alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
NOTICE: NOT FOR OFFICIAL PUBLICATION. UNDER ARIZONA RULE OF THE SUPREME COURT 111(c), THIS DECISION IS NOT PRECEDENTIAL AND MAY BE CITED ONLY AS AUTHORIZED BY RULE

.

IN THE 

## A RIZONA 

## C OURT OF 

## A PPEALS

D IVISION O NE

STATE OF ARIZONA , Respondent ,

v.

ROBERT LANE LUKE , Petitioner

. No. 1 CA

- CR 2 2

- 0079 PRPC

Petition for Review from the Superior Court in Maricopa County

No. CR20 1 7

- 116639

- 001 The Honorable Michael S. Mandell , Judge
REVIEW GRANTED; RELIEF DENIED

COUNSEL Maricopa County Attorney’s Office , Phoenix By Krista Wood Counsel for Respondent Robert Lane Luke, Kingman Petitioner FILED 11-15-2022STATE v. LUKE Decision of the Court

2 MEMORANDUM DECISION Presiding Judge Maria Elena Cruz , Judge Angela K. Paton , and Judge Peter B. Swann delivered the decision of the Court.

PER CURIAM : ¶1 Petitioner Robert Lane Luke seeks review of the superior court’s order denying his petition for post

- conviction relief

. This is petitioner’s second successive petition. ¶2 Absent an abuse of discretion or error of law, this court will not disturb a superior court’s ruling on a petition for post

- conviction relief. State v. Gutierrez , 229 Ariz. 573, 577, ¶ 19 (2012). It is petitioner’s burden to show tha t the superior court abused its discretion by denying the petition for post

- conviction relief. See State v. Poblete , 227 Ariz. 537, 538, ¶ 1 (App. 2011) (petitioner has burden of establishing abuse of discretion on review). ¶3 We have reviewed the record in this matter, the superior court’s order denying the petition for post

- conviction relief, and the petition for review. We find that petitioner has not established an abuse of discretion. ¶4 We grant review and deny relief.
June 2023

STORAGE COMPUTED* RELEASE - C.F.S. EVAP

ACRE-FEET INFLOW FOLSOM C. F. S.

DAY ELEV IN LAKE CHANGE C.F.S. SOUTH POWER SPILL HATCHERY (1)

7,862

1 123.02 7,800 -62 12,221 6 4,155 7,986 102 3

2 122.94 7,764 -36 10,230 0 4,158 5,985 102 3

3 123.14 7,857 93 9,053 0 4,162 4,738 102 4

4 122.93 7,760 -97 9,001 0 4,208 4,736 102 4

5 122.54 7,584 -176 8,920 0 4,202 4,702 102 3

6 122.30 7,476 -108 8,896 9 4,213 4,623 102 3

7 122.39 7,517 41 8,966 25 4,210 4,606 102 2

8 122.41 7,526 9 8,973 40 4,205 4,618 102 3

9 122.63 7,625 99 9,055 50 4,211 4,638 102 4

10 123.14 7,857 232 8,191 50 4,138 3,782 102 2

11 122.98 7,782 -75 7,892 50 4,103 3,672 102 3

12 122.31 7,481 -301 7,761 50 4,134 3,625 102 2

13 121.90 7,299 -182 7,871 50 4,203 3,605 102 3

14 122.53 7,580 281 7,251 45 4,206 2,753 102 3

15 122.08 7,377 -203 6,495 35 4,237 2,219 102 4

16 122.99 7,787 410 6,231 35 4,240 1,643 102 4

17 123.33 7,946 159 5,646 35 4,313 1,112 102 4

18 123.62 8,082 136 5,184 33 4,567 408 102 5

19 122.84 7,719 -363 4,950 25 5,002 0 102 4

20 123.04 7,810 91 5,163 25 4,515 472 102 3

21 123.45 8,003 193 5,225 25 4,997 0 102 4

22 123.54 8,045 42 4,780 27 4,627 0 102 3

23 123.46 8,007 -38 4,226 37 4,103 0 102 3

24 123.78 8,158 151 4,133 45 3,906 0 102 4

25 123.75 8,144 -14 4,065 45 3,921 0 102 4

26 123.27 7,918 -226 3,985 45 3,948 0 102 4

27 123.29 7,927 9 4,111 45 3,955 0 102 4

28 123.80 8,167 240 4,206 45 3,934 0 102 4

29 123.74 8,139 -28 4,036 45 3,899 0 102 4

30 123.95 8,238 99 4,106 45 3,904 0 102 5

TOTALS 376 200,823 967 126,576 69,923 3,060 105

ACRE-FEET 376 398,332 1,918 251,063 138,692 6,070 208

*COMPUTED INFLOW IS SUM OF CHANGE IN STORAGE, RELEASES, AND EVAPORATION.

(1) EVAPORATION RECORDS TAKEN FROM FOLSOM PAN.

SUMMARY 

Release (ACRE-FEET)

Power 251,063 Folsom South Canal 1,918

Spill 138,692 Hatchery 6,070

Total = 397,743

Historical Archive and Report Database

Lake Natoma Daily Operations

Run Date: 7/18/2023
### Part B—Educational Partnerships
###### Editorial Note on Part 26

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 26 appear by T.D. ATF-451, 66 FR 21668, 21669, May 1, 2001.

#### § 26.65 Authority to approve bonds and consents of surety.

The appropriate TTB officer is authorized to approve all bonds and consents of surety filed under this part.

[T.D. 6551, 26 FR 1490, Feb. 22, 1961. Redesignated at 40 FR 16835, Apr. 15, 1975, and amended by T.D. ATF-251, 52 FR 19338, May 22, 1987]
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

DAY ELEV

 124.46

 123.98

 123.35

 123.67

 124.14

 123.75

 123.89

 121.43

 123.68

 123.89

 123.56

 123.24

 124.41

 124.32

 124.97

 124.14

 124.10

 123.44

 123.77

 124.21

 124.56

 123.75

 123.94

 123.72

 123.83

 123.64

 123.06

 123.22

 123.49

 123.87

 8,491

 8,252

 7,956

 8,106

 8,331

 8,144

 8,209

 7,102

 8,111

 8,209

 8,054

 7,904

 8,466

 8,421

 8,746

 8,331

 8,311

 7,998

 8,153

 8,366

 8,541

 8,144

 8,233

 8,129

 8,181

 8,092

 7,819

 7,894

 8,021

 8,200

STORAGE

+70

-239

-296

+150

+225

-187

+65

-1,107

+1,009

+98

-155

-150

+562

-45

+325

-415

-20

-313

+155

+213

+175

-397

+89

-104

+52

-89

-273

+75

+127

+179

CHANGE

1,070

908

1,124

1,828

1,904

1,705

1,874

1,342

2,395

1,933

1,812

1,814

2,183

1,870

2,060

1,690

1,882

1,742

1,951

1,987

1,961

1,680

1,944

1,844

1,921

1,856

1,765

1,931

1,930

1,968

INFLOW

 959

 963

 1,207

 1,675

 1,705

 1,708

 1,750

 1,811

 1,806

 1,804

 1,810

 1,804

 1,809

 1,802

 1,805

 1,808

 1,801

 1,808

 1,782

 1,788

 1,782

 1,789

 1,808

 1,805

 1,805

 1,807

 1,807

 1,797

 1,797

 1,822

POWER

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

SPILL

 56

 56

 56

 56

 56

 56

 56

 56

 56

 56

 56

 56

 56

 56

 56

 56

 56

 56

 56

 56

 56

 56

 56

 56

 56

 56

 56

 56

 48

 39

HATCHERY

 5

 5

 4

 5

 5

 5

 5

 4

 4

 4

 4

 4

 5

 5

 5

 5

 5

 6

 5

 6

 5

 5

 5

 5

 4

 4

 5

 5

 5

 5

C.F.S.

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

JUNE 2021 LAKE NATOMA DAILY OPERATIONS RUN DATE: July 8, 2021

IN LAKE

EVAP

C.F.S.

COMPUTED*

ACRE-FEET

RELEASE - C.F.S.

TOTALS -221 53,874 51,424 0 1,655 144

ACRE-FEET -221 106,859 102,000 0 3,283 286

COMMENTS:

* COMPUTED INFLOW IS THE SUM OF CHANGE IN STORAGE, RELEASES AND EVAPORATION.

SUMMARY

RELEASES (ACRE-FEET)

POWER 102,000

SPILL 0

FOLSOM SOUTH CANAL

HATCHERY

 1,513

 3,283

 8,421

FOLSOM

SOUTH 

 15

 4

 6

 16

 25

 30

 30

 29

 20

 20

 20

 26

 30

 30

 30

 30

 30

 30

 30

 30

 30

 30

 30

 30

 30

 34

 35

 35

 16

 12

 763

 1,513

(1)

(1) INCHES OF EVAPORATION TAKEN FROM FOLSOM PAN.

RELEASES (ACRE-FEET) 

TOTAL 106,796
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY ELEV

 1,012.43

 1,012.46

 1,012.31

 1,012.16

 1,012.13

 1,012.02

 1,011.97

 1,011.90

 1,011.72

 1,011.50

 1,011.31

 1,011.08

 1,010.90

 1,010.76

 1,010.62

 1,010.48

 1,010.36

 1,010.22

 1,010.05

 1,009.97

 1,009.87

 1,009.72

 1,009.57

 1,009.44

 1,009.14

 1,008.94

 1,008.72

 1,008.59

 1,008.43

 1,008.32

 1,008.13

 1,588.1

 1,588.3

 1,586.9

 1,585.5

 1,585.2

 1,584.1

 1,583.6

 1,583.0

 1,581.2

 1,579.1

 1,577.3

 1,575.1

 1,573.4

 1,572.0

 1,570.7

 1,569.4

 1,568.2

 1,566.9

 1,565.2

 1,564.5

 1,563.5

 1,562.1

 1,560.7

 1,559.4

 1,556.6

 1,554.7

 1,552.6

 1,551.4

 1,549.8

 1,548.8

 1,547.0

STORAGE

-0.9

+0.3

-1.4

-1.4

-0.3

-1.1

-0.5

-0.7

-1.7

-2.1

-1.8

-2.2

-1.7

-1.3

-1.3

-1.3

-1.1

-1.3

-1.6

-0.8

-1.0

-1.4

-1.4

-1.2

-2.9

-1.9

-2.1

-1.2

-1.5

-1.0

-1.8

CHANGE

1,491

1,273

1,656

1,540

1,609

1,699

1,786

1,869

1,570

1,574

1,580

1,524

1,693

1,749

2,080

2,027

1,893

1,897

1,868

2,191

2,021

1,455

1,442

1,448

1,216

1,234

1,070

1,509

1,685

1,709

1,443

INFLOW

 1,875

 1,069

 2,319

 2,187

 1,679

 2,134

 1,948

 2,120

 2,353

 2,551

 2,400

 2,549

 2,488

 2,302

 2,653

 2,612

 2,363

 2,476

 2,582

 2,527

 2,489

 2,098

 2,091

 1,989

 2,536

 2,122

 2,027

 2,026

 2,352

 2,137

 2,241

POWER

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

SPILL

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

OUTLET

 53

 59

 65

 81

 75

 99

 81

 87

 87

 87

 99

 87

 74

 121

 102

 90

 108

 96

 105

 49

 12

 77

 71

 83

 120

 71

 95

 104

 98

 98

 110

C.F.S.

 .17

 .19

 .21

 .26

 .24

 .32

 .26

 .28

 .28

 .28

 .32

 .28

 .24

 .39

 .33

 .29

 .35

 .31

 .34

 .16

 .04

 .25

 .23

 .27

 .39

 .23

 .31

 .34

 .32

 .32

 .36

INCHES

 .45

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .11

 .87

 .05

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

PRECIP

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

MAY 2002 NEW MELONES LAKE DAILY OPERATIONS RUN DATE: June 18, 2002

IN LAKE

EVAPORATION

INCHES

C.F.S.

COMPUTED*

1000 ACRE-FEET

RELEASE - C.F.S.

TOTALS -41.6 50,801 69,295 0 0 2,644 8.56 1.48

ACRE-FEET -41,600 100,764 137,447 0 0 5,244

COMMENTS:

* COMPUTED INFLOW IS THE SUM OF CHANGE IN STORAGE, RELEASES AND EVAPORATION.

SUMMARY

RELEASE (ACRE-FEET)

POWER 137,447

SPILL 0

OUTLET

TOTAL

 0

 137,447

PRECIPITATION

THIS MONTH =

TO DATE =

 1.48

JULY 1, 2001 24.34

 1,588.9

Table 13
#### John C. Burns, Doing Business under the Name of Burns Realty Company, Respondent, v. Leland D. Van Rensselaer, Appellant.

All concur.
EXHIBIT 31.1

      I, Francis O'Donnell, certify that:

      1.    I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-KSB of Coach
Industries Group, Inc.;

      2.    Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make
the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

      3.    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the
financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as
of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

      4.    The registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible
for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined
in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

            (a)   Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused
      such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our
      supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the
      registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us
      by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which
      this report is being prepared;

            (b)   Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure
      controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about
      the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end
      of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

            (c)   Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's
      internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the
      registrant's most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant's fourth fiscal
      quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or
      is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant's internal
      control over financial reporting; and

      5.    The registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed,
based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial
reporting, to the registrant's auditor and the audit committee of the
registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
functions):

            (a)   All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the
      design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are
      reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record,
      process, summarize and report financial information; and

            (b)   Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management
      or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's
      internal control over financial reporting.

Dated:  August 13, 2004

      /s/ Francis O'Donnell
      Francis O'Donnell, Chief Executive Officer
###### Editorial Note on Part 46

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 46 appear by T.D. ATF-457, 66 FR 32220, 32221, June 14, 2001.

#### § 46.209 Articles in vending machines.

There is no exemption for articles in vending machines. They are subject to the floor stocks tax and must be included in the dealer's inventory record.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

DAY ELEV

 549.77

 550.63

 551.41

 552.10

 552.92

 553.74

 554.56

 555.28

 556.00

 556.40

 556.84

 557.81

 558.03

 558.57

 558.92

 559.36

 559.77

 560.28

 560.86

 561.48

 562.03

 562.85

 563.21

 563.31

 563.59

 564.27

 564.88

 565.68

 566.54

 567.32

 392.5

 396.1

 399.4

 402.3

 405.7

 409.2

 412.7

 415.8

 418.9

 420.7

 422.6

 426.8

 427.8

 430.2

 431.7

 433.7

 435.5

 437.7

 440.3

 443.1

 445.5

 449.2

 450.8

 451.3

 452.6

 455.7

 458.4

 462.1

 466.0

 469.6

STORAGE

+3.7

+3.6

+3.3

+2.9

+3.5

+3.5

+3.5

+3.1

+3.1

+1.7

+1.9

+4.2

+1.0

+2.4

+1.5

+1.9

+1.8

+2.3

+2.6

+2.8

+2.5

+3.7

+1.6

+0.5

+1.3

+3.1

+2.8

+3.7

+4.0

+3.6

CHANGE

2,612

2,688

2,592

2,438

2,684

2,628

2,637

2,450

2,512

1,876

1,994

3,100

1,424

2,188

1,934

2,243

2,192

2,362

2,368

2,253

2,120

2,908

2,066

1,712

2,286

2,850

2,463

2,874

3,054

2,994

INFLOW

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 121

 305

 240

 232

 281

 328

 400

MADERA

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

SPILL

 594

 702

 757

 797

 742

 702

 702

 703

 756

 824

 846

 793

 749

 806

 965

 1,083

 1,106

 1,047

 899

 689

 703

 866

 1,071

 1,156

 1,127

 842

 608

 543

 543

 575

FRIANT-KERN

 13

 18

 29

 18

 36

 10

 11

 32

 34

 21

 30

 16

 34

 30

 38

 29

 24

 27

 22

 20

 29

 35

 28

 39

 35

 32

 41

 22

 7

 19

C.F.S.

 .10

 .13

 .21

 .13

 .26

 .07

 .08

 .23

 .24

 .15

 .21

 .11

 .24

 .21

 .27

 .20

 .17

 .19

 .15

 .14

 .20

 .24

 .19

 .27

 .24

 .22

 .28

 .15

 .05

 .13

INCHES

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .16

 .11

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .09

 .00

 .00

 .02

 .00

PRECIP

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

APRIL 2002 MILLERTON LAKE DAILY OPERATIONS RUN DATE: May 22, 2002

IN LAKE

EVAPORATION

INCHES

C.F.S.

COMPUTED*

1000 ACRE-FEET

RELEASE - C.F.S. 

TOTALS +80.8 72,502 1,907 24,296 0 779 5.46 .38

ACRE-FEET +80,826 143,808 3,783 48,191 0 1,545

COMMENTS:

* COMPUTED INFLOW IS THE SUM OF CHANGE IN STORAGE, RELEASES, PUMPING AND EVAPORATION.

SUMMARY

RELEASE (ACRE-FEET)

CANALS

FRIANT-KERN

MADERA

 48,191

 3,783 61,437

PRECIPITATION

THIS MONTH =

JULY 1, 2001 TO DATE = 10.53

 388.8

 9,463 0.38

CANALS

AT FRIANT

TOTAL RELEASES

OUTLET

 156

 156

 156

 157

 155

 154

 154

 154

 155

 155

 155

 155

 155

 155

 155

 150

 147

 148

 148

 148

 148

 148

 148

 168

 180

 181

 181

 183

 183

 183

RIVER

 4,771

 9,463

RIVER

Table 15
UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT 

FOR THE 

EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA 

Alexandria Division 

In the Matter of: 

 Chapter 13

STACY LYNN PHILLIPS

 Case No. 21-10085-KHK

 Debtor

AMENDED OBJECTION TO CONFIRMATION OF PLAN 

Thomas P. Gorman, Chapter 13 Trustee, has filed this amended objection to 

confirmation of your Chapter 13 Plan filed January 21, 2021. The cause for this 

additional objection is as follows: 

Violation of 11 U.S.C. §1325(a)(6) and 11 U.S.C. 1325(a)(3) – Feasibility and 

Good Faith. 

 Section 4B of Plan proposes to surrender collateral twice described as a 

“timeshare” to Service Finance Company. Service Finance Co., LLC 

has filed unsecured Proof of Claim #9-1 for that debt, and the 

supporting documents describe the collateral as “WINDOWS/DOORS”

(Pg. 5). Accordingly, the creditor secured by the “Sheraton Flex 

Vacation Plan Timeshare” has not been given notice of the Debtor’s 

intent to surrender. 

 

Date: _March 17, 2021______ __/s/Thomas P. Gorman ________ 

 Thomas P. Gorman 

 Chapter 13 Trustee 

 300 N. Washington Street, #400 

 Alexandria, VA 22314 

 (703) 836-2226 

 VSB 26421 

Case 21-10085-KHK Doc 16 Filed 03/17/21 Entered 03/17/21 10:08:56 Desc Main

Document Page 1 of 2
Amended Objection To Confirmation 

Stacy Lynn Phillips, Case # 21-10085-KHK 

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE 

I hereby certify that I have this 17th day of March, 2021, served via ECF to authorized 

users or mailed a true copy of the foregoing Amended Objection to Confirmation to the 

following parties. 

Stacy Lynn Phillips 

Chapter 13 Debtor 

5267 Quebec Place 

Woodbridge, VA 22193 

Martin C. Conway 

Attorney for Debtor 

Conway Law Group, PC 

12934 Harbor Drive, Suite 107 

Woodbridge, VA 22192 

 __/s/ Thomas P. Gorman______ 

 Thomas P. Gorman

Case 21-10085-KHK Doc 16 Filed 03/17/21 Entered 03/17/21 10:08:56 Desc Main

Document Page 2 of 2
#### Fulton *vs.*Golden.

The pendency of an action at law by A against B, in a court of another state, constitutes no bar to a suit in equity hero by B against A for the «ame object.

Bill for account. Plea.

*Mr. J. Alexander Fulton, pro se.*

*Air. F. T. Green,*for defendant.

The Chancellor.

To the complainant’s bill for an account, the defendant pleads the pendency of an action of account between himself and the complainant in the Court of Common Pleas, in and for the county of Armstrong, in the state of Pennsylvania. It appears by the plea, that that suit was instituted by Golden against Fulton. The pendency of a suit at law, if brought by Fulton against Golden for the identical object and purpose with which this suit is instituted, would constitute no bar to this action. *Way*v. *Bragaw,*1 C. *E. Green*213. Nor would the fact that such suit is pending in a court of *354another state -make any difference. *Bowne*v. *Joy,*9 *Johns.*221; *Walsh*v. *Durkin,*12 *Johns.*99; *Newell*v. *Newton,*10 *Pick.*470; *Howard*v. W. & *S. R. R. Co.,*2 *Harrington*471. The plea in this case, however, does not aver the pendency of any other suit by the complainant against the defendant, but of a suit by the latter against the former.

The plea will be overruled, with costs, and the defendant will be ordered to answer in thirty days.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

DAY ELEV

 1,001.51

 1,001.20

 1,001.02

 1,000.85

 1,000.73

 1,000.52

 1,000.37

 1,000.11

 999.68

 999.43

 998.96

 998.73

 998.39

 998.01

 997.59

 997.31

 997.03

 996.75

 996.56

 996.23

 995.72

 995.48

 994.99

 994.54

 994.22

 994.03

 993.83

 993.58

 993.41

 993.29

 1,485.1

 1,482.2

 1,480.6

 1,479.0

 1,477.9

 1,476.0

 1,474.6

 1,472.2

 1,468.2

 1,465.9

 1,461.6

 1,459.5

 1,456.4

 1,453.0

 1,449.1

 1,446.6

 1,444.1

 1,441.5

 1,439.8

 1,436.8

 1,432.2

 1,430.0

 1,425.6

 1,421.6

 1,418.7

 1,417.0

 1,415.2

 1,412.9

 1,411.4

 1,410.3

STORAGE

-3.2

-2.9

-1.7

-1.6

-1.1

-1.9

-1.4

-2.4

-3.9

-2.3

-4.3

-2.1

-3.1

-3.5

-3.8

-2.5

-2.5

-2.5

-1.7

-3.0

-4.6

-2.2

-4.4

-4.0

-2.9

-1.7

-1.8

-2.2

-1.5

-1.1

CHANGE

1,151

1,122

1,011

1,192

1,015

1,114

1,203

1,083

1,029

1,154

1,347

1,476

1,399

1,380

1,279

1,191

1,315

1,148

1,091

1,206

1,083

1,066

951

1,092

1,187

1,328

1,391

1,572

1,613

1,544

INFLOW

 2,727

 2,502

 1,822

 1,927

 1,509

 2,037

 1,851

 2,238

 2,959

 2,263

 3,450

 2,449

 2,870

 3,032

 3,137

 2,413

 2,537

 2,366

 1,874

 2,654

 3,355

 2,108

 3,148

 3,128

 2,582

 2,105

 2,224

 2,562

 2,293

 2,010

POWER

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

SPILL

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

OUTLET

 54

 63

 27

 54

 63

 51

 48

 51

 59

 47

 68

 86

 94

 97

 68

 62

 62

 62

 85

 59

 53

 50

 32

 3

 55

 84

 70

 139

 87

 75

C.F.S.

 .18

 .21

 .09

 .18

 .21

 .17

 .16

 .17

 .20

 .16

 .23

 .29

 .32

 .33

 .23

 .21

 .21

 .21

 .29

 .20

 .18

 .17

 .11

 .01

 .19

 .29

 .24

 .48

 .30

 .26

INCHES

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .03

 .03

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

PRECIP

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

APRIL 2008 NEW MELONES LAKE DAILY OPERATIONS RUN DATE: June 25, 2008

IN LAKE

EVAPORATION

INCHES

C.F.S.

COMPUTED*

1000 ACRE-FEET

RELEASE - C.F.S.

TOTALS -77.8 36,733 74,132 0 0 1,908 6.48 .06

ACRE-FEET -77,800 72,860 147,041 0 0 3,785

COMMENTS:

SUMMARY

RELEASE (ACRE-FEET)

POWER 147,041

SPILL 0

OUTLET

TOTAL

 0

 147,041

PRECIPITATION

THIS MONTH =

TO DATE =

 .06

JULY 1, 2007 21.33

 1,488.3

Table 13