alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 12(a)

FORM 10-Q

PACCAR FINANCIAL CORP.

COMPUTATION OF RATIO OF EARNINGS TO FIXED
CHARGES

PURSUANT TO SEC REPORTING REQUIREMENTS(1)

(Millions of Dollars)



|                                   |  |                               |       |  |      |   |       | 
|---------------------------------- |  | ----------------------------- | ----- |  | ---- | - | ----- | 
|                                   |  | Nine months endedSeptember 30 |      
|                                   |  | 2010                          |       |  | 2009 |  
|FIXED CHARGES                      |  |                               |       |  |      |   |       | 
|Interest expense                   |  | $                             | 70.6  |  |      | $ | 99.0  | 
|Portion of rentals deemed interest |  |                               | 1.2   |  |      |   | 1.3   | 
|                                   |  |                               |       |  |      |   |       | 
|                                   |  |                               |       |  |      |   |       | 
|TOTAL FIXED CHARGES                |  | $                             | 71.8  |  |      | $ | 100.3 | 
|                                   |  |                               |       |  |      |   |       | 
|                                   |  |                               |       |  |      |   |       | 
|EARNINGS                           |  |                               |       |  |      |   |       | 
|Income before income taxes         |  | $                             | 39.3  |  |      | $ | 30.1  | 
|Fixed charges                      |  |                               | 71.8  |  |      |   | 100.3 | 
|                                   |  |                               |       |  |      |   |       | 
|                                   |  |                               |       |  |      |   |       | 
|EARNINGS AS DEFINED                |  | $                             | 111.1 |  |      | $ | 130.4 | 
|                                   |  |                               |       |  |      |   |       | 
|                                   |  |                               |       |  |      |   |       | 
|RATIO OF EARNINGS TO FIXED CHARGES |  |                               | 1.55X |  |      |   | 1.30X | 
|                                   |  |                               |       |  |      |   |       | 



|(1) | The method of computing the ratio of earnings to fixed charges shown above complies with SEC reporting requirements but differs from the method called for in the
Support Agreement between the Company and PACCAR as shown in Exhibit 12(b).
|--- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY ELEV

 996.02

 996.13

 996.21

 996.10

 995.98

 996.07

 996.18

 996.00

 995.89

 995.84

 995.81

 995.77

 995.74

 995.73

 995.70

 995.63

 995.74

 995.75

 995.67

 995.67

 995.73

 995.62

 995.52

 995.57

 995.55

 995.50

 995.55

 995.56

 995.34

 995.16

 995.23

 1,434.9

 1,435.9

 1,436.6

 1,435.6

 1,434.5

 1,435.4

 1,436.3

 1,434.7

 1,433.7

 1,433.3

 1,433.0

 1,432.6

 1,432.4

 1,432.3

 1,432.0

 1,431.4

 1,432.4

 1,432.5

 1,431.7

 1,431.7

 1,432.3

 1,431.3

 1,430.4

 1,430.8

 1,430.7

 1,430.2

 1,430.7

 1,430.7

 1,428.8

 1,427.1

 1,427.8

STORAGE

-2.1

+1.0

+0.7

-1.0

-1.1

+0.8

+1.0

-1.6

-1.0

-0.5

-0.3

-0.4

-0.3

-0.1

-0.3

-0.6

+1.0

+0.1

-0.7

+0.0

+0.5

-1.0

-0.9

+0.5

-0.2

-0.5

+0.5

+0.1

-2.0

-1.6

+0.6

CHANGE

506

569

457

358

444

427

532

527

539

576

537

582

394

507

700

605

551

474

558

511

560

500

415

518

533

431

596

391

305

409

356

INFLOW

 1,498

 22

 22

 796

 928

 14

 14

 1,267

 952

 759

 633

 726

 512

 521

 801

 892

 21

 403

 881

 470

 249

 968

 826

 262

 528

 608

 328

 305

 1,283

 1,193

 28

POWER

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

SPILL

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

OUTLET

 59

 44

 70

 64

 64

 3

 15

 82

 88

 44

 41

 38

 18

 32

 35

 32

 29

 26

 41

 41

 38

 32

 44

 29

 96

 50

 41

 41

 23

 35

 9

C.F.S.

 .20

 .15

 .24

 .22

 .22

 .01

 .05

 .28

 .30

 .15

 .14

 .13

 .06

 .11

 .12

 .11

 .10

 .09

 .14

 .14

 .13

 .11

 .15

 .10

 .33

 .17

 .14

 .14

 .08

 .12

 .03

INCHES

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .03

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .25

 .28

 .01

 .20

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .15

 .00

 .00

 .24

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .03

 .02

 .35

 .02

PRECIP

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

OCTOBER 2007 NEW MELONES LAKE DAILY OPERATIONS RUN DATE: February 7, 2008

IN LAKE

EVAPORATION

INCHES

C.F.S.

COMPUTED*

1000 ACRE-FEET

RELEASE - C.F.S.

TOTALS -9.4 15,368 18,710 0 0 1,304 4.46 1.58

ACRE-FEET -9,400 30,482 37,111 0 0 2,586

COMMENTS:

SUMMARY

RELEASE (ACRE-FEET)

POWER 37,111

SPILL 0

OUTLET

TOTAL

 0

 37,111

PRECIPITATION

THIS MONTH =

TO DATE =

 1.58

JULY 1, 2007 1.88

 1,437.0

Table 13
Alabama Sturgeon Range

Gulf Sturgeon Range

(Listed 1991)

Inflated Heelsplitter Range

(Listed 1990)

Heavy Pigtoe Range (Listed 1987)

Southern Clubshell Range (Listed 1987)

Federally Listed Species Found in the 

Vicinity of Current Alabama Sturgeon Habitat

2000

Mobile River Basin

TN

MS

AL

GA

Lock E

Lock D

Lock C

Lock B

Lock A

Aberdeen L & D

Stennis L & D Bankhead Dam

Holt L & D

Oliver L & D

Bevill L & D

Heflin L & D

Selden L & D

Demopolis L & D

Claiborne L & D

Coffeeville L & D

Millers Ferry L & D

R. L. Henry L & D 

Jordan Dam

Mitchell Dam

Lay Dam

Logan Martin Dam

L. N. Henry Dam

Weiss Dam

Harris Dam

Martin Dam

Yates Dam

Thurlow Dam

Tomb

gi bee

River

Tombigbee

River

Cahaba

River

Black Warrior River

Coosa

River

Tallapoosa

River

Mobile

Dams

Alabama

River

Smith Dam

Coffeeville L & D
### §2802. Definitions

For purposes of this chapter—

(1) The term "Committees" means the Committee on Ways and Means of the House of Representatives and the Committee on Finance of the Senate.

(2) The term "grape product" means grapes and any product (other than wine) made from grapes, including, but not limited to, raisins and grape juice, whether or not concentrated.

(3) The term "major wine trading country" means any foreign country, or group of foreign countries, designated as such under section 2803 of this title.

(4) The phrase "nontariff barrier to (or other distortion of)", in the context of trade in United States wine, includes any measure implemented by the government of a major wine trading country that either gives a competitive advantage to the wine industry of that country or restricts the importation of United States wine into that country.

(5) The term "Trade Representative" means the United States Trade Representative.

(6) The term "United States wine" means wine produced within the customs territory of the United States.

(7) The term "wine" means any fermented alcoholic beverage that—

(A) is made from grapes or other fruit;

(B) contains not less than 0.5 percent alcohol by volume and not more than 24 percent alcohol by volume, including all dilutions and mixtures thereof by whatever process produced; and

(C) is for nonindustrial use.

(Pub. L. 98–573, title IX, §903, Oct. 30, 1984, 98 Stat. 3048.)
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY HIGH

 379

 348

 362

 290

 265

 280

 316

 333

 355

 410

 396

 378

 426

 440

 432

 450

 444

 368

 392

 455

 420

 443

 555

 526

 516

 543

 519

 600

 592

 597

 505

 218

 198

 197

 199

 206

 198

 182

 184

 194

 193

 185

 201

 192

 190

 190

 194

 196

 194

 199

 204

 200

 191

 204

 205

 205

 203

 208

 214

 217

 220

 227

 285

 269

 264

 239

 235

 241

 238

 232

 238

 250

 250

 253

 256

 253

 251

 248

 244

 241

 252

 266

 251

 241

 267

 260

 269

 251

 288

 287

 309

 298

 307

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

JULY 2010 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: August 3, 2010

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

DELTA MENDOTA CANAL AT CHECK 13 (O'NEILL)
(No. 6846

#### Joan Cochrane, Claimant, *vs.*State of Illinois, Department of Labor, Respondent.

*Opinion filed October 10, 1972.*

Kleiman, Cornfield & Feldman, Attorney for Claimant.

William J. Scott, Attorney General; Saul R. Wexler, Assistant Attorney General, for Respondent.

Per Curiam.
#### § 10.332 What additional medical information will OWCP require to support continuing payment of benefits?

In all cases of serious injury or disease, especially those requiring hospital treatment or prolonged care, OWCP will request detailed narrative reports from the attending physician at periodic intervals. The physician will be asked to describe continuing medical treatment for the condition accepted by OWCP, a prognosis, a description of work limitations, if any, and the physician's opinion as to the continuing causal relationship between the employee's condition and factors of his or her Federal employment.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-03-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             MAY-30-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-03-2000
<CASH>                                           1,960
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    6,446
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                     61,269
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                75,804
<PP&E>                                          35,098
<DEPRECIATION>                                   6,225
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 124,584
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           84,228
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             5
<OTHER-SE>                                      38,262
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   124,584
<SALES>                                        157,527
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               160,166
<CGS>                                           95,099
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   68,630
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   839
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               2,834
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (7,236)
<INCOME-TAX>                                        11
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (7,247)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (7,247)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (1.43)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (1.43)


</TABLE>
STORAGE - A.F. RESERVOIR CHANGE NEW MELONES NATURAL ACCUM * FULL

Day DONNELLS

RESERVOIR

BEARDSLEY

RESERVOIR

TOTAL A.F. C.F.S. INFLOW C.F.S RIVER C.F.S NATURAL 

1000 A.F.

1 32,842 71,369 104,211 594 299 1,256 1,555 402.4

2 34,079 70,685 104,764 553 279 1,442 1,721 405.8

3 35,307 70,090 105,397 633 319 1,406 1,725 409.2

4 36,600 69,416 106,016 619 312 1,487 1,799 412.8

5 38,227 68,683 106,910 894 451 1,248 1,699 416.2

6 40,253 67,915 108,168 1,258 634 1,314 1,948 420.0

7 42,580 67,131 109,711 1,543 778 1,324 2,102 424.2

8 44,535 66,376 110,911 1,200 605 1,400 2,005 428.2

9 46,037 65,569 111,606 695 350 1,367 1,717 431.6

10 47,332 64,788 112,120 514 259 1,221 1,480 434.5

11 48,409 63,944 112,353 233 117 1,309 1,426 437.3

12 49,337 63,141 112,478 125 63 1,171 1,234 439.8

13 50,191 62,457 112,648 170 86 1,156 1,242 442.2

14 51,240 61,794 113,034 386 195 1,073 1,268 444.8

15 52,918 61,061 113,979 945 476 1,080 1,556 447.9

16 55,068 60,420 115,488 1,509 761 1,204 1,965 451.7

17 56,974 60,057 117,031 1,543 778 1,297 2,075 455.9

18 58,625 60,217 118,842 1,811 913 1,073 1,986 459.8

19 60,039 61,181 121,220 2,378 1,199 758 1,957 463.7

20 61,318 62,155 123,473 2,253 1,136 655 1,791 467.2

21 61,094 64,281 125,375 1,902 959 729 1,688 470.6

22 60,460 66,667 127,127 1,752 883 623 1,506 473.6

23 60,349 68,658 129,007 1,880 948 737 1,685 476.9

24 60,767 70,204 130,971 1,964 990 605 1,595 480.1

25 61,605 71,420 133,025 2,054 1,036 662 1,698 483.4

26 62,739 72,585 135,324 2,299 1,159 617 1,776 487.0

27 63,241 74,111 137,352 2,028 1,022 599 1,621 490.2

28 62,977 76,269 139,246 1,894 955 510 1,465 493.1

29 62,451 78,285 140,736 1,490 751 650 1,401 495.9

30 61,775 80,235 142,010 1,274 642 425 1,067 498.0

31 61,103 82,213 143,316 1,306 658 527 1,185 500.3

Totals 39,699 50,938

Acre - Feet 101,036

* October 1, 2021 to date

Historical Archive and Report Database

Full Natural Flow At New Melones Dam

 May 2022 

 Run Date: 4/21/2023
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY HIGH

 403

 409

 402

 386

 387

 375

 373

 372

 376

 388

 382

 338

 327

 316

 329

 322

 329

 319

 319

 313

 334

 325

 322

 329

 324

 295

 300

 350

 347

 338

 328

 243

 243

 249

 246

 244

 244

 243

 242

 241

 240

 238

 233

 234

 231

 242

 247

 242

 246

 246

 249

 245

 245

 242

 235

 220

 224

 256

 254

 254

 251

 257

 307

 311

 309

 305

 302

 296

 304

 303

 305

 302

 297

 278

 273

 272

 281

 280

 284

 276

 277

 279

 285

 281

 280

 277

 267

 264

 269

 293

 293

 288

 288

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

OCTOBER 2006 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE:November 3, 2006

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

TDS

 206

 208

 207

 204

 203

 199

 204

 203

 204

 203

 200

 188

 185

 184

 190

 189

 192

 187

 187

 188

 192

 190

 189

 187

 181

 179

 182

 197

 197

 194

 194

TOTAL 8,926

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

DELTA MENDOTA CANAL AT HEADWORKS
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY HIGH

 856

 868

 865

 865

 829

 857

 882

 874

 906

 943

 600

 891

 847

 881

 880

 902

 909

 869

 877

 871

 909

 945

 953

 926

 886

 875

 894

 906

 893

 852

 791

 468

 463

 475

 480

 480

 479

 467

 475

 517

 542

 530

 539

 554

 536

 504

 511

 517

 524

 530

 524

 498

 506

 496

 482

 461

 457

 451

 447

 446

 421

 390

 608

 603

 613

 630

 601

 600

 601

 590

 625

 693

 558

 657

 637

 688

 627

 658

 664

 633

 634

 633

 627

 630

 624

 607

 589

 562

 589

 615

 632

 597

 507

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

DECEMBER 2003 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: January 15, 2004

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

DELTA MENDOTA CANAL AT CHECK 13 (O'NEILL)
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

DAY HIGH

 289

 283

 267

 264

 264

 231

 238

 271

 329

 311

 265

 259

 258

 225

 213

 205

 208

 221

 243

 258

 260

 261

 263

 261

 258

 248

 228

 226

 178

 158

 253

 251

 248

 247

 232

 208

 206

 220

 246

 250

 252

 210

 214

 212

 197

 196

 199

 207

 221

 237

 254

 255

 255

 255

 233

 189

 193

 170

 157

 150

 268

 265

 258

 255

 248

 221

 223

 238

 286

 285

 257

 236

 237

 218

 205

 198

 204

 213

 230

 248

 257

 258

 258

 258

 252

 219

 204

 196

 167

 153

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

APRIL 2006 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: May 2, 2006

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

DELTA MENDOTA CANAL AT CHECK 13 (O'NEILL)
### §8941. Repealed. Pub. L. 107–110, title X, §1011(5)(C), Jan. 8, 2002, 115 Stat. 1986

Section, Pub. L. 89–10, title XIV, §14701, as added Pub. L. 103–382, title I, §101, Oct. 20, 1994, 108 Stat. 3908; amended Pub. L. 104–134, title I, §101(d) [title VII, §703(b)(5)], Apr. 26, 1996, 110 Stat. 1321–211, 1321–255; renumbered title I, Pub. L. 104–140, §1(a), May 2, 1996, 110 Stat. 1327, related to evaluations.
A-AA+Skip to content

                  - Home
                  - Compendium Statistics
                  - Event
                  - Archives
                  - Glossary
                  - Help
                  - Contact
                  - Research on Disability

Annual Disability Statistics Compendium

              - Home /
              - Archives /
              - 2012 Compendium Statistics /
              - 2012 Social Security Administration Programs /
              - 2012 9.8a Supplemental Security Income—Change in the Number of Recipients of Federally Administered Payments, Total and Aged Eligible

## Table 9.8a: Supplemental Security Income—Change in the Number of Recipients of Federally Administered

----

----

 

----

#### 2012 Disability Compendium

                        - Home
                        - Compendium Statistics                           - Population and Prevelance
                          - Employment
                          - Time Trend Population Statistics
                          - Poverty
                          - Earnings
                          - Veterans
                          - Health Insurance Coverage
                          - Health
                          - Social Security Administration Programs
                          - Medicaid and Medicare
                          - Special Education
                          - Vocational Rehabilitation
                          - Federal Government Spending and Employment
                          - International Disability Statistics
                          - Population Statistics: Disability Type
                        - Event
                        - Archives                           - 2012 Compendium Statistics
                        - Glossary
                        - Help
                        - Contact
                        - Research on Disability

#### Funding for this project is made possible by:

 The Research and Training Center on Disability Statistics and Demographics (StatsRRTC), which is funded by the U.S. Department of Education, National Institute for Disability and Rehabilitation Research, under cooperative agreements H133B080012.

#### Stay Connected

**Institute on Disability**10 West Edge Drive, Suite 101Durham, NH 03824603.862.4320 | relay: 711 | [email protected]www.iod.unh.edu

© 2013. Institute on Disability.University of New Hampshire.
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Jose Luis CORADO, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 05-40378.

Conference Calendar.

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.

Decided Feb. 23, 2006.

James Lee Turner, Assistant U.S. Attorney, U.S. Attorney’s Office Southern District of Texas, Houston, TX, for PlaintiffAppellee.

Timothy William Crooks, Assistant Federal Public Defender, Marjorie A. Meyers, Federal Public Defender, Laura Fletcher Leavitt, Assistant Federal Public Defender, Federal Public Defender’s Office Southern District of Texas, Houston, TX, for Defendant-Appellant.

Before GARZA, DENNIS, and PRADO, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: *

Jose Luis Corado pleaded guilty to illegal reentry after deportation and was sentenced to 15 months of imprisonment and a three-year term of supervised release.

Corado argues for the first time on appeal that the district court erred in ordering him to cooperate in the collection of a DNA sample as a condition of supervised release and that this condition should therefore be vacated. This claim is DISMISSED for lack of jurisdiction because it is not ripe for review. *See United, States v. Riascos-Cuenu,*428 F.3d 1100, 1102 (5th Cir.2005), *petition for cert. filed*(Jan. 9, 2006) (No. 05-8662).

Also for the first time on appeal, Corado challenges the constitutionality of 8 U.S.C. § 1326(b). His constitutional challenge is foreclosed by *Almendarez-Torres v. United States,*523 U.S. 224, 235, 118 S.Ct. *6161219, 140 L.Ed.2d 350 (1998). Although Corado contends that *Almendarez-Torres*was incorrectly decided and that a majority of the Supreme Court would overrule *Almendarez-Torres*in light of *Apprendi v. New Jersey,*530 U.S. 466, 120 S.Ct. 2348, 147 L.Ed.2d 435 (2000), we have repeatedly rejected such arguments on the basis that *Almendarez-Torres*remains binding. *See United States v. Garza-Lopez,*410 F.3d 268, 276 (5th Cir.), *cert. denied,*— U.S.-, 126 S.Ct. 298, 163 L.Ed.2d 260 (2005). Corado properly concedes that his argument is foreclosed in light of *Almendarez-Torres*and circuit precedent, but he raises it here to preserve it for further review.

JUDGMENT AFFIRMED; APPEAL DISMISSED IN PART.

*

 Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.