alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

DAY ELEV

 583.20

 581.61

 581.86

 581.76

 582.62

 583.85

 584.30

 585.28

 584.11

 583.50

 583.36

 583.42

 583.17

 583.61

 584.08

 583.64

 582.98

 584.23

 585.31

 585.58

 585.92

 584.98

 584.12

 585.38

 584.48

 582.30

 581.46

 582.12

 582.90

 581.52

 21,404

 20,457

 20,604

 20,545

 21,056

 21,799

 22,075

 22,683

 21,958

 21,587

 21,502

 21,538

 21,386

 21,653

 21,939

 21,671

 21,271

 22,032

 22,702

 22,871

 23,085

 22,495

 21,964

 22,746

 22,186

 20,865

 20,370

 20,758

 21,223

 20,405

STORAGE

-1,254

-947

+147

-59

+511

+743

+276

+608

-725

-371

-85

+36

-152

+267

+286

-268

-400

+761

+670

+169

+214

-590

-531

+782

-560

-1,321

-495

+388

+465

-818

CHANGE

6,199

6,352

6,902

6,779

7,061

7,182

7,005

7,169

6,459

6,649

6,784

6,847

6,746

6,958

6,974

6,690

6,624

7,212

7,181

6,915

6,967

6,554

6,543

7,199

6,522

6,173

6,595

7,124

7,202

6,487

INFLOW

 6,826

 6,824

 6,823

 6,805

 6,798

 6,801

 6,860

 6,856

 6,821

 6,833

 6,824

 6,824

 6,818

 6,817

 6,824

 6,820

 6,821

 6,822

 6,843

 6,830

 6,852

 4,821

 3,440

 6,799

 6,799

 6,835

 6,786

 6,928

 6,964

 6,895

POWER

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 2,024

 3,368

 0

 0

 0

 56

 0

 0

 0

SPILL

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

FISHTRAP

 5

 5

 5

 4

 5

 6

 6

 6

 4

 3

 3

 5

 5

 6

 6

 5

 5

 6

 0

 0

 7

 6

 3

 6

 5

 4

 3

 0

 4

 4

C.F.S.

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

SEPTEMBER 2021 KESWICK RESERVOIR DAILY OPERATIONS RUN DATE: October 1, 2021

RES.

EVAP

C.F.S.

COMPUTED*

ACRE-FEET

RELEASE - C.F.S. 

TOTALS -2,253 204,054 199,609 5,448 0 132

ACRE-FEET -2,253 404,741 395,924 10,806 0 262

SUMMARY

RELEASE (ACRE-FEET)

POWER 395,924

SPILL 10,806

 22,658

FISH TRAP 0

SPRING

CR. P. P.

RELEASE (1)

 1,022

 889

 949

 1,093

 1,036

 1,034

 1,062

 1,114

 1,080

 1,087

 1,072

 1,786

 1,803

 1,795

 1,668

 1,688

 1,697

 1,733

 1,680

 1,712

 1,861

 2,090

 1,729

 1,845

 1,755

 1,750

 1,765

 1,669

 1,772

 1,733

 44,969

 89,196

*COMPUTED INFLOW IS SUM OF CHANGE IN STORAGE, RELEASES, AND EVAPORATION.

(1) EVAPORATION RECORDS TAKEN FROM SHASTA PAN.

SHASTA

RELEASE

C.F.S

 4,786

 5,123

 5,609

 5,348

 5,686

 5,683

 5,635

 5,686

 5,058

 5,186

 5,311

 4,718

 4,632

 4,821

 4,925

 4,605

 4,614

 5,157

 5,204

 4,561

 4,743

 4,151

 4,574

 4,933

 4,345

 4,002

 4,537

 5,024

 4,980

 4,353

 147,990

 293,538
[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 72 (Thursday, April 14, 2011)]
[Notices]
[Pages 20948-20949]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2011-8954]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

Bureau of Industry and Security


Sensors and Instrumentation Technical Advisory Committee; Notice 
of Partially Closed Meeting

    The Sensors and Instrumentation Technical Advisory Committee 
(SITAC) will meet on May 3, 2011, 9:30 a.m., in the Herbert C. Hoover 
Building, Room 3884, 14th Street between Constitution and Pennsylvania 
Avenues, NW., Washington, DC. The Committee advises the Office of the 
Assistant Secretary for Export Administration on technical questions 
that affect the level of export controls applicable to sensors

[[Page 20949]]

and instrumentation equipment and technology.

Agenda

Public Session

    1. Welcome and Introductions.
    2. Remarks from the Bureau of Industry and Security Management.
    3. Industry Presentations.
    4. New Business.

Closed Session

    5. Discussion of matters determined to be exempt from the 
provisions relating to public meetings found in 5 U.S.C. app. 2 
Sec. Sec.  10(a)(1) and 10(a)(3).
    The open session will be accessible via teleconference to 20 
participants on a first come, first serve basis. To join the 
conference, submit inquiries to Ms. Yvette Springer at 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#28715b585a41464f4d5a684a415b064c474b064f475e"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="8bd2f8fbf9e2e5eceef9cbe9e2f8a5efe4e8a5ece4fd">[email protected]</span></a> no later than April 26, 2011.
    A limited number of seats will be available during the public 
session of the meeting. Reservations are not accepted. To the extent 
that time permits, members of the public may present oral statements to 
the Committee. The public may submit written statements at any time 
before or after the meeting. However, to facilitate distribution of 
public presentation materials to the Committee members, the Committee 
suggests that the materials be forwarded before the meeting to Ms. 
Springer.
    The Assistant Secretary for Administration, with the concurrence of 
the General Counsel, formally determined on December 14, 2010 pursuant 
to Section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as amended (5 
U.S.C. app. 2 Sec.  10(d)), that the portion of this meeting dealing 
with pre-decisional changes to the Commerce Control List and U.S. 
export control policies shall be exempt from the provisions relating to 
public meetings found in 5 U.S.C. app. 2 Sec. Sec.  10(a)(1) and 
10(a)(3). The remaining portions of the meeting will be open to the 
public.
    For more information contact Yvette Springer on (202) 482-2813.


    Dated: April 8, 2011.
Yvette Springer,
Committee Liaison Officer.
[FR Doc. 2011-8954 Filed 4-13-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-JT-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
§ 270.30 What conditions must be met by a recipient of a grant? ( a ) A recipient of a grant under this part must: ( 1 ) Operate an EAC in the geographic region to be served; and
( 2 ) Have a full-time project director.
( b ) A recipient of a grant under this part must coordinate assistance in its geographic region with appropriate SEAs, Comprehensive Centers, Regional Educational Laboratories, and other Federal technical assistance centers. As part of this coordination, the recipient shall seek to prevent duplication of assistance where an SEA, Comprehensive Center, Regional Educational Laboratory, or other Federal technical assistance center may have already provided assistance to the responsible governmental agency.
( c ) A recipient of a grant under this part must communicate and coordinate with the most recent EAC grant recipient(s) in its region, as needed, to ensure a smooth transition for ongoing technical assistance under the EAC program.
###### Editorial Note on Part 41

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 41 (formerly part 275) appear at T.D. ATF-460, 66 FR 39093, July 27, 2001.

#### §§ 41.135-41.138 [Reserved]
#### William Youngs, Respondent, v. Syracuse, Binghamton and New York Railroad Company, Appellant.

Judgment and order affirmed, with costs. All concurred, except Smith, P. J., not voting.
**EXHIBIT32**

 

**CERTIFICATIONOF 10-Q REPORT**

**OF**

**CROWNMEDIA HOLDINGS, INC.**

 

**FORTHE QUARTER ENDED MARCH 31, 2008**

 

# **1.**     Theundersigned are the Chief Executive Officer and the Chief Financial Officer ofCrown Media Holdings, Inc. (“Crown Media Holdings”).  This Certification is made pursuant to Section 906of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.  ThisCertification accompanies the 10-Q Report of Crown Media Holdings for thequarter ended March 31, 2008.

 

# **2.**     Wecertify that such 10-Q Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the informationcontained in such 10-Q Report fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and results of operations of Crown Media Holdings.

 

This Certification isexecuted as of May 7, 2008.

 

 
|   | /s/ HENRY S.  SCHLEIFF                     |
|--------|--------------------------------------------|
|   | Henry S.  Schleiff, President and          |
|   | Chief Executive  Officer                   |
|   |                                       |
|   |                                       |
|   | /s/ BRIAN C.  STEWART                      |
|   | Brian C.  Stewart, Chief Financial Officer |

 

1

----
###### Editorial Note on Part 40

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 40 appear by T.D. ATF-460, 66 FR 39094-39096, July 27, 2001; T.D. ATF-464, 66 FR 43479, Aug. 20, 2001; and T.D. TTB-91, 76 FR 5479, Feb. 1, 2011.

#### § 40.27 Assessment.

Whenever any person required by law to pay tax on tobacco products fails to pay such tax, the tax shall be ascertained and assessed against such person, subject to the limitations prescribed in 26 U.S.C. 6501. The tax so assessed shall be in addition to the penalties imposed by law for failure to pay such tax when required. Except in cases where delay may jeopardize collection of the tax, or where the amount is nominal or the result of an evident mathematical error, no such assessment shall be made until and after notice has been afforded such person to show cause against assessment. The person will be allowed 45 days from the date of such notice to show cause, in writing, against such assessment.

(Sec. 201, Pub. L. 85-859, 72 Stat. 1415, as amended (26 U.S.C. 5703))

[T.D. 6871, 31 FR 32, Jan. 4, 1966. Redesignated at 40 FR 16835, Apr. 15, 1975, and amended by T.D. ATF-48, 44 FR 55854, Sept. 28, 1979; T.D. ATF-232, 51 FR 28080, Aug. 5, 1986; T.D. ATF-243, 52 FR 43194, Dec. 1, 1986]
###### Editorial Note on Part 46

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 46 appear by T.D. ATF-457, 66 FR 32220, 32221, June 14, 2001.

#### § 46.137 Time limit on filing of claim for refund.

No claim for the refund of a special tax or penalty will be allowed unless presented within 3 years after the filing of the related tax return or within 2 years after the payment of such tax or penalty, whichever of these periods expires later.

(26 U.S.C. 6511)
###### Editorial Note on Part 44

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 44 appear by T.D. ATF-464, 66 FR 43480, Aug. 20, 2001, and T.D. ATF-480, 67 FR 30801-30803, May 8, 2002.

#### § 44.188 General.

Tobacco products, and cigarette papers and tubes transferred or removed from a factory or an export warehouse, under this part, without payment of tax, shall be consigned as required by this subpart.

(72 Stat. 1418, as amended; 26 U.S.C. 5704)

[T.D. 6871, 31 FR 52, Jan. 4, 1966. Redesignated at 40 FR 16835, Apr. 15, 1975, and amended by T.D. ATF-232, 51 FR 28088, Aug. 5, 1986; T.D. ATF-243, 51 FR 43194, Dec. 1, 1986]
###### Editorial Note on Part 40

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 40 appear by T.D. ATF-460, 66 FR 39094-39096, July 27, 2001; T.D. ATF-464, 66 FR 43479, Aug. 20, 2001; and T.D. TTB-91, 76 FR 5479, Feb. 1, 2011.

#### § 40.91 Change in individual name.

Where there is a change in the name of an individual operating as a manufacturer of tobacco products he shall, within 30 days of such change, make application on Form 2098 for an amended permit.

(72 Stat. 1421; 26 U.S.C. 5712)

[26 FR 8174, Aug. 31, 1961. Redesignated at 40 FR 16835, Apr. 15, 1975; 54 FR 48839, Nov. 27, 1989; and further redesignated by T.D. ATF-460, 66 FR 39093, July 27, 2001, as amended by T.D. TTB-91, 76 FR 5480, Feb. 1, 2011]
###### Editorial Note on Part 41

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 41 (formerly part 275) appear at T.D. ATF-460, 66 FR 39093, July 27, 2001.

#### § 41.163 Refund of tax.

The taxes paid on tobacco products and cigarette papers and tubes imported or brought into the United States may be refunded (without interest) to the taxpayer on proof satisfactory to the appropriate TTB officer that the taxpayer has paid the tax on tobacco products and cigarette papers and tubes lost (otherwise than by theft) or destroyed, by fire, casualty, or act of God, while in the possession or ownership of such taxpayer, or withdrawn by him from the market. Any claim for refund of tax under this section shall be prepared on Form 2635 (5620.8), in duplicate, and shall include a statement that the tax imposed on tobacco products and cigarette papers and tubes by 26 U.S.C. 7652 or chapter 52, as applicable, has been paid in respect to the articles covered in the claim, and that the articles were lost, destroyed, or withdrawn from the market, within six months preceding the date the claim is filed and shall be executed under the penalties of perjury. A claim for refund relating to articles lost or destroyed shall be supported as prescribed in § 41.165, and a claim relating to articles withdrawn from the market shall include a schedule prepared and verified as prescribed in §§ 41.170 and 41.171 or §§ 41.172 and 41.173. The original of the claim shall be filed with the appropriate TTB officer. The duplicate of the claim, with the copy of any verified supporting schedules, shall be retained by the claimant.

(68A Stat. 907, as amended, 72 Stat. 1419, as amended; 26 U.S.C. 7652, 5705)

[T.D. 6871, 31 FR 46, Jan. 4, 1966. Redesignated at 40 FR 16835, Apr. 15, 1975, and amended by T.D. ATF-48, 44 FR 55855, Sept. 28, 1979; T.D. ATF-232, 51 FR 28086, Aug. 5, 1986; T.D. ATF-243, 52 FR 43194, Dec. 1, 1986; T.D. ATF-251, 52 FR 19341, May 22, 1987. Redesignated and amended by T.D. TTB-16, 69 FR 52424, 52425, Aug. 26, 2004]
Exhibit 99.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Consolidated Resources Health Care
Fund II (the "Partnership") on Form 10-Q for the period ending June 30, 2001 as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
"Report"), I, John F. McMullan, Principal Executive Officer and Chief Financial
Officer of the Partnership, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss.1350, as adopted
pursuant to ss.906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

         (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934;
and

         (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and result of the operations of the
Partnership.



Date:    April 22, 2003             By:  /s/ John F. McMullan
                                         ---------------------------------
                                         John F. McMullan
                                         Chief Financial Officer (chief
                                         executive and chief financial
                                         officer of the Partnership)
```

[Congressional Bills 114th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 3726 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

114th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 3726

  To amend title 23, United States Code, to authorize States to issue 
  special permits to allow the operation of vehicles of up to 95,000 
   pounds on Interstate System highways for the hauling of livestock.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            October 8, 2015

Mr. Rooney of Florida introduced the following bill; which was referred 
         to the Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To amend title 23, United States Code, to authorize States to issue 
  special permits to allow the operation of vehicles of up to 95,000 
   pounds on Interstate System highways for the hauling of livestock.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Highway Exceptions for Ranchers' 
Deliveries Act of 2015''.

SEC. 2. VEHICLE WEIGHT LIMITATIONS FOR INTERSTATE SYSTEM HIGHWAYS.

    Section 127(a) of title 23, United States Code, is amended by 
adding at the end the following:
            ``(13) Hauling of livestock.--A State may allow, by special 
        permit, the operation of vehicles with a gross vehicle weight 
        of up to 95,000 pounds for the hauling of livestock. The cost 
        of a special permit issued under this paragraph may not exceed 
        $200 per year for a livestock trailer.''.
                                 <all>
```
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY ELEV

 429.36

 429.08

 428.80

 428.43

 428.01

 427.69

 427.37

 427.05

 426.82

 426.57

 426.32

 426.11

 425.92

 425.68

 425.40

 425.14

 424.84

 424.53

 424.15

 423.82

 423.55

 423.30

 423.08

 422.87

 422.71

 422.47

 422.36

 422.38

 422.37

 422.35

 422.26

 608.0

 605.5

 603.0

 599.7

 596.0

 593.2

 590.4

 587.6

 585.6

 583.4

 581.3

 579.5

 577.8

 575.7

 573.3

 571.1

 568.5

 565.9

 562.6

 559.8

 557.6

 555.4

 553.6

 551.8

 550.5

 548.5

 547.5

 547.7

 547.6

 547.5

 546.7

STORAGE

-2.4

-2.5

-2.5

-3.3

-3.7

-2.8

-2.8

-2.8

-2.0

-2.2

-2.2

-1.8

-1.6

-2.1

-2.4

-2.2

-2.6

-2.6

-3.2

-2.8

-2.3

-2.1

-1.9

-1.8

-1.3

-2.0

-0.9

+0.2

-0.1

-0.2

-0.8

CHANGE

1,527

1,628

1,635

980

904

1,347

978

1,055

1,467

1,329

1,326

1,468

1,547

1,308

1,216

1,317

1,040

994

955

893

1,018

1,114

1,151

1,069

1,172

769

1,310

1,977

1,815

1,930

1,960

INFLOW

 2,358

 2,559

 2,499

 2,328

 2,417

 2,421

 2,019

 2,009

 2,007

 2,026

 2,013

 1,975

 1,991

 1,983

 1,997

 2,067

 1,995

 2,064

 2,071

 2,011

 1,853

 1,837

 1,719

 1,625

 1,487

 1,439

 1,401

 1,470

 1,428

 1,589

 1,966

POWER

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

SPILL

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

OUTLET

 284

 278

 273

 266

 267

 271

 278

 280

 291

 290

 294

 296

 287

 265

 284

 280

 258

 255

 264

 235

 245

 267

 248

 245

 257

 268

 259

 264

 257

 254

 262

PUMPING

 95

 47

 112

 32

 88

 67

 93

 178

 177

 107

 113

 116

 98

 101

 150

 98

 83

 9

 254

 60

 71

 76

 122

 90

 104

 76

 115

 158

 172

 172

 112

C.F.S.

 .32

 .16

 .38

 .11

 .30

 .23

 .32

 .61

 .61

 .37

 .39

 .40

 .34

 .35

 .52

 .34

 .29

 .03

 .89

 .21

 .25

 .27

 .43

 .32

 .37

 .27

 .41

 .56

 .61

 .61

 .40

INCHES

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

PRECIP

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

AUGUST 2002 FOLSOM LAKE DAILY OPERATIONS RUN DATE: September 23, 2002

IN LAKE

EVAPORATION

INCHES

C.F.S. PLANT

COMPUTED*

1000 ACRE-FEET

RELEASE - C.F.S. 

 RIVER 

TOTALS -63.7 40,199 60,624 0 0 8,322 3,346 11.67 .00

ACRE-FEET -63,700 79,735 120,248 0 0 16,507 6,637

COMMENTS:

* COMPUTED INFLOW IS THE SUM OF CHANGE IN STORAGE, RELEASES, PUMPING AND EVAPORATION.

SUMMARY

RELEASE (ACRE-FEET)

POWER 120,248

SPILL

PUMPING PLANT

 0

 16,507

TOTAL 136,755

PRECIPITATION

THIS MONTH =

JULY 1, 2002 TO DATE = .00

 610.4

OUTLET 0 .00

Table 11
IN THE COMMONWEALTH COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

Seguro Medico, LLC and Arthur :

Wayne Walsh, :

Petitioners :

:

v. : No. 293 M.D. 2023

:

Michael Humphreys, in his official :

capacity as Acting Commissioner of :

the Pennsylvania Department of :

Insurance, David Buono, in his official :

capacity as Acting Deputy Insurance :

Commissioner, Michael Fissel, in his :

official capacity as the Chief of the :

Department of Insurance Field :

Investigations/Enforcement Bureau, :

and the Commonwealth of :

Pennsylvania Department of Insurance, :

Respondents :

PER CURIAM O R D E R

NOW, February 1 , 2024

, upon consideration of P etitioner s ’

application for re argument , the application is DENIED

.
#### § 5.73 Treatment of whisky or brandy with wood.

The words “colored and flavored with wood____ ” (inserting “chips,” “slabs,” etc., as appropriate) must appear immediately adjacent to, and in the same size of type as, the class and type designation under subpart I of this part for whisky and brandy treated, in whole or in part, with wood through percolation or otherwise during distillation or storage, other than through contact with an oak barrel. However, the statement specified in this section is not required in the case of brandy treated with an infusion of oak chips in accordance with § 5.155(b)(3)(B).
(No. 78-CC-0400

#### Donald Leroy Holland, Claimant, *v.*State of Illinois, Respondent.

*Order filed March 20, 1978.*

Per Curiam.

Claimant, an inmate of an Illinois penal institution, has brought this action to recover the value of certain items of personal property of which he was allegedly possessed while incarcerated. Claimant contends that his property was lost, misplaced, stolen or destroyed while he was imprisoned, and that the loss of his property was proximately caused by the negligence of employees of the State of Illinois.

In *Bargas v. State, 32*Ill.Ct.Cl.__, this Court held that the State of Illinois does not owe a duty to inmates *281of its penal institutions to safeguard property which inmates keep in their cells. In the companion case of *Doubling v. State, 32 Ill.Ct.Cl.1,*we further held that only where the State takes actual physical possession of the property of an inmate, as during the course of his transfer between penal institutions, does a duty arise to use reasonable care in protecting the inmate’s property.

The complaint in this action does not allege that Claimant’s property was delivered to agents of the State, but rather that the property disappeared or was damaged in Claimant’s cell. Under our reasoning in *Bargas v. State, supra,*and *Doubling v. State, supra,*the complaint herein fails to state a claim upon which relief can be granted.

It is therefore ordered that this cause be, and hereby is, dismissed.
###### Editorial Note on Part 555

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 555 appear by T.D. ATF-487, 68 FR 3748, Jan. 24, 2003.

#### § 555.31 Inspection of site accidents or fires; right of entry.

Any ATF officer may inspect the site of any accident or fire in which there is reason to believe that explosive materials were involved. Any ATF officer may enter into or upon any property where explosive materials have been used, are suspected of having been used, or have been found in an otherwise unauthorized location.
### subpart 2—state provisions