alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
### §3425. Office of Educational Technology

#### (a) Establishment

There shall be in the Department of Education an Office of Educational Technology (hereafter in this section referred to as the "Office"), to be administered by the Director of Educational Technology. The Director of Educational Technology shall report directly to the Secretary and shall perform such additional functions as the Secretary may prescribe.

#### (b) Director

The Director of the Office of Educational Technology (hereafter in this section referred to as the "Director"), through the Office, shall—

(1) in support of the overall national technology policy and in consultation with other Federal departments or agencies which the Director determines appropriate, provide leadership to the Nation in the use of technology to promote achievement of the National Education Goals and to increase opportunities for all students to achieve State content and challenging State student performance standards;

(2) review all programs and training functions administered by the Department and recommend policies in order to promote increased use of technology and technology planning throughout all such programs and functions;

(3) review all relevant programs supported by the Department to ensure that such programs are coordinated with and support the national long-range technology plan developed pursuant to section 5862(b) 1 of this title; and

(4) perform such additional functions as the Secretary may require.

#### (c) Officers and employees

The Director is authorized to select, appoint, and employ such officers and employees as may be necessary to carry out the functions of the Office, subject to the provisions of title 5 (governing appointments in the competitive service), and the provisions of chapter 51 and subchapter III of chapter 53 of such title (relating to classification and General Schedule pay rates).

#### (d) Experts and consultants

The Secretary may obtain the services of experts and consultants in accordance with section 3109 of title 5.

(Pub. L. 96–88, title II, §218, formerly §216, as added Pub. L. 103–227, title II, §233(a), Mar. 31, 1994, 108 Stat. 154; renumbered §218, Pub. L. 107–110, title X, §1072(e)(3), Jan. 8, 2002, 115 Stat. 2090.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

Section 5862 of this title, referred to in subsec. (b)(3), was repealed by Pub. L. 103–382, title III, §361(a), Oct. 20, 1994, 108 Stat. 3974.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Transfer of Office of Training Technology Transfer

Pub. L. 103–227, title II, §236(a)(1), Mar. 31, 1994, 108 Stat. 156, provided that: "The Office of Training Technology Transfer as established under section 6103 of the Training Technology Transfer Act of 1988 ([former] 20 U.S.C. 5093) is transferred to and established in the Office of Educational Technology."

1 See References in Text note below.
STORAGE - A.F. RESERVOIR CHANGE NEW MELONES NATURAL ACCUM * FULL

Day DONNELLS

RESERVOIR

BEARDSLEY

RESERVOIR

TOTAL A.F. C.F.S. INFLOW C.F.S RIVER C.F.S NATURAL 

1000 A.F.

1 20,518 78,292 98,810 -1,099 -554 2,103 1,549 441.6

2 19,408 78,292 97,700 -1,110 -560 2,271 1,711 445.0

3 18,717 78,087 96,804 -896 -452 2,240 1,788 448.5

4 17,850 78,206 96,056 -748 -377 2,220 1,843 452.2

5 17,399 78,200 95,599 -457 -230 2,881 2,651 457.4

6 16,859 78,127 94,986 -613 -309 2,532 2,223 461.8

7 16,255 78,094 94,349 -637 -321 2,603 2,282 466.4

8 15,681 78,061 93,742 -607 -306 2,309 2,003 470.3

9 14,909 78,140 93,049 -693 -349 2,212 1,863 474.0

10 14,394 78,081 92,475 -574 -289 2,317 2,028 478.1

11 14,331 77,844 92,175 -300 -151 2,139 1,988 482.0

12 14,375 77,549 91,924 -251 -127 2,051 1,924 485.8

13 14,454 77,254 91,708 -216 -109 2,042 1,933 489.6

14 14,084 77,444 91,528 -180 -91 1,872 1,781 493.2

15 13,589 77,562 91,151 -377 -190 1,899 1,709 496.6

16 12,720 78,028 90,748 -403 -203 1,886 1,683 499.9

17 11,709 78,206 89,915 -833 -420 1,977 1,557 503.0

18 10,964 78,114 89,078 -837 -422 1,964 1,542 506.1

19 10,322 78,009 88,331 -747 -377 1,933 1,556 509.1

20 10,293 77,562 87,855 -476 -240 1,968 1,728 512.6

21 10,452 77,064 87,516 -339 -171 1,770 1,599 515.7

22 10,522 76,607 87,129 -387 -195 1,922 1,727 519.2

23 10,486 76,249 86,735 -394 -199 1,892 1,693 522.5

24 10,327 76,034 86,361 -374 -189 2,259 2,070 526.6

25 10,395 75,560 85,955 -406 -205 2,027 1,822 530.2

26 10,278 75,216 85,494 -461 -232 2,117 1,885 534.0

27 10,285 74,802 85,087 -407 -205 3,123 2,918 539.8

28 10,285 74,196 84,481 -606 -306 3,357 3,051 545.8

Totals -15,428 54,107

Acre - Feet 107,321

* October 1, 2022 to date

Historical Archive and Report Database

Full Natural Flow At New Melones Dam

 February 2023 

 Run Date: 3/29/2023
#### § 10.3 Have the collection of information requirements of this part been approved by the Office of Management and Budget (OMB)?

The collection of information requirements in this part have been approved by OMB and assigned OMB control numbers 1240-0001, 1240-0007, 1240-0008, 1240-0009, 1240-0012, 1240-0013, 1240-0015, 1240-0016, 1240-0017, 1240-0018, 1240-0019, 1240-0022, 1240-0044, 1240-0045, 1240-0046, 1240-0047, 1240-0049, 1240-0050 and 1240-0051.
### §241c. Repealed. Pub. L. 95–561, title I, §101(c), Nov. 1, 1978, 92 Stat. 2200

Section, act Sept. 30, 1950, ch. 1124, title II, §103, formerly §203, as added Apr. 11, 1965, Pub. L. 89–10, title I, §2, 79 Stat. 28, amended July 21, 1965, Pub. L. 89–77, §3, 79 Stat. 243; Nov. 1, 1965, Pub. L. 89–313, §6(a), 79 Stat. 1161; Nov. 3, 1966, Pub. L. 89–750, title I, §§102, 103(a), 104, 105(a), (b)(1), (2), (c), 106, 107, 108(b)(1), 113(b), 117(a)(2), (3), 80 Stat. 1191–1195, 1197, 1198, and renumbered and amended Jan. 2, 1968, Pub. L. 90–247, title I, §§101, 103(a), 104(a), (b), 105, 107(a), 108(a)(2), 110, 81 Stat. 783–787; Oct. 16, 1968, Pub. L. 90–576, title III, §307, 82 Stat. 1097; Apr. 13, 1970, Pub. L. 91–230, title I, §§101(b), 103, 104(a), 105(a), (b), 106, 107, 113(a), 84 Stat. 121–124, 126; June 23, 1972, Pub. L. 92–318, title IV, §411(b)(1), (2), title V, §508, 86 Stat. 338, 352; Aug. 21, 1974, Pub. L. 93–380, title I, §101(a)(2)(A)(i)(II), (ii), (B)–(D), 88 Stat. 488, 490, 491; Apr. 21, 1976, Pub. L. 94–273, §49(a)–(c), 90 Stat. 382, authorized grants to local educational agencies.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date of Repeal

Repeal effective Oct. 1, 1978, see section 1530(a) of Pub. L. 95–561, set out as an Effective Date of 1978 Amendment note under section 1221e–3 of this title.
EXHIBIT 32.1


                    CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
                                   PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

      In  connection  with the Annual Report of Advanced  Biotherapy,  Inc. (the
"Company")  on Form 10-KSB for the year ended  December 31, 2003,  as filed with
the  Securities  and  Exchange  Commission  on the date  hereof  (the  "Periodic
Report"), I, Edmond F. Buccellato,  President and Chief Executive Officer of the
Company,  certify,  pursuant to 18 U.S.C.  Section 1350, as adopted  pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

      1.    the Periodic Report fully complies with the  requirements of Section
            13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      2.    the information contained in the Periodic Report fairly presents, in
            all  material  respects,  the  financial  condition  and  results of
            operations of the Company.

Dated:     March 25, 2004                   /s/Edmond F. Buccellato
                                            -----------------------------------
                                            Edmond F. Buccellato, President and
                                            Chief Executive Officer
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

DAY ELEV

 868.12

 867.69

 867.26

 866.98

 866.59

 866.26

 866.16

 865.78

 865.42

 865.12

 864.79

 864.55

 864.30

 864.25

 863.97

 863.74

 863.52

 863.32

 862.99

 862.76

 862.69

 862.38

 862.14

 861.88

 861.85

 861.81

 861.71

 861.84

 861.79

 861.78

 550.6

 548.5

 546.4

 545.0

 543.1

 541.4

 540.9

 539.1

 537.3

 535.9

 534.2

 533.1

 531.9

 531.6

 530.3

 529.2

 528.1

 527.1

 525.5

 524.4

 524.1

 522.6

 521.4

 520.2

 520.1

 519.9

 519.4

 520.0

 519.8

 519.7

STORAGE

-2.9

-2.1

-2.1

-1.4

-1.9

-1.6

-0.5

-1.9

-1.8

-1.5

-1.6

-1.2

-1.2

-0.2

-1.4

-1.1

-1.1

-1.0

-1.6

-1.1

-0.3

-1.5

-1.2

-1.2

-0.1

-0.2

-0.5

+0.6

-0.2

+0.0

CHANGE

448

397

366

359

366

385

339

343

385

421

439

417

378

423

397

424

414

417

330

340

381

424

432

403

355

322

318

371

312

417

INFLOW

 1,842

 1,396

 1,375

 994

 1,270

 1,146

 530

 1,219

 1,218

 1,102

 1,189

 948

 933

 474

 1,027

 920

 903

 853

 1,089

 853

 480

 1,133

 977

 988

 375

 418

 545

 35

 413

 413

POWER

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

SPILL

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

OUTLET

 59

 74

 62

 62

 62

 57

 57

 62

 54

 58

 60

 57

 58

 71

 56

 64

 47

 52

 45

 44

 70

 42

 36

 43

 53

 0

 14

 22

 19

 28

C.F.S.

 .37

 .46

 .39

 .39

 .39

 .36

 .36

 .39

 .34

 .37

 .38

 .36

 .37

 .45

 .36

 .41

 .30

 .33

 .29

 .28

 .45

 .27

 .23

 .28

 .34

 .00

 .09

 .14

 .12

 .18

INCHES

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .24

 .23

 .04

 .00

 .00

PRECIP

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

SEPTEMBER 2014 NEW MELONES LAKE DAILY OPERATIONS RUN DATE: October 10, 2014

IN LAKE

EVAPORATION

INCHES

C.F.S.

COMPUTED*

1000 ACRE-FEET

RELEASE - C.F.S.

TOTALS -33.8 11,523 27,058 0 0 1,488 9.45 .51

ACRE-FEET -33,800 22,856 53,670 0 0 2,951

COMMENTS:

* COMPUTED INFLOW IS THE SUM OF CHANGE IN STORAGE, RELEASES AND EVAPORATION.

SUMMARY

RELEASE (ACRE-FEET)

POWER 53,670

SPILL 0

OUTLET

TOTAL

 0

 53,670

PRECIPITATION

THIS MONTH =

TO DATE =

 .51

JULY 1, 2014 .52

 553.5

Table 13
### §§331 to 332b. Omitted

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Sections constituted the Cooperative Research Act and terminated on and after July 1, 1975, under provisions of section 402(c)(1) of Pub. L. 93–380. See provisions of Special Projects Act, section 1851 et seq. of this title.

Section 331, acts July 26, 1954, ch. 576, §1, 68 Stat. 533; Apr. 11, 1965, Pub. L. 89–10, title IV, §401, 79 Stat. 44, related to Congressional declaration of purpose.

Section 331a, act July 26, 1954, ch. 576, §2, as added Apr. 11, 1965, Pub. L. 89–10, title IV, §401, 79 Stat. 44; amended Nov. 3, 1966, Pub. L. 89–750, title I, §141, 80 Stat. 1202; Jan. 2, 1968, Pub. L. 90–247, title VII, §706, 81 Stat. 820; Apr. 13, 1970, Pub. L. 91–230, title I, §143(c), title VIII, §§808, 809(c), 84 Stat. 151, 193, 194; June 23, 1972, Pub. L. 92–318, title III, §303(a)(1), 86 Stat. 333, authorized grants, contracts, and jointly financed arrangements for exemplary projects and management studies, provided for an annual report to Congress, and provided for establishment of an Advisory Council on Research and development, its membership, and appointment of a Chairman.

Section 332, act July 26, 1954, ch. 576, §3, formerly §2, 68 Stat. 533, renumbered and amended Apr. 11, 1965, Pub. L. 89–10, title IV, §§401, 402, 79 Stat. 44, 46; June 23, 1972, Pub. L. 92–318, title III, §303(a)(2), 86 Stat. 333, authorized appropriations for fiscal years ending June 30, 1973, 1974, and 1975 of $58,000,000; $68,000,000; and $78,000,000 respectively.

Section 332a, act July 26, 1954, ch. 576, §4, as added Apr. 11, 1965, Pub. L. 89–10, title IV, §403, 79 Stat. 46; amended Nov. 3, 1966, Pub. L. 89–750, title I, §142, 80 Stat. 1203; Apr. 13, 1970, Pub. L. 91–230, title IV, §401(g)(2), title VIII, §810, 84 Stat. 174, 194, related to construction of regional facilities, authorizing appropriation of $100,000,000 in the aggregate for fiscal years ending June 30, 1966, through 1970, in subsec. (a); subsec. (b) relating to findings of Commissioner, grants for construction, transfer of title, and operation of facility; subsec. (c), as originally enacted, relating to labor standards; subsec. (d) relating to methods of payment, and subsec. (e) defining "research and related purposes".

Section 332b, act July 26, 1954, ch. 576, §5, as added Apr. 11, 1965, Pub. L. 89–10, title IV, §403, 79 Stat. 47; amended Nov. 3, 1966, Pub. L. 89–750, title I, §143, 80 Stat. 1203, provided for definitions of "State", "State educational agency", "nonprofit", and "construction" and "cost of construction".
United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

_____________ No. 97-1815MN

_____________ Thomas Louis Smykalski, * * Appellant, *

* Appeal from the United States v. * District Court for the District * of Minnesota. Lou Stender, Warden of Minnesota * Correctional Facility, Faribault, * [UNPUBLISHED] * Appellee. *

_____________ Submitted: October 20, 1997

Filed: October 30, 1997

_____________ Before FAGG, WOLLMAN, and MORRIS SHEPPARD ARNOLD, Circuit Judges.

_____________ PER CURIAM. Thomas L ouis Smykalski appeals the district court's denial of Smykalski's 2 8 U.S.C. § 2254 petition for writ of habeas corpus. Having considered the record an d the parties' briefs, we agree with the district court that Smykalski failed to satisfy the prejudice requirement set forth in Strickland v. Washin gton , 466 U.S. 668, 694 (1984). Spec ifically, Smykalski failed to show there was a reasonable probability he woul d have acknowledged his guilt and accepted a plea offer had he been properly advised about the risks of trial. See Engelen v. United States , 68 F.3d 238, 241 (8th Cir. 1995). Alternatively, Smykalski invites this panel to relieve Smykalski of his burden to-2-

establish prejudice and to reinstate the cumulative error test in this circuit. Contrary to Smykalski's view, we are not at liberty to mo dify the Stricklanddecision. Likewise, we are not p ermitted to alter the holding of another panel of this court about th e cumulative impact of an attorney's errors. See Girtman v. Lockhart , 942 F .2d 468, 474- 75 (8th Cir. 199 1). We also decline to consider arguments raised for the first time on appeal. The district court correctly denied Smykalski relief and further discussion is not warranted. We affirm. See 8th Cir. R. 47B. A true copy.
Attest: CLERK, U.S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.
#### Marshall WELLS, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Jackie EDWARDS, Warden of Ramsey III; Unknown Regional Directors at Darrington Unit 59; Prige Jack, Grievance Coordinator of Ramsey III Unit; Susan Rivas; Carolyn C. Fields, Supervisor of the Mailroom at Ramsey III Unit; Regina Higgins, Clerk of Ramsey III Mailroom; Anton Powell, Clerk of Ramsey III Mailroom; Sheki Murphy, Clerk of Ramsey III Mailroom, Defendants-Appellees.

*344No. 05-41846

Conference Calendar.

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.

June 21, 2006.

Marshall Wells, Houston, TX, pro se.

Before STEWART, DENNIS, and OWEN, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: *

Marshall Wells, Texas prisoner # 314821, appeals from the district court’s dismissal of his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint as time-barred pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(b)(l). Wells concedes that he previously filed the same complaint against the same defendants and that it was voluntarily dismissed pursuant to his “Notice of Dismissal” filed on August 19, 2003. Wells also concedes that his cause of action arose when he received the final response to his Step Two Grievance in 1999. *See Jackson v. Johnson,*950 F.2d 263, 265 (5th Cir. 1992). The applicable statute of limitations is two years. *See Hitt v. Connell,*301 F.3d 240, 246 (5th Cir.2002). Wells’s voluntary dismissal of that complaint left him in the same position as if the lawsuit had never been filed. *Lambert v. United States,*44 F.3d 296, 298 (5th Cir.1995). Equitable tolling is not warranted in this case because Wells failed to act diligently to preserve his claims. *See id.*at 299 *&*n. 1. Wells’s complaint filed in September 2005 was therefore untimely.

AFFIRMED.

*

 Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.
1 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF IDAHO

Docket No. 44251

STATE OF IDAHO

,

Plaintiff

- Respondent

,

v.

AERRIAL LUNA

,

Defendant

- Appellant

. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) 2016 Unpublished Opinion No. 778

Filed: November 16, 2016

Stephen W. Kenyon, Clerk

THIS IS AN UNPUBLISHED

OPINION AND SHALL NOT

BE CITED AS AUTHORITY

Appeal from the District Court of the Fourth Judicial District, State of Idaho, Ada County. Hon. Deborah A. Bail , District Judge.

Judgment of conviction and unified sentence of six years, with a minimum period

of confinement of two years, for felony burglary, affirmed

.

Eric D. Fredericksen, Interim State Appellate Public Defender; Ben P. McGreevy

, Deputy Appellate Public Defender, Boise, for appellant.

Hon. Lawrence G. Wasden, Attorney General; Lori A. Fleming , Deputy Attorney General, Boise, for respondent.

________________________________________________

Before MELAN SON, Chief Judge; GUTIERREZ, Judge; and HUSKEY, Judge

________________________________________________

PER CURIAM

Aerrial Luna pled guilty to felony burglary, Idaho Code § 18

- 1401. The district court

imposed a unified sentence of six years, with a minimum period of confinement of two years

, suspended the sentence and placed Luna on probation. Luna subsequently admitted to two

reports of probation violations, and the district court revoked probation and executed the

underlying sentence. Luna appeals, contending that the district court erred in failing to retain

jurisdiction.

The primary purpose of the retained jurisdiction program is to enable the trial court to

obtain additional information regarding the defe ndant’s rehabilitative potential and suitability for2 probation, and probation is the ultimate objective of a defendant who is on retained jurisdiction.

State v. Chapel , 107 Idaho 193, 687 P.2d 583 (Ct. App. 1984); State v. Toohill , 103 Idaho 565,

567, 650 P.2d 707, 709 (Ct. App. 1982). There can be no abuse of discretion in a trial court’s

refusal to retain jurisdiction if the court already has sufficient information upon which to

conclude that the defendant is not a suitable candidate for probation. Sta te v. Beebe , 113 Idaho

977, 979, 751 P.2d 673, 675 (Ct. App. 1988); Toohill , 103 Idaho at 567, 650 P.2d at 709. Based

upon the information that was before the district court at the time of sentencing, we hold that the

district court did not abuse its disc retion when it declined to retain jurisdiction in this case.

Therefore, Luna’s judgment of conviction and sentence are affirmed.
### §124. Transfer of Freedmen's Hospital to Howard University

#### (a) Purpose; authorization; agreement

For the purpose of assisting in the provision of teaching hospital resources for Howard University, thereby assisting the university in the training of medical and allied personnel and in providing hospital services for the community, the Secretary of Health, Education, and Welfare shall, pursuant to agreement with the board of trustees of Howard University, transfer to Howard University, without reimbursement, all right, title, and interest of the United States in certain lands in the District of Columbia, together with the buildings and improvements thereon and the personal property used in connection therewith (as determined by the Secretary), commonly known as Freedmen's Hospital.

#### (b) Congressional intent

It is the intent of Congress (1) that the transfer of Freedmen's Hospital to Howard University be effected as soon as practicable, (2) to assure the well-being of patients at Freedmen's Hospital during the period of transition, and (3) that the transfer be effected with minimum dislocation of the present hospital staff and maximum consideration of their interests as employees.

#### (c) Report to Congress

The Secretary of Health, Education, and Welfare shall report to the Congress the terms of the agreement for such transfer.

(Pub. L. 87–262, §1, Sept. 21, 1961, 75 Stat. 542.)

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Transfer of Functions

Functions of Secretary of Health, Education, and Welfare under laws relating to relationship between Howard University and Department of Health, Education, and Welfare transferred to Secretary of Education by section 3441(a)(2)(M) of this title.

#### Repeal of Laws Applicable to Freedmen's Hospital

Pub. L. 87–262, §7, Sept. 21, 1961, 75 Stat. 544, provided that: "All laws heretofore applicable specifically to Freedmen's Hospital are, to the extent of such applicability, repealed, effective with the transfer of Freedmen's Hospital pursuant to section 1 [this section]."

#### Transfer of Funds

Pub. L. 87–262, §8, Sept. 21, 1961, 75 Stat. 544, provided that: "All unexpended balances of appropriations, allocations, and other funds, available or to be made available, of Freedmen's Hospital are, effective with the transfer of Freedmen's Hospital pursuant to section 1 [this section], transferred to Howard University for use in the operation of the Howard University Hospital facilities, except to the extent (determined by the Director of the Bureau of the Budget [Director of the Office of Management and Budget]) required to meet obligations already incurred and not assumed by the university."
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1996
<CASH>                                         406,296
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  279,888
<ALLOWANCES>                                     5,227
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               557,271
<PP&E>                                          81,094
<DEPRECIATION>                                   9,468
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,039,109
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          136,897
<BONDS>                                              0
<COMMON>                                     1,281,573
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 1,039,109
<SALES>                                        416,597
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               441,967
<CGS>                                          262,250
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               264,464
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               3,777
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 88,524
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (88,524)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (88,524)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (.009)
        

</TABLE>