Private and Confidential

Matthew E. Barnes (Horizon Drones, LLC), Titusville, FL - Section 333 Exemption Petition

02/29/2016

U. S. Department of Transportation Docket Management System

1200 New Jersey Ave,

SE Washington, DC 20590

Re: Exemption Request Section 333 of the FAA Reform Act of the Federal Aviation Regulations

from 14 C.F.R. 45.23(b); 14 C.F.R. Part 21; 14 C.F.R. 61.113(a)&(b); 91.7(a); 91.9(b) (2);

91.103(b); 91.109; 119.121; 91.151(a); 91.203(a)&(b); 91.405(a); 91.407(a) (1); 91.409(a) (2);

91.417(a)&(b)

Dear Sir or Madam, I, Matthew E. Barnes (Horizon Drones, LLC), am writing pursuant

to the FAA Modernization and Reform Act of 2012 and the procedures contained within 14

C.F.R. 11, to request that I, Matthew E. Barnes (Horizon Drones, LLC), an owner and

operator of small unmanned aircraft, be exempted from the Federal Aviation Regulations

(“FARs”) listed below so that I, Matthew E. Barnes (Horizon Drones, LLC), may operate

my small ultra lightweight unmanned aircraft system (“UAS”) in commercially regulated

airspace by the Federal Aviation Administration (“FAA”).

Following exemption and approval by the FAA, I, Matthew E. Barnes (Horizon Drones, LLC), will primarily use my professionally built DJI Inspire 1 and DJI Phantom 3 UAS equipped with

cameras for the following applications: Closed-Set Film Operations on Film and Television

Productions, as well as aerial videography/cinematography to safely enhance films and

commercials; augmentation of real estate listing videos; and the creation of visual and

topography layout videos for Search and Rescue (SAR) missions for state and local agencies,

education, agricultural inspections and building and construction zone inspections.

My, Matthew E. Barnes (Horizon Drones, LLC)’s, exemption request would permit the

operation of ultra lightweight, unmanned (i.e. piloted by remote control) UAS’s for the
2

2

development of community and government use videos, permissible within property

boundaries for individual homeowners and within in tightly controlled, limited airspaces

predetermined in areas away from the general public, airports, heliports and vehicular traffic.

Currently, similar lightweight, remote controlled UAS's are legally operated by unmonitored

amateur hobbyists with no safety plan or controls in place to prevent catastrophe. Furthermore, it

is my intent to assist future FAA safety protocols and regulations exclusive to lightweight UAS's

for specific video and photography usage by sharing information with the FAA as I, Matthew E.

Barnes (Horizon Drones, LLC), record flight data and other pertinent information gained

through permitted flight operations.

In addition, granting my, Matthew E. Barnes (Horizon Drones, LLC)’s, exemption

request will comply with the Secretary of Transportation’s (FAA Administrator’s) instructions to

not only integrate UAS's into the national airspace system, but to “...establish requirements for

the safe operation of such aircraft systems [UAS's] in the national airspace system” under

Section 333(c) of the Reform Act specific to the use of UAS's for real estate/Realtor purposes,

educational videos, Search and Rescue, land/trusts inspections, agricultural field monitoring,

film/video productions, closed-set motion picture film operations and television, and structure

inspections, to aid state and local agencies.

Further I, Matthew E. Barnes (Horizon Drones, LLC), will conduct my operations in compliance

with the protocols described herein or as otherwise established by the FAA.

For the reasons stated below, I, Matthew E. Barnes (Horizon Drones, LLC), respectfully

request the grant of an exemption allowing me to operate ultra lightweight, remote controlled

UAS’s to aid academic community awareness, to benefit/stimulate attraction to the metro

Space Coast area and to enhance personal and public video feeds. A grant that will ultimately

allow UAS’s to play a more positive role in our local community by increasing employment

opportunities, heightening security measures and decreasing government expenditures by

reducing the need for heavier manned aircraft, containing costly, combustible fuel- a potential

public hazard in and of itself.

I. Contact Information:

Matthew E. Barnes

Horizon Drones, LLC

Titusville, FL 32796

Phone: 904-674-4698

Email: horizondrones@yahoo.com
3

3

II. The Specific Sections of Title 14 of the Code of Federal Regulations from Which

Matthew E. Barnes (Horizon Drones, LLC) Requests Exemption are:

14 CFR 21; 14 C.F.R. 45.23(b);

14 CFR 61.113 (a) & (b);

14 C.F.R. 91, et seq.;

14 CFR 407 (a) (1);

14 CFR 409 (a) (2); and,

14 CFR 417 (a) & (b).

III. The Extent of relief Matthew E. Barnes (Horizon Drones, LLC) Seeks and the

Reason He Seeks Such Relief:

I, Matthew E. Barnes (Horizon Drones, LLC), submit this application in

accordance with the Reform Act, 112 P.L. 95 §§ 331-334, seeking relief from any

currently applicable FARs operating to prevent me, Matthew E. Barnes (Horizon Drones, LLC), contemplated commercial cinematic, academic and other flight operations within the national

airspace system. The Reform Act in Section 332 provides for such integration of civil unmanned

aircraft systems into our national airspace system as it is in the public’s interest to do so. My,

Matthew E. Barnes (Horizon Drones, LLC)’s, ultra lightweight UAS meets the definition of

“small

unmanned aircraft” as defined in Section 331 and therefore the integration of my ultra light

weight UAS is expressly contemplated by the Reform Act. I would like to operate my ultra

lightweight UAS prior to the time period by which the Reform Act requires the FAA to promulgate

rules governing such craft. Thereby, providing direct experience and valuable information for

formal regulation that can be administered uniformly to all related UAS aerial video and

photography. The Reform Act guides the Secretary in determining the types of UAS's that may

operate safely in our national airspace system. Considerations include: The weight, size, speed

and overall capabilities of the UAS's; Whether the UAS will be operated near airports or heavily

populated areas; and, Whether the UAS will be operated by line of sight. 112 P.L. 95 § 333 (a).

Each of these items reflect in favor of an exemption for me, Matthew E. Barnes (Horizon

Drones, LLC). My UAS’s utilize eight (8) or less rotating propellers for balance, control and

stability. My UAS’s are equipped with the following via video and data telemetry:

1) Altimeter

2) Attitude indicator

3) Ground Speed indicator

4) Magnetic compass

5) Heading indicator
4

4

6) Vertical speed indicator

7) Course deviation indicator

8) Radio magnetic indicator

9) GPS location

10) Battery consumption and Battery Left with approximate time.

11) Loiter and circle mode.

12) Auto safety or RTL (Return To Launch)

13) Auto landing technology.

Each UAS weighing less than thirty five (35) pounds (far below the maximum 55 pound limit);

Including camera(s) with or without gimbal (a camera stabilizer). I, Matthew E. Barnes (Horizon

Drones, LLC), considers safety as foremost with each flight. My small unmanned

aircraft is designed to hover in place, circle in a specific place or loiter via GPS

and can be operated in winds up to 30.4 knots (35mph) wind. For safety, stability and fear of

financial loss I will not fly in winds exceeding 21.7 knots (25 mph). Built in safety systems

include a GPS mode that allows my UAS to hover/circle in place or land when radio controls

are released.

With three (3) modes to choose from, I will fly with the modes safest to complete the videos for

aerial videography/photography and have the ability to choose the safest, most reliable and

stable mode to prevent accident and hazard. When pilot communication from the radio

control is lost, UAS is designed slowly descend to point of takeoff and or to land at point of

launch after ascending to a pre-set altitude to ensure the UAS will clear any obstacles that

may be between the takeoff point and the current position of the UAS. This failsafe altitude

will not be set more than 200ft and is determined before each flight.

I, Matthew E. Barnes (Horizon Drones, LLC), will not operate my UAS near airports, hospitals

nor police heliports, and do not operate near areas where general public is within fifty to one

hundred (50-100) yards depending on location, conditions and weather. I am constantly on alert

for any manned aircraft (police/medical helicopters, etc.) and prepared to land/abort immediately

to the nearest and safest ground point should a manned aircraft approach my location or I

suspect manned aircraft may approach near my location. My UAS’s are capable of vertical and

horizontal operations, and is flown only within my line of sight, as the remote control pilot. My

UAS's are also flown with a second operator who aids in watching for any obstacles, including

manned aircraft, within the flight zone of the UAS. Utilizing battery power rather than combustible

fuels, flights generally last between three (10) to fifteen (25) minutes, with an altitude under one

hundred fifty (150) feet. (3)Smart Mode includes, position hold, self-leveling, altitude command,
5

5

GPS, return home feature, and safety control to return home or land in the event of

communication interruption between RC transmitter and UAS.

I, Matthew E. Barnes (Horizon Drones, LLC), utilize a fresh fully charged battery with

each flight as a safety precaution; full flight time limit for each battery is eight (8) to thirty (30)

minutes as tested. I do not operate my UAS at or below manufacturer recommend minimum

charge levels for operation; preferring to remain well within a safe operating range to insure

adequate communication between radio control and UAS to eliminate potential for crash, loss of

control or hazard. Reserve batteries are at hand with each exercise to insure replacement for

sufficient safe level of operation. I do not believe in taking risk that may cause a crash that could

create hazard to the public/property/manned aircraft, and have no desire to lose an investment. I

have clocked numerous practice flights in remote areas as a hobbyist simulating flights for future

commercial use to gain familiarization with the characteristics of this specific UAS's performance

under different temperature and weather conditions. I also practice computerized simulated

flights to maintain adequate skills and response reflex time. All for the sake of safety.

I, Matthew E. Barnes (Horizon Drones, LLC), am extremely cautious when operating of

my UAS/ultra lightweight unmanned aircraft and will not “create a hazard to users of the national

airspace system or the public.” 112 P.L. 95 § 333 (b). Given the small size and weight of my UAS

it falls well within Congress’s contemplated safety zone when it promulgated the Reform Act and

the corresponding directive to integrate UAS's into the national airspace system. Matthew E.

Barnes (Horizon Drones, LLC)’s UAS, used in hobby flight, has a demonstrable safety record

and does not pose any threat to the general public or national security.

IV. How Matthew E. Barnes (Horizon Drones, LLC)’s Request Will Benefit the

Public as A Whole: Aerial videography for geographical awareness, education, search and

rescue, land management, structure inspections and for real estate marketing has been around

for a long time through manned fixed wing aircraft and helicopters. For small budget companies,

average homeowners and property owners the expense of such aerial videography is cost

prohibitive. Only large companies and high end Realtors or luxury homeowners can afford to

absorb such expense; depriving non-luxury owners and lower budget companies from a valuable

marketing tool. Manned aircraft pose a threat to the public through potential catastrophic crash

that the Titusville community has experienced in the past with military aircraft, medical

helicopters, and news helicopters crashes within the city of Titusville. Each resulting in loss of

life.

Each with combustible fuel that exploded and burned on impact. Police helicopters have

made emergency hard landings within city limits. My, Matthew E. Barnes (Horizon Drones,

LLC)'s, UAS poses no such threat since size and lack of combustible fuel

alleviates any potential threat to the public. Congress has already proclaimed that it is in the

public’s interest to integrate commercially flown UAS's into the national airspace system,

hence the passing of the Reform Act. Granting my, Matthew E. Barnes (Horizon Drones,

LLC)’s, exemption request furthers the public interest through academic/visual
6

6

awareness of the geographical benefits in and around the metro Space Coast area. My ultra

light weight UAS is battery powered and creates no emissions that can harm the environment.

The consequence of my ultra light weight UAS crashing is far less than a full size helicopter or

fixed wing aircraft; which are heavy, contain combustible fuel and can cause catastrophic

devastation to the public. The public’s interest is furthered by minimizing ecological and crash

threat by permitting aerial video/photo capture through my battery operated ultra lightweight

UAS's.

Permitting me, Matthew E. Barnes (Horizon Drones, LLC), to immediately fly within

national air space furthers economic growth. Granting my exemption request substantially

furthers the economic impact for the metro Space Coast area and surrounding community for

companies looking to relocate or build around the Space Coast metro area as well as individuals

looking to relocate for career advancement through academic and geographical awareness.

Both of which serve as a stimulus to the community.

V. Reasons Why Matthew E. Barnes (Horizon Drones, LLC)’s Exemption

Will Not Adversely Affect Safety or How the Exemption Will Provide a Level of Safety At

Least Equal To Existing Rule: My, Matthew E. Barnes (Horizon Drones, LLC)’s, exemption will

not adversely affect safety. Quite the contrary, for the reasons stated permitting me, Matthew E.

Barnes (Horizon Drones, LLC), to log more flight time in FAA controlled airspace, with

communication with the FAA, will allow me to contribute to the innovation and implementation of

new and novel, as of yet undiscovered safety protocols for Realtors, land and structured owners.

For development in cooperation with the FAA. In addition I, Matthew E. Barnes (Horizon

Drones, LLC), submit the following representations of enhancements to current aerial

videography and photography: My UAS’s weigh less than seven (7) pounds complete with a an

integrated ultra-light weight camera.; I only operate my UAS below 200 feet (well within the 400

foot permissible ceiling set by the FAA Modernization and Reform Act of 2012); My UAS only

operate for 3-30 minutes per flight; I land my UAS prior to manufacturer recommended minimum

level of battery power; I pilot my UAS through remote control only by line of sight; and have live

video feed for a secondary pilot to monitor video recording; I receive a live telemetry feed from

my UAS during all flights which include remaining battery voltage, distance, altitude, and any

anomalies that may occur during flight;

My UAS’s Command and Control utilizes spread spectrum 2.4Ghz-2.485Ghz frequencies in

accordance with CFR 47, Part 15 for model aircraft use.

My UAS’s camera system utilizes 5.725Ghz-5.875Ghz frequencies in accordance with CFR 47,

Part 15.

My UAS’s have a GPS controlled flight controller- a flight safety feature whereby it hovers or

circles and then lands at the GPS takeoff point if communication with the remote control pilot

is lost; I actively record and analyze flight data through the DJI Inspire 1 and DJI phantom 3 flight

controller app to constantly update and enhance safety protocols; I only operate in reasonably

safe environment that are strictly controlled, are away from power lines, elevated lights, airports

and actively populated areas; I conduct extensive preflight inspections and protocol, during

which safety carries primary importance; I always obtain all necessary permissions prior to
7

7

operation; and, I have procedures in place to abort flights in the event of safety breaches or

potential danger. My, Matthew E. Barnes (Horizon Drones, LLC)’s, safety protocols provide a

level of safety equal to or exceeding existing rules. It is important to note that absent the

integration of commercial UAS into our national airspace system, helicopters are the primary

means of aerial video and photography for community awareness real estate, structured

inspections, land management and search and rescue. While the safety record of such

helicopters is remarkably astounding, there has been local incident involving loss of life as well

as extensive property damage; it is far safer to operate a battery powered ultra lightweight UAS.

First, the potential loss of life is diminished because UAS's carry no people on board and I only

operate my UAS in specific areas away from mass populations. Second, there is no fuel on

board a UAS and thus the potential for fire or explosions is greatly diminished. Third, the small

size and extreme maneuverability of my UAS allow me to remotely pilot away from and avoid

hazards quickly and safely. Lastly, given its small size and weight, even when close enough to

capture amazing images, my UAS need not be so close to the objects they are focused on

through the technology and use of post editing software allowing pan and zoom. Accordingly, my

UAS has been experimentally operated for familiarization/competency and will continue to

operate at and above current safety levels.

VI. A Summary the FAA May Publish in the Federal Register:

14 C.F.R. 21 and 14 C.F.R. 91: Airworthiness Certificates, Manuals and the Like.

14 C.F.R. 21, Subpart H, entitled Airworthiness Certificates, sets forth requirements for

procurement of necessary airworthiness certificates in relation to FAR §91.203(a)(1). The

size, weight and enclosed operational area of my, Matthew E. Barnes (Horizon Drones, LLC)’s,

UAS permits exemption from Part 21 because my UAS meets (and exceeds) an equivalent level

of safety pursuant to Section 333 of the Reform Act. The FAA is authorized to exempt aircraft

from the airworthiness certificate requirement under both the Act (49 U.S.C. § 44701 (f)) and

Section 333 of the Reform Act. Both pieces of legislation permit the FAA to exempt UAS's from

the airworthiness certificate requirement in consideration of the weight, size, speed,

maneuverability and proximity to areas such as airports and dense populations. My, Matthew E.

Barnes (Horizon Drones, LLC)’s, current and projected UAS's meet or exceed each of the

elements.

14 C.F.R. 91.7(a) prohibits the operation of an aircraft without an airworthiness certificate. As no

such certificate will be applicable in the form contemplated by the FARs, this Regulation is

inapplicable.

14 C.F.R. § 91.9 (b) (2) requires an aircraft flight manual in the aircraft. As there are no on board

pilots or passengers, and given the size of the UAS's, this Regulation is inapplicable. An

equivalent level of safety will be achieved by maintaining a safety/flight manual delineating areas

of where safety can be defined.

The FAA has previously issued exemptions to this regulation in Exemption Nos. 8607, 8737,

8738, 9299, 9299A, 9565, 9565B, 10167, 10167A, 10602, 10700 and 32827.
8

8

14 C.F.R. § 91.121 regarding altimeter settings is inapplicable insofar as my UAS utilizes

electronic global positioning systems with a barometric sensor or controlled GPS “geofencing”

14 C.F.R. § 91.203 (a) and (b) provides for the carrying of civil aircraft certifications and

registrations. They are inapplicable for the same reasons described above. The equivalent level

of safety will be achieved by maintaining any such required certifications and registrations by me,

Matthew E. Barnes (Horizon Drones, LLC). B. 14 C.F.R. § 45.23: Marking of the Aircraft. Applicable Codes of Federal Regulation require

aircraft to be marked according to certain specifications. My UAS can be marked with the

appropriate “N” number once this “N” number has been given.

C. 14 C.F.R. § 61.113: Private Pilot Privileges and Limitations: PIC. Pursuant to 14 C.F.R. §§

61.113 (a) & (b), private pilots are limited to non-commercial operations. I, Matthew E. Barnes

(Horizon Drones, LLC), The sUAS Pilot in Command must possess at least a sport pilot

certificate and a driver's license. The PIC must also meet the flight review requirements specified

in 14 CFR § 61.56 in which the PIC is rated on his/her pilot certificate as outlined in 14 C.F.R. §

61.

D. 14 C.F.R. 91.119: Minimum Safe Altitudes. 14 C.F.R. § 91.119 prescribes safe altitudes for

the operation of civil aircraft. It allows helicopters to be operated at lower altitudes in certain

conditions. My UAS will never operate at an altitude greater than 300fclose AGL; safely below

the standard of 400 AGL. I, Matthew E. Barnes (Horizon Drones, LLC), will however operate

my UAS in safe areas away from public and traffic, providing a level of safety at least equivalent

to or below those in relation to minimum safe altitudes. Given the size, weight, maneuverability

and speed of my UAS, an equivalent or higher level of safety will be achieved.

E. 14 C.F.R. 91.405 (a); 407 (a) (1); 409 (a) (2); 417(a) & (b): Maintenance Inspections.1,2,

Manual

The above-cited Regulations require, amongst other things, aircraft owners and operators to

“have [the] aircraft inspected as prescribed in subpart E of this part and shall between required

inspections, except as provided in paragraph (c) of this section, have discrepancies repaired as

prescribed in part 43 of this chapter. . . .”These Regulations only apply to aircraft with an

airworthiness certificate. They will not, therefore, apply to my, Matthew E. Barnes (Horizon

Drones, LLC)'s, UAS. However, as a safety precaution I inspect my UAS before and after each

flight.

A Summary The FAA May Publish in the Federal Register: A. 14 C.F.R. 21 and 14 C.F.R. 91:

Airworthiness Certificates, Manuals and The Like. 14 C.F.R. 21, Subpart H, entitled

Airworthiness Certificates, sets forth requirements for procurement of necessary airworthiness

certificates in relation to FAR § 91.203(a)(1). The size, weight and enclosed operational area
9

9

of my UAS permits exemption from Part 21 because my, Matthew E. Barnes (Horizon Drones,

LLC)’s, UAS meets an equivalent level of safety pursuant to Section 333 of the

Reform Act. The FAA is authorized to exempt aircraft from the airworthiness certificate

requirement under both the Act (49 U.S.C. § 44701 (f)) and Section 333 of the Reform Act.

Both pieces of legislation permit the FAA to exempt UAS's from the airworthiness certificate

requirement in consideration of the weight, size, speed, maneuverability and proximity to

areas such as airports and dense populations. My UAS meets or exceeds each of the

elements. 14 C.F.R. 91.7(a) prohibits the operation of an aircraft without an airworthiness

certificate. As no such certificate will be applicable in the form contemplated by the FARs, this

Regulation is inapplicable. 14 C.F.R. § 91.9 (b) (2) requires an aircraft flight manual in the

aircraft. As there are no pilots or passengers, and given the size of the UAS's, this Regulation

is inapplicable. An equivalent level of safety will be achieved by maintaining a manual. The

FAA has previously issued exemptions to this regulation in Exemption Nos. 8607, 8737, 8738,

9299, 9299A, 9565, 9565B, 10167, maintenance program that involves regular software

updates and curative measures for any damaged hardware. Therefore, an equivalent level of

safety will be achieved. In summary, Matthew E. Barnes (Horizon Drones, LLC) seeks

an exemption from the following Regulations:14 C.F.R. 21, subpart H; 14 C.F.R. 45.23(b); 14

C.F.R. §§ 61.113 (a) & (b); 14 C.F.R. §91.7 (a); 14 C.F.R. § 91.9 (b)(2); 14 C.F.R. § 91.103(b);

14 C.F.R. § 91.109; 14 C.F.R. §91.119; 14 C.F.R. § 91.121; 14 C.F.R. § 91.151(a); 14 C.F.R.

§§ 91.203(a) and (b); 14 C.F.R. § 91.405 (a); 14 C.F.R. § 91.407 (a)(1); 14 C.F.R. § 91.409 (a)

(2); 14 C.F.R. § 91.409 (a ) (2); and, 14 C.F.R. §§ 91.417 (a) & (b) to commercially operate my,

Matthew E. Barnes (Horizon Drones, LLC)'s, small unmanned vehicle/lightweight unmanned

aircraft vehicle in community awareness, education, structural inspection land management,

search and rescue and real estate operations, and to develop economic platforms for the

aforementioned to enhance the experience of those seeking to relocate,

rebuild, reevaluate and to find in the metro Space Coast area.

F. Additional FAA Required Operating Conditions and Limitations

When not covered elsewhere in this Operations Manual, the following conditions and

limitations apply:

1. The UA must weigh less than 55 pounds (25kg), including energy source(s)

and equipment

2. The UA may not be flown at a speed exceeding a ground speed of 85 knots.
10

10

3. Flights must be operated at an altitude of no more than 500 feet above ground

level (AGL), as indicated by the procedures specified in the operator's manual. All

altitudes reported to ATC must be in feet AGL.

4. The UAS must be operated within visual line of sight (VLOS) of the PIC at all times.

This requires the PIC to be able to use human vision unaided by any device other

than corrective lenses, as specified on the PIC's state driver’s license.

5. All operations must utilize a visual observer (VO). The VO may be used to satisfy

the VLOS requirement, as long as the PIC always maintains VLOS capability. The VO

and PIC must be able to communicate verbally at all times.

6. If a discrepancy exists between these limitations and any procedure outlined elsewhere

in this operations manual, the conditions and limitations herein take precedence and

must be followed.

7. Prior to each flight, the PIC must inspect the UAS to ensure it is in a condition for safe

flight. If the inspection reveals a condition that affects the safe operation of the UAS,

the aircraft is prohibited from operating until the necessary maintenance has been

performed and the UAS is found to be in a condition for safe flight. The Ground Control

Station, if utilized, must be included in the preflight inspection. All maintenance and

alterations must be properly documented in the aircraft records.

8. Any UAS that has undergone maintenance or alterations that affect the UAS

operation or flight characteristics, e.g. replacement of a flight critical component, must

undergo a functional test flight in accordance with the operator's manual. The PIC who

conducts the functional test flight must make an entry in the UAS aircraft records of the

flight.

9. The operator must follow the manufacturer's UAS aircraft/component, maintenance,

overhaul, replacement, inspection, and life limit requirements. When unavailable, aircraft

maintenance/component/overhaul, replacement, and inspection/maintenance

requirements must be established and identified in the operator's manual. At a minimum,

the following must be included in the operator's manual:

a. Actuators / Servos

b. Transmission (single rotor)

c. Powerplant (motors)

d. Propellers
11

11

e. Electronic speed controller

f. Batteries

g. Mechanical dynamic components (single rotor)

h. Remote command and control

i. Ground control station (if used)

j. Any other components as determined by the operator

10. The Pilot in Command (PIC) must possess at least a sport pilot certificate and at least a

current state driver’s license. The PIC must also meet the flight review requirements

specified in 14 CFR § 61.56 in an aircraft in which the PIC is rated on his/her pilot

certificate.

11. Prior to operations conducted for the purpose of motion picture filming (or similar

operations), the PIC must have accumulated and logged, in a manner consistent with 14

CFR § 61.51 (b), a minimum of 200 flight cycles and 25 hours of total time as a UAS

rotorcraft pilot and at least ten hours logged as a UAS pilot with a similar UAS type (single

blade or multirotor). Prior documented flight experience that was obtained in compliance

with applicable regulations may satisfy this requirement. Training, proficiency, and

experience-building flights can also be conducted under this grant of exemption to

accomplish the required flight cycles and flight time. During training, proficiency, and

experience-building flights, all persons not essential for flight operations are considered

non-participants, and the PIC must operate the UAS with appropriate distance from

non-participants in accordance with 14 CFR § 91.119.

12. Prior to operations conducted for the purpose of motion picture filming (or similar

operations), the PIC must have accumulated and logged, in a manner consistent with 14

CFR § 61.51 (b), a minimum of five hours as UAS pilot operating the make and model of UAS to

be utilized for operations under the exemption and three take-offs and three landings in the

preceding 90 days. Training, proficiency, experience-building, and take-off and landing currency

flights can be conducted under this grant of exemption to accomplish the required flight time and

90 day currency. During training, proficiency, experience-building, and take-off and landing

currency flights, all persons not essential for flight operations are considered non-participants,

and the PIC must operate the UAS with appropriate distance from non-participants in

accordance with 14 CFR § 91.119.
12

12

13. Prior to any flight operations authorized by this grant of exemption, the PIC and visual

observer (VO) must have successfully completed a qualification process, as outlined in

the operator’s manual. As this is a requirement stipulated by the operator, the test must be

developed and implemented by a qualified person designated at the sole discretion of the

operator. A record of completion of this qualification process must be documented and made

available to the Administrator upon request.

14. Prior to operations conducted for the purpose of motion picture filming (or similar

operations), a flight demonstration, administered by an operator-approved and -qualified pilot

must be successfully completed and documented. This documentation must be available for

review upon request by the Administrator. Because the knowledge and airmanship test

qualifications have been developed by the operator, and there are no established practical test

standards that support a jurisdictional FAA FSDO evaluation and approval of company

designated examiners, the petitioner will conduct these tests in accordance with the operator’s

manual.

15. The UAS may not be operated directly over any person, except authorized and consenting

production personnel, below an altitude that is hazardous to persons or property on the surface

in the event of a UAS failure or emergency.

16. Regarding the distance from participating persons, the operator’s manual has safety

mitigations for authorized and consenting production personnel. At all times, those persons

must be essential to the closed-set film operations. Because these procedures are specific to

participating persons, no further FSDO or Aviation Safety Inspector (ASI) approval is

necessary for reductions to the distances specified in the petitioner’s manuals. This is

consistent with the manned aircraft procedures described in FAA Order 8900.1, V3, C8, S1

Issue a Certificate of Waiver for Motion Picture and Television Filming. 17. Regarding distance from non-participating persons, the operator must ensure that no

persons are allowed within 500 feet of the area except those consenting to be involved and

necessary for the filming production. This provision may be reduced to no less than 200 feet if

it would not adversely affect safety and the Administrator has approved it. For example, an

equivalent level of safety may be determined by an aviation safety inspector’s evaluation of

the filming production area to note terrain features, obstructions, buildings, safety barriers, etc.
13

13

Such barriers may protect non-participating persons (observers, the public, news media, etc.)

from debris in the event of an accident. This is also consistent with the same FAA Order

8900.1, V3, C8, S1. 18. If the UAS loses communications or loses its GPS signal, the UA must

return to a pre-determined location within the security perimeter and land or be recovered in

accordance with the operator’s manual.

18. If the UAS loses communications or loses its GPS signal, the UA must return to a

pre-determined location within the security perimeter and land or be recovered in

accordance with the operator’s manual.

19. The UAS must abort the flight in the event of unpredicted obstacles or emergencies in

accordance with the operator’s manual.

20. Each UAS operation must be completed within 30 minutes flight time or with 25%

battery power remaining, whichever occurs first.

21. The operator must obtain an Air Traffic Organization (ATO) issued Certificate of Waiver or

Authorization (COA) prior to conducting any operations under this grant of

exemption. This COA will also require the operator to request a Notice to Airman

(NOTAM) not more than 72 hours in advance, but not less than 48 hours prior to the

operation.

22. All aircraft operated in accordance with this exemption must be identified by serial

number, registered in accordance with 14 CFR part 47, and have identification

(N-Number) markings in accordance with 14 CFR part 45, Subpart C. Markings must

be as large as practicable.

23. The operator must develop procedures to document and maintain a record of the UAS

maintenance, preventative maintenance, alterations, status of replacement/overhaul

component parts, and the total time in service of the UAS. These procedures must be

added to the operator’s manual.

24. Each UAS operated under this exemption must comply with all manufacturer Safety

Bulletins.

25. The operator must develop UAS technician qualification criteria. These criteria must be

added to the operator’s manual.

26. The preflight inspection section in the operator’s manual must be amended to include the

following requirement: The preflight inspection must account for all discrepancies, i.e.

inoperable components, items, or equipment, not covered in the relevant preflight

inspection sections of the operator’s manual.
14

14

27. Before conducting operations, the radio frequency spectrum used for operation and control

of the UAS must comply with the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) or other

appropriate government oversight agency requirements.

28. At least three days before scheduled filming, the operator of the UAS affected by this

exemption must submit a written Plan of Activities to the local FSDO with jurisdiction over

the area of proposed filming. The 3-day notification may be waived with the concurrence

of the FSDO. The plan of activities must include at least the following:

a. Dates and times for all flights

b. Name and phone number of the person responsible for the UAS filming

production under this grant of exemption

c. Name and phone number of the person responsible for the on-scene operation

of the UAS.

d. Make, model and serial or N-number of the UAS to be used

e. Name and certificate number of the UAS PIC's involved in the filming

production event

f. A statement that the operator has obtained permission from property

owners and/or local officials to conduct the filming production event; the

list of those who gave permission must be made available to the

inspector upon request.

g. Signature of exemption-holder or representative

h. A description of the flight activity, including maps or diagrams of any area,

city, town, county, and/or state over which filming will be conducted and the

altitudes essential to accomplish the operation

29. The documents required under 14 CFR § 91.9 and § 91.203 must be available to the PIC

at the ground control station of the UAS any time the aircraft is operating. These

documents must be made available to the Administrator or any law enforcement official

upon request.

30. The UAS must remain clear and yield the right of way to all other manned operations and

activities at all times (including, but not limited to, ultralight vehicles, parachute activities,

parasailing activities, hang gliders, etc.).

31. UAS operations may not be conducted during night, as defined in 14 CFR § 1.1. All

operations must be conducted under visual meteorological conditions (VMC). Flights

under special visual flight rules (SVFR) are not authorized.
15

15

32. The UAS cannot be operated by the PIC from any moving device or vehicle.

33. The UAS may not be operated less than 500 feet below or less than 2,000 feet horizontally

from a cloud or when visibility is less than 3 statute miles from the PIC.

34. The UAS may not operate in Class B, C, or D airspace without written approval from the

FAA. The UAS may not operate within 5 miles of the geographic center of a non-towered

airport as denoted on a current FAA-published aeronautical chart unless a letter of

agreement with that airport’s management is obtained, and the operation is conducted in

accordance with a NOTAM as required by the operator’s COA. The letter of agreement

with the airport management must be made available to the Administrator upon request.

35. Any 1) incident, 2) accident, or 3) flight operation that transgresses the lateral or vertical

boundaries of the operational area as defined by the applicable COA must be reported to

the Federal Aviation Administration’s (FAA) UAS Integration Office (AFS-80) within 24

hours. Accidents must be reported to the National Transportation Safety Board (NTSB) per

instructions contained on the NTSB Web site: www.ntsb.gov. Further flight operations may

not be conducted until the incident, accident, or transgression is reviewed by AFS-80 and

authorization to resume operations is provided.

Currently, the aforementioned aerial videography/photography relies primarily on the use of

larger aircraft running on combustible fuel. Posing potential risk to the public. Granting my,

Matthew E. Barnes (Horizon Drones, LLC)’s, request for exemption will reduce current

risk levels and thereby enhance safety. My UAS craft do not contain potentially explosive fuel,

is smaller, lighter and more maneuverable than conventional video and photographic aircraft

with much less flight time.

Further, I operate at lower altitudes and in controlled airspace eliminating potential public risk

flying to and from established airfields. I, Matthew E. Barnes (Horizon Drones, LLC), have been informally analyzing and recording flight information and will compile safety

protocols and the implementation of a flight operations manual for usage that exceeds

currently accepted means and methods for safe flight. Formal collection of information shared

with the FAA will enhance the FAA's internal efforts to establish protocols for complying with

the FAA Modernization and Reform Act of 2012. There are no personnel on board my, Matthew

E. Barnes (Horizon Drones, LLC)’s, UAS and therefore the likelihood of death or serious bodily

injury is significantly diminished. My, Matthew E. Barnes (Horizon Drones, LLC)’s, operation of

my UAS, weighing less than forty (40) pounds and traveling at lower speeds within limited areas

low to the ground will provide an equivalent level of safety as that achieved under current FARs.

Accordingly I, Matthew E. Barnes (Horizon Drones, LLC), respectfully request that the FAA

grant my exemption request and am willing to cooperate in sharing information to benefit the

FAA, safety of manned aircraft, and the general public at large.
16

16

Respectfully submitted,

Matthew E. Barnes (Horizon Drones, LLC)

455 Valerie Drive

Titusville, FL 32796

10

Appendix A

List of Aircraft

No. Make and Model Description Serial No. Registration

No.

1 DJI Inspire Electric powered, 4 rotor, small

unmanned multirotor helicopter

W130CE11

030071

Pending

2 DJI Phantom 3 Electric powered, 4 rotor small

unmanned multirotor helicopter

Pending Pending

1. DJI INSPIRE ONE

The operation of the DJI INSPIRE ONE system is as follows.

1. Build Materials

I. Plastic

II. Aluminum

2. Motor Configuration

I. The DJI Inspire 1- flight is a 4 motor quadcopter setup. ,

3. Payload
17

17

I. The DJI INSPIRE ONE flies it’s own light-weight integrated camera.

II. Maximum All-up weight- 6lbs

4. Maintaining the DJI INSPIRE ONE

I. Before each flight:

1. Check all hardware to ensure it is securely tightened.

2. Check that the motor is level and locked in place.

3. Check the propeller to ensure it is tight and there are no visible signs of cracks, stress,

4. Check all wiring to motors, motor controllers, batteries, and flight controller for signs of

5. Check all navigational lighting to ensure it is properly working.

II. After 45 hours of flight

1. Remove and check all motors and motor mounts for signs of wear and tear. Replace as

necessary.

2. Remove motor controllers and visually inspect and check for damage. Replace as necessary.

3. Remove flight controllers and visually inspect and check for damage. Replace as necessary.

and/or chips. Replace if propeller is questionable.

4. Check for cuts, fraying, cracks, and/or loose/cold solder connections. Fix before flying.

5. Check for updates to flight controller firmware. If available, install and

perform a minimum of 15 test flights before conducting commercial work.

Appendix B

2. DJI Phantom 3

The operation of the DJI Phantom 3 system is as follows.

1. Build Materials

I. Plastic

II. Aluminum

2. Motor Configuration

I. The Phantom 3 flight in a 4 motor quadcopter setup. ,

3. Payload

I. The Phantom 3 it’s own integrated camera.

II. Maximum All-up Weight- 4lbs

4. Maintaining the Phantom 3

I. Before each flight:

1. Check all hardware to ensure it is securely tightened.

2. Check that the motor is level and locked in place.

3. Check the propeller to ensure it is tight and there are no visible signs of cracks, stress,

4. Check all wiring to motors, motor controllers, batteries, and flight controller for signs of
18

18

5. Check all navigational lighting to ensure it is properly working.

II. After 45 hours of flight

1. Remove and check all motors and motor mounts for signs of wear and tear. Replace as

necessary.

2. Remove motor controllers and visually inspect and check for damage. Replace as necessary.

3. Remove flight controllers and visually inspect and check for damage. Replace as necessary.

and/or chips. Replace if propeller is questionable.

4. Check for cuts, fraying, cracks, and/or loose/cold solder connections. Fix before flying.

5. Check for updates to flight controller firmware. If available, install and

perform a minimum of 15 test flights before conducting commercial work.

Appendix C

Personal Protocols/Controls/Flight Manual

Protocols and Controls

Matthew E. Barnes (Horizon Drones, LLC), Titusville, FL.

Safety for public on the ground as well as manned aircraft above is an essential and utmost

consideration for aerial videos and photography. As such, safety protocols and controls must be

implemented through pre‐flight preparation and during flight. Pre‐Flight Protocol:

Check batteries with voltage meter to insure fully charged and ready for use.

Inspect batteries for damage or leakage that may affect proper operation.

Inspect propellers for cracks, chips or damage that may cause sudden loss of propulsion or

unmanageable/uncontrolled flight.

Check all GPS and Telemetry connections prior to flight.

Check weather forecasts for wind advisory or other conditions that my impact flight.

Consult Sky Vector aeronautical Charts (Skyvector.com) for airport vicinity and flight paths of

possible air traffic.

Contact respective airport to advise of estimated flight time, estimated flight duration, estimated

elevation of flight, and any other pertinent information.

Inspect flight area for

Vicinity of public safety helipads/heliports

Vicinity of medical helipads/heliports
19

19

Vicinity of light poles vicinity or utility wires

Vicinity of trees flocks of birds that may cause interference and potential flight impact

Vicinity of any elevated obstructions that may pose potential flight hazard

Vicinity of roadways with moderate to heavy traffic that can be distracted public

Gatherings that may attract viewers optional point of control for best visual site of UAS

while in flight

Emergency landing areas

Takeoff and landing

Inspect area for best and safest point of takeoff and landing

If in a subdivision or area that is within 150 feet of a residential street, post warning

Sign(s)/stand(s) "Attention Aerial Photography In Progress ‐ Remain Back 150 Feet”

Flight Protocol: takeoff and land from same location (have alternate landing areas in case of

emergencies) remain alert to birds, sound or aircraft, curious public, and approaching vehicles

do not allow anyone to engage in conversation or distract the remote control pilot restrict flight to

minimal elevation sufficient to acquire desired results remained prepared for emergency landing

at all times pay attention to flight time – warning meter for low voltage.

Set voltage meter alarm for low voltage and flight timer as a safety alert land UAS and shut down

propulsion immediately following landing – priority of disconnecting batteries

Post flight:

1. a) Disconnect battery to prevent accidental activation of propulsion system

2. b) Secure UAS in a safe location

c) Remove all warning signs from public access areas Emergency or Suspected Hazard:

Immediate land UAS at safest and closet ground location in the event

Manned aircraft is heard or seen in vicinity of flight

There is a public gathering within established safety boundary wanting to observe flight

Pilot is being distracted from focusing on flight and safety

Sudden change in weather (wind bursts)

Sudden increase in vehicular traffic in vicinity of flight

Birds enter into proximity of flight

Any sudden unsafe event that can cause collision, distraction or interruption of control

Safety for public on the ground as well as manned aircraft above is an essential and utmost

consideration for aerial videos and photography.
20

20

Maintaining a record of safe flight for FAA request and for determining future UAS safety

protocols is imperative.

Date:____________________

Location:___________________________________________________

Pre‐flight Inspection:

o Yes o No

Comment: _________________________________________________

Elements

Proximity to airport: _________________ (see attached map pinpointing approximate location of

flight)

Airport notified: No Yes

Date:_______________ Time: ______________

Phone Number: _______________________

Contact Name:___________________________________

Nearest major intersection: ______________________________________________________________ Proximity to medium traffic road: _________________________________________________________ Proximity to heavily traveled roadway road: _________________________________________________ Proximity to congested population: ________________________________________________________ Approx. Takeoff Time: GMT:

Weather Good Fair Poor Comment:

Visibility Good Fair Poor Comment:
21

21

Wind Speed ___mph ___Gusts/MPH ___avg/MPH Comment:

Approx. Landing Time: GMT: Estimated Elevation Ground level:

Safety Concerns:

Additional Comments:

Sea level:

Appendix 'D'

Aircraft Manuals

This Appendix includes UAS manufacturer's user manuals, maintenance instructions, and

illustrated parts catalogs. These manuals may be attached to the docket when submitted.

Information regarding design, aircraft performance, fail-safe features, operating limitations,

normal and emergency procedures, and maintenance and inspection procedures is contained

within the manuals and supplemental information documents listed below:

1. DJI Inspire Manual V1.0

2. Inspire 1 Maintenance Manual v1.0

3. Intelligent Flight Battery Safety Guidelines v1.4

4. Inspire 1 Safety Guidelines

5. Phantom 3 Professional Manual V1.0

6. Phantom 3 Intelligent Flight Battery Safety Guidelines v1.0 (EN)

For more information or questions about this manual please contact:

Horizon Drones, LLC

455 Valerie Drive

Titusville, FL 32796

(904) 674-4698