20708 Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 71 / Wednesday, April 13, 2011 / Notices 

concerning the Commission may also be 

obtained by accessing its Internet server 

at http://www.usitc.gov. Hearingimpaired persons are advised that 

information on this matter can be 

obtained by contacting the 

Commission’s TDD terminal on (202) 

205–1810. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The 

Commission is issuing this notice 

because of the potential for an absence 

of an appropriation as of 12:01 a.m. on 

Saturday, April 9, 2011. If the 

Commission does not receive funding 

by 8:45 a.m. on Monday, April 11, 2011, 

the agency will shut down its 

investigative activities for the duration 

of the absence of appropriation. These 

activities include, but are not limited to, 

proceedings conducted under the 

authority of Title VII of the Tariff Act of 

1930, including antidumping and 

countervailing duty investigations and 

reviews; investigations and ancillary 

proceedings conducted under the 

authority of section 337 of the Tariff Act 

of 1930; and investigations conducted 

under the authority of section 332 of the 

Tariff Act of 1930. 

If a shutdown occurs, the schedules 

for all investigative activities will be 

tolled. All hearings and conferences will 

be postponed, subject to the exception 

described below. Once the Commission 

receives funding and the period of the 

shutdown ends, all schedules will 

resume starting with the day on which 

the Commission recommences 

operations. For example, if the 

shutdown lasts four days (e.g., April 11– 

14), then the deadline for the filing of 

any document on April 14 would be 

extended four days to April 18, 2011. If 

a rescheduled deadline falls on a 

nonbusiness day, the deadline will be 

extended to the next business day. The 

agency may reconsider schedules after 

resuming operations. 

Notwithstanding the general tolling of 

schedules, each staff conference in 

preliminary antidumping and 

countervailing duty investigations 

scheduled to take place on April 20, 21, 

or 22, 2011, will take place as scheduled 

if the Commission resumes operations 

by April 14, 2011. Should the shutdown 

not end before April 14, 2011, all 

conferences will be rescheduled 

pursuant to the general tolling 

provisions described above. 

The Commission’s World Wide Web 

site, at http://www.usitc.gov, will be 

updated to the extent practicable to 

provide information on the status of the 

agency. 

The authority for the Commission=s 

determination is contained in section 

335 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as 

amended (19 U.S.C. 1335), and in 31 

U.S.C. 1341 et seq. 

By order of the Commission. 

Issued: April 8, 2011. 

James R. Holbein, 

Acting Secretary to the Commission. 

[FR Doc. 2011–8842 Filed 4–12–11; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE P 

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE 

[OMB Number 1105–NEW] 

Agency Information Collection 

Activities: Proposed Collection; 

Comments Requested: Elder Justice 

Roadmap Project 

AGENCY: Civil Division, Department of 

Justice. 

ACTION: 60-day notice of information 

collection under review. 

The Civil Division of Department of 

Justice (DOJ) will be submitting the 

following information collection request 

to the Office of Management and Budget 

(OMB) for review and approval in 

accordance with the Paperwork 

Reduction Act of 1995. The proposed 

information collection is published to 

obtain comments from the public and 

affected agencies. June 13, 2011. This 

process is conducted in accordance with 

5 CFR 1320.10. 

If you have comments, especially on 

the estimated public burden or 

associated response time, suggestions, 

or need a copy of the proposed 

information collection instrument with 

instructions or additional information, 

please contact Laurie Feinberg, 601 D 

Street, NW., Room 9109, Washington, 

DC 20004; (202) 305–1789. 

Written comments concerning this 

information collection should be sent to 

the Office of Information and Regulatory 

Affairs, Office of Management and 

Budget, Attn: DOJ Desk Officer. The best 

way to ensure your comments are 

received is to e-mail them to 

oira_submission@omb.eop.gov or fax 

them to 202–395–7285. All comments 

should reference the 8 digit OMB 

number for the collection or the title of 

the collection. If you have questions 

concerning the collection, please call 

Laurie Feinberg at 202–305–1789 or the 

DOJ Desk Officer at 202–395–3176. 

Written comments and suggestions from 

the public and affected agencies 

concerning the proposed collection of 

information are encouraged. Your 

comments should address one or more 

of the following four points: 

—Evaluate whether the proposed 

collection of information is necessary 

for the proper performance of the 

functions of the agency, including 

whether the information will have 

practical utility; 

—Evaluate the accuracy of the agency’s 

estimate of the burden of the 

proposed collection of information, 

including the validity of the 

methodology and assumptions used; 

—Enhance the quality, utility, and 

clarity of the information to be 

collected; and 

—Minimize the burden of the collection 

of information on those who are to 

respond, including through the use of 

appropriate automated, electronic, 

mechanical, or other technological 

collection techniques or other forms 

of information technology, e.g., 

permitting electronic submission of 

responses. 

Overview of This Information 

Collection 

(1) Type of Information Collection: 

New collection. 

(2) Title of the Form/Collection: Elder 

Justice Roadmap Project. 

(3) Agency form number, if any, and 

the applicable component of the 

Department of Justice sponsoring the 

collection: None. 

(4) Affected public who will be asked 

or required to respond, as well as a brief 

abstract: Adult practitioners, advocates 

and researchers in professions related to 

elder justice. A recent review of 

literature related to elder justice 

indicates that the field remains largely 

fragmented and without a clear set of 

priorities or a roadmap for 

advancement. The purpose of this data 

collection is to identify policy, practice, 

and research priorities in the field of 

elder abuse, neglect, and exploitation 

and to help develop a strategic roadmap 

for activities to address those priorities. 

In the first phase of the study, concept 

mapping will be used to create a visual 

representation of the ways that 

professionals in the field perceive the 

priorities for elder justice. Concept 

mapping is a well-documented method 

of applied research that makes explicit, 

implicit theoretical models that can be 

used for planning and action. The 

process requires respondents to 

brainstorm a set of statements relevant 

to the topic of interest (‘‘brainstorming’’ 

task), individually sort these statements 

into piles based on perceived similarity 

(‘‘sorting’’ task), rate each statement on 

one or more scales (‘‘rating’’ task), and 

interpret the graphical representation 

that result from several multivariate 

analyses. The collection of data for all 

concept mapping activities will be 

facilitated via a dedicated project Web 

site. The second phase of the study 

includes a series of six face-to-face 

mstockstill on DSKH9S0YB1PROD with NOTICES

Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 71 / Wednesday, April 13, 2011 / Notices 20709 

facilitated discussions with relevant 

stakeholder groups, practitioners, and 

researchers. In addition up to 9–12 

interviews with experts in the various 

aspects of the field will be conducted to 

obtain their reaction to the preliminary 

concept map generated by the 

brainstorming, sorting, and rating 

process and asked to provide 

information about what may be missing, 

need amplification, or to be interrelated 

in a different manner than on the 

preliminary concept map. Guiding 

questions and discussion prompts, 

derived from the concept mapping 

results, will be used to gather 

information from the respondents on the 

meaning and potential use of the 

concept mapping results. This input 

will be aggregated and linked to the 

emerging conceptual framework that 

will result in a better understanding of 

the complex interrelationships between 

policy, practice, and research elements 

in the field of elder justice. Thus, the 

challenges, and needs of practitioners 

on the front lines will inform the work 

of researchers, and the researchers’ 

findings will inform the work of policy 

makers and practitioners, and the policy 

makers will communicate with 

researchers and practitioners about what 

information thy need to properly inform 

policy. A single concept mapping 

process will provide an efficient means 

for managing participation while 

simultaneously integrating perspectives 

that are complementary and mutually 

informative. 

(5) An estimate of the total number of 

respondents and the amount of time 

estimated for an average respondent to 

respond: It is estimated that 750 

respondents total will participate in the 

concept mapping phase of this 

collection, and that 60 respondents total 

will participate in the facilitated 

discussions. The table below shows the 

estimated number of respondents for 

each portion of the collection: 

Task Participation 

targets 

Total task 

target 

Concept Mapping:.

Brainstorming .................................................................................................................................................... 750 750 

Sorting .............................................................................................................................................................. 250 250 

Rating ............................................................................................................................................................... 750 750 

Total group target ...................................................................................................................................... ........................ 750 

Facilitated discussion Participation 

targets 

Total 

target 

Policy maker group 1 ............................................................................................................................................... 10 10 

Policy maker group 2 ............................................................................................................................................... 10 10 

Practitioner group 3 ................................................................................................................................................. 10 10 

Practitioner group 4 ................................................................................................................................................. 10 10 

Researcher group 5 ................................................................................................................................................. 10 10 

Researcher group 6 ................................................................................................................................................. 10 10 

Total group target .................................................................................................................................................... 10 60 

Expert Interview ....................................................................................................................................................... 9–12 9–12 

The brainstorming task will take 

respondents 5–10 minutes to complete. 

The sorting task will take respondents 

approximately 30–60 minutes to 

complete. The rating task will take 

respondents approximately 30 minutes 

to complete. None of these tasks will 

require participants to complete in one 

sitting; rather, participants can return to 

work on task completion as often as 

they chose, until the task deadline. 

Respondents will have approximately 

4 weeks to brainstorm and 

approximately 6 weeks to sort and rate. 

Facilitated discussions will require 

approximately 4 hours of respondents’ 

time. 

Expert interview will require no more 

than 90 minutes of respondents’ time. 

(6) An estimate of the total public 

burden (in hours) associated with the 

collection: There are an estimated 948 

total public burden hours associated 

with this collection. This is planned to 

be a one-time data collection. 

If additional information is required 

contact: Lynn Murray, Department 

Clearance Officer, Policy and Planning 

Staff, Justice Management Division, U.S. 

Department of Justice, Two Constitution 

Square, 145 N Street, NE., Room 2E– 

808, Washington, DC 20530. 

Dated: April 7, 2011. 

Lynn Murray, 

Department Clearance Officer, PRA, U.S. 

Department of Justice. 

[FR Doc. 2011–8788 Filed 4–12–11; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4410–12–P 

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE 

Notice of Lodging of Consent Decree 

Under the Comprehensive 

Environmental Response, 

Compensation and Liability Act 

(CERCLA) 

Consistent with Section 122(d)(2) of 

CERCLA, 42 U.S.C. 9622(d)(2), and 28 

CFR 50.7, notice is hereby given that on 

April 8, 2011, the proposed Consent 

Decree in United States v. John 

Williams, et al, Civil Action No. 11– 

00689–PHX–MEA, was lodged with the 

United States District Court for the 

District of Arizona. The proposed 

Consent Decree resolves the United 

States’ claims under Section 107(a) of 

the Comprehensive Environmental 

Response, Compensation, and Liability 

Act, 42 U.S.C. 9607(a), against John M. 

Williams, Jr., Arizona Public Service 

Co., the Salt River Project, Public 

Service Company of New Mexico, and 

El Paso Electric Co. relating to response 

costs incurred and to be incurred by the 

United States Environmental Protection 

Agency (‘‘EPA’’) at or from a Site known 

as the Gila River Indian Reservation 

Removal Site, also referred to as the Gila 

River Boundary Site, located in 

Maricopa County, Arizona. The consent 

decree also resolves potential CERCLA 

counterclaims against the United States 

Department of the Interior. 

Under the terms of the proposed 

consent decree, John M. Williams, Jr., 

Arizona Public Service Co., the Salt 

River Project, Public Service Company 

of New Mexico, El Paso Electric Co., and 

the United States Department of Interior 

will reimburse EPA in the amount of 

$462,500. EPA’s total response costs are 

approximately $1 million. 

The Department of Justice will receive 

for a period of thirty (30) days from the 

mstockstill on DSKH9S0YB1PROD with NOTICES