alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

DAY ELEV

 531.82

 530.23

 528.59

 526.94

 525.18

 523.32

 521.40

 519.46

 517.33

 515.05

 512.88

 511.00

 509.31

 507.80

 506.38

 504.92

 503.40

 502.00

 500.59

 499.27

 497.45

 496.32

 495.21

 494.12

 493.19

 492.48

 491.91

 491.52

 491.14

 490.98

 321.7

 315.8

 309.8

 303.8

 297.5

 290.9

 284.2

 277.5

 270.3

 262.7

 255.6

 249.5

 244.1

 239.3

 234.9

 230.4

 225.8

 221.6

 217.4

 213.5

 208.2

 205.0

 201.8

 198.8

 196.2

 194.2

 192.7

 191.6

 190.5

 190.1

STORAGE

-5.6

-5.9

-6.0

-6.0

-6.3

-6.6

-6.7

-6.7

-7.2

-7.6

-7.1

-6.1

-5.4

-4.8

-4.4

-4.5

-4.6

-4.2

-4.2

-3.9

-5.3

-3.2

-3.2

-3.1

-2.6

-2.0

-1.6

-1.1

-1.0

-0.4

CHANGE

45

296

228

218

178

218

205

240

165

109

130

222

125

98

119

172

172

463

464

409

-717

116

142

146

111

132

51

104

101

79

INFLOW

 405

 402

 308

 268

 331

 492

 534

 436

 471

 533

 524

 448

 291

 250

 248

 245

 242

 238

 236

 233

 229

 226

 223

 221

 109

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

MADERA

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

SPILL

 1,917

 2,133

 2,237

 2,250

 2,312

 2,335

 2,341

 2,462

 2,630

 2,693

 2,692

 2,488

 2,198

 1,898

 1,742

 1,828

 1,896

 1,993

 1,985

 1,772

 1,495

 1,390

 1,384

 1,340

 1,180

 991

 719

 519

 496

 178

FRIANT-KERN

 16

 23

 14

 22

 20

 10

 9

 14

 7

 11

 4

 0

 5

 5

 8

 10

 11

 4

 3

 14

 4

 11

 3

 9

 8

 11

 5

 4

 10

 2

C.F.S.

 .13

 .19

 .12

 .19

 .17

 .09

 .08

 .13

 .06

 .10

 .04

 .00

 .05

 .05

 .08

 .10

 .11

 .04

 .03

 .15

 .04

 .12

 .03

 .10

 .09

 .12

 .06

 .04

 .11

 .02

INCHES

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .15

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .06

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .01

 .00

 .00

 .00

PRECIP

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

NOVEMBER 2009 MILLERTON LAKE DAILY OPERATIONS RUN DATE: December 1, 2009

IN LAKE

EVAPORATION

INCHES

C.F.S.

COMPUTED*

1000 ACRE-FEET

RELEASE - C.F.S. 

TOTALS -137.2 4,541 8,143 53,494 0 277 2.64 .22

ACRE-FEET -137,198 9,007 16,152 106,105 0 549

COMMENTS:

* COMPUTED INFLOW IS THE SUM OF CHANGE IN STORAGE, RELEASES, PUMPING AND EVAPORATION.

SUMMARY

RELEASE (ACRE-FEET)

CANALS

FRIANT-KERN

MADERA

 106,105

 16,152 145,654

PRECIPITATION

THIS MONTH =

JULY 1, 2009 TO DATE = 1.83

 327.3

 23,397 0.22

CANALS

AT FRIANT

TOTAL RELEASES

OUTLET

 553

 701

 703

 699

 695

 698

 698

 693

 703

 710

 499

 348

 346

 346

 351

 357

 354

 352

 351

 346

 216

 121

 120

 120

 120

 120

 119

 119

 119

 119

RIVER

 11,796

 23,397

RIVER
<TABLE> <S> <C>



<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
The schedule contains summary financial information extracted from Growth Hotel
Investors II and is qualified in its entirety by reference to such financial
statements.
</LEGEND>

<MULTIPLIER>   1

       
<S>                                  <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                            YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                 DEC-31-1995
<PERIOD-START>                    JAN-01-1995
<PERIOD-END>                      DEC-31-1995
<CASH>                              8,007,000 <F1>
<SECURITIES>                                0
<RECEIVABLES>                       1,376,000  <F2>
<ALLOWANCES>                                0
<INVENTORY>                                 0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            0
<PP&E>                            121,883,000
<DEPRECIATION>                    (38,136,000)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                     95,138,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       0
<BONDS>                            50,139,000
<COMMON>                                    0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                       0
<PREFERRED>                                 0
<OTHER-SE>                         37,975,000
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>       95,138,000
<SALES>                                     0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                   50,046,000
<CGS>                                       0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                      36,188,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                            0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                            0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                  5,461,000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                     5,712,000
<INCOME-TAX>                                0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                 5,712,000
<DISCONTINUED>                              0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                             0
<CHANGES>                                   0
<NET-INCOME>                        5,712,000
<EPS-PRIMARY>                           94.91
<EPS-DILUTED>                           94.91
<FN>
<F1> Cash includes restricted cash of $902,000.
<F2> Receivables include other assets of $630,000.
</FN>
        


</TABLE>
Editorial Note on Part 40
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 40 appear by T.D. ATF-460, 66 FR 39094-39096, July 27, 2001; T.D. ATF-464, 66 FR 43479, Aug. 20, 2001; and T.D. TTB-91, 76 FR 5479, Feb. 1, 2011.

§ 40.182 Record of tobacco and processed tobacco. ( a ) Except as provided in paragraph (b) of this section, a manufacturer of tobacco products must maintain a record that shows the total quantity in pounds of all: ( 1 ) Processed tobacco on hand at the beginning of each month;
( 2 ) Processed tobacco received, together with the name and address of the person from whom received and the date of receipt;
( 3 ) Processed tobacco used in the manufacture of tobacco products, together with the date of use;
( 4 ) Processed tobacco lost, together with the date and other circumstances of the loss;
( 5 ) Processed tobacco destroyed, together with the date and other circumstances of the destruction;
( 6 ) Processed tobacco removed, together with the date of the removal and reason for the removal; and
( 7 ) Tobacco (unprocessed) on hand at the beginning of each month and used in the manufacture of tobacco products, lost, destroyed, or removed during each month.
( b ) A manufacturer of tobacco products that is required to obtain authorization to engage in another business within the factory under §§ 40.47(b) and 40.72(b) must keep records as prescribed in § 40.521, in addition to those required elsewhere in this part.
(Approved by the Office of Management and Budget under control number 1513-0068) [T.D. TTB-104, 77 FR 37302, June 21, 2012]
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ENACTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of United Bancorp, Inc. (the "Company")
on Form 10-Q for the period ending September 30, 2007 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Randall
M. Greenwood, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, as enacted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that:

     (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
          of the Company.


/s/ Randall M. Greenwood
-----------------------------------------
Randall M. Greenwood,
Senior Vice President and Chief
Financial Officer

November 14, 2007
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.,

 Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Marilyn Kelly

Stephen J. Markman

Diane M. Hathaway

Mary Beth Kelly

Brian K. Zahra, Justices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

 _________________________________________ 

 Clerk

June 28, 2011 

y0620 

Order 

 

June 28, 2011 

142274 

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, 

Plaintiff-Appellee, 

v SC: 142274 

 COA: 298892 

Emmet CC: 01-001711-FC 

THOMAS ALAN SCHRAM, 

Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/ 

 On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the November 15, 2010 

order of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because the defendant has 

failed to meet the burden of establishing entitlement to relief under MCR 6.508(D).
Tangier

Island

Airport

Tangier North Channel

Goose

Harbor

Go

ose

Harb

or

C H E S A P E A K E B A Y

Tangier

Tangier Island

The Flats

The

Flats

Goose

Island

Rum

Point

East of

Reedville

Great Fox

Island

Tangier

Island

West of

Nandua

Creek

Nandua

Creek

East of

Fleets Bay

Smith

Point

Goose

Island

Ewell

50'

30"

52'

07'

30"

37°

30"

30"

30"

52'

76 5' °

45'

76°

37° 30"

76° 5'

50'

2'

45'

07'

47'

30"

30"

76°00'

37°

2'

47'

3

37°

810

000 FEET (SOUTH)

170

000

000 FEET (SOUTH)

200

00'

12 4 000m

FEET (SOUTH)

4

41

41

12

4

41

4

000m

000m

41

000m

41

41

41

41

41

41

4

41

41

41

4 4

4 4

41

4

41

41

4 4

41

02

41

41

4

41

4 4

41

41

41

41

4

4

85

41

41

N

79

41

07

90

04

89

05

86

09 10 E

83

06

03 07

09

4 06

10

91

05 4

92

87

81

79

92

83

08

87

89

02 4

80

86

84

81

82

82

N

85

88

04

91

E 12

11

84

90

03

88

08

3 850 000

FEET (SOUTH)

U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U. S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY

VIRGINIA

ADJOINING 7.5' QUADRANGLES

QUADRANGLE LOCATION

GOOSE ISLAND, VA

2011

Interstate Route State Route

ROAD CLASSIFICATION

Ramp 4WD

US Route Local Road

WX Interstate Route /. US Route H State Route

This map was produced to conform with version 0.5.10 of the

draft USGS Standards for 7.5-Minute Quadrangle Maps.

A metadata file associated with this product is draft version 0.5.11

CONTOURS NOT PRESENT BECAUSE AVAILABLE ELEVATION

DATA DO NOT MEET ACCURACY REQUIREMENTS

SCALE 1:24 000

1 0.5 0

MILES

1

1000 0 1000 2000 3000 4000 5000 6000 7000 8000 9000 10000

FEET

1000 500 0 METERS 1000 2000

1 0.5 0 KILOMETERS 1 2

Imagery..................................................NAIP, August 2009

Roads...............................................©2006-2010 Tele Atlas

Names...............................................................GNIS, 2010

Hydrography.................National Hydrography Dataset, 2009

Contours..........................................................Not Available

North American Datum of 1983 (NAD83)

World Geodetic System of 1984 (WGS84). Projection and

1 000-meter grid: Universal Transverse Mercator, Zone 18S

Produced by the United States Geological Survey

10 000-foot ticks: Virginia Coordinate System of 1983 (south

zone)

GOOSE ISLAND QUADRANGLE

VIRGINIA

7.5-MINUTE SERIES

U.S. National Grid

100,000-m Square ID

Grid Zone Designation

VG

18S

×

Ø

MN

GN

UTM GRID AND 2011 MAGNETIC NORTH DECLINATION AT CENTER OF SHEET

0° 39 ́

12 MILS

11° 7 ́

198 MILS
Exhibit 99.1

CERTIFICATIONS

(Exchange Act Rule 13a-14)

 

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO 

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

 

For the Year ended **December 31, 2002**
Commission File Number **33-4682**
 
**CAPITAL BUILDERS DEVELOPMENT PROPERTIES II,

A CALIFORNIA LIMITED PARTNERSHIP

 

In connection with the Report of Capital Builders Development Properties II on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2002, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the "Report"), I, Michael J. Metzger, President of Capital Builders, Inc., certify, based on my knowledge, that:

(1) The Report complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and 

(2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Capital Builders Development Properties II.

  

March 28, 2003		

 

Michael J. Metzger

President**
# Birch Aphids

|USDA Logo | United StatesDepartment ofAgriculture | PREPARED BYForestService | LeafletR10-TP-98August 2001 | Forest Service Logo
|--------- | ------------------------------------- | ------------------------ | --------------------------- | -------------------

---

> CAUTION: Pesticides can be injurious to humans, domestic animals,
>  desirable plants and fish, or other wildlife-if they are not handled or
>  applied properly. Use all pesticides selectively and carefully. Since 
> approved uses of a pesticide may change frequently, it is important to 
> check the label for current approved and legal use. Follow recommended 
> practices for the disposal of surplus pesticides and pesticide 
> containers. Mention of a pesticide in this publication does not 
> constitute a recommendation for use by the USDA, nor does it imply 
> registration of a product under Federal Insecticide, Fungicide, and 
> Rodenticide Act, as amended. Mention of a proprietary product does not 
> constitute an endorsement by the USDA.Birch Aphids
> by Edward H. Holsten, Research Entomologist, USDA Forest Service, Alaska Region, State and Private Forestry
> Additional information on this insect can be obtained from your local 
> USDA Alaska Cooperative Extension office, Alaska State Forestry office, 
> or from:
> Forest Health Protection
> State and Private Forestry
> USDA Forest Service
> 2770 Sherwood Lane, Suite 2A
> Juneau, Alaska 99801-8545
> Phone: (907) 586-8883
> Forest Health Protection
> State and Private Forestry
> USDA Forest Service
> 3301 "C" Street, Suite 202
> Anchorage, Alaska 99503
> Phone: (907) 743-9455
> or:http://www.fs.fed.us/r10/spf/fhp/
> The U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) prohibits discrimination in 
> all its programs and activities on the basis of race, color, national 
> origin, sex, religion, age, disability, political beliefs, sexual 
> orientation, or marital or family status. (Not all prohibited bases 
> apply to all programs.) Persons with disabilities who require 
> alternative means for communication of program information (Braille, 
> large print, audiotape, etc.) should contact USDA's TARGET Center at 
> (202) 720-2600 (voice and TDD).
> To file a complaint of discrimination, write USDA, Director, Office of 
> Civil Rights, Room 326-W, Whitten Building, 1400 Independence Avenue, 
> SW, Washington, DC 20250-9410, or call (202) 720-5964 (voice and TDD). 
> USDA is an equal opportunity provider and employer.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY ELEV

 121.92

 121.56

 121.29

 121.14

 121.52

 122.40

 122.26

 121.49

 121.39

 123.17

 123.24

 122.55

 122.05

 122.06

 122.37

 122.61

 123.06

 123.64

 123.46

 122.68

 122.46

 122.36

 122.54

 122.69

 123.20

 122.80

 123.29

 122.66

 122.65

 122.37

 122.52

 7,307

 7,156

 7,043

 6,980

 7,139

 7,521

 7,458

 7,127

 7,085

 7,871

 7,904

 7,589

 7,364

 7,368

 7,508

 7,616

 7,819

 8,092

 8,007

 7,647

 7,548

 7,503

 7,584

 7,652

 7,885

 7,701

 7,927

 7,638

 7,634

 7,508

 7,575

STORAGE

-169

-151

-113

-63

+159

+382

-63

-331

-42

+786

+33

-315

-225

+4

+140

+108

+203

+273

-85

-360

-99

-45

+81

+68

+233

-184

+226

-289

-4

-126

+67

CHANGE

7,899

7,870

7,872

7,864

7,953

7,814

7,120

6,770

7,013

7,593

7,280

7,088

7,080

7,179

7,269

7,261

7,336

7,397

7,217

7,047

7,160

7,174

7,246

6,939

6,765

5,673

5,293

4,893

5,046

4,980

5,038

INFLOW

 5,026

 5,027

 5,029

 5,014

 4,988

 4,980

 4,993

 4,991

 4,454

 4,990

 4,995

 4,999

 4,993

 5,002

 5,002

 4,992

 4,997

 4,996

 4,993

 4,993

 4,996

 4,999

 4,993

 4,774

 4,944

 4,941

 4,944

 4,939

 4,948

 4,943

 4,902

POWER

 2,859

 2,821

 2,801

 2,779

 2,782

 2,538

 2,056

 1,844

 2,479

 2,106

 2,166

 2,146

 2,098

 2,074

 2,092

 2,116

 2,140

 2,168

 2,170

 2,138

 2,116

 2,100

 2,114

 2,034

 1,607

 730

 138

 0

 0

 0

 0

SPILL

 60

 60

 60

 60

 60

 60

 60

 60

 60

 60

 60

 60

 60

 60

 60

 60

 60

 60

 60

 60

 60

 60

 60

 60

 60

 60

 60

 60

 60

 60

 60

HATCHERY

 4

 3

 3

 3

 3

 3

 3

 2

 1

 1

 2

 2

 2

 1

 4

 2

 2

 0

 2

 2

 3

 3

 3

 2

 2

 0

 2

 1

 0

 1

 2

C.F.S.

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

MAY 2011 LAKE NATOMA DAILY OPERATIONS RUN DATE: June 1, 2011

IN LAKE

EVAP

C.F.S.

COMPUTED*

ACRE-FEET

RELEASE - C.F.S.

TOTALS +99 214,129 153,777 57,212 1,860 64

ACRE-FEET +99 424,725 305,017 113,480 3,689 127

COMMENTS:

* COMPUTED INFLOW IS THE SUM OF CHANGE IN STORAGE, RELEASES AND EVAPORATION.

SUMMARY

RELEASES (ACRE-FEET)

POWER 305,017

SPILL 113,480

FOLSOM SOUTH CANAL

HATCHERY

 2,315

 3,689

 7,476

FOLSOM

SOUTH 

CANAL

 35

 35

 36

 40

 40

 40

 40

 40

 40

 40

 40

 40

 40

 40

 40

 37

 35

 35

 35

 35

 35

 35

 35

 35

 35

 35

 35

 39

 40

 40

 40

 1,167

 2,315

(1)

(1) INCHES OF EVAPORATION TAKEN FROM FOLSOM PAN.

RELEASES (ACRE-FEET)

TOTAL 424,501
## Swanson , Bria n (OST) 

# ^^ga^c^-^cpo o -(^^"^ ^ From : Sent : To : Subject : Kalaupapati m @ aol.co m Thursday , January12 , 201 2 10:0 9 P M EA S (OST ) answe rt o Pacifi cWings ' petitio n fo rreconsideratio n 

## :^ tOPtRATiON S !• • 2^ 1 FY I From : Kalaupapatim@aol.co m To : dennis.devanv @ dot.ao v Sent : 1/12/201 2 2:00:5 5 P.M . Hawaiia n Standar d Tim e Subj : (n o subject ) Dea rMr . D e Vany , I a m a residen t ofKalaupap a Hawai i an d I woul d lik e t o giv e yo u m ythought s o n Pacifi c Wings ' petitio n t o ge t th e EA S contrac t back . I hav e live d i n Kalaupap a an d hav e del t wit h Pacifi cWing s fo r6 years . Mos t ofthos e year s wer e fin e an d th e rate s wer e reasonable . Afte rPacifi cWing s an d th e Stat e DO Tha d a n "issue " everythin g changed . Rate s fo rflight s i n a n ou t o fKalaupap a wer e comparabl e t o al l th e othe rairport s i n Hawai i an d were , a t time s a s lo wa s $29.0 0 eac h wa yt o Honolulu . Afte rth e allege d "confrontation " betwee n DO Tinspector s an d Pacifi cWing s employees , th e rate s starte d t o g o up . Gre g Kahlstorf(forgiv e m e ifhi s nam e i s misspelled ) denie s tha tther e i s an y connectio n betwee n th e two . I happe n t o hav e bee n th e actin g Administrato rfo r Kalaupap a a t tha t tim e an d wa s include d i n man yE-mail s betwee n Gre g an d Marvi n Muni z ofth e HDO Tan d I d o believ e the ywer e related . Mr . Walde n seem s t o misrepresen t quit e a fe wfact s i n hi s lette rt o Susa n Kurlan d regardin g wh yKalaupap a Resident s shoul d pa y$250.0 0 R/ Tt o topsid e Moloka i an d $510.0 0 R/ Tt o Honolul u whe n h e wa s able t o onl ycharg e $29.0 0 eac h wa yfare s fro m Moloka i t o Honolulu . Kalaupap a Airport an d Moloka i Airport ar e onl y8 mile s apart . M rWalde n state s tha t th e fare s ar e tha t hig h du e t o th e "staggerin g expense " wit h dealin g wit h routin e mechanica l issue s lik e a fla t tire . I n th e 6 year s tha tI hav e live d here , I onl ykno w ofon e instanc e wher e ther e wa s an yissu e wit h a commercia l plan e an d i twa s a fla ttir e du e t o th e Pacifi cWing s pilo t landin g s o har d tha t h e ble wth e tir e ou tan d nearl y crashe d th e plane . Pacifi cWing s woul d no t allo wu s t o mov e th e plan e awa yfro m th e runwa ys o ou rairport wa s shu t dow n fo r3 day s unti l the ycoul d fin d th e cheapes twa yt o ge t th e part s t o fi xth e whee l dow n t o Kalaupapa . Mr . Walde n als o state s tha to n Marc h 26t h 2011 , Hawaiia n Ai radvertise d on e wa yai rfare s fro m Mau i t o Moloka i a t$294 , $32 0 an d $330 . Sinc e Hawaiia n ha s no t flow n t o Moloka i fo r1 0 year s i tshow s anothe r misrepresentatio n ofth e facts . Pacifi cWing s ha s no tb e truthfu l i n thei rdealing s an d ha s gauge d u s o n fare s fo rth e las t fe wyear s an d i fth e ge tth e EA S contrac tbac k the y wil l continu e t o d o so . I hop e tha t yo u wil l se e an d lear n al l th e fact s an d wil l kee p Makan i Ka i a s ou rEA S carrier . The yhav e bee n veryhelpfu l an d hav e tru e Aloh a spirit . Than k Yo u fo ryou rtime , Ti m Richmon d
### §1132–2. Rule of construction

Nothing in this subchapter shall be construed to authorize the Secretary to mandate, direct, or control an institution of higher education's specific instructional content, curriculum, or program of instruction.

(Pub. L. 89–329, title VI, §633, as added Pub. L. 110–315, title VI, §622, Aug. 14, 2008, 122 Stat. 3343.)
# CBPOf fice of Administration **Facilities Management and**  **Engineering Tactical**  **Infrastructure Environmental Stewardship** 

**Presented to** 

# Good Neighbor Environmental Board

March 11, 2010

# Life Cycle Environmental **Stewardship Approach for Tactical**  **Infrastructure**
• Pre - planning • Wa lked the ground with stakeholders • Project Planning • Produced NEPA documents and Environmental Stewardship Plans • Public meetings • Continuous coordination with resource agencies (USFW S; State Agencies, Tribes, etc) • Performed surveys • During Construction • Best Management Practices part of contracts • Environmental Awareness training for contractors • Third party environmental monitors • Post Construction • Preparing Environmental Stewardship Summary Reports to document final footprint and compare planned versus actual • Drainage Improvement Projects to minimize erosion and flood risk • Re -vegetation and slope stabilization • Maintenance and Repair • Best Management Practices in contracts • Environmental Awareness Training for contractors • Full NEPA where lacking appropriate coverage 2

# Example Environmental Stewardship Actions **for PF 225 and VF300**
• Prepared 8 final and another 10 draft NEPA documents and 22 ESPs • Provided 36 environmental training courses to contractors before construction • Conducted we ll over 90,000 hours of onsite environmental monitors during construction • Identified and documented over 350 archeological sites and surveyed over 13,000 acres and excavated 56 sites before construction • Developed Best Management Practices (BMPs) w ith the USFWS and prepared and shared Biological Resources Plans that evaluated over 75 threatened and endangered species and 25 critical habitats 34



# Pr**otecting Endanger** **ed Monodella**

**San Diego A** **- 1** 5 

# CBP Biologist **Surveys for Endangered Quino Butterfly San Diego A** **- 1** 6 

# Environmental Monitor **Moves Birds from Construction Corridor El Centro** 7 

# Temporary Caps on Bollard Posts to Prevent **Animals from being Trapped**8 

# Transplanting Agave Cactus **Coronado National Memorial**

# Mormon House Site Excavation, Ariz**ona**

**Before Excav ation**  **Af ter**  **Excav ation** 

# Mormon House Final Capping, Ariz**ona**11 

# Fence Constructed While Protecting **Historic Border Monument** 12 

# Wildlife **Panels (“Deer Fence”) New**  **Mexico**

## Department **of Agriculture**  **Field Test Carrizo Cane Control**  **Laredo, Texas Brow**  **n cage show s**  **cane wi**  **thout exposure to**  **wa sp;**  **foreground show s**  **effect on cane**  **wi th**  **wa sp** 

**control**14 

# Wildlife **Passage (“Cat Hole”) Rio Grande Valley** 15 

# Sabal Palm Salvage **Rio Grande Valley**

# Post Fence Construction Drainage Improvements17 

# “Smugglers Gulch” San Diego

**February 2**  **010 May**  **2 009**