alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### UNITED STATES of America ex rel. Charles E. LYLE v. Hon. Judge Edward CARNEY, President Judge of Erie County, Erie County, Pennsylvania, and District Attorney Richard Brabender, District Attorney of Erie County, Erie County, Pennsylvania.

Civ. A. No. 67-1357.

United States District Court W. D. Pennsylvania.

Nov. 28, 1967.

*251Charles E. Lyle, pro se.

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

MARSH, District Judge.

The relator, Charles E. Lyle, has filed his eleventh proceeding in this court,1 all related to his incarceration. Several of these proceedings are applications for a writ of habeas corpus, in which the party holding him in custody is named as a respondent. The present application for habeas corpus names as respondents “Hon. Judge Edward Carney, President Judge of Erie County, Erie County, Pennsylvania” and “District Attorney Richard Brabender, District Attorney of Erie County, Erie County, Pennsylvania”; it does not name as respondent the party who has custody of the applicant’s person. For this reason the application for the writ must be dismissed. Section 2242, Title 28 U.S.C.A., provides that the application for the writ *shall allege the name of the person who has custody over the applicant.*Such failure is fatal to the right to a writ of habeas corpus. Gaito v. Strauss, 368 F. 2d 787, 788 (3d Cir. 1966); King v. State of California, 356 F.2d 950 (9th Cir. 1966); Morehead v. State of California, 339 F.2d 170 (9th Cir. 1964); Roseborough v. People of the State of California, 322 F.2d 788 (9th Cir. 1963).

In the caption of his application, the relator states: “Conspiring to defraud petitioner of his Civil Right”; *“Right to Appeal”.*He further states that his petition for the writ of habeas corpus is submitted, inter alia, under § 1443, Title 28 U.S.C.A., providing for removal of civil actions and criminal prosecutions commenced in a state court to a federal district court for the district wherein such action is pending. The relator’s petition does not disclose any such civil action or criminal prosecution pending in any state court in this district.

Furthermore, the relator may not remove a habeas corpus petition or a petition filed under the Pennsylvania Post Conviction Hearing Act to a federal district court. There is no basis in law for the removal of such proceedings which in substance and effect would make it serve as a procedure for review in lieu of Pennsylvania appellate tribunals. United States ex rel. Hamilton v. Maroney, 355 F.2d 441 (3d Cir. 1966).

Finally, it does not appear that the relator has appealed the denial of any of his state court petitions to the Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, and, therefore, he has not exhausted his state remedies. United States ex rel. Ackerman v. Johnston, 139 F.Supp. 890 (W.D. Pa.1955), aff’d 235 F.2d 958 (3d Cir. 1956).

An appropriate order will be entered.

1

. Miscellaneous No. 3673, Civil No. 65-1273, Civil No. 65-1307, United States ex rel. Lyle v. Maroney, D.C., 260 F. Supp. 689, Civil No. 66-618, Miscellaneous No. 4222, Miscellaneous No. 4242, Lyle v. Gernert, D.C., 263 F.Supp. 260, Miscellaneous No. 4274, and Civil No. 67-597.
(No. 6539

#### Martin Oil Service, Inc., Claimant, *vs.*State of Illinois, Secretary of State and Department of Transportation, Respondent.

*Opinion filed December 13, 1972.*

Martin Oil Service, Inc., Claimant, pro se.

William J. Scott, Attorney General; Saul R. Wexler, Assistant Attorney General, for Respondent.

Per Curiam.
**CERTIFICATE OF FORMATION****OF****FARMINGTON HEART & VASCULAR CENTER, LLC**     Pursuant to Section 18-201 of the Delaware Limited Liability Company Act (the “Act”), theundersigned, desiring to form a limited liability company, does hereby certify as follows:     1. The name of the limited liability company is FARMINGTON HEART & VASCULAR CENTER, LLC (the“Company”).     2. The address of its registered office in the State of Delaware is: Corporation Trust Center,1209 Orange Street, in the City of Wilmington, Delaware 19801. The name of its registered agent atsuch address is The Corporation Trust Company.     3. The Company shall have the power and authority to carry on any business permitted by, andto have and exercise all of the powers and rights conferred by, the Act as amended from time totime or any successor provisions thereto.     4. This Certificate of Formation shall be effective upon filing with the Delaware Secretary ofState.     IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has executed this Certificate of Formation on this31st day of August, 2009.                                              /s/ Howard T. Wall III   Howard T. Wall III, Authorized Person       *STATE OF DELAWARE*  *SECRETARY OF STATE*  *DIVISION OF CORPORATIONS*  *DELIVERED 05:49 PM 08/31/2009*  *FILED 05:06 PM 08/31/2009*  *SRV 090822858 — 4725968 FILE*
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

DAY ELEV

 1,044.86

 1,044.56

 1,044.30

 1,044.13

 1,043.93

 1,043.73

 1,043.59

 1,043.34

 1,043.19

 1,043.08

 1,042.96

 1,042.96

 1,042.72

 1,042.52

 1,042.38

 1,042.17

 1,041.98

 1,041.85

 1,041.68

 1,041.61

 1,041.42

 1,041.39

 1,041.32

 1,041.31

 1,041.34

 1,041.23

 1,041.35

 1,041.21

 1,041.07

 1,040.88

 1,919.0

 1,915.8

 1,913.0

 1,911.2

 1,909.0

 1,906.9

 1,905.4

 1,902.7

 1,901.1

 1,899.9

 1,898.6

 1,898.6

 1,896.0

 1,893.9

 1,892.4

 1,890.1

 1,888.1

 1,886.7

 1,884.9

 1,884.2

 1,882.1

 1,881.8

 1,881.1

 1,881.0

 1,881.3

 1,880.1

 1,881.4

 1,879.9

 1,878.4

 1,876.4

STORAGE

-1.5

-3.2

-2.8

-1.8

-2.2

-2.1

-1.5

-2.7

-1.6

-1.2

-1.3

+0.0

-2.6

-2.1

-1.5

-2.2

-2.0

-1.4

-1.8

-0.7

-2.0

-0.3

-0.7

-0.1

+0.3

-1.2

+1.3

-1.5

-1.5

-2.0

CHANGE

761

1,113

700

831

707

738

1,075

350

802

994

905

1,089

1,130

966

770

1,171

1,330

1,322

1,628

2,157

1,491

1,588

1,718

1,830

2,138

1,922

1,966

1,911

1,363

1,627

INFLOW

 1,463

 2,691

 2,071

 1,685

 1,754

 1,769

 1,781

 1,694

 1,587

 1,548

 1,502

 1,072

 2,409

 2,028

 1,464

 2,246

 2,289

 1,955

 2,498

 2,503

 2,465

 1,714

 2,036

 1,824

 1,894

 2,417

 1,230

 2,581

 2,030

 2,571

POWER

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

SPILL

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

OUTLET

 59

 52

 42

 70

 38

 52

 52

 10

 28

 42

 52

 17

 17

 17

 62

 59

 66

 66

 45

 31

 48

 35

 59

 59

 83

 97

 90

 83

 86

 76

C.F.S.

 .17

 .15

 .12

 .20

 .11

 .15

 .15

 .03

 .08

 .12

 .15

 .05

 .05

 .05

 .18

 .17

 .19

 .19

 .13

 .09

 .14

 .10

 .17

 .17

 .24

 .28

 .26

 .24

 .25

 .22

INCHES

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .92

 .13

 .00

 .00

 .02

 .12

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .32

 .59

 .80

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

PRECIP

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

APRIL 2001 NEW MELONES LAKE DAILY OPERATIONS RUN DATE: January 28, 2002

IN LAKE

EVAPORATION

INCHES

C.F.S.

COMPUTED*

1000 ACRE-FEET

RELEASE - C.F.S.

TOTALS -43.9 38,093 58,771 0 0 1,593 4.60 2.90

ACRE-FEET -43,900 75,557 116,572 0 0 3,160

COMMENTS:

* COMPUTED INFLOW IS THE SUM OF CHANGE IN STORAGE, RELEASES AND EVAPORATION.

SUMMARY

RELEASE (ACRE-FEET)

POWER 116,572

SPILL 0

OUTLET

TOTAL

 0

 116,572

PRECIPITATION

THIS MONTH =

TO DATE =

 2.90

JULY 1, 2000 23.31

 1,920.5
A-AA+Skip to content

                  - Home
                  - Compendium Statistics
                  - Event
                  - Archives
                  - Glossary
                  - Help
                  - Contact
                  - Research on Disability

Annual Disability Statistics Compendium

              - Home /
              - Archives /
              - 2012 Compendium Statistics /
              - 2012 Veterans /
              - 2012 6.2 Civilian Veterans Ages 18 Years and Over Living in the Community for the U.S. by Disability Status

## Table 6.2: Civilian Veterans Ages 18 Years and Over Living in the Community for the United States and States, by Disability Status: 2011

----

----

 

----

#### 2012 Disability Compendium

                        - Home
                        - Compendium Statistics                           - Population and Prevelance
                          - Employment
                          - Time Trend Population Statistics
                          - Poverty
                          - Earnings
                          - Veterans
                          - Health Insurance Coverage
                          - Health
                          - Social Security Administration Programs
                          - Medicaid and Medicare
                          - Special Education
                          - Vocational Rehabilitation
                          - Federal Government Spending and Employment
                          - International Disability Statistics
                          - Population Statistics: Disability Type
                        - Event
                        - Archives                           - 2012 Compendium Statistics
                        - Glossary
                        - Help
                        - Contact
                        - Research on Disability

#### Funding for this project is made possible by:

 The Research and Training Center on Disability Statistics and Demographics (StatsRRTC), which is funded by the U.S. Department of Education, National Institute for Disability and Rehabilitation Research, under cooperative agreements H133B080012.

#### Stay Connected

**Institute on Disability**10 West Edge Drive, Suite 101Durham, NH 03824603.862.4320 | relay: 711 | [email protected]www.iod.unh.edu

© 2013. Institute on Disability.University of New Hampshire.
§ 7.128 Claims related to distilled spirits. ( a ) *General.* Except as provided in paragraph (b) of this section, containers of malt beverages, or any labels on such containers, or any carton, case, or individual covering of such containers, used for sale at retail, or any written, printed, graphic, or other material accompanying such containers to the consumer, must not contain any statement, design, device, or representation that tends to create a false or misleading impression that the malt beverage contains distilled spirits or is a distilled spirits product.
( b ) *Exceptions.* This section does not prohibit: ( 1 ) A truthful and accurate statement of alcohol content, in conformity with § 7.65;
( 2 ) The use of a brand name of a distilled spirits product as a malt beverage brand name, provided that the overall label does not create a misleading impression as to the identity of the product;
( 3 ) The use of a cocktail name as a brand name or a distinctive or fanciful name of a malt beverage, provided that the overall labeling does not present a misleading impression about the identity of the product; or
( 4 ) The use of truthful and accurate statements about the production of the malt beverage as part of a statement of composition or otherwise, such as “aged in whisky barrels,” as long as such statements do not create a misleading impression as to the identity of the product.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Federal Retirement Thrift Investment Board

# TIME AND DATE:

 9 a.m. (Eastern Time) April 18, 2011. 

# PLACE:

 2nd Floor Training Room, 1250 H Street, NW., Washington, DC 20005. 

# STATUS:

 Parts will be open to the public and parts closed to the public. 

## Matters To Be Considered 

### Parts Open to the Public 

1. Approval of the minutes of the March 28, 2011 Board member meeting. 

2. Approval of the minutes of the October 19, 2009 ETAC meeting. 

3. Nomination(s) of ETAC Chairman and election of Vice Chairman. 

4. Thrift Savings Plan activity report by the Executive Director. 

 a. Monthly Participant Activity Report. 

 b. Monthly Investment Policy Report. 

 c. Legislative Report. 

5. Vendor Financial Review. 

6. Audit Report Discussion. 

7. Annual Financial Audit Report. 

### Parts Closed to the Public 

8. Confidential Financial Information. 

# CONTACT PERSON FOR MORE INFORMATION:

Thomas J. Trabucco, Director, Office of External Affairs, (202) 942-1640. 

Dated: April 8, 2011. 

Megan G. Grumbine, 

Acting Secretary, Federal Retirement Thrift Investment Board.

[FR Doc. 2011-8989 Filed 4-8-11; 4:15 pm] 

BILLING CODE 6760-01-P
(No. 5872

#### Licata Moving and Storage Company, Claimant, *vs.*State of Illinois, Department of Public Aid, Respondent.

*Opinion filed August 3, 1972.*

Licata Moving and Storage Company, Claimant, pro se.

William J. Scott, Attorney General; Saul R. Wexler, Assistant Attorney General, for Respondent.

Perlin, C.J.
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350  AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY OF 2002

In connection with the annual Report
of Americana Gold and Diamond Holdings, Inc., on Form 10-KSB for the year ended January
31 1998, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
Report), each of the undersigned, in the capacities and on the dates indicated
below, hereby certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section
906 of the Sarbannes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of his knowledge:

|1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13 (a) or
           15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|-- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

|2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
           respects, the financial condition and results of operation of the
          Company.
|-- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

|September 30, 2003 | /s/ David Bending 
David Bending
President
|------------------ | ------------------------------------------
*Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the Court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except

under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

_______________________

No. 97-30670

_______________________

CHARLES ROGERS, MD,

Plaintiff-Appellant and Cross-Appellee,

versus

COLUMBIA/HCA OF CENTRAL LOUISIANA,

INCORPORATED, D/B/A RAPIDIES REGIONAL

MEDICAL CENTER, ET AL.,

 Defendants,

COLUMBIA/HCA OF CENTRAL LOUISIANA,

INCORPORATED, D/B/A RAPIDIES REGIONAL

MEDICAL CENTER, ET. AL.,

Defendants-Appellees and Cross-Appellants.

_________________________________________________________________

Appeals from the United States District Court

for the Western District of Louisiana

(96-CV-2839)

_________________________________________________________________

March 25, 1998

Before REAVLEY, JONES, and BENAVIDES, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

The court has carefully considered this appeal in light

of the oral argument, briefs and pertinent portions of the record.

Having done so, we find, with one technical exception, that the
2

district court’s conscientious and careful disposition of this case

should be affirmed. The district court committed one small error,

in denying an award of costs other than attorneys’ fees to the

appellees as prevailing parties pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(d).

Accordingly, the judgment is AFFIRMED AS MODIFIED to tax

non-attorney costs against the appellant and in favor of appellees.

AFFIRMED AS MODIFIED.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

DAY ELEV

 124.04

 123.93

 124.07

 123.96

 123.26

 123.14

 122.87

 122.91

 123.02

 123.36

 123.70

 123.86

 124.01

 124.39

 123.46

 123.64

 124.11

 124.29

 124.48

 124.14

 123.85

 123.87

 123.15

 123.53

 123.69

 123.60

 123.58

 123.73

 123.67

 123.83

 8,281

 8,228

 8,296

 8,242

 7,913

 7,857

 7,733

 7,751

 7,800

 7,960

 8,120

 8,195

 8,266

 8,456

 8,007

 8,092

 8,316

 8,406

 8,501

 8,331

 8,191

 8,200

 7,862

 8,040

 8,115

 8,073

 8,064

 8,134

 8,106

 8,181

STORAGE

-65

-53

+68

-54

-329

-56

-124

+18

+49

+160

+160

+75

+71

+190

-449

+85

+224

+90

+95

-170

-140

+9

-338

+178

+75

-42

-9

+70

-28

+75

CHANGE

2,142

2,128

1,888

1,775

1,640

1,764

1,714

1,825

1,711

1,832

1,870

1,852

1,858

2,131

1,826

2,313

2,623

2,600

2,669

2,502

2,489

2,551

2,413

2,656

2,644

2,529

2,547

2,552

2,510

2,531

INFLOW

 2,068

 2,076

 1,759

 1,701

 1,700

 1,681

 1,663

 1,702

 1,589

 1,655

 1,692

 1,713

 1,721

 1,934

 1,951

 2,169

 2,409

 2,454

 2,520

 2,473

 2,459

 2,451

 2,497

 2,486

 2,526

 2,472

 2,477

 2,442

 2,457

 2,432

POWER

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 2

SPILL

 60

 60

 60

 60

 60

 60

 60

 60

 60

 60

 60

 60

 60

 60

 60

 60

 60

 60

 60

 60

 60

 60

 60

 60

 60

 60

 60

 60

 60

 59

HATCHERY

 0

 1

 0

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

C.F.S.

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

NOVEMBER 2000 LAKE NATOMA DAILY OPERATIONS RUN DATE: December 14, 2000

IN LAKE

EVAP

C.F.S.

COMPUTED*

ACRE-FEET

RELEASE - C.F.S.

TOTALS -165 66,085 63,329 2 1,799 21

ACRE-FEET -165 131,080 125,613 4 3,568 42

COMMENTS:

* COMPUTED INFLOW IS THE SUM OF CHANGE IN STORAGE, RELEASES AND EVAPORATION.

SUMMARY

RELEASES (ACRE-FEET)

POWER 125,613

SPILL 4

FOLSOM SOUTH CANAL

HATCHERY

 2,015

 3,568

 8,346

FOLSOM

SOUTH 

CANAL

 47

 18

 35

 40

 45

 50

 53

 53

 36

 35

 36

 40

 40

 40

 40

 40

 40

 40

 40

 54

 40

 34

 25

 20

 20

 18

 15

 15

 7

 0

 1,016

 2,015

(1)

(1) INCHES OF EVAPORATION TAKEN FROM FOLSOM PAN.

RELEASES (ACRE-FEET)

TOTAL 131,200

Table 12
r )L ' (~ r:- ( -. ;_'J, 

BOBBY JINDAL 

GOVERNOR 1( OCT 22 Pr1 6: 03 

~tate of JLoutstana 

Mr. Mark Hansen 

DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL QUALI1Y 

ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICFS 

October 15, 2014 

Acting Associate Director, Air Programs 

U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Region 6 

1445 Ross Avenue, Suite 1200 

Dallas, TX 75202-2733 

Re: Louisiana State Implementation Plan (SIP) Update 

Nonattainment New Source Review (NNSR) 

Dear Mr. Hansen: 

PEGGY M. HATCH 

SECRETARY 

By letter dated November 9, 2007, the Louisiana Department of Environmental Quality (LDEQ) 

transmitted its "2006 General Revisions to the State Implementation Plan (SIP)" to the U.S. 

Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), Region 6. 1 

This submission requested that EPA approve amendments to LAC 33:111.504 (Nonattainment New 

Source Review Procedures) promulgated by LDEQ in September 2006 (AQ253). These 

amendments included provisions under LAC 33:lll.504.M which established offset requirements for 

sources located in the parishes of Ascension, East Baton Rouge, Iberville, Livingston, and West 

Baton Rouge that are more stringent than required by the Clean Air Act. 

By way of this correspondence, LDEQ requests that EPA take no action on LAC 33:III.504.M. It is 

LDEQ's desire that this subsection remain "state-only" and not be included in Louisiana's SIP. 

Should you have any questions concerning this matter, please contact Bryan D. Johnston of the 

Air Permits Division at (225) 219-3450. 

Sincerely, 

Tegan 

~~ B. Treadaway 

Assistant Secretary 

TBT:BDJ 

1 EDMS Doc 1D 3447500 

Post Office Box 4313 o Baton Rouge, Louisiana 70821-4313 o Phone 225-219-3181 o Fax 225-219-3309 

www.dea.louisiana.aov
# Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

December 11, 2019

No. 04

- 19

- 00812

- CV

Ken KINSEY,

Appellant

v.

AL GLOBAL SERVICES, LLC,

Appellee

From the 57th Judicial District Court, Bexar Count y, Texas

Trial Court No. 2018CI22581

Honorable Antonia Arteaga, Judge Presiding



### O R D E R

The Appellant’s Motion to Extend Time to File Appellant’s Brief is hereby GRANTED.

Time is extended to January 22, 2020

.

I t is so ORDERED on this 11th day of December, 2019

.

PER CURIAM

ATTESTED TO:

__________________________

MICHAEL A. CRUZ

, Clerk of Court
Document Summary:

     Document:     EX-23-95            
     Author:       
     Addressee:    
     Operator:     

     Creation Date:      03/28/1996
     Modification Date:  03/28/1996

     Identification key words: 
          
          
          
     Comments: 
          
          
          
          














































     
                     Exhibit 23

       Consent of Independent Certified Public Accountants






The Board of Directors
IWC Resources Corporation:

           We consent to incorporation by reference in the 
Registration Statement No. 33-30221 on Form S-8 and Registration 
Statement No. 33-6406 on Form S-3 (originally on Form S-16) of 
IWC Resources Corporation of our reports dated January 25, 1996, 
relating to the consolidated balance sheets of IWC Resources 
Corporation and subsidiaries as of December 31, 1995 and 1994, 
and the related consolidated statements of shareholders' equity 
earnings and cash flows for each of the years in the three-year 
period ended December 31, 1995, which report appears in the 1995 
Annual Report to Shareholders and has been incorporated by 
reference in the December 31, 1995 annual report on Form 10-K of 
IWC Resources Corporation.



                                        

KPMG PEAT MARWICK LLP
Indianapolis, Indiana 

March 22, 1996