alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
### §106b. Amendments to Constitution

Whenever official notice is received at the National Archives and Records Administration that any amendment proposed to the Constitution of the United States has been adopted, according to the provisions of the Constitution, the Archivist of the United States shall forthwith cause the amendment to be published, with his certificate, specifying the States by which the same may have been adopted, and that the same has become valid, to all intents and purposes, as a part of the Constitution of the United States.

(Added Oct. 31, 1951, ch. 655, §2(b), 65 Stat. 710; amended Pub. L. 98–497, title I, §107(d), Oct. 19, 1984, 98 Stat. 2291.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

1984—Pub. L. 98–497 substituted "National Archives and Records Administration" and "Archivist of the United States" for "General Services Administration" and "Administrator of General Services", respectively.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date of 1984 Amendment

Amendment by Pub. L. 98–497 effective Apr. 1, 1985, see section 301 of Pub. L. 98–497, set out as a note under section 2102 of Title 44, Public Printing and Documents.

#### Similar Provisions; Repeal; Saving Clause; Delegation of Functions; Transfer of Property and Personnel

Similar provisions were contained in R.S. §205; 1950 Reorg. Plan No. 20, §1, eff. May 24, 1950, 15 F.R. 3178, 64 Stat. 1272. R.S. §205 was repealed by section 56(h) of act Oct. 31, 1951. Subsec. (l) of section 56 provided that the repeal should not affect any rights or liabilities existing under the repealed statute on the effective date of the repeal (Oct. 31, 1951). For delegation of functions under the repealed statute, and transfer of records, property, personnel, and funds, see sections 3 and 4 of 1950 Reorg. Plan No. 20, set out in the Appendix to Title 5, Government Organization and Employees.
(No. 73-CC-463

#### Oliver B. Fifer, Claimant, *vs.*State of Illinois, Department of Mental Health, Respondent.

*Opinion filed August 6,*1973..

Oliver B. Fifer, Claimant, pro se.

William J. Scott, Attorney General; Edward L. S. Arkema, Jr., Assistant Attorney General, for Respondent.

Per Curiam.
EXHIBIT 31-2

                                  CERTIFICATION


I, Stan Abramowitz, Chief Financial Officer, certify that:

1.   I have reviewed this annual report on Form 20-F of Mirtronics Inc.;

2.   Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of
     a material  fact or omit to state a  material  fact  necessary  to make the
     statements made, in light of the circumstances  under which such statements
     were made,  not  misleading  with  respect  to the  period  covered by this
     report;

3.   Based on my  knowledge,  the  financial  statements,  and  other  financial
     information  included  in  this  report,  fairly  present  in all  material
     respects the financial  condition,  results of operations and cash flows of
     the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4.   The  company's  other   certifying   officer  and  I  are  responsible  for
     establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined
     in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the company and have:

     a)   Designed  such  disclosure  controls  and  procedures,  or caused such
          disclosure   controls  and   procedures  to  be  designed   under  our
          supervision,  to ensure  that  material  information  relating  to the
          company, including its consolidated subsidiaries,  is made known to us
          by others  within those  entities,  particularly  during the period in
          which this report is being prepared;

     b)   Evaluated the effectiveness of the company's  disclosure  controls and
          procedures  and  presented  in this report our  conclusions  about the
          effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end
          of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

     c)   Disclosed in this report any change in the company's  internal control
          over financial  reporting  that occurred  during the period covered by
          the annual  report  that has  materially  affected,  or is  reasonably
          likely to materially or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the
          company's internal control over financial reporting; and

5.   The company's other certifying  officer and I have disclosed,  based on our
     most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the
     company's  auditors  and the  audit  committee  of the  company's  board of
     directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

     (a)  All significant  deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
          operation  of internal  control  over  financial  reporting  which are
          reasonably likely to adversely affect the company's ability to record,
          process, summarize and report financial information; and

     (b)  Any fraud, whether or not material,  that involves management or other
          employees  who  have a  significant  role  in the  company's  internal
          control over financial reporting.

Date: December 11, 2003
By: /s /STAN ABRAMOWITZ
Stan Abramowitz
Chief Financial Officer
Mirtronics Inc.
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Bridget M. McCormack, Chief Justice

Brian K. Zahra

David F. Viviano

Richard H. Bernstein

Elizabeth T. Clement

Megan K. Cavanagh

Elizabeth M. Welch,

Justices

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

 July 9, 2021

b0706

Order 

Clerk

July 9, 2021

162150

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

v SC: 162150

COA: 354113

Kalamazoo CC: 1990-000932-FC

JOSHUA DWAYNE LAWSON,

Defendant-Appellant.

_________________________________________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the August 25, 2020 order 

of the Court of Appeals is considered and, it appearing to this Court that the case of People 

v Poole (Docket No. 161529) is pending on appeal before this Court and that the decision 

in that case may resolve an issue raised in the present application for leave to appeal, we 

ORDER that the application be held in ABEYANCE pending the decision in that case.
RRRRRRR RR

R

R

R

R

R

R

R

R

R

RR

R

R R

R

R

R

R R RR

R

R

R

R

R

R

R

R

R

R

R

R R

R

R

R

R

R

R R

R

R

R

R

R

R

R R

R

R

R

R

R

R

R R

R

R

R

R

R

R

R

R

R

R

R

R

R

R R

R

R

R

RR

R

R

R

R

R

R

R

R

R

R

R

R

R R

R

RR

R

R

R

R

R

R

R

R

R

R

R

R

R

R

R

R

R

R

▲▲

▲

▲

▲

▲▲

▲▲▲

▲▲▲

▲

▲

▲

▲

▲ ▲

▲

▲

▲ ▲

▲

▲

▲

▲

▲

▲

▲▲ ▲ ▲▲ ▲

▲

▲ ▲

▲

▲

▲

▲

▲

▲

▲

▲

▲

▲

▲

▲▲

▲

▲

▲ ▲

▲▲

▲

▲ ▲

▲▲

▲▲

▲▲

▲

▲

▲▲

▲▲

▲

▲

▲

▲

▲

▲▲▲

▲

▲▲

Buenos Aires

National Wildlife Refuge

Aguirre

Lake

Sasabe, AZ

286

286

Brown Canyon

(Open by Guided Tour Only)

Arivaca Road

Arivaca

Cienega

Trail

g

Arivaca

Mustang Townsite Trail

g

Mormon

Lake

Sasabe, MX

Sonora, Mexico

q

To

Tucson

Montana Unit

(Closed to all

public entry)

Pronghorn

Pronghorn

Drive

Drive

Entrance Rd.

Arivaca

Creek Trail

g

To

19

Las Guijas Mountains

San 

Luis 

Mountains

Arivaca

Road

Ruby Road (pavement ends 7 miles)

Jaguar Trl.

Arch Trl.

1 0.5 0 1 2 3 4 Miles

SCALE 1 : 125000

N

Refuge Boundary

▲

q

g Trails

Refuge Roads

Pronghorn Drive

Major Roads

Campsites

Refuge HQ

Private Property

Hunt Zone

No Hunt Zone

Legend

R Tanks

Refuge Location Map

A R I Z O N A

BANWR
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

DAY ELEV

 1,197.26

 1,197.42

 1,197.53

 1,197.63

 1,197.74

 1,197.90

 1,198.04

 1,198.16

 1,198.23

 1,198.30

 1,198.37

 1,198.69

 1,198.76

 1,199.19

 1,199.03

 1,198.74

 1,198.62

 1,198.54

 1,198.47

 1,198.44

 1,198.71

 1,198.60

 1,198.88

 1,198.69

 1,198.60

 1,198.58

 1,198.95

 1,198.80

 1,198.70

 46.61

 46.89

 47.08

 47.25

 47.45

 47.72

 47.97

 48.18

 48.30

 48.43

 48.55

 49.12

 49.24

 50.01

 49.72

 49.21

 48.99

 48.85

 48.73

 48.67

 49.15

 48.96

 49.45

 49.12

 48.96

 48.92

 49.58

 49.31

 49.13

STORAGE

+0.52

+0.28

+0.19

+0.17

+0.19

+0.28

+0.24

+0.21

+0.12

+0.12

+0.12

+0.57

+0.12

+0.77

-0.29

-0.51

-0.21

-0.14

-0.12

-0.05

+0.48

-0.20

+0.50

-0.34

-0.16

-0.04

+0.66

-0.27

-0.18

CHANGE

266

145

107

99

101

145

128

117

92

122

168

706

568

1,530

736

222

241

182

130

139

686

221

905

251

245

277

1,094

421

350

INFLOW

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 20

 54

 100

 416

 500

 1,138

 877

 476

 336

 248

 182

 155

 440

 314

 650

 416

 314

 290

 759

 550

 428

SPILL

 5

 5

 5

 5

 5

 5

 5

 5

 5

 5

 5

 5

 5

 5

 5

 5

 5

 5

 5

 5

 5

 5

 5

 5

 5

 5

 5

 5

 5

OUTLET

 0

 0

 6

 7

 0

 0

 0

 5

 4

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 7

 0

 6

 6

 0

 0

 0

 0

 6

 0

 0

 0

 6

C.F.S.

 .00

 .00

 .10

 .12

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .08

 .07

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .12

 .00

 .11

 .10

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .11

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .11

INCHES

 .50

 .00

 .00

 .12

 .24

 .11

 .00

 .00

 .07

 .37

 .22

 .74

 .75

 .54

 .20

 .00

 .22

 .05

 .00

 .05

 .98

 .07

 .68

 .00

 .15

 .25

 .38

 .00

 .16

PRECIP

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-ORLAND PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

FEBRUARY 2000 EAST PARK RESERVOIR DAILY OPERATIONS RUN DATE: 03/14/2000

IN LAKE

EVAPORATION

INCHES

C.F.S.

COMPUTED*

1000 ACRE-FEET

RELEASE - C.F.S.

TOTALS +3.03 10,394 145 8,663 53 .92 6.85

ACRE-FEET +3,030 20,616 288 17,183 105

COMMENTS:

* COMPUTED INFLOW IS THE SUM OF CHANGE IN STORAGE, RELEASES AND EVAPORATION.

DATA BASED ON 24 HOUR PERIOD ENDING 0800 AM.

SUMMARY RELEASE (ACRE-FEET)

SPILL 17,183

OUTLET

TOTAL

 288

 17,471

PRECIPITATION

THIS MONTH =

TO DATE =

 6.85

JULY 1, 1999 15.52

 46.10
_________________________________________ 

 

 

Order Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan 

May 30, 2007 Clifford W. Taylor,

 Chief Justice 

133423 Michael F. Cavanagh 

Elizabeth A. Weaver 

Marilyn Kelly 

Maura D. Corrigan 

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff-Appellee, 

Robert P. Young, Jr. 

Stephen J. Markman,

 Justices 

v SC: 133423 

 COA: 275007 

Barry CC: 06-100088-FH 

LONNIE LEE MANN, 

Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/ 

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the January 23, 2007 

order of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not 

persuaded that the question presented should be reviewed by this Court. 

p0521 

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

May 30, 2007 

 Clerk
EX-4.23



 Exhibit 4.23 

AMENDMENT No 15 TO THE SERVICE AGREEMENT 

This Amendment No 15 to the Service Agreement dated March 05, 2008, is entered into on this 14th day
of October 2014 between MakeMyTrip (India) Private Limited having head office at 243, S P Infocity, Udyog Vihar, Phase I, Gurgaon, 122016 (“Client”) and Concentrix Daksh Services India Private Limited., (Formerly known
as IBM Daksh Business Process Services Pvt. Ltd) having its registered office at 1st Floor, Birla Tower, 25, Barakhamba Road, Connaught Place, New Delhi - 110001 (“Concentrix Daksh”) to amend the Service Agreement dated March 05 2008.
Therefore for good and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which the parties hereby acknowledge, the Agreement is amended as follows: 

RECITALS 
 WHEREAS, Client and Concentrix
Daksh have entered into the Services Agreement (the “Agreement”), pursuant to which Concentrix is providing outsourced services to Client. 
 AND
WHEREAS Concentrix Daksh Services India Private Limited was previously known as “IBM Daksh Business Process Services Pvt. Ltd” and was renamed as Concentrix Daksh Services India Private Limited., with effect from July 28, 2014, as
approved and acknowledged by the Registrar of Companies, New Delhi, Ministry of Corporate Affairs, Government of India by and under a fresh certificate of Incorporation issued subsequent to the name change dated 28th July 2014. 
 AND WHEREAS now the Parties wish to execute this Amendment to record such change in
name and style of Concentrix Daksh. 
  

	I.	General 

  

	 	A.	“Effective Date” shall mean July 28, 2014. 

  

	 	B.	Except as modified herein, the Agreement shall be unaffected and shall remain in full force and effect. 

  

	 	C.	In the event of a conflict between a provision of this Amendment and a provision of the Agreement, the terms herein will prevail. 

  

	II.	Amendment to Agreement: 

 The name of the Company “IBM Daksh Business Process Services Private
Limited” shall be replaced with “Concentrix Daksh Services India Private Limited.”, wherever applicable. 







 The signatories below represent and warrant that they are authorized representatives of the Parties on whose
behalf they are affixing their respective signatures to this Amendment to bind the Parties to this Amendment. 
  

									
	 For Make My Trip (India) Private Limited
		For Concentrix Daksh Services India Private Limited		
			
	 



 
		



 		
			
	 Authorized Representative
		Authorized Representative		 





	Name:		 




		Name:		 




	
	Title:		  
		Title:		 CFO
	
					
	Date:		 14/10/14
		Date:		 14/10/14
#### § 19.365 Spirits not originally intended for export.

Spirits produced in the United States and originally intended for domestic use may be exported with benefit of drawback or without payment of tax if the containers are marked as required by part 28 of this chapter. A proprietor may relabel the spirits to show any of the information required by § 19.519. If a proprietor intends to file a claim for drawback on spirits prepared for export under this section, the proprietor must follow the provisions of § 28.195b of this chapter. If a proprietor intends to withdraw spirits without payment of tax for export, the proprietor must follow the procedures in subpart E of part 28 of this chapter.

(26 U.S.C. 5062, 5214)
### Part D—National Center for Education Evaluation and Regional Assistance
(No. 73-CC-345

#### George Zwicky, Claimant, vs. State of Illinois, Secretary of State, Respondent.

*Opinion filed June 20, 1973.*

George Zwicky, Claimant, pro se.

William J. Scott, Attorney General; Saul R. Wexler, Assistant Attorney General, for Respondent.

Per Curiam.
§ 24.91 Conveyance of untaxpaid wine or spirits. Untaxpaid wine or spirits may be conveyed between different portions of the same bonded wine premises. Untaxpaid wine or spirits may also be conveyed by uninterrupted transportation over any public thoroughfare, or over a private roadway if the owner or lessee of the roadway agrees, in writing, to allow appropriate TTB officers access to the roadway to perform their official duty. The conveyance of wine or spirits as authorized in this section is subject to the following conditions: ( a ) The untaxpaid wine or spirits are not stored or allowed to remain on any premises other than bonded wine premises;
( b ) The untaxpaid wine or spirits are kept completely separate from taxpaid wine or spirits; and
( c ) A description of the means and route of conveyance and of the portions of the bonded wine premises between which wine or spirits will be conveyed, as well as a copy of any agreement furnished by the owner or lessee of a private roadway, have been submitted to and approved by the appropriate TTB officer.
(Sec. 201, Pub. L. 85-859, 72 Stat. 1379, as amended, 1381, as amended (26 U.S.C 5357, 5365))
(Approved by the Office of Management and Budget under control number 1512-0298) [T.D. ATF-299, 55 FR 24989, June 19, 1990, as amended by T.D. ATF-409, 64 FR 13683, 13684, Mar. 22, 1999]
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY ELEV

 540.82

 540.09

 539.80

 538.65

 537.86

 536.70

 535.32

 533.65

 532.36

 531.57

 529.70

 528.51

 527.19

 526.23

 525.09

 524.17

 523.41

 522.70

 522.02

 521.51

 520.45

 519.22

 518.10

 517.32

 516.68

 515.94

 515.00

 514.06

 512.87

 511.96

 511.15

 356.2

 353.3

 352.2

 347.7

 344.6

 340.1

 334.8

 328.5

 323.7

 320.7

 313.8

 309.5

 304.7

 301.2

 297.1

 293.9

 291.2

 288.7

 286.3

 284.6

 280.9

 276.7

 272.9

 270.3

 268.1

 265.6

 262.5

 259.4

 255.5

 252.6

 250.0

STORAGE

-3.2

-2.9

-1.1

-4.5

-3.1

-4.5

-5.3

-6.3

-4.8

-2.9

-6.9

-4.4

-4.8

-3.5

-4.1

-3.3

-2.7

-2.5

-2.4

-1.8

-3.7

-4.2

-3.8

-2.6

-2.2

-2.5

-3.1

-3.1

-3.9

-3.0

-2.6

CHANGE

1,808

1,617

2,236

695

1,937

1,881

1,787

1,274

1,938

2,516

506

1,834

1,610

2,382

1,853

1,696

1,672

1,818

1,907

2,371

1,687

1,453

1,428

1,747

2,037

2,091

1,909

1,882

1,357

1,557

1,475

INFLOW

 930

 797

 698

 644

 684

 809

 786

 757

 812

 826

 826

 756

 684

 712

 766

 819

 822

 800

 681

 742

 876

 902

 905

 906

 919

 844

 898

 961

 942

 926

 870

MADERA

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

SPILL

 2,210

 2,012

 1,836

 2,049

 2,534

 3,063

 3,387

 3,444

 3,298

 2,925

 2,888

 3,010

 3,080

 3,129

 2,854

 2,234

 1,884

 1,969

 2,120

 2,218

 2,370

 2,392

 2,147

 1,882

 1,918

 2,207

 2,292

 2,192

 2,092

 1,841

 1,629

FRIANT-KERN

 42

 36

 58

 53

 50

 50

 60

 46

 48

 28

 52

 49

 47

 53

 48

 48

 78

 67

 66

 65

 51

 50

 60

 49

 47

 46

 50

 49

 43

 38

 51

C.F.S.

 .33

 .28

 .46

 .42

 .40

 .40

 .49

 .38

 .40

 .23

 .44

 .42

 .40

 .46

 .42

 .42

 .69

 .59

 .59

 .58

 .46

 .45

 .55

 .45

 .43

 .43

 .47

 .46

 .41

 .36

 .49

INCHES

 .00

 .08

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

PRECIP

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

JULY 2004 MILLERTON LAKE DAILY OPERATIONS RUN DATE: August 23, 2004

IN LAKE

EVAPORATION

INCHES

C.F.S.

COMPUTED*

1000 ACRE-FEET

RELEASE - C.F.S. 

TOTALS -109.4 53,961 25,300 75,106 0 1,578 13.76 .08

ACRE-FEET -109,377 107,032 50,183 148,973 0 3,130

COMMENTS:

* COMPUTED INFLOW IS THE SUM OF CHANGE IN STORAGE, RELEASES, PUMPING AND EVAPORATION.

SUMMARY

RELEASE (ACRE-FEET)

CANALS

FRIANT-KERN

MADERA

 148,973

 50,183 213,277

PRECIPITATION

THIS MONTH =

JULY 1, 2004 TO DATE = 0.08

 359.3

 14,121 0.08

CANALS

AT FRIANT

TOTAL RELEASES

OUTLET

 219

 218

 218

 218

 218

 217

 217

 216

 218

 219

 218

 218

 217

 231

 240

 240

 238

 238

 237

 237

 236

 236

 237

 237

 237

 241

 242

 241

 241

 240

 239

RIVER

 7,119

 14,121

RIVER

Table 15
# Fourth Court of Appeals San Antonio, Texas

October 12, 2020

No. 04

- 20

- 00429

- CV

IN THE INTEREST OF Y.Z., N.A.Z., J.F.Z., AND V.V.Z., CHILDREN

From the County Court at Law

, Val Verde County, Texas

Trial Court No. 3814CCL Honorable Sergio J. Gonzalez , Judge Presiding



### O R D E R

This is an accelerated appeal of the trial court’s order terminating appellant’s parental rights. Appellant’s brief was originally due to be filed on October 12, 2020. 1 On October 9, 2020, appellant filed a motion requesting an extension of time until October 23, 2020 to file the brief.

The disposition of this appeal is governed by the standards set forth in Rule 6.2 of the Texas Rules of Judicial Administration. T EX

. R. J UD

. A DMIN

. 6.2. Accordingly, this appeal is required to be brought to final disposition within 180 days of the date the notice of appeal is filed. Id

. The motion is GRANTED, and appellant’s brief must be filed no later than October 23, 2020 . Given the time constraints governing the disposition of this appeal, further requests for extensions of time will be disfavored.

_________________________________ Beth Watkins , Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said court on this 12th day of October, 2020

.

1 Appellant’s motion states her brief is due on Tuesday, October 13, 2020, due to “a Monday holiday (Columbus Da y).” However, neither the State of Texas nor Bexar County recognizes Columbus Day as a “legal holiday,” and this court is open for business that day. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 44.1(a) (extending appellate deadlines that fall on “a legal holiday”).___________________________________ M ichael A. C ruz , Clerk of Court
#### Day Star Baptist Church, Inc., Appellant, v. Bernard Southers et al., Respondents.

Order unanimously affirmed, with $20 costs and disbursements. Mo opinion. Present — Peck, P. J., Glennon, Dore, Van Voorhis and Shientag, JJ.
### §1098aa. Short title; findings; reference

#### (a) Short title

This part may be cited as the "Higher Education Relief Opportunities for Students Act of 2003".

#### (b) Findings

The Congress finds the following:

(1) There is no more important cause than that of our nation's defense.

(2) The United States will protect the freedom and secure the safety of its citizens.

(3) The United States military is the finest in the world and its personnel are determined to lead the world in pursuit of peace.

(4) Hundreds of thousands of Army, Air Force, Marine Corps, Navy, and Coast Guard reservists and members of the National Guard have been called to active duty or active service.

(5) The men and women of the United States military put their lives on hold, leave their families, jobs, and postsecondary education in order to serve their country and do so with distinction.

(6) There is no more important cause for this Congress than to support the members of the United States military and provide assistance with their transition into and out of active duty and active service.

#### (c) Reference

References in this part to "the Act" are references to the Higher Education Act of 1965 (20 U.S.C. 1001 et seq.).

(Pub. L. 108–76, §1, Aug. 18, 2003, 117 Stat. 904.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

The Higher Education Act of 1965, referred to in subsec. (c), is Pub. L. 89–329, Nov. 8, 1965, 79 Stat. 1219, which is classified generally to this chapter. For complete classification of this Act to the Code, see Short Title note set out under section 1001 of this title and Tables.

#### Codification

Section was formerly set out in a note under section 1070 of this title.

Section was enacted as part of the Higher Education Relief Opportunities for Students Act of 2003, and not as part of title IV of the Higher Education Act of 1965 which comprises this subchapter.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Sense of Congress

Pub. L. 110–93, §1, Sept. 30, 2007, 121 Stat. 999, provided that: "It is the sense of Congress that—

"(1) the Higher Education Relief Opportunities for Students Act of 2003 [this part] addresses the unique situations that active duty military personnel and other affected individuals may face in connection with their enrollment in postsecondary institutions and their Federal student loans; and

"(2) the provisions authorized by such Act should be made permanent, thereby allowing the Secretary of Education to continue providing assistance to active duty service members and other affected individuals and their families."
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

MIDDLE DISTRICT

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

Respondent

v.

REUBEN MCDOWELL,

Petitioner :

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

: No. 135 MAL 2018

Petition for Allowance of Appeal from

the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW , this 31st day of July, 2018

, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is

DENIED

.
### **CHAPTER 51—ELEMENTARY AND SECONDARY EDUCATION BLOCK GRANT**