alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY ELEV

 3,468.02

 3,467.97

 3,467.78

 3,467.59

 3,467.40

 3,467.29

 3,467.14

 3,466.97

 3,466.85

 3,466.73

 3,466.55

 3,466.39

 3,466.18

 3,465.95

 3,465.82

 3,465.62

 3,465.44

 3,465.25

 3,465.07

 3,464.88

 3,464.70

 3,464.52

 3,464.37

 3,464.18

 3,463.98

 3,463.77

 3,463.65

 3,463.47

 3,463.28

 3,463.04

 3,462.85

 39,132

 39,100

 38,981

 38,862

 38,743

 38,674

 38,580

 38,473

 38,399

 38,324

 38,212

 38,113

 37,982

 37,839

 37,759

 37,636

 37,524

 37,407

 37,296

 37,180

 37,070

 36,960

 36,868

 36,752

 36,630

 36,503

 36,430

 36,321

 36,206

 36,060

 35,946

STORAGE

-82

-32

-119

-119

-119

-69

-94

-107

-74

-75

-112

-99

-131

-143

-80

-123

-112

-117

-111

-116

-110

-110

-92

-116

-122

-127

-73

-109

-115

-146

-114

CHANGE

19.9

51.2

8.5

5.3

5.7

24.5

16.3

9.8

26.1

26.8

13.7

24.2

6.8

-3.8

36.9

13.6

24.0

21.7

19.6

13.8

16.8

15.1

25.8

3.9

8.4

5.1

33.5

12.5

11.0

-1.5

12.7

INFLOW

 56

 62

 63

 59

 61

 54

 58

 58

 58

 59

 64

 69

 67

 62

 72

 70

 75

 74

 72

 67

 67

 66

 67

 57

 64

 63

 65

 62

 64

 67

 65

CONDUIT

 .0

 .0

 .0

 .0

 .0

 .0

 .0

 .0

 .0

 .0

 .0

 .0

 .0

 .0

 .0

 .0

 .0

 .0

 .0

 .0

 .0

 .0

 .0

 .0

 .0

 .0

 .0

 .0

 .0

 .0

 .0

SPILL

 1.0

 1.0

 1.0

 1.0

 1.0

 1.0

 1.0

 1.0

 1.0

 1.0

 1.0

 1.0

 1.0

 1.0

 1.0

 1.0

 1.0

 1.0

 1.0

 1.0

 1.0

 1.0

 1.0

 1.0

 1.0

 1.0

 1.0

 1.0

 1.0

 1.0

 1.0

PK CR

 4.2

 4.3

 4.5

 5.3

 3.7

 4.3

 4.7

 4.7

 4.4

 4.6

 5.2

 4.1

 4.8

 5.3

 4.2

 4.6

 4.5

 5.7

 2.6

 4.3

 4.3

 3.6

 4.2

 4.4

 4.9

 5.1

 4.3

 4.5

 4.0

 4.1

 4.2

C.F.S.

 .205

 .212

 .222

 .260

 .180

 .212

 .232

 .230

 .218

 .226

 .257

 .204

 .240

 .264

 .210

 .227

 .227

 .285

 .130

 .215

 .217

 .180

 .212

 .223

 .246

 .260

 .218

 .229

 .205

 .210

 .215

INCHES

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

PRECIP

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

JULY 2002 JENKINSON LAKE DAILY OPERATIONS RUN DATE: 08/20/2002

IN LAKE

EVAPORATION

INCHES

C.F.S.

COMPUTED*

ACRE-FEET

RELEASE - C.F.S. 

TOTALS -3,268 507.9 1,987 31.0 0.0 137.6 6.871 .00

ACRE-FEET -3,268 1,007.4 3,941 61.5 0.0 272.9

COMMENTS:

* COMPUTED INFLOW IS THE SUM OF CHANGE IN STORAGE, RELEASES AND EVAPORATION.

DATA BASED ON 24 HOUR PERIOD ENDING 0800.

SUMMARY

RELEASE (ACRE-FEET)

CAMINO-CONDUIT 3,941.2

SLY PARK CREEK

SPILL

 61.5

 0.0

 0.0

PRECIPITATION

THIS MONTH =

JULY 1, 2002 TO DATE = 0.00

 39,214

 3,941.2 0.00

CAMINO SLY

CAMP

CREEK

C.F.S.

 3

 3

 2

 2

 2

 2

 2

 2

 2

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 33

 65

E.I.D. PROJECT

E.I.D. WATER RIGHTS
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY ELEV

 498.41

 498.87

 498.95

 498.74

 498.32

 498.07

 497.88

 497.74

 498.23

 498.20

 498.31

 498.50

 498.72

 498.75

 499.09

 499.64

 499.80

 500.28

 500.72

 501.45

 501.55

 501.78

 501.37

 501.23

 501.32

 501.52

 501.63

 501.74

 501.92

 502.02

 502.35

 211.0

 212.3

 212.6

 212.0

 210.7

 210.0

 209.5

 209.1

 210.5

 210.4

 210.7

 211.3

 211.9

 212.0

 213.0

 214.6

 215.1

 216.5

 217.8

 219.9

 220.2

 220.9

 219.7

 219.3

 219.5

 220.1

 220.5

 220.8

 221.3

 221.6

 222.6

STORAGE

-0.9

+1.3

+0.2

-0.6

-1.2

-0.7

-0.5

-0.4

+1.4

-0.1

+0.3

+0.6

+0.6

+0.1

+1.0

+1.6

+0.5

+1.4

+1.3

+2.2

+0.3

+0.7

-1.2

-0.4

+0.3

+0.6

+0.3

+0.3

+0.5

+0.3

+1.0

CHANGE

1,059

2,231

1,828

1,509

1,188

1,236

1,087

1,224

2,230

1,417

1,440

1,325

1,215

832

1,288

1,725

1,305

1,846

1,706

2,070

1,077

1,337

506

981

1,340

1,348

1,101

1,025

1,084

757

1,014

INFLOW

 230

 230

 230

 230

 249

 259

 259

 239

 228

 229

 229

 229

 230

 230

 230

 231

 232

 233

 234

 235

 236

 236

 236

 236

 235

 177

 197

 236

 237

 74

 0

MADERA

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

SPILL

 1,050

 1,111

 1,259

 1,364

 1,332

 1,122

 871

 960

 1,067

 1,009

 847

 607

 414

 352

 353

 471

 621

 666

 602

 527

 474

 540

 670

 737

 734

 656

 521

 393

 352

 323

 302

FRIANT-KERN

 20

 15

 19

 20

 20

 19

 32

 26

 19

 21

 1

 9

 47

 4

 3

 8

 13

 31

 11

 12

 13

 11

 11

 14

 32

 11

 13

 26

 20

 5

 8

C.F.S.

 .21

 .16

 .20

 .21

 .21

 .20

 .34

 .28

 .20

 .22

 .01

 .10

 .50

 .04

 .03

 .08

 .14

 .33

 .11

 .12

 .13

 .11

 .11

 .15

 .33

 .11

 .14

 .27

 .21

 .05

 .08

INCHES

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .09

 .64

 .36

 .02

 .02

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .90

 .02

 .91

 .20

 .00

 .00

PRECIP

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

OCTOBER 2000 MILLERTON LAKE DAILY OPERATIONS RUN DATE: January 28, 2002

IN LAKE

EVAPORATION

INCHES

C.F.S.

COMPUTED*

1000 ACRE-FEET

RELEASE - C.F.S. 

TOTALS +10.7 41,331 6,796 22,307 0 514 5.38 3.16

ACRE-FEET +10,720 81,980 13,480 44,246 0 1,020

COMMENTS:

* COMPUTED INFLOW IS THE SUM OF CHANGE IN STORAGE, RELEASES, PUMPING AND EVAPORATION.

SUMMARY

RELEASE (ACRE-FEET)

CANALS

FRIANT-KERN

MADERA

 44,246

 13,480 70,248

PRECIPITATION

THIS MONTH =

JULY 1, 2000 TO DATE = 3.67

 211.9

 12,522 3.16

CANALS

AT FRIANT

TOTAL RELEASES

OUTLET

 213

 202

 203

 203

 202

 202

 202

 202

 202

 202

 202

 202

 202

 202

 203

 203

 203

 204

 204

 204

 204

 205

 205

 204

 204

 204

 205

 205

 205

 205

 205

RIVER

 6,313

 12,522

RIVER
### §1022e. Teacher development

#### (a) Annual goals

Each institution of higher education that conducts a traditional teacher preparation program (including programs that offer any ongoing professional development programs) or alternative routes to State certification or licensure program, and that enrolls students receiving Federal assistance under this chapter, shall set annual quantifiable goals for increasing the number of prospective teachers trained in teacher shortage areas designated by the Secretary or by the State educational agency, including mathematics, science, special education, and instruction of limited English proficient students.

#### (b) Assurances

Each institution described in subsection (a) shall provide assurances to the Secretary that—

(1) training provided to prospective teachers responds to the identified needs of the local educational agencies or States where the institution's graduates are likely to teach, based on past hiring and recruitment trends;

(2) training provided to prospective teachers is closely linked with the needs of schools and the instructional decisions new teachers face in the classroom;

(3) prospective special education teachers receive course work in core academic subjects and receive training in providing instruction in core academic subjects;

(4) general education teachers receive training in providing instruction to diverse populations, including children with disabilities, limited English proficient students, and children from low-income families; and

(5) prospective teachers receive training on how to effectively teach in urban and rural schools, as applicable.

#### (c) Rule of construction

Nothing in this section shall be construed to require an institution to create a new teacher preparation area of concentration or degree program or adopt a specific curriculum in complying with this section.

(Pub. L. 89–329, title II, §206, as added Pub. L. 110–315, title II, §201(2), Aug. 14, 2008, 122 Stat. 3152.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Prior Provisions

A prior section 206 of Pub. L. 89–329 was classified to section 1026 of this title, prior to repeal by Pub. L. 110–315.

Another prior section 206 of Pub. L. 89–329 was classified to section 1026 of this title, prior to the general amendment of this subchapter by Pub. L. 96–374.
#### Rose Quaytman, as Administratrix of the Estate of Mark Quaytman, Deceased, et al., Appellants, v. Long Island Rail Road Company, Respondent.

No opinion. Present—Close, P. J., Hagarty, Johnston, Taylor and Lewis, JJ.
March 19, 1998

Mr. Kevin Tubbs Director, Environmental Technology

American Standard One Central Avenue Piscataway, New Jersey 08855-6820

Dear Mr. Tubbs:

This is in response to your February 3, 1998 letter to Richard Wilson, Acting Assistant Administrator, Office of Air and Radiation, requesting an interim policy determination related to the New Source Review/Prevention of Significant Deterioration (NSR/PSD) significance level for ozone-depleting substances (ODS). I understand that your concern focuses on very small amounts of potential fugitive emissions from refrigeration and air-conditioning equipment.

On July 23, 1996, the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) proposed a significance level of 100 tons per year (TPY) for ODS. The EPA received no adverse comments on this proposed significance level. In addition, the EPA recently responded to a similar request made by the State of Louisiana’s Department of Environmental Quality, stating that EPA would have no objection to the State not conducting a PSD review for ODS emissions from a chlorofluorocarbon (CFC) recycling and reclamation facility that would potentially emit substantially less than 100 TPY of ODS.

The EPA has reviewed the emissions characteristics associated with refrigeration and airconditioning units, such as commercial refrigeration, industrial chillers, all types of air conditioners, and other related refrigeration equipment. In cases where a source is adding cooling capacity, EPA believes that potential emissions from the added refrigeration and air-conditioning units will be significantly less than 100 TPY. Our understanding is that any anticipated emissions from these units would primarily be fugitive, estimated between 5 and 20 pounds per year. The EPA’s current refrigerant recovery and leak repair requirements and the high price of refrigerants help to ensure that these emissions will remain minuscule. In light of these and other factors, EPA will not object to a State or local air pollution control agency’s decision not to conduct a PSD review for refrigeration and air-conditioning units with the potential to emit ODS in relatively minute quantities.2

This response has been coordinated with EPA’s Office of General Counsel, Office of Enforcement and Compliance Assurance, and Office of Atmospheric Programs. If you have any questions or concerns on this issue, please contact David Solomon of the Integrated Implementation Group at (919) 541-5375.

I appreciate the opportunity to be of service and trust that this information will be helpful to you.

Sincerely,

/s/ Henry Thomas for

John S. Seitz Director Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards

cc: Bruce Buckheit, Director, Air Enforcement Division, OECA Alan Eckert, Associate General Counsel, Air and Radiation Division, OGC Paul Stolpman, OAP
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
     This schedule  contains summary  financial  information  extracted from the
consolidated  balance  sheet and the  consolidated  statement of earnings and is
qualified in its entirety by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                        JUN-30-2000
<PERIOD-END>                             MAR-31-2000
<CASH>                                        22,991
<SECURITIES>                                   8,270
<RECEIVABLES>                                 18,947
<ALLOWANCES>                                   1,173
<INVENTORY>                                   11,693
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                              73,088
<PP&E>                                        35,176
<DEPRECIATION>                                18,885
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                99,447
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                         15,742
<BONDS>                                            0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                              0
<PREFERRED>                                        0
<COMMON>                                       1,198
<OTHER-SE>                                    80,071
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                  99,447
<SALES>                                       60,836
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                              60,836
<CGS>                                         35,538
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                 35,538
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                              20,385
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                5,564
<INCOME-TAX>                                   1,833
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            3,731
<DISCONTINUED>                                     0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                  (67)
<CHANGES>                                          0
<NET-INCOME>                                   3,664
<EPS-BASIC>                                   .32
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   .30



</TABLE>
### §109. Repeal of statutes as affecting existing liabilities

The repeal of any statute shall not have the effect to release or extinguish any penalty, forfeiture, or liability incurred under such statute, unless the repealing Act shall so expressly provide, and such statute shall be treated as still remaining in force for the purpose of sustaining any proper action or prosecution for the enforcement of such penalty, forfeiture, or liability. The expiration of a temporary statute shall not have the effect to release or extinguish any penalty, forfeiture, or liability incurred under such statute, unless the temporary statute shall so expressly provide, and such statute shall be treated as still remaining in force for the purpose of sustaining any proper action or prosecution for the enforcement of such penalty, forfeiture, or liability.

(July 30, 1947, ch. 388, 61 Stat. 635.)
Editorial Note on Part 46
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 46 appear by T.D. ATF-457, 66 FR 32220, 32221, June 14, 2001.

§ 46.206 Articles in a foreign trade zone. If articles subject to floor stocks tax are stored in a foreign trade zone established under the Foreign Trade Zone Act (the Act of June 18, 1934, 48 Stat. 998, 19 U.S.C. 81a *et seq.*), the dealer is liable for the tax and must take an inventory in accordance with § 46.207 or when either of the following conditions apply: ( a ) Internal revenue taxes have been determined or customs duties liquidated, with respect to the articles pursuant to the first proviso of section 3(a) of the Foreign Trade Zone Act; or
( b ) Articles are held by a customs officer pursuant to the second proviso of section 3(a) of the Foreign Trade Zone Act.
#### In the Matter of Edwin H. Greenleaf against Jonah J. Goldstein.

Present — Martin, P. J., Untermyer, Dore, Cohn and Callahan, JJ.
### SUBCHAPTER I—READING IMPROVEMENT PROJECTS
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY ELEV

 122.64

 122.42

 122.34

 123.02

 123.32

 123.29

 124.19

 123.95

 124.60

 124.15

 124.11

 122.74

 122.68

 122.85

 123.12

 124.04

 123.78

 123.37

 122.93

 123.24

 123.57

 123.59

 123.62

 124.37

 124.74

 122.89

 122.37

 123.45

 124.20

 123.46

 123.24

 7,629

 7,530

 7,494

 7,800

 7,941

 7,927

 8,356

 8,238

 8,561

 8,336

 8,316

 7,674

 7,647

 7,724

 7,847

 8,281

 8,158

 7,965

 7,760

 7,904

 8,059

 8,068

 8,082

 8,446

 8,631

 7,742

 7,508

 8,003

 8,361

 8,007

 7,904

STORAGE

-72

-99

-36

+306

+141

-14

+429

-118

+323

-225

-20

-642

-27

+77

+123

+434

-123

-193

-205

+144

+155

+9

+14

+364

+185

-889

-234

+495

+358

-354

-103

CHANGE

1,516

1,507

1,511

1,699

1,627

1,527

1,761

1,596

1,696

1,457

1,537

1,509

1,839

1,895

1,918

2,076

1,787

1,757

1,765

1,932

2,028

1,860

1,957

2,136

1,934

1,401

1,736

2,783

2,709

2,455

2,490

INFLOW

 1,464

 1,464

 1,436

 1,441

 1,463

 1,442

 1,452

 1,562

 1,440

 1,453

 1,454

 1,740

 1,759

 1,759

 1,760

 1,745

 1,752

 1,741

 1,755

 1,744

 1,855

 1,757

 1,852

 1,852

 1,742

 1,752

 1,755

 2,434

 2,430

 2,531

 2,443

POWER

 0

 0

 0

 11

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 23

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 15

 0

 15

 15

 16

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

SPILL

 60

 60

 60

 60

 60

 60

 60

 60

 60

 60

 60

 60

 60

 60

 60

 60

 60

 60

 60

 60

 58

 60

 60

 60

 60

 60

 60

 60

 60

 61

 60

HATCHERY

 2

 3

 3

 3

 3

 2

 3

 3

 3

 4

 3

 3

 2

 2

 1

 2

 2

 3

 3

 4

 3

 3

 3

 5

 4

 2

 4

 4

 4

 2

 4

C.F.S.

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

MAY 2001 LAKE NATOMA DAILY OPERATIONS RUN DATE: June 25, 2001

IN LAKE

EVAP

C.F.S.

COMPUTED*

ACRE-FEET

RELEASE - C.F.S.

TOTALS +203 57,401 54,229 95 1,859 92

ACRE-FEET +203 113,855 107,563 188 3,687 182

COMMENTS:

* COMPUTED INFLOW IS THE SUM OF CHANGE IN STORAGE, RELEASES AND EVAPORATION.

SUMMARY

RELEASES (ACRE-FEET)

POWER 107,563

SPILL 188

FOLSOM SOUTH CANAL

HATCHERY

 2,025

 3,687

 7,701

FOLSOM

SOUTH 

CANAL

 26

 30

 30

 30

 30

 30

 30

 30

 30

 30

 30

 30

 32

 35

 35

 35

 35

 35

 35

 35

 34

 35

 35

 35

 35

 35

 35

 35

 35

 39

 35

 1,021

 2,025

(1)

(1) INCHES OF EVAPORATION TAKEN FROM FOLSOM PAN.

RELEASES (ACRE-FEET)

TOTAL 113,463

Table 12
I 

116TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 5632 

To establish procedures regarding the approval of opioid drugs by the Food 

and Drug Administration. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JANUARY 16, 2020 

Mr. KIM introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee 

on Energy and Commerce 

A BILL 

To establish procedures regarding the approval of opioid 

drugs by the Food and Drug Administration. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘FDA Accountability 

5 for Public Safety Act’’. 

6 SEC. 2. APPROVAL AGAINST THE RECOMMENDATION OF 

7 THE FDA ADVISORY COMMITTEE ON OPIOID 

8 DRUGS. 

9 (a) IN GENERAL.—Any approval of an application or 

10 supplement to an application under section 505(b) of the 

2 

•HR 5632 IH

1 Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (21 U.S.C. 355(b)) 

2 for a drug that is an opioid against the recommendation 

3 of the advisory committee pursuant to section 106 of the 

4 Comprehensive Drug and Recovery Act of 2016 (Public 

5 Law 114–198) shall be made by the Commissioner of 

6 Food and Drugs (referred to in this section as the ‘‘Com7 missioner’’) and shall not be delegated. 

8 (b) REPORTS TO CONGRESS.—If the Commissioner 

9 approves a drug as described in subsection (a), the Com10 missioner shall— 

11 (1) submit a report to the Committee on 

12 Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions of the Sen13 ate and the Committee on Energy and Commerce of 

14 the House of Representatives, and to any member of 

15 Congress that requests the report, that includes— 

16 (A) medical and scientific evidence regard17 ing patient safety that clearly supports the 

18 Commissioner’s decision to approve the opioid 

19 drug against the recommendation of the advi20 sory committee; and 

21 (B) a disclosure of any potential conflicts 

22 of interest that may exist regarding any official 

23 of the Food and Drug Administration who was 

24 involved in the decision to approve the drug 

3 

•HR 5632 IH

1 prior to the Commissioner’s final decision under 

2 subsection (a); and 

3 (2) at the request of the Committee on Health, 

4 Education, Labor, and Pensions of the Senate or the 

5 Committee on Energy and Commerce of the House 

6 of Representatives, testify before that committee re7 garding the Commissioner’s decision to approve the 

8 opioid drug against the recommendation of the advi9 sory committee. 

10 (c) PROHIBITION ON MARKETING.—A drug approved 

11 as described in subsection (a) shall not be introduced or 

12 delivered for introduction into interstate commerce until 

13 the report described in subsection (b)(1) has been sub14 mitted to Congress. 

15 (d) SCOPE OF ADVISORY COMMITTEE REVIEW.—Sec16 tion 106(a)(1)(A) of the Comprehensive Addiction and Re17 covery Act of 2016 (Public Law 114–198) is amended— 

18 (1) by inserting ‘‘, or supplement to an applica19 tion,’’ after ‘‘application’’ each place such term ap20 pears; and 

21 (2) by striking ‘‘of a new’’ and inserting ‘‘for’’. 

Æ
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY HIGH

 1,795

 1,708

 1,793

 1,810

 1,750

 1,788

 1,791

 1,793

 1,799

 1,915

 1,888

 1,830

 1,903

 1,937

 1,855

 1,704

 1,638

 1,572

 1,513

 1,429

 1,371

 1,348

 1,515

 1,483

 1,424

 1,365

 1,295

 1,249

 1,186

 1,145

 1,126

 1,404

 1,391

 1,394

 1,428

 1,400

 1,402

 1,372

 1,364

 1,359

 1,370

 1,414

 1,372

 1,318

 1,378

 1,308

 1,326

 1,352

 1,340

 1,345

 1,272

 1,242

 1,227

 1,185

 1,193

 1,201

 1,154

 1,122

 1,128

 1,105

 1,080

 1,049

 1,558

 1,533

 1,574

 1,565

 1,529

 1,540

 1,537

 1,536

 1,540

 1,611

 1,607

 1,557

 1,587

 1,589

 1,523

 1,506

 1,484

 1,454

 1,420

 1,356

 1,317

 1,309

 1,339

 1,340

 1,327

 1,264

 1,232

 1,199

 1,159

 1,124

 1,097

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

DECEMBER 2015 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: January 5, 2016

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

FARRAR PARK AT DUTCH SLOUGH
### SUBCHAPTER VIII—PALEONTOLOGICAL INVESTIGATIONS