alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Editorial Note on Part 46
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 46 appear by T.D. ATF-457, 66 FR 32220, 32221, June 14, 2001.

§ 46.4 Ultimate burden. For the purposes of this subpart, the claimant, or owner, shall be treated as having borne the ultimate burden of an amount of tax only if: ( a ) He has not, directly or indirectly, been relieved of such burden or shifted such burden to any other person,
( b ) No understanding or agreement exists for any such relief or shifting, and
( c ) If he has neither sold nor contracted to sell the articles involved in such claim, he agrees that there will be no such relief or shifting, and furnishes bond as provided in § 46.10.
Exhibit
32.1





CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906


OF
THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Annual Report on
Form 10-Q of Presidential Realty Corporation (the “Company”) for the period
ending March 31, 2009, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on
the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Jeffrey F. Joseph, Chief Executive Officer of
the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my
knowledge:





(1)
            the
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934:
and





(2)
            the
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and the results of operations of the
      Company.





Presidential
      Realty CorporationBy:
                  /s/
      Jeffrey F. JosephJeffrey
      F. JosephChief
      Executive Officer





Date: May
11, 2009
Editorial Note on Part 555
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 555 appear by T.D. ATF-487, 68 FR 3748, Jan. 24, 2003.

§ 555.54 Change of address. ( a ) During the term of a license or permit, a licensee or permittee may move his business or operations to a new address at which he intends to regularly carry on his business or operations, without procuring a new license or permit. However, in every case, the licensee or permittee shall— ( 1 ) Give notification of the new location of the business or operations to the Chief, Federal Explosives Licensing Center at least 10 days before the move; and
( 2 ) Submit the license or permit to the Chief, Federal Explosives Licensing Center. The Chief, Federal Explosives Licensing Center will issue an amended license or permit, which will contain the new address (and new license or permit number, if any).
( b ) Licensees and permittees whose mailing address will change must notify the Chief, Federal Explosives Licensing Center, at least 10 days before the change.
(Paragraph (b) approved by the Office of Management and Budget under control number 1140-0080) [T.D. ATF-87, 46 FR 40384, Aug. 7, 1981, as amended by T.D. ATF-290, 54 FR 53054, Dec. 27, 1989; ATF No. 1, 68 FR 13786, Mar. 20, 2003; ATF 2013R-9F, 79 FR 46693, Aug. 11, 2014]
Exhibit 32.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

         In connection with the Annual Report of Specialized Health Products
International, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-KSB for the period ending
December 31, 2003 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the
date hereof (the "Report"), I, Keith L. Merrell, Acting Chief Financial Officer
of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to
ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

         (1)      The Report fully complies with the requirements of section
                  13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2)      The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
                  all material respects, the financial condition and result of
                  operations of the Company.

/s/ Keith L. Merrell
---------------------------------
Acting Chief Financial Officer
March 23, 2004
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Juan Daniel ALDAPE-GARCIA, also known as Jose Eloy Reyes, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 05-11121

Conference Calendar.

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.

July 13, 2006.

Denise B. Williams, U.S. Attorney’s Office Northern District of Texas, Lubbock, TX, for Plaintiff-Appellee.

David E. Sloan, Federal Public Defender’s Office Northern District of Texas, Lubbock, TX, for Defendant-Appellant.

*380Before DAVIS, BARKSDALE, and DeMOSS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: *

Appealing the Judgment in a Criminal Case, Juan Daniel Adape-Garcia raises arguments that are foreclosed by *Almendarez-Torres v. United States,*523 U.S. 224, 235, 118 S.Ct. 1219, 140 L.Ed.2d 350 (1998), which held that 8 U.S.C. § 1326(b)(2) is a penalty provision and not a separate criminal offense. The Government’s motion for summary affirmance is GRANTED, and the judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.

*

 Pursuant to 5th Cir R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.
###### Editorial Note on Part 20

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 20 appear by T.D. ATF-235, 66 FR 5473, Jan. 19, 2001, and T.D. ATF-463 and T.D. ATF-462, 66 FR 42733, 42736, Aug. 15, 2001.

#### § 20.1 General.

The regulations in this part relate to denatured distilled spirits and cover the procurement, use, disposition, and recovery of denatured alcohol, specially denatured rum, and articles containing denatured spirits.
#### § 31.172 Place of filing.

Records of receipt and disposition and monthly summary reports required by §§ 31.155, 31.156, and 31.160 must be maintained at the dealer's place of business. The appropriate TTB officer may, upon request, authorize maintenance of files, or an individual file, at another business location under the control of the same wholesale dealer, when it is determined that such maintenance will not cause undue inconvenience to TTB officers desiring to examine those files.

(26 U.S.C. 5123)
Administrative Services Agreement between the Registrant and the Sponsor



 Exhibit 10.10
 November __, 2007 
 United Refining Inc. 
 823 11th Avenue

 New York, New York 10019 
  

	 	Re:	UNITED REFINING ENERGY CORP. 

 Gentlemen: 
 This letter will confirm our agreement, that commencing on the effective date (“Effective Date”) of the registration statement
(“Registration Statement”) of the initial public offering (“IPO”) of the securities of United Refining Energy Corp. (the “Company”) and continuing until the earlier to occur of: (i) the consummation of a Business
Combination (as described in the Registration Statement) and (ii) the date on which we determine to dissolve and liquidate our trust account as part of our plan of dissolution and liquidation pursuant to the Company’s Amended and Restated
Certificate of Incorporation, United Refining, Inc. shall make available to the Company certain general and administrative services, including but not limited to receptionist, secretarial and general office services. In exchange therefore, the
Company shall pay United Refining, Inc. the sum of $7,500 per month on the Effective Date and continuing monthly thereafter. 
 [signature
page follows] 










			
	Very truly yours,
	
	UNITED REFINING ENERGY CORP
		
	By:	 	 
		 	Name:
		 	Title:


  

			
	Agreed to and Accepted by:
	
	UNITED REFINING, INC.
		
	By:	 	 
		 	Name:
		 	Title:
#### ARENDI U.S.A., INC. and Arendi Holding Limited, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. MICROSOFT CORPORATION, Defendant-Cross Appellant.

No. 05-1170, 05-1171.

United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit.

Feb. 8, 2006.

Before MAYER, SCHALL, and PROST, Circuit Judges.

Judgment

PER CURIAM:

This CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED:

*AFFIRMED. See*Fed. Cir. R. 36.
## COURT OF APPEALS

SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS

FORT WORTH

NO. 02

- 15

- 00473

- CR

Marqiest Jamal Lusk

v.

The State of Texas §

§

§

§

§ From Criminal District Court No. 3

o f Tarrant County (1374649D )

June 23, 2016

Opinion by Justice Walker

(nfp)



### JUDGMENT

This court has considered the record on appeal in this case and holds that

there was no error in the trial court’s judgment. It is ordered that the judgment of

the trial court is affirmed.

SECOND DISTRICT COURT OF APPEA LS

By

_ /s/ Sue Walker

____________________ Justice Sue Walker
|  |  | [if !vml]>[endif]>

You have  reached the Federal Depository Library Program Electronic Collection  (FDLP/EC) Archive. This archive assures ongoing access to publications in the  FDLP/EC. Access to publications in the archive is available through GPO's  suite of cataloging and locator services, including the Catalog of U.S.  Government Publications (CGP).
Title: National  compensation survey. State and local  government. Raleigh-Durham-Cary, NC
SuDocs Number: L 2.121/33:R 13/
Item    Number: 0768-B-33    (online)
GPO    System Number: 000865083
 
 
 
2008
 
2007
 
 
 
A service of the Superintendent of Documents,  U.S. Government Printing Office..

 

Last updated:  April 21, 2020  Page Name:  http://permanent.access.gpo.gov/
perm |
|--|--|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 71 (Wednesday, April 13, 2011)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 20550-20551]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2011-8794]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

40 CFR Part 1042


Control of Emissions From New and In-Use Marine Compression-
Ignition Engines and Vessels

CFR Correction

    In Title 40 of the Code of Federal Regulations, Part 1000 to End, 
revised as of July 1, 2010, on page 240, in Sec.  1042.901, the 
definition of ``New vessel'' is reinstated to read as follows:


Sec.  1042.901  Definitions.

* * * * *
    New vessel means any of the following:
    (1) A vessel for which the ultimate purchaser has never received 
the equitable or legal title. The vessel is no longer new when the 
ultimate purchaser receives this title or it is placed into service, 
whichever comes first.
    (2) For vessels with no Category 3 engines, a vessel that has been 
modified such that the value of the modifications exceeds 50 percent of 
the value of the modified vessel, excluding temporary modifications (as 
defined in this section). The value of the modification is the 
difference in the assessed value of the vessel before the modification 
and the assessed value of the vessel after the

[[Page 20551]]

modification. The vessel is no longer new when it is placed into 
service. Use the following equation to determine if the fractional 
value of the modification exceeds 50 percent:
    Percent of value = [(Value after modification)(Value before 
modification)] x 100% / (Value after modification)
    (3) For vessels with Category 3 engines, a vessel that has 
undergone a modification that substantially alters the dimensions or 
carrying capacity of the vessel, changes the type of vessel, or 
substantially prolongs the vessel's life.
    (4) An imported vessel that has already been placed into service, 
where it has an engine not covered by a certificate of conformity 
issued under this part at the time of importation that was manufactured 
after the requirements of this part start to apply (see Sec.  1042.1).
* * * * *
[FR Doc. 2011-8794 Filed 4-12-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 1505-01-D
Exhibit 32
CERTIFICATION OF ANNUAL REPORT ON FORM 10-K
OF
NATIONAL BANCSHARES CORPORATION
FOR THE FISCAL YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2004
     The undersigned are the President and Treasurer of National Bancshares Corporation. ThisCertification is made pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. ThisCertification accompanies the Annual Report on Form 10-K of National Bancshares Corporation for thefiscal year ended December 31, 2004.
     We certify that the Annual Report on Form 10-K fully complies with the requirements of Section13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained in the10-K Report fairly presents in all material respects the financial condition and results ofoperations of National Bancshares Corporation.
     This Certification is executed as of March 29, 2005.          /s/ Charles J. Dolezal        Charles J. Dolezal, President and Chief Executive Officer            /s/ Lawrence M. Cardinal, Jr.         Lawrence M. Cardinal, Jr., Treasurer   (principal financial officer)
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

May 1, 2017

No. 04-16-00636-CV

Kevin W. LILES, Bryan K. Harris, Stuart R. White, James L. Ray and Kyle D. Giacco (CrossAppellees),

Appellants

v.

Maria Isabel Serna CONTRERAS as next friend and guardian of Samara Isabella Morales Serna 

and Samantha Isabel Morales Serna, Minor Children (Cross-Appellant),

Appellees

From the 341st Judicial District Court, Webb County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2014CVT001295 D3

Honorable Rebecca Ramirez Palomo, Judge Presiding

O R D E R

The joint motion to consolidate and extend appellees’ brief deadlines are hereby 

GRANTED. Time is extended to May 22, 2017.

_________________________________

Rebeca C. Martinez, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said 

court on this 1st day of May, 2017.

___________________________________

Keith E. Hottle

Clerk of Court
### §1068c. Cooperative arrangements

#### (a) General authority

The Secretary may make grants to encourage cooperative arrangements—

(1) with funds available to carry out part A, between institutions eligible for assistance under part A and between such institutions and institutions not receiving assistance under this subchapter; or

(2) with funds available to carry out part B, between institutions eligible for assistance under part B and institutions not receiving assistance under this subchapter;

for the activities described in section 1057(b) of this title or section 1062 of this title, as the case may be, so that the resources of the cooperating institutions might be combined and shared to achieve the purposes of such parts and avoid costly duplicative efforts and to enhance the development of part A and part B eligible institutions.

#### (b) Priority

The Secretary shall give priority to grants for the purposes described under subsection (a) whenever the Secretary determines that the cooperative arrangement is geographically and economically sound or will benefit the applicant institution.

#### (c) Duration

Grants to institutions having a cooperative arrangement may be made under this section for a period as determined under section 1059 of this title or section 1062 of this title.

(Pub. L. 89–329, title III, §394, formerly §354, as added Pub. L. 99–498, title III, §301(a), Oct. 17, 1986, 100 Stat. 1305; renumbered §394, Pub. L. 105–244, title III, §301(a)(2), Oct. 7, 1998, 112 Stat. 1636.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section was formerly classified to section 1069 of this title prior to renumbering by Pub. L. 105–244.
###### Editorial Note on Part 28

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 28 appear by T.D. ATF-477, 67 FR 18087 through 18090, Apr. 15, 2002.

#### § 28.65 [Reserved]
### §§511 to 513. Repealed. Pub. L. 96–374, title VI, §601(c)(1), Oct. 3, 1980, 94 Stat. 1471

Section 511, Pub. L. 85–864, title VI, §601, Sept. 2, 1958, 72 Stat. 1593; Pub. L. 87–344, title II, §205(a), Oct. 3, 1961, 75 Stat. 760; Pub. L. 88–210, title II, §206(a), formerly §26(a), Dec. 18, 1963, 77 Stat. 418, renumbered Pub. L. 90–576, title I, §101(a)(1), Oct. 16, 1968, 82 Stat. 1064; Pub. L. 88–665, title VI, §601(a), Oct. 16, 1964, 78 Stat. 1106; Pub. L. 89–698, title II, §201, Oct. 29, 1966, 80 Stat. 1069; Pub. L. 90–575, title III, §331(a), Oct. 16, 1968, 82 Stat. 1057; Pub. L. 92–318, title I, §182(a), June 23, 1972, 86 Stat. 311, provided for language and area centers and programs. See section 1121 et seq. of this title.

Section 512, Pub. L. 85–864, title VI, §602, Sept. 2, 1958, 72 Stat. 1594; Pub. L. 94–482, title III, §302(d), Oct. 12, 1976, 90 Stat. 2216; Pub. L. 96–88, title III, §301(a)(1), title V, §507, Oct. 17, 1979, 93 Stat. 677, 692, authorized a program of research and studies. See section 1125 of this title.

Section 512a, Pub. L. 85–864, title VI, §603, as added Pub. L. 94–482, title III, §302(b), Oct. 12, 1976, 90 Stat. 2215; Pub. L. 96–88, title III, §301(a)(1), title V, §507, Oct. 17, 1979, 93 Stat. 677, 692, provided for a program of grants and contracts for promotion of cultural understanding.

Section 513, Pub. L. 85–864, title VI, §604, formerly §603, Sept. 2, 1958, 72 Stat. 1594; Pub. L. 88–665, title VI, §601(b), Oct. 16, 1964, 78 Stat. 1107; Pub. L. 90–575, title III, §331(b), Oct. 16, 1968, 82 Stat. 1057; Pub. L. 92–318, title I, §182(b), June 23, 1972, 86 Stat. 312; renumbered and amended Pub. L. 94–482, title III, §302(b), (c), Oct. 12, 1976, 90 Stat. 2215, 2216; Pub. L. 95–43, §1(c), June 15, 1977, 91 Stat. 219; Pub. L. 96–49, §15, Aug. 13, 1979, 93 Stat. 354, authorized appropriations for foreign studies and language development program. See section 1130b of this title.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date of Repeal

Repeal effective Oct. 1, 1980, see section 1393 of Pub. L. 96–374, set out as an Effective Date of 1980 Amendment note under section 1001 of this title.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

DAY ELEV

 492.58

 492.05

 491.58

 491.12

 490.72

 490.41

 490.10

 489.80

 489.47

 489.16

 488.82

 488.49

 488.20

 487.91

 487.65

 487.41

 487.16

 486.70

 486.11

 485.54

 485.03

 484.58

 484.13

 483.55

 482.96

 482.49

 482.05

 482.13

 194.5

 193.0

 191.8

 190.5

 189.4

 188.6

 187.7

 186.9

 186.0

 185.2

 184.3

 183.4

 182.7

 181.9

 181.2

 180.6

 179.9

 178.7

 177.2

 175.7

 174.4

 173.2

 172.1

 170.6

 169.1

 167.9

 166.8

 167.0

STORAGE

-1.5

-1.5

-1.3

-1.3

-1.1

-0.8

-0.8

-0.8

-0.9

-0.8

-0.9

-0.9

-0.8

-0.8

-0.7

-0.6

-0.7

-1.2

-1.5

-1.5

-1.3

-1.2

-1.2

-1.5

-1.5

-1.2

-1.1

+0.2

CHANGE

15

35

78

8

97

169

82

51

12

73

47

94

140

67

59

90

93

21

38

56

3

16

75

3

9

162

44

347

INFLOW

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

MADERA

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

SPILL

 432

 446

 442

 438

 435

 385

 322

 298

 325

 379

 398

 428

 420

 344

 299

 298

 296

 488

 655

 638

 510

 445

 513

 606

 641

 643

 481

 133

FRIANT-KERN

 7

 10

 7

 4

 10

 7

 7

 9

 10

 12

 6

 9

 9

 11

 6

 11

 17

 6

 9

 12

 7

 13

 12

 11

 12

 15

 21

 13

C.F.S.

 .08

 .11

 .08

 .05

 .11

 .08

 .08

 .10

 .11

 .14

 .07

 .11

 .10

 .13

 .07

 .13

 .20

 .07

 .11

 .14

 .08

 .16

 .15

 .14

 .15

 .19

 .26

 .16

INCHES

 .00

 .04

 .00

 .00

 .06

 .60

 .16

 .06

 .06

 .02

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .01

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .74

 .53

 .28

PRECIP

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

FEBRUARY 2014 MILLERTON LAKE DAILY OPERATIONS RUN DATE: March 1, 2014

IN LAKE

EVAPORATION

INCHES

C.F.S.

COMPUTED*

1000 ACRE-FEET

RELEASE - C.F.S. 

TOTALS -29.0 1,984 0 12,138 0 283 3.36 2.56

ACRE-FEET -29,040 3,935 0 24,076 0 561

COMMENTS:

* COMPUTED INFLOW IS THE SUM OF CHANGE IN STORAGE, RELEASES, PUMPING AND EVAPORATION.

SUMMARY

RELEASE (ACRE-FEET)

CANALS

FRIANT-KERN

MADERA

 24,076

 0 32,413

PRECIPITATION

THIS MONTH =

JULY 1, 2013 TO DATE = 4.65

 196.0

 8,337 2.56

CANALS

AT FRIANT

TOTAL RELEASES

OUTLET

 356

 316

 278

 200

 200

 200

 176

 151

 123

 100

 100

 99

 99

 99

 99

 99

 112

 134

 150

 150

 150

 140

 131

 130

 111

 100

 100

 100

RIVER

 4,203

 8,337

RIVER
Editorial Note on Part 20
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 20 appear by T.D. ATF-235, 66 FR 5473, Jan. 19, 2001, and T.D. ATF-463 and T.D. ATF-462, 66 FR 42733, 42736, Aug. 15, 2001.

§ 20.165 Storage facilities. ( a ) Storerooms shall be constructed and secured to prevent unauthorized access and the entrance doors shall be equipped for locking.
( b ) Each stationary tank used for the storage of specially denatured spirits shall be equipped for locking to control access to the denatured spirits. An accurate means of measuring its contents shall be provided for each tank.
( c ) Storerooms and storage tanks shall be kept locked when unattended. A storage cabinet or locker kept inside a room which is locked when unattended is considered to be adequately secured.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY HIGH

 262

 252

 262

 263

 277

 293

 290

 318

 321

 341

 369

 387

 410

 428

 453

 518

 489

 487

 513

 529

 522

 531

 532

 540

 541

 550

 549

 553

 542

 536

 583

 216

 214

 215

 215

 236

 219

 244

 247

 282

 291

 302

 309

 330

 362

 381

 391

 426

 434

 429

 446

 440

 432

 450

 476

 478

 479

 476

 435

 454

 472

 471

 240

 236

 240

 239

 256

 258

 265

 287

 296

 306

 323

 347

 374

 397

 413

 442

 449

 451

 461

 472

 472

 480

 488

 497

 499

 502

 498

 491

 491

 498

 514

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

JULY 2008 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: August 1, 2008

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

HOLLAND TRACT ON OLD RIVER