alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Editorial Note on Part 71
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 71 appear by T.D. ATF-414, 64 FR 49084, Sept. 10, 1999and T.D. ATF-463, 66 FR 42734, 42735, Aug. 15, 2001.

§ 71.108 Suspension, revocation, or annulment proceedings. ( a ) Upon receipt of the complete certified record of the hearing the appropriate TTB officer shall enter an order suspending, revoking, or annulling the permit (on TTB F 5000.5) or dismissing the proceedings in accordance with the administrative law judge's findings and decision, unless he disagrees with such findings and decision and files a petition with the Administrator, for review thereof, as provided in § 71.115. If the appropriate TTB officer files such petition, he shall withhold issuance of the order, pending the decision of the Administrator, upon receipt of which he shall issue the order in accordance therewith. A signed duplicate original of the order of the appropriate TTB officer shall be served upon the respondent and the original copy containing certificate of service shall be placed in the official record of the proceeding. In all proceedings in which a suspension is imposed, the appropriate TTB officer's order shall state the time when the suspension period set forth in the administrative law judge's decision shall commence and terminate.
( b ) In a case where the initial decision is made by the appropriate TTB officer in accordance with § 71.79, the appropriate TTB officer will also issue an order suspending, revoking or annulling the permit (on Form 5000.5), or dismissing the proceedings in accordance with his initial decision. A signed duplicated original of the decision and order of the appropriate TTB officer shall be served upon the respondent and the original copy placed in the official record of the proceeding. In all proceedings in which a suspension is imposed, the appropriate TTB officer's order shall state the time when the suspension period set forth in the initial decision shall commence and terminate.
[21 FR 1441, Mar. 6, 1956. Redesignated at 40 FR 16835, Apr. 15, 1975, and amended by T.D. ATF-199, 50 FR 9196, 9197, Mar. 6, 1985; T.D. ATF-244, 51 FR 45764, Dec. 22, 1986; T.D. ATF-374, 61 FR 29957, June 13, 1996; T.D. TTB-91, 76 FR 5482, Feb. 1, 2011]
Editorial Note on Part 555
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 555 appear by T.D. ATF-487, 68 FR 3748, Jan. 24, 2003.

§ 555.57 Change of control, change in responsible persons, and change of employees. ( a ) In the case of a corporation or association holding a license or permit under this part, if actual or legal control of the corporation or association changes, directly or indirectly, whether by reason of change in stock ownership or control (in the corporation holding a license or permit or in any other corporation), by operation of law, or in any other manner, the licensee or permittee shall, within 30 days of the change, give written notification executed under the penalties of perjury, to the Chief, Federal Explosives Licensing Center. Upon expiration of the license or permit, the corporation or association shall file an ATF F 5400.13 or an ATF F 5400.16 as required by § 555.45, and pay the fee prescribed in § 555.42(b) or § 555.43(b).
( b ) Each person holding the license or permit must report to the Chief, Federal Explosives Licensing Center, any change in responsible persons or employees authorized to possess explosive materials. Such report must be submitted within 30 days of the change and must include appropriate identifying information for each responsible person. Reports relating to newly hired employees authorized to possess explosive materials must be submitted on ATF F 5400.28 for each employee.
( c ) Upon receipt of a report, the Chief, Federal Explosives Licensing Center, will conduct a background check, if appropriate, in accordance with § 555.33.
( d ) The reports required by paragraph (b) of this section must be retained as part of a licensee's or permittee's permanent records for the period specified in § 555.121.
(Approved by the Office of Management and Budget under control number 1140-0074) [T.D. ATF-87, 46 FR 40384, Aug. 7, 1981, as amended by T.D. ATF-290, 54 FR 53054, Dec. 27, 1989; ATF No. 1, 68 FR 13786, Mar. 20, 2003; ATF 2013R-9F, 79 FR 46693, Aug. 11, 2014; ATF 2017R-21, 84 FR 13799, Apr. 8, 2019]
###### Editorial Note on Part 40

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 40 appear by T.D. ATF-460, 66 FR 39094-39096, July 27, 2001; T.D. ATF-464, 66 FR 43479, Aug. 20, 2001; and T.D. TTB-91, 76 FR 5479, Feb. 1, 2011.

#### § 40.391 Persons required to qualify.

Every person who manufactures cigarette paper, or makes up cigarette paper into tubes, except for his own personal use or consumption, must first qualify as a manufacturer of cigarette papers and tubes in accordance with the provisions of this subpart.

[ATF-467, 66 FR 49532, Sept. 28, 2001]
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

DAY HIGH

 2,328

 2,840

 3,021

 3,288

 3,582

 3,245

 2,896

 2,866

 2,504

 2,357

 2,499

 2,791

 2,981

 3,107

 3,467

 3,474

 3,268

 3,776

 3,111

 3,189

 3,344

 3,013

 2,654

 2,747

 2,914

 2,931

 3,160

 3,649

 3,828

 3,891

 788

 799

 775

 798

 825

 721

 744

 833

 723

 825

 882

 872

 942

 949

 913

 886

 982

 1,081

 934

 984

 1,114

 947

 987

 1,062

 1,074

 1,023

 1,026

 1,080

 1,023

 1,137

 1,132

 1,306

 1,436

 1,586

 1,681

 1,544

 1,495

 1,536

 1,353

 1,342

 1,407

 1,447

 1,470

 1,560

 1,623

 1,675

 1,781

 1,893

 1,763

 1,772

 1,876

 1,637

 1,567

 1,653

 1,662

 1,570

 1,657

 1,801

 1,823

 1,939

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

SEPTEMBER 2014 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: October 1, 2014

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

14 DAY

ACCUM

MEAN

14 DAY

AVG

MEAN

 18,703

 18,473

 18,280

 18,382

 18,617

 18,709

 18,711

 18,814

 18,899

 19,060

 19,315

 19,568

 19,854

 20,295

 20,786

 21,155

 21,500

 21,807

 21,889

 22,117

 22,498

 22,599

 22,813

 23,124

 23,379

 23,502

 23,689

 23,930

 24,130

 24,394

 1,336

 1,320

 1,306

 1,313

 1,330

 1,336

 1,337

 1,344

 1,350

 1,361

 1,380

 1,398

 1,418

 1,450

 1,485

 1,511

 1,536

 1,558

 1,564

 1,580

 1,607

 1,614

 1,630

 1,652

 1,670

 1,679

 1,692

 1,709

 1,724

 1,742

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

JERSEY POINT TOP ON THE SAN JOAQUIN RIVER
#### § 5.153 [Reserved]
#### James W. HUNT Petitioner, v. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE, Respondent.

No. 05-3130.

United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit.

Feb. 9, 2006.

Rehearing Denied March 7, 2006.

Before BRYSON, GAJARSA, and DYK, Circuit Judges.

Judgment

PER CURIAM

This CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED:

AFFIRMED. *See*Fed. Cir. R.36
Order entered January 3, 2020

In The 

## Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

No. 05 - 19 - 00999 - CR No. 05 - 19 - 0 1001 - CR PABLO PACHECORAMIREZ , Appellant

V. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee On A ppeal from the 292nd Judicial District Court

Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No s . F17 - 76295 - V & F17 - 76296 - V



### O RDER Before the Court is appellant’s December 31 , 2019 motion to deem the record complete. In the motion, appellant notes that a suppleme ntal reporter’s record con taining State’s exhibit s 10, 11, and 12 has been filed and that he is in agreement with the court reporter and the State that there was no State’s exhibit 36

. We G R ANT a

ppellant’s December second motion for extension of time and O RDER his brief due on or before January 31, 2020. /s/ ROBERT D. BURNS, III CHIEF JUSTICE
(No. 00123

#### In Re Application of Earnestine Walker

*Opinion filed November 14, 1977*

Jack Carey, Attorney for Claimant.

William J. Scott, Attorney General for Illinois; Vincent J. Biskupic, Assistant Attorney General, for Respondent.

Per Curiam.

*375This claim, arising out of the death of a fireman allegedly killed in the line of duty, seeks payment of compensation to the decedent’s beneficiaries pursuant to the provisions of the “Law Enforcement Officers and Firemen Compensation Act,” (hereafter, the Act), Ill. Rev. Stat., Ch. 48, Sec. 281 *et. seq.,*1975.

The Court has carefully considered the application for benefits submitted on the form prescribed and furnished by the Attorney General; a written statement of the decedent’s supervising officer; and a report by the Illinois Attorney General’s office which substantiates matters set forth in the application. Based upon these documents and other evidence submitted before the Court on May 11, 1977 and October 12, 1977, the Court finds that:

1. The Claimants, Earnestine Walker and Edward Mitchell, are the mother and father of the decedent, as stated in the application for benefits; and, in the absence of a designated beneficiary, Section 3(a) of the Act provides that any award hereunder shall be paid to the surviving parents, equally.

2. The decedent, Anthony Walker, age 19, was a volunteer fireman and member of the Alorton Volunteer Fire Department and engaged in the active performance of his duties, within the meaning of Section 2(e) of the Act, on November 28, 1976.

3. On said date, Lt. Walker and two other firemen were engaged in extinguishing a fire in a vacant building. As Walker was handling a water hose line near the building, the walls of the burning building collapsed, with bricks and debris striking Walker. He died, during surgery for his injuries the same day, and the Coroner’s certificate of death recited the immediate cause of death as “massive hemorrhage, due to or as a conse*376quence of severe laceration of liver, about two hours interval.”

4. Firefighter Walker was killed in the line of duty as defined in Section 2(e) of the Act.

5. The proof submitted in support of this claim satisfies all of the requirements of the Act, and the claim is therefore compensable thereunder.

It is hereby ordered that the sum of $10,000.00 be awarded to Earnestine Walker, as mother of Anthony Walker, and that the sum of $10,000.00 be awarded to Edward Mitchell, as father of Anthony Walker, the deceased fireman.
### §1652. Repealed. Pub. L. 117–328, div. H, title III, §313, Dec. 29, 2022, 136 Stat. 4898

Section, Pub. L. 92–318, title VIII, §802, June 23, 1972, 86 Stat. 371; Pub. L. 96–88, title III, §301, title V, §507, Oct. 17, 1979, 93 Stat. 677, 692, prohibited the use of appropriated funds for busing.
Editorial Note on Part 555
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 555 appear by T.D. ATF-487, 68 FR 3748, Jan. 24, 2003.

§ 555.182 Exceptions. It is an affirmative defense against any proceeding involving §§ 555.180 and 555.181 if the proponent proves by a preponderance of the evidence that the plastic explosive— ( a ) Consisted of a small amount of plastic explosive intended for and utilized solely in lawful— ( 1 ) Research, development, or testing of new or modified explosive materials;
( 2 ) Training in explosives detection or development or testing of explosives detection equipment; or
( 3 ) Forensic science purposes; or
( b ) Was plastic explosive that, by April 24, 1999, will be or is incorporated in a military device within the territory of the United States and remains an integral part of such military device, or is intended to be, or is incorporated in, and remains an integral part of a military device that is intended to become, or has become, the property of any agency of the United States performing military or police functions (including any military reserve component) or the National Guard of any State, wherever such device is located. For purposes of this paragraph, the term “military device” includes, but is not restricted to, shells, bombs, projectiles, mines, missiles, rockets, shaped charges, grenades, perforators, and similar devices lawfully manufactured exclusively for military or police purposes.
[T.D. ATF-387, 62 FR 8377, Feb. 25, 1997]
###### Editorial Note on Part 44

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 44 appear by T.D. ATF-464, 66 FR 43480, Aug. 20, 2001, and T.D. ATF-480, 67 FR 30801-30803, May 8, 2002.

#### § 44.202 To officers of the armed forces for subsequent exportation.

Where tobacco products, and cigarette papers and tubes are removed from a factory or an export warehouse for delivery to officers of the armed forces of the United States in this country for subsequent shipment to, and use by, the armed forces outside the United States, the manufacturer or export warehouse proprietor making the removal shall forward a copy of the notice of removal, Form 5200.14, to the officer at the base or installation authorized to receive the articles described on the notice of removal. Upon execution by the armed forces receiving officer of the certificate of receipt on the copy of the notice of removal, he shall return such copy to the manufacturer or export warehouse proprietor making the shipment for filing with the appropriate TTB officer.

(72 Stat. 1418, as amended; 26 U.S.C. 5704)

[T.D. 6871, 31 FR 53, Jan. 4, 1966. Redesignated at 40 FR 16835, Apr. 15, 1975, and amended by T.D. ATF-232, 51 FR 28089, Aug. 5, 1986; T.D. ATF-243, 51 FR 43194, Dec. 1, 1986; T.D. ATF-421, 64 FR 71926, Dec. 22, 1999]
#### George Herbert Smith, Appellant, v. New York Evening Journal Publishing Company, Respondent.

Order affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements. Ho opinion. Present — Ingraham, P. J., McLaughlin. Laughlin, Clarke and Scott, JJ.
In The Matter Of: 

SERVED: August 3, 2016 

U.S. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 

OFFICE OF HEARINGS 

WASHINGTON, DC 

Docket No. FAA-2015-0642 

RUGBY AVIATION 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

Case No. 2014NM010021 

Respondent 

ORDER DISMISSING PROCEEDING 

On November 19, 2015, an Order Setting Litigation Deadlines and Hearing Dates was 

filed. Among other things, this Order set an August 30,2016 Pre-Hearing Status Conference and 

the Hearing for November 2-3, 2016, in Seattle, Washington. 

On August 3, 2016, the parties filed a joint Notice of Settlement and Withdrawal of 

Appeal, stating that "the parties have reached a settlement" and "accordingly, the Respondent ... 

hereby withdraws their appeal herewith and Complainant withdraws their complaint." 

After having reviewed the case file, all pleadings and motions, all relevant case law, 

statutes, regulations, rules, and authority, and being fully advised; 

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED: 

1. The Pre-Hearing Status Conference set for August 30, 2016, is cancelled. 

2. The Hearing set for November 2-3, 2016, in Seattle, Washington is cancelled. 

3. Pursuant to 14 C.F.R. § 13.215, the parties have withdrawn their respective pleadings, 

and this proceeding is dismissed with prejudice. 

Attachment: Service List 
Docket No. FAA-2015-0642 

(Civil Penalty Action) 

SERVICE LIST - BY U.S. MAIL 

ORIGINAL & ONE COPY 

Federal Aviation Administration 

800 Independence Avenue, S.W. 

Washington, DC 20591 

Attention: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430 

Wilbur Wright Building-Suite 2Wl 0001 

Mr. David Shayne 

Complainant's Counsel 

Federal Aviation Administration 

Northwest Mountain Region (ANM-7) 

1601 Lind A venue Southwest 

Renton, W A 98057 

TEL: 425-227-2165 

FAX: 425-227-1007 

Mr. J.C. Becker 

Respondent's Counsel 

PO Box 13253 

Mill Creek, WA 98082-1253 

TEL: 425-280-2004 

Judge J .E. Sullivan 

U.S. Administrative Law Judge 

Office of Hearings, M-20 

U.S. Department of Transportation 

1200 New Jersey Avenue, S.E. (E11-310) 

Washington, DC 20590 

TEL: 202-366-6941 

FAX: 202-366-7536 

ONE COPY 

1 Service was by U.S. Mail. For service in person or by expedited courier, use the following address: Federal. 

Aviation Administration, 600 Independence Avenue, S.W., Wilbur Wright Building-Suite 2W1000, Washington, 

DC 20591; Attention: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430.
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Joseph Filippi, Appellant.

Judgment of the Court of Special Sessions of the City of New York, Borough of Brooklyn, convicting defendant of the crime of assault in the third degree, unanimously affirmed. No opinion. Present — Lewis, P. J., Carswell, Johnston, Adel and Wenzel, JJ.
###### Editorial Note on Part 40

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 40 appear by T.D. ATF-460, 66 FR 39094-39096, July 27, 2001; T.D. ATF-464, 66 FR 43479, Aug. 20, 2001; and T.D. TTB-91, 76 FR 5479, Feb. 1, 2011.

#### § 40.281 Abatement of assessment.

A claim for abatement of the unpaid portion of the assessment of any tax on tobacco products or any liability in respect thereof, may be allowed to the extent that such assessment is excessive in amount, is assessed after expiration of the applicable period of limitation, or is erroneously or illegally assessed. Any claim under this section shall be prepared on TTB F 5620.8, in duplicate, and shall set forth the particulars under which the claim is filed. The original of the claim, accompanied by such evidence as is necessary to establish to the satisfaction of the appropriate TTB officer that the claim is valid, shall be filed with the appropriate TTB officer, and the duplicate of the claim shall be retained by the manufacturer.

(68A Stat. 792; 26 U.S.C. 6404)

[T.D. 6871, 31 FR 38, Jan. 4, 1966. Redesignated at 40 FR 16835, Apr. 15, 1975, and amended by T.D. ATF-232, 51 FR 28083, Aug. 5, 1986; T.D. ATF-243, 51 FR 43194, Dec. 1, 1986; T.D. ATF-251, 52 FR 19340, May 22, 1987]
[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 11 (Tuesday, January 18, 2011)]
[Notices]
[Page 2914]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2011-877]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


National Institute of General Medical Sciences; Notice of Closed 
Meeting

    Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended (5 U.S.C. App.), notice is hereby given of the following 
meeting.
    The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the 
provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 
U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could 
disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as 
patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals 
associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would 
constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

    Name of Committee: National Institute of General Medical 
Sciences Special Emphasis Panel; PSI Materials Repository Review.
    Date: February 11, 2011.
    Time: 2 p.m. to 4 p.m.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate grant applications.
    Place: National Institutes of Health, Natcher Building, 45 
Center Drive, Room 3AN18, Bethesda, MD 20892. (Telephone Conference 
Call.)
    Contact Person: Brian R. Pike, PhD, Scientific Review Officer, 
Office of Scientific Review, National Institute of General Medical 
Sciences, National Institutes of Health, Natcher Building, Room 
3AN18K, Bethesda, MD 20892, 301-594-3907, <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#ed9d84868f9fad83848a809ec3838485c38a829b"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="ddadb4b6bfaf9db3b4bab0aef3b3b4b5f3bab2ab">[email protected]</span></a>.

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.375, 
Minority Biomedical Research Support; 93.821, Cell Biology and 
Biophysics Research; 93.859, Pharmacology, Physiology, and 
Biological Chemistry Research; 93.862, Genetics and Developmental 
Biology Research; 93.88, Minority Access to Research Careers; 93.96, 
Special Minority Initiatives, National Institutes of Health, HHS)

    Dated: January 11, 2011.
Jennifer Spaeth,
Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. 2011-877 Filed 1-14-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
I 

116TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 5734 

To repeal the Alien Enemies Act, and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JANUARY 30, 2020 

Ms. OMAR introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee 

on the Judiciary 

A BILL 

To repeal the Alien Enemies Act, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Neighbors Not En5 emies Act’’. 

6 SEC. 2. REPEAL OF ALIEN ENEMIES ACT. 

7 Sections 4067 through 4070 of the Revised Statutes 

8 of the United States (50 U.S.C. 21–24) are repealed. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
Exhibit 23.3
 CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY HIGH

 1,386

 1,334

 1,297

 1,291

 1,200

 1,227

 1,220

 1,233

 1,238

 1,276

 1,300

 1,292

 1,355

 1,338

 1,301

 1,284

 1,240

 1,233

 1,153

 1,224

 1,243

 1,321

 1,304

 1,374

 1,540

 1,518

 1,655

 1,577

 1,567

 1,398

 1,305

 944

 956

 964

 975

 999

 976

 990

 1,013

 1,000

 971

 991

 997

 978

 1,010

 1,015

 1,012

 1,027

 1,032

 1,026

 1,025

 1,049

 1,057

 1,030

 1,039

 1,072

 1,066

 1,078

 1,138

 1,104

 1,040

 1,004

 1,110

 1,094

 1,093

 1,116

 1,076

 1,063

 1,066

 1,090

 1,090

 1,114

 1,126

 1,133

 1,131

 1,139

 1,126

 1,130

 1,123

 1,123

 1,070

 1,093

 1,112

 1,151

 1,137

 1,161

 1,261

 1,255

 1,402

 1,351

 1,279

 1,170

 1,119

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

JANUARY 2021 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: February 2, 2021

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

FARRAR PARK AT DUTCH SLOUGH
§ 24.21 Modified forms. ( a ) *General.* The appropriate TTB officer may approve the use of a modified form in lieu of the prescribed form required by this part, when in the judgment of the appropriate TTB officer: ( 1 ) Good cause has been shown for the use of the modified form and
( 2 ) The use of the modified form will not result in a net increase in cost to the Government or hinder the effective administration of this part. Except to adapt tax returns for use with data processing equipment, no proposal for modification of a prescribed form relating to qualification, to the giving of any bond, or to the assessment, payment, or collection of tax will be approved under this section.
( b ) *Application.* The proprietor who desires to modify a prescribed form shall submit a written application to the appropriate TTB officer. The application will state the reasons a modified form is necessary and be accompanied by a copy of the proposed form with typical entries.
( c ) *Conditions.* A modified form may not be used until the application has been approved by the appropriate TTB officer. Authorization for the use of a modified form is conditioned on compliance with the procedures, conditions, and limitations specified in the approval of the application. The use of a modified form does not relieve the proprietor from any requirement of this part. Authority for use of a modified form may be withdrawn whenever in the judgment of the appropriate TTB officer the effective administration of this part is hindered by the continuation of the authority.
(Sec. 201, Pub. L. 85-859, 72 Stat. 1381, as amended, 1395, as amended (26 U.S.C. 5367, 5555))
(Approved by the Office of Management and Budget under control number 1512-0292) [T.D. ATF-299, 55 FR 24989, June 19, 1990, as amended by T.D. ATF-409, 64 FR 13683, Mar. 22, 1999]