alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
## In the Court of Appeals Second Appellate District of Texas

at Fort Worth

___________________________

No. 02

- 19

- 00081

- CV

___________________________

On Appeal from the 153rd District Court
Tarrant County, Texas

Trial Court No. 153

- 302339

- 18

Before Kerr, Birdwell, and Bassel, JJ. Per Curiam Memorandum Opinion 

### M C 

### C LINTON 

### E NERGY 

### G ROUP



### , L.L.C.

, Appellant

V



### .

B UCKHEAD



### - 1750 W ESTPARK 

### I NDUSTRIAL



### , L.P. , Appellee2 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND JUDGMENT

We have considered “Appellant ’ s Motion to Dismiss Its Appeal.” We grant the

motion and dismiss the a p peal. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.1(a)(1), 43.2(f).

Appellant must pay all costs of this appeal. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.1(d), 43.4.

Per Curiam

Delivered : August 22, 2019
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

DAY ELEV

 123.84

 122.88

 122.40

 121.91

 121.81

 122.10

 122.21

 122.88

 123.13

 123.60

 124.34

 124.87

 124.88

 124.09

 123.92

 123.26

 123.40

 123.05

 123.35

 123.66

 123.89

 123.64

 124.64

 123.38

 122.12

 123.46

 124.25

 124.30

 123.87

 123.66

 8,186

 7,737

 7,521

 7,303

 7,261

 7,386

 7,436

 7,737

 7,852

 8,073

 8,431

 8,696

 8,701

 8,306

 8,223

 7,913

 7,979

 7,815

 7,956

 8,101

 8,209

 8,092

 8,581

 7,970

 7,395

 8,007

 8,386

 8,411

 8,200

 8,101

STORAGE

+10

-449

-216

-218

-42

+125

+50

+301

+115

+221

+358

+265

+5

-395

-83

-310

+66

-164

+141

+145

+108

-117

+489

-611

-575

+612

+379

+25

-211

-99

CHANGE

3,561

3,289

3,407

3,437

3,533

3,701

3,618

3,746

3,595

3,650

3,718

3,789

4,959

5,107

5,472

5,287

5,274

4,648

4,609

4,615

4,607

4,459

4,823

4,240

4,156

4,879

4,738

4,836

5,672

5,944

INFLOW

 3,456

 3,418

 3,415

 3,450

 3,456

 3,538

 3,496

 3,497

 3,440

 3,442

 3,442

 3,559

 4,861

 4,906

 4,896

 4,836

 4,897

 4,636

 4,442

 4,446

 4,456

 4,420

 4,479

 4,452

 4,350

 4,012

 4,447

 4,447

 4,855

 4,871

POWER

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 303

 522

 512

 247

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 462

 3

 278

 826

 1,026

SPILL

 60

 60

 60

 60

 60

 60

 60

 60

 60

 60

 60

 60

 60

 60

 60

 60

 60

 60

 60

 60

 60

 60

 60

 60

 60

 60

 60

 60

 60

 60

HATCHERY

 5

 2

 6

 2

 3

 5

 2

 2

 2

 2

 1

 1

 0

 2

 1

 0

 2

 0

 1

 1

 2

 3

 2

 1

 1

 1

 2

 3

 2

 2

C.F.S.

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

APRIL 2000 LAKE NATOMA DAILY OPERATIONS RUN DATE: May 2, 2000

IN LAKE

EVAP

C.F.S.

COMPUTED*

ACRE-FEET

RELEASE - C.F.S.

TOTALS -75 131,369 124,318 4,179 1,800 59

ACRE-FEET -75 260,570 246,585 8,289 3,570 117

COMMENTS:

* COMPUTED INFLOW IS THE SUM OF CHANGE IN STORAGE, RELEASES AND EVAPORATION.

SUMMARY

RELEASES (ACRE-FEET)

POWER 246,585

SPILL 8,289

FOLSOM SOUTH CANAL

HATCHERY

 2,083

 3,570

 8,176

FOLSOM

SOUTH 

CANAL

 35

 35

 35

 35

 35

 35

 35

 35

 35

 35

 35

 35

 35

 35

 35

 35

 35

 35

 35

 35

 35

 35

 35

 35

 35

 35

 35

 35

 35

 35

 1,050

 2,083

(1)

(1) INCHES OF EVAPORATION TAKEN FROM FOLSOM PAN.

RELEASES (ACRE-FEET)

TOTAL 260,527

Table 12
**EXHIBIT 32.2**

** **

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

 

 

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Beacon Power Corporation (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ending March 31, 2011 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, James M. Spiezio, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:

 

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

 
| /s/ James M. Spiezio    |   |
|-------------------------|--------|
| James M. Spiezio        |   |
| Chief Financial Officer |   |
|                    |   |
| May 10, 2011            |   |

 

1

----
### THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS

13

- 19

- 00133

- CV

Esequiel De La Paz v. Ofelia Gutierrez

On a ppeal from the 105th District Court of Kleberg County , Texas

Trial Cause No. 18

- 290

- D

JUDGMENT THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS, having considered this cause on appeal, vacates the trial court’s orders and dismisses the case for want of jurisdiction

. The Court orders the orders VACATED and the case DISMISSED FOR WANT OF
JURISDICTION in accordance with its opinion . Costs of the appeal are adjudged against appe llant.
We further order this decision certified below for observance. April 29 , 2019
Exhibit 31.2CERTIFICATIONSI, Marc Valentin certify that: 1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31,2006 of National Bancshares Corporation;  2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of amaterial fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made,in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleadingwith respect to the period covered by this report;  3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financialinformation included in this report, fairly present in all material respects thefinancial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, andfor, the periods presented in this report;  4. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible forestablishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in ExchangeAct Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have: a. Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or causedsuch disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision,to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including itsconsolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities,particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;  b. Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosurecontrols and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about theeffectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of theperiod covered by this report based on such evaluation; and  c. Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’sinternal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’smost recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the caseof an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely tomaterially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting;and 5. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on ourmost recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to theregistrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors(or persons performing the equivalent functions): a. All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in thedesign or operation of internal control over financial reporting which arereasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record,process, summarize and report financial information; and  b. Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management orother employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internalcontrol over financial reporting.      Date: March 20, 2007          /s/ Marc Valentin   Marc Valentin, Sr. Vice President & Treasurer and    Chief Financial Officer  
33
###### Editorial Note on Part 44

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 44 appear by T.D. ATF-464, 66 FR 43480, Aug. 20, 2001, and T.D. ATF-480, 67 FR 30801-30803, May 8, 2002.

#### § 44.191 To officers of the armed forces for subsequent exportation.

Where tobacco products, and cigarette papers and tubes are removed from a factory or an export warehouse for delivery to officers of the armed forces of the United States in this country for subsequent shipment to, and use by, the armed forces outside the United States, the manufacturer or export warehouse proprietor shall consign such articles to the receiving officer at the armed forces base or installation, in this country, to which they are to be delivered.

(72 Stat. 1418, as amended; 26 U.S.C. 5704)

[T.D. 6871, 31 FR 52, Jan. 4, 1966. Redesignated at 40 FR 16835, Apr. 15, 1975, and amended by T.D. ATF-232, 51 FR 28088, Aug. 5, 1986; T.D. ATF-243, 51 FR 43194, Dec. 1, 1986]
(No. 78-CC-l 175

#### George Coles, Claimant, *v.*State of Illinois, Respondent.

*Order filed August 9, 1979.*

Per Curiam.

Claimant, an inmate of an Illinois penal institution, has brought this action to recover the value of certain items of personal property of which he was *784allegedly possessed while incarcerated. Claimant contends that his property was lost, misplaced, stolen or destroyed while he was imprisoned, and that the loss of his property was proximately caused by the negligence of employees of the State of Illinois.

In *Bargas v. State, 32 Ill.Ct.*Cl.__, this Court held that the State of Illinois does not owe a duty to inmates of its penal institutions to safeguard property which inmates keep in their cells. In the companion case of *Doubling v. State, 32 Ill.Ct.Cl.1,*we further held that only where the State takes actual physical possession of the property of an inmate, as during the course of his transfer between penal institutions, does a duty arise to use reasonable care in protecting the inmate’s property.

The complaint in this action does not allege that Claimant’s property was delivered to agents of the State, but rather that the property disappeared or was damaged in Claimant’s cell. Under our reasoning in *Bargas v. State, supra,*and *Doubling v. State, supra,*the complaint herein fails to state a claim upon which relief can be granted.

It is therefore ordered that this cause be, and hereby is, dismissed.
Exhibit 23.1

INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' CONSENT AND REPORT ON SCHEDULE

To
the Shareholders and Board of Directors of Lone Star Technologies, Inc. and subsidiaries (the "Company"):

We
consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration Statement No. 333-41130 of Lone Star Technologies, Inc. on Form S-3, and
Registration Statement Nos. 33-64805, 333-38458, 333-46310 and 333-46312 on Form S-8, of our report dated March 13,
2003 (which report expresses an unqualified opinion and includes explanatory paragraphs relating to the adoption of Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 142, and the application of
procedures relating to certain disclosures of financial statement amounts related to the 2001 and 2000 financial statements that were audited by other auditors who have ceased operations and for which
we have expressed no opinion or other form of assurance other than with respect to such disclosures) appearing in this Annual Report on Form 10-K of Lone Star
Technologies, Inc. for the year ended December 31, 2002.

Our
audit of the financial statements referred to in our aforementioned report also included the financial statement schedule of Lone Star Technologies, Inc., listed in
Item 8. This financial statement schedule is the responsibility of the Company's management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion based on our audit. In our opinion, such 2002 financial
statement schedule, when considered in relation to the 2002 basic financial statements taken as a whole, presents fairly in all material respects the information set forth therein. The financial
statement schedule for the years ended December 31, 2001 and 2000 were audited by other auditors who have ceased operations. Those auditors expressed an opinion, in their report dated
January 22, 2002, that such 2001 and 2000 financial statement schedule, when considered in relation to the 2001 and 2000 basic financial statements taken as a whole (prior to the disclosures
referred to above), presented fairly in all material respects the information set forth therein.

Dallas,
Texas
March 21, 2003

---

QuickLinks
EXHIBIT 23.1

CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement on
Form S-8 (Nos. 33-48079, 33-82124, 33-60611, 333-05933, 333-28887, 333-37843, 333-71261, 333-86147, 333-39588, 333-97793,
333-105879, 333-109301, 333-117086, 333-121060, 333-125160, 333-129890 and 333-136747) of Tekelec of our report dated
February 27, 2008 relating to the financial statements and the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting, which appears in
this Form 10-K.

/s/ PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP

Raleigh, North Carolina
   February 27, 2008

---
```

[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 46 (Tuesday, March 10, 2015)]
[Notices]
[Pages 12628-12629]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2015-05495]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

EXPORT-IMPORT BANK OF THE UNITED STATES

Notice of Open Meeting of the Advisory Committee of the Export-
Import Bank of the United States (Ex-Im Bank)

SUMMARY: The Advisory Committee was established by Public Law 98-181, 
November 30, 1983, to advise the Export-Import Bank on its programs and 
to provide comments for inclusion in the report on competitiveness of 
the Export-Import Bank of the United States to Congress.
    Time and Place: Wednesday, March 18, 2015 from 11:00 a.m.-3:00 p.m. 
A break for lunch will be at the expense of the attendee. Security 
processing will be necessary for reentry into the building. The meeting 
will be held at Ex-Im Bank in the Main Conference Room--11th floor, 811 
Vermont Avenue NW., Washington, DC 20571.
    Agenda: Agenda items include updates for the Advisory Committee 
members regarding: Ex-Im Bank goals for 2015; Ex-Im Bank's upcoming 
annual conference; and the report on competitiveness to Congress.
    Public Participation: The meeting will be open to public 
participation, and 10 minutes will be set aside for oral questions or 
comments. Members of the public may also file written statement(s) 
before or after the meeting. If you plan to attend, a photo ID must be 
presented at the guard's desk as part of the clearance process into the 
building, you may contact Niki Shepperd at niki.shepperd@exim.gov to be 
placed on an attendee list. If any person wishes auxiliary aids (such 
as a sign language interpreter) or other special accommodations, please 
email Niki Shepperd at niki.shepperd@exim.gov prior to March 16, 2015.
    Members of the Press: For members of the Press planning to attend 
the meeting, a photo ID must be presented at the guard's desk as part 
of the clearance process into the building;

[[Page 12629]]

please email Niki Shepperd at niki.shepperd@exim.gov to be placed on an 
attendee list.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For further information, contact Niki 
Shepperd, 811 Vermont Ave. NW., Washington, DC 20571, at 
niki.shepperd@exim.gov.

Lloyd Ellis,
Program Specialist, Office of the General Counsel.
[FR Doc. 2015-05495 Filed 3-9-15; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 6690-01-P
```
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY ELEV

 584.27

 584.20

 583.69

 583.95

 583.83

 584.16

 583.91

 583.80

 583.86

 583.39

 582.80

 582.61

 583.35

 583.20

 583.55

 583.03

 582.78

 582.62

 582.14

 582.65

 582.61

 582.42

 581.92

 582.83

 582.43

 581.61

 579.97

 579.58

 578.94

 577.74

 580.23

 22,057

 22,013

 21,702

 21,860

 21,787

 21,989

 21,835

 21,769

 21,805

 21,520

 21,164

 21,050

 21,495

 21,404

 21,617

 21,301

 21,152

 21,056

 20,770

 21,074

 21,050

 20,937

 20,639

 21,182

 20,943

 20,457

 19,507

 19,288

 18,929

 18,269

 19,656

STORAGE

-61

-44

-311

+158

-73

+202

-154

-66

+36

-285

-356

-114

+445

-91

+213

-316

-149

-96

-286

+304

-24

-113

-298

+543

-239

-486

-950

-219

-359

-660

+1,387

CHANGE

6,370

6,358

6,258

6,618

6,467

6,638

6,205

6,069

6,002

5,887

5,885

5,901

6,278

5,913

6,059

5,794

5,958

6,015

5,953

6,169

6,017

5,827

5,814

6,111

5,797

5,728

5,530

5,950

5,900

5,685

6,673

INFLOW

 6,398

 6,375

 6,410

 6,535

 6,502

 6,534

 6,279

 6,101

 5,981

 6,027

 6,061

 5,953

 6,050

 5,955

 5,949

 5,952

 6,030

 6,061

 6,096

 6,013

 6,025

 5,884

 5,963

 5,837

 5,917

 5,972

 6,008

 6,058

 6,080

 6,015

 5,974

POWER

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

SPILL

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

FISHTRAP

 3

 5

 5

 3

 2

 2

 4

 1

 3

 4

 3

 5

 4

 4

 3

 1

 3

 2

 1

 3

 4

 0

 1

 0

 0

 1

 1

 2

 1

 3

 0

C.F.S.

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

OCTOBER 2010 KESWICK RESERVOIR DAILY OPERATIONS RUN DATE: November 1, 2010

RES.

EVAP

C.F.S.

COMPUTED*

ACRE-FEET

RELEASE - C.F.S. 

TOTALS -2,462 187,829 188,995 0 0 74

ACRE-FEET -2,462 372,559 374,872 0 0 147

SUMMARY

RELEASE (ACRE-FEET)

POWER 374,872

SPILL 0

 22,118

FISH TRAP 0

SPRING

CR. P. P.

RELEASE (1)

 1,456

 1,404

 1,505

 1,096

 1,675

 1,611

 1,548

 1,229

 1,575

 1,647

 1,656

 1,598

 1,623

 1,183

 1,182

 1,162

 1,245

 1,219

 1,190

 1,660

 1,741

 1,227

 1,216

 1,365

 1,305

 1,553

 1,444

 1,444

 1,441

 1,443

 1,699

 44,342

 87,952

*COMPUTED INFLOW IS SUM OF CHANGE IN STORAGE, RELEASES, AND EVAPORATION.

(1) EVAPORATION RECORDS TAKEN FROM SHASTA PAN.

SHASTA

RELEASE

C.F.S

 5,121

 4,880

 4,748

 5,303

 4,375

 4,459

 4,239

 4,451

 4,023

 3,908

 4,180

 4,283

 4,426

 4,426

 4,567

 4,169

 4,432

 4,533

 4,474

 4,408

 4,176

 4,253

 4,357

 4,194

 4,284

 3,901

 3,550

 4,182

 4,259

 3,818

 4,303

 134,682

 267,142
# Phantom 2 Vision +

Mission Checklists

psFlight.org

Arrival Checklist

1. If day and operating out of back of

vehicle, point vehicle into sun.

2. Remove case and place on level surface.

3. Check distance to nearest airport and/or

controlled airspace using smartphone or

tablet app.

4. If required, use VHF aviation transceiver,

to contact tower of field if closer than 5

NM.

5. Inform tower / CTAF of UAS ops, location,

and max height of flight.

Preflight Checklist

1. Remove transmitter.

2. Router - On

3. Transmitter - On

4. Toggle Switches - Full Up

5. Video Monitor - On

6. Remove UAS from case.

7. Gimbal Lock & Lens Cap - Removed

8. Micro-SD card - Inserted.

9. UAS Battery - Inserted

10. Place UAS in clear and safe launch and

recovery position if it returns to home.

11. UAS Battery - On

12. Wifi Connection to Monitor - Verified

13. DJI Application - Load

14. DJI application - Connect to Camera

15. SD Card - Format

16. Camera - Full Up

17. Satellite Connections - Verified

18. Charge Levels - Safe for Flight

19. Video Recording - Start

20. Takeoff After Takeoff Checklist

1. Hover approximately ten feet above the

ground to confirm UAS is under control.

2. All sticks operate correctly while in hover

- Verified

Pre-Landing Checklist

1. Camera - Full Up

2. Video Recorder - Stop

3. Landing Zone - Clear / Safe

Post-Landing Checklist - Returning to

Flight Immediately

1. Battery - Remove & Replace

2. Wifi Connection to Monitor - Verified

3. DJI application - Connect to Camera

4. Takeoff

End of Ops Checklist

1. Battery - Off

2. Transmitter - Off

3. Router - Off

4. Notify Tower/CTAF - End of Ops
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF 

### PENNSYLVANIA MIDDLE DISTRICT COMMONWEALTH OF 

### PENNSYLVANIA, : No. 911 MAL2016 

### Respondent v. 

### ERNEST CULBREATH, Petitioner : Petition 

### forAllowance of

### Appeal from
: the Order ofthe 

### Superior Court

ORDER PER 

### CURIAM AND NOW, this 30th day of May, 2017, the Petition 

### for Allowance of 

### Appeal and Motion for 

### Appointment of 

### Counsel are DENIED.
§ 81.18 The record. ( a ) The ALJ arranges for any evidentiary hearing or oral argument to be recorded and transcribed and makes the transcript available to the parties. Transcripts are made available to non-Departmental parties at a cost not to exceed the actual cost of duplication.
( b ) The record of a hearing on the record consists of— ( 1 ) All papers filed in the proceeding;
( 2 ) Documentary evidence admitted by the ALJ;
( 3 ) The transcript of any evidentiary hearing or oral argument; and
( 4 ) Rulings, orders, and subpoenas issued by the ALJ.
(Authority: 5 U.S.C. 556(e), 557(c); 20 U.S.C. 1221e-3(a)(1), 1234(f)(1), 3474(a))
[54 FR 19512, May 5, 1989, as amended at 58 FR 43473, Aug. 16, 1993]
ORDER

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA

No s . DA 20 - 0314, DA 20 - 0315 IN THE MATTER S OF S.P. and K.L.N. , Youth s in Need of Care **ORDER** Upon consideration of Appellant Mother , K.S.’s , motion to consolidate, and good cause appearing therefore, Appellant’s motion is GRANTED and Cause Nos. 20 - 0314 and 20 - 0315 are hereby consolidated under Cause No. DA 20 - 0314 and henceforth captioned In the Matters of S.P. and K.L.N.

Electronically signed by: Mike McGrath Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

July 22 2020

07/22/2020
#### In the Matter of George J. Gillespie et al., Constituting the Board of Water Supply of the City of New York, Respondents, Relative to Acquiring Real Property for and on Behalf of the City of New York, in the Towns of Shandaken and Olive, Ulster County. (Esopus Creek Parcel 17.) Eugene Gormley, Appellant.

All concur.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   Year
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1995
<PERIOD-START>                                 JAN-31-1995
<PERIOD-END>                                   DEC-31-1995
<CASH>                                         172,000
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  1,459,000
<ALLOWANCES>                                   0
<INVENTORY>                                    615,000
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               2,504,000
<PP&E>                                         10,434,000
<DEPRECIATION>                                 1,996,000
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 11,929,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          12,563,000
<BONDS>                                        0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       1,000
<OTHER-SE>                                     14,141,000
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   11,929,000
<SALES>                                        9,790,000
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               9,790,000
<CGS>                                          0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  15,792,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             2,601,000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                0
<INCOME-TAX>                                   0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            0
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (8,603,000)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  (.99)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  (.99)
        


</TABLE>