alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

DAY ELEV

 124.08

 124.41

 123.86

 123.89

 123.99

 123.88

 123.96

 123.84

 123.78

 123.51

 123.36

 123.48

 123.54

 123.71

 123.94

 124.16

 124.73

 124.59

 123.09

 123.03

 123.69

 123.61

 124.43

 124.48

 123.52

 123.29

 123.15

 123.45

 123.04

 124.43

 8,301

 8,466

 8,195

 8,209

 8,256

 8,205

 8,242

 8,186

 8,158

 8,031

 7,960

 8,017

 8,045

 8,125

 8,233

 8,341

 8,626

 8,556

 7,833

 7,805

 8,115

 8,078

 8,476

 8,501

 8,035

 7,927

 7,862

 8,003

 7,810

 8,476

STORAGE

+388

+165

-271

+14

+47

-51

+37

-56

-28

-127

-71

+57

+28

+80

+108

+108

+285

-70

-723

-28

+310

-37

+398

+25

-466

-108

-65

+141

-193

+666

CHANGE

2,108

2,002

1,774

1,966

1,935

1,880

1,921

1,877

1,888

1,838

1,869

1,936

1,920

1,947

1,950

1,957

2,049

1,871

1,572

1,905

2,064

1,887

2,104

1,923

1,669

1,850

1,857

1,954

1,779

2,608

INFLOW

 1,812

 1,818

 1,816

 1,864

 1,820

 1,815

 1,811

 1,814

 1,812

 1,811

 1,814

 1,816

 1,815

 1,816

 1,805

 1,812

 1,815

 1,823

 1,877

 1,838

 1,817

 1,815

 1,813

 1,819

 1,813

 1,813

 1,445

 1,810

 1,816

 2,212

POWER

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 354

 0

 0

 0

SPILL

 60

 60

 60

 63

 60

 60

 60

 60

 60

 60

 60

 60

 60

 60

 60

 60

 60

 60

 60

 60

 60

 60

 60

 60

 60

 60

 60

 60

 60

 60

HATCHERY

 0

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 0

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 0

 0

 0

 1

 1

 1

 0

 1

 1

 1

 1

 0

 0

 0

C.F.S.

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

NOVEMBER 2012 LAKE NATOMA DAILY OPERATIONS RUN DATE: December 3, 2012

IN LAKE

EVAP

C.F.S.

COMPUTED*

ACRE-FEET

RELEASE - C.F.S.

TOTALS +563 57,860 54,597 354 1,803 21

ACRE-FEET +563 114,765 108,293 702 3,576 42

COMMENTS:

* COMPUTED INFLOW IS THE SUM OF CHANGE IN STORAGE, RELEASES AND EVAPORATION.

SUMMARY

RELEASES (ACRE-FEET)

POWER 108,293

SPILL 702

FOLSOM SOUTH CANAL

HATCHERY

 1,589

 3,576

 7,913

FOLSOM

SOUTH 

CANAL

 40

 40

 34

 31

 30

 30

 30

 30

 30

 30

 30

 30

 30

 30

 30

 30

 30

 23

 0

 20

 30

 30

 30

 30

 30

 30

 30

 13

 0

 0

 801

 1,589

(1)

(1) INCHES OF EVAPORATION TAKEN FROM FOLSOM PAN.

RELEASES (ACRE-FEET)

TOTAL 114,160
###### Editorial Note on Part 40

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 40 appear by T.D. ATF-460, 66 FR 39094-39096, July 27, 2001; T.D. ATF-464, 66 FR 43479, Aug. 20, 2001; and T.D. TTB-91, 76 FR 5479, Feb. 1, 2011.

#### § 40.162 Semimonthly tax return.

Every manufacturer of tobacco products shall file, for each of his factories, a semimonthly tax return on Form 5000.24 for each return period, including any period during which a manufacturer begins or discontinues business. The return shall be filed with TTB in accordance with the instructions on the form. The manufacturer shall file the return at the time specified in § 40.165 regardless of whether tobacco products are removed or whether tax is due for that particular return period. However, when the manufacturer requests by letter and the appropriate TTB officer grants specific authorization, the manufacturer need not during the term of such authorization file a tax return for which tax is not due or payable.

[T.D. ATF-232, 51 FR 35353, Oct. 3, 1986; T.D. ATF-243, 51 FR 43194, Dec. 1, 1986, as amended by T.D. ATF-251, 52 FR 19339, May 22, 1987]
(No. 74-CC-233

#### John W. Castle, Special Assistant Attorney General, Claimant, *vs.*State of Illinois, Department of Transportation, Respondent.

*Opinion filed January 22, 1974.*

John W. Castle, Special Assistant Attorney General, Claimant, pro se.

William J. Scott, Attorney General; Edward L. S. Arkema, Jr., Assistant Attorney General, for Respondent.

Per Curiam.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

DAY ELEV

 1,901.36

 1,901.10

 1,901.19

 1,901.31

 1,901.35

 1,901.19

 1,901.15

 1,900.97

 1,900.83

 1,900.83

 1,900.82

 1,901.00

 1,901.04

 1,900.62

 1,900.88

 1,900.86

 1,900.95

 1,901.00

 1,901.03

 1,901.11

 1,901.22

 1,901.18

 1,900.99

 1,900.79

 1,900.84

 1,901.05

 1,900.75

 1,901.33

 1,901.28

 1,900.91

 14,180

 13,986

 14,053

 14,143

 14,173

 14,053

 14,023

 13,889

 13,786

 13,786

 13,779

 13,911

 13,941

 13,631

 13,823

 13,808

 13,874

 13,911

 13,933

 13,993

 14,076

 14,046

 13,904

 13,756

 13,793

 13,948

 13,727

 14,158

 14,120

 13,845

STORAGE

+0

-194

+67

+90

+30

-120

-30

-134

-103

+0

-7

+132

+30

-310

+192

-15

+66

+37

+22

+60

+83

-30

-142

-148

+37

+155

-221

+431

-38

-275

CHANGE

740

1,163

1,045

902

981

904

925

862

846

813

859

985

941

926

901

798

867

851

938

904

911

784

832

796

875

964

815

815

462

696

INFLOW

 100

 100

 100

 81

 100

 100

 100

 100

 100

 100

 100

 100

 100

 100

 100

 100

 100

 100

 100

 100

 100

 100

 100

 100

 100

 100

 100

 89

 100

 99

POWER

 280

 278

 279

 284

 276

 275

 274

 274

 273

 271

 273

 272

 272

 270

 271

 274

 275

 274

 273

 273

 276

 278

 277

 277

 275

 276

 276

 277

 276

 280

SPILL

 89

 89

 89

 108

 89

 89

 89

 89

 89

 89

 89

 89

 89

 89

 89

 89

 89

 89

 89

 89

 89

 89

 89

 89

 89

 89

 89

 100

 89

 88

OUTLETS

 4

 6

 7

 5

 2

 4

 5

 6

 7

 7

 6

 6

 5

 8

 6

 7

 6

 5

 5

 6

 6

 7

 7

 7

 7

 11

 8

 8

 7

 7

C.F.S.

 .20

 .28

 .32

 .21

 .09

 .19

 .24

 .26

 .34

 .30

 .29

 .28

 .25

 .36

 .27

 .32

 .26

 .23

 .21

 .28

 .28

 .34

 .31

 .33

 .34

 .49

 .37

 .38

 .32

 .31

INCHES

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

JUNE 2022 LEWISTON LAKE DAILY OPERATIONS RUN DATE: July 1, 2022

IN LAKE

EVAPORATION

C.F.S. FRANCIS CARR

COMPUTED*

ACRE-FEET

RELEASE - C.F.S. 

TOTALS -335 26,101 2,969 2,699 8,259 188 8.65

ACRE-FEET -335 51,771 5,889 5,353 16,382 373

* COMPUTED INFLOW IS THE SUM OF CHANGE IN STORAGE, RELEASES AND EVAPORATION.

(1) OUTLET RELEASE INCLUDES FISH RELEASE.

(2) INCHES OF EVAPORATION TAKEN FROM PAN AT TRINITY RIVER HATCHERY.

SUMMARY

RELEASE (ACRE-FEET)

TOTAL POWER 5,889

TOTAL RIVER 27,624 51,735

 14,180

 24,111

RIVER

JUDGE FRANCIS CARR POWERPLANT

TOTAL RELEASE

JUDGE (2)

(1) POWERPLANT

 267

 788

 536

 379

 499

 496

 472

 461

 429

 346

 395

 451

 460

 615

 338

 336

 364

 364

 460

 406

 398

 325

 431

 398

 385

 410

 453

 124

 9

 361

 12,156

 24,111
**EXHIBIT 99**

 

**OTHER EXHIBITS**

 

Exhibit 99includes the reports of Deloitte & Touche LLP relating to their audit ofAmeron’s financial statements for the period ended November 30, 2002.

 

**REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLICACCOUNTING FIRM**

 

To the Boardof Directors and Stockholders of Ameron International Corporation:

 

We haveaudited the consolidated statements of income, comprehensive income,stockholders’ equity and cash flow of Ameron International Corporation andsubsidiaries (the “Company”) for the year ended November 30, 2002.  Ouraudit also included the financial statement schedule listed in Item15(a)2. These financial statements and the financial statement schedule are theresponsibility of the Company’s management.  Our responsibility is toexpress an opinion on these financial statements and the financial statementschedule based on our audit.

 

We conductedour audit in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting OversightBoard (United States).  Those standards require that we plan and performthe audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statementsare free of material misstatement.  An audit includes examining, on a testbasis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significantestimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financialstatement presentation.  We believe that our audit provides a reasonablebasis for our opinion.

 

In ouropinion, such consolidated financial statements present fairly, in all materialrespects, the results of operation and cash flows of the Company for the yearended November 30, 2002, in conformity with accounting principlesgenerally accepted in the United States of America.  Also, in our opinion, the financial statementschedule referred to above, when considered in relation to the basicconsolidated financial statements taken as a whole, presents fairly in all materialrespects the information set forth therein.

 

Deloitte &Touche LLP

Los Angeles,California

February 3,2003 (February 24, 2004 as to the effects of the stock split described inNote 16)

 

1

----
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY ELEV

 359.80

 359.80

 359.80

 359.80

 359.80

 359.80

 359.80

 359.80

 359.80

 359.80

 359.80

 359.80

 359.80

 359.79

 359.79

 359.79

 359.79

 359.79

 359.77

 359.79

 359.79

 359.79

 359.79

 359.75

 359.79

 359.79

 359.79

 359.80

 359.79

 359.77

 359.77

 523

 523

 523

 523

 523

 523

 523

 523

 523

 523

 523

 523

 523

 522

 522

 522

 522

 522

 521

 522

 522

 522

 522

 520

 522

 522

 522

 523

 522

 521

 521

STORAGE

+2

+0

+0

+0

+0

+0

+0

+0

+0

+0

+0

+0

+0

-1

+0

+0

+0

+0

-1

+1

+0

+0

+0

-2

+2

+0

+0

+1

-1

-1

+0

CHANGE

 346

 431

 476

 441

 410

 410

 442

 426

 426

 393

 412

 438

 406

 386

 432

 431

 451

 462

 460

 426

 401

 377

 413

 401

 446

 420

 437

 497

 453

 451

 451

 203

 203

 202

 205

 205

 203

 203

 205

 203

 204

 204

 203

 203

 202

 202

 203

 203

 202

 203

 200

 205

 204

 203

 204

 200

 205

 202

 201

 207

 204

 201

SPILL

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

OUTLET

OAKDALE IRRIGATION DISTRICT

SOUTH SAN JOAQUIN IRRIGATION DISTRICT

TRI DAMS PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

JULY 2020 GOODWIN RESERVOIR DAILY OPERATIONS RUN DATE: August 1, 2020

RES.

ACRE-FEET

RELEASE - C.F.S. 

TOTALS +0 0 6,297 13,252

ACRE-FEET +0 0 12,490 26,285

SUMMARY

RELEASE (ACRE-FEET)

JOINT MAIN CANAL 60,221

SOUTH MAIN CANAL 26,285

 98,996

 521

OUTLET 0

TOTAL 

TULLOCH

RELEASE

 1,665

 1,793

 1,855

 1,825

 1,774

 1,772

 1,779

 1,766

 1,783

 1,722

 1,722

 1,763

 1,748

 1,722

 1,812

 1,797

 1,803

 1,892

 1,882

 1,830

 1,781

 1,794

 1,849

 1,826

 1,866

 1,822

 1,819

 1,867

 1,858

 1,862

 1,884

 55,933

 110,943

JOINT MAIN OPERATED BY SSJID AND OID.

JOINT

MAIN

SOUTH

MAIN

SPILL 12,490

 908

 948

 953

 969

 978

 979

 950

 951

 945

 925

 907

 945

 944

 936

 971

 950

 925

 988

 990

 989

 988

 1,035

 1,034

 1,022

 1,024

 1,029

 1,012

 1,003

 1,050

 1,058

 1,055

 30,361

 60,221

RIVER CANALS
###### Editorial Note on Part 40

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 40 appear by T.D. ATF-460, 66 FR 39094-39096, July 27, 2001; T.D. ATF-464, 66 FR 43479, Aug. 20, 2001; and T.D. TTB-91, 76 FR 5479, Feb. 1, 2011.

#### § 40.215 Notice for cigarettes.

Every package of cigarettes shall, before removal subject to tax, have adequately imprinted thereon, or on a label securely affixed thereto, the designation “cigarettes”, the quantity of such product contained therein, and the classification for tax purposes, i.e., for small cigarettes, either “small” or “Class A”, and for large cigarettes, either “large” or “Class B”.

(72 Stat. 1422; 26 U.S.C. 5723)
§ 24.47 Execution of IRS Form SS-4. ( a ) *Preparation.* The application on IRS Form SS-4, together with any supplementary statement, will be prepared in accordance with the form instructions and applicable regulations. The application will be filed with the director of the internal revenue service center as instructed on the Form SS-4.
( b ) *Signature.* The application will be signed by: ( 1 ) The individual, if the taxpayer is an individual; or,
( 2 ) The president, vice president, other principal officer, or other person authorized to sign, if the taxpayer is a corporation; or,
( 3 ) A responsible and duly authorized member or officer having knowledge of its affairs, if the taxpayer is a partnership or other unincorporated organization; or,
( 4 ) The fiduciary, if the taxpayer is a trust or estate. (Pub. L. 87-397, 75 Stat. 828, as amended (26 U.S.C. 6109))
(Approved by the Office of Management and Budget under control number 1512-0492)
§ 19.474 Spirits for nonindustrial use. ( a ) *Containers.* A proprietor may fill spirits for nonindustrial use into packages or into other containers that are filled during processing operations, if consistent with the provisions of part 5 of this chapter.
( b ) *Bottles and labels.* The provisions of subpart T of this part and part 5 of this chapter govern the liquor bottles and labels that a proprietor must use in bottling spirits for nonindustrial domestic use.
( c ) *Cases.* If spirits for nonindustrial use are in containers with a capacity of one gallon or less the proprietor must place the containers in cases constructed to afford reasonable protection against breakage.
(26 U.S.C. 5206, 5212, 5301)
#### § 24.231 Receipt of spirits in sealed bulk containers.

The proprietor shall examine sealed bulk containers (packages) of spirits received at the bonded wine premises to verify that the containers are the same as those described on the transfer record accompanying the shipment. Any container which appears to have been tampered with or from which spirits appear to have been removed or lost will be gauged by the proprietor and the proprietor shall prepare and submit to the appropriate TTB officer a statement setting forth fully the circumstances and apparent cause of any loss.

(Sec. 201, Pub. L. 85-859, 72 Stat. 1381, as amended, 1382, as amended (26 U.S.C. 5366, 5367, 5368, 5373))

(Approved by the Office of Management and Budget under control numbers 1512-0292 and 1512-0298)

[T.D. ATF-299, 55 FR 24989, June 19, 1990, as amended by T.D. ATF-409, 64 FR 13683, Mar. 22, 1999]
#### § 7.126 Depictions of government symbols.

*Representations of the armed forces or flags.* Malt beverage labels, containers, or packaging may not show an image of any government's flag or any representation related to the armed forces of the United States if the representation, standing alone or considered together with any additional language or symbols on the label, creates a false or misleading impression that the product was endorsed by, made by, used by, or made under the supervision of the government represented by that flag or by the armed forces of the United States. This section does not prohibit the use of a flag as part of a claim of American origin or another country of origin.
###### Editorial Note on Part 479

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 479 appear by T.D. ATF-487, 68 FR 3752, Jan. 24, 2003.

#### § 479.87 Cancellation of stamp.

The method of cancellation of the stamp required by this subpart as prescribed in § 479.67 shall be used.
* Pursuant to 5TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit 

## FILED February 7, 2007 Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 05-51545 Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus JESUS ROGELIO NAVAREZ-PINEDA, Defendant-Appellant.

-------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas USDC No. 3:05-CR-1580-ALL

-------------------- Before KING, HIGGINBOTHAM, and GARZA, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: * Jesus Rogelio Navarez-Pineda appeals his 46-month sentence of imprisonment imposed following his guilty-plea conviction for illegal reentry into the United States following deportation, in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326. He argues that his sentence was unreasonable because the district court failed to properly weigh the sentencing factors set forth in 18 U.S.C. § 3553(a) and imposed a term of imprisonment greater than necessary to satisfy the sentencing goals set forth in § 3553(a).No. 05-51545 -2- Navarez-Pineda’s sentence was within a properly calculated advisory guideline range and is presumed reasonable. See United States v. Alonzo , 435 F.3d 551, 554 (5th Cir. 2006). Giving “great deference” to such a sentence, and recognizing that the sentencing court considered all the factors for a fair sentence under § 3553(a), we conclude that Navarez-Pineda has failed to rebut the presumption that his sentence was reasonable. See id. Navarez-Pineda argues for the first time on appeal that in light of Apprendi v. New Jersey , 530 U.S. 466 (2000), the 46- month term of imprisonment imposed in his case exceeds the statutory maximum sentence allowed for the § 1326(a) offense charged in his indictment. He challenges the constitutionality of § 1326(b)’s treatment of prior felony and aggravated felony convictions as sentencing factors rather than elements of the offense that must be found by a jury. Navarez-Pineda’s constitutional challenge is foreclosed by Almendarez-Torres v. United States , 523 U.S. 224, 235 (1998). Although he contends that Almendarez-Torres was incorrectly decided and that a majority of the Supreme Court would overrule Almendarez-Torres in light of Apprendi , we have repeatedly rejected such arguments on the basis that Almendarez-Torres remains binding. See United States v. Garza-Lopez , 410 F.3d 268, 276 (5th Cir.), cert. denied , 126 S. Ct. 298 (2005). NavarezPineda properly concedes that his argument is foreclosed in lightNo. 05-51545 -3- of Almendarez-Torres and circuit precedent, but he raises it here to preserve it for further review.
AFFIRMED.
Exhibit 10.38


                                 FIRST AMENDMENT
                             TO EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT
                             DATED SEPTEMBER 9, 1998



     Reference  is  made  to the  Executive  Employment  Agreement  dated  as of
September 9, 1998 (the  "Agreement")  by and between J. Baker,  Inc. and Michael
Fine.  Pursuant to paragraph 19 of the  Agreement  and in order to further amend
certain provisions of the Agreement, the Agreement is hereby amended as follows:

         1.  Paragraph 6 of the  Agreement  is hereby  amended by  deleting  the
phrase "ending on September 9, 2000" in the fourth line thereof and inserting in
its place the phrase "ending on April 30, 2001".

         2. Paragraph 9  subparagraph  (d) of the Agreement is hereby amended by
inserting the following at the end of such subparagraph:

                  ";  provided,  however,  that any such salary in excess of one
         (1)  year of Base  Salary  shall  be  offset  by any  salary  or  other
         compensation  earned by the Employee  from other  employment;  it being
         understood  that the Employee shall use reasonable  efforts to find new
         employment suitable to his training and experience."

         3. All other terms of the Agreement shall remain unchanged and continue
in full force and effect.



J. BAKER, INC.



By:/s/Alan I. Weinstein                                  4/7/99
-----------------------                                  ------
Alan I. Weinstein                                        Date
President and
Chief Executive Officer



/s/ Michael Fine                                         4/12/99
----------------                                         -------
Michael Fine                                             Date
Exhibit 31.1

                                  CERTIFICATION

I, Jeffrey F. Joseph, Chief Executive Officer of Presidential Realty Corporation
(the "Company") certify that:

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of the Company;

2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any
   untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact
   necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances
   under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to
   the period covered by this quarterly report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
   information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all
   material respects the financial condition, results of operations and
   cash flows of the Company as of, and for, the periods presented in
   this quarterly report;

4. The Company's other certifying officers and I are responsible for
   establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as
   defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the
   Company and we have:

      a)   designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that
           material information relating to the Company, including its
           consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those
           entities, particularly during the period in which this quarterly
           report is being prepared;

      b)   evaluated the effectiveness of the Company's disclosure controls and
           procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the
           effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the
           end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation;
           and

      c)   disclosed in this report any changes in the Company's internal
           control over financial reporting that occurred during the Company's
           most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is
           reasonably likely to materially affect, the Company's internal
           control over financial reporting; and

5. The Company's other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our
   most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to
   the Company's auditors and the Audit Committee of the Company's Board of
   Directors:

      a)  all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
          operation of internal control over financial reporting which are
          reasonably likely to adversely affect the Company's ability to record,
          process, summarize and report financial information; and

      b)  any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
          employees who have a significant role in the Company's internal
          control over financial reporting.



  DATE:   November 7, 2007            By: /s/ Jeffrey F. Joseph
                                      --------------------------
                                      Jeffrey F. Joseph
                                      Chief Executive Officer
§ 7.25 Rules regarding certificates of label approval (COLAs) for malt beverages imported in containers. ( a ) *What a COLA authorizes.* An approved TTB Form 5100.31 authorizes the use of the labels covered by the certificate of label approval (COLA) on containers of malt beverages, as long as the container bears labels identical to the labels appearing on the face of the COLA, or labels with changes authorized by the form or otherwise authorized by TTB (such as through the issuance of public guidance available on the TTB website at *https://www.ttb.gov*).
( b ) *When to obtain a COLA.* The COLA must be obtained prior to the removal of malt beverages in containers from customs custody for consumption.
( c ) *Application for a COLA.* The person responsible for the importation of malt beverages must obtain approval of the labels by submitting an application to TTB on Form 5100.31. A person may apply for a COLA either electronically by accessing TTB's online system, COLAs Online, at *https://www.ttb.gov* or by submitting the paper form. For procedures regarding the issuance of COLAs, see part 13 of this chapter.
Administrative Rules