publishing Office
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

DAY ELEV

 1,900.66

 1,900.98

 1,901.18

 1,901.26

 1,901.40

 1,901.32

 1,901.15

 1,901.33

 1,901.50

 1,900.79

 1,901.02

 1,901.29

 1,901.43

 1,901.65

 1,900.95

 1,900.91

 1,900.60

 1,901.11

 1,901.36

 1,901.01

 1,900.90

 1,900.95

 1,901.41

 1,901.25

 1,901.74

 1,901.34

 1,901.20

 1,900.98

 1,900.98

 1,901.33

 13,661

 13,896

 14,046

 14,105

 14,210

 14,150

 14,023

 14,158

 14,285

 13,756

 13,926

 14,128

 14,233

 14,397

 13,874

 13,845

 13,617

 13,993

 14,180

 13,918

 13,837

 13,874

 14,218

 14,098

 14,465

 14,165

 14,061

 13,896

 13,896

 14,158

STORAGE

+52

+235

+150

+59

+105

-60

-127

+135

+127

-529

+170

+202

+105

+164

-523

-29

-228

+376

+187

-262

-81

+37

+344

-120

+367

-300

-104

-165

+0

+262

CHANGE

2,883

2,429

2,511

2,539

2,490

2,486

2,535

2,843

2,450

2,439

2,893

2,570

2,523

2,263

1,891

1,649

1,106

1,861

1,708

1,082

1,624

2,065

1,818

1,659

1,831

1,471

1,430

1,806

2,389

1,620

INFLOW

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

POWER

 325

 325

 325

 325

 325

 325

 325

 325

 325

 325

 325

 325

 325

 325

 325

 325

 325

 325

 325

 325

 325

 325

 325

 325

 325

 325

 325

 325

 325

 325

SPILL

 125

 125

 125

 125

 125

 125

 125

 125

 125

 125

 125

 125

 125

 125

 125

 125

 125

 125

 125

 125

 125

 125

 125

 125

 125

 125

 125

 125

 125

 125

OUTLETS

 6

 5

 6

 6

 6

 6

 5

 7

 7

 5

 5

 1

 2

 4

 4

 4

 4

 4

 5

 4

 5

 5

 4

 4

 0

 2

 2

 3

 3

 4

C.F.S.

 .26

 .25

 .29

 .26

 .26

 .28

 .23

 .34

 .32

 .23

 .25

 .05

 .11

 .15

 .20

 .19

 .20

 .20

 .23

 .20

 .23

 .23

 .20

 .20

 .00

 .10

 .09

 .13

 .09

 .16

INCHES

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

SEPTEMBER 2001 LEWISTON LAKE DAILY OPERATIONS RUN DATE: October 26, 2001

IN LAKE

EVAPORATION

C.F.S. FRANCIS CARR

COMPUTED*

ACRE-FEET

RELEASE - C.F.S. 

TOTALS +549 62,864 0 3,750 9,750 128 5.93

ACRE-FEET +549 124,691 0 7,438 19,339 254

* COMPUTED INFLOW IS THE SUM OF CHANGE IN STORAGE, RELEASES AND EVAPORATION.

(1) OUTLET RELEASE INCLUDES THE CONTINUOUS FISH RELEASE OF 75 C.F.S.

(2) INCHES OF EVAPORATION TAKEN FROM PAN AT TRINITY RIVER HATCHERY

SUMMARY

RELEASE (ACRE-FEET)

TOTAL POWER 0

TOTAL RIVER 26,777 123,885

 13,609

 97,108

RIVER

JUDGE FRANCIS CARR POWERPLANT

TOTAL RELEASE

JUDGE (2)

(1) POWERPLANT

 2,401

 1,856

 1,979

 2,053

 1,981

 2,060

 2,144

 2,318

 1,929

 2,251

 2,352

 2,017

 2,018

 1,726

 1,701

 1,210

 767

 1,217

 1,159

 760

 1,210

 1,591

 1,191

 1,265

 1,196

 1,170

 1,030

 1,436

 1,936

 1,034

 48,958

 97,108

Table 6
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY HIGH

 16,961

 8,039

 2,948

 1,149

 2,175

 5,228

 6,952

 5,064

 5,925

 3,512

 3,902

 1,136

 842

 5,494

 11,839

 13,124

 14,133

 12,872

 12,239

 12,871

 11,272

 10,466

 10,212

 10,268

 8,116

 6,776

 9,120

 10,199

 13,906

 18,135

 16,208

 778

 359

 338

 348

 322

 316

 318

 303

 291

 267

 265

 267

 246

 240

 249

 292

 494

 571

 560

 882

 723

 878

 799

 801

 998

 883

 891

 1,541

 2,217

 2,196

 1,262

 5,955

 2,382

 788

 472

 508

 962

 1,375

 1,146

 1,287

 724

 787

 390

 362

 1,564

 3,205

 4,240

 5,204

 5,393

 5,071

 5,536

 5,032

 4,639

 4,447

 4,801

 4,057

 3,651

 4,801

 4,891

 6,084

 8,863

 7,989

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

JANUARY 2004 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: February 4, 2004

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

PORT CHICAGO BOTTOM IN SUISUN BAY
#### Tyrone FLETCHER, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. ALLSTATE INSURANCE COMPANY, Defendant-Appellee.

No. 04-30964.

Conference Calendar.

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.

Decided Feb. 23, 2006.

Tyrone Fletcher, Kinder, LA, pro se.

Before GARZA, DENNIS, and PRADO, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: *

Tyrone Fletcher, Louisiana prisoner # 396381, has filed an application for leave to proceed in forma pauperis (IFP) on appeal, following the dismissal of his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint and the district court’s certification that the appeal is not taken in good faith. Fletcher focuses solely on his indigency. By failing to direct his motion to the district court’s reasons for the certification decision, Fletcher has effectively abandoned the only issue that is properly before this court. *See Baugh v. Taylor,*117 F.3d 197, 202 (5th Cir.1997); *Yohey v. Collins,*985 F.2d 222, 224-25 (5th Cir.1993). Accordingly, Fletcher’s request for IFP status is denied, and his appeal is *622dismissed as frivolous. *See Baugh,*117 F.3d at 202 *&*n. 24; 5th Cir. R. 42.2.

The dismissal of this appeal as frivolous and the district court’s dismissal of the complaint for failure to state a claim each count as a strike for purposes of 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g). *See Adepegba v. Hammons,*103 F.3d 383, 388 (5th Cir.1996); 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)(i). Fletcher is warned that if he accumulates three strikes, he will not be permitted to proceed IFP in any civil action or appeal filed while he is incarcerated or detained in any facility unless he is under imminent danger of serious physical injury. *See*28 U.S.C. § 1915(g).

IFP DENIED; APPEAL DISMISSED AS FRIVOLOUS; SANCTION WARNING ISSUED.

*

 Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.
<PAGE>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 99.1

                    CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
                                   PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

         In connection with the Annual Report of Advanced Biotherapy, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-KSB for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2002, as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Periodic
Report"), I, Edmond F. Buccellato, President and Chief Executive Officer of the
Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

1.       the Periodic Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
         13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2.       the information contained in the Periodic Report fairly presents, in
         all material respects, the financial condition and results of
         operations of the Company.

Dated: March 26, 2003                       /s/Edmond F. Buccellato
                                            ------------------------------------
                                            Edmond F. Buccellato, President and
                                            Chief Executive Officer
ARIZONA MINING ASSOCIATION 916 W. Adams, Suite 2 Phoenix, AZ 85007 (602) 266-4416

Comments on the Treatment of Data influence 

### by Exceptional Event (Proposed Rule) My name is Duane Yantorno I am the Corporate Manager of State and Federal Regulatory Affairs for Asarco LLC

. I am also the Chair of the Arizona Mining Associations Air Quality Subcommittee. I am here today representing the Arizona Mining Association, Air Quality Subcommittee which represents 23 active hard rock mining companies and 12 active hard rock mines in the State of Arizona. I would like to thank EPA for the opportunity to comment on today's proposed rule, and to thank you for addressing some of the issues in this proposed rule that the State of Arizona had identified

. As you know, how EPA deals with the air quality data influenced by exceptional events is an important issue for the arid southwest because many high monitored levels are due to exceptional events
. In Arizona, we have experienced how windblown dust can affect monitored values

. For example, the Nation has seen the Haboobs that have engulfed our communities on the news each night

. Furthermore, the importance of a streamlined Exceptional Events rule is magnified because so much of the ozone monitored in Arizona is due to exceptional events. Thus, the state will need to make frequent use of this rule and the Draft Guidance in the preparation of Exceptional Events Demonstrations for Wildfire E vents that may influence Ozone concentrations. This rule and the related Wildfire Guidance are extensive in nature and in order to do their review justice and provide EPA with meaningful comments the Arizona Mining Association is requesting an extension of the comment period. Thanks you for your time.

Web: www.azmining.org Twitter: @azmining FB: Arizona MiningAssociation