alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Editorial Note on Part 478
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 478 appear by T.D. ATF-411, 64 FR 17291, Apr. 9, 1999, T.D. ATF-487, 68 FR 3750, Jan. 24, 2003, and ATF-11F, 73 FR 57240, Oct. 2, 2008.

§ 478.29 Out-of-State acquisition of firearms by nonlicensees. No person, other than a licensed importer, licensed manufacturer, licensed dealer, or licensed collector, shall transport into or receive in the State where the person resides (or if a corporation or other business entity, where it maintains a place of business) any firearm purchased or otherwise obtained by such person outside that State: *Provided,* That the provisions of this section: ( a ) Shall not preclude any person who lawfully acquires a firearm by bequest or intestate succession in a State other than his State of residence from transporting the firearm into or receiving it in that State, if it is lawful for such person to purchase or possess such firearm in that State,
( b ) Shall not apply to the transportation or receipt of a rifle or shotgun obtained from a licensed manufacturer, licensed importer, licensed dealer, or licensed collector in a State other than the transferee's State of residence in an over-the-counter transaction at the licensee's premises obtained in conformity with the provisions of § 478.96(c) and
( c ) Shall not apply to the transportation or receipt of a firearm obtained in conformity with the provisions of §§ 478.30 and 478.97.
[T.D. ATF-270, 53 FR 10493, Mar. 31, 1988]
A-AA+Skip to content

                  - Home
                  - Compendium Statistics
                  - Event
                  - Archives
                  - Glossary
                  - Help
                  - Contact
                  - Research on Disability

Annual Disability Statistics Compendium

              - Home /
              - Archives /
              - 2012 Compendium Statistics /
              - 2012 Special Education /
              - 2012 11.5 Special Education—Students Ages 14-21 Served under IDEA, Part B, Left School, by Reason

## Table 11.5: Special Education—Students Ages 14 to 21 Served under IDEA, Part B, Left School, by Reason: 2009-2010

----

----

 

----

#### 2012 Disability Compendium

                        - Home
                        - Compendium Statistics                           - Population and Prevelance
                          - Employment
                          - Time Trend Population Statistics
                          - Poverty
                          - Earnings
                          - Veterans
                          - Health Insurance Coverage
                          - Health
                          - Social Security Administration Programs
                          - Medicaid and Medicare
                          - Special Education
                          - Vocational Rehabilitation
                          - Federal Government Spending and Employment
                          - International Disability Statistics
                          - Population Statistics: Disability Type
                        - Event
                        - Archives                           - 2012 Compendium Statistics
                        - Glossary
                        - Help
                        - Contact
                        - Research on Disability

#### Funding for this project is made possible by:

 The Research and Training Center on Disability Statistics and Demographics (StatsRRTC), which is funded by the U.S. Department of Education, National Institute for Disability and Rehabilitation Research, under cooperative agreements H133B080012.

#### Stay Connected

**Institute on Disability**10 West Edge Drive, Suite 101Durham, NH 03824603.862.4320 | relay: 711 | [email protected]www.iod.unh.edu

© 2013. Institute on Disability.University of New Hampshire.
#### In the Matter of the Accounting of Gertrude Parnes, as Administratrix of the Estate of Henry Parnes, Deceased, Respondent. Jacob Kaplan, Special Guardian of Howard L. Parnes and Another, Infants, Appellants.

Decree, so far as appealed from, unanimously affirmed, with costs to the respondent-payable out of the estate. No opinion. Present — Peck, P. J., Glennon, Cohn, Callahan and Van Voorhis, JJ.
Editorial Note on Part 21
Editorial Notes: Nomenclature changes to part 21 appear by T.D. ATF-435, 66 FR 5475, Jan. 19, 2001. Nomenclature changes to part 21 appear by 81 T.D. TTB-140, 81 FR Aug. 30, 2016.

§ 21.64 Formula No. 37. ( a ) *Formula.* To every 100 gallons of alcohol add: Forty-five fluid ounces of eucalyptol, N.F. XII, 30 avoirdupois ounces of thymol, N.F., and 20 avoirdupois ounces of menthol, U.S.P.
( b ) *Authorized uses.* ( 1 ) As a solvent: 111. Hair and scalp preparations. 112. Bay rum. 113. Lotions and creams (hand, face, and body). 131. Dentifrices. 132. Mouth washes. 210. External pharmaceuticals, not U.S.P. or N.F. 244. Antispetic solutions, U.S.P. or N.F. 410. Disinfectants, insecticides, fungicides, and other biocides. 430. Sterilizing and preserving solutions. 470. Theater sprays, incense, and room deodorants.
( 2 ) Miscellaneous uses:
812. Product development and pilot plant uses (own use only).
[T.D. ATF-133, 48 FR 24673, June 2, 1983, as amended by T.D. TTB-140, 81 FR 59461, Aug. 30, 2016]
```

[Congressional Bills 114th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 3779 Referred in Senate (RFS)]

<DOC>
114th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 3779

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                           September 27, 2016

Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Homeland Security 
                        and Governmental Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
    To restrict the inclusion of social security account numbers on 
    documents sent by mail by the Federal Government, and for other 
                               purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Social Security Fraud Prevention Act 
of 2016''.

SEC. 2. RESTRICTION OF SSNS ON DOCUMENTS SENT BY MAIL.

    (a) In General.--No department or agency of the Federal Government 
may include the Social Security account number of any individual on any 
document sent by mail unless the head of such department or agency 
determines that the inclusion of such Social Security number on such 
document is necessary.
    (b) Regulations.--Not later than 1 year after the date of the 
enactment of this Act, the head of each department and agency of the 
Federal Government shall issue regulations specifying the circumstances 
under which inclusion of a Social Security account number on a document 
sent by mail is necessary. Such regulations shall include--
            (1) instructions for the partial redaction of Social 
        Security account numbers whenever feasible; and
            (2) a requirement that Social Security account numbers not 
        be visible on the outside of any package sent by mail.
    (c) Effective Date.--This Act shall apply with respect to documents 
sent by mail on or after the date that is 1 year after the date of the 
enactment of this Act.

            Passed the House of Representatives September 26, 2016.

            Attest:

                                                 KAREN L. HAAS,

                                                                 Clerk.
```
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
NAVTECH, Inc. and SUBSIDIARIES
EXHIBIT 32
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------


                    CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
                           AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
                                   PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

     The undersigned hereby certify,  pursuant to, and as required by, 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted  pursuant to Section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of
2002, that the Annual Report of Navtech, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-KSB for
year ended  October 31, 2004 fully  complies  with the  requirements  of Section
13(a) or 15(d) of the  Securities  Exchange  Act of 1934,  as amended,  and that
information  contained in such Annual Report on Form 10-KSB fairly presents,  in
all material respects,  the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.



Dated: December 16, 2004
                                              ----------------------------------
                                              David Strucke
                                              Chief Executive Officer



                                              ----------------------------------
                                              Gordon Heard
                                              Chief Financial Officer
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY ELEV

 849.28

 849.73

 850.36

 851.58

 852.69

 855.58

 857.61

 858.72

 859.33

 860.07

 861.07

 862.17

 863.80

 866.20

 867.76

 868.95

 869.66

 870.45

 871.36

 872.29

 873.34

 874.52

 875.53

 876.44

 877.28

 877.50

 878.50

 879.84

 880.39

 880.74

 881.11

 462.0

 464.0

 466.8

 472.3

 477.3

 490.6

 500.0

 505.2

 508.1

 511.6

 516.3

 521.6

 529.4

 541.1

 548.8

 554.7

 558.3

 562.2

 566.8

 571.5

 576.9

 582.9

 588.1

 592.8

 597.2

 598.3

 603.6

 610.6

 613.5

 615.4

 617.3

STORAGE

+3.3

+2.0

+2.8

+5.5

+5.0

+13.2

+9.4

+5.2

+2.9

+3.5

+4.8

+5.3

+7.9

+11.7

+7.7

+5.9

+3.5

+4.0

+4.6

+4.7

+5.3

+6.0

+5.2

+4.7

+4.4

+1.1

+5.2

+7.1

+2.9

+1.9

+2.0

CHANGE

1,996

1,328

1,447

2,797

2,597

6,886

4,796

2,728

2,153

2,155

2,825

2,857

4,220

6,112

3,914

3,030

2,029

2,393

2,637

2,501

2,773

3,094

2,662

2,445

2,361

773

2,744

4,080

2,360

2,105

1,873

INFLOW

 319

 294

 10

 27

 63

 165

 29

 105

 695

 383

 425

 194

 236

 204

 27

 29

 227

 377

 301

 104

 57

 34

 17

 48

 134

 164

 79

 492

 871

 1,147

 854

POWER

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

SPILL

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

OUTLET

 19

 22

 16

 4

 0

 46

 12

 0

 9

 8

 5

 11

 25

 13

 13

 23

 15

 21

 26

 25

 23

 15

 23

 22

 25

 30

 27

 32

 21

 22

 28

C.F.S.

 .13

 .15

 .11

 .03

 .00

 .31

 .08

 .00

 .06

 .05

 .03

 .07

 .16

 .08

 .08

 .14

 .09

 .13

 .16

 .15

 .14

 .09

 .14

 .13

 .15

 .18

 .16

 .19

 .12

 .13

 .16

INCHES

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .08

 .78

 1.37

 1.13

 .05

 .01

 .00

 .00

 1.14

 .42

 1.51

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .02

 .50

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

PRECIP

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

MARCH 2016 NEW MELONES LAKE DAILY OPERATIONS RUN DATE: April 7, 2016

IN LAKE

EVAPORATION

INCHES

C.F.S.

COMPUTED*

1000 ACRE-FEET

RELEASE - C.F.S.

TOTALS +158.7 88,671 8,111 0 0 581 3.60 7.01

ACRE-FEET +158,700 175,879 16,088 0 0 1,152

COMMENTS:

* COMPUTED INFLOW IS THE SUM OF CHANGE IN STORAGE, RELEASES AND EVAPORATION.

SUMMARY

RELEASE (ACRE-FEET)

POWER 16,088

SPILL 0

OUTLET

TOTAL

 0

 16,088

PRECIPITATION

THIS MONTH =

TO DATE =

 7.01

JULY 1, 2015 27.77

 458.7

Table 13
### SI0-100317-02 7 CONTRO L NO . 

### CHARLOTT E Marc h 10 , 201 0

C O

— I S i Th e Honorabl e Ray LaHoo d Secretary - " Unite dState s Departmen t o f Transportatio n 120 0 Ne w Jerse y Avenue , S E ;i l Washington , D,C . 2059 0 Subject : Haned aCombinatio n Service s Allocatio n Proceedin g DOT-OST-2010-001 8 Dea r Secretary LaHood : I applau dyou r

effort s o n th e recen t

histori c ope n skie s agreemen t with Japan . Recognizin g tha t th e wid e rangin g opportunitie s mad e possibl e b y th e agreemen t includ e ne w ai r

servic e t o Toky o Haned aairport , I wante dyo u t o kno w that I support Continenta l Airlines ' applicatio n t o provid e dail y nonsto p servic e fromNe w York/Newark . Tha t gatewa y at

Continental' s Newar k

Libert y hu b allow s a n easy , one-airlin e connectio n betwee n Toky o Haned aan dou r door . Continenta l Airline s i s committe dt o th e Asia n regio n an dt o nonsto p Toky o Haned aservice . Becaus e Continenta l ha s th e larges t hu b i n th e Ne w York/Newark regio n capabl e o f

connectin g destination s acros s th e U.S . with Toky o Haneda , Continental' s proposa l at Libert y offer s ou r

city an dregio n an eas t

coas t connectin g gateway . Th e individua l economie s i n th e regio n an dth e million s o f

U.S . consumer s her e wil l benefi t fro mContinental' s propose dservice , an dwil l combin e t o mak e thi s ne w Toky o Haned aservic e fro mNewark Liberty area l success . Fo r th e benefit s tha t

thei r applicatio n bring s t o my communit y an ds o man y other s throughou t th e east , I urg e that

yo u awar dToky o Haned aright s t o Continenta l Airline s a t Newark Liberty Internationa l Airport . Than k yo u for you r seriou s consideration . Sincerely , Anthon y R . Fox x Mayo r

Offic e o f th e Mayo r60 0 Eas t Fourt h Stree t Charlotte , N C 28202-283 9 704/336-224 1
#### In the Matter of Frank O. Bauer, as Treasurer of Rochester State Hospital, Appellant. Thomas S. Byrne, Respondent.

*817Present — Crosby, P. J., Cunningham, Taylor, Dowling and MeCurn, JJ.
### §130aa–2. Investments

(a) The University shall invest its endowment fund corpus and endowment fund income in those low-risk instruments and securities in which a regulated insurance company may invest under the law of the District of Columbia, such as federally insured bank savings account or comparable interest bearing account, certificate of deposit, money market fund, mutual fund, or obligations of the United States.

(b) The University, in investing its endowment fund corpus and income, shall exercise the judgment and care, under circumstances then prevailing, which a person of prudence, discretion, and intelligence would exercise in the management of his own business affairs.

(Pub. L. 98–480, title II, §204, Oct. 17, 1984, 98 Stat. 2246.)
Regulatory Evaluation



### Docket No. FAA-';;b\c{- 

# Cf?tl1 r'\ 

# " !

_ 

# FJ fJ\

- 

# ooS -AP Directorate Identifier:



## ~ If

yo u mak e changes t o th e valu es in the table below, yo u must ens ure th e t ot

als u pdate acco rding l y. 

## If they do not , click (o r T ab) into and th en o ut of the changed cell.
Estimated Costs: Action Costs per Product (e.g., aircraft, engine, propeller, appliance) (e.g., Inspection , Work-hours Labor Parts Cost Total Costs Number of Total Cost

replacement) (inc lude cost (labor+ 

## u.s. for U.S. Fleet Do not include oncondition costs here access, testing, (@$85/h parts) Registered and close-up) our) Products Functional Test of the Captain and First Officer's 3.0 5 :255.00 $0 $255.00 360 591.800.00 Altimeter (MD-80) Functional Test of the Captain and 3.0 5 :255.00 $0 $ 255.00 65 516.575.00 First Officer's Altimete (MD-90) Functional Test of the Captain and 3.0 5 :255.00 $0 $ 255.00 109 527.795.00 First Officer's Altimete (DC-1 0) Functional Test of the Captain and 3.0 5 255.00 $0 $ 255.00 76 519.380.00 First Officer's Altimete (MD-1 0) Functional Test of the Captain and 3.0 5 :255.00 $0 $255.00 106 5 0.00 First Officer's Altimete (717) 5 0.00 $ 0.00 I 5 0.00 I 5 0.00 $ 0.00 I 5 0.00 5 0.00 $ 0

.00 

## s 0.00
I 

## s 0.00 $ 0.00 5 0.00 5 0.00 $ 0.00 

## s 0.00 

## s 0.00 $ 0.00 

## s 0.00 5 0.00 $ 0.00 5 0.00 5 0.00 $ 0.00 

## s 0.00 

## s 0

.00 $ 0.00 

## s 0.00 

## s 0.00 $ 0.00 5 0.00 

## s 0.00 $ 0.00 5 0.00 

## s 0.00 $ 0.00 

## s 0.00 

## s 0.00 $ 0.00 

## s 0.00 

## s 0.00 $ 0.00 

## s 0.00 5 0.00 $ 0.00 

## s 0.00 

### 7The known number of products in compliance: Total Costs of compliance for U.S. fleet: $155,550 Costs covered under warranty (if known) $


### On-Condition Costs:

## ~ Action Work-hours Labor cost Parts Cost Cost per Product (e.g., Inspection, (include access, (@$85/hour) testing, and close- replacement) up) 

## s 0.00 $ 0

.00 

## s 0.00 $ 0

.00 I 

## s 0.00 $ 0.00 I 

## s 0.00 I $ 0.00 

### Special considerations for Economic Analysis (Use thisfield to explain anything in the Estimated Costs table that was assumed or might not be obvious. Thisfield can also be used to explain warranty costs): 

### Executive Order 12866: Could the AD be considered a "significant regulatory action"? · · YES* 

# D NO 

### [g) *Explanation: 

### DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedures: Is the AD significant?

. , YES* 

## D NO 

### [g) *Explanation: 

### Regulatory Flexibility Act: Will the AD have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities? Explain for either a Yes or No answer .• YES 

# D NO 

### [g) Explanation : 

### No, it will not have a significant economic impact Intrastate Aviation in Alaska: This AD could affect intrastate aviation in Alaska. Is it appropriate to include specific requirements for aircraft operated in Alaska where aviation might be the only mode oftransportation? • YES* 

# D NO 

### [g) *Explanation:



### 8
###### Editorial Note on Part 41

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 41 (formerly part 275) appear at T.D. ATF-460, 66 FR 39093, July 27, 2001.

#### § 41.226 Change in control of a corporation.

When the issuance, sale, or transfer of the stock of a corporation operating as an importer of tobacco products results in a change in the identity of the principal stockholders exercising actual or legal control of the operations of the corporation, the corporate importer must, within 30 days after the change occurs, apply for a new permit on TTB F 5230.4. If the application is not timely made, the present permit will automatically terminate at the expiration of that 30-day period, and the importer must dispose of all tobacco products on hand in accordance with this part, make a concluding report in accordance with § 41.206, and surrender the permit with that report. If the application for a new permit is timely made, the present permit will continue in effect pending final action with respect to the new application.
### §1221e–3. General authority of Secretary

The Secretary, in order to carry out functions otherwise vested in the Secretary by law or by delegation of authority pursuant to law, and subject to limitations as may be otherwise imposed by law, is authorized to make, promulgate, issue, rescind, and amend rules and regulations governing the manner of operation of, and governing the applicable programs administered by, the Department.

(Pub. L. 90–247, title IV, §410, formerly §408, as added Pub. L. 93–380, title V, §502(a)(1), Aug. 21, 1974, 88 Stat. 559; amended Pub. L. 95–561, title XII, §§1243(b), 1244, Nov. 1, 1978, 92 Stat. 2353; renumbered §410 and amended Pub. L. 103–382, title II, §§212(b)(1), 222, Oct. 20, 1994, 108 Stat. 3913, 3914.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

1994—Pub. L. 103–382, §222, amended section generally, substituting single par. relating to general authority of Secretary for former subsecs. (a) to (d) relating to general authority of administrative heads of education agencies.

1978—Subsec. (a). Pub. L. 95–561, §1243(b), inserted "or by delegation of authority pursuant to law" after "vested in him by law" in provisions preceding par. (1) and, in par. (1), inserted ", and governing the applicable programs administered by" after "the manner of operation of".

Subsecs. (b) to (d). Pub. L. 95–561, §1244, added subsec. (b), redesignated former subsecs. (b) and (c) as (c) and (d), and in subsec. (d) as so redesignated substituted "For the purposes of this chapter" for "For the purposes of this section".

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date of 1978 Amendment

Pub. L. 95–561, title XV, §1530, Nov. 1, 1978, 92 Stat. 2380, as amended by Pub. L. 96–46, §2(a)(10), Aug. 6, 1979, 93 Stat. 340, provided that:

"(a) Except as otherwise specifically provided in this Act, the provisions of this Act and the amendments and repeals made by this Act [see Tables for classification] shall take effect October 1, 1978.

"(b) The provisions of section 412(b)(2) [now 421(b)(2)] of the General Education Provisions Act [section 1225(b)(2) of this title], as added by section 1245 of this Act, shall not take effect with respect to the use of funds under section 421 of the Elementary and Secondary Education Act of 1965 [former section 3101 of this title] until October 1, 1980, except at the option of local educational agencies."

#### Effective Date

Pub. L. 93–380, title V, §502(b), Aug. 21, 1974, 88 Stat. 560, provided that: "The amendments made by this section [enacting this section and section 1221e–2 and amending sections 1221b and 1221e of this title] shall be effective on the tenth day after the date of enactment of this Act [Aug. 21, 1974]."
#### Miltenberg & Samton, Inc., Respondent, *v.*Percival E. Falkingham, Appellant.

First Department,

May 10, 1948.

*Copal Mints*for appellant.

*George Bamasheh*of counsel *(John H. Maass,*attorney), for respondent.

*632
      *Per Curiam.*

The trial court was without power to substantially change the decision and direction for judgment filed on December 24, 1947. The second decision made seven days-later which purported to grant judgment to plaintiff on the second cause of action in place of a judgment for the defendant as directed in the original decision was a nullity.

When a decision on the merits has been rendered after a trial, the court is without power to make a different decision. It may only correct errors clerical in their nature or in a proper case, it may set aside its decision and order a new trial, but it is not authorized to make a new decision. *(Kamp*v. *Kamp,*59 N. Y. 212; *Herpe*v. *Herpe,*225 N. Y. 323, 327; *Corr*v. *Hoffman,*256 N. Y. 254, 268; *Hydraulic Power Co.*v. *Pettebone-Cataract Paper Co.,*194 App. Div. 819, 820; *Heintz*v. *Darmstadt,*140 App. Div. 252.)

A reversal of the judgment appealed from will make possible the entry of a judgment based upon the -decision of the court as announced on December 24, 1947. From that judgment plaintiff will have the right to appeal upon the merits, if so advised.

It would appear that the appellant was entitled to have the judgment irregularly obtained vacated upon motion. *(Kamp*v. *Kamp,*59 N. Y. 212, 215-218, *supra.)*However, as appellant is afforded full and adequate relief by our reversal of the invalid judgment, it becomes unnecessary to pass, upon the appeal from the order denying defendant’s motion to set aside such judgment.

The judgment appealed from should be reversed, with costs to the appellant and the clerk directed to enter judgment in accordance with the decision filed December 24, 1947.

The appeal from the order entered February-9, 1948, should be dismissed.

Peck, P. J., Glennon, Cohn, Callahan and Shientag, JJ., concur.

Judgment unanimously reversed, with costs to the appellant and judgment directed to be entered in accordance with the decision filed December 24, 1947. Appeal from order entered February 9, 1948, unanimously dismissed. Settle order on notice.