alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### Juan VILLAGOMEZ, Petitioner, v. Alberto R. GONZALES, Attorney General, Respondent.

No. 04-70974.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted Feb. 10, 2006.*

Decided Feb. 21, 2006.**

Glen A. Prior, Esq., Pacific Law Inc., Fife, WA, for Petitioner.

Ronald E. LeFevre, Chief Counsel, Office of the District Counsel Department of Homeland Security, San Francisco, CA, David E. Dauenheimer, Esq., Immigration and Naturalization Service Office of the District Counsel, Seattle, WA, Jennifer Levings, Esq., DOJ-U.S. Department of Justice Civil Div./Offiee of Immigration Lit., Washington, DC, for Respondent.

Before: LEAVY, RYMER and FISHER, Circuit Judges.

*

 This panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

**

 Withdrawn and amended and superseded on grant of rehearing. See 2006 WL 1147441.

MEMORANDUM ***

Juan Villagomez, a native and citizen of Mexico, petitions for review of the Board of Immigration Appeal’s (“BIA”) decision denying his motion to reopen removal proceedings and reconsider its previous decision denying his application for a waiver of inadmissability under former section 212(c) of the Immigration and Nationality Act (“INA”), 8 U.S.C. § 1182(c). We review for abuse of discretion the BIA’s denial of a motion to reopen and reconsider, *Cano-Merida v. INS,*311 F.3d 960, 964 (9th Cir.2002), and we dismiss the petition for review. Because the parties are familiar with the facts, we do not recite them in detail.

Villagomez has not argued that the BIA abused its discretion in denying his motion to reopen and reconsider, nor has he challenged the BIA’s determination that he was not deserving of cancellation of removal. Villagomez has thus waived any consideration of those issues. *See Martinez-Serrano v. INS,*94 F.3d 1256, 1260 (9th Cir.1996). Villagomez instead challenges the BIA’s initial dismissal of his appeal. However, we lack jurisdiction to consider his contentions as he failed to petition for review within 30 days of that decision. *See*8 U.S.C. § 1252(b)(1).

Villagomez first argues that he was not removable because his convictions do not qualify as crimes of violence or domestic violence. However, he failed to appeal the immigration judge’s (“IJ”) determination of removability to the BIA and we lack jurisdiction. *See*8 U.S.C. § 1252(d)(1); *Barron v. Ashcroft,*358 F.3d 674, 677-78 (9th Cir.2004) (holding that the court lacks subject-matter jurisdiction over legal claims not presented in administrative proceedings below). Villagomez’s second argument is that the BIA erred when it declined to remand his case to the IJ; however, the BIA did so in its October 8, 2003 order, not in the denial of the motion to reconsider that is the subject of the *203present petition for review. We lack jurisdiction as to this issue as well.

Petition for review DISMISSED.

***

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
Appendix B 

Site-specific Maps for Aboveground Facilities
1.06 NM

 Proposed Auke Bay Route

= Minimum Autorotation Glide Distance AS-350 at 2,000 AGL 

=Proposed Landing Site
Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.,
Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanag h Marilyn Kell y Stephen J. Markma n Diane M. Hathawa y Mary Beth Kell y Brian K. Zahra,
J ustices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

_______________________________________ __ Clerk July 25, 2011

y0718 

# Order

July 25, 2011

141822

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Plaintiff-Appellee,

v SC: 141822 COA: 292288 Saginaw CC: 09-032100-FH REGINAL LAVAL SHORT, a/k/a REGINALD LAVAL SHORT, Defendant-Appellant.

________________ _______________ __________/

By order of October 29, 2010, we grante d leave to appeal the August 26, 2010 judgment of the Court of Appeals. By orde r of April 5, 2011, this case was held in abeyance pending the decision in Davis v United States , cert gtd, ___ US ___; 131 S Ct 502; 178 L Ed 2d 368 (2010). On order of the Court, the case having been decided on June 16, 2011, Davis v United States , ___ US ___; 131 S Ct 2419; ___ L Ed 2d ___ (2011), we VACATE that part of our October 29, 2010 order that granted leave to appeal. The application is again considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the question presented should be reviewed by this Court.
Editorial Note on Part 46
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 46 appear by T.D. ATF-457, 66 FR 32220, 32221, June 14, 2001.

§ 46.126 Change in name or address. ( a ) *Change in name.* If there is a change in the corporate or firm name, or in the trade name, as shown on TTB Form 5630.5t, the taxpayer must file an amended special tax return as soon as practicable after the change, covering the new corporate or firm name, or trade name. No new special tax is required to be paid. The taxpayer must attach the special tax stamp for endorsement of the change in name.
( b ) *Change in location* — ( 1 ) *General.* If there is a change in location of a taxable place of business, the taxpayer must, within 30 days after the change, file with TTB an amended special tax return covering the new location. The taxpayer must attach the special tax stamp or stamps for endorsement of the change in location. No new special tax is required to be paid. However, if the taxpayer does not file the amended return within 30 days, the taxpayer is required to pay a new special tax and obtain a new special tax stamp.
( 2 ) *Procedure.* If the taxpayer's original return on TTB Form 5630.5t covered only one location, the taxpayer may deliver the amended return and the stamp at any TTB office, or to any TTB officer inspecting the business, in lieu of mailing them to TTB. If the taxpayer's original return covered multiple locations under the provisions of § 46.101(b), he or she must forward with the amended return an attachment showing both the old and new address of any place of business which has been relocated, and the special tax stamp covering the location from which the business was removed. The appropriate TTB officer receiving such return or stamp will, if the return is submitted within the 30-day period, enter the proper endorsement on the stamp and return it to the taxpayer.
(26 U.S.C. 5733, 7011)
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY ELEV

 360.03

 360.03

 360.03

 360.03

 360.03

 360.03

 360.03

 360.03

 360.05

 360.03

 360.03

 360.03

 360.03

 360.03

 360.03

 360.03

 360.03

 360.03

 360.16

 360.59

 360.52

 360.52

 360.49

 360.49

 360.04

 360.49

 360.49

 360.49

 360.24

 360.11

 360.03

 539

 539

 539

 539

 539

 539

 539

 539

 541

 539

 539

 539

 539

 539

 539

 539

 539

 539

 548

 578

 573

 573

 571

 571

 540

 571

 571

 571

 554

 545

 539

STORAGE

+0

+0

+0

+0

+0

+0

+0

+0

+2

-2

+0

+0

+0

+0

+0

+0

+0

+0

+9

+30

-5

+0

-2

+0

-31

+31

+0

+0

-17

-9

-6

CHANGE

 293

 295

 295

 284

 273

 273

 272

 273

 272

 273

 289

 299

 304

 303

 10

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 219

 226

 226

 224

 223

 226

 227

 220

 223

 221

 222

 222

 223

 225

 222

 220

 225

 224

 241

 888

 948

 952

 950

 949

 949

 949

 949

 950

 870

 509

 252

SPILL

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

OUTLET

OAKDALE IRRIGATION DISTRICT

SOUTH SAN JOAQUIN IRRIGATION DISTRICT

TRI DAMS PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

OCTOBER 2003 GOODWIN RESERVOIR DAILY OPERATIONS RUN DATE: September 14, 2004

RES.

ACRE-FEET

RELEASE - C.F.S. 

TOTALS +0 0 14,374 4,008

ACRE-FEET +0 0 28,511 7,950

SUMMARY

RELEASE (ACRE-FEET)

JOINT MAIN CANAL 6,155

SOUTH MAIN CANAL 7,950

 42,616

 539

OUTLET 0

TOTAL 

TULLOCH

RELEASE

 834

 832

 818

 785

 754

 752

 751

 743

 749

 747

 778

 786

 771

 649

 263

 247

 245

 237

 352

 866

 918

 921

 919

 937

 954

 949

 955

 975

 891

 538

 324

 22,240

 44,113

JOINT MAIN OPERATED BY SSJID AND OID.

SOUTH MAIN OPERATED BY OID.

JOINT

MAIN

SOUTH

MAIN

SPILL 28,511

 264

 262

 250

 232

 210

 211

 211

 211

 211

 214

 222

 221

 203

 96

 7

 7

 6

 5

 5

 5

 5

 5

 5

 5

 5

 3

 0

 4

 6

 6

 6

 3,103

 6,155

RIVER CANALS
#### § 24.240 General.

Wine will be stored on bonded wine premises in buildings or tanks constructed and secured in accordance with the provisions of §§ 24.166 and 24.167. Wine will be stored in tanks, casks, barrels, cased or uncased bottles, or in any other suitable container, which will not contaminate the wine. Specifically authorized materials and processes for the treatment and finishing of wine are listed in §§ 24.246 and 24.248 of this subpart.

(Sec. 201, Pub. L. 85-859, 72 Stat. 1378, as amended, 1379, as amended, 1383, as amended, 1395, as amended (26 U.S.C. 5352, 5357, 5382, 5552))

[T.D. ATF-299, 55 FR 24989, June 19, 1990, as amended by T.D. ATF-312, 56 FR 31079, July 9, 1991]
EXHIBIT 32

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of PhotoWorks, Inc. (the "Company") on Form
10-K for the period ending September 25, 2004, as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Philippe Sanchez,
Chief Executive Officer of the Company, and Loran Cashmore Bond, Chief
Accounting Officer certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant
to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, as of the date hereof, to
the best of our knowledge and belief:

      (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
Company for the stated periods.


Signature: /s/ Philippe Sanchez            Signature: /s/ Loran Cashmore Bond
           ------------------------                   ------------------------
           Philippe Sanchez                           Loran Cashmore Bond
           Chief Executive Officer                    Chief Accounting Officer

Dated: December 23, 2004                   Dated: December 23, 2004


                                       54
#### § 24.114 Registry of stills.

Any still intended for use in the production of volatile fruit-flavor concentrate will be set up on bonded wine premises. Each still is subject to the provisions of subpart C of part 29 of this chapter and will be registered. The listing of a still in the application, and the approval of the application, will, as provided in 27 CFR 29.55, constitute registration.

(Sec. 201, Pub. L. 85-859, 72 Stat. 1355, as amended, 1379, as amended, 1392, as amended (26 U.S.C. 5179, 5356, 5511))

(Approved by the Office of Management and Budget under control number 1512-0058)

[T.D. ATF-299, 55 FR 24989, June 19, 1990, as amended by T.D. ATF-409, 64 FR 13685, Mar. 22, 1999; T.D. ATF-462, 66 FR 42737, Aug. 15, 2001]
### §1070g–4. Program report

Not later than two years after August 14, 2008, and every two years thereafter, the Secretary shall prepare and submit to the authorizing committees a report on TEACH grants with respect to the schools and students served by recipients of such grants. Such report shall take into consideration information related to—

(1) the number of TEACH grant recipients;

(2) the degrees obtained by such recipients;

(3) the location, including the school, local educational agency, and State, where the recipients completed the service agreed to under section 1070g–2(b) of this title and the subject taught;

(4) the duration of such service; and

(5) any other data necessary to conduct such evaluation.

(Pub. L. 89–329, title IV, §420P, as added Pub. L. 110–315, title IV, §412(a)(2), Aug. 14, 2008, 122 Stat. 3227.)
### §756. Internee of belligerent nation

Whoever, within the jurisdiction of the United States, aids or entices any person belonging to the armed forces of a belligerent nation or faction who is interned in the United States in accordance with the law of nations, to escape or attempt to escape from the jurisdiction of the United States or from the limits of internment prescribed, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than five years, or both.

(June 25, 1948, ch. 645, 62 Stat. 735; Pub. L. 103–322, title XXXIII, §330016(1)(H), Sept. 13, 1994, 108 Stat. 2147; Pub. L. 104–132, title VII, §705(a)(3), Apr. 24, 1996, 110 Stat. 1295.)

#### Historical and Revision Notes

Based on title 18, U.S.C., 1940 ed., §37 (June 15, 1917, ch. 30, title V, §7, 40 Stat. 223).

Section was divided. Remaining provisions relating to arrest appear in section 3058 of this title.

Minor changes in phraseology were made.

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

1996—Pub. L. 104–132 substituted "five years" for "one year".

1994—Pub. L. 103–322 substituted "fined under this title" for "fined not more than $1,000".
#### Arvilla King, Respondent, v. Syracuse, Lake Shore and Northern Railroad Company, Appellant.

Judgment of Oswego County Court and judgment and order of City Court of Fulton reversed, and the complaint dismissed, with costs in all courts to the appeUant. Held, that the proof shows that the overcharge was made through inadvertence and mistake not amounting to gross negligence,* and defendant’s motion for a nonsuit should have been granted. AH concurred.

*

See Railroad Law (Consol. Laws, chap. 49; Laws of 1910, chap. 481), § 59.— [Rep,
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY HIGH

 451

 504

 511

 604

 750

 710

 734

 577

 586

 550

 538

 551

 579

 646

 649

 682

 720

 730

 724

 751

 700

 573

 581

 520

 558

 533

 511

 517

 530

 515

 589

 230

 223

 229

 227

 234

 239

 239

 244

 270

 279

 291

 292

 305

 299

 298

 287

 288

 295

 288

 297

 300

 316

 307

 326

 326

 333

 323

 323

 308

 306

 301

 290

 300

 323

 387

 418

 400

 387

 355

 357

 369

 383

 391

 393

 396

 395

 410

 416

 436

 456

 459

 436

 406

 398

 397

 405

 399

 386

 381

 374

 373

 389

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

AUGUST 2006 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: September 11, 2006

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

14 DAY

ACCUM

MEAN

14 DAY 

AVG

MEAN

 3,945

 4,055

 4,168

 4,326

 4,499

 4,635

 4,737

 4,777

 4,810

 4,847

 4,895

 4,959

 5,049

 5,149

 5,254

 5,364

 5,457

 5,506

 5,544

 5,603

 5,652

 5,703

 5,744

 5,772

 5,794

 5,802

 5,795

 5,780

 5,759

 5,722

 5,695

 282

 290

 298

 309

 321

 331

 338

 341

 344

 346

 350

 354

 361

 368

 375

 383

 390

 393

 396

 400

 404

 407

 410

 412

 414

 414

 414

 413

 411

 409

 407

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

JERSEY POINT TOP ON THE SAN JOAQUIN RIVER
### §1131d. Report

The Institute shall prepare a report once every two years on the activities of the Institute and shall submit such report to the Secretary of Education and the Secretary of State.

(Pub. L. 89–329, title VI, §627, formerly §625, as added Pub. L. 102–325, title VI, §601, July 23, 1992, 106 Stat. 735; renumbered §626, Pub. L. 105–244, title VI, §603(b)(1), Oct. 7, 1998, 112 Stat. 1783; renumbered §627 and amended Pub. L. 110–315, title VI, §§617(1), 618, Aug. 14, 2008, 122 Stat. 3341, 3342.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Prior Provisions

A prior section 627 of Pub. L. 89–329 was renumbered section 628, and is classified to section 1131e of this title.

Another prior section 627 of Pub. L. 89–329 was renumbered section 629, and is classified to section 1131f of this title.

#### Amendments

2008—Pub. L. 110–315, §618, substituted "prepare a report once every two years" for "annually prepare a report".
## Johnson , Shelit a (OST) \Do^kA 4 T)0T'0^T'2t)H > 603C o

From : Kristi n Leak e tl<leal<e@ggh-airlaw.com ] Sent : Wednesday , Augus t10 , 201 1 9:5 6 A M To : Johnson , Shelit a (OST ) Subject : RE : Docke tDOT-OST-201 1 -003 6
Dea rShelita : Pe rinstruction s fro m Pierre , I herebyconfir m tha tAerobel l agree s t o th e inclusio n o flanguag e regardin g al l th e right s an d privilege s unde rth e US-Costa Ric a bilatera l agreement
. Pleas e le tm e kno wi fyo u requir e anythin g further

. Regards , ii^ ' 

### Kristi nK
. Leakei s C N— S L A WOFFICE S O F PIERR E MURPH Y 120 0 NE WHAMPSHIR E AVENUE , N W SUIT E 80 0 WASHINGTON , 

### D C 2003 6 TELEPHONE : 

### (202 ) 776-398 0 FACSIMILE : 

### (202 ) 776-397 5 EMAIL : KKLEAKE@LOPMURPHY.CO M _ TM C D > O c n r-^^-oril i n^Os?
- ;T-i-^(-r i 

## oo o ~:-:^ ^ C o

From : Shelita.SmithcSdot.ao vrmallto:Shelita.Smith@dot.qov 1 Sent : Wednesday , Augus t10 , 201 1 9:4 5 A M To : Kristi n Leake Subject : FW : Docke tDOT-OST-2011-003 6

From : Johnson , Shelit a (OST) Sent : Friday , Augus t05 , 201 1 3:3 0 Pl ^ To : 'pmurphy@lopmurphy.com ' Subject : FW : Docke tDOT-OST-2011-003 6 Thi s i s wha t Heliservicio s Aerobell , S.A

. i s entitle d t o unde rth e bilatera l agreement
. I fthi s languag e i s oka ywit h yo u pleas e le tm e kno wbyemai l an d I wil l b e i ti n th e docket

. 

## Betwee n an

ypoin t o r point s i n Cost a Ric a and an ypoin t o r point s i n th e Unite d States ; an

d Betwee n an

ypoin t o r point s i n the territoryo f th e Unite d State s an d an y poin t o r point s i n a thir d countryo r countries , provide d that , suc h servic e constitute s par t o f a continuou s operation , wit ho r withou t a chang e o f aircraft , tha t include s servic e t o Cost a Ric a fo r th e purpos e o f carrying loca l traffi c betwee n Cost a Ric a an d th e territoryo f th e Unite d States .
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

DAY ELEV

 124.15

 123.68

 124.03

 123.90

 123.60

 123.56

 123.49

 123.46

 123.21

 122.85

 122.66

 123.02

 123.03

 123.41

 123.48

 123.04

 123.64

 123.64

 123.47

 123.29

 123.10

 123.36

 123.16

 123.06

 122.27

 123.24

 122.61

 122.45

 122.43

 122.50

 8,336

 8,111

 8,276

 8,214

 8,073

 8,054

 8,021

 8,007

 7,890

 7,724

 7,638

 7,800

 7,805

 7,984

 8,017

 7,810

 8,092

 8,092

 8,012

 7,927

 7,838

 7,960

 7,866

 7,819

 7,463

 7,904

 7,616

 7,544

 7,535

 7,566

STORAGE

-35

-225

+165

-62

-141

-19

-33

-14

-117

-166

-86

+162

+5

+179

+33

-207

+282

+0

-80

-85

-89

+122

-94

-47

-356

+441

-288

-72

-9

+31

CHANGE

2,020

1,924

2,122

2,020

1,988

2,041

2,040

2,054

1,998

1,956

1,993

2,116

2,050

2,030

1,950

1,816

1,973

1,835

1,795

1,798

1,793

1,893

1,799

1,809

1,667

2,055

1,687

1,798

1,827

1,867

INFLOW

 1,935

 1,935

 1,937

 1,948

 1,956

 1,949

 1,954

 1,958

 1,954

 1,937

 1,934

 1,932

 1,944

 1,837

 1,830

 1,817

 1,728

 1,732

 1,732

 1,739

 1,736

 1,729

 1,744

 1,731

 1,740

 1,731

 1,730

 1,732

 1,729

 1,748

POWER

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 4

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

SPILL

 60

 60

 60

 60

 60

 60

 60

 60

 60

 60

 60

 60

 60

 60

 60

 60

 60

 60

 60

 60

 60

 60

 60

 60

 60

 60

 60

 60

 60

 60

HATCHERY

 3

 2

 2

 3

 3

 2

 3

 3

 3

 3

 2

 2

 3

 3

 3

 3

 3

 3

 3

 2

 2

 2

 2

 2

 2

 2

 2

 2

 3

 3

C.F.S.

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

SEPTEMBER 2012 LAKE NATOMA DAILY OPERATIONS RUN DATE: October 1, 2012

IN LAKE

EVAP

C.F.S.

COMPUTED*

ACRE-FEET

RELEASE - C.F.S.

TOTALS -805 57,714 55,038 4 1,800 76

ACRE-FEET -805 114,476 109,168 8 3,570 151

COMMENTS:

* COMPUTED INFLOW IS THE SUM OF CHANGE IN STORAGE, RELEASES AND EVAPORATION.

SUMMARY

RELEASES (ACRE-FEET)

POWER 109,168

SPILL 8

FOLSOM SOUTH CANAL

HATCHERY

 2,380

 3,570

 8,371

FOLSOM

SOUTH 

CANAL

 40

 40

 40

 40

 40

 40

 40

 40

 40

 40

 40

 40

 40

 40

 40

 40

 40

 40

 40

 40

 40

 40

 40

 40

 40

 40

 40

 40

 40

 40

 1,200

 2,380

(1)

(1) INCHES OF EVAPORATION TAKEN FROM FOLSOM PAN.

RELEASES (ACRE-FEET)

TOTAL 115,126
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY ELEV

 1,198.20

 1,198.19

 1,198.17

 1,198.15

 1,198.12

 1,198.09

 1,198.07

 1,198.04

 1,198.02

 1,197.99

 1,197.97

 1,197.95

 1,197.93

 1,197.91

 1,197.88

 1,197.84

 1,197.81

 1,197.76

 1,197.72

 1,197.69

 1,197.66

 1,197.62

 1,197.60

 1,197.57

 1,197.53

 1,197.50

 1,197.47

 1,197.45

 1,197.41

 1,197.39

 1,197.36

 48.25

 48.23

 48.19

 48.16

 48.11

 48.05

 48.02

 47.97

 47.93

 47.88

 47.84

 47.81

 47.77

 47.74

 47.69

 47.62

 47.56

 47.48

 47.41

 47.35

 47.30

 47.23

 47.20

 47.15

 47.08

 47.03

 46.97

 46.94

 46.87

 46.83

 46.78

STORAGE

-0.04

-0.02

-0.04

-0.04

-0.05

-0.05

-0.04

-0.05

-0.04

-0.05

-0.04

-0.04

-0.04

-0.04

-0.05

-0.07

-0.05

-0.09

-0.07

-0.05

-0.05

-0.07

-0.04

-0.05

-0.07

-0.05

-0.05

-0.04

-0.07

-0.04

-0.05

CHANGE

0

6

0

0

-3

-7

3

1

10

-7

1

-1

-2

-1

3

-3

9

-7

-8

1

3

-8

11

5

-7

2

1

15

-3

10

4

INFLOW

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

SPILL

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 12

 12

 12

 12

 12

 12

 12

 11

 11

 11

 11

 11

 11

 11

 11

 11

 11

OUTLET

 17

 14

 17

 17

 22

 19

 20

 27

 27

 18

 18

 16

 15

 16

 17

 20

 24

 25

 15

 16

 17

 16

 18

 20

 17

 17

 16

 22

 21

 17

 19

C.F.S.

 .30

 .25

 .29

 .29

 .38

 .34

 .35

 .48

 .48

 .32

 .31

 .28

 .27

 .28

 .30

 .36

 .43

 .45

 .26

 .29

 .30

 .28

 .32

 .35

 .31

 .31

 .29

 .40

 .38

 .31

 .34

INCHES

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

PRECIP

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-ORLAND PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

JULY 2017 EAST PARK RESERVOIR DAILY OPERATIONS RUN DATE: 12/06/2017

IN LAKE

EVAPORATION

INCHES

C.F.S.

COMPUTED*

1000 ACRE-FEET

RELEASE - C.F.S.

TOTALS -1.54 28 208 0 580 10.30 .00

ACRE-FEET -1,540 56 413 0 1,150

COMMENTS:

* COMPUTED INFLOW IS THE SUM OF CHANGE IN STORAGE, RELEASES AND EVAPORATION.

DATA BASED ON 24 HOUR PERIOD ENDING 0800 AM.

SUMMARY RELEASE (ACRE-FEET)

SPILL 0

OUTLET

TOTAL

 413

 413

PRECIPITATION

THIS MONTH =

TO DATE =

 .00

JULY 1, 2017 .00

 48.28

OCT 1, 2016 TO DATE = 25.37