alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1997
<CASH>                                           41353
<SECURITIES>                                    169605
<RECEIVABLES>                                    17221
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                228179
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  228179
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                          1000
<OTHER-SE>                                      227179
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    228179
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                      0
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                         0
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
(No. 6370

#### Mrs. Donald Barnett, Claimant, *vs.*State of Illinois, Department of Children and Family Services, Respondent.

*Opinion filed November 3, 1972.*

Mrs. Donald Barnett, Claimant, pro se.

William J. Scott, Attorney General; William E. Webber, Assistant Attorney General, for Respondent.

Perlin, C.J.
#### § 10.336 What are the time frames for submitting bills?

To be considered for payment, bills must be submitted by the end of the calendar year after the year when the expense was incurred, or by the end of the calendar year after the year when OWCP first accepted the claim as compensable, whichever is later.
A-AA+Skip to content

                  - Home
                  - Compendium Statistics
                  - Event
                  - Archives
                  - Glossary
                  - Help
                  - Contact
                  - Research on Disability

Annual Disability Statistics Compendium

              - Home /
              - Archives /
              - 2012 Compendium Statistics /
              - 2012 Social Security Administration Programs /
              - 2012 9.9a Social Security Disability Insurance—Change in the Number of Beneficiaries of Federally Administered Payments, Total and Disabled Worker Eligible

## Table 9.9a: Social Security Disability Insurance—Change in the Number of Beneficiaries of Federally Administered Payments, Total and Disabled Worker Eligible: 2009 to 2010

----

----

 

----

#### 2012 Disability Compendium

                        - Home
                        - Compendium Statistics                           - Population and Prevelance
                          - Employment
                          - Time Trend Population Statistics
                          - Poverty
                          - Earnings
                          - Veterans
                          - Health Insurance Coverage
                          - Health
                          - Social Security Administration Programs
                          - Medicaid and Medicare
                          - Special Education
                          - Vocational Rehabilitation
                          - Federal Government Spending and Employment
                          - International Disability Statistics
                          - Population Statistics: Disability Type
                        - Event
                        - Archives                           - 2012 Compendium Statistics
                        - Glossary
                        - Help
                        - Contact
                        - Research on Disability

#### Funding for this project is made possible by:

 The Research and Training Center on Disability Statistics and Demographics (StatsRRTC), which is funded by the U.S. Department of Education, National Institute for Disability and Rehabilitation Research, under cooperative agreements H133B080012.

#### Stay Connected

**Institute on Disability**10 West Edge Drive, Suite 101Durham, NH 03824603.862.4320 | relay: 711 | [email protected]www.iod.unh.edu

© 2013. Institute on Disability.University of New Hampshire.
GLD

- 367 NOT PRECEDENTIAL

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT

___________

No. 13

- 3041

___________

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

v.

DIODAYAN LEDESMA

- CUESTA

, Appellant

____________ ________________________
On Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania (D.C. Criminal No. 2:01

- cr

- 00374

- 001 ) District Judge: Honorable Stewart Dalzell

____________________________________

Submitted for Po ssible Summary Action Pursuant to Third Circuit LAR 27.4 and I.O.P. 10.6

August 1, 2013 Before: FUENTES, FISHER and VANASKIE

, Circuit Judges

(Opinion filed : August 15, 2013 )

_________

OPINION

_________

PER CURIAM

Diodayan Ledesma

- Cuesta appea ls an order denying his 28 U.S.C. § 1651

petition. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291. Having dealt with near

identical appeals from Ledesma

- Cuesta in the recent past, we will summary affirm for

substantially the same reasons discussed in our August 2012 opinion

. See United States2

v. Ledesma

- Cuesta , 476 F. App ’ x 412 , 412 (3d Cir. 2012) (nonprecedential per curiam) ;

see also 3d Cir. L.A.R. 27.4; 3d Cir. I.O.P. 10.6. To the extent that Ledesma

- Cuesta

relies on Kessack v. United States , No. C05

- 1828Z

, 2008 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 7739 (W.D.

Wash. Jan. 18, 2008)

, we have previously declined to follow that case

, and the Ninth

Circuit has explicitly rejected its outcome

. See United States v. Gamboa , 608 F.3d 492,

495 (9th Cir. 2010) (explaining that K essack is “ contrary to the law of [the Ninth]

Circuit ”); Massey v. United States , 581 F.3d 172, 174 n.2 (3d Cir. 2009) (per curiam).
Exhibit 31.1

                                 CERTIFICATIONS

I, Dwight O. Seegmiller, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Hills Bancorporation;

2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make
the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly
report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material
respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the
registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report;

4. The registrant's other certifying officers and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and we have:

      a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that
material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated
subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly
during the period in which this quarterly report is being prepared;

      b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and
procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of this
quarterly report (the "Evaluation Date"); and

      c) presented in this quarterly report our conclusions about the
effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures based on our evaluation
as of the Evaluation Date;

5. The registrant's other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our
most recent evaluation, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of
registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):

      a) all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal
controls which could adversely affect the registrant's ability to record,
process, summarize and report financial data and have identified for the
registrant's auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and

      b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal controls; and

6. The registrant's other certifying officers and I have indicated in this
quarterly report whether or not there were significant changes in internal
controls or in other factors that could significantly affect internal controls
subsequent to the date of our most recent evaluation, including any corrective
actions with regard to significant deficiencies and material weaknesses.


Date: 11/10/03                           By /s/ Dwight O. Seegmiller
                                            Dwight O. Seegmiller, President


                                       21
(No. 6742

#### Mason-Barron Laboratories, Inc., Claimant, vs. State of Illinois, Department of Mental Health, Respondent.

*Opinion filed August 10, 1972.*

Mason-Barron Laboratories, Inc., Claimant, pro se.

William J. Scott, Attorney General; Saul R. Wexler, Assistant Attorney General, for Respondent.

Perlin, C.J.
### §1067l. Repealed. Pub. L. 105–244, title III, §301(a)(8), Oct. 7, 1998, 112 Stat. 1636

Section, Pub. L. 89–329, title III, §366, formerly title X, §1047, as added Pub. L. 99–498, title X, §1002, Oct. 17, 1986, 100 Stat. 1567; amended Pub. L. 100–418, title VI, §6221, Aug. 23, 1988, 102 Stat. 1518; Pub. L. 102–325, title X, §1002(f), July 23, 1992, 106 Stat. 780; renumbered title III, §366, Pub. L. 105–244, title III, §301(a)(5), (7), Oct. 7, 1998, 112 Stat. 1636, authorized appropriations to carry out Fund for Improvement of Postsecondary Education program.

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section was formerly classified to section 1135d–6 of this title prior to renumbering by Pub. L. 105–244.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date of Repeal

Repeal effective Oct. 1, 1998, except as otherwise provided in Pub. L. 105–244, see section 3 of Pub. L. 105–244, set out as an Effective Date of 1998 Amendment note under section 1001 of this title.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY

 34,943

 34,497

 33,993

 33,609

 33,355

 33,054

 32,676

 32,252

 31,875

 30,720

 30,934

 30,442

 29,906

 29,414

 28,810

 28,224

 27,612

 26,981

 26,391

 25,785

 25,187

 24,642

 24,390

 24,060

 23,648

 23,112

 22,800

 22,397

 21,951

 21,588

 21,237

 39,690

 39,319

 39,050

 38,676

 38,191

 37,743

 37,840

 38,191

 38,559

 39,030

 39,478

 39,980

 40,515

 40,999

 41,590

 42,153

 42,755

 43,360

 43,931

 44,514

 45,085

 45,686

 46,011

 46,353

 46,751

 47,270

 47,588

 47,996

 48,415

 48,769

 49,113

STORAGE - A.F. 

 74,633

 73,816

 73,043

 72,285

 71,546

 70,797

 70,516

 70,443

 70,434

 69,750

 70,412

 70,422

 70,421

 70,413

 70,400

 70,377

 70,367

 70,341

 70,322

 70,299

 70,272

 70,328

 70,401

 70,413

 70,399

 70,382

 70,388

 70,393

 70,366

 70,357

 70,350

863

767

820

698

698

618

541

317

320

291

232

418

274

473

234

379

379

448

298

183

247

239

387

325

256

295

155

183

172

240

74

468

355

430

316

325

240

399

280

315

-54

566

423

273

469

227

367

374

435

288

171

233

267

424

331

249

286

158

186

158

235

70

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

OCTOBER 2012 FULL NATURAL FLOW AT NEW MELONES DAM RUN DATE: 01/18/2013

TOTALS -5,067 9,264

* October 1, 18,375

 0.9

 1.6

 2.5

 3.1

 3.8

 4.2

 5.0

 5.6

 6.2

 6.1

 7.2

 8.1

 8.6

 9.5

 10.0

 10.7

 11.5

 12.3

 12.9

 13.2

 13.7

 14.2

 15.1

 15.7

 16.2

 16.8

 17.1

 17.5

 17.8

 18.2

 18.4

DONNELLS

RES

BEARDSLEY

RES

2012 TO DATE

NEW

MELONES

INFLOW

C.F.S

NATURAL

RIVER

C.F.S

ACCUM *

FULL

NATURAL

1000 A.F.

RESERVOIR

TOTAL

-784

-817

-773

-758

-739

-749

-281

-73

-9

-684

+662

+10

-1

-8

-13

-23

-10

-26

-19

-23

-27

+56

+73

+12

-14

-17

+6

+5

-27

-9

-7

CHANGE

A.F. C.F.S.

-395

-412

-390

-382

-373

-378

-142

-37

-5

-345

+334

+5

-1

-4

-7

-12

-5

-13

-10

-12

-14

+28

+37

+6

-7

-9

+3

+3

-14

-5

-4
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY HIGH

 894

 933

 968

 961

 913

 974

 1,030

 1,129

 1,113

 1,107

 1,023

 988

 827

 858

 894

 960

 1,022

 1,063

 1,127

 1,164

 1,168

 1,119

 1,177

 1,148

 1,164

 1,187

 1,022

 972

 922

 988

 971

 616

 616

 588

 579

 575

 562

 561

 578

 586

 579

 571

 543

 519

 470

 447

 441

 397

 400

 415

 404

 400

 394

 393

 401

 415

 404

 433

 408

 418

 399

 382

 739

 728

 729

 684

 660

 684

 784

 775

 792

 867

 745

 702

 628

 606

 587

 601

 612

 600

 593

 647

 659

 495

 594

 587

 763

 789

 627

 605

 618

 610

 554

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

MARCH 2009 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: April 1, 2009

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

DELTA MENDOTA CANAL AT CHECK 13 (O'NEILL)
Final Listing of Questionnaire Files for Steam Electric Rulemaking Record

Plant ID 07483

Removed 

from Public 

(Non-CBI) 

Docket1

Copyright 

Flag2

File Name Description

x 07483\07483_Checklist.xls EPA Technical Review Checklist Workbook

07483\07483_Completeness_Checklist.xls EPA Completeness Review Checklist

x 07483\07483_Email Correspondence.pdf Email communications regarding questions on the survey response

07483\07483_HardcopyLog.doc EPA log of hardcopy documents submitted

x 07483\07483_Part A.xls Plant submitted survey file

x 07483\07483_Part B.xls Plant submitted survey file

x 07483\07483_Part C.xls Plant submitted survey file

x 07483\07483_Part D.xls Plant submitted survey file

x 07483\07483_Part H.xls Plant submitted survey file

07483\Certification Statement 07483.pdf Plant certification statement

x 07483\Supplemental Documents\07483_ESS D-1.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey

07483\Supplemental Documents\07483_ESS MAP-1.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey

x 07483\Supplemental Documents\07483_ESS MAP-2.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey

x 07483\Supplemental Documents\07483_ESS WB-1.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey

1

 Final reviewed survey responses are located in the Steam Electric Technical Questionnaire Database . 

2

 Copyright documents are available from the docket.
A-AA+Skip to content

                  - Home
                  - Compendium Statistics
                  - Event
                  - Archives
                  - Glossary
                  - Help
                  - Contact
                  - Research on Disability

Annual Disability Statistics Compendium

              - Home /
              - Compendium Statistics /
              - Social Security Administration Programs /
              - 9.7 Social Security Disability Insurance and Supplemental Security Income—Number of Total and Concurrent Beneficiaries, Age 18-64

## Table 9.7: Social Security Disability Insurance and Supplemental Security Income—Number of Total and Concurrent Beneficiaries, Ages 18 to 64: December 2011

----

----

 

----

#### 2012 Disability Compendium

                        - Home
                        - Compendium Statistics                           - Population and Prevelance
                          - Employment
                          - Time Trend Population Statistics
                          - Poverty
                          - Earnings
                          - Veterans
                          - Health Insurance Coverage
                          - Health
                          - Social Security Administration Programs
                          - Medicaid and Medicare
                          - Special Education
                          - Vocational Rehabilitation
                          - Federal Government Spending and Employment
                          - International Disability Statistics
                          - Population Statistics: Disability Type
                        - Event
                        - Archives                           - 2012 Compendium Statistics
                        - Glossary
                        - Help
                        - Contact
                        - Research on Disability

#### Funding for this project is made possible by:

 The Research and Training Center on Disability Statistics and Demographics (StatsRRTC), which is funded by the U.S. Department of Education, National Institute for Disability and Rehabilitation Research, under cooperative agreements H133B080012.

#### Stay Connected

**Institute on Disability**10 West Edge Drive, Suite 101Durham, NH 03824603.862.4320 | relay: 711 | [email protected]www.iod.unh.edu

© 2013. Institute on Disability.University of New Hampshire.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY

 57,812

 57,852

 57,897

 57,860

 57,747

 57,714

 57,710

 57,735

 57,682

 57,625

 57,528

 57,435

 57,403

 57,419

 57,374

 57,358

 57,309

 57,237

 57,180

 57,139

 57,115

 57,127

 57,131

 57,362

 57,548

 57,532

 57,516

 57,399

 57,309

 57,245

 57,184

 84,269

 85,999

 87,659

 89,401

 90,780

 91,529

 92,344

 93,416

 94,585

 95,474

 96,023

 96,337

 96,760

 97,183

 97,457

 97,443

 97,342

 97,813

 97,068

 97,047

 97,097

 97,198

 97,291

 97,140

 97,047

 97,140

 97,162

 97,191

 97,111

 96,968

 96,796

STORAGE - A.F. 

 142,081

 143,851

 145,556

 147,261

 148,527

 149,243

 150,054

 151,151

 152,267

 153,099

 153,551

 153,772

 154,163

 154,602

 154,831

 154,801

 154,651

 155,050

 154,248

 154,186

 154,212

 154,325

 154,422

 154,502

 154,595

 154,672

 154,678

 154,590

 154,420

 154,213

 153,980

3,286

3,383

3,275

3,103

3,087

3,241

3,113

2,857

2,847

2,881

2,866

2,647

2,354

2,242

2,370

2,407

2,431

2,211

4,768

1,865

1,771

1,705

1,674

1,812

1,504

1,740

1,687

1,694

1,603

1,479

1,520

3,777

4,275

4,135

3,963

3,725

3,602

3,522

3,410

3,410

3,300

3,094

2,758

2,551

2,463

2,485

2,392

2,355

2,412

4,364

1,834

1,784

1,762

1,723

1,852

1,551

1,779

1,690

1,650

1,517

1,375

1,403

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

JULY 2017 FULL NATURAL FLOW AT NEW MELONES DAM RUN DATE: 08/01/2017

TOTALS +12,872 81,913

* October 1, 162,474

 2,669.7

 2,678.2

 2,686.4

 2,694.3

 2,701.6

 2,708.8

 2,715.8

 2,722.5

 2,729.3

 2,735.9

 2,742.0

 2,747.5

 2,752.5

 2,757.4

 2,762.3

 2,767.1

 2,771.7

 2,776.5

 2,785.2

 2,788.8

 2,792.4

 2,795.9

 2,799.3

 2,803.0

 2,806.0

 2,809.6

 2,812.9

 2,816.2

 2,819.2

 2,821.9

 2,824.7

DONNELLS

RES

BEARDSLEY

RES

2016 TO DATE

NEW

MELONES

INFLOW

C.F.S

NATURAL

RIVER

C.F.S

ACCUM *

FULL

NATURAL

1000 A.F.

RESERVOIR

TOTAL

+973

+1,770

+1,705

+1,705

+1,266

+716

+811

+1,097

+1,116

+832

+452

+221

+391

+439

+229

-30

-150

+399

-802

-62

+26

+113

+97

+80

+93

+77

+6

-88

-170

-207

-233

CHANGE

A.F. C.F.S.

+491

+892

+860

+860

+638

+361

+409

+553

+563

+419

+228

+111

+197

+221

+115

-15

-76

+201

-404

-31

+13

+57

+49

+40

+47

+39

+3

-44

-86

-104

-117
#### In the Matter of RALJOED REALTY CO., Inc., Bankrupt. In the Matter of PARK TOWERS CORP., Bankrupt.

In Bankruptcy Nos. 67-B-319, 67-B-320.

United States District Court S. D. New York.

June 29, 1967.

Judgment Affirmed Nov. 17, 1967.

See 387 F.2d 948.

Levin & Weintraub, New York City, for the bankrupts.

Joseph Grassmuck, individually, and the firm of Demov & Morris, New York City, for Evelyn Marks.

PALMIERI, District Judge.

Referee Babitt dismissed the petitions in bankruptcy filed by Ral joed Realty Co., Inc. and Park Towers Corp., two New York corporations which were formed about forty years ago. These corporations never promulgated any bylaws nor did they have any formal meetings of stockholders or directors. The executrix of a deceased stockholder, and holder in that capacity of 33 shares of stock, filed two voluntary petitions in bankruptcy on March 30, 1967, “on behalf of the above companies,” styling herself as an “agent” for the purpose of the two voluntary petitions in bankruptcy, and as “petitioner” in the subsequently filed schedules. The executrix referred to, Evelyn Marks, is involved in extensive litigation with the other stockholder of the corporations, Joseph Grassmuck, who also holds 33 shares of stock. No information was provided with respect to the ownership of the remaining 34 shares which were issued.

The sole and crucial question presented is whether or not a stockholder, who is not a director and who does not purport to act by authority of the directors, may file petitions in bankruptcy for the companies.

 Referee Babitt filed an extensive and scholarly opinion on the point, to which nothing need be added by this Court except to underscore the significance of the basic rule set forth in Price v. Gurney, 324 U.S. 100, 65 S.Ct. 513, 89 L.Ed. 776 (1945), which restates the basic principle that the operation of a *226Corporation must be left to those with the power of management, namely, the board of directors. Other decisions have sustained the principle that the board, and only the board, and not a stockholder, may authorize the filing of a petition in bankruptcy. In re Joseph Feld & Co., 38 F.Supp. 506 (D.C.N.J.1941); In re Jefferson Casket Co., 182 F. 689 (N.D.N.Y.1910).

The petition to review is dismissed and the order of the Referee is affirmed.

It is so ordered.
STEAM ELECTRIC

CBI REPLACEMENT PAGE

EPA-HQ-OW-2009-0819

DCN: ________________________________________

THE FOLLOWING HAS BEEN REMOVED BECAUSE IT 

CONTAINS CONFIDENTIAL BUSINESS INFORMATION 

(CBI) PER 40 CFR PART 2, SUBPART B.

SE04360A139