alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 72.39 Final action. ( a ) *Petitions for remission or mitigation of forfeiture.* ( 1 ) The Director shall take final action on any petition filed pursuant to these regulations. Such final action shall consist either of the allowance or denial of the petition. In the case of allowance, the Director shall state the conditions of the allowance.
( 2 ) In the case of an allowed petition, the Director may order the property or carrier returned to the petitioner, sold for the account of the petitioner, or, pursuant to agreement, acquired for official use.
( 3 ) The Director or his delegate shall notify the petitioner of the allowance or denial of the petition and, in the case of allowance, the terms and conditions under which the Director allowed the petition.
( b ) *Offers in compromise of liability to forfeiture.* The Director or his delegate shall take final action on any offer in compromise of the liability to forfeiture of personal property, including carriers, seized as provided in § 72.21. Such action shall consist either of the acceptance or rejection of the offer.
[T.D. ATF-9, 39 FR 9954, Mar. 15, 1974, as amended by T.D. ATF-183, 49 FR 37061, Sept. 21, 1984]
#### Hiram Goodrich, Respondent, *v.*Frederick M. Wheeler et al., Commissioners, etc., Appellants. John Mitchell, Respondent, *v.*The Same, Appellants. David Maydole, Respondent, *v.*The Same, Appellants. Frederick F. Hall, Respondent, *v.*The Same, Appellants. The First National Bank of Berlin, Respondent, *v.*The Same, Appellants. Theodore D. Miller, Respondent, *v.*The Same, Appellants. Bank of Chenango, Respondent, *v.*The Same, Appellants.

These cases presented the same question, and were argued and decided with *The First National Bank of Oxford*v. *Wheeler (ante,*p. 201).
### §4422. Reports

#### (a) Annual report

The President of the Institute shall submit an annual report to the Congress and to the Board concerning the status of the Institute during the 12 calendar months preceding the date of the report. Such report shall include, among other matters, a detailed statement of all private and public funds, gifts, and other items of a monetary value received by the Institute during such 12-month period and the disposition thereof as well as any recommendations for improving the Institute.

#### (b) Budget proposal

(1) After September 30, 1988 and for each fiscal year thereafter, the Board shall submit a budget proposal to the Congress.

(2) A budget proposal under this subsection shall be submitted not later than April 1 of each calendar year and shall propose a budget for the Institute for the 2 fiscal years succeeding the fiscal year during which such proposal is submitted.

(3) In determining the amount of funds to be appropriated to the Institute on the basis of such proposals, the Congress shall not consider the amount of private fundraising or bequests made on behalf of the Institute during any preceding fiscal year.

(Pub. L. 99–498, title XV, §1515, Oct. 17, 1986, 100 Stat. 1609; Pub. L. 100–297, title V, §5406(f), Apr. 28, 1988, 102 Stat. 418; Pub. L. 102–325, title XIII, §1331(g), July 23, 1992, 106 Stat. 807.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

1992—Subsec. (b). Pub. L. 102–325 redesignated pars. (2) to (4) as (1) to (3), respectively, and struck out former par. (1) which read as follows: "Prior to October 1, 1988, the Board shall submit a budget proposal to the Secretary of the Interior. The Secretary shall submit that proposal to the Congress."

1988—Subsec. (b)(1). Pub. L. 100–297, §5406(f)(1), substituted "Prior to October 1, 1988" for "During the 2-year period beginning on the date referred to in section 4421(f) of this title".

Subsec. (b)(2). Pub. L. 100–297, §5406(f)(2), substituted "September 30, 1988" for "the period described in paragraph (1)".

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date of 1992 Amendment

Amendment by Pub. L. 102–325 effective Oct. 1, 1992, see section 2 of Pub. L. 102–325, set out as a note under section 1001 of this title.

#### Effective Date of 1988 Amendment

For effective date and applicability of amendment by Pub. L. 100–297, see section 6303 of Pub. L. 100–297, set out as a note under section 1071 of this title.

#### Termination of Reporting Requirements

For termination, effective May 15, 2000, of provisions in subsec. (a) of this section relating to submitting an annual report to Congress, and provisions in subsec. (b) of this section relating to submitting annual budget proposal to Congress, see section 3003 of Pub. L. 104–66, as amended, set out as a note under section 1113 of Title 31, Money and Finance, and page 201 of House Document No. 103–7.
### §6845. Rules of construction

Nothing in this part shall be construed—

(1) to prohibit a local educational agency from serving English learners simultaneously with children with similar educational needs, in the same educational settings where appropriate;

(2) to require a State or a local educational agency to establish, continue, or eliminate any particular type of instructional program for English learners; or

(3) to limit the preservation or use of Native American languages.

(Pub. L. 89–10, title III, §3124, formerly §3125, as added Pub. L. 107–110, title III, §301, Jan. 8, 2002, 115 Stat. 1705; renumbered §3124 and amended Pub. L. 114–95, title III, §§3001(2)(B), 3003(k), Dec. 10, 2015, 129 Stat. 1953, 1964.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Prior Provisions

A prior section 6845, Pub. L. 89–10, title III, §3135, as added Pub. L. 103–382, title I, §101, Oct. 20, 1994, 108 Stat. 3647, related to local applications for technology education assistance, prior to the general amendment of this subchapter by Pub. L. 107–110.

A prior section 3124 of Pub. L. 89–10 was renumbered section 3123 and is classified to section 6844 of this title.

#### Amendments

2015—Pars. (1), (2). Pub. L. 114–95, §3003(k), substituted "English learners" for "limited English proficient children".

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date of 2015 Amendment

Amendment by Pub. L. 114–95 effective Dec. 10, 2015, except with respect to certain noncompetitive programs and competitive programs, see section 5 of Pub. L. 114–95, set out as a note under section 6301 of this title.
Exhibit 10.17

 

FIRST 2014 AMENDMENT TO

LA-Z-BOY INCORPORATED

SEVERANCE PLAN FOR NAMED EXECUTIVE OFFICERS

 

La-Z-Boy Incorporated (the “Company”) adopts this First 2014 Amendment to the La-Z-Boy Incorporated Severance Plan for Named Executive Officers (the “Plan”).

 

WITNESSETH:

 

WHEREAS the Company previously established the Plan for the benefit of certain of its employees; and

 

WHEREAS the Company reserved the right to amend the Plan; and

 

WHEREAS the Company believes it advisable and in the Company’s best interests to make certain changes to the Plan;

 

NOW, THEREFORE, the Plan is amended as follows:

 

1.                                      Article III is deleted and replaced with the following:

 

To be eligible for Severance Benefits under the Plan, an Employee must become a Participant in this Plan and continue to be a Participant immediately before the Participant’s Termination Date.  An Employee will become a Participant in this Plan on the date (but not prior to the Effective Date) that the Employee is designated as an “Executive Officer” by the Board of Directors.  Each Participant shall be listed on Schedule A to this Plan, which schedule may be updated from time to time by the Company.  Severance Benefits may only be distributed to, or on behalf of, a Participant (as applicable) if the remaining requirements of this Plan are met.

 

2.                                      Schedule A shall be expanded and include:

 


	
Participant
    	
 
    	
Date of Participation
    	
 
    	
Position in La-Z-Boy
   Incorporated
    
	
J.   Douglas Collier
    	
 
    	
November 18,   2014
    	
 
    	
Senior   Vice President
    
	
Darrell   D. Edwards
    	
 
    	
November 18,   2014
    	
 
    	
Senior   Vice President
    




 

The above amendments shall be effective November 18, 2014.

 

Except as specifically amended by this Amendment, the provisions of the Plan are reaffirmed and shall remain in full force and effect.

 











 

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has signed this Amendment to evidence adoption of this Amendment on the 10th day of December, 2014.

 

	
 
    	
LA-Z-BOY INCORPORATED
    
	
 
    	
 
    
	
 
    	
 
    
	
 
    	
By
    	
/s/ Kurt L. Darrow
    
	
 
    	
 
    
	
 
    	
Its Chairman, President   and Chief Executive Officer
    


 

2
(No. 73-CC-248

#### Phillips Petroleum Company, Claimant, *vs.*State of Illinois, Department of Law Enforcement, Respondent.

*Opinion filed June 20, 1973.*

Phillips Petroleum Company, Claimant, pro se.

William J. Scott, Attorney General; Douglas G. Olson, Assistant Attorney General, for Respondent.

Per Curiam.
* After examining appellant’s brief and the appellate record, this panel has

determined unanimously that oral argument would notmaterially assist the determination of this appeal. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2) and 10th Cir. R. 34.1(G). The case is therefore submitted without o ral argument. This order and judgment is not binding precedent, except under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. The court ge nerally disfavors the citation of orders and judgments; nevertheless, an order and ju dgment may be cited under the terms and conditions of 10th Cir. R. 36.3. 

## F I L E D United States Court of Appeals Tenth Circuit 

### JUN 5 2001 

### PATRICK FISHER Clerk 

### UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

TENTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee,

v. CARLOS ORANTES-MENDEZ, Defendant-Appellant. No. 00-3358 (D.C. No. 00-CR-10082-MLB)

(Kansas)



### ORDER AND JUDGMENT *

Before SEYMOUR , McKAY , and BRORBY , Circuit Judges.

Carlos Orantes-Mendez was convicted of illegally re entering the United States after deportation, in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326(a). Violations of that statute carry a maximum prison term of two years. However, section 1326(b)(2)-2-

provides enhanced prison terms of up to twenty year s for those who reenter the country illegally after a previous aggravated felony conviction. In light of Mr. Orantes-Mendez’ prior aggravated felony conviction, he was sentenced to fiftyseven months in prison. Relying on Apprendi v. New Jersey , 530 U.S. 466, 490 (2000), and United States v. Jones , 235 F.3d 1231, 1236 (10th Cir. 2000), Mr. Orantes -Mendez argues his enhanced sentence is invalid because the fact of the prior conviction was not specified in his indictment. This argumentdisregards the explicit language of Apprendi , which limited its application to facts “other tha n a prior conviction.” 466 U.S. at 490. Prior felony convic tions remain a valid basis for sentencing enhancements under Almendarez-Torres v. United States , 523 U.S. 224 (1998). See also United States v. Martinez-Villalva , 232 F.3d 1329, 1331-1332 (10th Cir. 2000) (prior felony remains sentencing f actor for section 1326 offense after Apprendi). Mr. Orantes-Mendez acknowledges these holdings and asserts that he makes his current argument in order to preserve the issue for further appeal. Nevertheless, based upon existing law his appeal mu st be DENIED

. ENTERED FOR THE COURT Stephanie K. Seymour Circuit Judge
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

DAY ELEV

 124.52

 124.78

 124.64

 123.74

 124.12

 124.28

 124.10

 123.79

 123.82

 123.41

 123.42

 123.23

 123.23

 123.18

 123.18

 123.45

 123.67

 124.37

 123.15

 123.69

 123.87

 123.73

 123.02

 123.99

 123.26

 123.09

 122.34

 122.88

 123.44

 8,521

 8,651

 8,581

 8,139

 8,321

 8,401

 8,311

 8,162

 8,176

 7,984

 7,988

 7,899

 7,899

 7,876

 7,876

 8,003

 8,106

 8,446

 7,862

 8,115

 8,200

 8,134

 7,800

 8,256

 7,913

 7,833

 7,494

 7,737

 7,998

STORAGE

+481

+130

-70

-442

+182

+80

-90

-149

+14

-192

+4

-89

+0

-23

+0

+127

+103

+340

-584

+253

+85

-66

-334

+456

-343

-80

-339

+243

+261

CHANGE

2,477

2,311

2,209

2,015

2,325

2,272

2,192

2,180

2,255

2,139

2,232

2,190

2,235

2,224

2,250

2,313

2,286

2,395

4,585

7,148

7,080

7,031

6,902

7,175

5,859

6,014

5,618

5,096

3,472

INFLOW

 2,133

 2,145

 2,144

 2,138

 2,132

 2,131

 2,133

 2,149

 2,142

 2,130

 2,124

 2,129

 2,129

 2,130

 2,144

 2,144

 2,131

 2,136

 3,851

 4,909

 4,911

 4,936

 4,960

 4,929

 4,955

 4,973

 4,915

 4,886

 3,249

POWER

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 967

 2,050

 2,066

 2,068

 2,050

 1,955

 1,016

 1,021

 806

 0

 0

SPILL

 60

 60

 60

 60

 60

 60

 60

 60

 60

 60

 60

 60

 60

 60

 60

 60

 60

 60

 60

 60

 60

 60

 60

 60

 60

 60

 60

 60

 60

HATCHERY

 1

 0

 0

 0

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 0

 1

 1

 1

 1

 0

 0

 0

 1

 1

 0

 1

 1

 1

C.F.S.

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

FEBRUARY 2004 LAKE NATOMA DAILY OPERATIONS RUN DATE: March 29, 2004

IN LAKE

EVAP

C.F.S.

COMPUTED*

ACRE-FEET

RELEASE - C.F.S.

TOTALS -42 106,480 89,918 13,999 1,740 21

ACRE-FEET -42 211,203 178,352 27,767 3,451 42

COMMENTS:

* COMPUTED INFLOW IS THE SUM OF CHANGE IN STORAGE, RELEASES AND EVAPORATION.

SUMMARY

RELEASES (ACRE-FEET)

POWER 178,352

SPILL 27,767

FOLSOM SOUTH CANAL

HATCHERY

 1,626

 3,451

 8,040

FOLSOM

SOUTH 

CANAL

 40

 40

 40

 40

 40

 40

 43

 45

 45

 45

 45

 45

 45

 45

 45

 45

 42

 27

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 7

 26

 30

 820

 1,626

(1)

(1) INCHES OF EVAPORATION TAKEN FROM FOLSOM PAN.

RELEASES (ACRE-FEET)

TOTAL 211,196

Table 12
§ 5.130 Appearance of endorsement. ( a ) *General.* Distilled spirits labels, containers, or packaging may not include the name, or the simulation or abbreviation of the name, of any living individual of public prominence, or an existing private or public organization, or any graphic, pictorial, or emblematic representation of the individual or organization, if its use is likely to lead a consumer to falsely believe that the product has been endorsed, made, or used by, or produced for, or under the supervision of, or in accordance with the specifications of, such individual or organization. This section does not prohibit the use of such names where the individual or organization has provided authorization for their use.
( b ) *Disclaimers.* Statements or other representations do not violate this section if, taken as a whole, they create no misleading impression as to an implied endorsement either because of the context in which they are presented or because of the use of an adequate disclaimer.
( c ) *Exception.* This section does not apply to the use of the name of any person engaged in business as a distiller, rectifier (processor), blender, or other producer, or as an importer, wholesaler, retailer, bottler, or warehouseman of distilled spirits. This section also does not apply to the use by any person of a trade or brand name that is the name of any living individual of public prominence or existing private or public organization, provided such trade or brand name was used by the industry member or its predecessors in interest prior to August 29, 1935.
### Part C—Comprehensive Educational Planning and Evaluation
August 2023

STORAGE INFLOW- C.F.S. RELEASE - C.F.S. GAINS(+)

ACRE-FEET O'NEILL S.LUIS CALIF. O'NEILL

S.LUIS DOS AMIGOS * OR LOSS

(-)

DAY ELEV IN LAKE CHANGE PUMPING GEN. AQUEDUCT GEN. PUMPING PUMPING DELIV. C.F.S.

45,158

1 221.72 47,651 2,493 617 4,643 6,832 0 0 10,465 -371

2 221.17 46,206 -1,445 588 2,557 6,937 0 0 10,705 -105

3 220.96 45,656 -550 380 4,180 6,245 0 0 10,991 -91

4 221.43 46,889 1,233 763 3,311 6,974 0 0 10,535 109

5 222.43 49,527 2,638 1,107 3,298 6,780 0 0 9,909 54

6 223.82 53,242 3,715 1,369 2,198 6,769 0 0 8,602 139

7 223.67 52,840 -402 1,016 1,776 6,784 0 551 9,253 24

8 222.61 50,006 -2,834 599 2,537 6,159 0 0 10,375 -349

9 222.55 49,847 -159 741 1,683 7,493 0 0 10,174 176

10 221.83 47,940 -1,907 585 2,365 6,629 138 0 10,352 -51

11 221.88 48,071 131 841 2,023 6,830 7 0 9,834 211

12 221.89 48,098 27 1,125 4,040 4,901 254 0 9,661 -137

13 223.25 51,714 3,616 1,444 1,851 6,563 0 0 8,023 -12

14 222.80 50,513 -1,201 1,244 1,760 7,000 0 1,115 9,203 -291

15 221.43 46,889 -3,624 915 1,853 6,980 19 1,265 10,133 -157

16 221.53 47,152 263 789 2,521 6,705 0 0 10,011 128

17 221.62 47,388 236 559 2,507 6,793 0 0 9,422 -317

18 221.42 46,863 -525 814 1,340 6,995 0 0 9,508 94

19 221.06 45,918 -945 1,157 1,179 6,853 0 633 8,920 -113

20 221.35 46,679 761 1,504 842 6,810 0 2,371 6,266 -136

21 222.01 48,411 1,732 1,251 1,178 6,808 0 2,066 6,030 -268

22 222.69 50,219 1,808 1,384 1,344 6,758 0 2,078 6,202 -295

23 222.91 50,806 587 1,433 1,007 6,884 0 2,415 6,628 15

24 221.81 47,887 -2,919 1,230 337 7,057 0 2,707 7,223 -165

25 220.56 44,609 -3,278 1,255 0 6,991 0 2,370 7,511 -18

26 220.23 43,749 -860 1,469 0 6,842 0 1,420 7,389 64

27 220.39 44,166 417 1,591 0 6,579 0 1,726 6,211 -23

28 220.18 43,619 -547 1,661 0 6,528 0 1,257 7,352 145

29 220.69 44,949 1,330 1,385 508 7,101 0 0 8,468 145

30 220.74 45,080 131 1,270 1,184 6,716 0 630 8,497 23

31 220.85 45,368 288 1,293 1,861 5,668 0 0 8,332 -345

TOTALS 210 33,379 55,883 207,964 418 22,604 272,185 -1,917

ACRE-FEET 210 66,205 110,84

9

412,498 827 44,835 539,878 783 -3,802

* DAILY DEL. FIGURES UNAVAILABLE. TOT. DEL. IS INCLUDED IN COMPUTING MONTHLY TOTALS

SUMMARY

Release (ACRE-FEET)

O'Neill Generation 827 Dos Amigos Pump 539,878

San Luis Pump 44,835 Deliveries 783

Total 586323

Historical Archive and Report Database

Consolidated State-Federal O'Neill Forebay 

Daily Operations

Run Date: 1/30/2024
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY ELEV

 491.71

 491.59

 491.46

 491.24

 491.00

 490.75

 490.51

 490.26

 490.04

 489.91

 489.75

 489.59

 489.45

 489.31

 489.17

 489.04

 488.91

 488.71

 488.47

 488.21

 488.04

 487.90

 487.78

 487.64

 487.51

 487.31

 487.10

 486.84

 486.58

 486.34

 486.08

 192.1

 191.8

 191.4

 190.8

 190.2

 189.5

 188.8

 188.2

 187.6

 187.2

 186.8

 186.4

 186.0

 185.6

 185.2

 184.9

 184.5

 184.0

 183.4

 182.7

 182.2

 181.9

 181.5

 181.2

 180.8

 180.3

 179.8

 179.1

 178.4

 177.8

 177.1

STORAGE

-0.4

-0.3

-0.4

-0.6

-0.7

-0.7

-0.7

-0.7

-0.6

-0.3

-0.4

-0.4

-0.4

-0.4

-0.4

-0.3

-0.3

-0.5

-0.6

-0.7

-0.5

-0.4

-0.3

-0.4

-0.3

-0.5

-0.6

-0.7

-0.7

-0.6

-0.7

CHANGE

60

74

53

20

53

27

44

32

21

68

29

34

51

39

47

61

60

72

60

32

48

43

80

44

80

75

98

47

45

83

60

INFLOW

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

MADERA

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

SPILL

 0

 0

 0

 93

 148

 147

 147

 146

 85

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 100

 141

 140

 47

 0

 0

 0

 0

 97

 137

 136

 136

 135

 134

FRIANT-KERN

 34

 34

 27

 26

 31

 16

 13

 7

 17

 24

 25

 30

 21

 10

 17

 17

 15

 21

 21

 21

 10

 10

 20

 11

 33

 24

 20

 34

 25

 28

 35

C.F.S.

 .38

 .39

 .30

 .30

 .35

 .18

 .15

 .08

 .20

 .28

 .29

 .35

 .24

 .11

 .20

 .20

 .17

 .24

 .25

 .25

 .12

 .12

 .23

 .13

 .39

 .28

 .23

 .40

 .30

 .33

 .42

INCHES

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .01

 .24

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .02

 .02

 .00

 .03

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

PRECIP

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

MAY 2015 MILLERTON LAKE DAILY OPERATIONS RUN DATE: June 1, 2015

IN LAKE

EVAPORATION

INCHES

C.F.S.

COMPUTED*

1000 ACRE-FEET

RELEASE - C.F.S. 

TOTALS -15.4 1,640 0 1,969 0 677 7.86 .32

ACRE-FEET -15,372 3,253 0 3,906 0 1,343

COMMENTS:

* COMPUTED INFLOW IS THE SUM OF CHANGE IN STORAGE, RELEASES, PUMPING AND EVAPORATION.

SUMMARY

RELEASE (ACRE-FEET)

CANALS

FRIANT-KERN

MADERA

 3,906

 0 17,281

PRECIPITATION

THIS MONTH =

JULY 1, 2014 TO DATE = 7.67

 192.5

 13,375 0.32

CANALS

AT FRIANT

TOTAL RELEASES

OUTLET

 205

 205

 205

 205

 205

 205

 212

 220

 220

 220

 220

 220

 219

 219

 219

 219

 219

 219

 219

 219

 219

 219

 219

 219

 219

 219

 220

 220

 226

 236

 233

RIVER

 6,743

 13,375

RIVER
§ 84.230 How and when must I identify workplaces? ( a ) You must identify all known workplaces under each ED award. A failure to do so is a violation of your drug-free workplace requirements. You may identify the workplaces— ( 1 ) To the ED official that is making the award, either at the time of application or upon award; or
( 2 ) In documents that you keep on file in your offices during the performance of the award, in which case you must make the information available for inspection upon request by ED officials or their designated representatives.
( b ) Your workplace identification for an award must include the actual address of buildings (or parts of buildings) or other sites where work under the award takes place. Categorical descriptions may be used (*e.g.,* all vehicles of a mass transit authority or State highway department while in operation, State employees in each local unemployment office, performers in concert halls or radio studios).
( c ) If you identified workplaces to the ED awarding official at the time of application or award, as described in paragraph (a)(1) of this section, and any workplace that you identified changes during the performance of the award, you must inform the ED awarding official.
(Authority: E.O.s 12549 and 12689; 20 U.S.C. 1082, 1094, 1221e-3 and 3474; and Sec. 2455, Pub. L. 103-355, 108 Stat. 3243 at 3327)
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

NO. 03-02-00301-CV

Teresa L. Maxwell, Appellant

v.

Alex Charles Maxwell, Appellee

FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF BASTROP COUNTY, 335TH JUDICIAL DISTRICT

NO. 23,067, HONORABLE TERRY FLENNIKEN, JUDGE PRESIDING

On May 10, 2002, we received appellant=s notice of appeal in the form of a copy of the 

final divorce decree marked Aappeal.@ On May 20, we were informed that appellant=s trial counsel was 

discharged at the end of the trial proceedings and was not appointed as appellate counsel. On August 5, 

we sent appellant a letter informing her that she was required to file an amended notice of appeal and 

arrange to pay for the clerk=s record no later than August 19, and that her appeal would be subject to 

dismissal for want of prosecution if she failed to do so. To date, appellant has not responded to our 

communications.

We therefore dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution. Tex. R. App. P. 42.3(b).

__________________________________________

David Puryear, Justice

Before Chief Justice Aboussie, Justices Patterson and Puryear

Dismissed for Want of Prosecution
Filed: September 12, 2002

Do Not Publish
### §2568. Payments to Humphrey Institute and Dirksen Center; procedures applicable

No payment may be made under sections 2566 to 2569 of this title except upon an application at such time, in such manner, and containing or accompanied by such information as the Secretary may require.

(Pub. L. 95–270, §3, Apr. 27, 1978, 92 Stat. 220; Pub. L. 96–88, title III, §301(a)(1), title V, §507, Oct. 17, 1979, 93 Stat. 677, 692.)

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date

Section effective Oct. 1, 1978, see section 4(d) of Pub. L. 95–270, set out as a note under section 2566 of this title.

#### Transfer of Functions

"Secretary", meaning Secretary of Education, substituted in text for "Commissioner" pursuant to sections 301(a)(1) and 507 of Pub. L. 96–88, which are classified to sections 3441(a)(1) and 3507 of this title and which transferred functions of Commissioner of Education to Secretary of Education.