alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY ELEV

 1,010.62

 1,010.29

 1,009.94

 1,009.65

 1,009.38

 1,009.02

 1,008.69

 1,008.39

 1,008.10

 1,007.78

 1,007.48

 1,007.17

 1,006.86

 1,006.54

 1,006.31

 1,006.01

 1,005.68

 1,005.36

 1,005.13

 1,004.85

 1,004.62

 1,004.32

 1,004.08

 1,003.79

 1,003.52

 1,003.29

 1,003.03

 1,002.79

 1,002.51

 1,002.37

 1,002.21

 1,570.7

 1,567.5

 1,564.2

 1,561.4

 1,558.9

 1,555.4

 1,552.3

 1,549.5

 1,546.7

 1,543.7

 1,540.9

 1,537.9

 1,535.0

 1,532.0

 1,529.8

 1,527.0

 1,523.9

 1,520.9

 1,518.7

 1,516.1

 1,514.0

 1,511.2

 1,508.9

 1,506.2

 1,503.7

 1,501.6

 1,499.2

 1,496.9

 1,494.3

 1,493.0

 1,491.6

STORAGE

-2.7

-3.2

-3.3

-2.8

-2.6

-3.4

-3.1

-2.8

-2.8

-3.0

-2.8

-2.9

-2.9

-3.0

-2.2

-2.8

-3.1

-3.0

-2.2

-2.6

-2.1

-2.8

-2.2

-2.7

-2.5

-2.1

-2.4

-2.2

-2.6

-1.3

-1.5

CHANGE

702

628

698

660

581

468

559

644

689

692

597

509

690

547

485

509

532

559

544

538

564

429

595

560

424

576

552

577

871

948

854

INFLOW

 1,912

 2,073

 2,244

 1,929

 1,738

 2,085

 2,039

 1,989

 1,978

 2,086

 1,888

 1,885

 2,054

 1,956

 1,458

 1,821

 1,986

 1,960

 1,540

 1,765

 1,541

 1,842

 1,617

 1,804

 1,598

 1,544

 1,652

 1,609

 2,054

 1,479

 1,485

POWER

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

SPILL

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

OUTLET

 139

 145

 139

 123

 139

 111

 98

 89

 98

 132

 138

 101

 110

 110

 119

 112

 106

 112

 91

 94

 106

 0

 109

 118

 93

 111

 120

 90

 126

 123

 117

C.F.S.

 .45

 .47

 .45

 .40

 .45

 .36

 .32

 .29

 .32

 .43

 .45

 .33

 .36

 .36

 .39

 .37

 .35

 .37

 .30

 .31

 .35

 .00

 .36

 .39

 .31

 .37

 .40

 .30

 .42

 .41

 .39

INCHES

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

PRECIP

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

AUGUST 2007 NEW MELONES LAKE DAILY OPERATIONS RUN DATE: October 17, 2007

IN LAKE

EVAPORATION

INCHES

C.F.S.

COMPUTED*

1000 ACRE-FEET

RELEASE - C.F.S.

TOTALS -81.6 18,781 56,611 0 0 3,419 11.23 .00

ACRE-FEET -81,600 37,252 112,288 0 0 6,782

COMMENTS:

SUMMARY

RELEASE (ACRE-FEET)

POWER 112,288

SPILL 0

OUTLET

TOTAL

 0

 112,288

PRECIPITATION

THIS MONTH =

TO DATE =

 .00

JULY 1, 2007 .00

 1,573.4

Table 13
No. 11,917.

#### Jones *v.*Panak.

Decided May 21, 1928.

Mr. J. F. Meador, for plaintiff in error.

Mr. E. Gr. Vanatta, for defendant in error.

*Department Two.*

Mr. Chief Justice Denison

delivered the opinion of the court.

*63Susan Panak, defendant in error, was defendant-below and had judgment there for $294.26, balance of her counterclaim over the claim of Jones, and he brings error.

The essential facts are these: one Pry built a house for Mrs. Panak for the agreed price of $7,300. Jones furnished the lumber. A balance of $2,772.25 remained unpaid, and Pry owed Jones $1,956.51 for lumber; Pry then assigned his claim to Jones who brought suit against Mrs. Panak for the whole balance due, $2,772.25, and at the same time brought a mechanic’s lien action for his $1,956.51. In the latter he had a judgment which was paid and was properly credited on the claim in the other action, this left a balance of $815.74 due Jones as assignee of Pry which was allowed by the court, but on counterclaim for defective work the court gave judgment for defendant for $1,110, ordered that the $815.74 be credited thereon and that execution issue for the balance $294.26.

It was irregular to give judgment for $1,110.00. It should have been for the balance of $294.26, if for anything, but since the practical result is the same the irregularity is not of consequence.

It was of course erroneous to give judgment against Jones for the balance of $294.26. ' It was not upon any liability of his; for Pry’s liabilities, however, existing at the time of the assignment, defendant was entitled to credit against Jones up to the amount of his claim. Code §§ 4 and 64.

Plaintiff in error claims that the evidence of defective work was insufficient to justify any allowance therefor, but ther'e is some evidence and we cannot disturb the finding.

The judgment is reversed with directions to enter the ordinary judgment for defendant, that she go without day.

Mr. Justice Campbell, Mr. Justice Butler and Me. Justice Adams concur.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

DAY HIGH

 160

 164

 157

 161

 166

 164

 164

 158

 154

 153

 151

 150

 143

 134

 131

 131

 129

 130

 134

 143

 145

 149

 142

 141

 139

 142

 137

 135

 131

 130

 149

 147

 147

 145

 146

 147

 148

 143

 140

 140

 139

 130

 129

 120

 117

 115

 116

 120

 124

 131

 134

 131

 131

 131

 132

 131

 125

 123

 120

 120

 152

 155

 152

 153

 153

 154

 155

 149

 145

 145

 145

 139

 134

 125

 122

 121

 121

 124

 129

 137

 138

 139

 137

 136

 134

 137

 131

 128

 125

 125

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

JUNE 2002 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: July 8, 2002

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

GREENS LANDING ON THE SACRAMENTO RIVER
TREATIES AND OTHER INTERNATIONAL ACTS SERIES 10-930 

________________________________________________________________________ 

CULTURAL PROPERTY 

 Agreement Between the 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA 

and BOSNIA AND HERZEGOVINA 

Signed at Sarajevo July 2, 2002 
 NOTE BY THE DEPARTMENT OF STATE 

 Pursuant to Public Law 89—497, approved July 8, 1966 

(80 Stat. 271; 1 U.S.C. 113)—

“. . .the Treaties and Other International Acts Series issued 

under the authority of the Secretary of State shall be competent 

 evidence . . . of the treaties, international agreements other than 

treaties, and proclamations by the President of such treaties and 

international agreements other than treaties, as the case may be, 

therein contained, in all the courts of law and equity and of maritime 

jurisdiction, and in all the tribunals and public offices of the 

United States, and of the several States, without any further proof 

or authentication thereof.” 
BOSNIA AND HERZEGOVINA 

Cultural Property 

Agreement signed at Sarajevo July 2, 2002; 

 Entered into force September 30, 2010.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY ELEV

 1,901.08

 1,900.88

 1,900.98

 1,901.14

 1,901.02

 1,900.99

 1,901.26

 1,901.53

 1,901.44

 1,901.74

 1,901.80

 1,901.56

 1,901.50

 1,901.36

 1,901.70

 1,901.41

 1,901.52

 1,901.47

 1,901.28

 1,901.22

 1,901.34

 1,901.40

 1,901.34

 1,901.29

 1,901.20

 1,901.09

 1,900.99

 1,900.87

 1,900.99

 1,900.90

 1,901.09

 13,971

 13,823

 13,896

 14,016

 13,926

 13,904

 14,105

 14,307

 14,240

 14,465

 14,509

 14,330

 14,285

 14,180

 14,435

 14,218

 14,300

 14,263

 14,120

 14,076

 14,165

 14,210

 14,165

 14,128

 14,061

 13,978

 13,904

 13,815

 13,904

 13,837

 13,978

STORAGE

+0

-148

+73

+120

-90

-22

+201

+202

-67

+225

+44

-179

-45

-105

+255

-217

+82

-37

-143

-44

+89

+45

-45

-37

-67

-83

-74

-89

+89

-67

+141

CHANGE

315

238

419

377

270

305

417

417

315

429

349

236

301

270

450

219

374

313

285

311

375

354

308

311

293

283

287

282

370

297

398

INFLOW

 0

 2

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 49

 80

 80

 80

 80

 80

 80

 80

 80

 80

 80

 80

 80

 80

 80

 93

 110

 110

 110

 110

 110

 110

 110

POWER

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 125

 179

 196

 196

 193

 192

 190

 196

 201

 200

 199

 199

 199

 200

 199

 182

 163

 162

 161

 164

 165

 165

 164

SPILL

 305

 301

 305

 305

 304

 305

 305

 305

 163

 46

 40

 40

 40

 40

 40

 40

 40

 40

 40

 40

 40

 40

 40

 43

 40

 40

 40

 40

 40

 40

 40

OUTLETS

 0

 0

 0

 2

 1

 1

 1

 0

 2

 1

 1

 0

 1

 1

 1

 2

 2

 2

 3

 4

 1

 1

 2

 2

 4

 3

 3

 3

 0

 6

 3

C.F.S.

 .02

 .01

 .06

 .11

 .06

 .04

 .05

 .02

 .07

 .04

 .03

 .01

 .06

 .03

 .06

 .09

 .10

 .11

 .14

 .17

 .04

 .05

 .08

 .08

 .16

 .14

 .16

 .14

 .00

 .27

 .13

INCHES

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

MARCH 2016 LEWISTON LAKE DAILY OPERATIONS RUN DATE: June 1, 2016

IN LAKE

EVAPORATION

C.F.S. FRANCIS CARR

COMPUTED*

ACRE-FEET

RELEASE - C.F.S. 

TOTALS +7 10,168 2,034 3,487 4,190 53 2.53

ACRE-FEET +7 20,168 4,034 6,916 8,311 105

* COMPUTED INFLOW IS THE SUM OF CHANGE IN STORAGE, RELEASES AND EVAPORATION.

(1) OUTLET RELEASE INCLUDES FISH RELEASE.

(2) INCHES OF EVAPORATION TAKEN FROM PAN AT TRINITY RIVER HATCHERY.

SUMMARY

RELEASE (ACRE-FEET)

TOTAL POWER 4,034

TOTAL RIVER 19,261 20,058

 13,971

 797

RIVER

JUDGE FRANCIS CARR POWERPLANT

TOTAL RELEASE

JUDGE (2)

(1) POWERPLANT

 10

 10

 77

 10

 10

 10

 10

 10

 10

 10

 10

 10

 10

 10

 10

 10

 10

 10

 35

 10

 10

 10

 10

 10

 10

 10

 10

 10

 10

 10

 10

 402

 797

Table 6
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

BRIGHT HARRY; RONALD STEPHEN 

DRAPER, 

Plaintiffs-Appellants, 

 v. 

KCG AMERICAS LLC; et al., 

Defendants-Appellees.

No. 21-16258 

D.C. No. 4:20-cv-07352-HSG 

MEMORANDUM*

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Northern District of California

Haywood S. Gilliam, Jr., District Judge, Presiding

Submitted March 16, 2022**

Before: SILVERMAN, MILLER, and BUMATAY, Circuit Judges.

Bright Harry and Ronald Stephen Draper appeal pro se from the district 

court’s judgment dismissing their action, declaring them vexatious litigants, and 

entering a pre-filing review order against them. We have jurisdiction under 28 

U.S.C. § 1291. We review de novo a dismissal under Federal Rule of Civil 

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent 

except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.

** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision 

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

FILED

MAR 24 2022

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
2 21-16258 

Procedure 12(b)(6). Hebbe v. Pliler, 627 F.3d 338, 341 (9th Cir. 2010). We 

affirm.

The district court properly dismissed Harry’s claims as barred by issue 

preclusion and Draper’s claims as barred by claim preclusion because the issues 

raised by Harry and Draper were adjudicated in a previous litigation against the 

same parties (or those in privity to the parties). See Janjua v. Neufeld, 933 F.3d 

1061, 1065 (9th Cir. 2019) (setting forth the elements of issue preclusion; holding 

that issue preclusion bars the relitigation of issues actually adjudicated in previous 

litigation); Owens v. Kaiser Found. Health Plan, Inc., 244 F.3d 708, 713 (9th Cir. 

2001) (setting forth elements of claim preclusion).

The district court did not abuse its discretion by declaring plaintiffs

vexatious litigants and entering a pre-filing review order against them because all 

of the requirements were met. See Ringgold-Lockhart v. County of Los Angeles, 

761 F.3d 1057, 1062 (9th Cir. 2014) (setting forth standard of review and 

requirements for pre-filing review orders).

The district court did not abuse its discretion by denying plaintiffs’ motion 

to recuse District Judge Gilliam because plaintiffs failed to demonstrate that a 

reasonable person would believe Judge Gilliam’s impartiality could be questioned. 

See United States v. Hernandez, 109 F.3d 1450, 1453 (9th Cir. 1997) (setting forth 

standard of review and discussing standard for recusal under 28 U.S.C. §§ 144 and 
3 21-16258 

455).

We reject as without merit plaintiffs’ contentions that Judge Gilliam and 

Judge Tigar behaved improperly.

We do not consider matters not specifically and distinctly raised and argued 

in the opening brief. See Padgett v. Wright, 587 F.3d 983, 985 n.2 (9th Cir. 2009). 

Plaintiffs’ motion to amend their excerpts of record (Docket Entry No. 34) is 

granted. All other pending requests are denied.

AFFIRMED.
EX-4.1



 EXHIBIT 4.1 

SPECIMEN COMMON STOCK CERTIFICATE 

[specimen common stock certificate] 

Incorporated under the Laws of the State of North Carolina 

Number of Shares of Common Stock:
                     of Live Oak Bancshares, Inc. no par value per share. 

This Common Stock of Live Oak Bancshares, Inc. is transferable only on the books of the Corporation by the holder hereof in person or by Attorney upon
surrender of this Certificate properly endorsed. 
 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the said Corporation has caused this Certificate to be signed by its duly authorized
officers and its Corporate Seal to be hereunto affixed this                  day of
                            , 2014. 

 

							
	President						Secretary


-  -  -  -  -  -  -  -  -  -  -  
-  -  -  -  -  -  -  -  -  -  -  -  -  -  -  -  -  -  -  
-  -  -  -  -  -  -  -  -  -  -  -  -  -  -  - 

Certificate Number:                      for
                     Shares of Common Stock 

For Value Received,                      hereby
sell, assign, and transfer unto                      Shares of the Common Stock represented by the within Certificate, said Common Stock on
the books of the within named Corporation with full power of substitution in the premises. 
 Dated:
                            , 2014.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
COMPANY'S CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET AS OF MARCH 31, 2000 AND
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS FOR THE FISCAL QUARTER ENDED
MARCH 31, 2000 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-29-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-2000
<CASH>                                          17,861
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  460,342
<ALLOWANCES>                                    17,673
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               524,442
<PP&E>                                         124,514
<DEPRECIATION>                                  57,035
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,300,488
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          326,021
<BONDS>                                        668,737
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                      6,665
<COMMON>                                           229
<OTHER-SE>                                     267,906
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 1,300,488
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               317,145
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  274,722
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              16,055
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  7,870
<INCOME-TAX>                                     3,030
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              4,840
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     4,840
<EPS-BASIC>                                       0.14
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.14


</TABLE>
###### Editorial Note on Part 478

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 478 appear by T.D. ATF-411, 64 FR 17291, Apr. 9, 1999, T.D. ATF-487, 68 FR 3750, Jan. 24, 2003, and ATF-11F, 73 FR 57240, Oct. 2, 2008.

#### § 478.143 Relief from disabilities incurred by indictment.

A licensed importer, licensed manufacturer, licensed dealer, or licensed collector who is indicted for a crime punishable by imprisonment for a term exceeding 1 year may, notwithstanding any other provision of the Act, continue operations pursuant to his existing license during the term of such indictment and until any conviction pursuant to the indictment becomes final: *Provided,* That if the term of the license expires during the period between the date of the indictment and the date the conviction thereunder becomes final, such importer, manufacturer, dealer, or collector must file a timely application for the renewal of his license in order to continue operations. Such application shall show that the applicant is under indictment for a crime punishable by imprisonment for a term exceeding 1 year.
###### Editorial Note on Part 478

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 478 appear by T.D. ATF-411, 64 FR 17291, Apr. 9, 1999, T.D. ATF-487, 68 FR 3750, Jan. 24, 2003, and ATF-11F, 73 FR 57240, Oct. 2, 2008.

#### § 478.53 Change in trade name.

A licensee continuing to conduct business at the location shown on his license is not required to obtain a new license by reason of a mere change in trade name under which he conducts his business: *Provided,* That such licensee furnishes his license for endorsement of such change to the Chief, Federal Firearms Licensing Center within 30 days from the date the licensee begins his business under the new trade name.

[33 FR 18555, Dec. 14, 1968. Redesignated at 40 FR 16835, Apr. 15, 1975, and amended by T.D. ATF-48, 44 FR 55842, Sept. 28, 1979; T.D. ATF-290, 54 FR 53055, Dec. 27, 1989]
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY ELEV

 584.73

 585.46

 584.85

 585.08

 584.10

 583.08

 582.75

 583.08

 583.65

 584.16

 583.90

 585.27

 584.82

 584.65

 584.89

 585.60

 585.04

 585.29

 584.85

 583.45

 584.26

 583.91

 584.62

 584.24

 584.03

 583.45

 583.29

 583.86

 583.90

 583.34

 583.49

 22,340

 22,796

 22,414

 22,557

 21,952

 21,332

 21,134

 21,332

 21,678

 21,989

 21,829

 22,677

 22,396

 22,291

 22,439

 22,884

 22,532

 22,689

 22,414

 21,556

 22,050

 21,835

 22,273

 22,038

 21,909

 21,556

 21,459

 21,805

 21,829

 21,489

 21,580

STORAGE

+160

+456

-382

+143

-605

-620

-198

+198

+346

+311

-160

+848

-281

-105

+148

+445

-352

+157

-275

-858

+494

-215

+438

-235

-129

-353

-97

+346

+24

-340

+91

CHANGE

6,332

6,478

6,062

6,327

5,945

5,930

6,140

6,322

6,326

6,329

6,076

6,518

6,027

6,088

6,189

6,342

5,961

6,194

5,980

5,673

6,256

5,846

6,168

5,834

5,894

5,727

5,831

6,055

5,907

5,709

5,930

INFLOW

 6,250

 6,244

 6,251

 6,252

 6,247

 6,239

 6,239

 6,219

 6,149

 6,169

 6,154

 6,088

 6,168

 6,140

 6,111

 6,111

 6,135

 6,112

 6,117

 6,104

 6,004

 5,950

 5,943

 5,950

 5,957

 5,904

 5,877

 5,879

 5,894

 5,878

 5,883

POWER

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

SPILL

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

FISHTRAP

 1

 4

 4

 3

 3

 4

 1

 3

 3

 3

 3

 2

 1

 1

 3

 7

 3

 3

 2

 2

 3

 4

 4

 2

 2

 1

 3

 2

 1

 2

 1

C.F.S.

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

OCTOBER 2013 KESWICK RESERVOIR DAILY OPERATIONS RUN DATE: November 8, 2013

RES.

EVAP

C.F.S.

COMPUTED*

ACRE-FEET

RELEASE - C.F.S. 

TOTALS -600 188,396 188,618 0 0 81

ACRE-FEET -600 373,683 374,124 0 0 161

SUMMARY

RELEASE (ACRE-FEET)

POWER 374,124

SPILL 0

 22,180

FISH TRAP 0

SPRING

CR. P. P.

RELEASE (1)

 638

 794

 798

 728

 722

 665

 641

 799

 380

 738

 721

 750

 768

 750

 660

 725

 692

 736

 939

 1,017

 1,030

 954

 946

 953

 1,320

 1,283

 1,280

 1,595

 1,726

 1,150

 1,304

 28,202

 55,939

*COMPUTED INFLOW IS SUM OF CHANGE IN STORAGE, RELEASES, AND EVAPORATION.

(1) EVAPORATION RECORDS TAKEN FROM SHASTA PAN.

SHASTA

RELEASE

C.F.S

 5,649

 5,514

 5,223

 5,533

 5,227

 5,255

 5,505

 5,572

 6,048

 5,630

 5,380

 5,869

 5,370

 5,483

 5,659

 5,747

 5,431

 5,611

 5,208

 4,947

 5,443

 5,172

 5,530

 5,207

 4,968

 4,879

 4,982

 4,855

 4,560

 4,961

 5,015

 165,433

 328,136
###### Editorial Note on Part 26

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 26 appear by T.D. ATF-451, 66 FR 21668, 21669, May 1, 2001.

#### § 26.276 Retention.

All records required by this part, documents or copies of documents supporting these records (including data filed with U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) pursuant to CBP requirements), and file copies of reports required by this part, must be retained for not less than three years from the date the shipment is released from customs custody into the United States, and during this period must be made available upon request of the appropriate TTB officer or a customs officer. Furthermore, the appropriate TTB officer may require these records to be kept for an additional period of not more than three years in any case where the appropriate TTB officer determines retention necessary or advisable. (For record retention periods under CBP regulations, see 19 CFR part 163.) Any records, or copies thereof, containing any of the information required by this part to be prepared, wherever kept, shall also be made available for inspection and copying.

(Approved by the Office of Management and Budget under control numbers 1513-0064 and 1513-0088)

[T.D. TTB-145, 81 FR 94202, Dec. 22, 2016]