alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
### §3462. Experts and consultants

#### (a) In general

The Secretary may as provided in appropriation Acts obtain the services of experts and consultants in accordance with the provisions of section 3109 of title 5 and may compensate such experts and consultants at rates not to exceed the daily rate prescribed for GS–18 of the General Schedule under section 5332 of such title.

#### (b) Special rule

#### (1) In general

Notwithstanding any other provision of law, the Secretary may use not more than 1 percent of the funds appropriated for any education program that awards such funds on a competitive basis to pay the expenses and fees of non-Federal experts necessary to review applications and proposals for such funds.

#### (2) Applicability

The provisions of paragraph (1) shall not apply to any education program under which funds are authorized to be appropriated to pay the fees and expenses of non-Federal experts to review applications and proposals for such funds.

(Pub. L. 96–88, title IV, §402, Oct. 17, 1979, 93 Stat. 682; Pub. L. 103–227, title IX, §981, Mar. 31, 1994, 108 Stat. 263.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

1994—Pub. L. 103–227 designated existing provisions as subsec. (a), inserted heading, and added subsec. (b).

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### References in Other Laws to GS–16, 17, or 18 Pay Rates

References in laws to the rates of pay for GS–16, 17, or 18, or to maximum rates of pay under the General Schedule, to be considered references to rates payable under specified sections of Title 5, Government Organization and Employees, see section 529 [title I, §101(c)(1)] of Pub. L. 101–509, set out in a note under section 5376 of Title 5.
A-AA+Skip to content

                  - Home
                  - Compendium Statistics
                  - Event
                  - Archives
                  - Glossary
                  - Help
                  - Contact
                  - Research on Disability

Annual Disability Statistics Compendium

              - Home /
              - Archives /
              - 2012 Compendium Statistics /
              - 2012 Social Security Administration Programs /
              - 2012 9.8b Supplemental Security Income—Change in the Number of Recipients of Federally Administered Payments, Blind and Disabled Eligible

## Table 9.8b: Supplemental Security Income—Change in the Number of Recipients of Federally Administered Payments, Blind and Disabled Eligible: 2009 to 2010

----

----

 

----

#### 2012 Disability Compendium

                        - Home
                        - Compendium Statistics                           - Population and Prevelance
                          - Employment
                          - Time Trend Population Statistics
                          - Poverty
                          - Earnings
                          - Veterans
                          - Health Insurance Coverage
                          - Health
                          - Social Security Administration Programs
                          - Medicaid and Medicare
                          - Special Education
                          - Vocational Rehabilitation
                          - Federal Government Spending and Employment
                          - International Disability Statistics
                          - Population Statistics: Disability Type
                        - Event
                        - Archives                           - 2012 Compendium Statistics
                        - Glossary
                        - Help
                        - Contact
                        - Research on Disability

#### Funding for this project is made possible by:

 The Research and Training Center on Disability Statistics and Demographics (StatsRRTC), which is funded by the U.S. Department of Education, National Institute for Disability and Rehabilitation Research, under cooperative agreements H133B080012.

#### Stay Connected

**Institute on Disability**10 West Edge Drive, Suite 101Durham, NH 03824603.862.4320 | relay: 711 | [email protected]www.iod.unh.edu

© 2013. Institute on Disability.University of New Hampshire.
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Saul DE PAZ-SAUCEDO, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 05-40048.

Conference Calendar.

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.

Decided Feb. 23, 2006.

James Lee Turner, Assistant U.S. Attorney, U.S. Attorney’s Office Southern District of Texas, Houston, TX, for PlaintiffAppellee.

Marjorie A. Meyers, Federal Public Defender, H. Michael Sokolow, Federal Public Defender’s Office Southern District of Texas, Houston, TX, for Defendant-Appellant.

Before GARZA, DENNIS, and PRADO, Circuit Judges.

*619PER CURIAM: *

Saul De Paz-Saucedo (De Paz) appeals from his guilty-plea conviction for being unlawfully present in the United States subsequent to deportation following an aggravated felony conviction. De Paz’s constitutional challenge to 8 U.S.C. § 1326(b) is foreclosed by *Almendarez-Torres v. United States,*523 U.S. 224, 235, 118 S.Ct. 1219, 140 L.Ed.2d 350 (1998). Although De Paz contends that *Almendarez-Torres*was incorrectly decided and that a majority of the Supreme Court would overrule *Almendarez-Torres*in light of *Apprendi v. New Jersey,*530 U.S. 466, 120 S.Ct. 2348, 147 L.Ed.2d 435 (2000), we have repeatedly rejected such arguments on the basis that *Almendarez-Torres*remains binding. *See United States v. Garza-Lopez,*410 F.3d 268, 276 (5th Cir.), *cert. denied,*— U.S.-, 126 S.Ct. 298, 163 L.Ed.2d 260 (2005). De Paz properly concedes that his argument is foreclosed in light of *Almendarez-Torres*and circuit precedent, but he raises it here to preserve it for further review.

AFFIRMED.

*

 Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.
<PAGE>   1
                                                                 EXHIBIT 16.1


                         [TERRENCE J. DUNNE LETTERHEAD]




January 21, 1998




Securities and Exchange Commission
450 Fifth Street N.W.
Washington, D.C.  20549

Gentlemen:

I have read the statements made by PAN Environmental Corporation, which I
understand will be filed with the Commission pursuant to Part II, Item 8 of
Form 10-KSB as part of the company's Form 10-KSB for the fiscal years ended
December 31, 1994, 1995, 1996 and 1997, and in the subsequent reports under
the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.  I agree with the
statement concerning my firm in the Form 10-KSB.

Sincerely,

/s/  TERRENCE J. DUNNE
---------------------------
Terrence J. Dunne
Certified Public Accountant
(No. 7013

#### Mobile Drilling Company, Inc., Claimant, *vs.*State of Illinois, Department of Transportation, Respondent.

*Opinion filed February 1, 1973.*

*190Mobile Drilling Company, Inc., Claimant, pro se.

William J. Scott, Attorney General; William E. Webber, Assistant Attorney General, for Respondent.

Per Curiam.
### §1140o. Authorization of appropriations

#### (a) In general

There are authorized to be appropriated to carry out this subpart such sums as may be necessary for fiscal year 2009 and each of the five succeeding fiscal years.

#### (b) Priority

For the first fiscal year for which funds are made available under this section, the Secretary shall give priority to allocating funding for the purposes of section 1140l of this title.

(Pub. L. 89–329, title VII, §775, as added Pub. L. 110–315, title VII, §709(2), Aug. 14, 2008, 122 Stat. 3373.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Prior Provisions

A prior section 775 of Pub. L. 89–329 was classified to section 1132h–4 of this title, prior to repeal by Pub. L. 102–325.
### §6339. Carryover and waiver

#### (a) Limitation on carryover

Notwithstanding section 1225(b) of this title or any other provision of law, not more than 15 percent of the funds allocated to a local educational agency for any fiscal year under this subpart (but not including funds received through any reallocation under this subpart) may remain available for obligation by such agency for one additional fiscal year.

#### (b) Waiver

A State educational agency may, once every 3 years, waive the percentage limitation in subsection (a) if—

(1) the agency determines that the request of a local educational agency is reasonable and necessary; or

(2) supplemental appropriations for this subpart become available.

#### (c) Exclusion

The percentage limitation under subsection (a) shall not apply to any local educational agency that receives less than $50,000 under this subpart for any fiscal year.

(Pub. L. 89–10, title I, §1127, as added Pub. L. 107–110, title I, §101, Jan. 8, 2002, 115 Stat. 1534.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Prior Provisions

A prior section 1127 of Pub. L. 89–10 was classified to section 6338 of this title, prior to the general amendment of this subchapter by Pub. L. 107–110.
###### Editorial Note on Part 478

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 478 appear by T.D. ATF-411, 64 FR 17291, Apr. 9, 1999, T.D. ATF-487, 68 FR 3750, Jan. 24, 2003, and ATF-11F, 73 FR 57240, Oct. 2, 2008.

#### § 478.77 Designated place of hearing.

The designated place of the hearing shall be a location convenient to the aggrieved party.

[T.D. ATF-270, 53 FR 10496, Mar. 31, 1988]
#### § 7.84 Use of the term “organic.”

Use of the term “organic” is permitted if any such use complies with the United States Department of Agriculture (USDA) National Organic Program rules (7 CFR part 205), as interpreted by the USDA.
### §2004. Harry S Truman Scholarship Foundation

#### (a) Establishment

There is established, as an independent establishment of the executive branch of the United States Government, the Harry S Truman Scholarship Foundation.

#### (b) Board of Trustees; membership

(1) 1 The Foundation shall be subject to the supervision and direction of a Board of Trustees. The Board shall be composed of thirteen members, as follows:

(A) two Members of the Senate, one from each political party, to be appointed by the President of the Senate;

(B) two Members of the House of Representatives, one from each political party, to be appointed by the Speaker;

(C) eight members, not more than four of whom shall be of the same political party, to be appointed by the President with the advice and consent of the Senate, of whom one shall be a chief executive officer of a State, one a chief executive officer of a city or county, one a member of a Federal court, one a member of a State court, one a person active in postsecondary education, and three representatives of the general public; and

(D) the Secretary of Education or his designate, who shall serve ex officio as a member of the Board, but shall not be eligible to serve as Chairman.

#### (c) Term of office

The term of office of each member of the Board shall be six years; except that (1) the members first taking office shall serve as designated by the President, four for terms of two years, five for terms of four years, and four for terms of six years, and (2) any member appointed to fill a vacancy shall serve for the remainder of the term for which his predecessor was appointed, and shall be appointed in the same manner as the original appointment for that vacancy was made.

#### (d) Compensation

Members of the Board shall serve without pay, but shall be entitled to reimbursement for travel, subsistence, and other necessary expenses incurred in the performance of their duties.

(Pub. L. 93–642, §5, Jan. 4, 1975, 88 Stat. 2277; Pub. L. 96–88, title III, §301(a)(1), title V, §507, Oct. 17, 1979, 93 Stat. 677, 692.)

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Transfer of Functions

"Secretary of Education" substituted for "Commissioner of Education" in subsec. (b)(1)(D) pursuant to sections 301(a)(1) and 507 of Pub. L. 96–88, which are classified to sections 3441(a)(1) and 3507 of this title and which transferred functions of Commissioner of Education to Secretary of Education.

1 So in original. No par. (2) has been enacted.
### §1651. Prohibition against assignment or transportation of students to overcome racial imbalance

No provision of this Act shall be construed to require the assignment or transportation of students or teachers in order to overcome racial imbalance.

(Pub. L. 92–318, title VIII, §801, June 23, 1972, 86 Stat. 371.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

This Act, referred to in text, is Pub. L. 92–318, June 23, 1972, 86 Stat. 235, known as the Education Amendments of 1972. For complete classification of this Act to the Code, see Short Title note set out under section 1001 of this title and Tables.
### subpart 1—teacher and school leader incentive program
A-AA+Skip to content

                  - Home
                  - Compendium Statistics
                  - Event
                  - Archives
                  - Glossary
                  - Help
                  - Contact
                  - Research on Disability

Annual Disability Statistics Compendium

              - Home /
              - Archives /
              - 2012 Compendium Statistics /
              - 2012 Population and Prevalence /
              - 2012 1.8 Civilians Ages 18-64 Living in the Community for the U.S.-Hearing Disability

## Table 1.8: Civilians Ages 18 to 64 Years Living in the Community for the United States and States—Hearing Disability: 2011

----

----

 

----

#### 2012 Disability Compendium

                        - Home
                        - Compendium Statistics                           - Population and Prevelance
                          - Employment
                          - Time Trend Population Statistics
                          - Poverty
                          - Earnings
                          - Veterans
                          - Health Insurance Coverage
                          - Health
                          - Social Security Administration Programs
                          - Medicaid and Medicare
                          - Special Education
                          - Vocational Rehabilitation
                          - Federal Government Spending and Employment
                          - International Disability Statistics
                          - Population Statistics: Disability Type
                        - Event
                        - Archives                           - 2012 Compendium Statistics
                        - Glossary
                        - Help
                        - Contact
                        - Research on Disability

#### Funding for this project is made possible by:

 The Research and Training Center on Disability Statistics and Demographics (StatsRRTC), which is funded by the U.S. Department of Education, National Institute for Disability and Rehabilitation Research, under cooperative agreements H133B080012.

#### Stay Connected

**Institute on Disability**10 West Edge Drive, Suite 101Durham, NH 03824603.862.4320 | relay: 711 | [email protected]www.iod.unh.edu

© 2013. Institute on Disability.University of New Hampshire.
**EXHIBIT 12.1**

 

**FORM 10-Q**

**PACCAR FINANCIAL CORP.**

 

**COMPUTATION OF RATIO OF EARNINGS TO FIXEDCHARGES**

 

**PURSUANT TO SEC REPORTING REQUIREMENTS**(1)

(Millions of Dollars)

 
|                                |   | **Three Months Ended  March 31** |        |
|-------------------------------------|--------|----------------------------------|-------------|
|                                |   | **2003**                         |        | **2002** |   |
|                                |   |                             |        |   |   |
| FIXED CHARGES                       |   |                             |        |   |   |
| Interest expense                    |   | **$**                            | **22.8**    |   | $ | 31.8 |   |
| Portion of  rentals deemed interest |   | **.3**                           |        | .3 |   |
|                                |   |                             |        |   |   |
| TOTAL FIXED  CHARGES                |   | **$**                            | **23.1**    |   | $ | 32.1 |   |
|                                |   |                             |        |   |   |
| EARNINGS                            |   |                             |        |   |   |
| Income before  income taxes         |   | **$**                            | **17.0**    |   | $ | 3.6 |   |
| Fixed charges                       |   | **23.1**                         |        | 32.1 |   |
|                                |   |                             |        |   |   |
| EARNINGS AS  DEFINED                |   | **$**                            | **40.1**    |   | $ | 35.7 |   |
|                                |   |                             |        |   |   |
| RATIO OF  EARNINGS TO FIXED CHARGES |   | **1.74**                         | **x**  | 1.11 | x |

 

----

(1) The method of computing theratio of earnings to fixed charges shown above complies with SEC reportingrequirements but differs from the method called for in the Support Agreementbetween the Company and PACCAR as shown in Exhibit 12.2.

 

----
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

DAY ELEV

 1,053.21

 1,053.16

 1,053.22

 1,053.14

 1,053.19

 1,053.22

 1,053.08

 1,053.05

 1,052.98

 1,052.89

 1,052.81

 1,052.68

 1,052.75

 1,052.79

 1,052.42

 1,052.46

 1,052.59

 1,052.62

 1,052.83

 1,052.99

 1,052.87

 1,052.81

 1,052.73

 1,052.74

 1,052.62

 1,052.46

 1,052.35

 1,052.21

 1,052.05

 1,051.91

 2,010.4

 2,009.9

 2,010.5

 2,009.7

 2,010.2

 2,010.5

 2,009.0

 2,008.7

 2,007.9

 2,006.9

 2,006.0

 2,004.6

 2,005.3

 2,005.8

 2,001.7

 2,002.1

 2,003.6

 2,003.9

 2,006.2

 2,008.0

 2,006.7

 2,006.0

 2,005.1

 2,005.2

 2,003.9

 2,002.1

 2,000.9

 1,999.4

 1,997.6

 1,996.0

STORAGE

-1.1

-0.6

+0.7

-0.9

+0.6

+0.3

-1.6

-0.3

-0.8

-1.0

-0.9

-1.4

+0.8

+0.4

-4.1

+0.4

+1.4

+0.3

+2.3

+1.8

-1.3

-0.7

-0.9

+0.1

-1.3

-1.8

-1.2

-1.6

-1.8

-1.5

CHANGE

1,906

1,748

2,377

2,263

2,460

2,522

2,348

2,301

2,041

2,203

2,019

2,083

3,203

2,660

2,252

1,663

3,404

2,256

1,901

1,917

1,894

1,872

1,637

2,179

2,145

1,735

2,226

2,210

1,990

1,888

INFLOW

 2,369

 1,949

 1,976

 2,643

 2,076

 2,307

 3,028

 2,390

 2,368

 2,652

 2,405

 2,708

 2,740

 2,387

 4,264

 1,440

 2,665

 2,057

 706

 949

 2,514

 2,125

 2,062

 2,062

 2,725

 2,571

 2,747

 2,913

 2,801

 2,593

POWER

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

SPILL

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

OUTLET

 97

 79

 65

 68

 104

 47

 104

 79

 65

 54

 61

 100

 72

 50

 54

 0

 14

 32

 22

 75

 50

 82

 22

 61

 90

 57

 93

 79

 82

 75

C.F.S.

 .27

 .22

 .18

 .19

 .29

 .13

 .29

 .22

 .18

 .15

 .17

 .28

 .20

 .14

 .15

 .00

 .04

 .09

 .06

 .21

 .14

 .23

 .06

 .17

 .25

 .16

 .26

 .22

 .23

 .21

INCHES

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .25

 .46

 .00

 .11

 .48

 1.35

 .06

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

PRECIP

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

APRIL 2000 NEW MELONES LAKE DAILY OPERATIONS RUN DATE: May 2, 2000

IN LAKE

EVAPORATION

INCHES

C.F.S.

COMPUTED*

1000 ACRE-FEET

RELEASE - C.F.S.

TOTALS -15.7 65,303 71,192 0 0 1,933 5.39 2.71

ACRE-FEET -15,700 129,529 141,209 0 0 3,834

COMMENTS:

* COMPUTED INFLOW IS THE SUM OF CHANGE IN STORAGE, RELEASES AND EVAPORATION.

SUMMARY

RELEASE (ACRE-FEET)

POWER 141,209

SPILL 0

OUTLET

TOTAL

 0

 141,209

PRECIPITATION

THIS MONTH =

TO DATE =

 2.71

JULY 1, 1999 29.09

 2,011.5

Table 13
#### Mary A. Tyndall, as Administratrix, etc., Respondent, v. The New York Central and Hudson River Railroad Company, Appellant.

Judgment and order unanimously affirmed, with costs.
Editorial Note on Part 25
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 25 appear by T.D. ATF-437, 66 FR 5478, 5479, Jan. 19, 2001.

§ 25.221 Voluntary destruction of beer. ( a ) *On brewery premises.* ( 1 ) A brewer may destroy, at the brewery, beer on which the tax has not been determined or paid.
( 2 ) A brewer operating a tavern on brewery premises under § 25.25 may destroy taxpaid or tax-determined beer stored on brewery premises, in accordance with the requirements of § 25.225.
( b ) *Destruction without return to brewery.* A brewer may destroy beer on which the tax has been paid or determined at a location other than any of the breweries operated by the brewer, upon compliance with this subpart.
(Sec. 201, Pub. L. 85-859, 72 Stat. 1335, as amended (26 U.S.C. 5056))
[T.D. ATF-224, 51 FR 7673, Mar. 5, 1986; 51 FR 9190, Mar. 18, 1986; T.D. ATF-268, 53 FR 8629, Mar. 16, 1988, as amended by T.D. 372, 61 FR 20724, May 8, 1996; T.D. TTB-91, 76 FR 5478, Feb. 1, 2011]
### §3993. Amendment to State application

#### (a) Application

A State shall be eligible to receive a grant under this part if—

(1) the State submits to the Secretary as part of its application under section 209 1 such information and assurances as the Secretary may require at such time as the Secretary shall establish; and

(2) the Secretary approves such application.

#### (b) Application requirements

The Secretary shall require each application to include—

(1) a description of the State's procedures relating to the use of funds from grants received under this part, including the approval process for local applications;

(2) an assurance that not more than 1 percent of the amount received shall be used for administrative expenses; and

(3) an assurance that the State will, to the extent possible, assist local school districts in economically depressed areas to obtain matching funds from business concerns.

(Pub. L. 98–377, title III, §323, as added Pub. L. 100–418, title VI, §6031(a)(2), Aug. 23, 1988, 102 Stat. 1480.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

Section 209, referred to in subsec. (a)(1), is section 209 of Pub. L. 98–377, title II, Aug. 11, 1984, 98 Stat. 1279, which was classified to section 3969 of this title prior to repeal by Pub. L. 100–297, title II, §2303, Apr. 28, 1988, 102 Stat. 324.

1 See References in Text note below.
Water Quality Standards Regulatory Revisions Rulemaking

MEMORANDUM TO RECORD

SUBJECT: Meeting with ACWA and State members of State-EPA Roundtable

DATE: Friday, August 8, 2014

TIME: 12:30 PM – 2:00 PM

Participants:

EPA – Sara Hisel-McCoy, Grace Robiou, Shari Barash, Gary Russo

ACWA/States – Melissa McCoy (ACWA), Gerry Szal (Massachusetts), Alex Barron (Virginia),

Jason Childress (Oklahoma), Tom Stiles (Kansas), Sarah Johnson (Colorado), Lindsay Patterson

(Wyoming), Nancy Sonafrank (Alaska), Susan Braley (Washington)

Summary of Meeting: State participants provided information and estimates on the

costs/burden associated with the proposed rule.