Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 69 / Monday, April 11, 2011 / Notices 20009 

DATES: Effective Date: May 1, 2011. 

SUMMARY: Pursuant to 36 CFR 51.24, 

public notice is hereby given that the 

National Park Service proposes to award 

a temporary concession contract for the 

conduct of certain visitor services 

within Assateague Island National 

Seashore, Maryland for a term not to 

exceed 3 (three) years. The visitor 

services include the sale of merchandise 

and limited pre-packaged food and 

beverage. This action is necessary to 

avoid interruption of visitor services. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The 

temporary concession contract is 

proposed to be awarded to Assateague 

Island Alliance, a qualified person (as 

defined in 36 CFR 51.3). The National 

Park Service has determined that a 

temporary concession contract is 

necessary in order to avoid interruption 

of visitor services and has taken all 

reasonable and appropriate steps to 

consider alternatives to avoid an 

interruption of visitor services. This 

action is issued pursuant to 36 CFR 

51.24(a). This is not a request for 

proposals. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Jo 

A. Pendry, Chief, Commercial Services 

Program, National Park Service, 1201 

Eye Street, NW., 11th Floor, 

Washington, DC 20005, Telephone: 202/ 

513–7156. 

Dated: March 25, 2011. 

Peggy O’Dell, 

Deputy Director, Operations. 

[FR Doc. 2011–8525 Filed 4–8–11; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4312–53–P 

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE 

Notice of Lodging Proposed Consent 

Decree 

In accordance with Departmental 

Policy, 28 CFR 50.7, notice is hereby 

given that a proposed Consent Decree in 

United States Of America v. Bar-1 

Ranch, Ltd.; Bar 1 Ranch, Llc; Bar-1 

Ranch 2, Llc; Bar-One Ranch 

Management, Llc; and Alfred Barone, 

Docket No. 9:09-cv-00130–DWM–JCL, 

was lodged with the United States 

District Court for the District of Montana 

on March 31, 2011. 

This proposed Consent Decree 

concerns a complaint filed by the 

United States against Bar-1 Ranch, Ltd.; 

Bar 1 Ranch, Llc; Bar-1 Ranch 2, Llc; 

Bar-One Ranch Management, Llc; and 

Alfred Barone, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 

1331, 1345, and 1355, and Sections 301, 

309(b), and 404 of the Clean Water Act, 

33 U.S.C. 1311, 1319(b) and 1344, to 

obtain injunctive relief from and impose 

civil penalties against the Defendants 

for violating the Clean Water Act by 

discharging pollutants without a permit 

into waters of the United States. The 

proposed Consent Decree resolves these 

allegations by requiring the Defendants 

to restore the impacted areas and to pay 

a civil penalty. 

The Department of Justice will accept 

written comments relating to this 

proposed Consent Decree for thirty (30) 

days from the date of publication of this 

Notice. Please address comments to 

Daniel Pinkston, Environmental Defense 

Section, Environment and Natural 

Resources Division, U.S. Department of 

Justice, 999 18th Street, South Terrace, 

Suite 370, Denver, Colorado 80202, and 

refer to United States v. Bar-1 Ranch, 

Ltd., DJ #90–5–1–1–18203. 

The proposed Consent Decree may be 

examined at the Clerk’s Office, United 

States District Court for the District of 

Montana, Russell Smith Courthouse, 

201 East Broadway, Missoula, Montana 

59801. In addition, the proposed 

Consent Decree may be viewed at http:// 

www.usdoj.gov/enrd/ 

Consent_Decrees.html. 

Cherie L. Rogers, 

Assistant Section Chief, Environmental 

Defense Section, Environment & Natural 

Resources Division. 

[FR Doc. 2011–8501 Filed 4–8–11; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE 

Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms 

and Explosives 

[OMB Number 1140–0058] 

Agency Information Collection 

Activities: Proposed Collection; 

Comments Requested 

ACTION: 60-Day Notice of Information 

Collection Under Review: Investigator 

Integrity Questionnaire. 

The Department of Justice (DOJ), 

Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms 

and Explosives (ATF), will be 

submitting the following information 

collection request to the Office of 

Management and Budget (OMB) for 

review and approval in accordance with 

the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995. 

This notice requests comments from the 

public and affected agencies concerning 

the proposed information collection. 

Comments are encouraged and will be 

accepted for ‘‘sixty days’’ until June 10, 

2011. This process is conducted in 

accordance with 5 CFR 1320.10. 

If you have comments especially on 

the estimated public burden or 

associated response time, suggestions, 

or need a copy of the proposed 

information collection instrument with 

instructions or additional information, 

please contact Renee Reid, 

Renee.Reid@atf.gov, Chief, Personnel 

Security Branch, Room 1.E–300, 99 New 

York Ave, NE., Washington, DC 20226. 

Written comments concerning this 

information collection should be sent to 

the Office of Information and Regulatory 

Affairs, Office of Management and 

Budget, Attn: DOJ Desk Officer. The best 

way to ensure your comments are 

received is to e-mail them to 

oira_submission@omb.eop.gov or fax 

them to 202–395–7285. All comments 

should reference the 8 digit OMB 

number for the collection or the title of 

the collection. If you have questions 

concerning the collection, please call 

Renee Reid at 202–648–9620 or the DOJ 

Desk Officer at 202–395–3176. 

Written comments and suggestions 

from the public and affected agencies 

concerning the proposed information 

collection are encouraged. Your 

comments should address one or more 

of the following four points: 

—Evaluate whether the proposed 

collection of information is necessary 

for the proper performance of the 

functions of the agency, including 

whether the information will have 

practical utility; 

—Evaluate the accuracy of the agencies 

estimate of the burden of the 

proposed collection of information, 

including the validity of the 

methodology and assumptions used; 

—Enhance the quality, utility, and 

clarity of the information to be 

collected; and 

—Minimize the burden of the collection 

of information on those who are to 

respond, including through the use of 

appropriate automated, electronic, 

mechanical, or other technological 

collection techniques or other forms 

of information technology, e.g., 

permitting electronic submission of 

responses. 

Summary of Collection 

(1) Type of Information Collection: 

Revision of a currently approved 

collection. 

(2) Title of the Form/Collection: 

Investigator Integrity Questionnaire. 

(3) Agency form number, if any, and 

the applicable component of the 

Department of Justice sponsoring the 

collection: Form Number: ATF F 8620.7. 

Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms 

and Explosives. 

(4) Affected public who will be asked 

or required to respond, as well as a brief 

abstract: Primary: Individuals or 

households. Other: None. 

Need for Collection: 


srobinson on DSKHWCL6B1PROD with NOTICES
20010 Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 69 / Monday, April 11, 2011 / Notices 

1The Government did not explain the basis for its 

position that an application filed after a registration 

expires is nonetheless timely. 

2The Order was based on a recommended 

decision of a three-member panel designated by the 

Director of the DOPL to act as the presiding officer 

in the proceeding. The panel’s findings included, 

inter alia, that: 1) Respondent had ‘‘stored 

controlled substances [Versed and Provigil] * * * 

in his personal vehicle,’’ as well as ‘‘41 prescription 

pads which contained multiple blank prescriptions 

that had been presigned by other physicians’’ at a 

clinic he was no longer affiliated with, id. at 9, 11– 

12, 16–17; that he had failed to comply with a 

previous state order that he ‘‘submit a triplicate 

copy’’ of a controlled substance prescription (for 

testosterone, a schedule III steroid) for review by 

the Division, id. at 21–22; that he had committed 

unprofessional conduct when he advised A.S. to 

administer to her son a controlled substance 

(Klonopin) which he had prescribed to her, id. at 

21, 23–24; and that he had violated section 58–37– 

6(7)(o) of the Utah Controlled Substances Act by 

ATF utilizes the services of contract 

investigators to conduct security/ 

suitability investigations on prospective 

or current employees, as well as those 

contractors and consultants doing 

business with ATF. Persons interviewed 

by contract investigators will be 

randomly selected to voluntarily 

complete a questionnaire regarding the 

investigator’s degree of professionalism. 

(5) An estimate of the total number of 

respondents and the amount of time 

estimated for an average respondent to 

respond: It is estimated that 2,500 

respondents will complete a 5 minute 

form. 

(6) An estimate of the total public 

burden (in hours) associated with the 

collection: There are an estimated 250 

annual total burden hours associated 

with this collection. 

If additional information is required 

contact: Lynn Murray, Department 

Clearance Officer, Policy and Planning 

Staff, Justice Management Division, 

United States Department of Justice, 

Two Constitution Square, 145 N Street, 

NE., Room 2E–808, Washington, DC 

20530. 

Dated: April 5, 2011. 

Lynn Murray, 

Department Clearance Officer, PRA, 

Department of Justice. 

[FR Doc. 2011–8486 Filed 4–8–11; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4410–FY–P 

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE 

Antitrust Division 

Notice Pursuant to the National 

Cooperative Research and Production 

Act of 1993—DVD Copy Control 

Association 

Notice is hereby given that, on March 

9, 2011, pursuant to Section 6(a) of the 

National Cooperative Research and 

Production Act of 1993, 15 U.S.C. 4301 

et seq. (‘‘the Act’’), DVD Copy Control 

Association (‘‘DVD CCA’’) has filed 

written notifications simultaneously 

with the Attorney General and the 

Federal Trade Commission disclosing 

changes in its membership. The 

notifications were filed for the purpose 

of extending the Act’s provisions 

limiting the recovery of antitrust 

plaintiffs to actual damages under 

specified circumstances. Specifically, 

Behavior Tech Computer Corp., Taipei, 

TAIWAN; Dongguan ChuDong 

Electronic Technology Co., Ltd., 

Dongguan City, Guangdong, PEOPLE’S 

REPUBLIC OF CHINA; and Wistron 

Corporation, Taipei Hsien, TAIWAN, 

have been added as parties to this 

venture. 

Also, Dongguan Qisheng Electronic 

Industrial Co., Ltd., Dongguan City, 

Guangdong, PEOPLE’S REPUBLIC OF 

CHINA; Global Publishing Inc., 

Fremont, CA; Inventec Corporation, 

Taipei, TAIWAN; and Marvell 

International Ltd., Hamilton, 

BERMUDA, have withdrawn as parties 

to this venture. 

No other changes have been made in 

either the membership or planned 

activity of the group research project. 

Membership in this group research 

project remains open, and DVD CCA 

intends to file additional written 

notifications disclosing all changes in 

membership. 

On April 11, 2001, DVD CCA filed its 

original notification pursuant to Section 

6(a) of the Act. The Department of 

Justice published a notice in the Federal 

Register pursuant to Section 6(b) of the 

Act on August 3, 2001 (66 FR 40727). 

The last notification was filed with 

the Department on December 9, 2010. A 

notice was published in the Federal 

Register pursuant to Section 6(b) of the 

Act January 10, 2011 (76 FR 1460). 

Patricia A. Brink, 

Director of Civil Enforcement, Antitrust 

Division. 

[FR Doc. 2011–8366 Filed 4–8–11; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE M 

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE 

Drug Enforcement Administration 

Layfe Robert Anthony, M.D.; Denial of 

Application 

On December 3, 2009, the Deputy 

Assistant Administrator, Office of 

Diversion Control, Drug Enforcement 

Administration, issued an Order to 

Show Cause to Layfe Robert Anthony, 

M.D. (Respondent), of Salt Lake City, 

Utah. The Show Cause Order proposed 

the revocation of Respondent’s DEA 

Certificate of Registration, BA8835449, 

and the denial of any pending 

applications to renew or modify the 

registration, on the ground that because 

of actions taken by the Utah Division of 

Occupational and Professional 

Licensing, he lacks ‘‘authority to 

practice medicine or handle controlled 

substances in the State of Utah,’’ the 

State in which he is registered. Show 

Cause Order at 1 (citing 21 U.S.C. 

824(a)(3)). The Show Cause Order also 

notified Respondent of his right to 

request a hearing or to submit a written 

statement in lieu of a hearing, the 

procedures for doing so, and the 

consequences for his failing to do so. Id. 

at 2 (citing 21 CFR 1301.43 & 1316.47). 

On December 14, 2009, the Show 

Cause Order was served on Respondent 

by certified mail addressed to him at his 

registered location. Since that date, 

more than thirty days have passed and 

neither Respondent, nor anyone 

purporting to represent him, has 

requested a hearing or submitted a 

written statement. 21 CFR 1301.43(b) & 

(c). Accordingly, I conclude that 

Respondent has waived his right to a 

hearing and issue this Final Order based 

on the evidence contained in the 

investigative record. 21 CFR 1301.43(d) 

& (e). 

Respondent held DEA registration, 

BA8835449, which authorized him to 

dispense controlled substances in 

schedules II through V as a practitioner. 

According to the Agency’s registration 

records, Respondent’s registration 

expired on June 30, 2007, and 

Respondent did not submit his renewal 

application until July 2, 2007. Moreover, 

the Agency did not automatically renew 

his registration. 

Under 5 U.S.C. 558(c), ‘‘[w]hen the 

licensee has made timely and sufficient 

application for a renewal or a new 

license in accordance with agency rules, 

a license with reference to an activity of 

a continuing nature does not expire 

until the application has been finally 

determined by the agency.’’ Based on 

this provision, the Government 

maintains that his registration has 

continued in effect.1 It has not. 

However, an application remains 

pending before the Agency. 

On January 28, 2009, the Utah 

Department of Commerce, Division of 

Occupational and Professional 

Licensing (DOPL), revoked his ‘‘licenses 

to practice as a physician/surgeon and 

to administer and prescribe controlled 

substances.’’ Order, In re Layfe Robert 

Anthony, M.D., No. DOPL–OSC–2001– 

70 (Utah Div. Occ. & Prof. Lic. Jan. 28, 

2009).2 Accordingly, Respondent lacks 


srobinson on DSKHWCL6B1PROD with NOTICES