alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
P.O. BOX 3086 OSHKOSH, WI 54903-3086 • Tel 920.426.6522 • Fax 920.426.6560 • WWW.EAA.ORG

April 6, 2011

U.S. Department of Transportation 

Docket Operations, M-30

West Building Ground Floor, Room W12-140 

1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE. 

Washington, DC 20590.

Reference: Request for Comment Period Extension for Airworthiness Directives; Burl A. Rogers 

(Type Certificate Previously Held by William Brad Mitchell and Aeronca, Inc.)Models 15AC and 

S15AC Airplanes, Docket FAA-2011-0318.

To Whom It May Concern:

EAA (Experimental Aircraft Association) is the world leader in recreational aviation. VAA 

(Vintage Aircraft Association) is the world leader in the retention and restoration of historical 

Antique, Classic and Contemporary aircraft. With a combined international membership of 

160,000 people in more than 110 nations, EAA and VAA bring together aviation enthusiasts, 

pilots and aircraft owners who are dedicated to Sharing the Spirit of Aviation by promoting the 

continued growth of aviation, the preservation of its history and a commitment to aviation’s 

future. EAA and VAA programs, activities and events are known throughout the world for 

Preserving the heritage of aviation, Promoting access to flight, Protecting the right to fly, 

Preparing for the future of aviation, and of our Passion for aviation safety and education.

EAA and VAA are requesting a 90 day extension (until August 19, 2011) to the comment period 

stated in this docket.

EAA and VAA fully support the FAA’s mission to ensure the safety of persons and property on 

the surface through the issuance of Airworthiness Directives when appropriate. In this specific 

case, there are several questions that should have been addressed in the proposed AD docket but 

were not. Without this additional information the public will be unable to provide reasonable 

feedback to this proposed AD. Specifically:

• What is the history of Service Difficulty Reports (SDRs) on this issue?

• Have any SDRs been received by the FAA from field A&Ps, IAs, repair stations, or 

other sources other than the manufacturer (Burl’s Aircraft, LLC)?

• What percentage of the wings mentioned in the proposed AD were damaged by cracks 

or other mechanical damage, rather than corrosion?

• The Service Bulletin (SB) submitted by the manufacturer to the FAA has not been 

published, as of today, by the manufacturer.
P.O. BOX 3086 OSHKOSH, WI 54903-3086 • Tel 920.426.6522 • Fax 920.426.6560 • WWW.EAA.ORG

In conclusion, EAA and VAA are requesting a 90 day extension to the comment period in order 

for the FAA to publish the missing information in the docket and for EAA and VAA to conduct 

further research on this issue.

 

Please contact H.G. Frautschy, Executive Director, Vintage Aircraft Association (VAA) for any 

questions regarding this extension and information request. 920-426-4825, 

hgfrautschy@eaa.org. 

Thank you for this opportunity to comment on this proposed AD. 

Sincerely,

Randy Hansen H.G. Frautschy

Government Relations Director Executive Director

EAA VAA
Editorial Note on Part 27
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 27 appear by T.D. ATF-474, 67 FR 11231, Mar. 13, 2002, and T.D. ATF-479, 67 FR 30799, May 8, 2002.

§ 27.256 Foreign producer ownership information. ( a ) *When required.* A foreign producer must provide, as part of the registration required by § 27.254, the identifying information set forth in paragraph (b) of this section only when one or more of the individuals or entities holding an ownership interest in the foreign producer of 10 percent or more also holds an ownership interest in any distilled spirits operation, winery, or brewery in the United States or in any other foreign producer that has assigned or will assign CBMA tax benefits for any calendar year in which the registering foreign producer also assigns such benefits. Otherwise, the foreign producer must only certify that this scenario does not apply.
( b ) *Identifying information* — ( 1 ) *Individual owner.* For each individual holding an ownership interest of 10 percent or more in the foreign producer, the foreign producer must provide the following information when required by paragraph (a) of this section: ( i ) The name, address, and phone number of the individual.
( ii ) [Reserved]
( 2 ) *Other entity.* For each entity (other than an individual) holding an ownership interest of 10 percent or more in the foreign producer, the foreign producer must provide the following information when required by paragraph (a) of this section: ( i ) The name, address, and phone number of the entity;
( ii ) If the entity is a U.S. entity, and if the entity has such a number, the entity's Employer Identification Number issued by the U.S. Internal Revenue Service; and
( iii ) If the entity is a foreign entity, and if the entity has such a number, the Dun & Bradstreet Data Universal Numbering System number of the entity.
UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
 Washington, D.C. 20549
 
 Form 6-K
 
 Report of Foreign Private Issuer
Pursuant to Rule 13a-16 or 15d-16 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
 July 14, 2011
 Commission File Number 001-32945
 
 WNS (HOLDINGS) LIMITED
 (Exact name of registrant as specified in the charter)
 Not Applicable  (Translation of Registrants name into English)
 Jersey, Channel Islands  (Jurisdiction of incorporation or organization)
 
 Gate 4, Godrej & Boyce Complex
Pirojshanagar, Vikroli (W)
Mumbai 400 079, India
+91-22-6797-6100  (Address of principal executive offices)
  Form 20-F þ
    
    Form 40-F o
 o
 o
  Yes o
    
    No þ
 Not applicable.




---



##### 



Other Events
  Exhibit
 99.1
    
    Announcement of release of unaudited fiscal 2011 results under IFRS.99.2
    
    Unaudited fiscal 2011 IFRS supplementary financial information.




---



##### 



SIGNATURE
   WNS (HOLDINGS) LIMITEDBy:
    /s/ Alok MisraName:
    Alok MisraTitle:
    Group Chief Financial Officer




---



##### 



EXHIBIT INDEX
 99.1
    
    Announcement of release of unaudited fiscal 2011 results under IFRS.99.2
    
    Unaudited fiscal 2011 IFRS supplementary financial information.
Editorial Note on Part 28
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 28 appear by T.D. ATF-477, 67 FR 18087 through 18090, Apr. 15, 2002.

§ 28.62 Bond, Form 5100.30. ( a ) *Requirement for bond.* If a person other than the proprietor of the bonded premises withdraws distilled spirits or wine without payment of tax, as authorized by § 28.91(a)(1), (2), (3), (5), or § 28.121(a), (b), (c), or (d), the exporter shall file a continuing bond, TTB Form 5100.30, as provided in § 28.51.
( b ) *Penal sum of bond.* The penal sum of the bond shall be sufficient to cover the tax on the maximum quantity of distilled spirits and wine that may remain unaccounted for at any one time. However, the maximum penal sum of the bond shall not exceed $200,000, but in no case shall the penal sum be less than $1,000. Distilled spirits and wine withdrawn for exportation, use on vessels or aircraft, transfer to a customs bonded warehouse, or transfer to and deposit in a foreign-trade zone, shall remain unaccounted for until the evidence of exportation, use, deposit, transfer, or loss in transit has been filed with the appropriate TTB officer.
( c ) *Apportioning bonds.* If the bond, Form 5100.30, is in less than the maximum penal sum, the principal shall apportion the bond, in accordance with the requirements on the bond form. The exporter may reapportion the bond coverage, if changing conditions make this necessary, by filing a consent of surety, TTB Form 5000.18, in accordance with its instructions.
( d ) *Withdrawal of wine for transfer to a customs bonded warehouse; consent of surety.* An exporter with a bond on Form 5100.30 executed before April 1, 1981, shall obtain a consent of surety on Form 5000.18 before withdrawing wine without payment of tax from a bonded wine cellar for transfer to a customs bonded warehouse. The consent shall be executed in accordance with § 28.54 and filed in accordance with instructions on the form. Exporters with bonds executed on or after April 1, 1981, do not need this consent of surety, because such bonds automatically apply to withdrawals for transfer to customs bonded warehouses.
(Sec. 201, Pub. L. 85-859, 72 Stat. 1352, as amended, 1362, as amended, 1380, as amended, 1381, 1382 (26 U.S.C. 5175, 5214, 5362) sec. 3. Pub. L. 91-659, 84 Stat. 1965, as amended (26 U.S.C. 5066, 5370, 5371))
[T.D. ATF-88, 46 FR 39815, Aug. 5, 1991, as amended by T.D. ATF-413, 64 FR 46845, Aug. 27, 1999; T.D. TTB-8, 69 FR 3832, Jan. 27, 2004; T.D. TTB-146, 82 FR 1134, Jan. 4, 2017]
§ 31.34 Wholesale dealer in beer. ( a ) *General.* Except as otherwise provided in paragraph (b) of this section, every person who sells or offers for sale beer, but not distilled spirits or wines, to another dealer is a wholesale dealer in beer for purposes of this part. Every wholesale dealer in beer must comply with the registration and other requirements of this part, unless the dealer is covered by an applicable exemption under subpart D of this part.
( b ) *Persons not deemed to be wholesale dealers in beer.* The following persons are not wholesale dealers in beer within the meaning of this part: ( 1 ) A person who does not sell or offer for sale distilled spirits or wines and sells beer or offers beer for sale only as provided in §§ 31.61 through 31.63, § 31.65(a), § 31.66, or § 31.67; or
( 2 ) A person returning beer for credit, refund or exchange as provided in § 31.56.
(26 U.S.C. 5121)
###### Editorial Note on Part 44

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 44 appear by T.D. ATF-464, 66 FR 43480, Aug. 20, 2001, and T.D. ATF-480, 67 FR 30801-30803, May 8, 2002.

#### § 44.149 Monthly.

A report for each full month shall be made on or before the 20th day following the end of the month covered in the report.

(72 Stat. 1422; 26 U.S.C. 5722)
EXHIBIT 31.2



CERTIFICATION



I, Peter Mak, certify that:



1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of Teda Travel Incorporated;



2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;



3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;



4. The registrant's other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:



(a)

Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;



(b)

Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and



(c)

Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter (the registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control over financial reporting; and



5. The registrant's other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):



(a)

All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and



(b)

Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting.





Dated:

August 19, 2003



/s/ PETERMAK

Peter Mak, Chief Financial Officer
#### W. A. Brockhurst Company, Inc., Plaintiff, v. City of Yonkers et al., Appellants, et al., Defendants, and First National Bank & Trust Company of *779Yonkers, impleaded Defendant, Respondent.

No opinion. Present ■—Hagarty, Carswell, Johnston, Adel and Taylor, JJ. [180 Misc. 820.]
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY ELEV

 534.43

 534.54

 534.50

 534.29

 534.15

 533.97

 533.70

 533.36

 533.07

 532.79

 532.50

 532.15

 531.95

 531.82

 531.80

 531.40

 530.86

 530.32

 529.87

 529.62

 529.97

 530.30

 530.37

 530.48

 530.42

 530.52

 530.55

 530.55

 530.52

 530.50

 530.53

 331.5

 331.9

 331.7

 330.9

 330.4

 329.7

 328.7

 327.4

 326.3

 325.3

 324.2

 322.9

 322.1

 321.7

 321.6

 320.1

 318.1

 316.1

 314.5

 313.5

 314.8

 316.0

 316.3

 316.7

 316.5

 316.9

 317.0

 317.0

 316.9

 316.8

 316.9

STORAGE

+0.7

+0.4

-0.2

-0.8

-0.5

-0.7

-1.0

-1.3

-1.1

-1.0

-1.1

-1.3

-0.7

-0.5

-0.1

-1.5

-2.0

-2.0

-1.7

-0.9

+1.3

+1.2

+0.3

+0.4

-0.2

+0.4

+0.1

+0.0

-0.1

-0.1

+0.1

CHANGE

915

702

461

264

436

392

295

238

371

388

424

347

398

326

618

103

211

468

375

427

1,330

1,312

873

946

576

826

671

605

539

628

833

INFLOW

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

MADERA

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

SPILL

 450

 363

 417

 557

 598

 633

 705

 764

 806

 806

 858

 895

 658

 459

 543

 742

 961

 1,101

 858

 540

 344

 391

 450

 450

 392

 351

 321

 301

 301

 376

 480

FRIANT-KERN

 1

 28

 20

 7

 6

 2

 2

 19

 15

 11

 13

 12

 17

 12

 13

 10

 13

 19

 2

 2

 2

 12

 7

 5

 8

 2

 7

 17

 7

 2

 11

C.F.S.

 .01

 .23

 .16

 .06

 .05

 .02

 .02

 .16

 .12

 .09

 .11

 .10

 .14

 .10

 .11

 .08

 .11

 .16

 .02

 .02

 .02

 .10

 .06

 .04

 .07

 .02

 .06

 .14

 .06

 .02

 .09

INCHES

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 1.14

 .11

 .39

 .19

 .00

 .00

 .03

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .01

 .00

PRECIP

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

JANUARY 2012 MILLERTON LAKE DAILY OPERATIONS RUN DATE: February 1, 2012

IN LAKE

EVAPORATION

INCHES

C.F.S.

COMPUTED*

1000 ACRE-FEET

RELEASE - C.F.S. 

TOTALS -13.8 17,298 0 17,871 0 304 2.55 1.87

ACRE-FEET -13,847 34,311 0 35,447 0 603

COMMENTS:

* COMPUTED INFLOW IS THE SUM OF CHANGE IN STORAGE, RELEASES, PUMPING AND EVAPORATION.

SUMMARY

RELEASE (ACRE-FEET)

CANALS

FRIANT-KERN

MADERA

 35,447

 0 47,554

PRECIPITATION

THIS MONTH =

JULY 1, 2011 TO DATE = 4.25

 330.7

 12,107 1.87

CANALS

AT FRIANT

TOTAL RELEASES

OUTLET

 101

 101

 101

 101

 100

 100

 100

 100

 100

 99

 99

 99

 99

 99

 99

 99

 245

 350

 350

 348

 336

 296

 286

 287

 287

 287

 287

 287

 287

 287

 287

RIVER

 6,104

 12,107

RIVER
Opinion issued July 6, 2023

In The

Court of Appeals 

For The 

First District of Texas 

————————————

NO. 01-23-00219-CV

———————————

SHERRIFU DRAMMEH, Appellant

V.

SBH REALTY INVESTMENT, LLC, Appellee

On Appeal from the County Civil Court at Law No. 2

Harris County, Texas

Trial Court Case No. 1197633

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Appellant’s brief was due to be filed on April 24, 2023. On May 2, 2023, 

the Court issued a notice that we might dismiss the appeal if appellant did not file a 

brief or motion for extension on or before May 12, 2023. Appellant did not file a 

timely brief or request an extension. 
2

Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution. See TEX. R.

APP. P. 38.8(a)(1) (authorizing dismissal for failure to file brief); TEX. R. APP. P.

42.3(b) (allowing involuntary dismissal of case). We dismiss any pending motions 

as moot.

PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Justices Kelly, Hightower, and Countiss.
Editorial Note on Part 478
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 478 appear by T.D. ATF-411, 64 FR 17291, Apr. 9, 1999, T.D. ATF-487, 68 FR 3750, Jan. 24, 2003, and ATF-11F, 73 FR 57240, Oct. 2, 2008.

§ 478.28 Transportation of destructive devices and certain firearms. ( a ) The Director may authorize a person to transport in interstate or foreign commerce any destructive device, machine gun, short-barreled shotgun, or short-barreled rifle, if he finds that such transportation is reasonably necessary and is consistent with public safety and applicable State and local law. A person who desires to transport in interstate or foreign commerce any such device or weapon shall submit a written request so to do, in duplicate, to the Director. The request shall contain: ( 1 ) A complete description and identification of the device or weapon to be transported;
( 2 ) A statement whether such transportation involves a transfer of title;
( 3 ) The need for such transportation;
( 4 ) The approximate date such transportation is to take place;
( 5 ) The present location of such device or weapon and the place to which it is to be transported;
( 6 ) The mode of transportation to be used (including, if by common or contract carrier, the name and address of such carrier); and
( 7 ) Evidence that the transportation or possession of such device or weapon is not inconsistent with the laws at the place of destination.
( b ) No person shall transport any destructive device, machine gun, short-barreled shotgun, or short-barreled rifle in interstate or foreign commerce under the provisions of this section until he has received specific authorization so to do from the Director. Authorization granted under this section does not carry or import relief from any other statutory or regulatory provision relating to firearms.
( c ) This section shall not be construed as requiring licensees to obtain authorization to transport destructive devices, machine guns, short-barreled shotguns, and short-barreled rifles in interstate or foreign commerce: *Provided,* That in the case of a licensed importer, licensed manufacturer, or licensed dealer, such a licensee is qualified under the National Firearms Act (see also Part 479 of this chapter) and this part to engage in the business with respect to the device or weapon to be transported, and that in the case of a licensed collector, the device or weapon to be transported is a curio or relic.
[33 FR 18555, Dec. 14, 1968. Redesignated at 40 FR 16385, Apr. 15, 1975, and amended by T.D. ATF-138, 48 FR 35399, Aug. 4, 1983]
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE 

WARREN SMALL, 

 

Defendant Below, 

Appellant, 

v. 

STATE OF DELAWARE, 

Plaintiff Below, 

Appellee.

§ 

§ No. 96, 2020 

§ 

§ 

§ 

§ Court Below–Superior Court 

§ of the State of Delaware 

§ 

§ Cr. ID No. 1209020733 (N) 

§ 

§ 

 

 Submitted: March 18, 2020 

 Decided: March 23, 2020 

Before SEITZ, Chief Justice; VALIHURA, and MONTGOMERY-REEVES, 

Justices. 

ORDER 

Upon consideration of the notice to show cause and the appellant’s response, 

it appears to the Court that: 

(1) On March 6, 2020, the Court received Warren Small’s notice of appeal 

from a February 4, 2020 Superior Court violation of probation sentencing order. To 

be timely filed, the notice of appeal had to be received by the Clerk or a Deputy 

Clerk in any county on or before March 5, 2020.1

 

1

 Del. Supr. Ct. R. 6(a); Del. Supr. Ct. R. 10(a); Del. Supr. Ct. R. 11(a). 
2 

(2) On March 6, 2020, the Chief Deputy Clerk issued a notice directing 

Small to show cause why his appeal should not be dismissed as untimely. Small 

filed a response to the notice to show cause, stating that he had placed his notice of 

appeal in the prison mail on February 25, 2020. Small attached a copy of his inmate 

statement, which shows that his account was charged for postage on February 27, 

2020. 

(3) Time is a jurisdictional requirement.2

 A notice of appeal must be 

received by the Court within the applicable time period to be effective.3

 An 

appellant’s pro se status does not excuse a failure to comply strictly with the 

jurisdictional requirements of Supreme Court Rule 6.4

 Unless an appellant can 

demonstrate that the failure to file a timely notice of appeal is attributable to courtrelated personnel, the appeal cannot be considered.5

 It is undisputed that Small’s 

notice of appeal was received by the Court after the thirty-day deadline. Delaware 

has declined to adopt the prison mailbox rule, wherein a pro se prisoner’s notice of 

appeal is deemed “filed” at the moment it is delivered to prison authorities for 

forwarding to the Court.6

 

 

2 Carr v. State, 554 A.2d 778, 779 (Del.), cert. denied, 493 U.S. 829 (1989). 

3

 Del. Supr. Ct. R. 10(a). 

4 Smith v. State, 47 A.3d 481, 485-87 (Del. 2012). 

5 Bey v. State, 402 A.2d 362, 363 (Del. 1979). 

6 Smith v. State, 47 A.3d 481, 483-87 (Del. 2012). 
3 

(4) The record does not reflect that Small’s failure to file a timely notice of 

appeal is attributable to court-related personnel. Consequently, this case does not 

fall within the exception to the general rule that mandates the timely filing of a notice 

of appeal. Thus, the Court concludes that this appeal must be dismissed. 

 NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, under Supreme Court 

Rule 29(b), that the appeal is DISMISSED. 

BY THE COURT: 

/s/ Collins J. Seitz, Jr. 

 Chief Justice