alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### Chicago, Burlington & Quincy Railroad Company, appellee, v. Jacob Klein, Treasurer of Gage County, appellant.

Filed May 4, 1898.

No. 9160.

Counties: Taxation: Limitation. Approval of and adherence to the views expressed in a former opinion.in this cause announced, the decree of the trial court reversed, and the action dismissed. (For prior decision see *Chicago, B. £ Q. R. Co. v. Klein,*52 Neh. 258.)

Rehearing of case reported in 52 Neb. 258.

*Former decision sustained,.*

*Samuel Rinaker, R. W. Sabin,*and *R. S. Bibb,*for appellant.

*Charles F. Manderson, E. R. Duffle, J. W. Deweese, James E. Kelby,*and *A. Hazlett, contra.*

Harrison, C. J.

After the county of Gage had adopted and perfected township organization, in the regular course of affairs of the county and township governments, there were assessed by the county authorities on the property of the railway company certain taxes for county purposes, not in excess in the aggregate of fifteen mills on the dollar, or the maximum which they could assess. There had been for and in each of the townships in which there was situated property of the company an assessment, in the manner prescribed by law, of taxes on such property, not to exceed seven mills on the dollar of valuation, the limit provided by law. Aggregated, however, the township assessment and the county assessment exceeded fifteen mills on the doRar. The company denied the right of collection of the amount in excess of fifteen mills and instituted and prosecuted to a successful termination this action in the district court of said county *782to restrain the county treasurer from the collection of such excess. The cause was by the treasurer appealed, to this court, and, as the result of a hearing, the decree of the district court was reversed and the cause dismissed. (See opinion reported in 52 Neb. 258.) A motion for a rehearing on the part of the company was sustained and there have been a reargument and a second submission. We have again carefully examined and considered the points in controversy and are satisfied that the determinations of them announced in the former decision have in their support the sounder reasons than have or can be urged in favor of the contrary ones which we have been asked to adopt, and that the conclusions of the opinion to which we have referred were correct and right. The subjects involved and presented were so thoroughly reviewed in the prior decision that we deem it wholly unnecessary to again discuss them here. We approve and adhere to the views there expressed. It follows that the decree of the lower court is reversed and the action dismissed.

Judgment accordingly.

Norval, J.,

dissenting.

I dissent from the foregoing opinion. I adopt the views expressed by Brace, J., in delivering the judgment of the court in *State v. Missouri P. R. Co.,*123 Mo. 72.
### §105. Books for Library of Congress

The distribution of embossed books manufactured by the American Printing House for the Blind at Louisville, Kentucky, out of the income of the fund provided by sections 101, 102, and 104 of this title, shall include one copy of every book so manufactured to be deposited in the Library of Congress at Washington.

(Mar. 4, 1913, ch. 142, §1, 37 Stat. 748.)
### §4320. Importer of record program

#### (a) Establishment

Not later than the date that is 180 days after February 24, 2016, the Secretary of Homeland Security shall establish an importer of record program to assign and maintain importer of record numbers.

#### (b) Requirements

The Secretary shall ensure that, as part of the importer of record program, U.S. Customs and Border Protection—

(1) develops criteria that importers must meet in order to obtain an importer of record number, including—

(A) criteria to ensure sufficient information is collected to allow U.S. Customs and Border Protection to verify the existence of the importer requesting the importer of record number;

(B) criteria to ensure sufficient information is collected to allow U.S. Customs and Border Protection to identify linkages or other affiliations between importers that are requesting or have been assigned importer of record numbers; and

(C) criteria to ensure sufficient information is collected to allow U.S. Customs and Border Protection to identify changes in address and corporate structure of importers;

(2) provides a process by which importers are assigned importer of record numbers;

(3) maintains a centralized database of importer of record numbers, including a history of importer of record numbers associated with each importer, and the information described in subparagraphs (A), (B), and (C) of paragraph (1);

(4) evaluates and maintains the accuracy of the database if such information changes; and

(5) takes measures to ensure that duplicate importer of record numbers are not issued.

#### (c) Report

Not later than one year after February 24, 2016, the Secretary shall submit to the Committee on Finance of the Senate and the Committee on Ways and Means of the House of Representatives a report on the importer of record program established under subsection (a).

#### (d) Number defined

In this section, the term "number", with respect to an importer of record, means a filing identification number described in section 24.5 of title 19, Code of Federal Regulations (or any corresponding similar regulation) that fully supports the requirements of subsection (b) with respect to the collection and maintenance of information.

(Pub. L. 114–125, title I, §114, Feb. 24, 2016, 130 Stat. 142.)
###### Editorial Note on Part 28

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 28 appear by T.D. ATF-477, 67 FR 18087 through 18090, Apr. 15, 2002.

#### § 28.107 Disposition of forms.

TTB Form 5100.11 and any accompanying package gauge record shall be distributed by the proprietor in accordance with the instruction on TTB Form 5100.11.

(Approved by the Office of Management and Budget under control number 1512-0250)

(Sec. 201, Pub. L. 85-859, 72 Stat. 1362, as amended (26 U.S.C. 5214))

[T.D. ATF-198, 50 FR 8560, Mar. 1, 1985, as amended by T.D. TTB-8, 69 FR 3832, Jan. 27, 2004]
### Division 4—Model Program Community Partnership and Counseling Grants
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY ELEV

 3,448.15

 3,448.20

 3,448.26

 3,448.33

 3,448.38

 3,448.57

 3,448.57

 3,448.64

 3,448.75

 3,448.94

 3,449.13

 3,449.37

 3,449.50

 3,449.68

 3,449.74

 3,449.81

 3,449.93

 3,450.05

 3,450.17

 3,450.23

 3,450.36

 3,450.48

 3,450.67

 3,450.91

 3,451.16

 3,451.40

 3,451.59

 3,451.83

 3,451.97

 3,452.20

 3,452.32

 27,702

 27,728

 27,759

 27,796

 27,822

 27,920

 27,920

 27,957

 28,014

 28,113

 28,212

 28,338

 28,407

 28,501

 28,533

 28,569

 28,632

 28,696

 28,759

 28,791

 28,860

 28,924

 29,025

 29,152

 29,286

 29,415

 29,517

 29,646

 29,721

 29,846

 29,911

STORAGE

+36

+26

+31

+37

+26

+98

+0

+37

+57

+99

+99

+126

+69

+94

+32

+36

+63

+64

+63

+32

+69

+64

+101

+127

+134

+129

+102

+129

+75

+125

+65

CHANGE

37.1

32.1

33.6

38.8

31.3

69.0

20.6

38.0

47.0

66.9

65.9

81.6

52.9

65.7

33.1

36.4

48.9

51.6

49.4

35.5

52.8

50.3

68.1

81.0

84.6

81.5

69.6

83.0

55.0

83.5

53.1

INFLOW

 18

 18

 17

 19

 17

 18

 19

 18

 17

 16

 15

 17

 17

 17

 16

 17

 16

 18

 16

 18

 17

 17

 16

 16

 16

 15

 17

 17

 16

 16

 17

CONDUIT

 .0

 .0

 .0

 .0

 .0

 .0

 .0

 .0

 .0

 .0

 .0

 .0

 .0

 .0

 .0

 .0

 .0

 .0

 .0

 .0

 .0

 .0

 .0

 .0

 .0

 .0

 .0

 .0

 .0

 .0

 .0

SPILL

 1.0

 1.0

 1.0

 1.0

 1.0

 1.0

 1.0

 1.0

 1.0

 1.0

 1.0

 1.0

 1.0

 1.0

 1.0

 1.0

 1.0

 1.0

 1.0

 1.0

 1.0

 1.0

 1.0

 1.0

 1.0

 1.0

 1.0

 1.0

 1.0

 1.0

 1.0

PK CR

 0.0

 0.0

 0.0

 0.1

 0.2

 0.6

 0.6

 0.3

 0.3

 0.0

 0.0

 0.1

 0.1

 0.3

 0.0

 0.3

 0.1

 0.3

 0.6

 0.4

 0.0

 0.0

 0.2

 0.0

 0.0

 0.5

 0.2

 0.0

 0.2

 3.5

 2.3

C.F.S.

 .000

 .000

 .000

 .004

 .009

 .034

 .035

 .015

 .015

 .000

 .000

 .008

 .006

 .018

 .000

 .020

 .008

 .016

 .032

 .024

 .000

 .000

 .010

 .000

 .000

 .030

 .010

 .000

 .010

 .200

 .130

INCHES

 .01

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .02

 .36

 .47

 .00

 .01

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .07

 .21

 .44

 .26

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .03

 .00

 .00

 .00

PRECIP

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

JANUARY 2003 JENKINSON LAKE DAILY OPERATIONS RUN DATE: 02/25/2003

IN LAKE

EVAPORATION

INCHES

C.F.S.

COMPUTED*

ACRE-FEET

RELEASE - C.F.S. 

TOTALS +2,245 1,697.9 524 31.0 0.0 11.2 .634 1.88

ACRE-FEET +2,245 3,367.8 1,039 61.5 0.0 22.2

COMMENTS:

* COMPUTED INFLOW IS THE SUM OF CHANGE IN STORAGE, RELEASES AND EVAPORATION.

DATA BASED ON 24 HOUR PERIOD ENDING 0800.

SUMMARY

RELEASE (ACRE-FEET)

CAMINO-CONDUIT 1,039.4

SLY PARK CREEK

SPILL

 61.5

 0.0

 737.9

PRECIPITATION

THIS MONTH =

JULY 1, 2002 TO DATE = 20.39

 27,666

 301.5 1.88

CAMINO SLY

CAMP

CREEK

C.F.S.

 17

 18

 20

 20

 22

 24

 25

 26

 27

 39

 52

 44

 40

 39

 36

 33

 32

 34

 34

 34

 34

 38

 54

 77

 65

 63

 63

 74

 62

 57

 55

 1,258

 2,495

E.I.D. PROJECT

E.I.D. WATER RIGHTS
### §4045. Authority to conduct autopsies

A chief executive officer of a Federal penal or correctional facility may, pursuant to rules prescribed by the Director, order an autopsy and related scientific or medical tests to be performed on the body of a deceased inmate of the facility in the event of homicide, suicide, fatal illness or accident, or unexplained death, when it is determined that such autopsy or test is necessary to detect a crime, maintain discipline, protect the health or safety of other inmates, remedy official misconduct, or defend the United States or its employees from civil liability arising from the administration of the facility. To the extent consistent with the needs of the autopsy or of specific scientific or medical tests, provisions of State and local law protecting religious beliefs with respect to such autopsies shall be observed. Such officer may also order an autopsy or post-mortem operation, including removal of tissue for transplanting, to be performed on the body of a deceased inmate of the facility, with the written consent of a person authorized to permit such an autopsy or post-mortem operation under the law of the State in which the facility is located.

(Added Pub. L. 99–646, §67(a), Nov. 10, 1986, 100 Stat. 3616.)
Editorial Note on Part 46
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 46 appear by T.D. ATF-457, 66 FR 32220, 32221, June 14, 2001.

§ 46.107 Penalty for failure to file return or to pay tax. ( a ) *Failure to file return.* Any person required by this subpart to file a return on TTB Form 5630.5t who fails to file the return on or before the date for filing prescribed in § 46.103 must pay, in addition to the tax, a delinquency penalty, unless it is shown that such failure is due to reasonable cause and not due to willful neglect (see § 46.109). The delinquency penalty for failure to file the return on or before the last date prescribed will be 5 percent of the amount required to be shown as tax on the return if the failure to file is for not more than one month; with an additional 5 percent for each additional month or fraction thereof during which the delinquency continues, but not more than 25 percent in the aggregate.
( b ) *Failure to pay tax.* Any person who files a return on TTB Form 5630.5t under this subpart and who fails to pay the amount shown as tax on the return on or before the date prescribed in § 46.103 for payment of such tax, must pay a penalty, in addition to the tax, unless it is shown that such failure is due to reasonable cause and not due to willful neglect (see § 46.109). The penalty for failure to pay the tax on or before the date prescribed for payment is 0.5 percent of the amount shown as tax on the return if the failure to pay is not for more than one month; with an additional 0.5 percent for each additional month or fraction thereof during which the failure continues, but not more than 25 percent in the aggregate. Any person required to pay the special tax who willfully fails to pay the tax shall be fined not more than $5,000, or imprisoned not more than 2 years, or both, for each such offense.
( c ) *Limitations.* With respect to any return on Form 5630.5t, the amount of the addition under paragraph (a) of this section will be reduced by the amount of the addition under paragraph (b) of this section for any month to which an addition to tax applies under both paragraph (a) and paragraph (b) of this section. If the amount of tax required to be shown as tax on the return is less than the amount shown as tax on such return, the penalties prescribed in paragraphs (a) and (b) of this section will be applied by substituting that lower amount.
(26 U.S.C. 5731, 6651)
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY ELEV

 359.95

 359.92

 359.92

 359.92

 359.92

 360.43

 360.39

 360.32

 360.27

 360.21

 360.15

 360.11

 360.08

 360.27

 360.21

 360.17

 360.11

 360.08

 360.04

 360.01

 360.27

 360.54

 360.52

 360.42

 360.33

 360.27

 360.58

 360.58

 360.58

 360.48

 360.38

 534

 531

 531

 531

 531

 567

 564

 559

 556

 552

 548

 545

 543

 556

 552

 549

 545

 543

 540

 538

 556

 575

 573

 566

 560

 556

 578

 578

 578

 571

 564

STORAGE

+3

-3

+0

+0

+0

+36

-3

-5

-3

-4

-4

-3

-2

+13

-4

-3

-4

-2

-3

-2

+18

+19

-2

-7

-6

-4

+22

+0

+0

-7

-7

CHANGE

 227

 214

 223

 223

 177

 178

 190

 190

 182

 200

 221

 230

 224

 246

 267

 237

 238

 220

 220

 220

 222

 223

 142

 162

 136

 125

 43

 0

 0

 0

 0

 401

 405

 402

 403

 401

 1,125

 1,226

 1,103

 1,004

 903

 802

 727

 651

 965

 886

 805

 703

 652

 577

 532

 953

 1,284

 1,503

 1,311

 1,104

 906

 1,444

 1,500

 1,503

 1,312

 1,107

SPILL

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

OUTLET

OAKDALE IRRIGATION DISTRICT

SOUTH SAN JOAQUIN IRRIGATION DISTRICT

TRI DAMS PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

OCTOBER 2017 GOODWIN RESERVOIR DAILY OPERATIONS RUN DATE: November 1, 2017

RES.

ACRE-FEET

RELEASE - C.F.S. 

TOTALS +33 0 28,600 5,380

ACRE-FEET +33 0 56,728 10,671

SUMMARY

RELEASE (ACRE-FEET)

JOINT MAIN CANAL 10,112

SOUTH MAIN CANAL 10,671

 77,511

 531

OUTLET 0

TOTAL 

TULLOCH

RELEASE

 918

 836

 930

 973

 888

 1,483

 1,478

 1,354

 1,286

 1,232

 1,196

 1,164

 1,112

 1,410

 1,305

 1,158

 1,065

 1,040

 895

 841

 1,230

 1,555

 1,653

 1,430

 1,230

 1,022

 1,457

 1,451

 1,451

 1,248

 1,042

 37,333

 74,050

JOINT MAIN OPERATED BY SSJID AND OID.

JOINT

MAIN

SOUTH

MAIN

SPILL 56,728

 306

 291

 356

 408

 378

 219

 104

 104

 163

 187

 216

 242

 266

 236

 211

 177

 179

 158

 114

 110

 111

 101

 77

 74

 121

 112

 45

 8

 8

 8

 8

 5,098

 10,112

RIVER CANALS
**Exhibit 23**

 

**Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm**

 

The Board of Directors 

First Indiana Corporation: 

 

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the registration statements (No. 33-64851,333-68927, 333-39926 and 333-119465) on Form S-8 of First Indiana Corporation of our reports dated March 1, 2006, with respect to the consolidated balance sheets of First Indiana Corporation as of December 31, 2005 and 2004, and therelated consolidated statements of earnings, shareholders’ equity and cash flows, for each of the years in the three-year period ended December 31, 2005, and management’s assessment of the effectiveness of internal control overfinancial reporting as of December 31, 2005 and the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2005, which reports appear in the December 31, 2005 annual report on Form 10-K of First IndianaCorporation. 

 

**/S/ KPMG**

 

Indianapolis, Indiana 

March 1, 2006
Cite as 2015 Ark. App. 403

ARKANSAS COURT OF APPEALS

DIVISION III

No. CV-15-167

STEPHANIE BRADSHAW

APPELLANT

V.

ARKANSAS DEPARTMENT OF

HUMAN SERVICES and MINOR

CHILD

APPELLEES

Opinion Delivered June 17, 2015

APPEAL FROM THE SALINE

COUNTY CIRCUIT COURT

[NO. 63JV-13-83]

HONORABLE GARY ARNOLD,

JUDGE

AFFIRMED; MOTION TO

WITHDRAW GRANTED

PHILLIP T. WHITEAKER, Judge

This appeal is from a Saline County Circuit Court order terminating Stephanie

Bradshaw’s parental rights to her daughter, C.K.1

 Appellant’s counsel has filed a no-merit

brief pursuant to Linker-Flores v. Arkansas Department of Human Services, 359 Ark. 131, 194

S.W.3d 739 (2004), and Arkansas Supreme Court and Court of Appeals Rule 6-9(i) (2014),

addressing all rulings decided adversely to Bradshaw—including the decision to

terminate—and asserting that there are no issues that would support a meritorious appeal.

Counsel has also filed a motion asking to be relieved as counsel. The clerk of this court sent

copies of the motion and brief to Bradshaw, advising her that she had the right to file pro se

points for reversal. She has not done so. 

1

 The court also terminated the parental rights of Jose Ibarra, the putative father of

C.K. He has not appealed that determination and is not a party to this appeal. 
Cite as 2015 Ark. App. 403

After carefully examining the record and the no-merit brief, we conclude that counsel

has complied with the requirements established by the Arkansas Supreme Court for no-merit

appeals in termination cases and that the appeal is wholly without merit. Accordingly, we

affirm by memorandum opinion the termination of Ms. Bradshaw’s parental rights. See In re

Memorandum Opinions, 16 Ark. App. 301, 700 S.W.2d 63 (1985); Ark. Sup. Ct. R. 5-2(e)

(2014). Counsel’s motion to withdraw is granted.

Affirmed; motion to withdraw granted.

KINARD and HOOFMAN, JJ., agree.

Suzanne Ritter Lumpkin, Arkansas Public Defender Commission, for appellant.

No response.

2
116TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 560 

AN ACT 

To amend section 6 of the Joint Resolution entitled ‘‘A 

Joint Resolution to approve the Covenant To Establish 

a Commonwealth of the Northern Mariana Islands in 

Political Union with the United States of America, and 

for other purposes’’. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 
2 

•HR 560 EH

1 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

2 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Northern Mariana Is3 lands Residents Relief Act’’. 

4 SEC. 2. LONG-TERM LEGAL RESIDENTS OF THE COMMON5 WEALTH OF THE NORTHERN MARIANA IS6 LANDS. 

7 Section 6(e)(6)(B) of the Joint Resolution entitled 

8 ‘‘A Joint Resolution to approve the Covenant To Establish 

9 a Commonwealth of the Northern Mariana Islands in Po10 litical Union with the United States of America, and for 

11 other purposes’’, approved March 24, 1976 (48 U.S.C. 

12 1806), is amended— 

13 (1) in clause (iii), by inserting ‘‘except in the 

14 case of an alien who meets the requirements of sub15 clause (VI) of clause (v),’’ before ‘‘resided continu16 ously and lawfully’’; and 

17 (2) in clause (v)— 

18 (A) in subclause (IV), by striking ‘‘; or’’ 

19 and inserting a semicolon; 

20 (B) in subclause (V), by striking the period 

21 at the end and inserting ‘‘;’’; and 

22 (C) by adding at the end the following: 

23 ‘‘(VI) was admitted to the Com24 monwealth as a Commonwealth Only 

25 Transitional Worker during fiscal year 

26 2015, and during every subsequent 
3 

•HR 560 EH

1 fiscal year beginning before the date 

2 of the enactment of the Northern 

3 Mariana Islands U.S. Workforce Act 

4 of 2018 (Public Law 115–218); or 

5 ‘‘(VII) resided in the Northern 

6 Mariana Islands as an investor under 

7 Commonwealth immigration law, and 

8 is presently a resident classified as a 

9 CNMI-only nonimmigrant under sec10 tion 101(a)(15)(E)(ii) of the Immigra11 tion and Nationality Act (8 U.S.C. 

12 1101(a)(15)(E)(ii)).’’. 

13 SEC. 3. DETERMINATION OF BUDGETARY EFFECTS. 

14 The budgetary effects of this Act, for the purpose of 

15 complying with the Statutory Pay-As-You-Go Act of 2010, 

16 shall be determined by reference to the latest statement 

17 titled ‘‘Budgetary Effects of PAYGO Legislation’’ for this 

18 Act, submitted for printing in the Congressional Record 

19 by the Chairman of the House Budget Committee, pro-
4 

•HR 560 EH

1 vided that such statement has been submitted prior to the 

2 vote on passage. 

Passed the House of Representatives February 26, 

2020. 

Attest: 

Clerk. 

116TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 560 

AN ACT 

To amend section 6 of the Joint Resolution entitled 

States of America, and for other purposes’’. iana Islands in Political Union with the United Establish a Commonwealth of the Northern Mar-‘‘A Joint Resolution to approve the Covenant To
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Earl W. Thorne, Appellant.

The communication will be considered as an application made to a justice of the Appellate Division, pursuant to the provisions of subdivision 3 of section 520 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, for a certificate permitting an appeal to the Court of Appeals. The stenographic minutes of the trial and the appellant’s points were read and considered by the court prior to rendering its. decision affirming the judgment of the Queens County Court convicting the defendant of the crimes of burglary in the third degree and possession of burglar’s instruments, as second felony offenses, and petit larceny. The application is denied by Mr. Justice Johnston. [See *ante,*p. 667.]
§ 31.41 Clubs or similar organizations. ( a ) Subject to paragraph (b) of this section, a club or similar organization is a dealer for purposes of this part if the club or organization: ( 1 ) Furnishes liquors to members under conditions constituting a sale (including the acceptance of orders therefor, furnishing the liquors ordered and collecting the price thereof); or
( 2 ) Conducts a bar for the sale of liquors on the occasion of an outing, picnic, or other entertainment, unless the club is a “limited retail dealer” described in § 31.35. The registration of the proprietor of the premises where the bar is located will not relieve the club or organization from its own obligation to register; or
( 3 ) Purchases liquors for members without prior agreement concerning payment therefor and such organization subsequently recoups those costs.
( b ) Compliance with the registration and other requirements of this part is not required if money is collected in advance from members for the purchase of liquors, or if money is advanced for the purchase of liquors pursuant to an agreement with the members for reimbursement.
(26 U.S.C. 5122)
### §1704. Balance not required

The failure of an educational agency to attain a balance, on the basis of race, color, sex, or national origin, of students among its schools shall not constitute a denial of equal educational opportunity, or equal protection of the laws.

(Pub. L. 93–380, title II, §205, Aug. 21, 1974, 88 Stat. 515.)

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date

Section effective on and after sixtieth day after Aug. 21, 1974, see section 2(c) of Pub. L. 93–380, set out as a note under section 1221–1 of this title.