alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
From File WorkSheet.wst

Full Precision OFF

Confidence Coefficient 0.95

Number of Valid Observations 3

Number of Distinct Observations 3

Minimum 1.23

Maximum 2.48

Number of Valid Observations 12

Number of Distinct Observations 12

Minimum 0.6

Maximum 2.94

Mean of Raw Data 1.298

Standard Deviation of Raw Data 0.884

Kstar 2.216

Mean of Log Transformed Data 0.077

Standard Deviation of Log Transformed Data 0.608

Correlation Coefficient R 0.887

Shapiro Wilk Test Statistic 0.771

Shapiro Wilk Critical (0.95) Value 0.859

Approximate Shapiro Wilk P Value 0.00453

Lilliefors Test Statistic 0.257

Lilliefors Critical (0.95) Value 0.256

Correlation Coefficient R 0.948

A-D Test Statistic 0.903

A-D Critical (0.95) Value 0.739

K-S Test Statistic 0.232
K-S Critical(0.95) Value 0.248

Correlation Coefficient R 0.931

Shapiro Wilk Test Statistic 0.844

Shapiro Wilk Critical (0.95) Value 0.859

Approximate Shapiro Wilk P Value 0.0441

Lilliefors Test Statistic 0.201

Lilliefors Critical (0.95) Value 0.256
(No. 73-CC-214

#### Atlantic Richfield, Claimant, *vs.*State of Illinois, Department of Law Enforcement, Respondent.

*Opinion filed July 12, 1973.*

Atlantic Richfield, Claimant, pro se.

William J. Scott, Attorney General; William E. Webber, Assistant Attorney General, for Respondent.

Per Curiam.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Postal Service

# AGENCY:

                        Postal Service TM                        .                    

# ACTION:

Notice.

# SUMMARY:

Postal Service notice of its filing a request with the Postal Regulatory Commission to add Global Plus 1B and 2B Negotiated Service Agreements to the Competitive Products List pursuant to 39 U.S.C. 3642.

# DATES:

January 18, 2011.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Margaret M. Falwell, 202-268-2576.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    The United States Postal Service® hereby gives notice that it filed with the Postal Regulatory Commission, on December 9, 2010,                     *Requests of United States Postal Service to Add Global Plus 1B and 2B Negotiated Service Agreements to the Competitive Product List, and Notice of Filing (Under Seal) the Enabling Governor's Decisions and Two Functionally Equivalent Agreements*                     for each filing. Documents are available at                     *http://www.prc.gov,*                     Docket Nos. MC2011-7, MC2011-8, CP2011-39, CP2011-40, CP2011-41 and CP2011-42.                

Neva R. Watson,

Attorney, Legislative.

[FR Doc. 2011-855 Filed 1-14-11; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 7710-12-P
COURT OF APPEALS OF VIRGINIA

Present: Judges Elder, Beal es and Senior Judge Annunziata

STANLEY MAURICE HOOD MEMORANDUM OPINION * v. Record No. 2732-08-4 PER CURIAM APRIL 14, 2009 GDI, INC. AND NATIONAL FIRE INSURANCE COMPANY

FROM THE VIRGINIA WORKERS’ COMPENSATION COMMISSION

(James R. Becker, on brief), for appellant.

(Jennifer G. Capocelli; Law Offi ces of Roya Palmer Ewing, on brief), for appellees.

Stanley Maurice Hood (claimant) contends the Workers’ Compensation Commission

erred in finding that his applic ation alleging a change in cond ition was barred by the applicable

statute of limitations contained in Code § 65.2- 708. We have reviewed the record and the

commission’s opinion and fi nd that this appeal is without meri t. Accordingly, we affirm for the

reasons stated by the commission in its final opinion. See Hood v. GDI, Inc. , VWC File

No. 208-18-62 (Oct. 17, 2008). We dispense with oral argument and summarily affirm because

the facts and legal contentions are adequately pr esented in the materials before the Court and

argument would not aid the decisional process. See Code § 17.1-403; Rule 5A:27.

Affirmed.

* Pursuant to Code § 17.1-413, this opin ion is not designated for publication.
###### Editorial Note on Part 53

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 53 appear by T.D. ATF-447, 66 FR 19088, Apr. 13, 2001.

#### § 53.1 Introduction.

The regulations in this part (part 53, subchapter C, chapter I, title 27, Code of Federal Regulations) are designated “Manufacturers Excise Taxes—Firearms and Ammunition.” The regulations relate to the tax on the sale of firearms and ammunition imposed by section 4181 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, and to certain related administrative provisions of chapter 32, subchapter F, of the Code. Chapter 32, subchapter D of the Code imposes taxes on the sale or use by the manufacturer, producer, or importer of certain recreational equipment specified in that chapter. References in the regulations in this part to the “Internal Revenue Code” or the “Code” are references to the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 (United States Code of 1986), as amended, unless otherwise indicated. References to a section or other provision of law are references to a section or other provision of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended, unless otherwise indicated.
FIRST AMENDMENT TO EXCLUSIVE RAGNAROK
AUTHORIZATION AND DISTRIBUTION AGREEMENT
 th
 RECITALS
 WHEREAS nd
 WHEREAS
 WHEREAS
 NOW, THEREFORE
 1. Renewal Term
  nd st
  2. Renewal Authorization Fee
  1




---



##### 



a.
    
    Fifty Thousand US Dollars (US$ 50,000) shall be paid no later than May 31, 2011 and;b.
    
    Fifty Thousand US Dollars (US$50,000) shall be paid no later than July 31, 2011.
 3. Continuing Effectiveness of the Agreement
  IN WITNESS WHEREOF
  Gravity Co., Ltd.
    
    Level Up! Interactive S.ABy: ________________________________________
    
    By: ________________________________________Name: Toshiro OHNO
    
    Name: Julio VieitezTitle: President & CEO
    
    Title: Managing DirectorGravity Co., Ltd.
    
    Level Up! Interactive S.ABy: ________________________________________
    
    By: ________________________________________Name: Yoon Seok Kang
    
    Name: Andréa Finardi LançoniTitle: CEO
    
    Title: Financial Director
 2
**Exhibit 31.2**CERTIFICATIONI, Suzanne Long, Senior VP & C.F.O., certify that: 1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Integrity Bancshares, Inc.;  2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of amaterial fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made,in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleadingwith respect to the period covered by this report;  3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financialinformation included in this report, fairly present in all material respects thefinancial condition, results of operations, and cash flows of the registrant as of, andfor, the periods presented in this report;  4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible forestablishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in ExchangeAct Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (asdefined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and have:(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused suchdisclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, toensure that material information relating to the registrant, including itsconsolidated subsidiary, is made known to us by others within thoseentities, particularly during the period in which this report is beingprepared;(b) Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused suchinternal controls over financial reporting to be designed under oursupervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability offinancial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for externalpurposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles;(c) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls andprocedures and presented in this report our conclusions about theeffectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end ofthe period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and(d) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internalcontrol over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s mostrecent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likelyto materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting; and
24

 
 5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on ourmost recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to theregistrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors:(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design oroperation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonablylikely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process,summarize and report financial information; and(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or otheremployees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal controlover financial reporting.November 14, 2006     /s/ Suzanne Long     Suzanne Long, Senior VP & C.F.O.
September 2023

 STORAGE1000 ACRE-FEET COMPUTED* RELEASE - C.F.S. EVAPORATION PRECIP

DAY ELEV IN LAKE CHANGE INFLOW

C.F.S. POWER SPILL OUTLET C. F. S. INCHES INCHES

1,920.0

1 1,044.68 1,917.1 -2.9 1,039 2,384 0 0 122 0.35 0.00

2 1,044.55 1,915.7 -1.4 946 1,639 0 0 14 0.04 0.14

3 1,044.38 1,913.9 -1.8 941 1,813 0 0 52 0.15 0.00

4 1,044.21 1,912.0 -1.8 992 1,881 0 0 35 0.10 0.00

5 1,044.11 1,911.0 -1.1 994 1,471 0 0 66 0.19 0.00

6 1,043.97 1,909.4 -1.5 1,060 1,723 0 0 97 0.28 0.00

7 1,043.92 1,908.9 -0.5 1,081 1,265 0 0 87 0.25 0.00

8 1,043.81 1,907.7 -1.2 1,075 1,563 0 0 108 0.31 0.00

9 1,043.81 1,907.7 0.0 1,052 951 0 0 101 0.29 0.00

10 1,043.68 1,906.3 -1.4 1,051 1,414 0 282 59 0.17 0.31

11 1,043.47 1,904.1 -2.3 1,135 2,168 0 0 104 0.30 0.00

12 1,043.39 1,903.2 -0.9 1,108 1,433 0 0 108 0.31 0.00

13 1,043.33 1,902.6 -0.6 1,192 1,420 0 0 97 0.28 0.00

14 1,043.29 1,902.1 -0.4 1,067 1,187 0 0 97 0.28 0.00

15 1,043.32 1,902.5 0.3 1,167 910 0 0 94 0.27 0.00

16 1,043.32 1,902.5 0.0 1,077 994 0 0 83 0.24 0.00

17 1,043.28 1,902.0 -0.4 1,217 1,351 0 0 83 0.24 0.00

18 1,043.13 1,900.4 -1.6 975 1,704 0 0 83 0.24 0.00

19 1,043.10 1,900.1 -0.3 1,210 1,300 0 0 73 0.21 0.00

20 1,043.20 1,901.2 1.1 1,056 452 0 0 62 0.18 0.00

21 1,043.16 1,900.7 -0.4 1,236 1,373 0 0 80 0.23 0.00

22 1,043.10 1,900.1 -0.6 1,092 1,355 0 0 62 0.18 0.00

23 1,043.03 1,899.3 -0.8 1,150 1,456 0 0 73 0.21 0.00

24 1,043.00 1,899.0 -0.3 1,221 1,293 0 0 90 0.26 0.00

25 1,042.92 1,898.2 -0.9 1,179 1,521 0 0 90 0.26 0.00

26 1,042.79 1,896.8 -1.4 876 1,504 0 0 73 0.21 0.00

27 1,042.76 1,896.5 -0.3 1,141 1,241 0 0 62 0.18 0.00

28 1,042.77 1,896.6 0.1 975 852 0 0 69 0.20 0.00

29 1,042.79 1,896.8 0.2 1,202 1,000 0 0 94 0.27 0.00

30 1,042.76 1,896.5 -0.3 1,120 1,237 0 0 45 0.13 0.00

TOTALS -23.4 32,627 41,855 0 282 2,363 6.81 0.45

ACRE-FEET -23,400 64,716 83,019 0 559 4,687

Comments: * COMPUTED INFLOW IS THE SUM OF CHANGE IN STORAGE, RELEASES, PUMPING AND EVAPORATION

 SUMMARY

Release (ACRE-FEET)

Power 83,019 Outlet 559

Spill 0 Total Releases 83,579

Precipitation

This month = 0.45

October 01, 2022 To date = 47.61

Historical Archive and Report Database

New Melones Lake Daily Operations

Run Date: 10/10/2023
Exhibit 12.1              /s/ Pasquale NatuzziName:
    Pasquale NatuzziTitle:
    Chief Executive Officer
May 4, 2012 

Mr. Dennis DeVany 

Chief, Essential Air Service Division 

Office of Aviation Analysis 

Department ofTransportation 

1200 New Jersey Avenue SE, 

Washington, D.C. 20590 

") 0 _} 

Reference; DOT-OST-2008-0209, 2001-10685, 2009-0305, 2000-7856 

EAS>Muscle Shoals, AL, Greenville, MS, Laurel/Hattiesburg, MS and Tupelo, MS 

Dear Mr. DeVany, 

The Shoals Chamber of Commerce is pleased to lend its support to the proposal of Silver Airways to 

provide essential air service at Muscle Shoals as replacement for current Delta Air Lines service. 

Local air service that provides an effective connection to the national and international air 

transportation system is critical to the economic well being of the Shoals area and to the Shoals 

Chamber of Commerce. We at rely on our local air service for both business and leisure travel. 

The Silver Airways proposals offer us a modern 34-seat turboprop aircraft and flights to Atlanta, which is 

not only the largest hub airport in the world but also a popular business and leisure travel destination 

from the Shoals in its own right. 

We, the Shoals, believe the Silver Airways service proposals represent the best option for retaining our 

local air service long term and building up traffic so that government subsidies can eventually be 

reduced or eliminated. 

We urge the Department of Transportation to approve Silver Airways as the designated carrier to 

provide the Shoals essential air service. 

Sincerely, 

Steve Holt 

President 

Shoals Chamber of Commerce 

20 Hightower Place 

P.O. Box 1331 

Florence, AL 3 563 1-13 31 

(256) 764-4661 

Fax (256) 766-9017 

www.shoalschamber.com 

Fully Accredited by the U. 5. Chamber of Commerce
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, *v.*Louis Streicher and David Taffet, Appellants.

First Department,

May 1, 1914.

Crime — petit larceny by means of false pretenses — evidence insufficient to sustain conviction.

Upon the trial of defendants for the crime of petit larceny perpetrated by means of false pretenses, inducing the plaintiff to advance a certain amount of money upon the security of jewelry, which they fraudulently and falsely represented to be worth a certain amount, whereas in fact it was of little value, there can be no conviction in the absence of evidence of the value of the jewelry. 2iot only the making of the representations, but their falsity, must be shown.

Appeal by the defendants, Louis Streicher and another, from a judgment of the Court of "Special Sessions of the City of New York, rendered against them on the 31st day of March, 1913, convicting them of the crime of petit larceny.

*K. Henry Rosenberg,*for the appellants.

*George Z. Medalie, for*the respondent.

Scott, J.:

The defendants were convicted in the Court of Special Sessions of the crime of petit larceny by means of false pretenses, the claim being that they had induced the complaining witness, an apparently ignorant woman, to advance $25 upon the security of two earrings which they falsely and fraudulently represented to be worth $400, whereas in fact and truth the said earrings were not worth $400 or even $25.

The representations were fully proven and the earrings were produced in court, but no evidence whatever was given as to their value. The crime, therefore, was not proven for it was essential in order to establish it that the People should show not only the making of the representations, but their falsity. The objection was timely made by the defendants’ counsel, but was overruled and ignored by the court.

It may be that the defendants were guilty, as the district attorney insists, but to justify their conviction it was essential that some proof should be given of each essential element going *182to constitute the crime for which they were- tried. This was not done.

The judgment of conviction must, therefore, be reversed and a new trial granted.

Ingraham, P. J., McLaughlin, Laughlin and Dowling, JJ., concurred.

Judgment reversed and new trial ordered. Order to be settled on notice.
Editorial Note on Part 40
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 40 appear by T.D. ATF-460, 66 FR 39094-39096, July 27, 2001; T.D. ATF-464, 66 FR 43479, Aug. 20, 2001; and T.D. TTB-91, 76 FR 5479, Feb. 1, 2011.

§ 40.216 Notice for smokeless tobacco. ( a ) *Product designation.* Every package of chewing tobacco or snuff shall, before removal subject to tax, have adequately imprinted thereon, or on a label securely affixed thereto, the designation “chewing tobacco” or “snuff.” As an alternative, packages of chewing tobacco may be designated “Tax Class C”, and packages of snuff may be designated “Tax Class M”.
( b ) *Product weight.* Every package of chewing tobacco or snuff shall, before removal subject to tax, have adequately imprinted thereon, or on a label securely affixed thereto, a clear statement of the actual pounds and ounces of the product contained therein. As an alternative, the shipping cases containing packages of chewing tobacco or snuff may, before removal, have adequately imprinted thereon, or on a label securely affixed thereto, a clear statement, in pounds and ounces, of the total weight of the product, the tax class of the product, and the total number of the packages of product contained therein.
(Approved by the Office of Management and Budget under control number 1512-0502) (Sec. 202, Pub. L. 85-859, 72 Stat. 1422 (26 U.S.C. 5723))
[T.D. ATF-243, 51 FR 43194, Dec. 1, 1986, as amended by T.D. ATF-446, 66 FR 16602, Mar. 27, 2001]
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          SEP-30-1995
<PERIOD-START>                             OCT-01-1994
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1995
<CASH>                                          16,904
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                16,904
<PP&E>                                       1,437,466
<DEPRECIATION>                                 960,685
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,765,243
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        1,758,312
<BONDS>                                        861,204
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                           10,531
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                  15,230,935
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 1,765,243
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               625,170
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             5,822,809
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               222,562
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              73,515
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (5,242,591)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (5,242,591)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                 26,176
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (5,216,415)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

DAY ELEV

 1,047.46

 1,048.14

 1,048.79

 1,049.26

 1,049.75

 1,050.31

 1,050.72

 1,050.97

 1,051.15

 1,051.25

 1,051.29

 1,051.23

 1,051.01

 1,050.82

 1,050.67

 1,050.54

 1,050.41

 1,050.38

 1,051.09

 1,051.19

 1,051.24

 1,051.37

 1,051.40

 1,051.38

 1,051.30

 1,051.18

 1,051.12

 1,051.02

 1,051.01

 1,051.00

 1,947.2

 1,954.6

 1,961.7

 1,966.9

 1,972.3

 1,978.4

 1,982.9

 1,985.7

 1,987.6

 1,988.7

 1,989.2

 1,988.5

 1,986.1

 1,984.0

 1,982.4

 1,980.9

 1,979.5

 1,979.2

 1,987.0

 1,988.1

 1,988.6

 1,990.1

 1,990.4

 1,990.2

 1,989.3

 1,988.0

 1,987.3

 1,986.2

 1,986.1

 1,986.0

STORAGE

+6.4

+7.4

+7.1

+5.1

+5.4

+6.2

+4.5

+2.8

+2.0

+1.1

+0.4

-0.7

-2.4

-2.1

-1.7

-1.4

-1.4

-0.3

+7.8

+1.1

+0.6

+1.4

+0.3

-0.2

-0.9

-1.3

-0.7

-1.1

-0.1

-0.1

CHANGE

4,715

4,934

4,778

4,390

4,310

4,369

4,143

3,669

3,229

3,358

3,394

3,178

3,134

3,169

3,122

3,183

3,327

3,929

8,013

4,484

4,506

4,391

3,844

3,673

3,644

3,343

3,188

3,092

3,203

3,250

INFLOW

 1,429

 1,106

 1,151

 1,762

 1,542

 1,197

 1,801

 2,247

 2,228

 2,733

 3,118

 3,469

 4,283

 4,223

 3,883

 3,847

 3,963

 4,045

 4,028

 3,866

 4,075

 3,622

 3,620

 3,727

 4,060

 3,965

 3,444

 3,559

 3,188

 3,198

POWER

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

SPILL

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

OUTLET

 49

 92

 46

 35

 60

 71

 68

 36

 0

 68

 54

 43

 75

 0

 71

 57

 85

 50

 46

 61

 153

 46

 57

 57

 29

 46

 78

 89

 71

 107

C.F.S.

 .14

 .26

 .13

 .10

 .17

 .20

 .19

 .10

 .00

 .19

 .15

 .12

 .21

 .00

 .20

 .16

 .24

 .14

 .13

 .17

 .43

 .13

 .16

 .16

 .08

 .13

 .22

 .25

 .20

 .30

INCHES

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .19

 .13

 .04

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .02

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .06

 .06

 .02

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .02

 .04

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

PRECIP

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

APRIL 2011 NEW MELONES LAKE DAILY OPERATIONS RUN DATE: May 1, 2011

IN LAKE

EVAPORATION

INCHES

C.F.S.

COMPUTED*

1000 ACRE-FEET

RELEASE - C.F.S.

TOTALS +45.2 116,962 92,379 0 0 1,800 5.06 .58

ACRE-FEET +45,200 231,994 183,234 0 0 3,570

COMMENTS:

* COMPUTED INFLOW IS THE SUM OF CHANGE IN STORAGE, RELEASES AND EVAPORATION.

SUMMARY

RELEASE (ACRE-FEET)

POWER 183,234

SPILL 0

OUTLET

TOTAL

 0

 183,234

PRECIPITATION

THIS MONTH =

TO DATE =

 .58

JULY 1, 2010 41.70

 1,940.8