alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY HIGH

 844

 857

 853

 842

 841

 848

 847

 843

 832

 841

 832

 830

 818

 818

 864

 869

 878

 896

 894

 882

 889

 830

 844

 811

 811

 839

 840

 811

 785

 758

 722

 691

 656

 670

 675

 673

 657

 662

 687

 679

 691

 673

 686

 671

 697

 706

 717

 717

 713

 711

 701

 708

 715

 673

 699

 701

 688

 689

 640

 641

 606

 610

 736

 741

 739

 733

 731

 731

 743

 746

 739

 741

 733

 738

 730

 738

 760

 757

 765

 776

 778

 765

 777

 741

 733

 730

 736

 741

 757

 733

 715

 694

 667

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

JANUARY 2012 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: February 16, 2012

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

HOLLAND TRACT ON OLD RIVER
```

[Congressional Bills 114th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 3789 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

114th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 3789

   To amend title 38, United States Code, to direct the Secretary of 
     Veterans Affairs to furnish a memorial headstone or marker to 
  commemorate an eligible individual whose remains are identified and 
        available but the location of the gravesite is unknown.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            October 21, 2015

  Mr. Guinta introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                     Committee on Veterans' Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
   To amend title 38, United States Code, to direct the Secretary of 
     Veterans Affairs to furnish a memorial headstone or marker to 
  commemorate an eligible individual whose remains are identified and 
        available but the location of the gravesite is unknown.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Honor Our Fallen Heroes Act of 
2015''.

SEC. 2. DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS HEADSTONES AND MARKERS FOR 
              INDIVIDUALS WHOSE REMAINS ARE IDENTIFIED AND AVAILABLE 
              BUT THE LOCATION OF THE GRAVESITE IS UNKNOWN.

    (a) In General.--Section 2306(b)(1) of title 38, United States 
Code, is amended by inserting before the period at the end of the first 
sentence the following: ``or an eligible individual whose remains are 
identified and available but the location of the gravesite is 
unknown''.
    (b) Applicability.--The amendment made by subsection (a) shall 
apply with respect to deaths occurring before, on, or after the date of 
the enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
#### Tompkins County Co-operative Fire Insurance Company, Respondent, v. Delaware, Lackawanna and Western Railroad Company, Appellant.

Order reversed, with costs, motion denied and verdict of the jury reinstated, with costs. All concurred.
A-AA+Skip to content

                  - Home
                  - Compendium Statistics
                  - Event
                  - Archives
                  - Glossary
                  - Help
                  - Contact
                  - Research on Disability

Annual Disability Statistics Compendium

              - Home /
              - Archives /
              - 2012 Compendium Statistics /
              - 2012 Employment /
              - 2012 2.11 Full-Time, Year-Round - Civilians with Disabilities Ages 18-64 Years Living in the Community for the U.S.

## Table 2.11: Employment: Full-Time, Year-Round (FTYR)—Civilians with Disabilities Ages 16 to 64 Years Living in the Community for the United States and States: 2011

----

----

 

----

#### 2012 Disability Compendium

                        - Home
                        - Compendium Statistics                           - Population and Prevelance
                          - Employment
                          - Time Trend Population Statistics
                          - Poverty
                          - Earnings
                          - Veterans
                          - Health Insurance Coverage
                          - Health
                          - Social Security Administration Programs
                          - Medicaid and Medicare
                          - Special Education
                          - Vocational Rehabilitation
                          - Federal Government Spending and Employment
                          - International Disability Statistics
                          - Population Statistics: Disability Type
                        - Event
                        - Archives                           - 2012 Compendium Statistics
                        - Glossary
                        - Help
                        - Contact
                        - Research on Disability

#### Funding for this project is made possible by:

 The Research and Training Center on Disability Statistics and Demographics (StatsRRTC), which is funded by the U.S. Department of Education, National Institute for Disability and Rehabilitation Research, under cooperative agreements H133B080012.

#### Stay Connected

**Institute on Disability**10 West Edge Drive, Suite 101Durham, NH 03824603.862.4320 | relay: 711 | [email protected]www.iod.unh.edu

© 2013. Institute on Disability.University of New Hampshire.
§ 76.761 Federal funds may pay 100 percent of cost. Cross Reference
Link to an amendment published at 89 FR 70340 , Aug. 29, 2024.
A State or a subgrantee may use program funds to pay up to 100 percent of the cost of a project if: ( a ) The State or subgrantee is not required to match the funds; and
( b ) The project can be assisted under the authorizing statute and implementing regulations for the program.
(Authority: 20 U.S.C. 1221e-3, 3474, and 6511(a))
(No. 73-CC-328

#### Better Hearing Center, Inc., Claimant, *vs.*State of Illinois, Division of Vocational Rehabilitation, Respondent.

*Opinion filed November 1, 1973.*

Better Hearing Center, Inc., Claimant, pro se.

William J. Scott, Attorney General; Edward L. S. Arkema, Jr., Assistant Attorney General, for Respondent.

Per Curiam.
#### Theodore A. Liebler and George C. Tyler, Respondents, v. The Bobbs-Merrill Company and Another, Appellants.

Order affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements. No opinion. Present — Ingraham, P. J., McLaughlin, Laughlin, Clarke and Scott, JJ.
### TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

JUDGMENT RENDERED JA NUARY 15, 2020

NO. 03

- 19

- 00234

- CV

Dr. Damon C. O’Gan, Appellant

v.

Scott Ogle, Appellee

APPEAL FROM COUNTY COURT AT LAW NO. 1 OF TRAVIS COUNTY

BEFORE JUSTICES GOODWIN, BA KER, AND KELLY AFFIRMED IN PART; REVERSED AND REMANDED I N PART

—

OPINION BY JUSTICE BAKER

This is an appeal from the interlocutory order signed by the tr i a l court on April 3, 2019 . Having

reviewed the record and the parties’ arguments, the Court holds that there was no reversible error

in that portion of the order granting appellant ’ s motion to d ismis s appellee ’ s claims of intentional

infliction of emotional distress and unjust enrichment

, as well as that portion of the order

denying appellant ’ s motion to dismiss appellee ’ s claims under the Texas Theft Liability Act

.

Ther e f ore , the Court affirms th ose portion s of the trial court ’ s interlocutory order. The Court

further holds that there was reversible error in that portion of the order denying appellant ’ s

request for at torney ’ s fe es and costs incurred in defending against appellee ’ s claims of

intentional infliction of emotional distress and unjust enrichment

. Therefore, the Court reverses

t hat portion of the trial court’s interlocutory order and remands the case to the trial court for adetermination of fee s and costs to which appellant is entitle d. A ppell ee shall pay all costs

relat ing to this appeal, both in this Court and in the court below.
### §3414. Office of Elementary and Secondary Education; inclusion of Office of Migrant Education

There shall be in the Department an Office of Elementary and Secondary Education, to be administered by the Assistant Secretary for Elementary and Secondary Education appointed under section 3412(b) of this title. The Assistant Secretary shall administer such functions affecting elementary and secondary education, both public and private, as the Secretary shall delegate. There shall be within the Office of Elementary and Secondary Education and directly under the supervision of the Assistant Secretary for Elementary and Secondary Education, an Office of Migrant Education, which shall be responsible for the administration of programs established by part C of title I of the Elementary and Secondary Education Act of 1965 [20 U.S.C. 6391 et seq.] and by subpart 5 of part A of title IV of the Higher Education Act of 1965 [20 U.S.C. 1070d–2].

(Pub. L. 96–88, title II, §204, Oct. 17, 1979, 93 Stat. 674; Pub. L. 98–511, title VII, §701(a), Oct. 19, 1984, 98 Stat. 2405; Pub. L. 103–382, title III, §391(h), Oct. 20, 1994, 108 Stat. 4023.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

The Elementary and Secondary Education Act of 1965, referred to in text, is Pub. L. 89–10, Apr. 11, 1965, 79 Stat. 27. Part C of title I of the Act is classified generally to part C (§6391 et seq.) of subchapter I of chapter 70 of this title. For complete classification of this Act to the Code, see Short Title note set out under section 6301 of this title and Tables.

The Higher Education Act of 1965, referred to in text, is Pub. L. 89–329, Nov. 8, 1965, 79 Stat. 1219. Subpart 5 of part A of title IV of the Act is classified generally to subpart 5 (§1070d–2) of part A of subchapter IV of chapter 28 of this title. For complete classification of this Act to the Code, see Short Title note set out under section 1001 of this title and Tables.

#### Amendments

1994—Pub. L. 103–382 substituted "part C" for "subpart 1 of part B".

1984—Pub. L. 98–511 inserted provisions establishing the Office of Migrant Education and specifying its functions.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date of 1984 Amendment

Amendment by Pub. L. 98–511 effective Oct. 19, 1984, see section 711(a) of Pub. L. 98–511, set out as a note under section 1226c of this title.
```

[Congressional Bills 114th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 3711 Received in Senate (RDS)]

<DOC>
114th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 3711

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                            December 8, 2016

                                Received

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
    To authorize the Secretary of the Interior to conduct a special 
 resource study of Chicano Park, located in San Diego, California, and 
                          for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Chicano Park Preservation Act''.

SEC. 2. SPECIAL RESOURCE STUDY.

    (a) Study.--The Secretary of the Interior shall conduct a special 
resource study of Chicano Park and its murals located in San Diego, 
California.
    (b) Contents.--In conducting the study under subsection (a), the 
Secretary shall--
            (1) evaluate the national significance of the site;
            (2) determine the suitability and feasibility of 
        designating the site as a National Historic Landmark or 
        Affiliated Area of the National Park System;
            (3) consider other alternatives for preservation, 
        protection, and interpretation of Chicano Park and its murals 
        by Federal, State, or local governmental entities, or private 
        and nonprofit organizations;
            (4) consult with interested Federal, State, or local 
        governmental entities, private and nonprofit organizations or 
        any other interested individuals; and
            (5) identify cost estimates for any development, 
        interpretation, operation, and maintenance associated with the 
        alternatives.
    (c) Applicable Law.--The study required under subsection (a) shall 
be conducted in accordance with section 100507 of title 54, United 
States Code, except that the study shall not consider any options that 
involve Federal acquisition of lands, interests in lands, or any other 
property related to the Chicano Park and its murals.
    (d) Report.--Not later than 18 months after the date on which funds 
are first made available for the study under subsection (a), the 
Secretary shall submit to the Committee on Natural Resources of the 
House of Representatives and the Committee on Energy and Natural 
Resources of the Senate a report containing the results of the study 
and any conclusions and recommendations of the Secretary.

            Passed the House of Representatives December 7, 2016.

            Attest:

                                                 KAREN L. HAAS,

                                                                 Clerk.
```
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Bridget M. McCormack, Chief Justice

David F. Viviano,

Chief Justice Pro Tem

Stephen J. Markman

Brian K. Zahra

Richard H. Bernstein

Elizabeth T. Clement

Megan K. Cavanagh,

Justices

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

 May 28, 2020

Order 

Clerk

May 28, 2020

161233

MARIO MONTANO

Plaintiff,

v SC: 161233

COURT OF APPEALS, Defendant. 

____________________________________/

On order of the Chief Justice, the motion to dismiss the complaint for superintending 

control and to withdraw all motions is GRANTED. The case is dismissed.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

DAY

 49,960

 49,822

 49,699

 49,545

 49,388

 49,173

 48,897

 48,417

 47,919

 47,654

 47,483

 47,339

 47,161

 46,888

 46,726

 46,561

 46,406

 46,214

 46,161

 45,977

 45,651

 45,333

 45,139

 44,878

 44,788

 44,703

 44,602

 44,495

 44,343

 44,201

 57,617

 57,723

 57,816

 57,952

 58,082

 58,288

 58,583

 58,987

 59,473

 59,747

 59,908

 60,033

 60,193

 60,444

 60,594

 60,725

 60,857

 61,019

 61,043

 61,205

 61,493

 61,782

 61,956

 62,203

 62,282

 62,367

 62,451

 62,542

 62,681

 62,808

STORAGE - A.F. 

 107,577

 107,545

 107,515

 107,497

 107,470

 107,461

 107,480

 107,404

 107,392

 107,401

 107,391

 107,372

 107,354

 107,332

 107,320

 107,286

 107,263

 107,233

 107,204

 107,182

 107,144

 107,115

 107,095

 107,081

 107,070

 107,070

 107,053

 107,037

 107,024

 107,009

328

200

222

295

274

258

296

420

131

278

205

141

423

291

235

219

352

165

161

193

310

307

178

270

279

207

261

322

413

428

317

184

207

286

260

253

306

447

125

283

200

131

414

280

229

202

340

150

146

182

291

292

168

263

273

207

252

314

406

420

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

SEPTEMBER 2021 FULL NATURAL FLOW AT NEW MELONES DAM RUN DATE: 10/08/2021

TOTALS -590 7,828

* October 1,

15,527

 342.9

 343.2

 343.7

 344.2

 344.7

 345.2

 345.9

 346.7

 347.0

 347.5

 347.9

 348.2

 349.0

 349.6

 350.0

 350.4

 351.1

 351.4

 351.7

 352.1

 352.6

 353.2

 353.5

 354.1

 354.6

 355.0

 355.5

 356.1

 356.9

 357.8

DONNELLS

RES

BEARDSLEY

RES

2020 TO DATE

NEW

MELONES

INFLOW

C.F.S

NATURAL

RIVER

C.F.S

ACCUM *

FULL

NATURAL

1000 A.F.

RESERVOIR

TOTAL

-22

-32

-30

-18

-27

-9

+19

-76

-12

+9

-10

-19

-18

-22

-12

-34

-23

-30

-29

-22

-38

-29

-20

-14

-11

+0

-17

-16

-13

-15

CHANGE

A.F. C.F.S.

-11

-16

-15

-9

-14

-5

+10

-38

-6

+5

-5

-10

-9

-11

-6

-17

-12

-15

-15

-11

-19

-15

-10

-7

-6

+0

-9

-8

-7

-8

ACRE-FEET
## S IXTH 

## D ISTRICT 

## C OURT OF 

## A PPEAL 

## S TATE OF 

## F LORIDA

_____________________________
Case No. 6D2 3

- 2908 Lower Tribunal No. 2020

- CA

- 00 9787

- O

_____________________________
F OWLER , O’Q UINN , F EENEY & S NEED , P.A.
, Appellant
,

v.

A EGIS B USINESS S TRATEGIES , L TD ., L YNDON B ROWN , N AADIR C ASSIM , C HRISTIAN R EAD O’Q UINN , as Personal Representative of the E STATE OF M ICHAEL A LLEN O’Q UINN , and M ICHAEL O’Q UINN , P.A.,
Appellee s

.

_____________________________ Appeal from the Circuit Court for Orange County

. Jeffrey L. Ashton , Judge.

May 21 , 2024

PER CURIAM

.

AFFIRMED

.

NARDELLA
, WOZNIAK and SMITH, JJ
., c oncur.

William G. Osborne, of William G. Osborne, P.A., Orlando, for Appellant.

Benjamin Webster and Katherine Thanos , of Morgan & Morgan, P.A., Orlando, for Appellee Aegis Business Strategies, Ltd

.2 No A ppearance for Appellees
, Lyndon Brown, Naadir Cassim , Christian Read O’Quinn, as Personal Representative of the Estate of Michaell Allen O’Quinn, or Michael O’Quinn, P.A.

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND DISPOSITION THEREOF IF TIMELY FILED
#### Benno Kleeblatt, Respondent, v. Cadillac Silk Company, Inc., Appellant.

No opinion. The date for the examination to proceed to be fixed in •.the order. Settle order on notice. Present — Martin, P. J., Townley, Untervmyer, Cohn and Callahan, JJ.
* Pursuant to Local Rule 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent

except under the limited circumstances set forth in Local Rule

47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 96-50470

Summary Calendar

 

JOHN WILLIAM WINSLOW,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus

BOB OWENS, Texas Board of 

Pardons and Paroles,

Defendant-Appellee.

- - - - - - - - - -

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Western District of Texas

USDC No. A-95-CV-783

- - - - - - - - - -

October 9, 1996

Before DAVIS, EMILIO M. GARZA and STEWART, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

John William Winslow appeals the dismissal of his suit as

frivolous. Winslow contends that he has a liberty interest in

the applicable parole procedures and that the district court

erred in denying his request that it convene a three-judge panel

to consider his constitutional claims. We have reviewed the

record and Winslow’s brief and AFFIRM the district court’s
No. 96-50470

- 2 -

dismissal for essentially the same reasons adopted by the

district court. Winslow v. Owens, A-95-CV-783 (W.D. Tex. May 30,

1996).

AFFIRMED.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

DAY ELEV

 1,048.35

 1,048.20

 1,048.15

 1,048.16

 1,048.14

 1,048.13

 1,047.89

 1,047.63

 1,047.31

 1,047.07

 1,046.67

 1,046.47

 1,046.28

 1,046.14

 1,045.98

 1,045.81

 1,045.69

 1,045.44

 1,045.26

 1,045.19

 1,045.08

 1,044.88

 1,044.76

 1,044.58

 1,044.43

 1,044.30

 1,044.16

 1,044.04

 1,043.95

 1,043.82

 1,956.9

 1,955.3

 1,954.7

 1,954.9

 1,954.6

 1,954.5

 1,951.9

 1,949.1

 1,945.6

 1,943.0

 1,938.6

 1,936.5

 1,934.4

 1,932.9

 1,931.1

 1,929.3

 1,928.0

 1,925.3

 1,923.4

 1,922.6

 1,921.4

 1,919.3

 1,918.0

 1,916.0

 1,914.4

 1,913.0

 1,911.5

 1,910.2

 1,909.2

 1,907.8

STORAGE

-2.8

-1.6

-0.5

+0.1

-0.2

-0.1

-2.6

-2.8

-3.5

-2.6

-4.3

-2.2

-2.1

-1.5

-1.7

-1.8

-1.3

-2.7

-1.9

-0.8

-1.2

-2.2

-1.3

-1.9

-1.6

-1.4

-1.5

-1.3

-1.0

-1.4

CHANGE

2,142

1,947

1,768

1,758

1,847

1,893

1,730

1,390

1,093

1,036

1,163

1,318

1,366

1,294

1,451

1,261

1,215

990

1,144

1,179

1,149

1,161

1,263

1,107

1,274

1,065

1,142

1,082

1,013

738

INFLOW

 3,482

 2,642

 1,898

 1,526

 1,791

 1,814

 2,916

 2,701

 2,743

 2,199

 3,209

 2,266

 2,241

 1,881

 2,144

 2,048

 1,715

 2,238

 1,983

 1,428

 1,581

 2,092

 1,706

 1,876

 1,796

 1,625

 1,725

 1,556

 1,341

 1,268

POWER

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

SPILL

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

OUTLET

 92

 131

 145

 177

 166

 134

 134

 116

 106

 155

 144

 147

 165

 179

 182

 140

 154

 115

 143

 133

 168

 157

 209

 209

 293

 146

 178

 178

 160

 174

C.F.S.

 .26

 .37

 .41

 .50

 .47

 .38

 .38

 .33

 .30

 .44

 .41

 .42

 .47

 .51

 .52

 .40

 .44

 .33

 .41

 .38

 .48

 .45

 .60

 .60

 .84

 .42

 .51

 .51

 .46

 .50

INCHES

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

PRECIP

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

JUNE 2018 NEW MELONES LAKE DAILY OPERATIONS RUN DATE: July 2, 2018

IN LAKE

EVAPORATION

INCHES

C.F.S.

COMPUTED*

1000 ACRE-FEET

RELEASE - C.F.S.

TOTALS -51.7 39,979 61,431 0 0 4,730 13.50 .00

ACRE-FEET -51,700 79,298 121,848 0 0 9,382

COMMENTS:

SUMMARY

RELEASE (ACRE-FEET)

POWER 121,848

SPILL 0

OUTLET

TOTAL

 0

 121,848

PRECIPITATION

THIS MONTH =

TO DATE =

 .00

JULY 1, 2017 21.11

 1,959.8

Table 13 

OCT 1, 2017 TO DATE = 21.01
### IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 16

- 40507 Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff

- Appellee

v.
JOSE JESUS LOPEZ

- TREVINO , Defendant

- Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. 7:15

- CR

- 1635

- 1

Before D ENNIS, PRADO, and OWEN, Circuit Judges

. PER CURIAM: *
The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Jose Jesus Lopez

Trevino has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance
with Anders v. California , 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores , 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Lopez

- Trevino has filed a r esponse. We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected
therein , as well as Lopez

- Trevino ’ s response . We concur with counsel’s

* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5 , the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit 

### FILED Decem ber 20 , 2016 Lyle W. Cayce Clerk Case: 16-40507 Document: 00513804378 Page: 1 Date Filed: 12/20/2016No. 16

- 40507

2 assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. Accordin gly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5 TH C IR

. R. 42.2. Case: 16-40507 Document: 00513804378 Page: 2 Date Filed: 12/20/2016