alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
### §7231c. Eligibility

A local educational agency, or consortium of such agencies where appropriate, is eligible to receive a grant under this part to carry out the purpose of this part if such agency or consortium—

(1) is implementing a plan undertaken pursuant to a final order issued by a court of the United States, or a court of any State, or any other State agency or official of competent jurisdiction, that requires the desegregation of minority-group-segregated children or faculty in the elementary schools and secondary schools of such agency; or

(2) without having been required to do so, has adopted and is implementing, or will, if a grant is awarded to such local educational agency, or consortium of such agencies, under this part, adopt and implement a plan that has been approved by the Secretary as adequate under title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 [42 U.S.C. 2000d et seq.] for the desegregation of minority-group-segregated children or faculty in such schools.

(Pub. L. 89–10, title IV, §4404, formerly title V, §5304, as added Pub. L. 107–110, title V, §501, Jan. 8, 2002, 115 Stat. 1807; renumbered title IV, §4404, Pub. L. 114–95, title IV, §4001(b)(3)(A), (B), (D)(i), Dec. 10, 2015, 129 Stat. 1967.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

The Civil Rights Act of 1964, referred to in par. (2), is Pub. L. 88–352, July 2, 1964, 78 Stat. 241. Title VI of the Act is classified generally to subchapter V (§2000d et seq.) of chapter 21 of Title 42, The Public Health and Welfare. For complete classification of this Act to the Code, see Short Title note set out under section 2000a of Title 42 and Tables.

#### Prior Provisions

A prior section 4404 of Pub. L. 89–10 was classified to section 3124 of this title, prior to the general amendment of Pub. L. 89–10 by Pub. L. 103–382.
```

[Congressional Bills 114th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 3735 Engrossed in House (EH)]

<DOC>
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
114th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 3735

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
 at 200 Town Run Lane in Winston Salem, North Carolina, as the ``Maya 
                    Angelou Memorial Post Office''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. MAYA ANGELOU MEMORIAL POST OFFICE.

    (a) Designation.--The facility of the United States Postal Service 
located at 200 Town Run Lane in Winston Salem, North Carolina, shall be 
known and designated as the ``Maya Angelou Memorial Post Office''.
    (b) References.--Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, 
paper, or other record of the United States to the facility referred to 
in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``Maya 
Angelou Memorial Post Office''.

            Passed the House of Representatives March 1, 2016.

            Attest:

                                                                 Clerk.
114th CONGRESS

  2d Session

                               H. R. 3735

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
 at 200 Town Run Lane in Winston Salem, North Carolina, as the ``Maya 
                    Angelou Memorial Post Office''.
```
```

[Congressional Bills 116th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 540 Reported in Senate (RS)]

<DOC>

                                                        Calendar No. 87
116th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 540

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             April 3, 2019

Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Homeland Security 
                        and Governmental Affairs

                              May 15, 2019

               Reported by Mr. Johnson, without amendment

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
  at 770 Ayrault Road in Fairport, New York, as the ``Louise and Bob 
                        Slaughter Post Office''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. LOUISE AND BOB SLAUGHTER POST OFFICE.

    (a) Designation.--The facility of the United States Postal Service 
located at 770 Ayrault Road in Fairport, New York, shall be known and 
designated as the ``Louise and Bob Slaughter Post Office''.
    (b) References.--Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, 
paper, or other record of the United States to the facility referred to 
in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``Louise and 
Bob Slaughter Post Office''.
                                                        Calendar No. 87

116th CONGRESS

  1st Session

                               H. R. 540

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
  at 770 Ayrault Road in Fairport, New York, as the ``Louise and Bob 
                        Slaughter Post Office''.

_______________________________________________________________________

                              May 15, 2019

                       Reported without amendment
```
###### Editorial Note on Part 70

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 70 appear by T.D. ATF-450, 66 FR 29022-29030, May 29, 2001.

#### § 70.436 Offers in compromise.

Procedure in the case of offers in compromise of liabilities under 26 U.S.C. chapter 52 is set forth in §§ 70.482 through 70.484.

[T.D. ATF-301, 55 FR 47654, Nov. 14, 1990]
A-AA+Skip to content

                  - Home
                  - Compendium Statistics
                  - Event
                  - Archives
                  - Glossary
                  - Help
                  - Contact
                  - Research on Disability

Annual Disability Statistics Compendium

              - Home /
              - Archives /
              - 2012 Compendium Statistics /
              - 2012 Employment /
              - 2012 2.1 Civilians with Disabilities Ages 18-64 Years Living in the Community for the U.S.

## Table 2.1: Employment—Civilians with Disabilities Ages 18 to 64 Years Living in the Community for the United States and States: 2011

----

----

 

----

#### 2012 Disability Compendium

                        - Home
                        - Compendium Statistics                           - Population and Prevelance
                          - Employment
                          - Time Trend Population Statistics
                          - Poverty
                          - Earnings
                          - Veterans
                          - Health Insurance Coverage
                          - Health
                          - Social Security Administration Programs
                          - Medicaid and Medicare
                          - Special Education
                          - Vocational Rehabilitation
                          - Federal Government Spending and Employment
                          - International Disability Statistics
                          - Population Statistics: Disability Type
                        - Event
                        - Archives                           - 2012 Compendium Statistics
                        - Glossary
                        - Help
                        - Contact
                        - Research on Disability

#### Funding for this project is made possible by:

 The Research and Training Center on Disability Statistics and Demographics (StatsRRTC), which is funded by the U.S. Department of Education, National Institute for Disability and Rehabilitation Research, under cooperative agreements H133B080012.

#### Stay Connected

**Institute on Disability**10 West Edge Drive, Suite 101Durham, NH 03824603.862.4320 | relay: 711 | [email protected]www.iod.unh.edu

© 2013. Institute on Disability.University of New Hampshire.
#### James E. Mathewson, Appellant, v. New York Central and Hudson River Railroad Company, Respondent.

Motion for leave to appeal to Court of Appeals denied, with ten dollars costs.
[if !vml]>[endif]>

[if !vml]>[endif]>

You have reached the FederalDepository Library Program Electronic Collection (FDLP/EC) Archive. Thisarchive assures ongoing access to publications in the FDLP/EC. Access topublications in the archive is available through GPO's suite of cataloging andlocator services, including the Catalog of U.S. Government Publications(CGP).  Archived copies of publications are retrieved in the event thatpublications are no longer available from the original publishing agency site. 
**Title:****Performance accountabilityreport : management discussion and analysis, annual program performance report,management assurances, audited financial statements**
 
SuDoc Number:Y 3.ET 3:1-2/

Item Number:1089-T-05 (online)
CGP systemNumber:000937537
 
2007 | 2008 | 2009
2010 | 2011 | 2012 | 2013
 
March 3, 2020
<PAGE>   1
                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.1


                       CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS




We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements of
Arbor Drugs, Inc. on Form S-8 (File Nos. 33-11830, 33-54141, 33-56109,
33-39259, 33-13102 and 333-13433) of our report dated September 27, 1996, on 
our audits of the consolidated financial statements and financial statement 
schedule of Arbor Drugs, Inc. and Subsidiaries as of July 31, 1996 and 1995, 
and for the years ended July 31, 1996, 1995 and 1994, which report is included 
in this Annual Report on Form 10-K.







/s/ Coopers & Lybrand L.L.P.
------------------------------
Detroit, Michigan
October 17, 1996
#### The First National Bank of Binghamton, Respondent, *v.*Ervin D. Baker and Others, Defendants, Impleaded with E. I. DuPont de Nemours Powder Company, Appellant.

Third Department,

July 1, 1914.

Bills and notes — mortgage as security for indorsement not enforcible until indorser is charged with liability — presentation of note for payment.

Where the maker of a note executes a mortgage to an indorser to secure him on account of said indorsement, and he has never been charged with liability thereon, the mortgage is not enforcible by the indorser or by an assignee.

The fact that the indorser was secured by the mortgage did not dispense with the necessity of presenting the note for payment and notice of nonpayment.

Appeal by the defendant, E. I. DuPont de Nemours Powder Company, from an interlocutory judgment of the Supreme Court in favor of the plaintiff, entered in the office of the clerk of the county of Broome on the 14th day of February, 1914, overruling its demurrer to the complaint.

*T. B. & L. M. Merchant,*for the appellant.

*Stewart & Kelley [Charles R. Stewart*and *Raymond H. Moody*of counsel], for the respondent.

Kellogg, J.:

The action was brought to foreclose a mortgage executed by the defendants Baker to one Bayless. Bayless, for the accommodation of the Bakers, November 27,1912, indorsed their note payable to the plaintiff bank for $2,000, two months after date, and the mortgage was given by them to secure him on account of said indorsement. They owed no indebtedness to him and none could arise from them to him unless he paid the note or was charged with liability thereon. The obligation of an indorser is that if the note is duly presented for payment and notice of non-payment duly given to him, he will pay the same. It does not appear that the indorser was ever charged with liability. The fact that Bayless was secured for his *73indorsement did not dispense with the necessity of presenting the note for payment and notice of non-payment. *(Seacord*v. *Miller,*13 N. Y. 55.)

The particular terms of the. bond and mortgage are not material, as it is conceded that their only force or effect was to secure the indorser on account of his having assumed that position upon the note. The note was renewed from time to time, the last renewal being due July 27,1913. The mortgage was assigned to the bank, but at what time, whether before or after the last renewal note became due, does not .appear.

It is manifest if Bayless had continued to own the mortgage, and the note became due, and he was not charged with liability thereon, that he could not have maintained an action to foreclose the mortgage.

The interlocutory judgment should be reversed, with costs to the appellant in both courts, with the usual leave to the plaintiff, upon the' payment of such costs, to amend its complaint.

All concurred; Lyon, J., not sitting.

Interlocutory judgment reversed, with costs to appellant in both courts, with the usual leave to the plaintiff, upon payment of such costs, to amend the complaint.
#### § 31.153 Records to be kept by States, political subdivisions of States, or the District of Columbia.

The provisions of this subpart regarding the maintenance of records and the submission of reports shall not apply to States, political subdivisions of States, or the District of Columbia, or to any liquor stores operated by such entities that maintain, and make available for inspection by appropriate TTB officers, records that will enable TTB to verify receipts of wines and beer and to trace readily all distilled spirits received and disposed of by those entities. However, States, political subdivisions of States, and the District of Columbia, and liquor stores operated by such entities, must, on request of the appropriate TTB officer, furnish such transcripts, summaries, and copies of records with respect to distilled spirits as that TTB officer may require.

(26 U.S.C. 5121)
```

                                                                     Exhibit 8.1

      The following is a list of all of Koor Industries Ltd.'s significant
subsidiaries, affiliates and other companies in which we have invested as of
December 31, 2006, including the name, country of incorporation or residence,
proportion of ownership interest and, if different, proportion of voting power
held.

                                                    Percentage
                                     Country of         of       Percentage of
                                    Incorporation    Ownership      Voting
  Name of Subsidiary/Affiliate      or Residence     Interest      Rights(1)
---------------------------------   ------------    ----------    ---------
Koor Corporate Venture Capital         Israel          100%          100%
Makhteshim Agan Industries Ltd.        Israel         37.1%         39.6%
ECI Telecom Ltd. (2)                   Israel         27.7%         28.1%
Telrad Networks Ltd.                   Israel         61.0%         61.0%
ECtel Ltd. (3)                         Israel         18.8%         21.4%
Sheraton Moriah (Israel) Ltd. (4)      Israel         56.5%         56.5%
Knafaim Holdings Ltd. (5)              Israel          9.2%          9.2%
Epsilon Investment House Ltd.          Israel           50%           50%
Dekolink Wireless Ltd.                 Israel           70%           70%
Scopus Video Networks Ltd. (6)         Israel         22.2%         22.2%
A.K.A. Development Ltd.                Israel         33.3%         33.3%
Microwave Networks Inc.             United States     97.5%         97.5%

----------------------

(1) Represents the ownership percentage used by Koor Industries Ltd. ("Koor")
    for accounting purposes, which is based on voting rights.

(2) An entity controlled by Koor's controlling shareholder holds approximately
    13% of ECI Telecom.

(3) An entity controlled by Koor's controlling shareholder holds approximately
    9% of ECtel.

(4) On December 17, 2006, Koor signed an agreement for the sale of its entire
    holding in Sheraton-Moriah (Israel) Ltd. The transaction was completed on
    April 26, 2007, after receiving all requisite approvals.

(5) On May 8, 2007, Koor signed an agreement to sell 4.96% of Knafaim for
    consideration of approximately $7.4 million, and on June 5, 2007, the
    purchaser notified Koor that it is exercising an option granted to it to
    purchase the balance of Koor's shareholding in Knafaim, representing
    approximately 4.2% of Knafaim for total additional consideration of
    approximately $6.3 million.

(6) On January 11, 2007, Koor sold its entire holdings in Scopus Video Networks
    for consideration of approximately $16 million.
```
#### Mary Douglass v. City of New York.

Present — Martin, P. J., Townley, Glennon, Dore and Cohn, JJ.; Glennon, J., taking no part.
EX-4.5



 Exhibit 4.5 

AMENDMENT NO. 4 
 TO THE

 BOB EVANS FARMS, INC. AND AFFILIATES 

401K RETIREMENT PLAN 

(amended and restated effective January 1, 2011) 

WHEREAS, Bob Evans Farms, Inc. (the “Sponsor”) has adopted the Bob Evans Farms, Inc. and Affiliates 401K Retirement Plan (the
“Plan”); and 
 WHEREAS, the Plan provides that the Sponsor may amend the Plan from time to time; and 

WHEREAS, the Sponsor desires to amend the Plan for certain administrative reasons; 

NOW, THEREFORE, the Plan is amended as follows: 

The definition of “Employer” set forth in Section 21 shall be deleted in its entirety and the following shall be substituted:

 “Employer” means the Sponsor and any Related Employer or Affiliate that, with the permission of the Sponsor, elects to
join the Plan. The following companies are Affiliates that elect to participate in the Plan: BEF Foods, Inc., effective on and after December 28, 2012, Bob Evans Farms, LLC (formerly known as Bob Evans Farms, Inc.), an Ohio Corporation,
effective on and after December 31, 2012, SWH Mimi’s Café, LLC (formerly known as SWH Corporation), and BEF Management, Inc. 

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Sponsor, by a duly authorized officer, has caused this Amendment No. 4 to be executed effective as of the dates
set forth in the amendment above. 
  

									
							BOB EVANS FARMS, INC.
					
	Date:		  
				By:		  

					
							Title:
Electrical Conductivity, UMHOS

Day High Low Mean

1 249 167 192

2 0 0 0

3 301 168 216

4 0 0 0

5 337 171 227

6 339 171 227

7 312 169 216

8 302 168 213

9 288 177 216

10 318 178 209

11 316 181 219

12 318 181 209

13 311 183 213

14 300 186 213

15 282 178 198

16 258 182 199

17 243 193 206

18 234 190 204

19 211 180 198

20 217 188 202

21 221 178 199

22 216 187 204

23 239 208 222

24 250 218 237

25 235 210 224

26 239 204 222

27 228 200 217

28 249 204 220

29 253 204 218

30 248 212 229

31 274 219 243

COMMENT(S):

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

Historical Archive and Report Database

Delta Mendota Canal At Check 13 O'Neill

Period: August 2023 Run Date: 10/11/2023
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY ELEV

 969.88

 969.17

 968.54

 967.83

 967.19

 966.48

 965.89

 965.20

 964.42

 963.70

 963.13

 962.44

 961.60

 960.85

 959.90

 959.19

 958.43

 957.71

 957.00

 956.25

 955.61

 954.94

 954.17

 953.33

 952.63

 951.78

 950.25

 949.56

 948.74

 948.04

 947.36

 1,210.5

 1,204.7

 1,199.6

 1,193.9

 1,188.7

 1,183.0

 1,178.3

 1,172.8

 1,166.6

 1,160.9

 1,156.4

 1,150.9

 1,144.3

 1,138.4

 1,131.0

 1,125.5

 1,119.6

 1,114.0

 1,108.6

 1,102.8

 1,097.9

 1,092.8

 1,086.9

 1,080.6

 1,075.3

 1,068.9

 1,057.4

 1,052.3

 1,046.2

 1,041.0

 1,036.0

STORAGE

-5.5

-5.8

-5.1

-5.7

-5.2

-5.7

-4.7

-5.5

-6.2

-5.7

-4.5

-5.4

-6.6

-5.9

-7.4

-5.5

-5.9

-5.6

-5.5

-5.8

-4.9

-5.1

-5.9

-6.4

-5.3

-6.4

-11.5

-5.1

-6.1

-5.2

-5.0

CHANGE

420

297

366

303

251

363

457

465

560

392

329

332

256

252

221

308

426

309

254

346

210

55

202

356

322

346

-2,668

375

463

402

282

INFLOW

 3,051

 3,103

 2,811

 3,092

 2,723

 3,124

 2,726

 3,131

 3,563

 3,139

 2,462

 2,927

 3,456

 3,100

 3,855

 2,976

 3,287

 2,995

 2,902

 3,154

 2,554

 2,493

 3,005

 3,445

 2,875

 3,450

 3,002

 2,860

 3,465

 2,912

 2,699

POWER

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

SPILL

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

OUTLET

 121

 100

 126

 102

 125

 112

 114

 111

 126

 133

 141

 148

 130

 116

 106

 116

 110

 120

 112

 94

 126

 143

 150

 122

 115

 124

 109

 108

 70

 105

 112

C.F.S.

 .46

 .38

 .48

 .39

 .48

 .43

 .44

 .43

 .49

 .52

 .55

 .58

 .51

 .46

 .42

 .46

 .44

 .48

 .45

 .38

 .51

 .58

 .61

 .50

 .47

 .51

 .45

 .45

 .29

 .44

 .47

INCHES

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .02

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

PRECIP

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

JULY 2021 NEW MELONES LAKE DAILY OPERATIONS RUN DATE: August 3, 2021

IN LAKE

EVAPORATION

INCHES

C.F.S.

COMPUTED*

1000 ACRE-FEET

RELEASE - C.F.S.

TOTALS -180.1 7,252 94,337 0 0 3,647 14.51 .02

ACRE-FEET -180,100 14,384 187,117 0 0 7,234

COMMENTS:

* COMPUTED INFLOW IS THE SUM OF CHANGE IN STORAGE, RELEASES AND EVAPORATION.

SUMMARY

RELEASE (ACRE-FEET)

POWER 187,117

SPILL 0

OUTLET

TOTAL

 0

 187,117

PRECIPITATION

THIS MONTH =

TO DATE =

 .02

JULY 1, 2021 .02

 1,215.9

Table 13 

OCT 1, 2020 TO DATE = 16.80