alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### In the Matter of the Application and Petition of John A. Bensel and Others, Constituting the Board of Water Supply of the City of New York, to Acquire Real Estate for and on Behalf of the City of New York, etc. (Northern Aqueduct, Section 6, Parcels 309 and 310.) Sigmund Stern and Others, Appellants; The City of New York, Respondent.

*Eminent domain*— *duties of commissioners*— *apportionment of award.*

Appeals by Sigmund Stern and others from an order of the Supreme Court, made at the Rockland Special Term and entered in the office of the clerk of the county of Putnam on the 8th day of May, 1913.

Per Curiam:

The order is right in purpose, but the commissioners rather than the court should correct then error. After the fourth sepa*925rate report, awarding $8,500 for the fee damage for the taking of parcels 309 and 310 and the confirmation of the same, the proceeding was returned to the commissioners to apportion that award between the two parcels. But in disregard of their earlier report and the direction of the court they apportioned $6,140 to parcel -309 and $3,360 to parcel 310, but stated that each sum was “ the sum ascertained and determined by us as aforesaid as and for the value of the equity, interest, right or title of the ” company in the land, and the parcels were stated to be subject severally to mortgages, one for $15,000 and the other for $13,000. This departure from the order and attempt, to make a new award was without authority, and was in plain contradiction of the award confirmed, and in violation of the order returning the matter to them. But the court at Special Term has done what it is the commissioners’ province to do, viz., make the report for apportionment, and as it was not empowered to do this the order appealed from should be reversed, without costs, and the proceeding returned to the commissioners to apportion the award between parcels 309 and 310 according to the fee value of each parcel, and to state what mortgages severally cover the parcels and by whom they are held. Jenks, P. J., Burr, Thomas, Carr and Stapleton, JJ., concurred. Order reversed, without costs, and proceeding returned to the commissioners to apportion the award between parcels 309 and 310 according to the fee value of each parcel, and to state what mortgages severally cover the parcels and by whom they are held.
###### Editorial Note on Part 41

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 41 (formerly part 275) appear at T.D. ATF-460, 66 FR 39093, July 27, 2001.

#### §§ 41.107-41.108 [Reserved]
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1996
<CASH>                                         393,173
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                               13,455,965
<ALLOWANCES>                                    24,324
<INVENTORY>                                  8,502,197
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            23,045,979
<PP&E>                                       4,141,082
<DEPRECIATION>                               1,890,996
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              28,571,335
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       13,368,157
<BONDS>                                      7,903,878
<COMMON>                                        51,767
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                  2,250,000
<OTHER-SE>                                   4,997,533
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                28,571,335
<SALES>                                    161,896,522
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                           161,896,522
<CGS>                                      126,673,081
<TOTAL-COSTS>                              158,004,330
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             840,572
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              3,051,620
<INCOME-TAX>                                 1,149,616
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          1,902,004
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 1,902,004
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .31
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .31
        

</TABLE>
Water Quality Standards Regulatory Revisions Rulemaking

MEMORANDUM TO RECORD SUBJECT: Meeting with ACWA and State members of State-EPA Roundtable DATE: Friday, August 8, 2014 TIME: 12:30 PM – 2:00 PM Participants: EPA – Sara Hisel-McCoy, Grace Robiou, Shari Barash, Gary Russo ACWA/States – Melissa McCoy (ACWA), Gerry Szal (Massachusetts), Alex Barron (Virginia), Jason Childress (Oklahoma), Tom Stiles (Kansas), Sarah Johnson (Colorado), Lindsay Patterson (Wyoming), Nancy Sonafrank (Alaska), Susan Braley (Washington) Summary of Meeting: State participants provided information and estimates on the costs/burden associated with the proposed rule.
##### 



Exhibit 32 CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 I, Robert W. Prokos, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Annual Report of HealthRenu Medical, Inc. on Form
10-KSB for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2004 fully complies with the requirements of Section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in such Form
10-KSB fairly presents in all material respects the financial condition and results of operations
of HealthRenu Medical, Inc. By: /s/ Robert W. ProkosName:
    Robert W. ProkosTitle:
    Chief Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer February 10, 2005
EXHIBIT 31.1

Rule 13a-14 Certification 

I, Michael J. Metzger, President of Capital Builders, Inc., certify that:

- I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of Capital Builders Development Properties II (the "Registrant").;

2. Based on my knowledge, this annual report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this annual report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this annual report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. The registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and have:

a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this annual report is being prepared;

b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting; and

5. The registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

- All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal controls over financial reporting which were reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial data; and 
- Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting. 

 

March 26, 2004

 

__________________________________________

Michael J. Metzger

President
[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 11 (Tuesday, January 18, 2011)]
[Notices]
[Pages 2918-2919]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2011-840]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY

U.S. Customs and Border Protection


Notice of Cancellation of Customs Broker Licenses Due to Death of 
the License Holder

AGENCY: U.S. Customs and Border Protection, U.S. Department of Homeland 
Security.

ACTION: General Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given that, pursuant to Title 19 of the Code 
of Federal Regulations at section 111.51(a), the following individual 
Customs broker license and any and all permits have been cancelled due 
to the death of the broker:

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                     Name                        License No.                       Port name
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Robert F. Barnes, Sr.........................           06332  Dallas/Fort Worth
Stephen W. Marlow............................           15469  Champlain
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



[[Page 2919]]

    Dated: January 4, 2011.
Daniel Baldwin,
Assistant Commissioner, Office of International Trade.
[FR Doc. 2011-840 Filed 1-14-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9111-14-P
###### Editorial Note on Part 478

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 478 appear by T.D. ATF-411, 64 FR 17291, Apr. 9, 1999, T.D. ATF-487, 68 FR 3750, Jan. 24, 2003, and ATF-11F, 73 FR 57240, Oct. 2, 2008.

#### § 478.43 License fee not refundable.

No refund of any part of the amount paid as a license fee shall be made where the operations of the licensee are, for any reason, discontinued during the period of an issued license. However, the license fee submitted with an application for a license shall be refunded if that application is denied or withdrawn by the applicant prior to being acted upon.

[T.D. ATF-270, 53 FR 10494, Mar. 31, 1988]
#### Alva F. Wallander, Respondent, v. Ralph Gillette, Appellant.

No opinion. Close, P. J., Carswell, Johnston, Adel and Taylor, JJ., concur.
Editorial Note on Part 70
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 70 appear by T.D. ATF-450, 66 FR 29022-29030, May 29, 2001.

§ 70.168 Redemption of property. ( a ) *Before sale.* Any person whose property has been levied upon shall have the right to pay the amount due, together with costs and expenses of the proceeding, if any, to the appropriate TTB officer at any time prior to the sale of the property. Upon such payment the appropriate TTB officer shall restore such property to the owner and all further proceedings in connection with the levy on such property shall cease from the time of such payment.
( b ) *Redemption of real estate after sale* — ( 1 ) *Period.* The owner of any real estate sold as provided in 26 U.S.C. 6335, the owner's heirs, executors, or administrators, or any person having any interest therein, or a lien thereon, or any person in their behalf, shall be permitted to redeem the property sold, or any particular tract of such property, at any time within 180 days after the sale thereof.
( 2 ) *Price.* Such property or tract of property may be redeemed upon payment to the purchaser, or in case the purchaser cannot be found in the county in which the property to be redeemed is situated, then to the appropriate TTB officer, for the use of the purchaser, the purchaser's heirs, or assigns, the amount paid by such purchaser and interest thereon at the rate of 20 percent per annum. In case real and personal property (or several tracts of real property) are purchased in the aggregate, the redemption price of the real property (or of each of the several tracts) shall be determined on the basis of the ratio, as of the time of sale, of the value of the real property (or tract) to the value of the total property purchased. For this purpose the minimum price or the highest bid price, whichever is higher, offered for the property separately or in groups shall be treated as the value.
( c ) *Record.* When any real property is redeemed, the appropriate TTB officer must cause entry of the fact to be made upon the record of sale kept in accordance with 26 U.S.C. 6340 and § 70.187 of this part, and such entry is evidence of such redemption. The party who redeems the property must notify the appropriate TTB officer of the date of such redemption and of the transfer of the certificate of sale, the amount of the redemption price, and the name of the party to whom such redemption price was paid.
(26 U.S.C. 6337)
[T.D. ATF-6, 38 FR 32445, Nov. 26, 1973, as amended by T.D. ATF-450, 66 FR 29026, May 29, 2001]
(No. 6935

#### National Cash Register Company, Claimant, *vs.*State of Illinois, Secretary of State, Respondent.

*Opinion filed April 11, 1973.*

National Cash Register Company, Claimant, pro se.

William J. Scott, Attorney General; William E. Webber, Assistant Attorney General, for Respondent.

Per Curiam.
<PAGE>


                                                                    Exhibit 23.1

             CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT CERTIFIED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS

     We have issued our reports dated January 23, 1998, accompanying the
financial statements and schedule included in the Annual Report of The
Sportsman's Guide, Inc. on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 28,
1997.  We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference of said reports in
the Registration Statements of The Sportsman's Guide, Inc. on Forms S-8 (File
No. 333-26311, effective May 1, 1997, File No. 333-26313, effective May 1, 1997,
File No. 333-26315, effective May 1, 1997, File No. 333-26317, effective May 1,
1997 and File No. 333-39765, effective November 7, 1997).




Minneapolis, Minnesota
March 5, 1998
###### Editorial Note on Part 478

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 478 appear by T.D. ATF-411, 64 FR 17291, Apr. 9, 1999, T.D. ATF-487, 68 FR 3750, Jan. 24, 2003, and ATF-11F, 73 FR 57240, Oct. 2, 2008.

#### § 478.91 Posting of license.

Any license issued under this part shall be kept posted and kept available for inspection on the premises covered by the license.
EXHIBIT 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION
1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO 
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Michael M.
Vehlies, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Quarterly Report of
Zygo Corporation on Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarter ended September 30, 2010,
as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report), fully
complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in the Report fairly
presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
operations of Zygo Corporation.

A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to
Zygo Corporation and will be retained by Zygo Corporation and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

| |                                                    | 
| | -------------------------------------------------- | 
| | Dated:
 November 9, 2010                           | 
| |                                                    | 
| | /s/ Michael
 M. Vehlies                            | 
| |                                                    | 
| | Michael M.
 Vehlies                                | 
| | Corporate
 Controller                              | 
| | (principal
 financial officer) of Zygo Corporation
| |                                                    | 

---
#### Merchants Sales Co., Inc., Appellant, v. Suzanne Processed Oil Co., Defendant. Stabile Bank & Trust Co., Respondent.

Appeal by plaintiff from an order vacating the service of a warrant of attachment, and the levy thereunder, upon respondent’s interest in a bill of lading. Order affirmed, with $10 costs and disbursements. No opinion. Lewis, P. J., Johnston, Adel, Sneed and Wenzel, JJ., concur.
#### § 7.221 Criminal penalties.

A violation of the labeling provisions of 27 U.S.C. 205(e) is punishable as a misdemeanor. See 27 U.S.C. 207 for the statutory provisions relating to criminal penalties, consent decrees, and injunctions.
###### Editorial Note on Part 70

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 70 appear by T.D. ATF-450, 66 FR 29022-29030, May 29, 2001.

#### § 70.450 Seizure and forfeiture of personal property.

Part 72 of title 27 CFR contains the regulations relative to the personal property seized by officers of the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco and Firearms as subject to forfeiture as being used, or intended to be used, to violate certain Federal laws; the remission or mitigation of such forfeiture; and the administrative sale or other disposition, pursuant to forfeiture, of such seized property other than firearms seized under the National Firearms Act and firearms and ammunition seized under Title I of the Gun Control Act of 1968, as amended. For disposal of firearms under the National Firearms Act, see 26 U.S.C. 5872(b). For disposal of firearms and ammunition under Title I of the Gun Control Act of 1968, see 18 U.S.C. 924(d). For disposal of explosives under Title XI of Organized Crime Control Act of 1970, see 18 U.S.C. 844(c).
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

DAY ELEV

 416.66

 416.50

 416.36

 416.25

 416.02

 415.95

 415.82

 415.70

 415.47

 415.26

 415.05

 414.81

 414.56

 414.38

 414.11

 413.83

 413.45

 413.12

 412.84

 412.56

 412.30

 412.02

 411.77

 411.46

 411.27

 410.94

 410.83

 410.69

 410.45

 410.24

 501.1

 499.8

 498.7

 497.8

 496.0

 495.4

 494.4

 493.5

 491.7

 490.0

 488.4

 486.5

 484.5

 483.1

 481.0

 478.9

 476.0

 473.4

 471.3

 469.1

 467.1

 465.0

 463.1

 460.8

 459.3

 456.8

 456.0

 455.0

 453.2

 451.6

STORAGE

-1.7

-1.3

-1.1

-0.9

-1.8

-0.6

-1.0

-0.9

-1.8

-1.6

-1.6

-1.9

-1.9

-1.4

-2.1

-2.2

-2.9

-2.5

-2.1

-2.1

-2.0

-2.1

-1.9

-2.3

-1.4

-2.5

-0.8

-1.0

-1.8

-1.6

CHANGE

1,409

1,476

1,839

1,860

1,242

1,967

1,779

1,837

1,369

1,308

1,363

1,524

1,320

1,603

1,235

988

866

882

810

902

1,012

1,059

1,104

868

1,100

1,021

1,669

1,447

1,179

1,198

INFLOW

 1,950

 1,832

 2,104

 2,011

 1,861

 1,965

 1,989

 2,012

 1,961

 1,816

 1,905

 2,145

 1,981

 1,984

 1,966

 1,750

 2,018

 1,882

 1,646

 1,728

 1,769

 1,888

 1,815

 1,803

 1,586

 2,041

 1,847

 1,722

 1,825

 1,729

POWER

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

SPILL

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

OUTLET

 239

 248

 244

 233

 242

 243

 249

 247

 258

 268

 239

 272

 268

 270

 273

 275

 264

 228

 195

 202

 202

 202

 196

 198

 195

 195

 197

 205

 204

 206

PUMPING

 59

 35

 51

 56

 58

 37

 56

 53

 61

 55

 50

 50

 52

 55

 55

 55

 60

 54

 51

 49

 41

 46

 46

 48

 43

 40

 40

 48

 55

 55

C.F.S.

 .22

 .13

 .19

 .21

 .22

 .14

 .21

 .20

 .23

 .21

 .19

 .19

 .20

 .21

 .21

 .21

 .23

 .21

 .20

 .19

 .16

 .18

 .18

 .19

 .17

 .16

 .16

 .19

 .22

 .22

INCHES

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

PRECIP

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

SEPTEMBER 2012 FOLSOM LAKE DAILY OPERATIONS RUN DATE: October 3, 2013

IN LAKE

EVAPORATION

INCHES

C.F.S. PLANT

COMPUTED*

1000 ACRE-FEET

RELEASE - C.F.S. 

 RIVER 

TOTALS -50.8 39,236 56,531 0 0 6,957 1,514 5.83 .00

ACRE-FEET -50,800 77,825 112,129 0 0 13,799 3,003

COMMENTS:

* COMPUTED INFLOW IS THE SUM OF CHANGE IN STORAGE, RELEASES, PUMPING AND EVAPORATION.

SUMMARY

RELEASE (ACRE-FEET)

POWER 112,129

SPILL

PUMPING PLANT

 0

 13,799

TOTAL 125,928

PRECIPITATION

THIS MONTH =

JULY 1, 2012 TO DATE = .00

 502.7

OUTLET 0 .00
EXHIBIT 12(b)

PACCAR FINANCIAL CORP. - FORM 10-Q

COMPUTATION OF RATIO OF EARNINGS
TO FIXED CHARGES

PURSUANT TO THE SUPPORT AGREEMENT

BETWEEN THE COMPANY AND PACCAR

(Millions of Dollars)



|                                   |  |                            |       |  |      |   |       | 
|---------------------------------- |  | -------------------------- | ----- |  | ---- | - | ----- | 
|                                   |  | Three months endedMarch 31 |      
|                                   |  | 2011                       |       |  | 2010 |  
|FIXED CHARGES                      |  |                            |       |  |      |   |       | 
|Interest expense                   |  | $                          | 16.8  |  |      | $ | 24.9  | 
|Facility and equipment rental      |  |                            | .5    |  |      |   | .5    | 
|                                   |  |                            |       |  |      |   |       | 
|                                   |  |                            |       |  |      |   |       | 
|TOTAL FIXED CHARGES                |  | $                          | 17.3  |  |      | $ | 25.4  | 
|                                   |  |                            |       |  |      |   |       | 
|                                   |  |                            |       |  |      |   |       | 
|EARNINGS                           |  |                            |       |  |      |   |       | 
|Income before taxes                |  | $                          | 23.5  |  |      | $ | 8.0   | 
|Depreciation                       |  |                            | 32.5  |  |      |   | 37.7  | 
|                                   |  |                            |       |  |      |   |       | 
|                                   |  |                            | 56.0  |  |      |   | 45.7  | 
|                                   |  |                            |       |  |      |   |       | 
|FIXED CHARGES                      |  |                            | 17.3  |  |      |   | 25.4  | 
|                                   |  |                            |       |  |      |   |       | 
|                                   |  |                            |       |  |      |   |       | 
|EARNINGS AS DEFINED                |  | $                          | 73.3  |  |      | $ | 71.1  | 
|                                   |  |                            |       |  |      |   |       | 
|                                   |  |                            |       |  |      |   |       | 
|RATIO OF EARNINGS TO FIXED CHARGES |  |                            | 4.24X |  |      |   | 2.80X | 
|                                   |  |                            |       |  |      |   |       |