alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 1002.193 Does the reemployment position include elements such as seniority, status, and rate of pay? ( a ) Yes. The reemployment position includes the seniority, status, and rate of pay that an employee would ordinarily have attained in that position given his or her job history, including prospects for future earnings and advancement. The employer must determine the seniority rights, status, and rate of pay as though the employee had been continuously employed during the period of service. The seniority rights, status, and pay of an employment position include those established (or changed) by a collective bargaining agreement, employer policy, or employment practice. The sources of seniority rights, status, and pay include agreements, policies, and practices in effect at the beginning of the employee's service, and any changes that may have occurred during the period of service. In particular, the employee's status in the reemployment position could include opportunities for advancement, general working conditions, job location, shift assignment, rank, responsibility, and geographical location.
( b ) If an opportunity for promotion, or eligibility for promotion, that the employee missed during service is based on a skills test or examination, then the employer should give him or her a reasonable amount of time to adjust to the employment position and then give a skills test or examination. No fixed amount of time for permitting adjustment to reemployment will be deemed reasonable in all cases. However, in determining a reasonable amount of time to permit an employee to adjust to reemployment before scheduling a makeup test or examination, an employer may take into account a variety of factors, including but not limited to the length of time the returning employee was absent from work, the level of difficulty of the test itself, the typical time necessary to prepare or study for the test, the duties and responsibilities of the reemployment position and the promotional position, and the nature and responsibilities of the service member while serving in the uniformed service. If the employee is successful on the makeup exam and, based on the results of that exam, there is a reasonable certainty that he or she would have been promoted, or made eligible for promotion, during the time that the employee served in the uniformed service, then the promotion or eligibility for promotion must be made effective as of the date it would have occurred had employment not been interrupted by uniformed service.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
COMPANY'S FINANCIAL STATEMENTS FOR THE SIX MONTHS ENDED JUNE 30, 2000 AND IS
QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             APR-03-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               JUL-02-2000
<CASH>                                          36,826
<SECURITIES>                                    21,222
<RECEIVABLES>                                    3,576
<ALLOWANCES>                                       100
<INVENTORY>                                      6,232
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                68,429
<PP&E>                                           7,859
<DEPRECIATION>                                   1,767
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  74,793
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           11,303
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            26
<OTHER-SE>                                      62,075
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    74,793
<SALES>                                          7,872
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 7,872
<CGS>                                            3,385
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    3,385
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 4,666
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  67
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    168
<INCOME-TAX>                                        50
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                118
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       118
<EPS-BASIC>                                      .01
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .00


</TABLE>
##### 



CARDIAC SCIENCE CORPORATION
STOCK OPTION GRANT NOTICE
2002 STOCK INCENTIVE PLAN
 www.wealthviews.com/CSC
 Participant:Grant Date:Vesting Commencement Date:Number of Shares Subject to Option:Exercise Price (per Share):Option Expiration Date:
    
    (subject to earlier
termination in accordance with
the terms of the Plan and the
Stock Option Agreement)__________Type of Option:
    
    Nonqualified Stock OptionVesting and Exercisability Schedule:
    
    1/4th of the
shares subject to the Option
will vest and become exercisable
one year after the Vesting
Commencement Date.1/36th of the
remaining shares subject to the
Option will vest and become
exercisable monthly thereafter
over the next three years.
 Additional Terms/Acknowledgement www.wealthviews.com/CSC
 Cardiac Science Corporation
    
    
    
    PARTICIPANTBy:
    
    
    
    

    
    SignatureIts:Date:Attachments:
    
    
    
    Address:1. Stock Option Agreement2. 2002 Stock Incentive Plan
    
    
    
    Taxpayer ID:3. Plan Summary




---



##### 



CARDIAC SCIENCE CORPORATION
2002 STOCK INCENTIVE PLAN
STOCK OPTION AGREEMENT
 
  Vesting and Exercisability
 Securities Law Compliance
 Method of Exercise
 Treatment Upon Termination of Service Relationship
 General Rule
 Death




---



##### 



Company Transaction
 It is your responsibility to be aware of the date the Option terminates.
 Limited Transferability
 Withholding Taxes
 Option Not an Employment or Service Contract
 No Right to Damages
 Binding Effect




---



##### 



[ Include Sections 10 and 11 for non-U.S. resident option grants only: Limitation on
Rights; No Right to Future Grants; Extraordinary Item of Compensation
 Employee Data Privacy
### SUBCHAPTER IV—NATIONAL PROGRAMS
I 

114TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 3703 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to extend qualified zone 

academy bonds for 2 years and to reduce the private business contribution requirement with respect to such bonds. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

OCTOBER 7, 2015 

Mr. KIND (for himself and Mr. KELLY of Pennsylvania) introduced the 

following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Ways and Means 

A BILL 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to extend 

qualified zone academy bonds for 2 years and to reduce 

the private business contribution requirement with respect to such bonds. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Investing in 21st Cen5 tury Schools Act’’. 


SSpencer on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 3703 IH

1 SEC. 2. EXTENSION AND MODIFICATION OF QUALIFIED 

2 ZONE ACADEMY BONDS. 

3 (a) EXTENSION.—Section 54E(c)(1) of the Internal 

4 Revenue Code of 1986 is amended by striking ‘‘and 2014’’ 

5 and inserting ‘‘2014, 2015, and 2016’’. 

6 (b) REDUCTION OF PRIVATE BUSINESS CONTRIBU7 TION REQUIREMENT.—Section 54E(b) of such Code is 

8 amended by striking ‘‘10 percent’’ and inserting ‘‘5 per9 cent’’. 

10 (c) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendments made by 

11 this section shall apply to obligations issued after the date 

12 of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


SSpencer on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
###### Editorial Note on [Part 40](/current/title-27/part-40?toc=1)

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 40 appear by T.D. ATF-460, [66 FR 39094-39096](https://www.federalregister.gov/citation/66-FR-39094), July 27, 2001; T.D. ATF-464, [66 FR 43479](https://www.federalregister.gov/citation/66-FR-43479), Aug. 20, 2001; and T.D. TTB-91, [76 FR 5479](https://www.federalregister.gov/citation/76-FR-5479), Feb. 1, 2011.

#### § 40.25 Smokeless tobacco tax rates.

Smokeless tobacco products are taxed at the following rates under [26 U.S.C. 5701(e)](https://www.govinfo.gov/link/uscode/26/5701):

| Product | Tax rate per pound\* for removals during the following periods: | |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 2002 to March 31, 2009 | April 1, 2009 and after |
| Snuff | $ 0.585 | $ 1.51 |
| Chewing tobacco | $ 0.195 | $ 0.5033 |
| | | |
| --- | --- | --- |
| \* Prorate tax for fractions of a pound. | | |

[T.D. TTB-75, [74 FR 14482](https://www.federalregister.gov/citation/74-FR-14482), Mar. 31, 2009]
|  |  | [if !vml]>[endif]>

You have  reached the Federal Depository Library Program Electronic Collection  (FDLP/EC) Archive. This archive assures ongoing access to publications in the  FDLP/EC. Access to publications in the archive is available through GPO's  suite of cataloging and locator services, including the Catalog of U.S.  Government Publications (CGP).
Title:    Motor vehicle use map. Deschutes National Forest, Oregon

 
SuDocs Number:A 13.28:D 45/7/
Item    Number:[if !vml]>[endif]>0080-G (online)

GPO      System Number: 000867536

 
2011
 
2012 (Map 7 Missing)
 
2013
 
2016
 
2019 (2 maps only: Updates to Maps 2 & 3)
 
 
 
 
 
A service of the Superintendent of Documents,  U.S. Government Printing Office..

 

Last updated: May 14, 2020  Page Name:  http://permanent.access.gpo.gov/
perm |
|--|--|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
#### Emily S. Jackson, Appellant, v. Raleigh Associates, Inc., et al., Respondents.

We think that the applicability of the defenses set up in the amended replies should await the trial. Order denying plaintiff’s motion for leave to serve amended replies to the answers of the defendants unanimously reversed, with $10 costs and disbursements to the appellant, and the motion granted. Settle order on notice. Present — Peck, P. J., Glennon, Dore, Van Voorhis and Shientag, JJ. [See 274 App. Div. 821.]
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY ELEV

 123.19

 123.25

 124.45

 123.07

 122.89

 122.33

 122.11

 122.05

 121.95

 122.85

 123.02

 123.12

 122.38

 122.02

 122.31

 124.01

 124.14

 124.18

 123.72

 123.14

 122.57

 122.42

 123.38

 123.48

 122.80

 122.70

 122.80

 122.72

 123.05

 122.61

 122.49

 7,880

 7,909

 8,486

 7,824

 7,742

 7,490

 7,391

 7,364

 7,320

 7,724

 7,800

 7,847

 7,512

 7,350

 7,481

 8,266

 8,331

 8,351

 8,129

 7,857

 7,598

 7,530

 7,970

 8,017

 7,701

 7,656

 7,701

 7,665

 7,815

 7,616

 7,562

STORAGE

-278

+29

+577

-662

-82

-252

-99

-27

-44

+404

+76

+47

-335

-162

+131

+785

+65

+20

-222

-272

-259

-68

+440

+47

-316

-45

+45

-36

+150

-199

-54

CHANGE

815

944

1,212

616

912

821

899

936

926

1,136

949

964

764

841

999

1,331

961

940

816

786

797

896

1,147

954

776

905

956

910

1,001

826

910

INFLOW

 880

 854

 846

 875

 878

 873

 873

 877

 878

 862

 841

 870

 863

 853

 863

 865

 858

 860

 858

 853

 858

 860

 855

 860

 864

 857

 862

 857

 855

 855

 866

POWER

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

SPILL

 75

 75

 75

 75

 75

 75

 75

 72

 70

 70

 70

 70

 70

 70

 70

 70

 70

 70

 70

 70

 70

 70

 70

 70

 70

 70

 70

 70

 70

 70

 70

HATCHERY

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 1

 1

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 1

 1

 1

 1

 0

 1

 1

C.F.S.

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

DECEMBER 2014 LAKE NATOMA DAILY OPERATIONS RUN DATE: February 19, 2015

IN LAKE

EVAP

C.F.S.

COMPUTED*

ACRE-FEET

RELEASE - C.F.S.

TOTALS -596 28,646 26,729 0 2,207 8

ACRE-FEET -596 56,819 53,017 0 4,378 16

COMMENTS:

* COMPUTED INFLOW IS THE SUM OF CHANGE IN STORAGE, RELEASES AND EVAPORATION.

SUMMARY

RELEASES (ACRE-FEET)

POWER 53,017

SPILL 0

FOLSOM SOUTH CANAL

HATCHERY

 0

 4,378

 8,158

FOLSOM

SOUTH 

CANAL

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

(1)

(1) INCHES OF EVAPORATION TAKEN FROM FOLSOM PAN.

RELEASES (ACRE-FEET)

TOTAL 57,395
IIB 

116TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 5307 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

OCTOBER 1, 2020 

Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Homeland Security and 

Governmental Affairs 

AN ACT 

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service 

located at 115 Nicol Avenue in Thomasville, Alabama, 

as the ‘‘Postmaster Robert Ingram Post Office’’. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with BILLS
2 

HR 5307 RFS

1 SECTION 1. POSTMASTER ROBERT INGRAM POST OFFICE. 

2 (a) DESIGNATION.—The facility of the United States 

3 Postal Service located at 115 Nicol Avenue in Thomasville, 

4 Alabama, shall be known and designated as the ‘‘Post5 master Robert Ingram Post Office’’. 

6 (b) REFERENCES.—Any reference in a law, map, reg7 ulation, document, paper, or other record of the United 

8 States to the facility referred to in subsection (a) shall 

9 be deemed to be a reference to the ‘‘Postmaster Robert 

10 Ingram Post Office’’. 

Passed the House of Representatives September 30, 

2020. 

Attest: CHERYL L. JOHNSON, 

Clerk. 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with BILLS
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
STATEMENTS OF INCOME AND RETAINED EARNINGS FOR THE NINE MONTHS ENDED SEPTEMBER
30, 1998 AND 1997 AND FROM THE BALANCE SHEETS AT SEPTEMBER 30, 1998 AND DECEMBER
31, 1997 OF PACCAR FINANCIAL CORP. AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE
TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<RESTATED>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1998
<CASH>                                          10,086
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                2,786,321
<ALLOWANCES>                                    48,820
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                          58,075
<DEPRECIATION>                                  18,511
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               2,822,638
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0
<BONDS>                                        899,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                     31,000
<COMMON>                                        14,500
<OTHER-SE>                                     361,050
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 2,822,638
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               193,445
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  110,380
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                 8,124
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 41,365
<INCOME-TAX>                                    16,204
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             25,161
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    25,161
<EPS-BASIC>                                          0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0


</TABLE>
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

__________________________________________

)

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA )

)

v. ) Criminal Action No. 99-0043 (PLF)

)

 JOSE MARQUEZ, )

)

Defendant. )

__________________________________________)

ORDER

This matter is before the Court on defendant Jose Marquez’s claim that he

received ineffective assistance of counsel at trial. The court of appeals remanded the ineffective

assistance of counsel issue to this Court in order for this Court to develop a “more complete

record.” See United States v. Marquez, No. 05-2112 at 2 (D.C. Cir. May 2, 2006). The Court

has done so and, for the reasons explained in the Opinion issued this same day, has concluded

that Mr. Marquez’s trial counsel was constitutionally ineffective and that Mr. Marquez is entitled

to a new trial. The remand order instructed this Court to notify the court of appeals promptly

upon the conclusion of the proceedings on remand and directed the parties to file motions in the

court of appeals to govern future proceedings within thirty days. See id. at 3. Accordingly, it is

hereby 

ORDERED that the Clerk of this Court is directed promptly to notify the Clerk of

the court of appeals of this Order and accompanying Opinion and to provide a copy to him. 

/s/________________________

PAUL L. FRIEDMAN

DATE: August 28, 2009 United States District Judge
August 26, 2015

Dear Mr. Paul M. Hem, Jr:

This letter is to inform y ou that the following informati on is missing from your petition (Docket No. FAA-2015-1168). This informati on is necessary for the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) to process your petition.

 Describe the aircraft make(s), model(s) , and type(s) (i.e., fixed-wing, rotorcraft, lighter-than-air) for the proposed UAS operati on. The description(s) should include the maximum weight (including pa yload). This information can be located in the aircraft manual(s).

Please submit the additional information (non-proprietary) to your docket at www.regulations.gov and submit any proprietary information to the FAA Headquarters or electronically via email to 333exemptions@faa.gov. If you want us to process your request any further, we must receive the information desc ribed above by 9/9/15. If we do not receive the information, we will close the doc ket without notifying you further.

If you have any questions, please feel free to contact me at (202) 267-4712.

Sincerely,

/s/
Brenda Robeson Program Analyst
EXHIBIT (10)(152)(ii)


 


	 	State of Delaware

        Secretary of State

        Division of Corporations

        Delivered 12:00 PM 12/01/2014

        FILED 12:00 PM 12/01/2014

        SRV 141478010 – 5648964
        FILE



 


STATE of DELAWARE


CERTIFICATE of
INCORPORATION


A STOCK CORPORATION


 


		·	First:
                                         The name of this Corporation is Attitude Beer Holding Co.



 


		·	Second:
                                         Its registered office in the State of Delaware is to be located at 1209 Orange Street,
                                         in the City of Wilmington County of New Castle Zip Code 19801. The registered agent in
                                         charge thereof is The Corporation Trust Company.



 


		·	Third: The purpose of the corporation is to engage in any lawful
act or activity for which corporations may be organized under the General Corporation Law of Delaware.



 


		·	Fourth: The amount of the total stock of this corporation is
authorized to issue is 50,000,000 shares (number of authorized shares) with a par value of 0.0000100000 per share.



 


		·	Fifth: The name and mailing address of the incorporator are
as follows:



 


	 	Name 	Roy G. Warren


 


	 	Mailing Address 	712 U.S. Highway 1 #200
	 	 	North Palm Beach F1 Zip Code 33408


 


		·	I,
                                         The Undersigned, for the purpose of forming a corporation under the laws of the State
                                         of Delaware, do make, file and record this Certificate, and do certify that the facts
                                         herein stated are true, and I have accordingly hereunto set my hand this 24 day of November,
                                         A.D. 2014.



 


	 	BY:	/s/
    Roy G. Warren
	 	 	(Incorporator)
	 	 	 
	 	NAME: 	Roy
    G. Warren
	 	 	(type or print)
§ 1002.57 Is all service as a member of the National Guard considered “service in the uniformed services?” The National Guard has a dual status. It is a Reserve component of the Army, or, in the case of the Air National Guard, of the Air Force. Simultaneously, it is a State military force subject to call-up by the State Governor for duty not subject to Federal control, such as emergency duty in cases of floods or riots. National Guard members may perform service under either Federal or State authority, but only Federal National Guard service is covered by USERRA. ( a ) National Guard service under Federal authority is protected by USERRA. Service under Federal authority includes active duty performed under Title 10 of the United States Code. Service under Federal authority also includes duty under Title 32 of the United States Code, such as active duty for training, inactive duty training, or full-time National Guard duty.
( b ) National Guard service under authority of State law is not protected by USERRA. However, many States have laws protecting the civilian job rights of National Guard members who serve under State orders. Enforcement of those State laws is not covered by USERRA or these regulations.
###### Editorial Note on Part 479

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 479 appear by T.D. ATF-487, 68 FR 3752, Jan. 24, 2003.

#### § 479.91 Unserviceable firearms.

An unserviceable firearm may be transferred as a curio or ornament without payment of the transfer tax. However, the procedures for the transfer of a firearm as provided in § 479.90 shall be followed in a tax-exempt transfer of a firearm under this section, except a statement shall be entered on the transfer application, Form 5 (Firearms), by the transferor that he is entitled to the exemption because the firearm to be transferred is unservicable and is being transferred as a curio or ornament. An unapproved transfer, the transfer of a firearm under the provisions of this section which is in fact not an unserviceable firearm, or the transfer of an unserviceable firearm as something other than a curio or ornament, may subject the transferor to civil and criminal liabilities. (See 26 U.S.C. 5811, 5852, 5861, and 5871.)

[36 FR 14256, Aug. 3, 1971. Redesignated at 40 FR 16835, Apr. 15, 1975, and amended by T.D. ATF-48, 44 FR 55843, Sept. 28, 1979]
#### Samuel Klar and Another v. Tobias Schwartz.

Motion denied, with ten dollars costs. -Order to be settled on notice. Present—Ingraham, P. J., McLaughlin, Laughlin, Clarke and Scott, JJ.