alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
|  |  | [if !vml]>[endif]>

You have  reached the Federal Depository Library Program Electronic Collection  (FDLP/EC) Archive. This archive assures ongoing access to publications in the  FDLP/EC. Access to publications in the archive is available through GPO's  suite of cataloging and locator services, including the Catalog of U.S.  Government Publications (CGP).
Title:    Understanding Alzheimer’s disease [electronic resource]    : what you need to know
 
SuDocs Number:HE 20.3852:AL 9/14/2011
Item      Number:[if !vml]>[endif]> 0447-A-26 (online)
GPO      System Number: 000867625
PDF      version | ePub version
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 [if !supportMisalignedColumns]>   [endif]>  
A service of the Superintendent of Documents,  U.S. Government Printing Office..

 

Last updated: May 14, 2020  Page Name:  http://permanent.access.gpo.gov/
perm |
|--|--|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
§ 1010.200 What is priority of service? ( a ) As defined in section 2(a) of the JVA (38 U.S.C. 4215(a)) “priority of service” means, with respect to any qualified job training program, that a covered person shall be given priority over a non-covered person for the receipt of employment, training, and placement services provided under that program, notwithstanding any other provision of the law.
( b ) Priority in the context of providing priority of service to veterans and other covered persons in qualified job training programs covered by this regulation means the right to take precedence over non-covered persons in obtaining services. Depending on the type of service or resource being provided, taking precedence may mean: ( 1 ) The covered person receives access to the service or resource earlier in time than the non-covered person; or
( 2 ) If the service or resource is limited, the covered person receives access to the service or resource instead of or before the non-covered person.
§ 10.421 May a beneficiary receive other kinds of payments from the Federal Government concurrently with compensation? ( a ) 5 U.S.C. 8116(a) provides that a beneficiary may not receive wage-loss compensation concurrently with a Federal retirement or survivor annuity. The beneficiary must elect the benefit that he or she wishes to receive, and the election, once made, is revocable.
( b ) An employee may receive compensation concurrently with military retired pay, retirement pay, retainer pay or equivalent pay for service in the Armed Forces or other uniformed services.
( c ) An employee may not receive compensation for total disability concurrently with severance pay or separation pay. However, an employee may concurrently receive compensation for partial disability or permanent impairment to a schedule member, organ or function with severance pay or separation pay.
( d ) Pursuant to 5 U.S.C. 8116(d), a beneficiary may receive compensation under the FECA for either the death or disability of an employee concurrently with benefits under title II of the Social Security Act on account of the age or death of such employee. However, this provision of the FECA also requires OWCP to reduce the amount of any such compensation by the amount of any Social Security Act benefits that are attributable to the Federal service of the employee.
( e ) To determine the employee's entitlement to compensation, OWCP may require an employee to submit an affidavit or statement as to the receipt of any Federally funded or Federally assisted benefits. If an employee fails to submit such affidavit or statement within 30 days of the date of the request, his or her right to compensation shall be suspended until such time as the requested affidavit or statement is received. At that time compensation will be reinstated retroactive to the date of suspension provided the employee is entitled to such compensation.
#### § 10.402 What is partial disability?

An injured employee who cannot return to the position held at the time of injury (or earn equivalent wages) due to the work-related injury, but who is not totally disabled for all gainful employment, is considered to be partially disabled.
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

JUDGMENT RENDERED SEPTEMBER 13, 2016

NO. 03-16-00317-CV

Theophilus Natter, Appellant

v.

Texas Department of State Health Services, Appellee

APPEAL FROM 98TH DISTRICT COURT OF TRAVIS COUNTY

BEFORE JUSTICES PURYEAR, PEMBERTON, AND FIELD

AFFIRMED -- OPINION BY JUSTICE FIELD

This is an appeal from the order signed by the trial court on February 18, 2016. Having reviewed 

the record and the parties’ arguments, the Court holds that there was no reversible error in the 

order. Therefore, the Court affirms the trial court’s order. Appellant shall pay all costs relating 

to this appeal, both in this Court and the court below.
---

---

Exhibit 11.1

AMPAL-AMERICAN
ISRAEL CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

SCHEDULE SETTING FORTH COMPUTATION OF LOSS PER SHARE OF CLASS A STOCK

|THREE MONTHS ENDED MARCH 31,   | 2005 | 2004
|------------------------------ | ---- | ----
|
|
|
|
|
|BASIC EPS                      |      |     
|Net Gain (loss) (1)            |      |     
|                               |      |     
|Gain (Loss) per Class A Share  |      |     
|                               |      |     
|Shares used in calculation (2) |      |     
|                               |      |     
|DILUTED EPS                    |      |     
|Net Gain (loss)                |      |     
|                               |      |     
|Gain (loss) per Class A Share  |      |     
|                               |      |     
|Shares used in calculation (2) |      |     

| | (1) | After
deduction of accrued preferred stock dividends of $50 and $53           respectively.
| | --- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

| | (2) | In
2004, the conversion of the 4% and 6-1/2% Preferred Stock and the exercise           of
stock options were excluded from the diluted EPS calculation due to the
          antidilutive effect.
| | --- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

27

---

---
### Williams , Rene e (OST) />f ; T - g S "^^'^^'^•^;,nW t i f - f Subject : FW : Cap e Ai r. AN3P0RTATJ0 N >xi: TOPERATION S 

## mm

## ~ 8 A 

## 10:1 8 From : Lett yHockle rrinailto:blhockler99(S)yahoo.com 1 Sent : Fr i 11/5/201 0 10:2 6 P M To : Devany , Denni s (OST ) Subject : Cap e Ai r Dea r Mayo r Nelson , I se e b y ou r

paper , today , that

Gulfstrea mi s filin g for

bankruptcy . T o m e that i s areal ey e opene r

a s t o wh y w e shoul dkee p Cap e Air . Didn't w e g o throug h thi s with apreviou s ai r lin e tha t lef t u s hig h an ddr

y i n spit e o f thei r promises . I hav e use dCap e Ai r

man y time s an dhav e foun dthe mt o b e reliable , affordable , courteous , helpful , friendl y an dapleasur e t o us e thei r ai r line . W e don't

nee dabigge r

plan e a s th e time s that

I hav e gon e t o Alban y th e mos t tha t wa s o n th e plan e wa s 6 people . Th e fligh t schedul e tha t

the y hav e can accommodat e an y body' s trave l schedule . Pleas e kee p Cap e Air . Ther e are man y peopl e i n Ogdensbur g tha t fee l lik e I d o an dI hop e the y wil l writ e t o yo u i n Cap e Air' s favor . Your s truly , Letty A . Hockle r
NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE REHEARING

MOTION AND, IF FILED, DETERMINED

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

OF FLORIDA

SECOND DISTRICT

RODERICK WASHINGTON, )

a/k/a RODERICK ANTWON )

WASHINGTON. )

)

Appellant, )

)

v. ) Case No. 2D15-3206

)

STATE OF FLORIDA, )

)

Appellee. )

)

Opinion filed September 26, 2018.

Appeal from the Circuit Court for Lee 

County; Bruce E. Kyle, Judge.

Howard L. Dimmig, II, Public Defender, and 

Maureen E. Surber, Assistant Public 

Defender, Bartow, for Appellant.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, 

Tallahassee, and Cerese Crawford Taylor, 

Assistant Attorney General, Tampa, for 

Appellee.

KELLY, Judge.

Roderick Washington was convicted of two counts of kidnapping and two 

counts of first-degree murder. He was seventeen years old when he participated in the 

offenses with several codefendants. His original sentences were overturned as 
- 2 -

violations of the Eighth Amendment, Lawton v. State, 181 So. 3d 452, 453 (Fla. 2015), 

and he was resentenced to two life terms and two forty-year terms under section 

775.082(1)(b)(1), Florida Statutes (2016), with the proviso that he could petition the 

court for review after twenty-five years under section 921.1402(2)(a), Florida Statutes 

(2016). In resentencing Washington, the sentencing court found that Washington 

intended to kill the victims.

In this appeal, Washington again challenges the sentences imposed on 

him, citing Williams v. State, 242 So. 3d 280 (Fla. 2018), which holds that Alleyne v. 

United States, 570 U.S. 99 (2013), requires a jury, rather than a judge, to make the 

factual finding as to whether the juvenile offender actually killed, intended to kill, or 

attempted to kill the victim. See 242 So. 3d at 288. Although the court in Williams 

concluded that Alleyne violations are subject to harmless error review, 242 So. 3d at 

289, the violation here cannot be deemed harmless. Therefore, we remand for the trial 

court to resentence Washington under section 775.082(1)(b)(2). See Williams, 242 So. 

3d at 294.

Reversed and remanded for resentencing.

NORTHCUTT and BLACK, JJ., Concur.
### §4426. Provision of facilities

#### (a) Plan

The Board shall prepare a master plan on the short- and long-term facilities needs of the Institute. The master plan shall include evaluation of all facets of existing Institute programs, including support activities and programs and facilities. The master plan shall include impact projections for the Institute's move to a new campus site. This master plan shall evaluate development and construction requirements (based on a growth plan approved by the Board), including (but not limited to) items such as infrastructure and site analysis, development of a phased plan with architectural and engineering studies, cost projections, landscaping, and related studies which cover all facets of the Institute's programs and planned functions.

#### (b) Deadline for transmittal

The plan required by this subsection shall be transmitted to Congress no later than 18 months after July 23, 1992. Such plan shall include a prioritization of needs, as determined by the Board.

(Pub. L. 99–498, title XV, §1519, as added Pub. L. 102–325, title XIII, §1331(k), July 23, 1992, 106 Stat. 808.)

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date

Section effective Oct. 1, 1992, see section 2 of Pub. L. 102–325, set out as an Effective Date of 1992 Amendment note under section 1001 of this title.
#### § 771.69 Withdrawal of request for hearing.

At any time prior to the assignment of an administrative law judge, the licensee or permittee may, by filing written notice with the Director of Industry Operations, withdraw his request for a hearing. If such a notice is filed after assignment to the administrative law judge and prior to issuance of his recommended decision the Director of Industry Operations shall move the administrative law judge to dismiss the proceedings as moot. If such a notice is filed either after issuance of a notice of denial or notice of revocation and before assignment of the administrative law judge, or after issuance by the administrative law judge of his recommended decision and prior to the Director of Industry Operations' order disapproving the application or denying the renewal of or revoking the license or permit, the Director of Industry Operations shall, by order, dismiss the proceeding.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY ELEV

 223.89

 222.96

 221.94

 220.67

 219.93

 219.63

 220.51

 220.45

 220.03

 220.05

 219.80

 219.80

 220.90

 222.44

 223.89

 223.39

 222.53

 221.76

 221.99

 222.14

 222.44

 221.67

 220.77

 220.04

 220.96

 222.06

 222.48

 222.04

 222.97

 222.86

 222.55

 53,431

 50,939

 48,229

 44,897

 42,971

 42,196

 44,479

 44,322

 43,230

 43,282

 42,635

 42,635

 45,498

 49,554

 53,431

 52,089

 49,793

 47,756

 48,360

 48,756

 49,554

 47,519

 45,158

 43,256

 45,656

 48,544

 49,660

 48,491

 50,966

 50,673

 49,847

STORAGE

+2,251

-2,492

-2,710

-3,332

-1,926

-775

+2,283

-157

-1,092

+52

-647

+0

+2,863

+4,056

+3,877

-1,342

-2,296

-2,037

+604

+396

+798

-2,035

-2,361

-1,902

+2,400

+2,888

+1,116

-1,169

+2,475

-293

-826

CHANGE

261

36

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

1,190

1,950

2,028

1,818

1,831

961

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

PUMPING

 4,579

 5,708

 5,769

 5,894

 5,812

 5,583

 5,075

 5,917

 6,713

 6,448

 6,790

 6,357

 5,492

 5,442

 6,128

 6,351

 6,444

 6,496

 5,967

 5,522

 5,520

 6,836

 6,626

 6,742

 6,712

 6,708

 5,629

 5,385

 6,600

 6,838

 6,693

PUMPING

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

PUMPING

 0

 37

 350

 519

 385

 233

 6

 432

 679

 1,189

 1,150

 1,138

 1,105

 428

 0

 0

 0

 0

 520

 858

 765

 943

 1,353

 1,299

 923

 971

 959

 874

 672

 969

 1,378

GEN.

*

-63

-380

-68

-251

-141

-490

-421

-210

-248

-302

-218

-273

-224

-208

-102

-163

-369

-198

+2

-106

-178

-459

-73

-284

-238

-342

-144

-225

-313

-16

+387

OR

UNITED STATES 

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION

CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT

CONSOLIDATED STATE-FEDERAL O'NEILL FOREBAY July 20, 2012

DAILY OPERATIONS

MAY 2012 RUN DATE:

IN LAKE GEN.

ACRE-FEET O'NEILL

RELEASE - C.F.S. 

TOTALS -1,333 10,075 20,135 0 188,776 -6,318

ACRE-FEET -1,333 19,984 39,938 0 374,437

SUMMARY

 1,037

RELEASE (ACRE-FEET)

O'NEILL GEN. 39,938

SAN LUIS PUMP 0 1,037

 51,180

DOS AMIGOS PUMP 374,437

DELIVERIES 

S. LUIS O'NEILL

 4,702

 3,910

 3,910

 3,910

 3,932

 3,940

 5,099

 5,783

 6,420

 7,705

 7,677

 7,655

 5,760

 5,725

 5,682

 3,769

 3,770

 3,770

 3,763

 3,753

 3,747

 3,740

 3,740

 6,530

 8,786

 9,169

 7,025

 5,501

 5,482

 5,459

 5,450

 165,264

 327,801

CALIF. DOS AMIGOS

AQUEDUCT

814

923

911

1,074

1,434

1,975

1,554

696

669

260

154

113

2,505

1,208

553

40

67

67

2,065

2,932

3,117

3,473

3,121

837

297

309

270

394

3,351

2,217

2,341

 39,741

 78,826

S. LUIS

DELIV.

GAINS(+)

LOSS(-)

C.F.S.

INFLOW - C.F.S.

STATE OF CALIFORNIA

THE RESOURCES AGENCY

DEPARTMENT OF WATER RESOURCES

STATE WATER PROJECT

TOTAL 415,412

-12,532

* DAILY DEL. FIGURES UNAVAILABLE. TOT. DEL. IS INCLUDED IN COMPUTING MONTHLY TOTALS 

Table 18
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent

except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 02-30398

Summary Calendar

 

DEDLON GELIN,

Petitioner-Appellant,

versus

JOHN ASHCROFT, U.S. ATTORNEY GENERAL,

Respondent-Appellee.

--------------------

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Western District of Louisiana

USDC No. 01-CV-2243

--------------------

November 19, 2002

Before JONES, STEWART, and DENNIS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Dedlon Gelin appeals the district court’s dismissal of his 28

U.S.C. § 2241 petition, which challenged his removal order based

upon his Massachusetts conviction for distribution of cocaine.

Gelin argues that he is entitled to a withholding of removal under

8 U.S.C. § 1231(b)(3) or a deferral of removal under the Convention

Against Torture under 8 C.F.R. § 208.17. He does not raise issue

with the district court’s determination that he was not entitled to
No. 02-30398

-2-

seek INA § 212(c). Gelin has thus waived the claim, and we not

address it. See Yohey v. Collins, 985 F.2d 222, 224-25 (5th Cir.

1993). The district court judgment as to this claim is AFFIRMED.

With respect to Gelin’s claims that he was entitled to either

a withholding or a deferral of removal based upon his contention

that he will be persecuted and/or tortured upon his return to

Haiti, Gelin did not clearly assert these claims in the district

court until his objections to the magistrate judge’s report, and

the district court never addressed the claims. The claims should

have been addressed. See United States v. Riascos, 76 F.3d 93, 94

(5th Cir. 1996).

Gelin did not include any of the records from his removal

proceedings. Whether he has raised these claims before the

immigration judge and the Board of Immigration Appeals and whether

he exhausted his administrative remedies are not clear. The

district court’s order dismissing Gelin’s 28 U.S.C. § 2241 petition

is VACATED and the case is REMANDED so that the district court may

address Gelin’s withholding and deferral of removal claims and

determine whether Gelin has exhausted his administrative remedies

with respect to those claims.

VACATED AND REMANDED FOR FURTHER PROCEEDINGS.
A-AA+Skip to content

                  - Home
                  - Compendium Statistics
                  - Event
                  - Archives
                  - Glossary
                  - Help
                  - Contact
                  - Research on Disability

Annual Disability Statistics Compendium

              - Home /
              - Archives /
              - 2012 Compendium Statistics /
              - 2012 Health /
              - 2012 8.3 Health Behavior - Smoking among Persons Aged 18 and Over, by Disability Status

## Table 8.3: Health Behavior—Percent (%) Smoking among Persons Ages 18 and Over, by Disability Status: 2011

----

----

 

----

#### 2012 Disability Compendium

                        - Home
                        - Compendium Statistics                           - Population and Prevelance
                          - Employment
                          - Time Trend Population Statistics
                          - Poverty
                          - Earnings
                          - Veterans
                          - Health Insurance Coverage
                          - Health
                          - Social Security Administration Programs
                          - Medicaid and Medicare
                          - Special Education
                          - Vocational Rehabilitation
                          - Federal Government Spending and Employment
                          - International Disability Statistics
                          - Population Statistics: Disability Type
                        - Event
                        - Archives                           - 2012 Compendium Statistics
                        - Glossary
                        - Help
                        - Contact
                        - Research on Disability

#### Funding for this project is made possible by:

 The Research and Training Center on Disability Statistics and Demographics (StatsRRTC), which is funded by the U.S. Department of Education, National Institute for Disability and Rehabilitation Research, under cooperative agreements H133B080012.

#### Stay Connected

**Institute on Disability**10 West Edge Drive, Suite 101Durham, NH 03824603.862.4320 | relay: 711 | [email protected]www.iod.unh.edu

© 2013. Institute on Disability.University of New Hampshire.
### §§3121 to 3130. Omitted

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Sections were omitted in the general amendment of the Elementary and Secondary Education Act of 1965, Pub. L. 89–10, by Pub. L. 103–382, title I, §101, Oct. 20, 1994, 108 Stat. 3519.

Section 3121, Pub. L. 89–10, title IV, §4401, as added Pub. L. 100–297, title I, §1001, Apr. 28, 1988, 102 Stat. 242, provided that this part could be cited as the "Emergency Immigrant Education Act of 1984".

A prior section 3121, Pub. L. 89–10, title IV, §441, as added Pub. L. 95–561, title IV, §401, Nov. 1, 1978, 92 Stat. 2239; amended Pub. L. 96–88, title III, §301(a)(1), title V, §507, Oct. 17, 1979, 93 Stat. 677, 692, related to authorized programs and funding for guidance, counseling, and testing, prior to repeal by Pub. L. 97–35, title V, §587(a)(1), Aug. 13, 1981, 95 Stat. 480, eff. Oct. 1, 1982.

Section 3122, Pub. L. 89–10, title IV, §4402, as added Pub. L. 100–297, title I, §1001, Apr. 28, 1988, 102 Stat. 242, defined terms used in this part.

A prior section 3122, Pub. L. 89–10, title IV, §442, as added Pub. L. 95–561, title IV, §401, Nov. 1, 1978, 93 Stat. 677, 692, related to program requirements for guidance, counseling, and testing, prior to repeal by Pub. L. 97–35, title V, §587(a)(1), Aug. 13, 1981, 95 Stat. 480, eff. Oct. 1, 1982.

Section 3123, Pub. L. 89–10, title IV, §4403, as added Pub. L. 100–297, title I, §1001, Apr. 28, 1988, 102 Stat. 242, related to authorization and allocation of appropriations.

A prior section 3123, Pub. L. 89–10, title IV, §443, as added Pub. L. 95–561, title IV, §401, Nov. 1, 1978, 92 Stat. 2240; amended Pub. L. 96–88, title III, §301(a)(1), (b)(2), title V, §507, Oct. 17, 1979, 93 Stat. 677, 678, 692, related to establishment by Secretary of an administrative unit to provide information and advice on guidance and counseling activities, prior to repeal by Pub. L. 97–35, title V, §587(a)(1), Aug. 13, 1981, 95 Stat. 480, eff. Oct. 1, 1982.

Section 3124, Pub. L. 89–10, title IV, §4404, as added Pub. L. 100–297, title I, §1001, Apr. 28, 1988, 102 Stat. 243, related to State administrative costs.

Section 3125, Pub. L. 89–10, title IV, §4405, as added Pub. L. 100–297, title I, §1001, Apr. 28, 1988, 102 Stat. 243, related to withholding.

Section 3126, Pub. L. 89–10, title IV, §4406, as added Pub. L. 100–297, title I, §1001, Apr. 28, 1988, 102 Stat. 243, related to State entitlements.

Section 3127, Pub. L. 89–10, title IV, §4407, as added Pub. L. 100–297, title I, §1001, Apr. 28, 1988, 102 Stat. 244, related to uses of funds.

Section 3128, Pub. L. 89–10, title IV, §4408, as added Pub. L. 100–297, title I, §1001, Apr. 28, 1988, 102 Stat. 245, related to applications.

Section 3129, Pub. L. 89–10, title IV, §4409, as added Pub. L. 100–297, title I, §1001, Apr. 28, 1988, 102 Stat. 246, related to payments.

Section 3130, Pub. L. 89–10, title IV, §4410, as added Pub. L. 100–297, title I, §1001, Apr. 28, 1988, 102 Stat. 246, related to reports.
Electronically Filed

Intermediate Court of Appeals

CAAP-16-0000442

26-APR-2017

10:34 AM