alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY ELEV

 219.66

 219.11

 218.12

 218.25

 218.69

 220.61

 221.01

 221.57

 221.83

 220.96

 220.25

 221.06

 220.34

 220.11

 219.45

 219.90

 220.96

 220.82

 221.69

 222.12

 222.03

 221.56

 222.63

 223.68

 224.66

 223.30

 221.59

 221.18

 219.75

 219.13

 219.38

 42,273

 40,864

 38,370

 38,694

 39,800

 44,740

 45,787

 47,257

 47,940

 45,656

 43,801

 45,918

 44,036

 43,437

 41,733

 42,893

 45,656

 45,289

 47,572

 48,703

 48,464

 47,230

 50,060

 52,866

 55,509

 51,848

 47,309

 46,233

 42,505

 40,915

 41,554

STORAGE

-155

-1,409

-2,494

+324

+1,106

+4,940

+1,047

+1,470

+683

-2,284

-1,855

+2,117

-1,882

-599

-1,704

+1,160

+2,763

-367

+2,283

+1,131

-239

-1,234

+2,830

+2,806

+2,643

-3,661

-4,539

-1,076

-3,728

-1,590

+639

CHANGE

0

0

0

0

157

632

1,087

1,090

1,082

513

175

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

202

204

296

746

1,212

1,091

826

455

233

0

0

PUMPING

 1,596

 1,596

 1,579

 1,459

 2,208

 1,691

 2,069

 2,720

 2,144

 2,272

 2,292

 2,160

 2,770

 2,821

 2,768

 2,655

 1,671

 2,852

 3,087

 3,059

 3,575

 3,523

 3,130

 2,258

 3,633

 3,158

 3,697

 3,761

 3,454

 4,415

 3,328

PUMPING

 793

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 1,114

 955

 950

 0

 947

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 647

 0

 0

 0

 1,150

 652

 1,792

 1,350

 0

 482

PUMPING

 0

 376

 624

 343

 204

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 50

 572

 1,045

 937

 835

 647

 564

 486

 677

 844

 294

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 234

 403

 152

GEN.

*

+342

+92

-138

-77

-54

+280

-207

+97

+90

+26

+189

-118

+108

-403

-28

-33

+26

-583

+109

-94

+132

+135

-133

-133

+89

+4

-68

+198

+59

-97

+560

OR

UNITED STATES 

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION

CONSOLIDATED STATE-FEDERAL O'NEILL FOREBAY June 25, 2008

DAILY OPERATIONS

MARCH 2008 RUN DATE:

IN LAKE GEN.

ACRE-FEET O'NEILL

RELEASE - C.F.S. 

TOTALS -874 10,001 9,287 10,832 83,401 +370

ACRE-FEET -874 19,837 18,421 21,485 165,426

SUMMARY

 767

RELEASE (ACRE-FEET)

O'NEILL GEN. 18,421

SAN LUIS PUMP 21,485 767

 42,428

DOS AMIGOS PUMP 165,426

DELIVERIES 

S. LUIS O'NEILL

 677

 0

 0

 1,098

 1,344

 1,173

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 1,765

 1,765

 2,269

 1,765

 3,344

 2,827

 2,246

 2,964

 2,719

 1,739

 1,741

 3,223

 1,732

 2,371

 0

 0

 3,158

 1,650

 2,827

 3,231

 47,628

 94,470

CALIF. DOS AMIGOS

AQUEDUCT

1,292

1,170

1,083

944

1,522

2,097

1,717

2,274

2,431

1,536

1,993

2,152

1,940

1,591

1,007

576

774

1,490

1,841

1,849

1,676

1,468

1,170

1,327

1,294

1,368

1,303

1,201

1,217

1,286

882

 45,471

 90,192

S. LUIS

DELIV.

GAINS(+)

LOSS(-)

C.F.S.

INFLOW - C.F.S.

STATE OF CALIFORNIA

THE RESOURCES AGENCY

DEPARTMENT OF WATER RESOURCES

STATE WATER PROJECT

TOTAL 206,099

 734

* DAILY DEL. FIGURES UNAVAILABLE. TOT. DEL. IS INCLUDED IN COMPUTING MONTHLY TOTALS 

Table 18
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 98-20159 Summary Calendar

DANIEL RAYMOND STOREMSKI, Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus JOHNNY KLEVENHAGEN, sheriff, ET AL., Defendant-Appellant.

- - - - - - - - - - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas

USDC No. H-96-CV-45

- - - - - - - - - - March 1, 1999 Before HIGGINBOTHAM, JONES, and DENNIS, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: * Johnny Klevenhagen appeals the district court’s denial of his motion for summary judgment. The court held that Klevenhagen was not protected by the defense of qualified immunity in Daniel Storemski’s 42 U.S.C. § 1983 suit. His failure to provide Storemski with his medication and to transfer him to a psychiatric hospital pursuant to court order did not involve discretionary functions.No. 98-20159 -2- This court reviews the denial of a motion for summary judgment de novo using the same criteria applied by the district court in the first instance. Reese v. Anderson , 926 F.2d 494, 498 (5th Cir. 1991). The first inquiry in examining a defense of qualified immunity asserted in a motion for summary judgment is to determine whether the plaintiff has alleged “the violation of a clearly established constitutional right.” Siegert v. Gilley , 500 U.S. 226, 231 (1991). The second step is to “decide whether the defendant’s conduct was objectively reasonable” in light of the legal rules clearly established at the time of the incident. Spann v. Rainey , 987 F.2d 1110, 1114 (5th Cir. 1993). Storemski’s § 1983 claim addressed by the district court in its denial order rests on the allegation that by violating the state-court order, Klevenhagen violated his constitutional rights. A remedial order cannot serve as a substantive basis for a § 1983 claim because such orders to not create “‘rights, privileges, or immunities secured by the Constitution and laws.’” Green v. McKaskle , 788 F.2d 1116, 1123 (5th Cir. 1986), quoting § 1983. Remedial decrees “are the means by which unconstitutional conditions are corrected but they do not create or enlarge constitutional rights.” Green , 788 F.2d at 1123. As a result, Storemski has not established a violation of a “clearly established constitutional right” that would allow recovery under § 1983. The judgment is REVERSED, and the case is REMANDED.
EXHIBIT 12.1
 Alta Mesa Holdings, LP
Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges
 Three Months EndedMarch 31,2011

    2010
    
    
    2009
    
    
    2008
    
    
    2007
    
    
    2006(dollars in thousands)Earnings:Net income (loss) before tax
    
    $
    (12,166
    )

    $
    14,231
    
    
    $
    (50,037
    )
    
    $
    36,880
    
    
    $
    (27,476
    )
    
    $
    9,853Fixed charges:Interest (1)
    
    
    9,240
    

    
    23,981
    
    
    
    11,949
    
    
    
    9,212
    
    
    
    9,010
    
    
    
    9,741Earnings before fixed charges
    
    
    (2,926
    )

    
    38,212
    
    
    
    (38,088
    )
    
    
    46,092
    
    
    
    (18,466
    )
    
    
    19,594Fixed charges:Interest (1)
    
    
    9,240
    

    
    23,981
    
    
    
    11,949
    
    
    
    9,212
    
    
    
    9,010
    
    
    
    9,741Total fixed charges
    
    $
    9,240
    

    $
    23,981
    
    
    $
    11,949
    
    
    $
    9,212
    
    
    $
    9,010
    
    
    $
    9,741Ratio of earnings to fixed
charges
   
    NA
    
    
    
    1.59
    
    
    NA
    
    
    
    5.00
    
    
    NA
    
    
    
    2.01
 
 (1)
    
    Interest expense includes interest on debt, amortization of discount on debt, and an
estimate of the interest expense portion of rent expense.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY ELEV

 1,049.14

 1,049.15

 1,049.23

 1,049.29

 1,049.30

 1,049.34

 1,049.34

 1,049.29

 1,049.25

 1,049.26

 1,049.23

 1,049.18

 1,049.19

 1,049.13

 1,048.98

 1,049.11

 1,049.70

 1,050.06

 1,050.21

 1,050.33

 1,050.43

 1,050.50

 1,050.55

 1,050.62

 1,050.72

 1,050.76

 1,050.59

 1,050.56

 1,050.46

 1,050.44

 1,050.60

 1,965.6

 1,965.7

 1,966.5

 1,967.2

 1,967.3

 1,967.8

 1,967.8

 1,967.2

 1,966.8

 1,966.9

 1,966.5

 1,966.0

 1,966.1

 1,965.5

 1,963.8

 1,965.2

 1,971.7

 1,975.7

 1,977.3

 1,978.6

 1,979.7

 1,980.5

 1,981.0

 1,981.8

 1,982.9

 1,983.4

 1,981.5

 1,981.2

 1,980.1

 1,979.8

 1,981.6

STORAGE

+0.7

+0.1

+0.9

+0.7

+0.1

+0.4

+0.0

-0.5

-0.4

+0.1

-0.3

-0.5

+0.1

-0.7

-1.6

+1.4

+6.5

+3.9

+1.7

+1.3

+1.1

+0.8

+0.6

+0.8

+1.1

+0.4

-1.9

-0.3

-1.1

-0.2

+1.8

CHANGE

709

520

570

537

589

538

600

541

601

509

439

604

845

1,159

825

2,115

4,071

2,032

1,193

1,049

1,252

1,209

1,053

1,183

1,125

1,120

959

1,084

826

975

1,650

INFLOW

 331

 465

 100

 162

 460

 289

 568

 764

 783

 383

 541

 866

 758

 1,491

 1,654

 1,393

 722

 13

 361

 345

 654

 775

 776

 674

 570

 870

 1,852

 1,222

 1,292

 1,065

 656

POWER

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

SPILL

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

OUTLET

 46

 0

 28

 43

 74

 28

 32

 53

 39

 71

 64

 14

 32

 0

 0

 4

 89

 28

 0

 39

 43

 46

 0

 121

 0

 28

 50

 28

 89

 21

 107

C.F.S.

 .13

 .00

 .08

 .12

 .21

 .08

 .09

 .15

 .11

 .20

 .18

 .04

 .09

 .00

 .00

 .01

 .25

 .08

 .00

 .11

 .12

 .13

 .00

 .34

 .00

 .08

 .14

 .08

 .25

 .06

 .30

INCHES

 .66

 .10

 .02

 .00

 .00

 .03

 .03

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .48

 .44

 .03

 2.13

 1.16

 .19

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .01

 .00

 .27

 .08

 .14

 .37

 .02

 .02

 .00

PRECIP

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

MARCH 2012 NEW MELONES LAKE DAILY OPERATIONS RUN DATE: May 3, 2012

IN LAKE

EVAPORATION

INCHES

C.F.S.

COMPUTED*

1000 ACRE-FEET

RELEASE - C.F.S.

TOTALS +17.0 32,482 22,855 0 0 1,217 3.43 6.18

ACRE-FEET +17,000 64,428 45,333 0 0 2,414

COMMENTS:

* COMPUTED INFLOW IS THE SUM OF CHANGE IN STORAGE, RELEASES AND EVAPORATION.

SUMMARY

RELEASE (ACRE-FEET)

POWER 45,333

SPILL 0

OUTLET

TOTAL

 0

 45,333

PRECIPITATION

THIS MONTH =

TO DATE =

 6.18

JULY 1, 2011 17.40

 1,964.9
Editorial Note on Part 25
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 25 appear by T.D. ATF-437, 66 FR 5478, 5479, Jan. 19, 2001.

§ 25.61 General requirements for notice. ( a ) *Establishment.* Operations as a brewer may be conducted only by a person who has given notice as a brewer under this subpart. A person may not commence the business of a brewer until the appropriate TTB officer approves the brewery and the brewer's notice, including all documents made part of that notice.
( b ) *Brewer's Notice, Form 5130.10.* Each person must, before commencing business as a brewer, give notice on Form 5130.10. Each person continuing business as a brewer as provided in § 25.71 must give notice on Form 5130.10. Each notice will be executed under penalties of perjury, and all written statements, affidavits, and other documents submitted in support of the notice will be made part of the notice.
( c ) *Additional information.* The appropriate TTB officer may at any time require the brewer to furnish, as part of the notice, additional information which is necessary to protect and insure collection of the revenue.
(Sec. 201, Pub. L. 85-859, 72 Stat. 1388, as amended (26 U.S.C. 5401))
[T.D. ATF-224, 51 FR 7673, Mar. 5, 1986, as amended by T.D. ATF-437, 66 FR 5479, Jan. 19, 2001]
§ 10.323 What are the penalties for failing to report for or obstructing a second opinion or referee examination? ( a ) If an employee refuses to submit to or in any way obstructs an examination required by OWCP, including testing such as functional capacity determinations conducted in connection with an OWCP-directed medical examination, his or her right to compensation under the FECA is suspended under 5 U.S.C. 8123(d) until such refusal or obstruction stops. The action of the employee's representative is considered to be the action of the employee for purposes of this section. The employee will forfeit compensation otherwise paid or payable under the FECA for the period of the refusal or obstruction, and any compensation already paid for that period will be declared an overpayment and will be subject to recovery pursuant to 5 U.S.C. 8129.
( b ) If the employee does not report for an OWCP-directed examination or in any way obstructs this examination, he or she may provide an explanation to OWCP within 14 days. If this explanation does not establish good cause for the employee's actions, entitlement to compensation will be suspended in accordance with 5 U.S.C. 8123(d). Should the employee subsequently agree to attend the examination or cease the obstruction (as expressed in writing or by telephone documented on Form CA-110), OWCP will restore any periodic benefits to which the employee is entitled when the employee actually reports for and cooperates with the examination. Payment is retroactive to the date the employee agreed to attend or cease obstruction of the examination.
A-AA+Skip to content

                  - Home
                  - Compendium Statistics
                  - Event
                  - Archives
                  - Glossary
                  - Help
                  - Contact
                  - Research on Disability

Annual Disability Statistics Compendium

              - Home /
              - Archives /
              - 2012 Compendium Statistics /
              - 2012 Federal Government Spending and Employment /
              - 2012 13.4 Federal Government Spending and Employment—Federal Expenditures on Education, Training, and Employment Readiness

## Table 13.4: Federal Government Spending and Employment—Federal Expenditures on Education, Training, and Employment Readiness

----

----

 

----

#### 2012 Disability Compendium

                        - Home
                        - Compendium Statistics                           - Population and Prevelance
                          - Employment
                          - Time Trend Population Statistics
                          - Poverty
                          - Earnings
                          - Veterans
                          - Health Insurance Coverage
                          - Health
                          - Social Security Administration Programs
                          - Medicaid and Medicare
                          - Special Education
                          - Vocational Rehabilitation
                          - Federal Government Spending and Employment
                          - International Disability Statistics
                          - Population Statistics: Disability Type
                        - Event
                        - Archives                           - 2012 Compendium Statistics
                        - Glossary
                        - Help
                        - Contact
                        - Research on Disability

#### Funding for this project is made possible by:

 The Research and Training Center on Disability Statistics and Demographics (StatsRRTC), which is funded by the U.S. Department of Education, National Institute for Disability and Rehabilitation Research, under cooperative agreements H133B080012.

#### Stay Connected

**Institute on Disability**10 West Edge Drive, Suite 101Durham, NH 03824603.862.4320 | relay: 711 | [email protected]www.iod.unh.edu

© 2013. Institute on Disability.University of New Hampshire.
APPLICANT LAKIM MINTRELL GUILD APPLICATION NO. WR-82,609-01 

### APPLICATION FOR 11.07 WRIT OFHABEAS CORPUS AFTER REMAND ACTION TAKEN DENIED WITHOUT WRITTEN ORDERON FINDINGS OF TRIAL COURT WITHOUT HEARING. 

# OJLt 

# m\& FUDGE DATE
RECEIVED IN

The Court of Appeals

Sixth District

AUG 1 3 2015

Texarkana, Texas , Debra Autrey, Clerk

CASE NO. 06-15-00038-CV

IN THE

COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE

SIXTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

AT TEXARKANA, TEXAS

FILED IN

The Court of Appeals

Sixth District

AUG 1 3 2015

Texarkana, Texas

Debra K. Autrey, Glerk

IN THE MATTER OF THE MARRIAGE OF

AMANDA CHERI BRADSHAW

Petitioner/Appellant

AND

BARNEY SAMUEL BRADSHAW

Respondent/Appellee

Appeal from the County Court at Law

Rusk County, Texas

Cause No. 2013-09-482-CCL

The Honorable Chad Dean, Presiding

APPELLEE'S MOTION TO SUSPEND RULE 9.3(a)

TO THE HONORABLE JUSTICES OF THE SIXTH COURT OF APPEALS:

COMES NOW, BARNEY SAMUEL BRADSHAW, Respondent/Appellee in

the above styled and numbered cause and moves the Court to suspend

Rule 9.3(a) of the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure. In support

of this motion Appellee shows the Court the following:

I.

Appellee is currently incarcerated in the Mark W. Michael

Unit of the Texas Department of Criminal Justice - Correctional

Institutions Division in Tennessee Colony, Texas.

II.

Rule 9.3(a) states in pertinent part: (1) A party must file:

1
(A) the original and three copies of all documents in an original

proceeding; (B) the original and two copies of all motions in an

appellate proceeding; and (C) the original and five copies of all

other documents. See TEX. R. APP. PROC. Rule 9.3(a).

III.

Due to Appellee's current incarceration, he is unable to

duplicate any documents because he does not have access to a copymachine .

PRAYER

WHEREFORE, PREMISES CONSIDERED, Barney Samuel Bradshaw re

spectfully requests that the Court suspend Rule 9.3(a) of the

Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure and permit him to file only

the original of all documents.

Respectfully submitted,

BARNEY SAMUEL BRADSHAW

APPELLEE

TDCJ No. 01942978

Mark W. Michael Unit

2664 FM 2054

Tennessee Colony, Texas 75886

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I hereby certify that a true and correct copy of the fore

going motion has been served by placing same in the United States

Mail, postage prepaid, on this the 10th day of August, 2015, ad

dressed to Ebb B. Mobley, Attorney for Appellant, P.O. Box 2309,

Longview, Texas 75606.

BARNEY SAMUEL BRADSHAW

APPELLEE
EXHIBIT 32
 
 
 SECTION 906 CERTIFICATION BY DWIGHT O. SEEGMILLER
 
 In connection with the quarterly report of Hills Bancorporation (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Dwight O. Seegmiller, Director, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:
 
 1.           The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and
 
 2.           The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
 
 Date:  May 7, 2010

By: /s/ Dwight O. SeegmillerDwight O. Seegmiller, Director, President and Chief Executive Officer
 
 
 SECTION 906 CERTIFICATION BY JAMES G. PRATT
 
 In connection with the quarterly report of Hills Bancorporation (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, James G. Pratt, Treasurer and Chief Accounting Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:
 
 1.           The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and
 
 2.           The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
 
 Date:  May 7, 2010

By: /s/ James G. PrattJames G. Pratt, Secretary, Treasurer and Chief Accounting Officer
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY

 55,219

 54,389

 53,547

 52,596

 51,465

 50,561

 49,529

 48,490

 47,612

 47,384

 46,892

 45,992

 45,183

 44,710

 43,987

 43,024

 42,591

 41,981

 41,526

 41,279

 41,145

 41,058

 40,650

 40,091

 39,727

 39,588

 39,563

 39,581

 39,512

 39,358

 39,301

 95,994

 95,902

 95,787

 95,687

 95,787

 95,630

 95,602

 95,581

 95,416

 94,691

 94,357

 94,329

 94,279

 93,925

 93,790

 93,890

 93,416

 93,154

 92,696

 92,056

 91,375

 90,564

 90,076

 89,721

 89,179

 88,376

 87,479

 86,471

 85,650

 84,908

 84,059

STORAGE - A.F. 

 151,213

 150,291

 149,334

 148,283

 147,252

 146,191

 145,131

 144,071

 143,028

 142,075

 141,249

 140,321

 139,462

 138,635

 137,777

 136,914

 136,007

 135,135

 134,222

 133,335

 132,520

 131,622

 130,726

 129,812

 128,906

 127,964

 127,042

 126,052

 125,162

 124,266

 123,360

913

1,009

1,014

1,010

934

950

983

959

1,044

874

742

810

814

850

805

847

877

700

826

995

755

742

949

1,293

1,217

917

633

813

775

839

955

452

544

532

480

414

415

449

425

518

394

326

342

381

433

372

412

420

260

366

548

344

289

497

832

760

442

168

314

326

387

498

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

AUGUST 2010 FULL NATURAL FLOW AT NEW MELONES DAM RUN DATE: 10/08/2010

TOTALS -28,767 13,340

* October 1, 26,460

 966.7

 967.8

 968.8

 969.8

 970.6

 971.4

 972.3

 973.1

 974.2

 974.9

 975.6

 976.3

 977.0

 977.9

 978.6

 979.4

 980.3

 980.8

 981.5

 982.6

 983.3

 983.9

 984.8

 986.5

 988.0

 988.9

 989.2

 989.8

 990.5

 991.3

 992.2

DONNELLS

RES

BEARDSLEY

RES

2009 TO DATE

NEW

MELONES

INFLOW

C.F.S

NATURAL

RIVER

C.F.S

ACCUM *

FULL

NATURAL

1000 A.F.

RESERVOIR

TOTAL

-914

-922

-957

-1,051

-1,031

-1,061

-1,060

-1,060

-1,043

-953

-826

-928

-859

-827

-858

-863

-907

-872

-913

-887

-815

-898

-896

-914

-906

-942

-922

-990

-890

-896

-906

CHANGE

A.F. C.F.S.

-461

-465

-482

-530

-520

-535

-534

-534

-526

-480

-416

-468

-433

-417

-433

-435

-457

-440

-460

-447

-411

-453

-452

-461

-457

-475

-465

-499

-449

-452

-457
#### Lillian E. Ravenscroft, Appellant, v. County of Westchester, Respondent.

Present — Close, T?. J., Carswell, Johnston, Adel and Taylor, JJ.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<CIK> 0000790609
<NAME> MOORE'S LANE PROPERTIES LTD.
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1998
<CASH>                                           5,809
<SECURITIES>                                   609,504
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                       1,266,988
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,883,301
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          242,709
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                   1,640,492
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 1,883,301
<SALES>                                      2,448,096
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             1,522,795
<CGS>                                          720,714
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  946,323
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               237,320
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                907,055
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            907,055
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   907,055
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    68.50
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    68.50
        

</TABLE>