alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Editorial Note on Part 70
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 70 appear by T.D. ATF-450, 66 FR 29022-29030, May 29, 2001.

§ 70.71 Assessment authority. The appropriate TTB officers are authorized and required to make all inquiries necessary to the determination and assessment of all taxes imposed under the provisions of 26 U.S.C. enforced and administered by the Bureau. The appropriate TTB officers are further authorized and required to make the determinations and the assessments of such taxes. The term “taxes” includes interest, additional amounts, additions to the taxes, and assessable penalties. The authority of the appropriate TTB officers to make assessment includes the following: ( a ) *Taxes shown on return.* The appropriate TTB officer shall assess all taxes determined by the taxpayer or by the appropriate TTB officer and disclosed on a return or list.
( b ) *Unpaid taxes payable by stamp.* ( 1 ) If without use of the proper stamp: ( i ) Any article upon which a tax is required to be paid by means of a stamp is sold or removed for sale or use by the manufacturer thereof, or
( ii ) Any transaction or act upon which a tax is required to be paid by means of a stamp occurs, the appropriate TTB officer, upon such information as can be obtained, must estimate the amount of the tax which has not been paid and the appropriate TTB officer must make assessment therefor upon the person the appropriate TTB officer determines to be liable for the tax. However, the appropriate TTB officer may not assess any tax which is payable by stamp unless the taxpayer fails to pay such tax at the time and in the manner provided by law or regulations.
( 2 ) If a taxpayer gives a check or money order as a payment for stamps but the check or money order is not paid upon presentment, then the appropriate TTB officer shall assess the amount of the check or money order against the taxpayer as if it were a tax due at the time the check or money order was received by appropriate TTB officer.
(26 U.S.C. 6201)
[T.D. ATF-301, 55 FR 47611, Nov. 14, 1990]
IPM Files -- MATS Policy Case: 6 of 6 12/09/2011 04:48 PM From: Erich Eschmann/DC/USEPA/US Sort List...

To: Cortney_Higgins@omb.eop.gov

Cc: RobertJ Wayland/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA, Bill Maxwell/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA, Kevin Culligan/DC/USEPA/US@EPA, Sam Napolitano/DC/USEPA/US@EPA, Jeb Stenhouse/DC/USEPA/US@EPA, Mikhail Adamantiades/DC/USEPA/US@EPA

Erich Eschmann Clean Air Markets Division U.S. EPA, Office of Air and Radiation

202 343-9128 Phone

202 343-2359 Fax eschmann.erich@epa.gov

ParsedFile_MATS_Policy_Case_2015.zip
Electronically FiledIntermediate Court of AppealsCAAP-10-000010928-MAR-201309:58 AM
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 06-7752

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee,
versus CALVIN RICO ROSEMOND, Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Greenville. Henry M. Herlong, Jr., District Judge. (6:02-cr-00435-HMH; 6:06-cv-02741-HMH)
Submitted: December 21, 2006 Decided: January 5, 2007 Before NIEMEYER, WILLIAMS, and KING, Circuit Judges. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Calvin Rico Rosemond, Appellant Pro Se. Regan Alexandra Pendleton, Assistant United States Attorney, Greenville, South Carolina, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.- 3 - PER CURIAM: Calvin Rico Rosemond seeks to appeal the district court’s order treating his “Request to Reopen Judgment” as a Fed. R. Civ. P. 60(b) motion and dismissing it as a successive 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (2000) motion. The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1) (2000); Reid v. Angelone , 369 F.3d 363, 369 (4th Cir. 2004). A certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2000). A prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that any assessment of the constitutional claims by the district court is debatable or wrong and that any dispositive procedural ruling by the district court is likewise debatable. Miller-El v. Cockrell , 537 U.S. 322, 336-38 (2003); Slack v. McDaniel , 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000); Rose v. Lee , 252 F.3d 676, 683-84 (4th Cir. 2001). We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Rosemond has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny Rosemond’s motion for a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. Additionally, we construe Rosemond’s notice of appeal and informal brief as an application to file a second or successive motion under 28 U.S.C. § 2255. United States v. Winestock, 340 F.3d 200, 208 (4th Cir. 2003). In order to obtain authorization to file a successive § 2255 motion, a prisoner must assert claims- 3 - based on either: (1) a new rule of constitutional law, previously unavailable, made retroactive by the Supreme Court to cases on collateral review; or (2) newly discovered evidence, not previously discoverable by due diligence, that would be sufficient to establish by clear and convincing evidence that, but for constitutional error, no reasonable factfinder would have found the movant guilty of the offense. 28 U.S.C. §§ 2244(b)(2), 2255 (2000). Rosemond’s claims do not satisfy either of these criteria. Therefore, we deny authorization to file a successive § 2255 motion. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY ELEV

 122.44

 122.74

 122.98

 123.06

 123.16

 123.29

 122.82

 122.63

 122.83

 122.43

 123.16

 123.07

 122.90

 122.61

 122.97

 122.76

 122.64

 123.46

 122.98

 123.40

 122.28

 124.21

 122.80

 121.30

 121.29

 122.41

 122.82

 123.19

 123.72

 122.82

 123.45

 7,539

 7,674

 7,782

 7,819

 7,866

 7,927

 7,710

 7,625

 7,715

 7,535

 7,866

 7,824

 7,746

 7,616

 7,778

 7,683

 7,629

 8,007

 7,782

 7,979

 7,467

 8,366

 7,701

 7,047

 7,043

 7,526

 7,710

 7,880

 8,129

 7,710

 8,003

STORAGE

-294

+135

+108

+37

+47

+61

-217

-85

+90

-180

+331

-42

-78

-130

+162

-95

-54

+378

-225

+197

-512

+899

-665

-654

-4

+483

+184

+170

+249

-419

+293

CHANGE

12,540

12,911

13,026

13,075

13,073

13,116

12,870

12,936

13,034

12,886

12,919

11,802

11,166

11,131

11,301

11,147

11,132

11,351

11,125

11,303

10,890

10,366

7,450

6,689

6,404

5,928

5,043

5,015

5,188

4,892

5,126

INFLOW

 2,480

 4,985

 4,971

 4,981

 4,955

 4,975

 4,878

 4,989

 4,972

 4,997

 4,953

 4,903

 4,967

 5,008

 5,016

 4,988

 4,999

 4,925

 4,992

 4,972

 4,785

 4,353

 3,932

 3,928

 3,924

 4,963

 4,827

 4,308

 4,371

 4,418

 3,963

POWER

 10,100

 7,750

 7,893

 7,967

 7,986

 7,998

 7,988

 7,877

 7,906

 7,872

 7,692

 6,815

 6,124

 6,064

 6,074

 6,079

 6,036

 6,111

 6,123

 6,109

 6,240

 5,439

 3,731

 2,968

 2,359

 597

 0

 498

 567

 561

 891

SPILL

 60

 60

 60

 60

 60

 60

 60

 60

 60

 60

 60

 60

 60

 60

 60

 60

 60

 60

 60

 60

 60

 60

 60

 60

 60

 60

 60

 60

 60

 60

 60

HATCHERY

 3

 3

 3

 3

 2

 3

 3

 3

 2

 3

 3

 4

 4

 4

 4

 4

 4

 4

 3

 3

 3

 1

 2

 3

 3

 4

 3

 3

 4

 4

 4

C.F.S.

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

MAY 2006 LAKE NATOMA DAILY OPERATIONS RUN DATE: August 10, 2006

IN LAKE

EVAP

C.F.S.

COMPUTED*

ACRE-FEET

RELEASE - C.F.S.

TOTALS +170 316,835 144,678 168,415 1,860 99

ACRE-FEET +170 628,442 286,969 334,051 3,689 196

COMMENTS:

* COMPUTED INFLOW IS THE SUM OF CHANGE IN STORAGE, RELEASES AND EVAPORATION.

SUMMARY

RELEASES (ACRE-FEET)

POWER 286,969

SPILL 334,051

FOLSOM SOUTH CANAL

HATCHERY

 3,360

 3,689

 7,833

FOLSOM

SOUTH 

 45

 45

 45

 45

 46

 49

 50

 50

 49

 45

 44

 41

 50

 61

 65

 64

 60

 60

 60

 60

 60

 60

 60

 60

 60

 60

 60

 60

 60

 60

 60

 1,694

 3,360

(1)

(1) INCHES OF EVAPORATION TAKEN FROM FOLSOM PAN.

RELEASES (ACRE-FEET) 

TOTAL 628,069

Table 12
### §9405. Coordination of Federal programs

#### (a) Coordination

The Secretary and the Secretary of Education shall develop mechanisms to resolve administrative and programmatic conflicts between Federal programs that would be a barrier to parents, caregivers, service providers, or children related to the coordination of services and funding for early learning programs.

#### (b) Use of equipment and supplies

In the case of a collaborative activity funded under this chapter and another provision of law providing for Federal child care or early learning programs, the use of equipment and nonconsumable supplies purchased with funds made available under this chapter or such provision shall not be restricted to children enrolled or otherwise participating in the program carried out under this chapter or such provision, during a period in which the activity is predominately funded under this chapter or such provision.

(Pub. L. 106–554, §1(a)(1) [title VIII, §806], Dec. 21, 2000, 114 Stat. 2763, 2763A–82.)
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

DAY

 62,543

 62,989

 63,057

 63,048

 63,061

 63,262

 63,468

 63,498

 63,703

 63,540

 63,309

 63,059

 63,094

 63,006

 63,279

 63,296

 63,401

 63,384

 63,519

 63,540

 63,615

 63,745

 63,737

 63,561

 63,317

 63,124

 63,061

 63,082

 63,094

 63,057

 40,390

 40,718

 41,386

 42,048

 42,713

 43,143

 43,579

 44,187

 44,526

 45,334

 45,951

 46,560

 46,800

 47,111

 46,980

 47,095

 46,980

 47,040

 46,871

 48,816

 46,680

 46,498

 46,435

 46,565

 46,691

 46,811

 46,783

 46,647

 46,495

 46,467

STORAGE - A.F. 

 102,933

 103,707

 104,443

 105,096

 105,774

 106,405

 107,047

 107,685

 108,229

 108,874

 109,260

 109,619

 109,894

 110,117

 110,259

 110,391

 110,381

 110,424

 110,390

 112,356

 110,295

 110,243

 110,172

 110,126

 110,008

 109,935

 109,844

 109,729

 109,589

 109,524

425

376

389

448

452

297

549

595

604

409

386

342

301

427

301

272

326

429

401

416

362

290

510

374

286

374

382

418

372

395

785

-585

760

777

794

615

873

917

878

734

581

523

440

539

373

339

321

451

384

1,407

-677

264

474

351

-526

337

336

360

301

362

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

JUNE 2014 FULL NATURAL FLOW AT NEW MELONES DAM RUN DATE: 08/15/2014

TOTALS +7,306 13,488

* October 1, 26,753

 278.9

 277.7

 279.2

 280.8

 282.3

 283.6

 285.3

 287.1

 288.9

 290.3

 291.5

 292.5

 293.4

 294.4

 295.2

 295.9

 296.5

 297.4

 298.2

 300.9

 299.6

 300.1

 301.1

 301.8

 300.7

 301.4

 302.1

 302.8

 303.4

 304.1

DONNELLS

RES

BEARDSLEY

RES

2013 TO DATE

NEW

MELONES

INFLOW

C.F.S

NATURAL

RIVER

C.F.S

ACCUM *

FULL

NATURAL

1000 A.F.

RESERVOIR

TOTAL

+715

+774

+736

+653

+678

+631

+642

+638

+544

+645

+386

+359

+275

+223

+142

+132

-10

+43

-34

+1,966

-2,061

-52

-71

-46

-118

-73

-91

-115

-140

-65

CHANGE

A.F. C.F.S.

+360

+390

+371

+329

+342

+318

+324

+322

+274

+325

+195

+181

+139

+112

+72

+67

-5

+22

-17

+991

-1,039

-26

-36

-23

-59

-37

-46

-58

-71

-33
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

DAY ELEV

 223.02

 222.86

 223.30

 223.55

 223.67

 224.20

 224.01

 223.49

 223.22

 222.80

 222.66

 222.95

 222.35

 221.74

 220.73

 219.91

 219.61

 219.43

 219.98

 220.98

 221.45

 221.99

 222.52

 222.52

 222.24

 222.09

 222.09

 222.00

 221.51

 221.15

 51,100

 50,673

 51,848

 52,518

 52,840

 54,266

 53,754

 52,357

 51,634

 50,513

 50,139

 50,913

 49,314

 47,703

 45,054

 42,919

 42,145

 41,682

 43,100

 45,708

 46,941

 48,360

 49,767

 49,767

 49,022

 48,624

 48,624

 48,385

 47,099

 46,154

STORAGE

-1,042

-427

+1,175

+670

+322

+1,426

-512

-1,397

-723

-1,121

-374

+774

-1,599

-1,611

-2,649

-2,135

-774

-463

+1,418

+2,608

+1,233

+1,419

+1,407

+0

-745

-398

+0

-239

-1,286

-945

CHANGE

1,045

1,140

1,584

1,598

1,530

1,637

1,395

1,280

1,439

1,648

1,912

1,851

1,656

1,238

1,087

1,399

1,751

1,902

1,621

1,310

1,202

1,115

1,224

1,224

1,303

1,407

1,581

1,547

1,393

1,449

PUMPING

 8,365

 9,797

 9,228

 7,633

 7,943

 8,237

 8,341

 8,484

 8,313

 6,935

 7,172

 6,685

 7,240

 6,897

 7,369

 7,292

 6,925

 6,868

 6,864

 6,524

 7,140

 6,993

 7,074

 6,191

 6,697

 6,576

 6,417

 6,439

 6,808

 6,953

PUMPING

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 789

 0

 0

 1,701

 1,700

 1,700

 1,700

 1,685

 1,677

 1,665

 1,660

 1,650

 481

 0

 0

 0

 0

 1,680

 1,680

 1,688

 1,670

 1,670

 1,662

 1,660

PUMPING

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 24

 72

 12

GEN.

*

+303

+67

-18

+48

+139

-38

+64

-28

+181

+146

+141

+139

+188

+135

+147

+201

+206

+90

+95

+114

+156

+180

+163

+210

+185

+141

+106

+99

+80

+356

OR

UNITED STATES 

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION

CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT

CONSOLIDATED STATE-FEDERAL O'NEILL FOREBAY October 1, 2011

DAILY OPERATIONS

SEPTEMBER 2011 RUN DATE:

IN LAKE GEN.

ACRE-FEET O'NEILL

RELEASE - C.F.S. 

TOTALS -5,988 43,468 108 28,118 220,400 +3,996

ACRE-FEET -5,988 86,219 214 55,772 437,163

SUMMARY

 0

RELEASE (ACRE-FEET)

O'NEILL GEN. 214

SAN LUIS PUMP 55,772 0

 52,142

DOS AMIGOS PUMP 437,163

DELIVERIES 

S. LUIS O'NEILL

 0

 1,910

 1,910

 0

 0

 1,029

 950

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 5,799

 11,502

CALIF. DOS AMIGOS

AQUEDUCT

6,492

6,465

6,345

6,325

6,436

6,328

6,463

6,528

6,328

6,276

6,630

6,785

6,290

6,398

6,475

6,281

6,237

6,293

6,344

6,415

6,404

6,413

6,396

6,437

6,514

6,516

6,400

6,366

6,420

6,343

 192,343

 381,512

S. LUIS

DELIV.

GAINS(+)

LOSS(-)

C.F.S.

INFLOW - C.F.S

STATE OF CALIFORNIA

THE RESOURCES AGENCY

DEPARTMENT OF WATER RESOURCES

STATE WATER PROJECT

TOTAL 493,149

 7,926

* DAILY DEL. FIGURES UNAVAILABLE. TOT. DEL. IS INCLUDED IN COMPUTING MONTHLY TOTALS
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM FIRECOM,
INC.'S CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET, STATEMENT OF INCOME AND STATEMENT OF CASH
FLOW FOR THE PERIOD ENDED JANUARY 31, 2000, AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY
REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER>                                     1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          APR-30-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               JAN-31-2000
<CASH>                                           4,299
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    4,765
<ALLOWANCES>                                       660
<INVENTORY>                                      1,891
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                11,286
<PP&E>                                           1,716
<DEPRECIATION>                                   1,101
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  11,955
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            4,060
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           133
<OTHER-SE>                                       6,590
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    11,955
<SALES>                                         14,160
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                14,160
<CGS>                                            8,667
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    8,667
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 3,853
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   226
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 142
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  1,272
<INCOME-TAX>                                       599
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                673
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       673
<EPS-BASIC>                                        .06
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .06



</TABLE>
###### Editorial Note on Part 27

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 27 appear by T.D. ATF-474, 67 FR 11231, Mar. 13, 2002, and T.D. ATF-479, 67 FR 30799, May 8, 2002.

#### § 27.58 Containers of 1 gallon (3.785 liters) or less.

Labels on imported containers of distilled spirits, and on containers of imported distilled spirits bottled in customs custody, for sale at retail, are required to be covered by a certificate of label approval TTB Form 5100.31 issued pursuant to part 5 of this chapter. Containers of imported distilled spirits bottled after taxpayment and withdrawal from customs custody are required to be covered by a certificate of label approval or a certificate of exemption from label approval TTB Form 5100.31 issued pursuant to part 5 of this chapter. When distilled spirits are to be labeled under a certificate of exemption from label approval, the labels affixed to containers are required to conform to the provisions of part 19 of this chapter.

[T.D. 6954, 33 FR 6818, May 4, 1968. Redesignated at 40 FR 16835, Apr. 15, 1975]

###### Editorial Note

#### Editorial Note:

For Federal Register citations affecting § 27.58, see the List of CFR Sections Affected, which appears in the Finding Aids section of the printed volume and at *www.govinfo.gov.*
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

DAY HIGH

 604

 609

 599

 569

 590

 551

 542

 527

 577

 566

 527

 563

 565

 606

 646

 659

 687

 656

 645

 702

 615

 608

 571

 540

 563

 552

 554

 548

 554

 558

 429

 407

 421

 435

 443

 447

 439

 418

 424

 424

 403

 425

 488

 514

 497

 509

 475

 464

 466

 485

 437

 452

 482

 482

 482

 496

 510

 505

 500

 490

 489

 477

 473

 477

 482

 489

 494

 487

 499

 491

 490

 519

 528

 545

 537

 544

 534

 530

 528

 539

 529

 529

 523

 520

 527

 524

 533

 530

 524

 521

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

SEPTEMBER 2009 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: October 2, 2009

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

DELTA MENDOTA CANAL AT CHECK 13 (O'NEILL)
USGSHomeContactUSGSSearchUSGS

Data Series 638

----

AccessibilityFOIAPrivacyPolicies and Notices

U.S. Department of the Interior |            U.S. Geological Survey                                                URL: http://pubs.usgs.gov/ds/638/html/acronyms.html            Page Contact Information: GS Pubs Web Contact                        Page Last Modified: Friday, October 28, 2011, 09:12:28 AM         

----
EXHIBIT
32.1





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION
1350


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906


OF
THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002








In
connection with the Annual Report of China Runji Cement Inc. (the "Company") for
the year ended August 31, 2009, as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Shouren Zhao, Chairman and
Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section
1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:








1.
            The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
and





2.
            The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company
      on the dates and for the periods
presented.








Date:
      November 25, 2009
              By:
      /s/Shouren
      Zhao
                Shouren
      Zhao
                Chairman
      and Chief Executive Officer
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Vernal K. KILLINGS, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 05-50173

Conference Calendar.

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.

June 21, 2006.

Joseph H. Gay, Jr., Assistant U.S. Attorney, U.S. Attorney’s Office Western District of Texas, San Antonio, TX, for Plaintiff-Appellee.

Brian C. Southwell, Minneapolis, MN, for Defendant-Appellant.

Before STEWART, DENNIS, and OWEN, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: *

Vernal K. Killings appeals the sentence imposed following his plea of guilty to conspiracy to distribute marijuana. He argues that this court should vacate his sentence because the record demonstrates ineffective assistance of counsel at sentencing.

In general, claims of ineffective assistance will not be considered on direct appeal when the claims were not raised in the district court because there has been no opportunity to develop record evidence on the merits of the claim. *United States v. Lampazianie,*251 F.3d 519, 527 (5th Cir.2001). Thus, when the record does not contain information regarding the tactical motivations behind counsel’s actions or information regarding how the alleged errors influenced the result of the trial, this court has declined to address an ineffective assistance issue on appeal. *See United States v. Mariar-Martinez,*143 F.3d 914, 916 (5th Cir.1998). Because we find the record insufficient for review of Killings’s claims, we affirm the judgment of the district court without prejudice to Killings’s right to raise his claims in a motion to vacate, set aside, or correct sentence pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2255. *Id.*at 918-19.

AFFIRMED.

*

 Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.