### 3038 Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 12 / Wednesday, January 20, 2016 / Proposed Rules

(2) Packinghouses must not pack apple and pear fruit for other countries while packing for shipment to the
continental United States. All leaves
must be removed from the fruit to

remove Leucoptera malifoliella, and packinghouse culling and inspection procedures must be followed to remove fruit with pupae of Leucoptera malifoliella.

(3) All packed fruit intended for shipment to the continental United States must be safeguarded from infestation by fruit flies and other pests while at the packinghouse and during shipment to the continental United
States in accordance with the operational workplan.

(4) Apple and pear fruit must be held in a cold storage facility while awaiting export. If any other fruit from unregistered production sites are stored in the same facility, the apple and pear
fruit must be isolated from that other
fruit.

(5) Each shipping box must be marked with the identity of the packing facility, the production site, and grower or grower organization to ensure traceback.

(d) Mitigation for Mediterranean fruit fly. Apple and pear fruit being exported
from countries where Mediterranean fruit fly is known to occur must undergo
cold treatment in accordance with the phytosanitary treatments regulations in part 305 of this chapter. Cold treatment procedures and schedules will be included in the operational workplan.

(e) Phytosanitary inspection. After post-harvest processing, the NPPO of the exporting country or officials authorized by the NPPO of the exporting country must inspect the apple and pear fruit for signs of pest infestation and confirm absence of the pests listed in the operational workplan. Upon
detection of Adoxophyes orana, Alternaria gaisen, Argyrotaenia pulchellana, Ascochyta piricola, Ceratitis capitata, Grapholita (Cydia) funebrana, Leucoptera malifoliella, Monilinia fructigena and/or Monilinia polystroma in a consignment for export, the NPPO of the exporting country must reject the consignment and may, under conditions specified in the operational workplan, be required to suspend the production site and/or packinghouse from importation to the continental
United States for the remainder of that season. If any of these pests are found in a consignment at U.S. ports of entry, APHIS may, under conditions specified in the operational workplan, reject the consignment and suspend the production site and/or packinghouse from importation to the continental United States until an investigation is completed by the NPPO of the exporting country and APHIS. The investigation may include site visits by APHIS and/ or reports from the NPPO of the exporting country. Procedures for suspension of production sites and/or packinghouses will be detailed in the operational workplan. The exportation
to the continental United States of fresh apple and pear fruit from a suspended production site and/or packinghouse may resume in the next growing season if an investigation is conducted and APHIS and the NPPO of the exporting country agree that appropriate remedial
actions have been taken.

(f) Phytosanitary certificate. Each consignment of fresh apple or pear fruit must be accompanied by a phytosanitary certificate issued by the NPPO of the exporting country certifying that the fruit meets the conditions under this section for export
to the continental United States.

Done in Washington, DC, this 13th day of January 2016.
Kevin Shea,
Administrator, Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service.

[FR Doc. 2016–00992 Filed 1–19–16; 8:45 am]

**BILLING CODE 3410–34–P**

**DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION**

**Federal Aviation Administration**

**14 CFR Part 39**

**[Docket No. FAA–2015–8471; Directorate Identifier 2013–NM–153–AD]** 

**RIN 2120–AA64**

**Airworthiness Directives; Bombardier, Inc. Airplanes** 

**AGENCY :**  Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.

**ACTION :**  Notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM).

**SUMMARY :**  We propose to supersede Airworthiness Directive (AD) 2010–23– 19, that applies to certain Bombardier, Inc. Model CL–600–2C10 (Regional Jet Series 700, 701, and 702) airplanes, Model CL–600–2D15 (Regional Jet Series 705) airplanes, and Model CL– 600–2D24 (Regional Jet Series 900) airplanes. AD 2010–23–19 requires repetitive inspections for damage of the main landing gear (MLG) inboard doors and fairing, and corrective actions if necessary. Since we issued AD 2010– 23–19, we have received reports of the MLG failing to fully extend. This proposed AD would require repetitive inspections for damage of the MLG inboard doors, MLG fairing, and adjacent structures of the MLG inboard doors, and corrective actions if necessary; replacement of the MLG fairing seal; and a terminating action involving increasing the clearances between the MLG fairing and MLG door. This proposed AD would also add one airplane and remove others from the applicability. We are proposing this AD to prevent loss of controllability of the airplane during landing.

**DATES :**  We must receive comments on this proposed AD by March 7, 2016.

**ADDRESSES :**  You may send comments by any of the following methods:

• Federal eRulemaking Portal: Go to http://www.regulations.gov. Follow the instructions for submitting comments.

• Fax: 202–493–2251.

• Mail: U.S. Department of Transportation, Docket Operations, M– 30, West Building Ground Floor, Room W12–140, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE., Washington, DC 20590.

• Hand Delivery: U.S. Department of Transportation, Docket Operations, M– 30, West Building Ground Floor, Room W12–140, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE., Washington, DC, between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays.

For service information identified in this proposed AD, contact, Bombardier, Inc., 400 Co ˆ te-Vertu Road West, Dorval, Que  ́bec H4S 1Y9, Canada; telephone 514–855–5000; fax 514–855–7401; email thd.crj@aero.bombardier.com; Internet http://www.bombardier.com. You may view this referenced service information at the FAA, Transport Airplane Directorate, 1601 Lind Avenue SW., Renton, WA. For information on the availability of this material at the FAA,
call 425–227–1221.

Examining the AD Docket

You may examine the AD docket on
the Internet at http:// www.regulations.gov by searching for and locating Docket No. FAA–2015– 8471; or in person at the Docket Management Facility between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays. The AD docket contains this proposed AD, the regulatory evaluation, any comments received, and other information. The street address for the Docket Operations office (telephone 800–647–5527) is in
the **ADDRESSES** section. Comments will be available in the AD docket shortly after receipt.

**FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT :**  Ezra Sasson, Aerospace Engineer, Airframe and Mechanical Systems Branch, ANE– 171, FAA, New York Aircraft Certification Office, 1600 Stewart Avenue, Suite 410, Westbury, NY 11590; telephone 516–228–7320; fax

516–794–5531.


### 3039 Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 12 / Wednesday, January 20, 2016 / Proposed Rules

**SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION :** 

Comments Invited

We invite you to send any written relevant data, views, or arguments about this proposed AD. Send your comments
to an address listed under the

**ADDRESSES** section. Include ‘‘Docket No. FAA–2015–8471; Directorate Identifier 2013–NM–153–AD’’ at the beginning of your comments. We specifically invite comments on the overall regulatory, economic, environmental, and energy aspects of this proposed AD. We will consider all comments received by the closing date and may amend this proposed AD based on those comments.

We will post all comments we receive, without change, to http:// www.regulations.gov, including any personal information you provide. We will also post a report summarizing each
substantive verbal contact we receive about this proposed AD.

Discussion

On November 1, 2010, we issued AD 2010–23–19, Amendment 39–16508 (75 FR 68695, November 9, 2010). AD 2010– 23–19 requires actions intended to
address an unsafe condition on certain Bombardier, Inc. Model CL–600–2C10 (Regional Jet Series 700, 701, and 702) airplanes, Model CL–600–2D15 (Regional Jet Series 705) airplanes, and Model CL–600–2D24 (Regional Jet Series 900) airplanes.

Transport Canada Civil Aviation (TCCA), which is the aviation authority for Canada, has issued Airworthiness Directive CF–2010–36R1, dated July 18, 2013 (referred to after this as the Mandatory Continuing Airworthiness Information, or ‘‘the MCAI’’), to correct an unsafe condition for the specified products. The MCAI states:

Two cases of main landing gear (MLG) failure to fully extend have been reported. An MLG failing to extend may result in an unsafe asymmetric landing configuration.

Preliminary investigation has shown that
interference between the MLG door and the MLG fairing seal prevented the MLG door from opening.

This [Canadian] AD mandates the [detailed] inspection [for damage] and rectification [corrective action], as required, of the MLG fairing and seal, MLG door, and adjacent structures.

Data collected from the Original Issue of this [Canadian] AD shows potential deficiencies with the inspection. This [Canadian] AD is revised to update the applicability section and to introduce additional mitigating actions and the terminating action [a modification that includes related investigative actions, and corrective action if necessary].

The unsafe condition is the loss of controllability of the airplane during landing. Damage includes the following:

• For the MLG fairing seal: Cracks, cuts, or tears in the material of the MLG fairing seal, and cuts in the material
base.

• For the MLG inboard doors: Missing
or broken rollers on the MLG inboard door, missing stops, loose or missing fasteners from the stops, and damage (including, but not limited to, corrosion, cracking, and dents) along the edge of the MLG inboard door adjacent to the MLG fairing.

• For the MLG fairing: Missing forward and aft stops, loose or missing fasteners from the forward and aft stops, and damage (including, but not limited to, corrosion, cracking, and dents) along the edge of the MLG fairing adjacent to
the MLG inboard door.

• For the stops and wedges on the forward and aft spars: Missing stops, loose or missing fasteners from the stops, missing wedges, and loose or missing fasteners from the wedges.

Corrective actions include replacement of MLG fairing seals, and increasing the clearances between the MLG fairing and MLG door.

The terminating modification involves increasing the clearance between the left and right MLG fairings and the left and right MLG doors. Related investigative actions for the terminating modification include the following inspections:

• A detailed inspection of the MLG fairing for missing forward and aft stops, loose or missing fasteners from the forward and aft stops, and damage along the edge of the MLG fairing adjacent to
the MLG inboard door.

• A detailed visual inspection of the MLG inboard door for missing or broken rollers on the MLG inboard door, missing stops, loose or missing fasteners from the stops, and damage along the edge of the MLG inboard door adjacent to the MLG fairing.

• A detailed visual inspection on the stops and wedge on the forward and aft spars for missing stops, loose or missing fasteners from the stops, missing wedges, and loose or missing fasteners from the wedges.

• A liquid penetrant inspection or an eddy current inspection for cracks in the aft stop-fitting and stiffener of the
forward member of the MLG inboard
door.

You may examine the MCAI in the
AD docket on the Internet at http:// www.regulations.gov by searching for and locating Docket No. FAA–2015–

8471. Related Service Information Under 1

CFR Part 51

Bombardier, Inc. has issued Alert Service Bulletin A670BA–32–030, Revision D, dated August 6, 2013, which describes procedures for an inspection of the MLG inboard doors, MLG fairing, and adjacent structure of
the MLG inboard doors. This service bulletin also describes procedures for replacement of damaged MLG fairing seal(s) and for a clearance check of the MLG door or, if necessary, for removing and/or installing a MLG door.

Bombardier, Inc. has also issued
Bombardier Service Bulletin 670BA–32– 040, Revision E, dated November 13, 2014, which describes procedures for increasing the clearances between the fairing and the MLG inboard doors, and between the MLG fairing and adjacent
structure of the MLG doors. This service bulletin also describes procedures for adjusting the MLG doors.

This service information is reasonably available because the interested parties have access to it through their normal course of business or by the means
identified in the **ADDRESSES** section of
this NPRM.

FAA’s Determination and Requirements of This Proposed AD

This product has been approved by the aviation authority of another country, and is approved for operation
in the United States. Pursuant to our bilateral agreement with the State of Design Authority, we have been notified
of the unsafe condition described in the
MCAI and service information referenced above. We are proposing this AD because we evaluated all pertinent
information and determined an unsafe condition exists and is likely to exist or develop on other products of the same type design.

Costs of Compliance

We estimate that this proposed AD affects 416 airplanes of U.S. registry.

The actions that are required by AD 2010–23–19, Amendment 39–16508 (75 FR 68695, November 9, 2010), and retained in this proposed AD take about 1 work-hour per product, at an average labor rate of $85 per work-hour. Based on these figures, the estimated cost of the actions that are required by AD 2010–23–19 is $85 per inspection cycle for each product.

We also estimate that it would take about 50 work-hours for each product to comply with the basic requirements of this proposed AD. The average labor rate is $85 per work-hour. Based on these figures, we estimate the cost of this proposed AD on U.S. operators to


### 3040 Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 12 / Wednesday, January 20, 2016 / Proposed Rules

be $1,768,000, or $4,250 for each product.

In addition, we estimate that any necessary follow-on replacement actions
would take about 24 work-hours and require parts costing $2,626, for a cost of $4,666 per product. We have no way of determining the number of aircraft that might need these actions.

Authority for This Rulemaking

Title 49 of the United States Code specifies the FAA’s authority to issue rules on aviation safety. Subtitle I, section 106, describes the authority of
the FAA Administrator. ‘‘Subtitle VII: Aviation Programs,’’ describes in more detail the scope of the Agency’s authority.

We are issuing this rulemaking under the authority described in ‘‘Subtitle VII, Part A, Subpart III, Section 44701: General requirements.’’ Under that section, Congress charges the FAA with promoting safe flight of civil aircraft in air commerce by prescribing regulations for practices, methods, and procedures the Administrator finds necessary for safety in air commerce. This regulation is within the scope of that authority
because it addresses an unsafe condition that is likely to exist or develop on products identified in this rulemaking

action.

Regulatory Findings

We determined that this proposed AD would not have federalism implications
under Executive Order 13132. This proposed AD would not have a substantial direct effect on the States, on the relationship between the national Government and the States, or on the distribution of power and responsibilities among the various levels of government.

For the reasons discussed above, I certify this proposed regulation:

1. Is not a ‘‘significant regulatory action’’ under Executive Order 12866;

2. Is not a ‘‘significant rule’’ under the DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedures (44 FR 11034, February 26, 1979);

3. Will not affect intrastate aviation in Alaska; and

4. Will not have a significant economic impact, positive or negative, on a substantial number of small entities under the criteria of the Regulatory Flexibility Act.

List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39

Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation safety, Incorporation by reference, Safety.

The Proposed Amendment

Accordingly, under the authority delegated to me by the Administrator, the FAA proposes to amend 14 CFR part
39 as follows:

**PART 39—AIRWORTHINESS**
**DIRECTIVES**

■ 1. The authority citation for part 39
continues to read as follows:

Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701.

**§ 39.13 [Amended]**

■ 2. The FAA amends § 39.13 by removing Airworthiness Directive (AD) 2010–23–19, Amendment 39–16508 (75 FR 68695, November 9, 2010), and adding the following new AD:

Bombardier, Inc.: Docket No. FAA–2015– 8471; Directorate Identifier 2013–NM–

153–AD.

(a) Comments Due Date

We must receive comments by March 7,

2016.

(b) Affected ADs

This AD replaces AD 2010–23–19, Amendment 39–16508 (75 FR 68695, November 9, 2010).

(c) Applicability

This AD applies to the Bombardier, Inc. airplanes identified in paragraphs (c)(1) and (c)(2) of this AD, certificated in any category.

(1) Model CL–600–2C10 (Regional Jet Series 700, 701, & 702) airplanes, having serial numbers (S/Ns) 10002 through 10333
inclusive.

(2) Model CL–600–2D15 (Regional Jet Series 705) and CL–600–2D24 (Regional Jet Series 900) airplanes, having S/Ns 15001 through 15284 inclusive.

(d) Subject

Air Transport Association (ATA) of America Code 32: Landing gear.

(e) Reason

This AD was prompted by reports of the main landing gear (MLG) failing to fully extend. We are issuing this AD to prevent loss of controllability of the airplane during landing.

(f) Compliance

Comply with this AD within the compliance times specified, unless already
done.

(g) Retained Repetitive Inspections and Corrective Actions, With New Service Information and Revised Repair Instructions

(1) This paragraph restates the requirements of paragraph (g) of AD 2010– 23–19, Amendment 39–16508 (75 FR 68695, November 9, 2010), with new service information. For airplanes having S/Ns 10003 through 10313 inclusive, 15001 through 15238 inclusive, and 15240 through 15255 inclusive: Within 50 flight cycles after November 24, 2010 (the effective date of AD 2010–23–19), do the inspections specified in paragraphs (g)(1)(i) through (g)(1)(iv) of this AD, in accordance with ‘‘PART A— Inspection of the MLG Inboard Doors, MLG Fairing and Adjacent Structure’’ of the Accomplishment Instructions of Bombardier Alert Service Bulletin A670BA–32–030, Revision A, dated October 22, 2010; or
Bombardier Alert Service Bulletin A670BA– 32–030, Revision D, dated August 6, 2013; as applicable. As of the effective date of this AD, use only Bombardier Alert Service Bulletin A670BA–32–030, Revision D, dated August 6, 2013, to accomplish the actions required by this paragraph. Repeat the inspections thereafter at intervals not to exceed 600 flight hours.

(i) Do a detailed inspection for damage (including wear lines, cracks, fraying, tears, and evidence of chafing) of the rubber seal of the MLG fairing.

(ii) Do a detailed inspection for damage (including missing and broken rollers, loose and missing fasteners, and damaged and missing stops) of the MLG inboard doors, and for damage along the edge of the MLG inboard door adjacent to the MLG fairing.

(iii) Do a detailed inspection of the MLG fairing for damage (including missing forward and aft stops, and loose and missing fasteners), and for damage along the edge of the MLG fairing adjacent to the MLG door.

(iv) Do a detailed inspection for damage (including missing stops, loose and missing fasteners, and missing wedges) of the stops and wedge on the forward and aft spars.

(2) This paragraph restates the requirements of paragraph (h) of AD 2010– 23–19, Amendment 39–16508 (75 FR 68695, November 9, 2010), with revised service information. For airplanes not identified in paragraph (g)(1) of this AD, excluding the airplane having S/N 10002, and excluding airplanes having MLG fairing seals having part numbers (P/Ns) CC670–39244–5 and CC670–39244–6: Within 600 flight hours after November 24, 2010 (the effective date of AD 2010–23–19), do the inspections specified in paragraphs (g)(2)(i) through (g)(2)(iv) of this AD, in accordance with ‘‘PART A—Inspection of the MLG Inboard Doors, MLG Fairing and Adjacent Structure’’ of the Accomplishment Instructions of
Bombardier Alert Service Bulletin A670BA– 32–030, Revision A, dated October 22, 2010;
or Bombardier Alert Service Bulletin A670BA–32–030, Revision D, dated August 6, 2013. As of the effective date of this AD, use only Bombardier Alert Service Bulletin A670BA–32–030, Revision D, dated August 6, 2013, to accomplish the actions required by this paragraph. Repeat the inspections thereafter at intervals not to exceed 600 flight
hours.

(i) Do a detailed inspection for damage (including wear lines, cracks, fraying, tears, and evidence of chafing) of the rubber seal of the MLG fairing.

(ii) Do a detailed inspection for damage (including missing and broken rollers, loose and missing fasteners, and damaged and missing stops) of the MLG inboard doors, and for damage along the edge of the MLG inboard door adjacent to the MLG fairing.

(iii) Do a detailed inspection of the MLG fairing for damage (including missing forward and aft stops, and loose and missing fasteners), and for damage along the edge of the MLG fairing adjacent to the MLG door.

(iv) Do a detailed inspection for damage (including missing stops, loose and missing


### 3041 Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 12 / Wednesday, January 20, 2016 / Proposed Rules

fasteners, and missing wedges) of the stops and wedge on the forward and aft spars.

(3) This paragraph restates the requirements of paragraph (i) of AD 2010– 23–19, Amendment 39–16508 (75 FR 68695, November 9, 2010), with revised service information. If damage to only the rubber seal on the MLG fairing is found during any inspection required by paragraph (g)(1) or (g)(2) of this AD, before further flight, do either action specified in paragraph (g)(3)(i) or (g)(3)(ii) of this AD.

(i) Replace the rubber seal on the MLG fairing with a new rubber seal, in accordance with ‘‘PART B—Replacement of the Forward Rubber Seal on the MLG Fairing’’ of the Accomplishment Instructions of Bombardier Alert Service Bulletin A670BA–32–030, Revision A, dated October 22, 2010; or the Accomplishment Instructions of Bombardier Alert Service Bulletin A670BA–32–030, Revision D, dated August 6, 2013. As of the effective date of this AD, use only
Bombardier Alert Service Bulletin A670BA– 32–030, Revision D, dated August 6, 2013, to accomplish the actions required by this paragraph.

(ii) Remove the MLG inboard door, in
accordance with ‘‘PART C—Removal of MLG Inboard Door’’ of the Accomplishment
Instructions of Bombardier Alert Service Bulletin A670BA–32–030, Revision A, dated October 22, 2010; or Bombardier Alert Service Bulletin A670BA–32–030, Revision D, dated August 6, 2013. For airplanes on which the MLG inboard door is re-installed,
do the installation of the MLG inboard door
in accordance with ‘‘PART D—Installation of MLG Inboard Door’’ of the Accomplishment
Instructions of Bombardier Alert Service Bulletin A670BA–32–030, Revision A, dated October 22, 2010; or Bombardier Alert Service Bulletin A670BA–32–030, Revision D, dated August 6, 2013. As of the effective date of this AD, use only Bombardier Alert Service Bulletin A670BA–32–030, Revision D, dated August 6, 2013, to accomplish the actions required by this paragraph.

(4) This paragraph restates the requirements of paragraph (j) of AD 2010–23– 19, Amendment 39–16508 (75 FR 68695, November 9, 2010), with revised repair instructions. If damage other than the damage identified in paragraph (g)(3) of this AD is found during any inspection required by paragraph (g)(1) or (g)(2) of this AD, before further flight, contact the Bombardier Regional Aircraft Customer Response Center for repair instructions and do the repair; or repair using a method approved by the Manager, New York ACO, ANE–170, FAA; or Transport Canada Civil Aviation (TCCA); or Bombardier, Inc.’s TCCA Design Approval Organization (DAO).

(h) New Inspections of MLG Fairing Seal Having P/N CC670–39244–1 or CC670–

39244–2

For airplanes on which an MLG fairing seal having P/N CC670–39244–1 or P/N CC670– 39244–2 is installed: At the applicable time specified in paragraph (i)(1) of this AD, do the inspections specified in paragraphs (h)(1) through (h)(4) of this AD, in accordance with the Accomplishment Instructions of
Bombardier Alert Service Bulletin A670BA– 32–030, Revision D, dated August 6, 2013, except as specified in paragraph (o) of this AD. Repeat the inspections thereafter at the time specified in paragraph (i)(2) of this AD.

(1) Do a detailed inspection for damage (including cracking, cuts, and tears in the material (fabric/rubber)) of the MLG fairing
and seal.

(2) Do a detailed inspection for damage (including missing and broken rollers, loose and missing fasteners, and damaged and missing stops) of the MLG inboard doors, and for damage along the edge of the MLG inboard door adjacent to the MLG fairing.

(3) Do a detailed inspection of the MLG fairing for damage (including missing forward and aft stops, and loose and missing fasteners), and for damage (including, but not limited to, corrosion, cracking, and dents) along the edge of the MLG fairing adjacent to
the MLG door.

(4) Do a detailed inspection for damage (including missing stops, loose and missing fasteners, and missing wedges) of the stops and wedge on the forward and aft spars.

(i) New Compliance Times for the Actions Required by Paragraph (h) of This AD

This paragraph specifies the compliance times for the actions required by paragraph (h) of this AD.

(1) The initial compliance time is specified in paragraphs (i)(1)(i) and (i)(1)(ii) of this AD.

(i) For airplanes having S/Ns 10002 through 10313 inclusive; 15001 through 15238 inclusive; and 15240 through 15255 inclusive: Within 50 flight cycles after the
effective date of this AD.

(ii) For all other airplane serial numbers: Within 600 flight hours after the effective
date of this AD.

(2) Repeat the inspections specified in paragraph (h) of this AD at the earlier of the times specified in paragraphs (i)(2)(i) and (i)(2)(ii) of this AD.

(i) Repeat the inspections within 200 flight
hours after the effective date of this AD. Repeat the inspections thereafter at intervals not to exceed 200 flight hours.

(ii) Repeat the inspections within 600 flight hours after the most recent inspection done in accordance with the requirements of AD 2010–23–19, Amendment 39–16508 (75 FR 68695, November 9, 2010). Repeat the inspections thereafter at intervals not to exceed 200 flight hours.

(j) New Corrective Actions

(1) If any damage to the MLG fairing seal is found during any inspection required by paragraph (h) of this AD: Before further flight, do the actions specified in paragraph (j)(1)(i) or (j)(1)(ii) of this AD, except as specified in paragraph (o) of this AD.

(i) Before further flight, remove the MLG inboard doors, in accordance with Part C of the Accomplishment Instructions of
Bombardier Alert Service Bulletin A670BA– 32–030, Revision D, dated August 6, 2013. For airplanes on which the MLG inboard door is re-installed, do the installation of the
MLG inboard door in accordance with Part D of the Accomplishment Instructions of
Bombardier Alert Service Bulletin A670BA– 32–030, Revision D, dated August 6, 2013.

(ii) Before further flight, replace the MLG fairing seals, in accordance with Part E of the Accomplishment Instructions of Bombardier Alert Service Bulletin A670BA–32–030, Revision D, dated August 6, 2013. Within 200 flight hours after installing the MLG fairing seals, do the actions required by paragraph (h) of this AD.

(2) If any damage other than that specified in paragraph (j)(1) of this AD is found, or if parts or fasteners are found missing, during any inspection required by paragraph (h) of this AD, before further flight, repair using a method approved by the Manager, New York ACO, ANE–170, FAA; or TCCA; or Bombardier, Inc.’s TCCA DAO.

(k) New Replacement of MLG Fairing Seals

Within 2,500 flight hours or 12 months, whichever occurs first, after the effective date of this AD: Replace any MLG fairing seals having P/Ns CC670–39244–1 and CC670–
39244–2 with P/Ns CC670–39244–5 and CC670–39244–6, respectively, in accordance with Part E of the Accomplishment
Instructions of Bombardier Alert Service Bulletin A670BA–32–030, Revision D, dated August 6, 2013, except as specified in paragraph (o) of this AD.

(l) New MLG Fairing Seal Post-Replacement Inspections

Within 600 flight hours after installing fairing seals having P/Ns CC670–39244–5 or CC670–39244–6: Do the inspections specified in paragraphs (h)(1) through (h)(4) of this AD, in accordance with the Accomplishment
Instructions of Bombardier Alert Service Bulletin A670BA–32–030, Revision D, dated August 6, 2013. If any damage to the MLG fairing seal is found during any inspection required by this paragraph: Before further flight, do the applicable actions specified in paragraphs (j)(1) or (j)(2) of this AD. If no damage is found during any inspection required by this paragraph, repeat the inspections specified in paragraphs (h)(1) through (h)(4) of this AD thereafter at intervals not to exceed 600 flight hours, except as provided in paragraph (m) of this

AD.

(m) New Exception to MLG Fairing Seal Post-Replacement Inspections

After accomplishment of the initial inspections specified in paragraph (l) of this AD, removal of the MLG inboard door, in accordance with the Accomplishment
Instructions of Bombardier Alert Service Bulletin A670BA–32–030, Revision D, dated August 6, 2013, defers the repetitive inspections required by paragraph (l) of this
AD until the MLG inboard door is reinstalled. For airplanes on which the MLG inboard door is re-installed, do the
installation of the MLG inboard door in accordance with the Accomplishment
Instructions of Bombardier Alert Service Bulletin A670BA–32–030, Revision D, dated August 6, 2013, except as specified in paragraph (o) of this AD; and before the accumulation of 600 flight hours on the MLG inboard door since the actions required by paragraph (k) of this AD were accomplished, do the inspections specified in paragraph (l) of this AD, and repeat the inspections thereafter at the applicable time specified in paragraph (l) of this AD.


### 3042 Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 12 / Wednesday, January 20, 2016 / Proposed Rules

(n) New Terminating Modification

Within 6,600 flight hours or 36 months,
whichever occurs first after the effective date of this AD: Modify the airplane by increasing the clearance between the left and right MLG fairings and the left and right MLG doors; and do all applicable related investigative and corrective actions; in accordance with the Accomplishment Instructions of Bombardier Service Bulletin 670BA–32–040, Revision E, dated November 13, 2014, except as provided by paragraph (o) of this AD. Do all applicable related investigative and corrective actions before further flight. If an MLG door has been removed, the modification may be delayed until the MLG
door is re-installed in accordance with the Accomplishment Instructions of Bombardier Alert Service Bulletin A670BA–32–030, Revision D, dated August 6, 2013. Accomplishing this modification terminates the requirements of paragraphs (g) through (m) of this AD for that MLG door.

(o) Exceptions to Bombardier Service
Bulletins

Where Bombardier Alert Service Bulletin A670BA–32–030, Revision D, dated August 6, 2013; and Bombardier Service Bulletin 670BA–32–040, Revision E, dated November 14, 2014; specify to contact the Bombardier Customer Response Center for an analysis or to get an approved disposition, repair using a method approved by the Manager, New York ACO, ANE–170, FAA; or TCCA; or Bombardier, Inc.’s TCCA DAO.

(p) Credit for Previous Actions

(1) This paragraph restates the provisions of paragraph (l) of AD 2010–23–19, Amendment 39–16508 (75 FR 68695, November 9, 2010), with additional service information. This paragraph provides credit for the actions required by paragraph (g) of this AD, if those actions were performed before November 24, 2010 (the effective date of AD 2010–23–19) using Bombardier Alert Service Bulletin A670BA–32–030, dated October 18, 2010; or Bombardier Alert Service Bulletin A670BA–32–030, Revision A, dated October 22, 2010.

(2) This paragraph provides credit for the corresponding actions required by paragraphs (g)(1), (g)(2), (g)(3)(i), (g)(3)(ii), (h), (j)(1), (k), (l), (m), and (n) of this AD, if those actions were performed before the effective date of this AD using the service bulletins specified in paragraph (p)(2)(i), (p)(2)(ii), or (p)(2)(iii) of this AD.

(i) Bombardier Alert Service Bulletin A670BA–32–030, Revision A, dated October

22, 2010.

(ii) Bombardier Alert Service Bulletin A670BA–32–030, Revision B, dated November 3, 2011.

(iii) Bombardier Alert Service Bulletin A670BA–32–030, Revision C, dated March

13, 2013.

(3) This paragraph provides credit for the corresponding actions required by paragraph (n) of this AD, if those actions were performed before the effective date of this AD using the service information specified in paragraph (p)(3)(i), (p)(3)(ii), (p)(3)(iii), or (p)(3)(iv) of this AD.

(i) Bombardier Service Bulletin 670BA–32– 040, Revision A, dated March 13, 2013. (i) Bombardier Service Bulletin 670BA–32– 040, Revision B, dated August 6, 2013.

(iii) Bombardier Service Bulletin 670BA– 32–040, Revision C, dated November 1, 2013.

(iv) Bombardier Service Bulletin 670BA– 32–040, Revision D, dated July 2, 2014.

(q) Other FAA AD Provisions

The following provisions also apply to this

AD:

(1) Alternative Methods of Compliance (AMOCs): The Manager, New York ACO, ANE–170, FAA, has the authority to approve AMOCs for this AD, if requested using the procedures found in 14 CFR 39.19. In accordance with 14 CFR 39.19, send your request to your principal inspector or local Flight Standards District Office, as appropriate. If sending information directly to the ACO, send it to ATTN: Program Manager, Continuing Operational Safety, FAA, New York ACO, 1600 Stewart Avenue, Suite 410, Westbury, NY 11590; telephone 516–228–7300; fax 516–794–5531. Before using any approved AMOC, notify your appropriate principal inspector, or lacking a principal inspector, the manager of the local flight standards district office/certificate holding district office. The AMOC approval letter must specifically reference this AD.

(2) Contacting the Manufacturer: As of the effective date of this AD, for any requirement

in this AD to obtain corrective actions from a manufacturer, the action must be accomplished using a method approved by the Manager, New York ACO, ANE–170, FAA; or TCCA; or Bombardier, Inc.’s TCCA DAO. If approved by the DAO, the approval must include the DAO-authorized signature.

(r) Related Information

(1) Refer to Mandatory Continuing Airworthiness Information (MCAI) Canadian Airworthiness Directive CF–2010–36R1, dated July 18, 2013, for related information. This MCAI may be found in the AD docket

on the Internet at http://www.regulations.gov by searching for and locating Docket No.

FAA–2015–8471.

(2) For service information identified in this AD, contact Bombardier, Inc., 400 Co ˆ teVertu Road West, Dorval, Que  ́bec H4S 1Y9, Canada; telephone 514–855–5000; fax 514– 855–7401; email thd.crj@ aero.bombardier.com; Internet http://

www.bombardier.com. You may view this referenced service information at the FAA, Transport Airplane Directorate, 1601 Lind Avenue SW., Renton, WA. For information on the availability of this material at the FAA, call 425–227–1221.

Issued in Renton, Washington, on January

6, 2016.
Victor Wicklund,
Acting Manager, Transport Airplane Directorate, Aircraft Certification Service.

[FR Doc. 2016–00698 Filed 1–19–16; 8:45 am]

**BILLING CODE 4910–13–P DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION** 

**Federal Aviation Administration**

**14 CFR Part 39**

**[Docket No. FAA–2015–8472; Directorate Identifier 2014–NM–106–AD]** 

**RIN 2120–AA64**

**Airworthiness Directives; Fokker Services B.V. Airplanes** 

**AGENCY :**  Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.

**ACTION :**  Notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM).

**SUMMARY :**  We propose to adopt a new airworthiness directive (AD) for all
Fokker Services B.V. Model F.28 Mark 1000, 2000, 3000, and 4000 airplanes. This proposed AD was prompted by a design review, that revealed a hot spot may develop in the main fuel tank
under certain failure conditions of the solenoid of the level control pilot valve,
the reed switch of the main tank overflow valve, the level float switch of the collector tank, or the solenoid of the main tank fueling shut-off valve. This proposed AD would require installing fuses in the wiring of the solenoid of the level control pilot valve, the reed switch of the main tank overflow valve, the level float switch of the collector tank,
and the solenoid of the main tank fueling shut-off valve, as applicable. This proposed AD would also require accomplishing concurrent actions and revising the airplane maintenance or inspection program, as applicable, by incorporating fuel airworthiness limitation items and critical design configuration control limitations (CDCCLs). We are proposing this AD to prevent an ignition source in the main fuel tank vapor space, which could result in a fuel tank explosion and consequent loss of the airplane.

**DATES :**  We must receive comments on this proposed AD by March 7, 2016.

**ADDRESSES :**  You may send comments, using the procedures found in 14 CFR 11.43 and 11.45, by any of the following
methods:

• Federal eRulemaking Portal: Go to http://www.regulations.gov. Follow the instructions for submitting comments.

• Fax: 202–493–2251.

• Mail: U.S. Department of Transportation, Docket Operations, M– 30, West Building Ground Floor, Room W12–140, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE., Washington, DC 20590.

• Hand Delivery: U.S. Department of Transportation, Docket Operations, M– 30, West Building Ground Floor, Room W12–140, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE.,