alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
### §1128a. American overseas research centers

#### (a) Centers authorized

The Secretary is authorized to make grants to and enter into contracts with any American overseas research center that is a consortium of institutions of higher education (hereafter in this section referred to as a "center") to enable such center to promote postgraduate research, exchanges and area studies.

#### (b) Use of grants

Grants made and contracts entered into pursuant to this section may be used to pay all or a portion of the cost of establishing or operating a center or program, including—

(1) the cost of faculty and staff stipends and salaries;

(2) the cost of faculty, staff, and student travel;

(3) the cost of the operation and maintenance of overseas facilities;

(4) the cost of teaching and research materials;

(5) the cost of acquisition, maintenance, and preservation of library collections;

(6) the cost of bringing visiting scholars and faculty to a center to teach or to conduct research;

(7) the cost of organizing and managing conferences; and

(8) the cost of publication and dissemination of material for the scholarly and general public.

#### (c) Limitation

The Secretary shall only award grants to and enter into contracts with centers under this section that—

(1) receive more than 50 percent of their funding from public or private United States sources;

(2) have a permanent presence in the country in which the center is located; and

(3) are organizations described in section 501(c)(3) of title 26 which are exempt from taxation under section 501(a) of such title.

#### (d) Development grants

The Secretary is authorized to make grants for the establishment of new centers. The grants may be used to fund activities that, within 1 year, will result in the creation of a center described in subsection (c).

#### (e) Application

Each center desiring to receive a grant or contract under this section shall submit an application to the Secretary at such time, in such manner, and accompanied by such information and assurances as the Secretary may require.

(Pub. L. 89–329, title VI, §609, as added Pub. L. 105–244, title VI, §601, Oct. 7, 1998, 112 Stat. 1782; amended Pub. L. 110–315, title VI, §608, Aug. 14, 2008, 122 Stat. 3338.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Prior Provisions

A prior section 609 of Pub. L. 89–329 was classified to section 1126 of this title, prior to the general amendment of this part by Pub. L. 105–244.

Another prior section 609 of Pub. L. 89–329, title VI, Nov. 8, 1965, 79 Stat. 1266; Pub. L. 92–318, title I, §131(d)(2)(D), June 23, 1972, 86 Stat. 260, prohibited equipment grants for sectarian instruction or religious worship and was classified to section 1129 of this title, prior to the general amendment of this subchapter by Pub. L. 96–374.

#### Amendments

2008—Subsec. (e). Pub. L. 110–315 added subsec. (e).
#### § 19.155 Change of surety bond terms—consent of surety.

In order to change the terms of an approved bond, both the principal and the surety company that guaranteed the bond must agree to the change. TTB must also approve the change. All changes to the terms of a bond must be executed on form TTB F 5000.18, Change of Bond (Consent of Surety) by both the principal and the surety with the same formality and proof of authority as required for the original bond. The completed, executed TTB F 5000.18 must be submitted to the National Revenue Center.

(26 U.S.C. 5173)
(No. 74-CC-209

#### Kenneth Eugene Laird, Claimant, *vs.*State of Illinois, Department of Transportation, Respondent.

*Opinion filed February 20, 1974.*

Kenneth Laird, Claimant, pro se.

William J. Scott, Attorney General; Howard W. Feldman, Assistant Attorney General, for Respondent.

Per Curiam.
Exhibit 3.41.1
 ARTICLES OF INCORPORATION
 OF
 MERCATOR SHIPPING CORPORATION
 PURSUANT
TO THE MARSHALL ISLANDS BUSINESS CORPORATIONS ACT
  A.
    
    The name of the Corporation shall be:
 MERCATOR
SHIPPING CORPORATION
 B.
    
    The purpose of the Corporation is to engage in any lawful act or activity for which corporations
may now or hereafter be organized under the Marshall Islands Business Corporations Act.C.
    
    The registered address of the Corporation in the Marshall Islands is Trust Company Complex,
Ajeltake Road, Ajeltake Island, Majuro, Marshall Islands MH96960. The name of the Corporations
registered agent at such address is The Trust Company of the Marshall Islands, Inc.D.
    
    The aggregate number of shares of stock that the Corporation is authorized to issue is Fifty
Thousand (50,000) registered shares with a par value of One US Dollar (US$1.00) per share.E.
    
    The Corporation shall have every power which a corporation
now or hereafter organized under the Marshall Islands Business Corporations Act may have.F.
    
    The name and address of the incorporator is:
 Name
    
    Post Office AddressMajuro Nominees Ltd.
    
    P.O. Box 1405MajuroMarshall Islands




---



##### 



G.
    
    The Board of Directors as well as the shareholders of  the Corporation shall have the
authority to adopt, amend or repeal the bylaws of the Corporation.H.
    
    Corporate existence shall begin upon filing these Articles of Incorporation with the Registrar
of Corporations as of the filing date stated on these Articles.
  Majuro Nominees Ltd. 
       Incorporatorby:

(-s-)
EXHIBIT 32.1

Certification of Chief Executive Officer of Terra Block International, Inc. pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 1992 and Section 1350 of 18 U.S.C. 63.

I, Gregory A. Pitner, the Chief
Executive Officer of Terra Block International, Inc. hereby certify that to my knowledge,
Terra Block International, Inc. quarterly report on Form 10-QSB for the period ended
September 30, 2003, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in the periodic report on
Form 10-QSB and the financial statements contained therein fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of the operations of Terra Block
International, Inc.

Date:  August 13, 2004

| |  | TERRA BLOCK
INTERNATIONAL, INC.BY: /s/ Gregory A. PitnerGregory A. PitnerCEO and Chairman
| |  | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Exhibit
      32.1


CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO


18
      U.S.C.
      SECTION 1350


AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
      connection with the Report of Vital Health Technologies, Inc, a Minnesota
      corporation (the “Company”), on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended September
      30, 2006 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof
      (the ”Report”),I, Halton Martin, certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
      adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to
      the
      best of my knowledge and belief:





1.   The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





2.   The
      information contained in this Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operations of operations
      of  the Company.








Dated:
      January 8, 2008








VITAL
      HEALTH TECHNOLOGIES,
      INC.








By:
/s/
      Halton
      Martin


Halton
      Martin


Chief
      Executive Officer and


Chief
      Financial Officer
### §§4841 to 4843. Repealed. Pub. L. 103–382, title III, §365, Oct. 20, 1994, 108 Stat. 3975

Section 4841, Pub. L. 100–297, title III, §3241, Apr. 28, 1988, 102 Stat. 343, related to special grant rules.

Section 4842, Pub. L. 100–297, title III, §3242, Apr. 28, 1988, 102 Stat. 343, authorized appropriations.

Section 4843, Pub. L. 100–297, title III, §3243, Apr. 28, 1988, 102 Stat. 344, defined terms used in this chapter.
##### 



EXHIBIT 21.1
  SUBSIDIARIES
    OF THE REGISTRANT
  State or Other Jurisdiction
    ofName of Subsidiary*

Incorporation or
    Organizationiptelorg GmbH

GermanyIEX Corporation

NevadaSantera Systems Inc.

DelawareTaqua, Inc.

DelawareTekelec Argentina SRL

ArgentinaTekelec Limited

United KingdomTekelec France

FranceTekelec Canada Inc.

CanadaTekelec Germany GmbH

GermanyTekelec Italy srl

ItalyTekelec do Brasil Ltda.

BrazilTekelec Singapore Pte. Ltd.

SingaporeTekelec Spain, SL

SpainTekelec International Inc.

DelawareTekelec Malaysia Sdn. Bhd

MalaysiaTekelec Mexico, S.de R.L. de
    C.V.

MexicoTekelec Systems India Private
    Ltd.

IndiaTekelec Taiwan Co. Ltd.

TaiwanVocalData, Inc.

Delaware     *
    
    The subsidiaries of the Registrant do not do business under any
    name other than as listed above.
<PAGE>
                                   EXHIBIT 23
                        PENNROCK FINANCIAL SERVICES CORP.


(Letterhead of Simon Lever & Company appears here)

                          INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' CONSENT

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the registration statement of
PennRock Financial Services Corp. on Form S-3 (No. 33-10568) of our report dated
January 31, 2002 on the consolidated financial statements of PennRock Financial
Services Corp. and subsidiaries appearing in and incorporated by reference in
this Annual Report on Form 10-K.

                                                       /s/ SIMON LEVER & COMPANY


Lancaster, Pennsylvania
March 11, 2002
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff—Appellee, v. Ramon LOPEZ-ORTIZ, a.k.a. Francisco Cardosolemus, Defendant—Appellant.

No. 05-50872.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted: July 17, 2006.*

Decided: July 21, 2006.

Becky S. Walker, Esq., Beong-Soo Kim, Esq., USLA-Office of the U.S. Attorney Criminal Division, Los Angeles, CA, for Plaintiff-Appellee.

Gail Ivens, Esq., Federal Public Defender’s Office, Los Angeles, CA, for Defendant-Appellant.

Before: B. FLETCHER, HAWKINS and THOMAS, Circuit Judges.

*

 This panel unanimously finds this case suit*567able for decision without oral argument. *See*Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

*567MEMORANDUM **

Appellant’s unopposed motion for an extension of time to file appellant’s response to appellee’s motion for summary affirmance is granted.

A review of the record and the opening brief indicates that the questions raised in this appeal are so insubstantial as not to require further argument. *See United States v. Hooton,*693 F.2d 857, 858 (9th Cir.1982) (per curiam) (stating standard). The Supreme Court’s decision in *Almendarez-Torres v. United States,*523 U.S. 224, 118 S.Ct. 1219, 140 L.Ed.2d 350 (1998), remains binding on this court until the Supreme Court overrules it. *See United States v. Weiland,*420 F.3d 1062, 1079 n. 16 (9th Cir.2005) (noting that this court remains bound by the Supreme Court’s holding in *Almendarez-Torres*that a district court judge may enhance a sentence on the basis of prior convictions, even if the fact of those convictions was not found by a jury beyond a reasonable doubt). Further, we upheld the identical condition of supervised release challenged here in *United States v. Rodriguez-Rodnguez,*441 F.3d 767 (9th Cir.2006).

Accordingly, we grant the government’s motion for summary affirmance of this appeal.

AFFIRMED.

**

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
###### Editorial Note on Part 479

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 479 appear by T.D. ATF-487, 68 FR 3752, Jan. 24, 2003.

#### § 479.161 National Firearms Act stamps.

“National Firearms Act” stamps evidencing payment of the transfer tax or tax on the making of a firearm are maintained by the Director. The remittance for purchase of the appropriate tax stamp shall be submitted with the application. Upon approval of the application, the Director will cause the appropriate tax to be paid by affixing the appropriate stamp to the application.

[T.D. ATF-270, 53 FR 10511, Mar. 31, 1988]
#### Lance Gerald MILLIMAN, Appellant, v. Betty Jean LINDEMOEN; Charles Weaver; Beverly Anderson; Kim Brandell; Susan Fallek Rogers; Colia Ceisel; Janice Allen; Dorrie Estebo; Bethany Lindberg; Robert Tipp; Kelly O’Brien; Susan Myklebye Williams; Michael Campion; Kay Gavinski; Jill Prohofsky, Appellees.

No. 05-2847.

United States Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit.

Submitted: July 26, 2006.

Decided: July 31, 2006.

Lance Gerald Milliman, South Haven, MN, pro se.

Ericka S. Schneller, John Steven Garry, Attorney General’s Office, St. Paul, MN, Thomas George Haluska, Anoka County Attorney’s Office, Anoka, MN, for Appellees.

Before SMITH, MAGILL, and BENTON, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

In this interlocutory appeal, Lance Gerald Milliman challenges the district court’s1 denial of his motion for a temporary restraining order and preliminary injunction. Milliman sought to prevent the suspension of his Minnesota commercial driver’s license during the pendency of his federal suit challenging the constitutionality of Minn.Stat. § 518.551, subd. 13 (2006) (providing for suspension of driver’s license for nonpayment of child support). We find this appeal moot because on June 23, 2005, a Minnesota state court issued an order granting Milliman the relief he sought: a stay of the suspension of his Minnesota commercial driver’s license until resolution of his action in federal district court. *See Honig v. Students of the Cal. Sch. for the Blind,*471 U.S. 148, 149, 105 S.Ct. 1820, 85 L.Ed.2d 114 (1985) (per curiam) (once action sought in request for PI is taken, case is mooted); *Flittie v. Erickson,*724 F.2d 80, 81 (8th Cir.1983) (appeal regarding claim for injunctive re*526lief became moot where, at administrative hearing that occurred after district court issued order, plaintiff received specific relief requested in federal suit such that substantial controversy no longer existed).

Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal as moot.

1

. The Honorable Richard H. Kyle, United States District Judge for the District of Minnesota, adopting the report and recommendations of the Honorable Raymond L. Erickson, United States Magistrate Judge for the District of Minnesota.
###### Editorial Note on Part 40

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 40 appear by T.D. ATF-460, 66 FR 39094-39096, July 27, 2001; T.D. ATF-464, 66 FR 43479, Aug. 20, 2001; and T.D. TTB-91, 76 FR 5479, Feb. 1, 2011.

#### § 40.383 Interference with administration.

Whoever, corruptly or by force or threats of force, endeavors to hinder or obstruct the administration of this subpart, or endeavors to intimidate or impede any TTB officer acting in an official capacity, or forcibly rescues or attempts to rescue or causes to be rescued any property, after it has been duly seized for forfeiture to the United States in connection with a violation or intended violation of this subpart, shall be liable to the penalties prescribed by law.

(68A Stat. 855; 26 U.S.C. 7212)
CERTIFICATION OF
               CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
                       PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

In connection with the accompanying Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of Vital
Health Technologies, Inc. for the quarter ended September 30, 2003, I, Halton
Martin, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of Vital Health
Technologies, Inc. hereby certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best
of my knowledge and belief, that:

     1.   Such Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB for the period ended September
          30, 2003, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     2.   The information contained in such Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB for
          the period ended September 30, 2003, fairly presents, in all material
          respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Vital
          Health Technologies, Inc.

Dated:  November 14, 2003

VITAL HEALTH TECHNOLOGIES, INC.


By: /s/ Halton Martin
-------------------------------------
Chief Executive Officer and
Chief Financial Officer
§ 19.366 Alcohol. ( a ) *Containers.* A proprietor may put alcohol for industrial use in bottles, packages, or other containers, subject to the provisions of subpart S of this part. A proprietor must follow the provisions of subpart T of this part when bottling alcohol for nonindustrial domestic use.
( b ) *Closures.* Closures or other devices must be affixed to containers of alcohol as provided in subpart T of this part.
( c ) *Bottle labels.* All bottles of alcohol for industrial use must have a label that is securely affixed to the bottle showing the word “Alcohol” and the name and plant number of the bottler. The proprietor may place additional information on the label if it is not inconsistent with the required information.
( d ) *Case marks.* Each case of bottled alcohol must bear the marks required by subpart S of this part.
(26 U.S.C. 5201, 5206, 5235, 5301)
#### Frank Smith, Appellant, v. Charles Ess, Respondent.

Judgment affirmed, with costs. All concurred.
Exhibit31.3



CERTIFICATION ACCOMPANYING PERIODIC REPORT

PURSUANT TO SECTION 302

OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



I, Thinh Q. Tran, Chairman of the Board, President and Chief Executive Officer, certify that:



|1. | I have reviewed this Annual Report on Form 10-K/A of Sigma Designs, Inc.; and                                                                                                                                                                                                                             
|-- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|   |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                           
|2. | Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report.



|                    |                                                                           
|------------------- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                    | /s/ Thinh Q. Tran                                                         
|Dated: May 31, 2016 | Thinh Q. Tran
Chairman of the Board, President and Chief
Executive Officer
#### Santos DIAZ-MARTINEZ, Petitioner, v. Alberto R. GONZALES, Attorney General, Respondent.

No. 04-76052.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

*168Submitted Feb. 13, 2006.*

Filed Feb. 17, 2006.

Santos Diaz-Martinez, Anaheim, CA, pro se.

CAC-District Counsel, Esq., Office of the District Counsel, Department of Homeland Security, Los Angeles, CA, Ronald E. LeFevre, Chief Counsel, Office of the District Counsel, Department of Homeland Security, San Francisco, CA, Norah Ascoli Schwarz, Esq., John C. Cunningham, Esq., U.S. Department of Justice, Civil Div./Office of Immigration Lit., Washington, DC, for Respondent.

Before: FERNANDEZ, RYMER, and BYBEE, Circuit Judges.

*

 The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. *See*Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

MEMORANDUM **

Santos Diaz-Martinez, a native and citizen of Mexico, petitions pro se for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ summary affirmance without opinion of an immigration judge’s (“IJ”) denial of his motion to reopen removal proceedings, in which he alleges ineffective assistance of counsel. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 8 U.S.C. § 1252. Reviewing for abuse of discretion, *Socop-Gonzalez v. INS,*272 F.3d 1176, 1187 (9th Cir.2001) (en banc), we deny the petition for review.

The IJ did not abuse his discretion in concluding that Diaz-Martinez “failed to present any evidence that he was prejudiced by the legal representation by La Guadalupana.” The letter Diaz-Martinez submitted from the Orange County District Attorney’s office concerning its investigation of La Guadalupana does not establish that Diaz-Martinez received any ineffective assistance of counsel, or that the outcome of his proceedings may have been affected. *See Rojas-Garcia v. Ashcroft,*339 F.3d 814, 824-26 (9th Cir.2003).

PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED.

**

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1995
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1995
<CASH>                                           9,703
<SECURITIES>                                    31,859
<RECEIVABLES>                                  135,756
<ALLOWANCES>                                     3,425
<INVENTORY>                                     78,730
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               267,723
<PP&E>                                         402,125
<DEPRECIATION>                                 253,315
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 459,802
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          167,952
<BONDS>                                              0
<COMMON>                                        23,229
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                           39,155
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<OTHER-SE>                                   (314,906)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   459,802
<SALES>                                        831,103
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               831,103
<CGS>                                          634,386
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  634,386
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               125,139
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              54,320
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 20,102
<INCOME-TAX>                                    11,356
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              4,213
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                (3,448)
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       765
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .03
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .03
        

</TABLE>