alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                           5
<LEGEND>
This  Schedule  contains  summary  financial   information  extracted  from  the
Consolidated  Financial  Statements as  of December 31, 1997 and is qualified in
its entirety by reference to each Financial Statements.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER>                                                    1,000

<S>                                 <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                       12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                                               DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                                                  JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                                                    DEC-31-1997
<CASH>                                                                   14
<SECURITIES>                                                              0
<RECEIVABLES>                                                            62
<ALLOWANCES>                                                              0
<INVENTORY>                                                               0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                                         76
<PP&E>                                                               10,642
<DEPRECIATION>                                                          268
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                                       10,450
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                                   575
<BONDS>                                                               2,959
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                                     0
<PREFERRED>                                                              25
<COMMON>                                                             11,406
<OTHER-SE>                                                           (4,515)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                                         10,450
<SALES>                                                                   0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                                         24
<CGS>                                                                     0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                                             0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                                        599
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                                          0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                                        0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                                           0
<INCOME-TAX>                                                              0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                                    (575)
<DISCONTINUED>                                                            0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                                           0
<CHANGES>                                                                 0
<NET-INCOME>                                                           (575)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                                             0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                                             0


</TABLE>
the doctrine of law of the case, Hall v. State, 91 Nev. 314, 315-16, 535 P.2d

797, 798-99 (1975), and the district court did not err in denying this claim. Accordingly, we

ORDER the judgment of the district court AFFIRMED.



## / Hardesty

cc: Hon. Linda Marie Bell, District Judge Kenwon Montgomery Attorney General/Carson City Clark County District Attorney Eighth District Court Clerk J.

2
[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 71 (Wednesday, April 13, 2011)]
[Notices]
[Page 20624]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2011-9006]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE

Forest Service


Central Montana Resource Advisory Committee

AGENCY: Forest Service, USDA.

ACTION: Notice of meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Central Montana Resource Advisory Committee will meet in 
Stanford, Montana. The committee is meeting as authorized under the 
Secure Rural Schools and Community Self Determination Act (Pub. L. 110-
343) and in compliance with the Federal Advisory Committee Act. The 
purpose is to hold the first meeting of the newly formed committee.

DATES: The meeting will be held April 29, 2011 and will begin at 7 p.m.

ADDRESSES: The meeting will be held at the Judith Ranger District, 
located at 109 Central Avenue, Stanford, MT. Written comments should be 
sent to Ron Wiseman, Lewis and Clark National Forest, 109 Central 
Avenue, Stanford, Montana 59479. Comments may also be sent via e-mail 
to <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#7b090c12081e161a153b1d08551d1e1f550e08"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="4537322c362028242b0523366b2320216b3036">[email protected]</span></a>.
    All comments, including names and addresses when provided, are 
placed in the record and are available for public inspection and 
copying. The public may inspect comments received at Lewis and Clark 
National Forest, 109 Central Avenue, Stanford, Montana 59479. Visitors 
are encouraged to call ahead to (406) 566-2292 to facilitate entry into 
the building.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ron Wiseman, Designated Federal 
Official, USDA, Lewis and Clark National Forest, 109 Central Avenue, 
Stanford, MT 59479; (406) 566-2292; E-mail <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#95e7e2fce6f0f8f4fbd5f3e6bbf3f0f1bbe0e6"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="cebcb9a7bdaba3afa08ea8bde0a8abaae0bbbd">[email protected]</span></a>.
    Individuals who use telecommunication devices for the deaf (TDD) 
may call the Federal Information Relay Service (FIRS) at 1-800-877-8339 
between 8 a.m. and 8 p.m., Eastern Standard Time, Monday through 
Friday.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The meeting is open to the public. The 
following business will be conducted: (1) Introductions of all 
committee members, replacement members and Forest Service personnel; 
(2) Selection of a chairperson by the committee members; (3) Receive 
materials explaining the process for considering and recommending Title 
II projects; and (4) Public Comment. Persons who wish to bring related 
matters to the attention of the Committee may file written statements 
with the Committee staff before or after the meeting.

    Dated: April 7, 2011.
Ronald B. Wiseman,
Designated Federal Officer.
[FR Doc. 2011-9006 Filed 4-12-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410-11-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
###### Editorial Note on Part 71

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 71 appear by T.D. ATF-414, 64 FR 49084, Sept. 10, 1999and T.D. ATF-463, 66 FR 42734, 42735, Aug. 15, 2001.

#### § 71.80 Applications.

In hearings on the contemplated disapproval of applications there may be incorporated in the record sufficient testimony, reports, affidavits and other documents to be considered only for the limited purpose of establishing probable cause for the issuance of the notice of contemplated disapproval by showing that the appropriate TTB officer had reason to believe that the applicant is not entitled to a permit. The burden of proof shall be upon the applicant to produce evidence to show he is entitled to a permit. The appropriate TTB officer may, instead of following the aforementioned procedure, assume the burden of going forward.

[21 FR 1441, Mar. 6, 1956. Redesignated at 40 FR 16835, Apr. 15, 1975, and amended by T.D. ATF-199, 50 FR 9197, Mar. 6, 1985; T.D. ATF-374, 61 FR 29957, June 13, 1996]
### §925A. Remedy for erroneous denial of firearm

Any person denied a firearm pursuant to subsection (s) or (t) of section 922—

(1) due to the provision of erroneous information relating to the person by any State or political subdivision thereof, or by the national instant criminal background check system established under section 103 of the Brady Handgun Violence Prevention Act; or

(2) who was not prohibited from receipt of a firearm pursuant to subsection (g) or (n) of section 922,

may bring an action against the State or political subdivision responsible for providing the erroneous information, or responsible for denying the transfer, or against the United States, as the case may be, for an order directing that the erroneous information be corrected or that the transfer be approved, as the case may be. In any action under this section, the court, in its discretion, may allow the prevailing party a reasonable attorney's fee as part of the costs.

(Added Pub. L. 103–159, title I, §104(a), Nov. 30, 1993, 107 Stat. 1543.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

Section 103 of the Brady Handgun Violence Prevention Act, referred to in par. (1), is section 103 of Pub. L. 103–159, which is classified to section 40901 of Title 34, Crime Control and Law Enforcement.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

DAY ELEV

 122.20

 122.36

 123.32

 124.27

 122.50

 123.61

 124.23

 122.98

 122.89

 122.60

 122.38

 122.31

 122.25

 121.73

 122.24

 122.28

 122.19

 122.61

 122.26

 122.88

 123.03

 122.70

 122.51

 123.21

 123.47

 123.48

 123.37

 123.23

 123.82

 123.27

 7,431

 7,503

 7,941

 8,396

 7,566

 8,078

 8,376

 7,782

 7,742

 7,611

 7,512

 7,481

 7,454

 7,228

 7,449

 7,467

 7,427

 7,616

 7,458

 7,737

 7,805

 7,656

 7,571

 7,890

 8,012

 8,017

 7,965

 7,899

 8,176

 7,918

STORAGE

+132

+72

+438

+455

-830

+512

+298

-594

-40

-131

-99

-31

-27

-226

+221

+18

-40

+189

-158

+279

+68

-149

-85

+319

+122

+5

-52

-66

+277

-258

CHANGE

625

535

781

789

141

817

711

236

511

502

542

562

557

458

673

566

555

677

503

701

672

1,479

1,520

1,682

960

843

812

806

980

712

INFLOW

 468

 409

 470

 469

 469

 468

 469

 468

 469

 501

 500

 486

 479

 480

 470

 465

 483

 490

 491

 468

 546

 1,462

 1,455

 1,429

 808

 748

 747

 748

 748

 750

POWER

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 16

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

SPILL

 60

 60

 60

 60

 60

 60

 60

 60

 60

 60

 60

 60

 60

 60

 60

 60

 60

 60

 60

 60

 60

 60

 60

 60

 60

 60

 60

 60

 60

 60

HATCHERY

 0

 0

 0

 1

 0

 1

 2

 2

 2

 2

 2

 2

 2

 2

 2

 2

 2

 2

 2

 2

 2

 2

 2

 2

 0

 2

 1

 1

 2

 2

C.F.S.

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

APRIL 2014 LAKE NATOMA DAILY OPERATIONS RUN DATE: May 1, 2014

IN LAKE

EVAP

C.F.S.

COMPUTED*

ACRE-FEET

RELEASE - C.F.S.

TOTALS +619 21,908 18,913 16 1,800 46

ACRE-FEET +619 43,455 37,514 32 3,570 91

COMMENTS:

* COMPUTED INFLOW IS THE SUM OF CHANGE IN STORAGE, RELEASES AND EVAPORATION.

SUMMARY

RELEASES (ACRE-FEET)

POWER 37,514

SPILL 32

FOLSOM SOUTH CANAL

HATCHERY

 1,626

 3,570

 7,299

FOLSOM

SOUTH 

CANAL

 30

 30

 30

 30

 30

 30

 30

 5

 0

 5

 30

 30

 30

 30

 30

 30

 30

 30

 30

 30

 30

 30

 30

 30

 30

 30

 30

 30

 30

 30

 820

 1,626

(1)

(1) INCHES OF EVAPORATION TAKEN FROM FOLSOM PAN.

RELEASES (ACRE-FEET)

TOTAL 42,742
EXHIBIT 12(b)

FORM 10-Q

PACCAR FINANCIAL CORP.

COMPUTATION OF RATIO OF EARNINGS TO FIXED CHARGES

PURSUANT TO THE SUPPORT AGREEMENT

BETWEEN THE COMPANY AND PACCAR

(Millions of Dollars)



|                                   |  |                             |       |      |   |      
|---------------------------------- |  | --------------------------- | ----- | ---- | - | -----
|                                   |  | Three months 
endedMarch 31
|                                   |  | 2010                        |       | 2009
|FIXED CHARGES                      |  |                             |       |      |   |      
|Interest expense                   |  | $                           | 24.9  |      | $ | 34.2 
|Facility and equipment rental      |  |                             | .5    |      |   | .5   
|                                   |  |                             |       |      |   |      
|                                   |  |                             |       |      |   |      
|TOTAL FIXED CHARGES                |  | $                           | 25.4  |      | $ | 34.7 
|                                   |  |                             |       |      |   |      
|                                   |  |                             |       |      |   |      
|EARNINGS                           |  |                             |       |      |   |      
|Income before taxes                |  | $                           | 8.0   |      | $ | 17.3 
|Depreciation                       |  |                             | 37.1  |      |   | 29.4 
|                                   |  |                             |       |      |   |      
|                                   |  |                             | 45.1  |      |   | 46.7 
|                                   |  |                             |       |      |   |      
|FIXED CHARGES                      |  |                             | 25.4  |      |   | 34.7 
|                                   |  |                             |       |      |   |      
|                                   |  |                             |       |      |   |      
|EARNINGS AS DEFINED                |  | $                           | 70.5  |      | $ | 81.4 
|                                   |  |                             |       |      |   |      
|                                   |  |                             |       |      |   |      
|RATIO OF EARNINGS TO FIXED CHARGES |  |                             | 2.78X |      |   | 2.35X
|                                   |  |                             |       |      |   |
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM 3RD QUARTER
1997 10 QSB AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH 10 QSB.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JUL-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1997
<CASH>                                           7,675
<SECURITIES>                                    44,738
<RECEIVABLES>                                  117,834
<ALLOWANCES>                                       924
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               169,323
<PP&E>                                           5,601
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 174,924
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          153,178
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         1,728
<OTHER-SE>                                      20,018
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   174,924
<SALES>                                          9,318
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 9,860
<CGS>                                            4,434
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    7,773
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                    45
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  2,042
<INCOME-TAX>                                       548
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              1,494
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     1,494
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     1.08
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.08
        

</TABLE>
§ 771.3 Forms prescribed. ( a ) The Director is authorized to prescribe all forms required by this part. All of the information called for in each form shall be furnished as indicated by the headings on the form and the instructions on or pertaining to the form. In addition, information called for in each form shall be furnished as required by this part.
( b ) Requests for forms should be made to the ATF Distribution Center or through the ATF website at *http://www.atf.gov*.
##### 



Exhibit 32.2 Certification of Chief Financial Officer
Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as Adopted
Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 I, Randall D. Levy, Chief Financial Officer of Temple-Inland
Inc., hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q fully complies with
the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained in this
Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
Temple-Inland Inc. /S/ Randall D. LevyRandall D. LevyMay 10, 2005 46
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent *

except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision **

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

AH/Research

NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

 FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

RONALD O. HAYNES,

 Petitioner - Appellant,

 v.

JAMES VALADEZ, Warden,

 Respondent - Appellee.

No. 06-16642

D.C. No. CV-02-02686-FCD

MEMORANDUM *

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Eastern District of California

Frank C. Damrell, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted March 16, 2010** 

Before: SCHROEDER, PREGERSON, and RAWLINSON, Circuit Judges.

California state prisoner Ronald O. Haynes appeals pro se from the district

court’s judgment denying his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 habeas petition. We have

jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2253, and we affirm.

FILED

MAR 26 2010

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
AH/Research 06-16642

Haynes contends that the Board of Prison Terms (“Board”) violated his

rights to equal protection and due process when it failed to give him a parole

release date. The state court’s decision denying Haynes’ claims was neither

contrary to, nor involved an unreasonable application of, clearly established

Supreme Court law. See 28 U.S.C. § 2254(d)(1); see also Estelle v. McGuire, 502

U.S. 61, 67-68 (1991).

Haynes next contends that the Board’s failure to set a fixed sentence term

constitutes cruel and unusual punishment in violation of the Eighth Amendment.

Haynes is not entitled to habeas relief on this claim because Haynes failed to

demonstrate that his sentence of seven-years-to-life is grossly disproportionate to

his two first-degree murder and two kidnapping offenses. See Lockyer v. Andrade,

538 U.S. 63, 72 (2003).

Haynes last contends that a parole regulation was retroactively applied in

violation of the Ex Post Facto Clause. Haynes is not entitled to habeas relief on

this claim. See Smith v. United States Parole Comm’n, 875 F.2d 1361, 1367 (9th

Cir. 1989) (rejecting petitioner’s claim because parole guidelines are not “laws” for

purposes of the Ex Post Facto Clause).

AFFIRMED.
#### Sam Scarnato, Respondent-Appellant, v. State of New York, Appellant-Respondent.

(Claim No. 28192.)

— This matter first came before this court on an appeal from a judgment of the Court of Claims in favor cf the State of New York which dismissed claimant’s claim. The judgment was reversed (272 App. Div. 1085) with a statement as follows: “The Court adopts the determination of the Court of Claims insofar as claimant’s requests to find are found by the Court of Claims, and further makes the findings requested by claimant-in his requests to find and which were refused by the Court of Claims, except as to the amount of damages claimed by claimant.” And the matter was remitted to the Court of Claims for the fixing of damages. The Court of Claims awarded claimant a judgment for $50,000 against the State of New York. By error, as we now determine, findings of fact Nos. 81, 82, 83, 84 and 85, which involved damages, were included in the order of this court. These findings are now excluded and the same are deleted from the judgment of reversal earlier entered. In the interests of time and to obviate the necessity of further appeals the court now modifies its earlier decision, on the law and facts, and fixes the damages suffered by claimant at the sum of $25,000. The court makes the following finding of fact: Claimant suffered damages through the negligence of the State of New York as appears in the findings herein in the sum of $25,000. Judgment of the Court of Claims modified on the law and facts by granting claimant a judgment for $25,000 against the State of New York, and as so modified, affirmed, without costs. Hill, P. J., Heffernan, Brewster,.Foster and Bussell, JJ., concur.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

DAY HIGH

 238

 244

 248

 298

 287

 287

 224

 257

 269

 269

 245

 266

 285

 212

 206

 204

 224

 213

 199

 188

 195

 200

 192

 172

 219

 222

 181

 179

 202

 177

 204

 222

 210

 243

 245

 223

 201

 225

 217

 208

 213

 221

 206

 188

 174

 181

 175

 181

 168

 166

 166

 159

 163

 152

 149

 162

 153

 130

 134

 119

 224

 234

 224

 267

 263

 248

 212

 240

 234

 230

 229

 238

 243

 200

 192

 195

 200

 198

 185

 176

 175

 175

 171

 162

 175

 187

 165

 154

 157

 144

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

APRIL 2017 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: May 3, 2017

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

DELTA MENDOTA CANAL AT CHECK 13 (O'NEILL)
### §6031. Repealed. Pub. L. 107–279, title IV, §403(2), Nov. 5, 2002, 116 Stat. 1985

Section, Pub. L. 103–227, title IX, §931, Mar. 31, 1994, 108 Stat. 227, established the National Institute on Student Achievement, Curriculum, and Assessment, the National Institute on the Education of At-Risk Students, the National Institute on Educational Governance, Finance, Policy-Making, and Management, the National Institute on Early Childhood Development and Education, and the National Institute on Postsecondary Education, Libraries, and Lifelong Education.
Exhibit 32.2

                   SECTION 906 CERTIFICATION BY JAMES G. PRATT

Pursuant to the requirements of Section 906 of the Sarbannes-Oxley Act of 2002,
James G. Pratt hereby certifies that:

1. This report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the 1934 Act, and

2. The information contained in this report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the registrant's financial condition and results of operations of the
registrant.


Date 11/10/03                 By /s/ James G. Pratt
                                     James G. Pratt, Treasurer and
                                     Chief Accounting Officer

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to Hills Bancorporation and will be retained by Hills Bancorporation
and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
request.


                                       24