alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
March 2024

STORAGE COMPUTED* RELEASE - C.F.S.

1000 ACRE-FEET INFLOW RIVER PUMPING EVAPORATION PRECIP

DAY ELEV IN LAKE CHANGE C.F.S. POWER SPILL OUTLET PLANT C. F. S. INCHES INCHES

601.8

1 429.07 605.4 3.5 7,879 6,038 11 0 48 0 0.00 0.64

2 431.33 625.6 20.2 16,281 6,037 0 0 49 0 0.00 0.22

3 432.66 637.7 12.1 12,558 6,422 0 0 55 0 0.00 0.09

4 433.36 644.1 6.4 9,386 4,522 1,512 61 54 12 0.04 0.00

5 433.75 647.6 3.6 7,771 5,862 3 28 54 21 0.07 0.00

6 433.93 649.3 1.7 6,996 6,087 0 0 56 21 0.07 0.00

7 433.94 649.4 0.1 6,606 4,579 1,905 0 55 21 0.07 0.00

8 433.85 648.5 -0.8 5,689 3,947 2,077 0 57 24 0.08 0.00

9 433.74 647.5 -1.0 5,573 3,981 2,019 0 57 24 0.08 0.00

10 433.54 645.7 -1.8 5,113 3,840 2,116 0 58 24 0.08 0.00

11 433.30 643.5 -2.2 4,793 2,926 2,893 0 60 24 0.08 0.00

12 433.11 641.8 -1.7 5,452 3,293 2,953 0 60 24 0.08 0.10

13 433.22 642.8 1.0 5,911 5,291 0 0 59 52 0.17 0.00

14 433.29 643.4 0.6 5,901 5,221 223 0 63 70 0.23 0.00

15 433.41 644.5 1.1 5,657 4,942 7 0 77 76 0.25 0.00

16 433.50 645.3 0.8 5,509 4,961 5 0 87 40 0.13 0.00

17 433.47 645.1 -0.3 5,166 4,527 649 0 92 37 0.12 0.00

18 433.52 645.5 0.5 5,531 5,180 0 0 89 31 0.10 0.00

19 433.69 647.1 1.6 5,676 4,771 0 0 82 37 0.12 0.00

20 433.82 648.3 1.2 5,741 4,742 262 0 84 52 0.17 0.00

21 433.97 649.7 1.4 5,923 4,948 154 0 87 40 0.13 0.00

22 434.22 652.0 2.3 6,119 4,842 11 0 87 15 0.05 0.05

23 434.97 658.9 6.9 8,251 4,678 0 0 79 0 0.00 0.69

24 435.77 666.3 7.4 8,409 4,569 0 0 79 9 0.03 0.28

25 436.46 672.8 6.5 7,815 4,454 0 0 77 31 0.10 0.00

26 437.00 677.8 5.1 6,789 4,115 19 0 72 31 0.10 0.00

27 437.42 681.8 4.0 6,710 4,642 0 0 70 0 0.00 0.36

28 437.77 685.1 3.3 6,628 4,836 0 0 69 57 0.18 0.19

29 438.70 693.9 8.8 8,494 3,978 0 0 67 0 0.00 0.27

30 439.50 701.6 7.6 8,011 4,093 0 0 68 0 0.00 0.27

31 440.12 707.5 5.9 6,949 3,676 169 0 74 35 0.11 0.03

TOTALS 105.8 219,287 146,000 16,988 89 2,125 808 2.64 3.19

ACRE-FEET 105,800 434,956 289,591 33,696 177 4,215 1,603

* COMPUTED INFLOW IS THE SUM OF CHANGE IN STORAGE, RELEASES, PUMPING AND EVAPORATION

Release (ACRE-FEET)

Power 289,591 Outlet 177

Spill 33,696 Pumping Plant 4,215

Total = 327,678

Precipitation

This month = 3.19

October 01, 2023 To date = 18.58

SUMMARY

Historical Archive and Report Database

Folsom Lake Daily Operations

Run Date: 4/23/2024
# United States Court of Appeals For the First Circuit

No. 17-1036 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Appellant,

v. MARQUIS AIKEN, Appellee.

**ERRATA SHEET** The opinion of this Court, issued on December 18, 2017, is amended as follows: On page 9, line 8, "premise" is replaced with "premises". On page 11, line 16, "While the majority acknowledges" is replaced with "While we recognize"
Dismiss and Opinion Filed June 30, 2015.

In The 

## Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

No. 05

- 15

- 00018

- CR
DEVONTE WEBB , Appellant

V. THE STATE OF TEXAS , Appellee
On Appeal from the Criminal District Court No. 3

Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. F13

- 56001

- J


### MEMORANDUM OPINION Before Justices Bridges, Lang, and Schenck Opinion by Justice Lang Devonte Webb was charged by indictment with capital murder. Appellant plea ded guilty

p ursuant to a plea agreement that reduced the charge to aggravated robbery and capped punishment at forty years’ imprisonment. T he trial court accepted the plea agreement, found appellant guilty, and sentenced him to forty years’ imprisonment. See Shankel v. State , 119 S.W.3d 808, 813 (Tex. Crim. App. 2003). The trial court initially certified that the case does not involve a plea bargain and appellant has the right to appeal. However, in response to a motion by appellant’s counsel to

determin e our jurisdiction, we ordered the trial court to review the record and to file an amended certification that accurately reflects the trial court proceedings. The trial court prepared an

amended certification that states the case involves a plea bargain a nd appellant has no right to– 2

–

appeal. The trial court noted that appellant was informed on the record that if the trial court followed the plea agreement, appellant would have no right to appeal. The trial court’s amended certification is supported by the record. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P . 25.2(a), (2); Cortez v. State , 420 S.W.3d 803 (Tex. Crim. App. 2013); Dears v. State , 154 S.W.3d 610, 614 (Tex. Crim. App.
2005). We dismiss the appeal for want of jurisdiction.

Do Not Publish T EX

. R. A PP

. P . 47 150018F.U05 /Douglas S. Lang/ DOUGLAS S. LANG JUSTICE– 3

– 

## Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

JUDGMENT

DEVONTE WEBB, Appellant

No. 05

- 15

- 00018

- CR V. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee On Appeal from the Criminal District Court No. 3, Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. F13

- 56001

- J. Opinion delivered by Justice Lang, Justices Bridges and Schenck participating. Based on the Court’s opinion of this date, we DISMISS the appeal for want of jurisdiction.

Judgment entered this 30th day of June, 2015.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from 
Growth Hotel Investors II 1997 Year-End 10-K and is qualified in its entirety 
by reference to such 10-K filing.
</LEGEND>
<CIK> 0000791346
<NAME> GROWTH HOTEL INVESTORS II 
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000 
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1997   
<CASH>                                           4,228
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0<F1>
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0   
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   7,660   
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0<F1>
<BONDS>                                              0     
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0     
<PREFERRED>                                          0  
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                       5,370    
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     7,660    
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                92,449    
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                25,552    
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               2,355    
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                      0
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    49,150     
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   783.90<F2>
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
<FN>
<F1>Registrant has an unclassified balance sheet.
<F2>Multiplier is 1.
</FN>
        


</TABLE>
#### STATE, Respondent, v. PARLIN, Appellant.

(269 N. W. 81.)

(File No. 7920.

Opinion filed October 5, 1936.)

*573
      *M. Harry O’Brien,*of Highmore, for Appellant.

*M. C. Cunningham,*of Highmore, *Walter Conway,*Atty. Gen., and *W. B. Weygint,*Asst. Atty. 'Gen., for the State.

PER' CURIAM,

This is a motion to dismiss an appeal. The defendant was convicted of the crime of assault and battery in the county court of Hyde county, S. D. The judgment of conviction was entered! -by the trial court on June 8, 1935. The defendant presented no application for a new trial to the judge of the county court until the 4th day of November, 1935, and the application then presentedl was not made upon the ground of newly discovered evidence.

Section 4946, R. C. 1919, provides as follows: “The application for a new trial must be made before judgment, but the court or judge thereof may, upon good cause shown, allow such application to be made at any time within thirty days after the entry of such judgment. And) motions for a new trial on the ground of newly discovered evidence may be made after judgment before the court or judge thereof, at any time before the next succeeding term, or at any time thereafter upon leave of court upon good cause shown.”

Construing the above statute, this court held in the case of State v. Holborn, 22 S. D. 425, 118 N. W. 704, that the above statute was exclusive, and that there was no law authorizing the circuit court to enlarge the statutory time in which an application for a new trail might be made in a criminal action. We are of the opinion that under the above statute the only power of the trial court to entertain an application in a criminal action for a new trial, not based on newly discovered evidence, is, as stated in the statute, either before judgment or within 30 days after the entry of judgment on good cause being shown.

The application in the present case was not made until almost 5 months after the entry of judgment, and it follows that *574the appeal, in so far as it purports to be an appeal from the order denying the motion for a new trial, must be, and the same hereby is, dismissed.

POLLEY, P. J., and CAMPBELL, WARREtN and RUDOLPH, JJ., concur.

ROBERTS, J., not sitting.
### §2551. Right of action

Except as provided under this subpart, the provisions of this part do not create any right of action under the laws of the United States with respect to allegations that any standards-related activity engaged in within the United States violates the obligations of the United States under the Agreement.

(Pub. L. 96–39, title IV, §421, July 26, 1979, 93 Stat. 247.)
First Department,

March, 1914.

#### James J. Crowe, Respondent, *v.*William F. Mattes, Appellant.

Appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, entered in the New York county clerk’s office on the 9th day of January, 1914, denying a motion to vacate an order for the examination of defendant before trial.

Per Curiam:

The order appealed from should be reversed and the motion granted to the extent that defendant’s examination will be limited to the question whether or not the purchaser Shaake, claimed to have been produced by plaintiff, was presented to the defendant by said plaintiff, and the question as to the price at which defendant sold and conveyed his café and saloon business to said Shaake, without costs to either party. Present — Ingraham, P. J., McLaughlin, Clarke, Scott and Hotchkiss, JJ. Order reversed and motion granted to the extent stated in opinion, without costs. Order to be settled on notice.
H H

H H

H

H î

î

î

î

î

î" "

" "

"

"

¬«335

¬«335

B E L F IO R E R D

T A R B AY R D

B AY

V IE W D R

¬«335

¬«335

CALVERT CO

DORCH

ESTER

C

O

DORCHESTER

CO

ST. MARY'S

CO

ST. MARY'S CO

CALVERT

CO

CHESAPEAKE BAY

CHESAPEAKE BAY

Hooper

Island

Lighthouse

Cedar Point

Lighthouse

Hooper

Island

Lighthouse

Opossum

Island Opossum Island

Barren

Island

Houston

Point

Aaron Cove

Cove

Point

Houston

Cove

Aaron

Cove

Barren

Island

Point

Cedar

Point

Taylors

Island

Honga

Richland

Point

Saint

Marys

City

Solomons

Island

Barren

Island

Golden

Hill

Point No

Point

Cove

Point

81

42

84

37

3

20'

42

30"

20'

41

42

3

47

44

44

42

42

3

43

42

80 3

42

30"

3

30"

30"

17'

86

42

30" 83 3

42

40

20'

76°

15'

1

3 82

42

E

20'

38° 90

22' 3 22'

35

42

36

000m

3 3

15'

83

38°

86

42

42

39

3 89 000m

42

37

80 3 87 3

36

42

40

42

N

000m

42

N

38

17'

42

48

47

3 85

38

3

42

15'

88

30"

FEET

82

30"

3

42

43

500

3

42

46

42

42

45

3

42

90

35

42

45

76°

3

38°

89 E

76°

38°

000 FEET

250

41

17'

3 88

42

85

42

17'

22'

22'

000m

48

46

42

81

42

15'

76°

3 84 30"

FEET

1

220

000

000

520 000 FEET

U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U. S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY

MARYLAND

ADJOINING 7.5' QUADRANGLES

QUADRANGLE LOCATION

BARREN ISLAND, MD

2011

Interstate Route State Route

ROAD CLASSIFICATION

Ramp 4WD

US Route Local Road

WX Interstate Route /. US Route H State Route

BARREN ISLAND QUADRANGLE

MARYLAND

7.5-MINUTE SERIES

This map was produced to conform with version 0.5.10

of the USGS US Topo Product Standard.

A metadata file associated with this product is draft version 0.5.15

CONTOURS NOT PRESENT BECAUSE AVAILABLE ELEVATION

DATA DO NOT MEET ACCURACY REQUIREMENTS

SCALE 1:24 000

1 0.5 0

MILES

1

1000 0 1000 2000 3000 4000 5000 6000 7000 8000 9000 10000

FEET

1000 500 0 METERS 1000 2000

1 0.5 0 KILOMETERS 1 2

Imagery..................................................NAIP, August 2009

Roads...............................................©2006-2010 Tele Atlas

Names...............................................................GNIS, 2010

Hydrography.................National Hydrography Dataset, 2009

Contours..........................................................Not Available

Boundaries..............Census, IBWC, IBC, USGS, 1972 - 2010

North American Datum of 1983 (NAD83)

World Geodetic System of 1984 (WGS84). Projection and

1 000-meter grid: Universal Transverse Mercator, Zone 18S

Produced by the United States Geological Survey

10 000-foot ticks: Maryland Coordinate System of 1983

U.S. National Grid

100,000-m Square ID

Grid Zone Designation

UH

18S

×

Ø

MN

GN

UTM GRID AND 2011 MAGNETIC NORTH DECLINATION AT CENTER OF SHEET

0° 49 ́

14 MILS

11° 5 ́

197 MILS
Editorial Note on Part 4
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 4 appear by T.D. ATF-425, 65 FR 11890, Mar. 7, 2000.

§ 4.32a Voluntary disclosure of major food allergens. ( a ) *Definitions.* For purposes of this section the following terms have the meanings indicated. ( 1 ) *Major food allergen.* *Major food allergen* means any of the following: ( i ) Milk, egg, fish (for example, bass, flounder, or cod), Crustacean shellfish (for example, crab, lobster, or shrimp), tree nuts (for example, almonds, pecans, or walnuts), wheat, peanuts, and soybeans; or
( ii ) A food ingredient that contains protein derived from a food specified in paragraph (a)(1)(i) of this section, except: ( A ) Any highly refined oil derived from a food specified in paragraph (a)(1)(i) of this section and any ingredient derived from such highly refined oil; or
( B ) A food ingredient that is exempt from major food allergen labeling requirements pursuant to a petition for exemption approved by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) under 21 U.S.C. 343(w)(6) or pursuant to a notice submitted to FDA under 21 U.S.C. 343(w)(7), provided that the food ingredient meets the terms or conditions, if any, specified for that exemption.
( 2 ) *Name of the food source from which each major food allergen is derived. Name of the food source from which each major food allergen is derived* means the name of the food as listed in paragraph (a)(1)(i) of this section, except that: ( i ) In the case of a tree nut, it means the name of the specific type of nut (for example, almonds, pecans, or walnuts);
( ii ) In the case of Crustacean shellfish, it means the name of the species of Crustacean shellfish (for example, crab, lobster, or shrimp); and
( iii ) The names “egg” and “peanuts”, as well as the names of the different types of tree nuts, may be expressed in either the singular or plural form, and the term “soy”, soybean”, or “soya” may be used instead of “soybeans”.
( b ) *Voluntary labeling standards.* Major food allergens (defined in paragraph (a)(1) of this section) used in the production of a wine may, on a voluntary basis, be declared on any label affixed to the container. However, if any one major food allergen is voluntarily declared, all major food allergens used in production of the wine, including major food allergens used as fining or processing agents, must be declared, except when covered by a petition for exemption approved by the appropriate TTB officer under § 4.32b. The major food allergens declaration must consist of the word “Contains” followed by a colon and the name of the food source from which each major food allergen is derived (for example, “Contains: egg”).
( c ) *Cross reference.* For mandatory labeling requirements applicable to wines containing FD&C Yellow No. 5 and sulfites, see §§ 4.32(c) and (e).
[T.D. TTB-53, 71 FR 42267, July 26, 2006]
COURT OF APPEALS

EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

EL PASO, TEXAS

DAVID HERRERA,

 Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS,

 Appellee.

§

§

§

§

§

§

No. 08-13-00218-CR

Appeal from the

396th District Court

of Tarrant County, Texas

(TC# 1296382R)

MEMORANDUM OPINION

David Herrera has filed a motion to dismiss his appeal. Rule 42.2(a) permits an appellate 

court to dismiss a criminal appeal on the appellant’s motion at any time before the court’s 

decision. TEX.R.APP.P. 42.2(a). Finding that Appellant has complied with the requirements of 

Rule 42.2(a), we grant the motion and dismiss the appeal.

October 29, 2014

YVONNE T. RODRIGUEZ, Justice

Before McClure, C.J., Rodriguez, and Barajas, C.J. (Senior Judge)

Barajas, C.J. Senior Judge (Sitting by assignment, not participating)
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

DAY ELEV

 398.92

 398.33

 397.89

 397.51

 397.05

 396.62

 396.29

 395.89

 395.53

 395.02

 394.63

 394.49

 394.31

 394.04

 393.80

 393.58

 393.43

 393.12

 392.93

 392.77

 392.62

 392.52

 392.35

 392.12

 391.96

 391.87

 391.84

 391.68

 391.39

 391.08

 372.3

 368.4

 365.6

 363.1

 360.1

 357.4

 355.3

 352.7

 350.5

 347.2

 344.8

 343.9

 342.8

 341.1

 339.6

 338.3

 337.3

 335.4

 334.3

 333.3

 332.4

 331.8

 330.7

 329.3

 328.3

 327.8

 327.6

 326.7

 324.9

 323.0

STORAGE

-3.4

-3.9

-2.9

-2.5

-3.0

-2.8

-2.1

-2.5

-2.3

-3.2

-2.4

-0.9

-1.1

-1.7

-1.5

-1.4

-0.9

-1.9

-1.2

-1.0

-0.9

-0.6

-1.0

-1.4

-1.0

-0.5

-0.2

-1.0

-1.7

-1.9

CHANGE

1,411

984

1,211

1,385

1,035

880

1,386

996

1,169

990

891

1,286

925

1,322

1,103

1,185

1,173

844

1,152

1,237

1,207

1,173

1,034

811

1,051

1,213

1,523

1,434

753

702

INFLOW

 2,761

 2,582

 2,308

 2,269

 2,245

 1,962

 2,138

 1,994

 2,020

 2,314

 1,843

 1,445

 1,243

 1,905

 1,588

 1,596

 1,364

 1,540

 1,475

 1,507

 1,440

 1,263

 1,356

 1,307

 1,318

 1,242

 1,364

 1,667

 1,427

 1,424

POWER

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

SPILL

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

OUTLET

 276

 277

 280

 281

 251

 260

 255

 244

 255

 257

 241

 238

 230

 228

 228

 233

 235

 231

 223

 185

 191

 189

 190

 193

 198

 206

 210

 205

 187

 186

PUMPING

 69

 68

 68

 72

 37

 45

 56

 43

 40

 44

 36

 44

 19

 40

 35

 41

 41

 37

 43

 37

 37

 29

 10

 18

 26

 38

 40

 48

 20

 34

C.F.S.

 .31

 .31

 .31

 .33

 .17

 .21

 .26

 .20

 .19

 .21

 .17

 .21

 .09

 .19

 .17

 .20

 .20

 .18

 .21

 .18

 .18

 .14

 .05

 .09

 .13

 .19

 .20

 .24

 .10

 .17

INCHES

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .03

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .04

 .00

PRECIP

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

SEPTEMBER 2007 FOLSOM LAKE DAILY OPERATIONS RUN DATE: October 31, 2007

IN LAKE

EVAPORATION

INCHES

C.F.S. PLANT

COMPUTED*

1000 ACRE-FEET

RELEASE - C.F.S. 

 RIVER 

TOTALS -52.8 33,466 51,907 0 0 6,863 1,215 5.79 .07

ACRE-FEET -52,800 66,380 102,958 0 0 13,613 2,410

COMMENTS:

* COMPUTED INFLOW IS THE SUM OF CHANGE IN STORAGE, RELEASES, PUMPING AND EVAPORATION.

SUMMARY

RELEASE (ACRE-FEET)

POWER 102,958

SPILL

PUMPING PLANT

 0

 13,613

TOTAL 116,571

PRECIPITATION

THIS MONTH =

JULY 1, 2007 TO DATE = .07

 375.6

OUTLET 0 .07

Table 11
### §§241 to 256. Repealed. June 17, 1930, ch. 497, title IV, §651(a)(1), 46 Stat. 762, eff. June 18, 1930

Sections, act Sept. 21, 1922, ch. 356, title IV, §§431–446, 42 Stat. 950–953, related to form and contents of manifests, clearance documents, bonds, permits and penalties for violation of same.

Provisions of Tariff Act of 1930 corresponding to sections 241 to 256, see sections 1431 to 1446 of this title, respectively.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY ELEV

 515.74

 516.15

 516.65

 516.94

 517.38

 517.80

 518.10

 518.50

 519.03

 519.58

 519.95

 520.29

 520.73

 520.99

 521.33

 521.53

 521.63

 521.69

 521.63

 521.65

 521.84

 522.17

 522.60

 522.65

 522.38

 522.34

 522.11

 521.96

 521.93

 521.80

 521.61

 265.0

 266.3

 268.0

 269.0

 270.5

 271.9

 272.9

 274.2

 276.0

 277.9

 279.2

 280.4

 281.9

 282.8

 283.9

 284.6

 285.0

 285.2

 285.0

 285.1

 285.7

 286.9

 288.4

 288.5

 287.6

 287.5

 286.7

 286.1

 286.0

 285.6

 284.9

STORAGE

+1.4

+1.4

+1.7

+1.0

+1.5

+1.4

+1.0

+1.4

+1.8

+1.9

+1.3

+1.2

+1.5

+0.9

+1.2

+0.7

+0.3

+0.2

-0.2

+0.1

+0.7

+1.1

+1.5

+0.2

-0.9

-0.1

-0.8

-0.5

-0.1

-0.5

-0.7

CHANGE

1,351

1,407

1,635

1,428

1,721

1,655

1,483

1,595

1,860

1,934

1,666

1,712

1,818

1,343

1,418

1,276

1,337

1,419

1,352

1,468

1,404

1,379

1,635

1,107

547

912

673

839

948

796

671

INFLOW

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

MADERA

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

SPILL

 542

 609

 672

 818

 857

 826

 852

 796

 814

 856

 905

 1,004

 930

 759

 699

 820

 1,025

 1,138

 1,246

 1,164

 764

 495

 571

 707

 715

 694

 786

 797

 697

 715

 697

FRIANT-KERN

 18

 5

 15

 16

 12

 10

 15

 9

 33

 24

 16

 13

 19

 27

 19

 1

 31

 30

 25

 27

 22

 19

 21

 26

 21

 3

 6

 20

 17

 22

 20

C.F.S.

 .17

 .05

 .14

 .15

 .11

 .09

 .14

 .08

 .30

 .22

 .14

 .12

 .17

 .24

 .17

 .01

 .28

 .27

 .22

 .24

 .20

 .17

 .19

 .23

 .19

 .03

 .05

 .18

 .15

 .20

 .18

INCHES

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .02

 .01

 .03

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

PRECIP

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

MARCH 2008 MILLERTON LAKE DAILY OPERATIONS RUN DATE: June 25, 2008

IN LAKE

EVAPORATION

INCHES

C.F.S.

COMPUTED*

1000 ACRE-FEET

RELEASE - C.F.S. 

TOTALS +21.3 41,789 0 24,970 0 562 5.08 .06

ACRE-FEET +21,318 82,888 0 49,528 0 1,115

COMMENTS:

* COMPUTED INFLOW IS THE SUM OF CHANGE IN STORAGE, RELEASES, PUMPING AND EVAPORATION.

SUMMARY

RELEASE (ACRE-FEET)

CANALS

FRIANT-KERN

MADERA

 49,528

 0 60,461

PRECIPITATION

THIS MONTH =

JULY 1, 2007 TO DATE = 10.72

 263.6

 10,933 0.06

CANALS

AT FRIANT

TOTAL RELEASES

OUTLET

 105

 105

 105

 105

 105

 105

 105

 105

 105

 105

 106

 106

 106

 106

 106

 106

 106

 146

 186

 242

 286

 286

 286

 286

 286

 286

 286

 286

 286

 286

 286

RIVER

 5,512

 10,933

RIVER

Table 15