alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY ELEV

 452.28

 452.76

 453.37

 454.00

 454.65

 454.95

 455.20

 455.37

 455.46

 455.78

 455.92

 456.05

 456.17

 456.08

 456.20

 456.42

 456.68

 456.93

 457.26

 457.56

 457.79

 457.89

 457.87

 457.80

 457.78

 457.82

 458.29

 458.77

 459.09

 459.24

 459.49

 829.0

 834.0

 840.4

 847.0

 853.8

 857.0

 859.6

 861.4

 862.4

 865.7

 867.2

 868.6

 869.9

 868.9

 870.2

 872.5

 875.3

 878.0

 881.5

 884.7

 887.1

 888.2

 888.0

 887.2

 887.0

 887.5

 892.5

 897.7

 901.1

 902.7

 905.4

STORAGE

+5.8

+5.0

+6.4

+6.6

+6.8

+3.2

+2.6

+1.8

+1.0

+3.4

+1.5

+1.4

+1.3

-1.0

+1.3

+2.3

+2.8

+2.7

+3.5

+3.2

+2.5

+1.1

-0.2

-0.7

-0.2

+0.4

+5.0

+5.2

+3.4

+1.6

+2.7

CHANGE

6,755

6,338

6,955

7,183

7,692

7,010

6,825

6,432

6,152

6,883

6,191

5,966

5,876

5,307

6,131

6,546

6,817

6,837

6,888

6,997

6,816

5,834

5,350

5,072

5,340

5,401

7,471

8,391

6,871

6,394

6,671

INFLOW

 3,668

 3,646

 3,611

 3,665

 4,062

 5,240

 5,266

 5,300

 5,455

 5,026

 5,306

 5,161

 5,066

 5,575

 5,268

 5,142

 5,224

 5,333

 4,951

 5,213

 5,353

 5,065

 5,219

 5,202

 5,236

 5,021

 4,758

 5,569

 4,896

 5,334

 5,084

POWER

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 1

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

SPILL

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

OUTLET

 109

 125

 127

 125

 115

 110

 144

 149

 143

 119

 114

 111

 104

 147

 156

 162

 137

 132

 126

 143

 171

 178

 188

 176

 162

 140

 120

 144

 157

 182

 176

PUMPING

 52

 52

 10

 73

 70

 70

 84

 77

 74

 32

 25

 0

 63

 67

 63

 63

 63

 32

 35

 25

 53

 53

 50

 71

 50

 25

 53

 78

 82

 61

 50

C.F.S.

 .15

 .15

 .03

 .21

 .20

 .20

 .24

 .22

 .21

 .09

 .07

 .00

 .18

 .19

 .18

 .18

 .18

 .09

 .10

 .07

 .15

 .15

 .14

 .20

 .14

 .07

 .15

 .22

 .23

 .17

 .14

INCHES

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .09

 .60

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .31

 .24

 .34

 .00

 .00

 .00

PRECIP

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

MAY 2010 FOLSOM LAKE DAILY OPERATIONS RUN DATE: June 1, 2010

IN LAKE

EVAPORATION

INCHES

C.F.S. PLANT

COMPUTED*

1000 ACRE-FEET

RELEASE - C.F.S. 

 RIVER 

TOTALS +82.4 201,392 153,915 1 0 4,392 1,656 4.70 1.58

ACRE-FEET +82,400 399,461 305,290 2 0 8,712 3,285

COMMENTS:

* COMPUTED INFLOW IS THE SUM OF CHANGE IN STORAGE, RELEASES, PUMPING AND EVAPORATION.

SUMMARY

RELEASE (ACRE-FEET)

POWER 305,290

SPILL

PUMPING PLANT

 2

 8,712

TOTAL 314,004

PRECIPITATION

THIS MONTH =

JULY 1, 2009 TO DATE = 23.50

 823.2

OUTLET 0 1.58
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY HIGH

 136

 139

 142

 145

 147

 150

 150

 151

 156

 158

 163

 167

 171

 175

 177

 183

 188

 191

 195

 197

 201

 203

 202

 203

 202

 205

 206

 207

 209

 208

 210

 132

 133

 137

 138

 140

 143

 143

 146

 148

 151

 154

 156

 160

 162

 167

 170

 174

 174

 174

 178

 177

 176

 180

 181

 184

 187

 187

 191

 194

 195

 196

 134

 136

 138

 140

 142

 145

 146

 148

 151

 154

 157

 160

 165

 168

 171

 174

 179

 181

 182

 185

 187

 190

 192

 190

 189

 193

 195

 198

 198

 200

 201

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

AUGUST 2011 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: September 22, 2011

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

HOLLAND TRACT ON OLD RIVER
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                              5
<MULTIPLIER>                           1,000
       
<S>                                    <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                          3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                      DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                         JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                           MAR-31-1997
<CASH>                                  7,204
<SECURITIES>                                0
<RECEIVABLES>                          21,480
<ALLOWANCES>                            1,032
<INVENTORY>                            33,811
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                       68,322
<PP&E>                                 10,236
<DEPRECIATION>                          6,408
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                         96,315
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                  17,528
<BONDS>                                     0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                       0
<PREFERRED>                                 0
<COMMON>                                  882
<OTHER-SE>                             77,905
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>           96,315
<SALES>                                24,214
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                       24,214
<CGS>                                  15,194
<TOTAL-COSTS>                          10,836
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                           (4)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                            0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                        (57)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                        (1,763)
<INCOME-TAX>                             (714)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                    (1,049)
<DISCONTINUED>                              0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                             0
<CHANGES>                                   0
<NET-INCOME>                           (1,049)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                           (0.13)
<EPS-DILUTED>                           (0.13)
        



</TABLE>
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY ELEV

 977.11

 977.91

 978.54

 978.86

 979.02

 979.49

 979.86

 979.95

 980.17

 980.39

 980.61

 980.70

 980.64

 980.65

 980.84

 981.25

 981.86

 982.45

 982.82

 983.19

 983.57

 983.89

 984.11

 984.36

 984.49

 984.53

 984.52

 984.40

 984.42

 984.48

 984.52

 1,270.2

 1,276.9

 1,282.2

 1,284.9

 1,286.2

 1,290.2

 1,293.4

 1,294.1

 1,296.0

 1,297.9

 1,299.7

 1,300.5

 1,300.0

 1,300.1

 1,301.7

 1,305.2

 1,310.4

 1,315.4

 1,318.6

 1,321.8

 1,325.0

 1,327.8

 1,329.7

 1,331.9

 1,333.0

 1,333.3

 1,333.2

 1,332.2

 1,332.4

 1,332.9

 1,333.2

STORAGE

-0.2

+6.7

+5.3

+2.7

+1.3

+4.0

+3.1

+0.8

+1.9

+1.9

+1.9

+0.8

-0.5

+0.1

+1.6

+3.5

+5.2

+5.1

+3.2

+3.2

+3.3

+2.8

+1.9

+2.2

+1.1

+0.3

-0.1

-1.0

+0.2

+0.5

+0.3

CHANGE

2,507

5,946

5,051

4,119

3,224

3,245

3,055

2,918

2,802

2,574

2,520

2,360

2,241

2,440

3,366

4,415

4,505

4,390

4,315

4,185

4,072

3,785

3,265

3,207

2,977

2,677

2,105

1,726

1,773

2,020

2,322

INFLOW

 2,548

 2,541

 2,367

 2,715

 2,508

 1,187

 1,394

 2,482

 1,791

 1,579

 1,493

 1,905

 2,418

 2,331

 2,486

 2,587

 1,790

 1,718

 2,630

 2,472

 2,338

 2,327

 2,217

 2,037

 2,336

 2,422

 2,054

 2,139

 1,588

 1,677

 2,059

POWER

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

SPILL

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

OUTLET

 43

 19

 8

 44

 36

 52

 82

 52

 69

 52

 85

 69

 80

 66

 66

 66

 91

 125

 86

 111

 86

 70

 92

 81

 75

 81

 95

 109

 98

 81

 89

C.F.S.

 .16

 .07

 .03

 .16

 .13

 .19

 .30

 .19

 .25

 .19

 .31

 .25

 .29

 .24

 .24

 .24

 .33

 .45

 .31

 .40

 .31

 .25

 .33

 .29

 .27

 .29

 .34

 .39

 .35

 .29

 .32

INCHES

 .00

 1.83

 .07

 .20

 .06

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

PRECIP

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

MAY 2009 NEW MELONES LAKE DAILY OPERATIONS RUN DATE: July 15, 2009

IN LAKE

EVAPORATION

INCHES

C.F.S.

COMPUTED*

1000 ACRE-FEET

RELEASE - C.F.S.

TOTALS +63.1 100,107 66,136 0 0 2,259 8.16 2.16

ACRE-FEET +63,100 198,562 131,181 0 0 4,481

COMMENTS:

* COMPUTED INFLOW IS THE SUM OF CHANGE IN STORAGE, RELEASES AND EVAPORATION.

SUMMARY

RELEASE (ACRE-FEET)

POWER 131,181

SPILL 0

OUTLET

TOTAL

 0

 131,181

PRECIPITATION

THIS MONTH =

TO DATE =

 2.16

JULY 1, 2008 23.48

 1,270.3
### §128. Authorization of appropriations for partial support of operation of facilities; separate account

In order to facilitate operation of teaching hospital facilities at Howard University, there are authorized to be appropriated annually to the university such sums as the Congress may determine, for the partial support of the operation of such facilities giving consideration to the cost imposed by the provisions of section 125 of this title and the portion of the agreement under sections 124 to 129 of this title relating to such provisions. The cost of operating such facilities, the appropriations pursuant to this section, and any other income derived from such operation or available for such purpose shall be identified and accounted for separately in the accounts of the university.

(Pub. L. 87–262, §5, Sept. 21, 1961, 75 Stat. 543.)
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff—Appellee, v. Gary HALL, Defendant—Appellant.

No. 06-6144.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: July 20, 2006.

Decided: July 24, 2006.

Gary Hall, Appellant Pro Se.

Before WIDENER and WILKINSON, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Dismissed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).

*238PER CURIAM:

Gary Hall seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying relief on his motion to amend his previously dismissed 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (2000) motion. The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1) (2000). A certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2000). A prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that any assessment of the constitutional claims by the district court is debatable or wrong and that any dispositive procedural ruling by the district court is likewise debatable. *Miller-El v. Cockrell,*537 U.S. 322, 336-38, 123 S.Ct. 1029, 154 L.Ed.2d 931 (2003); *Slack v. McDaniel,*529 U.S. 473, 484, 120 S.Ct. 1595, 146 L.Ed.2d 542 (2000); *Rose v. Lee,*252 F.3d 676, 683-84 (4th Cir.2001). We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Hall has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*DISMISSED.*
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

DAY HIGH

 639

 640

 648

 651

 645

 620

 599

 597

 595

 595

 590

 601

 602

 615

 629

 644

 639

 633

 626

 617

 622

 611

 607

 629

 617

 645

 614

 607

 577

 601

 586

 598

 608

 617

 580

 572

 538

 534

 525

 545

 542

 547

 570

 567

 589

 600

 570

 572

 570

 550

 551

 557

 510

 486

 483

 482

 464

 458

 454

 456

 613

 618

 629

 635

 611

 595

 571

 567

 567

 572

 571

 568

 589

 596

 614

 626

 615

 611

 607

 581

 580

 584

 561

 557

 536

 528

 512

 518

 513

 519

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

SEPTEMBER 2007 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: October 10, 2007

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

TDS

 395

 398

 405

 408

 394

 384

 369

 366

 366

 369

 369

 367

 380

 384

 395

 403

 396

 394

 391

 375

 374

 377

 363

 360

 347

 342

 332

 336

 333

 337

TOTAL 17,364

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

DELTA MENDOTA CANAL AT CHECK 20
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit 

## FILED November 9, 2006 Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 05-20963 Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus LEONEL ANDAYA, Defendant-Appellant.

-------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. 4:02-CR-690-3

-------------------- Before BARKSDALE, DeMOSS, and PRADO, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: * Appealing the Judgment in a Criminal Case, Leonel Andaya raises arguments that are foreclosed by United States v. Slaughter , 238 F.3d 580, 582-84 (5th Cir. 2000), which held that Apprendi v. New Jersey , 530 U.S. 466 (2000), did not render 21 U.S.C. § 841 unconstitutional on its face. The Government’s motion for summary affirmance is GRANTED, and the judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

MEMORANDUM OPINION

No. 04-16-00338-CV

IN RE Allen Jackie JONES

Original Mandamus Proceeding1

PER CURIAM

Sitting: Karen Angelini, Justice

Patricia O. Alvarez, Justice

Jason Pulliam, Justice

Delivered and Filed: June 15, 2016

PETITION FOR WRIT OF MANDAMUS DENIED

On May 31, 2016, relator filed a petition for writ of mandamus. The court has considered 

relator’s petition for writ of mandamus and is of the opinion that relator is not entitled to the relief 

sought. Accordingly, the petition for writ of mandamus is denied. See TEX. R. APP. P. 52.8(a).

PER CURIAM

 1 This proceeding arises out of Cause No. 2013-CI-04328, styled In re Marriage of Tetyana Jones and Allen Jackie 

Jones, pending in the 57th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas, the Honorable Karen H. Pozza presiding.
### §3851. Repealed. Pub. L. 100–297, title I, §1003(a), Apr. 28, 1988, 102 Stat. 293

Section, Pub. L. 97–35, title V, §583, Aug. 13, 1981, 95 Stat. 476; Pub. L. 98–312, §4(b), June 12, 1984, 98 Stat. 234; Pub. L. 99–498, title XIV, §1404, Oct. 17, 1986, 100 Stat. 1599, related to authorization of discretionary program.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date of Repeal

Repeal effective July 1, 1988, see section 6303 of Pub. L. 100–297, set out as an Effective Date of 1988 Amendment note under section 1071 of this title.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY ELEV

 508.83

 508.14

 507.55

 506.91

 506.35

 505.91

 505.87

 504.80

 504.23

 503.66

 503.06

 502.83

 502.42

 502.10

 501.66

 501.24

 501.04

 500.78

 499.95

 499.76

 499.11

 498.42

 497.56

 496.80

 496.09

 495.34

 494.27

 493.48

 493.05

 492.34

 492.30

 242.6

 240.4

 238.5

 236.6

 234.8

 233.5

 233.3

 230.0

 228.3

 226.6

 224.8

 224.1

 222.8

 221.9

 220.6

 219.3

 218.7

 217.9

 215.5

 214.9

 213.0

 211.0

 208.5

 206.4

 204.3

 202.2

 199.2

 197.0

 195.8

 193.8

 193.7

STORAGE

-1.9

-2.2

-1.8

-2.0

-1.7

-1.4

-0.1

-3.3

-1.7

-1.7

-1.8

-0.7

-1.2

-1.0

-1.3

-1.3

-0.6

-0.8

-2.4

-0.6

-1.9

-2.0

-2.5

-2.2

-2.0

-2.1

-3.0

-2.2

-1.2

-2.0

-0.1

CHANGE

1,773

1,731

1,748

1,308

1,313

1,729

2,388

703

1,504

1,445

1,165

1,803

1,633

1,821

1,780

1,790

1,888

1,546

696

1,830

1,670

2,000

1,806

1,830

1,715

1,723

1,406

1,855

2,278

1,545

1,941

INFLOW

 597

 705

 763

 718

 569

 547

 551

 460

 474

 539

 520

 490

 478

 460

 477

 476

 467

 532

 456

 434

 613

 676

 599

 596

 579

 563

 547

 491

 539

 547

 396

MADERA

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

SPILL

 1,845

 1,803

 1,608

 1,294

 1,318

 1,567

 1,613

 1,600

 1,605

 1,482

 1,247

 1,371

 1,490

 1,565

 1,673

 1,652

 1,423

 1,111

 1,187

 1,375

 1,714

 2,024

 2,160

 2,028

 1,843

 1,917

 2,078

 2,171

 2,033

 1,673

 1,285

FRIANT-KERN

 28

 58

 48

 42

 42

 42

 26

 40

 43

 38

 55

 32

 27

 23

 35

 37

 42

 34

 31

 47

 39

 32

 23

 30

 38

 37

 24

 31

 35

 39

 42

C.F.S.

 .27

 .57

 .47

 .42

 .42

 .42

 .26

 .40

 .44

 .39

 .56

 .33

 .28

 .24

 .36

 .39

 .44

 .35

 .33

 .49

 .41

 .34

 .25

 .32

 .41

 .40

 .27

 .35

 .39

 .44

 .47

INCHES

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

PRECIP

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

AUGUST 2001 MILLERTON LAKE DAILY OPERATIONS RUN DATE: January 28, 2002

IN LAKE

EVAPORATION

INCHES

C.F.S.

COMPUTED*

1000 ACRE-FEET

RELEASE - C.F.S. 

TOTALS -50.7 51,363 16,859 50,755 0 1,140 11.88 .00

ACRE-FEET -50,747 101,879 33,440 100,673 0 2,261

COMMENTS:

* COMPUTED INFLOW IS THE SUM OF CHANGE IN STORAGE, RELEASES, PUMPING AND EVAPORATION.

SUMMARY

RELEASE (ACRE-FEET)

CANALS

FRIANT-KERN

MADERA

 100,673

 33,440 150,370

PRECIPITATION

THIS MONTH =

JULY 1, 2001 TO DATE = 0.10

 244.5

 16,257 0.00

CANALS

AT FRIANT

TOTAL RELEASES

OUTLET

 262

 262

 261

 261

 260

 260

 260

 260

 259

 259

 259

 259

 259

 257

 256

 256

 256

 256

 256

 255

 264

 279

 278

 277

 277

 277

 275

 274

 274

 274

 274

RIVER

 8,196

 16,257

RIVER
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

DAY ELEV

 498.34

 498.67

 499.18

 499.61

 500.07

 500.30

 501.07

 501.57

 502.36

 503.24

 504.14

 505.17

 506.37

 507.45

 508.33

 508.61

 509.62

 509.92

 510.78

 511.52

 512.43

 513.33

 515.28

 516.60

 518.10

 519.35

 520.38

 521.55

 522.63

 523.52

 210.8

 211.8

 213.2

 214.5

 215.9

 216.5

 218.8

 220.3

 222.7

 225.3

 228.0

 231.2

 234.9

 238.2

 241.0

 241.9

 245.1

 246.0

 248.8

 251.2

 254.1

 257.0

 263.4

 267.8

 272.9

 277.1

 280.7

 284.7

 288.5

 291.6

STORAGE

+0.7

+1.0

+1.5

+1.3

+1.3

+0.7

+2.3

+1.5

+2.4

+2.6

+2.7

+3.1

+3.7

+3.4

+2.8

+0.9

+3.2

+1.0

+2.7

+2.4

+2.9

+2.9

+6.4

+4.4

+5.1

+4.3

+3.5

+4.0

+3.8

+3.1

CHANGE

1,720

1,913

2,226

2,148

2,102

1,597

2,132

1,618

2,108

2,247

2,255

2,340

2,470

2,252

2,095

1,410

2,625

1,491

2,181

1,904

2,194

2,022

3,551

2,534

2,859

2,455

2,088

2,340

2,208

1,884

INFLOW

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

MADERA

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

SPILL

 995

 1,070

 1,113

 1,144

 1,060

 889

 628

 504

 559

 545

 510

 387

 246

 207

 210

 257

 302

 303

 96

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

FRIANT-KERN

 8

 10

 14

 18

 11

 14

 5

 10

 6

 12

 15

 16

 10

 3

 12

 8

 12

 9

 2

 5

 9

 8

 9

 6

 2

 4

 6

 2

 9

 7

C.F.S.

 .08

 .11

 .15

 .19

 .12

 .15

 .05

 .10

 .06

 .12

 .15

 .16

 .10

 .03

 .12

 .08

 .12

 .09

 .02

 .05

 .09

 .08

 .08

 .06

 .02

 .04

 .05

 .02

 .08

 .06

INCHES

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .47

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .46

 .62

 .18

 .02

 .63

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .20

 .00

 .00

 .00

PRECIP

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

NOVEMBER 2010 MILLERTON LAKE DAILY OPERATIONS RUN DATE: December 1, 2010

IN LAKE

EVAPORATION

INCHES

C.F.S.

COMPUTED*

1000 ACRE-FEET

RELEASE - C.F.S. 

TOTALS +81.5 64,969 0 11,025 0 262 2.63 2.58

ACRE-FEET +81,520 128,866 0 21,868 0 520

COMMENTS:

* COMPUTED INFLOW IS THE SUM OF CHANGE IN STORAGE, RELEASES, PUMPING AND EVAPORATION.

SUMMARY

RELEASE (ACRE-FEET)

CANALS

FRIANT-KERN

MADERA

 21,868

 0 46,828

PRECIPITATION

THIS MONTH =

JULY 1, 2010 TO DATE = 4.22

 210.1

 24,960 2.58

CANALS

AT FRIANT

TOTAL RELEASES

OUTLET

 351

 350

 350

 351

 351

 352

 353

 353

 353

 355

 355

 350

 348

 348

 482

 700

 698

 699

 699

 701

 703

 538

 308

 311

 311

 305

 301

 302

 303

 303

RIVER

 12,584

 24,960

RIVER
###### Editorial Note on Part 40

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 40 appear by T.D. ATF-460, 66 FR 39094-39096, July 27, 2001; T.D. ATF-464, 66 FR 43479, Aug. 20, 2001; and T.D. TTB-91, 76 FR 5479, Feb. 1, 2011.

#### § 40.475 Action by claimant.

Where cigarette papers and tubes are lost (other than by theft) or destroyed, by fire, casualty, or act of God, and the manufacturer desires to file claim under the provisions of § 40.472 or § 40.473, the manufacturer shall indicate on the claim the nature, date, and extent of such loss or destruction. The claim shall be accompanied by such evidence as necessary to establish to the satisfaction of the appropriate TTB officer that the claim is valid.

(72 Stat. 1419; 26 U.S.C. 5705)

Withdrawn From the Market.
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 96-1303
LEON WILSON, JR., Plaintiff - Appellant, versus COUNTY OF DORCHESTER; CITY OF SUMMERVILLE; ROY E. WHITEHEAD, Chief of Police; E. WORSHAM, Summerville Po lice; J. A. WOODS, South Carolina Department of Public Safety, Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Charleston. David C. Norton, District Judge. (CA-95-746-18-AJ) Submitted: January 23, 1997 Decided: January 29, 1997 Before RUSSELL, WILKINS, and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Leon Wilson, Jr., Appellant Pro Se. Stephanie Pendarvis McDonald, STUCKEY & SENN, Charleston, South Carolina; Donna Seegars Givens, BROWN & WOODS, Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: Leon Wilson, Jr., appeals the district court's order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1994) complaint. We have reviewedthe record and the district court's opinion accepting the magistrate judge's recommendation and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Wilson v. County of Dorchester , No. CA-95-746-18-AJ (D.S.C. Feb. 9, 1996). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED