20950 Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 72 / Thursday, April 14, 2011 / Notices 

1Nashville Wire Products Inc. and SSW Holding 

Company, Inc. (collectively, ‘‘Petitioners’’) initially 

requested that the Department initiate an 

administrative review of ten companies; however, 

we required additional information concerning 

why, pursuant to 19 CFR 351.213(b)(1), Petitioners 

desired a review of five of these companies. See 

First Initiation, 75 FR at 66352. Accordingly, the 

Department postponed initiation of this 

administrative review with respect to five 

companies requested by Petitioners. See id. and 

Initiation of Antidumping and Countervailing Duty 

Administrative Reviews; Correction, 75 FR 69054 

(November 10, 2010). After reviewing additional 

information placed on the record of this 

administrative review by Petitioners, we 

determined that, for three of the five postponed 

companies, Petitioners did not provide any reason, 

other than alleged transshipment, for initiation; 

therefore, we declined to initiate a review for Asia 

Pacific CIS (Thailand) Co., Ltd., Taiwan Rail 

Company, and King Shan Wire Co., Ltd. See 

Initiation of Antidumping and Countervailing Duty 

Administrative Reviews, 75 FR 73036, 73039 

(November 29, 2010). However, we did, at this 

point, also determine that it was appropriate to 

initiate this review with respect to two additional 

companies originally requested by Petitioners: Asia 

Pacific CIS (Wuxi) Co., Ltd.; and Hengtong 

Hardware Manufacturing (Huizhou) Co., Ltd. See 

id. 

2See Memorandum to James C. Doyle, Office 

Director, Office 9, through Catherine Bertrand, 

Program Manager, Office 9, from Kabir Archuletta, 

International Trade Analyst, Office 9, ‘‘Selection of 

Respondents for the Antidumping Review of 

Certain Kitchen Appliance Shelving and Racks from 

the People’s Republic of China,’’ dated January 20, 

2011. 

3See Letters to Weixi and Wireking from 

Catherine Bertrand, Program Manager, AD/CVD 

Operations, Office 9, regarding ‘‘Kitchen Appliance 

Shelving and Racks from the People’s Republic of 

China,’’ dated January 20, 2011. 

public presentation materials prior to 

the meeting to Ms. Springer via e-mail. 

The Assistant Secretary for 

Administration, with the concurrence of 

the delegate of the General Counsel, 

formally determined on October 15, 

2010, pursuant to Section 10(d) of the 

Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 

amended (5 U.S.C. app. 2 §§ (10)(d)), 

that the portion of the meeting dealing 

with matters the disclosure of portion of 

the meeting dealing with matters the 

disclosure of which would be likely to 

frustrate significantly implementation of 

an agency action as described in 5 

U.S.C. 552b(c)(9)(B) shall be exempt 

from the provisions relating to public 

meetings found in 5 U.S.C. app. 2 

§§ 10(a)1 and 10(a)(3). The remaining 

portions of the meeting will be open to 

the public. 

For more information, call Yvette 

Springer at (202) 482–2813. 

Dated: April 8, 2011. 

Yvette Springer, 

Committee Liaison Officer. 

[FR Doc. 2011–8939 Filed 4–13–11; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 3510–JT–P 

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE 

International Trade Administration 

[A–533–810] 

Stainless Steel Bar From India: 

Extension of Time Limit for the Final 

Results of the 2009–2010 Antidumping 

Duty Administrative Review 

AGENCY: Import Administration, 

International Trade Administration, 

Department of Commerce. 

DATES: Effective Date: April 14, 2011. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Scott Holland or Yasmin Nair, AD/CVD 

Operations, Office 1, Import 

Administration, International Trade 

Administration, U.S. Department of 

Commerce, 14th Street and Constitution 

Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 20230; 

telephone (202) 482–1279 and (202) 

482–3813, respectively. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Background 

On March 4, 2011, the Department of 

Commerce (‘‘Department’’) published its 

preliminary results of the 2009–2010 

antidumping duty administrative 

review. See Stainless Steel Bar From 

India: Preliminary Results of, and 

Partial Rescission of, the Antidumping 

Duty Administrative Review, and Intent 

Not To Revoke the Order, in Part, 76 FR 

12044 (March 4, 2011) (‘‘Preliminary 

Results’’). The final results for this 

review are currently due no later than 

July 2, 2011. 

Extension of Time Limit for Final 

Results 

Section 751(a)(3)(A) of the Tariff Act 

of 1930, as amended (‘‘Act’’), requires 

that the Department issue the final 

results of an administrative review 

within 120 days after the date on which 

the preliminary results are published. If 

it is not practicable to complete the 

review within this time period, section 

751(a)(3)(A) of the Act allows the 

Department to extend the deadline for 

the final results to a maximum of 180 

days after the date on which the 

preliminary results are published. 

The Department has determined that 

it requires additional time to complete 

this review. After publishing the 

Preliminary Results, the Department 

conducted a verification of the cost of 

production responses for Venus Wire 

Industries Pvt. Ltd. and its affiliate, 

Sieves Manufacturers (India) Private 

Limited. The Department intends to 

issue a comprehensive report of the 

results of this verification. Further, the 

Department needs to allow time for 

parties to review this verification report, 

which further delays the briefing 

schedule. Thus, it is not practicable to 

complete this review by July 2, 2011, 

and the Department is extending the 

time limit for completion of the final 

results by an additional 60 days to 

August 31, 2011. 

This notice is published pursuant to 

sections 751(a) and 777(i) of the Act. 

Dated: April 7, 2011. 

Christian Marsh, 

Deputy Assistant Secretary for Antidumping 

and Countervailing Duty Operations. 

[FR Doc. 2011–9115 Filed 4–13–11; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P 

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE 

International Trade Administration 

[A–570–941] 

Certain Kitchen Appliance Shelving 

and Racks From the People’s Republic 

of China: Extension of Time Limits for 

the Preliminary Results of the First 

Antidumping Duty Administrative 

Review 

AGENCY: Import Administration, 

International Trade Administration, 

Department of Commerce. 

DATES: Effective Date: April 14, 2011. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Katie Marksberry or Kabir Archuletta, 

AD/CVD Operations, Office 9, Import 

Administration, International Trade 

Administration, U.S. Department of 

Commerce, 14th Street and Constitution 

Avenue, NW., Washington DC 20230; 

telephone: (202) 482–7906 or (202) 482– 

2593, respectively. 

Background 

On October 28, 2010, the Department 

of Commerce (‘‘Department’’) initiated 

an administrative review of certain 

kitchen appliance shelving and racks 

from the People’s Republic of China 

(‘‘PRC’’) for the period March 5, 2009, 

through August 31, 2010. See Initiation 

of Antidumping and Countervailing 

Duty Administrative Reviews, 75 FR 

66349 (October 28, 2010) (‘‘First 

Initiation’’).1

On January 20, 2011, the Department 

selected two mandatory respondents in 

the above referenced administrative 

review pursuant to section 777A(c)(2)(B) 

of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended 

(‘‘the Act’’): Guangdong Wireking 

Housewares & Hardware Co., Ltd. 

(‘‘Wireking’’) and Jiangsu Weixi Group 

Co. (‘‘Weixi’’).2

The Department sent its antidumping 

duty questionnaire to Weixi and 

Wireking on January 20, 2011.3 In its 

questionnaire, the Department requested 

that the two firms provide a response to 

mstockstill on DSKH9S0YB1PROD with NOTICES

Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 72 / Thursday, April 14, 2011 / Notices 20951 

4See Letter from NKS regarding ‘‘Request for 

Extension of Time to File Voluntary Response and 

Request for Clarification of Reporting of Sales,’’ 

dated February 2, 2011. 

5See Memorandum to the File from Kabir 

Archuletta, International Trade Analyst, Office 9, 

regarding ‘‘Guangdong Wireking Housewares & 

Hardware Co., Ltd. Section A Questionnaire 

Extension Request,’’ dated February 10, 2011. 

6See ‘‘Voluntary Response to Section A by New 

King Shan (Zhuhai) Co., Ltd.,’’ dated February 23, 

2011. 

7See Memorandum to James C. Doyle, Office 

Director, Office 9, through Catherine Bertrand, 

Program Manager, Office 9, from Kabir Archuletta, 

International Trade Analyst, Office 9, 

‘‘Antidumping Review of Certain Kitchen Appliance 

Shelving and Racks from the People’s Republic of 

China: Selection of an Additional Mandatory 

Respondent,’’ dated March 1, 2011. 

8See id. 

9See Letter to NKS from Catherine Bertrand, 

Program Manager, Office 9, ‘‘Kitchen Appliance 

Shelving and Racks from the People’s Republic of 

China,’’ dated March 1, 2011. 

Section A of the Department’s 

questionnaire by February 10, 2011, and 

Sections C and D of the questionnaire by 

February 28, 2011. 

On February 2, 2011, eight days prior 

to the Department’s February 10, 2011, 

deadline for Section A questionnaire 

responses, the Department received a 

request on behalf of New King Shan 

(Zhuhai) Co., Ltd. (‘‘NKS’’), a mandatory 

respondent in the original investigation 

and a separate rate company in this 

review, to be selected as a replacement 

mandatory respondent in the event of a 

non-responsive mandatory respondent 

and for a 28-day extension to submit 

questionnaire responses.4 On February 

4, 2011, Wireking filed a request for an 

extension of the deadline to submit its 

Section A response, which the 

Department extended to February 22, 

2011, for Wireking and any potential 

voluntary respondents.5 The 

Department did not receive an extension 

request from Weixi and did not receive 

its Section A response by the appointed 

deadline. 

On February 23, 2011, the Department 

received an unsolicited Section A 

questionnaire response from NKS.6 On 

March 1, 2011, because Weixi did not 

cooperate with our request for 

information, the Department selected 

NKS, the third largest exporter by 

volume, as a replacement mandatory 

respondent.7 We also determined that it 

was appropriate to use the Section A 

response already submitted by NKS as 

the basis for that company’s response as 

a mandatory respondent.8 On March 1, 

2011, the Department sent its 

antidumping questionnaire to NKS and 

assigned a deadline of March 22, 2011, 

for its Sections C and D responses.9 The 

preliminary results of this review are 

currently due on June 2, 2011. 

Statutory Time Limits 

Section 751(a)(3)(A) of the Act 

requires the Department to issue the 

preliminary results of an administrative 

review within 245 days after the last day 

of the anniversary month of an order for 

which a review is requested. Consistent 

with section 751(a)(3)(A) of the Act, the 

Department may extend the 245-day 

period to 365 days if it is not practicable 

to complete the review within a 245-day 

period. 

Extension of Time Limit of Preliminary 

Results 

The preliminary results are currently 

due on June 2, 2011. The nonresponsiveness of one of the initial 

mandatory respondents, Weixi, and the 

selection of an additional mandatory 

respondent, NKS, restricted the time 

that the Department has available to 

gather and analyze additional 

information related to the sales process, 

affiliations, establishing the proper date 

of sale, surrogate values for all factors of 

production, and the methodology used 

to report factors of production. As the 

Department has yet to receive all 

responses to its supplemental 

questionnaires, we require more time to 

analyze the responses and issue any 

additional supplemental questionnaires, 

as needed. Therefore, we find that it is 

not practicable to complete these 

preliminary results within the current 

245 day deadline. 

Therefore, in accordance with section 

751(a)(3)(A) of the Act, the Department 

is extending the time limit for issuing 

the preliminary results by 120 days 

until September 30, 2011. The final 

results continue to be due 120 days after 

the publication of the preliminary 

results. 

This notice is published pursuant to 

section 777(i)(1) of the Act and 19 CFR 

351.213(h)(2). 

Dated: April 7, 2011. 

Christian Marsh, 

Deputy Assistant Secretary for Antidumping 

and Countervailing Duty Operations. 

[FR Doc. 2011–9114 Filed 4–13–11; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P 

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE 

International Trade Administration 

[A–428–840] 

Lightweight Thermal Paper from 

Germany: Notice of Partial Rescission 

of Antidumping Duty Administrative 

Review 

AGENCY: Import Administration, 

International Trade Administration, 

Department of Commerce. 

DATES: Effective Date: April 14, 2011. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Stephanie Moore or George McMahon, 

AD/CVD Operations, Office 3, Import 

Administration, International Trade 

Administration, U.S. Department of 

Commerce, 14th Street, and 

Constitution Avenue, NW., Washington, 

DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482–3692 or 

(202) 482–1167, respectively. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Background 

On November 1, 2010, the Department 

of Commerce (the Department) 

published in the Federal Register a 

notice of ‘‘Opportunity to Request 

Administrative Review’’ of the 

antidumping duty order on lightweight 

thermal paper (thermal paper) from 

Germany for the period of review (POR) 

November 1, 2009, through October 31, 

2010. See Antidumping or 

Countervailing Duty Order, Finding, or 

Suspended Investigation; Opportunity 

To Request Administrative Review, 75 

FR 67079 (November 1, 2010). 

On November 30, 2010, the 

Department received a timely request 

filed on behalf of Appleton Papers Inc. 

(petitioner) to conduct an administrative 

review of Mitsubishi HiTec Paper 

Flensburg GmbH, Mitsubishi HiTec 

Paper Bielefeld GmbH, and Mitsubishi 

International Corp. (collectively, 

Mitsubishi), and Papierfabrik August 

Koehler AG (Koehler). On November 30, 

2010, the Department also received a 

request filed on behalf of Koehler to 

conduct an administrative review of 

Koehler. 

Pursuant to the aforementioned 

requests, the Department published in 

the Federal Register a notice of 

initiation of an administrative review of 

the antidumping duty order on thermal 

paper from Germany, covering two 

respondents, Mitsubishi and Koehler. 

See Initiation of Antidumping and 

Countervailing Duty Administrative 

Reviews and Request for Revocation in 

Part, 75 FR 81565 (December 28, 2010) 

(Notice of Initiation). 

mstockstill on DSKH9S0YB1PROD with NOTICES