# + 2

(,1 1/,1(

Citation: 47 Fed. Reg. 26379 1982

Content downloaded/printed from HeinOnline (http://heinonline.org) Thu May 20 16:06:28 2010

-- Your use of this HeinOnline PDF indicates your acceptance of HeinOnline's Terms and Conditions of the license agreement available at http://heinonline.org/HOL/License

-- The search text of this PDF is generated from uncorrected OCR text.

### Federal Register / Vol. 47, No. 118 / Friday, June 18, 1982 / Rules and Regulations

information submitted to support approval ofthis application may be seen in the Dockets Management Branch (HFA-305), Food and Drug Administration, Rm.4-62, 5600Fishers Lane, Rockville, MD 20857, from 9 a.m. to 4p.m., Monday through Friday.

The Bureau ofVeterinary Medicine has determined pursuant to 21 CFR 25.24(d)(1)(i) (proposed December 11, 1979; 44 FR 71742) that this action is ofa type that does not individually or cumulatively have a significant impact

on the human environment. Therefore, neither an environmental assessment

nor an environmental impact statement is required.

This action isgoverned by the provisions of-5 U.S.C. 556 and 557 and is therefore excluded from Executive Order 12291 by section 1(a](1) ofthe Order.
List ofSubjects in 21 CFR Part558

Animal drugs; Animal feeds.

PART 558-NEW ANIMAL DRUGS FOR USE IN ANIMAL FEEDS
§558.274 [Amended]

Therefore, under the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (sec. 512(i), 82 Stat. 347 (21U.S.C. 360b(i])) and under authority delegated to the Commissioner ofFood and Drugs (21 CFR 5.10) and redelegated to the Bureau ofVeterinary Medicine (21 CFR 5.83), Part 558 is amended in § 558.274 HygromycinB by adding, in numerical sequence, drug sponsor code "050568"to paragraph (a)(4) and to the "sponsor" column in paragraph (e)(1](i) and (ii).

Effective date:June 18, 1982. (Sec.512(i), 82 Stat. 347 (21 U.S.C. 360b(i)))

Dated:June 11, 1982. Gerald B.Guest, ActingDirector, BureauofVeterinary Medicine.

[FRDce. 82-16330 Filed 6-17-82 8:45 am) BILUNG CODE 4160-41-V

21 CFR Part 558 New Animal Drugs for Use In Animal Feeds; Pyrantel Tartrate
AGENCY: Food and DrugAdministration. ACTION: Final rule.

SUMMARY: The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) is amending the animal drug regulations to reflect approval of a new animal drug application (NADA) filed for Custom Feed Blenders Corp., providing for safe and effective useof 9.6- and 19.2-gramper-pound pyrantel tartrate premixes for making complete swine feeds. EFFECTIVE DATE: June 18, 1982. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT. Charles E. Haines, Bureau ofVeterinary Medicine (HFV-138), Food and Drug Administration, 5600 Fishers Lane, Rockville, MD 20857, 301-443-3410. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Custom Feed Blenders Corp., 540 Hawkeye Ave., Fort Dodge, IA 50501, is the sponsor of NADA 129-415 submitted on its behalf by Pfizer, Inc. The NADA provides for

use ofpremixes containing 9.6 and 19.2 grams ofpyrantel tartrate perpound for making complete swine feeds used as an aid in prevention ofmigration and establishment of large roundworm (Ascarissuum) infections, and aid in prevention ofestablishment ofnodular

worm (Oesophagostomum)infections, and forremoval and control oflarge roundworm (Ascaris suum)infections. Approval ofthis application relies on safety and effectiveness data contained in Pfizer's approved NADA 43-290. Use of the data in NADA 43-290 to support this application has been authorized by Pfizer. This approval does not change the approved use ofthe drug. Consequently, approval ofthisNADA poses no increased human risk from exposure to residues ofthe animal drug,

nor does it change the conditions ofthe drug's safeuse in the target animal species. Accordingly, under the Bureau ofVeterinary Medicine's supplemental approval policy (42 FR 64367; December 23, 1977), the approval ofthisNADA has been treated as would approval of a Category II supplement and does not require reevaluation ofthe safety and effectiveness data in NADA 43-290.

In accordance with the freedom of information provisions ofPart 20 (21 CFR Part 20) and § 514.11(e)(2)(ii) (21 CFR 514.11(e](2)(ii)), a summary of safety and effectiveness data and information submitted to support approval ofthis application may be seen' in the Dockets Management Branch (HFA-305), Food and Drug Administration, Rm. 4-62, 5600 Fishers Lane, Rockville, MD 20857, from 9 a.m. to 4 p.m., Monday through Friday.

The Bureau of Veterinary Medicine has determined pursuant to 21 CFR 25.24(d)(1)(i) (proposedDecember 11, 1979;44 FR 71742) that this action is of a type that does not individually or cumulatively have a significant impact

on the human environment. Therefore, neither an environmental assessment

nor an environmental impact statement isrequired.

This action is governed by the provisions of5 U.S.C.556 and 557 and is therefore excluded from Executive Order 12291 by section 1(a)(1) ofthe Order. List ofSubjects in 21 CFR Part558

Animal drugs; Animal feeds.

PART 558-NEW ANIMAL DRUGS FOR USE IN ANIMAL FEEDS

Therefore, under theFederal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (Sec. 512(i), 82 Stat. 347 (21 U.S.C. 360b(i))) and under authority delegated to the Commissioner ofFood and Drugs (21 CFR 5.10) and redelegated to the Bureau ofVeterinary Medicine (21 CFR 5.83), Part558 is amended in § 558.485 by adding new paragraph (a)(12) to read as follows: §558.485 Pyrantel tartrate.



## (a)* * * (12) To 046987: 9.6 and 19.2 grams per pound, paragraph (e)(1) and (2) ofthis section.

* * * * *

Effective date:June 18, 1982. 

### (Sec. 512(i), 82 Stat. 347 (21 U.S.C. 360bWi)))

Dated.June 11, 1982. Gerald B.Guest, ActingDirector, BureauofVeterinary Medicine.

[FR Doc. 82-18333Filed 6-17-a2 8:46 amj
BILING CODE 4160-01-M

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION

AGENCY

40 CFR Part 52
[A-9-FRL 2142-1]
Approval and Promulgation of Implementation Plans; California State Implementation Plan Revision

AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). ACTION: Final rulemaking.

SUMMARY: Revisions torules ofthe Colusa County, Glenn County, Great Basin Unified, Humboldt County, Lake County,Mendocino County, Modoc County,Placer County, Plumas County, Shasta County, Sierra County, Siskiyou County, and Yolo-Solano Air Pollution Control Districts (APCDs)were forwarded to EPA by the State of California. These revisions generally are administrative and concern permitting procedure. EPAreviewed these rules with respect to section 110 ofthe Clean Air Act and determined that they should be approved. EFFECTIVE DATE: This action willbe effective on August 17, 1982, unless notice is received within 30 days that

someone wishes to submit adverse or critical comments. 

### 26379

HeinOnline -- 47 Fed. Reg. 26379 1982

### Federal Register / Vol. 47, No. 118 / Friday, June 18, 1982 1 Rules and Regulations

ADDRESSES: Copies 

### oftherevisions are available for public inspection during normal business hours at the following locations:
Public Information Reference Unit,

Environmental Protection Agency, Library, 401 "M" Street, SW., Room 2404, Washington, D.C. 20460. Office of the FederalRegister, 1100 "L"

Street, NW., Room 8401, Washington, D.C. 20408. California Air Resources Board, 1102 "Q"

Street, Sacramento, CA 95812. Colusa County Air Pollution Control District,

751 Fremont Street, Colusa CA 95932. Glenn CountyAir Pollution Control District,

720 NorthColusa Street, Willows, CA 95988. Great Basin Unified Air Pollution Control

District, 873 NorthMain Street, Suite 213, Bishop, CA 93514. Humboldt County AirPollution Control

District, 5600 S6uth Broadway, Eureka, CA 95501. Lake County AirPollution Control District,

255North Forbes Street, Lakeport, CA 95453. Mendocino CountyAir Pollution Control

District, Courthouse Square, Ukiah, CA 95482. Modoc County Air Pollution Control District,

202West Fourth Street, Alturas, CA96101. Placer County Health and Medical Services,

11491 BAvenue, Auburn, CA 95603. Plumas CountyAir Pollution Control District,

Courthouse Annex, Quincy, CA 95971. Shasta County AirPollution Control District,

1855 Placer Street, Redding, CA 96001. Sierra County Air PollutionControl District,

County Courthouse, Downieville, CA 95936. Siskiyou County AirPollution Control

District, 525 South Foothill Drive,Yreka, CA96097. Yolo-Solano Air Pollution Control District,

323 First Street, Suite5,Woodland, CA 95695.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Douglas Grano, Chief, State Implementation Plan Section, Air Management Division, Environmental Protection Agency, 215 Fremont Street, San Francisco, CA 94105, (415) 974-8058. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

### The Stateof California submitted the following rules and regulations on the indicated dates:
ColusaCounty February 25, 1980 Rule 2.7A-Standards for Granting

Applications Rule 2.7B.-Conditional Approval
Glenn County February 25, 1980 Section 51.1-Standards for Granting

Applications Section 51.2-Conditional Approval
GreatBasin Unified December 17, 1979 Rule 203-Applications Rule 209-A-Standards for Authorities to

Construct Rule 209-B-Standards forPermits to Operate Rule 212-Additional Information (Deletion) Rule 213-Implementation Plans

HumboldtCounty
March 23, 1981 Rule 130-Definitions Rule 200-Permit Requirements Rule 210-Environmental Assessment Rule 220-New Source Review Standards Rule 230-Action on Applications Rule 240-Permit to Operate Rule 250-Appeals Rule 260-Exclusions

Lake County
March 1, 1982 Rule 655-Performance

MendocinoCounty April 17, 1980 Rule 130-Definitions Rule 200-Permit Requirements Rule 21Q-Environmental Assessment Rule 220-New Source Review Standards Rule 230-Action on Applications Rule 240-Permit to Operate Rule 250-Appeals Rule 260--Exclusions

Modoc County
December 17, 1979 Rule 2:8-e-Standards for Permits to

Construct

Placer County August 21, 1979 (Lake Tahoe Air Basin

portion) Rule 502-Permit Exceptions Rule 503-Transfer Rule 504-Applications Rule 505-Cancellation ofAuthority to

Construct Rule 506-Action on Applications Rule 511-Revocation ofa Permit Rule 512-Appeals Rule 513-Reinstatement October 15, 1979 (Mountain Counties Air

Basin portion) Rule 501B-Permit to Operate Rule 502-Exemptions Rule 504-Applications Rule 506-Action on Applications Rule 512-Appeals Rule 513-Reinstatement

PlumasCounty
June 22, 1981 Rule 501-Permit Required Rule 502-Exemptions to Rule 501 Rule 503-Applications Rule 504-Action on Applications Rule 505-Conditional Appioval Rule 506-Denial ofApplication Rule 507-Responsibility Rule 508--Posting ofPermit to Operate Rule 509-Authority to Inspect Rule 510-Separation ofEmissions Rule 511-Combination ofEmissions Rule 517-Transfer Rule 518-Revocation ofa Permit toOperate Rule 519-Appeals Rule 520-Reinstatement Rule 521-Annual Renewal

Shasta County February 25, 1980 Rule 1:2.-Definitions Rule 2:1A.-Permits Required

SierraCounty June 22, 1981 Rule 501-Permit Required Rule 502-Exemptions to Rule 501 Rule 503-Applications Rule 504-Action on Applications Rule 505-Conditional Approval Rule 506-Denial ofApplication Rule 507-Responsibility Rule 508-Posting ofPermit to Operate Rule 509-Authority to Inspect Rule 510-Separation ofEmissions Rule 511-Combination ofEmissions Rule 517-Transfer Rule 518-Revocation ofa Permit to Operate Rule 519-Appeals Rule 520-Reinstatement Rule 521-Annual Renewal Siskiyou County October 15, 1979 Rule 2.14-Standards for Permit to Construct RuleC.15-Standards for Permit to Operate Rule 2.16-State Ambient Air Quality

Standards

Yolo-Solano February 25, 1980 Rtile 3.4.1-Standards for Granting

Applications Rule 3.4.2-Conditional Approval Rule 3.13-Public Review andComment for

Application for Authority toConstruct

Under section 110 ofthe Clean Air Act

as amended, and 40 CFR Part 51, the Administrator is required to approve or disapprove these regulations as State Implementation Plan (SIP) revisions.All the rules listed above have been evaluated and found in accordance with EPA policy and 40 CFR Part 51. Detailed 

### evaluation reports are available for public inspection at the EPA Library in, Washington, D.C. and the EPA Region 9 Office.

This notice approves all the rules revisions listed above and incorporates them into the California SIP, EPA's approval ofthe above revisions to the California SIP is being done without prior proposal because the revisions are not controversial. The public is advised that this approval action will be effective August 17, 1982. However, if notice is received by EPA within 30 days that someone wishes to submit adverse

orcritical comments, the approval action will be withdrawn and a subsequent notice will be published before the effective date.The subsequent notice will indefinitely postpone the effective date, modify the final action to a proposed action, and establish a comment period.

The Office ofManagement and Budget has exempted thisrule from the requirements of section 3 ofExecutive Order 12291. 

### 26380

HeinOnline -- 47 Fed. Reg. 26380 1982

### Federal Register 

## I Vol. 47, No. 118 / Friday, June 18, 1982 / Rules and Regulations

Under 5 U.S.C. 605(b), the Administrator has certified that SIP approvals do not have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities. (See 46 FR 8709.)

Under the Clean Air Act, any petitions for judicial review ofthis action must be filed in the United States Court of Appeals for the appropriate circuit by August 17, 1982.This action may not be challenged later in proceedings to enforce its requirements.

Incorporation by reference ofthe State Implementation Plan for the State ofCaliforna was approved by the Director ofthe Federal Register on July 1, 1981.

List ofSubjects in 40 CFR Part 52

Air pollution control, Ozone, Sulfur oxides, Nitrogen dioxide, Lead, Particulate matter, Carbon monoxide, Hydrocarbons.
(Secs. 110, and 301(a), Clean Air Act, as amended (42 U.S.C. 7410 and 7601(a)))

Dated: June 14,1982. Ann M. Gorsuch, Administrator.

PART 52-APPROVAL AND PROMULGATION OF IMPLEMENTATION PLANS

Subpart Fof Part 52 ofChapter 1,Title 40 ofthe Code ofFederal Regulations is amended as follows:
Subpart F-California

1. Section 52.220 is amended by adding paragraphs (c)(52) (xiii)(D) and (xxi), (54)(iv)(C), (x), (xi), and (xii), (58)(iii)(B) and (ix), (80)(i)(C), (93)(iii), and (iv), (95)(vi), (119)(ii), and (121)(iii)
to read as follows: §52.220 Identification of plan.



### (c) * * * (52) * * * (xiii) * * * (D) New or amended Rules 5011, 502, 504, 506, 512, and 513.

* * * * *€

(xxi) Siskiyou CountyAPCD. (A) New oramended Rules 2.14-2.16,

* * * * *

(54) * * * (iv) * * * (C) New or amended Rules 3.13, 3.4.1, and 3.4.2.

* * * * *

(x) Colusa County APCD. (A) New or amended Rules 2.7 A and B. (xi) Glenn County APCD. (A)New or amended Rules 51.1 and 51.2. (xii) Shasta County APCD. (A) New or amended Rules 1:2 (Best Available Control Technology, Stationary Source and Precursor) and 2:1 A.

(58) * * * (iii) * * * (B) New or amended Rules 203, 209-A and B, 212, and 213.

* * * * *

(ix)Modoc County APCD. (A)New or amended Rule 2:8-e.

(80) * * * 

## i) * * * (C) New or amended Rules 502-506 and 511-513.

* * * * *

(93) * * * (iii) Plumas County APCD. (B) New or amended Rules 501-511 and 517-521.

(iv) * * * (B) New or amended Rules 501-511 and 517-521.

(95) * * * (vi) Humboldt County APCD. (A) New or amended Rules 130, 200, 210, 220, 230, 240, 250, and260.

• * * * *

(119) * * * (ii) Mendocino County APCD. (A)New or amended Rules 130, 200, 210, 220, 230, 240, 250, and 260.

* * * * *

(121) * * * (iii) Lake CountyAPCD. (A) New or amended Rule 655.

lFR Doc. 82-10492 Filed6-17-82 8:45 amJ
BILUNG CODE 6560-50-M

40 CFR Part 52
[A-3-FRL2137-7]
Approval of Revision ofthe Maryland State Implementation Plan

AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency. ACTION: Final rule.

SUMMARY: The purpose ofthis notice is to approve a revision to the Maryland State Implementation Plan (SIP)which

- was submitted on August 11, 1981. The public hearing on thesechanges, which include new iron and steel industry regulations, was held on July 15, 1981. Thisrevision consists ofnew iron and steel regulations. This notice also
approves complementary changes to the definitions, the general emission regulations, and .technicalmemoranda relating to test procedures. In addition, the notice approves a new technical memorandum specifying the procedures for observing and evaluating visible emissions and a new Amended Plan for Compliance (PFC) for the Bethlehem Steel Corporation's Sparrows Point, Maryland plant.These amendments satisfy a condition ofapproval ofthe Part D plan for attainment ofthe primary total suspended particulate standard. EFFECTIVE DATE: July 19, 1982. ADDRESSES: Copies ofthis SIPrevision and the accompanying support documents are available for inspection during normal business hours at the following offices:
U.S.Environmental Protection Agency,

Region III, Air Programs Branch, Curtis Building, Tenth Floor, Sixth & Walnut Streets, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19106, ATTN: Patricia Sheridan Maryland Department ofHealth &

Mental Hygiene, Air Management Administration, 201 W. Preston Street, Baltimore, Maryland 21201, ATTN: George P.Ferreri Public Information Reference Unit,

Room 2922, EPA Library, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, 401 M Street, SW., Washington, D.C. 20460 FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT. Mr. Harold A. Frankford (3AW12), U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Region III, Sixth &Walnut Streets, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19106, telephone: 215/597-8392. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Background

On August 11, 1981, the Governor of the State ofMaryland submitted amended regulations as a revisionto the Maryland State Implementation Plan. This revision, identified by Maryland as Revision 81-03, includes State-initiated changes as well as new Code of Maryland Air Regulations (COMAR 10.18.10) and a new Amended Plan for Compliance (PFC) for the Bethlehem Steel Corporation, Sparrows PointPlant. The State adopted these regulations to satisfy a condition ofapproval of the Part D plan (46FR 45341, Sept. 11, 1981). Apublic hearing on the PFC and the amended regulations was held on July 15, 1981 in Baltimore, Maryland. The regulations were adopted on August 11, 1981 andbecame effective State regulations on October 10, 1981. These amendments and the PFC have been developed and submitted in accordance 

### 26381

HeinOnline -- 47 Fed. Reg. 26381 1982

### Federal Register] Vol. 47, No. 118 / Friday, June 18, 1982 / Rules and Regulations

with therequirements ofTitle 40, Code ofFederal Regulations, Part51. Description ofRevision/Solicitation of Public Comments

The February 2,1982notice of proposed rulemaking, 47 FR4704, describes themajor elements ofthe State's SIPrevision as well as the chronology ofevents leading up to the State's August 11, 1981 submittal.

This notice also solicited public comments on EPA's proposed rulemaking action. However, during the comment period provided by thisnotice and a February 9, 1982 correction notice, 47 FR5912,no comments were received.
EPA Evaluation

EPA has reviewed the revision submitted by Maryland and finds thatit satisfies the condition ofthe approval of the Part DSIP.During thereview ofthe revision, EPAidentified four items which required clarification by the State ofMaryland. The State responded to these items in a letter dated October 28, 1981. These issues are discussed below:

1.EPArequested thatthe State of Maryland clarify whether the intent underlying COMAR 10.18.10.03 is that 

### the novisible emission standard applies to argon-oxygen decarbonization vessels.

Maryland responded that it is the intent ofthe State ofMaryland that COMAR 10.18.10.03A(1), which requires 

### no-visible emissions otherthan water in

an uncombined form, applies to the two buildings inArea III ofthe State which contain argon-oxygen decarbonization vessels.

2.EPA, in its review, questioned ifthe "reasonable control methods" required in COMAR 10.18.10.04B(2) (a), 1b), (e), and (h) were in place and being employed and,ifso,were the standards in COMAR 10.18.10.03B (1), (2), (4), and 

### (5)effective and enforceable immediately.

Maryland responded that the Bethlehem Steel Corporation, Sparrows PointPlant is presently in compliance with COMAR 10.18.10.04B(2) (a), (b), (e) and (h). The "reasonable control methods" required by these regulations

are inplace, and the visible emission requirements ofCOMAR 10.18.10.03B (1), (2), (4), and (5)were in effect as of October 10, 1981 theregulation's effective date.

3.EPAnoted that the PFC delays enforceability ofthe mass emission standard for coke oven combustion stacks due toproblems with the current test method. TheAgency requested that Maryland assure EPAin writing that alternate testing procedures developed for theparticulate sampling method be submitted as a SIPrevision no later than December 31, 1982.

Maryland pointed outthat the PFC calls foran alternative test procedure for theparticulate sampling method at the coke oven combustion stacks to be finalized by December 31, 1982.The State ofMaryland anticipates no problem at thepresent time complying with this requirement and intends to submit the final testprocedures toEPA

as a SIP revision as soon as the procedure is finalized.This Is expected to be prior to December 31, 1982.

4. EPA's review revealed that the PFC allows the development ofan alternate visible emission standard forthe Basic Oxygen Furnaces (BOF)when reasonable controls arein place. It also Indicates that the installation may occur in two stages. The Agency has informed the State that an interim visible emission standard mustbe developed for the first stage.

Maryland stated that thePFC provides that the Department could require additional controls at the BOF Shop, beyond those presently required in the PFC, to beutilized by December 31, 1982. Should this occur, the State of Maryland commits to develop an interim visible emission standard forthe BOF Shop and to submit it to EPAas a SIP revision no later than December 31, 1983.
EPA Actions

Based upon the above evaluations, the Administrator approves the new iron and steel regulation (COMAR 10.18.10), the new Technical Memorandum AMATM 81-04, the new Method 13 to be added to AMA-TM 73-116, the amended COMAR 10.18.01 and COMAR 10.18.06, and the Amended Plan for Compliance (considering the above necessary changes) for the Bethlehem Steel. Corporation's Sparrows Point, Maryland plant.Accordingly, this notice amends 40 CFR 52.1070 (Identification ofPlan)of Subpart V (Maryland) to incorporate the documents submitted by Maryland as part ofRevision 81-03 intothe Maryland SIP.This notice also removes 40 CFR 52.1075 (Conditional Approvals) as the State ofMaryland has now satisfied all of the conditions under which EPA had approved Maryland's 1979 PartDSIP.

The Office ofManagement and Budget has exempted thisrule from the requirements of Section 3ofExecutive Order 12291.



### Under 5U.S.C. 605(b), Ihave certified that SIP approvals do not have a significant economic impact on a substantial number ofsmall entities. (See 46 FR 8709.)

Under section 307(b)(1) of the Act, petitions forjudicial review of this action mustbe filed in the United States Court ofAppeals for the appropriate circuit by August 17, 1982. Thisaction may not be challenged later in proceedings to enforce its requirements. (See 307(b)(2))

ListofSubjects in40 CFRPart52



### Air pollution control, Ozone, Sulfur oxides,Nitrogen dioxide, Lead, Particulate matter, Carbonmonoxide, Hydrocarbons.

Dated: June 14, 1982. Anne M. Gorsuch, Administrator.

Note.-Incorporation by reference of the State Implementation Plan for the State of Maryland was approved by theDirector of theFederal Register onJuly 1,1981.


### PART52-APPROVAL AND PROMULGATION OF IMPLEMENTATION PLANS

Title 40,Part 52, Subpart V, of the 

### Code ofFederal Regulations is amended

as follows: Subpart V-Maryland

1. In §52.1070, paragraph (c)(67) is added toread as follows: 

### §52.1070 Identification ofplan.



### (c)* * * (67) Code ofMaryland Air Regulations (COMAR) 10.18.10 (Control ofIron and Steel Production Installations); Technical Memorandum AMA-TM 81- 

### 04: Amendment to AMA-TM 73-116; Amendments to COMAR 10.18.01.01 (General Administrative RegulationsDefinitions) and COMAR 10.18.06.02 (General Emission Standards, Prohibitions and Restriction); and a New 

### Amended Planfor Compliance for the Bethlehem Steel Corporation's Sparrows Point, Maryland Plant; submitted on August 11, 1981 bythe Governor. 

### §52.1075 (Removed andreserved]

2. Section 52.1075 is removed and reserved.

1FR

Dec. 82-16544 Filed 6-17-82; 8:45am]

BILLING CODE S560-0-M



### 40 CFR Part 52
[A-9-FRL 2139-7]] Approval and Promulgation of Implementation Plans;Arizona State Implementation Plan Revision

AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency. ACTION: Notice offinal rulemaking. 

### 26382

HeinOnline -- 47 Fed. Reg. 26382 1982