alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
TAUBER & BALSER, P.C.
                          Certified Public Accountants
                           3340 Peachtree Road, N.E.
                                   Suite 250
                               Atlanta, GA  30326





          CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT CERTIFIED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS


We consent to the incorporation by reference of our report dated April 14, 1999
included in the December 31, 1998 Form 10-KSB/A for HALIS, Inc. into its
previously filed Registration Statements No. 33-22588 on Form S-8 dated June 16,
1988, No. 33-22591 on Form S-8 dated June 16, 1988, No. 33-38257 on Form S-8
dated December 19, 1990, No. 33-38258 on Form S-8 dated December 19, 1990, No.
33-53702 on Form S-8 dated October 20, 1992, and No. 33-53704 on Form S-8
dated October 20, 1992.





/s/ Tauber & Balser, P.C.
TAUBER & BALSER, P.C.
Atlanta, Georgia
May 6, 1999
EFFECTIVE DATE: 08/11/2010 EXPIRATION DATE: 03/31/2012 

PROCEDURE INSTRUCTION LETTER NO. I10-V-11 

FROM: NEAL H. MERRIFIELD

Acting Administrator for 

Metal and Nonmetal Mine Safety and Health 

SUBJECT: Procedures for Informing State Agencies When Dams are No Longer 

Subject to MSHA Jurisdiction. 

Scope

This Procedure Instruction Letter (PIL) applies to all Metal and Nonmetal Mine Safety 

and Health enforcement personnel. 

Purpose

The purpose of this PIL is to establish uniform procedures for Metal and Nonmetal Mine Safety 

and Health enforcement personnel to notify the appropriate state agencies when dams are no 

longer subject to MSHA jurisdiction. This notification should be made from the district office 

through registered mail with a copy of the letter forwarded to the Chief of Safety for Metal and 

Nonmetal.

Procedure Instruction

An orphaned dam is one for which there is no responsible mine operator accountable for the 

dam. Typically, this classification occurs when mining or milling operations cease and the mine 

is placed in “permanently abandoned” status so mandated inspections are not required to be 

conducted. 

When the status of a dam listed in MSHA’s Standardized Information Systems (MSIS) database 

is designated as orphaned due to a mine or mill’s cessation of operations, the field office 

supervisor will immediately notify the district office. The district office will notify the state 

agency which has jurisdiction over the dam of MSHA’s intent to discontinue inspections of the 

mine, including its dam(s). A record of this notification will be maintained at the district office. 

If no state agency can be identified, then the Chief of Safety for Metal and Nonmetal will be 

notified of this event in writing. The Chief of Safety for Metal and Nonmetal will notify the 

governor of the state where the dam resides of its orphan status in writing. 

Background

This PIL provides guidance to document the efficient transfer of these potentially hazardous 

dams to the appropriate agency. 
2

Authority

The Federal Mine Safety and Health Act of 1977, (as amended) Section 103(a), 30 U.S.C. § 801 

et seq. at § 813 (a) 

Filing Instructions

This PIL should be filed behind the tab marked "Procedure Instruction Letters" in the binder for 

Program Policy Handbooks and Procedure Instruction Letters. 

Issuing Office and Contact Persons

MNM Division of Safety and Health 

Lawrence J. Trainor Jr. P.E., 202-693-9644 

E-mail address: trainor.lawrence@dol.gov

Distribution

All Program Policy Manual Holders 

Attachment 1 (State Dam Safety Officials)
# Materials Not Included in **Airworthiness Directive (AD) Docket**

Docket Number: F AA - 2013 - 0667 Directorate Identifier: 2013NM062AD 747 - 53A2844 --- 9/15/11

Name/Description of Item(s) Not Included in FDMS Docket and Maintained in the Supplemental AD Docket 

### MA **Y BE VIEWED AT:** Federal Aviation Administration

Transport Airplane Directorate Rules Docket 1601 Lind Ave. SW., Renton, WA 98057 425.227.1221 **DURING THE HOURS OF:** 9 a.m. and 3 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays. Form Date: 0 3/05/2008
### §1070d–41. Authorization of appropriations

There are authorized to be appropriated for this subpart such sums as may be necessary for fiscal year 2009 and each of the five succeeding fiscal years.

(Pub. L. 89–329, title IV, §419K, as added Pub. L. 99–498, title IV, §401(a), Oct. 17, 1986, 100 Stat. 1346; amended Pub. L. 102–325, title IV, §406(h), July 23, 1992, 106 Stat. 509; Pub. L. 105–244, title IV, §409(b), Oct. 7, 1998, 112 Stat. 1668; Pub. L. 110–315, title IV, §409(b), Aug. 14, 2008, 122 Stat. 3225.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Prior Provisions

A prior section 1070d–41, Pub. L. 89–329, title IV, §419K, as added Pub. L. 98–558, title VIII, §801(a), Oct. 30, 1984, 98 Stat. 2902, authorized appropriations for fiscal years 1986 to 1988 to carry out Robert C. Byrd Honors Scholarship Program, prior to the general revision of this part by Pub. L. 99–498.

#### Amendments

2008—Pub. L. 110–315 substituted "such sums as may be necessary for fiscal year 2009 and each of the five succeeding fiscal years" for "$45,000,000 for fiscal year 1999 and such sums as may be necessary for each of the 4 succeeding fiscal years".

1998—Pub. L. 105–244 substituted "$45,000,000 for fiscal year 1999" for "$10,000,000 for fiscal year 1993".

1992—Pub. L. 102–325 amended section generally. Prior to amendment, section read as follows: "There are authorized to be appropriated for this subpart $8,000,000 for fiscal year 1987, and such sums as may be necessary for the 4 succeeding fiscal years."

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date of 1998 Amendment

Amendment by Pub. L. 105–244 effective Oct. 1, 1998, except as otherwise provided in Pub. L. 105–244, see section 3 of Pub. L. 105–244, set out as a note under section 1001 of this title.
### SUBCHAPTER III—TRANSFERS OF AGENCIES AND FUNCTIONS
1 Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be

published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 02-30570

Summary Calendar

 

GISCLAIR TOWING COMPANY, INC.,

Plaintiff-Counter ClaimantAppellee-Cross-Appellant,

versus

MICHAEL MIRE,

Defendant-Counter ClaimantAppellant-Cross-Appellee.

--------------------

Appeals from the United States District Court

for the Eastern District of Louisiana

USDC No. 99-2347

--------------------

February 18, 2003

Before BARKSDALE, DEMOSS, and BENAVIDES, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:1

Appellant, claiming to have been injured at sea during an accident, presents a variety of

arguments asserting that the judgment of the district court should be reversed. After the

conclusion of a bench trial, the district court found, inter alia, that

(i) the evidence showed that appellant did not have an accident;
No. 02-30570

-2-

(ii) even if an accident occurred, there is no evidence, besides the testimony of

appellant (whom the district court deemed non-credible) that the steps that

allegedly caused the accident were unreasonably slippery; and

(iii) even if appellant had an accident, the damages that were identified were sustained

by incidents occurring and diagnosed years prior to the alleged accident.

Appellant provides no persuasive argument that the district court’s findings of fact were clearly

erroneous and, therefore, those findings must stand. See United States v. Chavez, 281 F.3d 479,

483 (5th Cir. 2002) (holding that a district court’s factual findings are reviewed for clear error).

These findings are dispositive of this appeal and render moot and irrelevant appellant Mire’s other

attacks on the judgment of the district court.

Accordingly, the judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.
Certification of Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer

Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C.
1350), the undersigned, Robert Thistle, Chief Executive Officer and
Chief Financial Officer of Micro Laboratories, Inc., (the "Company"),
does hereby certify, to his knowledge, that:

The Annual Report Form 10QSB for the six months ended September 30,
2001 of the Company (the "Report") fully complies with the requirements
of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1034, and
the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
the Company.

Date:       August 8, 2004

By /s/Robert Thistle
   ----------------------
Robert Thistle
Chief Executive Officer
Chief Financial Officer
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSIONWashington, D.C. 20549 FORM 8-K CURRENT REPORT
Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 Date of Report (Date of earliest event reported): June 15, 2011  IRIS INTERNATIONAL, INC.
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter) Delaware
    
    1-11181
    
    94-2579751(State or other Jurisdiction of Incorporation)
    
    (Commission File Number)
    
    (IRS Employer Identification No.) 9172 Eton AvenueChatsworth, CA
    
    91311(Address of Principal Executive Offices)
    
    (Zip Code) Registrants telephone number, including area code: (818) 709-1244 (Former name or former address if changed since last report.) Check the appropriate box below if the Form 8-K filing is intended to simultaneously satisfy the filing obligation of the registrant
under any of the following provisions: o Written communications pursuant to Rule 425 under the Securities Act (17 CFR 230.425)o Soliciting material pursuant to Rule 14a-12 under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.14a-12)o Pre-commencement communications pursuant to Rule 14d-2(b) under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.14d-2(b))o Pre-commencement communications pursuant to Rule 13e-4(c) under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.13e-4(c))
  1




---



##### 



Item 5.02
    
    Departure of Directors or Certain Officers; Election of Directors; Appointment of Certain Officers;
Compensatory Arrangements of Certain Officers. In February 2011, the Compensation Committee of our Board of Directors established a supplemental 2011 cash award
payable to César M. García, President and Chief Executive Officer of IRIS International, Inc., upon the achievement of
two critical 2010 milestones which were delayed into 2011. On June 15, 2011, we awarded Mr. García a supplemental cash bonus of $250,000. The supplemental bonus was awarded
to Mr. García upon his achievement of the following milestones:  
    
    Shipment of a target quantity of our iChemVELOCITY Automated Chemistry Analyzers in the United
States; and  
    
    Attainment of the first development milestone for our 3GEMS hematology program. The achievement
of this milestone also triggered an additional $500,000 cash contribution by Fujirebio, Inc. as part
of their $6 million commitment to this program. The Board of Directors believes that the successful achievement of these two milestones is critical to the
companys strategy. The payment of this cash bonus fulfills Mr. Garcías 2011 supplemental cash bonus award in its entirety. 2  2




---



##### 



SIGNATURE Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has duly caused this report to
be signed on its behalf by the undersigned hereunto duly authorized. IRIS INTERNATIONAL, INC.Date: June 21, 2011
    
    By: /s/ César M. GarcíaCésar M. GarcíaPresident and Chief Executive Officer
 3  3
EXHIBIT 31.1
 CCFNB BANCORP, INC.
 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
RULE 13a  14(a) UNDER THE SECURITIES  EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934, AS AMENDED
  1.
    
    I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of CCFNB Bancorp, Inc.;2.
    
    Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a
material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in
light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with
respect to the quarterly period covered by this report;3.
    
    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information
included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition,
results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods
presented in this report;4.
    
    The registrants other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing and
maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e)
and 15d  15 (e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange
Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and have:
     5.
    
    The registrants other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most
recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants
auditors and the audit committee of the registrants board of directors (or persons
performing the equivalent functions):(a)
    
    All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of
internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect
the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information;
and(b)
    
    Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who
have a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial reporting.
  /s/ Lance O. Diehl

     Lance O. DiehlPresident and Chief Executive Officer(Principal Executive Officer)
 38
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

MIDDLE DISTRICT

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

Respondent

v.

PHILLIP G. MOELLER, JR.,

Petitioner

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 844 MAL 2018

Petition for Allowance of Appeal from 

the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 15th day of May, 2019, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is 

DENIED.
###### Editorial Note on Part 46

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 46 appear by T.D. ATF-457, 66 FR 32220, 32221, June 14, 2001.

#### § 46.235 Filing requirements for multiple locations.

The dealer may file a consolidated return if all locations or places of business have the same employer identification number. The dealer also has the option of filing a separate return for each place of business or location.
SCWC-12-0000583

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF HAWAIʻI

________________________________________________________________

STATE OF HAWAIʻI, Respondent/Plaintiff-Appellee,

vs.

TYRONE SMITH, JR., Petitioner/Defendant-Appellant.

________________________________________________________________

CERTIORARI TO THE INTERMEDIATE COURT OF APPEALS

(CAAP-12-0000583; CR. NO. 10-1-1569)

ORDER REJECTING APPLICATION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI

(By: Recktenwald, C.J., Nakayama, McKenna, and Wilson, JJ., and

Circuit Judge Sakamoto, in place of Pollack, J., recused)

Petitioner/Defendant-Appellant Tyrone Smith, Jr.’s

application for writ of certiorari filed on November 6, 2014, is

hereby rejected.

DATED: Honolulu, Hawaiʻi, December 11, 2014.

Lars Robert Isaacson /s/ Mark E. Recktenwald

for petitioner

/s/ Paula A. Nakayama

Donn Fudo

for respondent /s/ Sabrina S. McKenna

/s/ Michael D. Wilson

/s/ Karl K. Sakamoto

Electronically Filed

Supreme Court

SCWC-12-0000583

11-DEC-2014

09:55 AM
#### Lucy Taylor, as Administratrix of the Estate of Willie M. Gale, Deceased, Plaintiff, and Ida Harp et al., Appellants, v. Hentschel Bros. et al., Defendants. Jacob Nudell, Original Attorney for Plaintiffs-Appellants, Respondent; Otto D. Strass, Substituted Attorney for Plaintiffs-Appellants, Appellant.

Order granting plaintiffs-appellants’ motion for substitution of attorneys, insofar as it fixes the lien of the retiring attorney at a sum equal to 25% of any recovery, modified on the law and the facts by reducing the percentage allowed to 10%. As so modified, the order, insofar as appealed from is affirmed, without costs. Upon all the facts set forth in the affidavits, the amount of the lien fixed by Special Term was excessive. Respondent by stipulation, and again upon oral argument in this court, waived his right to be compensated upon a *quantum meruit*basis. Lewis, P. J., Carswell, Johnston, Adel and Sneed, JJ., concur.
###### Editorial Note on Part 26

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 26 appear by T.D. ATF-451, 66 FR 21668, 21669, May 1, 2001.

#### § 26.119 Disposition of forms by district director of customs.

Two copies of the TTB Form 5170.7 will be forwarded to the appropriate TTB officer, and one copy of the form will be retained by the district director of customs and be available for inspection by appropriate TTB officers.

[T.D. ATF-451, 66 FR 21669, May 1, 2001, as amended by T.D. TTB-146, 82 FR 1134, Jan. 4, 2017]
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY ELEV

 583.29

 583.24

 581.55

 582.81

 582.70

 582.55

 583.43

 581.76

 583.33

 584.02

 583.11

 583.60

 583.43

 584.67

 583.58

 584.84

 583.86

 584.02

 584.16

 583.35

 582.63

 582.84

 582.82

 582.35

 582.08

 581.93

 581.68

 582.29

 581.45

 583.04

 583.93

 21,459

 21,429

 20,422

 21,170

 21,104

 21,014

 21,544

 20,545

 21,483

 21,902

 21,350

 21,647

 21,544

 22,303

 21,635

 22,408

 21,805

 21,902

 21,989

 21,495

 21,062

 21,187

 21,176

 20,895

 20,734

 20,645

 20,498

 20,859

 20,364

 21,307

 21,848

STORAGE

+67

-30

-1,007

+748

-66

-90

+530

-999

+938

+419

-552

+297

-103

+759

-668

+773

-603

+97

+87

-494

-433

+125

-11

-281

-161

-89

-147

+361

-495

+943

+541

CHANGE

4,023

3,966

3,476

4,386

3,995

3,988

4,299

3,526

4,502

4,248

3,760

4,198

3,978

4,434

3,700

4,444

3,756

4,073

4,064

3,775

3,812

4,091

4,021

3,885

3,950

3,985

3,958

4,208

3,636

4,355

4,156

INFLOW

 3,904

 3,896

 3,898

 3,923

 3,942

 3,947

 3,946

 3,944

 3,943

 3,951

 3,952

 3,962

 3,944

 3,963

 3,951

 3,969

 3,974

 3,939

 3,935

 3,938

 3,944

 3,942

 3,941

 3,942

 3,946

 3,944

 3,946

 3,941

 3,801

 3,794

 3,797

POWER

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

SPILL

 85

 85

 85

 85

 85

 85

 85

 85

 85

 85

 85

 85

 85

 85

 85

 85

 85

 85

 85

 85

 85

 85

 85

 85

 85

 85

 85

 85

 85

 85

 85

FISHTRAP

 0

 0

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 3

 1

 0

 1

 0

 0

 1

 1

 1

 1

 0

 0

 1

 1

 0

 0

 1

 1

C.F.S.

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

DECEMBER 2018 KESWICK RESERVOIR DAILY OPERATIONS RUN DATE: January 28, 2019

RES.

EVAP

C.F.S.

COMPUTED*

ACRE-FEET

RELEASE - C.F.S. 

TOTALS +456 124,648 121,759 0 2,635 24

ACRE-FEET +456 247,239 241,509 0 5,227 48

SUMMARY

RELEASE (ACRE-FEET)

POWER 241,509

SPILL 0

 21,392

FISH TRAP 5,227

SPRING

CR. P. P.

RELEASE (1)

 154

 224

 433

 73

 687

 145

 85

 44

 91

 58

 693

 96

 221

 306

 216

 312

 696

 310

 264

 109

 90

 482

 134

 98

 89

 432

 45

 398

 44

 44

 44

 7,117

 14,117

*COMPUTED INFLOW IS SUM OF CHANGE IN STORAGE, RELEASES, AND EVAPORATION.

SHASTA

RELEASE

C.F.S

 3,410

 3,385

 2,702

 3,972

 2,955

 3,476

 3,890

 3,153

 3,998

 3,665

 2,655

 3,747

 3,431

 3,807

 3,165

 3,512

 2,705

 3,472

 3,474

 3,317

 3,449

 3,329

 3,652

 3,470

 3,550

 3,222

 3,600

 3,444

 3,403

 4,104

 3,923

 107,037

 212,308

Table 8
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

IMAN JONES, ) No. 12-15903

)

Plaintiff - Appellant, ) D.C. No. 2:09-cv-01874-LRH-RJJ

)

v. ) MEMORANDUM*

)

LAS VEGAS METROPOLITAN )

POLICE DEPARTMENT; )

GARN CROSSMAN; DANIEL )

ROSEQUIST; JOSHUA GIESE, )

)

Defendants - Appellees. )

 )

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the District of Nevada

Larry R. Hicks, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted November 4, 2013**

San Francisco, California

Before: FARRIS, FERNANDEZ, and IKUTA, Circuit Judges.

Iman Jones appeals the district court’s grant of summary judgment in favor

FILED

NOV 14 2013

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

*This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent

except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

**The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral

argument. Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).
of Officer Garn Crossman and the Las Vegas Metropolitan Police Department

(LVMPD). We affirm.

All of Jones’ claims on appeal rest on his assertion that his rights under the

Fourth Amendment to the United States Constitution were violated because Officer

Crossman arrested him without probable cause. We disagree with that assertion.

We have carefully reviewed the record and agree with the district court that

on the facts presented probable cause existed because “under the totality of

circumstances known to the arresting officers, a prudent person would have

concluded that there was a fair probability that [Jones] had committed a crime.”

Conner v. Heiman, 672 F.3d 1126, 1132 (9th Cir. 2012) (internal quotation marks

omitted); see also United States v. Gourde, 440 F.3d 1065, 1069 (9th Cir. 2006)

(en banc); Peng v. Penghu, 335 F.3d 970, 976 (9th Cir. 2003). There was more

than sufficient corroboration for the victim-witness’ assertion that Jones had

pointed a firearm at him, including the discovery of a gun under the seat of Jones’s

truck that matched the description of the victim-witness. See Peng, 335 F.3d at

978–79; Fuller v. M.G. Jewelry, 950 F.2d 1437, 1444–45 (9th Cir. 1991). Because

there was no violation of Jones’ constitutional rights, Officer Crossman was

entitled to qualified immunity from 42 U.S.C. § 1983 liability at the first step of

the required analysis. See Pearson v. Callahan, 555 U.S. 223, 232, 129 S. Ct. 808,

2
815–16, 172 L. Ed. 2d 565 (2009). Similarly, absent a constitutional violation,

LVMPD did not incur § 1983 liability1 for the officer’s actions.2 Finally, because

Jones’ remaining claims also rest on his assertion that his arrest was unlawful, they

also fail.

AFFIRMED.

1See Monell v. Dep’t of Soc. Servs., 436 U.S. 658, 690–91, 98 S. Ct. 2018,

2035–36, 56 L. Ed. 2d 611 (1978).

2Villegas v. Gilroy Garlic Festival Ass’n, 541 F.3d 950, 957 (9th Cir. 2008)

(en banc); Palmerin v. City of Riverside, 794 F.2d 1409, 1414–15 (9th Cir. 1986).

3
### §1204. Repealed. Pub. L. 105–220, title II, §251(a)(1), Aug. 7, 1998, 112 Stat. 1079

Section, Pub. L. 89–750, title III, §326, as added Pub. L. 100–297, title II, §2102, Apr. 28, 1988, 102 Stat. 306, authorized programs for corrections education and education for other institutionalized individuals.

A prior section 1204, Pub. L. 89–750, title III, §305, Nov. 3, 1966, 80 Stat. 1217; Pub. L. 90–247, title V, §501, Jan. 2, 1968, 81 Stat. 815; Pub. L. 91–230, title III, §301, Apr. 13, 1970, 84 Stat. 160; Pub. L. 91–600, §3(a), Dec. 30, 1970, 84 Stat. 1669; Pub. L. 93–380, title VIII, §843(c)(2), (3), Aug. 21, 1974, 88 Stat. 611; Pub. L. 95–561, title XIII, §1304(b), Nov. 1, 1978, 92 Stat. 2357; Pub. L. 98–511, title I, §§102(f)(1), 104, Oct. 19, 1984, 98 Stat. 2366, 2367, related to allotment of grant funds, prior to the general amendment of this chapter by Pub. L. 100–297.