20046 Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 69 / Monday, April 11, 2011 / Notices 

Inc., Corporate Center Division, Group 

Technology Infrastructure Services, 

Distributed Systems and Storage Group, 

Stamford, Connecticut (TA–W–75,009); and 

UBS Group, a division of UBS AG, also 

known as UBS Financial Services, Inc., and/ 

or UBS–GLB (Americas), Inc., formerly 

known as Brinson Partners, Inc., Corporate 

Center Division, Group Technology 

Infrastructure Services, Distributed Systems 

and Storage Group, Chicago, Illinois (TA–W– 

75,009A); and UBS Group, a division of UBS 

AG, also known as UBS Financial Services, 

Inc., and/or UBS–GLB (Americas), Inc., 

Corporate Center Division, Group 

Technology Infrastructure Services, 

Distributed Systems and Storage Group, New 

York, New York (TA–W–75,009B), who 

became totally or partially separated from 

employment on or after December 15, 2009, 

through February 8, 2013, and all workers in 

the group threatened with total or partial 

separation from employment on date of 

certification through two years from the date 

of certification, are eligible to apply for 

adjustment assistance under Chapter 2 of 

Title II of the Trade Act of 1974, as 

amended.’’ 

Signed in Washington, DC, this 31st day of 

March, 2011. 

Michael W. Jaffe, 

Certifying Officer, Office of Trade Adjustment 

Assistance. 

[FR Doc. 2011–8494 Filed 4–8–11; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4510–FN–P 

DEPARTMENT OF LABOR 

Employment and Training 

Administration 

Notice of Determinations Regarding 

Eligibility To Apply for Worker 

Adjustment Assistance 

In accordance with Section 223 of the 

Trade Act of 1974, as amended (19 

U.S.C. 2273), the Department of Labor 

herein presents summaries of 

determinations regarding eligibility to 

apply for trade adjustment assistance for 

workers by (TA–W) number issued 

during the period of March 21, 2011 

through March 25, 2011. 

In order for an affirmative 

determination to be made for workers of 

a primary firm and a certification issued 

regarding eligibility to apply for worker 

adjustment assistance, each of the group 

eligibility requirements of Section 

222(a) of the Act must be met. 

I. Under Section 222(a)(2)(A), the 

following must be satisfied: 

(1) A significant number or proportion 

of the workers in such workers’ firm 

have become totally or partially 

separated, or are threatened to become 

totally or partially separated; 

(2) The sales or production, or both, 

of such firm have decreased absolutely; 

and 

(3) One of the following must be 

satisfied: 

(A) Imports of articles or services like 

or directly competitive with articles 

produced or services supplied by such 

firm have increased; 

(B) Imports of articles like or directly 

competitive with articles into which one 

or more component parts produced by 

such firm are directly incorporated, 

have increased; 

(C) Imports of articles directly 

incorporating one or more component 

parts produced outside the United 

States that are like or directly 

competitive with imports of articles 

incorporating one or more component 

parts produced by such firm have 

increased; 

(D) Imports of articles like or directly 

competitive with articles which are 

produced directly using services 

supplied by such firm, have increased; 

and 

(4) The increase in imports 

contributed importantly to such 

workers’ separation or threat of 

separation and to the decline in the 

sales or production of such firm; or 

II. Section 222(a)(2)(B) all of the 

following must be satisfied: 

(1) A significant number or proportion 

of the workers in such workers’ firm 

have become totally or partially 

separated, or are threatened to become 

totally or partially separated; 

(2) One of the following must be 

satisfied: 

(A) There has been a shift by the 

workers’ firm to a foreign country in the 

production of articles or supply of 

services like or directly competitive 

with those produced/supplied by the 

workers’ firm; 

(B) There has been an acquisition 

from a foreign country by the workers’ 

firm of articles/services that are like or 

directly competitive with those 

produced/supplied by the workers’ firm; 

and 

(3) The shift/acquisition contributed 

importantly to the workers’ separation 

or threat of separation. 

In order for an affirmative 

determination to be made for adversely 

affected workers in public agencies and 

a certification issued regarding 

eligibility to apply for worker 

adjustment assistance, each of the group 

eligibility requirements of Section 

222(b) of the Act must be met. 

(1) A significant number or proportion 

of the workers in the public agency have 

become totally or partially separated, or 

are threatened to become totally or 

partially separated; 

(2) The public agency has acquired 

from a foreign country services like or 

directly competitive with services 

which are supplied by such agency; and 

(3) The acquisition of services 

contributed importantly to such 

workers’ separation or threat of 

separation. 

In order for an affirmative 

determination to be made for adversely 

affected secondary workers of a firm and 

a certification issued regarding 

eligibility to apply for worker 

adjustment assistance, each of the group 

eligibility requirements of Section 

222(c) of the Act must be met. 

(1) A significant number or proportion 

of the workers in the workers’ firm have 

become totally or partially separated, or 

are threatened to become totally or 

partially separated; 

(2) The workers’ firm is a Supplier or 

Downstream Producer to a firm that 

employed a group of workers who 

received a certification of eligibility 

under Section 222(a) of the Act, and 

such supply or production is related to 

the article or service that was the basis 

for such certification; and 

(3) Either— 

(A) The workers’ firm is a supplier 

and the component parts it supplied to 

the firm described in paragraph (2) 

accounted for at least 20 percent of the 

production or sales of the workers’ firm; 

or 

(B) A loss of business by the workers’ 

firm with the firm described in 

paragraph (2) contributed importantly to 

the workers’ separation or threat of 

separation. 

In order for an affirmative 

determination to be made for adversely 

affected workers in firms identified by 

the International Trade Commission and 

a certification issued regarding 

eligibility to apply for worker 

adjustment assistance, each of the group 

eligibility requirements of Section 222(f) 

of the Act must be met. 

(1) The workers’ firm is publicly 

identified by name by the International 

Trade Commission as a member of a 

domestic industry in an investigation 

resulting in— 

(A) An affirmative determination of 

serious injury or threat thereof under 

section 202(b)(1); 

(B) An affirmative determination of 

market disruption or threat thereof 

under section 421(b)(1); or 

(C) An affirmative final determination 

of material injury or threat thereof under 

section 705(b)(1)(A) or 735(b)(1)(A) of 

the Tariff Act of 1930 (19 U.S.C. 

1671d(b)(1)(A) and 1673d(b)(1)(A)); 

(2) The petition is filed during the 

1-year period beginning on the date on 

which— 

(A) A summary of the report 

submitted to the President by the 


srobinson on DSKHWCL6B1PROD with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 69 / Monday, April 11, 2011 / Notices 20047 

International Trade Commission under 

section 202(f)(1) with respect to the 

affirmative determination described in 

paragraph (1)(A) is published in the 

Federal Register under section 202(f)(3); 

or 

(B) Notice of an affirmative 

determination described in 

subparagraph (1) is published in the 

Federal Register; and 

(3) The workers have become totally 

or partially separated from the workers’ 

firm within— 

(A) The 1-year period described in 

paragraph (2); or 

(B) Notwithstanding section 223(b)(1), 

the 1-year period preceding the 1-year 

period described in paragraph (2). 

Affirmative Determinations for Worker 

Adjustment Assistance 

The following certifications have been 

issued. The date following the company 

name and location of each 

determination references the impact 

date for all workers of such 

determination. 

The following certifications have been 

issued. The requirements of Section 

222(a)(2)(A) (increased imports) of the 

Trade Act have been met. 

TA–W No. Subject firm Location Impact date 

74,748 ................ Anderson Hardwood Floors, LLC, Shaw Industries Group, Inc., 07, Hard 

Surfaces Division.

Patten, ME ................... September 29, 2009. 

74,796 ................ Eagle Cap Campers, Inc ........................................................................... La Grande, OR ............. October 29, 2009. 

75,008 ................ Weyerhaeuser NR, Choicewood Division .................................................. Titusville, PA ................ December 8, 2009. 

75,014 ................ Fairchild Semiconductor, Leased Workers from Manpower Professional South Portland, ME ...... November 9, 2010. 

75,049 ................ The Buckstaff Company, Oshkosh Industries, Inc .................................... Oshkosh, WI ................. December 28, 2009. 

75,082 ................ Simmons Manufacturing Company, LLC, Juvenile Division ...................... Neenah, WI .................. January 7, 2010. 

75,097 ................ Fraser Timber Limited, Fraser Papers, Inc ............................................... Ashland, ME ................. December 14, 2009. 

75,130 ................ FTCA, Inc., Also Known As Fleetwood Folding Trailers, Inc .................... Somerset, PA ............... January 21, 2010. 

The following certifications have been 

issued. The requirements of Section 

222(a)(2)(B) (shift in production or 

services) of the Trade Act have been 

met. 

TA–W No. Subject firm Location Impact date 

74,961 ................ Pfizer, Wyeth Pharmaceuticals, Pfizer Global, Leased Workers Westaff, 

Kelly Service.

Rouses Point, NY ......... December 2, 2010. 

74,961A ............. Pfizer, Wyeth Pharmaceuticals, Pfizer Research Division ........................ Chazy, NY .................... December 2, 2010. 

74,993 ................ Baxter Healthcare Corporation, Baxter International, Inc.; Leased Workers Aerotek and Kelly Services.Beltsville, MD ............... December 13, 2009. 

75,069 ................ Reliance Globalcom Services, Inc., Yipes Holding, Inc. ........................... Denver, CO .................. December 28, 2009. 

75,145 ................ Volvo Group North America, LLC, Volvo Information Technology, AB 

Volvo, Leased Workers Ajilon, Andreas, etc.

Greensboro, NC ........... January 27, 2010. 

75,146 ................ Berkley Surgical Company ........................................................................ Uniontown, PA ............. January 26, 2010. 

75,163 ................ Capgemini America, Inc., Capgemini NA; MIS Div.; Leased Workers Advanced Programming Group, etc.Chicago, IL ................... January 31, 2010. 

75,163A ............. Capgemini America, Inc., Capgemini NA; MIS Div.; Leased Workers Advanced Programming Group, etc.New York, NY .............. January 31, 2010. 

75,182 ................ Union Apparel, Inc ..................................................................................... Norvelt, PA ................... November 27, 2010. 

75,186 ................ Stanley Black & Decker, Customer DIY Div.; North Campus; Leased 

Workers Personnel Placements LLC, etc.

Jackson, TN ................. February 7, 2010. 

75,188 ................ Dell Services, CHPW Account, Workers Wages Reported Under Transaction Applications Group.Tulsa, OK ..................... February 7, 2010. 

75,232 ................ The Travelers Indemnity Company, Travelers Companies, Inc.; Personal 

Insurance Div.; Customer Sales and Service.

Knoxville, TN ................ February 10, 2010. 

75,234 ................ Stanley Black & Decker, Inc., CDIY Division, Leased Worker from Personnel Placements.Jackson, TN ................. February 8, 2010. 

75,293 ................ Caraustar Industries, Inc., Corporate Division, Information Technology, 

etc., Leased Workers Manpower.

Austell, GA ................... February 14, 2010. 

75,299 ................ Thomson Reuters, Business Compliance & Knowledge Solutions Div., 

Leased Workers Adecco USA.

Forth Worth, TX ........... February 14, 2010. 

The following certifications have been 

issued. The requirements of Section 

222(c) (supplier to a firm whose workers 

are certified eligible to apply for TAA) 

of the Trade Act have been met. 

TA–W No. Subject firm Location Impact date 

75,001 .................... Means Industries, Inc., Amsted Industries, Leased Workers of Kelly Services, 

Inc. 

Saginaw, MI .......... December 15, 

2009. 

75,083 .................... Chrysler LLC, Powertrain Division ....................................................................... Detroit, MI ............. January 13, 2011. 


srobinson on DSKHWCL6B1PROD with NOTICES
20048 Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 69 / Monday, April 11, 2011 / Notices 

Negative Determinations for Worker 

Adjustment Assistance 

In the following cases, the 

investigation revealed that the eligibility 

criteria for worker adjustment assistance 

have not been met for the reasons 

specified. 

The investigation revealed that the 

criteria under paragraphs(a)(2)(A) 

(increased imports) and (a)(2)(B) (shift 

in production or services to a foreign 

country) of section 222 have not been 

met. 

TA–W No. Subject firm Location Impact date 

74,819 .................... Analog Devices, Inc., Corporate Headquarters ................................................... Norwood, MA 

74,935 .................... Husqvarna Turf Care, Husqvarna A.B. ................................................................ Beatrice, NE 

74,966 .................... Jerr-Dan Corporation, An Oshkosh Corporation, Fire and Emergency Division Greencastle, PA 

75,011 .................... AJW Merchants, Inc. (AJW), TJX Companies, Leased Workers from Advanced 

Career Services.

Fall River, MA 

75,159 .................... BAE Systems, Land and Armaments, U.S. Combat Systems, Leased Workers 

of Spherion.

Lemont Furnace, 

PA 

75,248 .................... All Clad Metalcrafters, LLC, Groupe SEB, Warehouse Division ......................... Canonsburg, PA 

75,273 .................... Harsco Rail ........................................................................................................... Fairmont, MN 

Determinations Terminating 

Investigations of Petitions for Worker 

Adjustment Assistance 

After notice of the petitions was 

published in the Federal Register and on 

the Department’s Web site, as required 

by Section 221 of the Act (19 U.S.C. 

2271), the Department initiated 

investigations of these petitions. 

The following determinations 

terminating investigations were issued 

because the petitioner has requested 

that the petition be withdrawn. 

TA–W No. Subject firm Location Impact date 

75,088 .................... Rieck Mechanical ................................................................................................. Dayton, OH 

I hereby certify that the 

aforementioned determinations were 

issued during the period of March 21, 

2011 through March 25, 2011. Copies of 

these determinations may be requested 

under the Freedom of Information Act. 

Requests may be submitted by fax, 

courier services, or mail to FOIA 

Disclosure Officer, Office of Trade 

Adjustment Assistance (ETA), U.S. 

Department of Labor, 200 Constitution 

Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 20210 or 

tofoiarequest@dol.gov. These 

determinations also are available on the 

Department’s Web site at http:// 

www.doleta.gov/tradeact under the 

searchable listing of determinations. 

Dated: April 1, 2011. 

Michael W. Jaffe, 

Certifying Officer, Office of Trade Adjustment 

Assistance. 

[FR Doc. 2011–8495 Filed 4–8–11; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4510–FN–P 

DEPARTMENT OF LABOR 

Employment and Training 

Administration 

Notice of Revised Determination on 

Reconsideration 

In the matter of: TA–W–74,347; NCR 

Corporation, United States Postal Service 

Help Desk, Customer Care Center, Including 

On-Site Leased Workers of Volt Consulting; 

West Columbia, South Carolina and TA–W– 

74,347A; NCR Corporation Call Center, 

Including On-Site Leased Workers of Volt 

Consulting; West Columbia, South Carolina; 

Notice of Revised Determination on 

Reconsideration. 

On October 7, 2010, the Department 

issued an Affirmative Determination 

Regarding Application for 

Reconsideration for the workers and 

former workers of NCR Corporation, 

Customer Care Center, United States 

Postal Service Help Desk, West 

Columbia, South Carolina. The 

Department’s Notice was published in 

the Federal Register on October 25, 

2010 (75 FR 65515). 

Pursuant to 29 CFR 90.18(c), 

reconsideration may be granted under 

the following circumstances: 

(1) If it appears on the basis of facts 

not previously considered that the 

determination complained of was 

erroneous; 

(2) If it appears that the determination 

complained of was based on a mistake 

in the determination of facts not 

previously considered; or 

(3) If in the opinion of the Certifying 

Officer, a misinterpretation of facts or of 

the law justified reconsideration of the 

decision. 

The initial negative determination 

was based on the findings that the 

worker separations, or threat of 

separation, were not due to either a shift 

in the supply of support service abroad 

by NCR Corporation, Customer Care 

Center, United States Postal Service 

Help Desk, or increased imports of 

services like or directly competitive 

with those supplied at NCR 

Corporation, Customer Care Center, 

United States Postal Service Help Desk, 

West Columbia, South Carolina. The 

initial investigation also revealed that 

NCR Corporation, Customer Care 

Center, United States Postal Service 

Help Desk, West Columbia, South 

Carolina, did not supply a service to a 

firm that employed a worker group 

eligible to apply for Trade Adjustment 

Assistance (TAA). 

A careful review of previouslysubmitted information confirmed that 

workers at NCR Corporation are 

separately identifiable by service 

supplied. As such, the Department 

determines that there are two worker 

groups at the West Columbia, South 

Carolina facility: the United States 

Postal Service (USPS) Help Desk within 

the Customer Care Center (TA–W– 

74,347) and the NCR Corporation’s Call 

Center (TA–W–74,347A). 

Therefore, for purposes of the Trade 

Act of 1974, as amended, the subject 

worker group of TA–W–74,347 consists 

of workers and former workers of USPS 

Help Desk who are engaged in 

employment related to the supply of 

technical support services for the USPS. 

This worker group excludes workers not 

assigned to the Customer Care Center 

and workers within the Customer Care 

Center who are assigned to other Help 

Desks. This worker group includes onsite leased workers of Volt Consulting. 

Moreover, the subject worker group of 

TA–W–74,347A consists of workers and 

former workers of the Call Center who 


srobinson on DSKHWCL6B1PROD with NOTICES