alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

DAY ELEV

 1,901.12

 1,901.41

 1,901.50

 1,901.40

 1,901.11

 1,901.05

 1,901.25

 1,901.42

 1,901.61

 1,900.75

 1,901.50

 1,901.61

 1,901.30

 1,901.54

 1,901.66

 1,901.71

 1,901.64

 1,901.66

 1,900.48

 1,901.09

 1,901.68

 1,901.55

 1,901.60

 1,901.39

 1,901.82

 1,901.54

 1,901.30

 1,901.34

 1,901.44

 1,901.53

 14,001

 14,218

 14,285

 14,210

 13,993

 13,948

 14,098

 14,225

 14,367

 13,727

 14,285

 14,367

 14,135

 14,315

 14,405

 14,442

 14,390

 14,405

 13,528

 13,978

 14,420

 14,322

 14,360

 14,203

 14,524

 14,315

 14,135

 14,165

 14,240

 14,307

STORAGE

+15

+217

+67

-75

-217

-45

+150

+127

+142

-640

+558

+82

-232

+180

+90

+37

-52

+15

-877

+450

+442

-98

+38

-157

+321

-209

-180

+30

+75

+67

CHANGE

736

799

816

747

474

579

580

568

574

278

1,072

829

540

614

743

756

630

664

18

612

676

613

576

517

666

623

575

607

676

673

INFLOW

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

POWER

 225

 223

 225

 223

 222

 221

 220

 220

 221

 220

 223

 220

 220

 221

 220

 220

 220

 220

 220

 218

 217

 220

 219

 218

 218

 221

 219

 216

 214

 214

SPILL

 78

 78

 78

 78

 78

 78

 78

 78

 78

 78

 78

 78

 78

 78

 78

 78

 78

 78

 78

 78

 78

 78

 78

 78

 78

 78

 78

 78

 78

 78

OUTLETS

 2

 2

 1

 1

 2

 2

 2

 2

 0

 0

 0

 0

 3

 2

 1

 0

 0

 0

 1

 1

 0

 1

 0

 0

 0

 1

 0

 1

 1

 0

C.F.S.

 .10

 .10

 .06

 .05

 .10

 .10

 .11

 .08

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .14

 .11

 .06

 .02

 .00

 .00

 .04

 .03

 .00

 .06

 .02

 .00

 .00

 .05

 .00

 .05

 .04

 .02

INCHES

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

NOVEMBER 2020 LEWISTON LAKE DAILY OPERATIONS RUN DATE: December 1, 2020

IN LAKE

EVAPORATION

C.F.S. FRANCIS CARR

COMPUTED*

ACRE-FEET

RELEASE - C.F.S. 

TOTALS +321 18,831 0 2,340 6,598 26 1.34

ACRE-FEET +321 37,351 0 4,641 13,087 52

* COMPUTED INFLOW IS THE SUM OF CHANGE IN STORAGE, RELEASES AND EVAPORATION.

(1) OUTLET RELEASE INCLUDES FISH RELEASE.

(2) INCHES OF EVAPORATION TAKEN FROM PAN AT TRINITY RIVER HATCHERY.

SUMMARY

RELEASE (ACRE-FEET)

TOTAL POWER 0

TOTAL RIVER 17,728 36,974

 13,986

 19,246

RIVER

JUDGE FRANCIS CARR POWERPLANT

TOTAL RELEASE

JUDGE (2)

(1) POWERPLANT

 423

 387

 478

 483

 281

 301

 204

 204

 203

 303

 490

 490

 356

 222

 399

 439

 358

 358

 161

 88

 158

 363

 260

 300

 208

 428

 369

 297

 345

 347

 9,703

 19,246
* Local Rule 47.5.1 provides: "The publication of

opinions that merely decide particular cases on the basis of

well-settled principles of law imposes needless expense on the

public and burdens on the legal profession." Pursuant to that

Rule, the court has determined that this opinion should not be

published.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

__________________

No. 95-40482

Conference Calendar

__________________

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

 Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

MANUEL CORTEZ, JR.,

 Defendant-Appellant.

- - - - - - - - - -

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Texas

USDC No. C-94-CR-239

- - - - - - - - - -

December 19, 1995

Before DAVIS, STEWART, and PARKER, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Appellant appeals from his guilty plea conviction for

possessing marihuana with intent to distribute in violation of 18

U.S.C. § 2 and 21 U.S.C. §§ 841(a)(1) and 841(b)(1)(C). He

contends that the district court's denial of his counsel's motion

to withdraw was an abuse of discretion and violated his Sixth

Amendment right to counsel. 
No. 95-40482

-2-

We have reviewed the record and the district court's oral

ruling and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on

the reasoning of the district court. 

AFFIRMED.
Editorial Note on Part 21
Editorial Notes: Nomenclature changes to part 21 appear by T.D. ATF-435, 66 FR 5475, Jan. 19, 2001. Nomenclature changes to part 21 appear by 81 T.D. TTB-140, 81 FR Aug. 30, 2016.

§ 21.122 Potassium Hydroxide. ( a ) *Color.* White or yellow.
( b ) *Specific gravity at 20 °C.* 1.95 to 2.10.
( c ) *Melting point.* 360 °C.
( d ) *Boiling point.* 1320 °C.
( e ) *pH (0.1M solution).* 13.5.
[T.D. TTB-140, 81 FR 59462, Aug. 30, 2016]
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Herman Galler, Appellant.

Present — Close, P. J., Hagarty, Johnston, Taylor and Lewis, JJ. Insofar as the appellant asks for an order *734granting leave to appeal to the Court of Appeals, the notice will he considered as an application made to a Justice of the Appellate Division, pursuant to the provisions of subdivision 3 of section 529 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, for a certificate permitting an appeal to the Court of Appeals. The application is denied by Presiding Justice Close. [See *ante,*p. 675.]
###### Editorial Note on Part 40

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 40 appear by T.D. ATF-460, 66 FR 39094-39096, July 27, 2001; T.D. ATF-464, 66 FR 43479, Aug. 20, 2001; and T.D. TTB-91, 76 FR 5479, Feb. 1, 2011.

#### § 40.138 Approval of bond and extension of coverage of bond.

No person shall commence operations under any bond, nor extend his operations, until he receives from the appropriate TTB officer notice of his approval of the bond or of an appropriate extension of coverage of the bond required under this part.

(72 Stat. 1421; 26 U.S.C. 5711)
Exhibit 32.1

** **

** **

** **

                              Certification of CEO and CFO

**                           Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,**

**                                 As Adopted Pursuant to**

**                      Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**

 

 

 

In connection with theQuarterly Report on Form 10-Q of National Housing Partnership Realty Fund I (the"Partnership"), for the quarterly period ended September 30, 2008 as filed withthe Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), MarthaL. Long, as the equivalent of the chief executive officer of the Partnership,and Stephen B. Waters, as the equivalent of the chief financial officer of thePartnership, each hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, asadopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to thebest of his knowledge:

 

(1)   The Reportfully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2)   Theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operations of the Partnership.

 

 

 

 

This certification isfurnished with this Report pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of2002 and shall not be deemed filed by the Partnership for purposes of Section 18of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, asamended.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY ELEV

 123.49

 123.02

 122.53

 123.43

 123.91

 124.04

 123.80

 123.61

 123.26

 122.98

 123.24

 123.64

 124.13

 124.07

 123.64

 123.72

 124.28

 124.13

 124.12

 124.25

 123.94

 123.97

 123.85

 123.78

 123.70

 123.89

 123.85

 123.78

 123.55

 123.33

 123.12

 8,021

 7,800

 7,580

 7,993

 8,219

 8,281

 8,167

 8,078

 7,913

 7,782

 7,904

 8,092

 8,326

 8,296

 8,092

 8,129

 8,401

 8,326

 8,321

 8,386

 8,233

 8,247

 8,191

 8,158

 8,120

 8,209

 8,191

 8,158

 8,050

 7,946

 7,847

STORAGE

-285

-221

-220

+413

+226

+62

-114

-89

-165

-131

+122

+188

+234

-30

-204

+37

+272

-75

-5

+65

-153

+14

-56

-33

-38

+89

-18

-33

-108

-104

-99

CHANGE

4,401

4,435

4,442

4,624

4,168

4,079

3,621

3,123

2,972

2,990

3,113

2,990

2,666

2,528

2,026

2,063

2,184

2,026

2,049

2,086

1,977

2,055

2,018

2,029

2,032

2,098

2,046

2,036

1,992

2,007

2,006

INFLOW

 4,437

 4,438

 4,446

 4,308

 3,945

 3,939

 3,569

 3,059

 2,946

 2,947

 2,942

 2,333

 2,439

 2,434

 2,020

 1,936

 1,938

 1,955

 1,942

 1,945

 1,945

 1,940

 1,940

 1,938

 1,942

 1,944

 1,946

 1,944

 1,938

 1,951

 1,948

POWER

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 454

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

SPILL

 60

 60

 60

 60

 60

 60

 60

 60

 60

 60

 60

 60

 60

 60

 60

 60

 60

 60

 60

 60

 60

 60

 60

 60

 60

 60

 60

 60

 60

 60

 60

HATCHERY

 3

 3

 2

 3

 4

 4

 4

 4

 4

 4

 4

 3

 4

 4

 4

 3

 4

 4

 5

 3

 4

 3

 1

 3

 4

 4

 4

 4

 3

 3

 3

C.F.S.

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

AUGUST 2003 LAKE NATOMA DAILY OPERATIONS RUN DATE: September 25, 2003

IN LAKE

EVAP

C.F.S.

COMPUTED*

ACRE-FEET

RELEASE - C.F.S.

TOTALS -459 84,882 81,294 454 1,860 109

ACRE-FEET -459 168,363 161,247 901 3,689 216

COMMENTS:

* COMPUTED INFLOW IS THE SUM OF CHANGE IN STORAGE, RELEASES AND EVAPORATION.

SUMMARY

RELEASES (ACRE-FEET)

POWER 161,247

SPILL 901

FOLSOM SOUTH CANAL

HATCHERY

 2,767

 3,689

 8,306

FOLSOM

SOUTH 

CANAL

 45

 45

 45

 45

 45

 45

 45

 45

 45

 45

 45

 45

 45

 45

 45

 45

 45

 45

 45

 45

 45

 45

 45

 45

 45

 45

 45

 45

 45

 45

 45

 1,395

 2,767

(1)

(1) INCHES OF EVAPORATION TAKEN FROM FOLSOM PAN.

RELEASES (ACRE-FEET)

TOTAL 168,604

Table 12
```

[Congressional Bills 116th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 5603 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

116th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 5603

To provide that for purposes of determining compliance with title IX of 
the Education Amendments of 1972 in athletics, sex shall be determined 
         on the basis of sex assigned at birth by a physician.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            January 14, 2020

 Mr. Steube (for himself, Mrs. Lesko, and Mr. Hagedorn) introduced the 
 following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Education and 
                                 Labor

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To provide that for purposes of determining compliance with title IX of 
the Education Amendments of 1972 in athletics, sex shall be determined 
         on the basis of sex assigned at birth by a physician.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Protection of Women and Girls in 
Sports Act of 2020''.

SEC. 2. SEX DISCRIMINATION IN ATHLETICS.

    For purposes of determining compliance with title IX of the 
Education Amendments of 1972 (20 U.S.C. 1681-1688) in athletics, sex 
shall be determined on the basis of sex assigned at birth by a 
physician.
                                 <all>
```
Final Listing of Questionnaire Files for Steam Electric Rulemaking Record

Plant ID 07311

Removed 

from Public 

(Non-CBI) 

Docket1

Copyright 

Flag2

File Name Description

x 07311\07311_Checklist.xls EPA Technical Review Checklist Workbook

07311\07311_Completeness_Checklist.xls EPA Completeness Review Checklist

x 07311\07311_Correspondence.pdf Email communications regarding questions on the survey response

x 07311\07311_Followup.xls Draft Questions for Follow Up

07311\07311_HardcopyLog.doc EPA log of hardcopy documents submitted

x 07311\07311_Part A.xls Plant submitted survey file

x 07311\07311_Part B.xls Plant submitted survey file

x 07311\07311_Part C.xls Plant submitted survey file

x 07311\07311_Part D.xls Plant submitted survey file

x 07311\07311_Part H.xls Plant submitted survey file

07311\Certification Statement Plant ID 07311.pdf Plant certification statement

x 07311\Supplemental Documents\07311_KU-GR - D-1 Wastewater Treatment Block Diagram - 923.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey

x 07311\Supplemental Documents\07311_KU-GR - WB-1 Water Balance Block Diagram - 923.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey

07311\Supplemental Documents\07311_KU-Green River - Cover Letter.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey

07311\Supplemental Documents\07311_KU-Green River A5-2 -Aerial Map.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey

1

 Final reviewed survey responses are located in the Steam Electric Technical Questionnaire Database . 

2

 Copyright documents are available from the docket.
02/16/201011:09AM

From: To: Cc:
Archive: 

### Cathy, {In Archive} RE: Part 2 Feesevaluation Butt. Neal T. to: Catherine Penland C . "Tavarez, Isreal L ft, ftNieto.**Margaret~.** "Ziegler, Ken R.

... -Duran,

c. Angela -,

### ~Rocha, Dario W.- "Butt, Neal T." <NButt@cabq.gov> Catherine PenlandlR6IUSEPAlUS@EPA "Tavarez. Isreal L." <ITavarez@cabq.gov>,**~Nieto.** Margaret" <mnieto@cabq.gav>. "Ziegler. Ken R.ft <kr.z:iegler@cabq.gov>. ftDuran, Angela ft <aduran@cabq.gav>. ftRocha. DarioW.ft <DRacha@cabq.gov> This message is being viewed in an archive.

your are correct, this is a typo. Please change citation to read "Major source shall have the meaning defined In 

### 40 CFR 

### 70.2". I will request an administrative change from the 

### NM State Records Center.
Thanks, Neal "Everyone carries a shadow, and the less it is embodied in the individual's conscious life, the blacker and denser it is. At all counts, it forms an unconscious snag, thwarting our most well-meant intentions."

- Dr. Carl 

### G. Jung

From: Penland.Catherine@epamail.epa.gov [mailto:Penland,Catherine@epamail.epa.gov] sent: Friday, February 12, 20106:03 AM To: Butt, Neal T. Subject: Part 2 Fees evaluation
Neal, Still trying to tie up the TSD on the Pt. 2 Fees eva!. farthe 2 SIP submissions so far. Ran across something in definitions meantto askyou about and got sidetracked on otherthings. With respect to the defintion of a majorsource, yourdefinition references 40 CFR 71.2. Thatwould be 40 CFR Part 71.2 -the Title V program on Tribal and Federal lands. Why did you reference that Part, which does notapplyto state programs? Did you mean to reference 40 CFR Part 70.2? Ifso. a simple e-mail commenton typo. with intentto correct will suffice. If not, I need an explanation. Ifyou did mean to reference Pt. 71, and you will be providing an explanation, hold off, as I may need other items. as I try to finish the TSD. Hope to dothis today. so should have anyadditional itemsJquestions to you by COB today. Also. is there anyone else I need to ccon these requests? I noticed that Isreal had included a numberof otherfolks in the monthly call, and at home todayworking, so notsure ofyour newstructure· may have included your management. Thanks,Cathy Catherine G. Penland EPA Region 6 - 6PD·R 

### Phone: (214) 665-7122 Fax: (214) 665-6762 penland.catherine@epa.gov
479 P.2d 532

#### STATE of New Mexico, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Robert Joe SAMORA, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 524.

Court of Appeals of New Mexico.

Dec. 31, 1970.

Larry L. Lamb, Lamb & Metzgar, Alburquerque, for defendant-appellant.

James A. Maloney, Atty. Gen., Leila Andrews, Asst. Atty. Gen., Santa Fe, for plaintiff-appellee.

OPINION

SPIESS, Chief Judge.

The defendant, tried and convicted before a jury of the crime of burglary contrary to § 40A-16-3, N.M.S.A.1953 (1963 Supp.), urges upon appeal a single question which relates to the denial of effective assistance of appointed counsel. It is contended, in substance, that counsel’s representation was so inadequate so as to deprive defendant of due process of law and to his right to counsel under the Sixth Amendment.

The claim of ineffectiveness concerns counsel’s failure “ * * * to request an instruction to the effect that intoxication would relieve the defendant of criminal responsibility if he were unable to form the criminal intent required for the commission of the crime of burglary.”

A further claim of ineffectiveness relates to the failure of counsel to object to the following instruction.

> “You are instructed that voluntary drunkenness is no excuse or justification for crime, and in this case, notwithstanding you may believe from the evidence that at the time of the commission of the acts charged against him, the defendant was intoxicated, you are instructed that this will not constitute any defense for him and you will not acquit him on that ground.”

Evidence was offered at the time of trial from which it could be found that defendant was so intoxicated that he could not form an intent to commit burglary. The failure of counsel to proceed, as defendant now asserts he should have proceeded in connection with the instructions, may have been no more than bad strategy on the part of counsel. See State v. Hines, 78 N.M. 471, 432 P.2d 827 (1967).

We are unable to determine from this record, as a matter of law, that defendant’s representation was so inadequate as to deprive him of his constitutional right *253to the effective assistance of counsel. Accordingly, upon the record presented, the judgment should be affirmed.

It is so ordered.

WOOD and HENDLEY, JJ., concur.
United States Court of Appeals

For the Eighth Circuit

___________________________

No. 23-3079

___________________________

Susan Lloyd

lllllllllllllllllllllPlaintiff - Appellant

v.

TD Bank USA NA CO Target Enterprise Inc.; Target Corporation

lllllllllllllllllllllDefendants - Appellees

 ____________

Appeal from United States District Court 

for the District of Minnesota

 ____________

Submitted: February 15, 2024

Filed: February 21, 2024

[Unpublished]

____________

Before SHEPHERD, STRAS, and KOBES, Circuit Judges. 

____________

PER CURIAM.

Pennsylvania resident Susan Lloyd appeals the district court’s1 dismissal of her

pro se civil complaint asserting claims of discrimination under the Americans with

1The Honorable Donovan W. Frank, United States District Judge for the

District of Minnesota.
Disabilities Act (ADA) against Target Corporation, as well as federal and state claims

related to debt collection. She also challenges the district court’s denial of her motion

for leave to file a second amended complaint.

After careful review, we conclude the district court did not abuse its discretion

in dismissing Lloyd’s ADA claim without prejudice because it was misjoined. See

Stephens v. Does, 777 Fed. Appx. 176, 177 (8th Cir. 2019) (unpublished per curiam)

(standard of review). We also conclude the district court did not err in dismissing her

remaining federal and state claims under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6). 

See Christopherson v. Bushner, 33 F.4th 495, 499 (8th Cir. 2022) (standard of

review). Finally, we conclude the district court did not abuse its discretion in denying

Lloyd leave to file her second amended complaint. See In re 2007 Novastar Fin. Inc.,

Sec. Lit., 579 F.3d 878, 884-85 (8th Cir. 2009) (standard of review); Knowles v. TD

Ameritrade Holding Corp., 2 F.4th 751, 758 (8th Cir. 2021) (affirming denial of leave

to amend and with-prejudice dismissal where, despite previous amendments, plaintiff

unable to plead adequate claim).

The judgment is affirmed. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.

______________________________

-2-
1The Honorable Henry Woods, United States District Judge for the Eastern

District of Arkansas.

United States Court of Appeals

FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________

No. 00-1743

___________

United States of America, *

*

Appellee, *

*

v. * Appeal from the United States

* District Court for the

Bob D. J. Kranick, * Eastern District of Arkansas.

*

Appellant. * [UNPUBLISHED]

___________

 Submitted: January 23, 2001

 Filed: February 1, 2001 

___________

Before HANSEN, MORRIS SHEPPARD ARNOLD, and BYE, Circuit Judges.

___________

PER CURIAM.

Bob Kranick pleaded guilty to kidnaping, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1201(a)(1),

and the district court1 sentenced him to 110 months imprisonment and 5 years

supervised release. Kranick appeals his sentence.

Having carefully reviewed the record and the parties’ briefs, we affirm the

judgment of the district court. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.
-2-

A true copy.

Attest:

CLERK, U.S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.
#### Henry Sauerbrunn v. Hartford Life Insurance Company.

Motion denied, with ten dollars costs. Present — Ingraham, P. J., Clarke, Scott, Dowling and Hotchkiss, JJ. .
### §1070c–4. "Community service" defined

For the purpose of this subpart, the term "community service" means services, including direct service, planning, and applied research which are identified by an institution of higher education, through formal or informal consultation with local nonprofit, governmental, and community-based organizations, and which—

(1) are designed to improve the quality of life for community residents, particularly low-income individuals, or to solve particular problems related to the needs of such residents, including but not limited to, such fields as health care, child care, education, literacy training, welfare, social services, public safety, crime prevention and control, transportation, recreation, housing and neighborhood improvement, rural development, and community improvement; and

(2) provide participating students with work-learning opportunities related to their educational or vocational programs or goals.

(Pub. L. 89–329, title IV, §415F, formerly §415E, as added Pub. L. 99–498, title IV, §401(a), Oct. 17, 1986, 100 Stat. 1336; amended Pub. L. 100–50, §5, June 3, 1987, 101 Stat. 340; renumbered §415F, Pub. L. 105–244, title IV, §407(c)(1), Oct. 7, 1998, 112 Stat. 1666.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Prior Provisions

A prior section 1070c–4, Pub. L. 89–329, title IV, §415E, as added Pub. L. 94–482, title I, §123(c)(3), Oct. 12, 1976, 90 Stat. 2094; amended Pub. L. 95–43, §1(a)(7), June 15, 1977, 91 Stat. 213, related to a program of bonus allotments, prior to repeal by Pub. L. 96–374, title IV, §404(d), Oct. 3, 1980, 94 Stat. 1407, eff. Oct. 1, 1980.

#### Amendments

1987—Par. (1). Pub. L. 100–50 substituted "literacy" for "literary".

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date of 1987 Amendment

Amendment by Pub. L. 100–50 effective as if enacted as part of the Higher Education Amendments of 1986, Pub. L. 99–498, see section 27 of Pub. L. 100–50, set out as a note under section 1001 of this title.
###### Editorial Note on Part 17

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 17 appear by T.D. ATF-436, 66 FR 5470, 5471, Jan. 19, 2001.

#### § 17.187 Discontinuance of business.

The manufacturer shall notify TTB when business is to be discontinued. Upon discontinuance of business, a manufacturer's entire stock of taxpaid distilled spirits on hand may be sold in a single sale without the necessity of qualifying as a wholesaler under part 1 of this chapter or registering and keeping records as a liquor dealer under part 31 of this chapter.The spirits likewise may be returned to the person from whom purchased, or they may be destroyed or given away.

[T.D. ATF-379, 61 FR 31412, June 20, 1996, as amended by T.D. TTB-25, 70 FR 19882, Apr. 15, 2005; T.D. TTB-79, 74 FR 37402, July 28, 2009]
###### Editorial Note on Part 26

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 26 appear by T.D. ATF-451, 66 FR 21668, 21669, May 1, 2001.

#### § 26.97 Marking containers of wine.

Containers of wine of Puerto Rican manufacture which are to be shipped to the United States must be marked with the name of the winemaker, the serial number of the container, the kind and taxable grade of the wine, the gallon content, and the serial number of the withdrawal permit, TTB Form 5170.7, prefixed by the number of such form, e.g., “ 5170.7-17-1.”

[20 FR 6077, Aug. 20, 1955, as amended by T.D. TTB-146, 82 FR 1132, Jan. 4, 2017]