alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

DAY ELEV

 1,901.35

 1,901.31

 1,901.09

 1,901.11

 1,900.72

 1,900.87

 1,901.29

 1,901.31

 1,901.38

 1,900.85

 1,900.69

 1,900.67

 1,901.02

 1,900.80

 1,901.12

 1,901.04

 1,901.64

 1,901.14

 1,900.85

 1,900.95

 1,901.20

 1,901.26

 1,901.34

 1,900.56

 1,901.37

 1,901.33

 1,900.82

 1,901.03

 1,901.10

 1,901.26

 14,173

 14,143

 13,978

 13,993

 13,705

 13,815

 14,128

 14,143

 14,195

 13,801

 13,683

 13,668

 13,926

 13,764

 14,001

 13,941

 14,390

 14,016

 13,801

 13,874

 14,061

 14,105

 14,165

 13,587

 14,188

 14,158

 13,779

 13,933

 13,986

 14,105

STORAGE

+45

-30

-165

+15

-288

+110

+313

+15

+52

-394

-118

-15

+258

-162

+237

-60

+449

-374

-215

+73

+187

+44

+60

-578

+601

-30

-379

+154

+53

+119

CHANGE

3,147

2,941

3,052

3,250

3,271

3,243

3,413

3,157

591

486

778

803

960

1,059

419

271

526

126

192

353

1,264

1,191

1,240

1,089

1,464

1,248

2,940

3,205

3,094

3,170

INFLOW

 80

 80

 80

 80

 80

 80

 80

 80

 80

 80

 80

 80

 80

 80

 80

 80

 80

 80

 80

 80

 80

 80

 80

 80

 80

 80

 80

 80

 80

 80

POWER

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 50

 50

 50

 50

 50

 50

 50

 50

 50

 50

 50

 50

 50

 50

 50

 50

 50

 50

 50

 50

 50

SPILL

 220

 220

 220

 220

 220

 220

 220

 220

 220

 170

 170

 170

 170

 170

 170

 170

 170

 170

 170

 170

 170

 170

 170

 170

 170

 170

 170

 170

 170

 170

OUTLETS

 4

 5

 4

 5

 5

 4

 4

 5

 3

 3

 4

 3

 0

 1

 0

 1

 0

 1

 0

 2

 4

 5

 4

 4

 3

 4

 4

 0

 4

 4

C.F.S.

 .17

 .22

 .18

 .22

 .21

 .20

 .17

 .22

 .12

 .16

 .18

 .15

 .14

 .05

 .00

 .04

 .00

 .05

 .00

 .07

 .17

 .21

 .18

 .19

 .15

 .20

 .18

 .11

 .19

 .18

INCHES

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

APRIL 2000 LEWISTON LAKE DAILY OPERATIONS RUN DATE: May 2, 2000

IN LAKE

EVAPORATION

C.F.S. FRANCIS CARR

COMPUTED*

ACRE-FEET

RELEASE - C.F.S. 

TOTALS -23 51,943 2,400 5,550 1,050 90 4.31

ACRE-FEET -23 103,029 4,760 11,008 2,083 179

* COMPUTED INFLOW IS THE SUM OF CHANGE IN STORAGE, RELEASES AND EVAPORATION.

(1) OUTLET RELEASE INCLUDES THE CONTINUOUS FISH RELEASE OF 75 C.F.S.

(2) INCHES OF EVAPORATION TAKEN FROM PAN AT TRINITY RIVER HATCHERY

SUMMARY

RELEASE (ACRE-FEET)

TOTAL POWER 4,760

TOTAL RIVER 17,851 102,872

 14,128

 85,021

RIVER

JUDGE FRANCIS CARR POWERPLANT

TOTAL RELEASE

JUDGE (2)

(1) POWERPLANT

 2,820

 2,651

 2,831

 2,937

 3,111

 2,884

 2,951

 2,844

 262

 382

 533

 508

 530

 840

 0

 0

 0

 14

 0

 14

 866

 864

 906

 1,076

 858

 959

 2,827

 2,827

 2,763

 2,806

 42,864

 85,021

Table 6
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY ELEV

 124.10

 124.30

 124.13

 124.21

 124.46

 122.83

 124.04

 123.98

 123.68

 123.83

 123.85

 123.76

 124.03

 123.02

 124.15

 123.63

 123.78

 123.40

 123.77

 124.09

 124.44

 124.73

 124.44

 124.25

 123.58

 123.99

 123.84

 124.10

 123.71

 123.94

 123.55

 8,311

 8,411

 8,326

 8,366

 8,491

 7,715

 8,281

 8,252

 8,111

 8,181

 8,191

 8,148

 8,276

 7,800

 8,336

 8,087

 8,158

 7,979

 8,153

 8,306

 8,481

 8,626

 8,481

 8,386

 8,064

 8,256

 8,186

 8,311

 8,125

 8,233

 8,050

STORAGE

+10

+100

-85

+40

+125

-776

+566

-29

-141

+70

+10

-43

+128

-476

+536

-249

+71

-179

+174

+153

+175

+145

-145

-95

-322

+192

-70

+125

-186

+108

-183

CHANGE

4,030

4,098

4,029

4,145

4,207

3,779

4,452

4,159

4,100

4,207

4,175

4,149

4,231

3,925

4,441

4,049

4,180

4,009

4,183

4,145

4,135

4,124

3,539

3,501

3,382

3,642

3,084

3,099

2,945

3,093

2,489

INFLOW

 3,918

 3,941

 3,965

 4,019

 4,042

 4,070

 4,067

 4,073

 4,070

 4,071

 4,070

 4,073

 4,074

 4,068

 4,068

 4,068

 4,038

 3,993

 3,989

 2,998

 3,941

 3,945

 3,506

 3,447

 3,443

 3,443

 3,021

 2,940

 2,943

 2,943

 2,485

POWER

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 964

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

SPILL

 60

 60

 60

 60

 60

 60

 60

 60

 60

 60

 60

 60

 60

 60

 60

 60

 60

 60

 60

 60

 60

 60

 60

 60

 60

 60

 60

 60

 60

 60

 60

HATCHERY

 2

 2

 2

 1

 0

 0

 0

 1

 1

 1

 0

 3

 2

 1

 1

 2

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 2

 2

 1

 2

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

C.F.S.

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

OCTOBER 2011 LAKE NATOMA DAILY OPERATIONS RUN DATE: November 1, 2011

IN LAKE

EVAP

C.F.S.

COMPUTED*

ACRE-FEET

RELEASE - C.F.S.

TOTALS -251 119,726 115,732 964 1,860 37

ACRE-FEET -251 237,477 229,554 1,912 3,689 73

COMMENTS:

* COMPUTED INFLOW IS THE SUM OF CHANGE IN STORAGE, RELEASES AND EVAPORATION.

SUMMARY

RELEASES (ACRE-FEET)

POWER 229,554

SPILL 1,912

FOLSOM SOUTH CANAL

HATCHERY

 2,501

 3,689

 8,301

FOLSOM

SOUTH 

CANAL

 45

 45

 45

 45

 42

 40

 40

 40

 40

 40

 40

 35

 30

 36

 42

 45

 45

 45

 45

 45

 45

 45

 44

 40

 40

 40

 37

 35

 35

 35

 35

 1,261

 2,501

(1)

(1) INCHES OF EVAPORATION TAKEN FROM FOLSOM PAN.

RELEASES (ACRE-FEET)

TOTAL 237,656
§ 361.300 What is the one-stop delivery system? ( a ) The one-stop delivery system brings together workforce development, educational, and other human resource services in a seamless customer-focused service delivery network that enhances access to the programs' services and improves long-term employment outcomes for individuals receiving assistance. One-stop partners administer separately funded programs as a set of integrated streamlined services to customers.
( b ) Title I of the Workforce Innovation and Opportunity Act (WIOA) assigns responsibilities at the local, State, and Federal level to ensure the creation and maintenance of a one-stop delivery system that enhances the range and quality of education and workforce development services that employers and individual customers can access.
( c ) The system must include at least one comprehensive physical center in each local area as described in § 361.305.
( d ) The system may also have additional arrangements to supplement the comprehensive center. These arrangements include: ( 1 ) An affiliated site or a network of affiliated sites, where one or more partners make programs, services, and activities available, as described in § 361.310;
( 2 ) A network of eligible one-stop partners, as described in §§ 361.400 through 361.410, through which each partner provides one or more of the programs, services, and activities that are linked, physically or technologically, to an affiliated site or access point that assures customers are provided information on the availability of career services, as well as other program services and activities, regardless of where they initially enter the public workforce system in the local area; and
( 3 ) Specialized centers that address specific needs, including those of dislocated workers, youth, or key industry sectors, or clusters.
( e ) Required one-stop partner programs must provide access to programs, services, and activities through electronic means if applicable and practicable. This is in addition to providing access to services through the mandatory comprehensive physical one-stop center and any affiliated sites or specialized centers. The provision of programs and services by electronic methods such as Web sites, telephones, or other means must improve the efficiency, coordination, and quality of one-stop partner services. Electronic delivery must not replace access to such services at a comprehensive one-stop center or be a substitute to making services available at an affiliated site if the partner is participating in an affiliated site. Electronic delivery systems must be in compliance with the nondiscrimination and equal opportunity provisions of WIOA sec. 188 and its implementing regulations at 29 CFR part 38.
( f ) The design of the local area's one-stop delivery system must be described in the Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) executed with the one-stop partners, described in § 361.500.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY ELEV

 584.69

 584.85

 584.76

 585.58

 585.44

 584.88

 586.40

 586.10

 585.26

 585.42

 585.53

 585.08

 585.30

 585.24

 585.10

 585.61

 585.41

 586.08

 586.19

 584.93

 584.61

 584.61

 585.46

 585.67

 583.95

 585.27

 584.52

 583.01

 582.42

 583.66

 583.74

 22,316

 22,414

 22,359

 22,871

 22,783

 22,433

 23,390

 23,199

 22,670

 22,771

 22,840

 22,557

 22,695

 22,658

 22,570

 22,890

 22,764

 23,186

 23,256

 22,464

 22,266

 22,266

 22,796

 22,928

 21,860

 22,677

 22,211

 21,289

 20,937

 21,684

 21,732

STORAGE

+657

+98

-55

+512

-88

-350

+957

-191

-529

+101

+69

-283

+138

-37

-88

+320

-126

+422

+70

-792

-198

+0

+530

+132

-1,068

+817

-466

-922

-352

+747

+48

CHANGE

7,762

7,557

7,484

7,821

7,543

7,421

8,074

7,501

7,319

7,654

7,597

7,276

7,573

8,352

8,533

8,764

8,426

8,767

8,326

8,095

8,400

8,469

8,723

8,545

8,652

10,273

10,685

11,822

14,215

15,205

14,692

INFLOW

 7,338

 7,420

 7,422

 7,473

 7,496

 7,509

 7,501

 7,504

 7,497

 7,518

 7,476

 7,332

 7,416

 8,275

 8,489

 8,512

 8,400

 8,468

 8,202

 8,408

 8,410

 8,379

 8,368

 8,387

 9,103

 9,774

 10,834

 12,201

 14,304

 13,707

 14,578

POWER

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 1,033

 0

SPILL

 85

 85

 85

 85

 85

 85

 85

 85

 85

 85

 85

 85

 85

 85

 85

 85

 85

 85

 85

 85

 85

 85

 85

 85

 85

 85

 85

 85

 85

 85

 85

FISHTRAP

 8

 3

 5

 5

 6

 3

 6

 8

 4

 0

 1

 2

 2

 11

 3

 6

 5

 1

 4

 1

 5

 5

 3

 6

 2

 2

 1

 1

 3

 3

 5

C.F.S.

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

MAY 2010 KESWICK RESERVOIR DAILY OPERATIONS RUN DATE: June 1, 2010

RES.

EVAP

C.F.S.

COMPUTED*

ACRE-FEET

RELEASE - C.F.S. 

TOTALS +73 277,526 273,701 1,033 2,635 120

ACRE-FEET +73 550,473 542,886 2,049 5,227 238

SUMMARY

RELEASE (ACRE-FEET)

POWER 542,886

SPILL 2,049

 21,659

FISH TRAP 5,227

SPRING

CR. P. P.

RELEASE (1)

 50

 50

 50

 566

 780

 50

 50

 50

 50

 51

 271

 459

 460

 459

 275

 266

 472

 466

 432

 474

 471

 264

 47

 47

 72

 83

 348

 232

 288

 47

 82

 7,762

 15,396

*COMPUTED INFLOW IS SUM OF CHANGE IN STORAGE, RELEASES, AND EVAPORATION.

(1) EVAPORATION RECORDS TAKEN FROM SHASTA PAN.

SHASTA

RELEASE

C.F.S

 7,121

 7,038

 6,854

 6,359

 6,025

 6,829

 7,386

 6,909

 6,625

 6,948

 6,633

 6,241

 6,396

 7,115

 7,737

 7,975

 7,500

 7,195

 7,256

 6,802

 7,250

 7,923

 8,224

 8,011

 8,187

 9,827

 9,554

 10,888

 13,644

 14,591

 14,367

 251,410

 498,672
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

DAY ELEV

 989.74

 990.03

 990.29

 990.50

 990.65

 990.84

 991.02

 991.10

 991.10

 991.29

 991.49

 991.53

 991.61

 991.62

 991.83

 992.09

 992.20

 992.72

 993.05

 993.46

 993.71

 993.99

 993.93

 994.18

 994.60

 995.52

 996.02

 996.45

 996.80

 1,378.8

 1,381.4

 1,383.7

 1,385.5

 1,386.9

 1,388.5

 1,390.1

 1,390.8

 1,390.8

 1,392.5

 1,394.3

 1,394.7

 1,395.4

 1,395.5

 1,397.3

 1,399.6

 1,400.6

 1,405.3

 1,408.2

 1,411.9

 1,414.1

 1,416.6

 1,416.1

 1,418.3

 1,422.1

 1,430.4

 1,434.9

 1,438.8

 1,442.0

STORAGE

+1.7

+2.6

+2.3

+1.9

+1.3

+1.7

+1.6

+0.7

+0.0

+1.7

+1.8

+0.4

+0.7

+0.1

+1.9

+2.3

+1.0

+4.6

+2.9

+3.7

+2.2

+2.5

-0.5

+2.2

+3.8

+8.3

+4.5

+3.9

+3.2

CHANGE

861

1,300

1,186

1,108

1,008

864

847

845

933

865

940

821

903

716

978

1,201

1,784

2,384

1,505

1,894

1,142

1,281

1,034

1,274

1,994

4,202

2,325

2,003

1,616

INFLOW

 0

 0

 0

 71

 325

 0

 23

 470

 916

 0

 7

 613

 519

 660

 0

 6

 1,275

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 1,299

 122

 74

 0

 3

 10

 0

POWER

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

SPILL

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

OUTLET

 17

 11

 26

 100

 14

 17

 20

 17

 17

 14

 37

 29

 26

 12

 37

 29

 14

 46

 20

 43

 14

 17

 6

 20

 17

 23

 47

 29

 18

C.F.S.

 .06

 .04

 .09

 .35

 .05

 .06

 .07

 .06

 .06

 .05

 .13

 .10

 .09

 .04

 .13

 .10

 .05

 .16

 .07

 .15

 .05

 .06

 .02

 .07

 .06

 .08

 .16

 .10

 .06

INCHES

 .00

 .02

 .96

 .15

 .00

 .00

 .09

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .20

 .44

 .97

 .23

 .00

 .04

 .12

 .08

 .04

 .25

 1.58

 .39

 .05

 .00

PRECIP

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

FEBRUARY 2004 NEW MELONES LAKE DAILY OPERATIONS RUN DATE: March 29, 2004

IN LAKE

EVAPORATION

INCHES

C.F.S.

COMPUTED*

1000 ACRE-FEET

RELEASE - C.F.S.

TOTALS +65.0 39,814 6,393 0 0 737 2.57 5.61

ACRE-FEET +65,000 78,971 12,681 0 0 1,462

COMMENTS:

* COMPUTED INFLOW IS THE SUM OF CHANGE IN STORAGE, RELEASES AND EVAPORATION.

SUMMARY

RELEASE (ACRE-FEET)

POWER 12,681

SPILL 0

OUTLET

TOTAL

 0

 12,681

PRECIPITATION

THIS MONTH =

TO DATE =

 5.61

JULY 1, 2003 18.73

 1,377.1

Table 13
### subpart 1—state role

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Subpart 1 of part H of title IV of the Higher Education Act of 1965, comprising this subpart, was originally added to Pub. L. 89–329, title IV, by Pub. L. 102–325, title IV, §499, July 23, 1992, 106 Stat. 635, and amended by Pub. L. 103–208, Dec. 20, 1993, 107 Stat. 2457. Subpart 1 is shown herein, however, as having been added by Pub. L. 105–244, title IV, §491(2), Oct. 7, 1998, 112 Stat. 1759, without reference to those intervening amendments because of the extensive revision of subpart 1 by Pub. L. 105–244.
#### Benjamin M. Iliffe, Respondent, v. Max Poellath, Appellant.

Order affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements. Ho opinion. Jenks, P. J., Burr, Thomas, Carr and Putnam, JJ., concurred.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

DAY HIGH

 223

 220

 225

 222

 222

 226

 228

 225

 231

 233

 241

 239

 237

 257

 248

 280

 258

 262

 253

 245

 245

 240

 236

 230

 233

 234

 238

 239

 210

 210

 211

 212

 213

 214

 215

 216

 217

 221

 224

 227

 229

 230

 231

 230

 231

 232

 232

 232

 229

 225

 224

 221

 218

 217

 220

 223

 214

 213

 215

 216

 216

 218

 219

 220

 223

 226

 229

 231

 232

 236

 236

 242

 240

 240

 239

 236

 236

 231

 229

 225

 224

 222

 226

 230

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

FEBRUARY 2011 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: March 30, 2011

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

14 DAY

ACCUM

MEAN

14 DAY

AVG

MEAN

 2,870

 2,887

 2,905

 2,923

 2,939

 2,956

 2,972

 2,988

 3,005

 3,023

 3,043

 3,063

 3,083

 3,108

 3,130

 3,159

 3,184

 3,208

 3,231

 3,249

 3,266

 3,277

 3,283

 3,282

 3,277

 3,268

 3,262

 3,256

 205

 206

 208

 209

 210

 211

 212

 213

 215

 216

 217

 219

 220

 222

 224

 226

 227

 229

 231

 232

 233

 234

 235

 234

 234

 233

 233

 233

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

JERSEY POINT TOP ON THE SAN JOAQUIN RIVER
§ 31.192 Photographic copies of records. ( a ) *General.* Dealers may record, copy, or reproduce records required by this part. Dealers may use any process that accurately reproduces the original record and that forms a durable medium for preserving the original record.
( b ) *Copies of records treated as original records.* Whenever records are reproduced under this section, the reproduced records must be preserved in conveniently accessible files, and provision must be made for examining, viewing, and using the reproduced record in the same manner as if it were the original record. A reproduced record will be treated and considered for all purposes as though it were the original record. All provisions of law and regulations applicable to the original record are applicable to the reproduced record. As used in this section, “original record” means the record required by this part to be maintained or preserved by a dealer, even though it may be an executed duplicate or other copy of the document.
(26 U.S.C. 5555)
(No. 73—CC—35

#### Information Design, Inc., Claimant, *vs.*State of Illinois, Secretary of State, Respondent.

*Opinion filed April 16, 1973.*

Information Design, Inc., Claimant, pro se.

William J. Scott, Attorney General; William E. Webber, Assistant Attorney General, for Respondent.

Per Curiam.
NO. 07-07 -046 0-CV IN THE CO UR T OF APPEA LS FO R THE S EVEN TH D ISTRI CT O F TEXAS

AT AM AR ILLO PAN EL A DE CE MB ER7, 2007

_________

_________

_________

____ IN R E GE RN OR RI S W AY NE D IX ON

_________

_________

_________

____ Before CAMPBE LL a nd HANCOCK an d PIRT LE, JJ. ME MO RA ND UM OPI NI ON Rel ator , G er nor ri s W a yne D ixon, fil ed hi s A ppl ic ati on for W ri t of M andamus on Nov ember

9, 2007 c ontendi ng thatthe tr ial co urt de n ie d h im t he oppo rt uni ty to present evidence o f

allegations of

p rosecu torial misco ndu ct and in ef fective assistance of

coun sel. Fur ther , D ixon c ontends that the tr ial cour t faile d to is sue a findi ng of facts and c oncl usi ons of law i n the deni al of hi s “ Fi rs t W ri t of H abeas C or pus. ” H ow ev er , D ixon di d noti ncl ude in an appendix

to his appli cat ion a “c erti fied or sw or n c opy of any order co mplai ned of, or a n y o t h e r docu me nt sho w ing the ma tter com plaine d of .” T EX . R. A PP . P. 5 2. 3( j ) ( A). Therefore, i t i s u nknow n w hether the tr ial co urt was aw are of Di x on’ s req uest s. Addi ti onal ly , Di x on did not pay the fili ng fee req uired under Rul e 5 of th e T e xas R u l e s o f A p p e ll a t e P ro c e d u re . By l e t t e r f ro m t h is Co u rtd a t e d No ve m b e r 1 3 , 2 0 0 7 , we adv is ed D ixon th at t he “ fili ng fee in the amo u n t o f $ 1 25.00 did not acc ompany the2

capt ion ed or ig ina l p ro ceedi ng . Unl ess the fili ng fee is pai d by M onday , N ov ember

26, 200 7, th is proceed ing w ill be su bject to dismissal.” T EX . R. A PP . P. 5. D ix on h as no t paid the fee as di re cte d nor

has he fil ed an aff ida v itof ind ig ence. Se e T EX . R. A PP . P. 2 0.1. Acc ordin g ly , w e deny D ixon’ s p eti ti on. Se e In re C hav ez , 62 S.W .3d 2 25 (Te x .Ap p.–Am arillo 2001 , orig. proce edin g)

.

Mackey K. Hancock Justice
[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 10 (Friday, January 14, 2011)]
[Notices]
[Page 2709]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2011-764]



[[Page 2709]]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF LABOR

Employment and Training Administration

[TA-W-74,280]


Whirlpool Corporation, Benton Harbor Division, Including On-Site 
Leased Workers of Aerotek and Penske Logistics, LLC, Benton Harbor, MI; 
Amended Certification Regarding Eligibility To Apply for Worker 
Adjustment Assistance

    In accordance with Section 223 of the Trade Act of 1974, as amended 
(``Act''), 19 U.S.C. 2273, the Department of Labor issued a 
Certification of Eligibility to Apply for Worker Adjustment Assistance 
on September 14, 2010, applicable to workers of Whirlpool Corporation, 
Benton Harbor Division, Benton Harbor, Michigan, including on-site 
leased workers from Aerotek, Benton Harbor, Michigan. The Department's 
notice of determination was published in the Federal Register on 
September 29, 2010 (75 FR 60143).
    At the request of the petitioners, the Department reviewed the 
certification for workers of the subject firm. The workers were engaged 
in activities related to the production of machined and plated 
component parts utilized in laundry equipment.
    The company reports that workers leased from Penske Logistics, LLC, 
were employed on-site at the Benton Harbor, Michigan location of 
Whirlpool Corporation, Benton Harbor Division. The Department has 
determined that these workers were sufficiently under the control of 
the subject firm to be considered leased workers.
    Based on these findings, the Department is amending this 
certification to include workers leased from Penske Logistics, LLC 
working on-site at the Benton Harbor, Michigan location of Whirlpool 
Corporation, Benton Harbor Division.
    The amended notice applicable to TA-W-74,280 is hereby issued as 
follows:

    All workers of Whirlpool Corporation, Benton Harbor Division, 
including on-site leased workers from Aerotek and Penske Logistics, 
LLC, Benton Harbor, Michigan, who became totally or partially 
separated from employment on or after June 18, 2009, through 
September 14, 2012, and all workers in the group threatened with 
total or partial separation from employment on the date of 
certification through two years from the date of certification, are 
eligible to apply for adjustment assistance under Chapter 2 of Title 
II of the Trade Act of 1974, as amended.

    Signed in Washington, DC, this 17th day of December 2010.
Del Min Amy Chen,
Certifying Officer, Office of Trade Adjustment Assistance.
[FR Doc. 2011-764 Filed 1-13-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510-FN-P