alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 70 (Tuesday, April 12, 2011)]
[Notices]
[Pages 20358-20359]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2011-8609]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health & Human 
Development; Notice of Closed Meeting

    Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended (5 U.S.C. App.), notice is hereby given of the following 
meeting.
    The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the 
provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 
U.S.C., as amended. The concept review and evaluation discussions could 
disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as 
patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals 
associated with the contract proposals, the disclosure of which would 
constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

    Name of Committee: National Institute of Child Health and Human 
Development Special Emphasis Panel; Folic Acid/Zinc Sulfate 
Supplementation, Semen Quality, and Ovulation Induction/IVF 
Outcomes.
    Date: April 12, 2011.
    Time: 2 p.m. to 3 p.m.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate concept review.

[[Page 20359]]

    Place: National Institutes of Health, 6100 Executive Boulevard, 
Rockville, MD 20852, (Telephone Conference Call).
    Contact Person: Sathasiva B. Kandasamy, PhD, Scientific Review 
Officer, Division of Scientific Review, Eunice Kennedy Shriver 
National Institute of Child Health and Human Development, NIH, 6100 
Executive Blvd., Room 5B01, Bethesda, MD 20892, 301-435-6680, 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#e29189838c86839183a28f838b8ecc8c8b8acc858d94"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="bfccd4ded1dbdeccdeffd2ded6d391d1d6d791d8d0c9">[email protected]</span></a>.
    This notice is being published less than 15 days prior to the 
meeting due to the timing limitations imposed by the review and 
funding cycle.

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.864, 
Population Research; 93.865, Research for Mothers and Children; 
93.929, Center for Medical Rehabilitation Research; 93.209, 
Contraception and Infertility Loan Repayment Program, National 
Institutes of Health, HHS)

    Dated: April 5, 2011.
Jennifer S. Spaeth,
Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. 2011-8609 Filed 4-11-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
### Part C—Secondary School Programs for Basic Skills Improvement and Dropout Prevention and Reentry
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OF HALIS, INC. FOR THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1997 
AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL 
STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1997
<CASH>                                       1,160,809
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                1,104,600
<ALLOWANCES>                                   407,265
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             2,272,421
<PP&E>                                       1,476,574
<DEPRECIATION>                                 695,385
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               6,925,006
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        4,063,213
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       442,397
<OTHER-SE>                                   2,274,828
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 6,925,006
<SALES>                                     10,134,586
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            10,134,586
<CGS>                                        1,889,858
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               24,982,908
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               165,313
<LOSS-PROVISION>                             5,395,053
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              93,736
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (20,502,424)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (20,502,424)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     (.57)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     (.57)
        

</TABLE>
#### William Groben, Respondent, v. John J. Edel, Appellant.

In an action to recover damages for assault, the court awarded plaintiff $6,500, and defendant appeals. Judgment unanimously affirmed, with costs. The proof justified a finding that defendant was guilty of a brutal, wanton and unprovoked assault. He offered no proof to controvert plaintiff’s evidence that as a result of such assault plaintiff suffered serious injuries, including a fracture of the skull, and it may not be held that the verdict is excessive. Loss of earnings may be shown under the general allegation of damage and need not be specifically alleged because it is a necessary and direct result of an injury and constitutes a damage which the law implies. *(Keiffert*v. *Nassau Electric R. R. Co.,*51 App. Div, 301; *Cabot*v. *McKane,*41 Hun 642, opinion in 1 N. Y. St. Rep. 495; *Hubert*v. *Bedell,*66 Hun 631, opinion in 21 N. Y. S. 305; *Mellwitz*v. *Manhattan Ry. Co.,*62 Hun 622, opinion in 17 N. Y. S. 112; 15,Am. Jur., Damages, § 315; 17 C. J., Damages, § 312; 2 Clark, New York Law of Damages, § 773.) Present — Lewis, P. J., Carswell, Johnston, Adel and Sneed, JJ.
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Roberto MUNOZ-PEREZ, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 05-51313

Conference Calendar.

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.

July 13, 2006.

Joseph H. Gay, Jr, Assistant U.S. Attorney, U.S. Attorney’s Office, Western District of Texas, San Antonio, TX, for Plaintiff-Appellee.

Federal Public Defender’s Office, Western District of Texas, San Antonio, TX, for Defendant-Appellant.

Before DAVIS, BARKSDALE, and DeMOSS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: *

Appealing the Judgment in a Criminal Case, Roberto Munoz-Perez raises arguments that are foreclosed by *AlmendarezTorres v. United States,*523 U.S. 224, 235, 118 S.Ct. 1219, 140 L.Ed.2d 350 (1998), which held that 8 U.S.C. § 1326(b)(2) is a penalty provision and not a separate criminal offense. The Government’s motion for summary affirmance is GRANTED, and the judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.

*

 Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Postal Service

# AGENCY:

                        Postal Service TM                        .                    

# ACTION:

Notice.

# SUMMARY:

The Postal Service gives notice of a market test of an experimental product in accordance with statutory requirements.

# DATES:

January 18, 2011.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

David H. Rubin, 202-268-2986.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    The United States Postal Service® hereby gives notice pursuant to 39 U.S.C. 3641(c)(1) that it will begin a market test of its “Gift Cards” experimental product on or around May 1, 2011. The Postal Service has filed with the Postal Regulatory Commission a notice setting out the basis for the Postal Service's determination that the market test is covered by 39 U.S.C. 3641 and describing the nature and scope of the market test. Documents are available at                     *http://www.prc.gov,*                     Docket No. MT2011-2.                

Neva R. Watson,

Attorney, Legislative.

[FR Doc. 2011-857 Filed 1-14-11; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 7710-12-P
March 2023

 STORAGE1000 ACRE-FEET COMPUTED* RELEASE - C.F.S. EVAPORATION PRECIP

DAY ELEV IN LAKE CHANGE INFLOW

C.F.S. POWER SPILL OUTLET C. F. S. INCHES INCHES

1,097.5

1 956.31 1,103.3 5.7 3,005 103 0 0 7 0.03 0.85

2 956.91 1,107.9 4.6 2,378 31 0 0 25 0.10 0.03

3 957.45 1,112.0 4.2 2,275 147 0 0 30 0.12 0.00

4 958.00 1,116.3 4.2 2,309 161 0 0 10 0.04 0.00

5 958.54 1,120.5 4.2 2,669 546 0 0 15 0.06 0.55

6 959.07 1,124.6 4.1 2,524 446 0 0 8 0.03 0.46

7 960.05 1,132.2 7.6 4,130 263 0 0 23 0.09 0.06

8 960.59 1,136.4 4.2 2,195 48 0 0 20 0.08 0.01

9 961.42 1,142.9 6.5 3,557 268 0 0 13 0.05 0.19

10 964.42 1,166.6 23.7 12,136 152 0 0 44 0.17 2.21

11 967.01 1,187.3 20.7 10,532 98 0 0 3 0.01 0.49

12 969.75 1,209.4 22.1 11,220 32 0 0 24 0.09 1.98

13 971.79 1,226.1 16.7 8,426 30 0 0 0 0.00 1.68

14 974.39 1,247.5 21.4 11,193 369 0 0 19 0.07 0.69

15 977.21 1,271.0 23.5 13,245 1,389 0 0 5 0.02 0.44

16 978.91 1,285.3 14.3 8,626 1,396 0 0 19 0.07 0.00

17 979.99 1,294.5 9.1 6,673 2,032 0 0 33 0.12 0.00

18 980.95 1,302.6 8.2 5,899 1,742 0 0 44 0.16 0.00

19 981.99 1,311.5 8.9 5,832 1,336 0 0 22 0.08 0.20

20 982.96 1,319.8 8.3 6,282 2,092 0 0 0 0.00 0.36

21 984.05 1,329.2 9.4 5,776 1,019 0 0 28 0.10 0.07

22 984.96 1,337.0 7.9 5,397 1,403 0 0 31 0.11 0.46

23 985.77 1,344.1 7.0 5,364 1,806 0 0 17 0.06 0.42

24 986.44 1,349.9 5.8 4,610 1,658 0 0 14 0.05 0.17

25 987.00 1,354.8 4.9 4,245 1,744 0 0 42 0.15 0.01

26 987.54 1,359.5 4.7 3,956 1,536 0 0 40 0.14 0.00

27 988.07 1,364.1 4.6 3,864 1,489 0 0 37 0.13 0.00

28 988.78 1,370.4 6.2 4,349 1,164 0 0 43 0.15 0.00

29 989.66 1,378.1 7.7 4,410 495 0 0 9 0.03 0.76

30 990.56 1,386.1 8.0 4,091 62 0 0 20 0.07 0.61

31 991.39 1,393.4 7.4 3,747 23 0 0 14 0.05 0.03

TOTALS 295.8 174,915 25,080 0 0 659 2.43 12.73

ACRE-FEET 295,800 346,944 49,746 0 0 1,307

Comments: * COMPUTED INFLOW IS THE SUM OF CHANGE IN STORAGE, RELEASES, PUMPING AND EVAPORATION

 SUMMARY

Release (ACRE-FEET)

Power 49,746 Outlet 0

Spill 0 Total Releases 49,746

Precipitation

This month = 12.73

October 01, 2022 To date = 46.17

Historical Archive and Report Database

New Melones Lake Daily Operations

Run Date: 4/7/2023
###### Editorial Note on Part 4

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 4 appear by T.D. ATF-425, 65 FR 11890, Mar. 7, 2000.

#### § 4.72 Metric standards of fill.

(a) *Authorized standards of fill.* The standards of fill for wine are the following:

| 3 liters. | 355 milliliters |
| --- | --- |
| 1.5 liters. | 250 milliliters. |
| 1 liter. | 200 milliliters. |
| 750 milliliters. | 187 milliliters. |
| 500 milliliters. | 100 milliliters. |
| 375 milliliters. | 50 milliliters. |

(b) *Sizes larger than 3 liters.* Wine may be bottled or packed in containers of 4 liters or larger if the containers are filled and labeled in quantities of even liters (4 liters, 5 liters, 6 liters, etc.).

(c) *Tolerances.* The tolerances in fill are the same as are allowed by § 4.37 in respect to statement of net contents on labels.

[T.D. ATF-12, 39 FR 45223, Dec. 31, 1974, as amended by T.D. ATF-49, 43 FR 19848, May 9, 1978; T.D. ATF-76, 46 FR 1727, Jan. 7, 1981; T.D. ATF-303, 55 FR 42713, Oct. 23, 1990. Redesignated by T.D. ATF-953, 68 FR 39455, July 2, 2003; T.D. TTB-165, 85 FR 85520, Dec. 29, 2020]
###### Editorial Note on Part 28

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 28 appear by T.D. ATF-477, 67 FR 18087 through 18090, Apr. 15, 2002.

#### § 28.110 Losses.

Where there has been a loss of distilled spirits while in transit from the bonded premises of a distilled spirits plant to a port of export, a customs bonded warehouse, a manufacturing bonded warehouse, a vessel or aircraft, or a foreign-trade zone, the provisions of subpart O of this part, with respect to losses of spirits after withdrawal without payment of tax and to claims for remission of the tax thereon, shall be applicable.

(72 Stat. 1323, as amended, 84 Stat. 1965; 26 U.S.C. 5008, 5066)

[T.D. 7112, 36 FR 8581, May 8, 1971. Redesignated at 40 FR 16835, Apr. 15, 1975]
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 97-1329

REGINALD SAVAGE,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

and

NANCY PAIGE SMITH,

Plaintiff,

versus

BOARD OF TRUSTEES, St. Mary's College of

Maryland; MICHAEL BERGER, Division of Head of

Human Development, St. Mary's College of Maryland; MELVIN ENDY, Provost; EDWARD LEWIS,

President; ALLAN PASKOW,

Defendants - Appellees,

JOHN UNDERWOOD; KENNETH HOLMES,

Movants.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of

Maryland, at Greenbelt. Deborah K. Chasanow, District Judge. (CA92-3646-DKC)

Submitted: March 26, 1998 Decided: April 6, 1998
2

Before WIDENER and MOTZ, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior

Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Reginald Savage, Appellant Pro Se. Susan Ann Griisser, OFFICE

OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF MARYLAND, Baltimore, Maryland, for

Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).

PER CURIAM:

Appellant appeals the district court's order entering judgment

for his employer on his claims of retaliatory and constructive

discharge. We have reviewed the record and the district court's

opinions and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on

the reasoning of the district court. Savage v. Board of Trustees,

No. CA-92-3646-DKC (D. Md. Jan. 27, 1997). We dispense with oral

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately

presented in the materials before the court and argument would not

aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY ELEV

 1,009.02

 1,009.03

 1,008.93

 1,008.87

 1,008.71

 1,008.65

 1,008.50

 1,008.32

 1,008.13

 1,008.00

 1,007.83

 1,007.81

 1,007.74

 1,007.65

 1,007.63

 1,007.49

 1,007.46

 1,007.43

 1,007.59

 1,007.78

 1,007.79

 1,007.72

 1,007.71

 1,007.69

 1,007.65

 1,007.64

 1,007.66

 1,007.65

 1,007.52

 1,007.49

 1,007.27

 1,555.4

 1,555.5

 1,554.6

 1,554.0

 1,552.5

 1,551.9

 1,550.5

 1,548.8

 1,547.0

 1,545.8

 1,544.2

 1,544.0

 1,543.3

 1,542.5

 1,542.3

 1,540.9

 1,540.7

 1,540.4

 1,541.9

 1,543.7

 1,543.8

 1,543.1

 1,543.0

 1,542.8

 1,542.5

 1,542.4

 1,542.6

 1,542.5

 1,541.2

 1,540.9

 1,538.9

STORAGE

+0.2

+0.1

-1.0

-0.6

-1.5

-0.6

-1.4

-1.7

-1.8

-1.2

-1.6

-0.2

-0.7

-0.9

-0.2

-1.3

-0.3

-0.3

+1.5

+1.8

+0.1

-0.7

-0.1

-0.2

-0.4

-0.1

+0.2

-0.1

-1.2

-0.3

-2.1

CHANGE

489

487

519

614

384

568

575

458

698

815

581

666

599

631

973

550

660

805

1,045

1,066

823

813

651

504

492

550

685

756

670

803

673

INFLOW

 344

 378

 955

 864

 1,109

 803

 1,264

 1,285

 1,572

 1,416

 1,379

 730

 902

 1,029

 1,047

 1,202

 785

 927

 262

 155

 735

 1,104

 670

 535

 643

 558

 535

 748

 1,229

 867

 1,666

POWER

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

SPILL

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

OUTLET

 49

 61

 43

 37

 40

 52

 28

 34

 34

 21

 12

 31

 31

 31

 21

 15

 18

 21

 21

 6

 40

 43

 28

 64

 40

 40

 55

 55

 61

 79

 55

C.F.S.

 .16

 .20

 .14

 .12

 .13

 .17

 .09

 .11

 .11

 .07

 .04

 .10

 .10

 .10

 .07

 .05

 .06

 .07

 .07

 .02

 .13

 .14

 .09

 .21

 .13

 .13

 .18

 .18

 .20

 .26

 .18

INCHES

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .12

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .63

 .20

 .02

 .00

 .00

 .85

 .23

 .00

 .00

 .64

 .29

 .01

 .00

 .10

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

PRECIP

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

MARCH 2021 NEW MELONES LAKE DAILY OPERATIONS RUN DATE: April 5, 2021

IN LAKE

EVAPORATION

INCHES

C.F.S.

COMPUTED*

1000 ACRE-FEET

RELEASE - C.F.S.

TOTALS -16.6 20,603 27,698 0 0 1,166 3.81 3.09

ACRE-FEET -16,600 40,866 54,939 0 0 2,313

COMMENTS:

* COMPUTED INFLOW IS THE SUM OF CHANGE IN STORAGE, RELEASES AND EVAPORATION.

SUMMARY

RELEASE (ACRE-FEET)

POWER 54,939

SPILL 0

OUTLET

TOTAL

 0

 54,939

PRECIPITATION

THIS MONTH =

TO DATE =

 3.09

JULY 1, 2020 16.68

 1,555.3

Table 13 

OCT 1, 2020 TO DATE = 16.65
Exhibit 23.1
    
  17
#### Christopher C. Werner, as Trustee, etc., Respondent, v. Anna M. Doyle, Appellant.

Motion granted and appeal dismissed, with costs.
Exhibit 23.2

INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' CONSENT

We
consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration Statement Nos. 333-96207 and 333-41130 of Lone Star Technologies, Inc. on
Form S-3, and Registration Statement Nos. 33-64805, 333-38458, 333-46310 and 333-46312 on Form S-8, of our report
dated January 17, 2002 appearing in this Annual Report on Form 10-K of Lone Star Technologies, Inc. for the year ended December 31, 2002.

BDO-Hernández
Marrón y Cía., S.C.
March 24, 2003

---

QuickLinks
###### Editorial Note on Part 555

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 555 appear by T.D. ATF-487, 68 FR 3748, Jan. 24, 2003.

#### § 555.181 Reporting of plastic explosives.

All persons, other than an agency of the United States (including any military reserve component) or the National Guard of any State, possessing any plastic explosive on April 24, 1996, shall submit a report to the Director no later than August 22, 1996. The report shall be in writing and mailed by certified mail (return receipt requested) to the Director at P.O. Box 50204, Washington, DC 20091-0204. The report shall include the quantity of plastic explosives possessed on April 24, 1996; any marks of identification on such explosives; the name and address of the manufacturer or importer; the storage location of such explosives, including the city and State; and the name and address of the person possessing the plastic explosives.

[T.D. ATF-382, 61 FR 38085, July 23, 1996, as amended by T.D. ATF-387, 62 FR 8377, Feb. 25, 1997; ATF-11F, 73 FR 57242, Oct. 2, 2008]
#### § 5.221 Criminal penalties.

A violation of the labeling provisions of 27 U.S.C. 205(e) is punishable as a misdemeanor. See 27 U.S.C. 207 for the statutory provisions relating to criminal penalties, consent decrees, and injunctions.
This memorandum opinion was not selected for pub lication in the New Mexico Reports. Please 1 see Rule 12-405 NMRA for restrictions on the citation of unpublished memorandum opinions. 2 Please also note that this electronic memorandum opinion may contain computer-generated 3 errors or other deviations from the official paper version filed by the Court of Appeals and does 4 not include the filing date. 5 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF NEW MEXICO 6 DANIEL W. COOK, 7 Defendant-Appellant, 8
v. NO. 29,523 9 WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A., 10 SUCCESSOR TO WELLS FARGO BANK 11 NEW MEXICO, N.A., 12 Plaintiff-Appellee. 13
APPEAL FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF BERNALILLO COUNTY 14 Ted Baca, District Judge 15 Daniel W. Cook 16 Albuquerque, NM 17 Pro Se Appellant 18 Sutin, Thayer & Browne, P.C. 19 Michelle K. Ostrye 20 Jay D. Hertz 21 Albuquerque, NM 22 for Appellee 23 MEMORANDUM OPINION 242 WECHSLER, Judge. 1 Appellant appeals an order granting summary judgment and an order denying 2 various motions filed by Appellant. We proposed to dismi ss the appeal in a calendar 3 notice. After the orders were entered below, Appellant filed motions to vacate the 4 summary judgment, to stay the judgment, to hold a new hearing, and to reconsider the 5 summary judgment order. We explained that the orders appealed from were not final 6 for purposes of appeal. In response, Appellant filed a Request for Return of Case to 7 District Court, and Appellee filed a response to Appellant ’s request. Appellee agrees 8 that the case should be dismissed and remanded to the district court. 9 Based on the discussion in our calendar notice, we holdthat the orders 10 appealed from are not final. We dismiss the appeal and remand the case to the district 11 court. 12 IT IS SO ORDERED. 13

______________________________ 14 JAMES J. WECHSLER, Judge 15 WE CONCUR: 16

_______________________________ 17 CELIA FOY CASTILLO, Judge 183 _______________________________ 1 MICHAEL E. VIGIL, Judge 2