alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EX-10.7



 Exhibit 10.7 

RAPID7, INC. 
 2015 BONUS
PLAN 
 Overview 
 The 2015 Bonus Plan (the
“Plan”) of Rapid7, Inc. (the “Company”) is designed to motivate, retain and reward its management through financial performance-based incentive compensation. The members of the Company’s
management team (each a “Participant”) designated by the Company’s Board of Directors or the Compensation Committee thereof (collectively, the “Committee”) in its sole discretion, employed at the
Company during 2015, shall be eligible to participate in the Plan. The Plan is administered by the Committee in its sole discretion. For purposes of this Plan, “2015” shall mean the calendar year ending December 31,
2015. 
 The Plan is designed to award a cash incentive payment (each a “Cash Payment”) for performance in 2015 to a Participant
based on the Company’s achievement of a revenue-related performance objective set by the Committee (the “Revenue Target”) and the Committee’s evaluation of the Participant’s contribution toward the achievement
of the Revenue Target. 
 Determination of 2015 Cash Payments 

Each Participant is eligible to receive a Cash Payment under the Plan if the Company achieves its Revenue Target. For 2015, the target amount of the Cash
Payment a Participant may receive upon achievement of the Revenue Target shall be set by the Committee (the “Cash Payment Target Amount”). A Participant may be eligible to receive more or less than his or her Cash Payment
Target Amount as described more fully below. 
 The Committee has set the Revenue Target for the Participants. The Committee has also set a hurdle revenue
amount for 2015 for the award of any Cash Payment (the “Threshold”) to the Participants. If the Company’s revenue is less than the Threshold, no Participant will receive any portion of his or her Cash Payment. If the
Company’s revenue exceeds the Threshold, but falls below the Revenue Target, each Participant shall be entitled to a Cash Payment equal to a portion of his or her Cash Payment Target Amount in such amount as determined by the Committee. If the
Company’s revenue exceeds the Revenue Target, each Participant shall be entitled to a Cash Payment greater than his or her Cash Payment Target Amount in such amount as determined by the Committee, but not greater than 120% of his or her Cash
Payment Target Amount. 
 The actual Cash Payments to be made to Participants hereunder for 2015 shall be made at the discretion of the Committee. 

Miscellaneous Provisions 
 Cash Payments under this Plan
shall be made on such schedule as may be approved by the Committee in its sole discretion. 
 Participation in the Plan shall not alter in any way the at
will nature of the Company’s employment of a Participant, and such at will employment may be terminated at any time for any reason, with or without cause and with or without prior notice. 

The Committee may amend or terminate this Plan at any time. Further, the Committee may modify the Revenue Target and/or the Cash Payment Target Amount, at any
time. 
 The Plan shall be interpreted in accordance with Delaware law without reference to conflicts of law principles.
Regulatory Evaluation

Docket No. FAA- Directorate Identifier: 2012-SW-025-AD

If you make changes to the values in the table below, you must ensure the totals update accordingly. If 

they do not, click (or Tab) into and then out of the changed cell.

Estimated Costs:

Action

(e.g., Inspection,

replacement)

Do not include oncondition costs here

Costs per Product (e.g., aircraft, engine,

propeller, appliance)

Work-hours

(include

access, testing,

and close-up)

Labor

cost

(@$85/h

our)

Parts Cost Total Costs

(labor +

parts)

Number of

U.S.

Registered

Products

Total Cost

for U.S. Fleet

initial inspection 0.5 $ 42.50 $ 42.50 60 $2,550.00

modification 1.0 $ 85.00 $500 $ 585.00 60 $35,100.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

The known number of products in compliance:

Total Costs of compliance for U.S. fleet: $37,650

Costs covered under warranty (if known) $

On-Condition Costs:

Action

(e.g., Inspection,

replacement)

Work-hours

(include access,

testing, and closeup)

Labor cost

(@$85/hour)

Parts Cost Cost per Product

$ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00

Special considerations for Economic Analysis (Use this field to explain anything in the Estimated Costs table 

that was assumed or might not be obvious. This field can also be used to explain warranty costs):
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

DAY ELEV

 1,901.24

 1,901.18

 1,901.04

 1,900.94

 1,901.00

 1,901.23

 1,901.32

 1,901.39

 1,901.41

 1,901.31

 1,901.40

 1,901.11

 1,901.16

 1,901.16

 1,901.29

 1,901.33

 1,901.39

 1,901.39

 1,901.09

 1,901.00

 1,901.03

 1,901.09

 1,901.32

 1,901.51

 1,901.38

 1,901.14

 1,901.47

 1,901.38

 14,091

 14,046

 13,941

 13,867

 13,911

 14,083

 14,150

 14,203

 14,218

 14,143

 14,210

 13,993

 14,031

 14,031

 14,128

 14,158

 14,203

 14,203

 13,978

 13,911

 13,933

 13,978

 14,150

 14,292

 14,195

 14,016

 14,263

 14,195

STORAGE

-29

-45

-105

-74

+44

+172

+67

+53

+15

-75

+67

-217

+38

+0

+97

+30

+45

+0

-225

-67

+22

+45

+172

+142

-97

-179

+247

-68

CHANGE

345

358

308

563

689

448

393

390

368

326

395

327

336

320

377

340

385

392

277

358

401

409

468

464

344

895

1,377

905

INFLOW

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

POWER

 140

 140

 139

 138

 142

 142

 140

 142

 140

 144

 142

 140

 142

 146

 154

 151

 144

 140

 139

 139

 137

 139

 138

 140

 141

 141

 138

 140

SPILL

 160

 160

 160

 160

 158

 160

 160

 160

 160

 160

 160

 158

 160

 160

 160

 160

 160

 160

 160

 160

 160

 160

 160

 160

 160

 160

 160

 160

OUTLETS

 0

 1

 1

 1

 1

 0

 0

 1

 1

 1

 0

 0

 1

 0

 0

 0

 0

 1

 0

 1

 1

 0

 0

 1

 1

 0

 1

 1

C.F.S.

 .01

 .06

 .04

 .05

 .03

 .00

 .02

 .06

 .04

 .05

 .01

 .01

 .06

 .00

 .00

 .02

 .00

 .03

 .00

 .06

 .06

 .00

 .05

 .05

 .05

 .00

 .05

 .06

INCHES

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

FEBRUARY 2009 LEWISTON LAKE DAILY OPERATIONS RUN DATE: March 1, 2009

IN LAKE

EVAPORATION

C.F.S. FRANCIS CARR

COMPUTED*

ACRE-FEET

RELEASE - C.F.S. 

TOTALS +75 12,958 0 4,476 3,958 15 .87

ACRE-FEET +75 25,702 0 8,878 7,851 30

* COMPUTED INFLOW IS THE SUM OF CHANGE IN STORAGE, RELEASES AND EVAPORATION.

(1) OUTLET RELEASE INCLUDES THE CONTINUOUS FISH RELEASE OF 75 C.F.S.

(2) INCHES OF EVAPORATION TAKEN FROM PAN AT TRINITY RIVER HATCHERY

SUMMARY

RELEASE (ACRE-FEET)

TOTAL POWER 0

TOTAL RIVER 16,729 25,591

 14,120

 8,862

RIVER

JUDGE FRANCIS CARR POWERPLANT

TOTAL RELEASE

JUDGE (2)

(1) POWERPLANT

 60

 80

 61

 301

 366

 59

 59

 60

 59

 59

 59

 138

 14

 14

 14

 14

 58

 91

 91

 92

 92

 87

 83

 91

 91

 684

 953

 638

 4,468

 8,862
1 This memorandum opinion was not selected for publication in the New Mexico Reports. Please

2 see Rule 12-405 NMRA for restrictions on the citation of unpublished memorandum opinions. 

3 Please also note that this electronic memorandum opinion may contain computer-generated

4 errors or other deviations from the official paper version filed by the Court of Appeals and does

5 not include the filing date. 

6 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF NEW MEXICO

7 STATE OF NEW MEXICO,

8 Plaintiff-Appellee,

9 v. NO. 30,510

10 JESUS LODOZA,

11 Defendant-Appellant.

12 APPEAL FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF CHAVES COUNTY

13 Steven L. Bell, District Judge

14 Gary K. King, Attorney General

15 Santa Fe, NM

16 M. Anne Kelly, Assistant Attorney General

17 Albuquerque, NM

18 for Appellee

19 Hugh W. Dangler, Chief Public Defender

20 Santa Fe, NM

21 for Appellant

22 MEMORANDUM OPINION
2

1 CASTILLO, Judge.

2 Defendant appeals the district court’s dismissal of his de novo appeal and the

3 remand of his case to the magistrate court for imposition of the magistrate court’s

4 original judgment and sentence. In this Court’s notice of proposed summary

5 disposition, we proposed to reverse. The State has responded with a memorandum in

6 which it concedes that reversal for the reasons stated in our notice is appropriate.

7 Therefore, for the reasons stated in our notice of proposed summary disposition, we

8 reverse.

9 IT IS SO ORDERED.

10 ________________________________

11 CELIA FOY CASTILLO, Judge

12 WE CONCUR:

13 __________________________________

14 RODERICK T. KENNEDY, Judge

15 __________________________________

16 ROBERT E. ROBLES, Judge
Exhibit 10.27


                                 THIRD AMENDMENT
                             TO EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT
                               DATED APRIL 1, 1997



     Reference is made to the Executive  Employment  Agreement dated as of April
1, 1997 as amended on September 1, 1997 and March 31, 1998 (the  "Agreement") by
and between J. Baker,  Inc. and Alan I.  Weinstein.  Pursuant to paragraph 19 of
the  Agreement and in order to amend certain  provisions of the  Agreement,  the
Agreement is hereby amended as follows:

         1.  Paragraph 6 of the  Agreement  is hereby  amended by  deleting  the
phrase "ending on April 30, 2000" in the fifth line thereof and inserting in its
place the phrase "ending on April 30, 2001".

         2. Paragraph 9  subparagraph  (d) of the Agreement is hereby amended by
inserting the following at the end of such subparagraph:

                  ";  provided,  however,  that any such salary in excess of one
         (1)  year of Base  Salary  shall  be  offset  by any  salary  or  other
         compensation  earned by the Employee  from other  employment;  it being
         understood  that the Employee shall use reasonable  efforts to find new
         employment suitable to his training and experience."

         3. All other terms of the Agreement shall remain unchanged and continue
in full force and effect.




J. BAKER, INC.



By:/s/ Sherman N. Baker                            4/10/99
-----------------------                            -------
Sherman N. Baker                                   Date
Chairman of the Board



/s/Alan I Weinstein                                4/7/99
-------------------                                ------
Alan I. Weinstein                                  Date
Order filed January 13, 2022 

In The

Fourteenth Court of Appeals

____________

NO. 14-21-00591-CV

____________

NANCY PETRUCCIANI, Appellant

V.

RUSSELL A. PETRUCCIANI, Appellee

On Appeal from the 309th District Court

Harris County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 2007-51593

O R D E R

Appellant’s brief was due January 5, 2022. No brief or motion for extension 

of time has been filed. 

Unless appellant files a brief with this court on or before February 14, 

2022, the court will dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution. See Tex. R. App. P. 

42.3(b). 

PER CURIAM

Panel Consists of Justices Wise, Spain, and Hassan.
1 In The



### Court of Appeals

Ninth District of Texas at Beaumont

____________________

NO

. 09

- 1 6

- 00 252

- C V



### ____________________

MICHAEL DAVID BELLOW JR.

, Appellant

V.

COURTNEY BELLOW , Appellee

_______________________________________________________ ______________

On A ppeal from the 356th Di strict Court

Hardin County, Texas

Trial Cause No

. 54996

________________________________________________________ _____________

ORDER

Appellant, Michael David Bellow Jr., filed a notice of bankruptcy. See Tex.

R. App. P. 8.1. This proceeding is abated for administrative purposes only, and will

be treated as a closed case unless timely reinstated by proper motion. See Tex. R.

App. P. 8.2.

ORDER ENTERED October 13 , 201 6

.

PER CURIAM

Before McKeithen, C.J., Kreger and Horton, JJ.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1999
<CASH>                                         247,474
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  432,520
<ALLOWANCES>                                    33,317
<INVENTORY>                                    432,520
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             1,081,788
<PP&E>                                         212,558
<DEPRECIATION>                                  79,350
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               7,231,644
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          780,232
<BONDS>                                        531,097
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                     1,221,408
<OTHER-SE>                                     121,135
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 7,231,644
<SALES>                                      2,541,897
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             2,541,897
<CGS>                                        1,391,786
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                1,391,786
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               806,516
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              73,106
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                399,886
<INCOME-TAX>                                    73,318
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             85,199
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    85,199
<EPS-BASIC>                                          0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0


</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM FIRECOM,
INC.'S CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET, STATEMENT OF INCOME AND STATEMENT OF CASH
FLOW FOR THE PERIOD ENDED JANUARY 31, 1998, AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY
REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<RESTATED>
<MULTIPLIER>                    1,000
       
<S>                     <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                               9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                           APR-30-1997
<PERIOD-END>                                JAN-31-1998
<CASH>                                      3,546
<SECURITIES>                                0
<RECEIVABLES>                               3,186
<ALLOWANCES>                                464
<INVENTORY>                                 1,662
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            8,435
<PP&E>                                      1,320
<DEPRECIATION>                              769
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              9,183
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       2,085
<BONDS>                                     0
<COMMON>                                    69
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                       0
<PREFERRED>                                 0
<OTHER-SE>                                  4,623
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                9,183
<SALES>                                     10,170
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            10,170
<CGS>                                       5,779
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               5,779
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                            3,319
<LOSS-PROVISION>                            390
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                          102
<INCOME-PRETAX>                             580
<INCOME-TAX>                                273
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                         307
<DISCONTINUED>                              0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                             0
<CHANGES>                                   0
<NET-INCOME>                                307
<EPS-PRIMARY>                               .03
<EPS-DILUTED>                               .03
        

</TABLE>
Editorial Note on Part 41
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 41 (formerly part 275) appear at T.D. ATF-460, 66 FR 39093, July 27, 2001.

§ 41.181 Records of large cigars. Every person who imports large cigars for sale within the United States must keep such records as are necessary to establish and verify the sale price that applies to large cigars removed (entered or withdrawn). ( a ) *Basic record.* The importer must keep a record to show each sale price (as determined under § 41.39), which is applicable to large cigars removed. No later than the tenth business day in January of each year the importer must prepare such a record to show the sale price in effect on the first day of that year for each brand and size of large cigars. The importer must note any change in a price from that shown in the record within ten business days after such change in price. The record must be a continuing one for each brand and size of cigar (and type of packaging, if pertinent), so that the taxable price on any date may be readily ascertained. If an importer removes new types of large cigars after the beginning of the year, the importer must enter the sale price and its effective date for such large cigars in the basic record within ten business days after such removal.
( b ) *Copies of price announcements.* The importer must keep a copy of each general announcement that is issued internally or to the trade about establishment or change of large cigar sale prices. If the copy does not show the actual date when issued it must be annotated to show this information.
( c ) *Copies of entry and withdrawal forms.* The importer must keep a copy of each customs entry or withdrawal form on which internal revenue tax for large cigars is declared pursuant to § 41.81.
( d ) *Alternative record.* If an importer has so few import transactions and/or brands and sizes of large cigars that retention of an appropriate copy of each entry and withdrawal form required under paragraph (c) of this section will provide an adequate record of sale prices, then the record required under paragraph (a) of this section need not be kept. In such case the entry and withdrawal forms must identify the brands and sizes of cigars covered and show the corresponding quantity and sale price for each. If such information was not originally entered on the form it may be included by annotation. Whenever the appropriate TTB officer finds that alternative records being kept pursuant to this paragraph are inadequate for the intended purpose, he or she may so notify the importer in writing, after which time the importer must keep the record required under paragraph (a) of this section.
(Approved by the Office of Management and Budget under control number 1512-0368) [T.D. ATF-420, 64 FR 71944, Dec. 22, 1999. Redesignated and amended by T.D. TTB-16, 69 FR 52424, 52425, Aug. 26, 2004]
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY HIGH

 466

 468

 458

 440

 429

 403

 392

 383

 363

 343

 372

 360

 357

 334

 312

 300

 300

 305

 316

 303

 283

 294

 277

 277

 271

 260

 267

 245

 250

 236

 243

 401

 394

 383

 360

 343

 326

 315

 295

 288

 305

 296

 284

 290

 289

 277

 270

 271

 266

 266

 251

 258

 209

 217

 217

 214

 199

 210

 205

 207

 220

 226

 438

 436

 422

 398

 382

 362

 353

 346

 335

 325

 335

 327

 319

 310

 299

 288

 286

 282

 278

 274

 269

 255

 248

 244

 241

 230

 234

 227

 228

 229

 236

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

JANUARY 2002 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: February 12, 2002

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

FARRAR PARK AT DUTCH SLOUGH
§ 682.423 Guaranty agency Operating Fund. ( a ) *Establishment and control.* A guaranty agency must establish and maintain an Operating Fund in an account separate from the Federal Fund. Except for funds that may have been transferred from the Federal Fund, the Operating Fund is considered the property of the guaranty agency.
( b ) *Deposits.* The guaranty agency must deposit into the Operating Fund— ( 1 ) Amounts authorized by the Secretary to be transferred from the Federal Fund;
( 2 ) Account maintenance fees;
( 3 ) Loan processing and issuance fees;
( 4 ) Default aversion fees;
( 5 ) 30 percent of administrative cost allowances received on or after October 1, 1998 for loans upon which insurance was issued before October 1, 1998;
( 6 ) The portion of the amounts collected on defaulted loans that remains after the Secretary's share of collections has been paid and the complement of the reinsurance percentage has been deposited into the Federal Fund;
( 7 ) The agency's share of the payoff amounts received from the consolidation or rehabilitation of defaulted loans; and
( 8 ) Other receipts as authorized by the Secretary.
( c ) *Uses.* A guaranty agency may use the Operating Fund for— ( 1 ) Guaranty agency-related activities, including— ( i ) Application processing;
( ii ) Loan disbursement;
( iii ) Enrollment and repayment status management;
( iv ) Default aversion activities;
( v ) Default collection activities;
( vi ) School and lender training;
( vii ) Financial aid awareness and related outreach activities; and
( viii ) Compliance monitoring; and
( 2 ) Other student financial aid-related activities for the benefit of students, as selected by the guaranty agency.
(Authority: 20 U.S.C. 1072-2)
[64 FR 58635, Oct. 29, 1999, as amended at 78 FR 65820, Nov. 1, 2013]