alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY ELEV

 124.87

 124.84

 124.46

 123.83

 123.95

 122.78

 122.89

 124.09

 123.20

 120.91

 123.84

 123.53

 122.02

 124.36

 123.82

 124.09

 123.30

 123.07

 122.87

 122.82

 123.25

 123.87

 123.87

 123.53

 124.05

 124.19

 122.71

 122.90

 123.18

 123.82

 123.71

 8,696

 8,681

 8,491

 8,181

 8,238

 7,692

 7,742

 8,306

 7,885

 6,885

 8,186

 8,040

 7,350

 8,441

 8,176

 8,306

 7,932

 7,824

 7,733

 7,710

 7,909

 8,200

 8,200

 8,040

 8,286

 8,356

 7,661

 7,746

 7,876

 8,176

 8,125

STORAGE

+205

-15

-190

-310

+57

-546

+50

+564

-421

-1,000

+1,301

-146

-690

+1,091

-265

+130

-374

-108

-91

-23

+199

+291

+0

-160

+246

+70

-695

+85

+130

+300

-51

CHANGE

2,709

2,563

2,489

2,500

2,631

2,287

2,539

2,815

1,993

1,641

2,720

1,631

1,212

2,087

1,434

1,611

1,364

1,497

1,504

1,550

1,669

1,705

1,556

1,498

1,691

1,584

1,211

1,599

1,633

1,690

1,518

INFLOW

 2,498

 2,463

 2,472

 2,542

 2,488

 2,449

 2,404

 2,423

 1,678

 2,037

 1,956

 1,596

 1,451

 1,428

 1,460

 1,450

 1,485

 1,454

 1,442

 1,450

 1,459

 1,445

 1,446

 1,471

 1,459

 1,440

 1,453

 1,447

 1,460

 1,441

 1,451

POWER

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 419

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

SPILL

 60

 60

 60

 60

 60

 60

 60

 60

 60

 60

 60

 60

 60

 60

 60

 60

 60

 60

 60

 60

 60

 60

 60

 60

 60

 60

 60

 60

 60

 60

 60

HATCHERY

 5

 3

 5

 4

 4

 5

 5

 3

 3

 3

 3

 4

 4

 4

 4

 4

 4

 5

 5

 4

 0

 3

 3

 3

 3

 4

 3

 4

 4

 1

 2

C.F.S.

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

AUGUST 2000 LAKE NATOMA DAILY OPERATIONS RUN DATE: September 20, 2000

IN LAKE

EVAP

C.F.S.

COMPUTED*

ACRE-FEET

RELEASE - C.F.S.

TOTALS -366 58,131 54,598 419 1,860 111

ACRE-FEET -366 115,303 108,295 831 3,689 220

COMMENTS:

* COMPUTED INFLOW IS THE SUM OF CHANGE IN STORAGE, RELEASES AND EVAPORATION.

SUMMARY

RELEASES (ACRE-FEET)

POWER 108,295

SPILL 831

FOLSOM SOUTH CANAL

HATCHERY

 2,636

 3,689

 8,491

FOLSOM

SOUTH 

CANAL

 43

 45

 48

 50

 50

 48

 45

 45

 45

 45

 45

 45

 45

 45

 44

 31

 4

 32

 43

 48

 50

 50

 47

 45

 45

 45

 45

 45

 43

 37

 31

 1,329

 2,636

(1)

(1) INCHES OF EVAPORATION TAKEN FROM FOLSOM PAN.

RELEASES (ACRE-FEET)

TOTAL 115,451

Table 12
###### Editorial Note on Part 41

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 41 (formerly part 275) appear at T.D. ATF-460, 66 FR 39093, July 27, 2001.

#### § 41.24 Interference with administration.

Whoever, corruptly or by force or threats of force, endeavors to hinder or obstruct the administration of this part, or endeavors to intimidate or impede any appropriate TTB officer acting in his official capacity, or forcibly rescues or attempts to rescue or causes to be rescued any property, after it has been duly seized for forfeiture to the United States in connection with a violation of the internal revenue laws, shall be liable to the penalties prescribed by law.

(68A Stat. 855; 26 U.S.C. 7212)

[26 FR 8189, Aug. 31, 1961. Redesignated at 40 FR 16835, Apr. 15, 1975, and further redesignated and amended by T.D. TTB-16, 69 FR 52424, Aug. 26, 2004]
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

DAY ELEV

 976.70

 976.78

 976.93

 976.96

 976.87

 976.77

 976.80

 976.93

 977.08

 977.14

 977.24

 977.25

 977.36

 977.20

 977.16

 977.25

 977.35

 977.45

 977.32

 977.31

 977.39

 977.39

 977.48

 977.49

 977.57

 977.65

 977.73

 977.59

 977.67

 977.77

 1,266.7

 1,267.4

 1,268.7

 1,268.9

 1,268.2

 1,267.3

 1,267.6

 1,268.7

 1,269.9

 1,270.4

 1,271.3

 1,271.3

 1,272.3

 1,270.9

 1,270.6

 1,271.3

 1,272.2

 1,273.0

 1,271.9

 1,271.9

 1,272.5

 1,272.5

 1,273.3

 1,273.4

 1,274.0

 1,274.7

 1,275.4

 1,274.2

 1,274.9

 1,275.7

STORAGE

+0.8

+0.7

+1.3

+0.3

-0.8

-0.8

+0.3

+1.1

+1.3

+0.5

+0.8

+0.1

+0.9

-1.3

-0.3

+0.8

+0.8

+0.8

-1.1

-0.1

+0.7

+0.0

+0.8

+0.1

+0.7

+0.7

+0.7

-1.2

+0.7

+0.8

CHANGE

401

378

648

422

623

565

667

578

653

790

453

411

482

184

872

389

434

437

392

460

361

376

395

431

372

360

355

396

376

445

INFLOW

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 838

 1,011

 0

 0

 0

 923

 472

 9

 335

 0

 367

 0

 0

 0

 969

 0

 0

POWER

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

SPILL

 0

 0

 0

 287

 962

 962

 524

 0

 0

 520

 0

 342

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

OUTLET

 22

 41

 16

 8

 41

 24

 16

 30

 19

 16

 30

 27

 16

 24

 30

 8

 11

 14

 19

 30

 14

 41

 14

 22

 33

 22

 16

 19

 38

 22

C.F.S.

 .08

 .15

 .06

 .03

 .15

 .09

 .06

 .11

 .07

 .06

 .11

 .10

 .06

 .09

 .11

 .03

 .04

 .05

 .07

 .11

 .05

 .15

 .05

 .08

 .12

 .08

 .06

 .07

 .14

 .08

INCHES

 .27

 .00

 .28

 .10

 .02

 .00

 .22

 .00

 .75

 .05

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .34

 .11

 .02

 .02

 .01

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

PRECIP

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

NOVEMBER 2003 NEW MELONES LAKE DAILY OPERATIONS RUN DATE: March 12, 2004

IN LAKE

EVAPORATION

INCHES

C.F.S.

COMPUTED*

1000 ACRE-FEET

RELEASE - C.F.S.

TOTALS +10.1 14,106 4,924 0 3,597 683 2.51 2.19

ACRE-FEET +10,100 27,979 9,767 0 7,135 1,355

COMMENTS:

* COMPUTED INFLOW IS THE SUM OF CHANGE IN STORAGE, RELEASES AND EVAPORATION.

SUMMARY

RELEASE (ACRE-FEET)

POWER 9,767

SPILL 0

OUTLET

TOTAL

 7,135

 16,902

PRECIPITATION

THIS MONTH =

TO DATE =

 2.19

JULY 1, 2003 2.82

 1,266.0
I 

114TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 3796 

To amend section 232 of the National Housing Act to provide that nursing 

homes receiving low ratings for purposes of the Medicare or Medicaid 

programs are ineligible for mortgage insurance under such section, and 

for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

OCTOBER 21, 2015 

Mr. WALKER introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Financial Services 

A BILL 

To amend section 232 of the National Housing Act to provide that nursing homes receiving low ratings for purposes of the Medicare or Medicaid programs are ineligible 

for mortgage insurance under such section, and for other 

purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Nursing Home Ac5 countability Act of 2015’’. 


SSpencer on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 3796 IH

1 SEC. 2. INELIGIBILITY FOR MORTGAGES UNDER SECTION 

2 232 OF NATIONAL HOUSING ACT. 

3 Section 232 of the National Housing Act (12 U.S.C. 

4 1715w) is amended by adding at the end the following 

5 new subsection: 

6 ‘‘(k) INELIGIBILITY BASED ON 5-STAR RATING SYS7 TEM SCORE.— 

8 ‘‘(1) INELIGIBILITY.—Except as provided in 

9 paragraph (2), on and after January 1, 2017, the 

10 Secretary may not insure any mortgage under this 

11 section for any nursing home that for any period of 

12 30 or more consecutive months beginning after De13 cember 31, 2016, has had as an overall quality rat14 ing, under the 5-Star Quality Rating System, of 2 

15 or less stars or an equivalent rating under any suc16 cessor system. 

17 ‘‘(2) RENEWAL OF ELIGIBILITY.—A nursing 

18 home that is otherwise ineligible for mortgage insur19 ance under this section by reason of paragraph (1) 

20 shall be eligible for such insurance if after the con21 clusion of the most recent period described in sub22 paragraph (A) for such facility, such facility has 

23 maintained, for a period of 30 or more consecutive 

24 months, an overall quality rating under the 5-Star 

25 Quality Rating System of 3 or more stars or an 

26 equivalent rating under any successor system. 


SSpencer on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
3 

•HR 3796 IH

1 ‘‘(3) 5-STAR QUALITY RATING SYSTEM.—The 

2 term ‘5-Star Quality Rating System’ means the rat3 ing system established pursuant to sections 1819(i) 

4 and 1919(i) of the Social Security Act (42 U.S.C. 

5 1395i–3(i), 1396(r)(i)) and in effect on the date of 

6 the enactment of this subsection. 

7 ‘‘(4) EXISTING MORTGAGES.—This subsection 

8 may not be construed to affect any mortgage insured 

9 under this section before the date specified in para10 graph (1).’’. 

Æ 


SSpencer on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
###### Editorial Note on Part 44

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 44 appear by T.D. ATF-464, 66 FR 43480, Aug. 20, 2001, and T.D. ATF-480, 67 FR 30801-30803, May 8, 2002.

#### § 44.210 Return of shipment to factory or export warehouse.

A manufacturer or export warehouse proprietor may return to his factory or export warehouse, without internal revenue supervision when so authorized by the appropriate TTB officer, tobacco products, and cigarette papers and tubes previously removed therefrom, under this part, but not yet exported. The manufacturer or export warehouse proprietor shall, prior to returning the articles to his factory or export warehouse, make application to the appropriate TTB officer for permission so to do, which application shall be accompanied by two copies of the notice of removal, Form 5200.14, under which the articles were originally removed. If less than the entire shipment is intended to be returned to the factory or export warehouse, the application shall set forth accurately the articles to be returned and shall show what disposition was made of the remainder of the original shipment and any other facts pertinent to such shipment. Where the appropriate TTB officer approves the application, he shall so indicate by endorsement to that effect on each of the copies of the notice of removal, set forth the articles for which return is approved, and return both copies of the notice of removal to the manufacturer or export warehouse proprietor concerned. Upon receipt of the copies of the notice of removal bearing the endorsement of the appropriate TTB officer, the manufacturer or export warehouse proprietor shall return the articles to his factory or export warehouse, properly modify and execute the certificate of receipt on each copy of the notice of removal, return one such copy to the appropriate TTB officer, and retain the other copy as a part of his records.

(72 Stat. 1418, as amended; 26 U.S.C. 5704)

[T.D. 6871, 31 FR 54, Jan. 4, 1966. Redesignated at 40 FR 16835, Apr. 15, 1975, and amended by T.D. ATF-232, 51 FR 28089, Aug. 5, 1986; T.D. ATF-243, 51 FR 43194, Dec. 1, 1986; T.D. ATF-421, 64 FR 71926, Dec. 22, 1999]
### SAT Report PMN Number: P-13-0648 SAT Date: 7/9/2013 Print Date: 9/3/2014
Related cases :

Concern levels : Type of Concern: Health Eco Comments Level of Concern: 1-2 1 Health: PMN ; Eco: 2 Health: Incin Pdt ; Eco:
Persistence Bioaccum Toxicity Comments 3 1 1 PMN 3 2 2 Incin Pdt

Exposure Based Review : Health: N o Ecotox: N o Routes of exposure : Health: Drinking Water Inhalation Ecotox: N o releases to water Fate: ; PMN negl; Incin Pdt rapid Keywords : Keywords: LUNGIncompl Incin PdtLIVER BLOOD MALE REPRO
ONCO IMMUNOSUPPRESS TERRATOX Summary of Assessment :Fate : Fate Summary: P-13-0648 FATE: Solid
VP < 1.0E-6 torr at 25 C (E) BP > 400 C (E) H < 1.00E-8 (E) POTW removal (%) = 90 via sorption Time for complete ultimate aerobic biodeg > mo Sorption to soils/sediments = PMN v.strong; Incin Pdt low PBT Potential: PMN P3B1; Incin Pdt P3B2 *CEB FATE: Migration to ground water = PMN negl; Incin Pdt rapid
Health : Health Summary: Absorption is nil all routes, based on physical/chemical p roperties. There is comcern for lung toxicity if inhaled based on lung overload for high molecular weight polymers. For the potential incomplete incineration product, based on test data for the analogue concerns are liver toxicity, blood toxicity, and male reproductive toxicity [rat 28-day oral NOAEL 50 mg/kg, LOAEL 150 mg/kg with liver toxicity; rat 90-day oral LOAEL 10 mg/kg based on decreased body weight in males at all doses and liver toxicity and anemia at 200 mg/kg; there were toxic effects on the testes in 2 males in the 90-day oral study that were judged by the reviewer to be indicative of the potential for male reproductive toxicity. There is also concern for immunosuppression and oncogenicity based on data for

Ecotox : Test Organism Test Type Test End Point Predicted Measured Comments
fish 96-h LC50 * daphnid 48-h LC50 * green algal 96-h EC50 * fish

_ chronic value * daphnid

_ chronic value * algal

_ chronic value * Sewage Sludge 3-h EC50

_ Sewage Sludge

_ Chronic Value _

Ecotox Values Comments: Predictions are based on SARs for nonionic polymers; SARchemical class = p H7; effective concentrations based on 100% active ingredients and nominal concentrations; hardness <150.0 mg/L as CaCO3; and TOC <2.0 mg/L; high concern for toxicity of incomplete incineration products to terrestrial organisms
Factors Values Comments Assessment Factor 10 Concentration of Concern ( p pb) *

SARs nonionic polymer SAR Class p olyme r -nonionic Ecotox Category N onionic Polymers
Ecotox Factors Comments: SAT Chair: J. Kwiat
###### Editorial Note on Part 44

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 44 appear by T.D. ATF-464, 66 FR 43480, Aug. 20, 2001, and T.D. ATF-480, 67 FR 30801-30803, May 8, 2002.

#### § 44.248 Packages.

Cigars shall, before withdrawal under this part, be put up by the customs warehouse proprietor in packages which shall bear the label or notice, tax classification, and mark, as required by this subpart.

(Sec. 202, Pub. L. 85-859, 72 Stat. 1422 (26 U.S.C. 5723))

[T.D. ATF-40, 42 FR 5009, Jan. 26, 1977]
### §1701. Congressional declaration of policy

#### (a) Entitlement to equal educational opportunity; neighborhood as appropriate basis

The Congress declares it to be the policy of the United States that—

(1) all children enrolled in public schools are entitled to equal educational opportunity without regard to race, color, sex, or national origin; and

(2) the neighborhood is the appropriate basis for determining public school assignments.

#### (b) Purpose

In order to carry out this policy, it is the purpose of this subchapter to specify appropriate remedies for the orderly removal of the vestiges of the dual school system.

(Pub. L. 93–380, title II, §202, Aug. 21, 1974, 88 Stat. 514.)

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date

Section effective on and after sixtieth day after Aug. 21, 1974, see section 2(c) of Pub. L. 93–380, set out as a note under section 1221–1 of this title.

#### Short Title

Pub. L. 93–380, title II, §201, Aug. 21, 1974, 88 Stat. 514, provided that: "This title [enacting this chapter and section 1228 of this title and amending section 1608 of this title] may be cited as the 'Equal Educational Opportunities Act of 1974'."
1 845 - 0039

– Affected Public

– For- Profit Institutions 3 / 17 /2015

Institutions are required to report student Pell Grant pay ment information to ED electronicall y. Electronic reporting is conducted through the Common Origination and Disbursement (COD) sy stem. The COD s ys tem is used by institutions to request, report, and reconcile grant funds received from the Pell Grant program. ED uses the information collected in the COD s ys tem to aid in ensuring compliance with fiscal and administrative requirements under the HEA for the Pell Grant program and under 34 CFR 690 for the Pell Grant program regulations. The minimum reporting requirement is one record for origination and disbursement data per student, per grant award, per award ye ar. Institutions may correct an accepted COD record as many times as they

wish, but are n ot required to submit changes unless the student’s award amount changes from the accepted origination amount originall y established in COD. For the 2014 - 2015 award year, the projected number of FAFSA completers is expected to be reduced b y 2.86%. Based o n the 8,738,722 unduplicated student recipients for the Federal Pell Grant program for 2013 - 2014, the number of unduplicated Federal Pell Grant recipients for 2014 - 2015 is estimated to be 8,488,843 multiplied by .07 hours per recipient for all institution s to enter data in the COD sy stem for a total of 594,219 burden hours. 2,116 For- Profit institutions 1,697,769 responses X .07 hours = 118,844 burden hours
#### § 31.162 Discontinuance of business.

When a wholesale dealer in liquors who is required, under § 31.160, to file a monthly summary report discontinues business, a monthly summary report marked “Final” must be filed covering transactions through the date of discontinuance.

(26 U.S.C. 5121)
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 12-50662

Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee

v.

WALTER LEONARDO,

Defendant-Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Western District of Texas

USDC No. 2:09-CR-1079-1

Before DAVIS, BENAVIDES, and PRADO, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Walter Leonardo pleaded guilty to illegally reentering the United States

after deportation. The district court sentenced him to 46 months of

imprisonment and three years of supervised release. Leonardo has appealed,

contending that the district court did not adequately explain its reasons for

imposing supervised release and that the imposition of a term of supervised

release does not advance the goals of 18 U.S.C. § 3553(a).

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

F I L E D

September 16, 2013

Lyle W. Cayce

Clerk

* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not

be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

 Case: 12-50662 Document: 00512375498 Page: 1 Date Filed: 09/16/2013
No. 12-50662

Because Leonardo has been released from prison and deported to

Guatemala, however, his appealis moot, see United States v. Rosenbaum-Alanis,

483 F.3d 381, 383 (5th Cir. 2007), and accordingly is DISMISSED.

2

 Case: 12-50662 Document: 00512375498 Page: 2 Date Filed: 09/16/2013
EXHIBIT 32.2
                                                                    ------------



             CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SS.1350, AS ADOPTED
              PURSUANT TO SS.906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

         In connection with the quarterly report of Spire Corporation (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q (the "Report") for the period ended June 30, 2009 as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, I,
Christian Dufresne, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer of the Company,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss.1350, as adopted pursuant to ss.906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

         1.    The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         2.    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.

Dated:   August 14, 2009               By: /s/ Christian Dufresne
                                           -------------------------------------
                                           Christian Dufresne, Ph. D.
                                           Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer




         A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or
other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the
signatures that appear in typed form within the electronic version of this
written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to the Company and
will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange
Commission or its staff upon request.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

DAY HIGH

 220

 204

 198

 211

 220

 221

 234

 220

 222

 226

 376

 502

 498

 464

 233

 238

 227

 231

 207

 241

 247

 240

 248

 260

 269

 290

 299

 328

 351

 363

 166

 157

 158

 158

 171

 178

 174

 174

 178

 182

 180

 316

 439

 181

 183

 183

 185

 182

 186

 186

 190

 190

 189

 188

 186

 184

 181

 181

 181

 178

 188

 183

 181

 182

 183

 186

 187

 185

 190

 195

 221

 417

 460

 313

 192

 194

 194

 194

 194

 202

 206

 206

 208

 211

 219

 224

 225

 232

 245

 240

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

SEPTEMBER 2017 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: October 3, 2017

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

DELTA MENDOTA CANAL AT CHECK 13 (O'NEILL)
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

DAY HIGH

 645

 641

 633

 652

 648

 631

 639

 628

 625

 644

 626

 666

 683

 690

 662

 674

 677

 571

 716

 652

 723

 673

 703

 665

 667

 687

 661

 625

 674

 692

 632

 631

 613

 620

 628

 573

 625

 618

 609

 602

 607

 606

 612

 601

 571

 560

 382

 381

 281

 548

 592

 600

 606

 592

 565

 593

 562

 386

 403

 575

 637

 635

 624

 636

 637

 613

 634

 622

 617

 618

 618

 615

 635

 615

 609

 595

 571

 522

 538

 588

 620

 616

 633

 610

 616

 617

 605

 589

 575

 622

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

SEPTEMBER 2014 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: October 1, 2014

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

DELTA MENDOTA CANAL AT CHECK 13 (O'NEILL)
No. 21470.

#### Charles Willard Ferguson *v.*Harry C. Tinsley, Warden of the Colorado State Penitentiary.

(401 P.2d 615)

Decided May 3, 1965.

Plaintiff in error, pro se.

Duke W. Dunbar, Attorney General, Frank E. Hickey, Deputy, George H. Sibley, Special Assistant, for defendant in error.

*En Banc.*

Mr. Chief Justice Pringle

delivered the opinion of the Court.

*177Plaintiff in error, Charles Willard Ferguson, filed a petition for writ of habeas corpus in the trial court. He contended there, as he does here, that the sentence of not less than 20 years nor more than 30 years imposed upon him for the crime of robbery was null and void in that C.R.S. ’53, 40-5-1, provides that one convicted of the crime charged against him should “be confined in the penitentiary for a term of not less than two years, or for life.” The trial court refused to issue the writ on the ground that it appeared from the face of the petition that the relief sought could not be granted. From this judgment, Ferguson brings writ of error here.

Ferguson contends that the statute by its specific language limited the trial judge to sentence him either to two years, or to life imprisonment. He engages in an interesting argument in semantics to sustain his position. We hold that this controversy is foreclosed by the decision of this Court in *O’Day v.*People, 114 Colo. 373, 166 P.2d 789, where we construed the statute in question as though it read “a minimum of two years to a maximum of life.” Ferguson’s argument is that the rule in *O’Day*is of no effect and must yield to his position, because, in his view, *O’Day*is wrong. Despite this protestation, we adhere to the rule announced in *O’Day.*

The judgment is affirmed.