alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
* Pursuant to 5 T H C IR

. R. 47.5 the Court has determined that this

opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under

the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 97-41282

Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

ROCKY BERT COZZENS,

Defendant-Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the

Eastern District of Texas

(1:96-CR-61-1)

July 20, 1998

Before KING, GARWOOD and SMITH, Circuit Judges. *

PER CURIAM:

Rocky Bert Cozzens appeals the sentence he received after his

case was remanded for resentencing. He argues that the district

court abused its discretion in departing upward. Specifically, he

contends that the district court gave inadequate reasons for

departing upward and that the extent of the departure was

unreasonable. After reviewing the record and the briefs of the2

parties, we hold that the district court did not abuse its

discretion in departing upward. See United States v. Ashburn , 38

F.3d 803, 807 (5th Cir. 1994) (en banc). The district court gave

acceptable reasons for departing upward. S ee United States v.

Laury , 985 F.2d 1293, 1310 (5th Cir. 1993). Likewise, the extent

of the departure was reasonable. S ee United States v. Chappell

, 6

F.3d 1095, 1102 (5th Cir. 1993); Laury , 985 F.2d at 1310-11.

Further, on the prior appeal we held that “the district court

gave adequate reasons for departure upward.” U nited States v.

Cozzens , No. 96-41223 (5th Cir. Aug. 1, 1997) (unpublished). The

reasons given at resentencing were essentially the same, only even

more adequate. Moreover, on resentencing the district court

complied fully and properly with our prior opinion requiring it to

“explain how it arrived at a sentence of 5 0 months”

— — likewise

imposed on resentencing

—— and reflect that it had “con sidered

guideline ranges for higher offense levels.” I d

. S ee United

States v. Marmolejo

, 139 F.3d 528, 531 (5th Cir. 1998). In any

event, even apart from Marmolejo

, it is clear that the instant

appeal is wholly lacking in any merit.

AFFIRMED
###### Editorial Note on Part 40

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 40 appear by T.D. ATF-460, 66 FR 39094-39096, July 27, 2001; T.D. ATF-464, 66 FR 43479, Aug. 20, 2001; and T.D. TTB-91, 76 FR 5479, Feb. 1, 2011.

#### § 40.33 Cross reference.

For additional rules pertaining to liability for special tax, filing special tax returns, issuance and examination of special (occupational) tax stamps, and notification of changes to special tax stamps, see subpart D of part 46 of this chapter.

[T.D. TTB-79, 74 FR 37419, July 28, 2009]
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY ELEV

 1,020.75

 1,020.46

 1,020.13

 1,019.83

 1,019.52

 1,019.33

 1,018.97

 1,018.67

 1,018.32

 1,018.00

 1,017.73

 1,017.33

 1,016.99

 1,016.67

 1,016.38

 1,016.00

 1,015.68

 1,015.38

 1,015.00

 1,014.64

 1,014.37

 1,014.10

 1,013.76

 1,013.43

 1,013.09

 1,012.49

 1,012.17

 1,011.81

 1,011.48

 1,011.19

 1,010.90

 1,669.4

 1,666.5

 1,663.2

 1,660.3

 1,657.2

 1,655.3

 1,651.8

 1,648.8

 1,645.4

 1,642.2

 1,639.6

 1,635.6

 1,632.3

 1,629.2

 1,626.4

 1,622.6

 1,619.5

 1,616.6

 1,612.9

 1,609.4

 1,606.8

 1,604.2

 1,600.9

 1,597.7

 1,594.4

 1,588.6

 1,585.6

 1,582.1

 1,578.9

 1,576.1

 1,573.4

STORAGE

-3.9

-2.9

-3.3

-3.0

-3.1

-1.9

-3.6

-3.0

-3.4

-3.1

-2.6

-3.9

-3.3

-3.1

-2.8

-3.7

-3.1

-2.9

-3.7

-3.5

-2.6

-2.6

-3.3

-3.2

-3.3

-5.8

-3.1

-3.5

-3.2

-2.8

-2.8

CHANGE

457

602

747

742

901

864

547

610

703

555

663

618

599

585

676

706

562

666

542

572

667

628

552

633

735

-985

718

645

703

636

629

INFLOW

 2,293

 1,929

 2,274

 2,097

 2,295

 1,657

 2,215

 1,994

 2,324

 2,000

 1,903

 2,484

 2,176

 2,050

 1,949

 2,435

 2,003

 2,031

 2,313

 2,213

 1,884

 1,829

 2,107

 2,124

 2,276

 1,798

 2,140

 2,249

 2,150

 1,909

 1,891

POWER

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

SPILL

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

OUTLET

 116

 122

 122

 141

 150

 153

 124

 105

 115

 143

 95

 111

 104

 111

 155

 142

 129

 107

 94

 119

 103

 119

 103

 116

 115

 131

 131

 140

 149

 130

 139

C.F.S.

 .36

 .38

 .38

 .44

 .47

 .48

 .39

 .33

 .36

 .45

 .30

 .35

 .33

 .35

 .49

 .45

 .41

 .34

 .30

 .38

 .33

 .38

 .33

 .37

 .37

 .42

 .42

 .45

 .48

 .42

 .45

INCHES

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

PRECIP

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

JULY 2007 NEW MELONES LAKE DAILY OPERATIONS RUN DATE: September 26, 2007

IN LAKE

EVAPORATION

INCHES

C.F.S.

COMPUTED*

1000 ACRE-FEET

RELEASE - C.F.S.

TOTALS -100.0 18,478 64,992 0 0 3,834 12.16 .00

ACRE-FEET -100,000 36,651 128,912 0 0 7,605

COMMENTS:

SUMMARY

RELEASE (ACRE-FEET)

POWER 128,912

SPILL 0

OUTLET

TOTAL

 0

 128,912

PRECIPITATION

THIS MONTH =

TO DATE =

 .00

JULY 1, 2007 .00

 1,673.2

Table 13
###### Editorial Note on Part 555

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 555 appear by T.D. ATF-487, 68 FR 3748, Jan. 24, 2003.

#### § 555.48 Abandoned application.

Upon receipt of an incomplete or improperly executed application, the applicant will be notified of the deficiency in the application. If the application is not corrected and returned within 30 days following the date of notification, the application will be considered as having been abandoned and the license or permit fee returned.
#### George T. Spaulding, Respondent, v. Willis N. Britton, Appellant.

Judgment and order reversed and new trial granted, with costs to appellant to abide event. Held, that the verdict was grossly excessive, and that while it was within the discretion of the trial court to grant a new trial unless the plaintiff stipulated to reduce the verdict *(Holmes*v. Jones, 121 N. Y. 461, 467; *Riker*v. *Clopton,*83 App. Div. 310), the exercise of that discretion in this case failed to purge the verdict of its excessive attributes. All concurred, Robson and Merrell, JJ., upon the ground also that the complaint does not state facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action, except Kruse, P. J., who dissented and voted for affirmance.
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Jose Mario BERNABE-DIAZ, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 05-41521

Conference Calendar.

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.

June 21, 2006.

James Lee Turner, John Richard Berry, Assistant U.S. Attomies, U.S. Attorney’s Office Southern District of Texas, Houston, TX, for Plaintiff-Appellee.

Marjorie A. Meyers, Federal Public Defender, H. Michael Sokolow, Michael L. Herman, Federal Public Defender’s Office Southern District of Texas, Houston, TX, for Defendant-Appellant.

Before STEWART, DENNIS, and OWEN, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: *

Jose Mario Bernabe-Diaz (Bernabe) appeals his guilty plea conviction and sentence for illegal reentry into the United States. He argues that the “felony” and “aggravated felony” provisions of 8 U.S.C. § 1326(b)(1) and (2) are unconstitutional in light of *Apprendi v. New Jersey,*530 U.S. *346466, 120 S.Ct. 2348, 147 L.Ed.2d 435 (2000). His constitutional challenge is foreclosed by *Almendarez-Torres v. United States,*523 U.S. 224, 235, 118 S.Ct. 1219, 140 L.Ed.2d 350 (1998). Although Bernabe contends that *Almendarez-Torres*was incorrectly decided and that a majority of the Supreme Court would overrule *Almendarez-Torres*in light of *Apprendi,*we have repeatedly rejected such arguments on the basis that *Almendarez-Torres*remains binding. *See United States v. Garza-Lopez,*410 F.3d 268, 276 (5th Cir.), *cert. denied,*— U.S.-, 126 S.Ct. 298, 163 L.Ed.2d 260 (2005). Bernabe properly concedes that his argument is foreclosed in light of *Almendarez-Torres*and circuit precedent, but he raises it here to preserve it for further review. Because Bernabe has shown no error in the judgment of the district court, that judgment is AFFIRMED.

*

 Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.
###### Editorial Note on Part 26

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 26 appear by T.D. ATF-451, 66 FR 21668, 21669, May 1, 2001.

#### § 26.118 Inspection by district director of customs at port of arrival.

On receipt of properly executed TTB Form 5170.7 from the shipper and the copies of TTB Form 5170.7 from the district director of customs in Puerto Rico, the district director of customs at the port of arrival shall inspect the merchandise to determine whether the quantity specified on the TTB Form 5170.7 is contained in the shipment. He will then execute his certificate on each copy of TTB Form 5170.7 received and indicate thereon any exceptions found at the time of discharge. The statement of exceptions should show the serial number of each case or other shipping container which sustained a loss, the quantity of liquor reported shipped in such container and the quantity lost. Losses occurring as the result of missing bottles, cases, or other containers should be listed separately from empty containers and containers which have sustained losses due to breakage. Where the statement is made on the basis of bottles missing or lost due to other cause, the number and size of bottles lost should be shown. If the district director of customs finds that the full amount of the taxes due has not been paid, he will require the difference due to be paid prior to release of the merchandise in accordance with the applicable provisions of this part. When the proper inspection of the merchandise has been effected, and any additional taxes found to be due on the liquors or articles collected, the merchandise will be released.

[20 FR 6077, Aug. 20, 1955, as amended by T.D. 7006, 34 FR 2249, Feb. 15, 1969. Redesignated at 40 FR 16835, Apr. 15, 1975. T.D. ATF-451, 66 FR 21669, May 1, 2001; T.D. TTB-146, 82 FR 1134, Jan. 4, 2017]
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except

under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

November 9, 2006

Charles R. Fulbruge III

Clerk

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 05-20963

Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

LEONEL ANDAYA,

Defendant-Appellant.

--------------------

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Texas

USDC No. 4:02-CR-690-3

--------------------

Before BARKSDALE, DeMOSS, and PRADO, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Appealing the Judgment in a Criminal Case, Leonel Andaya

raises arguments that are foreclosed by United States v.

Slaughter, 238 F.3d 580, 582-84 (5th Cir. 2000), which held that

Apprendi v. New Jersey, 530 U.S. 466 (2000), did not render

21 U.S.C. § 841 unconstitutional on its face. The Government’s

motion for summary affirmance is GRANTED, and the judgment of the

district court is AFFIRMED.
-       - Superintendent of Documents
      - 2023-09-01T18:03:24-0400
      - Government Publishing Office, Washington, DC 20401
      - Government Publishing Office
      - Government Publishing Office attests that this document has not been altered since it was disseminated by Government Publishing Office
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY ELEV

 122.99

 123.60

 123.52

 123.76

 123.68

 123.38

 123.02

 123.39

 123.47

 123.97

 123.62

 124.16

 124.38

 124.11

 123.74

 123.30

 123.08

 122.79

 123.37

 123.29

 123.34

 123.56

 123.68

 123.68

 123.27

 123.41

 123.85

 123.93

 124.03

 123.69

 123.75

 7,787

 8,073

 8,035

 8,148

 8,111

 7,970

 7,800

 7,974

 8,012

 8,247

 8,082

 8,341

 8,451

 8,316

 8,139

 7,932

 7,829

 7,697

 7,965

 7,927

 7,951

 8,054

 8,111

 8,111

 7,918

 7,984

 8,191

 8,228

 8,276

 8,115

 8,144

STORAGE

-112

+286

-38

+113

-37

-141

-170

+174

+38

+235

-165

+259

+110

-135

-177

-207

-103

-132

+268

-38

+24

+103

+57

+0

-193

+66

+207

+37

+48

-161

+29

CHANGE

2,002

2,205

2,047

2,115

2,046

1,990

1,956

2,136

2,029

2,121

1,914

2,040

2,058

1,946

1,948

1,930

1,980

2,043

2,302

2,151

2,189

2,143

2,074

2,041

1,943

2,079

2,131

2,041

2,052

1,949

2,045

INFLOW

 1,937

 1,937

 1,940

 1,932

 1,940

 1,935

 1,464

 1,925

 1,937

 1,942

 1,534

 1,453

 1,939

 1,933

 1,940

 1,933

 1,938

 770

 292

 292

 292

 783

 1,940

 1,936

 1,935

 1,941

 1,924

 1,922

 1,928

 1,930

 1,933

POWER

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 452

 0

 0

 0

 403

 396

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 1,249

 1,784

 1,787

 1,784

 1,203

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

SPILL

 60

 60

 60

 60

 60

 60

 60

 60

 60

 60

 60

 60

 60

 60

 60

 60

 60

 60

 60

 60

 60

 60

 60

 60

 60

 60

 60

 60

 60

 60

 60

HATCHERY

 1

 1

 1

 1

 0

 1

 1

 1

 0

 1

 0

 0

 0

 1

 0

 1

 0

 1

 1

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

C.F.S.

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

DECEMBER 2006 LAKE NATOMA DAILY OPERATIONS RUN DATE: April 11, 2007

IN LAKE

EVAP

C.F.S.

COMPUTED*

ACRE-FEET

RELEASE - C.F.S.

TOTALS +245 63,646 51,377 9,058 1,860 12

ACRE-FEET +245 126,242 101,906 17,967 3,689 24

COMMENTS:

* COMPUTED INFLOW IS THE SUM OF CHANGE IN STORAGE, RELEASES AND EVAPORATION.

SUMMARY

RELEASES (ACRE-FEET)

POWER 101,906

SPILL 17,967

FOLSOM SOUTH CANAL

HATCHERY

 2,410

 3,689

 7,899

FOLSOM

SOUTH 

 60

 63

 65

 65

 65

 65

 65

 62

 13

 0

 0

 0

 4

 20

 37

 40

 34

 30

 30

 31

 41

 45

 45

 45

 45

 45

 43

 40

 40

 40

 37

 1,215

 2,410

(1)

(1) INCHES OF EVAPORATION TAKEN FROM FOLSOM PAN.

RELEASES (ACRE-FEET) 

TOTAL 125,972

Table 12
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

DAY ELEV

 498.39

 499.02

 499.36

 499.89

 500.29

 500.95

 501.63

 502.19

 502.47

 502.93

 503.58

 504.29

 504.83

 505.10

 505.30

 505.68

 506.37

 507.27

 508.21

 509.10

 509.86

 510.58

 511.40

 512.27

 513.18

 514.15

 515.00

 515.76

 516.51

 210.9

 212.8

 213.8

 215.3

 216.5

 218.4

 220.5

 222.1

 223.0

 224.4

 226.3

 228.5

 230.1

 231.0

 231.6

 232.7

 234.9

 237.7

 240.6

 243.4

 245.8

 248.1

 250.8

 253.6

 256.5

 259.7

 262.5

 265.0

 267.5

STORAGE

+2.6

+1.8

+1.0

+1.6

+1.2

+1.9

+2.0

+1.7

+0.8

+1.4

+2.0

+2.2

+1.6

+0.8

+0.6

+1.2

+2.1

+2.8

+2.9

+2.8

+2.4

+2.3

+2.6

+2.8

+3.0

+3.2

+2.8

+2.5

+2.5

CHANGE

1,443

1,028

711

1,048

858

1,130

1,121

945

517

806

1,122

1,237

982

569

470

807

1,330

1,659

1,758

1,714

1,647

1,528

1,617

1,716

1,785

1,902

1,694

1,549

1,547

INFLOW

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

MADERA

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

SPILL

 0

 0

 116

 170

 171

 57

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 142

 72

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

FRIANT-KERN

 5

 4

 5

 7

 5

 3

 13

 15

 6

 7

 11

 12

 7

 7

 5

 8

 20

 12

 7

 12

 2

 11

 6

 14

 8

 19

 11

 5

 13

C.F.S.

 .05

 .04

 .05

 .07

 .05

 .03

 .14

 .15

 .06

 .07

 .11

 .12

 .07

 .07

 .05

 .08

 .20

 .12

 .07

 .12

 .02

 .11

 .06

 .13

 .08

 .18

 .10

 .05

 .12

INCHES

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .28

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

PRECIP

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

FEBRUARY 2016 MILLERTON LAKE DAILY OPERATIONS RUN DATE: March 1, 2016

IN LAKE

EVAPORATION

INCHES

C.F.S.

COMPUTED*

1000 ACRE-FEET

RELEASE - C.F.S. 

TOTALS +59.2 36,240 0 728 0 260 2.57 .28

ACRE-FEET +59,188 71,882 0 1,444 0 516

COMMENTS:

* COMPUTED INFLOW IS THE SUM OF CHANGE IN STORAGE, RELEASES, PUMPING AND EVAPORATION.

SUMMARY

RELEASE (ACRE-FEET)

CANALS

FRIANT-KERN

MADERA

 1,444

 0 12,181

PRECIPITATION

THIS MONTH =

JULY 1, 2015 TO DATE = 13.09

 208.3

 10,737 0.28

CANALS

AT FRIANT

TOTAL RELEASES

OUTLET

 126

 101

 88

 88

 88

 88

 88

 88

 88

 103

 120

 138

 145

 145

 155

 210

 235

 236

 267

 286

 286

 287

 286

 287

 287

 282

 271

 272

 272

RIVER

 5,413

 10,737

RIVER
###### Editorial Note on Part 46

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 46 appear by T.D. ATF-457, 66 FR 32220, 32221, June 14, 2001.

#### § 46.264 Withdrawal of an approval.

The approval will be withdrawn if revenue is jeopardized or administration of this subpart is hindered. The appropriate TTB officer will give the dealer a written notice of the withdrawal.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY ELEV

 562.35

 561.08

 559.48

 557.84

 556.33

 555.00

 553.69

 552.45

 550.80

 549.37

 548.05

 546.75

 545.75

 544.53

 543.42

 542.47

 541.16

 540.00

 539.00

 537.90

 536.57

 535.42

 534.29

 532.91

 531.96

 531.00

 530.22

 529.46

 528.82

 527.66

 526.28

 447.0

 441.3

 434.2

 427.0

 420.4

 414.6

 409.0

 403.7

 396.8

 390.8

 385.3

 380.0

 375.9

 371.0

 366.5

 362.7

 357.5

 353.0

 349.0

 344.8

 339.6

 335.2

 330.9

 325.7

 322.2

 318.6

 315.8

 313.0

 310.6

 306.4

 301.4

STORAGE

-7.4

-5.7

-7.1

-7.2

-6.6

-5.8

-5.6

-5.3

-7.0

-6.0

-5.5

-5.3

-4.1

-4.9

-4.5

-3.8

-5.2

-4.6

-3.9

-4.3

-5.1

-4.4

-4.3

-5.2

-3.5

-3.6

-2.9

-2.8

-2.3

-4.2

-5.0

CHANGE

2,236

3,129

2,415

2,403

2,651

2,830

2,849

2,972

2,165

2,660

2,705

2,346

2,473

1,934

2,278

2,606

2,106

2,666

2,938

2,551

2,260

2,809

2,745

2,185

2,873

2,548

2,281

2,395

2,976

2,229

1,886

INFLOW

 1,029

 1,050

 1,054

 1,072

 1,057

 1,043

 1,028

 949

 834

 788

 797

 819

 830

 649

 622

 657

 648

 684

 712

 677

 659

 678

 667

 639

 657

 665

 648

 632

 660

 708

 683

MADERA

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

SPILL

 4,638

 4,643

 4,647

 4,674

 4,581

 4,381

 4,355

 4,386

 4,506

 4,539

 4,295

 3,857

 3,358

 3,443

 3,601

 3,526

 3,748

 3,950

 3,889

 3,702

 3,863

 4,025

 3,920

 3,838

 3,681

 3,348

 2,762

 2,858

 3,166

 3,339

 3,399

FRIANT-KERN

 65

 66

 56

 61

 93

 68

 59

 59

 72

 58

 72

 64

 42

 33

 17

 54

 47

 51

 34

 50

 46

 47

 43

 49

 45

 52

 41

 37

 57

 36

 39

C.F.S.

 .45

 .46

 .39

 .43

 .66

 .49

 .43

 .43

 .53

 .43

 .54

 .48

 .32

 .25

 .13

 .42

 .37

 .40

 .27

 .40

 .37

 .38

 .35

 .40

 .37

 .43

 .34

 .31

 .48

 .31

 .34

INCHES

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .03

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

PRECIP

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

AUGUST 2005 MILLERTON LAKE DAILY OPERATIONS RUN DATE: March 7, 2006

IN LAKE

EVAPORATION

INCHES

C.F.S.

COMPUTED*

1000 ACRE-FEET

RELEASE - C.F.S. 

TOTALS -153.0 78,100 24,295 120,918 0 1,613 12.36 .03

ACRE-FEET -152,973 154,911 48,189 239,841 0 3,199

COMMENTS:

* COMPUTED INFLOW IS THE SUM OF CHANGE IN STORAGE, RELEASES, PUMPING AND EVAPORATION.

SUMMARY

RELEASE (ACRE-FEET)

CANALS

FRIANT-KERN

MADERA

 239,841

 48,189 304,683

PRECIPITATION

THIS MONTH =

JULY 1, 2005 TO DATE = 0.03

 454.4

 16,653 0.03

CANALS

AT FRIANT

TOTAL RELEASES

OUTLET

 237

 237

 239

 238

 238

 237

 236

 235

 258

 286

 303

 301

 301

 301

 289

 282

 282

 281

 280

 280

 279

 278

 278

 279

 279

 278

 278

 277

 277

 276

 276

RIVER

 8,396

 16,653

RIVER

Table 15
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

DAY HIGH

 296

 300

 307

 311

 354

 326

 333

 325

 296

 293

 274

 253

 237

 245

 273

 269

 264

 261

 0

 0

 257

 271

 270

 263

 264

 301

 361

 300

 288

 285

 202

 202

 197

 200

 196

 196

 192

 189

 187

 191

 187

 183

 180

 182

 185

 190

 188

 183

 0

 0

 175

 175

 175

 172

 173

 176

 186

 181

 178

 171

 238

 236

 232

 231

 240

 235

 238

 231

 228

 225

 213

 205

 200

 206

 219

 218

 211

 206

 0

 0

 199

 203

 203

 197

 200

 220

 238

 225

 215

 205

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

SEPTEMBER 2019 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: October 8, 2019

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

14 DAY

ACCUM

MEAN

14 DAY 

AVG

MEAN

 3,574

 3,544

 3,528

 3,521

 3,522

 3,501

 3,473

 3,444

 3,416

 3,372

 3,304

 3,241

 3,192

 3,158

 3,139

 3,121

 3,100

 3,075

 2,835

 2,600

 2,561

 2,533

 2,508

 2,480

 2,467

 2,482

 2,520

 2,539

 2,535

 2,522

 255

 253

 252

 252

 252

 250

 248

 246

 244

 241

 236

 232

 228

 226

 224

 223

 221

 220

 203

 186

 183

 181

 179

 177

 176

 177

 180

 181

 181

 180

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

JERSEY POINT TOP ON THE SAN JOAQUIN RIVER
###### Editorial Note on Part 53

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 53 appear by T.D. ATF-447, 66 FR 19088, Apr. 13, 2001.

#### § 53.162 Abatements.

For regulations under section 6404 of the Code of general application in respect of abatements of assessments to tax, see 27 CFR 70.125 (Procedure and Administration).
Editorial Note on Part 46
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 46 appear by T.D. ATF-457, 66 FR 32220, 32221, June 14, 2001.

§ 46.241 Required records. The dealer must maintain: ( a ) Inventory records;
( b ) Tax computation records;
( c ) Names, addresses and employer identification numbers of all controlled group members, if applicable;
( d ) A copy of the tax return, if the dealer filed one;
( e ) A list of locations covered by the tax return; and
( f ) A copy of any alternate method or procedure approval issued under § 46.263.
(Approved by the Office of Management and Budget under control number 1513-0129)
§ 7.145 Malt beverages containing less than 0.5 percent alcohol by volume. ( a ) Products containing less than 0.5 percent of alcohol by volume must bear the class designation “malt beverage,” “cereal beverage,” or “near beer.”
( b ) If the designation “near beer” is used, both words must appear in the same size and style of type, in the same color of ink, and on the same background.
( c ) No product containing less than 0.5 percent of alcohol by volume may bear the class designations “beer,” “lager beer,” “lager,” “ale,” “porter,” “stout,” or any other class or type designation commonly applied to malt beverages containing 0.5 percent or more of alcohol by volume.