alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY ELEV

 514.55

 513.52

 512.18

 511.08

 510.11

 509.12

 508.34

 507.96

 507.58

 506.99

 506.07

 505.26

 504.55

 503.87

 503.97

 504.04

 504.01

 504.17

 503.95

 503.93

 503.95

 503.66

 503.22

 502.73

 502.48

 501.70

 501.26

 501.22

 500.93

 500.49

 499.81

 261.0

 257.6

 253.3

 249.7

 246.6

 243.5

 241.0

 239.8

 238.6

 236.8

 233.9

 231.5

 229.3

 227.2

 227.5

 227.7

 227.6

 228.1

 227.5

 227.4

 227.5

 226.6

 225.2

 223.8

 223.0

 220.7

 219.4

 219.3

 218.4

 217.1

 215.1

STORAGE

-2.6

-3.4

-4.4

-3.5

-3.1

-3.1

-2.5

-1.2

-1.2

-1.8

-2.9

-2.5

-2.2

-2.1

+0.3

+0.2

-0.1

+0.5

-0.7

-0.1

+0.1

-0.9

-1.3

-1.5

-0.8

-2.3

-1.3

-0.1

-0.9

-1.3

-2.0

CHANGE

1,598

1,459

1,303

1,711

1,792

1,601

1,636

1,655

1,682

1,677

1,390

1,622

1,599

1,228

1,783

1,577

1,891

2,412

1,936

2,250

1,990

1,044

861

1,191

1,731

1,010

1,395

1,658

957

724

691

INFLOW

 787

 768

 770

 699

 531

 498

 431

 242

 151

 126

 121

 100

 89

 91

 89

 89

 118

 118

 153

 175

 170

 168

 149

 152

 139

 114

 116

 129

 131

 0

 0

MADERA

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

SPILL

 1,663

 1,908

 2,246

 2,319

 2,335

 2,245

 1,996

 1,565

 1,671

 2,023

 2,256

 2,306

 2,148

 1,705

 1,070

 904

 1,343

 1,575

 1,651

 1,638

 1,328

 861

 915

 1,319

 1,510

 1,618

 1,482

 1,128

 802

 923

 1,245

FRIANT-KERN

 38

 44

 41

 37

 44

 20

 34

 35

 44

 43

 35

 49

 23

 44

 38

 44

 43

 40

 37

 35

 28

 24

 35

 30

 33

 30

 33

 37

 35

 31

 32

C.F.S.

 .36

 .42

 .39

 .36

 .43

 .20

 .33

 .35

 .44

 .43

 .35

 .49

 .23

 .45

 .39

 .45

 .44

 .41

 .38

 .36

 .28

 .24

 .36

 .31

 .34

 .31

 .34

 .38

 .36

 .32

 .34

INCHES

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

PRECIP

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

AUGUST 2020 MILLERTON LAKE DAILY OPERATIONS RUN DATE: September 1, 2020

IN LAKE

EVAPORATION

INCHES

C.F.S.

COMPUTED*

1000 ACRE-FEET

RELEASE - C.F.S. 

TOTALS -48.6 47,054 7,414 49,698 0 1,116 11.24 .00

ACRE-FEET -48,579 93,332 14,706 98,576 0 2,214

COMMENTS:

* COMPUTED INFLOW IS THE SUM OF CHANGE IN STORAGE, RELEASES, PUMPING AND EVAPORATION.

SUMMARY

RELEASE (ACRE-FEET)

CANALS

FRIANT-KERN

MADERA

 98,576

 14,706 139,702

PRECIPITATION

THIS MONTH =

JULY 1, 2020 TO DATE = 0.00

 263.7

 26,420 0.00

CANALS

AT FRIANT

TOTAL RELEASES

OUTLET

 444

 444

 444

 443

 445

 425

 416

 416

 415

 415

 416

 424

 435

 433

 433

 433

 433

 433

 433

 433

 433

 434

 434

 434

 428

 424

 424

 424

 424

 424

 424

RIVER

 13,320

 26,420

RIVER

OCT 1, 2019 TO DATE = 8.84
Exhibit 99.1
 (SHAW LOGO)
    
    News Release
FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE
 Media and Financial
Contact:    gentry.brann@shawgrp.com
 Shaw Closes $1.45 Billion Unsecured, 5-Year Credit Facility
 BATON ROUGE, La., June 16, 2011
   www.shawgrp.com
 www.shawgrp.com
#### § 72.32 Interest claimed.

Any person claiming an interest in property, including carriers, seized by alcohol, tobacco and firearms officers as subject to administrative forfeiture may file a petition addressed to the Director, for remission or mitigation of the forfeiture of such property.
#### Laura S. Forbes, appellee, v. Edward F. Morearty et al. appellants.

Filed April 8, 1898.

No. 8006.

1. Review: Failure to File Transcript. The filing of a transcript of a judgment in the supreme court later than one year after its •rendition confers no jurisdiction to enter a judgment in said appellate court.

2.-: Transcript. The supreme cpurt has no jurisdiction to re- • view an order not embodied.in.a transcript certified by the clerk of the district court.

Appeal from the district court of Douglas county.

Heard below before Walton, J.

*Appeal dismissed.*

*506*Edward F. Morearty*and *Albert Swartzlander,*for appellants.

*Wright & Thomas, contra.*

Ryan, C.

In the record in this case we find the pleadings, a decree of foreclosure, and a supersedeas bond, but nothing else purporting to be a part of a transcript of the proceedings in the district court of Douglas county. There is likewise a bill of exceptions in which there are embodied a motion for an order for a writ of assistance, an affidavit in support of said motion, and certain orders made with respect to said motion. There is no certificat of the clerk of the district court identifying such motion and orders as a part of the record of the proceedings of said court. In appellant’s brief complaint is made of the order granting a writ of assistance and of no other order or judgment.

It is required in effect, by the provisions of section 675, Code of Civil Procedure, that to perfect his appeal a party appealing from a final order shall, *inter alia,*procure from the clerk of the district court and file in the office of the clerk of the supreme court a certified transcript of the proceedings had in the district court. In *Moore v. Waterman,*40 Neb. 498, a compliance with the above requirement was held essential to confer jurisdiction upon this court. (See also *Hoagland v. Van Etlen,*23 Neb. 462; *Omaha Loan & Trust Co. v. Ayer,*38 Neb. 891; *Record v. Butters,*42 Neb. 786; *School District v. Cooper,*44 Neb. 714; *Martin v. Fillmore County,*44 Neb. 719; *McDonald v. Grabovo,*46 Neb. 406; *Otis v. Butters,*46 Neb. 492; *Felket v. Gooding,*47 Neb. 38; *Romberg v. Fokken,*47 Neb. 198; *Union P. R. Co. v. Kinney,*47 Neb. 393.) The decree in this case was entered in the district court November 28, 1893, and a transcript thereof was not filed in this court until September 21, 1895. This court is, therefore, without *507jurisdiction to enter a judgment on this branch of the case, and this appeal is accordingly

Dismissed.
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 4.12

30 November 2001


PB Holdings NV
1170 Brussels
Terhulpsesteenweg 166

Dear Sirs

This letter is intended to evidence the agreement of the parties to the
Co-ordination Agreement between Pacific Dunlop Limited (PDL), PB Holdings NV and
various of their respective subsidiaries dated on or about 30 November 2001
(Co-ordination Agreement), to amend clause 5.3 of the following Shares
Agreements (as that term and the following terms are defined in the
Co-ordination Agreement):

..  Shares Agreement Australia;

..  Shares Agreement USA; and

..  Novare Shares Agreement.

Clause 5.3 of the Shares Agreements specified above is deleted and replaced by
the following clause:

     "The parties agree that as soon as practicable after Completion, they will
     take such steps as necessary to procure that any Inter Company Debt owing
     to or by the Company is extinguished including but not limited to those
     Inter Company Debts listed in schedule 12. Each party will on request
     provide to the other evidence of such extinguishment.

     For the avoidance of doubt, nothing in this clause 5.3 will require:

     (a)  any party or its Related Corporations to pay any money; or

     (b)  require any adjustment to the Purchase Price."

By signing the attached copy of this letter, PDL and PB Holdings NV agree to be
bound by the terms of this letter and to procure its related corporations to do
everything necessary to give effect to its terms.

Yours sincerely

/s/ Paul Devereux

Paul Devereux

Pacific Dunlop Limited

<PAGE>

Signed for and on behalf of
Pacific Dunlop Limited
by its attorney:

/s/ Paul Devereux                            /s/ Carly Mansell
-----------------------------------          -----------------------------------
Witness                                      Attorney

Paul Devereux
-----------------------------------
Name (please print)


Signed for and on behalf of
PB Holdings NV
by its attornies:

/s/                                          /s/
-----------------------------------          -----------------------------------
Witness                                      Attorney


-----------------------------------
Name (please print)

/s/                                          /s/
-----------------------------------          -----------------------------------
Witness                                      Attorney


-----------------------------------
Name (please print)
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 97-1568

RICHARD HAEFNER, Dr.,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

COUNTY OF LANCASTER, PA,

Defendant - Appellee,

versus

WILLIS J. DIZE, Chief of Police of the Chincoteague Police Department; EDWARD LEWIS,

Captain of the Chincoteague Police Department,

Movants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Norfolk. William T. Prince, Magistrate Judge.

(CA-95-41-2)

Submitted: June 19, 1997 Decided: June 27, 1997

Before WILKINS and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior

Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
2

Richard Haefner, Appellant Pro Se. Frank Neil Cowan, COWAN & OWEN,

P.C., Richmond, Virginia, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).

PER CURIAM:

Appellant appeals a magistrate judge's notation order declining to file his motion to vacate and re-enter judgment pursuant

to Fed. R. Civ. P. 60(b) for lack of jurisdiction. Because Haefner

had previously filed a notice of appeal to this Court of the underlying order, the magistrate judge was divested of jurisdiction to

consider any subsequent motion to amend or vacate the appealed

order. See Lewis v. Tobacco Workers' Int'l Union, 577 F.2d 1135,

1139 (4th Cir. 1978). Accordingly, we affirm the magistrate judge's

order. We deny Appellees' motion to dismiss this appeal as untimely. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the

court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Stephen J. Markman, Chief Justice

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano 

Richard H. Bernstein

Kurtis T. Wilder

Elizabeth T. Clement, Justices

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

 November 29, 2017

a1120

Order 

Clerk

November 29, 2017

155140

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

v SC: 155140

COA: 334996

Grand Traverse CC: 

JARED ALLAN BLAHA, 13-011558-FC

Defendant-Appellant.

_________________________________________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the December 2, 2016 

order of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because the defendant has 

failed to meet the burden of establishing entitlement to relief under MCR 6.508(D).

CLEMENT, J., did not participate.
**EXHIBIT12(b)**

**COMPUTATIONOF RATIO OF EARNINGS TO FIXED CHARGES**

**PURSUANTTO THE SUPPORT AGREEMENTBETWEEN THE COMPANY AND PACCAR**

#### (Millions of Dollars)

| ** **                         | ** ** | **Three Months Ended** | ** ** |
|------------------------------------|------------|----------------------------------|------------|
| ** **                         | ** ** | **March 31**                | ** ** |
| ** **                         | ** ** | **2007**                         | ** ** | **2006** | ** ** |
| FIXED CHARGES                      |       |                             |       |   |   |
| Interest expense                   | ** ** | **$**                            | **49.1**   |   | $ | 34.6 |   |
| Facility and equipment  rental     | ** ** | **.5**                           |       | .5 |   |
|                               | ** ** | ** **                       |       |   |   |
| TOTAL FIXED CHARGES                | ** ** | **$**                            | **49.6**   |   | $ | 35.1 |   |
|                               | ** ** | ** **                       |       |   |   |
| EARNINGS                           |       |                             |       |   |   |
| Income before taxes                | ** ** | **$**                            | **33.1**   |   | $ | 32.1 |   |
| Depreciation                       | ** ** | **22.0**                         |       | 19.0 |   |
| ** **                         |       | **55.1**                         |       | 51.1 |   |
|                               |       |                             |       |   |   |
| Fixed charges                      | ** ** | **49.6**                         |       | 35.1 |   |
|                               | ** ** | ** **                       |       |   |   |
| EARNINGS AS DEFINED                | ** ** | **$**                            | **104.7**  |   | $ | 86.2 |   |
|                               | ** ** | ** **                       |       |   |   |
| RATIO OF EARNINGS TO FIXED CHARGES | ** ** | **2.11X**                        |       | 2.46X |   |

 

----
§ 367.52 How does the Secretary reallot funds under this program? ( a ) From the amounts specified in paragraph (b) of this section, the Secretary may make reallotment grants to States, as determined by the Secretary, whose population of older individuals who are blind has a substantial need for the services specified in section 752(d) of the Act and § 367.3(b), relative to the populations in other States of older individuals who are blind.
( b ) The amounts referred to in paragraph (a) of this section are any amounts that are not paid to States under section 752(c)(2) of the Act and § 367.51 as a result of— ( 1 ) The failure of a DSA to prepare, submit, and receive approval of an application under section 752(h) of the Act and in accordance with §§ 367.30 and 367.31; or
( 2 ) Information received by the Secretary from the DSA that the DSA does not intend to expend the full amount of the State's allotment under section 752(c) of the Act and this subpart.
( c ) A reallotment grant to a State under paragraph (a) of this section is subject to the same conditions as grants made under section 752(a) of the Act and this part.
( d ) Any funds made available to a State for any fiscal year pursuant to this section are regarded as an increase in the allotment of the State under § 367.51 for that fiscal year only.
( e ) A State that does not intend to expend the full amount of its allotment must notify RSA at least 45 days prior to the end of the fiscal year that its grant, or a portion of it, is available for reallotment.
(Approved by the Office of Management and Budget under control number 1820-0660) (Authority: Section 752(i)(4) of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as amended; 29 U.S.C. 796k(i)(4))
(No. 5859

#### Garfield Park Moving and Storage Company, Claimant, *vs.*State of Illinois, Department of Public Aid, Respondent.

*Opinion filed August 3, 1972.*

Garfield Park Moving and Storage Company, Claimant, pro se.

William J. Scott, Attorney General; Edward L. S. Arkema, Jr., Assistant Attorney, for Respondent.

Perlin, C.J.
Exhibit 99.12




                       GE CAPITAL MORTGAGE SERVICES, INC.
            OFFICERS' ANNUAL COMPLIANCE CERTIFICATE - SERIES 1998-10A


         The undersigned,  Vice Presidents of GE Capital Mortgage Services, Inc.
(the "Servicer"), pursuant to the Pooling and Servicing Agreement for the Series
1998-10A REMIC Multi-Class Mortgage Pass-Through  Certificates (the "Agreement")
entered into by GE Capital Mortgage Services,  Inc., as Seller and Servicer, and
State Street Bank and Trust Company,  as Trustee,  which  Agreement  requires an
annual  statement of  compliance  to be made to the Trustee by an officer of the
Servicer, hereby state that:

         (i)      a  review  of  the  activities  of  the  Servicer  during  the
                  preceding  calendar  year  and of its  performance  under  the
                  Agreement  has  been  made  under  the  undersigned  officers'
                  supervision; and

         (ii)     to the best of the undersigned  officers' knowledge,  based on
                  such review,  the Servicer has  fulfilled  all of its material
                  obligations  under the Agreement  throughout such year, except
                  as set forth on Exhibit A hereto.

Capitalized  terms used  herein but not  defined  herein  shall have the meaning
given to them in the Agreement.


Dated:            March 24, 1999




By:/s/ Gregory A. Gibson      
------------------------------
         Gregory A. Gibson
         Vice President


By:/s/ Tim Neer               
------------------------------
         Tim Neer
         Vice President



<PAGE>



                                    EXHIBIT A





                                      None
Exhibit 99.1
 
 Media& Analysts:
    
    Derick Smith(713) 627-4963Date:
    
    July 1, 2011
 Spectra Energy Partners Completes Acquisition of the Big Sandy Pipeline
<PAGE>

                                   EXHIBIT 32

                               CCFNB BANCORP, INC.

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

     In connection with this Quarterly Report of CCFNB Bancorp, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2006, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Lance
O. Diehl, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, and I, Virginia D. Kocher, the
Principal Financial Officer of the Company, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, certify
that:

     1.   this report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     2.   the information contained in this report fairly represents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of
          the Company.

Date: May 10, 2006


                                        /s/ Lance O. Diehl
                                        ----------------------------------------
                                        Lance O. Diehl
                                        Chief Executive Officer


Date: May 10, 2006


                                        /s/ Virginia D. Kocher
                                        ----------------------------------------
                                        Virginia D. Kocher
                                        Principal Financial Officer


                                       29
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY HIGH

 924

 884

 846

 851

 851

 861

 860

 853

 840

 831

 820

 825

 842

 865

 880

 866

 848

 855

 859

 873

 869

 869

 864

 865

 856

 841

 817

 755

 767

 763

 749

 798

 798

 760

 774

 717

 727

 738

 723

 704

 724

 725

 717

 614

 700

 755

 758

 755

 758

 759

 763

 762

 771

 766

 771

 725

 737

 667

 528

 702

 688

 604

 842

 832

 804

 797

 774

 770

 769

 757

 752

 758

 758

 757

 763

 789

 802

 799

 784

 788

 792

 796

 803

 803

 799

 796

 781

 762

 739

 714

 720

 717

 704

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

JULY 2014 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: August 8, 2014

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

HOLLAND TRACT ON OLD RIVER
§ 10.725 When is a Federal grand or petit juror covered under the FECA? ( a ) Federal grand and petit jurors are covered under the FECA when they are in performance of duty as a juror, which includes that time when a juror is: ( 1 ) In attendance at court pursuant to a summons;
( 2 ) In deliberation;
( 3 ) Sequestered by order of a judge; or
( 4 ) At a site, by order of the court, for the taking of a view.
( b ) A juror is not considered to be in the performance of duty while traveling to or from home in connection with the activities enumerated in paragraphs (a) (1) through (4) of this section.
Day

Elev

Feet Storage Change

Federal

Pump

Federal

Gen

Pacheco

Pump ADJ

Federal

Change

Federal

Storage

922,571

1 490.59 1,401,047 4,027 2,426 0 32 0 2,637 925,208

2 491.16 1,407,431 6,384 2,431 0 0 0 2,312 927,520

3 491.74 1,413,936 6,505 2,398 0 0 0 2,452 929,972

4 492.52 1,422,702 8,766 2,374 0 0 0 2,258 932,230

5 493.25 1,430,921 8,219 2,379 0 0 0 925 933,155

6 494.10 1,440,512 9,591 4,698 0 0 0 4,531 937,686

7 495.01 1,450,805 10,293 4,696 0 0 0 4,454 942,140

8 495.95 1,461,462 10,657 4,723 0 0 0 4,509 946,649

9 496.80 1,471,122 9,660 4,687 0 0 0 4,501 951,150

10 497.50 1,479,093 7,971 4,748 0 0 0 4,552 955,702

11 497.86 1,483,198 4,105 4,658 0 0 0 4,515 960,217

12 498.03 1,485,138 1,940 1,343 0 0 0 1,931 962,148

13 498.15 1,486,508 1,370 1,315 0 0 0 1,154 963,302

14 498.11 1,486,051 -457 0 0 1 0 -65 963,237

15 498.14 1,486,394 343 0 0 1 0 -129 963,108

16 498.08 1,485,709 -685 0 0 6 0 -92 963,016

17 497.97 1,484,453 -1,256 1,348 0 0 0 1,213 964,229

18 497.90 1,483,655 -798 1,167 0 5 0 1,161 965,390

19 497.96 1,484,339 684 0 0 4 0 -108 965,282

20 498.13 1,486,280 1,941 1,312 0 5 0 1,293 966,575

21 498.05 1,485,366 -914 1,296 0 3 0 1,258 967,833

22 497.74 1,481,829 -3,537 0 1,127 7 0 -1,368 966,465

23 497.51 1,479,207 -2,622 0 1,138 0 0 -976 965,489

24 497.30 1,476,814 -2,393 0 0 0 0 -21 965,468

25 497.10 1,474,536 -2,278 0 0 0 0 -62 965,406

26 497.22 1,475,903 1,367 0 1,135 0 0 -1,171 964,235

27 497.39 1,477,839 1,936 0 1,264 0 0 -1,517 962,718

28 497.63 1,480,575 2,736 0 0 0 0 -168 962,550

29 497.69 1,481,259 684 0 0 0 0 -12 962,538

30 497.96 1,484,339 3,080 0 0 0 0 383 962,921

31 498.04 1,485,252 913 0 0 204 0 -150 962,771

Totals 88,232 47,999 4,664 268 0 40,200

COMMENTS: Values in Acre-Feet

Historical Archive and Report Database

San Luis Reservoir Federal Daily Operations 

Run Date: 5/21/2024

March 2024