alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32.2


CERTIFICATION


PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Annual Report of Lepercq Corporate Income Fund L.P. (the “Partnership”) on Form 10-K for the period ended December 31, 2013 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, I, Patrick Carroll, Vice President and Treasurer (principal financial officer) of Lex GP-1 Trust, the general partner of the Partnership, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:


(1) The Annual Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and


(2) The information contained in the Annual Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the issuer.





/s/ Patrick CarrollPatrick CarrollVice President and Treasurer (principal financial officer) of Lex GP-1 Trust,the general partner of Lepercq Corporate Income Fund L.P.March 17, 2014
### §8. "Person", "human being", "child", and "individual" as including born-alive infant

(a) In determining the meaning of any Act of Congress, or of any ruling, regulation, or interpretation of the various administrative bureaus and agencies of the United States, the words "person", "human being", "child", and "individual", shall include every infant member of the species homo sapiens who is born alive at any stage of development.

(b) As used in this section, the term "born alive", with respect to a member of the species homo sapiens, means the complete expulsion or extraction from his or her mother of that member, at any stage of development, who after such expulsion or extraction breathes or has a beating heart, pulsation of the umbilical cord, or definite movement of voluntary muscles, regardless of whether the umbilical cord has been cut, and regardless of whether the expulsion or extraction occurs as a result of natural or induced labor, cesarean section, or induced abortion.

(c) Nothing in this section shall be construed to affirm, deny, expand, or contract any legal status or legal right applicable to any member of the species homo sapiens at any point prior to being "born alive" as defined in this section.

(Added Pub. L. 107–207, §2(a), Aug. 5, 2002, 116 Stat. 926.)
ex-101_06182015inccomp






Exhibit 10.1
FOURTH AMENDMENT TO THE
SECOND AMENDED AND RESTATED
HORNBECK OFFSHORE SERVICES, INC.
INCENTIVE COMPENSATION PLAN
This FOURTH AMENDMENT TO THE SECOND AMENDED AND RESTATED HORNBECK OFFSHORE SERVICES, INC. INCENTIVE COMPENSATION PLAN (this "Amendment") is made effective as of the 18th day of  June, 2015, by the Board of Directors (the "Board") of Hornbeck Offshore Services, Inc. (the "Company").
WHEREAS, the Company sponsors the Second Amended and Restated Hornbeck Offshore Services, Inc. Incentive Compensation Plan (the "Plan");
WHEREAS, pursuant to Section 13.1 of the Plan, the Board may at any time amend the provisions of the Plan; 
WHEREAS, the Company desires to amend the Plan to increase the number of shares of common stock that may be delivered pursuant to awards granted under the Plan; and 
WHEREAS, the stockholders of the Company have passed a resolution approving this Amendment; 
NOW, THEREFORE, the Board hereby amends the Plan as follows:
1.Section 4.1 shall be amended to increase the number of shares authorized under the Plan by 750,000 by replacing the first sentence with the following:
"The maximum number of shares of Common Stock that may be delivered pursuant to Awards granted under the Plan is 4,950,000 shares."


2.    Except as set forth herein and as previously amended, the Plan shall continue in full force and effect.
*     *     *     *     *
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1998
<CASH>                                              21
<SECURITIES>                                         3
<RECEIVABLES>                                       37
<ALLOWANCES>                                         1
<INVENTORY>                                         89
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                   153
<PP&E>                                             319
<DEPRECIATION>                                     161
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                     336
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                               41
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            23
<OTHER-SE>                                         166
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                       336
<SALES>                                            432
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                   432
<CGS>                                              428
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                      428
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                    35
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   4
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                   (32)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                               (32)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      7
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                      (25)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (1.10)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (1.10)
        

</TABLE>
(No. 00028

#### Frances R. O’Neill, as wife of Edward O’Neill, deceased, Claimant, *vs.*State of Illinois, Respondent.

*Opinion filed August 16, 1973.*

Frances R. O’Neill, Claimant, by William Gibbons, her attorney.

William J. Scott, Attorney General; Saul R. Wexler, Assistant Attorney General, and Vincent Biskupic, Special Assistant Attorney General, for Respondent.

Per Curiam.

This claim, arising out of the death of a policeman killed in the line of duty, seeks payment of compensation to the decedent’s beneficiary pursuant to the provisions *530of the "Law Enforcement Officers and Firemen Compensation Act”, [hereafter, "the Act”] *Ch. 48, Sec. 281, et. seq., Ill.Rev.Stat., 1971.*

The court has carefully considered the application for benefits submitted on the form prescribed and furnished by the Attorney General; a written statement of the decedent’s supervising officer; and a report by the Illinois Attorney General’s office which substantiates matters set forth in the application. Based upon these documents and other evidence submitted at a hearing before the full court on July 11, 1973, the court finds as follows:

1. That the claimant, Frances R. O’Neill, is the wife of the decedent and is the beneficiary who was designated by him as stated in her application for benefits.

2. That the decedent, Edward O’Neill, was a policeman employed by the Chicago Police Department and engaged in the active performance of his duties, within the meaning of Sec. 2(c) of the Act, on November 1, 1972.

3. That on said date Lieutenant O’Neill was on duty in the airport terminal at Midway Airport at approximately 9:15 p.m. and was the senior commanding officer in charge of the airport traffic security for the arrival of Senator George McGovern. Lt. O’Neill’s commander, Captain Edward J. Barry, Traffic Area 3, received a call that George McGovern was to arrive in advance of his scheduled time. He notified Lt. O’Neill to rush to the airport and take charge of and complete the required traffic control procedures. Lt. O’Neill left Traffic Area 3 headquarters at 3900 S. California "with sirens sounding”. Approximately fifteen minutes after his arrival at the terminal, Lt. O’Neill was stricken and *531collapsed. Lt. O’Neill died at the airport terminal on November 1, 1972, the death certificate reciting the cause of death as "acute myocardial infarction”.

4. That Lt. O’Neill died in the line of duty as defined in Sec. 2(c) of the Act.

5. That the proof submitted in support of this claim satisfied all of the requirements of the Act, and the claim is therefore compensable thereunder.

It Is Hereby Ordered that the sum of $10,000.00 (Ten Thousand Dollars) be awarded to Frances R. O’Neill as wife and designated beneficiary of the deceased police officer, Edward O’Neill.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY ELEV

 1,901.26

 1,901.05

 1,901.01

 1,901.35

 1,901.49

 1,901.16

 1,901.08

 1,900.28

 1,900.36

 1,900.14

 1,900.30

 1,900.58

 1,900.56

 1,900.58

 1,900.26

 1,900.40

 1,900.53

 1,900.71

 1,900.68

 1,900.46

 1,900.27

 1,900.40

 1,900.58

 1,900.46

 1,900.20

 1,900.37

 1,900.84

 1,900.66

 1,900.68

 1,900.74

 1,900.26

 14,105

 13,948

 13,918

 14,173

 14,278

 14,031

 13,971

 13,381

 13,440

 13,278

 13,396

 13,602

 13,587

 13,602

 13,366

 13,469

 13,565

 13,698

 13,675

 13,514

 13,374

 13,469

 13,602

 13,514

 13,322

 13,447

 13,793

 13,661

 13,675

 13,720

 13,366

STORAGE

+349

-157

-30

+255

+105

-247

-60

-590

+59

-162

+118

+206

-15

+15

-236

+103

+96

+133

-23

-161

-140

+95

+133

-88

-192

+125

+346

-132

+14

+45

-354

CHANGE

518

614

663

804

465

625

678

403

585

524

388

435

539

570

412

577

604

505

320

526

568

586

1,023

719

431

392

609

444

523

607

442

INFLOW

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 45

 80

 80

 80

 33

 0

 0

 0

 0

POWER

 184

 185

 186

 186

 187

 187

 185

 188

 187

 188

 188

 190

 191

 190

 182

 182

 180

 183

 185

 183

 182

 182

 183

 183

 185

 182

 185

 144

 150

 151

 151

SPILL

 130

 130

 130

 130

 130

 130

 130

 130

 130

 130

 130

 130

 130

 130

 130

 130

 130

 130

 130

 130

 130

 130

 85

 50

 50

 50

 105

 154

 154

 154

 154

OUTLETS

 15

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 2

 1

 0

 0

 0

 1

 1

 0

 0

 0

 1

 0

 1

 1

 0

 1

 0

 1

 0

 0

 1

 1

 1

 0

 1

C.F.S.

 .68

 .01

 .01

 .02

 .01

 .01

 .08

 .03

 .01

 .01

 .02

 .04

 .04

 .02

 .01

 .02

 .03

 .01

 .04

 .03

 .02

 .05

 .01

 .05

 .00

 .00

 .05

 .06

 .06

 .02

 .04

INCHES

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

JANUARY 2014 LEWISTON LAKE DAILY OPERATIONS RUN DATE: February 1, 2014

IN LAKE

EVAPORATION

C.F.S. FRANCIS CARR

COMPUTED*

ACRE-FEET

RELEASE - C.F.S. 

TOTALS -390 17,099 318 3,816 5,595 29 1.49

ACRE-FEET -390 33,916 631 7,569 11,098 58

* COMPUTED INFLOW IS THE SUM OF CHANGE IN STORAGE, RELEASES AND EVAPORATION.

(1) OUTLET RELEASE INCLUDES FISH RELEASE.

(2) INCHES OF EVAPORATION TAKEN FROM PAN AT TRINITY RIVER HATCHERY.

SUMMARY

RELEASE (ACRE-FEET)

TOTAL POWER 631

TOTAL RIVER 19,298 34,250

 13,756

 14,952

RIVER

JUDGE FRANCIS CARR POWERPLANT

TOTAL RELEASE

JUDGE (2)

(1) POWERPLANT

 13

 378

 362

 359

 95

 433

 391

 381

 238

 288

 11

 10

 225

 242

 219

 213

 245

 125

 16

 293

 327

 225

 643

 449

 213

 17

 111

 212

 211

 279

 314

 7,538

 14,952
§ 19.342 Receipt of spirits, wines, and alcoholic flavoring materials for processing. ( a ) *Receipt of bulk spirits.* A proprietor may receive bulk spirits into the processing account: ( 1 ) From the production or storage account at the same plant;
( 2 ) By transfer in bond from another distilled spirits plant; or
( 3 ) By withdrawal from customs custody under 26 U.S.C. 5232.
( b ) *Receipt of wines.* A proprietor may receive wines into the processing account: ( 1 ) From the storage account at the same plant; or
( 2 ) By transfer in bond from a bonded wine cellar or another distilled spirits plant.
( c ) *Receipt of spirits returned to bond.* A proprietor may receive spirits into the processing account that are returned to bond under the provisions of 26 U.S.C. 5215.
( d ) *Receipt of alcoholic flavoring materials.* A proprietor may receive alcoholic flavoring materials into the processing account.
( e ) *Dumping of spirits, wines, and alcoholic flavoring materials.* As provided in §§ 19.343 and 19.598, the proprietor must prepare a dump/batch record when spirits, wines, and alcoholic flavoring materials are dumped for use in the processing account. Spirits, wines, and alcoholic flavoring materials that are dumped into the processing account are subject to the following rules: ( 1 ) Spirits and wines received in bulk containers or conveyances may be retained in the containers or conveyances in which received until used, but must be recorded as dumped upon receipt;
( 2 ) Spirits and wines received by pipeline must be deposited in tanks and recorded as dumped on receipt; and
( 3 ) Alcoholic flavoring materials may be retained in the containers in which received or may be transferred to another container if the proprietor marks or otherwise indicates thereon, the full identification of the original container, the date of receipt, and the quantity deposited. Alcoholic flavoring materials and nonalcoholic ingredients will be considered dumped when mixed with spirits or wines.
( f ) *Gauging.* A proprietor must determine the proof gallon content of spirits, wines, and alcoholic flavoring materials at the time of dumping. Additional information regarding the gauging of spirits, wines, and alcoholic flavoring materials is found in subpart K of this part.
(26 U.S.C. 5201)
**Exhibit32.2**

**PrincipalFinancial Officer Certification**

In connection withthe annual report on Form 10-K of Staples, Inc. (the “Company”) for the periodended February 3, 2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission onor about the date hereof (the “Report”), the undersigned, John J. Mahoney,Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.Section 1350, that:

(1) the Reportfully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
|                          | /s/ John J. Mahoney                       |
|--------------------------|-------------------------------------------|
| Dated: February 28, 2007 | John J. Mahoney                           |
|                     | Vice Chairman and Chief Financial Officer |
|                     | (Principal Financial Officer)             |

 

----
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
 WASHINGTON, D. C. 20549
 
 FORM 8-K
 CURRENT REPORT
Pursuant to Section 13 or 15 (d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934
 Date of Report (Date of earliest event
reported): June 30, 2011
 Bakers Footwear Group, Inc.
  Missouri
    
    000-50563
    
    43-0577980(State or Other 
Jurisdiction of Incorporation)
    
    (Commission
File Number)
    
    (I.R.S. Employer
Identification Number)
 2815 Scott Avenue 
St. Louis, Missouri
    
    63103(Address of Principal Executive Offices)
    
    (Zip Code)
  
 see
 o
 o
 o
 o




---



##### 



Item 1.01. Entry into a Material Definitive Agreement.
 Amendment to Subordinated Convertible Debentures and Subordinated Convertible Debenture Purchase
Agreement.
     Other terms of Subordinated Convertible Debentures.




---



##### 



Item 2.03. Creation of a Direct Financial Obligation or an Obligation under an Off-Balance
Sheet Arrangement of a Registrant.
  Item 3.02. Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities.




---



##### 



Item 3.03. Material Modification of Rights of Security Holders.
  Item 9.01. Financial Statements and Exhibits.




---



##### 



SIGNATURES
  BAKERS FOOTWEAR GROUP, INC.Date: July 5, 2011
    By:
    /s/ Charles R. Daniel, IIICharles R. Daniel, IIIExecutive Vice President,
Chief Financial Officer,
Controller, Treasurer and
Secretary




---



##### 



EXHIBIT INDEX
 Exhibit No.
    
    Description of Exhibit4.1
    
    Second Amendment to Subordinated Convertible Debentures and
Subordinated Convertible Debenture Purchase Agreement dated June
30, 2011.4.2
    
    Amended and Restated Subordination Agreement dated June 30, 2011 by
and among the Company, the Investors named therein and Bank of
America, N.A.10.1
    
    Sixth Amendment to Second Amended and Restated Loan and Security
Agreement dated June 30, 2011 by and among the Company and Bank of
America, N.A.
(No. 74-CC-776

#### Mabel Wells, Claimant, *vs.*State of Illinois, Respondent.

*Opinion filed June 27, 1974.*

Sherwin & Sherwin, Attorney for Claimant.

William J. Scott, Attorney General; Martin A. Soll, Assistant Attorney General, for Respondent.

Perlin, C. J.

Claimant, Mabel Wells, seeks to recover from the State of Illinois the sum of $500.00, which was deposited by Arthur Wells, deceased, and husband of Claimant, *509with the Office of the Secretary of State as evidence of financial responsibility in accordance with the provisions of Chap. 951⁄2, Ill. Rev. Stat. Respondent admitted to all paragraphs of Claimant’s complaint, which in part is as follows:

1. That Arthur Wells deposited with the office of the Secretary of State of the State of Illinois in accordance with Chap. 951⁄2, Section 7-204, Ill. Rev. Stat. (1965), as amended, the sum of $500.00.

2. That on July 2, 1973, Arthur Wells was entitled to a refund of said sum (Ill. Rev. Stats. Chap. 951⁄2, Section 7-503), and was so notified by the Office of the Secretary of State of Illinois.

3. That Mabel Wells is the widow and sole heir of Arthur Wells, deceased, said Arthur Wells having died on July 29, 1970.

4. That as a result of the failure of Claimant to file claim for refund, the funds were transferred to the General Revenue Fund on September 28, 1973.

Section 7-503 of Chap. 951⁄2, Ill. Rev. Stat. provides that any person having a legal claim against such deposit may enforce it by appropriate proceedings in the Court of Claims subject to limitations prescribed for such court. It is the opinion of this court that Claimant has complied with this statute and is justly entitled to a refund.

An award is accordingly made by this court to Claimant, Mabel Wells, in the sum of $500.00.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY ELEV

 1,052.58

 1,052.79

 1,053.14

 1,053.77

 1,054.66

 1,055.44

 1,056.00

 1,056.24

 1,056.53

 1,056.84

 1,057.13

 1,057.59

 1,057.86

 1,057.76

 1,057.62

 1,057.53

 1,057.44

 1,057.21

 1,057.05

 1,057.00

 1,057.12

 1,057.30

 1,057.48

 1,057.82

 1,058.25

 1,058.43

 1,058.55

 1,058.66

 1,058.73

 1,058.89

 1,059.34

 2,003.4

 2,005.8

 2,009.7

 2,016.7

 2,026.6

 2,035.3

 2,041.5

 2,044.2

 2,047.5

 2,051.0

 2,054.2

 2,059.4

 2,062.4

 2,061.3

 2,059.7

 2,058.7

 2,057.7

 2,055.1

 2,053.3

 2,052.8

 2,054.1

 2,056.1

 2,058.2

 2,062.0

 2,066.8

 2,068.9

 2,070.2

 2,071.5

 2,072.3

 2,074.1

 2,079.2

STORAGE

+1.4

+2.3

+3.9

+7.0

+9.9

+8.7

+6.3

+2.7

+3.3

+3.5

+3.3

+5.2

+3.0

-1.1

-1.6

-1.0

-1.0

-2.6

-1.8

-0.6

+1.4

+2.0

+2.0

+3.8

+4.9

+2.0

+1.4

+1.2

+0.8

+1.8

+5.1

CHANGE

5,668

6,463

7,386

8,706

9,726

9,720

7,582

6,753

7,041

7,153

7,811

8,471

7,066

5,864

5,381

5,200

5,086

5,666

5,403

5,606

6,670

7,137

7,672

8,096

8,266

7,678

6,882

6,673

6,813

7,230

8,001

INFLOW

 4,843

 5,147

 5,329

 5,076

 4,632

 5,238

 4,424

 5,351

 5,335

 5,308

 6,088

 5,758

 5,442

 6,345

 6,103

 5,642

 5,557

 6,907

 6,206

 5,810

 5,836

 5,995

 6,516

 6,064

 5,685

 6,547

 6,155

 5,969

 6,313

 6,205

 5,337

POWER

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

SPILL

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

OUTLET

 100

 143

 101

 101

 97

 90

 0

 44

 65

 91

 80

 102

 91

 87

 73

 69

 40

 65

 105

 80

 153

 120

 135

 102

 135

 106

 44

 77

 102

 113

 95

C.F.S.

 .28

 .40

 .28

 .28

 .27

 .25

 .00

 .12

 .18

 .25

 .22

 .28

 .25

 .24

 .20

 .19

 .11

 .18

 .29

 .22

 .42

 .33

 .37

 .28

 .37

 .29

 .12

 .21

 .28

 .31

 .26

INCHES

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .19

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .09

 .02

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .05

PRECIP

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

MAY 2017 NEW MELONES LAKE DAILY OPERATIONS RUN DATE: June 5, 2017

IN LAKE

EVAPORATION

INCHES

C.F.S.

COMPUTED*

1000 ACRE-FEET

RELEASE - C.F.S.

TOTALS +77.2 218,870 177,163 0 0 2,806 7.73 .35

ACRE-FEET +77,200 434,129 351,403 0 0 5,566

COMMENTS:

* COMPUTED INFLOW IS THE SUM OF CHANGE IN STORAGE, RELEASES AND EVAPORATION.

SUMMARY

RELEASE (ACRE-FEET)

POWER 351,403

SPILL 0

OUTLET

TOTAL

 0

 351,403

PRECIPITATION

THIS MONTH =

TO DATE =

 .35

JULY 1, 2016 49.82

 2,002.0

Table 13 

OCT 1, 2016 TO DATE = 49.81
#### In the Matter of Joseph Blank, Respondent, against City of New York, Appellant.

On December 2, 1946, respondent was injured when a bus owned and operated by appellant, in which he was a passenger, collided with an automobile. Respondent did not serve a notice of claim within the time required by section 50-e of the General Municipal Law, which time expired January 31, 1947. On April 15, 1947, respondent moved at Special Term for an order granting leave to serve a proposed notice of claim within a reasonable time, alleging that he had been unable by reason of physical incapacity to serve the notice in time. The appeal is from an order granting the application. Order reversed on the law and the facts, without costs, and the motion denied, without costs. There was not a showing of physical incapacity within the meaning of the statute, nor was there a showing that the failure to serve the notice of claim within the statutory period resulted from the disability. *(Matter of Auricchio*V. *City of New York,*272 App. Div. 1067’.) Furthermore, the application was not made within a reasonable time after the expiration of the period of disability relied upon as excusing the failure to serve the notice within the prescribed statutory period, and respondent’s excuse for the delay is insufficient. *(Matter of Buskin*v. *City of New York,*271 App. Div. 934.) Lewis, P. J., Carswell, Johnston, Sneed and Wenzel, JJ., concur.
###### Editorial Note on Part 25

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 25 appear by T.D. ATF-437, 66 FR 5478, 5479, Jan. 19, 2001.

#### § 25.64 Maintenance of notice file.

The brewer shall maintain the approved Brewer's Notice, Form 5130.10, and all incorporated documents at the brewery premises, in complete and current condition, readily available for inspection by an appropriate TTB officer.

(Sec. 201, Pub. L. 85-859, 72 Stat. 1388, as amended (26 U.S.C. 5401))