alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
###### Editorial Note on Part 41

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 41 (formerly part 275) appear at T.D. ATF-460, 66 FR 39093, July 27, 2001.

#### § 41.25 Disposal of forfeited, condemned, and abandoned tobacco products and cigarette papers and tubes.

When any Federal, State, or local officer having custody of forfeited, condemned, or abandoned tobacco products or cigarette papers or tubes, upon which the Federal tax has not been paid, is of the opinion that the sale thereof will not bring a price equal to the tax due and payable thereon, and the expenses incident to the sale thereof, he shall not sell, nor cause to be sold, such articles for consumption in the United States. Where the articles are not sold, the officer may deliver them to a Federal or State hospital or institution (if they are fit for consumption) or cause their destruction by burning completely or by rendering them unfit for consumption. Where such articles are sold, they shall not be released by the officer having custody thereof until they are properly packaged and taxpaid, which tax shall be considered as a portion of the sales price. Except when the tax is to be paid to the Port Director of Customs or other authorized customs officer in accordance with customs regulations (19 CFR part 127) on sales of articles by customs officers, the payment of tax on those articles must be evidenced by presentation, to the officer having custody of the articles, of a receipt from the appropriate TTB officer showing such payment. In the case of such articles held by or for the Federal Government, the sale thereof shall be subject to the applicable provisions of the Regulations of the General Services Administration, Title 1, Personal Property Management.

(68A Stat. 872, 903; 26 U.S.C. 7342, 7606)

[T.D. 6871, 31 FR 40, Jan. 4, 1966. Redesignated at 40 FR 16835, Apr. 15, 1975, and amended by T.D. ATF-232, 51 FR 28084, Aug. 5, 1986; T.D. ATF-243, 51 FR 43194, Dec. 1, 1986; T.D. ATF-422, 64 FR 71948, Dec. 22, 1999. Redesignated and amended by T.D. TTB-16, 69 FR 52424, Aug. 26, 2004; 78 FR 38568, June 27, 2013]
Exhibit 3.4
 CERTIFICATE OF FORMATION
 OF
 MEMORIAL PRODUCTION PARTNERS GP LLC
 LLC
 FIRST.
 SECOND.
 THIRD.
 IN WITNESS WHEREOF,
 /s/ Lorena NicholsLorena NicholsAuthorized Person
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of State

          - [Public Notice: 7413]

# SUMMARY:

                        Notice is hereby given of the following determinations: Pursuant to the authority vested in me by the Act of October 19, 1965 (79 Stat. 985; 22 U.S.C. 2459), Executive Order 12047 of March 27, 1978, the Foreign Affairs Reform and Restructuring Act of 1998 (112 Stat. 2681,                         *et seq.;*22 U.S.C. 6501 note,                         *et seq.*), Delegation of Authority No. 234 of October 1, 1999, and Delegation of Authority No. 236-3 of August 28, 2000, I hereby determine that the objects to be included in the exhibition “Ancestors of the Lake: Art from Lake Sentani and Humboldt Bay,” imported from abroad for temporary exhibition within the United States, are of cultural significance. The objects are imported pursuant to loan agreements with the foreign owners or custodians. I also determine that the exhibition or display of the exhibit objects at The Menil Collection, Houston, Texas, from on or about May 6, 2011, until on or about August 28, 2011, and at possible additional exhibitions or venues yet to be determined, is in the national interest. I have ordered that Public Notice of these Determinations be published in the                         **Federal Register**                        .                    

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

For further information, including a list of the exhibit objects, contact Paul W. Manning, Attorney-Adviser, Office of the Legal Adviser, U.S. Department of State (telephone: 202-632-6469). The mailing address is U.S. Department of State, SA-5, L/PD, Fifth Floor (Suite 5H03), Washington, DC 20522-0505.

Dated: April 6, 2011.

Ann Stock,

Assistant Secretary, Bureau of Educational and Cultural Affairs, Department of State.

[FR Doc. 2011-8904 Filed 4-12-11; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4710-05-P
### Part T—Centers of Excellence for Veteran Student Success
**Exhibit 24.5**

**POWEROF ATTORNEY**

KNOW ALL MEN BYTHESE PRESENTS:

Thatthe undersigned hereby irrevocably constitutes and appoints **Rhys J. Best, Charles J. Keszler and Robert F. Spears**, orany of them, as the true and lawful agents and attorneys-in-fact of theundersigned (the “Attorneys-in-Fact”), each with full power to appoint asubstitute or substitutes to act hereunder, to execute and deliver for and onbehalf of the undersigned the Annual Report of Lone Star Technologies, Inc. onForm 10-K (including any amendments thereto) to be filed with the Securitiesand Exchange Commission pursuant to the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 for thefiscal year ended December 31, 2006.  Theundersigned hereby ratifies and confirms all that the Attorneys-in-Fact, or anysubstitute or substitutes, may do by virtue of this Power of Attorney.

INWITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has executed this Power of Attorney at Dallas,Texas on this 27th day of February, 2007.
|        |   | /s/ M. Joseph McHugh |
|--------|--------|----------------------|
|   |   | M. Joseph McHugh     |

 

 

 
| STATE OF TEXAS   |   | § |
|------------------|--------|--------|
|             |   | § |
| COUNTY OF DALLAS |   | § |

 

BEFOREME, Connie L. Monk, a Notary Public in and for the State of Texas, on this daydid personally appear M. Joseph McHugh known to me to be the person whose nameis subscribed to the foregoing Power of Attorney, and acknowledged to me thathe executed such Power of Attorney for the purposes and consideration thereinexpressed.

GIVENUNDER MY HAND AND SEAL OF OFFICE, this 27th day of February, 2007.
|        |   | /s/ Connie L. Monk            |
|--------|--------|-------------------------------|
|   |   | Notary Public, State of Texas |

 

My CommissionExpires:  7/26/08

----
§ 24.77 Experimental wine. ( a ) *General.* Any scientific university, college of learning, or institution of scientific research may, without payment of tax, produce, receive, blend, treat, and store wine for experimental or research use, but not for consumption (other than organoleptic tests) or sale, and may receive wine spirits without payment of tax in quantities as may be necessary for the production of wine.
( b ) *Qualification.* An institution that wants to conduct experimental wine operations must apply in letter form to the appropriate TTB officer. The application will show the name and address of the institution, the nature, extent, and purpose of the operations to be conducted, describe the operations and equipment and the location at which operations will be conducted (including identification of the building or buildings, or portions thereof, to be used), and the security measures to be provided. If wine spirits are to be used, that fact will be stated together with the estimated annual requirements in proof gallons. A secure place of storage under lock will be provided for such spirits and will be described in the application. The applicant must, when required by the appropriate TTB officer, furnish as part of the application, additional information that may be necessary to determine whether the application should be approved. Operations may not begin until authorized by the appropriate TTB officer.
( c ) *Procurement of spirits.* Where the approved application provides for the use of wine spirits in experimental wine operations, such spirits may be procured to the extent stated in the approved qualifying application. However, an application will be filed with the appropriate TTB officer and authorization obtained for each wine spirits procurement.
( d ) *Records.* All approved qualifying documents and applications will be retained in the files of the institution and will be exhibited on request to appropriate TTB officers. No reports concerning wine or wine spirits need be filed unless required by appropriate TTB officer, but records appropriate to the experiments to be conducted and records documenting the disposition of the wine and wine spirits will be retained and will be made available for inspection by appropriate TTB officers. If wine spirits are used, the records will show the quantities of spirits received and used each day.
( e ) *Discontinuance.* When an institution discontinues experimental wine operations, all remaining wine or wine spirits will be disposed of either by destruction or shipment to premises authorized to receive wine or wine spirits. A letter application will be filed with the appropriate TTB officer and authorization obtained prior to the destruction or shipment of the wine or wine spirits. When the authorized destruction or shipment has been completed, a letter notification will be sent to the appropriate TTB officer.
(Sec. 201, Pub. L. 85-859, 72 Stat. 1331, as amended (26 U.S.C. 5042))
(Approved by the Office of Management and Budget under control numbers 1512-0292 and 1512-0298) [T.D. ATF-299, 55 FR 24989, June 19, 1990, as amended by T.D. ATF-409, 64 FR 13683, 13684, Mar. 22, 1999]
#### § 24.197 Production by fermentation.

In producing special natural wine by fermentation, flavoring materials may be added before or during fermentation. Special natural wine produced by fermentation may be ameliorated in the same manner and to the same extent as natural wine made from the same fruit. Spirits may not be added to special natural wine with the exception of spirits contained in the natural wine used as a base or in authorized essences made on bonded wine premises as provided in § 24.86 or in approved essences made elsewhere. Upon removal of the wine from fermenters, the volume of liquid will be determined accurately and recorded as wine produced. The quantity of liquid in fermenters at the close of each reporting period will be reported on the TTB F 5120.17, Report of Bonded Wine Premises Operations.

(Sec. 201, Pub. L. 85-859, 72 Stat. 1386, as amended (26 U.S.C. 5386))

(Approved by the Office of Management and Budget under control numbers 1512-0216 and 1512-0298)

[T.D. ATF-299, 55 FR 24989, June 19, 1990, as amended by ATF-338, 58 FR 19064, Apr. 12, 1993]
###### Editorial Note on Part 46

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 46 appear by T.D. ATF-457, 66 FR 32220, 32221, June 14, 2001.

#### § 46.273 Refusing entry or examination.

If the dealer or another person in charge of the premises refuses to admit any appropriate TTB officer or prevents any appropriate TTB officer from examining the records or articles, the dealer may be liable for the penalties described in 26 U.S.C. 7342 or 7212.
### subpart 3—local targeted assistance programs
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY ELEV

 1,900.60

 1,900.51

 1,901.43

 1,901.09

 1,901.46

 1,900.79

 1,900.44

 1,900.61

 1,900.80

 1,900.97

 1,901.36

 1,900.47

 1,900.41

 1,900.58

 1,900.75

 1,901.75

 1,900.91

 1,900.49

 1,900.32

 1,900.53

 1,900.77

 1,900.73

 1,900.40

 1,900.30

 1,900.51

 1,900.51

 1,900.45

 1,900.34

 1,900.42

 1,900.55

 1,901.01

 13,617

 13,550

 14,233

 13,978

 14,255

 13,756

 13,499

 13,624

 13,764

 13,889

 14,180

 13,521

 13,477

 13,602

 13,727

 14,472

 13,845

 13,536

 13,411

 13,565

 13,742

 13,712

 13,469

 13,396

 13,550

 13,550

 13,506

 13,425

 13,484

 13,580

 13,918

STORAGE

-73

-67

+683

-255

+277

-499

-257

+125

+140

+125

+291

-659

-44

+125

+125

+745

-627

-309

-125

+154

+177

-30

-243

-73

+154

+0

-44

-81

+59

+96

+338

CHANGE

1,990

2,077

2,149

1,872

2,060

1,870

2,060

2,157

2,177

2,000

1,988

1,901

2,045

2,007

2,083

2,123

2,615

3,186

2,727

2,307

2,346

2,642

2,618

2,678

2,717

2,722

2,686

2,701

2,707

2,726

2,780

INFLOW

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

POWER

 310

 310

 310

 312

 312

 311

 309

 309

 307

 312

 310

 311

 309

 309

 312

 433

 1,341

 1,489

 1,150

 545

 518

 1,004

 1,004

 1,002

 1,001

 1,007

 1,004

 1,006

 1,004

 1,007

 996

SPILL

 150

 150

 150

 150

 150

 150

 150

 150

 150

 150

 150

 150

 150

 150

 150

 150

 150

 150

 150

 150

 150

 150

 150

 150

 150

 150

 150

 150

 150

 150

 150

OUTLETS

 6

 8

 4

 7

 5

 4

 5

 5

 4

 3

 4

 5

 7

 6

 4

 5

 6

 5

 3

 2

 2

 5

 7

 6

 8

 7

 6

 6

 6

 8

 5

C.F.S.

 .29

 .36

 .16

 .30

 .23

 .20

 .23

 .21

 .18

 .14

 .16

 .23

 .32

 .29

 .18

 .22

 .28

 .24

 .23

 .11

 .17

 .22

 .33

 .28

 .36

 .32

 .27

 .27

 .19

 .38

 .22

INCHES

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

AUGUST 2015 LEWISTON LAKE DAILY OPERATIONS RUN DATE: March 18, 2016

IN LAKE

EVAPORATION

C.F.S. FRANCIS CARR

COMPUTED*

ACRE-FEET

RELEASE - C.F.S. 

TOTALS +228 72,717 0 4,650 20,164 164 7.57

ACRE-FEET +228 144,234 0 9,223 39,995 325

* COMPUTED INFLOW IS THE SUM OF CHANGE IN STORAGE, RELEASES AND EVAPORATION.

(1) OUTLET RELEASE INCLUDES FISH RELEASE.

(2) INCHES OF EVAPORATION TAKEN FROM PAN AT TRINITY RIVER HATCHERY.

SUMMARY

RELEASE (ACRE-FEET)

TOTAL POWER 0

TOTAL RIVER 49,218 143,682

 13,690

 94,464

RIVER

JUDGE FRANCIS CARR POWERPLANT

TOTAL RELEASE

JUDGE (2)

(1) POWERPLANT

 1,561

 1,643

 1,341

 1,532

 1,453

 1,657

 1,726

 1,630

 1,645

 1,472

 1,377

 1,767

 1,601

 1,479

 1,554

 1,159

 1,434

 1,698

 1,487

 1,532

 1,587

 1,498

 1,580

 1,557

 1,480

 1,558

 1,548

 1,580

 1,517

 1,513

 1,459

 47,625

 94,464

Table 6
1 Local Rule 47.5 provides: "The publication of opinions

that have no precedential value and merely decide particular cases on the basis of well-settled principles of law imposes needless expense on the public and burdens on the legal profession." Pursuant to that Rule, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published. UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS for the Fifth Circuit

_____________________________________

No. 95-60013 Summary Calendar

_____________________________________ UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee,

VERSUS
KELVIN HOWARD DUNSON, Defendant-Appellant.

______________________________________________________ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Mississippi

(94-CR-71)

______________________________________________________ (September 25, 1995) Before DAVIS, BARKSDALE and DeMOSS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: 1
After the district court imposed sentence in this case, this

court rendered a decision in United States v. Hernandez , No. 94-
60586, 1995 WL 509345 (5th Cir., Aug. 29, 1995), interpreting §
5G1.3, U.S.S.G. Because the district court did not have the
benefit of this decision when it considered how its sentence should
relate to Dunson's state sentence, we vacate the district court's sentence and remand for resentencing in light of Hernandez

. VACATED and REMANDED.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

DAY HIGH

 2,589

 2,860

 3,057

 3,417

 3,678

 4,022

 4,546

 4,430

 4,429

 4,249

 3,547

 3,232

 2,824

 2,578

 2,182

 2,081

 2,189

 2,110

 2,306

 2,440

 2,507

 2,050

 2,101

 1,948

 1,895

 1,888

 1,779

 1,741

 1,931

 2,089

 1,058

 1,105

 1,148

 1,169

 1,246

 1,280

 1,300

 1,293

 1,249

 1,180

 1,093

 1,159

 1,009

 993

 864

 958

 932

 807

 734

 724

 816

 798

 764

 789

 808

 800

 787

 795

 798

 816

 1,577

 1,622

 1,654

 1,753

 1,886

 2,017

 2,215

 2,317

 2,401

 2,163

 1,918

 1,793

 1,615

 1,477

 1,355

 1,340

 1,312

 1,208

 1,212

 1,227

 1,239

 1,140

 1,095

 1,074

 1,101

 1,084

 1,074

 1,084

 1,133

 1,122

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

SEPTEMBER 2008 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: October 10, 2008

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

14 DAY

ACCUM

MEAN

14 DAY 

AVG

MEAN

 21,682

 22,034

 22,437

 22,922

 23,521

 24,116

 24,786

 25,471

 26,202

 26,729

 26,965

 27,050

 26,781

 26,408

 26,186

 25,904

 25,562

 25,017

 24,343

 23,553

 22,577

 21,400

 20,094

 19,005

 18,188

 17,479

 16,938

 16,545

 16,323

 16,105

 1,549

 1,574

 1,603

 1,637

 1,680

 1,723

 1,770

 1,819

 1,872

 1,909

 1,926

 1,932

 1,913

 1,886

 1,870

 1,850

 1,826

 1,787

 1,739

 1,682

 1,613

 1,529

 1,435

 1,358

 1,299

 1,249

 1,210

 1,182

 1,166

 1,150

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

JERSEY POINT TOP ON THE SAN JOAQUIN RIVER
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion

should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited

circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 06-11021

Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

Plaintiff-Appellee

v.

MARK MATA

Defendant-Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Northern District of Texas

USDC No. 3:05-CR-075-20

Before JOLLY, DENNIS, and PRADO, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Mark Mata appeals the 168-month prison sentence imposed following his

of conviction of one count of conspiracy to distribute cocaine, marijuana, and

methamphetamine. Mata contends that the district court infringed his Sixth

Amendment rights and erred by sentencing him based on its own factual

findings. Mata also challenges the presumption of reasonableness that attaches

to a within-guidelines sentence. These arguments are foreclosed. See Rita v.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

F I L E D

October 2, 2007

Charles R. Fulbruge III

Clerk
No. 06-11021

2

United States, 127 S. Ct. 2456, 2462 (2007); United States v. Alonzo, 435 F.3d

551, 553 (5th Cir. 2006); United States v. Mares, 402 F.3d 511, 519 (5th Cir.

2005). 

Mata argues that his sentence is unreasonable because the district court

did not give sufficient weight to certain sentencing factors. Mata has failed to

show error in connection with his sentence, which was the result of a downward

departure imposed in accordance with the Sentencing Guidelines. See United

States v. Smith, 440 F.3d 704, 706-07 (5th Cir. 2006).

Mata has shown no error in connection with the district court’s judgment.

Consequently, that judgment is AFFIRMED. The Government’s motion for

summary affirmance, dismissal of the appeal, or an extension of time to file a

brief is DENIED.
Exhibit 31.2I, Richard W. Hudson, Chief Financial Officer, certify that: 1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Healthcare Services Group, Inc.;  2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a materialfact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light ofthe circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to theperiods covered by this report;  3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial informationincluded in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition,results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periodspresented in this report;  4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures ( as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e)and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting ( as defined in Exchange ActRules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and have; a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused suchdisclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensurethat material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidatedsubsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularlyduring the period in which this report is being prepared;  b) designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused suchinternal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, toprovide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting andthe preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance withgenerally accepted accounting principles;  c) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls andprocedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness ofthe disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by thisreport based on such evaluation; and  d) disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internalcontrol over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recentfiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materiallyaffect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and 5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our mostrecent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’sauditors and the audit committee of registrant’s Board of Directors. a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design oroperation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likelyto adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize andreport financial information; and  b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or otheremployees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting.        Date:  April 23, 2007 /s/ Richard W. Hudson   Richard W. Hudson   Chief Financial Officer  
-33-