alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF TEXAS

-- -- -- --

denied

NO. 14-0946

TRANSCONTINENTAL REALTY

INVESTORS, INC.

v.

SIDNEY WICKS, AS TRUSTEE OF

THE SIDNEY WICKS REVOCABLE

TRUST

§

§

§

§

§

§

Dallas County,

5th District.

February 6, 2015

Petitioner's petition for review, filed herein in the above numbered and styled case,

having been duly considered, is ordered, and hereby is, denied.

March 30, 2015

Petitioner's motion for rehearing of petition for review, filed herein in the above

numbered and styled case, having been duly considered, is ordered, and hereby is, denied.



I, BLAKE A. HAWTHORNE, Clerk of the Supreme Court of Texas, do hereby certify

that the above and attached is a true and correct copy of the orders of the Supreme Court of

Texas in the case numbered and styled as above, as the same appear of record in the minutes of

said Court under the date shown.

It is further ordered that petitioner, TRANSCONTINENTAL REALTY INVESTORS,

INC., pay all costs incurred on this petition.

WITNESS my hand and seal of the Supreme Court of Texas, at the City of Austin, this

the 27th day of March, 2015.

Blake A. Hawthorne, Clerk

By Monica Zamarripa, Deputy Clerk

FILE COPY
Exhibit 23.1
 CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
  /s/ PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP

PricewaterhouseCoopers LLPPhoenix, ArizonaJune 17, 2011
Exhibit 31.1
CERTIFICATIONS
I, Charles J. Dolezal, certify that:
 1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K for the yearended December 31, 2003 of National Bancshares Corporation;  2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain anyuntrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material factnecessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstancesunder which such statements were made, not misleading with respectto the period covered by this report;  3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and otherfinancial information included in this report, fairly present in allmaterial respects the financial condition, results of operations andcash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presentedin this report;  4. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I areresponsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls andprocedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:
 a. Designed such disclosure controls and procedures,or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to bedesigned under our supervision, to ensure that materialinformation relating to the registrant, including itsconsolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by otherswithin those entities, particularly during the period in whichthis report is being prepared;  b. Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’sdisclosure controls and procedures and presented in thisreport our conclusions about the effectiveness of thedisclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of theperiod covered by this report based on such evaluation; and  c. Disclosed in this report any change in theregistrant’s internal control over financial reporting thatoccurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter(the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of anannual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonablylikely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal controlover financial reporting; and
 5. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I havedisclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal controlover financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the auditcommittee of the registrant’s board of directors (or personsperforming the equivalent functions):
 a. All significant deficiencies and materialweaknesses in the design or operation of internal control overfinancial reporting which are reasonably likely to adverselyaffect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarizeand report financial information; and  b. Any fraud, whether or not material, that involvesmanagement or other employees who have a significant role inthe registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.
Date: March 26, 2004     /s/ Charles J. Dolezal   Charles J. Dolezal, President and Chief Executive Officer
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

DAY HIGH

 279

 329

 399

 862

 1,444

 2,165

 2,108

 1,355

 987

 981

 857

 997

 984

 1,106

 1,289

 1,525

 2,096

 1,818

 1,676

 1,314

 1,131

 1,000

 811

 626

 624

 656

 682

 772

 1,062

 1,139

 225

 226

 231

 286

 442

 613

 612

 527

 483

 468

 455

 449

 442

 463

 481

 522

 560

 554

 485

 507

 477

 466

 443

 413

 395

 380

 363

 364

 374

 338

 236

 249

 275

 449

 734

 1,026

 1,076

 830

 678

 620

 574

 573

 592

 624

 691

 853

 1,100

 958

 869

 764

 682

 633

 570

 502

 463

 452

 441

 482

 586

 605

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

JUNE 2004 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: July 6, 2004

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

14 DAY

ACCUM

MEAN

14 DAY

AVG

MEAN

 3,135

 3,167

 3,226

 3,455

 3,966

 4,772

 5,630

 6,238

 6,688

 7,083

 7,430

 7,777

 8,142

 8,536

 8,991

 9,595

 10,420

 10,929

 11,064

 10,802

 10,408

 10,211

 10,103

 9,985

 9,874

 9,753

 9,602

 9,460

 9,355

 9,107

 224

 226

 230

 247

 283

 341

 402

 446

 478

 506

 531

 556

 582

 610

 642

 685

 744

 781

 790

 772

 743

 729

 722

 713

 705

 697

 686

 676

 668

 651

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

JERSEY POINT TOP ON THE SAN JOAQUIN RIVER
#### § 24.86 Essences produced on wine premises.

Wine, taxpaid spirits, or spirits withdrawn tax-free may be used in the production of essences on wine premises. The description of the process for producing the essence may be included as part of a formula for the production of a formula wine or a separate formula may be filed on TTB F5120.29. If a separate formula is filed for the essence, the serial number of the formula by which it is produced will be shown in the TTB F 5120.29 covering the formula wine in which it is to be used. If an essence is to be made in quantities greater than required for individual lots of formula wine, and stored on the premises, a separate formula will be filed for the essence. Essences made on wine premises with wine spirits withdrawn free of tax pursuant to 26 U.S.C. 5214(a)(5) may only be used in the production of a formula wine, and may not be removed from the premises where made. Essences made on wine premises with the use of tax-free spirits withdrawn free of tax pursuant to 26 U.S.C. 5214(a)(13) may only be used in the production of a nonbeverage wine or wine product and may not be removed from the premises where made. The TTB F 5120.29 for the production of an essence is filed in the same manner as for the production of formula wine and a sample of the essence produced will be at least four fluid ounces.

(Sec. 201, Pub. L. 85-859, 72 Stat. 1386, as amended (26 U.S.C. 5386))

(Approved by the Office of Management and Budget under control number 1512-0059)
#### Paul G. Tismer, Respondent, v. The New York Edison Company, Appellant.

Order modified by striking out items Hos. 1 and 3 of the particulars required to be furnished, and as modified affirmed, without costs to either party. Ho opinion. Order to be settled on notice. Present — Ingraham, P. J., McLaughlin, Laughlin, Clarke and Scott, JJ.
### §1161r. Campus-based digital theft prevention

#### (a) Program authority

From the amounts appropriated under subsection (d), the Secretary may make grants to institutions of higher education, or consortia of such institutions, and enter into contracts with such institutions, consortia, and other organizations, to develop, implement, operate, improve, and disseminate programs of prevention, education, and cost-effective technological solutions, to reduce and eliminate the illegal downloading and distribution of intellectual property. Such grants or contracts may also be used for the support of higher education centers that will provide training, technical assistance, evaluation, dissemination, and associated services and assistance to the higher education community as determined by the Secretary and institutions of higher education.

#### (b) Awards

Grants and contracts shall be awarded under this section on a competitive basis.

#### (c) Applications

An institution of higher education or a consortium of such institutions that desires to receive a grant or contract under this section shall submit an application to the Secretary at such time, in such manner, and containing or accompanied by such information as the Secretary may reasonably require by regulation.

#### (d) Authorization of appropriations

There are authorized to be appropriated to carry out this section such sums as may be necessary for fiscal year 2009 and each of the five succeeding fiscal years.

(Pub. L. 89–329, title VIII, §871, as added Pub. L. 110–315, title VIII, §801, Aug. 14, 2008, 122 Stat. 3425.)
Filed 6/30/14 P. v. Aguirre CA6

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN OFFICIAL REPORTS

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication

or or dered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

SIXTH APPELLATE DISTRICT

THE PEOPLE,

Plaintiff and Respondent,

v.

JOSE CARMEN ALAVARADO

AGUIRRE,

Defendant and Appellant. H040145

(Monterey County

Super. Ct. No. SS131535)

Defendan t Jose Carmen Alavarado Aguirre’s suppression motion was denied, and

he pleaded guilty to possession of a controlled substance (Health & Saf. Code, § 11350)

on the condition that he be granted deferred entry of judgment. The court accepted his

plea and granted him deferred entry of judgment. Defendant then filed a notice of appeal

from the denial of his suppression motion. His appointed counsel filed an opening brief

that purported to be aut horized under People v. Wende (1979) 25 Cal.3d 436 , but he

admitted that deferred entry of judgment “is not appealable.”

Since there was no appealable order or judgment, we are compelled to dismiss the

appeal. In People v. Mazurette (2001) 24 Cal. 4th 78 9 ( Mazurette )

, the defendant’s

suppression motion was denied, he pleaded no contest, and the court granted deferred

entry of judgment. The defendant then appealed, and his appellate counsel filed a Wende

brief. ( Mazurette , at pp. 791

- 792.) The Court of Appeal dismissed the appeal, and the2

California Supreme Court upheld that decision on the ground that there was no

appealable order or judgm ent. ( Mazurette , at pp. 793

- 796 .)

The purported appeal is dismissed.

_______________________________ Mihara, J.

WE CONCUR:

_____________________________ Premo

, Acting P. J.

_____________________________ Elia , J.
### §1470. Purposes

The purposes of this part are to ensure that—

(1) children with disabilities and their parents receive training and information designed to assist the children in meeting developmental and functional goals and challenging academic achievement goals, and in preparing to lead productive independent adult lives;

(2) children with disabilities and their parents receive training and information on their rights, responsibilities, and protections under this chapter, in order to develop the skills necessary to cooperatively and effectively participate in planning and decision making relating to early intervention, educational, and transitional services;

(3) parents, teachers, administrators, early intervention personnel, related services personnel, and transition personnel receive coordinated and accessible technical assistance and information to assist such personnel in improving early intervention, educational, and transitional services and results for children with disabilities and their families; and

(4) appropriate technology and media are researched, developed, and demonstrated, to improve and implement early intervention, educational, and transitional services and results for children with disabilities and their families.

(Pub. L. 91–230, title VI, §670, as added Pub. L. 108–446, title I, §101, Dec. 3, 2004, 118 Stat. 2788.)
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY ELEV

 540.49

 540.07

 539.52

 539.29

 539.04

 538.68

 538.48

 538.20

 537.77

 537.33

 536.86

 536.58

 535.86

 535.86

 535.67

 535.10

 533.80

 532.14

 530.64

 529.11

 527.59

 526.52

 525.48

 524.35

 523.32

 522.42

 521.62

 520.93

 520.44

 520.24

 520.05

 354.9

 353.2

 351.1

 350.2

 349.2

 347.8

 347.0

 345.9

 344.3

 342.6

 340.7

 339.7

 336.9

 336.9

 336.2

 334.0

 329.1

 322.9

 317.3

 311.7

 306.1

 302.3

 298.5

 294.5

 290.9

 287.7

 285.0

 282.6

 280.9

 280.2

 279.5

STORAGE

-1.2

-1.7

-2.2

-0.9

-1.0

-1.4

-0.8

-1.1

-1.7

-1.7

-1.8

-1.1

-2.8

+0.0

-0.7

-2.2

-4.9

-6.2

-5.6

-5.6

-5.5

-3.9

-3.7

-4.0

-3.6

-3.2

-2.8

-2.4

-1.7

-0.7

-0.7

CHANGE

2,416

2,316

2,094

2,522

2,282

1,724

1,712

1,507

1,343

1,421

1,726

2,236

1,273

2,617

2,151

1,674

714

379

757

618

134

525

527

446

634

489

560

653

897

1,485

1,474

INFLOW

 534

 521

 454

 377

 308

 279

 295

 317

 296

 275

 338

 394

 407

 454

 441

 458

 478

 472

 448

 415

 419

 361

 329

 409

 465

 120

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

MADERA

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

SPILL

 2,104

 2,250

 2,352

 2,214

 2,106

 1,795

 1,446

 1,372

 1,509

 1,630

 1,743

 1,656

 1,541

 1,440

 1,357

 1,588

 2,013

 2,312

 2,400

 2,316

 1,997

 1,742

 1,702

 1,699

 1,635

 1,595

 1,603

 1,491

 1,378

 1,465

 1,448

FRIANT-KERN

 25

 27

 23

 34

 10

 6

 14

 18

 29

 24

 5

 27

 17

 23

 19

 25

 6

 37

 11

 21

 14

 20

 25

 16

 18

 15

 15

 21

 21

 19

 6

C.F.S.

 .20

 .21

 .18

 .27

 .08

 .05

 .11

 .14

 .23

 .19

 .04

 .22

 .14

 .19

 .15

 .20

 .05

 .31

 .09

 .18

 .12

 .17

 .22

 .14

 .16

 .13

 .13

 .19

 .19

 .17

 .05

INCHES

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .88

 .36

 .02

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

PRECIP

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

OCTOBER 2011 MILLERTON LAKE DAILY OPERATIONS RUN DATE: November 1, 2011

IN LAKE

EVAPORATION

INCHES

C.F.S.

COMPUTED*

1000 ACRE-FEET

RELEASE - C.F.S. 

TOTALS -76.5 41,306 10,064 54,899 0 591 4.90 1.26

ACRE-FEET -76,524 81,930 19,962 108,892 0 1,172

COMMENTS:

* COMPUTED INFLOW IS THE SUM OF CHANGE IN STORAGE, RELEASES, PUMPING AND EVAPORATION.

SUMMARY

RELEASE (ACRE-FEET)

CANALS

FRIANT-KERN

MADERA

 108,892

 19,962 157,284

PRECIPITATION

THIS MONTH =

JULY 1, 2011 TO DATE = 1.31

 356.1

 28,430 1.26

CANALS

AT FRIANT

TOTAL RELEASES

OUTLET

 347

 350

 352

 352

 352

 351

 350

 350

 350

 350

 555

 701

 700

 700

 700

 699

 698

 695

 700

 703

 497

 350

 349

 348

 348

 348

 346

 346

 348

 348

 350

RIVER

 14,333

 28,430

RIVER
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY HIGH

 420

 410

 403

 402

 402

 408

 414

 424

 441

 465

 598

 744

 821

 835

 807

 820

 797

 776

 776

 767

 759

 741

 749

 765

 767

 772

 813

 832

 839

 850

 871

 330

 344

 337

 341

 341

 345

 340

 356

 371

 380

 398

 411

 448

 488

 496

 510

 525

 553

 573

 578

 571

 583

 554

 583

 586

 574

 623

 605

 627

 633

 635

 386

 385

 382

 380

 377

 380

 381

 387

 399

 411

 453

 514

 603

 663

 659

 659

 664

 663

 673

 676

 663

 656

 659

 664

 667

 683

 706

 702

 706

 717

 736

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

JULY 2008 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: August 1, 2008

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

FARRAR PARK AT DUTCH SLOUGH
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5

<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
REGISTRANT'S FORM 10-K FOR THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1995 AND IS
QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
INCLUDED IN SUCH REPORT.
</LEGEND>

       
<S>                    <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>          12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>      DEC-31-1995
<PERIOD-END>           DEC-31-1995

<CASH>                         5,205,597 
<SECURITIES>                        0    
<RECEIVABLES>                    115,957 
<ALLOWANCES>                        0    
<INVENTORY>                         0    
<CURRENT-ASSETS>               5,321,554 
<PP&E>                              0    
<DEPRECIATION>                      0    
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                36,850,082 
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>            452,341 
<BONDS>                             0    
<COMMON>                            0    
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>               0    
<PREFERRED>                         0    
<OTHER-SE>                    36,397,741 
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>  36,850,082 
<SALES>                        2,626,166 
<TOTAL-REVENUES>               2,626,166 
<CGS>                               0    
<TOTAL-COSTS>                     91,416 
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                 467,294 
<LOSS-PROVISION>                    0    
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                  0    
<INCOME-PRETAX>                2,067,456 
<INCOME-TAX>                        0    
<INCOME-CONTINUING>            1,923,264 
<DISCONTINUED>                      0    
<EXTRAORDINARY>                     0    
<CHANGES>                           0    
<NET-INCOME>                   1,923,264 
<EPS-PRIMARY>                      37.05 
<EPS-DILUTED>                      37.05 

        



</TABLE>
7/23/2015 common-Recording and Playing Back Missions | Mission Planner

http://planner.ardupilot.com/wiki/common-recording-and-playing-back-missions/ 1/3

If you are using wireless telemetry and have connected to APM via the Mission Planner, your

flight data will automatically recorded as a “tlog” file in the Mission Planner’s logs folder.

You can load and replay any one and convert any log to a KMZ file that can be displayed in

Google Earth by clicking on the KMZ button. That file can also be found in the logs folder.

While the log is replaying, you can analyze the data by clicking on the “Tuning” checkbox under

the map display in the Flight Data tab. It will show the recorded data changing as the flight

progresses. You can double click on the data legend to bring up a box that will let you choose

which data fields are graphed, as shown here:

ArduPilot > Mission Planner > common-Recording and Playing Back Missions

Recording and Playing Back Missions

Mission Planner

English
7/23/2015 common-Recording and Playing Back Missions | Mission Planner

http://planner.ardupilot.com/wiki/common-recording-and-playing-back-missions/ 2/3

Below is a video overview of how to use tlogs.

Questions about this page? Comments? Suggestions? Post to APM Forum! Use the platform

specific to your query, and make sure to include the name of the page you are referring to.
7/23/2015 common-Recording and Playing Back Missions | Mission Planner

http://planner.ardupilot.com/wiki/common-recording-and-playing-back-missions/ 3/3
#### Susan A. Phelps, Appellant, v. John Walter Phelps, Respondent.

Order reversed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and motion that supplemental summons issue and supplemental pleadings be made granted, with ten dollars costs. No opinion. Jenks, P. J., Burr, Thomas, Carr and Rich, JJ., concurred.
(No. 74-CC-645

#### Capital Chrysler Plymouth, Inc., Claimant, *vs.*State of Illinois, Office of the Comptroller, Respondent.

*Opinion filed May 15, 1974.*

Capital Chrysler Plymouth, Inc., Claimant, pro se.

William J. Scott, Attorney General; Howard W. Feldman, Assistant Attorney General, for Respondent.

Per Curiam.
<PAGE>   1


                                                                     EXHIBIT 2.5

                             DIVESTITURE AGREEMENT


DATE:         January 2, 1995

PARTIES:      1.  MRR Construction Services, Inc. ("MRR")
                  P.O. Box 1423
                  Chino, CA 91708

              2.  Roaul L. Wheeler ("Wheeler")
                  P.O. Box 1423
                  Chino, CA 91708

              3.  PAN Environmental Corporation ("PAN")
                  14424 SE 78th Way
                  Renton, WA 98059

SUBJECT:      Divestiture -- Resale of Subsidiary Company MRR by Parent Company
              PAN to Wheeler

RECITALS:     

       WHEREAS, on March 4, 1993 PAN acquired 3,000 shares, or one hundred
percent, of the issued and outstanding stock of MRR, and

       WHEREAS, PAN wishes to divest itself of MRR as a subsidiary by
reconveying the 3,000 shares of MRR stock back to Wheeler, and

       WHEREAS, PAN desires to be forgiven from its obligation to repay a
$50,000 advance owed by PAN to MRR, and

       WHEREAS, PAN will allow Wheeler to keep the 112,889 shares of PAN held
by Wheeler from the original acquisition of MRR by PAN,

       NOW, THEREFORE, for the mutual considerations contained herein, the
parties agree as follows:

1.     PAN agrees to reconvey the 3,000 shares of MRR back to Wheeler.





       
<PAGE>   2
2.   MRR agrees to forgive the repayment of the $50,000 advance from MRR to PAN.

3.   PAN agrees to allow Wheeler to keep his 112,889 shares of PAN.


EXECUTED this 2nd day of January, 1995.


MRR CONSTRUCTION SERVICES, INC.           ROAUL L. WHEELER


By /s/ ROAUL L. WHEELER                   President
   ----------------------------------   ---------------------------------------
   Roaul L. Wheeler, President



PAN ENVIRONMENTAL CORPORATION


By /s/ JERRY CORNWELL
   ----------------------------------
   Jerry Cornwell, President
#### Samuel Jackson and Others, Respondents, v. New York Contracting Company—Pennsylvania Terminal, and Another, Appellants.

Judgment and orders affirmed, with costs. No opinion. Present—Ingraham, P. J., Laughlin, Clarke, Scott and Hotchkiss, JJ.
#### Edward S. Silver, as Trustee in Bankruptcy of Philip Prever, Respondent, v. Philip Prever et al., Appellants, et al., Defendants.

No opinion. Present — Martin, P. J., Townley, Untermyer, Dore and Cohn, JJ.