alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
## COURT OF APPEALS SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS FORT WORTH NO. 02 - 10 - 00399 - CR

ROBERT CHRISTOPHER WILLIAMS APPELLANT

V. THE STATE OF TEXAS STATE

------------ FROM CRIMINAL DISTRICT COURT NO. 1 OF TARRANT COUNTY

------------ 

### MEMORANDUM OPINION 1

-- -------- Appellant Robert Christopher Williams pled guilty pursuant to a plea bargain to felony driving while intoxicated , and the trial court sentenced him to ten years’ confinement, probated for ten years. Almost three years later, the State filed a pet ition for revocation, alleging several violations of the conditions of community supervision. Appellant pled true to allegations that he failed to report in the months of June, October, and December 2009 and February, May, June,

1 See Tex. R. App. P. 47.4.2

and July 2010; failed to p ay community supervision fees in the months of May, June, July, August, September, November, and December 2009 and January, February, March, April, May, June, and July 2010; and failed to submit urine samples on July 10, 2009, and during the weeks of March 18, March 25, April 22, April 29, September 2, September 9, September 16, September 23, and September 30 of 2009. After a hearing, the trial court revoked Appellant’s community supervision and sentenced him to eight years’ confinement

. Appellant’s court

- appointed appellate counsel has filed a motion to withdraw as counsel and a br ief in support of that motion. In the brief, counsel avers that, in his professional opin ion, this appeal is frivolous. Counsel’s brief and motion meet the requirements of Ande rs v. Californi a 2 by presenting a professional evaluation of the record demonstrating why there are no arguable grounds for relief. 3 This court afforded Appellant the opportunity to file a pro se response to the Anders brief, and he did so. The State als o filed a letter brief in response to Appellant’s pro se allegations. Once an appellant’s court

- appointed counsel files a motion to withdraw on the ground that the appeal is frivolous and fulfills the requirements of Anders , we are obligated to undertake a n independent examination of the record to see if

2 386 U.S. 738, 87 S. Ct. 1396 (1967).

3 See Stafford v. State , 813 S.W.2d 503, 510

– 11 & n.3 (T ex. Crim. App. 1991).3

there is any arguable ground that may be raised on h is behalf. 4 Only then may we grant counsel’s motion to withdraw. 5 We have carefully reviewed the record , counsel’s brief , Appellant’s pro se
response, an d the State’s letter brief

. We agree with counsel that the appeal is wholl y frivolous and without merit. We find nothing in the record that might arguably support the appeal. 6 Consequently, we grant the motion to withdraw and affirm the trial court’s ju dgment.

PER CURIAM
PANEL: DAUPHINOT, GARDNER, and WALKER, JJ. DO NOT PUBLISH Tex. R. App

. P. 47.2(b )
DELIVERED: September 15 , 2011

4 See id. at 511.

5 See Penson v. Ohio , 488 U.S. 75, 82

– 83, 109 S. Ct. 346, 351 (1988).

6 See Bledsoe v. State , 178 S.W.3d 824, 827 (Tex. Crim. App. 2005).
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY HIGH

 342

 344

 346

 337

 336

 335

 338

 331

 329

 333

 349

 334

 336

 340

 338

 337

 329

 326

 326

 327

 325

 322

 319

 321

 319

 317

 315

 317

 324

 321

 317

 316

 317

 320

 316

 312

 313

 314

 314

 312

 311

 312

 317

 317

 318

 314

 308

 310

 311

 307

 305

 298

 302

 300

 304

 302

 304

 304

 303

 306

 304

 307

 323

 326

 326

 323

 320

 323

 324

 321

 319

 320

 323

 323

 323

 326

 324

 322

 319

 318

 316

 313

 311

 311

 311

 311

 311

 309

 308

 308

 311

 309

 309

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

MARCH 2022 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: April 4, 2022

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

HOLLAND TRACT ON OLD RIVER
### SUBCHAPTER II—NATIVE HAWAIIANS AND ALASKA NATIVES
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### National Science Foundation

In accordance with the Federal Advisory Committee Act (Pub. L. 92-463, as amended), the National Science Foundation announces the following meeting: 

*Name:*                     Advisory Committee for Education and Human Resources (#1119).                 

*Date/Time:*                     May 4, 2011; 8:30 a.m. to 5 p.m.; May 5, 2011; 8:30 a.m. to 1 p.m.                 

*Place:*                     The Arlington Hilton, 950 North Stafford Street, Gallery II, Mezzanine Level, Arlington, VA 22203.                 

*Type of Meeting:*                     Open.                 

*Contact Person:*                     James Colby, National Science Foundation, 4201 Wilson Boulevard, Arlington, VA 22230, (703) 292-5331,                     *jcolby@nsf.gov.*

*Purpose of Meeting:*                     To provide advice with respect to the Foundation's science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) education and human resources programming.                 

## Agenda 

### May 4, 2011 (Wednesday) 

Report from the NSF Assistant Director for Education and Human Resources. 

Update on Strategic Vision Working Groups: 
    - Putting the “STEM” in STEM Education.
    - Preparing and Sustaining K-12 STEM Educators.
    - Preparing and Shaping the STEM Workforce.

Overview and Discussion: FY 2012 Budget Request. 

Visit with NSF Director and Deputy Director. 

### May 5, 2011 (Thursday) 

Receipt of Committee of Visitor Reports for: 
    - Math and Science Partnership program.
    - Federal Cyber Service: Scholarship for Service program.
    - NSF Scholarships in Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics.

Discussion of future STEM program planning. 

Adjournment. 

Dated: April 7, 2011. 

Susanne Bolton, 

Committee Management Officer.

[FR Doc. 2011-8723 Filed 4-11-11; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 7555-01-P
###### Editorial Note on Part 44

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 44 appear by T.D. ATF-464, 66 FR 43480, Aug. 20, 2001, and T.D. ATF-480, 67 FR 30801-30803, May 8, 2002.

#### § 44.106 Change in officers or directors of a corporation.

Where there is any change in the officers or directors of a corporation operating the business of an export warehouse proprietor, the proprietor shall furnish to the appropriate TTB officer notice, in writing, of the election of the new officers or directors within 30 days after such election.

(72 Stat. 1421; 26 U.S.C. 5712)
1

In The

Court of Appeals

Ninth District of Texas at Beaumont

________________

NO. 09-15-00318-CR 

________________

IN RE MARVIN HOLMES

__________________________________________________________________

Original Proceeding

Criminal District Court of Jefferson County, Texas

Trial Cause No. 08-04992-A

__________________________________________________________________

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Relator Marvin Holmes filed a pro se petition for writ of mandamus, in 

which he alleges that the trial court illegally sentenced him after he pleaded no 

contest pursuant to a plea bargain agreement. Holmes has not demonstrated that he 

is clearly entitled to mandamus relief from this Court. See State ex rel. Hill v. 

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Dist., 34 S.W.3d 924, 927 (Tex. Crim. App. 2001)

(orig. proceeding) (To demonstrate entitlement to a writ of mandamus, a relator 

must establish that the trial court failed to perform a ministerial duty, and that 
2

relator has no other adequate legal remedy.). Accordingly, we deny relief on the 

petition for writ of mandamus.

PETITION DENIED.

PER CURIAM

Submitted August 25, 2015

Opinion Delivered August 26, 2015

Do Not Publish

Before McKeithen, C.J., Horton and Johnson, JJ.
Exhibit 3.45.1
 SECOND AMENDED AND RESTATED
ARTICLES OF INCORPORATION
 NAVIOS INTERNATIONAL INC.
 Corporation
 1.
    
    The name of the Corporation is NAVIOS INTERNATIONAL INC.2.
    
    The Articles of Incorporation of the Corporation were filed with the Registrar of Corporations
of The Republic of The Marshall Islands on December 11, 1998, which is the date upon which
existence of the Corporation commenced.3.
    
    The Articles of Merger of the Corporation were filed on December 23, 1998.4.
    
    The Amended and Restated Articles of Incorporation were filed with the Registrar of Corporations
on August 31, 2000.5.
    
    The purposes of the amendments effected hereby are to eliminate certain restrictions regarding
the management of the Corporation, including the number of directors, the specification of certain
corporate actions for which approval of at least four of the directors of the Corporation was
required, the method of election of directors and the quorum for shareholders and directors
meetings.6.
    
    This Amendment and Restatement of the Articles of Incorporation has been authorized by actions
of the Board of Directors and Shareholders of the
Corporation.7.
    
    The Articles of Incorporation as heretofore amended and restated are hereby further amended in
their entirety and restated as follows:
 A.
    
    The name of the Corporation is NAVIOS INTERNATIONAL INC.B.
    
    The purpose of the Corporation is to engage in any lawful act or activity for which corporations
may now or hereafter be organized under the
Marshall Islands Business Corporations Act.C.
    
    The registered address of the Corporation in the Marshall Islands is Trust Company Complex,
Ajeltake Island, P.O. Box 1405, Majuro, Marshall Islands, MH96960. The name of the Corporations
registered agent at such address is the Trust Company of the Marshall Islands, Inc.




---



##### 



D.
    
    The aggregate number of shares of stock that the Corporation is authorized to issue is 500 (Five
Hundred) shares in registered form with a par value
of Ten Cents ($0.10) per share.E.
    
    The Board of Directors as well as the shareholders of the Corporation shall have the authority to
adopt, amend or repeal the Bylaws of the
Corporation.F.
    
    The Corporation shall have every power which a corporation now or hereafter organized under the
Marshall Islands Business Corporations Act
may have.
 st
 NAVIOS INTERNATIONAL INC.
    
    NAVIOS INTERNATIONAL INC.By:

/s/
Anthony R. Whitworth
    
    By:

/s/
Bruce C. HoagAnthony R. Whitworth,
    
    

    Bruce C. Hoag,President
    
    

    Secretary
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff — Appellee, v. Duwayne David CUNNINGHAM, Defendant — Appellant.

No. 05-10029.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted Feb. 13, 2006.*

Decided Feb. 21, 2006.

Paul J. Seave, Esq., USSAC — Office of the U.S. Attorney, Sacramento, CA, for Plaintiff-Appellee.

FPDCA — Federal Public Defender’s Office, Sacramento, CA, for Defendant-Appellant.

Before: FERNANDEZ, RYMER, and BYBEE, Circuit Judges.

*

This panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

MEMORANDUM **

DuWayne David Cunningham appeals from the revocation of his supervised release and the 24-month sentence imposed on the revocation. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we affirm.

Cunningham contends that the government breached an oral plea agreement by failing to recommend that he be sentenced at the low end of the guideline range. Cunningham did not present this contention in the district court.

Claims pertaining to the breach of a plea agreement will not generally be considered for the first time on appeal. *See United States v. Flores-Payon,*942 F.2d 556, 560 (9th Cir.1991). Although we may make an exception to this rule where plain error has occurred, *see id.,*in this case we are unable to conclude that (1) there was actual error; (2) the error was plain; and (3) the error affected the defendant’s substantial rights. *See United States v. Olano,*507 U.S. 725, 732, 113 S.Ct. 1770, 123 L.Ed.2d 508 (1993). We therefore affirm the sentence.

AFFIRMED

**

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
Exhibit 32








SECTION 1350 CERTIFICATION





Each of the undersigned, S.W. Yong, President and Chief Executive Officer of Trio-Tech International, a California corporation (the “Company”), and Victor H.M. Ting, Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, do hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of his knowledge (1) the quarterly report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the nine months ended March 31, 2011, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and (2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.








/s/ S. W. Yong


Name: S. W. Yong


Title:President and Chief Executive Officer


Dated: May 16, 2011








/s/  Victor H.M. Ting


Name:Victor H.M. Ting


Title:Vice President and Chief Financial Officer


Dated: May 16, 2011








A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY ELEV

 995.13

 995.01

 995.06

 995.34

 995.56

 995.68

 995.76

 995.93

 996.08

 996.17

 996.39

 996.67

 996.80

 996.88

 996.92

 996.98

 996.85

 996.69

 997.11

 997.23

 996.84

 997.06

 997.32

 997.53

 997.78

 997.91

 997.94

 998.09

 998.30

 998.51

 998.72

 1,426.9

 1,425.8

 1,426.2

 1,428.8

 1,430.7

 1,431.8

 1,432.6

 1,434.1

 1,435.4

 1,436.3

 1,438.3

 1,440.8

 1,442.0

 1,442.7

 1,443.1

 1,443.6

 1,442.4

 1,441.0

 1,444.8

 1,445.9

 1,442.3

 1,444.3

 1,446.7

 1,448.6

 1,450.9

 1,452.1

 1,452.3

 1,453.7

 1,455.6

 1,457.5

 1,459.4

STORAGE

-0.4

-1.1

+0.5

+2.5

+2.0

+1.1

+0.7

+1.5

+1.4

+0.8

+2.0

+2.5

+1.2

+0.7

+0.4

+0.5

-1.2

-1.4

+3.8

+1.1

-3.5

+2.0

+2.4

+1.9

+2.3

+1.2

+0.3

+1.4

+1.9

+1.9

+1.9

CHANGE

1,844

1,759

1,943

2,762

2,087

1,940

1,830

2,270

2,320

1,997

2,504

2,590

2,541

2,398

2,329

2,456

2,406

2,318

2,499

2,411

2,465

2,905

3,177

3,129

3,040

2,651

2,816

3,153

3,084

3,471

3,291

INFLOW

 1,968

 2,247

 1,668

 1,465

 1,039

 1,341

 1,408

 1,444

 1,598

 1,542

 1,452

 1,244

 1,872

 1,956

 2,102

 2,112

 2,941

 2,979

 508

 1,781

 4,168

 1,817

 1,909

 2,087

 1,835

 1,984

 2,598

 2,380

 2,015

 2,422

 2,241

POWER

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

SPILL

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

OUTLET

 58

 58

 47

 23

 47

 53

 58

 53

 38

 44

 47

 67

 76

 76

 44

 70

 59

 70

 71

 79

 82

 82

 76

 79

 59

 71

 80

 83

 103

 83

 83

C.F.S.

 .20

 .20

 .16

 .08

 .16

 .18

 .20

 .18

 .13

 .15

 .16

 .23

 .26

 .26

 .15

 .24

 .20

 .24

 .24

 .27

 .28

 .28

 .26

 .27

 .20

 .24

 .27

 .28

 .35

 .28

 .28

INCHES

 .00

 .07

 .30

 .30

 .01

 .00

 .00

 .01

 .20

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

PRECIP

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

MAY 2003 NEW MELONES LAKE DAILY OPERATIONS RUN DATE: March 12, 2004

IN LAKE

EVAPORATION

INCHES

C.F.S.

COMPUTED*

1000 ACRE-FEET

RELEASE - C.F.S.

TOTALS +32.3 78,386 60,123 0 0 2,019 6.88 .89

ACRE-FEET +32,300 155,479 119,254 0 0 4,005

COMMENTS:

* COMPUTED INFLOW IS THE SUM OF CHANGE IN STORAGE, RELEASES AND EVAPORATION.

SUMMARY

RELEASE (ACRE-FEET)

POWER 119,254

SPILL 0

OUTLET

TOTAL

 0

 119,254

PRECIPITATION

THIS MONTH =

TO DATE =

 .89

JULY 1, 2002 24.20

 1,427.2
EX-4.1




	
	 Exhibit 4.1
  








  
 SPI ENERGY CO., LTD. 
 Number 

Share(s) 
 -[no. of shares]- 
 Incorporated under the laws of
the Cayman Islands 
 Share capital is US$50,000 divided into 5,000,000,000 Shares of a par value of US$0.00001
each 
 THIS IS TO CERTIFY THAT [name of shareholder] is the registered holder of [no. of shares] Shares(s) in
the above-named Company subject to the Memorandum and Articles of Association thereof, 
 EXECUTED on behalf of
the said Company on the day of 2015 by: 
 DIRECTOR 








	
	 






  
 Transfer I (the transferor) for the value received do hereby transfer to (the Transferee) the shares standing in my name in the undertaking called SPI ENERGY CO., LTD. To hold the same
unto the Transferee Dated Signed By the Transferor in the presence of: Witness Transferor
Renewable Energy System Tax Credit, is available at: 

http://www.energy.utah.gov/
Editorial Note on Part 22
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 22 appear by T.D. ATF-435, 66 FR 5476, Jan. 19, 2001 and T.D. ATF-463 and T.D. ATF-462, 66 FR 42733, 42736, Aug. 15, 2001.

§ 22.68 Notice of permanent discontinuance. A permittee who permanently discontinues the use of tax-free alcohol shall file a written notice with the appropriate TTB officer to cover the discontinuance. The notice will be accompanied by the permit, and contain— ( 1 ) A request to cancel the permit,
( 2 ) A statement of the disposition made, as provided in § 22.154, of all tax-free and recovered alcohol, and
( 3 ) The date of discontinuance.
(Approved by the Office of Management and Budget under control number 1512-0335) [T.D. ATF-199, 50 FR 9183, Mar. 6, 1985, as amended by T.D. ATF-443, 66 FR 13015, Mar. 2, 2001]
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY ELEV

 121.80

 121.74

 121.31

 121.96

 122.95

 123.45

 123.19

 121.69

 121.64

 121.14

 121.01

 121.27

 121.84

 122.82

 123.46

 122.80

 122.93

 122.75

 122.34

 122.36

 122.31

 122.25

 122.18

 121.82

 121.99

 122.31

 122.26

 121.90

 121.62

 121.21

 120.69

 7,257

 7,232

 7,051

 7,324

 7,769

 8,003

 7,880

 7,211

 7,190

 6,980

 6,925

 7,034

 7,274

 7,710

 8,007

 7,701

 7,760

 7,679

 7,494

 7,503

 7,481

 7,454

 7,422

 7,265

 7,337

 7,481

 7,458

 7,299

 7,181

 7,009

 6,797

STORAGE

-111

-25

-181

+273

+445

+234

-123

-669

-21

-210

-55

+109

+240

+436

+297

-306

+59

-81

-185

+9

-22

-27

-32

-157

+72

+144

-23

-159

-118

-172

-212

CHANGE

1,364

1,349

1,236

1,444

1,529

1,424

1,255

991

1,275

1,179

1,253

1,340

1,406

1,503

1,413

1,112

1,294

1,223

1,164

1,272

1,251

1,274

1,270

1,209

1,321

1,345

1,271

1,204

1,052

1,011

1,007

INFLOW

 1,334

 1,276

 1,248

 1,245

 1,245

 1,245

 1,247

 1,248

 1,206

 1,205

 1,201

 1,204

 1,204

 1,204

 1,202

 1,205

 1,204

 1,204

 1,197

 1,207

 1,202

 1,207

 1,205

 1,207

 1,204

 1,191

 1,202

 1,204

 1,030

 1,011

 1,023

POWER

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

SPILL

 60

 60

 60

 60

 60

 60

 60

 60

 60

 60

 60

 60

 60

 60

 60

 60

 60

 60

 60

 60

 60

 60

 60

 60

 60

 60

 60

 60

 60

 60

 60

HATCHERY

 1

 1

 1

 1

 0

 1

 1

 0

 0

 0

 0

 1

 1

 0

 1

 1

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 0

 1

 1

 1

C.F.S.

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

DECEMBER 2013 LAKE NATOMA DAILY OPERATIONS RUN DATE: January 1, 2014

IN LAKE

EVAP

C.F.S.

COMPUTED*

ACRE-FEET

RELEASE - C.F.S.

TOTALS -571 39,241 37,217 0 1,860 19

ACRE-FEET -571 77,835 73,820 0 3,689 38

COMMENTS:

* COMPUTED INFLOW IS THE SUM OF CHANGE IN STORAGE, RELEASES AND EVAPORATION.

SUMMARY

RELEASES (ACRE-FEET)

POWER 73,820

SPILL 0

FOLSOM SOUTH CANAL

HATCHERY

 857

 3,689

 7,368

FOLSOM

SOUTH 

CANAL

 25

 25

 18

 0

 0

 0

 9

 20

 20

 20

 20

 20

 20

 19

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 20

 20

 20

 20

 20

 20

 20

 20

 26

 30

 432

 857

(1)

(1) INCHES OF EVAPORATION TAKEN FROM FOLSOM PAN.

RELEASES (ACRE-FEET)

TOTAL 78,366
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OF GANTOS, INC. AS OF, AND FOR THE FISCAL YEAR PERIOD
ENDED, FEBRUARY 1, 1997 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND ACCOMPANYING NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          FEB-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               FEB-01-1997
<CASH>                                           4,346
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   22,609
<ALLOWANCES>                                     (636)
<INVENTORY>                                     22,373
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                51,863
<PP&E>                                          62,379
<DEPRECIATION>                                (48,384)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  65,858
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           22,623
<BONDS>                                         11,940
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            76
<OTHER-SE>                                      31,219
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    65,858
<SALES>                                        184,366
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               184,366
<CGS>                                          147,022
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  147,022
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               2,332
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  2,337
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              2,337
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     2,337
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .31
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .31
        

</TABLE>