alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
AFS-16-12336-E

September 9, 2016

 Exemption No. 131N

 Regulatory Docket No. FAA-2001-9519

Maj. Matthew J. Niendorf

Chief, Flight Directives Division

Department of the Air Force

6500 South MacArthur Boulevard

Oklahoma City, OK 73169

Dear Maj. Niendorf:

This letter is to inform you that we have granted your petition to extend Exemption No. 131, 

as amended. It explains the basis for our decision and describes its effect, and lists the 

conditions and limitations.

The Basis for Our Decision

By letter dated June 9, 2016, you petitioned the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) on 

behalf of the U.S. Air Force (USAF) for an extension of Exemption No. 131, as amended. 

That exemption from § 91.159 of Title 14, Code of Federal Regulations allows the USAF to 

conduct its hurricane reconnaissance flights without maintaining the appropriate cruising 

altitudes as prescribed by § 91.159.

In your petition, you indicate that there has been no change in the conditions and reasons 

relative to public interest and safety that were the basis for granting the original exemption.

The FAA has determined that good cause exists for not publishing a summary of the petition 

in the Federal Register because the requested extension of the exemption would not set a 

precedent, and any delay in acting on this petition would be detrimental to the USAF.
2

Our Decision

The FAA has determined that the justification for the issuance of Exemption No. 131, as 

amended, remains valid with respect to this exemption and is in the public interest. Therefore, 

under the authority provided by 49 U.S.C. § 106(f), 40113, 44701, which the FAA 

Administrator has delegated to me, I grant the U.S. Air Force (USAF) an exemption from 14 

CFR § 91.159 to the extent necessary to allow the USAF to conduct its hurricane 

reconnaissance flights without maintaining the appropriate cruising altitudes as prescribed by 

§ 91.159, subject to the conditions and limiations described below.

Conditions and Limitations 

1. The pilot of any USAF aircraft engaged in the operations allowed by this exemption is 

not relieved of the responsibility to see and avoid other aircraft as required by other 

provisions of the regulations.

The Effect of Our Decision

Our decision extends the termination date of Exemption No. 131, as amended, to

September 30, 2018, unless sooner superseded or rescinded. 

Sincerely,

/s/

John Barbagallo

Deputy Director, Flight Standards Service
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
 Washington, D.C. 20549
 FORM 8-K
 CURRENT REPORT
Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
 Date of Report (Date of earliest event reported): June 23, 2011
 Western Liberty Bancorp
  Delaware
    
    001-33803
    
    26-0469120(State or other Jurisdiction of Incorporation)
    
    (Commission File Number)
    
    (IRS Employer Identification No.)
 8363 W. Sunset Road, Suite 350Las Vegas, Nevada
    
    89113(Address of Principal Executive Offices)
    
    (Zip Code)
 (702) 966-7400
 (Former name or former address if changed since last report.)
  o
    
    Written communications pursuant to Rule 425 under the Securities Act (17 CFR 230.425)o
    
    Soliciting material pursuant to Rule 14a-12 under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.14a-12)o
    
    Pre-commencement communications pursuant to Rule 14d-2(b) under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.14d-2(b))o
    
    Pre-commencement communications pursuant to Rule 13e-4(c) under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.13e-4(c))




---



##### 



ITEM 5.07
    
    Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders
   First Proposal. Election of Directors
  Votes
    
    BrokerNominee
    
    Votes For
    
    Withheld
    
    Non-VotesJason N. Ader
    
    
    6,413,930
    
    
    
    2,153,412
    
    
    
    537,281Curtis W. Anderson
    
    
    5,419,559
    
    
    
    3,147,783
    
    
    
    537,281Richard A.C. Coles
    
    
    5,855,091
    
    
    
    2,712,251
    
    
    
    537,281Michael B. Frankel
    
    
    8,504,645
    
    
    
    62,697
    
    
    
    537,281Robert G. Goldstein
    
    
    6,622,091
    
    
    
    1,945,251
    
    
    
    537,281Steven D. Hill
    
    
    5,414,800
    
    
    
    3,152,542
    
    
    
    537,281William E. Martin
    
    
    8,043,556
    
    
    
    523,786
    
    
    
    537,281Terrence L. Wright
    
    
    4,219,331
    
    
    
    4,348,011
    
    
    
    537,281
 Second Proposal. Ratification of the selection of Crowe Horwath LLP as independent auditor
  BrokerFor
    
    Against
    
    Abstentions
    
    Non-Votes7,171,677
    
    
    1,882,148
    
    
    
    50,798
    
    
    
    0
 
 ITEM 8.01
    
    Other Events




---



##### 



SIGNATURES
  WESTERN LIBERTY BANCORPDate: June 27, 2011
    
    By:
Name:
    
    /s/ George A. Rosenbaum, Jr.

George A. Rosenbaum, Jr.Title:
    
    Chief Financial Officer
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY ELEV

 122.50

 122.43

 122.34

 122.14

 122.68

 122.23

 121.65

 123.74

 123.46

 123.70

 123.16

 122.98

 122.65

 122.82

 123.87

 124.15

 123.89

 123.43

 123.54

 123.08

 123.02

 122.98

 123.05

 122.97

 122.46

 124.17

 124.31

 124.10

 123.86

 123.41

 122.10

 7,566

 7,535

 7,494

 7,404

 7,647

 7,445

 7,194

 8,139

 8,007

 8,120

 7,866

 7,782

 7,634

 7,710

 8,200

 8,336

 8,209

 7,993

 8,045

 7,829

 7,800

 7,782

 7,815

 7,778

 7,548

 8,346

 8,416

 8,311

 8,195

 7,984

 7,386

STORAGE

+67

-31

-41

-90

+243

-202

-251

+945

-132

+113

-254

-84

-148

+76

+490

+136

-127

-216

+52

-216

-29

-18

+33

-37

-230

+798

+70

-105

-116

-211

-598

CHANGE

15,425

15,373

15,319

15,292

15,159

13,076

11,303

10,315

8,887

9,022

8,410

8,214

8,193

8,313

8,532

8,326

8,826

8,988

9,175

9,110

9,164

9,180

9,210

9,062

7,797

7,418

6,328

6,230

6,247

6,201

6,069

INFLOW

 2,533

 2,009

 2,007

 3,154

 4,891

 4,851

 4,901

 4,721

 4,668

 4,683

 3,636

 4,591

 4,614

 4,641

 4,569

 4,485

 4,437

 3,770

 4,503

 4,474

 4,459

 4,477

 4,479

 4,477

 4,476

 4,470

 4,487

 4,485

 4,495

 4,501

 4,571

POWER

 12,744

 13,252

 13,208

 12,070

 10,057

 8,236

 6,425

 5,005

 4,173

 4,169

 4,789

 3,552

 3,536

 3,511

 3,583

 3,652

 4,341

 5,213

 4,533

 4,629

 4,601

 4,593

 4,595

 4,484

 3,336

 2,458

 1,719

 1,710

 1,706

 1,707

 1,694

SPILL

 85

 85

 85

 85

 85

 85

 85

 85

 85

 85

 85

 85

 85

 85

 85

 85

 85

 85

 85

 85

 85

 85

 85

 85

 85

 85

 85

 85

 85

 66

 58

HATCHERY

 4

 3

 2

 4

 3

 2

 2

 3

 3

 3

 3

 3

 3

 3

 3

 1

 2

 4

 3

 3

 4

 4

 4

 5

 3

 3

 2

 3

 3

 3

 2

C.F.S.

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

MAY 2017 LAKE NATOMA DAILY OPERATIONS RUN DATE: June 1, 2017

IN LAKE

EVAP

C.F.S.

COMPUTED*

ACRE-FEET

RELEASE - C.F.S.

TOTALS -113 298,164 131,515 163,281 2,589 93

ACRE-FEET -113 591,408 260,860 323,868 5,135 184

COMMENTS:

* COMPUTED INFLOW IS THE SUM OF CHANGE IN STORAGE, RELEASES AND EVAPORATION.

SUMMARY

RELEASES (ACRE-FEET)

POWER 260,860

SPILL 323,868

FOLSOM SOUTH CANAL

HATCHERY

 1,476

 5,135

 7,499

FOLSOM

SOUTH 

CANAL

 25

 40

 38

 24

 0

 4

 17

 25

 25

 25

 25

 25

 30

 35

 45

 34

 25

 25

 25

 28

 30

 30

 30

 30

 13

 0

 0

 0

 16

 30

 45

 744

 1,476

(1)

(1) INCHES OF EVAPORATION TAKEN FROM FOLSOM PAN.

RELEASES (ACRE-FEET)

TOTAL 591,339
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
 Washington, D.C. 20549
 FORM 8-K
 CURRENT REPORT
Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
 Date of Report

July 6, 2011  (Date of earliest event reported)
 Torch Energy Royalty Trust
 (Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
 Delaware(State or other jurisdiction of 
incorporation or organization)
    
    1-12474(Commission File Number)
    
    74-6411424(I.R.S. Employer
Identification Number)
 Rodney Square North

1100 North Market Street

Wilmington, Delaware 19890  (Address of principal executive offices, including zip code)
 302/636-6016  (Registrants telephone number, including area code)
  o
    
    Written communications pursuant to Rule 425 under the Securities Act (17 CFR 230.425)
 o
    
    Soliciting material pursuant to Rule 14a-12 under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.14a-12)
 o
    
    Pre-commencement communications pursuant to Rule 14d-2(b) under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.14d-2(b))
 o
    
    Pre-commencement communications pursuant to Rule 13e-4(c) under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.13e-4(c))




---



##### 



Item 8.01
    
    Other Events.
     Item 9.01
    
    Financial Statements and Exhibits.
 (d)
    
    Exhibits
 Exhibit 99.1
    
    Torch Energy Royalty Trust Press Release dated July 6, 2011.




---



##### 



SIGNATURES
  TORCH ENERGY ROYALTY TRUSTBy:
    Wilmington Trust Company, not in itsindividual capacity but solely as Trustee forthe TrustDate: July 6, 2011
    By:
    /s/ Bruce L. BissonBruce L. Bisson,Vice President
(The Trust has no employees, directors or
executive officers.)




---



##### 



EXHIBIT INDEX
 Exhibit No.
    
    DescriptionExhibit 99.1
    
    Torch Energy Royalty Trust Press Release dated July 6, 2011.
Exhibit 4.17
                                NOTE
                                                         New York, New York
$53,000,000.00                                            December 22, 1997


     
     FOR VALUE RECEIVED, THE INTERLAKE CORPORATION, a Delaware corporation
(the "Borrower"), hereby promises to pay to the order of THE FIRST
NATIONAL BANK OF CHICAGO (the "Bank"), in lawful money of the United
States of America in immediately available funds, at the office of The
Chase Manhattan Bank (the "Administrative Agent") located at 270 Park
Avenue, New York, New York 10017 on the Maturity Date (as defined in the
Second Amended and Restated Credit Agreement referred to below) the
principal sum of FIFTY-THREE MILLION DOLLARS or, if less, the unpaid
principal amount of all Loans (as defined in the Second Amended and
Restated Credit Agreement) made by the Bank pursuant to the Second Amended
and Restated Credit Agreement.

     The Borrower promises also to pay interest on the unpaid principal
amount of each Loan in like money at said office from the date such Loan
is made until paid at the rates and at the times provided in Section 1.08
of the Second Amended and Restated Credit Agreement.

     This Note is one of the Notes referred to in the Second Amended and
Restated Credit Agreement, dated as of September 27, 1989 and amended and
restated as of December 22, 1997, among the Borrower, the financial
institutions named therein (including the Bank), the Administrative Agent
and the Document Agent (as so amended and restated and as the same may
hereafter be amended, modified or supplemented from time to time, the
"Second Amended and Restated Credit Agreement") and is entitled to the
benefits thereof.  This Note is issued in replacement of the Notes as
defined in and issued pursuant to the Original Credit Agreement (as
defined in the Second Amended and Restated Credit Agreement).  This Note
is guaranteed pursuant to the Subsidiary Guaranties and is secured by
certain Security Documents (as defined in the Second Amended and Restated
Credit Agreement).  As provided in the Second Amended and Restated Credit
Agreement, this Note is subject to voluntary and mandatory prepayment
prior to the Maturity Date, in whole or in part.

     In case an Event of Default (as defined in the Second Amended and
Restated Credit Agreement) shall occur and be continuing, the principal of
and accrued interest on this Note may be declared to be due and payable in
the manner and with the effect provided in the Second Amended and Restated
Credit Agreement.

     The Borrower hereby waives presentment, demand, protest or notice of
any kind in connection with this Note.


     THIS NOTE SHALL BE CONSTRUED IN ACCORDANCE WITH AND BE GOVERNED BY
THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK.
                                THE INTERLAKE CORPORATION


                                By:                                        
                                   Name:                                
                                   Title:
### M A N D A T E

TO THE 94TH DISTRICT COURT of NUECES COUNTY, GREET INGS:

Before our Court of Appeals for the Thirteenth District of Texas, on the 7th day of August, 2014 , the cause upon appeal to revise or reverse your judgment between

GUADALUPE GARCIA, Appella nt,

v.

THE STATE OF TEXAS Appellee.

CAUSE NO. 13

- 13

- 00653

- CR (Tr.Ct.No. 13CR2039

- C)

was determined; and therein our said Court made its order in these words:

JUDGMENT

THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS, having considered this cause on

appeal, concludes that the judgment of the trial court should be AFFIRMED. The Court

orders the judgment of the trial court AFFIRMED.

We further order this decision certified below for observance.

August 7 , 2014.



WHEREFORE, WE COMMAND YOU to observe the order of our said Court of Appeals for the Thirteenth District of Texas, in this behalf, and in all things have it duly recognized, obeyed and executed.

WITNESS, the Hon. Rogelio Valdez, Chief Justice of our Court of Appeals, with the seal thereof affixed, at the City of Edinbu rg, Texas this 30th day of January, 2015.

Dorian E. Ramirez, CLERK
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 01-2495
LEONARD A. LYLES, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus GEORGE BALOG, Commissioner, Defendant - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. Marvin J. Garbis, District Judge. (CA-99- 3084-MJG) Submitted: April 29, 2002 Decided: June 3, 2002 Before WIDENER, TRAXLER, and KING, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Leonard A. Lyles, Appellant Pro Se. Allyson Murphy Huey, OFFICE OF THE CITY SOLICITOR, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: Leonard A. Lyles appeals the district court’s order granting summary judgment in favor of Appellees on his religious discrimination claims. We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Lyles v. Balog , No. CA-99-3084-MJG (D. Md. Nov. 8, 2001). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
<PAGE>   1




                                                Exhibit 11


<TABLE>
<CAPTION>

               AMPAL-AMERICAN ISRAEL CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
               --------------------------------------------------
    SCHEDULE SETTING FORTH COMPUTATION OF EARNINGS PER SHARE OF CLASS A STOCK
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------



NINE MONTHS ENDED SEPTEMBER 30,                             1999                   1998
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(Amounts in thousands, except                            (Unaudited)            (Unaudited)
  per share data)

<S>                                                         <C>                   <C>
Weighted average number of shares
  outstanding:
    4% Preferred........................................       168                     178
    6-1/2% Preferred....................................       865                     948
    Class A.............................................    21,773                  23,885
                                                            ======                ========


BASIC EPS
 Net income (loss)......................................   $23,650                $   (815)
                                                           =======                ========

 Earnings (loss) per Class A share:
  Earnings from continuing operations...................  $   1.20                $    .02
  (Loss) from discontinued operations...................      (.12)                   (.05)
                                                          --------                --------
 Earnings (loss) per Class A share......................  $   1.08                $   (.03)
                                                          ========                ========

 Weighted average number of Class A
  shares outstanding....................................    21,772                  23,885


DILUTED EPS
 Net income (loss)......................................  $ 23,650                $(1,086)(1)
                                                          ========                ========

 Earnings (loss) per Class A share:
  Earnings from continuing operations...................  $   1.04                $    .01
  (Loss) from discontinued operations...................      (.10)                   (.05)
                                                          --------                --------
 Earnings (loss) per Class A share......................  $    .94                $   (.04)
                                                          ========                ========

 Weighted average number of Class A
  shares outstanding assuming
  conversion of preferred stock
  into Class A shares...................................    25,208                  27,616

</TABLE>


(1)  Includes decrease in net income of $271 due to dilution in equity in
     earnings of affiliate.


                                       21
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

DAY HIGH

 526

 680

 777

 670

 607

 557

 517

 450

 466

 458

 465

 544

 614

 653

 659

 685

 739

 601

 648

 562

 572

 584

 511

 547

 588

 672

 786

 850

 995

 1,217

 367

 372

 380

 377

 372

 373

 377

 373

 371

 368

 369

 373

 374

 378

 380

 376

 381

 372

 366

 361

 360

 364

 363

 364

 370

 377

 382

 371

 365

 414

 404

 436

 465

 444

 432

 421

 417

 396

 402

 396

 401

 421

 434

 438

 444

 464

 474

 433

 455

 436

 425

 425

 402

 418

 434

 454

 476

 476

 517

 594

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

APRIL 2021 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: May 5, 2021

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

14 DAY

ACCUM

MEAN

14 DAY 

AVG

MEAN

 5,638

 5,638

 5,663

 5,680

 5,698

 5,709

 5,736

 5,735

 5,751

 5,763

 5,783

 5,818

 5,859

 5,907

 5,947

 5,975

 5,984

 5,973

 5,996

 6,011

 6,019

 6,048

 6,048

 6,070

 6,103

 6,136

 6,178

 6,216

 6,289

 6,419

 403

 403

 405

 406

 407

 408

 410

 410

 411

 412

 413

 416

 419

 422

 425

 427

 427

 427

 428

 429

 430

 432

 432

 434

 436

 438

 441

 444

 449

 459

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

JERSEY POINT TOP ON THE SAN JOAQUIN RIVER
* Pursuant to Local Rule 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in Local Rule 47.5.4. IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 96-50470 Summary Calendar

JOHN WILLIAM WINSLOW, Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus BOB OWENS, Texas Board of Pardons and Paroles, Defendant-Appellee.

- - - - - - - - - - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas USDC No. A-95-CV-783

- - - - - - - - - - October 9, 1996 Before DAVIS, EMILIO M. GARZA and STEWART, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: * John William Winslow appeals the dismissal of his suit as frivolous. Winslow contends that he has a liberty interest in the applicable parole procedures and that the district court erred in denying his request that it convene a three-judge panel to consider his constitutional claims. We have reviewed the record and Winslow’s brief and AFFIRM the district court’sNo. 96-50470 - 2 - dismissal for essentially the same reasons adopted by the district court. Winslow v. Owens , A-95-CV-783 (W.D. Tex. May 30, 1996). AFFIRMED.
Exhibit 8.1

                          SIGNIFICANT SUBSIDIARIES


         The following is a list of all of Koor's significant subsidiaries,
including the name, country of incorporation or residence, proportion of
ownership interest and, if different, proportion of voting power held.

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>

                                                     Country of        Percentage of     Percentage of voting
                                                  Incorporation          ownership        power (if different
Name of Subsidiary                                  or residence          interest           from ownership)
-----------------------------------------         --------------       -------------     ---------------------
<S>                                                  <C>                  <C>                   <C>
Koor Corporate Venture Capital                         Israel              100%                    *
Elisra Electronic Systems Ltd.                         Israel              100%                    *
Makhteshim-Agan Industries Ltd.                        Israel              58.9%                   *
ECI Telecom Ltd.                                       Israel             34.96%                   *
Telrad Networks Ltd.                                   Israel              100%                    *
Sheraton Moriah (Israel) Hotels Ltd.                   Israel              55.0%                   *
Knafaim Arkia Holdings Ltd.                            Israel              28.1%                   *
Koor Trade Ltd.                                        Israel              100%                    *

</TABLE>