alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 31.1

                                  CERTIFICATION

I, Jeffrey F. Joseph, Chief Executive Officer of Presidential Realty Corporation
(the "Company") certify that:

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of the Company;

2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any
   untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact
   necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances
   under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to
   the period covered by this quarterly report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
   information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all
   material respects the financial condition, results of operations and
   cash flows of the Company as of, and for, the periods presented in
   this quarterly report;

4. The Company's other certifying officers and I are responsible for
   establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as
   defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the
   Company and we have:

      a)   designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that
           material information relating to the Company, including its
           consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those
           entities, particularly during the period in which this quarterly
           report is being prepared;

      b)   evaluated the effectiveness of the Company's disclosure controls and
           procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the
           effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the
           end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation;
           and

      c)   disclosed in this report any changes in the Company's internal
           control over financial reporting that occurred during the Company's
           most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is
           reasonably likely to materially affect, the Company's internal
           control over financial reporting; and

5. The Company's other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our
   most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to
   the Company's auditors and the Audit Committee of the Company's Board of
   Directors:

      a)  all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
          operation of internal control over financial reporting which are
          reasonably likely to adversely affect the Company's ability to record,
          process, summarize and report financial information; and

      b)  any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
          employees who have a significant role in the Company's internal
          control over financial reporting.



  DATE:   August 9, 2006          By: /s/ Jeffrey F. Joseph
                                      --------------------------
                                      Jeffrey F. Joseph
                                      Chief Executive Officer
#### Trojan Publishing Corporation, Appellant, v. Manufacturers Trust Company, Defendant, and Commercial National Bank & Trust Company of New York et al., Respondents. (Action No. 1.) Arrow Publications, Inc., Appellant, v. Manufacturers Trust Company, Defendant, and Commercial National Bank & Trust Company of New York et al., Respondents. (Action No. 2.)

—Motion for leave to appeal to the Court of Appeals denied, with $10 costs. Present — Peck, P. J., Glennon, Cohn, Callahan and Yan Yoorhis, JJ. [See *ante,*p. 843.]
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

DAY ELEV

 218.64

 218.77

 218.59

 218.67

 218.72

 218.99

 218.67

 218.16

 218.81

 219.25

 219.14

 219.55

 219.69

 220.76

 221.74

 222.16

 223.47

 223.23

 223.49

 223.60

 223.45

 223.06

 222.40

 223.39

 222.56

 222.50

 223.00

 223.03

 39,674

 40,002

 39,548

 39,750

 39,876

 40,559

 39,750

 38,470

 40,103

 41,221

 40,940

 41,990

 42,351

 45,132

 47,703

 48,810

 52,303

 51,661

 52,357

 52,652

 52,250

 51,206

 49,447

 52,089

 49,873

 49,713

 51,046

 51,126

STORAGE

-606

+328

-454

+202

+126

+683

-809

-1,280

+1,633

+1,118

-281

+1,050

+361

+2,781

+2,571

+1,107

+3,493

-642

+696

+295

-402

-1,044

-1,759

+2,642

-2,216

-160

+1,333

+80

CHANGE

3,497

3,489

3,502

3,505

3,507

3,511

3,520

3,524

3,528

3,511

3,509

3,503

3,491

3,473

3,430

3,396

3,368

3,350

3,362

3,353

3,358

3,149

3,186

3,268

3,170

3,114

3,110

3,211

PUMPING

 7,216

 7,311

 7,509

 7,530

 7,015

 7,015

 6,843

 7,450

 7,674

 7,818

 7,050

 6,717

 6,811

 5,416

 5,383

 5,456

 5,252

 4,146

 3,350

 3,898

 4,096

 3,978

 4,505

 4,402

 4,155

 3,939

 3,784

 3,854

PUMPING

 7,025

 6,484

 6,637

 5,870

 6,717

 6,527

 7,286

 6,894

 5,777

 5,880

 6,870

 6,755

 7,063

 7,560

 7,560

 6,590

 3,877

 3,622

 3,603

 3,600

 3,583

 3,580

 3,567

 3,544

 3,540

 3,540

 3,520

 3,520

PUMPING

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

GEN.

*

-268

-246

-259

-596

-376

-266

-229

-139

+559

+511

+59

+133

+286

+569

+506

+378

+359

-29

+179

+320

+154

+81

+137

+1,010

-812

+77

+286

+194

OR

UNITED STATES 

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION

CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT

CONSOLIDATED STATE-FEDERAL O'NEILL FOREBAY March 31, 2017

DAILY OPERATIONS

FEBRUARY 2017 RUN DATE:

IN LAKE GEN.

ACRE-FEET O'NEILL

RELEASE - C.F.S. 

TOTALS +10,846 94,895 0 150,591 159,573 +2,578

ACRE-FEET +10,846 188,224 0 298,697 316,513

SUMMARY

 26

RELEASE (ACRE-FEET)

O'NEILL GEN. 0

SAN LUIS PUMP 298,697 26

 40,280

DOS AMIGOS PUMP 316,513

DELIVERIES 

S. LUIS O'NEILL

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

CALIF. DOS AMIGOS

AQUEDUCT

10,706

10,718

10,674

10,593

10,664

10,641

10,431

10,314

10,187

10,239

10,209

10,367

10,279

10,336

10,303

8,831

7,163

4,124

3,762

3,974

3,965

3,801

3,862

5,000

4,220

4,207

4,579

4,022

 218,171

 432,742

S. LUIS

DELIV.

GAINS(+)

LOSS(-)

C.F.S.

INFLOW - C.F.S.

STATE OF CALIFORNIA

THE RESOURCES AGENCY

DEPARTMENT OF WATER RESOURCES

STATE WATER PROJECT

TOTAL 615,236

5,113

* DAILY DEL. FIGURES UNAVAILABLE. TOT. DEL. IS INCLUDED IN COMPUTING MONTHLY TOTALS

Table 18
* Pursuant to Local Rule 47.5, the court has determined that this

opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in Local Rule 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

__________________ No. 96-60261 Summary Calendar

__________________

CLYDE ASHLEY, JR., Petitioner-Appellant,

versus
CHRISTINE HOUSTON, MIKE MOORE, RAYMOND ROBERTS, EDDIE LUCAS, COMMISSIONER, MISSISSIPPI DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, Respondents-Appellees.

_________________________________________________________________

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Mississippi

USDC No. 4:94CV178-D-0

_________________________________________________________________ September 20, 1996 Before JONES, DeMOSS AND PARKER, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: *

Clyde Ashley, Jr., Mississippi prisoner # 47208, seeks to appeal the denial of his Fed. R. Civ. P. 60(b) motion to reconsider
the judgment of th e district court denying habeas corpus relief.
Any motion for an out-of-time appeal is unnecessary. Ashley’s first notice of appeal was timely as to the January 31, 1995 Rule
60(b) order. The first appeal was dismissed as to the finalNo. 96-60261 -2- judgment only; we now address the appeal from the denial of the Rule 60(b) motion. Ashley argues that the disciplinary committee 's failure to
hold a hearing within ten days of the disciplinary report violated
due process and that his earned time was confiscated without proper authority. We have reviewed the record and the brief and found no
reversible error. We affirm for the reasons stated by the district

court. A shley v. Houston et al. , No. 4:94CV178-D-O (5th Cir. Jan. 31, 1995).

AFFIRMED.
**EXHIBIT 32.2**

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT**

**TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

In connection with the Annual Report of The Aristotle Corporation (the “Company”) on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2006, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”) on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Dean T. Johnson, Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge: 

 

|   | 1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and |
|--------|----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

|   | 2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. |
|--------|----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

 April 2, 2007

 

/s/ Dean T. Johnson *

 

Dean T. Johnson

Vice President and Chief Financial Officer 

 

* A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the SEC or its staff upon request.
Editorial Note on Part 70
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 70 appear by T.D. ATF-450, 66 FR 29022-29030, May 29, 2001.

§ 70.253 Periods of limitation on suits by persons other than taxpayers. ( a ) *General rule.* No suit or proceeding, except as otherwise provided in 26 U.S.C. 6532(c)(2) and paragraph (b) of this section, under 26 U.S.C. 7426 and § 70.207 of this part relating to civil actions by persons other than taxpayers, shall be begun after the expiration of 9 months from the date of levy or agreement under 26 U.S.C. 6325(b)(3) giving rise to such action.
( b ) *Period when claim is filed.* The 9-month period described in 26 U.S.C. 6532(c)(1) and paragraph (a) of this section shall be extended to the shorter of ( 1 ) 12 months from the date of filing by a third party of a written request under § 70.167(b)(2) of this part for the return of property wrongfully levied upon, or
( 2 ) 6 months from the date of mailing by registered or certified mail by the appropriate TTB officer to the party claimant of a notice of disallowance of the part of the request to which the action relates. A request which, under § 70.167(b)(3) of this part, is not considered adequate does not extend the 9-month period described in paragraph (a) of this section.
(26 U.S.C. 6532)
[T.D. ATF-301, 55 FR 47648, Nov. 14, 1990, as amended by T.D. ATF-450, 66 FR 29028, May 29, 2001] Limitations on Credit or Refund
EXHIBIT 11
                         J. BAKER, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
              Computation of Net Earnings (Loss) Per Common Share*

<TABLE>
<S>                                                        <C>                     <C>                        <C>
                                                                                   Year Ended
                                                           ---------------------------------------------------------------
                                                            January 31,             February 1,               February 3,
                                                              1998                    1997                       1996
                                                             --------               --------                    ------

Net Earnings (Loss) Per Common Share:

Net earnings (loss), basic and diluted                     $ 3,813,107             $(111,427,903)             $(38,602,114)
                                                            ==========              ============               ============

Weighted average common
     shares outstanding, basic                              13,911,080                13,887,544                13,858,273

Effect of dilutive securities:
     Stock options                                              59,219                         -                         -
                                                          ------------              ------------              ------------
Weighted average common
     shares outstanding, diluted                            13,970,299                13,887,544                13,858,273
                                                            ==========                ==========                ==========


Net earnings (loss) per common share, basic                      $0.27                    $(8.02)                   $(2.79)
                                                            ==========               ===========               ===========
Net earnings (loss) per common share, diluted                    $0.27                    $(8.02)                   $(2.79)
                                                            ==========               ===========               ===========



</TABLE>





* This calculation is submitted in accordance with Item 601(b)(11) of Regulation
S-K.
(No. 6384

#### Number Two Chicago Dwellings Association, An Illinois Not-For-Profit Corporation, Claimant, *vs.,*State of Illinois, Respondent.

*Opinion filed October 23, 1972.*

Number Two Chicago Dwellings Association, Claimant, pro se.

William J. Scott, Attorney General; Martin A. Soll, Assistant Attorney General, for Respondent.

Holderman, J.

Claimant seeks the sum of $3,500.00 for uncollected rent as a result of the Cook County Department of Public Aid’s alleged negligence in not implementing a rent withholding order issued by the Department on November 12, 1968, to July 1, 1969, for the recipients of Public Aid who resided at 515-17 West 65th Place, Chicago, Illinois.

The Complaint was filed on November 15, 1971.

Respondent made a Motion For Summary Judgment and as grounds for such Motion calls attention to the fact that this action was filed 137 days after the two year statute of limitations had run.

*106Respondent supported its Motion by citing the case of *Landsman and Zaransky*vs. *State of Illinois,*C.C.R. No. 6025, which was decided April 18, 1972.

In the above cited case, the Court of Claims dismissed the claim for unpaid rent for the reason that the action was filed 22 months after the rent withholding period. This case thus holds that the statute of limitations for rent withholding cases is measured from the last date of the withholding period.

Here the claimant has failed to file this claim within two years following the end of the rent withholding period.

Respondent further argued that claimant is guilty of contributory negligence for failure to take action when it was acquainted with the fact that the rent was not being withheld and called attention to the fact that a letter was written on August 2, 1972, which advised the claimant that the rent was not being withheld.

It is the finding of this Court that the claim not being filed within the period provided for by statute, the respondent’s Motion For Summary Judgment is in order.

Motion For Summary Judgment is hereby granted.
EXHIBIT 32.1
                                                                    ------------

             CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SS.1350, AS ADOPTED
              PURSUANT TO SS.906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


     In connection with the quarterly report of Spire Corporation (the
"Company") on Form 10-QSB (the "Report") for the period ended March 31, 2006 as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, I, Roger
G. Little, Chairman of the Board, Chief Executive Officer and President of the
Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss.1350, as adopted pursuant to ss.906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     2. The information contained in the report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.


Dated: May 15, 2006                          By: /s/ Roger G. Little
                                                 --------------------------
                                                 Roger G. Little
                                                 Chairman of the Board, Chief
                                                 Executive Officer and President


     A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or
other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the
signatures that appear in typed form within the electronic version of this
written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to the Company and
will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange
Commission or its staff upon request.
###### Editorial Note on Part 44

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 44 appear by T.D. ATF-464, 66 FR 43480, Aug. 20, 2001, and T.D. ATF-480, 67 FR 30801-30803, May 8, 2002.

#### § 44.246 Superseding bond.

The customs warehouse proprietor shall file a new bond to supersede his current bond, immediately when (a) the corporate surety on the current bond becomes insolvent, (b) the appropriate TTB officer approves a request from the surety on the current bond to terminate his liability under the bond, (c) payment of any liability under a bond is made by the surety thereon, or (d) the appropriate TTB officer considers such a superseding bond necessary for the protection of the revenue.
### §§9211, 9212. Repealed. Pub. L. 113–128, title V, §511(a), July 22, 2014, 128 Stat. 1705

Section 9211, Pub. L. 105–220, title II, §211, Aug. 7, 1998, 112 Stat. 1062; Pub. L. 105–277, div. A, §101(f) [title VIII, §404(b)], Oct. 21, 1998, 112 Stat. 2681–337, 2681–416, related to reservation of appropriated funds and grants and allotment of funds to eligible agencies.

Section 9212, Pub. L. 105–220, title II, §212, Aug. 7, 1998, 112 Stat. 1064; Pub. L. 105–277, div. A, §101(f) [title VIII, §404(c)], Oct. 21, 1998, 112 Stat. 2681–337, 2681–416, related to performance accountability system.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date of Repeal

Repeal effective on the first day of the first full program year after July 22, 2014 (July 1, 2015), see section 506 of Pub. L. 113–128, set out as an Effective Date note under section 3101 of Title 29, Labor.
**From File WorkSheet.wst** 

**Full Precision OFF**  **Confidence Coefficient 0.95** 

**Number of Valid Observations 3**  **Number of Distinct Observations 3**  **Minimum 1.23**  **Maximum 2.48** 

**Number of Valid Observations 12**  **Number of Distinct Observations 12**  **Minimum 0.6**  **Maximum 2.94**  **Mean of Raw Data 1.298**  **Standard Deviation of Raw Data 0.884**  **Kstar 2.216**  **Mean of Log Transformed Data 0.077**  **Standard Deviation of Log Transformed Data 0.608** 

**Correlation Coefficient R 0.887**  **Shapiro Wilk Test Statistic 0.771**  **Shapiro Wilk Critical (0.95) Value 0.859**  **Approximate Shapiro Wilk P Value 0.00453** 

**Lilliefors Test Statistic 0.257**  **Lilliefors Critical (0.95) Value 0.256** 

**Correlation Coefficient R 0.948**  **A-D Test Statistic 0.903**  **A-D Critical (0.95) Value 0.739**  **K-S Test Statistic 0.232** **K-S Critical(0.95) Value 0.248** 

**Correlation Coefficient R 0.931**  **Shapiro Wilk Test Statistic 0.844**  **Shapiro Wilk Critical (0.95) Value 0.859**  **Approximate Shapiro Wilk P Value 0.0441** 

**Lilliefors Test Statistic 0.201**  **Lilliefors Critical (0.95) Value 0.256**
### subpart 3—national activities
(No. 6944

#### Robert A. Williamson Co., Claimant, *vs.*State of Illinois, Department of Conservation, Respondent.

*Opinion filed November 28, 1972.*

Robert A. Williamson Co., Claimant, pro se.

William J. Scott, Attorney General; William E. Webber, Assistant Attorney General, for Respondent.

Per Curiam.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1995
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1995
<CASH>                                           5,543
<SECURITIES>                                     2,582
<RECEIVABLES>                                    2,003
<ALLOWANCES>                                        58
<INVENTORY>                                      4,448
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                          20,468
<DEPRECIATION>                                   7,873
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  53,756
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0
<BONDS>                                          9,858
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0<F2>
<COMMON>                                           408
<OTHER-SE>                                      10,551
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    53,756
<SALES>                                         49,601
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                53,195
<CGS>                                           41,304<F1>
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 4,064
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                    14
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 995
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  3,449
<INCOME-TAX>                                     1,328
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              2,121
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                           96
<NET-INCOME>                                     2,025
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     5.30
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     5.11
<FN>
<F1>Excludes depreciation of property and equipment, amortization of special tools,
pension expense and nonpension postretirement benefit expense.
<F2>Less than $1 million
</FN>
        

</TABLE>