alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY ELEV

 1,901.16

 1,901.48

 1,901.70

 1,901.32

 1,901.25

 1,901.21

 1,901.20

 1,901.41

 1,901.81

 1,901.67

 1,901.80

 1,901.42

 1,901.06

 1,901.81

 1,900.45

 1,901.50

 1,901.16

 1,901.20

 1,901.86

 1,901.89

 1,901.21

 1,900.95

 1,901.88

 1,901.00

 1,901.49

 1,901.48

 1,901.17

 1,901.30

 1,901.50

 1,901.16

 1,901.02

 14,031

 14,270

 14,435

 14,150

 14,098

 14,068

 14,061

 14,218

 14,517

 14,412

 14,509

 14,225

 13,956

 14,517

 13,506

 14,285

 14,031

 14,061

 14,554

 14,577

 14,068

 13,874

 14,569

 13,911

 14,278

 14,270

 14,038

 14,135

 14,285

 14,031

 13,926

STORAGE

-119

+239

+165

-285

-52

-30

-7

+157

+299

-105

+97

-284

-269

+561

-1,011

+779

-254

+30

+493

+23

-509

-194

+695

-658

+367

-8

-232

+97

+150

-254

-105

CHANGE

3,691

4,252

5,602

5,872

5,993

5,839

5,316

5,252

5,012

4,544

4,401

4,452

4,403

4,502

4,375

4,421

4,470

4,381

4,359

2,835

2,605

2,677

2,912

2,644

2,285

2,588

2,966

2,704

2,587

2,627

2,342

INFLOW

 80

 80

 80

 80

 80

 80

 80

 80

 32

 80

 80

 80

 80

 80

 80

 80

 80

 80

 80

 80

 80

 80

 80

 80

 80

 80

 80

 80

 80

 80

 80

POWER

 3,437

 3,814

 5,200

 5,700

 5,700

 5,535

 5,000

 4,853

 4,590

 4,252

 3,981

 3,726

 3,484

 3,259

 3,044

 2,843

 2,658

 2,478

 2,307

 2,150

 2,006

 1,884

 1,784

 1,688

 1,637

 1,513

 1,433

 1,358

 1,283

 1,208

 1,142

SPILL

 220

 220

 220

 220

 220

 220

 220

 220

 220

 220

 220

 220

 220

 220

 220

 220

 220

 220

 220

 220

 220

 220

 220

 220

 220

 220

 220

 220

 220

 220

 220

OUTLETS

 0

 4

 5

 2

 5

 5

 6

 6

 5

 5

 4

 5

 5

 6

 5

 6

 5

 5

 6

 1

 0

 3

 4

 5

 5

 5

 5

 2

 4

 6

 6

C.F.S.

 .01

 .17

 .21

 .21

 .24

 .24

 .26

 .27

 .21

 .24

 .26

 .23

 .25

 .27

 .22

 .26

 .25

 .25

 .27

 .03

 .01

 .14

 .18

 .22

 .24

 .24

 .22

 .08

 .20

 .28

 .28

INCHES

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

MAY 2002 LEWISTON LAKE DAILY OPERATIONS RUN DATE: June 18, 2002

IN LAKE

EVAPORATION

C.F.S. FRANCIS CARR

COMPUTED*

ACRE-FEET

RELEASE - C.F.S. 

TOTALS -224 122,909 2,432 6,820 94,947 136 6.44

ACRE-FEET -224 243,790 4,824 13,527 188,327 270

* COMPUTED INFLOW IS THE SUM OF CHANGE IN STORAGE, RELEASES AND EVAPORATION.

(1) OUTLET RELEASE INCLUDES THE CONTINUOUS FISH RELEASE OF 75 C.F.S.

(2) INCHES OF EVAPORATION TAKEN FROM PAN AT TRINITY RIVER HATCHERY

SUMMARY

RELEASE (ACRE-FEET)

TOTAL POWER 4,824

TOTAL RIVER 206,678 243,746

 14,150

 37,068

RIVER

JUDGE FRANCIS CARR POWERPLANT

TOTAL RELEASE

JUDGE (2)

(1) POWERPLANT

 14

 14

 14

 14

 14

 14

 14

 14

 14

 40

 67

 564

 750

 654

 1,536

 879

 1,635

 1,583

 1,497

 372

 556

 588

 474

 983

 158

 774

 1,345

 995

 924

 1,241

 947

 18,688

 37,068

Table 6
Editorial Note on Part 555
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 555 appear by T.D. ATF-487, 68 FR 3748, Jan. 24, 2003.

§ 555.221 Requirements for display fireworks, pyrotechnic compositions, and explosive materials used in assembling fireworks or articles pyrotechnic. ( a ) Display fireworks, pyrotechnic compositions, and explosive materials used to assemble fireworks and articles pyrotechnic shall be stored at all times as required by this Subpart unless they are in the process of manufacture, assembly, packaging, or are being transported.
( b ) No more than 500 pounds (227 kg) of pyrotechnic compositions or explosive materials are permitted at one time in any fireworks mixing building, any building or area in which the pyrotechnic compositions or explosive materials are pressed or otherwise prepared for finishing or assembly, or any finishing or assembly building. All pyrotechnic compositions or explosive materials not in immediate use will be stored in covered, non-ferrous containers.
( c ) The maximum quantity of flash powder permitted in any fireworks process building is 10 pounds (4.5 kg).
( d ) All dry explosive powders and mixtures, partially assembled display fireworks, and finished display fireworks shall be removed from fireworks process buildings at the conclusion of a day's operations and placed in approved magazines.
[T.D. ATF-293, 55 FR 3722, Feb. 5, 1990, as amended by T.D. ATF-400, 63 FR 45004, Aug. 24, 1998]
#### William Small, Appellant, *v.*870-7th Avenue Corporation, Respondent.

First Department,

February 2, 1948.

*Alfred L. Weiss*for appellant.

*Albert P. Thill*of counsel *(John P. Smith,*attorney), for respondent.

*Per Curiam.*

Plaintiff appeals from judgment in defendant’s favor entered on the court’s dismissal of the complaint at close of plaintiff’s case.

*217On plaintiff’s proof, he was injured, December 15,1944, when a large plate glass in one of the doors to the entrance of defendant’s premises shattered and broke after the door had *“*stuck ” and was hard to open as plaintiff was entering the hotel. Plaintiff also testified to claimed defective conditions in both the glass and the door when he entered through the same door two weeks before the acccident. In the light of all the facts adduced in plaintiff’s proof including the testimony concerning the alleged defective condition of the same door and the glass therein two weeks prior to the accident, we think the evidence was sufficient to establish a prima facie case and the court should not have granted the defendant’s motion to dismiss at close of plaintiff’s case.

The judgment in defendant’s favor dismissing the complaint should be reversed and a new trial ordered, with costs to appellant to abide the event.

Peck, P. J., Glennon, Dore, Van Voorhis and Shientag, JJ., concur.

Judgment unanimously reversed and a new trial ordered, with costs to the appellant to abide the event.
§ 5.29 Personalized labels. ( a ) *General.* Applicants for label approval may obtain permission from TTB to make certain changes in order to personalize labels without having to resubmit labels for TTB approval. A personalized label is an alcohol beverage label that meets the minimum mandatory label requirements and is customized for customers. Personalized labels may contain a personal message, picture, or other artwork that is specific to the consumer who is purchasing the product. For example, a distiller may offer individual or corporate customers labels that commemorate an event such as a wedding or grand opening.
( b ) *Application.* Any person who intends to offer personalized labels must submit a template for the personalized label as part of the application for label approval required under §§ 5.21 or 5.24, and must note on the application a description of the specific personalized information that may change.
( c ) *Approval of personalized label.* If the application complies with the regulations, TTB will issue a certificate of label approval (COLA) with a qualification allowing the personalization of labels. The qualification will allow the certificate holder to add or change items on the personalized label such as salutations, names, graphics, artwork, congratulatory dates and names, or event dates without applying for a new COLA. All of these items on personalized labels must comply with the regulations of this part.
( d ) *Changes not allowed to personalized labels.* Approval of an application to personalize labels does not authorize the addition of any information that discusses either the alcohol beverage or characteristics of the alcohol beverage or that is inconsistent with or in violation of the provisions of this part or any other applicable provision of law or regulations.
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Raffaelino Manzallilo, Appellant.

Motion granted. Present — Burr, Thomas, Rich, Stapleton and Putnam, JJ.
### §§6141 to 6148. Omitted

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Sections 6141 to 6148 were omitted pursuant to section 6251 of this title which provided that the authority under this chapter terminated on Oct. 1, 2001.

Section 6141, Pub. L. 103–239, title II, §211, May 4, 1994, 108 Stat. 582, stated purpose of this part.

Section 6142, Pub. L. 103–239, title II, §212, May 4, 1994, 108 Stat. 582, authorized grants to States and territories.

Section 6143, Pub. L. 103–239, title II, §213, May 4, 1994, 108 Stat. 583; Pub. L. 104–193, title I, §110(v), Aug. 22, 1996, 110 Stat. 2175, related to application for grant.

Section 6144, Pub. L. 103–239, title II, §214, May 4, 1994, 108 Stat. 586, related to review of application.

Section 6145, Pub. L. 103–239, title II, §215, May 4, 1994, 108 Stat. 587, related to use of amounts from grant.

Section 6146, Pub. L. 103–239, title II, §216, May 4, 1994, 108 Stat. 591, related to allocation requirement.

Section 6147, Pub. L. 103–239, title II, §217, May 4, 1994, 108 Stat. 591, related to limitation on administrative costs.

Section 6148, Pub. L. 103–239, title II, §218, May 4, 1994, 108 Stat. 591, required reports by State.
Editorial Note on Part 45
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 45 appear by T.D. ATF-460, 66 FR 39093, July 27, 2001.

§ 45.51 Supporting records. ( a ) *Records of removals.* Every manufacturer who removes tobacco products, and cigarette papers and tubes under this part must, in addition to the records kept under part 40 of this chapter, keep a supporting record of such removals and must make appropriate entries therein at the time of removal. The supporting record for each removal must show: ( 1 ) The date of removal;
( 2 ) The name and address of the Federal agency to which shipped or delivered;
( 3 ) The kind and quantity and,
( 4 ) for large cigars, the sale price.
( b ) *Records of returns.* If any tobacco products, or cigarette papers or tubes removed under this part are returned to the factory, such returns must be noted in the supporting record.
( c ) *Commercial records.* Where the manufacturer keeps, at the factory, copies of invoices or other commercial records containing the information required as to each removal, in such manner that the information may be readily ascertained therefrom, such copies will be considered the supporting record required by this section.
( d ) *Retention period.* The manufacturer must retain the supporting record for 3 years following the close of the year covered therein. The record must be made available for inspection by any appropriate TTB officer upon request.
(Approved by the Office of Management and Budget under control number 1512-0363) (See 26 U.S.C. 5741)
[T.D. ATF-420, 64 FR 71945, Dec. 22, 1999, as amended by T.D. ATF-472, Feb. 27, 2002]
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

DAY ELEV

 123.38

 123.42

 123.91

 123.45

 123.78

 123.77

 123.76

 123.90

 123.90

 123.69

 122.78

 123.21

 123.10

 122.98

 123.80

 123.91

 123.31

 123.69

 123.38

 123.54

 123.70

 123.76

 124.38

 124.07

 124.21

 124.32

 124.48

 123.47

 123.68

 123.10

 7,970

 7,988

 8,219

 8,003

 8,158

 8,153

 8,148

 8,214

 8,214

 8,115

 7,692

 7,890

 7,838

 7,782

 8,167

 8,219

 7,937

 8,115

 7,970

 8,045

 8,120

 8,148

 8,451

 8,296

 8,366

 8,421

 8,501

 8,012

 8,111

 7,838

STORAGE

+127

+18

+231

-216

+155

-5

-5

+66

+0

-99

-423

+198

-52

-56

+385

+52

-282

+178

-145

+75

+75

+28

+303

-155

+70

+55

+80

-489

+99

-273

CHANGE

2,773

2,728

2,818

2,596

2,778

2,695

2,700

2,739

2,707

2,654

2,496

2,817

2,690

2,686

2,904

2,735

2,577

2,817

2,693

2,765

2,661

2,633

2,777

2,547

2,658

2,646

2,666

2,371

2,652

2,470

INFLOW

 2,245

 2,642

 2,639

 2,640

 2,635

 2,633

 2,637

 2,640

 2,641

 2,638

 2,637

 2,637

 2,635

 2,634

 2,630

 2,629

 2,639

 2,496

 2,073

 1,600

 1,285

 1,498

 1,505

 1,505

 1,497

 1,498

 1,507

 1,509

 1,509

 1,509

POWER

 379

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 151

 613

 1,046

 1,258

 1,041

 1,039

 1,040

 1,045

 1,051

 1,055

 1,045

 1,028

 1,034

SPILL

 64

 64

 61

 64

 64

 64

 64

 64

 64

 64

 64

 64

 64

 64

 64

 64

 64

 64

 64

 64

 64

 64

 64

 64

 64

 64

 64

 64

 64

 64

HATCHERY

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 2

 2

 2

 2

 1

 1

 2

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 2

 1

 1

 1

 1

 2

 0

 0

 0

 1

 1

C.F.S.

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

NOVEMBER 2019 LAKE NATOMA DAILY OPERATIONS RUN DATE: December 1, 2019

IN LAKE

EVAP

C.F.S.

COMPUTED*

ACRE-FEET

RELEASE - C.F.S.

TOTALS -5 80,449 65,422 12,825 1,917 34

ACRE-FEET -5 159,571 129,765 25,438 3,802 67

COMMENTS:

* COMPUTED INFLOW IS THE SUM OF CHANGE IN STORAGE, RELEASES AND EVAPORATION.

SUMMARY

RELEASES (ACRE-FEET)

POWER 129,765

SPILL 25,438

FOLSOM SOUTH CANAL

HATCHERY

 506

 3,802

 7,843

FOLSOM

SOUTH 

 20

 12

 1

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 7

 15

 15

 15

 15

 15

 15

 15

 15

 15

 15

 15

 15

 15

 15

 5

 0

 0

 0

 0

 255

 506

(1)

(1) INCHES OF EVAPORATION TAKEN FROM FOLSOM PAN.

RELEASES (ACRE-FEET) 

TOTAL 159,511
EXHIBIT 32
 CCFNB BANCORP, INC.
 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
 
 1.
    
    The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and2.
    
    The information contained in this Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.
  /s/ Lance O. Diehl

Lance O. DiehlPresident and Chief Executive Officer(Principal Executive Officer)
  /s/ Jeffrey T. Arnold

Jeffrey T. Arnold CPA, CIAChief Financial Officer and Treasurer(Principal Financial Officer)
 40
###### Editorial Note on Part 45

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 45 appear by T.D. ATF-460, 66 FR 39093, July 27, 2001.

#### § 45.32 Under manufacturer's bond.

Removals of tobacco products, and cigarette papers and tubes under this part shall be made under the bond filed by the manufacturer of such articles to cover the operations of his factory as required by section 5711, I.R.C., and regulations issued thereunder.

(72 Stat. 1418, as amended, 1421, as amended; 26 U.S.C. 5704, 5711)

[T.D. 6871, 31 FR 57, as amended by T.D. ATF-243, 51 FR 28090, Aug. 5, 1986; 51 FR 43194, Dec. 1, 1986]
EXHIBIT 21

X-RITE, INCORPORATED

LIST OF CONSOLIDATED SUBSIDIARIES



|    |  |                                                  
|--- |  | -------------------------------------------------
|1.  |  | X-Rite International, Inc.                       
|    | 
|2.  |  | X-Rite Holdings, Incorporated                    
|    | 
|3.  |  | X-Rite GmbH                                      
|    | 
|4.  |  | X-Rite Asia Pacific Limited                      
|    | 
|5.  |  | X-Rite Ltd.                                      
|    | 
|6.  |  | X-Rite MA, Incorporated                          
|    | 
|7.  |  | OTP, Incorporated                                
|    | 
|8.  |  | Labsphere, Inc.                                  
|    | 
|9.  |  | X-Rite Méditerranée SARL                         
|    | 
|10. |  | X-Rite Global, Incorporated.                     
|    | 
|11. |  | XR Ventures, LLC                                 
|    | 
|12. |  | X-Rite Europe, B.V.                              
|    | 
|13. |  | X-Rite, (Shanghai) International Trading Co. Ltd.
|    | 
|14. |  | Monaco Acquisition Company                       
|    | 
|15. |  | X-Rite, KK                                       
|    | 
|16. |  | X-Rite, Italy Srl.                               
|    | 
|17. |  | X-Rite Asia Pacific PTE                          
|    | 
|18. |  | Labsphere Ltd.
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Jose Eleazar GARCIA-FALCON, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 05-11210

Conference Calendar.

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.

July 13, 2006.

Denise B. Williams, U.S. Attorney’s Office, Northern District of Texas, Lubbock, TX, for Plaintiff-Appellee.

David E. Sloan, Federal Public Defender’s Office, Northern District of Texas, Lubbock, TX, for Defendant-Appellant.

Before DAVIS, BARKSDALE, and DeMOSS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: *

Appealing the Judgment in a Criminal Case, Jose Eleazar Garcia-Falcon raises arguments that are foreclosed by *Almendarez-Torres v. United States,*523 U.S. 224, 235, 118 S.Ct. 1219, 140 L.Ed.2d 350 (1998), which held that 8 U.S.C. § 1326(b)(2) is a penalty provision and not a separate criminal offense. The Government’s motion for summary affirmance is GRANTED, and the judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.

*

 Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.
### SUBCHAPTER I—SCHOOL-TO-WORK OPPORTUNITIES BASIC PROGRAM COMPONENTS
#### § 5.51 Requirement for firmly affixed labels.

Any label that is not an integral part of the container must be affixed to the container in such a way that it cannot be removed without thorough application of water or other solvents.
### §§15h to 15m. Repealed. Pub. L. 90–576, title I, §103, Oct. 16, 1968, 82 Stat. 1091

Section 15h, acts June 8, 1936, ch. 541, §1, 49 Stat. 1488; Aug. 1, 1946, ch. 725, §1, 60 Stat. 775, provided for a popular name. Subject matter of section prior to its amendment related to the development of vocational education in States and Territories, appropriations and their allotment, and matching of funds by States and Territories, and was replaced by sections 15j and 15k of this title.

Section 15i, acts June 8, 1936, ch. 541, §2, 49 Stat. 1488; Aug. 1, 1946, ch. 725, title I, §101, 60 Stat. 775; Aug. 2, 1956, ch. 871, title III, §301, 70 Stat. 925; June 25, 1959, Pub. L. 86–70, §18(b)(2), 73 Stat. 144; July 12, 1960, Pub. L. 86–624, §14(b)(3), 74 Stat. 414, defined "States and Territories", "State plan", "State board", and "Smith-Hughes Vocational Education Act".

Section 15j, acts June 8, 1936, ch. 541, §3, 49 Stat. 1489; Aug. 1, 1946, ch. 725, title I, §101, 60 Stat. 775; Aug. 2, 1956, ch. 871, title III, §301, 70 Stat. 925; Aug. 8, 1956, ch. 1039, §2, 70 Stat. 1126, authorized appropriations for programs in vocational education in agriculture, home economics, trades and industry, distributive occupations, and fishery trades.

Section 15k, acts June 8, 1936, ch. 541, §4, 49 Stat. 1489; Aug. 1, 1946, ch. 725, title I, §101, 60 Stat. 776; Aug. 2, 1956, ch. 871, title III, §301, 70 Stat. 925, required that Federal funds be matched by State and local funds in order to receive benefits of section 15i et seq. of this title.

Section 15l, acts June 8, 1936, ch. 541, §5, 49 Stat. 1489; 1940 Reorg. Plan No. III, §1(a)(1), eff. June 30, 1940, 5 F.R. 2107, 54 Stat. 1231; Aug. 1, 1946, ch. 725, title I, §101, 60 Stat. 776; Aug. 2, 1956, ch. 871, title III, §301, 70 Stat. 925, provided for method of payment of funds to which the State or Territory was entitled under section 15i et seq. of this title.

Section 15m, acts June 8, 1936, ch. 541, §6, 49 Stat. 1489; Aug. 1, 1946, ch. 725, title I, §101, 60 Stat. 777; Aug. 2, 1956, ch. 871, title, III, §301, 70 Stat. 925, made funds available for salary and expenses of State directors.

For general subject matter of sections 15i to 15m, see section 1241 et seq. of this title.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date of Repeal

Pub. L. 90–576, title I, §103, Oct. 16, 1968, 82 Stat. 1091, provided that the repeal is effective July 1, 1969.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

DAY ELEV

 123.91

 123.55

 123.39

 123.17

 123.76

 124.27

 124.04

 123.79

 123.40

 123.28

 123.42

 123.88

 124.67

 124.69

 124.56

 124.56

 124.11

 124.45

 124.66

 124.43

 124.76

 124.61

 124.68

 124.95

 124.70

 124.94

 123.66

 123.98

 123.79

 123.83

 8,219

 8,050

 7,974

 7,871

 8,148

 8,396

 8,281

 8,162

 7,979

 7,923

 7,988

 8,205

 8,596

 8,606

 8,541

 8,541

 8,316

 8,486

 8,591

 8,476

 8,641

 8,566

 8,601

 8,736

 8,611

 8,731

 8,101

 8,252

 8,162

 8,181

STORAGE

-457

-169

-76

-103

+277

+248

-115

-119

-183

-56

+65

+217

+391

+10

-65

+0

-225

+170

+105

-115

+165

-75

+35

+135

-125

+120

-630

+151

-90

+19

CHANGE

2,838

2,968

2,946

3,002

3,084

3,106

2,995

2,984

2,940

2,562

2,587

2,666

2,764

2,583

1,919

2,573

2,482

2,662

2,630

2,518

2,658

2,604

2,558

2,746

2,621

2,654

2,171

2,667

2,551

2,582

INFLOW

 2,959

 2,945

 2,876

 2,946

 2,835

 2,873

 2,944

 2,936

 2,924

 2,482

 2,447

 2,450

 2,460

 2,471

 1,845

 2,466

 2,487

 2,469

 2,469

 2,468

 2,467

 2,534

 2,432

 2,570

 2,576

 2,485

 2,383

 2,484

 2,488

 2,464

POWER

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

SPILL

 60

 60

 60

 60

 60

 60

 60

 60

 60

 60

 60

 60

 60

 60

 60

 60

 60

 60

 60

 60

 60

 60

 60

 60

 60

 60

 60

 60

 60

 60

HATCHERY

 4

 3

 3

 3

 4

 3

 4

 3

 3

 3

 2

 2

 2

 2

 2

 2

 3

 2

 3

 3

 3

 3

 3

 3

 3

 4

 1

 2

 3

 3

C.F.S.

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

SEPTEMBER 2005 LAKE NATOMA DAILY OPERATIONS RUN DATE: March 14, 2006

IN LAKE

EVAP

C.F.S.

COMPUTED*

ACRE-FEET

RELEASE - C.F.S.

TOTALS -495 80,621 77,635 0 1,800 84

ACRE-FEET -495 159,912 153,989 0 3,570 167

COMMENTS:

* COMPUTED INFLOW IS THE SUM OF CHANGE IN STORAGE, RELEASES AND EVAPORATION.

SUMMARY

RELEASES (ACRE-FEET)

POWER 153,989

SPILL 0

FOLSOM SOUTH CANAL

HATCHERY

 2,678

 3,570

 8,676

FOLSOM

SOUTH 

 45

 45

 45

 45

 45

 45

 45

 45

 45

 45

 45

 45

 45

 45

 45

 45

 45

 45

 45

 45

 45

 45

 45

 45

 45

 45

 45

 45

 45

 45

 1,350

 2,678

(1)

(1) INCHES OF EVAPORATION TAKEN FROM FOLSOM PAN.

RELEASES (ACRE-FEET) 

TOTAL 160,237

Table 12
#### In the Matter of Berke Brothers Distilleries, Inc., Petitioner, against John F. O’Connell et al., Constituting the State Liquor Authority, Respondents.

While the evidence was insufficient to warrant the finding by the State Liquor Authority as to the first count and possibly the second, it was sufficient to warrant the finding of violations under the third and fourth counts, and, therefore, we unanimously confirm the determination, with $50 costs and disbursements to the respondents. Present — Peck, P. J., Glennon, Cohn, Callahan and Van Voorhis, JJ. [See *post,*p. 878.]