alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
### §1916. Administration of financial assistance; recording of mortgages

#### (a) Guarantees, agreements for deferred participation, and loans

In making and administering guarantees, agreements for deferred participation, and loans under section 1914 1 of this title, the Secretary of Commerce may—

(1) require security for any such guarantee, agreement, or loan, and enforce, waive, or subordinate such security;

(2) assign or sell at public or private sale, or otherwise dispose of, upon such terms and conditions and for such consideration as he shall determine to be reasonable, any evidence of debt, contract, claim, personal property, or security assigned to or held by him in connection with such guarantees, agreements, or loans, and collect, compromise, and obtain deficiency judgments with respect to all obligations assigned to or held by him in connection with such guarantees, agreements, or loans until such time as such obligations may be referred to the Attorney General for suit or collection;

(3) renovate, improve, modernize, complete, insure, rent, sell, or otherwise deal with, upon such terms and conditions and for such consideration as he shall determine to be reasonable, any real or personal property conveyed to or otherwise acquired by him in connection with such guarantees, agreements, or loans;

(4) acquire, hold, transfer, release, or convey any real or personal property or any interest therein whenever deemed necessary or appropriate, and execute all legal documents for such purposes; and

(5) exercise all such other powers and take all such other acts as may be necessary or incidental to the carrying out of functions pursuant to section 1914 of this title.

#### (b) Mortgages

Any mortgage acquired as security under subsection (a) shall be recorded under applicable State law.

(Pub. L. 87–794, title III, §316, Oct. 11, 1962, 76 Stat. 888.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

Section 1914 of this title, referred to in subsec. (a), was repealed by Pub. L. 93–618, title VI, §602(e), Jan. 3, 1975, 88 Stat. 2072.

1 See References in Text note below.
###### Editorial Note on Part 30

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 30 appear by T.D. ATF-438, 66 FR 5481, Jan. 19, 2001.

#### § 30.62 Table 2, showing wine gallons and proof gallons by weight.

The wine and proof gallon content by weight and proof of packages of distilled spirits usually found in actual practice will be ascertained from this table. The left-hand column contains the weights. The true percent of proof is shown on the heading of each page in a range from 90 degrees to 200 degrees. Under the true percent of proof and on the same horizontal line with the weight will be found the wine gallons (at 60 degrees Fahrenheit) and the proof gallons respectively. Where either the weight or the proof of a quantity of spirits is beyond the limitations of this table, the number of proof gallons may be ascertained by reference to Table 3. This table may also be used to ascertain the wine gallons (at 60 degrees Fahrenheit) and proof gallons of spirituous liquor containing dissolved solids where the weight, apparent proof (hydrometer indication corrected to 60 degrees Fahrenheit), and obscuration factor have been determined.

# Example.

334 lbs. of distilled spirits.

Apparent proof—96.0°.

Obscuration—0.8°.

True Proof 96.0° + 0.8° = 96.8°.

334 lbs. at 96.0° apparent proof = 42.8 wine gallons.

42.8 wine gallons × 96.8° = 41.4 proof gallons.

In addition this table may be used to obtain the wine gallons, at the prevailing temperature, of most liquids within the range of the table, from the weight of the liquid and the uncorrected reading of the hydrometer stem. An application of this would be in determining the capacity of a package.

# Example.

It is desired to determine, or to check the rated capacity of a package having a net weight of 395 pounds when completely filled with spirits having an uncorrected hydrometer reading of 113.0°. The full capacity of the package, 51.5 wine gallons, would be found by referring to the table at 395 pounds and 113° proof (hydrometer reading).

(Sec. 201, Pub. L. 85-859, 72 Stat. 1358, as amended, 1362, as amended (26 U.S.C. 5204, 5211))
Editorial Note on Part 478
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 478 appear by T.D. ATF-411, 64 FR 17291, Apr. 9, 1999, T.D. ATF-487, 68 FR 3750, Jan. 24, 2003, and ATF-11F, 73 FR 57240, Oct. 2, 2008.

§ 478.141 General. With the exception of §§ 478.32(a)(9) and (d)(9) and 478.99(c)(9), the provisions of this part shall not apply with respect to: ( a ) The transportation, shipment, receipt, possession, or importation of any firearm or ammunition imported for, sold or shipped to, or issued for the use of, the United States or any department or agency thereof or any State or any department, agency, or political subdivision thereof.
( b ) The shipment or receipt of firearms or ammunition when sold or issued by the Secretary of the Army pursuant to section 4308 of Title 10, U.S.C., and the transportation of any such firearm or ammunition carried out to enable a person, who lawfully received such firearm or ammunition from the Secretary of the Army, to engage in military training or in competitions.
( c ) The shipment, unless otherwise prohibited by the Act or any other Federal law, by a licensed importer, licensed manufacturer, or licensed dealer to a member of the U.S. Armed Forces on active duty outside the United States or to clubs, recognized by the Department of Defense, whose entire membership is composed of such members of the U.S. Armed Forces, and such members or clubs may receive a firearm or ammunition determined by the Director to be generally recognized as particularly suitable for sporting purposes and intended for the personal use of such member or club. Before making a shipment of firearms or ammunition under the provisions of this paragraph, a licensed importer, licensed manufacturer, or licensed dealer may submit a written request, in duplicate, to the Director for a determination by the Director whether such shipment would constitute a violation of the Act or any other Federal law, or whether the firearm or ammunition is considered by the Director to be generally recognized as particularly suitable for sporting purposes.
( d ) The transportation, shipment, receipt, possession, or importation of any antique firearm.
[33 FR 18555, Dec. 14, 1968. Redesignated at 40 FR 10835, Apr. 15, 1975, and amended by T.D. ATF-241, 51 FR 39628, Oct. 29, 1986; T.D. ATF-270, 53 FR 10505, Mar. 31, 1988; T.D. ATF-313, 56 FR 32509, July 17, 1991; T.D. ATF-401, 63 FR 35523, June 30, 1998]
Editorial Note on Part 44
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 44 appear by T.D. ATF-464, 66 FR 43480, Aug. 20, 2001, and T.D. ATF-480, 67 FR 30801-30803, May 8, 2002.

§ 44.142 Records. ( a ) *In general.* Each export warehouse proprietor must keep in the warehouse complete and concise records that show the: ( 1 ) Number of containers;
( 2 ) Unit type (for example: cartons, cases);
( 3 ) Kinds of articles (for example: small cigarettes);
( 4 ) Name of manufacturer and brand; and
( 5 ) Quantity of tobacco products and cigarette papers and tubes, and any processed tobacco received, removed, transferred, destroyed, lost, or returned to manufacturers or to customs bonded warehouse proprietors.
( b ) *Other records; form and retention.* In addition to the records specified in paragraph (a) of this section, the export warehouse proprietor must retain a copy of each TTB F 5200.14 from a manufacturer, another export warehouse proprietor, or a customs warehouse proprietor, from whom tobacco products or cigarette papers or tubes were received, as well as a copy of each TTB F 5200.14 covering the tobacco products and cigarette papers and tubes removed from the warehouse. The entries for each day in the records maintained under this section must be made by the close of the business day following the day on which the transactions occur. No particular form of records is prescribed, but the information required must be readily ascertainable. The copies of TTB F 5200.14 and other records must be retained for 3 years following the close of the calendar year in which the shipments were received or removed and must be made available for inspection by any appropriate TTB officer upon request.
[78 FR 38574, June 27, 2013]
Editorial Note on Part 28
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 28 appear by T.D. ATF-477, 67 FR 18087 through 18090, Apr. 15, 2002.

§ 28.26 Entry of distilled spirits into customs bonded warehouses. ( a ) *Distilled spirits withdrawn without payment of tax.* ( 1 ) Bottled distilled spirits may, subject to this part, be withdrawn from bonded premises for transfer to customs bonded warehouses in which imported distilled spirits are permitted to be stored in bond for entry pending withdrawal as provided in § 28.27. Withdrawals from bonded premises under the provisions of this paragraph shall be treated as withdrawals for exportation under the provisions of 26 U.S.C. 5214(a)(4).
( 2 ) Distilled spirits may, subject to this part, be withdrawn from bonded premises for transfer (for the purpose of storage pending exportation) to any customs bonded warehouse from which distilled spirits may be exported. These withdrawals shall be treated as withdrawals for exportation under the provisions of 26 U.S.C. 5214(a)(9).
( b ) *Bottled distilled spirits eligible for export with benefit of drawback.* Bottled distilled spirits eligible for export with benefit of drawback may, subject to this part, be transferred to customs bonded warehouses in which imported distilled spirits are permitted to be stored, and entered pending withdrawal as provided in § 28.28, as if such spirits were for exportation.
( c ) *Time deemed exported.* For the purpose of this part, distilled spirits entered into a customs bonded warehouse as provided in this section shall be deemed exported at the time so entered.
(Sec. 201, Pub. L. 85-859, 72 Stat. 1362, as amended, 1381, 1382, (26 U.S.C. 5214); sec. 3, Pub. L. 91-659, 84 Stat. 1965, as amended (26 U.S.C. 5066, 5370, 5371; 26 U.S.C. 7805))
[T.D. 7112, 36 FR 8580, May 8, 1971. Redesignated at 40 FR 16835, Apr. 15, 1975, and amended by T.D. ATF-206, 50 FR 23956, June 7, 1985; T.D. TTB-8, 69 FR 3831, Jan. 27, 2004]
**OFFICE OF**  **‘ LPIEP**  **A7TORNEY GENERA&**  **OFrmnS AUSIIN** 

...

..:. tiond%6ldots and a3 liwt fu-2 1qp.l entitioo ollgible * all rospmt?tta baV% and to Clails t.hapwtedsn cf ~e%tuttwww ~~3nbythslTobsrrl Dqm&tInsurmt~ ccrp-aan.'

. Ebora awh le an?l'tlIe

roof of wnor gl &Sty am-is a &.tponZt

t4tLmt p uppour SrQm

t&i Imltc’ B

books, ~tboreeu0800 tlw8t OS it8 ld.@.ltto ia3 l.ttwrumo

- uwullt or AIt3lttllvitlwl 

### ewount. dnotlter lnntanoa OS sllab ri@zt, vl3ryololmly 6pwtm&ctt tQoattoa1oitb t&3 e8w0,S.e tho eew

03 one dq,msifor In trust tar another p8r6oncQ.3po ~QuttO* .
No. 19578.

#### Raul Leopoldo Cruz *v.*The People of the State of Colorado.

(401 P.2d 830)

Decided May 10, 1965.

*En Banc.*

Mr. Chief Justice Pringle

delivered the opinion of the Court.

Raul Leopoldo Cruz was convicted in 1959 of robbery and conspiracy to commit robbery, and was sentenced to the state penitentiary. Thereafter, he brought writ of error, pro se, to this Court. On February 6, 1962, the judgment was affirmed in *Cruz v. People,*149 Colo. 187, 368 P.2d 774.

*212In February of 1965, Cruz filed a petition for habeas corpus, contending that he had been denied counsel on appeal. In accordance with our practice since *Ruark v. Colorado,*378 U.S. 585, 84 S.Ct. 1935, 12 L.Ed.2d 1042, we denied the petition for habeas corpus, but ordered the trial court in the main case to appoint counsel for Cruz. Counsel was ordered to examine the entire record for the purpose of determining whether any reversible error occurred during the trial which was not presented to this Court on the former appeal; and, if such error did occur, to file a brief in support of his position. Counsel was further directed to examine the briefs and the opinion of the Court to determine if the matters were adequately presented to this Court; and if, in his opinion they were not, to file a brief supplemental to the pro se brief. In the event counsel found no additional points of error which could have been raised, and that the points raised in the original writ of error were adequately considered, we directed him to so report.

In response to our order that defendant be afforded counsel, the trial court appointed one Don B. Oliver, a highly competent and experienced lawyer with many years of experience in the trial of criminal cases. In a 7 page brief, supplemented by a 6 page appendix, listing and analyzing authorities, counsel reported to us that he examined the record, including the complete transcript of the evidence; the briefs, and the cases cited therein; and that he consulted each of the three attorneys who appeared in the trial of the case. His conclusion, after such study, is that all error or alleged error was adequately covered by the opinion of this Court and that there are no grounds of error other than those presented to this Court on the original writ of error and covered by the Court in its opinion. In his opinion, no further consideration of the points raised is required.

The matter having been presented to us in this light by the brief of the able and experienced lawyer appointed by the trial court, we now adhere to the deci*213sion as reported in *Cruz v. People, supra.*For the reasons which are discussed fully in *Stanmore v. People,*157 Colo. 207, 401 P.2d 829, decided by us this day, under the same circumstances as exist here, we decline to appoint other counsel in this case and we reaffirm our previous judgment in this matter.
#### William H. Rankin, Respondent, v. George L. Killion, as Treasurer of Democratic National Committee, Appellant.

Order unanimously affirmed, with $20 costs and disbursements. No opinion. Present — Peck, P. J., Glennon, Dore, Cohn and Van Voorhis, JJ. [190 Mise. 26.]
## R e q u e s t f

o r I n f o r m a t i o n

­ F A

A

­ 2 0 1 5

­ 2 1 1 7

9

­ A W A

­ A V S

­ 3 3 3 E x e m p t i o n s ( F A

A )

S e n t : T u e s d a y

, J u l y 2 8

, 2 0 1 5 8 : 1 4 A M

T o : j k n u d s e n @ a l g a t t o r n e y s

. c o m

D e a r M r

. K n u d s e n :

T h i s l e t t e r i s t o i n f o r m y o u t h a t t h e f

o l l o w i n g i n f

o r m a t i o n i s m i s s i n g f r o m y

o u r p e t i t i o n ( D o c k

e t N o

. F A A

­ 2 0 1 5

­ 2 1 1 7 )

. T h i s i n f o r m a t i o n i s n e c e s s a r y f

o r t h e F e d e r a l A v i a t i o n A d m i n i s t r a t i o n ( F A A ) t o p r o c e s s y o u r p e t i t i o n

.

P r o v i d e a c o p y o f t h e M o t i o n P i c t u r e a n d T e l e v i s i o n O p e r a t i o n s M a n u a l ( M P T O M ) w h i c h i s r e q u i r e d b y O r d e r

8 9 0 0

. 1

, V o l u m e 3

, C h a p t e r 8

, S e c t i o n 1

. I f y o u w i s h f o r u s t o p r o c e e d w i t h o u t t h i s m a n u a l a n d r e m o v e

c l o s e d

‐ s e t f i l m i n g f r o m y

o u r p r o p o s e d o p e r a t i o n p l e a s e i n f o r m o f u s o f y

o u r i n t e n t i o n b y t h e r e q u e s t e d

r e s p o n s e d a t e l i s t e d b e l o w

.

P l e a s e s u b m i t t h e a d d i t i o n a l i n f o r m a t i o n ( n o n

‐ p r o p r i e t a r y ) t o y o u r d o c k e t a t w w w

. r e g u l a t i o n s

. g o v a n d s u b m i t a n y

p r o p r i e t a r y i n f

o r m a t i o n t o t h e F A A H e a d q u a r t e r s o r e l e c t r o n i c a l l y v i a e m a i l t o 3 3 3 e x e m p t i o n s @ f a a

. g o v

. I f y

o u w a n t

u s t o p r o c e s s y

o u r r e q u e s t a n y f u r t h e r

, w e m u s t r e c e i v e t h e i n f o r m a t i o n d e s c r i b e d a b o v

e b y 8 / 1 1 / 1 5

. I f w e d o n o t

r e c e i v e t h e i n f o r m a t i o n

, w e w i l l c l o s e t h e d o c k e t w i t h o u t n o t i f

y i n g y o u f u r t h e r

.

I f y o u h a v e a n y q u e s t i o n s

, p l e a s e f

e e l f r e e t o c o n t a c t m e a t ( 2 0 2 ) 2 6 7

­ 4 2 6 4

.

S i n c e r e l y

,

D a n N g o

F A A O f f i c e o f R u l e m a k i n g
###### Editorial Note on Part 40

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 40 appear by T.D. ATF-460, 66 FR 39094-39096, July 27, 2001; T.D. ATF-464, 66 FR 43479, Aug. 20, 2001; and T.D. TTB-91, 76 FR 5479, Feb. 1, 2011.

#### § 40.285 [Reserved]
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

DAY ELEV

 122.86

 123.00

 122.35

 122.18

 122.15

 122.29

 123.67

 123.65

 123.41

 124.68

 124.14

 124.02

 123.43

 122.13

 122.11

 122.24

 122.30

 122.43

 122.07

 122.32

 122.11

 122.24

 122.17

 122.65

 123.32

 124.13

 123.46

 123.55

 7,728

 7,791

 7,499

 7,422

 7,409

 7,472

 8,106

 8,097

 7,984

 8,601

 8,331

 8,271

 7,993

 7,400

 7,391

 7,449

 7,476

 7,535

 7,373

 7,485

 7,391

 7,449

 7,418

 7,634

 7,941

 8,326

 8,007

 8,050

STORAGE

+252

+63

-292

-77

-13

+63

+634

-9

-113

+617

-270

-60

-278

-593

-9

+58

+27

+59

-162

+112

-94

+58

-31

+216

+307

+385

-319

+43

CHANGE

1,915

1,826

1,637

1,746

1,781

1,813

2,106

1,792

1,731

2,104

1,623

1,578

1,704

1,551

1,798

1,814

1,808

1,843

1,732

1,873

1,779

1,846

1,789

1,901

1,953

1,998

1,638

1,821

INFLOW

 1,677

 1,684

 1,673

 1,674

 1,677

 1,670

 1,671

 1,686

 1,678

 1,688

 1,698

 596

 267

 268

 274

 282

 282

 281

 278

 276

 275

 276

 1,102

 1,690

 1,692

 1,699

 1,693

 1,693

POWER

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 4

 0

 0

 0

 0

 943

 1,482

 1,487

 1,442

 1,442

 1,442

 1,446

 1,446

 1,440

 1,450

 1,440

 603

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

SPILL

 60

 60

 60

 60

 60

 60

 60

 60

 60

 60

 60

 60

 60

 60

 60

 60

 60

 60

 60

 60

 60

 60

 60

 60

 60

 60

 60

 60

HATCHERY

 1

 0

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 0

 0

 0

 1

 0

 0

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 0

 1

 1

 0

 1

 1

C.F.S.

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

FEBRUARY 2007 LAKE NATOMA DAILY OPERATIONS RUN DATE: May 16, 2007

IN LAKE

EVAP

C.F.S.

COMPUTED*

ACRE-FEET

RELEASE - C.F.S.

TOTALS +574 50,500 31,400 16,067 1,680 20

ACRE-FEET +574 100,167 62,282 31,869 3,332 40

COMMENTS:

* COMPUTED INFLOW IS THE SUM OF CHANGE IN STORAGE, RELEASES AND EVAPORATION.

SUMMARY

RELEASES (ACRE-FEET)

POWER 62,282

SPILL 31,869

FOLSOM SOUTH CANAL

HATCHERY

 2,071

 3,332

 7,476

FOLSOM

SOUTH 

 50

 50

 50

 50

 50

 50

 50

 50

 50

 45

 1

 8

 35

 35

 26

 0

 9

 25

 29

 40

 40

 40

 40

 41

 45

 45

 45

 45

 1,044

 2,071

(1)

(1) INCHES OF EVAPORATION TAKEN FROM FOLSOM PAN.

RELEASES (ACRE-FEET) 

TOTAL 99,554

Table 12
(No. 6606

#### Charles Fisher, Claimant, *vs.*State of Illinois, Industrial Commission, Respondent.

*175
      *Opinion filed January 9, 1973.*

Sudak, Grubman, Rosenthal & Feldman, Attorney for Claimant.

William J. Scott, Attorney General; Saul R. Wexler, Assistant Attorney General, for Respondent.

Per Curiam.
Exhibit 32.2

Certification  pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley act of 2001.

      --------------------------------------------------------------------


In  connection  with the Annual  Report of Coach  Industries  Group,  Inc.  (the
"Company")  on Form 10-KSB for the year ended  December 31, 2003,  as filed with
the Securities  and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the  "Report"),  I,
Francis O'Donnell, Chief Accounting Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to
18 U.S.C.  1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2001, that:

The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

The  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all  material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Dated:  March 25, 2004


                                /s/ Francis O'Donnell
                                -------------------------------------------
                                Francis O'Donnell, Chief Accounting Officer
```

[Congressional Bills 116th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 5418 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

116th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 5418

 To require executive agencies to reduce cost-sharing requirements for 
certain grants with certain nonprofit organizations 25 percent, and for 
                            other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           December 12, 2019

  Miss Gonzalez-Colon of Puerto Rico (for herself, Ms. Velazquez, Mr. 
 Sablan, Mrs. Radewagen, Ms. Plaskett, Mr. San Nicolas, and Mr. Soto) 
 introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on 
                          Oversight and Reform

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To require executive agencies to reduce cost-sharing requirements for 
certain grants with certain nonprofit organizations 25 percent, and for 
                            other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Empowering Nonprofits Act''.

SEC. 2. REDUCTION OF COST-SHARING REQUIREMENTS FOR GRANTS.

    (a) Reduction of Cost-sharing Requirement.--Beginning on the date 
of the enactment of this Act and ending 5 years thereafter, the head of 
an executive agency shall reduce any cost-sharing requirement 25 
percent for an eligible nonprofit organization for grants made directly 
to that organization.
    (b) Definitions.--In this section:
            (1) Eligible nonprofit organization.--The term ``eligible 
        nonprofit organization'' means a nonprofit organization that is 
        located in a State with more than 20 percent of individuals 
        living below the Federal poverty line.
            (2) Executive agency.--The term ``executive agency'' has 
        the meaning given in section 133 of title 41, United States 
        Code.
            (3) Nonprofit organization.--The term ``nonprofit 
        organization'' means an organization that is described in 
        section 501(c)(3) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1968 and 
        exempt from taxation under section 501(a) of such Code.
            (4) State.--The term ``State'' means each of the several 
        States, the District of Columbia, each commonwealth, territory, 
        or possession of the United States, and each federally 
        recognized Tribe.
                                 <all>
```
TREATIES AND OTHER INTERNATIONAL ACTS SERIES 10-801 

________________________________________________________________________ 

JUDICIAL ASSISTANCE 

Cooperation 

 Agreement Between 

the UNITED STATES OF AMERICA 

and the EUROPEAN UNION 

Signed at Brussels June 28, 2010 
 NOTE BY THE DEPARTMENT OF STATE 

 Pursuant to Public Law 89—497, approved July 8, 1966 

(80 Stat. 271; 1 U.S.C. 113)—

“. . .the Treaties and Other International Acts Series issued 

under the authority of the Secretary of State shall be competent 

 evidence . . . of the treaties, international agreements other than 

treaties, and proclamations by the President of such treaties and 

international agreements other than treaties, as the case may be, 

therein contained, in all the courts of law and equity and of maritime 

jurisdiction, and in all the tribunals and public offices of the 

United States, and of the several States, without any further proof 

or authentication thereof.” 
EUROPEAN UNION 

Judicial Assistance: Cooperation 

 Agreement signed at Brussels June 28, 2010; 

 Entered into force August 1, 2010. 






























NOTE: Only English text will be printed in this publication.