[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 70 (Tuesday, April 12, 2011)]
[Notices]
[Pages 20366-20367]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2011-8597]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT

[Docket No. FR-5094-C-07]


Changes to the Public Housing Assessment System (PHAS): 
Management Operations Scoring Notice

AGENCY: Office of the Assistant Secretary for Public and Indian 
Housing, HUD.

ACTION: Notice; correction.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: HUD published a document in the Federal Register of February 
23, 2011, concerning request for public comments on the Management 
Operations interim scoring notice. The document inadvertently omitted a 
word with respect to the tenant accounts receivable metric.

DATES: Effective Date: March 25, 2011.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Claudia Yarus, Department of Housing 
and Urban Development, Office of Public and Indian Housing, Real Estate 
Assessment Center (REAC), 550 12th Street, SW., Suite 100, Washington, 
DC 20410 at 202-475-8830 (this is not a toll-free number). Persons with 
hearing or speech impairments may access this number through TTY by 
calling the toll-free Federal Information Relay Service at 800-877-
8339. Additional information is available from the REAC Internet site 
at http://www.hud.gov/offices/reac/.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

I. Background

    The proposed management operations scoring information was 
published on August 21, 2008 (73 FR 49575). This proposal included a 
metric for tenant rents collected, in which the highest score would 
have been given for a successful collection rate of 97 percent of the 
total rent due; the intermediate score would have been given for a 
successful collection rate of at least 93 percent but less than 97 
percent; and the lowest score would have been given for a collection 
rate of less than 93 percent. Stated in terms of accounts receivable, 
these 3 tiers of scoring would be: for the highest score, a 3 percent 
or .03 ratio of accounts receivable; for the intermediate score, at 
least 7 percent or .07 ratio of accounts receivable to less than a 3 
percent or .03 ratio of accounts receivable; and for the lowest score, 
less than a 7 percent or .07 ratio of accounts receivable.
    The interim Management Operations Scoring Notice was published on 
February 23, 2011 (76 FR 10050). This interim notice is effective as of 
March 25, 2011, and HUD is accepting public comments on this notice 
until April 25, 2011. In this interim notice, the same metric is stated 
as ``tenant accounts receivable'' and was intended to be adjusted 
slightly compared to the proposal.
    The interim notice states that ``A PHA will receive 5 points if it 
has a tenant accounts receivable ratio of less than 1.5. It will 
receive 2 points if it has a tenant accounts receivable ratio of equal 
to or greater than 1.5 and less than 2.5. It will receive zero points 
if it has a tenant accounts receivable ratio of equal to or greater 
than 2.5.'' (See 76 FR 10051, 3rd column). A chart immediately 
following this text restates the same figures. Both the paragraph and 
the chart inadvertently omitted the word ``percent'' following each of 
these ratios.
    Taken literally on a one-year basis, a tenant accounts receivable 
ratio of, for example, 1.5 would mean that one-and-one half times the 
amount of total tenant charges (rents and other charges to the tenants) 
by a housing authority would be uncollected, an obvious impossibility, 
or, alternatively, over a 2-year basis, a PHA had failed to collect 100 
percent of all tenant charges in a given year, and was still owed 50 
percent of all the tenant charges from a previous year, a performance 
so unlikely as to be virtually impossible, and one having no reasonable 
relation to the proposal.
    HUD submits that the language supports that it was not HUD's 
intention to give a high score in this metric to such a low-performing 
PHA even if one existed. What was meant was that 1.5 percent (or .015) 
of the tenant charges would be uncollected. Stated in the terms that 
the proposed rule used, PHAS would require PHAs to collect 98.5 percent 
of the rents rather than 97

[[Page 20367]]

percent to receive the highest score, a reasonable adjustment from the 
proposal. This correction properly conforms the language to the clearly 
intended meaning.

II. Correction

    In the Federal Register of February 23, 2011, in FR Doc. 2011-2658, 
on page 10051, in the third column, the second full paragraph 
(beginning ``A PHA will receive 5 points if * * * '') and the 
subsequent chart should be corrected to add the word ``percent'' after 
the figures ``1.5'' and ``2.5'' wherever those figures occur, to read 
as follows:
    A PHA will receive 5 points if it has a tenant accounts receivable 
ratio of less than 1.5 percent. It will receive 2 points if it has a 
tenant accounts receivable ratio of equal to or greater than 1.5 
percent and less than 2.5 percent. It will receive zero points if it 
has a tenant accounts receivable ratio of equal to or greater than 2.5 
percent.

------------------------------------------------------------------------
               Tenant accounts receivable value                  Points
------------------------------------------------------------------------
<1.5 percent.................................................          5
>=1.5 percent but <2.5 percent...............................          2
>=2.5 percent................................................          0
------------------------------------------------------------------------


    Dated: April 5, 2011.
Sandra B. Henriquez,
Assistant Secretary for Public and Indian Housing.
[FR Doc. 2011-8597 Filed 4-11-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4210-67-P