alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY ELEV

 1,900.95

 1,901.46

 1,901.86

 1,901.11

 1,901.42

 1,901.26

 1,901.60

 1,901.14

 1,901.16

 1,901.24

 1,901.46

 1,901.31

 1,901.50

 1,901.48

 1,901.48

 1,901.20

 1,901.53

 1,901.44

 1,901.45

 1,901.25

 1,901.44

 1,901.31

 1,901.05

 1,901.21

 1,901.75

 1,900.99

 1,900.89

 1,901.24

 1,901.15

 1,901.25

 1,901.01

 13,874

 14,255

 14,554

 13,993

 14,225

 14,105

 14,360

 14,016

 14,031

 14,091

 14,255

 14,143

 14,285

 14,270

 14,270

 14,061

 14,307

 14,240

 14,248

 14,098

 14,240

 14,143

 13,948

 14,068

 14,472

 13,904

 13,830

 14,091

 14,023

 14,098

 13,918

STORAGE

-30

+381

+299

-561

+232

-120

+255

-344

+15

+60

+164

-112

+142

-15

+0

-209

+246

-67

+8

-150

+142

-97

-195

+120

+404

-568

-74

+261

-68

+75

-180

CHANGE

3,284

3,311

3,045

2,880

3,298

3,206

3,146

2,964

3,117

3,103

3,342

2,906

3,292

3,212

2,175

1,895

2,066

1,949

3,026

3,023

3,158

2,870

2,514

3,062

3,132

2,623

391

552

386

449

330

INFLOW

 80

 80

 80

 80

 80

 80

 80

 80

 80

 80

 80

 80

 80

 80

 80

 80

 80

 80

 80

 80

 80

 80

 80

 80

 80

 83

 80

 80

 80

 80

 80

POWER

 280

 280

 280

 280

 280

 280

 289

 300

 300

 300

 300

 300

 300

 300

 300

 166

 150

 150

 150

 150

 150

 150

 138

 130

 130

 135

 130

 130

 130

 130

 130

SPILL

 90

 90

 90

 90

 90

 90

 81

 70

 70

 70

 70

 70

 70

 70

 70

 70

 70

 70

 70

 70

 70

 70

 82

 90

 90

 94

 90

 90

 90

 80

 90

OUTLETS

 4

 3

 3

 2

 4

 4

 4

 4

 3

 4

 2

 2

 3

 2

 2

 2

 2

 2

 2

 3

 2

 2

 2

 2

 2

 3

 2

 2

 2

 3

 3

C.F.S.

 .18

 .15

 .15

 .11

 .17

 .18

 .17

 .18

 .16

 .18

 .10

 .10

 .13

 .11

 .11

 .08

 .10

 .09

 .11

 .14

 .10

 .10

 .09

 .10

 .08

 .16

 .10

 .10

 .11

 .14

 .15

INCHES

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

OCTOBER 2003 LEWISTON LAKE DAILY OPERATIONS RUN DATE: November 24, 2003

IN LAKE

EVAPORATION

C.F.S. FRANCIS CARR

COMPUTED*

ACRE-FEET

RELEASE - C.F.S. 

TOTALS +14 77,707 2,483 2,467 6,618 82 3.93

ACRE-FEET +14 154,132 4,925 4,893 13,127 163

* COMPUTED INFLOW IS THE SUM OF CHANGE IN STORAGE, RELEASES AND EVAPORATION.

(1) OUTLET RELEASE INCLUDES THE CONTINUOUS FISH RELEASE OF 75 C.F.S.

(2) INCHES OF EVAPORATION TAKEN FROM PAN AT TRINITY RIVER HATCHERY

SUMMARY

RELEASE (ACRE-FEET)

TOTAL POWER 4,925

TOTAL RIVER 22,945 153,947

 13,904

 131,002

RIVER

JUDGE FRANCIS CARR POWERPLANT

TOTAL RELEASE

JUDGE (2)

(1) POWERPLANT

 2,845

 2,666

 2,441

 2,711

 2,727

 2,812

 2,563

 2,683

 2,656

 2,619

 2,807

 2,510

 2,767

 2,768

 1,723

 1,682

 1,640

 1,681

 2,720

 2,796

 2,784

 2,617

 2,310

 2,700

 2,626

 2,594

 126

 118

 118

 118

 118

 66,046

 131,002

Table 6
###### Editorial Note on Part 26

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 26 appear by T.D. ATF-451, 66 FR 21668, 21669, May 1, 2001.

#### § 26.36c Shipments of bulk distilled spirits to the United States without payment of tax.

Bulk distilled spirits may be brought into the United States from Puerto Rico without payment of tax for transfer from customs custody to the bonded premises of a distilled spirits plant qualified under part 19 of this chapter. Such shipments are subject to the provisions of subpart Ib.

[T.D. ATF-62, 44 FR 71709, Dec. 11, 1979]
FILED

September 16, 1997

Cecil Crowson, Jr.

Appellate Court Clerk

IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TENNESSEE

AT JACKSON

HASTIE EUGENE LOVE, )

)

Petitioner, ) C. C. A. NO. 02C01-9706-CC-00214

)

 vs. ) LAUDERDALE COUNTY

)

STATE OF TENNESSEE, ) No. 4933

)

Respondent. )

O R D E R

This matter is before the Court upon the state’s motion, pursuant to Rule

20, Rules of the Court of Criminal Appeals, to affirm the judgment of the trial court in

this case by order rather than formal opinion. The above-captioned case represents an

appeal from the trial court’s dismissal of the petitioner’s petition for writ of habeas

corpus. The record was filed on June 20, 1997, and the petitioner filed his brief on July

16, 1997. The petitioner is currently serving concurrent ninety-nine year sentences for

two convictions of rape he received in 1968. The petitioner contends that his sentence

has expired because the statute under which he was sentenced no longer exists and

the current law imposes a lesser penalty for the offenses committed.

Having reviewed the state’s motion in light of the petitioner’s brief and the

record as a whole, we conclude that the motion is well-taken and should be granted. In

dismissing the petition, the trial court found that the petitioner had failed to show upon

the face of the judgment or the record of the proceedings upon which the judgment was

rendered that the convicting court was without jurisdiction or authority to sentence the

petitioner or that the petitioner’s sentence of imprisonment or other restraint has

expired. See State v. Archer, 851 S.W.2d 157 (Tenn. 1993). 

We agree with the trial court’s ruling. The convicting court in this case

had jurisdiction over both the subject matter and person, and nothing in the record
2

before us demonstrates that the convicting court’s actions were unauthorized. Nor has

the petitioner shown that his sentence has expired. Contrary to the petitioner's

argument, the Tennessee Criminal Sentencing Reform Act of 1989, which repealed the

statute under which the petitioner was convicted and sentenced, specifically states that

"[t]his act shall not affect rights and duties matured, penalties that were incurred, or

proceedings that were begun before its effective date." 1989 Tenn. Pub. Acts ch. 591, §

115. See also State ex rel. Stewart v. McWherter, 857 S.W.2d 875 (Tenn. Crim. App.

1992); State v. Russell, 866 S.W.2d 578 (Tenn. Crim. App. 1991). Therefore, since the

petitioner is not challenging the appropriateness of his sentence at the time it was

imposed, his present claim must fail.

Accordingly, we cannot find any error on the part of the trial court in

dismissing the petition. It is therefore ORDERED that the state’s motion is granted. 

Pursuant to Rule 20 of the Rules of the Court of Criminal Appeals, we affirm the trial court’s dis

the petitioner’s petition for writ of habeas corpus.

Enter, this the ___ day of August, 1997.

______________________________

PAUL G. SUMMERS, JUDGE

______________________________

JOE B. JONES, PRESIDING JUDGE

______________________________

DAVID G. HAYES, JUDGE
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

DAY ELEV

 579.57

 578.55

 581.51

 580.30

 581.71

 582.10

 581.41

 581.78

 583.47

 583.18

 582.79

 580.75

 582.91

 581.50

 580.66

 580.47

 577.60

 576.99

 574.83

 578.86

 580.65

 582.05

 582.47

 584.72

 585.37

 584.25

 583.17

 583.79

 582.68

 583.52

 19,282

 18,714

 20,399

 19,697

 20,516

 20,746

 20,340

 20,557

 21,568

 21,392

 21,158

 19,956

 21,229

 20,393

 19,904

 19,795

 18,193

 17,862

 16,724

 18,885

 19,898

 20,716

 20,967

 22,334

 22,739

 22,044

 21,386

 21,763

 21,092

 21,599

STORAGE

-40

-568

+1,685

-702

+819

+230

-406

+217

+1,011

-176

-234

-1,202

+1,273

-836

-489

-109

-1,602

-331

-1,138

+2,161

+1,013

+818

+251

+1,367

+405

-695

-658

+377

-671

+507

CHANGE

14,914

14,672

19,014

26,012

30,307

30,337

29,699

30,871

36,180

39,869

40,024

39,060

40,394

34,185

29,358

24,901

20,221

17,963

14,923

14,197

11,674

9,977

8,334

7,713

6,317

5,528

5,285

5,683

5,119

5,724

INFLOW

 8,704

 8,891

 8,767

 8,355

 7,784

 7,356

 7,264

 7,727

 6,800

 7,586

 9,119

 9,046

 8,507

 8,409

 8,294

 8,009

 8,793

 8,942

 9,218

 9,185

 9,192

 8,983

 8,003

 6,867

 6,022

 5,788

 5,527

 5,403

 5,367

 5,378

POWER

 6,142

 5,981

 9,313

 17,924

 22,024

 22,779

 22,554

 22,950

 28,784

 32,285

 30,935

 30,533

 31,157

 26,108

 21,223

 16,862

 12,149

 9,100

 6,191

 3,835

 1,882

 493

 114

 67

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

SPILL

 85

 85

 82

 85

 85

 85

 85

 85

 85

 85

 85

 85

 85

 85

 85

 85

 85

 85

 85

 85

 85

 85

 85

 85

 85

 85

 85

 85

 85

 85

FISHTRAP

 3

 1

 2

 2

 1

 1

 1

 0

 1

 2

 3

 2

 3

 4

 3

 0

 2

 3

 3

 3

 4

 4

 5

 5

 6

 5

 5

 5

 5

 5

C.F.S.

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

APRIL 2019 KESWICK RESERVOIR DAILY OPERATIONS RUN DATE: May 1, 2019

RES.

EVAP

C.F.S.

COMPUTED*

ACRE-FEET

RELEASE - C.F.S. 

TOTALS +2,277 618,455 233,286 381,385 2,547 89

ACRE-FEET +2,277 1,226,705 462,723 756,477 5,052 177

SUMMARY

RELEASE (ACRE-FEET)

POWER 462,723

SPILL 756,477

 19,322

FISH TRAP 5,052

SPRING

CR. P. P.

RELEASE (1)

 1,367

 3,054

 1,472

 1,613

 2,735

 2,880

 1,553

 1,134

 1,794

 1,166

 781

 797

 425

 152

 227

 427

 233

 184

 302

 106

 77

 128

 147

 236

 146

 135

 123

 88

 106

 85

 23,673

 46,955

*COMPUTED INFLOW IS SUM OF CHANGE IN STORAGE, RELEASES, AND EVAPORATION.

SHASTA

RELEASE

C.F.S

 13,113

 11,203

 16,408

 23,154

 25,633

 25,482

 26,526

 28,304

 33,137

 37,565

 38,324

 37,491

 38,964

 33,087

 28,278

 23,438

 19,134

 17,113

 14,251

 13,715

 11,197

 9,765

 7,881

 7,155

 5,884

 5,163

 4,995

 5,465

 4,766

 5,458

 572,049

 1,134,659
June 2023

 STORAGE1000 ACRE-FEET COMPUTED* RELEASE - C.F.S. EVAPORATION PRECIP

DAY ELEV IN LAKE CHANGE INFLOW

C.F.S. POWER SPILL OUTLET C. F. S. INCHES INCHES

1,829.7

1 1,037.53 1,840.9 11.2 8,387 2,630 0 0 89 0.26 0.00

2 1,038.53 1,851.5 10.5 8,189 2,770 0 0 103 0.30 0.00

3 1,039.34 1,860.0 8.6 7,868 3,439 0 0 110 0.32 0.00

4 1,040.30 1,870.2 10.2 8,078 2,831 0 0 113 0.33 0.00

5 1,041.22 1,880.0 9.8 7,807 2,819 0 0 52 0.15 0.00

6 1,042.26 1,891.1 11.1 8,563 2,866 0 0 97 0.28 0.00

7 1,043.19 1,901.1 10.0 7,954 2,862 0 0 69 0.20 0.00

8 1,043.88 1,908.5 7.4 6,836 3,047 0 0 52 0.15 0.02

9 1,044.52 1,915.4 6.9 6,548 2,985 0 0 87 0.25 0.00

10 1,045.21 1,922.8 7.4 6,664 2,799 0 0 112 0.32 0.00

11 1,046.07 1,932.1 9.3 7,223 2,462 0 0 70 0.20 0.00

12 1,046.67 1,938.6 6.5 6,470 3,127 0 0 60 0.17 0.00

13 1,047.28 1,945.3 6.6 6,506 3,079 0 0 84 0.24 0.00

14 1,048.00 1,953.1 7.8 6,611 2,552 0 0 106 0.30 0.00

15 1,048.90 1,962.9 9.8 7,347 2,280 0 0 110 0.31 0.00

16 1,049.63 1,970.9 8.0 6,997 2,850 0 0 114 0.32 0.00

17 1,050.31 1,978.4 7.5 6,604 2,719 0 0 121 0.34 0.00

18 1,051.02 1,986.2 7.8 6,011 1,970 0 0 103 0.29 0.00

19 1,051.77 1,994.5 8.3 7,193 2,895 0 0 125 0.35 0.00

20 1,052.37 2,001.1 6.6 6,338 2,886 0 0 107 0.30 0.00

21 1,052.93 2,007.3 6.2 5,502 2,261 0 0 115 0.32 0.00

22 1,053.18 2,010.1 2.8 4,788 3,271 0 0 118 0.33 0.00

23 1,053.50 2,013.7 3.6 4,861 2,968 0 0 101 0.28 0.00

24 1,053.81 2,017.1 3.4 4,715 2,885 0 0 94 0.26 0.00

25 1,054.13 2,020.7 3.6 4,873 2,974 0 0 104 0.29 0.00

26 1,054.43 2,024.0 3.3 4,781 2,983 0 0 112 0.31 0.00

27 1,054.75 2,027.6 3.6 4,866 2,956 0 0 112 0.31 0.00

28 1,055.07 2,031.1 3.6 4,843 2,927 0 0 116 0.32 0.00

29 1,055.38 2,034.6 3.5 4,861 2,986 0 0 127 0.35 0.00

30 1,055.68 2,038.0 3.4 4,783 2,954 0 0 138 0.38 0.00

TOTALS 208.3 193,067 85,033 0 0 3,021 8.53 0.02

ACRE-FEET 208,300 382,948 168,663 0 0 5,992

Comments: * COMPUTED INFLOW IS THE SUM OF CHANGE IN STORAGE, RELEASES, PUMPING AND EVAPORATION

 SUMMARY

Release (ACRE-FEET)

Power 168,663 Outlet 0

Spill 0 Total Releases 168,663

Precipitation

This month = 0.02

October 01, 2022 To date = 46.91

Historical Archive and Report Database

New Melones Lake Daily Operations

Run Date: 7/18/2023
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<RESTATED> 
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JAN-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             FEB-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               JUL-31-1996
<CASH>                                           2,462
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   79,540
<ALLOWANCES>                                     4,881
<INVENTORY>                                     37,305
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               118,136
<PP&E>                                          76,610
<DEPRECIATION>                                  39,325
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 196,146
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            79
<OTHER-SE>                                      86,992
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   196,146
<SALES>                                        158,769
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               158,769
<CGS>                                          100,908
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  100,908
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                40,608
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                 1,336
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               1,405
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 16,073
<INCOME-TAX>                                     7,157
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              8,916
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     8,916
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .56
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .56
        

</TABLE>
(No. 74-CC-689

#### Barnes Hospital, Claimant, vs. State of Illinois, Division of Vocational Rehabilitation, Respondent.

*Opinion filed June 26, 1974.*

Barnes Hospital, Claimant, pro se.

William J. Scott, Attorney General; Howard W. Feldman, Assistant Attorney General, for Respondent.

Per Curiam.
###### Editorial Note on [Part 41](/current/title-27/part-41?toc=1)

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 41 (formerly part 275) appear at T.D. ATF-460, [66 FR 39093](https://www.federalregister.gov/citation/66-FR-39093), July 27, 2001.

#### § 41.33 Smokeless tobacco tax rates.

Smokeless tobacco products are taxed at the following rates under [26 U.S.C. 5701(e)](https://www.govinfo.gov/link/uscode/26/5701):

| Product | Tax rate per pound\* for removals during the following periods: | |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 2002 to March 31, 2009 | April 1, 2009 and after |
| Snuff | $0.585 | $1.51 |
| Chewing tobacco | $0.195 | $0.5033 |
| | | |
| --- | --- | --- |
| \* Prorate tax for fractions of a pound. | | |

[T.D. TTB-75, [74 FR 14484](https://www.federalregister.gov/citation/74-FR-14484), Mar. 31, 2009]
###### Editorial Note on Part 44

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 44 appear by T.D. ATF-464, 66 FR 43480, Aug. 20, 2001, and T.D. ATF-480, 67 FR 30801-30803, May 8, 2002.

#### § 44.250 Indecent or immoral material.

No indecent or immoral picture, print, or representation shall be contained in, attached to, or stamped, marked, written, or printed on any package of cigars withdrawn under this subpart.

(72 Stat. 1422; 26 U.S.C. 5723)
###### Editorial Note on Part 44

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 44 appear by T.D. ATF-464, 66 FR 43480, Aug. 20, 2001, and T.D. ATF-480, 67 FR 30801-30803, May 8, 2002.

#### § 44.145 Special.

A special inventory shall be made by the export warehouse proprietor whenever required by any appropriate TTB officer.

(72 Stat. 1422; 26 U.S.C. 5721)
#### The People of the State of New York ex rel. W. A. Realty Corporation, Relator-Respondent, against Harry B. Chambers et al., Constituting the Tax Commission of the City of New York, Respondents-Appellants. [67-73 W. 44th Street, 1140-1144 Avenue of the Americas, Borough of Manhattan.]

The respondents-appellants having appealed to this court from the final order of the Supreme Court, New York County, entered on or about June 17, 1947, reducing the assessments on the relator’s real property above set forth; and the said appeal having been argued by Anthony Curreri, Esq., of counsel for the respondents-appellants and by Christian S. Lorentzen, Esq., of counsel for *1032the relator-respondent, and due deliberation having been had thereon, it is unanimously

Ordered that the said order so appealed from be and the same hereby is reversed upon the facts and law, with $20 costs and disbursements to the respondents-appellants, and the assessments of the Tax Commission of the City of New York reinstated and confirmed, with costs, on the ground that the evidence supports the values fixed by the Tax Commission for the years involved, and it is further unanimously

Ordered that the findings of fact in the decision made by the court at Special Term that the following are the proper values for the tax year involved:

*Year Lot Land Building Total*1945-46 1 $235,000 ....... $270,000 1945-46 5 225,000 $460,000 685,000

be and the same hereby are reversed; and this court in following findings of fact and conclusions of law: lieu thereof makes the

*Findings of Fact*

That the following year involved: are the proper values for the said property for the tax

*Year Lot Land Building Total*1945-46 1 $275,000 $ 35,000 $310,000 1945-46 5 255,000 545,000 800,000

*Conclusions of Law*

That the assessments upon the relator’s real property for the tax year 1945-46 should be increased to and fixed at the values fixed by the Tax Commission of the City of New York for said tax year, to wit:

*Year Lot Land Building Total*1945-46 1 $275,000 $ 35,000 $310,000 1945-46 5 255,000 545,000 800,000

and it is further unanimously

Ordered and directed that the officer or officers having custody of the assessment rolls or the tax rolls upon which the above-mentioned assessment and any taxes levied thereon have been entered shall forthwith correct the said entries in conformity with this order and shall note upon the margin of said rolls opposite the said entries that the same have been corrected by the authority of this order.

Present — Peck, P, J., Grlennon, Cohn, Yan Voorhis and Shientag, JJ. [See *ante,*p. 761.]
Exhibit 3.44.2
  NAVIOS HANDYBULK INC.
 
  
 Annual Meetings.
 Special Meeting.
 Notice of Meetings.
 Quorum.
 1




---



##### 



Voting.
 Fixing of Record Dates.
 
 Number
 How Elected
 Removal
 Vacancies.
 Regular Meetings
 2




---



##### 



Special Meetings.
 Notice of Special Meeting.
 Quorum.
 Voting
 Compensation of Directors and Members of Committees.
 
 Executive Committee and Other Committees.
 3




---



##### 



Number and Designation.
  President. ,
 Treasurer.
 Secretary.
 Other Officers
 4




---



##### 



Bond.
 
 Form and Issuance.
 Transfer.
 Loss of Stock Certificates.
 
 Declaration and Form.
 
 Corporate Seal.
 
 Fiscal Year.
 5




---



##### 



By the Shareholders.
 By the Directors.
 6
###### Editorial Note on Part 44

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 44 appear by T.D. ATF-464, 66 FR 43480, Aug. 20, 2001, and T.D. ATF-480, 67 FR 30801-30803, May 8, 2002.

#### § 44.211 [Reserved]
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY HIGH

 2,264

 2,061

 2,050

 2,179

 2,332

 2,919

 4,317

 5,246

 4,341

 4,318

 3,753

 3,611

 2,906

 2,188

 1,915

 1,574

 1,412

 1,387

 1,397

 1,440

 2,027

 1,494

 1,485

 1,133

 1,325

 1,617

 4,390

 4,308

 3,812

 2,853

 1,986

 706

 729

 711

 757

 797

 901

 1,030

 1,003

 1,015

 964

 1,048

 1,022

 1,084

 977

 932

 889

 853

 859

 853

 873

 922

 880

 952

 1,000

 996

 1,002

 1,046

 1,210

 1,229

 1,296

 1,167

 1,208

 1,187

 1,171

 1,280

 1,277

 1,446

 1,848

 2,103

 1,865

 1,804

 1,787

 1,839

 1,640

 1,352

 1,229

 1,098

 1,020

 1,022

 1,014

 1,067

 1,191

 1,106

 1,152

 1,053

 1,076

 1,264

 2,041

 2,150

 2,025

 1,778

 1,398

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

DECEMBER 2004 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: January 20, 2005

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

14 DAY

ACCUM

MEAN

14 DAY

AVG

MEAN

 16,638

 16,599

 16,671

 16,899

 17,174

 17,434

 18,077

 18,988

 19,600

 20,135

 20,297

 20,983

 21,559

 21,807

 21,828

 21,739

 21,588

 21,330

 21,067

 20,688

 20,031

 19,034

 18,321

 17,570

 16,859

 16,284

 16,685

 17,483

 18,279

 18,959

 19,337

 1,188

 1,186

 1,191

 1,207

 1,227

 1,245

 1,291

 1,356

 1,400

 1,438

 1,450

 1,499

 1,540

 1,558

 1,559

 1,553

 1,542

 1,524

 1,505

 1,478

 1,431

 1,360

 1,309

 1,255

 1,204

 1,163

 1,192

 1,249

 1,306

 1,354

 1,381

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

JERSEY POINT TOP ON THE SAN JOAQUIN RIVER
###### Editorial Note on Part 26

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 26 appear by T.D. ATF-451, 66 FR 21668, 21669, May 1, 2001.

#### § 26.306 Drawback of tax.

Any person who brings eligible articles into the United States from the Virgin Islands may claim drawback of the distilled spirits excise taxes paid on such articles as provided in this subpart.
#### G. Edgar Allen, as Trustee in Bankruptcy, etc., Respondent, v. Samuel E. Bailey and Another, Appellants.

Motion for leave to appeal to the Court of Appeals denied. Present — Jenks, P. J., Burr, Thomas, Carr and Rich, JJ.
###### Editorial Note on Part 28

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 28 appear by T.D. ATF-477, 67 FR 18087 through 18090, Apr. 15, 2002.

#### § 28.241 Shipment for export, or for use on vessels.

All liquors and specially denatured spirits intended for export or liquors intended for use as supplies on vessels shall be consigned to the district director of customs at the port of exportation, or port of lading for supplies on vessels, except that when the shipment is for export to a contiguous foreign territory it shall be consigned to the foreign consignee at destination in care of the district director of customs at the port of export.

(72 Stat. 1334, 1335, 1336, 1362, 1380; 26 U.S.C. 5053, 5055, 5062, 5214, 5362)

[25 FR 5734, June 23, 1960, as amended by T.D. 7006, 34 FR 2251, Feb. 15, 1969. Redesignated at 40 FR 16835, Apr. 15, 1975]
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

DAY HIGH

 3,074

 2,420

 2,556

 2,497

 2,677

 3,123

 3,261

 3,159

 3,182

 3,530

 3,208

 2,304

 1,963

 1,876

 1,957

 1,865

 1,892

 2,345

 3,073

 3,624

 3,742

 5,134

 3,929

 3,661

 3,353

 3,550

 3,560

 3,709

 3,935

 4,437

 1,121

 875

 1,009

 993

 986

 1,006

 981

 1,024

 1,007

 1,024

 1,047

 1,041

 982

 900

 918

 807

 832

 836

 888

 928

 936

 984

 1,016

 921

 926

 954

 1,000

 1,087

 1,216

 1,322

 1,805

 1,466

 1,443

 1,374

 1,429

 1,522

 1,561

 1,571

 1,598

 1,707

 1,717

 1,502

 1,361

 1,236

 1,178

 1,089

 1,081

 1,185

 1,436

 1,576

 1,665

 1,998

 1,676

 1,631

 1,598

 1,695

 1,816

 2,040

 2,174

 2,175

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

NOVEMBER 2014 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: December 1, 2014

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

14 DAY

ACCUM

MEAN

14 DAY

AVG

MEAN

 27,893

 27,155

 26,258

 25,530

 25,061

 24,641

 24,169

 23,247

 22,751

 22,575

 22,546

 22,310

 21,901

 21,292

 20,665

 20,288

 19,926

 19,737

 19,744

 19,798

 19,902

 20,329

 20,407

 20,331

 20,212

 20,405

 20,860

 21,664

 22,660

 23,746

 1,992

 1,940

 1,876

 1,824

 1,790

 1,760

 1,726

 1,661

 1,625

 1,613

 1,610

 1,594

 1,564

 1,521

 1,476

 1,449

 1,423

 1,410

 1,410

 1,414

 1,422

 1,452

 1,458

 1,452

 1,444

 1,458

 1,490

 1,547

 1,619

 1,696

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

JERSEY POINT TOP ON THE SAN JOAQUIN RIVER