alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY HIGH

 374

 369

 369

 372

 374

 367

 364

 363

 359

 356

 358

 357

 357

 360

 366

 372

 369

 371

 368

 372

 374

 378

 383

 383

 393

 407

 421

 426

 451

 463

 514

 333

 329

 325

 328

 303

 320

 307

 322

 337

 332

 319

 321

 335

 333

 326

 334

 331

 325

 338

 342

 343

 350

 346

 356

 364

 369

 376

 377

 378

 382

 398

 349

 350

 351

 350

 347

 349

 346

 345

 346

 346

 342

 346

 344

 343

 345

 347

 351

 350

 354

 356

 359

 363

 367

 369

 374

 384

 392

 399

 408

 419

 445

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

JANUARY 2015 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: February 2, 2015

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

HOLLAND TRACT ON OLD RIVER
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY ELEV

 1,900.79

 1,900.77

 1,900.84

 1,901.05

 1,901.30

 1,901.31

 1,901.10

 1,901.25

 1,901.29

 1,901.36

 1,901.32

 1,901.03

 1,900.82

 1,900.74

 1,900.62

 1,900.48

 1,900.91

 1,900.94

 1,901.12

 1,901.29

 1,901.16

 1,901.59

 1,901.62

 1,901.63

 1,901.48

 1,901.36

 1,901.27

 1,901.43

 1,901.56

 1,901.55

 1,901.38

 13,756

 13,742

 13,793

 13,948

 14,135

 14,143

 13,986

 14,098

 14,128

 14,180

 14,150

 13,933

 13,779

 13,720

 13,631

 13,528

 13,845

 13,867

 14,001

 14,128

 14,031

 14,352

 14,375

 14,382

 14,270

 14,180

 14,113

 14,233

 14,330

 14,322

 14,195

STORAGE

-103

-14

+51

+155

+187

+8

-157

+112

+30

+52

-30

-217

-154

-59

-89

-103

+317

+22

+134

+127

-97

+321

+23

+7

-112

-90

-67

+120

+97

-8

-127

CHANGE

881

870

922

960

974

890

806

878

889

897

890

812

807

862

861

907

1,011

856

681

659

493

715

589

567

521

540

554

616

605

371

322

INFLOW

 80

 80

 80

 80

 80

 80

 80

 80

 80

 80

 80

 80

 80

 80

 80

 80

 80

 80

 80

 80

 80

 80

 80

 80

 80

 80

 80

 80

 80

 80

 80

POWER

 164

 164

 166

 164

 168

 171

 162

 164

 159

 159

 160

 162

 162

 148

 143

 154

 164

 164

 164

 151

 140

 147

 154

 157

 157

 156

 154

 154

 156

 156

 156

SPILL

 65

 65

 65

 65

 65

 65

 65

 65

 65

 65

 65

 65

 65

 65

 65

 65

 65

 65

 65

 65

 65

 65

 65

 65

 65

 65

 65

 65

 65

 65

 65

OUTLETS

 2

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 1

 1

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 4

 2

 0

 0

 0

 2

 0

 1

 1

C.F.S.

 .08

 .01

 .01

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .04

 .03

 .00

 .01

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .19

 .07

 .00

 .02

 .00

 .11

 .00

 .04

 .04

INCHES

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

JANUARY 2007 LEWISTON LAKE DAILY OPERATIONS RUN DATE: May 16, 2007

IN LAKE

EVAPORATION

C.F.S. FRANCIS CARR

COMPUTED*

ACRE-FEET

RELEASE - C.F.S. 

TOTALS +336 23,206 2,480 2,015 4,900 14 .65

ACRE-FEET +336 46,029 4,919 3,997 9,719 28

* COMPUTED INFLOW IS THE SUM OF CHANGE IN STORAGE, RELEASES AND EVAPORATION.

(1) OUTLET RELEASE INCLUDES THE CONTINUOUS FISH RELEASE OF 75 C.F.S.

SUMMARY

RELEASE (ACRE-FEET)

TOTAL POWER 4,919

TOTAL RIVER 18,635 47,241

 13,859

 28,606

RIVER

JUDGE FRANCIS CARR POWERPLANT

TOTAL RELEASE

JUDGE (2)

(1) POWERPLANT

 622

 568

 585

 573

 567

 570

 577

 512

 570

 567

 600

 614

 578

 599

 618

 660

 595

 589

 357

 352

 310

 314

 327

 312

 328

 337

 342

 308

 308

 126

 137

 14,422

 28,606

Table 6
FIRST DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

STATE OF FLORIDA

_____________________________

No. 1D18-4975

_____________________________

SEAN JESSIE FLEMON,

Petitioner,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Respondent.

_____________________________

Petition Alleging Ineffective Assistance of Appellate Counsel—

Original Jurisdiction.

January 16, 2019

PER CURIAM.

The petition alleging ineffective assistance of appellate 

counsel is denied on the merits.

ROBERTS, KELSEY, and WINSOR, JJ., concur.

_____________________________

Not final until disposition of any timely and 

authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 

9.331.

_____________________________
2

Sean Jessie Flemon, pro se, Petitioner.

Ashley Brooke Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, for 

Respondent.
#### 30 East 72nd Street Realty Corporation v. Jennie D. Cardozo et al., as Executors of William B. Cardozo, Deceased.

Present — Martin, P. J., Untermyer, Dore, Cohn and Callahan, JJ.
Editorial Note on Part 25
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 25 appear by T.D. ATF-437, 66 FR 5478, 5479, Jan. 19, 2001.

§ 25.261 General. ( a ) *Authorized processes.* A brewer may, in accordance with this subpart— ( 1 ) Produce concentrate from beer,
( 2 ) Reconstitute beer from concentrate,
( 3 ) Transfer concentrate from one brewery to another brewery of the same ownership, and
( 4 ) Remove concentrate without payment of tax for exportation, or for transfer to and deposit in a foreign-trade zone for exportation or for storage pending exportation in accordance with part 28 of this chapter.
( b ) *Brewery treatment of concentrate.* Beer reconstituted from concentrate in accordance with this subpart shall (except with respect to the additional labeling of reconstituted beer under § 25.263) be treated the same as beer which has not been concentrated and reconstituted.
(Sec. 201, Pub. L. 85-859, 72 Stat. 1388, as amended (26 U.S.C. 5401))
[T.D. ATF-224, 51 FR 7673, Mar. 5, 1986, as amended by T.D. TTB-8, 69 FR 3830, Jan. 27, 2004]
### Part C—Federal Work-Study Programs

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Part C of title IV of the Higher Education Act of 1965, Pub. L. 89–329, which comprises this part, was originally enacted as part C of title I of the Economic Opportunity Act of 1964, Pub. L. 88–452, Aug. 20, 1964, 78 Stat. 513, and amended by Pub. L. 89–253, Oct. 9, 1965, 79 Stat. 973; Pub. L. 89–329, Nov. 8, 1965, 79 Stat. 1219; Pub. L. 90–82, Sept. 6, 1967, 81 Stat. 194; and Pub. L. 90–222, Dec. 23, 1967, 81 Stat. 672. It was redesignated as part C of title IV of Pub. L. 89–329 and amended by Pub. L. 90–575, Oct. 16, 1968, 82 Stat. 1014, and further amended by Pub. L. 91–95, Oct. 22, 1969, 83 Stat. 141; Pub. L. 92–318, June 23, 1972, 86 Stat. 235; Pub. L. 94–43, June 28, 1975, 89 Stat. 233; Pub. L. 94–482, Oct. 12, 1976, 90 Stat. 2081; and Pub. L. 96–374, Oct. 3, 1980, 94 Stat. 1367. Such part is shown herein, however, as having been added by Pub. L. 99–498, title IV, §403(a), Oct. 17, 1986, 100 Stat. 1429, without reference to such intervening amendments because of the extensive revision of part C by Pub. L. 99–498. For complete credit information on amendatory acts prior to Pub. L. 99–498, see Prior Provisions notes under individual sections within this part.

Part was formerly classified to part C (§2751 et seq.) of subchapter I of chapter 34 of Title 42, The Public Health and Welfare, prior to transfer to this part.

Pub. L. 102–325, title IV, §441(a)(1), July 23, 1992, 106 Stat. 563, substituted "Federal Work-Study Programs" for "Work-Study Programs" in part heading.

#### Prior Provisions

A prior part C of this subchapter, consisting of part D of title IV of Pub. L. 89–329, was redesignated part D of this subchapter.

A prior part C of title IV of Pub. L. 89–329, Nov. 8, 1965, 79 Stat. 1249, consisting of sections 441 and 442, was repealed by Pub. L. 90–575, title I, §131(a), Oct. 16, 1968, 82 Stat. 1028, in order to accommodate the redesignation and transfer of former part C of title I of Pub. L. 88–452. See Codification note above. Prior section 441 made various amendments to parts C and D of title I of Pub. L. 88–452, and, notwithstanding the repeal of section 441, those amendments were not struck out. Prior section 442 was classified to section 2757 of Title 42, The Public Health and Welfare.
### SUBCHAPTER III—PARTNERSHIPS IN EDUCATION FOR MATHEMATICS, SCIENCE, AND ENGINEERING
Court of Appeals

Sixth Appellate District of Texas

J U D G M E N T

Justin Sanders, Appellant

No. 06-14-00079-CR v.

The State of Texas, Appellee

Appeal from the 102nd District Court of 

Bowie County, Texas (Tr. Ct. No. 13F1051-

102). Memorandum Opinion delivered by 

Justice Moseley, Chief Justice Morriss and 

Justice Carter* participating. *Justice 

Carter, Sitting by Assignment.

As stated in the Court’s opinion of this date, we find no error in the judgment of the court 

below. We affirm the judgment of the trial court.

We note that the appellant, Justin Sanders, has adequately indicated his inability to pay 

costs of appeal. Therefore, we waive payment of costs.

RENDERED AUGUST 12, 2015

BY ORDER OF THE COURT

JOSH R. MORRISS, III

CHIEF JUSTICE

ATTEST:

Debra K. Autrey, Clerk
###### Editorial Note on Part 40

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 40 appear by T.D. ATF-460, 66 FR 39094-39096, July 27, 2001; T.D. ATF-464, 66 FR 43479, Aug. 20, 2001; and T.D. TTB-91, 76 FR 5479, Feb. 1, 2011.

#### § 40.301 Action by claimant.

Where tobacco products are lost (otherwise than by theft) or destroyed, by fire, casualty, or act of God, and the manufacturer desires to file a claim for the tax on such products under the provisions of § 40.282 or § 40.283, he shall indicate on the claim the nature, date, place, and extent of such loss or destruction. The claim shall be accompanied by such evidence as is necessary to establish to the satisfaction of the appropriate TTB officer that the claim is valid.

(72 Stat. 1419, as amended; 26 U.S.C. 5705)

[T.D. 6871, 31 FR 39, Jan. 4, 1966. Redesignated at 40 FR 16835, Apr. 15, 1975, and amended by T.D. ATF-232, 51 FR 28083, Aug. 5, 1986; T.D. ATF-243, 52 FR 43194, Dec. 1, 1986]
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY ELEV

 582.74

 584.68

 585.33

 585.19

 584.46

 582.94

 582.12

 582.63

 583.73

 583.97

 583.06

 584.63

 584.18

 584.53

 583.71

 583.29

 583.99

 581.43

 583.06

 583.68

 583.68

 583.82

 585.79

 583.77

 583.31

 582.92

 581.31

 579.12

 580.48

 580.19

 580.70

 21,128

 22,310

 22,714

 22,626

 22,174

 21,247

 20,758

 21,062

 21,726

 21,872

 21,319

 22,279

 22,001

 22,217

 21,714

 21,459

 21,884

 20,352

 21,319

 21,696

 21,696

 21,781

 23,003

 21,750

 21,471

 21,235

 20,282

 19,029

 19,800

 19,633

 19,927

STORAGE

-641

+1,182

+404

-88

-452

-927

-489

+304

+664

+146

-553

+960

-278

+216

-503

-255

+425

-1,532

+967

+377

+0

+85

+1,222

-1,253

-279

-236

-953

-1,253

+771

-167

+294

CHANGE

7,228

8,182

7,793

7,599

7,491

7,238

7,481

7,871

8,050

7,787

7,437

8,243

7,624

7,881

7,507

7,638

8,039

6,906

7,994

7,690

7,510

7,620

7,074

5,514

6,138

6,365

6,005

5,853

6,870

6,392

6,631

INFLOW

 7,466

 7,501

 7,503

 7,556

 7,633

 7,620

 7,640

 7,630

 7,625

 7,623

 7,627

 7,670

 7,676

 7,682

 7,672

 7,678

 7,735

 7,590

 7,418

 7,411

 7,421

 7,491

 6,370

 6,058

 6,191

 6,396

 6,400

 6,398

 6,394

 6,389

 6,396

POWER

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

SPILL

 85

 85

 85

 85

 85

 85

 85

 85

 85

 85

 85

 85

 85

 85

 85

 85

 85

 85

 85

 85

 85

 85

 85

 85

 85

 85

 85

 85

 85

 85

 85

FISHTRAP

 0

 0

 1

 2

 1

 0

 3

 3

 5

 5

 4

 4

 3

 5

 4

 4

 5

 3

 3

 4

 4

 1

 3

 3

 3

 3

 0

 2

 2

 2

 2

C.F.S.

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

OCTOBER 2018 KESWICK RESERVOIR DAILY OPERATIONS RUN DATE: November 13, 2018

RES.

EVAP

C.F.S.

COMPUTED*

ACRE-FEET

RELEASE - C.F.S. 

TOTALS -1,842 225,651 223,860 0 2,635 84

ACRE-FEET -1,842 447,579 444,026 0 5,227 167

SUMMARY

RELEASE (ACRE-FEET)

POWER 444,026

SPILL 0

 21,769

FISH TRAP 5,227

SPRING

CR. P. P.

RELEASE (1)

 380

 528

 1,162

 450

 1,191

 1,260

 311

 310

 242

 261

 261

 261

 415

 14

 14

 14

 14

 163

 458

 184

 28

 16

 54

 41

 17

 14

 14

 14

 14

 14

 18

 8,137

 16,140

*COMPUTED INFLOW IS SUM OF CHANGE IN STORAGE, RELEASES, AND EVAPORATION.

(1) EVAPORATION RECORDS TAKEN FROM SHASTA PAN.

SHASTA

RELEASE

C.F.S

 6,210

 6,991

 6,099

 6,396

 5,599

 5,261

 6,466

 6,849

 6,994

 6,732

 6,496

 7,206

 6,424

 7,124

 6,715

 6,796

 7,268

 6,184

 6,953

 7,022

 6,955

 7,035

 6,429

 4,889

 5,547

 5,812

 5,485

 5,293

 6,345

 5,865

 6,086

 197,526

 391,793

Table 8
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

DAY HIGH

 159

 157

 158

 154

 151

 150

 152

 146

 143

 144

 142

 142

 142

 141

 141

 142

 143

 144

 147

 149

 152

 149

 146

 151

 148

 144

 142

 143

 143

 147

 149

 144

 141

 140

 139

 138

 137

 138

 137

 138

 137

 133

 127

 132

 131

 132

 132

 132

 131

 134

 134

 134

 132

 133

 135

 134

 134

 134

 133

 133

 154

 151

 149

 146

 145

 143

 143

 141

 140

 140

 139

 137

 135

 136

 136

 136

 136

 137

 138

 139

 141

 139

 137

 139

 138

 138

 138

 137

 138

 139

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

JUNE 2005 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: July 11, 2005

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

14 DAY

ACCUM

MEAN

14 DAY 

AVG

MEAN

 2,358

 2,315

 2,272

 2,232

 2,199

 2,174

 2,153

 2,131

 2,109

 2,088

 2,067

 2,044

 2,020

 1,999

 1,981

 1,966

 1,953

 1,944

 1,937

 1,933

 1,931

 1,929

 1,926

 1,925

 1,924

 1,925

 1,928

 1,929

 1,931

 1,934

 168

 165

 162

 159

 157

 155

 154

 152

 151

 149

 148

 146

 144

 143

 142

 140

 140

 139

 138

 138

 138

 138

 138

 138

 137

 138

 138

 138

 138

 138

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

JERSEY POINT TOP ON THE SAN JOAQUIN RIVER
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ENACTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of United Bancorp, Inc. (the "Company")
on Form 10-Q for the period ending September 30, 2005 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, James
W. Everson, Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as enacted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
          of the Company.


/s/ James W. Everson
-------------------------------------
James W. Everson,
Chairman, President and Chief
Executive Officer

November 14, 2006
###### Editorial Note on Part 40

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 40 appear by T.D. ATF-460, 66 FR 39094-39096, July 27, 2001; T.D. ATF-464, 66 FR 43479, Aug. 20, 2001; and T.D. TTB-91, 76 FR 5479, Feb. 1, 2011.

#### § 40.532 Emergency variations from requirements.

The appropriate TTB officer may approve methods of operation other than as specified in this subpart, where it is determined that an emergency exists and the proposed variations from the specified requirements are necessary, and provided that the proposed variations will not hinder the effective administration of this subpart and will not be contrary to any provision of law. Variations from requirements granted under this section are conditioned on compliance with the procedures, conditions, and limitations set forth in the approval of the application. Failure to comply in good faith with such procedures, conditions, and limitations will automatically terminate the authority for such variations, and the manufacturer of processed tobacco thereupon must fully comply with the prescribed requirements of the regulations from which the variations were authorized. Authority for any variation may be withdrawn whenever in the judgment of the appropriate TTB officer the effective administration of this subpart is hindered by the continuation of such variation. Where a manufacturer desires to employ such variation, the manufacturer must submit a written application to do so to the appropriate TTB officer. The application must describe the proposed variations and set forth the reasons therefor. Variations may not be employed until the application has been approved. Any authorization of the appropriate TTB officer under this section shall be retained as part of the manufacturer's records, in accordance with this subpart.
[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 71 (Wednesday, April 13, 2011)]
[Notices]
[Pages 20655-20656]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2011-8766]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket No. EL11-32-000]


American Electric Power Service Corporation v. PJM 
Interconnection, L.L.C.; Notice of Complaint

    Take notice that on April 4, 2011, pursuant to Rule 206 of the 
Rules of Practice and Procedure of the Federal Energy Regulatory 
Commission (Commission), 18 CFR 385.206 (2010) and section 206 of the 
Federal Power Act (FPA), 16 U.S.C. 824e (2006), American Electric Power 
Service Corporation (Complainant) filed a formal complaint against PJM 
Interconnection, L.L.C. (Respondent), alleging that Schedule 8.1, 
section D.8 to the PJM Interconnection, L.L.C. Reliability Assurance 
Agreement is unjust, unreasonable, and unduly discriminatory.
    Complainant certifies that copies of the complaint were served on 
representatives of the Respondent.
    Any person desiring to intervene or to protest this filing must 
file in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the Commission's Rules of 
Practice and Procedure (18 CFR 385.211, 385.214). Protests will be 
considered by the Commission in determining the appropriate action to 
be taken, but will not serve to make protestants parties to the 
proceeding. Any person wishing to become a party must file a notice of 
intervention or motion to intervene, as appropriate. The Respondent's 
answer and all interventions, or protests must be filed on or before 
the comment date. The Respondent's answer, motions to intervene, and 
protests must be served on the Complainants.

[[Page 20656]]

    The Commission encourages electronic submission of protests and 
interventions in lieu of paper using the ``eFiling'' link at http://www.ferc.gov. Persons unable to file electronically should submit an 
original and 14 copies of the protest or intervention to the Federal 
Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE., Washington, DC 
20426.
    This filing is accessible on-line at http://www.ferc.gov, using the 
``eLibrary'' link and is available for review in the Commission's 
Public Reference Room in Washington, DC. There is an ``eSubscription'' 
link on the Web site that enables subscribers to receive e-mail 
notification when a document is added to a subscribed docket(s). For 
assistance with any FERC Online service, please e-mail 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#2b6d6e796864454742454e785e5b5b44595f6b4d4e5948054c445d"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="bafcffe8f9f5d4d6d3d4dfe9cfcacad5c8cefadcdfc8d994ddd5cc">[email protected]</span></a>, or call (866) 208-3676 (toll free). For 
TTY, call (202) 502-8659.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on April 25, 2011.

    Dated: April 5, 2011.
Kimberly D. Bose,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2011-8766 Filed 4-12-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
###### Editorial Note on Part 40

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 40 appear by T.D. ATF-460, 66 FR 39094-39096, July 27, 2001; T.D. ATF-464, 66 FR 43479, Aug. 20, 2001; and T.D. TTB-91, 76 FR 5479, Feb. 1, 2011.

#### § 40.286 Refund of overpayment.

Where an error in computation of the quantity of tobacco products or in computation of the amount of tax due results in an overpayment and such error is specifically identified and supported by records, the manufacturer may file claim for refund or may make an adjustment in his semimonthly tax return as provided in § 40.164. (Section 6511, 26 U.S.C., provides that, in most cases, any adjustment of claim for refund of an overpayment of tax on tobacco products must be made or filed within three years after the tax is paid.) If the manufacturer elects to file a claim for refund of an overpayment resulting from such a computational error, he shall do so on TTB F 5620.8, in duplicate. The original shall be filed with the appropriate TTB officer, and the duplicate retained by the manufacturer. Where an overpayment of tax on tobacco products results from other than a computational error any claim for refund or credit shall be made in accordance with subpart A of part 46 of this chapter.

(68A Stat. 791, 72 Stat. 9; 26 U.S.C. 6402, 6423)

[T.D. 6871, 31 FR 39, Jan. 4, 1966. Redesignated at 40 FR 16835, Apr. 15, 1975, and amended by T.D. ATF-48, 44 FR 55855, Sept. 28, 1979; T.D. ATF-232, 51 FR 28083, Aug. 5, 1986; T.D. ATF-243, 51 FR 43194, Dec. 1, 1986; T.D. ATF-251, 52 FR 19340, May 22, 1987; T.D. ATF-457, 66 FR 32220, June 14, 2001]
Editorial Note on Part 45
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 45 appear by T.D. ATF-460, 66 FR 39093, July 27, 2001.

§ 45.45a Notice for pipe tobacco. ( a ) *Product designation.* Every package of pipe tobacco shall, before removal subject to tax, have adequately imprinted thereon, or on a label securely affixed thereto, the designation “pipe tobacco.”
( b ) *Product weight.* Every package of pipe tobacco shall, before removal subject to tax, have adequately imprinted thereon, or on a label securely affixed thereto, a clear statement of the actual pounds and ounces of the product contained therein.
[T.D. ATF-289, 54 FR 48842, Nov. 27, 1989, as amended by T.D. TTB-78, 74 FR 29420, June 22, 2009]