alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### Union Pacific Railway Company v. Peter J. McNally.

Filed March 3, 1898.

No. 7880.

Publication of City Ordinance. In this case the sufficiency of the publication of an ordinance of South Omaha is presented under the same conditions as were described in *Union P. R. Oo. v. Montgomery,*49 Neb. 429, and the ruling in that case is accordingly followed.

Error from the district court of Douglas county. Tried below before Hopewell, J.

*Reversed.*

*W. R. Kelly, E. P. Smith,*and *John Schomp, for*plaintiff in error.

*Mahoney & Smyth, contra.*

Ryan, C.

In this case there was a verdict and judgment against the plaintiff in error for damages under circumstances *113very similar to those described in *Union P. R. Co. v. Montgomery,*49 Neb. 429. There was introduced in evidence an ordinance of the city of South Omaha containing the same provisions as those copied in the opinion in the above entitled case. There was the same objection as to the publication of said ordinance, which was overruled, and this ruling is assigned as error.

In *Union P. R. Co. v. Montgomery, supra,*the certificate as to the publication of the ordinance recited that it “was published in the South Omaha *Daily Stockman,** * * on the 5th day of September, A. D. 1888.” In the case now under consideration the certificate recited that the ordinance “was, on the 5th day of September, 1888, for the period of one day, published in the *Daily Stockman,*a newspaper, on said last, named day, within said city of South Omaha.” This case is therefore controlled by the reasoning in the case above cited, and accordingly the judgment of the district court herein is reversed.

Beversed and remanded.
Converted by EDGARwiz


M A R K  A S S I G N M E N T




Assignor: TRADEMARK HOLDINGS, LLC

Assignee: VODKA BRANDS CORP

Date: April 20, 2015







WITNESSETH

Whereas, ASSIGNOR is owner of the following mark applications and/or registrations (individually and collectively, each "MARK"):




			
	Mark




BLUE CRYSTAL

	Registration No.




3,490,176

	Registration Date




08/19/2008


	WHITE CRYSTAL

	2,993,050

	09/06/2005




ASSIGNOR is desirous of assigning ASSIGNEE all right, title and interest in each MARK to ASSIGNEE. ASSIGNEE is desirous of acquiring all right, title and interest in each MARK.




ASSIGNMENT




Now, for good and valuable consideration, the receipt thereof which is hereby acknowledged, and intending to be legally bound hereby, the parties agree as follows:




1.

ASSIGNOR does hereby assign, transfer and set over to the ASSIGNEE each aforementioned MARK, together with the goodwill of the business symbolized by each said MARK. The same to be held and enjoyed by ASSIGNEE for its own exclusive use and enjoyment, and for the use and enjoyment of its successors, assigns and other legal representatives, as fully and entirely as the same would have been held and enjoyed by the said ASSIGNOR if this assignment and sale had not been made. These rights are assigned together with all claims by ASSIGNOR for damages by reason of past infringement of each said MARK, with the right to sue for, and collect the same for its own use and benefit, and for the use and benefit of its successors, assigns or other legal representatives.


2.

ASSIGNOR will, by its officers, employees, legal representatives or other persons duly authorized, communicate to ASSIGNEE or the representatives thereof any facts known to it respecting each MARK, and will, upon request, testify in any legal proceedings, sign all lawful papers, make all rightful oaths, and generally do all other and further lawful acts, deemed necessary or expedient by said ASSIGNEE or by counsel for ASSIGNEE, to assist or enable said ASSIGNEE to obtain and enforce full benefits from the rights and interests herein assigned. ASSIGNOR additionally agrees to execute copies of this assignment or portions thereof regarding each aforementioned MARK, as required by ASSIGNEE in the future.




IN WITNESS WHEREOF, and with the intention of being legally bound, ASSIGNOR has caused this Assignment to be signed by its officer thereto duly authorized.










TRADEMARK HOLDINGS, LLC




BY: /s/ Mark Lucero, President
APPLICATIONUNDER THESMALLCOMMUNITYAIRSERVICEDEVELOPMENTPROGRAMARCATA/EUREKAAIRPORT 

# S UMMARY 

# I NFORMATION

A. Applicant Information:

( Check all that apply)

X Not a

Consortium Interstate

Consortium Intrastate

Consor tium

Community now receives EAS subsidy

X Community (or Consortium member) previously

received a Small Community Grant

If previous recipient

, d ate of grant: 09/17/ 2004

Expiration date of grant: 09/14/ 2006

Federal funds requested: $500,000

Carrier(s) s ervice obtained: Alaska Airlines

Destination(s) served: Los Angeles

B. Public/Private Partnerships:

(List organization names)

Public Private

Humboldt County

Arcata/Eureka Airport Redwood Region

Economic Development

Commission

C

. Project Proposal:

( C

heck all that apply)

X Marketing X Start

- Up Cost

Offset

Travel Bank X Secure Additional

Service

Surface

Transportation X New Route

X Launch New Carrier Subsidy

Study X Revenue

Guarantee

Upgrade Aircraft First Service

Service Restoration Oth er (specify): Regional Service

D. Existing Landing Aids at Local Airport:

X Full ILS X Published Instrument Approach

X Localizer X Outer/Middle Marker

X Other (specify): GPS E. Project Cost:

Line Description Sub

Total Total

Amount

1 Federal am ount

requested $750 ,000

2 State cash financial

contribution $0

Local cash financial

contribution

3a. Airport cash funds $ 27,6 00

3b. Non

- airport cash

funds $ 25 9,42 0

3 Total local cash funds

(3a+3b) $287,020

4 TOTAL CASH FUNDING

(1+2+3) $1, 0 37,02 0

In

- Kind contribution

5a. Airport In

- Kind

contribution ** $37,54 5

5b. Other In

- Kind

contribution** $ 73,800

5 TOTAL IN

- KIND

CONTRIBUTION

(5a+5b) $1 11,345

6 TOTAL PROJECT

COST (4+5) $ 1, 148 ,3 65

F. In

- Kind Contributions** :

For funds in li nes 5a (Airport In

- Kind contribution) and 5b

(Other In

- Kind contribution), please describe the source(s) of

fund(s) for each.

5a. L anding fee waiver ; program administration

5b. M arketing ; program administration

G. Is this application

subject to review by

State under Executive

Order 12372 process?

c. Program is not

covered by E.O.

12372.

H. Is the Applicant

delinquent on any

Federal debt? (if “yes”,

provide explanation)

No X X
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY HIGH

 894

 935

 938

 957

 929

 973

 924

 1,093

 1,096

 975

 1,104

 992

 920

 896

 946

 954

 834

 827

 818

 631

 676

 854

 868

 822

 845

 877

 905

 932

 932

 929

 898

 568

 523

 526

 485

 576

 464

 427

 585

 547

 517

 685

 561

 509

 495

 546

 536

 526

 712

 664

 603

 584

 510

 514

 507

 519

 510

 533

 520

 519

 560

 516

 742

 723

 727

 714

 767

 738

 615

 782

 844

 771

 878

 780

 673

 669

 727

 719

 624

 790

 722

 614

 600

 623

 665

 619

 613

 661

 673

 676

 715

 724

 617

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

MARCH 2012 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: May 18, 2012

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

DELTA MENDOTA CANAL AT CHECK 13 (O'NEILL)
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
STATEMENTS OF INCOME AND RETAINED EARNINGS FOR THE NINE MONTHS ENDED SEPTEMBER
30, 1998 AND 1997 AND FROM THE BALANCE SHEETS AT SEPTEMBER 30, 1998 AND DECEMBER
31, 1997 OF PACCAR FINANCIAL CORP. AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE
TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1998
<CASH>                                           9,610
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                2,480,896
<ALLOWANCES>                                    42,250
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                          41,330
<DEPRECIATION>                                  12,233
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               2,498,456
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0
<BONDS>                                        899,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                     31,000
<COMMON>                                        14,500
<OTHER-SE>                                     319,965
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 2,498,456
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               156,881
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   92,747
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                 7,760
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 35,944
<INCOME-TAX>                                    13,997
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             21,947
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    21,947
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
§ 9.270 Alisos Canyon. ( a ) *Name.* The name of the viticultural area described in this section is “Alisos Canyon”. For purposes of part 4 of this chapter, “Alisos Canyon” is a term of viticultural significance.
( b ) *Approved maps.* The two United States Geological Survey (USGS) 1:24,000 scale topographic maps used to determine the boundary of the Alisos Canyon viticultural area are titled: ( 1 ) Foxen Canyon, CA, 1995; and
( 2 ) Zaca Creek, Calif., 1959.
( c ) *Boundary.* The Alisos Canyon viticultural area is located in Santa Barbara County, California. The boundary of the Alisos Canyon viticultural area is as described below: ( 1 ) The beginning point is on the Foxen Canyon map at an unnamed hilltop with a marked elevation of 1,137 feet, located west of the Cañada de los Coches in the La Laguna Grant. From the beginning point, proceed east in a straight line for 3.71 miles to the intersection of two unnamed, unimproved roads north of Rancho San Juan; then
( 2 ) Proceed east-southeast in a straight line for approximately 1.2 miles to an unnamed hilltop with a marked elevation of 1,424 feet in the La Laguna Grant; then
( 3 ) Proceed southwest in a straight line for approximately 1.7 miles, crossing onto the Zaca Creek map, to a point designated “Oil,” adjacent to the north fork of San Antonio Creek and the intersection of three unnamed light-duty roads in the Cañada del Comasa, La Laguna Grant; then
( 4 ) Proceed west-southwest in a straight line for approximately 1.56 miles to the intersection of the north fork of San Antonio Creek and the 800-foot elevation contour in the Cañada del Comasa, La Laguna Grant; then
( 5 ) Proceed west in a straight line 1.95 miles to an unnamed rectangular structure northeast of the terminus of an unnamed, unimproved road north of U.S. Highway 101 and BM 684 in the La Laguna Grant; then
( 6 ) Proceed northwesterly in a straight line 0.32 mile to the intersection of Alisos Canyon Road and an unnamed, unimproved road east of the Cañada de los Coches in the La Laguna Grant; then
( 7 ) Proceed north-northwest in a straight line for 1.68 miles, crossing onto the Foxen Canyon map, to an unnamed hilltop with a marked elevation of 997 feet in the La Laguna Grant; then
( 8 ) Proceed northeast in a straight line for 0.5 mile to return to the beginning point.
[T.D. TTB 1611, 85 FR 52273, Aug. 25, 2020]
"r^RTMENTOF 

•-SPORTATION 

Before the United States Department of Transportation 

•! ^ ; .r, A W- U2 

Washington, DC 

February 17, 2011 

Essential Air Service at 

ALLIANCE, NEBRASKA 

CHADRON,NEBRASKA 

under49 U.S.C. 41731 et.seq. 

Docket OST-2000-8322 

This document contains the response of Great Lakes Aviation, Ltd. to Order Requesting 

Proposals 2011-1-10. 

Great Lakes Aviation, Ltd. is pleased to submit these proposals to provide essential air 

transportation to these Nebraska communities addressed in the Order as an Inseperable 

package. 

Great Lakes Aviation, Ltd. will provide service to these Nebraska communities as 

Great Lakes Airlines to Denver International Airport connecting with our code sharing 

partners beyond Denver to the extent of their route structures. In addition. Great Lakes 

maintains interline ticket and baggage agreements with the majority of the other carriers 

serving Denver; which allows for the maximum utilization of our air service for the 

passengers flying to and from Chadron and Alliance, Nebraska. 

All proposals contemplate the use of 19 seat Beech 1900D Airliner equipment. 

Questions and comments may be referred to: 

Michael O. Matthews 

Chief Financial Officer 

Great Lakes Aviation, Ltd. 

1022 Airport Parkway 

Cheyenne, WY 82001 

(307) 432-7000 
Great Lakes Aviation, Ltd. 

Annual Compensation Requirements for Essential Air Service at 

Chadron and Alliance 

(at 98 percent completion) 

Departures: 

Block Hours: 

Revenue Passenger Miles: 

Available Seat Miles: 

2,198 

1,588 

1,424,000 

5.428,791 

Operating Revenues: 

Passenger: AIA-DEN 

CDR-DEN 

3,000 psgrsat $101.59 $304,770 

4,000 psgrsat $107.72 $430,880 

Other: (at 0.62% of passenger revenue) 

Total Operating Revenues: 

S4.561 

$740,211 

Operating Expenses: 

Direct: Aircraft and Hull Insurance 

Fuel and Oil 

Flying Operations 

Maintenance 

Total Direct Expenses: 

Total Indirect Expenses: 

Total Operating Expenses: 

Operating Loss 

Profit Element (5.0% of Total Operating Expenses) 

Annual Compensation Requirement: 

Representative Schedule 

Flt# 

5012 

5041 

5114 

5114 

5027 

Freq 

X7 

X67 

6 

7 

X6 

Flow/ 

CDR-AIA 

AIA-DEN 

DEN-AIA 

AIA-CDR 

CDR-DEN 

DEN-AIA 

AIA-CDR 

CDR-AIA 

AIA-DEN 

DEN-AIA 

AIA-CDR 

$338,710 

$1,082,239 

$270,182 

$528,898 

Schedule 

0619-0644 

0654-0750 

1155-1250 

1300-1326 

1336-1443 

1237-1332 

1342-1408 

1259-1324 

1334-1430 

1845-1940 

1950-2016 

Time 

25 

56 

55 

26 

67 

55 

26 

25 

56 

55 

26 

Equi 

BE1 

BE1 

BE1 

BE1 

BE1 

BE1 

BE1 

BE1 

BE1 

BE1 

BE1 

$2,220,029 

$596.744 

$2,816,773 

($2,076,562) 

$140,839 

$2,217,401 

Bid assumes no restrictions upline and authority for one stop schedules for Alliance and Chadron 

to our Denver Hub.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY HIGH

 681

 680

 671

 664

 714

 767

 778

 716

 794

 791

 721

 767

 778

 787

 797

 733

 702

 792

 811

 847

 882

 873

 919

 960

 970

 907

 923

 885

 901

 978

 988

 399

 407

 414

 418

 418

 420

 440

 434

 437

 440

 443

 437

 441

 428

 416

 420

 440

 452

 460

 454

 467

 410

 379

 399

 376

 382

 384

 376

 378

 387

 362

 481

 504

 517

 510

 523

 543

 559

 477

 587

 573

 560

 579

 572

 552

 516

 572

 556

 580

 566

 594

 611

 594

 585

 715

 554

 554

 564

 518

 511

 547

 543

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

MARCH 2013 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: May 3, 2013

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

DELTA MENDOTA CANAL AT CHECK 13 (O'NEILL)
§ 10.805 What services are covered by the OWCP fee schedule? ( a ) Payment for medical and other health services, devices and supplies furnished by physicians, hospitals, and other providers for work-related injuries shall not exceed a maximum allowable charge for such service as determined by the Director, except as provided in this section.
( b ) The schedule of maximum allowable charges does not apply to charges for services provided in nursing home for employees admitted to that nursing home prior to August 29, 2011, but does apply to all charges for services provided by a nursing home where the employee was admitted to that nursing home after that date. The schedule does apply to charges for treatment furnished in a nursing home by a physician or other medical professional at any time.
( c ) The schedule of maximum allowable charges also does not apply to charges for appliances, supplies, services or treatment furnished by medical facilities of the U.S. Public Health Service or the Departments of the Army, Navy, Air Force and Veterans Affairs.
482 P.2d 239

#### Clemente MARTINEZ, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. BOARD OF EDUCATION OF the VAUGHN MUNICIPAL SCHOOLS, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 9134.

Supreme Court of New Mexico.

March 15, 1971.

James A. Maloney, Atty. Gen., E. P. Ripley, Sp. Asst. Atty. Gen.¿ Santa Fe, for defendant-appellant.

Donald A. Martinez, Las Vegas, for plaintiff-appellee.

OPINION

McMANUS, Justice.

Defendant Vaughn Municipal School Board appeals from judgment for plaintiff Clemente Martinez in an action for breach of a school bus operator’s contract. At issue is the effect of § 77-14-5, N.M.S.A. (1953 Comp.) on the transportation contract between the parties. '

Defendant alleges that § 77-14-5(C) became a part of the contract between the parties and gave them the right to terminate the contract when the number of pupils on the route fell below ten. The section states:

> “The state board shall hold a hearing on the written protest and may modify or change any school bus route if it determines the modification or change will be beneficial to the school district affected. *However, no school bus route serving less than ten [101 students shall be established or maintained.”*(Emphasis ours.)

Plaintiff agrees that the statute became a part of the contract although not expressly set out therein. Compare Wiggs v. City of Albuquerque, 56 N.M. 214, 242 P.2d 865 (1952). However, he argues that § 77-14 — 5, supra, was applicable only at the time of the making of the contract and the establishment of the bus route.

The language of § 77-14 — 5, supra, is clear and unambiguous. It pertains not only to the establishment, but also the maintenance of school bus routes by the state transportation division of the department of education, with provision for protest by local school boards through § 77-14 — 5(A), which states:

> “A local school board may file a written protest with the state board objecting to a school bus route established by the state transportation division. The written protest shall contain the objections of the local school board to the school bus route.”

*376There is also provision for modification or change of established school bus routes. Section 77-14-5 (D) provides:

> “No school bus route shall be modified or changed in any manner inconsistent with the provisions of an existing school bus service contract unless the proposed modification or change is consented to by the state transportation director.”

However, the defendant did not follow the proper administrative channels. The defendant unilaterally revoked the contract in question without recourse to the requisites of § 77-14-5(D), supra, which, clearly requires that recourse be had through the state transportation director.

The judgment of the lower court is hereby affirmed.

It is so ordered.

TACKETT and STEPHENSON, JJ., concur.
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 12.1

                                PACCAR Financial Corp.

                  COMPUTATION OF RATIO OF EARNINGS TO FIXED CHARGES
                        PURSUANT TO SEC REPORTING REQUIREMENTS
                                (Thousands of Dollars)



                                                Nine Months Ended
                                                  September 30
                                            1997                1996
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

FIXED CHARGES
  Interest expense                        $   75,238          $   73,786
  Portion of rentals deemed interest             187                 183
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

TOTAL FIXED CHARGES                       $   75,425          $   73,969
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

EARNINGS
  Income before taxes                     $   38,451          $   39,256
  Fixed charges                               75,425              73,969
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

EARNINGS AS DEFINED                       $  113,876          $  113,225
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------


RATIO OF EARNINGS TO FIXED CHARGES             1.51X               1.53X
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------



The method of computing the ratio of earnings to fixed charges shown above
complies with SEC reporting requirements but differs from the method called for
in the Support Agreement between the Company and PACCAR Inc.  See Exhibit 12.2.




                                      10
|  |  | [if !vml]>[endif]>

You have  reached the Federal Depository Library Program Electronic Collection  (FDLP/EC) Archive. This archive assures ongoing access to publications in the  FDLP/EC. Access to publications in the archive is available through GPO's  suite of cataloging and locator services, including the Catalog of U.S.  Government Publications (CGP).
Title:    Xylem monoterpenes of pines [electronic resource] : distribution,    variation, genetics, function 
 
SuDocs Number:A 13.88:PSW-GTR-177
Item    Number:0083-B-06    (online)
GPO    System Number: 000867231
 
 
 
Part 1
 
Part 2 
 
Part 3
 
Part 4
 
 
 
A service of the Superintendent of Documents,  U.S. Government Printing Office..

 

Last updated: May 11, 2020  Page Name:  http://permanent.access.gpo.gov/
perm |
|--|--|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|