alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 67 (Thursday, April 7, 2011)]
[Notices]
[Page 19352]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2011-8255]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket No. ER11-3215-000]


Monterey CA, LLC; Supplemental Notice That Initial Market-Based 
Rate Filing Includes Request for Blanket Section 204 Authorization

    This is a supplemental notice in the above-referenced proceeding of 
Monterey CA, LLC's application for market-based rate authority, with an 
accompanying rate tariff, noting that such application includes a 
request for blanket authorization, under 18 CFR part 34, of future 
issuances of securities and assumptions of liability.
    Any person desiring to intervene or to protest should file with the 
Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE., 
Washington, DC 20426, in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the 
Commission's Rules of Practice and Procedure (18 CFR 385.211 and 
385.214). Anyone filing a motion to intervene or protest must serve a 
copy of that document on the Applicant.
    Notice is hereby given that the deadline for filing protests with 
regard to the applicant's request for blanket authorization, under 18 
CFR part 34, of future issuances of securities and assumptions of 
liability, is April 19, 2011.
    The Commission encourages electronic submission of protests and 
interventions in lieu of paper, using the FERC Online links at http://www.ferc.gov. To facilitate electronic service, persons with Internet 
access who will eFile a document and/or be listed as a contact for an 
intervenor must create and validate an eRegistration account using the 
eRegistration link. Select the eFiling link to log on and submit the 
intervention or protests.
    Persons unable to file electronically should submit an original and 
14 copies of the intervention or protest to the Federal Energy 
Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE., Washington, DC 20426.
    The filings in the above-referenced proceeding are accessible in 
the Commission's eLibrary system by clicking on the appropriate link in 
the above list. They are also available for review in the Commission's 
Public Reference Room in Washington, DC. There is an eSubscription link 
on the Web site that enables subscribers to receive e-mail notification 
when a document is added to a subscribed docket(s). For assistance with 
any FERC Online service, please e-mail <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#abedeef9e8e4c5c7c2c5cef8dedbdbc4d9dfebcdced9c885ccc4dd"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="0a4c4f584945646663646f597f7a7a65787e4a6c6f7869246d657c">[email protected]</span></a> or 
call (866) 208-3676 (toll free). For TTY, call (202) 502-8659.

    Dated: March 30, 2011.
Nathaniel J. Davis, Sr.,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2011-8255 Filed 4-6-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY ELEV

 123.37

 123.52

 123.53

 123.53

 123.10

 123.53

 123.40

 123.01

 123.56

 123.13

 123.37

 123.67

 122.74

 123.50

 123.60

 123.46

 123.49

 123.60

 124.14

 124.02

 123.97

 123.55

 123.51

 123.83

 123.81

 123.80

 123.64

 123.46

 123.56

 123.34

 123.19

 7,965

 8,035

 8,040

 8,040

 7,838

 8,040

 7,979

 7,796

 8,054

 7,852

 7,965

 8,106

 7,674

 8,026

 8,073

 8,007

 8,021

 8,073

 8,331

 8,271

 8,247

 8,050

 8,031

 8,181

 8,172

 8,167

 8,092

 8,007

 8,054

 7,951

 7,880

STORAGE

+66

+70

+5

+0

-202

+202

-61

-183

+258

-202

+113

+141

-432

+352

+47

-66

+14

+52

+258

-60

-24

-197

-19

+150

-9

-5

-75

-85

+47

-103

-71

CHANGE

1,208

1,216

1,213

1,253

1,153

1,361

1,232

1,135

1,357

1,144

1,265

1,288

1,357

1,907

1,765

1,712

1,749

1,772

1,857

1,475

1,267

1,176

1,281

1,319

1,213

1,202

1,175

1,530

1,761

1,680

1,706

INFLOW

 1,107

 1,114

 1,144

 1,185

 1,187

 1,187

 1,176

 1,139

 1,139

 1,158

 1,164

 1,177

 1,523

 1,678

 1,683

 1,682

 1,682

 1,680

 1,655

 1,431

 1,205

 1,200

 1,202

 1,161

 1,144

 1,135

 1,151

 1,514

 1,678

 1,677

 1,679

POWER

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

SPILL

 64

 64

 64

 64

 64

 64

 64

 64

 64

 64

 31

 38

 50

 50

 50

 50

 50

 50

 50

 50

 50

 46

 45

 45

 45

 45

 45

 45

 45

 45

 45

HATCHERY

 4

 3

 2

 4

 4

 4

 3

 4

 4

 4

 3

 2

 2

 2

 3

 3

 0

 0

 1

 3

 3

 4

 4

 3

 4

 5

 4

 4

 4

 0

 2

C.F.S.

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

MAY 2020 LAKE NATOMA DAILY OPERATIONS RUN DATE: June 1, 2020

IN LAKE

EVAP

C.F.S.

COMPUTED*

ACRE-FEET

RELEASE - C.F.S.

TOTALS -19 43,729 41,637 0 1,610 92

ACRE-FEET -19 86,736 82,587 0 3,193 182

COMMENTS:

* COMPUTED INFLOW IS THE SUM OF CHANGE IN STORAGE, RELEASES AND EVAPORATION.

SUMMARY

RELEASES (ACRE-FEET)

POWER 82,587

SPILL 0

FOLSOM SOUTH CANAL

HATCHERY

 795

 3,193

 7,899

FOLSOM

SOUTH 

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 4

 20

 20

 20

 20

 10

 0

 0

 0

 5

 10

 10

 16

 21

 21

 21

 25

 40

 34

 25

 20

 13

 10

 10

 10

 16

 401

 795

(1)

(1) INCHES OF EVAPORATION TAKEN FROM FOLSOM PAN.

RELEASES (ACRE-FEET) 

TOTAL 86,575
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from National
Housing Partnership Realty Fund I 1999 First Quarter 10-QSB and is qualified in
its entirety by reference to such 10-QSB filing.
</LEGEND>
<CIK> 0000731131
<NAME> NATIONAL HOUSING PARTNERSHIP REALTY FUND I
<MULTIPLIER> 1
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1999
<CASH>                                               0
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0<F1>
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,804,910
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0<F1>
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                     783,856
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 1,804,910
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               (8,321)
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                39,648
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 233
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                      0
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (47,969)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (4.00)<F2>
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
<FN>
<F1>Registrant has an unclassified balance sheet.
<F2>Multiplier is 1.
</FN>
        

</TABLE>
I 

116TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 5600 

To amend the Worker Adjustment and Retraining Notification Act to provide 

a notice requirement regarding offshoring. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JANUARY 14, 2020 

Mrs. AXNE introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee 

on Education and Labor 

A BILL 

To amend the Worker Adjustment and Retraining Notification Act to provide a notice requirement regarding 

offshoring. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Offshoring Notification 

5 Act’’. 

6 SEC. 2. DEFINITION. 

7 Section 2(a) of the Worker Adjustment and Retrain8 ing Notification Act (29 U.S.C. 2101) is amended— 

9 (1) in paragraph (7), by striking ‘‘and’’ at the 

10 end; 


pamtmann on DSKBC07HB2PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 5600 IH

1 (2) in paragraph (8), by striking the period and 

2 inserting ‘‘; and’’; and 

3 (3) by adding at the end the following: 

4 ‘‘(9) the term ‘United States’ includes each of 

5 the 50 States, the District of Columbia, the Republic 

6 of the Marshall Islands, the Federated States of Mi7 cronesia, and the Republic of Palau, and each terri8 tory or possession of the United States.’’. 

9 SEC. 3. NOTICE. 

10 Section 3 of the Worker Adjustment and Retraining 

11 Notification Act (29 U.S.C. 2102(a)) is amended— 

12 (1) by redesignating subsections (b), (c), and 

13 (d) as subsections (c), (d), and (e), respectively; and 

14 (2) by inserting after subsection (a) the fol15 lowing: 

16 ‘‘(b) OFFSHORING INFORMATION.—The notice shall 

17 contain information stating— 

18 ‘‘(1) whether the employer plans to continue 

19 producing the good or providing the service that the 

20 affected employees have been producing or pro21 viding; and 

22 ‘‘(2) if so, whether the production or provision 

23 will be performed for the employer, by employees or 

24 contractors outside the United States.’’. 

Æ 


pamtmann on DSKBC07HB2PROD with BILLS
**SWISS ARMY BRANDS, INC.**

CERTIFICATION

In connection with the periodic report of Swiss Army Brands, Inc. (the"Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2002 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the "Report"), I,**Thomas M. Lupinski, Chief Financial Officer** of the Company, hereby certify as of the date hereof, solely for purposes ofTitle 18, Chapter 63, Section 1350 of the United States Code, that to the best of my knowledge:

- the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), asapplicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and
- the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all materialrespects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company at the dates and for the periods indicated.

This Certification has not been, and shall not be deemed, "filed" with theSecurities and Exchange Commission.

Date:  August 14, 2002
EXHIBIT32

 

CERTIFICATIONPURSUANT TO

18U.S.C. SECTION1350,

ASADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

 

Inconnection with the Quarterly Report of Rub Investments Limited (the"Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ended March 31, 2004, asfiled with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the"Report"), I, Anthony N. DeMint, President and Chief AccountingOfficer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adoptedpursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

-  The    Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the    Securities Exchange Act of 1934; andThe    information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material    respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

/s/Anthony N.DeMint                       

AnthonyN. DeMint

Presidentand Chief Accounting Officer

May 13,2004
In the

Court of Appeals

Second Appellate District of Texas

at Fort Worth ___________________________

No. 02-22-00301-CV

___________________________

On Appeal from the County Court at Law

Hood County, Texas

Trial Court No. C08061

Before Kerr, Birdwell, and Wallach, JJ.

Memorandum Opinion by Justice Kerr

BRIAN MATTHEW CRABBE, Appellant

V. 

BRITTNY MICHELLE SANDERS, Appellee
2 

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND JUDGMENT

We have considered Appellant’s “Unopposed Motion to Set Aside the Trial 

Court’s Judgment, Remand the Case to the Trial Court for Rendition of Judgment, 

and Dismiss the Appeal.” In this unopposed motion, Appellant represents that the 

parties have reached an agreement to settle the case. As part of that agreement,1

Appellant asks us to set aside the trial court’s judgment without regard to the merits, 

to remand the case to the trial court for rendition of judgment in accordance with the 

parties’ settlement agreement, and to dismiss the appeal. Based on Appellant’s 

unopposed representation of the parties’ settlement agreement, we grant the motion

as to Appellant’s request that we set aside the trial court’s judgment and remand the 

case to the trial court. See Robertson v. Robertson, No. 02-21-00387-CV, 

2022 WL 1183339, at *1 (Tex. App.—Fort Worth Apr. 21, 2022, no pet.) (per curiam) 

(mem. op.); see also Tex. R. App. P. 42.1(a)(2)(B). We deny the rest of the motion. See 

Lone Tree Res. & Consulting, Inc. v. Persepolis, Inc., No. 02-21-00246-CV, 

2021 WL 6143641, at *1 (Tex. App.—Fort Worth Dec. 30, 2021, no pet.) (per curiam) 

(mem. op.) (“Because we cannot both set aside the trial court’s judgment and dismiss 

the appeal, we deny the motion as to the parties’ request that we dismiss the appeal.”); 

see also Tex. R. App. P. 43.2(d), (f). 

1

Neither party has filed a copy of the parties’ settlement agreement with this 

court. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.1(a)(2).
3 

Accordingly, we set aside the trial court’s September 2, 2022 Amended Final 

Judgment without regard to the merits and remand this case to the trial court to 

render judgment in accordance with the parties’ agreement. See Tex. R. App. P. 

42.1(a)(2)(B). Each party must bear its own appellate costs. See Tex. R. App. P. 

42.1(d), 43.4.

/s/ Elizabeth Kerr

Elizabeth Kerr

Justice

Delivered: August 31, 2023
[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 70 (Tuesday, April 12, 2011)]
[Notices]
[Page 20310]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2011-8672]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE

Forest Service


Ketchikan Resource Advisory Committee

AGENCY: Forest Service, USDA.

ACTION: Notice of meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Ketchikan Resource Advisory Committee will meet in 
Ketchikan, Alaska, June 28, 2011. The purpose of this meeting is to 
discuss potential projects under the Secure Rural Schools and Community 
Self-Determination Act of 2008.

DATES: The meeting will be held at the Ketchikan-Misty Fiords Ranger 
District, 3031 Tongass Avenue, Ketchikan, Alaska. Send written comments 
to Ketchikan Resource Advisory Committee, c/o District Ranger, USDA 
Forest Service, 3031 Tongass Ave., Ketchikan, AK 99901, or 
electronically to Diane Daniels, RAC Coordinator at <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#e6828287888f838a95a68095c8808382c89395"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="4d29292c232428213e0d2b3e632b282963383e">[email protected]</span></a>.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Diane Daniels, RAC Coordinator 
Ketchikan-Misty Fiords Ranger District, Tongass National Forest, (907) 
228-4105.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The meeting is open to the public. Committee 
discussion is limited to Forest Service staff and Committee members. 
However, public input opportunity will be provided and individuals will 
have the opportunity to address the Committee at that time.

    Dated: April 4, 2011.
Jeff DeFreest,
District Ranger.
[FR Doc. 2011-8672 Filed 4-11-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410-11-M


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
### §2398. Limitation on Federal regulations

The Secretary may issue regulations under this chapter only to the extent necessary to administer and ensure compliance with the specific requirements of this chapter.

(Pub. L. 88–210, title II, §218, formerly title III, §318, as added Pub. L. 109–270, §1(b), Aug. 12, 2006, 120 Stat. 744; renumbered title II, §218, Pub. L. 115–224, title II, §201(a)(5), (6), July 31, 2018, 132 Stat. 1621.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Prior Provisions

A prior section 2398, Pub. L. 88–210, title III, §318, as added Pub. L. 105–332, §1(b), Oct. 31, 1998, 112 Stat. 3123, related to participation of private school personnel, prior to the general amendment of this chapter by Pub. L. 109–270.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date of 2018 Amendment

Amendment by Pub. L. 115–224 effective July 1, 2019, see section 4 of Pub. L. 115–224, set out as a note under section 2301 of this title.
In The 

Court of Appeals 

Seventh District of Texas at Amarillo

No. 07-18-00182-CV 

CENTRAL TEXAS CATTLEMEN’S ASSOCIATION, APPELLANT 

 

V. 

 

KENNETH L. HAEDGE, DALE C. TIPPIT, DENVER TIPPIT, 

CASE S. JONES, AND CLINTON H. SHED, APPELLEES 

 

On Appeal from the 52nd District Court 

Coryell County, Texas 

Trial Court No. DC-15-43362, Honorable Trent D. Farrell, Presiding 

 

July 12, 2018 

 

ORDER OF ABATEMENT 

 

Before QUINN, C.J., and PIRTLE and PARKER, JJ. 

Appellant, Central Texas Cattlemen’s Association, has filed an unopposed motion 

to abate this cause to enable the trial court to modify its “Order on Plaintiffs’ Motion for 

Release of Bond and on Defendant’s Motion for Calculation of Judgment” that was made 

expressly subject to a determination of whether any unpaid assessments owed by Clinton 

H. Shed are proven and are to be satisfied out of the supersedeas bond. Because this 

order does not dispose of all pending issues and parties, we directed CTCA to show why 
2

this Court has jurisdiction over this appeal. In its motion to abate, CTCA contends that 

the trial court scheduled a telephonic hearing on the matter for July 2, 2018.

In accordance with Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 27.2, we grant CTCA’s 

motion and abate this appeal and remand to the trial court to “allow [the] appealed order 

that is not final to be modified so as to be made final . . . .” Should the trial court modify 

its order in a manner intended to make it final, we direct it to cause the modified order 

and all related proceedings to be included in a supplemental record and filed with this 

Court on or before August 13, 2018. See TEX. R. APP. P. 27.2. However, if the trial court 

does not intend that its order be final, we direct it to enter findings of fact and conclusions 

of law reflecting its intent that the order not be final and cause the same to be included in 

a supplemental record that shall be filed with this Court on or before August 13, 2018.

Per Curiam
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 95-7456

RICARDO A. RENTERIA-PIEDRAHITA,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

W. J. THOMPSON, Warden, FCI Morgantown, WV;

FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS; JANET RENO, Attorney General of the United States; U.S. IMMIGRATION & NATURALIZATION SERVICE,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern

District of West Virginia, at Clarksburg. William M. Kidd, Senior

District Judge. (CA-95-98)

Submitted: December 12, 1995 Decided: January 5, 1996

Before WILKINS, WILLIAMS, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Ricardo A. Renteria-Piedrathita, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Ricardo A. Renteria-Piedrahita appeals from a district court

order denying his petition for mandamus relief. We affirm.

Renteria-Piedrahita petitioned the district court to grant him

mandamus relief in the form of an order to the Attorney General to

begin deportation proceedings as directed by 8 U.S.C. § 1252(i)

(1988). The district court found no private right of action and no

standing to seek mandamus relief under 28 U.S.C. § 1361 (1988). The

district court was correct. Amendment to immigration laws in 1994

forbids a construction of § 1252(i) that allows any private individual to force action to begin deportation proceedings. Immigration and Nationality Technical Corrections Act of 1994, Pub. L. No.

103-416, § 225, 108 Stat. 4305; see also Campos v. INS, 62 F.3d

311, 314 (9th Cir. 1995) (overruling prior Ninth Circuit cases);

Hernandez-Avalos, 50 F.3d 842, 844 (10th Cir. 1995), cert. denied,

64 U.S.L.W. 3241 (U.S. 1995).

Therefore, we affirm the district court order. We dispense

with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are

adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument

would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS

OF TEXAS

NO. WR-66,977-02

IN RE JIM MARCUS AND RICHARD BURR

ORDER TO APPEAR AND SHOW CAUSE FOR UNTIMELY FILED

PLEADINGS IN APPLICANT GARCIA’S CASE

FROM CAUSE NO. 2001CR4925-W2

IN THE 290 JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT

TH

BEXAR COUNTY

Per Curiam. PRICE, JOHNSON, and ALCALA, JJ., dissent. HERVEY, J., not

participating.

O R D E R

Applicant Frank Martinez Garcia was set for execution on Thursday, October 27,

2011. Counsel filed in the trial court on applicant’s behalf on October 26, 2011, a

subsequent writ application. He filed a motion for stay of execution on October 27, 2011.

Pursuant to our Miscellaneous Rule 11-003 setting out the requirements and possible

consequences of filing pleadings within the seven days preceding an applicant’s execution,

counsel Jim Marcus and Richard Burr filed with the untimely pleadings a declaration
Marcus/Burr/Garcia - 2

purporting to explain the untimely pleadings.

The Court found counsels’ declaration to be insufficient. However, before the Court

took any action pursuant to Miscellaneous Rule 11-003, it ordered both counsel to appear

before it at 9:00 a.m. on Wednesday, January 11, 2012. Counsel appeared as ordered. After

hearing counsels’ explanation, the Court finds that both counsel are in contempt of this Court

and assesses punishment at a fine of $500.00 each. The Court further suspends the

imposition of both fines for a period of one year. On the condition that counsel do not

violate the current filing rule during that period of time, the Court will thereafter vacate the

punishment.

IT IS SO ORDERED THIS THE 11 DAY OF JANUARY, 2012.

th

Do Not Publish
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK

Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department

1345 

CA 11-00532 

PRESENT: SMITH, J.P., PERADOTTO, LINDLEY, GREEN, AND MARTOCHE, JJ. 

 

VERIZON NEW YORK INC., PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT, 

V ORDER

ECSM UTILITY CONTRACTORS, INC., 

DEFENDANT-APPELLANT. 

(APPEAL NO. 1.) 

 

DOBSHINSKY & PRIYA, LLC, NEW YORK CITY (NEAL S. DOBSHINSKY OF

COUNSEL), FOR DEFENDANT-APPELLANT. 

SOLOMON AND SOLOMON, P.C., ALBANY (TODD M. SARDELLA OF COUNSEL), FOR

PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT. 

 

Appeal from an amended order of the Supreme Court, Onondaga

County (Deborah H. Karalunas, J.), entered December 2, 2010. The

amended order denied the cross motion of defendant for summary

judgment dismissing the complaint, granted in part the motion of

plaintiff for summary judgment and awarded plaintiff $210,896.51. 

It is hereby ORDERED that said appeal is unanimously dismissed

without costs (see Hughes v Nussbaumer, Clarke & Velzy, 140 AD2d 988;

Chase Manhattan Bank, N.A. v Roberts & Roberts, 63 AD2d 566, 567; see

also CPLR 5501 [a] [1]).

Entered: December 23, 2011 Frances E. Cafarell

Clerk of the Court