alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 10.1


 





FBEC Worldwide Inc.


Letter of Intent







 


 





June 29, 2015


 


Tyler Strause, President


G. Randall & Sons, Inc.


2069 Coast Blvd


Del Mar CA 92014


 


Dear Tyler,


 


FBEC Worldwide Inc. desires to engage G.
Randall & Sons Inc. for the purchase of Intellectual Property related to the formulation and preparation of a 2 oz hemp energy
shot as described in attachment 1: 2 oz Extra Strength Hemp Energy Shot - Original Formula.


 


G. Randall & Sons, Inc. (herein “GR&S”)
agrees to provide the formula and recipe for a proprietary hemp energy shot (the “IP”) to FBEC Worldwide (herein “FBEC”)
under an Intellectual Purchase Agreement with considerations of $50,000 ( $15,000 cash payment and, $35,000 in Common
stock under a Convertible Note Agreement), A Royalty Agreement of 2.5% of net sales, and a Consulting
Agreement with considerations of $3,000 per month.


 


Product formulation and recipe will be
delivered upon receipt of the above executed documents and the cash payment of $15,000. Any changes to the IP formula, described
in Attachment 1 herein, which do not substantially impact the final formulation, will be provided at no cost.


 


GR&S agrees that any future beverage
product formulations and recipes will be acquired under an Intellectual Property Purchase Agreement for $20,000 ( $10,000 in cash
and $10,000 in Common stock under a Convertible Note Agreement), with a Royalty Agreement of 2.5% of net sales for each formulation
and recipe.


 





Prepared By:


 


 


 


Linda Strause, Ph. D. Vice President


G. Randall & Sons, Inc.


 


 


Received By:


 


 


Robert Sand, CEO


FBEC Worldwide Inc.







 


 






    	1



    	 



    

 








FBEC Worldwide Inc.


Letter of Intent







  


 


Attachment 1


2


oz - Extra Strength, Hemp Energy Drink - Original Formula


Hemp Juice Energy Shot –


 





Attachment 1


2oz - Extra Strength, Hemp Energy Drink - Original Formula


Hemp Juice Energy Shot –


		·	A two ounce shot made with hemp juice, aloe, sweetened with stevia and agave nectar.



		·	Fortified with vital nutrients and amino-acids enriched with a proprietary blend of herbal extracts to deliver a boost of energy
and all day focus.



Base Ingredients


		·	Hemp Juice



		·	Vegetable Glycerine



		·	Agave Nectar



		·	Aloe Juice



		·	Sweetener of Choice



Vital Nutrients & Amino Acids


		·	Beta-Carotene (Vitamin A)



		·	Caffeine



		·	Niacin (Vitamin B3)



		·	Thiamine (Vitamin B1)



		·	Pantothenic Acid (Vitamin B5)



		·	Sodium (Sodium Ascorbate)



		·	Biotin (Vitamin B7)



		·	Phosphatidylserine



Proprietary Herbal Blend


		·	Green Tea Extract (Camellia sinensis)



		·	Siberian Ginseng Extract (Eleutheroccoccus senticosus)



		·	American Ginseng Root Extract (Panax Ginseng)



		·	Chinese Licorice Root Extract (Glycyrrhiza Uranelsis Radix)



		·	Ginkgo Biloba Leaf Extract (Ginkgo biloba)



		·	Guayusa Leaf Extract (Ilex guayusa)



Other Ingredients : Soy Lecithin, Sodium Benzoate, Natural Flavor


G. Randall & Sons, Inc | 2069 Coast Blvd. Del Mar, CA 92014
| tyler@randallandsonsinc.com | (858) 876.7901




 


 






    	2
###### Editorial Note on Part 40

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 40 appear by T.D. ATF-460, 66 FR 39094-39096, July 27, 2001; T.D. ATF-464, 66 FR 43479, Aug. 20, 2001; and T.D. TTB-91, 76 FR 5479, Feb. 1, 2011.

#### § 40.135 Strengthening bond.

Where the amount of any bond is no longer sufficient under the provisions of § 40.133 or § 40.134, the manufacturer shall immediately file a strengthening bond in an appropriate amount with the same surety as that on the bond already in effect, unless a superseding bond is filed pursuant to § 40.136. Strengthening bonds will not be approved where any notation is made thereon which is intended, or which may be construed, as a release of any former bond, or as limiting the amount of either bond to less than its full amount.

(72 Stat. 1421; 26 U.S.C. 5711)
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY ELEV

 946.39

 945.64

 944.81

 944.09

 943.16

 942.35

 941.53

 940.76

 939.95

 939.28

 938.51

 937.82

 936.99

 936.24

 935.60

 935.11

 934.53

 934.05

 933.56

 933.15

 932.73

 932.31

 931.96

 931.51

 931.20

 930.73

 930.36

 929.97

 929.59

 929.12

 928.76

 1,028.8

 1,023.3

 1,017.3

 1,012.0

 1,005.3

 999.5

 993.6

 988.0

 982.3

 977.5

 972.0

 967.2

 961.3

 956.0

 951.6

 948.1

 944.1

 940.8

 937.4

 934.6

 931.7

 928.8

 926.4

 923.3

 921.1

 917.9

 915.4

 912.8

 910.2

 907.0

 904.6

STORAGE

-7.1

-5.5

-6.1

-5.2

-6.7

-5.8

-5.9

-5.5

-5.8

-4.8

-5.5

-4.9

-5.8

-5.3

-4.5

-3.4

-4.0

-3.3

-3.4

-2.8

-2.9

-2.9

-2.4

-3.1

-2.1

-3.2

-2.5

-2.7

-2.6

-3.2

-2.4

CHANGE

300

344

235

158

276

267

290

297

265

248

269

272

285

396

227

231

193

364

132

313

204

270

262

54

235

279

290

308

221

236

225

INFLOW

 3,797

 2,972

 3,224

 2,705

 3,576

 3,116

 3,186

 3,010

 3,099

 2,558

 2,930

 2,631

 3,151

 2,960

 2,397

 1,877

 2,155

 1,955

 1,778

 1,707

 1,613

 1,666

 1,409

 1,539

 1,235

 1,818

 1,476

 1,574

 1,422

 1,752

 1,355

POWER

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

SPILL

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

OUTLET

 100

 142

 66

 94

 98

 98

 77

 69

 83

 92

 92

 100

 82

 88

 86

 79

 72

 90

 63

 36

 51

 62

 67

 69

 71

 80

 86

 75

 99

 92

 98

C.F.S.

 .42

 .60

 .28

 .40

 .42

 .42

 .33

 .30

 .36

 .40

 .40

 .44

 .36

 .39

 .38

 .35

 .32

 .40

 .28

 .16

 .23

 .28

 .30

 .31

 .32

 .36

 .39

 .34

 .45

 .42

 .45

INCHES

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

PRECIP

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

AUGUST 2021 NEW MELONES LAKE DAILY OPERATIONS RUN DATE: September 16, 2021

IN LAKE

EVAPORATION

INCHES

C.F.S.

COMPUTED*

1000 ACRE-FEET

RELEASE - C.F.S.

TOTALS -131.3 7,946 71,643 0 0 2,557 11.26 .00

ACRE-FEET -131,300 15,761 142,104 0 0 5,072

COMMENTS:

* COMPUTED INFLOW IS THE SUM OF CHANGE IN STORAGE, RELEASES AND EVAPORATION.

SUMMARY

RELEASE (ACRE-FEET)

POWER 142,104

SPILL 0

OUTLET

TOTAL

 0

 142,104

PRECIPITATION

THIS MONTH =

TO DATE =

 .00

JULY 1, 2021 .02

 1,036.0

Table 13 

OCT 1, 2020 TO DATE = 16.80
#### Gust Marion JANIS, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Alberto R. GONZALES, Attorney General, in his capacity as Attorney General of the United States; et al., Defendants — Appellees.

No. 04-56315.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted Feb. 13, 2006.*

Decided Feb. 22, 2006.

*811Gust Marion Janis, Terre Haute, IN, pro se.

Robert I. Lester, Esq., Office of the U.S. Attorney, Los Angeles, CA, for Defendants-Appellees.

Before: FERNANDEZ, RYMER, and BYBEE, Circuit Judges.

*

 The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. *See*Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

MEMORANDUM **

Federal prisoner Gust Marion Janis appeals pro se from the district court’s judgment dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action alleging various constitutional, statutory, and common law claims related to the conditions of his confinement. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review the district court’s factual determination that Janis failed to exhaust his administrative remedies for clear error, and its legal conclusions de novo. *Wyatt v. Terhune,*315 F.3d 1108, 1120 (9th Cir.2003). We review de novo dismissal for lack of subject matter jurisdiction and for failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted. *Rivera v. United States,*924 F.2d 948, 950 (9th Cir. 1991). We affirm.

The district court did not err in determining that Janis failed to exhaust available administrative remedies prior to filing this action. *See*42 U.S.C. § 1997e(a); *McKinney v. Carey,*311 F.3d 1198, 1200 (9th Cir.2002) (per curiam) (“a prisoner does not comply with [the exhaustion] requirement by exhausting available remedies during the course of the litigation”). We are not persuaded by Janis’s contention that he was not required to exhaust available administrative remedies.

The district court properly dismissed with prejudice Janis’s constitutional tort claims for damages against the United States based on sovereign immuni*812ty. *See Balser v. Dep’t of Justice, Office of U.S. Trustee,*327 F.3d 903, 907 (9th Cir. 2003). The district court also properly dismissed with prejudice Janis’s claim under the Equal Access to Justice Act. *See Merrell v. Block,*809 F.2d 639, 642 (9th Cir.1987) (“Congress intended that an attorney have been retained for a prevailing pro se litigant to recover attorneys fees under the EAJA”).

AFFIRMED

**

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
EXHIBIT 3.24
 OPERATING AGREEMENT
OF
FARMINGTON HEART & VASCULAR CENTER, LLC
 31
  ARTICLE I
 OFFICES
   ARTICLE II
 MEMBERS




---



##### 



2




---



##### 



ARTICLE III
 MANAGERS
       3




---



##### 



4




---



##### 



ARTICLE IV
 OFFICERS
    5




---



##### 



6




---



##### 



ARTICLE V
 CONTRACTS, LOANS, CHECKS AND DEPOSITS
  7




---



##### 



ARTICLE VI
 TRANSFER OF PERCENTAGE OWNERSHIP
  ARTICLE VII
 FISCAL YEAR
  ARTICLE VIII
 DISTRIBUTIONS
  ARTICLE IX
 SEAL
  8




---



##### 



ARTICLE X
 WAIVER OF NOTICE
  ARTICLE XI
 INDEMNIFICATION OF OFFICERS AND MANAGERS
  ARTICLE XII
 AMENDMENTS
  9




---



##### 



31
 FARMINGTON MISSOURI HOSPITAL COMPANY, LLC, Sole
MemberBy:
    /s/ Howard T. Wall IIIName:
    Howard T. Wall IIITitle:
    Vice President & Secretary 10
#### Lord & Taylor, Respondent, v. Edward Hatch, Appellant.

Judgment and order affirmed, with costs. Ho opinion. Present — Ingraham, P. J., McLaughlin, Laughlin, Clarke and Scott, JJ.
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent

except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 00-20091

Summary Calendar

 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

CRAIG MICHAEL COSCARELLI, 

also known as John Coscarelli,

Defendant-Appellant.

--------------------

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Texas

USDC No. H-97-CV-1044

USDC No. H-94-CR-120-1

--------------------

August 10, 2000

Before REYNALDO G. GARZA, SMITH, and PARKER, Circuit Judges. 

PER CURIAM:*

 Craig Michael Coscarelli, federal prisoner # 23429-013,

moves for a certificate of appealability (COA) to appeal the

district courts denial of his motion to reopen the time for

filing an appeal from the denial of his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 motion. 

 This court must examine the basis of its jurisdiction on its

own motion if necessary. United States v. Lister, 53 F.3d 66, 68

(5th Cir. 1995). The record shows that the order dismissing his 

§ 2255 motion was entered on October 1, 1998, and the motion to

reopen the time for appeal was not filed until November 23, 1999. 
No. 00-20091

- 2 -

As Coscarelli did not timely file a notice of appeal and did not

seek permission to reopen the time to appeal within 180 days of

the entry of judgment, this court lacks jurisdiction over his

appeal. See Rule 11, Rules Governing § 2255 Motions; Fed. R.

App. P. 4(a)(1) & (6). 

 Because Coscarelli has not filed a timely notice of

appeal, his appeal is DISMISSED for lack of jurisdiction. 

Coscarelli’s request for a COA is DENIED as moot. 

 APPEAL DISMISSED; COA DENIED AS MOOT.
### §2234. Authority exceeded in executing warrant

Whoever, in executing a search warrant, willfully exceeds his authority or exercises it with unnecessary severity, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than one year, or both.

(June 25, 1948, ch. 645, 62 Stat. 803; Pub. L. 104–294, title VI, §601(a)(8), Oct. 11, 1996, 110 Stat. 3498; Pub. L. 107–273, div. B, title III, §3002(a)(3), Nov. 2, 2002, 116 Stat. 1805.)

#### Historical and Revision Notes

Based on title 18, U.S.C., 1940 ed., §631 (June 15, 1917, ch. 30, title XI, §21, 40 Stat. 230).

Minor changes were made in phraseology.

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

2002—Pub. L. 107–273 inserted ", or both" after "year".

1996—Pub. L. 104–294 substituted "fined under this title" for "fined not more than $1,000".
<PAGE>   1
 
<TABLE>
<S>                                  <C>
                                     ----------------------------------------------------------------
                                     Suite 900                        Telephone: (313) 396-3000
                                     600 Renaissance Center
LOGO                                 Detroit, Michigan 48243-1704
</TABLE>
 
                                                                      EXHIBIT 23
 
INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' CONSENT
 
     We consent to the incorporation by reference of our report dated January
18, 1996, appearing in this Annual Report on Form 10-K of Chrysler Corporation
for the year ended December 31, 1995, in the following Registration Statements:
 
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
          REGISTRATION
FORM     STATEMENT NO.                                 DESCRIPTION
----    ----------------    ------------------------------------------------------------------
<C>     <C>                 <S>
S-8         33-5588         Chrysler Salaried Employees' Savings Plan
S-8         33-6117         Chrysler Corporation Stock Option Plan
S-3         33-13739        Chrysler Corporation Common Stock deliverable to Selling
                            stockholder named therein
S-3         33-15716        Chrysler Corporation Common Stock deliverable to Selling
                            stockholders named therein
S-8         33-15544        Chrysler Corporation Common Stock deliverable pursuant to the 1972
        (Post-Effective     and 1980 American Motors Corporation Stock Option Plans
        Amendment No. 1)
S-3         33-15849        Chrysler Corporation Debt Securities
S-3         33-22233        Chrysler Corporation Common Stock deliverable to Selling
                            stockholders named therein
S-3         33-39688        Chrysler Corporation Common Stock deliverable to Selling
                            stockholders named therein
S-8         33-47986        Chrysler Corporation 1991 Stock Compensation Plan
S-3         33-59294        Chrysler Corporation Common Stock deliverable to Selling
                            stockholders named therein
S-8         33-55817        Chrysler Corporation 1991 Stock Compensation Plan
</TABLE>
 
DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP
 
January 19, 1996
 
LOGO
Exhibit
3.1
 CERTIFICATE OF LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
 OF
 MEMORIAL PRODUCTION PARTNERS LP
 Limited
Partnership Del. C. et seq.
    
  By:
    Memorial Production Partners GP LLC,its general partner By:
    /s/ Lorena NicholsName:
    Lorena NicholsTitle:
    Authorized Person
### §5205. Use of income on endowment

#### (a), (b) Repealed. Pub. L. 104–134, title I, §101[(a)] [title IV, §407], Apr. 26, 1996, 110 Stat. 1321, 1321–45; renumbered title I, Pub. L. 104–140, §1(a), May 2, 1996, 110 Stat. 1327

#### (c) Agricultural exchange program

For any fiscal year, as may be determined by Eisenhower Exchange Fellowships, Incorporated, a portion of the amounts made available to Eisenhower Exchange Fellowships, Incorporated, pursuant to section 5203(a) of this title shall be used to provide fellowships for agricultural exchange programs for farmers from the United States and foreign countries.

#### (d) Participation by United States minority populations

In order to ensure that the United States fellows participating in programs of the Eisenhower Exchange Fellowships, Incorporated, are representative of the cultural, ethnic, and racial diversity of the American people, of the amounts made available to Eisenhower Exchange Fellowships, Incorporated, pursuant to section 5203(a) of this title which are obligated and expended for United States fellowship programs, not less than 10 percent shall be available only for participation by individuals who are representative of United States minority populations.

(Pub. L. 101–454, §6, Oct. 24, 1990, 104 Stat. 1065; Pub. L. 104–134, title I, §101[(a)] [title IV, §407], Apr. 26, 1996, 110 Stat. 1321, 1321–45; renumbered title I, Pub. L. 104–140, §1(a), May 2, 1996, 110 Stat. 1327.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

1996—Subsec. (a). Pub. L. 104–134 struck out heading and text of subsec. (a). Text read as follows: "For any fiscal year, not less than 50 percent of the amounts made available to Eisenhower Exchange Fellowships, Incorporated, pursuant to section 5203(a) of this title shall be available only to assist United States fellows in traveling to and studying in emerging European democracies."

Subsec. (b). Pub. L. 104–134 struck out heading and text of subsec. (b). Text read as follows: "For any fiscal year, not more than 50 percent of the amounts made available to Eisenhower Exchange Fellowships, Incorporated, pursuant to section 5203(a) of this title shall be available to assist foreign fellows in traveling to and studying in the United States."
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY ELEV

 219.49

 220.30

 221.70

 222.41

 219.25

 221.31

 221.99

 221.52

 221.32

 222.69

 223.07

 219.62

 221.15

 220.80

 220.41

 220.61

 220.67

 220.52

 218.88

 219.94

 219.99

 221.27

 221.29

 222.32

 221.80

 219.20

 219.75

 220.31

 220.02

 220.14

 221.07

 41,836

 43,931

 47,598

 49,474

 41,221

 46,574

 48,360

 47,125

 46,600

 50,219

 51,233

 42,170

 46,154

 45,237

 44,218

 44,740

 44,897

 44,505

 40,280

 42,997

 43,126

 46,469

 46,521

 49,235

 47,861

 41,093

 42,505

 43,957

 43,204

 43,515

 45,944

STORAGE

-1,394

+2,095

+3,667

+1,876

-8,253

+5,353

+1,786

-1,235

-525

+3,619

+1,014

-9,063

+3,984

-917

-1,019

+522

+157

-392

-4,225

+2,717

+129

+3,343

+52

+2,714

-1,374

-6,768

+1,412

+1,452

-753

+311

+2,429

CHANGE

3,617

3,733

3,781

3,870

3,783

3,736

3,733

3,705

3,680

3,676

3,643

3,646

3,667

3,699

3,691

3,723

3,691

3,695

3,695

3,648

3,635

3,529

3,431

3,415

3,440

3,485

3,473

3,350

3,412

3,420

3,447

PUMPING

 3,867

 1,237

 1,347

 2,309

 2,793

 1,372

 1,799

 1,922

 1,625

 1,179

 1,170

 1,306

 1,281

 1,419

 1,966

 1,934

 1,913

 1,837

 1,955

 2,022

 1,876

 2,189

 2,294

 2,182

 2,200

 2,023

 2,002

 2,381

 2,947

 3,443

 3,367

PUMPING

 4,996

 6,008

 7,685

 7,920

 12,369

 7,065

 8,443

 9,624

 9,903

 8,379

 8,943

 13,773

 7,422

 10,020

 4,650

 4,028

 4,249

 4,429

 6,328

 2,791

 8,775

 7,041

 8,457

 6,994

 6,675

 9,437

 4,866

 4,556

 7,671

 7,074

 5,494

PUMPING

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

GEN.

*

-20

+282

+445

+464

+310

+532

+531

+421

+839

+636

+254

+513

+504

+465

+154

+240

+353

+293

+323

+490

+1,838

+1,199

+759

+551

+42

+625

+219

+95

+439

+284

+214

OR

UNITED STATES 

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION

CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT

CONSOLIDATED STATE-FEDERAL O'NEILL FOREBAY February 25, 2003

DAILY OPERATIONS

JANUARY 2003 RUN DATE:

IN LAKE GEN.

ACRE-FEET O'NEILL

RELEASE - C.F.S. 

TOTALS +2,714 112,149 0 226,065 63,157 +14,294

ACRE-FEET +2,714 222,448 0 448,400 125,272

SUMMARY

 109

RELEASE (ACRE-FEET)

O'NEILL GEN. 0

SAN LUIS PUMP 448,400 109

 43,230

DOS AMIGOS PUMP 125,272

DELIVERIES 

S. LUIS O'NEILL

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

CALIF. DOS AMIGOS

AQUEDUCT

4,564

4,285

6,655

6,841

6,907

6,867

6,878

6,798

6,744

7,070

6,728

6,351

6,541

6,813

2,257

2,262

2,197

2,079

2,135

2,045

5,243

6,187

6,586

6,579

4,700

3,938

3,887

4,224

6,388

6,969

6,479

 164,197

 325,685

S. LUIS

DELIV.

GAINS(+)

LOSS(-)

C.F.S.

INFLOW - C.F.S

STATE OF CALIFORNIA

THE RESOURCES AGENCY

DEPARTMENT OF WATER RESOURCES

STATE WATER PROJECT

TOTAL 573,781

 28,352

* DAILY DEL. FIGURES UNAVAILABLE. TOT. DEL. IS INCLUDED IN COMPUTING MONTHLY TOTALS 

Table 18
Order entered April 3, 2014

In The 

## Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

No. 05 - 14 - 00037 - CV IN THE INTEREST OF J.D.B., A CHILD On Appeal from the 304th Judicial District Court

Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 12 - 771 - W



### O RDER We GRANT appellants’ March 31, 2014 motion for an extension of time to file a brief TO THE EXTENT that appellants shall file their brief on or before APRIL 21, 2014
. /s/ ELIZABETH LANG

- MIERS JUSTICE
STORAGE - A.F. RESERVOIR CHANGE NEW MELONES NATURAL ACCUM * FULL

Day DONNELLS

RESERVOIR

BEARDSLEY

RESERVOIR

TOTAL A.F. C.F.S. INFLOW C.F.S RIVER C.F.S NATURAL 

1000 A.F.

1 42,156 70,887 113,043 83 42 442 484 18.2

2 41,635 71,528 113,163 120 60 258 318 18.8

3 41,120 72,101 113,221 58 29 188 217 19.2

4 40,682 72,597 113,279 58 29 175 204 19.6

5 40,447 72,592 113,039 -240 -121 280 159 19.9

6 40,780 72,732 113,512 473 238 287 525 21.0

7 40,812 73,014 113,826 314 158 338 496 22.0

8 40,715 73,340 114,055 229 115 550 665 23.3

9 40,325 73,848 114,173 118 59 263 322 23.9

10 39,882 74,389 114,271 98 49 256 305 24.5

11 39,702 74,653 114,355 84 42 234 276 25.1

12 39,637 74,802 114,439 84 42 212 254 25.6

13 39,527 74,996 114,523 84 42 230 272 26.1

14 39,404 75,222 114,626 103 52 240 292 26.7

15 39,258 75,456 114,714 88 44 229 273 27.2

16 39,315 75,469 114,784 70 35 194 229 27.7

17 39,397 75,489 114,886 102 51 247 298 28.3

18 39,476 75,495 114,971 85 43 224 267 28.8

19 39,559 75,502 115,061 90 45 226 271 29.4

20 39,623 75,515 115,138 77 39 216 255 29.9

21 39,699 75,521 115,220 82 41 213 254 30.4

22 39,774 75,534 115,308 88 44 192 236 30.8

23 39,853 75,547 115,400 92 46 196 242 31.3

24 39,936 75,560 115,496 96 48 263 311 31.9

25 40,023 75,573 115,596 100 50 230 280 32.5

26 40,105 75,586 115,691 95 48 216 264 33.0

27 40,185 75,598 115,783 92 46 275 321 33.6

28 40,260 75,611 115,871 88 44 245 289 34.2

29 40,332 75,624 115,956 85 43 293 336 34.9

30 40,397 75,637 116,034 78 39 195 234 35.3

Totals 3,074 9,149

Acre - Feet 18,147

* October 1, 2022 to date

Historical Archive and Report Database

Full Natural Flow At New Melones Dam

 November 2022 

 Run Date: 4/21/2023
AMENDMENT TO EXECUTIVE
                              EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT

                            DATED SEPTEMBER 15, 1997

     Reference  is  made  to the  Executive  Employment  Agreement  dated  as of
September 15, 1997 (the "Agreement") by and between J. Baker, Inc. and Stuart M.
Glasser. Pursuant to paragraph 25 of the Agreement and in order to further amend
certain provisions of the Agreement, the Agreement is hereby amended as follows:

     1.  Paragraph 7 of the  Agreement is hereby  amended by deleting the phrase
"to and including the date immediately  preceding the third  anniversary of this
Agreement"  in the fourth line  thereof and  inserting  in its place  "ending on
April 30, 2001."

     2. All other terms of the Agreement shall remain  unchanged and continue in
full force and effect.



J. BAKER, INC.


By:    /s/ Alan I. Weinstein              12/27/99
   -----------------------------          -----------
         Alan I. Weinstein                Date
         President and
         Chief Executive Officer




   /s/ Stuart M. Glasser                  12/23/99
--------------------------------          -----------
         Stuart M. Glasser                Date