alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
A-AA+Skip to content

                  - Home
                  - Compendium Statistics
                  - Event
                  - Archives
                  - Glossary
                  - Help
                  - Contact
                  - Research on Disability

Annual Disability Statistics Compendium

              - Home /
              - Archives /
              - 2012 Compendium Statistics /
              - 2012 Social Security Administration Programs /
              - 2012 9.6 Social Security Disability Insurance—Number of Beneficiaries by Disability Type

## Table 9.6: Social Security Disability Insurance—Total Annual Benefits (in thousands of dollars): December 2010

----

----

 

----

#### 2012 Disability Compendium

                        - Home
                        - Compendium Statistics                           - Population and Prevelance
                          - Employment
                          - Time Trend Population Statistics
                          - Poverty
                          - Earnings
                          - Veterans
                          - Health Insurance Coverage
                          - Health
                          - Social Security Administration Programs
                          - Medicaid and Medicare
                          - Special Education
                          - Vocational Rehabilitation
                          - Federal Government Spending and Employment
                          - International Disability Statistics
                          - Population Statistics: Disability Type
                        - Event
                        - Archives                           - 2012 Compendium Statistics
                        - Glossary
                        - Help
                        - Contact
                        - Research on Disability

#### Funding for this project is made possible by:

 The Research and Training Center on Disability Statistics and Demographics (StatsRRTC), which is funded by the U.S. Department of Education, National Institute for Disability and Rehabilitation Research, under cooperative agreements H133B080012.

#### Stay Connected

**Institute on Disability**10 West Edge Drive, Suite 101Durham, NH 03824603.862.4320 | relay: 711 | [email protected]www.iod.unh.edu

© 2013. Institute on Disability.University of New Hampshire.
PUBLIC LAW 113–180—SEPT. 26, 2014 128 STAT. 1915 

LEGISLATIVE HISTORY—S. 2154: 

CONGRESSIONAL RECORD, Vol. 160 (2014): 

Sept. 10, considered and passed Senate. 

Sept. 15, 16, considered and passed House. 

Æ 

Public Law 113–180 

113th Congress 

An Act 

To amend the Public Health Service Act to reauthorize the Emergency Medical 

Services for Children Program. 

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of 

the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Emergency Medical Services 

for Children Reauthorization Act of 2014’’. 

SEC. 2. AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS. 

Section 1910(d) of the Public Health Service Act (42 U.S.C. 

300w–9(d)) is amended— 

(1) by striking ‘‘and $30,387,656’’ and inserting 

‘‘$30,387,656’’; and 

(2) by inserting before the period ‘‘, and $20,213,000 for 

each of fiscal years 2015 through 2019’’. 

Approved September 26, 2014. 

42 USC 201 note. 

Emergency 

Medical Services 

for Children 

Reauthorization 

Act of 2014. 

Sept. 26, 2014 

[S. 2154] 


srobinson on DSKB307YQ1PROD with PUBLIC LAWS
Editorial Note on Part 70
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 70 appear by T.D. ATF-450, 66 FR 29022-29030, May 29, 2001.

§ 70.412 Excise taxes. ( a ) *Collection.* Taxes on distilled spirits, wines, and beer are paid by returns. Depending on the circumstances, the person responsible for paying the taxes may be eligible to file semimonthly, quarterly, or annual returns, with proper remittances, to cover the taxes incurred on distilled spirits, wines, and beer during the semimonthly, quarterly, or annual period. Payment must accompany the return unless required to be made by electronic fund transfer (EFT). If the taxpayer is not qualified to defer taxpayment, or has been placed on a prepayment basis, the taxpayer must prepay the tax on the distilled spirits, wines, or beer. Distilled spirits, wines, and beer tax returns are filed in accordance with the instruction on the return forms, which are furnished to industry members by TTB. Detailed information respecting the payment of tax on liquors, including the forms to be used and procedures to be followed, is contained in the respective regulations described in § 70.411(c).
( b ) *Assessment.* If additional or delinquent tax liability is disclosed by an investigation, or by an examination of records, of a qualified plant or permittee, a notice (except where delay may jeopardize collection of the tax, or where the amount involved is nominal or the result of an evident mathematical error) is sent to the taxpayer advising of the basis and amount of the liability and affording the taxpayer an opportunity to submit a protest, with supporting facts, or to request a conference.
[T.D. ATF-251, 52 FR 19325, May 22, 1987, as amended by T.D. ATF-271, 53 FR 17549, May 17, 1988. Redesignated and amended by T.D. ATF-301, 55 FR 47606, 47653, Nov. 14, 1990; T.D. ATF-450, 66 FR 29028, May 29, 2001; T.D. TTB-41, 71 FR 5605, Feb. 2, 2006; T.D. TTB-79, 74 FR 37424, July 28, 2009; T.D. TTB-89, 76 FR 3515, Jan. 20, 2011; T.D. TTB-159, 85 FR 33542, June 2, 2020]
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee v. Juan SOLIS-CAMPOS, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 05-50111.

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.

Decided Feb. 24, 2006.

Joseph H. Gay, Jr., Assistant U.S. Attorney, U.S. Attorney’s , Office Western District of Texas, San Antonio, TX, for Plaintiff-Appellee.

Judy Fulmer Madewell, Federal Public Defender’s Office Western District of Texas, San Antonio, TX, for Defendant-Appellant.

Before KING, WIENER and DeMOSS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: *

IT IS ORDERED that Appellee’s unopposed motion to vacate sentence is GRANTED.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Appellee’s unopposed motion to remand case to district court for resentencing is GRANTED.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Appellee’s unopposed alternative motion to extend time to file Appellee’s brief fourteen (14) days from the court’s denial of Appellee’s motion to vacate and remand is DENIED as moot.

*

 Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the Court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY ELEV

 1,051.81

 1,051.82

 1,051.86

 1,051.86

 1,051.89

 1,051.94

 1,052.00

 1,052.10

 1,052.34

 1,052.51

 1,052.45

 1,052.51

 1,052.46

 1,052.50

 1,052.36

 1,052.26

 1,052.17

 1,052.15

 1,052.10

 1,052.02

 1,051.97

 1,051.94

 1,051.88

 1,051.83

 1,051.78

 1,051.78

 1,051.82

 1,051.78

 1,051.70

 1,051.62

 1,051.58

 1,994.9

 1,995.0

 1,995.5

 1,995.5

 1,995.8

 1,996.4

 1,997.0

 1,998.1

 2,000.8

 2,002.7

 2,002.0

 2,002.7

 2,002.1

 2,002.6

 2,001.0

 1,999.9

 1,998.9

 1,998.7

 1,998.1

 1,997.2

 1,996.7

 1,996.4

 1,995.7

 1,995.2

 1,994.6

 1,994.6

 1,995.0

 1,994.6

 1,993.7

 1,992.8

 1,992.4

STORAGE

+0.4

+0.1

+0.4

+0.0

+0.3

+0.6

+0.7

+1.1

+2.7

+1.9

-0.7

+0.7

-0.6

+0.4

-1.6

-1.1

-1.0

-0.2

-0.6

-0.9

-0.6

-0.3

-0.7

-0.6

-0.6

+0.0

+0.4

-0.4

-0.9

-0.9

-0.4

CHANGE

803

718

884

662

825

798

854

1,060

1,357

1,283

926

1,233

1,095

672

528

764

805

644

762

893

1,020

981

853

841

858

1,027

1,580

814

918

864

902

INFLOW

 213

 23

 23

 23

 23

 23

 23

 20

 10

 153

 1,024

 891

 1,331

 1

 10

 12

 12

 373

 1,041

 1,315

 1,284

 1,119

 1,173

 1,115

 1,125

 1,009

 1,328

 1,016

 1,349

 1,298

 1,103

POWER

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

SPILL

 354

 610

 610

 610

 610

 472

 472

 453

 0

 170

 208

 0

 0

 430

 1,296

 1,296

 1,296

 382

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

OUTLET

 14

 29

 29

 29

 25

 25

 25

 29

 7

 11

 29

 7

 43

 18

 4

 14

 0

 0

 0

 25

 14

 29

 14

 4

 11

 18

 29

 21

 14

 11

 21

C.F.S.

 .04

 .08

 .08

 .08

 .07

 .07

 .07

 .08

 .02

 .03

 .08

 .02

 .12

 .05

 .01

 .04

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .07

 .04

 .08

 .04

 .01

 .03

 .05

 .08

 .06

 .04

 .03

 .06

INCHES

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .68

 1.03

 .21

 .34

 .30

 .00

 .02

 .05

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .61

 .01

 .00

 .00

 .00

 1.08

 .22

 .00

 .00

 .00

PRECIP

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

DECEMBER 2006 NEW MELONES LAKE DAILY OPERATIONS RUN DATE: April 11, 2007

IN LAKE

EVAPORATION

INCHES

C.F.S.

COMPUTED*

1000 ACRE-FEET

RELEASE - C.F.S.

TOTALS -2.4 28,224 19,463 0 9,269 549 1.53 4.55

ACRE-FEET -2,400 55,982 38,605 0 18,385 1,089

COMMENTS:

SUMMARY

RELEASE (ACRE-FEET)

POWER 38,605

SPILL 0

OUTLET

TOTAL

 18,385

 56,990

PRECIPITATION

THIS MONTH =

TO DATE =

 4.55

JULY 1, 2006 6.92

 1,994.5

Table 13
Faulk, Scott (OST)

From: Sent: To: Cc: Subject:

To scott.faulk donna tangonan <molokai_tango@yahoo.com> Tuesday, January 28, 2014 10:15 PM Faulk, Scott (OST) molokai_tango@yahoo.com Mokulele service to Kaluapapa

Dear Department ofTransportation (DOT) t i

•..i**~J**

I am writing to support Mokulele Airlines year bid link to Kalaupapa to Kahului,Honolulu,Kapalua,Ho'olehua. Mokulele is one ofthe best airline that ifly inter island theywill be the best candidate as they have lowers fares experienced agents/ramper, frequent flight, multiple islands and ease ofbooking via Global Distribution system (expedia,travellocity,orbitz,priceline)lts is very importantwe have safe,stable & affordable service to Kalaupapa.l'm born and raise on the island and would love more then to see Mokulele Airlines get a chance to prove to our communitythatfares will be lowerfortravel for personal use doctorvisit family vacation ect..

.... I never seen a airline so commited to the island state wide to try to provide for every day needs Iwork for county of maui public works. I will bet you this will be the best service thatyou will elect forthis newyear in to Kaluapapa. Mokulele currently transfers our county officials and stafffor meeting and other event to and from molokai. We are familiar with there great service and value to the residents of Maui and especially Molokai. Please select Mokulele Airlines to serve Kalaupapa for the next years to come. Sincerly, Perry Tangonan, molokai tango@yahoo.com

1
### Part B—Flexibility in the Use of Administrative and Other Funds
### §205. Codes and Supplement; where printed; form and style; ancillaries

The publications provided for in sections 202, 203 of this title shall be printed at the Government Publishing Office and shall be in such form and style and with such ancillaries as may be prescribed by the Committee on the Judiciary of the House of Representatives. The Librarian of Congress is directed to cooperate with such committee in the preparation of such ancillaries. Such publications shall be furnished with such thumb insets and other devices to distinguish parts, with such facilities for the insertion of additional matter, and with such explanatory and advertising slips, and shall be printed on such paper and bound in such material, as may be prescribed by such committee.

(July 30, 1947, ch. 388, 61 Stat. 639; Pub. L. 113–235, div. H, title I, §1301(b), Dec. 16, 2014, 128 Stat. 2537.)

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Change of Name

"Government Publishing Office" substituted for "Government Printing Office" in text on authority of section 1301(b) of Pub. L. 113–235, set out as a note preceding section 301 of Title 44, Public Printing and Documents.
### §7931. Sense of Congress on early learning and child care

It is the Sense of the Congress that a State retains the right to make decisions, free from Federal intrusion, concerning its system of early learning and child care, and whether or not to use funding under this chapter to offer early childhood education programs. Such systems should continue to include robust choice for parents through a mixed delivery system of services so parents can determine the right early learning and child care option for their children. States, while protecting the rights of early learning and child care providers, retain the right to make decisions that shall include the age at which to set compulsory attendance in school, the content of a State's early learning guidelines, and how to determine quality in programs.

(Pub. L. 89–10, title VIII, §8549B, as added Pub. L. 114–95, title VIII, §8041, Dec. 10, 2015, 129 Stat. 2122.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Prior Provisions

A prior section 7931, Pub. L. 89–10, title IX, §9301, as added Pub. L. 103–382, title I, §101, Oct. 20, 1994, 108 Stat. 3805, set forth short title of the Alaska Native Educational Equity, Support and Assistance Act, prior to the general amendment of former subchapter IX of this chapter by Pub. L. 107–110.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date

Section effective Dec. 10, 2015, except with respect to certain noncompetitive programs and competitive programs, see section 5 of Pub. L. 114–95, set out as an Effective Date of 2015 Amendment note under section 6301 of this title.
**Exhibit 23.1**

**Consent of Independent Registered PublicAccounting Firm**

We consent to theincorporation by reference in the following Registration Statements of Staples,Inc. and in the related Prospectus of our reports dated February 27, 2007, withrespect to the consolidated financial statements and schedule of Staples, Inc.,Staples, Inc.’s management’s assessment of the effectiveness of internalcontrol over financial reporting, and the effectiveness of internal controlover financial reporting of Staples, Inc., included in this Annual Report (Form10-K) for the year ended February 3, 2007.
| (1) | Registration Statement (Forms S-3  Nos. 333-58743, 333-62939, 333-81503, 333-76360, and 333-124024) of  Staples, Inc., and                                                                                                                                      |
|-----|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| (2) | Registration Statement (Forms S-8  Nos. 333-36713, 333-36715, 333-39991, 333-39993, 333-64545, 333-73383,  333-87971, 333-12903, 333-68428, 333-68430, 333-68432, 333-116644, and  333-128449) pertaining to the employees’ benefit plans of Staples, Inc. |

 

/s/ Ernst &Young LLP

Boston, MassachusettsFebruary 27, 2007

----
### §195. Gifts, bequests, or devises for benefit of National Arboretum; separate fund in the Treasury

Notwithstanding any other provision of law, the Secretary of Agriculture is authorized to solicit, accept, receive, hold, utilize, and administer on behalf of the United States gifts, bequests, or devises of real and personal property made for the benefit of the National Arboretum or for the carrying out of any of its functions. For the purposes of the Federal income, estate, and gift tax laws, property accepted under the authority of this section shall be considered as a gift, bequest, or devise to the United States. Any gift of money accepted pursuant to the authority granted in this section, or the net proceeds from the liquidation of any property so accepted, or the proceeds of any insurance on any gift property not used for its restoration shall be deposited in the Treasury of the United States for credit to a separate fund and shall be disbursed upon order of the Secretary of Agriculture.

(Mar. 4, 1927, ch. 505, §5, as added Pub. L. 94–129, Nov. 13, 1975, 89 Stat. 683; amended Pub. L. 104–127, title VIII, §890(a), Apr. 4, 1996, 110 Stat. 1181.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

1996—Pub. L. 104–127 inserted "solicit," after "authorized to" in first sentence.
# Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

May 1, 2017

No. 04

- 16

- 00636

- CV

Kevin W. LILES , Bryan K. Harris, Stuart R. White, James L. Ray and Kyle D. Giacco (Cross

Appellees)

, Appellants

v.

Maria Isabel Serna CONTRERAS as next friend and guardian of Samara Isabella Morales Serna

and Samantha Isabel Morales Serna, Minor Children (Cross

- Appellant),

Appellees

From the 341st Judicial District Court, Webb County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2014CVT001295 D3

Honorable Rebecca Ramirez Palomo, Judge Presiding



### O R D E R

The joint motion to consolidate and extend appellees ’ brief deadlines are hereby

GRANTED. Time is extended to May 22, 2017.

__________ _______________________ Rebeca C. Martinez, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said

court on this 1st day of May, 2017

.

__________ _________________________ Keith E. Hottle

Clerk of Court
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 11-6010

ABDUS-SABUR IBN QUEEN, a/k/a Samuel R. Queen, Jr.,

Petitioner - Appellant,

v.

JAMES N. CROSS,

Respondent - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern 

District of West Virginia, at Elkins. John Preston Bailey, 

Chief District Judge. (2:09-cv-00095-JPB-DJJ)

Submitted: May 19, 2011 Decided: May 23, 2011

Before TRAXLER, Chief Judge, and AGEE and KEENAN, Circuit 

Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Abdus-Sabur Ibn Queen, Appellant Pro Se. Helen Campbell 

Altmeyer, Assistant United States Attorney, Wheeling, West 

Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Abdus-Sabur Ibn Queen, a federal prisoner, appeals the 

district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the 

magistrate judge and denying relief on his 28 U.S.C.A. § 2241 

(West 2006 & Supp. 2010) petition. We have reviewed the record 

and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the 

reasons stated by the district court. Queen v. Cross, No. 2:09-

cv-00095-JPB-DJJ (N.D.W. Va. May 26, 2010). We dispense with 

oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are 

adequately presented in the materials before the court and 

argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
#### McFarland *vs.*Gilchrist and others.

1. A mortgage given by a husband and wife, in trust for the wife, to secure io her money alleged to have been loaned by her to her husband out of her separate estate, held to be a lien on the mortgaged premises, in the hands of an assignee for value, subsequent to a junior mortgage by the same parties.

2. The assignee, in such case, has no higher equity against the junior mortgagee, than the trustee and her *cestui que trust.*

*488
      *Mr. A. T. McGill,*for complainant.

*Mr. Fleming,*for defendant, Walker.

The Vice-Chance leok.

John A. Faulkner and Jesse his wife, made their mortgage of August 20th, 1870, for $3100, to Mary Dixon, in trust for the said Jesse. They allege it to have been given to secure to the latter moneys lent by her to her husband, several years before, out of her separate estate. It M'as put on record August 31st, 1870. On the 20th of September, 1870, they made another mortgage to Peter Walker, for $3200, which was put on record September 23d, 1870.

By an assignment of July 20th, 1871, Mary Dixon transferred the mortgage given to her to William W. McFarland (Faulkner and wife consenting thereto) to secure the sum of $2500. The bill of McFarland, the complainant, is to foreclose this mortgage. Peter Walker, in his answer and cross-bill, attacks the mortgage to Mary Dixon as voluntary, without consideration, and -void as to creditors.

The only doubt I have had as to what decree should be made in the case, has been upon the question whether, under the circumstances disclosed by the evidence, McFarland stood upon better ground, in. respect to Walker’s mortgage, than Mrs. Dixon, or her *cestui que trust.*I am clear that he does not. The rule that a mortgage is taken by an assignee, subject to all equities against the assignor, is applicable in this case. Under the evidence, the mortgage given to secure Mrs. Faulkner, cannot be held to be good in Mrs. Dixon’s hands, against the mortgage of Walker. The latter mortgage is a prior lien. Her mortgage was assigned to McFarland to secure a debt due him from her husband, and the assignment gives McFarland no higher equity, as against Walker, than the equity of Mrs. Dixon and her *cestui que trust.*

I will advise accordingly.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                           JUL-3-1999
<PERIOD-END>                                JUL-3-1999
<CASH>                                          55,503
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                               12,885,571
<ALLOWANCES>                                  (48,000)
<INVENTORY>                                  5,502,052
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            18,773,310
<PP&E>                                      14,962,620
<DEPRECIATION>                               5,731,885
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              32,775,186
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        8,301,042
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        42,506
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                32,775,186
<SALES>                                     65,637,040
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            65,637,040
<CGS>                                       53,655,356
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               60,795,091
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             571,701
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              4,182,030
<INCOME-TAX>                                 1,634,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 2,548,030
<EPS-BASIC>                                        .72
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .71


</TABLE>
(No. 73-CC-427

#### Catholic Charities of the Archdiocese of Chicago, Claimant, *vs.*State of Illinois, Department of Children and Family Services, Respondent.

*Opinion filed September 5, 1973.*

Catholic Charities of the Archdiocese of Chicago, Claimant, pro se.

William J. Scott, Attorney General; Saul R. Wexler, Assistant Attorney General, for Respondent.

Per Curiam.