alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### § 1002.100 Does the five-year service limit include all absences from an employment position that are related to service in the uniformed services?

No. The five-year period includes only the time the employee spends actually performing service in the uniformed services. A period of absence from employment before or after performing service in the uniformed services does not count against the five-year limit. For example, after the employee completes a period of service in the uniformed services, he or she is provided a certain amount of time, depending upon the length of service, to report back to work or submit an application for reemployment. The period between completing the uniformed service and reporting back to work or seeking reemployment does not count against the five-year limit.
§ 10.816 What will cause OWCP to automatically exclude a physician or other provider of medical services and supplies? ( a ) OWCP shall automatically exclude a physician, hospital, or provider of medical services or supplies who has been convicted of a crime described in § 10.815(a), or has been excluded or suspended, or has resigned in lieu of exclusion or suspension, from participation in any program as described in § 10.815(b).
( b ) The exclusion applies to participating in the program and to seeking payment under the FECA for services performed after the date of the entry of the judgment of conviction or order of exclusion, suspension or resignation, as the case may be, by the court or agency concerned. Proof of the conviction, exclusion, suspension or resignation may consist of a copy thereof authenticated by the seal of the court or agency concerned.
( c ) A provider may be excluded on a voluntary basis at any time.
§ 9.28 Santa Maria Valley. ( a ) *Name.* The name of the viticultural area described in this section is “Santa Maria Valley”. For purposes of part 4 of this chapter, “Santa Maria Valley” is a term of viticultural significance.
( b ) *Approved maps.* The six United States Geological Survey maps used to determine the boundary of the Santa Maria Valley viticultural area are titled: ( 1 ) Orcutt Quadrangle, California-Santa Barbara Co., 7.5 minute series, 1959, photorevised 1967 and 1974, photoinspected 1978;
( 2 ) Santa Maria Quadrangle, California, 7.5 minute series, 1959, photorevised 1982;
( 3 ) “San Luis Obispo”, N.I. 10-3, series V 502, scale 1: 250,000;
( 4 ) “Santa Maria”, N.I. 10-6, 9, series V 502, scale 1: 250,000;
( 5 ) Foxen Canyon Quadrangle, California-Santa Barbara Co., 7.5-minute series, 1995; and
( 6 ) Sisquoc Quadrangle, California-Santa Barbara Co., 7.5 minute series, 1959, photoinspected 1974.
( c ) *Boundary.* The Santa Maria Valley viticultural area is located in Santa Barbara and San Luis Obispo Counties, California. The boundary of the Santa Maria Valley viticultural area is as follows: ( 1 ) Begin on the Orcutt quadrangle map at the intersection of U.S. Route 101 and Clark Avenue, section 18 north boundary line, T9N/R33W, then proceed generally north along U.S. Route 101 approximately 10 miles onto the Santa Maria quadrangle map to U.S. Route 101's intersection with State Route 166 (east), T10N/R34W; then
( 2 ) Proceed generally northeast along State Route 166 (east) onto the San Luis Obispo N.I. 10-3 map to State Route 166's intersection with the section line southwest of Chimney Canyon, T11N/R32W; then
( 3 ) Proceed south in a straight line onto the Santa Maria N.I. 10-6 map to the 3,016-foot summit of Los Coches Mountain; then
( 4 ) Proceed southeast in a straight line onto the Foxen Canyon quadrangle map to the 2,822-foot summit of Bone Mountain, T9N/R32W; then
( 5 ) Proceed south-southwest in a straight line approximately 6 miles to the line's intersection with secondary highways Foxen Canyon Road and Alisos Canyon Road and a marked 1,116-foot elevation point, T8N/R32W; then
( 6 ) Proceed west-northwest in a straight line approximately 6 miles onto the Sisquoc quadrangle map to the southeast corner of section 4, T8N/R32W; then
( 7 ) Proceed west-northwest in a straight line approximately 6.2 miles, crossing over the Solomon Hills, to the line's intersection with U.S. Route 101 and a private, unnamed light-duty road that meanders east into the Cat Canyon Oil Field, T9N/R33W; then
( 8 ) Proceed north 3.75 miles along U.S. Route 101 onto the Orcutt quadrangle map and return to the point of beginning.
[T.D. ATF-89, 46 FR 39812, Aug. 5, 1981, as amended by T.D. TTB-88, 75 FR 81849, Dec. 29, 2010]
§ 1002.55 Is all funeral honors duty considered “service in the uniformed services?” ( a ) USERRA's definition of “service in the uniformed services” includes a period for which an employee is absent from employment for the purpose of performing authorized funeral honors duty under 10 U.S.C. 12503 (members of Reserve ordered to perform funeral honors duty) or 32 U.S.C. 115 (Member of Air or Army National Guard ordered to perform funeral honors duty).
( b ) Funeral honors duty performed by persons who are not members of the uniformed services, such as members of veterans' service organizations, is not “service in the uniformed services.”
Order entered February 2 8 , 2013

In The 

## Court of Appeals **Fifth District of Texas at Dallas** No. 05 - 11 - 01659 - CR No. 05 - 11 - 01660 - CR No. 05 - 11 - 01661 - CR No. 05 - 11 - 01662 - CR RONALD WAYNE LIGHTNER , Appellant V. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee On Appeal from t he 195th Judicial District Court Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No s . F10 - 11165 - N , F10 - 11166 - N, F10 - 59447 - N, and F10 - 25163 - N 

### O RDER
We ORDER the District Clerk to file with this Court the clerk’s record, including the indictment and all other docum ents in trial court cause no. F10

- 59447

- N (appellate cause no. 05

- 11

- 01662

- CR) by March 14, 2013. The clerk’s record previously filed in trial court cause no. F10

- 59447

- N mistakenly contained the documents for trial court no. F10

- 11166

- N. In a ppellate cau se nos. 05

- 11

- 01659

- CR, 05

- 11

- 01660

- CR, 05

- 11

- 01661

- CR, and 05

- 11

- 01662

- CR, the Master Index of the Reporter’s Record was filed three times and Volume 5 was filed twice. Volumes 3 and 4 of the Reporter’s Record have not been filed. We ORDER the Court Repo rter, Sandra Hughes, to file Volumes 3 and 4 with this Court by March 14, 2013.We DIRECT the Clerk to send copies of this order by electronic transmission to Gary Fitzsimmons, Dallas County District Clerk; Dallas County District Clerk, Criminal Records Division; court reporter Sandra Hughes; and to counsel for all parties. /s/ MARY MURPHY PRESIDING JUSTICE
#### § 1002.151 If the employer provides full or partial pay to the employee while he or she is on military leave, is the employer required to also provide the non-seniority rights and benefits ordinarily granted to similarly situated employees on furlough or leave of absence?

Yes. If the employer provides additional benefits such as full or partial pay when the employee performs service, the employer is not excused from providing other rights and benefits to which the employee is entitled under the Act.
MEMORANDUM 

DATE: December 1, 2014 

TO: Clean Power Plan for Existing Power Plants; Docket ID: OAR–2013-0602 

FROM: Melanie King, Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards 

SUBJECT: November 18, 2014 Meeting and Tribal Consultation with Fort McDowell Yavapai 

Nation Regarding Proposed Clean Power Plan for Existing Power Plants 

SUMMARY 

A meeting was held between EPA and the attendee(s) listed below on November 18, 2014, to 

discuss the proposed Clean Power Plan Supplemental Proposal for Existing Power Plants in Indian 

Country and U.S. Territories. The Clean Power Plan Supplemental Proposal was issued on October 28, 

2014, and published in the Federal Register on November 4, 2014. 

ATTENDEES 

Fort McDowell Yavapai Nation 

 Carole Klopatek 

EPA 

 William Niebling, OAR 

 Greg Green, OAR/OAQPS 

 Laura McKelvey, OAR/OAQPS 

 Melanie King, OAR/OAQPS 

 Mary Johnson, OAR/OAQPS (by phone) 

 Amy Zimpfer, Region 9 

 Anita Lee, Region 9 

 Colleen McKaughan, Region 9 

 Laura Farris, Region 8
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY ELEV

 222.78

 221.97

 221.99

 220.64

 223.02

 223.61

 222.72

 222.08

 221.95

 222.57

 220.51

 220.39

 221.63

 221.34

 221.33

 222.08

 221.65

 219.24

 220.36

 221.13

 222.42

 223.64

 223.14

 222.60

 221.62

 221.94

 223.12

 223.04

 222.79

 223.04

 222.96

 50,459

 48,308

 48,360

 44,818

 51,100

 52,679

 50,299

 48,597

 48,255

 49,900

 44,479

 44,166

 47,414

 46,653

 46,626

 48,597

 47,467

 41,196

 44,088

 46,101

 49,501

 52,759

 51,420

 49,980

 47,388

 48,229

 51,367

 51,153

 50,486

 51,153

 50,939

STORAGE

-2,542

-2,151

+52

-3,542

+6,282

+1,579

-2,380

-1,702

-342

+1,645

-5,421

-313

+3,248

-761

-27

+1,971

-1,130

-6,271

+2,892

+2,013

+3,400

+3,258

-1,339

-1,440

-2,592

+841

+3,138

-214

-667

+667

-214

CHANGE

450

414

575

781

759

687

671

635

689

799

911

791

594

558

510

665

855

940

1,185

1,294

1,277

1,285

1,368

1,560

1,728

1,784

1,651

1,795

1,906

1,898

1,983

PUMPING

 7,769

 7,741

 8,011

 8,538

 7,522

 7,431

 7,800

 7,496

 7,867

 7,785

 7,892

 7,113

 7,077

 7,606

 8,286

 7,720

 8,236

 9,239

 6,968

 6,710

 6,342

 6,028

 5,781

 6,336

 6,280

 5,609

 4,866

 5,639

 5,172

 5,176

 5,782

PUMPING

 1,173

 756

 1,312

 1,125

 0

 923

 0

 923

 102

 907

 2,426

 800

 597

 0

 0

 0

 622

 1,225

 403

 819

 723

 430

 3,587

 2,473

 3,703

 2,178

 820

 923

 1,640

 1,332

 2,460

PUMPING

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

GEN.

*

+256

+81

+346

+683

+786

+497

+299

+488

+151

+265

+372

+384

+212

+194

-481

+359

+193

+250

+266

+650

+260

+300

+350

-1

+56

-266

-287

-214

+304

-293

+243

OR

UNITED STATES 

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION

CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT

CONSOLIDATED STATE-FEDERAL O'NEILL FOREBAY September 23, 2002

DAILY OPERATIONS

AUGUST 2002 RUN DATE:

IN LAKE GEN.

ACRE-FEET O'NEILL

RELEASE - C.F.S. 

TOTALS -2,062 32,998 0 34,382 217,818 +6,703

ACRE-FEET -2,062 65,452 0 68,197 432,042

SUMMARY

 0

RELEASE (ACRE-FEET)

O'NEILL GEN. 0

SAN LUIS PUMP 68,197 0

 53,001

DOS AMIGOS PUMP 432,042

DELIVERIES 

S. LUIS O'NEILL

 0

 1,096

 2,044

 0

 3,049

 2,358

 0

 0

 1,012

 2,024

 0

 272

 2,769

 1,080

 2,493

 1,744

 1,008

 0

 1,014

 1,010

 1,003

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 23,976

 47,556

CALIF. DOS AMIGOS

AQUEDUCT

6,954

5,822

6,383

6,413

6,095

5,607

5,630

6,438

5,945

6,434

6,302

6,309

5,737

5,390

5,752

5,946

6,232

6,113

6,364

5,591

6,240

6,516

6,975

6,524

6,891

6,694

5,904

4,872

4,265

5,241

5,907

 187,486

 371,878

S. LUIS

DELIV.

GAINS(+)

LOSS(-)

C.F.S.

INFLOW - C.F.S

STATE OF CALIFORNIA

THE RESOURCES AGENCY

DEPARTMENT OF WATER RESOURCES

STATE WATER PROJECT

TOTAL 500,239

 13,295

* DAILY DEL. FIGURES UNAVAILABLE. TOT. DEL. IS INCLUDED IN COMPUTING MONTHLY TOTALS 

Table 18
### SUBCHAPTER I—EDUCATION SCIENCES REFORM
### §9151. State advisory councils

Each State desiring assistance under this subchapter may establish a State advisory council which is broadly representative of the library entities in the State, including public, tribal, school, academic, special, and institutional libraries, and libraries serving people of diverse geographic, cultural, and socioeconomic backgrounds, individuals with disabilities, residents of rural and urban areas, Native Americans, military families, veterans, and caregivers.

(Pub. L. 94–462, title II, §251, as added Pub. L. 104–208, div. A, title I, §101(e) [title VII, §702], Sept. 30, 1996, 110 Stat. 3009–233, 3009–301; amended Pub. L. 115–410, §13, Dec. 31, 2018, 132 Stat. 5417.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

2018—Pub. L. 115–410 inserted "tribal," after "public," and substituted "and libraries serving people of diverse geographic, cultural, and socioeconomic backgrounds, individuals with disabilities, residents of rural and urban areas, Native Americans, military families, veterans, and caregivers" for "and libraries serving individuals with disabilities".
§ 99.22 What minimum requirements exist for the conduct of a hearing? The hearing required by § 99.21 must meet, at a minimum, the following requirements: ( a ) The educational agency or institution shall hold the hearing within a reasonable time after it has received the request for the hearing from the parent or eligible student.
( b ) The educational agency or institution shall give the parent or eligible student notice of the date, time, and place, reasonably in advance of the hearing.
( c ) The hearing may be conducted by any individual, including an official of the educational agency or institution, who does not have a direct interest in the outcome of the hearing.
( d ) The educational agency or institution shall give the parent or eligible student a full and fair opportunity to present evidence relevant to the issues raised under § 99.21. The parent or eligible student may, at their own expense, be assisted or represented by one or more individuals of his or her own choice, including an attorney.
( e ) The educational agency or institution shall make its decision in writing within a reasonable period of time after the hearing.
( f ) The decision must be based solely on the evidence presented at the hearing, and must include a summary of the evidence and the reasons for the decision.
(Authority: 20 U.S.C. 1232g(a)(2))
§ 209.5 Information regarding change in status. It is the duty of each employer to promptly notify the Board of: ( a ) Any change in the employer's operations, ownership or control of the employer which affects its status as an employer under the Railroad Retirement Act and the Railroad Unemployment Insurance Act;
( b ) Any change in the ownership or control by the employer in any company which may affect the status of the company as an employer under the Railroad Retirement Act or Railroad Unemployment Insurance Act; and
( c ) The gain of ownership or control by the employer of any company which may give that company status as an employer under the Railroad Retirement Act and Railroad Unemployment Insurance Act. The notice must fully advise the Board of the type of change in ownership, the date of the change, the number of employees affected by the change and any other information pertinent to the change.
[49 FR 46729, Nov. 28, 1984. Redesignated at 63 FR 32613, June 15, 1998]
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

November 29, 2021

No. 04-20-00304-CV

1776 ENERGY PARTNERS, LLC and 1776 Energy Operators, LLC,

Appellants

v.

MARATHON OIL EF, LLC and Marathon Oil EF II, LLC,

Appellees

From the 218th Judicial District Court, Karnes County, Texas

Trial Court No. 17-02-00033-CVK

Honorable Russell Wilson, Judge Presiding

ORDER

The Appellant's Motion for Extension of Time to file Brief is hereby GRANTED. 

Appellant's Brief is due December 6, 2021.

_________________________________

Rebeca C. Martinez, Chief Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said 

court on this 29th day of November, 2021.

___________________________________

MICHAEL A. CRUZ, Clerk of Court
###### Editorial Note on Part 44

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 44 appear by T.D. ATF-464, 66 FR 43480, Aug. 20, 2001, and T.D. ATF-480, 67 FR 30801-30803, May 8, 2002.

#### § 44.196a To a foreign-trade zone.

Where tobacco products, and cigarette papers and tubes are removed from a factory or an export warehouse for delivery to a foreign-trade zone, under zone restricted status for the purpose of exportation or storage, the manufacturer or export warehouse proprietor shall consign the shipment to the Zone Operator in care of the customs officer in charge of the zone.

(48 Stat. 999, as amended, 72 Stat. 1418, as amended; 19 U.S.C. 81c, 26 U.S.C. 5704)

[T.D. 6871, 31 FR 53, Jan. 4, 1966. Redesignated at 40 FR 16835, Apr. 15, 1975, and amended by T.D. ATF-232, 51 FR 28089, Aug. 5, 1986; T.D. ATF-243, 51 FR 43194, Dec. 1, 1986]
## I N T H E C O U R T O F C R I M I N A L A P P E A L S O F T E X A S NO. WR-84,809-01

EX P ARTE CYNTHIA ANN HUDSON, Applicant
ON AP P LICATION FOR A WRIT OF HABEAS CORP US CAUSE NO. 2009F 00005 IN THE 5T H DISTRICT COURT

F ROM CASS COUNTY
Per curiam . O R D E R Pursuant to the provisi o n s o f Ar t icle 11.07 of the Texas Code of Criminal Procedur e, the cler k of the trial court transmitted to this Court this application for a writ of habea s corpus. Ex parte Y oung , 418 S.W .2d 824, 826 (Tex. Crim. App. 1967). Applicant wa s convicted of capital murder and sentenc ed to life imprisonment. The Six th Court of Appea ls a ffirme d her conviction. Hudson

v. State , No. 415 S.W .3d 891, 897 (Tex. App.—Texarkana 2013), aff’d, 449 S.W .3d 495 (Tex. Crim. App. 2014). Applicant contends that trial counsel rende red ineffe ctive assistance
. On Februar y 8, 2017,
we denied this application, based on the trial court’s finding s, wi t h o ut a h earing
. Subsequently , Applicant filed a reque st to rec onsider, on our own motion, our ruling and aler ting the Court that a2

habea s hearing was conducte d by the trial court on September 1, 2016. There fore , we rec onsider the orig inal dispositi on, and deny this application, based on the trial court’s finding s, afte r a hearing. All other sug g estions for rec onsideration on t h e C o u rt’s own initiative in Applicant’s motion are denied.

Filed: Mar ch 1, 2017 Do not publish
1

Cervak, Sarah

From: Hodanbosi, Bob [Bob.Hodanbosi@epa.state.oh.us]

Sent: Friday, September 20, 2013 2:12 PM

To: Mooney, John; Aburano, Douglas; Arra, Sarah

Cc: Braun, Paul

Subject: Typo in Ohio EPA Rule 18-04

John and Co., 

I am writing to you to confirm that the version of OAC rule 3745-18-04 under review at US EPA Region V contains a 

typo. The coal sampling provisions should refer to US EPA Method 19, not Method 9. Ohio EPA will clean up the rule 

during the next time that the sulfur dioxide rules are modified. Please let me know if you need any additional 

information. 

Thank you. 

Bob Hodanbosi
19–008 

112TH CONGRESS REPORT " ! HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 2d Session 112–415 

PROVIDING FOR CONSIDERATION OF THE BILL (H.R. 2087) TO REMOVE 

RESTRICTIONS FROM A PARCEL OF LAND SITUATED IN THE ATLANTIC 

DISTRICT, ACCOMACK COUNTY, VIRGINIA 

MARCH 19, 2012.—Referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be printed 

Mr. BISHOP of Utah, from the Committee on Rules, 

submitted the following 

R E P O R T 

[To accompany H. Res. 587] 

The Committee on Rules, having had under consideration House 

Resolution 587, by a nonrecord vote, report the same to the House 

with the recommendation that the resolution be adopted. 

SUMMARY OF PROVISIONS OF THE RESOLUTION

The resolution provides for consideration of H.R. 2087, to remove 

restrictions from a parcel of land situated in the Atlantic District, 

Accomack County, Virginia, under a modified open rule. The resolution provides one hour of general debate equally divided and 

controlled by the chair and ranking minority member of the Committee on Natural Resources. The resolution waives all points of 

order against consideration of the bill. The resolution makes in 

order the amendment in the nature of a substitute recommended 

by the Committee on Natural Resources now printed in the bill 

as original text for purpose of amendment and provides that it 

shall be considered as read. The resolution waives all points of 

order against the amendment in the nature of a substitute. The 

resolution makes in order only those amendments that are submitted for printing in the Congressional Record dated March 19, 

2012, or pro forma amendments for the purpose of debate. Each 

amendment submitted for printing in the Congressional Record 

may be offered only by the member who submitted it for printing 

or the Member’s designee and shall be considered as read if printed. Finally, the resolution provides one motion to recommit with or 

without instructions. 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with REPORTS
2 

EXPLANATION OF WAIVERS

Although the resolution waives all points of order against consideration of the bill, the Committee is not aware of any points of 

order. The waiver is prophylactic in nature. 

Although the resolution waives all points of order against the 

committee amendment in the nature of a substitute made in order 

as original text, the Committee is not aware of any points of order. 

The waiver is prophylactic in nature. 

Æ 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with REPORTS
Editorial Note on Part 70
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 70 appear by T.D. ATF-450, 66 FR 29022-29030, May 29, 2001.

§ 70.113 Penalty for failure to supply taxpayer identification number. ( a ) *In general.* Except as provided in paragraph (b) of this section, any person who is required by the regulations under section 6109 of the Internal Revenue Code to include the taxpayer identification number in any return, statement, or other document, fails to comply with such requirement at the time prescribed by such regulations, such person shall pay a penalty of $50 for each such failure, except that the total amount imposed on such person for all such failures during any calendar year shall not exceed $100,000. For returns having a due date (determined without regard to extensions) after December 31, 1986, the total amount imposed on such person for all such failures during any calendar year shall not exceed $100,000. Such penalty shall be paid in the same manner as tax upon the issuance of a notice and demand therefor.
( b ) *Reasonable cause.* If any person who is required by the regulations under section 6109 of the Internal Revenue Code to supply a taxpayer identification number fails to comply with such requirement at the time prescribed by such regulations, but establishes to the satisfaction of the appropriate TTB officer that such failure was due to reasonable cause, the penalty set forth in paragraph (a) of this section shall not apply.
( c ) *Persons required to supply taxpayer identification numbers.* For regulations under section 6109 of the Internal Revenue Code relating to persons required to supply an identifying number, see the regulations relating to the particular tax.
(26 U.S.C. 6723)
[T.D. ATF-251, 52 FR 19314, May 22, 1987. Redesignated and amended by T.D. ATF-301, 55 FR 47606, 47615, Nov. 14, 1990]