alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Editorial Note on Part 53
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 53 appear by T.D. ATF-447, 66 FR 19088, Apr. 13, 2001.

§ 53.23 Alternate methods or procedures. ( a ) A taxpayer, on specific approval by the appropriate TTB officer as provided in this section, may use an alternate method or procedure in lieu of a method or procedure specifically prescribed in this part. The appropriate TTB officer may approve an alternate method or procedure, subject to stated conditions, when— ( 1 ) Good cause has been shown for the use of the alternate method or procedure;
( 2 ) The alternate method or procedure is within the purpose of, and consistent with the effect intended by, the specifically prescribed method or procedure, and affords equivalent security to the revenue; and
( 3 ) The alternate method or procedure will not be contrary to any provision of law and will not result in an increase in cost to the Government or hinder the effective administration of this part. No alternate method or procedure relating to the assessment, payment, or collection of tax shall be authorized under this paragraph.
( b ) Where the taxpayer desires to employ an alternate method or procedure, a written application to do so must be submitted. The application must specifically describe the proposed alternate method or procedure and must set forth the reasons therefor. Alternate methods or procedures must not be employed until the appropriate TTB officer has approved the application. The taxpayer must, during the period of authorization of an alternate method or procedure, comply with the terms of the approved application. Authorization for any alternate method or procedure may be withdrawn whenever, in the judgment of the appropriate TTB officer, the revenue is jeopardized or the effective administration of this part is hindered by the continuation of such authorization.
[T.D. ATF-365, 60 FR 33670, June 28, 1995, as amended by T.D. ATF-447, 66 FR 19088, Apr. 13, 2001]
# Fourth Court of Appeals

**San Antonio, Texas**

JUDGMENT

No. 04

- 15

- 00755

- CR

Juan Carlos PALOMARES

, Appellant

v.

The STATE of Texas,

Appellee

From the 406th Judicial District Court, Webb County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2015CRS000530 D4

Honorable Oscar J. Hale, Jr., Judge Presiding

BEFORE CHIEF JUSTICE MARION

, JUSTICE MARTINEZ , AND JUSTICE CHAPA

In accordance with this court’s opinion of this date, the judgment of the trial court is

AFFIRMED.

SIGNED November 23, 2016.

_____________________________ Luz Elena D. Chapa, Justice
###### Editorial Note on Part 479

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 479 appear by T.D. ATF-487, 68 FR 3752, Jan. 24, 2003.

#### § 479.118 Proof of exportation.

Within a six-month's period from date of issuance of the permit to export firearms, the exporter shall furnish or cause to be furnished to the Director (a) the certificate of exportation (Part 3 of Form 9 (Firearms)) executed by the District Director of Customs as provided in § 479.117, or (b) the certificate of mailing by parcel post (Part 4 of Form 9 (Firearms)) executed by the postmaster of the post office receiving the parcel containing the firearm, or (c) a certificate of landing executed by a Customs officer of the foreign country to which the firearm is exported, or (d) a sworn statement of the foreign consignee covering the receipt of the firearm, or (e) the return receipt, or a reproduced copy thereof, signed by the addressee or his agent, where the shipment of a firearm was made by insured or registered parcel post. Issuance of a permit to export a firearm and furnishing of evidence establishing such exportation under this section will relieve the actual exporter and the person selling to the exporter for exportation from transfer tax liability. Where satisfactory evidence of exportation of a firearm is not furnished within the stated period, the transfer tax will be assessed.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY HIGH

 10,260

 8,225

 3,281

 1,661

 810

 883

 1,454

 1,902

 1,476

 332

 301

 772

 1,078

 2,040

 1,252

 1,285

 2,787

 4,685

 7,068

 8,807

 16,849

 17,625

 15,859

 18,375

 19,178

 20,889

 19,246

 18,430

 16,084

 14,418

 13,034

 1,283

 1,526

 734

 403

 345

 280

 277

 261

 269

 244

 236

 236

 231

 236

 240

 237

 248

 247

 244

 267

 607

 2,941

 1,613

 1,360

 3,136

 3,971

 3,821

 3,521

 3,417

 3,015

 2,757

 5,115

 4,275

 1,618

 733

 442

 378

 408

 460

 411

 284

 269

 291

 332

 419

 343

 359

 492

 989

 2,766

 3,974

 7,968

 8,662

 7,496

 8,407

 10,460

 12,406

 11,387

 10,834

 9,531

 8,462

 7,636

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

JANUARY 2002 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: February 12, 2002

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

PORT CHICAGO BOTTOM IN SUISUN BAY
!

! !

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

6S

22E

6S

23E

7S

22E

6S

21E

7S

23E

7S

21E

022

007

011

034

036

027

019

018

013

023

007

012

024

018

015

021

019

031

030

010

020

033

030

025

008

017

026

029

028

016

035

009

031 032

014

005 004 006

006

003

001

002

012

002

013

001

024

003

006

025

004

036

005 006

032

001

029

020

001

017

005

Old Corral

McLeod Flat

Cedar Valley

Willow Creek

Calvin Crest

Sivels Ranch

Soquel Meadow

Poison Meadow

Redwood Creek

Greys Mountain

Chilkoot Creek

Gooseberry Flat

Sivels Mountain

Chipmunk Meadow

Bass Lake Vista

Graham Mountain

Paradise Springs

California Creek

Soquel Campground

Soquel Meadow Ranch

Cold Springs Meadow

Chilkoot Campground

Nelder Grove Campground

Greys Mountain Campground

Texas Flat Group Campground

05S007

06S010

06S008

06S090

06S040

06S038

06S013

06S042

06S011

06S036

06S006

06S010X

06S040X

MAD222

06S097

06S099

06S057

05S095

05S019

06S088

06S072

06S039

06S040XB

06S010XC

05S018

06S098

MAD632

07S082

07S520B

06S095

06S058X

06S002X

06S010R

06S011A

05S019B

06S018

06S057A

06S047Y

05S039

07S006

06S011X

06S040XA

07S019

05S007N

06S013B

06S070

06S006G

06S028

06S038C

06S006F

06S026X

06S072Y

06S011C

06S008C

05S095YC

07S520

06S038A

06S090B

06S065

06S013D

05S007R

06S010Y

05S007T

06S038X

06S090E

06S013H

06S002XB

05S095Y

06S028B

06S010YB

06S040D

06S032

06S088D

06S504

06S013G

06S036A

06S047YA

05S007Z

06S013C

06S013F

06S008A

06S011B

06S038E

06S006C 06S010A

06S013A

06S095A

06S011E

06S011F

06S013E

06S012B

05S007TA

06S098B

06S010YA

06S002XA

06S039A

06S072A

06S099B

06S097A

06S006A

06S028A

06S090G

06S065A 06S010B

008

005

Scale

0 0.25 0.5 1 1.5 2

Miles

4 Legend

Designated OHV Routes

Private Property

Project Boundary

Grey's Mountain Ecological Restoration Project Map 14

Designated OHV Routes

Burt Stalter 11/2011

1:48,000
Electrical Conductivity, UMHOS

Day High Low Mean

1 22,019 12,235 17,991

2 19,317 10,928 16,531

3 19,035 10,093 15,187

4 19,063 9,824 14,572

5 18,862 9,147 14,388

6 21,715 9,459 16,298

7 22,447 12,359 16,984

8 22,142 12,979 16,807

9 21,179 11,852 16,460

10 21,875 11,695 16,661

11 23,472 12,327 18,010

12 25,011 12,694 18,815

13 24,479 12,098 18,651

14 24,440 12,410 18,598

15 24,239 12,065 18,654

16 22,363 12,418 18,606

17 21,613 12,554 18,235

18 21,004 12,602 18,091

19 22,392 13,734 18,446

20 23,419 13,305 17,772

21 22,202 11,772 16,587

22 23,234 11,912 16,795

23 21,197 10,150 15,674

24 20,542 8,745 14,897

25 20,180 8,165 14,499

26 19,693 8,182 14,184

27 20,414 9,113 15,070

28 19,072 8,847 14,686

29 21,414 8,365 15,252

30 17,436 9,385 13,885

31 15,612 7,817 12,454

COMMENT(S):

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

Historical Archive and Report Database

Port Chicago Top In Suisun Bay 

Period: December 2023 Run Date: 1/17/2024
(No. 6308

#### Lawrence Jones, Claimant, *vs.*State of Illinois, Department of Children and Family Services, Respondent.

*164
      *Opinion filed December 15, 1972.*

Lawrence Jones, Claimant, pro se.

William J. Scott, Attorney General; Saul R. Wexler, Assistant Attorney General, for Respondent.

Per Curiam.
### §3606. Standards and safety procedures

#### (a) Establishment and distribution to designated State agency or unit; establishment of criteria for loan program eligibility

(1) Within 120 days after the first meeting of the Task Force, and after consultation with the Task Force, the Secretary shall establish and distribute to the State agency or unit designated under section 3603(a)(4) of this title—

(A) procedures for testing the level of asbestos fibers in schools, including safety measures to be followed in conducting such tests;

(B) standards for evaluating (on the basis of such tests) the likelihood of the leakage of asbestos fibers into the school environment; and

(C) standards for determining which contractors are qualified to carry out the testing and evaluation described in this paragraph.

(2) After consulting with the Task Force, the Secretary shall establish criteria to be used for determining eligibility for loans under section 3605 of this title. The criteria shall be based on the assessment of the extent of the health hazards posed by the presence of asbestos fibers in schools, as determined in accordance with standards under paragraph (1)(B) of this subsection.

#### (b) Establishment of regulations

After reviewing recommendations submitted to the Secretary by the Task Force under section 3602(e)(5) of this title, the Secretary, with the concurrence of the Task Force, shall by regulation establish—

(1) procedures to be used by local educational agencies, in programs for which loans are made under section 3605 of this title, for—

(A) containing and removing asbestos materials in school buildings;

(B) replacing the asbestos materials removed from school buildings with other appropriate building materials; and

(C) restoring such school buildings to conditions comparable to those existing before asbestos containment or removal activities were undertaken; and

(2) standards for determining which contractors are qualified to carry out the activities referred to in paragraph (1).

#### (c) Avoidance of duplication of similar activities of Environmental Protection Agency

In carrying out his duties under this section, the Secretary shall avoid, to the maximum extent practicable, duplicating similar activities undertaken by the Environmental Protection Agency.

(Pub. L. 96–270, §7, June 14, 1980, 94 Stat. 494.)
§ 229.31 When a spouse can be included in the computation of the overall minimum rate. ( a ) A spouse who is married to the employee when the employee's application is filed can be included in the computation of the overall minimum rate beginning in the later of the month in which: ( 1 ) The employee first is eligible for an increase in his or her annuity under the overall minimum, as shown in § 229.22 of this part; or
( 2 ) The spouse first becomes eligible to be included under the overall minimum, as shown in § 229.30 of this part.
( b ) A spouse who marries the employee after the employee application is filed can be included in the overall minimum computation in the month in which he or she becomes eligible, as shown in § 229.30 of this part, if the overall minimum rate is already payable in the previous month. If the railroad formula rate is payable in the month before the spouse becomes eligible, the spouse can be included in the overall minimum computation in the later of the month in which: ( 1 ) The employee first is eligible for an increase in his or her annuity rate under the overall minimum, as shown in § 229.22; or
( 2 ) The spouse annuity begins.
-       - Superintendent of Documents
      - 2023-09-01T21:42:22-0400
      - Government Publishing Office, Washington, DC 20401
      - Government Publishing Office
      - Government Publishing Office attests that this document has not been altered since it was disseminated by Government Publishing Office
#### § 10.717 Is a settlement or judgment received as a result of allegations of medical malpractice in treating an injury covered by the FECA a gross recovery that must be reported to OWCP or SOL?

Since an injury caused by medical malpractice in treating an injury covered by the FECA is also an injury covered under the FECA, any recovery in a suit alleging such an injury is treated as a gross recovery that must be reported to OWCP or SOL.
A-AA+Skip to content

                  - Home
                  - Compendium Statistics
                  - Event
                  - Archives
                  - Glossary
                  - Help
                  - Contact
                  - Research on Disability

Annual Disability Statistics Compendium

              - Home /
              - Compendium Statistics /
              - Social Security Administration Programs /
              - 9.5b Social Security Disability Insurance—Number of Beneficiaries

## Table 9.5b: Social Security Disability Insurance—Number of Beneficiaries by Disability Type: December 2011

----

----

 

----

#### 2012 Disability Compendium

                        - Home
                        - Compendium Statistics                           - Population and Prevelance
                          - Employment
                          - Time Trend Population Statistics
                          - Poverty
                          - Earnings
                          - Veterans
                          - Health Insurance Coverage
                          - Health
                          - Social Security Administration Programs
                          - Medicaid and Medicare
                          - Special Education
                          - Vocational Rehabilitation
                          - Federal Government Spending and Employment
                          - International Disability Statistics
                          - Population Statistics: Disability Type
                        - Event
                        - Archives                           - 2012 Compendium Statistics
                        - Glossary
                        - Help
                        - Contact
                        - Research on Disability

#### Funding for this project is made possible by:

 The Research and Training Center on Disability Statistics and Demographics (StatsRRTC), which is funded by the U.S. Department of Education, National Institute for Disability and Rehabilitation Research, under cooperative agreements H133B080012.

#### Stay Connected

**Institute on Disability**10 West Edge Drive, Suite 101Durham, NH 03824603.862.4320 | relay: 711 | [email protected]www.iod.unh.edu

© 2013. Institute on Disability.University of New Hampshire.
### IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 14

- 30433

BRIAN M. ALLEN , on behalf of the United States of America and those similarly situated,

Plaintiff

- Appellant

v.

ANN KELLER , Judge, in her official capacity and individually ; VALERY HOWARD; DEPARTMENT OF CHILDREN AND FAMILY SERVICES STATE OF LOUISIANA; JEFFERSON PARISH DISTRICT ATTORNEY,

Defendants

- Appellees

Appeal s from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Louisiana USDC No. 2:13

- CV

- 233

Before JOLLY , HIGGI NSON and COSTA , Circuit Judges

. PER CURIAM: *
Plaintiff Brian Allen was ordered to pay child support after a paternity
test determined with 99.99% certainty that he was the biological father of a
minor child. He failed to do so and as a result was incarcerated multiple times in Jefferson Parish, Louisiana. Allen filed suit against the above

- named

* Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the li mited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit 

### FILED May 11, 2015 Lyle W. Cayce Clerk Case: 14-30433 Document: 00513037749 Page: 1 Date Filed: 05/11/2015No. 14

- 30433 defendants , asserting a qui tam action under the False Claims Act as well as a civil rights action under Title VI and 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The district court granted the defendants’ respective motions to dismiss under Rules 12(b)(1) and 12(b)(6) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure.
This case is now before us on a ppeal. We have reviewed carefully the complaint and incorporated attachments . We have considered the parties’
briefs

. Finally, we have heard oral argument. We find no reversible error in the proceedings before the district court, and, consequently, t he judgment of
the district court is AFFIRMED. See 5th Cir. R. 47.6.

2 Case: 14-30433 Document: 00513037749 Page: 2 Date Filed: 05/11/2015
(No. 74-CC-134

#### Clarence E. Boyd, M.D., Claimant, *vs.*State of Illinois, Division of Vocational Rehabilitation, Respondent.

*Opinion filed May 15, 1974.*

*406Clarence E. Boyd, M.D., Claimant, pro se.

William J. Scott, Attorney General; Howard W. Feldman, Assistant Attorney General, for Respondent.

Per Curiam.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

DAY HIGH

 1,136

 1,026

 1,000

 1,057

 1,060

 1,058

 1,066

 1,061

 1,016

 1,050

 1,044

 1,047

 1,056

 1,066

 1,047

 1,004

 1,021

 1,018

 991

 1,007

 995

 992

 992

 975

 966

 984

 1,004

 990

 246

 246

 240

 234

 227

 226

 226

 235

 230

 224

 222

 220

 223

 223

 219

 231

 250

 224

 222

 229

 232

 247

 239

 238

 240

 239

 225

 225

 592

 504

 481

 550

 532

 528

 580

 580

 557

 563

 521

 511

 515

 511

 467

 484

 573

 551

 528

 506

 513

 568

 524

 525

 495

 497

 495

 483

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

FEBRUARY 2003 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: March 4, 2003

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

DELTA MENDOTA CANAL AT CHECK 13 (O'NEILL)
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY ELEV

 122.48

 121.95

 121.59

 122.21

 122.95

 122.31

 123.36

 123.19

 123.21

 124.36

 123.67

 123.77

 123.62

 123.13

 122.97

 123.09

 123.12

 123.31

 123.35

 122.86

 122.80

 122.98

 123.45

 123.76

 123.68

 123.73

 123.13

 122.77

 122.50

 122.91

 123.01

 7,557

 7,320

 7,169

 7,436

 7,769

 7,481

 7,960

 7,880

 7,890

 8,441

 8,106

 8,153

 8,082

 7,852

 7,778

 7,833

 7,847

 7,937

 7,956

 7,728

 7,701

 7,782

 8,003

 8,148

 8,111

 8,134

 7,852

 7,688

 7,566

 7,751

 7,796

STORAGE

+287

-237

-151

+267

+333

-288

+479

-80

+10

+551

-335

+47

-71

-230

-74

+55

+14

+90

+19

-228

-27

+81

+221

+145

-37

+23

-282

-164

-122

+185

+45

CHANGE

5,178

4,919

4,959

5,162

5,186

4,871

4,819

4,460

4,511

4,777

4,311

4,499

4,432

4,357

4,448

4,510

4,538

4,582

4,520

4,405

4,525

4,356

4,408

4,349

4,231

4,240

4,101

3,976

3,995

4,155

4,075

INFLOW

 4,062

 4,944

 4,942

 4,934

 4,514

 4,914

 4,484

 4,406

 4,412

 4,405

 4,397

 4,400

 4,394

 4,399

 4,397

 4,080

 2,500

 3,405

 4,358

 4,423

 4,439

 4,216

 4,199

 4,175

 4,172

 4,164

 4,172

 3,975

 3,958

 3,952

 3,952

POWER

 877

 0

 0

 0

 410

 7

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 308

 1,936

 1,037

 56

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

SPILL

 60

 60

 60

 60

 60

 60

 60

 60

 60

 60

 60

 60

 60

 60

 60

 60

 60

 60

 60

 60

 60

 60

 60

 60

 60

 60

 60

 60

 60

 60

 60

HATCHERY

 4

 4

 3

 3

 4

 5

 4

 4

 4

 4

 5

 5

 4

 4

 5

 4

 5

 5

 6

 5

 5

 4

 3

 6

 5

 4

 4

 4

 4

 5

 2

C.F.S.

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

JULY 2022 LAKE NATOMA DAILY OPERATIONS RUN DATE: August 1, 2022

IN LAKE

EVAP

C.F.S.

COMPUTED*

ACRE-FEET

RELEASE - C.F.S.

TOTALS +526 139,855 132,144 4,631 1,860 133

ACRE-FEET +526 277,402 262,108 9,186 3,689 264

COMMENTS:

* COMPUTED INFLOW IS THE SUM OF CHANGE IN STORAGE, RELEASES AND EVAPORATION.

SUMMARY

RELEASES (ACRE-FEET)

POWER 262,108

SPILL 9,186

FOLSOM SOUTH CANAL

HATCHERY

 1,628

 3,689

 7,270

FOLSOM

SOUTH 

 30

 30

 30

 30

 30

 30

 30

 30

 30

 30

 18

 10

 10

 10

 23

 30

 30

 30

 30

 32

 35

 35

 35

 35

 13

 0

 7

 20

 35

 45

 38

 821

 1,628

(1)

(1) INCHES OF EVAPORATION TAKEN FROM FOLSOM PAN.

RELEASES (ACRE-FEET) 

TOTAL 276,611
### SUBCHAPTER IV—NATIONAL CENTER FOR RESEARCH IN ADVANCED INFORMATION AND DIGITAL TECHNOLOGIES
#### § 226.90 When recomputation applies.

An employee's annuity may be recomputed to include additional railroad service and compensation and social security wages which the employee earns after the beginning date of the employee annuity. The annuity is recomputed only if the recomputation increases the annuity rate by more than $1 a month or results in a lump-sum payment of more than $5. Before a recomputed rate can be paid, the employee must stop working in the railroad industry. A recomputed tier I component is payable beginning with January 1 of the year after the year in which the wages or compensation are earned or (provided the employee is age 62 or disabled), in the case of railroad compensation, in the year after the employee stops working in the railroad industry. A recomputed tier II component is payable from the date the annuity is reinstated after the employee has ceased railroad work.
Alcona County Board of Commissioners 

June 7, 2012 

Mr. Dennis DeVany 

Alcona County Building 

P.O. Box 308 

Harrisville, MI 487 40 

Chief, Essential Air Service Division 

Office of Aviation Analysis 

Department of Transportation 

1200 New Jersey Avenue SE, 

Washington, D.C. 20590 

Voice: (989) 724-9410 

Facsimile: (989) 724-9419 

c:,;;:J 

l 

co 

Reference; DOT-OST-2009-0300, Alpena, Michigan Air Service 

Dear Mr. DeVany, 

The Alcona County Board of Commissioners wishes to lend its support to the proposal 

of SkyWest Airlines to provide essential air service at Alpena, Michigan as replacement 

for our current air service. 

Local air service that provides an effective connection to the national and international 

air transportation system is critical to the economic well being of Alpena, Michigan and 

to the surrounding counties as well. Residents in Alcona County rely on local air 

service for both business and leisure travel. 

The SkyWest proposal offers us a 50-seat regional jet with the Delta brand and code 

and service to the Delta hubs of Detroit and Minneapolis. 

We believe the SkyWest air service proposal represents the best option for retaining our 

local air service long term and building up traffic so that government subsidies can 

eventually be reduced or eliminated. 

We urge the Department of Transportation to award SkyWest Airways the designation 

to provide Alpena's Essential Air Service. 

Best regards, 

lsi 

Kevin K. Boyat, Sr. 

Chairman 

Alcona County Board of Commissioners 

"Alcona County is an equal opportunity provider and employer"