alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 1002.115 Is the employee required to report to or submit a timely application for reemployment to his or her pre-service employer upon completing the period of service in the uniformed services? Yes. Upon completing service in the uniformed services, the employee must notify the pre-service employer of his or her intent to return to the employment position by either reporting to work or submitting a timely application for reemployment. Whether the employee is required to report to work or submit a timely application for reemployment depends upon the length of service, as follows: ( a ) *Period of service less than 31 days or for a period of any length for the purpose of a fitness examination.* If the period of service in the uniformed services was less than 31 days, or the employee was absent from a position of employment for a period of any length for the purpose of an examination to determine his or her fitness to perform service, the employee must report back to the employer not later than the beginning of the first full regularly-scheduled work period on the first full calendar day following the completion of the period of service, and the expiration of eight hours after a period allowing for safe transportation from the place of that service to the employee's residence. For example, if the employee completes a period of service and travel home, arriving at ten o'clock in the evening, he or she cannot be required to report to the employer until the beginning of the next full regularly-scheduled work period that begins at least eight hours after arriving home, *i.e.*, no earlier than six o'clock the next morning. If it is impossible or unreasonable for the employee to report within such time period through no fault of his or her own, he or she must report to the employer as soon as possible after the expiration of the eight-hour period.
( b ) *Period of service more than 30 days but less than 181 days.* If the employee's period of service in the uniformed services was for more than 30 days but less than 181 days, he or she must submit an application for reemployment (written or verbal) with the employer not later than 14 days after completing service. If it is impossible or unreasonable for the employee to apply within 14 days through no fault of his or her own, he or she must submit the application not later than the next full calendar day after it becomes possible to do so.
( c ) *Period of service more than 180 days.* If the employee's period of service in the uniformed services was for more than 180 days, he or she must submit an application for reemployment (written or verbal) not later than 90 days after completing service.
§ 211.7 Compensation credited for creditable military service. In determining the creditable compensation of an employee, the following amounts shall be credited for each month of military service, provided the employee's combined monthly railroad and military compensation does not exceed the maximum creditable amount: ( a ) $160 for each calendar month before 1968;
( b ) $260 for each calendar month after 1967 and before 1975;
( c ) For years after 1974, the actual military earnings reported as wages under the Social Security Act.
[53 FR 17184, May 16, 1988]
Exhibit
        32.2
 
 Multiband
        Corporation
 
 Certification
        Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350
 As
        Adopted Pursuant to
 Section
        906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
  In
        connection with this Quarterly Report Form 10-Q, Multiband Corporation (the
        “Company”) for the period ended June 30, 2006, I, Steven M. Bell, Secretary and
        Treasurer of the Company, hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
        as
        adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
        that:
 
 1.  This
        Periodic Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
        15(d)
        of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d));
        and
 2.  The
        information contained in the Periodic Report fairly presents, in all material
        respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
        Company.
  Date: August
                14, 2006
              By:
              /s/
                Steven M. Bell*Chief
                Financial Officer*
###### Editorial Note on Part 71

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 71 appear by T.D. ATF-414, 64 FR 49084, Sept. 10, 1999and T.D. ATF-463, 66 FR 42734, 42735, Aug. 15, 2001.

#### § 71.81 Suspension, revocation, or annulment.

In hearings on the suspension, revocation, or annulment of a permit, the burden of proof is on the Government.

[T.D. ATF-199, 50 FR 9197, Mar. 6, 1985]
§ 10.719 If a settlement or judgment is received for more than one wound or medical condition, can the refundable disbursements paid on a single FECA claim be attributed to different conditions for purposes of calculating the refund or credit owed to the United States? ( a ) All wounds, diseases or other medical conditions accepted by OWCP in connection with a single claim are treated as the same injury for the purpose of computing any required refund and any credit against future benefits in connection with the receipt of a recovery from a third party, except that an injury caused by medical malpractice in treating an injury covered under the FECA will be treated as a separate injury for purposes of section 8132.
( b ) If an injury covered under the FECA is caused under circumstances creating a legal liability in more than one person, other than the United States, to pay damages, OWCP or SOL will determine whether recoveries received from one or more third parties should be attributed to separate conditions for which compensation is payable in connection with a single FECA claim. If such an attribution is both practicable and equitable, as determined by OWCP or SOL, in its discretion, the conditions will be treated as separate injuries for purposes of calculating the refund and credit owed to the United States under section 8132.
477 P.2d 1015

#### STATE of New Mexico, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Glen Thomas KING, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 527.

Court of Appeals of New Mexico.

Dec. 4, 1970.

C. Gene Samberson, Heidel, Swarthout & Samberson, Lovington, for defendant-appellant.

James A. Maloney, Atty. Gen., Santa Fe, Frank N. Chavez, Asst. Atty. Gen., for plaintiff-appellee.

OPINION

HENDLEY, Judge.

Defendant’s motion for post-conviction relief under Rule 93 [§ 21-1-1 (93) N.M. S.A. 1953 (Supp.1969)] was denied without a hearing and he appeals.

We affirm.

Defendant asserts that he was not advised of his right to remain silent; that he was at no time afforded counsel; that he signed a statement without assistance of counsel; and that the district attorney’s office advised him as to what to do when he entered his plea.

These assertions are not sustained by the record. The record shows that he was offered counsel if he could not afford to hire his own lawyer, that he told the court he did not want a lawyer, and then after questioning by the court concerning his understanding of the possible penalty, his right to a jury trial, defendant denied any promise or threats, and denied making any statements that made him think he ought to plead guilty, he then proceeded to plead guilty.

Defendant does not claim that his guilty plea was involuntary. Absent such a claim, and with the affirmative showing of the questioning by the court prior to the plea, the claims state no basis for relief. State v. Elledge, 81 N.M. 18, 462 P.2d 152 (Ct.App.1969).

Defendant claims that failure to appoint counsel to assist in the “motion under rule 93” was error. We disagree. Defendant was not entitled to appointed counsel on motion for post-conviction relief where the files and records conclusively showed that he was not entitled to relief. *201State of New Mexico v. Tafoya, 81 N.M. 686, 472 P.2d 651 (Ct.App.1970).

Affirmed.

It is so ordered.

SPIESS, C. J., and WOOD, J., concur.
§ 9.22 Augusta. ( a ) *Name.* The name of the viticultural area described in this section is “Augusta.”
( b ) *Approved maps.* The approved maps for the Augusta viticultural area are two U.S.G.S. maps. They are titled: ( 1 ) “Washington East, Missouri”, 7.5 minute quadrangle; and
( 2 ) “Labadie, Missouri”, 7.5 minute quadrangle.
( c ) *Boundaries.* The boundaries of the Augusta viticultural area are located in the State of Missouri and are as follows: ( 1 ) The beginning point of the boundary is the intersection of the St. Charles County line, the Warren County line and the Franklin County line.
( 2 ) The western boundary is the St. Charles County-Warren County line from the beginning point to the township line identified on the approved maps as “T45N/T44N.”
( 3 ) The northern boundary is the township line “T45N/T44N” from the St. Charles County-Warren County line to the range line identified on the approved maps as “R1E/R2E.”
( 4 ) The eastern boundary is the range line “R1E/R2E” from township line “T45N/T44N” extended to the St. Charles County-Franklin County line.
( 5 ) The southern boundary is the St. Charles County-Franklin County line from the extension of range line “R1E/R2E” to the beginning point.
[T.D. ATF-72, 45 FR 41633, June 20, 1980]
Brown Retail Registration Statement Company Commission Act Exchange Offer Exchange
Notes Original Notes Indenture Trustee Guarantors




---



##### 








---



##### 



Very truly yours,/s/ Cozen OConnorCOZEN OCONNOR
[if !vml]>[endif]>

[if !vml]>[endif]>

You have reached the FederalDepository Library Program Electronic Collection (FDLP/EC) Archive. Thisarchive assures ongoing access to publications in the FDLP/EC. Access topublications in the archive is available through GPO's suite of cataloging andlocator services, including the Catalog of U.S. Government Publications(CGP).  Archived copies of publications are retrieved in the event thatpublications are no longer available from the original publishing agency site. 
**Title:****Les enfants au bord de gouffre**
 
2002 | 2004
 
SuDoc Number:ID 1.8:OR 7/FRENCH/
Item Number:0900-I-01 (online)
CGP systemNumber:000863103
 
April 6, 2018
#### In the Matter of the Claim of J. Nelson Abrams, Appellant, against County of Albany et al., Respondents. State Industrial Board, Respondent.

*808Hill, P. J., Crapser, Heller-nan and Schenck, JJ., concur; Bliss, J., taking no part. [See post, p. 885.]
#### § 1002.213 How can the employee demonstrate a reasonable certainty that he or she would have received the seniority right or benefit if he or she had remained continuously employed during the period of service?

A reasonable certainty is a high probability that the employee would have received the seniority or seniority-based right or benefit if he or she had been continuously employed. The employee does not have to establish that he or she would have received the benefit as an absolute certainty. The employee can demonstrate a reasonable certainty that he or she would have received the seniority right or benefit by showing that other employees with seniority similar to that which the employee would have had if he or she had remained continuously employed received the right or benefit. The employer cannot withhold the right or benefit based on an assumption that a series of unlikely events could have prevented the employee from gaining the right or benefit.
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

April 24, 2019

No. 04-18-00553-CR

Nicole Patrice SELECTMAN,

Appellant

v.

The STATE of Texas,

Appellee

From the 144th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2015CR9689

Honorable Lorina I. Rummel, Judge Presiding

ORDER

The Appellant’s Motion to Amend Brief is GRANTED.

_________________________________

Liza A. Rodriguez, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said 

court on this 24th day of April, 2019.

___________________________________

KEITH E. HOTTLE,

Clerk of Court
Document headings vary by document type but may contain
                    the following: the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document
the number of the CFR title and the number of each part
                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly
                      related to
the agency docket number / agency internal file number
the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in
                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory
                      Actions See the
                    Document Drafting Handbook
                    for more details.
 Small Business Administration [Disaster Declaration #12519 and #12520]
 AGENCY: U.S. Small Business Administration.
 ACTION: Notice.
 SUMMARY: This is a notice of an Administrative declaration of a disaster for the State of Florida dated 04/07/2011. *Incident:*
                         Severe Storms, Flooding and Tornadoes. *Incident Period:*
                         03/31/2011. *Effective Date:*
                         04/07/2011. *Physical Loan Application Deadline Date:*
                         06/06/2011. *Economic Injury (EIDL) Loan Application Deadline Date:*
                         01/09/2012.
 ADDRESSES: Submit completed loan applications to: U.S. Small Business Administration, Processing and Disbursement Center, 14925 Kingsport Road, Fort Worth, TX 76155.
 FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: A. Escobar, Office of Disaster Assistance, U.S. Small Business Administration, 409 3rd Street, SW., Suite 6050, Washington, DC 20416.


SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Notice is hereby given that as a result of the Administrator's disaster declaration, applications for disaster loans may be filed at the address listed above or other locally announced locations. The following areas have been determined to be adversely affected by the disaster: *Primary Counties:*
                     Hillsborough. *Contiguous Counties:*
                     Florida: Hardee, Manatee, Pasco, Pinellas, Polk. The Interest Rates are: PercentFor Physical Damage:Homeowners with Credit Available Elsewhere
5.125Homeowners without Credit Available Elsewhere
2.563Businesses with Credit Available Elsewhere
6.000Businesses without Credit Available Elsewhere
4.000Non-Profit Organizations with Credit Available Elsewhere
3.250Non-Profit Organizations without Credit Available Elsewhere
3.000For Economic Injury:Businesses & Small Agricultural Cooperatives without Credit Available Elsewhere
4.000Non-Profit Organizations without Credit Available Elsewhere
3.000
 The number assigned to this disaster for physical damage is 12519 C and for economic injury is 12520 0. The State which received an EIDL Declaration # is Florida. (Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Numbers 59002 and 59008) Dated: April 7, 2011. Karen G. Mills, Administrator.


[FR Doc. 2011-9104 Filed 4-13-11; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 8025-01-P
NO. 07-05-0270-CR

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE SEVENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

AT AMARILLO

PANEL D

AUGUST 12, 2005

______________________________

ROY BRENT CAMPBELL, APPELLANT

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, APPELLEE

_________________________________

FROM THE 181ST DISTRICT COURT OF RANDALL COUNTY;

NO. 16,584-B; HONORABLE JOHN BOARD, JUDGE

_______________________________

Before QUINN, C.J., and REAVIS and CAMPBELL, JJ.

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Appellant, Roy Brent Campbell, appeals from his conviction for Debit Card Abuse.

Sentence was imposed on April 6, 2005. The clerk’s record was filed on August 11, 2005.

We will dismiss the appeal for want of jurisdiction.

Our appellate jurisdiction over a criminal appeal is triggered through a timely notice

of appeal. Olivo v. State, 918 S.W.2d 519, 522 (Tex.Crim.App. 1996). In the absence of

a notice of appeal timely filed in compliance with the requirements of Rule of Appellate
2

Procedure 26, a court of appeals does not obtain jurisdiction to address the merits of the

appeal in a criminal case, and can take no action other than to dismiss the appeal. Slaton

v. State, 981 S.W.2d 208, 210 (Tex.Crim.App. 1998). As applicable here, Rule of Appellate

Procedure 26.2(a) requires a notice of appeal in a criminal case be filed within 30 days after

the day sentence is imposed or suspended in open court, or within 90 days after imposition

of the sentence if a timely motion for new trial is filed. Rule 26.3 allows for an extension

of time if the appellant files a notice of appeal with the trial court within 15 days after the

deadline for filing the notice of appeal and files a motion for extension with the appellate

court. 

Here, the record reflects that the court imposed sentence on appellant on April 6,

2005. A motion for new trial was timely filed on April 29, 2005, making appellant’s notice

of appeal due July 5. The notice of appeal was filed August 4, more than 15 days after its

due date. A motion for extension of time was filed with this court on July 26, 2005, also

more than 15 days after the due date for the notice of appeal. Tex. R. App. P. 26.3.

Appellant’s failure to file a timely notice of appeal or to meet the requirements for an

extension under Rule 26.3 prevents this court from having jurisdiction over his appeal.

Slaton, 981 S.W.2d at 210. 

Consequently, the appeal is dismissed for want of jurisdiction. 

James T. Campbell

 Justice

Do not publish.
### §844b. Repealed. Pub. L. 93–380, title IV, §402(c)(2)(ii), Aug. 21, 1974, 88 Stat. 546

Section, Pub. L. 89–10, title III, §306, as added Pub. L. 90–247, title I, §131, Jan. 2, 1968, 81 Stat. 796; amended Pub. L. 91–230, title I, §131(a)(1), Apr. 13, 1970, 84 Stat. 139, provided for special programs and projects.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date of Repeal

Repeal effective July 1, 1975, see section 402(c)(2) of Pub. L. 93–380.
###### Editorial Note on Part 46

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 46 appear by T.D. ATF-457, 66 FR 32220, 32221, June 14, 2001.

#### § 46.79 Supervision.

Before payment is made under this subpart in respect of the tax, or tax and duty, on tobacco products, or cigarette papers or tubes rendered unmarketable or condemned by a duly authorized official, such tobacco products, or cigarette papers or tubes must be destroyed by suitable means under the supervision of an appropriate TTB officer who will be assigned for that purpose by another appropriate TTB officer. However, if the destruction of such tobacco products, or cigarette papers or tubes has already occurred, and if the appropriate TTB officer who acts on the claim is satisfied with the supervision of such destruction, TTB supervision will not be required.

[T.D. ATF-472, 67 FR 8881, Feb. 27, 2002]
#### § 1002.101 Does the five-year service limit include periods of service that the employee performed when he or she worked for a previous employer?

No. An employee is entitled to a leave of absence for uniformed service for up to five years with each employer for whom he or she works. When the employee takes a position with a new employer, the five-year period begins again regardless of how much service he or she performed while working in any previous employment relationship. If an employee is employed by more than one employer, a separate five-year period runs as to each employer independently, even if those employers share or co-determine the employee's terms and conditions of employment.
§ 902.5 Hearing procedures. ( a ) The hearing shall be open to the public pursuant to Article VI (d)(1) of the Compact.
( b ) The Council Chairman or his/her designee shall preside over the hearing and may limit the number of, and the length of time allowed to, presenters or witnesses.
( c ) The person or organization raising the dispute or a Compact Party charged under the provisions of § 902.2(a)(4) shall be entitled to: ( 1 ) File additional written materials with the Council at least ten days prior to the hearing;
( 2 ) Appear at the hearing, in person and/or by counsel;
( 3 ) Make an oral presentation; and
( 4 ) Call and cross-examine witnesses.
( d ) Subject to the discretion of the Chairman, other persons and organizations may be permitted to appear and make oral presentations at the hearing or provide written materials to the Council concerning the dispute.
( e ) All Council members, including a member or members who raised the dispute that is the subject of the hearing shall be entitled to participate fully in the hearing and vote on the final Council decision concerning the dispute.
( f ) The Council shall, if necessary, continue the hearing to a subsequent Council meeting.
( g ) Summary minutes of the hearing shall be made and transcribed and shall be available for inspection by any person at the Council office within the Federal Bureau of Investigation.
( h ) The proceedings of the hearing shall be recorded and, as necessary, transcribed. A transcript of the hearing will be made and forwarded to the Attorney General if an appeal is filed pursuant to Section (c) of Article XI of the Compact.
( i ) The Council's decision on the dispute shall be based upon a majority vote of Council members or their proxies present (as per Compact Article VI and Council Bylaws) and voting at the hearing. The Council's decision on the dispute shall be published in the Federal Register as provided by Section (a)(2) of Article XI and Section (e) of Article VI.
( j ) The Council Chairman shall advise Council members and hearing participants of the right of appeal provided by Section (c) of Article XI of the Compact.
### §4423. Headquarters

Santa Fe, New Mexico, shall be maintained as the location for the Institute of Indian and Alaska Native Culture and Arts Development. To facilitate this action and the continuity of programs being provided at the Institute of American Indian Arts, the Board may enter into negotiations with State and local governments for such exchanges or transfers of lands and such other assistance as may be required.

(Pub. L. 99–498, title XV, §1516, Oct. 17, 1986, 100 Stat. 1609; Pub. L. 102–325, title XIII, §1331(h), July 23, 1992, 106 Stat. 807.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

1992—Pub. L. 102–325 struck out "The site of the Institute of American Indian Arts, at" before "Santa Fe, New Mexico" and substituted "the Board may enter" for "the Secretary may enter".

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date of 1992 Amendment

Amendment by Pub. L. 102–325 effective Oct. 1, 1992, see section 2 of Pub. L. 102–325, set out as a note under section 1001 of this title.