alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### § 24.212 High fermentation wine.

High fermentation wine is wine made with the addition of sugar within the limitations prescribed for natural wine except that the alcohol content after complete fermentation or complete fermentation and sweetening is more than 14 percent and wine spirits have not been added. Although high fermentation wine is not a standard wine, it is produced, stored, and handled on bonded wine premises subject to the same marking or labeling requirements.

(Sec. 201, Pub. L. 85-859, 72 Stat. 1381, as amended, 1387, as amended (26 U.S.C. 5365, 5388))
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

DAY ELEV

 122.91

 122.57

 123.00

 122.45

 122.15

 122.82

 122.34

 122.02

 123.18

 122.84

 123.34

 123.65

 123.81

 124.12

 123.83

 123.38

 122.52

 123.17

 123.18

 122.80

 122.85

 122.71

 123.60

 123.94

 122.66

 122.47

 120.99

 123.34

 123.54

 123.33

 7,751

 7,598

 7,791

 7,544

 7,409

 7,710

 7,494

 7,350

 7,876

 7,719

 7,951

 8,097

 8,172

 8,321

 8,181

 7,970

 7,575

 7,871

 7,876

 7,701

 7,724

 7,661

 8,073

 8,233

 7,638

 7,553

 6,917

 7,951

 8,045

 7,946

STORAGE

-92

-153

+193

-247

-135

+301

-216

-144

+526

-157

+232

+146

+75

+149

-140

-211

-395

+296

+5

-175

+23

-63

+412

+160

-595

-85

-636

+1,034

+94

-99

CHANGE

1,124

1,095

1,275

1,047

1,097

1,316

1,051

1,084

1,424

1,075

1,278

1,238

1,201

1,247

1,116

1,100

1,189

1,709

1,598

1,961

2,077

2,031

2,252

4,773

4,695

4,980

6,002

7,569

7,164

7,264

INFLOW

 1,109

 1,095

 1,092

 1,086

 1,076

 1,070

 1,063

 1,061

 1,063

 1,058

 1,066

 1,089

 1,103

 1,110

 1,111

 1,119

 1,300

 1,468

 1,500

 1,952

 1,968

 1,965

 1,946

 4,594

 4,898

 4,928

 4,934

 4,939

 4,939

 5,059

POWER

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 1,292

 2,012

 2,081

 2,161

SPILL

 60

 60

 60

 60

 60

 60

 60

 60

 60

 60

 60

 60

 60

 60

 60

 60

 60

 60

 60

 60

 60

 60

 60

 60

 60

 60

 60

 60

 60

 60

HATCHERY

 1

 2

 1

 1

 1

 2

 2

 1

 1

 1

 0

 0

 0

 2

 1

 2

 2

 2

 2

 2

 2

 3

 3

 3

 2

 0

 2

 2

 2

 2

C.F.S.

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

APRIL 2012 LAKE NATOMA DAILY OPERATIONS RUN DATE: May 1, 2012

IN LAKE

EVAP

C.F.S.

COMPUTED*

ACRE-FEET

RELEASE - C.F.S.

TOTALS +103 74,032 63,761 7,546 1,800 47

ACRE-FEET +103 146,842 126,470 14,967 3,570 93

COMMENTS:

* COMPUTED INFLOW IS THE SUM OF CHANGE IN STORAGE, RELEASES AND EVAPORATION.

SUMMARY

RELEASES (ACRE-FEET)

POWER 126,470

SPILL 14,967

FOLSOM SOUTH CANAL

HATCHERY

 1,638

 3,570

 7,843

FOLSOM

SOUTH 

CANAL

 0

 15

 25

 25

 28

 32

 35

 35

 35

 35

 35

 15

 0

 0

 15

 25

 26

 30

 33

 35

 35

 35

 35

 35

 35

 35

 35

 35

 35

 32

 826

 1,638

(1)

(1) INCHES OF EVAPORATION TAKEN FROM FOLSOM PAN.

RELEASES (ACRE-FEET)

TOTAL 146,645
Exhibit32.1

CERTIFICATION OF THE CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICERPURSUANTTO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

Inconnection with the filing by YouthStream Media Networks, Inc. (the‘‘Company’’) of its Quarterly Report onForm 10-QSB/A for the quarterly period ended March  31,2005 (the ‘‘Quarterly Report’’) with theSecurities and Exchange Commission, I, Jonathan V. Diamond, ChiefExecutive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-OxleyAct of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:

(1) TheQuarterly Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)The information contained in the Quarterly Report fairly presents, inall material respects, the financial condition and results ofoperations of the Company.

A signed original of thiswritten statement required by Section 906 has been provided to theCompany and will be retained by the Company and furnished to theSecurities and Exchange Commission or its staff uponrequest.

|                    |  |                                                                 |  |  |  |  |
|--------------------|--|-----------------------------------------------------------------|--|--|--|--|
| Date:March 7, 2006 |  | /s/ JONATHAN V. DIAMONDJonathan V.DiamondChief ExecutiveOfficer |
|                    |

----
###### Editorial Note on Part 30

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 30 appear by T.D. ATF-438, 66 FR 5481, Jan. 19, 2001.

#### § 30.51 Procedures for measurement of bulk spirits.

Where the quantity of spirits (including denatured spirits) in bulk is to be determined by volume as authorized by this chapter, the measurement shall be made in tanks, by meters as provided in 27 CFR part 19, or by other devices or methods authorized by the appropriate TTB officer, or as otherwise provided in this chapter, or such measurement may be made in tank cars or tank trucks if calibration charts for such conveyances are provided and such charts have been accurately prepared, and certified as accurate, by engineers or other persons qualified to calibrate such conveyances. Volumetric measurements in tanks shall be made only in accurately calibrated tanks equipped with suitable measuring devices, whereby the actual contents can be correctly ascertained. If the temperature of spirits (including denatured spirits) is other than the standard of 60 degrees Fahrenheit, gallonage determined by volumetric measurements shall be corrected to the standard temperature by means of table 7. In the case of denatured spirits, the temperature-correction factor for the proof of the spirits used in denaturation will give sufficiently accurate results, except that the temperature-correction factor used for specially denatured spirits, Formula No. 18, should be that given in table 7 for 100 proof spirits. When the quantity of spirits, in wine gallons, has been determined by volumetric measurement, the number of proof gallons shall be obtained by multiplying the wine gallons by the proof of the spirits as determined under § 30.31.

# Example.

Gauge glass reading inches—88.

Wine gallons per inch—48.96.

Temperature °F—72.

Proof of spirits—86.8.

Temperature correction factor (Table 7)—0.995.

48.96 W.G. × 88 = 4308.48 wine gallons.

4308.48 W.G. × 0.995 = 4286.94 wine gallons.

4286.94 W.G. × 0.868 = 3721.06392 = 3721.1 proof gallons.

(Sec. 201, Pub. L. 85-859, 72 Stat. 1358, as amended (26 U.S.C. 5204))

[T.D. ATF-198, 50 FR 8535, Mar. 1, 1985, as amended by T.D. ATF-381, 61 FR 37004, July 16, 1996]
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

BRIGHT HARRY; RONALD STEPHEN DRAPER,

Plaintiffs

- Appellants,

v.
KCG AMERICAS LLC; et al.,

Defendants

- Appellees. No. 21

- 16258

D.C. No. 4:20

- cv
- 07352

- HSG

MEMORANDUM *

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of California Haywood S. Gilliam, Jr., District Judge, Presiding

Submitted March 16, 2022 * *

Before: SILVERMAN, MILLER, and BUMATAY, Circuit Judges.
Bright Harry and Ronald Stephen Draper appeal pro se from the district

court’s judgment dismissing their action, declaring them vexatious litigant s , and
entering a pre

- filing review order against them

. We have jurisdiction under 28
U.S.C. § 1291. We review de novo a dismiss al under Federal Rule of Civil

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36

- 3.

** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). 

# FILED

MAR 24 2022

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK U.S. COURT OF APPEALS2 21

- 16258

Procedure 12(b)(6). Hebbe v. Pliler , 627 F.3d 338, 341 (9th Cir. 2010). We

affirm.

The distric t court properly dismissed Harry’s claims as barred by issue
preclusion and Draper’s claims as barred by claim preclusion because the issues
raised by Harry and Draper were adjudicated in a previous litigation against the
same parties (or those in privity to the parties)

. See Janjua v. Neufeld , 933 F.3d
1061, 1065 (9th Cir. 2019) (setting forth the elements of issue preclusion ; holding

that issue preclusion bars the relitigation of issues actually adjudicated in previous
litigation); Owens v. Kaiser Found. Health Plan, Inc. , 244 F.3d 708, 713 (9th Cir.
2001) (setting forth elements of claim preclusion )

. The district court did not abuse its discretion by declaring plaintiffs
vexatious litigant s and entering a pre

- filing review order ag ainst them because all
of the requirements were met. See Ringgold

- Lockhart v. C

ounty of Los Angeles , 761 F.3d 1057, 1062 (9th Cir. 2014) (setting forth standard of review and
requirements for pre

- filing review orders).

The district court did not abuse its discretion by denying plaintiff s ’ motion
to recuse District Judge Gilliam because plaintiffs failed to demonstrate that a reasonable person would believe Judge Gilliam’s impartiality could be questioned

.
See United States v. Hernandez , 109 F.3d 1450, 1453 (9th Cir. 1997) (setting forth
standard of review and discussing standard for recusal under 28 U.S.C. §§ 144 and3 21

- 16258

455 ).
We reject as without merit plaintiffs’ contention s that Judge Gilliam and
Judge Tigar behaved improperly

.
We do not consider m atters not specifically and distinctly raised and argued
in the opening brief

. See Padgett v. Wright , 587 F.3d 983, 985 n.2 (9th Cir. 2009)

.
Plaintiffs ’ motion to amend their excerpts of record (Docket Entry No. 34) is
granted. All other pending request s are denied.

AFFIRMED.
### Part G—Ready To Learn Television
Exhibit 10.36


 





Loan Agreement


 


Agreement no.:001


 


Party
A:Beijing Zhongtulian Culture & Education Development Centre


 


Party B:Jianlian Li


 


ID Card no.:441227197103107528


 


		一、	Terms Agreed



		1.	Party
                                         A obtains a loan of RMB10,000,000 from Party B for one year for Party A’s
                                         business development.



		2.	Party
                                         B agrees to offer the above mentioned amount of loan to Party A, and to transfer the
                                         amount of loan to the following account designated by Party A within five days from the
                                         date of signature of this agreement.



 


Bank
name:Beijing Shilihe Sub-branch, Industrial and Commercial Bank of China


 


Account
name: Beijing Zhongtulian Culture & Education Development Centre


 


Account no.:0200049419200119632


 


		3.	Party
                                         A promises to repay the above mentioned amount of loan with corresponding interest to
                                         Party B in one year from the date of signature of this agreement. The annual interest
                                         rate of loan under this agreement is 10%.



		4.	Party
                                         A will not pay the interest to Party B in the event of repayment in advance by Party
                                         B before the expiration date of this agreement.



		二、	Term of validity



 


This agreement will come into
effect upon signature by both Parties, and is valid for one year.


 


		三、	Documentations



 


This agreement
is done in duplicate, and each Party holds one.


 


		四、	Governing laws
                                         and dispute settlement



 


This
agreement is subject to the laws of People’s Republic of
China, and any disputes relating to this agreement can be submitted by any Party to South China International Economic and Trade
Arbitration Commission for arbitration according to its rules of arbitration.


 





 



    	 



    	 



    

 


Agreement
Signature Page


 





Party
A:Beijing Zhongtulian Culture & Education Development Centre


 


Representative
signature & Stamp: /s/ Ren Xiaoheng


 


Date:


 


 


 


 


 


Party
B:Jianlian Li


 


Signature
& Stamp:/s/ Jianlian Li


 


Date:January
6, 2014


 


 


 


This
is to confirm the extension of the maturity date of the RMB10 million loaned to Beijing Zhongtulian Culture and Education Development
Center to December 31, 2015. Other terms of the original agreement remains effective until the loan was paid off.


 


兹证明本人借给北京中图联文化教育开发中心的1000万元人民币的到期日已延后至2015年12月31日。原合同内的其它条款不变。


 


债权人:


 


/s/ Jinlian Li


Jinlian Li 李金莲


2014. 12. 31
T hi s di s pos i t i on i s notappr opr i a t e f orpubl i c a t i on and i s notpr e c e de nt * e xc e pta s pr ovi de d by 9th C i r . R . 36- 3.

T he pa ne l una ni m ous l yc onc l ude s thi s c a s e i s s ui t abl e f orde c i s i on ** w ith o u t o r a l a r g u m e n t. See F ed. R . A pp . P . 34 (a )( 2). G T / R es ear ch NOT F OR P UB L I CAT I ON

UN I TE D STATE S C OU RT OF APPE ALS FOR T HE NI NTH CI RC UI T UN I T E D S T AT E S OF AME R I C A, P l ai nt i ff

- A pp el l ee , v. TI M OTHY BR UCE R UD DLE, D e f

e n d a n t - A p p e lla n t. N o. 09- 30189 D. C. No . 4 : 0 8 - c r - 0 0 1 4 1 - SE H ME MOR AN DU M *

A pp ea l fr om the U ni t ed S t at es D i stri ctC ou rt f orthe D i s tr i c tof

M ont a na S a m E . H a ddon, D i s tr i c tJ udge , P r e s i di ng S ubm i tt e d M a r c h 16, 2010 ** B e f o r e : S C H R O E D E R , P R E G E R S O N , a n d R A W L I N S O N , C ir c u it J u d g e s . T i m othy B ruce R ud dl e app ea l s f rom hi s 210 -m on th sent ence i m po se d f ol l ow i ng agui l ty - pl e ac onvi c t i on f orr e c e i ptof

c hi l d pornogr aphy , i n vi ol a t i on of



# FI LED MA R 29 2010 M OLLY C. DW Y ER, CLERK U . S. C O U R T OF APPE ALSG T / Res ea r ch 09- 30189 2 18 U . S . C . § 2252A ( a ) ( 2) . W e ha ve j ur i s di c t i on pur s ua ntt o 28 U . S . C . § 1291, a nd w e a f f irm . R uddl e c ont e nds tha tthe di s tr i c tc ourtpr oc e dur a l l ye rr e d byf a i l i ng a de qua t e l y t o e xpl a i n the s e nt e nc e i m pos e d a nd tha tthe s e nt e nc e , a tthe hi gh- e nd o f th e S e n te n c in g G u id e lin e s , is s u b s ta n tiv e lyu n r e a s o n ab le . T h e r e c o r d r e f le c ts thatthe di stri ctcourtadequat el y e xp l ai ned the se nt ence . See U ni ted Stat es v. P er ez -P er ez , 5 1 2 F .3 d 5 1 4 , 5 1 6 - 1 7 ( 9 th C ir . 2 0 0 8 ) . F u rth e r , in lig h t o f th e to ta lity of the ci rc um st ance s and the fa ct ors s etforth i n 1 8 U . S . C . § 3 55 3(a) , the se nt ence is n o t u n r e a s o n ab le . See G a ll v. U ni ted Stat es , 55 2 U . S . 38 , 51 (200 7). AF F I RME D.
### §§102 to 104. Repealed. June 17, 1930, ch. 497, title IV, §651(a)(1), 46 Stat. 762

Section 102, act Sept. 21, 1922, ch. 356, title III, §318(a), 42 Stat. 948, related to conveyance of conversion and production cost information to the President and Congress. See section 1332(d) of this title.

Section 103, act Sept. 21, 1922, ch. 356, title III, §318(c), 42 Stat. 947, related to powers of the commission under title VII of the Revenue Act of 1916 and its power to require statements by importers and any American grower, producer, manufacturer, or seller as to their selling prices in the United States.

Section 104, act Sept. 21, 1922, ch. 356, title III, §318(b), 42 Stat. 947, defined the terms "article" and "import costs". See section 1332(e) of this title.
Editorial Note on Part 27
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 27 appear by T.D. ATF-474, 67 FR 11231, Mar. 13, 2002, and T.D. ATF-479, 67 FR 30799, May 8, 2002.

§ 27.182 Application and permit, Form 5150.33. ( a ) *General.* All permits previously issued to the United States or any of its Government agencies on Form 1444 shall remain valid and will be regulated by the same provisions of this subpart as it refers to permits on Form 5150.33.
( b ) *Application.* ( 1 ) A Government agency of the United States must apply for a permit to procure and withdraw spirits free of tax on Form 5150.33. Upon approval by the appropriate TTB officer, Form 5150.33 will be returned to the agency.
( 2 ) If a Government agency intends to withdraw spirits free of tax under this part and part 22 of this chapter, Form 5150.33 may be annotated to cover both types of withdrawals.
( 3 ) A separate permit is not required for each port of entry. The application, Form 5150.33, may be completed to indicate the applicable ports of entry in which spirits will be withdrawn from customs custody.
( 4 ) A Government agency may specify on its application that it desires a single permit authorizing all sub-agencies under its control to procure and withdraw spirits free of tax under this subpart and subpart N of part 22 of this chapter; or, each Government location may individually file an application for a permit, Form 5150.33.
( 5 ) Each application for a permit shall be signed by the head of the agency or sub-agency, or the incumbent of an office which is authorized by the head of the agency or sub-agency, to sign. Evidence of authorization to sign on behalf of the head of an agency or sub-agency shall be furnished with the application.
( c ) *Use of spirits.* Spirits withdrawn under this subpart may not be used for non-Government purposes.
( d ) *Cancellation of permit.* All permits on Form 5150.33 and previous editions on Form 1444 remain in force until surrendered or canceled. Upon surrender or cancellation, the Government agency must obtain and destroy all photocopies of the permit furnished to port directors of customs, and forward the original to the appropriate TTB officer for cancellation.
(Sec. 201, Pub. L. 85-859, 72 Stat. 1375, as amended (26 U.S.C. 5313))
[50 FR 9200, Mar. 6, 1985, as amended by T.D. ATF-474, 67 FR 11232, Mar. 13, 2002]
EXHIBIT 21
 CRYOPORT, INC.
Subsidiaries of Registrant
### **CHAPTER 12—FOREIGN AND EXCHANGE STUDENTS**

Sec.
221.
Instructions of citizens from American republics; Government maintained professional educational institutions.
221a.
Instructions of citizens from American republics; United States Military Academy; restrictions; saving provision.
222 to 224. Repealed.
225.
Fund for education of Iranian students in United States.
226.
Cooperative public and private sector program for providing scholarships to students from the Caribbean and Central America.
### §1656. Prohibition against official or court orders to achieve racial balance or insure compliance with constitutional standards applicable to entire United States

The proviso of section 407(a) of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 [42 U.S.C. 2000c–6(a)] providing in substance that no court or official of the United States shall be empowered to issue any order seeking to achieve a racial balance in any school by requiring the transportation of pupils or students from one school to another or one school district to another in order to achieve such racial balance, or otherwise enlarge the existing power of the court to insure compliance with constitutional standards shall apply to all public school pupils and to every public school system, public school and public school board, as defined by title IV [42 U.S.C. 2000c et seq.], under all circumstances and conditions and at all times in every State, district, territory, Commonwealth, or possession of the United States regardless of whether the residence of such public school pupils or the principal offices of such public school system, public school or public school board is situated in the northern, eastern, western, or southern part of the United States.

(Pub. L. 92–318, title VIII, §806, June 23, 1972, 86 Stat. 373.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

The Civil Rights Act of 1964, referred to in text, is Pub. L. 88–352, July 2, 1964, 78 Stat. 241. Title IV of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 is classified generally to subchapter IV (§2000c et seq.) of chapter 21 of Title 42, The Public Health and Welfare. For complete classification of this Act to the Code, see Short Title note set out under section 2000a of Title 42 and Tables.
### §4732. Detail of personnel to Office of the United States Trade Representative

#### (a) In general

Upon the request of the Trade Representative, the Administrator of the Environmental Protection Agency, the Director of the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, and the Administrator of the National Oceanic Atmospheric 1 Administration may detail, on a reimbursable basis, one employee of each such respective agency to the Office of the United States Trade Representative to be assigned to the United States Embassy in Mexico to carry out the duties described in subsection (b).

#### (b) Duties

The duties described in this subsection are the following:

(1) Assist the Interagency Environment Committee to carry out monitoring and enforcement actions with respect to the environmental obligations of Mexico.

(2) Prepare and submit to the Interagency Environment Committee on a quarterly basis a report on efforts of Mexico to comply with its environmental obligations.

(Pub. L. 116–113, title VIII, §822, Jan. 29, 2020, 134 Stat. 96.)

1 So in original. Probably should be preceded by "and".
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Salvatore Zaccaria, Appellant.

Judgment affirmed. Ho opinion. Present — Ingraham, P. J., McLaughlin, Laughlin, Scott and Hotchkiss, JJ.
No. 12,161.

#### McDonald *v.*Thibault.

Decided October 15, 1928.

Mr. Robert H. Schaper, for plaintiff in error.

Mr. John G. Beid, Mr. J. P. Deathebage, for defendant in error.

*Department One.*

Mr. Justice Waliieb

delivered the opinion of the court.

The trial court rendered judgment against the plaintiff in error, for $262.50, for services rendered to her by-defendant in error, in connection with the sale of a hotel business. The judgment appears to have been arrived at upon a quantum meruit. The count in the complaint upon which the judgment was based was substantially as follows: That the defendants are indebted to the plaintiff in the sum of $525, on an account for services ren*471dered by the plaintiff as a broker, in securing a purchaser for a hotel and restaurant business, fixtures, equipment, and other personal property, belonging to the defendants, which services were performed at the request of the defendants, in Lincoln county, Colorado, between October, 1926, and February, 1927; and that the defendants have not paid the same nor any part thereof. A general demurrer to this count was overruled, and error is assigned to this, as well as other rulings.

We find in the record no evidence of the reasonable value of the services rendered by the plaintiff, but at all events, the judgment must be reversed because of the error of the court in overruling the demurrer.

Disregarding its conclusions of law, the count in question alleged the performance of services by the plaintiff at defendant’s request. This would be sufficient to raise an implied promise to pay. *Leitensdorfer v. King, Adm.,*7 Colo. 436, 4 Pac. 37, 5 Pac. 816; *Campbell v. Shiland,*14 Colo. 491, 23 Pac. 324. But the demurrer should have been sustained because of the omission of the pleader to allege either an agreed price, or the reasonable value of the services. See 26 Stand. Ency. Proc. 529; *Murphy v. Taylor,*173 Pa. St. 317, 33 Atl. 1041; 22 Ency. Pl. & Prac. 1369.

The judgment is reversed and cause remanded, with instructions to permit the plaintiff to amend his complaint as he may be advised. '

Me. Chibe Justice Denison, Me. Justice Butt.ee, sitting for Me. Justice Bueke, and Me. Justice Campbell, sitting for Me. Justice Whiteoed, concur.
#### Mary Laventhall et al., Respondents, v. Fireman’s Insurance Company of Newark, New Jersey, et al., Appellants.

Hagarty, Carswell, Johnston, Adel and Lewis, JJ., concur.