alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 7.52 Legibility and other requirements for mandatory information on labels. ( a ) *Readily legible.* Mandatory information on labels must be readily legible to potential consumers under ordinary conditions.
( b ) *Separate and apart.* Subject to the exceptions below, mandatory information on labels, except brand names, must be separate and apart from any additional information. ( 1 ) This does not preclude the addition of brief optional phrases of additional information as part of the class or type designation (such as “premium malt beverage”), the name and address statement (such as “Proudly brewed and bottled by ABC Brewing Co. in Pittsburgh, PA, for over 30 years”), or other information required by § 7.63(a). The statements required by § 7.63(b) may not include additional information.
( 2 ) Mandatory information (other than an aspartame declaration required by § 7.63(b)(4)) may be contained among other descriptive or explanatory information if the script, type, or printing of the mandatory information is substantially more conspicuous than that of the descriptive or explanatory information.
( c ) *Contrasting background.* Mandatory information must appear in a color that contrasts with the background on which it appears, except that if the net contents or the name and address are blown into a glass container, they need not be contrasting. The color of the container and of the malt beverages must be taken into account if the label is transparent or if mandatory label information is etched, engraved, sandblasted, or otherwise carved into the surface of the container or is branded, stenciled, painted, printed, or otherwise directly applied on to the surface of the container. Examples of acceptable contrasts are: ( 1 ) Black lettering appearing on a white or cream background; or
( 2 ) White or cream lettering appearing on a black background.
( d ) *Capitalization.* Except for the aspartame statement when required by § 7.63(b)(4), which must appear in all capital letters, mandatory information may appear in all capital letters, in all lower case letters, or in mixed-case using both capital and lower-case letters.
475 P.2d 51

#### STATE of New Mexico, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Willie S. MARTINEZ, Defendant-Appellant. STATE of New Mexico, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Mike MARTINEZ, Defendant-Appellant.

Nos. 514, 515.

Court of Appeals of New Mexico.

Sept. 18, 1970.

Eugene E. Brockman, Tucumcari, for appellants.

James A. Maloney, Atty. Gen., Santa Fe, Frank N. Chavez, Asst. Atty. Gen., for appellee.

OPINION

WOOD, Judge.

The defendant in each of these cases was convicted of burglary. Each moved for post-conviction relief under § 21-1-1 (93), N.M.S.A.1963 (Supp.1969). Each motion was denied without a hearing; each defendant appeals asserting he was entitled to an evidentiary hearing on his motion.

Mike’s claim for relief is that he was “Mentally harassed into fear of my life— at the age of nineteen year’s old — (A minor) — and charged convicted and sentenced through trickery of public — and court officials — to a term of five yerr’s [sic] in the Penitentary [sic] of New Mexico— against constitutional law and safegards [sic] — of the Unite [sic] States of America — .” Willie’s motion makes the same *52claim except that he asserts he was seventeen years old.

What form did the harassment take? What resulted to each defendant’s detriment as a result of the assorted fear? What trickery and by whom? How did the asserted trickery affect each defendant? The records show that each defendant was represented by counsel and was convicted after a jury trial. The claims made are factually insufficient. They are too vague to state a basis for post-convicti°n relief. Pena v. State, 81 N.M. 331, 466 P.2d 897 (Ct.App.1970) and cases therein cited.

The order denying relief in each case is affirmed.

js so ordered.

OMAN and HENDLEY, JJ., concur.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

DAY ELEV

 529.01

 527.93

 526.93

 525.95

 525.18

 524.18

 523.19

 522.05

 520.78

 519.73

 519.35

 518.94

 518.65

 517.84

 517.10

 516.32

 515.86

 515.70

 515.43

 515.14

 514.60

 514.02

 513.41

 512.90

 512.51

 512.05

 511.73

 511.16

 510.83

 510.37

 311.3

 307.4

 303.7

 300.2

 297.5

 293.9

 290.4

 286.4

 282.0

 278.4

 277.1

 275.7

 274.8

 272.0

 269.5

 266.9

 265.4

 264.8

 263.9

 263.0

 261.2

 259.3

 257.3

 255.6

 254.4

 252.9

 251.8

 250.0

 248.9

 247.5

STORAGE

-3.0

-3.9

-3.6

-3.5

-2.7

-3.5

-3.5

-4.0

-4.4

-3.6

-1.3

-1.4

-1.0

-2.7

-2.5

-2.6

-1.5

-0.5

-0.9

-1.0

-1.8

-1.9

-2.0

-1.7

-1.3

-1.5

-1.0

-1.8

-1.1

-1.5

CHANGE

2,388

1,904

1,702

1,410

1,876

1,732

1,900

1,724

1,526

1,248

1,766

1,330

1,667

883

1,011

820

1,009

1,255

1,218

1,390

1,039

1,060

1,024

910

944

974

1,469

1,137

1,567

1,388

INFLOW

 643

 636

 619

 609

 623

 644

 633

 650

 625

 613

 613

 237

 233

 235

 264

 286

 258

 258

 260

 261

 261

 271

 263

 251

 254

 267

 289

 289

 277

 286

MADERA

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

SPILL

 2,859

 2,865

 2,509

 2,182

 2,241

 2,491

 2,627

 2,700

 2,748

 2,081

 1,425

 1,412

 1,551

 1,652

 1,618

 1,473

 1,142

 888

 1,029

 1,240

 1,297

 1,380

 1,390

 1,116

 946

 1,078

 1,315

 1,390

 1,431

 1,460

FRIANT-KERN

 38

 41

 48

 43

 46

 34

 48

 33

 26

 23

 34

 39

 32

 32

 35

 28

 32

 26

 30

 24

 30

 22

 25

 27

 29

 28

 32

 30

 39

 32

C.F.S.

 .32

 .35

 .41

 .37

 .40

 .30

 .42

 .29

 .23

 .21

 .31

 .35

 .29

 .29

 .32

 .26

 .30

 .24

 .28

 .22

 .28

 .21

 .24

 .26

 .28

 .27

 .31

 .29

 .38

 .31

INCHES

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

PRECIP

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

SEPTEMBER 2010 MILLERTON LAKE DAILY OPERATIONS RUN DATE: October 1, 2010

IN LAKE

EVAPORATION

INCHES

C.F.S.

COMPUTED*

1000 ACRE-FEET

RELEASE - C.F.S. 

TOTALS -66.8 41,271 11,908 51,536 0 986 8.99 .00

ACRE-FEET -66,813 81,861 23,620 102,222 0 1,956

COMMENTS:

* COMPUTED INFLOW IS THE SUM OF CHANGE IN STORAGE, RELEASES, PUMPING AND EVAPORATION.

SUMMARY

RELEASE (ACRE-FEET)

CANALS

FRIANT-KERN

MADERA

 102,222

 23,620 146,722

PRECIPITATION

THIS MONTH =

JULY 1, 2010 TO DATE = 0.00

 314.3

 20,880 0.00

CANALS

AT FRIANT

TOTAL RELEASES

OUTLET

 349

 349

 351

 352

 352

 352

 351

 351

 344

 350

 350

 349

 348

 350

 352

 350

 351

 351

 351

 351

 350

 350

 352

 355

 353

 353

 353

 353

 353

 351

RIVER

 10,527

 20,880

RIVER
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

DAY ELEV

 221.65

 221.97

 222.14

 221.00

 221.40

 222.03

 221.84

 221.73

 220.41

 220.33

 219.30

 219.33

 220.35

 221.76

 223.30

 224.10

 223.77

 223.46

 222.64

 221.78

 220.25

 220.86

 221.22

 221.64

 221.77

 222.96

 222.46

 222.44

 223.50

 223.05

 47,467

 48,308

 48,756

 45,760

 46,810

 48,464

 47,966

 47,677

 44,218

 44,009

 41,349

 41,426

 44,062

 47,756

 51,848

 53,996

 53,108

 52,276

 50,086

 47,809

 43,801

 45,394

 46,338

 47,441

 47,782

 50,939

 49,607

 49,554

 52,384

 51,180

STORAGE

+1,103

+841

+448

-2,996

+1,050

+1,654

-498

-289

-3,459

-209

-2,660

+77

+2,636

+3,694

+4,092

+2,148

-888

-832

-2,190

-2,277

-4,008

+1,593

+944

+1,103

+341

+3,157

-1,332

-53

+2,830

-1,204

CHANGE

318

138

90

358

126

49

479

112

211

561

3

603

1,400

2,408

2,611

2,515

1,688

1,191

1,173

1,231

1,414

1,456

1,116

621

445

295

590

773

671

484

PUMPING

 857

 1,356

 1,430

 1,354

 1,235

 1,494

 1,614

 540

 959

 887

 932

 1,309

 922

 1,252

 1,096

 0

 1,284

 1,280

 1,037

 1,185

 1,679

 451

 411

 590

 693

 577

 691

 1,378

 75

 532

PUMPING

 1,620

 405

 619

 1,618

 1,205

 0

 1,612

 0

 996

 1,975

 2,598

 1,560

 975

 0

 2,355

 2,846

 2,939

 2,587

 2,313

 2,180

 3,421

 1,492

 1,492

 1,125

 505

 762

 2,842

 2,109

 1,802

 2,609

PUMPING

 0

 0

 131

 105

 177

 238

 44

 48

 68

 0

 153

 121

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

GEN.

*

-123

-229

-30

-59

-98

-136

-108

-47

+68

-22

-75

+55

-126

-136

-151

-16

-57

+23

+92

+51

+20

+68

-75

+120

-279

+31

-57

+142

-8

+31

OR

UNITED STATES 

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION

CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT

CONSOLIDATED STATE-FEDERAL O'NEILL FOREBAY October 20, 2014

DAILY OPERATIONS

SEPTEMBER 2014 RUN DATE:

IN LAKE GEN.

ACRE-FEET O'NEILL

RELEASE - C.F.S. 

TOTALS +4,816 25,130 1,085 48,562 29,100 -1,131

ACRE-FEET +4,816 49,845 2,152 96,323 57,720

SUMMARY

 412

RELEASE (ACRE-FEET)

O'NEILL GEN. 2,152

SAN LUIS PUMP 96,323 412

 46,364

DOS AMIGOS PUMP 57,720

DELIVERIES 

S. LUIS O'NEILL

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

CALIF. DOS AMIGOS

AQUEDUCT

2,837

2,276

2,345

1,267

3,118

2,654

2,649

378

0

2,217

2,414

2,370

1,952

842

3,054

1,430

2,143

2,233

981

935

1,646

1,223

1,339

1,530

1,204

2,605

2,329

2,546

2,641

2,019

 57,177

 113,411

S. LUIS

DELIV.

GAINS(+)

LOSS(-)

C.F.S.

INFLOW - C.F.S.

STATE OF CALIFORNIA

THE RESOURCES AGENCY

DEPARTMENT OF WATER RESOURCES

STATE WATER PROJECT

TOTAL 156,607

-2,243

* DAILY DEL. FIGURES UNAVAILABLE. TOT. DEL. IS INCLUDED IN COMPUTING MONTHLY TOTALS
### Part C—Education of Migratory Children
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY ELEV

 515.25

 515.22

 515.55

 515.47

 515.32

 515.25

 515.18

 515.19

 515.20

 515.23

 515.35

 515.50

 515.59

 515.59

 515.70

 515.75

 515.86

 516.34

 516.86

 517.33

 518.13

 518.90

 519.70

 520.70

 521.53

 522.25

 523.12

 523.86

 524.58

 525.30

 525.97

 263.3

 263.2

 264.3

 264.1

 263.6

 263.3

 263.1

 263.1

 263.2

 263.3

 263.7

 264.2

 264.5

 264.5

 264.8

 265.0

 265.4

 267.0

 268.7

 270.3

 273.0

 275.6

 278.3

 281.8

 284.6

 287.1

 290.2

 292.8

 295.3

 297.9

 300.3

STORAGE

+0.4

-0.1

+1.1

-0.3

-0.5

-0.2

-0.2

+0.0

+0.0

+0.1

+0.4

+0.5

+0.3

+0.0

+0.4

+0.2

+0.4

+1.6

+1.7

+1.6

+2.7

+2.6

+2.7

+3.4

+2.9

+2.5

+3.0

+2.6

+2.5

+2.6

+2.4

CHANGE

575

321

917

220

111

236

238

370

381

403

557

604

508

355

540

441

539

1,176

1,235

1,167

1,716

1,676

1,739

2,087

1,797

1,614

1,896

1,663

1,643

1,647

1,557

INFLOW

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

MADERA

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

SPILL

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

FRIANT-KERN

 4

 18

 11

 1

 10

 2

 4

 2

 13

 2

 5

 1

 5

 3

 4

 5

 3

 14

 4

 16

 0

 8

 11

 4

 0

 1

 10

 1

 10

 8

 1

C.F.S.

 .04

 .17

 .10

 .01

 .09

 .02

 .04

 .02

 .12

 .02

 .05

 .01

 .05

 .03

 .04

 .05

 .03

 .13

 .04

 .15

 .00

 .07

 .10

 .04

 .00

 .01

 .09

 .01

 .09

 .07

 .01

INCHES

 .15

 .59

 .00

 .00

 .05

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .04

 .00

 .00

 .45

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .06

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .40

 .21

 .72

 .01

 .43

 .48

 .00

 .03

 .00

 .00

 .00

PRECIP

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

DECEMBER 2012 MILLERTON LAKE DAILY OPERATIONS RUN DATE: January 1, 2013

IN LAKE

EVAPORATION

INCHES

C.F.S.

COMPUTED*

1000 ACRE-FEET

RELEASE - C.F.S. 

TOTALS +37.4 29,929 0 0 0 181 1.70 3.62

ACRE-FEET +37,386 59,364 0 0 0 359

COMMENTS:

* COMPUTED INFLOW IS THE SUM OF CHANGE IN STORAGE, RELEASES, PUMPING AND EVAPORATION.

SUMMARY

RELEASE (ACRE-FEET)

CANALS

FRIANT-KERN

MADERA

 0

 0 21,618

PRECIPITATION

THIS MONTH =

JULY 1, 2012 TO DATE = 7.62

 262.9

 21,618 3.62

CANALS

AT FRIANT

TOTAL RELEASES

OUTLET

 353

 353

 353

 353

 352

 351

 351

 351

 351

 351

 351

 352

 352

 352

 352

 352

 352

 354

 354

 354

 354

 349

 349

 351

 351

 352

 353

 349

 348

 349

 350

RIVER

 10,899

 21,618

RIVER
#### William M. Moore Construction Co., Inc., Appellant, v. United States Fidelity and Guarantee Company, Respondent.

No opinion. Present—Martin, P. J., Townley, Glennon, Cohn and Callahan, JJ. Glennon and Cohn, JJ., concur on the ground that it appears from the uncontradicted evidence that plaintiff had been notified by defendant in October, 1933, of the entry of the judgment on the cross-complaint. Plaintiff is, accordingly, barred from maintaining this action against defendant by virtue of the two-year period of limitation contained in the policy of insurance.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM PAN
INTERNATIONAL GAMING, INC. AND SUBSIDIARY - AUDITED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS FOR THE YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1999, 1998 AND 1997 AND IS QUALIFIED
IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FORM 10-KSB FOR THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31,
1999.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1999
<CASH>                                              89
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                    89
<PP&E>                                       1,066,706
<DEPRECIATION>                               1,066,706
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 541,204
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          722,315
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         4,508
<OTHER-SE>                                   2,225,115
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   541,204
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (364,942)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          (364,942)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (364,942)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (.081)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (.081)


</TABLE>
484 P.2d 374

#### STATE of New Mexico, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Joe LYNCH, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 573.

Court of Appeals of New Mexico.

April 9, 1971.

Mary C. Walters, Toulouse, Moore & Walters, Albuquerque, for defendant-appellant.

James A. Maloney, Atty. Gen., John A. Darden, Asst. Atty. Gen., Santa Fe, for plaintiff-appellee.

OPINION

HENDLEY, Judge.

Defendant was convicted in Magistrate Court of the crime of injury to animals. Section 40A-18-2, N.M.S.A. 1953 (Repl. Vol. 1964). The conviction was appealed de novo to the District Court and affirmed. Defendant’s appeal presents four points for reversal. The issue of jurisdiction is dis-positive of the appeal.

We reverse.

*Magistrate Court Jurisdiction.*

The jurisdiction of magistrate courts in criminal matters is limited to “ * * * cases of misdemeanors where the punishment prescribed by law is a fine of one hundred dollars ($100) or less, or imprisonment for six [6] months or less, or where fine or imprisonment or both are prescribed but neither exceeds these máximums.” Section 36-3-4, N.M.S.A. 1953, (Repl. Vol. 1964, Supp. 1969).

The penalty for the violation of the statute under which defendant was convicted is prescribed by § 40A-29-4, subd. A, N.M.S.A. 1953 (Repl. Vol. 1964), imprisonment “ * * * in the county j ail for a definite term less than one [1] year, or to the payment of a fine of not more than one thousand dollars ($1,000), or to both such imprisonment and fine in the discretion of the judge.” The Magistrate Court could proceed as provided in § 36-3-4(B), supra, but it was without jurisdiction to try defendant.

Since the Magistrate Court was without subject-matter jurisdiction, there *533is no possibility of waiver or consent to jurisdiction. State ex rel. Overton v. New Mexico State Tax Commission, 81 N.M. 28, 462 P.2d 613 (1970). Thus, the magistrate proceedings were void and defendant’s conviction therein a nullity.

*District Court Jurisdiction.*

Section 36-15-3, subd. A, N.M.S.A. 1953 (Repl. Vol. 1964, Supp.1969) states:

> “Appeals from the magistrate court shall be determined by trial de novo in the district court, *and all laws, rules and regulations governing the magistrate court shall govern the trial in the district court.”*(Emphasis added).

Thus, on appeals from a magistrate court, the district court becomes a court of limited jurisdiction for the purpose of the appeal and the trial de novo. See Sanchez v. Reilly, 54 N.M. 264, 221 P.2d 560 (1950); Pointer v. Lewis, 25 N.M. 260, 181 P. 428 (1919); Barruel v. Irwin, 2 N.M. (Gild.) 223 (1882); City of Albuquerque v. Sanchez, 81 N.M. 272, 466 P.2d 118 (Ct.App.1970). If the magistrate court lacked jurisdiction the district court suffered the same lack of jurisdiction. Geren & Hammond v. Lawson, 25 N.M. 415, 184 P. 216 (1919); Pointer v. Lewis, supra; Chaves v. Perea, 3 N.M. (Gild.) 89, 2 P. 73 (1884).

Reversed and remanded with directions to set aside the conviction, judgment and sentence.

It is so ordered.

SPIESS, C. J., and WOOD, J., concur.
EXHIBIT 23  Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
  /s/ Ernst & Young LLP 
 17
§ 9.140 Atlas Peak. ( a ) *Name.* The name of the viticultural area described in this section is “Atlas Peak.”
( b ) *Approved maps.* The appropriate maps of determining the boundaries of the Atlas Peak viticultural area are two U.S.G.S. maps. They are entitled: ( 1 ) “Yountville, Calif.,” 7.5 minute series, edition of 1951, (photorevised 1968); and
( 2 ) “Capell Valley, Calif.,” 7.5 minute series, edition of 1951, (photorevised 1968).
( c ) *Boundaries.* The Atlas Peak viticultural area is located in Napa County, California. It lies entirely within the Napa Valley viticultural area. The beginning point is Haystack (peak) found in section 21, T. 7 N., R. 4 W. on the “Yountville” U.S.G.S. map; ( 1 ) From the beginning point, the boundary proceeds south in a straight line approximately 0.5 miles, to the highest point of an unnamed peak of 1443 feet elevation on the boundary of sections 21 and 28, T. 7 N., R. 4 W.;
( 2 ) Then southeast in a straight line approximately one mile to an unnamed pass with an elevation of 1485 feet, located on Soda Canyon Road;
( 3 ) Then easterly in a straight line approximately 0.5 miles to an unnamed peak of 2135 feet elevation;
( 4 ) Then in a generally southeasterly direction, as a series of five straight lines connecting the highest points of unnamed peaks with elevations of 1778, 2102, 1942, 1871 and 1840 feet, ending in the center of section 2, T. 6 N., R. 4 W.;
( 5 ) Then southeast in a straight line approximately 1.8 miles to the highest point of an unnamed peak of 1268 feet elevation in section 12, T. 6 N., R. 4 W. on the Capell Valley U.S.G.S. map;
( 6 ) Then east-southeast in a straight line approximately 1.1 miles to the point where an unnamed tributary stream enters Milliken Creek, immediately south of the Milliken Reservoir in section 7, T. 6 N., R. 3 W.;
( 7 ) Then following the unnamed stream east-northeast approximately 0.5 miles to its source;
( 8 ) Then northeast in a straight line approximately 0.5 miles, through the highest point of an unnamed peak of 1846 feet elevation, to the 1600 foot contour line in the eastern portion of section 8, T. 6 N., R. 3 W.;
( 9 ) Then following the 1600 foot contour line generally north and west for approximately 10 miles, to the point of intersection with the boundary line between sections 12 and 13, T. 7 N., R. 4 W. on the Yountville U.S.G.S. map;
( 10 ) Then following the section boundary line west approximately 1.1 miles to the intersection with an unnamed, unimproved road;
( 11 ) Then northwest in a straight line approximately 0.7 miles to the highest point of an unnamed peak of 2114 feet elevation, located in section 10, T. N., R. 4 W.;
( 12 ) Then northwest in a straight line approximately 0.7 miles to the highest point of an unnamed peak of 2023 feet elevation, located in section 10, T. N., R. 4 W.;
( 13 ) Then southwest in a straight line approximately 2.2 miles to Haystack (peak), the point of beginning.
[T.D. ATF-320, 57 FR 2681, Jan. 22, 1992]
§ 9.94 Howell Mountain. ( a ) *Name.* The name of the viticultural area described in this section is “Howell Mountain.”
( b ) *Approved maps.* The appropriate maps for determining the boundaries of the Howell Mountain viticultural area are four U.S.G.S. topographic maps in the 7.5 minute series, as follows: ( 1 ) “Detert Reservoir, CA.,” 1959 (photorevised 1980).
( 2 ) “Aetna Springs, CA.,” 1958 (photorevised 1981).
( 3 ) “Calistoga, CA.,” 1958 (photorevised 1980).
( 4 ) “St. Helena, CA.,” 1960 (photorevised 1980).
( c ) *Boundaries.* The Howell Mountain viticultural area is located in Napa County, California, and is part of the Napa Valley viticultural area. The exact boundaries of the viticultural area, based on landmarks and points of reference found in the approved maps, as follows: ( 1 ) Beginning at the 1,400 foot contour line at the intersection of Sections 15 and 16 in R6W/T9N of the Detert Reservoir Quadrangle U.S.G.S. map.
( 2 ) Then continuing in an east and southeast direction along the 1,400 foot contour line to the southeast corner of Section 23 in R5W/T8N.
( 3 ) Then in a generally northwest direction along the 1,400 foot contour line until it intersects the line between Sections 21 and 22 in R6W/T9N.
( 4 ) Then north along the Section 21/22 boundary line to the starting point at the 1,400 foot contour line.
[T.D. ATF-163, 48 FR 57487, Dec. 30, 1983, as amended by T.D. ATF-249, 52 FR 5960, Feb. 27, 1987]