Skip to Main Page ContentSkip to SearchSkip to Site Map NavigationSkip to Footer Links

        - Home

        - FAQ
        - Glossary
        - Facility Locator
        - What's New
        - Site Help
        - Index A-Z
        - Contact Us
        - Browse Aloud
        - Email Updates

Report a Safety Concern

      - Nuclear Reactors  - Power Reactors
- Research & Test Reactors
- Operating Reactors
- Operator Licensing
- New Reactors
- Advanced Reactors
- Operator Licensing for New Reactors
- Nuclear Reactor Quick Links
 
      - Nuclear Materials  - Special Nuclear Material
- Source Material
- Byproduct Material
- Med, Ind, & Academic Uses
- Source Materials Facilities
- Uranium Recovery
- Fuel Cycle Facilities
- Materials Transportation
- Nuclear Materials Quick Links
 
      - Radioactive Waste  - Low-Level Waste
- Waste Incidental to Reprocessing
- High-Level Waste
- Uranium Mill Tailings
- Low-Level Waste Disposal
- High-Level Waste Disposal
- Storage of Spent Nuclear Fuel
- Transporation of Spent Nuclear Fuel
- Radioactive Waste Quick Links
 
      - Nuclear Security  - Domestic Safeguards
- Information Security
- Radioactive Material Security
- Contact Us
 
      - Public Meetings & Involvement  - The NRC Approach to Open Government
- About Meetings Open to the Public
- Conferences & Symposia
- Documents for Comment
- Facilitating Stakeholder Involvement
- NRC Information Quality Guidelines
- Subscribe to E-mail Updates
- Commission Schedule
- Public Meeting Schedule
 
      - NRC Library  - Basic References
- Document Collections
- ADAMS Public Documents
- Public Document Room
- Get Copies of Documents
- FOIA & Privacy Act Requests
- Photos & Video
- Records Management 
- Withholding of Sensitive Information
- FAQ Index
- Adjudications (Hearings)
 
      - About NRC  - The Commission
- Governing Legislation
- Plans, Budget, & Performance
- Organization & Functions
- Locations
- History
- Values
- Direction-Setting & Policymaking
- Radiation Protection
- Fire Protection
- How We Regulate
- Emergency Preparedness & Response
- Public Affairs
- Congressional Affairs
- International Programs
- State & Tribal Programs
- Alternative Dispute Resolution Programs
- Employment Opportunities
- Contracting Opportunities
- Grant Opportunities
- Civil Rights
 

Print

HomeNRC LibraryDocument CollectionsGeneral CommunicationsInformation Notices1993

# 

```



                                 UNITED STATES
                         NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION
                     OFFICE OF NUCLEAR REACTOR REGULATION
                            WASHINGTON, D.C.  20555

                                 April 8, 1993


NRC INFORMATION NOTICE 93-27:  LEVEL INSTRUMENTATION INACCURACIES OBSERVED     
                               DURING NORMAL PLANT DEPRESSURIZATION


Addressees

All holders of operating licenses or construction permits for nuclear power
reactors.

Purpose

The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) is issuing this information
notice to alert addressees to inaccuracies in reactor vessel level indication
that occurred during a normal depressurization of the reactor coolant system
at the Washington Nuclear Plant Unit 2 (WNP-2) and to the fact that errors in
level indication may result in a failure to automatically isolate the residual
heat removal (RHR) system under certain conditions.  It is expected that
recipients will review the information for applicability to their facilities
and consider actions, as appropriate, to avoid similar problems.  However,
suggestions contained in this information notice are not NRC requirements;
therefore, no specific action or written response is required.  

Background

As discussed in NRC Information Notice 92-54, "Level Instrumentation
Inaccuracies Caused by Rapid Depressurization," and Generic Letter 92-04,
"Resolution of the Issues Related to Reactor Vessel Water Level
Instrumentation in BWRs Pursuant to 10 CFR 50.54(f)," noncondensible gas may
become dissolved in the reference leg of water level instrumentation and lead
to false indications of high level after a rapid depressurization event. 
Reactor vessel level indication signals are important because these signals
are used for actuating automatic safety systems and for guidance to operators
during and after an event.  While Information Notice 92-54 dealt with
potential consequences of rapid system depressurization, this information
notice discusses level indication errors that may occur during normal plant
cooldown and depressurization.

Description of Circumstances

On January 21, 1993, during a plant cooldown following a reactor scram at 
WNP-2, "notching" of the level indication was observed on at least two of four
channels of the reactor vessel narrow range level instrumentation.  "Notching"
is a momentary increase in indicated water level.  This increase occurs when a
gas bubble moves through a vertical portion of the reference leg and causes a
temporary decrease in the static head in the reference leg.  The notching at 


9304020319.

                                                            IN 93-27
                                                            April 8, 1993
                                                            Page 2 of 3


WNP-2 was first observed on channel "C" at a pressure of approximately 
827 kPa [120 psig].  Channel "B" experienced notching starting at
approximately 350 kPa [50 psig].  At these pressures, the level error was on
the order of 10 to 18 centimeters [4 to 7 inches] and persisted for
approximately one minute.  

Beginning at a pressure of approximately 240 kPa [35 psig], the level
indication from channel "C" became erratic and, as the plant continued to
depressurize, an 81-centimeter [32-inch] level indication error occurred. 
This depressurization was coincident with the initiation of the shutdown
cooling system.  The 81-centimeter [32-inch] level error was sustained and was
gradually recovered over a period of two hours.  The licensee postulated that
this large error in level indication was caused by gas released in the
reference leg displacing approximately 40 percent of the water volume.  The
licensee also postulated that the slow recovery of correct level indication
was a result of the time needed for steam to condense in the condensate
chamber and refill the reference leg.  The licensee inspected the "C"
reference leg and discovered leakage through reference leg fittings.  This
leakage may have been a contributing factor for an increased accumulation of
dissolved noncondensible gas in that reference leg.

The licensee determined that the type of errors observed in level indication
during this event could result in a failure to automatically isolate a leak in
the RHR system during shutdown cooling.  The design basis for WNP-2 includes a
postulated leak in the RHR system piping outside containment while the plant
is in the shutdown cooling mode.  For this event, the shutdown cooling suction
valves are assumed to automatically isolate on a low reactor vessel water
level signal to mitigate the consequences of the event.  For the January 21,
1993 plant cooldown, the licensee concluded that, with the observed errors in
level indication, the shutdown cooling suction valves may not have
automatically isolated the RHR system on low reactor vessel water level as
designed.  The licensee has implemented compensatory measures for future plant
cooldowns to ensure that a leak that occurs in the RHR system during shutdown
cooling operation would be isolated promptly.  These measures include touring
the associated RHR pump room hourly during shutdown cooling and backfilling
the water level instrument reference legs after entry into mode 3 (hot
shutdown).  The licensee is also evaluating measures to minimize leakage from
the "C" reference leg.     
 
Discussion

The event described above is different than events previously reported because
of the large magnitude and sustained duration (as opposed to momentary
notching) of the level error that occurred during normal plant cooldown.  A
large sustained level error is of concern because of the potential for
complicating long-term operator actions.  In addition, the scenario of a
postulated leak in the RHR system evaluated by WNP-2 suggests that some safety
systems may not automatically actuate should an event occur while the reactor
is in a reduced pressure condition.  Generic Letter 92-04 requested, in part,
that licensees determine the impact of potential level indication errors on.

                                                            IN 93-27
                                                            April 8, 1993
                                                            Page 3 of 3 


automatic safety system response during licensing basis transients and
accidents.  The information in this notice indicates that sustained level
instrument inaccuracies can occur during a normal reactor depressurization. 
Therefore, events occurring during low pressure conditions may also be
complicated by level indication errors.  

This information notice requires no specific action or written response.  If
you have any questions about the information in this notice, please contact
the technical contact listed below or the appropriate Office of Nuclear
Reactor Regulation (NRR) project manager.
                                      

                                       ORIGINAL SIGNED BY

                                   Brian K. Grimes, Director
                                   Division of Operational Events Assessment
                                   Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation

Technical contact:  Amy Cubbage, NRR
                                                  (301) 504-2875

Attachment:  
List of Recently Issued NRC Information Notices

.
```

*Page Last Reviewed/Updated Wednesday, February 16, 2011*

#### Home

            - News Releases
            - Event Reports
            - ADAMS
            - Open Gov
            - Students & Teachers
            - Photos & Video

#### About Us

            - Strategic Plan
            - Budget & Performance
            - Perf & Accountability Rept
            - History of the NRC
            - Employment
            - NRC Ethics
            - Agency Status
            - Contact Us

#### Popular Documents

            - Info Digest
            - Factsheets & Brochures
            - Forms
            - Electronic Submittals
            - NRC Reports – NUREG
            - NRC Regulations – 10-CFR
            - Inspection Reports
            - Plain Writing
            - Enforcement Actions

#### Stay Connected

            - Blog
            - Flickr
            - Twitter
            - YouTube
            - RSS

Regulations.govUSA.govRecoveryFOIANo Fear EEOInspector GeneralSite MapAccessibilityPrivacy PolicySite DisclaimerFor Employees