alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

DAY ELEV

 860.30

 860.08

 859.86

 859.52

 859.14

 858.78

 858.64

 858.46

 858.42

 858.25

 858.18

 858.22

 858.24

 858.34

 858.48

 858.61

 858.50

 858.49

 858.58

 858.74

 858.84

 859.13

 859.38

 859.61

 859.66

 859.71

 859.91

 860.00

 860.12

 860.39

 512.7

 511.6

 510.6

 509.0

 507.2

 505.5

 504.8

 504.0

 503.8

 503.0

 502.7

 502.9

 503.0

 503.4

 504.1

 504.7

 504.2

 504.1

 504.5

 505.3

 505.8

 507.1

 508.3

 509.4

 509.6

 509.9

 510.8

 511.2

 511.8

 513.1

STORAGE

-0.7

-1.0

-1.0

-1.6

-1.8

-1.7

-0.7

-0.8

-0.2

-0.8

-0.3

+0.2

+0.1

+0.5

+0.7

+0.6

-0.5

+0.0

+0.4

+0.8

+0.5

+1.4

+1.2

+1.1

+0.2

+0.2

+0.9

+0.4

+0.6

+1.3

CHANGE

408

189

174

256

199

246

197

225

182

208

261

240

345

249

353

331

23

344

354

506

335

744

605

564

549

525

544

622

693

691

INFLOW

 732

 701

 685

 1,049

 1,090

 1,083

 512

 639

 248

 587

 413

 125

 287

 7

 9

 9

 278

 365

 109

 118

 91

 44

 8

 8

 422

 398

 62

 394

 398

 39

POWER

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

SPILL

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

OUTLET

 11

 15

 14

 17

 14

 17

 17

 12

 29

 24

 14

 20

 11

 5

 12

 14

 5

 3

 32

 9

 8

 11

 2

 8

 8

 8

 6

 14

 8

 5

C.F.S.

 .07

 .10

 .09

 .11

 .09

 .11

 .11

 .08

 .19

 .16

 .09

 .13

 .07

 .03

 .08

 .09

 .03

 .02

 .21

 .06

 .05

 .07

 .01

 .05

 .05

 .05

 .04

 .09

 .05

 .03

INCHES

 1.42

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .57

 .08

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .02

 .02

 .05

 .31

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .31

 .20

PRECIP

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

NOVEMBER 2014 NEW MELONES LAKE DAILY OPERATIONS RUN DATE: December 2, 2014

IN LAKE

EVAPORATION

INCHES

C.F.S.

COMPUTED*

1000 ACRE-FEET

RELEASE - C.F.S.

TOTALS +.0 11,162 10,910 0 0 373 2.41 2.98

ACRE-FEET +0 22,140 21,640 0 0 740

COMMENTS:

* COMPUTED INFLOW IS THE SUM OF CHANGE IN STORAGE, RELEASES AND EVAPORATION.

SUMMARY

RELEASE (ACRE-FEET)

POWER 21,640

SPILL 0

OUTLET

TOTAL

 0

 21,640

PRECIPITATION

THIS MONTH =

TO DATE =

 2.98

JULY 1, 2014 3.95

 513.3

Table 13
§ 9.213 Snipes Mountain. ( a ) *Name.* The name of the viticultural area described in this section is “Snipes Mountain”. For purposes of part 4 of this chapter, “Snipes Mountain” is a term of viticultural significance.
( b ) *Approved maps.* The two United States Geological Survey 1:24,000 scale topographic maps used to determine the boundary of the Snipes Mountain viticultural area are titled: ( 1 ) Sunnyside, Wash., 1965, photo revised 1978; and
( 2 ) Granger, Wash., 1965.
( c ) *Boundary.* The Snipes Mountain viticultural area is located in Yakima County, Washington. The boundary of the Snipes Mountain viticultural area is as described below: ( 1 ) The beginning point is on the Sunnyside map, to the southwest of the town of Sunnyside, at the intersection of South Hill Road and the eastern boundary of section 34, T10N, R22E. From the beginning point, proceed south along the eastern boundary of section 34 for less than 0.1 mile to its intersection with the 750-foot elevation line, T10N, R22E; then
( 2 ) Proceed along the 750-foot elevation line, first southeasterly then westerly, to its first intersection with the Union Pacific railroad line in section 31, T10N, R22E; then
( 3 ) Proceed west-northwesterly along the Union Pacific railroad line, crossing onto the Granger map, and continue along the railroad line to its intersection with the northern boundary of section 27, T10N, R21E; then
( 4 ) Proceed north in a straight line for less than 0.1 mile to the line's intersection with the 820-foot elevation line in section 22, T10N, R21E; then
( 5 ) Proceed along the meandering 820-foot elevation line, first northwesterly then easterly, and, returning to the Sunnyside map, continue along the elevation line to its intersection with the northern boundary of section 34, T10N, R22E; then
( 6 ) Proceed east along the northern boundary line of section 34 and then section 35 to its intersection with the 820-foot elevation line, section 35, T10N, R22E; then
( 7 ) Proceed southwesterly along the 820-foot elevation line to its intersection with the eastern boundary of section 34, T10N, R22E; and then
( 8 ) Proceed south along the eastern boundary of section 34 for approximately 0.2 mile, returning to the point of beginning.
[T.D. TTB-73, 74 FR 3424, Jan. 21, 2009]
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY ELEV

 1,901.04

 1,901.14

 1,901.12

 1,900.94

 1,901.04

 1,900.80

 1,900.54

 1,900.93

 1,901.28

 1,901.10

 1,901.03

 1,901.03

 1,901.21

 1,901.16

 1,901.28

 1,901.18

 1,901.24

 1,901.28

 1,901.12

 1,901.23

 1,901.22

 1,900.67

 1,900.99

 1,901.06

 1,901.15

 1,901.34

 1,901.42

 1,901.42

 1,901.39

 1,901.50

 1,901.35

 13,941

 14,016

 14,001

 13,867

 13,941

 13,764

 13,572

 13,859

 14,120

 13,986

 13,933

 13,933

 14,068

 14,031

 14,120

 14,046

 14,091

 14,120

 14,001

 14,083

 14,076

 13,668

 13,904

 13,956

 14,023

 14,165

 14,225

 14,225

 14,203

 14,285

 14,173

STORAGE

-30

+75

-15

-134

+74

-177

-192

+287

+261

-134

-53

+0

+135

-37

+89

-74

+45

+29

-119

+82

-7

-408

+236

+52

+67

+142

+60

+0

-22

+82

-112

CHANGE

1,514

1,132

1,286

1,296

1,299

1,388

1,416

1,635

1,659

1,357

1,422

1,329

1,202

662

373

649

863

536

494

913

886

1,113

1,032

882

900

1,076

670

609

317

511

435

INFLOW

 80

 80

 80

 80

 80

 80

 80

 80

 80

 80

 77

 80

 80

 80

 80

 80

 80

 80

 80

 80

 80

 80

 80

 80

 80

 80

 80

 80

 80

 80

 80

POWER

 153

 146

 142

 141

 140

 141

 140

 138

 140

 141

 135

 142

 143

 182

 218

 219

 216

 214

 215

 212

 213

 211

 212

 211

 212

 208

 205

 220

 218

 221

 222

SPILL

 80

 80

 80

 80

 80

 80

 80

 80

 80

 80

 77

 80

 80

 49

 20

 20

 20

 20

 20

 20

 20

 20

 20

 20

 20

 20

 20

 20

 20

 20

 20

OUTLETS

 1

 2

 1

 2

 2

 3

 3

 2

 2

 3

 3

 2

 2

 1

 0

 1

 2

 2

 3

 1

 0

 1

 3

 2

 1

 5

 0

 0

 0

 1

 0

C.F.S.

 .05

 .08

 .05

 .09

 .08

 .12

 .14

 .07

 .11

 .12

 .14

 .07

 .13

 .05

 .01

 .06

 .09

 .11

 .12

 .03

 .02

 .03

 .13

 .07

 .04

 .21

 .00

 .02

 .02

 .04

 .01

INCHES

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

MARCH 2012 LEWISTON LAKE DAILY OPERATIONS RUN DATE: May 3, 2012

IN LAKE

EVAPORATION

C.F.S. FRANCIS CARR

COMPUTED*

ACRE-FEET

RELEASE - C.F.S. 

TOTALS +202 30,856 2,477 1,426 5,671 51 2.31

ACRE-FEET +202 61,203 4,913 2,828 11,248 101

* COMPUTED INFLOW IS THE SUM OF CHANGE IN STORAGE, RELEASES AND EVAPORATION.

(1) OUTLET RELEASE INCLUDES THE CONTINUOUS FISH RELEASE OF 75 C.F.S.

(2) INCHES OF EVAPORATION TAKEN FROM PAN AT TRINITY RIVER HATCHERY

SUMMARY

RELEASE (ACRE-FEET)

TOTAL POWER 4,913

TOTAL RIVER 18,989 60,900

 13,971

 41,911

RIVER

JUDGE FRANCIS CARR POWERPLANT

TOTAL RELEASE

JUDGE (2)

(1) POWERPLANT

 1,215

 786

 991

 1,061

 960

 1,173

 1,210

 1,190

 1,225

 1,121

 1,157

 1,025

 829

 369

 10

 366

 522

 205

 236

 559

 577

 1,007

 598

 543

 553

 691

 335

 289

 10

 148

 169

 21,130

 41,911
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 12.3
                                   PACCAR Inc

                COMPUTATION OF RATIO OF EARNINGS TO FIXED CHARGES
                     PURSUANT TO SEC REPORTING REQUIREMENTS
                             (Thousands of Dollars)




                                                            Nine Months Ended
                                                              September 30
                                                            1996         1995
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
FIXED CHARGES
  Interest expense
    PACCAR Inc and subsidiaries (1)                      $  97,487    $  90,393
  Portion of rentals deemed interest                         4,414        4,295
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

TOTAL FIXED CHARGES                                      $ 101,901    $  94,688
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------


EARNINGS
  Income before taxes -
    PACCAR Inc and subsidiaries                          $ 219,168    $ 295,655
  Fixed charges                                            101,901       94,688
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

EARNINGS AS DEFINED                                      $ 321,069    $ 390,343
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------



RATIO OF EARNINGS TO FIXED CHARGES                           3.15X        4.12X
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------



(1) Exclusive of interest, if any, paid to PACCAR Inc.


                                      -13-
§ 9.166 Diamond Mountain District. ( a ) *Name.* The name of the viticultural area described in this section is “Diamond Mountain District.”
( b ) *Approved map.* The appropriate maps for determining the boundary of the Diamond Mountain District viticultural area are two 1:24,000 Scale U.S.G.S. topography maps. They are titled: ( 1 ) Mark West Springs, CA 1993
( 2 ) Calistoga, CA 1993.
( c ) *Boundaries.* The viticultural area is located in Napa County, California. The beginning point is where the boundary between Napa and Sonoma counties intersects Petrified Forest Road in Section 3 of Township 8 North, Range 7 West, Mount Diablo Base and Meridian on the Mark West Springs map; ( 1 ) Then north and east along Petrified Forest Road approximately 1.9 miles to the point where it intersects the 400-foot contour just east of Section 35 of Township 9 North, Range 7 West, Mount Diablo Base and Meridian, in the Mallacomes land grant;
( 2 ) Then generally east southeast along the 400-foot contour approximately 6.5 miles to the point where it intersects Ritchey Creek in Section 3 of Township 8 North, Range 6 West, Mount Diablo Base and Meridian;
( 3 ) Then west southwest along Ritchey Creek approximately 2.2 miles to the point where it intersects the boundary between Sections 17 and 20 of Township 8 North, Range 6 West, Mount Diablo Base and Meridian;
( 4 ) Then due west in a straight line along the section boundary approximately 0.8 miles to the point where it intersects the boundary between Napa and Sonoma Counties between Sections 18 and 19 of Township 8 North, Range 6 West, Mount Diablo Base and Meridian;
( 5 ) Then generally northwest along the boundary between Napa and Sonoma Counties approximately 4.2 miles to the point where it intersects Petrified Forest Road, to the point of beginning.
[T.D. ATF-456, 66 FR 29698, June 1, 2001]
#### Bernard Leopold, Plaintiff, *v.*Abraham Heymann, Defendant.

Second Department,

June 5, 1914.

Appellate Division — submission of controversy — statement of evidentiary facts only insufficient.

Evidentiary facts in an agreed statement, with no ultimate facts, do not present a case for disposition by the Appellate Division under section 1379 of the Code of Civil Procedure.

Where an agreed statement of facts merely sets forth that in a prior action to determine claims to real property an effort was made to reach and bar one L. and wife and other defendants whose existence was in doubt, and the summons ran against L. and three other persons named, or if dead, against them widows, heirs and grantees, the court will not decide whether jurisdiction was acquired over the necessary parties so as to cut off them possible adverse interests, but the proceeding will be dismissed without prejudice to relief by action. *(Cerfv. Diener,*310 N. Y. 156,163, followed.)

Submission of a controversy upon an agreed statement of facts, pursuant to section 1279 of the Code of Civil Procedure.

*Adam Christmann, Jr.,*for the plaintiff.

*Harry Percy David,*for the defendant.

Per Curiam:

Plaintiff and defendant entered into a contract for the sale of Flatbush land, for which plaintiff agreed to pay $7,500. The plaintiff, however, objected to the title on account of the form of the summons in a prior action under section 1638 of the *17Code of Civil Procedure to determine claims to real property. In this action an effort was made to reach and bar William Lyons and wife, and other defendants, whose existence was in doubt, so that the summons ran against William Lyons and three other persons named, or if dead, against their widows and heirs and grantees, all of whom had been proceeded against through service by publication. Upon this submission the court is asked whether, in this prior suit, jurisdiction over the necessary parties has been acquired, so as to cut off such adverse possible interests.

On an agreed statement of facts this court can draw no inferences, and is bound strictly to the facts set out as conceded. Herein we are different from a trial court, which could infer the conclusions to which these facts point. Such evidentiary facts in an agreed statement, with no ultimate facts, do not present a case for disposition by this court under section 1279 of the Code of Civil Procedure.

Hence we have to dismiss these proceedings without prejudice to relief by an action, and without costs to either party, following *Cerf*v. *Diener*(210 N. Y. 156, 162).

Jenks, P. J., Burr, Rich, Stapleton and Putnam, JJ., concurred.

Proceedings dismissed, without prejudice to relief by an action, and without costs to either party, following *Cerf*v. *Diener*(210 N. Y. 156, 162).
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

DAY

 481.37

 481.37

 481.33

 480.95

 480.40

 479.72

 479.34

 478.96

 478.59

 478.21

 477.82

 477.21

 476.50

 475.82

 475.16

 474.47

 473.75

 472.73

 472.03

 471.31

 470.75

 470.05

 469.34

 468.59

 467.88

 466.87

 465.86

 465.10

 464.35

 463.58

 1,299,152

 1,299,152

 1,298,716

 1,294,572

 1,288,583

 1,281,190

 1,277,065

 1,272,945

 1,268,937

 1,264,825

 1,260,610

 1,254,026

 1,246,377

 1,239,047

 1,231,971

 1,224,588

 1,216,898

 1,206,031

 1,198,591

 1,190,954

 1,185,025

 1,177,627

 1,170,139

 1,162,245

 1,154,788

 1,144,208

 1,133,658

 1,125,741

 1,117,945

 1,109,961

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 3,630

 0

 3,618

 3,585

 3,592

 3,598

 3,388

 3,736

 7,365

 7,114

 3,579

 3,589

 0

 2,683

 3,602

 6,337

 4,533

 3,718

 3,705

 7,417

 7,447

 0

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

SAN LUIS RESERVOIR FEDERAL July 11, 2013

DAILY OPERATIONS

APRIL 2013 RUN DATE:

FEDERAL

CHANGE CHANGE

PACHECO

PUMP

TOTALS -188,864 86,236 14,974 -99,571

FEDERAL

PUMP ADJ

FEDERAL

GEN

 327

 0

-436

-4,144

-5,989

-7,393

-4,125

-4,120

-4,008

-4,112

-4,215

-6,584

-7,649

-7,330

-7,076

-7,383

-7,690

-10,867

-7,440

-7,637

-5,929

-7,398

-7,488

-7,894

-7,457

-10,580

-10,550

-7,917

-7,796

-7,984

 410

 407

 403

 368

 379

 383

 365

 409

 417

 437

 435

 427

 432

 414

 434

 434

 433

 535

 594

 640

 619

 622

 634

 636

 648

 649

 650

 614

 617

 529

-78

-224

-418

-161

-462

-271

-433

-454

-4,038

-466

-4,130

-3,940

-4,034

-3,893

-3,882

-4,131

-7,882

-7,514

-4,076

-4,200

-493

-3,179

-4,160

-7,086

-5,103

-4,188

-4,203

-7,961

-7,955

-556

ELEV STORAGE

 0

 778,314

 778,090

 777,672

 777,511

 777,049

 776,778

 776,345

 775,891

 771,853

 771,387

 767,257

 763,317

 759,283

 755,390

 751,508

 747,377

 739,495

 731,981

 727,905

 723,705

 723,212

 720,033

 715,873

 708,787

 703,684

 699,496

 695,293

 687,332

 679,377

 678,821

FEDERAL

STORAGE

COMMENTS : 

VALUES IN ACRE-FEET

 778,392

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0
#### Marguerite Grynkraut, Respondent, v. Jobe Corporation, Appellant.

■ Judgment unanimously affirmed, with costs. No opinion. Present — Dore, J. P., Cohn, Callahan, l[an Voorhis and Shientag, JJ. [See 274 App. Div. 763.1
No. 12,036.

#### Gasper *v.*The People.

Decided February 27, 1928.

Rehearing denied March 19, 1928.

Plaintiff in error was convicted of owning, possessing, and operating a still for the manufacture of intoxicating liquor.

*Affirmed.*

*On Application for Supersedeas.*

1. New *Trial*— Motion—Newly *Discovered Evidence.*Motions for new trials based upon newly discovered evidence, are regarded with suspicion and disfavor and are left to the sound discretion of the trial judge whose action in denying such motions will not be reversed, except for gross abuse of discretion.

*Error to the District Court of Pueblo County, Hon. James A. Park, Judge.*

Mr. A. T. Stewart, Mr. John A. Martin, for plaintiff in error.

*342Miv. William L. Boatright, Attorney General, Mr. William W. Gaunt, Assistant, for the people.

*Department One.*

Mr. Justice Whiteord

delivered the opinion of the court.

The defendant was charged with owning, possessing, and operating a still for the manufacture of intoxicating liquor, and he comes here on error to review the judgment on a verdict -against him, and moves for a supersedeas.

The only, assignment of error urged upon the application for a supersedeas is the action of the district court, denying defendant’s motion for a new trial, which was based upon the ground of newly discovered evidence.

It is clear, from an examination of the transcript, that the matters presented in the motion and affidavit for a new trial did not constitute newly discovered evidence, but related to alleged facts, about which defendant himself gave testimony upon the trial. The proposed witness, and the evidence which the defendant said the witness would give upon a new trial, was all within the knowledge of the defendant before the trial. This proposed evidence did not constitute newly discovered evidence. The remedy of defendant, if any, was a motion for continuance. The showing made by the defendant, on the grounds of newly discovered evidence, was insufficient. It was bad on its face.

“Motions for new trials, based upon newly discovered evidence, are regarded with suspicion and disfavor, and are left to the sound discretion of the trial judge whose action in denying such motions will not be reversed except for gross -abuse of discretion.” *Sebold v. Rieger,*26 Colo. App. 209, 142 Pac. 201; *Eachus v. People,*77 Colo. 445, 236 Pac. 1009.

*343It is clear, in this state of the record, that the court did not commit reversible' error in denying the motion for new trial.

Judgment affirmed.

Mr. Chief Justice Denison, Mr. Justice Burke, and Mr. Justice Walker concur.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY

 381.25

 381.20

 381.08

 380.99

 381.32

 381.66

 382.45

 382.98

 383.33

 383.69

 383.46

 382.95

 382.72

 382.98

 383.31

 383.05

 382.92

 382.39

 382.30

 382.40

 382.40

 382.30

 381.97

 381.73

 382.09

 382.48

 382.78

 383.00

 383.15

 383.44

 384.00

 381,906

 381,552

 380,703

 380,067

 382,402

 384,814

 390,438

 394,228

 396,738

 399,326

 397,672

 394,013

 392,367

 394,228

 396,594

 394,729

 393,798

 390,010

 389,368

 390,081

 390,081

 389,368

 387,017

 385,311

 387,871

 390,652

 392,796

 394,371

 395,446

 397,528

 401,559

 0

 0

 0

 0

 1,542

 3,090

 3,106

 3,074

 3,005

 2,986

 0

 0

 0

 3,032

 3,004

 0

 0

 0

 0

 1,532

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 1,544

 1,522

 1,517

 1,525

 3,041

 3,081

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

SAN LUIS RESERVOIR FEDERAL November 4, 2009

DAILY OPERATIONS

AUGUST 2009 RUN DATE:

FEDERAL

CHANGE CHANGE

PACHECO

PUMP

TOTALS 21,068 0 11,946 29,884

FEDERAL

PUMP ADJ

FEDERAL

GEN

 1,415

-354

-849

-636

 2,335

 2,412

 5,624

 3,790

 2,510

 2,588

-1,654

-3,659

-1,646

 1,861

 2,366

-1,865

-931

-3,788

-642

 713

 0

-713

-2,351

-1,706

 2,560

 2,781

 2,144

 1,575

 1,075

 2,082

 4,031

 420

 384

 411

 413

 390

 370

 367

 362

 322

 380

 419

 467

 391

 411

 368

 334

 385

 378

 379

 404

 392

 379

 325

 360

 374

 380

 385

 404

 376

 385

 431

-118

-371

-608

-513

906

2,316

2,513

2,527

2,528

2,522

-11

-631

-533

2,200

2,439

-166

219

-1,067

-497

903

-216

-529

-497

-775

-666

1,150

825

1,160

4,079

5,317

5,478

ELEV STORAGE

 36,601

-2,338

-2,709

-3,317

-3,830

-2,924

-608

 1,905

 4,432

 6,960

 9,482

 9,471

 8,840

 8,307

 10,507

 12,946

 12,780

 12,999

 11,932

 11,435

 12,338

 12,122

 11,593

 11,096

 10,321

 9,655

 10,805

 11,630

 12,790

 16,869

 22,186

 27,664

FEDERAL

STORAGE

COMMENTS : 

VALUES IN ACRE-FEET

-2,220

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

3,000

3,000

3,000

9,000
Editorial Note on Part 4
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 4 appear by T.D. ATF-425, 65 FR 11890, Mar. 7, 2000.

§ 4.70 Application. ( a ) Except as provided in paragraph (b) of this section, no person engaged in business as a producer, rectifier, blender, importer, or wholesaler of wine, directly or indirectly or through an affiliate, shall sell or ship or deliver for sale or shipment, or otherwise introduce in interstate or foreign commerce, or receive therein, or remove from customs custody, any wine unless such wine is bottled or packed in the standard wine containers herein prescribed.
( b ) Sections 4.71 and 4.72 of this part do not apply to: ( 1 ) Sake;
( 2 ) Wine packed in containers of 18 liters or more;
( 3 ) Imported wine in the original containers in which entered customs custody if the wine was bottled or packed before January 1, 1979;
( 4 ) Imported wine bottled or packed before January 1, 1979, and certified as to such in a statement, available to the appropriate TTB officer upon request, signed by an official duly authorized by the appropriate foreign government; or
( 5 ) Wine domestically bottled or packed, either in or out of customs custody, before October 24, 1943, if the container, or the label on the container, bears a conspicuous statement of the net contents, and if the actual capacity of the container is not substantially less than the apparent capacity upon visual examination under ordinary conditions of purchase or use.
( c ) Section 4.72 of this part does not apply to wine domestically bottled or packed, either in or out of customs custody, before January 1, 1979, if the wine was bottled or packed according to the standards of fill (listed in ounces, quarts, and gallons) prescribed by regulation before that date.
(Approved by the Office of Management and Budget under control number 1513-0064) [T.D. ATF-12, 39 FR 45222, Dec. 31, 1974, as amended by T.D. ATF-49, 43 FR 19848, May 9, 1978; T.D. ATF-76, 46 FR 1727, Jan. 7, 1981; T.D. TTB-91, 76 FR 5477, Feb. 1, 2011; T.D. TTB-145, 81 FR 94197, Dec. 22, 2016]