alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32





SECTION 1350 CERTIFICATION





Each of the undersigned, S.W. Yong, President and Chief Executive Officer of Trio-Tech International, a California corporation (the “Company”), and Victor H.M. Ting, Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, do hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of his knowledge (1) the quarterly report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the three months ended September 30, 2012, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and (2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.








/s/ S. W. Yong


Name:  S. W. Yong


Title:  President and Chief Executive Officer


Dated:  November 19, 2012








/s/  Victor H.M. Ting


Name:  Victor H.M. Ting


Title:  Vice President and Chief Financial Officer


Dated:  November 19, 2012








A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
### §§1961 to 1963. Repealed. Pub. L. 93–618, title VI, §602(e), Jan. 3, 1975, 88 Stat. 2072

Section 1961, Pub. L. 87–794, title III, §328, Oct. 11, 1962, 76 Stat. 895, provided for application for a relocation allowance. See sections 2297 and 2298 of this title.

Section 1962, Pub. L. 87–794, title III, §329, Oct. 11, 1962, 76 Stat. 895, set out qualifying requirements for training. See sections 2297 and 2298 of this title.

Section 1963, Pub. L. 87–794, title III, §330, Oct. 11, 1962, 76 Stat. 896, defined "relocation allowance". See sections 2297 and 2298 of this title.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date of Repeal

Repeal effective on 90th day following Jan. 3, 1975, see note set out under section 1901 of this title.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY

 13,374

 12,885

 12,146

 11,421

 10,699

 9,960

 8,974

 8,306

 7,786

 7,486

 7,348

 7,659

 8,105

 8,676

 9,400

 10,103

 10,868

 11,629

 12,661

 13,415

 13,722

 13,635

 13,472

 13,477

 13,583

 14,101

 14,660

 14,925

 14,686

 14,746

 14,397

 33,748

 34,226

 34,879

 35,575

 36,357

 37,109

 38,022

 38,651

 39,097

 39,231

 39,308

 38,953

 38,605

 38,354

 38,170

 37,773

 37,159

 36,574

 36,091

 35,921

 35,705

 35,936

 36,332

 36,589

 36,902

 37,003

 37,306

 37,865

 38,779

 39,359

 40,161

STORAGE - A.F. 

 47,122

 47,111

 47,025

 46,996

 47,056

 47,069

 46,996

 46,957

 46,883

 46,717

 46,656

 46,612

 46,710

 47,030

 47,570

 47,876

 48,027

 48,203

 48,752

 49,336

 49,427

 49,571

 49,804

 50,066

 50,485

 51,104

 51,966

 52,790

 53,465

 54,105

 54,558

2,750

1,807

2,089

1,754

3,067

2,323

2,186

2,587

2,143

2,120

1,652

1,526

2,212

2,104

1,966

2,123

2,044

2,300

2,103

2,091

2,026

1,892

1,749

2,224

1,953

2,179

2,138

2,384

2,327

2,387

1,939

2,719

1,801

2,046

1,739

3,097

2,330

2,149

2,567

2,106

2,036

1,621

1,504

2,261

2,265

2,238

2,277

2,120

2,389

2,380

2,385

2,072

1,965

1,866

2,356

2,164

2,491

2,573

2,799

2,667

2,710

2,167

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

MARCH 2000 FULL NATURAL FLOW AT NEW MELONES DAM RUN DATE: 04/24/2000

TOTALS +7,374 69,860

* October 1, 138,567

 310.5

 314.0

 318.1

 321.5

 327.7

 332.3

 336.6

 341.7

 345.8

 349.9

 353.1

 356.1

 360.6

 365.1

 369.5

 374.0

 378.2

 383.0

 387.7

 392.4

 396.5

 400.4

 404.1

 408.8

 413.1

 418.0

 423.1

 428.7

 434.0

 439.3

 443.6

DONNELLS

RES

BEARDSLEY

RES

1999 TO DATE

NEW

MELONES

INFLOW

C.F.S

NATURAL

RIVER

C.F.S

ACCUM *

FULL

NATURAL

1000 A.F.

RESERVOIR

TOTAL

-62

-11

-86

-29

+60

+13

-73

-39

-74

-166

-61

-44

+98

+320

+540

+306

+151

+176

+549

+584

+91

+144

+233

+262

+419

+619

+862

+824

+675

+640

+453

CHANGE

A.F. C.F.S.

-31

-6

-43

-15

+30

+7

-37

-20

-37

-84

-31

-22

+49

+161

+272

+154

+76

+89

+277

+294

+46

+73

+117

+132

+211

+312

+435

+415

+340

+323

+228
###### Editorial Note on Part 46

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 46 appear by T.D. ATF-457, 66 FR 32220, 32221, June 14, 2001.

#### § 46.103 Time for filing return and paying tax.

The return, along with remittance of special tax, must be filed on or before the date of commencing business as a manufacturer of tobacco products, manufacturer of cigarette papers or tubes, or export warehouse proprietor, and thereafter every year on or before July 1. If the return and applicable tax are received in the mail and the U.S. postmark on the cover shows that it was deposited in the mail in the United States within the time prescribed for filing in an envelope or other appropriate wrapper which was properly addressed with postage prepaid, the return will be considered as timely filed. If the postmark is not legible, the sender has the burden of proving the date when the postmark was made. When registered mail is used, the date of registration will be accepted as the postmark date. When certified mail is used, the date of the postmark on the sender's receipt of certified mail is treated as the postmark date.

(26 U.S.C. 5732, 6011, 6071)
### §2608. Temporary disposition of materials and articles subject to this chapter

Pending a final determination as to whether any archaeological or ethnological material, or any article of cultural property, has been imported into the United States in violation of section 2606 of this title or section 2607 of this title, the Secretary shall, upon application by any museum or other cultural or scientific institution in the United States which is open to the public, permit such material or article to be retained at such institution if he finds that—

(1) sufficient safeguards will be taken by the institution for the protection of such material or article; and

(2) sufficient bond is posted by the institution to ensure its return to the Secretary.

(Pub. L. 97–446, title III, §309, Jan. 12, 1983, 96 Stat. 2360.)

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date

Section effective on the 90th day after Jan. 12, 1983, or on any date which the President shall prescribe and publish in the Federal Register, with exceptions, see section 315 of Pub. L. 97–446, set out as a note under section 2601 of this title.
Exhibit 31.2I, Victor H.M. Ting, certify that:1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Trio-Tech International, a Californiacorporation;2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact oromit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstancesunder which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by thisreport;3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included inthis report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operationsand cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;4. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:     (a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls andprocedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating tothe registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within thoseentities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;     (b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures andpresented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls andprocedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and     (c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourthfiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonablylikely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and5. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the auditcommittee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):     (a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation ofinternal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect theregistrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and     (b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have asignificant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.Dated: May 11, 2006                                                 /s/ VICTOR H.M. TING   Victor H.M. Ting, Chief Financial Officer   and Vice President (Principal Financial Officer)
(No. 74-CC-438

#### Forrest N. Jones, Claimant, *vs.*State of Illinois, Department of Transportation, Respondent.

*Opinion filed April 2, 1974.*

Forrest N. Jones, Claimant, pro se.

William J. Scott, Attorney General; William E. Webber, Assistant Attorney General, for Respondent.

Per Curiam.
###### Editorial Note on Part 44

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 44 appear by T.D. ATF-464, 66 FR 43480, Aug. 20, 2001, and T.D. ATF-480, 67 FR 30801-30803, May 8, 2002.

#### § 44.192 To vessels and aircraft for shipment to noncontiguous foreign countries and possessions of the United States.

Where tobacco products, and cigarette papers and tubes are removed from a factory or an export warehouse, for direct delivery to a vessel or aircraft for transportation to a noncontiguous foreign country, Puerto Rico, the Virgin Islands, or a possession of the United States, the manufacturer or export warehouse proprietor shall consign the shipment directly to the vessel or aircraft, or to his agent at the port for delivery to the vessel or aircraft.

(72 Stat. 1418, as amended; 26 U.S.C. 5704)

[T.D. 6871, 31 FR 52, Jan. 4, 1966. Redesignated at 40 FR 16835, Apr. 15, 1975, and amended by T.D. ATF-232, 51 FR 28088, Aug. 5, 1986; T.D. ATF-243, 51 FR 43194, Dec. 1, 1986]
-84 -82 -80 -78 -76 -74

36 38 40 

### ★ ▲ ▲ ▲ ▲



### ★ ▲ ▲ ▲ ▲ 500 1000 1500 500 18 12 06 00 06/22 

### NOAA HYSPLIT MODEL 

## Backward trajectory ending at 2300 UTC 22 Jun 06

EDAS Meteorological DataSource★at 38.77 N 77.11 WMeters AGL
###### Editorial Note on Part 28

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 28 appear by T.D. ATF-477, 67 FR 18087 through 18090, Apr. 15, 2002.

#### § 28.61 Bond, Form 5100.25

If a specific lot of distilled spirits or wine is to be withdrawn without payment of tax, as authorized in § 28.91(a)(1), (2), (3), (5), or § 28.121(a), (b), (c), or (d), by a person other than the proprietor of the bonded premises, a specific bond on TTB Form 5100.25 shall be filed by the exporter, as provided in § 28.51. The penal sum of the bond shall not be less than the tax prescribed by law on the quantity of spirits or wine to be withdrawn. However, the maximum penal sum of the bond shall not exceed $200,000 but in no case shall the penal sum be less than $1,000.

(Sec. 201, Pub. L. 85-859, 72 Stat. 1352, as amended, 1362, as amended, 1380, as amended, 1381, 1382 (26 U.S.C. 5175, 5214, 5362) sec. 3. Pub. L. 91-659, 84 Stat. 1965, as amended (26 U.S.C. 5066, 5370, 5371))

[T.D. ATF-88, 46 FR 39815, Aug. 5, 1981, as amended by T.D. TTB-8, 69 FR 3832, Jan. 27, 2004; T.D. TTB-146, 82 FR 1134, Jan. 4, 2017]
January 2024

STORAGE COMPUTED* RELEASE - C.F.S. EVAP

ACRE-FEET INFLOW FOLSOM C. F. S.

DAY ELEV IN LAKE CHANGE C.F.S. SOUTH POWER SPILL HATCHERY (1)

8,007

1 123.04 7,810 -197 1,886 0 1,874 0 110 1

2 122.53 7,580 -230 1,828 0 614 1,230 100 0

3 122.67 7,643 63 2,052 0 10 1,900 110 0

4 122.41 7,526 -117 1,930 7 10 1,862 110 0

5 122.34 7,494 -32 1,764 10 719 942 109 0

6 123.06 7,819 325 1,902 10 1,618 0 110 0

7 122.91 7,751 -68 1,710 10 1,624 0 110 0

8 122.40 7,521 -230 1,621 10 1,617 0 110 0

9 122.67 7,643 122 1,797 4 1,621 0 110 0

10 122.79 7,697 54 1,757 0 1,620 0 110 0

11 122.68 7,647 -50 1,719 0 1,634 0 110 0

12 123.00 7,791 144 1,844 7 1,654 0 110 0

13 123.02 7,800 9 1,787 10 1,662 0 110 0

14 123.32 7,941 141 1,851 10 1,660 0 110 0

15 123.15 7,862 -79 1,793 10 1,713 0 110 0

16 123.41 7,984 122 1,849 10 1,667 0 110 0

17 123.29 7,927 -57 1,760 10 1,669 0 110 0

18 122.84 7,719 -208 1,685 10 1,670 0 110 0

19 122.50 7,566 -153 1,714 10 1,671 0 110 0

20 122.64 7,629 63 1,822 10 1,670 0 110 0

21 122.27 7,463 -166 1,712 10 1,676 0 110 0

22 121.66 7,198 -265 1,650 3 1,671 0 110 0

23 122.91 7,751 553 2,058 0 1,669 0 110 0

24 123.25 7,909 158 1,856 0 1,666 0 110 0

25 122.96 7,773 -136 1,713 0 1,672 0 110 0

26 122.81 7,706 -67 1,742 6 1,672 0 98 0

27 122.60 7,611 -95 1,719 10 1,666 0 91 0

28 122.73 7,670 59 1,797 10 1,666 0 91 0

29 122.82 7,710 40 1,790 10 1,668 0 91 1

30 122.95 7,769 59 1,773 3 1,648 0 91 1

31 122.67 7,643 -126 1,673 0 1,645 0 91 1

TOTALS -364 55,554 190 46,316 5,934 3,292 4

ACRE-FEET -364 110,191 377 91,868 11,770 6,530 8

*COMPUTED INFLOW IS SUM OF CHANGE IN STORAGE, RELEASES, AND EVAPORATION.

(1) EVAPORATION RECORDS TAKEN FROM FOLSOM PAN.

SUMMARY 

Release (ACRE-FEET)

Power 91,868 Folsom South Canal 377

Spill 11,770 Hatchery 6,530

Total = 110,545

Historical Archive and Report Database

Lake Natoma Daily Operations

Run Date: 2/10/2024
#### Sixty Wall Street v. Joseph R. Clevenger.

Application granted. Order signed. Present—Ingraham, P. J., McLaughlin, Laughlm, Clarke and Scott, JJ.
#### John Victor Clarke and Copley Clarke, Respondents, v. Lucile C. Becker, Individually and as Administratrix, etc., and Others, Appellants, Impleaded with Edward J. Lewis, Respondent.

(No. 1.)

Order affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements. All concurred.
Brick and Structural Clay Products NESHAP – Confidential Business Information 

Documents

This list of files is provided as a reference only. The information contained in these files is 

Confidential Business Information and may not be viewed by anyone without specific clearance 

under the Clean Air Act.

2008 Section 114 Survey Response: ACME Brick Company, Ft Worth, TX. Dated 8/12/2008, 2 

pages.

2008 Section 114 Survey Response: Hanson Brick, Columbia, SC. Dated 8/12/2008, 7 pages.

2008 Section 114 Survey Response: General Shale Brick, Inc., Johnson City, TN. Dated 8/12/08, 

4 pages and 1 CD.

2008 Section 114 Survey Response: Carolina Ceramics, LLC, Columbia, SC. Dated 8/12/08, 2 

pages and 1 CD.

2008 Section 114 Survey Response: Boral, Roswell, GA. Dated 8/13/08, 1 page (Form F 

Economics Information).

2008 Section 114 Survey Response: Belden Brick Co., Canton, OH. Dated 8/15/08, 1 page 

(Form F Economics Information).

2008 Section 114 Survey Response: Glen-Gery Corp., Shoemakersville, PA. Dated 8/13/08, 1 

page (Form F Economics Information). 

2008 Section 114 Survey Response: Morin Brick Co., Auburn, ME. Dated 8/13/08, 2 pages 

(Form F Economics Information and Letter). 

Characterization of Dioxin Emissions from Sources that Use Ball Clays - Emission Test Report: 

Unimin Corporation, Gleason, TN. Dated 3/17/2010, 296 pages.

Brick & Structural Clay Products - Economic Impacts Data: (a) Columbus Brick Company; (b) 

Bowerston Shale Company; (c) Summit Brick & Tile; (d) Watsontown Brick Company; (e) 

Whitacre Greer; (f) Pine Hall Brick; (g) Ironrock; (h) Lakewood Brick & Tile Company; (i) 

Richards Brick Company; (j) McAvoy Brick; (k) Continental Brick Company; (l) Endicott Clay 

Products Company; (m) Henry Brick Company; (n) Statesville Brick Company; (o) Cherokee 

Brick & Tile Company; (p) Elgin/Butler Company; (q) Mutual Materials; (r) Marion Ceramics; 

(s) McNear Brick & Block. 8/2013.
No. 12,104.

#### Investors Finance Company *v.*Luxford, et al.

Decided October 29, 1928.

Mr. Henry Howard, for plaintiff in error.

Mr. William Dillon, Mr. J. M. Taylor, for defendants in error.

*Department Two.*

Mr. Chief Justice Denison

delivered the opinion of the court.

The district court sustained a demurrer to an alternative writ of prohibition, addressed to the county court; the plaintiff, the Investors Finance Company, elected to stand and judgment was rendered for the respondent. We think the judgment was right.

*520The substantial facts, as shown by the writ, are that in 1922, the Finance Company obtained a judgment against one Kroll on a cognovit note without service on or notice to him. His attorney was in correspondence with the company, had set forth his client’s claims of defense and was led by them to believe that they acquiesced in those claims and he so reported to the client, yet during this correspondence they took the judgment. This amounted to fraud in procuring the judgment. Similar cases are *Perkins v. Cooper,*28 Vt. 729, where judgment was taken after negotiations from which defendant understood that the suit would be discontinued; *Eddy v. Cochran,*1 Aiken (Vt.) 359, where judgment was taken after an agreement to arbitrate; *Kimball v. Randall,*56 Vt. 558, which held that the fraud need not be intentional.

In 1927 execution was issued and Kroll then had his first notice of the judgment. He immediately moved to set it aside and the county court so ordered, whereupon this proceeding for prohibition was begun in the district court.

Since there was fraud in procuring the judgment it might be set aside by audita querela (6 C. J. 854), or, under some circumstances, in equity *(San Juan etc., Co. v. Finch,*6 Colo. 214; *Jotter v. Marvin,*63 Colo. 222, 165 Pac. 269; *People v. District Court,*76 Colo. 169, 229 Pac. 1113; see also *McClellan v. Morris, 71*Colo. 304, 313, 206 Pac. 575), or under section 81, Code 1921, by motion

within one year, if there was no service of summons. Since audita querela, eo nomine, and bills in equity have been abolished by section 1 of the Code, we see no reason why the proceeding by motion should not be substituted therefor and it was so held in *Jotter v. Marvin, supra.*In most states this is done. 6 C. J. 851.

It is claimed that the county court lost jurisdiction after one year, but the remedies of audita querela or bill in equity to cancel a judgment on the ground of fraud in procuring it were never restricted by such a limitation. *People v. District Court, supra.*

*521It is claimed that under our rules prohibition will not lie on the f acts in this case, but we do not find it necessary to decide the point.

The judgment is affirmed.

Me. Justice Campbell, Me. Justice Butlee and Mr. Justice Adams concur.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
COMPANY'S FINANCIAL STATEMENTS ON FORM 10-K AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY
REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1996
<CASH>                                          16,274
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   38,581
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                    100,527
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               184,080
<PP&E>                                         226,508
<DEPRECIATION>                                 129,387
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 431,047
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          166,538
<BONDS>                                         97,934
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           720
<OTHER-SE>                                     165,854
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   431,047
<SALES>                                      1,014,705
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             1,014,705
<CGS>                                          625,697
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  625,697
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               347,822
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               9,918
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 33,262
<INCOME-TAX>                                    12,641
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             20,620
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    20,620
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0


</TABLE>