alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 06-1953

TOYIN SARUMI,

Petitioner,

versus

ALBERTO R. GONZALES,

Respondent.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration

Appeals. (A70-306-499)

Submitted: May 16, 2007 Decided: June 25, 2007

Before MICHAEL, MOTZ, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.

Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Alexander N. Agiliga, LAW OFFICES OF ALEXANDER N. AGILIGA, Largo,

Maryland, for Petitioner. Peter D. Keisler, Assistant Attorney

General, Carol Federighi, Senior Litigation Counsel, Gladys M.

Steffens-Guzman, Office of Immigration Litigation, UNITED STATES

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Washington, D.C., for Respondent.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
- 2 -

PER CURIAM:

Toyin Sarumi, a native and citizen of Nigeria, petitions

for review of an order of the Board of Immigration Appeals

(“Board”) dismissing his appeal from the immigration judge’s order

denying his requests for adjustment of status and voluntary

departure and ordering his removal to Nigeria. Because Sarumi

failed to raise any issues pertaining to the propriety of the

denial of his requests for adjustment of status or voluntary

departure in the argument section of his brief, we find that he has

failed to preserve any issues for review. See Fed. R. App. P.

28(a)(9)(A) (“[T]he argument . . . must contain . . . appellant’s

contentions and the reasons for them, with citations to the

authorities and parts of the record on which the appellant

relies.”); Edwards v. City of Goldsboro, 178 F.3d 231, 241 n.6 (4th

Cir. 1999) (“Failure to comply with the specific dictates of [Rule

28] with respect to a particular claim triggers abandonment of that

claim on appeal.”). Accordingly, we deny the petition for review

for the reasons stated by the Board. See In Re: Sarumi, No. A70-

306-499 (B.I.A. Aug. 4, 2006). We dispense with oral argument

because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in

the materials before the court and argument would not aid the

decisional process.

PETITION DENIED
### §1098dd. Use of professional judgment

A financial aid administrator shall be considered to be making a necessary adjustment in accordance with section 1087tt(a) of this title if the administrator makes adjustments with respect to the calculation of the expected student or parent contribution (or both) of an affected individual, and adequately documents the need for the adjustment.

(Pub. L. 108–76, §4, Aug. 18, 2003, 117 Stat. 906.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section was formerly set out in a note under section 1070 of this title.

Section was enacted as part of the Higher Education Relief Opportunities for Students Act of 2003, and not as part of title IV of the Higher Education Act of 1965 which comprises this subchapter.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY ELEV

 123.13

 124.25

 124.16

 123.71

 122.83

 123.03

 122.55

 121.89

 121.07

 121.73

 122.95

 122.31

 122.12

 122.25

 123.53

 122.64

 123.31

 122.90

 123.01

 123.63

 124.66

 123.99

 123.49

 123.31

 123.04

 122.77

 122.23

 122.89

 122.99

 123.89

 124.40

 7,852

 8,386

 8,341

 8,125

 7,715

 7,805

 7,589

 7,295

 6,950

 7,228

 7,769

 7,481

 7,395

 7,454

 8,040

 7,629

 7,937

 7,746

 7,796

 8,087

 8,591

 8,256

 8,021

 7,937

 7,810

 7,688

 7,445

 7,742

 7,787

 8,209

 8,461

STORAGE

+704

+534

-45

-216

-410

+90

-216

-294

-345

+278

+541

-288

-86

+59

+586

-411

+308

-191

+50

+291

+504

-335

-235

-84

-127

-122

-243

+297

+45

+422

+252

CHANGE

3,401

3,298

3,053

2,977

2,887

3,087

2,962

2,941

2,819

3,167

3,827

3,718

3,815

3,854

4,140

3,526

3,981

5,955

8,046

8,232

7,827

6,709

5,906

9,139

15,030

14,871

14,787

13,979

11,289

9,848

8,413

INFLOW

 2,467

 2,468

 2,677

 2,975

 2,993

 2,945

 2,638

 2,450

 2,419

 2,447

 2,435

 2,457

 2,457

 2,429

 2,453

 2,459

 2,503

 2,448

 2,466

 2,478

 2,480

 2,454

 2,452

 3,406

 5,035

 5,028

 5,036

 5,027

 5,015

 5,020

 4,190

POWER

 468

 449

 282

 0

 0

 0

 337

 543

 477

 484

 1,022

 1,309

 1,301

 1,288

 1,285

 1,165

 1,216

 3,495

 5,448

 5,502

 4,988

 4,319

 3,467

 5,670

 9,962

 9,818

 9,787

 8,717

 6,165

 4,519

 3,989

SPILL

 60

 60

 60

 60

 60

 60

 60

 60

 60

 60

 60

 60

 60

 60

 60

 60

 60

 60

 60

 60

 60

 60

 60

 60

 60

 60

 60

 60

 60

 60

 60

HATCHERY

 1

 2

 7

 1

 1

 2

 1

 1

 2

 1

 2

 2

 2

 2

 2

 4

 2

 3

 2

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 2

 2

 2

 0

 1

 1

 2

C.F.S.

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

MARCH 2005 LAKE NATOMA DAILY OPERATIONS RUN DATE: May 12, 2005

IN LAKE

EVAP

C.F.S.

COMPUTED*

ACRE-FEET

RELEASE - C.F.S.

TOTALS **** 197,484 96,207 97,472 1,860 50

ACRE-FEET +1,313 391,710 190,827 193,336 3,689 99

COMMENTS:

* COMPUTED INFLOW IS THE SUM OF CHANGE IN STORAGE, RELEASES AND EVAPORATION.

SUMMARY

RELEASES (ACRE-FEET)

POWER 190,827

SPILL 193,336

FOLSOM SOUTH CANAL

HATCHERY

 2,446

 3,689

 7,148

FOLSOM

SOUTH 

CANAL

 50

 50

 50

 50

 40

 35

 35

 35

 35

 35

 35

 35

 38

 45

 45

 45

 45

 45

 45

 45

 45

 45

 45

 45

 35

 25

 25

 25

 25

 35

 45

 1,233

 2,446

(1)

(1) INCHES OF EVAPORATION TAKEN FROM FOLSOM PAN.

RELEASES (ACRE-FEET)

TOTAL 390,298

Table 12
**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO**

**18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

In connection with the annual report on Form 10-K of Prestige Capital Corporation (the “Registrant”) for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2009, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Whitney O. Cluff, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, of the Registrant, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:

 (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and 

(2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Registrant.

Date:  April  9, 2010

/s/ Whitney O. Cluff

Whitney O. Cluff

Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement, has been furnished to the Registrant and will be retained by the Registrant and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 20-1055

DWIGHT NICHOLS,

 Plaintiff - Appellant,

v.

PROFESSIONAL FORECLOSURE CORPORATION OF VIRGINIA; 

NATIONSTAR MORTGAGE, LLC, d/b/a Mr. Cooper; THE BANK OF NEW 

YORK MELLON TRUST COMPANY, N.A., not in its individual capacity but 

solely as trustee on behalf of the FDIC 2013-R2 Asset Trust; CHICAGO TITLE 

INSURANCE COMPANY,

 Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at 

Norfolk. Arenda L. Wright Allen, District Judge. (2:18-cv-00256-AWA-RJK)

Submitted: April 20, 2021 Decided: April 23, 2021

Before WILKINSON, MOTZ, and THACKER, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Dwight Nichols, Appellant Pro Se. Dennis Kyle Deak, TROUTMAN PEPPER 

HAMILTON SANDERS LLP, Raleigh, North Carolina; Lisa Hudson Kim, KAUFMAN & 

CANOLES, PC, Virginia Beach, Virginia; Lisa Marie Ernest, FIDELITY NATIONAL 

LAW GROUP, Vienna, Virginia, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:

Dwight Nichols appeals the district court’s order dismissing his second amended 

complaint alleging fraud in connection with his mortgage contract as time-barred. We have 

reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Nichols asserts that $150,000 was 

deposited into his bank account in 2006 for a mortgage for which he did not apply. A 

person of ordinary prudence exercising due diligence would have known in 2006 that some 

fraud may have occurred. Thus, Nichols’ complaint, filed in 2018, is barred by Virginia’s 

two-year statute of limitations.*

 See Va. Code Ann. § 8.01-243(A); Schmidt v. Household 

Fin. Corp., 661 S.E. 2d 834, 838-39 (Va. 2008). Accordingly, although we grant leave to 

proceed in forma pauperis, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Nichols v. 

Prof. Foreclosure Corp., No. 2:18-cv-00256-AWA-RJK (E.D. Va. Jan. 3, 2020). We 

dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately 

presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional 

process.

AFFIRMED

* We reject Nichols’ assertion that the district court lacked diversity jurisdiction.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY HIGH

 567

 550

 536

 544

 562

 583

 594

 608

 617

 632

 638

 646

 666

 679

 687

 658

 646

 664

 668

 640

 660

 661

 633

 637

 644

 658

 662

 667

 668

 656

 664

 512

 494

 477

 462

 448

 482

 546

 500

 588

 522

 617

 567

 644

 617

 615

 595

 595

 637

 614

 600

 583

 612

 598

 603

 620

 643

 639

 640

 624

 602

 626

 539

 521

 515

 512

 522

 548

 583

 563

 605

 579

 632

 603

 654

 653

 652

 631

 625

 653

 641

 624

 617

 630

 610

 620

 632

 652

 648

 656

 647

 629

 652

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

MAY 2014 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: June 6, 2014

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

TDS

 349

 338

 334

 332

 339

 355

 376

 364

 390

 374

 407

 389

 420

 420

 419

 406

 402

 420

 412

 402

 397

 405

 393

 399

 407

 419

 416

 421

 416

 405

 419

TOTAL 18,848

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

DELTA MENDOTA CANAL AT CHECK 21
EXHIBIT 32.1

 

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO 

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002*

 

Commission File Number 33-4682

CAPITAL BUILDERS DEVELOPMENT PROPERTIES II,

A CALIFORNIA LIMITED PARTNERSHIP

 

In connection with the Report of Capital Builders Development Properties II (the "Partnership") on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2004, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the "Report"), the undersigned, Michael J. Metzger, President of Capital Builders, Inc., and Kenneth L. Buckler, Chief Financial Officer of Capital Builders, Inc., certify, based on my knowledge, that:

(1) The Report complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and 

(2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Capital Builders Development Properties II.

March 28, 2005

 

___________________________________________

Michael J. Metzger, President

 

____________________________________________

Kenneth L. Buckler, Chief Financial Officer

 

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Partnership and will be retained by the Partnership and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

 

* This certification, required by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, other than as required by Section 906, is deemed to be "filed" with the Commission or subject to the rules and regulations promulgated by the Commission under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, or to the liabilities of Section 18 of said Act.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY ELEV

 1,158.18

 1,158.30

 1,158.44

 1,158.60

 1,158.89

 1,159.27

 1,159.66

 1,160.01

 1,160.37

 1,160.69

 1,160.97

 1,161.22

 1,161.47

 1,161.87

 1,162.28

 1,162.65

 1,162.96

 1,163.23

 1,163.45

 1,163.66

 1,163.85

 1,164.04

 1,164.22

 1,164.40

 1,164.56

 1,164.73

 1,165.04

 1,165.31

 1,165.65

 1,165.92

 1,166.15

 6.01

 6.07

 6.13

 6.21

 6.35

 6.53

 6.72

 6.89

 7.08

 7.24

 7.39

 7.52

 7.65

 7.87

 8.10

 8.30

 8.48

 8.64

 8.76

 8.89

 9.00

 9.12

 9.22

 9.33

 9.43

 9.54

 9.73

 9.90

 10.11

 10.29

 10.44

STORAGE

+0.06

+0.06

+0.07

+0.07

+0.14

+0.18

+0.19

+0.17

+0.18

+0.17

+0.15

+0.13

+0.13

+0.22

+0.23

+0.21

+0.18

+0.16

+0.13

+0.12

+0.11

+0.11

+0.11

+0.11

+0.10

+0.11

+0.19

+0.17

+0.22

+0.17

+0.15

CHANGE

35

31

36

40

74

95

99

91

95

87

78

71

71

112

118

109

94

87

73

69

62

61

58

59

53

57

101

90

113

92

80

INFLOW

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

SPILL

 3

 3

 3

 3

 3

 3

 3

 3

 3

 3

 3

 3

 3

 3

 3

 3

 3

 3

 3

 3

 3

 3

 3

 3

 3

 3

 3

 3

 3

 3

 3

OUTLET

 0

 0

 0

 0

 1

 0

 0

 0

 0

 1

 1

 1

 0

 0

 1

 1

 2

 5

 5

 3

 2

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

C.F.S.

 .02

 .00

 .02

 .03

 .09

 .01

 .01

 .03

 .02

 .05

 .03

 .04

 .02

 .01

 .07

 .06

 .11

 .25

 .26

 .15

 .08

 .07

 .03

 .07

 .03

 .05

 .05

 .03

 .04

 .05

 .04

INCHES

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .07

 .03

 .00

 .08

 .02

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .01

 .00

 .63

 .23

 .01

 .00

 .01

PRECIP

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-ORLAND PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

JANUARY 2021 EAST PARK RESERVOIR DAILY OPERATIONS RUN DATE: 02/09/2021

IN LAKE

EVAPORATION

INCHES

C.F.S.

COMPUTED*

1000 ACRE-FEET

RELEASE - C.F.S.

TOTALS +4.50 2,391 93 0 33 1.82 1.09

ACRE-FEET +4,500 4,743 184 0 65

COMMENTS:

* COMPUTED INFLOW IS THE SUM OF CHANGE IN STORAGE, RELEASES AND EVAPORATION.

DATA BASED ON 24 HOUR PERIOD ENDING 0800 AM.

SUMMARY RELEASE (ACRE-FEET)

SPILL 0

OUTLET

TOTAL

 184

 184

PRECIPITATION

THIS MONTH =

TO DATE =

 1.09

JULY 1, 2020 1.85

 5.95

OCT 1, 2020 TO DATE = 1.81
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 07-6234
RAYMOND CLARKE, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus LEE COUNTY PENITENTIARY; B. G. COMPTON; MEDICAL DEPARTMENT; DAVID ROFF; DOCTOR JESUS, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Roanoke. Glen E. Conrad, District Judge. (7:07-cv-00018-gec) Submitted: April 26, 2007 Decided: May 3, 2007 Before WILLIAMS, MICHAEL, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Raymond Clarke, Appellant Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.- 2 - PER CURIAM: Raymond Clarke appeals the district court’s order dismissing under 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(b) (2000) his complaint filed pursuant to Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Fed. Bureau of Narcotics , 403 U.S. 388 (1971). We have reviewed the record and find that this appeal is frivolous. Accordingly, we deny leave to proceed in forma pauperis and dismiss the appeal for the reasons stated by the district court. Clarke v. Lee County , No. 7:07-cv00018-gec (W.D. Va. Jan. 26, 2007). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
Exhibit 32.2



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 906

OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the quarterly report of Paramco Financial Group, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-QSB for the period ended March 31, 2004 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Terrence Riely, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



(1)

The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)

of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2)

The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.







Date:  January 19, 2005



By:
/s/ Terrence Riely

Terrence Riely

Chief Financial Officer
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.,

 Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Marilyn Kelly

Stephen J. Markman

Diane M. Hathaway

Mary Beth Kelly

Brian K. Zahra, Justices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

 _________________________________________ 

 Clerk

July 25, 2011 

y0718 

Order 

 

July 25, 2011 

141822 

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, 

Plaintiff-Appellee, 

v SC: 141822 

 COA: 292288 

Saginaw CC: 09-032100-FH 

REGINAL LAVAL SHORT, a/k/a 

REGINALD LAVAL SHORT, 

Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/ 

By order of October 29, 2010, we granted leave to appeal the August 26, 2010 

judgment of the Court of Appeals. By order of April 5, 2011, this case was held in 

abeyance pending the decision in Davis v United States, cert gtd, ___ US ___; 131 S Ct 

502; 178 L Ed 2d 368 (2010). On order of the Court, the case having been decided on 

June 16, 2011, Davis v United States, ___ US ___; 131 S Ct 2419; ___ L Ed 2d ___ 

(2011), we VACATE that part of our October 29, 2010 order that granted leave to appeal. 

The application is again considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that 

the question presented should be reviewed by this Court.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
NAVTECH, Inc. and SUBSIDIARIES
EXHIBIT 23
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------


                          INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' CONSENT
                          -----------------------------

     We consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration Statements No.
333-32648,  333-32656  and  333-58756  of Navtech Inc. on Form S-8 of our report
dated  December  19,  2003,  appearing  in this Annual  Report on Form 10-KSB of
Navtech Inc. for the year ended October 31, 2003.

Deloitte & Touche LLP
Kitchener, Ontario
Canada
January 20, 2004


<PAGE>
---



##### 



Whereas
  1.
    
    The parties acknowledge that, as of December 31, 2010, Party B shall pay Party A a total
sales amount of RMB 12,170,074.30 for distributing the software products and services of Party
A.2.
    
    Aging analysis of accounts, in RMB ten thousand Yuan:
 2010.12.31Balance ofAccounts
    
    2010
    
    
    2009
    
    
    2008
    
    
    2007Receivable
    
    Within 1 year
    
    
    1-2 years
    
    
    2-3 years
    
    
    Over 3 years1,217
    
    
    0
    
    
    
    221
    
    
    
    723
    
    
    
    273
    Article 1 Representations, Warranties and Undertakings




---



##### 



Article 2 Debt Repayment Scheme
       Less than 1
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    More than 3Account Age
    
    Year
    
    
    1-2 Years
    
    
    2-3 Years
    
    
    YearsAccount Receivable
Balance
    
    
    0
    
    
    
    221
    
    
    
    723
    
    
    
    273Waive Percentage
    
    
    0
    %
    
    
    0
    %
    
    
    83.5
    %
    
    
    100
    %Waive Amount
    
    
    0
    
    
    
    0
    
    
    
    604
    
    
    
    273
  (1)
    
    Party B shall pay off RMB 1,700,000 prior to December 31, 2011.(2)
    
    Party B shall pay off the remaining RMB 1,700,000 prior to December 31, 2012.




---



##### 



Article 3 Liabilities for Breach of Contract
  Article 4 Modification, Change and Interpretation of this Agreement
  Article 5 Applicable Law
  Article 6 Settlement of Disputes
   Article 7 Effectiveness of Agreement
  Article 8 Miscellaneous
 1.
    
    Both parties have read all clauses of this Agreement and its annexes, and have been fully
aware of and adequately understood the meanings and corresponding legal consequences of this
Agreement and its annexes.
 2.
    
    Should any provision of this Agreement be declared invalid, such invalidity shall not affect
the validity of the remaining provisions of this Agreement.




---



##### 



3.
    
    The headings used herein are for reference purpose only and shall not affect the construction
or interpretation of this Agreement in any way. The time expressed in days herein all refer to
calendar day.
 4.
    
    For any matter not mentioned herein, the parties may sign a supplementary agreement, which
will also constitute an integral part of this Agreement. The annexes and supplementary
agreement shall have the same legal force as this Agreement.
 5.
    
    This Agreement is made in two originals, one for each party, and the originals shall be
equally authentic.
  Party A: Beijing Ninetowns Ports Software and Technology Co., Ltd. (seal)




---



##### 



Party B: Beijing Ninetowns Zhi Fang Software and Technology Co., Ltd. (seal)
November 2023

STORAGE COMPUTED* RELEASE - C.F.S. EVAPORATION

ACRE-FEET INFLOW RIVER JUDGE (2)

DAY ELEV IN LAKE CHANGE C.F.S. POWER SPILL OUTLET

(1)

FRANCIS CARR

POWER PLANT C. F. S. INCHES

13.595

1 1,900.53 13.565 -30 954 0 296 0 673 0 0.00

2 1,900.64 13.646 81 711 0 301 0 366 3 0.12

3 1,900.75 13.727 81 664 0 298 0 325 0 0.00

4 1,900.91 13.845 118 711 0 298 0 353 1 0.04

5 1,900.89 13.830 -15 702 0 301 0 408 1 0.04

6 1,900.99 13.904 74 757 0 298 0 422 0 0.01

7 1,900.80 13.764 -140 554 0 297 0 328 0 0.00

8 1,900.81 13.771 7 771 0 292 0 472 3 0.13

9 1,900.76 13.734 -37 641 0 291 0 369 0 0.01

10 1,900.64 13.646 -88 668 0 291 0 421 0 0.00

11 1,900.62 13.631 -15 656 0 293 0 371 0 0.00

12 1,900.74 13.720 89 714 0 292 0 376 1 0.06

13 1,900.98 13.896 176 712 0 293 0 329 1 0.04

14 1,901.02 13.926 30 682 0 292 0 373 2 0.07

15 1,900.99 13.904 -22 301 0 285 0 27 0 0.00

16 1,900.95 13.874 -30 311 0 300 0 25 1 0.04

17 1,901.13 14.008 134 406 0 312 0 25 1 0.04

18 1,901.12 14.001 -7 333 0 312 0 25 0 0.02

19 1,901.17 14.038 37 555 0 306 0 229 1 0.04

20 1,901.21 14.068 30 573 0 308 0 248 2 0.07

21 1,901.17 14.038 -30 513 0 308 0 219 1 0.05

22 1,901.15 14.023 -15 523 0 306 0 224 1 0.03

23 1,901.04 13.941 -82 491 0 304 0 228 0 0.00

24 1,901.15 14.023 82 558 0 303 0 214 0 0.00

25 1,900.80 13.764 -259 392 0 300 0 223 0 0.00

26 1,900.61 13.624 -140 479 0 295 0 255 0 0.00

27 1,900.91 13.845 221 446 0 307 0 28 0 0.00

28 1,901.20 14.061 216 439 0 302 0 28 0 0.00

29 1,900.33 13.418 -643 13 0 299 0 33 5 0.22

30 1,901.30 14.135 717 695 0 302 0 27 5 0.22

TOTALS 540 16,925 0 8,982 0 7,644 29 1.25

ACRE-FEET 540 33,571 0 17,816 0 15,162 58

* COMPUTED INFLOW IS THE SUM OF CHANGE IN STORAGE, RELEASES, PUMPING AND EVAPORATION

(1) OUTLET RELEASE INCLUDES FISH RELEASE. (2) INCHES OF EVAPORATION TAKEN FROM PAN AT TRINITY RIVER HATCHERY

SUMMARY

Release (ACRE-FEET)

Total Power 0 Judge Francis Carr Powerplant 15,162

Total River 17,816 Total Release 32,978

Historical Archive and Report Database

Lewiston Lake Daily Operations

Run Date: 12/10/2023