alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**Exhibit 10.1**

 

 

October 1, 2005

 

 

Mr. WilliamAliber

ChiefFinancial Officer

CrownMedia

6430South Fiddlers Green Circle

GreenwoodVillage, CO  80111

 

DearMr. Aliber:

 

Pursuantto your request, Hallmark Cards, Incorporated confirms to you that Hallmark Cardswill not instruct its wholly-owned subsidiaries to demand, nor will HallmarkCards or any of its wholly-owned subsidiaries demand, payment from Crown Mediaon any of the following obligations prior to October 31, 2006:

 

$75.0million Note payable to HC Crown plus accrued interest thereon;

$400.0million Note payable to HC Crown plus accrued interest thereon;

$70.0million payables to Hallmark Entertainment Holdings incurred in conjunctionwith the library transaction; and

$133.0million Note dated October 1, 2005, relating to past due amounts forlicense fees payable to Hallmark Entertainment Distribution (HED) plus accruedinterest thereon.

 

Furthermore,in the event that at any time Crown Media’s banks draw on the Letter of Creditprovided by Citibank N.A. in support of Crown Media’s Revolving CreditAgreement, Hallmark will not request reimbursement from Crown Media for suchamounts prior to October 31, 2006.

 

Itwould be Hallmark’s intent to re-evaluate this repayment schedule if allor substantially all, the stock or assets of Crown Media were sold to a thirdparty prior to October 31, 2006.

 

Sincerely,

 

 

RobertDruten

ChiefFinancial Officer

 

 

2501 McGee, Box 419580,Kansas City, Missouri 64141-6580

 

----
### subpart 2—regional mathematics and science education consortiums
|   | EXHIBIT 32.2 |   |
|--------|--------------|--------|

|   |
|--------|

|   | CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL FINANCIALOFFICERREQUIRED BY EXCHANGE ACT RULE 13a-14(b) |   |
|--------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------|

| I, Dean E. Sukowatey, Acting Chief Accounting Officer of ALL Fuels & Energy Company (the“Company”), hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss.1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the accompanying report on Form 10-QSB for the periodended March 31, 2007, and filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof(the “Report”), fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities ExchangeAct of 1934, as amended. I further certify that the information contained in the Report fairlypresents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. |
|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   |
|--------|

| Dated: May 21, 2007. | /s/ DEAN E. SUKOWATEY |   |
|----------------------|-----------------------|--------|

|   | Dean E. SukowateyActing Chief Accounting Officer |   |
|--------|--------------------------------------------------|--------|
#### Lottie Loew, Respondent, v. Charles A. McInerney and Others, Appellants.

Motion for stay granted, upon condition that the defendants pay the expenses of advertising before the time fixed for sale, with leave to plaintiff to apply for a modification or vacation of the stay, upon proof of the commencement of an action to foreclose a prior mortgage. Present — Jenks, P. J., Carr, Rich, Stapleton and Putnam, JJ.
C.J. Gi Ct.."0‘slaz, Parraguirre 

## OL-- J. conclude that the district court did not err in denying the motion. Accordingly, we

ORDER the judgment of the district court AFFIRMED. 2

Saitta cc: Hon. Connie J. Steinheimer, District Judge John Steven Olausen Attorney General/Carson City Washoe County District Attorney Washoe District Court Clerk

2 We have reviewed all documents that• appellant has submitted in proper person to the clerk of this court in this matter, and we conclude that no relief based upon those submissions is warranted. To the extent that appellant has attempted to present claims or facts in those submissions which were not previously presented in the proceedings below, we have declined to consider them in the first instance.

SUPREME COURT OF NEVADA 2 (0) 1947A afe4 1

.
IN THE UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA

Alexandria Division

In Re: :

:

LINDA M. ARMELLINO : CASE NO 20-12475-BFK

MICHAEL J. ARMELLINO : Chapter 11

Debtor :

:

ORDER AUTHORIZING ATTORNEY’S FEES AND EXPENSES

THIS MATTER came on the 2nd Interim (and final) application of

the counsel for the Debtors, Richard G. Hall, for the entry of an

Order authorizing his attorney’s fees and expenses incurred from

July 1, 2021 to February 16, 2022, and upon the certification of 

the applicant, and upon proper notice to all interested parties, 

and upon the objection of the Debtors, and it appearing that the 

fees requested are reasonable, and for the reasons stated from the 

bench, it is hereby

ORDERED that the objection of the Debtors is overruled, and

fees and expenses of $43,153.60, including 90.10 hours of

attorney’s time for $42,987.50, and expenses of $166.10, are

approved, and it is further 

ORDERED that the Debtors are hereby directed to pay to the

applicant the fees and expenses herein approved as well as any

unpaid portion of the fees and expenses approved in the applicant’s

1st Interim Application (Docket Item No. 89) within thirty (30) days 

from the entry of this order.

Case 20-12475-BFK Doc 164 Filed 03/16/22 Entered 03/16/22 09:01:29 Desc Main

Document Page 1 of 2
THE DEBTORS are notified that they may appeal this order by

filing a notice of appeal within fourteen (14) day of the entry

of this Order, and that they may thereafter also seek a stay from

this Court of the provisions of this order directing payment.

SIGNED this WK day of 0DUFK 2022

Hon. Brian F. Kenney

UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY JUDGE

I ask for this:

/s/ Richard G. Hall

Richard G. Hall, Esquire

Counsel for the Debtors

601 King Street, Suite 301

Alexandria, Virginia, 22314

(703) 256-7159

VA Bar No. 18076

richard.hall33@verizon.net

Seen:

/s/ Jack I. Frankel

Jack I. Frankel, Esquire

Counsel for the United States Trustee

1725 Duke Street, Suite 650

Alexandria, Virginia 22314

(703) 557-7229

Jack.I.Frankel@usdoj.gov

VAB No. 15019

Copies to:

(as above)

Michael J. ArmelOino

Linda M. ArmelOino

5811 Hampton Forest Way

Fairfax, VA, 22030

Certification Pursuant to Local Rule 9022(C)(1)

I hereby certify that this Order has been endorsed by all

necessary parties, and mailed to the Debtors (as above) on March

15, 2022 

/s/ Richard G. Hall

Mar 15 2022

/s/ Brian F Kenney

Entered On Docket: March 16, 2022

Case 20-12475-BFK Doc 164 Filed 03/16/22 Entered 03/16/22 09:01:29 Desc Main

Document Page 2 of 2
Exhibit 99.1
 
 Compass Diversified Holdings
    
    Investor Relations and Media Contacts:James J. Bottiglieri
    
    The IGB GroupChief Financial Officer
    
    Leon Berman / Michael Cimini203.221.1703
    
    212.477.8438 / 212.477.8261jbottiglieri@compassdiversifiedholdings.com
    
    lberman@igbir.com / mcimini@igbir.com
 Compass Diversified Holdings Declares Second Quarter 2011
Distribution of $0.36 Per Share
 Westport, Conn., July 6, 2011
  About Compass Diversified Holdings (CODI)
   
    
    The manufacture of quick-turn, prototype and production rigid printed circuit boards
(Advanced Circuits, www.advancedcircuits.com);
    
    The design and manufacture of promotionally priced upholstered furniture (American
Furniture Manufacturing, www.americanfurn.net);




---



##### 




    
    The design and manufacture of medical therapeutic support surfaces and other wound
treatment devices (Anodyne Medical Device, also doing business and known as Tridien
Medical, www.anodynemedicaldevice.com);
    
    The design and marketing of wearable baby carriers and related products (ERGObaby,
www.ergobabycarriers.com);
    
    The design, manufacture and marketing of premium suspension products for mountain bikes
and powered off-road vehicles (Fox Racing Shox, www.foxracingshox.com);
    
    The design, sourcing and fulfillment of logo based promotional products (Halo Lee Wayne,
www.haloleewayne.com);
    
    The design and manufacture of premium home and gun safes (Liberty Safe,
www.libertysafe.com); and
    
    The provision of temporary staffing services, operating approximately 300 locations in
29 states (Staffmark, www.staffmark.com).
 www.compassdiversifiedholdings.com
 This press release may contain certain forward-looking statements, including statements with regard
to the future performance of the Company. Words such as believes, expects, projects, and
future or similar expressions, are intended to identify forward-looking statements. These
forward-looking statements are subject to the inherent uncertainties in predicting future results
and conditions. Certain factors could cause actual results to differ materially from those
projected in these forward-looking statements, and some of these factors are enumerated in the risk
factor discussion in the Form 10-K filed by CODI with the Securities and Exchange Commission for
the year ended December 31, 2010 and other filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission.
CODI undertakes no obligation to publicly update or revise any forward-looking statements, whether
as a result of new information, future events or otherwise.
Memorandum	

To		 United	States	Department	of	Energy		

From		 Benjamin	Longstreth,	Natural	Resources	Defense	Council	

Date		 November	4,	2014	

Re		 Ex	Parte	Communication	

On	Tuesday,	October	28,	2014,	several	representatives	of	fan	manufacturers	and	energy	

efficiency	advocates	met	with	the	Department	of	Energy	to	discuss	potential	standards	for	

commercial	and	industrial	fans.		

The	fan	manufacturers	and	energy	efficiency	advocates	presented	information	concerning	

the	fan	market,	fan	energy‐efficiency	and	the	most	promising	means	of	designing	federal	

efficiency	standards	for	commercial	and	industrial	fans.	The	attached	slides	were	

presented	at	the	meeting.	

The	following	individuals	were	present	or	on	the	telephone:	

John	Cymbalsky,	DOE			

	 Dan	Cohen,	DOE	

Andrew	deLaski,	ASAP	

Wade	Smith,	AMCA	International	

Marc	Bublitz,	New	York	Blower	Company	

Tom	Catania,	University	of	Michigan	

Benjamin	Longstreth,	NRDC	

	 Via	telephone:		

Joanna	Mauer,	ASAP	(via	telephone)	

Louis	Starr,	NEEA	

Meg	Waltner,	NRDC	

	 Respectfully	submitted,		

	 s/	Benjamin	Longstreth	

	 Natural	Resources	Defense	Council
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY HIGH

 1,188

 1,150

 1,143

 1,195

 1,180

 1,131

 1,100

 1,129

 1,109

 1,119

 1,163

 1,163

 1,096

 1,054

 989

 958

 924

 911

 901

 893

 881

 870

 852

 836

 828

 816

 811

 806

 814

 814

 823

 985

 989

 995

 1,036

 999

 983

 972

 952

 897

 911

 901

 868

 863

 868

 827

 831

 838

 833

 842

 787

 798

 782

 749

 744

 722

 714

 737

 668

 682

 703

 689

 1,074

 1,075

 1,079

 1,104

 1,076

 1,056

 1,046

 1,041

 1,014

 1,017

 1,016

 989

 990

 955

 907

 893

 880

 879

 875

 855

 845

 830

 815

 802

 788

 779

 774

 738

 744

 755

 752

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

OCTOBER 2009 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: November 3, 2009

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

FARRAR PARK AT DUTCH SLOUGH
(4910-13-PI

DEPARTMENT OF TR~SPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

14 CFR Part 39

2.D\O-Or30

IDocket No. FAA-2009~ .;.••.;..;..;.:Directorate Identifier 2009-NM-087-AD;

,foZH ZOIO -05-o:J

Amendment 39-*****; AD 2a09-o'·.I_l'l'><j

R1N 2120-AA64

Airworthiness Directives; BAE Systems (Operations) Limited Model ATP Airplanes

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), Department of Transportation

(DOT).

'AI'F.

As it was determined that thesc inspections were necessary to maintain the

structural integrity of the aeroplane. EASA AD 2006-0090 rwhich

corresponds to FAA AD 2007-15-08] was issued * * * . Since the origmal

Issue of the SB, three reVisions have been published. Revision 1 of the 58

included only editorial changes. Revision 2 of the 58 corrected the

fuselage frame designations in Parts 50 and 50A and extended the

allowable time before mitial inspection. 1.naddition. the repeat inspection

interval in Part 43 of the S8 was reduced. In the latest Revision 3 orthe

SB, the grace period for the initial inspection in Part 50 has been clarified.

1\ review of the results of the final fuselage fatigue test identified the need

for additional and revised safety-related fatigue- and environmental

inspections for the fuselage. These additional tasks were introduced by

Service Bulletin (SB) ATP-5l-002 * * * .

the unsafe condition as:

UTI, . S'·MIlO~

ACTION: Final rule; request for comments. ANVvt -1-

~

SUMMARY: We are adopting a new airworthiness directive (AD) for the products list dC-~

All.

( 'o>!1(-0 above that would supersede an existing AD. This AD results from mandatory cOl1tinuin

ainvorthincss infoDnation (MeAl) originated by an aviation authority of another count "' ',~"(i..

. ,.•

i-i '/ '" 1.

. . . . . . . ',. i'-'v L,

to Identify and correct an unsafe condition on an aVIation product. The MeAl descnbes"M~ .-

-, I '

-.(~! I /i)
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. No. 95-5937 RONALD MAURICE WOODS, Defendant-Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Abingdon. Samuel G. Wilson, District Judge. (CR-95-7-A) Submitted: December 12, 1996 Decided: December 23, 1996 Before MURNAGHAN, NIEMEYER, and LUTTIG, Circuit Judges.

_________________________________________________________________ Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

_________________________________________________________________ COUNSEL G. Walter Bressler, BRESSLER, CURCIO & STOUT, P.C., Bristol, Virginia, for Appellant. Robert P. Crouch, Jr., United States Attorney, S. Randall Ramseyer, Assistant United States Attorney, Abingdon, Virginia, for Appellee.

_________________________________________________________________Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).

_________________________________________________________________ OPINION PER CURIAM: Ronald Maurice Woods appeals his conviction of possession of a firearm by a convicted felon in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 922(g)(1) (1994). We affirm. On September 15, 1994, police officers stopped Woods after they clocked his car on radar as going seventy-four miles per hour in a sixty-five mile per hour zone. The officers advised Woods that he hadbeen pulled over for speeding, and they asked for his license and registration. Woods could not find either and b ecame increasingly nervous. The officers asked Woods if he had any illegal drugs or weapons in his car and asked if they could search his car. Woods told them to "go ahead." Woods asserts that the district court erred in denying his motion to suppress evidence obtained from the search and that the district court abused its discretion in admitting into evidence money, a beeper, rolling papers, and an address book obtained in the same search. The record shows that the district court did not err in denying Woods' motion to suppress b ecause W oods testified that when he gave the officers permission to search he did not object to the search of his car. See United States v. Gordon , 895 F.2d 932, 938 (4th Cir.), cert. denied , 498 U.S. 846 (1990). Further, the district court did not abuse its discretion in admitting into evidence the other items found in the car because it gave an adequate limiting instruction to the jury eliminating any undue prejudice. See United States v. Russell , 971 F.2d 1098, 1104-05 (4th Cir. 1992), cert. denied , 506 U.S. 1066 (1993); United States v. Jones , 907 F.2d 456, 460 (4th Cir. 1990), cert. denied , 498 U.S. 1029 (1991).We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 2
Editorial Note on Part 46
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 46 appear by T.D. ATF-457, 66 FR 32220, 32221, June 14, 2001.

§ 46.243 Articles at multiple locations. The dealer must maintain a list of all places where the dealer holds articles subject to the floor stocks tax. This list must include: ( a ) Address;
( b ) Name of the proprietor (if different);
( c ) The employer identification number (if different); and
( d ) Types and quantities of articles held at each location.
(Approved by the Office of Management and Budget under control number 1513-0129)
###### Editorial Note on Part 26

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 26 appear by T.D. ATF-451, 66 FR 21668, 21669, May 1, 2001.

#### § 26.210 Liquor dealer registration and recordkeeping.

Every person bringing liquors into the United States from the Virgin Islands who sells, or offers for sale, such liquors must register and keep records as a wholesale dealer in liquor or as a retail dealer in liquor in accordance with part 31 of this chapter.

(26 U.S.C. 5121, 5122, 5123, 5124)

[T.D. TTB-79, 74 FR 37406, July 28, 2009]
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY ELEV

 543.88

 543.16

 542.43

 541.36

 540.57

 540.09

 539.56

 538.76

 537.72

 537.04

 536.07

 535.44

 534.54

 533.71

 532.61

 531.72

 530.75

 529.56

 528.08

 526.62

 525.38

 524.46

 523.51

 522.68

 522.17

 521.62

 521.04

 520.10

 519.11

 517.79

 516.31

 368.4

 365.5

 362.6

 358.3

 355.2

 353.3

 351.2

 348.1

 344.1

 341.4

 337.7

 335.3

 331.9

 328.7

 324.6

 321.3

 317.7

 313.3

 307.9

 302.6

 298.2

 294.9

 291.6

 288.6

 286.9

 285.0

 282.9

 279.7

 276.3

 271.8

 266.9

STORAGE

-3.2

-2.9

-2.9

-4.2

-3.1

-1.9

-2.1

-3.1

-4.0

-2.6

-3.7

-2.4

-3.4

-3.1

-4.1

-3.3

-3.6

-4.4

-5.4

-5.3

-4.4

-3.3

-3.4

-2.9

-1.8

-1.9

-2.0

-3.2

-3.4

-4.5

-5.0

CHANGE

3,074

3,349

3,483

2,546

2,488

2,858

2,798

2,467

1,987

2,580

1,761

2,160

1,698

2,103

1,819

2,325

2,167

1,544

578

632

1,118

1,788

1,663

1,635

1,934

1,544

1,515

1,101

1,260

636

261

INFLOW

 878

 945

 963

 898

 735

 671

 690

 767

 784

 731

 707

 674

 618

 563

 545

 573

 589

 538

 445

 401

 390

 444

 528

 489

 453

 453

 434

 437

 581

 604

 495

MADERA

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

SPILL

 3,497

 3,556

 3,658

 3,490

 3,027

 2,848

 2,889

 3,003

 3,001

 2,940

 2,689

 2,466

 2,557

 2,829

 3,096

 3,141

 3,098

 2,908

 2,529

 2,595

 2,693

 2,672

 2,546

 2,320

 2,090

 1,737

 1,792

 2,010

 2,074

 2,019

 1,991

FRIANT-KERN

 64

 43

 71

 55

 76

 72

 48

 66

 41

 35

 46

 33

 48

 74

 18

 43

 43

 45

 73

 38

 13

 61

 20

 34

 27

 54

 39

 22

 51

 11

 22

C.F.S.

 .49

 .33

 .55

 .43

 .60

 .57

 .38

 .52

 .33

 .28

 .37

 .27

 .39

 .61

 .15

 .36

 .36

 .38

 .62

 .33

 .11

 .53

 .18

 .30

 .24

 .48

 .35

 .20

 .46

 .10

 .20

INCHES

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

PRECIP

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

AUGUST 2000 MILLERTON LAKE DAILY OPERATIONS RUN DATE: January 28, 2002

IN LAKE

EVAPORATION

INCHES

C.F.S.

COMPUTED*

1000 ACRE-FEET

RELEASE - C.F.S. 

TOTALS -104.7 58,872 19,023 83,761 0 1,386 11.47 .00

ACRE-FEET -104,714 116,773 37,732 166,140 0 2,749

COMMENTS:

* COMPUTED INFLOW IS THE SUM OF CHANGE IN STORAGE, RELEASES, PUMPING AND EVAPORATION.

SUMMARY

RELEASE (ACRE-FEET)

CANALS

FRIANT-KERN

MADERA

 166,140

 37,732 218,738

PRECIPITATION

THIS MONTH =

JULY 1, 2000 TO DATE = 0.00

 371.6

 14,866 0.00

CANALS

AT FRIANT

TOTAL RELEASES

OUTLET

 261

 261

 259

 243

 219

 218

 219

 210

 199

 199

 199

 200

 199

 219

 241

 241

 247

 261

 262

 260

 262

 260

 260

 260

 262

 263

 263

 263

 263

 262

 260

RIVER

 7,495

 14,866

RIVER
Editorial Note on Part 20
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 20 appear by T.D. ATF-235, 66 FR 5473, Jan. 19, 2001, and T.D. ATF-463 and T.D. ATF-462, 66 FR 42733, 42736, Aug. 15, 2001.

§ 20.45 Organizational documents. The supporting information required by § 20.42(a)(7) includes, as applicable: ( a ) *Corporate documents.* ( 1 ) Certified true copy of the certificate of incorporation, or certified true copy of certificate authorizing the corporation to operate in the State where the premises are located (if other than that in which incorporated);
( 2 ) Certified list of names and addresses of officers and directors, along with a statement designating which corporate offices, if applicable, are directly responsible for the specially denatured spirits portion of the business; and
( 3 ) Statement showing the number of shares of each class of stock or other evidence of ownership, authorized and outstanding, the par value, and the voting rights of the respective owners or holders.
( b ) *Articles of partnership.* True copy of the articles of partnership or association, if any, or certificate of partnership or association where required to be filed by any State, county, or municipality.
( c ) *Statement of interest.* ( 1 ) Names and addresses of persons owning 10% or more of each of the classes of stock in the corporation, or legal entity, and the nature and amount of the stockholding or other interest of each, whether such interest appears in the name of the interested party or in the name of another for him or her. If a corporation is wholly owned or controlled by another corporation, persons owning 10% or more of each of the classes of stock of the parent corporation are considered to be the persons interested in the business of the subsidiary, and the names and addresses of such persons must be submitted to the appropriate TTB officer if specifically requested.
( 2 ) In the case of an individual owner or partnership, name and address of every person interested in the business, whether such interest appears in the name of the interested party or in the name of another for the interested person.
[T.D. ATF-199, 50 FR 9162, Mar. 6, 1985, as amended by T.D. ATF-435, 66 FR 5474, Jan. 19, 2001]