alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 116th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 5292 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

116th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 5292

 To require the Secretary of Transportation to establish a policy with 
    respect to family seating on air transportation, and for other 
                               purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            December 3, 2019

  Mrs. Wagner (for herself and Mr. Brown of Maryland) introduced the 
 following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Transportation 
                           and Infrastructure

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To require the Secretary of Transportation to establish a policy with 
    respect to family seating on air transportation, and for other 
                               purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Fly Together Act''.

SEC. 2. POLICY ON FAMILIES FLYING WITH YOUNG CHILDREN.

    (a) In General.--Not later than 180 days after the date of 
enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Transportation shall establish 
a policy directing all air carriers providing scheduled passenger 
interstate or intrastate air transportation to establish policies that 
enable a child, who is age 13 or under on the date an applicable flight 
is scheduled to occur, to be seated in a seat adjacent to the seat of 
an accompanying family member over the age of 13, to the maximum extent 
practicable and at no additional cost, except when assignment to an 
adjacent seat would--
            (1) require an upgrade to--
                    (A) another cabin class;
                    (B) a seat with extra legroom; or
                    (C) seat pitch for which additional payment is 
                normally required; or
            (2) violate safety guidelines.
    (b) Statutory Construction.--Notwithstanding the requirement in 
subsection (a), nothing in this section may be construed to allow the 
Secretary to impose a significant change in the overall seating or 
boarding policy of an air carrier providing scheduled passenger 
interstate or intrastate air transportation that has an open or 
flexible seating policy in place that generally allows adjacent family 
seating as described in subsection (a).
    (c) Definition of Air Carrier.--In this section, the term ``air 
carrier'' has the meaning given the term in section 40102(a) of title 
49, United States Code.
                                 <all>
```
Exhibit 23.5
 
 CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT PETROLEUM ENGINEERS AND GEOLOGISTS
   
 MILLER AND LENTS, LTD.
Texas Registered Engineering Firm No. F-144By

/s/
Carl D. RichardCarl D. Richard, P.E.Senior Vice President Two Houston Center · 909 Fannin Street, Suite 1300 · Houston, Texas 77010
Telephone 713-651-9455 · Telefax713-654-9914 · e-mail: mail@millerandlents.com
EXHIBIT 32



McDATA Corporation



Certification



Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

(Subsections (a) and (b) of
Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code)



Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code), each of the undersigned officers of McDATA Corporation, a Delaware corporation (the
Company), does hereby certify, to such officers knowledge, that:



The Companys Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended April 30, 2005 (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as
amended, and information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                    |  |  |  |                                                             
|------------------- |  |  |  | ------------------------------------------------------------
|                    |  | 
|Dated: June 6, 2005 |  |  |  | /s/ JOHN A. KELLEY, JR.                                     
|                    |  |  |  | John A. Kelley, Jr.                                         
|                    |  |  |  | Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer             
|                    |  | 
|Dated: June 6, 2005 |  |  |  | /s/ ERNEST J. SAMPIAS                                       
|                    |  |  |  | Ernest J. Sampias                                           
|                    |  |  |  | Senior Vice President of Finance and Chief Financial Officer
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

DAY ELEV

 121.65

 121.51

 121.15

 122.16

 122.83

 123.20

 123.22

 122.98

 122.36

 121.47

 121.32

 122.21

 123.00

 124.03

 123.88

 123.65

 123.26

 122.13

 122.19

 122.39

 122.73

 123.16

 122.22

 121.92

 122.15

 122.42

 122.72

 123.07

 7,194

 7,135

 6,984

 7,413

 7,715

 7,885

 7,894

 7,782

 7,503

 7,118

 7,055

 7,436

 7,791

 8,276

 8,205

 8,097

 7,913

 7,400

 7,427

 7,517

 7,670

 7,866

 7,440

 7,307

 7,409

 7,530

 7,665

 7,824

STORAGE

-46

-59

-151

+429

+302

+170

+9

-112

-279

-385

-63

+381

+355

+485

-71

-108

-184

-513

+27

+90

+153

+196

-426

-133

+102

+121

+135

+159

CHANGE

2,264

2,245

2,147

2,408

2,427

2,381

2,287

2,223

2,139

2,089

2,247

2,468

2,449

2,498

2,218

2,211

2,180

2,014

2,287

2,317

2,396

2,297

2,047

2,217

2,315

2,307

2,320

2,331

INFLOW

 2,206

 2,194

 2,143

 2,112

 2,194

 2,208

 2,194

 2,194

 2,194

 2,197

 2,193

 2,190

 2,191

 2,192

 2,193

 2,191

 2,192

 2,192

 2,193

 2,064

 2,231

 2,098

 2,158

 2,178

 2,186

 2,184

 2,190

 2,190

POWER

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 126

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

SPILL

 60

 60

 60

 60

 60

 60

 60

 60

 60

 60

 60

 60

 60

 60

 60

 60

 60

 60

 60

 60

 60

 60

 60

 60

 60

 60

 60

 60

HATCHERY

 1

 1

 0

 0

 1

 1

 1

 0

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 0

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 2

 2

 1

C.F.S.

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

FEBRUARY 2013 LAKE NATOMA DAILY OPERATIONS RUN DATE: March 1, 2013

IN LAKE

EVAP

C.F.S.

COMPUTED*

ACRE-FEET

RELEASE - C.F.S.

TOTALS +584 63,729 61,042 126 1,680 26

ACRE-FEET +584 126,406 121,077 250 3,332 52

COMMENTS:

* COMPUTED INFLOW IS THE SUM OF CHANGE IN STORAGE, RELEASES AND EVAPORATION.

SUMMARY

RELEASES (ACRE-FEET)

POWER 121,077

SPILL 250

FOLSOM SOUTH CANAL

HATCHERY

 1,113

 3,332

 7,240

FOLSOM

SOUTH 

CANAL

 20

 20

 20

 20

 20

 26

 27

 25

 25

 25

 25

 25

 18

 0

 0

 13

 20

 20

 20

 21

 27

 39

 43

 45

 17

 0

 0

 0

 561

 1,113

(1)

(1) INCHES OF EVAPORATION TAKEN FROM FOLSOM PAN.

RELEASES (ACRE-FEET)

TOTAL 125,772
§ 6.21 Application. Except as provided in subpart D, it is unlawful for any industry member to induce, directly or indirectly, any retailer to purchase any products from the industry member to the exclusion, in whole or in part, of such products sold or offered for sale by other persons in interstate or foreign commerce by any of the following means: ( a ) By acquiring or holding (after the expiration of any license held at the time the FAA Act was enacted) any interest in any license with respect to the premises of the retailer;
( b ) By acquiring any interest in the real or personal property owned, occupied, or used by the retailer in the conduct of his business;
( c ) By furnishing, giving, renting, lending, or selling to the retailer, any equipment, fixtures, signs, supplies, money, services or other thing of value, subject to the exceptions contained in subpart D;
( d ) By paying or crediting the retailer for any advertising, display, or distribution service;
( e ) By guaranteeing any loan or the repayment of any financial obligation of the retailer;
( f ) By extending to the retailer credit for a period in excess of the credit period usual and customary to the industry for the particular class of transactions as prescribed in § 6.65; or
( g ) By requiring the retailer to take and dispose of a certain quota of any such products.
### subpart 1—program for secondary school students and teachers
CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO


18
      U.S.C. SECTION 1350


AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002







In
      connection with the Report of Caribbean American Health Resorts
      Inc, a Minnesota corporation (the “Company”), on Form 10-QSB for the
      quarter ended March 31, 2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange
      Commission on the date hereof (the ”Report”),I, Halton Martin, certify pursuant
      to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
      Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge and
      belief:





1.   The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
      of
      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





2.   The
      information contained in this Report fairly presents, in all
      material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operations of operations of the
      Company.








Dated:
      November 28, 2007








Caribbean
      American Health Resorts, Inc.




By:/s/
      Halton
      Martin


Halton
      Martin


Chief
      Executive Officer and


Chief
      Financial Officer
#### James L. Rolfe, Appellant, v. Lester M. Spaide et al., Respondents.

Judgment and orders affirmed, with costs. All concur. (The judgment is for defendants for no cause of action in an automobile negligence action. One order denies plaintiff’s motion for a new trial on the minutes, and the other order denies plaintiff’s motion for a new trial on the ground of newly discovered evidence.) Present — Taylor, P. J., McCurn, Love, Vaughan and Kimball, JJ. [See *post,*p. 1056.]
#### The People of the State of New York v. The Metropolitan Surety Company. In the Matter of the Petition of the United States of America for the Use of the Crane Company v. John F. Yawger, as Receiver of the Metropolitan Surety Company.

Motion granted by default.
Note: Shaded area not verified with CDFW data

Delta Smelt Splittail Longfin Pumping

Daily Total Daily Total

Daily Combined Daily Combined Daily In CFS In Acre Feet

Total Daily 14-Day Total Daily 14-Day Total

SWP Larval 

Yor N CVP Larval Yor N Total Average SWP CVP Total Average SWP Larval Yor N CVP Larval Yor N

1-Nov-18 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2,293 3,456 5,748 4,548 6,854 11,402 0.0 0.0

2-Nov-18 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2,125 3,456 5,581 4,215 6,855 11,070 0.0 0.0

3-Nov-18 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2,746 3,451 6,197 5,446 6,845 12,291 0.0 0.0

4-Nov-18 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2,880 3,602 6,482 5,713 7,144 12,857 0.0 0.0

5-Nov-18 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2,558 3,460 6,018 5,074 6,863 11,937 0.0 0.0

6-Nov-18 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1,660 3,468 5,127 3,292 6,878 10,170 0.0 0.0

7-Nov-18 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1,649 3,469 5,118 3,270 6,881 10,151 0.0 0.0

8-Nov-18 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 601 3,472 4,073 1,193 6,886 8,079 0.0 0.0

9-Nov-18 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 500 3,469 3,969 992 6,880 7,872 0.0 0.0

10-Nov-18 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 709 2,593 3,302 1,406 5,143 6,549 0.0 0.0

11-Nov-18 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 843 2,592 3,436 1,673 5,142 6,815 0.0 0.0

12-Nov-18 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 837 2,587 3,424 1,661 5,131 6,792 0.0 0.0

13-Nov-18 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 622 2,583 3,205 1,233 5,124 6,357 0.0 0.0

14-Nov-18 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 515 1,991 2,506 1,021 3,949 4,970 0.0 0.0

15-Nov-18 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 730 1,778 2,508 1,448 3,527 4,975 0.0 0.0

16-Nov-18 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 837 1,778 2,616 1,661 3,527 5,188 0.0 0.0

17-Nov-18 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1,029 1,775 2,804 2,041 3,520 5,561 0.0 0.0

18-Nov-18 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 974 1,619 2,592 1,931 3,211 5,142 0.0 0.0

19-Nov-18 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 992 1,802 2,795 1,968 3,575 5,543 0.0 0.0

20-Nov-18 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1,856 1,806 3,662 3,681 3,582 7,263 0.0 0.0

21-Nov-18 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1,666 1,814 3,481 3,305 3,599 6,904 0.0 0.0

22-Nov-18 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2,484 1,809 4,293 4,927 3,589 8,516 0.0 0.0

23-Nov-18 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1,851 1,814 3,665 3,672 3,598 7,270 0.0 0.0

24-Nov-18 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2,081 1,814 3,895 4,127 3,598 7,725 0.0 0.0

25-Nov-18 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2,072 1,811 3,883 4,110 3,592 7,702 0.0 0.0

26-Nov-18 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 612 1,810 2,421 1,213 3,590 4,803 0.0 0.0

27-Nov-18 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1,812 1,812 0 3,594 3,594 0.0 0.0

28-Nov-18 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1,824 1,824 0 3,617 3,617 0.0 0.0

29-Nov-18 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3,459 3,459 0 6,860 6,860 0.0 0.0

30-Nov-18 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1,861 3,472 5,333 3,691 6,887 10,578 0.0 0.0

Total 0 0 0 XXXX 0 0 0 XXXX 0 0 39,583 75,645 115,227 78,512 150,041 228,553 XXXX XXXX

Official data is posted on CDFW's webpage.

Banks SWP CVP

CENTRAL VALLEY OPERATIONS OFFICE

DELTA SMELT, SPLITTAIL and LONGFIN REPORT

NOVEMBER 2018

DATE

Delta Smelt Daily 

Density

Banks Tracy Combined Tracy Combined
###### Editorial Note on Part 40

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 40 appear by T.D. ATF-460, 66 FR 39094-39096, July 27, 2001; T.D. ATF-464, 66 FR 43479, Aug. 20, 2001; and T.D. TTB-91, 76 FR 5479, Feb. 1, 2011.

#### § 40.497 Additional information.

The appropriate TTB officer may require such additional information as deemed necessary to determine whether the applicant is entitled to a permit under this subpart. The applicant shall, when required by the appropriate TTB officer, furnish as a part of the application for the permit such additional information as may be necessary for the appropriate TTB officer to determine whether the applicant is entitled to a permit.
EXHIBIT 31.1

Rule 13a-14 Certification 

I, Michael J. Metzger, President of Capital Builders, Inc., certify that:

- I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of Capital Builders Development Properties II (the "Registrant").;

2. Based on my knowledge, this annual report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this annual report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this annual report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. The registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, is made known to us by others within the registrant, particularly during the period in which this annual report is being prepared;

b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent fiscal year that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting; and

5. The registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

- All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal controls over financial reporting which were reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial data; and 
- Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting. 

 

March 28, 2005

 

__________________________________________

Michael J. Metzger

President
#### The People of the State of New York ex rel. Spencer J. Stewart, Appellant, v. John N. Carlisle, as Commissioner of Highways of the State of New York, Respondent.

Order unanimously affirmed, with costs.
#### Julia M. A. Mandery, Appellant, v. Joseph J. Mandery, Respondent.

Judgment affirmed, with costs. All concurred.
Editorial Note on Part 18
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 18 appear by T.D. ATF-436, 66 FR 5471, 5472, Jan. 19, 2001.

§ 18.22 Restrictions as to location and use. ( a ) *Restrictions.* A concentrate plant may not be established in any dwelling house or on board any vessel or boat, or on any premises where any other business is conducted. The premises of a concentrate plant may be used only for the business stated in the approved application for registration.
( b ) *Exceptions.* The appropriate TTB officer may authorize ( 1 ) the establishment of a concentrate plant on premise where other business is conducted, or
( 2 ) the use of the premises of a concentrate plant for other business. A person or proprietor desiring such authorization shall submit a written application to the appropriate TTB officer. The application will describe the other business by type and the premises to be used. If the premises of a concentrate plant are to be used for other business, the relationship (if any) to the concentrate plant will be described in the application. A concentrate plant may not be established on premises where other business is conducted or used to conduct other business until the application is approved. The appropriate TTB officer may decline to approve the application or withdraw the authorization if the revenue is jeopardized or the effective administration of this part is hindered.
(Approved by the Office of Management and Budget under control number 1512-0046) [T.D. ATF-104, 47 FR 23921, June 2, 1982, as amended by T.D. ATF-381, 61 FR 37003, July 16, 1996]
EX-4.3



 Exhibit 4.3 

AMENDMENT NO. 2 
 TO THE

 BOB EVANS FARMS, INC. AND AFFILIATES 

401K RETIREMENT PLAN 

(amended and restated effective January 1, 2011) 

WHEREAS, Bob Evans Farms, Inc. (the “Sponsor”) has adopted the Bob Evans Farms, Inc. and Affiliates 401K Retirement Plan (the
“Plan”); and 
 WHEREAS, the Plan provides that the Sponsor may amend the Plan from time to time; and 

WHEREAS, the Sponsor desires to amend the Plan in order to receive a determination letter from the IRS; 

NOW, THEREFORE, the Plan is amended as follows: 

1. Effective on and after January 1, 2002, the last sentences of Section 2.01(a) and Section 2.02(b) shall be deleted in their
entirety and the following paragraph shall be added to Section 2.01(b) at the end thereof. 
 Allocations of Employer
Contributions shall be made separately for each eligible Employee. Employer Contributions allocated for a Plan Year pursuant to this Section 2.01 shall comply with the nondiscrimination requirements set forth in Treasury Regulation 1.401(a)(4)-2(c) if an equivalent accrual rate were substituted for a Participant’s allocation rate in the determination of the rate groups. In addition, the contributions allocated to Participants for
the Plan Year are required to satisfy the broadly available allocation rates set forth in Treasury Regulation 1.401(a)(4)-8(b)(1)(iii) or the minimum allocation gateway requirement set forth in Treasury Regulation
1.401(a)(4)-8(b)(1)(vi). The minimum allocation gateway requirement shall require each eligible Non-Highly-Compensated Employee to have an allocation rate that is not less than the lesser of 5% or one-third of
the allocation rate of the Highly-Compensated Employee with the highest allocation rate. To the extent that the requirements set forth in this paragraph have not been met for a Plan Year, the allocations made by the Plan to the Plan’s
Highly-Compensated Employees shall be reduced on a pro-rata basis until such requirements have been met. For the purpose of determining the equivalent accrual rate in this subsection (b), “Compensation” shall have the meaning of
“Section 415 Limit Compensation” as defined in Section 3.01(a). 







 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Sponsor, by a duly authorized officer, has caused this Amendment No. 2 to be executed
effective as set forth above. 
  

									
							BOB EVANS FARMS, INC.
					
	Date:		  
				By:		  

					
							Title:		  



  
 - 2 -
#### Bernard Gerla, Appellant, v. Bankers Trust Company, Individually and as Substituted Trustee under the Will of Albert S. Rosenbaum, Deceased, Respondent.

Plaintiff, a real estate broker, sued to recover a brokerage commission for the alleged negotiation of a lease. Judgment, dismissing the amended complaint on the merits at the close of plaintiff’s case, unanimously affirmed, with costs. No opinion. Present — Hagarty, Acting P. J., Carswell, Johnson, Adel and Sneed, JJ. [See *post,*p. 785.]
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 09-7030

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

v.

BERNARD DONNELL SHERILL, a/k/a Nard,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western 

District of North Carolina, at Charlotte. Frank D. Whitney, 

District Judge. (3:95-cr-00005-FDW-8)

Submitted: March 31, 2011 Decided: April 4, 2011

Before NIEMEYER, SHEDD, and AGEE, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Noell Peter Tin, TIN, FULTON, WALKER & OWEN, PLLC, Charlotte, 

North Carolina, for Appellant. Amy Elizabeth Ray, Assistant 

United States Attorney, Asheville, North Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Bernard Donnell Sherill appeals the district court’s 

order granting his 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c) (2006) motion. We have 

reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, 

we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United 

States v. Sherill, No. 3:95-cr-00005-FDW-8 (W.D.N.C. May 22, 

2009). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and 

legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials 

before the court and argument would not aid the decisional 

process. 

AFFIRMED