alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Editorial Note on Part 53
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 53 appear by T.D. ATF-447, 66 FR 19088, Apr. 13, 2001.

§ 53.22 Employer identification number. ( a ) *Requirement of application.* ( 1 ) Except for one-time or occasional filers, every person who makes a sale or use of an article with respect to which a tax is imposed by section 4181 of the Code, and who has not earlier been assigned an employer identification number or has not applied for one, shall make an application on Form SS-4 for an employer identification number. The application and any supplementary statement accompanying it shall be prepared in accordance with the applicable form, instructions, and regulations and shall set forth fully and clearly the data therein called for. Form SS-4 may be obtained from any internal revenue district office or internal revenue service center. The application shall be filed with the internal revenue officer designated in the instructions applicable to Form SS-4. The application shall be signed by: ( i ) The individual if the person is an individual;
( ii ) The president, vice-president, or other principal officer, if the person is a corporation;
( iii ) A responsible and duly authorized member or officer having knowledge of its affairs, if the person is a partnership or other unincorporated organization; or
( iv ) The fiduciary, if the person is a trust or estate. An employer identification number will be assigned to the person in due course upon the basis of information reported on the application required under this section.
( 2 ) *Time for filing Form SS-4.* The application for an employer identification number shall be filed no later than the seventh day after the date of the first sale or use of an article with respect to which a tax is imposed by chapter 32 of the Code. However, the application should be filed far enough in advance of the first required use of such number to permit issuance of the number in time for compliance with such requirement.
( 3 ) *One-time or occasional filers.* A person who files a return under the provisions of section 53.151(a)(5) is not required to make application for an employer identification number. Such persons may use their social security number on any return, statement or other document submitted to TTB by that person in lieu of an employer identification number.
( b ) *Use of employer identification number.* The employer identification number assigned to a person liable for a tax imposed by chapter 32 of the Code shall be shown on any return, statement, or other document submitted to TTB by the person.
[T.D. ATF-308, 56 FR 303, Jan. 3, 1991, as amended by T.D. ATF-365, 60 FR 33670, June 28, 1995; T.D. ATF-447, 66 FR 19088, Apr. 13, 2001]
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 04-50319 Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus IGNACIO CASTRO-BALDERAS, also known as Stephen Medina-Telfino, also known as Alfonso Luna, Defendant-Appellant.

-------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas USDC No. EP-03-CR-2059-ALL-DB

-------------------- Before HIGGINBOTHAM, DAVIS, and PICKERING, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: *Appealing the Judgment in a Criminal Case, Ignacio CastroBalderas concedes that the arguments raised are foreclosed by circuit precedent but seeks to preserve them for further review. The Government has moved for summary affirmance in lieu of filing an appellee’s brief. The motion is GRANTED, and the judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED. United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit 

## F I L E D August 18, 2004 Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk
###### Editorial Note on Part 28

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 28 appear by T.D. ATF-477, 67 FR 18087 through 18090, Apr. 15, 2002.

#### § 28.301 Loss of distilled spirits in transit.

The tax on distilled spirits withdrawn without payment of tax under this part and which are lost during transportation from the bonded premises of the distilled spirits plant from which withdrawn to (a) the port of export, (b) the manufacturing bonded warehouse, (c) the vessel or aircraft, (d) the foreign-trade zone, or (e) the customs bonded warehouse, as the case may be, may be remitted if evidence satisfactory to the appropriate TTB officer establishes that such distilled spirits have not been unlawfully diverted, or lost by theft with connivance, collusion, fraud, or negligence on the part of the exporter, owner, consignor, consignee, bailee, or carrier or the employees or agents of any of them: *Provided,* That such remission in the case of loss of distilled spirits by theft shall only be allowed to the extent that the claimant is not indemnified against or recompensed in respect of the tax for such loss.

(72 Stat. 1323, as amended, 84 Stat. 1965; 26 U.S.C. 5008, 5066)

[T.D. 7112, 36 FR 8583, May 8, 1971. Redesignated at 40 FR 16835, Apr. 15, 1975, and amended by T.D. TTB-8, 69 FR 3834, Jan. 27, 2004]
#### Trojan Publishing Corporation, Appellant, v. Manufacturers Trust Company, Defendant, and Commercial National Bank & Trust Company of New York et al., Respondents. (Action No. 1.) Arrow Publications, Inc., Appellant, v. Manufacturers Trust Company, Defendant, and Commercial National Bank & Trust Company of New York et al., Respondents. (Action No. 2.)

—Judgments and orders unanimously affirmed, with one bill of costs of these appeals. Ho opinion. Present — Peck, P. J., Glennon, Cohn, Callahan and Van Voorhis, JJ. [See post, p. 878.]
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

DAY ELEV

 991.28

 991.07

 990.82

 990.58

 990.25

 989.97

 989.73

 989.56

 989.34

 989.07

 988.81

 988.54

 988.25

 987.94

 987.66

 987.32

 986.96

 986.50

 986.03

 985.52

 985.08

 984.66

 984.24

 983.77

 983.27

 982.77

 982.30

 981.85

 981.36

 980.90

 1,392.4

 1,390.6

 1,388.4

 1,386.2

 1,383.3

 1,380.8

 1,378.7

 1,377.2

 1,375.3

 1,372.9

 1,370.6

 1,368.2

 1,365.7

 1,363.0

 1,360.5

 1,357.6

 1,354.4

 1,350.4

 1,346.3

 1,341.9

 1,338.1

 1,334.4

 1,330.8

 1,326.8

 1,322.5

 1,318.2

 1,314.1

 1,310.3

 1,306.1

 1,302.2

STORAGE

-2.6

-1.9

-2.2

-2.1

-2.9

-2.5

-2.1

-1.5

-1.9

-2.4

-2.3

-2.4

-2.5

-2.7

-2.4

-3.0

-3.1

-4.0

-4.1

-4.4

-3.8

-3.6

-3.6

-4.1

-4.3

-4.3

-4.0

-3.9

-4.2

-3.9

CHANGE

780

972

924

1,008

739

646

728

742

806

650

682

719

637

767

829

600

498

535

444

502

550

575

404

403

259

204

367

254

192

215

INFLOW

 1,967

 1,783

 1,932

 1,967

 2,114

 1,803

 1,687

 1,389

 1,701

 1,769

 1,737

 1,817

 1,816

 2,033

 1,944

 1,979

 1,957

 2,448

 2,418

 2,623

 2,379

 2,294

 2,131

 2,321

 2,308

 2,264

 2,306

 2,083

 2,181

 2,098

POWER

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

SPILL

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

OUTLET

 112

 129

 109

 112

 97

 91

 108

 108

 83

 80

 97

 97

 105

 105

 119

 119

 127

 107

 90

 109

 95

 112

 103

 125

 120

 105

 91

 113

 119

 94

C.F.S.

 .39

 .45

 .38

 .39

 .34

 .32

 .38

 .38

 .29

 .28

 .34

 .34

 .37

 .37

 .42

 .42

 .45

 .38

 .32

 .39

 .34

 .40

 .37

 .45

 .43

 .38

 .33

 .41

 .43

 .34

INCHES

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

PRECIP

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

JUNE 2004 NEW MELONES LAKE DAILY OPERATIONS RUN DATE: July 27, 2004

IN LAKE

EVAPORATION

INCHES

C.F.S.

COMPUTED*

1000 ACRE-FEET

RELEASE - C.F.S.

TOTALS -92.7 17,631 61,249 0 0 3,181 11.28 .00

ACRE-FEET -92,700 34,971 121,487 0 0 6,310

COMMENTS:

* COMPUTED INFLOW IS THE SUM OF CHANGE IN STORAGE, RELEASES AND EVAPORATION.

SUMMARY

RELEASE (ACRE-FEET)

POWER 121,487

SPILL 0

OUTLET

TOTAL

 0

 121,487

PRECIPITATION

THIS MONTH =

TO DATE =

 .00

JULY 1, 2003 20.74

 1,395.0

Table 13
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

DAY ELEV

 1,901.50

 1,901.45

 1,901.49

 1,900.97

 1,901.42

 1,901.50

 1,901.55

 1,901.76

 1,901.24

 1,901.89

 1,901.53

 1,901.06

 1,900.25

 1,900.93

 1,901.40

 1,901.14

 1,901.40

 1,901.30

 1,901.35

 1,901.44

 1,901.16

 1,901.22

 1,901.31

 1,901.32

 1,901.36

 1,901.30

 1,901.36

 1,901.07

 1,901.08

 1,901.64

 14,285

 14,248

 14,278

 13,889

 14,225

 14,285

 14,322

 14,479

 14,091

 14,577

 14,307

 13,956

 13,359

 13,859

 14,210

 14,016

 14,210

 14,135

 14,173

 14,240

 14,031

 14,076

 14,143

 14,150

 14,180

 14,135

 14,180

 13,963

 13,971

 14,390

STORAGE

-7

-37

+30

-389

+336

+60

+37

+157

-388

+486

-270

-351

-597

+500

+351

-194

+194

-75

+38

+67

-209

+45

+67

+7

+30

-45

+45

-217

+8

+419

CHANGE

1,820

1,785

1,823

1,119

1,454

1,813

1,799

566

736

893

668

2,266

1,103

2,043

2,057

1,825

2,047

1,653

1,829

1,866

1,779

1,841

1,840

1,787

1,801

1,812

1,820

1,713

1,783

2,376

INFLOW

 80

 80

 80

 80

 80

 80

 80

 79

 80

 80

 78

 80

 80

 80

 80

 80

 80

 80

 80

 80

 80

 80

 80

 80

 80

 80

 80

 80

 80

 80

POWER

 324

 322

 299

 278

 274

 278

 280

 280

 291

 304

 300

 301

 295

 298

 304

 311

 310

 310

 311

 311

 310

 310

 311

 311

 308

 309

 306

 308

 308

 309

SPILL

 66

 66

 74

 81

 81

 81

 81

 80

 81

 81

 79

 81

 81

 81

 81

 81

 81

 81

 81

 81

 81

 81

 81

 81

 81

 80

 80

 80

 80

 80

OUTLETS

 4

 5

 6

 6

 7

 5

 6

 3

 1

 3

 3

 4

 5

 4

 4

 4

 4

 0

 0

 3

 3

 2

 3

 3

 3

 3

 4

 4

 3

 3

C.F.S.

 .20

 .22

 .27

 .26

 .32

 .24

 .26

 .15

 .06

 .15

 .15

 .20

 .25

 .20

 .19

 .17

 .17

 .00

 .00

 .14

 .12

 .08

 .12

 .14

 .14

 .15

 .19

 .17

 .16

 .13

INCHES

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

SEPTEMBER 2010 LEWISTON LAKE DAILY OPERATIONS RUN DATE: October 1, 2010

IN LAKE

EVAPORATION

C.F.S. FRANCIS CARR

COMPUTED*

ACRE-FEET

RELEASE - C.F.S. 

TOTALS +98 49,717 2,397 2,385 9,071 108 5.00

ACRE-FEET +98 98,614 4,754 4,731 17,992 214

* COMPUTED INFLOW IS THE SUM OF CHANGE IN STORAGE, RELEASES AND EVAPORATION.

(1) OUTLET RELEASE INCLUDES THE CONTINUOUS FISH RELEASE OF 75 C.F.S.

(2) INCHES OF EVAPORATION TAKEN FROM PAN AT TRINITY RIVER HATCHERY

SUMMARY

RELEASE (ACRE-FEET)

TOTAL POWER 4,754

TOTAL RIVER 27,477 98,302

 14,292

 70,825

RIVER

JUDGE FRANCIS CARR POWERPLANT

TOTAL RELEASE

JUDGE (2)

(1) POWERPLANT

 1,350

 1,331

 1,349

 870

 843

 1,339

 1,333

 45

 479

 180

 344

 1,977

 943

 1,328

 1,411

 1,447

 1,474

 1,220

 1,338

 1,357

 1,410

 1,345

 1,331

 1,308

 1,314

 1,363

 1,327

 1,350

 1,308

 1,693

 35,707

 70,825
### February 4, 2010

Dear Owner/Resident:
A Lead Based Paint (LBP) assessment was recently performed on your property by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) as part of the Omaha Lead Superfund Site investigation. The purpose of this assessment is to determine whether a significant quantity of lead based paint is present on the exterior surface of structures, where deteriorating paint conditions (peeling, flaking, cracking, etc.) exist that might increase lead concentrations in the yard above acceptable levels. As requested, enclosed are the LBP assessment sheets for 2511 AMES AV along with a LBP Fact Sheet. The EPA is currently developing paint stabilization eligibility criteria and at this time can not identify which homes will ultimately be eligible for EPA-funded paint stabilization. At present, paint stabilization is being offered at only those households with the most severe LPB problems, particularly where children under the age of 7 reside. The EPA stresses the importance of maintaining painted surfaces where any amount of LBP is present. The LBP Fact Sheet provides information pertaining to the EPA’s Exterior LBP Response Program. Once the eligibility criterion is finalized (and if your property qualifies) a representative from EPA or the Omaha Lead Hazard Control Program (LHCP) will contact you to arrange for paint stabilization at your property. Exposure to lead contamination can adversely affect the development and behavior of young children. If you have children less than seven years of age living in your home, we strongly recommend that you contact your doctor or the Douglas County Health Department at (402) 444-7825 and arrange to have their blood tested. If you have any questions or concerns, please contact the EPA Public Information Center at (402) 731-3045.

Sincerely,

Steve M Langum

Black & Veatch Special Projects Corp. 6601 College Blvd. Overland Park, KS 66211 USA Telephone: 913-458-2900

### Omaha Lead Site 

### LBP Assessment 

# I 

# UI IIIII 

# IIII IIIII IIIII Ill 

# 1111 3425 8

LEGEND: H 

# - N 

# - P 

# - 01 

# - 34258 Samples Analyzed I LBVID Number XRF Unit: 

# 2.2173 fook 

# 357

Sample Number Lead Loading StructureIFeature Substrate Color Deteriorated (Wfndow, sicling, porch, etc.) (Wood, concrete, etc.) Area



# - - ft' 

# -- P 

## --- 34258 rng/cn~



## - 

# - ft2



## -- P 

## --- 34258 rng/c~

lev LBP-1 1 Prmted 21.Jul49 W701 01 23Omaha Lead Site Address: 251 1 AMES AV Site Sketch 

### P LBP Assessment Phone: H: (402) 572-8570 ALT:

- Plan View 

# - lndicate number of stories and perimeter dimensions of structure lndicate regions of deterioration and describe (Deterioration coutd inckfde surfaces that are warn due to friction, checking. crecking end Lking, allgatoring, blistenng andlor peelng)
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY ELEV

 1,030.48

 1,030.61

 1,030.70

 1,030.78

 1,030.84

 1,030.82

 1,030.91

 1,030.97

 1,031.06

 1,031.13

 1,031.17

 1,031.16

 1,031.22

 1,031.28

 1,031.19

 1,031.17

 1,031.27

 1,031.34

 1,031.41

 1,031.46

 1,031.59

 1,031.69

 1,031.77

 1,031.93

 1,032.07

 1,032.16

 1,032.26

 1,032.30

 1,032.39

 1,032.49

 1,032.58

 1,767.6

 1,768.9

 1,769.9

 1,770.7

 1,771.3

 1,771.1

 1,772.0

 1,772.6

 1,773.6

 1,774.3

 1,774.7

 1,774.6

 1,775.2

 1,775.8

 1,774.9

 1,774.7

 1,775.7

 1,776.4

 1,777.2

 1,777.7

 1,779.0

 1,780.1

 1,780.9

 1,782.5

 1,784.0

 1,784.9

 1,785.9

 1,786.4

 1,787.3

 1,788.3

 1,789.2

STORAGE

+2.4

+1.3

+0.9

+0.8

+0.6

-0.2

+0.9

+0.6

+0.9

+0.7

+0.4

-0.1

+0.6

+0.6

-0.9

-0.2

+1.0

+0.7

+0.7

+0.5

+1.3

+1.0

+0.8

+1.7

+1.4

+0.9

+1.0

+0.4

+0.9

+1.0

+0.9

CHANGE

1,222

694

493

438

332

389

503

338

494

388

235

480

339

336

325

440

1,019

714

493

591

740

647

685

863

833

678

768

589

691

554

507

INFLOW

 14

 14

 14

 14

 14

 14

 14

 14

 14

 14

 14

 14

 14

 14

 766

 544

 472

 308

 116

 324

 54

 120

 197

 14

 91

 196

 244

 347

 202

 19

 21

POWER

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

SPILL

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 458

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 508

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

OUTLET

 17

 7

 13

 10

 7

 20

 23

 13

 13

 10

 13

 10

 13

 10

 27

 0

 27

 43

 13

 7

 10

 7

 73

 17

 13

 13

 3

 33

 20

 13

 17

C.F.S.

 .05

 .02

 .04

 .03

 .02

 .06

 .07

 .04

 .04

 .03

 .04

 .03

 .04

 .03

 .08

 .00

 .08

 .13

 .04

 .02

 .03

 .02

 .22

 .05

 .04

 .04

 .01

 .10

 .06

 .04

 .05

INCHES

 .16

 .70

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .05

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 1.05

 .04

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .49

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

PRECIP

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

DECEMBER 2018 NEW MELONES LAKE DAILY OPERATIONS RUN DATE: January 3, 2019

IN LAKE

EVAPORATION

INCHES

C.F.S.

COMPUTED*

1000 ACRE-FEET

RELEASE - C.F.S.

TOTALS +23.5 17,818 4,231 0 966 515 1.55 2.49

ACRE-FEET +23,500 35,342 8,392 0 1,916 1,022

COMMENTS:

SUMMARY

RELEASE (ACRE-FEET)

POWER 8,392

SPILL 0

OUTLET

TOTAL

 1,916

 10,308

PRECIPITATION

THIS MONTH =

TO DATE =

 2.49

JULY 1, 2018 9.92

 1,765.2

Table 13 

OCT 1, 2018 TO DATE = 9.92
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 01-30065 Summary Calendar

MARIO McKINLEY, Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus TERREBONNE PARISH SHERIFF DEPUTIES, ET AL., Defendants, BRYAN BOUGARD, Deputy; PHILIP PITRE, Deputy; DR. SPENCE; JERRY LARPENTER, Sheriff; ROBERT BERGERON, Defendants-Appellees.

- - - - - - - - - - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Louisiana

USDC No. 99-CV-2735-F

- - - - - - - - - - July 11, 2001 Before HIGGINBOTHAM, BARKSDALE, and EMILIO M. GARZA, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: * Mario McKinley has filed an application for leave to proceed in forma pauperis (IFP) on appeal, following the district court's dismissal of some, but not all, of the defendants in his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint. Because McKinley has since paid the filing fee, his IFP motion is DENIED AS MOOT.No. 01-30065 -2- McKinley does not address whether the district court’s order was final and thus appealable. This court must examine the basis of its jurisdiction on its own motion if necessary. See Mosley v. Cozby , 813 F.2d 659, 660 (5th Cir. 1987). In a case involving multiple defendants, a district court’s order is “final” only if: (1) it adjudicates all the claims of all the parties, or (2) the court expressly determines that there is “no just reason for delay” and directs entry of judgment under Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(b). Riley v. Wooten , 999 F.2d 802, 804 (5th Cir. 1993)(citation omitted). The order appealed from was not certified under Rule 54(b) and does not fall into the specific class of orders listed in 28 U.S.C. § 1292(a). The order is therefore not final, and this court is without jurisdiction to consider it. Accordingly, the appeal is DISMISSED FOR LACK OF JURISDICTION. McKinley’s pro se motion for appointment of new counsel and court-appointed counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw as counsel are DENIED WITHOUT PREJUDICE to being reasserted before the district court.
IFP MOTION DENIED AS MOOT; MOTION FOR APPOINTMENT OF NEW COUNSEL AND MOTION FOR LEAVE TO WITHDRAW AS COUNSEL DENIED WITHOUT PREJUDICE; APPEAL DISMISSED.
#### Lillie P. Garth, Individually, etc., and Others, Respondents, v. William Garth Clopton and Another, Appellants, and Others, Respondents.

Motion to dismiss appeal denied, without costs, on condition that appellants perfect then- appeal, place the case on the calendar for the December term and be ready for argument when reached; otherwise, motion granted, with costs. Present—Jenks, P. J., Bun, Thomas, Stapleton and Putnam, JJ.
### §3988. Payments; Federal share; limitation

#### (a) Federal and non-Federal shares

(1) The Secretary shall pay, to each applicant having an application approved under section 3987 of this title, the Federal share of the cost of the program described in the application.

(2) The Federal share for each fiscal year shall be 50 per centum.

(3) The non-Federal share of payments under this part may be in cash or in kind, fairly evaluated, including plant, equipment, or services.

#### (b) Fiscal year State limitation

Not more than 15 per centum of the funds appropriated under this part in any fiscal year may be paid to applicants in any single State.

(Pub. L. 98–377, title III, §309, Aug. 11, 1984, 98 Stat. 1286; Pub. L. 99–159, title II, §231, Nov. 22, 1985, 99 Stat. 900; Pub. L. 100–418, title VI, §6031(b)(2), Aug. 23, 1988, 102 Stat. 1483.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

1988—Subsecs. (a)(3), (b). Pub. L. 100–418 substituted "part" for "subchapter".

1985—Subsec. (a)(1). Pub. L. 99–159 substituted "Secretary" for "Foundation".
### §1466. Authorization of appropriations

#### (a) In general

There are authorized to be appropriated to carry out this part (other than section 1462 of this title) such sums as may be necessary for each of the fiscal years 2005 through 2010.

#### (b) Reservation

From amounts appropriated under subsection (a) for fiscal year 2005, the Secretary shall reserve $1,000,000 to carry out the study authorized in section 1464(c) of this title. From amounts appropriated under subsection (a) for a succeeding fiscal year, the Secretary may reserve an additional amount to carry out such study if the Secretary determines the additional amount is necessary.

(Pub. L. 91–230, title VI, §667, as added Pub. L. 108–446, title I, §101, Dec. 3, 2004, 118 Stat. 2787.)
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF TEXAS

- - - - - - - -

denied

NO. 14-0946

TRANSCONTINENTAL REALTY

INVESTORS, INC.

v.

SIDNEY WICKS, AS TRUSTEE OF

THE SIDNEY WICKS REVOCABLE

TRUST §

§

§

§

§

§ Dallas County,

5th District.

February 6, 2015

Petitioner 's petition for review, filed herein in the above numbered and styled case,

having been duly considered, is ordered, and hereby is, denied.

March 30, 2015

Petitioner's motion for rehearing of petition for review, filed herein in the above

numbered and styled case, having been duly considered, is ordered, and hereby is, denied.

         

I, BLAKE A. HAWTHORNE

, Clerk of the Supreme Court of Texas, do hereby certify

that the above and attached is a true and correct copy of the orders of the Supreme Court of

Texas in the case numbered and styled as above, as the same appear of record in the minutes of

said Court under the date shown.

It is further ordered that petitioner, TRANSCONTINENTAL REALTY INVESTORS,

INC., pay all costs incurred on this petition.

WITNESS my hand and seal of the Supreme Court of Texas, at the City of Austin, this

the 27th day of March, 2015

.

Blake A. Hawthorne, Clerk

By Monica Zamarripa, Deputy Clerk
###### Editorial Note on Part 70

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 70 appear by T.D. ATF-450, 66 FR 29022-29030, May 29, 2001.

#### § 70.506 Execution and filing of claim.

Claims to which this subpart is applicable must be executed on Form 2635 (5620.8) in accordance with the instructions on the form. (For provisions relating to handcarried documents, see 27 CFR 70.304). Claims for credit or refund of taxes collected by district directors of customs, to which the provisions of section 6423, I.R.C., are applicable and which Customs regulations (19 CFR Part 24—Customs Financial and Accounting Procedure) require to be filed with the appropriate TTB officer, must be executed and filed in accordance with applicable Customs regulations and this subpart. The claim must set forth each ground upon which the claim is made in sufficient detail to apprise the appropriate TTB officer of the exact basis therefor. Allegations pertaining to the bearing of the ultimate burden relate to additional conditions which must be established for a claim to be allowed and are not in themselves legal grounds for allowance of a claim. There shall also be attached to the form and made part of the claim the supporting data required by § 70.507. All evidence relied upon in support of such claim shall be clearly set forth and submitted with the claim.

[T.D.ATF-376, 61 FR 31031, June 19, 1996, as amended by T.D. ATF-450, 66 FR 29030, May 29, 2001]
#### August Tassini, an Infant, by Frank Tassini, Guardian ad Litem, Respondent, v. Paul Viane, Appellant.

Judgment and order affirmed, with costs. Ho opinion. Present — Ingraham, P. J., McLaughlin, Laughlin, Clarke and Scott, JJ.