alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
United States Court of Appeals

FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________

No. 99-4140

___________

United States of America, *

*

Appellee, * Appeal from the United States

* District Court for the Western

v. * District of Missouri.

*

Enoch A. Montaque, * [UNPUBLISHED]

*

Appellant. *

___________

Submitted: July 5, 2000

Filed: July 11, 2000

___________

Before McMILLIAN, BRIGHT, and FAGG, Circuit Judges.

___________

PER CURIAM.

Enoch A. Montaque appeals the district court's imposition of sentence upon

Montaque's guilty plea to possessing with intent to distribute cocaine, in violation of

21 U.S.C. § 841(a)(1). On appeal, Montaque's counsel moved to withdraw and filed

a brief under Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Counsel's brief raises one

issue: whether the court erroneously counted Montaque's 1979 murder conviction

toward his career-offender status, essentially because Montaque was sentenced for the

conviction more than 15 years before he committed the current offense. We affirm.
-2-

Initially, we note that Montaque qualifies as a career offender even without the

murder conviction, because two later controlled-substance felonies and a battery felony

in Montaque's criminal history support career-offender status. See U.S. Sentencing

Guidelines Manual §§ 4B1.1, 4B1.2 (1998). Nevertheless, state correctional records

confirm that Montaque's parole on the murder conviction was revoked in 1985 and

1988, bringing the conviction within the 15-year "look-back" period. See U.S.

Sentencing Guidelines Manual § 4A1.2(e)(1) (1998) (count any earlier sentence of 13

months, whenever imposed, resulting in defendant's incarceration during any part of 15-

year period preceding current offense).

Having reviewed the record and finding no other nonfrivolous issues, see Penson

v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75 (1988), we affirm and grant counsel's motion to withdraw.

A true copy.

Attest:

CLERK, U.S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.
<PAGE>   1
                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.1


                         INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' CONSENT


     We consent to the incorporation by reference in Post-Effective Amendment
No. 1 to Registration Statement No. 333-42004, Post-Effective Amendment No. 1 to
Registration Statement No. 33-67102, Registration Statement No. 333-16249,
Registration Statement No. 333-37445 and Registration Statement No. 333-82343 of
Herbalife International, Inc. all on Form S-8 and in Post-Effective Amendment
No. 2 to Registration Statement No. 33-48580 and Registration Statement No.
333-46201 of Herbalife International, Inc. on Form S-3 of our report dated
February 22, 2000 appearing in this Annual Report on Form 10-K of Herbalife
International, Inc. for the year ended December 31, 1999.


DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP
Los Angeles, California
March 27, 2000
January 2022

STORAGE INFLOW- C.F.S. RELEASE - C.F.S. GAINS(+)

ACRE-FEET O'NEILL S.LUIS CALIF. O'NEILL

S.LUIS DOS AMIGOS * OR LOSS

(-)

DAY ELEV IN LAKE CHANGE PUMPING GEN. AQUEDUCT GEN. PUMPING PUMPING DELIV. C.F.S.

46,547

1 220.29 43,905 -2,642 1,506 0 989 0 3,679 0 -148

2 219.54 41,964 -1,941 1,671 0 1,520 0 3,605 418 -145

3 220.15 43,541 1,577 2,923 0 2,620 0 4,700 0 -47

4 221.14 46,128 2,587 3,300 0 1,131 0 3,183 0 56

5 221.35 46,679 551 3,169 0 2,775 0 5,737 0 72

6 220.88 45,446 -1,233 3,258 0 1,582 0 5,120 262 -79

7 221.24 46,390 944 3,285 0 2,002 0 4,050 683 -78

8 220.81 45,263 -1,127 3,297 0 1,906 0 5,663 0 -108

9 220.13 43,489 -1,774 3,310 0 1,956 0 6,050 0 -111

10 220.10 43,411 -78 3,302 0 1,935 0 4,840 316 -121

11 220.47 44,374 963 3,304 0 2,068 0 4,840 0 -46

12 221.37 46,731 2,357 3,287 0 2,027 0 4,143 0 18

13 221.54 47,178 447 3,223 0 2,064 0 4,608 316 -137

14 221.32 46,600 -578 3,224 0 2,211 0 5,604 0 -122

15 221.11 46,049 -551 3,250 0 2,213 0 5,559 0 -182

16 220.71 45,001 -1,048 3,257 0 2,103 0 5,638 106 -146

17 220.25 43,801 -1,200 3,281 0 2,145 0 5,607 290 -134

18 219.88 42,841 -960 3,310 0 1,947 0 5,429 152 -160

19 219.92 42,945 104 3,326 0 1,827 0 4,570 418 -112

20 220.37 44,114 1,169 3,307 0 1,897 0 4,570 0 -44

21 220.91 45,525 1,411 3,278 0 2,045 0 4,570 0 -42

22 221.98 48,334 2,809 3,244 0 1,973 0 3,847 0 46

23 221.80 47,861 -473 3,227 0 2,093 0 5,366 78 -114

24 222.17 48,836 975 3,206 0 1,916 0 4,555 213 138

25 222.25 49,049 213 3,230 0 1,824 0 4,490 320 -137

26 222.17 48,836 -213 3,116 0 1,798 0 4,490 433 -99

27 222.00 48,385 -451 2,498 0 2,406 0 5,127 0 -5

28 221.77 47,782 -603 2,554 0 2,846 0 5,367 211 -127

29 221.89 48,098 316 2,540 0 2,905 0 4,765 521 -1

30 221.35 46,679 -1,419 2,542 0 2,978 0 5,553 538 -145

31 221.74 47,703 1,024 2,525 0 2,955 0 4,958 9 3

TOTALS 1,156 93,750 0 64,657 0 150,283 5,284 -2,257

ACRE-FEET 1,156 185,961 0 128,247 0 298,089 10,482 161 -4,481

* DAILY DEL. FIGURES UNAVAILABLE. TOT. DEL. IS INCLUDED IN COMPUTING MONTHLY TOTALS

SUMMARY

Release (ACRE-FEET)

O'Neill Generation 0 Dos Amigos Pump 10,482

San Luis Pump 298,089 Deliveries 161

Total 308732

Historical Archive and Report Database

Consolidated State-Federal O'Neill Forebay 

Daily Operations

Run Date: 1/3/2024
### §6575. Prohibition against Federal mandates, direction, or control

Nothing in this subchapter shall be construed to authorize an officer or employee of the Federal Government to mandate, direct, or control a State, local educational agency, or school's specific instructional content, academic achievement standards and assessments, curriculum, or program of instruction.

(Pub. L. 89–10, title I, §1604, formerly §1905, as added Pub. L. 107–110, title I, §101, Jan. 8, 2002, 115 Stat. 1619; renumbered §1604, Pub. L. 114–95, title I, §1501(a)(5), Dec. 10, 2015, 129 Stat. 1906.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Prior Provisions

A prior section 1604 of Pub. L. 89–10 was classified to section 6514 of this title, prior to repeal by Pub. L. 114–95.

Another prior section 1604 of Pub. L. 89–10 was classified to section 6514 of this title, prior to the general amendment of this subchapter by Pub. L. 107–110.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

DAY HIGH

 177

 174

 175

 182

 181

 178

 181

 187

 186

 190

 189

 164

 174

 174

 176

 178

 167

 178

 175

 168

 164

 175

 170

 175

 178

 179

 179

 179

 179

 185

 172

 170

 166

 172

 168

 168

 172

 171

 180

 174

 169

 153

 159

 163

 167

 163

 154

 160

 159

 155

 152

 162

 163

 167

 168

 169

 168

 172

 172

 170

 174

 172

 173

 176

 175

 174

 175

 178

 183

 183

 179

 159

 165

 168

 170

 171

 159

 167

 168

 163

 160

 167

 168

 170

 175

 173

 174

 175

 176

 177

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

NOVEMBER 2000 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: December 11, 2000

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

GREENS LANDING ON THE SACRAMENTO RIVER
**EXHIBIT
        32.2**





CERTIFICATION
      OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER


PURSUANT
      TO


18
      U.S.C.
      SECTION 1350,


AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




In
      connection with the report of Advanced Biotherapy, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form
      10-KSB/A for the year ended December 31, 2006, as filed with the Securities
      and
      Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Periodic Report”), I, Michael G.
      Bansley, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
      Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
      of
      2002, that:




|1. | the
              Periodic Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
              or
              15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
              and
|-- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|2. | the
              information contained in the Periodic Report fairly presents, in all
              material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
              of
              the Company.
|-- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



Dated:  May
      8,
      2007


/s/ Michael
                G. BansleyMichael
                    G. Bansley, Chief Financial
                    Officer
(No. 74-CC-629

#### Memorial Medical Center, Claimant, *vs.*State of Illinois, Department of Children and Family Services, Respondent.

*Opinion filed June 26, 1974.*

Brown, Hay & Stephens, Attorney for Claimant.

William J. Scott, Attorney General; Howard W. Feldman, Assistant Attorney General, for Respondent.

Per Curiam.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY ELEV

 949.16

 949.23

 949.25

 949.26

 949.34

 949.33

 949.38

 949.39

 949.39

 949.38

 949.38

 949.43

 949.41

 949.39

 949.35

 949.27

 949.23

 949.13

 949.19

 949.11

 949.03

 948.95

 948.92

 948.87

 948.80

 948.84

 948.69

 948.61

 948.55

 948.60

 948.67

 1,049.3

 1,049.8

 1,050.0

 1,050.0

 1,050.6

 1,050.5

 1,050.9

 1,051.0

 1,051.0

 1,050.9

 1,050.9

 1,051.3

 1,051.1

 1,051.0

 1,050.7

 1,050.1

 1,049.8

 1,049.1

 1,049.5

 1,048.9

 1,048.3

 1,047.7

 1,047.5

 1,047.1

 1,046.6

 1,046.9

 1,045.8

 1,045.2

 1,044.8

 1,045.1

 1,045.6

STORAGE

+0.7

+0.5

+0.1

+0.1

+0.6

-0.1

+0.4

+0.1

+0.0

-0.1

+0.0

+0.4

-0.1

-0.1

-0.3

-0.6

-0.3

-0.7

+0.4

-0.6

-0.6

-0.6

-0.2

-0.4

-0.5

+0.3

-1.1

-0.6

-0.4

+0.4

+0.5

CHANGE

422

386

371

346

336

354

357

294

368

277

292

220

393

291

396

251

307

306

293

296

291

258

277

374

237

338

263

377

299

724

433

INFLOW

 60

 106

 274

 287

 12

 360

 143

 235

 356

 297

 282

 25

 442

 361

 508

 527

 431

 629

 27

 562

 550

 533

 360

 535

 470

 102

 770

 623

 475

 465

 158

POWER

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

SPILL

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

OUTLET

 24

 17

 22

 22

 24

 31

 26

 22

 12

 17

 10

 7

 26

 5

 38

 24

 26

 53

 41

 34

 41

 24

 29

 26

 29

 86

 53

 53

 48

 72

 14

C.F.S.

 .10

 .07

 .09

 .09

 .10

 .13

 .11

 .09

 .05

 .07

 .04

 .03

 .11

 .02

 .16

 .10

 .11

 .22

 .17

 .14

 .17

 .10

 .12

 .11

 .12

 .36

 .22

 .22

 .20

 .30

 .06

INCHES

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .01

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .80

 .17

PRECIP

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

JANUARY 2014 NEW MELONES LAKE DAILY OPERATIONS RUN DATE: February 27, 2014

IN LAKE

EVAPORATION

INCHES

C.F.S.

COMPUTED*

1000 ACRE-FEET

RELEASE - C.F.S.

TOTALS -2.8 10,427 10,965 0 0 956 3.98 .98

ACRE-FEET -2,800 20,682 21,749 0 0 1,896

COMMENTS:

* COMPUTED INFLOW IS THE SUM OF CHANGE IN STORAGE, RELEASES AND EVAPORATION.

SUMMARY

RELEASE (ACRE-FEET)

POWER 21,749

SPILL 0

OUTLET

TOTAL

 0

 21,749

PRECIPITATION

THIS MONTH =

TO DATE =

 .98

JULY 1, 2013 3.77

 1,048.6

Table 13
EXHIBIT 11

                         J. BAKER, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

                    Computation of Primary and Fully Diluted Earnings Per Share*

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>

                                                                      Year Ended

                                               January 29,           January 30,          January 31,
                                                  2000                 1999                  1998
                                                  ----                 ----                  ----
<S>                                            <C>                   <C>                  <C>
Net Earnings Per Common Share:
-----------------------------

Net earnings, basic and diluted                $ 8,872,610           $ 2,033,518          $ 3,813,107
                                                ==========            ==========           ==========

Weighted average common

    shares outstanding, basic                   14,065,734            14,006,478           13,911,080

Effect of dilutive securities:
    Stock options and performance share awards     307,538              133,257                59,219
                                               -----------           ----------            ----------
Weighted average common

    shares outstanding, diluted                 14,373,272            14,139,735           13,970,299
                                                ==========            ==========           ==========

Net earnings per common share, basic                 $0.63                 $0.15                $0.27
                                               ===========           ===========           ==========
Net earnings per common share, diluted               $0.62                 $0.14                $0.27
                                               ===========           ===========           ==========
</TABLE>


* This calculation is submitted in accordance with Item 601(b)(11) of Regulation
S-K.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY HIGH

 10,644

 7,891

 10,430

 10,229

 5,117

 4,268

 3,993

 3,771

 4,508

 6,457

 7,295

 4,644

 7,271

 8,906

 10,590

 9,172

 8,859

 8,563

 10,735

 6,569

 8,011

 7,165

 6,471

 6,343

 7,769

 7,607

 10,657

 11,229

 10,669

 9,919

 11,263

 1,513

 1,213

 1,039

 1,693

 1,241

 706

 721

 684

 841

 859

 1,268

 918

 884

 1,250

 1,175

 1,599

 1,832

 1,485

 1,603

 1,887

 1,595

 1,544

 1,732

 1,571

 1,724

 2,038

 2,108

 2,219

 2,260

 2,777

 2,469

 4,533

 3,885

 4,674

 4,712

 2,402

 2,028

 1,780

 1,797

 2,341

 3,171

 3,320

 2,314

 2,946

 4,037

 4,556

 4,841

 4,885

 4,396

 4,842

 3,954

 3,767

 3,874

 3,584

 3,525

 3,885

 4,219

 5,137

 5,696

 5,854

 6,210

 5,898

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

JANUARY 2007 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: February 2, 2007

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

PITTSBURG BOTTOM ON THE SACRAMENTO RIVER
###### Editorial Note on Part 479

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 479 appear by T.D. ATF-487, 68 FR 3752, Jan. 24, 2003.

#### § 479.43 Changes through bankruptcy of owner.

A receiver or referee in bankruptcy may continue the business under the stamp issued to the taxpayer at the place and for the period for which the tax was paid. An assignee for the benefit of creditors may continue business under his assignor's special tax stamp without incurring additional special (occupational) tax liability. In such cases, the change shall be registered with ATF in a manner similar to that required by § 479.42.

[36 FR 14256, Aug. 3, 1971. Redesignated at 40 FR 16835, Apr. 15, 1975, and amended by T.D. ATF-251, 52 FR 19334, May 22, 1987]
§ 10.501 What medical evidence is necessary to support continuing receipt of compensation benefits? ( a ) The employee is responsible for providing sufficient medical evidence to justify payment of any compensation sought. ( 1 ) To support payment of continuing compensation where an employee has been found entitled to periodic benefits, narrative medical evidence must be submitted whenever OWCP requests it but ordinarily not less than once a year and with any filing of a form CA-1032. It must contain a physician's rationalized opinion as to whether the specific period of alleged disability is causally related to the employee's accepted injury or illness.
( 2 ) For those employees with more serious conditions not likely to improve and for employees over the age of 65, OWCP may require less frequent documentation, but ordinarily not less than once every three years.
( 3 ) The physician's opinion must be based on the facts of the case and the complete medical background of the employee, must be one of reasonable medical certainty and must include objective findings in support of its conclusions. Subjective complaints of pain are not sufficient, in and of themselves, to support payment of continuing compensation. Likewise, medical limitations based solely on the fear of a possible future injury are also not sufficient to support payment of continuing compensation. See § 10.330 for a fuller discussion of medical evidence.
( b ) OWCP may require any kind of non-invasive testing to determine the employee's functional capacity. Failure to undergo such testing will result in a suspension of benefits. In addition, OWCP may direct the employee to undergo a second opinion or referee examination in any case it deems appropriate (see §§ 10.320 and 10.321).
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit 

## FILED August 20, 2003 Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 03-50392 Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus FAUSTINO PENAGOS-MENDEZ, also known as Hugo Campos-Nieto, Defendant-Appellant.

-------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas USDC No. EP-02-CR-1800-ALL-PM

-------------------- Before JONES, WIENER, and BENAVIDES, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: * Faustino Penagos-Mendez appeals the sentence imposed following his guilty plea conviction of being found in the United States after deportation/removal in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326. Penagos contends that 8 U.S.C. § 1326(a) and 8 U.S.C. § 1326(b) define separate offenses. He argues that the prior conviction that resulted in his increased sentence is an element of a separate offense under 8 U.S.C. § 1326(b) that should have beenNo. 03-50392 -2- alleged in his indictment. Penagos maintains that he pleaded guilty to an indictment which charged only simple reentry under 8 U.S.C. § 1326(a). He argues that his sentence exceeds the two-year maximum term of imprisonment which may be imposed for that offense. Alternatively, he argues that construing 8 U.S.C. § 1326(b) as a sentence-enhancement provision renders the statute unconstitutional.
In Almendarez-Torres v. United States , 523 U.S. 224, 235 (1998), the Supreme Court held that the enhanced penalties in 8 U.S.C. § 1326(b) are sentencing provisions, not elements of separate offenses. The Court further held that the sentencing provisions do not violate the Due Process Clause. Id. at 239-47. Penagos acknowledges that his arguments are foreclosed by Almendarez-Torres , but asserts that the decision has been cast into doubt by Apprendi v. New Jersey , 530 U.S. 466, 490 (2000). He seeks to preserve his arguments for further review. Apprendi did not overrule Almendarez-Torres
. See Apprendi , 530 U.S. at 489-90; United States v. Dabeit , 231 F.3d 979, 984 (5th Cir. 2000). This court must follow Almendarez-Torres “unless and until the Supreme Court itself determines to overrule it.” Dabeit , 231 F.3d at 984 (internal quotation marks and citation omitted). The judgment of the district court is
AFFIRMED. The Government has moved for a summary affirmance in lieu of filing an appellee’s brief. In its motion, the Government asks that an appellee’s brief not be required. The motion is GRANTED.
AFFIRMED; MOTION GRANTED.
<PAGE>
                                   EXHIBIT 23

                        PENNROCK FINANCIAL SERVICES CORP.

(Letterhead of Simon Lever & Company appears here)

                          INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' CONSENT

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the registration statement of
PennRock Financial Services Corp. on Form S-3 (No. 33-10568) and Form S-8 (No.
333-99797) of our report dated January 29, 2003 on the consolidated financial
statements of PennRock Financial Services Corp. and subsidiaries appearing in
and incorporated by reference in this Annual Report on Form 10-K.


                                           /s/ SIMON LEVER & COMPANY

Lancaster, Pennsylvania
March 11, 2003
#### § 5.126 Depictions of government symbols.

*Representations of the armed forces and flags.* Distilled spirits labels, containers, or packaging may not show an image of any government's flag or any representation related to the armed forces of the United States if the representation, standing alone or considered together with any additional language or symbols on the label, creates a false or misleading impression that the product was endorsed by, made by, used by, or made under the supervision of, the government represented by that flag or by the armed forces of the United States. This section does not prohibit the use of a flag as part of a claim of American origin or another country of origin.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

DAY

 19,467

 19,529

 19,270

 19,062

 18,953

 18,311

 17,425

 16,692

 16,281

 16,444

 16,255

 16,126

 15,439

 15,536

 15,025

 14,509

 14,191

 14,027

 13,771

 13,257

 12,909

 12,644

 12,368

 11,946

 11,997

 11,792

 11,236

 11,043

 10,902

 25,294

 25,335

 25,673

 25,951

 26,128

 26,883

 27,890

 28,710

 29,193

 29,151

 29,598

 29,975

 30,991

 31,394

 31,905

 32,617

 33,120

 33,492

 33,954

 34,666

 35,217

 35,670

 36,171

 36,846

 36,998

 37,408

 38,201

 38,559

 38,948

STORAGE - A.F. 

 44,761

 44,864

 44,943

 45,013

 45,081

 45,194

 45,315

 45,402

 45,474

 45,595

 45,853

 46,101

 46,430

 46,930

 46,930

 47,126

 47,311

 47,519

 47,725

 47,923

 48,126

 48,314

 48,539

 48,792

 48,995

 49,200

 49,437

 49,602

 49,850

244

418

372

377

386

343

394

397

316

350

293

383

595

346

357

191

353

236

278

329

484

150

337

257

304

288

282

265

747

308

470

412

412

420

400

455

441

352

411

423

508

761

598

357

290

446

341

382

429

586

245

450

385

406

391

401

348

872

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

FEBRUARY 2012 FULL NATURAL FLOW AT NEW MELONES DAM RUN DATE: 08/02/2012

TOTALS +5,216 12,700

* October 1, 25,190

 137.5

 138.5

 139.3

 140.1

 140.9

 141.7

 142.6

 143.5

 144.2

 145.0

 145.8

 146.9

 148.4

 149.5

 150.3

 150.8

 151.7

 152.4

 153.2

 154.0

 155.2

 155.7

 156.5

 157.3

 158.1

 158.9

 159.7

 160.4

 162.1

DONNELLS

RES

BEARDSLEY

RES

2011 TO DATE

NEW

MELONES

INFLOW

C.F.S

NATURAL

RIVER

C.F.S

ACCUM *

FULL

NATURAL

1000 A.F.

RESERVOIR

TOTAL

+127

+103

+79

+70

+68

+113

+121

+87

+72

+121

+258

+248

+329

+500

+0

+196

+185

+208

+206

+198

+203

+188

+225

+253

+203

+205

+237

+165

+248

CHANGE

A.F. C.F.S.

+64

+52

+40

+35

+34

+57

+61

+44

+36

+61

+130

+125

+166

+252

+0

+99

+93

+105

+104

+100

+102

+95

+113

+128

+102

+103

+119

+83

+125