alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

DAY

 12,092

 12,026

 11,882

 11,747

 11,531

 11,258

 11,109

 11,107

 11,661

 11,938

 12,007

 12,010

 11,933

 11,901

 11,943

 11,967

 11,930

 11,880

 11,818

 11,773

 11,720

 11,720

 11,736

 11,704

 11,693

 11,749

 11,877

 11,962

 20,800

 20,710

 20,727

 20,710

 20,779

 20,916

 20,955

 21,058

 21,560

 21,893

 21,986

 22,017

 22,095

 22,138

 22,099

 22,134

 22,208

 22,252

 22,248

 22,239

 22,239

 22,182

 22,156

 22,186

 22,208

 22,222

 22,357

 22,673

STORAGE - A.F. 

 32,892

 32,736

 32,609

 32,457

 32,310

 32,174

 32,064

 32,165

 33,221

 33,831

 33,993

 34,027

 34,028

 34,039

 34,042

 34,101

 34,138

 34,132

 34,066

 34,012

 33,959

 33,902

 33,892

 33,890

 33,901

 33,971

 34,234

 34,635

159

349

256

239

144

451

648

994

2,296

1,642

584

524

495

318

379

436

374

330

424

361

320

357

416

421

497

586

789

1,032

86

270

192

162

70

382

593

1,045

2,828

1,950

666

541

496

324

381

466

393

327

391

334

293

328

411

420

503

621

922

1,234

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

FEBRUARY 2014 FULL NATURAL FLOW AT NEW MELONES DAM RUN DATE: 04/25/2014

TOTALS +1,599 16,629

* October 1, 32,984

 65.3

 65.9

 66.3

 66.6

 66.7

 67.5

 68.7

 70.7

 76.3

 80.2

 81.5

 82.6

 83.6

 84.2

 85.0

 85.9

 86.7

 87.3

 88.1

 88.8

 89.4

 90.0

 90.8

 91.7

 92.6

 93.9

 95.7

 98.2

DONNELLS

RES

BEARDSLEY

RES

2013 TO DATE

NEW

MELONES

INFLOW

C.F.S

NATURAL

RIVER

C.F.S

ACCUM *

FULL

NATURAL

1000 A.F.

RESERVOIR

TOTAL

-144

-156

-127

-152

-147

-136

-110

+101

+1,056

+610

+162

+34

+1

+11

+3

+59

+37

-6

-66

-54

-53

-57

-10

-2

+11

+70

+263

+401

CHANGE

A.F. C.F.S.

-73

-79

-64

-77

-74

-69

-55

+51

+532

+308

+82

+17

+1

+6

+2

+30

+19

-3

-33

-27

-27

-29

-5

-1

+6

+35

+133

+202
§ 9.292 Comptche. ( a ) *Name.* The name of the viticultural area described in this section is “Comptche”. For purposes of part 4 of this chapter, “Comptche” is a term of viticultural significance.
( b ) *Approved maps.* The one United States Geological Survey (USGS) 1:24,000 scale topographic map used to determine the boundary of the viticultural area is titled Comptche, California (provisional edition 1991).
( c ) *Boundary.* The Comptche viticultural area is located in Mendocino County, California. The boundary of the Comptche viticultural area is as described as follows: ( 1 ) The beginning point is on the Comptche map at the intersection of a north-south tributary of the Albion River and an unnamed improved road known locally as Comptche Ukiah Road, section 12, T16N/R16W. From the beginning point, proceed northwest in a straight line, crossing an unnamed, unimproved road known locally as Surprise Valley Road, to the 400-foot elevation contour, section 12, T16N/R16W; then
( 2 ) Proceed north, then easterly along the 400-foot elevation contour to its intersection with an unnamed, unimproved road southeast of the marked 517-foot peak in section 1, T16N/R16W; then
( 3 ) Proceed southeasterly along the unnamed, unimproved road to its intersection with an unnamed, unimproved road known locally as Surprise Valley Road, section 1, T16N/R16W; then
( 4 ) Proceed northeasterly along Surprise Valley Road to its intersection with an unnamed, unimproved road known locally as North Fork Road, section 1, T16N/R16 W; then
( 5 ) Proceed northwesterly along North Fork Road to its intersection with an unnamed, unimproved road known locally as Docker Hill Road in section 36, T17N/R16W; then
( 6 ) Proceed north along Docker Hill Road to its intersection with the 400-foot elevation contour, section 36, T17N/R16W; then
( 7 ) Proceed easterly along the 400-foot elevation contour to its intersection with the North Fork of the Albion River in section 37, T17N/R15W; then
( 8 ) Continue in a generally southerly direction along the 400-foot elevation contour to its intersection with an unnamed intermittent creek in section 6, T16N/R15W; then
( 9 ) Proceed south in a straight line to the 400-foot elevation contour, section 6, T16N/R15W; then
( 10 ) Proceed southeasterly, then north, then southeasterly along the meandering 400-foot elevation contour to its intersection with the Albion River in section 8, T16N/R15W; then
( 11 ) Proceed westerly along the Albion River to its intersection with a north-south tributary in section 12, T16N/R16W; then
( 12 ) Proceed northeasterly along the tributary, returning to the beginning point.
( d ) *Exclusion.* The Comptche viticultural area as described in this section is not included within the North Coast viticultural area as described in § 9.30.
[TTB-2023-0003; T.D. TTB-192, 89 FR 24380, Apr. 8, 2024]
###### Editorial Note on Part 71

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 71 appear by T.D. ATF-414, 64 FR 49084, Sept. 10, 1999and T.D. ATF-463, 66 FR 42734, 42735, Aug. 15, 2001.

#### § 71.106 Certification and transmittal of record and decision.

After reaching his decision, the administrative law judge shall certify to the complete record of the proceeding before him and (a) in proceedings on an application, shall immediately forward the complete certified record together with four copies of his recommended decision to the appropriate TTB officer for initial decision, or (b) in revocation, suspension or annulment proceedings, shall immediately forward the complete certified record, together with two copies of his decision, to the appropriate TTB officer, serve one copy of his decision on the respondent or his counsel and transmit a copy of his decision to the attorney for the Government.

[21 FR 1441, Mar. 6, 1956. Redesignated at 40 FR 16835, Apr. 15, 1975, and amended by T.D. ATF-199, 50 FR 9197, Mar. 6, 1985; T.D. ATF-374, 61 FR 29957, June 13, 1996]
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OF CONSOLIDATED RESOURCES HEALTH FOR THE NINE MONTHS ENDED
SEPTEMBER 30, 1999 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1999
<CASH>                                       1,232,547
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  286,903
<ALLOWANCES>                                    42,996
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             1,533,478
<PP&E>                                       8,031,565
<DEPRECIATION>                              (4,904,113)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               5,085,038
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        1,324,149
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                    (222,227)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 5,085,038
<SALES>                                      5,086,141
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             5,103,942
<CGS>                                        4,905,960
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                5,243,885
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             230,892
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (139,943)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (139,943)
<EPS-BASIC>                                      (8.96)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (8.96)


</TABLE>
### §7947. Allocation of responsibility for noneconomic loss

#### (a) General rule

In any civil action against a teacher, based on an act or omission of a teacher acting within the scope of the teacher's employment or responsibilities to a school or governmental entity, the liability of the teacher for noneconomic loss shall be determined in accordance with subsection (b).

#### (b) Amount of liability

#### (1) In general

#### (A) Liability

Each defendant who is a teacher shall be liable only for the amount of noneconomic loss allocated to that defendant in direct proportion to the percentage of responsibility of that defendant (determined in accordance with paragraph (2)) for the harm to the claimant with respect to which that defendant is liable.

#### (B) Separate judgment

The court shall render a separate judgment against each defendant in an amount determined pursuant to subparagraph (A).

#### (2) Percentage of responsibility

For purposes of determining the amount of noneconomic loss allocated to a defendant who is a teacher under this section, the trier of fact shall determine the percentage of responsibility of each person responsible for the claimant's harm, whether or not such person is a party to the action.

#### (c) Rule of construction

Nothing in this section shall be construed to preempt or supersede any Federal or State law that further limits the application of joint liability in a civil action described in subsection (a), beyond the limitations established in this section.

(Pub. L. 89–10, title VIII, §8557, formerly title II, §2367, as added Pub. L. 107–110, title II, §201, Jan. 8, 2002, 115 Stat. 1670; renumbered title IX, §9547, renumbered title VIII, §8557, Pub. L. 114–95, title II, §2001(a)(3)(A), (B), (D), title VIII, §8001(a)(7), Dec. 10, 2015, 129 Stat. 1913, 2088, 2089.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section was classified to section 6737 of this title prior to renumbering by Pub. L. 114–95.
#### § 771.38 Licensee's or permittee's failure to meet requirements within reasonable time.

If the licensee or permittee fails to meet the requirements of applicable laws and regulations in this part within such reasonable time as may be specified by the Director of Industry Operations, proceedings for revocation or denial of renewal of the license or permit shall be initiated.
### subpart 2—accountability and administration
Exhibit 32.1

** **

** **

** **

                               Certification of CEO and CFO

**                            Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,**

**                                  As Adopted Pursuant to**

**                       Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**

 

 

 

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of National Housing Partnership Realty Fund I (the "Partnership"), for the quarterly period ended June 30, 2011 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), Steven D. Cordes, as the equivalent of the chief executive officer of the Partnership, and Stephen B. Waters, as the equivalent of the chief financial officer of the Partnership, each hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of his knowledge:

 

(1)   The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2)   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Partnership.

 

 
|   |       /s/Steven D. Cordes  |
|--------|-----------------------------------------------------|
|   | Name: Steven D. Cordes                              |
|   | Date: August 12, 2011                               |
|   |                                                |
|   |       /s/Stephen B. Waters |
|   | Name: Stephen B. Waters                             |
|   | Date: August 12, 2011                               |

 

 

This certification is furnished with this Report pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not be deemed filed by the Partnership for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.

** **
1 TheHonorable Henry Woods, United States District Judge for the Eastern

District of Arkansas. 

## United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________ No. 00-1743

___________ United States of America, * * Appellee, * * v. * Appeal from the United States * District Court for the Bob D. J. Kranick, * Eastern District of Arkansas. * Appellant. * [UNPUBLISHED]

___________ Submitted: January 23, 2001 Filed: February 1, 2001

___________ Before HANSEN, MORRIS SHEPPARD ARNOLD, and BYE, Circuit Judges.

___________ PER CURIAM. Bob Kranick pleaded guilty to kidnaping, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1201(a)(1), andthe district court 1 sentenced him to 110 months imprisonment and 5 years supervised release. Kranick appeals his sentence. Having carefully reviewed the record and the parties’ briefs, we affirm the judgment of the district court. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.-2-

A true copy. Attest: CLERK, U.S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.
(No. 7100

#### Morrison-Rooney Associates, Ltd., Claimant, *vs.*State of Illinois, Department of Finance, Respondent.

*Opinion filed June 7, 1973.*

Morrison-Rooney Associates, Ltd., Claimant, pro se.

William J. Scott, Attorney General; Saul R. Wexler, Assistant Attorney General, for Respondent.

Per Curiam.
p. 1 

# OAR Box 

# 1828 Prepped by Ollie Stewart



### Document

Number: 

# 211 ) M-K-(I)-2 4 Docket Number: 

# A-83-2 7

Printed 11/12/2008 11:12:55 AM Sheet 211 of 325P. 2 

# _\_g j
II-K-(I)-2 4 DISCUSSIO NPAPE R O NTH E SELECTIO NO F ENERG Y SCENARIO S T O EVALUAT E TH E INDUSTRIA L BOILE R NSPS . EEA , Inc . Marc h 28 , 1979 . THI S INFORMATIO NCA

NB E FOUN D I NDOCKE T A-79-02 , ITE M II-K-(I)-2 4
Opinion filed September 26 , 202 4



### In The 

# Eleventh Court of Appeals

___ _

__ _

____ 

### No. 11

- 2 4

- 00 2 19

- CR

____ __ _____ 

### KATHRYN DENISE MCDUFF , Appellant
V.
THE STATE OF TEXAS , Appellee

On Appeal from the County Court at Law No. 2 Taylor County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 2

- 917

- 23

M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N Appellant , Kathryn Denise McDuff, was convicted by a jury of speeding , a Class C misdemeanor

. See T EX

. T RANSP

. C ODE A NN

. § § 545.351

– .352 (West 202 2 ). The jury assessed a fine of $25, and the trial court sentenced Appellant accord ingly

. Appellant filed a notice of appeal on August 9, 2024. W e advised Appellant by
letter s dated August 9, August 21, and September 10 that it did not appear that we had jurisdiction over her appeal , and requested that she submit a response showing2 grounds to continue the appeal

. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 26. 2 (a)

. Appellant , through her
counsel , responded to our jurisdictional inquiry by acknowledg ing that “the punishment imposed is less than the jurisdictional minimum

. ” Appellant further
stated that she “cannot conceive . . . any good

- faith argument” challenging the constitutionality of the statutory provisions that punish a conviction for speeding

. Pursuant to Article 4.03 of the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure, our jurisdiction is limited to cases in which the final judgment of the trial court imposes
a fine that exceeds $100 , “ unless the sole issue is the constitutionality of the

statute or ordinance on which the conviction is based. ” T EX

. C ODE C RIM

. P ROC

. A NN

. art. 4.03 (West 2015 ). Appellant concedes that the fine assessed against her
does not exceed $100, and she does not a ssert any constitutional challenges to Sections 545.351 and 545.352 of the Transportation Code. C onsequently, we lack jurisdiction to consider her appeal

. Accordingly, w e dismiss the appeal

.

W. STACY TROTTER
JUSTICE

September 26 , 202 4 Do not publish. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 47.2(b). Panel consists of: Bailey, C. J., Trott er , J., and W illiams , J.
### §3920. Availability of funds

Funds to carry out this subchapter for any fiscal year shall be made available from amounts appropriated pursuant to annual authorizations of appropriations for the National Science Foundation for Science and Engineering Education. For fiscal year 1986, funds to carry out this subchapter shall be available from amounts authorized by section 102(a)(8) of the National Science Foundation Authorization Act for fiscal year 1986.

(Pub. L. 98–377, title I, §110, as added Pub. L. 99–159, title II, §201, Nov. 22, 1985, 99 Stat. 897.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

Section 102(a)(8) of the National Science Foundation Authorization Act for fiscal year 1986, referred to in text, is section 102(a)(8) of Pub. L. 99–159, title I, Nov. 22, 1985, 99 Stat. 887, which is not classified to the Code.
### §5896. Repealed. Pub. L. 104–134, title I, §101(d) [title VII, §703(a)(15)(A)], Apr. 26, 1996, 110 Stat. 1321–211, 1321–254; renumbered title I, Pub. L. 104–140, §1(a), May 2, 1996, 110 Stat. 1327

Section, Pub. L. 103–227, title III, §316, Mar. 31, 1994, 108 Stat. 184, provided that standards or State assessments described in State improvement plan submitted in accordance with section 5886 of this title were not to be required to be certified by Council.
##### 



EXHIBIT 99.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Trio-Tech International (the
Company) on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended September 30, 2002, as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
Report), the undersigned, as Chief Executive Officer and President of the
Company, hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to his
knowledge:



|(1) |  | the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d));
and     
|--- |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|   
|(2) |  | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
the Company.

Dated: November 8, 2002



/s/ S.W. YONG
_______________________
S.W. Yong
Chief Executive Officer and President
#### § 1002.37 Can one employee be employed in one job by more than one employer?

Yes. Under USERRA, an employer includes not only the person or entity that pays an employee's salary or wages, but also includes a person or entity that has control over his or her employment opportunities, including a person or entity to whom an employer has delegated the performance of employment-related responsibilities. For example, if the employee is a security guard hired by a security company and he or she is assigned to a work site, the employee may report both to the security company and to the site owner. In such an instance, both employers share responsibility for compliance with USERRA. If the security company declines to assign the employee to a job because of a uniformed service obligation (for example, National Guard duties), then the security company could be in violation of the reemployment requirements and the anti-discrimination provisions of USERRA. Similarly, if the employer at the work site causes the employee's removal from the job position because of his or her uniformed service obligations, then the work site employer could be in violation of the reemployment requirements and the anti-discrimination provisions of USERRA.
```

[Congressional Bills 116th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 5723 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

116th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 5723

 To make a supplemental appropriation for the Public Health Emergency 
                     Fund, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            January 30, 2020

 Ms. DeLauro introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
 Committee on Appropriations, and in addition to the Committee on the 
 Budget, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in 
   each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the 
                jurisdiction of the committee concerned

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To make a supplemental appropriation for the Public Health Emergency 
                     Fund, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Public Health Emergency Fund Act''.

SEC. 2. SUPPLEMENTAL APPROPRIATION FOR THE PUBLIC HEALTH EMERGENCY 
              FUND.

    (a) Appropriation.--There is appropriated, out of any money in the 
Treasury not otherwise appropriated, for an additional amount for 
carrying out section 319(a) of the Public Health Service Act, 
$5,000,000,000, to be available until expended. Such amount shall be 
deposited into the Fund established under section 319(b) of such Act.
    (b) Emergency Designation.--The amount made available by subsection 
(a)--
            (1) is designated by Congress as an emergency requirement 
        pursuant to section 251(b)(2)(A)(i) of the Balanced Budget and 
        Emergency Deficit Control Act of 1985; and
            (2) shall be available only if the President subsequently 
        so designates such amount.
    (c) Deposit in Strategic National Stockpile.--The activities under 
section 319(a) of the Public Health Service Act that are funded under 
this section may include the acquisition of products for deposit into 
the strategic national stockpile maintained under section 319F-2 of 
such Act.

SEC. 3. EXEMPTION OF THE PUBLIC HEALTH EMERGENCY FUND FROM 
              SEQUESTRATION.

    (a) In General.--Section 255(g)(1)(A) of the Balanced Budget and 
Emergency Deficit Control Act of 1985 is amended by inserting ``Public 
Health Emergency Fund (009-91-9913).'' after the item relating to 
``Postal Service Fund (18-4020-0-3-372).''.
    (b) Application.--The amendment made by subsection (a) shall apply 
to any sequestration order issued under such Act on or after the date 
of enactment of this section.
                                 <all>
```