alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
USGSHomeContactUSGSSearchUSGS

Data Series 674

----

AccessibilityFOIAPrivacyPolicies and Notices

U.S. Department of the Interior |            U.S. Geological Survey                                                URL: http://pubs.usgs.gov/ds/674/html/acronyms.html            Page Contact Information: GS Pubs Web Contact                        Page Last Modified: Tuesday, March 13, 2012, 03:17:25 PM
Exhibits to Petition for Summary Grant of Exemption Pursuant to Section 333 of the 2012 FMRA of 

Water Management Consultants & Testing, Inc.

• DJI Inspire 1 User Manual v1.4 (Exhibit 1)

• DJI Inspire 1 Maintenance Manual v1.0 (Exhibit 2)

• DJI Inspire 1 Safety Guidelines v1.0 (Exhibit 3)

• DJI Phantom 3 User Manual v1.2 (Exhibit 4)

• DJI Phantom 3 Safety Guidelines (Exhibit 5)

• DJI Phantom 2 User Manual v1.4 (Exhibit 6)

• DJI Phantom 2 Vision User Manual v1.8 (Exhibit 7)
### §526. Repealed. Aug. 2, 1956, ch. 887, §4(a)(28), 70 Stat. 948

Section, R.S. §3089, related to costs of prosecution. See section 1613(1) of this title.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

DAY ELEV

 546.74

 547.40

 548.11

 548.76

 549.35

 549.97

 550.84

 551.53

 552.22

 552.95

 553.61

 554.33

 554.60

 554.92

 555.56

 555.58

 555.54

 555.84

 556.16

 556.45

 556.85

 557.25

 558.01

 558.67

 559.35

 559.97

 560.60

 561.57

 562.30

 563.13

 380.0

 382.7

 385.6

 388.3

 390.7

 393.3

 397.0

 399.9

 402.8

 405.9

 408.7

 411.8

 412.9

 414.3

 417.0

 417.1

 417.0

 418.3

 419.6

 420.9

 422.6

 424.4

 427.7

 430.6

 433.6

 436.4

 439.2

 443.5

 446.7

 450.5

STORAGE

+4.2

+2.7

+2.9

+2.7

+2.5

+2.6

+3.6

+2.9

+2.9

+3.1

+2.8

+3.1

+1.2

+1.4

+2.8

+0.1

-0.2

+1.3

+1.4

+1.3

+1.7

+1.7

+3.3

+2.9

+3.0

+2.7

+2.8

+4.3

+3.3

+3.7

CHANGE

3,119

2,405

2,529

2,494

2,475

2,492

2,904

2,507

2,435

2,515

2,349

2,437

1,304

1,388

2,185

1,018

1,136

2,064

2,238

1,928

1,937

1,827

2,731

2,748

2,648

2,398

2,489

3,288

2,844

3,227

INFLOW

 0

 0

 0

 78

 191

 216

 232

 313

 291

 307

 303

 295

 235

 236

 278

 403

 571

 656

 739

 631

 494

 385

 461

 608

 500

 296

 316

 356

 310

 285

MADERA

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

SPILL

 858

 905

 905

 905

 905

 838

 704

 590

 547

 521

 503

 451

 349

 302

 371

 437

 505

 609

 654

 518

 420

 420

 468

 502

 502

 557

 596

 596

 714

 912

FRIANT-KERN

 26

 17

 31

 36

 24

 19

 20

 27

 14

 11

 12

 18

 14

 36

 22

 13

 25

 24

 24

 22

 24

 18

 3

 50

 9

 39

 43

 33

 48

 22

C.F.S.

 .20

 .13

 .23

 .27

 .18

 .14

 .15

 .20

 .10

 .08

 .09

 .13

 .10

 .26

 .16

 .09

 .18

 .17

 .17

 .16

 .17

 .13

 .02

 .35

 .06

 .27

 .30

 .23

 .33

 .15

INCHES

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .58

 .16

 .01

 .00

 .00

 .13

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .01

 .32

 .49

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

PRECIP

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

APRIL 2001 MILLERTON LAKE DAILY OPERATIONS RUN DATE: January 28, 2002

IN LAKE

EVAPORATION

INCHES

C.F.S.

COMPUTED*

1000 ACRE-FEET

RELEASE - C.F.S. 

TOTALS +74.7 70,059 9,986 18,064 0 724 5.20 1.70

ACRE-FEET +74,733 138,962 19,807 35,830 0 1,436

COMMENTS:

* COMPUTED INFLOW IS THE SUM OF CHANGE IN STORAGE, RELEASES, PUMPING AND EVAPORATION.

SUMMARY

RELEASE (ACRE-FEET)

CANALS

FRIANT-KERN

MADERA

 35,830

 19,807 62,795

PRECIPITATION

THIS MONTH =

JULY 1, 2000 TO DATE = 13.32

 375.8

 7,158 1.70

CANALS

AT FRIANT

TOTAL RELEASES

OUTLET

 116

 117

 118

 118

 118

 116

 114

 115

 115

 117

 113

 121

 122

 122

 122

 122

 122

 122

 122

 122

 123

 124

 124

 124

 124

 123

 123

 123

 123

 124

RIVER

 3,609

 7,158

RIVER
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY ELEV

 554.86

 555.62

 556.14

 556.82

 557.43

 557.98

 558.29

 558.55

 558.67

 558.75

 558.81

 558.99

 559.20

 559.54

 560.41

 560.84

 561.06

 561.36

 561.66

 561.94

 562.59

 562.80

 563.02

 563.40

 563.81

 564.01

 564.48

 564.95

 565.21

 565.56

 566.25

 414.0

 417.3

 419.6

 422.5

 425.2

 427.6

 428.9

 430.1

 430.6

 431.0

 431.2

 432.0

 432.9

 434.4

 438.3

 440.2

 441.2

 442.5

 443.9

 445.1

 448.1

 449.0

 450.0

 451.7

 453.6

 454.5

 456.6

 458.7

 459.9

 461.5

 464.7

STORAGE

+3.6

+3.3

+2.2

+3.0

+2.7

+2.4

+1.4

+1.1

+0.5

+0.4

+0.3

+0.8

+0.9

+1.5

+3.9

+1.9

+1.0

+1.3

+1.3

+1.3

+2.9

+0.9

+1.0

+1.7

+1.9

+0.9

+2.1

+2.1

+1.2

+1.6

+3.2

CHANGE

2,203

2,099

1,580

1,897

1,768

1,641

1,107

1,000

701

599

550

820

904

1,207

2,401

1,410

913

1,107

1,109

1,066

1,919

935

944

1,397

1,560

1,107

1,751

1,746

1,271

1,479

2,426

INFLOW

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

MADERA

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

SPILL

 301

 331

 324

 305

 306

 307

 307

 308

 308

 308

 308

 309

 309

 309

 310

 311

 312

 312

 313

 313

 314

 315

 315

 396

 454

 479

 497

 497

 497

 497

 643

FRIANT-KERN

 6

 13

 21

 1

 17

 18

 10

 13

 24

 11

 6

 9

 24

 36

 43

 33

 4

 16

 17

 15

 22

 34

 19

 4

 26

 26

 31

 24

 28

 27

 39

C.F.S.

 .04

 .09

 .15

 .01

 .12

 .13

 .07

 .09

 .17

 .08

 .04

 .06

 .17

 .25

 .30

 .23

 .03

 .11

 .12

 .10

 .15

 .23

 .13

 .03

 .18

 .18

 .21

 .16

 .19

 .18

 .26

INCHES

 .00

 .00

 .10

 .06

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .45

 .27

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

PRECIP

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

MARCH 2003 MILLERTON LAKE DAILY OPERATIONS RUN DATE: March 12, 2004

IN LAKE

EVAPORATION

INCHES

C.F.S.

COMPUTED*

1000 ACRE-FEET

RELEASE - C.F.S. 

TOTALS +54.2 42,617 0 11,115 0 617 4.26 .88

ACRE-FEET +54,240 84,531 0 22,047 0 1,224

COMMENTS:

* COMPUTED INFLOW IS THE SUM OF CHANGE IN STORAGE, RELEASES, PUMPING AND EVAPORATION.

SUMMARY

RELEASE (ACRE-FEET)

CANALS

FRIANT-KERN

MADERA

 22,047

 0 29,069

PRECIPITATION

THIS MONTH =

JULY 1, 2002 TO DATE = 8.31

 410.5

 7,022 0.88

CANALS

AT FRIANT

TOTAL RELEASES

OUTLET

 101

 102

 102

 102

 103

 103

 103

 103

 103

 103

 103

 103

 103

 103

 103

 103

 103

 103

 103

 107

 110

 110

 110

 130

 145

 145

 145

 146

 146

 147

 147

RIVER

 3,540

 7,022

RIVER
### SUBCHAPTER II—CONSOLIDATION OF FEDERAL PROGRAMS FOR ELEMENTARY AND SECONDARY EDUCATION
<PAGE>   1
                                                                    Exhibit 23.2

                        CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS


We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration Statement
No. 33-63005 on Form S-3 of National Bancshares Corporation of our report dated
January 29, 1999 on the consolidated balance sheets of National Bancshares
Corporation as of December 31, 1998 and the related consolidated statements of
income, shareholders' equity and cash flows for the year then ended; which
report is incorporated by reference into this Annual Report on Form 10-K.


                                           /S/CROWE, CHIZEK AND COMPANY LLP
                                           Crowe, Chizek and Company LLP

Columbus, Ohio
March 25, 1999
#### In the Matter of the Probate of the Will of Clarence H. Brown, Deceased. Edward A. Brown et al., Appellants; Guy Sherman, Respondent.

Order affirmed, without costs of this appeal to any party. All concur, except Larkin and Love, JJ., who dissent and vote for reversal and reinstatement of the verdict. (The order sets aside the verdict of a jury and grants a new trial, in a proceeding for the probate of a will.) Present — Taylor, P. J., Harris, MeCurn, Larkin and Love, JJ.
<PAGE>   1
                                                                    EXHIBIT 10.7

                                     TEKELEC
                            SCHEDULE OF DISTRIBUTORS
                        SUBJECT TO STANDARD INTERNATIONAL
                             DISTRIBUTION AGREEMENT


<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
       DISTRIBUTOR                                      TERRITORY

<S>                                                     <C>
       Altech Instruments Pty, Ltd.                     South Africa
       Bynet                                            Israel
       Eagle Telecom                                    Puerto Rico
       Euro Tech Far East, Ltd.                         Hong Kong
       Grupo Ingedigit                                  Venezuela
       Heli-Ocean Technology                            Taiwan
       Industrial Electro-Communications, Inc.          Philippines
       KDC Corporation                                  South Korea
       Lagercrantz Communication                        Sweden
       Medcom, S.A. de C.V.                             Mexico
       MIBO Integra                                     Slovenia
       Nichecom                                         New Zealand
       Oy Alkas AB                                      Finland, Baltics
       Reycom Electronica SRL                           Argentina
       Sintel                                           Norway, Denmark
       ST Computer Systems                              Singapore
       Tekelec Australia, Pty. Ltd.                     Australia
       Tekelec China                                    China
       Tekelec Espana, SA                               Spain and Portugal
       Tekelec Airtronic SPA                            Italy
       Tekelec Airtronic B.V.                           The Netherlands,Luxembourg,Belgium
       Tekelec Airtronic GMBH                           Germany
       Tekelec-Airtronic, S.A.                          France
       Twintech Design Co. Ltd.                         Thailand
</TABLE>
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 07-1505

MARK DAVIS, M.D., Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus HARRY KNIPP, M.D., Chairman of the Maryland Board of Physicians, in his official and individual capacity; CAROL SAMUELS-BOTTS, M.D., Vice Chairman of the Maryland Board of Physicians, in her official and individual capacity; PAUL T. ELDER, M.D., Secretary/Treasurer of the Maryland Board of Physicians, in his official and individual capacity; EVELYN T. BEASLEY; HABIB BHUTTA; CARMEN M. CONTEE; RAMSAY FARAH; PAUL R. FLEURY; MOISES Z. FRAIMAN; KEVIN B. GEROLD; CHARLES GREENHOUSE; ROBERT G. HENNESSY; SAMUEL K. HIMMELRICH, SR.; RAY RUFF; NALLAN C. RAMAKRISHNA, M.D.; THERESA C. ROHRS, P.A.-C; HAROLD A. ROSE; GENE STEVENS; SUSAN T. STRAHAN, M.D.; GEORGE WILLIAMS, M.D.; DOUGLAS WRIGHT, M.D., Members of the of the Maryland Board of Physicians, in their official and individual capacities; C. IRVING PINDER, JR., Executive Director of the Maryland Board of Physicians, in his official and individual capacity; DELMARVA FOUNDATION; ADELE WILZACK, Chairman of the Board of Delmarva Foundation, in her official and individual capacity, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. J. Frederick Motz, District Judge. (1:07- cv-00388-JFM)- 2 - Submitted: August 30, 2007 Decided: September 5, 2007 Before MICHAEL, KING, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Mark Davis, Appellant Pro Se. Thomas Walton Keech, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF MARYLAND, Baltimore, Maryland; Thomas T. Alspach, Easton, Maryland, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.- 3 - PER CURIAM: Mark Davis, M.D., appeals the district court’s order denying his motion for default judgment and dismissing his civil action in regard to a peer review process against all defendants. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. SeeDavis v. Knipp , No. 1:07-cv-00388-JFM (D. Md. filed May 1, 2007; entered May 2, 2007). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
**Exhibit 32(a)**

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 906**

**OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 (18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350)**

 

In connection with theQuarterly Report of PACCAR Financial Corp. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Qfor the quarter ended September 30, 2008 as filed with the Securities andExchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), the undersigned certify,  pursuant to section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. section 1350), that to the best of our knowledge and belief:

 

(1)          TheReport fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) ofthe Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2)          Theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 
| Date   | October 27, 2008 |                          | By | /s/ Mark C. Pigott |
|--------|-----------------------|-------------------------------|----|--------------------|
|   |                  | Mark C. Pigott                |
|   |                  | Chairman                      |
|   |                  | PACCAR Financial Corp.        |
|   |                  | (Principal Executive Officer) |
|   |                  |                          |
|   |                  |                          |
|   | By                    | /s/ Michael A. Tembreull      |
|   |                  | Michael A. Tembreull          |
|   |                  | Vice Chairman                 |
|   |                  | PACCAR Financial Corp.        |
|   |                  | (Principal Financial Officer) |

 

A signed original of thiswritten statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Companyand will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities andExchange Commission or its staff upon request.

 

----
###### Editorial Note on Part 45

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 45 appear by T.D. ATF-460, 66 FR 39093, July 27, 2001.

#### § 45.24 Interference with administration.

Whoever, corruptly or by force or threats of force, endeavors to hinder or obstruct the administration of this part, or endeavors to intimidate or impede any appropriate TTB officer acting in his official capacity, or forcibly rescues or attempts to rescue or causes to be rescued any property, after it has been duly seized for forfeiture to the United States in connection with a violation of the internal revenue laws, shall be liable to the penalties prescribed by law.

(68A Stat. 855; 26 U.S.C. 7212)

[27 FR 4476, May 10, 1962. Redesignated at 40 FR 16835, Apr. 15, 1975, as amended by T.D. ATF-472, 67 FR 8880, Feb. 27, 2002]
§ 6.98 Advertising service. The listing of the names and addresses of two or more unaffiliated retailers selling the products of an industry member in an advertisement of that industry member does not constitute a means to induce within the meaning of section 105(b)(3) of the Act, provided: ( a ) The advertisement does not also contain the retail price of the product (except where the exclusive retailer in the jurisdiction is a State or a political subdivision of a State), and
( b ) The listing is the only reference to the retailers in the advertisement and is relatively inconspicuous in relation to the advertisement as a whole, and
( c ) The advertisement does not refer only to one retailer or only to retail establishments controlled directly or indirectly by the same retailer, except where the retailer is an agency of a State or a political subdivision of a State.
[T.D. ATF-364, 60 FR 20423, Apr. 26, 1995]
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY ELEV

 123.74

 122.88

 123.76

 124.07

 123.55

 123.54

 123.43

 123.39

 123.43

 123.45

 123.59

 123.85

 123.79

 123.95

 123.52

 122.25

 123.12

 123.04

 122.99

 123.44

 122.89

 121.61

 121.03

 122.63

 122.33

 122.12

 122.35

 121.63

 120.85

 121.54

 124.10

 8,139

 7,737

 8,148

 8,296

 8,050

 8,045

 7,993

 7,974

 7,993

 8,003

 8,068

 8,191

 8,162

 8,238

 8,035

 7,454

 7,847

 7,810

 7,787

 7,998

 7,742

 7,177

 6,934

 7,625

 7,490

 7,395

 7,499

 7,186

 6,861

 7,148

 8,311

STORAGE

+254

-402

+411

+148

-246

-5

-52

-19

+19

+10

+65

+123

-29

+76

-203

-581

+393

-37

-23

+211

-256

-565

-243

+691

-135

-95

+104

-313

-325

+287

+1,163

CHANGE

3,045

2,233

2,155

1,844

1,623

1,758

1,740

1,745

1,793

1,779

1,750

1,861

1,778

1,801

1,638

1,407

1,878

1,618

1,520

1,867

4,886

6,992

7,191

8,431

9,647

9,696

9,823

9,504

9,574

9,383

8,827

INFLOW

 10

 975

 1,903

 1,723

 1,701

 1,707

 1,704

 1,691

 1,715

 1,706

 1,652

 1,731

 1,726

 1,711

 1,695

 1,649

 1,634

 1,591

 1,486

 1,716

 1,880

 2,016

 3,982

 4,424

 4,701

 4,752

 4,752

 4,763

 4,878

 5,002

 4,956

POWER

 2,862

 1,416

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 3,090

 5,216

 3,286

 3,614

 4,968

 4,944

 4,972

 4,852

 4,813

 4,189

 3,238

SPILL

 45

 45

 45

 45

 45

 45

 45

 45

 45

 45

 43

 45

 45

 45

 45

 45

 45

 45

 45

 45

 45

 45

 45

 45

 45

 45

 45

 45

 45

 45

 45

HATCHERY

 0

 0

 0

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 0

 0

 0

 6

 1

 1

 1

 0

 0

 0

 1

 0

 1

 3

 2

 2

 2

 2

 2

C.F.S.

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

MARCH 2018 LAKE NATOMA DAILY OPERATIONS RUN DATE: April 1, 2018

IN LAKE

EVAP

C.F.S.

COMPUTED*

ACRE-FEET

RELEASE - C.F.S.

TOTALS +426 130,787 77,532 51,460 1,393 33

ACRE-FEET +426 259,416 153,785 102,071 2,763 65

COMMENTS:

* COMPUTED INFLOW IS THE SUM OF CHANGE IN STORAGE, RELEASES AND EVAPORATION.

SUMMARY

RELEASES (ACRE-FEET)

POWER 153,785

SPILL 102,071

FOLSOM SOUTH CANAL

HATCHERY

 313

 2,763

 7,885

FOLSOM

SOUTH 

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 8

 16

 18

 22

 22

 21

 22

 22

 7

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 158

 313

(1)

(1) INCHES OF EVAPORATION TAKEN FROM FOLSOM PAN.

RELEASES (ACRE-FEET) 

TOTAL 258,932
IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON

DIVISION II

STATE OF WASHINGTON, No. 52318-3-II 

Respondent,

v. UNPUBLISHED OPINION

DESARAE LYN RUSSELL,

Appellant.

Desarae Russell appeals the imposition of interest on her legal financial obligations

(LFOs). The State concedes that the imposition of interest on LFOs here violates RCW 

10.82.090(1). We accept the State’s concession, and we remand for the trial court to strike the 

provision in the judgment and sentence imposing interest on LFOs and to strike any accrued

interest.

FACTS

On February 5, 2018, an officer discovered heroin when searching Russell incident to an 

arrest. Russell was convicted on May 15 of possession of a controlled substance, heroin.

Russell was sentenced on August 17. The trial court imposed the following LFOs: a 

$500 crime victim penalty assessment, a $100 crime lab fee, and a $100 DNA collection fee. 

The judgment and sentence provided that the LFOs would bear interest “from the date of the 

judgment until payment in full.” Clerk’s Papers at 20.

Russell appeals the imposition of interest on her LFOs.

Filed

Washington State

Court of Appeals

Division Two

July 23, 2019
No. 52318-3-II

2

ANALYSIS

Russell claims, and the State concedes, that the trial court erred by imposing interest on 

her LFOs. We agree.

RCW 10.82.090(1) states, “As of June 7, 2018, no interest shall accrue on nonrestitution 

legal financial obligations.” Here, the trial court imposed nonrestitution LFOs. And the 

judgment and sentence was entered after June 7, 2018. Therefore, the trial court erred in 

imposing interest on those LFOs.

CONCLUSION

We remand for the trial court to strike the provision in the judgment and sentence 

imposing interest on LFOs and to strike any accrued interest.

A majority of the panel having determined that this opinion will not be printed in the 

Washington Appellate Reports, but will be filed for public record in accordance with RCW 

2.06.040, it is so ordered.

MAXA, C.J.

We concur:

WORSWICK, J.

SUTTON, J.
#### § 303.125 State interagency coordinating council.

Each system must include a State Interagency Coordinating Council (Council) that meets the requirements of subpart G of this part.

(Approved by Office of Management and Budget under control number 1820-0550)

(Authority: 20 U.S.C. 1435(a)(15))
#### Clara L. Bachelor et al. v. Henry Schlautman.

Filed February 23, 1899.

No. 8759.

Guardian and Ward. On the authority of *Bachelor v. Korb,*58 Neb. 133, the judgment of the district court in this case is reversed.

Error from the district court of Cuming' county. Tried below before Norris, J.

*Reversed.*

*T. J. Mahoney*and *G. J. Smyth,*for plaintiffs in error.

*M. McLaughlin*and *J. O. Oratoford, contra.*

Ragan, C.

The facts in this case are the same as in *Bachelor v. Korb,*58 Neb. 122, and upon the authority of the latter case the judgment of the district court in this is reversed and the cause remanded with the same directions as in that case.

Reversed and. remanded.