alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Contact Station Resource

Rocky Mountain ANational Wildlife Commerce City, C
Lobby Resources

• Bathrooms • Water cooler• Animal pelts 

and mounts 

– Badger– Red fox– Cottontail 

rabbit

– Coyote– Deer– Skunk– Bald Eagle
Activity Room

The Activity Room is a large, open room with few displays and activ

It is a great place to seat your group for orientation to the Refug

activities needing space and an area for bad weather plan
Activity Room Resource

• Storage Shelf• Folding Chair• Art Cart – scis

sticks, crayonsclipboards (no 

• Television wit

VHS/DVD pla

• Puppet stage w

puppets

• Lake Mary Hi

Guides
Activity Room Resource

• Prairie dog town 

diorama with underground tunnels

• Bald Eagle display• American Bison 

display

• Animal Clues display• Wetland Wildlife 

Memory Game
Wildlife Learning Lab

The Wildlife Learning Lab is a room with numerous 

learning stations for children. It is a great rotation

to introduce your group to what lives at the Re
Displays:

• What is a Plant?• Refuge habitats • Identify prairie 

grasses

• Tree parts• Flower parts• Plant functions• Wildflowers

Wildlife Learning Lab – Plant Stati
Displays:

• What is an • Arthropod• Metamorp• Benefits o• Honey be

cycle, imp

• Spiders – w

body partclassificatio

• Aquatic 

invertebra

Wildlife Learning Lab – Invertebrate S
Displays:

• What is a Mammal?• Horn vs. Antler – match up game• Skulls – herbivore, omnivore, carnivore• Deer teeth• Animal pelts – coyote, deer, badger• Camouflage• Refuge mammal list

Wildlife Learning Lab – Mammal St
Displays:

• What is 

Reptile?

• Snake ske

and skull

• Turtle sh

skull

• Refuge r

list and p

Wildlife Learning Lab – Reptile Sta
Displays:

• What is an 

Amphibian?

• Frog skeleton• Frog life cycle 

and puzzle

• Refuge 

amphibian list and photos

Wildlife Learning Lab – Amphibian S
Displays:

• What is a Bird?• Bird beaks• Bird feet• Migration• Feathers• Nests and eggs• Owl pellet display• Tips and tricks to 

identifying birds

• Refuge Raptor 

photos

Wildlife Learning Lab – Bird Stati
Displays:

• What i• Body p• Fish ske• Refuge 

photos

Wildlife Learning Lab – Fish Statio
Contact Station Patio

The Contact Station is a great location to the lakes and main trail sy

Refuge. Sign up today for a self-guided field trip at the Contact
Phone Number
**Exhibit 32.1**

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO**

**18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Consolidated Resources Health Care Fund II(the "Partnership") on  Form 10-Q for the period ending  March 31, 2006 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on thedate hereof (the "Report"), I, John F. McMullan, Principal Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the Partnership, certify,pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, subject to the qualification notedbelow:

(1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934; and 

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of the operations of the Partnership.

This certification is qualified by the fact that the Report was not filed within45 days after the end of the  Partnership’s  quarter as required by GeneralInstruction A to Form 10-Q.

| Date: January 29, 2007 | By: |           /s/ John F. McMullan                                      |
|------------------------|-----|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

John F. McMullan

Chief Financial Officer (chief executive officer and chief financial officer of the Partnership)

 

 

|  | 14 |
|--|----|
### §3997. Approval of applications

#### (a) Criteria

The State shall establish criteria for approval of applications under this section. Such criteria shall include—

(1) consideration of the local district's need for, and inability to locally provide for, the activities, equipment, library and instructional materials requested;

(2) the number and nature of elementary and secondary students who will benefit from the planned program; and

(3) the expressed level of financial and in-kind commitment from other parties to the program.

#### (b) Approval procedures

The State shall adopt approval procedures designed to ensure that grants are equitably distributed among—

(1) rural, urban, and suburban areas; and

(2) small, medium, and large local educational agencies.

(Pub. L. 98–377, title III, §327, as added Pub. L. 100–418, title VI, §6031(a)(2), Aug. 23, 1988, 102 Stat. 1482.)
Editorial Note on Part 555
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 555 appear by T.D. ATF-487, 68 FR 3748, Jan. 24, 2003.

§ 555.52 Limitations on license or permit. ( a ) The license covers the business of explosive materials specified in the license at the licensee's business premises (see § 555.41(b)).
( b ) The permit is valid with respect to the type of operations of explosive materials specified in the permit.
[T.D. ATF-87, 46 FR 40384, Aug. 7, 1981, as amended by T.D. ATF-387, 62 FR 8376, Feb. 25, 1997; ATF 5F, 70 FR 30633, May 27, 2005]
(No. 74-CC-311

#### Standard Oil Division, Claimant, *vs.*State of Illinois, Department of General Services, Respondent.

*Opinion filed March 8, 1974.*

Standard Oil Division, Claimant, pro se.

William J. Scott, Attorney General; Edward L. S. Arkema, Jr., Assistant Attorney General, for Respondent.

Per Curiam.
August 2023

 STORAGE1000 ACRE-FEET COMPUTED* RELEASE - C.F.S. EVAPORATION PRECIP

DAY ELEV IN LAKE CHANGE INFLOW

C.F.S. POWER SPILL OUTLET C. F. S. INCHES INCHES

2,032.8

1 1,054.83 2,028.5 -4.4 1,389 3,437 0 0 148 0.41 0.00

2 1,054.48 2,024.6 -3.9 1,302 3,143 0 0 126 0.35 0.00

3 1,054.10 2,020.3 -4.2 1,042 3,063 0 0 115 0.32 0.00

4 1,053.69 2,015.8 -4.6 1,288 3,475 0 0 111 0.31 0.00

5 1,053.42 2,012.8 -3.0 998 2,388 0 0 122 0.34 0.00

6 1,053.18 2,010.1 -2.7 1,231 2,439 0 0 136 0.38 0.00

7 1,052.80 2,005.9 -4.2 1,206 3,195 0 0 136 0.38 0.00

8 1,052.43 2,001.8 -4.1 1,164 3,090 0 0 140 0.39 0.00

9 1,052.04 1,997.5 -4.3 983 3,017 0 0 143 0.40 0.00

10 1,051.71 1,993.8 -3.6 932 2,655 0 0 114 0.32 0.00

11 1,051.36 1,990.0 -3.9 1,105 2,932 0 0 121 0.34 0.00

12 1,051.10 1,987.1 -2.9 945 2,273 0 0 118 0.33 0.00

13 1,050.80 1,983.8 -3.3 1,047 2,588 0 0 125 0.35 0.00

14 1,050.44 1,979.8 -4.0 1,199 3,110 0 0 85 0.24 0.02

15 1,050.13 1,976.4 -3.4 1,555 3,139 0 0 135 0.38 0.00

16 1,049.78 1,972.6 -3.8 1,627 3,418 0 0 146 0.41 0.00

17 1,049.45 1,969.0 -3.6 1,360 3,035 0 0 149 0.42 0.00

18 1,049.15 1,965.7 -3.3 1,154 2,670 0 0 142 0.40 0.00

19 1,048.94 1,963.4 -2.3 1,012 2,045 0 0 127 0.36 0.00

20 1,048.63 1,960.0 -3.4 917 2,547 0 0 78 0.22 0.10

21 1,048.30 1,956.4 -3.6 1,007 2,789 0 0 35 0.10 0.04

22 1,047.98 1,952.9 -3.5 923 2,658 0 0 28 0.08 0.09

23 1,047.75 1,950.4 -2.5 1,065 2,221 0 0 106 0.30 0.00

24 1,047.26 1,945.0 -5.3 989 3,538 0 0 141 0.40 0.00

25 1,046.94 1,941.6 -3.5 1,114 2,746 0 0 123 0.35 0.00

26 1,046.68 1,938.7 -2.8 1,019 2,326 0 0 116 0.33 0.00

27 1,046.41 1,935.8 -2.9 933 2,280 0 0 130 0.37 0.00

28 1,046.08 1,932.2 -3.6 1,077 2,785 0 0 98 0.28 0.00

29 1,045.80 1,929.2 -3.0 1,334 2,771 0 0 91 0.26 0.00

30 1,045.33 1,924.1 -5.1 970 3,397 0 0 136 0.39 0.00

31 1,044.95 1,920.0 -4.1 1,071 3,023 0 0 119 0.34 0.00

TOTALS -112.8 34,958 88,193 0 0 3,640 10.25 0.25

ACRE-FEET -112,800 69,339 174,931 0 0 7,220

Comments: * COMPUTED INFLOW IS THE SUM OF CHANGE IN STORAGE, RELEASES, PUMPING AND EVAPORATION

 SUMMARY

Release (ACRE-FEET)

Power 174,931 Outlet 0

Spill 0 Total Releases 174,931

Precipitation

This month = 0.25

October 01, 2022 To date = 47.16

Historical Archive and Report Database

New Melones Lake Daily Operations

Run Date: 9/20/2023
## All drones are aircraft-even the ones at the toy store. So when I fly a drone I am a pi lot. Before I fly I always go through my pre-flight check list. I regularly check the safety guidelines at faa.gov/uas

Federal Aviation Administration ' I ,' FLY SMART, FLY SAFE , AND HAVE FUN! , 

### knowbeforeyoufly.org I 

### taa

. gov/uas 

### 0 I fly below 400 feet 

### 0 I always fly within visual line of sight 

### 0 I'm aware of FAA airspace requirements: faa.govlgoluastfr 

### 0 I never fly over groups of people 

### 0 I never fly over stadiums and sports events 

### 0 I never fly within 5 miles of an airport without first contacting air traffic control and airport authorities 

### 0 I never fly near emergency response efforts such as fires 

### 0 I never f ly near other aircraft 

### 0 I never fly under the influence

## All drones are aircraft- even the ones at the toy s tore. So when I fly a drone I am a pi lot. Befo re I fly I always go through my pre-flight check list. I r egu larly check the safety guidelines a t faa.gov /uas 

## FLY SMART, FLY SAFE, AND HAVE FUN! knowbeforeyoufly

.org faa.gov/uas 0 I fly below 4 00 feet 

### 0 I always fly within visual line of sight 0 I'm aware of FAA airspace requirements: faa.govlgoluastfr 

### 0 I never fly over g r oup s of people 0 I nev er f ly o v

er stad i u ms and spo rt s e v

ents 0 I nev er f ly within 5 miles of an airpo rt wit hou t f irst contacting ai r traffic con t ro l and ai rport authoriti es 0 I never fly near emergency response efforts such as fires 

### 0 I never fly near othe r ai rcraft 

### 0 I nev er f ly u nde r t h e influence

Federal Aviation Administration
#### § 771.36 Settlement.

Any proposals of settlement should be made to the Director of Industry Operations, but may be made through the Attorney for the Government. Where necessary, the date of the hearing may be postponed pending consideration of such proposals when they are made in good faith and not for the purpose of delay. If proposals of settlement are submitted, and they are considered unsatisfactory, the Director of Industry Operations may reject the proposals and may, either directly or through the Attorney for the Government, inform the licensee or permittee of any conditions on which the alleged violations may be settled. If the proposals of settlement are considered satisfactory to the Director of Industry Operations, the licensee or permittee shall be notified thereof and the proceeding shall be dismissed.
#### Eugene D. Crooker, Respondent, v. Pennsylvania Railroad Company, Appellant.

Judgment and order reversed and new trial granted, with costs to appellant to abide event. Held, that as matter of law plaintiff failed to establish freedom from contributory negligence. All concurred.
<PAGE>   1
                                                                Exhibit 16.1


                    [TERRENCE J. DUNNE, MBA, MST LETTERHEAD]

January 21, 1998


Securities and Exchange Commission
450 Fifth Street N.W.
Washington D.C. 20549


Gentlemen:

I have read the statements made by PAN Environmental Corporation, which I
understand will be filed with the Commission pursuant to Part II, Item 8 of
Form 10-KSB as part of the company's Form 10-KSB for the fiscal years ended
December 31, 1994, 1995, 1996 and 1997, and in the subsequent reports under the
Securities and Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. I agree with the statement
concerning my firm in the Form 10-KSB.



Sincerely,

/s/ TERRENCE J. DUNNE
---------------------------------
    Terrence J. Dunne
    Certified Public Accountant
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Bridget M. McCormack

, Chief Justice

Brian K. Zahra

David F. Viviano

Richard H. Bernstein

Elizabeth T. Clement

Megan K. Cavanagh

Elizabeth M. Welch,

Justices

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

July 9, 2021

b0706 

# Order

Clerk July 9, 2021

162150

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff

- Appellee,

v SC: 162150

COA: 354113

Kalamazoo CC: 1990

- 000932

- FC

JOSHUA DWAYNE LAWSON,

Defendant

- Appellant.

_________________________________________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the August 25, 2020 order

of the Court of Appeals is considered and, it appearing to thi s Court that the case of Pe o p le

v Poole (Docket No. 161529) is pending on appeal before this Court and that the decision

in that case may resolve an issue raised in the present application for leave to appeal, we

ORDER that the application be held in ABEYA NCE pending the decision in that case.
###### Editorial Note on Part 70

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 70 appear by T.D. ATF-450, 66 FR 29022-29030, May 29, 2001.

#### § 70.34 Listing by appropriate TTB officers of taxable objects owned by nonresidents.

Whenever there are any articles in any internal revenue district subject to tax, which are not owned or possessed by, or under the care or control of, any person within such district, and of which no list has been transmitted to the appropriate TTB officer, as required by law or by regulations prescribed pursuant to law, an appropriate TTB officer shall enter the premises where such articles are situated, make such inspection of the articles as may be necessary, and make lists of the same according to the forms prescribed. Such lists, being subscribed by the appropriate TTB officer, are sufficient lists of such articles for all purposes.

[T.D. ATF-450, 66 FR 29023, May 29, 2001]
Editorial Note on Part 46
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 46 appear by T.D. ATF-457, 66 FR 32220, 32221, June 14, 2001.

§ 46.102 Employer identification number. ( a ) *Requirement.* The employer identification number (as defined in 26 CFR 301.7701-12) of the taxpayer who has been assigned such a number must be shown on each special tax return, including each amended return, filed under this subpart. Failure of the taxpayer to include the employer identification number may result in the imposition of the penalty specified in § 70.113 of this chapter.
( b ) *Application for employer identification number.* Each taxpayer who files a special tax return and who has not already been assigned an employer identification number must file Internal Revenue Service (IRS) Form SS-4 to apply for one. The taxpayer must apply for and be assigned only one employer identification number, regardless of the number of places of business for which the taxpayer is required to file a special tax return. The taxpayer must apply for the employer identification number no later than 7 days after the filing of the taxpayer's first special (occupational) tax return. IRS Form SS-4 may be obtained from the director of an IRS service center, from any IRS district director, or from *http://www.irs.gov/ .*
(26 U.S.C. 6109)
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

DAY HIGH

 1,099

 1,098

 1,125

 1,139

 1,104

 1,069

 1,088

 1,150

 1,117

 1,013

 948

 871

 917

 966

 914

 906

 866

 833

 805

 802

 807

 777

 794

 768

 757

 779

 764

 775

 775

 757

 859

 879

 902

 928

 960

 905

 930

 910

 835

 837

 757

 695

 672

 743

 739

 740

 728

 716

 703

 682

 682

 663

 652

 636

 625

 615

 638

 642

 631

 630

 947

 965

 997

 1,019

 1,014

 996

 972

 981

 966

 910

 846

 803

 787

 791

 788

 787

 772

 764

 741

 725

 721

 697

 690

 679

 676

 681

 696

 687

 678

 677

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

SEPTEMBER 2020 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: October 19, 2020

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

HOLLAND TRACT ON OLD RIVER
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

DAY ELEV

 1,901.66

 1,900.85

 1,901.59

 1,901.65

 1,901.55

 1,901.85

 1,901.26

 1,901.40

 1,901.47

 1,901.12

 1,901.61

 1,901.04

 1,900.88

 1,900.85

 1,900.96

 1,900.89

 1,901.48

 1,901.40

 1,900.93

 1,901.85

 1,901.34

 1,901.21

 1,900.78

 1,901.27

 1,900.91

 1,901.39

 1,901.46

 1,901.66

 1,901.65

 1,900.66

 14,405

 13,801

 14,352

 14,397

 14,322

 14,547

 14,105

 14,210

 14,263

 14,001

 14,367

 13,941

 13,823

 13,801

 13,882

 13,830

 14,270

 14,210

 13,859

 14,547

 14,165

 14,068

 13,749

 14,113

 13,845

 14,203

 14,255

 14,405

 14,397

 13,661

STORAGE

+0

-604

+551

+45

-75

+225

-442

+105

+53

-262

+366

-426

-118

-22

+81

-52

+440

-60

-351

+688

-382

-97

-319

+364

-268

+358

+52

+150

-8

-736

CHANGE

349

28

686

403

787

1,122

541

386

352

249

952

541

527

570

348

638

1,190

674

425

821

370

398

317

948

631

587

792

911

370

458

INFLOW

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

POWER

 285

 276

 276

 278

 278

 278

 279

 278

 263

 255

 255

 254

 251

 251

 250

 252

 260

 281

 278

 281

 283

 282

 280

 280

 282

 281

 280

 282

 283

 282

SPILL

 46

 45

 45

 45

 45

 45

 45

 45

 45

 45

 45

 45

 45

 45

 45

 45

 45

 45

 45

 45

 45

 45

 45

 45

 45

 45

 45

 45

 45

 45

OUTLETS

 1

 2

 1

 2

 1

 1

 1

 0

 0

 0

 1

 0

 1

 0

 2

 0

 1

 0

 1

 1

 1

 2

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

C.F.S.

 .04

 .08

 .03

 .08

 .05

 .06

 .06

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .03

 .01

 .03

 .02

 .09

 .00

 .06

 .02

 .06

 .04

 .05

 .07

 .02

 .01

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

INCHES

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

NOVEMBER 2015 LEWISTON LAKE DAILY OPERATIONS RUN DATE: March 18, 2016

IN LAKE

EVAPORATION

C.F.S. FRANCIS CARR

COMPUTED*

ACRE-FEET

RELEASE - C.F.S. 

TOTALS -744 17,371 0 1,351 8,174 19 .91

ACRE-FEET -744 34,455 0 2,680 16,213 38

* COMPUTED INFLOW IS THE SUM OF CHANGE IN STORAGE, RELEASES AND EVAPORATION.

(1) OUTLET RELEASE INCLUDES FISH RELEASE.

(2) INCHES OF EVAPORATION TAKEN FROM PAN AT TRINITY RIVER HATCHERY.

SUMMARY

RELEASE (ACRE-FEET)

TOTAL POWER 0

TOTAL RIVER 18,893 35,160

 14,405

 16,267

RIVER

JUDGE FRANCIS CARR POWERPLANT

TOTAL RELEASE

JUDGE (2)

(1) POWERPLANT

 17

 10

 86

 55

 501

 685

 439

 10

 17

 81

 466

 457

 289

 285

 10

 367

 662

 378

 278

 147

 234

 118

 153

 439

 439

 81

 441

 508

 46

 502

 8,201

 16,267

Table 6
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY HIGH

 272

 271

 264

 261

 265

 267

 271

 273

 272

 254

 260

 247

 257

 241

 249

 237

 228

 220

 214

 220

 221

 209

 211

 203

 229

 232

 237

 240

 229

 236

 225

 246

 246

 247

 247

 246

 245

 244

 243

 233

 230

 231

 230

 226

 221

 220

 217

 206

 201

 198

 191

 186

 183

 184

 182

 186

 196

 195

 197

 202

 213

 209

 258

 257

 254

 254

 254

 254

 255

 255

 249

 238

 242

 236

 239

 230

 230

 225

 215

 207

 204

 202

 198

 192

 194

 192

 207

 210

 208

 210

 213

 222

 215

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

MARCH 2017 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: April 3, 2017

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

FARRAR PARK AT DUTCH SLOUGH
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent *

except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

The Honorable Tena Campbell, Senior District Judge for the U.S. **

District Court for Utah, sitting by designation.

NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

 FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

JERRY LYNN DAVIS,

 Petitioner - Appellant,

 v.

NEVADA ATTORNEY GENERAL; E.K.

MCDANIEL, Warden,

 Respondents - Appellees.

No. 10-15450

D.C. No. 3:09-cv-00222-ECRRAM

MEMORANDUM*

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the District of Nevada

Edward C. Reed, Senior District Judge, Presiding

Argued and Submitted February 14, 2011

San Francisco, California

Before: O’SCANNLAIN and TROTT, Circuit Judges, and CAMPBELL, Senior

District Judge.** 

Jerry Davis appeals the district court’s denial of his petition for a writ of

habeas corpus. We review de novo the district court’s denial of habeas relief, and

FILED

MAR 04 2011

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
“[w]e may affirm the district court’s decision on any ground supported by the

record, even if it differs from the district court’s rationale.” Lambert v. Blodgett,

393 F.3d 943, 965 (9th Cir. 2004). Mr. Davis’s claim, that he received ineffective

assistance due to his trial counsel’s failure to object to the trial court’s imposition

of consecutive sentences, was fairly presented to the Nevada Supreme Court; the

claim is thus properly exhausted. Castillo v. McFadden, 399 F.3d 993, 998-99 (9th

Cir. 2005).

Having expanded the Certificate of Appealability and received supplemental

briefing regarding the merits of Mr. Davis’s claim from the parties, the court finds

it to be without merit. The last reasoned opinion of the state court determined that

the performance of Mr. Davis’s counsel was not deficient because Nevada law

does not bind a trial court to a plea agreement, and Mr. Davis acknowledged his

understanding that the sentence imposed would be at the sole discretion of the trial

court. This decision was not contrary to, nor did it involve an unreasonable

application of, clearly established federal law: in this case, the standard for

effective assistance of counsel set forth by Strickland v. Washington, 466 U.S. 668,

687-88 (1984).

AFFIRMED.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

MIDDLE DISTRICT

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

Respondent

v.

TABU NAZSHON PHILLIPS,

Petitioner :

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

: No. 425 MAL 2016

Petition for Allowance of Appeal from the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW , this 22nd day of November, 2016

, the Petition for Allowance of

Appeal is DENIED

.

Justice Mundy did not participate in the consideration or decision of this matter.
STEAM ELECTRIC

CBI REPLACEMENT PAGE

EPA-HQ-OW-2009-0819

DCN: ________________________________________

THE FOLLOWING HAS BEEN REMOVED BECAUSE IT 

CONTAINS CONFIDENTIAL BUSINESS INFORMATION 

(CBI) PER 40 CFR PART 2, SUBPART B.

SE04360A148