alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
No. 12,191.

#### Great Western Finance Company *v.*Davis, et al.

Decided November 5, 1928.

Mr. J. Nelson Truitt, Mr. R. P. Shatz, for plaintiff in error.

Mr. William H. Andrew, for defendants in error..

*539
      *Department*Two.

Me. Justice Butleb

delivered the opinion of the court.

Lymon B. Davis and Kathleen Davis, husband and wife, recovered a judgment against The Great Western Finance Company before a justice of the peace. On appeal, the county court also rendered judgment in their favor.

As the action was commenced before a justice of the peace, we have no pleadings to aid us in determining the nature of the action. However, the plaintiffs’ requests for instructions at the trial in the county court, and the instructions given by the court, state that the action was brought for damages for the breach of a contract to give a lease of certain residence property on Milwaukee street in Denver. The plaintiffs, the defendant and the county court agreed that such was the nature of the action; and that is the plaintiffs’ claim in this •court. We will consider the action, therefore, as one brought for that purpose.

Mrs. Stansfield was the owner of the property, and the finance company was her agent, authorized to rent the property for her. Mr. Riedel, who was in the employ of another company, obtained from the finance company permission to find a tenant for the property. The plaintiffs contend that, through Riedel and the finance company, they obtained a binding agreement to lease the property to them for one year; that there was a breach of that agreement in this, that the lease was not given to them, but was given to others, and that when, at Riedel’s suggestion, the plaintiffs attempted to move into the house, they were not permitted to do so.

Assuming that the evidence proves all that the plaintiffs claim for it, the owner would be bound by the contract to give a lease to the plaintiffs; the owner, therefore, not her agent, the finance company, would be liable for a breach of that contract. When a real estate agent, *540acting in behalf of the owner, and with authority to do so, agrees to lease the owner’s property, the owner, not the agent, is bound by that agreement. Whether there was a binding contract, or a breach thereof, it would not be proper for us to determine in this action, the owner not being a party. The finance company is not sued for making the contract in behalf of the owner without having authority to do so, assuming or falsely representing that it had such authority; but is sued, as we have seen, for the breach of a contract to which it is not a party.

The judgment is reversed, and the cause is remanded with the direction to dismiss the action.

Mr. Chief Justice Denison, Mr. Justice Adams and Mr. Justice Campbell concur.
UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA

ALEXANDRIA DIVISION

IN RE: ) CASE NO.: 19-10812-BFK

)

ORLANDO M. PERDOMO, JR., )

) CHAPTER: 7

 Debtor )

REQUEST FOR NOTICES

COMES NOW, David C. Whitridge, of the firm of Thompson, O'Brien, Kemp & Nasuti, 

P.C., and files this Request for Notices as attorney for, FORA FINANCIAL, a creditor and party in 

interest in the above-styled case, and hereby requests receipt of all notices and orders entered in this 

case.

Respectfully submitted this 3

rd of June, 2019.

/s/David C. Whitridge

David C. Whitridge

Georgia State Bar No. 754793

For the Firm of

THOMPSON, O'BRIEN, KEMP & NASUTI, P.C.

40 Technology Parkway South, Suite 300

Peachtree Corners, Georgia 30092

(770) 925-0111

dwhitridge@tokn.com

Case 19-10812-BFK Doc 29 Filed 06/03/19 Entered 06/03/19 11:13:25 Desc Main

Document Page 1 of 1
#### County of Nassau, Respondent, v. Joseph P. Day et al., as Trustees, Appellants, et al., Defendants.

Present — Hagarty, Carswell, Adel, Taylor and Lewis, JJ.
|  |  | [if !vml]>[endif]>

You have  reached the Federal Depository Library Program Electronic Collection  (FDLP/EC) Archive. This archive assures ongoing access to publications in the  FDLP/EC. Access to publications in the archive is available through GPO's  suite of cataloging and locator services, including the Catalog of U.S.  Government Publications (CGP).
Title:    National compensation survey. Hartford-West    Hartford-Willimantic, CT.  
 
SuDocs Number:[if !vml]>[endif]>[if !vml]>[endif]>L 2.121/7:H 25/

Item    Number:[if !vml]>[endif]>0768-B-07    (online)
GPO    System Number: 000867286
 
 
 
2007
 
2008
 
2009
 
2010
 
 
 
A service of the Superintendent of Documents,  U.S. Government Printing Office..

 

Last updated: May 11, 2020  Page Name:  http://permanent.access.gpo.gov/
perm |
|--|--|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
(No. 74-CC-304

#### Clock Tower Inn, Claimant, *vs.*State of Illinois, Department of Business and Economic Development, Respondent.

*Opinion filed February 20, 1974.*

Clock Tower Inn, Claimant, pro se.

William J. Scott, Attorney General; Edward L. S. Arkema, Jr., Assistant Attorney General, for Respondent.

Per Curiam.
<PAGE>
                                   EXHIBIT 32

                               CCFNB BANCORP, INC.

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                               18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

     In connection with this Quarterly Report of CCFNB Bancorp, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2005, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Lance
O. Diehl, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, and I ,Virginia D. Kocher, the
Principal Financial Officer of the company, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, certify
that:

     1.   this report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     2.   the information contained in this report fairly represents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of
          the Company.

Date: August 10, 2005

                                        /s/ Lance O. Diehl
                                        ----------------------------------------
                                        Lance O. Diehl
                                        Chief Executive Officer

Date: August 10, 2005

                                        /s/ Virginia D. Kocher
                                        ----------------------------------------
                                        Virginia D. Kocher
                                        Principal Financial Officer


                                       28
1

Troutman, Jake (FAA)

From: Troutman, Jake (FAA)

Sent: Thursday, February 12, 2015 12:09 PM

To: 'charles.lande@nee.com'

Cc: Pappas, Rob (FAA)

Subject: Request for Additional Information - NextEra Energy, Inc. [FAA-2014-0633]

Dear Mr. Charles Lande:

This letter is to inform you that the following information is missing from your petition (Docket No. FAA‐2014‐

0633).  This information is necessary for the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) to process your petition.

•             Describe the aircraft make(s) and model(s) for the proposed UAS operation.  The description(s) should include

the following: size, maximum weight (including payload), aircraft performance limitations, and aircraft type (i.e. ‐ fixed‐

wing,rotorcraft, lighter‐than‐air).  This information can be located in the aircraft manual(s).

•             Provide information regarding the radio frequency spectrum(s).  This information can be located in the aircraft

manual(s).

•             Provide a description of the proposed pilot medical requirements.

•             Your petition references a pre‐flight safety checklist  Describe the process used to determine if the UAS is

airworthy and in safe condition for operation in the NAS.

•             Your petition references the material listed below, however the material was not submitted for the

record.  Please provide a copy of the following referenced material:

o             manufacturer's user guide (Ref. pg. #10 petition and Appendix A pg. #3)

•             Please provide a flight operations manual (FOM) or similar guidance to be provided to UAS crews that, for

example, govern maximum altitudes and speeds, minimum flight visibility, distances from clouds, requirements and

procedures for using visual observers, and other requirements determined by NextEra to ensure the safety of UAS

operations.

Please submit the additional information (non‐proprietary) to your docket at www.regulations.gov and submit any

proprietary information to the FAA Headquarters or electronically via e‐mail to 333exemptions@faa.gov.  If you want us

to process your request any further, we must receive the information described above by 2/26/2015.  If we do not

receive the information, we will close the docket without notifying you further.

If you have any questions, please feel free to contact me at (202) 267‐9521.

Sincerely,

Jake J Troutman

Program Analyst | Rulemaking

FAA Office of Aviation Safety

Airmen and Airspace Rules Division

202‐267‐9521
###### Editorial Note on Part 40

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 40 appear by T.D. ATF-460, 66 FR 39094-39096, July 27, 2001; T.D. ATF-464, 66 FR 43479, Aug. 20, 2001; and T.D. TTB-91, 76 FR 5479, Feb. 1, 2011.

#### § 40.62 Application for permit.

Every person, before commencing business as a manufacturer of tobacco products as defined in § 40.11, shall make application for, and obtain, the permit provided in § 40.75, covering operations at each proposed factory. Such application shall be made on TTB F 5200.3, in duplicate, to the appropriate TTB officer. All documents required under this part to be furnished with such application shall be made a part thereof. Where the applicant for a permit under this section holds a permit or permits authorizing the production of any tobacco products at premises to be covered by the permit applied for, the applicant shall surrender such permit or permits for cancellation, upon the issuance of the permit applied for.

(72 Stat. 1421; 26 U.S.C 5712)
December 2022

 STORAGE1000 ACRE-FEET COMPUTED* RELEASE - C.F.S. EVAPORATION PRECIP

DAY ELEV IN LAKE CHANGE INFLOW

C.F.S. POWER SPILL OUTLET C. F. S. INCHES INCHES

586.0

1 875.26 586.7 0.7 583 232 0 0 13 0.08 0.00

2 875.32 587.0 0.3 232 73 0 0 3 0.02 1.24

3 875.47 587.8 0.8 557 159 0 0 8 0.05 0.07

4 875.85 589.8 2.0 1,222 225 0 0 8 0.05 1.92

5 876.04 590.7 1.0 760 258 0 0 7 0.04 0.02

6 876.32 592.2 1.5 935 197 0 0 5 0.03 0.08

7 876.60 593.6 1.5 879 138 0 0 8 0.05 0.00

8 876.84 594.9 1.2 878 240 0 0 10 0.06 0.00

9 877.02 595.8 0.9 798 319 0 0 8 0.05 0.03

10 877.61 598.9 3.1 2,111 556 0 0 3 0.02 0.38

11 878.46 603.3 4.4 2,333 76 0 0 14 0.08 2.33

12 878.97 606.0 2.7 1,410 58 0 0 3 0.02 0.52

13 879.28 607.7 1.6 970 144 0 0 2 0.01 0.00

14 879.56 609.1 1.5 833 82 0 0 7 0.04 0.00

15 879.90 610.9 1.8 934 23 0 0 7 0.04 0.00

16 880.11 612.0 1.1 919 350 0 0 9 0.05 0.00

17 880.32 613.2 1.1 847 273 0 0 12 0.07 0.00

18 880.63 614.8 1.6 918 82 0 0 7 0.04 0.00

19 880.85 616.0 1.2 961 366 0 0 7 0.04 0.00

20 881.14 617.5 1.5 879 97 0 0 5 0.03 0.00

21 881.43 619.1 1.5 886 99 0 0 7 0.04 0.00

22 881.68 620.4 1.3 906 227 0 0 7 0.04 0.00

23 881.99 622.0 1.7 887 49 0 0 5 0.03 0.00

24 882.23 623.3 1.3 848 193 0 0 7 0.04 0.00

25 882.52 624.9 1.6 911 116 0 0 12 0.07 0.00

26 882.85 626.6 1.8 946 49 0 0 5 0.03 0.00

27 884.41 635.1 8.4 4,401 153 0 0 7 0.04 2.05

28 885.37 640.3 5.2 2,667 38 0 0 2 0.01 1.00

29 885.98 643.6 3.3 1,708 28 0 0 5 0.03 0.22

30 888.10 655.2 11.6 5,957 84 0 0 4 0.02 1.09

31 896.52 702.8 47.5 24,001 41 0 0 0 0.00 2.39

TOTALS 116.7 64,077 5,025 0 0 207 1.22 13.34

ACRE-FEET 116,700 127,097 9,967 0 0 411

Comments: * COMPUTED INFLOW IS THE SUM OF CHANGE IN STORAGE, RELEASES, PUMPING AND EVAPORATION

 SUMMARY

Release (ACRE-FEET)

Power 9,967 Outlet 0

Spill 0 Total Releases 9,967

Precipitation

This month = 13.34

October 01, 2022 To date = 15.32

Historical Archive and Report Database

New Melones Lake Daily Operations

Run Date: 3/29/2023
### §241d–12. Repealed. Pub. L. 93–380, title I, §101(a)(4)(B), Aug. 21, 1974, 88 Stat. 496

Section, act Sept. 30, 1950, ch. 1124, title II, §132, as added Apr. 13, 1970, Pub. L. 91–230, title I, §113(b)(6), 84 Stat. 128, related to uses of funds for such special grants.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date of Repeal

Repeal effective July 1, 1975, pursuant to Pub. L. 93–380, §101(a)(4)(B).
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

DAY

 47,509

 48,653

 49,737

 50,987

 52,174

 53,048

 53,855

 54,563

 55,571

 56,490

 57,196

 57,795

 58,287

 58,649

 58,898

 59,361

 59,788

 60,234

 60,432

 60,493

 60,580

 60,630

 60,630

 60,986

 61,202

 61,534

 61,746

 61,809

 61,684

 61,414

 63,622

 63,567

 63,628

 63,616

 63,652

 63,707

 63,786

 64,005

 63,956

 63,895

 63,834

 63,725

 63,646

 63,536

 63,469

 63,159

 62,868

 62,542

 62,439

 62,427

 62,373

 62,373

 62,373

 62,161

 62,234

 62,131

 62,083

 62,155

 62,409

 62,735

STORAGE - A.F. 

 111,131

 112,220

 113,365

 114,603

 115,826

 116,755

 117,641

 118,568

 119,527

 120,385

 121,030

 121,520

 121,933

 122,185

 122,367

 122,520

 122,656

 122,776

 122,871

 122,920

 122,953

 123,003

 123,003

 123,147

 123,436

 123,665

 123,829

 123,964

 124,093

 124,149

657

701

502

578

688

675

760

610

486

438

509

452

446

489

557

426

441

455

155

170

474

542

461

636

713

587

-1,488

617

633

548

1,135

1,250

1,079

1,202

1,305

1,143

1,207

1,077

969

871

834

699

654

616

649

503

510

515

203

195

491

567

461

709

859

702

-1,405

685

698

576

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

JUNE 2013 FULL NATURAL FLOW AT NEW MELONES DAM RUN DATE: 07/26/2013

TOTALS +13,967 20,959

* October 1, 41,572

 462.1

 464.6

 466.7

 469.1

 471.7

 473.9

 476.3

 478.5

 480.4

 482.1

 483.8

 485.2

 486.5

 487.7

 489.0

 490.0

 491.0

 492.0

 492.4

 492.8

 493.8

 494.9

 495.8

 497.2

 498.9

 500.3

 497.5

 498.9

 500.3

 501.4

DONNELLS

RES

BEARDSLEY

RES

2012 TO DATE

NEW

MELONES

INFLOW

C.F.S

NATURAL

RIVER

C.F.S

ACCUM *

FULL

NATURAL

1000 A.F.

RESERVOIR

TOTAL

+949

+1,089

+1,145

+1,238

+1,223

+929

+886

+927

+959

+858

+645

+490

+413

+252

+182

+153

+136

+120

+95

+49

+33

+50

+0

+144

+289

+229

+164

+135

+129

+56

CHANGE

A.F. C.F.S.

+478

+549

+577

+624

+617

+468

+447

+467

+483

+433

+325

+247

+208

+127

+92

+77

+69

+60

+48

+25

+17

+25

+0

+73

+146

+115

+83

+68

+65

+28
<PAGE>




                                                                 EXHIBIT 22.1


                        IMPCO TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
                       SUBSIDIARIES OF THE COMPANY


Name                                            Jurisdiction of Incorporation
-------                                         ------------------------------

Fuel Injection Centers
   of America, Inc.                                  Washington

Canadian AirSensors, Inc.                            British Columbia, Canada

IMPCO Technologies, B.V.                             Holland

IMPCO Europe, B.V.                                   Holland

IMPCO Technologies, Pty.                             Australia

Grupo I.M.P.C.O. Mexicano,
    S. de R.L. de C.V.                               Mexico

IMPCO de Venezuela S. de R.L.                        Venezuela

IMPCO Tech Japan K.K.                                Japan
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY ELEV

 1,901.62

 1,901.35

 1,901.47

 1,901.69

 1,901.78

 1,901.58

 1,901.51

 1,901.67

 1,901.40

 1,901.27

 1,901.46

 1,901.11

 1,901.06

 1,901.42

 1,901.30

 1,901.30

 1,901.77

 1,901.72

 1,901.34

 1,901.30

 1,901.01

 1,900.76

 1,900.71

 1,901.00

 1,900.75

 1,901.04

 1,900.87

 1,900.72

 1,900.87

 1,900.84

 1,900.89

 14,375

 14,173

 14,263

 14,427

 14,494

 14,345

 14,292

 14,412

 14,210

 14,113

 14,255

 13,993

 13,956

 14,225

 14,135

 14,135

 14,487

 14,450

 14,165

 14,135

 13,918

 13,734

 13,698

 13,911

 13,727

 13,941

 13,815

 13,705

 13,815

 13,793

 13,830

STORAGE

+68

-202

+90

+164

+67

-149

-53

+120

-202

-97

+142

-262

-37

+269

-90

+0

+352

-37

-285

-30

-217

-184

-36

+213

-184

+214

-126

-110

+110

-22

+37

CHANGE

2,043

1,917

2,023

2,048

1,293

1,165

1,097

1,689

1,580

1,443

1,570

564

1,061

973

1,094

1,101

1,569

301

176

311

493

504

578

435

503

435

532

538

380

583

347

INFLOW

 80

 80

 80

 80

 80

 80

 80

 80

 80

 80

 80

 80

 80

 80

 80

 80

 80

 80

 80

 80

 80

 80

 80

 80

 80

 80

 80

 80

 80

 80

 80

POWER

 180

 183

 183

 185

 177

 166

 134

 132

 134

 135

 134

 140

 146

 136

 141

 143

 143

 143

 143

 150

 147

 152

 150

 151

 151

 150

 151

 148

 148

 149

 151

SPILL

 80

 80

 80

 80

 80

 80

 80

 80

 80

 80

 80

 80

 80

 80

 80

 80

 80

 80

 80

 80

 80

 80

 80

 80

 80

 80

 80

 80

 80

 80

 80

OUTLETS

 1

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 3

 0

 0

 0

 0

 1

 0

 0

 1

 1

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

C.F.S.

 .03

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .12

 .02

 .01

 .00

 .01

 .03

 .00

 .01

 .03

 .03

 .00

 .01

 .01

 .01

 .01

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .01

 .00

 .01

 .00

 .01

INCHES

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

DECEMBER 2011 LEWISTON LAKE DAILY OPERATIONS RUN DATE: January 3, 2012

IN LAKE

EVAPORATION

C.F.S. FRANCIS CARR

COMPUTED*

ACRE-FEET

RELEASE - C.F.S. 

TOTALS -477 30,346 2,480 2,480 4,676 7 .36

ACRE-FEET -477 60,191 4,919 4,919 9,275 14

* COMPUTED INFLOW IS THE SUM OF CHANGE IN STORAGE, RELEASES AND EVAPORATION.

(1) OUTLET RELEASE INCLUDES THE CONTINUOUS FISH RELEASE OF 75 C.F.S.

(2) INCHES OF EVAPORATION TAKEN FROM PAN AT TRINITY RIVER HATCHERY

SUMMARY

RELEASE (ACRE-FEET)

TOTAL POWER 4,919

TOTAL RIVER 19,113 60,689

 14,307

 41,576

RIVER

JUDGE FRANCIS CARR POWERPLANT

TOTAL RELEASE

JUDGE (2)

(1) POWERPLANT

 1,668

 1,676

 1,635

 1,620

 922

 914

 827

 1,353

 1,388

 1,197

 1,204

 395

 774

 541

 837

 797

 1,089

 17

 17

 16

 295

 285

 286

 17

 285

 17

 285

 285

 17

 285

 17

 20,961

 41,576
§ 5.28 Formulas, samples, and documentation. ( a ) In addition to any formula specifically required under subpart J of this part, TTB may require formulas under certain circumstances in connection with the label approval process. Prior to or in conjunction with the review of an application for a certificate of label approval (COLA) on TTB Form 5100.31, the appropriate TTB officer may require a bottler or importer to submit a formula, the results of laboratory testing of the distilled spirits, or a sample of any distilled spirits or ingredients used in producing a distilled spirit. After the issuance of a COLA, or with regard to any distilled spirits required to be covered by a COLA, the appropriate TTB officer may require a full and accurate statement of the contents of the container.
( b ) A formula may be filed electronically by using Formulas Online, or it may be submitted on paper on TTB Form 5100.51. See § 5.11 for more information on forms and Formulas Online.
###### Editorial Note on [Part 41](/current/title-27/part-41?toc=1)

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 41 (formerly part 275) appear at T.D. ATF-460, [66 FR 39093](https://www.federalregister.gov/citation/66-FR-39093), July 27, 2001.

#### § 41.121 Amount and account of bond.

(a) *Bond amount.* Except for the maximum and minimum amounts stated in this paragraph, the total amount of the bond or bonds required under this subpart must be in an amount not less than the amount of unpaid tax chargeable at any one time against the bond or bonds. The maximum and minimum amounts of such bond or bonds are as follows:

| Taxable article | Bond amount maximum (in dollars) | Bond amount minimum (in dollars) |
| --- | --- | --- |
| (1) Cigarettes | 250,000 | 1,000 |
| (2) Any combination of taxable articles | 250,000 | 1,000 |
| (3) One kind of taxable article other than cigarettes | 150,000 | 1,000 |

(b) *Bond account.* Where the amount of a bonded manufacturer's bond is less than the maximum amount prescribed in [paragraph (a)](/on/2024-08-30/title-27/section-41.121#p-41.121(a)) of this section, the bonded manufacturer must maintain an account reflecting all outstanding taxes for which the manufacturer's bond is chargeable. A manufacturer must debit that account with the amount of tax that was agreed to be paid under [§ 41.111](/on/2024-08-30/title-27/section-41.111) or that is otherwise chargeable against the bond and then must credit the account for the amount paid on TTB F 5000.25 or other TTB-prescribed document, at the time it is filed. A manufacturer who will defer payment of tax for a shipment of tobacco products or cigarette papers or tubes under this subpart must have sufficient credit in this account to cover the taxes prior to making the shipment to the United States.

(Approved by the Office of Management and Budget under control number 1513-0108)

[T.D. ATF-444, [73 FR 16757](https://www.federalregister.gov/citation/73-FR-16757), Mar. 31, 2008]
#### Coe Wells, Respondent, *v.*William H. Ross, Appellant.

(Argued December 19, 1877;

decided January 15, 1878.)

Decided upon the facts in the case.

*Edward K. Clark*for appellant.

*O. W. Chapman*for respondent.

Allen, J.,

reads for affirmance.

All concur.

Judgment affirmed.