alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32.1





Certification


Pursuant to Section 906 Of The Sarbanes-Oxley Act Of 2002


(Chapter 63, Title 18 U.S.C.  Section 1350(A) And (B))





Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (Chapter 63, Title 18 U.S.C. Section 1350(a) and (b)), the undersigned hereby certifies in his capacity as an officer of XOMA Ltd. (the “Company”) that the Annual Report of the Company on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2009, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and that the information contained in such report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company at the end of and for the periods covered by such Report.





Date:  April 30, 2010

/s/    STEVEN B. ENGLE

Steven B.  Engle

Chairman, Chief Executive Officer and President





This certification will not be deemed filed for purposes of Section 18 of the Exchange Act (15 U.S.C. 78), or otherwise subject to the liability of that section.  Such certification will not be deemed to be incorporated by reference into any filing under the Securities Act or the Exchange Act, except to the extent that the registrant specifically incorporates it by reference.
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Jaime OLVERA-VALDOVINOS, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 04-41744.

Conference Calendar.

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.

Decided Feb. 24, 2006.

James Lee Turner, Assistant U.S. Attorney, U.S. Attorney’s Office Southern District of Texas, Houston, TX, for PlaintiffAppellee.

Marjorie A Meyers, Federal Public Defender, Raquel Kathy Wilson, Assistant Federal Public Defender, Federal Public Defender’s Office Southern District of Texas, Houston, TX, Jaime Olvera-Valdovinos, Federal Correctional Institution, Three Rivers, TX, for Defendant-Appellant.

Before GARZA, DENNIS, and PRADO, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: *

The Federal Public Defender representing Jaime Olvera-Valdovinos has moved to withdraw and has filed a brief as required by *Anders v. California,*386 U.S. 738, 87 *669S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Olvera-Valdovinos has not filed a response. Our independent review of counsel’s brief and the record discloses no nonfrivolous issue. Accordingly, the motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. *See*5th Cir. R. 42.2.

*

 Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.
* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent

except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.

 ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

 FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

JERRY LEE ZASTERA,

 Petitioner - Appellant,

 v.

FRANK THOMPSON, Superintendent,

Santiam Correctional Institution,

 Respondent - Appellee.

No. 09-36141

D.C. No. 3:08-cv-00434-MA

MEMORANDUM*

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the District of Oregon

Malcolm F. Marsh, Senior District Judge, Presiding

Submitted July 11, 2011** 

Portland, Oregon

Before: GOODWIN, PREGERSON, and M. SMITH, Circuit Judges.

Jerry Lee Zastera petitions for a writ of habeas corpus, contending that the

trial court erred in denying his motion to sever the two cases against him. Because

the parties are familiar with the factual and procedural history of this case, we do

FILED

JUL 13 2011

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
2

not recount additional facts except as necessary to explain our decision. We have

jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. §§ 1291 and 2253. We affirm the judgment of the

district court, and deny the petition. 

Under the Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996, we may

grant habeas relief only if the state court’s decision was (1) “contrary to, or

involved an unreasonable application of, clearly established Federal law, as

determined by the Supreme Court of the United States,” or (2) “based on an

unreasonable determination of the facts in light of the evidence presented in the

State court proceeding.” 28 U.S.C. § 2254(d). The government contends that the

state trial court could not have applied established federal law in an unreasonable

manner, noting that no Supreme Court case has addressed the constitutional

implications of joinder of indictments. Zastera argues, however, that the trial

court’s denial of his motion to sever the two cases against him violated his rights to

a fair trial, see Smith v. Phillips, 455 U.S. 209, 217 (1982), and to testify in his own

defense, see Rock v. Arkansas, 483 U.S. 44, 51 (1987). 

Even applying the legal principles that Zastera advocates, however, the trial

court did not apply clearly established federal law in an unreasonable manner. In

the context of a trial court’s denial of a motion to sever counts in a single

indictment, a trial is unfair “if the impermissible joinder had a substantial and
3

injurious effect or influence in determining the jury’s verdict,” Davis v. Woodford,

384 F.3d 628, 638 (9th Cir. 2004) (citation and internal quotation marks omitted),

and here there is no evidence that the trial court’s denial of the motion to sever

influenced the jury’s verdict. Nor did Zastera make “a convincing showing that he

[had] both important testimony to give concerning one [case] and a strong need to

refrain from testifying on the other.” United States v. Armstrong, 621 F.2d 951,

954 (9th Cir. 1980) (citation and internal quotation marks omitted). 

AFFIRMED.
(No. 7002

#### Walter C. McCrone Associates, Inc., Claimant, *vs.*State of Illinois, Attorney General’s Office, Respondent.

*Opinion filed May 3, 1973.*

Walter C. McCrone Associates, Inc., Claimant, pro se.

William J. Scott, Attorney General; Saul R. Wexler, Assistant Attorney General, for Respondent.

Per Curiam.
Editorial Note on Part 478
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 478 appear by T.D. ATF-411, 64 FR 17291, Apr. 9, 1999, T.D. ATF-487, 68 FR 3750, Jan. 24, 2003, and ATF-11F, 73 FR 57240, Oct. 2, 2008.

§ 478.42 License fees. Each applicant shall pay a fee for obtaining a firearms license or ammunition license, a separate fee being required for each business or collecting activity at each place of such business or activity, as follows: ( a ) For a manufacturer: ( 1 ) Of destructive devices, ammunition for destructive devices or armor piercing ammunition—$1,000 per year.
( 2 ) Of firearms other than destructive devices—$50 per year.
( 3 ) Of ammunition for firearms other than ammunition for destructive devices or armor piercing ammunition—$10 per year.
( b ) For an importer: ( 1 ) Of destructive devices, ammunition for destructive devices or armor piercing ammunition—$1,000 per year.
( 2 ) Of firearms other than destructive devices or ammunition for firearms other than destructive devices or ammunition other than armor piercing ammunition—$50 per year.
( c ) For a dealer: ( 1 ) In destructive devices—$1,000 per year.
( 2 ) Who is not a dealer in destructive devices—$200 for 3 years, except that the fee for renewal of a valid license shall be $90 for 3 years.
( d ) For a collector of curios and relics—$10 per year.
[T.D. ATF-270, 53 FR 10494, Mar. 31, 1988, as amended by T.D. ATF-354, 59 FR 7112, Feb. 14, 1994]
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY HIGH

 961

 954

 943

 850

 805

 765

 770

 740

 733

 716

 690

 653

 626

 593

 567

 537

 502

 482

 473

 462

 442

 435

 423

 422

 411

 400

 403

 395

 393

 383

 378

 771

 800

 781

 657

 694

 685

 683

 672

 578

 626

 628

 575

 557

 536

 499

 481

 443

 425

 432

 431

 405

 398

 394

 379

 371

 364

 368

 367

 360

 363

 359

 848

 848

 832

 764

 728

 720

 712

 698

 678

 663

 649

 623

 597

 570

 547

 517

 487

 467

 454

 442

 425

 417

 409

 400

 392

 386

 386

 380

 375

 371

 368

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

JANUARY 2008 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: February 4, 2008

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

HOLLAND TRACT ON OLD RIVER
#### Herman Weiss, Appellant, v. Martin Weiss et al., Respondents.

Hagarty, Johnston, Adel, Taylor and Lewis, JJ., concur.
```

[Congressional Bills 116th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 5597 Engrossed in House (EH)]

<DOC>
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
116th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 5597

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
at 305 Northwest 5th Street in Oklahoma City, Oklahoma, as the ``Clara 
                     Luper Post Office Building''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. CLARA LUPER POST OFFICE BUILDING.

    (a) Designation.--The facility of the United States Postal Service 
located at 305 Northwest 5th Street in Oklahoma City, Oklahoma, shall 
be known and designated as the ``Clara Luper Post Office Building''.
    (b) References.--Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, 
paper, or other record of the United States to the facility referred to 
in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``Clara 
Luper Post Office Building''.

            Passed the House of Representatives September 14, 2020.

            Attest:

                                                                 Clerk.
116th CONGRESS

  2d Session

                               H. R. 5597

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
at 305 Northwest 5th Street in Oklahoma City, Oklahoma, as the ``Clara 
                     Luper Post Office Building''.
```
A-AA+Skip to content

                  - Home
                  - Compendium Statistics
                  - Event
                  - Archives
                  - Glossary
                  - Help
                  - Contact
                  - Research on Disability

Annual Disability Statistics Compendium

              - Home /
              - Archives /
              - 2012 Compendium Statistics /
              - 2012 Social Security Administration Programs /
              - 2012 9.7 Social Security Disability Insurance and Supplemental Security Income—Number of Total and Concurrent Beneficiaries, Age 18-64

## Table 9.7: Social Security Disability Insurance and Supplemental Security Income—Number of Total and Concurrent Beneficiaries, Ages 18 to 64: December 2010

----

----

 

----

#### 2012 Disability Compendium

                        - Home
                        - Compendium Statistics                           - Population and Prevelance
                          - Employment
                          - Time Trend Population Statistics
                          - Poverty
                          - Earnings
                          - Veterans
                          - Health Insurance Coverage
                          - Health
                          - Social Security Administration Programs
                          - Medicaid and Medicare
                          - Special Education
                          - Vocational Rehabilitation
                          - Federal Government Spending and Employment
                          - International Disability Statistics
                          - Population Statistics: Disability Type
                        - Event
                        - Archives                           - 2012 Compendium Statistics
                        - Glossary
                        - Help
                        - Contact
                        - Research on Disability

#### Funding for this project is made possible by:

 The Research and Training Center on Disability Statistics and Demographics (StatsRRTC), which is funded by the U.S. Department of Education, National Institute for Disability and Rehabilitation Research, under cooperative agreements H133B080012.

#### Stay Connected

**Institute on Disability**10 West Edge Drive, Suite 101Durham, NH 03824603.862.4320 | relay: 711 | [email protected]www.iod.unh.edu

© 2013. Institute on Disability.University of New Hampshire.
[KPMG Peat Marwick LLP Letterhead]


                         Consent of Independent Auditors



The Board of Directors and Shareholders
Eagle Financial Corp.:

We consent to incorporation by reference in the registration  statements on Form
S-8 (No.  33-28403) and Form S-8 (No.  33-46092) of Eagle Financial Corp. of our
report dated October 27, 1997,  relating to the  consolidated  balance sheets of
Eagle  Financial  Corp. and  Subsidiaries as of September 30, 1997 and 1996, and
the related consolidated  statements of income,  shareholders'  equity, and cash
flows for each of the years in the three-year  period ended  September 30, 1997,
which report  appears in the  September  30, 1997 annual  report on Form 10-K of
Eagle Financial Corp.

Our report refers to a change in method of accounting for investment  securities
in 1995.


KPMG PEAT MARWICK LLP


/s/  KPMG Peat Marwick LLP


Hartford, Connecticut
December 29, 1997
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

DAY ELEV

 122.95

 122.45

 122.84

 122.48

 122.54

 122.22

 122.98

 122.88

 122.96

 122.99

 123.40

 123.82

 124.01

 124.00

 123.88

 123.55

 123.35

 123.86

 124.13

 124.32

 124.03

 123.87

 123.65

 124.21

 124.60

 124.29

 124.15

 124.21

 123.57

 123.93

 7,769

 7,544

 7,719

 7,557

 7,584

 7,440

 7,782

 7,737

 7,773

 7,787

 7,979

 8,176

 8,266

 8,261

 8,205

 8,050

 7,956

 8,195

 8,326

 8,421

 8,276

 8,200

 8,097

 8,366

 8,561

 8,406

 8,336

 8,366

 8,059

 8,228

STORAGE

+167

-225

+175

-162

+27

-144

+342

-45

+36

+14

+192

+197

+90

-5

-56

-155

-94

+239

+131

+95

-145

-76

-103

+269

+195

-155

-70

+30

-307

+169

CHANGE

1,885

1,681

1,891

1,720

1,815

1,723

2,159

2,280

2,296

2,298

2,417

2,432

2,380

2,317

2,283

2,234

2,511

2,676

2,611

2,596

2,479

2,500

2,490

2,676

2,645

2,462

2,508

2,554

2,392

3,128

INFLOW

 1,696

 1,688

 1,698

 1,702

 1,695

 1,687

 1,874

 2,189

 2,163

 2,178

 2,206

 2,219

 2,221

 2,205

 2,195

 2,197

 2,430

 2,441

 2,431

 2,434

 2,438

 2,425

 2,433

 2,431

 2,437

 2,430

 2,432

 2,429

 2,438

 2,934

POWER

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 2

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 12

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

SPILL

 60

 60

 60

 60

 60

 60

 60

 60

 60

 60

 60

 60

 60

 60

 60

 60

 60

 60

 60

 60

 60

 60

 60

 60

 60

 60

 60

 60

 60

 60

HATCHERY

 5

 6

 5

 0

 4

 4

 5

 4

 3

 3

 4

 4

 4

 5

 6

 5

 6

 5

 4

 4

 4

 4

 4

 4

 5

 5

 6

 5

 4

 4

C.F.S.

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

JUNE 2004 LAKE NATOMA DAILY OPERATIONS RUN DATE: July 27, 2004

IN LAKE

EVAP

C.F.S.

COMPUTED*

ACRE-FEET

RELEASE - C.F.S.

TOTALS +626 70,039 66,376 14 1,800 131

ACRE-FEET +626 138,922 131,657 28 3,570 260

COMMENTS:

* COMPUTED INFLOW IS THE SUM OF CHANGE IN STORAGE, RELEASES AND EVAPORATION.

SUMMARY

RELEASES (ACRE-FEET)

POWER 131,657

SPILL 28

FOLSOM SOUTH CANAL

HATCHERY

 2,785

 3,570

 7,602

FOLSOM

SOUTH 

CANAL

 40

 40

 40

 40

 42

 45

 48

 50

 50

 50

 50

 50

 50

 50

 50

 50

 50

 50

 50

 50

 50

 49

 45

 45

 45

 45

 45

 45

 45

 45

 1,404

 2,785

(1)

(1) INCHES OF EVAPORATION TAKEN FROM FOLSOM PAN.

RELEASES (ACRE-FEET)

TOTAL 138,040

Table 12
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 7
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM DECEMBER 31,
1999 FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1999
<DEBT-HELD-FOR-SALE>                        38,168,560
<DEBT-CARRYING-VALUE>                                0
<DEBT-MARKET-VALUE>                                  0
<EQUITIES>                                           0
<MORTGAGE>                                   1,027,790
<REAL-ESTATE>                                        0
<TOTAL-INVEST>                              50,073,868
<CASH>                                         127,180
<RECOVER-REINSURE>                         101,202,352
<DEFERRED-ACQUISITION>                       1,769,958
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             161,144,593
<POLICY-LOSSES>                            140,556,840
<UNEARNED-PREMIUMS>                                  0
<POLICY-OTHER>                               4,165,355
<POLICY-HOLDER-FUNDS>                        2,202,667
<NOTES-PAYABLE>                              1,312,500
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                  1,850,000
<COMMON>                                           876
<OTHER-SE>                                   4,889,606
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>               161,144,593
<PREMIUMS>                                  10,121,843
<INVESTMENT-INCOME>                          2,097,714
<INVESTMENT-GAINS>                             782,054
<OTHER-INCOME>                                 283,703
<BENEFITS>                                   6,086,799
<UNDERWRITING-AMORTIZATION>                    326,714
<UNDERWRITING-OTHER>                         9,314,979
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              1,421,455
<INCOME-TAX>                                    71,285
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          1,350,170
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 1,350,170
<EPS-BASIC>                                     161.39
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   155.79
<RESERVE-OPEN>                               1,659,756
<PROVISION-CURRENT>                                  0
<PROVISION-PRIOR>                                    0
<PAYMENTS-CURRENT>                           6,086,799
<PAYMENTS-PRIOR>                             1,022,250
<RESERVE-CLOSE>                              4,165,355
<CUMULATIVE-DEFICIENCY>                              0


</TABLE>
###### Editorial Note on Part 28

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 28 appear by T.D. ATF-477, 67 FR 18087 through 18090, Apr. 15, 2002.

#### § 28.315 Loss of wine in transit.

The tax on wine withdrawn without payment of tax under this part and which is lost during transportation from the bonded wine cellar from which withdrawn to (a) the port of export, (b) the vessel or aircraft, (c) the foreign-trade zone, (d) the manufacturing bonded warehouse, or (e) the customs bonded warehouse, as the case may be, may be remitted if evidence satisfactory to the appropriate TTB officer establishes that such wine has not been unlawfully diverted, or lost by theft with connivance, collusion, fraud, or negligence on the part of the exporter, owner, consignor, consignee, bailee, or carrier or the employees or agents of any of them. However, the remission of tax on wine withdrawn without payment of tax under this part and which is lost while in transit may be allowed only to the extent that the claimant is not indemnified or recompensed for such tax.

(Sec. 201, Pub. L. 85-859, 72 Stat. 1381, 1382 (26 U.S.C. 5370, 5371))

[T.D. ATF-88, 46 FR 39816, Aug. 5, 1981, as amended by T.D. TTB-8, 69 FR 3834, Jan. 27, 2004]
###### Editorial Note on Part 555

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 555 appear by T.D. ATF-487, 68 FR 3748, Jan. 24, 2003.

#### § 555.44 License or permit fee not refundable.

No refund of any part of the amount paid as a license or permit fee will be made where the operations of the licensee or permittee are, for any reason, discontinued during the period of an issued license or permit. However, the license or permit fee submitted with an application for a license or permit will be refunded if that application is denied, withdrawn, or abandoned, or if a license is cancelled subsequent to having been issued through administrative error.
<PAGE>


                          INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' CONSENT


We consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration Statement No.
33-3400, No. 33-57308, No. 33-59697 and No. 333-36497 of Ameron International
Corporation on Form S-8 of our reports dated January 24, 2000, appearing in
and incorporated by reference in this Annual Report on Form 10-K of Ameron
International Corporation for the year ended November 30, 1999.

                                                          DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP




Los Angeles, California
February 24, 2000


As independent public accountants, we hereby consent to the incorporation of
our reports included and incorporated by reference in this Form 10-K, into
the Company's previously filed Registration Statements (File No. 33-3400,
33-57308, 33-59697, and 333-36497).


                                                          ARTHUR ANDERSEN LLP



Los Angeles, California
February 24, 2000


                                   EXHIBIT 23