alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM
FIRECOM, INC.'S CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET, STATEMENT OF INCOME AND
STATEMENT OF CASH FLOW FOR THE PERIOD ENDED JANUARY 31, 1996, AND IS
QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER>  1,000
       
<S>                     <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>          9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                      APR-30-1996
<PERIOD-END>                           JAN-31-1996
<CASH>                                 1,955
<SECURITIES>                             0
<RECEIVABLES>                          4,073
<ALLOWANCES>                             326
<INVENTORY>                            1,034
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                       7,252
<PP&E>                                 1,156
<DEPRECIATION>                           683
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                         7,898
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                  1,730
<BONDS>                                  0
<COMMON>                                  52
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                    0
<PREFERRED>                            1,437
<OTHER-SE>                             3,011
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>           7,898
<SALES>                               11,010
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                      11,010
<CGS>                                  5,879
<TOTAL-COSTS>                          5,879
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                       2,870
<LOSS-PROVISION>                         199
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                        72
<INCOME-PRETAX>                        1,990
<INCOME-TAX>                             948
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                    1,042
<DISCONTINUED>                           0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                          0
<CHANGES>                                0
<NET-INCOME>                           1,042
<EPS-PRIMARY>                           .17
<EPS-DILUTED>                           .17
        


</TABLE>
Editorial Note on Part 4
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 4 appear by T.D. ATF-425, 65 FR 11890, Mar. 7, 2000.

§ 4.23 Varietal (grape type) labeling. ( a ) *General.* The names of one or more grape varieties may be used as the type designation of a grape wine only if the wine is also labeled with an appellation of origin as defined in § 4.25.
( b ) *One variety.* Except as provided in paragraph (c) of this section, the name of a single grape variety may be used as the type designation if not less than 75 percent of the wine is derived from grapes of that variety, the entire 75 percent of which was grown in the labeled appellation of origin area.
( c ) *Exceptions.* ( 1 ) Wine made from any *Vitis labrusca* variety (exclusive of hybrids with *Vitis labrusca* parentage) may be labeled with the variety name if: ( i ) Not less than 51 percent of the wine is derived from grapes of the named variety;
( ii ) The statement “contains not less than 51 percent (name of variety)” is shown on the brand label, back label, or a separate strip label, (except that this statement need not appear if 75 percent or more of the wine is derived from grapes of the named variety); and
( iii ) The entire qualifying percentage of the named variety was grown in the labeled appellation of origin area.
( 2 ) Wine made from any variety of any species found by the appropriate TTB officer upon appropriate application to be too strongly flavored at 75 percent minimum varietal content may be labeled with the varietal name if: ( i ) Not less than 51 percent of the wine is derived from grapes of that variety;
( ii ) The statement “contains not less than 51 percent (name of variety)” is shown on the brand label, back label, or a separate strip label (except that this statement need not appear if 75 percent or more of the wine is derived from grapes of the named variety); and
( iii ) The entire qualifying percentage of the named variety was grown in the labeled appellation of origin area.
( d ) *Two or more varieties.* The names of two or more grape varieties may be used as the type designation if: ( 1 ) All of the grapes used to make the wine are of the labeled varieties;
( 2 ) The percentage of the wine derived from each variety is shown on the label (with a tolerance of plus or minus 2 percent); and
( 3 ) ( i ) If labeled with a multicounty appellation of origin, the percentage of the wine derived from each variety from each county is shown on the label; or
( ii ) If labeled with a multistate appellation of origin, the percentage of the wine derived from each variety from each state is shown on the label.
( e ) *List of approved variety names.* Effective February 7, 1996, the name of a grape variety may be used as a type designation for an American wine only if that name has been approved by the Administrator. A list of approved grape variety names appears in subpart J of this part.
[T.D. ATF-370, 61 FR 538, Jan. 8, 1996, as amended by T.D. TTB-91, 76 FR 5476, Feb. 1, 2011]
[if !vml]>[endif]>

[if !vml]>[endif]>

You have reached the FederalDepository Library Program Electronic Collection (FDLP/EC) Archive. Thisarchive assures ongoing access to publications in the FDLP/EC. Access topublications in the archive is available through GPO's suite of cataloging andlocator services, including the Catalog of U.S. Government Publications(CGP).  Archived copies of publications are retrieved in the event thatpublications are no longer available from the original publishing agency site. 
**Title:****Catalog of FEMA flood and windpublications, and training courses**
 
Editions: 2nd | 3rd | 5th
 
SuDoc Number:HS 5.102:C 28/5
Item Number:0520-E-01 (online)
CGP systemNumber:000637056
 
August 6, 2019
News Release
    
    TRW Automotive
12001 Tech Center Drive
Livonia, MI 48150
    

(TRW LOGO)Investor Relations Contact:Mark Oswald1.734.855.3140Media Contact:Lynette Jackson44.776.964.3152
 TRW Provides Update on Antitrust Inquiries
 LIVONIA, MICHIGAN, July 11, 2011
   1




---



##### 



About TRW
  Forward-Looking Statements
   2
Exhibit
10.19
 CARDIAC SCIENCE CORPORATION
2002 STOCK INCENTIVE PLAN
 FORM
OF RESTRICTED STOCK UNIT AWARD AGREEMENT
 Award Notice Agreement Company Award 2002 Plan
  1. Vesting and Settlement
 Vesting Schedule Vested Units Unvested Units Units
 2. Termination of Award upon Termination of Service
  3. Securities Law Compliance
 3.1




---



##### 



3.2 Shares
 3.3 Acts
 3.4
 4. Transfer Restrictions
  5. Book Entry Registration of the Shares
  6. No Rights as Stockholder
  7. Independent Tax Advice




---



##### 



9. Withholding
  9. General Provisions
 9.1 Assignment
 9.2 No Waiver
 9.3 Undertaking
 9.4 Agreement Is Entire Contract
 9.5 Successors and Assigns




---



##### 



9.6 No Employment or Service Contract
 9.7 Shareholder of Record
 9.8 Counterparts
 9.9 Governing Law
 9.10 Limitation on Rights; No Right to Future Grants; Extraordinary Item of Compensation
 9.11 Employee Data Privacy




---



#####
§ 10.113 What should the employer do when an employee dies from a work-related injury or disease? ( a ) The employer shall immediately report a death due to a work-related traumatic injury or occupational disease to OWCP by telephone, telegram, or facsimile (fax). No more than 10 working days after notification of the death, the employer shall complete and send Form CA-6 to OWCP.
( b ) When possible, the employer shall furnish a Form CA-5 or CA-5b to all persons likely to be entitled to compensation for death of an employee. The employer should also supply information about completing and filing the form.
( c ) The employer shall promptly transmit Form CA-5 or CA-5b to OWCP. The employer shall also promptly transmit to OWCP any other claim or paper submitted which appears to claim compensation on account of death.
A-AA+Skip to content

                  - Home
                  - Compendium Statistics
                  - Event
                  - Archives
                  - Glossary
                  - Help
                  - Contact
                  - Research on Disability

Annual Disability Statistics Compendium

              - Home /
              - Archives /
              - 2012 Compendium Statistics /
              - 2012 Health Insurance Coverage /
              - 2012 7.2 Health Insurance Coverage - Civilians with Disabilities AGes 18-64 Years Living in the Community for the U.S. by Type of Coverage

## Table 7.2 Health Insurance Coverage—Percent (%) Covered Among Civilians with Disabilities Ages 18 to 64 Years Living in the Community for the United States and States, by Type of Coverage: 2011

----

----

 

----

#### 2012 Disability Compendium

                        - Home
                        - Compendium Statistics                           - Population and Prevelance
                          - Employment
                          - Time Trend Population Statistics
                          - Poverty
                          - Earnings
                          - Veterans
                          - Health Insurance Coverage
                          - Health
                          - Social Security Administration Programs
                          - Medicaid and Medicare
                          - Special Education
                          - Vocational Rehabilitation
                          - Federal Government Spending and Employment
                          - International Disability Statistics
                          - Population Statistics: Disability Type
                        - Event
                        - Archives                           - 2012 Compendium Statistics
                        - Glossary
                        - Help
                        - Contact
                        - Research on Disability

#### Funding for this project is made possible by:

 The Research and Training Center on Disability Statistics and Demographics (StatsRRTC), which is funded by the U.S. Department of Education, National Institute for Disability and Rehabilitation Research, under cooperative agreements H133B080012.

#### Stay Connected

**Institute on Disability**10 West Edge Drive, Suite 101Durham, NH 03824603.862.4320 | relay: 711 | [email protected]www.iod.unh.edu

© 2013. Institute on Disability.University of New Hampshire.
EXHIBIT 12.3

**Form 10-QPACCAR And Subsidiaries**

**COMPUTATION OF RATIO OF EARNINGS TO FIXED CHARGES**

**PURSUANT TO SEC REPORTING REQUIREMENTS****(Millions of Dollars)**

|                                                                                 | Three Months Ended  March 31, |
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-------------------------------|
|                                                                                 | **2001******                  | 2000 |
|                                                                                 |   (Unaudited)       |
|    FIXED CHARGES                                                           |                          |   |
|        Interest expense - PACCAR and  subsidiaries (1) | **$60.2**                     | $55.4 |
|        Portion of rentals deemed interest              | **3.3******                   | 5.0 |
|                                                                                 |                          |   |
|    TOTAL FIXED CHARGES                                                     | **$63.5******                 | $60.4 |
|    EARNINGS                                                                |                          |   |
|        Income before taxes - PACCAR and  subsidiaries  | **$65.6**                     | $242.8 |
|        Fixed charges                                   | **63.5******                  | 60.4 |
|    EARNINGS AS DEFINED                                                     | **$129.1******                | $303.2 |
|                                                                                 |                          |   |
|    RATIO OF EARNINGS TO FIXED CHARGES                                      | **2.03x**                     | 5.02x |
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Edgar Alejandro VENEGAS-CASTILLO, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 05-41157

Conference Calendar.

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.

June 21, 2006.

James Lee Turner, Assistant U.S. Attorney, U.S. Attorney’s Office Southern District of Texas, Houston, TX, for PlaintiffAppellee.

Marjorie A. Meyers, Federal Public Defender, Michael L. Herman, Federal Public Defender’s Office Southern District of Texas, Houston, TX, for Defendant-Appellant.

Before STEWART, DENNIS, and OWEN, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: *

Edgar Alejandro Venegas-Castillo (Venegas) appeals the conviction and sentence resulting from his plea of guilty to illegally reentering the United States following deportation. *See*8 U.S.C. § 1326.

Venegas originally contended that the district court erred by refusing to count three prior convictions as related convictions for purposes of calculating his criminal history. However, Venegas now concedes that at least two of the convictions were not related under the Sentencing Guidelines because they were separated by an intervening arrest. *See*U.S.S.G. § 4A1.2(a)(2) & comment, (n.3) (Nov.2004). He also concedes that any remaining error in his criminal history score would be harmless. No relief is warranted regarding Venegas’s criminal history.

Venegas also contends that the “felony” and “aggravated felony” provisions of 8 U.S.C. § 1326(b)(1) and (b)(2) are unconstitutional in light of *Apprendi v. New Jersey,*530 U.S. 466, 120 S.Ct. 2348, 147 *347L.Ed.2d 435 (2000). Venegas’s constitutional challenge is foreclosed by *Almendarez-Torres v. United States,*523 U.S. 224, 235, 118 S.Ct. 1219, 140 L.Ed.2d 350 (1998). Although Venegas contends that *Almendarez-Torres*was incorrectly decided and that a majority of the Supreme Court would overrule *Almendarez-Torres*in hght of *Apprendi,*we have repeatedly rejected such arguments on the basis that *Almendarez-Torres*remains binding. *See United States v. Garza-Lopez,*410 F.3d 268, 276 (5th Cir.), *cert. denied,*— U.S. -, 126 S.Ct. 298, 163 L.Ed.2d 260 (2005). Venegas properly concedes that his argument is foreclosed in light of *Almendarez-Torres*and circuit precedent, but he raises it here to preserve it for further review.

The judgment of the district court is

AFFIRMED.

*

 Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.
**AD Economic Evaluation**

Docket No. FAA - 20 09 - 0951 Directorate ID: 20 07 - SW - 052 - AD Helicopter Model: Eurocopter France Model AS350B, AS350BA, AS350B1, AS350B2, AS350B3, AS350C, AS350D, AS350D1, AS355E, AS355F, AS355F1 , AS355F2, and AS355N Helicopters Number of Helicopters (U.S. Operators): 725 Helicopters in the US Registry . Reason : The actions of this AD are intended to are intended to prevent the loss of the sliding door, which could come into contact with the rotor system, leading to damage to the helicopter and loss of helicopter control. Costs : Parts per Helicopter $ 7,000 Labor per Helicopter (4 work- hour x $85/work hour for the inspection and modification) $ 340 Other (Explain) Total Cost per Helicopter $ 7,340 Total US Fleet Cost $ 5,321,500 Executive Order 12866 : Could the AD be considered a “significant regulatory action?” Yes ( ) No (  ) DOT Regulatory

Policies and Procedures : Is the AD significant? Yes ( ) Explain Below No (  ) Regulatory

Fl exibility

Act : Will the AD have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities? Yes ( ) No (  ) Project Engineer: Gary

Roach
Editorial Note on Part 70
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 70 appear by T.D. ATF-450, 66 FR 29022-29030, May 29, 2001.

§ 70.121 Amounts treated as overpayments. ( a ) The term *overpayment* includes any payment of any internal revenue tax which is assessed or collected after the expiration of the period of limitation applicable thereto.
( b ) An amount paid as tax shall not be considered not to constitute an overpayment solely by reason of the fact that there was no tax liability in respect of which such amount was paid.
(26 U.S.C. 6401)
[T.D. ATF-251, 52 FR 19314, May 22, 1987. Redesignated by T.D. ATF-301, 55 FR 47606, Nov. 14, 1990]
Exhibit 99.1




                       GE CAPITAL MORTGAGE SERVICES, INC.
             OFFICERS' ANNUAL COMPLIANCE CERTIFICATE - SERIES 1997-1


         The undersigned,  Vice Presidents of GE Capital Mortgage Services, Inc.
(the "Servicer"), pursuant to the Pooling and Servicing Agreement for the Series
1997-1 REMIC Multi-Class  Mortgage  Pass-Through  Certificates (the "Agreement")
entered into by GE Capital Mortgage Services,  Inc., as Seller and Servicer, and
State Street Bank and Trust Company,  as Trustee,  which  Agreement  requires an
annual  statement of  compliance  to be made to the Trustee by an officer of the
Servicer, hereby state that:

     (i)  a review  of the  activities  of the  Servicer  during  the  preceding
          calendar year and of its performance under the Agreement has been made
          under the undersigned officers' supervision; and

     (ii) to the  best of the  undersigned  officers'  knowledge,  based on such
          review,  the Servicer has  fulfilled  all of its material  obligations
          under  the  Agreement  throughout  such  year,  except as set forth on
          Exhibit A hereto.

Capitalized  terms used  herein but not  defined  herein  shall have the meaning
given to them in the Agreement.


Dated:            March 25, 1998




By:      /s/ Gregory A. Gibson
------------------------------
         Gregory A. Gibson
         Vice President


By:      /s/ Karen Pickett
--------------------------
         Karen Pickett
         Vice President


<PAGE>



                                    EXHIBIT A


         Flood Insurance.  There may be instances in which mortgage loans in the
CompanyOs   servicing  portfolio  which  did  not  require  flood  insurance  at
origination  were  subsequently  included  within  special flood hazard areas as
designated by the Federal  Emergency  Management  Agency and flood  insurance on
such mortgage loans may not yet be in place. The Company,  however, has arranged
for back-up flood insurance  coverage in the event of a flood loss relating to a
mortgaged  property  located in a special  flood  hazard  area.  The  Company is
continuing  a  remapping  effort  which  will  identify  mortgage  loans  in its
servicing  portfolio  which  may  now be (but  which  were  not at  origination)
included in special flood hazard  areas.  The Company is not aware of any losses
associated with the lack of flood insurance coverage on such mortgage loans.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY ELEV

 881.92

 881.47

 880.82

 880.59

 879.94

 879.48

 879.54

 879.47

 878.94

 878.39

 878.40

 878.28

 878.29

 878.93

 879.91

 880.69

 881.24

 881.50

 881.98

 882.23

 882.64

 882.93

 882.77

 882.42

 882.21

 881.95

 881.83

 881.75

 881.94

 882.26

 882.40

 621.7

 619.3

 615.8

 614.6

 611.1

 608.7

 609.0

 608.7

 605.9

 603.0

 603.0

 602.4

 602.5

 605.8

 611.0

 615.1

 618.0

 619.4

 622.0

 623.3

 625.5

 627.1

 626.2

 624.3

 623.2

 621.8

 621.2

 620.8

 621.8

 623.5

 624.2

STORAGE

-0.5

-2.4

-3.5

-1.2

-3.4

-2.4

+0.3

-0.4

-2.8

-2.9

+0.1

-0.6

+0.1

+3.4

+5.2

+4.1

+2.9

+1.4

+2.6

+1.3

+2.2

+1.6

-0.9

-1.9

-1.1

-1.4

-0.6

-0.4

+1.0

+1.7

+0.8

CHANGE

1,737

1,928

2,057

1,833

2,000

2,064

2,275

2,015

2,109

1,953

2,225

2,237

2,610

3,966

4,188

4,069

3,402

3,059

2,779

2,865

2,984

2,501

1,815

1,413

1,315

1,358

1,414

1,669

1,817

2,102

2,297

INFLOW

 1,925

 3,092

 3,750

 2,412

 3,701

 3,261

 2,111

 2,192

 3,491

 3,364

 2,159

 2,491

 2,532

 2,207

 1,522

 1,933

 1,864

 2,296

 1,439

 2,099

 1,831

 1,668

 2,208

 2,326

 1,844

 2,013

 1,672

 1,820

 1,245

 1,174

 1,846

POWER

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

SPILL

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

OUTLET

 55

 45

 52

 36

 36

 26

 5

 9

 27

 44

 39

 64

 51

 66

 62

 52

 64

 64

 50

 90

 45

 49

 40

 33

 38

 47

 64

 64

 61

 64

 73

C.F.S.

 .32

 .26

 .30

 .21

 .21

 .15

 .03

 .05

 .16

 .26

 .23

 .38

 .30

 .39

 .36

 .30

 .37

 .37

 .29

 .52

 .26

 .28

 .23

 .19

 .22

 .27

 .37

 .37

 .35

 .37

 .42

INCHES

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .08

 .06

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

PRECIP

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

MAY 2016 NEW MELONES LAKE DAILY OPERATIONS RUN DATE: June 3, 2016

IN LAKE

EVAPORATION

INCHES

C.F.S.

COMPUTED*

1000 ACRE-FEET

RELEASE - C.F.S.

TOTALS +2.3 72,056 69,488 0 0 1,515 8.79 .14

ACRE-FEET +2,300 142,923 137,829 0 0 3,005

COMMENTS:

* COMPUTED INFLOW IS THE SUM OF CHANGE IN STORAGE, RELEASES AND EVAPORATION.

SUMMARY

RELEASE (ACRE-FEET)

POWER 137,829

SPILL 0

OUTLET

TOTAL

 0

 137,829

PRECIPITATION

THIS MONTH =

TO DATE =

 .14

JULY 1, 2015 30.90

 622.1

Table 13