alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
-78 -76 -74 -72

 38

 40

★

▲

▲

▲

▲

★ ▲ ▲ ▲ ▲

 500

 1000

 1500

 100

18 12 06 00

07/20

NOAA HYSPLIT MODEL

 Backward trajectory ending at 2300 UTC 20 Jul 06

 EDAS Meteorological Data

Source

★ at 38.86 N 77.06 W Meters AGL

★

■

■

■

■

★ ■ ■ ■ ■

★

● ●

● ●

★ ●

● ● ●
```

[Congressional Bills 116th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 5679 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

116th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 5679

 To amend the Homeland Security Act of 2002 to limit to five years the 
term of the Director of the Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Protection 
 Agency of the Department of Homeland Security, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            January 27, 2020

Mr. Katko (for himself, Mr. Richmond, and Mr. Langevin) introduced the 
    following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Homeland 
 Security, and in addition to the Committees on Oversight and Reform, 
and Energy and Commerce, for a period to be subsequently determined by 
the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall 
           within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To amend the Homeland Security Act of 2002 to limit to five years the 
term of the Director of the Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Protection 
 Agency of the Department of Homeland Security, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``CISA Director Reform Act''.

SEC. 2. CISA DIRECTOR TERM LIMITATION.

    (a) In General.--Paragraph (1) of section 2202(b) of the Homeland 
Security Act of 2002 (6 U.S.C. 652(b)) is amended by inserting at the 
end the following new sentence: ``Each Director shall serve for a term 
of five years.''.
    (b) Transition Rules.--The amendment made by subsection (a) shall 
take effect on the date of the enactment of this Act and apply 
beginning--
            (1) with the confirmation of the new Director of the 
        Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Protection Agency of the 
        Department of Homeland Security, or
            (2) on January 1, 2021,
whichever comes first.
                                 <all>
```
### §2014. Authorization of appropriations

There are authorized to be appropriated—

(1) for fiscal year 2007—

(A) $500,000 to establish the NMIC and Council; and

(B) such sums as are necessary for the operation of the NMIC and Council; and

(2) for each of fiscal years 2008 and 2009, such sums as are necessary for the operation of the NMIC and Council.

(Pub. L. 109–469, title X, §1005, Dec. 29, 2006, 120 Stat. 3539.)
### subpart 4—definitions
**EXHIBIT 12.2**

 

**FORM10-Q**

**PACCARFINANCIAL CORP.**

 

**COMPUTATION OF RATIO OF EARNINGS TO FIXEDCHARGES**

 

**PURSUANT TO THE SUPPORT AGREEMENT**

**BETWEEN THE COMPANY AND PACCAR**

(Millions of Dollars)

 
|                                |   | **Three Months Ended  March 31** |     |
|-------------------------------------|--------|----------------------------------|----------|
|                                |   | **2003**                         |     | **2002** |   |
|                                |   |                             |     |   |   |
| FIXED CHARGES                       |   |                             |     |   |   |
| Interest  expense                   |   | **$**                            | **22.8** |   | $ | 31.8 |   |
| Facility and  equipment rental      |   | **.5**                           |     | .4 |   |
|                                |   |                             |     |   |   |
| TOTAL FIXED  CHARGES                |   | **$**                            | **23.3** |   | $ | 32.2 |   |
|                                |   |                             |     |   |   |
| EARNINGS                            |   |                             |     |   |   |
| Income before  taxes                |   | **$**                            | **17.0** |   | $ | 3.6 |   |
| Depreciation                        |   | **5.8**                          |     | 3.0 |   |
|                                |   |                             |     |   |   |
|                                |   | **22.8**                         |     | 6.6 |   |
| Fixed charges                       |   | **23.3**                         |     | 32.2 |   |
|                                |   |                             |     |   |   |
| EARNINGS AS  DEFINED                |   | **$**                            | **46.1** |   | $ | 38.8 |   |
|                                |   |                             |     |   |   |
| RATIO OF EARNINGS TO FIXED  CHARGES |   | **1.98**                         | **x**    | 1.21 | x |

 

----
<PAGE>

                                                                    Exhibit 32.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Healthcare Services Group, Inc., a
Pennsylvania corporation (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June
30, 2006 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof
(the "Form 10-Q"), I, James L. DiStefano, Chief Financial Officer of the
Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

1.   The Form 10-Q fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
     15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d); and

2.   The information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material
     respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company


                                           /s/ James L. DiStefano
                                           -------------------------------------
                                           James L. DiStefano
                                           Chief Financial Officer
                                           July 21, 2006
```

[Congressional Bills 114th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 3861 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

114th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 3861

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to extend the exclusion for 
   employer-provided educational assistance to employer payments of 
                       qualified education loans.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            October 29, 2015

Mr. Rodney Davis of Illinois (for himself, Ms. Graham, Mr. Coffman, Mr. 
 Rouzer, Mr. Nolan, Ms. McSally, Mr. Garamendi, Mr. Murphy of Florida, 
and Mr. Blum) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                      Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to extend the exclusion for 
   employer-provided educational assistance to employer payments of 
                       qualified education loans.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Employer Participation in Student 
Loan Assistance Act''.

SEC. 2. EXCLUSION FOR EMPLOYER PAYMENT OF QUALIFIED EDUCATION LOANS.

    (a) In General.--Section 127(c)(1) of the Internal Revenue Code of 
1986 is amended by striking ``and'' at the end of subparagraph (A), by 
redesignating subparagraph (B) as subparagraph (C), and by inserting 
after subparagraph (A) the following new subparagraph:
                    ``(B) the payment by an employer, whether paid to 
                the employee or to a lender, of principal or interest 
                on any qualified education loan (as defined in section 
                221(d)(1)) incurred by the employee, and''.
    (b) Denial of Double Benefit.--Section 221(e)(1) of such Code is 
amended by inserting before the period at the end the following: ``, or 
for any amount which is excludable from gross income under section 
127(c)(1)(B)''.
    (c) Effective Date.--The amendments made by this section shall 
apply to payments made by employers after December 31, 2015.
                                 <all>
```
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY HIGH

 791

 765

 776

 776

 859

 809

 825

 795

 804

 767

 784

 820

 832

 826

 810

 780

 775

 789

 796

 765

 721

 717

 700

 703

 691

 666

 656

 615

 674

 633

 629

 423

 417

 414

 421

 411

 411

 381

 379

 379

 382

 393

 395

 392

 396

 391

 410

 408

 406

 402

 404

 394

 391

 396

 410

 423

 433

 448

 454

 477

 481

 482

 586

 576

 556

 557

 563

 522

 517

 508

 511

 495

 515

 584

 585

 572

 574

 553

 539

 549

 529

 520

 510

 509

 505

 507

 515

 513

 518

 526

 565

 564

 555

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

DECEMBER 2006 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: January 4, 2007

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

DELTA MENDOTA CANAL AT CHECK 13 (O'NEILL)
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY ELEV

 1,013.47

 1,013.36

 1,013.32

 1,013.18

 1,013.07

 1,012.94

 1,012.82

 1,012.63

 1,012.38

 1,012.27

 1,012.12

 1,011.93

 1,011.74

 1,011.47

 1,011.27

 1,011.15

 1,010.94

 1,010.55

 1,010.35

 1,010.28

 1,010.19

 1,010.06

 1,009.91

 1,009.69

 1,009.53

 1,009.35

 1,009.21

 1,009.13

 1,009.01

 1,008.84

 1,008.86

 1,598.1

 1,597.0

 1,596.6

 1,595.3

 1,594.2

 1,593.0

 1,591.8

 1,590.0

 1,587.6

 1,586.5

 1,585.1

 1,583.2

 1,581.4

 1,578.8

 1,576.9

 1,575.8

 1,573.8

 1,570.0

 1,568.1

 1,567.4

 1,566.6

 1,565.3

 1,563.9

 1,561.8

 1,560.3

 1,558.6

 1,557.2

 1,556.5

 1,555.3

 1,553.7

 1,553.9

STORAGE

-2.0

-1.1

-0.4

-1.4

-1.1

-1.3

-1.2

-1.8

-2.4

-1.1

-1.4

-1.8

-1.8

-2.6

-1.9

-1.2

-2.0

-3.7

-1.9

-0.7

-0.9

-1.2

-1.4

-2.1

-1.5

-1.7

-1.3

-0.8

-1.1

-1.6

+0.2

CHANGE

685

851

788

987

873

1,031

880

727

802

845

851

813

995

1,104

1,180

1,041

716

896

1,154

1,114

1,220

1,215

891

719

818

971

959

1,036

1,188

892

1,673

INFLOW

 1,670

 1,340

 949

 1,644

 1,390

 1,632

 1,428

 1,649

 1,972

 1,345

 1,545

 1,697

 1,871

 2,356

 2,107

 1,578

 1,668

 2,735

 2,074

 1,417

 1,623

 1,796

 1,566

 1,723

 1,531

 1,789

 1,591

 1,383

 1,718

 1,662

 1,474

POWER

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

SPILL

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

OUTLET

 38

 47

 34

 25

 19

 31

 34

 0

 44

 34

 34

 37

 43

 53

 40

 43

 62

 40

 43

 34

 31

 46

 46

 52

 55

 46

 40

 37

 46

 43

 104

C.F.S.

 .12

 .15

 .11

 .08

 .06

 .10

 .11

 .00

 .14

 .11

 .11

 .12

 .14

 .17

 .13

 .14

 .20

 .13

 .14

 .11

 .10

 .15

 .15

 .17

 .18

 .15

 .13

 .12

 .15

 .14

 .34

INCHES

 .00

 .00

 .03

 .00

 .00

 .23

 .04

 .18

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .25

 .25

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .01

 .00

 .00

 1.35

PRECIP

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

MARCH 2013 NEW MELONES LAKE DAILY OPERATIONS RUN DATE: August 12, 2013

IN LAKE

EVAPORATION

INCHES

C.F.S.

COMPUTED*

1000 ACRE-FEET

RELEASE - C.F.S.

TOTALS -46.2 29,915 51,923 0 0 1,281 4.15 2.34

ACRE-FEET -46,200 59,336 102,989 0 0 2,541

COMMENTS:

* COMPUTED INFLOW IS THE SUM OF CHANGE IN STORAGE, RELEASES AND EVAPORATION.

SUMMARY

RELEASE (ACRE-FEET)

POWER 102,989

SPILL 0

OUTLET

TOTAL

 0

 102,989

PRECIPITATION

THIS MONTH =

TO DATE =

 2.34

JULY 1, 2012 18.19

 1,600.1
§ 10.311 What are the special rules for the services of chiropractors? ( a ) The services of chiropractors that may be reimbursed are limited by the FECA to treatment to correct a spinal subluxation. The costs of physical and related laboratory tests performed by or required by a chiropractor to diagnose such a subluxation are also payable.
( b ) In accordance with 5 U.S.C. 8101(3), a diagnosis of spinal “subluxation as demonstrated by X-ray to exist” must appear in the chiropractor's report before OWCP can consider payment of a chiropractor's bill.
( c ) A chiropractor may interpret his or her x-rays to the same extent as any other physician. To be given any weight, the medical report must state that x-rays support the finding of spinal subluxation. OWCP will not necessarily require submittal of the x-ray, or a report of the x-ray, but the report must be available for submittal on request.
( d ) A chiropractor may also provide services in the nature of physical therapy under the direction of, and as prescribed by, a qualified physician.
### §6472. Definitions

In this part:

#### (1) Adult correctional institution

The term "adult correctional institution" means a facility in which persons (including persons under 21 years of age) are confined as a result of a conviction for a criminal offense.

#### (2) At-risk

The term "at-risk", when used with respect to a child, youth, or student, means a school aged individual who is at-risk of academic failure, dependency adjudication, or delinquency adjudication, has a drug or alcohol problem, is pregnant or is a parent, has come into contact with the juvenile justice system or child welfare system in the past, is at least 1 year behind the expected grade level for the age of the individual, is an English learner, is a gang member, has dropped out of school in the past, or has a high absenteeism rate at school.

#### (3) Community day program

The term "community day program" means a regular program of instruction provided by a State agency at a community day school operated specifically for neglected or delinquent children and youth.

#### (4) Institution for neglected or delinquent children and youth

The term "institution for neglected or delinquent children and youth" means—

(A) a public or private residential facility, other than a foster home, that is operated for the care of children who have been committed to the institution or voluntarily placed in the institution under applicable State law, due to abandonment, neglect, or death of their parents or guardians; or

(B) a public or private residential facility for the care of children who have been adjudicated to be delinquent or in need of supervision.

(Pub. L. 89–10, title I, §1432, as added Pub. L. 107–110, title I, §101, Jan. 8, 2002, 115 Stat. 1591; amended Pub. L. 114–95, title I, §1401(15), Dec. 10, 2015, 129 Stat. 1905.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Prior Provisions

A prior section 6472, Pub. L. 89–10, title I, §1432, as added Pub. L. 103–382, title I, §101, Oct. 20, 1994, 108 Stat. 3601, defined terms for this part, prior to the general amendment of this subchapter by Pub. L. 107–110.

A prior section 1432 of Pub. L. 89–10 was classified to section 2832 of this title, prior to the general amendment of Pub. L. 89–10 by Pub. L. 103–382.

#### Amendments

2015—Par. (2). Pub. L. 114–95 inserted "dependency adjudication, or delinquency adjudication," after "failure,", inserted "or child welfare system" after "juvenile justice system", and substituted "is an English learner" for "has limited English proficiency".

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date of 2015 Amendment

Amendment by Pub. L. 114–95 effective Dec. 10, 2015, except with respect to certain noncompetitive programs and competitive programs, see section 5 of Pub. L. 114–95, set out as a note under section 6301 of this title.
#### § 234.30 General.

When an applicant or an annuitant dies before being paid any annuities that may be due, the total of those annuities become payable to certain survivors in a lump-sum. Refer to § 234.31 through § 234.34 for information about when and to whom each type of unpaid annuity is payable. An application for an unpaid annuity must be filed within two years after the death of the person originally entitled to the annuity.

(Approved by the Office of Management and Budget under control numbers 3220-0031 and 3220-0032 and 3220-0042)

[51 FR 3036, Jan. 23, 1986, as amended at 52 FR 11017, Apr. 6, 1987]
MICHAEL STEVE COX, 

Petitioner, 

vs. 

THE SEVENTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT 

COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA, IN 

AND FOR THE COUNTY OF WHITE PINE, 

Respondent. 

MICHAEL STEVE COX, 

Petitioner, 

vs. 

THE SEVENTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT 

COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA, IN 

AND FOR THE COUNTY OF WHITE PINE, 

Respondent. 

No. 62079 

No. 62080 

ORDER DENYING WRIT PETITIONS 

These are seven original proper person petitions for 

extraordinary relief. The petitions are not consolidated. 

Having considered these petitions and supporting documents, 

we conclude that petitioner's arguments lack merit and that our 

intervention by way of extraordinary relief is not warranted. Accordingly, 

we deny the petitions. NRAP 21(b)(1); NRAP 21(c). 

Additionally, as demonstrated by the this order, petitioner has 

filed numerous meritless proper person petitions in this court seeking 

extraordinary writ relief and has further filed a number of similarly 

meritless appeals in this court. See Cox v. McDaniel, Docket No. 60056, 

Cox v. McDaniel, Docket No. 60151, Cox v. Bannister, Docket No. 60637, 

Cox v. State, Docket No. 61322. We caution appellant that continued filing 

of such meritless petitions and appeals may result in restrictions on his 

ability to file papers in this court in forma pauperis. See Jordan v. State, 

Dept. of Motor Vehicles & Pub. Safety, 121 Nev. 44, 110 P.3d 30 (2005), 

SUPREME COURT 

OF 

NEVADA 

(01 947A 

2 
abrogated on other grounds by Buzz Stew, LLC v. City of N. Las Vegas, 124 

Nev. 224, 181 P.3d 670 (2008). 

It is so ORDERED. 1 

Hardesty 

Parraguirre 

cc: Hon. James Todd Russell, District Judge 

Michael Steve Cox 

Attorney General/Carson City 

Carson City Clerk 

White Pine County Clerk 

Eighth District Court Clerk 

'In each of these writ petitions, this court has received petitioner's 

requests for leave to proceed in forma pauperis. We direct the clerk of this 

court to file the May 17, 2011, and the June 28, 2011, motions in Docket 

No. 58292; the March 19, 2012, motion in Docket No. 60404; the March 19, 

2012, motion in Docket No. 60406; the March 19, 2012, motion in Docket 

No. 60407; the March 19, 2012, motion in Docket No. 60409; the November 

20, 2012, motion in Docket No. 62079; and the November 20, 2012, motion 

in Docket No. 62080. Because petitioner was granted leave to proceed in 

forma pauperis in each of these writ petitions, no action is required on 

these motions. 

3
EXHIBIT 32.2
                                                                    ------------


             CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SS.1350, AS ADOPTED
              PURSUANT TO SS.906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

       In connection with the quarterly report of Spire Corporation (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q (the "Report") for the period ended September 30, 2008
as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, I,
Christian Dufresne, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer of the Company,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss.1350, as adopted pursuant to ss.906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

       1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

       2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.

Dated:    November 24, 2008         By: /s/ Christian Dufresne
                                        -------------------------------------
                                        Christian Dufresne, Ph. D.
                                        Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer





       A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or
other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the
signatures that appear in typed form within the electronic version of this
written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to the Company and
will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange
Commission or its staff upon request.
§ 229.67 Redetermination of reduction. ( a ) *General.* All cases reduced for worker's compensation or public disability benefit are recomputed in the second year after the year the reduction was first applied and every third year after that. The redetermined rate is effective with January of the year after the year the redetermination is made. The redetermined reduction is used only if it provides an annuity rate that is higher than the previous annuity rate.
( b ) *Redetermined average current earnings.* The average current earnings amount used in redetermining a worker's compensation or public disability benefit reduction is determined by multiplying the initial average current earnings amount by: ( 1 ) The average total wages (including wages that exceed the maximum used in computing social security benefits) of all persons for whom wages were reported to the Secretary of the Treasury for the year before the year or redetermination, divided by the average total wages for 1977 or, if later, the year before the year the reduction was first computed. If the result is not a multiple of $1.00, it is rounded to the next lower multiple of $1.00; or
( 2 ) If the reduction was first computed before 1978, the average taxable wages reported to the Secretary of Health and Human Services for the first quarter of 1977, divided by the average taxable wages for the first quarter of the year before the year the reduction was first computed. If the result is not a multiple of $1.00, it is rounded to the next lower multiple of $1.00.