alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 11 (Tuesday, January 18, 2011)]
[Notices]
[Page 2919]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2011-883]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

Bureau of Ocean Energy Management, Regulation and Enforcement


Outer Continental Shelf Official Protraction Diagram and 
Supplemental Official Outer Continental Shelf Block Diagrams

AGENCY: Bureau of Ocean Energy Management, Regulation and Enforcement 
(BOEMRE), Interior.

ACTION: Availability of Revised North American Datum of 1983 (NAD 83) 
Outer Continental Shelf Official Protraction Diagram and Supplemental 
Official Outer Continental Shelf Block Diagrams.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given that effective with this publication, 
the following NAD 83-based Outer Continental Shelf (OCS) Official 
Protraction Diagram (OPD) and Supplemental Official OCS Block Diagrams 
(SOBDs) located in the Pacific Ocean near Eureka, California, with 
revision date as indicated, are now available. BOEMRE in accordance 
with its authority and responsibility under Title 43, Code of Federal 
Regulations, is updating the basic record used for the description of 
renewable energy, mineral, and oil and gas lease sales in the 
geographic areas they represent. The revised OPD and SOBDs reflect 
updated locations for the Submerged Lands Act (3 nautical mile), and 
Limit of ``8(g) Zone'' (6 nautical mile) boundaries. This announcement 
of the revised OPD and SOBDs is for informational purposes only.

Outer Continental Shelf Official Protraction Diagram in the Pacific 
Ocean

Description/Date

    NK10-10 (Eureka)--2/10/2006.

Supplemental Official Outer Continental Shelf Block Diagrams in the 
Pacific Ocean, all located within Official Protraction Diagram NK10-10 
(Eureka)

Boundary revised/Date/Block Numbers

    Submerged Lands Act boundary Blocks (7)--2/10/2006: 6678, 6627, 
6628, 6577, 6578, 6528, and 6529.
    Limit of ``8(g) Zone'' Blocks (10)--2/10/2006: 6728, 6727, 6677, 
6676, 6626, 6576, 6526, 6527, 6477, and 6478.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Steven Textoris, Acting Chief, Leasing 
Division at (703) 787-1223 or via e-mail at <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#184b6c7d6e7d76364c7d606c776a716b587a777d756a7d367f776e"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="1142657467747f3f457469657e63786251737e747c63743f767e67">[email protected]</span></a>. 
Copies of the revised OPD and SOBDs are available for download in .pdf 
format from: http://www.boemre.gov/offshore/mapping/pacific.htm.

    Dated: November 15, 2010.
Robert P. LaBelle,
Acting Associate Director for Offshore Energy and Minerals Management.
[FR Doc. 2011-883 Filed 1-14-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-MR-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY

 23,547

 23,541

 23,547

 23,657

 23,732

 23,409

 23,137

 22,745

 22,268

 21,800

 21,570

 21,018

 20,686

 20,485

 20,429

 20,286

 20,167

 19,842

 18,997

 19,003

 20,319

 20,608

 20,491

 20,408

 20,220

 20,316

 20,141

 19,753

 19,806

 19,647

 19,464

 25,184

 24,893

 24,574

 24,131

 23,739

 23,770

 23,721

 23,814

 24,006

 24,171

 24,086

 24,167

 24,171

 24,051

 23,752

 23,574

 23,308

 23,317

 23,748

 23,707

 24,167

 23,810

 23,921

 23,832

 23,894

 23,677

 23,926

 24,502

 24,578

 24,857

 25,170

STORAGE - A.F. 

 48,731

 48,434

 48,121

 47,788

 47,471

 47,179

 46,858

 46,559

 46,274

 45,971

 45,656

 45,185

 44,857

 44,536

 44,181

 43,860

 43,475

 43,159

 42,745

 42,710

 44,486

 44,418

 44,412

 44,240

 44,114

 43,993

 44,067

 44,255

 44,384

 44,504

 44,634

589

599

428

655

497

632

514

559

555

504

598

503

555

564

416

539

558

621

708

1,140

2,606

1,213

1,796

795

744

558

662

499

371

436

496

437

449

270

487

337

485

352

408

411

351

439

266

390

402

237

377

364

462

499

1,122

3,501

1,179

1,793

708

680

497

699

594

436

496

562

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

JANUARY 2012 FULL NATURAL FLOW AT NEW MELONES DAM RUN DATE: 08/02/2012

TOTALS -4,399 19,690

* October 1, 39,055

 98.7

 99.6

 100.2

 101.1

 101.8

 102.7

 103.4

 104.3

 105.1

 105.8

 106.6

 107.2

 107.9

 108.7

 109.2

 110.0

 110.7

 111.6

 112.6

 114.8

 121.8

 124.1

 127.6

 129.1

 130.4

 131.4

 132.8

 133.9

 134.8

 135.8

 136.9

DONNELLS

RES

BEARDSLEY

RES

2011 TO DATE

NEW

MELONES

INFLOW

C.F.S

NATURAL

RIVER

C.F.S

ACCUM *

FULL

NATURAL

1000 A.F.

RESERVOIR

TOTAL

-302

-297

-313

-333

-317

-292

-321

-299

-285

-303

-315

-471

-328

-321

-355

-321

-385

-316

-414

-35

+1,776

-68

-6

-172

-126

-121

+74

+188

+129

+120

+130

CHANGE

A.F. C.F.S.

-152

-150

-158

-168

-160

-147

-162

-151

-144

-153

-159

-237

-165

-162

-179

-162

-194

-159

-209

-18

+895

-34

-3

-87

-64

-61

+37

+95

+65

+60

+66
<PAGE>

                                                                      EXHIBIT 23

                         INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' CONSENT



The Board of Directors
Casual Male Corp.


We consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration Statements of
Casual Male Corp. on Form S-8 No. 33-10385, No. 33-20302, No. 33-39425, No. 33-
59786, No. 33-59788, No. 33-59790 and No. 33-60605, and on Form S-3 No. 33-
51645, No. 333-2797 and No. 333-35923 of our report dated March 21, 2001, except
for Note 12, as to which the date is December 10, 2001 appearing in the Annual
Report on Form 10-K of Casual Male Corp. for the year ended February 3, 2001.
Our report contains an explanatory paragraph that states that the Company has
filed a petition for reorganization under Chapter 11 of the Bankruptcy Code and
has a net capital deficiency, which raise substantial doubt about its ability
to continue as a going concern. The consolidated financial statements do not
include any adjustments that might result from the outcome of that uncertainty.



                                          /s/  KPMG Peat Marwick LLP
                                          --------------------------------
                                          KPMG Peat Marwick LLP


Boston, Massachusetts
December 14, 2001
Editorial Note on Part 40
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 40 appear by T.D. ATF-460, 66 FR 39094-39096, July 27, 2001; T.D. ATF-464, 66 FR 43479, Aug. 20, 2001; and T.D. TTB-91, 76 FR 5479, Feb. 1, 2011.

§ 40.61 Qualification. ( a ) *General.* Except as otherwise provided in paragraph (b) of this section, every person who manufactures tobacco products must qualify for, and obtain, a permit as a manufacturer of tobacco products in accordance with the provisions of this part.
( b ) *Exceptions.* The following persons are not considered to be engaged in the business of manufacturing tobacco products for purposes of this part: ( 1 ) A person who produces tobacco products solely for that person's own consumption or use;
( 2 ) A proprietor of a customs bonded manufacturing warehouse with respect to the operation of such warehouse;
( 3 ) A retailer of tobacco products, such as a tobacconist, who takes taxpaid tobacco products out of the package, as that term is defined in § 40.11, in front of waiting customers and places the tobacco products into a different container for immediate delivery to those customers; or
( 4 ) A person whose operations are limited to, and who holds a permit as, a manufacturer of processed tobacco.
( c ) *Minimum manufacturing and activity requirements.* A permit to manufacture tobacco products will only be granted to those persons whose principal business activity under such permit will be the manufacture of tobacco products. A permit will not be granted to any person whose principal business activity under such permit will be to receive or transfer tobacco products in bond. As a minimum activity requirement, in order to qualify for a permit, the quantity of tobacco products manufactured under the permit must be equivalent to, or exceed, the quantity to be transferred or received in bond under the permit. For the purposes of this section, the activity of packaging processed tobacco may be sufficient to qualify as a manufacturing activity.
[T.D. TTB-78, 74 FR 29409, June 22, 2009]
(No. 74-CC-495

#### Allied Handling Equipment Co., Claimant, *vs.*State of Illinois, Department of Mental Health, Respondent.

*Opinion filed April 2, 1974.*

Allied Handling Equipment Co., Claimant, pro se.

William J. Scott, Attorney General; Howard W. Feldman, Assistant Attorney General, for Respondent.

Per Curiam.
#### QIN FAN LI, Petitioner, v. Alberto R. GONZALES, Attorney General, Respondent.

No. 05-3763.

United States Court of Appeals, Second Circuit.

June 19, 2006.

*26Frank R. Liu, New York, NY, for Petitioner.

Mary Beth Buchanan, United States Attorney, Troy Rivetti, Assistant United States Attorney, Pittsburgh, PA, for Respondent.

Present WILFRED FEINBERG, GUIDO CALABRESI and PETER W. HALL, Circuit Judges.

SUMMARY ORDER

UPON DUE CONSIDERATION of this petition for review from a decision of the Board of Immigration Appeals (“BIA”), it is hereby ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that the petition for review is DENIED.

Qin Fan Li, a native and citizen of China filed a petition for review of a BIA decision affirming Immigration Judge (“IJ”) Theresa Holmes-Simmons’s denial of asylum, withholding of removal and Convention Against Torture (“CAT”) relief. We assume the parties’ familiarity with the underlying facts and procedural history of the case.

This Court reviews the IJ’s decision where, as here, the BIA summarily affirms the IJ’s decision without opinion. *See Twum v. INS,*411 F.3d 54, 58 (2d Cir. 2005). This Court reviews the agency’s factual findings, including adverse credibility determinations, under the substantial evidence standard, treating them as “conclusive unless any reasonable adjudicator would be compelled to conclude to the contrary.” 8 U.S.C. § 1252(b)(4)(B); *see Zhou Yun Zhang v. INS,*386 F.3d 66, 73 *&*n. 7 (2d Cir.2004).

Substantial evidence supports the IJ’s findings of discrepancies between Li’s written application for asylum, his asylum interview, his oral testimony, his supplemental statement, and his documentary evidence. In particular: (1) Li testified that his wife was forcibly sterilized on two separate occasions, yet in his initial asylum application and in his statements at his asylum interview, Lin failed to mention that his wife was ever sterilized; (2) Li testified that he and his wife were married in November 1987, yet the marriage-birth control certificate indicates they Li and his wife were married in September 1984; and (3) the marriage-birth control certificate does not mention Li’s wife’s second sterilization or her abortion in October 1992.

A petitioner must raise issues to the agency in order to preserve them for judicial review. *See Ivanishvili v. U.S. Dep’t of Justice,*433 F.3d 332, 343 (2d Cir.2006); 8 U.S.C. § 1252(d)(1). In his appeal to the BIA, Li failed to meaningfully challenge the IJ’s denial of his withholding of removal and CAT claims; therefore, this Court lacks the jurisdiction to review those claims.

For the foregoing reasons, the petition for review is DENIED. Having completed our review, any stay of removal the Court previously granted in this petition is VACATED, and any pending motion for a stay of removal in this petition is DENIED as moot. Any pending request for oral argument in this petition is DENIED in accordance with Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure 34(a)(2), and Second Circuit Local Rule 34(d)(1).
Editorial Note on Part 53
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 53 appear by T.D. ATF-447, 66 FR 19088, Apr. 13, 2001.

§ 53.142 Denial, revocation or suspension of registration. ( a ) The appropriate TTB officer is authorized to deny, revoke or temporarily suspend, upon written notice, the registration of any person and the right of such person to sell or purchase articles tax free under section 4221 of the Code in any case in which he finds that: ( 1 ) The registrant is not a bona fide manufacturer, or a purchaser reselling direct to manufacturers or exporters;
( 2 ) The registrant is for some other reason not eligible under these regulations to retain a Certificate of Registry; or
( 3 ) The registrant has used his registration to avoid payment of the tax imposed by section 4181 of the Code, or to postpone or interfere in any manner with the collection of such tax;
( 4 ) Such denial, revocation, or suspension is necessary to protect the revenue; or
( 5 ) The registrant failed to comply with the requirements of paragraph (c) of § 53.140, relating to the evidence required to support a tax-free sale.
( b ) The denial, revocation, or suspension of registration is in addition to any other penalty that may apply under the law for any act or failure to act.
[T.D. ATF-308, 56 FR 303, Jan. 3, 1991, as amended by T.D. ATF-365, 60 FR 33671, June 28, 1995]
EXHIBIT 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION
1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, John P.
Jordan, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Quarterly Report of
Zygo Corporation on Form 10-Q/A for the fiscal quarter ended December 31, 2010,
as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report), fully
complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in the Report fairly
presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
operations of Zygo Corporation.

A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to
Zygo Corporation and will be retained by Zygo Corporation and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

| |                                             | 
| | ------------------------------------------- | 
| | Dated: May
 10, 2011                       
| |                                            
| | /s/ John P.
 Jordan                         | 
| |                                             | 
| | John P.
 Jordan                            
| | Vice
 President and Chief Financial Officer
| | of Zygo
 Corporation                       

---
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

DAY ELEV

 998.98

 999.23

 999.78

 1,000.33

 1,000.78

 1,001.23

 1,001.50

 1,001.78

 1,002.01

 1,002.14

 1,002.22

 1,002.19

 1,002.14

 1,002.05

 1,001.90

 1,001.76

 1,001.64

 1,001.44

 1,001.12

 1,000.89

 1,000.59

 1,000.30

 1,000.12

 999.50

 999.22

 998.94

 998.67

 998.27

 997.80

 997.38

 1,461.8

 1,464.1

 1,469.2

 1,474.2

 1,478.3

 1,482.5

 1,485.0

 1,487.6

 1,489.7

 1,490.9

 1,491.6

 1,491.4

 1,490.9

 1,490.1

 1,488.7

 1,487.4

 1,486.3

 1,484.4

 1,481.5

 1,479.4

 1,476.6

 1,473.9

 1,472.3

 1,466.6

 1,464.0

 1,461.5

 1,459.0

 1,455.3

 1,451.1

 1,447.2

STORAGE

+2.4

+2.3

+5.0

+5.1

+4.1

+4.1

+2.5

+2.6

+2.1

+1.2

+0.7

-0.3

-0.5

-0.8

-1.4

-1.3

-1.1

-1.8

-3.0

-2.1

-2.8

-2.7

-1.7

-5.7

-2.6

-2.6

-2.5

-3.7

-4.3

-3.8

CHANGE

3,475

3,983

4,370

4,903

4,534

4,382

3,836

3,683

3,473

3,280

2,976

2,496

2,394

2,129

2,015

2,386

2,182

1,887

1,599

1,701

1,470

1,186

2,232

210

1,240

1,248

1,348

1,093

1,015

1,033

INFLOW

 2,205

 2,733

 1,707

 2,206

 2,342

 2,190

 2,483

 2,295

 2,315

 2,549

 2,518

 2,553

 2,549

 2,465

 2,616

 2,924

 2,636

 2,687

 3,002

 2,669

 2,760

 2,440

 2,969

 2,955

 2,436

 2,402

 2,452

 2,789

 3,034

 2,818

POWER

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

SPILL

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

OUTLET

 74

 95

 122

 149

 104

 101

 96

 84

 87

 123

 84

 84

 78

 84

 99

 114

 105

 131

 87

 101

 101

 92

 98

 122

 98

 139

 139

 145

 141

 141

C.F.S.

 .25

 .32

 .41

 .50

 .35

 .34

 .32

 .28

 .29

 .41

 .28

 .28

 .26

 .28

 .33

 .38

 .35

 .44

 .29

 .34

 .34

 .31

 .33

 .41

 .33

 .47

 .47

 .49

 .48

 .48

INCHES

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

PRECIP

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

JUNE 2003 NEW MELONES LAKE DAILY OPERATIONS RUN DATE: March 12, 2004

IN LAKE

EVAPORATION

INCHES

C.F.S.

COMPUTED*

1000 ACRE-FEET

RELEASE - C.F.S.

TOTALS -12.6 73,759 76,699 0 0 3,218 10.81 .00

ACRE-FEET -12,600 146,301 152,132 0 0 6,383

COMMENTS:

* COMPUTED INFLOW IS THE SUM OF CHANGE IN STORAGE, RELEASES AND EVAPORATION.

SUMMARY

RELEASE (ACRE-FEET)

POWER 152,132

SPILL 0

OUTLET

TOTAL

 0

 152,132

PRECIPITATION

THIS MONTH =

TO DATE =

 .00

JULY 1, 2002 24.20

 1,459.4
#### Percy JACKSON, Appellant, v. UNITED STATES of America, Appellee.

No. 12306.

United States Court of Appeals Sixth Circuit.

June 9, 1955.

Percy Jackson, pro se.

George E. Woods, Asst. U. S. Atty., Detroit, Mich. (Fred W. Kaess, U. S. Atty., Detroit, Mich., on the brief), for appellee.

Before ALLEN, MARTIN and MCALLISTER, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

This is an appeal from the denial of a motion to vacate sentence. The denial was put by Judge Koscinski into the form of carefully prepared and correct findings of fact and conclusions of law, which succinctly and accurately state the reasons for denial of the motion.

Upon the trial to the judge without a jury, appellant was sentenced to ten years’ imprisonment as a habitual violator, his third conviction being based on an indictment charging the unlawful possession of heroin, a narcotic drug. At the trial, the defendant was well represented by counsel of his own choosing. On the motion to vacate sentence, made under section 2255, Title 28, U.S.C.A., he charges that illegally obtained evidence was admitted.

The point raised is the same that was made in Frierson v. United States, 6 Cir., 223 F.2d 255, heard on the same date and decided simultaneously herewith. Upon the authority of Davilman v. United States, 6 Cir., 180 F.2d 284; and Irvine v. People of State of California, 347 U.S. 128, 134, 74 S.Ct. 381, 98 L.Ed. 561;

The judgment of the district court is affirmed.
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
 WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549
 FORM 8-K
 CURRENT REPORT
Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
 Date of Report (Date of Earliest Event Reported): July 6, 2011
 Emisphere Technologies, Inc.
  
 Delaware
    
    000-17758
    
    13-3306985(State or other jurisdiction 
of incorporation)
    
    (Commission
File Number)
    
    (I.R.S. Employer
Identification No.)
 240 Cedar Knolls Road, Suite 200Cedar Knolls, NJ
    
    07927(Address of principal executive offices)
    
    (Zip Code)
  
  o
    
    Written communications pursuant to Rule 425 under the Securities Act (17 CFR 230.425)
 o
    
    Soliciting material pursuant to Rule 14a-12 under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.14a-12)
 o
    
    Pre-commencement communications pursuant to Rule 14d-2(b) under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.14d-2(b))
 o
    
    Pre-commencement communications pursuant to Rule 13e-4(c) under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.13e-4(c))




---



##### 



Item 8.01.
    
    Other Events.




---



##### 



SIGNATURES
  Emisphere Technologies, Inc.July 7, 2011
    By:
    /s/ Michael R. GaroneName:
    Michael R. GaroneTitle:
    Interim Chief Executive Officer and
Chief Financial Officer
#### Crocker-Wheeler Company, Appellant, v. Genesee Recreation Company, Respondent.

Motion for reargument granted; reargument tobe heard on the 11th day of March, 1914.
Order filed December 4, 2014. 

In The

Fourteenth Court of Appeals

____________

NO. 14-14-00904-CV

____________

IN RE ONE THOUSAND SIX HUNDRED FOUR DOLLARS & NINE 

CENTS ($1,604.09) IN U.S. CURRENCY

QUINCY DESHAN BUTLER, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the 506th Judicial District Court

Waller County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 11-06-20924

O R D E R

This is an appeal from a summary judgment signed July 28, 2014. The 

clerk’s record was filed December 2, 2014. The record reflects that appellant filed 

a timely motion for new trial on August 19, 2014. The notice of appeal was due 

October 27, 2014. See Tex. R. App. P. 26.1. Appellant’s notice of appeal was not 

filed until November 7, 2014, and the certificate of service reflects that it was 
mailed on October 31, 2014. The notice of appeal was filed within 15 days of the 

due date. A motion for extension of time is “necessarily implied” when the 

perfecting instrument is filed within fifteen days of its due date. Verburgt v. 

Dorner, 959 S.W.2d 615, 617 (Tex. 1997). Appellant did not file a motion to 

extend time to file the notice of appeal. While an extension may be implied, 

appellant is still obligated to come forward with a reasonable explanation to 

support the late filing. See Miller v. Greenpark Surgery Center Assocs., Ltd., 974 

S.W.2d 805, 808 (Tex. App.—Houston [14th Dist.] 1998, no pet.). 

Accordingly, we ORDER appellant to file a proper motion to extend time to 

file the notice of appeal on or before December 22, 2014. See Tex. R. App. P.

26.3; 10.5(b). If appellant does not comply with this order, we will dismiss the 

appeal. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.3.

PER CURIAM
### [§2198. Repealed. Pub. L. 101–647, title XII, §1207(b), Nov. 29, 1990, 104 Stat. 4832]

Section, act June 25, 1948, ch. 645, 62 Stat. 802, related to penalties for seducing a female passenger on an American vessel by employees of the vessel.