alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
May 22 2014 03:05PM CityofAtka 9078392234 page

Administrator

721 Sesame Street 2C

Anchorage, Alaska 99503

Phone: 907.522.0384

Email: dirksjuliea@gmail.c.om

May 22, 2014

EAS& Domestic Analysis Division

Office of Aviation Analysis

USDepartment of Transportation

400 7'h St. 5W, Room 6401

Wasnington, DC20590

RE: Atka Essential Air Service

Docket DOT-OST-1995-363

p 2:

Atka Office

PO Box 47070

'")'l-fl.tk.:l, Alaska 99547

t"pffone: 907.839-2233

fu: ~lOI-839-2234

The City of Atka supports tne proposal of Grant AViation to continue providing EssentialAir

Service between Dutch Harbor and Atka for the period October 1, 2014 through September 3D,

2016.

For the most part Grant Aviation has done a more than acceptable job of providing air services

to Atka over the past two years. The only real problems experienced by passengers and the

community have occurred when planes breakdown. Becauseof where the plane is, it cantake

a long time to get repairs done. There have been afew occasions where it took about two

weeks. Grant does not appear to have any planes available to send to Dutch Harbor while

repairs are being made. Being without air servicefor that long is a concern to local residents.

Thank you for the opportunity to comment.

Signed,

Christopher Maly

Mayor

Cc: Julie Dirks, City Administrator

Atka City Council
#### Mary L. Town, Plaintiff, v. Dunkirk Printing Company, Defendant.

Plaintiff’s exceptions overruled, motion for new trial denied, with costs, and judgment directed for the defendant upon the verdict, with costs. All concurred.
EXHIBIT 32



McDATA Corporation



Certification



Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

(Subsections
(a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code)



Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code), each of the undersigned officers of McDATA
Corporation, a Delaware corporation (the Company), does hereby certify, to such officers knowledge, that:



The Companys Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended October 31, 2005 (the Report) fully complies with the requirements
of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                        |  |  |  |                                                                          
|----------------------- |  |  |  | -------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                        |  | 
|Dated: December 9, 2005 |  |  |  | /s/ JOHN A. KELLEY, JR.                                                  
|                        |  |  |  | John A. Kelley, Jr. Chairman, President and Chief
Executive Officer      
|                        |  | 
|Dated: December 9, 2005 |  |  |  | /s/SCOTT BERMAN                                                          
|                        |  |  |  | Scott Berman Senior Vice President of Finance
and Chief Financial Officer
§ 1011.215 How will the employer complete the application for the HIRE Vets Medallion Award? ( a ) VETS will require all applicants to provide information to establish their eligibility for the HIRE Vets Medallion Award.
( b ) VETS may request additional information in support of the application for the HIRE Vets Medallion Award.
( c ) The chief executive officer, the chief human resources officer, or an equivalent official of each employer applicant must attest under penalty of perjury that the information the employer has submitted in its application is accurate.
( d ) Interested employers can access the application form via the HIRE Vets Web site accessible from *https://www.hirevets.gov/ .*
( e ) Applicants will complete the application form and submit it electronically.
( f ) Applicants who need a reasonable accommodation in accessing the application form, submitting the application form, or submitting the application fee may contact VETS at (202) 693-4700 or TTY (877) 889-5627 (these are not toll-free numbers).
( g ) Should the information provided on the application be deemed incomplete, VETS will attempt to contact the applicant. The applicant must respond with the additional information necessary to complete the application form within 5 business days or VETS will deny the application.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>               5
                                                      
													 
<S>                         <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                 12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>             JUN-28-1997
<PERIOD-END>                  JUN-28-1997
<CASH>                            389,000
<SECURITIES>                        0
<RECEIVABLES>                  47,538,000
<ALLOWANCES>                      872,000
<INVENTORY>                    23,299,000
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                1,237,000
<PP&E>                         43,759,000
<DEPRECIATION>                 32,935,000
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                107,253,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>          57,652,000
<BONDS>                       126,671,000
<COMMON>                          254,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>               0
<PREFERRED>                    85,689,000
<OTHER-SE>                          0    
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>  107,253,000
<SALES>                       101,703,000  
<TOTAL-REVENUES>              208,583,000  
<CGS>                          82,699,000
<TOTAL-COSTS>                 163,926,000  
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                    0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                    0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>             18,317,000
<INCOME-PRETAX>               (13,082,000)
<INCOME-TAX>                       73,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                 0
<DISCONTINUED>                      0      
<EXTRAORDINARY>                     0
<CHANGES>                       7,420,000
<NET-INCOME>                   (5,735,000)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                       (7.09)
<EPS-DILUTED>                       0
        

</TABLE>
#### Isadore Blumberg, Appellant, v. Yorkshire Insurance Co., Ltd., et al., Respondents.

Judgment affirmed, with costs. All concur. (The judgment is for defendant for no cause of action in an action under a fire insurance policy.) Present — Taylor, P. J., "MeCurn, Love, Vaughan and Kimball, JJ. [See 274 App. Div. 851.]
(No. 6907

#### Cabrini-Green Community Market, Inc., d/b/a/ Jet Community Market, Claimant, *vs.*State of Illinois, Department of Public Aid, Respondent.

*178
      *Opinion filed January 9, 1973.*

Cabrini-Green Community Market, Inc., Claimant, pro se.

William J. Scott, Attorney General; Saul R. Wexler, Assistant Attorney General, for Respondent.

Per Curiam.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

DAY HIGH

 340

 346

 347

 339

 333

 335

 330

 330

 323

 330

 328

 326

 319

 314

 314

 308

 310

 308

 304

 301

 300

 297

 296

 295

 297

 295

 292

 286

 275

 261

 325

 326

 305

 315

 305

 313

 305

 286

 272

 270

 314

 309

 300

 290

 286

 262

 275

 266

 259

 253

 274

 258

 271

 266

 266

 249

 251

 235

 239

 213

 334

 333

 331

 331

 325

 326

 322

 314

 305

 312

 321

 318

 311

 306

 300

 296

 296

 292

 289

 285

 289

 287

 285

 283

 283

 278

 275

 274

 265

 245

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

APRIL 2008 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: May 5, 2008

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

FARRAR PARK AT DUTCH SLOUGH
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY ELEV

 122.35

 123.16

 122.81

 122.80

 122.62

 122.04

 122.18

 122.28

 123.26

 123.09

 123.14

 123.41

 123.29

 123.22

 122.99

 122.83

 122.14

 121.33

 121.80

 122.14

 122.16

 123.31

 123.80

 123.99

 124.09

 124.09

 123.69

 122.59

 122.49

 122.54

 122.44

 7,499

 7,866

 7,706

 7,701

 7,620

 7,359

 7,422

 7,467

 7,913

 7,833

 7,857

 7,984

 7,927

 7,894

 7,787

 7,715

 7,404

 7,060

 7,257

 7,404

 7,413

 7,937

 8,167

 8,256

 8,306

 8,306

 8,115

 7,607

 7,562

 7,584

 7,539

STORAGE

-171

+367

-160

-5

-81

-261

+63

+45

+446

-80

+24

+127

-57

-33

-107

-72

-311

-344

+197

+147

+9

+524

+230

+89

+50

+0

-191

-508

-45

+22

-45

CHANGE

847

1,120

850

927

886

790

949

937

1,155

877

925

980

882

815

799

818

671

674

960

812

734

1,054

917

836

813

807

732

566

787

829

820

INFLOW

 838

 840

 835

 834

 832

 827

 822

 819

 835

 821

 817

 820

 815

 736

 757

 758

 732

 751

 765

 642

 633

 695

 707

 731

 728

 726

 731

 725

 714

 726

 762

POWER

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

SPILL

 60

 60

 60

 60

 60

 60

 60

 60

 60

 60

 60

 60

 60

 60

 60

 60

 60

 60

 60

 60

 60

 60

 60

 60

 60

 60

 60

 60

 60

 60

 60

HATCHERY

 0

 0

 1

 1

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 0

 0

 0

 0

 1

 1

 1

 0

 1

 1

C.F.S.

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

JANUARY 2009 LAKE NATOMA DAILY OPERATIONS RUN DATE: February 2, 2009

IN LAKE

EVAP

C.F.S.

COMPUTED*

ACRE-FEET

RELEASE - C.F.S.

TOTALS -131 26,569 23,774 0 1,860 19

ACRE-FEET -131 52,700 47,156 0 3,689 38

COMMENTS:

* COMPUTED INFLOW IS THE SUM OF CHANGE IN STORAGE, RELEASES AND EVAPORATION.

SUMMARY

RELEASES (ACRE-FEET)

POWER 47,156

SPILL 0

FOLSOM SOUTH CANAL

HATCHERY

 1,950

 3,689

 7,670

FOLSOM

SOUTH 

CANAL

 35

 35

 35

 35

 35

 35

 35

 35

 35

 35

 35

 35

 35

 35

 35

 35

 35

 35

 35

 35

 35

 35

 34

 0

 0

 20

 36

 36

 36

 31

 20

 983

 1,950

(1)

(1) INCHES OF EVAPORATION TAKEN FROM FOLSOM PAN.

RELEASES (ACRE-FEET)

TOTAL 52,795
###### Editorial Note on Part 44

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 44 appear by T.D. ATF-464, 66 FR 43480, Aug. 20, 2001, and T.D. ATF-480, 67 FR 30801-30803, May 8, 2002.

#### § 44.181 Packages.

All tobacco products and cigarette papers and tubes must, before removal or transfer under this subpart, be put up by the manufacturer in packages that bear the label or notice, tax classification, and mark, as required by this subpart. For purposes of this subpart, the package does not include the cellophane or other transparent exterior wrapping material.

[78 FR 38574, June 27, 2013]
Editorial Note on Part 40
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 40 appear by T.D. ATF-460, 66 FR 39094-39096, July 27, 2001; T.D. ATF-464, 66 FR 43479, Aug. 20, 2001; and T.D. TTB-91, 76 FR 5479, Feb. 1, 2011.

§ 40.502 Factory premises. ( a ) *General.* The premises used by a manufacturer of processed tobacco to conduct such business must be described on its permit and such premises must include any physical location or building used for: Manufacturing and storing processed tobacco; storing materials, equipment, and supplies related to or used in the manufacturing and storage of processed tobacco; and carrying on activities in connection with the manufacturing and storage of processed tobacco. The premises may consist of more than one building, or portions of buildings, which need not be contiguous or located in the same city, town, village, or State. The manufacturer must designate a central location as a repository for the records required under this subpart. The application for the permit filed under § 40.492 must describe the buildings or portions of buildings by street address (number, street, city or equivalent, and State). The permit application must include a diagram, in duplicate, showing the following information, if applicable: ( 1 ) The identification of each building by a letter, number, or similar designation if the factory is in more than one building and each building is not identifiable by a separate street address; and
( 2 ) The particular floor or floors, or room or rooms, comprising the factory if the factory consists of, or includes, a portion of a building or portions of buildings.
( b ) *Permits issued prior to June 21, 2012.* A manufacturer of processed tobacco operating under a permit issued prior to June 21, 2012, must submit the information required under paragraph (a) of this section within 180 days after June 21, 2012.
( c ) *Extension or curtailment of factory.* If a manufacturer of processed tobacco wishes to change the premises delineated by its permit to an extent that would be inconsistent with the description or diagram of the premises that was submitted with the manufacturer's last permit application, the manufacturer must submit an application on TTB Form 5200.16 for, and obtain, an amended permit before the change in the premises occurs. The application must describe the proposed change in the premises and must be accompanied by a new diagram if required under paragraph (a) of this section.
[T.D. TTB-104, 77 FR 37303, June 21, 2012]
```

[Congressional Bills 116th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 565 Referred in Senate (RFS)]

<DOC>
116th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 565

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                            December 4, 2019

   Received; read twice an referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
 To include Portugal in the list of foreign states whose nationals are 
      eligible for admission into the United States as E1 and E2 
 nonimmigrants if United States nationals are treated similarly by the 
                        Government of Portugal.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Advancing Mutual Interests and 
Growing Our Success Act'' or the ``AMIGOS Act''.

SEC. 2. NONIMMIGRANT TRADERS AND INVESTORS.

    For purposes of clauses (i) and (ii) of section 101(a)(15)(E) of 
the Immigration and Nationality Act (8 U.S.C. 1101(a)(15)(E)), Portugal 
shall be considered to be a foreign state described in such section if 
the Government of Portugal provides similar nonimmigrant status to 
nationals of the United States.

SEC. 3. DETERMINATION OF BUDGETARY EFFECTS.

    The budgetary effects of this Act, for the purpose of complying 
with the Statutory Pay-As-You-Go Act of 2010, shall be determined by 
reference to the latest statement titled ``Budgetary Effects of PAYGO 
Legislation'' for this Act, submitted for printing in the Congressional 
Record by the Chairman of the House Budget Committee, provided that 
such statement has been submitted prior to the vote on passage.

            Passed the House of Representatives December 3, 2019.

            Attest:

                                             CHERYL L. JOHNSON,

                                                                 Clerk.
```
exhibit_4-7.htm











	
  

	
EXHIBIT 4.7







RR Media Ltd.


 


Amendment No. 5 to 2006 Israel Equity Incentive Plan


Adopted June 11, 2015







The RR Media Ltd. 2006 Israel Equity Incentive Plan (the “Plan”) is hereby amended as follows (the “Amendment”):








	 	
1. 

	
The first sentence of Section 3(a) of the Plan is deleted in its entirety and replaced with the following:


 



“Subject to the provisions of Section 18 of the Plan, the maximum aggregate number of Shares which may be issued under the Plan is 2,181,794 Shares.”









 



	 	
2. 

	
Except as explicitly amended by this Amendment, all other terms of the Plan shall remain in full force and effect.
#### Anup KAUR, Petitioner, v. Alberto R. GONZALES, Attorney General, Respondent.

No. 04-72026.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted Feb. 13, 2006.*

Decided Feb. 22, 2006.

*819George T. Heridis, Esq., Rai & Associates, PC, San Francisco, CA, for Petitioner.

Regional Counsel, Western Region Immigration & Naturalization Service, Laguna Niguel, CA, Regina Byrd, Attorney, U.S. Department of Justice Civil Div./Office of Immigration Lit., Washington, DC, for Respondent.

*

 The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. *See*Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

MEMORANDUM **

Anup Kaur, a native and citizen of India, petitions for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order denying her motion to reopen removal proceedings based on changed country conditions in India. To the extent we have jurisdiction, it is conferred by 8 U.S.C. § 1252(a)(1). We review for abuse of discretion the denial of a motion to reopen, *see De Martinez v. Ashcroft,*363 F.3d 1022, 1024 (9th Cir. 2004), and we deny in part and dismiss in part the petition for review.

The BIA did not abuse its discretion in denying Kaur’s motion to reopen because the newspaper articles she submitted were too general to demonstrate an objective basis for fearing persecution in India, and she offered no evidence to overcome the immigration judge’s (“IJ”) adverse credibility finding. Thus, Kaur failed to establish prima facie eligibility for asylum or withholding of removal. *See*8 C.F.R. § 1003.2(c)(1); *Konstantinova v. INS,*195 F.3d 528, 530 (9th Cir.1999) (upholding the denial of motion to reopen where petitioner introduced evidence that was too general in nature to demonstrate a well-founded fear of persecution).

The BIA did not abuse its discretion in declining to reissue its earlier decision because even if Kaur had reason to be confused about the exact date the decision issued, she filed her motion to reopen within the requisite 90 days, so no prejudice resulted.

Kaur’s contention that the BIA erred in failing to fully explain its reasons for denying her motion to reopen lacks merit because the BIA is entitled to the presumption that it considered all relevant evidence in reaching its conclusion, and Kaur failed to rebut that presumption. *See Larita-Martinez,*220 F.3d 1092, 1095-96 (9th Cir. 2000).

We lack jurisdiction to review Kaur’s challenge to the IJ’s adverse credibility finding, affirmed in the BIA’s order of November 10, 2003, because the instant petition for review is not timely as to that *820order. *See*8 U.S.C. § 1252(b); *Martinez-Serrano v. INS,*94 F.Sd 1256, 1258 (9th Cir.1996).

We also lack jurisdiction to consider Kaur’s contention regarding her eligibility for CAT relief, because she failed to exhaust that claim before the BIA. *See Barron v. Ashcroft,*358 F.3d 674, 676 (9th Cir.2004).

PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED in part; DISMISSED in part

**

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY

 15,986

 16,232

 16,104

 15,969

 15,846

 15,712

 15,930

 16,151

 16,039

 15,952

 15,846

 15,726

 15,597

 15,818

 16,045

 15,964

 15,812

 15,650

 15,503

 15,303

 15,428

 15,545

 15,341

 15,105

 14,644

 14,205

 13,698

 13,812

 14,063

 13,754

 13,597

 69,109

 68,177

 67,647

 67,075

 66,487

 65,913

 64,990

 64,036

 63,056

 62,959

 62,415

 61,848

 61,277

 60,343

 59,426

 58,826

 58,800

 57,699

 57,047

 56,441

 55,510

 54,545

 53,947

 53,373

 53,071

 52,746

 52,456

 51,550

 50,665

 50,228

 49,602

STORAGE - A.F. 

 85,095

 84,409

 83,751

 83,044

 82,333

 81,625

 80,920

 80,187

 79,095

 78,911

 78,261

 77,574

 76,874

 76,161

 75,471

 74,790

 74,612

 73,349

 72,550

 71,744

 70,938

 70,090

 69,288

 68,478

 67,715

 66,951

 66,154

 65,362

 64,728

 63,982

 63,199

619

844

896

679

919

823

643

710

787

1,197

901

620

756

636

734

380

242

772

946

833

918

704

850

1,002

941

1,308

989

1,164

1,663

850

768

270

498

564

323

561

466

288

340

236

1,104

573

274

403

277

386

37

152

135

543

427

512

276

446

594

556

923

587

765

1,343

474

373

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

OCTOBER 2000 FULL NATURAL FLOW AT NEW MELONES DAM RUN DATE: 11/29/2000

TOTALS -22,589 14,706

* October 1, 29,169

 0.5

 1.5

 2.6

 3.3

 4.4

 5.3

 5.9

 6.6

 7.0

 9.2

 10.4

 10.9

 11.7

 12.3

 13.0

 13.1

 13.4

 13.7

 14.7

 15.6

 16.6

 17.1

 18.0

 19.2

 20.3

 22.1

 23.3

 24.8

 27.5

 28.4

 29.2

DONNELLS

RES

BEARDSLEY

RES

2000 TO DATE

NEW

MELONES

INFLOW

C.F.S

NATURAL

RIVER

C.F.S

ACCUM *

FULL

NATURAL

1000 A.F.

RESERVOIR

TOTAL

-693

-686

-658

-707

-711

-708

-705

-733

-1,092

-184

-650

-687

-700

-713

-690

-681

-178

-1,263

-799

-806

-806

-848

-802

-810

-763

-764

-797

-792

-634

-746

-783

CHANGE

A.F. C.F.S.

-349

-346

-332

-356

-358

-357

-355

-370

-551

-93

-328

-346

-353

-359

-348

-343

-90

-637

-403

-406

-406

-428

-404

-408

-385

-385

-402

-399

-320

-376

-395
HILLS BANCORPORATION
                                   EXHIBIT II
                    COMPUTATION OF EARNINGS PER COMMON SHARE
<TABLE>

                                                 Three months ended        Six months ended
                                                       June 30                   June 30
                                                      -------                   -------
                                                   2001        2000       2001         2000
                                                   ----        ----       ----         ----
<S>                                             <C>         <C>        <C>          <C>
Weighted average number of shares
  outstanding (basic)                           1,496,044   1,495,941   1,495,764    1,495,941


Weighted average of potential dilutive shares
  attributable to stock options granted
  computed under the treasury stock method         12,689      12,677      12,182       12,631
                                                ---------   ---------   ---------    ---------
Weighted average number of shares (diluted)     1,508,733   1,508,618   1,507,946    1,508,572
                                                =========   =========   =========    =========


Earnings Per Share:

   Net income (in thousands)                       $2,534      $2,399     $4,841       $4,603
                                                   ======      ======     ======       ======

   Earnings per common share:
     Basic                                         $ 1.69      $ 1.60      $3.23       $ 3.08
                                                     ====        ====       ====         ====
     Diluted                                         1.68        1.59       3.21         3.05
                                                     ====        ====       ====         ====

 </table>
#### § 10.726 When does a juror's entitlement to disability compensation begin?

Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1877, entitlement to disability compensation does not commence until the day after the date of termination of service as a juror.
### Part D—Capacity for Nursing Students and Faculty