alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### Seymour Schoenfeld, an Infant, by Anna Schoenfeld, His Guardian ad Litem, et al., Plaintiffs, v. Four Leaf Clover Realty Corp., Defendant *825and Third Party Plaintiff-Appellant. Waldbaum, Inc., Third Party Defendant-Respondent.

The infant plaintiff was injured while ascending from the basement on the premises of defendant Four Leaf Clover Realty Corp., as a result of cellar doors closing and striking his head before he reached the sidewalk. A companion action was brought by the mother for loss of services. Defendant owner Four Leaf Clover Realty Corp., pursuant to section 193-a of the Civil Practice Act, served a third party complaint upon defendant Waldbaum, Inc., the lessee, alleging that the accident was due to the primary and active negligence of the third party defendant, while the negligence of the third party plaintiff was secondary and passive. The third party defendant thereupon moved to dismiss the complaint on the ground that it did not state facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action, pursuant to subdivision 5 of rule 106 of the Rules of Civil Practice. The motion was granted. Defendant Four Leaf Clover Realty Corp. appeals. Order and judgment reversed on the law, with $10 costs and disbursements to appellant, and the motion denied, with $10 costs. The cross complaint alleges control in the impleaded party defendant. Therefore, as a matter of pleading, it sets forth facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action and may not be dismissed on motion. Carswell, Acting P. J., Johnston, Adel, Sneed and Wenzel, JJ., concur. [See *post,*p. 868.]
(No. 74-CC-478

#### Air Illinois, Inc., Claimant, *vs.*State of Illinois, Department of Corrections, Respondent.

*Opinion filed April 11, 1974.*

Air Illinois, Inc., Claimant, pro se.

William J. Scott, Attorney General; William E. Webber, Assistant Attorney General, for Respondent.

Per Curiam.
Editorial Note on Part 70
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 70 appear by T.D. ATF-450, 66 FR 29022-29030, May 29, 2001.

§ 70.187 Records of sale. ( a ) *Requirement.* Each appropriate TTB officer shall make a record of all sales under 26 U.S.C. 6335 of real property situated within his or her jurisdiction and of redemptions of such property. The records shall set forth the tax for which any such sale was made, the dates of seizures and sale, the name of the party assessed and all proceedings in making such sale, the amount of expenses, the names of the purchasers, and the date of the deed. In the case of redemption of the property, the records shall additionally set forth the date of such redemption and of the transfer of the certificate of sale, the amount of the redemption price, and the name of the party to whom such redemption price was paid. The orginal record shall be retained by the appropriate TTB officer.
( b ) *Copy as evidence.* A copy of such record, or any part thereof, certified by the appropriate TTB officer shall be evidence in any court of the truth of the facts therein stated.
(26 U.S.C. 6340)
[T.D. ATF-301, 55 FR 47627, Nov. 14, 1990, as amended by T.D. ATF-450, 66 FR 29027, May 29, 2001]
```

[Congressional Bills 116th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 5490 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

116th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 5490

 To amend section 1105(a) of title 31, United States Code, to require 
that annual budget submissions of the President to Congress provide an 
  estimate of the cost per taxpayer of the deficit and of the public 
                                 debt.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           December 19, 2019

 Mr. Stewart introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                        Committee on the Budget

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To amend section 1105(a) of title 31, United States Code, to require 
that annual budget submissions of the President to Congress provide an 
  estimate of the cost per taxpayer of the deficit and of the public 
                                 debt.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. REQUIREMENT IN BUDGET SUBMISSION WITH RESPECT TO THE COST 
              PER TAXPAYER OF THE DEFICIT.

    Section 1105(a) of title 31, United States Code, is amended by 
adding at the end the following:
            ``(40)(A) in the case of a fiscal year in which the budget 
        is projected to result in a deficit, an estimate of the pro 
        rata cost of such deficit for taxpayers who will file 
        individual income tax returns for taxable years ending during 
        such fiscal year; and
            ``(B) in the case of any fiscal year, an estimate of the 
        pro rata cost of the public debt for taxpayers who will file 
        individual income tax returns for taxable years ending during 
        such fiscal year.''.
                                 <all>
```
#### § 31.64 Apothecaries or druggists selling medicines and tinctures.

Apothecaries and druggists who use wines or spirituous liquors for compounding medicines and in making tinctures that are unfit for use for beverage purposes are not considered to be dealers by reason of the sale of those compounds or tinctures for nonbeverage purposes.

(26 U.S.C. 5002)
Editorial Note on Part 25
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 25 appear by T.D. ATF-437, 66 FR 5478, 5479, Jan. 19, 2001.

§ 25.68 Description of brewery. ( a ) The Brewer's Notice, Form 5130.10, will include a description of ( 1 ) each tract of land comprising the brewery, and
( 2 ) a listing of each brewery building by its designated letter or number, giving the approximate ground dimensions and the purpose for which ordinarily used.
( b ) The description of the land will be in sufficient detail to enable appropriate TTB officers to determine the boundaries of the brewery.
(Sec. 201, Pub. L. 85-859, 72 Stat. 1388, as amended (26 U.S.C. 5401))
**Exhibit 23.1**

 

**Consent of Williams & Webster, P.S., Independent RegisteredPublic Accounting Firm**

 

Weconsent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement (Form S-8Number 333-104308) pertaining to the PhotoWorks, Inc. 1999 Stock IncentiveCompensation Plan, as amended, the Registration Statement (Form S-8 Number333-61048) pertaining to the PhotoWorks, Inc. 1999 Stock IncentiveCompensation Plan, as amended and the PhotoWorks, Inc. IndividualNonqualified Option Agreements, the Registration Statement (Form S-8Number 333-37698) pertaining to PhotoWorks, Inc. 1999 Stock IncentiveCompensation Plan, the Registration Statement (Form S-8 Number 333-95277)pertaining to the PhotoWorks, Inc. 1999 Employee Stock Option Plan, theRegistration Statement (Form S-8 Number 33-24107) pertaining to thePhotoWorks, Inc. Incentive Stock Option Plan, the Registration Statement (Form S-8Number 33-36020) pertaining to the PhotoWorks, Inc. 1987 Stock OptionPlan, the Registration Statement (Form S-8 Number 33-69530) pertaining tothe PhotoWorks, Inc. 1993 Employee Stock Purchase Plan, and theRegistration Statement (Form S-8 Number 333-132758) pertaining to optionsgranted to Philippe Sanchez, of our report dated December 29, 2006, withrespect to the consolidated financial statements and schedule of PhotoWorks, Inc.included in the Annual Report (Form 10-KSB) for the year ended September 30,2006.

 

 
| /s/  Williams & Webster, P.S. |
|----------------------------------------|

 

 

Seattle,Washington

December 21,2007

 

----
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

DAY

 58,585

 58,927

 59,735

 60,271

 61,003

 61,244

 61,128

 61,115

 60,907

 60,077

 59,344

 59,050

 59,001

 59,152

 59,406

 59,348

 59,307

 59,645

 60,320

 60,995

 61,476

 61,909

 62,430

 62,685

 62,442

 62,396

 62,647

 62,969

 62,977

 62,919

 77,103

 79,401

 80,828

 82,125

 83,384

 84,609

 86,047

 86,313

 86,177

 85,385

 84,582

 82,865

 82,467

 82,878

 84,107

 85,923

 87,308

 88,680

 90,020

 91,249

 92,485

 93,876

 94,911

 95,573

 95,966

 96,251

 96,552

 96,853

 97,025

 97,255

STORAGE - A.F. 

 135,688

 138,328

 140,563

 142,396

 144,387

 145,853

 147,175

 147,428

 147,084

 145,462

 143,926

 141,915

 141,468

 142,030

 143,513

 145,271

 146,615

 148,325

 150,340

 152,244

 153,961

 155,785

 157,341

 158,258

 158,408

 158,647

 159,199

 159,822

 160,002

 160,174

2,486

2,863

3,857

5,019

6,169

6,923

7,269

7,251

6,809

6,324

5,361

4,668

4,257

3,730

3,283

3,500

3,296

2,427

2,395

2,176

2,414

1,876

1,961

2,252

3,175

3,206

3,446

3,482

2,809

3,150

3,624

4,194

4,984

5,943

7,173

7,662

7,935

7,379

6,636

5,506

4,587

3,654

4,032

4,013

4,031

4,386

3,974

3,289

3,411

3,136

3,280

2,796

2,745

2,714

3,251

3,326

3,724

3,796

2,900

3,237

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

JUNE 2010 FULL NATURAL FLOW AT NEW MELONES DAM RUN DATE: 07/01/2010

TOTALS +26,743 131,318

* October 1, 260,469

 638.5

 646.9

 656.8

 668.5

 682.8

 698.0

 713.7

 728.3

 741.5

 752.4

 761.5

 768.8

 776.8

 784.7

 792.7

 801.4

 809.3

 815.8

 822.6

 828.8

 835.3

 840.9

 846.3

 851.7

 858.1

 864.7

 872.1

 879.7

 885.4

 891.8

DONNELLS

RES

BEARDSLEY

RES

2009 TO DATE

NEW

MELONES

INFLOW

C.F.S

NATURAL

RIVER

C.F.S

ACCUM *

FULL

NATURAL

1000 A.F.

RESERVOIR

TOTAL

+2,257

+2,640

+2,235

+1,833

+1,991

+1,466

+1,322

+253

-344

-1,622

-1,536

-2,011

-447

+562

+1,483

+1,758

+1,344

+1,710

+2,015

+1,904

+1,717

+1,824

+1,556

+917

+150

+239

+552

+623

+180

+172

CHANGE

A.F. C.F.S.

+1,138

+1,331

+1,127

+924

+1,004

+739

+666

+128

-173

-818

-774

-1,014

-225

+283

+748

+886

+678

+862

+1,016

+960

+866

+920

+784

+462

+76

+120

+278

+314

+91

+87
#### § 9.0 Scope.

The regulations in this part relate to American viticultural areas created under the authority of the Federal Alcohol Administration Act and referred to in § 4.25(e) of this chapter.

[T.D. TTB-90, 76 FR 3500, Jan. 20, 2011]
i i i i i i

MEMORANDUM OPINION

No. 04-09-00485-CR

Jose A. CORDOVA,

Appellant

v.

The STATE of Texas,

Appellee

From the 187th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2005-CR-5739

Honorable Raymond Angelini, Judge Presiding

PER CURIAM

Sitting: Phylis J. Speedlin, Justice

Rebecca Simmons, Justice

Steven C. Hilbig, Justice

Delivered and Filed: September 23, 2009

DISMISSED FOR WANT OF JURISDICTION

The trial court imposed sentence on February 5, 2007. Because appellant did not file a

motion for new trial, the notice of appeal was due to be filed on March 7, 2007. TEX. R. APP. P.

26.2(a)(1). A motion for extension of time to file the notice of appeal was due on March 22, 2007.

TEX.R. APP. P. 26.3. Appellant did not file his notice of appeal until May 4, 2009; appellant did not

file a motion for extension of time. This court issued an order on August 18, 2009 directing
04-09-00485-CR

-2-

appellant to show cause why this appeal should not be dismissed for lack of jurisdiction. On

September 3, 2009, appellant filed a written response asserting that his double jeopardy rights were

violated in this case and asking this court to extend the time for filing his notice of appeal.

A late notice of appeal invokes the appellate court’s jurisdiction in a criminal case only if

(1) it is filed within fifteen days of the last day allowed for filing the notice of appeal, (2) a motion

for extension of time is filed in the court of appeals within the fifteen-day grace period, and (3) the

court of appeals grants the motion for extension of time. Olivo v. State, 918 S.W.2d 519, 522 (Tex.

Crim. App. 1996). This court may not extend the time to file a notice of appeal unless a motion for

extension of time is filed in the appellate court within fifteen (15) days after the deadline for filing

the notice of appeal. See TEX. R. APP. P. 26.3. As noted, appellant did not file a motion for

extension within the fifteen-day grace period. When a notice of appeal and a motion for extension

of time are not filed within the fifteen-day grace period, the appellate court lacks jurisdiction. TEX.

R.APP. P. 26.3; Olivo v. State, 918 S.W.2d 519, 522 (Tex. Crim. App. 1996). But see Ater v. Eighth

Court of Appeals, 802 S.W.2d 241, 243 (Tex. Crim. App. 1991) (an out-of-time appeal from a final

felony conviction may be sought by filing a writ of habeas corpus in the trial court pursuant to article

11.07 of the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure). Accordingly, this appeal is dismissed for lack of

jurisdiction.

PER CURIAM

DO NOT PUBLISH
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY HIGH

 242

 246

 247

 249

 251

 256

 259

 269

 268

 264

 261

 263

 267

 270

 268

 270

 271

 269

 270

 275

 270

 268

 268

 264

 270

 266

 263

 265

 264

 265

 263

 235

 236

 240

 238

 231

 235

 238

 241

 246

 251

 251

 254

 255

 255

 264

 260

 261

 264

 260

 255

 257

 260

 255

 251

 255

 257

 252

 254

 245

 249

 247

 238

 240

 243

 244

 243

 247

 249

 253

 257

 258

 257

 257

 260

 262

 266

 266

 266

 267

 266

 264

 265

 264

 264

 260

 262

 262

 258

 261

 259

 259

 257

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

MAY 2016 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: June 10, 2016

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

FARRAR PARK AT DUTCH SLOUGH
### §74a. Permanent loan of funds by Board of Trustees to Treasury; semiannual interest payments to Board

The Secretary of the Treasury is authorized and directed to receive into the Treasury from time to time as a permanent loan by the Board of Trustees of the National Gallery of Art to the United States sums in cash of not to exceed $5,000,000 in the aggregate, and to pay interest on the principal amount of such loan at a rate which is the higher of the rate of 4 per centum per annum or a rate which is .25 percentage points less than a rate determined by the Secretary of the Treasury, taking into consideration the current average market yield on outstanding long-term marketable obligations of the United States, adjusted to the nearest one-eighth of 1 per centum, payable semiannually. Such interest is permanently appropriated for payment to the Board of Trustees of the National Gallery of Art.

(Apr. 10, 1943, ch. 46, 57 Stat. 62; Pub. L. 94–418, Sept. 21, 1976, 90 Stat. 1278.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section was not enacted as part of act Mar. 24, 1937, ch. 50, 50 Stat. 51, which comprises this subchapter.

#### Amendments

1976—Pub. L. 94–418 inserted provision authorizing alternate interest rate to existing interest rate of 4 per centum per annum.
EXHIBIT 31.1
 CCFNB BANCORP, INC.
 CEO CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
SECTION 302 OF THE  SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
  1.
    
    I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of CCFNB Bancorp, Inc. for the
quarterly period ended September 30, 2009;2.
    
    Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a
material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in
light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with
respect to the quarterly period covered by this amended report.3.
    
    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information
included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition,
results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods
presented in this amended report;4.
    
    The registrants other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing and
maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e)
and 15d  15 (e) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange
Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and have:
     5.
    
    The registrants other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most
recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants
auditors and the audit committee of the registrants board of directors (or persons
performing the equivalent functions):
 (a)
    
    All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of
internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect
the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information;
and(b)
    
    Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who
have a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial reporting.
  /s/ Lance O. DiehlLance O. DiehlChief Executive Officer
**OFFICE OF**  **THE ATTORNEY**  **GENERAL OF**  **TEXAS AUSTIN** Hon. BaeoomClle8,Page 2 In view of the pendingLitigation we do not beliavsit proper or aiMrob for us'to renderan **opinion at**  **thie4 time.**  Aa 0006 as the above litigation h40 been deoidsd we **aill** truni8h **you** with ui **O~~Oll** whioh will of ooureo oonform to the deoi~ion

of tha A~~sl.bte CO\urt. TIEUS
###### Editorial Note on Part 20

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 20 appear by T.D. ATF-235, 66 FR 5473, Jan. 19, 2001, and T.D. ATF-463 and T.D. ATF-462, 66 FR 42733, 42736, Aug. 15, 2001.

#### § 20.244 Receipt of shipment.

On receipt of a shipment of specially denatured spirits, a representative of the Government agency shall inspect the shipment for any loss or deficiency. In the case of loss or deficiency, the agency shall annotate the receiving document and forward a copy to the appropriate TTB officer from which the shipment was consigned.
EXHIBIT 32-2


                CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                      AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF
                         THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In  connection  with the  Annual  Report on Form 20-F of  Mirtronics  Inc.  (the
"Company")  for the year ended  September 30, 2002 as filed with the  Securities
and Exchange  Commission  on the date hereof (the  "Report"),  Stan  Abramowitz,
Chief Financial Officer of the Company,  certify,  pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section
1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that
to the best of my knowledge:

1.   The Report fully complies with the  requirements  of section 13(a) or 15(d)
     of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2.   The information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in all material
     respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Date: December 11, 2003
By: /s/ STAN ABRAMOWITZ
Stan Abramowitz, Chief Financial Officer
MIRTRONICS INC.
p.1 

OAR Box 1194 

Prepped by Candice Davis 

Document Number: 

53) ll-F-3 

Docket Number: 

A-90-15 

Printed 5/13/2008 10:52:15 AM Sheet 53 of 89 
RZ. 

© 

A~?o-/r 

/1-90-15* 

IT-F-3 

US Department 

of Transportation 

National Highway 

Traffic Safety 

Administration 

AUG 1 5 1990 

400 Seventh Street. S W 

Washington. DC 20590 

Mr. Richard D. Wilson. Director 

Office of Mobile Sources 

U.S. Environmental Protection Agency 

Washington. DC 20460 

Dear Mr. Wilson: 

We have reviewed the material you sent us on Lubrizol's copperbased diesel fuel additive for an emission control system. Our 

comments are similar to the review we did for you on Volkswagen's 

(VW) iron-based diesel fuel additive for an emission control 

system. Please refer to our June 1, 1990, letter to you on the 

VW fuel additive. 

More specifically, the material we reviewed indicates that the 

performance and effect of Lubrizol*s copper-based diesel fuel 

additive in an emission control system on a vehicle would not add 

any fire hazard to the vehicle during a crash. It also indicates 

that the additive would reduce the "exhaust back pressure", 

thereby reducing the possibility of engine stalling. This would 

be a positive safety factor. In addition, the material indicates 

that the additive would reduce temperature or thermal stress in 

the particle control system, which would reduce the possibility 

of rupturing the system during a vehicle crash. 

We have no opinion about the health effect on human exposure to 

the liquid additive when the system is ruptured due to a crash or 

when the system is dismantled from the vehicle. As we suggested 

in our letter to you or the VT*? fuel additive, you may want to 

perform a risk analysis on this proposal as related to a crash 

situation. 

We hope our comments are helpful to you. 

Sincerely, 

Barry Felrice' 

Associate Administrator 

for Rulemaking 

SAFETY BELTS SAVE LIVES 

AUTO SAFETY HOTLINE 

(800)424-9393 

Wash. D.C Area 366-0123
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY ELEV

 123.85

 124.81

 123.30

 123.36

 123.22

 122.06

 122.19

 121.68

 122.78

 122.99

 124.07

 124.47

 124.09

 123.47

 123.04

 121.77

 120.80

 122.25

 122.39

 121.61

 121.43

 122.42

 121.89

 122.09

 122.34

 121.65

 123.14

 124.30

 123.65

 123.05

 123.20

 8,191

 8,666

 7,932

 7,960

 7,894

 7,368

 7,427

 7,207

 7,692

 7,787

 8,296

 8,496

 8,306

 8,012

 7,810

 7,244

 6,841

 7,454

 7,517

 7,177

 7,102

 7,530

 7,295

 7,382

 7,494

 7,194

 7,857

 8,411

 8,097

 7,815

 7,885

STORAGE

+245

+475

-734

+28

-66

-526

+59

-220

+485

+95

+509

+200

-190

-294

-202

-566

-403

+613

+63

-340

-75

+428

-235

+87

+112

-300

+663

+554

-314

-282

+70

CHANGE

1,688

1,794

1,178

1,616

1,542

1,283

1,611

1,456

1,788

1,589

1,829

1,686

1,474

1,401

1,432

1,247

1,318

1,823

1,560

1,337

1,501

1,770

1,441

1,594

1,603

1,393

1,858

1,781

1,374

1,365

1,546

INFLOW

 1,481

 1,475

 1,463

 1,511

 1,482

 1,452

 1,489

 1,481

 1,458

 1,455

 1,486

 1,500

 1,485

 1,472

 1,462

 1,459

 1,448

 1,442

 1,456

 1,425

 1,444

 1,454

 1,459

 1,456

 1,457

 1,454

 1,434

 1,422

 1,439

 1,437

 1,439

POWER

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

SPILL

 60

 60

 60

 60

 60

 60

 60

 60

 60

 60

 60

 60

 60

 60

 60

 60

 60

 60

 60

 60

 60

 60

 60

 60

 60

 60

 60

 60

 60

 60

 60

HATCHERY

 3

 0

 2

 1

 0

 0

 1

 1

 0

 1

 1

 0

 0

 0

 0

 1

 1

 0

 0

 1

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 2

C.F.S.

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

JANUARY 2005 LAKE NATOMA DAILY OPERATIONS RUN DATE: February 22, 2005

IN LAKE

EVAP

C.F.S.

COMPUTED*

ACRE-FEET

RELEASE - C.F.S.

TOTALS -61 47,878 45,277 0 1,860 15

ACRE-FEET -61 94,966 89,807 0 3,689 30

COMMENTS:

* COMPUTED INFLOW IS THE SUM OF CHANGE IN STORAGE, RELEASES AND EVAPORATION.

SUMMARY

RELEASES (ACRE-FEET)

POWER 89,807

SPILL 0

FOLSOM SOUTH CANAL

HATCHERY

 1,496

 3,689

 7,946

FOLSOM

SOUTH 

CANAL

 20

 20

 23

 30

 33

 36

 31

 25

 25

 25

 25

 25

 25

 17

 12

 12

 12

 12

 12

 22

 35

 40

 40

 34

 30

 30

 30

 20

 33

 10

 10

 754

 1,496

(1)

(1) INCHES OF EVAPORATION TAKEN FROM FOLSOM PAN.

RELEASES (ACRE-FEET)

TOTAL 94,992

Table 12