alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
### §1092c. Simplification of lending process for borrowers

#### (a) All like loans treated as one

To the extent practicable, and with the cooperation of the borrower, eligible lenders shall treat all loans made to a borrower under the same section of part B as one loan and shall submit one bill to the borrower for the repayment of all such loans for the monthly or other similar period of repayment. Any deferments on one such loan will be considered a deferment on the total amount of all such loans.

#### (b) One lender, one guaranty agency

To the extent practicable, and with the cooperation of the borrower, the guaranty agency shall ensure that a borrower only have one lender, one holder, one guaranty agency, and one servicer with which to maintain contact.

(Pub. L. 89–329, title IV, §485C, as added Pub. L. 102–325, title IV, §488, July 23, 1992, 106 Stat. 624.)
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
 Washington, D.C. 20549
 FORM 8-K
 CURRENT REPORT
Pursuant to Section 13 OR 15(d) of The Securities Exchange Act of 1934
 Date of Report (Date of earliest event reported): June 29, 2011
 G-III APPAREL GROUP, LTD.
  Delaware

0-18183

41-1590959(State or other jurisdiction
of incorporation)

(Commission File Number)

(IRS Employer Identification No.)
 512 Seventh Avenue
New York, New York

10018(Address of principal executive offices)

(Zip Code)
 (212) 403-0500
 Not Applicable
 (Former name or former address, if changed since last report.)
  o

Written communications pursuant to Rule 425 under the Securities Act (17 CFR 230.425)o

Soliciting material pursuant to Rule 14a-12 under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.14a-12)o

Pre-commencement communications pursuant to Rule 14d-2(b) under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.14d-2(b))o

Pre-commencement communications pursuant to Rule 13e-4(c) under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.13e-4(c))




---



##### 



Item 1.01 Entry into a Material Definitive Agreement.
      Item 5.02 Departure of Directors or Certain Officers; Election of Directors; Appointment of
Certain Officers; Compensatory Arrangements of Certain Officers.




---



##### 



Item 9.01 Financial Statements and Exhibits.
 Exhibits




---



##### 



SIGNATURE
  G-III APPAREL GROUP, LTD.Date: July 1, 2011
    By:
    /s/ Neal S. NackmanName:
    Neal S. NackmanTitle:
    Chief Financial Officer




---



##### 



Exhibit
    
    Description10.1
    
    Form of Deferred Stock Award Agreement for June 29, 2011 restricted
stock unit grants.
EXHIBIT 10.28





SUNGARD DATA SYSTEMS INC.


SUMMARY DESCRIPTION OF THE COMPANYS


LONG-TERM EXECUTIVE INCENTIVE COMPENSATION PLAN





SunGard Data Systems Inc. has a long-term incentive
compensation plan for its executive officers and other key management employees. The principal purposes of this plan are to further align the interests of the executives and key employees with those of the Companys stockholders and to further
reward successful performance.





The plan currently involves the grant of performance accelerated stock options
(PASOs) to purchase shares of the Companys common stock. PASOs are nonqualified options (i.e., will not qualify as incentive stock options for tax purposes) that are granted annually at the beginning of a three-year
performance period and have a term of ten years beginning on the date of grant. Shares vest under PASOs nine and one-half years after the date of grant, except that vesting may be accelerated in part or in full at the end of the three-year
performance period to the extent certain financial performance goals are met. In addition, if performance goals for the three-year performance period are exceeded, the recipient will receive additional cash compensation upon the completion of the
three-year performance period. Beginning in 2002, the performance period of each PASO will change from three years to one year, although shares will still vest nine and one-half years after the date of grant and vesting may be accelerated in part or
in full at the end of three years to the extent that the stated one-year financial performance goals are met.





The number of
option shares granted to each participant under a PASO is determined on the basis of an analysis of competitive equity compensation programs, and is subject to subjective adjustments based upon individual factors. The financial performance goals for
each PASO are based upon the cumulative growth, during the performance period covered by the PASO, in the operating income of the business unit(s) managed by the participant, with the growth targets for all PASOs, taken together, being consistent
with the Companys overall growth objectives.





The Company currently plans, but will have no legal obligation or
commitment, to continue granting such PASOs (or comparable awards) on an annual basis, subject to approval by the Equity Award Subcommittee of the Compensation Committee of the Companys Board of Directors.
Editorial Note on Part 44
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 44 appear by T.D. ATF-464, 66 FR 43480, Aug. 20, 2001, and T.D. ATF-480, 67 FR 30801-30803, May 8, 2002.

§ 44.73 Emergency variations from requirements. The appropriate TTB officer may approve methods of operation other than as specified in this part, where he finds that an emergency exists and the proposed variations from the specified requirements are necessary, and the proposed variations— ( a ) Will afford the security and protection to the revenue intended by the prescribed specifications,
( b ) Will not hinder the effective administration of this part, and
( c ) Will not be contrary to any provision of law. Variations from requirements granted under this section are conditioned on compliance with the procedures, conditions, and limitations set forth in the approval of the application. Failure to comply in good faith with such procedures, conditions, and limitations shall automatically terminate the authority for such variations and the manufacturer, export warehouse proprietor, or customs warehouse proprietor, thereupon shall fully comply with the prescribed requirements of regulations from which the variations were authorized. Authority for any variations may be withdrawn whenever in the judgment of the appropriate TTB officer the revenue is jeopardized or the effective administration of this part is hindered by the continuation of such variation. Where a manufacturer or proprietor desires to employ such variation, he shall submit a written application to the appropriate TTB officer. The application shall describe the proposed variations and set forth the reasons therefor. Variations shall not be employed until the application has been approved. The manufacturer or proprietor shall retain, as part of his records, any authorization of the appropriate TTB officer under this section.
[T.D. 6871, 31 FR 50, Jan. 4, 1966. Redesignated at 40 FR 16835, Apr. 15, 1975; T.D. ATF-480, 67 FR 30801, May 8, 2002]
### SUBCHAPTER II—NATIONAL EDUCATION REFORM LEADERSHIP, STANDARDS, AND ASSESSMENTS
Erika L. Morabito (VSB No. 44369) 

Brittany J. Nelson (VSB No. 81734) 

QUINN EMANUEL URQUHART & SULLIVAN LLP 

1300 I Street, N.W., Suite 900 

Washington, DC 20005 

(202) 538-8334 (telephone)

Special Counsel to the Chapter 7 Trustee 

UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT 

EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA 

Richmond Division 

In re: 

 LeClairRyan PLLC, 

Debtor. 

Case No. 19-34574-KRH 

Chapter 7 

Lynn L. Tavenner, Chapter 7 Trustee, 

Plaintiff, 

v. 

ULX Partners, LLC, ULX Manager, LLC, 

UnitedLex Corporation, and Gary LeClair, 

Defendants. 

Adv. Pro. No. 20-03142-KRH 

JOINT STIPULATION FOR DISMISSAL 

Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1)(A)(ii) Plaintiff Lynn L. Tavenner, not 

individually, but solely in her capacity as the duly appointed Chapter 7 trustee (the “Trustee” or 

herein “Plaintiff”) of the bankruptcy estate of LeClairRyan PLLC in the above-referenced Chapter 

7 case, and Defendant Gary LeClair (the “Defendant”) hereby stipulate to the dismissal with 

prejudice of Defendant Gary LeClair from this adversary proceeding, including the dismissal with 

prejudice of Defendant Gary LeClair from Counts X, XI, XII, XIII, XIV, XV, XVI, XVII, XVIII, 

XIX, XXIII, XXVI, XXIX, XXX, XXXI, and the dismissal with prejudice of all counterclaims 

Case 20-03142-KRH Doc 130 Filed 01/18/22 Entered 01/18/22 14:11:53 Desc Main

Document Page 1 of 2
10750-00003/13159050.1 2 

asserted by Defendant. As evidenced by the endorsements herein, the Trustee and the Defendant 

each consents to this dismissal. Accordingly, all counts in this adversary proceeding against 

Defendant Gary LeClair are hereby dismissed with prejudice and all the counterclaims filed by the 

Defendant are hereby dismissed with prejudice. 

Dated: January 18, 2022 Respectfully submitted, 

/s/ Brittany J. Nelson 

Erika L. Morabito (VSB No. 44369) 

Brittany J. Nelson (VSB No. 81734) 

QUINN EMANUEL URQUHART & 

 SULLIVAN, LLP 

1300 I Street, NW, Suite 900 

Washington, DC 20005 

Tel: (202) 538-8334 

Email: erikamorabito@quinnemanuel.com

brittanynelson@quinnemanuel.com

Counsel to Lynn L. Tavenner, Esq., Chapter 7 

 Trustee of Estate of LeClairRyan PLLC

SEEN AND AGREED: 

/s/ Andrew M. Bowman 

J. Scott Sexton (VSB No. 29284) 

Andrew W. Bowman (VSB No. 86754) 

GENTRY LOCKE 

P.O. Box 40013 

Roanoke, VA 24022 

Counsel for Gary D. LeClair

Case 20-03142-KRH Doc 130 Filed 01/18/22 Entered 01/18/22 14:11:53 Desc Main

Document Page 2 of 2
### §3172. Definitions

As used in this chapter—

(1) the terms "judge" or "judicial officer" mean, unless otherwise indicated, any United States magistrate judge, Federal district judge, and

(2) the term "offense" means any Federal criminal offense which is in violation of any Act of Congress and is triable by any court established by Act of Congress (other than a Class B or C misdemeanor or an infraction, or an offense triable by court-martial, military commission, provost court, or other military tribunal).

(Added Pub. L. 93–619, title I, §101, Jan. 3, 1975, 88 Stat. 2085; amended Pub. L. 98–473, title II, §223(i), Oct. 12, 1984, 98 Stat. 2029; Pub. L. 101–650, title III, §321, Dec. 1, 1990, 104 Stat. 5117.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

1984—Par. (2). Pub. L. 98–473 substituted "Class B or C misdemeanor or an infraction" for "petty offense as defined in section 1(3) of this title".

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Change of Name

"United States magistrate judge" substituted for "United States magistrate" in par. (1) pursuant to section 321 of Pub. L. 101–650, set out as a note under section 631 of Title 28, Judiciary and Judicial Procedure.

#### Effective Date of 1984 Amendment

Amendment by Pub. L. 98–473 effective Nov. 1, 1987, and applicable only to offenses committed after the taking effect of such amendment, see section 235(a)(1) of Pub. L. 98–473, set out as an Effective Date note under section 3551 of this title.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

DAY HIGH

 1,700

 1,817

 2,225

 2,983

 2,723

 2,728

 2,215

 1,765

 1,205

 1,198

 1,372

 1,584

 1,662

 1,858

 1,781

 1,764

 2,242

 1,928

 1,857

 2,933

 1,586

 1,494

 1,150

 1,157

 1,328

 1,740

 2,506

 2,566

 2,434

 3,076

 638

 644

 622

 636

 727

 680

 653

 615

 586

 564

 583

 581

 589

 566

 582

 580

 572

 590

 559

 564

 611

 559

 541

 540

 549

 572

 609

 576

 619

 692

 893

 913

 977

 1,258

 1,174

 1,145

 1,068

 922

 812

 748

 783

 817

 871

 851

 849

 844

 973

 911

 883

 1,221

 909

 876

 763

 724

 747

 831

 1,048

 1,058

 1,124

 1,369

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

NOVEMBER 2009 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: December 2, 2009

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

14 DAY

ACCUM

MEAN

14 DAY

AVG

MEAN

 12,445

 12,359

 12,376

 12,677

 12,927

 13,181

 13,358

 13,406

 13,335

 13,141

 13,158

 13,188

 13,223

 13,232

 13,188

 13,119

 13,115

 12,768

 12,477

 12,553

 12,394

 12,348

 12,299

 12,275

 12,239

 12,253

 12,430

 12,637

 12,912

 13,437

 889

 883

 884

 906

 923

 942

 954

 958

 953

 939

 940

 942

 945

 945

 942

 937

 937

 912

 891

 897

 885

 882

 879

 877

 874

 875

 888

 903

 922

 960

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

JERSEY POINT TOP ON THE SAN JOAQUIN RIVER
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

March 21, 2018

No. 04-18-00088-CV

IN THE INTEREST OF M.K.M., ET. AL., CHILDREN,

From the 45th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2016PA02764

The Honorable Linda A. Rodriguez, Judge Presiding

O R D E R

Letitia Moncivais’ notification of late record is hereby GRANTED.

_________________________________

Irene Rios, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said 

court on this 21st day of March, 2018.

___________________________________

KEITH E. HOTTLE,

Clerk of Court
Editorial Note on Part 46
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 46 appear by T.D. ATF-457, 66 FR 32220, 32221, June 14, 2001.

§ 46.205 Guidelines to determine title to articles in transit. The dealer may use the following guidelines to establish who holds title to articles in transit. ( a ) If State law mandates the change in title, then no agreement or contract between seller and buyer can alter it.
( b ) In the absence of State law governing the change of title between seller and buyer, the Uniform Commercial Code allows the seller and buyer to agree when title passes.
( c ) If there is no State law or agreement between the seller and buyer, the Uniform Commercial Code states that title transfer depends on how the seller ships the articles. ( 1 ) If the shipment is free on board (F.O.B.) destination, the title transfer occurs when the seller completes the physical delivery of the articles.
( 2 ) If the shipment is free on board (F.O.B.) shipping point, the title transfer occurs at the time and place of shipment, which is generally by common carrier.
(No. 74-CC-321

#### Helix Limited, Claimant, *vs.*State of Illinois, Department of Mental Health, Respondent.

*Opinion filed March 25, 1974.*

Helix Limited, Claimant, pro se.

William J. Scott, Attorney General; Edward L. S. Arkema, Jr., Assistant Attorney General, for Respondent.

Per Curiam.
Exhibit 99.55
 
 News Release
 THERATECHNOLOGIES WELCOMES THE ARRIVAL OF ITS
NEW PRESIDENT AND CEO
 Montréal, Canada  December 1, 2010
    Conference Call and Webcast
 http://www.theratech.com http://www.gowebcasting.com/2139.
 About Theratechnologies
  Theratechnologies Inc.    




---



##### 



EGRIFTA ®
 Forward-Looking Information
  EGRIFTA ® EGRIFTA ® EGRIFTA ® EGRIFTA ®
  Contact:      communications@theratech.com
 
 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

DAY HIGH

 319

 321

 318

 315

 316

 318

 312

 316

 314

 315

 318

 317

 322

 307

 309

 310

 306

 317

 308

 308

 292

 0

 0

 0

 296

 301

 298

 298

 300

 293

 243

 254

 261

 262

 272

 270

 262

 277

 268

 270

 269

 263

 265

 243

 263

 260

 264

 264

 268

 261

 271

 0

 0

 0

 251

 250

 250

 238

 258

 244

 274

 278

 284

 287

 290

 288

 285

 291

 287

 284

 285

 284

 286

 283

 280

 279

 279

 283

 282

 282

 279

 0

 0

 0

 271

 267

 268

 271

 276

 273

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

SEPTEMBER 2006 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: October 3, 2006

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

HOLLAND TRACT ON OLD RIVER
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY ELEV

 124.51

 123.22

 124.57

 124.72

 124.86

 124.36

 124.87

 124.30

 124.42

 123.84

 123.77

 123.82

 124.11

 124.22

 123.95

 124.36

 124.13

 124.31

 124.32

 124.54

 124.10

 124.23

 121.89

 122.46

 123.94

 123.96

 125.03

 124.78

 124.44

 124.68

 124.68

 8,516

 7,894

 8,546

 8,621

 8,691

 8,441

 8,696

 8,411

 8,471

 8,186

 8,153

 8,176

 8,316

 8,371

 8,238

 8,441

 8,326

 8,416

 8,421

 8,531

 8,311

 8,376

 7,295

 7,548

 8,233

 8,242

 8,777

 8,651

 8,481

 8,601

 8,601

STORAGE

+10

-622

+652

+75

+70

-250

+255

-285

+60

-285

-33

+23

+140

+55

-133

+203

-115

+90

+5

+110

-220

+65

-1,081

+253

+685

+9

+535

-126

-170

+120

+0

CHANGE

4,064

3,744

4,386

4,148

4,183

4,022

4,275

4,005

4,187

4,004

4,133

4,155

4,215

4,169

4,079

4,657

4,526

4,402

4,571

4,613

4,450

4,602

4,022

4,699

4,901

4,557

4,818

4,484

4,464

4,612

4,551

INFLOW

 3,943

 3,940

 3,940

 3,991

 4,035

 4,040

 4,037

 4,040

 4,048

 4,039

 4,041

 4,034

 4,035

 4,032

 4,037

 4,450

 4,036

 4,250

 4,450

 4,440

 4,440

 4,446

 4,442

 4,446

 4,441

 4,444

 4,441

 4,441

 4,442

 4,444

 4,443

POWER

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 445

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

SPILL

 60

 60

 60

 60

 60

 60

 60

 60

 60

 60

 60

 60

 60

 60

 60

 60

 60

 60

 60

 60

 60

 60

 60

 60

 60

 60

 60

 60

 60

 60

 60

HATCHERY

 3

 3

 2

 4

 4

 3

 4

 4

 4

 4

 4

 4

 4

 4

 4

 3

 3

 2

 3

 3

 3

 0

 0

 3

 3

 3

 2

 2

 3

 3

 3

C.F.S.

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

JULY 2012 LAKE NATOMA DAILY OPERATIONS RUN DATE: August 1, 2012

IN LAKE

EVAP

C.F.S.

COMPUTED*

ACRE-FEET

RELEASE - C.F.S.

TOTALS +95 134,698 130,728 445 1,860 94

ACRE-FEET +95 267,173 259,299 883 3,689 186

COMMENTS:

* COMPUTED INFLOW IS THE SUM OF CHANGE IN STORAGE, RELEASES AND EVAPORATION.

SUMMARY

RELEASES (ACRE-FEET)

POWER 259,299

SPILL 883

FOLSOM SOUTH CANAL

HATCHERY

 3,023

 3,689

 8,506

FOLSOM

SOUTH 

CANAL

 53

 55

 55

 55

 49

 45

 45

 45

 45

 45

 45

 45

 45

 45

 45

 42

 40

 45

 55

 55

 58

 63

 65

 62

 52

 45

 45

 45

 45

 45

 45

 1,524

 3,023

(1)

(1) INCHES OF EVAPORATION TAKEN FROM FOLSOM PAN.

RELEASES (ACRE-FEET)

TOTAL 266,894
#### In the Matter of the Application of Julia B. Reeve, Appellant, for an Order Adjudging Van Mater Stilwell, an Attorney and Counselor at Law, Respondent, Guilty of Contempt of Court and Punishing Him for Such Contempt in the Action Entitled "Supreme Court, Kings County, Patrick F. Flood, Plaintiff, v. Julia B. Reeve, Defendant."

Order affirmed, without costs, upon the ground that the appellant invited the status that entailed liability and damages. Jenks, P. J., Burr, Thomas, Stapleton and Putnam, JJ., concurred.
EXHIBIT 32.1
                                                                    ------------



             CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SS.1350, AS ADOPTED
              PURSUANT TO SS.906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


     In connection with the quarterly report of Spire Corporation (the
"Company") on Form 10-QSB (the "Report") for the period ended September 30, 2005
as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, I,
Roger G. Little, Chairman of the Board, Chief Executive Officer and President of
the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss.1350, as adopted pursuant to
ss.906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     1.   The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     2.   The information contained in the report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.



Dated:    November 14, 2005                 By:  /s/ Roger G. Little
                                                 -------------------------------
                                                 Roger G. Little
                                                 Chairman of the Board,
                                                 Chief Executive Officer
                                                 and President






     A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or
other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the
signatures that appear in typed form within the electronic version of this
written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to the Company and
will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange
Commission or its staff upon request.
Memorandum

To		 United	States	Department	of	Energy

From		 Benjamin	Longstreth,	Natur al	Resources	Defense	Council

Date		 November	4,	2014

Re		 Ex	Parte	Communication

On	Tuesday,	October	28,	2014,	several	representatives	of	fan	ma nufacturers	and	energy efficiency	advocates	met	with	th e	Department	of	Energy	to	discu ss	potential	standards	for

commercial	and	industrial	fans.

The	fan	manufacturers	and	energy efficiency	advocates	presented information	concerning the	fan	market,	fan	energy‐efficiency	and	the	most	promising	me ans	of	designing	federal efficiency	standards	for	commercia l	and	industrial	fans.	The	at tached	slides	were presented	at	the	meeting.

The	following	individuals	were	present	or	on	the	telephone:

John	Cymbalsky,	DOE Dan	Cohen,	DOE Andrew	deLaski,	ASAP Wade	Smith,	AMCA	International Marc	Bublitz,	New	York	Blower	Company Tom	Catania,	University	of	Michigan Benjamin	Longstreth,	NRDC

Via	telephone: Joanna	Mauer,	ASAP	(via	telephone)
Louis	Starr,	NEEA Meg	Waltner,	NRDC

Respectfully	submitted,

s/	Benjamin	Longstreth

Natural	Resources	Defense	Council
% Gender neutral or male specific values, except for female BTW and fat available
% Set sex=1 to access female parameters


SPECIES=1;
SEX=0;
PREG=0;
GDSTART=1;
PAFC=1;

%BWT and Volume fat specific to women
% Gompertz BWT Parameters (Luecke 2007)
% set Female BWT Parameters
B1=3.4;B2=2.07402;B3=1.504154;B5=34.8806;B6=0.2120837;B7=0.443786;
B4=2.672665;B8=0.31127;
AGE1=2.949004;AGE2=11;AGE3=21.86533;
BWSW=1; %Switch for age (set =0) or set (set =1) determination of BW
BWST=68; %Set value of BW (kg) Np=68, 1ST TRIMESTER=74, 3RD TRIMESTER=77
% set Female VFCb    
VF6=-1.273e-30;VF5=7.249e-25;VF4=-1.558e-19;VF3=1.540e-14;VF2=-6.787e-10;
VF1=1.401e-05;VF0=9.217e-02;


% Constant organ volumes
VBMC=0.021;	% Brown 1997 (red only, yellow is in adipose)
VDC=0.0003;
VPC=0.00148; 	% Young 2009, Brown 1997
VINTC=0.0091;	% Just small intestine (Brown 1997)


% HCT
HCTN=0.40; 	% 0.43 women, 0.47 men (Bresarb 1998); 40 from Abdjljalil et al

% Partitioning Coef. (Lowe 2009)
% CPF
PPLA=83; %PLACENTA =1/3 fat - placenta/fetus could include some bound CPF?
PAFC=19;
% CPF-oxon
PPLAO=11.2; %PLACENTA =2xrapid 
VVOL=0.075;  %ml/hr urine production in women

start @nocallback