alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 96-6409

ROBERT J. ELLIS,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

SECRETARY OF PUBLIC SAFETY,

Defendant - Appellee.

No. 96-6463

TERRY LEE BOBLETT,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

SECRETARY OF PUBLIC SAFETY,

Defendant - Appellee.
2

No. 96-6464

CORNELIUS STRONG,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

PARRIS GLENDENING, Governor; MARVIN N. ROBBINS, Director, Inmate Grievance Commission;

WILLIAM SMITH, Warden of the Maryland House of

Correction,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeals from the United States District Court for the District of

Maryland, at Baltimore. J. Frederick Motz, Chief District Judge.

(CA-96-268-JFM, CA-96-490-JFM, CA-95-3369-JFM)

Submitted: August 22, 1996 Decided: September 3, 1996

Before HALL, MICHAEL, and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Robert J. Ellis, Terry Lee Boblett, Cornelius Strong, Appellants

Pro Se. John Joseph Curran, Attorney General, Richard Bruce

Rosenblatt, Assistant Attorney General, Baltimore, Maryland, for

Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
3

PER CURIAM:

Appellants appeal from the district court's orders denying relief on their 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1988) complaints. We have reviewed

the record and the district court's opinions and find no reversible

error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district

court. Ellis v. Secretary of Public Safety, No. CA-96-268-JFM (D.

Md. Feb. 29, 1996); Boblett v. Secretary of Public Safety, No. CA96-490-JFM (D. Md. Mar. 1, 1996); Strong v. Glendening, No. CA-95-

3369-JFM (D. Md. Feb. 29, 1996). We dispense with oral argument

because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in

the materials before the court and argument would not aid the

decisional process.

AFFIRMED
### §1087i–2. Temporary loan consolidation authority

#### (a) Temporary loan consolidation authority

#### (1) In general

A borrower who has 1 or more loans in 2 or more of the categories described in paragraph (2), and who has not yet entered repayment on 1 or more of those loans in any of the categories, may consolidate all of the loans of the borrower that are described in paragraph (2) into a Federal Direct Consolidation Loan during the period described in paragraph (3).

#### (2) Categories of loans that may be consolidated

The categories of loans that may be consolidated under paragraph (1) are—

(A) loans made under this part;

(B) loans purchased by the Secretary pursuant to section 1087i–1 of this title; and

(C) loans made under part B that are held by an eligible lender, as such term is defined in section 1085(d) of this title.

#### (3) Time period in which loans may be consolidated

The Secretary may make a Federal Direct Consolidation Loan under this section to a borrower whose application for such Federal Direct Consolidation Loan is received on or after July 1, 2010, and before July 1, 2011.

#### (b) Terms of loans

A Federal Direct Consolidation Loan made under this section shall have the same terms and conditions as a Federal Direct Consolidation Loan made under section 1087e(g) of this title, except that—

(1) in determining the applicable rate of interest on the Federal Direct Consolidation Loan made under this section (other than on a Federal Direct Consolidation Loan described in paragraph (2)), section 1077a(l)(3) of this title shall be applied without rounding the weighted average of the interest rate on the loans consolidated to the nearest higher one-eighth of 1 percent as described in subparagraph (A) of section 1077a(l)(3) of this title; and

(2) if a Federal Direct Consolidation Loan made under this section that repays a loan which is subject to an interest rate determined under section 1077a(g)(2), (j)(2), or (k)(2) of this title, then the interest rate for such Federal Direct Consolidation Loan shall be calculated—

(A) by using the applicable rate of interest described in section 1077a(g)(2), (j)(2), or (k)(2) of this title, respectively; and

(B) in accordance with section 1077a(l)(3) of this title.

(Pub. L. 89–329, title IV, §459B, as added Pub. L. 111–152, title II, §2206(b), Mar. 30, 2010, 124 Stat. 1075.)
----

----

**EXHIBIT      32**

**CERTIFICATION      OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER**

**PURSUANT      TO 18 U.S.C. ss.1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF      THE**

**SARBANES-OXLEY      ACT OF 2002**

|                                                   | */s/                James S. Marlen*                         |
|--------------------------------------------------------|--------------------------------------------------------------|
|                                                   | James                S. Marlen                               |
| President                & Chief Executive Officer |
| February 8,                2007                   |
|                                                   |                                                         |
|                                                   |                                                         |
|                                                   | */s/                James R. McLaughlin*                     |
|                                                   | James                R. McLaughlin                           |
|                                                   | Senior                Vice President-Chief Financial Officer |
|                                                   | &                Treasurer                               |
|                                                   | February 8,                2007                         |
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### National Institutes of Health 

Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as amended (5 U.S.C. App.), notice is hereby given of the following meeting. 

The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

*Name of Committee:*                         National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute Special Emphasis Panel; Career Enhancement Award for Stem Cell Research.                     

*Date:*                         May 4, 2011.                     

*Time:*                         12:30 p.m. to 3 p.m.                     

*Agenda:*                         To review and evaluate grant applications.                     

*Place:*                         National Institutes of Health, 6701 Rockledge Drive, Bethesda, MD 20892, (Telephone Conference Call)                     

*Contact Person:*                         William J. Johnson, PhD, Scientific Review Officer, Office of Scientific Review/DERA, National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute, 6701 Rockledge Drive, Room 7178, Bethesda, MD 20892-7924, 301-435-0725,                         *johnsonwj@nhlbi.nih.gov.*

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.233, National Center for Sleep Disorders Research; 93.837, Heart and Vascular Diseases Research; 93.838, Lung Diseases Research; 93.839, Blood Diseases and Resources Research, National Institutes of Health, HHS)

Dated: April 5, 2011. 

Jennifer S. Spaeth, 

Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.

[FR Doc. 2011-8610 Filed 4-11-11; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4140-01-P
#### CAI HONG CHEN, Petitioner, v. UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Alberto R. Gonzales, Attorney General, Respondents.

No. 05-6510-ag.

United States Court of Appeals, Second Circuit.

July 27, 2006.

*87David X. Feng, New York, New York, for Petitioner.

Paul I. Perez, United States Attorney General, Karin B. Hoppmann, Roberta J. Bodnar, Assistant United States Attorneys, Orlando, Florida, for Respondents.

PRESENT: Hon. GUIDO CALABRESI, Hon. SONIA SOTOMAYOR, Hon. RICHARD C. WESLEY, Circuit Judges.

SUMMARY ORDER

Cai Hong Chen ([ A XX XXX XXX ]), a citizen of China, petitions for review of the BIA’s affirmance of Immigration Judge (“IJ”) Brigitte Laforest’s denial of her claims for asylum, withholding of removal and relief under the Convention Against Torture (“CAT”). We assume the parties’ familiarity with the underlying facts and procedural history of the case.

When the BIA adopts the decision of the IJ and supplements the IJ’s decision, this Court reviews the decision of the IJ as supplemented by the BIA. *See Yu Yin Yang v. Gonzales,*431 F.3d 84, 85 (2d Cir.2005); *Yan Chen v. Gonzales,*417 F.3d 268, 271 (2d Cir.2005). This Court reviews the agency’s factual findings, including adverse credibility determinations, under the substantial evidence standard. 8 U.S.C. § 1252(b)(4)(B).

In this case, the BIA and IJ found Chen’s testimony incredible because, among other things, they did not find credible her explanation for the following inconsistencies between her testimony, her asylum application, and the documentary evidence in the record: (1) Chen gave three different explanations as to how she learned of the arrest of her Mend, an alleged Falun Gong co-practitioner; (2) Chen testified that the police came to her home from “time to time” to arrest her, yet her father’s letter mentions that the police came to their home on only one occasion to arrest Chen; and (3) Chen claimed that she left China on her own passport, yet only when she was asked how this was possible did she mention that her father’s Mend was in the airport security bureau and helped her leave, an assertion that is not reflected in her father’s otherwise detailed letter describing how Chen left China. These discrepancies provide substantial evidence to support the agency’s adverse credibility finding irrespective of the alternate burden of proof analysis by the BIA.

Chen has not meaningftdly challenged the IJ’s denial of her withholding of removal and CAT claims in her brief to this Court. Issues not sufficiently argued in the briefs are considered waived and normally will not be addressed on appeal. *See Yueqing Zhang v. Gonzales,*426 F.3d 540, 541 n. 1, 546 n. 7 (2d Cir.2005).

For the foregoing reasons, the petition for review is DENIED. Having completed our review, any stay of removal that the Court previously granted in this petition is *88VACATED, and the pending motion for a stay of removal in this petition is DENIED as moot. Any pending request for oral argument in this petition is DENIED in accordance with Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure 34(a)(2), and Second Circuit Local Rule 34(d)(1).
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

DAY ELEV

 576.28

 576.24

 576.22

 576.15

 576.01

 575.70

 575.37

 575.14

 574.93

 574.56

 573.98

 573.42

 572.95

 572.69

 572.45

 572.04

 571.76

 571.38

 571.22

 570.66

 569.91

 569.33

 569.06

 568.72

 568.29

 567.71

 566.94

 566.15

 565.28

 564.39

 512.1

 511.9

 511.8

 511.5

 510.8

 509.3

 507.7

 506.6

 505.6

 503.8

 501.0

 498.3

 496.1

 494.9

 493.7

 491.8

 490.4

 488.6

 487.9

 485.3

 481.7

 479.0

 477.7

 476.2

 474.2

 471.5

 467.9

 464.2

 460.3

 456.2

STORAGE

-0.2

-0.2

-0.1

-0.3

-0.7

-1.5

-1.6

-1.1

-1.0

-1.8

-2.8

-2.7

-2.2

-1.2

-1.1

-2.0

-1.3

-1.8

-0.8

-2.6

-3.5

-2.7

-1.3

-1.6

-2.0

-2.7

-3.6

-3.6

-4.0

-4.1

CHANGE

3,491

3,660

3,857

3,769

3,852

3,771

3,778

3,749

3,768

3,381

2,901

3,081

3,127

3,167

2,776

2,294

2,710

2,549

3,173

2,267

1,683

1,737

2,343

2,320

2,312

2,193

1,969

2,181

1,961

1,933

INFLOW

 396

 396

 411

 445

 511

 580

 742

 747

 646

 677

 678

 678

 761

 841

 856

 840

 857

 872

 864

 855

 871

 864

 807

 811

 826

 865

 904

 915

 870

 870

MADERA

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

SPILL

 2,943

 3,135

 3,301

 3,272

 3,453

 3,715

 3,581

 3,319

 3,368

 3,392

 3,410

 3,508

 3,262

 2,670

 2,240

 2,182

 2,264

 2,328

 2,430

 2,475

 2,319

 1,984

 1,940

 2,061

 2,240

 2,409

 2,607

 2,846

 2,843

 2,855

FRIANT-KERN

 101

 53

 20

 50

 57

 58

 86

 70

 92

 36

 47

 73

 48

 79

 55

 55

 57

 54

 61

 67

 71

 64

 38

 51

 60

 79

 55

 55

 58

 53

C.F.S.

 .64

 .34

 .13

 .32

 .36

 .37

 .55

 .45

 .59

 .23

 .30

 .47

 .31

 .51

 .36

 .36

 .37

 .35

 .40

 .44

 .47

 .42

 .25

 .34

 .40

 .53

 .37

 .37

 .39

 .36

INCHES

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

PRECIP

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

JUNE 2002 MILLERTON LAKE DAILY OPERATIONS RUN DATE: July 12, 2002

IN LAKE

EVAPORATION

INCHES

C.F.S.

COMPUTED*

1000 ACRE-FEET

RELEASE - C.F.S. 

TOTALS -56.2 85,753 22,256 84,352 0 1,803 11.75 .00

ACRE-FEET -56,176 170,091 44,145 167,312 0 3,576

COMMENTS:

* COMPUTED INFLOW IS THE SUM OF CHANGE IN STORAGE, RELEASES, PUMPING AND EVAPORATION.

SUMMARY

RELEASE (ACRE-FEET)

CANALS

FRIANT-KERN

MADERA

 167,312

 44,145 222,692

PRECIPITATION

THIS MONTH =

JULY 1, 2001 TO DATE = 11.28

 512.4

 11,235 0.00

CANALS

AT FRIANT

TOTAL RELEASES

OUTLET

 174

 174

 174

 174

 174

 174

 174

 174

 173

 173

 173

 173

 189

 200

 200

 200

 200

 200

 200

 200

 199

 197

 197

 197

 197

 199

 202

 201

 201

 201

RIVER

 5,664

 11,235

RIVER

Table 15
### subpart 1—student support and academic enrichment grants

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Subpart 1 of part A of title IV of the Elementary and Secondary Education Act of 1965, comprising this subpart, was originally added to Pub. L. 89–10, title IV, by Pub. L. 107–110, title IV, §401, Jan. 8, 2002, 115 Stat. 1735. Subpart 1 is shown herein, however, as having been added by Pub. L. 114–95, title IV, §4101, Dec. 10, 2015, 129 Stat. 1968, without reference to the amendments by Pub. L. 107–110 because of the extensive revision of subpart 1 by Pub. L. 114–95.
##### 



EXHIBIT 32

CERTIFICATION OF 10-Q REPORT
OF
CROWN MEDIA HOLDINGS, INC.

FOR THE QUARTER ENDED JUNE 30, 2003



|1. |  | The undersigned are the Chief Executive Officer and the Chief
Financial Officer of Crown Media Holdings, Inc. (Crown Media
Holdings). This Certification is made pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. This Certification accompanies the 10-Q
Report of Crown Media Holdings for the quarter ended June 30, 2003.
|-- |  | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|  
|2. |  | We certify that such 10-Q Report fully complies with the requirements
of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and
that the information contained in such 10-Q Report fairly presents, in
all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
of Crown Media Holdings.                      

This Certification is executed as of August 14, 2003.

| |                                             | 
| | ------------------------------------------- | 
| | /s/ DAVID J. EVANS                          | 
| |                                             | 
| | David J. Evans, President and               | 
| | Chief Executive Officer                     | 
| |                                             | 
| |                                             | 
| | /s/ WILLIAM J. ALIBER                       | 
| |                                             | 
| | William J. Aliber, Executive Vice President | 
| | and Chief Financial Officer                 | 

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to Crown Media Holdings, Inc. and will be retained by Crown Media
Holdings, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its
staff upon request.
March 2024

STORAGE COMPUTED* SPRING SHASTA EVAP

ACRE-FEET INFLOW CR. P. P. RELEASE RELEASE - C.F.S. C. F. S.

DAY ELEV RES. CHANGE C.F.S. RELEASE C. F. S. POWER SPILL FISHTRAP (1)

19,350

1 579.41 19,192 -158 19,304 1,764 18,599 7,953 11,345 85 1

2 578.93 18,923 -269 16,460 1,721 15,904 8,279 8,232 85 0

3 579.28 19,119 196 15,438 1,745 14,828 8,734 6,520 85 0

4 579.27 19,114 -5 15,257 1,739 14,611 8,747 6,428 85 0

5 582.38 20,913 1,799 16,011 1,747 14,654 7,757 7,261 85 1

6 582.49 20,979 66 15,209 1,723 13,941 8,497 6,594 85 0

7 582.04 20,710 -269 15,015 1,365 14,174 7,248 7,818 85 0

8 579.69 19,350 -1,360 14,567 1,754 13,604 7,311 7,856 85 1

9 579.89 19,462 112 15,257 1,717 14,406 8,205 6,909 85 2

10 580.88 20,031 569 15,228 1,615 14,352 7,503 7,352 85 1

11 581.28 20,264 233 15,341 1,731 14,270 8,294 6,845 85 0

12 579.48 19,232 -1,032 14,580 1,659 13,669 7,856 7,159 85 0

13 580.68 19,916 684 15,523 1,747 14,265 8,057 7,035 85 1

14 580.66 19,904 -12 13,075 1,734 12,012 8,153 4,841 85 2

15 582.85 21,193 1,289 12,006 1,721 10,668 8,491 2,777 85 3

16 584.33 22,094 901 10,168 976 9,453 8,491 1,135 85 3

17 584.42 22,149 55 8,236 471 7,923 6,471 1,649 85 3

18 583.75 21,738 -411 6,887 461 6,525 6,998 7 85 4

19 585.60 22,884 1,146 6,712 1,095 5,555 6,043 4 85 2

20 586.17 23,243 359 6,031 986 5,068 5,131 632 85 2

21 583.30 21,465 -1,778 4,785 113 4,574 5,439 155 85 2

22 584.69 22,316 851 5,835 327 5,297 5,318 0 85 3

23 585.99 23,129 813 5,749 399 4,864 5,231 23 85 0

24 585.07 22,551 -578 4,800 287 4,271 5,006 0 85 0

25 584.65 22,291 -260 4,748 125 4,368 4,794 0 85 0

26 582.72 21,116 -1,175 4,031 199 3,569 4,247 290 85 1

27 584.39 22,131 1,015 4,960 44 4,557 4,360 0 85 3

28 582.91 21,229 -902 3,884 546 3,024 4,253 0 85 1

29 583.82 21,781 552 4,317 393 3,598 3,954 0 85 0

30 584.33 22,094 313 4,184 44 3,965 3,941 0 85 0

31 584.33 22,094 0 4,031 44 3,899 3,946 0 85 0

TOTALS 2,744 317,629 31,992 294,467 204,708 108,86

7

2,635 36

ACRE-FEET 2,744 630,017 63,456 584,075 406,038 215,93

8

5,227 71

*COMPUTED INFLOW IS SUM OF CHANGE IN STORAGE, RELEASES, AND EVAPORATION.

(1) EVAPORATION RECORDS TAKEN FROM SHASTA PAN.

SUMMARY

Release (ACRE-FEET)

Power 406,038

Historical Archive and Report Database

Keswick Reservoir Daily Operations

Run Date: 4/23/2024
Spill 215,938

Fish Trap 5,227

Historical Archive and Report Database

Keswick Reservoir Daily Operations

Run Date: 4/23/2024
(No. 75-CC-0544

#### Helen Bruszkiewicz, Claimant, *v.*State of Illinois, Respondent.

*Opinion filed July 24, 1978.*

Bradley, Bradley, Lyon & Nedderman, Attorneys for Claimant.

William J. Scott, Attorney General; James O. Stola, Assistant Attorney General, for Respondent.

Holderman, J.

Claimant heretofore filed a claim against the State of Illinois alleging that while she was a patient at the Chicago Read Mental Health Center on December 3, 1973, she was a victim of a rape attack. Claimant *550alleges that on the night in question, she, in the company of other females, went to the gymnasium on the grounds of the Center to play volleyball. At the Center, she alleges she was pulled out of the auditorium by one James Hatter, Theresa Chism and one other girl and was taken to the back of the gymnasium where the three individuals held her on the ground, removed her clothing, and James Hatter then had sexual intercourse with her against her will. She alleges she then went back to where she lived and reported the rape to her counselor, and she was then taken to the medical building for an examination. Before the medical examination, however, she left the Center and returned to her home but returned to the Center the following day where she was examined medically.

Claimant further alleges she is now “very paranoid of black men” and that she has nightmares almost every week.

An inmate of the Chicago Read Mental Health Center, Monticello Coleman, was called as a witness on behalf of Claimant and he testified he was a patient at the facility and witnessed the assault on Claimant. He testified he went back to the gymnasium to notify the security guard who laughed, thinking what he told him was a joke.

Respondent offered no testimony regarding the occurrence but submitted into evidence five exhibits pertaining to Claimant’s confinement at the Health Center.

Briefs were not submitted by either Claimant or Respondent.

The record indicates that Claimant had psychiatric problems before and since the incident in question.

*551I have made a search of the records of the Court of Claims to see if there were any guidelines in cases of this nature. I have also checked volumes back to the year 1948 and find no cases similar to the one at hand to give some basis for fixing the amount of the damages.

It appears from the record that Claimant was assaulted and raped and that Respondent was negligent in failing to provide adequate protection and security for its inmates, particularly Claimant herein.

In view of all the circumstances, the Court believes an award of $2,500.00 is fitting and proper in this case.

An award is hereby entered in favor of Claimant in the amount of $2,500.00.
###### Editorial Note on Part 44

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 44 appear by T.D. ATF-464, 66 FR 43480, Aug. 20, 2001, and T.D. ATF-480, 67 FR 30801-30803, May 8, 2002.

#### § 44.213 Destruction of tobacco products, and cigarette papers and tubes.

Where an export warehouse proprietor desires to destroy any of the tobacco products, or cigarette papers or tubes stored in his warehouse, he shall notify the appropriate TTB officer of the kind and quantity of such articles to be destroyed and the date on which he desires the destruction to take place in order that the appropriate TTB officer may assign an appropriate TTB officer to inspect the articles and supervise their destruction. The export warehouse proprietor shall prepare a notice of removal, Form 5200.14, describing the articles to be destroyed. After witnessing the destruction of the articles, the appropriate TTB officer shall certify to their destruction on two copies of the notice of removal and return them to the export warehouse proprietor, who shall retain one copy for his records and file the other copy with the appropriate TTB officer.

[T.D. 6871, 31 FR 55, Jan. 4, 1966. Redesignated at 40 FR 16835, Apr. 15, 1975, and amended by T.D. ATF-232, 51 FR 28089, Aug. 5, 1986; T.D. ATF-243, 51 FR 43194, Dec. 1, 1986; T.D. ATF-421, 64 FR 71926, Dec. 22, 1999]