alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### Maria TORRES, Petitioner, v. Alberto R. GONZALES, Attorney General, Respondent.

No. 06-70841.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted July 17, 2006.*

Decided July 21, 2006.

Bruce C. Wong, Esq., Duxford Law Group, San Francisco, CA, for Petitioner.

Ronald E. LeFevre, Chief Counsel, San Francisco, CA, John S. Hogan, Esq., Washington, DC, for Respondent.

Before: B. FLETCHER, HAWKINS and THOMAS, Circuit Judges.

*

 This panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. *See*Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

MEMORANDUM **

This is a petition for review of the denial of petitioner’s motion to reopen immigration proceedings. Respondent’s motion for summary disposition of this petition for review is granted because a review of the record shows that Board of Immigration Appeals properly denied petitioner’s motion to reopen as untimely. *See*8 C.F.R. § 1003.2(c)(2) (stating that motions to reopen before the Board of Immigration Appeals must be filed within 90 days after the date of the final administrative decision was rendered in the proceedings sought to be reopened); *see also United States v. Hooton,*693 F.2d 857, 858 (9th Cir.1982) (per curiam) (stating standard for summary disposition). Accordingly, this petition for review is denied.

All other pending motions are denied as moot. The temporary stay of removal shall continue in effect until issuance of the mandate.

PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED.

**

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
# National D.A.R.E. Day, 2011 

As a Nation, we must work to raise a drug-free and healthy generation of 21st-century leaders. Substance abuse and its consequences have grave impacts on our society—destroying lives, tearing apart families, and introducing drug-related violence to our neighborhoods. Young Americans especially need the help and support of caring adults to resist pressure to use drugs or engage in other harmful activities.

We must address the use of illegal drugs, tobacco, and alcohol, as well as prescription drug abuse, among youth by building knowledge of the warning signs and risks associated with substance abuse. Though parents must take the lead in teaching the value of drug-free living, friends, mentors, teachers, and neighbors also have roles to play in helping adolescents understand the dangers of alcohol and drug addiction. By joining together to tackle this issue and encourage positive behavior, communities can help young people reject the pressure to try illicit substances or engage in other hazardous activity. I encourage students, caregivers, and other concerned individuals to visit www.DrugAbuse.gov for educational materials on the health effects and consequences of drug abuse and addiction.

Law enforcement is often a critical partner in implementing community-based drug abuse prevention strategies. The Drug Abuse Resistance Education (D.A.R.E.) program, in addition to many other prevention efforts across our country, serves as a resource in helping educate young people on how to resist peer pressure and refrain from drug use and violence.

My Administration is committed to reducing drug use and its consequences through a balanced approach that includes prevention, treatment, and law enforcement, and we are supporting national efforts to prevent drug use before it starts. As we work to reduce substance abuse and the great damage it causes in our communities, we will make our country stronger and our people healthier and safer.

NOW, THEREFORE, I, BARACK OBAMA, President of the United States of America, by virtue of the authority vested in me by the Constitution and the laws of the United States, do hereby proclaim April 7, 2011, as National D.A.R.E. Day. I call upon all Americans to observe this day with appropriate programs and activities.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand this sixth day of April, in the year of our Lord two thousand eleven, and of the Independence of the United States of America the two hundred and thirty-fifth.

[FR Doc. 2011-8727

Billing code 3195-W1-P
JAMAL CHE GLENN,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellee.

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO 

FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND 

DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED

CASE NO. 1D14-5235

_____________________________/

Opinion filed October 4, 2016.

An appeal from the Circuit Court for Duval County.

Tatiana Salvador, Judge.

Jamal Che Glenn, pro se, Appellant.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, and Jennifer J. Moore, Assistant Attorney 

General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Appellant challenges the trial court’s order summarily denying his Rule 

3.850 motion and imposing sanctions for frivolous filings. Appellant pleaded 

guilty to murder and robbery on the advice of his counsel. He now claims that his 

counsel was (or should have been) aware of a scientific report supporting his claim 

of innocence. The trial court summarily dismissed the claim as untimely, noting 

Appellant filed his motion more than two years after his judgment and sentence 

became final.
2

Rule 3.850’s two-year limitations period includes an exception for situations 

in which “the facts on which the claim is predicated were unknown to the movant 

or the movant’s attorney and could not have been ascertained by the exercise of 

due diligence.” In that instance, the deadline is two years from “the time the new 

facts were or could have been discovered with the exercise of due diligence.” Id.; 

see also Vann v. State, 605 So. 2d 920, 921 (Fla. 1st DCA 1992) (finding exception 

applicable when appellant learned of his counsel’s misadvice more than two years 

after appellant’s conviction became final).

Because Appellant’s motion was filed within two years after Appellant 

alleges he first could have discovered the pertinent facts, and because his motion 

otherwise is facially sufficient, we reverse and remand for the trial court to either 

attach records conclusively refuting Appellant’s claim or to conduct further 

proceedings under Rule 3.850. Because the trial court’s order imposing sanctions 

was based in part on its summary denial of Appellant’s 3.850 motion, we reverse 

the sanctions order as well. If the trial court later concludes that the 3.850 motion 

was baseless (even if facially sufficient), the court may consider whether to impose 

sanctions again. 

REVERSED AND REMANDED

OSTERHAUS, WINSOR, and M.K. THOMAS, JJ., CONCUR.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY ELEV

 121.88

 122.38

 122.61

 123.18

 122.66

 124.03

 123.48

 122.36

 122.63

 122.79

 123.04

 122.44

 122.12

 122.15

 123.01

 124.43

 123.27

 123.18

 122.56

 123.29

 122.90

 121.85

 122.71

 122.98

 123.72

 123.74

 123.13

 123.14

 123.14

 122.93

 122.35

 7,291

 7,512

 7,616

 7,876

 7,638

 8,276

 8,017

 7,503

 7,625

 7,697

 7,810

 7,539

 7,395

 7,409

 7,796

 8,476

 7,918

 7,876

 7,593

 7,927

 7,746

 7,278

 7,661

 7,782

 8,129

 8,139

 7,852

 7,857

 7,857

 7,760

 7,499

STORAGE

-424

+221

+104

+260

-238

+638

-259

-514

+122

+72

+113

-271

-144

+14

+387

+680

-558

-42

-283

+334

-181

-468

+383

+121

+347

+10

-287

+5

+0

-97

-261

CHANGE

1,576

1,863

1,832

1,881

1,623

2,072

1,619

1,490

1,839

1,814

1,833

1,640

1,707

1,784

1,960

2,116

1,525

1,760

1,634

1,940

1,672

1,486

1,954

1,830

1,920

1,729

1,602

1,734

1,737

1,714

1,626

INFLOW

 1,745

 1,707

 1,542

 1,705

 1,698

 1,705

 1,705

 1,071

 1,732

 1,733

 1,570

 1,731

 1,734

 1,732

 1,565

 1,605

 1,761

 1,670

 1,732

 1,727

 1,718

 508

 10

 10

 10

 10

 10

 10

 10

 10

 10

POWER

 0

 0

 192

 0

 0

 0

 0

 633

 0

 0

 160

 0

 0

 0

 155

 123

 0

 66

 0

 0

 0

 1,168

 1,706

 1,714

 1,690

 1,669

 1,692

 1,676

 1,682

 1,708

 1,703

SPILL

 45

 45

 45

 45

 45

 45

 45

 45

 45

 45

 45

 45

 45

 45

 45

 45

 45

 45

 45

 45

 45

 45

 45

 45

 45

 45

 45

 45

 45

 45

 45

HATCHERY

 0

 0

 1

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 1

 1

 1

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 1

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

C.F.S.

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

JANUARY 2019 LAKE NATOMA DAILY OPERATIONS RUN DATE: February 1, 2019

IN LAKE

EVAP

C.F.S.

COMPUTED*

ACRE-FEET

RELEASE - C.F.S.

TOTALS -216 54,512 35,486 17,737 1,395 5

ACRE-FEET -216 108,125 70,386 35,181 2,767 10

COMMENTS:

* COMPUTED INFLOW IS THE SUM OF CHANGE IN STORAGE, RELEASES AND EVAPORATION.

SUMMARY

RELEASES (ACRE-FEET)

POWER 70,386

SPILL 35,181

FOLSOM SOUTH CANAL

HATCHERY

 0

 2,767

 7,715

FOLSOM

SOUTH 

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

(1)

(1) INCHES OF EVAPORATION TAKEN FROM FOLSOM PAN.

RELEASES (ACRE-FEET) 

TOTAL 108,334
List of Reports / Table of Contents

1. LD-C-50

a. LD-C-50 - CHPS Testing 2010

b. LD-C-50 - CHPS Testing 2008

c. LD-C-50 - SRC Testing Summary

d. LD-C-50 - SRC Testing 1994

e. LD-C-50 - Toxicological Assessment 2010

f. LD-C-50 – Swypes Test 2012

2. LD-R-50

a. LD-R-50 - CHPS Testing 2012

b. LD-R-50 - CHPS Testing 2010

c. LD-R-50 - SRC Testing 2009

d. LD-R-50 - Toxicological Assessment 2009

3. MD-C-200

a. MD-C-200 - CHPS Tests 2012

b. MD-C-200 - CHPS Tests 2010

c. MD-C-200 - VOC Certificate 2010

d. MD-C-200 - Swypes Test 2012

4. MD-R-200

a. MD-R-200 - CHPS Tests 2010

b. MD-R-200 - VOC Certificate 2010

5. MD-R-210

a. MD-R-210 - CHPS Tests 2012

6. Technical Data Sheets (TDS)

a. LD-C-50 Technical Data Sheet USA

b. LD-C-50 v2 Classic Max Technical Data Sheet

c. LD-R-50 Technical Data Sheet 

d. MD-C-200 US Technical Data Sheet

e. MD-R-200 Technical Data Sheet

f. MD-R-210 Technical Data Sheet 

7. Material Safety Data Sheets (MSDS)

a. A Side - March 7 2011

b. LD-C-50 Resin - June 21 2012

c. LD-C-50v2 Foam - Oct 29 2012

d. LD-C-50v2 Resin - Oct 29 2012

e. LD-R-50 Foam - July 9 2012

f. LD-R-50 Resin - Oct 31 2012

g. MD-C-200 A Side - Aug 12 2010

h. MD-C-200 Foam - Dec 3 201

i. MD-C-200 S Resin - Dec 13 2010

j. MD-C-200 W Resin - Dec 13 2010

k. MD-R-200 Foam - July 28 2009

l. MD-R-200 Resin - July 19 2012

m. MD-R-210 Foam - Oct 27 2011

n. MD-R-210 Resin - Oct 25 2011

8. In-Plant Testing

a. In-plant Testing - 2008 Report

b. In-plant Testing - 2010 Report
1

Summary of the Proposal to

Reclassify/Delist the Gray Wolf

	
















 
!
"
 
#




#	



	

$
%&






'#

&



(
)*

	
#	


#


%+

	




	




,-

%!


$



#	
$#!




	
#

 %

+





	


.%&%/$
&
	

(&
	


)



#


#



'#

&



%+










/

"
#





#	

.
&


 
0
%!


 
0


#	



.


&
 
0
#	


-1









&
%

The Proposal

+
&
	







()

#



	









2
#
(3)



#4


	
#


5

#

















	
(6)








#





2#




	







%

+




##7

#
8(9:&)


,
&
%9:&













#




%'
9:&











'#

&



%

+
$


,-
$9
:&
#


#	


9-&9- 
$
 
#%	
#


#




#


0


 





U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service
2








#%	
9:&







#








%+

	



()






	

-#

9-&

9- 
#$






 
	
%

$	
 





#


%

+


$9
:&
#


	





;

<-=
 
%$

#

	





7
#

8

7


8



/








0##	
%

+





&
	

-





#	

	
#
	




	
	




#
%

+
$

$9


:&
#


	




$#>
#!

. $#1


4



 
0
%+
&
	

2

#	


##	



#
#




 	


#

$#

#


%$




<

:-

!








0

%

+
&

$9
:&
#


#	



4

 
0

+
0 
0
%+

	





#





%$	


0#




0





0


#%

&


9
:&
#


	




,
&









#
%

Status of Wolves in Each DPS (Basis for Service Proposal)

$


,-
$9:&%+



	




.


&


	
 
%9
*
	
3
/





	
	
#

	
(
#)




		

 
	





3?%!







	

 
!
"

3

:- 
#%9#

*





3?	


 
%3?	
$
3@
.
:
 
#(#

3!
"
)





3%+
$
 
#






	





	
%&#


	




&9--

# 


1%

$

$9:&%+


	
	


.%&%"
- 





	
*%!


	
#



	





#A

 

!
<

:-
%!





	



#


	




"
-






#




%$




	





#(	




	

)









%

$
	




#
$

9:&%!

 

	

#1

@%1




@6	
?
-%+



0









%!
1
!







	



#
-

%+



	
<

:-

	
	
%!

<


	

#



#
-%+-




	



3
-



%

$	



$

9:&
$#>
#



	


0#

	
%	
 



$




#





#





%

&

$9:&

+
5

	

 
0
$"

	
:


	


##




 
0
	

#
%+#

#


#

	
&

( 
0
)#	





3%6	





33




3%




	


0


#

#





%



$9:&






	

	


#	





.%&%#
	
#	





	
%

!4

&
	




	
#

	





9:&%
4

Special Rules

.

'#

&


















#	
#

#


0
0


	


%+








 

#
#


#	

#
-	
	




%

+
&
	

#






%+










9:&






7-
8(-)	




&
	

	


	

%

! 
#$
9-&9-







0#


 
	
#
#
#	

#
-

	
	

-


%








$

9:&%!	





0









	





-





%&




	



	

"
- 

&


0


%

Evaluating Existing and Future Threats to Gray Wolves

$




#

#






0
	





#



2

AB	











B

C
B
D

0#

B





%$
-


	



-#






#	
%

Public Comment and Information

+
&
	


	


-#






#	
%&



&
	




A




,
&
 
0
B




#
#

B#
B


&
	





-#

%

1









&
	




	
	



63%

&


A

1
'

+


$1


3'E

:>E0*@@"6

  ?*



A"<$>,/1> '+&F/$&%>=

0

A@6363
5

!

#




	




D

&
	

2%!

#






	
	


B
#

D

(




	#
D


#33)%+





#
#




	#
&
	

2$



#







%

+
.%&%/$
&
	

#


!

ACC
%%#	C%!	##





&
	

2#

2

A

.%&%/$
&
	



$"
	


/

9	


/&
# ???@



"<$>,/ !,F/$&%>=


&
	

2$!

,
@3*6*66*%
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

DAY ELEV

 123.76

 123.82

 124.21

 124.42

 123.84

 123.64

 123.06

 123.46

 123.18

 122.89

 122.57

 122.27

 122.32

 122.29

 122.33

 122.21

 122.05

 122.09

 121.93

 122.20

 122.09

 122.38

 122.22

 122.27

 122.39

 122.27

 122.44

 122.45

 122.52

 122.42

 8,148

 8,176

 8,366

 8,471

 8,186

 8,092

 7,819

 8,007

 7,876

 7,742

 7,598

 7,463

 7,485

 7,472

 7,490

 7,436

 7,364

 7,382

 7,312

 7,431

 7,382

 7,512

 7,440

 7,463

 7,517

 7,463

 7,539

 7,544

 7,575

 7,530

STORAGE

+122

+28

+190

+105

-285

-94

-273

+188

-131

-134

-144

-135

+22

-13

+18

-54

-72

+18

-70

+119

-49

+130

-72

+23

+54

-54

+76

+5

+31

-45

CHANGE

1,423

1,183

1,087

928

725

827

736

972

812

812

805

811

889

868

885

852

839

883

840

936

847

939

841

885

898

850

910

884

898

761

INFLOW

 1,297

 1,105

 928

 811

 805

 811

 810

 813

 814

 816

 815

 817

 815

 813

 813

 819

 813

 811

 812

 813

 808

 809

 815

 810

 808

 814

 809

 808

 809

 713

POWER

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

SPILL

 40

 40

 40

 40

 40

 40

 40

 40

 40

 40

 40

 40

 40

 40

 40

 40

 40

 40

 40

 40

 40

 40

 40

 40

 40

 40

 40

 40

 40

 40

HATCHERY

 4

 4

 3

 4

 4

 3

 4

 4

 4

 4

 3

 2

 3

 2

 3

 0

 2

 3

 3

 3

 4

 4

 2

 3

 3

 3

 3

 3

 3

 1

C.F.S.

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

SEPTEMBER 2015 LAKE NATOMA DAILY OPERATIONS RUN DATE: October 1, 2015

IN LAKE

EVAP

C.F.S.

COMPUTED*

ACRE-FEET

RELEASE - C.F.S.

TOTALS -496 26,826 25,154 0 1,200 91

ACRE-FEET -496 53,209 49,893 0 2,380 180

COMMENTS:

* COMPUTED INFLOW IS THE SUM OF CHANGE IN STORAGE, RELEASES AND EVAPORATION.

SUMMARY

RELEASES (ACRE-FEET)

POWER 49,893

SPILL 0

FOLSOM SOUTH CANAL

HATCHERY

 1,250

 2,380

 8,026

FOLSOM

SOUTH 

CANAL

 20

 20

 20

 20

 20

 20

 20

 20

 20

 20

 20

 20

 20

 20

 20

 20

 20

 20

 20

 20

 20

 20

 20

 20

 20

 20

 20

 30

 30

 30

 630

 1,250

(1)

(1) INCHES OF EVAPORATION TAKEN FROM FOLSOM PAN.

RELEASES (ACRE-FEET)

TOTAL 53,523
###### Editorial Note on Part 40

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 40 appear by T.D. ATF-460, 66 FR 39094-39096, July 27, 2001; T.D. ATF-464, 66 FR 43479, Aug. 20, 2001; and T.D. TTB-91, 76 FR 5479, Feb. 1, 2011.

#### §§ 40.34-40.36 [Reserved]
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY

 64,191

 63,955

 63,666

 63,195

 63,237

 62,723

 62,088

 61,422

 60,755

 60,077

 59,365

 58,666

 57,913

 57,119

 56,313

 55,487

 54,639

 53,764

 52,856

 51,937

 51,309

 50,929

 50,608

 49,933

 49,173

 48,570

 47,896

 46,945

 45,895

 45,001

 43,987

 97,586

 97,701

 97,737

 97,730

 97,443

 97,586

 97,629

 97,643

 97,705

 97,730

 97,722

 97,722

 97,722

 97,722

 97,722

 97,737

 97,737

 97,744

 97,737

 97,730

 97,557

 97,263

 96,882

 96,753

 96,653

 96,452

 96,302

 96,394

 96,581

 96,653

 96,767

STORAGE - A.F. 

 161,777

 161,656

 161,403

 160,925

 160,680

 160,309

 159,717

 159,065

 158,460

 157,807

 157,087

 156,388

 155,635

 154,841

 154,035

 153,224

 152,376

 151,508

 150,593

 149,667

 148,866

 148,192

 147,490

 146,686

 145,826

 145,022

 144,198

 143,339

 142,476

 141,654

 140,754

1,093

894

836

963

834

931

906

804

911

1,008

1,022

1,024

951

1,097

723

852

878

884

1,295

1,161

1,202

783

846

1,106

1,239

1,083

1,031

1,248

920

960

1,404

1,054

833

708

722

710

744

608

475

606

679

659

672

571

697

317

443

450

446

834

694

798

443

492

701

805

678

616

815

485

546

950

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

JULY 2000 FULL NATURAL FLOW AT NEW MELONES DAM RUN DATE: 08/21/2000

TOTALS -21,101 20,251

* October 1, 40,168

 965.4

 967.1

 968.5

 969.9

 971.3

 972.8

 974.0

 974.9

 976.1

 977.5

 978.8

 980.1

 981.2

 982.6

 983.3

 984.1

 985.0

 985.9

 987.6

 988.9

 990.5

 991.4

 992.4

 993.8

 995.4

 996.7

 997.9

 999.5

 1,000.5

 1,001.6

 1,003.5

DONNELLS

RES

BEARDSLEY

RES

1999 TO DATE

NEW

MELONES

INFLOW

C.F.S

NATURAL

RIVER

C.F.S

ACCUM *

FULL

NATURAL

1000 A.F.

RESERVOIR

TOTAL

-78

-121

-253

-478

-245

-371

-592

-652

-605

-653

-720

-699

-753

-794

-806

-811

-848

-868

-915

-926

-801

-674

-702

-804

-860

-804

-824

-859

-863

-822

-900

CHANGE

A.F. C.F.S.

-39

-61

-128

-241

-124

-187

-298

-329

-305

-329

-363

-352

-380

-400

-406

-409

-428

-438

-461

-467

-404

-340

-354

-405

-434

-405

-415

-433

-435

-414

-454
### InThe Matter Of: 

### SERVED: August 3, 2016 U.S. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION OFFICE OF HEARINGS WASHINGTON, DC
DocketNo. FAA-2015-0642 RUGBY AVIATION ) ) 

### ) ) ) Case No. 2014NM010021 Respondent 

### ORDERDISMISSING PROCEEDING OnNovember 19, 2015, an Order Setting Litigation Deadlines and Hearing Dates was filed. Among otherthings, this Order set an August 30,2016 Pre-Hearing Status Conference and the Hearing for November 2-3, 2016, in Seattle, Washington. OnAugust 3, 2016, the parties filed ajointNotice ofSettlement and Withdrawal of Appeal, stating that "the parties have reached a settlement" and "accordingly, the Respondent
... hereby withdraws their appeal herewith and Complainant withdraws their complaint." Afterhaving reviewed the case file, all pleadings and motions, all relevant caselaw, statutes, regulations, rules, and authority, and being fully advised; 

### IT ISHEREBY ORDERED: 1. The Pre-Hearing Status Conference set for August 30, 2016, is cancelled. 2. The Hearing set for November 2-3, 2016, in Seattle, Washington is cancelled. 3. Pursuantto 14 C.F.R. 

### § 13.215, the parties have withdrawn their respective pleadings, andthis proceeding is dismissed with prejudice.

Attachment: Service List

### DocketNo. FAA-2015-0642 (Civil Penalty Action) 

### SERVICE LIST - BYU.S. 

### MAIL
ORIGINAL & ONE COPY 

### Federal Aviation Administration 800 Independence Avenue, S.W. Washington, DC 20591 Attention: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430 Wilbur Wright Building-Suite 2Wl000 1



### Mr. David Shayne 

### Complainant's Counsel Federal AviationAdministration Northwest Mountain Region (ANM-7) 1601 Lind Avenue Southwest Renton, WA 98057 TEL: 425-227-2165 FAX: 425-227-1007 Mr. J.C. Becker 

### Respondent's Counsel PO Box 13253 Mill Creek, WA 98082-1253 TEL: 425-280-2004 Judge J.E. Sullivan 

### U.S. Administrative LawJudge Office ofHearings, M-20 U.S. Department ofTransportation 1200 NewJersey Avenue, S.E. (E11-310) Washington, DC 20590 TEL: 202-366-6941 FAX: 202-366-7536 ONE COPY

1 Service was byU.S. Mail. For service in person orby expedited courier, use the following address: Federal. Aviation Administration, 600 Independence Avenue, S.W., Wilbur Wright Building-Suite 2W1000, Washington, DC 20591; Attention: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430.
<PAGE>
                                   EXHIBIT 21

                        PENNROCK FINANCIAL SERVICES CORP.
                         SUBSIDIARIES OF THE REGISTRANT

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                    Subsidiary                                State of Incorporation or Organization
----------------------------------------------------     --------------------------------------------------
<S>                                                      <C>
Blue Ball National Bank                                  National Banking Association
1060 Main St.
Blue Ball, PA 17506

       PennRock Insurance Group, Inc.                    Pennsylvania
       100 West Main St.
       Terre Hill, PA 17581

The National Advisory Group, Inc.                        Pennsylvania
715 Twining Rd.
Dresher, PA 19025

       National Actuarial Consultants, Ltd.              Pennsylvania
       715 Twining Rd.
       Dresher, PA 19025

       National Financial Advisors, Inc.                 Pennsylvania
       715 Twining Rd.
       Dresher, PA 19025

       NFA Brokerage Services, Inc.                      Pennsylvania
       715 Twining Rd.
       Dresher, PA 19025

       National Shareholder Services, Inc.               Pennsylvania
       715 Twining Rd.
       Dresher, PA 19025
</TABLE>
###### Editorial Note on Part 478

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 478 appear by T.D. ATF-411, 64 FR 17291, Apr. 9, 1999, T.D. ATF-487, 68 FR 3750, Jan. 24, 2003, and ATF-11F, 73 FR 57240, Oct. 2, 2008.

#### § 478.46 Insufficient fee.

If an application is filed with an insufficient fee, the application and any fee submitted will be returned to the applicant.

(18 U.S.C. 847 (84 Stat. 959); 18 U.S.C. 926 (82 Stat. 1226))

[T.D. ATF-200, 50 FR 10498, Mar. 15, 1985]
Editorial Note on Part 70
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 70 appear by T.D. ATF-450, 66 FR 29022-29030, May 29, 2001.

§ 70.244 Payroll period. For purpose of determining the amount of wages, salary or other income exempt from levy under 26 U.S.C. 6334(a)(9): ( a ) *Regularly used calendar periods.* In the case of wages, salary or other income paid to the taxpayer on the basis of an established calendar period regularly used by the employer or other person levied upon for payroll or payment purpose (e.g., daily, weekly, biweekly, semimonthly, or monthly), that period is the taxpayer's payroll period.
( b ) *Amounts paid on recurrent but irregular basis.* In the case of wages, salary, or other income paid to the taxpayer on a recurrent but irregular basis, the first day of the taxpayer's payroll period is that day following the day upon which the wages, salary, or other income were last paid to the taxpayer. The last day of the payroll period is that day upon which the current payment becomes payable to him or her. However, in any case in which: ( 1 ) Amounts are paid to the taxpayer on a recurrent but irregular basis, and
( 2 ) The last payment was paid to the taxpayer more than 60 days before the current payment becomes payable, the current payment will be deemed a one-time payment (*see* paragraph (c) of this section).
( c ) *Nonrecurrent payments.* In the case of wages, salary or other income paid to the taxpayer on a one-time basis, the taxpayer's payroll period is deemed to be weekly (*i.e.,* the 1-week period ending on the day of payment).
(26 U.S.C. 6334)