alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-2000
<CASH>                                           1,120
<SECURITIES>                                     5,203
<RECEIVABLES>                                    5,803
<ALLOWANCES>                                       262
<INVENTORY>                                      2,656
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                14,699
<PP&E>                                           9,610
<DEPRECIATION>                                   5,060
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  20,235
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            6,844
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         8,698
<OTHER-SE>                                       1,142
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    20,235
<SALES>                                          5,925
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 5,925
<CGS>                                            4,402
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    4,402
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 1,317
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  27
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    179
<INCOME-TAX>                                        65
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                114
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                        14
<EPS-BASIC>                                       0.04
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.04


</TABLE>
### §5981. Short title

This subchapter may be cited as the "Minority-Focused Civics Education Act of 1994".

(Pub. L. 103–227, title VIII, §801, Mar. 31, 1994, 108 Stat. 209.)
Page 1 of 3

Disposition Comments

Docket No: FAA-2012-0218 SNPRM

Directorate ID: 2012-CE-003-AD

Originating Office Tracking No.: 

 NO COMMENTS RECEIVED – If this box is checked, no signatures are required.

 Has the referenced service information been revised since the NPRM was issued? If yes, 

list latest revision and attach a copy. Note that changes beyond the scope of the previously 

published NPRM will require a new notice. Contact the Directorate focal point for guidance.

Instructions: Summarize all comments by issue (not by commenter) and provide your recommended resolution of 

each issue. All comments relating to the same issue should be discussed together. Do not list all of the issues 

from one commenter together. If changes to the AD are required based on the comments received, explain why and 

describe in detail what change(s) you recommend. Reference FAA-IR-M-8040.1C Chapter 9.

ISSUE 1: Select one of the following: 

If other, explain: 

Commenter(s): 

What change to the AD action is requested? 

Why is the change requested or how is it justified? 

Do we agree? 

If YES, we agree because Make the following changes to the AD: 

If PARTIALLY AGREE, we agree with because We disagree with because 

Make the following changes to the AD: 

If NO, we don’t agree because 

ISSUE 2: Select one of the following: 

If other, explain: 

Commenter(s): 

What change to the AD action is requested? 

Why is the change requested or how is it justified? 

Do we agree? 

If YES, we agree because Make the following changes to the AD: 

If PARTIALLY AGREE, we agree with because We disagree with because 

Make the following changes to the AD:

If NO, we don’t agree because 
Page 2 of 3

For additional issues, double-click here
Page 3 of 3

Signature Section

Signature indicates concurrence with this action.

Originating Office Tracking No.: 

ASE Date

Branch Manager Date
Exhibit 31.2**CERTIFICATIONS**
I, J. Gregory Ambro, certify that:

 

1.	I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of GottschalksInc.;

2.	Based on my knowledge, this annual report does notcontain any untrue statement of a material 	fact or omit to state a materialfact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the 	circumstancesunder which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period	covered by this report; 

3.	Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, andother financial information included in 	this report, fairly present in allmaterial respects the financial condition, results of 	operations and	cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in thisreport;

4.	The registrant's other certifying officers and I areresponsible for establishing and maintaining 	disclosure controls andprocedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) 	forthe 	registrant and have:

	a)	Designed such disclosure controls and procedures,or caused such disclosure controls and 		procedures to be designed underour supervision,  to ensure that material information 			relating tothe registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by			others within those entities, particularly during the period inwhich this annual report is 			being prepared;

	b)	Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant'sdisclosure controls and procedures and 			presented in this report ourconclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls 			andprocedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such				evaluation; and

	c)	Disclosed in this report any change in theregistrant's internal control over financial 			reporting that occurredduring the registrant's most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant's			fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that hasmaterially affected, or is 			reasonably likely to materially affect,the registrant's internal control over financial 			reporting; and 

5.	The registrant's other certifying officers and I havedisclosed, based on our most recent 	evaluation of internal control overfinancial reporting, to the registrant's auditors and the audit 	committee ofregistrant's board of directors 	(or persons performing the equivalentfunctions):

	a)	all significant deficiencies and materialweaknesses in the design or operation of internal 			controls overfinancial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the			registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and reportfinancial information; and

	b)	any fraud, whether or not material, that involvesmanagement or other employees who 			have a significant role in theregistrant's internal control over financial reporting.

April 26, 2004 
By: 
/s/ J. Gregory Ambro 
 
J. Gregory Ambro 
 *Chief Administrative and Financial Officer*
#### Lucille E. Neddo, as Executrix of Francis J. Neddo, Deceased, Respondent, v. County of Saratoga et al., Appellants.

Motion for leave to appeal to the Court of Appeals and for the certification of questions of law. Motion denied, with $10 costs. Hill, P. J., Heffeman, Foster, Russell and Deyo, JJ., concur. [See 272 App. Div. 1098.]
#### Gail L. Barnes, appellee, v. Victoria George, appellant, et al.

Filed April 8, 1898.

No. 7931.

Appeal: Parties: Evidence. There is presented no question on this appeal but the sufficiency of the evidence to sustain the judgment of the district court as to a single one of three defendants, and as the rights of the sole appellant are dependent upon those of the defendants who have not appealed, the judgment- is affirmed.

Appeal from the district court of Lancaster county. Heard below before Tibbets, J.

*Affirmed.*

*J. L. Caldwell,*for appellant.

*F. M.*Hall, *contra.*

Ryan, C.

In the petition filed in the district court of Lancaster county by Gail L. Barnes there were joined as defendants Victoria George, William Elwood, and May E. Elwood. There was a decree as prayed and a brief has been filed by Victoria George alone. The object of plaintiff’s petition was to have subjected to the payment of a judgment in her favor, against Victoria George, certain land, which, before the rendition of said judgment, had been fraudulently conveyed by Victoria George to her co-defendants. Incidentally it was alleged that the grantees of Victoria George, when they received the conveyance just alluded to, had executed to her a mortgage on.the property conveyed, and that both the conveyance and the mortgage were made for the purpose of defrauding the creditors of Victoria George, of whom plaintiff was one. There was a prayer that Victoria George might be enjoined from disposing of said mortgage and for general equitable relief. On the trial it was disclosed that William and May E. Elwood were the parents of Victoria George. One J. W. George, a brother-in-law of Victoria *505George, was the only witness who testified on behalf of defendants, and his testimony went no further than the statement that the proceeds of the mortgage in question had been used by Victoria George in paying her debts. There was no testimony as to the history of the conveyance of the real property by her, neither was there any evidence as to the purpose for which such conveyance was made. There was no evidence explanatory of the giving of the mortgage to her by her parents. By failing to ask relief as appellants the grantees have relieved us of the necessity of inquiring into the *bona fides*of the conveyance by which they held title, and with regard to the regularity of the proceedings by which such title was decreed to be held subject to the rights of plaintiff. The relief decreed against Victoria George was confined to directing a sale of the real property which she had previously conveyed and was incidental to that decreed as against her parents. The district court, we must therefore assume, was justified in granting against Victoria George the relief which was granted, and its judgment in that regard is

Affirmed.
(No. 6706

#### Willa Mae Austin, Claimant, *vs.*State of Illinois, Department of Mental Health, Respondent.

*Opinion filed October 10, 1972.*

*77Kleiman, Cornfield & Feldman, Attorney for Claimant.

William J. Scott, Attorney General; Saul R. Wexler, Assistant Attorney General, for Respondent.

Perlin, C.J.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY ELEV

 220.68

 219.57

 219.76

 219.89

 220.96

 221.93

 221.26

 220.66

 220.77

 221.73

 222.40

 222.47

 223.86

 222.20

 221.55

 222.23

 223.14

 223.79

 223.81

 223.07

 223.30

 221.23

 221.82

 221.65

 221.62

 222.11

 222.10

 221.49

 220.55

 220.36

 221.53

 44,923

 42,042

 42,531

 42,867

 45,656

 48,203

 46,442

 44,870

 45,158

 47,677

 49,447

 49,634

 53,350

 48,916

 47,204

 48,995

 51,420

 53,162

 53,216

 51,233

 51,848

 46,364

 47,914

 47,467

 47,388

 48,677

 48,650

 47,046

 44,583

 44,088

 47,152

STORAGE

-2,912

-2,881

+489

+336

+2,789

+2,547

-1,761

-1,572

+288

+2,519

+1,770

+187

+3,716

-4,434

-1,712

+1,791

+2,425

+1,742

+54

-1,983

+615

-5,484

+1,550

-447

-79

+1,289

-27

-1,604

-2,463

-495

+3,064

CHANGE

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

675

107

461

977

1,304

275

548

744

749

584

2,201

2,339

2,289

2,322

2,430

324

0

0

49

PUMPING

 7,774

 7,813

 7,780

 7,195

 5,727

 6,283

 7,743

 7,594

 7,590

 6,927

 6,483

 4,784

 5,789

 7,421

 7,386

 6,939

 6,401

 5,424

 3,734

 3,894

 4,781

 5,382

 5,412

 5,611

 4,757

 3,206

 3,646

 4,856

 5,643

 6,171

 6,006

PUMPING

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 142

 425

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

PUMPING

 1,250

 1,496

 1,454

 1,405

 1,224

 1,246

 1,414

 1,591

 1,745

 1,808

 1,592

 1,140

 120

 48

 22

 0

 0

 110

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

GEN.

*

-324

-236

-103

-295

-160

-15

-172

-260

-157

+72

-88

-155

+117

-330

+85

-59

-104

-83

+136

-289

+12

-329

+52

-52

-274

+234

-23

-97

-168

+15

+437

OR

UNITED STATES 

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION

CONSOLIDATED STATE-FEDERAL O'NEILL FOREBAY July 19, 2019

DAILY OPERATIONS

MAY 2019 RUN DATE:

IN LAKE GEN.

ACRE-FEET O'NEILL

RELEASE - C.F.S. 

TOTALS -683 18,378 17,665 567 186,152 -2,613

ACRE-FEET -683 36,453 35,039 1,125 369,232

SUMMARY

 600

RELEASE (ACRE-FEET)

O'NEILL GEN. 35,039

SAN LUIS PUMP 1,125 600

 47,835

DOS AMIGOS PUMP 369,232

DELIVERIES 

S. LUIS O'NEILL

 7,880

 7,880

 7,865

 7,843

 7,822

 7,764

 7,738

 7,743

 8,287

 8,380

 7,715

 5,133

 6,990

 5,457

 5,999

 6,924

 6,425

 4,999

 1,495

 1,252

 2,438

 470

 2,694

 2,586

 2,279

 779

 935

 1,958

 1,884

 3,130

 3,704

 154,448

 306,348

CALIF. DOS AMIGOS

AQUEDUCT

0

212

1,719

1,222

696

1,065

704

908

1,350

1,553

1,341

1,041

0

0

0

0

0

1,221

1,725

1,613

1,893

1,892

1,245

512

422

522

290

1,862

2,686

2,777

3,664

 34,135

 67,707

S. LUIS

DELIV.

GAINS(+)

LOSS(-)

C.F.S.

INFLOW - C.F.S.

STATE OF CALIFORNIA

THE RESOURCES AGENCY

DEPARTMENT OF WATER RESOURCES

STATE WATER PROJECT

TOTAL 405,996

-5,183

* DAILY DEL. FIGURES UNAVAILABLE. TOT. DEL. IS INCLUDED IN COMPUTING MONTHLY TOTALS 

Table 18
Editorial Note on Part 46
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 46 appear by T.D. ATF-457, 66 FR 32220, 32221, June 14, 2001.

§ 46.254 Additional reasons for filing a claim. ( a ) *Manufacturer.* Subparts I and K of part 40 of this chapter prescribe the times, reasons and procedures for filing other claims for refunds.
( b ) *Export warehouse proprietor.* Subpart G of part 44 of this chapter prescribes the time, evidence, and procedures for filing other claims for refunds.
( c ) *Exported taxpaid.* If taxpaid articles are shipped from the United States, the dealer may file a claim for drawback of taxes under subpart K of part 44 of this chapter.
( d ) *Importer.* An importer may follow the procedures for filing a claim as set forth in subpart I of part 41 of this chapter.
Exhibit 3.42.1
 ARTICLES OF INCORPORATION
 OF
 HORIZON SHIPPING ENTERPRISES CORPORATION
 PURSUANT TO THE MARSHALL ISLANDS BUSINESS CORPORATIONS ACT
  A.
    
    The name of the Corporation shall be:
 HORIZON SHIPPING ENTERPRISES CORPORATION
 B.
    
    The purpose of the Corporation is to engage in any lawful act or activity for which corporations
may now or
hereafter be organized under the Marshall Islands Business Corporations Act.C.
    
    The registered address of the Corporation in the Marshall Islands is Trust Company Complex,
Ajeltake Road, Ajeltake Island, Majuro, Marshall Islands MH96960. The name of the Corporations
registered agent at such address is The Trust Company of the Marshall Islands, Inc.D.
    
    The aggregate number of shares of stock that the Corporation
is authorized to issue is Fifty
Thousand (50,000) registered shares with a par value of One US Dollar (US$1.00) per share.E.
    
    The Corporation shall have every power which a Corporation now or hereafter organized under the
Marshall Islands Business Corporations Act may have.F.
    
    The name and address of the incorporator is:
 Name
    

Post Office AddressMajuro Nominees Ltd.
    
    P.O.Box 1405MajuroMarshall Islands




---



##### 



G.
    
    The Board of Directors as well as the shareholders of the Corporation shall have the
authority to adopt, amend or repeal the bylaws of the corporation.H.
    
    Corporate existence shall begin upon filing these Articles of Incorporation with the
Registrar of Corporations as of the filing date stated on these
Articles.IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have executed this instrument on October 12, 2005.
 Majuro Nominees Ltd.
        Incorporatorby:

(-s-)
### §7231a. Definition

For the purpose of this part, the term "magnet school" means a public elementary school, public secondary school, public elementary education center, or public secondary education center that offers a special curriculum capable of attracting substantial numbers of students of different racial backgrounds.

(Pub. L. 89–10, title IV, §4402, formerly title V, §5302, as added Pub. L. 107–110, title V, §501, Jan. 8, 2002, 115 Stat. 1807; renumbered title IV, §4402, Pub. L. 114–95, title IV, §4001(b)(3)(A), (B), (D)(i), Dec. 10, 2015, 129 Stat. 1967.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Prior Provisions

A prior section 4402 of Pub. L. 89–10 was classified to section 3122 of this title, prior to the general amendment of Pub. L. 89–10 by Pub. L. 103–382.
Exhibit 32.2


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

         In connection with the Annual Report of Specialized Health Products
International, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-KSB for the period ending
December 31, 2005 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the
date hereof (the "Report"), I, Keith L. Merrell, Acting Chief Financial Officer
of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to
ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

         (1)      The Report fully complies with the requirements of section
                  13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2)      The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
                  all material respects, the financial condition and result of
                  operations of the Company.

 /s/ Keith L. Merrell
------------------------------
Keith L. Merrell
Acting Chief Financial Officer
March 7, 2006
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 01-6683

SAMUEL WILLIAMS FEREBEE, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus JERRY G. MONETTE; GEORGE L. ADKINS; ELLA BULLOCK, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Joseph C. Howard, District Judge. (CA-00-87-5-H) Submitted: October 24, 2001 Decided: November 15, 2001 Before LUTTIG, KING, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Marvin R. Sparrow, SPARROW & VANDENBERG, Durham, North Carolina, for Appellant. Scott C. Hart, SUMRELL, SUGG, CARMICHAEL, HICKS & HART, P.A., New Bern, North Carolina, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM:Samuel Williams Ferebee appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C.A. § 1983 (West Supp. 2001) complaint. We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Ferebee v. Monette , No. CA-00-87-5-H (E.D.N.C. filed Mar.14, 2001; entered Mar. 15, 2001). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
#### Western New York Institution for Deaf-Mutes, Respondent, v. County of Broome, Appellant.

Motion granted and appeal dismissed, with costs.
Editorial Note on Part 27
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 27 appear by T.D. ATF-474, 67 FR 11231, Mar. 13, 2002, and T.D. ATF-479, 67 FR 30799, May 8, 2002.

§ 27.136 Filing. ( a ) All records and reports required by this part will be maintained separately, by transaction or reporting date, at the importer's place of business. The appropriate TTB officer may, pursuant to an application, authorize files, or an individual file, to be maintained at another business location under the control of the importer, if the alternative location does not cause undue inconvenience to appropriate TTB officers desiring to examine the files or delay in the timely submission of documents, and are not inconsistent with customs recordkeeping requirements (See 19 CFR part 163).
( b ) If an importer conducts wholesale operations, one legible copy of each required record of receipt and disposition shall be filed not later than one business day following the date of transaction.
( c ) If an importer conducts only retail operations, they may maintain either loose-leaf or book records of the daily receipt of liquors which contain all the required information.
( d ) Supporting documents, such as consignors' invoices, delivery receipts, bills of lading, etc., or exact copies of the same, may be filed in accordance with the importer's regular accounting and recordkeeping practices.
(Approved by the Office of Management and Budget under control number 1512-0352) (Sec. 201, Pub. L. 85-859, 72 Stat. 1342, as amended, 1395, as amended (26 U.S.C. 5114, 5555))
[T.D. ATF-116, 47 FR 51573, Nov. 16, 1982, as amended by T.D. ATF-172, 49 FR 14943, Apr. 16, 1984; T.D. ATF-474, 67 FR 11232, Mar. 13, 2002]
###### Editorial Note on Part 20

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 20 appear by T.D. ATF-235, 66 FR 5473, Jan. 19, 2001, and T.D. ATF-463 and T.D. ATF-462, 66 FR 42733, 42736, Aug. 15, 2001.

#### § 20.243 Procurement of specially denatured spirits.

Government agencies shall retain the original permit, Form 5150.33, on file. When placing an initial order with a vendor, the agency shall forward a photocopy of its permit with the purchase order for specially denatured spirits. In the case of an agency holding a single permit for use of other sub-agencies, the photocopy of the permit will contain an attachment listing all other locations authorized to procure specially denatured spirits. Any subsequent purchases from the same vendor need only contain the permit number on the purchase order.