alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 10 (Friday, January 14, 2011)]
[Notices]
[Page 2711]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2011-747]



[[Page 2711]]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF LABOR

Employment and Training Administration

[TA-W-74,357]


Cinram Distribution, LLC, a Subsidiary of Cinram International, 
Simi Valley Distribution Center, Including On-Site Leased Workers From 
Labor Ready Southwest, Inc. and Select Remedy Staffing Services, Simi 
Valley, CA; Amended Certification Regarding Eligibility To Apply for 
Worker Adjustment Assistance

    In accordance with Section 223 of the Trade Act of 1974, as amended 
(``Act''), 19 U.S.C. 2273, the Department of Labor issued a 
Certification of Eligibility to Apply for Worker Adjustment Assistance 
on August 24, 2010, applicable to workers of Cinram Distribution, LLC, 
a subsidiary of Cinram International, Simi Valley Distribution Center, 
include on-site leased workers from Labor Ready Southwest, Inc., and 
Select Remedy Staffing Services, Simi Valley, California. The notice 
was published in the Federal Register on September 15, 2010 (75 FR 
51643).
    At the request of a petitioner, the Department reviewed the 
certification for workers of the subject firm. The workers are engaged 
in activities related to the supply of DVD, BluRay, and CD distribution 
services.
    Upon review of the case investigation regarding the subject firm, 
the investigation revealed that an earlier petition was submitted on 
behalf of the workers of Cinram Distribution, LLC, Simi Valley, 
California, dated August 19, 2009. However, that petition was not 
properly instituted.
    In order to include workers in the certified worker group who were 
separated before July 7, 2009, the Department is amending the impact 
date for TA-W-74,357 to August 19, 2008, one year before the petition 
date of August 19, 2009. The investigation revealed that worker 
separations between August 19, 2008 and July 7, 2009 were attributable 
to the increased imports that were the basis for certification.
    The amended notice applicable to TA-W-74,357 is hereby issued as 
follows:

    ``All workers of Cinram Distribution, LLC, a subsidiary of 
Cinram International, including on-site leased workers from Labor 
Ready Southwest, Inc., and Select Remedy Staffing Services, Simi 
Valley, California, who became totally or partially separated from 
employment on or after August 19, 2008, through August 24, 2012, and 
all workers in the group threatened with total or partial separation 
from employment on the date of certification through two years from 
the date of certification, are eligible to apply for adjustment 
assistance under Chapter 2 of Title II of the Trade Act of 1974, as 
amended.''

    Signed in Washington, DC, this 4th day of January 2011.
Michael W. Jaffe,
Certifying Officer, Office of Trade Adjustment Assistance.
[FR Doc. 2011-747 Filed 1-13-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510-FN-P
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY ELEV

 512.29

 512.75

 513.23

 513.71

 514.20

 514.87

 515.43

 515.98

 516.44

 516.87

 517.36

 517.82

 518.37

 519.01

 519.69

 520.62

 521.50

 522.02

 522.54

 523.03

 523.59

 524.16

 524.78

 525.11

 525.49

 525.79

 526.21

 526.70

 527.06

 527.49

 527.79

 253.6

 255.1

 256.7

 258.3

 259.9

 262.1

 263.9

 265.8

 267.3

 268.7

 270.4

 271.9

 273.8

 276.0

 278.3

 281.5

 284.5

 286.3

 288.2

 289.9

 291.8

 293.8

 296.0

 297.2

 298.6

 299.6

 301.2

 302.9

 304.2

 305.8

 306.9

STORAGE

+1.3

+1.5

+1.6

+1.6

+1.6

+2.2

+1.9

+1.8

+1.5

+1.4

+1.6

+1.6

+1.9

+2.2

+2.3

+3.2

+3.0

+1.8

+1.8

+1.7

+2.0

+2.0

+2.2

+1.2

+1.4

+1.1

+1.5

+1.8

+1.3

+1.6

+1.1

CHANGE

788

869

911

909

934

1,231

1,065

1,047

893

846

951

907

1,061

1,221

1,306

1,837

1,830

1,037

1,018

1,123

1,188

1,119

1,315

946

1,034

726

870

1,002

755

1,071

914

INFLOW

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

MADERA

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

SPILL

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 99

 90

 0

 0

 153

 81

 0

 103

 247

 248

 83

 0

 0

 0

 168

 253

FRIANT-KERN

 4

 2

 8

 3

 9

 2

 13

 10

 2

 5

 4

 8

 4

 7

 14

 10

 89

 17

 2

 6

 13

 5

 3

 7

 1

 2

 10

 12

 1

 16

 11

C.F.S.

 .04

 .02

 .08

 .03

 .08

 .02

 .12

 .09

 .02

 .05

 .04

 .07

 .04

 .06

 .13

 .09

 .79

 .15

 .02

 .05

 .11

 .04

 .03

 .06

 .01

 .02

 .09

 .10

 .01

 .14

 .09

INCHES

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .27

 .12

 .11

 .99

 .27

 .00

 .45

 .05

 .00

 .02

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .33

 .04

 .20

 .08

PRECIP

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

DECEMBER 2002 MILLERTON LAKE DAILY OPERATIONS RUN DATE: March 12, 2004

IN LAKE

EVAPORATION

INCHES

C.F.S.

COMPUTED*

1000 ACRE-FEET

RELEASE - C.F.S. 

TOTALS +54.5 32,724 0 1,525 0 300 2.69 2.93

ACRE-FEET +54,543 64,908 0 3,025 0 595

COMMENTS:

* COMPUTED INFLOW IS THE SUM OF CHANGE IN STORAGE, RELEASES, PUMPING AND EVAPORATION.

SUMMARY

RELEASE (ACRE-FEET)

CANALS

FRIANT-KERN

MADERA

 3,025

 0 9,771

PRECIPITATION

THIS MONTH =

JULY 1, 2002 TO DATE = 4.87

 252.3

 6,746 2.93

CANALS

AT FRIANT

TOTAL RELEASES

OUTLET

 115

 115

 115

 115

 115

 116

 116

 116

 116

 116

 116

 117

 117

 117

 118

 118

 118

 111

 100

 101

 101

 101

 101

 101

 101

 101

 101

 101

 101

 102

 102

RIVER

 3,401

 6,746

RIVER
Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan

Marilyn Kelly, Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanag h
Elizabeth A. Weave r

Maura D. Corriga n Robert P. Young, Jr. Stephen J. Markma n Diane M. Hathaway,
J ustices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

_______________________________________ __ Clerk February 26, 2010

d0222 

# Order

February 26, 2010

139306 & (10)

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Plaintiff-Appellee,

v SC: 139306 COA: 291904 Kent CC: 06-011859-FH JUAN ENRIQUE MEJIA, Defendant-Appellant.

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the June 5, 2009 order of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because the defendant has failed to
meet the burden of establishi ng entitlement to relief under MCR 6.508(D). The motion to
remand is DENIED.
###### Editorial Note on Part 20

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 20 appear by T.D. ATF-235, 66 FR 5473, Jan. 19, 2001, and T.D. ATF-463 and T.D. ATF-462, 66 FR 42733, 42736, Aug. 15, 2001.

#### § 20.27 Right of entry and examination.

An appropriate TTB officer may enter, during business hours or at any time operations are being conducted, any premises on which operations governed by this part are conducted to inspect the records and reports required by this part to be kept on those premises. An appropriate TTB officer may also inspect and take samples of distilled spirits, denatured alcohol, specially denatured rum or articles (including any substance for use in the manufacture of denatured alcohol, specially denatured rum or articles) to which those records or reports relate.
11TH COURT OF APPEALS

EASTLAND, TEXAS

JUDGMENT

Robert Pando III, * From the County Court at Law No. 2

 of Ector County, Texas

Trial Court No. 14-4702.

Vs. No. 11-16-00126-CR * August 31, 2016

The State of Texas, * Per Curiam Memorandum Opinion

 (Panel consists of: Wright, C.J.,

 Willson, J., and Bailey, J.)

This court has considered Robert Pando III’s motion to dismiss his appeal 

and concludes that the motion should be granted. Therefore, in accordance with 

this court’s opinion, the appeal is dismissed.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY ELEV

 512.52

 513.27

 513.86

 514.37

 514.80

 515.53

 516.29

 517.60

 519.05

 519.95

 521.10

 521.67

 522.10

 522.78

 523.54

 524.16

 524.67

 525.26

 525.98

 526.59

 527.05

 527.01

 526.89

 526.81

 526.86

 527.36

 528.11

 528.74

 529.71

 530.55

 531.14

 254.4

 256.8

 258.8

 260.4

 261.8

 264.3

 266.8

 271.2

 276.1

 279.2

 283.2

 285.1

 286.6

 289.0

 291.7

 293.8

 295.7

 297.8

 300.3

 302.5

 304.2

 304.0

 303.6

 303.3

 303.5

 305.3

 308.0

 310.3

 313.9

 317.0

 319.1

STORAGE

+1.2

+2.4

+1.9

+1.7

+1.4

+2.4

+2.5

+4.4

+4.9

+3.1

+4.0

+2.0

+1.5

+2.4

+2.7

+2.2

+1.8

+2.1

+2.6

+2.2

+1.7

-0.1

-0.4

-0.3

+0.2

+1.8

+2.7

+2.3

+3.6

+3.1

+2.2

CHANGE

941

1,484

1,086

961

828

1,334

1,394

2,333

2,598

1,682

2,128

1,113

868

1,311

1,460

1,328

1,272

1,275

1,412

1,388

1,201

299

149

227

455

1,279

1,741

1,366

1,912

1,818

1,479

INFLOW

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

MADERA

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

SPILL

 220

 129

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 112

 246

 103

 0

 167

 251

 251

 251

 251

 251

 252

 253

 85

 0

 140

 259

FRIANT-KERN

 5

 14

 3

 5

 3

 3

 6

 3

 6

 16

 19

 4

 2

 1

 3

 1

 2

 1

 3

 2

 2

 8

 3

 8

 1

 2

 4

 9

 4

 5

 8

C.F.S.

 .05

 .13

 .03

 .05

 .03

 .03

 .06

 .03

 .05

 .14

 .17

 .04

 .02

 .01

 .03

 .01

 .02

 .01

 .03

 .02

 .02

 .07

 .03

 .07

 .01

 .02

 .03

 .08

 .03

 .04

 .07

INCHES

 .86

 .36

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .06

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .02

 .00

 .00

 .02

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .02

 .00

 .00

 .13

 .02

 .00

 .00

 .00

PRECIP

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

JANUARY 2004 MILLERTON LAKE DAILY OPERATIONS RUN DATE: March 12, 2004

IN LAKE

EVAPORATION

INCHES

C.F.S.

COMPUTED*

1000 ACRE-FEET

RELEASE - C.F.S. 

TOTALS +66.0 40,122 0 3,221 0 156 1.43 1.49

ACRE-FEET +65,958 79,582 0 6,389 0 309

COMMENTS:

* COMPUTED INFLOW IS THE SUM OF CHANGE IN STORAGE, RELEASES, PUMPING AND EVAPORATION.

SUMMARY

RELEASE (ACRE-FEET)

CANALS

FRIANT-KERN

MADERA

 6,389

 0 13,315

PRECIPITATION

THIS MONTH =

JULY 1, 2003 TO DATE = 5.58

 253.2

 6,926 1.49

CANALS

AT FRIANT

TOTAL RELEASES

OUTLET

 111

 111

 111

 111

 111

 111

 112

 112

 113

 113

 113

 113

 113

 113

 112

 113

 113

 113

 113

 113

 113

 113

 113

 113

 113

 113

 113

 113

 114

 114

 115

RIVER

 3,492

 6,926

RIVER
Editorial Note on Part 447
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 447 appear by T.D. ATF-487, 68 FR 3748, Jan. 24, 2003.

§ 447.43 Terms of permit. ( a ) Import permits issued under this subpart are valid for two years from their issuance date unless a different period of validity is stated thereon. They are not transferable.
( b ) If shipment cannot be completed during the period of validity of the permit, another application must be submitted for permit to cover the unshipped balance. Such an application shall make reference to the previous permit and may include materials in addition to the unshipped balance.
( c ) No amendments or alteration of a permit may be made, except by the appropriate ATF officer.
[T.D. ATF-8, 39 FR 3251, Jan. 25, 1974, as amended by T.D. ATF-325, 57 FR 29787, July 7, 1992; T.D. ATF-426, 65 FR 38197, June 20, 2000; ATF-26F, 79 FR 7396, Feb. 7, 2014]
(No. 74-CC-593

#### Bilingual Education Services, Claimant, *vs.*State of Illinois, Superintendent of Public Instruction, Respondent.

*Opinion filed April 25, 1974.*

*389Bilingual Education Services, Claimant, pro se.

William J. Scott, Attorney General; William E. Webber, Assistant Attorney General, for Respondent.

Per Curiam.
#### §§ 5.157-5.165 [Reserved]
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

DAY HIGH

 170

 171

 172

 166

 166

 176

 187

 198

 211

 224

 253

 296

 446

 539

 615

 719

 724

 727

 644

 538

 435

 476

 511

 738

 929

 1,078

 1,986

 2,086

 2,387

 1,607

 149

 151

 153

 155

 156

 157

 158

 159

 160

 162

 163

 164

 168

 166

 175

 177

 182

 186

 191

 201

 197

 203

 208

 220

 229

 255

 290

 342

 361

 380

 154

 157

 159

 159

 160

 162

 165

 169

 172

 177

 183

 190

 218

 252

 261

 304

 324

 343

 344

 309

 272

 271

 284

 334

 406

 434

 742

 784

 899

 747

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

NOVEMBER 2019 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: December 11, 2019

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

14 DAY

ACCUM

MEAN

14 DAY 

AVG

MEAN

 1,980

 2,000

 2,023

 2,047

 2,072

 2,099

 2,128

 2,160

 2,193

 2,223

 2,262

 2,304

 2,375

 2,477

 2,584

 2,731

 2,896

 3,080

 3,264

 3,411

 3,518

 3,620

 3,732

 3,889

 4,112

 4,356

 4,880

 5,412

 6,050

 6,493

 141

 143

 145

 146

 148

 150

 152

 154

 157

 159

 162

 165

 170

 177

 185

 195

 207

 220

 233

 244

 251

 259

 267

 278

 294

 311

 349

 387

 432

 464

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

JERSEY POINT TOP ON THE SAN JOAQUIN RIVER
Exhibit 32

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ENACTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of National Bancshares
Corporation (the `Corporation`) for the period ending December 31, 2009
as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof
(the `Report`), we, David C. Vernon, President and Chief Executive Officer
of the Corporation, and James R. VanSickle, Senior Vice President and Chief
Financial Officer of the Corporation, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as enacted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that:

(1)	The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a)
or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)  	The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
the Corporation.

This Certification is executed as of March 30, 2010.

/s/ David C. Vernon
David C. Vernon
President and Chief Executive Officer


/s/ James R. VanSickle
James R. VanSickle
Sr. Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
Editorial Note on Part 4
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 4 appear by T.D. ATF-425, 65 FR 11890, Mar. 7, 2000.

§ 4.63 Legibility of mandatory information. ( a ) Statements required under §§ 4.60 through 4.65 of this part to appear in any written, printed, or graphic advertisement shall be in lettering or type size sufficient to be conspicuous and readily legible.
( b ) In the case of signs, billboards, and displays the name and address of the permittee responsible for the advertisement may appear in type size of lettering smaller than the other mandatory information, provided such information can be ascertained upon closer examination of the sign or billboard.
( c ) Mandatory information shall be so stated as to be clearly a part of the advertisement and shall not be separated in any manner from the remainder of the advertisement.
( d ) Mandatory information for two or more products shall not be stated unless clearly separated.
( e ) Mandatory information shall be so stated in both the print and audio-visual media that it will be readily apparent to the persons viewing the advertisement.
[T.D. ATF-180, 49 FR 31672, Aug. 8, 1984]
FILED

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

ELEVENTH CIRCUIT

MARCH 27, 2006

THOMAS K. KAHN

CLERK

[DO NOT PUBLISH]

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT

________________________

No. 05-10004

Non-Argument Calendar

________________________

D. C. Docket No. 99-00208-CR-PAS

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 

Plaintiff-Appellee, 

versus 

ANDRE DUPREE COGDELL, 

Defendant-Appellant. 

________________________

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Florida

_________________________

(March 27, 2006)

Before TJOFLAT, CARNES and PRYOR, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

On May 23, 2000, the district court sentenced appellant to prison terms
2

totaling 420 months for conspiring to traffick cocaine and related offenses. In

addition to sentencing appellant to prison, the court, as part of its final judgment,

forfeited to the Government appellant’s interest in $59,000 the Government had

seized. Appellant appealed his convictions and sentences, and we affirmed. 

United States v. Cogdell, No. 00-13320 (December 27, 2001) (not published). 

On October 15, 2004, appellant filed a motion for return of property, i.e., the

$59,000 forfeited to the Government. The court denied his motion. He now

appeals this ruling.

We affirm. Appellant’s sole means of recourse for obtaining this forfeited 

property was in his direct appeal of his convictions and sentences, not a motion for

the return of property. 

AFFIRMED.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-29-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-29-1996
<CASH>                                           12174
<SECURITIES>                                     58054
<RECEIVABLES>                                   131027
<ALLOWANCES>                                      2037
<INVENTORY>                                      59986
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                272097
<PP&E>                                          387546
<DEPRECIATION>                                  242447
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  457723
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           159136
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                      39155
<COMMON>                                         23229
<OTHER-SE>                                    (251363)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    457723
<SALES>                                         709585
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                709585
<CGS>                                           546151
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   645890
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                (2088)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               48297
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  19899
<INCOME-TAX>                                      8481
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                               7525
<DISCONTINUED>                                   46376
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                  (267)
<CHANGES>                                         1610
<NET-INCOME>                                     55244
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     1.74
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
 
<ARTICLE> 5
<CIK> 0000732026
<NAME> TRIO-TECH INTERNATIONAL
<MULTIPLIER> 1000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-25-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JUN-26-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-25-1998
<CASH>                                           3,299
<SECURITIES>                                     3,321
<RECEIVABLES>                                    3,528
<ALLOWANCES>                                       271
<INVENTORY>                                      1,890
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                12,517
<PP&E>                                          16,199
<DEPRECIATION>                                  10,677
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  18,624
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            6,444
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         8,666
<OTHER-SE>                                         271
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    18,624
<SALES>                                          4,983
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 4,983
<CGS>                                            3,619
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    3,619
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 1,186
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  45
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    133
<INCOME-TAX>                                       104
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                 29
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                        29
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.01
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.01
        

</TABLE>
§ 5.70 Net contents. The requirements of this section apply to the net contents statement required by § 5.63. ( a ) *General.* The volume of spirits in the container must appear on a label as a net contents statement. The word “liter” may be alternatively spelled “litre” or may be abbreviated as “L”. The word “milliliters” may be abbreviated as “ml.,” “mL.,” or “ML.” Net contents in equivalent U.S. customary units of measurement and in metric equivalents such as centiliters may appear on a label and, if used, must appear in the same field of vision as the metric net contents statement.
( b ) *Tolerances.* ( 1 ) The following tolerances are permissible for purposes of applying paragraph (a) of this section: ( i ) *Errors in measuring.* Discrepancies due to errors in measuring that occur in filling conducted in compliance with good commercial practice;
( ii ) *Differences in capacity.* Discrepancies due exclusively to differences in the capacity of containers, resulting solely from unavoidable difficulties in manufacturing the containers so as to be of uniform capacity, provided that the discrepancy does not result from a container design that prevents the manufacture of containers of an approximately uniform capacity; and
( iii ) *Differences in atmospheric conditions.* Discrepancies in measure due to differences in atmospheric conditions in various places, including discrepancies resulting from the ordinary and customary exposure of alcohol beverage products in containers to evaporation, provided that the discrepancy is determined to be reasonable on a case by case basis.
( 2 ) *Shortages and overages.* A contents shortage in certain of the containers in a shipment may not be counted against a contents overage in other containers in the same shipment for purposes of determining compliance with the requirements of this section.