alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

DAY ELEV

 1,051.93

 1,051.78

 1,051.50

 1,051.23

 1,050.97

 1,050.77

 1,050.36

 1,049.95

 1,049.61

 1,049.28

 1,049.14

 1,048.95

 1,048.63

 1,048.17

 1,047.88

 1,047.66

 1,047.32

 1,047.01

 1,046.75

 1,046.50

 1,046.18

 1,045.85

 1,045.59

 1,045.30

 1,045.10

 1,045.02

 1,044.97

 1,044.80

 1,044.79

 1,045.04

 1,996.3

 1,994.6

 1,991.5

 1,988.5

 1,985.7

 1,983.5

 1,979.0

 1,974.4

 1,970.7

 1,967.1

 1,965.6

 1,963.5

 1,960.0

 1,955.0

 1,951.8

 1,949.4

 1,945.7

 1,942.3

 1,939.5

 1,936.8

 1,933.3

 1,929.7

 1,926.9

 1,923.8

 1,921.6

 1,920.8

 1,920.2

 1,918.4

 1,918.3

 1,921.0

STORAGE

-4.9

-1.7

-3.1

-3.0

-2.9

-2.2

-4.5

-4.5

-3.7

-3.6

-1.5

-2.1

-3.5

-5.0

-3.2

-2.4

-3.7

-3.4

-2.8

-2.7

-3.5

-3.6

-2.8

-3.1

-2.2

-0.9

-0.5

-1.8

-0.1

+2.7

CHANGE

3,237

3,748

3,847

3,477

3,436

3,277

3,003

3,361

3,685

3,267

3,044

3,023

2,831

2,772

3,168

3,090

3,054

2,946

3,129

3,584

3,553

3,484

3,412

3,814

4,367

4,649

4,391

4,380

4,331

5,055

INFLOW

 5,610

 4,553

 5,398

 4,936

 4,836

 4,368

 5,227

 5,581

 5,500

 5,063

 3,746

 4,022

 4,520

 5,246

 4,668

 4,269

 4,879

 4,588

 4,454

 4,878

 5,230

 5,199

 4,739

 5,294

 5,356

 4,960

 4,541

 5,196

 4,287

 3,611

POWER

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

SPILL

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

OUTLET

 82

 29

 7

 43

 46

 18

 50

 53

 64

 28

 71

 50

 74

 60

 95

 28

 42

 60

 98

 74

 74

 88

 91

 101

 101

 126

 122

 108

 98

 84

C.F.S.

 .23

 .08

 .02

 .12

 .13

 .05

 .14

 .15

 .18

 .08

 .20

 .14

 .21

 .17

 .27

 .08

 .12

 .17

 .28

 .21

 .21

 .25

 .26

 .29

 .29

 .36

 .35

 .31

 .28

 .24

INCHES

 .00

 .36

 .29

 .00

 .00

 .04

 .00

 .00

 .09

 .08

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .23

 .05

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

PRECIP

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

APRIL 2019 NEW MELONES LAKE DAILY OPERATIONS RUN DATE: May 6, 2019

IN LAKE

EVAPORATION

INCHES

C.F.S.

COMPUTED*

1000 ACRE-FEET

RELEASE - C.F.S.

TOTALS -80.2 106,415 144,755 0 0 2,065 5.87 1.14

ACRE-FEET -80,200 211,074 287,122 0 0 4,096

COMMENTS:

SUMMARY

RELEASE (ACRE-FEET)

POWER 287,122

SPILL 0

OUTLET

TOTAL

 0

 287,122

PRECIPITATION

THIS MONTH =

TO DATE =

 1.14

JULY 1, 2018 37.88

 2,001.1

Table 13 

OCT 1, 2018 TO DATE = 37.88
(No. 74-CC-325

#### West Publishing Company, Claimant, *vs.*State of Illinois, Office of the Comptroller, Respondent.

*Opinion filed February 20, 1974.*

West Publishing Company, Claimant, pro se.

William J. Scott, Attorney General; Howard W. Feldman, Assistant Attorney General, for Respondent.

Per Curiam.
Third Department,

March, 1914.

#### Effie M. Ainsworth, as Administratrix, etc., of William I. Ainsworth, Deceased, Respondent, *v.*The New York Central and Hudson River Railroad Company, Appellant.

Negligence— death— *damages.*

Appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court, entered in the Albany county clerk’s office on the 10th day of October, 1913, upon the verdict of a jury for $16,500, and also from an order entered on the 22d day of October, 1913.

Judgment and order reversed and new trial granted, with .costs to appellant to abide event, unless the plaintiff stipulates to reduce the verdict to $12,000, and if she so stipulates the judgment is modified and as so modified judgment and order affirmed, without costs. All concurred, except Woodward, J., who voted for affirmance in opinion, in which Howard, J., concurred.

Woodward, J.

(dissenting): I vote to affirm this judgment, and expressly dissent from that part of the decision which provides for a reduction of the amount of the recovery. In my judgment this is not a case calling for any such action by this court. The plaintiff’s intestate was a man of forty-two years of age, intelligent, fairly well educated, sober and industrious, a respected member of society. He was actually *911earning at the time of his death $1,200 per annum, and had all the chances of a good American citizen to increase this amount indefinitely. He left a widow and two young children, the latter of the ages of twelve and seven years respectively. The breadwinner of this family is dead by the negligent act of the defendant. The actual financial loss possibly largely exceeds the recovery, and the loss to these children of the companionship, advice, counsel and guidance of a good father is difficult to overestimate. A jury of twelve men has fixed what I regal'd as a reasonable sum. The litigation has been protracted and expensive, and I do not think the alternative should be forced upon the plaintiff of accepting a reduction or the burden of a new trial. Howard, J., concurred.
United States Court of Appeals

For the First Circuit

 

No. 05-2562

WEIPING ZHENG,

Petitioner,

v.

ALBERTO GONZALES, ATTORNEY GENERAL,

Respondent.

 

ERRATA SHEET

The opinion of this court issued on September 26, 2006 is amended as follows:

On the cover sheet, line 38, replace "Sin Wong" with "Siu Wong."
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             APR-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-2000
<CASH>                                            4872
<SECURITIES>                                     46788
<RECEIVABLES>                                   136335
<ALLOWANCES>                                    (1031)
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                186964
<PP&E>                                            5096
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  192060
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           168774
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                          1694
<OTHER-SE>                                       21592
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    192060
<SALES>                                           6641
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                  7141
<CGS>                                             2517
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                     2517
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                  2536
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                    39
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 782
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                   1267
<INCOME-TAX>                                       306
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                961
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       961
<EPS-BASIC>                                        .71
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .71


</TABLE>
WARNING: THE EDGAR SYSTEM ENCOUNTERED ERROR(S) WHILE PROCESSING THIS SCHEDULE.

<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THE SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM the Company's
Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheet as of December 29, 1995, and its Condensed
Consolidated Statement of Operations for the Third Fiscal Quarter Ended December
29, 1995, which were filed with the SEC on February 12, 1996 on Form 10-Q for
the quarter ended December 29, 1995 (commission file number 1-9037) AND IS 
QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   QTR-3
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAR-31-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-29-1995
<CASH>                                          24,127
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  140,031
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               182,665
<PP&E>                                         156,238
<DEPRECIATION>                                  98,385
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 329,633
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           93,223
<BONDS>                                         65,052
<COMMON>                                        35,764
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                      2,400
<OTHER-SE>                                     102,385
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   329,633
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               104,912
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   99,283
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                24,595
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               1,529
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (20,495)
<INCOME-TAX>                                  (15,808)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (4,687)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (4,687)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.16)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
Exhibit
32.2





CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS
ENACTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002








In
connection with the Quarterly Report of United Bancorp, Inc. (the "Company") on
Form 10-Q for the period ending March 31, 2009 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Randall M. Greenwood,
Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350,
as enacted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:








(1)  The
Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)  The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.







/s/Randall M.
Greenwood





Randall
M. Greenwood,


Chief
Financial Officer





May 15,
2009
###### Editorial Note on Part 70

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 70 appear by T.D. ATF-450, 66 FR 29022-29030, May 29, 2001.

#### § 70.142 Scope of definitions.

Except as otherwise provided by § 70.143 of this part, the definitions provided by §§ 70.143 apply for purposes of § 70.142 through 70.149 and §§ 70.231 through 70.234 of this part.
### Part 3—Hearings and Advice Concerning Negotiations
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA

DA 21-0299

_________________

STATE OF MONTANA,

 Plaintiff and Appellee,

 v.

ZACHARY ALAN RIVERS,

 Defendant and Appellant.

O R D E R

_________________

Pursuant to the Internal Operating Rules of this Court, this cause is classified for 

submission on briefs to a five-justice panel of this Court. 

The Clerk is directed to provide a copy hereof to all counsel of record and to the 

Honorable John C. Brown, District Judge.

For the Court,

Electronically signed by:

Mike McGrath

Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

January 5 2022

01/05/2022

Case Number: DA 21-0299
(No. 73-CC-454

#### Webber Manufacturing Co., Inc., Claimant, *vs.*State of Illinois, Department of Transportation, Respondent.

*Opinion filed August 15, 1973.*

Webber Manufacturing Co., Claimant, pro se.

*51William J. Scott, Attorney General; William E. Webber, Assistant Attorney General, for Respondent.

Per Curiam.
###### Editorial Note on Part 40

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 40 appear by T.D. ATF-460, 66 FR 39094-39096, July 27, 2001; T.D. ATF-464, 66 FR 43479, Aug. 20, 2001; and T.D. TTB-91, 76 FR 5479, Feb. 1, 2011.

#### § 40.212 Mark.

Every package of tobacco products packaged in a domestic factory shall, before removal subject to tax, have adequately imprinted thereon, or on a label securely affixed thereto, a mark as specified in this section. The mark may consist of the name of the manufacturer removing the product subject to tax and the location (by city and State) of the factory from which the products are to be so removed, or may consist of the permit number of the factory from which the products are to be so removed. (Any trade name of the manufacturer approved as provided in § 40.65 may be used in the mark as the name of the manufacturer.) As an alternative, where tobacco products are packaged and removed subject to tax by the same manufacturer, either at the same or different factories, the mark may consist of the name of such manufacturer if the factory where packaged is identified on or in the package by a means approved by the appropriate TTB officer. Before using the alternative, the manufacturer shall notify the appropriate TTB officer in writing of the name to be used as the name of the manufacturer and the means to be used for identifying the factory where packaged. If approved by him the appropriate TTB officer shall return approved copies of the notice to the manufacturer. A copy of the approved notice shall be retained as part of the factory records at each of the factories operated by the manufacturer.

(72 Stat. 1422; 26 U.S.C. 5723)

[T.D. 6871, 31 FR 36, Jan. 4, 1966. Redesignated at 40 FR 16835, Apr. 15, 1975; T.D. ATF-232, 51 FR 28081, Aug. 5, 1986; T.D. ATF-243, 52 FR 43194, Dec. 1, 1986]
EXHIBIT 31.1

                                 CERTIFICATIONS

I, Eric Danon, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this quarterly  report on Form 10-QSB of Elva  International,
Inc.

2. Based on my  knowledge,  this  quarterly  report  does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact  necessary to make
the statements made, in light of the  circumstances  under which such statements
were made, not  misleading  with respect to the period covered by this quarterly
report.

3.  Based  on my  knowledge,  the  financial  statements,  and  other  financial
information  included in this quarterly  report,  fairly present in all material
respects the financial  condition,  results of operations  and cash flows of the
registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report.

4.  The  registrant's  other  certifying  officers  and  I are  responsible  for
establishing and maintaining  disclosure  controls and procedures (as defined in
exchange act rules 13a-14 and 15d- 14) for the registrant and have:

     A) designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material
information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries,
is made known to us by others  within those  entities,  particularly  during the
period in which this quarterly report is being prepared;

     B) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's  disclosure controls and
procedures  as of a date  within  90  days  prior  to the  filing  date  of this
quarterly report (the "evaluation date"); and

     C)  presented  in  this  quarterly   report  our   conclusions   about  the
effectiveness of the disclosure  controls and procedures based on our evaluation
as of the evaluation date;

5. The registrant's other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our
most recent evaluation,  to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of
registrant's   board  of  directors  (or  persons   performing   the  equivalent
functions):

     A) all  significant  deficiencies  in the design or  operation  of internal
controls  which  could  adversely  affect  the  registrant's  ability to record,
process,  summarize  and  report  financial  data  and have  identified  for the
registrant's auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and

     B) any fraud,  whether or not material,  that involves  management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal controls.

6. The  registrant's  other  certifying  officers  and I have  indicated in this
quarterly  report  whether or not there  were  significant  changes in  internal
controls or in other factors that could  significantly  affect internal controls
subsequent to the date of our most recent  evaluation,  including any corrective
actions with regard to significant deficiencies and material weaknesses.

Date: May 27, 2005

/s/ Eric Danon
-----------------------------------------------
Eric Danon
Chief Executive Officer (or equivalent thereof)
Chief Financial Officer (or equivalent thereof)
§ 5.25 Rules regarding certificates of label approval (COLAs) for distilled spirits imported in containers. ( a ) *What COLA authorizes.* An approved TTB Form 5100.31 authorizes the use of the labels covered by the certificate of label approval (COLA) on containers of distilled spirits, as long as the container bears labels identical to the labels appearing on the face of the COLA, or labels with changes authorized by the form or otherwise authorized by TTB (such as through the issuance of public guidance available on the TTB website at *https://www.ttb.gov*).
( b ) *When to obtain a COLA.* The COLA must be obtained prior to the removal of distilled spirits in containers from customs custody for consumption.
( c ) *Application for a COLA.* The person responsible for the importation of distilled spirits must obtain approval of the labels by submitting an application to TTB on TTB Form 5100.31. A person may apply for a COLA either electronically, by accessing TTB's online system, COLAs Online, at *https://www.ttb.gov ,* or by submitting the paper form. For procedures regarding the issuance of COLAs, see part 13 of this chapter.
Administrative Rules
#### In the Matter of Roy T. Olsen, Respondent, against Paul L. Ross et al., Constituting the Temporary City Housing Rent Commission of the City of New York, Appellants.

Order, on reargument, annulling determination of the temporary city housing rent commission, which denied respondent’s application for a certificate of eviction, and directing the issuance of such a certificate, reversed on the law and the facts, without costs, and the petition dismissed, without costs, upon the authority of *Matter of Wallaeh*v. *Boss (post,*p. .1021, decided herewith). Lewis, P. J., Johnston, Adel, Sneed and Wenzel, JJ., coni cur. [191 Mise. 704.]
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY HIGH

 571

 559

 511

 471

 459

 503

 535

 593

 789

 944

 875

 1,080

 1,028

 971

 760

 686

 678

 617

 654

 817

 931

 1,052

 1,307

 1,609

 1,304

 1,339

 1,507

 1,735

 1,914

 1,529

 1,473

 282

 283

 270

 298

 287

 287

 303

 284

 301

 303

 326

 318

 343

 352

 353

 333

 340

 329

 336

 358

 373

 374

 376

 411

 398

 377

 364

 386

 406

 479

 474

 385

 365

 355

 361

 355

 367

 364

 372

 424

 478

 465

 521

 546

 507

 465

 452

 450

 421

 437

 477

 519

 556

 610

 701

 662

 665

 717

 792

 911

 813

 749

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

OCTOBER 2006 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: November 3, 2006

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

14 DAY

ACCUM

MEAN

14 DAY 

AVG

MEAN

 5,207

 5,206

 5,191

 5,190

 5,197

 5,198

 5,217

 5,240

 5,311

 5,411

 5,490

 5,625

 5,766

 5,865

 5,945

 6,032

 6,127

 6,187

 6,269

 6,379

 6,534

 6,718

 6,904

 7,127

 7,324

 7,468

 7,639

 7,924

 8,370

 8,731

 9,030

 372

 372

 371

 371

 371

 371

 373

 374

 379

 387

 392

 402

 412

 419

 425

 431

 438

 442

 448

 456

 467

 480

 493

 509

 523

 533

 546

 566

 598

 624

 645

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

JERSEY POINT TOP ON THE SAN JOAQUIN RIVER
### TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

NO. 03

- 19

- 00910

- CV

S. J., Appellant

v. Texas Department of Family and Protective Services, Appellee

FROM THE 146TH DISTR ICT COURT OF BELL CO UNTY NO. 303,297

- B, THE H ONORABLE JACK WELDON JONES, J U DGE PRESIDING

O R D E R

PER CURIAM The reporter’s record in this appeal was originally due to be filed on
December 20, 2019

. By request to this Court dated December 23 , 2019 , Betsy Clifton requested
an extension of time

. The Texas Rules of Appell a te Procedure prohibit this Court from granting extensions of over 10 days for the filing of reporters’ records in accelerated appeals, including
those from suits for termina tion of parental rights. See Tex. R. App. P. 35.3(c). Further, any
extensions of time granted for the filing of the reporters’ records may not exceed 30 days cumulatively. See Tex. R. App. P. 28.4(b)(2). Accordingly, Betsy Clifton is hereby or dered tofile the reporter’s record in this case on or before January 21, 20 20 . If the reco rd is not filed by that date, Clifton may be required to show cause why she should not be held in contempt of

court.
It is ordered on January 9 , 2020

.

Before Chief Justice Rose, Justices Baker and Triana
Editorial Note on Part 447
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 447 appear by T.D. ATF-487, 68 FR 3748, Jan. 24, 2003.

§ 447.53 Exemptions. ( a ) The provisions of this part are not applicable to: ( 1 ) Importations by the United States or any agency thereof;
( 2 ) Importation of components for items being manufactured under contract for the Department of Defense; or
( 3 ) Importation of articles (other than those which would be “firearms” as defined in 18 U.S.C. 921(a)(3) manufactured in foreign countries for persons in the United States pursuant to Department of State approval.
( b ) Any person seeking to import articles on the U.S. Munitions Import List as exempt under paragraph (a)(2) or (3) of this section may obtain release of such articles from Customs custody by submitting, to the Customs officer with authority to release, a statement claiming the exemption accompanied by satisfactory proof of eligibility. Such proof may be in the form of a letter from the Department of Defense or State, as the case may be, confirming that the conditions of the exemption are met.
[T.D. ATF-8, 39 FR 3251, Jan. 25, 1974, as amended by T.D. ATF-215, 50 FR 42162, Oct. 18, 1985]