alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

DAY HIGH

 673

 702

 714

 705

 723

 753

 760

 778

 772

 761

 777

 800

 796

 780

 777

 760

 744

 760

 761

 714

 724

 744

 755

 752

 764

 780

 775

 780

 453

 447

 442

 442

 442

 437

 435

 434

 429

 429

 433

 428

 428

 426

 422

 428

 428

 413

 411

 410

 412

 409

 408

 389

 381

 378

 379

 383

 528

 543

 533

 536

 542

 551

 548

 556

 563

 552

 556

 559

 573

 551

 552

 558

 555

 552

 523

 512

 531

 534

 536

 527

 552

 512

 530

 546

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

FEBRUARY 2007 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: March 8, 2007

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

DELTA MENDOTA CANAL AT CHECK 13 (O'NEILL)
§ 10.701 Who may serve as a representative? A claimant may authorize any individual to represent him or her in regard to a claim under the FECA, unless that individual's service as a representative would violate any applicable provision of law (such as 18 U.S.C. 205 and 208). A Federal employee may act as a representative only: ( a ) On behalf of immediate family members, defined as a spouse, children, parents, and siblings of the representative, provided no fee or gratuity is charged; or
( b ) While acting as a union representative, defined as any officially sanctioned union official, and no fee or gratuity is charged.
Exhibit 10.27

Amendment to Consulting Agreement between the Registrant
and Miron Leshem dated December 12, 1995.

<PAGE>

     AMENDMENT TO INDEPENDENT CONTRACTOR AGREEMENT

THE  AMENDMENT  is made and entered  into this 12th day of December  1995 by and
between Debbie Reynolds Hotel & Casino, Inc. (client),  with its principal place
of business in Las Vegas,  Nevada and Miron Leshem,  an independent  contractor,
("ML"),  with his place of business at 108 Sagamore Rd. Apt # 53,  Tuckahoe,  NY
10707.

                                    RECITALS

WHEREAS,  Client and ML entered into an Independent  Contractor  Agreement dated
November  6, 1995  (the  "Agreement")  under  which ML is  providing  consulting
services to Client with respect to  shareholder  relations,  the  maintenance of
market makers and strategic planning;

WHEREAS,  Client  and ML  have  mutually  agreed  to  extend  the  terms  of the
Agreement.

NOW,  THEREFORE,  IN  CONSIDERATION  of the promises and mutual covenants hereby
contained, it is hereby agreed as follows:

                                   AGREEMENTS

Sections 1 and 3 of the Agreement are hereby amended to read as follows:

1.   Terms of Contract

This agreement  will become  effective on November 6, 1995, and will continue in
effect for a period of twelve (12) months unless earlier terminated  pursuant to
Section 5 of this Agreement.

3.   Compensation

<PAGE>

3.1 Stock.  Client and ML  acknowledge  that ML has  received  fifteen  thousand
(15,000) shares of Client's  free-trading  common stock as compensation  for its
services  hereunder.  Client  and ML agree that ML shall  receive an  additional
twenty  thousand  (20,000)  shares  of  Client's  free-trading  common  stock as
additional compensation for its services hereunder.

Except as set forth above,  the  provisions of the Agreement  shall be unchanged
and shall remain in full force and effect.

IN WITNESS  WHEREOF,  the parties  hereto have executed this Amendment as of the
date first written above.

CLIENT:                       DEBBIE REYNOLDS HOTEL & CASINO, INC.

                              By:  /s/ Todd Fisher
                                   ---------------------
                                   Its:  CEO
                                   ---------------------
          
ML:                           MIRON LESHEM

                               By:  /s/ Miron Leshem
                                   ---------------------
```

[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 70 (Tuesday, April 12, 2011)]
[Notices]
[Page 20363]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2011-8688]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY

U.S. Customs and Border Protection

Accreditation and Approval of Atlantic Product Services, Inc., as 
a Commercial Gauger and Laboratory

AGENCY: U.S. Customs and Border Protection, Department of Homeland 
Security.

ACTION: Notice of accreditation and approval of Atlantic Product 
Services, Inc., as a commercial gauger and laboratory.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given that, pursuant to 19 CFR 151.12 and 19 
CFR 151.13, Atlantic Product Services, Inc., 2 Terminal Road Building 
OB2, Carteret, NJ 07008, has been approved to gauge and accredited to 
test petroleum and petroleum products for customs purposes, in 
accordance with the provisions of 19 CFR 151.12 and 19 CFR 151.13. 
Anyone wishing to employ this entity to conduct laboratory analyses and 
gauger services should request and receive written assurances from the 
entity that it is accredited or approved by the U.S. Customs and Border 
Protection to conduct the specific test or gauger service requested. 
Alternatively, inquires regarding the specific test or gauger service 
this entity is accredited or approved to perform may be directed to the 
U.S. Customs and Border Protection by calling (202) 344-1060. The 
inquiry may also be sent to [email protected]. Please reference the Web 
site listed below for a complete listing of CBP approved gaugers and 
accredited laboratories. http://cbp.gov/xp/cgov/import/operations_support/labs_scientific_svcs/commercial_gaugers/

DATES: The accreditation and approval of Atlantic Product Services, 
Inc., as commercial gauger and laboratory became effective on December 
9, 2010. The next triennial inspection date will be scheduled for 
December 2013.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Anthony Malana, Laboratories and 
Scientific Services, U.S. Customs and Border Protection, 1300 
Pennsylvania Avenue, NW., Suite 1500N, Washington, DC 20229, 202-344-
1060.

    Dated: April 1, 2011.
Ira S. Reese,
Executive Director, Laboratories and Scientific Services.
[FR Doc. 2011-8688 Filed 4-11-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9111-14-P
```
§ 220.130 Work experience as a vocational factor. ( a ) General. Work experience means skills and abilities the claimant has acquired through work he or she has done which show the type of work he or she may be expected to do. Work the claimant has already been able to do shows the kind of work that he or she may be expected to do. The Board considers that the claimant's work experience is relevant and applies when it was done within the last 15 years, lasted long enough for him or her to learn to do it, and was substantial gainful activity. This work experience is called “past relevant work.” The Board does not usually consider that work the claimant did 15 years or more before the time the Board is deciding whether he or she is disabled (or when the disability insured status requirement was last met, if earlier) applies. A gradual change occurs in most jobs so that after 15 years, it is no longer realistic to expect that skills and abilities acquired in a job done then continue to apply. The 15-year guide is intended to insure that remote work experience is not currently applied. If the claimant has no work experience or worked only “off-and-on” or for brief periods of time during the 15-year period, the Board generally considers that these do not apply. If the claimant has acquired skills through his or her past work, the Board considers the claimant to have these work skills unless he or she cannot use them in other skilled or semi-skilled work that he or she can do. If the claimant cannot use his or her skills in other skilled or semi-skilled work, the Board will consider his or her work background the same as unskilled. However, even if the claimant has no work experience, the Board may consider that the claimant is able to do unskilled work because it requires little or no judgment and can be learned in a short period of time.
( b ) *Information about the claimant's work.* ( 1 ) Sometimes the Board will need information about the claimant's past work to make a disability determination. The Board may request work information from— ( i ) The claimant; and
( ii ) The claimant's employer or other person who knows about the claimant's work (member of family or co-worker) with the claimant's permission.
( 2 ) The Board will ask for the following information about all the jobs the claimant has had in the last 15 years: ( i ) The dates the claimant worked.
( ii ) All the duties the claimant did.
( iii ) Any tools, machinery, and equipment the claimant used.
( iv ) The amount of walking, standing, sitting, lifting and carrying the claimant did during the work day, as well as any other physical and mental duties of the job.
( 3 ) If all the claimant's work in the past 15 years has been arduous and unskilled, and the claimant has very little education, the Board will ask the claimant to tell about all of his or her work from the time he or she first began working. (See § 220.45(b).)
A-AA+Skip to content

                  - Home
                  - Compendium Statistics
                  - Event
                  - Archives
                  - Glossary
                  - Help
                  - Contact
                  - Research on Disability

Annual Disability Statistics Compendium

              - Home /
              - Archives /
              - 2012 Compendium Statistics /
              - 2012 Time Trend Population Statistics /
              - 2012 3.7 Labor Market Attachment Rate among Civilians Ages 16-64 by Disability Status and Year

## Table 3.7: Labor Market Attachment Rate among Non-institutionalized Civilians Ages 16 to 64 by Disability Status and Year, 1980-2011

----

----

 

----

#### 2012 Disability Compendium

                        - Home
                        - Compendium Statistics                           - Population and Prevelance
                          - Employment
                          - Time Trend Population Statistics
                          - Poverty
                          - Earnings
                          - Veterans
                          - Health Insurance Coverage
                          - Health
                          - Social Security Administration Programs
                          - Medicaid and Medicare
                          - Special Education
                          - Vocational Rehabilitation
                          - Federal Government Spending and Employment
                          - International Disability Statistics
                          - Population Statistics: Disability Type
                        - Event
                        - Archives                           - 2012 Compendium Statistics
                        - Glossary
                        - Help
                        - Contact
                        - Research on Disability

#### Funding for this project is made possible by:

 The Research and Training Center on Disability Statistics and Demographics (StatsRRTC), which is funded by the U.S. Department of Education, National Institute for Disability and Rehabilitation Research, under cooperative agreements H133B080012.

#### Stay Connected

**Institute on Disability**10 West Edge Drive, Suite 101Durham, NH 03824603.862.4320 | relay: 711 | [email protected]www.iod.unh.edu

© 2013. Institute on Disability.University of New Hampshire.
### §2301. Sense of Congress

It is the sense of Congress that—

(1) the United States should apply economic and other financial sanctions to foreign traffickers of illicit opioids to protect the national security, foreign policy, and economy of the United States and the health of the people of the United States;

(2) it is imperative that the People's Republic of China follow through on full implementation of the new regulations, adopted May 1, 2019, to treat all fentanyl analogues as controlled substances under the laws of the People's Republic of China, including by devoting sufficient resources for implementation and strict enforcement of the new regulations; and

(3) the effective enforcement of the new regulations should result in diminished trafficking of illicit fentanyl originating from the People's Republic of China into the United States.

(Pub. L. 116–92, div. F, title LXXII, §7202, Dec. 20, 2019, 133 Stat. 2262.)

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Short Title

Pub. L. 116–92, div. F, title LXXII, §7201, Dec. 20, 2019, 133 Stat. 2262, provided that: "This title [enacting this chapter and amending section 2291h of Title 22, Foreign Relations and Intercourse] may be cited as the 'Fentanyl Sanctions Act'."
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the Court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 00-30869 Summary Calendar
STEFANIE RIVIERE; THOMAS STURDEVANT, Plaintiffs-Appellants,
versus BANNER CHEVROLET, INC.; ET AL., Defendant, BANNER CHEVROLET, INC., Defendant-Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Louisiana (USDC No. 95-CV-3816-T)

_______________________________________________________ January 19, 2001 Before REAVLEY, JOLLY and JONES, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: *2



### Stefanie Riviere and Thomas Sturdevant appeal from the judgment of the district court dismissing their claim under the Truth in Lending Act, 15 U.S.C. §§ 1601-77. The district court has made the determination directed by the panel of this court on the prior appeal. The finding that the truck’s purchase was made for business purposes is not clearly erroneous. The Act does not apply. AFFIRMED.
§ 222.52 When a legally adopted child is dependent—general. ( a ) *During employee's lifetime.* If the employee adopts a child before he or she could become entitled to a social security benefit (treating his or her railroad compensation as wages under that Act), the child is considered dependent upon the employee. If the employee adopts a child, unless the child is his natural child or stepchild, after he or she could become entitled to an old age or disability benefit under the Social Security Act (treating his or her railroad compensation as wages under that Act), the child is considered dependent on the employee only if the requirements of § 222.53 are met.
( b ) *After employee's death.* If the surviving spouse of an employee adopted a child after the employee's death, the child is considered dependent on the employee if either— ( 1 ) The employee began proceedings to adopt the child prior to his or her death, or the surviving spouse adopted the child within two years after the employee's death; and
( 2 ) The child was living in the employee's household at the time of the employee's death; and
( 3 ) The child was not receiving regular contributions from any person, including any public or private welfare organization, other than the employee or spouse at the time of the employee's death.
### §2395. Limitation for certain students

No funds received under this chapter may be used to provide career and technical education programs or programs of study to students prior to the the 1 middle grades (as such term is defined in section 7801 of this title), except that equipment and facilities purchased with funds under this chapter may be used by such students.

(Pub. L. 88–210, title II, §215, formerly title III, §315, as added Pub. L. 109–270, §1(b), Aug. 12, 2006, 120 Stat. 744; renumbered title II, §215, and amended Pub. L. 115–224, title II, §201(a)(3), (5), (6), July 31, 2018, 132 Stat. 1621.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Prior Provisions

A prior section 2395, Pub. L. 88–210, title III, §315, as added Pub. L. 105–332, §1(b), Oct. 31, 1998, 112 Stat. 3123, imposed a limitation for certain students, prior to the general amendment of this chapter by Pub. L. 109–270.

Another prior section 2395 and prior sections 2395a to 2395e were omitted in the general amendment of this chapter by Pub. L. 105–332.

Section 2395, Pub. L. 88–210, title III, §351, as added Pub. L. 101–392, title III, §309, Sept. 25, 1990, 104 Stat. 792, stated purpose of supplementary State grant program.

Section 2395a, Pub. L. 88–210, title III, §352, as added Pub. L. 101–392, title III, §309, Sept. 25, 1990, 104 Stat. 793, related to allotment to States.

Section 2395b, Pub. L. 88–210, title III, §353, as added Pub. L. 101–392, title III, §309, Sept. 25, 1990, 104 Stat. 793, related to allocations to local educational agencies.

Section 2395c, Pub. L. 88–210, title III, §354, as added Pub. L. 101–392, title III, §309, Sept. 25, 1990, 104 Stat. 793, related to use of grant funds.

Section 2395d, Pub. L. 88–210, title III, §355, as added Pub. L. 101–392, title III, §309, Sept. 25, 1990, 104 Stat. 793, related to State applications for grants.

Section 2395e, Pub. L. 88–210, title III, §356, as added Pub. L. 101–392, title III, §309, Sept. 25, 1990, 104 Stat. 794, related to local applications for grants.

#### Amendments

2018—Pub. L. 115–224, §201(a)(3), inserted "or programs of study" after "career and technical education programs" and substituted "the middle grades (as such term is defined in section 7801 of this title)" for "seventh grade".

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date of 2018 Amendment

Amendment by Pub. L. 115–224 effective July 1, 2019, see section 4 of Pub. L. 115–224, set out as a note under section 2301 of this title.

1 So in original.
§ 220.45 Providing evidence of disability. ( a ) *General.* The claimant for a disability annuity is responsible for providing evidence of the claimed disability and the effect of the disability on the ability to work. The Board will assist the claimant, when necessary, in obtaining the required evidence. At its discretion, the Board will arrange for an examination by a consultant at the expense of the Board as explained in §§ 220.50 and 220.51.
( b ) *Kind of evidence.* The claimant must provide medical evidence showing that he or she has an impairment(s) and how severe it is during the time the claimant claims to be disabled. The Board will consider only impairment(s) the claimant claims to have or about which the Board receives evidence. Before deciding that the claimant is not disabled, the Board will develop a complete medical history (i.e., evidence from the records of the claimant's medical sources) covering at least the preceding 12 months, unless the claimant says that his or her disability began less than 12 months before he or she filed an application. The Board will make every reasonable effort to help the claimant in getting medical reports from his or her own medical sources when the claimant gives the Board permission to request them. Every reasonable effort means that the Board will make an initial request and, after 20 days, one follow-up request to the claimant's medical source to obtain the medical evidence necessary to make a determination before the Board evaluates medical evidence obtained from another source on a consultative basis. The medical source will have 10 days from the follow-up request to reply (unless experience indicates that a longer period is advisable in a particular case). In order to expedite processing the Board may order a consultative exam from a non-treating source while awaiting receipt of medical source evidence. If the Board ask the claimant to do so, he or she must contact the medical sources to help us get the medical reports. The Board may also ask the claimant to provide evidence about his or her— ( 1 ) Age;
( 2 ) Education and training;
( 3 ) Work experience;
( 4 ) Daily activities both before and after the date the claimant says that he or she became disabled;
( 5 ) Efforts to work; and
( 6 ) Any other evidence showing how the claimant's impairment(s) affects his or her ability to work. (In §§ 220.125 through 220.134, we discuss in more detail the evidence the Board needs when it considers vocational factors.)
(Approved by the Office of Management and Budget under control numbers 3220-0002, 3220-0030, 3220-0106 and 3220-0141)
In The 

Court of Appeals 

Seventh District of Texas at Amarillo

________________________

No. 07-20-00165-CV 

________________________

UNITED PHOSPHORUS, LTD., UPL CORPORATION, LIMITED, 

AND UNITED PHOSPHORUS, INC., APPELLANTS 

 

V. 

 

PETER BALDERAS AND MARTHA BALDERAS, INDIVIDUALLY AND 

ON BEHALF OF THEIR INJURED AND DECEASED MINOR CHILDREN, 

P.B. AND E.B., INJURED MINORS, AND F.B., J.B., J.B., AND Y.B., DECEASED 

MINOR CHILDREN, AND JACQUELINE BALDERAS, INDIVIDUALLY, 

AND CASANDRA BALDERAS, INDIVIDUALLY, APPELLEES 

 

 

On Permissive Appeal from the 108th District Court 

Potter County, Texas 

Trial Court No. 106,846-E-CV; Honorable Douglas R. Woodburn, Presiding 

 

December 30, 2020 

 

MEMORANDUM OPINION 

 

Before QUINN, C.J., and PIRTLE and DOSS, JJ.

On July 28, 2020, we granted the Petition for Permissive Appeal filed by

Appellants, United Phosphorus, Ltd., UPL Corporation, Limited, and United Phosphorus, 

Inc., permitting an interlocutory appeal from the trial court’s Amended Order Denying
2

Defendants’ Motion for Summary Judgment Regarding FIFRA. See TEX. CIV. PRAC. &

REM. CODE ANN. § 51.014(d) (West 2015); TEX. R. APP. P. 28.3. On November 16, 2020, 

we abated the appeal pursuant to the parties’ motion to allow the parties to complete their 

settlement negotiations.

The appeal has been reinstated. Now pending before the court is the parties’ joint 

motion notifying the court that all matters in controversy have been compromised and 

settled and seeking voluntary dismissal of the appeal. The court finds the motion 

complies with the requirements of Rule of Appellate Procedure 42.1(a)(1) and that 

granting the motion will not prevent any party from seeking relief to which it would 

otherwise be entitled. As no decision of the court has been delivered to date, we grant 

the motion. The appeal is dismissed. Because the motion does not address costs, costs

will be taxed against Appellants. TEX. R. APP. P. 42.1(d). No motion for rehearing will be 

entertained and our mandate will issue forthwith.

Per Curiam
Exhibit 32
 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
  /s/ Richard T. Riley

Richard T. RileyChairman, President and Chief Executive Officer/s/ John Barrett

John BarrettInterim Chief Financial Officer (Principal Financial Officer)