alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 9
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1999
<CASH>                                           9,010
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                               0
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                 1,465
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                     90,100
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                           9,838
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                             9,716
<LOANS>                                        173,403
<ALLOWANCE>                                      3,021
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 295,958
<DEPOSITS>                                     236,175
<SHORT-TERM>                                    24,974
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                                313
<LONG-TERM>                                      8,774
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         2,803
<OTHER-SE>                                      22,919
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>                 295,958
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                 11,144
<INTEREST-INVEST>                                4,719
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                   188
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                                16,051
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                               6,194
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               7,229
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                            8,822
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                      544
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                   0
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                  6,203
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  3,030
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                       2,281
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     2,281
<EPS-BASIC>                                        .81
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .81
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    4.09
<LOANS-NON>                                        586
<LOANS-PAST>                                        36
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                     0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                      0
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                 3,033
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                      764
<RECOVERIES>                                       208
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                                3,021
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                             3,021
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                          1,194


</TABLE>
Editorial Note on Part 46
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 46 appear by T.D. ATF-457, 66 FR 32220, 32221, June 14, 2001.

§ 46.132 Credit for incorrect stamp. ( a ) *General.* The appropriate TTB officer may credit the tax (including additions thereto) paid for an incorrect stamp if the taxpayer has filed an amended return showing the correct tax on TTB Form 5630.5t and has, with the amended return, surrendered the incorrect stamp for credit.
( b ) *Underpayment.* Where the correct tax (including any additions thereto) exceeds the incorrect tax paid, the appropriate TTB officer may credit the tax paid against the correct tax upon remittance of the difference between the tax paid and the correct tax plus any additions thereto.
( c ) *Overpayment.* Where the tax (and additions thereto) paid for the surrendered incorrect stamp exceeds the amount due, the appropriate TTB officer will advise the taxpayer to file a claim for refund of that excess on TTB Form 5620.8. Sections 46.136 through 46.138 apply to all claims for refund.
(26 U.S.C. 6402, 6511)
#### § 31.4 Relation to State and municipal law.

Compliance with the requirements of this part shall not be held to exempt any person from any penalty or punishment provided by the laws of any State for carrying on any trade or business within such State, or in any manner to authorize the commencement or continuance of such trade or business contrary to the laws of such State or in places prohibited by municipal law; nor shall such compliance be held to prohibit any State from placing a duty or tax on the same trade or business, for State or other purposes.
#### Lena B. Robertson, Respondent, v. Arthur C. Robertson, Appellant.

Order affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, with leave to defendant to serve amended answer on payment of costs. Ho opinion. Present—Ingraham, P. J., McLaughlin, Laughlin, Clarke and Scott, JJ.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
***RESTATED FINANCIAL DATA SCHEDULE***
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS AND CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS FOUND ON
PAGES 1,2 AND 3 OF THE COMPANY'S FORM 10-Q FOR THE YEAR-TO-DATE, AND IS
QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1997
<CASH>                                           5,277
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    4,605
<ALLOWANCES>                                       114
<INVENTORY>                                      6,540
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                17,012
<PP&E>                                           1,046
<DEPRECIATION>                                     250
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  18,648
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            4,704
<BONDS>                                          5,329
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            50
<OTHER-SE>                                       8,442
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    18,648
<SALES>                                          2,773
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 2,773
<CGS>                                            1,039
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    1,039
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 1,840
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 159
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  (265)
<INCOME-TAX>                                      (88)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              (177)
<DISCONTINUED>                                   2,691
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     2,514
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .51<F1>
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .44<F1>
<FN>
<F1>WE HAVE CALCULATED PER SHARE AMOUNTS IN ACCORDANCE WITH FAS 128 "EARNINGS PER
SHARE".  WE HAVE ENTERED BASIC AND DILUTED AMOUNTS IN PLACE OF PRIMARY AND
FULLY DILUTED, RESPECTIVELY.
</FN>
        

</TABLE>
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

DAY ELEV

 502.84

 503.07

 503.54

 504.10

 504.51

 505.10

 505.67

 506.55

 507.43

 508.35

 509.28

 509.82

 510.62

 510.85

 510.75

 510.75

 510.46

 511.10

 512.28

 512.67

 512.75

 512.96

 513.68

 514.68

 515.76

 516.17

 516.49

 516.75

 517.03

 517.12

 224.1

 224.8

 226.2

 227.9

 229.2

 231.0

 232.7

 235.4

 238.2

 241.1

 244.0

 245.7

 248.3

 249.0

 248.7

 248.7

 247.8

 249.8

 253.6

 254.9

 255.1

 255.8

 258.2

 261.5

 265.0

 266.4

 267.5

 268.3

 269.3

 269.6

STORAGE

+1.5

+0.7

+1.4

+1.7

+1.3

+1.8

+1.8

+2.7

+2.7

+2.9

+2.9

+1.7

+2.6

+0.7

-0.3

+0.0

-0.9

+2.0

+3.8

+1.3

+0.3

+0.7

+2.4

+3.3

+3.6

+1.4

+1.1

+0.9

+0.9

+0.3

CHANGE

1,255

866

1,171

1,269

1,060

1,350

1,326

1,814

1,833

1,878

1,885

1,270

1,740

830

275

490

71

1,567

2,455

1,180

671

804

1,590

2,066

2,218

1,102

993

922

956

637

INFLOW

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

MADERA

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

SPILL

 303

 305

 243

 200

 230

 252

 254

 256

 259

 231

 212

 214

 264

 271

 250

 308

 349

 349

 353

 356

 356

 278

 222

 224

 227

 228

 270

 300

 301

 301

FRIANT-KERN

 5

 7

 6

 8

 9

 7

 6

 4

 10

 9

 7

 7

 4

 7

 7

 3

 10

 7

 5

 6

 4

 3

 2

 4

 6

 3

 1

 1

 1

 1

C.F.S.

 .05

 .07

 .06

 .08

 .09

 .07

 .06

 .04

 .10

 .09

 .07

 .07

 .04

 .07

 .07

 .03

 .10

 .07

 .05

 .06

 .04

 .03

 .02

 .04

 .06

 .03

 .01

 .01

 .01

 .01

INCHES

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .02

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .11

 .00

PRECIP

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

NOVEMBER 2000 MILLERTON LAKE DAILY OPERATIONS RUN DATE: January 28, 2002

IN LAKE

EVAPORATION

INCHES

C.F.S.

COMPUTED*

1000 ACRE-FEET

RELEASE - C.F.S. 

TOTALS +47.0 37,544 0 8,166 0 160 1.60 .13

ACRE-FEET +46,953 74,469 0 16,197 0 317

COMMENTS:

* COMPUTED INFLOW IS THE SUM OF CHANGE IN STORAGE, RELEASES, PUMPING AND EVAPORATION.

SUMMARY

RELEASE (ACRE-FEET)

CANALS

FRIANT-KERN

MADERA

 16,197

 0 27,197

PRECIPITATION

THIS MONTH =

JULY 1, 2000 TO DATE = 3.80

 222.6

 11,000 0.13

CANALS

AT FRIANT

TOTAL RELEASES

OUTLET

 205

 205

 205

 205

 190

 182

 182

 182

 183

 184

 184

 184

 185

 182

 179

 179

 179

 179

 179

 180

 180

 180

 180

 181

 182

 182

 182

 182

 182

 182

RIVER

 5,546

 11,000

RIVER
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE

JOSEPH M. WALLS,

Defendant Below,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF DELAWARE,

Plaintiff Below,

Appellee.

§

§ No. 74, 2018

§ 

§ Court Below—Superior Court

§ of the State of Delaware

§ 

§ ID. No. 86001399DI (N)

§

§

§

§

Submitted: April 23, 2018

 Decided: June 5, 2018

Before VALIHURA, VAUGHN, and SEITZ, Justices.

O R D E R

This 5th day of June 2018, after careful consideration of the opening brief, the 

motion to affirm, and the record on appeal, the Court concludes that the judgment of 

the Superior Court should be affirmed on the basis of and for the reasons assigned 

by the Superior Court in its August 9, 2017 order denying the appellant’s motion for 

reduced sentence resentencing and its January 17, 2018 order denying the appellant’s 

motion for reargument. The Superior Court did not err in finding that the appellant, 

who was not sentenced as an habitual offender under 11 Del. C. § 4214, was not 

eligible for relief under § 4214(f). 
2

NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS ORDERED that the judgment of the Superior 

Court is AFFIRMED. 

BY THE COURT:

/s/ James T. Vaughn, Jr.

Justice
### §3485. Seal of Department

The Secretary shall cause a seal of office to be made for the Department of such design as the Secretary shall approve. Judicial notice shall be taken of such seal.

(Pub. L. 96–88, title IV, §425, Oct. 17, 1979, 93 Stat. 688.)
### §5204. Authorization of appropriations

To provide a permanent endowment for the Eisenhower Exchange Fellowship Program, there are authorized to be appropriated to the Eisenhower Exchange Fellowships Program Trust Fund—

(1) $5,000,000; and

(2) the lesser of—

(A) $2,500,000, or

(B) an amount equal to contributions to Eisenhower Exchange Fellowships, Incorporated, from private sector sources during the 4-year period beginning on October 24, 1990.

(Pub. L. 101–454, §5, Oct. 24, 1990, 104 Stat. 1064.)
### §2413. State administrative costs

#### (a) General rule

Except as provided in subsection (b), for each fiscal year for which an eligible agency receives assistance under this chapter, the eligible agency shall provide, from non-Federal sources for the costs the eligible agency incurs for the administration of programs under this chapter, an amount that is not less than the amount provided by the eligible agency from non-Federal sources for such costs for the preceding fiscal year.

#### (b) Exception

If the amount made available from Federal sources for the administration of programs under this chapter for a fiscal year (referred to in this section as the "determination year") is less than the amount made available from Federal sources for the administration of programs under this chapter for the preceding fiscal year, then the amount the eligible agency is required to provide from non-Federal sources for costs the eligible agency incurs for the administration of programs under this chapter for the determination year under subsection (a) shall bear the same ratio to the amount the eligible agency provided from non-Federal sources for such costs for the preceding fiscal year, as the amount made available from Federal sources for the administration of programs under this chapter for the determination year bears to the amount made available from Federal sources for the administration of programs under this chapter for the preceding fiscal year.

(Pub. L. 88–210, title II, §223, formerly title III, §323, as added Pub. L. 109–270, §1(b), Aug. 12, 2006, 120 Stat. 745; renumbered title II, §223, Pub. L. 115–224, title II, §201(a)(5), (7), July 31, 2018, 132 Stat. 1621.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Prior Provisions

A prior section 2413, Pub. L. 88–210, title III, §323, as added Pub. L. 105–332, §1(b), Oct. 31, 1998, 112 Stat. 3124, related to State administrative costs, prior to the general amendment of this chapter by Pub. L. 109–270.

Another prior section 2413, Pub. L. 88–210, title IV, §413, as added Pub. L. 101–392, title IV, §406(a), Sept. 25, 1990, 104 Stat. 813, authorized establishment of demonstration centers for training of dislocated workers, prior to the general amendment of this chapter by Pub. L. 105–332.

Another prior section 2413, Pub. L. 88–210, title IV, §413, as added Pub. L. 98–524, §1, Oct. 19, 1984, 98 Stat. 2471, related to program of competitive grants to State boards for State programs involving loan of high-technology, state-of-the-art equipment to eligible recipients for use in local vocational education programs, prior to the general amendment of part B of former subchapter IV of this chapter by Pub. L. 101–392.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date of 2018 Amendment

Amendment by Pub. L. 115–224 effective July 1, 2019, see section 4 of Pub. L. 115–224, set out as a note under section 2301 of this title.
Presidential Documents

Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 68 / Friday, April 8, 2011 / Presidential Documents 19893 

Memorandum of April 6, 2011 

Unified Command Plan 2011 

Memorandum for the Secretary of Defense 

Pursuant to my authority as Commander in Chief, I hereby approve and 

direct the implementation of the revised Unified Command Plan. 

Consistent with title 10, United States Code, section 161(b)(2) and title 

3, United States Code, section 301, you are directed to notify the Congress 

on my behalf. 

You are authorized and directed to publish this memorandum in the Federal 

Register. 

THE WHITE HOUSE, 

Washington, April 6, 2011 

[FR Doc. 2011–8644 

Filed 4–7–11; 11:15 am] 

Billing code 5000–04–P 


jlentini on DSKJ8SOYB1PROD with FRO0OB#1.EPS</GPH>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS  SCHEDULE  CONTAINS  SUMMARY  FINANCIAL   INFORMATION  EXTRACTED  FROM  THE
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS FOR THE 12 MONTHS ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 1997 AND IS QUALIFIED
IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          SEP-30-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             OCT-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1997
<CASH>                                             106
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                   106
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                     106
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          508,661
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       532,676
<OTHER-SE>                                 (1,041,231)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                       106
<SALES>                                         41,873
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                41,873
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                45,166
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (3,293)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (3,293)
<EPS-BASIC>                                          0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0


</TABLE>
Exhibit 31.2

                                  CERTIFICATION

I, Thomas Viertel, Chief Financial Officer of Presidential Realty Corporation
(the "Company") certify that:

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of the Company;

2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any
   untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact
   necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances
   under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to
   the period covered by this quarterly report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
   information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all
   material respects the financial condition, results of operations and
   cash flows of the Company as of, and for, the periods presented in
   this quarterly report;

4. The Company's other certifying officers and I are responsible for
   establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as
   defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the
   Company and we have:

     a)    designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that
           material information relating to the Company, including its
           consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those
           entities, particularly during the period in which this quarterly
           report is being prepared;

     b)    evaluated the effectiveness of the Company's disclosure controls and
           procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the
           effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the
           end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation;
           and

     c)    disclosed in this report any changes in the Company's internal
           control over financial reporting that occurred during the Company's
           most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is
           reasonably likely to materially affect, the Company's internal
           control over financial reporting; and

5. The Company's other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our
   most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to
   the Company's auditors and the Audit Committee of the Company's Board of
   Directors:

     a)   all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
          operation of internal control over financial reporting which are
          reasonably likely to adversely affect the Company's ability to record,
          process, summarize and report financial information; and

     b)   any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
          employees who have a significant role in the Company's internal
          control over financial reporting.


  DATE:  August 12, 2005          By: /s/ Thomas Viertel
                                      --------------------------
                                      Thomas Viertel
                                      Chief Financial Officer
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 19-1513

NELSON L. BRUCE,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

v.

PENTAGON FEDERAL CREDIT UNION, a/k/a PenFed Credit Union,

Defendant - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at 

Charleston. Bruce H. Hendricks, District Judge. (2:17-cv-02170-BHH)

Submitted: July 16, 2019 Decided: July 18, 2019

Before MOTZ, WYNN, and DIAZ, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Nelson L. Bruce, Appellant Pro Se. Nicholas Thomas Moraites, ECKERT SEAMANS 

CHERIN & MELLOTT, LLC, Washington, D.C., for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Nelson L. Bruce appeals the district court’s text order denying his motion to 

compel arbitration and his Fed. R. Civ. P. 60(b) motion seeking relief from the court’s 

prior judgment dismissing his civil complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no 

reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. 

Bruce v. Pentagon Fed. Credit Union, No. 2:17-cv-02170-BHH (D.S.C. May 3, 2019). 

We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately 

presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional 

process.

AFFIRMED