alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

DAY ELEV

 223.26

 222.40

 220.40

 221.12

 222.27

 222.30

 222.75

 223.03

 220.81

 220.83

 221.44

 222.17

 221.40

 220.31

 219.87

 218.39

 218.78

 218.93

 219.29

 218.96

 219.67

 219.70

 218.32

 218.70

 218.12

 218.73

 218.58

 219.04

 220.13

 220.24

 51,741

 49,447

 44,192

 46,075

 49,102

 49,182

 50,379

 51,126

 45,263

 45,315

 46,915

 48,836

 46,810

 43,957

 42,815

 39,045

 40,027

 40,407

 41,323

 40,483

 42,299

 42,376

 38,870

 39,825

 38,370

 39,901

 39,523

 40,686

 43,489

 43,775

STORAGE

+7,836

-2,294

-5,255

+1,883

+3,027

+80

+1,197

+747

-5,863

+52

+1,600

+1,921

-2,026

-2,853

-1,142

-3,770

+982

+380

+916

-840

+1,816

+77

-3,506

+955

-1,455

+1,531

-378

+1,163

+2,803

+286

CHANGE

2,016

2,165

2,166

2,080

2,104

2,017

1,952

1,984

1,964

1,864

2,049

2,053

1,813

1,330

987

1,041

997

1,155

1,306

1,255

1,218

1,155

1,161

1,200

1,294

1,117

764

1,116

1,537

1,650

PUMPING

 4,025

 3,291

 3,975

 4,036

 3,633

 3,595

 3,342

 3,618

 3,080

 3,159

 3,155

 3,149

 3,052

 3,133

 3,506

 3,355

 3,188

 3,049

 3,559

 3,176

 2,849

 3,448

 4,135

 2,454

 3,325

 3,131

 3,580

 3,414

 2,265

 2,594

PUMPING

 2,002

 2,190

 3,288

 1,643

 1,643

 2,005

 1,640

 1,641

 4,363

 1,635

 2,263

 1,635

 2,991

 2,712

 1,356

 3,332

 1,170

 1,260

 810

 1,440

 630

 720

 2,340

 1,168

 896

 1,704

 2,339

 0

 1,524

 2,660

PUMPING

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

GEN.

*

-23

-131

+271

+410

+266

+250

+177

+6

-68

-26

+33

+53

+119

+31

+31

-20

+53

-63

-8

+29

+49

+98

+23

+21

+120

-34

+578

-221

+96

+514

OR

UNITED STATES 

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION

CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT

CONSOLIDATED STATE-FEDERAL O'NEILL FOREBAY October 26, 2001

DAILY OPERATIONS

SEPTEMBER 2001 RUN DATE:

IN LAKE GEN.

ACRE-FEET O'NEILL

RELEASE - C.F.S. 

TOTALS -130 46,510 0 55,000 99,271 +2,634

ACRE-FEET -130 92,253 0 109,093 196,904

SUMMARY

 680

RELEASE (ACRE-FEET)

O'NEILL GEN. 0

SAN LUIS PUMP 109,093 680

 43,905

DOS AMIGOS PUMP 196,904

DELIVERIES 

S. LUIS O'NEILL

 5,657

 0

 0

 1,185

 1,705

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 1,009

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 1,756

 0

 0

 0

 0

 11,312

 22,437

CALIF. DOS AMIGOS

AQUEDUCT

2,328

2,290

2,177

2,953

2,726

3,374

3,456

3,647

2,592

2,982

3,132

3,647

3,089

3,046

3,268

3,766

3,803

3,409

3,533

2,908

3,128

2,954

3,524

2,882

2,074

2,767

4,386

3,106

3,568

3,577

 94,092

 186,631

S. LUIS

DELIV.

GAINS(+)

LOSS(-)

C.F.S.

INFLOW - C.F.S

STATE OF CALIFORNIA

THE RESOURCES AGENCY

DEPARTMENT OF WATER RESOURCES

STATE WATER PROJECT

TOTAL 306,677

 5,225

* DAILY DEL. FIGURES UNAVAILABLE. TOT. DEL. IS INCLUDED IN COMPUTING MONTHLY TOTALS 

Table 18
1 The Honorable Charles A. Shaw, UnitedStates District Judge for the Eastern

District of Missouri. 

## United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________ No. 00-3796

___________ Louis Williams, * * Appellant, * * v. * Appeal from the United States * District Court for the United States of America, * Eastern District of Missouri. * Appellee. * [UNPUBLISHED]

___________ Submitted: December 7, 2000 Filed: December 20, 2000

___________ Before RICHARD S. ARNOLD, HANSEN, and BYE, Circuit Judges.

___________ PER CURIAM. Louis Williams appeals the district court’s 1 denial of his 28 U.S.C. § 144 motion. Havingcarefully reviewed the record, we conclude that the judge was not required to recuse himself, and we therefore affirm the judgment of the district court. See 8th Cir. R. 47A(a).-2-

A true copy. Attest: CLERK, U.S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.
p.1 

OAR Box 1828 

Prepped by Ollie Stewart 

Document Number: 

233) ll-K- (I) -46 

Docket Number: 

A-83-27 

Printed 11/12/2008 11:12:56 AM Sheet 233 of 325 
P.2 

a~gj 

H-K-(I)-46 

TWO-FOR-ONE. 

EEA, Inc. 

February 5, 1980. 

THIS INFORMATION CAN BE FOUND IN DOCKET A-79-02, ITEM 

II-K-(I)-46
MEMORANDUM

SUBJECT: Summary of Public Input from a listening-session meeting on March 15, 2011

regarding the Environmental Protection Agency’s Implementation of 

Executive Order 13563: Improving Regulation and Regulatory Review

FROM: Lawrence Grandison, Director, Office of Communication and Public 

Involvement, Region 8

TO: Public Docket EPA-HQ-OA-2011-0163 for Improving Regulations: State, 

Local and Tribal governments

The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is beginning a new periodic 

retrospective review of our existing significant regulations, to determine whether any such 

regulations should be modified, streamlined, expanded, or repealed, so as to make the Agency’s 

regulatory program more effective or less burdensome in achieving the regulatory

objectives. 

As called for by President Obama in Executive Order 13563, "to facilitate the periodic 

review of existing significant regulations," EPA will "consider how best to promote retrospective 

analysis of rules that may be outmoded, ineffective, insufficient, or excessively burdensome, and 

to modify, streamline, expand, or repeal them in accordance with what has been learned." 

As part of this effort, EPA convened public meetings to gather input on how we might 

design the plan we will use to periodically review our regulations. This Memo transmits to the 

docket a summary of the input received from public stakeholders at a meeting with Region 8 

Tribal leaders held on March 15, 2011 at the EPA office in Denver. 

Regional Administrator Jim Martin was the primary facilitator for this session. Jim 

opened with a brief description of the purpose for the session and then began accepting 

comments which were noted in the document submitted in tandem with this memo. The session 

lasted approximately 60 minutes. There were no break-out sessions.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY HIGH

 204

 201

 196

 190

 180

 183

 213

 233

 232

 202

 188

 181

 179

 177

 180

 180

 164

 164

 191

 230

 242

 238

 217

 263

 299

 334

 375

 392

 413

 430

 435

 156

 162

 149

 131

 128

 143

 176

 179

 182

 167

 149

 144

 142

 131

 145

 153

 136

 138

 156

 174

 187

 180

 177

 158

 159

 164

 163

 165

 168

 170

 171

 177

 185

 176

 162

 152

 162

 190

 207

 203

 182

 167

 158

 157

 152

 162

 167

 149

 150

 167

 199

 224

 207

 202

 220

 235

 245

 256

 258

 271

 274

 282

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

JULY 2011 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: August 24, 2011

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

DELTA MENDOTA CANAL AT CHECK 13 (O'NEILL)
### §§3461 to 3463. Repealed. Pub. L. 116–113, title VI, §601, Jan. 29, 2020, 134 Stat. 78

Section 3461, Pub. L. 103–182, title V, §511, Dec. 8, 1993, 107 Stat. 2154, expressed the sense of Congress regarding discriminatory taxes.

Section 3462, Pub. L. 103–182, title V, §512, Dec. 8, 1993, 107 Stat. 2155, required the President to provide to Congress a comprehensive study on the operation and effects of NAFTA.

Section 3463, Pub. L. 103–182, title V, §514, Dec. 8, 1993, 107 Stat. 2157, required reports on the impact of NAFTA on motor vehicle exports to Mexico.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date of Repeal

Repeal effective on the date on which the USMCA entered into force (July 1, 2020), see section 601 of Pub. L. 116–113, set out as a note under former section 3301 of this title.

#### Effective Date

Pub. L. 103–182, title V, §516, Dec. 8, 1993, 107 Stat. 2160, which provided that subtitle B of title V of Pub. L. 103–182, except for section 515, took effect on the date the North American Free Trade Agreement entered into force with respect to the United States (Jan. 1, 1994), was repealed by Pub. L. 116–113, title VI, §601, Jan. 29, 2020, 134 Stat. 78, effective on the date the USMCA entered into force (July 1, 2020).
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY ELEV

 360.05

 360.05

 360.05

 360.05

 360.05

 360.05

 360.03

 360.05

 360.05

 360.05

 360.05

 360.05

 360.05

 360.05

 360.05

 360.05

 360.05

 360.05

 360.05

 360.05

 360.05

 360.05

 360.05

 360.05

 360.05

 360.05

 360.05

 360.05

 360.05

 360.05

 360.05

 541

 541

 541

 541

 541

 541

 539

 541

 541

 541

 541

 541

 541

 541

 541

 541

 541

 541

 541

 541

 541

 541

 541

 541

 541

 541

 541

 541

 541

 541

 541

STORAGE

+0

+0

+0

+0

+0

+0

-2

+2

+0

+0

+0

+0

+0

+0

+0

+0

+0

+0

+0

+0

+0

+0

+0

+0

+0

+0

+0

+0

+0

+0

+0

CHANGE

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 304

 312

 303

 303

 305

 305

 307

 305

 311

 311

 308

 308

 311

 310

 313

 311

 310

 316

 309

 309

 313

 310

 312

 313

 311

 310

 310

 310

 312

 309

 312

SPILL

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

OUTLET

OAKDALE IRRIGATION DISTRICT

SOUTH SAN JOAQUIN IRRIGATION DISTRICT

TRI DAMS PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

JANUARY 2002 GOODWIN RESERVOIR DAILY OPERATIONS RUN DATE: September 14, 2004

RES.

ACRE-FEET

RELEASE - C.F.S. 

TOTALS +0 0 9,593 0

ACRE-FEET +0 0 19,028 0

SUMMARY

RELEASE (ACRE-FEET)

JOINT MAIN CANAL 83

SOUTH MAIN CANAL 0

 19,111

 541

OUTLET 0

TOTAL 

TULLOCH

RELEASE

 284

 273

 277

 285

 287

 287

 289

 277

 293

 292

 302

 339

 354

 352

 355

 345

 339

 341

 336

 340

 340

 337

 339

 338

 337

 332

 337

 336

 297

 305

 336

 9,881

 19,599

JOINT MAIN OPERATED BY SSJID AND OID.

SOUTH MAIN OPERATED BY OID.

JOINT

MAIN

SOUTH

MAIN

SPILL 19,028

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 1

 5

 5

 4

 3

 3

 3

 3

 3

 3

 3

 3

 3

 42

 83

RIVER CANALS
#### Helen Eifert, as Administratrix of the Estate of John Eifert, Deceased, Respondent, v. Burkard Builders, Inc., et al., Appellants, et al., Defendants.

No opinion. Present — Hagarty, Johnston, Adel, Taylor and Lewis, JJ.
#### Dora Gulnack Hudler, Appellant, v. Davis Winne Hudler, Respondent.

Order unanimously affirmed, with costs.
§ 9.42 Cole Ranch. ( a ) *Name.* The name of the viticultural area described in this section is “Cole Ranch.”
( b ) *Approved map.* The approved map for the Cole Ranch viticultural area is the U.S.G.S. map entitled “Elledge Peak Quadrangle California—Mendocino County,” 7.5 minute series (topographic), 1958.
( c ) *Boundaries.* The boundaries of the Cole Ranch viticultural area are located in Mendocino County California and are as follows: ( 1 ) The point of beginning is the intersection of the 1480-foot-elevation contour line with the Boonville-Ukiah Cutoff Road near the southest coner of section 13;
( 2 ) The Boundary follows the 1480-foot-elevation contour line southerly, then easterly, within section 24, then easterly and northwesterly within section 19 to its first intersection with this section line. The boundary proceeds due west on the north section line of section 19 until it intersects with the Boonville-Ukiah Cutoff Road;
( 3 ) The boundary follows this road northwesterly to the point of beginning.
[T.D. ATF-130, 48 FR 16248, Apr. 15, 1983]
### §§8221 to 8224. Repealed. Pub. L. 105–277, div. A, §101(f) [title VIII, §301(c)(2)], Oct. 21, 1998, 112 Stat. 2681–337, 2681–410

Section 8221, Pub. L. 89–10, title X, §10801, as added Pub. L. 103–382, title I, §101, Oct. 20, 1994, 108 Stat. 3844, related to findings and purposes.

Section 8222, Pub. L. 89–10, title X, §10802, as added Pub. L. 103–382, title I, §101, Oct. 20, 1994, 108 Stat. 3844, related to grant authorization.

Section 8223, Pub. L. 89–10, title X, §10803, as added Pub. L. 103–382, title I, §101, Oct. 20, 1994, 108 Stat. 3844, prohibited use of grant funds for construction.

Section 8224, Pub. L. 89–10, title X, §10804, as added Pub. L. 103–382, title I, §101, Oct. 20, 1994, 108 Stat. 3844, related to authorization of appropriations.
###### Editorial Note on Part 40

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 40 appear by T.D. ATF-460, 66 FR 39094-39096, July 27, 2001; T.D. ATF-464, 66 FR 43479, Aug. 20, 2001; and T.D. TTB-91, 76 FR 5479, Feb. 1, 2011.

#### § 40.76 Retention of permit and supporting documents.

The manufacturer shall retain his permit, together with the copy of the application and supporting documents returned to him with the permit, at the same place where the records required by this part are kept and they shall be made available for inspection by any appropriate TTB officer upon his request.

(72 Stat. 1421, 1423; 26 U.S.C. 5712, 5713, 5741)
Exhibit 23.1


CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM





We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements (Form S-8 Nos. 33-8306, 33-27367, 33-37432, 333-40595, 33-57330, 33-58745, 333-84149, 333-60946, 333-102542, 333-128747, 333-129856, 333-158743 and Form S-3ASR No. 333-144193) of Linear Technology Corporation of our reports dated August 19, 2010, with respect to the consolidated financial statements and schedule of Linear Technology Corporation, and the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting of Linear Technology Corporation, included in this Annual Report (Form 10-K) for the fiscal year ended June 27, 2010.











San Jose, California


August 19, 2010
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1998
<CASH>                                         234,903
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  317,298
<ALLOWANCES>                                    20,572
<INVENTORY>                                    411,727
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             1,015,798
<PP&E>                                         161,784
<DEPRECIATION>                                  43,262
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               7,002,564
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          707,427
<BONDS>                                        760,530
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                     1,221,408
<OTHER-SE>                                      98,764
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 7,002,564
<SALES>                                      2,205,510
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             2,205,510
<CGS>                                        1,274,784
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                1,274,784
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               698,996
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             103,258
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                129,140
<INCOME-TAX>                                    37,313
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              4,565
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     4,565
<EPS-BASIC>                                          0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0


</TABLE>
A-AA+Skip to content

                  - Home
                  - Compendium Statistics
                  - Event
                  - Archives
                  - Glossary
                  - Help
                  - Contact
                  - Research on Disability

Annual Disability Statistics Compendium

              - Home /
              - Archives /
              - 2012 Compendium Statistics /
              - 2012 Employment /
              - 2012 2.10 Change in Employment Gap - Civilians Ages 18-64 Years Living in the Community for the U.S.

## Table 2.10: Change in Employment Gap—Civilians Ages 18 to 64 Years Living in the Community for the United States and States, by Disability Status: 2010 to 2011

----

----

 

----

#### 2012 Disability Compendium

                        - Home
                        - Compendium Statistics                           - Population and Prevelance
                          - Employment
                          - Time Trend Population Statistics
                          - Poverty
                          - Earnings
                          - Veterans
                          - Health Insurance Coverage
                          - Health
                          - Social Security Administration Programs
                          - Medicaid and Medicare
                          - Special Education
                          - Vocational Rehabilitation
                          - Federal Government Spending and Employment
                          - International Disability Statistics
                          - Population Statistics: Disability Type
                        - Event
                        - Archives                           - 2012 Compendium Statistics
                        - Glossary
                        - Help
                        - Contact
                        - Research on Disability

#### Funding for this project is made possible by:

 The Research and Training Center on Disability Statistics and Demographics (StatsRRTC), which is funded by the U.S. Department of Education, National Institute for Disability and Rehabilitation Research, under cooperative agreements H133B080012.

#### Stay Connected

**Institute on Disability**10 West Edge Drive, Suite 101Durham, NH 03824603.862.4320 | relay: 711 | [email protected]www.iod.unh.edu

© 2013. Institute on Disability.University of New Hampshire.
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Jorge FLORES-VELASQUEZ, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 04-51264.

Conference Calendar.

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.

Decided Feb. 23, 2006.

Joseph H. Gay, Jr., Assistant U.S. Attorney, U.S. Attorney’s Office Western District of Texas, San Antonio, TX, for Plaintiff-Appellee.

Judy Fulmer Madewell, Federal Public Defender’s Office Western District of Texas, San Antonio, TX, for Defendant-Appellant.

Before GARZA, DENNIS, and PRADO, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: *

Jorge Flores-Velasquez (Flores) appeals from a guilty-plea conviction for being an alien unlawfully present in the United States after deportation. *See*8 U.S.C. § 1326.

For the first time on appeal, Flores argues that the district court violated the holding in *United States v. Booker,*543 U.S. 220, 125 S.Ct. 738, 160 L.Ed.2d 621 (2005), by increasing his criminal history score based upon facts not admitted by him or found by a jury and by sentencing him under an unconstitutional sentencing guideline scheme. Flores’s arguments are reviewed for plain error. *See United States v. Mares,*402 F.3d 511, 520 (5th Cir.), *cert. denied,*— U.S.-, 126 S.Ct. 43, 163 L.Ed.2d 76 (2005). Flores does not demonstrate that the district court would have imposed a different sentence under an advisory guideline scheme. *See id.*at 521-22. Accordingly, Flores cannot establish that his substantial rights were affected. *See id.*

Flores also challenges the constitutionality of § 1326(b). His constitutional challenge is foreclosed by *Almendarez-Torres v. United States,*523 U.S. 224, 235, 118 S.Ct. 1219, 140 L.Ed.2d 350 (1998). Although Flores contends that *Almendarez-Torres*was incorrectly decided and that a majority of the Supreme Court would overrule *Almendarez-Torres*in light of *Apprendi v. New Jersey,*530 U.S. 466, 120 S.Ct. 2348, 147 L.Ed.2d 435 (2000), we have repeatedly rejected such arguments on the basis that *Almendarez-Torres*remains binding. *See United States v. Garza-Lopez,*410 F.3d 268, 276 (5th Cir.), *651
      *cert, denied,*— U.S.-, 126 S.Ct. 298, 163 L.Ed.2d 260 (2005). Flores properly concedes that his argument is foreclosed in light of *Almendarez-Torres*and circuit precedent, but he raises it here to preserve it for further review.

AFFIRMED.

Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.
Jump to main content.

Office of the Chief Financial Officer

Recent Additions | Contact Us Search: All EPA This Area         
- You are here:  EPA Home 
- OCFO Home 
- FY 2011-2015 Strategic Plan 
FY 2011-2015 Strategic PlanProgram Evaluations
EPA uses program evaluations to assess whether programs are meeting       intended outcomes. In developing the FY 2011-2015 Strategic Plan,       EPA considered the results of past       evaluations to inform future program strategies and identified a       preliminary       list of future program evaluations EPA plans to conduct.
Past EPA Strategic Plans
Check out the history of EPA�s strategic Plan.

2006-2011       Strategic Plan

2003-2008       Strategic Plan

2000-2005       Strategic Plan

1997-2002       Strategic Plan

EPA�s FY       2011-2015 Strategic Plan provides a blueprint for advancing Administrator       Lisa Jackson�s seven priorities and EPA�s mission to protect human       health and the environment. EPA submitted the Plan on September       30, 2010 to the Congress and to the Office of Management and Budget. 

The Plan identifies the measurable environmental and human       health outcomes the public can expect over the next five years and       describes how we intend to achieve those results. The Plan       represents a commitment to our core values of science, transparency, and       the rule of law in managing our programs.

The Plan identifies five strategic goals to guide the Agency�s       work:
- Goal 1: Taking Action on Climate Change and Improving Air Quality         
- Goal         2: Protecting America�s Waters 
- Goal 3: Cleaning Up Communities and Advancing Sustainable         Development         
- Goal 4: Ensuring the Safety of Chemicals and Preventing Pollution         
- Goal 5: Enforcing Environmental Laws 

The Plan also introduces five cross-cutting fundamental       strategies which set clear expectations for changing the way EPA does       business in achieving its results.  EPA's FY 2011 Action Plans       (linked from the strategies below) provide specific Agency commitments to       implement and advance each of the strategies this year.
- Expanding         the Conversation on Environmentalism 
- Working         for Environmental Justice and Children�s Health 
- Advancing         Science, Research, and Technological Innovation 
- Strengthening         State, Tribal, and International Partnerships 
- Strengthening         EPA�s Workforce and Capabilities 
Local Navigation- OCFO Home 
- Basic Information  
- OCFO Contacts  
- EPA Budget 
- EPA Strategic Plan 
- Environmental   Futures 
- EPA   Financial and Performance Reports 
- Financial   Information 
- Financial   Services 
- Environmental Finance Program 
- Careers and Internships 
- EPA Home 
- Privacy and Security   Notice 
- Contact   Us 

Jump to main content.
#### Abe Brown, Respondent, v. Frederick Rickenbacher, Appellant.

No opinion. Present — Martin, P. J., Untermyer, Dore, Cohn and Callahan, JJ.; Dore, J., dissents and votes to reverse and grant a new trial on the ground that the verdict is against the weight of the credible evidence.