alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

DAY ELEV

 1,010.83

 1,010.61

 1,010.34

 1,010.07

 1,009.89

 1,009.64

 1,009.43

 1,009.22

 1,009.07

 1,008.84

 1,008.59

 1,008.39

 1,008.21

 1,008.08

 1,007.73

 1,007.50

 1,007.32

 1,007.11

 1,006.94

 1,006.77

 1,006.66

 1,006.52

 1,006.35

 1,006.15

 1,005.98

 1,005.82

 1,005.70

 1,005.49

 1,005.33

 1,005.19

 1,572.7

 1,570.6

 1,568.0

 1,565.4

 1,563.7

 1,561.3

 1,559.3

 1,557.3

 1,555.9

 1,553.7

 1,551.4

 1,549.5

 1,547.8

 1,546.5

 1,543.2

 1,541.0

 1,539.3

 1,537.4

 1,535.8

 1,534.2

 1,533.1

 1,531.8

 1,530.2

 1,528.3

 1,526.7

 1,525.2

 1,524.1

 1,522.1

 1,520.6

 1,519.3

STORAGE

-1.7

-2.1

-2.6

-2.6

-1.7

-2.4

-2.0

-2.0

-1.4

-2.2

-2.4

-1.9

-1.7

-1.2

-3.3

-2.2

-1.7

-2.0

-1.6

-1.6

-1.0

-1.3

-1.6

-1.9

-1.6

-1.5

-1.1

-2.0

-1.5

-1.3

CHANGE

397

265

462

407

549

577

517

416

576

414

479

408

453

347

465

366

388

394

341

400

360

406

403

392

339

323

472

373

534

619

INFLOW

 1,163

 1,238

 1,664

 1,609

 1,309

 1,678

 1,402

 1,295

 1,167

 1,426

 1,603

 1,284

 1,222

 883

 2,048

 1,386

 1,157

 1,316

 1,110

 1,128

 794

 985

 1,119

 1,238

 1,064

 1,006

 951

 1,320

 1,245

 1,163

POWER

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

SPILL

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

OUTLET

 102

 87

 99

 99

 105

 99

 123

 129

 129

 89

 71

 80

 92

 86

 86

 76

 89

 79

 40

 79

 88

 85

 91

 103

 82

 73

 88

 46

 45

 118

C.F.S.

 .33

 .28

 .32

 .32

 .34

 .32

 .40

 .42

 .42

 .29

 .23

 .26

 .30

 .28

 .28

 .25

 .29

 .26

 .13

 .26

 .29

 .28

 .30

 .34

 .27

 .24

 .29

 .15

 .15

 .39

INCHES

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .03

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

PRECIP

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

SEPTEMBER 2020 NEW MELONES LAKE DAILY OPERATIONS RUN DATE: October 19, 2020

IN LAKE

EVAPORATION

INCHES

C.F.S.

COMPUTED*

1000 ACRE-FEET

RELEASE - C.F.S.

TOTALS -55.1 12,842 37,973 0 0 2,658 8.68 .03

ACRE-FEET -55,100 25,472 75,319 0 0 5,272

COMMENTS:

* COMPUTED INFLOW IS THE SUM OF CHANGE IN STORAGE, RELEASES AND EVAPORATION.

SUMMARY

RELEASE (ACRE-FEET)

POWER 75,319

SPILL 0

OUTLET

TOTAL

 0

 75,319

PRECIPITATION

THIS MONTH =

TO DATE =

 .03

JULY 1, 2020 .03

 1,574.4

Table 13 

OCT 1, 2019 TO DATE = 22.38
Enclosure 2

ARB Resolution 11-24 approving the Progress Report and Proposed SIP Revisions
August 2023

STORAGE COMPUTED* RELEASE - C.F.S. EVAP

ACRE-FEET INFLOW FOLSOM C. F. S.

DAY ELEV IN LAKE CHANGE C.F.S. SOUTH POWER SPILL HATCHERY (1)

8,012

1 123.86 8,195 183 4,151 35 3,975 0 45 4

2 123.53 8,040 -155 3,981 35 3,975 0 45 4

3 123.76 8,148 108 4,110 35 3,972 0 45 4

4 123.73 8,134 -14 4,053 35 3,977 0 45 3

5 124.26 8,391 257 4,188 35 3,974 0 45 4

6 124.22 8,371 -20 4,050 35 3,975 0 45 5

7 123.83 8,181 -190 3,961 35 3,972 0 45 5

8 124.12 8,321 140 4,132 35 3,977 0 45 4

9 123.15 7,862 -459 3,829 35 3,976 0 45 4

10 124.13 8,326 464 4,291 35 3,973 0 45 4

11 124.35 8,436 110 4,115 35 3,976 0 45 4

12 123.85 8,191 -245 3,935 35 3,975 0 45 4

13 123.69 8,115 -76 4,027 35 3,981 0 45 4

14 122.71 7,661 -454 3,836 35 3,981 0 45 4

15 123.16 7,866 205 4,168 35 3,980 0 45 5

16 123.18 7,876 10 4,066 35 3,981 0 40 5

17 123.51 8,031 155 4,142 35 3,980 0 44 5

18 123.34 7,951 -80 4,031 35 3,979 0 54 3

19 122.73 7,670 -281 3,930 35 3,979 0 54 4

20 122.78 7,692 22 4,080 35 3,977 0 54 3

21 122.80 7,701 9 4,077 35 3,980 0 54 3

22 122.98 7,782 81 4,112 35 3,979 0 54 3

23 123.34 7,951 169 4,155 38 3,974 0 54 4

24 123.56 8,054 103 4,127 40 3,976 0 54 5

25 123.05 7,815 -239 3,961 40 3,984 0 54 3

26 122.61 7,616 -199 3,976 40 3,978 0 54 4

27 122.45 7,544 -72 4,037 40 3,975 0 54 4

28 122.23 7,445 -99 4,026 40 3,978 0 54 4

29 122.30 7,476 31 4,100 40 3,979 0 61 4

30 122.84 7,719 243 4,204 40 3,976 0 61 4

31 123.12 7,847 128 4,147 40 3,977 0 61 4

TOTALS -165 125,998 1,128 123,291 0 1,536 124

ACRE-FEET -165 249,917 2,237 244,548 0 3,047 246

*COMPUTED INFLOW IS SUM OF CHANGE IN STORAGE, RELEASES, AND EVAPORATION.

(1) EVAPORATION RECORDS TAKEN FROM FOLSOM PAN.

SUMMARY 

Release (ACRE-FEET)

Power 244,548 Folsom South Canal 2,237

Spill 0 Hatchery 3,047

Total = 249,832

Historical Archive and Report Database

Lake Natoma Daily Operations

Run Date: 9/10/2023
#### John Dawidowicz, Appellant, v. Jack Rossi et al., Respondents.

Present — Crosby, P. J., Taylor, Dowling, Harris and MeCurn, JJ.
#### § 73.40 May I satisfy TTB requirements to submit forms to other agencies by submitting those forms electronically?

You may satisfy any requirement in the TTB regulations to submit a form (as that term is defined in § 73.3) to another agency by submitting such form to such agency by electronic means, as long as the agency provides for, and authorizes, the electronic submission of such form and you satisfy any registration or related requirement by that agency for that electronic submission. The submission of a form electronically to another agency does not alter any requirement regarding copies you must maintain.

[79 FR 17034, Mar. 27, 2014, as amended at 79 FR 52199, Sept. 3, 2014]
1

- -



### 5. cUkll,rl.glxt, wlthrilr,fm hrtnlvarwrthr8t@8permmtk,ac tormuprlntedmtst(37pwmathSor **tWh8rrmtiUJ ~b~~ttO0Xt-d**  

### $45 pr x&h ..*..i.....................*.... 

### 3,093.oa 3,w3.00 8. ahlag lwo8

girl*, slxteon, **WithbouaJ am**  

### fortnlm mrltbm, 

### 1oy to 8xcoed

$34 * rnh............. 4,996.oo b,g!#.oo At&her ckrritul8tlc of 

### tb iteu 

### m&r tbr 

### 8lnmapmq 

### lutitutl $JuJu~~ ti o a b f ll i o t br r L o m tl

aaa u nlp m LD i m l f or lit hu

= b o udm . A h íe n m p l u i a l.k w ,7Q r t h t m w ìlî a & Y $ i3 ? 

### 3. wokbq8r,rltbboard,trrl~

. .. ..i.........*................*. plmo $no.oo ll. aoirrr eprxtor, 

### filth m&u. . .. .. . boo.00 400.00_.

### bn~X.R.url&t,~3

### Wrtba ltuixedportlcmdea.llngtithtb,lkua~8choolf'ortbr

D,thepurpamsforuhlch mpmAflcunmntrua ant.horimdurldanti~

### . Bh (3-7-S)
(No. 6631

#### A-1 Ambulance Service, Inc., Claimant, *vs.*State of Illinois, Department of Mental Health, Respondent.

*Opinion filed July 27, 1972.*

A-1 Ambulance Service, Inc., Claimant, pro se.

William J. Scott, Attorney General; Saul R. Wexler, Assistant Attorney General, for Respondent.

Berlin, C.J.
#### § 5.222 Conditions of basic permit.

A basic permit is conditioned upon compliance with the requirements of 27 U.S.C. 205, including the labeling and advertising provisions of this part. A willful violation of the conditions of a basic permit provides grounds for the revocation or suspension of the permit, as applicable, as set forth in part 1 of this chapter.
Exhibit 10.26


 


UNIQUE FABRICATING INCORPORATED

800 Standard Parkway

Auburn Hills, Michigan 48326


 


 





 


January 8, 2015


 


 


 


Taglich Private Equity, LLC

275 Madison Avenue, Suite 1618

New York, NY 10016


 


Gentlemen:


 


1.Reference is
made to the Management Services Agreement, dated as of March 18, 2013, by and between Taglich Private Equity, LLC and UFI
Acquisition, Inc. (now Unique Fabricating, Inc.). Unless otherwise defined herein, all capitalized used herein shall have the meanings
ascribed thereto in the Agreement. The Agreement, among other things, provides, in Section 3(b), for the payment of a Consulting
Fee. In connection with the proposed initial public offering by the Company (the “IPO”), the Company and Service Provider
desire to amend the Agreement to reduce the amount of the Consulting Fee by the amount, if any, of annual cash retainers and equity
awards received as compensation for service on the Company’s board of directors by any director who is a related person,
as defined in Rule 5110 of the FINRA Manual, of Service Provider or Taglich Brothers, Inc.


 


2.Accordingly,
Section 3.2(b) of the Agreement is amended to read in its entirety as follows:


 


“(b)
The Company shall pay Service Provider an annual management fee of Three Hundred Thousand Dollars ($300,000), payable in monthly
installments in advance for services rendered hereunder (the “Consulting Fee”); provided that the Consulting Fee payable
with respect to any year shall be reduced by the following amounts actually received during such year by any director who is a
related person, as defined in Rule 5110 of the rules of the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority, as in effect on the date
of closing of the Company’s initial public offering, of the Service Provider or Taglich Brothers, Inc.: (i) the amount
of any cash retainer and (ii) the value of any equity award, determined, as of the date of such award, in accordance with
the Company’s 2014 Omnibus Performance Award Plan.”


 


3.Except as amended
hereby, the Agreement shall remain in full force and effect.






    	 



    	 



    

 





Taglich Private Equity, LLC


January 8, 2015


Page 2







 


4.This amendment
to the Agreement shall become effective upon the closing of the IPO.


 


If the foregoing correctly
reflects our agreement, please so confirm by executing this letter in the place provided below.


 


Very truly yours,


 


UNIQUE FABRICATING, INC.


 


 


By:     /s/ John Weinhardt        


Name: John
Weinhardt


Title: President


 


 


TAGLICH PRIVATE EQUITY, LLC


 


 


By:     /s/ Richard L. Baum, Jr.        


Name: Richard L. Baum,
Jr.
* Judge of the United States Court of International Trade, sitting by designation.

** Pursuant to 5 TH C IR
. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR
. R. 47.5.4. 1

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 01-31352

ANTONIO BOSLEY, Petitioner - Appellee,

versus BURL CAIN, WARDEN, Louisiana State Penitentiary, Respondent - Appellant, JERRY JONES, District Attorney,
Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Louisiana

(99-CV-827) October 1, 2002
Before GARWOOD and CLEMENT, Circuit Judges, and RESTANI, Judge. *
PER CURIAM: **
We find that the district court erred in its de t erminat io n that Antonio Bosley’s discrimination2

claim was not procedurally barred. The Louisiana Second Circuit Court of Appeal clearly found that Bosle y had procedurally defaulted this claim by failing to file a pre-trial motion to quash his indictment as required under Louisiana law. Because a federal court reviewing a state prisoner’s habeas petition must respect the state co urt ’s determination that a claim is procedurally barred pursuant to state law, Williams v. Cain , 125 F.3d 269, 275 (5th Cir. 1997) (ci ti ng W ainwright v. Sykes , 433 U.S. 72, 90-91 (1977)), the judgment of the district court is REVERSED and the case REMANDED for further proceedings consistent with this opinion.
###### Editorial Note on Part 53

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 53 appear by T.D. ATF-447, 66 FR 19088, Apr. 13, 2001.

#### § 53.20 Delegations of the Administrator.

The regulatory authorities of the Administrator contained in this part are delegated to appropriate TTB officers. These TTB officers are specified in TTB Order 1135.53, Delegation of the Administrator's Authorities in 27 CFR Part 53, Manufacturers Excise Taxes—Firearms and Ammunition. You may obtain a copy of this order by accessing the TTB Web site (*http://www.ttb.gov*) or by mailing a request to the Alcohol and Tobacco Tax and Trade Bureau, National Revenue Center, 550 Main Street, Room 1516, Cincinnati, OH 45202.

[T.D. TTB-44, 71 FR 16957, Apr. 4, 2006]
<PAGE>
                              UNITED BANCORP, INC.
                                    EXHIBITS
                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ENACTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of United Bancorp, Inc. (the "Company")
on Form 10-Q for the period ending June 30, 2004 as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, James W. Everson,
Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as enacted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

      (1)   The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      (2)   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.

/s/ James W. Everson
--------------------------------------------
James W. Everson,
Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer

August 6, 2004
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

DAY ELEV

 222.03

 221.13

 219.77

 219.88

 220.00

 220.93

 220.37

 220.92

 221.17

 221.92

 220.62

 220.72

 221.09

 222.26

 222.85

 222.90

 221.06

 221.24

 220.30

 222.00

 222.86

 223.15

 223.94

 221.68

 222.69

 222.43

 222.91

 221.90

 222.14

 222.84

 48,464

 46,101

 42,557

 42,841

 43,152

 45,577

 44,114

 45,551

 46,206

 48,176

 44,766

 45,027

 45,996

 49,075

 50,646

 50,779

 45,918

 46,390

 43,931

 48,385

 50,673

 51,447

 53,565

 47,546

 50,219

 49,527

 50,806

 48,124

 48,756

 50,619

STORAGE

+1,811

-2,363

-3,544

+284

+311

+2,425

-1,463

+1,437

+655

+1,970

-3,410

+261

+969

+3,079

+1,571

+133

-4,861

+472

-2,459

+4,454

+2,288

+774

+2,118

-6,019

+2,673

-692

+1,279

-2,682

+632

+1,863

CHANGE

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

136

606

708

784

460

0

35

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

218

355

PUMPING

 5,805

 6,672

 6,081

 6,172

 6,494

 6,476

 7,430

 6,898

 6,396

 7,219

 6,194

 6,963

 7,482

 7,009

 6,627

 7,123

 6,887

 6,173

 6,472

 7,439

 6,346

 7,115

 5,931

 7,560

 6,312

 6,311

 6,545

 6,886

 6,031

 6,446

PUMPING

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 284

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

PUMPING

 1,286

 1,110

 975

 1,033

 1,193

 968

 414

 375

 522

 656

 691

 547

 476

 284

 0

 0

 0

 828

 1,997

 1,013

 885

 1,391

 1,399

 1,393

 1,331

 780

 381

 543

 290

 12

GEN.

*

-830

-306

+8

+202

-458

+133

-198

-188

-62

-366

-15

-334

-408

-166

-507

-206

-477

-181

-846

-679

-4

+57

-691

-25

+581

-308

-147

-212

-88

-260

OR

UNITED STATES 

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION

CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT

CONSOLIDATED STATE-FEDERAL O'NEILL FOREBAY July 16, 2001

DAILY OPERATIONS

JUNE 2001 RUN DATE:

IN LAKE GEN.

ACRE-FEET O'NEILL

RELEASE - C.F.S. 

TOTALS +3,966 3,302 22,773 284 199,495 -6,981

ACRE-FEET +3,966 6,550 45,170 563 395,698

SUMMARY

 0

RELEASE (ACRE-FEET)

O'NEILL GEN. 45,170

SAN LUIS PUMP 563 0

 46,653

DOS AMIGOS PUMP 395,698

DELIVERIES 

S. LUIS O'NEILL

 8,834

 6,626

 4,599

 6,251

 7,677

 8,534

 7,305

 8,185

 7,310

 9,234

 5,180

 7,976

 8,855

 8,876

 7,319

 6,688

 4,130

 7,244

 8,076

 11,342

 8,388

 8,839

 9,088

 5,944

 8,409

 7,050

 7,717

 6,289

 6,511

 7,302

 225,778

 447,831

CALIF. DOS AMIGOS

AQUEDUCT

0

270

662

895

625

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

 2,452

 4,864

S. LUIS

DELIV.

GAINS(+)

LOSS(-)

C.F.S.

INFLOW - C.F.S

STATE OF CALIFORNIA

THE RESOURCES AGENCY

DEPARTMENT OF WATER RESOURCES

STATE WATER PROJECT

TOTAL 441,431

-13,847

* DAILY DEL. FIGURES UNAVAILABLE. TOT. DEL. IS INCLUDED IN COMPUTING MONTHLY TOTALS 

Table 18
### §46. Duties of Secretary

The Secretary of the Board of Regents shall take charge of the building and property of the institution, and shall, under their direction, make a fair and accurate record of all their proceedings, to be preserved in the institution until no longer needed in conducting current business; and shall also discharge the duties of librarian and of keeper of the museum, and may, with the consent of the Board of Regents, employ assistants.

(R.S. §5583; Oct. 25, 1951, ch. 562, §2(4), 65 Stat. 639.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

R.S. §5583 derived from act Aug. 10, 1846, ch. 178, §7, 9 Stat. 105.

#### Amendments

1951—Act Oct. 25, 1951, inserted "until no longer needed in conducting current business".
#### Thomas Coy v. Christian Miller.

Filed April 8, 1898.

No. 7985.

TTnauthentieated Bill of Exceptions. A bill of exceptions cannot be considered in the supreme court unless authenticated by the clerk of the district court as part of the record.

Error from the district court of Phelps county. Tried below before Beall, J.

*Affirmed.*

*J. R. Patrick*and *B. F. Smith,*for plaintiff in error.

*Rhea Bros., contra.*

Sullivan, J.

This action was commenced in the district court for Phelps county to recover the title and possession of certain real estate. The plaintiff had a verdict and judgment in his favor and the defendant presents the record to this court for review. The whole controversy between the parties pertains to the location of the divisional line between their adjoining lands; and the errors assigned and argued in the briefs of counsel relate to the sufficiency of the evidence to sustain the verdict. This question we cannot consider for want of a properly authenticated bill of exceptions. The certificate of the clerk of the district court attached to the record before us is as follows: “I, L. O. T-Iuck, clerk of the district court in and for said county and state aforesaid, do hereby certify that the above and foregoing is a true copy of the petition, answer, mandate S. court, stipulation, motion, journal entry, motion and journal entry in the above entitled cause as the same is on file and on record in my office.” Under repeated decisions of this court we are authorized to examine documents purporting to be bills of exceptions only when they are authenticated by the certificate of the clerk as part of the record. *(Union P. R. Co. v. Kinney,*47 Neb. 393; *Wood Mowing & Reaping Machine Co.*
      *500
      *v. Gerhold,*47 Neb. 397; *Childerson v. Childerson,*47 Neb. 162; *Spurck v. Dean,*49 Neb. 66; *Merrill v. Equitable Farm & Stock Improvement Co.,*49 Neb. 198; *Yankton, N. & S. W. R. Co. v. State,*49 Neb. 272; *Wax v. State,*43 Neb. 18; *Sieberling v. Fletcher,*47 Neb. 847; *Scott v. Spencer,*42 Neb. 632; *Romberg v. Fokken,*47 Neb. 198.) In ,the case last cited it is said: “The statute requires both the transcript and the bill of exceptions to be authenticated by the certificate of the clerk of the district court, and we have no right to ignore or disregard its mandatory provisions.” Without the assistance of the bill of exceptions we cannot determine whether the verdict rests on sufficient evidence, and consequently the judgment of the district court must be

Affirmed.
Editorial Note on Part 21
Editorial Notes: Nomenclature changes to part 21 appear by T.D. ATF-435, 66 FR 5475, Jan. 19, 2001. Nomenclature changes to part 21 appear by 81 T.D. TTB-140, 81 FR Aug. 30, 2016.

§ 21.95 Alpha terpineol. ( a ) Boiling point at 752mm 218.8-219.4 °C.
( b ) Density at 15° 0.9386.
( c ) Refractive index at 20° 1.4831.
[T.D. ATF-442, 66 FR 12854, Mar. 1, 2001]
### §2612a. Omitted

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section, Pub. L. 93–380, title IV, §406, Aug. 21, 1974, 88 Stat. 551; Pub. L. 94–273, §2(15), Apr. 21, 1976, 90 Stat. 375; Pub. L. 94–482, title V, §501(a)(6), (7), Oct. 12, 1976, 90 Stat. 2235; Pub. L. 95–207, §13(e), Dec. 13, 1977, 91 Stat. 1472; Pub. L. 95–561, title III, §301(b)(1)(E), (3), Nov. 1, 1978, 92 Stat. 2228; Pub. L. 96–88, title III, §301(a)(1), (b)(1), (2), title V, §507, Oct. 17, 1979, 93 Stat. 677, 678, 692, established an Office of Career Education to carry out the Career Education Incentive Act and a National Advisory Council for Career Education to advise on the implementation of the section and other programs pertaining to development and implementation of career education. The Career Education Incentive Act was repealed by Pub. L. 97–35, and section 413 of Pub. L. 96–88 (20 U.S.C. 3473) authorized the Secretary of Education to consolidate, alter, or discontinue the Office of Career Education or to reallocate any functions vested by statute in the Office. The National Advisory Council for Career Education terminated in 1982.

Section was formerly classified to section 1865 of this title.
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

MEMORANDUM OPINION

No. 04-13-00002-CV

IN THE INTEREST OF J.J., a Child

From the 224th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2011-PA-02163

Honorable Richard Garcia, Judge Presiding

Opinion by: Karen Angelini, Justice

Sitting: Karen Angelini, Justice

Marialyn Barnard, Justice

Patricia O. Alvarez, Justice

Delivered and Filed: May 29, 2013

AFFIRMED

This is an accelerated appeal from an order in a suit brought by the Department of Family 

and Protective Services to terminate appellant’s parental rights. See TEX. FAM. CODE ANN.

§ 263.405 (West Supp. 2012). In its final order, the trial court did not terminate appellant’s 

parental rights, but appointed the maternal grandparents permanent managing conservators of the 

child. Appellant and respondent-mother were named possessory conservators. After appellant 

filed a notice of appeal, appellant’s court-appointed appellate attorney filed a brief containing a 

professional evaluation of the record and demonstrating that there are no arguable grounds to be 

advanced. Counsel concluded that the appeal is frivolous and without merit. The brief meets the 

requirements of Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). See In re R.R., No. 04-03-00096-CV, 

2003 WL 21157944, at *4 (Tex. App.CSan Antonio 2003, order) (applying Anders procedure in 
04-13-00002-CV

- 2 -

appeal from order terminating parental rights), disp. on merits, 2003 WL 22080522 (Tex. App.—

San Antonio 2003, no pet.).

Counsel certified that a copy of his brief was delivered to appellant who was advised of 

his right to examine the record and to file a pro se brief. No pro se brief has been filed. After 

reviewing the record, we agree that the appeal is frivolous and without merit. The order of the 

trial court is affirmed, and counsel’s motion to withdraw is granted.

Karen Angelini, Justice