alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY HIGH

 2,641

 3,508

 3,924

 4,540

 4,184

 3,872

 3,970

 4,001

 3,694

 3,296

 3,038

 2,901

 3,025

 3,063

 3,692

 3,683

 3,332

 3,453

 3,687

 3,700

 3,959

 3,405

 2,764

 2,134

 1,911

 2,301

 2,251

 2,277

 2,255

 2,227

 3,067

 1,006

 1,116

 1,166

 1,184

 1,142

 1,055

 1,090

 1,236

 1,249

 1,242

 1,278

 1,283

 1,243

 1,258

 1,218

 1,225

 1,222

 1,179

 1,197

 1,256

 1,228

 1,183

 1,129

 1,030

 1,085

 1,009

 1,058

 1,096

 1,104

 1,125

 1,095

 1,526

 1,897

 2,191

 2,206

 2,030

 2,021

 2,006

 2,033

 1,990

 1,943

 1,825

 1,831

 1,767

 1,786

 1,900

 1,826

 1,791

 1,840

 1,887

 1,927

 2,045

 1,823

 1,626

 1,454

 1,379

 1,350

 1,369

 1,348

 1,410

 1,470

 1,672

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

MAY 2015 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: June 1, 2015

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

14 DAY

ACCUM

MEAN

14 DAY

AVG

MEAN

 19,022

 19,887

 20,866

 21,647

 22,121

 22,730

 23,275

 23,711

 24,178

 24,843

 25,493

 26,089

 26,590

 27,052

 27,426

 27,355

 26,955

 26,589

 26,446

 26,352

 26,391

 26,181

 25,817

 25,328

 24,882

 24,401

 24,003

 23,565

 23,075

 22,719

 22,600

 1,359

 1,421

 1,490

 1,546

 1,580

 1,624

 1,663

 1,694

 1,727

 1,775

 1,821

 1,864

 1,899

 1,932

 1,959

 1,954

 1,925

 1,899

 1,889

 1,882

 1,885

 1,870

 1,844

 1,809

 1,777

 1,743

 1,715

 1,683

 1,648

 1,623

 1,614

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

JERSEY POINT TOP ON THE SAN JOAQUIN RIVER
Exhibit 4.3


 


Consent of Independent Registered
Public Accounting Firm


We consent to the
reference made to our firm under the caption “Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm” in Part B of the Prospectus
and to the use of our report dated June 24, 2015, in this Registration Statement (Form S-6 No. 333-203786) of Smart Trust, Morningstar
Dividend Yield Focus Trust, Series 10.


 


/s/ Grant
Thornton LLP


 


Chicago, Illinois


June 24, 2015
(No. 73-CC-414

#### American Institute of Real Estate Appraisers of the National Association of Real Estate Boards, An Illinois Not-For-Profit Corporation, Claimant, *vs.*State of Illinois, Department of Transportation, Respondent.

*Opinion filed October 18, 1973.*

McDermott, Will & Emery, Attorney for Claimant.

William J. Scott, Attorney General; Saul R. Wexler, Assistant Attorney General, for Respondent.

Per Curiam.
§ 771.123 Court review. ( a ) If an applicant, licensee, or permittee files an appeal in the United States Court of Appeals for the circuit in which he resides or has his principle place of business, within 60 days after the receipt of the Director's decision, the Director, upon notification that an appeal has been taken, shall prepare the record for submission to the court in accordance with applicable court rules.
( b ) If an applicant, licensee, or permittee does not seek review with the Director, but instead seeks review within 60 days after the receipt of the initial decision of the Director of Industry Operations pursuant to § 771.109, the Director of Industry Operations, upon notification that an appeal has been taken, shall prepare the record for submission to the court in accordance with applicable court rules. The Director of Industry Operations shall notify the Director if such an appeal is taken.
( c ) The Director, or the Director of Industry Operations, as the case may be, shall certify the correctness of the transcript of the record, forward one copy to the attorney for the Government in the review of the case, and file the original record of the proceedings with the original certificate in the appropriate United States Court of Appeals.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY ELEV

 360.05

 360.08

 360.05

 360.08

 360.05

 360.08

 360.08

 360.08

 360.08

 360.08

 360.08

 360.08

 360.08

 360.08

 360.08

 360.08

 360.08

 360.08

 360.08

 360.08

 360.08

 360.05

 360.06

 360.05

 360.05

 360.05

 360.05

 360.02

 360.62

 360.02

 360.02

 541

 543

 541

 543

 541

 543

 543

 543

 543

 543

 543

 543

 543

 543

 543

 543

 543

 543

 543

 543

 543

 541

 541

 541

 541

 541

 541

 538

 580

 538

 538

STORAGE

-2

+2

-2

+2

-2

+2

+0

+0

+0

+0

+0

+0

+0

+0

+0

+0

+0

+0

+0

+0

+0

-2

+0

+0

+0

+0

+0

-3

+42

-42

+0

CHANGE

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 379

 378

 375

 374

 378

 378

 378

 376

 374

 377

 375

 373

 371

 372

 373

 372

 372

 375

 371

 369

 372

 365

 342

 346

 344

 341

 340

 332

 316

 317

 316

SPILL

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

OUTLET

OAKDALE IRRIGATION DISTRICT

SOUTH SAN JOAQUIN IRRIGATION DISTRICT

TRI DAMS PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

DECEMBER 2000 GOODWIN RESERVOIR DAILY OPERATIONS RUN DATE: September 14, 2004

RES.

ACRE-FEET

RELEASE - C.F.S. 

TOTALS -5 0 11,221 0

ACRE-FEET -5 0 22,257 0

SUMMARY

RELEASE (ACRE-FEET)

JOINT MAIN CANAL 63

SOUTH MAIN CANAL 0

 22,320

 543

OUTLET 0

TOTAL 

TULLOCH

RELEASE

 415

 413

 411

 411

 413

 415

 397

 414

 415

 416

 415

 413

 411

 411

 412

 413

 413

 413

 408

 400

 398

 395

 380

 384

 381

 380

 380

 372

 360

 359

 359

 12,377

 24,550

JOINT MAIN OPERATED BY SSJID AND OID.

SOUTH MAIN OPERATED BY OID.

JOINT

MAIN

SOUTH

MAIN

SPILL 22,257

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 3

 3

 3

 3

 2

 2

 2

 2

 2

 1

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 3

 2

 2

 1

 1

 32

 63

RIVER CANALS
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

DAY ELEV

 123.12

 123.14

 123.25

 122.90

 122.65

 123.10

 123.14

 123.00

 124.33

 123.48

 123.31

 123.74

 122.75

 123.23

 122.79

 122.84

 124.08

 123.58

 124.49

 124.30

 123.50

 123.61

 123.50

 123.80

 123.55

 123.90

 123.62

 124.50

 124.32

 123.88

 7,847

 7,857

 7,909

 7,746

 7,634

 7,838

 7,857

 7,791

 8,426

 8,017

 7,937

 8,139

 7,679

 7,899

 7,697

 7,719

 8,301

 8,064

 8,506

 8,411

 8,026

 8,078

 8,026

 8,167

 8,050

 8,214

 8,082

 8,511

 8,421

 8,205

STORAGE

-15

+10

+52

-163

-112

+204

+19

-66

+635

-409

-80

+202

-460

+220

-202

+22

+582

-237

+442

-95

-385

+52

-52

+141

-117

+164

-132

+429

-90

-216

CHANGE

3,174

3,091

3,139

3,108

3,017

5,148

8,085

8,002

7,948

6,225

5,586

5,072

4,434

5,134

5,416

5,612

5,883

5,240

5,036

4,260

3,625

3,331

2,963

3,134

2,991

2,940

2,485

2,774

2,530

2,452

INFLOW

 3,084

 2,984

 3,009

 3,087

 2,501

 2,471

 2,479

 2,481

 2,452

 2,479

 2,474

 1,088

 295

 300

 303

 316

 308

 305

 295

 297

 293

 289

 662

 2,460

 2,444

 2,450

 2,443

 2,452

 2,474

 2,461

POWER

 0

 0

 0

 0

 469

 2,469

 5,488

 5,447

 5,069

 3,844

 3,040

 3,774

 4,263

 4,618

 5,112

 5,180

 5,180

 4,952

 4,414

 3,909

 3,423

 2,916

 2,222

 500

 501

 295

 0

 0

 0

 0

SPILL

 60

 60

 60

 60

 60

 60

 60

 60

 60

 60

 60

 60

 60

 60

 60

 60

 60

 60

 60

 60

 60

 60

 60

 60

 60

 60

 59

 60

 60

 60

HATCHERY

 2

 2

 4

 3

 3

 3

 3

 2

 2

 3

 7

 3

 3

 3

 3

 5

 2

 2

 4

 2

 3

 0

 5

 3

 5

 12

 10

 6

 1

 0

C.F.S.

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

APRIL 2004 LAKE NATOMA DAILY OPERATIONS RUN DATE: May 20, 2004

IN LAKE

EVAP

C.F.S.

COMPUTED*

ACRE-FEET

RELEASE - C.F.S.

TOTALS +343 131,835 51,436 77,085 1,799 106

ACRE-FEET +343 261,495 102,023 152,898 3,568 210

COMMENTS:

* COMPUTED INFLOW IS THE SUM OF CHANGE IN STORAGE, RELEASES AND EVAPORATION.

SUMMARY

RELEASES (ACRE-FEET)

POWER 102,023

SPILL 152,898

FOLSOM SOUTH CANAL

HATCHERY

 2,450

 3,568

 7,862

FOLSOM

SOUTH 

CANAL

 36

 40

 40

 40

 40

 42

 45

 45

 45

 45

 45

 45

 45

 42

 40

 40

 40

 40

 40

 40

 40

 40

 40

 40

 40

 40

 40

 40

 40

 40

 1,235

 2,450

(1)

(1) INCHES OF EVAPORATION TAKEN FROM FOLSOM PAN.

RELEASES (ACRE-FEET)

TOTAL 260,939

Table 12
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

DAY ELEV

 945.89

 945.95

 945.77

 945.80

 945.87

 945.95

 946.07

 946.15

 946.20

 946.24

 946.30

 946.37

 946.42

 946.47

 946.50

 946.57

 946.61

 946.66

 946.73

 946.96

 947.11

 947.18

 947.26

 947.33

 947.34

 947.39

 947.38

 947.45

 947.48

 947.54

 1,025.2

 1,025.6

 1,024.3

 1,024.5

 1,025.0

 1,025.6

 1,026.5

 1,027.1

 1,027.4

 1,027.7

 1,028.2

 1,028.7

 1,029.1

 1,029.4

 1,029.6

 1,030.2

 1,030.4

 1,030.8

 1,031.3

 1,033.0

 1,034.1

 1,034.6

 1,035.2

 1,035.7

 1,035.8

 1,036.2

 1,036.1

 1,036.6

 1,036.8

 1,037.3

STORAGE

+0.0

+0.4

-1.3

+0.2

+0.5

+0.6

+0.9

+0.6

+0.4

+0.3

+0.4

+0.5

+0.4

+0.4

+0.2

+0.5

+0.3

+0.4

+0.5

+1.7

+1.1

+0.5

+0.6

+0.5

+0.1

+0.4

-0.1

+0.5

+0.2

+0.4

CHANGE

342

348

213

360

684

638

789

684

579

561

634

650

594

575

488

643

522

588

643

1,021

580

621

627

586

532

476

427

487

414

455

INFLOW

 316

 84

 838

 10

 9

 9

 8

 7

 6

 5

 6

 6

 5

 5

 4

 4

 4

 4

 11

 13

 13

 346

 316

 312

 464

 276

 438

 194

 277

 194

POWER

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

SPILL

 0

 0

 0

 204

 358

 298

 295

 334

 349

 349

 349

 349

 349

 349

 349

 349

 349

 349

 349

 125

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

OUTLET

 26

 43

 38

 36

 59

 36

 43

 47

 38

 59

 57

 36

 55

 36

 24

 31

 21

 50

 24

 31

 10

 14

 14

 14

 31

 14

 26

 33

 26

 38

C.F.S.

 .11

 .18

 .16

 .15

 .25

 .15

 .18

 .20

 .16

 .25

 .24

 .15

 .23

 .15

 .10

 .13

 .09

 .21

 .10

 .13

 .04

 .06

 .06

 .06

 .13

 .06

 .11

 .14

 .11

 .16

INCHES

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .61

 .75

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

PRECIP

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

NOVEMBER 2013 NEW MELONES LAKE DAILY OPERATIONS RUN DATE: December 19, 2013

IN LAKE

EVAPORATION

INCHES

C.F.S.

COMPUTED*

1000 ACRE-FEET

RELEASE - C.F.S.

TOTALS +12.1 16,761 4,184 0 5,453 1,010 4.25 1.36

ACRE-FEET +12,100 33,245 8,299 0 10,816 2,003

COMMENTS:

* COMPUTED INFLOW IS THE SUM OF CHANGE IN STORAGE, RELEASES AND EVAPORATION.

SUMMARY

RELEASE (ACRE-FEET)

POWER 8,299

SPILL 0

OUTLET

TOTAL

 10,816

 19,115

PRECIPITATION

THIS MONTH =

TO DATE =

 1.36

JULY 1, 2013 2.12

 1,025.2

Table 13
Editorial Note on Part 555
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 555 appear by T.D. ATF-487, 68 FR 3748, Jan. 24, 2003.

§ 555.213 Quantity and storage restrictions. ( a ) Explosive materials in excess of 300,000 pounds or detonators in excess of 20 million are not to be stored in one magazine unless approved by the Director.
( b ) Detonators are not to be stored in the same magazine with other explosive materials, except under the following circumstances: ( 1 ) In a type 4 magazine, detonators that will not mass detonate may be stored with electric squibs, safety fuse, shock tube, igniters, and igniter cord.
( 2 ) In a type 1 or type 2 magazine, detonators may be stored with delay devices and any of the items listed in paragraph (b)(1) of this section.
[T.D. ATF-487, 68 FR 3748, Jan. 24, 2003, as amended by ATF 15F, 75 FR 3163, Jan. 20, 2010]
### §1502. Resistance to extradition agent

Whoever knowingly and willfully obstructs, resists, or opposes an extradition agent of the United States in the execution of his duties, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than one year, or both.

(June 24, 1948, ch. 645, 62 Stat. 769; Pub. L. 103–322, title XXXIII, §330016(1)(F), Sept. 13, 1994, 108 Stat. 2147.)

#### Historical and Revision Notes

Based on title 18, U.S.C., 1940 ed., §661 (R.S. 5277).

Said section 661 of title 18, U.S.C., 1940 ed., was incorporated in this section and section 752 of this title.

Words "an extradition agent of the United States" were substituted for "such agent" which was referred to in sections 3182 et seq. of this title.

A fine of "$300" was substituted for "$1,000" as the mandatory maximum to harmonize with similar offenses in this chapter. (See section 1501 of this title.)

Punishment provision was rephrased in the alternative.

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

1994—Pub. L. 103–322 substituted "fined under this title" for "fined not more than $300".
[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 68 (Friday, April 8, 2011)]
[Notices]
[Page 19746]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2011-8452]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

Foreign-Trade Zones Board

[Order No. 1749]


Expansion of Foreign-Trade Zone 133; Quad-Cities, IL/IA

    Pursuant to its authority under the Foreign-Trade Zones Act of 
June 18, 1934, as amended (19 U.S.C. 81a-81u), the Foreign-Trade 
Zones Board (the Board) adopts the following Order:

    Whereas, the Quad-City Foreign Trade Zone, Inc., grantee of 
Foreign-Trade Zone 133, submitted an application to the Board for 
authority to expand FTZ 133 in the Quad-Cities, Iowa/Illinois area, 
adjacent to the Quad-Cities Customs and Border Protection port of entry 
(FTZ Docket 15-2010, filed 3/5/2010);
    Whereas, notice inviting public comment has been given in the 
Federal Register (75 FR 12729, 3/17/2010) and the application has been 
processed pursuant to the FTZ Act and the Board's regulations; and,
    Whereas, the Board adopts the findings and recommendations of the 
examiner's report, and finds that the requirements of the FTZ Act and 
Board's regulations are satisfied, and that the proposal is in the 
public interest;
    Now, therefore, the Board hereby orders:
    The application to expand FTZ 133 is approved, subject to the FTZ 
Act and the Board's regulations, including Section 400.28, and to the 
Board's standard 2,000-acre activation limit for the overall general-
purpose zone project, and further subject to a sunset provision that 
would terminate authority on March 31, 2018 for Sites 1, 3, 4 and 5 
where no activity has occurred under FTZ procedures before that date.

    Signed at Washington, DC this 31st day of March 2011.
Ronald K. Lorentzen,
Deputy Assistant Secretary for Import Administration, Alternate 
Chairman, Foreign-Trade Zones Board.
Andrew McGilvray,
Executive Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2011-8452 Filed 4-7-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3610-DS-P
OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF TEXAS 

i’ AUSTIN 

non* L* A* wooha 

state superintendent OS 

pub110 Instruction 

Austin, Texar 

This will 

February 7, 192&J, 

Pebruory 9, ¶Qg3B 

aj4 

so that the 

Mly enacted. 

d the caption OS the above 

eolf, and we do find a variance 

the caption and the last sontence 

y call fo your attention the case of 

001 District et al vs. Earrs by the Comd Sound In 41 8. W. Czd) p 9, thich case 

we believe is In Faint on the question presented. nl? quote 

the lan,aage of the court In passing upon the Act OS the Leglelature then in question: 

. 

.The langunge of the title thereoi not 

olear in some roapeote is sufficient we think to 

apprise the ordinary mind of the Subject matter 
*i :I Eon. L. 

of the body of the Aot. The contention that 

the rubjeot OS the Aot 18 not exjwe88ed in 

the title IS o r er r ulc d l 

The oaption of the Aot before ~8, thoagh at varIauce In tho lost part OS it, Is sutiioient a8 to the 

vhole OS it to give notice of what the Aot oontains. 

We therefore hold that the Article in question has 

been properly enacted by the Legislature.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### National Institutes of Health

                    Notice is hereby given of a change in the meeting of the National Cancer Advisory Board, February 7, 2011, 6:30 p.m. to February 9, 2011, 12 p.m., National Institutes of Health, Building 31, 31 Center Drive, Bethesda, MD 20892 which was published in the                     **Federal Register**                     on December 29, 2010, 75 FR 82035.                

This notice is being amended to cancel the Subcommittee on Clinical Investigations meeting on February 7, 2011 from 6:30 p.m. to 8 p.m. and to cancel the National Cancer Advisory Board Meeting on February 9, 2011 from 9 a.m. to 12 p.m. The meeting will be open to the public on February 8, 2011 from 9 a.m. to 3:15 p.m. and the closed session will be from 3:30 p.m. to 5 p.m. The meeting is partially closed to the public.

Dated: January 11, 2011.

Jennifer S. Spaeth,

Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.

[FR Doc. 2011-872 Filed 1-14-11; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4140-01-P
Exhibit 31.2
I, Victor H.M. Ting, certify that:
1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Trio-Tech International, a Californiacorporation;
2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact oromit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstancesunder which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by thisreport;
3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included inthis report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operationsand cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;
4. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:
     (a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls andprocedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating tothe registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within thoseentities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;
     (b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures andpresented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls andprocedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and
     (c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourthfiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonablylikely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and
5. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the auditcommittee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):
     (a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation ofinternal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect theregistrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and
     (b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have asignificant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.
Dated: February 4, 2005              /s/ VICTOR H.M. TING   Victor H.M. Ting,   Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
Comment Info: =================

General Comment:Petition for exemption
Project Equipment Installation

New Converter Mouth Covers $1,367,000 $5,244,000 Reconfigured Roofline $2,806,000 $27,423,000
Aisle Scrubber $25,046,000 $63,292,000 Upgraded Tailstack Scrubber $2,407,000 $11,986,000 Total with Tailstack Upgrade

High EstimateLow Estimate SO2 escaping primary capture 8,078 3,231 SO2 captured by new mouth covers 6,462 2,585 SO2 newly controlled by primary 6,462 2,585 SO2 captured by enhanced roofline 1,357 543 SO2 controlled by aisle scrubber 1,221 489 SO2 currently emitted through tailstack 495 495 SO2 controlled by upgraded tailstack scrubber 485 485 SO2 controlled by project 8,169 3,558 Cost of control $2,386.06 $5,477.52O&M Annualized Cost interest rate 0.07

$165,000 $789,032 n 20 $1,353,000$4,206,403.75 CRF 0.094393 $3,719,000$12,057,482.27 $1,079,000$2,437,597.38

$19,490,515

tpy - based on 95 - 98 % capture efficiency for existing side flue vent tpy - assumes 80% capture from mouth cover enhancement tpy - assumes 99.69% control in acid plant and 98% in tailstack scrubber tpy - assumes 84% capture of enhanced roofline tpy - assumes 90% control in proposed aisle scrubber tpy - assumes 35% of tailstack emissions from converters tpy - assumes 98% control in upgraded tailstack scrubber tpy - SO2 controlled by aisle scrubber + upgraded tailstack scrubber per ton of SO2 reducedyears