alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Editorial Note on Part 27
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 27 appear by T.D. ATF-474, 67 FR 11231, Mar. 13, 2002, and T.D. ATF-479, 67 FR 30799, May 8, 2002.

§ 27.254 Registration of foreign producer. ( a ) *General.* A foreign producer electing to assign CBMA tax benefits to one or more importers must first register with TTB and receive a Foreign Producer ID.
( b ) *Information required in registration.* A foreign producer must provide the following information through the foreign producer registration and assignment system to register with TTB and receive a Foreign Producer ID: ( 1 ) The name, country of residence, and principal business address of the foreign producer;
( 2 ) The name, title, country of residence, phone number, and email address of an employee or individual owner of the business who has authority to act for the business;
( 3 ) If different than the individual identified in paragraph (b)(2) of this section, the name, address, phone number, and email address of the individual submitting the registration and authorized to act on the foreign producer's behalf;
( 4 ) The Food Facility Registration number(s) obtained from the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) under 21 CFR 1.225 that may be reported to FDA under 21 CFR 1.281(a)(6)(ii) for the purposes of importing into the United States the foreign producer's alcohol products;
( 5 ) Identifying information for the individuals and/or entities with ownership interests in the foreign producer as required by § 27.256, or a certification that § 27.256 does not require the foreign producer to provide such identifying information;
( 6 ) Any prescribed certifications attesting to the authority of the individual submitting the registration and the truthfulness of the information submitted, the acknowledgement by the person submitting the registration that providing erroneous or fraudulent information may cause TTB to revoke the foreign producer's eligibility to assign CBMA tax benefits, and consent to receive electronically any written notice of contemplated revocation;
( 7 ) Any additional information required by the appropriate TTB officer (including, through the foreign producer registration and assignment system) in order to verify a submitter's identity. Such information may include identifying numbers (*e.g.,* Employer Identification Number, Social Security Number) as provided in 26 U.S.C. 6109; and
( 8 ) Any additional information required by the appropriate TTB officer on a case-by-case basis, to administer CBMA.
( c ) *Language.* All registration information must be submitted in the English language except an individual's name, the name of a company, and the name of a street may be submitted in a foreign language. All information, including these items, must be submitted using the English alphabet.
( d ) *Electronic registration required.* The foreign producer must submit the information required by paragraph (b) of this section electronically using the format provided by TTB.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

DAY ELEV

 123.49

 123.38

 124.17

 124.37

 124.49

 124.29

 124.00

 123.60

 123.58

 123.51

 124.15

 124.34

 124.04

 124.23

 124.35

 124.94

 124.87

 124.57

 124.79

 124.10

 124.10

 124.03

 123.86

 123.33

 123.42

 123.64

 123.84

 124.29

 124.65

 124.20

 8,021

 7,970

 8,346

 8,446

 8,506

 8,406

 8,261

 8,073

 8,064

 8,031

 8,336

 8,431

 8,281

 8,376

 8,436

 8,731

 8,696

 8,546

 8,656

 8,311

 8,311

 8,276

 8,195

 7,946

 7,988

 8,092

 8,186

 8,406

 8,586

 8,361

STORAGE

-90

-51

+376

+100

+60

-100

-145

-188

-9

-33

+305

+95

-150

+95

+60

+295

-35

-150

+110

-345

+0

-35

-81

-249

+42

+104

+94

+220

+180

-225

CHANGE

2,026

2,034

2,272

2,126

2,097

2,002

1,987

1,991

2,090

2,074

2,476

2,388

2,261

2,376

2,357

2,471

2,361

2,324

2,380

2,236

2,350

2,252

2,363

2,309

2,411

2,397

2,395

2,457

2,436

2,223

INFLOW

 1,946

 1,946

 1,976

 1,970

 1,961

 1,946

 1,952

 1,972

 1,979

 1,975

 2,206

 2,224

 2,221

 2,215

 2,217

 2,211

 2,268

 2,289

 2,213

 2,298

 2,238

 1,343

 2,287

 2,318

 2,274

 2,227

 2,227

 2,225

 2,225

 2,215

POWER

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 817

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

SPILL

 60

 60

 60

 60

 60

 60

 60

 60

 60

 60

 60

 60

 60

 60

 60

 60

 60

 60

 60

 60

 60

 58

 60

 60

 60

 60

 60

 60

 60

 60

HATCHERY

 1

 2

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 0

 1

 1

 1

 2

 2

 2

 1

 2

 2

 1

 0

 1

 1

 0

 1

C.F.S.

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

NOVEMBER 2005 LAKE NATOMA DAILY OPERATIONS RUN DATE: March 14, 2006

IN LAKE

EVAP

C.F.S.

COMPUTED*

ACRE-FEET

RELEASE - C.F.S.

TOTALS +250 67,922 63,564 817 1,798 33

ACRE-FEET +250 134,723 126,079 1,621 3,566 65

COMMENTS:

* COMPUTED INFLOW IS THE SUM OF CHANGE IN STORAGE, RELEASES AND EVAPORATION.

SUMMARY

RELEASES (ACRE-FEET)

POWER 126,079

SPILL 1,621

FOLSOM SOUTH CANAL

HATCHERY

 3,148

 3,566

 8,111

FOLSOM

SOUTH 

 64

 52

 45

 45

 45

 45

 47

 53

 55

 55

 55

 55

 55

 52

 50

 50

 50

 50

 50

 50

 50

 51

 55

 55

 55

 58

 60

 60

 60

 60

 1,587

 3,148

(1)

(1) INCHES OF EVAPORATION TAKEN FROM FOLSOM PAN.

RELEASES (ACRE-FEET) 

TOTAL 134,414

Table 12
-       - Superintendent of Documents
      - 2023-09-01T18:03:25-0400
      - Government Publishing Office, Washington, DC 20401
      - Government Publishing Office
      - Government Publishing Office attests that this document has not been altered since it was disseminated by Government Publishing Office
#### Eladio RAMOS, Petitioner, v. Alberto R. GONZALES, Attorney General, Respondent.

No. 06-70440.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted July 17, 2006.*

Decided July 21, 2006.

Alejandro Garcia, Esq., City of Commerce, CA, for Petitioner.

CAC-District Counsel, Esq., Office of the District Counsel, Department of Homeland Security, Los Angeles, CA, Ronald E. LeFevre, Chief Counsel, Office *566of the District Counsel, Department of Homeland Security, San Francisco, CA, Eric W. Marsteller, M. Jocelyn Wright, DOJ — U.S. Department of Justice Civil Div./Office of Immigration Lit., Washington, DC, for Respondent.

Before: B. FLETCHER, HAWKINS and THOMAS, Circuit Judges.

*

 This panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. *See*Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

MEMORANDUM **

This is a petition for review of the Board of Immigration Appeal’s January 5, 2006 final order of removal. Petitioner’s motion for an extension of time to file a response to the motion for summary disposition is granted. The Clerk shall file the response received May 26, 2006.

Respondent’s motion for summary disposition is granted because the questions raised by this petition for review are so insubstantial as not to require further argument. *See Armendariz-Montoya v. Sonchik,*291 F.3d 1116, 1121-22 (9th Cir. 2002) (reaffirming prior holding that there is no retroactive effect in applying section 440(d) of the Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act to aliens who elected to go to trial rather than plead guilty); *United States v. Hooton,*693 F.2d 857, 858 (9th Cir.1982) (per curiam) (stating standard for summary disposition). Accordingly, this petition for review is denied.

All other pending motions are denied as moot. The temporary stay of removal shall continue in effect until issuance of the mandate.

PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED.

**

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
|  |  | [if !vml]>[endif]>

You have  reached the Federal Depository Library Program Electronic Collection  (FDLP/EC) Archive. This archive assures ongoing access to publications in the  FDLP/EC. Access to publications in the archive is available through GPO's  suite of cataloging and locator services, including the Catalog of U.S.  Government Publications (CGP).
Title: National      compensation survey. Buffalo-Niagara Falls-Cattaraugus, NY.
 
 
SuDocs Number: L 2.121/32:B 86/
Item    Number: [if !vml]>[endif]> [if !vml]>[endif]>0768-B-32    (online)

System    Number: 000866842
 
 
 
2007
 
2008
 
2009
 
2010
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
A service of the Superintendent of Documents,  U.S. Government Printing Office..

 

Last updated:  April 23, 2020  Page Name:  http://permanent.access.gpo.gov/
perm |
|--|--|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
MEMORANDUM

SUBJECT: Summary of Public Input from a listening - session meeting on March 15, 2011

regarding the Environmental Protection Agency’s Im plementation of Executive Order 13563: Improving Regulation and Regulatory Review FROM: Lawrence Grandison, Director, Office of Communication and Public

Involvement, Region 8 TO: Public Docket EPA - HQ - OA - 2011 - 0163 for Improving Regulations: State,

Local and Tribal governments The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is beginning a new periodic retrospective review of our existing significant regulations, to determine whether any such regulations should be modified, streamlined, expanded, or repealed, so as to make the Agency ’s regulatory

program more effective or less burdensome in achieving the regulatory objectives. As called for b y President Obama in Executive Order 13563 , "to facilitate the periodic review of existing significant regulations," EPA will "consider how best to promote retrospective anal ys is of rules that may be outmoded, ineff ective, insufficient, or excessively burdensome, and to modify , streamline, expand, or repeal them in accordance with what has been learned." As part of this effort , EPA convened public meetings to gather input on how we might design the plan we will us e to periodicall y review our regulations. This Memo transmits to the docket a summary

of the input received from public stakeholders at a meeting with Region 8 Tribal leaders held on March 15, 2011 at the EPA office in Denver

. Regional Administrator Jim Martin w as the primary facilitator for this session . Jim opened with a brief description of the purpose for the session and then began accepting comments which were noted in the document submitted in tandem with this memo . The session lasted approximately 60 minutes. There were no break

- out sessions.
###### Editorial Note on Part 44

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 44 appear by T.D. ATF-464, 66 FR 43480, Aug. 20, 2001, and T.D. ATF-480, 67 FR 30801-30803, May 8, 2002.

#### § 44.203 To noncontiguous foreign countries and possessions of the United States.

Where tobacco products, or cigarette papers or tubes are removed from a factory or an export warehouse for direct delivery to a vessel or aircraft for transportation to a noncontiguous foreign country, Puerto Rico, the Virgin Islands, or a possession of the United States, the manufacturer or export warehouse proprietor making the shipment shall file two copies of the notice of removal, Form 5200.14, with the office of the district director of customs at the port where the shipment is to be laden. Such copies of the notice of removal should be filed with the related shipper's export declaration, Commerce Form 7525-V. In the event the copies of the notice of removal are not filed with the shipper's export declaration, when the copies of the notice are filed with the district director of customs they shall show all particulars necessary to enable that officer to associate the notice with the related shipper's export declaration and any other documents filed with his office in connection with the shipment. After the vessel or aircraft on which the shipment has been laden clears or departs from the port of lading the customs authority shall execute the certificate of exportation on both copies of the notice of removal, retain one copy for his records, and deliver or transmit the other copy to the manufacturer or export warehouse proprietor making the shipment for filing with the appropriate TTB officer.

(72 Stat. 1418, as amended; 26 U.S.C. 5704)

[T.D. 6961, 33 FR 9493, June 28, 1968. Redesignated at 40 FR 16835, Apr. 15, 1975, and amended by T.D. ATF-232, 51 FR 28089, Aug. 5, 1986; T.D. ATF-243, 51 FR 43194, Dec. 1, 1986; T.D. ATF-421, 64 FR 71926, Dec. 22, 1999]
North Cape Oil Spill Restoration

National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration

United States Fish and Wildlife Service

Rhode Island Department of Environmental Management

North Cape Oil Spill 

• January 19, 1996 grounded just offshore RI 

coast

• 828,000 gallons of no. 2 fuel oil spill

• Oil spread throughout Block Island Sound and 

coastal salt ponds

• Heavy wave action drove oil into sediments 

and mixed oil into water column * North Cape

oil spill site

Summary of Injuries Caused by Spill

• 9 million lobsters killed

• 364,000 kg of shellfish

• ~ 1 million kg of benthic macrofauna

• 111,000 kg of fish

• 2,100 seabirds

• 5-10 piping plover chicks

• 3,300 lost party-charter boat trips

• fishing closures

Terms of Settlement with K-Sea Transportation

• Settlement reached in June 2000

• Responsible Party agreed to pay:

•$1.6 million for salt pond land acquisition

•$1.5 million for a multi-species shellfish restoration project

•$3 million to purchase and protect loon nesting habitat

•$400,000 to purchase and protect eider nesting habitat

•$140,000 to manage and protect piping plover nesting habitat

•$160,000 to implement an anadromous fish restoration project

•$800,000 to oversee and monitor the lobster restoration project

• In addition, the RP agreed to implement the lobster restoration project
Key Accomplishments to Date

• Completed purchase of a conservation easement and 

secured permanent protection of 60 acres of land adjacent 

to Ninigret Pond

• Completed the v-notching and protection of 1.248 million 

legal-size female lobsters in Rhode Island Sound

• Completed acquisition and protection of 1.5 million acres 

of land in Maine to protect over 125 loon nesting pair and 

their habitat

•Completed acquisition and protection of a 42 acre island 

off the coast of Maine to protect over 600 nesting pair of 

eider 

• Completed the construction of a fish ladder on Indian 

Lake in South Kingstown opening up 220 acres of 

spawning habitat for alewife

• Increased the number of piping plover nesting pairs on 

Rhode Island’s South County beaches by 38%

•Increased populations of oysters, bay scallops, and 

quahogs in numerous locations in Narragansett Bay and 

the coastal salt ponds.

For more information, contact:

Molly Sperduto, USFW: Molly_Sperduto@fws.gov; 603-223-2541

Mary Kay, DEM: mary.kay@dem.ri.gov; 401-222-6607

John Catena, NOAA: john.catena@noaa.gov; 978-281-9251
NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE REHEARING

MOTION AND, IF FILED, DETERMINED

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

OF FLORIDA

SECOND DISTRICT

JAMES WITT, )

)

Appellant, )

)

v. ) Case No. 2D16-3688

)

STATE OF FLORIDA, )

)

Appellee. )

___________________________________)

Opinion filed June 8, 2018.

Appeal from the Circuit Court for Polk

County; Glenn T. Shelby, Judge.

Howard L. Dimmig, II, Public Defender, 

and Tosha Cohen, Assistant Public 

Defender, Bartow, for Appellant.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General,

Tallahassee, and Susan M. Shanahan, 

Assistant Attorney General, Tampa, 

for Appellee.

SILBERMAN, Judge.

James Witt appeals his sentences for two counts of tampering with a 

witness in a third-degree felony investigation which were imposed after revocation of 

probation. The written sentences designate Witt as a habitual felony offender (HFO) 

and as a violent felony offender of special concern (VFOSC). Witt filed a motion to 
- 2 -

correct sentencing error pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.800(b), and 

the trial court determined that Witt was entitled to a resentencing hearing based on his 

sentence as an HFO and at which time the court would strike costs of prosecution over 

$100. The trial court denied Witt's challenge to his status as a VFOSC. The State 

points out in its brief that the record reflects that Witt withdrew his rule 3.800(b) motion 

in the trial court and that the resentencing hearing was cancelled. Therefore, we affirm 

Witt's sentences imposed after revocation of probation. 

Affirmed.

KELLY and BADALAMENTI, JJ., Concur.
FILED U.S. COURT OF AP P EALS E LEV EN T HC IRC U IT MARCH 27, 2006 THOMAS K. KAH

N CLERK [ DO NO T P UB L I S H] I N THE UN I TE D STATE S C OU RT OF APPE ALS F O R T H E E L E V E N T H C IR C U IT

________________________ N o. 05- 10004 N on -A rgum entC al endar

________________________ D. C . Do c k e tNo . 9 9 - 0 0 2 0 8 - C R - P AS U N I T E D S T A T E S O F A M E R I C A , P la in tif f - A p p e lle e , v ersu s A N D R E D U P R E E C O G D E L L , D e f e n d a n t- A p p e lla n t.

________________________ A pp ea l fr om the U ni t ed S t at es D i stri ctC ou rt f orthe S outhe rn D i s tr i c tof F l or i da

_________________________ ( M ar c h 27, 2006) B efo re T JO F L A T , C A RN E S an d P R Y O R , C i rcu i tJu d g es. P E R C U R I A M: O n M a y 2 3 , 2 0 0 0 , th e d i s tr i c tc o u r ts e n t e n c e d ap p e l l a n tt o p r i s o n t e r ms2

t ot al i ng 42 0 m on ths for c on spi ri ng t o tra ff i ck cocai ne and rel at ed offens es . In a d d itio n to s e n te n c in g ap p e lla n t to p r is o n , th e c o u r t, a s p a r t o f its f in a l ju d g m e n t, forf ei t ed t o the G ov ernm entappel l ant ’ s i nt er es ti n $ 59 , 00 0 the G ov ernm enthad s e iz e d . A p p e lla n t ap p e a le d h is c o n v ic tio n s a n d s e n te n c e s , a n d w e a f f irm e d . U n ite d S ta te s v . C o g d e ll, N o . 0 0 - 1 3 3 2 0 ( D e c e m b e r2 7 , 2 0 0 1 ) ( n o t p u b lis h e d ) . O n O c t obe r15, 2004, appe l l a ntf i l e d a m ot i on f

orr e turn of

pr ope r ty , i . e . , the $59, 000 f

or f e i t e d t o the G ove rnm e nt . T he c our tde ni e d hi s m ot i on. H e now appe a l s thi s rul i ng. W e a f f i r m . A ppe l l a nt ’ s s ol e m e a ns of r e c our s e f

orobt a i ni ng thi s f

or f e i t e d pr ope r ty w a s i n hi s di r e c tappe a l of hi s c onvi c t i ons a nd s e nt e nc e s , nota m ot i on f or th e r e tu rn o f

p r o p e r ty . AF F I RME D.
Editorial Note on Part 30
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 30 appear by T.D. ATF-438, 66 FR 5481, Jan. 19, 2001.

§ 30.21 Requirements. ( a ) *General.* The proof of distilled spirits shall be determined by the use of gauging instruments as prescribed in this part.
( b ) *Proprietors.* Proprietors shall use only accurate hydrometers and thermometers that show subdivisions or graduations of proof and temperature which are at least as delimitated as the instruments described in § 30.22.
( c ) *Appropriate TTB officers.* Appropriate TTB officers shall use only hydrometers and thermometers furnished by the Government. However, where this part requires the use of a specific gravity hydrometer, TTB officers shall use precision grade specific gravity hydrometers conforming to the provisions of § 30.24, furnished by the proprietor. However, the appropriate TTB officer may authorize the use of other instruments approved by the appropriate TTB officer as being equally satisfactory for determination of specific gravity and for gauging. From time to time appropriate TTB officers shall verify the accuracy of hydrometers and thermometers used by proprietors.
(Sec. 201, Pub. L. 85-859, 72 Stat. 1358, as amended (26 U.S.C. 5204))
[T.D. ATF-198, 50 FR 8535, Mar. 1, 1985, as amended by T.D. ATF-438, 66 FR 5481, Jan. 19, 2001]
#### § 24.211 Formula required.

The proprietor who desires to produce wine other than standard wine shall first obtain approval of the formula by which it is to be made, except that no formula is required for distilling material or vinegar stock. The formula is filed as provided by § 24.80. Any change in the formula will be approved in advance as provided by § 24.81.

(Sec. 201, Pub. L. 85-859, 72 Stat. 1387, as amended (26 U.S.C. 5388))

(Approved by the Office of Management and Budget under control number 1512-0059)

[T.D. ATF-299, 55 FR 24989, June 19, 1990, as amended by T.D. ATF-409, 64 FR 13685, Mar. 22, 1999]
###### Editorial Note on Part 479

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 479 appear by T.D. ATF-487, 68 FR 3752, Jan. 24, 2003.

#### § 479.45 Changes in corporation.

Additional special (occupational) tax is not required by reason of a mere change of name or increase in the capital stock of a corporation if the laws of the State of incorporation provide for such change or increase without the formation of a new corporation. A stockholder in a corporation who after its dissolution continues the business, incurs new special (occupational) tax liability.
EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO 
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Chris L. Koliopoulos,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Quarterly Report of Zygo
Corporation on Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarter ended September 30, 2012, as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report), fully
complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in the Report fairly
presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
operations of Zygo Corporation.

A signed original of this
written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Zygo Corporation
and will be retained by Zygo Corporation and furnished to the Securities and
Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

| |                                        | 
| | -------------------------------------- | 
| | Dated: November 9, 2012                | 
| |                                        | 
| | /s/ Chris L. Koliopoulos               | 
| |                                        | 
| | Chris L. Koliopoulos                   | 
| | President and Chief
 Executive Officer
| | of Zygo Corporation                    | 

---