alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
###### Editorial Note on Part 71

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 71 appear by T.D. ATF-414, 64 FR 49084, Sept. 10, 1999and T.D. ATF-463, 66 FR 42734, 42735, Aug. 15, 2001.

#### § 71.116 Review by Administrator.

The Administrator, on appeal on petition for review, shall afford a reasonable opportunity for the submission of proposed findings, conclusions or exceptions with reasons in support thereof and an opportunity for oral argument. He may alter or modify any finding of the administrative law judge (or of the appropriate TTB officer in application proceedings) and may affirm, reverse, or modify the decision of the administrative law judge (or of the appropriate TTB officer in initial application proceedings), or he may remand the case for further hearing, but he shall not consider evidence which is not a part of the record. Appeals and petitions for review shall not be decided by the Administrator in any proceeding in which he has engaged in investigation or prosecution, and in such event he shall so state his disqualification in writing and refer the record to the Under Secretary for appropriate action. The Under Secretary may designate an Assistant Secretary or one of his principal aides to consider any proceeding instead of the Administrator. The original copy of the decision on review shall be placed in the official record of the proceeding, a signed duplicate original shall be served upon the applicant or respondent and a copy shall be transmitted to the appropriate TTB officer. When, on appeal, the Administrator affirms the decision of the appropriate TTB officer or the administrative law judge, as the case may be, disapproving an application or suspending, revoking or annulling a permit, such action shall not supersede the decision of the appropriate TTB officer or the administrative law judge and such decision shall be final.

(26 U.S.C. 7805 (68A Stat. 917), 27 U.S.C. 205 (49 Stat. 981 as amended), 18 U.S.C. 926 (82 Stat. 959), and Sec. 38, Arms Export Control Act (22 U.S.C. 2778, 90 Stat. 744))

[21 FR 1441, Mar. 6, 1956. Redesignated at 40 FR 16835, Apr. 15, 1975, and amended by T.D. ATF-48, 43 FR 13531, Mar. 31, 1978; T.D. ATF-199, 50 FR 9197, Mar. 6, 1985; T.D. ATF-374, 61 FR 29957, June 13, 1996]
###### Editorial Note on Part 41

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 41 (formerly part 275) appear at T.D. ATF-460, 66 FR 39093, July 27, 2001.

#### § 41.220 Change in individual name.

When there is a change in the name of an individual operating under a permit as an importer of tobacco products, the importer must, within 30 days of the change, submit an application on TTB F 5230.5 for an amended permit.
Exhibit 32.1

** **

** **

** **

                               Certification of CEO and CFO

**                            Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,**

**                                  As Adopted Pursuant to**

**                       Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**

 

 

 

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of National Housing Partnership Realty Fund I (the "Partnership"), for the quarterly period ended June 30, 2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), Steven D. Cordes, as the equivalent of the chief executive officer of the Partnership, and Stephen B. Waters, as the equivalent of the chief financial officer of the Partnership, each hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of his knowledge:

 

(1)   The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2)   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Partnership.

 

 
|   |      /s/Steven D. Cordes  |
|--------|----------------------------------------------------|
|   | Name: Steven D. Cordes                             |
|   | Date: August 13, 2009                              |
|   |                                               |
|   |      /s/Stephen B. Waters |
|   | Name: Stephen B. Waters                            |
|   | Date: August 13, 2009                              |

 

 

This certification is furnished with this Report pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not be deemed filed by the Partnership for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 07-6623

RICHARD EDWARD BRILLHART,

Petitioner - Appellant,

versus

TRACY W. JOHNS,

Respondent - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern

District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Louise W. Flanagan, Chief

District Judge. (5:07-hc-02055-FL)

Submitted: September 13, 2007 Decided: September 18, 2007

Before GREGORY and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges, and WILKINS, Senior

Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Richard Edward Brillhart, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
- 2 -

PER CURIAM:

Richard Edward Brillhart, a federal prisoner, appeals the

district court’s orders denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2241

(2000) petition and subsequent Fed. R. Civ. P. 59(e) motion for

reconsideration. We have reviewed the record and find no

reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by

the district court. See Brillhart v. Stansberry, No. 5:07-hc02055-FL (E.D.N.C. April 16, 2007 & April 20, 2007). We deny

Brillhart’s motion to file a formal brief. We dispense with oral

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately

presented in the materials before the court and argument would not

aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
#### Italian Cook Oil Corp., Appellant, v. Alan Porter Lee, Inc., Respondent.

Motion for reargument denied, with $10 costs. Present — Lewis, P. J., Carswell, Johnston, Adel and Sneed, JJ. [See *ante,*p. 916.]
###### Editorial Note on Part 26

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 26 appear by T.D. ATF-451, 66 FR 21668, 21669, May 1, 2001.

#### § 26.75 TTB Form 5000.23 PR, Notice of Termination of Bond.

When the appropriate TTB officer is satisfied that any bond given under the provisions of this subpart may be terminated, he shall issue TTB Form 5000.23 PR, Notice of Termination of Bond, and shall forward copies to the principal and to the surety. The appropriate TTB officer shall, prior to the termination date, notify the Secretary and the revenue agent of the proposed termination of any bond given under this part and the date of such termination.

[T.D. 6695, 28 FR 12932, Dec. 5, 1963, as amended by T.D. ATF-2, 37 FR 22736, Oct. 21, 1972. Redesignated at 40 FR 16835, Apr. 15, 1975, and amended by T.D. ATF-251, 52 FR 19338, May 22, 1987; T.D. TTB-146, 82 FR 1132, Jan. 4, 2017]
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

DAY ELEV

 1,029.26

 1,029.09

 1,028.85

 1,028.77

 1,028.69

 1,028.65

 1,028.63

 1,028.60

 1,028.55

 1,028.52

 1,028.50

 1,028.47

 1,028.51

 1,028.55

 1,028.59

 1,028.57

 1,028.65

 1,028.74

 1,028.70

 1,028.66

 1,028.76

 1,028.91

 1,029.20

 1,029.36

 1,029.49

 1,029.49

 1,029.48

 1,029.68

 1,030.04

 1,030.25

 1,755.1

 1,753.4

 1,750.9

 1,750.1

 1,749.3

 1,748.9

 1,748.7

 1,748.4

 1,747.8

 1,747.5

 1,747.3

 1,747.0

 1,747.4

 1,747.8

 1,748.3

 1,748.0

 1,748.9

 1,749.8

 1,749.4

 1,749.0

 1,750.0

 1,751.5

 1,754.5

 1,756.1

 1,757.4

 1,757.4

 1,757.3

 1,759.4

 1,763.1

 1,765.2

STORAGE

-1.2

-1.7

-2.5

-0.8

-0.8

-0.4

-0.2

-0.3

-0.5

-0.3

-0.2

-0.3

+0.4

+0.4

+0.4

-0.2

+0.8

+0.9

-0.4

-0.4

+1.0

+1.5

+3.0

+1.6

+1.3

+0.0

-0.1

+2.0

+3.7

+2.2

CHANGE

460

409

322

291

243

407

243

363

205

303

277

298

308

266

270

473

469

534

456

594

895

808

1,549

840

702

37

579

1,063

2,342

1,121

INFLOW

 1,024

 1,220

 1,502

 649

 598

 544

 287

 461

 396

 401

 330

 393

 40

 7

 5

 8

 5

 5

 6

 11

 14

 14

 14

 14

 14

 14

 14

 14

 14

 14

POWER

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

SPILL

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 495

 0

 0

 600

 723

 308

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 600

 0

 442

 0

OUTLET

 56

 66

 56

 53

 56

 69

 59

 56

 66

 56

 49

 59

 63

 53

 59

 73

 53

 66

 56

 66

 59

 23

 40

 0

 17

 23

 17

 17

 27

 20

C.F.S.

 .17

 .20

 .17

 .16

 .17

 .21

 .18

 .17

 .20

 .17

 .15

 .18

 .19

 .16

 .18

 .22

 .16

 .20

 .17

 .20

 .18

 .07

 .12

 .00

 .05

 .07

 .05

 .05

 .08

 .06

INCHES

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 1.25

 .60

 1.60

 .02

 .00

 .00

 .55

 .93

 1.91

PRECIP

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

NOVEMBER 2018 NEW MELONES LAKE DAILY OPERATIONS RUN DATE: December 3, 2018

IN LAKE

EVAPORATION

INCHES

C.F.S.

COMPUTED*

1000 ACRE-FEET

RELEASE - C.F.S.

TOTALS +8.9 17,127 8,032 0 3,168 1,433 4.34 6.86

ACRE-FEET +8,900 33,971 15,931 0 6,284 2,842

COMMENTS:

* COMPUTED INFLOW IS THE SUM OF CHANGE IN STORAGE, RELEASES AND EVAPORATION.

SUMMARY

RELEASE (ACRE-FEET)

POWER 15,931

SPILL 0

OUTLET

TOTAL

 6,284

 22,215

PRECIPITATION

THIS MONTH =

TO DATE =

 6.86

JULY 1, 2018 7.43

 1,756.3

Table 13 

OCT 1, 2018 TO DATE = 7.43
### SUBCHAPTER VII—BILINGUAL EDUCATION PROGRAMS
IPM Files -- MATS Policy Case: 6 of 6 

 12/09/2011 04:48 PM 

From: Erich Eschmann/DC/USEPA/US Sort List... 

 

To: Cortney_Higgins@omb.eop.gov 

 

Cc: RobertJ Wayland/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA, Bill Maxwell/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA, 

Kevin Culligan/DC/USEPA/US@EPA, Sam Napolitano/DC/USEPA/US@EPA, Jeb 

Stenhouse/DC/USEPA/US@EPA, Mikhail Adamantiades/DC/USEPA/US@EPA 

Erich Eschmann 

Clean Air Markets Division 

U.S. EPA, Office of Air and Radiation 

 

202 343-9128 Phone 

202 343-2359 Fax 

eschmann.erich@epa.gov

ParsedFile_MATS_Policy_Case_2015.zip
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

EASTERN DISTRICT

STACEY ELLA REDMOND,

Petitioner

v.

BUREAU OF ADMINISTRATIVE 

ADJUDICATION,

Respondent

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 485 EAL 2018

Petition for Allowance of Appeal from 

the Order of the Commonwealth Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 3rd day of April, 2019, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal and 

the Application for Leave to File a Response are DENIED.
###### Editorial Note on Part 70

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 70 appear by T.D. ATF-450, 66 FR 29022-29030, May 29, 2001.

#### § 70.333 Offenses by officers and employees of the United States.

Any officer or employee of the United States acting in connection with any provisions of 26 U.S.C. enforced and administered by the Bureau required to make a written report under the provisions of 26 U.S.C. 7214(a)(8) shall submit such report to the appropriate TTB officer.

(26 U.S.C. 7214)

[T.D. ATF-301, 55 FR 47653, Nov. 14, 1990, as amended by T.D. ATF-450, 66 FR 29028, May 29, 2001]
OREGON

Source Data: USFWS Division of Realty, USGS, National Geographic

Map Info: NAD 1983 UTM Zone 10N

Transverse Mercator 1:21253

Software: ESRI ArcGIS 8.1

Date: May 1, 2003

Map Design: Khemarith So, Mariana Lincoln

0.5 0 0.5

Miles

Oregon Coast National Wildlife Refuge Complex

2127 SE OSU Drive

Newport, OR 97365

541 867 4550

Land Acquisition Status

Refuge Lands

Authorized Refuge Boundary

U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service

National Wildlife Refuge

Bandon Marsh

Land Status
### §1655. Uniform rules of evidence of racial discrimination

The rules of evidence required to prove that State or local authorities are practicing racial discrimination in assigning students to public schools shall be uniform throughout the United States.

(Pub. L. 92–318, title VIII, §805, June 23, 1972, 86 Stat. 372.)
Editorial Note on Part 30
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 30 appear by T.D. ATF-438, 66 FR 5481, Jan. 19, 2001.

§ 30.41 Bulk spirits. When spirits (including denatured spirits) are to be gauged by weight in bulk quantities, the weight shall be determined by means of weighing tanks, mounted on accurate scales. Before each use, the scales shall be balanced at zero load; thereupon the spirits shall be run into the weighing tank and proofed as prescribed in § 30.31. However, if the spirits are to be reduced in proof, the spirits shall be so reduced before final determination of the proof. The scales shall then be brought to a balanced condition and the weight of the spirits determined by reading the beam to the nearest graduation mark. From the weight and the proof thus ascertained, the quantity of the spirits in proof gallons shall be determined by reference to Table 4. However, in the case of spirits which contain solids in excess of 600 milligrams per 100 milliliters, the quantity in proof gallons shall be determined by first ascertaining the wine gallons per pound of the spirits and multiplying the wine gallons per pound by the weight, in pounds, of the spirits being gauged and by the true proof (determined as prescribed in § 30.31) and dividing the result by 100. The wine gallons per pound of spirits containing solids in excess of 600 milligrams per 100 milliliters shall be ascertained by: ( a ) Use of a precision hydrometer and thermometer, in accordance with the provisions of § 30.23, to determine the apparent proof of the spirits (if specific gravity at the temperature of the spirits is not more than 1.0) and reference to Table 4 for the wine gallons per pound, or
( b ) Use of a specific gravity hydrometer, in accordance with the provisions of § 30.25, to determine the specific gravity of the spirits (if the specific gravity at the temperature of the spirits is more than 1.0) and dividing that specific gravity (corrected to 60 degrees Fahrenheit) into the factor 0.120074 (the wine gallons per pound for water at 60 degrees Fahrenheit). When withdrawing a portion of the contents of a weighing tank, the difference between the quantity (ascertained by proofing and weighing) in the tank immediately before the removal of the spirits and the quantity (ascertained by proofing and weighing) in the tank immediately after the removal of the spirits shall be the quantity considered to be withdrawn.
(Sec. 201, Pub. L. 85-859, 72 Stat. 1358, as amended (26 U.S.C. 5204))
[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 11 (Tuesday, January 18, 2011)]
[Notices]
[Page 2913]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2011-875]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


National Cancer Institute; Amended Notice of Meeting

    Notice is hereby given of a change in the meeting of the National 
Cancer Institute Special Emphasis Panel, January 24, 2011, 5 p.m. to 
January 26, 2011, 5 p.m., Bethesda North Marriott Hotel & Conference 
Center, 5701 Marinelli RD, Bethesda, MD, 20852 which was published in 
the Federal Register on November 24, 2010, 75 FR 71713.
    This notice is amending the meeting from three days to two days. 
The new date and time of this meeting is January 25, 2011, 8 a.m. to 
January 26, 2011, 5 p.m. The meeting is closed to the public.

    Dated: January 11, 2011.
Jennifer S. Spaeth,
Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. 2011-875 Filed 1-14-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-P
**Exhibit 32.2**

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO**

**18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION**

**OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

I, Sam Singer, Chief Financial Officer of Bio-Reference Laboratories, Inc.(the “Company”), do hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, asadopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

(a)                                  the AnnualReport on Form 10-K of the Company for the fiscal year ended October 31 2009,which this certification accompanies (the “Periodic Report”), fully complieswith the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;and

 

(b)                                 based on myknowledge, the information contained in the Periodic Report fairly presents, inall material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of theCompany.

 

 

Dated:January 7, 2010

 

 
|   | /S/ Sam Singer                   |
|--------|----------------------------------|
|   | Sam Singer                       |
|   | Chief Financial Officer          |
|   | Bio-Reference Laboratories,  Inc |

 

----
Exhibit 32.1

                      Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
                             As Adopted Pursuant to Section 906
                              Of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

      In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Presidential
Realty Corporation (the "Company") for the period ending June 30, 2008, as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
"Report"), I, Jeffrey F. Joseph, Chief Executive Officer of the Company,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:

         (1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)or
             15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934: and

         (2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
             material respects, the financial condition and the results of
             operations of the Company.



                                     Presidential Realty Corporation

                                     By:/s/ Jeffrey F. Joseph
                                     --------------------------
                                     Jeffrey F. Joseph
                                     Chief Executive Officer




         Date: August 8, 2008
<PAGE>   1
                                                                Exhibit 16.1


                    [TERRENCE J. DUNNE, MBA, MST LETTERHEAD]



January 21, 1998


Securities and Exchange Commission
450 Fifth Street, N.W.
Washington, D.C. 20549


Gentlemen:

I have read the statements made by PAN Environmental Corporation, which I
understand will be filed with the Commission pursuant to Part II, Item 8 of
Form 10-KSB as part of the company's Form 10-KSB for the fiscal years ended
December 31, 1994, 1995, 1996 and 1997, and in the subsequent reports under the
Securities and Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. I agree with the statement
concerning my firm in the Form 10-KSB.



Sincerely, 

/s/ TERRENCE J. DUNNE
---------------------------
Terrence J. Dunne
Certified Public Accountant
###### Editorial Note on Part 40

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 40 appear by T.D. ATF-460, 66 FR 39094-39096, July 27, 2001; T.D. ATF-464, 66 FR 43479, Aug. 20, 2001; and T.D. TTB-91, 76 FR 5479, Feb. 1, 2011.

#### § 40.168 Remittance with return.

Except when an electronic fund transfer has been made under § 40.165a for the full amount of tax due, the tax on tobacco products shown to be due and payable on any return shall be paid by remittance in full with the tax return. The remittance may be in the form which the appropriate TTB officer is authorized to accept under § 70.61 of this chapter (Payment by check or money order) and which is acceptable to him, except as otherwise specified in § 40.166. Checks and money orders shall be made payable to the “Alcohol and Tobacco Tax and Trade Bureau”. In paying the tax, a fractional part of a cent shall be disregarded unless it amounts to one-half cent or more, in which case it shall be increased to one cent.

(68A Stat. 778, 72 Stat. 1417; 26 U.S.C. 6313, 5703; Aug. 16, 1954, ch. 736, 68A Stat. 707, as amended (26 U.S.C. 5703))

[T.D. 6871, 31 FR 35, Jan. 4, 1966. Redesignated at 40 FR 16835, Apr. 15, 1975, and amended by T.D. ATF-48, 44 FR 55855, Sept. 28, 1979; T.D. ATF-77, 46 FR 3009, Jan. 13, 1981; T.D. ATF-232, 51 FR 28081, Aug. 5, 1986; T.D. ATF-243, 51 FR 43194, Dec. 1, 1986; T.D. ATF-301, 55 FR 47658, Nov. 14, 1990]
§ 5.81 General. ( a ) *Application.* The labeling practices, statements, and representations in this subpart may be used on distilled spirits labels only when used in compliance with this subpart. In addition, if any of the practices, statements, or representations in this subpart are used elsewhere on containers or in packaging, they must comply with the requirements of this subpart. For purposes of this subpart: ( 1 ) The term “label” includes all labels on distilled spirits containers on which mandatory information may appear, as set forth in § 5.61(a), as well as any other label on the container.
( 2 ) The term “container” includes all parts of the distilled spirits container, including any part of a distilled spirits container on which mandatory information may appear, as well as those parts of the container on which information does not satisfy mandatory labeling requirements, as set forth in § 5.61(b).
( 3 ) The term “packaging” includes any carton, case, carrier, individual covering or other packaging of such containers used for sale at retail, but does not include shipping cartons or cases that are not intended to accompany the container to the consumer.
( b ) *Statement or representation.* For purposes of the practices in this subpart, the term “statement or representation” includes any statement, design, device, or representation, and includes pictorial or graphic designs or representations as well as written ones. The term “statement or representation” includes explicit and implicit statements and representations.
Food Allergen Labeling
C OURT OF A PPEALS FOR THE
F IRST D ISTRICT OF T EXAS AT H OUSTON

O RDER

Appellate case name: Darryl Dwayne Farley v. Doretha Lenett Edwards

Appellate case number: 01

- 20

- 00018

- CV

Trial court case number: 2002

- 46326

Trial court: 245th District Court of Harris County

Appellant, Darryl Dwayne Farley

, has filed a Statement of Inability to Afford Payment of

Court Costs or an Appea l Bond

. T he Court abates this appeal for the trial court to hold a hearing

to hear evidence and issue findings of fact to determ ine w hether appellant is indigent

. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 2 0.1(b)(3). The court coordinator of the tr ial court shall set a date for said hearing

within 30 days of the date of this Order and notify the parties, including appellant. If appellant is

now incarce rated

, he may appear by closed vi deo teleconference. 1 The trial court shall have a court reporter, or court recorder, record the hearing and file the reporter’s record with this Court no later than 30 days from the date of th e indigency hearing. The trial cour t clerk shall file a
clerk’s record containing the trial court’s findings no later than 30 days from the date of th e indigency hearing.

The appeal is abated, treated as a closed case, and removed from this Court’s active docket. The appeal will be rei nsta ted on this Court’s active do cke t when the clerk’s record and reporter’s record of the hearing are filed with this Court.

It is so ORDERED.

Judge’s signature:

___________ /s/ Russell Lloyd

___________ Acting individually

Date: January 23, 2020

1 Any such teleconference must use a closed

- circuit video teleconferencing system that provides for a simultaneous compressed full motion video and interactive communication of image and sound between the trial court, appellant, and any a t torneys repre sentin g the State or appellant. On request, appellant and

hi s counsel shall be able to communicate privately without being recorded or heard by the trial court or the attorney representing the State.