alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 114th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 3711 Engrossed in House (EH)]

<DOC>
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
114th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 3711

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
    To authorize the Secretary of the Interior to conduct a special 
 resource study of Chicano Park, located in San Diego, California, and 
                          for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Chicano Park Preservation Act''.

SEC. 2. SPECIAL RESOURCE STUDY.

    (a) Study.--The Secretary of the Interior shall conduct a special 
resource study of Chicano Park and its murals located in San Diego, 
California.
    (b) Contents.--In conducting the study under subsection (a), the 
Secretary shall--
            (1) evaluate the national significance of the site;
            (2) determine the suitability and feasibility of 
        designating the site as a National Historic Landmark or 
        Affiliated Area of the National Park System;
            (3) consider other alternatives for preservation, 
        protection, and interpretation of Chicano Park and its murals 
        by Federal, State, or local governmental entities, or private 
        and nonprofit organizations;
            (4) consult with interested Federal, State, or local 
        governmental entities, private and nonprofit organizations or 
        any other interested individuals; and
            (5) identify cost estimates for any development, 
        interpretation, operation, and maintenance associated with the 
        alternatives.
    (c) Applicable Law.--The study required under subsection (a) shall 
be conducted in accordance with section 100507 of title 54, United 
States Code, except that the study shall not consider any options that 
involve Federal acquisition of lands, interests in lands, or any other 
property related to the Chicano Park and its murals.
    (d) Report.--Not later than 18 months after the date on which funds 
are first made available for the study under subsection (a), the 
Secretary shall submit to the Committee on Natural Resources of the 
House of Representatives and the Committee on Energy and Natural 
Resources of the Senate a report containing the results of the study 
and any conclusions and recommendations of the Secretary.

            Passed the House of Representatives December 7, 2016.

            Attest:

                                                                 Clerk.
114th CONGRESS

  2d Session

                               H. R. 3711

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

    To authorize the Secretary of the Interior to conduct a special 
 resource study of Chicano Park, located in San Diego, California, and 
                          for other purposes.
```
### §1154. Contract authority

The authorization to enter into contracts or other obligations under the Act, as amended by this Act, shall be effective for fiscal year 1981 and any succeeding fiscal year only to the extent or in such amounts as are provided in advance in appropriation Acts.

(Pub. L. 96–374, title XIII, §1392, Oct. 3, 1980, 94 Stat. 1504.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

The Act, as amended by this Act, referred to in text, means the Higher Education Act of 1965, Pub. L. 89–329, Nov. 8, 1965, 79 Stat. 1219, as amended by the Education Amendments of 1980, Pub. L. 96–374, Oct. 3, 1980, 94 Stat. 1367, which is classified generally to this chapter. For complete classification of this Act to the Code, see Short Title note set out under section 1001 of this title and Tables.

#### Codification

Section was formerly classified to section 1146 of this title.

Section was enacted as part of the Education Amendments of 1980, and not as part of the Higher Education Act of 1965 which comprises this chapter.

Section was enacted as part of the Higher Education Amendments of 1986, and not as part of the Higher Education Act of 1965 which comprises this chapter.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date

Section effective Oct. 1, 1980, see section 1393(a) of Pub. L. 96–374, set out as an Effective Date of 1980 Amendment note under section 1001 of this title.

#### Contracting Authority Subject To Appropriations

Pub. L. 99–498, §3, Oct. 17, 1986, 100 Stat. 1278, provided that: "The authority to enter into contracts or other obligations under this Act (other than amendments made to part B of title IV of the Act) [see Tables for classification] shall be effective for any fiscal year only to such extent or in such amounts as are provided in appropriation Acts."
I 

116TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 5431 

To amend title 49, United States Code, to provide family and medical leave 

to employees of the Federal Aviation Administration, and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

DECEMBER 13, 2019 

Mr. HASTINGS (for himself, Mr. SMITH of Washington, Mr. MCGOVERN, and 

Mr. COLE) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure 

A BILL 

To amend title 49, United States Code, to provide family 

and medical leave to employees of the Federal Aviation 

Administration, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘FAA Family and Med5 ical Leave Act’’. 

6 SEC. 2. FAMILY AND MEDICAL LEAVE FOR FAA EMPLOY7 EES. 

8 Section 40122(g)(2) of title 49, United States Code, 

9 is amended— 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
2 

•HR 5431 IH

1 (1) in subparagraph (I)(iii), by striking ‘‘and’’ 

2 at the end; 

3 (2) in subparagraph (J), by striking the period 

4 at the end and inserting ‘‘; and’’; and 

5 (3) by adding at the end the following: 

6 ‘‘(K) subchapter V of chapter 63, relating 

7 to family and medical leave.’’. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
---

---

Exhibit 11.1

AMPAL-AMERICAN ISRAEL
CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

SCHEDULE SETTING FORTH
COMPUTATION OF LOSS PER SHARE OF CLASS A STOCK

|SIX MONTHS ENDED JUNE 30,      | 2005 | 2004
|------------------------------ | ---- | ----
|
|
|
|
|BASIC EPS                      |      |     
|Net Gain (loss)(1)             |      |     
|                               |      |     
|Gain (Loss) per Class A Share  |      |     
|                               |      |     
|Shares used in calculation (2) |      |     
|                               |      |     
|DILUTED EPS                    |      |     
|Net Gain (loss)                |      |     
|                               |      |     
|Gain (loss) per Class A Share  |      |     
|                               |      |     
|Shares used in calculation (2) |      |     

| | (1) | After
deduction of accrued preferred stock dividends of $100 and $107           respectively.
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

| | (2) | In
2004, the conversion of the 4% and 6-1/2% Preferred Stock and the exercise           of
stock options were excluded from the diluted EPS calculation due to the
          antidilutive effect.
| | --- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



---

---
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY HIGH

 399

 383

 365

 367

 348

 353

 364

 354

 357

 345

 354

 342

 339

 336

 333

 338

 338

 344

 333

 337

 331

 336

 336

 339

 341

 342

 340

 346

 343

 340

 348

 331

 307

 270

 305

 289

 301

 319

 326

 323

 308

 317

 300

 300

 281

 302

 289

 282

 255

 304

 297

 287

 291

 300

 298

 295

 292

 301

 311

 316

 278

 313

 368

 356

 332

 335

 332

 328

 339

 339

 337

 333

 334

 329

 325

 320

 321

 322

 312

 313

 322

 322

 321

 320

 326

 324

 326

 328

 325

 329

 328

 321

 334

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

MARCH 2008 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: April 8, 2008

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

FARRAR PARK AT DUTCH SLOUGH
(April 19, 1948.)

#### Mark J. Gayn, Respondent, v. News Syndicate Co., Inc., et al., Appellants, et al., Defendants.

Order, so far as appealed from, striking out the complete defense unanimously reversed, with $20 costs and disbursements to *959the appellants, and the motion in all respects denied *(Gayn*v. *New York World-Telegram Gorp.,*272 App. Div. 812). Present — Peck, P. J., Glennon, Dore, Yan Yoorhis and Shientag, JJ.
I 

114TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 3743 

To prohibit the Secretary of an executive department from maintaining a 

private email server for conducting official Government business. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

OCTOBER 9, 2015 

Mr. CRAMER introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Oversight and Government Reform 

A BILL 

To prohibit the Secretary of an executive department from 

maintaining a private email server for conducting official 

Government business. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Securing Every Rel5 evant and Vital Electronic Record Act of 2015’’ or the 

6 ‘‘SERVER Act’’. 


SSpencer on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 3743 IH

1 SEC. 2. PROHIBITION ON SECRETARY OF EXECUTIVE DE2 PARTMENT FROM MAINTAINING PRIVATE 

3 EMAIL SERVER. 

4 (a) PROHIBITION.—The Secretary of an executive de5 partment may not maintain a private email server for the 

6 purpose of conducting official Government business. 

7 (b) COMPLIANCE.—The Inspector General of each ex8 ecutive department shall ensure compliance with sub9 section (a). 

10 (c) CRIMINAL PENALTY.—Whoever violates sub11 section (a) shall be fined under title 18, United States 

12 Code, or imprisoned not more than three years, or both; 

13 and shall forfeit his or her office and be disqualified from 

14 holding any office under the United States. 

15 (d) DEFINITIONS.—In this section: 

16 (1) EXECUTIVE DEPARTMENT.—The term ‘‘ex17 ecutive department’’ has the meaning provided in 

18 section 101 of title 5, United States Code. 

19 (2) PRIVATE EMAIL SERVER AND OFFICIAL

20 GOVERNMENT BUSINESS.—The terms ‘‘private email 

21 server’’ and ‘‘official Government business’’ have the 

22 meanings provided in regulations promulgated for 

23 purposes of this Act by the Archivist of the United 

24 States. 

Æ 


SSpencer on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
-       - Superintendent of Documents
      - 2023-07-14T05:10:55-0400
      - Government Publishing Office, Washington, DC 20401
      - Government Publishing Office
      - Government Publishing Office attests that this document has not been altered since it was disseminated by Government Publishing Office
```

[Congressional Bills 116th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 5651 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

116th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 5651

To amend title V of the Social Security Act to require assurances that 
  certain family planning service projects and programs will provide 
   pamphlets containing the contact information of adoption centers.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            January 16, 2020

 Mr. Wittman introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                    Committee on Energy and Commerce

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To amend title V of the Social Security Act to require assurances that 
  certain family planning service projects and programs will provide 
   pamphlets containing the contact information of adoption centers.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Adoption Information Act''.

SEC. 2. PROVISION IN FAMILY PLANNING SERVICES OF PAMPHLETS CONTAINING 
              ADOPTION CENTER CONTACT INFORMATION.

    Title V of the Social Security Act (42 U.S.C. 701 et seq.) is 
amended by adding at the end the following:

``SEC. 514. LIMITATION.

    ``(a) In General.--Notwithstanding any other provision of this 
title, a grant may be made or contract entered into under section 501 
for a family planning service project or program only upon assurances 
satisfactory to the Secretary that the project or program will--
            ``(1) provide to each person to whom the medical 
        professional provides family planning medical services, at the 
        time the person inquires about medical or abortion services, a 
        pamphlet that contains--
                    ``(A) a comprehensive list of the adoption centers 
                located in the region (as determined by the Secretary) 
                where the adoption services are provided; and
                    ``(B) the address and telephone number of each such 
                center; and
            ``(2) provide each such person an opportunity to read the 
        pamphlet.
    ``(b) Pamphlets.--The Secretary shall prepare, annually update, and 
distribute to each project or program referred to in subsection (a) 
pamphlets described in such subsection.
    ``(c) No Additional Funds.--No funds may be used to carry out this 
section, except funds that are appropriated to carry out this title.''.
                                 <all>
```
490 P.2d 470

#### STATE of New Mexico, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Robert Dan PEDRO, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 660.

Court of Appeals of New Mexico.

Oct. 15, 1971.

Scott McCarty, Albuquerque, David H. Getches, Richard B. Collins, Jr., Native American Rights Fund, Boulder, Colo., for defendant-appellant.

David L. Norvell, Atty. Gen., Leila Andrews, Asst. Atty, Gen., Santa Fe, for plaintiff-appellee.

OPINION

WOOD, Chief Judge.

Convicted of violating § 54-5-16, N.M. S.A.1953 (Repl.Vol. 8, pt. 2), defendant appeals. The portion of § 54-5-16, supra, involved in this appeal makes it unlawful “ * * * to possess, * * * anhalonium, commonly known as peyote or pellote; * * * ” We need consider only one of the issues raised by defendant; that issue, which is dispositive, is whether the statute requires that possession of anhalonium be intentional.

Section 54-5-16, supra, does not state that the possession must have been intentional. In this situation, judicial construction of the statute is required. State v. Shedoudy, 45 N.M. 516, 118 P.2d 280 (1941). “Intent” is required unless it clearly appears that the Legislature meant to eliminate “intent” as part of the offense. State v. Austin, 80 N.M. 748, 461 P.2d 230 (Ct.App.1969); State v. Davis, 80 N.M. 347, 455 P.2d 851 (Ct.App.1969). It does not clearly appear from thé statuté that the Legislature intended to make unintentional possession of anhalonium a crime. Accordingly, an intent to possess the anhalonium is required. The same result has been reached in other cases where the statute which prohibited possession did not refer to “intent.” As to narcotic drugs, see State v. Giddings, 67 N.M. 87, 352 P.2d 1003 (1960), State v. Mosier and Mordecai, (Ct.App.), 83 N.M. 208, 213, 490 P.2d 466, 471, State v. Maes, 81 N.M. 550, 469 P.2d 529 (Ct.App.1970); as to mercury, see State v. Davis, supra; as to burglary tools, compare State v. Lawson, 59 N.M. 482, 286 P. 2d 1076 (1955).

In this case, the trial court ruled that “intent” was not an element of the offense of possession of anhalonium. Being of this view, which was erroneous; the trial court did not determine whether there was an intentional possession. We do not remand the case for such a determination because there is no evidence of intentional possession. Neither evidence nor inference in the State’s case shows defendant inten*213tionally possessed anhalonium. The defense evidence is to the effect that defendant, an Arapahoe Indian, was treated for an illness by White Oak, an Arapahoe “Indian Doctorthat after the treatment, defendant was given “medicine” to carry on his person as a “protection;” that defendant did not know the composition of this medicine. This medicine is the substance on which the prosecution is based.

There being no evidence of intentional possession, the conviction is reversed. The cause is remanded with instructions to set aside the judgment and sentence and to .dismiss the charge against defendant.

It is so ordered.

HENDLEY and COWAN, JJ., concur.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY ELEV

 1,131.68

 1,131.68

 1,131.68

 1,131.68

 1,131.68

 1,131.68

 1,131.68

 1,131.68

 1,131.68

 1,131.68

 1,131.68

 1,131.68

 1,131.68

 1,131.68

 1,131.68

 1,131.68

 1,131.68

 1,131.68

 1,131.68

 1,131.68

 1,131.68

 1,131.68

 1,131.68

 1,131.68

 1,131.68

 1,131.68

 1,131.68

 1,131.68

 1,131.68

 1,131.68

 1,131.68

 .28

 .28

 .28

 .28

 .28

 .28

 .28

 .28

 .28

 .28

 .28

 .28

 .28

 .28

 .28

 .28

 .28

 .28

 .28

 .28

 .28

 .28

 .28

 .28

 .28

 .28

 .28

 .28

 .28

 .28

 .28

STORAGE

+0.00

+0.00

+0.00

+0.00

+0.00

+0.00

+0.00

+0.00

+0.00

+0.00

+0.00

+0.00

+0.00

+0.00

+0.00

+0.00

+0.00

+0.00

+0.00

+0.00

+0.00

+0.00

+0.00

+0.00

+0.00

+0.00

+0.00

+0.00

+0.00

+0.00

+0.00

CHANGE

2

2

2

2

2

2

2

2

2

2

2

2

2

2

2

2

2

2

2

2

2

2

2

2

2

2

2

2

2

2

2

INFLOW

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

SPILL

 2

 2

 2

 2

 2

 2

 2

 2

 2

 2

 2

 2

 2

 2

 2

 2

 2

 2

 2

 2

 2

 2

 2

 2

 2

 2

 2

 2

 2

 2

 2

OUTLET

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

C.F.S.

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

INCHES

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .01

 .00

 .00

 .02

 .19

 .09

 .00

 .94

 .49

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

PRECIP

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-ORLAND PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

OCTOBER 2021 EAST PARK RESERVOIR DAILY OPERATIONS RUN DATE: 11/18/2021

IN LAKE

EVAPORATION

INCHES

C.F.S.

COMPUTED*

1000 ACRE-FEET

RELEASE - C.F.S.

TOTALS +.00 62 62 0 0 .00 1.74

ACRE-FEET +0 123 123 0 0

COMMENTS:

* COMPUTED INFLOW IS THE SUM OF CHANGE IN STORAGE, RELEASES AND EVAPORATION.

DATA BASED ON 24 HOUR PERIOD ENDING 0800 AM.

SUMMARY RELEASE (ACRE-FEET)

SPILL 0

OUTLET

TOTAL

 123

 123

PRECIPITATION

THIS MONTH =

TO DATE =

 1.74

JULY 1, 2021 2.12

 .28

OCT 1, 2021 TO DATE = 1.74
#### In the Matter of United Aero Club, Incorporated, Appellant, against Dennis F. McCarthy, as Building Inspector of the Town of Mount Pleasant, Respondent.

Motion for reargument denied, with $10 costs. Motion for leave to appeal to the Court of Appeals denied. Present — Lewis, P. J., Carswell, Johnston, Adel and Wenzel, JJ. [See 272 App. Div. 1017.]
###### Editorial Note on Part 46

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 46 appear by T.D. ATF-457, 66 FR 32220, 32221, June 14, 2001.

#### § 46.253 Destruction of articles by a Presidentially-declared major disaster.

After the dealer has paid the floor stocks tax, the dealer may file a claim for refund of tax on articles lost, rendered unmarketable, or condemned because of a Presidentially-declared major disaster. Subpart C of this part prescribes the time, evidence, and procedures for filing such a claim.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

DAY HIGH

 0

 0

 0

 6,126

 6,684

 6,564

 7,174

 7,859

 6,888

 4,078

 2,111

 1,232

 952

 677

 752

 594

 477

 461

 851

 550

 696

 1,179

 1,589

 1,621

 1,871

 2,207

 2,254

 3,090

 0

 0

 0

 1,797

 1,195

 1,570

 1,321

 601

 496

 445

 377

 363

 313

 266

 313

 307

 301

 301

 303

 306

 315

 325

 348

 384

 432

 439

 462

 513

 0

 0

 0

 3,952

 3,726

 3,532

 3,919

 4,325

 3,540

 1,902

 728

 493

 390

 349

 386

 358

 342

 343

 364

 339

 372

 442

 548

 591

 697

 804

 965

 1,093

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

FEBRUARY 2014 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: June 6, 2014

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

14 DAY

ACCUM

MEAN

14 DAY

AVG

MEAN

 73,193

 68,466

 63,686

 63,276

 62,534

 60,955

 59,456

 58,110

 55,163

 50,001

 44,314

 38,178

 32,257

 26,856

 27,242

 27,600

 27,942

 24,333

 20,971

 17,778

 14,231

 10,348

 7,356

 6,045

 6,014

 6,325

 6,900

 7,644

 5,228

 4,890

 4,549

 4,520

 4,467

 4,354

 4,247

 4,151

 3,940

 3,572

 3,165

 2,727

 2,304

 1,918

 1,946

 1,971

 1,996

 1,738

 1,498

 1,270

 1,017

 739

 525

 432

 430

 452

 493

 546

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

EMMATON BOTTOM ON THE SACRAMENTO RIVER