alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### Mary Nielson et al., Appellants, v. H. Nelson Flanagan & Co., Inc., Respondent.

*801No opinion. Johnston, Adel, Taylor and Lewis, JJ., concur; Carswell, J., dissents and votes to reverse the order and to grant the motion, with the following memorandum: I see no question of fact. The definition of “person” in section 37 of the General Construction Law obtains unless the context of the statute construed indicates to the contrary. Here the statute shows the contrary in that it is inherently impossible for a “ corporation ” to be a fellow employee within the meaning of the Workmen’s Compensation Law, especially subdivision 6 of section 29.
§ 6.96 Consumer promotions. ( a ) *Coupons.* The act by an industry member of furnishing to consumers coupons which are redeemable at a retail establishment does not constitute a means to induce within the meaning of section 105(b)(3) of the Act, provided the following conditions are met: ( 1 ) All retailers within the market where the coupon offer is made may redeem such coupons; and
( 2 ) An industry member may not reimburse a retailer for more than the face value of all coupons redeemed, plus a usual and customary handling fee for the redemption of coupons.
( b ) *Direct offerings.* Contest prizes, premium offers, refunds, and like items may be offered by industry members directly to consumers. Officers, employees and representatives of wholesalers or retailers are excluded from particiption.
[T.D. ATF-74, 45 FR 63251, Sept. 23, 1980, as amended by T.D. ATF-364, 60 FR 20423, Apr. 26, 1995]
**Exhibit
      32.1**





**CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO**


**18
      U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**


**AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**


**SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**





In
      connection with the Annual Report of SRKP 2, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-KSB
      for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2007 as filed with the Securities and
      Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Richard A. Rappaport,
      certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of
      the
      Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:





(1)
      The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)
      The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





/s/
                  Richard A. RappaportRichard
                  A. RappaportPrincipal
                  Executive OfficerJuly 30, 2008
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 14-30433

BRIAN M. ALLEN, on behalf of the United States of America and those 

similarly situated,

 Plaintiff - Appellant

v.

ANN KELLER, Judge, in her official capacity and individually; VALERY 

HOWARD; DEPARTMENT OF CHILDREN AND FAMILY SERVICES 

STATE OF LOUISIANA; JEFFERSON PARISH DISTRICT ATTORNEY,

 Defendants - Appellees

Appeals from the United States District Court 

for the Eastern District of Louisiana

USDC No. 2:13-CV-233

Before JOLLY, HIGGINSON and COSTA, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Plaintiff Brian Allen was ordered to pay child support after a paternity 

test determined with 99.99% certainty that he was the biological father of a 

minor child. He failed to do so and as a result was incarcerated multiple times 

in Jefferson Parish, Louisiana. Allen filed suit against the above-named 

* Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not 

be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. 

R. 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

May 11, 2015

Lyle W. Cayce

Clerk

 

 Case: 14-30433 Document: 00513037749 Page: 1 Date Filed: 05/11/2015
No. 14-30433

defendants, asserting a qui tam action under the False Claims Act as well as 

a civil rights action under Title VI and 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The district court 

granted the defendants’ respective motions to dismiss under Rules 12(b)(1) and 

12(b)(6) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. 

This case is now before us on appeal. We have reviewed carefully the 

complaint and incorporated attachments. We have considered the parties’ 

briefs. Finally, we have heard oral argument. We find no reversible error in 

the proceedings before the district court, and, consequently, the judgment of 

the district court is AFFIRMED. See 5th Cir. R. 47.6.

2

 Case: 14-30433 Document: 00513037749 Page: 2 Date Filed: 05/11/2015
EXHIBIT 31.1

      I, Francis O'Donnell, certify that:

      1. I have reviewed  this annual report on Form 10-KSB of Coach  Industries
Group, Inc.;

      2.  Based on my  knowledge,  this  report  does  not  contain  any  untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact  necessary to make
the statements made, in light of the  circumstances  under which such statements
were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

      3. Based on my knowledge,  the financial  statements,  and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the
financial  condition,  results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as
of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

      4. The registrant's other certifying  officer(s) and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining  disclosure  controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

            (a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
      disclosure  controls and procedures to be designed under our  supervision,
      to ensure that material information relating to the registrant,  including
      its consolidated subsidiaries,  is made known to us by others within those
      entities,  particularly  during the  period in which this  report is being
      prepared;

            (b)  Evaluated  the  effectiveness  of the  registrant's  disclosure
      controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about
      the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end
      of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

            (c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal
      control over  financial  reporting that occurred  during the  registrant's
      most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant's  fourth fiscal quarter in the
      case of an annual report) that has materially  affected,  or is reasonably
      likely to  materially  affect,  the  registrant's  internal  control  over
      financial reporting; and

      5. The  registrant's  other  certifying  officer(s) and I have  disclosed,
based  on  our  most  recent  evaluation  of  internal  control  over  financial
reporting,   to  the  registrant's  auditor  and  the  audit  committee  of  the
registrant's   board  of  directors  (or  persons   performing   the  equivalent
functions):

            (a) All  significant  deficiencies  and material  weaknesses  in the
      design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are
      reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant's  ability to record,
      process, summarize and report financial information; and

            (b) Any fraud, whether or not material,  that involves management or
      other employees who have a significant role in the  registrant's  internal
      control over financial reporting.


Dated:  March 25, 2004


         /s/ Francis O'Donnell
         ------------------------------------------
         Francis O'Donnell, Chief Executive Officer
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 04-50427 Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus EDUARDO GARCIA, Defendant-Appellant.

-------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas USDC No. 3:03-CR-2326-ALL-PRM

-------------------- Before KING, Chief Judge, and DeMOSS and CLEMENT, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: *Eduardo Garcia appeals his sentence following his guiltyplea conviction of importation of a controlled substance and possession with intent to distribute a controlled substance. Garcia argues that the district court clearly erred by failing to award him a two-level reduction under U.S.S.G. § 3B1.2(b) for having a minor role in the offense. He argues that he was merely a drug courier who was to be paid a small fee for driving a car containing marihuana across the border from Mexico into the United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit 

## F I L E D December 16, 2004 Charles R. Fulbruge III ClerkNo. 04-50427 -2- United States. He contends that other participants in the offense were more culpable. Garcia admitted to contacting the man who hired him as a courier, as well as to accompanying this man to purchase the vehicle in which the drugs were hidden. Garcia knew that the vehicle contained drugs and that he was to deliver the vehicle to an individual in the United States and was to be paid for his efforts. The district court did not clearly err by denying Garcia an adjustment for playing a minor role in the offense.
See United States v. Gallegos , 868 F.2d 711, 713 (5th Cir. 1989); United States v. Buenrostro , 868 F.2d 135, 137-38 (5th Cir. 1989).
AFFIRMED.
```

[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 185 (Friday, September 23, 2011)]
[Notices]
[Pages 59118-59119]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2011-24655]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

 COMMODITY FUTURES TRADING COMMISSION

 Sunshine Act Meetings

AGENCY HOLDING THE MEETING: Commodity Futures Trading Commission.

TIME AND DATE: 10 a.m., Friday, October 14, 2011.

PLACE: 1155 21st St., NW., Washington, DC, 9th Floor Commission 
Conference Room.

STATUS: Closed.

Matters To Be Considered

    Surveillance and Enforcement Matters. In the event that the times 
or dates of these or any future meetings change, an announcement of the 
change, along with the new time and place of the meeting will be posted 
on the Commission's Web site at http://www.cftc.gov.

[[Page 59119]]

CONTACT PERSON FOR MORE INFORMATION: Sauntia S. Warfield, 202-418-5084.

Sauntia S. Warfield,
Assistant Secretary of the Commission.
[FR Doc. 2011-24655 Filed 9-21-11; 4:15 pm]
BILLING CODE 6351-01-P
```
#### § 1.5 When was the former Bureau of Employees' Compensation abolished?

By Secretary of Labor's Order issued September 23, 1974 (39 FR 34723), issued concurrently with Employment Standards Order 2-74 (39 FR 34722), the Secretary revoked the prior Secretary's Order No. 18-67 (32 FR 12979), which had delegated authority and assigned responsibility for the various workers' compensation programs enumerated in § 1.2, except the Black Lung Benefits Program and the Energy Employees Occupational Illness Compensation Program not then in existence, to the Director of the former Bureau of Employees' Compensation.
#### Guy M. De Mauriac v. Ophelia A. Byrnes.

Motion granted, unless appellant complies with terms' stated in order. Present — Ingraham, P. J., McLaughlin, Laughlin, Clarke and Scott, JJ.
UNITEDSTATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGECOMMISSION

Washington,D.C. 20549

 

Form 10-Q

 

(Mark One)

[X]   QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TOSECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

 

For thequarterly period ended September 30, 2008

 

[ ]   TRANSITIONREPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF1934

 

For thetransition period from _________to _________

 

Commission File Number0-13465

 

NATIONAL HOUSING PARTNERSHIPREALTY FUND I

 (Exact name ofregistrant as specified in its charter)

 

 

 

 

Indicate by check markwhether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file suchreports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90days.  

[X] Yes  [ ]No

 

Indicate by check markwhether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, anon-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company.  See the definitionsof “large accelerated filer”, “accelerated filer” and “smaller reportingcompany” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.

 

 

Indicate by check markwhether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of theExchange Act).  Yes ___ No _X_
#### Joseph Mook et al., Copartners under the Name of Mook Brothers, Appellants, v. Endurette Corporation of America, Respondent. Endurette Corporation of America, Claimant, Respondent.

Mo opinion. Present — Martin, P. J., Townley, Untermyer, Cohn and Callahan, JJ.; Martin, P. J., and Townley, J., dissent and vote to affirm. Settle order on notice.
| 1. | This                Periodic Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a)                or                15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d));                and |
|----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| 2. | The                information contained in the Periodic Report fairly presents, in                all                material respects, the financial condition and results of operations                of                the Company. |
|----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| Date:                November 14, 2008 | By: |  /s/                James L. Mandel*Chief                Executive Officer* |
|----------------------------------------|-----|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| 1. | This                Periodic Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a)                or                15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d));                and |
|----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| 2. | The                information contained in the Periodic Report fairly presents, in                all                material respects, the financial condition and results of operations                of                the Company. |
|----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| Date:                November 14, 2008 | By: |  /s/                Steven M. Bell*Chief                Financial Officer* |
|----------------------------------------|-----|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

----
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY HIGH

 26,956

 24,667

 22,799

 22,870

 14,575

 11,428

 22,906

 22,875

 25,556

 18,397

 21,267

 21,087

 20,504

 18,684

 17,286

 15,432

 19,315

 20,467

 18,719

 17,245

 17,244

 15,741

 9,650

 4,713

 5,545

 3,415

 4,264

 2,797

 1,969

 988

 712

 13,984

 13,852

 13,960

 10,150

 7,389

 7,309

 13,038

 13,351

 13,448

 7,002

 9,101

 7,672

 7,502

 6,907

 7,459

 8,634

 8,809

 7,452

 8,656

 8,250

 8,762

 5,039

 1,711

 856

 706

 559

 507

 445

 440

 421

 407

 20,293

 19,511

 18,844

 17,234

 10,061

 9,500

 16,992

 16,820

 17,435

 10,611

 11,738

 13,554

 12,983

 12,110

 10,907

 10,943

 14,060

 12,644

 11,733

 13,001

 12,357

 9,179

 4,634

 2,237

 1,964

 1,664

 1,690

 1,025

 795

 614

 517

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

JANUARY 2010 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: February 2, 2010

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

PORT CHICAGO TOP IN SUISUN BAY
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

DAY

 13,635

 13,853

 13,989

 14,265

 14,542

 14,962

 15,205

 15,608

 15,927

 16,365

 16,869

 17,251

 17,616

 17,968

 18,511

 18,889

 19,399

 20,259

 21,322

 23,012

 25,251

 27,736

 30,402

 33,105

 35,289

 38,957

 42,899

 44,971

 46,998

 49,411

 45,269

 45,675

 46,261

 46,882

 47,232

 47,292

 47,533

 47,582

 47,824

 48,045

 28,271

 48,509

 48,796

 48,969

 49,007

 49,379

 49,803

 50,004

 50,272

 50,677

 51,121

 51,674

 52,183

 53,798

 53,253

 54,678

 55,371

 55,573

 55,719

 55,929

STORAGE - A.F. 

 58,904

 59,528

 60,250

 61,147

 61,774

 62,254

 62,738

 63,190

 63,751

 64,410

 45,140

 65,760

 66,412

 66,937

 67,518

 68,268

 69,202

 70,263

 71,594

 73,689

 76,372

 79,410

 82,585

 86,903

 88,542

 93,635

 98,270

 100,544

 102,717

 105,340

1,448

1,203

1,462

1,064

1,079

1,165

1,099

816

1,001

875

1,211

1,250

2,288

1,455

1,274

1,294

1,351

1,625

1,616

1,832

2,126

1,980

1,749

2,275

1,944

3,364

3,022

2,009

2,048

1,632

1,798

1,518

1,826

1,516

1,395

1,407

1,343

1,044

1,284

1,207

-8,504

11,646

2,617

1,720

1,567

1,672

1,822

2,160

2,287

2,888

3,479

3,512

3,350

4,452

2,770

5,932

5,359

3,155

3,144

2,954

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

APRIL 2012 FULL NATURAL FLOW AT NEW MELONES DAM RUN DATE: 08/02/2012

TOTALS +47,130 72,320

* October 1, 143,447

 238.5

 241.5

 245.1

 248.1

 250.9

 253.7

 256.3

 258.4

 260.9

 263.3

 246.5

 269.6

 274.8

 278.2

 281.3

 284.6

 288.2

 292.5

 297.0

 302.8

 309.7

 316.6

 323.3

 332.1

 337.6

 349.4

 360.0

 366.2

 372.5

 378.3

DONNELLS

RES

BEARDSLEY

RES

2011 TO DATE

NEW

MELONES

INFLOW

C.F.S

NATURAL

RIVER

C.F.S

ACCUM *

FULL

NATURAL

1000 A.F.

RESERVOIR

TOTAL

+694

+624

+722

+897

+627

+480

+484

+452

+561

+659

-19,270

+20,620

+652

+525

+581

+750

+934

+1,061

+1,331

+2,095

+2,683

+3,038

+3,175

+4,318

+1,639

+5,093

+4,635

+2,274

+2,173

+2,623

CHANGE

A.F. C.F.S.

+350

+315

+364

+452

+316

+242

+244

+228

+283

+332

-9,715

+10,396

+329

+265

+293

+378

+471

+535

+671

+1,056

+1,353

+1,532

+1,601

+2,177

+826

+2,568

+2,337

+1,146

+1,096

+1,322
Exhibit 21


                         Subsidiaries of the Registrant

                                                               Jurisdiction of
Name                                                            Organization
----                                                            ------------

Progress Bank....................................................United States
     Progress Holdings, Inc......................................Pennsylvania
         Progress Leasing Company................................Maryland
     PBIC, Inc...................................................Delaware
     Pilot Financial Corporation.................................Pennsylvania
     Progress Sentry Corporation.................................Pennsylvania
KMR Management, Inc..............................................Pennsylvania
Progress Capital, Inc............................................Delaware
Progress Capital II, Inc.........................................Delaware
Progress Realty Advisors, Inc....................................Pennsylvania
Procall Teleservices, Inc........................................Pennsylvania
Progress Capital Management, Inc.................................Pennsylvania
Progress Development Corporation.................................Pennsylvania
Progress Financial Resources, Inc................................Delaware
**CERTIFICATIONS**
Exhibit 31.1
I, S. W. Yong, certify that:
1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Trio-TechInternational, a California corporation;
2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement ofa material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make thestatements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements weremade, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;
3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financialinformation included in this report, fairly present in all material respectsthe financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrantas of, and for, the periods presented in this report;
4. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible forestablishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined inExchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:
     (a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused suchdisclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, toensure that material information relating to the registrant, including itsconsolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities,particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;
     (b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controlsand procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about theeffectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of theperiod covered by this report based on such evaluation; and
     (c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internalcontrol over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s mostrecent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of anannual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely tomaterially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting;and
5. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based onour most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to theregistrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board ofdirectors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):
     (a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design oroperation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonablylikely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process,summarize and report financial information; and
     (b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or otheremployees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting.
Dated: November 12, 2004                                          /s/ S. W. YONG   S. W. Yong,   President and Chief Executive Officer