alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Editorial Note on Part 4
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 4 appear by T.D. ATF-425, 65 FR 11890, Mar. 7, 2000.

§ 4.24 Generic, semi-generic, and non-generic designations of geographic significance. ( a ) ( 1 ) A name of geographic significance which is also the designation of a class or type of wine, shall be deemed to have become generic only if so found by the Administrator.
( 2 ) Examples of generic names, originally having geographic significance, which are designations for a class or type of wine are: Vermouth, Sake.
( b ) ( 1 ) A name of geographic significance, which is also the designation of a class or type of wine, shall be deemed to have become semi-generic only if so found by the Administrator. Semi-generic designations may be used to designate wines of an origin other than that indicated by such name only if there appears in direct conjunction therewith an appropriate appellation of origin disclosing the true place of origin of the wine, and if the wine so designated conforms to the standard of identity, if any, for such wine contained in the regulations in this part or, if there be no such standard, to the trade understanding of such class or type. See § 24.257(c) of this chapter for exceptions to the Administrator's authority to remove names from paragraph (b)(2) of this section.
( 2 ) Examples of semi-generic names which are also type designations for grape wines are Angelica, Burgundy, Claret, Chablis, Champagne, Chianti, Malaga, Marsala, Madeira, Moselle, Port, Rhine Wine (syn. Hock), Sauterne, Haut Sauterne, Sherry, Tokay.
( c ) ( 1 ) A name of geographic significance, which has not been found by the Administrator to be generic or semi-generic may be used only to designate wines of the origin indicated by such name, but such name shall not be deemed to be the distinctive designation of a wine unless the Administrator finds that it is known to the consumer and to the trade as the designation of a specific wine of a particular place or region, distinguishable from all other wines.
( 2 ) Examples of nongeneric names which are not distinctive designations of specific grape wines are: American, California, Lake Erie, Napa Valley, New York State, French, Spanish. Additional examples of foreign nongeneric names are listed in subpart C of part 12 of this chapter.
( 3 ) Examples of nongeneric names which are also distinctive designations of specific grape wines are: Bordeaux Blanc, Bordeaux Rouge, Graves, Medoc, Saint-Julien, Chateau Yquem, Chateau Margaux, Chateau Lafite, Pommard, Chambertin, Montrachet, Rhone, Liebfraumilch, Rudesheimer, Forster, Deidesheimer, Schloss Johannisberger, Lagrima, and Lacryma Christi. A list of foreign distinctive designations, as determined by the Administrator, appears in subpart D of part 12 of this chapter.
[T.D. 6521, 25 FR 13835, Dec. 29, 1960, as amended by T.D. ATF-296, 55 FR 17967, Apr. 30, 1990; T.D. ATF-398, 63 FR 44783, Aug. 21, 1998; T.D. ATF-425, 65 FR 11890, 11891, Mar. 7, 2000]
EXHIBIT 10.33

                                 FIRST AMENDMENT
                             TO EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT
                               DATED JUNE 5, 1997




     Reference is made to the Executive Employment Agreement dated as of June 5,
1997 (the  "Agreement")  by and between J.  Baker,  Inc.  and Roger J.  Osborne.
Pursuant to paragraph 19 of the  Agreement and in order to further amend certain
provisions of the Agreement, the Agreement is hereby amended as follows:

         1. Paragraph 3(a) of the Agreement  entitled  "Compensation"  is hereby
amended  by  deleting  the  figure  "$220,000"  in the third  line  thereof  and
inserting in its place the figure "$250,000".

         2.  Paragraph 6 of the  Agreement  is hereby  amended by  deleting  the
phrase  "ending on June 5, 1999" in the fifth line thereof and  inserting in its
place the phrase "ending on April 30, 2000".

         3. All other terms of the Agreement shall remain unchanged and continue
in full force and effect.



J. BAKER, INC.




By:/s/ Alan I. Weinstein                     April 10, 1998
   --------------------------------          --------------
Alan I. Weinstein                            Date
President and
Chief Executive Officer



/s/ Roger J. Osborne                         April 10, 1998
--------------------                         --------------
Roger J. Osborne                             Date
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY HIGH

 351

 324

 279

 216

 222

 251

 257

 233

 222

 225

 221

 244

 242

 217

 231

 230

 210

 218

 224

 213

 235

 547

 1,294

 5,280

 9,922

 5,395

 2,937

 2,028

 1,180

 576

 253

 257

 167

 125

 134

 141

 154

 132

 143

 153

 153

 161

 162

 169

 181

 171

 179

 177

 177

 174

 179

 173

 169

 169

 177

 181

 197

 198

 207

 216

 212

 201

 306

 253

 189

 166

 174

 185

 169

 175

 174

 174

 180

 189

 190

 192

 192

 192

 187

 193

 192

 190

 192

 211

 282

 821

 1,947

 884

 518

 440

 321

 252

 227

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

JANUARY 2006 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: February 7, 2006

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

PORT CHICAGO BOTTOM IN SUISUN BAY
Electrical Conductivity, UMHOS

Day High Low Mean

1 280 224 244

2 269 226 243

3 255 224 236

4 238 223 231

5 250 222 236

6 281 225 246

7 321 228 262

8 338 236 269

9 343 241 270

10 354 234 265

11 361 234 273

12 365 234 274

13 358 238 278

14 360 242 280

15 354 248 280

16 362 242 282

17 365 238 279

18 0 0 0

19 379 240 292

20 381 236 297

21 382 236 291

22 386 239 290

23 396 239 285

24 395 242 286

25 399 241 282

26 401 237 286

27 399 235 292

28 398 229 300

29 386 237 300

30 388 240 297

COMMENT(S):

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

Historical Archive and Report Database

Delta Mendota Canal At Check 13 O'Neill

Period: September 2023 Run Date: 10/6/2023
#### Henry T. SANDERS, Appellant v. UNITED STATES of America and United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, Appellees.

No. 05-5264.

United States Court of Appeals, District of Columbia Circuit.

Oct. 17, 2005.

Henry T. Sanders, Landover, MD, pro se.

R. Craig Lawrence, Assistant U.S. Attorney, U.S. Attorney’s Office, Washington, DC, for Defendant-Appellee.

*447Before GINSBURG, Chief Judge, and RANDOLPH and ROGERS, Circuit Judges.

*JUDGMENT*

PER CURIAM

This appeal was considered on the record from the United States District Court for the District of Columbia and on the brief, the supplement thereto; and the appendix, and the supplements thereto, filed by appellant. It is

ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that the district court’s order filed June 9, 2005 be affirmed. The district court correctly concluded that it lacked jurisdiction to review decisions of the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit. *See*28 U.S.C. § 1254 (providing for Supreme Court review, by way of writ of certiorari, of decisions of circuit courts of appeals).

Appellant claims that he has a pending motion for reconsideration upon which the district court refuses to act. To the extent appellant seeks mandamus to compel district court action, he has not shown a “clear and indisputable” right to mandamus relief. *See Gulfstream Aerospace Corp. v. Mayacamas Corp.,*485 U.S. 271, 289, 108 S.Ct. 1133, 99 L.Ed.2d 296 (1988). The docket in 05cvll57 shows that a post-judgment motion has been pending in district court only since July 5, 2005. Furthermore, the pendency of such a motion does not bar appellate review of the order dismissing appellant’s action. *See Hoai v. Vo.,*935 F.2d 308, 312 (D.C.Cir.1991).

Pursuant to D.C. Circuit Rule 36, this disposition will not be published. The Clerk is directed to withhold issuance of the mandate herein until seven days after resolution of any timely petition for rehearing or petition for rehearing en banc. *See*Fed. R.App. P. 41(b); D.C.Cir. Rule 41.
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
 Washington, D.C. 20549
 FORM 8-K
 CURRENT REPORT
Pursuant to Section 13 of 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
 June 30, 2011  Date of Report (Date of earliest event reported)
 LOCAL.COM CORPORATION
  Delaware
    
    001-34197
    
    33-0849123(State or other jurisdiction
    
    (Commission File Number)
    
    (IRS Employerof incorporation)
    
    
    
    Identification No.)
 7555 Irvine Center Drive
Irvine, California 92618
 (949) 784-0800
 One Technology Drive, Building G
Irvine, California 92618
  o
    
    Written communications pursuant to Rule 425 under the Securities Act (17 CFR 230.425)o
    
    Soliciting material pursuant to Rule 14a-12 under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.14a-12)o
    
    Pre-commencement communications pursuant to Rule 14d-2(b) under the Exchange Act (17 CFR
240.14d-2(b))o
    
    Pre-commencement communications pursuant to Rule 13e-4(c) under the Exchange Act (17 CFR
240.13e-4(c))




---



##### 



Item 1.01 Entry into a Material Definitive Agreement.
   Item 9.01 Financial Statements and Exhibits.
 Exhibit 10.1(1)
    
    Google Services Agreement dated June 30, 2011 by and among the Registrant and Google Inc.
 
 (1)
    
    Application has been made with the Securities and Exchange Commission to seek confidential
treatment of certain provisions. Omitted material for which confidential treatment has been
requested has been filed separately with the Securities and Exchange Commission.




---



##### 



SIGNATURES
  LOCAL.COM CORPORATIONDate: July 7, 2011
    By:
    /s/ Kenneth S. CragunKenneth S. CragunChief Financial Officer and Secretary




---



##### 



Exhibit Index
 ExhibitNumber
    
    Description10.1(1)
    
    Google Services Agreement dated June 30, 2011 by and among the
Registrant and Google Inc.
 
 (1)
    
    Application has been made with the Securities and Exchange Commission to seek confidential
treatment of certain provisions. Omitted material for which confidential treatment has been
requested has been filed separately with the Securities and Exchange Commission.
#### § 10.736 What are the time limits for filing a LEO claim?

OWCP must receive a claim for benefits under 5 U.S.C. 8191 within five years after the injury or death. This five-year limitation is not subject to waiver. The tolling provisions of 5 U.S.C. 8122(d) do not apply to these claims.
|  |  | [if !vml]>[endif]>

You have  reached the Federal Depository Library Program Electronic Collection  (FDLP/EC) Archive. This archive assures ongoing access to publications in the  FDLP/EC. Access to publications in the archive is available through GPO's  suite of cataloging and locator services, including the Catalog of U.S.  Government Publications (CGP).
Title: National      compensation survey. Greensboro-High Point, NC.
 
 
SuDocs Number: [if !vml]>[endif]> L 2.121/33:G 85/
Item    Number: [if !vml]>[endif]> 0768-B-33 (online)
System    Number: 000865811
 
 
 
2010    | 2009    | 2008    | 2007
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
A service of the Superintendent of Documents,  U.S. Government Printing Office..

 

Last updated:  April 21, 2020  Page Name:  http://permanent.access.gpo.gov/
perm |
|--|--|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
**EXHIBIT 12.1**

 

**FORM10-Q**

**PACCAR FINANCIALCORP.**

 

### **COMPUTATIONOF RATIO OF EARNINGS TO FIXED CHARGES**

 

**PURSUANT TO SEC REPORTING REQUIREMENTS**(1)

(Millions of Dollars)

 
|                                |   | **Nine  Months Ended  September 30** | ** **  |
|-------------------------------------|--------|-------------------------------------------|-------------|
|                                |   | **2003**                                  |        | **2002** | ** ** |
|                                |   |                                      | ** **  |   |   |
| FIXED  CHARGES                      |   |                                      | ** **  |   |   |
| Interest  expense                   |   | **$**                                     | **61.8**    | ** ** | $ | 89.1 |   |
| Portion of  rentals deemed interest |   | **1.0**                                   | ** **  | .8 |   |
|                                |   |                                      | ** **  |   |   |
| TOTAL FIXED  CHARGES                |   | **$**                                     | **62.8**    | ** ** | $ | 89.9 |   |
|                                |   |                                      | ** **  |   |   |
| EARNINGS                            |   |                                      | ** **  |   |   |
| Income  before income taxes         |   | **$**                                     | **55.7**    | ** ** | $ | 27.1 |   |
| Fixed  charges                      |   | **62.8**                                  | ** **  | 89.9 |   |
|                                |   |                                      | ** **  |   |   |
| EARNINGS AS  DEFINED                |   | **$**                                     | **118.5**   | ** ** | $ | 117.0 |   |
|                                |   |                                      | ** **  |   |   |
| RATIO OF  EARNINGS TO FIXED CHARGES |   | **1.89**                                  | **x ** | 1.30 | x |

 

----

(1) The method of computing theratio of earnings to fixed charges shown above complies with SEC reportingrequirements but differs from the method called for in the Support Agreementbetween the Company and PACCAR as shown in Exhibit 12.2.

 

1

----
BEFORE THE 

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 

WASHINGTON, D.C. 

__________________________________________ 

 ) 

Application of ) 

 ) 

AEROVIAS DE MEXICO, S.A. DE C.V. ) 

 ) DOCKET OST-2009-0159 

 for renewal of exemption authority ) 

(Monterrey-San Antonio) ) 

__________________________________________) 

AMENDMENT TO APPLICATION OF 

AEROVIAS DE MEXICO, S.A. DE C.V. 

FOR RENEWAL OF EXEMPTION 

Communications with respect to this document should be sent to: 

John R. Mietus, Jr. 

Law Office of John Mietus, LLC 

6701 Democracy Blvd., Suite 300 

Bethesda, MD 20817-7500

(202) 747-5212 

(240) 396-5362 fax 

john@mietuslaw.com 

Counsel for AEROVIAS DE MEXICO, 

S.A. DE C.V.

 

February 22, 2013
BEFORE THE 

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 

WASHINGTON, D.C. 

__________________________________________ 

 ) 

Application of ) 

 ) 

AEROVIAS DE MEXICO, S.A. DE C.V. ) 

 ) DOCKET OST-2009-0159 

 for renewal of exemption authority ) February 22, 2013 

(Monterrey-San Antonio) ) 

__________________________________________) 

AMENDMENT TO APPLICATION OF 

AEROVIAS DE MEXICO, S.A. DE C.V. 

FOR RENEWAL OF EXEMPTION 

 By application dated November 30, 2012, Aerovias de Mexico, S.A. de 

C.V. ("Aeromexico") requested renewal of the above-captioned exemption 

authority to engage in scheduled foreign air transportation of persons, 

property, and mail between Monterrey, Mexico and San Antonio, Texas in 

Docket OST-2009-0159. That request was included in an application that 

aggregated renewal applications from ten separate dockets. 

 Aeromexico respectfully amends its application to request that its 

authority to conduct services in that markets be renewed, but limited to 

services conducted by displaying the “AM” designator code on flights operated 

by Aerolitoral, S.A. de C.V. d/b/a Aeromexico Connect. Aerolitoral has 

applied for exemption authority, and a statement of authorization to display 

the “AM” designator code of Aeromexico, in the market in Docket OST-2013-
TToo nn aass kkee tt

RRaann gg ee rr DDii ssttrrii cc tt

Twisp

Methow

Mazama

Carlton

Pateros

Winthrop

SR20

SR153

S

R97

SR97

T34R19E

T30R21E

T34R18E

T33R19E

T34R17E

T35R19E

T33R21E

T37R23E

T38R20E

T34R20E

T31R21E

T38R18E

T33R22E

T38R23E T38R22E

T37R22E

T34R21E

T33R20E

T37R18E

T35R20E

T38R21E

T35R21E

T35R18E

T32R23E

T36R19E

T37R17E

T36R21E

T38R19E

T39R18E

T37R19E

T39R17E

T34R22E

T31R20E T31R22E

T33R23E

T36R18E

T38R17E

T39R23E T39R22E T39R19E T39R20E

T35R17E

T39R21E

T31R23E

T36R20E

T32R22E

T36R17E

T34R23E

T32R21E

T35R22E

T36R22E

T35R23E

T40R23E

T32R20E

T40R20E

T30R22E

T40R22E

T36R23E

T37R21E

T40R21E

T37R20E

T30R23E

T29R22E

T40R17E T40R18E T40R19E

T32R19E

T36R16E

T28R22E

T29R23E

T35R16E

T30R20E

T39R14E

T38R14E

T40R14E

T37R16E

T38R16E

T28R23E

T39R16E

T40R16E

T33R18E

T31R19E

T37R14E

T34R16E

T36R14E

T29R21E

T32R18E

T29R20E

T35R14E

T40R24E

T39R24E

T33R16E T33R17E

T41R14E

T30R19E

T38R24E

T37R24E

T36R24E

T35R24E

T34R24E

T33R24E

T32R24E

T31R24E

Legend

Hwy

River

Alta Lake

Bear/ Ramsey/ Volstead

Lake Chelan -Sawtooth

Middle Methow

North Cascades

Pasayten Wilderness

Sawtooth Backcountry

This product is produced from information prepared by USDA, Forest Service, or from other suppliers.

The Forest Service can not assure the reliability or suitability of this information for a particular purpose.

The data and product accuracy may vary due to compilations from various sources, including modeling

This information may be used, corrected, or otherwise modified without notification.

The USDA is an equal opportunity provider and employer

Map 1-3.

1:348,911

NAD 1983 Datum; Projected in USFS R6 Albers

Pack and Saddle Stock Outfitter-Guide

Special Use Permit Issuance DEIS

Map 1-3. Analysis Area Subunits ---------------------------------------------------------------

Okanogan-Wenatchee National Forest

Methow Valley Ranger District

Winthrop, Washington

0 6,000 12,000 24,000 36,000 Feet

0 1,350 2,700 5,400 8,100 Meters
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

DAY

 33,660

 33,554

 33,481

 33,410

 33,317

 33,187

 33,051

 32,942

 32,805

 32,666

 32,567

 32,472

 32,383

 32,302

 32,218

 32,058

 31,940

 31,829

 31,508

 31,326

 31,155

 31,034

 30,894

 30,723

 30,532

 30,276

 29,972

 29,674

 29,437

 29,230

 76,347

 75,495

 74,595

 73,693

 72,809

 71,979

 71,140

 70,267

 69,429

 68,557

 67,678

 66,778

 65,876

 65,224

 64,690

 64,250

 63,738

 63,232

 62,941

 62,481

 62,053

 61,547

 61,073

 60,630

 60,193

 59,830

 59,515

 59,200

 58,838

 58,406

STORAGE - A.F. 

 110,007

 109,049

 108,076

 107,103

 106,126

 105,166

 104,191

 103,209

 102,234

 101,223

 100,245

 99,250

 98,259

 97,526

 96,908

 96,308

 95,678

 95,061

 94,449

 93,807

 93,208

 92,581

 91,967

 91,353

 90,725

 90,106

 89,487

 88,874

 88,275

 87,636

782

745

719

697

741

874

731

840

799

796

768

766

714

703

694

587

603

659

791

695

584

563

550

596

602

728

766

649

588

540

290

262

228

206

248

390

239

345

307

286

275

264

214

333

382

285

285

348

482

371

282

247

240

286

285

416

454

340

286

218

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

SEPTEMBER 2016 FULL NATURAL FLOW AT NEW MELONES DAM RUN DATE: 10/03/2016

TOTALS -23,346 9,094

* October 1, 18,038

 943.3

 943.8

 944.2

 944.6

 945.1

 945.9

 946.4

 947.1

 947.7

 948.2

 948.8

 949.3

 949.7

 950.4

 951.2

 951.7

 952.3

 953.0

 953.9

 954.7

 955.2

 955.7

 956.2

 956.8

 957.3

 958.2

 959.1

 959.7

 960.3

 960.7

DONNELLS

RES

BEARDSLEY

RES

2015 TO DATE

NEW

MELONES

INFLOW

C.F.S

NATURAL

RIVER

C.F.S

ACCUM *

FULL

NATURAL

1000 A.F.

RESERVOIR

TOTAL

-975

-958

-973

-973

-977

-960

-975

-982

-975

-1,011

-978

-995

-991

-733

-618

-600

-630

-617

-612

-642

-599

-627

-614

-614

-628

-619

-619

-613

-599

-639

CHANGE

A.F. C.F.S.

-492

-483

-491

-491

-493

-484

-492

-495

-492

-510

-493

-502

-500

-370

-312

-302

-318

-311

-309

-324

-302

-316

-310

-310

-317

-312

-312

-309

-302

-322
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA

FOURTH DISTRICT

RAYMOND C. GLEASON,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellee.

No. 4D20-1613

[November 5, 2020]

Appeal of order denying rule 3.850 motion from the Circuit Court for 

the Nineteenth Judicial Circuit, St. Lucie County; Robert E. Belanger, 

Judge; L.T. Case No. 56-2013-CF-000865A.

Raymond C. Gleason, Live Oak, pro se.

No appearance required for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.

GROSS, CIKLIN and CONNER, JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

DAY HIGH

 328

 322

 325

 328

 329

 328

 330

 328

 328

 326

 326

 328

 328

 331

 328

 328

 329

 324

 326

 328

 329

 331

 337

 337

 334

 334

 337

 341

 311

 314

 309

 305

 313

 312

 307

 312

 313

 310

 308

 313

 314

 315

 312

 311

 313

 311

 313

 316

 312

 306

 309

 307

 309

 310

 313

 315

 319

 317

 316

 317

 319

 319

 321

 319

 320

 320

 319

 319

 321

 320

 317

 317

 317

 316

 318

 321

 318

 318

 319

 319

 319

 319

 320

 322

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

FEBRUARY 2022 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: March 1, 2022

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

HOLLAND TRACT ON OLD RIVER