alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
I 

116TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 5711 

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located at 

1 League in Irvine, California, as the ‘‘Tuskegee Airman Lieutenant 

Colonel Robert J. Friend Memorial Post Office Building’’. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JANUARY 29, 2020 

Ms. PORTER introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Oversight and Reform 

A BILL 

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service 

located at 1 League in Irvine, California, as the 

‘‘Tuskegee Airman Lieutenant Colonel Robert J. Friend 

Memorial Post Office Building’’. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. TUSKEGEE AIRMAN LIEUTENANT COLONEL 

4 ROBERT J. FRIEND MEMORIAL POST OFFICE 

5 BUILDING. 

6 (a) DESIGNATION.—The facility of the United States 

7 Postal Service located at 1 League in Irvine, California, 

8 shall be known and designated as the ‘‘Tuskegee Airman 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 5711 IH

1 Lieutenant Colonel Robert J. Friend Memorial Post Office 

2 Building’’. 

3 (b) REFERENCES.—Any reference in a law, map, reg4 ulation, document, paper, or other record of the United 

5 States to the facility referred to in subsection (a) shall 

6 be deemed to be a reference to the ‘‘Tuskegee Airman 

7 Lieutenant Colonel Robert J. Friend Memorial Post Office 

8 Building’’. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
###### Editorial Note on Part 44

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 44 appear by T.D. ATF-464, 66 FR 43480, Aug. 20, 2001, and T.D. ATF-480, 67 FR 30801-30803, May 8, 2002.

#### § 44.184 Mark.

Every package of tobacco products shall, before removal from the factory under this subpart, have adequately imprinted thereon, or on a label securely affixed thereto, a mark as specified in this section. The mark may consist of the name of the manufacturer removing the product and the location (by city and State) of the factory from which the products are to be so removed, or may consist of the permit number of the factory from which the products are to be so removed. Any trade name of the manufacturer approved as provided in § 40.65 of this chapter may be used in the mark as the name of the manufacturer.) As an alternative, where tobacco products are both packaged and removed by the same manufacturer, either at the same or different factories, the mark may consist of the name of such manufacturer if the factory where package is identified on or in the package by a means approved by the appropriate TTB officer. Before using the alternative, the manufacturer shall notify the appropriate TTB officer in writing of the name to be used as the name of the manufacturer and the means to be used for identifying the factory where packaged. If approved by him the appropriate TTB officer shall return approved copies of the notice to the manufacturer. A copy of the approved notice shall be retained as part of the factory records at each of the factories operated by the manufacturer.

(72 Stat. 1422; 26 U.S.C. 5723)

[T.D. 6871, 31 FR 51, Jan. 4, 1966. Redesignated at 40 FR 16835, Apr. 15, 1975, and amended by T.D. ATF-232, 51 FR 28088, Aug. 5, 1986; T.D. ATF-243, 51 FR 43194, Dec. 1, 1986; T.D. ATF-460, 66 FR 39093, July 27, 2001]
Editorial Note on Part 28
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 28 appear by T.D. ATF-477, 67 FR 18087 through 18090, Apr. 15, 2002.

§ 28.197 Return of spirits withdrawn for export with benefit of drawback. When notice is filed by an exporter as provided in § 28.198, spirits on which the tax has been paid or determined, and which were withdrawn especially for export with benefit of drawback as provided in § 28.171, but which spirits have not been laden for export, laden for use, or deposited in a customs bonded warehouse or foreign-trade zone, may for good cause be returned under the applicable provisions of this part and 27 CFR part 19: ( a ) To the bonded premises of the distilled spirits plant for purposes authorized under 26 U.S.C.; or
( b ) To a wholesale liquor dealer; or
( c ) To a taxpaid storeroom.
The export marks on spirits returned under this section shall be removed by obliteration, relabeling or recasing. (Sec. 201, Pub. L. 85-859, 72 Stat. 1336, as amended (26 U.S.C. 5062))
[T.D. ATF-198, 50 FR 8561, Mar. 1, 1985, as amended by T.D. ATF-206, 50 FR 23956, June 7, 1985; T.D. TTB-8, 69 FR 3833, Jan. 27, 2004]
Exhibit 10.33


 


Spousal Consent


 


 


The undersigned, Ren
Xiaoheng (ID card No. 110102196309291127), is the lawful spouse of Li Weifu (ID card No. 120105195510140933). I hereby unconditionally
and irrevocably agree to the execution of the following documents (hereinafter referred to as the “Transaction Documents”)
by Li Weifu on December 28, 2014, and the disposal of the equity interests of Beijing Zhongtulian Culture & Education Development
Center (“ZTL”) and Shenzhen Asia-Pacific Future Education Technology Development Co., Ltd. (“APFE”)
held by Li Weifu and registered in his name according to the following documents:


 


		(1)	Equity Interest Disposal Restriction Agreement entered into between The Future Leading
                                                               Education (Shenzhen) Co., Ltd. (hereinafter referred to as the “WFOE”) and ZTL;



 


		(2)	Exclusive Option Agreement entered into between the WFOE and ZTL;



 


		(3)	Power of Attorney regarding shareholding in ZTL executed by Li Weifu



 


		(4)	Equity Interest Pledge Agreement entered into between the WFOE and APFE;



 


		(5)	Exclusive Option Agreement entered into between the WFOE and APFE; and



 


		(6)	Power of Attorney regarding shareholding in APFE executed by Li Weifu;



 


I hereby undertake
not to make any assertions in connection with the equity interests of ZTL and APFE which are held by Li Weifu. I hereby further
confirm that Li Weifu can perform the Transaction Documents and further amend or terminate the Transaction Documents absent authorization
or consent from me.


 


I hereby undertake
to execute all necessary documents and take all necessary actions to ensure appropriate performance of the Transaction Documents
(as amended form time to time).


 


I hereby agree and
undertake that if I obtain any equity interests of ZTL and/or APFE which are held by Li Weifu for any reasons, I shall be bound
by the Transaction Documents and the Exclusive Business Cooperation Agreement entered into between the WFOE and ZTL and APFE respectively
as of December 28, 2014 (“Exclusive Business Cooperation Agreement”) (as amended from time to time) and comply
with the obligations thereunder as a shareholder of ZTL and/or APFE. For this purpose, upon the WFOE’s request, I shall sign
a series of written documents in substantially the same format and content as the Transaction Documents and Exclusive Business
Cooperation Agreement (as amended from time to time).


 


 


/s/ Ren Xiaoheng


Ren Xiaoheng    



 


 


 


Date: April 13, 2015
Part of E.O. 12866 Review: EPA Staff Response to telephone request 

pertaining to "Regional Haze: Revisions to Provisions Governing 

Alternatives to Source -Specific Best Available Retrofit Technology (BART) 

Determinations, Limited SIP Disapprovals , and Federal Implementation 

Plans" ; RIN 2060-AR05

Phil Lorang to: Higgins, Cortney 05/04/2012 05:25 PM

Cc: Martha Keating, Rhea Jones, Tim Smith, Paula VanLare

From: Phil Lorang/RTP/USEPA/US

To: "Higgins, Cortney" <Cortney_Higgins@omb.eop.gov>

Cc: Martha Keating/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA, Rhea Jones/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA, Tim 

Smith/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA, Paula VanLare/DC/USEPA/US@EPA

Courtney,

Here are two of the items you requested in our phone call today. Others will follow.

1) Attached is a copy of the consent decree with the National Parks Conservation Association that is 

driving the scheduling of EPA's actions on Regional Haze SIPs. This copy has annotations in ink 

indicating where there have been agreements on extending deadlines since the CD was finalized by the 

court. 

2) The states that relied on CAIR as the alternative to BART for EGUs and that have a May 30, 2012 

deadline for final EPA action to approve the SIP or adopt a FIP are the following:

Indiana, Ohio, Pennsylvania, and Virginia. In addition, although Minnesota originally did not rely on CAIR 

because it was not included in CAIR, it is now relying on CSAPR as the alternative to source-specific 

BART, and the deadline for EPA action to approve the SIP or adopt a FIP is also May 30. Finalization of 

this rule will allow EPA to meet the consent decree deadlines via the combination of EPA's approval of 

other elements of the SIPs along with the FIPs.

Consent decree with NPCA et al on Regional Haze.pdf

Phil Lorang, Senior Policy Advisor

Air Quality Policy Division, OAQPS, EPA

919-541-5463
###### Editorial Note on Part 40

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 40 appear by T.D. ATF-460, 66 FR 39094-39096, July 27, 2001; T.D. ATF-464, 66 FR 43479, Aug. 20, 2001; and T.D. TTB-91, 76 FR 5479, Feb. 1, 2011.

#### § 40.163 Semimonthly tax return periods.

Except as otherwise provided in § 40.164, the periods to be covered by semimonthly tax returns are from the 1st day of each month through the 15th day of that month and from the 16th day of each month through the last day of that month.

[T.D. TTB-89, 76 FR 3513, Jan. 20, 2011]
Exhibit 14.1


      [Letterhead of Somekh Chaikin, an Member Firm of KPMG International]


Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference into the Registration
Statement on Form S-8 (File No. 333-108510) of Koor Industries Ltd. of our
report, dated March 21, 2006, except for Note 29, as to which the date is July
2, 2006, with respect to the consolidated balance sheets of Koor Industries Ltd.
and subsidiaries as of December 31, 2005 and 2004, and the related consolidated
statements of income, shareholders' equity and cash flows for each of the years
in the three year period ended December 31, 2005, which report appears in Koor
Industries Ltd.'s Annual Report on Form 20-F for the year ended December 31,
2005 and to the reference to our firm under the heading "Selected Financial
Data" in the Form 20-F.

/s/ Somekh Chaikin

Somekh Chaikin
Certified Public Accountants (Isr.)
(An affiliated member of KPMG International)

Tel Aviv, Israel
July 10, 2006
Agreement for Sale of Goods




This Agreement for Sale of Goods is made on February 17, 2015 by and between Makkanotti Group Corp. ("Seller") with its principal place of business at 73 Larnakos Avenue, 1046 Nicosia, Cyprus and Epidorpio Confectionery, ("Buyer") with its principal place of business at 10 Kallistratous, Industrial Area, Egkomi Municipality, 2409, Nicosia, Cyprus, ("Parties") for the purchase of the goods described below ("Goods"):



Different size of paper bags of two different types: without handle with flat bottom paper bags and strung in the corner paper bags.



1.	Term. This Agreement shall begin on February 17, 2015, and the end upon
last order, unless the parties agree otherwise.



2. Delivery/ acceptance. Buyer agreed to accept the Goods in Seller's office. Buyer will give Seller 20 days' advance notice regarding the quantity requested by Buyer. Upon receipt of the request for acceptance Goods, Seller will arrange the Goods and prepare them for acceptance by Buyer in Seller's office.



3. Risk of Loss. The risk of loss from any casualty to the Goods, regardless of the cause, will be the responsibility of the Buyer once the goods have been accepted by the Buyer.



4. Acceptance. Buyer will have the right to inspect the Goods, Buyer must give writing notice to Seller of any claim for damages on account of condition, quality, or grade of the goods, and Buyer must specify the basis of the claim in detail. Failure of Buyer to comply with these conditions will constitute irrevocable acceptance of the goods by Buyer.



 
Page 1








5. Charges. Buyer shall provide Purchase Order to Seller upon and for each order. Buyer shall pay half of charges in advance and another half on terms of Net 30 Days Receipt of Goods, unless the parties agree otherwise.



6. Warranty. Seller warrants that the goods sold hereunder are new and free from substantive defects. Seller's liability under the foregoing warranty is limited to replacement of goods or refund of the purchase price at Seller's sole option. No other warranty, express or implied, is made by Seller.



9. Force Majeure. Seller may, without liability, delay performance or cancel this Agreement on account of force majeure events or other circumstances beyond its control, including, but not limited to, strikes, acts of God, political unrest, terrorism, embargo, failure of source of supply, or casualty.



10. Miscellaneous. This Agreement contains the entire agreement between the parties and supersedes and replaces all such prior agreements with respect to matters expressly set forth herein. No modification shall be made to this Agreement except in writing and signed by both parties. This Agreement shall be binding upon the parties and their respective heirs, executors, administrators, successors, assigns and personal representatives.



IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have executed this Agreement as of the day and year first above written.









	
SIGNATURE AND NAME OF SELLER, 




/s/Anna Ioannou




Makkanotti Group Corp. 


	
SIGNATURE AND NAME OF BUYER, 




/s/Helen Manolis




Epidorpio Confectionery
















 
Page 2
### §§4811, 4812. Repealed. Pub. L. 103–382, title III, §365, Oct. 20, 1994, 108 Stat. 3975

Section 4811, Pub. L. 100–297, title III, §3211, Apr. 28, 1988, 102 Stat. 338, authorized grants and contracts to improve educational opportunities for, and the performance of, elementary and secondary school students and teachers.

Section 4812, Pub. L. 100–297, title III, §3212, Apr. 28, 1988, 102 Stat. 339, related to applications for grants.
### Part B—General Administrative Provisions
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY HIGH

 376

 370

 365

 350

 308

 299

 277

 271

 261

 262

 252

 253

 254

 254

 256

 256

 260

 263

 268

 270

 273

 279

 268

 269

 271

 274

 279

 279

 309

 307

 314

 315

 307

 302

 290

 281

 268

 251

 240

 231

 229

 235

 230

 234

 237

 244

 243

 246

 247

 248

 250

 254

 254

 250

 253

 255

 255

 257

 257

 257

 257

 260

 337

 329

 324

 311

 296

 283

 264

 255

 246

 245

 242

 242

 244

 247

 250

 249

 251

 253

 257

 259

 261

 265

 261

 260

 261

 263

 263

 264

 273

 274

 274

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

MARCH 2009 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: April 1, 2009

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

14 DAY

ACCUM

MEAN

14 DAY

AVG

MEAN

 7,292

 6,783

 6,272

 5,919

 5,606

 5,326

 5,065

 4,822

 4,595

 4,399

 4,224

 4,080

 3,964

 3,865

 3,778

 3,698

 3,625

 3,567

 3,528

 3,504

 3,501

 3,511

 3,526

 3,541

 3,560

 3,581

 3,600

 3,617

 3,640

 3,665

 3,688

 521

 485

 448

 423

 400

 380

 362

 344

 328

 314

 302

 291

 283

 276

 270

 264

 259

 255

 252

 250

 250

 251

 252

 253

 254

 256

 257

 258

 260

 262

 263

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

JERSEY POINT TOP ON THE SAN JOAQUIN RIVER
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

DAY ELEV

 1,007.12

 1,006.94

 1,006.68

 1,006.51

 1,006.36

 1,006.15

 1,005.98

 1,005.83

 1,005.63

 1,005.41

 1,005.13

 1,004.67

 1,004.46

 1,004.41

 1,004.14

 1,003.65

 1,003.33

 1,003.18

 1,003.04

 1,002.54

 1,002.23

 1,001.77

 1,001.27

 1,000.82

 1,000.51

 1,000.18

 999.84

 999.56

 999.28

 998.94

 1,537.5

 1,535.8

 1,533.3

 1,531.7

 1,530.3

 1,528.3

 1,526.7

 1,525.3

 1,523.4

 1,521.4

 1,518.7

 1,514.4

 1,512.5

 1,512.0

 1,509.5

 1,504.9

 1,501.9

 1,500.6

 1,499.2

 1,494.6

 1,491.7

 1,487.5

 1,482.9

 1,478.7

 1,475.9

 1,472.8

 1,469.7

 1,467.1

 1,464.6

 1,461.5

STORAGE

-1.4

-1.7

-2.4

-1.6

-1.4

-2.0

-1.6

-1.4

-1.9

-2.1

-2.6

-4.3

-2.0

-0.5

-2.5

-4.6

-3.0

-1.4

-1.3

-4.6

-2.9

-4.3

-4.6

-4.2

-2.9

-3.0

-3.1

-2.6

-2.6

-3.1

CHANGE

750

858

801

772

955

712

798

950

865

910

669

879

833

1,062

730

757

823

992

801

706

991

828

506

742

998

843

562

531

565

524

INFLOW

 1,372

 1,627

 1,968

 1,524

 1,615

 1,666

 1,550

 1,592

 1,750

 1,886

 1,941

 2,975

 1,743

 1,231

 1,942

 2,986

 2,250

 1,597

 1,356

 2,957

 2,365

 2,905

 2,756

 2,765

 2,365

 2,362

 2,077

 1,751

 1,773

 2,005

POWER

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

SPILL

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

OUTLET

 92

 88

 67

 55

 52

 43

 55

 67

 61

 64

 52

 73

 79

 66

 60

 72

 75

 99

 102

 87

 75

 69

 78

 69

 71

 12

 59

 74

 86

 89

C.F.S.

 .30

 .29

 .22

 .18

 .17

 .14

 .18

 .22

 .20

 .21

 .17

 .24

 .26

 .22

 .20

 .24

 .25

 .33

 .34

 .29

 .25

 .23

 .26

 .23

 .24

 .04

 .20

 .25

 .29

 .30

INCHES

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .13

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

PRECIP

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

APRIL 2021 NEW MELONES LAKE DAILY OPERATIONS RUN DATE: May 6, 2021

IN LAKE

EVAPORATION

INCHES

C.F.S.

COMPUTED*

1000 ACRE-FEET

RELEASE - C.F.S.

TOTALS -77.6 23,713 60,652 0 0 2,091 6.94 .13

ACRE-FEET -77,600 47,035 120,303 0 0 4,147

COMMENTS:

* COMPUTED INFLOW IS THE SUM OF CHANGE IN STORAGE, RELEASES AND EVAPORATION.

SUMMARY

RELEASE (ACRE-FEET)

POWER 120,303

SPILL 0

OUTLET

TOTAL

 0

 120,303

PRECIPITATION

THIS MONTH =

TO DATE =

 .13

JULY 1, 2020 16.81

 1,538.9

Table 13 

OCT 1, 2020 TO DATE = 16.78
Fact Sheet: Summary of the Mountain Lakes Fishery Management 

Plan/FEIS

Fishing will continue in each unit of North Cascades National Park Service Complex (North 

Cascades National Park, Ross Lake National Recreation Area, and Lake Chelan National 

Recreation Area). A valid state fishing license is required.

The purpose of the Mountain Lakes Fishery Management Plan is to guide cooperative 

fishery management actions by the National Park Service and Washington Department of Fish 

and Wildlife in order to: 

Conserve native biological integrity;

Provide a spectrum of recreational opportunities and visitor experiences, including sport 

fishing; and

Resolve the long-standing debate and conflict over fish stocking in the naturally fishless 

mountain lakes in North Cascades National Park Service Complex.

The Mountain Lakes Fishery Management Plan applies the results of long-term research of

the ecological effects of fish stocking as directed by the Director of the National Park Service in 

1986 and by the Assistant Secretary of the Interior for Fish and Wildlife and Parks in 1987. The 

plan also satisfies the terms of the 1991 Consent Decree between the North Cascades 

Conservation Council and the National Park Service.

The geographic scope of the Mountain Lakes Fishery Management Plan includes all natural 

mountain lakes within North Cascades National Park Service Complex with a history of fish 

stocking. There are 245 natural mountain lakes within the Complex; the 91 lakes with a history 

of fish stocking were considered under the plan. The 154 other lakes that have no history of fish 

stocking were not considered for future stocking. 

The Mountain Lakes Fishery Management Plan is based on more than 10 years of research 

regarding the ecological impacts of fish stocking within the North Cascades ecosystem. The 

plan was developed via unprecedented collaboration between the National Park Service and the 

State of Washington. 

The Mountain Lakes Fishery Management Plan will restore the naturally fishless mountain 

lakes by ceasing stocking and removing reproducing populations of fish where feasible to do so. 

Lake restoration will initially involve removal of reproducing fish populations from 7 lakes using 

gill nets, spawning habitat exclusion, and experimental application of the piscicide antimycin (in 

lower and Middle Blum Lakes). For more information on lake restoration, please refer to the 

Fact Sheet: Mountain Lakes Restoration.

Contacts

Chip Jenkins, Superintendent: 360.854.7200

Ashley Rawhouser: 360.854.7317
#### Dixon National Bank et al. v. Omaha National Bank.

Filed May 4, 1898.

No. 8056.

1. Garnishment: Review oe Proceedings. Proceedings in garnishment after judgment are reviewable by petition in error, and not' by appeal.

2. Proceeding in Error: Time. A proceeding in error must be commenced in the supreme court within one year from the date of the judgment or final order sought to be reviewed.

Error and appeal from the district court of Douglas county. Tried below before Scott, J.

*Appellate proceedings distressed.*

*Byron G. Burbank,*for plaintiffs in error.

*Paul Charlton, contra.*

Norval, J.

This was a proceeding in garnishment after judgment. From an order of the district court sustaining the garnishment proceedings on behalf of the Omaha National *797Bank an appeal was prosecuted to this court by the garnishee, Frank E. Moores, and the interveners, the Dixon National Bank of Dixon, Illinois, the Thompson National Bank of-Thompson, Connecticut, and the Middleborough National Bank of Middle-borough, Massachusetts. Subsequently said garnishee and interveners filed a petition in error.

The order of the court below which is now assailed was made in a law action, and cannot be reviewed by appeal. *(Nebraska Loan & Trust Co. v. Lincoln & B. H. R. Co.*53 Neb. 246; *Nebraska Wesleyan University v. Craig’s Estate,*54 Neb. 173; *Campbell v. Farmers & Merchants Bank of Elk Creek,*49 Neb. 143.)

The petition in error must be dismissed, since the same was filed in this court more than one year subsequent to the making of the order sought to be reviewed. *(Rogers v. Redick,*10 Neb. 332; *Patterson v. Woodland,*28 Neb. 250; *Clark v. Morgan,*21 Neb. 673; *Chapman v. Allen,*33 Neb. 129; *Scarborough v. Myrick,*47 Neb. 794; *Hansen v. Kinney,*46 Neb. 207; *Record v. Butters,*42 Neb. 786.)

Dismissed.-
TREATIES AND OTHER INTERNATIONAL ACTS SERIES 03-821 

________________________________________________________________________ 

ENVIRONMENTAL COOPERATION 

GLOBE Program 

 Agreement Between the 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA 

and RWANDA 

Signed at Kigali August 21, 2003 
 NOTE BY THE DEPARTMENT OF STATE 

 Pursuant to Public Law 89—497, approved July 8, 1966 

(80 Stat. 271; 1 U.S.C. 113)—

“. . .the Treaties and Other International Acts Series issued 

under the authority of the Secretary of State shall be competent 

 evidence . . . of the treaties, international agreements other than 

treaties, and proclamations by the President of such treaties and 

international agreements other than treaties, as the case may be, 

therein contained, in all the courts of law and equity and of maritime 

jurisdiction, and in all the tribunals and public offices of the 

United States, and of the several States, without any further proof 

or authentication thereof.” 
RWANDA 

Environmental Cooperation: GLOBE Program 

Agreement signed at Kigali August 21, 2003; 

 Entered into force August 21, 2003.