alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
(No. 74-CC-404

#### Atlas Van Lines, Inc., Claimant, *vs.*State of Illinois, Department of Mental Health, Respondent.

*Opinion filed April 18, 1974.*

Atlas Van Lines, Inc., Claimant, pro se.

William J. Scott, Attorney General; Howard W. Feldman, Assistant Attorney General, for Respondent.

Per Curiam.
#### § 771.61 Notice of hearing.

Once a request for a hearing has been referred to the administrative law judge, the administrative law judge shall set a time and place for a hearing and shall serve notice thereof upon the parties at least 10 days in advance of the hearing date.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

DAY

 47,786

 48,554

 49,376

 50,164

 50,852

 51,356

 51,741

 52,123

 52,456

 52,714

 52,926

 52,977

 52,914

 53,111

 53,315

 53,508

 53,650

 53,776

 53,899

 53,998

 54,112

 54,246

 54,409

 54,587

 54,857

 55,008

 55,052

 55,072

 55,092

 55,136

 51,561

 51,608

 51,646

 51,753

 51,821

 51,883

 52,048

 52,178

 52,206

 52,240

 52,274

 52,564

 52,791

 52,854

 52,940

 52,940

 52,985

 53,019

 53,059

 53,088

 53,088

 53,076

 52,985

 52,900

 52,820

 52,797

 52,860

 52,917

 53,008

 53,014

STORAGE - A.F. 

 99,347

 100,162

 101,022

 101,917

 102,673

 103,239

 103,789

 104,301

 104,662

 104,954

 105,200

 105,541

 105,705

 105,965

 106,255

 106,448

 106,635

 106,795

 106,958

 107,086

 107,200

 107,322

 107,394

 107,487

 107,677

 107,805

 107,912

 107,989

 108,100

 108,150

563

482

571

303

245

458

334

286

370

233

417

506

350

251

443

395

409

428

145

415

343

371

427

341

443

477

328

454

436

400

965

893

1,005

754

626

743

611

544

552

380

541

678

433

382

589

492

503

509

227

480

400

433

463

388

539

542

382

493

492

425

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

JUNE 2021 FULL NATURAL FLOW AT NEW MELONES DAM RUN DATE: 07/28/2021

TOTALS +9,600 16,464

* October 1,

32,656

 278.7

 280.5

 282.5

 284.0

 285.2

 286.7

 287.9

 289.0

 290.1

 290.8

 291.9

 293.2

 294.1

 294.9

 296.0

 297.0

 298.0

 299.0

 299.5

 300.4

 301.2

 302.1

 303.0

 303.7

 304.8

 305.9

 306.7

 307.6

 308.6

 309.4

DONNELLS

RES

BEARDSLEY

RES

2020 TO DATE

NEW

MELONES

INFLOW

C.F.S

NATURAL

RIVER

C.F.S

ACCUM *

FULL

NATURAL

1000 A.F.

RESERVOIR

TOTAL

+797

+815

+860

+895

+756

+566

+550

+512

+361

+292

+246

+341

+164

+260

+290

+193

+187

+160

+163

+128

+114

+122

+72

+93

+190

+128

+107

+77

+111

+50

CHANGE

A.F. C.F.S.

+402

+411

+434

+451

+381

+285

+277

+258

+182

+147

+124

+172

+83

+131

+146

+97

+94

+81

+82

+65

+57

+62

+36

+47

+96

+65

+54

+39

+56

+25

ACRE-FEET
(No. 74-CC-195

#### American Petrofina Company of Texas, Claimant, *vs.*State of Illinois, Department of Conservation, Respondent.

*Opinion filed January 8, 1974.*

American Petrofina Company of Texas, Claimant, pro se.

William J. Scott, Attorney General; William E. Webber, Assistant Attorney General, for Respondent.

Per Curiam.
(No. 6770

#### The Field and Shorb Company, Claimant, *vs.*State of Illinois, Department of Transportation, Respondent.

*Opinion filed November 14, 1972.*

The Field and Shorb Company, Claimant, pro se.

William J. Scott, Attorney General; William E. Webber, Assistant Attorney General, for Respondent.

Per Curiam.
#### § 771.39 Authority of Director of Industry Operations to proceed with revocation or denial action.

Where the evidence is conclusive and the nature of the violation is such as to preclude any settlement, the violation is of a continuing character that necessitates immediate action to protect the public interest, or the Director of Industry Operations believes that any informal settlement of the alleged violation will not ensure future compliance with applicable laws and regulations in this part, or in any similar case where the circumstances are such as to clearly preclude informal settlement, and the Director of Industry Operations so finds and states the reasons therefor in the notice, the Director of Industry Operations may proceed with the revocation or denial of renewal.
### §§1941 to 1944. Repealed. Pub. L. 95–561, title XV, §1529, Nov. 1, 1978, 92 Stat. 2380

Section 1941, Pub. L. 93–380, title VII, §711, Aug. 21, 1974, 88 Stat. 591, set forth provisions respecting statement of purpose for State reading improvement programs.

Section 1942, Pub. L. 93–380, title VII, §712, Aug. 21, 1974, 88 Stat. 591, set forth applicability and effective date of provisions respecting State reading improvement programs.

Section 1943, Pub. L. 93–380, title VII, §713, Aug. 21, 1974, 88 Stat. 591, set forth requirements for allotments and reallotments for States.

Section 1944, Pub. L. 93–380, title VII, §714, Aug. 21, 1974, 88 Stat. 592; Pub. L. 94–194, §4, Dec. 31, 1975, 89 Stat. 1104, set forth provisions respecting requirements for grants for State reading improvement programs.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date of Repeal

Repeal effective Oct. 1, 1978, see section 1530(a) of Pub. L. 95–561, set out as an Effective Date of 1978 Amendment note under section 1221e–3 of this title.
bdco9kex1011062615.htm


Ex. 10.11


 



GUARANTY FEE AGREEMENT


 


THIS GUARANTY FEE AGREEMENT (the “Agreement”) is made as of June 22, 2015 (the “Effective Date”), by and between Jonathan P. Carroll (“Guarantor”) and Lazarus Energy, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company (“LE”).  Guarantor and LE are sometimes referred to herein as the "Parties".







WHEREAS, LE entered into a Loan Agreement (as amended, restated, supplemented or otherwise modified from time to time, the “Loan Agreement”) dated June 22, 2015, with Sovereign Bank (“Lender”) as evidenced by that certain Promissory Note (the “Note”) of even date with the Loan Agreement, in the original principal sum of TWENTY-FIVE MILLION AND 00/100 DOLLARS ($25,000,000.00); and







WHEREAS, as a condition precedent to Lender’s obligations to extend credit to LE under the Loan Agreement, Lender required the execution and delivery of an unconditional guaranty as security for the obligations of LE under the Loan Agreement and Note; and








WHEREAS, Guarantor entered into a United States Department of Agriculture Rural Development Unconditional Guarantee, Business and Industry Guaranteed Loan Program (as amended, restated, supplemented or otherwise modified from time to time, the “Guaranty”) of even date with the Loan Agreement and Note in favor of Lender to secure LE’s obligations under the Loan Agreement and Note.




 


NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the Guaranty and for other good and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which are hereby acknowledged by LE, the Parties agree as follows:


 


1.             Payment of Fee.  LE shall pay Guarantor or assignee a fee in an amount equal to two percent (2.00%) per annum, paid monthly, of the outstanding principal balance owed under the Loan Agreement (the “Guaranty Fee”).  Amounts payable to Guarantor as the Guaranty Fee shall be paid at the end of each calendar month.


 


2.             Governing Law.  This Agreement shall be governed and construed in accordance with the laws of the State of Texas without reference to any conflict of law provision.


 


3.             Counterparts.  This Agreement may be executed in multiple counterparts, including counterparts transmitted by facsimile, each of which will be deemed an original, but both of which together will constitute one and the same instrument.

















[Remainder of page intentionally left blank; signature page to follow.]


 


 


 


 




  





  











  






 







 


IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Parties have executed this Agreement as of the Effective Date.












                                                                         













	 	LAZARUS ENERGY, LLC  	 	 	JONATHAN P. CARROLL 
	 	 	 	 	 
	
By:

	
/s/ TOMMY L. BYRD

	  	
By:

	
/s/ JONATHAN P. CARROLL


	  	
Tommy L. Byrd


 

	  	  	
Jonathan P. Carroll
114TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 3779 

AN ACT 

To restrict the inclusion of social security account numbers 

on documents sent by mail by the Federal Government, 

and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 
2 

•HR 3779 EH

1 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

2 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Social Security Fraud 

3 Prevention Act of 2016’’. 

4 SEC. 2. RESTRICTION OF SSNS ON DOCUMENTS SENT BY 

5 MAIL. 

6 (a) IN GENERAL.—No department or agency of the 

7 Federal Government may include the Social Security ac8 count number of any individual on any document sent by 

9 mail unless the head of such department or agency deter10 mines that the inclusion of such Social Security number 

11 on such document is necessary. 

12 (b) REGULATIONS.—Not later than 1 year after the 

13 date of the enactment of this Act, the head of each depart14 ment and agency of the Federal Government shall issue 

15 regulations specifying the circumstances under which in16 clusion of a Social Security account number on a docu17 ment sent by mail is necessary. Such regulations shall in18 clude— 

19 (1) instructions for the partial redaction of So20 cial Security account numbers whenever feasible; 

21 and 

22 (2) a requirement that Social Security account 

23 numbers not be visible on the outside of any package 

24 sent by mail. 
3 

•HR 3779 EH

1 (c) EFFECTIVE DATE.—This Act shall apply with re2 spect to documents sent by mail on or after the date that 

3 is 1 year after the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Passed the House of Representatives September 26, 

2016. 

Attest: 

Clerk. 
114TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 3779 

AN ACT 

To restrict the inclusion of social security account 

eral Government, and for other purposes. numbers on documents sent by mail by the Fed-
July 25, 2012 

Dennis J. DeVany 

Chief Essential Air Service Division 

US Dept. of Transportation 

1200 New Jersey Ave. SE 

Washington, D.C. 20590 

Dear Sir, 

This fetter is to let you know that I support continuance of Essential Air Services at Visalia, California, ---- --- , __________ _ and that my preferred carrier is Great Lakes Airline. 

Thank you, 

Susan Fouch 

50584 Deer Run Trail 

Oakhurst, CA 93644
### §122. Limitation on use of appropriations

No part of the appropriations made by Congress for the Howard University shall be used, directly or indirectly, for the support of the theological department of said university, nor for the support of any sectarian, denominational, or religious instruction therein; and no part thereof shall be paid to said university until it shall accord to the Secretary of Education, or to his designated agent or agents, authority to visit and inspect such university and to control and supervise the expenditure therein of all moneys paid under said appropriations.

(Mar. 3, 1899, ch. 424, 30 Stat. 1101; 1940 Reorg. Plan No. IV, §11(c), eff. June 30, 1940, 5 F.R. 2422, 54 Stat. 1237; 1953 Reorg. Plan No. 1, §§5, 8, eff. Apr. 11, 1953, 18 F.R. 2053, 67 Stat. 631; Pub. L. 96–88, title III, §301(a)(2)(M), title V, §507, Oct. 17, 1979, 93 Stat. 678, 692.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Prior Provisions

Similar prior provisions were contained in act July 1, 1898, ch. 546, 30 Stat. 624.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Transfer of Functions

"Secretary of Education" substituted in text for "Secretary of Health, Education, and Welfare" pursuant to sections 301(a)(2)(M) and 507 of Pub. L. 96–88, which are classified to sections 3441(a)(2)(M) and 3507 of this title and which transferred all functions of Secretary of Health, Education, and Welfare under this subchapter to Secretary of Education.

#### **Executive Documents**

#### Transfer of Functions

Functions of Federal Security Administrator transferred to Secretary of Health, Education, and Welfare and all agencies of Federal Security Agency transferred to Department of Health, Education, and Welfare by section 5 of Reorg. Plan No. 1 of 1953, set out in the Appendix to Title 5, Government Organization and Employees. Federal Security Agency and office of Administrator abolished by section 8 of Reorg. Plan No. 1 of 1953.

Functions of Department of the Interior relating to administration of Howard University transferred to Federal Security Agency to be administered under direction and supervision of Federal Security Administrator by Reorg. Plan No. IV of 1940, set out as a note in the Appendix to Title 5.
###### Editorial Note on Part 70

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 70 appear by T.D. ATF-450, 66 FR 29022-29030, May 29, 2001.

#### § 70.447 Assessments.

Where the evidence disclosed by investigation establishes that additional or delinquent tax liability has been incurred and not paid, the appropriate TTB officer will list the tax as an assessment. Notification and demand for payment of assessed taxes will be issued to the taxpayer by the appropriate TTB officer.

[T.D. ATF-301, 55 FR 47654, Nov. 14, 1990]
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Javier OJEDA-ZARAGOZA, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 05-41837.

Conference Calendar.

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.

Decided July 13, 2006.

James Lee Turner, Assistant U.S. Attorney, U.S. Attorney’s Office, Southern District of Texas, Houston, TX, for PlaintiffAppellee.

Marjorie A. Meyers, Federal Public Defender, Laura Fletcher Leavitt, Assistant Federal Public Defender, Molly E. Odom, Federal Public Defender’s Office, Southern District of Texas, Houston, TX, for Defendant-Appellant.

Before DAVIS, BARKSDALE, and DeMOSS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: *

Appealing the Judgment in a Criminal Case, Javier Ojeda-Zaragoza raises arguments that are foreclosed by *AlmendarezTorres v. United States,*523 U.S. 224, 235, 118 S.Ct. 1219, 140 L.Ed.2d 350 (1998), which held that 8 U.S.C. § 1326(b)(2) is a penalty provision and not a separate erimi*372nal offense. The Government’s motion for summary affirmance is GRANTED, and the judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.

*

 Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.
EXHIBIT 23

   Consent of Ernst & Young LLP, Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement (Form
S-8 Number 333-104308) pertaining to the PhotoWorks, Inc. 1999 Stock Incentive
Compensation Plan, as amended, the Registration Statement (Form S-8 Number
333-61048) pertaining to the PhotoWorks, Inc. 1999 Stock Incentive Compensation
Plan, as amended and the PhotoWorks, Inc. Individual Nonqualified Option
Agreements, the Registration Statement (Form S-8 Number 333-37698) pertaining to
PhotoWorks, Inc. 1999 Stock Incentive Compensation Plan, the Registration
Statement (Form S-8 Number 333-95277) pertaining to the PhotoWorks, Inc. 1999
Employee Stock Option Plan, the Registration Statement (Form S-8 Number
33-24107) pertaining to the PhotoWorks, Inc. Incentive Stock Option Plan, the
Registration Statement (Form S-8 Number 33-36020) pertaining to the PhotoWorks,
Inc. 1987 Stock Option Plan, the Registration Statement (Form S-8 Number
33-69530) pertaining to the PhotoWorks, Inc. 1993 Employee Stock Purchase Plan,
and the Registration Statements (Form S-8 Number 33-81332 and 333-02431)
pertaining to the PhotoWorks, Inc. Amended and Restated Incentive Stock Option
Plan and the Amended and Restated 1987 Stock Option Plan, of our report dated
October 29, 2004, (except for Note B, as to which the date is December 22,
2004), with respect to the consolidated financial statements and schedule of
PhotoWorks, Inc. included in the Annual Report (Form 10-K) for the year ended
September 25, 2004.


                                                   /S/ ERNST & YOUNG LLP

Seattle, Washington
December 23, 2004


                                       51
**EXHIBIT
      23.2**






***Consent
      of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm***




We
      consent to the incorporation by reference in the following Registration
      Statements of our report dated April 12, 2005, relating to the financial
      statements and financial statement schedule of Sigma Designs, Inc. for the
      years
      ended January 29, 2005 and January 31, 2004, appearing in this Annual Report
      on
      Form 10-K of Sigma Designs, Inc. for the year ended January 28,
      2006:




Registration
      Statement No. 333-86875 on Form S-8


Registration
      Statement No. 333-64234 on Form S-8


Registration
      Statement No. 333-83126 on Form S-8


Registration
      Statement No. 333-103513 on Form S-8


Registration
      Statement No. 333-106978 on Form S-8


Registration
      Statement No. 333-114374 on Form S-8


Registration
      Statement No. 333-122323 on Form S-3/A


Registration
      Statement No. 333-128895 on Form S-8


Registration
      Statement No. 333-132303 on Form S-8






/s/
      Deloitte & Touche LLP




San
      Jose,
      California


May
      5,
      2006








E-6
#### Angelo Paoli, Respondent, v. City of New York, Appellant.

Judgment unanimously affirmed, with costs. No opinion. Present — Glennon, J. P., Dore, Cohn, Callahan and Shientag, JJ.
### §758. Omitted

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section, Pub. L. 88–204, title IV, §408, as added Pub. L. 89–769, §7(a), Nov. 6, 1966, 80 Stat. 1318; amended Pub. L. 90–21, title I, §101, May 29, 1967, 81 Stat. 36; Pub. L. 90–575, title IV, §404, Oct. 16, 1968, 82 Stat. 1061; Pub. L. 91–606, title III, §301(g), Dec. 31, 1970, 84 Stat. 1759; Pub. L. 93–288, title VII, §702(g), formerly title VI, §602(g), May 22, 1974, 88 Stat. 164, renumbered title VII, §702(g), Pub. L. 103–337, div. C, title XXXIV, §3411(a)(1), (2), Oct. 5, 1994, 108 Stat. 3100, related to assistance for higher education construction in major disaster areas.
### §3443. Transfers from Department of Labor

#### (a) Functions relating to programs for the education of migrant and seasonal farmworkers

Notwithstanding the provisions of section 601 of this Act, there shall be transferred to the Secretary, at such time on or after May 4, 1980, as the Secretary certifies that there has been established in the Department a single component responsible for the administration and the coordination of programs relating to the education of migrants, all functions of the Secretary of Labor or the Department of Labor relating to such education.

#### (b) Authorization to conduct functions

The Secretary is authorized to conduct the functions transferred by subsection (a).

(Pub. L. 96–88, title III, §302, formerly §303, Oct. 17, 1979, 93 Stat. 680; renumbered §302, Pub. L. 103–382, title II, §271(a)(2), Oct. 20, 1994, 108 Stat. 3929; amended Pub. L. 105–277, div. A, §101(f) [title VIII, §405(d)(16)], Oct. 21, 1998, 112 Stat. 2681–337, 2681–421.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

Section 601 of this Act, referred to in subsec. (a), is section 601 of Pub. L. 96–88, which is set out as an Effective Date note under section 3401 of this title.

#### Prior Provisions

A prior section 302 of Pub. L. 96–88 was classified to section 3442 of this title prior to repeal by Pub. L. 99–145.

#### Amendments

1998—Subsec. (a). Pub. L. 105–277 substituted "relating to such education" for "under section 303(c)(2) of the Comprehensive Employment and Training Act".
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY HIGH

 332

 372

 389

 381

 353

 375

 404

 667

 710

 726

 751

 766

 792

 818

 830

 839

 859

 879

 895

 882

 918

 923

 933

 948

 993

 1,070

 1,097

 1,083

 1,064

 1,039

 1,048

 243

 273

 256

 226

 221

 207

 229

 282

 586

 576

 595

 613

 625

 662

 665

 629

 689

 667

 697

 734

 765

 675

 648

 750

 814

 843

 888

 917

 915

 862

 781

 288

 322

 339

 319

 303

 285

 329

 497

 629

 640

 655

 669

 686

 719

 735

 728

 746

 756

 782

 799

 824

 806

 810

 840

 903

 945

 985

 974

 969

 946

 924

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

AUGUST 2007 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: September 11, 2007

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

HOLLAND TRACT ON OLD RIVER
Exhibit 23

PENNROCK FINANCIAL SERVICES CORP.
CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS

               (Letterhead of Simon Lever & Company appears here)

                          INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' CONSENT

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the registration statement of
PennRock Financial Services Corp. on Form S-3 (No. 33-10568) of our report
dated January 31, 1997 on the consolidated financial statements of PennRock
Financial Services Corp. and subsidiaries appearing in and incorporated by
reference in this Annual Report on Form 10-K.

                                                  /s/  SIMON LEVER & COMPANY


March 11, 1997
Lancaster, Pennsylvania

<PAGE>
### §80k. Donation and transfer of lands and improvements, works of art, and other assets and property of Museum of African Art to Smithsonian Institution

The Board of Regents of the Smithsonian Institution (hereinafter in this subchapter referred to as the "Board") is authorized to accept a deed or other instrument donating and transferring to the Smithsonian Institution, the land and improvements thereto, collections of works of art, and all other assets and property of the Museum of African Art.

(Pub. L. 95–414, §1, Oct. 5, 1978, 92 Stat. 911.)

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date

Pub. L. 95–414, §7, Oct. 5, 1978, 92 Stat. 913, provided that: "Except for the provisions in sections 1 and 6(b) [this section and section 80p(b) of this title], the provisions of this Act [this subchapter] shall take effect on the date of transfer of a deed or other instrument under the provisions of section 1 [this section]."
#### William Robert Michelfelder, an Infant, by Catherine Michelfelder, His Guardian ad Litem, Respondent, v. Royal Baking Powder Company, Appellant.

Judgment modified on consent, and as modified judgment and order unanimously affirmed, with costs to the respondent. Present— Jenks, P. J., Thomas, Carr, Stapleton and Putnam, JJ. Order signed.
#### Almeda E. Daynard, Respondent, v. Amaziah Daynard and Others, Impleaded with Merton Sixbury and Ruth Sixbury, an Infant, etc., Appellants.

Judgment affirmed, with costs. All concurred, except Kruse, P. J,, and Foote, J., who dissented.
STEAM ELECTRIC CBI REPLACEMENT PAGE

EPA-HQ-OW-2009-0819

DCN: SE01295A3

THE FOLLOWING HAS BEEN REMOVED BECAUSE IT 

CONTAINS CONFIDENTIAL BUSINESS INFORMATION 

(CBI) PER 40 CFR PART 2, SUBPART B.
*No. 21229.*

#### Mark Wayne Hutton *v.*The People of the State of Colorado.

(398 P.2d 976)

Decided February 8, 1965.

Plaintiff in error, pro se.

Duke W. Dunbar, Attorney General, Frank E. Hickey, Deputy, John E. Bush, Assistant, for defendant in error.

*En Banc.*

Mr. Justice Frantz

delivered the opinion of the Court.

The defendant Hutton seeks by this writ of error to raise the identical question raised in the companion case of *Hutton v. The People,*No. 21228, decided this day.

*341In this case, he was charged with robbery of The Palmer House, Inc., located in Colorado Springs, on June 17, 1963. The same weapon was used in this robbery as was used in *Hutton v. The People,*No. 21228. The same plea was entered, and the same efforts at withdrawal of the plea were made. The same results attended.

Our decision in the companion case is dispositive of the identical question raised in this case.

Accordingly, reversal and directions as made in the companion case are entered here.

Mr. Justice Moore not participating.