alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 10 (Friday, January 14, 2011)]
[Notices]
[Pages 2727-2728]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2011-864]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

RAILROAD RETIREMENT BOARD


Sunshine Act; Notice of Public Meeting

    Notice is hereby given that the Railroad Retirement Board will hold 
a

[[Page 2728]]

meeting on January 19, 2011, 10 a.m. at the Board's meeting room on the 
8th floor of its headquarters building, 844 North Rush Street, Chicago, 
Illinois, 60611. The agenda for this meeting follows:
(1) Executive Committee Reports
    The entire meeting will be open to the public. The person to 
contact for more information is Beatrice Ezerski, Secretary to the 
Board, Phone No. 312-751-4920.

    Dated: January 10, 2011.
Beatrice Ezerski,
Secretary to the Board.
[FR Doc. 2011-864 Filed 1-12-11; 11:15 am]
BILLING CODE 7905-01-P
# Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

July 21, 2015

N o. 04

- 14

- 00758

- CV

John A . LANCE , Debra L. Lance, F.D. Franks and Helen Franks,

Appellant s

v.

Judith and Terry ROBINSON , Gary and Brenda Fest, Virginia Gray and Butch Townsend,

Appellee s

From the 198th Judicial District Court, Bandera County, Texas

Trial Court No. CV

- 12

- 010020 9

Honorable M. Rex Emerson, Judge Presiding



### O R D E R

Appellees Judith and Terry Robinson, Gary and Brenda Fest, Virginia Gray, and Butch

Townsend’s unopposed motion for extension of time to file their brief is GRANTED.

Appellee’s brief is timely filed as of Jul y 15, 2015.

_________________________________ Patricia O. Alvarez, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said

court on this 21st day of July, 2015

.

___________________________________ Keith E. Hottle

Clerk of Court
#### In the Matter of the Application of Scarsdale Company, Appellant, for an Order Directing the Payment by the County Treasurer of Westchester County of Money Deposited to Discharge a Certain Alleged Mechanic's Lien, Filed by Yerks & Company, Respondent.

(Appeal No. 2.)

Order affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements. No opinion. Jenks, P. J., Burr, Thomas, Stapleton and Putnam, JJ., concurred.
COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE

FIRST DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT HOUSTON

ORDER

Appellate case name: Darryl Dwayne Farley v. Doretha Lenett Edwards

Appellate case number: 01-20-00018-CV

Trial court case number: 2002-46326

Trial court: 245th District Court of Harris County

Appellant, Darryl Dwayne Farley, has filed a Statement of Inability to Afford Payment of 

Court Costs or an Appeal Bond. The Court abates this appeal for the trial court to hold a hearing 

to hear evidence and issue findings of fact to determine whether appellant is indigent. See TEX.

R. APP. P. 20.1(b)(3). The court coordinator of the trial court shall set a date for said hearing 

within 30 days of the date of this Order and notify the parties, including appellant. If appellant is 

now incarcerated, he may appear by closed video teleconference.1 The trial court shall have a 

court reporter, or court recorder, record the hearing and file the reporter’s record with this Court 

no later than 30 days from the date of the indigency hearing. The trial court clerk shall file a 

clerk’s record containing the trial court’s findings no later than 30 days from the date of the 

indigency hearing.

The appeal is abated, treated as a closed case, and removed from this Court’s active 

docket. The appeal will be reinstated on this Court’s active docket when the clerk’s record and 

reporter’s record of the hearing are filed with this Court.

It is so ORDERED.

Judge’s signature: ___________/s/ Russell Lloyd___________

Acting individually 

Date: January 23, 2020

 

1 Any such teleconference must use a closed-circuit video teleconferencing system that provides for a 

simultaneous compressed full motion video and interactive communication of image and sound between 

the trial court, appellant, and any attorneys representing the State or appellant. On request, appellant and 

his counsel shall be able to communicate privately without being recorded or heard by the trial court or the 

attorney representing the State.
## F IRST 

## D ISTRICT 

## C OURT OF 

## A PPEAL 

## S TATE OF 

## F LORIDA

_____________________________
No. 1D 20

- 3238

_____________________________ C ALVIN H OLIDAY ,
Petitioner
,

v.

S TATE OF F LORIDA , Respondent

.

_____________________________

Petition Alleging Ineffective Assistance of Appellant Counsel

— Original Jurisdiction

. September 30, 2021

P ER C URIAM

. The petition alleging ineffective assistance of appellate counsel is denied on the merits.

B.L. T HOMAS , R OBERTS , and L ONG , JJ., concur.

_____________________________ Not final until disposition of any timely and authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 9.331

.

_____________________________2 Calvin Holiday, pro se
, Petitioner

. Ashley Moody, Attorney General, and Heather Flanagan Ross, Assistant Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Respondent.
EXHIBIT 32.1
                                                                    ------------




             CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SS.1350, AS ADOPTED
              PURSUANT TO SS.906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


       In connection with the quarterly report of Spire Corporation (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q (the "Report") for the period ended June 30, 2008 as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, I, Roger
G. Little, Chairman of the Board, Chief Executive Officer and President of the
Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss.1350, as adopted pursuant to ss.906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

       1.  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

       2.  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.




Dated:   August 12, 2008            By: /s/ Roger G. Little
                                        -------------------------------------
                                        Roger G. Little
                                        Chairman of the Board, Chief Executive
                                        Officer and President


       A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or
other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the
signatures that appear in typed form within the electronic version of this
written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to the Company and
will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange
Commission or its staff upon request.
484 P.2d 350

#### STATE of New Mexico, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Robert Evans BONNEY, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 623.

Court of Appeals of New Mexico.

April 16, 1971.

James F. Warden, Carlsbad, for defendant-appellant.

David L. Norvell, Atty. Gen., Ray Shollenbarger, Sp. Asst. Atty. Gen., Santa Fe, for plaintiff-appellee.

OPINION

WOOD, Judge.

Defendant pled guilty to an attempt to* commit aggravated battery. Subsequently, he moved for post-conviction relief. Section 21-1-1(93), N.M.S.A.1953 (Repl.VoL 4). After an evidentiary hearing, the motion was denied. • Defendant’s appeal asserts error in denying his motion because: (1) defendant’s actions did not constitute an attempt to commit aggravated battery and (2) the State failed to establish that defendant had the specific intent to commit aggravated battery.

Both claims would be reviewable issues on an appeal after a trial. But that is not the posture of this case. Here, defendant seeks a review of evidence sufficient to sustain a conviction when there has been no trial and attempts to do so in a post-conviction proceeding.

 Defendant’s plea of guilty was a confession of guilt. State v. Daniels, 78 N.M. 768, 438 P.2d 512 (1968). The record in this case shows defendant acknowledged his guilt to the trial judge before his plea was accepted. The guilty plea waived trial. Since the plea waived trial, and there being no issue as to the voluntariness of that plea, defendant is bound by his plea. State v. Montoya, 81 N.M. 233, 465 P.2d 290 (Ct.App.1970). Thus, there simply is no question before us as to the sufficiency of the evidence.

Further, even if defendant had been found guilty after a trial, post-conviction proceedings are not a method for obtaining *509a retrial of his case. State v. Reid, *79*N.M. 213, 441 P.2d 742 (1968); State v. Williams, 78 N.M. 431, 432 P.2d 396 (1967). Thus, insufficiency of the evidence is not a basis for granting post-conviction relief. Herring v. State, 81 N.M. 21, 462 P.2d 468 (Ct.App.1969); State v. Gray, 80 N.M. 751, 461 P.2d 233 (Ct.App.1969); Nance v. State, 80 N.M. 123, 452 P.2d 192 (Ct.App.1969); State v. Gonzales, 79 N.M. 414, 444 P.2d 599 (Ct.App.1968).

The order denying relief is affirmed.

It is so ordered.

HENDLEY and SUTIN, JJ., concur.
##### 



EXHIBIT 23
PENNROCK FINANCIAL SERVICES CORP. CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements of PennRock Financial
Services Corp. on Form S-3 (No. 333-10568) and Form S-8 (No. 333-99797), and in the Registration
Statement of Community Banks, Inc. on Form S-4 (No. 333-123765) of our report dated March 29, 2005
with respect to PennRock Financial Services Corp. managements assessment of the effectiveness of
internal control over financial reporting and the effectiveness of internal control over financial
reporting, which report appears in this Amended Annual Report on Form 10-K of PennRock Financial
Services Corp. for the year ended December 31, 2004. /s/ CROWE CHIZEK AND COMPANY LLC
 Columbus, Ohio
April 8, 2005
Editorial Note on Part 447
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 447 appear by T.D. ATF-487, 68 FR 3748, Jan. 24, 2003.

§ 447.44 Permit denial, revocation or suspension. ( a ) Import permits under this subpart may be denied, revoked, suspended or revised without prior notice whenever the appropriate ATF officer finds the proposed importation to be inconsistent with the purpose or in violation of section 38, Arms Export Control Act of 1976 or the regulations in this part.
( b ) Whenever, after appropriate consideration, a permit application is denied or an outstanding permit is revoked, suspended, or revised, the applicant or permittee shall be promptly advised in writing of the appropriate ATF officer's decision and the reasons therefor.
( c ) Upon written request made within 30 days after receipt of an adverse decision, the applicant or permittee shall be accorded an opportunity to present additional information and to have a full review of his case by the appropriate ATF officer.
( d ) Unused, expired, suspended, or revoked permits must be returned immediately to the appropriate ATF officer.
[T.D. ATF-8, 39 FR 3251, Jan. 25, 1974, as amended by T.D. ATF-215, 50 FR 42161, Oct. 18, 1985]
#### § 31.234 Liability for special (occupational) tax.

The special (occupational) tax on alcohol beverage dealers was suspended for the period July 1, 2005, through June 30, 2008, and was repealed effective July 1, 2008. Dealers who were engaged in business prior to the suspension period remain liable for payment of the special (occupational) tax in accordance with the laws and regulations in effect at that time. The tax return to be used for payment of any past-due special (occupational) tax is TTB Form 5630.5a.

(Section 11125, Pub. L. 109-59, 119 Stat. 1953)
On December 14, 2012, the Department of Transportation participated on a telephone conference call with Congressman Pedro Pierluisi, Resident Commissioner of Puerto Rico. DOT participants included Secretary Ray La H ood, Chief of Staff Joan DeBoer, Assistant Secretary of Governmental Affairs Dana Gresham, Deputy Assistant Secretary of Governmental Affairs Amit Bose and Deputy General Counsel James Cole, Jr. Congressman Pierluisi discussed a January 11,
201 3 deadline for the concessionaire, waiver requests by the sponsor, the importance of maintaining service to Puerto Rico’s regional airports and the Puerto Rico Governor

- elect’s public statements in support of the privatization. Secretary LaHood suggested that Congre ssman Pierluisi set up a time to meet with FAA representatives to discuss his views
Status of State Plans for Hospital Medical Infectious Waste Incinerators

Update: 3/18/13

This document does not establish any new requirements and is not binding or enforceable. It does not constitute final agency action under Clean Air Act section 

307(b)(1), 42 U.S.C. 7607(b)(1). 

 

EPA 

Region

State/Local 

Agency

Status 

TBD

Draft State 

Plan 

Submitted

Final

State Plan 

Submitted

State Plan 

Approved

Negative 

Declaration 

Submitted or 

Approved 

Anticipated 

States to 

Submit 

Negative 

Declarations

Anticipated States 

to Accept 

Delegation of 

Federal Plan

Region 

1

Connecticut X

Maine X

Massachusetts X

New 

Hampshire

X

Rhode Island X

Vermont X

Region 

2

New Jersey X

New York X

Puerto Rico X

Virgin Islands X

Region 

3

District of 

Columbia

X

Delaware X

Maryland X

Pennsylvania

Philadelphia 

County

Allegheny 

County

X

X

X

Virginia X

West Virginia X

Region 

4

Alabama DEM

Huntsville

Jefferson 

County

(Birmingham)

X

X

X
 

EPA 

Region

State/Local 

Agency

Status 

TBD

Draft State 

Plan 

Submitted

Final

State Plan 

Submitted

State Plan 

Approved

Negative 

Declaration 

Submitted or 

Approved 

Anticipated 

States to 

Submit 

Negative 

Declarations

Anticipated States 

to Accept 

Delegation of 

Federal Plan

Florida X

Georgia X

Kentucky DNR

Jefferson 

County

(Louisville)

X

X

Mississippi X

North Carolina 

DNR

Forsyth County, 

NC

(WinstonSalem)

Mecklenburg 

County, NC

(Charlotte)

Buncombe 

County, NC 

(Asheville)

X

X

X

X

South Carolina X

Tennessee X

Region 

5

Illinois X

Indiana X

Michigan X

Minnesota X

Ohio X

Wisconsin X

Arkansas X
 

EPA 

Region

State/Local 

Agency

Status 

TBD

Draft State 

Plan 

Submitted

Final

State Plan 

Submitted

State Plan 

Approved

Negative 

Declaration 

Submitted or 

Approved 

Anticipated 

States to 

Submit 

Negative 

Declarations

Anticipated States 

to Accept 

Delegation of 

Federal Plan

Region 

6

Louisiana X

New MexicoCity of 

Albuquerque

X

X

Oklahoma X

Texas X

Region 

7

Iowa X

Kansas X

Missouri X

Nebraska X

Region 

8

Colorado X

Montana X

North Dakota X

South Dakota X

Utah X

Wyoming X

Region 

9

Arizona DEQ X

Maricopa 

County,AZ

X

Pima County, 

AZ

X

Pinal County, 

AZ

X

California X

Hawaii X

Nevada DEP X

American 

Samoa

X

Guam X

Region 

10

Alaska X

Idaho X

Oregon X

Washington X
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY

 385.36

 385.56

 386.11

 386.69

 387.44

 388.18

 388.66

 389.04

 389.30

 389.70

 390.10

 390.50

 390.88

 391.06

 391.39

 391.49

 391.70

 392.28

 392.42

 392.54

 392.49

 392.52

 393.10

 393.22

 393.60

 393.54

 393.64

 394.02

 394.16

 394.40

 394.52

 411,411

 412,867

 416,881

 421,130

 426,647

 432,116

 435,677

 438,504

 440,442

 443,430

 446,426

 449,428

 452,288

 453,645

 456,136

 456,892

 458,481

 462,880

 463,945

 464,858

 464,477

 464,705

 469,127

 470,043

 472,951

 472,491

 473,257

 476,172

 477,247

 479,093

 480,017

 0

 0

 3,123

 3,054

 2,989

 3,073

 4,526

 3,029

 3,041

 3,038

 3,006

 2,320

 2,267

 2,244

 2,260

 0

 0

 2,274

 0

 0

 0

 0

 3,805

 0

 3,750

 0

 0

 2,237

 1,438

 1,475

 1,453

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

SAN LUIS RESERVOIR FEDERAL February 10, 2009

DAILY OPERATIONS

DECEMBER 2008 RUN DATE:

FEDERAL

CHANGE CHANGE

PACHECO

PUMP

TOTALS 69,624 0 10,431 36,648

FEDERAL

PUMP ADJ

FEDERAL

GEN

 1,018

 1,456

 4,014

 4,249

 5,517

 5,469

 3,561

 2,827

 1,938

 2,988

 2,996

 3,002

 2,860

 1,357

 2,491

 756

 1,589

 4,399

 1,065

 913

-381

 228

 4,422

 916

 2,908

-460

 766

 2,915

 1,075

 1,846

 924

 372

 376

 380

 347

 331

 351

 338

 354

 338

 360

 359

 356

 327

 319

 301

 321

 306

 201

 218

 311

 327

 345

 365

 356

 336

 327

 328

 329

 357

 362

 433

-385

-1,109

2,130

2,652

2,398

2,430

3,905

2,524

2,469

2,288

2,426

1,772

1,703

1,779

2,032

-510

-464

1,665

-310

-430

-351

-424

3,060

-444

3,240

-387

-606

1,621

1,074

803

97

ELEV STORAGE

 54,402

 184,847

 183,738

 185,868

 188,520

 190,918

 193,348

 197,253

 199,777

 202,246

 204,534

 206,960

 208,732

 210,435

 212,214

 214,246

 213,736

 213,272

 214,937

 214,627

 214,197

 213,846

 213,422

 216,482

 216,038

 219,278

 218,891

 218,285

 219,906

 220,980

 221,783

 221,880

FEDERAL

STORAGE

COMMENTS : 

VALUES IN ACRE-FEET

 185,232

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0
Opinion issued June 27, 2024

In The 

## Court of Appeals For The 

## First District of Texas

———————————— NO. 01 - 2 4 - 00 200 - CV

——————————— BRANDON GEOFFREY SCOTTIE WEED AS REPRESENTATIVE OF THE ESTATE OF SCOTTIE WEED, CHRIS DUDLEY, INDIVIDUALLY AND AS REPRESENTATIVE OF THE ESTATE OF ANA WEED, AND

VIRGINIA MONTALVO , Appellant s

V. FARMERS TEXAS COUNTY MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY , Appellee
On Appeal from 295th District Court Harris County, Texas Trial Court Case No. 2022 - 36231

MEMORANDUM OPINION Appellant s, Brandon Geoffrey Scottie Weed as Representative of the Estate of Scottie Weed, Chris Dudley, I ndividually and as Representative of the Estate of2

Ana Weed, and Virginia Montalvo, filed th e i r notice of appeal on March 1 1 , 202 4. Appellants did not pay their appellate filing fee or establish indigence for purposes of appellate costs. See T EX
. R. A PP
. P. 5, 20.1

. The Clerk of this Court notified Appellant s that unless they paid the appellate filing fee by May 2, 2024, h er appeal could be dismissed. See T EX
. R. A PP
. P. 42.3(b). To date, Appellant s ha ve not paid the appellate filing fee nor established indigence for purposes of appellate costs

. Appellants also failed to pay , or ma k e arrangements to pay , the fee for preparing the clerk’s record

. See T EX
. R. C IV
. P. 145; T EX
. R. A PP
. P . 3 4.1

. We notified Appellants that their appeal could be dismissed for want of prosecution if the clerk’s record was not filed. See T EX
. R. A PP
. P. 37 .3 (a), (b). We directed Appellants to submit written evidence from the trial court clerk by May 13, 2024, reflecting she paid, or made arrangements to pay, the fee for preparing the clerk’s record. To date, Appellant s ha ve not responded to this Court’s n otice and the clerk’s record has not been filed. W e dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution

. See T EX
. R. A PP
. P. 37.3(b), 42.3(b)

– (c). We d ismiss any pending motions as moot. PER CURIAM Panel consists of Justices Hightower , Rivas

- Molloy, and Farris

.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY ELEV

 3,451.53

 3,451.40

 3,451.22

 3,451.09

 3,450.97

 3,450.79

 3,450.66

 3,450.48

 3,450.29

 3,450.17

 3,450.02

 3,449.86

 3,449.74

 3,449.56

 3,449.43

 3,449.24

 3,449.13

 3,448.99

 3,448.87

 3,448.75

 3,448.63

 3,448.45

 3,448.38

 3,448.26

 3,448.14

 3,448.01

 3,447.90

 3,447.83

 3,447.65

 3,447.58

 3,447.46

 29,485

 29,415

 29,318

 29,248

 29,184

 29,088

 29,019

 28,924

 28,823

 28,759

 28,680

 28,596

 28,533

 28,438

 28,370

 28,270

 28,212

 28,139

 28,076

 28,014

 27,952

 27,858

 27,822

 27,759

 27,697

 27,629

 27,573

 27,536

 27,444

 27,408

 27,346

STORAGE

-96

-70

-97

-70

-64

-96

-69

-95

-101

-64

-79

-84

-63

-95

-68

-100

-58

-73

-63

-62

-62

-94

-36

-63

-62

-68

-56

-37

-92

-36

-62

CHANGE

2.5

15.0

-0.7

15.2

16.0

-0.7

18.1

6.0

3.9

21.5

11.8

4.5

15.7

-0.2

17.6

-0.5

19.6

10.8

12.5

13.0

9.1

-5.7

23.1

3.4

4.0

-2.0

8.1

20.6

-8.9

20.1

2.2

INFLOW

 48

 46

 45

 47

 45

 44

 49

 50

 51

 50

 49

 44

 44

 44

 49

 47

 46

 45

 42

 42

 38

 39

 39

 33

 33

 30

 34

 37

 35

 36

 31

CONDUIT

 .0

 .0

 .0

 .0

 .0

 .0

 .0

 .0

 .0

 .0

 .0

 .0

 .0

 .0

 .0

 .0

 .0

 .0

 .0

 .0

 .0

 .0

 .0

 .0

 .0

 .0

 .0

 .0

 .0

 .0

 .0

SPILL

 1.0

 1.0

 1.0

 1.0

 1.0

 1.0

 1.0

 1.0

 1.0

 1.0

 1.0

 1.0

 1.0

 1.0

 1.0

 1.0

 1.0

 1.0

 1.0

 1.0

 1.0

 1.0

 1.0

 1.0

 1.0

 1.0

 1.0

 1.0

 1.0

 1.0

 1.0

PK CR

 1.9

 3.3

 2.2

 2.5

 2.3

 2.7

 2.9

 2.9

 2.8

 2.8

 1.6

 1.8

 2.5

 2.7

 1.9

 1.9

 1.8

 1.6

 1.3

 1.3

 1.4

 1.7

 1.2

 1.2

 1.3

 1.3

 1.3

 1.3

 1.5

 1.2

 1.5

C.F.S.

 .110

 .190

 .128

 .145

 .135

 .158

 .165

 .170

 .160

 .165

 .095

 .106

 .143

 .158

 .113

 .114

 .103

 .093

 .075

 .075

 .082

 .098

 .070

 .073

 .080

 .075

 .078

 .077

 .087

 .069

 .092

INCHES

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

PRECIP

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

OCTOBER 2002 JENKINSON LAKE DAILY OPERATIONS RUN DATE: 11/14/2002

IN LAKE

EVAPORATION

INCHES

C.F.S.

COMPUTED*

ACRE-FEET

RELEASE - C.F.S. 

TOTALS -2,235 275.6 1,312 31.0 0.0 59.6 3.482 .00

ACRE-FEET -2,235 546.7 2,602 61.5 0.0 118.2

COMMENTS:

* COMPUTED INFLOW IS THE SUM OF CHANGE IN STORAGE, RELEASES AND EVAPORATION.

DATA BASED ON 24 HOUR PERIOD ENDING 0800.

SUMMARY

RELEASE (ACRE-FEET)

CAMINO-CONDUIT 2,602.4

SLY PARK CREEK

SPILL

 61.5

 0.0

 0.0

PRECIPITATION

THIS MONTH =

JULY 1, 2002 TO DATE = 0.02

 29,581

 2,602.4 0.00

CAMINO SLY

CAMP

CREEK

C.F.S.

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

E.I.D. PROJECT

E.I.D. WATER RIGHTS