alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
A-AA+Skip to content

                  - Home
                  - Compendium Statistics
                  - Event
                  - Archives
                  - Glossary
                  - Help
                  - Contact
                  - Research on Disability

Annual Disability Statistics Compendium

              - Home /
              - Archives /
              - 2012 Compendium Statistics /
              - 2012 Medicaid and Medicare /
              - 2012 10.5 Medicaid—Change in Percent of Total Beneficiaries with Disabilities

## Table 10.5: Medicaid—Change in Percent[1] of Total Beneficiaries with Disabilities: Fiscal Year 2008 to Fiscal Year 2009

----

----

 

----

#### 2012 Disability Compendium

                        - Home
                        - Compendium Statistics                           - Population and Prevelance
                          - Employment
                          - Time Trend Population Statistics
                          - Poverty
                          - Earnings
                          - Veterans
                          - Health Insurance Coverage
                          - Health
                          - Social Security Administration Programs
                          - Medicaid and Medicare
                          - Special Education
                          - Vocational Rehabilitation
                          - Federal Government Spending and Employment
                          - International Disability Statistics
                          - Population Statistics: Disability Type
                        - Event
                        - Archives                           - 2012 Compendium Statistics
                        - Glossary
                        - Help
                        - Contact
                        - Research on Disability

#### Funding for this project is made possible by:

 The Research and Training Center on Disability Statistics and Demographics (StatsRRTC), which is funded by the U.S. Department of Education, National Institute for Disability and Rehabilitation Research, under cooperative agreements H133B080012.

#### Stay Connected

**Institute on Disability**10 West Edge Drive, Suite 101Durham, NH 03824603.862.4320 | relay: 711 | [email protected]www.iod.unh.edu

© 2013. Institute on Disability.University of New Hampshire.
§ 9.164 River Junction. ( a ) *Name.* The name of the viticultural area described in this section is “River Junction.”
( b ) *Approved maps.* The appropriate maps for determining the boundaries of the River Junction viticultural area are the following two 1:24,000 Scale U.S.G.S. topographical maps. They are titled: ( 1 ) Ripon, CA 1969, photorevised 1980;
( 2 ) Vernalis, CA 1969, photorevised 1980.
( c ) *Boundaries.* The River Junction AVA is located in southern San Joaquin County, California. The boundaries are as follows: ( 1 ) Beginning on the Vernalis, CA quadrangle map at the intersection of the secondary highway Airport Way and the San Joaquin River levee, near Benchmark 35 in T3S/R6E;
( 2 ) Then in a southeasterly direction, follow the levee along the San Joaquin River onto the Ripon, CA quadrangle map;
( 3 ) Then in a northerly direction around Sturgeon Bend in section 18 T3S/R7E;
( 4 ) Then continuing in a generally southeasterly, then northeasterly direction along the levee adjoining the Stanislaus River through sections 19, 20 and 17 to the point where the levee intersects sections 17 and 8;
( 5 ) Then continuing in a northerly direction along the levee in section 8 for approximately 1,000 feet;
( 6 ) Then in a straight line in a northwesterly direction for approximately 100 feet to the intersection with Division Road;
( 7 ) Then in a southwesterly, then northwesterly direction along Division Road through sections 8, 17, 18 and 7 to the intersection with the secondary highway Airport Way;
( 8 ) Then in a southwesterly direction along Airport Way onto the Vernalis quadrangle map to the starting point at the intersection of Airport Way and the San Joaquin River levee T3S/R6E.
[T.D. ATF-452, 66 FR 23592, May 9, 2001]
### §1103f. Penalties

Whoever, being an officer, director, agent, or employee of, or connected in any capacity with, any recipient of Federal financial assistance or grant pursuant to this subchapter embezzles, willfully misapplies, steals, or obtains by fraud any of the funds that are the subject of such grant or assistance, shall be fined not more than $10,000 or imprisoned for not more than 2 years, or both.

(Pub. L. 89–329, title V, §527, formerly §517, as added Pub. L. 105–244, title V, §501, Oct. 7, 1998, 112 Stat. 1774; renumbered §527, Pub. L. 110–315, title V, §502(a)(2), Aug. 14, 2008, 122 Stat. 3331.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Prior Provisions

A prior section 1103f, Pub. L. 89–329, title V, §517, as added Pub. L. 102–325, title V, §501(a), July 23, 1992, 106 Stat. 677, related to evaluation of system of National Teacher Academies, prior to the general amendment of this subchapter by Pub. L. 105–244.

A prior section 527 of Pub. L. 89–329 was classified to section 1104f of this title, prior to the general amendment of this subchapter by Pub. L. 105–244.

Another prior section 527 of Pub. L. 89–329 was classified to section 1117 of this title, prior to repeal by Pub. L. 94–482.
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be

published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5.4. IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 99-31141

Summary Calendar

EDWARD WAYNE FOSTER,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus

ROBERT G. BUCKLEY, Etc.; ET AL.,

Defendants,

ROBERT G. BUCKLEY, Sheriff of Union Parish,

Defendant-Appellee.

_________________________________________

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Western District of Louisiana

USDC No. 97-CV-1515

_________________________________________

October 27, 2000

Before POLITZ, DAVIS, and BENAVIDES, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: *1 Monell v. Department of Social Services , 436 U.S. 658 (1978).

2 Yohey v. Collins , 985 F.2d 222 (5th Cir. 1993)(issues must be properly briefed to be

preserved for appeal).

3 Illinois v. Gates , 462 U.S. 213 (1983).

2 Edward Wayne Foster appeals the trial court’s grant of summary jud gment,

based on qualified immunity, to defendant Robert Buckley. For the reasons assigned,

we affirm.

Foster does not appeal the grant of summary judgment t o defendant Robert Levy.

As relates to the claims against Buckley in his official capacity, Foster contends only

that Buckley was in charge of the Sheriff’s Office and failed to supervise his officers

properly. Foster does not focus on any alleged failure of any official policy, custom,

or practice of Buckley and thus the official capacity claims lack validity. 1 Foster has

not briefed any state law claims and they are deemed abandoned. 2

Foster maintains that Buckley had information of such quality and quantity that

no reasonable officer would have concluded that probable cause existed for his arrest

for the murder of John Wesley Smith. He further maintains that the affidavit submitted

in support of the application for an arrest warrant contained misstatements and

omissions of fact critical to a finding of probabl e cause. Our review of the record

persuades that under the totality of the circumstances, the evidence from an informant,

as well as other witnesses, provided sufficient basis for po lice to believe reasonably

that there was probable cause to arrest Foster. 3 The claimed misstatements and

omissions in the affidavit Foster advances were not critical to a finding of probable

cause and do not render the affidavit so lacking in indicia of reliability that a belief in4 Malley v. Briggs , 475 U.S. 335 (1986); Morin v. Caire , 77 F.3d 116 (5th Cir. 1996).

3 probable cause is p er se unreasonable. 4 W e find no error in the district c ourt’s

determination that Buckley was entitled to qualified immunity.

The judgment appealed is AFFIRMED.
#### State of Connecticut *v.*Jasper T. Parker

*J err old H. Barnett,*special public defender, on the motion.

Argued November 3

decided November 3, 1970

The motion by Jerrold H. Barnett to withdraw his appearance for the defendant in the appeal from the Superior Court in New Haven County is granted.
###### Editorial Note on [Part 555](/current/title-27/part-555?toc=1)

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 555 appear by T.D. ATF-487, [68 FR 3748](https://www.federalregister.gov/citation/68-FR-3748), Jan. 24, 2003.

#### § 555.219 Table of distances for storage of low explosives.

| Pounds | | From inhabited building distance (feet) | From public railroad and highway distance (feet) | From above ground magazine (feet) |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Over | Not over |
| 0 | 1,000 | 75 | 75 | 50 |
| 1,000 | 5,000 | 115 | 115 | 75 |
| 5,000 | 10,000 | 150 | 150 | 100 |
| 10,000 | 20,000 | 190 | 190 | 125 |
| 20,000 | 30,000 | 215 | 215 | 145 |
| 30,000 | 40,000 | 235 | 235 | 155 |
| 40,000 | 50,000 | 250 | 250 | 165 |
| 50,000 | 60,000 | 260 | 260 | 175 |
| 60,000 | 70,000 | 270 | 270 | 185 |
| 70,000 | 80,000 | 280 | 280 | 190 |
| 80,000 | 90,000 | 295 | 295 | 195 |
| 90,000 | 100,000 | 300 | 300 | 200 |
| 100,000 | 200,000 | 375 | 375 | 250 |
| 200,000 | 300,000 | 450 | 450 | 300 |

# TABLE: Department of Defense Ammunition and Explosives Standards, Table 5-4.1 Extract; 4145.27 M, March 1969

[T.D. ATF-87, [46 FR 40384](https://www.federalregister.gov/citation/46-FR-40384), Aug. 7, 1981, as amended by ATF 2017R-21, [84 FR 13800](https://www.federalregister.gov/citation/84-FR-13800), Apr. 8, 2019]
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

WESTERN DISTRICT

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

Respondent

v.

DONNELL SHIELDS, JR.,

Petitioner :

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

: No. 127 WAL 2017

Petition for Allowance of Appeal from

the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW , this 2nd day of August, 2017

, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is

DENIED

.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 9
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1996
<CASH>                                          16,405
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                               0
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                 1,244
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                    186,026
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                               0
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                                 0
<LOANS>                                        319,354
<ALLOWANCE>                                      4,049
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 547,603
<DEPOSITS>                                     451,467
<SHORT-TERM>                                    22,106
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                              6,301
<LONG-TERM>                                     14,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        15,193
<OTHER-SE>                                      38,536
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>                 547,603
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                 28,634
<INTEREST-INVEST>                               11,770
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                   264
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                                40,668
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                              15,784
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              18,902
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                           21,766
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                      600
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                               1,172
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                 16,380
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  9,007
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                       6,807
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     6,807
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     1.12
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.12
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    8.17
<LOANS-NON>                                        795
<LOANS-PAST>                                       311
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                     0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                  7,600
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                 3,661
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                      291
<RECOVERIES>                                        79
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                                4,049
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                             4,049
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                            838
        

</TABLE>
125 STAT. 768 PUBLIC LAW 112–66—DEC. 13, 2011 

LEGISLATIVE HISTORY—S. 1639: 

CONGRESSIONAL RECORD, Vol. 157 (2011): 

Oct. 6, considered and passed Senate. 

Dec. 6, considered and passed House. 

Æ 

Public Law 112–66 

112th Congress 

An Act 

To amend title 36, United States Code, to authorize the American Legion under 

its Federal charter to provide guidance and leadership to the individual departments and posts of the American Legion, and for other purposes. 

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of 

the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

SECTION 1. ADDITIONAL POWER OF AMERICAN LEGION UNDER FEDERAL CHARTER. 

Section 21704 of title 36, United States Code, is amended— 

(1) by redesignating paragraph (5) through (8) as paragraphs (6) through (9), respectively; and 

(2) by inserting after paragraph (4) the following new paragraph (5): 

‘‘(5) provide guidance and leadership to organizations and 

local chapters established under paragraph (4), but may not 

control or otherwise influence the specific activities and conduct 

of such organizations and local chapters;’’. 

Approved December 13, 2011. 

Dec. 13, 2011 

[S. 1639] 


kgrant on DSKHRRP4G1PROD with PUBLAWS
### **CHAPTER 6—TRADE FAIR PROGRAM**

Sec.
1751.
Designation of fairs.
1752.
Entry of articles for fairs.
1753.
Disposition of articles entered for fairs.
1754.
Marking, packaging, and labeling requirements.
1755.
Responsibilities of fair operator.
1756.
Regulations.
Exhibit 32.2



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT

TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Annual Report of Coach Industries Group, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-KSB for the year ended December 31, 2004, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
Report), I, Susan Weisman, Chief Accounting Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2001, that:



The Report fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



Dated: February 21, 2006



|                                       
|---------------------------------------
|/s/ Susan Weisman                      
|Susan Weisman, Chief Accounting Officer
Editorial Note on Part 41
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 41 (formerly part 275) appear at T.D. ATF-460, 66 FR 39093, July 27, 2001.

§ 41.172 Return to nontaxpaid status, action by taxpayer. ( a ) *General.* Where tobacco products and cigarette papers and tubes which have been imported or brought into the United States are withdrawn from the market and the taxpayer desires to file a claim for refund of the tax on the articles and return them to a nontaxpaid status, he shall, in addition to the requirements of § 41.163, assemble the articles in or adjacent to the factory in which the articles are to be retained or received in a nontaxpaid status. The taxpayer shall group the articles according to the rates of tax applicable to the articles, and shall prepare a schedule of the articles, on Form 5200.7, in triplicate. All copies of the schedule shall be forwarded to the appropriate TTB officer.
( b ) *Large cigars.* Refund or credit of tax on large cigars withdrawn from the market is limited to the lowest tax applicable to that brand and size of cigar during the required record retention period (see § 41.22) except where the importer establishes that a greater amount was actually paid. For each claim involving large cigars withdrawn from the market, the importer must include a certification on either TTB Form 5200.7 or TTB Form 2635 (5620.8) to read as follows:
The amounts claimed relating to large cigars are based on the lowest sale price applicable to the cigars during the required record retention period, except where specific documentation is submitted with the claim to establish that any greater amount of tax claimed was actually paid.
(See 26 U.S.C. 5705)
[T.D. ATF-80, 46 FR 18311, Mar. 24, 1981, and amended by T.D. ATF-232, 51 FR 28087, Aug. 5, 1986; T.D. ATF-243, 51 FR 43194, Dec. 1, 1986; T.D. ATF-251, 52 FR 19341, May 22, 1987; T.D. ATF-307, 55 FR 52745, Dec. 21, 1990; T.D. ATF-424, 64 FR 71933, Dec. 22, 1999; T.D. ATF-420, 64 FR 71944, Dec. 22, 1999. Redesignated and amended by T.D. TTB-16, 69 FR 52424, 52425, Aug. 26, 2004]
### §3476. Regional and field offices

The Secretary is authorized to establish, alter, discontinue, or maintain such regional or other field offices as the Secretary may find necessary or appropriate to perform functions of the Secretary or the Department.

(Pub. L. 96–88, title IV, §416, Oct. 17, 1979, 93 Stat. 685.)
Order entered March 8, 2013

In The

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-12-01116-CR

CYNTHIA LORRAINE WHITAKER, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the County Court at Law No. 2

Collin County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 002-80229-2012

ORDER

The Court REINSTATES the appeal.

On December 12, 2012, we ordered the trial court to make findings regarding why 

appellant’s brief has not been filed. We ADOPT the findings that: (1) appellant desires to 

pursue the appeal; (2) appellant is not indigent and is represented by retained counsel Deric King 

Walpole; (3) counsel has not abandoned the appeal; and (4) appellant’s brief will be filed by 

March 27, 2013.

We ORDER appellant to file her brief by MARCH 27, 2013. Because appellant’s brief 

is already four months overdue, no further extensions will be granted. If appellant’s brief is not 

filed by the date specified, we will, without further notice, submit the appeal without briefs. See

TEX. R. APP. P. 38.8(b)(4). 
We DIRECT the Clerk to send copies of this order, by electronic transmission, to 

counsel for all parties.

/s/ DAVID EVANS

JUSTICE
Exhibit 11


               AMPAL-AMERICAN ISRAEL CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
               --------------------------------------------------

    SCHEDULE SETTING FORTH COMPUTATION OF EARNINGS PER SHARE OF CLASS A STOCK
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------


SIX MONTHS ENDED JUNE 30,                                  1998        1997
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(Amounts in thousands, except                           (Unaudited) (Unaudited)
  per share data)

Weighted average number of shares outstanding:
    4% Preferred ....................................         178         189
    6-1/2% Preferred ................................         955         989
    Class A .........................................      23,859      23,702
                                                          =======     =======

BASIC EPS
 Net Income .........................................     $ 1,087     $ 7,290
                                                          =======     =======

 Earnings per Class A share .........................     $   .05     $   .31
                                                          =======     =======

 Weighted average number of Class A
  shares outstanding ................................      23,859      23,702

DILUTED EPS
 Net Income .........................................     $   953     $ 7,065(1)
                                                          =======     =======

 Earnings per Class A share .........................     $   .03     $   .26
                                                          =======     =======

 Weighted average number of Class A
  shares outstanding assuming
  conversion of preferred stock
  into Class A shares ...............................      27,616      27,614


(1)   Includes decrease in net income of $134 and $225, respectively, due to
      dilution in equity in earnings of affiliate.
###### Editorial Note on Part 555

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 555 appear by T.D. ATF-487, 68 FR 3748, Jan. 24, 2003.

#### § 555.80 Court review.

An applicant, licensee, or permittee may, within 60 days after receipt of the decision of the administrative law judge or the final order of the Director, Industry Operations or the Director, file a petition for a judicial review of the decision, with the U.S. Court of Appeals for the district in which he resides or has his principal place of business. The Director, upon notification that a petition has been filed, shall have prepared a complete transcript of the record of the proceedings. The Director, Industry Operations or the Director, as the case may be, shall certify to the correctness of the transcript of the record, forward one copy to the attorney for the Government in the review of the case, and file the original record of the proceedings with the original certificate in the U.S. Court of Appeals.

[T.D. ATF-87, 46 FR 40384, Aug. 7, 1981, as amended by ATF 2013R-9F, 79 FR 46694, Aug. 11, 2014]
In the Missouri Court of Appeals

Eastern District

JUNE 24, 2014

THE FOLLOWING CASES WERE AFFIRMED IN ACCORDANCE WITH RULE 

84.16(b) OR RULE 30.25(b).

1. ED99990 ARTHUR REED, APP V STATE OF MISSOURI, RES

2. ED99999 STATE OF MISSOURI, RES V JASON BIRDNO, APP

3. ED100144 JOSEPH WRIGHT, ET AL, APP V. LIBERTY SURPLUS, RES

4. ED100343 R. SUTBERRY, RES V TRANS WORLD AIR, APP & SIF, APP

5. ED100361 SUNTIDE HOMES, LLC, RES V. BARBARA LAWRENCE, 

APP

6. ED100383 ROBERT EATON, RES V. CMH HOMES, INC., ET AL, APP

7. ED100404 THOMAS BRONIEC, ET AL, APP V CITY OF DELLWOOD, 

RES

8. ED100405 ARCHIE BLANKENSHIP, APP V STATE OF MISSOURI, RES

9. ED100648 RA HAKEEM, APP V. EXPRESS SERVICES & DES, RES

10. ED100654 C. BROWN, RES V CITY OF COTTLEVILLE, APP & DES 

RES

11. ED100681 CHRISTOPHER BAUER RES V L.E. SAUER MACHINE CO 

APP
EXHIBIT
4






INSTRUMENTS DEFINING THE
RIGHTS OF SECURITY HOLDERS, INCLUDING INDENTURES






Exhibit 4
is:




Shareholder
Rights Agreement dated November 12, 2007, which document is incorporated by
reference to Form 8-A, filed with the Commission on November 13,
2007.




Industrial
Development Revenue Bonds dated April 1, 2001, maturing April 1,
2021.




Industrial
Development Revenue Bonds dated May 1, 1996, maturing May 1, 2016.




Amended
and Restated Note Purchase Agreement dated January 24, 2003, re:
$50,000,000 5.36% Senior Secured Notes due November 30, 2009.




Note
Purchase Agreement dated November 25, 2005, re: SGD 51,000,000 4.25% Senior
Secured Notes due November 25, 2012.




The
Company agrees to provide to the Securities and Exchange Commission, on request,
copies of instruments defining the rights of security holders of long-term debt
of the Company.