alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY ELEV

 1,025.12

 1,024.80

 1,024.55

 1,024.34

 1,024.04

 1,023.75

 1,023.44

 1,023.19

 1,022.87

 1,022.53

 1,022.18

 1,021.83

 1,021.43

 1,021.16

 1,020.82

 1,020.54

 1,020.11

 1,019.80

 1,019.55

 1,019.33

 1,019.03

 1,018.77

 1,018.53

 1,018.19

 1,017.91

 1,017.65

 1,017.38

 1,017.05

 1,016.70

 1,016.49

 1,016.18

 1,713.1

 1,709.8

 1,707.3

 1,705.2

 1,702.2

 1,699.3

 1,696.2

 1,693.7

 1,690.5

 1,687.1

 1,683.6

 1,680.1

 1,676.1

 1,673.4

 1,670.1

 1,667.3

 1,663.0

 1,660.0

 1,657.5

 1,655.3

 1,652.3

 1,649.8

 1,647.4

 1,644.1

 1,641.3

 1,638.8

 1,636.1

 1,632.9

 1,629.5

 1,627.4

 1,624.4

STORAGE

-3.1

-3.2

-2.5

-2.1

-3.0

-2.9

-3.1

-2.5

-3.2

-3.4

-3.5

-3.5

-4.0

-2.7

-3.4

-2.8

-4.3

-3.1

-2.5

-2.2

-3.0

-2.6

-2.4

-3.3

-2.8

-2.6

-2.6

-3.2

-3.4

-2.1

-3.0

CHANGE

661

906

829

711

661

805

649

566

813

561

670

506

336

319

678

715

605

798

763

764

562

697

891

755

746

787

820

654

573

750

711

INFLOW

 2,081

 2,367

 1,933

 1,633

 2,065

 2,138

 2,134

 1,732

 2,281

 2,169

 2,290

 2,143

 2,246

 1,544

 2,242

 2,003

 2,668

 2,241

 1,883

 1,732

 1,944

 1,885

 1,955

 2,312

 1,996

 1,946

 1,965

 2,142

 2,146

 1,651

 2,112

POWER

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

SPILL

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

OUTLET

 157

 163

 163

 143

 117

 133

 81

 97

 146

 103

 142

 122

 97

 129

 138

 112

 86

 102

 125

 128

 112

 102

 127

 130

 137

 127

 190

 143

 152

 133

 126

C.F.S.

 .48

 .50

 .50

 .44

 .36

 .41

 .25

 .30

 .45

 .32

 .44

 .38

 .30

 .40

 .43

 .35

 .27

 .32

 .39

 .40

 .35

 .32

 .40

 .41

 .43

 .40

 .60

 .45

 .48

 .42

 .40

INCHES

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .05

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

PRECIP

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

JULY 2001 NEW MELONES LAKE DAILY OPERATIONS RUN DATE: August 17, 2001

IN LAKE

EVAPORATION

INCHES

C.F.S.

COMPUTED*

1000 ACRE-FEET

RELEASE - C.F.S.

TOTALS -92.0 21,262 63,579 0 0 3,963 12.35 .05

ACRE-FEET -92,000 42,173 126,109 0 0 7,861

COMMENTS:

* COMPUTED INFLOW IS THE SUM OF CHANGE IN STORAGE, RELEASES AND EVAPORATION.

SUMMARY

RELEASE (ACRE-FEET)

POWER 126,109

SPILL 0

OUTLET

TOTAL

 0

 126,109

PRECIPITATION

THIS MONTH =

TO DATE =

 .05

JULY 1, 2001 .05

 1,716.2

Table 13
### §1861. Deception of prospective purchasers

Whoever, for a reward paid or promised to him in that behalf, undertakes to locate for an intending purchaser, settler, or entryman any public lands of the United States subject to disposition under the public-land laws, and who willfully and falsely represents to such intending purchaser, settler, or entryman that any tract of land shown to him is public land of the United States subject to sale, settlement, or entry, or that it is of a particular surveyed description, with intent to deceive the person to whom such representation is made, or who, in reckless disregard of the truth, falsely represents to any such person that any tract of land shown to him is public land of the United States subject to sale, settlement, or entry, or that it is of a particular surveyed description, thereby deceiving the person to whom such representation is made, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than one year, or both.

(June 25, 1948, ch. 645, 62 Stat. 789; Pub. L. 103–322, title XXXIII, §330016(1)(F), Sept. 13, 1994, 108 Stat. 2147.)

#### Historical and Revision Notes

Based on title 18, U.S.C., 1940 ed., §114 (Feb. 23, 1917, ch. 115, 39 Stat. 936).

Words "deemed guilty of a misdemeanor and" which preceded "punished" were omitted as unnecessary in view of definitive section 1 of this title.

Minor changes were made in phraseology.

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

1994—Pub. L. 103–322 substituted "fined under this title" for "fined not more than $300".
§ 7.142 Class designations. The following class designations may be used in accordance with this section: ( a ) Any malt beverage, as defined in § 7.1, may be designated simply as a “malt beverage.”
( b ) ( 1 ) The class designations “beer,” “ale,” “porter,” “stout,” “lager,” and “malt liquor” may be used to designate malt beverages that contain at least 0.5 percent alcohol by volume and that conform to the trade understanding of those designations. These designations may be preceded or followed by descriptions of the color of the product (such as “amber,” “brown,” “red,” or “golden”) as well as descriptive terms such as “dry,” “export,” “cream,” and “pale.”
( 2 ) No product other than a malt beverage fermented at a comparatively high temperature, possessing the characteristics generally attributed to “ale,” “porter,” or “stout” and produced without the use of coloring or flavoring materials (other than those recognized in standard brewing practices) may bear any of these class designations.
###### Editorial Note on Part 71

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 71 appear by T.D. ATF-414, 64 FR 49084, Sept. 10, 1999and T.D. ATF-463, 66 FR 42734, 42735, Aug. 15, 2001.

#### § 71.105 Administrative law judge's finding and decision or recommended decision.

Within a reasonable time after the conclusion of the hearing, and as expeditiously as possible, the administrative law judge shall render his decision or recommended decision, as the case may be. All decisions shall become a part of the record and, if proposed findings and conclusions have been filed, shall show the administrative law judge's ruling upon each of such proposed findings and conclusions. Decisions shall consist of (a) a brief statement of the issues of fact involved in the proceeding; (b) the administrative law judge's findings and conclusions, as well as the reasons or basis therefor with record references, upon all the material issues of fact, law or discretion presented on the record (including, when appropriate, comment as to the credibility and demeanor of the witnesses); and (c) the administrative law judge's determination or recommended determination on the record. Where the administrative law judge determines that the imposition of a period of suspension of the permit is appropriate, his decision shall state the length of such period of suspension, to commence at such time as the appropriate TTB officer shall specify.

[21 FR 1441, Mar. 6, 1956. Redesignated at 40 FR 16835, Apr. 15, 1975, as amended by T.D. ATF-374, 61 FR 29957, June 13, 1996]
Editorial Note on Part 4
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 4 appear by T.D. ATF-425, 65 FR 11890, Mar. 7, 2000.

§ 4.92 Alternative names permitted for temporary use. The following alternative names shown in the left column may be used as the type designation for American wine in lieu of the name of the grape variety shown in the right column. Alternative names listed in the left column may only be used for wine bottled prior to the date indicated. ( a ) *Wines bottled prior to January 1, 1997.* Alternative Name/Name *Baco 1—Baco noir* *Baco 22A—Baco blanc* *Bastardo—Trousseau* *Black Spanish—Lenoir* *Burdin 7705—Florental* *Cayuga—Cayuga White* *Chancellor noir—Chancellor* *Chasselas—Chasselas doré* *Chevrier—Sémillon* *Chelois noir—Chelois* *Couderc 71-20—Couderc noir* *Couderc 299-35—Muscat du Moulin* *Foch—Maréchal Foch* *Franken Riesling—Sylvaner* *Gutedel—Chasselas doré* *Ives Seedling—Ives* *Jacquez—Lenoir* *Joannes Seyve 26-205—Chambourcin* *Landot 244—Landal* *Landot 4511—Landot noir* *Millot—Leon Millot* *Moore's Diamond—Diamond* *Norton Seedling—Norton* *Pfeffer Cabernet—Cabernet Pfeffer* *Pineau de la Loire—Chenin blanc* *Pinot Chardonnay—Chardonnay* *Ravat 262—Ravat noir* *Ruländer—Pinot gris* *Seibel 128—Salvador* *Seibel 1000—Rosette* *Seibel 4986—Rayon d'Or* *Seibel 5279—Aurore* *Seibel 5898—Rougeon* *Seibel 7053—Chancellor* *Seibel 8357—Colobel* *Seibel 9110—Verdelet* *Seibel 9549—De Chaunac* *Seibel 10878—Chelois* *Seibel 13053—Cascade* *Seibel 14596—Bellandais* *Seyve-Villard 5-276—Seyval* *Seyve-Villard 12-309—Roucaneuf* *Seyve-Villard 12-375—Villard blanc* *Seyve-Villard 18-283—Garronet* *Seyve-Villard 18-315—Villard noir* *Seyve-Villard 23-410—Valerien* *Sweetwater—Chasselas doré* *Verdelet blanc—Verdelet* *Vidal 256—Vidal blanc* *Virginia Seedling—Norton* *Wälschriesling—Welsch Rizling* *Welschriesling—Welsch Rizling*
( b ) *Wines bottled prior to January 1, 1999.* Alternative Name/Name *Cabernet—Cabernet Sauvignon* *Grey Riesling—Trousseau gris* *Muscat Frontignan—Muscat blanc* *Muscat Pantelleria—Muscat of Alexandria* *Napa Gamay—Valdiquié* *Pinot Saint George—Négrette* *Sauvignon vert—Muscadelle*
( c ) *Wines bottled prior to January 1, 2006.* Alternative Name/Name *Johannisberg Riesling—Riesling*
( d ) *Wines bottled prior to* October 29, 2012.
Alternative Name/Name *Agwam—Agawam*
[T.D. ATF-370, 61 FR 539, Jan. 8, 1996, as amended by T.D. ATF-417, 64 FR 49388, Sept. 13, 1999; T.D. TTB-95, 76 FR 66629, Oct. 27, 2011]
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Transportation

###### Office of the Secretary 

                    Notice of Applications for Certificates of Public Convenience and Necessity and Foreign Air Carrier Permits Filed Under Subpart B (formerly Subpart Q) during the Week Ending March 5, 2011. The following Applications for Certificates of Public Convenience and Necessity and Foreign Air Carrier Permits were filed under Subpart B (formerly Subpart Q) of the Department of Transportation's Procedural Regulations (                    *See*14 CFR 301.201*et seq.*).                 

The due date for Answers, Conforming Applications, or Motions To Modify Scope are set forth below for each application. Following the Answer period DOT may process the application by expedited procedures. Such procedures may consist of the adoption of a show-cause order, a tentative order, or in appropriate cases a final order without further proceedings. 

*Docket Number:*                     DOT-OST-2010-0093.                 

*Date Filed:*                     February 28, 2011.                 

*Due Date for Answers, Conforming Applications, or Motion To Modify Scope:*                     March 21, 2011.                 

*Description:*                     Amendment No. 2 of Open Joint Stock Company Transaero Airlines (“Transaero”) to its application for a  foreign air carrier permit to include a request for authority for Transaero to provide scheduled foreign air transportation of persons, property, and mail (i) from any point or points behind the Russian Federation, via any  point or points in the Russian Federation and intermediate points, to Los Angeles, California, and (ii) from Los Angeles, California, to any point or points in the Russian Federation and beyond.                 

Renee V. Wright, 

Program Manager, Docket Operations, Federal Register Liaison.

[FR Doc. 2011-8698 Filed 4-11-11; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4910-9X-P
#### Warner-Quinlan Asphalt Company, Appellant, v. John N. Carlisle, as Commissioner of the New York State Highway Commission, Respondent. (Action No. 2.)

Order reversed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and motion granted, without costs, on the opinion in *Warner-Quinlan Asphalt Co.*v. *Carlisle, Nos. 1 &%*(158 App. Div. 638), decided herewith. All concurred.
the doctrine of law of the case, Hall v. State, 91 Nev. 314, 315-16, 535 P.2d 

797, 798-99 (1975), and the district court did not err in denying this claim. 

Accordingly, we 

ORDER the judgment of the district court AFFIRMED. 

/ 

Hardesty 

cc: Hon. Linda Marie Bell, District Judge 

Kenwon Montgomery 

Attorney General/Carson City 

Clark County District Attorney 

Eighth District Court Clerk 

J. 

2
#### John YOUNG, Appellant, v. CITY OF ST. CHARLES, Missouri; David King, Individually and in his official capacity as former Chief of Police of the City of St. Charles, Missouri; Jack Banas, Individually and in his official capacity as former Police Captain of the City of St. Charles, Missouri; James Gooch, Individually and in his official capacity as Police Captain of the City of St. Charles, Missouri, Appellees.

No. 02-1372.

United States Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit.

Submitted May 2, 2002.

Decided May 9, 2002.

Before WOLLMAN, FAGG, and MORRIS SHEPPARD ARNOLD, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

John Young was terminated from his position as a police officer with the St. Charles, Missouri police department. Young brought two lawsuits contending the city’s termination of his employment deprived him of his federal constitutional rights. The first lawsuit was dismissed, and the district court concluded the second lawsuit was barred by res judicata (claim preclusion). Young appeals pro se.

Because Young alleges federal constitutional violations, we apply the federal law of claim preclusion. *Canady v. Allstate Ins. Co.,*282 F.3d 1005, 1014 (8th Cir. 2002). Claim preclusion bars a later lawsuit if “(1) a court of competent jurisdiction rendered the prior judgment, (2) the prior judgment was a final judgment on the merits, and (3) both cases involved the same cause of action and the same parties.” *Id.*Young does not dispute the district court’s jurisdiction or that the district court’s dismissal was a final judgment on the merits.

Young asserts his second cause of action is different from the first. As this court explained in *Canady,*however, “[t]he same cause of action framed in terms of a new legal theory is still the same cause of action.” *Id.*at 1015 (quoting *NAACP v. Metropolitan Council,*125 F.3d 1171, 1174 (8th Cir.1997)). Whether Young frames his due process claim as a Fourteenth Amendment property deprivation (as in the first lawsuit) or a Fifth Amendment liberty deprivation (as in the second lawsuit), he seeks to remedy the same wrong-his allegedly unconstitutional dismissal from the St. Charles police force. Thus, Young’s cause of action is the same in his first and second suits.

Further, the two new defendants in the second lawsuit-both employees of the police department-are in privity with parties to the first lawsuit. *See Harmon Ind., Inc. v. Browner,*191 F.3d 894, 903 (8th Cir.1999). In their official capacities, the two new defendants have the same legal interests as the city. In their individual capacities, the two new defendants are in privity with an individual defendant who was employed in a similar position of authority in the police department.

For the reasons explained above, Young’s claim is properly barred because of claim preclusion. We affirm the decision of the district court.

A true copy.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

DAY ELEV

 360.11

 360.11

 360.11

 360.13

 360.11

 360.11

 360.11

 360.11

 360.11

 360.11

 360.11

 360.11

 360.11

 360.11

 360.11

 360.11

 360.11

 360.11

 360.11

 360.11

 360.11

 360.11

 360.11

 360.11

 360.08

 360.11

 360.11

 360.08

 360.08

 360.11

 545

 545

 545

 546

 545

 545

 545

 545

 545

 545

 545

 545

 545

 545

 545

 545

 545

 545

 545

 545

 545

 545

 545

 545

 543

 545

 545

 543

 543

 545

STORAGE

-1

+0

+0

+1

-1

+0

+0

+0

+0

+0

+0

+0

+0

+0

+0

+0

+0

+0

+0

+0

+0

+0

+0

+0

-2

+2

+0

-2

+0

+2

CHANGE

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 353

 352

 351

 354

 355

 355

 354

 350

 355

 351

 350

 352

 350

 354

 351

 356

 354

 352

 356

 358

 353

 354

 353

 351

 353

 356

 353

 353

 353

 353

SPILL

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

OUTLET

OAKDALE IRRIGATION DISTRICT

SOUTH SAN JOAQUIN IRRIGATION DISTRICT

TRI DAMS PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

NOVEMBER 2005 GOODWIN RESERVOIR DAILY OPERATIONS RUN DATE: March 14, 2006

RES.

ACRE-FEET

RELEASE - C.F.S. 

TOTALS -1 0 10,595 0

ACRE-FEET -1 0 21,015 0

SUMMARY

RELEASE (ACRE-FEET)

JOINT MAIN CANAL 0

SOUTH MAIN CANAL 0

 21,015

 546

OUTLET 0

TOTAL 

TULLOCH

RELEASE

 397

 395

 398

 396

 392

 391

 390

 389

 388

 385

 393

 401

 400

 404

 396

 396

 394

 392

 392

 394

 391

 396

 390

 393

 396

 400

 397

 395

 393

 393

 11,827

 23,459

JOINT MAIN OPERATED BY SSJID AND OID.

JOINT

MAIN

SOUTH

MAIN

SPILL 21,015

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

RIVER CANALS

Table 14
#### § 72.1 Procedures relating to personal property and carriers.

Regulations in this part shall relate to personal property and carriers seized by alcohol, tobacco and firearms officers as subject to forfeiture as being involved, used, or intended to be used, as the case may be, in any violation of Federal laws.
Editorial Note on Part 555
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 555 appear by T.D. ATF-487, 68 FR 3748, Jan. 24, 2003.

§ 555.205 Movement of explosive materials. All explosive materials must be kept in locked magazines meeting the standards in this subpart unless they are: ( a ) In the process of manufacture;
( b ) Being physically handled in the operating process of a licensee or user;
( c ) Being used; or
( d ) Being transported to a place of storage or use by a licensee or permittee or by a person who has lawfully acquired explosive materials under § 555.106.
###### Editorial Note on Part 40

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 40 appear by T.D. ATF-460, 66 FR 39094-39096, July 27, 2001; T.D. ATF-464, 66 FR 43479, Aug. 20, 2001; and T.D. TTB-91, 76 FR 5479, Feb. 1, 2011.

#### § 40.499 Notice of contemplated disapproval.

If the appropriate TTB officer has reason to believe that the applicant is not entitled to a permit, the appropriate TTB officer will promptly give to the applicant notice of the contemplated disapproval of the application and opportunity for hearing thereon in accordance with part 71 of this chapter. If, after such notice and opportunity for hearing, the appropriate TTB officer finds that the applicant is not entitled to a permit, an order will be prepared stating the findings on which the permit request is denied.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY HIGH

 1,463

 1,435

 1,408

 1,391

 1,435

 1,499

 1,631

 1,765

 1,903

 1,884

 1,858

 1,796

 1,745

 1,939

 1,734

 1,645

 1,664

 1,604

 1,620

 1,675

 1,669

 1,642

 1,655

 1,617

 1,699

 1,626

 1,564

 1,479

 1,409

 1,372

 1,354

 1,019

 1,011

 992

 1,011

 1,024

 1,037

 1,075

 1,075

 1,104

 1,109

 1,106

 1,098

 1,098

 1,153

 1,171

 1,116

 1,124

 1,122

 1,147

 1,176

 1,159

 1,079

 1,101

 1,158

 1,182

 1,182

 1,135

 1,121

 1,119

 1,108

 1,081

 1,195

 1,165

 1,166

 1,186

 1,213

 1,242

 1,310

 1,358

 1,400

 1,401

 1,391

 1,368

 1,353

 1,470

 1,391

 1,322

 1,319

 1,308

 1,339

 1,378

 1,337

 1,326

 1,343

 1,344

 1,405

 1,348

 1,303

 1,270

 1,244

 1,247

 1,231

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

OCTOBER 2014 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: November 3, 2014

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

FARRAR PARK AT DUTCH SLOUGH
**CERTIFICATIONS**Exhibit 31.1I, S. W. Yong, certify that:1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Trio-Tech International, a Californiacorporation;2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact oromit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstancesunder which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by thisreport;3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included inthis report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operationsand cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;4. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:     (a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls andprocedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating tothe registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within thoseentities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;     (b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures andpresented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls andprocedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and     (c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourthfiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonablylikely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and     5. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the auditcommittee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):     (a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation ofinternal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect theregistrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and     (b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have asignificant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.Dated: November 21, 2005                                                 /s/ S. W. YONG   S. W. Yong, Chief Executive Officer   and President (Principal Executive Officer)