alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
### §225. Fund for education of Iranian students in United States

There is authorized to be appropriated, out of any funds in the Treasury of the United States not otherwise appropriated, the sum of $110,000, which sum shall be expended by the Secretary of State in his discretion for the education of Iranian students in the United States, in accordance with the obligation of the United States arising out of the agreement contained in an exchange of notes between this Government and the Iranian Government of July 25, July 29, November 9, and November 15, 1924, which agreement settled a claim asserted by the United States.

The said sum of $110,000 shall be deemed a trust fund received by the Secretary of State under the provisions of section 2668a of title 22, and shall be expended as therein provided. The said sum shall be deemed to constitute the fund of $110,000 received by the United States from the Iranian Government in four installments between December 24, 1924, and March 29, 1925, pursuant to the afore-mentioned notes, and deposited in the Treasury of the United States on June 24, 1925, which fund shall be deemed, insofar as the same may be necessary, to have been heretofore appropriated as a trust fund under section 2668a of title 22 and sections 1321 and 1322(a) of title 31. The Secretary of the Treasury shall make payments out of the said fund to or for the account of such persons, in such amounts, at such times, and on such terms, as the Secretary of State or his designee shall certify and the certificates of the Secretary of State or his designee issued hereunder shall be conclusive as to the propriety of payments so made. The expenditure of the said sum by the United States shall constitute full performance of the obligation of the United States to the Iranian Government or any other person arising out of the said notes and shall discharge the Secretary of State and the Secretary of the Treasury with respect to any accountability therefor.

(Sept. 29, 1950, ch. 1110, §§1, 2, 64 Stat. 1081.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Words "section 2668a of title 22" substituted in text for "the Act of February 27, 1896, (29 Stat. 32, title 31, U.S.C. sec. 547)" and "the said Act of February 27, 1896" to reflect the transfer of section 547 of Title 31, Money and Finance, to section 2668a of Title 22, Foreign Relations and Intercourse.

Words "sections 1321 and 1322(a) of title 31" substituted in text for "the Permanent Appropriation Repeal Act, 1934, as amended, section 20 (48 Stat. 1233, 31 U.S.C., sec. 725(s) [31 U.S.C. 725s]" on authority of Pub. L. 97–258, §4(b), Sept. 13, 1982, 96 Stat. 1067, the first section of which enacted Title 31.
T hi s di s pos i t i on i s notappr opr i a t e f orpubl i c a t i on and i s notpr e c e de nt * e xc e pta s pr ovi de d by 9th C i r . R . 36- 3.

Th e H o n o r ab l e Te n aCa mp b e l l , Se n i o rD i s tr i c tJ u d g e f o rth e U . S. ** D i s tr i c tC ourtf

orU t a h, s i tt i ng by de s i gna t i on.

NOT F OR P UB L I CAT I ON UN I TE D STATE S C OU RT OF APPE ALS FOR T HE NI NTH CI RC UI T J ERRY LY N N D A V I S, P e titio n e r- A p p e lla n t, v. NE VA DA AT T ORNE Y G E NE R AL ; E . K. M C D A N I E L , W a r de n, R esp o n d en t s - A p p el l ees. N o. 10- 15450 D . C. N o . 3 : 0 9 - c v - 0 0 2 2 2 - ECRR AM ME MOR AN DU M *

A pp ea l fr om the U ni t ed S t at es D i stri ctC ou rt

f orthe D i s tr i c tof

N e va da E dw a r d C . R e e d, S e ni orD i s tr i c tJ udge , P r e s i di ng A r gue d a nd S ubm i tt e d F e brua ry 14, 2011 S a n F r a n c is c o , C a lif

o rn ia B e f or e : O ’ S C A N N L A I N a nd T R O T T , C i r c ui tJ udge s , a nd C A M P B E L L , S e ni or D i stri ctJudg e. ** J e rry D a vi s appe a l s the di s tr i c tc ourt ’ s de ni a l of hi s pe t i t i on f

oraw r i tof habe a s c orpus . W e r e vi e w de novo the di s tr i c tc our t ’ s de ni a l of habe a s r e l i e f

, a nd 

# FI LED MA R 04 2011 M OLLY C. DW Y ER, CLERK U . S. C O U R T OF APPE ALS“ [ w ] e m a y a f f i rm the di s tr i c tc our t ’ s de c i s i on on a ny gr ound s uppor t e d by the r e c o r d , e v e n if

it d if f e r s f r o m th e d is tr ic t c o u r t’s r a tio n a le .” L a m b e r t v . B lo d g e tt, 393 F . 3d 943, 965 ( 9th C i r . 2004) . M r . D a vi s ’ s c l a i m , tha the r e c e i ve d i ne f f e c t i ve a s s i s t a nc e due t o hi s tr i a l c ouns e l ’ s f a i l ur e t o obj e c tt o the tr i a l c our t ’ s i m pos i t i on of c ons e c ut i ve s e nt e nc e s , w a s f a i r l y pr e s e nt e d t o the N e va daS upr e m e C our t ; the c la im is th u s p r o p e r ly e x h au s te d . C a s tillo v . M c F a d d e n , 3 9 9 F .3 d 9 9 3 , 9 9 8 - 9 9 ( 9 th C i r. 20 05 ). H avi ng expand ed the C ert i fi ca t e of A pp ea l abi l i ty and re ce i ved sup pl em ent al br i e f i ng r e ga r di ng the m e r i t s of M r . D a vi s ’ s c l a i m f

r om the pa r t i e s , the c our tf i nds i tt o b e w i tho utm er i t . T he l as tre as on ed o pi ni on of the st at e c ou rtdet erm i ned that the performance of M r. D avi s’ s c ou nsel w as no tdefi ci entbecause N evada l aw d o e s n o t b in d atr ia l c o u rt to ap le aa g r e e m e n t, a n d M r . D a v is a c k n o w le d g e d h is un ders t andi ng thatthe se nt ence i m po se d w ou l d b e a tthe sol e di sc re t i on of the tri al c o u rt. T h is d e c is io n w a s n o t c o n tr a ry to , n o rd id it in v o lv e a n u n r e a s o n ab le appl i c a t i on of

, c l e a r l y e s t abl i s he d f

e de r a l l a w : i n thi s c a s e , the s t a nda r d f or e f f e c t i ve a s s i s t a nc e of

c ouns e l s e tf

or th by S tr i c kl a nd v. W a s hi ngt on, 466 U . S . 668, 68 7-88 (198 4). A F F I R M E D .
###### Editorial Note on Part 479

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 479 appear by T.D. ATF-487, 68 FR 3752, Jan. 24, 2003.

#### § 479.83 Transfer tax in addition to import duty.

The transfer tax imposed by section 5811, I.R.C., is in addition to any import duty.
---



##### 



(a)
    
    The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
 (b)
    
    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
 /s/ Joseph M. Gingo

Joseph M. GingoPresident and Chief Executive Officer of A. Schulman, Inc.July 6, 2011




---



##### 



(a)
    
    The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
 (b)
    
    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
 /s/ Joseph J. Levanduski

Joseph J. LevanduskiVice President, Chief Financial Officer, and Treasurer of A. Schulman, Inc.July 6, 2011
§ 771.108 Director of Industry Operations' decision. When the Director of Industry Operations issues an initial decision in accordance with § 771.77 or § 771.107 the decision shall become a part of the record. The decision shall consist of: ( a ) A brief statement of the issues involved in the proceedings;
( b ) The Director of Industry Operations' findings and conclusions, as well as the reasons therefor; and
( c ) The Director of Industry Operations' determination on the record.
**Exhibit 32.3**

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO**

**18 U.S.C. §1350,**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

In connection with the amended Annual Report of Kodiak Oil & Gas Corp. (the “Company”) on Form 10-K/A for the period ended December 31, 2013 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Lynn A. Peterson, President and Chief Executive Officer, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

(1)                                 The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)                                 The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

 
| Date:   April 30, 2014             |   |
|-----------------------------------------|--------|
|                                    |   |
|                                    |   |
| /s/   Lynn A. Peterson                  |   |
| Lynn   A. Peterson                      |   |
| *President and Chief Executive Officer* |   |
| *(principal executive officer)*         |   |

 

----
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY ELEV

 964.25

 964.26

 964.43

 964.58

 964.74

 964.87

 965.17

 965.58

 965.87

 966.26

 966.51

 966.70

 966.90

 967.09

 967.29

 967.50

 967.67

 967.85

 968.03

 968.21

 968.30

 968.25

 968.41

 968.45

 968.49

 968.53

 968.76

 968.89

 969.03

 969.47

 970.36

 1,165.2

 1,165.3

 1,166.7

 1,167.9

 1,169.1

 1,170.2

 1,172.6

 1,175.8

 1,178.1

 1,181.3

 1,183.3

 1,184.8

 1,186.4

 1,187.9

 1,189.5

 1,191.2

 1,192.6

 1,194.0

 1,195.5

 1,196.9

 1,197.7

 1,197.3

 1,198.6

 1,198.9

 1,199.2

 1,199.5

 1,201.4

 1,202.4

 1,203.6

 1,207.1

 1,214.4

STORAGE

+1.3

+0.1

+1.4

+1.2

+1.3

+1.0

+2.4

+3.3

+2.3

+3.1

+2.0

+1.5

+1.6

+1.5

+1.6

+1.7

+1.4

+1.4

+1.5

+1.5

+0.7

-0.4

+1.3

+0.3

+0.3

+0.3

+1.9

+1.1

+1.1

+3.6

+7.2

CHANGE

663

657

701

625

668

553

1,651

2,256

1,186

1,601

1,038

795

832

789

834

874

720

758

755

758

682

670

674

711

629

619

960

1,063

1,101

2,000

3,668

INFLOW

 14

 612

 14

 14

 14

 14

 446

 601

 14

 14

 14

 14

 14

 14

 14

 14

 14

 14

 14

 14

 302

 871

 14

 540

 456

 446

 14

 499

 525

 191

 14

POWER

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

SPILL

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

OUTLET

 8

 5

 5

 10

 13

 18

 0

 5

 5

 13

 13

 13

 10

 5

 8

 8

 16

 13

 10

 10

 13

 3

 8

 8

 10

 10

 8

 34

 5

 8

 5

C.F.S.

 .03

 .02

 .02

 .04

 .05

 .07

 .00

 .02

 .02

 .05

 .05

 .05

 .04

 .02

 .03

 .03

 .06

 .05

 .04

 .04

 .05

 .01

 .03

 .03

 .04

 .04

 .03

 .13

 .02

 .03

 .02

INCHES

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .56

 1.09

 .17

 .00

 .00

 .02

 .01

 .01

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .01

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .11

 .97

 .53

 .63

 2.07

PRECIP

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

DECEMBER 2004 NEW MELONES LAKE DAILY OPERATIONS RUN DATE: January 13, 2005

IN LAKE

EVAPORATION

INCHES

C.F.S.

COMPUTED*

1000 ACRE-FEET

RELEASE - C.F.S.

TOTALS +50.5 31,491 5,769 0 0 300 1.16 6.18

ACRE-FEET +50,500 62,462 11,443 0 0 595

COMMENTS:

* COMPUTED INFLOW IS THE SUM OF CHANGE IN STORAGE, RELEASES AND EVAPORATION.

SUMMARY

RELEASE (ACRE-FEET)

POWER 11,443

SPILL 0

OUTLET

TOTAL

 0

 11,443

PRECIPITATION

THIS MONTH =

TO DATE =

 6.18

JULY 1, 2004 13.05

 1,164.0

Table 13
(No. 73-CC-426

#### Catholic Charities of the Archdiocese of Chicago, Claimant, *vs.*State of Illinois, Department of Children and Family Services, Respondent.

*Opinion filed September 5, 1973.*

Catholic Charities of the Archdiocese of Chicago, Claimant, pro se.

William J. Scott, Attorney General; Saul R. Wexler, Assistant Attorney General, for Respondent.

Per Curiam.
Editorial Note on Part 70
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 70 appear by T.D. ATF-450, 66 FR 29022-29030, May 29, 2001.

§ 70.321 Registration of persons paying a special tax. ( a ) *Persons required to register.* Every person engaged in a trade or business in respect of which a special tax is imposed by one of the following sections of the Internal Revenue Code is required to register with the Alcohol and Tobacco Tax and Trade Bureau. ( 1 ) - ( 5 ) [Reserved]
( 6 ) Section 5731 (relating to special tax on manufacturers of tobacco products, manufacturers of cigarette papers and tubes, and export warehouse proprietors); or
( 7 ) Section 5802 (relating to importers, manufacturers and dealers of National Firearms Act weapons).
( b ) *Procedure for registration.* The registration required of a person by reason of the person being engaged in a trade or business, in respect of which one of the special taxes listed in paragraph (a) of this section is imposed, shall be accomplished by timely executing and filing, in accordance with the instructions relating thereto, TTB Form 5630.5, Special Tax Registration and Return.
(26 U.S.C. 5802, 7011)
[T.D. ATF-6, 38 FR 32445, Nov. 26, 1973, as amended by T.D. ATF-271, 53 FR 17549, May 17, 1988. Redesignated and amended by T.D. ATF-301, 55 FR 47606, 47653, Nov. 14, 1990; T.D. ATF-379, 61 FR 31426, June 20, 1996; T.D. TTB-79, 74 FR 37424, July 28, 2009]
### §9582. Copyright

Nothing in this Act shall be construed to affect the rights, remedies, limitations, or defense under title 17.

(Pub. L. 107–279, title I, §192, Nov. 5, 2002, 116 Stat. 1974.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

This Act, referred to in text, means Pub. L. 107–279, Nov. 5, 2002, 116 Stat. 1940, which enacted this chapter and section 3419 of this title, amended sections 1232j, 3412, 3461, 6194, 6311, 6312, 7013, 7451, 7703, 7909, 9007, 9010, 9011, 9573, 9623, and 9624 and former sections 6317, 6491, 6932, 7253c, 7283b, and 7283d of this title and section 5315 of Title 5, Government Organization and Employees, transferred sections 9010 and 9011 of this title to sections 9621 and 9622 of this title, respectively, repealed sections 3419, 6011, 6021, 6031, 6041, 6051, 6053 to 6053e, 6054 to 6054b, 6055 to 6055h, 6056, 6056a, 9001 to 9009, and 9012 of this title, enacted provisions set out as notes under section 7703 and 9501 of this title, and repealed provisions set out as notes under sections 1221e and 9001 of this title. For complete classification of this Act to the Code, see Tables.
Exhibit 32.1





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906


OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Presidential Realty Corporation (the “Company”) for the period ending March 31, 2011, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Jeffrey F. Joseph, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:





(1)
the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934: and





(2)
the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and the results of operations of the Company.





Presidential Realty CorporationBy:
/s/ JEFFREY F. JOSEPHJeffrey F. JosephChief Executive Officer





Date: May 23, 2011
#### The People of the State of New York ex rel. Jacob Pine, Appellant, v. James M. Morrow and Others, Constituting the Examining Board of Plumbers of the City of New York, Respondents.

Order affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements. Ho opinion. Present — Ingraham, P. J., McLaughlin, Laughlin, Clarke and Scott, JJ.
Editorial Note on Part 28
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 28 appear by T.D. ATF-477, 67 FR 18087 through 18090, Apr. 15, 2002.

§ 28.220 Notice of return. If an exporter desires to return wine to a bonded wine cellar or wholesale liquor dealer as provided in § 28.219, he shall file a notice, executed under the penalties of perjury, with the appropriate TTB officer. The notice shall be prepared in triplicate for submission to the customs official as required in § 28.220a. The notice shall show the: ( a ) Name, address, and registration number of the bonded wine cellar from which withdrawn;
( b ) Date and serial number of the Form 1582-A (5120.24) on which the wine was withdrawn;
( c ) Present location of the wine to be returned;
( d ) Number, size and identification of the containers;
( e ) Total wine gallons for each tax class of wine; and
( f ) Reason for the return.
(Approved by the Office of Management and Budget under control number 1512-0292) (Sec. 201, Pub. L. 85-859, 72 Stat. 1336, as amended (26 U.S.C. 5062))
[T.D. ATF-198, 50 FR 8562, Mar. 1, 1985; 50 FR 23410, June 4, 1985, as amended by T.D. TTB-8, 69 FR 3833, Jan. 27, 2004]
#### § 1002.88 Is the employee required to tell his or her civilian employer that he or she intends to seek reemployment after completing uniformed service before the employee leaves to perform service in the uniformed services?

No. When the employee leaves the employment position to begin a period of service, he or she is not required to tell the civilian employer that he or she intends to seek reemployment after completing uniformed service. Even if the employee tells the employer before entering or completing uniformed service that he or she does not intend to seek reemployment after completing the uniformed service, the employee does not forfeit the right to reemployment after completing service. The employee is not required to decide in advance of leaving the civilian employment position whether he or she will seek reemployment after completing uniformed service.
Electronically Filed

Intermediate Court of Appeals

CAAP-13-0005354

28-FEB-2014

08:28 AM
#### Utuh Rahardja PUTRA, Petitioner, v. Alberto R. GONZALES, United States Attorney General, Respondent.

No. 05-1890.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: June 28, 2006.

Decided: July 24, 2006.

Aex Chanthunya, Silver Spring, Maryland, for Petitioner. Peter D. Keisler, Assistant Attorney General, M. Jocelyn Lopez Wright, Assistant Director, Kristin K. Edison, United States Department of Justice, Washington, D.C., for Respondent.

Before WILLIAMS, MOTZ, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.

Petition denied by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).

PER CURIAM:

Utuh Rahardja Putra, a native and citizen of Indonesia, petitions for review of a decision of the Board of Immigration Appeals (Board), affirming, without opinion, the immigration judge’s ruling finding Putra removable and denying his motion for a third continuance of his removal proceeding pending adjudication of his labor certification application. On appeal, Putra challenges the denial of a third continuance.

“The immigration judge may grant a motion for continuance for good cause shown.” 8 C.F.R. § 1003.29 (2006). Whether to grant such a motion “is within the sound discretion of the immigration judge and is reviewed for abuse of discretion only.” *Onyeme v. INS,*146 F.3d 227, 231 (4th Cir.1998). Based on the materials before us, we find no abuse of discretion in the denial of Putra’s motion for a third continuance.

Accordingly, we deny the petition for review. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*PETITION DENIED.*
#### JET AIRWAYS, INC., Appellant, v. JET ENTERPRISES PVT., LTD., Appellee.

No. 05-1473.

United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit.

Feb. 10, 2006.

Before RADER, SCHALL, and PROST, Circuit Judges.

ON MOTION

PER CURIAM.

*ORDER*

Nancy M. Heckerman moves for an extension of time for Jet Airways, Inc. to obtain counsel. Jet Enterprises Pvt., Ltd. opposes.

Jet Airways’ appeal was docketed on July 19, 2005. On August 26, 2005, we granted Jet Airways a 45-day extension of time for counsel to enter an appearance. On October 17, 2005, we granted a 30-day extension of time for counsel to enter an appearance. On November 22, 2005, we granted a 60-day extension for counsel to enter an appearance. In the last order granting Jet Airways an extension, the court indicated that “[n]o further extensions” would be granted.

When the court states “no further extensions,” it means it. These words are not lightly or routinely added to orders. Because counsel for Jet Airways did not enter an appearance within the explicit deadline set by the court in its November 22, 2005 order, the motion is denied.

*943Accordingly,

IT IS ORDERED THAT:

(1) The motion is denied.

(2) Jet Airways’ appeal is dismissed.

(8) Each side shall bear its own costs.
#### § 5.54 Visibility of mandatory information.

Mandatory information on a label must be readily visible and may not be covered or obscured in whole or in part. See § 5.62 for rules regarding packaging of containers (including cartons, coverings, and cases). See subpart N of this part for regulations pertaining to advertising materials.
###### Editorial Note on Part 44

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 44 appear by T.D. ATF-464, 66 FR 43480, Aug. 20, 2001, and T.D. ATF-480, 67 FR 30801-30803, May 8, 2002.

#### § 44.245 Strengthening bond.

Where the appropriate TTB officer determines that the amount of the bond, under which the customs warehouse proprietor is withdrawing cigars for shipment under this subpart, no longer adequately protects the revenue, and such bond is in an amount of less than $25,000, the appropriate TTB officer may require the proprietor to file a strengthening bond in an appropriate amount with the same surety as that on the bond already in effect, in lieu of a superseding bond to cover the full liability on the basis of § 44.244. The appropriate TTB officer shall refuse to approve any strengthening bond where any notation is made thereon which is intended or which may be construed as a release of any former bond, or as limiting the amount of either bond to less than its full amount.
§ 222.14 What requirements must a local educational agency meet for an eligible overpayment to be forgiven in whole or part? The Secretary forgives an eligible overpayment, in whole or part as described in § 222.18, if— ( a ) An LEA submits to the Department's Impact Aid Program office a written request for forgiveness by the later of— ( 1 ) Thirty days from the LEA's initial receipt of a written notice of the overpayment; or
( 2 ) September 2, 1997;
( b ) The LEA submits to the Department's Impact Aid Program office the information and documentation described in § 222.16 by the deadlines described in paragraph (a) of this section, or other time limit established in writing by the Secretary due to lack of availability of the information and documentation; and
( c ) The Secretary determines under § 222.17 that— ( 1 ) In the case either of an LEA's or the Department's error, repayment of the LEA's total eligible overpayments will result in an undue financial hardship on the LEA and seriously harm the LEA's educational program; or
( 2 ) In the case of the Department's error, determined on a case-by-case basis, repayment would be manifestly unjust (“manifestly unjust repayment exception”).
[62 FR 35413, July 1, 1997]