alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 5.91 Use of the term “pure.” Distilled spirits labels, containers, or packaging may not bear the word “pure” unless it: ( a ) Refers to a particular ingredient used in the production of the distilled spirits, and is a truthful representation about that ingredient;
( b ) Is part of the bona fide name of a permittee or retailer for which the distilled spirits are bottled; or
( c ) Is part of the bona fide name of the permittee that bottled the distilled spirits.
### §§355a to 355c. Repealed. Pub. L. 104–208, div. A, title I, §101(e) [title VII, §708(a)], Sept. 30, 1996, 110 Stat. 3009–233, 3009–312

Section 355a, act June 19, 1956, ch. 407, title II, §201, as added Feb. 11, 1964, Pub. L. 88–269, §7(a), 78 Stat. 13; amended July 19, 1966, Pub. L. 89–511, §6, 80 Stat. 313; Dec. 30, 1970, Pub. L. 91–600, §2(b), 84 Stat. 1668; Oct. 17, 1984, Pub. L. 98–480, title I, §103(b)(1), 98 Stat. 2237; Mar. 15, 1990, Pub. L. 101–254, §16(c)(2), (3), 104 Stat. 106, related to grants to States for public library construction and library and information technology enhancement.

Section 355b, act June 19, 1956, ch. 407, title II, §202, as added Feb. 11, 1964, Pub. L. 88–269, §7(a), 78 Stat. 13; amended July 19, 1966, Pub. L. 89–511, §§7, 12(a), 80 Stat. 313, 318; Dec. 30, 1970, Pub. L. 91–600, §2(b), 84 Stat. 1668; Oct. 7, 1977, Pub. L. 95–123, §6, 91 Stat. 1097; Oct. 17, 1984, Pub. L. 98–480, title I, §112(a), (b)(1), 98 Stat. 2241; Mar. 15, 1990, Pub. L. 101–254, §16(c)(3), (4), 104 Stat. 106, related to Federal share of cost of construction and technology enhancement projects carried under State plans and recovery by United States of value of grant.

Section 355c, act June 19, 1956, ch. 407, title II, §203, as added Feb. 11, 1964, Pub. L. 88–269, §7(a), 78 Stat. 13; amended Apr. 13, 1970, Pub. L. 91–230, title IV, §401(g)(3), 84 Stat. 174; Dec. 30, 1970, Pub. L. 91–600, §2(b), 84 Stat. 1668; Oct. 17, 1984, Pub. L. 98–480, title I, §103(b)(1), 98 Stat. 2237; Mar. 15, 1990, Pub. L. 101–254, §§16(c)(3), (5), 17, 104 Stat. 106, required submission of annual program for construction and technology enhancement of public libraries by any State desiring to receive grant from its allotment and specified contents of such program.

A prior section 355d, act June 19, 1956, ch. 407, title II, §204, as added Feb. 11, 1964, Pub. L. 88–269, §7(a), 78 Stat. 14; amended July 19, 1966, Pub. L. 89–511, §§5(b), (8), 80 Stat. 313, related to payment to States of Federal share and determination of amount of such payment, and was omitted in the general amendment of this chapter by Pub. L. 91–600, §2(b), Dec. 30, 1970, 84 Stat. 1660, effective after June 30, 1971.
```

[Congressional Bills 116th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 5730 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

116th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 5730

   To direct the Homeland Security Council and the National Security 
    Council, in consultation with Federal departments and agencies 
    responsible for biodefense, to update the National Strategy for 
              Pandemic Influenza, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            January 30, 2020

Mr. Larsen of Washington (for himself, Mr. Langevin, and Mr. Carson of 
   Indiana) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
Committee on Energy and Commerce, and in addition to the Committees on 
 Armed Services, Foreign Affairs, Intelligence (Permanent Select), and 
Agriculture, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, 
 in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the 
                jurisdiction of the committee concerned

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
   To direct the Homeland Security Council and the National Security 
    Council, in consultation with Federal departments and agencies 
    responsible for biodefense, to update the National Strategy for 
              Pandemic Influenza, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``National Strategy for Pandemic 
Influenza Update Act''.

SEC. 2. UPDATING AND IMPLEMENTATION OF NATIONAL STRATEGY FOR PANDEMIC 
              INFLUENZA.

    (a) Update of National Strategy.--Not later than 90 days after the 
date of the enactment of this Act, the Homeland Security Council of the 
White House and the National Security Council, in consultation with the 
heads of appropriate Federal departments and agencies responsible for 
biodefense, shall update the National Strategy for Pandemic Influenza 
issued by the Homeland Security Council in November 2005.
    (b) Update of Implementation Plan.--Not later than 180 days after 
the update of the 2005 National Strategy for Pandemic Influenza 
required under subsection (a), the Homeland Security Council and the 
National Security Council shall update the implementation plan 
associated with the 2005 National Strategy to implement such updated 
National Strategy.
                                 <all>
```
#### Jonas Hecht v. Ignatz Wahl.

Motion granted unless appellant complies with terms stated in order. Present—Ingraham, P. J., McLaughlin, Laughlin, Clarke and Scott, JJ.
Order entered May 9 , 2014

In The 

## Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

No. 05
- 13
- 01090
- CR
JEREMY LAMONTE SILLE MON, Appellant

V. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee On Appeal from the 195th Judicial District Court

Dallas County, Texas Trial C ourt Cause No. F12
- 24277
- N



### O RDER
The Court ORDERS the trial court to conduct a hearing to determine why appellant’s brief has not been filed. In this regard, the trial court shall make appropriate findings and recommendations and determine whether app ellant desires to prosecute the appeal, whether appellant is indigent, or if not indigent, whether retained counsel has abandoned the appeal. See
T EX
. R. A PP
. P. 38.8( b ). If the trial court cannot obtain appellant’s presence at the hearing, the
trial cou rt shall conduct the hearing in appellant’s absence. See Meza v. State , 742 S.W.2d 708 (Tex. App.

– Corpus Christi 1987, no pet.) (per curiam). If appellant is indigent, the trial court is ORDERED to take such measures as may be necessary to assure effecti ve representation, which may include appointment of new counsel.We ORDER the trial court to transmit a record of the proceedings, which shall include

written findings and recommendations, to this Court within THIRTY DAYS of the date of this order. This appeal is ABATED to allow the trial court to comply with the above order. The appeal shall be reinstated thirty days from the date of this order or when the findings are received, whichever is earlier.
/s/ CAROLYN WRIGHT CHIEF JUSTICE
### §§385 to 385e. Repealed. Pub. L. 104–208, div. A, title I, §101(e) [title VII, §708(a)], Sept. 30, 1996, 110 Stat. 3009–233, 3009–312

Section 385, act June 19, 1956, ch. 407, title VIII, §801, as added Mar. 15, 1990, Pub. L. 101–254, §23(a), 104 Stat. 107, related to congressional statement of purpose of this part.

Section 385a, act June 19, 1956, ch. 407, title VIII, §802, as added Mar. 15, 1990, Pub. L. 101–254, §23(a), 104 Stat. 108, related to grants for family learning centers.

Section 385b, act June 19, 1956, ch. 407, title VIII, §803, as added Mar. 15, 1990, Pub. L. 101–254, §23(a), 104 Stat. 108, provided that funds made available under this part be used for initiation, expansion, and improvement of public library services, acquisition of resources and materials in print and electronic formats, and acquisition of computer hardware and software.

Section 385c, act June 19, 1956, ch. 407, title VIII, §804, as added Mar. 15, 1990, Pub. L. 101–254, §23(a), 104 Stat. 108, related to application to Secretary by local public library wishing to receive grant under this part.

Section 385d, act June 19, 1956, ch. 407, title VIII, §805, as added Mar. 15, 1990, Pub. L. 101–254, §23(a), 104 Stat. 109, provided for selection of family learning centers via competitive process, required equitable distribution of grants among States and between urban and rural communities under this subchapter, and established maximum amount per grant for any fiscal year.

Section 385e, act June 19, 1956, ch. 407, title VIII, §806, as added Mar. 15, 1990, Pub. L. 101–254, §23(a), 104 Stat. 109; amended Oct. 20, 1994, Pub. L. 103–382, title III, §375(b), 108 Stat. 3979, authorized appropriations to carry out this part.
### Part F—General Provisions
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

DAY

 6,185

 6,111

 6,226

 6,532

 6,987

 7,386

 7,657

 7,857

 7,728

 7,479

 7,250

 7,294

 7,637

 8,142

 8,479

 8,863

 8,961

 9,193

 9,489

 9,592

 9,356

 8,936

 8,454

 8,147

 7,810

 7,832

 8,411

 9,705

 11,025

 11,869

 29,646

 29,626

 29,462

 29,283

 29,066

 28,930

 28,902

 28,907

 29,142

 29,523

 30,081

 30,713

 31,418

 32,272

 33,203

 33,620

 34,334

 35,241

 36,091

 36,902

 37,753

 38,707

 39,577

 40,177

 40,911

 41,617

 42,533

 43,376

 44,172

 45,053

STORAGE - A.F. 

 35,831

 35,737

 35,688

 35,815

 36,053

 36,316

 36,559

 36,764

 36,870

 37,002

 37,331

 38,007

 39,055

 40,414

 41,682

 42,483

 43,295

 44,434

 45,580

 46,494

 47,109

 47,643

 48,031

 48,324

 48,721

 49,449

 50,944

 53,081

 55,197

 56,922

1,151

1,122

1,011

1,192

1,015

1,114

1,203

1,083

1,029

1,154

1,347

1,476

1,399

1,380

1,279

1,191

1,315

1,148

1,091

1,206

1,083

1,066

951

1,092

1,187

1,328

1,391

1,572

1,613

1,544

1,099

1,075

986

1,256

1,135

1,247

1,326

1,186

1,082

1,221

1,513

1,817

1,927

2,065

1,918

1,595

1,724

1,722

1,669

1,667

1,393

1,335

1,147

1,240

1,387

1,695

2,145

2,649

2,680

2,414

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

APRIL 2008 FULL NATURAL FLOW AT NEW MELONES DAM RUN DATE: 06/25/2008

TOTALS +20,988 47,315

* October 1, 93,849

 210.7

 212.8

 214.8

 217.3

 219.5

 222.0

 224.6

 227.0

 229.1

 231.5

 234.5

 238.2

 242.0

 246.1

 249.9

 253.0

 256.5

 259.9

 263.2

 266.5

 269.3

 271.9

 274.2

 276.6

 279.4

 282.7

 287.0

 292.3

 297.6

 302.4

DONNELLS

RES

BEARDSLEY

RES

2007 TO DATE

NEW

MELONES

INFLOW

C.F.S

NATURAL

RIVER

C.F.S

ACCUM *

FULL

NATURAL

1000 A.F.

RESERVOIR

TOTAL

-103

-94

-49

+127

+238

+263

+243

+205

+106

+132

+329

+676

+1,048

+1,359

+1,268

+801

+812

+1,139

+1,146

+914

+615

+534

+388

+293

+397

+728

+1,495

+2,137

+2,116

+1,725

CHANGE

A.F. C.F.S.

-52

-47

-25

+64

+120

+133

+123

+103

+53

+67

+166

+341

+528

+685

+639

+404

+409

+574

+578

+461

+310

+269

+196

+148

+200

+367

+754

+1,077

+1,067

+870
### §402. Repealed. Pub. L. 91–230, title IV, §401(f)(2), Apr. 13, 1970, 84 Stat. 173

Section, Pub. L. 85–864, title I, §102, Sept. 2, 1958, 72 Stat. 1582, prohibited Federal control of education (curriculum, program of instruction, administration, or personnel of any educational institution or school system. See section 1232a of this title.
### §1070d–39. Repealed. Pub. L. 102–325, title IV, §406(g)(1), July 23, 1992, 106 Stat. 509

Section, Pub. L. 89–329, title IV, §419I, as added Pub. L. 99–498, title IV, §401(a), Oct. 17, 1986, 100 Stat. 1345, related to awards ceremony.

A prior section 1070d–39, Pub. L. 89–329, title IV, §419I, as added Pub. L. 98–558, title VIII, §801(a), Oct. 30, 1984, 98 Stat. 2902, related to ceremony for awarding scholarships under Robert C. Byrd Honors Scholarship Program, prior to the general revision of this part by Pub. L. 99–498.
September 17, 2015

Mr. Jared Willard

Senior Video Producer

Springfield, Missouri, Public Information Office

840 Boonville Avenue

Springfield, MO 65801

Dear Mr. Willard:

This letter is to inform you that we are unable to process your petition for an exemption from 

part 21, subpart H, and §§ 45.23(b), 91.151, 91.405(a), 91.407(a)(1), 91.409(a)(1) and (2), and 

91.417(a) and (b) of Title 14, Code of Federal Regulations (14 CFR). It explains why we 

cannot process your request and what you should do in the next 30 days.

Why We Cannot Process Your Request

We posted your exemption request on behalf of the Springfield, Missouri, Public Information 

Office to Docket No. FAA−2015−2618 on July 6, 2015, but we are unable to process your 

request any further. Your petition does not comply with the requirements of § 11.81 (copy 

enclosed). For us to consider the request any further, you must send us all of the following:

 The reasons why granting the request would be in the public interest; that is, how it would 

benefit the public as a whole.

 Any additional information, views, or arguments available to support your request.

For more detailed information relating to submitting petitions for exemption, please visit 

http://aes.faa.gov/petition/index.html. This website helps the petitioner to meet Federal 

Aviation Administration (FAA) requirement outlines in § 11.81 and helps answer any 

questions you may have.

What You Should Do

If you want us to process your request any further, you must submit the requested information 

within 30 days. Please note that § 11.63(d) requires you to send your petition for exemption 

at least 120 days before the proposed effective date of the exemption. 
2

If We Do Not Hear From You

If we do not receive the information, we will close the docket without notifying you further. 

If you have any questions you may call the 333 Information Line (202) 267-2999.

Sincerely,

/s/

Brittany Newton

Program Analyst, Airmen and

Airspace Rules Division

Enclosures
3
4
(No. 74-CC-180

#### Office Equipment Co. of Chicago, Claimant, *vs.*State of Illinois, Department of Mental Health, Respondent.

*Opinion filed December 17, 1973.*

Office Equipment Co. of Chicago, Claimant, pro se.

William J. Scott, Attorney General; Edward L. S. Arkema, Jr., Assistant Attorney General, for Respondent.

Per Curiam.
USGSHomeContactUSGSSearchUSGS

Data Series 665

----

AccessibilityFOIAPrivacyPolicies and Notices

U.S. Department of the Interior |            U.S. Geological Survey                                                URL: http://pubs.usgs.gov/ds/665/html/collaborators.html            Page Contact Information: GS Pubs Web Contact                        Page Last Modified: Friday, February 10, 2012, 11:26:54 AM
EXHIBIT 8.1



         The following is a list of all of Koor Industries Ltd.'s significant
subsidiaries and affiliates as of December 31, 2004, including the name,
country of incorporation or residence, proportion of ownership interest and, if
different, proportion of voting power held.

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>

                                            Country of      Percentage of     Percentage of voting
                                         Incorporation or      ownership     power (if different from
                                             residence         interest             ownership)

<S>                                         <C>                  <C>               <C>
Name of Subsidiary
Koor Corporate Venture Capital               Israel             100.0%                   *
Elisra Electronic Systems Ltd.               Israel              70.0%                   *
Makhteshim-Agan Industries Ltd.              Israel             38.6%(1)                 *
Tadiran Communications Ltd.                  Israel             30.8%(2)                 *
ECI Telecom Ltd.                             Israel              30.2%                   *
Telrad Networks Ltd.                         Israel              80.5%                   *
ECtel Ltd.                                   Israel              12.9%                   *
Sheraton Moriah (Israel) Ltd.                Israel              55.0%                   *
Knafaim-Arkia Holdings Ltd.                  Israel               9.2%                   *
Koor Trade Ltd.                              Israel             100.0%                   *
</TABLE>

______________________
*    Not applicable.
(1)  As a result of the sale by Koor Industries Ltd. ("Koor") of 15.9 million
     shares of Makhteshim-Agan Industries Ltd. ("MA Industries") on February 3,
     2005 and the issuance of additional shares by MA Industries in the second
     quarter of 2005 upon the conversion of convertible debentures and the
     exercise of stock options including employee stock options, Koor's
     interest in MA Industries decreased to approximately 32.0% as of June 30,
     2005 (approximately 28.6% on a fully diluted basis taking into
     consideration the exercise of outstanding stock options and the conversion
     of outstanding convertible debentures).
(2)  Fully diluted, taking into consideration the exercise of outstanding stock
     options. As a result of Koor's sale of shares in April 2005, Koor's
     interest in Tadiran Communications Ltd. decreased to 18.6%.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

DAY

 10,371

 10,233

 10,072

 9,754

 9,456

 9,198

 8,989

 9,720

 10,504

 10,794

 10,729

 10,598

 10,371

 10,064

 9,783

 9,564

 9,313

 9,428

 9,160

 8,914

 8,726

 8,507

 8,477

 8,394

 8,507

 8,625

 8,746

 8,879

 9,002

 9,123

 54,834

 54,028

 53,921

 54,056

 54,177

 55,346

 54,384

 54,995

 55,285

 55,250

 55,365

 55,522

 55,771

 56,056

 56,284

 56,447

 56,609

 56,423

 56,592

 56,773

 56,926

 56,797

 56,109

 55,446

 54,545

 53,631

 52,746

 51,866

 50,974

 50,076

STORAGE - A.F. 

 65,205

 64,261

 63,993

 63,810

 63,633

 64,544

 63,373

 64,715

 65,789

 66,044

 66,094

 66,120

 66,142

 66,120

 66,067

 66,011

 65,922

 65,851

 65,752

 65,687

 65,652

 65,304

 64,586

 63,840

 63,052

 62,256

 61,492

 60,745

 59,976

 59,199

858

722

435

455

336

399

1,075

2,151

1,198

540

623

529

396

417

476

345

328

449

570

461

364

524

666

670

671

596

659

665

687

596

381

246

300

363

247

858

485

2,828

1,739

669

648

542

407

406

449

317

283

413

520

428

346

349

304

294

274

195

274

288

299

204

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

NOVEMBER 2002 FULL NATURAL FLOW AT NEW MELONES DAM RUN DATE: 12/19/2002

TOTALS -6,952 15,356

* October 1, 30,459

 15.6

 16.0

 16.6

 17.4

 17.9

 19.6

 20.5

 26.1

 29.6

 30.9

 32.2

 33.3

 34.1

 34.9

 35.8

 36.4

 37.0

 37.8

 38.8

 39.7

 40.3

 41.0

 41.6

 42.2

 42.8

 43.2

 43.7

 44.3

 44.9

 45.3

DONNELLS

RES

BEARDSLEY

RES

2002 TO DATE

NEW

MELONES

INFLOW

C.F.S

NATURAL

RIVER

C.F.S

ACCUM *

FULL

NATURAL

1000 A.F.

RESERVOIR

TOTAL

-946

-944

-268

-183

-177

+911

-1,171

+1,342

+1,074

+255

+50

+26

+22

-22

-53

-56

-89

-71

-99

-65

-35

-348

-718

-746

-788

-796

-764

-747

-769

-777

CHANGE

A.F. C.F.S.

-477

-476

-135

-92

-89

+459

-590

+677

+541

+129

+25

+13

+11

-11

-27

-28

-45

-36

-50

-33

-18

-175

-362

-376

-397

-401

-385

-377

-388

-392
Fw: revised chapter 6 of RIA for OMB 

 12/16/2011 06:10 PM 

 

From: RobertJ Wayland/RTP/USEPA/US 

 

To: Cortney_Higgins@omb.eop.gov 

 

Cc: Bill Maxwell/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA 

----- Forwarded by RobertJ Wayland/RTP/USEPA/US on 12/16/2011 06:10 PM 

----- 

From: Ron Evans/RTP/USEPA/US 

To: RobertJ Wayland/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA 

Cc: Al McGartland/DC/USEPA/US@EPA, Amanda CurryBrown/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA, 

DavidA Evans/DC/USEPA/US@EPA, Jim DeMocker/DC/USEPA/US@EPA, Lydia 

Wegman/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA, Alex Barron/DC/USEPA/US@EPA 

Date: 12/16/2011 06:08 PM 

Subject: revised chapter 6 of RIA for OMB 

Bob, this version is ready to send to OMB. Note for Cortney that 

section 

6.5 was totally revised per conversation and the redline did not make any 

sense. Thus, that section is presented clean for clarity of their 

reading. 

Ron Evans 

Leader, Air Economics Group 

HEID/OAQPS/OAR/EPA 

Mail Drop C-439-02 

919-541-5488 

919-541-0839 fax 

Chapter 6_EmploymentandEconomicImpacts_1216 arb 1640 clean 1755 OMB ready.docx
#### Bagdon John, as Administrator, etc., Respondent, v. Robert Scott and Others, Constituting the Copartnership of Scott Bros., Appellants

Appeal dismissed, without costs, upon stipulation filed.
(No. 7037

#### Dodge Trucks, Inc., Claimant, vs. State of Illinois, Department of Transportation, Respondent.

*Opinion filed June 5, 1974.*

Dodge Trucks, Inc., Claimant, pro se.

William J. Scott, Attorney General; Edward L. S. Arkema, Jr., Assistant Attorney General, for Respondent.

Per Curiam.
#### § 72.41 Re-appraisal of property involved in an allowed petition.

In determining the nature and extent of the relief to be afforded a petitioner pursuant to allowance of his petition, the value of the property or carrier involved in the allowed petition shall be considered to mean the value placed on said property or carrier pursuant to official appraisal thereof immediately following seizure: *Provided, however,* That if the petitioner desires an up-to-date re-appraisal made of the property or carrier, after notification as to the terms of allowance of the petition, and makes written request therefor, undertaking in said request to pay, or to be liable for, the total costs of such re-appraisal, the property or carrier shall be re-appraised officially in the same manner in which the original appraisal was made, and the terms and conditions of allowance shall stand modified to the extent required by such re-appraisal.
%l iUiUS-tf2..

'fi~^c^r'~Slr oA rA^^iM.

RECEIVED IN

-t^r^Mfl) /*/ /M/H_£_ iS fekl7^e Sc^goE

Mrl^jUS^^.

SA<l 1>}A>T r*/(_^>iLSf^L^^

JH /

i^-fucA_

<wp Auc/^

IJUCsGi.;.
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the
Annual Report of X-Rite, Incorporated, (the Company) on Form 10-K for the period ending January 2, 2010, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), the undersigned Chief Executive Officer and
Chief Financial Officer of the Company hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes Oxley Act of 2002 that based on their knowledge (1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and (2) the information contained in the Report fairly represents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company as of and
for the periods covered in the Report.



|                               |  |  |  |                      
|------------------------------ |  |  |  | ---------------------
|/S/    THOMAS J.
VACCHIANO JR. |  |  |  | /S/    RAJESH K.
SHAH
|Thomas J. Vacchiano Jr.        |  |  |  | Rajesh K. Shah       

March 18, 2010

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or
otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to X-Rite, Incorporated, and will be retained by X-Rite, Incorporated, and furnished
to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

The foregoing certification is being furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission as an exhibit to the Form 10-K and shall not be considered filed as part of the Form 10-K.