20296 Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 70 / Tuesday, April 12, 2011 / Proposed Rules 

TABLE 2—COMPLETENESS PERCENTAGES FOR COUNTIES IN THE BI-STATE CHARLOTTE, NORTH AND SOUTH CAROLINA

NONATTAINMENT AREA OR THE 1997 8-HOUR OZONE NAAQS 

Location AQS site ID 2008 (%) 2009 (%) 2010 (%) 

2008–2010 

Completeness average (%) 

Lincoln County (NC) ........... 1487 Riverview Rd. (37–109–0004) ............................... 97 98 96 97 

Mecklen- .............................

burg County (NC) ...............

1130 Eastway Dr (37–119–0041) ................................... 100 97 99 99 

Mecklen- .............................

burg County (NC) ...............

400 Westinghouse Blvd. (37–119–1005) ....................... 100 97 99 99 

Mecklen- .............................

burg County (NC) ...............

29 N @ Mecklenburg Cab Co. ( 37–119–1009) ............ 98 98 98 98 

Rowan County (NC) ........... 301 West St & Gold Hill Ave. (37–159–0021) ................ 93 91 95 93 

Rowan County (NC) ........... 925 N Enochville Ave. (37–159–0022) ........................... 99 97 93 96 

Union County (NC) ............. 701 Charles St. (37–179–0003) ..................................... 98 96 98 97 

EPA’s review of these data indicate 

that the bi-state Charlotte Area has met 

and continues to meet the 1997 8-hour 

ozone NAAQS. EPA is soliciting public 

comments on the issues discussed in 

this document. These comments will be 

considered before taking final action. 

V. Proposed Action 

EPA is proposing to determine that 

the Charlotte-Gastonia-Rock Hill, North 

Carolina-South Carolina 1997 8-hour 

nonattainment area has attained the 

1997 8-hour ozone NAAQS based on 

2008–2010 complete, quality-assured, 

quality-controlled and certified 

monitoring data. As provided in 40 CFR 

51.918, if EPA finalizes this 

determination, it would suspend the 

requirements for the States of North and 

South Carolina to submit, for the bi-state 

Charlotte Area, an attainment 

demonstrations and associated RACM 

analyses, RFP plans, contingency 

measures, and any other planning SIPs 

related to attainment of the 1997 8-hour 

ozone NAAQS as long as the Area 

continues to attain the 1997 8-hour 

ozone NAAQS. 

VI. Statutory and Executive Order 

Reviews 

This action proposes to make a 

determination of attainment based on 

air quality, and would, if finalized, 

result in the suspension of certain 

federal requirements, and it would not 

impose additional requirements beyond 

those imposed by state law. For that 

reason, this proposed action: 

• Is not a ‘‘significant regulatory 

action’’ subject to review by the Office 

of Management and Budget under 

Executive Order 12866 (58 FR 51735, 

October 4, 1993); 

• Does not impose an information 

collection burden under the provisions 

of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 

U.S.C. 3501 et seq.); 

• Is certified as not having a 

significant economic impact on a 

substantial number of small entities 

under the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 

U.S.C. 601 et seq.); 

• Does not contain any unfunded 

mandate or significantly or uniquely 

affect small governments, as described 

in the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act 

of 1995 (Pub. L. 104–4); 

• Does not have Federalism 

implications as specified in Executive 

Order 13132 (64 FR 43255, August 10, 

1999); 

• Is not an economically significant 

regulatory action based on health or 

safety risks subject to Executive Order 

13045 (62 FR 19885, April 23, 1997); 

• is not a significant regulatory action 

subject to Executive Order 13211 (66 FR 

28355, May 22, 2001); 

• Is not subject to requirements of 

Section 12(d) of the National 

Technology Transfer and Advancement 

Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C. 272 note) because 

application of those requirements would 

be inconsistent with the CAA; and 

• Does not provide EPA with the 

discretionary authority to address, as 

appropriate, disproportionate human 

health or environmental effects, using 

practicable and legally permissible 

methods, under Executive Order 12898 

(59 FR 7629, February 16, 1994). In 

addition, this proposed 1997 8-hour 

ozone clean NAAQS data determination 

for the bi-state Charlotte Area does not 

have tribal implications as specified by 

Executive Order 13175 (65 FR 67249, 

November 9, 2000), because the SIP is 

not approved to apply in Indian country 

located in the state, and EPA notes that 

it will not impose substantial direct 

costs on tribal governments or preempt 

tribal law. 

List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52 

Environmental protection, Air 

pollution control, Intergovernmental 

relations, Oxides of nitrogen, Ozone, 

Reporting and recordkeeping 

requirements, Volatile organic 

compounds. 

Dated: March 31, 2011. 

A. Stanley Meiburg, 

Acting Regional Administrator, Region 4. 

[FR Doc. 2011–8705 Filed 4–11–11; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 6560–50–P 

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION 

AGENCY 

40 CFR Part 52 

[EPA–R04–OAR–2006–0130–201111(b); 

FRL–9293–5] 

Approval and Promulgation of 

Implementation Plans: Florida; 

Prevention of Significant Deterioration 

AGENCY: Environmental Protection 

Agency (EPA). 

ACTION: Proposed rule. 

SUMMARY: EPA is proposing to convert a 

conditional approval of provisions in 

the Florida State Implementation Plan 

(SIP) to a full approval under the federal 

Clean Air Act (CAA). On June 17, 2009, 

the State of Florida, through the Florida 

Department of Environmental 

Protection, submitted a SIP revision in 

response to the conditional approval of 

its New Source Review (NSR) 

permitting program. The revision 

includes changes to certain parts of the 

Prevention of Significant Deterioration 

construction permit program in Florida, 

including the definition of ‘‘new 

emissions unit,’’ ‘‘regulated air 

pollutant’’ and ‘‘significant emissions 

rate’’ as well as recordkeeping 

requirements. In addition, Florida 

provided a clarification that the 

significant emissions rate for mercury in 

the Florida regulations is intended to 

apply as a state-only provision. EPA has 

determined that this revision addresses 

the conditions identified in the 


erowe on DSK5CLS3C1PROD with PROPOSALS-1
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 70 / Tuesday, April 12, 2011 / Proposed Rules 20297 

conditional approval, and is therefore 

approvable. In the Final Rules section of 

this Federal Register, EPA is approving 

the State’s SIP revision as a direct final 

rule without prior proposal because the 

Agency views this as a noncontroversial 

submittal and anticipates no adverse 

comments. This proposed action is 

being taken pursuant to section 110 of 

the CAA. 

DATES: Written comments must be 

received on or before May 12, 2011. 

ADDRESSES: Submit your comments, 

identified by Docket ID No. EPA–R04– 

OAR–2006–0130, by one of the 

following methods: 

1. http://www.regulations.gov: Follow 

the on-line instructions for submitting 

comments. 

2. E-mail: adams.yolanda@epa.gov. 

3. Fax: (404) 562–9019. 

4. Mail: EPA–R04–OAR–2006–0130 

Air Planning Branch, Air, Pesticides and 

Toxics Management Division, U.S. 

Environmental Protection Agency, 

Region 4, 61 Forsyth Street, SW., 

Atlanta, Georgia 30303–8960. 

5. Hand Delivery or Courier: Ms. 

Yolanda Adams, Air Planning Branch, 

Air, Pesticides and Toxics Management 

Division, U.S. Environmental Protection 

Agency, Region 4, 61 Forsyth Street, 

SW., Atlanta, Georgia 30303–8960. Such 

deliveries are only accepted during the 

Regional Office’s normal hours of 

operation. The Regional Office’s official 

hours of business are Monday through 

Friday, 8:30 to 4:30, excluding federal 

holidays. 

Please see the direct final rule which 

is located in the Rules section of this 

Federal Register for detailed 

instructions on how to submit 

comments. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For 

information regarding the Florida SIP, 

contact Twunjala Bradley, Regulatory 

Development Section, Air Planning 

Branch, Air, Pesticides and Toxics 

Management Division, U.S. 

Environmental Protection Agency, 

Region 4, 61 Forsyth Street, SW., 

Atlanta, Georgia 30303–8960. Ms. 

Bradley may also be reached via 

telephone or electronic mail at (404) 

562–9352 and 

bradley.twunjala@epa.gov. For 

information regarding NSR, contact 

Yolanda Adams, Air Permits Section, at 

the same address above. Ms. Adams 

may also be reached via telephone or 

electronic mail at (404) 562–9214 and 

adams.yolanda@epa.gov. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: For 

additional information see the direct 

final rule which is published in the 

Rules Section of this Federal Register. 

A detailed rationale for the approval is 

set forth in the direct final rule. If no 

adverse comments are received in 

response to this rule, no further activity 

is contemplated. If EPA receives adverse 

comments, the direct final rule will be 

withdrawn and all public comments 

received will be addressed in a 

subsequent final rule based on this 

proposed rule. EPA will not institute a 

second comment period on this 

document. Any parties interested in 

commenting on this document should 

do so at this time. 

Dated: March 31, 2011. 

A. Stanley Meiburg, 

Acting Regional Administrator, Region 4. 

[FR Doc. 2011–8700 Filed 4–11–11; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 6560–50–P 

FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS 

COMMISSION 

47 CFR Parts 1, 6, 7, and 8 

[CG Docket No. 10–213; WT Docket No. 96– 

198; CG Docket No. 10–145; DA 11–595] 

Implementing the Provisions of the 

Communications Act of 1934, as 

Enacted by the Twenty-First Century 

Communications and Video 

Accessibility Act of 2010 

AGENCY: Federal Communications 

Commission. 

ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking; 

extension of comment period. 

SUMMARY: In this document, the 

Commission extends the comment and 

reply comment period deadlines. This 

action is taken in order to provide a 

limited extension to serve the public 

interest by allowing parties additional 

time to fully and carefully analyze the 

Notice of Proposed Rulemaking 

proposing to adopt rules that implement 

provisions in section 104 of the 

‘‘Twenty-first Century Communications 

and Video Accessibility Act of 2010.’’ 

DATES: Submit comments on or before 

April 25, 2011. Submit reply comments 

on or before May 23, 2011. 

ADDRESSES: Federal Communications 

Commission, 445 12th Street, SW., 

Washington, DC 20554. You may submit 

comments, identified by DA 11–595, or 

by CG Docket No. 10–213, WT Docket 

No. 96–198, CG Docket No. 10–145, by 

any of the following methods: 

• Federal eRulemaking Portal: http:// 

www.regulations.gov. Follow the 

instructions for submitting comments. 

• Federal Communications 

Commission’s Web Site: http:// 

www.fcc.gov/cgb/ecfs/. Follow the 

instructions for submitting comments. 

• People with Disabilities: Contact the 

FCC to request reasonable 

accommodations (accessible format 

documents, sign language interpreters, 

CART, etc.) by e-mail: FCC504@fcc.gov 

or phone: (202) 418–0530 or TTY: (202) 

418–0432. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Jeffrey Tignor, Broadband Division, 

Wireless Telecommunications Bureau, 

FCC at (202) 418–0774 or via the 

Internet to Jeffrey.Tignor@fcc.gov or 

Rosaline Crawford, Disability Rights 

Office, Consumer and Governmental 

Affairs Bureau, FCC at (202) 418–2075 

or via the Internet to 

Rosaline.Crawford@fcc.gov. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This is a 

summary of an Order, DA 11–595, 

adopted and released by the FCC on 

April 4, 2011, in CG Docket No. 10–213; 

WT Docket No. 96–198; CG Docket No. 

10–145; FCC 11–37. The full text of this 

document is available for inspection 

and copying during normal business 

hours in the FCC Reference Information 

Center, Room CY–A257, 445 12th Street, 

SW., Washington, DC 20554. The 

complete text may be purchased from 

the Commission’s duplicating 

contractor, Best Copy and Printing, Inc. 

(BCPI), Portals II, 445 12th Street, SW., 

Room CY–B402, Washington, DC 20554, 

(202) 488–5300, facsimile (202) 488– 

5563, or via e-mail at fcc@bcpiweb.com. 

The complete text is also available on 

the Commission’s Web site at http:// 

wireless.fcc.gov/edocs—public/ 

attachment/DA 11-595A1doc. This full 

text may also be downloaded at: 

http://wireless.fcc.gov/releases.html. 

Alternative formats (computer diskette, 

large print, audio cassette, and Braille) 

are available by contacting Brian Millin 

at (202) 418–7426, TTY (202) 418–7365, 

or via e-mail to bmillin@fcc.gov. 

Summary 

This Order extends the deadlines for 

filing comments and reply comments 

concerning the Commission’s Notice of 

Proposed Rulemaking proposing to 

adopt rules that implement provisions 

in Section 104 of the ‘‘Twenty-First 

Century Communications and Video 

Accessibility Act of 2010’’ (hereinafter 

referred to as the ‘‘CVAA’’). See 

Implementation of Sections 716 and 717 

of the Communications Act of 1934, as 

Enacted by the Twenty-First Century 

Communications and Video 

Accessibility Act of 2010, CG Docket No. 

10–213, Amendments to the 

Commission’s Rules Implementing 

Sections 255 and 251(a)(2) of the 

Communications Act of 1934, as 

Enacted by the Telecommunications Act 

of 1996, WT Docket No. 96–198, 


erowe on DSK5CLS3C1PROD with PROPOSALS-1