alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
###### Editorial Note on Part 40

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 40 appear by T.D. ATF-460, 66 FR 39094-39096, July 27, 2001; T.D. ATF-464, 66 FR 43479, Aug. 20, 2001; and T.D. TTB-91, 76 FR 5479, Feb. 1, 2011.

#### § 40.166 Default, prepayment of tax required.

Where a check or money order tendered with any return, whether semi-monthly or prepayment, for payment of tax on tobacco products is not paid on presentment, where a manufacturer fails to remit with the return the full amount of tax due thereunder, or where a manufacturer is otherwise in default in payment of tax on tobacco products under the internal revenue laws or this chapter, during the period of such default and until the appropriate TTB officer finds that the revenue will not be jeopardized by the deferred payment of tax pursuant to the provisions of this part, no tobacco products shall be removed subject to tax until the tax thereon has first been paid as provided in § 40.167. Any remittance made during the period of a default shall be in cash, or in the form of a certified, cashier's, or treasurer's check drawn on any bank or trust company incorporated under the laws of the United States, or under the laws of any State, Territory, or possession of the United States, or in the form of a U.S. postal money order or other money order, and defined in § 70.61 of this chapter (payment by check or money order), or shall be delivered in the form of an electronic fund transfer message as provided in § 40.165a.

(68A Stat. 777, 72 Stat. 1417; 26 U.S.C. 6311, 5703; Aug. 16, 1954, ch. 736, 68A Stat. 707 (26 U.S.C. 5703); Aug. 16, 1954, ch. 736, 68A Stat. 777 (26 U.S.C. 6311))

[T.D. 6871, 31 FR 34, Jan. 4, 1966. Redesignated at 40 FR 16835, Apr. 15, 1975, and amended by T.D. ATF-48, 44 FR 55855, Sept. 28, 1979; T.D. ATF-77, 46 FR 3008, Jan. 13, 1981; T.D. ATF-232, 51 FR 28081, Aug. 5, 1986; T.D. ATF-243, 51 FR 43194, Dec. 1, 1986; T.D. ATF-301, 55 FR 47658, Nov. 14, 1990]
**GAO-12-200T**                      Published: Nov 02, 2011. Publicly Released: Nov 02, 2011.                  

-   
-   
-   
-   

    Jump To:  
-  Elder Abuse 
-  Services for Older Adults 
-  State and Local-Level Drivers and Trends 
-  State and Local Fiscal Projections 
-  Federal Borrowing 
-  Managing the Debt 
-  Summary of Funding Provisions 
-  Auditing the Government's Books 
-  Unpacking the Financial Report 
-  Highlights 
-  Recommendations 
-  Background 
-  About This Work 
-  About This Work 
-  Trends 
-  About the Center 
-  Why It's High Risk 
-  What Remains To Be Done 
-  Key Reports 
-  Newest COVID-Related Reports 
-  AI Use Cases 
-  Flood Insurance 
-  Past Pandemic-Related Reports 
-  CARES Act Oversight Reports 
-  All COVID-19 Reports 
-  Report Suspected Fraud 
-  Subjects 
-  How to Get Notified 
-  Past Reports 
-  Public Health Threats 
-  Explore the FY 2022 and 2023 Funds 
-  Lessons Learned 
-  Agency Reports 
-  Recent Reports 
-  Recommendations 
-  Supplemental Material 
-  Full Report 
-  Additional Data 
-  View Decision 
-  Downloads 
-  Previously Identified Actions 
-  Related Pages 
-  Associated Agencies 
-  Tough Choices and Opportunities Ahead 
-  Americas Fiscal Future Key Areas 
-  Retirement Security Key Areas 
-  Current List 
-  About The High Risk List 
-  Area Ratings 
-  Previous High Risk Products 
-  Search Federal Vacancies 
-  Past Federal Vacancies 
-  Violation Letters 
-  About the Yellow Book 
-  Advisory Council 
-  Related Resources 
-  Comment Letters 
-  Related Publications 
-  Contacts and Resources 
-  Major Issues Facing the Nation 
-  Meeting Strategic Challenges 
-  Additional Resources 
-  Resources 
-  GAO Contacts 
-  Mission Teams 
-  Operations and Staff Offices  
-  Organization Chart  
-  Why a Career at GAO? 
-  Am I Qualified? 
-  Company Culture 
-  Reasonable Accommodations 
-  Video Gallery 
-  Paid Internships 
-  Student Volunteers 
-  Professional Development Program 
-  Advancement 
-  Executive Candidate Program 
-  Summer Associates 
-  Externships 
-  Benefits 
-  Contacts 

Skip to Highlights

## Highlights

This testimony discusses our October 11 opinion concerning the Office of Science and Technology Policy's (OSTP) use of appropriations for bilateral activities with the government of the People's Republic of China.

## Full Report

Full Report (12 pages)

Accessible Text 

## Office of Public Affairs

Sarah Kaczmarek
kaczmareks@gao.gov

(202) 512-4800

## Topics

Auditing and Financial Management

Appropriated fundsAppropriation limitationsAppropriationsAuthorizationAuthorizing legislationExecutive agenciesInternational relationsLegal opinionsReporting requirementsUse of fundsForeign countries
**Exhibit 10.3**

 

**TRADEMARKLICENSE EXTENSION AGREEMENT**

 

This Extension Agreement dated as of August 1,2005 is by and between Hallmark Licensing, Inc. (“Hallmark Licensing”) andCrown Media United States, LLC (“Crown US”).

 

WHEREAS, Crown US and Hallmark Licensing havepreviously entered into that certain Amended and Restated Trademark LicenseAgreement between the parties dated as of March 17, 2001 as extended on November 30,2002, as of August 28, 2003 and as of August 1, 2004 (the “LicenseAgreement”); and

 

WHEREAS, the parties desire to further extendthe term of the License Agreement;

 

NOW, THEREFORE, Crown US and HallmarkLicensing hereby agree as follows:

 

The term of the License Agreement shall beextended for an additional period terminating on September 1, 2006,subject to any earlier termination pursuant to the terms of the LicenseAgreement.

 

All other terms and conditions of the LicenseAgreement will remain unchanged and in full force and effect.

 

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto haveexecuted this Extension Agreement as of the date set forth above.

 

 
| HALLMARK LICENSING, INC. |
|--------------------------|
|                     |
|                     |
| By:                      | Deanne R.  Stedem |   |
|                     |
| Title:                   |   | Vice  President |   |
|                          |  |  |  |  |

 

 
| CROWN MEDIA UNITED STATES, LLC |
|--------------------------------|
|                           |
|                           |
| By:                            | C. Stanford |   |
|                           |
| Title:                         |   | Vice  President |   |
|                                |  |  |  |  |

 

----
### Part B—Tariff Modifications
EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATIONS

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. § 1350

(ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002)

In connection with the annual report of IMPCO Technologies, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-K/A for the year ended December 31, 2005, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the
Report), I, Mariano Costamagna, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, hereby certify as of the date hereof, pursuant to Title 18, Chapter 63, Section 1350 of the United States Code, that:



|(1) | the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and
|--- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|(2) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company at the dates and for the periods
indicated.
|--- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                    |  |                                           
|------------------- |  | ------------------------------------------
|Date: June 26, 2006 |  | /s/ Mariano Costamagna                    
|                    |  | Mariano Costamagna Chief Executive Officer
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

DAY ELEV

 500.88

 500.97

 501.97

 502.61

 502.90

 503.06

 503.11

 503.21

 503.37

 503.60

 503.74

 503.88

 504.42

 505.03

 505.65

 506.30

 506.85

 507.25

 507.67

 508.08

 508.63

 509.11

 509.97

 511.44

 512.66

 513.67

 514.17

 514.76

 515.33

 218.2

 218.5

 221.5

 223.4

 224.3

 224.8

 224.9

 225.2

 225.7

 226.4

 226.8

 227.2

 228.9

 230.7

 232.7

 234.7

 236.4

 237.6

 238.9

 240.2

 241.9

 243.5

 246.2

 250.9

 254.8

 258.1

 259.8

 261.7

 263.6

STORAGE

+0.4

+0.3

+3.0

+1.9

+0.9

+0.5

+0.2

+0.3

+0.5

+0.7

+0.4

+0.4

+1.6

+1.9

+1.9

+2.0

+1.7

+1.2

+1.3

+1.3

+1.7

+1.5

+2.7

+4.7

+3.9

+3.3

+1.6

+1.9

+1.9

CHANGE

537

513

1,864

1,346

813

606

730

780

607

783

681

711

1,342

1,462

1,496

1,570

1,553

1,481

1,632

1,518

1,528

1,338

1,980

2,974

2,610

2,291

1,476

1,733

1,686

INFLOW

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

MADERA

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

SPILL

 253

 253

 255

 258

 260

 254

 542

 511

 251

 318

 352

 381

 403

 406

 404

 432

 570

 740

 861

 755

 532

 454

 458

 484

 510

 503

 530

 635

 613

FRIANT-KERN

 0

 20

 2

 14

 8

 3

 6

 10

 6

 8

 9

 10

 4

 12

 25

 20

 17

 6

 4

 9

 15

 13

 37

 11

 4

 20

 12

 10

 16

C.F.S.

 .00

 .21

 .02

 .14

 .08

 .03

 .06

 .10

 .06

 .08

 .09

 .10

 .04

 .12

 .25

 .20

 .17

 .06

 .04

 .09

 .15

 .13

 .36

 .11

 .04

 .19

 .11

 .09

 .15

INCHES

 .01

 .75

 .68

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .45

 .20

 .26

 .28

 .39

 .10

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

PRECIP

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

FEBRUARY 2008 MILLERTON LAKE DAILY OPERATIONS RUN DATE: May 8, 2008

IN LAKE

EVAPORATION

INCHES

C.F.S.

COMPUTED*

1000 ACRE-FEET

RELEASE - C.F.S. 

TOTALS +45.7 39,641 0 13,178 0 331 3.27 3.12

ACRE-FEET +45,713 78,628 0 26,139 0 657

COMMENTS:

* COMPUTED INFLOW IS THE SUM OF CHANGE IN STORAGE, RELEASES, PUMPING AND EVAPORATION.

SUMMARY

RELEASE (ACRE-FEET)

CANALS

FRIANT-KERN

MADERA

 26,139

 0 32,258

PRECIPITATION

THIS MONTH =

JULY 1, 2007 TO DATE = 10.66

 217.9

 6,119 3.12

CANALS

AT FRIANT

TOTAL RELEASES

OUTLET

 106

 106

 106

 106

 106

 106

 106

 106

 106

 106

 106

 106

 106

 105

 105

 106

 106

 106

 106

 107

 107

 107

 107

 107

 108

 108

 108

 108

 106

RIVER

 3,085

 6,119

RIVER

Table 15
#### SOCIEDAD ARMADORA ARISTOMENIS PANAMA, S. A., Appellant in No. 11460. v. 5020 LONG TONS OF RAW SUGAR and Isbrandtsen Company, Inc., Appellant in No. 11463.

Nos. 11460, 11463.

United States Court of Appeals Third Circuit.

Argued May 20, 1955.

Decided May 31, 1955.

*418Thomas F. Mount, Philadelphia, Pa., (Rawle & Henderson, Joseph W. Henderson, Philadelphia, on the brief), for Sociedad Armadora Aristomenis, Panama, S. A.

Thomas E. Byrne, Jr., Philadelphia, Pa. (Krusen, Evans & Shaw, Philadelphia, Pa., on the brief), for Isbrandtsen Co.

Before McLAUGHLIN, KALODNER and STALEY, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

On respondent’s appeal No. 11,-460, we think that Judge Grim in the district court was sound in his decision that the charge of the Philippine Government amounting to f 1 a ton on the sugar involved was a tax and not a charge for wharfage.

The record supports the disallowance of the setoffs urged by respondent for dispatching and for alleged short delivery.

As to the remaining item for damaged cargo and liability for extra stevedoring, there is ample testimony substantiating the conclusion that libellant had used due care. McAllister v. United States, 1954, 348 U.S. 19, 75 S.Ct. 6.

Nor can we under the McAllister decision hold that the disallowance of libellant's claims in No. 11,463 for additional freight, for demurrage at Iloilo and for excess wharfage at Philadelphia was improper.

The decree of the district court, 122 F.Supp. 892, will be affirmed.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

DAY ELEV

 498.15

 499.03

 500.31

 500.78

 501.25

 501.75

 502.34

 503.01

 503.47

 504.26

 504.73

 505.37

 505.95

 506.52

 507.10

 507.85

 508.93

 509.66

 510.27

 511.13

 511.68

 512.51

 513.35

 513.85

 514.49

 515.20

 516.07

 516.86

 518.29

 519.04

 210.2

 212.8

 216.6

 217.9

 219.3

 220.8

 222.6

 224.6

 226.0

 228.4

 229.8

 231.8

 233.6

 235.3

 237.1

 239.5

 242.9

 245.2

 247.1

 249.9

 251.7

 254.4

 257.1

 258.7

 260.8

 263.2

 266.1

 268.7

 273.5

 276.1

STORAGE

+1.8

+2.6

+3.8

+1.4

+1.4

+1.5

+1.8

+2.0

+1.4

+2.4

+1.4

+2.0

+1.8

+1.8

+1.8

+2.3

+3.4

+2.3

+1.9

+2.7

+1.8

+2.7

+2.7

+1.6

+2.1

+2.3

+2.9

+2.6

+4.8

+2.6

CHANGE

1,064

1,429

2,038

839

864

940

1,053

1,196

854

1,359

865

1,128

1,034

1,027

1,040

1,315

1,846

1,305

1,120

1,534

1,034

1,493

1,522

967

1,204

1,330

1,592

1,477

2,591

1,414

INFLOW

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

MADERA

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

SPILL

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

FRIANT-KERN

 1

 8

 12

 1

 13

 39

 14

 31

 1

 13

 12

 9

 4

 5

 1

 2

 1

 5

 9

 15

 8

 7

 11

 10

 9

 14

 1

 10

 32

 7

C.F.S.

 .01

 .09

 .13

 .01

 .14

 .40

 .14

 .32

 .01

 .13

 .12

 .09

 .04

 .05

 .01

 .02

 .01

 .05

 .09

 .14

 .08

 .07

 .10

 .09

 .08

 .13

 .01

 .09

 .29

 .06

INCHES

 .00

 .00

 .44

 .00

 .01

 .00

 .03

 .09

 .00

 .00

 .20

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .10

 .35

 .00

 .00

 .00

PRECIP

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

NOVEMBER 2004 MILLERTON LAKE DAILY OPERATIONS RUN DATE: December 2, 2004

IN LAKE

EVAPORATION

INCHES

C.F.S.

COMPUTED*

1000 ACRE-FEET

RELEASE - C.F.S. 

TOTALS +67.7 38,474 0 0 0 305 3.00 1.22

ACRE-FEET +67,677 76,313 0 0 0 605

COMMENTS:

* COMPUTED INFLOW IS THE SUM OF CHANGE IN STORAGE, RELEASES, PUMPING AND EVAPORATION.

SUMMARY

RELEASE (ACRE-FEET)

CANALS

FRIANT-KERN

MADERA

 0

 0 8,031

PRECIPITATION

THIS MONTH =

JULY 1, 2004 TO DATE = 4.49

 208.4

 8,031 1.22

CANALS

AT FRIANT

TOTAL RELEASES

OUTLET

 132

 132

 132

 139

 149

 150

 150

 151

 151

 138

 130

 130

 130

 131

 131

 131

 131

 131

 132

 133

 133

 133

 133

 133

 134

 134

 134

 134

 126

 121

RIVER

 4,049

 8,031

RIVER
(No. 73—CC—62

#### Black and Company, Claimant, *vs.*State of Illinois, Department of General Services, Respondent.

*Opinion filed April 11, 1973.*

*266Black and Company, Claimant, pro se.

William J. Scott, Attorney General; William E. Webber, Assistant Attorney General, for Respondent.

Per Curiam.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

DAY ELEV

 123.71

 123.60

 123.31

 123.78

 124.30

 123.77

 123.77

 123.56

 123.23

 124.11

 124.02

 123.69

 122.52

 123.62

 123.70

 123.87

 123.74

 123.76

 123.51

 123.29

 123.30

 123.14

 123.28

 123.05

 122.98

 122.47

 122.35

 123.33

 123.60

 123.78

 8,125

 8,073

 7,937

 8,158

 8,411

 8,153

 8,153

 8,054

 7,899

 8,316

 8,271

 8,115

 7,575

 8,082

 8,120

 8,200

 8,139

 8,148

 8,031

 7,927

 7,932

 7,857

 7,923

 7,815

 7,782

 7,553

 7,499

 7,946

 8,073

 8,158

STORAGE

+361

-52

-136

+221

+253

-258

+0

-99

-155

+417

-45

-156

-540

+507

+38

+80

-61

+9

-117

-104

+5

-75

+66

-108

-33

-229

-54

+447

+127

+85

CHANGE

2,736

2,552

2,281

2,198

2,201

1,951

2,073

2,028

1,995

2,279

1,716

1,460

1,264

1,797

1,573

1,600

1,369

1,568

1,505

1,518

1,437

1,282

1,351

1,264

1,351

1,256

1,362

1,590

1,410

1,375

INFLOW

 2,421

 2,454

 2,234

 1,982

 1,964

 1,966

 1,958

 1,963

 1,959

 1,957

 1,639

 1,439

 1,440

 1,444

 1,457

 1,462

 1,302

 1,466

 1,464

 1,461

 1,319

 1,206

 1,211

 1,246

 1,261

 1,264

 1,281

 1,257

 1,240

 1,225

POWER

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

SPILL

 60

 60

 60

 60

 60

 60

 60

 60

 60

 60

 60

 60

 60

 60

 60

 60

 60

 60

 60

 60

 60

 60

 60

 60

 60

 60

 60

 60

 60

 60

HATCHERY

 4

 4

 4

 4

 2

 3

 3

 3

 2

 3

 2

 3

 1

 2

 2

 3

 3

 2

 3

 2

 2

 2

 1

 1

 2

 2

 3

 3

 1

 2

C.F.S.

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

SEPTEMBER 2007 LAKE NATOMA DAILY OPERATIONS RUN DATE: October 31, 2007

IN LAKE

EVAP

C.F.S.

COMPUTED*

ACRE-FEET

RELEASE - C.F.S.

TOTALS +394 51,342 47,942 0 1,800 74

ACRE-FEET +394 101,837 95,093 0 3,570 147

COMMENTS:

* COMPUTED INFLOW IS THE SUM OF CHANGE IN STORAGE, RELEASES AND EVAPORATION.

SUMMARY

RELEASES (ACRE-FEET)

POWER 95,093

SPILL 0

FOLSOM SOUTH CANAL

HATCHERY

 2,632

 3,570

 7,764

FOLSOM

SOUTH 

 69

 60

 52

 41

 47

 52

 52

 52

 52

 49

 38

 37

 35

 35

 35

 35

 35

 35

 37

 47

 53

 52

 46

 11

 45

 45

 45

 45

 45

 45

 1,327

 2,632

(1)

(1) INCHES OF EVAPORATION TAKEN FROM FOLSOM PAN.

RELEASES (ACRE-FEET) 

TOTAL 101,295

Table 12
# S ed_A η Hardest

Douglas

J. based on an erroneous interpretation of the controlling law and did not reach the other issues colorably asserted. Accordingly, we

REVERSE the order granting judgment on the pleadings AND REMAND this matter to the district court for further proceedings consistent with this order.

CHERRY, J., concurring:

For the reasons stated in the SFR Investments Pool I, LLC v. U.S. Bank, N.A., 130 Nev. 334 P.3d 408 (2014), dissent, I disagree that respondent lost its lien priority by virtue of the homeowners association's nonjudicial foreclosure sale. I recognize, however, that SFR Investments is now the controlling law and, thusly, concur in the disposition of this appeal.

cc: Hon. Timothy C. Williams, District Judge Wright Law Group Akerman LLP/Las Vegas Eighth District Court Clerk

SUPREME COURT

OF NEVADA 2
(0) I947A
§ 19.584 Materials for the production of distilled spirits. A proprietor must maintain daily records of materials produced or received for, or used in, the production of distilled spirits. This includes records covering: ( a ) Receipt and use of fermenting material or other nonalcoholic materials for the production of distilled spirits;
( b ) Receipt and use of spirits, denatured spirits, articles, and spirits residues for redistillation;
( c ) Distilling materials produced, received for production, and used in the production of distilled spirits;
( d ) Receipt of beer from brewery premises without payment of tax, and receipt of beer removed from brewery premises upon determination of tax as authorized by 26 U.S.C. 5222(b);
( e ) Distilling material destroyed in, or removed from the premises before distillation, including residue of beer returned to the producing brewery;
( f ) The quantity of fusel oils or other chemicals removed from the production system, including the disposition thereof, with the name of the consignee, if any, together with the results of alcohol content tests performed on those fusel oils or chemicals; and
( g ) The kind and quantity of distillates removed from the production system pursuant to § 19.307.
(26 U.S.C. 5207)
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY ELEV

 1,900.96

 1,901.32

 1,901.34

 1,901.60

 1,901.49

 1,901.48

 1,901.43

 1,901.37

 1,901.19

 1,900.98

 1,901.13

 1,901.16

 1,901.12

 1,901.05

 1,901.01

 1,901.07

 1,901.05

 1,901.10

 1,900.69

 1,900.65

 1,900.82

 1,901.18

 1,901.21

 1,901.16

 1,901.40

 1,901.73

 1,901.15

 1,901.31

 1,900.97

 1,901.03

 1,901.18

 13,882

 14,150

 14,165

 14,360

 14,278

 14,270

 14,233

 14,188

 14,053

 13,896

 14,008

 14,031

 14,001

 13,948

 13,918

 13,963

 13,948

 13,986

 13,683

 13,653

 13,779

 14,046

 14,068

 14,031

 14,210

 14,457

 14,023

 14,143

 13,889

 13,933

 14,046

STORAGE

+52

+268

+15

+195

-82

-8

-37

-45

-135

-157

+112

+23

-30

-53

-30

+45

-15

+38

-303

-30

+126

+267

+22

-37

+179

+247

-434

+120

-254

+44

+113

CHANGE

348

468

341

440

302

326

313

306

261

258

412

328

307

294

307

344

314

343

1,685

1,667

1,081

1,639

1,678

1,756

1,825

1,759

1,477

1,550

1,523

1,763

1,850

INFLOW

 80

 80

 80

 80

 80

 80

 80

 80

 80

 80

 80

 80

 80

 80

 80

 80

 80

 80

 80

 80

 10

 0

 0

 0

 0

 7

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

POWER

 155

 165

 159

 172

 175

 162

 163

 162

 162

 160

 141

 145

 152

 151

 152

 151

 151

 149

 152

 130

 131

 133

 135

 132

 134

 137

 135

 136

 132

 132

 132

SPILL

 80

 80

 80

 80

 80

 80

 80

 80

 80

 80

 80

 80

 80

 80

 80

 80

 80

 80

 80

 80

 150

 160

 160

 160

 160

 153

 160

 160

 160

 160

 160

OUTLETS

 0

 0

 2

 2

 1

 0

 0

 0

 0

 1

 0

 1

 0

 0

 0

 0

 1

 0

 0

 0

 0

 1

 0

 1

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

C.F.S.

 .00

 .00

 .07

 .11

 .03

 .01

 .02

 .01

 .02

 .03

 .00

 .04

 .01

 .00

 .01

 .02

 .04

 .00

 .01

 .02

 .00

 .03

 .02

 .03

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .02

 .02

INCHES

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

DECEMBER 2012 LEWISTON LAKE DAILY OPERATIONS RUN DATE: January 1, 2013

IN LAKE

EVAPORATION

C.F.S. FRANCIS CARR

COMPUTED*

ACRE-FEET

RELEASE - C.F.S. 

TOTALS +216 27,265 1,617 3,343 4,578 10 .57

ACRE-FEET +216 54,080 3,207 6,631 9,080 20

* COMPUTED INFLOW IS THE SUM OF CHANGE IN STORAGE, RELEASES AND EVAPORATION.

(1) OUTLET RELEASE INCLUDES THE CONTINUOUS FISH RELEASE OF 75 C.F.S.

(2) INCHES OF EVAPORATION TAKEN FROM PAN AT TRINITY RIVER HATCHERY

SUMMARY

RELEASE (ACRE-FEET)

TOTAL POWER 3,207

TOTAL RIVER 18,918 53,845

 13,830

 34,927

RIVER

JUDGE FRANCIS CARR POWERPLANT

TOTAL RELEASE

JUDGE (2)

(1) POWERPLANT

 7

 8

 12

 8

 7

 8

 9

 7

 7

 16

 55

 10

 10

 10

 10

 10

 10

 15

 1,526

 1,392

 726

 1,210

 1,372

 1,482

 1,441

 1,337

 1,401

 1,194

 1,359

 1,449

 1,501

 17,609

 34,927